AHH 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

or

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-35908

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(757) 366-4000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

As of October 30, 2015, the Registrant had 26,520,311 shares of common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

(In thousands, except par value and share data)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) is a full service real estate company with extensive experience developing, building, owning and managing high-quality, institutional-grade office, retail and multifamily properties in attractive markets throughout the Mid-Atlantic United States. The Company is the sole general partner of Armada Hoffler, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). The operations of the Company are carried on primarily through the Operating Partnership and the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. Both the Company and the Operating Partnership were formed on October 12, 2012 and commenced operations upon completion of the underwritten initial public offering of shares of the Company’s common stock and certain related formation transactions on May 13, 2013.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company owned 100% of the interests in each of the following properties in its operating property portfolio:

5

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2015, the following properties were under development or construction:

The Company owns a 60% controlling financial interest in Lightfoot Marketplace. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, the Company’s ownership interest in Lightfoot Marketplace may increase to 70%. The Company owns an 80% controlling financial interest in Johns Hopkins Village. The noncontrolling interest holder of Johns Hopkins Village has the right to exchange its 20% ownership interest for Class A units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“Class A Units”) upon and for a period of one year after the project’s completion.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial position and results of operations of the Company, the Operating Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary for the fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods presented.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the requirements for interim financial information. Accordingly, these interim financial statements have not been audited and exclude certain disclosures required for annual financial statements. Also, the operating results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed. Such estimates are based on management’s historical experience and best judgment after considering past, current and expected events and economic conditions. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates.

Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared on the basis of the accounting principles described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, among others.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new standard that provides a single, comprehensive model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. While the new standard does not supersede the guidance on accounting for leases, it could change the way the Company recognizes revenue from construction and development contracts with third party customers. The new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new revenue recognition standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

On February 18, 2015, the FASB issued new consolidation guidance that changes: (i) the identification of variable interests, (ii) the variable interest entity (“VIE”) characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (iii) primary beneficiary determination. The amended guidance also eliminates the presumption that a general partner controls a limited partnership. The amended guidance will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2016. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Current accounting guidance requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as an asset. On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount, rather than as an asset. However, with respect to line of credit arrangements, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff have stated that they would not object to the presentation of issuance costs as an asset, regardless of whether there were any outstanding borrowings under such arrangements. The new guidance will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2016 and will be applied on a retrospective basis. Management does not expect the adoption of the new guidance to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Net operating income (segment revenues minus segment expenses) is the measure used by the Company’s chief operating decision-maker to assess segment performance. Net operating income is not a measure of operating income or cash flows from operating activities as measured by GAAP and is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. As a result, net operating income should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Not all companies calculate net operating income in the same manner. The Company considers net operating income to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it assists both investors and management in understanding the core operations of the Company’s real estate and construction businesses.

Net operating income of the Company’s reportable segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was as follows (in thousands):

General contracting and real estate services revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 exclude revenue related to intercompany construction contracts of $11.4 million and $27.9 million, respectively. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 exclude expenses related to intercompany construction contracts of $11.3 million and $27.7 million, respectively. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 include noncash stock compensation expense of less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

General contracting and real estate services revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 exclude revenue from intercompany construction contracts of $24.2 million and $68.8 million, respectively. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 exclude expenses for intercompany construction

7

Table of Contents

contracts of $24.1 million and $68.2 million, respectively. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 include noncash stock compensation expense of less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

The following table reconciles net operating income to net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

General and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 include noncash stock compensation expense of $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively. General and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 include noncash stock compensation expense of $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

On March 31, 2015, the Company purchased land held for development in the Town Center of Virginia Beach, Virginia for $1.2 million.

Operating Property Acquisitions

In connection with operating property acquisitions, the Company identifies and recognizes all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The purchase price allocations to tangible assets, such as land, site improvements and buildings and improvements are presented within income producing property in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Acquired lease intangibles are presented within other assets and liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and amortized over their respective lease terms. The Company expenses all costs incurred related to operating property acquisitions. The Company values land based on a market approach, looking to recent sales of similar properties, adjusting for differences due to location, the state of entitlement as well as the shape and size of the parcel. Improvements to land are valued using a replacement cost approach. The approach applies industry standard replacement costs adjusted for geographic specific considerations and reduced by estimated depreciation. The value of buildings acquired is estimated using the replacement cost approach, assuming the buildings were vacant at acquisition. The replacement cost approach considers the composition of the structures acquired, adjusted for an estimate of depreciation. The estimate of depreciation is made considering industry standard information and depreciation curves for the identified asset classes. The value of acquired lease intangibles considers the estimated cost of leasing the properties as if the acquired buildings were vacant, as well as the value of the current leases relative to market-rate leases. The in-place lease value is determined using an estimated total lease-up time and lost rental revenues during such time. The value of current leases relative to market-rate leases is based on market rents obtained for market comparables. Given the significance of unobservable inputs used in the valuation of acquired real estate assets, the Company classifies them as Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.

On April 8, 2015, the Company completed the acquisitions of Stone House Square in Hagerstown, Maryland and Perry Hall Marketplace in Perry Hall, Maryland. In exchange for both properties, the Company paid $35.4 million of cash and issued 415,500 shares of common stock. The acquisition date fair value of the total consideration transferred in exchange for Stone House Square and Perry Hall Marketplace was $39.8 million.

On July 1, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of Socastee Commons, a 57,000 square foot retail center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The total consideration for Socastee Commons was $8.7 million, which was comprised of $3.7 million of cash and the assumption of debt with an outstanding principal balance of $5.0 million.

8

Table of Contents

On July 10, 2015, the Company acquired Columbus Village, a 65,000 square foot retail center in Virginia Beach, Virginia. In exchange for Columbus Village, the Company assumed debt with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $8.8 million, issued 1,000,000 Class B units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“Class B Units”) and agreed to issue 275,000 Class C units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“Class C Units”) on January 10, 2017. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, the Class B Units and Class C Units will not earn or accrue distributions until July 10, 2017 and January 10, 2018, respectively, at which time each may be redeemed in exchange for cash equal to the market price of shares of the Company’s common stock or, at the Company’s option and sole discretion, shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis. The estimated fair value of the Class B Units and Class C Units includes a discount for their lack of marketability and distributions until July 10, 2017 and January 10, 2017, respectively. The acquisition date fair value of the total consideration transferred in exchange for Columbus Village was $19.2 million.

On September 1, 2015, the Company acquired Providence Plaza in Charlotte, North Carolina for $26.2 million of cash. Providence Plaza is a mixed-use property comprised of three buildings totaling 103,000 square feet, a two-level parking garage and approximately one acre of land zoned for multifamily development.

The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 (in thousands):

The following table summarizes the consolidated results of operations of the Company on a pro forma basis, as if each of these properties had been acquired on January 1, 2014 (in thousands):

The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if each of these acquisitions had taken place on January 1, 2014. The pro forma financial information includes adjustments to rental revenues for above and below-market leases and adjustments to depreciation and amortization expense for acquired property and in-place lease assets.

Rental revenues and net income from the acquired properties for the period from the respective acquisition dates to September 30, 2015 included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income was $2.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

Real Estate Dispositions

On January 5, 2015, the Company completed the sale of the Sentara Williamsburg office property for $15.4 million. Net proceeds to the Company after transaction costs were $15.2 million. The Company recognized a gain on the disposition of the Sentara Williamsburg office property of $6.2 million.

On February 13, 2015, the Company agreed to the future sale of the Oyster Point office property for $6.5 million. The Company intends to complete the sale on January 15, 2017.

On May 20, 2015, the Company completed the sale of Whetstone Apartments for $35.6 million. Net proceeds to the Company after transaction costs were $35.5 million. The Company recognized a gain on the disposition of Whetstone Apartments of $7.2 million.

9

Table of Contents

Subsequent to September 30, 2015

Brooks Crossing

On October 5, 2015, the Company purchased 3.24 acres of land in Newport News, Virginia for $0.1 million for the development of Brooks Crossing, a new urban, mixed-use and low-rise development project, in partnership with the City of Newport News.

Point Street Apartments

On October 15, 2015, the Company agreed to invest up to $23.0 million in the Point Street Apartments project in the Harbor Point area of Baltimore, Maryland. Point Street Apartments is an estimated $93.0 million development project with plans for a 17-story building comprising 289 residential units and 18,000 square feet of street-level retail space. Beatty Development Group (“BDG”) is the developer of the project and has engaged the Company to serve as construction general contractor. Point Street Apartments is scheduled to open in 2017; however, management can provide no assurances that Point Street Apartments will open on the anticipated timeline.

BDG is responsible for securing a senior construction loan of up to $70.0 million to fund the development and construction of Point Street Apartments. The Company has agreed to guarantee up to $25.0 million of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase up to an 88% controlling interest in Point Street Apartments upon completion of the project as follows: (i) an option to purchase a 79% indirect interest in Point Street Apartments for $27.3 million, exercisable within one year from the project’s completion (the “First Option”) and (ii) provided that the Company has exercised the First Option, an option to purchase an additional 9% indirect interest in Point Street Apartments for $3.1 million, exercisable within 27 months from the project’s completion (the “Second Option”).

The Company’s investment in the Point Street Apartments project is in the form of a loan under which BDG may borrow up to $23.0 million (the “BDG loan”). Interest on the BDG loan accrues at 8.0% per annum and matures on the earlier of: (i) November 1, 2018, which may be extended by BDG under two one-year extension options, (ii) the maturity date or earlier termination of the senior construction loan or (iii) the date the Company exercises the Second Option as described further below.

In the event the Company exercises the First Option, BDG is required to simultaneously pay down the senior construction loan by $7.4 million and the BDG loan by $19.9 million, at which time the interest rate on the BDG loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan plus 200 basis points. In the event the Company exercises the Second Option, BDG is required to simultaneously repay any remaining amounts outstanding under the BDG loan, with any excess proceeds received from the exercise of the Second Option applied against the senior construction loan. In the event the Company does not exercise either the First Option or the Second Option, the interest rate on the BDG loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan for the remaining term of the BDG loan. In the event BDG is unable to secure a senior construction loan on or before June 30, 2016, the interest rate on the BDG loan will be reduced to one-month LIBOR plus 200 basis points.

As of the date of this report, the Company had funded $6.1 million under the BDG loan.

Oceaneering International facility sale

On October 30, 2015, the Company completed the sale of the Oceaneering International facility for $30.0 million. Net assets of $5.7 million associated with the Oceaneering International facility were included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015.

Richmond Tower sale

On November 2, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Richmond Tower office building for $78.0 million. The Company expects to complete the disposition in 2015, subject to the satisfaction of certain customary closing conditions including satisfactory completion of the buyer’s due diligence. There can be no assurances that these conditions will be satisfied or that the Company will complete the disposition on the terms described herein or at all. Net assets of $51.4 million associated with the Richmond Tower office building were included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015.

10

Table of Contents

Credit Facility

On January 23, 2015, the Operating Partnership borrowed $5.0 million under its prior credit facility. This credit facility was scheduled to mature on May 13, 2016; however, the Operating Partnership repaid all amounts due under this credit facility with proceeds from a new credit facility and terminated the prior credit facility on February 20, 2015, as discussed below.

New Credit Facility

On February 20, 2015, the Operating Partnership, as borrower, and the Company, as parent guarantor, entered into a new $200.0 million senior unsecured credit facility that includes a $150.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility and a $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility. The new credit facility replaced the prior $155.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature on May 13, 2016. On February 20, 2015, the Operating Partnership borrowed $54.0 million under the revolving credit facility and $50.0 million under the term loan facility to repay in full all outstanding amounts due under the prior credit facility and to repay approximately $39.0 million of other indebtedness secured by the following properties in the Company’s portfolio: (i) Broad Creek Shopping Center, (ii) Commerce Street Retail, (iii) Dick’s at Town Center, (iv) Hanbury Village, (v) Studio 56 Retail and (vi) Tyre Neck Harris Teeter. The Company recognized a $0.2 million loss on extinguishment of debt representing the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the $39.0 million of other indebtedness repaid on February 20, 2015.

Depending on the Operating Partnership’s total leverage, the revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.40% to 2.00% and the term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%. As of September 30, 2015, the interest rates on the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility were 1.75% and 1.70%, respectively. The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2019, with a one-year extension option, subject to certain conditions, and the term loan facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2020. The Operating Partnership may, at any time, voluntarily prepay any loan under the new credit facility in whole or in part without premium or penalty.

As of September 30, 2015, the outstanding balances on the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility were $106.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively.

Other Financing Activity

On May 20, 2015, the Company repaid the $17.8 million construction loan secured by Whetstone Apartments and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.1 million representing unamortized debt issuance costs.

On May 27, 2015, the Company repaid the existing $24.4 million mortgage secured by Smith’s Landing and refinanced the property with a new $21.6 million loan that bears interest at 4.05% and matures on June 1, 2035. As a result of the refinancing, the Company recognized a $0.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt representing the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the repaid mortgage.

On July 1, 2015, the Company assumed debt with an outstanding principal balance of $5.0 million in connection with the acquisition of Socastee Commons. The mortgage bears interest at 4.57% and matures on January 6, 2023.

On July 10, 2015, the Company assumed two loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $8.8 million in connection with the acquisition of Columbus Village. Both loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.00% and mature on April 5, 2018.

On July 30, 2015, the Company entered into a $50.0 million loan agreement to fund the development and construction of Johns Hopkins Village. The construction loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.90% and matures on July 30, 2018.

On September 1, 2015, the Company repaid the $6.1 million mortgage secured by the Oyster Point office building.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company borrowed $17.7 million under its construction loans to fund new development and construction.

Subsequent to September 30, 2015

On October 6, 2015, the Operating Partnership secured the Oyster Point office building with a $6.4 million note that bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.40% to 2.00% and matures on February 28, 2017.

On October 30, 2015, the Company repaid the $18.7 million construction loan secured by the Oceaneering International facility.

11

Table of Contents

The Company may enter into interest rate derivative contracts to manage exposure to interest rate risks. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Derivative financial instruments are recognized at fair value and presented within other assets and liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivatives that are neither designated nor qualify as hedging instruments are recognized within other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. For derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.

On February 20, 2015, the Operating Partnership entered into a $50.0 million floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $50.0 million interest rate swap has a fixed rate of 2.00%, an effective date of March 1, 2016 and a maturity date of February 20, 2020. The Operating Partnership entered into this interest rate swap agreement in connection with the new $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility that bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%, depending on the Operating Partnership’s total leverage. The Company designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of variable interest payments based on one-month LIBOR.

On July 13, 2015, the Operating Partnership entered into a $6.5 million floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $6.5 million interest rate swap has a fixed rate of 3.05%, an effective date of July 13, 2015 and a maturity date of April 5, 2018. The Company designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of variable interest payments based on one-month LIBOR.

The Company’s derivatives were comprised of the following as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

The changes in the fair value of the Company’s derivatives during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were comprised of the following (in thousands):

Subsequent to September 30, 2015

On October 26, 2015, the Operating Partnership entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $75.0 million at a strike rate of 1.25% for a premium of $0.1 million. The interest rate cap agreement expires on October 15, 2017.

Stockholders’ Equity

On April 8, 2015, the Company issued 415,500 shares of common stock in a private placement as partial consideration for the acquisition of Perry Hall Marketplace.

12

Table of Contents

On May 5, 2015, the Company commenced an at-the-market continuous equity program through which the Company may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 747,163 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $10.29 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after offering costs and commissions were $7.4 million.

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company’s authorized capital was 500 million shares of common stock and 100 million shares of preferred stock. The Company had 26.3 million and 25.0 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. No shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Noncontrolling Interests

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company held a 62.5% and 62.9% interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively. As the sole general partner and the majority interest holder, the Company consolidates the financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. Noncontrolling interests in the Company represent units of limited partnership interest not held by the Company.

As of September 30, 2015, there were 14,768,507 Class A Units not held by the Company.

As partial consideration for Columbus Village, the Operating Partnership issued 1,000,000 Class B Units on July 10, 2015 and agreed to issue 275,000 Class C Units on January 10, 2017. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, the Class B Units and Class C Units will not earn or accrue distributions until July 10, 2017 and January 10, 2018, respectively, at which time each automatically convert to Class A Units.

Common Stock Dividends and Class A Unit Distributions

On January 8, 2015, the Company paid cash dividends of $4.0 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $2.4 million to holders of Class A Units.

On April 9, 2015, the Company paid cash dividends of $4.3 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $2.5 million to holders of Class A Units.

On July 9, 2015, the Company paid cash dividends of $4.4 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $2.5 million to holders of Class A Units.

On August 6, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.17 per share to stockholders of record on October 1, 2015.

Subsequent to September 30, 2015

On October 8, 2015, the Company paid cash dividends of $4.5 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $2.5 million to holders of Class A Units.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company granted an aggregate of 104,779 shares of restricted stock to employees and nonemployee directors with a weighted average grant date fair value of $10.85 per share. Employee restricted stock awards generally vest over a period of two years: one-third immediately on the grant date and the remaining two-thirds in equal amounts on the first two anniversaries following the grant date, subject to continued service to the Company. Nonemployee director restricted stock awards vest either immediately upon grant or over a period of one year, subject to continued service to the Company.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized $0.2 million and $1.0 million of stock-based compensation, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recognized $0.3 million and $1.2 million of stock-based compensation, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, there were 102,322 nonvested restricted shares outstanding; the total unrecognized compensation related to nonvested restricted shares was $0.5 million, which the Company expects to recognize over the next 18 months.

13

Table of Contents

Fair value measurements are based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. The hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value is as follows:

Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2—observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

Level 3—unobservable inputs

Except as disclosed below, the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments approximate their fair value. Financial assets and liabilities whose fair values are measured on a recurring basis using Level 2 inputs consist of interest rate swaps and caps. The Company measures the fair values of these assets and liabilities based on prices provided by independent market participants that are based on observable inputs using market-based valuation techniques.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. For disclosure purposes, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The fair value of the Company’s long term debt is sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. Discounted cash flow analysis based on Level 2 inputs is generally used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s long term debt.

Considerable judgment is used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. The estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized upon disposition of the financial instruments.

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, all of which are based on Level 2 inputs, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows (in thousands):

The Company provides general contracting and real estate services to certain related party entities that are not included in these condensed consolidated financial statements. Revenue from construction contracts with related party entities of the Company was $1.5 million and $5.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Gross profit from such contracts was less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Revenue from construction contracts with related party entities of the Company was $1.1 million and $5.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Gross profit from such contracts was less than $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Real estate services fees from affiliated entities of the Company were not significant for either the three or nine months ended September 30, 2015 or 2014. In addition, affiliated entities also reimburse the Company for monthly maintenance and facilities management services provided to the properties. Cost reimbursements earned by the Company from affiliated entities were not significant for either the three or nine months ended September 30, 2015 or 2014.

On March 31, 2015, the Company acquired the option to purchase land in Virginia Beach, Virginia for future development from certain of its executives, officers and directors. As consideration for the land option, the Company reimbursed such executives, officers and directors $0.2 million for the real estate taxes and insurance costs they incurred with respect to this land. On March 31, 2015, the Company exercised the option on the land, which is presented as real estate held for development in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

14

Table of Contents

Legal Proceedings

The Company is from time to time involved in various disputes, lawsuits, warranty claims, environmental and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any potential loss relating to these matters.

The Company currently is a party to various legal proceedings, none of which management expects will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Management accrues a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and a range of loss can be reasonably estimated, management accrues the best estimate within the range; however, if no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other, the minimum amount within the range is accrued. Legal fees related to litigation are expensed as incurred. Management does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations; however, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties.

Under the Company’s leases, tenants are typically obligated to indemnify the Company from and against all liabilities, costs and expenses imposed upon or asserted against it as owner of the properties due to certain matters relating to the operation of the properties by the tenant.

Commitments

The Company has a bonding line of credit for its general contracting construction business and is contingently liable under performance and payment bonds, bonds for cancellation of mechanics liens and defect bonds. Such bonds collectively totaled $204.7 million and $192.2 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

The Operating Partnership has entered into standby letters of credit using the available capacity under the credit facility. The letters of credit relate to the guarantee of future performance on certain of the Company’s construction contracts. Letters of credit generally are available for draw down in the event the Company does not perform. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Operating Partnership had total outstanding letters of credit of $8.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively.

15

Table of Contents

Review Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. as of September 30, 2015, and the related condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and the condensed consolidated statement of equity for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and we expressed an unqualified audit opinion on those consolidated financial statements in our report dated March 16, 2015. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia

November 4, 2015

16

Table of Contents

References to “we,” “our,” “us,” and “our company” refer to Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with our consolidated subsidiaries, including Armada Hoffler, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), of which we are the sole general partner.

Forward-Looking Statements

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this report, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, are based on beliefs and assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “result” and similar expressions, which do not relate solely to historical matters, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We caution you that while forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs when we make them, they are not guarantees of future performance and are impacted by actual events when they occur after we make such statements. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:

17

Table of Contents

While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, of new information, data or methods, future events or other changes after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, except as required by applicable law. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and urge investors to carefully review the disclosures we make concerning risks and uncertainties in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as risks, uncertainties and other factors discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and identified in other documents that we file from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Business Description

We are a full-service real estate company with extensive experience developing, building, owning and managing high-quality, institutional-grade office, retail and multifamily properties in attractive markets throughout the Mid-Atlantic United States. As of September 30, 2015, we owned 100% of the interests in each of the following properties in our operating property portfolio:

18

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2015, the following properties were either under development or construction:

We own a 60% controlling financial interest in Lightfoot Marketplace. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, our ownership interest in Lightfoot Marketplace may increase to 70%. We own an 80% controlling financial interest in Johns Hopkins Village. The noncontrolling interest holder of Johns Hopkins Village has the right to exchange its 20% ownership interest for common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership upon and for a period of one year after the project’s completion.

Point Street Apartments Project

On October 15, 2015, we agreed to invest up to $23.0 million in the Point Street Apartments project in the Harbor Point area of Baltimore, Maryland. Point Street Apartments is an estimated $93.0 million development project with plans for a 17-story building comprising 289 residential units and 18,000 square feet of street-level retail space. Beatty Development Group (“BDG”) is the developer of the project and has engaged us to serve as construction general contractor. Point Street Apartments is scheduled to open in 2017; however, we can provide no assurances that Point Street Apartments will open on the anticipated timeline.

BDG is responsible for securing a senior construction loan of up to $70.0 million to fund the development and construction of Point Street Apartments. We have agreed to guarantee up to $25.0 million of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase up to an 88% controlling interest in Point Street Apartments upon completion of the project as follows: (i) an option to purchase a 79% indirect interest in Point Street Apartments for $27.3 million, exercisable within one year from the project’s completion (the “First Option”) and (ii) provided that we have exercised the First Option, an option to purchase an additional 9% indirect interest in Point Street Apartments for $3.1 million, exercisable within 27 months from the project’s completion (the “Second Option”).

Our investment in the Point Street Apartments project is in the form of a loan under which BDG may borrow up to $23.0 million (the “BDG loan”). Interest on the BDG loan accrues at 8.0% per annum and matures on the earlier of: (i) November 1, 2018, which may be extended by BDG under two one-year extension options, (ii) the maturity date or earlier termination of the senior construction loan or (iii) the date we exercise the Second Option as described further below.

In the event we exercise the First Option, BDG is required to simultaneously pay down the senior construction loan by $7.4 million and the BDG loan by $19.9 million, at which time the interest rate on the BDG loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan plus 200 basis points. In the event we exercise the Second Option, BDG is required to simultaneously repay any remaining amounts outstanding under the BDG loan, with any excess proceeds received from the exercise of the Second Option applied against the senior construction loan. In the event we do not exercise either the First Option or the Second Option, the interest rate on the BDG loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan for the remaining term of the BDG loan. In the event BDG is unable to secure a senior construction loan on or before June 30, 2016, the interest rate on the BDG loan will be reduced to one-month LIBOR plus 200 basis points.

As of the date of this report, we had funded $6.1 million under the BDG loan.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

On October 30, 2015, we completed the sale of the Oceaneering International facility for $30.0 million.

On November 2, 2015, we entered into an agreement to sell the Richmond Tower office building for $78.0 million. We expect to complete the disposition in 2015, subject to the satisfaction of certain customary closing conditions including satisfactory completion of the buyer’s due diligence. There can be no assurances that these conditions will be satisfied or that we will complete the disposition on the terms described herein or at all.

Third Quarter 2015 Highlights

The following highlights our results of operations and significant transactions for the three months ended September 30, 2015:

19

Table of Contents

Segment Results of Operations

As of September 30, 2015, we operated our business in four segments: (i) office real estate, (ii) retail real estate, (iii) multifamily residential real estate and (iv) general contracting and real estate services, which are conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”). Net operating income (segment revenues minus segment expenses) or “NOI” is the measure used by management to assess segment performance and allocate our resources among our segments. NOI is not a measure of operating income or cash flows from operating activities as measured by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. As a result, NOI should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Not all companies calculate NOI in the same manner. We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it assists both investors and management in understanding the core operations of our real estate and construction businesses. See Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of NOI to net income.

We define same store properties as those properties that we owned and operated and that were stabilized for the entirety of both periods presented. Same store properties exclude those that were in lease-up during either of the periods presented. We generally consider a property to be in lease-up until the earlier of: (i) the quarter after the property reaches 80% occupancy or (ii) the thirteenth quarter after the property receives its certificate of occupancy.

20

Table of Contents

Office Segment Data

Office segment NOI for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased $0.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2014. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, NOI from new real estate development increased $1.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, which more than offset $0.4 million and $1.2 million of lost NOI during the same periods as a result of property dispositions.

During the second half of 2014, we opened the new 4525 Main Street office tower in the Town Center of Virginia Beach, and during the first quarter of 2015, we delivered three new build-to-suit office buildings in Hampton Roads, Virginia. We completed the sales of the Virginia Natural Gas and Sentara Williamsburg office buildings in the fourth quarter of 2014 and the first quarter of 2015, respectively.

Office Same Store Results

Office same store results exclude new real estate development – 4525 Main Street, the two administrative buildings for the Commonwealth of Virginia in Chesapeake and Virginia Beach and the Oceaneering International facility – as well as the Virginia Natural Gas and Sentara Williamsburg office buildings, which we sold in the fourth quarter of 2014 and the first quarter of 2015, respectively.

Office same store rental revenues, property expenses and NOI for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

Office same store NOI for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was relatively unchanged compared to the corresponding period in 2014. Office same store NOI for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased 1% compared to the corresponding period in 2014 because of better leasing at the office properties in the Town Center of Virginia Beach – One Columbus, Two Columbus and Armada Hoffler Tower.

21

Table of Contents

Retail Segment Data

Retail segment NOI for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased $1.9 million and $4.2 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2014. Acquisitions and new real estate development contributed $1.8 million and $3.6 million of NOI during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Same store NOI growth accounted for the balance of the increases.

During the second half of 2014, we acquired Dimmock Square in Colonial Heights, Virginia and delivered Greentree Shopping Center in Chesapeake, Virginia. At the end of the first quarter of 2015, we delivered Sandbridge Commons in Virginia Beach, Virginia. During the second quarter of 2015, we acquired Stone House Square in Hagerstown, Maryland and Perry Hall Marketplace in Perry Hall, Maryland. During the third quarter of 2015, we acquired Socastee Commons in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, Columbus Village in Virginia Beach, Virginia and Providence Plaza in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Retail Same Store Results

Retail same store results exclude new real estate development – Greentree Shopping Center and Sandbridge Commons – as well as new property acquisitions – Dimmock Square, Stone House Square, Perry Hall Marketplace, Socastee Commons, Columbus Village and Providence Plaza.

Retail same store rental revenues, property expenses and NOI for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows: