AAL 10-Q Quarterly Report June 30, 2013

AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC.

10-Ks and 10-Qs

10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009

PROXIES

DEF 14A	Filed on June 11, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on April 28, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on June 5, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on April 25, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on March 30, 2023
DEF 14A	Filed on June 8, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on April 28, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on April 29, 2021
DEF 14A	Filed on April 28, 2020
DEF 14A	Filed on April 29, 2019
DEF 14A	Filed on April 30, 2018
DEF 14A	Filed on May 1, 2017
DEF 14A	Filed on April 29, 2016
DEF 14A	Filed on April 22, 2015
DEF 14A	Filed on April 25, 2014
DEF 14A	Filed on April 21, 2011
DEF 14A	Filed on April 23, 2010
DEF 14A	Filed on None

10-Q 1 amr-10qx2013630.htm 10-Q AMR- 10Q- 2013.6.30

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



ý	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2013 .



¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition Period From to .

Commission file number 1-8400 .

AMR Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		75-1825172
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4333 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas		76155
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (817) 963-1234

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year , if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

¨ Large Accelerated Filer ý Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-accelerated Filer

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ý Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨ Yes ý No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $1 par value – 335,525,399 shares as of July 10, 2013 .

Table of Contents

INDEX

AMR CORPORATION

DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION




Forward-Looking Information		1

PART I:	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	2

Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	28
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	39
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	39

PART II:	OTHER INFORMATION	40

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	40
Item 6.	Exhibits	41

SIGNATURE		43

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Information

Statements in this report contain various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which represent the Company's expectations or beliefs concerning future events. When used in this document and in documents incorporated herein by reference, the words “expects,” “estimates,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “indicates,” “believes,” “projects,” “forecast,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” "would," "continue," “seeks,” "intends," “targets” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Similarly, statements that describe the Company's objectives, plans or goals, or actions the Company may take in the future, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the Company's expectations concerning its anticipated Merger with US Airways Group, Inc., and the challenges and costs of such Merger (including integrating operations and achieving anticipated synergies), the Chapter 11 Cases and the Company's business plan; the Company's operations and financial conditions, including changes in capacity, revenues, and costs; future financing plans and needs; the amounts of its unencumbered assets and other sources of liquidity; fleet plans; overall economic and industry conditions; plans and objectives for future operations; regulatory approvals and actions; and the impact on the Company of its results of operations in recent years and the sufficiency of its financial resources to absorb that impact. Guidance given in this report regarding capacity, fuel consumption, fuel prices, fuel hedging and unit costs constitutes forward-looking statements. Other forward-looking statements include statements which do not relate solely to historical facts, such as, without limitation, statements which discuss the possible future effects of current known trends or uncertainties, or which indicate that the future effects of known trends or uncertainties cannot be predicted, guaranteed or assured. All forward-looking statements in this report are based upon information available to the Company on the date of this report. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of factors that could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations. The following factors, in addition to other possible factors not listed, could cause the Company's actual results and financial position, and the timing of certain events, to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements: risks related to the Merger, including fulfillment of conditions, receipt of consents and approvals, and the inability to realize the contemplated benefits of the Merger; risks arising from the Chapter 11 Cases, including reorganization risks, liquidity risks, and common stock risks; the materially weakened financial condition of the Company, resulting from its significant losses in recent years; the potential impact on the demand for air travel resulting from downturns in economic conditions; the Company's ability to secure financing for all of its scheduled aircraft deliveries; the potential requirement for the Company to maintain reserves under its credit card processing agreements, which could materially adversely impact the Company's liquidity; the ability of the Company to generate additional revenues and reduce its costs; continued high and volatile fuel prices and further increases in the price of fuel, and the availability of fuel; reliance on third-party distribution channels for distribution of a significant portion of the Company's airline tickets; the Company's substantial indebtedness and other obligations; the ability of the Company to satisfy certain covenants and conditions in certain of its financing and other agreements; changes in economic and other conditions beyond the Company's control, and the volatile results of the Company's operations; the fiercely and increasingly competitive business environment faced by the Company; industry consolidation and alliance changes; low fare levels by historical standards and the Company's reduced pricing power; changes in the Company's corporate or business strategy; delays in scheduled aircraft deliveries or failure of new aircraft to perform as expected; dependence on a limited number of suppliers for aircraft, aircraft engines and parts; extensive government regulation of the Company's business; increasingly stringent environmental regulations; conflicts overseas or terrorist attacks; uncertainties with respect to the Company's international operations; outbreaks of a disease (such as SARS, avian flu or the H1N1 virus) that affects travel behavior; uncertainties with respect to the Company's relationships with unionized and other employee work groups; higher than normal numbers of pilot retirements and a potential shortage of pilots; increased insurance costs and potential reductions of available insurance coverage; the Company's ability to retain key management personnel; potential failures or disruptions of the Company's computer, communications or other technology systems; losses and adverse publicity resulting from any accident involving the Company's aircraft; interruptions or disruptions in service at one or more of the Company's primary market airports; the heavy taxation of the airline industry; inability to realize the full value of intangible assets or long-lived assets, resulting in material impairment charges; and interruptions or disruptions in relationships with third-party regional airlines or other third-party service providers. The Risk Factors contained in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including AMR's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 20, 2013, as amended (2012 Form 10-K), could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from historical results and from those expressed in forward-looking statements.

Table of Contents

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 . Financial Statements

AMR CORPORATION

DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited) (In millions, except per share amounts)




	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues
Passenger — American Airlines	$	4,888		$	4,837		$	9,502		$	9,394
— Regional Affiliates	752			790			1,431			1,460
Cargo	167			175			322			343
Other revenues	642			650			1,292			1,293
Total operating revenues	6,449			6,452			12,547			12,490
Expenses
Aircraft fuel	2,139			2,209			4,339			4,375
Wages, salaries and benefits	1,450			1,778			2,934			3,560
Other rentals and landing fees	343			333			690			661
Maintenance, materials and repairs	375			357			758			700
Depreciation and amortization	248			261			494			521
Commissions, booking fees and credit card expense	257			263			533			529
Aircraft rentals	179			130			343			272
Food service	149			130			288			255
Special charges and merger related	13			106			41			117
Other operating expenses	807			743			1,587			1,447
Total operating expenses	5,960			6,310			12,007			12,437
Operating Income (Loss)	489			142			540			53
Other Income (Expense)
Interest income	5			7			9			13
Interest expense (contractual interest expense equals $(176) and $(444) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and $(185) and $(383) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively)	(169		)	(164		)	(431		)	(342		)
Interest capitalized	13			12			25			24
Miscellaneous — net	6			(8		)	(3		)	(18		)
	(145		)	(153		)	(400		)	(323		)
Income (Loss) Before Reorganization Items, Net	344			(11		)	140			(270		)
Reorganization Items, Net	(124		)	(230		)	(284		)	(1,630		)
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes	220			(241		)	(144		)	(1,900		)
Income tax (benefit)	—			—			(22		)	—
Net Earnings (Loss)	$	220		$	(241	)	$	(122	)	$	(1,900	)
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic	$	0.65		$	(0.72	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(5.67	)
Diluted	0.59			(0.72		)	(0.36		)	(5.67		)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

AMR CORPORATION

DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited) (In millions)




	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net Earnings (Loss)	$	220		$	(241	)	$	(122	)	$	(1,900	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax:
Defined benefit pension plans and retiree medical:
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss and prior service cost	(33		)	57			(66		)	113
Current year change	—			—			—			—
Benefit plan modifications	—			—			—			—
Derivative financial instruments:
Change in fair value	(41		)	(104		)	(56		)	(56		)
Reclassification into earnings	13			1			12			(25		)
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Net change in value	1			—			—			2
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Before Tax	(60		)	(46		)	(110		)	34
Income tax expense on other comprehensive income	—			—			—			—
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	160		$	(287	)	$	(232	)	$	(1,866	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

AMR CORPORATION

DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited) (In millions)




	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Assets
Current Assets
Cash	$	604	$	480
Short-term investments	5,606		3,412
Restricted cash and short-term investments	863		850
Receivables, net	1,376		1,124
Inventories, net	589		580
Fuel derivative contracts	21		65
Other current assets	576		561
Total current assets	9,635		7,072
Equipment and Property
Flight equipment, net	10,510		10,310
Other equipment and property, net	2,083		2,099
Purchase deposits for flight equipment	696		710
	13,289		13,119
Equipment and Property Under Capital Leases
Flight equipment, net	202		222
Other equipment and property, net	59		61
	261		283
International slots and route authorities	710		708
Domestic slots and airport operating and gate lease rights, less accumulated amortization, net	149		161
Other assets	2,172		2,167
	$	26,216	$	23,510

Table of Contents

AMR CORPORATION

DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited) (In millions)




	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	1,507		$	1,244
Accrued liabilities	2,170			2,117
Air traffic liability	5,665			4,524
Current maturities of long-term debt	1,298			1,388
Current obligations under capital leases	29			31
Total current liabilities	10,669			9,304
Long-term debt, less current maturities	7,987			6,735
Obligations under capital leases, less current obligations	367			381
Pension and postretirement benefits	6,702			6,780
Other liabilities, deferred gains and deferred credits	1,860			1,691
Liabilities Subject to Compromise	6,847			6,606
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Preferred stock	—			—
Common stock	341			341
Additional paid-in capital	4,484			4,481
Treasury stock	(367		)	(367		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(3,090		)	(2,980		)
Accumulated deficit	(9,584		)	(9,462		)
	(8,216		)	(7,987		)
	$	26,216		$	23,510

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

AMR CORPORATION

DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited) (In millions)




	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Net Cash Provided by (used in) Operating Activities	$	1,840		$	1,722
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures, including aircraft lease deposits	(1,804		)	(733		)
Net decrease (increase) in short-term investments	(2,194		)	(890		)
Net decrease (increase) in restricted cash and short-term investments	(13		)	(34		)
Proceeds from sale of equipment, property, and investments/subsidiaries	26			57
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(3,985		)	(1,600		)
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations	(551		)	(602		)
Proceeds from:
Issuance of debt	1,684			—
Sale-leaseback transactions	1,132			568
Other	4			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	2,269			(34		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash	124			88
Cash at beginning of period	480			283
Cash at end of period	$	604		$	371

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

AMR CORPORATION

DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Chapter 11 Reorganization

Overview

On November 29, 2011 (the Petition Date), AMR Corporation (AMR or the Company), its principal subsidiary, American Airlines, Inc. (American) and certain of the Company’s other direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for relief (the Chapter 11 Cases) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code), in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court). The Chapter 11 Cases are being jointly administered under the caption “In re AMR Corporation, et al., Case No. 11-15463-SHL.”

The Company and the other Debtors are operating as “debtors in possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In general, as debtors in possession under the Bankruptcy Code, we are authorized to continue to operate as an ongoing business but may not engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Code enables the Company to continue to operate its business without interruption, and the Bankruptcy Court has granted additional relief covering, among other things, obligations to (i) employees, (ii) taxing authorities, (iii) insurance providers, (iv) independent contractors for improvement projects, (v) foreign vendors, (vi) other airlines pursuant to certain interline agreements, and (vii) certain vendors deemed critical to the Debtors’ operations.

While operating as debtors in possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may sell or otherwise dispose of or liquidate assets or settle liabilities, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court or otherwise as permitted in the ordinary course of business. On April 15, 2013, the Company and other Debtors filed with the Bankruptcy Court a proposed Plan of Reorganization (as amended on June 5, 2013, the Plan) and related Disclosure Statement (herein so called). On June 7, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the Disclosure Statement for the Plan dated June 5, 2013. The Plan contains provisions for the treatment of equity interests in, and prepetition claims against, AMR and the other Debtors. The Plan also contemplates a business combination of AMR and US Airways Group, Inc. (referred to herein as the Merger). See Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. The Plan has been submitted to the Debtors' stakeholders and is subject to acceptance by the requisite majorities of empowered stakeholders under the Bankruptcy Code and approval by the Bankruptcy Court. See below for further information on the plan of reorganization. The Plan and Disclosure Statement and the information contained therein are not incorporated in this Form 10-Q.

The Company’s Chapter 11 Cases followed an extended effort by the Company to restructure its business to strengthen its competitive and financial position. However, the Company’s substantial cost disadvantage compared to its larger competitors, all of which restructured their costs and debt through Chapter 11, became increasingly untenable given the accelerating impact of global economic uncertainty and resulting revenue instability, volatile and rising fuel prices, and intensifying competitive challenges.

Notwithstanding any indications of value that may be contained in the Plan, no assurance can be given as to the value that ultimately may be ascribed to the Debtors' various prepetition liabilities and other securities. The Company cannot predict what the ultimate value of any of its or the other Debtors' securities may be. Trading in the Company's common stock and certain debt securities on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) was suspended on January 5, 2012, and the Company's common stock and such debt securities were delisted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) from the NYSE on January 30, 2012. On January 5, 2012, the Company's common stock began trading under the symbol “AAMRQ” on the OTCQB marketplace, operated by OTC Markets Group ( www.otcmarkets.com ).

General Information

Notices to Creditors; Effect of Automatic Stay. The Debtors have notified all known current or potential creditors that the Chapter 11 Cases were filed. Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of the Debtors’ Chapter 11 Cases automatically enjoined, or stayed, the continuation of most judicial or administrative proceedings or filing of other actions against the Debtors or their property to recover on, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example, most creditor actions to obtain possession of property from the Debtors, or to create, perfect or enforce any lien against the property of the Debtors, or to collect on monies owed or otherwise exercise rights or remedies with respect to a prepetition claim, are enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay as to any such claim. Vendors are being paid for goods furnished and services provided after the Petition Date in the ordinary course of business.

