ASB 10-Q Quarterly Report June 30, 2014 | Alphaminr

ASB 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2014

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 d766457d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-31343

Associated Banc-Corp

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Wisconsin 39-1098068

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

433 Main Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(920) 491-7500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ¨ No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

The number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at July 31, 2014, was 154,864,826.


Table of Contents

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

PART I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited):

Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

3

Consolidated Statements of Income — Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income —Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity — Six Months Ended June  30, 2014 and 2013

6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

8

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

51

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

82

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

82

PART II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

82

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

83

Item 6. Exhibits

83

Signatures

84

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements:

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP

Consolidated Balance Sheets

June 30,
2014
(Unaudited)
December 31,
2013
(Audited)
(In Thousands, except share and per share data)

ASSETS

Cash and due from banks

$ 549,883 $ 455,482

Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions

78,233 126,018

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

18,135 20,745

Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost

246,050 175,210

Investment securities available for sale, at fair value

5,506,379 5,250,585

Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stocks, at cost

186,247 181,249

Loans held for sale

78,657 64,738

Loans

17,045,052 15,896,261

Allowance for loan losses

(271,851 ) (268,315 )

Loans, net

16,773,201 15,627,946

Premises and equipment, net

264,735 270,890

Goodwill

929,168 929,168

Other intangible assets, net

70,538 74,464

Trading assets

40,630 43,728

Other assets

985,930 1,006,697

Total assets

$ 25,727,786 $ 24,226,920

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

$ 4,211,057 $ 4,626,312

Interest-bearing deposits

13,105,202 12,640,855

Total deposits

17,316,259 17,267,167

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

959,051 475,442

Other short-term funding

1,378,120 265,484

Long-term funding

2,931,809 3,087,267

Trading liabilities

43,311 46,470

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

169,290 193,800

Total liabilities

22,797,840 21,335,630

Stockholders’ equity

Preferred equity

61,024 61,862

Common stock

1,750 1,750

Surplus

1,628,356 1,617,990

Retained earnings

1,432,518 1,392,508

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

10,494 (24,244 )

Treasury stock, at cost

(204,196 ) (158,576 )

Total stockholders’ equity

2,929,946 2,891,290

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 25,727,786 $ 24,226,920

Preferred shares issued

62,689 63,549

Preferred shares authorized (par value $1.00 per share)

750,000 750,000

Common shares issued

175,012,686 175,012,686

Common shares authorized (par value $0.01 per share)

250,000,000 250,000,000

Treasury shares of common stock

13,464,882 10,874,182

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013 2014 2013
(In Thousands, except per share data)

INTEREST INCOME

Interest and fees on loans

$ 146,629 $ 146,896 $ 290,016 $ 292,423

Interest and dividends on investment securities

Taxable

26,109 21,446 52,366 43,059

Tax exempt

7,030 6,785 14,001 13,750

Other interest

1,862 1,233 3,311 2,480

Total interest income

181,630 176,360 359,694 351,712

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest on deposits

6,195 7,769 12,354 16,310

Interest on Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

306 333 611 743

Interest on other short-term funding

280 525 396 857

Interest on long-term funding

6,146 7,551 12,657 15,967

Total interest expense

12,927 16,178 26,018 33,877

NET INTEREST INCOME

168,703 160,182 333,676 317,835

Provision for credit losses

5,000 5,300 10,000 8,600

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

163,703 154,882 323,676 309,235

NONINTEREST INCOME

Trust service fees

12,017 11,405 23,728 22,315

Service charges on deposit accounts

17,412 17,443 33,812 34,272

Card-based and other nondeposit fees

12,577 12,591 25,086 24,541

Insurance commissions

13,651 9,631 25,968 21,394

Brokerage and annuity commissions

4,520 3,688 8,553 7,204

Mortgage banking, net

5,362 19,263 11,723 37,028

Capital market fees, net

2,099 5,074 4,421 7,657

Bank owned life insurance income

3,011 3,281 7,331 6,251

Asset gains (losses), net

899 (44 ) 1,627 792

Investment securities gains, net

34 34 412 334

Other

665 1,944 3,107 4,522

Total noninterest income

72,247 84,310 145,768 166,310

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

Personnel expense

97,793 99,791 195,491 197,698

Occupancy

13,785 14,305 29,345 29,967

Equipment

6,227 6,462 12,503 12,629

Technology

14,594 12,651 27,318 24,159

Business development and advertising

5,077 5,028 10,139 9,565

Other intangible asset amortization

991 1,011 1,982 2,022

Loan expense

3,620 3,044 6,407 6,328

Legal and professional fees

4,436 5,483 8,624 10,828

Losses other than loans

381 499 925 883

Foreclosure / OREO expense

1,575 2,302 3,471 4,724

FDIC expense

4,945 4,395 9,946 9,827

Other

14,501 13,725 29,432 27,681

Total noninterest expense

167,925 168,696 335,583 336,311

Income before income taxes

68,025 70,496 133,861 139,234

Income tax expense

21,660 22,608 42,297 43,958

Net income

46,365 47,888 91,564 95,276

Preferred stock dividends

1,278 1,300 2,522 2,600

Net income available to common equity

$ 45,087 $ 46,588 $ 89,042 $ 92,676

Earnings per common share:

Basic

$ 0.28 $ 0.28 $ 0.55 $ 0.55

Diluted

$ 0.28 $ 0.28 $ 0.55 $ 0.55

Average common shares outstanding:

Basic

159,940 166,605 160,699 167,415

Diluted

160,838 166,748 161,513 167,552

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013 2014 2013
($ in Thousands)

Net income

$ 46,365 $ 47,888 $ 91,564 $ 95,276

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Investment securities available for sale:

Net unrealized gains (losses)

35,557 (111,829 ) 56,184 (121,760 )

Reclassification adjustment for net gains realized in net income

(34 ) (34 ) (412 ) (334 )

Income tax (expense) benefit

(13,655 ) 43,188 (21,441 ) 47,138

Other comprehensive income (loss) on investment securities available for sale

21,868 (68,675 ) 34,331 (74,956 )

Defined benefit pension and postretirement obligations:

Amortization of prior service cost

15 17 30 35

Amortization of actuarial losses

316 1,073 632 2,145

Income tax expense

(128 ) (421 ) (255 ) (842 )

Other comprehensive income on pension and postretirement obligations

203 669 407 1,338

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

22,071 (68,006 ) 34,738 (73,618 )

Comprehensive income (loss)

$ 68,436 $ (20,118 ) $ 126,302 $ 21,658

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

Preferred
Equity
Common
Stock
Surplus Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Treasury
Stock
Total
($ in Thousands, except per share data)

Balance, December 31, 2012

$ 63,272 $ 1,750 $ 1,602,136 $ 1,281,811 $ 48,603 $ (61,173 ) $ 2,936,399

Comprehensive income:

Net income

95,276 95,276

Other comprehensive loss

(73,618 ) (73,618 )

Comprehensive income

21,658

Common stock issued:

Stock-based compensation plans, net

387 (16,793 ) 20,401 3,995

Purchase of treasury stock

(63,239 ) (63,239 )

Cash dividends:

Common stock, $0.16 per share

(26,957 ) (26,957 )

Preferred stock

(2,600 ) (2,600 )

Stock-based compensation expense, net

7,571 7,571

Tax benefit of stock options

149 149

Balance, June 30, 2013

$ 63,272 $ 1,750 $ 1,610,243 $ 1,330,737 $ (25,015 ) $ (104,011 ) $ 2,876,976

Balance, December 31, 2013

$ 61,862 $ 1,750 $ 1,617,990 $ 1,392,508 $ (24,244 ) $ (158,576 ) $ 2,891,290

Comprehensive income:

Net income

91,564 91,564

Other comprehensive income

34,738 34,738

Comprehensive income

126,302

Common stock issued:

Stock-based compensation plans, net

1,071 (19,735 ) 27,027 8,363

Purchase of treasury stock

(72,647 ) (72,647 )

Cash dividends:

Common stock, $0.18 per share

(29,175 ) (29,175 )

Preferred stock

(2,522 ) (2,522 )

Purchase of preferred stock

(838 ) (122 ) (960 )

Stock-based compensation expense, net

8,468 8,468

Tax benefit of stock options

827 827

Balance, June 30, 2014

$ 61,024 $ 1,750 $ 1,628,356 $ 1,432,518 $ 10,494 $ (204,196 ) $ 2,929,946

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013
($ in Thousands)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net income

$ 91,564 $ 95,276

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Provision for credit losses

10,000 8,600

Depreciation and amortization

25,834 24,016

Addition to (recovery of) valuation allowance on mortgage servicing rights, net

119 (13,282 )

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights

5,545 9,191

Amortization of other intangible assets

1,982 2,022

Amortization and accretion on earning assets, funding, and other, net

13,788 26,294

Tax impact of stock based compensation

827 149

Gain on sales of investment securities, net

(412 ) (334 )

Gain on sales of assets and impairment write-downs, net

(1,627 ) (792 )

Gain on mortgage banking activities, net

(8,169 ) (14,808 )

Mortgage loans originated and acquired for sale

(479,449 ) (1,463,808 )

Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale

478,688 1,525,083

Pension contributions

(10,000 )

Increase in interest receivable

(1,617 ) (2,581 )

Decrease in interest payable

(880 ) (1,177 )

Net change in other assets and other liabilities

(19,677 ) 9,312

Net cash provided by operating activities

116,516 193,161

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Net increase in loans

(1,166,685 ) (392,504 )

Purchases of:

Available for sale securities

(673,073 ) (911,453 )

Premises, equipment, and software, net of disposals

(19,365 ) (31,548 )

FHLB stock

(4,997 ) (28,399 )

Held to maturity securities

(70,581 ) (36,181 )

Other assets

(461 ) (884 )

Proceeds from:

Sales of available for sale securities

80,362 64,055

Prepayments, calls, and maturities of available for sale securities

373,692 775,952

Prepayments, calls, and maturities of held to maturity securities

5,670

FHLB stock

14,399

Prepayments, calls, and maturities of other assets

17,913 21,100

Sales of loans originated for investment

12,172

Net cash used in investing activities

(1,457,525 ) (513,291 )

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Net increase in deposits

49,092 192,571

Net increase in short-term funding

1,596,245 437,561

Repayment of long-term funding

(155,018 ) (400,110 )

Purchase of preferred stock

(960 )

Cash dividends on common stock

(29,175 ) (26,957 )

Cash dividends on preferred stock

(2,522 ) (2,600 )

Purchase of treasury stock

(72,647 ) (63,239 )

Net cash provided by financing activities

1,385,015 137,226

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

44,006 (182,904 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

602,245 737,873

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 646,251 $ 554,969

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

Cash paid for interest

$ 26,971 $ 34,997

Cash paid for income taxes

38,667 20,419

Loans and bank premises transferred to other real estate owned

12,049 14,716

Capitalized mortgage servicing rights

3,720 11,367

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted or abbreviated. The information contained in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes in Associated Banc-Corp’s 2013 annual report on Form 10-K, should be referred to in connection with the reading of these unaudited interim financial statements.

NOTE 1: Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Associated Banc-Corp (individually referred to herein as the “Parent Company,” and together with all of its subsidiaries and affiliates, collectively referred to herein as the “Corporation”) for the periods presented, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements of prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current period’s presentation. The consolidated statements of income were modified from prior periods’ presentation to conform with the current period presentation, which shows a new provision for credit losses line item comprised of the provision for loan losses and the provision for unfunded commitments. In prior periods’ presentation, the provision for unfunded commitments was reported as a component of losses other than loans in the consolidated statements of income. The presentation of the consolidated balance sheets remains unchanged with the allowance for loan losses presented as a valuation allowance with the related loan asset, while the allowance for unfunded commitments is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the determination of the allowance for credit losses, goodwill impairment assessment, mortgage servicing rights valuation, and income taxes. Management has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition or disclosure.

NOTE 2: New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

In July 2013, the FASB issued an amendment to clarify the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. This amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013 and should be applied prospectively. The Corporation adopted the accounting standard during the first quarter of 2014, as required, with no material impact on its results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.

8


Table of Contents

NOTE 3: Earnings Per Common Share

Earnings per share are calculated utilizing the two-class method. Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common shareholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share are calculated by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common shareholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock awards (outstanding stock options, unvested restricted stock, and outstanding stock warrants). Presented below are the calculations for basic and diluted earnings per common share.

For the Three Months Ended For the Six Months Ended
June 30 June 30
2014 2013 2014 2013
(In Thousands, except per share data)

Net income

$ 46,365 $ 47,888 $ 91,564 $ 95,276

Preferred stock dividends

(1,278 ) (1,300 ) (2,522 ) (2,600 )

Net income available to common equity

$ 45,087 $ 46,588 $ 89,042 $ 92,676

Common shareholder dividends

(14,393 ) (13,305 ) (28,881 ) (26,682 )

Dividends on unvested share-based payment awards

(143 ) (168 ) (294 ) (275 )

Undistributed earnings

$ 30,551 $ 33,115 $ 59,867 $ 65,719

Undistributed earnings allocated to common shareholders

30,247 32,864 59,375 65,239

Undistributed earnings allocated to unvested share-based payment awards

304 251 492 480

Undistributed earnings

$ 30,551 $ 33,115 $ 59,867 $ 65,719

Basic

Distributed earnings to common shareholders

$ 14,393 $ 13,305 $ 28,881 $ 26,682

Undistributed earnings allocated to common shareholders

30,247 32,864 59,375 65,239

Total common shareholders earnings, basic

$ 44,640 $ 46,169 $ 88,256 $ 91,921

Diluted

Distributed earnings to common shareholders

$ 14,393 $ 13,305 $ 28,881 $ 26,682

Undistributed earnings allocated to common shareholders

30,247 32,864 59,375 65,239

Total common shareholders earnings, diluted

$ 44,640 $ 46,169 $ 88,256 $ 91,921

Weighted average common shares outstanding

159,940 166,605 160,699 167,415

Effect of dilutive common stock awards

898 143 814 137

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

160,838 166,748 161,513 167,552

Basic earnings per common share

$ 0.28 $ 0.28 $ 0.55 $ 0.55

Diluted earnings per common share

$ 0.28 $ 0.28 $ 0.55 $ 0.55

Options to purchase approximately 3 million and 2 million shares were outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, but excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. Options to purchase approximately 3 million shares were outstanding for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, but excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

9


Table of Contents

NOTE 4: Stock-Based Compensation

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation had one stock-based compensation plan, the 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan. All stock options granted under this plan have an exercise price that is equal to the closing price of the Corporation’s stock on the grant date.

The Corporation may issue restricted common stock and restricted common stock units to certain key employees (collectively referred to as “restricted stock awards”). The shares of restricted stock are restricted as to transfer, but are not restricted as to dividend payment or voting rights. Restricted stock units receive dividend equivalents but do not have voting rights. The transfer restrictions primarily lapse over three or four years, depending upon whether the awards are service-based or performance-based. Service-based awards are contingent upon continued employment or meeting the requirements for retirement, and performance-based awards are based on earnings per share performance goals, total shareholder return, and continued employment or meeting the requirements for retirement.

The fair value of stock options granted is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, while the fair value of restricted stock awards is their fair market value on the date of grant. The fair values of stock options and restricted stock awards are amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the grants. Compensation expense recognized is included in personnel expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Assumptions are used in estimating the fair value of stock options granted. The weighted average expected life of the stock option represents the period of time that stock options are expected to be outstanding and is estimated using historical data of stock option exercises and forfeitures. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility is based on the implied volatility of the Corporation’s stock. The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value for options granted in the first six months of 2014 and full year 2013.

2014 2013

Dividend yield

2.00 % 2.00 %

Risk-free interest rate

2.00 % 0.99 %

Weighted average expected volatility

20.00 % 34.35 %

Weighted average expected life

6 years 6 years

Weighted average per share fair value of options

$ 3.00 $ 3.80

The Corporation is required to estimate potential forfeitures of stock grants and adjust compensation expense recorded accordingly. The estimate of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized in the period of change and will also impact the amount of stock compensation expense to be recognized in future periods. The plan provides that restricted common stock and stock options will immediately become fully vested upon retirement from the Corporation of those colleagues whose retirements meet the early retirement or normal retirement definitions under the plan (“retirement eligible colleagues”).

10


Table of Contents

A summary of the Corporation’s stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the six months ended June 30, 2014, is presented below.

Weighted Average Aggregate Intrinsic
Weighted Average Remaining Value

Stock Options

Shares Exercise Price Contractual Term (000s)

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

8,640,558 $ 18.88

Granted

1,020,979 14.02

Exercised

(642,202 ) 13.43

Forfeited or expired

(985,092 ) 21.49

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

8,034,243 $ 18.37 6.03 $ 20,838

Options exercisable at December 31, 2013

4,923,720 $ 21.48 4.62 8,580

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

8,034,243 $ 18.37

Granted

1,389,452 17.45

Exercised

(554,339 ) 13.76

Forfeited or expired

(511,411 ) 25.19

Outstanding at June 30, 2014

8,357,945 $ 18.11 6.40 $ 22,723

Options exercisable at June 30, 2014

5,434,125 $ 19.61 5.10 14,646

The following table summarizes information about the Corporation’s nonvested stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2013, and for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Weighted Average

Stock Options

Shares Grant Date Fair Value

Nonvested at December 31, 2012

4,036,595 $ 5.11

Granted

1,020,979 3.80

Vested

(1,680,981 ) 5.10

Forfeited

(266,070 ) 5.05

Nonvested at December 31, 2013

3,110,523 $ 4.69

Granted

1,389,452 3.00

Vested

(1,476,283 ) 4.95

Forfeited

(99,872 ) 4.44

Nonvested at June 30, 2014

2,923,820 $ 3.76

For both the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, the intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $2 million. The total fair value of stock options that vested was $7 million for the first six months of 2014 and $9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Corporation recognized compensation expense for the vesting of stock options of $3 million and $4 million, respectively. For the full year 2013, the Corporation recognized compensation expense of $8 million for the vesting of stock options. Included in compensation expense for 2014 was approximately $250,000 of expense for the accelerated vesting of stock options granted to retirement eligible colleagues. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation had $8 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over the remaining requisite service periods that extend predominantly through fourth quarter 2018.

11


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information about the Corporation’s restricted stock awards activity for the year ended December 31, 2013, and for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Weighted Average

Restricted Stock

Shares Grant Date Fair Value

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

932,425 $ 13.60

Granted

1,276,868 14.03

Vested

(626,480 ) 13.68

Forfeited

(71,048 ) 13.92

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

1,511,765 $ 13.92

Granted

1,135,580 17.41

Vested

(518,017 ) 14.10

Forfeited

(68,333 ) 14.62

Outstanding at June 30, 2014

2,060,995 $ 15.77

The Corporation amortizes the expense related to restricted stock awards as compensation expense over the vesting period specified in the grant. Restricted stock awards granted during 2013 to executive officers will vest ratably over a three year period, while restricted stock awards granted during 2014 will vest ratably over a four year period. Restricted stock awards granted to non-executives during 2014 and 2013 will vest ratably over a four year period. Expense for restricted stock awards of approximately $5 million and $4 million was recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Corporation recognized approximately $7 million of expense for restricted stock awards for the full year 2013. Included in compensation expense for 2014 was approximately $950,000 of expense for the accelerated vesting of restricted stock awards granted to retirement eligible colleagues. The Corporation had $27 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock awards at June 30, 2014 that is expected to be recognized over the remaining requisite service periods that extend predominantly through fourth quarter 2018.

The Corporation issues shares from treasury, when available, or new shares upon the exercise of stock options or the granting of restricted stock awards. The Board of Directors has authorized management to repurchase shares of the Corporation’s common stock each quarter in the market, to be made available for issuance in connection with the Corporation’s employee incentive plans and for other corporate purposes. The repurchase of shares will be based on market and investment opportunities, capital levels, growth prospects, and regulatory constraints. Such repurchases may occur from time to time in open market purchases, block transactions, private transactions, accelerated share repurchase programs, or similar facilities.

12


Table of Contents

NOTE 5: Investment Securities

The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available for sale and held to maturity were as follows.

Gross Gross
Amortized unrealized unrealized

June 30, 2014:

cost gains losses Fair value
($ in Thousands)

Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury securities

$ 1,000 $ $ $ 1,000

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

626,798 27,344 (102 ) 654,040

Residential mortgage-related securities:

Government-sponsored enterprise (“GSE”)

3,852,274 69,798 (40,151 ) 3,881,921

Private-label

2,597 18 (1 ) 2,614

GNMA commercial mortgage-related securities

961,507 2,516 (23,681 ) 940,342

Asset-backed securities (1)

19,396 (1 ) 19,395

Other securities (debt and equity)

7,026 41 7,067

Total investment securities available for sale

$ 5,470,598 $ 99,717 $ (63,936 ) $ 5,506,379

Investment securities held to maturity:

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

$ 246,050 $ 4,645 $ (1,466 ) $ 249,229

Total investment securities held to maturity

$ 246,050 $ 4,645 $ (1,466 ) $ 249,229

(1) The asset-backed securities position is largely comprised of senior, floating rate, tranches of student loan securities issued by SLM Corp and guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan Program.

Gross Gross
Amortized unrealized unrealized

December 31, 2013:

cost gains losses Fair value
($ in Thousands)

Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury securities

$ 1,001 $ 1 $ $ 1,002

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

653,758 23,855 (1,533 ) 676,080

Residential mortgage-related securities:

GSE

3,855,467 61,542 (78,579 ) 3,838,430

Private-label

3,035 16 (37 ) 3,014

GNMA commercial mortgage-related securities

673,555 1,764 (27,842 ) 647,477

Asset-backed securities (1)

23,049 10 23,059

Other securities (debt and equity)

60,711 855 (43 ) 61,523

Total investment securities available for sale

$ 5,270,576 $ 88,043 $ (108,034 ) $ 5,250,585

Investment securities held to maturity:

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

$ 175,210 $ 401 $ (5,722 ) $ 169,889

Total investment securities held to maturity

$ 175,210 $ 401 $ (5,722 ) $ 169,889

13


Table of Contents

The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available for sale and held to maturity at June 30, 2014, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Available for Sale Held to Maturity
($ in Thousands) Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value

Due in one year or less

$ 22,819 $ 23,062 $ 500 $ 501

Due after one year through five years

227,162 238,489 229 230

Due after five years through ten years

375,089 390,394 94,136 94,505

Due after ten years

9,736 10,112 151,185 153,993

Total debt securities

634,806 662,057 246,050 249,229

Residential mortgage-related securities:

GSE

3,852,274 3,881,921

Private-label

2,597 2,614

GNMA commercial mortgage-related securities

961,507 940,342

Asset-backed securities

19,396 19,395

Equity securities

18 50

Total investment securities

$ 5,470,598 $ 5,506,379 $ 246,050 $ 249,229

Ratio of Fair Value to Amortized Cost

100.7 % 101.3 %

The following represents gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities available for sale and held to maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2014.

Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total
Number of Unrealized Fair Number of Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair

June 30, 2014:

Securities Losses Value Securities Losses Value Losses Value
($ in Thousands)

Investment securities available for sale:

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

13 $ (11 ) $ 5,281 21 $ (91 ) $ 9,066 $ (102 ) $ 14,347

Residential mortgage-related securities:

GSE

8 (131 ) 47,505 63 (40,020 ) 1,452,736 (40,151 ) 1,500,241

Private-label

2 (1 ) 34 (1 ) 34

GNMA commercial mortgage-related securities

9 (1,081 ) 216,723 15 (22,600 ) 396,357 (23,681 ) 613,080

Asset backed securities

2 (1 ) 19,395 (1 ) 19,395

Total

$ (1,224 ) $ 288,904 $ (62,712 ) $ 1,858,193 $ (63,936 ) $ 2,147,097

Investment securities held to maturity:

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

44 $ (168 ) $ 19,880 132 $ (1,298 ) $ 59,720 $ (1,466 ) $ 79,600

Total

$ (168 ) $ 19,880 $ (1,298 ) $ 59,720 $ (1,466 ) $ 79,600

14


Table of Contents

For comparative purposes, the following represents gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities available for sale and held to maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2013.

Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total
Number Number
of Unrealized of Unrealized Unrealized

December 31, 2013:

Securities Losses Fair Value Securities Losses Fair Value Losses Fair Value
($ in Thousands)

Investment securities available for sale:

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

113 $ (1,525 ) $ 47,044 1 $ (8 ) $ 273 $ (1,533 ) $ 47,317

Residential mortgage-related securities:

GSE

106 (57,393 ) 1,887,784 15 (21,186 ) 421,082 (78,579 ) 2,308,866

Private-label

2 (37 ) 2,105 1 35 (37 ) 2,140

GNMA commercial mortgage-related securities

19 (23,854 ) 443,462 1 (3,988 ) 45,950 (27,842 ) 489,412

Other debt securities

5 (43 ) 6,452 (43 ) 6,452

Total

$ (82,852 ) $ 2,386,847 $ (25,182 ) $ 467,340 $ (108,034 ) $ 2,854,187

Investment securities held to maturity:

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

298 $ (5,339 ) $ 124,435 10 $ (383 ) $ 5,010 $ (5,722 ) $ 129,445

Total

$ (5,339 ) $ 124,435 $ (383 ) $ 5,010 $ (5,722 ) $ 129,445

The Corporation reviews the investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to monitor its exposure to other-than-temporary impairment. A determination as to whether a security’s decline in fair value is other-than-temporary takes into consideration numerous factors and the relative significance of any single factor can vary by security. Some factors the Corporation may consider in the other-than-temporary impairment analysis include, the length of time and extent to which the security has been in an unrealized loss position, changes in security ratings, financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, as well as security and industry specific economic conditions. In addition, with regards to its debt securities, the Corporation may also evaluate payment structure, whether there are defaulted payments or expected defaults, prepayment speeds, and the value of any underlying collateral. For certain debt securities in unrealized loss positions, the Corporation prepares cash flow analyses to compare the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security.

Based on the Corporation’s evaluation, management does not believe any unrealized loss at June 30, 2014 represents an other-than-temporary impairment as these unrealized losses are primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and the current market conditions, and not credit deterioration. The unrealized losses reported for residential mortgage-related securities relate to private-label residential mortgage-related securities as well as residential mortgage-related securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises such as the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”). The unrealized losses reported for commercial mortgage-related securities relate to securities issued by GNMA. The Corporation currently does not intend to sell nor does it believe that it will be required to sell the securities contained in the above unrealized losses table before recovery of their amortized cost basis. The improvement in the unrealized loss position of the investment securities portfolio was due to a reduction in the overall level of interest rates from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014, as well as spread compression on mortgage-related and municipal securities, which increased the fair value of investment securities.

15


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the credit loss portion of other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings on debt securities for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

Private-label
Mortgage-
Related
Trust Preferred
Securities Debt Securities Total
($ in Thousands)

Balance of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment at December 31, 2012

$ (532 ) $ (6,336 ) $ (6,868 )

Reduction due to credit impaired securities sold

532 57 589

Balance of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment at December 31, 2013

$ $ (6,279 ) $ (6,279 )

Reduction due to credit impaired securities sold

4,279 4,279

Balance of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment at June 30, 2014

$ $ (2,000 ) $ (2,000 )

Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Federal Reserve Bank Stocks : The Corporation is required to maintain Federal Reserve stock and FHLB stock as a member of both the Federal Reserve System and the FHLB, and in amounts as required by these institutions. These equity securities are “restricted” in that they can only be sold back to the respective institutions or another member institution at par. Therefore, they are less liquid than other marketable equity securities and their fair value is equal to amortized cost. The Corporation had FHLB stock of $115 million at June 30, 2014 and $110 million at December 31, 2013 and Federal Reserve Bank stock of $71 million at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

The Corporation reviewed these securities for impairment, including but not limited to, consideration of operating performance, the severity and duration of market value declines, as well as its liquidity and funding position. After evaluating all of these considerations, the Corporation believes the cost of these investments will be recovered and no impairment has been recorded on these securities during 2013 or the first six months of 2014.

