ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO /DE/
10-Qs and 10-Ks
PROXIES
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
February 2, 2013
OR
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission file number
1-12107
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
|
31-1469076
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
6301 Fitch Path, New Albany, Ohio
|
|
43054
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
(614) 283-6500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred
Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
¨
Yes
x
No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).)
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
Large accelerated filer
x
|
|
Accelerated filer
¨
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
¨
|
|
Smaller reporting company
¨
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|||||
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
¨
Yes
x
No
Aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Class A Common Stock (the only outstanding common equity of the Registrant) held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (for this purpose, executive officers and directors of the Registrant are considered affiliates) as of July 27, 2012: $2,991,111,716.
Number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock as o
f March 22, 2013: 78,166,993 s
hares of Class A Common Stock.
DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be held on June 20, 2013, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
ITEM 1.
|
||
|
ITEM 1A.
|
||
|
ITEM 1B.
|
||
|
ITEM 2.
|
||
|
ITEM 3.
|
||
|
ITEM 4.
|
||
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM.
|
||
|
ITEM 5.
|
||
|
ITEM 6.
|
||
|
ITEM 7.
|
||
|
ITEM 7A.
|
||
|
ITEM 8.
|
||
|
ITEM 9.
|
||
|
ITEM 9A.
|
||
|
ITEM 9B.
|
||
|
ITEM 10.
|
||
|
ITEM 11.
|
||
|
ITEM 12.
|
||
|
ITEM 13.
|
||
|
ITEM 14.
|
||
|
ITEM 15.
|
||
PART I
|
ITEM 1.
|
BUSINESS.
|
G
ENERAL
.
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (“A&F”), a company incorporated in Delaware in 1996, through its subsidiaries (collectively, A&F and its subsidiaries, are referred to as “Abercrombie & Fitch” or the “Company”), is a specialty retailer that operates stores and direct-to-consumer operations. Through these channels, the Company sells a broad array of products, including: casual sportswear apparel, including knit and woven shirts, graphic t-shirts, fleece, jeans and woven pants, shorts, sweaters, and outerwear; personal care products; and accessories for men, women and kids under the Abercrombie & Fitch, abercrombie kids, and Hollister brands. The Company also operates stores and direct-to-consumer operations offering bras, underwear, personal care products, sleepwear and at-home products for girls under the Gilly Hicks brand. As of
February 2, 2013
, the Company operated 912 stores in the United States (“U.S.”) and 139 stores outside of the U.S.
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31, typically resulting in a fifty-two week year, but occasionally giving rise to an additional week, resulting in a fifty-three week year as was the case for Fiscal 2012. Fiscal years are designated in the consolidated financial statements and notes by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. All references herein to “Fiscal 2012” represent the 53-week fiscal year ended February 2, 2013; to “Fiscal 2011” represent the 52-week fiscal year ended January 28, 2012; and to “Fiscal 2010” represent the 52-week fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. In addition, all references herein to “Fiscal 2013” represent the 52-week fiscal year that will end on February 1, 2014.
A&F makes available free of charge on its Internet website, www.abercrombie.com, under “Investors, SEC Filings,” its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as well as A&F’s definitive proxy materials filed pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after A&F electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC maintains a website that contains electronic filings by A&F and other issuers at www.sec.gov. In addition, the public may read and copy any materials A&F files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The Company has included its Internet website addresses throughout this filing as textual references only. The information contained within these Internet websites is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
D
ESCRIPTION
OF
O
PERATIONS
.
Brands.
Abercrombie & Fitch.
Rooted in East Coast traditions and Ivy League heritage, Abercrombie & Fitch is the essence of privilege and casual luxury. The Adirondacks supply a clean inspiration to this preppy, youthful All-American lifestyle. A combination of classic and sexy creates a charged atmosphere that is confident and just a bit provocative. Idolized and respected, Abercrombie & Fitch is timeless and always cool.
abercrombie kids.
The essence of privilege and prestigious East Coast prep schools, abercrombie kids directly follows in the footsteps of Abercrombie & Fitch. With an energetic attitude, abercrombie kids are popular, wholesome and athletic. Casual, with classic, preppy style, abercrombie kids aspire to be like their older sibling, Abercrombie & Fitch. The perfect combination of maturity and mischief, abercrombie kids are the signature of All-American cool.
Hollister.
Hollister is the fantasy of Southern California. It’s all about hot lifeguards and beautiful beaches. Young and fun, with a sense of humor, Hollister never takes itself too seriously. Hollister’s laidback lifestyle and All-American image is timeless and effortlessly cool. Hollister brings Southern California to the world.
Gilly Hicks.
Gilly Hicks is the cheeky cousin of Abercrombie & Fitch. Inspired by the free spirit of Sydney, Australia, Gilly Hicks makes the hottest Push ‘Em Up bras and the cutest Down Undies for young, naturally beautiful, confident girls. Carefree and undeniably pretty, Gilly Hicks is the All-American brand with a Sydney sensibility.
Though each of the Company’s brands embodies its own heritage and handwriting, the brands share common elements and characteristics. The brands are classic, casual, confident, intelligent, privileged and possess a sense of humor.
Refer to the “FINANCIAL SUMMARY” in “ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding net sales and other financial and operational data by segment and by brand.
3
F
INANCIAL
I
NFORMATION
ABOUT
S
EGMENTS
.
The Company determines its segments on the same basis that it uses to evaluate performance. All of the Company’s segments sell a similar group of products — casual sportswear apparel, personal care products and accessories for men, women and kids and bras, underwear and sleepwear for girls. The Company has three reportable segments: U.S. Stores, International Stores and Direct-to-Consumer. Refer to Note 2,
“SEGMENT REPORTING,”
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the Company’s reportable segments.
I
N
-S
TORE
E
XPERIENCE
AND
S
TORE
O
PERATIONS
.
The Company views the customer’s in-store experience as the primary means of communicating the spirit of each brand. The Company emphasizes the senses of sight, sound, smell, touch and energy by utilizing the visual presentation of merchandise, in-store marketing, music, fragrances, rich fabrics and its sales associates to reinforce the aspirational lifestyles represented by the brands.
The Company’s in-store marketing is designed to convey the principal elements and personality of each brand. The store design, furniture, fixtures and music are all carefully planned and coordinated to create a shopping experience that reflects the Abercrombie & Fitch, abercrombie kids, Hollister or Gilly Hicks lifestyle.
The Company’s sales associates and managers are a central element in creating the atmosphere of the stores. In addition to serving customers, sales associates and managers reflect the casual, energetic and aspirational attitude of the brands.
Merchandise is similarly displayed, regardless of location, to ensure a consistent in-store experience. Store managers receive detailed plans designating fixture and merchandise placement to ensure coordinated execution of the Company-wide merchandising strategy. In addition, standardization of each brand’s store design and merchandise presentation enables the Company to open new stores efficiently.
At the end of Fiscal
2012
, the Company operated 1,051 stores. The following table details the number of retail stores operated by the Company at
February 2, 2013
:
|
Fiscal 2012
|
Abercrombie &
Fitch
|
abercrombie
kids
|
Hollister
|
Gilly Hicks
|
Total
|
|||||
|
U.S.
|
266
|
144
|
482
|
20
|
912
|
|||||
|
International
|
19
|
6
|
107
|
7
|
139
|
|||||
|
Total
|
285
|
150
|
589
|
27
|
1,051
|
|||||
D
IRECT
-
TO
-C
ONSUMER
B
USINESS
.
The Company operates websites for each brand, both domestically and internationally. The websites reinforce each particular brand’s lifestyle, and are designed to complement the in-store experience. Total net sales through direct-to-consumer operations, including shipping and handling revenue, were
$700.7 million
for Fiscal
2012
, representing
16%
of total net sales. The Company believes its direct-to-consumer operations have broadened its market and brand recognition worldwide.
M
ARKETING
AND
A
DVERTISING
.
The Company considers the in-store experience to be its primary marketing vehicle. The Company’s marketing strategy emphasizes the senses to reinforce the aspirational lifestyle represented by each brand. The Company’s flagship stores represent the pinnacle of the Company’s in-store branding efforts. The Company also engages its customers through the internet, social media and mobile commerce in ways that reinforce the aspirational lifestyle of the brands. Flagship stores, e-commerce and digital marketing, inclusive of social media, attract a substantial number of international consumers and have significantly contributed to the worldwide status of the Company’s iconic brands. In addition, the Company launched A&F and Hollister club programs during the third quarter of Fiscal 2012 to further engage customers. Including email addresses and mobile phone numbers, the Company's total customer relationship management database has over ten million contacts.
M
ERCHANDISE
S
UPPLIERS
.
During Fiscal
2012
, the Company sourced merchandise through approximately 155 vendors located throughout the world; primarily in Asia and Central and South America. The Company did not source more than 10% of its merchandise from any single factory or supplier during Fiscal
2012
. The Company pursues a global sourcing strategy that includes relationships with vendors in 20 countries, as well as the United States. The Company’s foreign sourcing of merchandise is negotiated and settled in U.S. Dollars.
4
All product sources, including independent manufacturers and suppliers, must achieve and maintain the Company’s high quality standards, which are an integral part of the Company’s identity. The Company has established supplier product quality standards to ensure the high quality of fabrics and other materials used in the Company’s products. The Company utilizes both home office and field employees to help monitor compliance with the Company’s product quality standards.
Before the Company begins production with any factory, the factory must first go through a quality assurance inspection to ensure it meets Company standards. This includes factories that are subcontractors to the factories and vendors with whom the Company works. All business partners are contractually required to adhere to our vendor Code of Conduct, and all new factories go through an initial social audit, which includes a factory walk-through to appraise the physical working conditions and health and safety practices, as well as payroll and age document review. Social audits on the factories are also performed once a year after the initial audit. The Company strives to partner with suppliers who respect local laws and share our dedication to utilize best practices in human rights, labor rights, environmental practices and workplace safety.
D
ISTRIBUTION
AND
M
ERCHANDISE
I
NVENTORY
.
The Company’s merchandise is shipped to the Company’s distribution centers (“DCs”) where it is received and inspected before being shipped to stores or direct-to-consumer customers. The Company uses its two DCs in New Albany, Ohio to support its North American stores, and direct-to-consumer customers outside of Europe. The Company uses a third-party DC in the Netherlands for the distribution of merchandise to stores and direct-to-consumer customers located in Europe, and a third-party DC in Hong Kong for the distribution of merchandise to stores located in Asia. The Company utilizes primarily one contract carrier to ship merchandise and related materials to its North American stores and direct-to-consumer customers, and a separate contract carrier for its European and Asian stores and direct-to-consumer customers.
The Company strives to maintain sufficient quantities of inventory in its retail stores and DCs to offer customers a full selection of current merchandise. The Company attempts to balance in-stock levels and inventory turnover, and to take markdowns when required to keep merchandise fresh and current with fashion trends.
I
NFORMATION
S
YSTEMS
.
The Company’s management information systems consist of a full range of retail, merchandising and financial systems. The systems include applications related to point-of-sale, direct-to-consumer, inventory management, supply chain, planning, sourcing, merchandising and financial reporting. The Company continues to invest in technology to upgrade core systems to make the Company scalable, efficient, and more accurate, including support of its international expansion.
S
EASONAL
B
USINESS
.
The retail apparel market has two principal selling seasons: the Spring season which includes the first and second fiscal quarters (“Spring”); and the Fall season which includes the third and fourth fiscal quarters (“Fall”). As is typical in the apparel industry, the Company experiences its greatest sales activity during the Fall season due to the Back-to-School (August) and Holiday (November and December) selling periods, particularly in the U.S.
T
RADEMARKS
.
The Abercrombie & Fitch
®
, abercrombie
®
, Hollister
®
, Gilly Hicks
®
, “Moose” and “Seagull” trademarks are registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the registries of countries where stores are located or likely to be located in the future. In addition, these trademarks are either registered, or the Company has applications for registration pending, with the registries of many of the foreign countries in which the manufacturers of the Company’s products are located. The Company has also registered, or has applied to register, certain other trademarks in the U.S. and around the world. The Company believes its products are identified by its trademarks and, therefore, its trademarks are of significant value. Each registered trademark has a duration of ten to 20 years, depending on the date it was registered, and the country in which it is registered, and is subject to an indefinite number of renewals for a like period upon continued use and appropriate application. The Company intends to continue using its core trademarks and to renew each of its registered trademarks that remain in use.
O
THER
I
NFORMATION
.
Additional information about the Company’s business, including its revenues and profits for the last three fiscal years and gross square footage of stores, is set forth under “ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
C
OMPETITION
.
The sale of apparel, accessories and personal care products through stores and direct-to-consumer channels is a highly competitive business with numerous participants, including individual and chain fashion specialty stores, as well as regional and national department stores. As the Company continues expanding internationally, it also faces competition in local markets from established chains, as well as local specialty stores. Brand recognition, fashion, price, service, store location, selection and quality are the principal competitive factors in retail store and direct-to-consumer sales.
5
The competitive challenges facing the Company include: anticipating and quickly responding to changing fashion trends and maintaining the aspirational positioning of its brands. Furthermore, the Company faces additional competitive challenges as many retailers continue promotional activities, particularly in the U.S. In response to these conditions, the Company has engaged in promotional activity while continuing to focus on preserving the value of its brands.
A
SSOCIATE
R
ELATIONS
.
As of
March 22, 2013, the Co
mpany employed approximately
98,000 associates. Approximately 88,000 of
the Company’s associates were part-time associates.
On average, the Company employed approximately 26,000 full-time equivalents during Fiscal 2012 which included approximately 15,000 full-time equivalents comprised of part-time associates, including temporary associates hired during peak periods, such as the Back-to-School and Holiday seasons.
The Company believes it maintains a good relationship with its associates. However, in the normal course of business, the Company is party to lawsuits involving former and current associates.
E
NVIRONMENTAL
M
ATTERS
.
Compliance with domestic and international regulations related to environmental matters has not had, nor is it expected to have, any material effect on capital expenditures, earnings, or the Company’s competitive position based on information and circumstances known to us at this time.
6
|
ITEM 1A.
|
RISK FACTORS
|
F
ORWARD
-L
OOKING
S
TATEMENTS
A
ND
R
ISK
F
ACTORS
.
We caution that any forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or made by us, our management or our spokespeople involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, many of which may be beyond our control. Words such as “estimate,” “project,” “plan,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements. Except as may be required by applicable law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise our forward-looking statements.
The following factors could affect our financial performance and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any of the forward-looking statements:
|
•
|
changes in economic and financial conditions, and the resulting impact on consumer confidence and consumer spending, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and liquidity;
|
|
•
|
changing fashion trends and consumer preferences, and the ability to manage our inventory commensurate with customer demand, could adversely impact our sales levels and profitability;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in the cost, availability and quality of raw materials, labor and transportation, could cause manufacturing delays and increase our costs;
|
|
•
|
our growth strategy relies significantly on international expansion, which requires significant capital investment, adds complexity to our operations and may strain our resources and adversely impact current store performance;
|
|
•
|
our international expansion plan is dependent on a number of factors, any of which could delay or prevent successful penetration into new markets or could adversely affect the profitability of our international operations;
|
|
•
|
our direct-to-consumer operations are subject to numerous risks that could adversely impact sales;
|
|
•
|
equity-based compensation awarded under the employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer could adversely impact our cash flows, financial position or results of operations and could have a dilutive effect on our outstanding Common Stock;
|
|
•
|
our development of a new brand concept such as Gilly Hicks could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations;
|
|
•
|
our business could suffer if our information technology systems are disrupted or cease to operate effectively;
|
|
•
|
comparable sales, including direct-to-consumer, may continue to fluctuate on a regular basis and impact the volatility of the price of our Common Stock;
|
|
•
|
our market share may be negatively impacted by increasing competition and pricing pressures from companies with brands or merchandise competitive with ours;
|
|
•
|
our ability to attract customers to our stores depends, in part, on the success of the shopping malls or area attractions in which most of our stores are located;
|
|
•
|
our net sales fluctuate on a seasonal basis, causing our results of operations to be susceptible to changes in Back-to-School and Holiday shopping patterns;
|
|
•
|
our failure to protect our reputation could have a material adverse effect on our brands;
|
|
•
|
we rely on the experience and skills of our senior executive officers, the loss of whom could have a material adverse effect on our business;
|
|
•
|
interruption in the flow of merchandise from our key vendors and international manufacturers could disrupt our supply chain, which could result in lost sales and could increase our costs;
|
|
•
|
In a number of our European stores, associates are represented by workers’ councils and unions, whose demands could adversely affect our profitability or operating standards for our brands;
|
|
•
|
we depend upon independent third parties for the manufacture and delivery of all our merchandise;
|
|
•
|
our reliance on two distribution centers domestically and two third-party distribution centers internationally makes us susceptible to disruptions or adverse conditions affecting our distribution centers;
|
|
•
|
we may be exposed to risks and costs associated with credit card fraud and identity theft that would cause us to incur unexpected expenses and loss of revenues;
|
|
•
|
our facilities, systems and stores, as well as the facilities and systems of our vendors and manufacturers, are vulnerable to natural disasters, pandemic disease and other unexpected events, any of which could result in an interruption to our business and adversely affect our operating results;
|
|
•
|
our litigation exposure could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations;
|
|
•
|
our inability or failure to adequately protect our trademarks could have a negative impact on our brand image and limit our ability to penetrate new markets;
|
7
|
•
|
fluctuations in our tax obligations and effective tax rate may result in volatility in our operating results;
|
|
•
|
the effects of war or acts of terrorism could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition;
|
|
•
|
our inability to obtain commercial insurance at acceptable prices or our failure to adequately reserve for self-insured exposures might increase our expenses and adversely impact our financial results;
|
|
•
|
operating results and cash flows at the store level may cause us to incur impairment charges;
|
|
•
|
we are subject to customs, advertising, consumer protection, privacy, zoning and occupancy and labor and employment laws that could require us to modify our current business practices, incur increased costs or harm our reputation if we do not comply;
|
|
•
|
changes in the regulatory or compliance landscape could adversely affect our business and results of operations;
|
|
•
|
our unsecured Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) and our Term Loan Agreement include financial and other covenants that impose restrictions on our financial and business operations; and
|
|
•
|
compliance with changing regulations and standards for accounting, corporate governance and public disclosure could adversely affect our business, results of operations and reported financial results.
|
The following sets forth a description of the preceding risk factors that we believe may be relevant to an understanding of our business. These risk factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any of our forward-looking statements.
Changes in economic and financial conditions, and the resulting impact on consumer confidence and consumer spending, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and liquidity.
Our business depends on consumer demand for our merchandise. Consumer purchases of discretionary items, including our merchandise, generally decline during recessionary periods and other periods where disposable income is adversely affected. Our performance is subject to factors that affect worldwide economic conditions including unemployment, consumer credit availability, consumer debt levels, reductions in net worth based on declines in the financial, residential real estate and mortgage markets, sales tax rates and tax rate increases, fuel and energy prices, interest rates, consumer confidence in future economic and political conditions, consumer perceptions of personal well-being and security, the value of the U.S. Dollar versus foreign currencies and other macroeconomic factors.
During Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2009, the combination of these factors caused consumer spending in the U.S. to deteriorate significantly. While consumer spending began to improve in Fiscal 2010 and continued to improve in Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2012, these factors may cause levels of spending to remain depressed relative to historical levels for the foreseeable future. These factors also may cause consumers to purchase products from lower-priced competitors or to defer purchases of apparel and personal care products.
In addition, we have significantly expanded our presence in the European market with stores in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Netherlands, Austria, Belgium, Spain, Italy, Ireland, Sweden, Poland and Denmark. The ongoing European debt crisis may impact consumer demand for our merchandise. The economic conditions and factors described above could adversely affect the productivity of our stores, as well as adversely affect the pace of opening new international stores, or their productivity once opened.
Economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources if reduced consumer demand for our merchandise should occur. It could also impact our ability to fund growth and/or result in our becoming reliant on external financing, the availability of which may be uncertain.
In addition, the economic environment may exacerbate some of the risks noted below, including consumer demand, strain on available resources, international growth strategy and the availability of real estate, interruption of the flow of merchandise from key vendors and manufacturers, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The risks could be exacerbated individually, or collectively.
Changing fashion trends and consumer preferences, and the ability to manage our inventory commensurate with customer demand, could adversely impact our sales levels and profitability.
Our success largely depends on our ability to anticipate and gauge the fashion preferences of our customers and provide merchandise that satisfies constantly shifting demands in a timely manner. Our merchandise and our brands must appeal to our consumers, whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are also subject to rapid change. We must translate market trends into appropriate, saleable merchandise far in advance of its sale in our stores or through our websites. Because we enter into agreements for the manufacture and purchase of merchandise well in advance of the applicable selling season, we are vulnerable to changes in consumer preferences and demand, pricing shifts, and the sub-optimal selection and timing of merchandise purchases. Moreover, there can be no assurance that we will continue to anticipate consumer demands and accurately plan inventory successfully in the future. Changing consumer preferences and fashion trends, whether we are able to
8
anticipate, identify and respond to them or not, could adversely impact our sales. Inventory levels for certain merchandise styles no longer considered to be “on trend” may increase, leading to higher markdowns to sell through excess inventory. A distressed economic and retail environment, in which many of our competitors continue to engage in aggressive promotional activities, particularly in the U.S., increases the importance of reacting appropriately to changing consumer preferences and fashion trends. Conversely, if we underestimate consumer demand for our merchandise, or if our manufacturers fail to supply quality products in a timely manner, we may experience inventory shortages, which may negatively impact customer relationships, diminish brand loyalty and result in lost sales. Any of these events could significantly harm our operating results and financial condition.
Fluctuations in the cost, availability and quality of raw materials, labor and transportation, could cause manufacturing delays and increase our costs.
Fluctuations in the cost, availability and quality of the fabrics or other raw materials used to manufacture our merchandise could have a material adverse effect on our cost of goods, or our ability to meet customer demand. The prices for such fabrics depend largely on the market prices for the raw materials used to produce them, particularly cotton. The price and availability of such raw materials may fluctuate significantly, depending on many factors, including crop yields and weather patterns. Such factors may be exacerbated by legislation and regulations associated with global climate change.
In addition, the cost of labor at many of our third-party manufacturers has been increasing significantly, and as the middle class in developing countries continues to grow, it is unlikely such cost pressure will abate. The cost of transportation has been increasing as well and, if the price of oil continues to increase, and there continues to be significant unrest in the Middle East, it is unlikely that such cost pressure will abate.
We may not be able to pass all or a portion of higher raw materials prices or labor or transportation costs on to our customers, which could adversely affect our gross margin and results of our operations.
Our growth strategy relies significantly on international expansion, which requires significant capital investment, adds complexity to our operations and may strain our resources and adversely impact current store performance.
Our growth strategy largely depends on the opening of new international stores. This international expansion has placed, and will continue to place, increased demands on our operational, managerial and administrative resources at all levels of the Company. These increased demands may cause us to operate our business less efficiently, which in turn could cause deterioration in the performance of our existing stores or could adversely affect our inventory levels. Furthermore, our ability to conduct business in international markets may be adversely affected by legal, regulatory, political and economic risks. Our international expansion strategy and success could also be adversely impacted by the global economy. Failure to properly implement our growth strategy could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations or could otherwise adversely affect our ability to achieve our objectives.
In addition, as we continue to expand our overseas operations, we are subject to certain U.S. laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, in addition to the laws of the foreign countries in which we operate. We must use all commercially reasonable efforts to ensure our associates comply with these laws. If any of our overseas operations, or our associates or agents, violate such laws, we could become subject to sanctions or other penalties that could negatively affect our reputation, business and operating results.
Our international expansion plan is dependent on a number of factors, any of which could delay or prevent successful penetration into new markets or could adversely affect the profitability of our international operations.
As we expand internationally, we may incur significant costs related to starting up and maintaining foreign operations. Costs may include, but are not limited to, obtaining prime locations for stores, setting up foreign offices and distribution centers, hiring experienced management and maintaining good relations with individual associates and groups of associates. We may be unable to open and operate new stores successfully, or we may face operational issues that delay our intended pace of international store openings, and, in any such case, our growth may be limited, unless we can:
|
•
|
identify suitable markets and sites for store locations;
|
|
•
|
address the different operational characteristics present in each country to which we expand, including employment and labor, transportation, logistics, real estate, lease provisions and local reporting or legal requirements;
|
|
•
|
negotiate acceptable lease terms, in some cases in locations in which the relative rights and obligations of landlords and tenants differ significantly from the customs and practices in the U.S.;
|
|
•
|
hire, train and retain competent store personnel;
|
|
•
|
gain and retain acceptance from foreign customers;
|
|
•
|
manage inventory effectively to meet the needs of new and existing stores on a timely basis;
|
|
•
|
expand infrastructure to accommodate growth;
|
9
|
•
|
foster current relationships and develop new relationships with vendors that are capable of supplying a greater volume of merchandise;
|
|
•
|
generate sufficient operating cash flows or secure adequate capital on commercially reasonable terms to fund our expansion plan;
|
|
•
|
manage foreign currency exchange risks effectively; and
|
|
•
|
achieve acceptable operating margins from new stores.
|
Failure to implement our international expansion plan consistent with our internal expectations, whether as a result of one or more of the factors listed above or other factors, could adversely affect our ability to achieve the objectives that we have established.
Our direct-to-consumer operations are subject to numerous risks that could adversely impact sales.
We sell merchandise for each brand over the Internet, both domestically and internationally. Our direct-to-consumer operations are subject to numerous risks, including:
|
•
|
reliance on third-party computer hardware/software providers;
|
|
•
|
rapid technological change and the implementation of new systems and platforms;
|
|
•
|
diversions of sales from our stores;
|
|
•
|
liability for online content;
|
|
•
|
violations of state, federal or international laws, including those relating to online privacy;
|
|
•
|
credit card fraud;
|
|
•
|
the failure of the computer systems that operate our websites and their related support systems, including computer viruses;
|
|
•
|
telecommunication failures and electronic break-ins and similar disruptions; and
|
|
•
|
disruption of Internet service, whether for technical reasons or as a result of state-sponsored censorship.
|
Our failure to successfully respond to these risks might adversely affect sales in our direct-to-consumer business, as well as damage our reputation and brands.
Equity-based compensation awarded under the employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer could adversely impact our cash flows, financial position or results of operations and could have a dilutive effect on our outstanding Common Stock.
Under the Employment Agreement entered into as of December 19, 2008, which expires February 1, 2014, between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (the “Employment Agreement”), Mr. Jeffries received grants (the “Retention Grants”) of stock appreciation rights. In addition to the Retention Grants, Mr. Jeffries is eligible to receive two equity-based grants during each fiscal year of the term of the Employment Agreement starting with Fiscal 2009 (each, a “Semi-Annual Grant”). The value of a Semi-Annual Grant is uncertain and dependent on the future market price of our Common Stock and our financial performance. To date, Mr. Jeffries has received Semi-Annual Grants, in the aggregate, of 3,752,259 stock appreciation rights.
In connection with the Semi-Annual Grants contemplated by the Employment Agreement, the related compensation expense could significantly impact our results of operations. In addition, the significant number of shares of Common Stock which could be issued to settle the Retention Grants and the Semi-Annual Grants is uncertain and dependent on the future market price of our Common Stock and our financial performance and would, if issued, have a dilutive effect with respect to our outstanding shares of Common Stock, which may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.
Our development of a new brand concept such as Gilly Hicks could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Historically, we have developed and launched new brands internally that have contributed to our sales growth. Our most recent brand, Gilly Hicks, offers bras, underwear, personal care products, sleepwear and at-home products for girls. The development and growth of new brand concepts, such as Gilly Hicks, requires management’s focus and attention, as well as significant capital investments. Furthermore, a new brand concept is susceptible to risks, including lack of customer acceptance, competition from existing or new retailers, product differentiation, production and distribution inefficiencies and unanticipated operating issues. There is no assurance that a new brand concept, including Gilly Hicks, will achieve successful results. The failure of Gilly Hicks to be launched and expanded successfully, and to achieve profitability, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The costs of exiting a brand are significant. In addition, the ongoing development of new concepts may place a strain on available resources.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.