Table of Contents

Appointment of Creditors’ Committee. On December 5, 2011, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Creditors’ Committee (Creditors' Committee) for the Chapter 11 Cases.

Retirement and Life Insurance Benefits. See Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding modifications to retirement and life insurance benefits.

Rejection of Executory Contracts. Under section 365 and other relevant sections of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may assume, assume and assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, including, without limitation, agreements relating to aircraft and aircraft engines (collectively, Aircraft Property) and leases of real property, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and certain other conditions. As of June 30, 2013 , the Bankruptcy Court had entered orders granting the Debtors' motions to assume 543 , assume and assign one , terminate one , and reject 12 unexpired leases of non-residential real property and had entered various orders extending, by the Debtors' agreement with certain landlords, the date by which the Debtors must assume or reject an additional 14 unexpired leases of non-residential real property.

On April 3, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving a stipulation providing that, among other things, (i) the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) will be treated as general unsecured claims, (ii) the Debtors may continue to use any premises and improvements at JFK or LaGuardia Airport financed by the 1990 or 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds, (iii) the Debtors will assume the leases at JFK that currently relate to the 2002 and 2005 series of special facility revenue bonds, and (iv) the Debtors' use of premises at JFK will continue to be governed by those leases as well as any other leases that may apply (including leases with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey). As a result, the Company expects a claim of approximately $171 million relating to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds, of which $124 million has been previously accrued, plus post-petition interest.

In general, rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease is treated as a prepetition breach of the executory contract or unexpired lease in question and, subject to certain exceptions, relieves the Debtors from performing their future obligations under such executory contract or unexpired lease but entitles the contract counterparty or lessor to a prepetition general unsecured claim for damages caused by such deemed breach. Counterparties to such rejected contracts or leases have the right to file claims against the Debtors’ estate for such damages. Generally, the assumption of an executory contract or unexpired lease requires the Debtors to cure existing defaults under such executory contract or unexpired lease.

Any description of an executory contract or unexpired lease elsewhere in these Notes or in the report to which these Notes are attached, including where applicable the Debtors’ express termination rights or a quantification of their obligations, must be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by, any rights the Debtors or counterparties have under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtors expect that liabilities subject to compromise and resolution in the Chapter 11 Cases will arise in the future as a result of damage claims created by the Debtors’ rejection of various executory contracts and unexpired leases. Due to the uncertain nature of many of the potential rejection claims, the magnitude of such claims is not reasonably estimable at this time. Such claims may be material (see “Liabilities Subject to Compromise” in Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

Special Protection Applicable to Leases and Secured Financing of Aircraft and Aircraft Equipment. Notwithstanding the general discussion above of the impact of the automatic stay, under section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code, beginning 60 days after filing a petition under Chapter 11, certain secured parties, lessors and conditional sales vendors may have a right to take possession of certain qualifying Aircraft Property that is leased or subject to a security interest or conditional sale contract, unless the Debtors, subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court, agree to perform under the applicable agreement, and cure any defaults as provided in section 1110 (other than defaults of a kind specified in section 365(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code). Taking such action does not preclude the Debtors from later rejecting the applicable lease or abandoning the Aircraft Property subject to the related security agreement, or from later seeking to renegotiate the terms of the related financing.

The Debtors may extend the 60-day period by agreement of the relevant financing party, with Bankruptcy Court approval. In the absence of an agreement or cure as described above or such an extension, the financing party may take possession of the Aircraft Property and enforce its contractual rights or remedies to sell, lease or otherwise retain or dispose of such equipment.

The 60-day period under section 1110 in the Chapter 11 Cases expired on January 27, 2012. In accordance with the Bankruptcy Court’s Order Authorizing the Debtors to (i) Enter into Agreements Under Section 1110(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, (ii) Enter into Stipulations to Extend the Time to Comply with Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code and (iii) File Redacted Section 1110(b) Stipulations, dated December 23, 2011, the Debtors have entered into agreements to extend the automatic stay or agreed to perform and cure defaults under financing agreements with respect to certain aircraft in their fleet and other Aircraft Property. The Debtors have reached agreement on revised terms with respect to substantially all of the aircraft for which the Debtors expect to negotiate revised terms, subject in a number of instances to certain conditions, including reaching agreement on definitive documentation.

Table of Contents

The ultimate outcome of these negotiations cannot be predicted with certainty. To the extent the Debtors are unable to reach definitive agreements with Aircraft Property financing parties, those parties may seek to repossess the subject Aircraft Property.

Magnitude of Potential Claims. On February 27, 2012, the Debtors filed with the Bankruptcy Court schedules and statements of financial affairs setting forth, among other things, the assets and liabilities of the Debtors, subject to the assumptions filed in connection therewith. All of the schedules are subject to further amendment or modification.

Bankruptcy Rule 3003(c)(3) requires the Bankruptcy Court to fix the time within which proofs of claim must be filed in a Chapter 11 case pursuant to section 501 of the Bankruptcy Code. This Bankruptcy Rule also provides that any creditor who asserts a claim against the Debtors that arose prior to the Petition Date and whose claim (i) is not listed on the Debtors' schedules or (ii) is listed on the schedules as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated, must file a proof of claim. On May 4, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order that established July 16, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) (the Bar Date) as the deadline to file proofs of claim against any Debtor. More information regarding the filing of proofs of claim can be obtained at www.amrcaseinfo.com. Information on this website is not incorporated into or otherwise made a part of this report.

As of July 10, 2013 , approximately 13,500 claims totaling about $290 billion have been filed with the Bankruptcy Court against the Debtors. Of those claims, approximately 360 claims aggregating approximately $66 million were filed after the Bar Date. We expect new and amended claims to be filed in the future, including claims amended to assign values to claims originally filed with no designated value. We intend to dispute the claims filed after the Bar Date as not having been filed timely and in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code. We have identified, and we expect to continue to identify, many claims that we believe should be disallowed by the Bankruptcy Court because they are duplicative, are without merit, are overstated or for other reasons. As of July 10, 2013 , the Bankruptcy Court has disallowed approximately $116 billion of claims and has not yet ruled on our other objections to claims, the disputed portions of which aggregate to an additional $1.1 billion . We expect to continue to file objections in the future. Because the process of analyzing and objecting to claims is ongoing, the amount of disallowed claims may increase significantly in the future. The Debtors have recorded amounts for claims for which there was sufficient information to estimate the claim.

Differences between amounts scheduled by the Debtors and claims by creditors will be investigated and resolved in connection with the claims resolution process. In light of the expected number of creditors, the claims resolution process may take considerable time to complete. Accordingly, the ultimate number and amount of allowed claims is not presently known, nor can the ultimate recovery with respect to allowed claims be presently ascertained.

Collective Bargaining Agreements. Section 1113(c) of the Bankruptcy Code provides a process for the modification and/or rejection of collective bargaining agreements (CBAs). Through this process, American was able to achieve new CBAs with each of its unions (TWU, APFA and APA), covering nine unionized work groups.

In September 2012, the Bankruptcy Court authorized American to reject its pilot CBA, and thereafter American began implementing certain terms and conditions of employment for pilots. American and the APA continued to negotiate in good faith toward a new pilot agreement, and those negotiations resulted in a new pilot CBA that was approved by the Bankruptcy Court on December 19, 2012. A small group of American pilots is appealing the Bankruptcy Court's decisions granting American's request to reject the pilot CBA and approving the new pilot CBA, and those appeals are pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

American Eagle Airlines, Inc. (AMR Eagle) also engaged in the Section 1113(c) process with its unions, and ultimately achieved new CBAs with its unions, including AFA, ALPA and all four TWU-represented work groups.

In addition, American's pilots, flight attendants, and ground employee unions and the US Airways, Inc. pilots union have agreed to new terms for CBAs, effective upon the closing of the proposed Merger with US Airways Group Inc. (see Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Merger). Separately, US Airways entered into a new CBA with the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (the “AFA”) that includes support for the Merger. American's unions representing pilots and flight attendants are working with their counterparts at US Airways, Inc. to determine representation and single agreement protocols to be used to integrate the pilots and flight attendants workforces after the Merger. The TWU reached agreement with its counterpart at US Airways (the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM)) to jointly represent three groups of ground employees (Mechanic and Related, Fleet Service and Stores) following the Merger (subject to certification by the NMB), and on a process for integrating these workgroups, and one other, following the Merger.

Filing of Plan of Reorganization, Disclosure Statement and Form S-4. On April 15, 2013, the Company and other Debtors filed with the Bankruptcy Court the Plan and Disclosure Statement , which contemplate that AMR will emerge from Chapter 11 and engage in the Merger (as further described in Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The Plan addresses various subjects with respect to the Debtors, including the resolution of pre-petition obligations as well as the capital structure and corporate governance after exit from the Chapter 11 Cases. The Plan further provides that, upon the effectiveness of the Plan

Table of Contents

and the Merger, which are anticipated to occur contemporaneously, all shares of existing AMR common stock and other equity interests in AMR will be canceled and any rights with respect thereto will cease to exist, subject to the right to receive distributions pursuant to the Plan. The Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the Disclosure Statement on June 7, 2013, as discussed more fully below.

Generally, for purposes of the Plan, all 20 Debtors will be “substantively consolidated” into three nodes, consisting of: (i) AMR Debtors, (ii) American Debtors, and (iii) Eagle Debtors. As among the AMR Debtors, the American Debtors, and the Eagle Debtors, the Plan will separately classify creditor claims. However, pursuant to the compromises incorporated into the Plan relating to certain inter-creditor issues and the treatment of intercompany claims among the Debtors, general unsecured claims of similar rank and priority will be treated the same under the Plan regardless of the Debtor against which such claim was filed.

The Plan contains provisions related to the treatment of prepetition unsecured claims against the Debtors and equity interests in AMR as described in the Plan and Disclosure Statement and in Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under "Support Agreement and Term Sheet."

On June 7, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court entered the order approving the Disclosure Statement. The Court also authorized American to begin soliciting votes on the Plan from creditors and stockholders. Solicitation packages were distributed by June 20, 2013. The Company and the other Debtors have until July 29, 2013 to solicit and obtain acceptances for the Plan. The hearing before the Court to consider confirmation of the Plan is scheduled for August 15, 2013. To be accepted by holders of claims against the Debtors, the Plan must be approved by at least one-half in number and two-thirds in dollar amount of claims actually voting in each impaired class. Under certain circumstances set forth in Section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Court may confirm a plan even if the plan has not been accepted by all impaired classes of claims and equity interests. A class of claims or equity interest that does not receive or retain any property under the plan on account of such claims or interest is deemed to have voted to reject the plan. The precise requirements and evidentiary showing for confirming a plan notwithstanding its rejection by one or more impaired classes of claims or equity interests depends upon a number of factors, including the status and seniority of the claims or equity interests in the rejecting class (i.e. secured claims or unsecured claims, subordinated or senior claims, preferred or common stock).

On April 15, 2013, the Company filed a Form S-4 registration statement (the Form S-4 Registration Statement) with the SEC to register the shares of common stock of AMR, which following the Merger will be renamed American Airlines Group Inc. (herein, the AAG Common Stock), to be issued to stockholders of US Airways Group, Inc. (US Airways Group) as consideration in the Merger in exchange for their US Airways Group common stock. The SEC declared the Form S-4 Registration Statement, as amended, effective on June 10, 2013. The AAG Common Stock cannot be issued to US Airways Group stockholders until the US Airways Group stockholders vote to approve the Merger, the Plan is confirmed and the Plan and Merger are consummated.

Nothing contained in this Form 10-Q is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, a solicitation for a vote on the Plan. The Plan will become effective only if it receives the requisite approval and is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court. There can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will confirm the Plan or that the Plan will be implemented successfully. See “Additional Information” below.

Merger Agreement. See Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the Merger Agreement.

Availability and Utilization of Net Operating Losses . A discussion of the potential impact of the Plan on the availability and utilization of net operating losses (and alternative minimum tax credits) after the Debtors' emergence from Chapter 11 is contained in the Disclosure Statement. As described therein, the Debtors reasonably anticipate taking advantage of the special bankruptcy rule in section 382(l)(5) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, which generally applies to an ownership change in bankruptcy that involves the retention or receipt of at least half of the stock of the reorganized debtor by its shareholders and/or qualified creditors.

On April 11, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court issued a Revised Final Order Establishing Notification Procedures for Substantial Claimholders and Equity Security Holders and Approving Restrictions on Certain Transfers of Interests in the Debtors' Estates (the "Revised Order"), which restricts trading in the Company's common stock and establishes certain procedures and potential restrictions with respect to the transfer of claims (the “Revised Procedures”). The order is intended to prevent, or otherwise institute procedures and notification requirements with respect to, certain transfers of AMR common stock and unsecured claims against the Debtors that could impair the ability of the Debtors to use their net operating loss carryovers and certain other tax attributes on a reorganized basis.