NOTE 6: Loans, Allowance for Credit Losses, and Credit Quality

The period end loan composition was as follows.

June 30, December 31,
2014 2013
($ in Thousands)

Commercial and industrial

$ 5,616,205 $ 4,822,680

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

1,070,463 1,114,715

Lease financing

51,873 55,483

Commercial and business lending

6,738,541 5,992,878

Commercial real estate—investor

2,990,732 2,939,456

Real estate construction

1,000,421 896,248

Commercial real estate lending

3,991,153 3,835,704

Total commercial

10,729,694 9,828,582

Home equity

1,713,372 1,825,014

Installment and credit cards

469,203 407,074

Residential mortgage

4,132,783 3,835,591

Total consumer

6,315,358 6,067,679

Total loans

$ 17,045,052 $ 15,896,261

16


Table of Contents

A summary of the changes in the allowance for credit losses was as follows.

Six Months Ended Year Ended
June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
($ in Thousands)

Allowance for Loan Losses:

Balance at beginning of period

$ 268,315 $ 297,409

Provision for loan losses

11,500 10,000

Charge offs

(20,468 ) (88,061 )

Recoveries

12,504 48,967

Net charge offs

(7,964 ) (39,094 )

Balance at end of period

$ 271,851 $ 268,315

Allowance for Unfunded Commitments:

Balance at beginning of period

$ 21,900 $ 21,800

Provision for unfunded commitments

(1,500 ) 100

Balance at end of period

$ 20,400 $ 21,900

Allowance for Credit Losses

$ 292,251 $ 290,215

The level of the allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of an amount appropriate to provide for probable credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. In general, the change in the allowance for loan losses is a function of a number of factors, including but not limited to changes in the loan portfolio, net charge offs, trends in past due and impaired loans, and the level of potential problem loans. Management considers the allowance for loan losses a critical accounting policy, as assessing these numerous factors involves significant judgment.

The allowance for unfunded commitments is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities (including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit) and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance is based upon an evaluation of the unfunded credit facilities, including an assessment of historical commitment utilization experience and credit risk grading of the loan. Net adjustments to the allowance for unfunded commitments are included in provision for credit losses in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 12 for additional information on the allowance for unfunded commitments.

17


Table of Contents

A summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the six months ended June 30, 2014, was as follows.

$ in Thousands Commercial
and
industrial
Commercial
real
estate - owner
occupied
Lease
financing
Commercial
real
estate - investor
Real
estate
construction
Home
equity
Installment
and credit
cards
Residential
mortgage
Total

Balance at Dec 31, 2013

$ 104,501 $ 19,476 $ 1,607 $ 58,156 $ 23,418 $ 32,196 $ 2,416 $ 26,545 $ 268,315

Provision for loan losses

18,684 1,638 674 (6,232 ) (3,092 ) 133 (628 ) 323 11,500

Charge offs

(7,912 ) (437 ) (29 ) (775 ) (1,232 ) (7,056 ) (690 ) (2,337 ) (20,468 )

Recoveries

6,564 1,111 2,045 324 1,833 330 297 12,504

Balance at Jun 30, 2014

$ 121,837 $ 21,788 $ 2,252 $ 53,194 $ 19,418 $ 27,106 $ 1,428 $ 24,828 $ 271,851

Allowance for loan losses:

Ending balance impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment

$ 8,329 $ 2,524 $ 620 $ 3,598 $ 162 $ 5 $ $ 27 $ 15,265

Ending balance impaired loans collectively evaluated for impairment

$ 2,985 $ 2,312 $ 3 $ 3,520 $ 1,368 $ 11,668 $ 282 $ 11,082 $ 33,220

Total impaired loans

$ 11,314 $ 4,836 $ 623 $ 7,118 $ 1,530 $ 11,673 $ 282 $ 11,109 $ 48,485

Ending balance all other loans collectively evaluated for impairment

$ 110,523 $ 16,952 $ 1,629 $ 46,076 $ 17,888 $ 15,433 $ 1,146 $ 13,719 $ 223,366

Total

$ 121,837 $ 21,788 $ 2,252 $ 53,194 $ 19,418 $ 27,106 $ 1,428 $ 24,828 $ 271,851

Loans:

Ending balance impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment

$ 34,371 $ 24,998 $ 1,532 $ 23,958 $ 4,045 $ 1,039 $ $ 10,069 $ 100,012

Ending balance impaired loans collectively evaluated for impairment

$ 35,324 $ 18,895 $ 9 $ 45,935 $ 4,167 $ 30,278 $ 1,956 $ 57,031 $ 193,595

Total impaired loans

$ 69,695 $ 43,893 $ 1,541 $ 69,893 $ 8,212 $ 31,317 $ 1,956 $ 67,100 $ 293,607

Ending balance all other loans collectively evaluated for impairment

$ 5,546,510 $ 1,026,570 $ 50,332 $ 2,920,839 $ 992,209 $ 1,682,055 $ 467,247 $ 4,065,683 $ 16,751,445

Total

$ 5,616,205 $ 1,070,463 $ 51,873 $ 2,990,732 $ 1,000,421 $ 1,713,372 $ 469,203 $ 4,132,783 $ 17,045,052

The allocation methodology used by the Corporation includes allocations for specifically identified impaired loans and loss factor allocations (used for both criticized and non-criticized loan categories), with a component primarily based on historical loss rates and a component primarily based on other qualitative factors. Management allocates the allowance for loan losses by pools of risk within each loan portfolio. The allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan portfolio is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend of future loan losses in any particular category. The total allowance for loan losses is available to absorb losses from any segment of the loan portfolio.

18


Table of Contents

For comparison purposes, a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the year ended December 31, 2013, was as follows.

$ in Thousands Commercial
and
industrial
Commercial
real
estate - owner
occupied
Lease
financing
Commercial
real
estate - investor
Real
estate
construction
Home
equity
Installment Residential
mortgage
Total

Balance at Dec 31, 2012

$ 97,852 $ 27,389 $ 3,024 $ 63,181 $ 20,741 $ 56,826 $ 4,299 $ 24,097 $ 297,409

Provision for loan losses

12,930 (1,778 ) (1,429 ) (2,140 ) 541 (8,213 ) (2,127 ) 12,216 10,000

Charge offs

(35,146 ) (6,474 ) (206 ) (9,846 ) (3,375 ) (20,629 ) (1,389 ) (10,996 ) (88,061 )

Recoveries

28,865 339 218 6,961 5,511 4,212 1,633 1,228 48,967

Balance at Dec 31, 2013

$ 104,501 $ 19,476 $ 1,607 $ 58,156 $ 23,418 $ 32,196 $ 2,416 $ 26,545 $ 268,315

Allowance for loan losses:

Ending balance impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment

$ 7,994 $ 1,019 $ $ 3,932 $ 254 $ 123 $ $ 315 $ 13,637

Ending balance impaired loans collectively evaluated for impairment

$ 3,923 $ 1,936 $ 29 $ 3,963 $ 2,162 $ 13,866 $ 487 $ 11,872 $ 38,238

Total impaired loans

$ 11,917 $ 2,955 $ 29 $ 7,895 $ 2,416 $ 13,989 $ 487 $ 12,187 $ 51,875

Ending balance all other loans collectively evaluated for impairment

$ 92,584 $ 16,521 $ 1,578 $ 50,261 $ 21,002 $ 18,207 $ 1,929 $ 14,358 $ 216,440

Total

$ 104,501 $ 19,476 $ 1,607 $ 58,156 $ 23,418 $ 32,196 $ 2,416 $ 26,545 $ 268,315

Loans:

Ending balance impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment

$ 29,343 $ 24,744 $ $ 32,367 $ 3,777 $ 929 $ $ 10,526 $ 101,686

Ending balance impaired loans collectively evaluated for impairment

$ 40,893 $ 17,929 $ 69 $ 50,175 $ 6,483 $ 33,871 $ 1,360 $ 56,947 $ 207,727

Total impaired loans

$ 70,236 $ 42,673 $ 69 $ 82,542 $ 10,260 $ 34,800 $ 1,360 $ 67,473 $ 309,413

Ending balance all other loans collectively evaluated for impairment

$ 4,752,444 $ 1,072,042 $ 55,414 $ 2,856,914 $ 885,988 $ 1,790,214 $ 405,714 $ 3,768,118 $ 15,586,848

Total

$ 4,822,680 $ 1,114,715 $ 55,483 $ 2,939,456 $ 896,248 $ 1,825,014 $ 407,074 $ 3,835,591 $ 15,896,261

19


Table of Contents

The following table presents commercial loans by credit quality indicator at June 30, 2014.

Pass Special
Mention
Potential
Problem
Impaired Total
($ in Thousands)

Commercial and industrial

$ 5,230,000 $ 129,259 $ 187,251 $ 69,695 $ 5,616,205

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

928,380 40,433 57,757 43,893 1,070,463

Lease financing

46,724 1,328 2,280 1,541 51,873

Commercial and business lending

6,205,104 171,020 247,288 115,129 6,738,541

Commercial real estate—investor

2,843,155 45,781 31,903 69,893 2,990,732

Real estate construction

984,294 3,442 4,473 8,212 1,000,421

Commercial real estate lending

3,827,449 49,223 36,376 78,105 3,991,153

Total commercial

$ 10,032,553 $ 220,243 $ 283,664 $ 193,234 $ 10,729,694

The following table presents commercial loans by credit quality indicator at December 31, 2013.
Pass Special
Mention
Potential
Problem
Impaired Total
($ in Thousands)

Commercial and industrial

$ 4,485,160 $ 153,615 $ 113,669 $ 70,236 $ 4,822,680

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

959,849 55,404 56,789 42,673 1,114,715

Lease financing

52,733 897 1,784 69 55,483

Commercial and business lending

5,497,742 209,916 172,242 112,978 5,992,878

Commercial real estate—investor

2,740,255 64,230 52,429 82,542 2,939,456

Real estate construction

877,911 2,814 5,263 10,260 896,248

Commercial real estate lending

3,618,166 67,044 57,692 92,802 3,835,704

Total commercial

$ 9,115,908 $ 276,960 $ 229,934 $ 205,780 $ 9,828,582

The following table presents consumer loans by credit quality indicator at June 30, 2014.

Performing 30-89 Days
Past Due
Potential
Problem
Impaired Total
($ in Thousands)

Home equity

$ 1,670,147 $ 10,809 $ 1,099 $ 31,317 $ 1,713,372

Installment and credit cards

464,669 1,734 844 1,956 469,203

Residential mortgage

4,056,168 7,070 2,445 67,100 4,132,783

Total consumer

$ 6,190,984 $ 19,613 $ 4,388 $ 100,373 $ 6,315,358

The following table presents consumer loans by credit quality indicator at December 31, 2013.
Performing 30-89 Days
Past Due
Potential
Problem
Impaired Total
($ in Thousands)

Home equity

$ 1,777,421 $ 10,680 $ 2,113 $ 34,800 $ 1,825,014

Installment

404,514 1,150 50 1,360 407,074

Residential mortgage

3,758,688 6,118 3,312 67,473 3,835,591

Total consumer

$ 5,940,623 $ 17,948 $ 5,475 $ 103,633 $ 6,067,679

Factors that are important to managing overall credit quality are sound loan underwriting and administration, systematic monitoring of existing loans and commitments, effective loan review on an ongoing basis, early identification of potential problems, and appropriate allowance for credit losses, nonaccrual and charge off policies.

For commercial loans, management has determined the pass credit quality indicator to include credits that exhibit acceptable financial statements, cash flow, and leverage. If any risk exists, it is mitigated by the loan structure, collateral, monitoring, or control. For consumer loans, performing loans include credits that are performing in accordance with the original contractual terms. Loans are

20


Table of Contents

considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Special mention credits have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the credit. Potential problem loans are considered inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or the collateral pledged. These loans generally have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses that may jeopardize liquidation of the debt and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Corporation will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Lastly, management considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the note agreement, including both principal and interest. Management has determined that commercial and consumer loan relationships that have nonaccrual status or have had their terms restructured in a troubled debt restructuring meet this impaired loan definition. Commercial loans classified as special mention, potential problem, and impaired are reviewed at a minimum on a quarterly basis, while pass and performing rated credits are reviewed on an annual basis or more frequently if the loan renewal is less than one year or if otherwise warranted.

21


Table of Contents

The following table presents loans by past due status at June 30, 2014.

30-59 Days
Past Due
60-89 Days
Past Due
90 Days or More
Past Due *
Total Past Due Current Total
($ in Thousands)

Accruing loans

Commercial and industrial

$ 1,447 $ 1,072 $ 289 $ 2,808 $ 5,572,551 $ 5,575,359

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

3,087 3,236 6,323 1,032,415 1,038,738

Lease financing

556 556 49,776 50,332

Commercial and business lending

4,534 4,864 289 9,687 6,654,742 6,664,429

Commercial real estate—investor

772 2,222 2,994 2,959,603 2,962,597

Real estate construction

258 258 993,175 993,433

Commercial real estate lending

1,030 2,222 3,252 3,952,778 3,956,030

Total commercial

5,564 7,086 289 12,939 10,607,520 10,620,459

Home equity

8,299 2,510 10,809 1,681,690 1,692,499

Installment and credit cards

1,054 680 1,435 3,169 465,263 468,432

Residential mortgage

6,954 116 53 7,123 4,077,313 4,084,436

Total consumer

16,307 3,306 1,488 21,101 6,224,266 6,245,367

Total accruing loans

$ 21,871 $ 10,392 $ 1,777 $ 34,040 $ 16,831,786 $ 16,865,826

Nonaccrual loans

Commercial and industrial

$ 772 $ 1,575 $ 4,775 $ 7,122 $ 33,724 $ 40,846

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

807 184 12,684 13,675 18,050 31,725

Lease financing

1,532 9 1,541 1,541

Commercial and business lending

1,579 3,291 17,468 22,338 51,774 74,112

Commercial real estate—investor

1,238 14,616 15,854 12,281 28,135

Real estate construction

178 51 1,776 2,005 4,983 6,988

Commercial real estate lending

178 1,289 16,392 17,859 17,264 35,123

Total commercial

1,757 4,580 33,860 40,197 69,038 109,235

Home equity

1,631 1,936 10,214 13,781 7,092 20,873

Installment and credit cards

97 40 216 353 418 771

Residential mortgage

3,014 5,440 21,676 30,130 18,217 48,347

Total consumer

4,742 7,416 32,106 44,264 25,727 69,991

Total nonaccrual loans

$ 6,499 $ 11,996 $ 65,966 $ 84,461 $ 94,765 $ 179,226

Total loans

Commercial and industrial

$ 2,219 $ 2,647 $ 5,064 $ 9,930 $ 5,606,275 $ 5,616,205

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

3,894 3,420 12,684 19,998 1,050,465 1,070,463

Lease financing

2,088 9 2,097 49,776 51,873

Commercial and business lending

6,113 8,155 17,757 32,025 6,706,516 6,738,541

Commercial real estate—investor

772 3,460 14,616 18,848 2,971,884 2,990,732

Real estate construction

436 51 1,776 2,263 998,158 1,000,421

Commercial real estate lending

1,208 3,511 16,392 21,111 3,970,042 3,991,153

Total commercial

7,321 11,666 34,149 53,136 10,676,558 10,729,694

Home equity

9,930 4,446 10,214 24,590 1,688,782 1,713,372

Installment and credit cards

1,151 720 1,651 3,522 465,681 469,203

Residential mortgage

9,968 5,556 21,729 37,253 4,095,530 4,132,783

Total consumer

21,049 10,722 33,594 65,365 6,249,993 6,315,358

Total loans

$ 28,370 $ 22,388 $ 67,743 $ 118,501 $ 16,926,551 $ 17,045,052

* The recorded investment in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing totaled $2 million at June 30, 2014 (the same as the reported balances for the accruing loans noted above).

22


Table of Contents

The following table presents loans by past due status at December 31, 2013.

30-59 Days
Past Due
60-89 Days
Past Due
90 Days or More
Past Due *
Total Past Due Current Total
($ in Thousands)

Accruing loans

Commercial and industrial

$ 3,390 $ 3,436 $ 1,199 $ 8,025 $ 4,776,936 $ 4,784,961

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

1,015 2,091 3,106 1,081,945 1,085,051

Lease financing

55,414 55,414

Commercial and business lending

4,405 5,527 1,199 11,131 5,914,295 5,925,426

Commercial real estate—investor

9,081 14,134 23,215 2,878,645 2,901,860

Real estate construction

836 1,118 1,954 887,827 889,781

Commercial real estate lending

9,917 15,252 25,169 3,766,472 3,791,641

Total commercial

14,322 20,779 1,199 36,300 9,680,767 9,717,067

Home equity

8,611 2,069 346 11,026 1,788,821 1,799,847

Installment

885 265 637 1,787 404,173 405,960

Residential mortgage

5,253 865 168 6,286 3,781,673 3,787,959

Total consumer

14,749 3,199 1,151 19,099 5,974,667 5,993,766

Total accruing loans

$ 29,071 $ 23,978 $ 2,350 $ 55,399 $ 15,655,434 $ 15,710,833

Nonaccrual loans

Commercial and industrial

$ 998 $ 1,764 $ 9,765 $ 12,527 $ 25,192 $ 37,719

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

2,482 1,724 11,125 15,331 14,333 29,664

Lease financing

69 69 69

Commercial and business lending

3,480 3,488 20,959 27,927 39,525 67,452

Commercial real estate—investor

3,408 899 20,466 24,773 12,823 37,596

Real estate construction

2,376 2,267 4,643 1,824 6,467

Commercial real estate lending

5,784 899 22,733 29,416 14,647 44,063

Total commercial

9,264 4,387 43,692 57,343 54,172 111,515

Home equity

1,725 1,635 14,331 17,691 7,476 25,167

Installment

129 24 289 442 672 1,114

Residential mortgage

3,199 3,257 26,201 32,657 14,975 47,632

Total consumer

5,053 4,916 40,821 50,790 23,123 73,913

Total nonaccrual loans

$ 14,317 $ 9,303 $ 84,513 $ 108,133 $ 77,295 $ 185,428

Total loans

Commercial and industrial

$ 4,388 $ 5,200 $ 10,964 $ 20,552 $ 4,802,128 $ 4,822,680

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

3,497 3,815 11,125 18,437 1,096,278 1,114,715

Lease financing

69 69 55,414 55,483

Commercial and business lending

7,885 9,015 22,158 39,058 5,953,820 5,992,878

Commercial real estate—investor

12,489 15,033 20,466 47,988 2,891,468 2,939,456

Real estate construction

3,212 1,118 2,267 6,597 889,651 896,248

Commercial real estate lending

15,701 16,151 22,733 54,585 3,781,119 3,835,704

Total commercial

23,586 25,166 44,891 93,643 9,734,939 9,828,582

Home equity

10,336 3,704 14,677 28,717 1,796,297 1,825,014

Installment

1,014 289 926 2,229 404,845 407,074

Residential mortgage

8,452 4,122 26,369 38,943 3,796,648 3,835,591

Total consumer

19,802 8,115 41,972 69,889 5,997,790 6,067,679

Total loans

$ 43,388 $ 33,281 $ 86,863 $ 163,532 $ 15,732,729 $ 15,896,261

* The recorded investment in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing totaled $2 million at December 31, 2013 (the same as the reported balances for the accruing loans noted above).

23


Table of Contents

The following table presents impaired loans at June 30, 2014.

Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
YTD
Average
Recorded
Investment
YTD Interest
Income
Recognized(a)
($ in Thousands)

Loans with a related allowance

Commercial and industrial

$ 61,673 $ 68,860 $ 11,314 $ 63,375 $ 574

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

26,477 29,237 4,836 27,144 380

Lease financing

1,541 1,541 623 1,548

Commercial and business lending

89,691 99,638 16,773 92,067 954

Commercial real estate—investor

60,614 64,582 7,118 61,367 1,126

Real estate construction

6,407 10,249 1,530 6,847 53

Commercial real estate lending

67,021 74,831 8,648 68,214 1,179

Total commercial

156,712 174,469 25,421 160,281 2,133

Home equity

30,456 34,346 11,673 31,114 704

Installment and credit cards

1,956 2,180 282 2,033 30

Residential mortgage

58,169 62,548 11,109 58,824 888

Total consumer

90,581 99,074 23,064 91,971 1,622

Total loans

$ 247,293 $ 273,543 $ 48,485 $ 252,252 $ 3,755

Loans with no related allowance

Commercial and industrial

$ 8,022 $ 13,598 $ $ 9,749 $ 9

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

17,416 20,810 17,867 35

Lease financing

Commercial and business lending

25,438 34,408 27,616 44

Commercial real estate—investor

9,279 13,400 9,406 44

Real estate construction

1,805 2,953 2,379 24

Commercial real estate lending

11,084 16,353 11,785 68

Total commercial

36,522 50,761 39,401 112

Home equity

861 865 869 14

Installment and credit cards

Residential mortgage

8,931 9,050 8,971 59

Total consumer

9,792 9,915 9,840 73

Total loans

$ 46,314 $ 60,676 $ $ 49,241 $ 185

Total

Commercial and industrial

$ 69,695 $ 82,458 $ 11,314 $ 73,124 $ 583

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

43,893 50,047 4,836 45,011 415

Lease financing

1,541 1,541 623 1,548

Commercial and business lending

115,129 134,046 16,773 119,683 998

Commercial real estate—investor

69,893 77,982 7,118 70,773 1,170

Real estate construction

8,212 13,202 1,530 9,226 77

Commercial real estate lending

78,105 91,184 8,648 79,999 1,247

Total commercial

193,234 225,230 25,421 199,682 2,245

Home equity

31,317 35,211 11,673 31,983 718

Installment and credit cards

1,956 2,180 282 2,033 30

Residential mortgage

67,100 71,598 11,109 67,795 947

Total consumer

100,373 108,989 23,064 101,811 1,695

Total loans(b)

$ 293,607 $ 334,219 $ 48,485 $ 301,493 $ 3,940

(a) Interest income recognized included $3 million of interest income recognized on accruing restructured loans for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
(b) The fair value mark on impaired loans at June 30, 2014, was 73%. The fair value mark is calculated as the recorded investment, net of the related allowance, divided by the unpaid principal balance.

24


Table of Contents

The following table presents impaired loans at December 31, 2013.

Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
YTD
Average
Recorded
Investment
YTD Interest
Income
Recognized
(a)
($ in Thousands)

Loans with a related allowance

Commercial and industrial

$ 57,857 $ 65,443 $ 11,917 $ 61,000 $ 1,741

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

22,651 25,072 2,955 24,549 995

Lease financing

69 69 29 76

Commercial and business lending

80,577 90,584 14,901 85,625 2,736

Commercial real estate—investor

64,647 68,228 7,895 68,776 2,735

Real estate construction

8,815 12,535 2,416 9,796 236

Commercial real estate lending

73,462 80,763 10,311 78,572 2,971

Total commercial

154,039 171,347 25,212 164,197 5,707

Home equity

34,707 40,344 13,989 36,623 1,518

Installment

1,360 1,676 487 1,753 100

Residential mortgage

60,157 69,699 12,187 62,211 1,861

Total consumer

96,224 111,719 26,663 100,587 3,479

Total loans

$ 250,263 $ 283,066 $ 51,875 $ 264,784 $ 9,186

Loans with no related allowance

Commercial and industrial

$ 12,379 $ 19,556 $ $ 14,291 $ 306

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

20,022 22,831 20,602 315

Lease financing

Commercial and business lending

32,401 42,387 34,893 621

Commercial real estate—investor

17,895 25,449 19,354 130

Real estate construction

1,445 1,853 1,576 13

Commercial real estate lending

19,340 27,302 20,930 143

Total commercial

51,741 69,689 55,823 764

Home equity

93 92 94 2

Installment

Residential mortgage

7,316 8,847 7,321 185

Total consumer

7,409 8,939 7,415 187

Total loans

$ 59,150 $ 78,628 $ $ 63,238 $ 951

Total

Commercial and industrial

$ 70,236 $ 84,999 $ 11,917 $ 75,291 $ 2,047

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

42,673 47,903 2,955 45,151 1,310

Lease financing

69 69 29 76

Commercial and business lending

112,978 132,971 14,901 120,518 3,357

Commercial real estate—investor

82,542 93,677 7,895 88,130 2,865

Real estate construction

10,260 14,388 2,416 11,372 249

Commercial real estate lending

92,802 108,065 10,311 99,502 3,114

Total commercial

205,780 241,036 25,212 220,020 6,471

Home equity

34,800 40,436 13,989 36,717 1,520

Installment

1,360 1,676 487 1,753 100

Residential mortgage

67,473 78,546 12,187 69,532 2,046

Total consumer

103,633 120,658 26,663 108,002 3,666

Total loans (b)

$ 309,413 $ 361,694 $ 51,875 $ 328,022 $ 10,137

(a) Interest income recognized included $6 million of interest income recognized on accruing restructured loans for the year ended December 31, 2013.
(b) The fair value mark on impaired loans at December 31, 2013, was 71%. The fair value mark is calculated as the recorded investment, net of the related allowance, divided by the unpaid principal balance.

25


Table of Contents

Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that may adversely impact the collectability of principal or interest on loans, it is management’s practice to place such loans on nonaccrual status immediately, rather than delaying such action until the loans become 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed, amortization of related deferred loan fees or costs is suspended, and income is recorded only to the extent that interest payments are subsequently received in cash and a determination has been made that the principal and interest of the loan is collectible. If collectability of the principal and interest is in doubt, payments received are applied to loan principal.

While an asset is in nonaccrual status, some or all of the cash interest payments received may be treated as interest income on a cash basis as long as the remaining recorded investment in the asset (i.e., after charge off of identified losses, if any) is deemed to be fully collectible. The determination as to the ultimate collectability of the asset’s remaining recorded investment must be supported by a current, well documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and prospects for repayment, including consideration of the borrower’s sustained historical repayment performance and other relevant factors. A nonaccrual loan is returned to accrual status when all delinquent principal and interest payments become current in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement, the borrower has demonstrated a period of sustained performance, and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. A sustained period of repayment performance generally would be a minimum of six months.

Troubled Debt Restructurings (“Restructured Loans”):

Loans are considered restructured loans if concessions have been granted to borrowers that are experiencing financial difficulty. The concessions granted generally involve the modification of terms of the loan, such as changes in payment schedule or interest rate, which generally would not otherwise be considered. Restructured loans can involve loans remaining on nonaccrual, moving to nonaccrual, or continuing on accrual status, depending on the individual facts and circumstances of the borrower. Nonaccrual restructured loans are included and treated with all other nonaccrual loans. In addition, all accruing restructured loans are reported as troubled debt restructurings, which are considered and accounted for as impaired loans. Generally, restructured loans remain on nonaccrual until the customer has attained a sustained period of repayment performance under the modified loan terms (generally a minimum of six months). However, performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events that coincide with the restructuring, are considered in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and whether the loan should be returned or maintained on accrual status. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not reasonably assured, the loan remains on nonaccrual status. The Corporation had a $17 million recorded investment in loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring for the six months ended June 30, 2014, of which $2 million were in accrual status and $15 million were in nonaccrual pending a sustained period of repayment.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were $72 million and $60 million, respectively, of nonaccrual restructured loans, and $114 million and $124 million, respectively, of performing restructured loans, included within impaired loans. All restructured loans are considered impaired in the calendar year of restructuring. In subsequent years, a restructured loan may cease being classified as impaired if the loan was modified at a market rate and has performed according to the modified terms for at least six months. A loan that has been modified at a below market rate will return to performing status if it satisfies the six month performance requirement; however, it will remain classified as a restructured loan. The following table presents nonaccrual and performing restructured loans by loan portfolio.