10
The functional currency of our international subsidiaries is generally the local currency in which each operates, which includes British Pounds, Canadian Dollars, Chinese Yuan, Danish Kroner, Euros, Hong Kong Dollars, Japanese Yen, Polish Zloty, Singapore Dollars, South Korean Won, Swedish Kronor and Swiss Francs. Our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars. Therefore, we must translate revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities from functional currencies into U.S. Dollars at exchange rates in effect during, or at the end of the reporting period. In addition, our international subsidiaries transact in currencies other than their functional currency, including intercompany transactions, which could result in foreign currency transaction gains or losses. The fluctuation in the value of the U.S. Dollar against other currencies could impact our financial results.
Furthermore, we purchase substantially our entire inventory in U.S. Dollars. As a result, our gross margin rate from international operations is subject to volatility from movements in exchange rates over time, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and profitability from the growth desired from international operations.
Our business could suffer if our information technology systems are disrupted or cease to operate effectively.
We rely heavily on our information technology systems: to operate our websites; record and process transactions; respond to customer inquiries; manage inventory; purchase, sell and ship merchandise on a timely basis; and maintain cost-efficient operations. Given the significant number of transactions that are completed annually, it is vital to maintain constant operation of our computer hardware and software systems and maintain cyber security. Despite efforts to prevent such an occurrence, our information technology systems are vulnerable from time-to-time to damage or interruption from computer viruses, power outages, third-party intrusions and other technical malfunctions. If our systems are damaged, or fail to function properly, we may have to make monetary investments to repair or replace the systems, and we could endure delays in our operations.
In addition, we regularly evaluate our information technology systems and requirements and are currently implementing modifications and/or upgrades to the information technology systems that support our business. Modifications include replacing existing systems with successor systems, making changes to existing systems, or acquiring new systems with new functionality. We are aware of the inherent risks associated with replacing and modifying these systems, including inaccurate system information, system disruptions and user acceptance and understanding. We believe we are taking appropriate action to mitigate the risks through disciplined adherence to methodology, program management, testing and user involvement, as well as securing appropriate commercial contracts with third-party vendors supplying the replacement technologies.
Any material disruption or slowdown of our systems, including a disruption or slowdown caused by our failure to successfully upgrade our systems, could cause information, including data related to customer orders, to be lost or delayed. Such a loss or delay could - especially if the disruption or slowdown occurred during our peak selling seasons - result in delays of merchandise delivery to our stores and customers, which could reduce demand for our merchandise and cause our sales and profitability to decline.
Comparable sales, including direct-to-consumer, may continue to fluctuate on a regular basis and impact the volatility of the price of our Common Stock.
Our comparable sales, defined as year-over-year sales for a store that has been open as the same brand at least one year and the square footage of which has not been expanded or reduced by more than 20% and our direct to consumer sales, have fluctuated significantly in the past on an annual and quarterly basis and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. We believe that a variety of factors affect comparable sales results including, but not limited to, fashion trends, actions by competitors or mall anchor tenants, changes in economic conditions and consumer spending patterns, weather conditions, opening and/or closing of our stores in proximity to each other, the timing of the release of new merchandise and promotional events, changes in our merchandise mix and the calendar shifts of tax free and holiday periods.
Comparable sales fluctuations may impact our ability to leverage fixed direct expenses, including store rent and store asset depreciation, which may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
In addition, comparable sales fluctuations may have been an important factor in the volatility of the price of our Common Stock in the past, and it is likely that future comparable sales fluctuations will contribute to stock price volatility in the future.
Our market share may be negatively impacted by increasing competition and pricing pressures from companies with brands or merchandise competitive with ours.
The sale of apparel and personal care products through stores and direct-to-consumer channels is a highly competitive business with numerous participants, including individual and chain fashion specialty stores, as well as regional, national and international department stores. The substantial sales growth in the direct-to-consumer channel within the last few years has encouraged the entry of many new competitors and an increase in competition from established companies. We face a variety of competitive challenges, including:
11
|
•
|
anticipating and quickly responding to changing consumer demands or preferences better than our competitors;
|
|
•
|
maintaining favorable brand recognition and effectively marketing our products to consumers in several diverse demographic markets;
|
|
•
|
sourcing merchandise efficiently;
|
|
•
|
developing innovative, high-quality merchandise in styles that appeal to our consumers and in ways that favorably distinguish us from our competitors; and
|
|
•
|
countering the aggressive promotional activities of many of our competitors without diminishing the aspirational nature of our brands and brand equity.
|
In light of the competitive challenges we face, we may not be able to compete successfully in the future. Further, increases in competition could reduce our sales and harm our operating results and business.
Our ability to attract customers to our stores depends, in part, on the success of the shopping malls or area attractions in which most of our stores are located.
In order to generate customer traffic, we locate many of our stores in prominent locations within successful shopping malls or street locations. Our stores benefit from the ability of the malls’ “anchor” tenants, generally large department stores and other area attractions, to generate consumer traffic in the vicinity of our stores and the continuing popularity of malls in the U.S. and, increasingly, in many international locations as shopping destinations. We cannot control the development of new shopping malls in the U.S. or around the world; the availability or cost of appropriate locations; competition with other retailers for prominent locations; or the success of individual shopping malls. All of these factors may impact our ability to meet our productivity targets for our domestic stores and our growth objectives for our international stores and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, some malls that were in prominent locations when we opened stores may cease to be viewed as prominent. If this trend continues or if the popularity of mall shopping continues to decline generally among our customers, our sales may decline, which would impact our gross profits and net income.
Part of our future growth is dependent on our ability to operate stores in desirable locations with capital investment and lease costs providing the opportunity to earn a reasonable return. We cannot be sure as to when or whether such desirable locations will become available at reasonable costs.
Our net sales fluctuate on a seasonal basis, causing our results of operations to be susceptible to changes in Back-to-School and Holiday shopping patterns.
Historically, our operations have been seasonal, with a significant amount of net sales and net income occurring in the fourth fiscal quarter, due to the increased sales during the Holiday selling season and, to a lesser extent, the third fiscal quarter, reflecting increased sales during the Back-to-School selling season in the U.S. Our net sales and net income during the first and second fiscal quarters are typically lower due, in part, to the traditional slowdown in retail sales immediately following the Holiday selling season. As a result of this seasonality, net sales and net income during any fiscal quarter cannot be used as an accurate indicator of our annual results. Any factors negatively affecting us during the third and fourth fiscal quarters of any year, including inclement weather or unfavorable economic conditions, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations for the entire year.
Our failure to protect our reputation could have a material adverse effect on our brands.
Our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to our brands. Our reputation could be jeopardized if we fail to maintain high standards for merchandise quality and integrity. In addition, our reputation could be jeopardized if our third-party vendors fail to comply with our vendor code of conduct. Any negative publicity about these types of concerns may reduce demand for our merchandise. Failure to comply with ethical, social, product, labor, health and safety or environmental standards, or related political considerations, could also jeopardize our reputation and potentially lead to various adverse consumer actions, including boycotts. Public perception about our products or our stores, whether justified or not, could impair our reputation, involve us in litigation, damage our brands and have a material adverse effect on our business. Failure to comply with local laws and regulations, to maintain an effective system of internal controls or to provide accurate and timely financial statement information could also hurt our reputation. Damage to our reputation or loss of consumer confidence for any of these or other reasons could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation.
We rely on the experience and skills of our senior executive officers, the loss of whom could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our senior executive officers closely supervise all aspects of our business — in particular, the design of our merchandise and the operation of our stores. Our senior executive officers have substantial experience and expertise in the retail business and have made significant contributions to the growth and success of our brands. If we were to lose the benefit of their involvement — in particular the services of any one or more of Michael S. Jeffries, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
12
Diane Chang, Executive Vice President — Sourcing; Leslee K. Herro, Executive Vice President — Planning and Allocation; Jonathan E. Ramsden, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Ronald A. Robins, Jr., Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary; and Amy Zehrer, Executive Vice President — Stores — without adequate succession plans, our business could be adversely affected. Competition for such senior executive officers is intense, and we cannot be sure we will be able to attract, retain and develop a sufficient number of qualified senior executive officers in future periods.
Interruption in the flow of merchandise from our key vendors and international manufacturers could disrupt our supply chain, which could result in lost sales and could increase our costs.
We source the majority of our merchandise outside of the U.S. through arrangements with approximately 155 vendors which includes foreign manufacturers located throughout the world, primarily in Asia and Central and South America. In addition, many of our domestic manufacturers maintain production facilities overseas. Political, social or economic instability in Asia, Central or South America, or in other regions in which our manufacturers are located, could cause disruptions in trade, including exports to the U.S. Other events that could also cause disruptions to exports to the U.S. include:
|
•
|
the imposition of additional trade law provisions or regulations;
|
|
•
|
reliance on a limited number of shipping and air carriers who may experience capacity issues that adversely affect our ability to ship inventory in a timely manner or for an acceptable cost;
|
|
•
|
the imposition of additional duties, tariffs and other charges on imports and exports;
|
|
•
|
quotas imposed by bilateral textile agreements;
|
|
•
|
economic uncertainties and adverse economic conditions (including inflation and recession);
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in the value of the U.S. Dollar against foreign currencies;
|
|
•
|
restrictions on the transfer of funds;
|
|
•
|
the potential of manufacturer financial instability, inability to access needed liquidity or bankruptcy;
|
|
•
|
significant labor disputes, such as dock strikes;
|
|
•
|
significant delays in the delivery of cargo due to port security considerations;
|
|
•
|
financial or political instability in any of the countries in which our merchandise is manufactured;
|
|
•
|
natural disasters; and
|
|
•
|
regulations to address climate change.
|
In addition, we cannot predict whether the countries in which our merchandise is manufactured, or may be manufactured in the future, will be subject to new or additional trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. or foreign governments, including the likelihood, type or effect of any such restrictions. Trade restrictions, including new or increased tariffs or quotas, embargoes, safeguards and customs restrictions against apparel items, as well as U.S. or foreign labor strikes and work stoppages or boycotts, could increase the cost or reduce the supply of apparel available to us and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In a number of our European stores, associates are represented by workers’ councils and unions, whose demands could adversely affect our profitability or operating standards for our brands.
As of March 22, 2013, we employed approximately 98,000 associates, of whom approximately 88,000 were part-time associates and 12,000 were located in our European stores. In a number of our European stores, particularly in France and Germany, associates are represented by workers' councils and unions. These workers’ councils and unions, as well as government officials who support their positions, have, in a number of instances, made demands that could adversely affect our profitability or have a negative effect on the operating standards we believe are critical to our brands. We are committed to working with all of our associates, whether they are represented by a workers’ council or union or not, and we believe we maintain good relations with our associates; however, there can be no assurance that we will not experience work stoppages or other labor-related issues that could have an adverse effect on our profitability or on our operating standards.
We depend upon independent third parties for the manufacture and delivery of all our merchandise.
We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. As a result, the continued success of our operations is tied to our timely receipt of quality merchandise from third-party manufacturers. Our products are manufactured to our specifications primarily by foreign manufacturers. We cannot control all of the various factors, which include inclement weather, natural disasters, political and financial instability, strikes, health concerns regarding infectious diseases in countries in which our merchandise is produced, and acts of terrorism, that might affect a manufacturer’s ability to ship orders of our merchandise in a timely manner or to meet our quality standards. A manufacturer’s inability to ship orders in a timely manner or meet our quality standards could cause delays in responding to consumer demands and negatively affect consumer confidence in the quality and value of our brands or negatively impact our competitive position, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We are also susceptible to increases in sourcing costs from our manufacturers which we may not be able to pass on to our customers and could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
13
Additionally, while we utilize third-party compliance auditors to visit and monitor the operations of our manufacturers, we do not have control of the independent manufacturers or their labor practices. As a result, the risk remains that one or more of our manufacturers will not adhere to our global compliance standards and violate labor laws or other laws, including consumer and product safety laws. Non-governmental organizations might attempt to create an unfavorable impression of our sourcing practices or the practices of some of our vendors or manufacturers that could harm our image. If either of these events occur, we could lose customer goodwill and favorable brand recognition.
The efficient operation of our stores and direct-to-consumer business depends on the timely receipt of merchandise from our distribution centers. We deliver our merchandise to our stores and direct-to-consumer customers using independent third parties. We utilize primarily one contract carrier to ship merchandise and related materials to our North American stores and direct-to-consumer customers, and a separate contract carrier for our European and Asian stores and direct-to-consumer customers. The independent third parties employ personnel that may be represented by labor unions. Disruptions in the delivery of merchandise or work stoppages by associates or contractors of any of these third parties could delay the timely receipt of merchandise. There can be no assurance that such stoppages or disruptions will not occur in the future. Any failure by a third party to respond adequately to our distribution needs would disrupt our operations and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Furthermore, we are susceptible to increases in fuel costs which may increase the cost of distribution. If we are not able to pass this cost on to our customers, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our reliance on two distribution centers domestically and two third-party distribution centers internationally makes us susceptible to disruptions or adverse conditions affecting our distribution centers.
Our two distribution centers located in New Albany, Ohio, manage the receipt, storage, sorting, packing and distribution of merchandise to our North American stores and to our North American and Asian direct-to-consumer customers. We also use a third-party distribution center in the Netherlands to manage the receipt, storage, sorting, packing and distribution of merchandise delivered to our stores and direct-to-consumer customers in Europe and a third-party distribution center in Hong Kong to manage receipt, storage, sorting, packing and distribution of merchandise delivered to our stores in Asia. As a result, our operations are susceptible to local and regional factors, such as system failures, accidents, economic and weather conditions, natural disasters, demographic and population changes, as well as other unforeseen events and circumstances. If our distribution operations were disrupted, our ability to replace inventory in our stores and process direct-to-consumer orders could be interrupted and sales could be negatively impacted.
We may be exposed to risks and costs associated with credit card fraud and identity theft that would cause us to incur unexpected expenses and loss of revenues.
A significant portion of our customer orders are placed through our websites. In addition, a significant portion of sales made through our retail stores requires the collection of certain customer data, such as credit card information. In order for our sales channels to function and develop successfully, we and other parties involved in processing customer transactions must be able to transmit confidential information, including credit card information, securely over public networks. Third parties may have the technology or knowledge to breach the security of customer transaction data. Although we have security measures related to our systems and the privacy of our customers, we cannot guarantee these measures will effectively prevent others from obtaining unauthorized access to our information and our customers’ information. Any person who circumvents our security measures could destroy or steal valuable information or disrupt our operations. While one has not occurred, a security breach could cause customers to lose confidence in the security of our websites or stores and choose not to purchase from us. Any security breach could also expose us to risks of data loss, litigation and liability, and could seriously disrupt operations and harm our reputation, any of which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, state, federal and foreign governments are increasingly enacting laws and regulations to protect consumers against identity theft. These laws and regulations will likely increase the costs of doing business and if we fail to implement appropriate security measures, or to detect and provide prompt notice of unauthorized access as required by some of these laws and regulations, we could be subject to potential claims for damages and other remedies, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our facilities, systems and stores, as well as the facilities and systems of our vendors and manufacturers, are vulnerable to natural disasters, pandemic disease and other unexpected events, any of which could result in an interruption to our business and adversely affect our operating results.
Our retail stores, corporate offices, distribution centers, infrastructure projects and direct-to-consumer operations, as well as the operations of our vendors and manufacturers, are vulnerable to damage from natural disasters, pandemic disease and other unexpected events. If any of these events result in damage to our facilities, systems or stores, or the facilities or systems of our vendors or manufacturers, we may experience interruptions in our business until the damage is repaired, resulting in the potential loss of customers and revenues. In addition, we may incur costs in repairing any damage which exceeds our applicable insurance coverage.
14
Our business is also vulnerable to any interruption related to an outbreak of a pandemic disease in countries where we have retail locations or source our merchandise.
Our litigation exposure could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are involved, from time-to-time, in litigation incidental to our business, such as litigation regarding overtime compensation and other employment or wage and hour related matters. Our current exposure could change in the event of the discovery of damaging facts with respect to legal matters pending against us or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of fact that are not in accordance with management’s evaluation of the claims. Should management’s evaluation prove incorrect, our exposure could greatly exceed expectations and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Our inability or failure to adequately protect our trademarks could have a negative impact on our brand image and limit our ability to penetrate new markets.
We believe our core trademarks, Abercrombie & Fitch
®
, abercrombie
®
, Hollister
®
, Gilly Hicks
®
and the “Moose” and “Seagull” logos, are an essential element of our strategy. We have obtained or applied for federal registration of these trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the registries of countries where stores are located or likely to be located in the future. In addition, we own registrations and have pending applications for other trademarks in the U.S. and have applied for or obtained registrations from the registries in many foreign countries in which our stores or our manufacturers are located. There can be no assurance that we will obtain registrations that have been applied for or that the registrations we obtain will prevent the imitation of our products or infringement of our intellectual property rights by others. If a third party copies our products in a manner that projects lesser quality or carries a negative connotation, our brand image could be materially adversely affected.
Because we have not yet registered all of our trademarks in all categories, or in all foreign countries in which we source or offer our merchandise now, or may in the future, our international expansion and our merchandising of products using these marks could be limited. For example, we cannot ensure that others will not try to block the manufacture, export or sale of our products as a violation of their trademarks or other proprietary rights. The pending applications for international registration of various trademarks could be challenged or rejected in those countries because third parties of whom we are not currently aware have already registered similar marks in those countries. Accordingly, it may be possible, in those foreign countries where the status of various applications is pending or unclear, for a third-party owner of the national trademark registration for a similar mark to prohibit the manufacture, sale or exportation of branded goods in or from that country. If we are unable to reach an arrangement with any such party, our manufacturers may be unable to manufacture our products, and we may be unable to sell certain products in those countries. Our inability to register our trademarks or purchase or license the right to use our trademarks or logos in these jurisdictions could limit our ability to obtain supplies from, or manufacture in, less costly markets or penetrate new markets should our business plan include selling our merchandise in those non-U.S. jurisdictions.
We have an anti-counterfeiting program, under the auspices of the Abercrombie & Fitch Brand Protection Team, whose goal is to eliminate the supply of illegal pieces of our products. The Brand Protection Team interacts with investigators, customs officials and law enforcement entities throughout the world to combat the illegal use of our trademarks. Although brand security initiatives are in place, we cannot guarantee that our efforts against the counterfeiting of our brands will be successful.
Fluctuations in our tax obligations and effective tax rate may result in volatility in our operating results.
We are subject to income taxes in many U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. In addition, our products are subject to import and excise duties and/or sales, consumption or value-added taxes (or “VAT”) in many jurisdictions. We record tax expense based on our estimates of future payments, which include reserves for estimates of probable settlements of foreign and domestic tax audits. At any one time, many tax years are subject to audit by various taxing jurisdictions. The results of these audits and negotiations with taxing authorities may affect the ultimate settlement of these issues. As a result, we expect that throughout the year there could be ongoing variability in our quarterly tax rates as taxable events occur and exposures are evaluated. In addition, our effective tax rate in any given financial statement period may be materially impacted by changes in the mix and level of earnings or by changes to existing accounting rules or regulations. Fluctuations in duties could also have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In some international markets, we are required to hold and submit VAT to the appropriate local tax authorities. Failure to correctly calculate or submit the appropriate amounts could subject us to substantial fines and penalties that could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, tax legislation may be enacted in the future, domestically or abroad, that impacts our current or future tax structure and effective tax rate.
The effects of war or acts of terrorism could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
15
The continued threat of terrorism and the associated heightened security measures and military actions in response to acts of terrorism have disrupted commerce. Any further acts of terrorism or a future war may disrupt commerce and undermine consumer confidence, which could negatively impact our sales revenue by causing consumer spending and/or mall traffic to decline. Furthermore, an act of terrorism or war, or the threat thereof, or any other unforeseen interruption of commerce, could negatively impact our business by interfering with our ability to obtain merchandise from foreign manufacturers. Our inability to obtain merchandise from our foreign manufacturers or substitute other manufacturers, at similar costs and in a timely manner, could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Our inability to obtain commercial insurance at acceptable prices or our failure to adequately reserve for self-insured exposures might increase our expenses and adversely impact our financial results.
We believe that commercial insurance coverage is prudent for risk management in certain areas of our business. Insurance costs may increase substantially in the future and may be affected by natural catastrophes, fear of terrorism, financial irregularities and other fraud at publicly-held companies, intervention by the government or a decrease in the number of insurance carriers. In addition, the carriers with which we hold our policies may go out of business, or may be otherwise unable to fulfill their contractual obligations. Furthermore, for certain types or levels of risk, such as risks associated with earthquakes, hurricanes or terrorist attacks, we may determine that we cannot obtain commercial insurance at acceptable prices, if at all. Therefore, we may choose to forego or limit our purchase of relevant commercial insurance, choosing instead to self-insure one or more types or levels of risk. We are primarily self-insured for workers’ compensation and associate health benefits. If we suffer a substantial loss that is not covered by commercial insurance or our self-insurance reserves, the loss and attendant expenses could harm our business and operating results. In addition, exposures could exist for which no insurance may be available and for which we have not reserved.
Operating results and cash flows at the store level may cause us to incur impairment charges.
Long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, are reviewed at the store level at least annually for impairment, or whenever changes in circumstances indicate that a full recovery of net asset values through future cash flows is in question. The review could result in significant charges related to underperforming stores which could impact our results of operations.
Furthermore, our impairment review requires us to make estimates and projections regarding, but not limited to, future cash flows. We make certain estimates and projections in connection with impairment analyses for our store locations and other property and equipment. If these estimates or projections change or prove incorrect, we may be, and have been, required to record impairment charges on certain store locations and other property and equipment. We have recognized significant impairment charges in the past and may do so in the future.
We are subject to customs, advertising, consumer protection, privacy, zoning and occupancy and labor and employment laws that could require us to modify our current business practices, incur increased costs or harm our reputation if we do not comply.
We are subject to numerous laws and regulations, including customs, truth-in-advertising, consumer protection, general privacy, health information privacy, identity theft, online privacy, unsolicited commercial communication and zoning and occupancy laws and ordinances that regulate retailers generally and/or govern the importation, promotion and sale of merchandise and the operation of retail stores, direct-to-consumer operations and distribution centers. As our business becomes more international in scope and we enter more countries internationally, the number of laws and regulations that we are subject to, as well as their scope and reach, increase significantly and heighten our risks. If these laws and regulations were to change, or were violated by our management, associates, suppliers, vendors or other parties with whom we do business, the costs of certain merchandise could increase, or we could experience delays in shipments of our merchandise, be subject to fines or penalties, or suffer reputational harm, which could reduce demand for our merchandise and adversely affect our business and results of operations. Failure to protect personally identifiable information of our customers or associates could subject us to considerable reputational harm, as well as significant fines, penalties and sanctions both domestically and abroad. In addition, changes in federal, state and international minimum wage laws and other laws relating to associate benefits could cause us to incur additional wage and benefits costs, which could hurt our profitability. We are also subject to U.S. securities laws and regulations, as well as stock exchange rules which could subject us to enforcement actions, de-listing and adverse legal sanctions for non-compliance.
Changes in the regulatory or compliance landscape could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Laws and regulations at the state, federal and international levels frequently change, and the ultimate cost of compliance cannot be precisely estimated. In addition, we cannot predict the impact that may result from changes in the regulatory landscape. Any changes in regulations, the imposition of additional regulations, or the enactment of any new or more stringent legislation including those related to health care, taxes, transportation and logistics, privacy, environmental issues, trade, product safety or employment and labor, could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
16
Our unsecured Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) and our Term Loan Agreement include financial and other covenants that impose restrictions on our financial and business operations.
Our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement expires on July 27, 2016 and our Term Loan Agreement has a maturity date of February 23, 2017. Market conditions could potentially impact the size and terms of a replacement facility or facilities.
Both our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and our Term Loan Agreement contain financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. If we fail to comply with the covenants and are unable to obtain a waiver or amendment, an event of default would result, and the lenders could declare outstanding borrowings immediately due and payable. If that should occur, we cannot guarantee that we would have sufficient liquidity at that time to repay or refinance borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and/or the Term Loan Agreement.
The inability to obtain credit on commercially reasonable terms, or a default under the current Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and/or the Amended Term Loan Agreement, could adversely impact our liquidity and results of operations.
Compliance with changing regulations and standards for accounting, corporate governance and public disclosure could adversely affect our business, results of operations and reported financial results.
Changing regulatory requirements for corporate governance and public disclosure, including SEC regulations and the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s accounting standards requirements are creating additional complexities for public companies. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act contains provisions governing “conflict minerals,” certain minerals originating from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. As a result, the SEC adopted annual disclosure and reporting requirements for those companies who use conflict minerals mined in the named countries. There will be costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, including diligence to determine the sources of minerals used in our products and possible changes to sources of our inputs.
Stockholder activism, the current political environment, financial reform legislation and the current high level of government intervention and regulatory reform may lead to substantial new regulations and disclosure obligations. In addition, the expected future requirement to transition to, or converge with, international financial reporting standards is creating uncertainty and additional complexities. These changing regulatory requirements may lead to additional compliance costs, as well as the diversion of our management’s time and attention from strategic business activities and could have a significant effect on our reported results for the affected periods.
17
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
|
None.
18
|
ITEM 2.
|
PROPERTIES.
|
The Company’s headquarters and support functions occupy 491 acres, consisting of the home office, distribution and shipping facilities centralized on a campus-like setting in New Albany, Ohio and an additional small distribution and shipping facility located in the Columbus, Ohio area, all of which are owned by the Company. Additionally, the Company leases small facilities to house its design and sourcing support centers in Hong Kong, New York City and Los Angeles, California, as well as offices in the United Kingdom, Japan, Switzerland, Italy, Hong Kong and China.
All of the retail stores operated by the Company, as of
March 22, 2013, a
re located in leased facilities, primarily in shopping centers. The leases expire at various dates, between 2013 and 2031.
The Company’s home office, distribution and shipping facilities, design support centers and stores are currently suitable and adequate.
As of
March 22, 2013,
the Company’s
1,053 stor
es were located as follows:
|
U.S. & U.S. Territories:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Alabama
|
5
|
|
Kentucky
|
9
|
|
North Dakota
|
1
|
|
|||||
|
Alaska
|
1
|
|
Louisiana
|
8
|
|
Ohio
|
31
|
|
|||||
|
Arizona
|
16
|
|
Maine
|
4
|
|
Oklahoma
|
7
|
|
|||||
|
Arkansas
|
6
|
|
Maryland
|
19
|
|
Oregon
|
10
|
|
|||||
|
California
|
130
|
|
Massachusetts
|
33
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
44
|
|
|||||
|
Colorado
|
8
|
|
Michigan
|
25
|
|
Rhode Island
|
3
|
|
|||||
|
Connecticut
|
20
|
|
Minnesota
|
15
|
|
South Carolina
|
10
|
|
|||||
|
Delaware
|
5
|
|
Mississippi
|
2
|
|
South Dakota
|
1
|
|
|||||
|
District Of Columbia
|
1
|
|
Missouri
|
11
|
|
Tennessee
|
20
|
|
|||||
|
Florida
|
74
|
|
Montana
|
2
|
|
Texas
|
84
|
|
|||||
|
Georgia
|
21
|
|
Nebraska
|
3
|
|
Utah
|
7
|
|
|||||
|
Hawaii
|
5
|
|
Nevada
|
11
|
|
Vermont
|
2
|
|
|||||
|
Idaho
|
3
|
|
New Hampshire
|
10
|
|
Virginia
|
23
|
|
|||||
|
Illinois
|
41
|
|
New Jersey
|
39
|
|
Washington
|
19
|
|
|||||
|
Indiana
|
18
|
|
New Mexico
|
3
|
|
West Virginia
|
4
|
|
|||||
|
Iowa
|
7
|
|
New York
|
50
|
|
Wisconsin
|
11
|
|
|||||
|
Kansas
|
5
|
|
North Carolina
|
24
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
1
|
|
|||||
|
International Stores:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Austria
|
6
|
|
Germany
|
23
|
|
Poland
|
1
|
|
|||||
|
Belgium
|
3
|
|
Hong Kong
|
3
|
|
Republic of Korea
|
2
|
|
|||||
|
Canada
|
19
|
|
Ireland
|
2
|
|
Singapore
|
1
|
|
|||||
|
China
|
4
|
|
Italy
|
10
|
|
Spain
|
13
|
|
|||||
|
Denmark
|
1
|
|
Japan
|
2
|
|
Sweden
|
3
|
|
|||||
|
France
|
9
|
|
Netherlands
|
2
|
|
United Kingdom
|
37
|
|
|||||
19
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
.
|
A&F is a defendant in lawsuits and other adversary proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Legal costs incurred in connection with the resolution of claims and lawsuits are generally expensed as incurred, and the Company establishes reserves for the outcome of litigation where it deems appropriate to do so under applicable accounting rules. The Company’s assessment of the current exposure could change in the event of the discovery of additional facts with respect to legal matters pending against the Company or determinations by judges, juries, administrative agencies or other finders of fact that are not in accordance with the Company’s evaluation of claims. Actual liabilities may exceed the amounts reserved, and there can be no assurance that final resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company has established accruals for certain matters where losses are deemed probable and reasonably estimable. There are other claims and legal proceedings pending against the Company for which accruals have not been established.
20
|
ITEM 4.
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
.
|
Not applicable.
21
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM.
|
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
|
Set forth below is certain information regarding the executive officers of A&F as of March 22, 2013:
Michael S. Jeffries, 68, has been Chairman of A&F since May 1998. Mr. Jeffries has been Chief Executive Officer of A&F since February 1992. From February 1992 to May 1998, Mr. Jeffries held the title of President of A&F. Under the terms of the Employment Agreement, entered into as of December 19, 2008, between A&F and Mr. Jeffries, A&F is obligated to cause Mr. Jeffries to be nominated as a director of A&F during his employment term.
Diane Chang, 57, has been Executive Vice President — Sourcing of A&F since May 2004. Prior thereto, Ms. Chang held the position of Senior Vice President — Sourcing of A&F from February 2000 to May 2004 and the position of Vice President — Sourcing of A&F from May 1998 to February 2000.
Leslee K. Herro, 52, has been Executive Vice President — Planning and Allocation of A&F since May 2004. Prior thereto, Ms. Herro held the position of Senior Vice President — Planning and Allocation of A&F from February 2000 to May 2004 and the position of Vice President — Planning & Allocation of A&F from February 1994 to February 2000.
Jonathan E. Ramsden, 48, has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of A&F since December 2008. From December 1998 to December 2008, Mr. Ramsden served as Chief Financial Officer and a member of the Executive Committee of TBWA Worldwide, a large advertising agency network and a division of Omnicom Group Inc. Prior to becoming Chief Financial Officer of TWBA Worldwide, he served as Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Omnicom Group Inc. from June 1996 to December 1998.
Ronald A. Robins, Jr., 49, has been Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of A&F since August 2010. Mr. Robins joined A&F in November 2009 as Deputy General Counsel after spending 16 years at Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, 13 years as a partner in the firm’s corporate and finance practice group. Mr. Robins clerked for The Honorable Milton Pollack of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York from 1989 to 1990. Before joining Vorys, Mr. Robins practiced for several years as an associate at Davis Polk & Wardwell in New York City.
Amy Zehrer, 43, has been Executive Vice President — Stores of A&F since February 2013. Prior thereto, Ms. Zehrer held the position of Senior Vice President — Stores of A&F from November 2007 to February 2013 and the position of Vice President — Stores of A&F from August 2006 to November 2007. Ms. Zehrer has been with A&F since 1992 playing an integral part in evolving the brands and the success of the Company's international expansion.
The executive officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors of A&F and, in the case of Mr. Jeffries, pursuant to an employment agreement.
22
PART II
|
ITEM 5
.
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
|
A&F’s Class A Common Stock (the “Common Stock”) is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ANF.” The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices of A&F’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange for Fiscal
2012
and Fiscal
2011
:
|
|
Sales Price
|
|||||||
|
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
|
Fiscal 2012
|
||||||||
|
4th Quarter
|
$
|
51.07
|
|
$
|
30.58
|
|
||
|
3rd Quarter
|
$
|
39.36
|
|
$
|
29.06
|
|
||
|
2nd Quarter
|
$
|
53.29
|
|
$
|
29.78
|
|
||
|
1st Quarter
|
$
|
53.53
|
|
$
|
40.40
|
|
||
|
Fiscal 2011
|
||||||||
|
4th Quarter
|
$
|
76.33
|
|
$
|
43.56
|
|
||
|
3rd Quarter
|
$
|
77.49
|
|
$
|
55.70
|
|
||
|
2nd Quarter
|
$
|
78.25
|
|
$
|
62.46
|
|
||
|
1st Quarter
|
$
|
72.61
|
|
$
|
48.40
|
|
||
A quarterly dividend, of $0.175 per share, was paid in each of March, June, September and December in Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011. A&F increased the quarterly dividend to $0.20 per share beginning with the first quarter of Fiscal 2013. A&F expects to continue to pay a quarterly dividend, subject to the Board of Directors’ review of the Company’s cash position and results of operations.
As of March 22, 2013, there were approximately 4,230 stockholders of record. However, when including investors holding shares in broker accounts under street name, active associates of the Company who participate in A&F’s stock purchase plan, and associates of the Company who own shares through A&F-sponsored retirement plans, A&F estimates that there are approximately 38,700 stockholders.
The following table provides information regarding the purchase of shares of the Common Stock of A&F made by or on behalf of A&F or any “affiliated purchaser” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, during each fiscal month of the quarterly period ended
February 2, 2013
:
|
Period (Fiscal Month)
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
(1)
|
Average
Price Paid
per Share
(2)
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
(3)
|
Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet
be Purchased under
the Plans or
Programs
(4)
|
|||||||||
|
October 28, 2012 through November 24, 2012
|
3,355
|
|
$
|
36.89
|
|
—
|
|
19,893,742
|
|
||||
|
November 25, 2012 through December 29, 2012
|
1,181,438
|
|
$
|
45.89
|
|
1,175,023
|
|
18,718,719
|
|
||||
|
December 30, 2012 through February 2, 2013
|
48,710
|
|
$
|
45.01
|
|
47,671
|
|
18,671,048
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
1,233,503
|
|
$
|
45.83
|
|
1,222,694
|
|
18,671,048
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
An aggregate of 10,809 of the shares of A&F’s Common Stock purchased during the fourteen-week period ended
February 2, 2013
, represented shares which were withheld for tax payments due upon the vesting of employee restricted stock unit and restricted share awards and upon the exercise of employee stock appreciation rights.
|
|
(2)
|
The average price paid per share includes broker commissions, as applicable.
|
|
(3)
|
The reported shares were repurchased pursuant to A&F’s publicly announced stock repurchase authorizations. On May 15, 2012, A&F’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an aggregate of 10.0 million shares of A&F’s Common Stock. On August 14, 2012, A&F's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 10.0 million shares of A&F’s Common Stock.
|
|
(4)
|
The number shown represents, as of the end of each period, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may yet be purchased under A&F’s publicly announced stock repurchase authorization described in footnote 3 above. The shares may be purchased, from time-to-time, depending on market conditions.
|
During Fiscal
2012
, A&F repurchased approximately 7.5 million shares of A&F’s Common Stock in the open market with a cost of approximately $321.7 million. During Fiscal
2011
, A&F repurchased approximately 3.5 million shares of A&F’s
23
Common Stock in the open market with a cost of approximately $196.6 million. Both the Fiscal
2012
and the Fiscal
2011
repurchases were pursuant to authorizations of A&F’s Board of Directors.
24
The following graph shows the changes, over the five-year period ended
February 2, 2013
(the last day of A&F’s Fiscal
2012
) in the value of $100 invested in (i) shares of A&F’s Common Stock; (ii) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (the “S&P 500 Index”) and (iii) the Standard & Poor’s Apparel Retail Composite Index (the “S&P Apparel Retail Index”), including reinvestment of dividends. The plotted points represent the closing price on the last trading day of the fiscal year indicated.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
(1
)
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Abercrombie & Fitch Co., the S&P 500 Index
and the S&P Apparel Retail Index
* $100 invested on 2/2/08 in stock or 1/31/08 in index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Indexes calculated on month-end basis.
Copyright
©
2013 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
(1)
This graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to SEC Regulation 14A or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), except to the extent that A&F specifically requests that the graph be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates it by reference into a filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
25
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
.
|
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(Thousands, except per share and per square foot amounts, ratios and store and associate data)
(Information below excludes amounts related to discontinued operations, except where otherwise noted)
|
|
2012
(1)
|
Restated 2011
(2)
|
Restated 2010
(2)
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net Sales
|
$
|
4,510,805
|
|
$
|
4,158,058
|
|
$
|
3,468,777
|
|
$
|
2,928,626
|
|
$
|
3,484,058
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Profit
|
$
|
2,816,709
|
|
$
|
2,550,224
|
|
$
|
2,217,429
|
|
$
|
1,883,598
|
|
$
|
2,331,095
|
|
|||||
|
Operating Income
|
$
|
374,233
|
|
$
|
221,384
|
|
$
|
237,180
|
|
$
|
117,912
|
|
$
|
498,262
|
|
|||||
|
Net Income from Continuing Operations
|
$
|
237,011
|
|
$
|
143,138
|
|
$
|
155,709
|
|
$
|
78,953
|
|
$
|
308,169
|
|
|||||
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
(3)
|
—
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(78,699
|
)
|
$
|
(35,914
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net Income
(3)
|
$
|
237,011
|
|
$
|
143,934
|
|
$
|
155,709
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
$
|
272,255
|
|
|||||
|
Dividends Declared Per Share
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|||||
|
Net Income Per Share from Continuing Operations
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
2.89
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
$
|
3.45
|
|
|||||
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share from Discontinued Operations
(3)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(0.90
|
)
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net Income Per Share
(3)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
2.89
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
3.14
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
3.05
|
|
|||||
|
Basic Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding
|
81,940
|
|
86,848
|
|
88,061
|
|
87,874
|
|
86,816
|
|
||||||||||
|
Diluted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding
|
83,175
|
|
89,537
|
|
89,851
|
|
88,609
|
|
89,291
|
|
||||||||||
|
Other Financial Information
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Assets (including discontinued operations)
|
$
|
2,987,401
|
|
$
|
3,117,032
|
|
$
|
2,994,022
|
|
$
|
2,821,866
|
|
$
|
2,848,181
|
|
|||||
|
Working Capital
(4)
|
$
|
617,023
|
|
$
|
858,248
|
|
$
|
927,024
|
|
$
|
776,311
|
|
$
|
622,213
|
|
|||||
|
Current Ratio
(5)
|
1.89
|
|
2.23
|
|
2.68
|
|
2.73
|
|
2.38
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
(3)
|
$
|
684,171
|
|
$
|
365,219
|
|
$
|
391,789
|
|
$
|
395,487
|
|
$
|
491,031
|
|
|||||
|
Capital Expenditures
|
$
|
339,862
|
|
$
|
318,598
|
|
$
|
160,935
|
|
$
|
175,472
|
|
$
|
367,602
|
|
|||||
|
Free Cash Flow
(6)
|
$
|
344,309
|
|
$
|
46,621
|
|
$
|
230,854
|
|
$
|
220,015
|
|
$
|
123,429
|
|
|||||
|
Borrowings
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
43,805
|
|
$
|
50,927
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Leasehold Financing Obligations
|
$
|
63,942
|
|
$
|
57,851
|
|
$
|
24,761
|
|
$
|
20,286
|
|
$
|
5,881
|
|
|||||
|
Stockholders’ Equity (including discontinued operations)
|
$
|
1,818,268
|
|
$
|
1,931,335
|
|
$
|
1,943,391
|
|
$
|
1,827,917
|
|
$
|
1,845,578
|
|
|||||
|
Return on Average Stockholders’ Equity
(7)
|
13
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
0
|
%
|
16
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Comparable Sales
(8)
|
(1
|
)%
|
5
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
(23
|
)%
|
(13
|
)%
|
||||||||||
|
Net Store Sales Per Average Gross Square Foot
|
$
|
485
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
$
|
339
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
|||||
|
Stores at End of Year and Average Associates
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Number of Stores Open
|
1,051
|
|
1,045
|
|
1,069
|
|
1,096
|
|
1,097
|
|
||||||||||
|
Gross Square Feet
|
7,958
|
|
7,778
|
|
7,756
|
|
7,848
|
|
7,760
|
|
||||||||||
|
Average Number of Associates
(9)
|
95,800
|
|
91,000
|
|
83,000
|
|
83,000
|
|
96,200
|
|
||||||||||
|
(1)
|
Fiscal 2012 was a fifty-three week year.
|
|
(2)
|
Reported results for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010 have been restated to reflect the change in method of accounting for inventory effective in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012. Refer to Note 4, “
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE,
” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.
Reported results for periods prior to Fiscal 2010 have not been restated to reflect the change in accounting principle as the information is not available.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes results of operations from RUEHL branded stores and related direct-to-consumer operations. Results from discontinued operations were immaterial in Fiscal 2010.
|
|
(4)
|
Working Capital is computed by subtracting current liabilities (including discontinued operations) from current assets (including discontinued operations).
|
26
|
(5)
|
Current Ratio is computed by dividing current assets (including discontinued operations) by current liabilities (including discontinued operations).
|
|
(6)
|
Free Cash Flow is computed by subtracting capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities.
|
|
(7)
|
Return on Average Stockholders’ Equity is computed by dividing net income (including discontinued operations) by the average stockholders’ equity balance (including discontinued operations).
|
|
(8)
|
A store is included in comparable sales when it has been open as the same brand at least one year and its square footage has not been expanded or reduced by more than 20% within the past year. Beginning with Fiscal 2012, comparable sales include comparable direct-to-consumer sales. Prior year figures have not been restated and only include comparable store sales.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes employees from RUEHL operations.
|
27
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
|
OVERVIEW
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31, typically resulting in a fifty-two week year, but occasionally giving rise to an additional week, resulting in a fifty-three week year as was the case for Fiscal 2012. A store is included in comparable sales when it has been open as the same brand at least one year and its square footage has not been expanded or reduced by more than 20% within the past year. Additionally, beginning with Fiscal 2012, comparable direct-to-consumer sales were included in comparable sales.
For purposes of this “ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS,” the
fifty-three week period ended February 2, 2013
is compared to the
fifty-two week period ended January 28, 2012
and the
fifty-two week period ended January 28, 2012
is compared to the fifty-two week period ended
January 29, 2011
.
The Company has changed its method of accounting for inventory from the lower of cost or market utilizing the retail method to the weighted average cost method ("cost method") effective in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012. Results discussed in this "ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS," reflect the cost method of accounting for inventory. Refer to Note 4, "
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE,"
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in "ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA." All references to historical amounts reflect the effects of the change to the cost method.
The Company had net sales of
$4.511 billion
for Fiscal 2012, an increase of
8%
from
$4.158 billion
for Fiscal 2011. Operating income for Fiscal
2012
was
$374.2 million
, which increased 69% from the Fiscal 2011 operating income of
$221.4 million
.
Net income from continuing operations was
$237.0 million
and net income from continuing operations per diluted share was
$2.85
in Fiscal
2012
, compared to net income from continuing operations of
$143.1 million
and net income from continuing operations per diluted share of
$1.60
in Fiscal
2011
.
Excluding charges for impairments, the Company reported adjusted, non-GAAP net income per diluted share of $2.90 for the Fiscal 2012. Excluding charges for impairments and write-downs of store-related long-lived assets, charges related to store closures and lease exits, and other charges associated with legal settlements and a change in intent regarding the Company’s auction rate securities ("ARS"), the Company reported non-GAAP net income per diluted share of $2.49 for Fiscal 2011.
The Company believes that the non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors as they provide the ability to measure the Company’s operating performance and compare it against that of prior periods without reference to the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income impact of non-cash, store-related asset impairment charges, charges related to store closures and lease exits, and other charges associated with legal settlements and a change in intent regarding the Company's ARS. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be used as alternatives to net income per diluted share or as indicators of the ongoing operating performance of the Company and are also not intended to supersede or replace the Company’s GAAP financial measures. The table below reconciles the GAAP financial measures to the non-GAAP financial measures discussed above.
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
Fiscal 2011
|
||||||
|
|
February 2, 2013
|
January 28, 2012
|
||||||
|
Net income per diluted share on a GAAP basis
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
||
|
Add back: Asset impairment charges
(1)
|
0.06
|
|
0.49
|
|
||||
|
Add back: Asset write-downs
(2)
|
—
|
|
0.10
|
|
||||
|
Add back: Store closure and lease exit charges
(3)
|
—
|
|
0.13
|
|
||||
|
Add back: Legal charges
(4)
|
—
|
|
0.07
|
|
||||
|
Add back: ARS charges
(5)
|
—
|
|
0.09
|
|
||||
|
Net income per diluted share on a non-GAAP basis
|
$
|
2.90
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
The store-related asset impairment charges relate to stores whose asset carrying value exceeded their fair value. For Fiscal 2012, the charge was primarily associated with one Abercrombie & Fitch, three abercrombie kids, 12 Hollister and one Gilly Hicks store. For Fiscal 2011, the charge was associated with 14 Abercrombie & Fitch, 21 abercrombie kids, 42 Hollister and two Gilly Hicks stores.
|
|
(2)
|
For Fiscal 2011, the charge associated with the asset write-downs was related to the reconfiguration of three flagship stores and a small write-off related to a cancelled flagship project.
|
28
|
(3)
|
For Fiscal 2011, the charges for store closures and lease exits were associated with lease buyouts and other lease obligations related to stores closing prior to natural lease expirations, other lease terminations, and other incidental costs associated with store closures.
|
|
(4)
|
For Fiscal 2011, the charge was related to legal settlements during the fourth quarter.
|
|
(5)
|
For Fiscal 2011, the charge associated with the ARS was related to a change in intent with regard to the Company’s auction rate securities portfolio, which resulted in recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment.
|
Net cash provided by operating activities, the Company’s primary source of liquidity, was
$684.2 million
for Fiscal
2012
. This source of cash was primarily driven by a change in inventories partially offset by a change in accounts payable. The Company used
$339.9 million
of cash for capital expenditures partially offset by cash proceeds of $102.0 million from the sale of marketable securities. The Company also repurchased $321.7 million of Common Stock and paid dividends totaling $57.6 million. As of
February 2, 2013
, the Company had
$643.5 million
in cash and equivalents, no outstanding debt aside from that related to landlord financing obligations, and immaterial stand-by letters of credit.
The following data represents the amounts shown in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the last three fiscal years, expressed as a percentage of net sales:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||
|
NET SALES
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
|||
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
37.6
|
38.7
|
36.1
|
|||
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
62.4
|
61.3
|
63.9
|
|||
|
Stores and Distribution Expense
|
44.1
|
45.4
|
45.8
|
|||
|
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense
|
10.5
|
10.5
|
11.6
|
|||
|
Other Operating Expense (Income), Net
|
(0.4)
|
0.1
|
(0.3)
|
|||
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
8.3
|
5.3
|
6.8
|
|||
|
Interest Expense, Net
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
|||
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES
|
8.1
|
5.2
|
6.7
|
|||
|
Tax Expense from Continuing Operations
|
2.9
|
1.8
|
2.3
|
|||
|
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
5.3
|
3.4
|
4.5
|
|||
|
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, Net of Taxes
|
—
|
0.0
|
—
|
|||
|
NET INCOME
|
5.3%
|
3.5%
|
4.5%
|
|||
29
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The following summarized financial and statistical data compares Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Net sales by segment (in thousands)
|
$
|
4,510,805
|
|
$
|
4,158,058
|
|
$
|
3,468,777
|
|
|||
|
U.S. Stores
|
$
|
2,615,138
|
|
$
|
2,710,842
|
|
$
|
2,546,798
|
|
|||
|
International Stores
|
$
|
1,195,016
|
|
$
|
894,616
|
|
$
|
517,005
|
|
|||
|
Direct-to-consumer
|
$
|
700,651
|
|
$
|
552,600
|
|
$
|
404,974
|
|
|||
|
Net sales as a % of total sales
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
U.S. Stores
|
58
|
%
|
65
|
%
|
73
|
%
|
||||||
|
International Stores
|
26
|
%
|
22
|
%
|
15
|
%
|
||||||
|
Direct-to-consumer
|
16
|
%
|
13
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net sales by brand (in thousands)
|
$
|
4,510,805
|
|
$
|
4,158,058
|
|
$
|
3,468,777
|
|
|||
|
Abercrombie & Fitch
|
$
|
1,704,190
|
|
$
|
1,665,135
|
|
$
|
1,493,101
|
|
|||
|
abercrombie
|
$
|
382,509
|
|
$
|
397,904
|
|
$
|
382,579
|
|
|||
|
Hollister
|
$
|
2,314,462
|
|
$
|
2,022,002
|
|
$
|
1,552,814
|
|
|||
|
Gilly Hicks**
|
$
|
109,644
|
|
$
|
73,017
|
|
$
|
40,283
|
|
|||
|
Increase (decrease) in comparable sales*
|
(1
|
)%
|
5
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
||||||
|
Abercrombie & Fitch
|
(3
|
)%
|
3
|
%
|
9
|
%
|
||||||
|
abercrombie
|
0
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Hollister
|
(1
|
)%
|
8
|
%
|
6
|
%
|
||||||
|
U.S.
|
1
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
International
|
(8
|
)%
|
||||||||||
|
Stores
|
(5
|
)%
|
5
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
||||||
|
Direct-to-Consumer
|
24
|
%
|
36
|
%
|
40
|
%
|
||||||
|
*
|
Beginning with 2012, comparable sales were reported including comparable direct-to-consumer sales. Prior year figures were not restated. A store is included in comparable sales when it has been open as the same brand 12 months or more and its square footage has not been expanded or reduced by more than 20% within the past year. The Fiscal 2012 retail year included a fifty-third week and, therefore, Fiscal 2012 comparable sales are compared to the fifty-three week period ended February 4, 2012.
|
|
**
|
Net sales for the year-to-date periods ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011 reflect the activity of 27, 21 and 19 stores, respectively.
|
30
CURRENT TRENDS AND OUTLOOK
Our results for Fiscal 2012 included an 8% increase in net sales and a 78% increase in diluted earnings per share compared to last year.
We have made progress in our operating income the past couple of years, including improvement in gross margin in Fiscal 2012 driven by a reduction in average unit cost. However, our operating margins remain well below historical levels, despite our highly profitable international business, which presents opportunities in two specific areas.
First, we will be revisiting our operating model and identifying processes and investments we make in our business that may have had a return in the past but no longer do today. We have established a cross-functional team to simplify processes, eliminate low value added components of our model, increase efficiencies and lower expenses.
Second, we will be seeking to identify ways to increase our average unit retail, particularly in the U.S. stores and U.S. direct-to-consumer operations. Growth in our average unit retail will help our gross margins and contribute to expense leverage.
Beyond the two initiatives above, our focus remains on key strategic initiatives with regard to merchandising, inventory productivity, expense and average unit cost, insight and intelligence, customer engagement and targeted closure of under-performing U.S. stores. We are confident that our focus on these initiatives, allied with our iconic brands and continued judicious use of shareholder capital, will drive significant long-term value.
With regard to real estate plans for Fiscal 2013, we expect to open Abercrombie & Fitch flagship locations in Seoul and Shanghai and approximately 20 international Hollister stores. The Hollister openings will include our first stores in Australia, our first store in the Middle East in Dubai through a joint venture and entry into the Japanese market for Hollister. Additionally, we are contemplating opening international mall-based Abercrombie & Fitch stores within the next 12 months. We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $200 million for the year, with estimated store pre-opening costs of around $30 million.
We are confident that we are on track in regard to our long-term strategy of leveraging the international appeal of our brands to build a highly profitable, sustainable, global business.
We continue to target annual EPS growth of approximately 15%. As in the past, our earnings are sensitive to changes in comparable sales trends.
Our capital allocation philosophy continues to be highly disciplined in allocating capital to where it will derive the greatest return on a risk-adjusted basis. After allocating capital to new stores and other internal projects that provide superior returns, we continue to expect to return excess cash to shareholders.
31
The following measurements are among the key business indicators reviewed by various members of management to gauge the Company’s results:
|
•
|
Comparable sales, defined as year-over-year sales for a store that has been open as the same brand at least one year and its square footage has not been expanded or reduced by more than 20% within the past year combined with direct to consumer sales;
|
|
•
|
Direct-to-consumer sales growth;
|
|
•
|
U.S. and International store performance;
|
|
•
|
Store productivity;
|
|
•
|
Selling margin, defined as sales price less original cost, by brand and by product category;
|
|
•
|
Stores and distribution expense as a percentage of net sales;
|
|
•
|
Marketing, general and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales;
|
|
•
|
Operating income and operating income as a percentage of net sales;
|
|
•
|
Net income;
|
|
•
|
Inventory per gross square foot;
|
|
•
|
Cash flow and liquidity determined by the Company’s current ratio and free cash flow; and
|
|
•
|
Store metrics such as sales per gross square foot, sales per selling square foot, average unit retail, average number of transactions per store, average transaction values, store contribution (defined as store sales less direct costs of operating the store), and average units per transaction.
|
While not all of these metrics are disclosed publicly by the Company due to the proprietary nature of the information, the Company publicly discloses and discusses many of these metrics as part of its “Financial Summary” and in several sections within this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
FISCAL
2012
COMPARED TO FISCAL
2011
Net Sales
Net sales for Fiscal
2012
were
$4.511 billion
, an increase of
8%
from Fiscal
2011
net sales of
$4.158 billion
. The net sales increase was attributable to new stores, primarily international and a 27% increase in the direct-to-consumer business, including shipping and handling revenue offset by a decrease of 5% from comparable store sales. The impact of foreign currency on sales (based on converting prior year sales at current year exchange rates) adversely affected Fiscal
2012
by $26.3 million and benefited Fiscal
2011
by $21.6 million.
The Fiscal 2012 retail year includes a fifty-third week and, therefore, Fiscal 2012 comparable sales are compared to the fifty-three week period ended February 4, 2012. The fifty-third week added approximately $62.8 million of sales to the comparable base, being sales for the week ended February 4, 2012.
Total U.S. sales, including direct-to-consumer, for Fiscal
2012
were $3.087 billion, a decrease of 1% from Fiscal
2011
sales of $3.108 billion. Total international sales, including direct-to-consumer, for Fiscal
2012
were $1.424 billion, an increase of 36% from Fiscal
2011
sales of $1.050 billion.
Direct-to-consumer sales in Fiscal
2012
, including shipping and handling revenue, were $700.7 million, an increase of 27% from Fiscal
2011
direct-to-consumer sales of $552.6 million. The direct-to-consumer business, including shipping and handling revenue, accounted for 16% of total net sales in Fiscal
2012
compared to 13% in Fiscal
2011
.
Total comparable sales for the year, including direct-to-consumer sales, decreased 1% with comparable store sales decreasing 5% and comparable direct-to-consumer sales increasing by 24%. Comparable sales for Fiscal 2012 increased 1% for the U.S., with comparable store sales decreasing by 1% and comparable direct-to-consumer sales up 15%. Comparable sales for the full year decreased 8% for international, with comparable store sales decreasing by 19% and comparable direct-to-consumer sales up 46%.
For Fiscal 2012, comparable sales by brand, including direct-to-consumer sales, decreased 3% for Abercrombie & Fitch, were flat for abercrombie kids, and decreased 1% for Hollister Co. Across the brands, male performed better than female.
From a merchandise classification standpoint, outerwear and jeans were stronger performing categories for the male business while polos and sport shirts were weaker performing categories. In the female business, woven shirts, sweaters, and knit tops were stronger performing categories, while fleece, sweatpants and graphics were weaker performing categories.
Gross Profit
32
Gross profit during Fiscal
2012
was
$2.817 billion
compared to gross profit of
$2.550 billion
during Fiscal
2011
. The gross profit rate (gross profit divided by net sales) for Fiscal
2012
was
62.4%
, up 110 basis points from the Fiscal
2011
rate of
61.3%
.