In accordance with the Revised Procedures, the Debtors established in the Debtors' proposed Disclosure Statement as filed on April 15, 2013, an initial date by which holders of unsecured claims (or in certain cases, group of holders) that beneficially owned

Table of Contents

in excess of a threshold amount as of May 24, 2013 were required to file a Notice of Substantial Claim Ownership. The reporting deadline was May 31, 2013, and the threshold amount was $190 million of unsecured claims or such lesser amount as set forth in the proposed Disclosure Statement. The Disclosure Statement as approved on June 7, 2013 establishes in accordance with the Revised Procedures a second (final) date by which holders of unsecured claims (or in certain cases, group of holders) that beneficially own in excess of a threshold amount as of July 1, 2013 must file a Notice of Substantial Claim Ownership (regardless of whether such holder(s) filed a Notice as of the first reporting deadline). The final reporting deadline was July 8, 2013. The threshold amount is $190 million of unsecured claims or such lesser amount as set forth in the approved Disclosure Statement, namely such lesser amount which, when added to certain specified interests, including stock, in AMR or US Airways Group, would result in such holder holding the “Applicable Percentage,” generally 4.5 percent , of the reorganized Debtors. In connection with the filing of a Notice of Substantial Claim Ownership, a holder must indicate if it will agree to refrain from acquiring additional AMR and US Airways Group common stock and such other specified interests until after the effective date of the Debtors' Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, and to dispose of any such interests acquired since February 22, 2013. This can affect the manner in which the Revised Procedures apply to certain holders. Based, in part, on the Notices of Substantial Claim Ownership received, the Debtors thereafter will evaluate whether it will be necessary for them to seek an order in accordance with the “sell-down” procedures of the Revised Order, potentially requiring any “Substantial Claimholder” to sell down a portion of its unsecured claims to reasonably ensure that the requirements of section 382(l)(5) will be satisfied.

After July 1, 2013, any acquisition of unsecured claims by a Substantial Claimholder or a person (or in certain cases, group of persons) that would become a Substantial Claimholder as a result of the contemplated transaction is not permitted unless the potential transferee files a Claims Acquisition Request at least 10 business days prior to the proposed transfer date and receives written approval from the Debtors.

The Revised Procedures did not alter the procedures applicable with respect to “Substantial Equityholders,” namely persons who are, or as a result of a transaction would become, the beneficial owner of approximately 4.5 percent of the outstanding shares of AMR common stock.

Any acquisition, disposition, or other transfer of equity or claims in violation of the restrictions set forth in the Revised Order will be null and void ab initio and/or subject to sanctions as an act in violation of the automatic stay under sections 105(a) and 362 of the Bankruptcy Code. A further explanation of the Revised Procedures is contained in the Disclosure Statement.

Liabilities Subject to Compromise

The following table summarizes the components of liabilities subject to compromise included on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 :



(in millions)
	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Long-term debt	$	1,175		$	1,198
Estimated allowed claims on aircraft lease and debt obligations and facility lease and bond obligations	4,078			3,716
Pension and postretirement benefits	1,219			1,250
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	387			442
Other	(12		)	—
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	6,847		$	6,606

Table of Contents

Long-term debt, including undersecured debt, classified as subject to compromise as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of (in millions):



	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness due through 2023 (effective rates from 1.00% - 10.00% at June 30, 2013)	$	149	$	172
6.00%—8.50% special facility revenue bonds due through 2036	186		186
6.25% senior convertible notes due 2014	460		460
9.00%—10.20% debentures due through 2021	214		214
7.88%—10.55% notes due through 2039	166		166
	$	1,175	$	1,198

Liabilities subject to compromise refers to prepetition obligations which may be impacted by the Chapter 11 reorganization process. These amounts represent the Debtors’ current estimate of known or potential prepetition obligations to be resolved in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases.

In accordance with ASC 852, substantially all of the Company’s unsecured debt has been classified as liabilities subject to compromise. Additionally, certain of the Company’s undersecured debt instruments have also been classified as liabilities subject to compromise.

As a result of the modifications to the retirement benefits as discussed in Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, a portion of the pension and postretirement benefits liability, primarily relating to retiree medical and other benefits, was classified as liabilities subject to compromise.

Differences between liabilities the Debtors have estimated and the claims filed, or to be filed, will be investigated and resolved in connection with the claims resolution process. The Company will continue to evaluate these liabilities throughout the Chapter 11 Cases and adjust amounts as necessary. Such adjustments may be material. In light of the expected number of creditors, the claims resolution process may take considerable time to complete. Accordingly, the ultimate number and amount of allowed claims is not presently known.

Reorganization Items, net

Reorganization items refer to revenues, expenses (including professional fees), realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the Chapter 11 Cases. The following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 :



(in millions)
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ^(1)(2)(3)	83		158		219		1,513
Professional fees	40		72		79		117
Other	1		—		(14	)	—
Total reorganization items, net	$	124	$	230	284		1,630

(1)

Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court to reject or modify such financing and the Debtors believe that it is probable the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. Modifications of the financings related to certain aircraft remain subject to conditions, including reaching agreement on definitive documentation. See above, “Special Protection Applicable to Leases and Secured Financing of Aircraft and Aircraft Equipment,” for further information.

Table of Contents

(2)

Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to entry of orders treating as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the treatment of claims with respect to facility agreements when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court and the Debtors believe that it is probable that the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. See above, “Rejection of Executory Contracts,” for further information.

(3)

Pursuant to the Support Agreement, as defined and further described in Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the Debtors agreed to allow certain post-petition unsecured claims on obligations. As a result, during the first six months of 2013, the Company recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $143 million and allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at John F. Kennedy International Airport, which is included in the table above.

Claims related to reorganization items are reflected in liabilities subject to compromise on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2013 .

2. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with United States (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated. Results of operations for the periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the entire year. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of AMR and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including (i) its principal subsidiary American and (ii) its regional airline subsidiary, AMR Eagle. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements also include the accounts of variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in AMR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 20, 2013, as amended by the Form 10-K/A filed on April 16, 2013 (2012 Form 10-K).

In accordance with GAAP, the Debtors have applied ASC 852 “Reorganizations” (ASC 852), in preparing the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. ASC 852 requires that the financial statements, for periods subsequent to the Chapter 11 Cases, distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain revenues, expenses (including professional fees), realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the Chapter 11 Cases are recorded in reorganization items, net on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. In addition, prepetition obligations that may be impacted by the Chapter 11 reorganization process have been classified on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet in liabilities subject to compromise. These liabilities are reported at the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts.

Certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries were not part of the Chapter 11 filings. Since the non-US subsidiaries not part of the bankruptcy filing do not have significant transactions, we do not separately disclose the condensed combined financial statements of such non-U.S. subsidiaries in accordance with the requirements of reorganization accounting.

These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have also been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Debtors be unable to continue as a going concern.

As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, the satisfaction of our liabilities and funding of ongoing operations are subject to uncertainty and, accordingly, there is a substantial doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements do not purport to reflect or provide for the consequences of the Chapter 11 Cases, other than as set forth under “liabilities subject to compromise” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and “income (loss) before reorganization items” and “reorganization items, net” on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations (see Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). In particular, the financial statements do not purport to show (1) as to assets, their realizable value on a liquidation basis or their availability to satisfy liabilities; (2) as to prepetition liabilities, the amounts that may be allowed for claims or contingencies, or the status and priority thereof; (3) as to shareowners’ equity accounts, the effect of any changes that may be made to the Debtors’ capitalization; or (4) as to operations, the effect of any changes that may be made to the Debtors’ business.

Table of Contents

3. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees

American had total aircraft acquisition commitments as of June 30, 2013 as follows:



		Boeing				Airbus
		737 Family	737 MAX	777-300 ER	787 Family	A320 Family	A320 NEO	Total
Remainder of 2013	Purchase	13	—	2	—	—	—	15
	Lease	—	—	—	—	20	—	20
2014	Purchase	20	—	6	2	—	—	28
2014	Lease	—	—	—	—	35	—	35
2015	Purchase	—	—	2	11	—	—	13
2015	Lease	20	—	—	—	30	—	50
2016	Purchase	—	—	2	13	—	—	15
2016	Lease	20	—	—	—	25	—	45
2017	Purchase	—	3	—	9	—	10	22
2017	Lease	20	—	—	—	20	—	40
2018 and beyond	Purchase	—	97	—	7	—	120	224
2018 and beyond	Lease	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	Purchase	33	100	12	42	—	130	317
Total	Lease	60	—	—	—	130	—	190

As of June 30, 2013 , and subject to assumption of certain of the related agreements, payments for the above purchase commitments and certain engines will approximate $ 0.8 billion in the remainder of 2013, $ 2.0 billion in 2014, $ 1.7 billion in 2015, $ 2.0 billion in 2016, $ 2.1 billion in 2017, and $ 12.2 billion for 2018 and beyond. These amounts are net of purchase deposits currently held by the manufacturers. American has granted Boeing a security interest in American’s purchase deposits with Boeing. The Company’s purchase deposits totaled $ 696 million as of June 30, 2013 .

As of June 30, 2013 , and subject to assumption of certain of the related agreements, total future lease payments for all leased aircraft, including aircraft not yet delivered, will approximate $ 427 million in the remainder of 2013 , $ 979 million in 2014, $ 1.2 billion in 2015, $ 1.4 billion in 2016, $ 1.6 billion in 2017, and $ 12.2 billion in 2018 and beyond.

Capacity Purchase Agreements with Third Party Regional Airlines

During 2012, American entered into capacity purchase agreements with SkyWest Airlines, Inc. (SkyWest) and with ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. (ExpressJet), both wholly owned subsidiaries of SkyWest, Inc., to provide 50-seat regional jet feed. Both airlines operate the services under the American Eagle ^® brand. SkyWest began service from Los Angeles International Airport on November 15, 2012, and ExpressJet began service from Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport on February 14, 2013. In addition, Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. (Chautauqua) continues to operate under the brand AmericanConnection ^® under a capacity purchase agreement with American.

On January 23, 2013, American entered into a 12 year capacity purchase agreement with Republic Airline Inc. (Republic), a subsidiary of Republic Airways Holdings, to provide large regional jet flying. Through the agreement, Republic will acquire 47 Embraer E-175 aircraft featuring a two-class cabin with 12 first class seats and 64 seats in the main cabin. The aircraft, which will fly under the American Eagle ^® brand, will begin phasing into operation at approximately two to three aircraft per month beginning in August 2013. All 47 aircraft are expected to be in operation by the first quarter of 2015.

As of June 30, 2013 , American's minimum fixed obligations under its capacity purchase agreements with third party regional airlines were approximately $200 million in the remainder of 2013, $522 million in 2014, $671 million in 2015, $671 million in 2016, $515 million in 2017 and $4.3 billion in 2018 and beyond. These obligations contemplate minimum levels of flying by the third party airlines under the respective agreements and also reflect assumptions regarding certain costs associated with the minimum levels of flying such as the cost of fuel, insurance, catering, property tax and landing fees. Accordingly, actual payments under these agreements could differ materially from the minimum fixed obligations set forth above.

Other

As a result of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, attempts to prosecute, collect, secure or enforce remedies with respect to prepetition claims against the Debtors are subject to the automatic stay provisions of Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, except in such

Table of Contents

cases where the Bankruptcy Court has entered an order modifying or lifting the automatic stay. Notwithstanding the general application of the automatic stay described above, governmental authorities, both domestic and foreign, may determine to continue actions brought under their regulatory powers. Therefore, the automatic stay may have no effect on certain matters, and the Debtors cannot predict the impact, if any, that its Chapter 11 Cases might have on its commitments and obligations.

4. Depreciation and Amortization

Accumulated depreciation of owned equipment and property at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $ 11.0 billion and $ 10.6 billion , respectively. Accumulated amortization of equipment and property under capital leases at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $ 232 million and $ 205 million , respectively.

5. Income Taxes

The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance increased from $ 4.4 billion as of December 31, 2012 to $ 4.5 billion as of June 30, 2013 , including the impact of comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and changes from other adjustments. These other adjustments include the realization of an income tax expense credit of approximately $22 million recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2013 by the Company as a result of passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. There was no amount of adjustment recorded by the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Under current accounting rules, the Company is required to consider all items (including items recorded in other comprehensive income) in determining the amount of tax benefit that results from a loss from continuing operations and that should be allocated to continuing operations. Due to the significant volatility of items impacting other comprehensive income on a quarterly basis, the Company generally does not record any such tax benefit allocation until all items impacting other comprehensive income are known for the annual period. Thus, any such interim tax benefit allocation may subsequently be subject to reversal.

6. Indebtedness and Leases

Long-term debt classified as not subject to compromise consisted of (in millions):



	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness due through 2023 (effective rates from 1.00%-13.00% at June 30, 2013)	$	2,925	$	3,297
Enhanced equipment trust certificates (EETC) due through 2025 (rates from 4.00%-10.375% at June 30, 2013)	2,308		1,741
6.00%-8.50% special facility revenue bonds due through 2031	1,314		1,313
7.50% senior secured notes due 2016	1,000		1,000
Senior secured credit facility due 2019 (rate of 4.75% at June 30, 2013)	1,045		—
AAdvantage Miles advance purchase (net of discount of $46 million) (effective rate 8.3%)	693		772
	9,285		8,123
Less current maturities	1,298		1,388
Long-term debt, less current maturities	$	7,987	$	6,735

The financings listed in the table above are considered not subject to compromise. For information regarding the liabilities subject to compromise, see Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

The Company’s future long-term debt and operating lease payments have changed as its ordered aircraft are delivered and such deliveries have been financed. As of June 30, 2013 , maturities of long-term debt (including sinking fund requirements) for the next five years are:



Years Ending December 31 (in millions)	Principal Not Subject to Compromise		Principal Subject to Compromise		Total Principal Amount
Remainder of 2013	$	867	$	174	$	1,041
2014	897		610		1,507
2015	796		4		800
2016	1,790		64		1,854
2017	530		28		558

Principal Not Subject to Compromise and Subject to Compromise includes payments not made due to the Chapter 11 Cases of $451 million and $154 million , respectively.

Future minimum lease payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of a year as of June 30, 2013 , were: remainder of 2013 – $579 million , 2014 – $1.1 billion , 2015 – $1.0 billion , 2016 – $947 million , 2017 – $903 million , and 2018 and beyond – $5.7 billion . As of June 30, 2013 , $95 million and $302 million are included on the accompanying balance sheet in Liabilities Subject to Compromise and Accrued liabilities and other liabilities and deferred credits, respectively, relating to rent expense being recorded in advance of future operating lease payments.

As of June 30, 2013 , AMR had issued guarantees covering approximately $ 1.5 billion of American’s tax-exempt bond debt (and interest thereon) and $ 5.1 billion of American’s secured debt (and interest thereon). American had issued guarantees covering approximately $ 842 million of AMR’s unsecured debt (and interest thereon).

Financing Transactions

On March 12, 2013, American closed its private offering of two tranches of enhanced equipment trust certificates (the Series 2013-1A/B EETCs) in the aggregate face amount of $664 million . The Series 2013-1A/B EETCs are comprised of a senior tranche of Class A Certificates with an interest rate of 4.00% per annum and a final expected distribution date of July 15, 2025, and a junior tranche of Class B Certificates with an interest rate of 5.625% per annum and a final expected distribution date of January 15, 2021. The Series 2013-1A/B EETCs represent an interest in the assets of two separate pass through trusts, each of which hold equipment notes issued or expected to be issued by American. Interest on the issued and outstanding equipment notes will be payable semiannually on January 15 and July 15 of each year, commencing on July 15, 2013, and principal on such equipment notes is scheduled for payment on January 15 and July 15 of certain years, commencing on January 15, 2014. As of June 30, 2013, the equipment notes are secured by eight currently owned Boeing 737-823 aircraft, one currently owned Boeing 777-223ER aircraft, and three currently owned Boeing 777-323ER aircraft and are expected to be secured by one new Boeing 777-323ER aircraft currently scheduled for delivery to American during July 2013. The certificates were offered in the U.S. to qualified institutional buyers, as defined in, and in reliance on, Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).

On June 5, 2013, American closed its private offering of Class C enhanced equipment trust certificates (the Series 2013-1C EETCs) in the aggregate face amount of $120 million . The Series 2013-1C EETCs generally rank junior to the Series 2013-1A/B EETCs. The Series 2013-1C EETCs were issued with an interest rate of 6.125% per annum and a final expected distribution date of July 15, 2018. The 2013-1C EETCs represent an interest in the assets of a separate pass through trust, which will hold certain equipment notes issued or expected to be issued by American. The Series 2013-1C EETCs are secured by the same aircraft securing the Series 2013-1A/B EETCs. The certificates were offered in the U.S. to qualified institutional buyers, as defined in, and in reliance on, Rule 144A under the Securities Act.

On June 27, 2013 American Airlines and AMR Corporation entered into a Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with certain lenders. The Credit Agreement provides for a $1.05 billion term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) and a $1 billion revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Facility” and, together with the Term Loan Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). The Credit Facilities are secured obligations of American and guaranteed by AMR. As of June 30, 2013, American had borrowed $1.05 billion under the Term Loan Facility. The Revolving Facility provides that American may from time to time borrow, repay and reborrow loans thereunder and have letters of credit issued thereunder in an aggregate amount outstanding at any time of up to $1 billion .

Upon consummation of the Merger, US Airways Group and US Airways, Inc. will be required to join the Credit Facilities as guarantors. Following the joinder, certain minimum dollar-thresholds under the negative and financial covenants in the Credit Facilities automatically will be increased.

Table of Contents

Except under certain circumstances, American may not make drawings under the Revolving Facility until the date (the “Plan Effective Date”) on which certain conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement have been satisfied and the effective date has occurred under (i) a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization that does not differ from the plan of reorganization filed with the Bankruptcy Court on April 15, 2013 in any manner adverse to the lenders without consent (the “Approved Plan of Reorganization”) or (ii) an alternative plan of reorganization that satisfies certain financial metrics set forth in the Credit Agreement (an “Alternative Plan”).

The Term Loan Facility and Revolving Facility mature on June 27, 2019 and June 27, 2018, respectively, unless otherwise extended by the applicable parties, except that if the Plan Effective Date has not occurred on or before June 27, 2014 under the Approved Plan of Reorganization or an Alternative Plan, then the Term Loan Facility and Revolving Facility mature on June 27, 2014, and if the effective date under a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization occurs under a plan of reorganization that is neither the Approved Plan of Reorganization nor an Alternative Plan, then the Term Loan Facility and Revolving Facility mature on such date.

Voluntary prepayments may be made by American at any time, with a premium of 1.00% applicable to certain prepayments made prior to the date that is six months following June 27, 2013. Mandatory prepayments at par of term loans and revolving loans are required to the extent necessary to comply with American's covenants regarding the collateral coverage ratio and certain dispositions of collateral. In addition, if a “change of control” (as defined in the Credit Agreement) occurs with respect to AMR, American will be required to repay at par the loans outstanding under the Credit Facilities and terminate the Revolving Facility. The Merger would not constitute a change of control.

The Credit Facilities bear interest at an index rate plus an applicable index margin or, at American's option, LIBOR (subject to a floor of 1.00% ) plus an applicable LIBOR margin. The applicable LIBOR margins are 3.75% and 3.50% for borrowings under the Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Facility, respectively. Subject to certain limitations and exceptions, the Credit Facilities are secured by certain route authorities, slots and foreign gate leaseholds utilized by American in providing scheduled air carrier service between the United States and South America countries, specifically Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela.

The Credit Facilities contain events of default customary for similar financings, including cross-acceleration to other material indebtedness. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the outstanding obligations under the Credit Facilities may be accelerated and become due and payable immediately. The Credit Facilities also include affirmative, negative, and financial covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of AMR and its restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends and make certain other payments, make certain investments, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens on the collateral, dispose of the collateral, enter into certain affiliate transactions and engage in certain business activities, in each case subject to certain exceptions. In addition, AMR must maintain a minimum aggregate liquidity (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of $1.5 billion prior to the Merger and $2.0 billion on and following the Merger.

In June 2013, American also remarketed approximately $216 million of Tulsa Municipal Airport Revenue Refunding Bonds Trust Series 2001A, 2001B, and 2000B due June 1, 2035 (Series 2000B) and December 1, 2035 (Series 2001 A&B).

The Company filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court on October 9, 2012, requesting entry of an order authorizing American to, among other things: (i) obtain postpetition financing in an amount of up to $1.5 billion secured on a first priority basis by, among other things, up to 41 Boeing 737-823 aircraft, 14 Boeing 757-223 aircraft, one Boeing 767-323ER aircraft and 19 Boeing 777-223ER aircraft as part of a new enhanced equipment trust certificate (EETC) financing (the Refinancing EETC) to be offered pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and (ii) use cash on hand (including proceeds of the Refinancing EETC) to indefeasibly repay the existing prepetition obligations secured by such aircraft, as applicable, which are currently financed through, as the case may be, an EETC financing entered into by American in July 2009 (the Series 2009-1 Pass Through Certificates), a secured notes financing entered into by American in July 2009 (the 2009-2 Senior Secured Notes) and an EETC financing entered into by American in October 2011 (the Series 2011-2 Pass Through Certificates and, together with the Series 2009-1 Pass Through Certificates and the 2009-2 Senior Secured Notes, the Existing Financings), in each case without the payment of any make-whole amount or other premium or prepayment penalty. American expects the Refinancing EETC structure to be substantially similar to the structure of the Series 2011-2 Pass Through Certificates, other than the economic terms (such as the interest rate) and certain terms and conditions to be in effect during the Chapter 11 Cases.

The Bankruptcy Court approved the motion on January 17, 2013 and entered an order (the EETC Order) to such effect on February 1, 2013. The trustees for the Existing Financings have appealed the EETC Order and judgments rendered in certain related adversary proceedings. The appeals have been briefed and fully submitted and oral arguments were heard on June 20, 2013. The Company intends to continue to assert vigorously its rights to repay the Existing Financings without the payment of any make-whole amount or other premium or prepayment penalty, and is considering all of its options, including the payment of the Existing Financings and closing the Refinancing EETC notwithstanding such appeal. There can be no assurance that the Refinancing EETC will be completed on acceptable terms, if at all, and, although the Company can opt to reinstate the Existing Financings prior to emergence, if the Company determines to repay rather than reinstate the Existing Financings prior to emergence, it is possible that

Table of Contents

it could lose the appeal and be required to pay make-whole amounts with respect to the Existing Financings. As of June 30, 2013, such make-whole amounts would have exceeded $400 million in the aggregate.

On June 27, 2013, American commenced tender offers to purchase for cash any and all of the Series 2009-1 Pass Through Certificates, the Series 2009-2 Senior Secured Notes and the Series 2011-2 Pass Through Certificates (collectively, the Existing Securities). The tender offers expire on August 2, 2013, unless extended or earlier terminated. There can be no assurance that any such tender offers will be successful.

Sale-leaseback Arrangements

American has arranged sale-leaseback financings with certain leasing companies for 33 Boeing 737-800 aircraft scheduled to be delivered from July 2013 through 2014. The financings of each aircraft under these arrangements are subject to certain terms and conditions. In addition, in some instances, they are also subject to collaboration with the Creditors' Committee and other key stakeholders and to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

During the second quarter, American financed 9 Boeing 737-800 aircraft under sale-leaseback arrangements, which are accounted for as operating leases. These sale-leaseback transactions resulted in gains which are being amortized over the respective remaining lease terms.

Collateral Related Covenants

Certain of American’s debt financing agreements contain loan to value ratio covenants and require American to periodically appraise the collateral. Pursuant to such agreements, if the loan to value ratio exceeds a specified threshold, American is required, as applicable, to subject additional qualifying collateral (which in some cases may include cash collateral), or pay down such financing, in whole or in part, with premium (if any), or pay additional interest on the related indebtedness, as described below.

Table of Contents

Specifically, American is required to meet certain collateral coverage tests on a periodic basis on three financing transactions: (1) 10.5% $450 million Senior Secured Notes due 2012 (the 10.5% Notes), (2) 7.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 (the Senior Secured Notes) and (3) Credit Facilities, as described below:



	10.5% Notes		Senior Secured Notes	Credit Facilities
Frequency of Appraisals	Semi-Annual (April and October)		Semi-Annual (June and December)	Semi-Annual (June and December)
LTV Requirement	43%; failure to meet collateral test requires posting of additional collateral		1.5x Collateral valuation to amount of debt outstanding (67% LTV); failure to meet collateral test results in American paying 2% additional interest until the ratio is at least 1.5x; additional collateral can be posted to meet this requirement	1.6x Collateral valuation to amount of debt outstanding (62.5% LTV); failure to meet collateral test results in American either providing additional collateral or repaying a portion of the Credit Facilities until the ratio is met
LTV as of Last Measurement Date	56.6%		38.7%	18.5%
			Generally, certain route authorities, take-off and landing slots, and rights to airport facilities used by American to operate certain services between the U.S. and London Heathrow, Tokyo Narita/Haneda, and China	Generally, certain route authorities, take-off and landing slots, and rights to airport facilities used by American to operate all services between the U.S. and South America
Collateral Description	143 aircraft consisting of:
	Type	# of Aircraft

	MD-80	74
	B757-200	41
	B767-200ER	3
	B767-300ER	25
	TOTAL	143

At June 30, 2013 , the Company was in compliance with the most recently completed collateral coverage tests for the Senior Secured Notes and the Credit Facilities. As of June 30, 2013 , American had $41 million of cash collateral posted with respect to the 10.5% Notes, which matured in 2012. The Company has not satisfied the debt with respect to the 10.5% Notes due to the ongoing Chapter 11 Cases.

Other

Almost all of the Company’s aircraft assets (including aircraft and aircraft-related assets eligible for the benefits of section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code) are encumbered, and the Company has a very limited quantity of assets which could be used as collateral in financing.

As discussed in Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has been using the benefits afforded by the Bankruptcy Code to restructure the terms of much of its indebtedness and lease obligations. The Company cannot predict at this time the outcome of its efforts to restructure its indebtedness and lease obligations. It is possible that holders of the Company's unsecured indebtedness may lose a portion of their investment depending on the outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases.

7. Fair Value Measurements

The Company utilizes the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The Company’s short-term investments classified as Level 2 primarily utilize broker quotes in a non-active market for valuation of

Table of Contents

these securities. The Company’s fuel derivative contracts, which consist primarily of collars (consisting of a purchased call option and a sold put option) and call spreads (consisting of a purchased call option and a sold call option), are valued using energy and commodity market data which is derived by combining raw inputs with quantitative models and processes to generate forward curves and volatilities. Heating oil, jet fuel and crude oil are the primary underlying commodities in the hedge portfolio. No changes in valuation techniques or inputs occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2013 .

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:



(in millions)	Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2013
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Short-term investments ^{1, 2}
Money market funds	$	1,308	$	1,308	$	—	$	—
Government agency investments	1,476		—		1,476		—
Repurchase investments	222		—		222		—
Corporate obligations	2,017		—		2,017		—
Bank notes / Certificates of deposit / Time deposits	583		—		583		—
	5,606		1,308		4,298		—
Restricted cash and short-term investments ¹	863		863		—		—
Fuel derivative contracts, net ¹	5		—		5		—
Total	$	6,474	$	2,171	$	4,303	$	—

¹ Unrealized gains or losses on short-term investments, restricted cash and short-term investments and derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at each measurement date.

² The Company’s short-term investments mature in one year or less except for $ 350 million of Bank notes, $ 1.4 billion of U.S. Government obligations and $ 782 million of Corporate obligations which have maturity dates exceeding one year.

No significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2013 . The Company’s policy regarding the recording of transfers between levels is to reflect any such transfers at the end of the reporting period.

As of June 30, 2013 , the Company had no exposure to European sovereign debt.

The fair values of the Company’s long-term debt classified as Level 2 were estimated using quoted market prices or discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current estimated incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. All of the Company’s long term debt not classified as subject to compromise is classified as Level 2.

The carrying value and estimated fair values of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, not classified as subject to compromise, were (in millions):



	June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness	2,925		2,873		3,297		3,143
Enhanced equipment trust certificates	2,308		2,379		1,741		1,811
6.0%—8.5% special facility revenue bonds	1,314		1,454		1,313		1,308
7.50% senior secured notes	1,000		1,159		1,000		1,074
Senior secured credit facility due 2019 (rate of 4.75% at June 30, 2013)	1,045		1,050		—		—
AAdvantage Miles advance purchase	693		699		772		779
	$	9,285	$	9,614	$	8,123	$	8,115

Table of Contents

The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, classified as subject to compromise, were (in millions):



	June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness	149		$	130	$	172	$	154
6.0%—8.5% special facility revenue bonds	186		194		186		186
6.25% senior convertible notes	460		525		460		400
9.0%—10.20% debentures	214		238		214		112
7.88%—10.55% notes	166		50		166		33
	$	1,175	$	1,137	$	1,198	$	885

All of the Company’s long term debt classified as subject to compromise is classified as Level 2.

8. Retirement Benefits

The following tables provide the components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in millions):



	Pension Benefits
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	1		$	104		$	2		$	208
Interest cost	163			191			326			382
Expected return on assets	(180		)	(166		)	(360		)	(332		)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost	7			3			14			7
Unrecognized net (gain) loss	23			63			46			124
Net periodic benefit cost	$	14		$	195		$	28		$	389



	Retiree Medical and Other Benefits
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	—		$	15		$	—		$	30
Interest cost	13			38			26			76
Expected return on assets	(4		)	(4		)	(8		)	(8		)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost	(61		)	(7		)	(122		)	(14		)
Unrecognized net (gain) loss	(2		)	(2		)	(4		)	(4		)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	(54	)	$	40		$	(108	)	$	80

The Company is required to make minimum contributions to its defined benefit pension plans under the minimum funding requirements of ERISA, the Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004, the Pension Protection Act of 2006, and the Pension Relief Act of 2010. As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR contributed $44 million to its U.S. defined benefit pension plans during the first six months of 2013 covering post-petition periods. On July 15, 2013, the Company contributed an additional $11 million to its defined benefit pension plans. The Company’s remaining 2013 contributions to its defined benefit pension plans are subject to the Chapter 11 proceedings. Prior to the closing of the Merger (see Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information), AMR and/or its subsidiaries will make all minimum required contributions to each AMR compensation and benefit plan that are required to have been made and were not made prior to the effective date of the Merger. As a result of the Company contributing only the post-petition portion of required contributions, the PBGC filed a lien against certain assets of the Company in 2012.

Table of Contents

Recent Modifications to Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefits

The Company's defined benefit pension plans were frozen effective November 1, 2012. Eligible employees began to receive a replacement benefit under the $uper $aver 401(k) Plan on November 1, 2012.

In December 2012, the Pilot A Plan, a defined benefit plan, was amended to remove the lump-sum option and the installment option forms of benefit effective December 31, 2012. A small group of American pilots is appealing the Bankruptcy Court's decision authorizing American to eliminate the lump sum option and installment option forms of benefit. This is the same group of pilots that is appealing the Bankruptcy Court's decisions authorizing American to reject the pilot CBA and approving the new pilot CBA. All of these appeals have been consolidated, and are pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The Pilot B Plan, a defined contribution plan, was terminated on November 30, 2012. Plan B assets will be distributed to pilots in mid-2013.

On July 6, 2012, the Company commenced an adversary proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court seeking a determination on the issue of vesting for former employees who retired before November 1, 2012 and were eligible for certain retiree medical coverage. The Court held a hearing on January 23, 2013 and has not ruled on this matter as of the date of this report. The Company has been negotiating with the retiree committee since July 2012, seeking a consensual agreement to terminate subsidized retiree medical coverage and life insurance coverage.

As a result of the modifications to the retirement benefits as discussed above, a portion of the pension and postretirement benefits liability, primarily relating to retiree medical and other benefits, was classified as liabilities subject to compromise. See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the breakout of liabilities subject to compromise, including that related to pension and postretirement benefits.

9. Special Charges and Merger Related Expenses

Special Charges

Based on agreements reached with various workgroups in 2012, the Company expects to reduce a total of approximately 10,500 positions. Consequently, during 2012, the Company recorded charges for severance related costs associated with the voluntary and involuntary reductions in certain work groups. The severance charges will be paid through the end of 2013.

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s special charges and the remaining accruals for these charges (in millions) as of June 30, 2013 :



	Facility Exit Costs			Employee Charges			Total
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2012	$	4		$	192		$	196
Special charges	6			13			19
Non-cash charges	(3		)	—			(3		)
Adjustments	(4		)	—			(4		)
Payments	(3		)	(138		)	(141		)
Remaining accrual at June 30, 2013	$	—		$	67		$	67

Merger Related Expenses

Merger related expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 were $6.2 million and $21.6 million , respectively. See Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information on the Merger Agreement.

10. Financial Instruments and Risk Management

As part of the Company’s risk management program, it uses a variety of financial instruments, primarily heating oil, jet fuel, and Brent crude collars (consisting of a purchased call option and a sold put option) and call spreads (consisting of a purchased call option and a sold call option), as cash flow hedges to mitigate commodity price risk. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. As of June 30, 2013 , the Company had fuel derivative contracts outstanding covering 22 million barrels of jet fuel that will be settled over the next 18 months. A deterioration of the Company’s liquidity position and its Chapter 11 filing may negatively affect the Company’s ability to hedge fuel in the future.

Table of Contents

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 , the Company recognized an increase of approximately $ 31 million and $23 million , respectively, in fuel expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to its fuel hedging agreements, including the ineffective portion of the hedges. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 , the Company recognized an increase of approximately $9 million and a decrease of approximately $20 million , respectively, in fuel expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to its fuel hedging agreements, including the ineffective portion of the hedges.The net fair value of the Company’s fuel hedging agreements at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , representing the amount the Company would receive upon termination of the agreements (net of settled contract assets), totaled $ 5 million and $ 62 million , respectively. As of June 30, 2013 , the Company estimates that during the next twelve months it will reclassify from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings approximately $ 36 million in net losses.

The impact of cash flow hedges on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements is depicted below (in millions):

Fair Value of Aircraft Fuel Derivative Instruments (all cash flow hedges)

Asset Derivatives as of

Liability Derivatives as of

June 30, 2013

December 31, 2012

June 30, 2013

December 31, 2012

Balance

Sheet

Location

Fair

Value

Balance

Sheet

Location

Fair

Value

Balance

Sheet

Location

Fair

Value

Balance

Sheet

Location

Fair Value

Fuel derivative contracts

Accrued liabilities

—

Effect of Aircraft Fuel Derivative Instruments on Statements of Operations (all cash flow hedges)



Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative ¹ as of June 30						Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income ¹	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income ¹ for the six months ended June 30,						Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative ²	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative ² for the six months ended June 30,
2013			2012				2013			2012				2013			2012
$	(70	)	$	(56	)	Aircraft Fuel	$	(12	)	$	25		Aircraft Fuel	$	(11	)	$	(5	)

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative ¹ for the quarter ended June 30,						Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income ¹	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income ¹ for the quarter ended June 30,						Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative ²	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative ² for the quarter ended June 30,
2013			2012				2013			2012				2013			2012
$	(56	)	$	(104	)	Aircraft Fuel	$	(13	)	$	(1	)	Aircraft Fuel	$	(18	)	$	(8	)


^1.	Effective portion of gain (loss)


^2.	Ineffective portion of gain (loss)

The Company is party to certain interest rate swap agreements that are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Ineffectiveness for these instruments is required to be measured at each reporting period. The ineffectiveness and fair value associated with all of the Company's interest rate cash flow hedges for all periods presented was not material.

While certain of the Company's fuel derivatives are subject to enforceable master netting agreements with its counterparties, the Company does not offset its fuel derivative assets and liabilities in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain of these agreements would also allow for the offsetting of fuel derivatives with interest rate derivatives. The impact of offsetting derivative instruments is depicted below (in millions):

As of June 30, 2013 :



							Gross asset (liability) not offset in Balance Sheet
	Gross asset (liability)		Gross asset (liability) offset in Balance Sheet		Net recognized asset (liability) in Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Received (Posted)		Net Amount
Fuel derivatives	$	21	$	16	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	5

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2012 :



							Gross asset (liability) not offset in Balance Sheet
	Gross asset (liability)		Gross asset (liability) offset in Balance Sheet		Net recognized asset (liability) in Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Received (Posted)		Net Amount
Fuel derivatives	$	65	$	—	$	65	$	—	$	—	$	65

As of June 30, 2013 , the Company had posted cash collateral of an immaterial amount.

The Company is also exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these financial instruments, and although no assurances can be given, the Company does not expect any of the counterparties to fail to meet its obligations. The credit exposure related to these financial instruments is represented by the fair value of contracts with a positive fair value at the reporting date, reduced by the effects of master netting agreements. To manage credit risks, the Company selects counterparties based on credit ratings, limits its exposure to a single counterparty under defined guidelines, and monitors the market position of the program and its relative market position with each counterparty. The Company also maintains industry-standard security agreements with a number of its counterparties which may require the Company or the counterparty to post collateral if the value of selected instruments exceed specified mark-to-market thresholds or upon certain changes in credit ratings.

11. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (in millions, except per share data):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Numerator:
Net earnings (loss)—numerator for basic earnings (loss) per share	$	220		$	(241	)	$	(122	)	$	(1,900	)
Interest on senior convertible notes	7			—			—			—
Net earnings (loss) adjusted for interest on senior convertible notes	$	227		$	(241	)	$	(122	)	$	(1,900	)
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share – weighted-average shares	335			335			335			335
Effect of dilutive securities:
Senior convertible notes	47			—			—			—
Employee options and shares	9			—			—			—
Assumed treasury shares purchased	(3		)	—			—			—
Dilutive potential common shares	388			335			335			335
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share—adjusted weighted-average shares	388			335			335			335
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.65		$	(0.72	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(5.67	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.59		$	(0.72	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(5.67	)
The following were excluded from the calculation:
Convertible notes, employee stock options and deferred stock because inclusion would be anti-dilutive	—			46			52			46
Employee stock options because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of shares	8			24			15			24

Table of Contents

12. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table sets forth the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component (in millions):



	Pension and retiree medical liability			Unrealized gain (loss) on investments			Derivative financial instruments			Income tax benefit (expense)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	(2,322	)	$	(1	)	$	15		$	(672	)	$	(2,980	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	—			—			(56		)	—			(56		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(66		)	—			12			—			(54		)
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(66	)	$	—		$	(44	)	$	—		$	(110	)
Balance at June 30, 2013	$	(2,388	)	$	(1	)	$	(29	)	$	(672	)	$	(3,090	)

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are as follows (in millions):



Details about accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components	Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)						Affected line item in the statement where net income (loss) is presented
	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013			Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Amortization of pension and retiree medical liability
Prior service cost	$	(54	)	$	(108	)	Wages, salaries and benefits
Actuarial loss	21			42			Wages, salaries and benefits

Derivative financial instruments
Cash flow hedges	13			12			Aircraft fuel

Total reclassifications for the period	$	(20	)	$	(54	)

13. Merger Agreement

Description of Agreement and Plan of Merger

On February 13, 2013, AMR, US Airways Group and AMR Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of AMR (Merger Sub), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, the Merger Agreement), providing for a business combination of AMR and US Airways Group. The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into US Airways Group (the Merger), with US Airways Group surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of AMR. It is anticipated that immediately following the merger closing, AMR will change its name to American Airlines Group Inc. (AAG). Following the Merger, AAG will own, directly or indirectly, all of the equity interests of American, US Airways Group and their direct and indirect subsidiaries. The Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, were subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, and are to be effected pursuant to the Plan, which is subject to confirmation and consummation in accordance with the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, which has been approved by the boards of directors of the respective parties, upon completion of the Merger, US Airways Group stockholders will receive one share of common stock of AAG (AAG Common Stock) for each share of US Airways Group common stock. The aggregate number of shares of AAG Common Stock issuable to holders of US Airways Group equity instruments (including stockholders and holders of convertible notes, options,

Table of Contents

stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units) will represent 28% of the diluted equity of AAG after giving effect to the Plan. The remaining 72% diluted equity ownership of AAG will be distributable, pursuant to the Plan, to the Debtors' stakeholders, labor unions and certain employees.

All of the equity interests in AAG will be issued initially solely pursuant to the Merger Agreement or the Plan. Pursuant to the Plan, holders of AMR equity interests are expected to receive a recovery on such interests in the form of a distribution of AAG common stock. On June 7, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court authorized American to begin soliciting votes on the Plan from creditors and stockholders. The hearing before the Court to consider confirmation of the Plan is scheduled for August 15, 2013. Implementation of the Plan and the making of any distributions thereunder are subject to confirmation thereof in accordance with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the occurrence of the effective date under the Plan and the consummation of the Merger.

The Merger is intended to qualify, for federal income tax purposes, as a reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

AMR and US Airways Group have each made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, covenants to conduct their businesses in the ordinary and usual course between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the consummation of the Merger, subject to certain restrictions as set forth in the Merger Agreement. In addition, the Merger Agreement contains “no shop” provisions that restrict each party's ability to initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or facilitate competing third-party proposals for any transaction involving a merger of such party or the acquisition of a significant portion of its stock or assets, although each party may consider competing, unsolicited proposals and enter into discussions or negotiations regarding such proposals, if its board of directors determines that any such acquisition proposal constitutes, or is reasonably likely to lead to, a superior proposal and that the failure to take such action is reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law.

US Airways Group has agreed to certain additional customary covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, subject to certain exceptions, (i) to cause a stockholder meeting to be held to consider adoption of the Merger Agreement and (ii) for its board of directors to recommend adoption of the Merger Agreement by US Airways Group stockholders. AMR has also agreed to certain additional customary covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, subject to certain exceptions, (i) to pursue confirmation of the Plan and (ii) for its board of directors to recommend adoption of the Merger Agreement by the Debtors' stakeholders.

Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including, among others: (i) approval by the stockholders of US Airways Group; (ii) expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and the receipt of certain other regulatory approvals; (iii) absence of any order or injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger; (iv) Bankruptcy Court confirmation of the Plan, which must contain certain specified provisions defined in the Merger Agreement; (v) subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of representations and warranties with respect to the business of AMR or US Airways Group, as applicable; (vi) each of AMR and US Airways Group having performed their respective obligations pursuant to the Merger Agreement; and (vii) receipt by each of the Company and US Airways Group of a customary tax opinion.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for AMR and US Airways Group, and further provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, (i) AMR may be required to pay US Airways Group a termination fee of $135 million in the event it terminates the agreement to enter into a superior proposal and $195 million if US Airways Group terminates the Merger Agreement in the event of a knowing and deliberate breach of the Merger Agreement by AMR and (ii) US Airways Group may be required to pay AMR a termination fee of $55 million in the event it terminates the agreement to enter into a superior proposal and $195 million if AMR terminates the Merger Agreement in the event of a knowing and deliberate breach of the Merger Agreement by US Airways Group.

On May 10, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Merger Support Order. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, upon entry of the Merger Support Order by the Bankruptcy Court, the Merger Agreement became effective and binding on, and enforceable against each of the parties thereto retroactive to February 13, 2013.

At the meeting of stockholders of US Airways Group, Inc. held on July 12, 2013, US Airways Group's stockholders approved the adoption of the Merger Agreement.

Support Agreement and Term Sheet

On February 13, 2013, AMR and the other Debtors entered into a Support and Settlement Agreement (the Support Agreement) with certain significant holders of certain prepetition claims against one or more of the Debtors (such holders of claims, the Consenting Creditors), aggregating approximately $1.2 billion of prepetition unsecured claims. Pursuant to the terms of the Support Agreement, each Consenting Creditor has agreed, among other things, and subject to certain conditions, to (a) vote in

Table of Contents

favor of a plan of reorganization, which must include certain terms specified in a Term Sheet attached to the Support Agreement (the Term Sheet), (b) generally support confirmation and consummation of such plan and (c) not to support or solicit any plan in opposition to such plan. The Plan contains the terms specified in the Term Sheet.

The Support Agreement may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events, including: (a) certain breaches by the Debtors or Consenting Creditors under the Support Agreement; (b) termination of the Merger Agreement or the announcement by AMR or US Airways Group of their intent to terminate the Merger Agreement (in which case the Support Agreement would terminate automatically); (c) the failure to meet certain milestones with respect to achieving confirmation and consummation of the Plan; (d) the filing, amendment or modification of certain documents, including the Plan, in a manner materially inconsistent with the Support Agreement and materially adverse to a Consenting Creditor (in which case the Support Agreement can be terminated by such Consenting Creditor solely with respect to itself); (e) the amendment or modification of the Merger Agreement in a manner that is materially adverse to a Consenting Creditor (in which case the Support Agreement can be terminated by such Consenting Creditor solely with respect to itself); and (f) if the volume weighted average price of US Airways Group common stock for the thirty trading days ending on the last trading day immediately prior to the date of termination is less than $10.40 . Termination of the Support Agreement would give the Consenting Creditors the right to withdraw their support of the Plan.

As described in the Term Sheet, the Plan implements the Merger, incorporates a compromise and settlement of certain intercreditor and intercompany claim issues, and is to contain the following provisions relating to the treatment of prepetition unsecured claims against the Debtors and equity interests in AMR:

•

Unless they elect to receive alternative treatment, holders of prepetition unsecured claims against AMR or American that also are guaranteed by either such company (Double-Dip Unsecured Claims) will receive shares of preferred stock of AAG (the AAG Preferred Stock) that will be mandatorily convertible into shares of AAG Common Stock on each of the 30th, 60th, 90th and 120th day after the effective date of the Plan. Upon the conversion of the remaining AAG Preferred Stock on the 120th day after the effective date of the Plan, all AAG Preferred Stock will have been converted to AAG Common Stock and no AAG Preferred Stock will remain outstanding. The conversion price of the AAG Preferred Stock will vary on each conversion date, based on the volume weighted average price of the shares of the AAG Common Stock on the five trading days immediately preceding each conversion date, at a 3.5% discount, subject to a cap and a floor price. The AAG Preferred Stock allocable to the Double-Dip Unsecured Claims will have a face amount equal to the allowed amount of their claims, including post-petition interest at the non-default rate;


•	Holders of prepetition unsecured claims (other than claims of the Debtors' unions) that are not Double-Dip Unsecured Claims (and holders of Double-Dip Unsecured Claims that elect to receive such treatment) will receive shares of AAG Preferred Stock, as well as shares of AAG Common Stock;


•	Holders of existing AMR equity interests (including stock, warrants, restricted stock units and options) will receive a distribution of shares of AAG Common Stock representing 3.5% of the total number of shares of AAG Common Stock (on an as-converted basis) in addition to the potential to receive shares of AAG Common Stock above such amount; and


•	The satisfaction of certain labor-related claims through the allocation to such claims of shares of AAG Common Stock representing 23.6% of the total number of such shares of AAG Common Stock ultimately distributed to holders of prepetition general unsecured claims against the Debtors.

In each case, the distributions made to each of the foregoing stakeholders will be adjusted to take into account any reserves made for disputed claims under the Plan. The Debtors filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking approval of the Support Agreement and the Court entered an order approving the Support Agreement on June 4, 2013.

14. Subsequent Events

In connection with preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements and in accordance U.S. GAAP, the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of June 30, 2013 and determined that no additional disclosure to that presented in this Form 10-Q was necessary.

Table of Contents

Item 2 . Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Second Quarter Developments

During the second quarter of 2013 , the Company achieved several key milestones on its path to emergence from Chapter 11, including filing the Plan and the Disclosure Statement with the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Court entered the order approving the Disclosure Statement on June 7, 2013. The Plan and Disclosure Statement contemplate that AMR will emerge from Chapter 11 and merge with US Airways Group (as further described in Notes 1 and 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

Other second quarter highlights include the following:


•	On April 15, 2013, the Company filed the Form S-4 Registration Statement with the SEC to register the shares of AAG Common Stock that will be issued to stockholders of US Airways Group as consideration in the Merger in exchange for their US Airways Group common stock. The SEC declared the Form S-4 Registration Statement, as amended, effective on June 10, 2013.


•	On June 7, 2013, the Court authorized American to begin soliciting votes on the Plan from creditors and stockholders. Solicitation packages were distributed by June 20, 2013. The Company and the other Debtors have until July 29, 2013 to solicit and obtain acceptances for the Plan. The hearing before the Court to consider confirmation of the Plan is scheduled for August 15, 2013.

•

In the second quarter of 2013, American completed several financing transactions. In May 2013, American closed its private offering of the Series 2013-1C EETCs in the aggregate face amount of $120 million . In June 2013, American obtained secured credit facilities, comprised of a $1.05 billion term loan and a $1 billion revolving credit facility, secured by certain route authorities, slots and foreign gate leaseholds utilized by American in providing its scheduled air carrier services between the United States and South America. In June 2013, American also remarketed $216 million of Tulsa Municipal Airport Revenue Refunding Bonds Trust Series 2001A, 2001B, and 2000B due June 1, 2035 (Series 2000B) and December 1, 2035 (Series 2001 A&B). See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.


•	In the second quarter of 2013 , American continued its fleet renewal and took delivery of 12 new aircraft (nine B737-800s and three B777-300ERs).


•	As part of the AMR and US Airways merger, an announcement was made in June, 2013, naming the members of the Board of Directors and senior leadership team responsible for managing the new combined company, American Airlines Group Inc., effective after the closing of the companies' expected merger.

The Company continues to move forward with a carefully designed, step-by-step transformation plan and currently expects to emerge from Chapter 11, and the Merger to close, in the third quarter of 2013.

Financial Highlights

The Company recorded a consolidated net income of $ 220 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to a net loss of $ 241 million in the same period last year. The Company’s consolidated net income reflects $ 124 million of charges to reorganization items. Consolidated passenger revenue increased by $ 13 million to $ 5.6 billion for the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period last year. Cargo and other revenues decreased by $ 16 million to $ 809 million for the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period last year. Mainline passenger unit revenues were flat in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period last year, reflecting a 0.2 percent increase in passenger yield year-over-year and a decrease in load factor of approximately 0.3 points compared to the second quarter of 2012 .

Operating expenses decreased $350 million during the second quarter primarily due to lower wages, salaries and benefits costs and lower fuel costs. The Company's operating expenses for the second quarter also include special items and merger related expenses of $13 million (see Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information) compared to $106 million of special items in the second quarter of 2012.

Charges to reorganization items, net, of $ 124 million for the second quarter of 2013 consist primarily of estimated claims associated with restructuring certain special facility revenue bonds and professional fees. See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Table of Contents

Contingencies

The Company has certain contingencies resulting from litigation and claims incident to the ordinary course of business. Management believes, after considering a number of factors, including (but not limited to) the information currently available, the views of legal counsel, the nature of contingencies to which the Company is subject and prior experience, that the ultimate disposition of the litigation (please see Part II, Item 1, "Legal Proceedings") and claims will not materially affect the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. When appropriate, the Company accrues for these contingencies based on its assessments of the likely outcomes of the related matters. The amounts of these contingencies could increase or decrease in the near term, based on revisions to those assessments. See also Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information on the claims resolution process.

As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, virtually all prepetition pending litigation against the Company is stayed.

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The matters described herein, to the extent that they relate to future events or expectations, may be significantly affected by the Chapter 11 Cases. Those proceedings will involve, or may result in, various restrictions on our activities, limitations on financing, the need to consult with the Creditors’ Committee and other key stakeholders and to obtain Bankruptcy Court approval for various matters, and uncertainty as to relationships with vendors, suppliers, customers, labor and others with whom we may conduct or seek to conduct business. The Debtors cannot predict the impact, if any, that its Chapter 11 Cases might have on these obligations. For further information regarding the Chapter 11 Cases, see Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cash, Short-Term Investments and Restricted Assets

At June 30, 2013 , the Company had $ 6.2 billion in unrestricted cash and short-term investments and $ 863 million in restricted cash and short-term investments, both at fair value, versus $ 3.9 billion in unrestricted cash and short-term investments and $ 850 million in restricted cash and short-term investments at December 31, 2012 .

The Company has restricted cash and short-term investments related primarily to collateral held to support projected workers' compensation obligations and funds held for certain tax obligations.

The Company’s unrestricted short-term investment portfolio consists of a variety of what the Company believes are highly liquid, lower risk instruments including money market funds, government agency investments, repurchase agreements, short-term obligations, corporate obligations, bank notes, certificates of deposit and time deposits. AMR’s objectives for its investment portfolio are (1) the safety of principal, (2) liquidity maintenance, (3) yield maximization, and (4) the full investment of all available funds. The Company’s risk management policy further emphasizes superior credit quality (primarily based on short-term ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations) in selecting and maintaining investments in its portfolio and enforces limits on the proportion of funds invested with one issuer, one industry, or one type of instrument. The Company regularly assesses the market risks of its portfolio, and believes that its established policies and business practices adequately limit those risks. As a result, the Company does not anticipate any material adverse impact from these risks.

Certain of the Company’s debt financing agreements contain loan to value ratio covenants and require the Company to periodically appraise the collateral. Pursuant to such agreements, if the loan to value ratio exceeds a specified threshold, the Company may be required to subject additional qualifying collateral (which in some cases may include cash collateral) or, in the alternative, to pay down such financing, in whole or in part, with premium (if any). Two such agreements also include covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to merge, consolidate, sell assets, incur additional indebtedness, issue preferred stock, make investments and pay dividends. In addition, under one such agreement, if American fails to maintain certain collateral ratios of 1.5 to 1.0, American must pay additional interest on the related notes (which bear interest at 7.5% per annum) at the rate of 2% per annum until the collateral coverage ratio equals at least 1.5 to 1.0. See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Significant Indebtedness and Future Financing

Our indebtedness and our ability to obtain sufficient financing are significant risks to the Company as discussed more fully in the Risk Factors included under Item 1A of the 2012 Form 10-K.

The Chapter 11 Cases triggered defaults on substantially all debt and lease obligations of the Debtors. However, under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, the commencement of a Chapter 11 case automatically stays most creditor actions against the Debtors’ estates. The outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases, which cannot be determined at this time, could further increase the Company’s borrowing or other costs and further restrict the availability of future financing.

The Company currently has financing commitments that, subject to certain conditions, cover all of its scheduled aircraft deliveries through 2016, except 18 Boeing 787 aircraft and 11 Boeing 777-300ER aircraft, which the Company may finance in the future.

In the remainder of 2013, including liabilities subject to compromise, the Company will be contractually required to make approximately $1.0 billion of principal payments on long-term debt and approximately $17 million in principal payments on capital leases, and the Company expects to spend approximately $1.3 billion on capital expenditures, including aircraft commitments.

At emergence from Chapter 11, the Company will be required to or may deem it desirable to settle in cash certain obligations that matured during the Chapter 11 Cases. The Company cannot predict the amount of cash that would be required to settle such obligations, but its present estimate is that such costs will be approximately $1.4 billion . In addition, the Company anticipates that transition costs to integrate the business of the Company and US Airways Group will be approximately $1.2 billion.

During the first six months of 2013, American closed its private offerings of three tranches of EETCs in the aggregate face amount of $664 million (Series 2013-1A/B EETC) and $120 million (Series 2013-1C EETC). In June 2013, American obtained $2.0

Table of Contents

billion in secured credit facilities, comprised of a $1.05 billion term loan and a $1 billion revolving credit facility, secured by route authorities, slots and foreign gate leaseholds utilized by American in providing its scheduled air carrier services between the United States and South America. In June 2013, American also remarketed $216 million of Tulsa Municipal Airport Revenue Refunding Bonds Trust Series 2001A, 2001B, and 2000B due June 1, 2035 (Series 2000B) and December 1, 2035 (Series 2001 A&B). See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the Company's aircraft acquisition commitments, payments, options and financing agreements.

Credit Card Processing and Other Reserves

American has agreements with a number of credit card companies and processors to accept credit cards for the sale of air travel and other services. Under certain of these agreements, the credit card processor may hold back a reserve from American’s credit card receivables following the occurrence of certain events, including the failure of American to maintain certain levels of liquidity (as specified in each agreement).

Under such agreements, the amount of the reserve that may be required generally is based on the processor’s exposure to the Company under the applicable agreement and, in the case a reserve is required because of AMR’s failure to maintain a certain level of liquidity, the amount of such liquidity. As of June 30, 2013 , the Company was not required to maintain any reserve under such agreements. If circumstances were to occur that would allow the credit card processor to require the Company to maintain a reserve, the Company’s liquidity would be negatively impacted.

Pension Funding Obligation

Cash Flow Activity

At June 30, 2013 , the Company had $ 6.2 billion in unrestricted cash and short-term investments, which is an increase of $ 2.3 billion from the balance as of December 31, 2012. Net cash provided by operating activities in the six month period ended June 30, 2013 was $ 1.8 billion , as compared to $ 1.7 billion over the same period in 2012. In addition, as described above, the Company obtained a $1.05 billion term loan, increasing the Company's liquidity position.

The Company made debt and capital lease payments of $ 551 million and invested $ 1.8 billion in capital expenditures in the first six months of 2013 . Capital expenditures primarily consisted of new aircraft and certain aircraft modifications.

Due to the current value of the Company’s derivative contracts, some agreements with counterparties require collateral to be deposited by the counterparty or the Company. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , the Company had posted cash collateral of an immaterial amount. As a result of movements in fuel prices, the cash collateral amounts held by AMR or the counterparties to such contracts, as the case may be, can vary significantly.

War-Risk Insurance

The U.S. government has agreed to provide commercial war-risk insurance for U.S. based airlines through September 30, 2013, covering losses to employees, passengers, third parties and aircraft. If the U.S. government were to cease providing such insurance in whole or in part, it is likely that the Company could obtain comparable coverage in the commercial market, but the Company would incur substantially higher premiums and more restrictive terms. There can be no assurance that comparable war-risk coverage will be available in the commercial market. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate war-risk coverage at commercially reasonable rates, the Company would be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

REVENUES

The Company’s revenues decreased approximately $ 3 million to $ 6.4 billion in the second quarter of 2013 from the same period last year. American’s passenger revenues increased by 1.1 percent , or $ 51 million , on 1.1 percent higher capacity to 38.7 billion available seat miles (ASM). American’s passenger load factor decreased 0.3 points while passenger yield increased by 0.2 percent to 14.9 cents . This resulted in a decrease in mainline passenger revenue per available seat mile (RASM) of 0.1 percent to 12.6 cents . American derived approximately 60 percent of its passenger revenues from domestic operations and approximately 40 percent from international operations (flights serving international destinations). Following is additional information regarding American’s domestic and international RASM and capacity:



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
	RASM (cents)	Y-O-Y Change		ASMs (billions)	Y-O-Y Change
DOT Domestic	12.7	(0.1	)%	22.4	(1.4	)%
International	12.5	0.1		16.3	4.8
DOT Latin America	13.2	(3.0	)	8.0	9.2
DOT Atlantic	12.6	6.8		5.9	(1.9	)
DOT Pacific	9.9	(7.0	)	2.5	8.2

In the second quarter of 2013 , the airlines providing American with regional feed (Regional Affiliates) included one wholly owned subsidiary, AMR Eagle, and three third party regional airlines, Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. (Chautauqua), SkyWest, and ExpressJet.

Regional Affiliates’ passenger revenues decreased $ 38 million , or 4.8 percent , to $ 752 million as a result of lower yield. Regional Affiliates’ traffic increased 0.1 percent to 2.7 billion revenue passenger miles (RPMs), on a capacity increase of 1.0 percent to 3.5 billion ASMs, resulting in a 0.7 point decrease in passenger load factor to 77.1 percent .

Cargo revenues decreased 4.6 percent , or $ 8 million , to $ 167 million primarily as a result of decreased freight and mail yields.

Other revenues decreased 1.2 percent , or $ 8 million , to $ 642 million due to a decrease in ancillary fees.

O PERATING E XPENSES

The Company’s total operating expenses decreased 5.5 percent , or $ 350 million , to $ 6.0 billion in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period last year. American’s mainline operating expenses per ASM decreased 7.5 percent to 13.5 cents . The decrease in operating expense was largely due to lower wages, salaries and benefits costs.



(in millions) Operating Expenses	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013		Change from 2012			Percentage Change
Aircraft fuel	$	2,139	$	(70	)	(3.2	)%
Wages, salaries and benefits	1,450		(328		)	(18.4	)	(a)
Other rentals and landing fees	343		10			3.0
Maintenance, materials and repairs	375		18			5.0		(b)
Depreciation and amortization	248		(13		)	(5.0	)
Commissions, booking fees and credit card expense	257		(6		)	(2.3	)
Aircraft rentals	179		49			37.7		(c)
Food service	149		19			14.6		(d)
Special charges and merger related	13		(93		)	(87.7	)	(e)
Other operating expenses	807		64			8.6		(f)
Total operating expenses	$	5,960	$	(350	)	(5.5	)%


(a)	Wages, salaries and benefits decreased primarily as a result of modifications to pension and other post-employment benefits and reductions in certain work groups during 2012. See Note 8 and Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information, respectively.


(b)	Maintenance, materials and repairs increased primarily due to timing of materials and repairs expenses.

Table of Contents


(c)	Aircraft rental expense increased primarily due to new aircraft deliveries in 2013.


(d)	Food service increased primarily as a result of increased passengers boarded and enhanced product offerings.


(e)	Special charges decreased primarily as a result of severance related charges incurred in 2012.


(f)	Other operating expenses increased primarily due to increases in outsourced services and volatility in foreign exchange rates.

O THER I NCOME (E XPENSE )

Other income (expense) consists of interest income and expense, interest capitalized and miscellaneous—net.

A decrease in short-term investment rates caused a decrease in interest income of $ 2.4 million , or 34.3 percent , to $ 5 million for the second quarter 2013 compared to the same period last year. Interest expense increased $ 5 million , or 3.0 percent , to $ 169 million primarily as a result of the post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations that the debtors agreed to allow pursuant to the Support Agreement.

R EORGANIZATION ITEMS , NET

Reorganization items refer to revenues, expenses (including professional fees), realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the Chapter 11 Cases. The following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 :



(in millions)
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	83		158
Professional fees	40		72
Other	1		—
Total reorganization items, net	$	124	$	230

(1)

Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court to reject or modify such financing and the Debtors believe that it is probable the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. Modifications of the financings related to certain aircraft remain subject to conditions, including reaching agreement on definitive documentation. See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Special Protection Applicable to Leases and Secured Financing of Aircraft and Aircraft Equipment,” for further information.

(2)

Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to entry of orders treating as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the treatment of claims with respect to facility agreements when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court and the Debtors believe that it is probable that the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Rejection of Executory Contracts,” for further information.

Claims related to reorganization items are reflected in liabilities subject to compromise on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2013 .

I NCOME T AX

The Company did not record a net tax provision (benefit) associated with its net earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2013 or June 30, 2012 due to the Company providing a valuation allowance, as discussed in Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

O PERATING S TATISTICS

The following table provides statistical information for American and Regional Affiliates for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 .



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
American Airlines, Inc. Mainline Jet Operations
Revenue passenger miles (millions)	32,851		32,586
Available seat miles (millions)	38,723		38,289
Cargo ton miles (millions)	470		456
Passenger load factor	84.8	%	85.1	%
Passenger revenue yield per passenger mile (cents)	14.88		14.84
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents)	12.62		12.63
Cargo revenue yield per ton mile (cents)	35.57		38.34
Operating expenses per available seat mile, excluding Regional Affiliates (cents) (*)	13.46		14.55
Fuel consumption (gallons, in millions)	623		604
Fuel price per gallon (dollars)	3.02		3.24
Operating aircraft at period-end	629		608
Regional Affiliates
Revenue passenger miles (millions)	2,686		2,683
Available seat miles (millions)	3,482		3,447
Passenger load factor	77.1	%	77.8	%

(*)Excludes $ 748 million and $ 756 million of expense incurred related to Regional Affiliates in 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

Operating aircraft at June 30, 2013 , included:



American Airlines Aircraft		AMR Eagle Aircraft
Boeing 737-800	213	Bombardier CRJ-700	47
Boeing 757-200	106	Embraer RJ-135	11
Boeing 767-200 ER	14	Embraer RJ-140	59
Boeing 767-300 ER	58	Embraer RJ-145	118
Boeing 777-200 ER	47	Total	235
Boeing 777-300 ER	8
McDonnell Douglas MD-80	183
Total	629

The average aircraft age for American’s and AMR Eagle’s aircraft is 14.7 years and 10.4 years, respectively.

Almost all of the Company’s owned aircraft are encumbered by liens granted in connection with financing transactions entered into by the Company.

Of the operating aircraft listed above, ten Boeing 757-200 aircraft, three McDonnell Douglas MD-80 aircraft, and two Boeing 767-200 Extended Range aircraft were in temporary storage as of June 30, 2013 .

Owned and leased aircraft not operated by the Company at June 30, 2013 , included:



American Airlines Aircraft		AMR Eagle Aircraft
Boeing 737-800	1	Saab 340B	41
Boeing 757-200	2	Total	41
McDonnell Douglas MD-80	39
Total	42

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the aircraft contractually obligated to American under capacity purchase agreements with third party regional airlines at June 30, 2013 :



	Fleet Type
Carrier	Bombardier CRJ-200	Embraer RJ-140	Total
SkyWest	12	—	12
ExpressJet	11	—	11
Chautauqua	—	15	15
Total	23	15	38

Of the aircraft listed above, one SkyWest CRJ-200 aircraft was on operational reserve as of June 30, 2013 .

See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's capacity purchase agreements with third party regional airlines.

All aircraft, excluding the SAAB 340B aircraft and aircraft operated by third party regional airlines, are owned or leased by American as of June 30, 2013 .

See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information on the Company's activities under section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information on the Company's acquisition commitments, payments and options.

Table of Contents

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

REVENUES

The Company’s revenues increased approximately $57 million , or 0.5 percent , to $12.5 billion in the first six months of 2013 from the same period last year driven by an increase in yield and an increase in international load factor. American’s passenger revenues increased by 1.1 percent , or $108 million , on capacity reduction of 0.1 percent to 76.1 billion available seat miles (ASM). American’s passenger load factor increased 0.7 points while passenger yield increased by 0.4 percent to 15.09 cents. This resulted in an increase in passenger revenue per available seat mile (RASM) of 1.3 percent to 12.48 cents. American derived approximately 60 percent of its passenger revenues from domestic operations and approximately 40 percent from international operations (flights serving international destinations). Following is additional information regarding American’s domestic and international RASM and capacity:



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
	RASM (cents)	Y-O-Y Change		ASMs (billions)	Y-O-Y Change
DOT Domestic	12.5	1.3	%	44.4	(1.8	)%
International	12.5	1.3		31.8	2.4
DOT Latin America	13.6	(1.5	)	16.8	6.9
DOT Atlantic	11.8	7.7		10.3	(4.2	)
DOT Pacific	9.6	(4.5	)	4.7	2.3

Regional Affiliates’ passenger revenues, which are based on industry standard proration agreements for flights connecting to American flights, decreased $29 million , or 2.0 percent , to $1.4 billion as a result of lower yield. Regional Affiliates’ traffic increased 0.5 percent to 5.1 billion revenue passenger miles (RPMs), on a capacity increase of 0.3 percent to 6.8 billion ASMs, resulting in a 0.1 point increase in passenger load factor to 74.7 percent . For the six months ended June 30, 2013, Regional Affiliates' revenues include the results of Executive Airlines, Inc. which ceased operations at the end of the first quarter of 2013.

Cargo revenues decreased 6.1 percent , or $21 million , to $322 million primarily as a result of decreased freight and mail yields.

Other revenues decreased 0.1 percent , or $1.0 million , to $1.3 billion due to a decrease in ancillary fees.

OPERATING EXPENSES

The Company’s total operating expenses decreased 3.5 percent , or $430 million , to $12 billion in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 . American’s mainline operating expenses per ASM decreased 4.1 percent to 13.8 cents . The decrease in operating expense was largely due to lower wages, salaries and benefits costs.



(in millions) Operating Expenses	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013		Change from 2012			Percentage Change
Aircraft fuel	$	4,339	$	(36	)	(0.8	)%
Wages, salaries and benefits	2,934		(626		)	(17.6	)	(a)
Other rentals and landing fees	690		29			4.4
Maintenance, materials and repairs	758		58			8.3		(b)
Depreciation and amortization	494		(27		)	(5.2	)
Commissions, booking fees and credit card expense	533		4			0.8
Aircraft rentals	343		71			26.1		(c)
Food service	288		33			12.9		(d)
Special charges and merger related	41		(76		)	(65.0	)	(e)
Other operating expenses	1,587		140			9.7		(f)
Total operating expenses	$	12,007	$	(430	)	(3.5	)%

Table of Contents


(a)	Wages, salaries and benefits decreased primarily as a result of modifications to pension and other post-employment benefits and reductions in certain work groups during 2012. See Note 8 and Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information, respectively.


(b)	Maintenance, materials and repairs increased primarily due to timing of materials and repairs expenses.


(c)	Aircraft rental expense increased primarily due to new aircraft deliveries in 2013.


(d)	Food service increased primarily as a result of increased passengers boarded and enhanced product offerings.


(e)	Special charges decreased primarily as a result of severance related charges incurred in 2012.


(f)	Other operating expenses increased primarily due to increases in outsourced services and volatility in foreign exchange rates.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

Other income (expense) consists of interest income and expense, interest capitalized and miscellaneous—net.

A decrease in short-term investment rates caused a decrease in interest income of $4.0 million , or 31 percent , to $9.1 million for the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period last year. Interest expense increased $89 million , or 26 percent , to $431 million as a result of the post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations that the debtors agreed to allow pursuant to the Support Agreement.

REORGANIZATION ITEMS, NET



(in millions)
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ^(1)(2)(3)	219		1,513
Professional fees	79		117
Other	(14	)	—
Total reorganization items, net	284		1,630

(1)

Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court to reject or modify such financing and the Debtors believe that it is probable the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. Modifications of the financings related to certain aircraft remain subject to conditions, including reaching agreement on definitive documentation. See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Special Protection Applicable to Leases and Secured Financing of Aircraft and Aircraft Equipment,” for further information.

(2)

Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to entry of orders treating as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the treatment of claims with respect to facility agreements when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court and the Debtors believe that it is probable that the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Rejection of Executory Contracts,” for further information.

(3)

Table of Contents

INCOME TAX

The Company recorded a net tax (benefit) of approximately $22 million associated with its net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 due to the Company realizing a valuation allowance release for refundable credits allowed as a result of passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company did not record a net tax provision (benefit) associated with its net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2012 due to the Company providing a valuation allowance, as discussed in Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

OPERATING STATISTICS

The following table provides statistical information for American and Regional Affiliates for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
American Airlines, Inc. Mainline Jet Operations
Revenue passenger miles (millions)	62,990		62,546
Available seat miles (millions)	76,115		76,207
Cargo ton miles (millions)	880		901
Passenger load factor	82.8	%	82.1	%
Passenger revenue yield per passenger mile (cents)	15.09		15.02
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents)	12.48		12.33
Cargo revenue yield per ton mile (cents)	36.57		38.07
Operating expenses per available seat mile, excluding Regional Affiliates (cents) (*)	13.79		14.38
Fuel consumption (gallons, in millions)	1,215		1,196
Fuel price per gallon (dollars)	3.14		3.24
Operating aircraft at period-end
Regional Affiliates
Revenue passenger miles (millions)	5,079		5,054
Available seat miles (millions)	6,801		6,781
Passenger load factor	74.7	%	74.5	%

(*)Excludes $1.5 billion and $1.5 billion of expense incurred related to Regional Affiliates in 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company believes its estimates and assumptions are reasonable; however, actual results and the timing of the recognition of such amounts could differ from those estimates. The Company has identified the following critical accounting policies and estimates used by management in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements: claims resolution process, long-lived assets, international slots and route authorities, passenger revenue, frequent flyer program, stock compensation, pensions and retiree medical and other benefits, income taxes and derivatives accounting. These policies and estimates are described in the 2012 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Item 3 . Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of the Company’s 2012 Form 10-K. The change in market risk for aircraft fuel is discussed below for informational purposes.

The risk inherent in the Company’s market risk sensitive instruments and positions is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in the price of fuel, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates as discussed below. The sensitivity analyses presented do not consider the effects that such adverse changes may have on overall economic activity, nor do they consider additional actions management may take to mitigate the Company’s exposure to such changes. Therefore, actual results may differ. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. See Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Aircraft Fuel The Company’s earnings are substantially affected by changes in the price and availability of aircraft fuel. In order to provide a measure of control over price and supply, the Company trades and ships fuel and maintains fuel storage facilities to support its flight operations. The Company also manages the price risk of fuel costs through the use of hedging contracts, which consist primarily of collars (consisting of a purchased call option and a sold put option) and call spreads (consisting of a purchased call option and a sold call option). Heating oil, jet fuel and crude oil are the primary underlying commodities in the hedge portfolio. Market risk is estimated as a hypothetical 10 percent increase in the June 30, 2013 and 2012 cost per gallon of fuel. Based on projected fuel usage for the next twelve months, such an increase would result in an increase to Aircraft fuel expense of approximately $ 671 million , inclusive of the impact of effective fuel hedge instruments outstanding at June 30, 2013 , and assumes the Company’s fuel hedging program remains effective. Such an increase would have resulted in an increase to projected Aircraft fuel expense of approximately $ 743 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, inclusive of the impact of fuel hedge instruments outstanding at December 31, 2011.

As of June 30, 2013 , the Company had cash flow hedges covering approximately 34 percent of its estimated remaining 2013 fuel requirements. Comparatively, as of June 30, 2012 , the Company had hedged approximately 40 percent of its estimated remaining 2012 fuel requirements. The consumption hedged for the remainder of 2013 is capped at an average price of approximately $ 2.94 per gallon of jet fuel. Seven percent of estimated remaining 2013 fuel requirements is hedged using call spreads with protection capped at an average price of approximately $ 3.19 per gallon of jet fuel. Twenty-seven percent of estimated remaining 2013 fuel requirements is hedged using collars with an average floor price of approximately $ 2.56 per gallon of jet fuel. The capped and floor prices exclude taxes and transportation costs. A deterioration of the Company’s financial position could negatively affect the Company’s ability to hedge fuel in the future.

Ineffectiveness is inherent in hedging jet fuel with derivative positions based in crude oil or other crude oil related commodities. The Company assesses, both at the inception of each hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in its hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. In doing so, the Company uses a regression model to determine the correlation of the change in prices of the commodities used to hedge jet fuel (e.g., NYMEX Heating oil) to the change in the price of jet fuel. The Company also monitors the actual dollar offset of the hedges’ market values as compared to hypothetical jet fuel hedges. The fuel hedge contracts are generally deemed to be “highly effective” if the R-squared is greater than 80 percent and the dollar offset correlation is within 80 percent to 125 percent. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively if it determines that a derivative is no longer expected to be highly effective as a hedge or if it decides to discontinue the hedging relationship.

Item 4 . Controls and Procedures

The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). This term refers to the controls and procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2013 . During the quarter ending on June 30, 2013 , there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 . Legal Proceedings

As previously discussed, on November 29, 2011 the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code. Each of the Debtors continues to operate its business and manage its property as a debtor in possession pursuant to sections 1107 and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. As a result of the current Chapter 11 Cases, attempts to prosecute, collect, secure or enforce remedies with respect to prepetition claims against the Debtors are subject to the automatic stay provisions of section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, including, except in such cases where the Bankruptcy Court has entered an order modifying or lifting the automatic stay, the litigation described below. Notwithstanding the general application of the automatic stay described above, governmental authorities, both domestic and foreign, may determine to continue actions brought under their regulatory powers. Therefore, the automatic stay may have no effect on certain matters described below.

On February 22, 2006, the Company received a letter from the Swiss Competition Commission informing the Company that it is investigating whether the Company and certain other cargo carriers entered into agreements relating to fuel surcharges, security surcharges, war-risk surcharges, and customs clearance surcharges. On March 11, 2008, the Company received a request for information from the Swiss Competition Commission concerning, among other things, the scope and organization of the Company's activities in Switzerland. On November 8, 2012, the Swiss Competition Commission issued a preliminary order finding that the Company participated in an illegal conspiracy to set cargo fuel, security, and war risk surcharges, and recommending that the Company should be fined 2,225,310 Swiss Francs. A hearing on those alleged charges has been set for September 9 and 16. The Company disputes the allegation in the Swiss order and intends to vigorously defend itself under Swiss law. On January 23, 2007, the Brazilian competition authorities, as part of an ongoing investigation, conducted an unannounced search of the Company's cargo facilities in Sao Paulo, Brazil. On April 24, 2008, the Brazilian competition authorities charged the Company with violating Brazilian competition laws. On December 31, 2009, the Brazilian competition authorities made a non-binding recommendation to the Brazilian competition tribunal that it find the Company in violation of competition laws and levy a fine in an unspecified amount. The Brazilian authorities are investigating whether the Company and certain other foreign and domestic airlines violated Brazilian competition laws by illegally conspiring to set fuel surcharges on cargo shipments. The Company is vigorously contesting the allegations and the preliminary findings of the Brazilian competition authorities. The Company intends to cooperate fully with all pending investigations.

In addition, the Company has received inquiries from a number of other jurisdictions, including Australia and South Korea, regarding the Company's practices relating to setting fuel charges. The Company has timely responded to all such inquiries.

On April 12, 2011, American filed an antitrust lawsuit against Travelport and Orbitz in Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas. On October 20, 2011, American sought leave to file new antitrust claims against the defendants based on facts learned through discovery. The lawsuit, as amended, alleged, among other things, that (i) the defendants engaged in anticompetitive practices to preserve their monopoly power over American's ability to distribute its products through their subscribers and (ii) such actions have prevented American from employing new competing technologies and allowed the defendants to continue to charge American supracompetitive fees.

On December 22, 2011, Travelport brought counterclaims against American alleging that American's direct connect efforts violate the antitrust laws. On August 16, 2012, the federal district court dismissed Travelport's counterclaims. On February 5, 2013, Travelport filed a motion for reconsideration of the federal district court's August 16, 2012 order dismissing its counterclaims and to amend its counterclaims to assert a new claim against American. The proposed new counterclaim alleged that American participated in a conspiracy with rival airlines and Farelogix, Inc., a technology provider to American, to reduce and eliminate competition from Travelport and other GDSs and to coordinate their negotiations with Travelport and other GDSs.

American settled its disputes with Travelport and Orbitz on March 12, 2013 and March 29, 2013, respectively, subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Under the terms of the settlement between American and Travelport, (i) the parties amended their current distribution and content agreements and extended such agreements for multiple years, (ii) Travelport agreed to provide certain monetary payments to American, and (iii) the parties released one another from any and all claims asserted, or that could have been asserted, in connection with the lawsuit and in a separate case pending between American and Travelport in Illinois state court. Under the terms of the settlement between American and Orbitz, the parties released one another from any and all claims asserted, or that could have been asserted, in connection with the lawsuit. The Bankruptcy Court approved the settlement on April 25, 2013.

The Company is engaged in other legal proceedings from time to time. Legal proceedings can be complex and take many months, or even years, to reach resolution, with the final outcome depending on a number of variables, some of which are not within the control of the Company. Therefore, although the Company will vigorously defend itself in each of the actions described above and such other legal proceedings, the ultimate resolution and potential financial impact on the Company is uncertain.

Table of Contents

Item 6 . Exhibits

Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K. Where the amount of securities authorized to be issued under any of AMR’s long-term debt agreements does not exceed 10 percent of AMR’s assets, pursuant to paragraph (b) (4) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K, in lieu of filing such as an exhibit, AMR hereby agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request a copy of any agreement with respect to such long-term debt.

The following exhibits are included herein:



10.1	Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Purchase Agreement No. 03735 by and between American Airlines, Inc. and The Boeing Company, dated as of April 15, 2013. Portions of the Exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a confidential treatment request under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
10.2	Amendment No. 2 to A320 Family Aircraft Purchase Agreement by and between American Airlines, Inc. and Airbus S.A.S., dated as of May 30, 2013. Portions of the Exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a confidential treatment request under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
10.3	Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2013, among American Airlines, Inc., as the borrower, AMR, as parent and guarantor, the subsidiaries of AMR from time to time party thereto, as guarantors, the lenders party thereto from time to time, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent, collateral agent, issuing lender and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as left lead arranger for the Revolving Facility (as defined in the Credit and Guaranty Agreement) and syndication agent, Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as documentation agents, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint bookrunners.
12	Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
32	Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code).
101	The following materials from AMR Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.*
*	Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

Table of Contents

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

AMR files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy these reports, statements or other information filed by AMR at the SEC's Public Reference Room at Room 1580, 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. The SEC filings of AMR are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. You can also find the SEC filings of AMR on its website, www.aa.com.

The SEC allows AMR to incorporate information by reference into this Form 10-Q. This means that AMR can disclose important information to you by referring you to another document filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this Form 10-Q, except for any information that is superseded by information that is included directly in this Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference subsequent to the date of this Form 10-Q. AMR does not incorporate the contents of its website into this Form 10-Q.

AMR has made and expects to make public disclosures of certain information regarding AMR and its subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, disclosures regarding the Merger, to investors and the general public by means of certain social media sites, including, but not limited to, Facebook and Twitter and by means of a joint Merger website maintained by AMR and US Airways Group. Investors are encouraged to (i) follow American (@AmericanAir) on Twitter, (ii) “like” American (www.facebook.com/AmericanAirlines) on its Facebook page and (iii) visit www.aaarriving.com for updated information regarding AMR, US Airways Group, and the Merger. AMR does not incorporate the contents of its social media posts or the joint Merger website into this Form 10-Q.

Table of Contents

Signature

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		AMR CORPORATION

Date:	July 18, 2013	BY:	[/s/ Isabella D. Goren]
			Isabella D. Goren
			Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I: Financial Information Item 1. Financial Statements Item 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 4. Controls and Procedures Part Ii: Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings Item 6. Exhibits

AAL 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2013