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
Performing
Restructured
Loans
Nonaccrual
Restructured
Loans *
Performing
Restructured
Loans
Nonaccrual
Restructured
Loans *
($ in Thousands)

Commercial and industrial

$ 28,849 $ 8,150 $ 32,517 $ 6,900

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

12,168 15,126 13,009 10,999

Commercial real estate—investor

41,758 15,627 44,946 18,069

Real estate construction

1,224 3,028 3,793 2,065

Home equity

10,444 6,736 9,633 5,419

Installment and credit cards

1,185 249 246 451

Residential mortgage

18,753 23,472 19,841 15,682

Total

$ 114,381 $ 72,388 $ 123,985 $ 59,585

* Nonaccrual restructured loans have been included with nonaccrual loans.

26


Table of Contents

The following table provides the number of loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring by loan portfolio during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, and the recorded investment and unpaid principal balance as of June 30, 2014.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Number of
Loans
Recorded
Investment (1)
Unpaid
Principal
Balance (2)
Number of
Loans
Recorded
Investment (1)
Unpaid
Principal
Balance (2)
($ in Thousands)

Commercial and industrial

3 $ 526 $ 534 11 $ 3,889 $ 7,736

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

1 894 894 5 6,096 6,652

Commercial real estate—investor

1 493 508

Real estate construction

1 6 6 1 6 6

Home equity

35 1,630 1,723 62 2,476 2,693

Installment and credit cards

1 16 16 2 25 35

Residential mortgage

28 1,942 2,435 48 4,430 5,103

Total

69 $ 5,014 $ 5,608 130 $ 17,415 $ 22,733

(1) Represents post-modification outstanding recorded investment.
(2) Represents pre-modification outstanding recorded investment.

The following table provides the number of loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring by loan portfolio during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, and the recorded investment and unpaid principal balance as of June 30, 2013.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Number of
Loans
Recorded
Investment (1)
Unpaid
Principal
Balance (2)
Number of
Loans
Recorded
Investment (1)
Unpaid
Principal
Balance (2)
($ in Thousands)

Commercial and industrial

25 $ 4,323 $ 4,414 43 $ 6,401 $ 8,074

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

7 4,086 4,194 10 6,270 6,388

Commercial real estate—investor

3 1,801 1,948 8 3,822 4,029

Real estate construction

2 51 80 7 2,004 2,057

Home equity

29 2,114 2,640 62 3,580 4,192

Installment

1 34 34 2 199 202

Residential mortgage

26 3,482 3,879 56 5,365 6,072

Total

93 $ 15,891 $ 17,189 188 $ 27,641 $ 31,014

(1) Represents post-modification outstanding recorded investment.
(2) Represents pre-modification outstanding recorded investment.

Restructured loan modifications may include payment schedule modifications, interest rate concessions, maturity date extensions, modification of note structure (A/B Note), non-reaffirmed Chapter 7 bankruptcies, principal reduction, or some combination of these concessions. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, restructured loan modifications of commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans primarily included maturity date extensions and payment schedule modifications. Restructured loan modifications of home equity and residential mortgage loans primarily included maturity date extensions, interest rate concessions, payment schedule modifications, non-reaffirmed Chapter 7 bankruptcies, or a combination of these concessions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

27


Table of Contents

The following table provides the number of loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the previous 12 months which subsequently defaulted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, as well as the recorded investment in these restructured loans as of June 30, 2014.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Number of Loans Recorded Investment Number of Loans Recorded Investment
($ in Thousands)

Commercial and industrial

2 $ 135 2 $ 135

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

2 612 2 612

Commercial real estate—investor

1 1,291 1 1,291

Real estate construction

1 161

Home equity

13 414 18 651

Installment and credit cards

1 16 2 25

Residential mortgage

20 1,565 32 3,334

Total

39 $ 4,033 58 $ 6,209

The following table provides the number of loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the previous 12 months which subsequently defaulted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as well as the recorded investment in these restructured loans as of June 30, 2013.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Number of Loans Recorded Investment Number of Loans Recorded Investment
($ in Thousands)

Commercial and industrial

15 $ 711 22 $ 1,798

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

2 43 3 115

Commercial real estate—investor

2 82 5 1,598

Real estate construction

2 41 2 41

Home equity

10 633 13 740

Residential mortgage

7 952 10 1,405

Total

38 $ 2,462 55 $ 5,697

All loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are evaluated for impairment. The nature and extent of the impairment of restructured loans, including those which have experienced a subsequent payment default, is considered in the determination of an appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses.

28


Table of Contents

NOTE 7: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill: Goodwill is not amortized but, instead, is subject to impairment tests on at least an annual basis, and more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The impairment testing process is conducted by assigning net assets and goodwill to each reporting unit. An initial qualitative evaluation is made to assess the likelihood of impairment and determine whether further quantitative testing to calculate the fair value is necessary. When the qualitative evaluation indicates that impairment is more likely than not, quantitative testing is required whereby the fair value of each reporting unit is calculated and compared to the recorded book value, “step one.” If the calculated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and “step two” is not considered necessary. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its calculated fair value, the impairment test continues (“step two”) by comparing the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value is computed by adjusting all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to current fair value with the offset adjustment to goodwill. The adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value of the goodwill. An impairment charge is recognized if the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill.

The Corporation conducted its annual impairment testing in May 2014, utilizing a qualitative assessment. Factors that management considered in this assessment included macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, overall financial performance of the Corporation and each reporting unit (both current and projected), changes in management strategy, and changes in the composition or carrying amount of net assets. In addition, management considered the increases in both the Corporation’s common stock price and in the overall bank common stock index (based on the Nasdaq bank index), as well as the Corporation’s earnings per common share trend over the past year. Based on these assessments, management concluded that the 2014 annual qualitative impairment assessment indicated that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value exceeded the carrying value (including goodwill) for each reporting unit. Therefore, a step one quantitative analysis was not required. There were no impairment charges recorded in 2013 or through June 30, 2014.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation had goodwill of $929 million, including goodwill of $428 million assigned to the Corporate and Commercial Banking reporting unit and goodwill of $501 million assigned to the Community and Consumer Banking reporting unit. There was no change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and the year ended December 31, 2013.

Other Intangible Assets: The Corporation has other intangible assets that are amortized, consisting of core deposit intangibles, other intangibles (primarily related to customer relationships acquired in connection with the Corporation’s insurance agency acquisitions), and mortgage servicing rights. For core deposit intangibles and other intangibles, changes in the gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization, and net book value were as follows.

Six Months Ended Year Ended
June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
($ in Thousands)

Core deposit intangibles:

Gross carrying amount

$ 36,230 $ 36,230

Accumulated amortization

(33,107 ) (31,565 )

Net book value

$ 3,123 $ 4,665

Amortization during the period

$ 1,542 $ 3,122

Other intangibles:

Gross carrying amount

$ 19,283 $ 19,283

Accumulated amortization

(13,204 ) (12,764 )

Net book value

$ 6,079 $ 6,519

Amortization during the period

$ 440 $ 921

The Corporation sells residential mortgage loans in the secondary market and typically retains the right to service the loans sold. Upon sale, a mortgage servicing rights asset is capitalized, which represents the then current fair value of future net cash flows expected to be realized for performing servicing activities. Mortgage servicing rights, when purchased, are initially recorded at fair

29


Table of Contents

value. As the Corporation has not elected to subsequently measure any class of servicing assets under the fair value measurement method, the Corporation follows the amortization method. Mortgage servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income, and assessed for impairment at each reporting date. Mortgage servicing rights are carried at the lower of the initial capitalized amount, net of accumulated amortization, or estimated fair value, and are included in other intangible assets, net, in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Corporation periodically evaluates its mortgage servicing rights asset for impairment. Impairment is assessed based on fair value at each reporting date using estimated prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgage loans serviced and stratifications based on the risk characteristics of the underlying loans (predominantly loan type and note interest rate). As mortgage interest rates fall, prepayment speeds are usually faster and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally decreases, requiring additional valuation reserve. Conversely, as mortgage interest rates rise, prepayment speeds are usually slower and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally increases, requiring less valuation reserve. A valuation allowance is established, through a charge to earnings, to the extent the amortized cost of the mortgage servicing rights exceeds the estimated fair value by stratification. If it is later determined that all or a portion of the temporary impairment no longer exists for a stratification, the valuation is reduced through a recovery to earnings. An other-than-temporary impairment (i.e., recoverability is considered remote when considering interest rates and loan pay off activity) is recognized as a write-down of the mortgage servicing rights asset and the related valuation allowance (to the extent a valuation allowance is available) and then against earnings. A direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of the mortgage servicing rights asset and valuation allowance, precluding subsequent recoveries. See Note 12 for a discussion of the recourse provisions on sold residential mortgage loans. See Note 13 which further discusses fair value measurement relative to the mortgage servicing rights asset.

A summary of changes in the balance of the mortgage servicing rights asset and the mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance was as follows.

Six Months Ended Year Ended
June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
($ in Thousands)

Mortgage servicing rights:

Mortgage servicing rights at beginning of period

$ 64,193 $ 61,425

Additions

3,720 18,256

Amortization

(5,545 ) (15,488 )

Mortgage servicing rights at end of period

$ 62,368 $ 64,193

Valuation allowance at beginning of period

(913 ) (15,476 )

(Additions) recoveries, net

(119 ) 14,563

Valuation allowance at end of period

(1,032 ) (913 )

Mortgage servicing rights, net

$ 61,336 $ 63,280

Fair value of mortgage servicing rights

$ 67,699 $ 74,444

Portfolio of residential mortgage loans serviced for others (“servicing portfolio”)

8,052,000 8,084,000

Mortgage servicing rights, net to servicing portfolio

0.76 % 0.78 %

Mortgage servicing rights expense (1)

$ 5,664 $ 925

(1) Includes the amortization of mortgage servicing rights and additions/recoveries to the valuation allowance of mortgage servicing rights, and is a component of mortgage banking, net, in the consolidated statements of income.

30


Table of Contents

The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for amortizing intangible assets. The projections of amortization expense are based on existing asset balances, the current interest rate environment, and prepayment speeds as of June 30, 2014. The actual amortization expense the Corporation recognizes in any given period may be significantly different depending upon acquisition or sale activities, changes in interest rates, prepayment speeds, market conditions, regulatory requirements, and events or circumstances that indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Core Deposit Other Mortgage Servicing
Intangibles Intangibles Rights
($ in Thousands)

Estimated amortization expense:

Six months ending December 31, 2014

$ 1,326 $ 439 $ 5,603

Year ending December 31, 2015

1,404 839 9,662

Year ending December 31, 2016

281 803 7,934

Year ending December 31, 2017

112 770 6,550

Year ending December 31, 2018

740 5,431

Year ending December 31, 2019

441 4,530

Beyond 2019

2,047 22,658

Total Estimated Amortization Expense

$ 3,123 $ 6,079 $ 62,368

NOTE 8: Short and Long-Term Funding

The components of short-term funding (funding with original contractual maturities of one year or less) and long-term funding (funding with original contractual maturities greater than one year) were as follows.

June 30, December 31,
2014 2013
($ in Thousands)

Short-Term Funding

Federal funds purchased

$ 269,165 $ 56,195

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

689,886 419,247

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

959,051 475,442

FHLB advances

1,300,000 200,000

Commercial paper

78,120 65,484

Other short-term funding

1,378,120 265,484

Total short-term funding

$ 2,337,171 $ 740,926

Long-Term Funding

FHLB advances

$ 2,500,278 $ 2,500,297

Senior notes, at par

430,000 585,000

Other long-term funding and capitalized costs

1,531 1,970

Total long-term funding

$ 2,931,809 $ 3,087,267

Total short and long-term funding

$ 5,268,980 $ 3,828,193

Short-term funding:

The FHLB advances included in short-term funding are those with original contractual maturities of one year or less. The securities sold under agreements to repurchase represent short-term funding which is collateralized by securities of the U.S. Government or its agencies.

Long-term funding:

FHLB advances: At June 30, 2014, the long-term FHLB advances had a weighted-average interest rate of 0.12%, compared to 0.10% at December 31, 2013. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Corporation executed $2.5 billion of five year, variable rate FHLB advances that are putable, at our option, without penalty after six months. The FHLB advances are indexed to the FHLB discount note plus 6 basis points and reprice at varying intervals, including $1.0 billion repricing at four week intervals, $750 million repricing at 13 week intervals, and $750 million repricing daily. The advances offer flexible, low cost, long-term funding that improves the Corporation’s liquidity profile.

31


Table of Contents

Senior notes: In March 2011, the Corporation issued $300 million of senior notes at a discount. In September 2011, the Corporation issued an additional $130 million of senior notes at a premium. The 2011 senior note issuances mature on March 28, 2016 and have a fixed coupon interest rate of 5.125%. In September 2012, the Corporation issued $155 million of senior notes at a discount. The Corporation redeemed the 2012 senior notes during February 2014.

NOTE 9: Income Taxes

The Corporation recognized income tax expense of $42 million for the first half of 2014, compared to income tax expense of $44 million for the first half of 2013. The effective tax rate was 31.60% for the first half of 2014, compared to an effective tax rate of 31.57% for the first half of 2013.

NOTE 10: Derivative and Hedging Activities

The Corporation facilitates customer borrowing activity by providing various interest rate risk management solutions through its capital markets area. To date, all of the notional amounts of customer transactions have been matched with a mirror swap with another counterparty. The Corporation may also use derivative instruments to hedge the variability in interest payments or protect the value of certain assets and liabilities recorded on its consolidated balance sheet from changes in interest rates. The predominant derivative and hedging activities include interest rate-related instruments (swaps and caps), foreign currency exchange forwards, written options, purchased options, and certain mortgage banking activities. The contract or notional amount of a derivative is used to determine, along with the other terms of the derivative, the amounts to be exchanged between the counterparties. The Corporation is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to financial instruments. To mitigate the counterparty risk, interest rate-related instruments generally contain language outlining collateral pledging requirements for each counterparty. Collateral must be posted when the market value exceeds certain threshold limits which are determined from the credit ratings of each counterparty. The Corporation was required to pledge $26 million of investment securities as collateral at June 30, 2014, and pledged $42 million of investment securities as collateral at December 31, 2013. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as of June 10, 2013, the Corporation must clear all LIBOR interest rate swaps through a clearing house. As such, the Corporation is required to pledge cash collateral for the margin. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation posted cash collateral for the margin of $12 million, compared to $6 million at December 31, 2013.

The Corporation’s derivative and hedging instruments are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the Corporation’s interest rate-related instruments is determined using discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative and also includes a nonperformance / credit risk component (credit valuation adjustment). See Note 13 for additional fair value information and disclosures.

32


Table of Contents

The table below identifies the balance sheet category and fair values of the Corporation’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments.

Weighted Average
($ in Thousands) Notional Fair Balance Sheet Receive Pay
Amount Value

Category

Rate (1) Rate (1) Maturity

June 30, 2014

Interest rate-related instruments—customer and mirror

$ 1,713,968 $ 39,839 Trading assets 1.55 % 1.55 % 44 months

Interest rate-related instruments—customer and mirror

1,713,968 (42,683 ) Trading liabilities 1.55 % 1.55 % 44 months

Interest rate lock commitments (mortgage)

144,568 2,050 Other assets

Forward commitments (mortgage)

199,450 (1,658 ) Other liabilities

Foreign currency exchange forwards

60,973 791 Trading assets

Foreign currency exchange forwards

53,978 (628 ) Trading liabilities

Purchased options (time deposit)

112,048 8,355 Other assets

Written options (time deposit)

112,048 (8,355 ) Other liabilities

December 31, 2013

Interest rate-related instruments—customer and mirror

$ 1,821,787 $ 42,980 Trading assets 1.63 % 1.63 % 45 months

Interest rate-related instruments—customer and mirror

1,821,787 (45,815 ) Trading liabilities 1.63 % 1.63 % 45 months

Interest rate lock commitments (mortgage)

102,225 416 Other assets

Forward commitments (mortgage)

135,000 1,301 Other assets

Foreign currency exchange forwards

25,747 748 Trading assets

Foreign currency exchange forwards

24,413 (655 ) Trading liabilities

Purchased options (time deposit)

115,953 7,328 Other assets

Written options (time deposit)

115,953 (7,328 ) Other liabilities

(1) Reflects the weighted average receive rate and pay rate for the interest rate swap derivative financial instruments only.

The table below identifies the income statement category of the gains and losses recognized in income on the Corporation’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments.

Income Statement Category of Gain / (Loss)

Gain / (Loss) Recognized in Income

Recognized in Income
($ in Thousands)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

Interest rate-related instruments—customer and mirror, net

Capital market fees, net $ (9 )

Interest rate lock commitments (mortgage)

Mortgage banking, net 1,634

Forward commitments (mortgage)

Mortgage banking, net (2,959 )

Foreign currency exchange forwards

Capital market fees, net 70

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

Interest rate-related instruments—customer and mirror, net

Capital market fees, net $ 2,799

Interest rate lock commitments (mortgage)

Mortgage banking, net (12,945 )

Forward commitments (mortgage)

Mortgage banking, net 20,460

Foreign currency exchange forwards

Capital market fees, net (33 )

Free standing derivatives

The Corporation enters into various derivative contracts which are designated as free standing derivative contracts. These derivative contracts are not designated against specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or forecasted transactions and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Such derivative contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet with changes in the fair value recorded as a component of Capital market fees, net, and typically include interest rate-related instruments (swaps and caps).

33


Table of Contents

Free standing derivatives are entered into primarily for the benefit of commercial customers through providing derivative products which enables the customer to manage their exposures to interest rate risk. The Corporation’s market risk from unfavorable movements in interest rates related to these derivative contracts is generally economically hedged by concurrently entering into offsetting derivative contracts. The offsetting derivative contracts have identical notional values, terms and indices.

Mortgage derivatives

Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans are considered derivative instruments, and the fair value of these commitments is recorded on the consolidated balance sheets with the changes in fair value recorded as a component of mortgage banking, net.

Foreign currency derivatives

The Corporation provides foreign exchange services to customers. The Corporation may enter into a foreign currency forward to mitigate the exchange rate risk attached to the cash flows of a loan or as an offsetting contract to a forward entered into as a service to our customer.

Written and purchased option derivatives (time deposit)

The Corporation has periodically entered into written and purchased option derivative instruments to facilitate an equity linked time deposit product (the “Power CD”). During September 2013, the Corporation terminated its Power CD product. The Power CD was a time deposit that provided the purchaser a guaranteed return of principal at maturity plus a potential equity return (a written option), while the Corporation received a known stream of funds based on the equity return (a purchased option). The written and purchased options are mirror derivative instruments which are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 11: Balance Sheet Offsetting

Interest Rate-Related Instruments (“Interest Agreements”)

The Corporation enters into interest rate-related instruments to facilitate the interest rate risk management strategies of commercial customers. The Corporation mitigates this risk by entering into equal and offsetting interest rate-related instruments with highly rated third party financial institutions. The interest agreements are free-standing derivatives and are recorded at fair value in the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheet. The Corporation is party to master netting arrangements with its financial institution counterparties; however, the Corporation does not offset assets and liabilities under these arrangements for financial statement presentation purposes. The master netting arrangements provide for a single net settlement of all interest agreements, as well as collateral, in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract. Collateral, usually in the form of investment securities and cash, is posted by the counterparty with net liability positions in accordance with contract thresholds. See Note 10 for additional information on the Corporation’s derivative and hedging activities.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase (“Repurchase Agreements”)

The Corporation enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities. Under these arrangements, the Corporation may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Corporation to repurchase the assets. As a result, these repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing arrangements (i.e., secured borrowings) and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheet, while the securities underlying the repurchase agreements remain in the respective investment securities asset accounts (i.e., there is no offsetting or netting of the investment securities assets with the repurchase agreement liabilities). The right of setoff for a repurchase agreement resembles a secured borrowing, whereby the collateral would be used to settle the fair value of the repurchase agreement should the Corporation be in default (e.g., fails to make an interest payment to the counterparty). In addition, the Corporation does not enter into reverse repurchase agreements; therefore, there is no such offsetting to be done with the repurchase agreements.

34


Table of Contents

The following table presents the assets and liabilities subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The swap agreements we have with our commercial customers are not subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement, and therefore, are excluded from this table.

June 30, 2014 Gross amounts not offset
Gross Gross amounts Net amounts in the balance sheet
amounts offset in the presented in Financial
recognized balance sheet the balance sheet instruments Collateral Net amount
($ in Thousands)

Derivative assets:

Interest rate-related instruments

$ 519 $ $ 519 $ (519 ) $ $

Derivative liabilities:

Interest rate-related instruments

$ 41,197 $ $ 41,197 $ (519 ) $ (37,982 ) $ 2,696

December 31, 2013

Derivative assets:

Interest rate-related instruments

$ 3,084 $ $ 3,084 $ (3,082 ) $ $ 2

Derivative liabilities:

Interest rate-related instruments

$ 41,786 $ $ 41,786 $ (3,082 ) $ (33,405 ) $ 5,299

NOTE 12: Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, and Contingent Liabilities

The Corporation utilizes a variety of financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers and to manage its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include lending-related and other commitments (see below) and derivative instruments (see Note 10). During the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation reclassified certain letters of credit from commercial letters of credit to standby letters of credit. The letters of credit balances for December 31, 2013, have also been adjusted to reflect this change in classification. The following is a summary of lending-related commitments.

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
($ in Thousands)

Commitments to extend credit, excluding commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale (1)(2)

$ 6,256,686 $ 6,367,771

Commercial letters of credit (1)

8,668 12,034

Standby letters of credit (3)

369,331 370,773

(1) These off-balance sheet financial instruments are exercisable at the market rate prevailing at the date the underlying transaction will be completed and, thus, are deemed to have no current fair value, or the fair value is based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements and is not material at June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.
(2) Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale are considered derivative instruments and are disclosed in Note 10.
(3) The Corporation has established a liability of $4 million at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, as an estimate of the fair value of these financial instruments.

Lending-related Commitments

As a financial services provider, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments to extend credit. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans made by the Corporation, with each customer’s creditworthiness evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Since a significant portion of commitments to extend credit are subject to specific restrictive loan covenants or may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. An allowance for unfunded

35


Table of Contents

commitments is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded commitments (including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit). For June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation had an allowance for unfunded commitments totaling $20 million and $22 million, respectively, included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 6 for additional information on the allowance for unfunded commitments.

Lending-related commitments include commitments to extend credit, commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to customers at predetermined interest rates, as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contracts. Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans are considered derivative instruments, and the fair value of these commitments is recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation’s derivative and hedging activity is further described in Note 10. Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce and typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and the third party, while standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party.

Other Commitments

The Corporation has principal investment commitments to provide capital-based financing to private and public companies through either direct investments in specific companies or through investment funds and partnerships. The timing of future cash requirements to fund such commitments is generally dependent on the investment cycle, whereby privately held companies are funded by private equity investors and ultimately sold, merged, or taken public through an initial offering, which can vary based on overall market conditions, as well as the nature and type of industry in which the companies operate. The Corporation also invests in low-income housing, small-business commercial real estate, new market tax credit projects, and historic tax credit projects to promote the revitalization of low-to-moderate-income neighborhoods throughout the local communities of its bank subsidiary. As a limited partner in these unconsolidated projects, the Corporation is allocated tax credits and deductions associated with the underlying projects. The aggregate carrying value of these investments at June 30, 2014 was $31 million, included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets, compared to $33 million at December 31, 2013. Related to these investments, the Corporation had remaining commitments to fund of $16 million at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Contingent Liabilities

The Corporation is party to various pending and threatened claims and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business activities, some of which involve claims for substantial amounts. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcomes, the Corporation believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding matters, including the matters described below, and with respect to such legal proceedings, intends to continue to defend itself vigorously. The Corporation will consider settlement of cases when, in management’s judgment, it is in the best interests of both the Corporation and its shareholders.

On at least a quarterly basis, the Corporation assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with all pending or threatened claims and litigation, utilizing the most recent information available. On a matter by matter basis, an accrual for loss is established for those matters which the Corporation believes it is probable that a loss may be incurred and that the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, each accrual is adjusted as appropriate to reflect any subsequent developments. Accordingly, management’s estimate will change from time to time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate. For matters where a loss is not probable, or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.

Resolution of legal claims is inherently unpredictable, and in many legal proceedings various factors exacerbate this inherent unpredictability, including where the damages sought are unsubstantiated or indeterminate, it is unclear whether a case brought as a class action will be allowed to proceed on that basis, discovery is not complete, the proceeding is not yet in its final stages, the matters present legal uncertainties, there are significant facts in dispute, there are a large number of parties (including where it is uncertain how liability, if any, will be shared among multiple defendants), or there is a wide range of potential results.

A lawsuit, R.J. ZAYED v. Associated Bank, N.A., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on January 29, 2013. The lawsuit relates to a Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Oxford Global Partners and related entities (“Oxford”) and individuals and was brought by the receiver for Oxford. Oxford was a depository customer of Associated Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”). The lawsuit claims that the Bank is liable for failing to uncover the Oxford Ponzi scheme, and specifically alleges the Bank aided and abetted (1) the fraudulent scheme; (2) a breach of fiduciary duty; (3) conversion; and (4) false representations and omissions. The lawsuit seeks unspecified

36


Table of Contents

consequential and punitive damages. The District Court granted the Bank’s motion to dismiss the complaint on September 30, 2013, and the plaintiff has appealed such dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. It is not possible for management to assess the probability of a material adverse outcome or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss at this time. A lawsuit by investors in the same Ponzi scheme, Herman Grad, et al v. Associated Bank, N.A., brought in Brown County, Wisconsin in October 2009 was dismissed by the circuit court, and the dismissal was affirmed by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals in June 2011 in an unpublished opinion.

A purported class action lawsuit, Wanda Boone v. Associated Banc-Corp, was filed on April 10, 2014 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The lawsuit claims that loan coordinators employed by the Bank were not compensated for all hours worked, including the payment of overtime, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and Wisconsin wage laws. The lawsuit seeks monetary damages and attorneys’ fees. The Corporation filed a motion to dismiss on June 5, 2014. On July 29, 2014, the parties entered into a Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Case which provided for the dismissal of the case with prejudice. As part of the resolution of this matter, the Corporation made an immaterial payment to the plaintiff.

Please see “Regulatory Matters” below for additional information.

The Corporation sells residential mortgage loans to investors in the normal course of business. Residential mortgage loans sold to others are predominantly conventional residential first lien mortgages originated under our usual underwriting procedures, and are most often sold on a nonrecourse basis, primarily to the government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”). The Corporation’s agreements to sell residential mortgage loans in the normal course of business usually require certain representations and warranties on the underlying loans sold, related to credit information, loan documentation, collateral, and insurability. Subsequent to being sold, if a material underwriting deficiency or documentation defect is discovered, the Corporation may be obligated to repurchase the loan or reimburse the GSEs for losses incurred (collectively, “make whole requests”). The make whole requests and any related risk of loss under the representations and warranties are largely driven by borrower performance.

As a result of make whole requests, the Corporation has repurchased loans with principal balances of $2 million and $3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively, and paid loss reimbursement claims of $424,000 and $3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively. The Corporation had a mortgage repurchase reserve for potential claims on loans previously sold of $3 million at June 30, 2014, compared to $6 million at December 31, 2013. Make whole requests during 2013 and the first six months of 2014 generally arose from loans sold during the period January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2014, which totaled $18.1 billion at the time of sale, and consisted primarily of loans sold to GSEs. As of June 30, 2014, approximately $7.6 billion of these sold loans remain outstanding.

The balance in the mortgage repurchase reserve at the balance sheet date reflects the estimated amount of potential loss the corporation could incur from repurchasing a loan, as well as loss reimbursements, indemnifications, and other settlement resolutions. The following summarizes the changes in the mortgage repurchase reserve.

For the Six
Months Ended For the Year Ended
June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
($ in Thousands)

Balance at beginning of period

$ 5,700 $ 3,300

Repurchase provision expense

(2,009 ) 5,909

Charge offs

(391 ) (3,509 )

Balance at end of period

$ 3,300 $ 5,700

The Corporation may also sell residential mortgage loans with limited recourse (limited in that the recourse period ends prior to the loan’s maturity, usually after certain time and / or loan paydown criteria have been met), whereby repurchase could be required if the loan had defined delinquency issues during the limited recourse periods. At June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, there were approximately $38 million and $56 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans sold with such recourse risk. There have been limited instances and immaterial historical losses on repurchases for recourse under the limited recourse criteria.

37


Table of Contents

The Corporation has a subordinate position to the FHLB in the credit risk on residential mortgage loans it sold to the FHLB in exchange for a monthly credit enhancement fee. The Corporation has not sold loans to the FHLB with such credit risk retention since February 2005. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were $206 million and $233 million, respectively, of such residential mortgage loans with credit risk recourse, upon which there have been negligible historical losses to the Corporation.

Regulatory Matters

The Bank entered into a Stipulation and Consent Order for a Civil Money Penalty with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) dated June 26, 2014, which provides for the payment by the Bank of a civil money penalty of $500,000. The civil money penalty, which was paid in June 2014, relates to BSA/AML deficiencies which were the subject of a Consent Order dated February 23, 2012. The Consent Order was subsequently terminated in March, 2014.

NOTE 13: Fair Value Measurements

Fair value represents the estimated price at which an orderly transaction to sell an asset or to transfer a liability would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions (i.e., an exit price concept). As there is no active market for many of the Corporation’s financial instruments, estimates are made using discounted cash flow or other valuation techniques. Inputs into the valuation methods are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties, and require significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Accordingly, the derived fair value estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Corporation could realize in a current market exchange. Assets and liabilities are categorized into three levels based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Corporation’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. Below is a brief description of each fair value level.

Level 1 inputs Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access.
Level 2 inputs Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
Level 3 inputs Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the Corporation’s more significant instruments measured on a recurring basis at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Investment securities available for sale : Where quoted prices are available in an active market, investment securities are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 investment securities primarily include U.S. Treasury, certain Federal agency, and exchange-traded debt and equity securities. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows, with consideration given to the nature of the quote and the relationship of recently evidenced market activity to the fair value estimate, and are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Examples of these investment securities include certain Federal agency securities, obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities), mortgage-related securities, asset-backed securities, and other debt securities. Lastly, in certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the estimated fair value, securities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 securities primarily include pooled trust preferred debt securities. To validate the fair value estimates, assumptions, and controls, the Corporation looks to transactions for similar instruments and utilizes independent pricing provided by third party vendors or brokers and relevant market indices. While none of these sources are solely indicative of fair value, they serve as directional indicators for the appropriateness of the Corporation’s fair value estimates. The Corporation has determined that the fair value measures of its investment securities are classified predominantly within Level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 5 for additional disclosure regarding the Corporation’s investment securities.

38


Table of Contents

Derivative financial instruments (interest rate-related instruments ): The Corporation uses interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. In addition, the Corporation offers customer interest rate-related instruments (swaps and caps) to service our customers’ needs, for which the Corporation simultaneously enters into offsetting derivative financial instruments (i.e., mirror interest rate-related instruments) with third parties to manage its interest rate risk associated with these financial instruments. The valuation of the Corporation’s derivative financial instruments is determined using discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative and, also includes a nonperformance / credit risk component (credit valuation adjustment). See Note 10 for additional disclosure regarding the Corporation’s derivative financial instruments.

The discounted cash flow analysis component in the fair value measurements reflects the contractual terms of the derivative financial instruments, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. More specifically, the fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments), with the variable cash payments (or receipts) based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. Likewise, the fair values of interest rate options (i.e., interest rate caps) are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates fall below (or rise above) the strike rate of the floors (or caps), with the variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the floor (or cap) based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.

The Corporation also incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative financial instruments for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Corporation has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees. In conjunction with the FASB’s fair value measurement guidance, the Corporation made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

While the Corporation has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative financial instruments fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. The Corporation has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative financial instruments. Therefore, the Corporation has determined that the fair value measures of its derivative financial instruments in their entirety are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative financial instruments (foreign currency exchange forwards ): The Corporation provides foreign currency exchange services to customers. In addition, the Corporation may enter into a foreign currency exchange forward to mitigate the exchange rate risk attached to the cash flows of a loan or as an offsetting contract to a forward entered into as a service to our customer. The valuation of the Corporation’s foreign currency exchange forwards is determined using quoted prices of foreign currency exchange forwards with similar characteristics, with consideration given to the nature of the quote and the relationship of recently evidenced market activity to the fair value estimate, and are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 10 for additional disclosures regarding the corporation’s foreign currency exchange forwards.

Derivative financial instruments (mortgage derivatives) : Mortgage derivatives include interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale to individual customers and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to various investors. The Corporation relies on an internal valuation model to estimate the fair value of its interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, which includes grouping the interest rate lock commitments by interest rate and terms, applying an estimated pull-through rate based on historical experience, and then multiplying by quoted investor prices determined to be reasonably applicable to the loan commitment groups based on interest rate, terms, and rate lock expiration dates of the loan commitment groups.

The Corporation also relies on an internal valuation model to estimate the fair value of its forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans (i.e., an estimate of what the Corporation would receive or pay to terminate the forward delivery contract based on market prices for similar financial instruments), which includes matching specific terms and maturities of the forward commitments against applicable investor pricing available. While there are Level 2 and 3 inputs used in the valuation models, the Corporation has determined that the majority of the inputs significant in the valuation of both of the mortgage derivatives fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 10 for additional disclosure regarding the Corporation’s mortgage derivatives.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the Corporation’s more significant instruments measured on a nonrecurring basis at the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

39


Table of Contents

Loans Held for Sale: Loans held for sale, which consist generally of current production of certain fixed-rate, first-lien residential mortgage loans, are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The estimated fair value was based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics, which the Corporation classifies as a Level 2 nonrecurring fair value measurement.

Impaired Loans: The Corporation considers a loan impaired when it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the note agreement, including both principal and interest. Management has determined that commercial and consumer loan relationships that have nonaccrual status or have had their terms restructured in a troubled debt restructuring meet this impaired loan definition. For individually evaluated impaired loans, the amount of impairment is based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans, or the estimated liquidity of the note. See Note 6 for additional information regarding the Corporation’s impaired loans.

Mortgage servicing rights : Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of mortgage servicing rights do occur, the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available to allow for a “quoted price for similar assets” comparison. Accordingly, the Corporation utilizes an independent valuation from a third party which uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights. The valuation model incorporates prepayment assumptions to project mortgage servicing rights cash flows based on the current interest rate scenario, which is then discounted to estimate an expected fair value of the mortgage servicing rights. The valuation model considers portfolio characteristics of the underlying mortgages, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, discount rate assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenue, costs to service, and other economic factors. The Corporation periodically reviews and assesses the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the model. In addition, the Corporation compares its fair value estimates and assumptions to observable market data for mortgage servicing rights, where available, and to recent market activity and actual portfolio experience. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Corporation uses the amortization method (i.e., lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value measured on a nonrecurring basis), not fair value measurement accounting, for its mortgage servicing rights assets. See Note 7 for additional disclosure regarding the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights.

The table below presents the Corporation’s investment securities available for sale and derivative financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Fair Value Measurements Using
June 30, 2014 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
($ in Thousands)

Assets:

Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury securities

$ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ $

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

654,040 654,040

Residential mortgage-related securities:

Government-sponsored enterprise (GSE)

3,881,921 3,881,921

Private-label

2,614 2,614

GNMA commercial mortgage-related securities

940,342 940,342

Asset-backed securities

19,395 19,395

Other securities (debt and equity)

7,067 3,867 3,000 200

Total investment securities available for sale

$ 5,506,379 $ 4,867 $ 5,501,312 $ 200

Derivatives (trading and other assets)

$ 51,035 $ $ 48,985 $ 2,050

Liabilities:

Derivatives (trading and other liabilities)

$ 53,324 $ $ 51,666 $ 1,658

40


Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurements Using
December 31, 2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
($ in Thousands)

Assets:

Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury securities

$ 1,002 $ 1,002 $ $

Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)

676,080 676,080

Residential mortgage-related securities:

Government-sponsored enterprise (GSE)

3,838,430 3,838,430

Private-label

3,014 3,014

GNMA commercial mortgage-related securities

647,477 647,477

Asset-backed securities

23,059 23,059

Other securities (debt and equity)

61,523 3,238 57,986 299

Total investment securities available for sale

$ 5,250,585 $ 4,240 $ 5,246,046 $ 299

Derivatives (trading and other assets)

$ 52,773 $ $ 51,056 $ 1,717

Liabilities:

Derivatives (trading and other liabilities)

$ 53,798 $ $ 53,798 $

The table below presents a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2014, for financial instruments measured on a recurring basis and classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Investment Securities
Available for Sale
Derivative Financial
Instruments
($ in Thousands)

Balance December 31, 2012

$ 480 $ 7,647

Total net losses included in income:

Mortgage derivative loss

(5,930 )

Total net losses included in other comprehensive income:

Unrealized investment securities loss

(70 )

Sales of investment securities

(111 )

Balance December 31, 2013

$ 299 $ 1,717

Total net losses included in income:

Mortgage derivative loss

(1,325 )

Sales of investment securities

(99 )

Balance June 30, 2014

$ 200 $ 392

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2014, the Corporation utilized the following valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs.

Investment securities available for sale – other securities (debt and equity): In valuing the investment securities available for sale classified within Level 3, the Corporation utilized a discounted cash flow model and incorporated its own assumptions about future cash flows and discount rates adjusting for credit and liquidity factors. The Corporation also reviewed the underlying collateral and other relevant data in developing the assumptions for these investment securities.

Derivative financial instruments (mortgage derivative – interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale) : The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s mortgage derivative interest rate lock commitments (“IRLC”) is the closing ratio, which represents the percentage of loans currently in a lock position which management estimates will ultimately close. Typically the higher the closing ratio on the IRLC’s will result in an increase in the fair

41


Table of Contents

value if in a gain position or a decrease in fair value if in a loss position. The closing ratio calculation takes into consideration historical data and loan-level data, (particularly the change in the current interest rates from the time of initial rate lock). The closing ratio is periodically reviewed for reasonableness and reported to the Mortgage Risk Management Committee. At June 30, 2014, the closing ratio was 86%.

Impaired loans : For individually evaluated impaired loans, the amount of impairment is based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans, or the estimated liquidity of the note, resulting in average discounts of 20% to 30%.

Mortgage servicing rights : The discounted cash flow analyses that generate expected market prices utilize the observable characteristics of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio, as well as certain unobservable valuation parameters. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights are the weighted average constant prepayment rate and weighted average discount rate, which were 14.5% and 10.1% at June 30, 2014, respectively. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Although the prepayment rate and discount rate are not directly interrelated, they will generally move in opposite directions.

These parameter assumptions fall within a range that the Corporation, in consultation with an independent third party, believes purchasers of servicing would apply to such portfolios sold into the current secondary servicing market. Discussions are held with members from Treasury and Consumer Banking to reconcile the fair value estimates and the key assumptions used by the respective parties in arriving at those estimates. The Associated Mortgage Group Risk Committee is responsible for providing control over the valuation methodology and key assumptions. To assess the reasonableness of the fair value measurement, the Corporation also compares the fair value and constant prepayment rate to a value calculated by an independent third party on an annual basis.

The table below presents the Corporation’s loans held for sale, impaired loans, and mortgage servicing rights measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Fair Value Measurements Using
June 30, 2014 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
($ in Thousands)

Assets:

Loans held for sale

$ 79,744 $ $ 79,744 $

Impaired loans (1)

84,747 84,747

Mortgage servicing rights

67,699 67,699

Fair Value Measurements Using
December 31, 2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
($ in Thousands)

Assets:

Loans held for sale

$ 64,738 $ $ 64,738 $

Impaired loans (1)

88,049 88,049

Mortgage servicing rights

74,444 74,444

(1) Represents individually evaluated impaired loans, net of the related allowance for loan losses.

Certain nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include other real estate owned (upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment), nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test, and intangible assets and other nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.

42


Table of Contents

During the first half of 2014 and the full year 2013, certain other real estate owned, upon initial recognition, was re-measured and reported at fair value through a charge off to the allowance for loan losses based upon the estimated fair value of the other real estate owned, less estimated selling costs. The fair value of other real estate owned, upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment, was estimated using appraised values, which the Corporation classifies as a Level 2 nonrecurring fair value measurement. Other real estate owned measured at fair value upon initial recognition totaled approximately $13 million for the first half of 2014 and $29 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. In addition to other real estate owned measured at fair value upon initial recognition, the Corporation also recorded write-downs to the balance of other real estate owned for subsequent impairment of $1 million and $4 million to asset losses, net for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

The Corporation is required to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Corporation’s financial instruments.

The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, were as follows.

June 30, 2014
Carrying Fair Value Measurements Using
Amount Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
($ in Thousands)

Financial assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 549,883 $ 549,883 $ 549,883 $ $

Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions

78,233 78,233 78,233

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

18,135 18,135 18,135

Investment securities held to maturity

246,050 249,229 249,229

Investment securities available for sale

5,506,379 5,506,379 4,867 5,501,312 200

FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank stocks

186,247 186,247 186,247

Loans held for sale

78,657 78,657 78,657

Loans, net

16,773,201 16,825,491 16,825,491

Bank owned life insurance

570,323 570,323 570,323

Accrued interest receivable

67,925 67,925 67,925

Interest rate-related instruments

39,839 39,839 39,839

Foreign currency exchange forwards

791 791 791

Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale

2,050 2,050 2,050

Purchased options (time deposit)

8,355 8,355 8,355

Financial liabilities:

Noninterest-bearing demand, savings, interest-bearing demand, and money market deposits

$ 15,754,100 $ 15,754,100 $ $ $ 15,754,100

Brokered CDs and other time deposits

1,562,159 1,562,721 1,562,721

Short-term funding

2,337,171 2,337,171 2,337,171

Long-term funding

2,931,809 2,925,691 2,925,691

Accrued interest payable

7,114 7,114 7,114

Interest rate-related instruments

42,683 42,683 42,683

Foreign currency exchange forwards

628 628 628

Standby letters of credit (1)

3,709 3,709 3,709

Forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans

1,658 1,658 1,658

Written options (time deposit)

8,355 8,355 8,355

43


Table of Contents
December 31, 2013
Carrying Fair Value Measurements Using
Amount Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
($ in Thousands)

Financial assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 455,482 $ 455,482 $ 455,482 $ $

Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions

126,018 126,018 126,018

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

20,745 20,745 20,745

Investment securities held to maturity

175,210 169,889 169,889

Investment securities available for sale

5,250,585 5,250,585 4,240 5,246,046 299

FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank stocks

181,249 181,249 181,249

Loans held for sale

64,738 64,738 64,738

Loans, net

15,627,946 15,599,094 15,599,094

Bank owned life insurance

568,413 568,413 568,413

Accrued interest receivable

66,308 66,308 66,308

Interest rate-related instruments

42,980 42,980 42,980

Foreign currency exchange forwards

748 748 748

Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale

416 416 416

Forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans

1,301 1,301 1,301

Purchased options (time deposit)

7,328 7,328 7,328

Financial liabilities:

Noninterest-bearing demand, savings, interest-bearing demand, and money market deposits

$ 15,581,971 $ 15,581,971 $ $ $ 15,581,971

Brokered CDs and other time deposits

1,685,196 1,687,198 1,687,198

Short-term funding

740,926 740,926 740,926

Long-term funding

3,087,267 3,085,893 3,085,893

Accrued interest payable

7,994 7,994 7,994

Interest rate-related instruments

45,815 45,815 45,815

Foreign currency exchange forwards

655 655 655

Standby letters of credit (1)

3,754 3,754 3,754

Written options (time deposit)

7,328 7,328 7,328

(1) The commitment on standby letters of credit was $369 million and $371 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. See Note 12 for additional information on the standby letters of credit and for information on the fair value of lending-related commitments.

Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, and accrued interest receivable— For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment securities (held to maturity and available for sale)— The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted prices in active markets, or if quoted prices are not available for a specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows.

FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank stocks – The carrying amount is a reasonable fair value estimate for the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stocks given their “restricted” nature (i.e., the stock can only be sold back to the respective institutions (Federal Home Loan Bank or Federal Reserve Bank) or another member institution at par).

Loans held for sale – The fair value estimation process for the loans held for sale portfolio is segregated by loan type. The estimated fair value was based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics.

44


Table of Contents

Loans, net— The fair value estimation process for the loan portfolio uses an exit price concept and reflects discounts the Corporation believes are consistent with liquidity discounts in the market place. Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial and industrial, real estate construction, commercial real estate (owner occupied and investor), lease financing, residential mortgage, home equity, other installment, and credit cards. The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for similar maturities. The fair value analysis also included other assumptions to estimate fair value, intended to approximate those a market participant would use in an orderly transaction, with adjustments for discount rates, interest rates, liquidity, and credit spreads, as appropriate.

Bank owned life insurance – The fair value of bank owned life insurance approximates the carrying amount, because upon liquidation of these investments, the Corporation would receive the cash surrender value which equals the carrying amount.

Deposits— The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, interest-bearing demand deposits, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of the balance sheet date. The fair value of Brokered CDs and other time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. However, if the estimated fair value of Brokered CDs and other time deposits is less than the carrying value, the carrying value is reported as the fair value.

Accrued interest payable and short-term funding— For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Long-term funding— Rates currently available to the Corporation for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of existing long-term funding.

Interest rate-related instruments— The fair value of interest rate-related instruments is determined using discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. The Corporation also incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.

Foreign currency exchange forwards – The fair value of the Corporation’s foreign currency exchange forwards is determined using quoted prices of foreign currency exchange forwards with similar characteristics, with consideration given to the nature of the quote and the relationship of recently evidenced market activity to the fair value estimate.

Standby letters of credit— The fair value of standby letters of credit represent deferred fees arising from the related off-balance sheet financial instruments. These deferred fees approximate the fair value of these instruments and are based on several factors, including the remaining terms of the agreement and the credit standing of the customer.

Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale— The Corporation relies on an internal valuation model to estimate the fair value of its interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, which includes grouping the interest rate lock commitments by interest rate and terms, applying an estimated pull-through rate based on historical experience, and then multiplying by quoted investor prices determined to be reasonably applicable to the loan commitment groups based on interest rate, terms, and rate lock expiration dates of the loan commitment groups.

Forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans— The Corporation relies on an internal valuation model to estimate the fair value of its forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans (i.e., an estimate of what the Corporation would receive or pay to terminate the forward delivery contract based on market prices for similar financial instruments), which includes matching specific terms and maturities of the forward commitments against applicable investor pricing available.

Purchased and written options— The fair value of the Corporation’s purchased and written options is determined using quoted prices of the underlying stocks.

Limitations— Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Corporation’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Corporation’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

45


Table of Contents

NOTE 14: Retirement Plans

The Corporation has a noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan (the Retirement Account Plan (“RAP”)) covering substantially all full-time employees. The benefits are based primarily on years of service and the employee’s compensation paid. Employees of acquired entities generally participate in the RAP after consummation of the business combinations. Any retirement plans of acquired entities are typically merged into the RAP after completion of the mergers, and credit is usually given to employees for years of service at the acquired institution for vesting and eligibility purposes. In connection with the First Federal acquisition in October 2004, the Corporation assumed the First Federal pension plan (the “First Federal Plan”). The First Federal Plan was frozen on December 31, 2004 and qualified participants in the First Federal Plan became eligible to participate in the RAP as of January 1, 2005. Additional discussion and information on the RAP and the First Federal Plan are collectively referred to below as the “Pension Plan”.

The Corporation also provides healthcare access for eligible retired employees in its Postretirement Plan (the “Postretirement Plan”). Retirees who are at least 55 years of age with 5 years of service are eligible to participate in the Postretirement Plan. The Corporation has no plan assets attributable to the Postretirement Plan. The Corporation reserves the right to terminate or make changes to the Postretirement Plan at any time.

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the Pension and Postretirement Plans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and for the full year 2013 were as follows.

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
Year Ended
December 31,
2014 2013 2014 2013 2013
($ in Thousands)

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

Pension Plan:

Service cost

$ 2,975 $ 2,975 $ 5,950 $ 5,950 $ 12,078

Interest cost

1,790 1,548 3,580 3,095 6,237

Expected return on plan assets

(4,855 ) (4,305 ) (9,710 ) (8,610 ) (17,647 )

Amortization of prior service cost

15 17 30 35 72

Amortization of actuarial loss

325 1,073 650 2,145 4,344

Total net periodic benefit cost

$ 250 $ 1,308 $ 500 $ 2,615 $ 5,084

Postretirement Plan:

Interest cost

$ 39 $ 40 $ 78 $ 80 $ 142

Amortization of actuarial gain

(9 ) (18 )

Total net periodic benefit cost

$ 30 $ 40 $ 60 $ 80 $ 142

The Corporation’s funding policy is to pay at least the minimum amount required by the funding requirements of federal law and regulations, with consideration given to the maximum funding amounts allowed. The Corporation regularly reviews the funding of its Pension Plan.

NOTE 15: Segment Reporting

The Corporation utilizes a risk-based internal profitability measurement system to provide strategic business unit reporting. The profitability measurement system is based on internal management methodologies designed to produce consistent results and reflect the underlying economics of the units. Certain strategic business units have been combined for segment information reporting purposes where the nature of the products and services, the type of customer and the distribution of those products and services are similar. The three reportable segments are Corporate and Commercial Banking, Community and Consumer Banking, and Risk Management and Shared Services, with no segment representing more than half of the assets, liabilities or Tier 1 common equity of the Corporation as a whole.

46


Table of Contents

The financial information of the Corporation’s segments has been compiled utilizing the accounting policies described in the Corporation’s 2013 annual report on Form 10-K with certain exceptions. The more significant of these exceptions are described herein. The Corporation allocates interest income or interest expense using a funds transfer pricing methodology that charges users of funds (assets) interest expense and credits providers of funds (liabilities, primarily deposits) with income based on the maturity, prepayment and / or repricing characteristics of the assets and liabilities. The net effect of this allocation is recorded in the Risk Management and Shared Services segment. A credit provision is allocated to segments based on the expected long-term annual net charge off rates attributable to the credit risk of loans managed by the segment during the period. In contrast, the level of the consolidated provision for credit losses is determined using the methodologies described in the Corporation’s 2013 annual report on Form 10-K to assess the overall appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses. The net effect of the credit provision is recorded in Risk Management and Shared Services. Indirect expenses incurred by certain centralized support areas are allocated to segments based on actual usage (for example, volume measurements) and other criteria. Certain types of administrative expense and bank-wide expense accruals (including amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets associated with acquisitions) are generally not allocated to segments. Income taxes are allocated to segments based on the Corporation’s estimated effective tax rate, with certain segments adjusted for any tax-exempt income or non-deductible expenses. Equity is allocated to the segments based on regulatory capital requirements and in proportion to an assessment of the inherent risks associated with the business of the segment (including interest, credit and operating risk).

The management accounting policies and processes utilized in compiling segment financial information are highly subjective and, unlike financial accounting, are not based on authoritative guidance similar to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, reported segments and the financial information of the reported segments are not necessarily comparable with similar information reported by other financial institutions. Furthermore, changes in management structure or allocation methodologies and procedures may result in changes in previously reported segment financial data. During 2014, certain organization and methodology changes were made and, accordingly, 2013 results have been restated and presented on a comparable basis.

A description of each business segment is presented below.

Corporate and Commercial Banking – The Corporate and Commercial Banking segment serves a wide range of customers including, businesses, developers, non-profits, municipalities, and financial institutions. Customers in this segment typically include companies with annual sales over $10 million and delivery of services is provided through our corporate and commercial units, our commercial real estate unit, as well as our specialized industries and commercial financial services area. The financial solutions provided to our customers include but are not limited to: (1) Lending solutions, such as commercial loans and lines of credit, business credit cards, commercial real estate financing, construction loans, letters of credit, leasing, and asset based lending. For our larger clients we also offer syndicated loans to meet their lending needs; (2) Deposit and cash management solutions such as business checking and interest-bearing deposit products, cash vault and night depository services, liquidity solutions, payables and receivables solutions; and information services; and (3) Specialized financial services such as insurance and benefits related products and services, risk management, and international banking solutions. In serving the commercial banking segment we compete based on an in-depth understanding of our customers’ financial needs, the ability to match market competitive solutions to those needs, and the highest standards of relationship and service excellence in the delivery of these services.

Community and Consumer Banking – The Community and Consumer Banking segment serves individuals and small businesses (typically entities with less than $10 million in annual sales) through our various Consumer Banking, Community Banking, and Private Client offices, and provides companies of varying sizes with fiduciary services such as administration of pension, profit-sharing and other employee benefit plans, fiduciary and corporate agency services, and institutional asset management. The services provided to our individual, small business, and community banking customers include but are not limited to: (1) Transactional solutions such as checking, credit, debit and pre-paid cards, online banking and bill pay, and money transfer services; (2) Lending solutions such as residential mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit, personal and installment loans, commercial real estate financing, business loans, and business lines of credit; and (3) Investable funds solutions such as savings, money market deposit accounts, IRA accounts, certificates of deposit, fixed and variable annuities, full-service, discount and on-line investment brokerage; as well as trust and investment management accounts. In serving the consumer banking segment we compete based on providing a broad range of solutions to meet the needs of our customers in their entire financial lifecycle, convenient access to our services through multiple channels such as branches, phone based services, online and mobile banking, and a relationship based business model which assists our customers in navigating any changes and challenges in their financial circumstances.

47


Table of Contents

Risk Management and Shared Services – The Risk Management and Shared Services segment includes Corporate Risk Management, Credit Administration, Finance, Treasury, Operations and Technology, which are key shared functions. The segment also includes Parent Company activity, intersegment eliminations and residual revenue and expenses, representing the difference between actual amounts incurred and the amounts allocated to operating segments, including interest rate risk residuals (funds transfer pricing mismatches) and credit risk and provision residuals (long term credit charge mismatches). The earning assets within this segment include the Corporation’s investment portfolio and capital includes both allocated as well as any remaining unallocated capital.

Information about the Corporation’s segments is presented below.

Segment Income Statement Data

($ in Thousands) Corporate and
Commercial
Banking
Community and
Consumer
Banking
Risk Management
and Shared Services
Consolidated
Total

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

Net interest income

$ 147,343 $ 144,924 $ 41,409 $ 333,676

Noninterest income

49,872 87,897 7,999 145,768

Total revenue

197,215 232,821 49,408 479,444

Credit provision *

25,947 9,760 (25,707 ) 10,000

Noninterest expense

98,828 199,405 37,350 335,583

Income before income taxes

72,440 23,656 37,765 133,861

Income tax expense

24,840 8,279 9,178 42,297

Net income

$ 47,600 $ 15,377 $ 28,587 $ 91,564

Return on average allocated capital (ROT1CE) **

12.0 % 6.3 % 8.7 % 9.5 %

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

Net interest income

$ 156,506 $ 158,752 $ 2,577 $ 317,835

Noninterest income

47,260 109,643 9,407 166,310

Total revenue

203,766 268,395 11,984 484,145

Credit provision *

27,196 10,452 (29,048 ) 8,600

Noninterest expense

91,354 210,610 34,347 336,311

Income before income taxes

85,216 47,333 6,685 139,234

Income tax expense (benefit)

29,826 16,567 (2,435 ) 43,958

Net income

$ 55,390 $ 30,766 $ 9,120 $ 95,276

Return on average allocated capital (ROT1CE) **

14.6 % 11.4 % 2.4 % 10.0 %

Segment Balance Sheet Data

($ in Thousands) Corporate and
Commercial
Banking
Community and
Consumer
Banking
Risk Management
and Shared Services
Consolidated
Total

Average Balances for YTD 2Q 2014

Average earning assets

$ 9,020,912 $ 7,308,806 $ 5,887,073 $ 22,216,791

Average loans

9,010,272 7,308,806 87,756 16,406,834

Average deposits

5,147,717 9,636,263 2,298,077 17,082,057

Average allocated capital (T1CE) **

$ 796,717 $ 492,002 $ 606,910 $ 1,895,629

Average Balances for YTD 2Q 2013

Average earning assets

$ 8,335,894 $ 7,258,455 $ 5,222,479 $ 20,816,828

Average loans

8,325,992 7,258,455 4,305 15,588,752

Average deposits

5,290,239 9,634,922 2,200,456 17,125,617

Average allocated capital (T1CE) **

$ 765,432 $ 544,457 $ 558,807 $ 1,868,696

* The consolidated credit provision is equal to the actual reported provision for credit losses.
** ROT1CE reflects return on average allocated Tier 1 common equity (“T1CE”). The ROT1CE for the Risk Management and Shared Services segment and the Consolidated Total is inclusive of the annualized effect of the preferred stock dividends.

48


Table of Contents

Segment Income Statement Data

($ in Thousands) Corporate and
Commercial
Banking
Community and
Consumer
Banking
Risk Management
and Shared Services
Consolidated
Total

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014

Net interest income

$ 73,801 $ 72,926 $ 21,976 $ 168,703

Noninterest income

25,722 44,365 2,160 72,247

Total revenue

99,523 117,291 24,136 240,950

Credit provision *

12,915 4,813 (12,728 ) 5,000

Noninterest expense

52,035 99,517 16,373 167,925

Income before income taxes

34,573 12,961 20,491 68,025

Income tax expense

11,586 4,537 5,537 21,660

Net income

$ 22,987 $ 8,424 $ 14,954 $ 46,365

Return on average allocated capital (ROT1CE) **

11.4 % 6.8 % 9.3 % 9.6 %

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013

Net interest income

$ 79,327 $ 79,559 $ 1,296 $ 160,182

Noninterest income

24,061 55,479 4,770 84,310

Total revenue

103,388 135,038 6,066 244,492

Credit provision *

14,983 5,980 (15,663 ) 5,300

Noninterest expense

44,923 107,883 15,890 168,696

Income before income taxes

43,482 21,175 5,839 70,496

Income tax expense (benefit)

15,219 7,411 (22 ) 22,608

Net income

$ 28,263 $ 13,764 $ 5,861 $ 47,888

Return on average allocated capital (ROT1CE) **

14.6 % 10.1 % 3.3 % 9.9 %

Segment Balance Sheet Data

($ in Thousands) Corporate and
Commercial
Banking
Community and
Consumer
Banking
Risk Management
and Shared Services
Consolidated
Total

Average Balances for 2Q 2014

Average earning assets

$ 9,188,973 $ 7,386,355 $ 5,962,187 $ 22,537,515

Average loans

9,175,637 7,386,355 84,397 16,646,389

Average deposits

5,055,431 9,731,580 2,385,821 17,172,832

Average allocated capital (T1CE) **

$ 806,137 $ 495,476 $ 590,153 $ 1,891,766

Average Balances for 2Q 2013

Average earning assets

$ 8,513,663 $ 7,218,796 $ 5,218,785 $ 20,951,244

Average loans

8,504,175 7,218,796 4,836 15,727,807

Average deposits

5,206,773 9,671,089 2,227,216 17,105,078

Average allocated capital (T1CE) **

$ 776,991 $ 545,301 $ 558,534 $ 1,880,826

* The consolidated credit provision is equal to the actual reported provision for credit losses.
** ROT1CE reflects return on average allocated Tier 1 common equity (“T1CE”). The ROT1CE for the Risk Management and Shared Services segment and the Consolidated Total is inclusive of the annualized effect of the preferred stock dividends.

49


Table of Contents

Note 16: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table summarizes the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at June 30, 2014 and 2013, changes during the six and three month periods then ended, and reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income during the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for the investment securities available for sale are included in investment securities gains, net on the consolidated statements of income, while the amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for the defined benefit pension and post retirement obligations are a component of personnel expense on the consolidated statements of income.

($ in Thousands) Investments
Securities
Available
For Sale
Defined Benefit
Pension and
Post Retirement
Obligations
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Balance January 1, 2014

$ (11,396 ) $ (12,848 ) $ (24,244 )

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

56,184 56,184

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

(412 ) 662 250

Income tax expense

(21,441 ) (255 ) (21,696 )

Net other comprehensive income during period

34,331 407 34,738

Balance June 30, 2014

$ 22,935 $ (12,441 ) $ 10,494

Balance January 1, 2013

$ 86,109 $ (37,506 ) $ 48,603

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

(121,760 ) (121,760 )

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

(334 ) 2,180 1,846

Income tax (expense) benefit

47,138 (842 ) 46,296

Net other comprehensive income (loss) during period

(74,956 ) 1,338 (73,618 )

Balance June 30, 2013

$ 11,153 $ (36,168 ) $ (25,015 )

Investments
Securities
Available
For Sale
Defined Benefit
Pension and
Post Retirement
Obligations
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Balance April 1, 2014

$ 1,067 $ (12,644 ) $ (11,577 )

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

35,557 35,557

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

(34 ) 331 297

Income tax expense

(13,655 ) (128 ) (13,783 )

Net other comprehensive income during period

21,868 203 22,071

Balance June 30, 2014

$ 22,935 $ (12,441 ) $ 10,494

Balance April 1, 2013

$ 79,828 $ (36,837 ) $ 42,991

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

(111,829 ) (111,829 )

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

(34 ) 1,090 1,056

Income tax (expense) benefit

43,188 (421 ) 42,767

Net other comprehensive income (loss) during period

(68,675 ) 669 (68,006 )

Balance June 30, 2013

$ 11,153 $ (36,168 ) $ (25,015 )

50


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains statements that may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements other than historical facts contained or incorporated by reference into this report. These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” or “anticipates,” references to estimates or similar expressions. Future filings by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and future statements other than historical facts contained in written material, press releases and oral statements issued by, or on behalf of the Corporation may also constitute forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements contained in this report or which may be contained in future statements made for or on behalf of the Corporation are based upon information available at the time the statement is made and the Corporation assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by federal securities law. Forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and the Corporation’s actual results may differ materially from the expected results discussed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause actual results to differ from the results discussed in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the risk factors in Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and as may be described from time to time in the Corporation’s subsequent SEC filings.

Overview

The following discussion and analysis is presented to assist in the understanding and evaluation of the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. It is intended to complement the unaudited consolidated financial statements, footnotes, and supplemental financial data appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction therewith.

Critical Accounting Policies

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the determination of the allowance for credit losses, goodwill impairment assessment, mortgage servicing rights valuation, and income taxes.

The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates. This preparation requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, actual results could differ from the estimates, assumptions, and judgments reflected in the financial statements. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Management believes the following policies are both important to the portrayal of the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations and require subjective or complex judgments and, therefore, management considers the following to be critical accounting policies. The critical accounting policies are discussed directly with the Audit Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

Allowance for Credit Losses: Management’s evaluation process used to determine the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses (which includes the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded commitments) is subject to the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments. The evaluation process combines many factors: management’s ongoing review and grading of the loan portfolio, consideration of historical loan loss and delinquency experience, trends in past due and nonaccrual loans, risk characteristics of the various classifications of loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic conditions, the fair value of underlying collateral, and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect probable credit losses. Because current economic conditions can change and future events are inherently difficult to predict, the anticipated amount of estimated loan losses, and therefore the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses, could change significantly. As an integral part of their examination process, various regulatory agencies also review the allowance for credit losses. Such agencies may require additions to the allowances for credit losses or may require that certain loan balances be charged off or downgraded into criticized loan categories

51


Table of Contents

when their credit evaluations differ from those of management, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. The Corporation believes the level of the allowance for credit losses is appropriate as recorded in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 6, “Loans, Allowance for Credit Losses, and Credit Quality,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements and section “Allowance for Credit Losses.”

Goodwill Impairment Assessment: Goodwill is not amortized but, instead, is subject to impairment tests on at least an annual basis, and more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The impairment testing process is conducted by assigning net assets and goodwill to each reporting unit. An initial qualitative evaluation is made to assess the likelihood of impairment and determine whether further quantitative testing to calculate the fair value is necessary. When the qualitative evaluation indicates that impairment is more likely than not, quantitative testing is required whereby the fair value of each reporting unit is calculated and compared to the recorded book value, “step one”. If the calculated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and “step two” is not considered necessary. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its calculated fair value, the impairment test continues (“step two”) by comparing the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value is computed by adjusting all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to current fair value with the offset adjustment to goodwill. The adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value of the goodwill. An impairment charge is recognized if the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill.

The Corporation conducted its annual impairment testing in May 2014, utilizing the qualitative assessment. Factors that management considered in this assessment included macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, overall financial performance of the Corporation and each reporting unit (both current and projected), changes in management strategy, and changes in the composition or carrying amount of net assets. In addition, management considered the increases in both the Corporation’s common stock price and in the overall bank common stock index (based on the NASDAQ bank index), as well as the Corporation’s earnings per common share trend over the past year. Based on these assessments, management concluded that the 2014 annual qualitative impairment assessment indicated that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value exceeded the carrying value (including goodwill) for each reporting unit. Therefore, a step one quantitative analysis was not required. There were no impairment charges recorded in 2013 or through June 30, 2014. See also Note 7, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Mortgage Servicing Rights Valuation: The fair value of the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights asset is important to the presentation of the consolidated financial statements since the mortgage servicing rights are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value. Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active open market with readily observable prices. As such, like other participants in the mortgage banking business, the Corporation relies on an independent valuation from a third party which uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights. The use of a discounted cash flow model involves judgment, particularly of estimated prepayment speeds of underlying mortgages serviced and the overall level of interest rates. Loan type and note interest rate are the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans used to stratify capitalized mortgage servicing rights for purposes of measuring impairment. The Corporation periodically reviews the assumptions underlying the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. While the Corporation believes that the values produced by the discounted cash flow model are indicative of the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights portfolio, these values can change significantly depending upon key factors, such as the then current interest rate environment, estimated prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgages serviced, and other economic conditions. The proceeds that might be received should the Corporation actually consider a sale of some or all of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio could differ from the amounts reported at any point in time.

Mortgage servicing rights are carried at the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value and are assessed for impairment at each reporting date. Impairment is assessed based on the fair value at each reporting date using estimated prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgage loans serviced and stratifications based on the risk characteristics of the underlying loans (predominantly loan type and note interest rate). As mortgage interest rates fall, prepayment speeds are usually faster and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally decreases, requiring additional valuation reserve. Conversely, as mortgage interest rates rise, prepayment speeds are usually slower and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally increases, requiring less valuation reserve. However, the extent to which interest rates impact the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset depends, in part, on the magnitude of the changes in market interest rates and the differential between the then current market interest rates for mortgage loans and the mortgage interest rates included in the mortgage servicing portfolio. Management recognizes that the volatility in the valuation of the mortgage servicing rights asset will continue. To better understand the sensitivity of the impact of prepayment speeds and refinance rates on the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset at June 30, 2014 (holding all other factors unchanged), if refinance interest rates were to decrease 50 bp, the estimated value of the mortgage servicing rights asset would have been

52


Table of Contents

approximately $9 million (or 14%) lower. Conversely, if refinance interest rates were to increase 50 bp, the estimated value of the mortgage servicing rights asset would have been approximately $8 million (or 12%) higher. However, the Corporation’s potential recovery recognition due to valuation improvement is limited to the balance of the mortgage servicing rights valuation reserve, which was $1 million at June 30, 2014. The Corporation believes the mortgage servicing rights asset is properly recorded in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 7, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” and Note 13, “Fair Value Measurements,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements and section “Noninterest Income.”

Income Taxes: The assessment of tax assets and liabilities involves the use of estimates, assumptions, interpretations, and judgment concerning certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes. There can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or positions of federal and state taxing authorities, will not differ from management’s current assessment, the impact of which could be significant to the consolidated results of operations and reported earnings. Quarterly assessments are performed to determine if valuation allowances are necessary. Assessing the need for, or sufficiency of, a valuation allowance requires management to evaluate all available evidence, both positive and negative, including the recent trend of quarterly earnings. Positive evidence necessary to overcome the negative evidence includes whether future taxable income in sufficient amounts and character within the carryback and carryforward periods is available under the tax law, including the use of tax planning strategies. When negative evidence (e.g., cumulative losses in recent years, history of operating loss or tax credit carryforwards expiring unused) exists, more positive evidence than negative evidence will be necessary. The Corporation has concluded that based on the level of positive evidence, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized. However, there is no guarantee that the tax benefits associated with the deferred tax assets will be fully realized. The Corporation believes the tax assets and liabilities are properly recorded in the consolidated financial statements. See also Note 9, “Income Taxes,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements and section “Income Taxes.”

Segment Review

As discussed in Note 15, “Segment Reporting,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements, the Corporation’s reportable segments have been determined based upon its internal profitability measurement system, which is organized by strategic business unit. Certain strategic business units have been combined for segment information reporting purposes where the nature of the products and services, the type of customer, and the distribution of those products and services are similar. The reportable segments are Corporate and Commercial Banking, Community and Consumer Banking and Risk Management and Shared Services.

The financial information of the Corporation’s segments was compiled utilizing the accounting policies described in Note 15, “Segment Reporting,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements. The management accounting policies and processes utilized in compiling segment financial information are highly subjective and, unlike financial accounting, are not based on authoritative guidance similar to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, reported segments and the financial information of the reported segments are not necessarily comparable with similar information reported by other financial institutions. Furthermore, changes in management structure or allocation methodologies and procedures may result in changes in previously reported segment financial data. During 2014, certain organization and methodology changes were made and, accordingly, 2013 results have been restated and presented on a comparable basis.

Year to Date Segment Review

The Corporate and Commercial Banking segment consists of lending and deposit solutions to businesses, developers, non-profits, municipalities, and financial institutions, and the support to deliver, fund, and manage such banking solutions. The Corporate and Commercial Banking segment had net income of $48 million for the first half of 2014, down $7 million compared to $55 million for the comparable period in 2013. Segment revenue decreased $7 million to $197 million for the first half of 2014 compared to $204 million for the first half of 2013 primarily due to lower spreads on loan and deposit products. The credit provision decreased $1 million to $26 million during the first half of 2014 due to improvement in the loan credit quality. Average loan balances were $9.0 billion for the first half of 2014, up $684 million from the first half of 2013, while average deposit balances were $5.1 billion for the first half of 2014, down $143 million from the first half of 2013. Average allocated capital increased $31 million to $797 million for the first half of 2014 reflecting the increase in the segment’s loan balances.

The Community and Consumer Banking segment consists of lending and deposit solutions to individuals and small businesses and also provides a variety of investment and fiduciary products and services. The Community and Consumer Banking segment had net income of $15 million for the first half of 2014, down $16 million compared to $31 million in the first half of 2013. Earnings decreased as segment revenue declined $36 million to $233 million for the first half of 2014, primarily due to lower mortgage banking income as refinancing activity has drastically slowed and lower net interest income due to lower deposit spreads. The credit provision

53


Table of Contents

was level at $10 million for the first half of 2014 and 2013. Total noninterest expense decreased $11 million to $199 million for the first half of 2014, primarily due to a reduction in full time equivalent employees. Average loan balances were level at $7.3 billion for both the first half of 2014 and 2013. Average deposits were level at $9.6 billion for both the first half of 2014 and 2013. Average allocated capital decreased $52 million to $492 million for the first half of 2014.

The Risk Management and Shared Services segment had net income of $29 million in the first half of 2014, up $20 million compared to $9 million for the comparable period in 2013. The increase was due to a $37 million increase in total revenue primarily due to changes in the long-term funding rates utilized in the funds transfer pricing methodology for allocating interest credits to the Commercial and Consumer segments. Average earning asset balances were $5.9 billion for the first half of 2014, up $665 million from an average balance of $5.2 billion for the comparable period in 2013.

Comparable Quarter Segment Review

The Corporate and Commercial Banking segment had net income of $23 million for the second quarter of 2014, down $5 million compared to $28 million for the comparable quarter in 2013. Segment revenue decreased $3 million to $100 million for the second quarter of 2014 compared to $103 million for the second quarter of 2013 primarily due to lower spreads on loan and deposit products. The credit provision decreased $2 million to $13 million for the second quarter of 2014 due to improvement in the loan credit quality. Average loan balances were $9.2 billion for the second quarter of 2014, up $671 million compared to the second quarter of 2013, while average deposit balances were $5.1 billion for the second quarter of 2014, down $151 million from the second quarter of 2013. Average allocated capital increased $29 million to $806 million for the second quarter of 2014 reflecting the increase in the segment’s loan balances.

The Community and Consumer Banking segment had net income of $8 million for the second quarter of 2014, down $6 million compared to $14 million for the second quarter of 2013. Segment revenue decreased $18 million to $117 million for the second quarter of 2014, primarily due to lower mortgage banking income as refinancing activity has drastically slowed and lower net interest income due to lower deposit spreads. The credit provision decreased $1 million to $5 million for the second quarter of 2014. Total noninterest expense was down $8 million to $100 million for the second quarter, primarily due to a reduction in full time equivalent employees. Average loan balances increased $168 million to $7.4 billion for second quarter of 2014 compared to $7.2 billion for the second quarter of 2013. Average deposits were $9.7 billion for the second quarter of 2014, up $60 million from the second quarter of 2013. Average allocated capital decreased $50 million to $495 million for the second quarter of 2014.

The Risk Management and Shared Services segment had net income of $15 million for the second quarter of 2014, up $9 million compared to $6 million for the comparable quarter in 2013. The primary component of the increase was an $18 million increase in total revenue primarily due to changes in the long-term funding rates utilized in the funds transfer pricing methodology for allocating net interest income credits to the Commercial and Consumer segments. Average earning asset balances were $6.0 billion for the second quarter of 2014, up $743 million from an average balance of $5.2 billion for the comparable quarter in 2013.

Results of Operations – Summary

The Corporation recorded net income of $92 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to net income of $95 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Net income available to common equity was $89 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, or net income of $0.55 for both basic and diluted earnings per common share. Comparatively, net income available to common equity for the six months ended June 30, 2013, was $93 million, or net income of $0.55 for both basic and diluted earnings per common share. The net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was 3.10% compared to 3.17% for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

54


Table of Contents

TABLE 1

Summary Results of Operations: Trends

($ in Thousands, except per share data)

2nd Qtr 1st Qtr 4th Qtr 3rd Qtr 2nd Qtr
2014 2014 2013 2013 2013

Net income (Quarter)

$ 46,365 $ 45,199 $ 47,758 $ 45,658 $ 47,888

Net income (Year-to-date)

91,564 45,199 188,692 140,934 95,276

Net income available to common equity (Quarter)

$ 45,087 $ 43,955 $ 46,485 $ 44,373 $ 46,588

Net income available to common equity (Year-to-date)

89,042 43,955 183,534 137,049 92,676

Earnings per common share – basic (Quarter)

$ 0.28 $ 0.27 $ 0.28 $ 0.27 $ 0.28

Earnings per common share – basic (Year-to-date)

0.55 0.27 1.10 0.82 0.55

Earnings per common share – diluted (Quarter)

$ 0.28 $ 0.27 $ 0.28 $ 0.27 $ 0.28

Earnings per common share – diluted (Year-to-date)

0.55 0.27 1.10 0.82 0.55

Return on average assets (Quarter)

0.75 % 0.76 % 0.80 % 0.78 % 0.82 %

Return on average assets (Year-to-date)

0.75 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.83

Return on average equity (Quarter)

6.43 % 6.35 % 6.60 % 6.33 % 6.58 %

Return on average equity (Year-to-date)

6.39 6.35 6.52 6.50 6.59

Return on average tangible common equity (Quarter)

9.56 % 9.45 % 9.87 % 9.48 % 9.76 %

Return on average tangible common equity (Year-to-date)

9.51 9.45 9.73 9.68 9.78

Return on average Tier 1 common equity (Quarter) (1)

9.56 % 9.38 % 9.78 % 9.31 % 9.94 %

Return on average Tier 1 common equity (Year-to-date) (1)

9.47 9.38 9.77 9.77 10.00

Efficiency ratio (Quarter) (2)

69.70 % 70.41 % 73.70 % 71.45 % 69.01 %

Efficiency ratio (Year-to-date) (2)

70.05 70.41 71.04 70.14 69.51

Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (Quarter) (2)

68.23 % 68.86 % 72.59 % 70.10 % 67.21 %

Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (Year-to-date) (2)

68.54 68.86 69.56 68.53 67.79

Net interest margin (Quarter)

3.08 % 3.12 % 3.23 % 3.13 % 3.16 %

Net interest margin (Year-to-date)

3.10 3.12 3.17 3.15 3.17

(1) Return on average Tier 1 common equity = Net income available to common equity divided by average Tier 1 capital excluding qualifying perpetual preferred stock and qualifying trust preferred securities. This is a non-GAAP financial measure.
(2) See Table 1A for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure.

55


Table of Contents

TABLE 1A

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measure

2nd Qtr 1st Qtr 4th Qtr 3rd Qtr 2nd Qtr
2014 2014 2013 2013 2013

Efficiency ratio (Quarter) (a)

69.70 % 70.41 % 73.70 % 71.45 % 69.01 %

Taxable equivalent adjustment (Quarter)

(1.32 ) (1.35 ) (1.49 ) (1.50 ) (1.38 )

Asset gains (losses), net (Quarter)

0.26 0.22 0.80 0.59 (0.01 )

Other intangible amortization (Quarter)

(0.41 ) (0.42 ) (0.42 ) (0.44 ) (0.41 )

Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (Quarter) (b)

68.23 % 68.86 % 72.59 % 70.10 % 67.21 %

Efficiency ratio (Year-to-date) (a)

70.05 % 70.41 % 71.04 % 70.14 % 69.51 %

Taxable equivalent adjustment (Year-to-date)

(1.34 ) (1.35 ) (1.45 ) (1.45 ) (1.42 )

Asset gains, net (Year-to-date)

0.24 0.22 0.39 0.27 0.11

Other intangible amortization (Year-to-date)

(0.41 ) (0.42 ) (0.42 ) (0.43 ) (0.41 )

Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (Year-to-date) (b)

68.54 % 68.86 % 69.56 % 68.53 % 67.79 %

(a) Efficiency ratio is defined by the Federal Reserve guidance as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding investment securities gains / losses, net.
(b) Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent, is noninterest expense, excluding other intangible amortization, divided by the sum of taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding investment securities gains / losses, net and asset gains / losses, net. This efficiency ratio is presented on a taxable equivalent basis, which adjusts net interest income for the tax-favored status of certain loans and investment securities. Management believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income as it enhances the comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources and it excludes certain specific revenue items (such as investment securities gains / losses, net and asset gains / losses, net).

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis for the six months ended June 30, 2014, was $343 million, an increase of $15 million (5%) versus the first six months of 2013. The increase in taxable equivalent net interest income was attributable to favorable volume variance (as balance sheet changes in both volume and mix increased taxable equivalent net interest income by $14 million), and favorable rate variances (as the impact of changes in the interest rate environment and product pricing increased taxable equivalent net interest income by $1 million).

The net interest margin for the first half of 2014 was 3.10%, 7 bp lower than 3.17% for the same period in 2013. This comparable period decrease was comprised of a 5 bp lower contribution from net free funds and a 2 bp decrease in interest rate spread (the net of a 15 bp decrease in yield on earning assets and a 13 bp decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities).

The Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged during 2013 and the first six months of 2014. The Federal Reserve affirmed that it is unlikely that the short-term interest rates will increase until 2015. For the second half of 2014, the Corporation expects continued gradual net interest margin compression, while growing net interest income.

The yield on earning assets was 3.34% for the first half of 2014, 15 bp lower than the comparable period last year. Loan yields were down 22 bp, (to 3.58%), due to the repricing of adjustable rate loans and competitive pricing pressures in a low interest rate environment. The yield on investment securities and other short-term investments increased 7 bp (to 2.65%), and was also impacted by the low interest rate environment and slowing prepayment speeds of mortgage-related securities purchased at a premium.

The rate on interest-bearing liabilities of 0.30% for the first half of 2014 was 13 bp lower than the same period in 2013. Rates on interest-bearing deposits were down 6 bp (to 0.19%), reflecting the low interest rate environment and a reduction of higher cost deposit products. The cost of short and long-term funding decreased 58 bp (to 0.63%) with the cost of short-term funding relatively unchanged (down 2 bp to 0.14%), while long-term funding decreased 286 bp (to 0.85%) mainly due to favorable rates on FHLB advances.

56


Table of Contents

Average earning assets were $22.2 billion for the first half of 2014, an increase of $1.4 billion (7%) from the comparable period last year. Average loans increased $818 million, including increases in commercial loans (up $843 million) and residential mortgage loans (up $360 million), while retail loans decreased (down $385 million). Average investment securities and other short-term investments increased $582 million, primarily in mortgage-related securities.

Average interest-bearing liabilities of $17.3 billion for the first half of 2014 increased $1.5 billion (9%) from the comparable period last year. On average, short and long-term funding increased $1.5 billion between the comparable six month periods, attributable to a $2.1 billion increase in long-term funding partially offset by a $647 million decrease in short-term funding. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $26 million, while noninterest bearing deposits decreased $69 million.

57


Table of Contents

TABLE 2

Net Interest Income Analysis

($ in Thousands)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Interest Average Interest Average
Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/
Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate

Earning assets:

Loans: (1)(2)(3)

Commercial and business lending

$ 6,300,948 $ 105,199 3.37 % $ 5,738,404 $ 104,325 3.66 %

Commercial real estate lending

3,937,772 71,900 3.68 3,657,667 71,668 3.95

Total commercial

10,238,720 177,099 3.49 9,396,071 175,993 3.77

Residential mortgage

4,002,592 66,239 3.31 3,642,207 60,595 3.33

Retail

2,165,522 48,570 4.51 2,550,474 57,672 4.55

Total loans

16,406,834 291,908 3.58 15,588,752 294,260 3.80

Investment securities (1)

5,528,604 73,788 2.67 4,904,764 65,058 2.65

Other short-term investments

281,353 3,311 2.36 323,312 2,480 1.54

Investments and other

5,809,957 77,099 2.65 5,228,076 67,538 2.58

Total earning assets

22,216,791 369,007 3.34 20,816,828 361,798 3.49

Other assets, net

2,320,633 2,356,375

Total assets

$ 24,537,424 $ 23,173,203

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Interest-bearing deposits:

Savings deposits

$ 1,231,516 $ 462 0.08 % $ 1,175,053 $ 444 0.08 %

Interest-bearing demand deposits

2,845,618 1,792 0.13 2,823,969 2,369 0.17

Money market deposits

7,257,137 5,752 0.16 6,987,134 6,854 0.20

Time deposits

1,628,235 4,348 0.54 1,950,631 6,643 0.69

Total interest-bearing deposits

12,962,506 12,354 0.19 12,936,787 16,310 0.25

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

826,589 611 0.15 728,238 743 0.21

Other short-term funding

581,799 396 0.14 1,326,792 857 0.13

Total short-term funding

1,408,388 1,007 0.14 2,055,030 1,600 0.16

Long-term funding

2,968,038 12,657 0.85 862,627 15,967 3.71

Total short and long-term funding

4,376,426 13,664 0.63 2,917,657 17,567 1.21

Total interest-bearing liabilities

17,338,932 26,018 0.30 15,854,444 33,877 0.43

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

4,119,551 4,188,830

Other liabilities

188,992 212,662

Stockholders’ equity

2,889,949 2,917,267

Total liabilities and equity

$ 24,537,424 $ 23,173,203

Interest rate spread

3.04 % 3.06 %

Net free funds

0.06 0.11

Net interest income, taxable

equivalent, and net interest margin

$ 342,989 3.10 % $ 327,921 3.17 %

Taxable equivalent adjustment

9,313 10,086

Net interest income

$ 333,676 $ 317,835

(1) The yield on tax exempt loans and securities is computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35% for all periods presented and is net of the effects of certain disallowed interest deductions.
(2) Nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale have been included in the average balances.
(3) Interest income includes net loan fees.

58


Table of Contents

TABLE 2

Net Interest Income Analysis

($ in Thousands)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Interest Average Interest Average
Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/
Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate

Earning assets:

Loans: (1)(2)(3)

Commercial and business lending

$ 6,468,844 $ 53,519 3.32 % $ 5,860,416 $ 53,613 3.67 %

Commercial real estate lending

3,967,848 36,309 3.67 3,722,108 35,804 3.86

Total commercial

10,436,692 89,828 3.45 9,582,524 89,417 3.74

Residential mortgage

4,077,617 33,575 3.29 3,661,742 30,113 3.29

Retail

2,132,080 24,157 4.54 2,483,541 28,291 4.56

Total loans

16,646,389 147,560 3.55 15,727,807 147,821 3.77

Investment securities (1)

5,606,279 36,865 2.63 4,917,671 32,302 2.63

Other short-term investments

284,847 1,862 2.62 305,766 1,233 1.61

Investments and other

5,891,126 38,727 2.63 5,223,437 33,535 2.57

Total earning assets

22,537,515 186,287 3.31 20,951,244 181,356 3.47

Other assets, net

2,320,557 2,354,976

Total assets

$ 24,858,072 $ 23,306,220

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Interest-bearing deposits:

Savings deposits

$ 1,267,297 $ 242 0.08 % $ 1,207,959 236 0.08 %

Interest-bearing demand deposits

2,894,446 969 0.13 2,867,524 1,190 0.17

Money market deposits

7,340,244 2,928 0.16 6,930,554 3,239 0.19

Time deposits

1,597,535 2,056 0.52 1,907,337 3,104 0.65

Total interest-bearing deposits

13,099,522 6,195 0.19 12,913,374 7,769 0.24

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

847,756 306 0.14 677,489 333 0.20

Other short-term funding

832,299 280 0.13 1,631,644 525 0.13

Total short-term funding

1,680,055 586 0.14 2,309,133 858 0.15

Long-term funding

2,931,957 6,146 0.84 765,514 7,551 3.95

Total short and long-term funding

4,612,012 6,732 0.58 3,074,647 8,409 1.09

Total interest-bearing liabilities

17,711,534 12,927 0.29 15,988,021 16,178 0.41

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

4,073,310 4,191,704

Other liabilities

182,110 205,501

Stockholders’ equity

2,891,118 2,920,994

Total liabilities and equity

$ 24,858,072 $ 23,306,220

Interest rate spread

3.02 % 3.06 %

Net free funds

0.06 0.10

Net interest income, taxable

equivalent, and net interest margin

$ 173,360 3.08 % $ 165,178 3.16 %

Taxable equivalent adjustment

4,657 4,996

Net interest income

$ 168,703 $ 160,182

(1) The yield on tax exempt loans and securities is computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35% for all periods presented and is net of the effects of certain disallowed interest deductions.
(2) Nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale have been included in the average balances.
(3) Interest income includes net loan fees.

59


Table of Contents

Provision for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses (which includes the provision for loan losses and the provision for unfunded commitments) for the first six months of 2014 was $10 million, compared to $9 million for the first six months of 2013 and $10 million for the full year of 2013. Net charge offs were $8 million for the first six months of 2014, compared to $28 million for the first six months of 2013 and $39 million for the full year of 2013. Annualized net charge offs as a percent of average loans for the first six months of 2014 were 0.10%, compared to 0.36% for the first six months of 2013 and 0.25% for the full year of 2013. At June 30, 2014, the allowance for credit losses (which includes the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded commitments) was $292 million, compared to $300 million at June 30, 2013 and $290 million at December 31, 2013. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans at June 30, 2014, was 1.59%, compared to 1.76% at June 30, 2013 and 1.69% at December 31, 2013. Nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2014 were $179 million, compared to $217 million at June 30, 2013, and $185 million at December 31, 2013. See Tables 7 and 8.

The provision for credit losses is predominantly a function of the Corporation’s reserving methodology and judgments as to other qualitative and quantitative factors used to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses (which includes the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded commitments). This reserving methodology focuses on changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, changes in levels of impaired and other nonaccrual loans, historical losses and delinquencies on each portfolio category, the level of loans sold or transferred to held for sale, the risk inherent in specific loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic conditions, the fair value of underlying collateral, and other factors which could affect potential credit losses. See additional discussion under sections “Allowance for Credit Losses,” and “Nonaccrual Loans, Potential Problem Loans, and Other Real Estate Owned.”

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income for the first half of 2014 was $146 million, down $21 million (12%) from the first half of 2013, primarily due to declines in net mortgage banking income as refinancing activity has drastically slowed. For the second half of 2014, the Corporation expects noninterest income to be in line with the first half of 2014.

TABLE 3

Noninterest Income

($ in Thousands)

2nd Qtr 2nd Qtr Dollar Percent YTD YTD Dollar Percent
2014 2013 Change Change 2014 2013 Change Change

Trust service fees

$ 12,017 $ 11,405 $ 612 5.4 % $ 23,728 $ 22,315 $ 1,413 6.3 %

Service charges on deposit accounts

17,412 17,443 (31 ) (0.2 ) 33,812 34,272 (460 ) (1.3 )

Card-based and other nondeposit fees

12,577 12,591 (14 ) (0.1 ) 25,086 24,541 545 2.2

Insurance commissions

13,651 9,631 4,020 41.7 25,968 21,394 4,574 21.4

Brokerage and annuity commissions

4,520 3,688 832 22.6 8,553 7,204 1,349 18.7

Core fee-based revenue

60,177 54,758 5,419 9.9 117,147 109,726 7,421 6.8

Mortgage banking income

8,457 15,399 (6,942 ) (45.1 ) 17,387 32,937 (15,550 ) (47.2 )

Mortgage servicing rights expense

3,095 (3,864 ) 6,959 (180.1 ) 5,664 (4,091 ) 9,755 (238.5 )

Mortgage banking, net

5,362 19,263 (13,901 ) (72.2 ) 11,723 37,028 (25,305 ) (68.3 )

Capital market fees, net

2,099 5,074 (2,975 ) (58.6 ) 4,421 7,657 (3,236 ) (42.3 )

Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) income

3,011 3,281 (270 ) (8.2 ) 7,331 6,251 1,080 17.3

Other

665 1,944 (1,279 ) (65.8 ) 3,107 4,522 (1,415 ) (31.3 )

Subtotal

71,314 84,320 (13,006 ) (15.4 ) 143,729 165,184 (21,455 ) (13.0 )

Asset gains (losses), net

899 (44 ) 943 N/M 1,627 792 835 105.4

Investment securities gains, net

34 34 412 334 78 23.4

Total noninterest income

$ 72,247 $ 84,310 $ (12,063 ) (14.3 )% $ 145,768 $ 166,310 $ (20,542 ) (12.4 )%

N/M—Not meaningful.

60


Table of Contents

Core fee-based revenue was $117 million, an increase of $7 million (7%) versus the first half of 2013. Trust service fees were $24 million for the first half of 2014, up $1 million (6%) from the first half of 2013. The market value of assets under management at June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $7.7 billion and $6.9 billion, respectively. Insurance commissions were $26 million, up $5 million (21%) from the first half of 2013, primarily due to a $3 million reserve established in 2013 related to third party insurance products sold in prior years. Brokerage and annuity commissions were up $1 million (19%) between the comparable six month periods of 2014 and 2013, primarily due to increased brokerage sales. All remaining core-fee based revenue categories on a combined basis were relatively unchanged.

Net mortgage banking income was $12 million for the first half of 2014 and $37 million for the first half of 2013. Net mortgage banking consists of gross mortgage banking income less mortgage servicing rights expense. Gross mortgage banking income includes servicing fees, the gain or loss on sales of mortgage loans to the secondary market, changes to the mortgage loan repurchase reserve, and the fair value adjustments on the mortgage derivatives. Gross mortgage banking income decreased $16 million compared to the first half of 2013, due to lower gains on sales (down $13 million) and a $9 million reduction in the fair value of the mortgage derivatives, partially offset by a $6 million favorable change in the mortgage loan repurchase reserve provision. See Note 12 “Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contingent Liabilities,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning the mortgage loan repurchase reserve. Secondary mortgage production was $479 million for the first half of 2014 and $1.5 billion for the first half of 2013.

Mortgage servicing rights expense includes both the amortization of the mortgage servicing rights asset and changes to the valuation allowance associated with the mortgage servicing rights asset. Mortgage servicing rights expense is affected by the size of the servicing portfolio, as well as the changes in the estimated fair value of the mortgage servicing rights asset. Mortgage servicing rights expense was $10 million higher than the comparable six-month period in 2013, with a $13 million lower recovery of the valuation reserve, partially offset by a $3 million reduction in amortization due to slower prepayments. Mortgage servicing rights are considered a critical accounting policy given that estimating their fair value involves a discounted cash flow model and assumptions that involve judgment, particularly of estimated prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgages serviced and the overall level of interest rates. See section “Critical Accounting Policies,” as well as Note 7 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” and Note 13, “Fair Value Measurements,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure.

Net capital market fees decreased $3 million primarily due to the change in the credit risk of interest-rate related derivative instruments. Bank owned life insurance income was $7 million, up $1 million from the first half of 2013 primarily due to death benefits received during the first half of 2014. All remaining noninterest income categories on a combined basis were $5 million, down 9% from the comparable six month period last year.

61


Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense was $336 million for the first half of 2014, relatively unchanged (down 0.2%) from the comparable period in 2013. For 2014, the Corporation expects flat year over year noninterest expense with continued focus on efficiency initiatives.

TABLE 4

Noninterest Expense

($ in Thousands)

2nd Qtr 2nd Qtr Dollar Percent YTD YTD Dollar Percent
2014 2013 Change Change 2014 2013 Change Change

Personnel expense

$ 97,793 $ 99,791 $ (1,998 ) (2.0 )% $ 195,491 $ 197,698 $ (2,207 ) (1.1 )%

Occupancy

13,785 14,305 (520 ) (3.6 ) 29,345 29,967 (622 ) (2.1 )

Equipment

6,227 6,462 (235 ) (3.6 ) 12,503 12,629 (126 ) (1.0 )

Technology

14,594 12,651 1,943 15.4 27,318 24,159 3,159 13.1

Business development and advertising

5,077 5,028 49 1.0 10,139 9,565 574 6.0

Other intangible asset amortization

991 1,011 (20 ) (2.0 ) 1,982 2,022 (40 ) (2.0 )

Loan expense

3,620 3,044 576 18.9 6,407 6,328 79 1.2

Legal and professional fees

4,436 5,483 (1,047 ) (19.1 ) 8,624 10,828 (2,204 ) (20.4 )

Losses other than loans

381 499 (118 ) (23.6 ) 925 883 42 4.8

Foreclosure / OREO expense

1,575 2,302 (727 ) (31.6 ) 3,471 4,724 (1,253 ) (26.5 )

FDIC expense

4,945 4,395 550 12.5 9,946 9,827 119 1.2

Other

14,501 13,725 776 5.7 29,432 27,681 1,751 6.3

Total noninterest expense

$ 167,925 $ 168,696 $ (771 ) (0.5 )% $ 335,583 $ 336,311 $ (728 ) (0.2 )%

Personnel expense (which includes salary-related expenses and fringe benefit expenses) was $195 million for the first half of 2014, down $2 million (1%) from the first half of 2013. Average full-time equivalent employees were 4,474 for the first half of 2014, down 7% from 4,816 for the first half of 2013. Salary-related expenses increased $3 million (2%). This increase was primarily the result of higher compensation and performance based incentives. Fringe benefit expenses were down $5 million (14%) versus the first half of 2013, primarily due to a decrease in health insurance costs.

Nonpersonnel noninterest expenses on a combined basis were $140 million, up $1 million (1%) from the first half of 2013. Technology was up $3 million (13%), as we continue to invest in solutions that will drive operational efficiency. Legal and professional fees for the first half of 2014 were $9 million, down $2 million (20%) from the first half of 2013 due to a decrease in consultant costs. All remaining noninterest expense categories on a combined basis were relatively unchanged (up 0.5%) compared to the first half of 2013.

Income Taxes

The Corporation recognized income tax expense of $42 million for the first half of 2014, compared to income tax expense of $44 million for the first half of 2013. The effective tax rate was 31.60% for the first half of 2014, compared to an effective tax rate of 31.57% for the first half of 2013.

Income tax expense recorded in the consolidated statements of income involves the interpretation and application of certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes, and is, therefore, considered a critical accounting policy. Examination by taxing authorities may impact the amount of tax expense and / or reserve for uncertain tax positions if their interpretations differ from those of management, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations. See Note 9, “Income Taxes,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements and section “Critical Accounting Policies.”

62


Table of Contents

Balance Sheet

At June 30, 2014, total assets were $25.7 billion, up $1.5 billion (6%) from December 31, 2013. Loans of $17.0 billion at June 30, 2014 were up $1.1 billion (7%) from December 31, 2013, with increases in commercial loans of $901 million and residential mortgage loans of $297 million, partially offset by continued run off in home equity and installment balances of $50 million. On June 30, 2014, the Corporation purchased a 45% participation interest in the outstanding loan balances (totaling $99 million) of the Associated Bank branded credit card portfolio from Elan / US Bank for $108 million. The purchase premium will be amortized over 5 years and the Corporation will continue to participate on a pro-rata basis with Elan / US Bank in all revenues, credit losses, and outstanding loan balances going forward. See section “Credit Risk” for a detailed discussion of the changes in the loan portfolio and the related credit risk management for each loan type. Investment securities were $5.8 billion at June 30, 2014, an increase of $327 million (6%) from year-end 2013.

At June 30, 2014, total deposits of $17.3 billion were relatively unchanged from December 31, 2013 (up less than 1%). Short and long-term funding increased $1.4 billion (38%) since year-end 2013, including an increase of $1.6 billion in short-term funding (primarily short-term FHLB advances to fund loan growth as deposits were relatively unchanged), partially offset by a decrease of $155 million in long-term funding due to the early retirement of $155 million of senior notes in February 2014.

Since June 30, 2013, loans increased $1.3 billion (8%), with commercial loans up $935 million and residential mortgage loans up $601 million, offset by a $238 million decline in home equity and installment loan balances. Deposits increased $184 million (1%) since June 30, 2013, primarily in money market accounts. Short and long-term funding increased $1.9 billion, including a $2.3 billion increase in long-term funding as the Corporation took advantage of favorable interest rates on five year, putable, variable rate FHLB advances, partially offset by a $427 million reduction in short-term funding.

TABLE 5

Period End Loan Composition

($ in Thousands)

June 30, 2014 March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 September 30, 2013 June 30, 2013
% of % of % of % of % of
Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total

Commercial and industrial

$ 5,616,205 33 % $ 5,222,141 32 % $ 4,822,680 31 % $ 4,703,056 30 % $ 4,752,838 30 %

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

1,070,463 7 1,098,089 7 1,114,715 7 1,147,352 8 1,174,866 8

Lease financing

51,873 52,500 55,483 51,727 55,084

Commercial and business lending

6,738,541 40 6,372,730 39 5,992,878 38 5,902,135 38 5,982,788 38

Commercial real estate—investor

2,990,732 17 3,001,219 18 2,939,456 18 2,847,152 18 3,010,992 19

Real estate construction

1,000,421 6 969,617 6 896,248 6 834,744 5 800,569 5

Commercial real estate lending

3,991,153 23 3,970,836 24 3,835,704 24 3,681,896 23 3,811,561 24

Total commercial

10,729,694 63 10,343,566 63 9,828,582 62 9,584,031 61 9,794,349 62

Home equity revolving lines of credit

866,042 5 856,679 5 874,840 5 875,703 6 888,162 6

Home equity loans first liens

659,598 4 705,835 4 742,120 5 794,912 5 863,779 5

Home equity loans junior liens

187,732 1 199,488 1 208,054 1 220,763 1 234,292 2

Home equity

1,713,372 10 1,762,002 10 1,825,014 11 1,891,378 12 1,986,233 13

Installment and credit cards

469,203 3 393,321 3 407,074 3 420,268 3 434,029 3

Residential mortgage

4,132,783 24 3,942,555 24 3,835,591 24 3,690,177 24 3,531,988 22

Total consumer

6,315,358 37 6,097,878 37 6,067,679 38 6,001,823 39 5,952,250 38

Total loans

$ 17,045,052 100 % $ 16,441,444 100 % $ 15,896,261 100 % $ 15,585,854 100 % $ 15,746,599 100 %

Farmland

$ 8,475 % $ 8,286 % $ 8,591 % $ 14,278 1 % $ 14,867 1 %

Multi-family

951,698 32 965,568 32 951,348 33 896,819 31 965,373 32

Non-owner occupied

2,030,559 68 2,027,365 68 1,979,517 67 1,936,055 68 2,030,752 67

Commercial real estate—investor

$ 2,990,732 100 % $ 3,001,219 100 % $ 2,939,456 100 % $ 2,847,152 100 % $ 3,010,992 100 %

1-4 family construction

$ 293,361 29 % $ 273,470 28 % $ 259,031 29 % $ 248,294 30 % $ 238,336 30 %

All other construction

707,060 71 696,147 72 637,217 71 586,450 70 562,233 70

Real estate construction

$ 1,000,421 100 % $ 969,617 100 % $ 896,248 100 % $ 834,744 100 % $ 800,569 100 %

63


Table of Contents

Credit Risk

Total loans were $17.0 billion at June 30, 2014, an increase of $1.1 billion or 7% from December 31, 2013. Commercial and business loans were $6.7 billion, up $746 million (12%) from December 31, 2013, to represent 40% of total loans at June 30, 2014. Commercial real estate totaled $4.0 billion at June 30, 2014 and represented 23% of total loans, an increase of $155 million (4%) from December 31, 2013. Consumer loans were $6.3 billion, up $248 million (4%) from December 31, 2013, and represented 37% of total loans at June 30, 2014.

The Corporation has long-term guidelines relative to the proportion of Commercial and Business, Commercial Real Estate, and Consumer loans within the overall loan portfolio, with each targeted to represent 30-40% of the overall loan portfolio. The targeted long-term guidelines were unchanged during 2013 and the first six months of 2014. Furthermore, certain sub-asset classes within the respective portfolios were further defined and dollar limitations were placed on these sub-portfolios. These guidelines and limits are reviewed quarterly and approved annually by the Enterprise Risk Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors. These guidelines and limits are designed to create balance and diversification within the loan portfolios.

The commercial and business lending portfolio, which consists of commercial and business loans and owner occupied commercial real estate loans, was $6.7 billion at June 30, 2014, up $746 million (12%) since year-end 2013. The commercial and business lending classification primarily includes commercial loans to large corporations, middle market companies and small businesses. At June 30, 2014, the largest industry groups within the commercial and business loan category included the manufacturing sector which represented 9% of total loans and 22% of the total commercial and business loan portfolio. The next largest industry group within the commercial and business loan category was the wholesale trade sector, which represented 4% of total loans and 11% of the total commercial and business loan portfolio at June 30, 2014. The remaining portfolio is spread over a diverse range of industries, none of which exceeds 5% of total loans. The credit risk related to commercial loans is largely influenced by general economic conditions and the resulting impact on a borrower’s operations or on the value of underlying collateral, if any.

The commercial real estate lending portfolio, which consists of investor commercial real estate and construction loans, totaled $4.0 billion at June 30, 2014, up $155 million (4%) from December 31, 2013. Within the commercial real estate lending portfolio, commercial real estate lending to investors totaled $3.0 billion at June 30, 2014, an increase of $51 million (2%) from December 31, 2013. Commercial real estate primarily includes commercial-based loans to investors that are secured by commercial income properties or multi-family projects. Commercial real estate loans are typically intermediate to long-term financings. Loans of this type are mainly secured by commercial income properties or multi-family projects. Credit risk is managed in a similar manner to commercial and business loans by employing sound underwriting guidelines, lending primarily to borrowers in local markets and businesses, periodically evaluating the underlying collateral, and formally reviewing the borrower’s financial soundness and relationship on an ongoing basis. Real estate construction loans were $1.0 billion, an increase of $104 million (12%) compared to December 31, 2013. Loans in this classification are primarily short-term or interim loans that provide financing for the acquisition or development of commercial income properties, multi-family projects or residential development, both single family and condominium. Real estate construction loans are made to developers and project managers who are generally well known to the Corporation, and have prior successful project experience. The credit risk associated with real estate construction loans is generally confined to specific geographic areas but is also influenced by general economic conditions. The Corporation controls the credit risk on these types of loans by making loans in familiar markets to developers, reviewing the merits of individual projects, controlling loan structure, and monitoring project progress and construction advances.

The Corporation’s current lending standards for commercial real estate and real estate construction lending are determined by property type and specifically address many criteria, including: maximum loan amounts, maximum loan-to-value (“LTV”), requirements for pre-leasing and / or presales, minimum borrower equity, and maximum loan to cost. Currently, the maximum standard for LTV is 80%, with lower limits established for certain higher risk types, such as raw land which has a 50% LTV maximum. The Corporation’s LTV guidelines are in compliance with regulatory supervisory limits. In most cases, for real estate construction loans, the loan amounts include interest reserves, which are built into the loans and sized to fund loan payments through construction and lease up and / or sell out.

Consumer loans totaled $6.3 billion at June 30, 2014, up $248 million (4%) compared to December 31, 2013. Loans in this classification include residential mortgage, home equity, installment loans and credit cards. Residential mortgage loans totaled $4.1 billion at June 30, 2014, up $297 million (8%) from December 31, 2013. Residential mortgage loans include conventional first lien home mortgages and the Corporation generally limits the maximum loan to 80% of collateral value without credit enhancement (e.g. private mortgage insurance). As part of management’s historical practice of originating and servicing residential mortgage loans,

64


Table of Contents

generally the Corporation’s 30-year, fixed-rate residential real estate mortgage loans are sold in the secondary market with servicing rights retained. The Corporation also retains a portion of its 15-year and under, fixed-rate residential real estate mortgages in its loan portfolio. At June 30, 2014, the residential mortgage portfolio was comprised of $1.4 billion of fixed-rate residential real estate mortgages and $2.7 billion of adjustable-rate residential real estate mortgages.

The Corporation’s underwriting and risk-based pricing guidelines for residential mortgage loans include minimum borrower FICO and maximum LTV of the property securing the loan. Residential mortgage products generally are underwritten using FHLMC and FNMA secondary marketing guidelines.

Home equity totaled $1.7 billion at June 30, 2014, down $111 million (6%) compared to December 31, 2013, and consists of home equity lines, as well as home equity loans, approximately half of which are first lien positions. Home equity balances declined as customers continued to deleverage and refinance into lower-priced, first lien residential mortgage loans. Loans and lines in a junior position at June 30, 2014 included approximately 34% for which the Corporation also owned or serviced the related first lien loan and approximately 66% where the Corporation did not service the related first lien loan.

The Corporation’s credit risk monitoring guidelines for home equity is based on an ongoing review of loan delinquency status, as well as a semi-annual review of FICO score deterioration and property devaluation. The Corporation does not routinely obtain appraisals on performing loans to update LTV ratios after origination; however, the Corporation monitors the local housing markets by reviewing the various home price indices and incorporates the impact of the changing market conditions in its ongoing credit monitoring process. For second lien home equity loans, the Corporation is unable to track the performance of the first lien loan if it does not own or service the first lien loan. However, the Corporation obtains a refreshed FICO score on a semi-annual basis and monitors this as part of its assessment of the home equity portfolio.

The Corporation’s underwriting and risk-based pricing guidelines for home equity lines and loans consist of a combination of both borrower FICO and the original LTV of the property securing the loan. Currently, for home equity products, the maximum acceptable LTV is 90% for customers with FICO scores exceeding 670. Home equity loans generally have a 20 year term and are fixed rate with principal and interest payments required. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 39% of the home equity loan first liens have a remaining maturity of more than 10 years. Home equity lines are variable rate, interest only lines of credit which do not require the payment of principal during the initial revolving period, after which principal payments are required. Based upon outstanding balances at June 30, 2014, the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit revolving periods are scheduled to end.

$ in Thousands % to Total

Home Equity Lines of Credit—Revolving Period End Dates

2014 - 2015

$ 6,145 1 %

2016 - 2017

4,245 <1 %

2018 - 2020

36,133 4 %

2021 - 2025

238,304 28 %

2026 and later

581,215 67 %

Total home equity revolving lines of credit

$ 866,042 100 %

Installment and credit cards totaled $469 million at June 30, 2014 up $62 million (15%) compared to December 31, 2013, and consist of student loans, short-term and other personal installment loans and credit cards. The Corporation had $309 million and $330 million of student loans at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, the majority of which are government guaranteed. Credit risk for non-government guaranteed student, short-term and personal installment loans is generally influenced by general economic conditions, the characteristics of individual borrowers, and the nature of the loan collateral. Risks of loss are generally on smaller average balances per loan spread over many borrowers. Once charged off, there is usually less opportunity for recovery on these smaller retail loans. Credit risk is primarily controlled by reviewing the creditworthiness of the borrowers, monitoring payment histories, and taking appropriate collateral and guaranty positions.

Factors that are important to managing overall credit quality are sound loan underwriting and administration, systematic monitoring of existing loans and commitments, effective loan review on an ongoing basis, early identification of potential problems, and appropriate allowance for credit losses, nonaccrual and charge off policies.

65


Table of Contents

An active credit risk management process is used for commercial loans to further ensure that sound and consistent credit decisions are made. Credit risk is controlled by detailed underwriting procedures, comprehensive loan administration, and periodic review of borrowers’ outstanding loans and commitments. Borrower relationships are formally reviewed and graded on an ongoing basis for early identification of potential problems. Further analyses by customer, industry, and geographic location are performed to monitor trends, financial performance, and concentrations.

The loan portfolio is widely diversified by types of borrowers, industry groups, and market areas within our core footprint. Significant loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to numerous borrowers engaged in similar activities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. At June 30, 2014, no significant concentrations existed in the Corporation’s portfolio in excess of 10% of total loans.

TABLE 6

Period End Deposit and Customer Funding Composition

($ in Thousands)

June 30, 2014 March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 September 30, 2013 June 30, 2013
% of % of % of % of % of
Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total

Noninterest-bearing demand

$ 4,211,057 24 % $ 4,478,981 26 % $ 4,626,312 27 % $ 4,453,663 24 % $ 4,259,776 25 %

Savings

1,275,493 7 1,252,669 7 1,159,512 7 1,195,944 7 1,211,567 7

Interest-bearing demand

2,918,900 17 3,084,457 18 2,889,705 17 2,735,529 15 2,802,277 17

Money market

7,348,650 43 7,069,173 40 6,906,442 40 8,199,281 45 7,040,317 41

Brokered CDs

44,809 51,235 50,450 56,024 59,206

Other time

1,517,350 9 1,573,412 9 1,634,746 9 1,697,467 9 1,759,293 10

Total deposits

$ 17,316,259 100 % $ 17,509,927 100 % $ 17,267,167 100 % $ 18,337,908 100 % $ 17,132,436 100 %

Customer repo sweeps

489,886 548,179 419,247 515,555 489,700

Total customer funding

489,886 548,179 419,247 515,555 489,700

Total deposits and customer funding

$ 17,806,145 $ 18,058,106 $ 17,686,414 $ 18,853,463 $ 17,622,136

Network transaction deposits included above in interest-bearing demand and money market

$ 2,238,923 $ 2,141,976 $ 1,936,403 $ 2,222,810 $ 2,135,306

Total network transaction deposits and Brokered CDs

2,283,732 2,193,211 1,986,853 2,278,834 2,194,512

Total deposits and customer funding, excluding Brokered CDs and network transaction deposits

$ 15,522,413 $ 15,864,895 $ 15,699,561 $ 16,574,629 $ 15,427,624

Allowance for Credit Losses

Credit risks within the loan portfolio are inherently different for each loan type. Credit risk is controlled and monitored through the use of lending standards, a thorough review of potential borrowers, and ongoing review of loan payment performance. Active asset quality administration, including early problem loan identification and timely resolution of problems, aids in the management of credit risk and minimization of loan losses. Credit risk management for each loan type is discussed briefly in the section entitled “Credit Risk.”

The allowance for credit losses is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded commitments. The level of the allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of an amount appropriate to provide for probable credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance for unfunded commitments is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities (including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit) and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

The level of the allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of an amount appropriate to provide for probable credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. In general, the change in the allowance for credit losses is a function of a number of factors, including but not limited to changes in the loan portfolio (see Table 5), net charge offs (see Table 7) and nonperforming

66


Table of Contents

assets (see Table 8). The Corporation’s process, designed to assess the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses, focuses on an evaluation of facts and issues related to specific loans, management’s ongoing review and grading of the loan portfolio, consideration of historical loan loss and delinquency experience on each portfolio category, trends in past due and nonaccrual loans, the level of potential problem loans, the risk characteristics of the various classifications of loans, changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic conditions, the fair value of underlying collateral, and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. While management uses currently available information to recognize losses on loans, future adjustments to the allowance for credit losses may be necessary based on newly received appraisals, updated commercial customer financial statements, rapidly deteriorating customer cash flow, and changes in economic conditions that affect our customers. Management considers the allowance for credit losses a critical accounting policy (see section “Critical Accounting Policies”), as assessing these numerous factors involves significant judgment.

The methodology used for the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was generally comparable, whereby the Corporation segregated its loss factors (used for both criticized and non-criticized loan categories) into a component primarily based on historical loss rates and a component primarily based on other qualitative factors that may affect loan collectability. Management allocates the allowance for loan losses by pools of risk within each loan portfolio. The allocation methodology consists of the following components: First, a valuation allowance estimate is established for specifically identified commercial and consumer loans determined by the Corporation to be impaired, using discounted cash flows, estimated fair value of underlying collateral, and / or other data available. Second, management allocates the allowance for loan losses with loss factors, for criticized loan pools by loan type as well as for non-criticized loan pools by loan type, primarily based on historical loss rates after considering loan type, historical loss and delinquency experience, and industry statistics. Loans that have been criticized are considered to have a higher risk of default than non-criticized loans, as circumstances were present to support the lower loan grade, warranting higher loss factors. The loss factors applied in the methodology are periodically re-evaluated and adjusted to reflect changes in historical loss levels or other risks. Lastly, management allocates the allowance for loan losses to absorb unrecognized losses that may not be provided for by the other components due to other factors evaluated by management, such as limitations within the credit risk grading process, known current economic or business conditions that may not yet show in trends, industry or other concentrations with current issues that impose higher inherent risks than are reflected in the loss factors, and other relevant considerations. Because each of the criteria used is subject to change, the allocation of the allowance for loan losses is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend of future loan losses in any particular category. The total allowance for loan losses is available to absorb losses from any segment of the loan portfolio.

The methodology used for the allowance for unfunded commitments at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was also generally comparable. Management evaluated the unfunded credit facilities, including an assessment of historical commitment utilization experience and credit risk grading of the loan.

At June 30, 2014, the allowance for credit losses was $292 million compared to $300 million at June 30, 2013, and $290 million at December 31, 2013. At June 30, 2014, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.59% and covered 152% of nonaccrual loans, compared to 1.76% and 127%, respectively, at June 30, 2013, and 1.69% and 145%, respectively, at December 31, 2013. The ratio of net charge offs to average loans on an annualized basis was 0.10%, 0.36%, and 0.25% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and 2013, and the full year 2013, respectively. Tables 7 and 8 provide additional information regarding activity in the allowance for loan losses, impaired loans, and nonperforming assets. See Note 6, “Loans, Allowance for Credit Losses, and Credit Quality,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional allowance for loan losses disclosures.

Management believes the level of allowance for credit losses to be appropriate at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. For the remainder of 2014, the Corporation expects the provision for credit losses will grow based on expected loan growth and other factors.

67


Table of Contents

TABLE 7

Allowance for Credit Losses

($ in Thousands)

At and For the Six Months Ended At and For the Year
June 30, Ended December 31,
2014 2013 2013

Allowance for Loan Losses:

Balance at beginning of period

$ 268,315 $ 297,409 $ 297,409

Provision for loan losses

11,500 8,000 10,000

Charge offs

(20,468 ) (49,032 ) (88,061 )

Recoveries

12,504 20,841 48,967

Net charge offs

(7,964 ) (28,191 ) (39,094 )

Balance at end of period

$ 271,851 $ 277,218 $ 268,315

Allowance for Unfunded Commitments:

Balance at beginning of period

$ 21,900 $ 21,800 $ 21,800

Provision for unfunded commitments

(1,500 ) 600 100

Balance at end of period

$ 20,400 $ 22,400 $ 21,900

Allowance for credit losses (A)

$ 292,251 $ 299,618 $ 290,215

Provision for credit losses (B)

$ 10,000 $ 8,600 $ 10,100

Net loan charge offs:

(C ) (C ) (C )

Commercial and industrial

$ 1,348 5 $ 2,173 10 $ 6,281 14

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

(674 ) (13) 3,092 53 6,135 53

Lease financing

29 11 4 1 (12 ) (2)

Commercial and business lending

703 2 5,269 19 12,404 21

Commercial real estate—investor

(1,270 ) (9) 3,162 22 2,885 10

Real estate construction

908 20 1,297 36 (2,136 ) (27)

Commercial real estate lending

(362 ) (2) 4,459 25 749 2

Total commercial

341 1 9,728 21 13,153 14

Home equity revolving lines of credit

2,562 60 6,127 136 7,860 88

Home equity loans first liens

854 24 1,719 37 2,655 31

Home equity loans junior liens

1,807 183 3,991 319 5,902 250

Home equity

5,223 60 11,837 114 16,417 82

Installment and credit cards

360 18 243 11 (244 ) (6)

Residential mortgage

2,040 10 6,383 35 9,768 26

Total consumer

7,623 25 18,463 60 25,941 42

Total net charge offs

$ 7,964 10 $ 28,191 36 $ 39,094 25

CRE & Construction Net Charge Off Detail:

(C ) (C ) (C )

Farmland

$ $ 366 N/M $ 366 252

Multi-family

(67 ) (1) 409 9 499 5

Non-owner occupied

(1,203 ) (12) 2,387 24 2,020 10

Commercial real estate—investor

$ (1,270 ) (9) $ 3,162 22 $ 2,885 10

1-4 family construction

$ (117 ) (8) $ (208 ) (20) $ (3,796 ) (163)

All other construction

1,025 32 1,505 58 1,660 30

Real estate construction

$ 908 20 $ 1,297 36 $ (2,136 ) (27)

(A) – Includes the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded commitments.
(B) – Includes the provision for loan losses and the provision for unfunded commitments.
(C) – Annualized ratio of net charge offs to average loans by loan type in basis points.
N/M—Not meaningful.
Ratios:

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

1.59 % 1.76 % 1.69 %

Allowance for loan losses to net charge offs (annualized)

16.9 x 4.9 x 6.9 x

68


Table of Contents

TABLE 7 (continued)

Allowance for Credit Losses

($ in Thousands)

Quarterly Trends: June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
2014 2014 2013 2013 2013

Allowance for Loan Losses:

Balance at beginning of period

$ 267,916 $ 268,315 $ 271,724 $ 277,218 $ 286,923

Provision for loan losses

6,500 5,000 2,000 4,000

Charge offs

(9,107 ) (11,361 ) (18,742 ) (20,288 ) (21,904 )

Recoveries

6,542 5,962 13,333 14,794 8,199

Net charge offs

(2,565 ) (5,399 ) (5,409 ) (5,494 ) (13,705 )

Balance at end of period

$ 271,851 $ 267,916 $ 268,315 $ 271,724 $ 277,218

Allowance for Unfunded Commitments:

Balance at beginning of period

$ 21,900 $ 21,900 $ 21,600 $ 22,400 $ 21,100

Provision for unfunded commitments

(1,500 ) 300 (800 ) 1,300

Balance at end of period

$ 20,400 $ 21,900 $ 21,900 $ 21,600 $ 22,400

Allowance for credit losses (A)

$ 292,251 $ 289,816 $ 290,215 $ 293,324 $ 299,618

Provision for credit losses (B)

$ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 2,300 $ (800 ) $ 5,300

Net loan charge offs:

(C ) (C ) (C ) (C ) (C )

Commercial and industrial

$ (1,377 ) (10) $ 2,725 22 $ 4,555 38 $ (447 ) (4) $ 1,477 13

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

(550 ) (20) (124 ) (5) 967 34 2,076 72 1,574 54

Lease financing

29 22 (16 ) (12) 16 12

Commercial and business lending

(1,898 ) (12) 2,601 17 5,506 37 1,629 11 3,067 21

Commercial real estate—investor

(239 ) (3) (1,031 ) (14) 137 2 (414 ) (6) 2,999 41

Real estate construction

795 33 113 5 (3,130 ) (145) (303 ) (15) (95 ) (5)

Commercial real estate lending

556 6 (918 ) (10) (2,993 ) (32) (717 ) (8) 2,904 31

Total commercial

(1,342 ) (5) 1,683 7 2,513 10 912 4 5,971 25

Home equity revolving lines of credit

1,380 64 1,182 55 966 44 767 34 2,512 112

Home equity loans first liens

448 26 406 23 372 19 564 27 954 42

Home equity loans junior liens

948 196 859 171 1,111 205 800 140 2,034 336

Home equity

2,776 64 2,447 55 2,449 52 2,131 44 5,500 108

Installment and credit cards

247 25 113 11 (611 ) (59) 124 11 66 6

Residential mortgage

884 9 1,156 12 1,058 11 2,327 25 2,168 24

Total consumer

3,907 25 3,716 25 2,896 19 4,582 30 7,734 50

Total net charge offs

$ 2,565 6 $ 5,399 14 $ 5,409 14 $ 5,494 14 $ 13,705 35

CRE & Construction Net Charge Off Detail:

(C ) (C ) (C ) (C ) (C )

Farmland

$ (32 ) (84)

Multi-family

(18 ) (1) (49 ) (2) (37 ) (2) 127 5 942 40

Non-owner occupied

(221 ) (4) (982 ) (20) 174 4 (541 ) (11) 2,089 42

Commercial real estate—investor

$ (239 ) (3) (1,031 ) (14) 137 2 (414 ) (6) 2,999 41

1-4 family construction

$ 4 1 (121 ) (18) (2,684 ) (413) (904 ) (143) (349 ) (62)

All other construction

791 48 234 15 (446 ) (29) 601 41 254 19

Real estate construction

$ 795 33 113 5 (3,130 ) (145) (303 ) (15) (95 ) (5)

(A) – Includes the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded commitments.
(B) – Includes the provision for loan losses and the provision for unfunded commitments.
(C) – Annualized ratio of net charge offs to average loans by loan type in basis points.

69


Table of Contents

TABLE 8

Nonperforming Assets

($ in Thousands)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
2014 2014 2013 2013 2013

Nonperforming assets by type:

Commercial and industrial

$ 40,846 $ 38,488 $ 37,719 $ 36,105 $ 30,302

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

31,725 26,735 29,664 28,301 24,003

Lease financing

1,541 172 69 99 72

Commercial and business lending

74,112 65,395 67,452 64,505 54,377

Commercial real estate—investor

28,135 33,611 37,596 49,841 60,780

Real estate construction

6,988 6,667 6,467 18,670 21,419

Commercial real estate lending

35,123 40,278 44,063 68,511 82,199

Total commercial

109,235 105,673 111,515 133,016 136,576

Home equity revolving lines of credit

10,056 10,356 11,883 11,991 12,940

Home equity loans first liens

4,634 5,341 6,135 6,131 7,898

Home equity loans junior liens

6,183 6,788 7,149 7,321 7,296

Home equity

20,873 22,485 25,167 25,443 28,134

Installment and credit cards

771 915 1,114 1,269 1,533

Residential mortgage

48,347 48,905 47,632 47,866 51,250

Total consumer

69,991 72,305 73,913 74,578 80,917

Total nonaccrual loans (“NALs”)

179,226 177,978 185,428 207,594 217,493

Commercial real estate owned

9,498 8,224 8,359 10,003 11,696

Residential real estate owned

6,182 6,313 5,217 8,975 9,087

Bank properties real estate owned

2,049 4,636 4,542 6,099 6,624

Other real estate owned (“OREO”)

17,729 19,173 18,118 25,077 27,407

Total nonperforming assets (“NPAs”)

$ 196,955 $ 197,151 $ 203,546 $ 232,671 $ 244,900

Commercial real estate & Real estate construction NALs detail:

Farmland

$ $ $ $ 109 $ 70

Multi-family

3,929 3,713 3,782 5,260 6,726

Non-owner occupied

24,206 29,898 33,814 44,472 53,984

Commercial real estate—investor

$ 28,135 $ 33,611 $ 37,596 $ 49,841 $ 60,780

1-4 family construction

$ 1,843 $ 1,900 $ 1,915 $ 12,654 $ 14,222

All other construction

5,145 4,767 4,552 6,016 7,197

Real estate construction

$ 6,988 $ 6,667 $ 6,467 $ 18,670 $ 21,419

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:

Commercial

$ 289 $ 16 $ 1,199 $ 1,198 $ 770

Consumer

1,487 707 1,151 865 778

Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more

$ 1,776 $ 723 $ 2,350 $ 2,063 $ 1,548

Restructured loans (accruing):

Commercial

$ 83,999 $ 88,329 $ 94,265 $ 86,468 $ 87,970

Consumer

30,382 28,595 29,720 30,575 31,096

Total restructured loans (accruing)

$ 114,381 $ 116,924 $ 123,985 $ 117,043 $ 119,066

Nonaccrual restructured loans (included in nonaccrual loans)

$ 72,388 $ 74,231 $ 59,585 $ 69,311 $ 70,354

Ratios:

Nonaccrual loans to total loans

1.05 % 1.08 % 1.17 % 1.33 % 1.38 %

NPAs to total loans plus OREO

1.15 % 1.20 % 1.28 % 1.49 % 1.55 %

NPAs to total assets

0.77 % 0.79 % 0.84 % 0.98 % 1.04 %

Allowance for loan losses to NALs

151.68 % 150.53 % 144.70 % 130.89 % 127.46 %

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

1.59 % 1.63 % 1.69 % 1.74 % 1.76 %

70


Table of Contents

TABLE 8 (continued)

Nonperforming Assets

($ in Thousands)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
2014 2014 2013 2013 2013

Loans 30-89 days past due by type:

Commercial and industrial

$ 2,519 $ 4,126 $ 6,826 $ 6,518 $ 8,516

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

6,323 5,342 3,106 8,505 8,105

Lease financing

556 567 1,000 57

Commercial and business lending

9,398 10,035 9,932 16,023 16,678

Commercial real estate—investor

2,994 7,188 23,215 21,747 18,269

Real estate construction

258 679 1,954 820 797

Commercial real estate lending

3,252 7,867 25,169 22,567 19,066

Total commercial

12,650 17,902 35,101 38,590 35,744

Home equity revolving lines of credit

6,986 5,344 6,728 6,318 7,739

Home equity loans first liens

1,685 1,469 1,110 1,376 1,857

Home equity loans junior liens

2,138 3,006 2,842 2,206 2,709

Home equity

10,809 9,819 10,680 9,900 12,305

Installment and credit cards

1,734 1,269 1,150 1,170 1,434

Residential mortgage

7,070 4,498 6,118 6,722 9,920

Total consumer

19,613 15,586 17,948 17,792 23,659

Total loans past due 30-89 days

$ 32,263 $ 33,488 $ 53,049 $ 56,382 $ 59,403

Commercial real estate & Real estate construction loans 30-89 days past due detail:

Farmland

$ $ $ $ $ 455

Multi-family

2,524 14,755 216 14,533

Non-owner occupied

2,994 4,664 8,460 21,531 3,281

Commercial real estate—investor

$ 2,994 $ 7,188 $ 23,215 $ 21,747 $ 18,269

1-4 family construction

$ 242 $ 327 $ 987 $ 579 $ 449

All other construction

16 352 967 241 348

Real estate construction

$ 258 $ 679 $ 1,954 $ 820 $ 797

Potential problem loans by type:

Commercial and industrial

$ 187,251 $ 109,027 $ 113,669 $ 112,947 $ 127,382

Commercial real estate—owner occupied

57,757 64,785 56,789 61,256 75,074

Lease financing

2,280 3,065 1,784 207 279

Commercial and business lending

247,288 176,877 172,242 174,410 202,735

Commercial real estate—investor

31,903 34,790 52,429 87,526 89,342

Real estate construction

4,473 4,870 5,263 7,540 9,184

Commercial real estate lending

36,376 39,660 57,692 95,066 98,526

Total commercial

283,664 216,537 229,934 269,476 301,261

Home equity revolving lines of credit

277 310 303 170 308

Home equity loans first liens

Home equity loans junior liens

822 741 1,810 2,067 2,307

Home equity

1,099 1,051 2,113 2,237 2,615

Installment and credit cards

844 50 67 83

Residential mortgage

2,445 2,091 3,312 5,342 5,917

Total consumer

4,388 3,142 5,475 7,646 8,615

Total potential problem loans

$ 288,052 $ 219,679 $ 235,409 $ 277,122 $ 309,876

71


Table of Contents

Nonaccrual Loans, Potential Problem Loans, and Other Real Estate Owned

Management is committed to a proactive nonaccrual and problem loan identification philosophy. This philosophy is implemented through the ongoing monitoring and review of all pools of risk in the loan portfolio to ensure that problem loans are identified quickly and the risk of loss is minimized. Table 8 provides detailed information regarding nonperforming assets, which include nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned.

Nonaccrual Loans: Nonaccrual loans are considered one indicator of potential future loan losses. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that may adversely impact the collectability of principal or interest on loans, it is management’s practice to place such loans on nonaccrual status immediately, rather than delaying such action until the loans become 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed, amortization of related deferred loan fees or costs is suspended, and income is recorded only to the extent that interest payments are subsequently received in cash and a determination has been made that the principal and interest balance of the loan is collectible. If collectability of the principal and interest is in doubt, payments received are applied to loan principal.

Nonaccrual loans were $179 million at June 30, 2014, compared to $217 million at June 30, 2013 and $185 million at December 31, 2013. Total nonaccrual loans were down $38 million (18%) since June 30, 2013, and decreased $6 million (3%) from December 31, 2013. The ratio of nonaccrual loans to total loans was 1.05% at June 30, 2014, compared to 1.38% at June 30, 2013 and 1.17% at December 31, 2013. The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans was 152% at June 30, 2014, up from 127% at June 30, 2013 and 145% at December 31, 2013, respectively.

Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More : Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are classified as such where the underlying loans are both well secured (the collateral value is sufficient to cover principal and accrued interest) and are in the process of collection. At June 30, 2014, accruing loans 90 days or more past due totaled $2 million, relatively unchanged from both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013.

Troubled Debt Restructurings (“Restructured Loans”): Loans are considered restructured loans if concessions have been granted to borrowers that are experiencing financial difficulty. The concessions granted generally involve the modification of terms of the loan, such as changes in payment structure or interest rate, which generally would not otherwise be considered. Restructured loans can involve loans remaining on nonaccrual, moving to nonaccrual, or continuing on accrual status, depending on the individual facts and circumstances of the borrower. Nonaccrual restructured loans are included and treated with all other nonaccrual loans. In addition, all accruing restructured loans are reported as troubled debt restructurings, which are considered and accounted for as impaired loans. Generally, restructured loans remain on nonaccrual until the customer has attained a sustained period of repayment performance under the modified loan terms (generally a minimum of six months). However, performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events that coincide with the restructuring, are considered in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and whether the loan should be returned to or maintained on accrual status. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not reasonably assured, the loan remains on nonaccrual status.

Potential Problem Loans: The level of potential problem loans is another predominant factor in determining the relative level of risk in the loan portfolio and in determining the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses. Potential problem loans are generally defined by management to include loans rated as substandard by management but that are not considered impaired (i.e., nonaccrual loans and accruing troubled debt restructurings); however, there are circumstances present to create doubt as to the ability of the borrower to comply with present repayment terms. The decision of management to include performing loans in potential problem loans does not necessarily mean that the Corporation expects losses to occur, but that management recognizes a higher degree of risk associated with these loans. The loans that have been reported as potential problem loans are predominantly commercial loans covering a diverse range of businesses and real estate property types. At June 30, 2014, potential problem loans totaled $288 million, compared to $310 million at June 30, 2013 and $235 million at December 31, 2013, respectively. The increase in potential problem loans from December 31, 2013 was primarily due to the downgrade of several shared national credits in second quarter of 2014.

Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned was $18 million at June 30, 2014, compared to $27 million at June 30, 2013 and $18 million at December 31, 2013, respectively. Write-downs on other real estate owned were $1 million and $2 million for the first six months of 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $4 million for the full year 2013. Management actively seeks to ensure properties held are monitored to minimize the Corporation’s risk of loss.

72


Table of Contents

Liquidity

The objective of liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation has the ability to generate sufficient cash or cash equivalents in a timely and cost-effective manner to satisfy the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers and to meet its other commitments as they fall due, including the ability to pay dividends to shareholders, service debt, invest in subsidiaries or acquisitions, and satisfy other operating requirements. In addition to satisfying cash flow requirements in the ordinary course of business, the Corporation actively monitors and manages its liquidity position to ensure sufficient resources are available to meet cash flow requirements in adverse situations.

The Corporation’s internal liquidity management framework includes measurement of several key elements, such as deposit funding as a percent of total assets and liquid asset levels. Strong capital ratios, credit quality, and core earnings are essential to maintaining cost-effective access to wholesale funding markets. A downgrade or loss in credit ratings could have an impact on the Corporation’s ability to access wholesale funding at favorable interest rates. In addition to static liquidity measures, the Corporation performs dynamic scenario analysis in accordance with industry best practices. Measures have been established to ensure the Corporation has sufficient high quality short-term liquidity to meet cash flow requirements under stressed scenarios. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation was in compliance with its internal liquidity policies.

While core deposits and loan and investment securities repayments are principal sources of liquidity, funding diversification is another key element of liquidity management. Diversity is achieved by strategically varying depositor type, term, funding market, and instrument. The Parent Company and its subsidiary bank are rated by Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”), and Dominion Bond Rating Service (“DBRS”). Credit ratings by these nationally recognized statistical rating agencies are an important component of the Corporation’s liquidity profile. Credit ratings relate to the Corporation’s ability to issue debt securities and the cost to borrow money, and should not be viewed as an indication of future stock performance or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities. Among other factors, the credit ratings are based on financial strength, credit quality and concentrations in the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital adequacy, the quality of management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core deposits, and the Corporation’s ability to access a broad array of wholesale funding sources. Adverse changes in these factors could result in a negative change in credit ratings and impact not only the ability to raise funds in the capital markets but also the cost of these funds. Ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time and each rating should be evaluated independently. The senior credit ratings of the Parent Company and its subsidiary bank are displayed below.

June 30, 2014
Moody’s S&P DBRS

Bank short-term

P2 R2H

Bank long-term

A3 BBB+ BBBH

Corporation short-term

P2 R2M

Corporation long-term

Baa1 BBB BBB

Outlook

Stable Stable POS

The Corporation also has multiple funding sources that could be used to increase liquidity and provide additional financial flexibility. The Parent Company has filed a shelf registration with the SEC under which the Parent Company may, from time to time, offer shares of the Corporation’s common stock in connection with acquisitions of businesses, assets or securities of other companies. The Parent Company has also filed a universal shelf registration statement, under which the Parent Company may offer securities, either separately or in units: debt securities, preferred stock, depositary shares, common stock, and warrants. The Parent Company also has a $200 million commercial paper program, of which, $78 million was outstanding at June 30, 2014.

While dividends and service fees from subsidiaries and proceeds from issuance of capital are primary funding sources for the Parent Company, these sources could be limited or costly (such as by regulation or subject to the capital needs of its subsidiaries or by market appetite for bank holding company stock). The Parent Company received dividends of $127 million during the first six months of 2014 from subsidiaries.

73


Table of Contents

The Bank has established federal funds lines with counterparty banks and has the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank ($3.8 billion of Federal Home Loan Bank advances were outstanding at June 30, 2014). The Bank also has significant excess loan and investment securities collateral which could be pledged to secure additional deposits or to counterparty banks, the Federal Home Loan Bank or other parties as necessary. Associated Bank may also issue institutional certificates of deposit, network transaction deposits, and brokered certificates of deposit.

Investment securities are an important tool to the Corporation’s liquidity objective. As of June 30, 2014, the majority of investment securities are classified as available for sale, with only a portion of municipal securities (less than $250 million) classified as held to maturity. Of the $5.8 billion investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2014, a portion of these securities were pledged to secure collateralized deposits and repurchase agreements and for other purposes as required or permitted by law. The majority of the remaining investment securities of $2.8 billion could be pledged or sold to enhance liquidity, if necessary.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, net cash provided by operating activities and financing activities was $117 million and $1.4 billion, respectively, while net cash used in investing activities was $1.5 billion, for a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $44 million since year-end 2013. During the first six months of 2014, loans increased $1.1 billion and investment securities increased $327 million. On the funding side, deposits increased $49 million and short-term funding increased $1.6 billion, while long-term funding decreased $155 million.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, net cash provided by operating activities and financing activities was $193 million and $137 million, respectively, while net cash used in investing activities was $513 million, for a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $183 million since year-end 2012. During the first half of 2013, loans increased $336 million and investment securities decreased $36 million. On the funding side, deposits increased $193 million and short-term funding increased $438 million, while long-term funding decreased $401 million.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk and interest rate risk are managed centrally. Market risk is the potential for loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of fixed income securities, equity securities, other earning assets and derivative financial instruments as a result of changes in interest rates or other factors. Interest rate risk is the potential for reduced net interest income resulting from adverse changes in the level of interest rates. As a financial institution that engages in transactions involving an array of financial products, the Corporation is exposed to both market risk and interest rate risk. In addition to market risk, interest rate risk is measured and managed through a number of methods. The Corporation uses financial modeling simulation techniques that measure the sensitivity of future earnings due to changing rate environments to measure interest rate risk.

Policies established by the Corporation’s Asset / Liability Committee (“ALCO”) and approved by the Board of Directors are intended to limit these risks. The Board has delegated day-to-day responsibility for managing market and interest rate risk to ALCO. The primary objectives of market risk management is to minimize any adverse effect that changes in market risk factors may have on net interest income and to offset the risk of price changes for certain assets recorded at fair value.

Interest Rate Risk

In order to measure earnings sensitivity to changing market interest rates, the Corporation uses a simulation model to measure the impact of various interest rate shocks and other yield curve scenarios on earnings and the fair value of the financial assets and liabilities of the Corporation. The Corporation compares earnings between a static balance sheet scenario and balance sheets with projected growth scenarios to quantify the potential impact on such earnings of various balance sheet management and business strategies.

Simulation of earnings: Determining the sensitivity of short-term future earnings is accomplished through the use of simulation modeling. Assumptions involving projected balance sheet growth, market spreads, prepayments of rate-sensitive instruments, and the cash flows from maturing assets and liabilities are incorporated in these simulation analyses. These analyses are designed to project net interest income based on various interest rate scenarios, compared to a baseline scenario. The Corporation runs numerous scenarios including instantaneous and gradual changes to market interest rates as well as yield curve slope changes. It then compares such scenarios to the baseline scenario to quantify its earnings sensitivity.

74


Table of Contents

The resulting simulations for June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013 projected that net interest income would increase by approximately 1.1% and 0.4%, respectively, if rates rose instantaneously by a 100 bp shock and projected that net interest income would increase by approximately 2.5% and 0.9%, respectively, if rates rose instantaneously by a 200 bp shock. As of June 30, 2014, the simulations of earnings results were within the limits of the Corporation’s interest rate risk policy.

Market value of equity: The Corporation uses the market value of equity as a measure to quantify market risk from the impact of interest rates. The market value of equity is the fair value of assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet financial instruments derived from the present value of the future cash flows. While the net interest income simulation model highlights exposures over a short time horizon, the market value of equity incorporates all cash flows over all of the balance sheet and derivative positions.

These results are based on multiple path simulations using an interest rate simulation model calibrated to market traded instruments. Sensitivities are measured assuming several factors including immediate and sustained parallel and non-parallel changes in market rates, yield curves and rate indexes. These factors quantify yield curve risk, basis risk, options risk, repricing mismatch risk, and market spread risk. The results are considered to be conservative estimates due to the fact that no management action to mitigate potential income variances is included within the simulation assumption set. These potentially mitigating factors include future balance sheet growth, changes in yield curve relationships, and changing product spreads. As of June 30, 2014, the projected changes for the market value of equity were within the limits of the Corporation’s interest rate risk policy.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, and Contingent Liabilities

The Corporation utilizes a variety of financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers and to manage its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include lending-related commitments and derivative instruments. A discussion of the Corporation’s derivative instruments at June 30, 2014, is included in Note 10, “Derivative and Hedging Activities,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements. A discussion of the Corporation’s lending-related commitments is included in Note 12, “Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, and Contingent Liabilities,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements. See also Note 8, “Short and Long-Term Funding,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Corporation’s short-term and long-term funding.

Table 9 summarizes significant contractual obligations and other commitments at June 30, 2014, at those amounts contractually due to the recipient, including any premiums or discounts, hedge basis adjustments, or other similar carrying value adjustments.

TABLE 9: Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

One Year One to Three to Over
or Less Three Years Five Years Five Years Total
($ in Thousands)

Time deposits

$ 1,036,874 $ 328,849 $ 189,219 $ 7,217 $ 1,562,159

Short-term funding

2,337,171 2,337,171

Long-term funding

2 431,588 2,500,000 219 2,931,809

Operating leases

10,699 21,505 17,759 33,206 83,169

Commitments to extend credit

3,351,765 1,592,173 1,330,657 126,659 6,401,254

Total

$ 6,736,511 $ 2,374,115 $ 4,037,635 $ 167,301 $ 13,315,562

Capital

Stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2014 was $2.9 billion, up slightly ($39 million) from December 31, 2013. At June 30, 2014, stockholders’ equity included $10 million of accumulated other comprehensive income compared to $24 million of accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2013. Cash dividends of $0.18 per share were paid in the first half of 2014 and $0.16 per share were paid in the first half of 2013. The ratio of total stockholders’ equity to assets was 11.39% and 11.93% at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

During the first half of 2014, 4.0 million shares were repurchased for $69 million (or an average cost per common share of $17.27), while during the full year 2013, 7.7 million shares were repurchased for $120 million (or an average cost per common share of $15.57). The Corporation also repurchased shares for minimum tax withholding settlements on equity compensation totaling approximately $4 million (215,900 shares at an average cost per common share of $16.44) during the first half of 2014, compared to repurchases of shares for minimum tax withholding settlements on equity compensation totaling approximately $3 million (239,215 shares at an

75


Table of Contents

average cost per common share of $14.00) for the full year 2013. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation had $146 million remaining under repurchase authorizations previously approved by the Board of Directors. See section “Recent Developments” for additional information on the July 2014 common stock repurchases. See Part II, Item 2, “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds,” for additional information on the shares repurchased during the second quarter of 2014. The repurchase of shares will be based on market and investment opportunities, capital levels, growth prospects, and regulatory constraints. Such repurchases may occur from time to time in open market purchases, block transactions, private transactions, accelerated share repurchase programs, or similar facilities.

Management actively reviews capital strategies for the Corporation and each of its subsidiaries in light of perceived business risks, future growth opportunities, industry standards, and compliance with regulatory requirements. The assessment of overall capital adequacy depends on a variety of factors, including asset quality, liquidity, stability of earnings, changing competitive forces, economic condition in markets served, and strength of management. The capital ratios of the Corporation and its banking affiliate were in excess of regulatory minimum requirements. The Corporation’s capital ratios are summarized in Table 10.

76


Table of Contents

TABLE 10

Capital Ratios

(In Thousands, except per share data)

Quarter Ended
June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
2014 2014 2013 2013 2013

Total stockholders’ equity

$ 2,929,946 $ 2,901,024 $ 2,891,290 $ 2,872,282 $ 2,876,976

Tangible stockholders’ equity (1)

1,991,576 1,961,663 1,950,938 1,930,919 1,934,603

Tier 1 capital (2)

1,980,675 1,973,240 1,975,182 1,966,797 1,957,146

Tier 1 common equity (3)

1,919,651 1,912,083 1,913,320 1,904,060 1,893,875

Tangible common equity (1)

1,930,552 1,900,505 1,889,076 1,868,182 1,871,331

Total risk-based capital (2)

2,205,423 2,187,637 2,184,884 2,198,219 2,190,127

Tangible assets (1)

24,789,416 23,866,836 23,286,568 22,747,312 22,674,571

Risk weighted assets (2)

17,911,201 17,075,004 16,694,148 16,358,823 16,479,374

Market capitalization

2,883,398 2,907,877 2,829,640 2,545,053 2,578,765

Book value per common share

$ 17.99 $ 17.64 $ 17.40 $ 17.10 $ 16.97

Tangible book value per common share

12.11 11.80 11.62 11.37 11.28

Cash dividend per common share

0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08

Stock price at end of period

18.08 18.06 17.40 15.49 15.55

Low closing price for the period

16.82 15.58 15.34 15.29 13.81

High closing price for the period

18.39 18.35 17.56 17.60 15.69

Total stockholders’ equity / assets

11.39 % 11.69 % 11.93 % 12.13 % 12.18 %

Tangible common equity / tangible assets (1)

7.79 7.96 8.11 8.21 8.25

Tangible stockholders’ equity / tangible assets (1)

8.03 8.22 8.38 8.49 8.53

Tier 1 common equity / risk-weighted assets (3)

10.72 11.20 11.46 11.64 11.49

Tier 1 leverage ratio (2)

8.26 8.46 8.70 8.76 8.73

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (2)

11.06 11.56 11.83 12.02 11.88

Total risk-based capital ratio (2)

12.31 12.81 13.09 13.44 13.29

Common shares outstanding (period end)

159,480 161,012 162,623 164,303 165,837

Basic common shares outstanding (average)

159,940 161,467 162,611 164,954 166,605

Diluted common shares outstanding (average)

160,838 162,188 163,235 165,443 166,748

(1) Tangible stockholders’ equity, tangible common equity, and tangible assets are non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, any ratios utilizing these financial measures are non-GAAP measures. These financial measures have been included as they are considered to be critical metrics with which to analyze and evaluate financial condition and capital strength. Tangible stockholders’ equity is defined as stockholders’ equity excluding goodwill and other intangible assets. Tangible common equity is defined as common stockholders’ equity excluding goodwill and other intangible assets. Tangible assets is defined as total assets excluding goodwill and other intangible assets.
(2) The FRB establishes capital adequacy requirements, including well-capitalized standards for the Corporation. The OCC establishes similar capital adequacy requirements and standards for the Bank. Regulatory capital primarily consists of Tier 1 risk-based capital and Tier 2 risk-based capital. The sum of Tier 1 risk-based capital and Tier 2 risk-based capital equals our total risk-based capital. Risk-based capital guidelines require a minimum level of capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets. Risk-weighted assets consist of total assets plus certain off-balance sheet and market items, subject to adjustment for predefined credit risk factors.
(3) Tier 1 common equity, a non-GAAP financial measure, is used by banking regulators, investors and analysts to assess and compare the quality and composition of our capital with the capital of other financial services companies. Management uses Tier 1 common equity, along with other capital measures, to assess and monitor our capital position. Tier 1 common equity is defined as Tier 1 capital excluding qualifying perpetual preferred stock and qualifying trust preferred securities.

77


Table of Contents

Comparable Second Quarter Results

The Corporation recorded net income of $46 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to net income of $48 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Net income available to common equity was $45 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, or net income of $0.28 for both basic and diluted earnings per common share. Comparatively, net income available to common equity for the three months ended June 30, 2013, was $47 million, or net income of $0.28 for both basic and diluted earnings per common share (see Table 1).

Taxable equivalent net interest income for the second quarter of 2014 was $173 million, $8 million higher than the second quarter of 2013 (see Table 2). Changes in the balance sheet volume and mix increased taxable equivalent net interest income by $8 million, while changes in the rate environment remained relatively level. The Federal funds target rate was unchanged for both the second quarter of 2014 and the second quarter of 2013. The net interest margin between the comparable quarters was down 8 bp, to 3.08% in the second quarter of 2014. Average earning assets increased $1.6 billion to $22.5 billion in the second quarter of 2014, with average loans up $919 million (predominantly in commercial loans) and investments and other short-term investments up $668 million (predominantly in mortgage related securities). On the funding side, average interest-bearing deposits were up $186 million and average demand deposits decreased $118 million, while average short and long-term funding was up $1.5 billion (mainly due to FHLB advances).

Credit quality continued to improve with nonaccrual loans declining to $179 million (1.05% of total loans) at June 30, 2014, compared to $217 million (1.38% of total loans) at June 30, 2013 (see Table 8). Compared to the second quarter of 2013, potential problem loans were down 7% to $288 million. The provision for credit losses was $5 million for the second quarter of 2014, flat compared to the second quarter of 2013 (see Table 7). Annualized net charge offs represented 0.06% of average loans for the second quarter of 2014 compared to 0.35% for the second quarter of 2013. The allowance for loan losses to loans at June 30, 2014 was 1.59%, compared to 1.76% at June 30, 2013. See discussion under sections, “Provision for Credit Losses,” “Allowance for Credit Losses,” and “Nonaccrual Loans, Potential Problem Loans, and Other Real Estate Owned.”

Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2014 decreased $12 million (14%) to $72 million versus the second quarter of 2013. Core fee-based revenue increased $5 million primarily in insurance commissions due to a $3 million reserve established in the second quarter of 2013 related to third party insurance products sold in prior years. Net mortgage banking income was $5 million, down $14 million from the second of 2013, predominantly due to a decline in the gain on sales of mortgage loans and changes in the mortgage servicing rights valuation reserve (from an $8 million recovery in the second quarter of 2013 versus none in the second quarter of 2014). Net capital market fees decreased $3 million primarily due to the change in the credit risk of interest related derivative instruments. Other income decreased $1million from the second quarter of 2013 due to one-time charges related to customer reimbursements paid in the second quarter of 2014.

On a comparable quarter basis, noninterest expense decreased $1 million (1%) to $168 million in the second quarter of 2014. Personnel expense decreased $2 million (2%) from the second quarter of 2013, primarily due to lower health insurance expenses (reflecting changes in employee health decisions) and lower pension expense. Legal and professional fees decreased $1 million due to a decrease in consultant costs. Technology increased $2 million as we continue to invest in solutions that will drive operational efficiency.

For the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation recognized income tax expense of $22 million, compared to income tax expense of $23 million for the second quarter of 2013. The effective tax rate was 31.84% and 32.07% for the second quarter of 2014 and the second quarter of 2013, respectively.

78


Table of Contents

TABLE 11

Selected Quarterly Information

($ in Thousands)

Quarter Ended
June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
2014 2014 2013 2013 2013

Summary of Operations:

Net interest income

$ 168,703 $ 164,973 $ 167,199 $ 160,509 $ 160,182

Provision for credit losses

5,000 5,000 2,300 (800 ) 5,300

Noninterest income

Trust service fees

12,017 11,711 11,938 11,380 11,405

Service charges on deposit accounts

17,412 16,400 17,330 18,407 17,443

Card-based and other nondeposit fees

12,577 12,509 12,684 12,688 12,591

Insurance commissions

13,651 12,317 11,274 11,356 9,631

Brokerage and annuity commissions

4,520 4,033 3,881 3,792 3,688

Total core fee-based revenue

60,177 56,970 57,107 57,623 54,758

Mortgage banking, net

5,362 6,361 8,277 3,542 19,263

Capital market fees, net

2,099 2,322 2,771 2,652 5,074

BOLI income

3,011 4,320 2,787 2,817 3,281

Asset gains (losses), net

899 728 2,687 1,934 (44 )

Investment securities gains (losses), net

34 378 (18 ) 248 34

Other

665 2,442 2,262 2,100 1,944

Total noninterest income

72,247 73,521 75,873 70,916 84,310

Noninterest expense

Personnel expense

97,793 97,698 101,215 98,102 99,791

Occupancy

13,785 15,560 14,684 14,758 14,305

Equipment

6,227 6,276 6,509 6,213 6,462

Technology

14,594 12,724 12,963 12,323 12,651

Business development and advertising

5,077 5,062 7,834 5,947 5,028

Other intangible asset amortization

991 991 1,011 1,010 1,011

Loan expense

3,620 2,787 3,677 3,157 3,044

Legal and professional fees

4,436 4,188 5,916 3,482 5,483

Losses other than loans

381 544 1,559 (600 ) 499

Foreclosure / OREO expense

1,575 1,896 2,829 2,515 2,302

FDIC expense

4,945 5,001 4,879 4,755 4,395

Other

14,501 14,931 16,091 13,509 13,725

Total noninterest expense

167,925 167,658 179,167 165,171 168,696

Income tax expense

21,660 20,637 13,847 21,396 22,608

Net income

46,365 45,199 47,758 45,658 47,888

Preferred stock dividends

1,278 1,244 1,273 1,285 1,300

Net income available to common equity

$ 45,087 $ 43,955 $ 46,485 $ 44,373 $ 46,588

Taxable equivalent net interest income

$ 173,360 $ 169,629 $ 172,237 $ 165,457 $ 165,178

Net interest margin

3.08 % 3.12 % 3.23 % 3.13 % 3.16 %

Effective tax rate

31.84 % 31.35 % 22.48 % 31.91 % 32.07 %

Average Balances:

Assets

$ 24,858,072 $ 24,213,213 $ 23,558,725 $ 23,313,577 $ 23,306,220

Earning assets

22,537,515 21,892,503 21,242,065 21,039,467 20,951,244

Interest-bearing liabilities

17,711,534 16,962,190 16,135,174 16,010,930 15,988,021

Loans

16,646,389 16,164,617 15,748,284 15,724,365 15,727,807

Deposits

17,172,832 16,990,272 17,881,531 17,609,819 17,105,078

Short and long-term funding

4,612,012 4,138,223 2,606,958 2,665,415 3,074,647

Stockholders’ equity

$ 2,891,118 $ 2,888,768 $ 2,872,638 $ 2,862,890 $ 2,920,994

79


Table of Contents

Sequential Quarter Results

The Corporation recorded net income of $46 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to net income of $45 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Net income available to common equity was $45 million for the second quarter of 2014, or net income of $0.28 for both basic and diluted earnings per common share. Comparatively, net income available to common equity for the first quarter of 2014, was $44 million, or net income of $0.27 for both basic and diluted earnings per common share (see Table 1).

Taxable equivalent net interest income for the second quarter of 2014 was $173 million, $4 million higher than the first quarter of 2014, as changes in the balance sheet volume and mix increased taxable equivalent net interest income by $4 million, and changes in the rate environment and product pricing increased net interest income by $1 million, while the day count difference between quarters decreased net interest income by $1 million. The Federal funds target rate was unchanged for both quarters. The net interest margin in the second quarter of 2014 was down 4 bp, to 3.08%. Average earning assets increased $645 million to $22.5 billion in the second quarter of 2014, with average loans up $482 million (predominantly in commercial loans) and average investments and other short-term investments up $163 million (predominantly in mortgage related securities). On the funding side, average short and long-term funding was up $474 million (primarily short-term FHLB advances), while average interest-bearing deposits were up $276 million (primarily money market deposits).

Nonaccrual loans were up slightly, to $179 million (1.05% of total loans) at June 30, 2014, compared to $178 million (1.08% of total loans) at March 31, 2014 (see Table 8). Potential problem loans increased to $288 million, up $68 million from the first quarter of 2014. The provision for credit losses for the second quarter of 2014 was $5 million, flat compared to the first quarter of 2014 (see Table 7). Annualized net charge offs represented 0.06% of average loans for the second quarter of 2014 compared to 0.14% for the first quarter of 2014. The allowance for loan losses to loans at June 30, 2014 was 1.59%, compared to 1.63% at March 31, 2014 (see Table 8). See discussion under sections, “Provision for Credit Losses,” “Allowance for Credit Losses,” and “Nonaccrual Loans, Potential Problem Loans, and Other Real Estate Owned.”

Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2014 decreased $1 million (2%) to $72 million versus the first quarter of 2014. Core fee-based revenue increased $3 million (6%) from the first quarter of 2014. All core-based fee revenue categories increased from the first quarter with insurance commissions and service charges on deposit accounts accounting for the majority of the growth. Net mortgage banking income was $5 million, down $1 million (16%) from the first quarter of 2014, predominantly due to a decline in the gain on sales of mortgage loans. Bank owned life insurance income decreased $1 million primarily due to the death benefits received during the first quarter of 2014. Other income decreased $2 million from the first quarter of 2014 primarily due to one-time charges related to some customer reimbursements paid in the second quarter of 2014.

On a sequential quarter basis, noninterest expense remained relatively unchanged at $168 million for both the second quarter and first quarter of 2014. Occupancy expense declined $2 million from the first quarter of 2014 predominantly due to the seasonal decline in contracted services, mainly snow removal. Technology expense increased $2 million from the first quarter of 2014 as we continue to invest in solutions that will drive operational efficiency.

For the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation recognized income tax expense of $22 million, compared to income tax expense of $21 million for the first quarter of 2014. The effective tax rate was 31.84% and 31.35% for the second quarter of 2014 and the first quarter of 2014, respectively.

Future Accounting Pronouncements

New accounting policies adopted by the Corporation are discussed in Note 2, “New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements. The expected impact of accounting pronouncements recently issued or proposed but not yet required to be adopted are discussed below. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affects the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable sections of this financial review and the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued an amendment to the stock compensation accounting guidance to clarify that a performance target that affects vesting of a share-based payment and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. This amendment is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The Corporation intends to adopt the accounting standard during the first quarter of 2016, as required, and is currently evaluating the impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.

80


Table of Contents

In June 2014, the FASB issued an amendment to clarify the current accounting and disclosures for certain repurchase agreements. The amendments in this Update require two accounting changes: (1) change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting and (2) require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The amendments in this Update also require additional disclosures for certain transactions on the transfer of financial assets, as well as new disclosures for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and repurchase-to-maturity transactions that are accounted for as secured borrowings. This amendment is effective for public business entities for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. Early application is prohibited. The Corporation intends to adopt the accounting standard during the first quarter of 2015, as required, and is currently evaluating the impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.

In May 2014, the FASB issued an amendment to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard. The standard outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the revenue model is that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” In applying the revenue model to contracts within its scope, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) Identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) Identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) Determine the transaction price, (4) Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The standard applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other topics in the FASB Codification. The standard also requires significantly expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. The amendment is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (including interim reporting periods within those periods). Early application is not permitted. The Corporation intends to adopt the accounting standard during the first quarter of 2017, as required, and is currently evaluating the impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.

In January 2014, the FASB issued an amendment to clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar agreement. In addition, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure in accordance with local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. This amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments using either a modified retrospective method or a prospective transition method. Early adoption is permitted. The Corporation intends to adopt the accounting standard during the first quarter of 2015, as required, with no expected material impact on its results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.

In January 2014, the FASB issued an amendment which permits reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). For those investments in qualified affordable housing projects not accounted for using the proportional method, the investment should be accounted for as an equity method investment or a cost method investment. The decision to apply the proportional amortization method of accounting is an accounting policy decision that should be applied consistently to all qualifying affordable housing project investments rather than a decision to be applied to individual investments. This amendment should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. A reporting entity that uses the effective yield method to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects before the date of adoption may continue to apply the effective yield method for those preexisting investments. This amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. The Corporation intends to adopt the accounting standard during the first quarter of 2015, as required, with no expected material impact on its results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.

81


Table of Contents

Recent Developments

On July 1, 2014, the Corporation repurchased approximately 1.6 million shares of common stock for $30 million under an accelerated share repurchase program. On July 24, 2014, the Corporation repurchased approximately 3.1 million shares of common stock for $60 million under an accelerated share repurchase program. After these common stock repurchases, the Corporation has $56 million remaining under repurchase authorizations previously approved by the Board of Directors.

On July 22, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per common share, payable on September 15, 2014, to shareholders of record at the close of business on September 2, 2014. The Board of Directors also declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.50 per depositary share on Associated Banc-Corp’s 8.00% Series B Perpetual Preferred Stock payable on September 15, 2014, to shareholders of record at the close of business on September 2, 2014. These cash dividends have not been reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Information required by this item is set forth in Item 2 under the captions “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” and “Interest Rate Risk.”

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

The Corporation maintains disclosure controls and procedures as required under Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2014. No changes were made to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act of 1934) during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

The following is a description of the Corporation’s material pending legal proceedings.

A lawsuit, R.J. ZAYED v. Associated Bank, N.A., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on January 29, 2013. The lawsuit relates to a Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Oxford Global Partners and related entities (“Oxford”) and individuals and was brought by the receiver for Oxford. Oxford was a depository customer of the Bank. The lawsuit claims that the Bank is liable for failing to uncover the Oxford Ponzi scheme, and specifically alleges the Bank aided and abetted (1) the fraudulent scheme; (2) a breach of fiduciary duty; (3) conversion; and (4) false representations and omissions. The lawsuit seeks unspecified consequential and punitive damages. The District Court granted the Bank’s motion to dismiss the complaint on September 30, 2013, and the plaintiff has appealed such dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. It is not possible for management to assess the probability of a material adverse outcome or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss at this time. A lawsuit by investors in the same Ponzi scheme, Herman Grad, et al v. Associated Bank, N.A., brought in Brown County, Wisconsin in October 2009 was dismissed by the circuit court, and the dismissal was affirmed by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals in June 2011 in an unpublished opinion.

A purported class action lawsuit, Wanda Boone v. Associated Banc-Corp, was filed on April 10, 2014 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The lawsuit claims that loan coordinators employed by the Bank were not compensated for all hours worked, including the payment of overtime, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and Wisconsin wage laws. The lawsuit seeks monetary damages and attorneys’ fees. The Corporation filed a motion to dismiss on June 5, 2014. On July 29, 2014, the parties entered into a Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Case which provided for the dismissal of the case with prejudice. As part of the resolution of this matter, the Corporation made an immaterial payment to the plaintiff.

82


Table of Contents

The Bank entered into a Stipulation and Consent Order for a Civil Money Penalty with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) dated June 26, 2014, which provides for the payment by the Bank of a civil money penalty of $500,000. The civil money penalty, which was paid in June 2014, relates to BSA/AML deficiencies which were the subject of a Consent Order dated February 23, 2012. The Consent Order was subsequently terminated in March, 2014.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Following are the Corporation’s monthly common stock purchases during the second quarter of 2014. For a detailed discussion of the common stock repurchase authorizations and repurchases during the period, see section “Capital” included under Part I Item 2 of this document. See section, “Recent Developments” for additional information on the July 2014 common stock repurchases.

Period

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased (a)
Average Price
Paid per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
Maximum
Number of
Shares that May
Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plan (b)

April 1, 2014—April 30, 2014

1,643,161 $ 17.36 1,643,161

May 1, 2014—May 31, 2014

85,861 17.36 85,861

June 1, 2014—June 30, 2014

Total

1,729,022 $ 17.36 1,729,022 8,069,799

(a) During the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation repurchased 24,870 shares for minimum tax withholding settlements on equity compensation. These purchases are not included in the monthly common stock purchases table above and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the Board of Directors’ authorization.
(b) On July 23, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the Corporation to repurchase up to an aggregate amount of $120 million of common stock, of which, $26 million remained available to repurchase as of June 30, 2014. On March 18, 2014, the Board of Directors also authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $120 million of common stock, which is in addition to the $26 million remaining under the July 2013 common stock repurchase authorization. Using the closing stock price on June 30, 2014 of $18.08, a total of approximately 8.1 million common shares remained available to be repurchased under both authorizations as of June 30, 2014.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits:

Exhibit (10.1), Form of Restricted Stock Agreement.

Exhibit (10.2), Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.

Exhibit (11), Statement regarding computation of per-share earnings. See Note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in Part I Item 1.

Exhibit (31.1), Certification Under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley by Philip B. Flynn, Chief Executive Officer.

Exhibit (31.2), Certification Under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley by Christopher J. Del Moral-Niles, Chief Financial Officer.

Exhibit (32), Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley.

Exhibit (101), Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

83


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP

(Registrant)
Date: August 4, 2014

/s/ Philip B. Flynn

Philip B. Flynn
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 4, 2014

/s/ Christopher J. Del Moral-Niles

Christopher J. Del Moral-Niles
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

84

TABLE OF CONTENTS