The increase in the gross profit rate for Fiscal
2012
was primarily driven by a decrease in average unit cost.
Stores and Distribution Expense
Stores and distribution expense for Fiscal
2012
was
$1.988 billion
compared to
$1.888 billion
in Fiscal
2011
. The stores and distribution expense rate (stores and distribution expense divided by net sales) for Fiscal
2012
was
44.1%
compared to
45.4%
in Fiscal
2011
.
Stores and distribution expense for Fiscal 2012 included store-related asset impairment charges of $7.4 million primarily associated with 17 stores. For Fiscal 2011, stores and distribution expense included store-related asset impairment charges of $68.0 million associated with 79 stores, asset write-down charges of $14.6 million related to the reconfiguration of three flagship stores and a small write-off related to a cancelled flagship project, and store exit charges of $19.0 million, associated with lease buyouts and other lease obligations related to stores closing prior to natural lease expirations, other lease terminations, and other incidental costs associated with store closures. Excluding the effect of these charges, the stores and distribution expense rate was 43.9% for Fiscal 2012 compared to 43.0% last year. The increase in stores and distribution expense rate for Fiscal
2012
was primarily the result of deleveraging on negative comparable store sales and higher direct-to-consumer expense.
Shipping and handling costs, including costs incurred to store, move and prepare merchandise for shipment and costs incurred to physically move the product to the customer, associated with direct-to-consumer operations were $78.6 million and $53.6 million for Fiscal
2012
and Fiscal
2011
, respectively. The increase in shipping and handling costs in Fiscal 2012 was primarily driven by increased sales volume and a higher international mix component. These amounts are recorded in Stores and Distribution Expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
Handling costs, including costs incurred to store, move and prepare merchandise for shipment to the stores were $59.4 million and $62.8 million for Fiscal
2012
and Fiscal
2011
, respectively. These amounts are recorded in Stores and Distribution Expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense
Marketing, general and administrative expense during Fiscal
2012
was
$473.9 million
compared to
$437.1 million
in Fiscal
2011
. The marketing, general and administrative expense rate (marketing, general and administrative expense divided by net sales) was
10.5%
in Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal
2011
. Marketing, general and administrative expense for Fiscal 2011 included $10.0 million in connection with legal settlements.
The increase in marketing, general, and administrative expenses was due to increases in incentive and other compensation related expenses, IT, marketing and other expenses.
Other Operating Expense (Income), Net
Other operating income, net was
$19.3 million
for Fiscal
2012
compared to other operating expense, net of
$3.5 million
for Fiscal
2011
. Other operating income, net for Fiscal 2012, included income of $4.8 million related to business interruption insurance recoveries associated with Superstorm Sandy. Other operating expense included a charge of $13.4 million related to the Company’s change of intent regarding the sale of its ARS portfolio, which resulted in recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment in Fiscal 2011.
Operating Income
Operating income for Fiscal 2012 was $374.2 million compared to operating income of $221.4 million for Fiscal 2011. Operating income growth by new international stores, existing U.S. stores and direct-to-consumer operations more than off-set declines in existing international stores driven by negative comparable store sales and higher non-four wall expenses. Non-four wall expenses include: marketing, general and administrative expense; store management and support functions such as regional and district management and other functions not dedicated to an individual store; and distribution center costs.
Interest Expense (Income), Net and Tax Expense
Fiscal
2012
interest expense was $10.5 million, offset by interest income of $3.2 million, compared to interest expense of $7.9 million, offset by interest income of $4.3 million for Fiscal
2011
.
The effective tax rate for Fiscal
2012
was 35.4% compared to 34.3% for Fiscal
2011
.
As of February 2, 2013, there were approximately $22.2 million of net deferred tax assets in Japan. The realization of the net deferred tax assets is dependent upon the future generation of sufficient taxable profits in Japan. While the Company
33
believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will be realized, it is not certain. Should circumstances change, the net deferred tax assets not currently subject to a valuation allowance may become subject to one in the future. Additional valuation allowances would result in additional tax expense.
Net Income and Net Income per Diluted Share
Net income for Fiscal
2012
was
$237.0 million
compared to net income of
$143.9 million
for Fiscal
2011
. Net income per diluted share for Fiscal
2012
was
$2.85
compared to net income per diluted share of
$1.61
for Fiscal
2011
. Net income per diluted share for Fiscal
2012
included store-related asset impairment charges of approximately $0.06 per diluted share. Net income per diluted share for Fiscal
2011
included store-related asset impairment charges of approximately $0.49 per diluted share, asset write-down charges of approximately $0.10 per diluted share, store closure and exit charges of approximately $0.13 per diluted share, legal charges of approximately $0.07 per diluted share, and other-than-temporary impairment charges of approximately $0.09 per diluted share related to a change in intent regarding the Company’s ARS portfolio. Refer to the GAAP reconciliation table in the “OVERVIEW” section of this “ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” for a reconciliation of net income per diluted share on a GAAP basis to net income per diluted share on a non-GAAP basis, excluding charges for impairment and write-downs of store related long-lived assets, charges related to store closures and lease exits, and other charges associated with legal settlements and with a change in intent regarding the Company’s ARS.
FISCAL
2011
COMPARED TO FISCAL
2010
Net Sales
Net sales for Fiscal
2011
were $4.158 billion, an increase of 20% from Fiscal
2010
net sales of $3.469 billion. The net sales increase was attributable to new stores, primarily international, a 5% increase in comparable store sales, and a 36% increase in the direct-to-consumer business, including shipping and handling revenue. The impact of foreign currency on sales (based on converting prior year sales at current year exchange rates) for Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal
2010
was a benefit of $21.6 million and $4.9 million, respectively.
Total Company U.S. store sales for Fiscal
2011
were $2.711 billion, an increase of 6% from Fiscal
2010
sales of $2.547 billion. Total Company international store sales for Fiscal
2011
were $894.6 million, an increase of 73% from Fiscal
2010
sales of $517.0 million.
Direct-to-consumer sales in Fiscal
2011
, including shipping and handling revenue, were $552.6 million, an increase of 36% from Fiscal
2010
direct-to-consumer sales of $405.0 million. The direct-to-consumer business, including shipping and handling revenue, accounted for 13% of total net sales in Fiscal
2011
compared to 12% in Fiscal
2010
.
Comparable store sales by brand for Fiscal
2011
were as follows: Abercrombie & Fitch increased 3%, with men’s and women’s increasing by a low single digit percent. abercrombie kids increased 4%, with guys increasing by a high single digit and girls increasing by a low single digit. Hollister increased 8%, with dudes and bettys increasing by a high single digit.
On a comparable store sales basis, the Southern and the Western regions of the U.S. were the strongest performing regions, while Canada and Japan were the weakest.
From a merchandise classification standpoint, fleece, active wear, and knit tops were stronger performing categories for the male business while graphics and woven shirts were weaker performing categories. In the female business, woven shirts, sweaters, and knit tops were stronger performing categories, while graphics and dresses were weaker performing categories.
Gross Profit
Gross profit during Fiscal
2011
was $2.550 billion compared to gross profit of $2.217 billion during Fiscal
2010
. The gross profit rate for Fiscal
2011
was 61.3%, down 260 basis points from the Fiscal
2010
rate of 63.9%.
The decrease in the gross profit rate for Fiscal
2011
was primarily driven by an increase in average unit cost.
Stores and Distribution Expense
Stores and distribution expense for Fiscal
2011
was $1.888 billion compared to $1.590 billion in Fiscal
2010
. The stores and distribution expense rate for Fiscal
2011
was 45.4% compared to 45.8% in Fiscal
2010
.
Stores and distribution expense for Fiscal 2011 included store-related asset impairment charges of $68.0 million associated with 79 stores, asset write-down charges of $14.6 million related to the reconfiguration of three flagship stores and a small write-off related to a cancelled flagship project, and store exit charges of $19.0 million, associated with lease buyouts and other lease obligations related to stores closing prior to natural lease expirations, other lease terminations, and other incidental costs associated with store closures. For Fiscal 2010, stores and distribution expense included store-related asset impairment
34
charges associated with 26 stores of $50.6 million and store exit charges of $4.4 million associated with the closure of 64 domestic stores during the year.
The decrease in stores and distribution expense rate for Fiscal
2011
was primarily driven by lower store occupancy costs as a percentage of net sales.
Shipping and handling costs, including costs incurred to store, move and prepare the products for shipment and costs incurred to physically move the product to the customer, associated with direct-to-consumer operations were $53.6 million and $38.9 million for Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal
2010
, respectively. Handling costs, including costs incurred to store, move and prepare the products for shipment to the stores were $62.8 million and $42.8 million for Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal
2010
, respectively. These amounts are recorded in Stores and Distribution Expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense
Marketing, general and administrative expense during Fiscal
2011
was $437.1 million compared to $400.8 million in Fiscal
2010
. For Fiscal
2011
, the marketing, general and administrative expense rate was 10.5%, compared to 11.6% for Fiscal
2010
. Marketing, general and administrative expense for Fiscal 2011 included $10.0 million in connection with legal settlements.
In addition to legal settlement charges, the increase in marketing, general and administrative expense for Fiscal
2011
was primarily due to increases in compensation, including equity compensation, outside services, marketing, travel and IT expenses.
Other Operating Expense (Income), Net
Other operating expense, net was $3.5 million for Fiscal
2011
compared to other operating income, net of $10.1 million for Fiscal
2010
. Other operating expense, net for Fiscal 2011, included $13.4 million of expense related to a change in the Company’s intent regarding the sale of its ARS portfolio, which resulted in recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment in Fiscal
2011
.
Interest Expense (Income), Net and Tax Expense
Fiscal
2011
interest expense was $7.9 million, offset by interest income of $4.3 million, compared to interest expense of $7.8 million, offset by interest income of $4.4 million for Fiscal
2010
.
The effective tax rate for Fiscal
2011
was 34.3% compared to 33.4% for Fiscal
2010
.
As of January 28, 2012, there were approximately $25.6 million of net deferred tax assets in Japan with a valuation allowance of $2.4 million. The valuation allowance in Japan was established as the result of changes to the business configuration of operations in Japan, as well as tax law changes. The realization of the net deferred tax assets not subject to a valuation allowance is dependent upon the future generation of sufficient profits in Japan. While the Company believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will be realized, it is not certain. Should circumstances change, some or all of the net deferred tax assets not currently subject to a valuation allowance may become so in the future. Any increase in the valuation allowance would result in additional tax expense.
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
The Company completed the closure of its RUEHL branded stores and related direct-to-consumer operations in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2009. Accordingly, the after-tax operating results appear in Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. Results from discontinued operations, net of tax, were immaterial for Fiscal 2010.
Refer to Note 19, “
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS,
” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.
Net Income and Net Income per Diluted Share
Net income for Fiscal
2011
was $143.9 million compared to $155.7 million for Fiscal
2010
. Net income per diluted share for Fiscal
2011
was $1.61 compared to $1.73 for Fiscal
2010
. Net income per diluted share for Fiscal
2011
included store-related asset impairment charges of approximately $0.49 per diluted share, asset write-down charges of approximately $0.10 per diluted share, store closure and exit charges of approximately $0.13 per diluted share, legal charges of approximately $0.07 per diluted share, and other-than-temporary impairment charges of approximately $0.09 per diluted share related to a change in intent regarding the Company’s ARS portfolio. Net income per diluted share for Fiscal
2010
included store-related asset impairment charges of approximately $0.34 per diluted share and store exit charges of approximately $0.03 per diluted share.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
35
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historical Sources and Uses of Cash
Seasonality of Cash Flows
The retail business has two principal selling seasons: the Spring season which includes the first and second fiscal quarters (“Spring”) and the Fall season which includes the third and fourth fiscal quarters (“Fall”). As is typical in the apparel industry, the Company experiences its greatest sales activity during the Fall season due to Back-to-School and Holiday sales periods, particularly in the U.S. The Company relies on excess operating cash flows, which are largely generated in the Fall season, to fund operating expenses throughout the year and to reinvest in the business to support future growth. The Company also has a credit facility and the term loan agreement available as sources of additional funding.
Credit Agreements
On July 28, 2011, the Company entered into an unsecured amended and restated credit agreement (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) under which up to $350 million is available. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement served to amend and restate, in its entirety, the credit agreement dated April 15, 2008 as previously amended (the “Prior Credit Agreement”). The primary reasons for entering into the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were to extend the termination date from April 12, 2013 to July 27, 2016 and to reduce fees and interest rates.
As of March 22, 2013, the Company had approximately $350 million available under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement on February 2, 2013.
On February 24, 2012, the Company entered into a $300 million Term Loan Agreement to increase its flexibility and liquidity. On January 23, 2013, the Company amended both the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Term Loan Agreement to reduce the amount available for borrowing under the Term Loan Agreement to $150 million and lower the applicable Coverage Ratio to 1.75 to 1.00. In addition, the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and the Term Loan Agreement both have a Leverage Ratio. The Company was in compliance with the applicable ratio requirements and other covenants at February 2, 2013. Subsequent to year end, the Company drew down the full $150 million available under the Term Loan Agreement.
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and the Term Loan Agreement, including the material covenants which apply to each, are described in Note 16, “
BORROWINGS,
” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in "ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA," of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Stand-by letters of credit outstanding as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 were immaterial.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was
$684.2 million
for Fiscal 2012 compared to
$365.2 million
for Fiscal 2011. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily driven by a change in inventories partially offset by a change in accounts payable.
Investing Activities
Cash outflows for investing activities for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 were used primarily for capital expenditures related to new store construction and information technology investments. Cash outflows for capital expenditures were consistent from Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011. In Fiscal 2012, cash flows for investing activities included proceeds received from sales of marketable securities.
Financing Activities
For Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, cash outflows for financing activities consisted primarily of the repurchase of A&F’s Common Stock and the payment of dividends. For Fiscal 2011, net cash outflows related to the repurchase of A&F's Common Stock, payment of dividends and the repayment of borrowings under the then existing credit agreement were partially offset by the receipt of proceeds associated with the exercise of share-based compensation awards.
During Fiscal 2012, A&F repurchased approximately 7.5 million shares of A&F’s Common Stock in the open market with a market value of approximately $321.7 million. During Fiscal 2011, A&F repurchased approximately 3.5 million shares of A&F’s Common Stock in the open market with a market value of $196.6 million. During Fiscal 2010, A&F repurchased approximately 1.6 million shares of A&F’s Common Stock in the open market with a market value of $76.2 million. Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010 repurchases were pursuant to the authorizations of A&F's Board of Directors.
As of
February 2, 2013
, A&F had approximately 18.7 million remaining shares available for repurchase as part of the A&F Board of Directors’ previously approved authorizations.
36
Future Cash Requirements and Sources of Cash
Over the next twelve months, the Company’s primary cash requirements will be to fund operating activities, including the acquisition of inventory, and obligations related to compensation, rent, taxes and other operating activities, as well as capital expenditures and paying of quarterly dividend payments to stockholders subject to the A&F Board of Directors’ approval. The Company also has availability under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as a source of additional funding. In addition, on February 21, 2013, the Company drew down the full $150 million available under the Term Loan Agreement to take advantage of the current lending market and to increase its flexibility and liquidity. The Company expects to generate positive free cash flow defined as operating cash flow less capital expenditures for Fiscal 2013.
Subject to suitable market conditions, A&F expects to continue to repurchase shares of its Common Stock. The Company anticipates funding these cash requirements with available cash from operations and as deemed appropriate, the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and the Term Loan Agreement proceeds.
The Company is not dependent on dividends from its foreign subsidiaries to fund its U.S. operations or make distributions to A&F's shareholders. Unremitted earnings from foreign subsidiaries, which are considered to be invested indefinitely, would become subject to income tax if they were remitted as dividends or were lent to A&F or a U.S. affiliate.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
February 2, 2013
, the Company did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
Payments due by period (thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating Lease Obligations
(1)
|
$
|
2,635,519
|
|
$
|
421,577
|
|
$
|
758,711
|
|
$
|
586,752
|
|
$
|
868,479
|
|
|||||
|
Purchase Obligations
|
161,615
|
|
161,615
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Other Obligations
|
41,584
|
|
18,634
|
|
9,493
|
|
1,110
|
|
12,347
|
|
||||||||||
|
Dividends
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
2,838,718
|
|
$
|
601,826
|
|
$
|
768,204
|
|
$
|
587,862
|
|
$
|
880,826
|
|
|||||
(1)
Includes leasehold financing obligations of $71.7 million and related interest. Refer to Note 17, "LEASEHOLD FINANCING OBLIGATIONS," of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional reference.
Operating lease obligations consist primarily of non-cancelable future minimum lease commitments related to store operating leases. See Note 12, “
LEASED FACILITIES,
” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for further discussion. Excluded from the obligations above are amounts related to portions of lease terms that are currently cancelable at the Company's discretion. While included in the obligations above, in many instances, the Company has options to terminate certain leases if stated sales volume levels are not met or the Company ceases operations in a given country. Operating lease obligations do not include common area maintenance (“CAM”), insurance, marketing or tax payments for which the Company is also obligated. Total expense related to CAM, insurance, marketing and taxes was $168.6 million in Fiscal 2012.
The purchase obligations category represents purchase orders for merchandise to be delivered during Fiscal 2013 and commitments for fabric expected to be used during upcoming seasons.
Other obligations consist primarily of asset retirement obligations and information technology contracts.
Due to uncertainty as to the amounts and timing of future payments, the contractual obligations table above does not include tax (including accrued interest and penalties) of $16.0 million related to uncertain tax positions at
February 2, 2013
. Deferred taxes are also not included in the preceding table. For further discussion, see Note 15, “
INCOME TAXES,
” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The table above does not include estimated future retirement payments under the Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) for the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer with a present value of $18.5 million at
February 2, 2013
. See Note 20, “
RETIREMENT BENEFITS,
” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the description of the SERP to be included in the text under the caption “EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013, incorporated by reference in “ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
37
A&F has historically paid quarterly dividends on its Common Stock. There are no amounts included in the above table related to dividends due to the fact that dividends are subject to determination and approval by A&F's Board of Directors.
38
Year-To-Date Store Count and Gross Square Feet
Store count and gross square footage by brand for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively, were as follows:
|
Store Activity
|
Abercrombie & Fitch
|
abercrombie
|
Hollister
|
Gilly Hicks
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
U.S. Stores
|
|||||||||||||||
|
January 28, 2012
|
280
|
|
154
|
|
494
|
|
18
|
|
946
|
|
|||||
|
New
|
4
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
13
|
|
|||||
|
Closed
|
(18
|
)
|
(13
|
)
|
(15
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
(47
|
)
|
|||||
|
February 2, 2013
|
266
|
|
144
|
|
482
|
|
20
|
|
912
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Square Feet at February 2, 2013
|
2,378
|
|
677
|
|
3,287
|
|
170
|
|
6,512
|
|
|||||
|
International Stores
|
|||||||||||||||
|
January 28, 2012
|
14
|
|
5
|
|
77
|
|
3
|
|
99
|
|
|||||
|
New
|
5
|
|
1
|
|
30
|
|
4
|
|
40
|
|
|||||
|
Closed
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
February 2, 2013
|
19
|
|
6
|
|
107
|
|
7
|
|
139
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Square Feet at February 2, 2013
|
401
|
|
71
|
|
926
|
|
48
|
|
1,446
|
|
|||||
|
Total Stores
|
285
|
|
150
|
|
589
|
|
27
|
|
1,051
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Square Feet at February 2, 2013
|
2,779
|
|
748
|
|
4,213
|
|
218
|
|
7,958
|
|
|||||
|
Store Activity
|
Abercrombie & Fitch
|
abercrombie
|
Hollister
|
Gilly Hicks
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
U.S. Stores
|
|||||||||||||||
|
January 29, 2011
|
316
|
|
181
|
|
502
|
|
18
|
|
1,017
|
|
|||||
|
New
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
|||||
|
Closed
|
(37)
|
|
(28)
|
|
(9)
|
|
—
|
|
(74)
|
|
|||||
|
January 28, 2012
|
280
|
|
154
|
|
494
|
|
18
|
|
946
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Square Feet at January 28, 2012
|
2,514
|
|
727
|
|
3,373
|
|
176
|
|
6,790
|
|
|||||
|
International Stores
|
|||||||||||||||
|
January 29, 2011
|
9
|
|
4
|
|
38
|
|
1
|
|
52
|
|
|||||
|
New
|
5
|
|
1
|
|
39
|
|
2
|
|
47
|
|
|||||
|
Closed
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
January 28, 2012
|
14
|
|
5
|
|
77
|
|
3
|
|
99
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Square Feet at January 28, 2012
|
264
|
|
59
|
|
642
|
|
23
|
|
988
|
|
|||||
|
Total Stores
|
294
|
|
159
|
|
571
|
|
21
|
|
1,045
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Square Feet at January 28, 2012
|
2,778
|
|
786
|
|
4,015
|
|
199
|
|
7,778
|
|
|||||
39
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Capital expenditures totaled
$339.9 million
,
$318.6 million
and
$160.9 million
for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively. A summary of capital expenditures is as follows:
|
Capital Expenditures (in millions)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
New Store Construction, Store Refreshes and Remodels
|
$
|
245.3
|
|
$
|
258.0
|
|
$
|
118.0
|
|
|||
|
Home Office, Distribution Centers and Information Technology
|
94.6
|
|
60.6
|
|
42.9
|
|
||||||
|
Total Capital Expenditures
|
$
|
339.9
|
|
$
|
318.6
|
|
$
|
160.9
|
|
|||
During Fiscal 2013, based on new store opening plans and other capital expenditure plans, the Company expects total capital expenditures to be approximately $200 million.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, Accounting Standards Codification 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” (“ASC 820-10”) was amended to clarify certain disclosure requirements and improve consistency with international reporting standards. This amendment is to be applied prospectively and became effective for the Company beginning January 29, 2012. The adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” was amended in June 2011 to require entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendment does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income under current GAAP. This guidance became effective for the Company’s fiscal year and interim periods beginning January 29, 2012. The adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, which further amends Accounting Standards Codification Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income." The ASU contains new requirements related to the presentation and disclosure of items that are reclassified out of other comprehensive income. The new requirements will give financial statement users a more comprehensive view of items that are reclassified out of other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 is effective for the Company's fiscal year and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012, and is to be applied prospectively. Since the guidance relates only to presentation and disclosure of information, adoption is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Since actual results may differ from those estimates, the Company revises its estimates and assumptions as new information becomes available.
The Company believes the following policies are the most critical to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
40
|
Policy
|
|
Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
|
|
Revenue Recognition
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes retail sales at the time the customer takes possession of the merchandise. The Company reserves for sales returns through estimates based on historical experience and various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable. The value of point of sale coupons that result in a reduction of the price paid by the customer is recorded as a reduction of sales.
The Company sells gift cards in its stores and through direct-to-consumer operations. The Company accounts for gift cards sold to customers by recognizing a liability at the time of sale. The liability remains on the Company’s books until the earlier of redemption (recognized as revenue) or when the Company determines the likelihood of redemption is remote, known as breakage (recognized as other operating income), based on historical redemption patterns.
|
|
The Company has not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to determine the sales return reserve and revenue recognition for gift cards over the past three fiscal years.
The Company does not expect material changes in the near term to the underlying assumptions used to measure the sales return reserve or to measure the timing and amount of future gift card redemptions as of February 2, 2013. However, changes in these assumptions do occur, and, should those changes be significant, the Company may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material.
A 10% change in the sales return reserve as of February 2, 2013 would have affected pre-tax income by an immaterial amount for Fiscal 2012.
A 10% change in the assumption of the breakage for gift cards as of February 2, 2013 would have affected pre-tax income by an immaterial amount for Fiscal 2012.
|
|
Inventory Valuation
|
|
|
|
Inventories are principally valued at the lower of average cost or market utilizing the weighted average cost method (the "cost method").
The Company reduces the inventory valuation only when the cost of specific inventory items on hand exceeds the amount expected to be realized from the ultimate sale or disposal of the goods through a lower of cost or market ("LCM") reserve. Additionally, as part of inventory valuation, an inventory shrink estimate is made each period that reduces the value of inventory for lost or stolen items. |
|
Effective February 2, 2013, the Company changed its method of accounting for inventories from the retail method to the cost method. This accounting change resulted in a fundamental change in the inventory valuation reserve from a markdown reserve under the retail method to an LCM reserve under the cost method. The Company has not made any material changes to the way it accounts for shrink during the past three fiscal years.
The Company does not expect material changes in the near term to the underlying assumptions used to determine the shrink reserve or LCM reserve as of February 2, 2013. However, changes in these assumptions do occur, and, should those changes be significant, they could significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost, as well as the resulting gross margin(s). An increase or decrease in the LCM reserve of 10% would have affected pre-tax income by approximately $1.0 million for Fiscal 2012. An increase or decrease in the inventory shrink accrual of 10% would have affected pre-tax income by approximately $1.2 million for Fiscal 2012. |
41
|
Policy
|
|
Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
|
|
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets, primarily comprised of property and equipment, are reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that full recoverability of net asset group balances through future cash flows is in question. In addition, the Company conducts an annual impairment analysis in the fourth quarter of each year. For the purposes of the annual review, the Company reviews long-lived assets associated with stores that have an operating loss in the current year and have been open for at least two full years.
The Company’s impairment calculation requires management to make assumptions and judgments related to factors used in the evaluation for impairment, including, but not limited to, management’s expectations for future operations and projected cash flows. The key assumptions used in our undiscounted future cash flow model include sales, gross margin and, to a lesser extent, operating expenses.
|
|
The Company has not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to determine impairment loss over the past three fiscal years.
During Fiscal 2012, 44 stores, which excludes stores with a de minimis book value, were tested for impairment during the fourth quarter as part of our annual review of all stores. Of the 44 stores tested for impairment, 17 failed step one and were impaired. Of the 27 stores not impaired, 18 stores, with an aggregate net asset group value of $17.0 million, had undiscounted cash flows which were 150% or more of this net asset group value. Nine stores, with an aggregate net asset group value of $2.6 million, had undiscounted cash flows which were in the range of 100% to 150% of this net asset group value.
The Company does not expect material changes in the near term to the assumptions underlying its impairment calculations as of February 2, 2013. However, if changes in these assumptions do occur, and, should those changes be significant, they could have a material impact on the Company’s determination of whether or not there has been an impairment.
A 10% decrease in the sales assumption used to project future cash flows in Fiscal 2012 impairment test would have increased the impairment charge by approximately $17.0 million for Fiscal 2012.
|
42
|
Policy
|
|
Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability approach. Tax laws often require items to be included in tax filings at different times than the items are being reflected in the financial statements. A current liability is recognized for the estimated taxes payable for the current year. Deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid. Deferred taxes are adjusted for enacted changes in tax rates and tax laws. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.
A provision for U.S. income tax has not been recorded on undistributed profits of non-U.S. subsidiaries that the Company has determined to be indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability on these unremitted earnings is not practicable because of the complexities associated with this hypothetical calculation.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of tax expense upon settlement, law changes or expiration of statute of limitations.
|
|
The Company does not expect material changes in the judgments, assumptions or interpretations used to calculate the tax provision for Fiscal 2012. However, changes in these assumptions may occur and should those changes be significant, they could have a material impact on the Company’s income tax provision.
If the Company’s intention or U.S. and/or international tax law changes in the future, there may be a significant negative impact on the provision for income taxes to record an incremental tax liability in the period the change occurs.
Of the total uncertain tax positions, it is reasonably possible that $7 million to $12 million could change in the next twelve months due to audit settlements, expiration of statutes of limitations or other resolution of uncertainties. Due to the uncertain and complex application of tax regulations, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of audits may result in amounts which could be different from this estimate. In such case, the Company will record an adjustment in the period in which such matters are effectively settled.
|
|
Equity Compensation Expense
|
|
|
|
The Company’s equity compensation expense related to stock options and stock appreciation rights granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of the stock option and stock appreciation right grants, which requires the Company to estimate the expected term of the stock option and stock appreciation right grants and expected future stock price volatility over the expected term.
|
|
During Fiscal 2012, the Company granted stock appreciation rights covering an aggregate of 363,800 shares. A 10% increase in the assumed expected term would have yielded a 3% increase in the Black-Scholes valuation for stock appreciation rights granted during the year, while a 10% increase in assumed stock price volatility would have yielded a 6% increase in the Black-Scholes valuation for stock appreciation rights granted during the year.
|
43
|
Policy
|
|
Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
|
Effective February 2, 2003, the Company established a Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan to provide additional retirement income to its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Subject to service requirements, the CEO will receive a monthly benefit equal to 50% of his final average compensation (as defined in the SERP) for life. The final average compensation used for the calculation is based on actual compensation (base salary and actual annual cash incentive compensation) averaged over the last 36 consecutive full calendar months ending before the CEO’s retirement.
The Company’s accrual for the SERP requires management to make assumptions and judgments related to the CEO’s final average compensation, life expectancy and discount rate.
|
|
The Company does not expect material changes in the near term to the underlying assumptions used to determine the accrual for the SERP as of February 2, 2013. However, changes in these assumptions do occur, and, should those changes be significant, the Company may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material.
A 10% increase in final average compensation as of February 2, 2013 would increase the SERP accrual by approximately $1.8 million. A 50 basis point increase in the discount rate as of February 2, 2013 would decrease the SERP accrual by an immaterial amount.
|
|
Legal Contingencies
|
|
|
|
The Company is a defendant in lawsuits and other adversarial proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Legal costs incurred in connection with the resolution of claims and lawsuits are expensed as incurred, and the Company establishes reserves for the outcome of litigation where it deems appropriate to do so under applicable accounting rules.
|
|
Actual liabilities may exceed or be less than the amounts reserved, and there can be no assurance that the final resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
|
44
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
|
Investment Securities
The Company maintains its cash equivalents in financial instruments, primarily money market funds and United States treasury bills, with original maturities of three months or less.
The irrevocable rabbi trust (the “Rabbi Trust”) is intended to be used as a source of funds to match respective funding obligations to participants in the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan I, the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan II and the Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. As of
February 2, 2013
, total assets held in the Rabbi Trust were $87.6 million and related to trust-owned life insurance policies with a cash surrender value of $87.6 million and an immaterial amount of assets held in money market funds. The trust-owned life insurance policies are recorded at cash surrender value, in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are restricted as to their use as noted above. The change in cash surrender value of the trust-owned life insurance policies held in the Rabbi Trust resulted in realized gains of $2.4 million and $2.5 million for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively.
Interest Rate Risks
As of February 2, 2013, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement or the Term Loan Agreement.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
A&F’s international subsidiaries generally operate with functional currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. Dollars. Therefore, the Company must translate revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities from functional currencies into U.S. Dollars at exchange rates in effect during or at the end of the reporting period. The fluctuation in the value of the U.S. Dollar against other currencies affects the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. The potential impact of currency fluctuation increases as international expansion increases.
A&F and its subsidiaries have exposure to changes in currency exchange rates associated with foreign currency transactions and forecasted foreign currency transactions, including the sale of inventory between subsidiaries and foreign denominated assets and liabilities. Such transactions are denominated primarily in U.S. Dollars, British Pounds, Canadian Dollars, Chinese Yuan, Danish Kroner, Euros, Hong Kong Dollars, Japanese Yen, Polish Zloty, South Korean Won, Singapore Dollars, Swedish Kroner and Swiss Francs. The Company has established a program that primarily utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to partially offset the risks associated with the effects of certain foreign currency transactions and forecasted transactions. Under this program, increases or decreases in foreign currency exposures are partially offset by gains or losses on forward contracts, to mitigate the impact of foreign currency gains or losses. The Company does not use forward contracts to engage in currency speculation. All outstanding foreign currency forward contracts are recorded at fair value at the end of each fiscal period.
45
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
(Restated see Note 4)
|
|||||||||||
|
NET SALES
|
$
|
4,510,805
|
|
$
|
4,158,058
|
|
$
|
3,468,777
|
|
||
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
1,694,096
|
|
1,607,834
|
|
1,251,348
|
|
|||||
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
2,816,709
|
|
2,550,224
|
|
2,217,429
|
|
|||||
|
Stores and Distribution Expense
|
1,987,926
|
|
1,888,248
|
|
1,589,501
|
|
|||||
|
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense
|
473,883
|
|
437,120
|
|
400,804
|
|
|||||
|
Other Operating Expense (Income), Net
|
(19,333
|
)
|
3,472
|
|
(10,056
|
)
|
|||||
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
374,233
|
|
221,384
|
|
237,180
|
|
|||||
|
Interest Expense, Net
|
7,288
|
|
3,577
|
|
3,362
|
|
|||||
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES
|
366,945
|
|
217,807
|
|
233,818
|
|
|||||
|
Tax Expense from Continuing Operations
|
129,934
|
|
74,669
|
|
78,109
|
|
|||||
|
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
$
|
237,011
|
|
$
|
143,138
|
|
$
|
155,709
|
|
||
|
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, Net of Tax
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
NET INCOME
|
$
|
237,011
|
|
$
|
143,934
|
|
$
|
155,709
|
|
||
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
|
|||||||||||
|
BASIC
|
$
|
2.89
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
||
|
DILUTED
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
||
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
|
|||||||||||
|
BASIC
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
DILUTED
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE:
|
|||||||||||
|
BASIC
|
$
|
2.89
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
||
|
DILUTED
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
||
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|||||||||||
|
BASIC
|
81,940
|
|
86,848
|
|
88,061
|
|
|||||
|
DILUTED
|
83,175
|
|
89,537
|
|
89,851
|
|
|||||
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
||
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|||||||||||
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
$
|
(427
|
)
|
$
|
(8,658
|
)
|
$
|
3,238
|
|
||
|
Gains (Losses) on Marketable Securities, net of taxes of $(5,526) and $366 for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively.
|
—
|
|
9,409
|
|
(622
|
)
|
|||||
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments, net of taxes of $2,361, $(1,216) and $188 for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively.
|
(19,152
|
)
|
12,217
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
$
|
(19,579
|
)
|
$
|
12,968
|
|
$
|
2,296
|
|
||
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
$
|
217,432
|
|
$
|
156,902
|
|
$
|
158,005
|
|
||
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
46
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Thousands, except par value amounts)
|
February 2,
2013 |
January 28,
2012 |
||||||
|
ASSETS
|
(Restated see Note 4)
|
||||||
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|||||||
|
Cash and Equivalents
|
$
|
643,505
|
|
$
|
583,495
|
|
|
|
Marketable Securities
|
—
|
|
84,650
|
|
|||
|
Receivables
|
99,622
|
|
89,350
|
|
|||
|
Inventories
|
426,962
|
|
679,935
|
|
|||
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
32,558
|
|
35,882
|
|
|||
|
Other Current Assets
|
105,177
|
|
84,342
|
|
|||
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
1,307,824
|
|
1,557,654
|
|
|||
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
1,308,232
|
|
1,197,271
|
|
|||
|
NON-CURRENT MARKETABLE SECURITIES
|
—
|
|
14,858
|
|
|||
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
371,345
|
|
347,249
|
|
|||
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$
|
2,987,401
|
|
$
|
3,117,032
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
|
Accounts Payable
|
$
|
140,396
|
|
$
|
211,368
|
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses
|
395,734
|
|
369,073
|
|
|||
|
Deferred Lease Credits
|
39,054
|
|
41,047
|
|
|||
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
115,617
|
|
77,918
|
|
|||
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
690,801
|
|
699,406
|
|
|||
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
|
Deferred Lease Credits
|
168,397
|
|
183,022
|
|
|||
|
Leasehold Financing Obligations
|
63,942
|
|
57,851
|
|
|||
|
Other Liabilities
|
245,993
|
|
245,418
|
|
|||
|
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
478,332
|
|
486,291
|
|
|||
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
|
|||||||
|
Class A Common Stock — $0.01 par value: 150,000 shares authorized and 103,300 shares issued at each of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
|
1,033
|
|
1,033
|
|
|||
|
Paid-In Capital
|
403,271
|
|
369,171
|
|
|||
|
Retained Earnings
|
2,567,261
|
|
2,389,614
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax
|
(13,288
|
)
|
6,291
|
|
|||
|
Treasury Stock, at Average Cost — 24,855 and 17,662 shares at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively
|
(1,140,009
|
)
|
(834,774
|
)
|
|||
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
1,818,268
|
|
1,931,335
|
|
|||
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
2,987,401
|
|
$
|
3,117,032
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
47
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Common Stock
|
Paid-In
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
|
Treasury Stock
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
Outstanding
|
Par
Value
|
Shares
|
At Average
Cost
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, January 30, 2010
|
87,986
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
$
|
339,453
|
|
$
|
2,183,690
|
|
$
|
(8,973
|
)
|
15,314
|
|
$
|
(687,286
|
)
|
$
|
1,827,917
|
|
|||||||
|
Cumulative restatement for change in inventory accounting (See Note 4)
|
47,341
|
|
47,341
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restated Net Income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
155,709
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
155,709
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Purchase of Common Stock
|
(1,582
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,582
|
|
(76,158
|
)
|
(76,158
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Dividends ($0.70 per share)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(61,656
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(61,656
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation Issuances and Exercises
|
842
|
|
—
|
|
(29,741
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(842
|
)
|
38,136
|
|
8,395
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Tax Deficiency from Share-based Compensation Issuances and Exercises
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,053
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,053
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation Expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
40,599
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
40,599
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Unrealized Gains on Marketable Securities
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(622
|
)
|
—
|
|
(622
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net Change in Unrealized Gains or Losses on Derivative Financial Instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(320
|
)
|
—
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,238
|
|
—
|
|
3,238
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance, January 29, 2011
|
87,246
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
$
|
349,258
|
|
$
|
2,325,084
|
|
$
|
(6,677
|
)
|
16,054
|
|
$
|
(725,308
|
)
|
$
|
1,943,390
|
|
|||||||
|
Restated Net Income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
143,934
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
143,934
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Purchase of Common Stock
|
(3,546
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,546
|
|
(196,605
|
)
|
(196,605
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Dividends ($0.70 per share)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(60,956
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(60,956
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation Issuances and Exercises
|
1,938
|
|
—
|
|
(34,153
|
)
|
(18,448
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,938
|
)
|
87,139
|
|
34,538
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Tax Deficiency from Share-based Compensation Issuances and Exercises
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,973
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,973
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation Expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
51,093
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
51,093
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Losses on Marketable Securities reclassed to the Income Statement
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,409
|
|
—
|
|
9,409
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net Change in Unrealized Gains or Losses on Derivative Financial Instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,217
|
|
—
|
|
12,217
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(8,658
|
)
|
—
|
|
(8,658
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance, January 28, 2012
|
85,638
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
$
|
369,171
|
|
$
|
2,389,614
|
|
$
|
6,291
|
|
17,662
|
|
$
|
(834,774
|
)
|
$
|
1,931,335
|
|
|||||||
|
Net Income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
237,011
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
237,011
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Purchase of Common Stock
|
(7,548
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,548
|
|
(321,665
|
)
|
(321,665
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Dividends ($0.70 per share)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(57,634
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(57,634
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation Issuances and Exercises
|
355
|
|
—
|
|
(18,356
|
)
|
(1,730
|
)
|
—
|
|
(355
|
)
|
16,430
|
|
(3,656
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Tax Benefit from Share-based Compensation Issuances and Exercises
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(466
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation Expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
52,922
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
52,922
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net Change in Unrealized Gains or Losses on Derivative Financial Instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(19,152
|
)
|
—
|
|
(19,152
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(427
|
)
|
—
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance, February 2, 2013
|
78,445
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
$
|
403,271
|
|
$
|
2,567,261
|
|
$
|
(13,288
|
)
|
24,855
|
|
$
|
(1,140,009
|
)
|
$
|
1,818,268
|
|
|||||||
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
48
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Thousands)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
|
(
Restated see Note 4)
|
||||||||||
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$
|
237,011
|
|
$
|
143,934
|
|
$
|
155,709
|
|
||
|
Impact of Other Operating Activities on Cash Flows:
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
224,245
|
|
232,956
|
|
229,153
|
|
|||||
|
Non-Cash Charge for Asset Impairment
|
7,407
|
|
68,022
|
|
50,631
|
|
|||||
|
Loss on Disposal / Write-off of Assets
|
11,866
|
|
22,460
|
|
7,064
|
|
|||||
|
Lessor Construction Allowances
|
22,522
|
|
41,509
|
|
35,281
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of Deferred Lease Credits
|
(45,942
|
)
|
(48,258
|
)
|
(48,373
|
)
|
|||||
|
Deferred Taxes
|
(21,543
|
)
|
(31,252
|
)
|
(28,001
|
)
|
|||||
|
Share-Based Compensation
|
52,922
|
|
51,093
|
|
40,599
|
|
|||||
|
Tax Benefit (Deficiency) from Share-Based Compensation
|
(466
|
)
|
2,973
|
|
(1,053
|
)
|
|||||
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Share-Based Compensation
|
(1,198
|
)
|
(4,821
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Auction Rate Securities (Gain) Loss
|
(2,454
|
)
|
13,442
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Inventories
|
253,650
|
|
(216,133
|
)
|
(79,869
|
)
|
|||||
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
(34,692
|
)
|
130,180
|
|
27,108
|
|
|||||
|
Income Taxes
|
37,628
|
|
4,754
|
|
63,807
|
|
|||||
|
Other Assets and Liabilities
|
(56,785
|
)
|
(45,640
|
)
|
(60,267
|
)
|
|||||
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
684,171
|
|
365,219
|
|
391,789
|
|
|||||
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||
|
Capital Expenditures
|
(339,862
|
)
|
(318,598
|
)
|
(160,935
|
)
|
|||||
|
Purchase of Trust-Owned Life Insurance Policies
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16,583
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from Sales of Marketable Securities
|
101,963
|
|
2,650
|
|
84,542
|
|
|||||
|
Other Investing
|
(9,339
|
)
|
(24,741
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
NET CASH USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(247,238
|
)
|
(340,689
|
)
|
(92,976
|
)
|
|||||
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||
|
Proceeds from Share-Based Compensation
|
2,676
|
|
46,530
|
|
13,941
|
|
|||||
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Share Based Compensation
|
1,198
|
|
4,821
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from Borrowings under Credit Agreement
|
135,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Repayment of Borrowings under Credit Agreement
|
(135,000
|
)
|
(45,002
|
)
|
(12,093
|
)
|
|||||
|
Purchase of Common Stock
|
(321,665
|
)
|
(196,605
|
)
|
(76,158
|
)
|
|||||
|
Dividends Paid
|
(57,634
|
)
|
(60,956
|
)
|
(61,656
|
)
|
|||||
|
Change in Outstanding Checks and Other
|
(4,646
|
)
|
(14,117
|
)
|
(9,367
|
)
|
|||||
|
NET CASH USED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
(380,071
|
)
|
(265,329
|
)
|
(145,333
|
)
|
|||||
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH
|
3,148
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
2,923
|
|
|||||
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS:
|
60,010
|
|
(242,858
|
)
|
156,403
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and Equivalents, Beginning of Period
|
583,495
|
|
826,353
|
|
669,950
|
|
|||||
|
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$
|
643,505
|
|
$
|
583,495
|
|
$
|
826,353
|
|
||
|
SIGNIFICANT NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||
|
Change in Accrual for Construction in Progress
|
$
|
(12,919
|
)
|
$
|
23,040
|
|
$
|
18,741
|
|
||
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
49
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
1.
|
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (“A&F”), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, A&F and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are referred to as “Abercrombie & Fitch” or the “Company”), is a specialty retailer of high-quality, casual apparel for men, women and kids with an active, youthful lifestyle.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the historical financial statements of, and transactions applicable to, the Company and reflect its assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows.
FISCAL YEAR
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31, typically resulting in a fifty-two week year, but occasionally giving rise to an additional week, resulting in a fifty-three week year as was the case for Fiscal 2012. Fiscal years are designated in the consolidated financial statements and notes by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. All references herein to “Fiscal
2012
” represent the 53-week fiscal year ended
February 2, 2013
; to “Fiscal
2011
” represent the 52-week fiscal year ended
January 28, 2012
; and to “Fiscal
2010
” represent the 52-week fiscal year ended
January 29, 2011
. In addition, all references herein to “Fiscal
2013
” represent the 52-week fiscal year that will end on February 1, 2014.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified or adjusted to conform to the current year presentation.
|
2.
|
SEGMENT REPORTING
|
The Company determines its segments on the same basis that it uses to allocate resources and assess performance. All of the Company’s segments sell a similar group of products—casual sportswear apparel, personal care products and accessories for men, women and kids and bras, underwear and sleepwear for girls. The Company has
three
reportable segments: U.S. Stores, International Stores, and Direct-to-Consumer. Corporate functions, interest income and expense, and other income and expense are evaluated on a consolidated basis and are not allocated to the Company’s segments, and therefore are included in Other.
The U.S. Stores reportable segment includes the results of store operations in the United States and Puerto Rico, including outlet stores. The International Stores reportable segment includes the results of store operations in Canada, Europe and Asia and sell-off of merchandise to authorized third-party resellers. The Direct-to-Consumer reportable segment includes the results of operations directly associated with on-line operations, both domestic and international.
Operating income is the primary measure of profit the Company uses to make decisions regarding the allocation of resources to its operating segments. For the U.S. Stores and International Stores reportable segments, operating income is defined as aggregate income directly attributable to individual stores on a four-wall basis. Four-wall expense includes all expenses contained “within the four walls of the stores.” The four-wall expense includes: cost of merchandise, selling payroll and related costs, rent, utilities, depreciation, repairs and maintenance, supplies and packaging and other store sales-related expenses including credit card and bank fees and taxes. Operating income also reflects pre-opening charges related to stores not yet in operation. For the Direct-to-Consumer reportable segment, operating income is defined as aggregate income attributable to the direct-to-consumer business, less call center, fulfillment and shipping expense, charge card fees and direct-to-consumer operations management and support expenses. The U.S. Stores, International Stores and Direct-to-Consumer segments exclude marketing, general and administrative expense; store management and support functions such as regional and district management and other functions not dedicated to an individual store; and distribution center costs. All costs excluded from the three reportable segments are included in Other.
Reportable segment assets include those used directly in or resulting from the operations of each reportable segment. Total assets for the U.S. Stores and International Stores reportable segments primarily consist of store cash, credit card receivables, prepaid rent, store packaging and supplies, lease deposits, merchandise inventory, leasehold acquisition costs, restricted cash and the net book value of store long-lived assets. Total assets for International Stores also include VAT receivables. Total assets for the Direct-to-Consumer reportable segment primarily consist of credit card receivables, merchandise inventory, and the net book value of long-lived assets. Total assets for Other include cash, investments, distribution center inventory, the net book value of home office and distribution center long-lived assets, foreign currency hed
ge assets and tax-related assets. Reportable segment capital expenditures are direct purchases of property and equipment for that segment.
50
The following table provides the Company’s segment information as of, and for the fiscal years ended
February 2, 2013
,
January 28, 2012
and
January 29, 2011
. All results reported below have been adjusted based on the change in accounting principle as noted in Note 4.
|
U.S. Stores
|
International
Stores
|
Direct-to-
Consumer
Operations
|
Segment
Total
|
Other
(1)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
February 2, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Sales
|
$
|
2,615,138
|
|
$
|
1,195,016
|
|
$
|
700,651
|
|
$
|
4,510,805
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
4,510,805
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
94,367
|
|
67,972
|
|
5,198
|
|
167,537
|
|
56,708
|
|
224,245
|
|
||||||||||
|
Operating Income
(2)
|
432,040
|
|
350,871
|
|
269,479
|
|
1,052,390
|
|
(678,157
|
)
|
374,233
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total Assets
|
587,334
|
|
840,317
|
|
63,063
|
|
1,490,714
|
|
1,496,687
|
|
2,987,401
|
|
||||||||||
|
Capital Expenditures
|
3,016
|
|
218,933
|
|
22,567
|
|
244,516
|
|
95,346
|
|
339,862
|
|
||||||||||
|
January 28, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Sales
|
2,710,842
|
|
894,616
|
|
552,600
|
|
4,158,058
|
|
—
|
|
4,158,058
|
|
||||||||||
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
125,827
|
|
35,844
|
|
2,876
|
|
164,547
|
|
68,409
|
|
232,956
|
|
||||||||||
|
Operating Income
(3)
|
362,760
|
|
282,462
|
|
224,759
|
|
869,981
|
|
(648,597
|
)
|
221,384
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total Assets
|
755,330
|
|
661,680
|
|
90,922
|
|
1,507,932
|
|
1,609,100
|
|
3,117,032
|
|
||||||||||
|
Capital Expenditures
|
1,105
|
|
229,959
|
|
8,367
|
|
239,431
|
|
79,167
|
|
318,598
|
|
||||||||||
|
January 29, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Sales
|
2,546,798
|
|
517,005
|
|
404,974
|
|
3,468,777
|
|
—
|
|
3,468,777
|
|
||||||||||
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
149,533
|
|
17,680
|
|
3,154
|
|
170,367
|
|
58,786
|
|
229,153
|
|
||||||||||
|
Operating Income
(4)
|
392,626
|
|
192,583
|
|
197,809
|
|
783,018
|
|
(545,838
|
)
|
237,180
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total Assets
|
898,157
|
|
370,209
|
|
46,331
|
|
1,314,697
|
|
1,679,325
|
|
2,994,022
|
|
||||||||||
|
Capital Expenditures
|
24,706
|
|
85,435
|
|
816
|
|
110,957
|
|
49,978
|
|
160,935
|
|
||||||||||
|
(1)
|
Includes corporate functions such as Design, Merchandising, Sourcing, Planning, Allocation, Store Management and Support, Marketing, Distribution Center Operations, Information Technology, Real Estate, Finance, Legal, Human Resources and other corporate overhead. Operating Income includes: marketing, general and administrative expense; store management and support functions such as regional and district management and other functions not dedicated to an individual store; and distribution center costs.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes charges for asset impairments of
$7.4 million
for U.S. Stores.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes charges for asset impairments and write-down of store-related long-lived assets of
$52.1 million
and
$15.9 million
for U.S. Stores and International Stores, respectively.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes charges for asset impairments of
$50.6 million
for U.S. Stores.
|
Geographic Information
Financial information relating to the Company’s operations by geographic area is as follows:
51
Net Sales:
Net sales includes net merchandise sales through stores and direct-to-consumer operations, including shipping and handling revenue. Net sales are reported by geographic area based on the location of the customer.
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
Fiscal 2011
|
Fiscal 2010
|
||||||||
|
|
(in thousands):
|
||||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
3,087,205
|
|
$
|
3,108,380
|
|
$
|
2,821,993
|
|
||
|
Europe
|
1,137,664
|
|
822,473
|
|
443,836
|
|
|||||
|
Other International
|
285,936
|
|
227,205
|
|
202,948
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
4,510,805
|
|
$
|
4,158,058
|
|
$
|
3,468,777
|
|
||
Long-Lived Assets:
|
February 2, 2013
|
January 28, 2012
|
||||||
|
|
(in thousands):
|
||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
742,926
|
|
$
|
794,723
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
496,960
|
|
366,647
|
|
|||
|
Other International
|
177,780
|
|
156,361
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,417,666
|
|
$
|
1,317,731
|
|
|
Long-lived assets included in the table above include primarily property and equipment (net), store supplies and lease deposits.
|
3.
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of A&F and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS
See Note 6,
“CASH AND EQUIVALENTS.”
INVESTMENTS
See Note 7, “
INVESTMENTS.
”
RECEIVABLES
Receivables primarily include credit card receivables, construction allowances, value added tax (“VAT”) receivables and other tax credits or refunds.
As part of the normal course of business, the Company has approximately three to four days of sales transactions outstanding with its third-party credit card vendors at any point. The Company classifies these outstanding balances as credit card receivables. Construction allowances are recorded for certain store lease agreements for improvements completed by the Company. VAT receivables are payments the Company has made on purchases of goods and services that will be recovered as sales are made to customers.
INVENTORIES
During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012, the Company elected to change its inventory valuation method from the lower of cost or market utilizing the retail method to the lower of cost or market under the weighted average cost method. The Company believes the new method is preferable as it is consistent with the practices of other specialty retailers and better aligns with the way the Company manages its business with a focus on the actual margin realized. See Note 4, “
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
,” for further details on the accounting change.
Inventories are principally valued at the lower of cost or market on a weighted-average cost basis. The Company writes down inventory through a lower of cost or market adjustment, the impact of which is reflected in cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. This adjustment is based on management's judgment
52
regarding future demand and market conditions and analysis of historical experience. The lower of cost or market adjustment to inventory as of February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011 was
$9.9 million
,
$13.0 million
and
$10.2 million
, respectively.
Additionally, as part of inventory valuation, inventory shrinkage estimates based on historical trends from actual physical inventories are made each period that reduce the inventory value for lost or stolen items. The Company performs physical inventories on a periodic basis and adjusts the shrink reserve accordingly. The shrink reserve was
$11.8 million
,
$10.3 million
and
$9.1 million
at
February 2, 2013
,
January 28, 2012
and
January 29, 2011
, respectively.
Ending inventory balances were
$427.0 million
,
$679.9 million
and
$464.6 million
at
February 2, 2013
,
January 28, 2012
and
January 29, 2011
, respectively. These balances included inventory in transit balances of
$34.8 million
,
$103.1 million
and
$55.0 million
at
February 2, 2013
,
January 28, 2012
and
January 29, 2011
, respectively. Inventory in transit is considered to be all merchandise owned by Abercrombie & Fitch that has not yet been received at an Abercrombie & Fitch distribution center.
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Other current assets include prepaid rent, current store supplies, derivative contracts and other prepaids.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment are computed for financial reporting purposes on a straight-line basis, using service lives which are principally:
30 years
for buildings; from
three
to
15 years
for leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures; from
three
to
seven years
for information technology; and from
three
to
20 years
for other property and equipment; or lease term, whichever is shorter. The cost of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts with any resulting gain or loss included in net income. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major remodels and improvements that extend service lives of the related assets are capitalized.
Long-lived assets, primarily comprised of property and equipment, are reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. The primary triggering events are (1) when the Company believes that it is more likely than not that long-lived assets will be disposed of before the end of their previously estimated useful life (e.g., store closures before the end of a lease) and (2) if the Company’s performance in any quarter indicates that there has been a long-term and significant change in the economics of the business. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairments in the quarter in which a triggering event occurs.
In addition, the Company conducts an annual impairment analysis in the fourth quarter of each year. For the purposes of the annual review, the Company reviews long-lived assets associated with stores that have an operating loss in the current year and have been open for at least two full years.
The reviews are conducted at the individual store level, which is the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities.
The impairment evaluation is performed as a two-step test. First, the Company utilizes an undiscounted future cash flow model to test the individual asset groups for recoverability. If the net carrying value of the asset group exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, the Company proceeds to step two. Under step two, an impairment loss is recognized for the excess of net book value over the fair value of the assets. Factors used in the evaluation include, but are not limited to, management’s plans for future operations, recent operating results and projected cash flows. See Note 9, “
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET,
” for further discussion.
The Company expenses all internal-use software costs incurred in the preliminary project stage and capitalizes certain direct costs associated with the development and purchase of internal-use software within property and equipment. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the software, generally not exceeding
seven
years.
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using current enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. Inherent in the measurement of deferred balances are certain judgments and interpretations of enacted tax law and published guidance with respect to applicability to the Company’s operations. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Currently, there is an immaterial valuation allowance provided for foreign net operating losses.
53
The Company records tax expense or benefit that does not relate to ordinary income in the current fiscal year discretely in the period in which it occurs. Examples of such types of discrete items include, but are not limited to: changes in estimates of the outcome of tax matters related to prior years; provision-to-return adjustments; tax-exempt income; and the settlement of tax audits.
See Note 15, “
INCOME TAXES,
” for a discussion regarding the Company’s policies for uncertain tax positions.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION AND TRANSACTIONS
The majority of the Company’s international operations use local currencies as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. Dollars (the reporting currency) at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Equity accounts denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. Dollars at historical exchange rates. Revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. Dollars at the monthly average exchange rate for the period. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the results of operations; whereas, translation adjustments and inter-company loans of a long-term investment nature are reported as an element of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Foreign currency transactions resulted in a
gain
of
$3.3 million
for Fiscal 2012, a
gain
of
$1.3 million
for Fiscal 2011 and an immaterial gain for Fiscal 2010.
DERIVATIVES
See Note 18, “
DERIVATIVES.
”
CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of business, the Company must make estimates of potential future legal obligations and liabilities, which requires the use of management’s judgment on the outcome of various issues. Management may also use outside legal advice to assist in the estimating process. However, the ultimate outcome of various legal issues could be different than management estimates, and adjustments may be required. See Note 21, “
CONTINGENCIES,
” for further discussion.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
At
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
, there were
150.0 million
shares of A&F’s Class A Common Stock,
$0.01
par value, authorized, of which
78.4 million
and
85.6 million
shares were outstanding at
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
, respectively, and
106.4 million
shares of Class B Common Stock,
$0.01
par value, authorized,
none
of which were outstanding at
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
. In addition,
15.0 million
shares of A&F’s Preferred Stock,
$0.01
par value, were authorized,
none
of which have been issued. See Note 23, “
PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS
” for information about Preferred Stock Purchase Rights.
Holders of Class A Common Stock generally have identical rights to holders of Class B Common Stock, except holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to
one
vote per share while holders of Class B Common Stock are entitled to
three
votes per share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes store sales at the time the customer takes possession of the merchandise. Direct-to-consumer sales are recorded based on an estimated date for customer receipt of merchandise, which is based on shipping terms and historical delivery terms. Amounts relating to shipping and handling billed to customers in a sale transaction are classified as revenue and the related direct shipping and handling costs are classified as Stores and Distribution Expense. Associate discounts are classified as a reduction of net sales. The Company reserves for sales returns through estimates based on historical experience. The sales return reserve was
$9.3 million
,
$7.0 million
and
$10.3 million
at
February 2, 2013
,
January 28, 2012
and
January 29, 2011
, respectively.
The Company sells gift cards in its stores and through direct-to-consumer operations. The Company accounts for gift cards sold to customers by recognizing a liability at the time of sale. Gift cards sold to customers do not expire or lose value over periods of inactivity. The liability remains on the Company’s books until the Company recognizes income from gift cards. Income from gift cards is recognized at the earlier of redemption by the customer (recognized as revenue) or when the Company determines that the likelihood of redemption is remote, referred to as “gift card breakage” (recognized as other operating income). The Company determines the probability of the gift card being redeemed to be remote based on historical redemption patterns. At
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
, the gift card liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets were
$47.7 million
.
54
The Company is not required by law to escheat the value of unredeemed gift cards to the states in which it operates. During Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal
2010
, the Company recognized other operating income for gift card breakage of
$6.9 million
,
$7.2 million
and
$7.8 million
, respectively.
The Company does not include tax amounts collected as part of the sales transaction in its net sales results.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
Cost of goods sold is primarily comprised of: cost incurred to ready inventory for sale, including product costs, freight, and import cost, as well as changes in reserves for shrink and lower of cost or market reserves. Gains and losses associated with foreign currency exchange contracts related to hedging of inventory purchases are also recognized in cost of goods sold when the inventory being hedged is sold.
STORES AND DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE
Stores and distribution expense includes store payroll, store management, rent, utilities and other landlord expenses, depreciation and amortization, repairs and maintenance and other store support functions, as well as Direct-to-Consumer expense and Distribution Center (“DC”) expense.
Shipping and handling costs, including costs incurred to store, move and prepare products for shipment, and costs incurred to physically move the product to the customer, associated with direct-to-consumer operations were
$78.6 million
,
$53.6 million
and
$38.9 million
for Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal
2010
, respectively. Handling costs, including costs incurred to store, move and prepare the products for shipment to the stores were
$59.4 million
,
$62.8 million
and
$42.8 million
for Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal
2010
, respectively. These amounts are recorded in Stores and Distribution Expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. Costs incurred to physically move the product to the stores is recorded in Cost of Goods Sold in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
MARKETING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
Marketing, general and administrative expense includes: photography and media ads; store marketing; home office compensation, except for those departments included in stores and distribution expense; information technology; outside services such as legal and consulting; relocation; recruiting; samples and travel expenses.
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE (INCOME), NET
Other operating expense (income) consists primarily of the following: income related to gift card balances whose likelihood of redemption has been determined to be remote; gains and losses on foreign currency transactions; business interruption insurance recoveries; and the net impact of the change in valuation related to other-than-temporary impairments associated with auction rate securities ("ARS"). See Note 7, “
INVESTMENTS
.”
WEBSITE AND ADVERTISING COSTS
Website and advertising costs related to direct-to-consumer operations are expensed as incurred as a component of Stores and Distribution Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
LEASES
The Company leases property for its stores under operating leases. Lease agreements may contain construction allowances, rent escalation clauses and/or contingent rent provisions.
For construction allowances, the Company records a deferred lease credit on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortizes the deferred lease credit as a reduction of rent expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income over the terms of the leases.
For scheduled rent escalation clauses during the lease terms, the Company records minimum rental expense on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. The difference between the rent expense and the amount payable under the lease is included in Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The term of the lease over which the Company amortizes construction allowances and minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis begins on the date of initial possession, which is generally when the Company enters the space and begins construction.
55
Certain leases provide for contingent rents, which are determined as a percentage of gross sales. The Company records a contingent rent liability in Accrued Expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the corresponding rent expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income when management determines that achieving the specified levels during the fiscal year is probable. In addition, most of the leases require payment of real estate taxes, insurance and certain common area maintenance costs in addition to the future minimum lease payments.
In certain lease arrangements, the Company is involved with the construction of the building. If the Company determines that it has substantially all of the risks of ownership during construction of the leased property and therefore is deemed to be the owner of the construction project, the Company records an asset for the amount of the total project costs and an amount related to the value attributed to the pre-existing leased building in Property and Equipment, Net and the related financing obligation in Leasehold Financing Obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Once construction is complete, the Company determines if the asset qualifies for sale-leaseback accounting treatment. If the arrangement does not qualify for sale-lease back treatment, the Company continues to amortize the obligation over the lease term and depreciates the asset over its useful life. The Company does not report rent expense for the portion of the rent payment determined to be related to the assets which are owned for accounting purposes. Rather, this portion of the rent payment under the lease is recognized as a reduction of the financing obligation and interest expense.
The Company recorded a cumulative correction during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2011 relating to four specific leasing transactions to recognize approximately
$33.0 million
of long-lived assets and a corresponding financing obligation. In connection with the cumulative correction during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2011, the Company reversed
$1.2 million
of previously recognized expense, primarily rent expense, of which
$1.1 million
related to reversal of expense recognized during the first three quarters of Fiscal 2011. The Company does not believe the correction was material to any current or prior interim or annual periods that were affected.
STORE PRE-OPENING EXPENSES
Pre-opening expenses related to new store openings are charged to operations as incurred.
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Costs to design and develop the Company’s merchandise are expensed as incurred and are reflected as a component of “Marketing, General and Administrative Expense.”
NET INCOME PER SHARE
Net income per basic share is computed based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock (“Common Stock”). Net income per diluted share includes the weighted-average effect of dilutive stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units.
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding and Anti-Dilutive Shares (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Shares of Common Stock issued
|
103,300
|
|
103,300
|
|
103,300
|
|
||
|
Treasury shares
|
(21,360
|
)
|
(16,452
|
)
|
(15,239
|
)
|
||
|
Weighted-Average — basic shares
|
81,940
|
|
86,848
|
|
88,061
|
|
||
|
Dilutive effect of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units
|
1,235
|
|
2,689
|
|
1,790
|
|
||
|
Weighted-Average — diluted shares
|
83,175
|
|
89,537
|
|
89,851
|
|
||
|
Anti-Dilutive shares
(1)
|
5,228
|
|
2,452
|
|
6,019
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
Reflects the number of shares subject to outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units, but excluded from the computation of net income per diluted share because the impact would be anti-dilutive.
|
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
See Note 5, “
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
.”
56
USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Since actual results may differ from those estimates, the Company revises its estimates and assumptions as new information becomes available.
4. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
The Company elected to change its method of accounting for inventory from the lower of cost or market utilizing the retail method to the weighted average cost method effective February 2, 2013. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, all periods have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of the change to the weighted average cost method. The Company believes that accounting under the weighted average cost method is preferable as it better aligns with the Company's focus on realized selling margin and improves the comparability of the Company's financial results with those of its competitors. Additionally, it will improve the matching of cost of goods sold with the related net sales and reflect the acquisition cost of inventory outstanding at each balance sheet date. The cumulative adjustment as of January 30, 2010, was an increase in its inventory of
$73.6 million
and an increase in retained earnings of
$47.3 million
.
As a result of the retroactive application of the change in accounting for inventory, the following items in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows have been restated:
Fiscal Year Ended January 28, 2012 (in thousands, except per share data)
|
As Reported
|
Effect of Change
|
As Restated
|
|||||||||
|
Net Sales
|
$
|
4,158,058
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4,158,058
|
|
||
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
1,639,188
|
|
(31,354
|
)
|
1,607,834
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Profit
|
2,518,870
|
|
31,354
|
|
2,550,224
|
|
|||||
|
Operating Income
|
190,030
|
|
31,354
|
|
221,384
|
|
|||||
|
Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes
|
186,453
|
|
31,354
|
|
217,807
|
|
|||||
|
Tax Expense for Continuing Operations
|
59,591
|
|
15,078
|
|
74,669
|
|
|||||
|
Net Income from Continuing Operations
|
126,862
|
|
16,276
|
|
143,138
|
|
|||||
|
Net Income
|
127,658
|
|
16,276
|
|
143,934
|
|
|||||
|
Net Income Per Share from Continuing Operations:
|
|||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
||
|
Net Income Per Share:
|
|||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
||
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
(8,655
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
(8,658
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
12,971
|
|
(3
|
)
|
12,968
|
||||||
|
Comprehensive Income
|
140,629
|
|
16,273
|
|
156,902
|
||||||
|
As Reported
|
Effect of Change
|
As Restated
|
|||||||||
|
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$
|
127,658
|
|
$
|
16,276
|
|
$
|
143,934
|
|
||
|
Deferred Taxes
|
(46,330
|
)
|
15,078
|
|
(31,252
|
)
|
|||||
|
Inventories
|
(184,784
|
)
|
(31,349
|
)
|
(216,133
|
)
|
|||||
57
Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2011 (in thousands, except per share data)
|
As Reported
|
Effect of Change
|
As Restated
|
|||||||||
|
Net Sales
|
$
|
3,468,777
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,468,777
|
|
||
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
1,256,596
|
|
(5,248
|
)
|
1,251,348
|
|
|||||
|
Gross Profit
|
2,212,181
|
|
5,248
|
|
2,217,429
|
|
|||||
|
Operating Income
|
231,932
|
|
5,248
|
|
237,180
|
|
|||||
|
Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes
|
228,570
|
|
5,248
|
|
233,818
|
|
|||||
|
Tax Expense for Continuing Operations
|
78,287
|
|
(178
|
)
|
78,109
|
|
|||||
|
Net Income from Continuing Operations
|
150,283
|
|
5,426
|
|
155,709
|
|
|||||
|
Net Income
|
150,283
|
|
5,426
|
|
155,709
|
|
|||||
|
Net Income Per Share from Continuing Operations:
|
|||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
||
|
Net Income Per Share:
|
|||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
||
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
3,399
|
|
$
|
(161
|
)
|
$
|
3,238
|
|
|||
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
2,457
|
|
$
|
(161
|
)
|
$
|
2,296
|
|
|||
|
Comprehensive Income
|
152,740
|
|
$
|
5,265
|
|
$
|
158,005
|
|
|||
|
|
As Reported
|
Effect of Change
|
As Restated
|
||||||||
|
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$
|
150,283
|
|
$
|
5,426
|
|
$
|
155,709
|
|
||
|
Deferred Taxes
|
(27,823
|
)
|
(178
|
)
|
(28,001
|
)
|
|||||
|
Inventories
|
(74,689
|
)
|
(5,180
|
)
|
(79,869
|
)
|
|||||
As a result of the retroactive application of the change in accounting for inventories, the following items in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets have been restated:
January 28, 2012 (in thousands)
:
|
As Reported
|
Effect of Change
|
As Restated
|
|||||||||
|
Inventories
|
$
|
569,818
|
|
$
|
110,117
|
|
$
|
679,935
|
|
||
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
77,120
|
|
(41,238
|
)
|
35,882
|
|
|||||
|
Total Current Assets
|
1,488,775
|
|
68,879
|
|
1,557,654
|
|
|||||
|
Total Assets
|
3,048,153
|
|
68,879
|
|
3,117,032
|
|
|||||
|
Retained Earnings
|
2,320,571
|
|
69,043
|
|
2,389,614
|
|
|||||
|
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
1,862,456
|
|
68,879
|
|
1,931,335
|
|
|||||
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
3,048,153
|
|
68,879
|
|
3,117,032
|
|
|||||
58
|
5.
|
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
|
Financial Statement Impact
The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of
$52.9 million
,
$51.1 million
and
$40.6 million
for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively. The Company also recognized
$20.1 million
,
$19.2 million
and
$14.7 million
in tax benefits related to share-based compensation for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively.
The fair value of share-based compensation awards is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the awards’ requisite service period, net of forfeitures. For awards that are expected to result in a tax deduction, a deferred tax asset is recorded in the period in which share-based compensation expense is recognized. A current tax deduction arises upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights and is principally measured at the award’s intrinsic value. If the tax deduction is greater than the recorded deferred tax asset, the tax benefit associated with any excess deduction is considered a “windfall tax benefit” and is recognized as additional paid-in capital. If the tax deduction is less than the recorded deferred tax asset, the resulting difference, or shortfall, is first charged to additional paid-in capital, to the extent of the pool of “windfall tax benefits,” with any remainder recognized as tax expense. The Company’s pool of “windfall tax benefits” as of
February 2, 2013
, is sufficient to fully absorb any shortfall which may develop associated with awards currently outstanding.
Share-based compensation expense is recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis. The Company adjusts share-based compensation expense on a quarterly basis for actual forfeitures and for changes to the estimate of expected award forfeitures based on actual forfeiture experience. The effect of adjusting the forfeiture rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed. The effect of adjustments for forfeitures was
$1.3 million
,
$1.6 million
and
$4.5 million
for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively.
A&F issues shares of Common Stock for stock option and stock appreciation right exercises and restricted stock unit vestings from treasury stock. As of
February 2, 2013
, A&F had sufficient treasury stock available to settle stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units outstanding without having to repurchase additional shares of Common Stock. Settlement of stock awards in Common Stock also requires that the Company has sufficient shares available in stockholder-approved plans at the applicable time.
In the event, at each reporting date during which share-based compensation awards remain outstanding, there are not sufficient shares of Common Stock available to be issued under the Amended and Restated Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2007 LTIP”) and the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2005 LTIP”), or under a successor or replacement plan, the Company may be required to designate some portion of the outstanding awards to be settled in cash, which would result in liability classification of such awards. The fair value of liability-classified awards is re-measured each reporting date until such awards no longer remain outstanding or until sufficient shares of Common Stock become available to be issued under the 2007 LTIP, or under a successor or replacement plan. As long as the awards are required to be classified as a liability, the change in fair value would be recognized in current period expense based on the requisite service period rendered.
Plans
As of
February 2, 2013
, A&F had
two
primary share-based compensation plans: the 2005 LTIP, under which A&F grants stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units to associates of the Company and non-associate members of the A&F Board of Directors, and the 2007 LTIP, under which A&F grants stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units to associates of the Company. A&F also has
four
other share-based compensation plans under which it granted stock options and restricted stock units to associates of the Company and non-associate members of the A&F Board of Directors in prior years.
The 2007 LTIP, a stockholder-approved plan, permits A&F to annually grant awards covering up to
2.0 million
of underlying shares of A&F’s Common Stock for each type of award, per eligible participant, plus any unused annual limit from prior years. The 2005 LTIP, a stockholder-approved plan, permits A&F to annually grant awards covering up to
250,000
of underlying shares of A&F’s Common Stock for each award type to any associate of the Company (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (the "CEO") ) who is subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, at the time of the grant, plus any unused annual limit from prior years. In addition, any non-associate director of A&F is eligible to receive awards under the 2005 LTIP. Under both plans, stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units vest primarily over
four years
for associates. Under the 2005 LTIP, restricted stock units typically vest after approximately
one year
for non-associate directors of A&F. Awards granted to the CEO under the 2007 LTIP have a vesting period defined as the shorter of
four years
or the period from the award date through the end of the CEO's employment agreement subject to the
59
satisfaction of performance-based criteria for awards granted subsequent to May 7, 2012. Under both plans, stock options have a
ten
-year term and stock appreciation rights have up to a
ten
-year term, subject to forfeiture under the terms of the plans. The plans provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change of control as defined in the plans.
Fair Value Estimates
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options and stock appreciation rights granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the Company to estimate the expected term of the stock options and stock appreciation rights and expected future stock price volatility over the expected term. Estimates of expected terms, which represent the expected periods of time the Company believes stock options and stock appreciation rights will be outstanding, are based on historical experience. Estimates of expected future stock price volatility are based on the volatility of A&F’s Common Stock price for the most recent historical period equal to the expected term of the stock option or stock appreciation right, as appropriate. The Company calculates the volatility as the annualized standard deviation of the differences in the natural logarithms of the weekly stock closing price, adjusted for stock splits and dividends.
In the case of restricted stock units, the Company calculates the fair value of the restricted stock units granted using the market price of the underlying Common Stock on the date of grant adjusted for anticipated dividend payments during the vesting period.
Stock Options
The Company did not grant any stock options during Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal
2010
.
Below is a summary of stock option activity for Fiscal
2012
:
|
Stock Options
|
Number of
Underlying
Shares
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
||||||||
|
Outstanding at January 28, 2012
|
714,997
|
|
$
|
60.72
|
|
|||||||
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(99,122
|
)
|
27.02
|
|
||||||||
|
Forfeited or expired
|
(46,475
|
)
|
75.27
|
|
||||||||
|
Outstanding at February 2, 2013
|
569,400
|
|
$
|
65.40
|
|
$
|
2,282,298
|
|
4.3
|
|||
|
Stock options exercisable at February 2, 2013
|
568,400
|
|
$
|
65.47
|
|
$
|
2,254,098
|
|
4.3
|
|||
|
Stock options expected to become exercisable in the future as of February 2, 2013
|
996
|
|
$
|
22.87
|
|
$
|
28,078
|
|
6.0
|
|||
The total intrinsic value of stock options which were exercised during Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal 2010 was
$2.0 million
,
$48.5 million
and
$10.7 million
, respectively.
The grant date fair value of stock options that vested during Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal 2010 was
$1.3 million
,
$2.4 million
and
$4.0 million
, respectively.
As of
February 2, 2013
, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options.
60
Stock Appreciation Rights
The weighted-average estimated fair value of stock appreciation rights granted during Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, and the weighted-average assumptions used in calculating such fair value, on the date of grant, were as follows:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Other Executive Officers
|
All Other Associates
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grant date market price
|
—
|
|
$
|
56.86
|
|
$
|
44.86
|
|
$
|
52.89
|
|
$
|
54.87
|
|
$
|
44.86
|
|
$
|
51.31
|
|
$
|
55.12
|
|
$
|
44.32
|
|
||||||||
|
Exercise price
|
—
|
|
$
|
56.86
|
|
$
|
44.86
|
|
$
|
52.89
|
|
$
|
54.87
|
|
$
|
44.86
|
|
$
|
51.31
|
|
$
|
55.12
|
|
$
|
44.32
|
|
||||||||
|
Fair value
|
—
|
|
$
|
22.99
|
|
$
|
16.96
|
|
$
|
23.53
|
|
$
|
22.29
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
$
|
21.90
|
|
$
|
21.98
|
|
$
|
16.51
|
|
||||||||
|
Assumptions:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Price volatility
|
—
|
|
53
|
%
|
50
|
%
|
56
|
%
|
53
|
%
|
51
|
%
|
61
|
%
|
55
|
%
|
53
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Expected term (years)
|
—
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.7
|
|
5.0
|
|
4.7
|
|
4.5
|
|
4.1
|
|
4.1
|
|
4.1
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
—
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
2.3
|
%
|
1.3
|
%
|
2.0
|
%
|
2.3
|
%
|
0.9
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
2.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Dividend yield
|
—
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
2.1
|
%
|
1.1
|
%
|
1.6
|
%
|
2.1
|
%
|
1.2
|
%
|
1.6
|
%
|
2.1
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Below is a summary of stock appreciation rights activity for Fiscal
2012
:
|
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
Number of
Underlying
Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
||||||||
|
Outstanding at January 28, 2012
|
9,039,334
|
|
$
|
39.66
|
|
|||||||
|
Granted:
|
||||||||||||
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Other Executive Officers
|
212,500
|
|
52.89
|
|
||||||||
|
All Other Associates
|
151,300
|
|
51.31
|
|
||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(63,150
|
)
|
30.27
|
|
||||||||
|
Forfeited or expired
|
(93,125
|
)
|
44.61
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Outstanding at February 2, 2013
|
9,246,859
|
|
$
|
40.17
|
|
$
|
114,456,670
|
|
4.3
|
|||
|
Stock appreciation rights exercisable at February 2, 2013
|
2,134,871
|
|
$
|
42.55
|
|
$
|
21,259,648
|
|
4.8
|
|||
|
Stock appreciation rights expected to become exercisable in the future as of February 2, 2013
|
7,057,622
|
|
$
|
39.38
|
|
$
|
93,026,530
|
|
4.1
|
|||
The total intrinsic value of stock appreciation rights exercised during Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal 2010 was
$0.9 million
,
$11.0 million
and
$1.8 million
, respectively.
The grant date fair value of stock appreciation rights that vested during Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal 2010 was
$24.1 million
,
$11.3 million
and
$5.0 million
, respectively.
As of
February 2, 2013
, there was
$41.6 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock appreciation rights. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
six months
.
Restricted Stock Units
Below is a summary of restricted stock unit activity for Fiscal
2012
:
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
Number of Underlying
Shares
|
Weighted-Average Grant
Date Fair Value
|
||||
|
Non-vested at January 28, 2012
|
1,189,292
|
|
$
|
49.11
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
625,615
|
|
48.07
|
|
||
|
Vested
|
(374,352
|
)
|
52.18
|
|
||
|
Forfeited
|
(241,875
|
)
|
52.82
|
|
||
|
Non-vested at February 2, 2013
|
1,198,680
|
|
$
|
46.88
|
|
|
61
The total fair value of restricted stock units granted during Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal 2010 was
$30.1 million
,
$31.2 million
and
$17.9 million
, respectively.
The total grant date fair value of restricted stock units and restricted shares which vested during Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
and Fiscal 2010 was
$19.5 million
,
$24.3 million
and
$24.3 million
, respectively.
As of
February 2, 2013
, there was
$38.9 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock units. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
six months
.
6. CASH AND EQUIVALENTS
Cash and equivalents consisted of (in thousands):
|
February 2, 2013
|
January 28, 2012
|
||||||
|
Cash and equivalents:
|
|||||||
|
Cash
|
$
|
398,508
|
|
$
|
374,479
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
244,997
|
|
209,016
|
|
|||
|
Total cash and equivalents
|
$
|
643,505
|
|
$
|
583,495
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents include amounts on deposit with financial institutions, United States treasury bills, and other investments, primarily held in money market accounts, with original maturities of less than
three months
. Any cash that is legally restricted from use is recorded in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The restricted cash balance was
$31.1 million
on
February 2, 2013
and
$30.0 million
on
January 28, 2012
. Restricted cash includes various cash deposits with international banks that are used as collateral for customary non-debt banking commitments and deposits into trust accounts to conform with standard insurance security requirements.
7. INVESTMENTS
Investments consisted of (in thousands):
|
February 2, 2013
|
January 28, 2012
|
||||||
|
Marketable securities:
|
|||||||
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|||||||
|
Auction rate securities — student loan backed
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
84,650
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities — municipal authority bonds
|
—
|
|
14,858
|
|
|||
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
—
|
|
99,508
|
|
|||
|
Rabbi Trust assets:
(1)
|
|||||||
|
Money market funds
|
22
|
|
23
|
|
|||
|
Trust-owned life insurance policies (at cash surrender value)
|
87,575
|
|
85,126
|
|
|||
|
Total Rabbi Trust assets
|
87,597
|
|
85,149
|
|
|||
|
Total Investments
|
$
|
87,597
|
|
$
|
184,657
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Rabbi Trust assets are included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are restricted as to their use.
|
During Fiscal
2012
, the Company sold its remaining ARS. As of January 28, 2012, the Company held
$113 million
in par value of auction rate securities at a recorded fair value of
$99.5 million
. Based on the sale of the remaining ARS, the Company recorded a gain of
$2.5 million
for Fiscal
2012
.
The irrevocable rabbi trust (the “Rabbi Trust”) is intended to be used as a source of funds to match respective funding obligations to participants in the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan I, the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan II and the Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The Rabbi Trust assets are consolidated and recorded at fair value, with the exception of the trust-owned life insurance policies which are recorded at cash surrender value. The Rabbi Trust assets are included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are restricted as to their use as noted above. The change in cash surrender value of the trust-owned life insurance policies held in the Rabbi Trust resulted in realized gains of
$2.4 million
and
$2.5
62
million
for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively, recorded as part of Interest Expense, Net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
|
8.
|
FAIR VALUE
|
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The inputs used to measure fair value are prioritized based on a three-level hierarchy. The three levels of inputs to measure fair value are as follows:
|
•
|
Level 1 — inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities that are available in active markets.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 — inputs are other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for assets or liabilities, directly or indirectly.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 — inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable.
|
The lowest level of significant input determines the placement of the entire fair value measurement in the hierarchy. The three levels of the hierarchy and the distribution of the Company’s assets and liabilities, measured at fair value, within it were as follows:
|
|
Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value as of February 2, 2013
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
|
ASSETS:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Money market funds
(1)
|
$
|
245,019
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
245,019
|
|
|||
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
—
|
|
2,493
|
|
—
|
|
2,493
|
|
|||||||
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
245,019
|
|
$
|
2,493
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
247,512
|
|
|||
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
—
|
|
9,987
|
|
—
|
|
9,987
|
|
|||||||
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
9,987
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
9,987
|
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Includes
$245.0 million
of money market funds included in Cash and Equivalents. Amounts held in the Rabbi Trust were immaterial.
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value as of January 28, 2012
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
|
ASSETS:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Money market funds
(1)
|
$
|
209,039
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
209,039
|
|
|||
|
ARS — available-for-sale — student loan backed
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
84,650
|
|
84,650
|
|
|||||||
|
ARS — available-for-sale — municipal authority bonds
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
14,858
|
|
14,858
|
|
|||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
—
|
|
10,770
|
|
—
|
|
10,770
|
|
|||||||
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
209,039
|
|
$
|
10,770
|
|
$
|
99,508
|
|
$
|
319,317
|
|
|||
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
—
|
|
1,458
|
|
—
|
|
1,458
|
|
|||||||
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,458
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,458
|
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Includes
$209.0 million
of money market funds included in Cash and Equivalents. Amounts held in the Rabbi Trust were immaterial.
|
The level 2 assets and liabilities consist of derivative financial instruments, primarily forward foreign exchange contracts. The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined by using quoted market prices of the same or similar instruments, adjusted for counterparty risk.
The level 3 assets included available-for-sale investments in insured student loan backed ARS and insured municipal authority bond ARS.
63
The table below includes a roll-forward of the Company’s level 3 assets and liabilities from
January 28, 2012
to
February 2, 2013
. When a determination is made to classify an asset or liability within level 3, the determination is based upon the lack of significance of the observable parameters to the overall fair value measurement. However, the fair value determination for level 3 financial assets and liabilities may include observable components.
|
Available-for-sale
ARS - Student Loans
|
Available-for-sale
ARS - Muni Bonds
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
||||||||
|
Fair value, January 28, 2012
|
$
|
84,650
|
|
$
|
14,858
|
|
$
|
99,508
|
|
||
|
Dispositions
|
(85,524
|
)
|
(16,439
|
)
|
(101,963
|
)
|
|||||
|
Gains and (losses), net:
|
|||||||||||
|
Reported in Net Income
|
874
|
|
1,581
|
|
2,455
|
|
|||||
|
Fair value, February 2, 2013
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
9.
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
Property and equipment, net, consisted of (in thousands):
|
February 2, 2013
|
January 28, 2012
|
||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
36,890
|
|
$
|
36,890
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
297,243
|
|
267,566
|
|
|||
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
707,061
|
|
614,641
|
|
|||
|
Information technology
|
289,656
|
|
237,245
|
|
|||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
1,449,568
|
|
1,340,487
|
|
|||
|
Construction in progress
|
90,573
|
|
113,663
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
44,081
|
|
44,727
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,915,072
|
|
$
|
2,655,219
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(1,606,840
|
)
|
(1,457,948
|
)
|
|||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
1,308,232
|
|
$
|
1,197,271
|
|
|
Long-lived assets, primarily comprised of property and equipment, are reviewed periodically for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Factors used in the evaluation include, but are not limited to, management’s plans for future operations, recent operating results, and projected cash flows.
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal
2012
, as a result of the fiscal year-end review of long-lived store-related assets, the Company incurred store-related asset impairment charges of
$7.4 million
included in Stores and Distribution Expense on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2012. The asset impairment charge was primarily related to
one
Abercrombie & Fitch,
three
abercrombie kids,
12
Hollister, and
one
Gilly Hicks store.
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2011, as a result of the fiscal year-end review of long-lived store-related assets, the Company incurred store-related asset impairment charges of
$68.0 million
, included in Stores and Distribution Expense on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2011. The asset impairment charge was related to
14
Abercrombie & Fitch,
21
abercrombie kids,
42
Hollister, and
two
Gilly Hicks stores.
In Fiscal 2010, as a result of the review of long-lived store-related assets, the Company incurred store-related asset impairment charges of
$50.6 million
, included in Stores and Distribution Expense on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2010. The asset impairment charge was primarily related to
13
Gilly Hicks stores. The charge also included
two
Abercrombie & Fitch,
two
abercrombie kids and
nine
Hollister stores.
Store-related assets are considered level 3 assets in the fair value hierarchy and the fair values were determined at the individual store level, primarily using a discounted cash flow model. The estimation of future cash flows from operating activities requires significant estimates of factors that include future sales, gross margin performance and operating expenses. In instances where the discounted cash flow analysis indicated a negative value at the store level, the market exit price based on
64
historical experience was used to determine the fair value by asset type. Included in property and equipment, net, are store-related assets previously impaired and measured at a fair value of
$10.2 million
and
$13.1 million
, net of accumulated depreciation, as of
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
, respectively.
The following table presents quantitative information related to the unobservable inputs used in the Company's level 3 fair value measurements for the impairment loss incurred in Fiscal 2012.
|
UNOBSERVABLE INPUT
|
VALUE
|
|
Weighted average cost of capital
(1)
|
12%
|
|
Annual revenue growth rates
(2)
|
2%
|
|
(1)
|
The Company utilized the year-end weighted average cost of capital in the discounted cash flow model.
|
|
(2)
|
The Company utilized an annual revenue growth rate in the discounted cash flow model.
|
In certain lease arrangements, the Company is involved with the construction of the building. If the Company determines that it has substantially all of the risks of ownership during construction of the leased property and therefore is deemed to be the owner of the construction project, the Company records an asset for the amount of the total project costs and an amount related to the value attributed to the pre-existing leased building in Property and Equipment, Net and the related financing obligation in Leasehold Financing Obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Once construction is complete, the Company determines if the asset qualifies for sale-leaseback accounting treatment. If the arrangement does not qualify for sale-lease back treatment, the Company continues to depreciate the asset over its useful life. The Company had
$55.2 million
and
$47.5 million
of construction project assets in Property and Equipment, Net at
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
, respectively.
|
10.
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
Other assets consisted of (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Rabbi Trust
|
$
|
87,597
|
|
$
|
85,149
|
|
|
|
Long-term deposits
|
71,486
|
|
78,617
|
|
|||
|
Non-current deferred tax assets
|
50,387
|
|
29,165
|
|
|||
|
Long-term supplies
|
42,404
|
|
36,739
|
|
|||
|
Restricted cash
|
31,137
|
|
30,043
|
|
|||
|
Intellectual property
|
30,811
|
|
31,760
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid income tax on intercompany items
|
19,217
|
|
16,049
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
38,306
|
|
39,727
|
|
|||
|
Other assets
|
$
|
371,345
|
|
$
|
347,249
|
|
|
Restricted cash includes various cash deposits with international banks that are used as collateral for customary non-debt banking commitments and deposits into trust accounts to conform to standard insurance security requirements. Long-term supplies include, but are not limited to, hangers, frames, sign holders, security tags, back-room supplies, and construction materials. Other includes prepaid leases and various other assets.
|
11.
|
DEFERRED LEASE CREDITS
|
Deferred lease credits are derived from payments received from landlords to wholly or partially offset store construction costs and are classified between current and long-term liabilities. The amounts, which are amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the respective lives of the related leases, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
February 2,
2013 |
January 28,
2012 |
||||||
|
Deferred lease credits
|
$
|
550,527
|
|
$
|
551,468
|
|
|
|
Amortized deferred lease credits
|
(343,076
|
)
|
(327,399
|
)
|
|||
|
Total deferred lease credits, net
|
$
|
207,451
|
|
$
|
224,069
|
|
|
65
12. LEASED FACILITIES
Annual store rent is comprised of a fixed minimum amount and/or contingent rent based on a percentage of sales. For scheduled rent escalation clauses during the lease terms, the Company records minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. The term of the lease over which the Company amortizes construction allowances and minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis begins on the date of initial possession.
Certain leases provide for contingent rents, which are primarily determined as a percentage of sales in excess of a predetermined level. The Company records a contingent rent liability in Accrued Expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the corresponding rent expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income when the Company determines that it is probable that the expense has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Store lease terms may also require additional payments covering taxes, common area costs and certain other expenses.
A summary of rent expense follows (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Store rent:
|
|||||||||||
|
Fixed minimum
|
$
|
414,061
|
|
$
|
388,004
|
|
$
|
333,419
|
|
||
|
Contingent
|
16,828
|
|
16,942
|
|
9,306
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred lease credits amortization
|
(45,926
|
)
|
(48,219
|
)
|
(48,373
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total store rent expense
|
384,963
|
|
356,727
|
|
294,352
|
|
|||||
|
Buildings, equipment and other
|
6,259
|
|
4,719
|
|
4,988
|
|
|||||
|
Total rent expense
|
$
|
391,222
|
|
$
|
361,446
|
|
$
|
299,340
|
|
||
At
February 2, 2013
, the Company was committed to non-cancelable leases with remaining terms of
one
to
18 years
. Excluded from the obligations below are amounts related to portions of lease terms that are currently cancelable at the Company's discretion. While included in the obligations below, in many instances, the Company has options to terminate certain leases if stated sales volume levels are not met or the Company ceases operations in a given country. A summary of operating lease commitments, including
$71.7 million
of leasehold financing obligations and related interest as discussed in Note 17, under non-cancelable leases follows (in thousands):
|
Fiscal 2013
|
$
|
418,478
|
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
$
|
391,925
|
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
$
|
361,257
|
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
$
|
343,337
|
|
|
Fiscal 2017
|
$
|
242,735
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
$
|
868,479
|
|
|
13.
|
ACCRUED EXPENSES
|
Accrued expenses consisted of (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Accrued payroll and related costs
|
$
|
74,747
|
|
$
|
57,633
|
|
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
56,219
|
|
68,138
|
|
|||
|
Gift card liability
|
47,683
|
|
47,669
|
|
|||
|
Accrued rent
|
36,861
|
|
33,966
|
|
|||
|
Construction in progress
|
34,732
|
|
47,526
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
145,492
|
|
114,141
|
|
|||
|
Accrued expenses
|
$
|
395,734
|
|
$
|
369,073
|
|
|
66
Accrued payroll and related costs include salaries, incentive compensation, benefits, withholdings and other payroll related costs. Other accrued expenses include expenses incurred but not yet paid related to outside services associated with store and home office operations.
|
14.
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
Other liabilities consisted of (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Accrued straight-line rent
|
$
|
119,057
|
|
$
|
114,136
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
93,211
|
|
84,573
|
|
|||
|
Uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties
|
16,047
|
|
19,496
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
17,678
|
|
27,213
|
|
|||
|
Other liabilities
|
$
|
245,993
|
|
$
|
245,418
|
|
|
Deferred compensation includes the Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Savings and Retirement Plan and the Abercrombie & Fitch Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan, all further discussed in Note 20, “
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
,” as well as deferred Board of Directors compensation and other accrued retirement benefits.
67
|
15.
|
INCOME TAXES
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes was comprised of (in thousands) (amounts restated due to change in accounting principle referenced in Note 4):
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
302,589
|
|
$
|
192,312
|
|
$
|
188,444
|
|
||
|
Foreign
|
64,356
|
|
25,495
|
|
45,374
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
366,945
|
|
$
|
217,807
|
|
$
|
233,818
|
|
||
Domestic income from continuing operations above includes intercompany charges to foreign affiliates for management fees, cost-sharing, royalties, including those related to international direct-to-consumer operations, and interest. The provision for tax expense from continuing operations consisted of (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
Current:
|
|||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
111,761
|
|
$
|
100,495
|
|
$
|
94,922
|
|
||
|
State
|
15,323
|
|
11,085
|
|
16,126
|
|
|||||
|
Foreign
|
17,984
|
|
13,262
|
|
11,395
|
|
|||||
|
$
|
145,068
|
|
$
|
124,842
|
|
$
|
122,443
|
|
|||
|
Deferred:
|
|||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
(10,456
|
)
|
$
|
(32,776
|
)
|
$
|
(33,441
|
)
|
||
|
State
|
458
|
|
(8,662
|
)
|
(7,299
|
)
|
|||||
|
Foreign
|
(5,136
|
)
|
(8,735
|
)
|
(3,594
|
)
|
|||||
|
$
|
(15,134
|
)
|
$
|
(50,173
|
)
|
$
|
(44,334
|
)
|
|||
|
Total provision
|
$
|
129,934
|
|
$
|
74,669
|
|
$
|
78,109
|
|
||
Reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rate for continuing operations is as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Federal income tax rate
|
35.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
||
|
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect
|
2.7
|
|
3.9
|
|
2.5
|
|
||
|
Tax effect of foreign earnings
|
(1.8
|
)
|
(3.0
|
)
|
(3.7
|
)
|
||
|
Other items, net
|
(0.5
|
)
|
(1.6
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
||
|
Total
|
35.4
|
%
|
34.3
|
%
|
33.4
|
%
|
||
Amounts paid directly to taxing authorities were
$122.7 million
,
$118.2 million
, and
$85.1 million
in Fiscal
2012
, Fiscal
2011
, and Fiscal
2010
, respectively.
68
The effect of temporary differences which gives rise to deferred income tax assets (liabilities) were as follows (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|||||||
|
Deferred compensation
|
$
|
83,529
|
|
$
|
69,296
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
18,971
|
|
20,356
|
|
|||
|
Rent
|
39,061
|
|
41,424
|
|
|||
|
Foreign net operating losses (NOLs)
|
12,107
|
|
11,687
|
|
|||
|
Reserves
|
6,698
|
|
7,669
|
|
|||
|
Realized and unrealized investment losses
|
592
|
|
5,565
|
|
|||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(158
|
)
|
(2,531
|
)
|
|||
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
$
|
160,800
|
|
$
|
153,466
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Property and equipment
|
(57,875
|
)
|
(70,961
|
)
|
|||
|
Inventory
|
(13,156
|
)
|
(8,164
|
)
|
|||
|
Store supplies
|
(9,990
|
)
|
(10,591
|
)
|
|||
|
Other
|
(2,140
|
)
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|||
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
$
|
(83,161
|
)
|
$
|
(90,961
|
)
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
$
|
77,639
|
|
$
|
62,505
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income is shown net of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, resulting in a deferred tax liability of
$0.8 million
and a deferred tax asset of
$1.6 million
for Fiscal
2012
and Fiscal
2011
, respectively. These deferred taxes are not reflected in the table above.
As of
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
, the Company had deferred tax assets related to foreign net operating loss carryovers that could be utilized to reduce future years’ tax liabilities, totaling
$12.1 million
and
$11.7 million
, respectively. A portion of these net operating loss carryovers begin expiring in the year 2016 and some have an indefinite carryforward period. Management believes it is more likely than not that these net operating loss carryovers will reduce future years’ tax liabilities in certain foreign jurisdictions less the associated valuation allowance. As of
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
, the foreign subsidiaries’ net operating valuation allowances were immaterial and
$2.5 million
, respectively.
No other valuation allowances have been provided for deferred tax assets because management believes that it is more likely than not that the full amount of the net deferred tax assets will be realized in the future.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of uncertain tax positions is as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
|
Uncertain tax positions, beginning of the year
|
$
|
13,404
|
|
$
|
14,827
|
|
$
|
29,437
|
|
||
|
Gross addition for tax positions of the current year
|
1,084
|
|
1,183
|
|
562
|
|
|||||
|
Gross addition for tax positions of prior years
|
227
|
|
1,602
|
|
1,734
|
|
|||||
|
Reductions of tax positions of prior years for:
|
|||||||||||
|
Lapses of applicable statutes of limitations
|
(2,053
|
)
|
(2,448
|
)
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|||||
|
Settlements during the period
|
(1,480
|
)
|
(1,631
|
)
|
(14,166
|
)
|
|||||
|
Changes in judgment
|
(66
|
)
|
(129
|
)
|
(412
|
)
|
|||||
|
Uncertain tax positions, end of year
|
$
|
11,116
|
|
$
|
13,404
|
|
$
|
14,827
|
|
||
The amount of the above uncertain tax positions at
February 2, 2013
,
January 28, 2012
and
January 29, 2011
which would impact the Company’s effective tax rate, if recognized, was
$11.1 million
,
$13.4 million
and
$14.8 million
, respectively.
69
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. Interest and penalties of
$4.9 million
had been accrued, at the end of Fiscal
2012
, compared to
$6.1 million
accrued at the end of Fiscal
2011
.
The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) is currently conducting an examination of the Company’s U.S. federal income tax return for Fiscal
2012
as part of the IRS’s Compliance Assurance Process program. IRS examinations for Fiscal
2011
and prior years have been completed and settled. State and foreign returns are generally subject to examination for a period of
three
to
five years
after the filing of the respective return. The Company has various state income tax returns in the process of examination or administrative appeals. The outcome of the examinations is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. The Company believes that some of these audits and negotiations will conclude within the next 12 months and that it is reasonably possible the amount of uncertain income tax positions, including interest, may decrease in the range of
$7 million
to
$12 million
within the next 12 months due to settlement of audits and expiration of statutes of limitations, and a range of
$2.5 million
to
$10 million
of which would reduce income tax expense.
The Company does not expect material adjustments to the total amount of uncertain tax positions within the next 12 months, but the outcome of tax matters is uncertain and unforeseen results can occur.
As of
February 2, 2013
, U.S. taxes have not been provided on approximately
$99.6 million
of unremitted earnings of subsidiaries operating outside of the United States. These earnings, which are considered to be invested indefinitely, would become subject to income tax if they were remitted as dividends or were lent to Abercrombie & Fitch or a U.S. affiliate, or if Abercrombie & Fitch were to sell its stock in the subsidiaries. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability on these unremitted earnings is not practicable because of the complexities associated with this hypothetical calculation.
|
16.
|
BORROWINGS
|
On July 28, 2011, the Company entered into an unsecured Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, made as of February 24, 2012, and Amendment No. 2, made as of January 23, 2013, (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) under which up to
$350 million
is available. As stated in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, the primary purposes of the agreement are for trade and stand-by letters of credit in the ordinary course of business, as well as to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and investments, and other general corporate purposes, including repurchases of A&F's Common Stock.
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement has several borrowing options, including interest rates that are based on: (i) a defined Base Rate, plus a margin based on the Leverage Ratio, payable quarterly; (ii) an Adjusted Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus a margin based on the Leverage Ratio, payable at the end of the applicable interest period for the borrowing and, for interest periods in excess of
three
months, on the date that is
three
months after the commencement of the interest period; or (iii) an Adjusted Foreign Currency Rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus a margin based on the Leverage Ratio, payable at the end of the applicable interest period for the borrowing and, for interest periods in excess of
three
months, on the date that is
three
months after the commencement of the interest period. The Base Rate represents a rate per annum equal to the highest of (a) PNC Bank, National Association’s then publicly announced prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Open Rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) as then in effect plus
1
/2 of
1.0%
or (c) the Daily Adjusted Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) as then in effect plus
1.0%
.
The facility fees payable under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are based on the Company’s Leverage Ratio (i.e., the ratio, on a consolidated basis, of (a) the sum of total debt (excluding specified permitted foreign bank guarantees and trade letters of credit) plus
600%
of forward minimum rent commitments to (b) consolidated earnings, as adjusted, before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (“Consolidated EBITDAR”) for the trailing
four
-consecutive-fiscal-quarter periods. The facility fees accrue at a rate of
0.125%
to
0.30%
per annum based on the Leverage Ratio for the most recent determination date. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement requires that the Leverage Ratio not be greater than
3.75
to 1.00 at the end of each testing period. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also requires that the “Coverage Ratio” for A&F and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis of (i) Consolidated EBITDAR for the trailing
four
-consecutive-fiscal-quarter period to (ii) the sum of, without duplication, (x) net interest expense for such period, (y) scheduled payments of long-term debt due within twelve months of the date of determination and (z) the sum of minimum rent and contingent store rent, not be less than
1.75
to 1.00 at the end of each testing period. The Company was in compliance with the applicable ratio requirements and other covenants at
February 2, 2013
.
70
The terms of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement include customary events of default such as payment defaults, cross-defaults to other material indebtedness, undischarged material judgments, bankruptcy and insolvency, the occurrence of a defined change in control, or the failure to observe the negative covenants and other covenants related to the operation and conduct of the business of A&F and its subsidiaries. Upon an event of default, the lenders will not be obligated to make loans or other extensions of credit and may, among other things, terminate their commitments to the Company, and declare any then outstanding loans due and payable immediately.
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement will mature on July 27, 2016. The Company had no trade letters of credit outstanding at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012. Stand-by letters of credit outstanding, under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, on
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
were immaterial.
As of
February 2, 2013
and January 28, 2012, the Company did not have any borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
On February 24, 2012, the Company entered into a
$300 million
Term Loan Agreement to increase its flexibility and available liquidity. On January 23, 2013, the Company entered into Amendment No.1 to the Term Loan Agreement (the "Term Loan Agreement") lowering its availability to
$150 million
. In conjunction with the Term Loan Agreement Amendment, the Company amended the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (via Amendment No. 2 thereto) on January 23, 2013, principally to lower the required Coverage Ratio to
1.75
to 1.00. Proceeds from the Term Loan Agreement may be used for any general corporate purpose. The Term Loan will mature on February 23, 2017, with quarterly amortization payments of principal beginning in May 2013. Interest on borrowings may be determined under several alternative methods including LIBOR plus a margin based upon the Company’s Leverage Ratio, which represents the ratio of (a) the sum of total debt (excluding specified permitted foreign bank guarantees) plus
600%
of forward minimum rent commitments to (b) Consolidated EBITDAR (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) for the trailing
four
-consecutive-fiscal-quarter period. Covenants are generally consistent with those in the Company’s Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
As of February 2, 2013, the Company did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan Agreement.
Total interest expense on borrowings was
$3.8 million
,
$2.5 million
and
$4.5 million
for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively.
17. LEASEHOLD FINANCING OBLIGATIONS
As of
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
, the Company had
$63.9 million
and
$57.9 million
, respectively, of long-term liabilities related to leasehold financing obligations. In certain lease arrangements, the Company is involved with the construction of the building. If the Company determines that the Company has substantially all of the risks of ownership during construction of the leased property and therefore is deemed to be the owner of the construction project, the Company records an asset for the amount of the total project costs and an amount related to the value attributed to the pre-existing leased building in Property and Equipment, Net and the related financing obligation in Leasehold Financing Obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Once construction is complete, the Company determines if the asset qualifies for sale-leaseback accounting treatment. If the arrangement does not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment, the Company continues to amortize the obligation over the lease term and depreciates the asset over its useful life. The Company does not report rent expense for the portion of the rent payment determined to be related to the assets which are determined to be owned for accounting purposes. Rather, this portion of the rent payment under the lease is recognized as a reduction of the financing obligation and interest expense.
Total interest expense related to landlord financing obligations was
$6.8 million
,
$5.3 million
and
$3.3 million
for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively.
|
18.
|
DERIVATIVES
|
The Company is exposed to risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates and uses derivatives, primarily forward contracts, to manage the financial impacts of these exposures. The Company does not use forward contracts to engage in currency speculation and does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
In order to qualify for hedge accounting treatment, a derivative must be considered highly effective at offsetting changes in either the hedged item’s cash flows or fair value. Additionally, the hedge relationship must be documented to include the risk management objective and strategy, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the risk exposure, and how hedge effectiveness will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively. The extent to which a hedging instrument has been, and is expected to continue to be, effective at achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows is assessed and documented at least
71
quarterly. Any hedge ineffectiveness is reported in current period earnings and hedge accounting is discontinued if it is determined that the derivative is not highly effective.
For derivatives that either do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as hedges, all changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized in earnings. For qualifying cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) and recognized in earnings when the hedged cash flows affect earnings. The ineffective portion of the derivative gain or loss, as well as changes in the fair value of the derivative’s time value are recognized in current period earnings. The effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on changes in the fair value attributable to changes in spot prices. The changes in the fair value of the derivative contract related to the changes in the difference between the spot price and the forward price are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are also recognized in current period earnings. If the cash flow hedge relationship is terminated, the derivative gains or losses that are deferred in OCI will be recognized in earnings when the hedged cash flows occur. However, for cash flow hedges that are terminated because the forecasted transaction is not expected to occur in the original specified time period, or a
two
-month period thereafter, the derivative gains or losses are immediately recognized in earnings.
The Company uses derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges, to hedge the foreign currency exposure associated with forecasted foreign-currency-denominated intercompany inventory sales to foreign subsidiaries and the related settlement of the foreign-currency-denominated inter-company accounts receivable. Fluctuations in exchange rates will either increase or decrease the Company’s U.S. dollar equivalent cash flows and affect the Company’s U.S. dollar earnings. Gains or losses on the foreign exchange forward contracts that are used to hedge these exposures are expected to partially offset this variability. Foreign exchange forward contracts represent agreements to exchange the currency of one country for the currency of another country at an agreed-upon settlement date. As of
February 2, 2013
, the maximum length of time over which forecasted foreign-currency-denominated inter-company inventory sales were hedged was
ten months
. The sale of the inventory to the Company’s customers will result in the reclassification of related derivative gains and losses that are reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Substantially all of the remaining unrealized gains or losses related to foreign-currency-denominated inter-company inventory sales that have occurred as of
February 2, 2013
will be recognized in costs of goods sold over the following
two months
at the values at the date the inventory was sold to the respective subsidiary.
The Company nets derivative assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the extent that master netting arrangements meet the specific accounting requirements set forth by U.S. GAAP.
As of
February 2, 2013
, the Company had the following outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts that were entered to hedge either a portion, or all, of forecasted foreign-currency-denominated inter-company inventory sales, the resulting settlement of the foreign-currency-denominated inter-company accounts receivable, or both:
|
|
Notional Amount
(1)
|
||
|
Euro
|
$
|
151,138
|
|
|
British Pound
|
$
|
98,600
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar
|
$
|
8,816
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts are reported in thousands and in U.S. Dollars equivalent as of
February 2, 2013
.
|
The Company also uses foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency denominated net monetary assets/liabilities. Examples of monetary assets/liabilities include cash balances, receivables and payables. Fluctuations in exchange rates result in transaction gains/(losses) being recorded in earnings as U.S. GAAP requires that monetary assets/liabilities be remeasured at the spot exchange rate at quarter-end or upon settlement. The Company has chosen not to apply hedge accounting to these instruments because there are no differences in the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument and the hedged item.
72
As of
February 2, 2013
, the Company had the following outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts that were entered into to hedge foreign currency denominated net monetary assets/liabilities:
|
|
Notional Amount
(1)
|
||
|
Euro
|
$
|
23,195
|
|
|
Swiss Franc
|
$
|
10,935
|
|
|
British Pound
|
$
|
8,079
|
|
|
Japanese Yen
|
$
|
4,080
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar
|
$
|
2,031
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts are reported in thousands and in U.S. Dollars equivalent as of
February 2, 2013
.
|
The location and amounts of derivative fair values on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
February 2, 2013
and
January 28, 2012
were as follows:
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Balance Sheet
Location
|
February 2, 2013
|
January 28, 2012
|
Balance
Sheet
Location
|
February 2, 2013
|
January 28, 2012
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
|
Other Current Assets
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
$
|
10,766
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
$
|
9,270
|
|
$
|
874
|
|
|||||
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
|
Other Current Assets
|
$
|
526
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
$
|
717
|
|
$
|
584
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
Other Current Assets
|
$
|
2,493
|
|
$
|
10,770
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
$
|
9,987
|
|
$
|
1,458
|
|
|||||
Refer to Note 8, “
FAIR VALUE,
” for further discussion of the determination of the fair value of derivatives.
The location and amounts of derivative gains and losses for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income were as follows:
|
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
Fiscal 2011
|
||||||
|
|
|
February 2, 2013
|
January 28, 2012
|
||||||
|
|
Location
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments:
|
|||||||||
|
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
|
Other Operating
Income (Expense), Net |
$
|
1,946
|
|
$
|
1,503
|
|
||
73
|
|
Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in OCI on
Derivative
Contracts
(Effective
Portion)
(a)
|
Location of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into Earnings
(Effective Portion)
|
Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated
OCI into
Earnings
(Effective
Portion)
(b)
|
Location of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in
Earnings on
Derivative
Contracts
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
|
Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Earnings
on Derivative
Contracts
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded
from
Effectiveness
Testing)
(c)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
February 2,
2013 |
January 28,
2012 |
|
February 2,
2013 |
January 28,
2012 |
|
February 2,
2013 |
January 28,
2012 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
|
$
|
(4,003
|
)
|
$
|
14,415
|
|
Cost of
Goods Sold |
$
|
17,510
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
Other
Operating Expense (Income), Net |
$
|
226
|
|
$
|
(1,190
|
)
|
|||||||
|
(a)
|
The amount represents the change in fair value of derivative contracts due to changes in spot rates.
|
|
(b)
|
The amount represents reclassification from OCI into earnings that occurs when the hedged item affects earnings, which is when merchandise is sold to the Company’s customers.
|
|
(c)
|
The amount represents the change in fair value of derivative contracts due to changes in the difference between the spot price and forward price that is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and, therefore, recognized in earnings.
|
|
19.
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
On June 16, 2009, A&F’s Board of Directors approved the closure of the Company’s
29
RUEHL branded stores and related direct-to-consumer operations. The Company completed the closure of the RUEHL branded stores and related direct-to-consumer operations during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2009.
Accordingly, the results of operations of RUEHL are reflected in Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2010.
|
20.
|
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
The Company maintains the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Savings & Retirement Plan, a qualified plan. All U.S. associates are eligible to participate in this plan if they are at least
21
years of age and have completed a year of employment with
1,000
or more hours of service. In addition, the Company maintains the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement, composed of two sub-plans (Plan I and Plan II). Plan I contains contributions made through December 31, 2004, while Plan II contains contributions made on and after January 1, 2005. Participation in these plans is based on service and compensation. The Company’s contributions are based on a percentage of associates’ eligible annual compensation. The cost of the Company’s contributions to these plans was
$21.1 million
in Fiscal
2012
,
$16.4 million
in Fiscal
2011
and
$19.4 million
in Fiscal
2010
.
Effective February 2, 2003, the Company established a Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) to provide additional retirement income to its CEO. Subject to service requirements, the CEO will receive a monthly benefit equal to
50%
of his final average compensation (as defined in the SERP) for life. The final average compensation used for the calculation is based on actual compensation, base salary and cash incentive compensation, averaged over the last
36
consecutive full calendar months ending before the CEO’s retirement. The Company recorded net expense of
$3.9 million
,
$1.3 million
and
$2.7 million
for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal
2010
, respectively, associated with the SERP.
The expense for Fiscal 2010, included an expense of
$2.1 million
to correct a cumulative under accrual of the SERP relating to prior periods, primarily Fiscal 2008. The Company does not believe this correction was material to the periods affected.
74
|
21.
|
CONTINGENCIES
|
A&F is a defendant in lawsuits and other adversary proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Legal costs incurred in connection with the resolution of claims and lawsuits are generally expensed as incurred, and the Company establishes reserves for the outcome of litigation where it deems appropriate to do so under applicable accounting rules. The Company’s assessment of the current exposure could change in the event of the discovery of additional facts with respect to legal matters pending against the Company or determinations by judges, juries, administrative agencies or other finders of fact that are not in accordance with the Company’s evaluation of claims. Actual liabilities may exceed the amounts reserved, and there can be no assurance that final resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company has established accruals for certain matters where losses are deemed probable and reasonably estimable. There are other claims and legal proceedings pending against the Company for which accruals have not been established.
|
22.
|
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
In May 2011, Accounting Standards Codification 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” (“ASC 820-10”) was amended to clarify certain disclosure requirements and improve consistency with international reporting standards. This amendment is to be applied prospectively and became effective for the Company beginning January 29, 2012. The adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” was amended in June 2011 to require entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendment does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income under current GAAP. This guidance became effective for the Company’s fiscal year and interim periods beginning January 29, 2012. The adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, which further amends Accounting Standards Codification Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income." The ASU contains new requirements related to the presentation and disclosure of items that are reclassified out of other comprehensive income. The new requirements will give financial statement users a more comprehensive view of items that are reclassified out of other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 is effective for the Company's fiscal year and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012, and is to be applied prospectively. Since the guidance relates only to presentation and disclosure of information, adoption is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
|
23.
|
PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS
|
On July 16, 1998, A&F’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of
one
Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock Purchase Right (the “Rights”) for each outstanding share of Class A Common Stock, par value
$0.01
per share (the "Common Stock"), of A&F. The dividend was paid on July 28, 1998 to stockholders of record on that date. Shares of Common Stock issued after July 28, 1998 and prior to May 25, 1999 were issued with
one
Right attached. A&F’s Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split (the “Stock Split”) on the Common Stock, payable on June 15, 1999 to the holders of record at the close of business on May 25, 1999. In connection with the Stock Split, the number of Rights associated with each share of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on May 25, 1999, or issued or delivered after May 25, 1999 and prior to the “Distribution Date” (as defined below), was proportionately adjusted from
one
Right to
0.50
Right. Each share of Common Stock issued after May 25, 1999 and prior to the Distribution Date has been, and will be issued, with
0.50
Right attached so that all shares of Common Stock outstanding prior to the Distribution Date will have
0.50
Right attached.
The Rights are initially attached to the shares of Common Stock. The Rights will separate from the Common Stock after a Distribution Date occurs. The “Distribution Date” generally means the earlier of (i) the close of business on the 10th day after the date (the “Share Acquisition Date”) of the first public announcement that a person or group (other than A&F or any of A&F’s subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan of A&F or of any of A&F’s subsidiaries) has acquired beneficial ownership of
20%
or more of A&F’s outstanding shares of Common Stock (an “Acquiring Person”), or (ii) the close of business on the 10th business day (or such later date as A&F’s Board of Directors may designate before any person has become an Acquiring Person) after the date of the commencement of a tender or exchange offer by any person which would, if consummated, result in such person becoming an Acquiring Person. The Rights are not exercisable until the Distribution Date. After the Distribution
75
Date, each whole Right may be exercised to purchase, at an initial exercise price of
$250
, one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock.
At any time after any person becomes an Acquiring Person, but before the occurrence of any of the events described in the immediately following paragraph, each holder of a Right, other than the Acquiring Person and certain affiliated persons, will be entitled to purchase, upon exercise of the Right, shares of Common Stock having a market value of twice the exercise price of the Right. At any time after any person becomes an Acquiring Person, but before any person becomes the beneficial owner of
50%
or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock or the occurrence of any of the events described in the immediately following paragraph, A&F’s Board of Directors may exchange all or part of the Rights, other than Rights beneficially owned by an Acquiring Person and certain affiliated persons, for shares of Common Stock at an exchange ratio of one share of Common Stock per
0.50
Right.
If, after any person has become an Acquiring Person, (i) A&F is involved in a merger or other business combination transaction in which A&F is not the surviving corporation or A&F’s Common Stock is exchanged for other securities or assets, or (ii) A&F and/or one or more of A&F’s subsidiaries sell or otherwise transfer
50%
or more of the assets or earning power of A&F and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, each holder of a Right, other than the Acquiring Person and certain affiliated persons, will be entitled to buy, for the exercise price of the Rights, the number of shares of common stock of the other party to the business combination or sale, or in certain circumstances, an affiliate, which at the time of such transaction will have a market value of twice the exercise price of the Right.
The Rights will expire on July 16, 2018, unless earlier exchanged or redeemed. A&F may redeem all of the Rights at a price of
$0.01
per whole Right at any time before any person becomes an Acquiring Person.
Rights holders have no rights as a stockholder of A&F, including no right to vote or to receive dividends.
|
24.
|
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
Summarized unaudited quarterly financial results for Fiscal
2012
and Fiscal
2011
follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
Fiscal Quarter 2012
(1)
|
First
(2)
|
Second
(3)
|
Third
(4)
|
Fourth
(5)
|
|||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
921,218
|
|
$
|
951,407
|
|
$
|
1,169,649
|
|
$
|
1,468,531
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
541,092
|
|
$
|
592,451
|
|
$
|
752,514
|
|
$
|
930,652
|
|
|||
|
Net income (loss)
(10)
|
$
|
(21,305
|
)
|
$
|
17,051
|
|
$
|
84,036
|
|
$
|
157,229
|
|
|||
|
Net income (loss) per diluted share
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|||
|
Fiscal Quarter 2011
(1)
|
First
(6)
|
Second
(7)
|
Third
(8)
|
Fourth
(9)
|
|||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
836,674
|
|
$
|
916,763
|
|
$
|
1,075,856
|
|
$
|
1,328,766
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
525,536
|
|
$
|
578,465
|
|
$
|
656,254
|
|
$
|
789,970
|
|
|||
|
Net income
|
$
|
12,998
|
|
$
|
28,119
|
|
$
|
56,992
|
|
$
|
45,825
|
|
|||
|
Net income per diluted share
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|||
76
|
(1)
|
Results reported above have been restated to reflect the change in method of accounting for inventory effective in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012. Refer to Note 4, “
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE,
” for further discussion.
|
|
(2)
|
For the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, the change in accounting principle decreased gross profit by
$35.3 million
, decreased net income by
$24.3 million
and decreased net income per diluted share by
$0.28
.
|
|
(3)
|
For the second quarter of Fiscal 2012, the change in accounting principle decreased gross profit by
$2.0 million
, increased net income by
$1.5 million
and increased net income per diluted share by
$0.01
.
|
|
(4)
|
For the third quarter of Fiscal 2012, the change in accounting principle increased gross profit by
$20.9 million
, increased net income by
$12.5 million
and increased net income per diluted share by
$0.15
.
|
|
(5)
|
The fourth quarter of Fiscal
2012
includes impairment charges of
$0.06
per diluted share.
|
|
(6)
|
For the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, the change in accounting principle decreased gross profit by
$18.1 million
, decreased net income by
$12.1 million
and decreased net income per diluted share by
$0.14
.
|
|
(7)
|
For the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, the change in accounting principle decreased gross profit by
$4.6 million
, decreased net income by
$3.9 million
and decreased net income per diluted share by
$0.04
.
|
|
(8)
|
For the third quarter of Fiscal 2011, the change in accounting principle increased gross profit by
$9.7 million
, increased net income by
$6.1 million
and increased net income per diluted share by
$0.07
.
|
|
(9)
|
For the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2011, the change in accounting principle increased gross profit by
$44.3 million
, increased net income by
$26.2 million
and increased net income per diluted share by
$0.30
. Additionally, the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2011 includes impairment charges of
$0.50
per diluted share, asset write down charges of
$0.10
per diluted share, store closure and lease exit charges of
$0.13
per diluted share, legal charges of
$0.07
per diluted share, and charges related to a change in intent with regarding the Company’s ARS portfolio of
$0.10
per diluted share.
|
|
(10)
|
Tax expense for the fourteen weeks ended February 2, 2013 included
$1.1 million
to correct for understated tax expense relating to the fourth quarter of 2011. Additionally, the fourth quarter included certain other corrections related to the first three quarters of 2012 that have an immaterial effect on the fourth quarter. The Company does not believe these corrections were material to any current or prior interim or annual periods that were affected.
|
|
25.
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
|
On February 21, 2013, the Company drew down the full
$150
million available under the Term Loan Agreement at an effective interest rate of
1.96%
.
77
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and its subsidiaries (the Company) at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 2, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2013, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audit. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for inventory in fiscal 2012.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Columbus, Ohio
April 2, 2013
78
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
|
None.
79
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
A&F maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that A&F files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to A&F’s management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of A&F and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of A&F, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
A&F’s management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of A&F and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of A&F, evaluated the effectiveness of A&F’s design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal year ended
February 2, 2013
. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of A&F and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of A&F concluded that A&F’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable level of assurance as of
February 2, 2013
, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of A&F is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. A&F’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.
With the participation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of A&F and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of A&F, management evaluated the effectiveness of A&F’s internal control over financial reporting as of
February 2, 2013
using criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on the assessment of A&F’s internal control over financial reporting, under the criteria described in the preceding sentence, management has concluded that, as of
February 2, 2013
, A&F’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
A&F’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of A&F’s internal control over financial reporting as of
February 2, 2013
as stated in their report, which is included in “ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in A&F’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter ended
February 2, 2013
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, A&F’s internal control over financial reporting except for the change in accounting principle to the weighted average cost method from the retail method of accounting for inventory.
80
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION.
|
None.
81
PART III
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
|
Information concerning directors, executive officers and persons nominated or chosen to become directors or executive officers is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the caption “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013 and from the text under the caption “SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT” in PART I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Information concerning beneficial ownership reporting compliance under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Information concerning the Abercrombie & Fitch Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the caption “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013.
Audit Committee
Information concerning A&F’s Audit Committee, including the determination that the Audit Committee has at least one audit committee financial expert (as defined under applicable SEC rules) serving on the Audit Committee, is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the caption “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Committees of the Board — Audit Committee” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013.
Procedures by which Stockholders May Recommend Nominees to A&F’s Board of Directors
Information concerning the procedures by which stockholders of A&F may recommend nominees to A&F’s Board of Directors is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the captions “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Director Qualifications and Consideration of Director Candidates” and “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Director Nominations” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013. These procedures have not materially changed from those described in A&F's definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 14, 2012.
82
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Information regarding executive compensation is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the captions “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Compensation of Directors,” “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Board Role in Risk Oversight,” “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS,” “REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” and “EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013.
83
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|
Information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013.
Information regarding the number of securities to be issued and remaining available under equity compensation plans as of
February 2, 2013
is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the caption “EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013.
84
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
|
Information concerning certain relationships and transactions involving the Company and certain related persons within the meaning of Item 404(a) of SEC Regulation S-K as well as information concerning A&F’s policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the captions “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Compensation of Directors” and “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013.
Information concerning the independence of the directors of A&F is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under the caption “PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — Director Independence” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013.
85
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Information concerning the pre-approval policies and procedures of A&F’s Audit Committee and the fees for services rendered by the Company’s principal independent registered public accounting firm is incorporated by reference from the text to be included under captions “AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS — Pre-Approval Policy” and “AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS — Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in A&F’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013.
86
PART IV
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
(2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules:
All financial statement schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are omitted because the required information is either presented in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto, or is not applicable, required or material.
(3) Exhibits:
The documents listed below are filed or furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K as exhibits or incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference as noted:
87
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of A&F as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on August 27, 1996, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 2, 1996 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock of A&F as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on July 21, 1998, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to A&F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Decrease of Shares Designated as Class B Common Stock as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on July 30, 1999, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 1999 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Abercrombie & Fitch Co., as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on June 16, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed June 17, 2011 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
3.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reflecting amendments through June 16, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 30, 2011 (File No. 001-12107). [
This document represents the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. in compiled form incorporating all amendments. This compiled document has not been filed with the Delaware Secretary of State
.]
|
|
3.6
|
|
Certificate regarding Approval of Amendment to Section 2.03 of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. by Stockholders of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. at Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 10, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed June 16, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
3.7
|
|
Certificate regarding Approval of Addition of New Article IX of Amended and Restated Bylaws by Board of Directors of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. on June 10, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed June 16, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
3.8
|
|
Certificate regarding Approval of Amendments to Sections 1.09 and 2.04 of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. by Board of Directors of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. on November 15, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed November 21, 2011 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
3.9
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reflecting amendments through November 15, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2011 (File No. 001-12107). [
This document represents the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. in compiled form incorporating all amendments
.]
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of July 16, 1998, between A&F and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to A&F’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated and filed July 21, 1998 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of April 21, 1999, between A&F and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to A&F’s Form 8-A (Amendment No. 1), dated April 23, 1999 and filed April 26, 1999 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.3
|
|
Certificate of adjustment of number of Rights associated with each share of Class A Common Stock, dated May 27, 1999, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 1999 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.4
|
|
Appointment and Acceptance of Successor Rights Agent, effective as of the opening of business on October 8, 2001, between A&F and National City Bank, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2001 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.5
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of June 11, 2008, to the Rights Agreement, dated as of July 16, 1998, between A&F and National City Bank (as successor to First Chicago Trust Company of New York), as Rights Agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to A&F’s Form 8-A/A (Amendment No. 2), dated and filed June 12, 2008 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.6
|
|
Appointment and Acceptance of Successor Rights Agent, effective as of the opening of business on November 2, 2009, between A&F and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (as successor to National City Bank), as Rights Agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to A&F’s Form 8-A/A (Amendment No. 5), dated and filed November 3, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
88
|
4.7
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, entered into as of July 28, 2011, among Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co.; the Foreign Subsidiary Borrowers (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement); Abercrombie & Fitch Co.; the Lenders (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement); PNC Bank, National Association, as global agent, the Swing Line Lender and an LC Issuer; PNC Capital Markets LLC, as a co-lead arranger and a co-bookrunner; J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, as a co-lead arranger and a co-bookrunner; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent and an LC Issuer; Fifth Third Bank, as a co-documentation agent; and The Huntington National Bank, as a co-documentation agent and an LC Issuer, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed August 3, 2011 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Guaranty of Payment (Domestic Credit Parties), dated as of July 28, 2011, among Abercrombie & Fitch Co.; the material Domestic Subsidiaries (as defined in the Amended and Restated Guaranty of Payment (Domestic Credit Parties)); and PNC Bank, National Association, as global agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed August 3, 2011 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.9
|
|
Supplement No. 1 to Amended and Restated Guaranty of Payment (Domestic Credit Parties), dated as of August 31, 2011, between NSOP, LLC, as a New Guarantor, and PNC Bank, National Association, as global agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 30, 2011 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.10
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, made as of February 24, 2012, among Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co. and the Foreign Subsidiary Borrowers (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2011), as borrowers; Abercrombie & Fitch Co., as a guarantor; PNC Bank, National Association, as Global Agent, Swing Line Lender, an LC Issuer and a Lender; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as an LC Issuer and a Lender; Fifth Third Bank, as a Lender; The Huntington National Bank, as an LC Issuer and a Lender; PNC Bank, National Association, Canada Branch, as a Canadian Lender; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as a Canadian Lender; Bank of America, N.A., as a Lender; U.S. Bank National Association, as a Lender; Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, as a Lender; and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as a Lender, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 29, 2012 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.11
|
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, made as of January 23, 2012, among Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co., as borrower; Abercrombie & Fitch Co., as guarantor; Abercrombie & Fitch Europe S.A., Abercrombie & Fitch (UK) Limited, AFH Stores UK Limited, AFH Canada Stores Co. and AFH Japan, G.K., as foreign subsidiary borrowers; PNC Bank, National Association, as Global Agent, the Swing Line Lender, an LC Issuer and a Lender; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as a Lender; Fifth Third Bank, as a Lender; The Huntington National Bank, as a Lender; PNC Bank Canadian Branch, as a Canadian Lender; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as a Canadian Lender; Bank of America N.A., as a Lender; U.S. Bank National Association, as a Lender; and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as a Lender, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to A&F's Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed January 25, 2013 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Term Loan Agreement, entered into as of February 24, 2012, among Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co.; Abercrombie & Fitch Co.; the Lenders (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement); PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and a Lender; PNC Capital Markets LLC, as a co-lead arranger and a co-bookrunner; J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as a co-lead arranger and a co-bookrunner; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent and a Lender; Fifth Third Bank, as a co-documentation agent and a Lender; Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, as a co-documentation agent and a Lender; The Huntington National Bank, as a Lender; U.S. Bank National Association, as a Lender; HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as a Lender; and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as a Lender, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 29, 2012 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.13
|
|
Guaranty of Payment (Credit Parties), dated as of February 24, 2012, among Abercrombie & Fitch Co.; the material Domestic Subsidiaries (as identified in the Guaranty of Payment (Credit Parties)); and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 29, 2012 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
4.14
|
Amendment No. 1 to Term Loan Agreement, made as of January 23, 2013, among Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co., as borrower; Abercrombie & Fitch Co., as a guarantor; PNC Bank, National Association, as Agent and a Lender; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as a Lender; Fifth Third Bank, as a Lender; The Huntington National Bank, as a Lender; HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as a Lender; U.S. Bank National Association, as a Lender; Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, as a Lender; and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as a Lender, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to A&F's Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed January 25, 2013 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
|
*10.1
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Incentive Compensation Performance Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed June 18, 2012 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.2
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2002 Stock Plan for Associates (as amended and restated May 22, 2003), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2003 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, entered into as of August 15, 2005, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, including as Exhibit A thereto the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Michael S. Jeffries) effective February 2, 2003, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed August 26, 2005 (File No. 001-12107).
|
89
|
*10.4
|
|
Employment Agreement, entered into as of December 19, 2008, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed December 22, 2008 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.5
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Michael S. Jeffries Employment Agreement, entered into on April 12, 2010, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed April 13, 2010 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.6
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Michael S. Jeffries Employment Agreement, made and entered into on January 28, 2011, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed January 31, 2011 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.7
|
Amendment No. 3 to Michael S. Jeffries Employment Agreement, made and entered into on May 7, 2012, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F's Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed May 9, 2012 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement, made and entered into to be effective as of June 1, 2010, by and between Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co., as Lessor, and Michael S. Jeffries, as Lessee, and consented to by DFZ, LLC, as Owner (the “Gulfstream Agreement”), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 1, 2010 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
10.9
|
|
Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement, made and entered into to be effective as of November 12, 2010, by and between Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co., as Lessor, and Michael S. Jeffries, as Lessee, and consented to by NetJets Sales, Inc., NetJets Aviation, Inc. and NetJets Services, Inc. (the “NetJets Agreement”), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to A&F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
10.10
|
|
Letter of Understanding, dated November 12, 2010, between Michael S. Jeffries and Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co. in respect of the Gulfstream Agreement and the NetJets Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to A&F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.11
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated May 22, 2003) — as authorized by the Board of Directors of A&F on December 17, 2007, to become one of two plans following the division of said Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated May 22, 2003) into two separate plans effective January 1, 2005 and to be named the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (Plan I) [terms to govern “amounts deferred” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2005 and any earnings thereon], incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2003 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.12
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan (January 1, 2001 Restatement) — as authorized by the Compensation Committee of the A&F Board of Directors on August 14, 2008, to become one of two sub-plans following the division of said Abercrombie & Fitch Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan (January 1, 2001 Restatement) into two sub-plans effective immediately before January 1, 2009 and to be named the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan I [terms to govern amounts “deferred” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) before January 1, 2005, and any earnings thereon], incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to A&F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.13
|
|
First Amendment to the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan I (Plan I) (January 1, 2001 Restatement), as authorized by the Compensation Committee of the A&F Board of Directors on August 14, 2008 and executed on behalf of A&F on September 3, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 2, 2008 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.14
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan (II) — as authorized by the Compensation Committee of the A&F Board of Directors on August 14, 2008, to become one of two sub-plans following the division of the Abercrombie & Fitch Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan (January 1, 2001 Restatement) into two sub-plans effective immediately before January 1, 2009 and to be named the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan II [terms to govern amounts “deferred” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005, and any earnings thereon], incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 2, 2008 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.15
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2003 Stock Plan for Non-Associate Directors, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2003 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.16
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Nonstatutory Stock Options) used for grants under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2002 Stock Plan for Associates prior to November 28, 2004, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.17
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Nonstatutory Stock Options) used for grants under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2002 Stock Plan for Associates after November 28, 2004 and before March 6, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 (File No. 001-12107).
|
90
|
*10.18
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement used for grants under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2003 Stock Plan for Non-Associate Directors prior to November 28, 2004, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.19
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement used for grants under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2003 Stock Plan for Non-Associate Directors after November 28, 2004 and before June 13, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to A&F’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.20
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Nonstatutory Stock Options) used for grants under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2002 Stock Plan for Associates on or after March 6, 2006 and before June 13, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to A&F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.21
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed June 17, 2005 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.22
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Nonstatutory Stock Option) used for grants under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan prior to March 6, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed August 19, 2005 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.23
|
|
Summary of Terms of the Annual Restricted Stock Unit Grants to Non-Associate Directors of Abercrombie & Fitch Co., to summarize the terms of the grants to the Board of Directors of A&F under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
*10.24
|
|
Summary of Compensation Structure for Non-Associate Members of Board of Directors of A&F.
|
|
*10.25
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Nonstatutory Stock Option) for Associates used for grants under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan on or after March 6, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to A&F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.26
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Associates used for grants under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan on or after March 6, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to A&F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.27
|
|
Trust Agreement, made as of October 16, 2006, between A&F and Wilmington Trust Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed October 17, 2006 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.28
|
|
Amended and Restated Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed June 17, 2011 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.29
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement to be used to evidence the grant of non-statutory stock options to associates of A&F and its subsidiaries under the Amended and Restated Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (formerly known as the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan) after August 21, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed August 27, 2007 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.30
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement to be used to evidence the grant of restricted stock units to associates of A&F and its subsidiaries under the Amended and Restated Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (formerly known as the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan) after August 21, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed August 27, 2007 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.31
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement to be used to evidence the grant of restricted stock units to Executive Vice Presidents of A&F and its subsidiaries under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan on and after March 4, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed March 6, 2008 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.32
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Associate Stock Purchase Plan (Effective July 1, 1998), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Schedule 13D filed by Michael S. Jeffries on May 2, 2006.
|
|
*10.33
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement to be used to evidence the grant of stock appreciation rights to associates (employees) of A&F and its subsidiaries under the Amended and Restated Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (formerly known as the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan) on and after February 12, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 17, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.34
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement to be used to evidence the Semi-Annual Grants of stock appreciation rights to Michael S. Jeffries under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (now known as the Amended and Restated Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan) as contemplated by the Employment Agreement, entered into as of December 19, 2008, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 17, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
91
|
*10.35
|
|
Stock Appreciation Right Agreement [Retention Grant Tranche 1], made to be effective as of December 19, 2008, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries entered into to evidence first tranche of Retention Grant covering 1,600,000 stock appreciation rights granted under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (now known as the Amended and Restated Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan) as contemplated by the Employment Agreement, entered into as of December 19, 2008, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 17, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.36
|
|
Stock Appreciation Right Agreement [Retention Grant Tranche 2] by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries entered into effective as of March 2, 2009 to evidence second tranche of Retention Grant covering 1,200,000 stock appreciation rights granted under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (now known as the Amended and Restated Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan) as contemplated by the Employment Agreement, entered into as of December 19, 2008, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 17, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.37
|
|
Stock Appreciation Right Agreement [Retention Grant Tranche 3] by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries entered into effective as of September 1, 2009 to evidence third tranche of Retention Grant covering 1,200,000 stock appreciation rights granted under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (now known as the Amended and Restated Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan) as contemplated by the Employment Agreement, entered into as of December 19, 2008, by and between A&F and Michael S. Jeffries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 17, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.38
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement to be used to evidence the grant of stock appreciation rights to associates (employees) of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and its subsidiaries under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan after February 12, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 17, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
*10.39
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (Plan II) — as authorized by the Board of Directors of A&F on December 17, 2007, to become one of two plans following the division of the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated May 22, 2003) into two separate plans effective January 1, 2005 and to be named Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (Plan II) [terms to govern “amounts deferred” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005 and any earnings thereon], incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to A&F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of Leverage Ratio and Coverage Ratio for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.
|
|
14.1
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as amended by the Board of Directors of A&F on August 21, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 14 to A&F’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed August 27, 2007 (File No. 001-12107).
|
|
18.1
|
Letter of Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
|
24.1
|
|
Powers of Attorney
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications by Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
|
|
101
|
|
The following materials from Abercrombie & Fitch Co.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011; (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements***
|
|
*
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
**
|
These certifications are furnished.
|
|
***
|
Electronically submitted herewith
|
92
(b) The documents listed in Item 15(a)(3) are filed or furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K as exhibits or incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
(c)
Financial Statement Schedules
None
93
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or l5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
|
|
Date: April 2, 2013
|
|
By
/s/ JONATHAN E. RAMSDEN
|
|
|
Jonathan E. Ramsden,
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on April 2, 2013.
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
/s/ Michael S. Jeffries
Michael S. Jeffries
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
*
James B. Bachmann
|
Director
|
|
|
*
Lauren J. Brisky
|
Director
|
|
|
*
Michael E. Greenlees
|
Director
|
|
|
*
Archie M. Griffin
|
Director
|
|
|
*
Kevin S. Huvane
|
Director
|
|
|
*
John W. Kessler
|
Director
|
|
|
*
Elizabeth M. Lee
|
Director
|
|
|
/s/ Jonathan E. Ramsden
Jonathan E. Ramsden
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
*
Craig R. Stapleton
|
Director
|
|
|
*
|
The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this Annual Report on Form 10-K on behalf of each of the above-named directors of the Registrant pursuant to powers of attorney executed by such directors, which powers of attorney are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K as exhibits, in the capacities as indicated and on April 2, 2013.
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Jonathan E. Ramsden
|
|
|
Jonathan E. Ramsden
|
|
|
|
Attorney-in-fact
|
|
94
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 2, 2013
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
EXHIBITS
95
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Document
|
|
10.23
|
Summary of Terms of the Annual Restricted Stock Unit Grants to Non-Associate Directors of Abercrombie & Fitch Co., to summarize the terms of the grants to the Board of Directors of A&F under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
10.24
|
Summary of Compensation Structure for Non-Associate Members of Board of Directors of A&F.
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of Leverage Ratio and Coverage Ratio for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.
|
|
18.1
|
|
Letter of Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
|
24.1
|
|
Powers of Attorney
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications by Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
101
|
|
The following materials from Abercrombie & Fitch Co.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011; (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
96
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IprintItem 1. BusinessprintItem 1A. Risk FactorsprintItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsprintItem 2. PropertiesprintItem 3. Legal ProceedingsprintItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresprintPart IIprintItem 5 . Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesprintItem 6. Selected Financial DataprintItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsprintItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskprintItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataprintItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureprintItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresprintItem 9B. Other InformationprintPart IIIprintItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceprintItem 11. Executive CompensationprintItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersprintItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceprintItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesprintPart IVprintItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedulesprint