AUTONATION, INC.
10-Qs and 10-Ks
PROXIES
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012
OR
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission File Number: 1-13107
AutoNation, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
|
73-1105145
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
200 SW 1st Ave
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
|
|
33301
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(954) 769-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes
¨
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the new registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
þ
As of
June 30, 2012
, the aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates was approximately $1.1 billion based on the closing price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date (for the purpose of this calculation only, the registrant assumed that each of its directors, executive officers, and greater than 10% stockholders was an affiliate of the registrant as of
June 30, 2012
).
As of
February 11, 2013
, the registrant had
120,986,987
shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to its
2013
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31,
2012
are incorporated herein by reference in Part III.
AUTONATION, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2012
INDEX
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Item 1.
|
||
|
Item 1A.
|
||
|
Item 1B.
|
||
|
Item 2.
|
||
|
Item 3.
|
||
|
Item 4.
|
||
|
Item 5.
|
||
|
Item 6.
|
||
|
Item 7.
|
||
|
Item 7A.
|
||
|
Item 8.
|
||
|
Item 9.
|
||
|
Item 9A.
|
||
|
Item 9B.
|
||
|
Item 10.
|
||
|
Item 11.
|
||
|
Item 12.
|
||
|
Item 13.
|
||
|
Item 14.
|
||
|
Item 15.
|
||
PART I
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
General
AutoNation, Inc., through its subsidiaries, is the largest automotive retailer in the United States. As of
December 31, 2012
, we owned and operated
265
new vehicle franchises from
221
stores located in the United States, predominantly in major metropolitan markets in the Sunbelt region. Our stores, which we believe are some of the most recognizable and well-known in our key markets, sell
32
different new vehicle brands. The core brands of new vehicles that we sell, representing approximately
95%
of the new vehicles that we sold in
2012
, are manufactured by
Toyota, Ford, Honda, Nissan, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Chrysler, and Volkswagen
.
We offer a diversified range of automotive products and services, including new vehicles, used vehicles, “parts and service,” which includes automotive repair and maintenance services as well as wholesale parts and collision businesses, and automotive “finance and insurance” products, which includes the arranging of financing for vehicle purchases through third-party finance sources. The following charts present the contribution to total revenue and gross profit by each of new vehicle sales, used vehicle sales, parts and service, and finance and insurance in
2012
.
|
|
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1991. For convenience, the terms “AutoNation,” “Company,” and “we” are used to refer collectively to AutoNation, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise required by the context. Our store operations are conducted by our subsidiaries.
Operating Segments
As of
December 31, 2012
, we had
three
operating segments: Domestic, Import, and Premium Luxury. These segments are comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell the following new vehicle brands:
|
Domestic
|
Import
|
Premium Luxury
|
|||||
|
Buick
|
Ford
|
Acura
|
Nissan
|
Audi
|
Mercedes-Benz
|
||
|
Cadillac
|
GMC
|
Fiat
|
Scion
|
Bentley
|
Mini
|
||
|
Chevrolet
|
Jeep
|
Honda
|
Subaru
|
BMW
|
Porsche
|
||
|
Chrysler
|
Lincoln
|
Hyundai
|
Toyota
|
Land Rover
|
smart
|
||
|
Dodge
|
Ram
|
Infiniti
|
Volkswagen
|
Lexus
|
|||
|
Mazda
|
Volvo
|
||||||
|
Mitsubishi
|
|||||||
1
The franchises in each segment also sell used vehicles, parts and automotive repair and maintenance services, and automotive finance and insurance products. For the year ended
December 31, 2012
, Domestic revenue represented
33%
of total revenue, Import revenue represented
37%
of total revenue, and Premium Luxury revenue represented
29%
of total revenue. For additional financial information regarding our
three
operating segments, please refer to
Note 20
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Except to the extent that differences among operating segments are material to an understanding of our business taken as a whole, the description of our business in this report is presented on a consolidated basis.
Business Strategy
We seek to create long-term value for our stockholders by being the best-run, most profitable automotive retailer in the United States. We believe that the significant scale of our operations and the quality of our managerial talent allow us to achieve efficiencies in our key markets. To achieve and sustain operational excellence, we are pursuing the following strategies:
|
•
|
Create an industry-leading automotive retail consumer experience, both in our stores and online
. We seek to deliver a consistently superior customer experience by offering a large selection of inventory, customer-friendly, transparent sales and service processes, and competitive pricing. We believe that this will benefit us by encouraging our customers to bring their vehicles to our stores for all of their vehicle service, maintenance, and collision repair needs and also by driving repeat and referral vehicle sales business. We emphasize the importance of customer satisfaction to our key store personnel by basing a portion of their compensation on the quality of customer service they provide. We also leverage the Internet to market our stores, new and used vehicle inventory, and parts and service business. Our websites are designed to facilitate consumer research, as we believe that most consumers are researching vehicle and service information online.
|
|
•
|
Leverage our significant scale and cost structure to improve our operating efficiency
. We manage our new and used vehicle inventories to optimize our stores’ supply and mix of vehicle inventory in line with seasonal sales trends. We are also focused on maintaining appropriate inventory levels in order to minimize carrying costs. In order to improve financial controls and lower servicing costs, we shifted key store-level accounting and administrative activities to our Shared Services Center located in Irving, Texas. Further, we seek to increase employee productivity through our compensation and employee training programs, as well as disciplined management of staffing levels. Finally, we leverage our scale to reduce costs related to purchasing certain equipment, supplies, and services through national vendor relationships.
|
|
•
|
Build a powerful AutoNation retail brand that represents a consistently superior customer experience
. We plan to transition our Domestic and Import stores to a unified AutoNation retail brand throughout the first half of 2013. We believe that a unified AutoNation retail brand for our Domestic and Import stores will enhance our strong customer satisfaction and expand our market share. We also believe that we will drive more traffic to our websites through the AutoNation retail brand, which will allow us to market to more customers directly, rather than through third-party websites. Our Premium Luxury stores will continue to operate under their existing retail brands.
|
Our business benefits from a well-diversified portfolio of automotive retail franchises. In
2012
, approximately
39%
of our new vehicle revenue was generated by Import franchises, approximately
29%
by Premium Luxury franchises, and approximately
32%
was generated by Domestic franchises. We continue to look for acquisition and new store opportunities that meet our goal of offering all of our core vehicle brands within our existing markets as well as our return on investment threshold.
We believe that our business also benefits from diverse revenue streams generated by our new and used vehicle sales, parts and service business, and finance and insurance sales. Our higher-margin parts and service business has historically been less sensitive to macroeconomic conditions as compared to new and used vehicle sales.
Our capital allocation strategy is focused on maximizing stockholder returns. The first priority of our capital allocation strategy is to maintain a strong balance sheet. Second, we invest capital in our business to maintain and upgrade our existing facilities and to build new facilities, as well as for other strategic and technology initiatives. Third, we deploy capital opportunistically to repurchase our common stock and/or debt or to complete dealership acquisitions. Over the past three years, we repurchased over 60 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1.7 billion. We
2
also purchased 14 franchises during this timeframe, including our December 2012 acquisitions of Boardwalk Audi, Boardwalk Porsche, and three Volkswagen franchises in the Dallas, Texas market and Spring Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram in the Houston, Texas market. Our capital allocation decisions are based on factors such as the expected rate of return on our investment, the market price of our common stock versus our view of its intrinsic value, the market price of our debt, the potential impact on our capital structure, our ability to complete dealership acquisitions that meet our market and vehicle brand criteria and return on investment threshold, and limitations set forth in our debt agreements. For additional information regarding our capital allocation, please refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Allocation” in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10‑K.
Operations
Each of our stores acquires new vehicles for retail sale either directly from the applicable automotive manufacturer or distributor or through dealer trades with other stores of the same franchise. We generally acquire used vehicles from customer trade-ins, auctions, lease terminations, and other sources, and we generally recondition used vehicles acquired for retail sale in our parts and service departments. Used vehicles that we do not sell at our stores generally are sold at wholesale prices through auctions. See also “Inventory Management” in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
Our stores provide a wide range of vehicle maintenance, repair, and collision repair services, including warranty work that can be performed only at franchised dealerships and customer-pay service work. Our parts and service departments also provide reconditioning repair work for used vehicles acquired by our used vehicle departments and minor preparatory work for new vehicles acquired by our new vehicle departments. In addition to our retail business, we also have a wholesale parts operation, which sells automotive parts to both collision repair shops and independent vehicle repair providers.
We offer a wide variety of automotive finance and insurance products to our customers. We arrange for our customers to finance vehicles through installment loans or leases with third-party lenders, including the vehicle manufacturers’ and distributors’ captive finance subsidiaries, in exchange for a commission payable to us. We do not directly finance our customers’ vehicle leases or purchases, and our exposure to loss in connection with these financing arrangements generally is limited to the commissions that we receive.
We also offer our customers various vehicle protection products, including extended service contracts, maintenance programs, guaranteed auto protection (known as “GAP,” this protection covers the shortfall between a customer’s loan balance and insurance payoff in the event of a casualty), “tire and wheel” protection, and theft protection products. These products are underwritten and administered by independent third parties, including the vehicle manufacturers’ and distributors’ captive finance subsidiaries. We primarily sell the products on a straight commission basis; however, we also participate in future underwriting profit for certain products pursuant to retrospective commission arrangements. See also “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Chargeback Reserve” in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
3
As of
December 31, 2012
, we operated stores in the following states:
|
State
|
Number of
Stores
|
Number of
Franchises
|
% of Total
Revenue
(1)
|
||||
|
Florida
|
58
|
|
67
|
|
27
|
||
|
Texas
|
40
|
|
49
|
|
21
|
||
|
California
|
36
|
|
42
|
|
19
|
||
|
Colorado
|
17
|
|
24
|
|
7
|
||
|
Arizona
|
13
|
|
15
|
|
5
|
||
|
Nevada
|
10
|
|
11
|
|
4
|
||
|
Georgia
|
10
|
|
11
|
|
4
|
||
|
Washington
|
12
|
|
19
|
|
3
|
||
|
Illinois
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
3
|
||
|
Tennessee
|
7
|
|
8
|
|
2
|
||
|
Ohio
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
1
|
||
|
Minnesota
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
||
|
Virginia
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
||
|
Maryland
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
1
|
||
|
Alabama
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
||
|
Total
|
221
|
|
265
|
|
100
|
||
|
(1)
|
Revenue by state includes non-store activities, such as collision centers, a customer lead generation business, and an auction operation.
|
The following table sets forth information regarding new vehicle revenues and retail new vehicle unit sales for the year ended, and the number of franchises owned as of,
December 31, 2012
:
|
New Vehicle
Revenues
(in millions)
|
Retail
New Vehicle
Unit Sales
|
% of Total
Retail New
Vehicle
Units Sold
|
Franchises Owned
|
|||||||||
|
Domestic:
|
||||||||||||
|
Ford, Lincoln
|
$
|
1,551.6
|
|
46,858
|
|
17.5
|
41
|
|
||||
|
Chevrolet, Buick, Cadillac, GMC
|
938.4
|
|
28,876
|
|
10.8
|
44
|
|
|||||
|
Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge
|
329.6
|
|
10,213
|
|
3.8
|
26
|
|
|||||
|
Domestic Total
|
2,819.6
|
|
85,947
|
|
32.1
|
111
|
|
|||||
|
Import:
|
||||||||||||
|
Honda
|
761.2
|
|
30,699
|
|
11.5
|
20
|
|
|||||
|
Toyota
|
1,451.1
|
|
54,955
|
|
20.5
|
19
|
|
|||||
|
Nissan
|
786.1
|
|
29,994
|
|
11.2
|
23
|
|
|||||
|
Other imports
|
524.0
|
|
18,290
|
|
6.8
|
37
|
|
|||||
|
Import Total
|
3,522.4
|
|
133,938
|
|
50.0
|
99
|
|
|||||
|
Premium Luxury:
|
||||||||||||
|
Mercedes-Benz
|
1,210.1
|
|
21,680
|
|
8.1
|
24
|
|
|||||
|
BMW
|
698.8
|
|
12,762
|
|
4.8
|
11
|
|
|||||
|
Lexus
|
268.6
|
|
5,947
|
|
2.2
|
3
|
|
|||||
|
Other premium luxury
|
387.4
|
|
7,536
|
|
2.8
|
17
|
|
|||||
|
Premium Luxury Total
|
2,564.9
|
|
47,925
|
|
17.9
|
55
|
|
|||||
|
$
|
8,906.9
|
|
267,810
|
|
100.0
|
265
|
|
|||||
4
Agreements with Vehicle Manufacturers
Framework Agreements
We have entered into framework agreements with most major vehicle manufacturers and distributors. These agreements, which are in addition to the franchise agreements described below, contain provisions relating to our management, operation, advertising and marketing, and acquisition and ownership structure of automotive stores franchised by such manufacturers. These agreements contain certain requirements pertaining to our operating performance (with respect to matters such as sales volume, sales effectiveness, and customer satisfaction), which, if we do not satisfy, adversely impact our ability to make further acquisitions of such manufacturers’ stores or could result in us being compelled to take certain actions, such as divesting a significantly underperforming store, subject to applicable state franchise laws. Additionally, these agreements set limits (nationally, regionally, and in local markets) on the number of stores that we may acquire of the particular manufacturer and contain certain restrictions on our ability to name and brand our stores. Some of these framework agreements give the manufacturer or distributor the right to acquire at fair market value, or the right to compel us to sell, the automotive stores franchised by that manufacturer or distributor under specified circumstances in the event of a change in control of our company (generally including certain material changes in the composition of our Board of Directors during a specified time period, the acquisition of 20% or more of the voting stock of our Company by another vehicle manufacturer or distributor, or the acquisition of 50% or more of our voting stock by a person, entity, or group not affiliated with a vehicle manufacturer or distributor) or other extraordinary corporate transactions such as a merger or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, we have granted certain manufacturers the right to acquire, at fair market value, our automotive dealerships franchised by such manufacturers in specified circumstances in the event of our default under certain of our debt agreements.
In January 2009, our Board of Directors authorized and approved letter agreements with certain automotive manufacturers in order to, among other things, eliminate any potential adverse consequences under our framework agreements with those manufacturers in the event that ESL Investments, Inc. and certain of its investment affiliates (together, “ESL”) acquire 50% or more of our common stock. The letter agreements with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“Honda”) and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“Toyota”) also contain governance-related and other provisions as described below. ESL is also a party to both the Honda and Toyota Agreements. Based on filings made with the SEC through February 13, 2013, ESL beneficially owns approximately
44%
of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
Under the terms of the Honda Agreement, Honda has agreed not to assert its right to purchase our Honda and Acura franchises and/or similar remedies under the manufacturer framework agreement between Honda and the Company in the event that ESL acquires 50% or more of our common stock. ESL has agreed to vote all shares in excess of 50% in the same proportion as all non-ESL-owned shares are voted. In addition, we have agreed to ensure that a majority of our Board is independent of both the Company and ESL under existing New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards for so long as ESL owns more than 50% of our common stock. The Honda Agreement provides that Honda’s consent does not apply to a “going private” transaction under Rule 13e-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Under the terms of the Toyota Agreement, Toyota has agreed not to assert its right to purchase our Toyota and Lexus franchises and/or similar remedies under the manufacturer framework agreement between Toyota and the Company in the event that ESL acquires 50% or more of our common stock. ESL has agreed to vote all shares in excess of 50% in the same proportion as all non-ESL-owned shares are voted. Furthermore, we have agreed that a majority of our Board will be independent from both the Company and from ESL under existing NYSE listing standards. We have also agreed not to merge, consolidate, or combine with any entity owned or controlled by ESL unless Toyota consents thereto. In addition, the Toyota Agreement provides that in the event that we appoint a Chief Operating Officer who, in the good faith judgment of our Board, does not have sufficient breadth and depth of experience, a relevant, successful automotive track record, and extensive successful automotive experience, ESL shall be required to divest its shares in excess of 50% within nine (9) months or its voting interest will be limited to 25%, and if ESL does not divest such shares within eighteen (18) months, it will lose all voting rights until it divests such shares. The Toyota Agreement will terminate in the event that ESL’s ownership of our common stock falls to 40% or lower. In addition, the Toyota Agreement will terminate on December 31, 2013 with respect to future stock acquisitions by ESL, provided that ESL may seek successive annual one-year extensions. The description of the Toyota Agreement set forth above reflects all amendments thereto, including the most recent extension dated as of December 12, 2012, which we filed with a Current Report on Form 8-K on December 14, 2012.
5
We have also entered into separate letter agreements with certain other manufacturers that eliminate any potential adverse consequences under our framework agreements with those manufacturers in the event that ESL acquires 50% or more of our common stock. ESL is not a party to any of those agreements.
Franchise Agreements
We operate each of our new vehicle stores under a franchise agreement with a vehicle manufacturer or distributor. The franchise agreements grant the franchised automotive store a non-exclusive right to sell the manufacturer’s or distributor’s brand of vehicles and offer related parts and service within a specified market area. These franchise agreements grant our stores the right to use the relevant manufacturer’s or distributor’s trademarks in connection with their operations, and they also impose numerous operational requirements and restrictions relating to inventory levels, working capital levels, the sales process, marketing and branding, showroom and service facilities, signage, personnel, changes in management, and monthly financial reporting, among other things. The contractual terms of our stores’ franchise agreements provide for various durations, ranging from one year to no expiration date, and in certain cases manufacturers have undertaken to renew such franchises upon expiration so long as the store is in compliance with the terms of the agreement. We generally expect our franchise agreements to survive for the foreseeable future and, when the agreements do not have indefinite terms, anticipate routine renewals of the agreements without substantial cost or modification. Our stores’ franchise agreements provide for termination of the agreement by the manufacturer or non-renewal for a variety of causes (including performance deficiencies in such areas as sales volume, sales effectiveness, and customer satisfaction). However, in general, the states in which we operate have automotive dealership franchise laws that provide that, notwithstanding the terms of any franchise agreement, it is unlawful for a manufacturer to terminate or not renew a franchise unless “good cause” exists. It generally is difficult, outside of bankruptcy, for a manufacturer to terminate, or not renew, a franchise under these laws, which were designed to protect dealers. In addition, in our experience and historically in the automotive retail industry, dealership franchise agreements are rarely involuntarily terminated or not renewed by the manufacturer outside of bankruptcy. From time to time, certain manufacturers assert sales and customer satisfaction performance deficiencies under the terms of our framework and franchise agreements. We generally work with these manufacturers to address the asserted performance issues. For additional information, please refer to the risk factor captioned
“We are subject to restrictions imposed by, and significant influence from, vehicle manufacturers that may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects, including our ability to acquire additional stores”
in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.
Regulations
We operate in a highly regulated industry. A number of state and federal laws and regulations affect our business. In every state in which we operate, we must obtain various licenses in order to operate our businesses, including dealer, sales and finance, and insurance licenses issued by state regulatory authorities. Numerous laws and regulations govern our conduct of business, including those relating to our sales, operations, financing, insurance, advertising, and employment practices. These laws and regulations include state franchise laws and regulations, consumer protection laws, privacy laws, escheatment laws, anti-money laundering laws, and other extensive laws and regulations applicable to new and used motor vehicle dealers, as well as a variety of other laws and regulations. These laws also include federal and state wage-hour, anti-discrimination, and other employment practices laws. Furthermore, we expect that new laws and regulations, particularly at the federal level, may be enacted that could also affect our business. See the risk factor “
Our operations are subject to extensive governmental laws and regulations. If we are found to be in violation of or subject to liabilities under any of these laws or regulations, or if new laws or regulations are enacted that adversely affect our operations, our business, operating results, and prospects could suffer
” in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.
Automotive and Other Laws and Regulations
Our operations are subject to the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards promulgated by the United States Department of Transportation, and the rules and regulations of various state motor vehicle regulatory agencies. The imported automobiles we purchase are subject to United States customs duties and, in the ordinary course of our business we may, from time to time, be subject to claims for duties, penalties, liquidated damages, or other charges.
Our financing activities with customers are subject to federal truth-in-lending, consumer leasing, and equal credit opportunity laws and regulations as well as state and local motor vehicle finance laws, leasing laws, installment finance laws, usury laws, and other installment sales and leasing laws and regulations, some of which regulate finance and other
6
fees and charges that may be imposed or received in connection with motor vehicle retail installment sales and leasing. Claims arising out of actual or alleged violations of law may be asserted against us or our stores by individuals, a class of individuals, or governmental entities and may expose us to significant damages or other penalties, including revocation or suspension of our licenses to conduct store operations and fines.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was signed into law on July 21, 2010, established a new consumer financial protection agency with broad regulatory powers. Although automotive dealers are generally excluded, the Dodd-Frank Act could lead to additional, indirect regulation of automotive dealers through its regulation of automotive finance companies and other financial institutions.
Environmental, Health, and Safety Laws and Regulations
Our operations involve the use, handling, storage, and contracting for recycling and/or disposal of materials such as motor oil and filters, transmission fluids, antifreeze, refrigerants, paints, thinners, batteries, cleaning products, lubricants, degreasing agents, tires, and fuel. Consequently, our business is subject to a complex variety of federal, state, and local requirements that regulate the environment and public health and safety.
Most of our stores utilize aboveground storage tanks, and to a lesser extent underground storage tanks, primarily for petroleum-based products. Storage tanks are subject to periodic testing, containment, upgrading, and removal under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and its state law counterparts. Clean-up or other remedial action may be necessary in the event of leaks or other discharges from storage tanks or other sources. In addition, water quality protection programs under the federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act), the Safe Drinking Water Act, and comparable state and local programs govern certain discharges from some of our operations. Similarly, certain air emissions from operations, such as auto body painting, may be subject to the federal Clean Air Act and related state and local laws. Certain health and safety standards promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the United States Department of Labor and related state agencies also apply.
Some of our stores are parties to proceedings under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA, typically in connection with materials that were sent to former recycling, treatment, and/or disposal facilities owned and operated by independent businesses. The remediation or clean-up of facilities where the release of a regulated hazardous substance occurred is required under CERCLA and other laws.
We have a proactive strategy related to environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations, which includes contracting with third-party vendors to inspect our facilities periodically in an effort to ensure compliance. We incur significant costs to comply with applicable environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations in the ordinary course of our business. We do not anticipate, however, that the costs of such compliance will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, although such outcome is possible given the nature of our operations and the extensive environmental, health, and safety regulatory framework. We do not have any material known environmental commitments or contingencies.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive industry. We believe that the principal competitive factors in the automotive retail business are location, service, price, and selection. Each of our markets includes a large number of well-capitalized competitors that have extensive automotive retail managerial experience and strong retail locations and facilities. According to CNW Marketing Research, Inc., the total number of U.S. franchised automotive dealerships was approximately
15,900
and
15,600
at the end of
2012
and
2011
, respectively, and the total number of U.S. independent used vehicle dealers was approximately
37,900
and
37,600
at the end of
2012
and
2011
, respectively. We face competition from (i) several public companies that operate numerous automotive retail stores on a regional or national basis, including franchised dealers that sell new and used vehicles as well as non-franchised dealers that sell only used vehicles, (ii) private companies that operate automotive retail stores in our markets, and (iii) online marketplaces. We compete with dealers that sell the same vehicle brands that we sell, as well as those that sell other vehicle brands that we do not represent in a particular market. Our new vehicle store competitors have franchise agreements with the various vehicle manufacturers and, as such, generally have access to new vehicles on the same terms as we have. We also compete with other dealers for qualified employees, particularly for general managers and sales and service personnel.
7
In general, the vehicle manufacturers have designated marketing and sales areas within which only one franchised dealer of a given vehicle brand may operate. Under most of our framework agreements with the vehicle manufacturers, our ability to acquire multiple dealers of a given vehicle brand within a particular market is limited. We are also restricted by various state franchise laws from relocating our stores or establishing new stores of a particular vehicle brand within any area that is served by another dealer of the same vehicle brand, and we generally need the manufacturer to approve the relocation or grant a new franchise in order to relocate or establish a store. However, to the extent that a market has multiple dealers of a particular vehicle brand, as most of our key markets do with respect to most vehicle brands we sell, we face significant intra-brand competition.
We also compete with independent automobile service shops and service center chains. We believe that the principal competitive factors in the parts and service business are price, location, the use of factory-approved replacement parts, expertise with the particular vehicle lines, and customer service. We also compete with a broad range of financial institutions in our finance and insurance business. We believe that the principal competitive factors in the finance and insurance business are product selection, convenience, price, contract terms, and the ability to finance vehicle protection and aftermarket products.
Insurance and Bonding
Our business exposes us to the risk of liabilities arising out of our operations. For example, liabilities may arise out of claims of employees, customers, or other third parties for personal injury or property damage occurring in the course of our operations. We could also be subject to fines and civil and criminal penalties in connection with alleged violations of federal and state laws or regulatory requirements.
The automotive retail business is also subject to substantial risk of property loss due to the significant concentration of property values at store locations. In our case in particular, our operations are concentrated in states and regions in which natural disasters and severe weather events (such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, landslides, and hail storms) may subject us to substantial risk of property loss and operational disruption. Under self-insurance programs, we retain various levels of aggregate loss limits, per claim deductibles, and claims-handling expenses as part of our various insurance programs, including property and casualty, workers’ compensation, and employee medical benefits. Costs in excess of this retained risk per claim may be insured under various contracts with third-party insurance carriers. We estimate the ultimate costs of these retained insurance risks based on actuarial evaluation and historical claims experience, adjusted for current trends and changes in claims-handling procedures. The level of risk we retain may change in the future as insurance market conditions or other factors affecting the economics of our insurance purchasing change. Although we have, subject to certain limitations and exclusions, substantial insurance, we cannot assure you that we will not be exposed to uninsured or underinsured losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Provisions for retained losses and deductibles are made by charges to expense based upon periodic evaluations of the estimated ultimate liabilities on reported and unreported claims. The insurance companies that underwrite our insurance require that we secure certain of our obligations for deductible reimbursements with collateral. Our collateral requirements are set by the insurance companies and, to date, have been satisfied by posting surety bonds, letters of credit, and/or cash deposits. Our collateral requirements may change from time to time based on, among other things, our claims experience.
Employees
As of
December 31, 2012
, we employed approximately
21,000
full-time and part-time employees, approximately
200
of whom were covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe that we have good relations with our employees.
Seasonality
Our operations generally experience higher volumes of vehicle sales and service in the second and third quarters of each year due in part to consumer buying trends and the introduction of new vehicle models. Also, demand for vehicles and light trucks is generally lower during the winter months than in other seasons, particularly in regions of the United States where stores may be subject to adverse winter conditions. Accordingly, we expect our revenue and operating results generally to be lower in the first and fourth quarters as compared to the second and third quarters. However, revenue may be impacted significantly from quarter to quarter by changing economic conditions, vehicle manufacturer incentive programs, and actual or threatened severe weather events.
8
Trademarks
We own a number of registered service marks and trademarks, including, among other marks, AutoNation
®
. Pursuant to agreements with vehicle manufacturers, we have the right to use and display manufacturers’ trademarks, logos, and designs at our stores and in our advertising and promotional materials, subject to certain restrictions. We also have licenses pursuant to various agreements with third parties authorizing the use and display of the marks and/or logos of such third parties, subject to certain restrictions. The current registrations of our service marks and trademarks are effective for varying periods of time, which we may renew periodically, provided that we comply with all applicable laws.
Executive Officers of AutoNation
The following sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers as of February 13, 2013. Amounts reported under “Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned” include shares subject to stock options that become exercisable within 60 days of February 13, 2013.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Years with
AutoNation
|
Years in
Automotive
Industry
|
Number of
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
|
||||||
|
Mike Jackson
|
64
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
13
|
42
|
1,140,136
|
|
|||||
|
Michael E. Maroone
|
59
|
Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
|
16
|
38
|
3,476,487
|
|
|||||
|
Michael J. Short
|
51
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
6
|
6
|
384,713
|
|
|||||
|
Jonathan P. Ferrando
|
47
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
16
|
16
|
396,081
|
|
|||||
|
Alan J. McLaren
|
46
|
Senior Vice President, Customer Care
|
1
|
29
|
4,036
|
|
|||||
Mike Jackson
has served as our Chairman of the Board since January 2003, and as our Chief Executive Officer and Director since September 1999. From October 1998 until September 1999, Mr. Jackson served as Chief Executive Officer of Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, a North American operating unit of DaimlerChrysler AG, a multinational automotive manufacturing company. From April 1997 until September 1999, Mr. Jackson also served as President of Mercedes-Benz USA. From July 1990 until March 1997, Mr. Jackson served in various capacities at Mercedes-Benz USA, including as Executive Vice President immediately prior to his appointment as President of Mercedes-Benz USA. Mr. Jackson was also the managing partner from March 1979 to July 1990 of Euro Motorcars of Bethesda, Maryland, a regional group that owned and operated eleven automotive dealership franchises, including Mercedes-Benz and other brands of automobiles. In January 2011, Mr. Jackson was appointed to the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s Miami Branch.
Michael E. Maroone
has served as a director since July 2005 and as our President and Chief Operating Officer since August 1999. Following our acquisition of the Maroone Automotive Group in January 1997, Mr. Maroone served as President of our New Vehicle Dealer Division. In January 1998, Mr. Maroone was named President of our Automotive Retail Group with responsibility for our new and used vehicle operations. Prior to joining AutoNation, Mr. Maroone was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Maroone Automotive Group, one of the country’s largest privately-held automotive retail groups prior to its acquisition by us.
Michael J. Short
has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2007. From 2000 to January 2007, Mr. Short served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. (dba Universal Orlando) (“Universal Orlando”). From 2005 until January 2007, he also served as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Universal City Florida Holding Co. I, the limited partner of Universal Orlando, and Universal City Florida Holding Co. II, the general partner of Universal Orlando. From 1991 to 2000, Mr. Short held various finance positions at Universal Orlando, Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc., and IBM Corporation. Prior to that, he was a helicopter pilot and tactics instructor for the United States Navy, based out of Norfolk, Virginia.
9
Jonathan P. Ferrando
has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since March 2005. Prior thereto, he served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from January 2000 until March 2005. In addition to his role as General Counsel, in September 2004, Mr. Ferrando assumed responsibility for our human resources and labor relations functions, and in March 2011, he assumed responsibility for our corporate development function. Mr. Ferrando joined our Company in July 1996 and served in various capacities within our Company, including as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of our Automotive Retail Group from March 1998 until January 2000. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Ferrando was a corporate attorney with Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom from 1991 until 1996.
Alan J. McLaren
has served as our Senior Vice President, Customer Care, with responsibility for corporate initiatives in the area of parts and service, since January 2012. From February 2007 until December 2011, he was a senior executive with Mercedes-Benz USA, where he served as Vice President, Customer Services and President of Mercedes-Benz Manhattan. From June 2001 until February 2007, he was a senior executive with DaimlerChrysler Australia/Pacific.
Available Information
Our website is located at
www.autonation.com
, and our Investor Relations website is located at
investors.autonation.com
. The information on or accessible through our websites is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available, free of charge, on our Investor Relations website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
Our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects, and the prevailing market price and performance of our common stock may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the matters discussed below. Certain statements and information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including without limitation statements regarding our expectations for the automotive retail industry and the Company, as well as other written or oral statements made from time to time by us or by our authorized executive officers on our behalf, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements that describe our objectives, plans, or goals, are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “goal,” “plan,” “believe,” “continue,” “may,” “will,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events, and they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that are difficult to predict and may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report or when made, and we undertake no obligation to revise or update these statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. The risks, uncertainties, and other factors that our stockholders and prospective investors should consider include the following:
The automotive retail industry is sensitive to changing economic conditions and various other factors. Our business and results of operations are substantially dependent on new vehicle sales levels in the United States and in our particular geographic markets and the level of gross profit margins that we can achieve on our sales of new vehicles, all of which are very difficult to predict.
We believe that many factors affect sales of new vehicles and automotive retailers’ gross profit margins in the United States and in our particular geographic markets, including the economy, fuel prices, credit availability, interest rates, consumer confidence, the level of personal discretionary spending, unemployment rates, the state of housing markets, auto emission and fuel economy standards, the rate of inflation, currency exchange rates, the level of manufacturers’ production capacity, manufacturer incentives (and consumers’ reaction to such offers), intense industry competition, the prospects of war, other international conflicts or terrorist attacks, severe weather events, product quality, affordability and innovation, the number of consumers whose vehicle leases are expiring, and the length of consumer loans on existing vehicles. Changes in interest rates can significantly impact industry new vehicle sales and vehicle affordability due to the direct relationship between interest rates and monthly loan payments, a critical factor for many vehicle buyers, and the impact interest rates have on customers’ borrowing capacity and disposable income. Sales of certain new vehicles, particularly larger trucks and sport utility vehicles that historically have provided us with higher gross margins, are sensitive to fuel
10
prices and the level of construction activity. In addition, volatility in fuel prices can cause rapid shifts in consumer preferences which are difficult to accommodate given the long lead-time of inventory acquisition. In recent years, new vehicle sales have been impacted by unfavorable economic conditions in the United States, including low economic growth, high unemployment, and a decline in wealth resulting from depressed housing and equity markets, and the annual rate of new vehicle sales has remained below pre-recession levels.
Approximately
14.5 million
,
12.7 million
, and
11.5 million
new vehicles were sold in the United States in
2012
,
2011
, and
2010
, respectively. While we expect that the annual rate of U.S. new vehicle unit sales will improve in
2013
as compared to
2012
, there can be no assurance that it will. Further, our performance may differ from the performance of the automotive retail industry due to particular economic conditions and other factors in the geographic markets in which we operate. Economic conditions and the other factors described above may also materially adversely impact our sales of used vehicles, parts and automotive repair and maintenance services, and automotive finance and insurance products.
Our results of operations and financial condition have been and could continue to be adversely affected by the unfavorable economic conditions in the United States and/or Europe.
The unfavorable economic conditions that have affected the United States for the past few years, including low economic growth, high unemployment, and the decline in wealth resulting from depressed housing and equity markets, have adversely impacted the automotive retail market. Concerns over sovereign debt levels in the United States and/or the failure by Congress and the President of the United States to address federal deficits and rising debt levels or to raise the debt ceiling, and the possible negative implications to banks and the global economy arising out of the European debt crisis, could adversely impact the U.S. economy, credit availability, consumer confidence, and demand for new and used vehicles. Continuing or worsened unfavorable economic conditions in the United States or elsewhere could continue to adversely impact our business and results of operations.
If we are not able to maintain and enhance our retail brands and reputation, or if events occur that damage our retail brands and reputation, our business and financial results may be harmed.
We believe that we have built an excellent reputation as an automotive retailer in the United States. On January 31, 2013, we announced that we will begin marketing our Domestic and Import stores under the AutoNation retail brand. The re-branding of these stores, which previously operated under various local market retail brands, will take place throughout the first half of 2013. Our Premium Luxury stores will continue to operate under their existing retail brands. We believe that our continued success will depend on our ability to maintain and enhance the value of our retail brands across all of our sales channels. An isolated business incident at a single store could adversely affect our retail brands and reputation, particularly if such incident results in adverse publicity, governmental investigations, or litigation. The growing use of social and digital media by consumers increases the speed and extent that information and opinions can be shared, and negative posts or comments on social media platforms about AutoNation or any of our stores could materially damage our retail brands and reputation. All of our stores could be adversely affected if we fail to preserve the value of our retail brands or to maintain our reputation.
We will be investing substantial resources in marketing activities in order to extend and enhance the AutoNation retail brand. There can be no assurances that our marketing strategies will be successful or that the amount we invest in marketing activities will result in improved sales. If our marketing initiatives are not successful, we will have incurred significant expenses without the benefit of higher revenues.
Our debt agreements contain certain financial ratios and other restrictions on our ability to conduct our business, and our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and operations and prevent us from fulfilling our debt service obligations.
The credit agreement governing our term loan and revolving credit facilities, our mortgage facility, and the indentures relating to our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018 and 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020 contain covenants that limit the discretion of our management with respect to various business matters. These covenants place restrictions on, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances, and to sell or otherwise dispose of assets and to merge or consolidate with other entities. A failure by us to comply with the obligations contained in any of our debt agreements could result in an event of default, which could permit acceleration of the related debt as well as acceleration of debt under other debt agreements that contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions. If any debt is accelerated, our liquid assets may not be sufficient to repay in full such indebtedness and our other indebtedness. Additionally, we have
11
granted certain manufacturers the right to acquire, at fair market value, our automotive stores franchised by those manufacturers in specified circumstances in the event of our default under our debt agreements.
Under our credit agreement, we are required to remain in compliance with a maximum leverage ratio and a maximum capitalization ratio. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Restrictions and Covenants” in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K. If our earnings decline, we may be unable to comply with the financial ratios required by our credit agreement. In such case, we would seek an amendment or waiver of our credit agreement or consider other options, such as raising capital through an equity issuance to pay down debt, which could be dilutive to stockholders. There can be no assurance that our lenders would agree to an amendment or waiver of our credit agreement. In the event we obtain an amendment or waiver of our credit agreement, we would likely incur additional fees and higher interest expense.
As of
December 31, 2012
, we had approximately
$2.1 billion
of total indebtedness (including amounts outstanding under our mortgage facility and capital leases but excluding floorplan financing), and our subsidiaries also had
$2.5 billion
of floorplan financing. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example:
|
•
|
We may have difficulty satisfying our debt service obligations and, if we fail to comply with these requirements, an event of default could result;
|
|
•
|
We may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make required payments on indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate activities;
|
|
•
|
Covenants relating to our indebtedness may limit our ability to obtain financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate activities;
|
|
•
|
Covenants relating to our indebtedness may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
|
|
•
|
We may be more vulnerable to the impact of economic downturns and adverse developments in our business;
|
|
•
|
We may be placed at a competitive disadvantage against any less leveraged competitors;
|
|
•
|
Our variable interest rate debt will fluctuate with changing market conditions and, accordingly, our interest expense will increase if interest rates rise; and
|
|
•
|
Future share repurchases may be limited by the maximum leverage ratio described above.
|
The occurrence of any one of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
We are dependent upon the success and continued financial viability of the vehicle manufacturers and distributors with which we hold franchises.
The success of our stores is dependent on vehicle manufacturers in several key respects. First, we rely exclusively on the various vehicle manufacturers for our new vehicle inventory. Our ability to sell new vehicles is dependent on a vehicle manufacturer’s ability to produce and allocate to our stores an attractive, high-quality, and desirable product mix at the right time in order to satisfy customer demand. Second, manufacturers generally support their franchisees by providing direct financial assistance in various areas, including, among others, floorplan assistance and advertising assistance. Third, manufacturers provide product warranties and, in some cases, service contracts to customers. Our stores perform warranty and service contract work for vehicles under manufacturer product warranties and service contracts, and direct bill the manufacturer as opposed to invoicing the store customer. At any particular time, we have significant receivables from manufacturers for warranty and service work performed for customers. In addition, we rely on manufacturers to varying extents for original equipment manufactured replacement parts, training, product brochures and point of sale materials, and other items for our stores. Our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected as a result of any event that has a material adverse effect on the vehicle manufacturers or distributors that are our primary franchisors.
Vehicle manufacturers may be adversely impacted by economic downturns or recessions, significant declines in the sales of their new vehicles, natural disasters, increases in interest rates, adverse fluctuations in currency exchange rates,
12
declines in their credit ratings, labor strikes or similar disruptions (including within their major suppliers), supply shortages or rising raw material costs, rising employee benefit costs, adverse publicity that may reduce consumer demand for their products (including due to bankruptcy), product defects, vehicle recall campaigns, litigation, poor product mix or unappealing vehicle design, governmental laws and regulations, import product restrictions, or other adverse events.
Vehicle manufacturers are subject to federal fuel economy requirements, which will increase substantially as a result of a new national program being implemented by the U.S. government to regulate greenhouse gases and fuel economy standards. These new requirements could materially adversely affect the ability of manufacturers to produce, and our ability to sell, vehicles in demand by consumers at affordable prices, which could materially adversely impact our business. These and other risks could materially adversely affect any manufacturer and impact its ability to profitably design, market, produce, or distribute new vehicles, which in turn could materially adversely affect our ability to obtain or finance our desired new vehicle inventories, our ability to take advantage of manufacturer financial assistance programs, our ability to collect in full or on a timely basis our manufacturer warranty and other receivables, and/or our ability to obtain other goods and services provided by the impacted manufacturer.
The core brands of vehicles that we sell are manufactured by
Toyota, Ford, Honda, Nissan, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Chrysler, and Volkswagen
. These manufacturers have been adversely impacted by the unfavorable economic conditions that have affected the United States and elsewhere for the past few years. In the second quarter of 2009, each of Chrysler and General Motors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
Our business could be materially adversely impacted by another bankruptcy of a major vehicle manufacturer or related lender. For example, (i) a manufacturer in bankruptcy could attempt to terminate all or certain of our franchises, in which case we may not receive adequate compensation for our franchises, (ii) consumer demand for such manufacturer’s products could be materially adversely affected, (iii) a lender in bankruptcy could attempt to terminate our floorplan financing and demand repayment of any amounts outstanding, (iv) we may be unable to arrange financing for our customers for their vehicle purchases and leases through such lender, in which case we would be required to seek financing with alternate financing sources, which may be difficult to obtain on similar terms, if at all, (v) we may be unable to collect some or all of our significant receivables that are due from such manufacturer or lender, and we may be subject to preference claims relating to payments made by such manufacturer or lender prior to bankruptcy, and (vi) such manufacturer may be relieved of its indemnification obligations with respect to product liability claims. Additionally, any such bankruptcy may result in us being required to incur impairment charges with respect to the inventory, fixed assets, and intangible assets related to certain franchises, which could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to remain in compliance with the financial ratios contained in our debt agreements. Tens of billions of dollars of U.S. government support were provided to Chrysler, General Motors, and Ally Financial (formerly known as GMAC), and we believe that this support mitigated the potential adverse impacts to us resulting from the Chrysler and General Motors bankruptcies. There can be no assurance that U.S. government support will be provided to the same extent or at all in the event of another bankruptcy of a major vehicle manufacturer or related lender. As a result, the potential adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations could be relatively worse in a manufacturer or related lender bankruptcy which is not financially supported by the U.S. government.
Goodwill and other intangible assets comprise a significant portion of our total assets. We must test our goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment at least annually, which could result in a material, non-cash write-down of goodwill or franchise rights and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and shareholders’ equity.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are subject to impairment assessments at least annually (or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred) by applying a fair-value based test. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Goodwill” and “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Other Intangible Assets” in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our impairment testing. Our principal intangible assets are goodwill and our rights under our franchise agreements with vehicle manufacturers. An impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and shareholders’ equity.
Our new vehicle sales are impacted by the consumer incentive and marketing programs of vehicle manufacturers.
Most vehicle manufacturers from time to time establish various incentive and marketing programs designed to spur consumer demand for their vehicles. These programs impact our operations, particularly our sales of new vehicles. Since
13
these programs are often not announced in advance, they can be difficult to plan for when ordering inventory. Additionally, manufacturers may modify and discontinue these incentive and marketing programs from time to time, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.
Natural disasters and adverse weather events can disrupt our business.
Our stores are concentrated in states and regions in the United States, including primarily Florida, Texas, and California, in which actual or threatened natural disasters and severe weather events (such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, landslides, and hail storms) may disrupt our store operations, which may adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. In addition to business interruption, the automotive retail business is subject to substantial risk of property loss due to the significant concentration of property values at store locations. Although we have, subject to certain deductibles, limitations, and exclusions, substantial insurance, we cannot assure you that we will not be exposed to uninsured or underinsured losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
In addition, natural disasters may adversely impact new vehicle production and the global automotive supply chain. In 2011, the earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan and the flooding in Thailand caused significant production and supply chain disruptions that resulted in significantly reduced new vehicle production and lower new vehicle shipments by Japanese manufacturers. These disruptions also impacted non-Japanese manufacturers that rely on components produced in Japan and/or Thailand. In 2011, our unit sales of new vehicles were adversely impacted by these disruptions.
We are subject to restrictions imposed by, and significant influence from, vehicle manufacturers that may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects, including our ability to acquire additional stores.
Vehicle manufacturers and distributors with whom we hold franchises have significant influence over the operations of our stores. The terms and conditions of our framework, franchise, and related agreements and the manufacturers’ interests and objectives may, in certain circumstances, conflict with our interests and objectives. For example, manufacturers can set performance standards with respect to sales volume, sales effectiveness, and customer satisfaction, and can influence our ability to acquire additional stores, the naming and marketing of our stores, the operations of our e-commerce sites, our selection of store management, product stocking and advertising spending levels, and the level at which we capitalize our stores. Manufacturers also impose minimum facility requirements that can require significant capital expenditures. Manufacturers may also have certain rights to restrict our ability to provide guaranties of our operating companies, pledges of the capital stock of our subsidiaries, and liens on our assets, which could adversely impact our ability to obtain financing for our business and operations on favorable terms or at desired levels. From time to time, we are precluded under agreements with certain manufacturers from acquiring additional franchises, or subject to other adverse actions, to the extent we are not meeting certain performance criteria at our existing stores (with respect to matters such as sales volume, sales effectiveness, and customer satisfaction) until our performance improves in accordance with the agreements, subject to applicable state franchise laws.
Manufacturers also have the right to establish new franchises or relocate existing franchises, subject to applicable state franchise laws. The establishment or relocation of franchises in our markets could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects of our stores in the market in which the franchise action is taken.
Our framework, franchise, and related agreements also grant the manufacturer the right to terminate or compel us to sell our franchise for a variety of reasons (including uncured performance deficiencies, any unapproved change of ownership or management, or any unapproved transfer of franchise rights or impairment of financial standing or failure to meet capital requirements), subject to applicable state franchise laws. From time to time, certain major manufacturers assert sales and customer satisfaction performance deficiencies under the terms of our framework and franchise agreements. Additionally, our framework agreements contain restrictions regarding a change in control, which may be outside of our control. See “Agreements with Vehicle Manufacturers” in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K. While we believe that we will be able to renew all of our franchise agreements, we cannot guarantee that all of our franchise agreements will be renewed or that the terms of the renewals will be favorable to us. We cannot assure you that our stores will be able to comply with manufacturers’ sales, customer satisfaction performance, facility and other requirements in the future, which may affect our ability to acquire new stores or renew our franchise agreements, or subject us to other adverse actions, including termination or compelled sale of a franchise, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
14
results of operations, cash flows, and prospects. Furthermore, we rely on the protection of state franchise laws in the states in which we operate and if those laws are repealed or weakened, our framework, franchise, and related agreements may become more susceptible to termination, non-renewal, or renegotiation.
In addition, we have granted certain manufacturers the right to acquire, at fair market value, our automotive dealerships franchised by that manufacturer in specified circumstances in the event of our default under certain of our debt agreements.
We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings, which, if the outcomes are adverse to us, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, and prospects.
We are involved and will continue to be involved in numerous legal proceedings arising out of the conduct of our business, including litigation with customers, employment-related lawsuits, class actions, purported class actions, and actions brought by governmental authorities. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flow, and prospects.
Our operations are subject to extensive governmental laws and regulations. If we are found to be in violation of or subject to liabilities under any of these laws or regulations, or if new laws or regulations are enacted that adversely affect our operations, our business, operating results, and prospects could suffer.
The automotive retail industry, including our facilities and operations, is subject to a wide range of federal, state, and local laws and regulations, such as those relating to motor vehicle sales, retail installment sales, leasing, sales of finance, insurance, and vehicle protection products, licensing, consumer protection, consumer privacy, escheatment, anti-money laundering, environmental, vehicle emissions and fuel economy, health and safety, wage-hour, anti-discrimination, and other employment practices. With respect to motor vehicle sales, retail installment sales, leasing, and the sale of finance, insurance, and vehicle protection products at our stores, we are subject to various laws and regulations, the violation of which could subject us to consumer class action or other lawsuits or governmental investigations and adverse publicity, in addition to administrative, civil, or criminal sanctions. The violation of other laws and regulations to which we are subject also can result in administrative, civil, or criminal sanctions against us, which may include a cease and desist order against the subject operations or even revocation or suspension of our license to operate the subject business, as well as significant fines and penalties. We currently devote significant resources to comply with applicable federal, state, and local regulation of health, safety, environmental, zoning, and land use regulations, and we may need to spend additional time, effort, and money to keep our operations and existing or acquired facilities in compliance therewith. In addition, we may be subject to broad liabilities arising out of contamination at our currently and formerly owned or operated facilities, at locations to which hazardous substances were transported from such facilities, and at such locations related to entities formerly affiliated with us. Although for some such liabilities we believe we are entitled to indemnification from other entities, we cannot assure you that such entities will view their obligations as we do or will be able to satisfy them. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, and prospects.
The Dodd-Frank Act, which was signed into law on July 21, 2010, established a new consumer financial protection agency with broad regulatory powers. Although automotive dealers are generally excluded, the Dodd-Frank Act could lead to additional, indirect regulation of automotive dealers through its regulation of automotive finance companies and other financial institutions. In addition, we expect that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was signed into law on March 23, 2010, will increase our annual employee health care costs that we fund, with the most significant increases commencing in 2014, and significantly increase our cost of compliance and compliance risk related to offering health care benefits.
Furthermore, we expect that new laws and regulations, particularly at the federal level, in other areas may be enacted, which could also materially adversely impact our business. The labor policy of the current administration could lead to increased unionization efforts, which could lead to higher labor costs, disrupt our store operations, and reduce our profitability.
15
We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our vehicle floorplan payables, revolving credit facility, and term loan facility that could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.
Most of our debt, including our vehicle floorplan payable, is subject to variable interest rates. Our variable interest rate debt will fluctuate with changing market conditions and, accordingly, our interest expense will increase if interest rates rise. In addition, our net inventory carrying cost (new vehicle floorplan interest expense net of floorplan assistance that we receive from automotive manufacturers) may increase due to changes in interest rates, inventory levels, and manufacturer assistance. We cannot assure you that a significant increase in interest rates would not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Our largest stockholders, as a result of their ownership stakes in us, have the ability to exert substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our stockholders or Board of Directors. In addition, future share repurchases and flutuations in the levels of ownership of our largest stockholders could impact the volume of trading, liquidity, and market price of our common stock.
Based on filings made with the SEC through February 13, 2013, ESL Investments, Inc. together with certain of its investment affiliates (collectively, “ESL”) beneficially owns approximately
44%
of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, ESL has the ability to exert substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our stockholders, including the election of directors and any transactions involving a change of control.
Based on filings made with the SEC through February 13, 2013, Cascade Investment, L.L.C. (“Cascade”), which is solely owned by William H. Gates III, beneficially owns approximately
13%
of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust (the “Trust”), of which William H. Gates III is a co-trustee, beneficially owns approximately 2% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, Cascade and the Trust may have the ability to exert substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our stockholders. In addition, Michael Larson, the chief investment officer for William H. Gates III and Business Manager for Cascade, is one of our directors. Cascade and the Trust, therefore, may also have the ability to exert substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our Board.
In the future, our largest stockholders may acquire or dispose of shares of our common stock and thereby increase or decrease their ownership stake in us. Based on public filings made with the SEC, in the fourth quarter of 2012, ESL disposed of approximately 13.5 million shares of our common stock. Significant fluctuations in the levels of ownership of our largest stockholders could impact the volume of trading, liquidity, and market price of our common stock.
In the aggregate, based on filings made with the SEC through February 13, 2013, ESL, Cascade, the Trust, our executive officers, and our directors beneficially own approximately
62%
of our outstanding shares. Future share repurchases by the Company, together with any future share purchases by our affiliates, will reduce our “public float” (shares owned by non-affiliate stockholders and available for trading). Such reduction in our public float could decrease the volume of trading and liquidity of our common stock, could lead to increased volatility in the market price of our common stock, or could adversely impact the market price of our common stock.
A failure of our information systems or any security breach or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our business is dependent upon the efficient operation of our information systems. In particular, we rely on our information systems to effectively manage our pricing strategy and tools, sales, inventory, and service efforts, the preparation of our consolidated financial and operating data, consumer financing, and customer information. The failure of our information systems to perform as designed or the failure to maintain and enhance or protect the integrity of these systems could disrupt our business operations, impact sales and results of operations, expose us to customer or third-party claims, or result in adverse publicity. Additionally, we collect, process, and retain sensitive and confidential customer information in the normal course of our business. Despite the security measures we have in place and any additional measures we may implement in the future, our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, could be vulnerable to security breaches, computer viruses, lost or misplaced data, programming errors, human errors, acts of vandalism, or other events. Any security breach or event resulting in the misappropriation, loss, or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, whether by us directly or our third-party service providers, could damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of litigation and liability, disrupt our business, or otherwise affect our results of operations.
16
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
We lease our current corporate headquarters facility in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, pursuant to a lease expiring on December 31, 2020. As of February
2013
, we also own or lease numerous facilities relating to our operations under each of our operating segments. These facilities are located in the following 15 states: Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington. These facilities consist primarily of automobile showrooms, display lots, service facilities, collision repair centers, supply facilities, automobile storage lots, parking lots, and offices. We believe that our facilities are sufficient for our current needs and are in good condition in all material respects.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved and will continue to be involved in numerous legal proceedings arising out of the conduct of our business, including litigation with customers, employment-related lawsuits, class actions, purported class actions, and actions brought by governmental authorities. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flow, and prospects.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
17
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information, Holders, and Dividends
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AN.” The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock for the periods indicated.
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
|
2012
|
|||||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$
|
48.56
|
|
$
|
38.28
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
$
|
43.79
|
|
$
|
35.44
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
$
|
37.77
|
|
$
|
31.57
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
$
|
38.27
|
|
$
|
31.91
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$
|
41.51
|
|
$
|
30.46
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
$
|
41.55
|
|
$
|
32.18
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
$
|
37.30
|
|
$
|
31.07
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
$
|
36.07
|
|
$
|
27.32
|
|
|
As of
February 11, 2013
, there were approximately 1,932 holders of record of our common stock. A substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers, and other financial institutions.
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock during our two most recent fiscal years. We do not currently anticipate paying cash dividends for the foreseeable future.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The table below sets forth information with respect to shares of common stock repurchased by AutoNation, Inc. during
2012
.
|
Period
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
(1)
|
Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs
(in millions) (1) |
||||||||||
|
October 1, 2012 – October 31, 2012
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
368.2
|
|
||||
|
November 1, 2012 – November 30, 2012
|
1,323
|
|
$
|
39.86
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
368.2
|
|
||||
|
December 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012
|
1,250,000
|
|
$
|
39.21
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
$
|
319.2
|
|
||||
|
Total for three months ended December 31, 2012
|
1,251,323
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total for twelve months ended December 31, 2012
|
16,722,690
|
|
16,640,973
|
|
||||||||||
|
(1)
|
Our Board of Directors from time to time authorizes the repurchase of shares of our common stock up to a certain monetary limit. As of
December 31, 2012
,
$319.2 million
remained available under our stock repurchase authorization limit. Our stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date. In
2012
, all of our shares were repurchased under our stock repurchase program, except for
81,717
shares that were surrendered to AutoNation to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock or pay for an option exercise (
8,632
shares in the first quarter of
2012
,
28,303
shares in the second quarter of
2012
,
43,459
shares in the third quarter of
2012
, and
1,323
shares in the fourth quarter
2012
).
|
18
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph and table compare the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from December 31, 2007 through
December 31, 2012
with the performance of: (i) the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index and (ii) a self-constructed peer group consisting of other public companies in the automotive retail market, referred to as the “Public Auto Retail Peer Group.” The Public Auto Retail Peer Group consists of Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., CarMax, Inc., Group 1 Automotive, Inc., Lithia Motors, Inc., Penske Automotive Group, Inc., and Sonic Automotive, Inc., and these companies are weighted by market capitalization. We have created these comparisons using data supplied by Research Data Group, Inc. The comparisons reflected in the graph and table are not intended to forecast the future performance of our stock and may not be indicative of future performance. The graph and table assume that $100 was invested on December 31, 2007 in each of our common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and the Public Auto Retail Peer Group and that any dividends were reinvested.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Return for AutoNation, Inc.,
the S&P 500 Index, and the Public Auto Retail Peer Group
Copyright© 2013 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
|
12/07
|
12/08
|
12/09
|
12/10
|
12/11
|
12/12
|
||||||||||||
|
AutoNation Inc.
|
100.00
|
|
63.09
|
|
122.29
|
|
180.08
|
|
235.44
|
|
253.51
|
|
|||||
|
S&P 500
|
100.00
|
|
63.00
|
|
79.67
|
|
91.67
|
|
93.61
|
|
108.59
|
|
|||||
|
Public Auto Retail Peer Group
|
100.00
|
|
38.73
|
|
105.64
|
|
139.53
|
|
145.42
|
|
193.31
|
|
|||||
19
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the following Selected Financial Data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
|
|
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except per share data and unit sales)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
15,668.8
|
|
$
|
13,832.3
|
|
$
|
12,461.0
|
|
$
|
10,666.0
|
|
$
|
13,238.7
|
|
||||
|
Operating income (loss) less floorplan interest expense
(1) (2)
|
$
|
599.8
|
|
$
|
529.3
|
|
$
|
454.1
|
|
$
|
372.3
|
|
$
|
(1,360.9
|
)
|
||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
(2)
|
$
|
516.8
|
|
$
|
461.3
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
$
|
349.2
|
|
$
|
(1,401.5
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income (loss)
(2)
|
$
|
316.4
|
|
$
|
281.4
|
|
$
|
226.6
|
|
$
|
198.0
|
|
$
|
(1,243.1
|
)
|
||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Continuing operations
(2)
|
$
|
2.56
|
|
$
|
1.96
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
$
|
(6.82
|
)
|
||||
|
Discontinued operations
(2)
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
2.56
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
$
|
(6.99
|
)
|
||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
123.8
|
|
144.8
|
|
156.9
|
|
176.5
|
|
177.8
|
|
|||||||||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Continuing operations
(2)
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
$
|
(6.82
|
)
|
||||
|
Discontinued operations
(2)
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
$
|
(6.99
|
)
|
||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
125.8
|
|
147.3
|
|
158.6
|
|
177.3
|
|
177.8
|
|
|||||||||
|
Common shares outstanding, net of treasury stock
|
120.9
|
|
135.8
|
|
148.4
|
|
171.7
|
|
176.9
|
|
|||||||||
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
7,203.0
|
|
$
|
6,198.8
|
|
$
|
5,974.2
|
|
$
|
5,407.3
|
|
$
|
6,014.1
|
|
||||
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
$
|
2,066.3
|
|
$
|
1,634.4
|
|
$
|
1,340.6
|
|
$
|
1,105.0
|
|
$
|
1,225.6
|
|
||||
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
1,688.5
|
|
$
|
1,894.6
|
|
$
|
2,078.9
|
|
$
|
2,303.2
|
|
$
|
2,198.1
|
|
||||
|
Retail vehicle unit sales (continuing operations):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
267,810
|
|
224,034
|
|
206,456
|
|
182,160
|
|
241,625
|
|
|||||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
180,973
|
|
171,094
|
|
160,126
|
|
133,990
|
|
166,897
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
448,783
|
|
395,128
|
|
366,582
|
|
316,150
|
|
408,522
|
|
|||||||||
|
(1)
|
Operating income (loss) less floorplan interest expense is calculated by subtracting floorplan interest expense from operating income (loss), and is used as a key measure of profitability by management. Operating income (loss) and floorplan interest expense are each presented in our financial statements.
|
|
(2)
|
During 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $1.76 billion ($1.46 billion after-tax) associated with goodwill and franchise rights. During 2009, we reclassified impairment charges related to franchise rights of $19.1 million ($11.7 million after-tax) that were recorded during 2008 to Loss from Discontinued Operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2008, as the stores associated with these impairment charges were reclassified to discontinued operations during 2009.
|
See the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of Shareholders’ Equity (Note
9
), Income Taxes (Note
11
), Earnings (Loss) Per Share (Note
12
), Discontinued Operations (Note
13
), Acquisitions (Note
14
), and Segment Information (
Note 20
), and the effect on comparability of year-to-year data. See Part II, Item 5 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of our dividend policy.
20
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Part I, including matters set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of this Form 10-K, and our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Except to the extent that differences among operating segments are material to an understanding of our business taken as a whole, we present the discussion in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on a consolidated basis.
Overview
AutoNation, Inc., through its subsidiaries, is the largest automotive retailer in the United States. As of
December 31, 2012
, we owned and operated
265
new vehicle franchises from
221
stores located in the United States, predominantly in major metropolitan markets in the Sunbelt region. Our stores, which we believe include some of the most recognizable and well known in our key markets, sell
32
different new vehicle brands. The core brands of new vehicles that we sell, representing approximately
95%
of the new vehicles that we sold in
2012
, are manufactured by
Toyota, Ford, Honda, Nissan, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Chrysler, and Volkswagen
.
We offer a diversified range of automotive products and services, including new vehicles, used vehicles, “parts and service,” which includes automotive repair and maintenance services as well as wholesale parts and collision businesses, and automotive “finance and insurance” products, which includes the arranging of financing for vehicle purchases through third-party finance sources.
As of
December 31, 2012
, we had three operating segments: Domestic, Import, and Premium Luxury. As of March 31, 2012, we revised the basis of segmentation of our Import and Premium Luxury segments to reclassify Audi franchises from the Import segment to the Premium Luxury segment. In connection with this change, we reclassified historical amounts to conform to our current segment presentation. We reclassified revenue of
$187.7 million
and segment income of
$13.2 million
for 2011, and revenue of
$126.2 million
and segment income of
$11.3 million
for 2010 related to the five Audi franchises we held during these periods.
Our Domestic segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell new vehicles manufactured by General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler. Our Import segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell new vehicles manufactured primarily by Toyota, Honda, and Nissan. Our Premium Luxury segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell new vehicles manufactured primarily by Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Lexus. The franchises in each segment also sell used vehicles, parts and automotive repair and maintenance services, and automotive finance and insurance products.
For the year ended
December 31, 2012
, new vehicle sales accounted for approximately
57%
of our total revenue, but approximately
23%
of our total gross profit. Used vehicle sales accounted for approximately
24%
of our total revenue, and approximately
12%
of our total gross profit. Our parts and service and finance and insurance operations, while comprising approximately
19%
of total revenue, contributed approximately
64%
of our gross profit.
Results of Operations
We had net income from continuing operations of
$317.3 million
and diluted earnings per share of
$2.52
in
2012
, as compared to net income from continuing operations of
$284.2 million
and diluted earnings per common share of
$1.93
in
2011
, and net income from continuing operations of
$235.3 million
and diluted earnings per common share of
$1.48
in
2010
.
The 2012 results were impacted by a non-cash franchise rights impairment charge of $4.2 million ($2.6 million after-tax).
The 2011 results were impacted by a loss on debt extinguishment, including debt refinancing costs and the write-off of previously deferred debt issuance costs, of $2.2 million ($1.4 million after-tax).
The 2010 results were impacted by a loss on debt extinguishment, including debt refinancing costs and the write-off of previously deferred debt issuance costs, of $19.6 million ($12.1 million after-tax).
21
Acquisitions
On December 21, 2012, we acquired Boardwalk Audi, Boardwalk Porsche, Boardwalk Volkswagen, Park Cities Volkswagen, and McKinney Volkswagen in the Dallas, Texas market and Spring Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram in the Houston, Texas market. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions was
$203.7 million
, including
$141.6 million
paid at closing and
$62.1 million
in liabilities related to capital leases and deferred purchase price commitments.
Market Conditions
Full-year U.S. industry new vehicle unit sales were
14.5 million
in
2012
, as compared to
12.7 million
in
2011
and
11.5 million
in
2010
. In
2012
, new vehicle industry sales were driven in part by replacement demand. Based on industry data, the average age of cars and trucks in the United States is at a record high of nearly 11 years compared to an average age of 9 years during the period from 2000 to 2007. A robust consumer credit environment and an increase in new product offerings from automotive manufacturers were also supportive of a strong selling environment. Further, inventory levels of vehicles produced by Japanese manufacturers were significantly improved as compared to 2011, as vehicle production by Japanese manufacturers was adversely impacted in 2011 by the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan.
We currently anticipate full-year U.S. industry new vehicle unit sales will increase to the mid-15 million unit level in
2013
driven by replacement need, attractive products, and continued access to affordable credit. We also believe that improving conditions in the housing market may be supportive of sales. However, actual sales may materially differ.
The rate of industry new vehicle unit sales over the past few years has led to a decline in the number of recent-model-year vehicles in operation, our primary service base. We expect our parts and service business to benefit as the units in operation in our primary service base begin increasing in 2013. We expect that our parts and service business will continue to benefit over the next several years as this service base is expected to gradually return to pre-recession levels.
Inventory Management
Our new and used vehicle inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We monitor our vehicle inventory levels closely based on current economic conditions and seasonal sales trends.
We have generally not experienced losses on the sale of new vehicle inventory, in part due to incentives provided by manufacturers to promote sales of new vehicles and our inventory management practices. We had
58,819
units in new vehicle inventory at
December 31, 2012
, and
43,906
units at
December 31, 2011
.
We recondition the majority of used vehicles acquired for retail sale in our parts and service departments and capitalize the related costs to the used vehicle inventory. Used vehicles that are not sold on a retail basis are generally liquidated at wholesale auctions. We record estimated losses on used vehicle inventory. Our used vehicle inventory balance was net of cumulative write-downs of
$1.2 million
at
December 31, 2012
, and
$0.9 million
at
December 31, 2011
.
Parts, accessories, and other inventory are carried at the lower of acquisition cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. We estimate the amount of potential obsolete inventory based upon past experience and market trends. Our parts, accessories, and other inventory balance was net of cumulative write-downs of
$3.2 million
at
December 31, 2012
, and
$2.8 million
at
December 31, 2011
.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis and we base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable. Actual outcomes could differ materially from those estimates in a manner that could have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Set forth below are the policies and estimates that we have identified as critical to our business operations and an understanding of our results of operations, based on the high degree of judgment or complexity in their application.
22
Goodwill
Goodwill for our Domestic, Import, and Premium Luxury reporting units is tested for impairment annually on April 30 or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.
Under accounting standards, we chose to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it was necessary to calculate the fair values of our reporting units under the two-step goodwill impairment test. We completed our qualitative assessment of potential goodwill impairment as of April 30, 2012, and we determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units were less than their carrying amounts.
The quantitative goodwill impairment analysis is dependent on many variables used to determine the fair value of our reporting units. See Note
5
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on how the fair values and carrying values of our reporting units are derived for the quantitative goodwill impairment test.
As of
December 31, 2012
, we have
$165.2 million
of goodwill related to the Domestic reporting unit,
$534.2 million
related to the Import reporting unit, and
$538.0 million
related to the Premium Luxury reporting unit. The fair values of the Domestic, Import, and Premium Luxury reporting units were substantially in excess of their carrying values as of April 30, 2011, the date of our most recent quantitative impairment test.
Other Intangible Assets
Our principal identifiable intangible assets are individual store rights under franchise agreements with vehicle manufacturers, which have indefinite lives and are tested at least annually on April 30 for impairment. The impairment test for intangibles with indefinite lives requires the comparison of estimated fair value to its carrying value by store. Fair values of rights under franchise agreements are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows of the store. The forecasted cash flows contain inherent uncertainties, including significant estimates and assumptions related to growth rates, margins, working capital requirements, capital expenditures, and cost of capital, for which we utilize certain market participant-based assumptions, using third-party industry projections, economic projections, and other marketplace data we believe to be reasonable. See Note
17
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on how fair value measurements are derived for our franchise rights.
We completed our annual impairment test for our franchise rights as of April 30,
2012
, and we recorded
$4.2 million
(
$2.6 million
after-tax) of non-cash impairment charges related to rights under a Premium Luxury store’s franchise agreement. This non-cash impairment charge was recorded to reduce the carrying value of the store’s franchise agreement to its estimated fair value. Our franchise rights, which related to
27
franchises and totaled
$208.4 million
at April 30,
2012
, are evaluated for impairment on a franchise-by-franchise basis. If the fair value of each of our franchise rights had been determined to be a hypothetical 10% lower as of the valuation date of April 30,
2012
, we would not have had to record any additional impairment charges.
Long-Lived Assets
We estimate the depreciable lives of our property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, and review them for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may be impaired. Such events or changes may include a significant decrease in market value, a significant change in the business climate in a particular market, a current expectation that more-likely-than-not a long-lived asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life, or a current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with historical losses or projected future losses.
When evaluating potential impairment of long-lived assets held and used, we first compare the carrying amount of the asset group to the asset group’s estimated future undiscounted cash flows. If the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset group, we then compare the carrying amount of the asset group to the asset group’s estimated fair value to determine if impairment exists. The fair value measurements for our long-lived assets held and used were based on Level 3 inputs, which considered information obtained from third-party real estate valuation sources. See Note
17
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our fair value measurements. We recognize an impairment loss if the amount of the asset group’s carrying amount exceeds the asset group’s estimated fair value. If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset group becomes
23
its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis will be depreciated over the remaining useful life of that asset.
During
2012
, we fully impaired certain long-lived assets held and used in continuing operations and recorded non-cash impairment charges of
$0.8 million
. These charges are recorded as a component of Other Expenses (Income), Net in the Consolidated Statements of Income and are reported in the “Corporate and other” category of our segment information.
When property and equipment is identified as held for sale, we reclassify the held for sale assets to Other Current Assets and cease recording depreciation. We measure each long-lived asset or disposal group at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and recognize a loss for any initial adjustment of the long-lived asset’s or disposal group’s carrying amount to fair value less cost to sell in the period the “held for sale” criteria are met. We periodically evaluate the carrying value of assets held for sale to determine if, based on market conditions, the values of these assets should be adjusted. Any subsequent change in the fair value less cost to sell (increase or decrease) of each asset held for sale is reported as an adjustment to its carrying amount, except that the adjusted carrying amount cannot exceed the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or disposal group at the time it was initially classified as held for sale. Such valuations include estimations of fair values and incremental direct costs to transact a sale. The fair value measurements for our long-lived assets held for sale were based on Level 3 inputs, which considered information obtained from third-party real estate valuation sources, or, in certain cases, pending agreements to sell the related assets.
We had assets held for sale in continuing operations of
$70.4 million
at
December 31, 2012
, and
$70.1 million
at December 31,
2011
. We recorded
no
impairment charges during
2012
and impairment charges of
$1.1 million
during
2011
associated with assets held for sale in continuing operations to reduce the carrying value of these assets to fair value less cost to sell. During 2011, we also recorded $1.1 million of non-cash impairment charges related to a valuation adjustment for the cumulative depreciation not recorded during the held for sale period for continuing operations assets that were reclassified from held for sale to held and used during 2011. The
2011
charges are recorded as a component of Other Expenses (Income), Net in the Consolidated Statements of Income and are reported in the “Corporate and other” category of our segment information.
We had assets held for sale in discontinued operations of
$43.2 million
at December 31,
2012
, and
$49.5 million
at December 31,
2011
. We recorded
$0.1 million
during
2012
and
$0.5 million
during
2011
of non-cash impairment charges associated with assets held for sale in discontinued operations to reduce the carrying value of these assets to fair value less cost to sell. These charges are recorded as a component of Loss from Discontinued Operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Our impairment loss calculations contain uncertainties because they require us to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future undiscounted cash flows and asset fair values, including forecasting useful lives of the assets. Although we believe our property and equipment and assets held for sale are appropriately valued, the assumptions and estimates used may change and we may be required to record impairment charges to reduce the value of these assets.
Chargeback Reserve
Revenue on finance and insurance products represents commissions earned by us for: (i) loans and leases placed with financial institutions in connection with customer vehicle purchases financed, (ii) vehicle service contracts sold, and (iii) insurance and other products sold. We primarily sell these products on a straight commission basis; however we also participate in future underwriting profit on certain extended service contracts pursuant to retrospective commission arrangements, which are recognized as earned.
We may be charged back for commissions related to financing, insurance, or vehicle protection products in the event of early termination, default, or prepayment of the contracts by customers (“chargebacks”). However, our exposure to loss in connection with financing arrangements generally is limited to the commissions that we receive. These commissions are recorded at the time of the sale of the vehicles, net of an estimated liability for chargebacks.
We estimate our liability for chargebacks on an individual product basis using our historical chargeback experience, based primarily on cancellation data we receive from third parties that sell and administer these products. Our estimated liability for chargebacks totaled
$56.0 million
at
December 31, 2012
, and
$46.2 million
at
December 31, 2011
.
Chargebacks are influenced by the volume of vehicle sales in recent years and increases or decreases in early termination rates resulting from cancellation of vehicle protection products, defaults, refinancings, payoffs before maturity,
24
and other factors. While we consider these factors in the estimation of our chargeback liability, actual events may differ from our estimates, which could result in a change in our estimated liability for chargebacks. The
increase
in our liability for chargebacks is largely attributable to higher volume of vehicle sales in recent years, as well as an increase in customer cancellations of finance and insurance products. A 10% change in our estimated cancellation rates would have changed our estimated liability for chargebacks at
December 31, 2012
, by approximately
$5.6 million
.
See Note
19
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding chargeback liabilities.
Self Insurance Reserves
Under our self insurance programs, we retain various levels of aggregate loss limits, per claim deductibles, and claims-handling expenses as part of our various insurance programs, including property and casualty, employee medical benefits, automobile, and workers’ compensation. Costs in excess of this retained risk per claim may be insured under various contracts with third-party insurance carriers. We review our claim and loss history on a periodic basis to assist in assessing our future liability. The ultimate costs of these retained insurance risks are estimated by management and by third-party actuarial evaluation of historical claims experience, adjusted for current trends and changes in claims-handling procedures. Our results could be materially impacted by claims and other expenses related to our self insurance programs if future occurrences and claims differ from these assumptions and historical trends. Self insurance reserves totaled
$61.5 million
at
December 31, 2012
, and
$58.2 million
at
December 31, 2011
. We believe our actual loss experience has not been materially different from our recorded estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue consists of the sales of new and used vehicles, sales of parts and services, commissions from finance and insurance products, and sales of other products. We recognize revenue in the period in which products are sold or services are provided. We recognize vehicle and finance and insurance revenue when a sales contract has been executed, the vehicle has been delivered, and payment has been received or financing has been arranged. Rebates, holdbacks, floorplan assistance, and certain other incentives received from manufacturers are recorded as a reduction of the cost of the vehicle and recognized into income upon the sale of the vehicle or when earned under a specific manufacturer program, whichever is later. See Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding revenue recognition.
Income Taxes
Estimates and judgments are used in the calculation of certain tax liabilities and in the determination of the recoverability of certain deferred tax assets. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We regularly evaluate the recoverability of our deferred tax assets and provide valuation allowances to offset portions of deferred tax assets due to uncertainty surrounding the future realization of such deferred tax assets. Valuation allowances are based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences, and the implementation of tax-planning strategies. We adjust the valuation allowance in the period we determine it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will or will not be realized. If a change in circumstances results in a change in our ability to realize our deferred tax assets, our tax provision would be adjusted in the period when the change in circumstances occurs.
Accounting for our income taxes also requires significant judgment in the evaluation of our uncertain tax positions and in the calculation of our provision for income taxes. Accounting standards related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes prescribe a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate available evidence to determine if it appears more likely than not that an uncertain tax position will be sustained on an audit by a taxing authority, based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settling the uncertain tax position.
Although we believe we have adequately reserved for our uncertain tax positions, the ultimate outcome of these tax matters may differ from our expectations. We adjust our reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the completion of a tax audit, expiration of a statute of limitations, the refinement of an estimate, and interest accruals associated with uncertain tax positions until they are resolved. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made.
25
Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in our deferred tax assets or liabilities, the valuation of our uncertain tax positions, or by changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles, or interpretations thereof.
Other
Additionally, estimates have been made by us in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements including allowances for doubtful accounts, accruals related to certain legal proceedings, estimated losses from disposals of discontinued operations, and certain assumptions related to determining stock-based compensation.
26
Reported Operating Data
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions, except per vehicle data)
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
$
|
8,906.9
|
|
$
|
7,498.9
|
|
$
|
1,408.0
|
|
18.8
|
|
$
|
6,669.1
|
|
$
|
829.8
|
|
12.4
|
|
||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
3,714.7
|
|
3,512.8
|
|
201.9
|
|
5.7
|
|
3,116.1
|
|
396.7
|
|
12.7
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Parts and service
|
2,399.2
|
|
2,293.1
|
|
106.1
|
|
4.6
|
|
2,209.1
|
|
84.0
|
|
3.8
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Finance and insurance, net
|
571.2
|
|
474.5
|
|
96.7
|
|
20.4
|
|
418.9
|
|
55.6
|
|
13.3
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Other
|
76.8
|
|
53.0
|
|
23.8
|
|
47.8
|
|
5.2
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
15,668.8
|
|
$
|
13,832.3
|
|
$
|
1,836.5
|
|
13.3
|
|
$
|
12,461.0
|
|
$
|
1,371.3
|
|
11.0
|
|
||||||
|
Gross profit:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
$
|
579.5
|
|
$
|
547.7
|
|
$
|
31.8
|
|
5.8
|
|
$
|
451.2
|
|
$
|
96.5
|
|
21.4
|
|
||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
299.3
|
|
284.8
|
|
14.5
|
|
5.1
|
|
266.7
|
|
18.1
|
|
6.8
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Parts and service
|
1,007.9
|
|
970.1
|
|
37.8
|
|
3.9
|
|
963.2
|
|
6.9
|
|
0.7
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Finance and insurance
|
571.2
|
|
474.5
|
|
96.7
|
|
20.4
|
|
418.9
|
|
55.6
|
|
13.3
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Other
|
28.5
|
|
26.9
|
|
1.6
|
|
27.5
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total gross profit
|
2,486.4
|
|
2,304.0
|
|
182.4
|
|
7.9
|
|
2,127.5
|
|
176.5
|
|
8.3
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
1,749.5
|
|
1,649.4
|
|
(100.1
|
)
|
(6.1
|
)
|
1,552.1
|
|
(97.3
|
)
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
87.3
|
|
83.7
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
76.8
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Franchise rights impairment
|
4.2
|
|
—
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other expenses (income), net
|
0.1
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
(1.2
|
)
|
2.0
|
|
3.1
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating income
|
645.3
|
|
572.0
|
|
73.3
|
|
12.8
|
|
496.6
|
|
75.4
|
|
15.2
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Non-operating income (expense) items:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Floorplan interest expense
|
(45.5
|
)
|
(42.7
|
)
|
(2.8
|
)
|
(42.5
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other interest expense
|
(86.9
|
)
|
(66.0
|
)
|
(20.9
|
)
|
(56.1
|
)
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Loss on debt extinguishment
|
—
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
2.2
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
17.4
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Interest income
|
0.3
|
|
0.7
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
1.4
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other income (losses), net
|
3.6
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
4.1
|
|
1.5
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
$
|
516.8
|
|
$
|
461.3
|
|
$
|
55.5
|
|
12.0
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
$
|
80.0
|
|
21.0
|
|
||||||
|
Retail vehicle unit sales:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
267,810
|
|
224,034
|
|
43,776
|
|
19.5
|
|
206,456
|
|
17,578
|
|
8.5
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
180,973
|
|
171,094
|
|
9,879
|
|
5.8
|
|
160,126
|
|
10,968
|
|
6.8
|
|
|||||||||||
|
448,783
|
|
395,128
|
|
53,655
|
|
13.6
|
|
366,582
|
|
28,546
|
|
7.8
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenue per vehicle retailed:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
$
|
33,258
|
|
$
|
33,472
|
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
(0.6
|
)
|
$
|
32,303
|
|
$
|
1,169
|
|
3.6
|
|
||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
$
|
17,850
|
|
$
|
17,812
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
0.2
|
|
$
|
17,266
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
3.2
|
|
||||||
|
Gross profit per vehicle retailed:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
$
|
2,164
|
|
$
|
2,445
|
|
$
|
(281
|
)
|
(11.5
|
)
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
11.9
|
|
||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
$
|
1,623
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
1.7
|
|
||||||
|
Finance and insurance
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
6.0
|
|
$
|
1,143
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
5.1
|
|
||||||
27
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||
|
|
2012 (%)
|
2011 (%)
|
2010 (%)
|
||
|
Revenue mix percentages:
|
|||||
|
New vehicle
|
56.8
|
54.2
|
53.5
|
||
|
Used vehicle
|
23.7
|
25.4
|
25.0
|
||
|
Parts and service
|
15.3
|
16.6
|
17.7
|
||
|
Finance and insurance, net
|
3.6
|
3.4
|
3.4
|
||
|
Other
|
0.6
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
||
|
Total
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
||
|
Gross profit mix percentages:
|
|||||
|
New vehicle
|
23.3
|
23.8
|
21.2
|
||
|
Used vehicle
|
12.0
|
12.4
|
12.5
|
||
|
Parts and service
|
40.5
|
42.1
|
45.3
|
||
|
Finance and insurance
|
23.0
|
20.6
|
19.7
|
||
|
Other
|
1.2
|
1.1
|
1.3
|
||
|
Total
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
||
|
Operating items as a percentage of revenue:
|
|||||
|
Gross profit:
|
|||||
|
New vehicle
|
6.5
|
7.3
|
6.8
|
||
|
Used vehicle-retail
|
9.1
|
9.2
|
9.3
|
||
|
Parts and service
|
42.0
|
42.3
|
43.6
|
||
|
Total
|
15.9
|
16.7
|
17.1
|
||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
11.2
|
11.9
|
12.5
|
||
|
Operating income
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
4.0
|
||
|
Other operating items as a percentage of total gross profit:
|
|||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
70.4
|
71.6
|
73.0
|
||
|
Operating income
|
26.0
|
24.8
|
23.3
|
||
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
|
||
|
Days supply:
|
|||||
|
New vehicle (industry standard of selling days, including fleet)
|
55 days
|
50 days
|
|||
|
Used vehicle (trailing calendar month days)
|
35 days
|
31 days
|
|||
The following table details net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit, consisting of new vehicle floorplan interest expense net of floorplan assistance earned (amounts received from manufacturers specifically to support store financing of new vehicle inventory). Floorplan assistance is accounted for as a component of new vehicle gross profit.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance 2012 vs. 2011
|
2010
|
Variance 2011 vs. 2010
|
||||||||||||||
|
Floorplan assistance
|
$
|
73.5
|
|
$
|
61.1
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
$
|
55.6
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
||||
|
Floorplan interest expense (new vehicles)
|
(43.7
|
)
|
(40.3
|
)
|
(3.4
|
)
|
(40.2
|
)
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
$
|
20.8
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
||||
28
Same Store Operating Data
We have presented below our operating results on a same store basis to reflect our internal performance. The “Same Store” amounts presented below include the results of dealerships for the identical months in each period presented in the comparison, commencing with the first full month in which the dealership was owned by us. For example, the results for a dealership acquired in February
2011
would be included only in our same store comparison of
2012
to
2011
, not in our same store comparison of
2011
to
2010
. Therefore, the amounts presented in the year
2011
column that is being compared to the
2012
column may differ from the amounts presented in the year
2011
column that is being compared to the year
2010
column.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions, except per vehicle data)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2011
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
$
|
8,854.6
|
|
$
|
7,498.9
|
|
$
|
1,355.7
|
|
18.1
|
|
$
|
7,307.6
|
|
$
|
6,669.1
|
|
$
|
638.5
|
|
9.6
|
|
|||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
3,682.5
|
|
3,512.8
|
|
169.7
|
|
4.8
|
|
3,415.0
|
|
3,116.1
|
|
298.9
|
|
9.6
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Parts and service
|
2,388.2
|
|
2,293.1
|
|
95.1
|
|
4.1
|
|
2,250.9
|
|
2,209.1
|
|
41.8
|
|
1.9
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Finance and insurance, net
|
568.1
|
|
474.5
|
|
93.6
|
|
19.7
|
|
463.9
|
|
418.9
|
|
45.0
|
|
10.7
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other
|
76.0
|
|
53.0
|
|
23.0
|
|
52.2
|
|
47.8
|
|
4.4
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
15,569.4
|
|
$
|
13,832.3
|
|
$
|
1,737.1
|
|
12.6
|
|
$
|
13,489.6
|
|
$
|
12,461.0
|
|
$
|
1,028.6
|
|
8.3
|
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
$
|
576.1
|
|
$
|
547.7
|
|
$
|
28.4
|
|
5.2
|
|
$
|
533.4
|
|
$
|
451.2
|
|
$
|
82.2
|
|
18.2
|
|
|||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
297.0
|
|
284.8
|
|
12.2
|
|
4.3
|
|
279.7
|
|
266.7
|
|
13.0
|
|
4.9
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Parts and service
|
1,003.2
|
|
970.1
|
|
33.1
|
|
3.4
|
|
950.7
|
|
963.2
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Finance and insurance
|
568.1
|
|
474.5
|
|
93.6
|
|
19.7
|
|
463.9
|
|
418.9
|
|
45.0
|
|
10.7
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other
|
28.2
|
|
26.9
|
|
1.3
|
|
26.4
|
|
27.5
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total gross profit
|
$
|
2,472.6
|
|
$
|
2,304.0
|
|
$
|
168.6
|
|
7.3
|
|
$
|
2,254.1
|
|
$
|
2,127.5
|
|
$
|
126.6
|
|
6.0
|
|
|||||||
|
Retail vehicle unit sales:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
266,050
|
|
224,034
|
|
42,016
|
|
18.8
|
|
217,685
|
|
206,456
|
|
11,229
|
|
5.4
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
179,669
|
|
171,094
|
|
8,575
|
|
5.0
|
|
167,563
|
|
160,126
|
|
7,437
|
|
4.6
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total
|
445,719
|
|
395,128
|
|
50,591
|
|
12.8
|
|
385,248
|
|
366,582
|
|
18,666
|
|
5.1
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Revenue per vehicle retailed:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
$
|
33,282
|
|
$
|
33,472
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
(0.6
|
)
|
$
|
33,570
|
|
$
|
32,303
|
|
$
|
1,267
|
|
3.9
|
|
|||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
$
|
17,860
|
|
$
|
17,812
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
0.3
|
|
$
|
17,818
|
|
$
|
17,266
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
3.2
|
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit per vehicle retailed:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
$
|
2,165
|
|
$
|
2,445
|
|
$
|
(280
|
)
|
(11.5
|
)
|
$
|
2,450
|
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
12.1
|
|
|||||||
|
Used vehicle
|
$
|
1,622
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
(1.1
|
)
|
$
|
1,642
|
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
1.9
|
|
|||||||
|
Finance and insurance
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
6.2
|
|
$
|
1,204
|
|
$
|
1,143
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
5.3
|
|
|||||||
29
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||
|
|
2012 (%)
|
2011 (%)
|
2011 (%)
|
2010 (%)
|
|||
|
Revenue mix percentages:
|
|||||||
|
New vehicle
|
56.9
|
54.2
|
54.2
|
53.5
|
|||
|
Used vehicle
|
23.7
|
25.4
|
25.3
|
25.0
|
|||
|
Parts and service
|
15.3
|
16.6
|
16.7
|
17.7
|
|||
|
Finance and insurance, net
|
3.6
|
3.4
|
3.4
|
3.4
|
|||
|
Other
|
0.5
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
|||
|
Total
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|||
|
Gross profit mix percentages:
|
|||||||
|
New vehicle
|
23.3
|
23.8
|
23.7
|
21.2
|
|||
|
Used vehicle
|
12.0
|
12.4
|
12.4
|
12.5
|
|||
|
Parts and service
|
40.6
|
42.1
|
42.2
|
45.3
|
|||
|
Finance and insurance
|
23.0
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
19.7
|
|||
|
Other
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.3
|
|||
|
Total
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|||
|
Operating items as a percentage of revenue:
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit:
|
|||||||
|
New vehicle
|
6.5
|
7.3
|
7.3
|
6.8
|
|||
|
Used vehicle-retail
|
9.1
|
9.2
|
9.2
|
9.3
|
|||
|
Parts and service
|
42.0
|
42.3
|
42.2
|
43.6
|
|||
|
Total
|
15.9
|
16.7
|
16.7
|
17.1
|
|||
30
New Vehicle
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions, except per vehicle data)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
2010
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reported:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
8,906.9
|
|
$
|
7,498.9
|
|
$
|
1,408.0
|
|
18.8
|
|
$
|
6,669.1
|
|
$
|
829.8
|
|
12.4
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
579.5
|
|
$
|
547.7
|
|
$
|
31.8
|
|
5.8
|
|
$
|
451.2
|
|
$
|
96.5
|
|
21.4
|
||||||
|
Retail vehicle unit sales
|
267,810
|
|
224,034
|
|
43,776
|
|
19.5
|
|
206,456
|
|
17,578
|
|
8.5
|
|||||||||||
|
Revenue per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
33,258
|
|
$
|
33,472
|
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
(0.6
|
)
|
$
|
32,303
|
|
$
|
1,169
|
|
3.6
|
||||||
|
Gross profit per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
2,164
|
|
$
|
2,445
|
|
$
|
(281
|
)
|
(11.5
|
)
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
11.9
|
||||||
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue
|
6.5
|
%
|
7.3
|
%
|
6.8
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Days supply (industry standard of selling days, including fleet)
|
55 days
|
|
50 days
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Same Store:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
8,854.6
|
|
$
|
7,498.9
|
|
$
|
1,355.7
|
|
18.1
|
|
$
|
7,307.6
|
|
$
|
6,669.1
|
|
$
|
638.5
|
|
9.6
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
576.1
|
|
$
|
547.7
|
|
$
|
28.4
|
|
5.2
|
|
$
|
533.4
|
|
$
|
451.2
|
|
$
|
82.2
|
|
18.2
|
|||||||
|
Retail vehicle unit sales
|
266,050
|
|
224,034
|
|
42,016
|
|
18.8
|
|
217,685
|
|
206,456
|
|
11,229
|
|
5.4
|
|||||||||||||
|
Revenue per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
33,282
|
|
$
|
33,472
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
(0.6
|
)
|
$
|
33,570
|
|
$
|
32,303
|
|
$
|
1,267
|
|
3.9
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
2,165
|
|
$
|
2,445
|
|
$
|
(280
|
)
|
(11.5
|
)
|
$
|
2,450
|
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
12.1
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue
|
6.5
|
%
|
7.3
|
%
|
7.3
|
%
|
6.8
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2012
compared to
2011
Same store new vehicle revenue increased during 2012, as compared to 2011, as a result of an increase in same store unit volume, partially offset by a decrease in same store revenue per new vehicle retailed. The increase in same store unit volume was due to significantly improved inventory levels of vehicles produced by Japanese manufacturers, as well as to replacement demand and improved market conditions, including increased consumer borrowing and improved consumer confidence as compared to the prior year. An improved credit environment and an increase in new product offerings from automotive manufacturers also favorably impacted same store unit volume.
Same store revenue per new vehicle retailed during 2012, as compared to 2011, was adversely impacted by a shift in mix away from premium luxury and domestic vehicles to import vehicles, which have relatively lower average selling prices, primarily as a result of the improved inventory levels of vehicles produced by Japanese manufacturers as compared to the prior year. Same store revenue per new vehicle retailed was also adversely impacted by a decrease in the average selling price for import vehicles as the prior year benefited from the supply and demand imbalances resulting from the Japan supply constraints.
Same store gross profit per new vehicle retailed decreased during 2012, as compared to 2011, primarily due to the prior year benefiting from the tight supply of vehicles produced by Japanese manufacturers and by certain performance-based manufacturer incentives related to premium luxury vehicles previously sold. These incentives were $7.0 million higher during 2011 as compared to 2012.
31
2011
compared to
2010
Same store new vehicle revenue increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, as a result of an increase in same store unit volume and an increase in same store revenue per new vehicle retailed. The increase in same store unit volume was primarily due to improved market conditions, including improved credit availability offered to consumers and increased consumer demand, as well as reinstatement or expansion of certain manufacturer leasing programs. The increase in same store unit volume for 2011 was partially offset by the Japan supply constraints, which adversely impacted unit sales in the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2011, and by a decrease in manufacturer incentives.
Same store revenue per new vehicle retailed increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, primarily due to a shift in mix away from import vehicles, which have relatively lower average selling prices, toward domestic and premium luxury vehicles. Same store revenue per new vehicle retailed also benefited from an increase in the average selling prices for new vehicles in all three segments - Domestic, Import, and Premium Luxury.
Same store gross profit per new vehicle retailed benefited from a shift in mix away from import vehicles, which generate relatively lower gross profit per vehicle retailed, due to the tight supply of vehicles produced by Japanese manufacturers, as well as from an increase in new vehicle gross profit in all three segments. The increase in same store gross profit per vehicle retailed was partially offset by a decrease in certain performance-based manufacturer incentives primarily related to premium luxury vehicles previously sold as compared to the prior year. These incentives favorably impacted gross profit by $8.0 million in 2011, compared to $13.1 million in 2010. We were able to recognize these incentives due to our achievement of certain manufacturer incentive program goals during 2011 and 2010.
New Vehicle Inventories
Our new vehicle inventories were
$1.9 billion
or
55 days
supply at
December 31, 2012
, as compared to new vehicle inventories of
$1.4 billion
or
50 days
supply at
December 31, 2011
. We had
58,819
units in new vehicle inventory at
December 31, 2012
, and
43,906
units at
December 31, 2011
.
The following table details net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit, consisting of new vehicle floorplan interest expense net of floorplan assistance earned (amounts received from manufacturers specifically to support store financing of new vehicle inventory). Floorplan assistance is accounted for as a component of new vehicle gross profit.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance 2012 vs. 2011
|
2010
|
Variance 2011 vs. 2010
|
||||||||||||||
|
Floorplan assistance
|
$
|
73.5
|
|
$
|
61.1
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
$
|
55.6
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
||||
|
Floorplan interest expense (new vehicles)
|
(43.7
|
)
|
(40.3
|
)
|
(3.4
|
)
|
(40.2
|
)
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
$
|
20.8
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
||||
2012
compared to
2011
The net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit increased in
2012
, as compared to
2011
, due to an increase in floorplan assistance, partially offset by an increase in floorplan interest expense. Floorplan assistance increased due to higher new vehicle sales and an increase in the floorplan assistance rate per unit. Floorplan interest expense increased due to higher average vehicle floorplan payable balances during the year, partially offset by lower negotiated floorplan interest rates.
2011
compared to
2010
The net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit increased in
2011
, as compared to
2010
, due to an increase in floorplan assistance as a result of higher new vehicle sales and an increase in the floorplan assistance rate per unit, partially offset by an increase in floorplan interest expense primarily due to higher average vehicle floorplan payable balances during the year.
32
Used Vehicle
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions, except per vehicle data)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Reported:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retail revenue
|
$
|
3,230.4
|
|
$
|
3,047.6
|
|
$
|
182.8
|
|
6.0
|
|
$
|
2,764.8
|
|
$
|
282.8
|
|
10.2
|
||||||
|
Wholesale revenue
|
484.3
|
|
465.2
|
|
19.1
|
|
4.1
|
|
351.3
|
|
113.9
|
|
32.4
|
|||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
3,714.7
|
|
$
|
3,512.8
|
|
$
|
201.9
|
|
5.7
|
|
$
|
3,116.1
|
|
$
|
396.7
|
|
12.7
|
||||||
|
Retail gross profit
|
$
|
293.8
|
|
$
|
280.6
|
|
$
|
13.2
|
|
4.7
|
|
$
|
258.1
|
|
$
|
22.5
|
|
8.7
|
||||||
|
Wholesale gross profit
|
5.5
|
|
4.2
|
|
1.3
|
|
8.6
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total gross profit
|
$
|
299.3
|
|
$
|
284.8
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
5.1
|
|
$
|
266.7
|
|
$
|
18.1
|
|
6.8
|
||||||
|
Retail vehicle unit sales
|
180,973
|
|
171,094
|
|
9,879
|
|
5.8
|
|
160,126
|
|
10,968
|
|
6.8
|
|||||||||||
|
Revenue per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
17,850
|
|
$
|
17,812
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
0.2
|
|
$
|
17,266
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
3.2
|
||||||
|
Gross profit per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
1,623
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
1.7
|
||||||
|
Gross profit as a percentage of retail revenue
|
9.1
|
%
|
9.2
|
%
|
9.3
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Days supply (trailing calendar month days)
|
35 days
|
|
31 days
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Same Store:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retail revenue
|
$
|
3,208.9
|
|
$
|
3,047.6
|
|
$
|
161.3
|
|
5.3
|
|
$
|
2,985.6
|
|
$
|
2,764.8
|
|
$
|
220.8
|
|
8.0
|
|||||||
|
Wholesale revenue
|
473.6
|
|
465.2
|
|
8.4
|
|
1.8
|
|
429.4
|
|
351.3
|
|
78.1
|
|
22.2
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
3,682.5
|
|
$
|
3,512.8
|
|
$
|
169.7
|
|
4.8
|
|
$
|
3,415.0
|
|
$
|
3,116.1
|
|
$
|
298.9
|
|
9.6
|
|||||||
|
Retail gross profit
|
$
|
291.5
|
|
$
|
280.6
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
3.9
|
|
$
|
275.1
|
|
$
|
258.1
|
|
$
|
17.0
|
|
6.6
|
|||||||
|
Wholesale gross profit
|
5.5
|
|
4.2
|
|
1.3
|
|
4.6
|
|
8.6
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total gross profit
|
$
|
297.0
|
|
$
|
284.8
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
4.3
|
|
$
|
279.7
|
|
$
|
266.7
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
4.9
|
|||||||
|
Retail vehicle unit sales
|
179,669
|
|
171,094
|
|
8,575
|
|
5.0
|
|
167,563
|
|
160,126
|
|
7,437
|
|
4.6
|
|||||||||||||
|
Revenue per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
17,860
|
|
$
|
17,812
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
0.3
|
|
$
|
17,818
|
|
$
|
17,266
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
3.2
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
1,622
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
(1.1
|
)
|
$
|
1,642
|
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
1.9
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit as a percentage of retail revenue
|
9.1
|
%
|
9.2
|
%
|
9.2
|
%
|
9.3
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2012
compared to
2011
Same store retail used vehicle revenue increased during 2012, as compared to 2011, as a result of an increase in same store unit volume and an increase in revenue per used vehicle retailed. The increase in same store unit volume was driven in part by an increase in sales of certified pre-owned vehicles, as well as an increase in trade-in volume.
Same store revenue per used vehicle retailed during 2012 benefited from a shift in mix toward premium luxury vehicles, which have relatively higher average selling prices.
Same store gross profit per used vehicle retailed decreased during 2012, as compared to 2011, due in part to compressed margins on certified pre-owned vehicles.
33
2011
compared to
2010
Same store retail used vehicle revenue increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, as a result of both an increase in same store unit volume and an increase in revenue per used vehicle retailed. The increase in used vehicle sales volume was driven in part by an increase in sales of value-priced vehicles. We opened 19 Value Vehicle Outlets (“VVOs”) primarily in the second half of 2010 and an additional 8 in 2011 to address industry supply constraints and meet market demand. Through our VVOs, which are located on existing store facilities, we sell vehicles that we would have traditionally wholesaled with an average retail price lower than that of used vehicles we typically retail. Additionally, used vehicle sales volumes benefited from an increase in trade-in volume associated with the increase in new vehicle sales volume. These increases were partially offset by a decline in certified pre-owned vehicle sales.
Same store revenue per used vehicle retailed benefited from an increase in the average selling prices for used vehicles in the Domestic and Import segments primarily due to tighter supply, which drove up the wholesale values of used vehicles. Used vehicle supply was impacted by historically low new vehicle unit sales in recent years, and the decline in off-lease vehicles, as well as by customers retaining their vehicles for longer periods of time. The increase in same store revenue per used vehicle retailed was partially offset by a decline in revenues as a result of increased sales of value-priced vehicles, which have lower average retail prices than used vehicles we typically retail.
Same store gross profit per used vehicle retailed increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, due to modest increases in the first half of 2011, primarily due to temporarily elevated used vehicle values driven by Japanese new vehicle supply constraints. These increases were partially offset by declines in the second half of 2011 related to the liquidation of additional inventory acquired in the second quarter of 2011 when the timeline for the Japanese disruption in new vehicle inventory was anticipated to be longer. The increase in same store gross profit per used vehicle retailed was also partially offset by increased sales of value-priced vehicles, which generate a relatively lower gross profit per vehicle retailed than used vehicles we typically retail.
Used Vehicle Inventories
Used vehicle inventories were
$318.7 million
or
35 days
supply at
December 31, 2012
, compared to
$286.3 million
or
31 days
at
December 31, 2011
.
34
Parts & Service
Parts and service revenue is primarily derived from vehicle repairs paid directly by the customers or via reimbursement from manufacturers and others under warranty programs, as well as from wholesale parts and collision businesses.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Reported:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
2,399.2
|
|
$
|
2,293.1
|
|
$
|
106.1
|
|
4.6
|
$
|
2,209.1
|
|
$
|
84.0
|
|
3.8
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
1,007.9
|
|
$
|
970.1
|
|
$
|
37.8
|
|
3.9
|
$
|
963.2
|
|
$
|
6.9
|
|
0.7
|
||||||
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue
|
42.0
|
%
|
42.3
|
%
|
43.6
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
|
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2011
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Same Store:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
2,388.2
|
|
$
|
2,293.1
|
|
$
|
95.1
|
|
4.1
|
$
|
2,250.9
|
|
$
|
2,209.1
|
|
$
|
41.8
|
|
1.9
|
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
1,003.2
|
|
$
|
970.1
|
|
$
|
33.1
|
|
3.4
|
$
|
950.7
|
|
$
|
963.2
|
|
$
|
(12.5
|
)
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue
|
42.0
|
%
|
42.3
|
%
|
42.2
|
%
|
43.6
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2012
compared to
2011
Same store parts and service gross profit
increased
during
2012
, as compared to
2011
, primarily due to increases in gross profit associated with the preparation of vehicles for sale of
$25.1 million
, customer-pay service of
$7.5 million
, and collision business of
$2.7 million
, partially offset by a decline in gross profit associated with warranty of
$1.2 million
.
Gross profit associated with the preparation of vehicles for sale benefited from higher new and used vehicle sales volume. Customer-pay service gross profit benefited from improved market conditions and better marketing of products and services in the service department. Gross profit associated with our collision businesses benefited from expanded relationships with insurance providers and increased capacity at certain of our collision centers. Warranty gross profit was adversely impacted during 2012 by fewer vehicles in operation as a result of historically lower vehicle sales in recent years and, to a lesser extent, improved quality of vehicles manufactured in recent years.
2011
compared to
2010
Same store parts and service gross profit decreased during 2011, as compared to 2010, primarily due to a decline in gross profit associated with warranty of $19.5 million, partially offset by an increase in gross profit associated with customer-pay service of $6.5 million and an increase in gross profit associated with the preparation of vehicles for sale of $4.5 million.
Warranty gross profit was adversely impacted during 2011 by fewer vehicles in operation as a result of historically lower vehicle sales in recent years and, to a lesser extent, improved quality of vehicles manufactured in recent years. Additionally, in 2010, warranty gross profit benefited from an increase in warranty service related to the rise of manufacturer recalls in the automotive industry. Customer-pay service gross profit benefited from improved market conditions and better marketing of products and services in the service department. Gross profit associated with the preparation of vehicles for sale was favorably impacted by higher new and used vehicle sales volume.
35
Finance and Insurance
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions, except per vehicle data)
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Reported:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue and gross profit
|
$
|
571.2
|
|
$
|
474.5
|
|
$
|
96.7
|
|
20.4
|
$
|
418.9
|
|
$
|
55.6
|
|
13.3
|
||||||
|
Gross profit per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
6.0
|
$
|
1,143
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
5.1
|
||||||
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
|
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2011
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Same Store:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue and gross profit
|
$
|
568.1
|
|
$
|
474.5
|
|
$
|
93.6
|
|
19.7
|
$
|
463.9
|
|
$
|
418.9
|
|
$
|
45.0
|
|
10.7
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit per vehicle retailed
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
6.2
|
$
|
1,204
|
|
$
|
1,143
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
5.3
|
|||||||
2012
compared to
2011
Same store finance and insurance revenue and gross profit increased during 2012, as compared to 2011, due to an increase in new and used vehicle sales volume and an increase in same store finance and insurance revenue and gross profit per vehicle retailed. Finance and insurance revenue and gross profit during 2012 were also impacted by a favorable adjustment of $5.1 million ($3.2 million after-tax) associated with certain product maintenance contracts. This benefit was partially offset by a decrease in retrospective commissions.
Same store finance and insurance revenue and gross profit per vehicle retailed benefited from an increase in margin on product contracts sold, an increase in product penetration, more customers financing vehicles through our stores, and an increase in amounts financed per transaction.
2011
compared to
2010
Same store finance and insurance revenue and gross profit increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, primarily due to an increase in new and used vehicle sales volume and an increase in same store finance and insurance revenue and gross profit per vehicle retailed, partially offset by a decrease in same store new vehicle sales in the Import segment.
Same store finance and insurance revenue and gross profit per vehicle retailed increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, due to an increase in revenue associated with arranging customer financing, an increase in margin on product contracts sold, more customers financing vehicles through our stores, and an increase in amounts financed per transaction. This benefit was partially offset by a decline in profit resulting from chargeback experience.
36
Segment Results
In the following table of financial data, total segment income of the operating segments is reconciled to consolidated operating income.
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
5,131.6
|
|
$
|
4,655.4
|
|
$
|
476.2
|
|
10.2
|
$
|
4,111.3
|
|
$
|
544.1
|
|
13.2
|
||||||
|
Import
|
5,828.8
|
|
4,933.3
|
|
895.5
|
|
18.2
|
4,582.2
|
|
351.1
|
|
7.7
|
|||||||||||
|
Premium Luxury
|
4,553.3
|
|
4,096.4
|
|
456.9
|
|
11.2
|
3,635.2
|
|
461.2
|
|
12.7
|
|||||||||||
|
Total segment revenue
|
15,513.7
|
|
13,685.1
|
|
1,828.6
|
|
13.4
|
12,328.7
|
|
1,356.4
|
|
11.0
|
|||||||||||
|
Corporate and other
|
155.1
|
|
147.2
|
|
7.9
|
|
5.4
|
132.3
|
|
14.9
|
|
11.3
|
|||||||||||
|
Total consolidated revenue
|
$
|
15,668.8
|
|
$
|
13,832.3
|
|
$
|
1,836.5
|
|
13.3
|
$
|
12,461.0
|
|
$
|
1,371.3
|
|
11.0
|
||||||
|
Segment income*:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
209.4
|
|
$
|
180.0
|
|
$
|
29.4
|
|
16.3
|
$
|
152.7
|
|
$
|
27.3
|
|
17.9
|
||||||
|
Import
|
257.9
|
|
227.1
|
|
30.8
|
|
13.6
|
188.2
|
|
38.9
|
|
20.7
|
|||||||||||
|
Premium Luxury
|
270.4
|
|
244.1
|
|
26.3
|
|
10.8
|
219.7
|
|
24.4
|
|
11.1
|
|||||||||||
|
Total segment income
|
737.7
|
|
651.2
|
|
86.5
|
|
13.3
|
560.6
|
|
90.6
|
|
16.2
|
|||||||||||
|
Corporate and other
|
(137.9
|
)
|
(121.9
|
)
|
(16.0
|
)
|
(106.5
|
)
|
(15.4
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Floorplan interest expense
|
45.5
|
|
42.7
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
42.5
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Operating income
|
$
|
645.3
|
|
$
|
572.0
|
|
$
|
73.3
|
|
12.8
|
$
|
496.6
|
|
$
|
75.4
|
|
15.2
|
||||||
|
*Segment income for each of our segments is defined as operating income less floorplan interest expense.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retail new vehicle unit sales:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
85,947
|
|
76,335
|
|
9,612
|
|
12.6
|
64,317
|
|
12,018
|
|
18.7
|
|||||||||||
|
Import
|
133,938
|
|
106,175
|
|
27,763
|
|
26.1
|
106,100
|
|
75
|
|
0.1
|
|||||||||||
|
Premium Luxury
|
47,925
|
|
41,524
|
|
6,401
|
|
15.4
|
36,039
|
|
5,485
|
|
15.2
|
|||||||||||
|
267,810
|
|
224,034
|
|
43,776
|
|
19.5
|
206,456
|
|
17,578
|
|
8.5
|
||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2012, we revised the basis of segmentation of our Import and Premium Luxury segments to reclassify Audi franchises from the Import segment to the Premium Luxury segment. In connection with this change, we reclassified historical amounts to conform to our current segment presentation. We reclassified revenue of
$187.7 million
and segment income of
$13.2 million
for 2011, and revenue of
$126.2 million
and segment income of
$11.3 million
for 2010 related to the five Audi franchises we held during these periods.
37
Domestic
The Domestic segment operating results included the following:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
5,131.6
|
|
$
|
4,655.4
|
|
$
|
476.2
|
|
10.2
|
$
|
4,111.3
|
|
$
|
544.1
|
|
13.2
|
||||||
|
Segment income
|
$
|
209.4
|
|
$
|
180.0
|
|
$
|
29.4
|
|
16.3
|
$
|
152.7
|
|
$
|
27.3
|
|
17.9
|
||||||
|
Retail new vehicle unit sales
|
85,947
|
|
76,335
|
|
9,612
|
|
12.6
|
64,317
|
|
12,018
|
|
18.7
|
|||||||||||
2012
compared to
2011
Domestic revenue increased during 2012, as compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in new vehicle unit volume and an increase in revenue per new vehicle retailed. The increase in new vehicle unit volume was due in part to replacement demand and improved market conditions, including increased consumer borrowing and improved consumer confidence as compared to the prior year. An improved credit environment and an increase in new product offerings from automotive manufacturers also favorably impacted new vehicle unit volume. New vehicle revenue and unit sales increased for all three domestic manufacturers as compared to 2011.
Domestic segment income increased during 2012, as compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in finance and insurance revenue and gross profit, which benefited from higher new and used vehicle unit volume, as well as an increase in new vehicle gross profit due to higher new vehicle unit volume. Increases in Domestic segment income were partially offset by an increase in variable expenses.
2011
compared to
2010
Domestic revenue increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, due to an increase in new and used vehicle unit volume and an increase in revenue per used vehicle retailed. The increase in new vehicle unit volume was primarily due to improved market conditions, including increased consumer demand, as well as reinstatement or expansion of certain manufacturer leasing programs. New vehicle revenue and unit sales increased for all three domestic manufacturers as compared to 2010. The increases in used vehicle unit volume and revenue per used vehicle retailed were primarily due to improved market conditions. The increase in revenue per used vehicle retailed was partially offset by a decline in revenues as a result of increased sales of value-priced vehicles, which have lower average retail prices than used vehicles we typically retail.
Domestic segment income increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, primarily due to an increase in new and used vehicle unit volume. Domestic segment income also benefited from an increase in finance and insurance revenue and gross profit. Increases in Domestic segment income were partially offset by an increase in volume-related expenses.
38
Import
The Import segment operating results included the following:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
5,828.8
|
|
$
|
4,933.3
|
|
$
|
895.5
|
|
18.2
|
$
|
4,582.2
|
|
$
|
351.1
|
|
7.7
|
||||||
|
Segment income
|
$
|
257.9
|
|
$
|
227.1
|
|
$
|
30.8
|
|
13.6
|
$
|
188.2
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
20.7
|
||||||
|
Retail new vehicle unit sales
|
133,938
|
|
106,175
|
|
27,763
|
|
26.1
|
106,100
|
|
75
|
|
0.1
|
|||||||||||
2012
compared to
2011
Import revenue increased during 2012, as compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in new vehicle unit volume, partially offset by a decrease in revenue per new vehicle retailed. The increase in new vehicle unit volume was due to significantly improved inventory levels of vehicles produced by Japanese manufacturers, as well as to replacement demand and improved market conditions, including increased consumer borrowing and improved consumer confidence as compared to the prior year. An improved credit environment and an increase in new product offerings from automotive manufacturers also favorably impacted new vehicle unit volume.
Import segment income increased during 2012, as compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in finance and insurance revenue and gross profit and parts and service gross profit, both of which benefited from higher new and used vehicle unit volume, as well as an increase in new vehicle gross profit due to higher new vehicle unit volume. Increases in Import segment income were partially offset by an increase in variable expenses.
2011
compared to
2010
Import revenue increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, due to an increase in used vehicle unit volume, primarily due to the recent acquisitions we completed in the third quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, and an increase in revenue per new and used vehicle retailed. Revenue per new and used vehicle retailed benefited from an increase in the average selling prices for both new and used vehicles, due in part to the Japan supply constraints.
Import segment income increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, primarily due to the effect of the recent acquisitions noted above, as well as an increase in used vehicle unit volume and new and used vehicle gross profit due to the Japan supply constraints. Import segment income also benefited from an increase in finance and insurance revenue and gross profit. Increases in Import segment income were partially offset by an increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses primarily due to an increase in sales commissions resulting from higher new and used vehicle gross profit.
39
Premium Luxury
The Premium Luxury segment operating results included the following:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
4,553.3
|
|
$
|
4,096.4
|
|
$
|
456.9
|
|
11.2
|
$
|
3,635.2
|
|
$
|
461.2
|
|
12.7
|
||||||
|
Segment income
|
$
|
270.4
|
|
$
|
244.1
|
|
$
|
26.3
|
|
10.8
|
$
|
219.7
|
|
$
|
24.4
|
|
11.1
|
||||||
|
Retail new vehicle unit sales
|
47,925
|
|
41,524
|
|
6,401
|
|
15.4
|
36,039
|
|
5,485
|
|
15.2
|
|||||||||||
2012
compared to
2011
Premium Luxury revenue increased during 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011, primarily due to an increase in new vehicle unit volume. The increase in new vehicle unit volume was due in part to significantly improved inventory levels of vehicles produced by a Japanese manufacturer, as well as to replacement demand and improved market conditions, including increased consumer borrowing and improved consumer confidence as compared to the prior year. An improved credit environment and an increase in new product offerings from automotive manufacturers also favorably impacted new vehicle unit volume.
Premium Luxury segment income increased during 2012, as compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in finance and insurance revenue and gross profit and parts and service gross profit, both of which benefited from higher new and used vehicle unit volume, as well as an increase in new vehicle gross profit due to higher new vehicle unit volume. Increases in Premium Luxury segment income were partially offset by an increase in variable expenses. The prior year period was also more favorably impacted by a higher amount of certain performance-based manufacturer incentives as noted above in the “New Vehicle” section.
2011
compared to
2010
Premium Luxury revenue increased during 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010, primarily due to an increase in new and used vehicle unit volume and an increase in revenue per new vehicle retailed. The increases in new and used vehicle unit volume and revenue per new vehicle retailed was primarily due to improved market conditions, including increased consumer demand.
Premium Luxury segment income increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, primarily due to an increase in new vehicle unit volume and supply and demand imbalances for vehicles produced by Japanese manufacturers as a result of the Japan supply constraints. Premium Luxury segment income also benefited from an increase in finance and insurance revenue and gross profit. The increases in Premium Luxury segment income were partially offset by an increase in volume-related expenses, as well as by a decrease in certain performance-based manufacturer incentives as compared to the prior year. As noted above in the “New Vehicle” section, we achieved certain manufacturer incentive program goals during 2011 and 2010.
40
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Our Selling, General, and Administrative expenses (“SG&A”) consist primarily of compensation, including store and corporate salaries, commissions, and incentive-based compensation, as well as advertising (net of reimbursement-based manufacturer advertising rebates), and store and corporate overhead expenses, which include occupancy costs, legal, accounting, and professional services, and general corporate expenses. The following table presents the major components of our SG&A.
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
2010
|
Variance
Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
|
%
Variance
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Reported:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Compensation
|
$
|
1,162.4
|
|
$
|
1,072.0
|
|
$
|
(90.4
|
)
|
(8.4
|
)
|
$
|
1,011.9
|
|
$
|
(60.1
|
)
|
(5.9
|
)
|
||||||
|
Advertising
|
135.7
|
|
130.2
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
(4.2
|
)
|
126.2
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Store and corporate overhead
|
451.4
|
|
447.2
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
(0.9
|
)
|
414.0
|
|
(33.2
|
)
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,749.5
|
|
$
|
1,649.4
|
|
$
|
(100.1
|
)
|
(6.1
|
)
|
$
|
1,552.1
|
|
$
|
(97.3
|
)
|
(6.3
|
)
|
||||||
|
SG&A as a % of total gross profit:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Compensation
|
46.8
|
|
46.5
|
|
(30
|
)
|
bps
|
47.6
|
|
110
|
|
bps
|
|||||||||||||
|
Advertising
|
5.5
|
|
5.7
|
|
20
|
|
bps
|
5.9
|
|
20
|
|
bps
|
|||||||||||||
|
Store and corporate overhead
|
18.1
|
|
19.4
|
|
130
|
|
bps
|
19.5
|
|
10
|
|
bps
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total
|
70.4
|
|
71.6
|
|
120
|
|
bps
|
73.0
|
|
140
|
|
bps
|
|||||||||||||
2012
compared to
2011
SG&A expenses
increased
in
2012
, as compared to
2011
, due to a performance-driven
increase
in compensation expense,
an increase
in gross advertising expenditures, which was partially offset by
an increase
in advertising reimbursements from manufacturers, and
an increase
in store and corporate overhead expenses. As a percentage of total gross profit, SG&A expenses
decreased
to
70.4%
in
2012
from
71.6%
in
2011
resulting from our continued effective management of our cost structure, improved associate productivity, and improved gross profit.
2011
compared to
2010
SG&A expenses
increased
in
2011
, as compared to
2010
, primarily due to a performance-driven
increase
in compensation expense, an increase in store and corporate overhead expenses, including a $4.9 million increase associated with hail-storm related losses, and
an increase
in gross advertising expenditures, partially offset by
an increase
in advertising reimbursements from manufacturers. As a percentage of total gross profit, SG&A expenses
decreased
to
71.6%
in
2011
from
73.0%
in
2010
resulting from our continued effective management of our cost structure and improved gross profit.
Re-Branding Initiative
On January 31, 2013, we announced that we will begin marketing our Domestic and Import stores under the AutoNation retail brand. The re-branding of these stores, which previously operated under various local market retail brands, will take place throughout the first half of 2013. As part of this re-branding initiative, we expect to incur, primarily during the first half of 2013, incremental, non-recurring expenses of approximately $18 million.
41
Non-Operating Income (Expenses)
Floorplan Interest Expense
Floorplan interest expense was
$45.5 million
in
2012
,
$42.7 million
in
2011
, and
$42.5 million
in
2010
.
2012
compared to
2011
The
increase
in floorplan interest expense of
$2.8 million
in
2012
, as compared to
2011
, is primarily the result of higher average vehicle floorplan balances, partially offset by lower negotiated floorplan interest rates.
2011
compared to
2010
The
increase
in floorplan interest expense of
$0.2 million
in
2011
, as compared to
2010
, is primarily the result of higher average vehicle floorplan balances, partially offset by lower negotiated floorplan interest rates.
Other Interest Expense
Other interest expense was incurred primarily on borrowings under our term loan facility, revolving credit facility, mortgage facility, and outstanding senior unsecured notes. Other interest expense was
$86.9 million
in
2012
,
$66.0 million
in
2011
, and
$56.1 million
in
2010
.
2012
compared to
2011
The
increase
in other interest expense of
$20.9 million
in
2012
, as compared to
2011
, was primarily due to a
$17.6 million
increase resulting from the February 2012 issuance of our 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020 and a
$5.5 million
increase resulting from higher levels of debt outstanding during the year associated with our revolving credit facility and capital lease and other debt obligations. These increases were partially offset by decreases in interest expense of
$2.5 million
resulting from lower interest rates on our term loan facility,
$0.7 million
resulting from the redemption of our 7% Senior Notes due 2014, and
$0.4 million
resulting from lower levels of debt outstanding during the year associated with our mortgage facility.
2011
compared to
2010
The
increase
in other interest expense of
$9.9 million
in
2011
, as compared to
2010
, was primarily due to a $10.7 million increase in interest expense resulting from higher levels of debt outstanding during the year associated with our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018 and revolving credit facilities, and a $1.2 million increase in interest expense resulting from higher interest rates on our prior term loan facility due 2014. These increases were partially offset by a $3.7 million decrease due to lower levels of debt outstanding during the year associated with our Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2013, 7% Senior Notes due 2014, and mortgage facility.
Loss on Debt Extinguishment
We expensed
$2.2 million
pre-tax in the fourth quarter of 2011 and $19.6 million pre-tax in the second quarter of 2010 related to certain debt refinancing transactions that we completed in each respective period. These expenses included $0.4 million during 2011 and $3.5 million during 2010 for the write-off of previously deferred debt issuance costs. These expenses are recorded in Loss on Debt Extinguishment in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided based upon our anticipated underlying annual blended federal and state income tax rates, adjusted, as necessary, for any other tax matters occurring during the period. As we operate in various states, our effective tax rate is also dependent upon our geographic revenue mix.
Our effective income tax rate was
38.6%
in
2012
. See Note
11
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of our unrecognized tax benefits. We do not expect that our unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease during the twelve months beginning January 1,
2013
.
Our effective income tax rate was
38.4%
in
2011
and
38.3%
in
2010
, both of which reflect the benefit of certain favorable tax adjustments.
42
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations are related to stores that were sold or terminated, that we have entered into an agreement to sell or terminate, or for which we otherwise deem a proposed sales transaction or termination to be probable, with no material changes expected. We account for a store that either has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale as a discontinued operation if (a) the operations and cash flows of the store have been (or will be) eliminated from our ongoing operations and (b) we will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the store after the disposal transaction.
In evaluating whether a store’s cash flows will be eliminated from our ongoing operations, we consider whether we expect to continue to generate revenues or incur expenses from the sale of similar products or services to customers of the disposed store in the same geographic market. If we believe that a significant portion of the cash flows previously generated by the disposed store will migrate to our other operating stores, we will not treat the disposition as a discontinued operation.
We had a loss from discontinued operations totaling
$0.9 million
in
2012
, net of income taxes, primarily related to carrying costs for real estate we have not yet sold associated with stores that have been closed.
We had a loss from discontinued operations totaling
$2.8 million
in
2011
, net of income taxes, primarily related to carrying costs for real estate we have not yet sold associated with stores that have been closed, as well as expected losses on real estate to be sold.
We had a loss from discontinued operations totaling
$8.7 million
in
2010
, net of income taxes, primarily related to operational losses for stores that were classified as discontinued operations, as well as carrying costs for real estate not yet sold related to stores that had been closed.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We manage our liquidity to ensure access to sufficient funding at acceptable costs to fund our ongoing operating requirements and future capital expenditures while continuing to meet our financial obligations. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, funds generated through future operations, and amounts available under our revolving credit facility and secured used vehicle floorplan facilities will be sufficient to fund our working capital requirements, service our debt, pay our tax obligations and commitments and contingencies, and meet any seasonal operating requirements for the foreseeable future.
Available Liquidity Resources
We had the following sources of liquidity available for the years ended December 31,
2012
and
2011
:
|
(In millions)
|
December 31,
2012 |
|
December 31,
2011 |
||||
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
$
|
69.7
|
|
$
|
86.6
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility
(1)
|
$
|
603.5
|
|
$
|
648.5
|
|
|
|
Secured Used Floorplan Facilities
(2)
|
$
|
92.9
|
|
|
$
|
75.4
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on aggregate borrowings outstanding of
$540.0 million
and outstanding letters of credit of
$56.5 million
at
December 31, 2012
, and aggregate borrowings outstanding of
$495.0 million
and outstanding letters of credit of
$56.5 million
at
December 31, 2011
. See “Long-Term Debt – Credit Agreement” for additional information.
|
|
(2)
|
Based on the eligible used vehicle inventory that could have been pledged as collateral. See “Long-Term Debt – Vehicle Floorplan Payable” for additional information.
|
In the ordinary course of business, we are required to post performance and surety bonds, letters of credit, and/or cash deposits as financial guarantees of our performance. At
December 31, 2012
, surety bonds, letters of credit, and cash deposits totaled
$92.2 million
, including the
$56.5 million
of letters of credit outstanding under our revolving credit facility. We do not currently provide cash collateral for outstanding letters of credit.
43
In February 2012, we filed an automatic shelf registration statement with the SEC that enables us to offer for sale, from time to time and as the capital markets permit, an unspecified amount of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, subscriptions rights, depositary shares, stock purchase contracts, units, and guarantees of debt securities.
Capital Allocation
Our capital allocation strategy is focused on maximizing stockholder returns. The first priority of our capital allocation strategy is to maintain a strong balance sheet. Second, we invest capital in our business to maintain and upgrade our existing facilities and to build new facilities, as well as for other strategic and technology initiatives. Third, we deploy capital opportunistically to repurchase our common stock and/or debt or to complete dealership acquisitions. Our capital allocation decisions will be based on factors such as the expected rate of return on our investment, the market price of our common stock versus our view of its intrinsic value, the market price of our debt, the potential impact on our capital structure, our ability to complete dealership acquisitions that meet our market and vehicle brand criteria and return on investment threshold, and limitations set forth in our debt agreements.
Share Repurchases
A summary of shares repurchased under our share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors follows:
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Shares repurchased
|
16.6
|
|
17.1
|
|
26.6
|
|
|||||
|
Aggregate purchase price
|
$
|
580.6
|
|
$
|
583.4
|
|
$
|
523.7
|
|
||
|
Average purchase price per share
|
$
|
34.89
|
|
$
|
34.14
|
|
$
|
19.70
|
|
||
The decision to repurchase shares at any given point in time is based on such factors as the market price of our common stock versus our view of its intrinsic value, the potential impact on our capital structure (including compliance with our 3.75x maximum leverage ratio and other financial covenants in our debt agreements as well as our available liquidity), and the expected return on competing uses of capital such as dealership acquisitions, capital investments in our current businesses, or repurchases of our debt.
As of
December 31, 2012
,
$319.2 million
remained available for share repurchases under the program.
Senior Note Repurchases and Debt Prepayment
We may from time to time repurchase our outstanding senior unsecured notes in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. Additionally, we may in the future prepay our term loan facility or other debt. The decision to repurchase senior unsecured notes or to prepay our term loan facility or other debt is based on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors.
Capital Expenditures
The following table sets forth information regarding our capital expenditures over the past three years:
|
(In millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment, including operating lease buy-outs
(1)
|
$
|
183.6
|
|
$
|
158.1
|
|
$
|
161.8
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes accrued construction in progress and excludes property acquired under capital leases.
|
Excluding land purchased for future sites and lease buy-outs, and net of related asset sales, we anticipate that our capital expenditures, including accrued construction in progress, will be approximately
$170 million
in
2013
primarily related to our store facilities.
44
Acquisitions and Divestitures
The following table sets forth information regarding cash used in business acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and cash received from business divestitures, net of cash relinquished, over the past three years:
|
(In millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Cash received from (used in) business acquisitions, net
|
$
|
(141.6
|
)
|
$
|
(64.2
|
)
|
$
|
(73.1
|
)
|
||
|
Cash received from (used in) business divestitures, net
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
||
We purchased
six
stores and related assets during
2012
, compared to
one
in
2011
and
five
in
2010
. We acquired Boardwalk Audi, Boardwalk Porsche, Boardwalk Volkswagen, Park Cities Volkswagen, and McKinney Volkswagen in the Dallas, Texas market and Spring Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram in the Houston, Texas market on December 21, 2012. The aggregate purchase price of these acquisitions was
$203.7 million
, including
$141.6 million
paid at closing and
$62.1 million
in liabilities related to capital leases and deferred purchase price commitments.
Cash Dividends
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock during our two most recent fiscal years. We do not currently anticipate paying cash dividends for the foreseeable future.
Long-Term Debt
The following table sets forth our non-vehicle long-term debt as of December 31,
2012
and
2011
:
|
(In millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||
|
7% Senior Notes due 2014
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
6.75% Senior Notes due 2018
|
395.6
|
|
395.0
|
|
|||
|
5.5% Senior Notes due 2020
|
350.0
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Term loan facility due 2016
|
500.0
|
|
500.0
|
|
|||
|
Revolving credit facility due 2016
|
540.0
|
|
495.0
|
|
|||
|
Mortgage facility
(1)
|
203.3
|
|
211.5
|
|
|||
|
Capital leases and other debt
|
107.2
|
|
30.8
|
|
|||
|
2,096.1
|
|
1,647.0
|
|
||||
|
Less: current maturities
|
(29.8
|
)
|
(12.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
$
|
2,066.3
|
|
$
|
1,634.4
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The mortgage facility requires monthly principal and interest payments of $1.7 million based on a fixed amortization schedule with a balloon payment of $155.4 million due November 2017.
|
Senior Unsecured Notes
On February 1, 2012, we issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020. Interest is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year. At any time prior to February 1, 2015, we may redeem up to 35% of the principal amount of these notes with the net cash proceeds of one or more public equity offerings of our common stock at 105.5% of principal. These notes will mature on February 1, 2020.
On April 16, 2012, we redeemed all of our outstanding 7% Senior Notes due 2014 at 100% of principal, for which we paid $15.2 million (which included accrued and unpaid interest).
At December 31,
2012
, we had outstanding
$395.6 million
of 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018, net of debt discount. Interest is payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year. At any time prior to April 15, 2013, we may redeem up to 35% of the principal amount of these notes with the net cash proceeds of one or more public equity offerings of our common stock at 106.75% of principal. These notes will mature on April 15, 2018.
Our senior unsecured notes are guaranteed by substantially all of our subsidiaries.
45
Credit Agreement
Under our credit agreement, we have a $500.0 million term loan facility and a $1.2 billion revolving credit facility. The term loan and revolving credit facilities under the credit agreement mature on December 7, 2016. As of December 31,
2012
, we had borrowings outstanding of
$540.0 million
under the revolving credit facility. We have a
$200 million
letter of credit sublimit as part of our revolving credit facility. The amount available to be borrowed under the revolving credit facility is reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the cumulative amount of any outstanding letters of credit, which was
$56.5 million
at
December 31, 2012
, leaving an additional borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility of
$603.5 million
at December 31,
2012
.
Funds borrowed under our credit agreement may be used to repay indebtedness, finance acquisitions and for working capital, capital expenditures, share repurchases, and other general corporate purposes.
Our term loan facility provides for various interest rates generally at LIBOR plus 1.75%. Our revolving credit facility provides for a commitment fee on undrawn amounts of 0.30% and various interest rates on borrowings generally at LIBOR plus 1.75%.
The credit spread charged for both the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility is affected by our leverage ratio. For instance, an increase in our leverage ratio from greater than or equal to 2.0x but less than 3.25x to greater than or equal to 3.25x would result in a 25 basis point increase in the credit spread under both our term loan facility and revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the credit agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of our subsidiaries.
Vehicle Floorplan Payable
Vehicle floorplan payable-trade totaled
$1.8 billion
at December 31,
2012
and
$1.4 billion
at December 31,
2011
. Vehicle floorplan payable-trade reflects amounts borrowed to finance the purchase of specific new vehicle inventories with manufacturers’ captive finance subsidiaries.
Vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade totaled
$773.9 million
at December 31,
2012
, and
$536.5 million
at December 31,
2011
, and represents amounts borrowed to finance the purchase of specific new and, to a lesser extent, used vehicle inventories with non-trade lenders, as well as amounts borrowed under our secured used vehicle floorplan facilities, which are primarily collateralized by used vehicle inventories and related receivables.
At December 31,
2012
, the aggregate capacity under our used vehicle floorplan facilities was
$275.0 million
. As of that date,
$119.5 million
had been borrowed under those facilities, and the remaining borrowing capacity of
$155.5 million
was limited to
$92.9 million
based on the eligible used vehicle inventory that could have been pledged as collateral.
At December 31,
2011
, the aggregate capacity under our used vehicle floorplan facilities was
$260.0 million
. As of that date,
$112.7 million
had been borrowed under those facilities, and the remaining borrowing capacity of
$147.3 million
was limited to
$75.4 million
based on the eligible used vehicle inventory that could have been pledged as collateral.
All the vehicle floorplan facilities utilize LIBOR-based interest rates. Vehicle floorplan facilities are due on demand, but in the case of new vehicle inventories, are generally paid within several business days after the related vehicles are sold. Our manufacturer agreements generally require that the manufacturer have the ability to draft against the new vehicle floorplan facilities so the lender directly funds the manufacturer for the purchase of new vehicle inventory. Vehicle floorplan facilities are primarily collateralized by vehicle inventories and related receivables.
Other Debt
At December 31,
2012
, we had
$203.3 million
outstanding under a mortgage facility with an automotive manufacturer’s captive finance subsidiary. The mortgage facility was refinanced under a new facility in November 2007 to provide a fixed interest rate (5.864%) and provide financing secured by 10-year mortgages on certain of our store properties. The mortgage facility requires monthly principal and interest payments of
$1.7 million
based on a fixed amortization schedule with a balloon payment of
$155.4 million
due November 2017. Repayment of the mortgage facility is subject to a prepayment penalty.
46
At December 31,
2012
, we had capital lease and other debt obligations of
$107.2 million
, which are due at various dates through
2032
.
Restrictions and Covenants
Our credit agreement, the indentures for our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018 and 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020, our vehicle floorplan facilities, and our mortgage facility contain customary financial and operating covenants that place restrictions on us, including our ability to incur additional indebtedness or prepay existing indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances, to sell (or otherwise dispose of) assets, and to merge or consolidate with other entities.
Under our credit agreement we are required to remain in compliance with a maximum leverage ratio and maximum capitalization ratio. The leverage ratio is a contractually defined amount principally reflecting non-vehicle debt divided by a contractually defined measure of earnings with certain adjustments. The capitalization ratio is a contractually defined amount principally reflecting vehicle floorplan payable and non-vehicle debt divided by our total capitalization including vehicle floorplan payable. Under the credit agreement, the maximum capitalization ratio is 65.0% and the maximum leverage ratio is 3.75x. In calculating our leverage and capitalization ratios, we are not required to include letters of credit in the definition of debt (except to the extent of letters of credit in excess of $150.0 million). In addition, in calculating our capitalization ratio, we are permitted to add back to shareholders’ equity all goodwill, franchise rights, and long-lived asset impairment charges subsequent to September 30, 2011 plus
$1.52 billion
. The specific terms of these covenants can be found in our credit agreement, which we filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K on December 8, 2011.
The indentures for our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018 and 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020 contain certain limited covenants, including limitations on liens and sale and leaseback transactions, but do not contain restricted payments covenants or debt incurrence restrictions. Our mortgage facility contains covenants regarding maximum cash flow leverage and minimum interest coverage.
Our failure to comply with the covenants contained in our debt agreements could permit acceleration of all of our indebtedness. Our debt agreements have cross-default provisions that trigger a default in the event of an uncured default under other material indebtedness of AutoNation.
As of December 31,
2012
, we were in compliance with the requirements of the financial covenants under our debt agreements. Under the terms of our credit agreement, at December 31,
2012
, our leverage ratio and capitalization ratio were as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
||
|
|
Requirement
|
|
Actual
|
|
Leverage ratio
|
< 3.75x
|
|
2.82x
|
|
Capitalization ratio
|
< 65.0%
|
|
59.1%
|
Both the leverage ratio and the capitalization ratio limit our ability to incur additional non-vehicle debt. The capitalization ratio also limits our ability to incur additional vehicle floorplan indebtedness.
In the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings, none of the covenants described above would be impacted. In addition, availability under the credit agreement described above would not be impacted should a downgrade in the senior unsecured debt credit ratings occur.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes the changes in our cash provided by (used in) operating, investing, and financing activities:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
316.6
|
|
$
|
376.4
|
|
$
|
251.8
|
|
||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
$
|
(297.8
|
)
|
$
|
(206.2
|
)
|
$
|
(200.2
|
)
|
||
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
$
|
(35.7
|
)
|
$
|
(178.7
|
)
|
$
|
(130.0
|
)
|
||
47
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our primary sources of operating cash flows are collections from contracts-in-transit and customers following the sale of vehicles and proceeds from vehicle floorplan payable-trade. Our primary uses of cash from operating activities are repayments of vehicle floorplan payable-trade, personnel-related expenditures, and payments related to taxes and leased properties.
2012
compared to
2011
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased during
2012
, as compared to
2011
, primarily due to an increase in working capital requirements, partially offset by an increase in earnings.
2011
compared to
2010
During 2011, we paid $14.8 million in connection with refinancing our indebtedness. Cash flows from operating activities reflect $1.8 million of these cash payments that we charged to expense related to this refinancing transaction. In addition, we charged to expense $0.4 million of previously deferred debt issuance costs. Cash flows from financing activities, discussed below, reflect $13.0 million of debt issuance costs that are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the new credit agreement.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased during 2011, as compared to 2010, primarily due to a decrease in working capital requirements and an increase in earnings.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of cash used in capital additions, activity from business acquisitions, business divestitures, property dispositions, purchases and sales of investments, and other transactions.
We will make facility and infrastructure upgrades and improvements from time to time as we identify projects that are required to maintain our current business or that we expect to provide us with acceptable rates of return. Excluding land purchased for future sites and lease buy-outs, and net of related asset sales, we project that
2013
capital expenditures, including accrued construction in progress, will be approximately
$170 million
.
2012
compared to
2011
Net cash used in investing activities increased during 2012 as compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in cash used in business acquisitions.
2011
compared to
2010
Net cash used in investing activities increased during 2011 as compared to 2010, primarily due to a decrease in cash received from business divestitures and a decrease in proceeds from property dispositions, partially offset by a decrease in cash used in business acquisitions.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash flows from financing activities primarily include repurchases of common stock, debt activity, changes in vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade, and stock option exercises.
2012
compared to
2011
During
2012
, under our share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors, we repurchased
16.6 million
shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$580.6 million
(average purchase price per share of
$34.89
), including repurchases for which settlement occurred subsequent to
December 31, 2012
. Additionally,
46,467
shares were surrendered to AutoNation primarily to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock.
During
2011
, under our share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors, we repurchased
17.1 million
shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$583.4 million
(average purchase price per share of
$34.14
), including repurchases for which settlement occurred subsequent to December 31,
2011
. Additionally,
43,729
48
shares were surrendered to AutoNation to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock.
During
2012
, we borrowed
$1.3 billion
and repaid
$1.2 billion
under our revolving credit facility, for net
borrowings
of
$45.0 million
. During
2011
, we borrowed
$940.0 million
and repaid
$625.0 million
under our revolving credit facility, for net
borrowings
of
$315.0 million
.
On February 1, 2012, we issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020. See “Long-Term Debt - Senior Unsecured Notes” above for additional information regarding our 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020. Cash flows from financing activities in 2012 reflect cash payments of $6.0 million for debt issuance costs that are being amortized to expense over the term of the related debt.
On April 16, 2012, we redeemed all of our outstanding 7% Senior Notes due 2014 at 100% of principal, for which we paid
$14.7 million
.
During 2011, we entered into a new five-year unsecured credit agreement with a $500.0 million term loan facility and a $1.2 billion revolving credit facility. The new credit agreement replaced our prior unsecured credit agreement. The prior credit agreement was terminated concurrently with our entry into the new credit agreement, and the indebtedness outstanding under the prior credit agreement was paid off with proceeds from borrowings under the new credit agreement. Cash flows from financing activities in 2011 also reflect cash payments of $13.0 million for debt issuance costs that are being amortized to expense over the term of the new credit agreement.
Cash flows from financing activities include changes in vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade (vehicle floorplan payables with lenders other than the automotive manufacturers’ captive finance subsidiaries for that franchise) totaling net
proceeds
of
$137.5 million
during
2012
compared to net
proceeds
of
$40.1 million
in
2011
.
During
2012
, cash flows from financing activities were also impacted by
a decrease
in proceeds from the exercise of stock options and
a decrease
in the related excess tax benefit from stock-based awards as compared to
2011
.
2011
compared to
2010
Net cash used in financing activities increased during
2011
, as compared to
2010
, primarily due to the net impact of the debt activity that occurred in 2011, as noted above, and 2010, described below, as well as a decrease in net proceeds from vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade and an increase in the repurchase of shares of our common stock, partially offset by increases in revolver borrowings and proceeds from the exercise of stock options in 2011 as compared to 2010.
During 2010, we accepted for payment, and thereafter cancelled, all of our outstanding Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2013 and 88.9% of our 7% Senior Notes due 2014, representing an aggregate principal amount of $264.0 million of old notes, and closed the debt offering and issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018.
A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018 was used (1) to pay approximately $274.5 million for the old notes that were validly tendered and accepted for payment (which included accrued and unpaid interest for the old notes, as well as consent payments for those that were tendered and accepted for payment by April 13, 2010), (2) to reduce the size of our term loan facility by approximately $66.6 million (from $600.0 million to $533.4 million), (3) to pay transaction fees and expenses related to the 2010 debt offering, the tender offers, and the amendment to then existing credit agreement, and (4) for general corporate purposes. Cash flows from financing activities in 2010 also reflect cash payments of $11.9 million for debt issuance costs that are being amortized to expense over the term of the related debt arrangements.
49
Contractual Payment Obligations
The following table summarizes our payment obligations under certain contracts at December 31,
2012
:
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Total
|
Less Than 1
Year
(2013)
|
1 - 3 Years
(2014 and
2015)
|
3 - 5 Years
(2016 and
2017)
|
More Than 5
Years
(2018 and
thereafter)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Vehicle floorplan payable (Note 3)
(1)
|
$
|
2,540.2
|
|
$
|
2,540.2
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Long-term debt, including capital leases (Note 7)
(1)
|
2,096.1
|
|
29.8
|
|
53.7
|
|
1,218.7
|
|
793.9
|
|
|||||||||
|
Interest payments
(2)
|
371.0
|
|
62.8
|
|
121.7
|
|
116.3
|
|
70.2
|
|
|||||||||
|
Operating lease and other commitments (Note 8)
(3)
|
467.5
|
|
44.4
|
|
78.6
|
|
69.2
|
|
275.3
|
|
|||||||||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits, net (Note 11)
(1)
|
5.8
|
|
0.8
|
|
1.3
|
|
—
|
|
3.7
|
|
|||||||||
|
Deferred compensation obligations
(4)
|
40.6
|
|
1.4
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
39.2
|
|
|||||||||
|
Estimated liability for chargebacks (Note 19)
(5)
|
56.0
|
|
31.1
|
|
22.0
|
|
2.8
|
|
0.1
|
|
|||||||||
|
Estimated liability for self-insurance obligations
(6)
|
61.5
|
|
22.6
|
|
21.0
|
|
10.0
|
|
7.9
|
|
|||||||||
|
Purchase obligations
(7)
|
126.9
|
|
55.7
|
|
40.9
|
|
29.5
|
|
0.8
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
5,765.6
|
|
$
|
2,788.8
|
|
$
|
339.2
|
|
$
|
1,446.5
|
|
$
|
1,191.1
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
(2)
|
Primarily represents scheduled fixed interest payments on our outstanding senior unsecured notes and mortgage facility. Estimates of future interest payments for vehicle floorplan payables and other variable rate debt are excluded.
|
|
(3)
|
Amounts for operating lease commitments do not include certain operating expenses such as maintenance, insurance, and real estate taxes. In
2012
, these charges totaled approximately
$21 million
. See Note
8
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
(4)
|
Due to uncertainty regarding timing of payments expected beyond one year, long-term obligations for deferred compensation arrangements have been classified in the “More Than 5 Years” column.
|
|
(5)
|
Our estimated chargeback obligations do not have scheduled maturities, however, the timing of future payments can be estimated based on historical patterns.
|
|
(6)
|
Under our self insurance programs, we retain various levels of aggregate loss limits, per claim deductibles, and claims-handling expenses as part of our various insurance programs, including property and casualty, employee medical benefits, automobile, and workers’ compensation. These amounts are based on management estimates and actuarial calculations. Although these obligations do not have scheduled maturities, the timing of future payments is estimated based on historical patterns.
|
|
(7)
|
Primarily represents purchase orders and contracts in connection with information technology and communication systems, as well as real estate construction projects.
|
In the ordinary course of business, we are required to post performance and surety bonds, letters of credit, and/or cash deposits as financial guarantees of our performance. At December 31,
2012
, surety bonds, letters of credit, and cash deposits totaled
$92.2 million
, of which
$56.5 million
represented letters of credit. We do not currently provide cash collateral for outstanding letters of credit. We have negotiated a letter of credit sublimit as part of our revolving credit facility. The amount available to be borrowed under this revolving credit facility is reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the cumulative amount of any outstanding letters of credit.
As further discussed in Note
11
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, there are various tax matters where the ultimate resolution may result in us owing additional tax payments.
50
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31,
2012
, we did not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Forward-Looking Statements
Our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects, and the prevailing market price and performance of our common stock may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the matters discussed below. Certain statements and information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including without limitation statements regarding our expectations for the automotive retail industry and the Company, as well as other written or oral statements made from time to time by us or by our authorized executive officers on our behalf, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “goal,” “plan,” “believe,” “continue,” “may,” “will,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events, and they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are difficult to predict and may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to revise or update these statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. The risks, uncertainties, and other factors that our stockholders and prospective investors should consider include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
•
|
The automotive retail industry is sensitive to changing economic conditions and various other factors. Our business and results of operations are substantially dependent on new vehicle sales levels in the United States and in our particular geographic markets and the level of gross profit margins that we can achieve on our sales of new vehicles, all of which are very difficult to predict.
|
|
•
|
Our results of operations and financial condition have been and could continue to be adversely affected by the unfavorable economic conditions in the United States and/or Europe.
|
|
•
|
If we are not able to maintain and enhance our retail brands and reputation, or if events occur that damage our retail brands and reputation, our business and financial results may be harmed.
|
|
•
|
Our debt agreements contain certain financial ratios and other restrictions on our ability to conduct our business, and our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and operations and prevent us from fulfilling our debt service obligations.
|
|
•
|
We are dependent upon the success and continued financial viability of the vehicle manufacturers and distributors with which we hold franchises.
|
|
•
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets comprise a significant portion of our total assets. We must test our goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment at least annually, which could result in a material, non-cash write-down of goodwill or franchise rights and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and shareholders’ equity.
|
|
•
|
Our new vehicle sales are impacted by the consumer incentive and marketing programs of vehicle manufacturers.
|
|
•
|
Natural disasters and adverse weather events can disrupt our business.
|
|
•
|
We are subject to restrictions imposed by, and significant influence from, vehicle manufacturers that may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects, including our ability to acquire additional stores.
|
|
•
|
We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings, which, if the outcomes are adverse to us, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, and prospects.
|
51
|
•
|
Our operations are subject to extensive governmental laws and regulations. If we are found to be in violation of or subject to liabilities under any of these laws or regulations, or if new laws or regulations are enacted that adversely affect our operations, our business, operating results, and prospects could suffer.
|
|
•
|
We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our vehicle floorplan payables, revolving credit facility, and term loan facility that could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.
|
|
•
|
Our largest stockholders, as a result of their ownership stakes in us, have the ability to exert substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our stockholders or Board of Directors. In addition, future share repurchases and flutuations in the levels of ownership of our largest stockholders could impact the volume of trading, liquidity, and market price of our common stock.
|
|
•
|
A failure of our information systems or any security breach or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information could have a material adverse effect on our business.
|
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
Our primary market risk exposure is increasing LIBOR-based interest rates. Interest rate derivatives may be used to hedge a portion of our variable rate debt, when appropriate, based on market conditions.
We had
$2.5 billion
of variable rate vehicle floorplan payable at
December 31, 2012
, and
$1.9 billion
at
December 31, 2011
. Based on these amounts, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would result in an approximate change of
$25.4 million
in
2012
and
$19.0 million
in
2011
to our annual floorplan interest expense. Our exposure to changes in interest rates with respect to total vehicle floorplan payable is partially mitigated by manufacturers’ floorplan assistance, which in some cases is based on variable interest rates.
We had
$1.0 billion
of other variable rate debt outstanding at
December 31, 2012
and
2011
. Based on the amounts outstanding at year-end, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would result in an approximate change to annual interest expense of
$10.4 million
in
2012
and
$10.0 million
in
2011
.
Our fixed rate debt, consisting of amounts outstanding under senior unsecured notes, mortgages, and capital lease and other debt obligations, totaled
$1.1 billion
and had a fair value of
$1.1 billion
as of
December 31, 2012
, and totaled
$652.0 million
and had a fair value of
$675.6 million
as of
December 31, 2011
.
52
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Page
|
53
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
AutoNation, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AutoNation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2012
and
2011
, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2012
. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AutoNation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2012
and
2011
, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2012
, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), AutoNation, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2012
, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated
February 14, 2013
expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
February 14, 2013
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Certified Public Accountants
54
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
AutoNation, Inc.:
We have audited AutoNation, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (AutoNation, Inc.) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2012
, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). AutoNation, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, AutoNation, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2012
, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
AutoNation, Inc. acquired six stores (Boardwalk Audi, Boardwalk Porsche, Boardwalk Volkswagen, Park Cities Volkswagen, McKinney Volkswagen, and Spring Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram) on December 21, 2012, and, as permitted, management elected to exclude the six stores they acquired from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. The total assets of these six stores represented approximately 4% of AutoNation, Inc.’s total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2012. From the December 21, 2012 acquisition date to December 31, 2012, the amounts of revenue of the six stores acquired included in AutoNation, Inc.’s Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2012, were not material. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of AutoNation, Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of these six acquired stores (Boardwalk Audi, Boardwalk Porsche, Boardwalk Volkswagen, Park Cities Volkswagen, McKinney Volkswagen, and Spring Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of AutoNation, Inc. as of December 31,
2012
and
2011
, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2012
, and our report dated
February 14, 2013
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
February 14, 2013
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Certified Public Accountants
55
AUTONATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of
December 31,
(In millions, except share and per share data)
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
ASSETS
|
|||||||
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
69.7
|
|
$
|
86.6
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
698.4
|
|
587.4
|
|
|||
|
Inventory
|
2,396.9
|
|
1,809.2
|
|
|||
|
Other current assets
|
196.1
|
|
193.0
|
|
|||
|
Total Current Assets
|
3,361.1
|
|
2,676.2
|
|
|||
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
2,095.1
|
|
1,950.7
|
|
|||
|
GOODWILL, NET
|
1,237.4
|
|
1,172.2
|
|
|||
|
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
|
291.3
|
|
217.8
|
|
|||
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
218.1
|
|
181.9
|
|
|||
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
7,203.0
|
|
$
|
6,198.8
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
|
Vehicle floorplan payable - trade
|
$
|
1,766.3
|
|
$
|
1,362.3
|
|
|
|
Vehicle floorplan payable - non-trade
|
773.9
|
|
536.5
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
235.8
|
|
202.4
|
|
|||
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
29.8
|
|
12.6
|
|
|||
|
Other current liabilities
|
395.9
|
|
348.8
|
|
|||
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
3,201.7
|
|
2,462.6
|
|
|||
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT MATURITIES
|
2,066.3
|
|
1,634.4
|
|
|||
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
89.4
|
|
62.3
|
|
|||
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
157.1
|
|
144.9
|
|
|||
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8)
|
|
|
|||||
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
|
|||||||
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 1,500,000,000 shares authorized; 163,562,149 shares issued at December 31, 2012 and 2011, including shares held in treasury
|
1.6
|
|
1.6
|
|
|||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
26.6
|
|
19.6
|
|
|||
|
Retained earnings
|
2,963.0
|
|
2,646.6
|
|
|||
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 42,705,580 and 27,777,625 shares held, respectively
|
(1,302.7
|
)
|
(773.2
|
)
|
|||
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity
|
1,688.5
|
|
1,894.6
|
|
|||
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$
|
7,203.0
|
|
$
|
6,198.8
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
56
AUTONATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended
December 31,
(In millions, except per share data)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
$
|
8,906.9
|
|
$
|
7,498.9
|
|
$
|
6,669.1
|
|
||
|
Used vehicle
|
3,714.7
|
|
3,512.8
|
|
3,116.1
|
|
|||||
|
Parts and service
|
2,399.2
|
|
2,293.1
|
|
2,209.1
|
|
|||||
|
Finance and insurance, net
|
571.2
|
|
474.5
|
|
418.9
|
|
|||||
|
Other
|
76.8
|
|
53.0
|
|
47.8
|
|
|||||
|
TOTAL REVENUE
|
15,668.8
|
|
13,832.3
|
|
12,461.0
|
|
|||||
|
Cost of Sales:
|
|||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
8,327.4
|
|
6,951.2
|
|
6,217.9
|
|
|||||
|
Used vehicle
|
3,415.4
|
|
3,228.0
|
|
2,849.4
|
|
|||||
|
Parts and service
|
1,391.3
|
|
1,323.0
|
|
1,245.9
|
|
|||||
|
Other
|
48.3
|
|
26.1
|
|
20.3
|
|
|||||
|
TOTAL COST OF SALES
|
13,182.4
|
|
11,528.3
|
|
10,333.5
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Profit:
|
|||||||||||
|
New vehicle
|
579.5
|
|
547.7
|
|
451.2
|
|
|||||
|
Used vehicle
|
299.3
|
|
284.8
|
|
266.7
|
|
|||||
|
Parts and service
|
1,007.9
|
|
970.1
|
|
963.2
|
|
|||||
|
Finance and insurance
|
571.2
|
|
474.5
|
|
418.9
|
|
|||||
|
Other
|
28.5
|
|
26.9
|
|
27.5
|
|
|||||
|
TOTAL GROSS PROFIT
|
2,486.4
|
|
2,304.0
|
|
2,127.5
|
|
|||||
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
1,749.5
|
|
1,649.4
|
|
1,552.1
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
87.3
|
|
83.7
|
|
76.8
|
|
|||||
|
Franchise rights impairment
|
4.2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other expenses (income), net
|
0.1
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
2.0
|
|
|||||
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
645.3
|
|
572.0
|
|
496.6
|
|
|||||
|
Non-operating income (expense) items:
|
|||||||||||
|
Floorplan interest expense
|
(45.5
|
)
|
(42.7
|
)
|
(42.5
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other interest expense
|
(86.9
|
)
|
(66.0
|
)
|
(56.1
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss on debt extinguishment
|
—
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|||||
|
Interest income
|
0.3
|
|
0.7
|
|
1.4
|
|
|||||
|
Other income (losses), net
|
3.6
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
1.5
|
|
|||||
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
516.8
|
|
461.3
|
|
381.3
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax provision
|
199.5
|
|
177.1
|
|
146.0
|
|
|||||
|
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
317.3
|
|
284.2
|
|
235.3
|
|
|||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
(0.9
|
)
|
(2.8
|
)
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|||||
|
NET INCOME
|
$
|
316.4
|
|
$
|
281.4
|
|
$
|
226.6
|
|
||
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|||||||||||
|
Continuing operations
|
$
|
2.56
|
|
$
|
1.96
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
||
|
Discontinued operations
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
||
|
Net income
|
$
|
2.56
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
123.8
|
|
144.8
|
|
156.9
|
|
|||||
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|||||||||||
|
Continuing operations
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
||
|
Discontinued operations
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
||
|
Net income
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
125.8
|
|
147.3
|
|
158.6
|
|
|||||
|
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING, net of treasury stock
|
120.9
|
|
135.8
|
|
148.4
|
|
|||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
57
AUTONATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2012
,
2011
, and
2010
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
Common Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
193,562,149
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
$
|
480.2
|
|
$
|
2,221.0
|
|
$
|
(399.9
|
)
|
$
|
2,303.2
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
226.6
|
|
—
|
|
226.6
|
|
||||||||||
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(524.4
|
)
|
(524.4
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Treasury stock cancellation
|
(30,000,000
|
)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
(483.7
|
)
|
(82.4
|
)
|
566.4
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
15.9
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
15.9
|
|
||||||||||
|
Shares awarded under stock-based compensation plans, including excess income tax benefit of $7.7
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
—
|
|
68.0
|
|
57.6
|
|
||||||||||
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010
|
163,562,149
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
$
|
2,365.2
|
|
$
|
(289.9
|
)
|
$
|
2,078.9
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
281.4
|
|
—
|
|
281.4
|
|
||||||||||
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(584.9
|
)
|
(584.9
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
18.4
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
18.4
|
|
||||||||||
|
Shares awarded under stock-based compensation plans, including excess income tax benefit of $22.8
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
—
|
|
101.6
|
|
100.8
|
|
||||||||||
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2011
|
163,562,149
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
$
|
2,646.6
|
|
$
|
(773.2
|
)
|
$
|
1,894.6
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
316.4
|
|
—
|
|
316.4
|
|
||||||||||
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(582.3
|
)
|
(582.3
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
18.6
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
18.6
|
|
||||||||||
|
Shares awarded under stock-based compensation plans, including excess income tax benefit of $10.6
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
—
|
|
52.8
|
|
41.2
|
|
||||||||||
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2012
|
163,562,149
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
$
|
26.6
|
|
$
|
2,963.0
|
|
$
|
(1,302.7
|
)
|
$
|
1,688.5
|
|
|||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
58
AUTONATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended
December 31,
(In millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
316.4
|
|
$
|
281.4
|
|
$
|
226.6
|
|
||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
0.9
|
|
2.8
|
|
8.7
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
87.3
|
|
83.7
|
|
76.8
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and accretion of debt discounts
|
5.6
|
|
4.3
|
|
3.5
|
|
|||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
18.6
|
|
18.4
|
|
15.9
|
|
|||||
|
Franchise rights impairment
|
4.2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Non-cash impairment charges
|
0.8
|
|
2.2
|
|
3.7
|
|
|||||
|
Write-off of deferred debt issuance costs
|
—
|
|
0.4
|
|
3.5
|
|
|||||
|
Net gain on asset sales and dispositions
|
(0.3
|
)
|
(3.5
|
)
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|||||
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
26.8
|
|
31.1
|
|
12.8
|
|
|||||
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based awards
|
(10.6
|
)
|
(22.8
|
)
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other
|
(4.0
|
)
|
0.3
|
|
2.3
|
|
|||||
|
(Increase) decrease, net of effects from business combinations
and divestitures:
|
|||||||||||
|
Receivables
|
(112.0
|
)
|
(127.4
|
)
|
(55.9
|
)
|
|||||
|
Inventory
|
(474.7
|
)
|
70.1
|
|
(448.6
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other assets
|
(35.8
|
)
|
(23.6
|
)
|
28.6
|
|
|||||
|
Increase (decrease), net of effects from business combinations
and divestitures:
|
|||||||||||
|
Vehicle floorplan payable-trade, net
|
404.0
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
352.6
|
|
|||||
|
Accounts payable
|
35.1
|
|
38.4
|
|
11.8
|
|
|||||
|
Other liabilities
|
55.3
|
|
37.7
|
|
14.7
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
317.6
|
|
375.9
|
|
246.5
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations
|
(1.0
|
)
|
0.5
|
|
5.3
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
316.6
|
|
376.4
|
|
251.8
|
|
|||||
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(160.6
|
)
|
(149.1
|
)
|
(150.4
|
)
|
|||||
|
Property operating lease buy-outs
|
(16.8
|
)
|
(13.8
|
)
|
(11.4
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment
|
0.6
|
|
3.0
|
|
5.4
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from the disposal of assets held for sale
|
15.3
|
|
10.9
|
|
12.4
|
|
|||||
|
Insurance recoveries on property and equipment
|
1.0
|
|
0.1
|
|
1.8
|
|
|||||
|
Cash used in business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
(141.6
|
)
|
(64.2
|
)
|
(73.1
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cash received from business divestitures, net of cash relinquished
|
6.8
|
|
4.9
|
|
13.0
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from the sales of restricted investments
|
0.4
|
|
—
|
|
1.3
|
|
|||||
|
Other
|
(2.9
|
)
|
2.0
|
|
1.0
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
(297.8
|
)
|
(206.2
|
)
|
(200.0
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(297.8
|
)
|
(206.2
|
)
|
(200.2
|
)
|
|||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
59
AUTONATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended
December 31,
(In millions)
(Continued)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
(575.6
|
)
|
(579.8
|
)
|
(524.4
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020
|
350.0
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
394.0
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from term loan facility
|
—
|
|
500.0
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Payment of term loan facility
|
—
|
|
(533.4
|
)
|
(66.6
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payment of Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2013
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(146.1
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payment of 7% Senior Notes due 2014
|
(14.7
|
)
|
—
|
|
(117.9
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facilities
|
1,280.0
|
|
940.0
|
|
305.0
|
|
|||||
|
Payments of revolving credit facilities
|
(1,235.0
|
)
|
(625.0
|
)
|
(125.0
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
(6.0
|
)
|
(13.0
|
)
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net proceeds from vehicle floorplan payable - non-trade
|
137.5
|
|
40.1
|
|
117.0
|
|
|||||
|
Payments of mortgage facilities
|
(8.1
|
)
|
(7.7
|
)
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payments of capital leases
|
(5.0
|
)
|
(0.7
|
)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
30.6
|
|
78.0
|
|
49.9
|
|
|||||
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based awards
|
10.6
|
|
22.8
|
|
7.7
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
(35.7
|
)
|
(178.7
|
)
|
(125.9
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(35.7
|
)
|
(178.7
|
)
|
(130.0
|
)
|
|||||
|
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(16.9
|
)
|
(8.5
|
)
|
(78.4
|
)
|
|||||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS at beginning of period
|
86.6
|
|
95.1
|
|
173.5
|
|
|||||
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS at end of period
|
$
|
69.7
|
|
$
|
86.6
|
|
$
|
95.1
|
|
||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
60
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in millions, except per share data)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization and Business
AutoNation, Inc., through its subsidiaries, is the largest automotive retailer in the United States. As of
December 31, 2012
, we owned and operated
265
new vehicle franchises from
221
stores located in the United States, predominantly in major metropolitan markets in the Sunbelt region. Our stores, which we believe include some of the most recognizable and well known in our key markets, sell
32
different new vehicle brands. The core brands of new vehicles that we sell, representing approximately
95%
of the new vehicles that we sold in
2012
, are manufactured by
Toyota, Ford, Honda, Nissan, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Chrysler, and Volkswagen
.
We offer a diversified range of automotive products and services, including new vehicles, used vehicles, “parts and service,” which includes automotive repair and maintenance services as well as wholesale parts and collision businesses, and automotive “finance and insurance” products, which includes the arranging of financing for vehicle purchases through third-party finance sources. For convenience, the terms “AutoNation,” “Company,” and “we” are used to refer collectively to AutoNation, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise required by the context. Our dealership operations are conducted by our subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of AutoNation, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All of our automotive dealership subsidiaries are indirectly wholly owned by the parent company, AutoNation, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable. However, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ materially from these estimates. We periodically evaluate estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements and make changes on a prospective basis when adjustments are necessary. Significant estimates made by AutoNation in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include certain assumptions related to goodwill, intangible assets, long-lived assets, and assets held for sale, accruals for chargebacks against revenue recognized from the sale of finance and insurance products, accruals related to self-insurance programs, certain legal proceedings, estimated tax liabilities, estimated losses from disposals of discontinued operations, and certain assumptions related to stock-based compensation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less as of the date of purchase to be cash equivalents unless the investments are legally or contractually restricted for more than three months. Under our cash management system, outstanding checks that are in excess of the cash balances at certain banks are included in Accounts Payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and changes in these amounts are reflected in operating cash flows in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Inventory
Inventory consists primarily of new and used vehicles held for sale, valued at the lower of cost or market using the specific identification method. Cost includes acquisition, reconditioning, dealer installed accessories, and transportation expenses. Additionally, we receive floorplan interest assistance from certain manufacturers. This assistance is reflected as a
61
reduction to the inventory cost and as a reduction to cost of sales as the vehicles are sold. At
December 31, 2012
and
2011
, inventory cost had been reduced by
$15.8 million
and
$11.8 million
, respectively, for interest assistance received from manufacturers. Parts, accessories, and other inventory are valued at the lower of acquisition cost (first-in, first-out) or market. See Note
3
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information about our inventory.
Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized, while minor replacements, maintenance, and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Leased property meeting certain criteria is capitalized and the present value of the related lease payments is recorded as a liability and included in current and/or long-term debt based on the lease term. When property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in Other Expenses (Income), Net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note
4
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed information about our property and equipment.
Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets involved using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements and capitalized lease assets are amortized to depreciation expense over the estimated useful life of the asset or the respective lease term used in determining lease classification, whichever is shorter. The range of estimated useful lives is as follows:
|
Buildings and improvements
|
5
to
40
years
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
3
to
12
years
|
We continually evaluate property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, to determine whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life or whether the remaining balance should be evaluated for possible impairment. We use an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the property and equipment in assessing whether an asset has been impaired. We measure impairment losses based upon the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value. See Note
17
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information about our fair value measurements.
During 2012, we fully impaired certain long-lived assets held and used in continuing operations and recorded a non-cash impairment charge of
$0.8 million
. During 2011, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of
$1.1 million
related to a valuation adjustment for the cumulative depreciation not recorded during the held for sale period for continuing operations assets that were reclassified from held for sale to held and used during 2011. These charges are recorded as a component of Other Expenses (Income), Net in the Consolidated Statements of Income and are reported in the “Corporate and other” category of our segment information.
When property and equipment is identified as held for sale, we reclassify the held for sale assets to Other Current Assets and cease recording depreciation. Assets held for sale in both continuing operations and discontinued operations are reported in the “Corporate and other” category of our segment information.
We had assets held for sale of
$70.4 million
at December 31,
2012
, and
$70.1 million
at December 31,
2011
, included in continuing operations. During 2012, we recorded
no
impairment charges related to our continuing operations assets held for sale. During 2011, we recorded
$1.1 million
of non-cash net impairment charges related to our continuing operations assets held for sale to reduce the carrying value of these assets to fair value less cost to sell. These charges are recorded as a component of Other Expenses (Income), Net in the Consolidated Statements of Income and are reported in the “Corporate and other” category of our segment information.
We had assets held for sale of
$43.2 million
at December 31,
2012
, and
$49.5 million
at December 31,
2011
, included in discontinued operations. We recorded
$0.1 million
during
2012
and
$0.5 million
during
2011
of non-cash impairment charges related to our discontinued operations assets held for sale to reduce the carrying value of these assets to fair value less cost to sell. These charges are recorded as a component of Loss from Discontinued Operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
62
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net
Goodwill consists of the cost of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired. Additionally, other intangible assets are separately recognized if the benefit of the intangible asset is obtained through contractual or other legal rights, or if the intangible asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, regardless of our intent to do so.
Our principal identifiable intangible assets are rights under franchise agreements with vehicle manufacturers. We generally expect our franchise agreements to survive for the foreseeable future and, when the agreements do not have indefinite terms, anticipate routine renewals of the agreements without substantial cost. The contractual terms of our franchise agreements provide for various durations, ranging from
one
year to no expiration date, and in certain cases, manufacturers have undertaken to renew such franchises upon expiration so long as the dealership is in compliance with the terms of the agreement. However, in general, the states in which we operate have automotive dealership franchise laws that provide that, notwithstanding the terms of any franchise agreement, it is unlawful for a manufacturer to terminate or not renew a franchise unless “good cause” exists. It is generally difficult, outside of bankruptcy, for a manufacturer to terminate or not renew a franchise under these franchise laws, which were designed to protect dealers. In addition, in our experience and historically in the automotive retail industry, dealership franchise agreements are rarely involuntarily terminated or not renewed by the manufacturer outside of bankruptcy. Accordingly, we believe that our franchise agreements will contribute to cash flows for the foreseeable future and have indefinite lives. Other intangible assets are amortized using a straight-line method over their useful lives, generally ranging from
three
to
twenty-nine
years.
Goodwill and franchise rights assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. We completed our annual impairment tests for both goodwill and franchise rights as of April 30,
2012
. Based on our qualitative assessment of potential goodwill impairment, we determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units were less than their carrying amounts and recorded
no
goodwill impairment charges during
2012
. We recorded
$4.2 million
(
$2.6 million
after-tax) of non-cash impairment charges related to rights under a Premium Luxury store’s franchise agreement as a result of the annual franchise impairment test during
2012
. The non-cash impairment charge was recorded to reduce the carrying value of the store’s franchise agreement to its estimated fair value, and is classified as Franchise Rights Impairment in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
We completed our annual impairment tests for both goodwill and franchise rights as of April 30,
2011
and
2010
, and
no
impairment charges resulted from the required impairment tests.
See Note
5
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our goodwill and other intangible assets.
Other Current Assets
Other current assets consist of various items, including, among other items, property and equipment held for sale in continuing operations and discontinued operations, current deferred tax assets, prepaid expenses, and the current portions of notes receivable and debt issuance costs.
Other Assets
Other assets consist of various items, including, among other items, service loaner and rental vehicle inventory, net, the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance held in a Rabbi Trust for deferred compensation plan participants, deferred tax assets, and the long-term portions of notes receivable and debt issuance costs. Debt issuance costs are amortized to Other Interest Expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income using the effective interest method through maturity.
63
Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities consist of various items payable within one year including, among other items, accruals for payroll and benefits, sales taxes, deferred revenue, the current portions of finance and insurance chargeback liabilities and self-insurance reserves, accrued expenses, and customer deposits.
Other Liabilities
Other liabilities consist of various items payable beyond one year including, among other items, the long-term portions of finance and insurance chargeback liabilities, self-insurance reserves, and deferred compensation obligations.
Employee Savings Plans
We offer a 401(k) plan to all of our employees and provide a matching contribution to certain employees that participate in the plan. We provided a matching contribution of
$3.5 million
in
2012
and
$2.1 million
in
2011
.
No
matching contribution was made in
2010
. Prior to January 1, 2011, participants became fully vested in the employer match immediately upon contribution. Effective January 1, 2011, employer matching contributions are subject to a
3
-year graded vesting period for employees hired subsequent to
January 1, 2011
.
We offer a deferred compensation plan (the “Plan”) to provide certain employees and non-employee directors with the opportunity to accumulate assets for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. Participants in the Plan are allowed to defer a portion of their compensation and are fully vested in their respective deferrals and earnings. Participants may choose from a variety of investment options, which determine their earnings credits. We provided a matching contribution to employee participants in the Plan of
$0.5 million
for
2012
and
$0.6 million
for
2011
.
No
matching contribution was made in
2010
. One-third of the matching contribution is vested and credited to participants on the first business day of the subsequent calendar year, and an additional one-third vests and is credited on each of the first and second anniversaries of such date. We may also make discretionary contributions, which vest
three
years after the effective date of the discretionary contribution. Participants eligible for a matching contribution under the Plan are not eligible for a matching contribution in our 401(k) plan. The balances due to participants in the Plan were
$40.6 million
as of December 31,
2012
, and
$34.1 million
as of December 31,
2011
, and are included in Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock options granted under all plans are non-qualified. Upon exercise, shares of common stock are issued from our treasury stock. Generally, employee stock options granted in 2008 and prior years have a term of
10
years from the date of grant and vested in increments of
25%
per year over a
four
-year period on the anniversary of the grant date. Employee stock option awards granted subsequent to 2008 are annual awards granted in four equal increments over the year, which in
2012
were granted on each of
March 1
,
June 1
,
September 4
, and
December 3
,
2012
, and have a term of
10
years from the first date of grant (i.e., all options granted in
2012
will expire on March 1,
2022
) and vest in equal installments over
four
years commencing on June 1 of the year following the grant date (e.g.,
25%
of each option grant made in
2012
will vest on June 1,
2013
).
Stock option awards granted to non-employee directors subsequent to 2010 are granted quarterly, which in
2012
were granted on each of
March 1
,
June 1
,
September 4
, and
December 3
,
2012
, and have a term of
10
years from the first date of grant. Stock option awards granted to non-employee directors subsequent to 2011 vest in
25%
annual increments on each June 1 of the
four
years following the grant date, or in full upon termination of Board membership if prior to June 1 of the fourth year following the grant date. Stock options granted to non-employee directors in 2011 and prior years have a term of
10
years from the date of grant and vested immediately upon grant.
We use the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine compensation expense and amortize compensation expense over the requisite service period of the grants on a straight-line basis. Certain of our equity-based compensation plans contain provisions that provide for vesting of awards upon retirement. Accordingly, the related compensation cost for
64
awards granted subsequent to our adoption on January 1, 2006, of an accounting standard for share-based payments must be recognized over the shorter of the stated vesting period or the period until employees become retirement-eligible.
Restricted stock awards are considered nonvested share awards as defined under generally accepted accounting principles and are issued from our treasury stock. Restricted stock awards granted in 2008 vested in increments of
25%
per year over a
four
-year period on the anniversary of the grant date. Restricted stock awards granted subsequent to 2008 vest in equal installments over
four
years commencing on June 1 of the year following the grant date. Compensation cost for restricted stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and is recognized over the shorter of the stated vesting period or the period until employees become retirement-eligible.
See Note
10
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our stock-based compensation arrangements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue consists of the sales of new and used vehicles, sales of parts and automotive services, commissions from finance and insurance products, and sales of other products. We recognize revenue (which excludes sales taxes) in the period in which products are sold or services are provided. The automotive services we provide include, but are not limited to, customer-paid repairs and maintenance, as well as repairs and maintenance under manufacturer warranties and extended service contracts. We recognize vehicle and finance and insurance revenue when a sales contract has been executed, the vehicle has been delivered, and payment has been received or financing has been arranged. Revenue on finance and insurance products represents commissions earned by us for: (i) loans and leases placed with financial institutions in connection with customer vehicle purchases financed, (ii) vehicle service contracts sold, and (iii) insurance and other products sold.
We sell and receive a commission, which is recognized upon sale, on the following types of products: extended service contracts, maintenance programs, guaranteed auto protection (known as “GAP,” this protection covers the shortfall between a customer’s loan balance and insurance payoff in the event of a casualty), “tire and wheel” protection, and theft protection products. The products we offer include products that are sold and administered by independent third parties, including the vehicle manufacturers’ captive finance subsidiaries. Pursuant to our arrangements with these third-party providers, we primarily sell the products on a straight commission basis; however, we may sell the product, recognize commission, and participate in future profit pursuant to retrospective commission arrangements, which are recognized as earned. Certain commissions earned from the sales of finance, insurance, and other protection products are subject to chargeback should the contracts be terminated prior to their expirations. An estimated liability for chargebacks against revenue recognized from sales of finance and insurance products is recorded in the period in which the related revenue is recognized. Our estimated liability for chargebacks is based primarily on our historical chargeback experience, and is influenced by the volume of vehicle sales in recent years and increases or decreases in early termination rates resulting from cancellation of vehicle protection products, defaults, refinancings and payoffs before maturity, and other factors. Chargeback liabilities were
$56.0 million
at December 31,
2012
, and
$46.2 million
at December 31,
2011
. See Note
19
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding chargeback liabilities.
Insurance
Under our self-insurance programs, we retain various levels of aggregate loss limits, per claim deductibles, and claims-handling expenses as part of our various insurance programs, including property and casualty, employee medical benefits, automobile, and workers’ compensation. Costs in excess of this retained risk per claim may be insured under various contracts with third-party insurance carriers. We review our claim and loss history on a periodic basis to assist in assessing our future liability. The ultimate costs of these retained insurance risks are estimated by management and by third-party actuarial evaluation of historical claims experience, adjusted for current trends and changes in claims-handling procedures. See Note
6
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on our self-insurance reserves.
65
Manufacturer Incentives and Other Rebates
We receive various incentives from manufacturers based on achieving certain objectives, such as specified sales volume targets, as well as other objectives, including maintaining standards of a particular vehicle brand, which may include but are not limited to facility image and design requirements, customer satisfaction survey results, and training standards, among others. These incentives are typically based upon units purchased or sold. These manufacturer incentives are recognized as a reduction of new vehicle cost of sales when earned, generally at the time the related vehicles are sold or upon attainment of the particular program goals, whichever is later.
We also receive manufacturer rebates and assistance for holdbacks, floorplan interest, and non-reimbursement-based advertising expenses (described below), which are reflected as a reduction in the carrying value of each vehicle purchased by us. We recognize holdbacks, floorplan interest assistance, non-reimbursement-based advertising rebates, cash incentives, and other rebates received from manufacturers that are tied to specific vehicles as a reduction to cost of sales as the related vehicles are sold.
Advertising
We generally expense the cost of advertising as incurred, net of earned manufacturer reimbursements for specific advertising costs and other discounts. Advertising expense, net of manufacturer advertising reimbursements, was
$135.7 million
in
2012
,
$130.2 million
in
2011
, and
$126.2 million
in
2010
, and is reflected as a component of Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
Manufacturer advertising rebates that are reimbursements of costs associated with specific advertising expenses are earned in accordance with the respective manufacturers’ reimbursement-based advertising assistance programs, which is typically after we have incurred the corresponding advertising expenses, and are reflected as a reduction of advertising expense. Manufacturer advertising reimbursements classified as an offset to advertising expenses were
$38.3 million
in
2012
,
$28.2 million
in
2011
, and
$24.4 million
in
2010
. All other non-reimbursement-based manufacturer advertising rebates that are not associated with specific advertising expenses are recorded as a reduction of inventory and recognized as a reduction of new vehicle cost of sales in the period the related vehicle is sold.
Parts and Service Internal Profit
Our parts and service departments provide reconditioning repair work for the majority of used vehicles acquired by our used vehicle departments and minor preparatory work for new vehicles acquired by our new vehicle departments. The parts and service departments charge the new and used vehicle departments as if they were third parties in order to account for total activity performed by that department. Revenues and costs of sales associated with the internal work performed by our parts and service departments are reflected in our parts and service results in our Consolidated Statements of Income. New and used vehicle revenues and costs of sales are reduced by the amount of the intracompany charge. As a result, the revenues and costs of sales associated with the internal work performed by our parts and service departments are eliminated in consolidation. We also maintain a reserve for internal profit on vehicles that have not been sold.
Income Taxes
We file a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred income taxes have been provided for temporary differences between the recognition of revenue and expenses for financial and income tax reporting purposes and between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. See Note
11
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information related to income taxes.
Taxes Assessed by Governmental Authorities
Taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are directly imposed on revenue transactions are excluded from revenue in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
66
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, including outstanding unvested restricted stock awards which contain rights to non-forfeitable dividends. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options. See Note
12
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the computation of earnings (loss) per share.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment
In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update that amends the accounting guidance on testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The amendments in this accounting standard update are intended to reduce complexity and costs by allowing an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired to determine whether it should perform a quantitative impairment test. The amendments also enhance the consistency of impairment testing guidance among long-lived asset categories by permitting an entity to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to calculate the asset’s fair value when testing an indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment, which is equivalent to the impairment testing requirements for other long-lived assets. The amendments in this accounting standard update are effective for interim and annual impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. We test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually on April 30 or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting standard update will have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Testing for Goodwill Impairment
In September 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that amends the accounting guidance on goodwill impairment testing. The amendments in this accounting standard update are intended to reduce complexity and costs by allowing an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of a reporting unit. The amendments also improve previous guidance by expanding upon the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider between annual impairment tests in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The amendments in this accounting standard update are effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this accounting standard update did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which requires the presentation of components of other comprehensive income with the components of net income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income that contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. This accounting standard update eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity, and is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this accounting standard update did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, as it only requires a change in the format of the presentation of comprehensive income. We did not have other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31,
2012
,
2011
, or
2010
.
Amendments to Fair Value Measurements
In May 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that amends the accounting standard on fair value measurements. The accounting standard update provides for a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure requirements between U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards. The accounting standard update changes certain fair value measurement principles, clarifies the
67
application of existing fair value measurement, and expands the fair value measurement disclosure requirements, particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments in this accounting standard update are to be applied prospectively and are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this accounting standard update did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. See Note
17
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosures related to fair value measurements.
2. RECEIVABLES, NET
The components of receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, at December 31 are as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Trade receivables
|
$
|
97.6
|
|
$
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer receivables
|
159.9
|
|
138.4
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
39.4
|
|
41.4
|
|
|||
|
296.9
|
|
274.1
|
|
||||
|
Less: Allowances
|
(3.4
|
)
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|||
|
293.5
|
|
271.1
|
|
||||
|
Contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables
|
404.9
|
|
306.1
|
|
|||
|
Income tax refundable (See Note 11)
|
—
|
|
10.2
|
|
|||
|
Receivables, net
|
$
|
698.4
|
|
$
|
587.4
|
|
|
Trade receivables represent amounts due for parts and services that have been delivered or sold, excluding amounts due from manufacturers, as well receivables from finance organizations for commissions on the sale of financing products. Manufacturer receivables represent receivables from manufacturers including amounts due for holdbacks, rebates, incentives, floorplan assistance, and warranty claims. Contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables primarily represent receivables from financial institutions for the portion of the vehicle sales price financed by our customers.
We evaluate our receivables for collectability based on the age of receivables and past collection experience.
3. INVENTORY AND VEHICLE FLOORPLAN PAYABLE
The components of inventory at December 31 are as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
New vehicles
|
$
|
1,938.0
|
|
$
|
1,397.1
|
|
|
|
Used vehicles
|
318.7
|
|
286.3
|
|
|||
|
Parts, accessories, and other
|
140.2
|
|
125.8
|
|
|||
|
Inventory
|
$
|
2,396.9
|
|
$
|
1,809.2
|
|
|
The components of vehicle floorplan payables at December 31 are as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Vehicle floorplan payable - trade
|
$
|
1,766.3
|
|
$
|
1,362.3
|
|
|
|
Vehicle floorplan payable - non-trade
|
773.9
|
|
536.5
|
|
|||
|
Vehicle floorplan payable
|
$
|
2,540.2
|
|
$
|
1,898.8
|
|
|
68
Vehicle floorplan payable-trade reflects amounts borrowed to finance the purchase of specific new vehicle inventories with the corresponding manufacturers’ captive finance subsidiaries (“trade lenders”). Vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade represents amounts borrowed to finance the purchase of specific new and, to a lesser extent, used vehicle inventories with non-trade lenders, as well as amounts borrowed under our secured used floorplan facilities, which are primarily collateralized by used vehicle inventories and related receivables. Changes in vehicle floorplan payable-trade are reported as operating cash flows and changes in vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade are reported as financing cash flows in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Our inventory costs are generally reduced by manufacturer holdbacks, incentives, and floorplan assistance, while the related vehicle floorplan payables are reflective of the gross cost of the vehicle. The vehicle floorplan payables, as shown in the above table, will generally also be higher than the inventory cost due to the timing of the sale of a vehicle and payment of the related liability.
Vehicle floorplan facilities are due on demand, but in the case of new vehicle inventories, are generally paid within several business days after the related vehicles are sold. Our manufacturer agreements generally require that the manufacturer have the ability to draft against the new vehicle floorplan facilities so the lender directly funds the manufacturer for the purchase of new vehicle inventory. Vehicle floorplan facilities are primarily collateralized by vehicle inventories and related receivables.
Our used vehicle floorplan facilities utilize LIBOR-based interest rates, which averaged
2.0%
during
2012
and
2.3%
during
2011
. At
December 31, 2012
, the aggregate capacity under our floorplan credit agreements with various lenders to finance a portion of our used vehicle inventory was
$275.0 million
, of which
$119.5 million
had been borrowed. The remaining borrowing capacity of
$155.5 million
was limited to
$92.9 million
based on the eligible used vehicle inventory that could have been pledged as collateral.
Our new vehicle floorplan facilities utilize LIBOR-based interest rates, which averaged
2.1%
during
2012
and
2.4%
during
2011
. At
December 31, 2012
, the aggregate capacity under our floorplan credit agreements with various lenders to finance our new vehicle inventory was approximately
$2.9 billion
, of which
$2.4 billion
had been borrowed.
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
A summary of property and equipment, net, at December 31 is as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
924.6
|
|
$
|
867.1
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
1,451.5
|
|
1,321.8
|
|
|||
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
545.8
|
|
518.6
|
|
|||
|
2,921.9
|
|
2,707.5
|
|
||||
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(826.8
|
)
|
(756.8
|
)
|
|||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
2,095.1
|
|
$
|
1,950.7
|
|
|
We capitalized interest in connection with various construction projects to upgrade or remodel our facilities of
$0.6 million
in
2012
,
$1.0 million
in
2011
, and
$1.2 million
in
2010
.
69
5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Goodwill and intangible assets, net, at December 31 consist of the following:
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
1,237.4
|
|
$
|
1,172.2
|
|
|
|
Franchise rights - indefinite-lived
|
$
|
285.7
|
|
$
|
212.6
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
9.9
|
|
8.4
|
|
|||
|
295.6
|
|
221.0
|
|
||||
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
(4.3
|
)
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
$
|
291.3
|
|
$
|
217.8
|
|
|
Goodwill
We test goodwill of our Domestic, Import, and Premium Luxury reporting units for impairment annually on
April 30
or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit more likely than not exceeds its fair value.
As discussed in Note 1 above, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that permits an entity to first make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it is necessary to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit under the quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test. We completed our qualitative assessment of any potential goodwill impairment as of April 30,
2012
. Based on our qualitative assessment, we determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units were less than their carrying amounts and we were therefore not required to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test for any of our reporting units.
We performed quantitative annual impairment tests as of
April 30
,
2011
and
2010
, and
no
goodwill impairment charges resulted from the required goodwill impairment tests.
The quantitative goodwill impairment test is a two-step approach. The first step of the quantitative goodwill impairment test requires a determination of whether the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, the second step is required, which involves an analysis reflecting the allocation of the fair value determined in the first step (as if it was the purchase price in a business combination). This process may result in the determination of a new amount of goodwill. If the calculated fair value of the goodwill resulting from this allocation is lower than the carrying value of the goodwill in the reporting unit, the difference is reflected as a non-cash impairment loss. The purpose of the second step is only to determine the amount of goodwill that should be recorded on the balance sheet. The recorded amounts of other items on the balance sheet are not adjusted.
In a quantitative impairment test, we estimate the fair value of our reporting units using an “income” valuation approach, which discounts projected free cash flows of the reporting unit at a computed weighted average cost of capital as the discount rate. The income valuation approach requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, which include revenue growth rates and future operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, weighted average costs of capital, and future economic and market conditions. In connection with this process, we also reconcile the estimated aggregate fair values of our reporting units to our market capitalization, including consideration of a control premium that represents the estimated amount an investor would pay for our equity securities to obtain a controlling interest. We believe that this reconciliation process is consistent with a market participant perspective. We base our cash flow forecasts on our knowledge of the automotive industry, our recent performance, our expectations of our future performance, and other assumptions we believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. We also make certain judgments and assumptions in allocating shared assets and liabilities to determine the carrying values for each of our reporting units when performing a quantitative impairment test.
70
Goodwill allocated to our reporting units and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31,
2012
and
2011
were as follows:
|
Domestic
|
Import
|
Premium
Luxury
|
Corporate
and other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill at January 1, 2011
(1) (2)
|
$
|
156.4
|
|
$
|
503.5
|
|
$
|
482.5
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,142.4
|
|
||||
|
Acquisitions and other adjustments
|
—
|
|
14.9
|
|
14.9
|
|
—
|
|
29.8
|
|
|||||||||
|
Goodwill at December 31, 2011
(1) (2)
|
156.4
|
|
518.4
|
|
497.4
|
|
—
|
|
1,172.2
|
|
|||||||||
|
Acquisitions and other adjustments
|
8.8
|
|
15.8
|
|
40.6
|
|
—
|
|
65.2
|
|
|||||||||
|
Goodwill at December 31, 2012
(1)
|
$
|
165.2
|
|
$
|
534.2
|
|
$
|
538.0
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,237.4
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
Net of accumulated impairment losses of
$1.47 billion
(
$1.25 billion
after-tax) associated with our single reporting unit (prior to September 30, 2008, our reporting unit structure was comprised of a single reporting unit) and
$140.0 million
(
$119.0 million
after-tax) associated with our Domestic reporting unit, both of which were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
(2)
Amounts include the reclassification of
$13.2 million
from the Import segment to the Premium Luxury segment in connection with the change in segment presentation for our Audi franchises. See
Note 20
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about the revision in our basis of segmentation.
Intangible Assets
Our principal identifiable intangible assets are individual store rights under franchise agreements with vehicle manufacturers, which have indefinite lives and are tested at least annually on
April 30
for impairment. Our quantitative impairment test for intangibles with indefinite lives requires the comparison of the estimated fair value of rights under franchise agreements to the carrying value by store. Fair values of rights under franchise agreements are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows of the store. We completed our annual impairment tests as of April 30,
2012
using a quantitative approach and we recorded
$4.2 million
(
$2.6 million
after-tax) of non-cash impairment charges related to rights under a Premium Luxury store’s franchise agreement. This non-cash impairment charge was recorded to reduce the carrying value of the store’s franchise agreement to its estimated fair value. The decline in the fair value of rights under this store’s franchise agreement reflects the underperformance relative to expectations of this store since our acquisition of it, as well as our expectations for the store’s future prospects. These factors resulted in a reduction in forecasted cash flows and growth rates used to estimate fair value. This non-cash impairment charge is classified as Franchise Rights Impairment in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
As of
December 31, 2012
, we had
$285.7 million
of franchise rights recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, of which
$22.8 million
was related to Domestic stores,
$78.9 million
was related to Import stores, and
$184.0 million
was related to Premium Luxury stores.
We completed our annual quantitative impairment tests as of
April 30
,
2011
and
2010
, and
no
franchise rights impairment charges resulted from the required impairment tests.
6. INSURANCE
At December 31,
2012
and
2011
, current and long-term insurance reserves were included in Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Insurance reserves - current portion
|
$
|
22.6
|
|
$
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
Insurance reserves - long-term portion
|
38.9
|
|
34.6
|
|
|||
|
Total insurance reserves
|
$
|
61.5
|
|
$
|
58.2
|
|
|
71
7. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt at December 31 consisted of the following:
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
7% Senior Notes due 2014
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
6.75% Senior Notes due 2018
|
395.6
|
|
395.0
|
|
|||
|
5.5% Senior Notes due 2020
|
350.0
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Term loan facility due 2016
|
500.0
|
|
500.0
|
|
|||
|
Revolving credit facility due 2016
|
540.0
|
|
495.0
|
|
|||
|
Mortgage facility
(1)
|
203.3
|
|
211.5
|
|
|||
|
Capital leases and other debt
|
107.2
|
|
30.8
|
|
|||
|
2,096.1
|
|
1,647.0
|
|
||||
|
Less: current maturities
|
(29.8
|
)
|
(12.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
$
|
2,066.3
|
|
$
|
1,634.4
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The mortgage facility requires monthly principal and interest payments of
$1.7 million
based on a fixed amortization schedule with a balloon payment of
$155.4 million
due November 2017.
|
At December 31,
2012
, aggregate maturities of non-vehicle long-term debt were as follows:
|
Year Ending December 31:
|
|||
|
2013
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
|
2014
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
2015
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
2016
|
1,051.8
|
|
|
|
2017
|
166.9
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
793.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,096.1
|
|
|
Senior Unsecured Notes and Credit Agreement
On February 1, 2012, we issued
$350.0 million
aggregate principal amount of
5.5%
Senior Notes due 2020. Interest is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year. At any time prior to February 1, 2015, we may redeem up to
35%
of the principal amount of these notes with the net cash proceeds of one or more public equity offerings of our common stock at
105.5%
of principal. These notes will mature on
February 1, 2020
.
On April 16, 2012, we redeemed all of our outstanding
7%
Senior Notes due 2014 at
100%
of principal, for which we paid
$15.2 million
(which included accrued and unpaid interest).
At December 31,
2012
, we had outstanding
$395.6 million
of
6.75%
Senior Notes due 2018, net of debt discount. Interest is payable on
April 15
and
October 15
of each year. At any time prior to April 15, 2013, we may redeem up to
35%
of the principal amount of these notes with the net cash proceeds of one or more public equity offerings of our common stock at
106.75%
of principal. These notes will mature on
April 15, 2018
.
Under our credit agreement, we have a
$500.0 million
term loan facility and a
$1.2 billion
revolving credit facility. The term loan and revolving credit facilities under the credit agreement mature
December 7, 2016
. As of December 31,
2012
, we had borrowings outstanding of
$540.0 million
under our revolving credit facility. We have a
$200.0 million
letter of credit sublimit as part of our revolving credit facility. The amount available to be borrowed under the revolving credit
72
facility is reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the cumulative amount of any outstanding letters of credit, which was
$56.5 million
at December 31,
2012
, leaving an additional borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility of
$603.5 million
at December 31,
2012
.
We expensed
$2.2 million
pre-tax in the fourth quarter of 2011 and
$19.6 million
pre-tax in the second quarter of 2010 related to certain debt refinancing transactions that we completed in each respective period. These expenses included
$0.4 million
during 2011 and
$3.5 million
during 2010 for the write-off of previously deferred debt issuance costs. These expenses are recorded in Loss on Debt Extinguishment in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
Our term loan facility provides for various interest rates generally at
LIBOR
plus
1.75%
. Our revolving credit facility provides for a commitment fee on undrawn amounts of
0.30%
and various interest rates on borrowings generally at
LIBOR
plus
1.75%
.
The credit spread charged for both our term loan facility and revolving credit facility is affected by our leverage ratio. For instance, an increase in our leverage ratio from greater than or equal to
2.0
x but less than
3.25
x to greater than or equal to
3.25
x would result in a 25 basis point increase in the credit spread under both our term loan facility and revolving credit facility.
Our senior unsecured notes and borrowings under our credit agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of our subsidiaries. Within the meaning of Regulation S-X, Rule 3-10, AutoNation, Inc. (the parent company) has no independent assets or operations, the guarantees of its subsidiaries are full and unconditional and joint and several, and any subsidiaries other than the guarantor subsidiaries are minor.
Other Debt
At December 31,
2012
, we had
$203.3 million
outstanding under a mortgage facility with an automotive manufacturer’s captive finance subsidiary that matures on
November 30, 2017
. The mortgage facility utilizes a fixed interest rate of
5.864%
and is secured by
10
-year mortgages on certain of our store properties. The mortgage facility requires monthly principal and interest payments of
$1.7 million
based on a fixed amortization schedule with a balloon payment of
$155.4 million
due November 2017. Repayment of the mortgage facility is subject to a prepayment penalty.
At December 31,
2012
, we had capital lease and other debt obligations of
$107.2 million
, which are due at various dates through 2032. See Note
8
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to capital lease obligations.
Restrictions and Covenants
Our credit agreement, the indentures for our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018 and 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020, our vehicle floorplan facilities, and our mortgage facility contain numerous customary financial and operating covenants that place significant restrictions on us, including our ability to incur additional indebtedness or prepay existing indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances, to sell (or otherwise dispose of) assets, and to merge or consolidate with other entities.
Under our credit agreement we are required to remain in compliance with a maximum leverage ratio and maximum capitalization ratio. The leverage ratio is a contractually defined amount principally reflecting non-vehicle debt divided by a contractually defined measure of earnings with certain adjustments. The capitalization ratio is a contractually defined amount principally reflecting vehicle floorplan payable and non-vehicle debt divided by our total capitalization including vehicle floorplan payable. Under the credit agreement, the maximum capitalization ratio is
65.0%
and the maximum leverage ratio is
3.75
x. In calculating our leverage and capitalization ratios, we are not required to include letters of credit in the definition of debt (except to the extent of letters of credit in excess of
$150.0 million
). In addition, in calculating our capitalization ratio, we are permitted to add back to shareholders’ equity all goodwill, franchise rights, and long-lived asset impairment charges subsequent to September 30, 2011 plus
$1.52 billion
.
73
The indentures for our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018 and 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020 contain certain limited covenants, including limitations on liens and sale and leaseback transactions. Our mortgage facility contains covenants regarding maximum cash flow leverage and minimum interest coverage.
Our failure to comply with the covenants contained in our debt agreements could permit acceleration of all of our indebtedness. Our debt agreements have cross-default provisions that trigger a default in the event of an uncured default under other material indebtedness of AutoNation.
Under the terms of our credit agreement, at December 31,
2012
, our leverage ratio and capitalization ratio were as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
||
|
|
Requirement
|
|
Actual
|
|
Leverage ratio
|
< 3.75x
|
|
2.82x
|
|
Capitalization ratio
|
< 65.0%
|
|
59.1%
|
Both the leverage ratio and the capitalization ratio limit our ability to incur additional non-vehicle debt. The capitalization ratio also limits our ability to incur additional vehicle floorplan indebtedness.
In the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings, none of the covenants described above would be impacted. In addition, availability under our credit agreement described above would not be impacted should a downgrade in the senior unsecured debt credit ratings occur.
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
We are involved, and will continue to be involved, in numerous legal proceedings arising out of the conduct of our business, including litigation with customers, employment-related lawsuits, class actions, purported class actions, and actions brought by governmental authorities. We establish accruals for specific legal proceedings when it is considered probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Our accruals for loss contingencies are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as additional information becomes available. We disclose the amount accrued if material or if such disclosure is necessary for our financial statements to not be misleading. If a loss is not both probable and reasonably estimable, or if an exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued, we assess whether there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss, or additional loss, may have been incurred. If there is a reasonable possibility that a loss, or additional loss, may have been incurred, we disclose the estimate of the possible loss or range of loss if it is material or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. Our evaluation of whether a loss is reasonably possible or probable is based on our assessment and consultation with legal counsel regarding the ultimate outcome of the matter.
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we believe we have adequately accrued for the potential impact of loss contingencies that are probable and reasonably estimable, and there was no indication of a reasonable possibility that a material loss, or additional material loss, may have been incurred. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Lease Commitments
We lease real property, equipment, and software under various operating leases, most of which have terms from one to twenty years. We account for leases under related accounting guidance and other authoritative literature.
Expenses under real property, equipment, and software leases were
$47.7 million
in
2012
,
$53.9 million
in
2011
, and
$55.4 million
in
2010
. The leases require payment of real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance in addition to rent. Most
74
of the leases contain renewal options, rent abatements, and rent escalation clauses. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, including any option periods, as appropriate. The same lease term is used for lease classification, the amortization period of related leasehold improvements, and the estimation of future lease commitments.
Future minimum lease obligations under non-cancelable real property, equipment, and software leases with initial terms in excess of one year at December 31,
2012
, are as follows:
|
Noncancelable Lease Commitments
|
Capital
(1) (2)
|
Operating
(1) (3)
|
|||||
|
2013
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
$
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
2014
|
23.0
|
|
41.6
|
|
|||
|
2015
|
16.4
|
|
37.0
|
|
|||
|
2016
|
3.2
|
|
35.8
|
|
|||
|
2017
|
3.2
|
|
33.4
|
|
|||
|
Thereafter
|
40.1
|
|
275.3
|
|
|||
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
$
|
110.7
|
|
$
|
467.5
|
|
|
|
Less: Amounts representing interest
|
(21.3
|
)
|
|||||
|
$
|
89.4
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Amounts for capital and operating lease commitments do not include certain operating expenses such as maintenance, insurance, and real estate taxes. In
2012
, these charges totaled approximately
$21 million
.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes capital leases of
$43.1 million
for property associated with the six stores we acquired on December 21, 2012. The interest rates on these capital leases range from
4.2%
to
4.4%
.
|
|
(3)
|
Future minimum operating lease payments do not reflect future minimum sublease income of
$6.0 million
.
|
Other Matters
AutoNation, acting through its subsidiaries, is the lessee under many real estate leases that provide for the use by our subsidiaries of their respective dealership premises. Pursuant to these leases, our subsidiaries generally agree to indemnify the lessor and other related parties from certain liabilities arising as a result of the use of the leased premises, including environmental liabilities, or a breach of the lease by the lessee. Additionally, from time to time, we enter into agreements with third parties in connection with the sale of assets or businesses in which we agree to indemnify the purchaser or related parties from certain liabilities or costs arising in connection with the assets or business. Also, in the ordinary course of business in connection with purchases or sales of goods and services, we enter into agreements that may contain indemnification provisions. In the event that an indemnification claim is asserted, our liability would be limited by the terms of the applicable agreement.
From time to time, primarily in connection with dispositions of automotive stores, our subsidiaries assign or sublet to the dealership purchaser the subsidiaries’ interests in any real property leases associated with such stores. In general, our subsidiaries retain responsibility for the performance of certain obligations under such leases to the extent that the assignee or sublessee does not perform, whether such performance is required prior to or following the assignment or subletting of the lease. Additionally, AutoNation and its subsidiaries generally remain subject to the terms of any guarantees made by us in connection with such leases. We generally have indemnification rights against the assignee or sublessee in the event of non-performance under these leases, as well as certain defenses. We presently have no reason to believe that we or our subsidiaries will be called on to perform under any such remaining assigned leases or subleases. We estimate that lessee rental payment obligations during the remaining terms of these leases with expirations ranging from
2013
to
2034
are approximately
$46 million
at
December 31, 2012
. Our exposure under these leases is difficult to estimate and there can be
75
no assurance that any performance of AutoNation or its subsidiaries required under these leases would not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and cash flows.
At
December 31, 2012
, surety bonds, letters of credit, and cash deposits totaled
$92.2 million
, of which
$56.5 million
represented letters of credit. In the ordinary course of business, we are required to post performance and surety bonds, letters of credit, and/or cash deposits as financial guarantees of our performance. We do not currently provide cash collateral for outstanding letters of credit.
In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations, including automotive, environmental, health and safety, and other laws and regulations. We do not anticipate that the costs of such compliance will have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, although such outcome is possible given the nature of our operations and the extensive legal and regulatory framework applicable to our business. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“the Dodd-Frank Act”), which was signed into law on July 21, 2010, established a new consumer financial protection agency with broad regulatory powers. Although automotive dealers are generally excluded, the Dodd-Frank Act could lead to additional, indirect regulation of automotive dealers through its regulation of automotive finance companies and other financial institutions. In addition, we expect that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was signed into law on March 23, 2010, will increase our annual employee health care costs that we fund, with the most significant increases commencing in 2014, and significantly increase our cost of compliance and compliance risk related to offering health care benefits. Further, we expect that new laws and regulations, particularly at the federal level, in other areas may be enacted, which could also materially adversely impact our business. We do not have any material known environmental commitments or contingencies.
9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
A summary of shares repurchased under our share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Shares repurchased
|
16.6
|
|
17.1
|
|
26.6
|
|
|||||
|
Aggregate purchase price
|
$
|
580.6
|
|
$
|
583.4
|
|
$
|
523.7
|
|
||
|
Average purchase price per share
|
$
|
34.89
|
|
$
|
34.14
|
|
$
|
19.70
|
|
||
As of
December 31, 2012
,
$319.2 million
remained available for share repurchases under the program.
Our Board of Directors authorized the retirement of
30 million
shares of our treasury stock in October 2010, which assumed the status of authorized but unissued shares. Upon the retirement of treasury stock, it is our policy to charge the excess of the cost of the treasury stock over its par value entirely to additional paid-in capital. Any amounts exceeding additional paid-in capital are charged to retained earnings. The retirement made in 2010 had the effect of reducing treasury stock and issued common stock, which includes treasury stock. Our common stock, additional paid-in capital, retained earnings, and treasury stock accounts were adjusted accordingly. There was no impact to shareholders’ equity or outstanding common stock.
We have
5.0 million
authorized shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01
per share,
none
of which are issued or outstanding. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue the preferred stock in one or more series and to establish the rights, preferences, and dividends.
76
A summary of shares of common stock issued in connection with the exercise of stock options follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Shares issued
|
1.7
|
|
4.4
|
|
3.1
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
$
|
32.0
|
|
$
|
78.7
|
|
$
|
49.9
|
|
||
|
Average exercise price per share
|
$
|
19.33
|
|
$
|
17.74
|
|
$
|
16.25
|
|
||
The following table presents a summary of shares of common stock issued in connection with grants of restricted stock and shares surrendered to AutoNation to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock or to pay for an option exercise (in actual number of shares):
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Shares issued
|
160,740
|
|
163,892
|
|
188,740
|
|
||
|
Shares surrendered to AutoNation to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock or to pay for an option exercise
|
81,717
|
|
59,452
|
|
36,614
|
|
||
10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The AutoNation, Inc. 2008 Equity and Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”) provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other stock-based and cash-based awards to employees. A maximum of
12.0 million
shares may be issued under the 2008 Plan, provided that no more than
2.0 million
shares may be issued pursuant to the grant of awards, other than options or stock appreciation rights, that are settled in shares. The exercise price of all stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2008 Plan, is equal to or above the closing price of our common stock on the date such awards are granted, or if the date of grant is not a trading day, on the next trading day.
The AutoNation, Inc. 2007 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (as amended, the “2007 Plan”) provides for the grant of stock options to our non-employee directors. A maximum of
2.0 million
shares may be issued under the 2007 Plan. The exercise price of all stock options granted in
2012
under the 2007 Plan is equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date such awards are granted.
Stock Options
In
2012
, the Executive Compensation Subcommittee of the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved an annual grant of
0.9 million
employee stock options for
2012
. One-fourth of each employee stock option award that was approved in
2012
was granted on each of
March 1
,
June 1
,
September 4
, and
December 3
,
2012
. Additionally, each of our non-employee directors received an automatic grant of an option to purchase
5,000
shares of our common stock on each of
March 1
,
June 1
,
September 4
, and
December 3
,
2012
. The options granted in
2012
have an exercise price equal to the closing price per share on the grant date (
$34.09
on
March 1
,
$35.00
on
June 1
,
$41.16
on
September 4
, and
$38.63
on
December 3
,
2012
).
Stock options granted under all plans are non-qualified. Upon exercise, shares of common stock are issued from our treasury stock. Generally, employee stock options granted in 2008 and prior years have a term of
10
years from the date of grant and vest in increments of
25%
per year over a
four
-year period on the anniversary of the grant date. Employee stock options granted subsequent to 2008 have a term of
10
years from the first date of grant (i.e., all employee stock options granted in
2012
will expire on March 1,
2022
) and vest in equal installments over
four
years commencing on June 1 of the year following the grant date (e.g.,
25%
of each option grant made in
2012
will vest on June 1,
2013
).
Stock option awards granted to non-employee directors subsequent to 2010 are granted quarterly, which in
2012
were granted on each of
March 1
,
June 1
,
September 4
, and
December 3
,
2012
, and have a term of
10
years from the first date of grant. Stock option awards granted to non-employee directors subsequent to 2011 vest in
25%
annual increments on each
77
June 1 of the
four
years following the grant date, or in full upon termination of Board membership if prior to June 1 of the fourth year following the grant date. Stock options granted to non-employee directors in 2011 and prior years have a term of
10
years from the date of grant and vested immediately upon grant.
We use the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine compensation expense and amortize compensation expense over the requisite service period of the grants on a straight-line basis. Certain of our equity-based compensation plans contain provisions that provide for vesting of awards upon retirement. Accordingly, the related compensation cost for awards granted subsequent to our adoption on January 1, 2006, of an accounting standard for share-based payments must be recognized over the shorter of the stated vesting period or the period until employees become retirement-eligible.
The following table summarizes the assumptions used relating to the valuation of our stock options during
2012
,
2011
, and
2010
:
|
Grant Year
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.49% - 1.40%
|
|
0.62% - 2.81%
|
|
1.18% - 3.24%
|
|
||
|
Expected dividend yield
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Expected term
|
4 - 7 years
|
|
4 - 7 years
|
|
4 - 7 years
|
|
||
|
Expected volatility
|
39% - 48%
|
|
39% - 50%
|
|
40% - 49%
|
|
||
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of the grant with a remaining term equal to the expected term used for stock options granted. The expected term of stock options granted is derived from historical data and represents the period of time that stock options are expected to be outstanding. The expected volatility is based on historical volatility, implied volatility, and other factors.
The following table summarizes stock option activity during
2012
:
|
|
Stock Options
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Shares
(in millions)
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in millions)
|
||||||||
|
Options outstanding at January 1
|
6.8
|
|
$
|
21.03
|
|
|||||||
|
Granted
(1)
|
1.1
|
|
$
|
37.22
|
|
|||||||
|
Exercised
|
(1.7
|
)
|
$
|
19.33
|
|
|||||||
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Options outstanding as of December 31
|
6.2
|
|
$
|
24.29
|
|
6.64
|
$
|
96.2
|
|
|||
|
Options exercisable at December 31
|
3.6
|
|
$
|
19.18
|
|
5.54
|
$
|
74.1
|
|
|||
|
Options exercisable at December 31 and expected to vest thereafter
|
6.2
|
|
$
|
24.19
|
|
6.61
|
$
|
96.1
|
|
|||
|
Options available for future grants at December 31
|
6.9
|
|
||||||||||
|
(1)
|
The options granted during
2012
, are primarily related to our employee and non-employee director quarterly stock option award grants in March, June, September, and December
2012
.
|
78
The weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted and total intrinsic value of stock options exercised are summarized in the following table:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted
|
$
|
15.25
|
|
$
|
15.69
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
||
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
$
|
36.2
|
|
$
|
81.0
|
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
||
Restricted Stock
In
2012
, the Executive Compensation Subcommittee of the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved a total of
0.2 million
shares of restricted stock, all of which were granted to restricted stock-eligible employees on March 1,
2012
.
Restricted stock awards are considered nonvested share awards as defined under generally accepted accounting principles and are issued from our treasury stock. Restricted stock awards granted in 2008 vested in increments of
25%
per year over a
four
-year period on the anniversary of the grant date. Restricted stock awards granted subsequent to 2008 vest in equal installments over
four
years commencing on June 1 of the year following the grant date. Compensation cost for restricted stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and is recognized over the shorter of the stated vesting period or the period until employees become retirement-eligible.
The following table summarizes information about vested and unvested restricted stock for
2012
:
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|||||
|
|
Shares
(in millions)
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
||||
|
Nonvested at January 1
|
0.4
|
|
$
|
21.17
|
|
|
|
Granted
(1)
|
0.2
|
|
$
|
34.31
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
(0.2
|
)
|
$
|
18.75
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
(0.1
|
)
|
$
|
29.47
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31
|
0.3
|
|
$
|
27.81
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The restricted stock awards granted during
2012
are primarily related to our employee annual restricted stock award grant in March
2012
.
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards granted and total fair value of restricted stock awards vested are summarized in the following table:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards granted
|
$
|
34.31
|
|
$
|
32.50
|
|
$
|
18.20
|
|
||
|
Total fair value of restricted stock awards vested
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
||
79
Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes the total stock-based compensation expense recognized in Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income and the total recognized tax benefit related thereto:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Stock options
|
$
|
14.8
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
||
|
Restricted stock
|
3.8
|
|
3.2
|
|
1.9
|
|
|||||
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
18.6
|
|
$
|
18.4
|
|
$
|
15.9
|
|
||
|
Tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
||
As of
December 31, 2012
, there was
$19.6 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements, of which
$13.5 million
relates to stock options and
$6.1 million
relates to restricted stock. These amounts are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.7
years.
We realized tax benefits related to stock options exercised and/or vesting of restricted stock of
$15.9 million
in
2012
,
$32.8 million
in
2011
, and
$10.1 million
in
2010
.
11. INCOME TAXES
The components of the income tax provision from continuing operations for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Current:
|
|||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
146.9
|
|
$
|
125.3
|
|
$
|
115.4
|
|
||
|
State
|
25.1
|
|
21.3
|
|
19.5
|
|
|||||
|
Federal and state deferred
|
27.1
|
|
31.3
|
|
13.2
|
|
|||||
|
Change in valuation allowance, net
|
0.1
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|||||
|
Adjustments and settlements
|
0.3
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income tax provision
|
$
|
199.5
|
|
$
|
177.1
|
|
$
|
146.0
|
|
||
A reconciliation of the income tax provision calculated using the statutory federal income tax rate to our income tax provision from continuing operations for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
|
2012
|
%
|
2011
|
%
|
2010
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
|
Income tax provision at statutory rate
|
$
|
180.9
|
|
35.0
|
$
|
161.4
|
|
35.0
|
|
$
|
133.4
|
|
35.0
|
|
|||||
|
Non-deductible expenses (income), net
|
(0.2
|
)
|
—
|
1.1
|
|
0.2
|
|
1.5
|
|
0.4
|
|
||||||||
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
18.8
|
|
3.6
|
16.7
|
|
3.6
|
|
13.9
|
|
3.6
|
|
||||||||
|
199.5
|
|
38.6
|
179.2
|
|
38.8
|
|
148.8
|
|
39.0
|
|
|||||||||
|
Change in valuation allowance, net
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
(0.2
|
)
|
—
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Adjustments and settlements
|
0.3
|
|
—
|
(0.6
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(2.0
|
)
|
(0.5
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Other, net
|
(0.4
|
)
|
—
|
(1.3
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(0.7
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Income tax provision
|
$
|
199.5
|
|
38.6
|
$
|
177.1
|
|
38.4
|
|
$
|
146.0
|
|
38.3
|
|
|||||
80
Deferred income tax asset and liability components at December 31 are as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|||||||
|
Inventory
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
$
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
Receivable reserves
|
4.0
|
|
4.5
|
|
|||
|
Warranty, chargeback, and self-insurance liabilities
|
42.8
|
|
38.2
|
|
|||
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
31.6
|
|
35.8
|
|
|||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
20.6
|
|
18.8
|
|
|||
|
Loss carryforwards—federal and state
|
13.8
|
|
14.3
|
|
|||
|
Other, net
|
15.4
|
|
18.0
|
|
|||
|
Total deferred income tax assets
|
148.5
|
|
140.9
|
|
|||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(6.5
|
)
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|||
|
Deferred income tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
142.0
|
|
134.4
|
|
|||
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Long-lived assets (intangible assets and property)
|
(170.1
|
)
|
(142.5
|
)
|
|||
|
Other, net
|
(16.6
|
)
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|||
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
(186.7
|
)
|
(151.9
|
)
|
|||
|
Net deferred income tax assets (liabilities)
|
$
|
(44.7
|
)
|
$
|
(17.5
|
)
|
|
We had
$44.7 million
of current deferred income tax assets and
$89.4 million
of non-current deferred income tax liabilities at
December 31, 2012
, and
$41.8 million
of current deferred income tax assets,
$3.0 million
of non-current deferred income tax assets, and
$62.3 million
of non-current deferred income tax liabilities at
December 31, 2011
. Current deferred income tax assets are classified as Other Current Assets, non-current deferred income tax assets are classified as Other Assets, and non-current deferred income tax liabilities are classified as Deferred Income Taxes in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Income taxes payable included in Other Current Liabilities totaled
$3.2 million
at December 31,
2012
. Income taxes refundable included in Receivables, net totaled
$10.2 million
at December 31,
2011
.
At December 31,
2012
, we had
$246.2 million
of gross domestic state net operating loss carryforwards and capital loss carryforwards, and
$4.9 million
of state tax credits, all of which result in a deferred tax asset of
$13.7 million
and expire from
2013
through
2033
. At December 31,
2012
, we had
$6.5 million
of valuation allowance related to these loss carryforwards. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We provide valuation allowances to offset portions of deferred tax assets due to uncertainty surrounding the future realization of such deferred tax assets. We adjust the valuation allowance in the period management determines it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will or will not be realized. Certain decreases to valuation allowances are offset against intangible assets associated with business acquisitions accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting.
We recognized net tax benefits related to the adjustment and resolution of certain income tax matters of
$1.3 million
in
2011
and
$2.7 million
in
2010
.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. As a matter of course, various taxing authorities, including the IRS, regularly audit us. These audits may result in proposed assessments where the ultimate resolution may result in our owing additional taxes. Currently,
no
tax years are under examination by the IRS and tax years from
2007
to
2010
are under examination by U.S. state jurisdictions. We believe that our tax positions comply with applicable tax law and that we have adequately provided for these matters.
81
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Balance at January 1
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
$
|
6.9
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
||
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
0.5
|
|
0.9
|
|
4.4
|
|
|||||
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Reductions for expirations of statute of limitations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Settlements
|
(0.1
|
)
|
(1.4
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Balance at December 31
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
$
|
6.9
|
|
||
We had accumulated interest and penalties associated with these unrecognized tax benefits of
$4.5 million
at December 31,
2012
,
$4.0 million
at December 31,
2011
, and
$3.7 million
at December 31,
2010
. We additionally had a deferred tax asset of
$5.5 million
at December 31,
2012
,
$5.2 million
at December 31,
2011
, and
$4.8 million
at December 31,
2010
, related to these balances. The net of the unrecognized tax benefits, associated interest, penalties, and deferred tax asset was
$5.8 million
at December 31,
2012
,
$5.2 million
at December 31,
2011
, and
$5.7 million
at December 31,
2010
, which if resolved favorably (in whole or in part) would reduce our effective tax rate. The unrecognized tax benefits, associated interest, penalties, and deferred tax asset are included as components of Other Assets and Other Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
It is our continuing policy to account for interest and penalties associated with income tax obligations as a component of income tax expense. We recognized
$0.3 million
during each of
2012
,
2011
, and
2010
(each net of tax effect), of interest and
no
penalties as part of the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
We do not expect that our unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease during the twelve months beginning January 1,
2013
.
12. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are to be included in the computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method. Our restricted stock awards are considered participating securities because they contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends. As the number of shares granted under such awards is immaterial, all earnings per share amounts reflect such shares as if they were fully vested shares and the disclosures associated with the two-class method are not presented.
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, including outstanding unvested restricted stock awards. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options.
82
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS:
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
$
|
317.3
|
|
$
|
284.2
|
|
$
|
235.3
|
|
||
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
(0.9
|
)
|
(2.8
|
)
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
316.4
|
|
$
|
281.4
|
|
$
|
226.6
|
|
||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in calculating basic EPS
|
123.8
|
|
144.8
|
|
156.9
|
|
|||||
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
2.0
|
|
2.5
|
|
1.7
|
|
|||||
|
Weighted average common shares used in calculating diluted EPS
|
125.8
|
|
147.3
|
|
158.6
|
|
|||||
|
Basic EPS amounts:
|
|||||||||||
|
Continuing operations
|
$
|
2.56
|
|
$
|
1.96
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
||
|
Discontinued operations
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
||
|
Net income
|
$
|
2.56
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
||
|
Diluted EPS amounts:
|
|||||||||||
|
Continuing operations
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
||
|
Discontinued operations
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
||
|
Net income
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
||
A summary of anti-dilutive options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share is as follows:
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||
|
Anti-dilutive options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share
|
0.9
|
|
0.4
|
|
2.9
|
|
||
13. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations are related to stores that were sold or terminated, that we have entered into an agreement to sell or terminate, or for which we otherwise deem a proposed sales transaction or termination to be probable, with no material changes expected. Generally, the sale of a store is completed within 60 to 90 days after the date of a sale agreement. We account for a store that either has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale as a discontinued operation if (a) the operations and cash flows of the store have been (or will be) eliminated from our ongoing operations and (b) we will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the store after the disposal transaction.
In evaluating whether a store’s cash flows will be eliminated from our ongoing operations, we consider whether we expect to continue to generate revenues or incur expenses from the sale of similar products or services to customers of the disposed store in the same geographic market. If we believe that a significant portion of the cash flows previously generated by the disposed store will migrate to our other operating stores, we will not treat the disposition as a discontinued operation.
We received proceeds (net of cash relinquished) of
$6.8 million
during
2012
,
$4.9 million
during
2011
, and
$13.0 million
during
2010
related to discontinued operations.
We had a loss from discontinued operations totaling
$0.9 million
in
2012
, net of income taxes, primarily related to carrying costs for real estate we have not yet sold associated with stores that have been closed.
83
We had a loss from discontinued operations totaling
$2.8 million
in
2011
, net of income taxes, primarily related to carrying costs for real estate we have not yet sold associated with stores that have been closed, as well as expected losses on real estate to be sold.
We had a loss from discontinued operations totaling
$8.7 million
in
2010
, net of income taxes, primarily related to operational losses for stores that were classified as discontinued operations, as well as carrying costs for real estate not yet sold related to stores that had been closed.
We had assets held for sale in discontinued operations of
$45.4 million
at December 31,
2012
and
$51.7 million
at December 31,
2011
, primarily related to real estate we have not yet sold associated with stores that have been closed. Assets and liabilities of discontinued operations are reported in the “Corporate and other” category of our segment information in
Note 20
below.
14. ACQUISITIONS
We purchased
six
stores and related assets during
2012
,
one
in
2011
, and
five
in
2010
. The aggregate purchase price for these stores was
$203.7 million
in
2012
,
$64.2 million
in
2011
, and
$73.1 million
in
2010
. The 2012 acquisitions were completed on December 21, 2012, when we acquired Boardwalk Audi, Boardwalk Porsche, Boardwalk Volkswagen, Park Cities Volkswagen, and McKinney Volkswagen in the Dallas, Texas market and Spring Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram in the Houston, Texas market. Acquisitions are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from the date of acquisition. The purchase price allocations for the business combinations in
2012
are tentative and subject to final adjustment.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date for the
six
stores acquired during
2012
.
|
Inventory
|
$
|
113.0
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
46.0
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
Franchise rights - indefinite-lived
|
76.8
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade
|
(99.9
|
)
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
Aggregate purchase price
|
203.7
|
|
|
|
Capital leases and other obligations
|
(62.1
|
)
|
|
|
Cash used in business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
$
|
141.6
|
|
The goodwill was assigned to the Domestic, Import, and Premium Luxury reporting units in the amounts of
$8.8 million
,
$15.8 million
, and
$40.6 million
, respectively. We anticipate that substantially all of the goodwill recorded in
2012
will be deductible for federal income tax purposes.
84
From the December 21, 2012 acquisition date to December 31, 2012, the amounts of revenue and net income from continuing operations of the six stores acquired included in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2012, were not material. Our unaudited supplemental pro forma revenue and net income from continuing operations had the acquisition date been January 1,
2011
, are as follows:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
|
Supplemental pro forma:
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
16,241.3
|
|
$
|
14,326.9
|
|
||
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
$
|
330.4
|
|
$
|
291.2
|
|
||
The unaudited supplemental pro forma revenue and net income from continuing operations are presented for informational purposes only and may not necessarily reflect the future results of operations of AutoNation or what the results of operations would have been had we owned and operated these businesses as of January 1, 2011.
15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
It is our policy that transactions with affiliated parties must be entered into in good faith on fair and reasonable terms that are no less favorable to us than those that would be available in a comparable transaction in arm’s-length dealings with an unrelated third-party.
In January 2009, our Board of Directors authorized and approved letter agreements with certain automotive manufacturers in order to, among other things, eliminate any potential adverse consequences under our framework agreements with those manufacturers in the event that ESL Investments, Inc. and certain of its investment affiliates (together, “ESL”) acquire
50%
or more of our common stock. The letter agreements with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“Honda”) and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“Toyota”) also contain governance-related and other provisions as described below. ESL is also a party to both the Honda and Toyota Agreements. Based on filings made with the SEC through February 13, 2013, ESL beneficially owned approximately
44%
of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
Under the terms of the Honda Agreement, Honda has agreed not to assert its right to purchase our Honda and Acura franchises and/or similar remedies under the manufacturer framework agreement between Honda and the Company in the event that ESL acquires
50%
or more of our common stock. ESL has agreed to vote all shares in excess of
50%
in the same proportion as all non-ESL-owned shares are voted. In addition, we have agreed to ensure that a majority of our Board is independent of both the Company and ESL under existing New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards for so long as ESL owns more than 50% of our common stock. Furthermore, the Honda Agreement provides that Honda’s consent does not apply to a “going private” transaction under Rule 13e-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Under the terms of the Toyota Agreement, Toyota has agreed not to assert its right to purchase our Toyota and Lexus franchises and/or similar remedies under the manufacturer framework agreement between Toyota and the Company in the event that ESL acquires
50%
or more of our common stock. ESL has agreed to vote all shares in excess of
50%
in the same proportion as all non-ESL-owned shares are voted. Furthermore, we have agreed that a majority of our Board will be independent from both the Company and from ESL under existing NYSE listing standards. We have also agreed not to merge, consolidate or combine with any entity owned or controlled by ESL unless Toyota consents thereto. In addition, the Toyota Agreement provides that in the event that we appoint a Chief Operating Officer who, in the good faith judgment of our Board, does not have sufficient breadth and depth of experience, a relevant, successful automotive track record, and extensive successful automotive experience, ESL shall be required to divest its shares in excess of
50%
within certain specified time periods or its voting interest will be limited, as set forth in the Toyota Agreement. The Toyota Agreement will terminate in the event that ESL’s ownership of our common stock falls to
40%
or lower. In addition, the Toyota Agreement will terminate on December 31, 2013, with respect to future stock acquisitions by ESL, provided that ESL may seek successive annual one-year extensions. The description of the Toyota Agreement set forth above reflects all amendments thereto, including the most recent extension and amendment dated as of December 12, 2012, which we filed with a Current Report on Form 8-K on December 14, 2012.
85
We have also entered into separate letter agreements with certain other manufacturers that eliminate any potential adverse consequences under our framework agreements with those manufacturers in the event that ESL acquires
50%
or more of our common stock. ESL is not a party to any of those agreements.
There were no other material transactions with related parties in the years ended December 31,
2012
,
2011
, or
2010
.
16. CASH FLOW INFORMATION
We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less as of the date of purchase to be cash equivalents unless the investments are legally or contractually restricted for more than three months. We had non-cash investing activities in 2012 related to obligations of
$62.1 million
, which were incurred related to capital leases and deferred purchase price commitments associated with our December 2012 acquisitions. We also had non-cash investing activities related to other increases in property acquired under capital leases of
$20.1 million
during
2012
,
$24.2 million
during
2011
, and
none
during
2010
. The effect of non-cash transactions is excluded from the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
We made interest payments of
$119.6 million
in
2012
,
$103.6 million
in
2011
, and
$86.6 million
in
2010
including interest on vehicle inventory financing. We made income tax payments, net of income tax refunds, of
$147.0 million
in
2012
,
$121.1 million
in
2011
, and
$84.2 million
in
2010
.
17. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The fair value of a financial instrument represents the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and therefore cannot be determined with precision. The assumptions used have a significant effect on the estimated amounts reported.
Accounting standards define fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value and also establishes the following three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
Level 1
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
|
|
Level 2
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted market prices in markets that are not active; or model-derived valuations or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities
|
|
Level 3
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by us in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
|
•
|
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, vehicle floorplan payable, accounts payable, other current liabilities, and variable rate debt:
The amounts reported in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate fair value due to their short-term nature or the existence of variable interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates.
|
|
•
|
Fixed rate debt:
Our fixed rate debt consists primarily of amounts outstanding under our senior unsecured notes and mortgages. We estimate the fair value of our senior unsecured notes using quoted prices for the identical liability (Level 1). We estimate the fair value of our mortgages using a present value technique based on our
|
86
current market interest rates for similar types of financial instruments (Level 2). A summary of the aggregate carrying values and fair values of our fixed rate debt is as follows:
|
December 31, 2012
|
December 31, 2011
|
||||||
|
Carrying value
|
$
|
1,056.1
|
|
$
|
652.0
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
$
|
1,138.0
|
|
$
|
675.6
|
|
|
Nonfinancial assets such as goodwill, other intangible assets, and long-lived assets held and used are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when impairment is recognized or for a business combination. The fair values less costs to sell of long-lived assets or disposal groups held for sale are assessed each reporting period they remain classified as held for sale. Subsequent changes in the held for sale long-lived asset’s or disposal group’s fair value less cost to sell (increase or decrease) are reported as an adjustment to its carrying amount, except that the adjusted carrying amount cannot exceed the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or disposal group at the time it was initially classified as held for sale.
The following table presents nonfinancial assets measured and recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the years ended
December 31, 2012
and
2011
:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Description
|
Fair Value
Measurements Using
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
Fair Value
Measurements Using
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
||||||||||||
|
Franchise rights
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(4.2
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Long-lived assets held and used
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
$
|
15.8
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
||||
|
Long-lived assets held for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Continuing operations
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
||||
|
Discontinued operations
|
3.7
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
10.9
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Total long-lived assets held for sale
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
||||
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Under accounting standards, we chose to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it was necessary to calculate the fair values of our reporting units under the two-step goodwill impairment test. We completed our qualitative assessment of potential goodwill impairment as of
April 30
, 2012, and we determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units were less than their carrying amounts. Accordingly,
no
impairment charges were recorded for the carrying value of goodwill during 2012. We performed a quantitative goodwill impairment test as of
April 30
, 2011, and
no
impairment charges were recorded for the carrying value of goodwill as a result of this test.
Our principal identifiable intangible assets are individual store rights under franchise agreements with vehicle manufacturers, which have indefinite lives and are tested for impairment annually as of
April 30
or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. The impairment test for intangibles with indefinite lives requires the comparison of estimated fair value to its carrying value by store. Fair values of rights under franchise agreements are estimated using Level 3 inputs by discounting expected future cash flows of the store. The forecasted cash flows contain inherent uncertainties, including significant estimates and assumptions related to growth rates, margins, working capital requirements, capital expenditures, and cost of capital, for which we utilize certain market
87
participant-based assumptions, using third-party industry projections, economic projections, and other marketplace data we believe to be reasonable. The development of the assumptions used in our annual impairment test is coordinated by our financial planning and analysis group, and the assumptions are reviewed by management.
During
2012
, we recorded
$4.2 million
of non-cash impairment charges related to rights under a Premium Luxury store’s franchise agreement. The non-cash impairment charge was recorded to reduce the carrying value of the store’s franchise agreement to its fair value, and is classified as Franchise Rights Impairment in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. We recorded
no
impairment charges related to franchise rights during
2011
.
Long-Lived Assets
The fair value measurement valuation process for our long-lived assets is established by our corporate real estate services group, which reports to the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer. Fair value measurements, which are based on Level 3 inputs, and changes in fair value measurements are reviewed and assessed each quarter for properties classified as held for sale, or when an indicator of impairment exists for properties classified as held and used, by the corporate real estate services group. Our corporate real estate services group utilizes its knowledge of the automotive industry and historical experience in real estate markets and transactions in establishing the valuation process, which is generally based on a combination of the market and replacement cost approaches.
In a market approach, the corporate real estate services group uses transaction prices for comparable properties that have recently been sold. These transaction prices are adjusted for factors related to a specific property. The corporate real estate services group also evaluates changes in local real estate markets, and/or recent market interest or negotiations related to a specific property. In a replacement cost approach, the cost to replace a specific long-lived asset is considered, which is adjusted for depreciation from physical deterioration, as well as functional and economic obsolescence, if present and measurable.
To validate the fair values determined under the valuation process noted above, our corporate real estate services group also obtains independent third-party appraisals for our properties and/or third-party brokers’ opinions of value, which are generally developed using the same valuation approaches described above, and evaluates any recent negotiations or discussions with third-party real estate brokers related to a specific long-lived asset or market.
Long-lived Assets Held and Used in Continuing Operations
During
2012
, we fully impaired certain long-lived assets held and used in continuing operations and recorded a non-cash impairment charge of
$0.8 million
.
During
2011
, long-lived assets held and used in continuing operations with a carrying amount of
$16.9 million
were written down to
$15.8 million
to reflect a valuation adjustment for the cumulative depreciation not recorded during the held for sale period for assets that were reclassified from held for sale to held and used. This adjustment resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of
$1.1 million
.
The
2012
and
2011
non-cash impairment charges related to assets held and used in continuing operations were included in Other Expenses (Income), Net in our Consolidated Statements of Income and were reported in the “Corporate and other” category of our segment information.
Long-lived Assets Held for Sale in Continuing Operations
During
2012
,
no
impairment charges were recorded for the carrying value of long-lived assets held for sale in continuing operations.
During
2011
, long-lived assets held for sale in continuing operations with a carrying amount of
$14.4 million
were written down to their fair value of
$12.9 million
, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of
$1.5 million
. Additionally, an adjustment of
$0.4 million
was recorded to long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying amount of
$0.6 million
as a result of an increase in the asset group’s fair value. The adjustment was limited to the carrying amount of
$1.0 million
at the time the long-lived asset group was initially classified as held for sale. The 2011 non-cash net impairment charges
88
related to assets held for sale in continuing operations were included in Other Expenses (Income), Net in our Consolidated Statements of Income and were reported in the “Corporate and other” category of our segment information.
Long-lived Assets Held for Sale in Discontinued Operations
During
2012
, long-lived assets held for sale in discontinued operations with a carrying amount of
$3.8 million
were written down to their fair value of
$3.7 million
, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of
$0.1 million
.
During
2011
, long-lived assets held for sale in discontinued operations with a carrying amount of
$11.4 million
were written down to their fair value of
$10.9 million
, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of
$0.5 million
.
The
2012
and
2011
non-cash impairment charges related to assets held for sale in discontinued operations were included in Loss from Discontinued Operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
As of
December 31, 2012
, we had assets held for sale of
$70.4 million
in continuing operations and
$43.2 million
in discontinued operations. As of
December 31, 2011
, we had assets held for sale of
$70.1 million
in continuing operations and
$49.5 million
in discontinued operations.
18. BUSINESS AND CREDIT CONCENTRATIONS
We own and operate franchised automotive stores in the United States pursuant to franchise agreements with vehicle manufacturers. Franchise agreements generally provide the manufacturers or distributors with considerable influence over the operations of the store. The success of any franchised automotive dealership is dependent, to a large extent, on the financial condition, management, marketing, production, and distribution capabilities of the vehicle manufacturers or distributors of which we hold franchises. We had receivables from manufacturers or distributors of
$159.9 million
at December 31,
2012
, and
$138.4 million
at December 31,
2011
. Additionally, a large portion of our Contracts-in-Transit included in Receivables, net, in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, are due from automotive manufacturers’ captive finance subsidiaries which provide financing directly to our new and used vehicle customers.
We purchase substantially all of our new vehicles from various manufacturers or distributors at the prevailing prices available to all franchised dealers. Additionally, we finance our new vehicle inventory primarily with automotive manufacturers’ captive finance subsidiaries. Our sales volume could be adversely impacted by the manufacturers’ or distributors’ inability to supply the stores with an adequate supply of vehicles and related financing.
We are subject to a concentration of risk in the event of financial distress of or other adverse event related to a major vehicle manufacturer. The core brands of vehicles that we sell are manufactured by
Toyota, Ford, Honda, Nissan, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Chrysler, and Volkswagen
. Our business could be materially adversely impacted by another bankruptcy of or other adverse event related to a major vehicle manufacturer or related lender.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to non-manufacturer trade receivables are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which our products are sold as well as their dispersion across many different geographic areas in the United States. Consequently, at December 31,
2012
, we do not consider AutoNation to have any significant non-manufacturer concentrations of credit risk.
89
19. CHARGEBACK RESERVES
We may be charged back for commissions related to financing, insurance, or vehicle protection products in the event of early termination, default, or prepayment of the contracts by customers (“chargebacks”). However, our exposure to loss in connection with financing arrangements generally is limited to the commissions that we receive. These commissions are recorded at the time of the sale of the vehicles, net of an estimated liability for chargebacks. The following is a rollforward of our estimated chargeback liability for each of the three years presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Balance - January 1
|
$
|
46.2
|
|
$
|
42.5
|
|
$
|
48.7
|
|
||
|
Add: Provisions
|
52.9
|
|
39.9
|
|
29.6
|
|
|||||
|
Deduct: Chargebacks
|
(43.1
|
)
|
(36.2
|
)
|
(35.8
|
)
|
|||||
|
Balance - December 31
|
$
|
56.0
|
|
$
|
46.2
|
|
$
|
42.5
|
|
||
20. SEGMENT INFORMATION
At December 31,
2012
,
2011
, and
2010
, we had
three
operating and reportable segments: (1) Domestic, (2) Import, and (3) Premium Luxury. As of March 31, 2012, we revised the basis of segmentation of our Import and Premium Luxury segments to reclassify Audi franchises from the Import segment to the Premium Luxury segment. In connection with this change, we reclassified historical amounts to conform to our current segment presentation. We reclassified revenue of
$187.7 million
and segment income of
$13.2 million
for 2011, and revenue of
$126.2 million
and segment income of
$11.3 million
for 2010 related to the five Audi franchises we held during these periods.
Our Domestic segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell new vehicles manufactured by General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler. Our Import segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell new vehicles manufactured primarily by Toyota, Honda, and Nissan. Our Premium Luxury segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell new vehicles manufactured primarily by Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Lexus. The franchises in each segment also sell used vehicles, parts and automotive services, and automotive finance and insurance products.
“Corporate and other” is comprised of our other businesses, including collision centers, a customer lead generation business, and an auction operation, each of which generates revenues, as well as unallocated corporate overhead expenses and retrospective commissions for certain financing and insurance transactions that we arrange under agreements with third parties.
The operating segments identified above are the business activities of the Company for which discrete financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly reviewed by our chief operating decision maker to allocate resources and assess performance. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. We have determined that our three operating segments also represent our reportable segments.
90
Reportable segment revenue, segment income, floorplan interest expense, depreciation and amortization, total assets, and capital expenditures are as follows:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
5,131.6
|
|
$
|
4,655.4
|
|
$
|
4,111.3
|
|
||
|
Import
|
5,828.8
|
|
4,933.3
|
|
4,582.2
|
|
|||||
|
Premium Luxury
|
4,553.3
|
|
4,096.4
|
|
3,635.2
|
|
|||||
|
Total segment income
|
15,513.7
|
|
13,685.1
|
|
12,328.7
|
|
|||||
|
Corporate and other
|
155.1
|
|
147.2
|
|
132.3
|
|
|||||
|
Total consolidated revenue
|
$
|
15,668.8
|
|
$
|
13,832.3
|
|
$
|
12,461.0
|
|
||
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Segment income
*
:
|
|||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
209.4
|
|
$
|
180.0
|
|
$
|
152.7
|
|
||
|
Import
|
257.9
|
|
227.1
|
|
188.2
|
|
|||||
|
Premium Luxury
|
270.4
|
|
244.1
|
|
219.7
|
|
|||||
|
Total segment income
|
737.7
|
|
651.2
|
|
560.6
|
|
|||||
|
Corporate and other
|
(137.9
|
)
|
(121.9
|
)
|
(106.5
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other interest expense
|
(86.9
|
)
|
(66.0
|
)
|
(56.1
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss on debt extinguishment
|
—
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|||||
|
Interest income
|
0.3
|
|
0.7
|
|
1.4
|
|
|||||
|
Other income (losses), net
|
3.6
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
1.5
|
|
|||||
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
$
|
516.8
|
|
$
|
461.3
|
|
$
|
381.3
|
|
||
*Segment income for each of our segments is defined as operating income less floorplan interest expense.
91
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Floorplan interest expense:
|
|||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
20.2
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
$
|
19.3
|
|
||
|
Import
|
14.2
|
|
11.2
|
|
12.7
|
|
|||||
|
Premium Luxury
|
10.7
|
|
9.7
|
|
9.2
|
|
|||||
|
Corporate and other
|
0.4
|
|
1.4
|
|
1.3
|
|
|||||
|
Total floorplan interest expense
|
$
|
45.5
|
|
$
|
42.7
|
|
$
|
42.5
|
|
||
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
$
|
20.7
|
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
||
|
Import
|
25.0
|
|
22.4
|
|
19.6
|
|
|||||
|
Premium Luxury
|
25.1
|
|
23.4
|
|
18.2
|
|
|||||
|
Corporate and other
|
14.2
|
|
17.2
|
|
18.7
|
|
|||||
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
87.3
|
|
$
|
83.7
|
|
$
|
76.8
|
|
||
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
1,883.8
|
|
$
|
1,557.7
|
|
$
|
1,447.7
|
|
||
|
Import
|
1,769.2
|
|
1,480.0
|
|
1,481.5
|
|
|||||
|
Premium Luxury
|
1,513.8
|
|
1,285.4
|
|
1,217.1
|
|
|||||
|
Corporate and other:
|
|||||||||||
|
Goodwill
|
1,237.4
|
|
1,172.2
|
|
1,142.1
|
|
|||||
|
Franchise rights
|
285.7
|
|
212.6
|
|
199.1
|
|
|||||
|
Other Corporate and other assets
|
513.1
|
|
490.9
|
|
486.7
|
|
|||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
7,203.0
|
|
$
|
6,198.8
|
|
$
|
5,974.2
|
|
||
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
69.5
|
|
$
|
31.7
|
|
$
|
23.2
|
|
||
|
Import
|
55.2
|
|
60.6
|
|
39.5
|
|
|||||
|
Premium Luxury
|
33.1
|
|
55.5
|
|
79.5
|
|
|||||
|
Corporate and other
|
25.8
|
|
10.3
|
|
19.6
|
|
|||||
|
Total capital expenditures
|
$
|
183.6
|
|
$
|
158.1
|
|
$
|
161.8
|
|
||
92
21. MULTIEMPLOYER PENSION PLANS
Five
of our
221
stores participate in multiemployer pension plans. We contribute to these multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under the terms of collective-bargaining agreements that cover certain of our union-represented employees. The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects:
|
a.
|
Assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.
|
|
b.
|
If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be assumed by the remaining participating employers.
|
|
c.
|
If we choose to stop participating in a multiemployer plan, we may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.
|
One of the multiemployer pension plans in which we participate is designated as being in “red zone” status, as defined by the Pension Protection Act (PPA) of 2006. Our participation in this plan for the year ended December 31,
2012
, is outlined in the table below. The “EIN/Pension Plan Number” column provides the Employer Identification Number (EIN) and the three-digit plan number. The most recent PPA zone status available in
2012
and
2011
is for the plan’s year end at December 31,
2011
, and December 31,
2010
, respectively. The zone status is based on information that we received from the plan and is certified by the plan’s actuary. Among other factors, plans in the red zone are generally
less than 65 percent
funded. The last column lists the expiration date of the collective-bargaining agreements to which the plan is subject. A rehabilitation plan has been implemented for this plan. There have been no significant changes that affect the comparability of
2012
,
2011
, and
2010
contributions.
|
Pension Protection Act Zone Status
|
Contributions of AutoNation
($ in millions) (1)
|
Expiration Date of Collective-Bargaining Agreement
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pension Fund
|
EIN/Pension PlanNumber
|
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
Surcharge Imposed
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Automotive Industries Pension Plan
|
94-1133245 - 001
|
Red
|
Red
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
No
|
(2)
|
||||||||
|
Other funds
|
0.3
|
|
0.2
|
|
0.2
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total contributions
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
(1)
|
Our stores were not listed in the Automotive Industries Pension Plan’s Form 5500 as providing more than 5% of the total contributions for the plan years ended December 31,
2011
or
2010
.
|
|
(2)
|
We are party to
two
collective-bargaining agreements that require contributions to the Automotive Industries Pension Plan. One expired May 31, 2011, and one expired June 30, 2011, and both are currently extended during collective bargaining for new agreements.
|
In the event that we decide to cease participating in this plan, we could be assessed a withdrawal liability. We currently do not have any plans that would trigger the withdrawal liability under this multiemployer pension plan.
93
Our operations generally experience higher volumes of vehicle sales and service in the second and third quarters of each year in part due to consumer buying trends and the introduction of new vehicle models. Also, demand for cars and light trucks is generally lower during the winter months than in other seasons, particularly in regions of the United States where stores may be subject to adverse winter weather conditions. Accordingly, we expect revenue and operating results generally to be lower in the first and fourth quarters as compared to the second and third quarters. However, revenue may be impacted significantly from quarter to quarter by changing economic conditions, vehicle manufacturer incentive programs, and actual or threatened severe weather events.
The following is an analysis of certain items in the Consolidated Statements of Income by quarter for
2012
and
2011
.
|
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
2012
|
$
|
3,657.0
|
|
$
|
3,904.5
|
|
$
|
3,933.8
|
|
$
|
4,173.5
|
|
||||
|
2011
|
$
|
3,311.1
|
|
$
|
3,336.3
|
|
$
|
3,506.5
|
|
$
|
3,678.4
|
|
|||||
|
Gross profit
(1)
|
2012
|
$
|
603.0
|
|
$
|
628.0
|
|
$
|
622.6
|
|
$
|
632.8
|
|
||||
|
2011
|
$
|
566.2
|
|
$
|
583.4
|
|
$
|
575.2
|
|
$
|
579.2
|
|
|||||
|
Operating income
(1)
|
2012
|
$
|
148.7
|
|
$
|
164.2
|
|
$
|
163.7
|
|
$
|
168.7
|
|
||||
|
2011
|
$
|
140.0
|
|
$
|
144.4
|
|
$
|
144.1
|
|
$
|
143.5
|
|
|||||
|
Income from continuing operations
(1)
|
2012
|
$
|
73.5
|
|
$
|
79.0
|
|
$
|
81.9
|
|
$
|
82.9
|
|
||||
|
2011
|
$
|
70.3
|
|
$
|
73.3
|
|
$
|
70.7
|
|
$
|
69.9
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
(1)
|
2012
|
$
|
73.0
|
|
$
|
78.6
|
|
$
|
81.6
|
|
$
|
83.2
|
|
||||
|
2011
|
$
|
69.4
|
|
$
|
71.9
|
|
$
|
70.7
|
|
$
|
69.4
|
|
|||||
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
(1) (2)
|
2012
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
||||
|
2011
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
(1) (2)
|
2012
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
||||
|
2011
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
During 2011 and 2012, we achieved certain manufacturer incentive program goals. As a result, we were able to recognize certain performance-based manufacturer incentives, primarily related to premium luxury vehicles previously sold. During 2011, the recognition of these incentives favorably impacted new vehicle gross profit by $4.6 million in the first quarter of 2011, $1.4 million in the second quarter of 2011, and $2.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2011. During 2012, the recognition of these incentives favorably impacted new vehicle gross profit by $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2012.
|
|
(2)
|
The sum of quarterly basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations may not equal full year amounts as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income due to the effect of the calculation of weighted average common stock equivalents on a quarterly basis.
|
94
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We have centralized certain key store-level accounting and administrative activities in substantially all of our stores, which we believe streamlines our internal control over financial reporting. As part of this centralization, we implemented a standard data processing platform in our stores and centralized to our shared services center certain key accounting processes and responsibilities, including accounting for certain accounts payable and receivable, vehicle sales, lien payoffs, receipt of vehicles, and floorplan transactions, as well as certain bank account and other reconciliation processes.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation
,
our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2012
. Our independent auditor, KPMG LLP, also concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as set forth in its Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
The SEC allows companies to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the first year of an acquisition. As permitted, management elected to exclude the six stores that we acquired on December 21, 2012 (Boardwalk Audi, Boardwalk Porsche, Boardwalk Volkswagen, Park Cities Volkswagen, McKinney Volkswagen, and Spring Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, as there was not an adequate amount of time between the acquisition date and the date of management’s assessment. The total assets of these six stores represented approximately 4% of our total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2012. From the December 21, 2012 acquisition date to December 31, 2012, the amounts of revenue of the six stores acquired included in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2012, were not material.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
95
PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information under the heading “Executive Officers of AutoNation” in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference in this section.
We have adopted a Code of Business Ethics applicable to all employees. In addition, we have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Officers applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and other senior officers and a Code of Ethics for Directors applicable to our directors. These codes are available on our Investor Relations website at
investors.autonation.com
. In the event that we amend or waive any of the provisions of the Code of Ethics for Senior Officers that relate to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, we intend to disclose the same on our Investor Relations website.
The other information required by this item is incorporated by reference to AutoNation’s Proxy Statement for its
2013
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31,
2012
.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to AutoNation’s Proxy Statement for its
2013
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31,
2012
.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to AutoNation’s Proxy Statement for its
2013
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31,
2012
.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to AutoNation’s Proxy Statement for its
2013
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31,
2012
.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to AutoNation’s Proxy Statement for its
2013
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31,
2012
.
96
PART IV
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
1.
|
Financial Statements: The Consolidated Financial Statements of AutoNation are set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
|
|
2.
|
Financial Statement Schedules: Not applicable.
|
|
3.
|
Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed, furnished or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K.
|
Certain of the agreements listed as exhibits to this Form 10-K (including the exhibits to such agreements), which have been filed to provide investors with information regarding their terms, contain various representations, warranties, and covenants of AutoNation, Inc. and the other parties thereto. They are not intended to provide factual information about any of the parties thereto or any subsidiaries of the parties thereto. The assertions embodied in those representations, warranties, and covenants were made for purposes of each of the agreements, solely for the benefit of the parties thereto. In addition, certain representations and warranties were made as of a specific date, may be subject to a contractual standard of materiality different from what a security holder might view as material, or may have been made for purposes of allocating contractual risk among the parties rather than establishing matters as facts. Investors should not view the representations, warranties, and covenants in the agreements (or any description thereof) as disclosures with respect to the actual state of facts concerning the business, operations, or condition of any of the parties to the agreements (or their subsidiaries) and should not rely on them as such. In addition, information in any such representations, warranties, or covenants may change after the dates covered by such provisions, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the public disclosures of the parties. In any event, investors should read the agreements together with the other information concerning AutoNation, Inc. contained in reports and statements that we file with the SEC.
97
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
AUTONATION, INC.
|
||
|
(Registrant)
|
||
|
|
||
|
By:
|
|
/s/ M
ICHAEL
J. J
ACKSON
|
|
|
Michael J. Jackson, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/
S
/ M
ICHAEL
J. J
ACKSON
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Michael J. Jackson
|
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|||
|
/
S
/ M
ICHAEL
J. S
HORT
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Michael J. Short
|
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|||
|
/
S
/ M
ICHAEL
J. S
TEPHAN
|
Vice President – Corporate
|
February 14, 2013
|
||
|
Michael J. Stephan
|
|
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/
S
/ R
OBERT
J. B
ROWN
|
|
Director
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Robert J. Brown
|
|
|
||
|
/
S
/ R
ICK
L. B
URDICK
|
|
Director
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Rick L. Burdick
|
||||
|
/
S
/ W
ILLIAM
C. C
ROWLEY
|
|
Director
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
William C. Crowley
|
||||
|
/
S
/ D
AVID
B. E
DELSON
|
|
Director
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
David B. Edelson
|
||||
|
/
S
/ R
OBERT
R. G
RUSKY
|
|
Director
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Robert R. Grusky
|
||||
|
/
S
/ M
ICHAEL
L
ARSON
|
|
Director
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Michael Larson
|
|
|
||
|
/
S
/ M
ICHAEL
E. M
AROONE
|
|
Director
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Michael E. Maroone
|
||||
|
/
S
/ C
ARLOS
A. M
IGOYA
|
|
Director
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Carlos A. Migoya
|
||||
|
/
S
/ A
LISON
H. R
OSENTHAL
|
|
Director
|
|
February 14, 2013
|
|
Alison H. Rosenthal
|
||||
98
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Form
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
||||||||
|
File Number
|
Exhibit
|
Filing Date
|
|||||||||
|
3.1
|
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AutoNation, Inc.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
3.1
|
|
8/13/99
|
|||||
|
3.2
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of AutoNation, Inc.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
3.1
|
|
3/23/12
|
|||||
|
4.1
|
Indenture, dated April 14, 2010 (the “2010 Indenture”), among AutoNation, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
4.1
|
|
4/15/10
|
|||||
|
4.2
|
Supplemental Indenture to 2010 Indenture, dated April 14, 2010, relating to the Company’s 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
4.2
|
|
4/15/10
|
|||||
|
4.3
|
Form of 6.75% Senior Notes due 2018 (included in Exhibit 4.14).
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
4.2
|
|
4/15/10
|
|||||
|
4.4
|
Supplemental Indenture to 2010 Indenture, dated February 1, 2012, relating to the Company’s 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
4.2
|
|
2/1/12
|
|||||
|
4.5
|
Form of 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.16).
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
4.2
|
|
2/1/12
|
|||||
|
4.6
|
Supplemental Indenture to 2010 Indenture, dated March 7, 2012, relating to the Company’s 6.75% Senior Notes due 2020.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
4.5
|
|
4/25/12
|
|||||
|
4.7
|
Supplemental Indenture to 2010 Indenture, dated March 7, 2012, relating to the Company’s 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
4.6
|
|
4/25/12
|
|||||
|
10.1
|
AutoNation, Inc. 1995 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended to date.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.2
|
|
8/14/00
|
|||||
|
10.2
|
AutoNation, Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
|
10-K
|
001-13107
|
10.10
|
|
3/31/99
|
|||||
|
10.3
|
Amendment, dated October 24, 2006, to the AutoNation, Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.1
|
|
10/27/06
|
|||||
|
10.4
|
AutoNation, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated on February 5, 2007.
|
10-K
|
001-13107
|
10.4
|
|
2/28/07
|
|||||
|
10.5
|
AutoNation, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated on February 5, 2007.
|
10-K
|
001-13107
|
10.5
|
|
2/28/07
|
|||||
|
10.6
|
AutoNation, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated.
|
S-8
|
333-170737
|
10.1
|
|
11/19/10
|
|||||
|
10.7
|
Employment Agreement dated July 20, 2010, between AutoNation, Inc. and Michael J. Jackson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.4
|
|
7/22/10
|
|||||
|
10.8
|
Employment Agreement dated July 20, 2010, between AutoNation, Inc. and Michael E. Maroone, President and Chief Operating Officer.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.5
|
|
7/22/10
|
|||||
|
10.9
|
AutoNation, Inc. 2007 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
|
10-K
|
001-13107
|
10.17
|
|
2/28/07
|
|||||
|
10.10
|
Amendment to the AutoNation, Inc. 2007 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, effective as of October 26, 2010.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.4
|
|
10/28/10
|
|||||
|
10.11
|
Amendment to the AutoNation, Inc. 2007 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, effective as of February 1, 2012.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.2
|
|
2/2/12
|
|||||
99
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Form
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
||||||||
|
File Number
|
Exhibit
|
Filing Date
|
|||||||||
|
10.12
|
Form of Waiver, executed by each of the Company’s non-employee directors.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.1
|
|
7/27/11
|
|||||
|
10.13
|
AutoNation, Inc. Senior Executive Incentive Bonus Plan.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.1
|
|
2/2/12
|
|||||
|
10.14
|
AutoNation, Inc. 2008 Employee Equity and Incentive Plan.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.1
|
|
4/25/08
|
|||||
|
10.15
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for stock options granted under the AutoNation, Inc. employee stock options plans other than the 2008 Employee Equity and Incentive Plan.
|
10-K
|
001-13107
|
10.12
|
|
2/24/05
|
|||||
|
10.16
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2008 Employee Equity and Incentive Plan (for 2008 grants).
|
10-K
|
001-13107
|
10.16
|
|
2/17/09
|
|||||
|
10.17
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2008 Employee Equity Incentive and Incentive Plan (for 2008 grants).
|
10-K
|
001-13107
|
10.17
|
|
2/17/09
|
|||||
|
10.18
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2008 Employee Equity and Incentive Plan (for grants in 2009 and thereafter).
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.4
|
|
4/24/09
|
|||||
|
10.19
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2008 Employee Equity and Incentive Plan (for grants in 2009 and thereafter).
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.5
|
|
4/24/09
|
|||||
|
10.20
|
Honda Agreement, dated January 28, 2009, between AutoNation, Inc., American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and ESL Investments, Inc.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.1
|
|
1/29/09
|
|||||
|
10.21
|
Toyota Agreement, dated January 28, 2009 (the “Toyota Agreement”), among AutoNation, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., ESL Investments, Inc. and certain investment affiliates of ESL Investments, Inc.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.2
|
|
1/29/09
|
|||||
|
10.22
|
Extension Agreement, dated November 23, 2009, among AutoNation, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and ESL Investments, Inc. and certain investment affiliates of ESL Investments, Inc.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.2
|
|
11/24/09
|
|||||
|
10.23
|
Amendment, dated April 23, 2010, among AutoNation, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., ESL Investments, Inc. and certain investment affiliates of ESL Investments, Inc., amending the Toyota Agreement.
|
10-Q
|
001-13107
|
10.4
|
|
4/23/10
|
|||||
|
10.24
|
Second Extension Agreement, dated December 16, 2010, among AutoNation, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and ESL Investments, Inc. and certain investment affiliates of ESL Investments, Inc.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.4
|
|
12/17/10
|
|||||
|
10.25
|
Extension and Amendment Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2011, among AutoNation, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., ESL Investments, Inc. and certain investment affiliates of ESL Investments, Inc.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.5
|
|
11/30/11
|
|||||
|
10.26
|
Fourth Extension Agreement, dated December 12, 2012, among AutoNation, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and ESL Investments, Inc. and certain investment affiliates of ESL Investments, Inc.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.6
|
|
12/14/12
|
|||||
|
10.27
|
Stockholder Agreement, dated August 16, 2010, among AutoNation, Inc., Cascade Investment, L.L.C. and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.1
|
|
8/16/10
|
|||||
|
10.28
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2011, by and among the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto.
|
8-K
|
001-13107
|
10.1
|
|
12/8/11
|
|||||
100
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Form
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
||||||||
|
File Number
|
Exhibit
|
Filing Date
|
|||||||||
|
12.1*
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
||||||||||
|
21.1*
|
Subsidiaries of AutoNation, Inc.
|
||||||||||
|
23.1*
|
Consent of KPMG LLP.
|
||||||||||
|
31.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
|
||||||||||
|
31.2*
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
|
||||||||||
|
32.1**
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
||||||||||
|
32.2**
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
||||||||||
|
101.INS*
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
||||||||||
|
101.SCH*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
||||||||||
|
101.CAL*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
||||||||||
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
*
|
Filed herewith
|
|
**
|
Furnished herewith
|
Exhibits 10.1 through 10.19 are management contracts or compensatory plans, contracts, or arrangements.
In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, copies of certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company or its subsidiaries are not filed herewith. We hereby agree to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Commission upon request.
101
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IprintItem 1. BusinessprintItem 1A. Risk FactorsprintItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsprintItem 2. PropertiesprintItem 3. Legal ProceedingsprintItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresprintPart IIprintItem 5. Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesprintItem 6. Selected Financial DataprintItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsprintItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskprintItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataprintItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureprintItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresprintItem 9B. Other InformationprintPart IIIprintItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceprintItem 11. Executive CompensationprintItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersprintItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceprintItem 14. Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesprintPart IVprintItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedulesprint