BOEING CO
10-Qs and 10-Ks
PROXIES
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
ý
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2014
or
|
¨
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number
1-442
|
THE BOEING COMPANY
|
||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
|
91-0425694
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
100 N. Riverside Plaza, Chicago, IL
|
|
60606-1596
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
(312) 544-2000
|
||
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer
|
ý
|
Accelerated filer
|
¨
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
¨
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
ý
As of
April 16, 2014
, there were
729,224,508
shares of common stock, $5.00 par value, issued and outstanding.
THE BOEING COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
For the
Quarter
Ended
March 31, 2014
INDEX
|
Part I. Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
Page
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
||
|
Item 2.
|
||
|
Item 3.
|
||
|
Item 4.
|
||
|
Part II. Other Information
|
||
|
Item 1.
|
||
|
Item 1A.
|
||
|
Item 2.
|
||
|
Item 3.
|
||
|
Item 4.
|
||
|
Item 5.
|
||
|
Item 6.
|
||
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
The Boeing Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Sales of products
|
|
$18,015
|
|
|
$16,318
|
|
|
|
Sales of services
|
2,450
|
|
2,575
|
|
|||
|
Total revenues
|
20,465
|
|
18,893
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cost of products
|
(15,258
|
)
|
(13,728
|
)
|
|||
|
Cost of services
|
(2,020
|
)
|
(2,009
|
)
|
|||
|
Boeing Capital interest expense
|
(18
|
)
|
(19
|
)
|
|||
|
Total costs and expenses
|
(17,296
|
)
|
(15,756
|
)
|
|||
|
3,169
|
|
3,137
|
|
||||
|
Income from operating investments, net
|
59
|
|
45
|
|
|||
|
General and administrative expense
|
(877
|
)
|
(971
|
)
|
|||
|
Research and development expense, net
|
(809
|
)
|
(705
|
)
|
|||
|
Gain on dispositions, net
|
|
|
22
|
|
|||
|
Earnings from operations
|
1,542
|
|
1,528
|
|
|||
|
Other income, net
|
9
|
|
9
|
|
|||
|
Interest and debt expense
|
(92
|
)
|
(99
|
)
|
|||
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
1,459
|
|
1,438
|
|
|||
|
Income tax expense
|
(494
|
)
|
(332
|
)
|
|||
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
965
|
|
1,106
|
|
|||
|
Net gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net earnings
|
|
$965
|
|
|
|
$1,106
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$1.30
|
|
|
$1.45
|
|
|
|
Net gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
|||||
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$1.30
|
|
|
$1.45
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$1.28
|
|
|
$1.44
|
|
|
|
Net gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$1.28
|
|
|
$1.44
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per share
|
|
$0.73
|
|
|
$0.49
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares (millions)
|
754.1
|
|
768.7
|
|
|||
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
The Boeing Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||
|
Net earnings
|
|
$965
|
|
|
$1,106
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|||||||
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
17
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|||
|
Unrealized gain on certain investments, net of tax of ($1) and $0
|
2
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized (loss)/gain on derivative instruments:
|
|||||||
|
Unrealized loss arising during period, net of tax of $6 and $15
|
(11
|
)
|
(26
|
)
|
|||
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net earnings, net of tax of ($3) and ($1)
|
5
|
|
2
|
|
|||
|
Total unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net of tax
|
(6
|
)
|
(24
|
)
|
|||
|
Defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefits:
|
|||||||
|
Amortization of prior service cost included in net periodic pension cost, net of tax of ($3) and ($1)
|
6
|
|
3
|
|
|||
|
Net actuarial gain arising during the period, net of tax of ($346) and ($16)
|
620
|
|
30
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of actuarial losses included in net periodic pension cost, net of tax of ($94) and ($215)
|
169
|
|
378
|
|
|||
|
Settlements and curtailments included in net income, net of tax of ($113) and ($5)
|
203
|
|
9
|
|
|||
|
Pension and postretirement benefit related to our equity method investments, net of tax $0 and ($1)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|||
|
Total defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefits, net of tax
|
998
|
|
422
|
|
|||
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
1,011
|
|
375
|
|
|||
|
Comprehensive income related to noncontrolling interest
|
3
|
|
2
|
|
|||
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
$1,979
|
|
|
$1,483
|
|
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
The Boeing Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
(Unaudited)
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
|||
|
Assets
|
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$6,942
|
|
|
$9,088
|
|
|
|
Short-term and other investments
|
5,282
|
|
6,170
|
|
|||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
7,341
|
|
6,546
|
|
|||
|
Current portion of customer financing, net
|
256
|
|
344
|
|
|||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
15
|
|
14
|
|
|||
|
Inventories, net of advances and progress billings
|
44,941
|
|
42,912
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
64,777
|
|
65,074
|
|
|||
|
Customer financing, net
|
3,280
|
|
3,627
|
|
|||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $15,281 and $15,070
|
10,263
|
|
10,224
|
|
|||
|
Goodwill
|
5,046
|
|
5,043
|
|
|||
|
Acquired intangible assets, net
|
2,996
|
|
3,052
|
|
|||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
2,463
|
|
2,939
|
|
|||
|
Investments
|
1,208
|
|
1,204
|
|
|||
|
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $478 and $448
|
1,542
|
|
1,500
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
|
$91,575
|
|
|
$92,663
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity
|
|||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$10,779
|
|
|
$9,498
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
12,219
|
|
14,131
|
|
|||
|
Advances and billings in excess of related costs
|
21,112
|
|
20,027
|
|
|||
|
Deferred income taxes and income taxes payable
|
6,732
|
|
6,267
|
|
|||
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
|
1,660
|
|
1,563
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
52,502
|
|
51,486
|
|
|||
|
Accrued retiree health care
|
6,515
|
|
6,528
|
|
|||
|
Accrued pension plan liability, net
|
9,676
|
|
10,474
|
|
|||
|
Non-current income taxes payable
|
166
|
|
156
|
|
|||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
808
|
|
950
|
|
|||
|
Long-term debt
|
7,275
|
|
8,072
|
|
|||
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
|||||||
|
Common stock, par value $5.00 – 1,200,000,000 shares authorized; 1,012,261,159 shares issued
|
5,061
|
|
5,061
|
|
|||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
4,441
|
|
4,415
|
|
|||
|
Treasury stock, at cost – 281,510,590 and 264,882,461 shares
|
(20,028
|
)
|
(17,671
|
)
|
|||
|
Retained earnings
|
33,929
|
|
32,964
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(8,883
|
)
|
(9,894
|
)
|
|||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
14,520
|
|
14,875
|
|
|||
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
113
|
|
122
|
|
|||
|
Total equity
|
14,633
|
|
14,997
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$91,575
|
|
|
$92,663
|
|
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
The Boeing Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
||
|
Cash flows – operating activities:
|
|
||||||
|
Net earnings
|
|
$965
|
|
|
|
$1,106
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
||||||
|
Non-cash items –
|
|
||||||
|
Share-based plans expense
|
52
|
|
|
58
|
|
||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
448
|
|
|
429
|
|
||
|
Investment/asset impairment charges, net
|
29
|
|
|
26
|
|
||
|
Customer financing valuation benefit
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|||
|
Gain on dispositions, net
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|||
|
Other charges and credits, net
|
47
|
|
|
53
|
|
||
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
|
(68
|
)
|
|
(23
|
)
|
||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities –
|
|
||||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
(792
|
)
|
|
(437
|
)
|
||
|
Inventories, net of advances and progress billings
|
(2,049
|
)
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
||
|
Accounts payable
|
1,350
|
|
|
654
|
|
||
|
Accrued liabilities
|
(1,385
|
)
|
|
(1,133
|
)
|
||
|
Advances and billings in excess of related costs
|
1,085
|
|
|
1,833
|
|
||
|
Income taxes receivable, payable and deferred
|
455
|
|
|
214
|
|
||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
(124
|
)
|
|
(73
|
)
|
||
|
Pension and other postretirement plans
|
733
|
|
|
821
|
|
||
|
Customer financing, net
|
408
|
|
|
24
|
|
||
|
Other
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
1,112
|
|
|
524
|
|
||
|
Cash flows – investing activities:
|
|||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment additions
|
(497
|
)
|
(521
|
)
|
|||
|
Property, plant and equipment reductions
|
15
|
|
33
|
|
|||
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|||
|
Contributions to investments
|
(2,737
|
)
|
(2,955
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from investments
|
3,625
|
|
2,655
|
|
|||
|
Net cash provided/(used) by investing activities
|
406
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash flows – financing activities:
|
|||||||
|
New borrowings
|
51
|
|
15
|
|
|||
|
Debt repayments
|
(757
|
)
|
(1,262
|
)
|
|||
|
Payments to noncontrolling interests
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|||
|
Repayments of distribution rights and other asset financing
|
(3
|
)
|
(138
|
)
|
|||
|
Stock options exercised, other
|
109
|
|
76
|
|
|||
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
|
68
|
|
23
|
|
|||
|
Employee taxes on certain share-based payment arrangements
|
(84
|
)
|
(52
|
)
|
|||
|
Common shares repurchased
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
|||
|
Dividends paid
|
(540
|
)
|
(367
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
(3,668
|
)
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
4
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|||
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(2,146
|
)
|
(2,006
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
9,088
|
|
10,341
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$6,942
|
|
|
$8,335
|
|
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
The Boeing Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
Boeing shareholders
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
Non-
controlling
Interest
|
|
Total
|
|
|||||||
|
Balance at January 1, 2013
|
|
$5,061
|
|
|
$4,122
|
|
|
($15,937
|
)
|
|
$30,037
|
|
|
($17,416
|
)
|
|
$100
|
|
|
$5,967
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
1,106
|
|
2
|
|
1,108
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of ($224)
|
375
|
|
375
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation and related dividend equivalents
|
58
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Excess tax pools
|
17
|
|
17
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Treasury shares issued for stock options exercised, net
|
(4
|
)
|
85
|
|
81
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Treasury shares issued for other share-based plans, net
|
(114
|
)
|
72
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Changes in noncontrolling interest
|
(4
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at March 31, 2013
|
|
$5,061
|
|
|
$4,079
|
|
|
($15,780
|
)
|
|
$31,143
|
|
|
($17,041
|
)
|
|
$98
|
|
|
$7,560
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2014
|
|
$5,061
|
|
|
$4,415
|
|
|
($17,671
|
)
|
|
$32,964
|
|
|
($9,894
|
)
|
|
$122
|
|
|
$14,997
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
965
|
|
3
|
|
968
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of ($554)
|
1,011
|
|
1,011
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation and related dividend equivalents
|
55
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Excess tax pools
|
68
|
|
68
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Treasury shares issued for stock options exercised, net
|
12
|
|
102
|
|
114
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Treasury shares issued for other share-based plans, net
|
(109
|
)
|
41
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Common shares repurchased
|
(2,500
|
)
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Changes in noncontrolling interest
|
(12
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at March 31, 2014
|
|
$5,061
|
|
|
$4,441
|
|
|
($20,028
|
)
|
|
$33,929
|
|
|
($8,883
|
)
|
|
$113
|
|
|
$14,633
|
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
The Boeing Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Summary of Business Segment Data
(Unaudited)
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues:
|
|||||||
|
Commercial Airplanes
|
|
$12,737
|
|
|
$10,690
|
|
|
|
Defense, Space & Security:
|
|||||||
|
Boeing Military Aircraft
|
3,458
|
|
3,980
|
|
|||
|
Network & Space Systems
|
1,876
|
|
1,960
|
|
|||
|
Global Services & Support
|
2,299
|
|
2,170
|
|
|||
|
Total Defense, Space & Security
|
7,633
|
|
8,110
|
|
|||
|
Boeing Capital
|
82
|
|
105
|
|
|||
|
Other segment
|
20
|
|
27
|
|
|||
|
Unallocated items and eliminations
|
(7
|
)
|
(39
|
)
|
|||
|
Total revenues
|
|
$20,465
|
|
|
$18,893
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations:
|
|||||||
|
Commercial Airplanes
|
|
$1,502
|
|
|
$1,219
|
|
|
|
Defense, Space & Security:
|
|||||||
|
Boeing Military Aircraft
|
332
|
|
427
|
|
|||
|
Network & Space Systems
|
168
|
|
156
|
|
|||
|
Global Services & Support
|
278
|
|
249
|
|
|||
|
Total Defense, Space & Security
|
778
|
|
832
|
|
|||
|
Boeing Capital
|
44
|
|
44
|
|
|||
|
Other segment
|
(62
|
)
|
|
(58
|
)
|
||
|
Unallocated items and eliminations
|
(720
|
)
|
|
(509
|
)
|
||
|
Earnings from operations
|
1,542
|
|
1,528
|
|
|||
|
Other income, net
|
9
|
|
9
|
|
|||
|
Interest and debt expense
|
(92
|
)
|
(99
|
)
|
|||
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
1,459
|
|
1,438
|
|
|||
|
Income tax expense
|
(494
|
)
|
(332
|
)
|
|||
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
965
|
|
1,106
|
|
|||
|
Net gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net earnings
|
|
$965
|
|
|
$1,106
|
|
|
This information is an integral part of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note
17
for further segment results.
6
The Boeing Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note
1
– Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in this report have been prepared by management of The Boeing Company (herein referred to as “Boeing”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation are reflected in the interim financial statements. The results of operations for the period ended
March 31, 2014
are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, included in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Effective during the first quarter of 2014, certain programs previously reported in the
Boeing Military Aircraft
(
BMA
) segment were realigned to the
Global Services & Support
(
GS&S
) segment. See Note
17
. Business segment data for 2013 have been adjusted to reflect the realignment.
Use of Estimates
Management makes assumptions and estimates to prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Those assumptions and estimates directly affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Significant estimates for which changes in the near term are considered reasonably possible and that may have a material impact on the financial statements are disclosed in these Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contract accounting is used for development and production activities predominantly by
Defense, Space & Security
(
BDS
). Contract accounting involves a judgmental process of estimating total sales and costs for each contract resulting in the development of estimated cost of sales percentages. Changes in estimated revenues, cost of sales and the related effect on operating income are recognized using a cumulative catch-up adjustment which recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods based on a contract’s percent complete. For the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
, net favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments, including reach-forward losses, across all
BDS
contracts increased Earnings from operations by
$167
and
$105
and diluted earnings per share by
$0.15
and
$0.11
.
Note
2
– Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed using the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation method that determines earnings per share for common shares and participating securities. The undistributed earnings are allocated between common shares and participating securities as if all earnings had been distributed during the period. Participating securities and common shares have equal rights to undistributed earnings.
Basic earnings per share is calculated by taking net earnings, less earnings available to participating securities, divided by the basic weighted average common shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by taking net earnings, less earnings available to participating securities, divided by the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding.
7
The elements used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
|
(In millions - except per share amounts)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||
|
Net earnings
|
|
$965
|
|
|
$1,106
|
|
|
|
Less: earnings available to participating securities
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
|||
|
Net earnings available to common shareholders
|
|
$963
|
|
|
$1,103
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|||||||
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
745.0
|
|
763.3
|
|
|||
|
Less: participating securities
|
1.6
|
|
2.1
|
|
|||
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
|
743.4
|
|
761.2
|
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
|||||||
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
745.0
|
|
763.3
|
|
|||
|
Dilutive potential common shares
(1)
|
9.1
|
|
5.4
|
|
|||
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
754.1
|
|
768.7
|
|
|||
|
Less: participating securities
|
1.6
|
|
2.1
|
|
|||
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
752.5
|
|
766.6
|
|
|||
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
|
$1.30
|
|
|
$1.45
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
1.28
|
|
1.44
|
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Diluted
EPS
includes any dilutive impact of stock options, restricted stock units, performance-based restricted stock units and performance awards.
|
The following table includes the number of shares that may be dilutive potential common shares in the future. These shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was either antidilutive or the performance condition was not met.
|
(Shares in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||
|
Stock options
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
Performance awards
|
6.1
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
Performance-based restricted stock units
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
Note
3
– Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates were
33.9%
and
23.1%
for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
. The effective tax rate for the
first quarter
of
2014
is higher than the comparable prior year period primarily due to the U.S. research and development tax credit (research tax credit). The research tax credit was effective for 2013, but due to the expiration at the end of 2013, no tax benefit is recorded in 2014. Furthermore, in the first quarter of 2013, Congress retroactively reinstated the research tax credit for 2012, which reduced income tax expense by
$145
. If Congress extends the research tax credit there will be a favorable impact on our 2014 effective income tax rate.
8
Federal income tax audits have been settled for all years prior to 2007, as of March 31, 2014. On April 8, 2014, the Joint Committee on Taxation completed its review of the 2007-2008 tax years and as a result, a tax benefit of approximately
$115
will be recorded in the second quarter of 2014. The years 2009-2010 are currently being examined by the
Internal Revenue Service
(
IRS
). We are also subject to examination in major state and international jurisdictions for the 2001-2013 tax years. We believe appropriate provisions for all outstanding tax issues have been made for all jurisdictions and all open years.
Audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements are subject to significant uncertainty. It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months we will resolve the matters presently under consideration for the 2009-2010 tax years with the
IRS
. Depending on the timing and outcome of the audit settlement, unrecognized tax benefits that affect the effective tax rate could increase earnings by up to
$130
based on current estimates.
Note
4
– Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable as of
March 31, 2014
, includes
$112
of unbillable receivables on a long-term contract with
LightSquared, LLC
(
LightSquared
) related to the construction of
two
commercial satellites. One of the satellites has been delivered, and the other is substantially complete but remains in Boeing’s possession. On May 14, 2012,
LightSquared
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. We believe that our rights in the second satellite and related ground-segment assets are sufficient to protect the value of our receivables in the event
LightSquared
fails to make payments as contractually required or rejects its co
ntract with us. Given the uncertainties inherent in bankruptcy proceedings, it is reasonably possible that we could incur losses related to these receivables in connection with the
LightSquared
bankruptcy.
Note
5
– Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
||||
|
Long-term contracts in progress
|
|
$13,257
|
|
|
$12,608
|
|
|
|
Commercial aircraft programs
|
51,789
|
|
48,065
|
|
|||
|
Commercial spare parts, used aircraft, general stock materials and other
|
7,641
|
|
7,793
|
|
|||
|
Inventory before advances and progress billings
|
72,687
|
|
68,466
|
|
|||
|
Less advances and progress billings
|
(27,746
|
)
|
(25,554
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
$44,941
|
|
|
$42,912
|
|
|
Long-Term Contracts in Progress
Long-term contracts in progress includes Delta launch program inventory that is being sold at cost to
United Launch Alliance
(
ULA
) under an inventory supply agreement that terminates on March 31, 2021. At
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, the inventory balance, net of advances, was
$350
and
$425
. At
March 31, 2014
,
$333
of this inventory related to unsold launches. See Note
10
.
Capitalized precontract costs of
$826
and
$520
at
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, are included in inventories.
9
Commercial Aircraft Programs
At
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, commercial aircraft programs inventory included the following amounts related to the 787 program:
$30,246
and
$27,576
of work in process (including deferred production costs of
$23,123
and
$21,620
),
$2,303
and
$2,189
of supplier advances, and
$3,453
and
$3,377
of unamortized tooling and other non-recurring costs. At
March 31, 2014
,
$17,838
of 787 deferred production costs, unamortized tooling and other non-recurring costs are expected to be recovered from units included in the program accounting quantity that have firm orders and
$8,737
is expected to be recovered from units included in the program accounting quantity that represent expected future orders.
At
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, commercial aircraft programs inventory included the following amounts related to the 747 program:
$1,649
and
$1,554
of deferred production costs, net of previously recorded reach-forward losses, and
$552
and
$563
of unamortized tooling costs. At
March 31, 2014
,
$1,189
of 747 deferred production costs and unamortized tooling are expected to be recovered from units included in the program accounting quantity that have firm orders and
$1,012
is expected to be recovered from units included in the program accounting quantity that represent expected future orders.
Commercial aircraft programs inventory included amounts credited in cash or other consideration (early issue sales consideration) to airline customers totaling
$3,433
and
$3,465
at
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
.
Note
6
– Customer Financing
Customer financing primarily relates to the
Boeing Capital
(
BCC
) segment and consisted of the following:
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
||||
|
Financing receivables:
|
|||||||
|
Investment in sales-type/finance leases
|
|
$1,655
|
|
|
$1,699
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
482
|
|
587
|
|
|||
|
Operating lease equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $559 and $564
|
1,425
|
|
1,734
|
|
|||
|
Gross customer financing
|
3,562
|
|
4,020
|
|
|||
|
Less allowance for losses on receivables
|
(26
|
)
|
(49
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
$3,536
|
|
|
$3,971
|
|
|
We determine a receivable is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect amounts due according to the original contractual terms. At
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, we individually evaluated for impairment customer financing receivables of
$97
and
$95
and determined that none of these were impaired. We recorded no allowance for losses on these receivables as the collateral values exceed the carrying values of the receivables.
The adequacy of the allowance for losses is assessed quarterly. Three primary factors influencing the level of our allowance for losses on customer financing receivables are customer credit ratings, default rates and collateral values. We assign internal credit ratings for all customers and determine the creditworthiness of each customer based upon publicly available information and information obtained directly from our customers. Our rating categories are comparable to those used by the major credit rating agencies.
10
Our financing receivable balances by internal credit rating category are shown below.
|
Rating categories
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
|||
|
BBB
|
|
$1,065
|
|
|
$1,091
|
|
|
|
BB
|
50
|
|
58
|
|
|||
|
B
|
727
|
|
585
|
|
|||
|
CCC
|
198
|
|
457
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
97
|
|
95
|
|
|||
|
Total carrying value of financing receivables
|
|
$2,137
|
|
|
$2,286
|
|
|
At
March 31, 2014
, our allowance related to receivables with ratings of B and BBB to which we applied default rates that averaged
18%
and
2%
to the exposure associated with those receivables.
Customer Financing Exposure
Customer financing is collateralized by security in the related asset. The value of the collateral is closely tied to commercial airline performance and overall market conditions and may be subject to reduced valuation with market decline. Declines in collateral values are also a significant driver of our allowance for losses. Generally, out-of-production aircraft have experienced greater collateral value declines than in-production aircraft. Our customer financing portfolio is primarily collateralized by out-of-production aircraft. The majority of customer financing carrying values are concentrated in the following aircraft models:
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
||||
|
717 Aircraft ($438 and $444 accounted for as operating leases)
(1)
|
|
$1,647
|
|
|
$1,674
|
|
|
|
757 Aircraft ($396 and $402 accounted for as operating leases)
(1)
|
436
|
|
453
|
|
|||
|
MD-80 Aircraft (Accounted for as sales-type finance leases)
(1)
|
403
|
|
411
|
|
|||
|
MD-11 Aircraft (Accounted for as operating leases)
(1)
|
212
|
|
220
|
|
|||
|
767 Aircraft ($54 and $60 accounted for as operating leases)
|
206
|
|
207
|
|
|||
|
737 Aircraft ($133 and $138 accounted for as operating leases)
|
202
|
|
210
|
|
|||
|
747 Aircraft ($177 and $183 accounted for as operating leases)
|
177
|
|
286
|
|
|||
|
787 Aircraft (Accounted for as operating leases)
|
273
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Out-of-production aircraft.
|
11
Note
7
– Investments
Our investments, which are recorded in Short-term and other investments or Investments, consisted of the following:
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
||||
|
Time deposits
|
5,205
|
|
|
$6,090
|
|
||
|
Pledged money market funds
(1)
|
46
|
|
46
|
|
|||
|
Available-for-sale investments
|
11
|
|
8
|
|
|||
|
Equity method investments
(2)
|
1,165
|
|
1,164
|
|
|||
|
Restricted cash
(3)
|
30
|
|
33
|
|
|||
|
Other investments
|
33
|
|
33
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
$6,490
|
|
|
$7,374
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects amounts pledged in lieu of letters of credit as collateral in support of our workers’ compensation programs. These funds can become available within 30 days notice upon issuance of letters of credit.
|
|
(2)
|
Dividends received were
$59
and
$50
during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
.
|
|
(3)
|
Restricted to pay certain claims related to workers' compensation and life insurance premiums for certain employees.
|
Note
8
– Other Assets
Sea Launch
At
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, Other assets included
$356
of receivables related to our former investment in the Sea Launch venture which became payable by certain Sea Launch partners following Sea Launch’s bankruptcy filing in June 2009. The
$356
includes
$147
related to a payment made by us under a bank guarantee on behalf of Sea Launch and
$209
related to loans (partner loans) we made to Sea Launch. The net amounts owed to Boeing by each of the partners are as follows: S.P. Koroley Rocket and Space Corporation Energia of Russia –
$223
, PO Yuzhnoye Mashinostroitelny Zavod of Ukraine –
$89
and KB Yuzhnoye of Ukraine –
$44
.
Although each partner is contractually obligated to reimburse us for its share of the bank guarantee, the Russian and Ukrainian partners have raised defenses to enforcement and contested our claims. On October 19, 2009, we filed a Notice of Arbitration with the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce seeking reimbursement from the other Sea Launch partners of the
$147
bank guarantee payment. On October 7, 2010, the arbitrator ruled that the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter but did not resolve the merits of our claim. We filed a notice appealing the arbitrator’s ruling on January 11, 2011
.
On April 11, 2014, the appellate court entered a ruling that the decision of the arbitrator is not appealable. We intend to appeal the appellate court’s ruling with the Supreme Court of Sweden. On February 1, 2013, we filed an action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking reimbursement from the other Sea Launch partners of the
$147
bank guarantee payment and the
$209
partner loan obligations. A trial in the United States District Court for the Central District of California is scheduled to commence January 26, 2015. We believe the partners have the financial wherewithal to pay and intend to pursue vigorously all of our rights and remedies. In the event we are unable to secure reimbursement of
$147
related to our payment under the bank guarantee and
$209
related to partner loans made to Sea Launch, we could incur additional pre-tax charges of up to
$356
. Our current assessment as to the collectability of these receivables takes into account the recent political unrest involving Russia and Ukraine, although we will continue to monitor the situation.
12
Note
9
– Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental
The following table summarizes environmental remediation activity during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
.
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||
|
Beginning balance – January 1
|
|
$649
|
|
|
$710
|
|
|
|
Reductions for payments made
|
(19
|
)
|
(8
|
)
|
|||
|
Changes in estimates
|
16
|
|
5
|
|
|||
|
Ending balance – March 31
|
|
$646
|
|
|
$707
|
|
|
The liabilities recorded represent our best estimate or the low end of a range of reasonably possible costs expected to be incurred to remediate sites, including operation and maintenance over periods of up to 30 years. It is reasonably possible that we may incur charges that exceed these recorded amounts because of regulatory agency orders and directives, changes in laws and/or regulations, higher than expected costs and/or the discovery of new or additional contamination. As part of our estimating process, we develop a range of reasonably possible alternate scenarios which include the high end of a range of reasonably possible cost estimates for all remediation sites for which we have sufficient information based on our experience and existing laws and regulations. There are some potential remediation obligations where the costs of remediation cannot be reasonably estimated. At
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, the high end of the estimated range of reasonably possible remediation costs exceeded our recorded liabilities by
$923
and
$928
.
Product Warranties
The following table summarizes product warranty activity recorded during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
.
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||
|
Beginning balance – January 1
|
|
$1,570
|
|
|
$1,572
|
|
|
|
Additions for current year deliveries
|
138
|
|
63
|
|
|||
|
Reductions for payments made
|
(106
|
)
|
(129
|
)
|
|||
|
Changes in estimates
|
47
|
|
1
|
|
|||
|
Ending balance - March 31
|
|
$1,649
|
|
|
$1,507
|
|
|
Commercial Aircraft Commitments
In conjunction with signing definitive agreements for the sale of new aircraft (Sale Aircraft), we have entered into trade-in commitments with certain customers that give them the right to trade in used aircraft at a specified price upon the purchase of Sale Aircraft. The probability that trade-in commitments will be exercised is determined by using both quantitative information from valuation sources and qualitative information from other sources. The probability of exercise is assessed quarterly, or as events trigger a change, and takes into consideration the current economic and airline industry environments. Trade-in commitments, which can be terminated by mutual consent with the customer, may be exercised only during the period specified in the agreement, and require advance notice by the customer.
Trade-in commitment agreements at
March 31, 2014
have expiration dates from
2014
through
2023
. At
March 31, 2014
, and
December 31, 2013
total contractual trade-in commitments were
$1,862
and
$1,605
. As of
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, we estimated that it was probable we would be obligated to perform on certain of these commitments with net amounts payable to customers totaling
$477
and
$325
and the fair value of the related trade-in aircraft was
$477
and
$325
.
13
Financing Commitments
Financing commitments related to aircraft on order, including options and those proposed in sales campaigns, totaled
$17,599
and
$17,987
as of
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
. The estimated earliest potential funding dates for these commitments as of
March 31, 2014
are as follows:
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
April through December 2014
|
|
$1,655
|
|
|
2015
|
3,314
|
|
|
|
2016
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
2017
|
3,235
|
|
|
|
2018
|
1,643
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
4,226
|
|
|
|
|
$17,599
|
|
|
As of
March 31, 2014
, all of these financing commitments related to customers we believe have less than investment-grade credit. We have concluded that no reserve for future potential losses is required for these financing commitments based upon the terms, such as collateralization and interest rates, under which funding would be provided.
Standby Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds
We have entered into standby letters of credit and surety bonds with financial institutions primarily relating to the guarantee of our future performance on certain contracts. Contingent liabilities on outstanding letters of credit agreements and surety bonds aggregated approximately
$4,310
and
$4,376
as of
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
.
Commitments to ULA
We and Lockheed Martin Corporation have each committed to provide ULA with up to
$527
of additional capital contributions in the event ULA does not have sufficient funds to make a required payment to us under an inventory supply agreement. See Note
5
.
C-17
In September 2013, we decided to end production of C-17 aircraft in 2015. In April 2014, we announced that we anticipate ending production approximately three months earlier based on our decision to produce three fewer aircraft in 2015 than previously planned. As a result, during the three months ended March 31, 2014,
BDS
recorded
$48
to write off inventory and accrue termination liabilities to suppliers. At
March 31, 2014
, our backlog included
3
international orders for C-17 aircraft that are scheduled for delivery through mid-2014 and we have active sales campaigns for the remaining
11
unsold aircraft that we plan to produce. We are currently incurring costs and have made commitments to suppliers related to the unsold aircraft. We believe it is probable that we will recover costs related to the unsold aircraft from international customer orders. Should orders for the
11
unsold aircraft not materialize or should we decide to discontinue production of unsold aircraft, we could incur further charges to write-down inventory and/or record termination liabilities. At
March 31, 2014
, we had approximately
$705
of capitalized precontract costs and
$725
of potential termination liabilities to suppliers associated with the unsold aircraft.
14
F/A-18
At March 31, 2014, our backlog included
57
F/A-18 aircraft currently under contract with the U.S. Navy. In addition, the Fiscal Year 2013 and 2014 budgets include funding for an additional
44
aircraft. The President’s Fiscal Year 2015 budget request submitted in March 2014 did not include funding for additional F/A-18 aircraft. We are continuing to work with our U.S. customer as well as international customers to secure additional orders. The orders in backlog, combined with anticipated orders for the 44 aircraft currently funded, would complete production in 2016. Should additional orders not materialize, it is reasonably possible that we will decide in the next twelve months to end production of the F/A-18 at a future date. We are still evaluating the full financial impact of a potential production shutdown, including any recovery that may be available from the U.S. government.
United States Government Defense Environment Overview
U.S. government appropriation levels remain subject to significant uncertainty. In August 2011, the Budget Control Act (The Act) established limits on U.S. government discretionary spending, including a reduction of defense spending by approximately $490 billion between the 2012 and 2021 U.S. government fiscal years. The Act also provided that the defense budget would face “sequestration” cuts of up to an additional $500 billion during that same period to the extent that discretionary spending limits are exceeded. The impact of sequestration cuts was reduced with respect to FY2014 and FY2015 following the enactment of The Bipartisan Budget Act in December 2013. However, significant uncertainty remains with respect to overall levels of defense spending and it is likely that U.S. government discretionary spending levels will continue to be subject to significant pressure, including risk of future sequestration cuts.
Significant uncertainty also continues with respect to program-level appropriations for the U.S. Department of Defense (
U.S. DoD
) and other government agencies, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, within the overall budgetary framework described above. Future budget cuts, including cuts mandated by sequestration, or future procurement decisions associated with the appropriations process could result in reductions, cancellations and/or delays of existing contracts or programs. Any of these impacts could have a material effect on the results of the Company's operations, financial position and/or cash flows.
In addition to the risks described above, if Congress is unable to pass appropriations bills in a timely manner, a government shutdown could result which could have impacts above and beyond those resulting from budget cuts or sequestration impacts. For example, requirements to furlough employees in the
U.S. DoD
or other government agencies could result in payment delays, impair our ability to perform work on existing contracts, and/or negatively impact future orders.
BDS Fixed-Price Development Contracts
Fixed-price development work is inherently uncertain and subject to significant variability in estimates of the cost and time required to complete the work. BDS fixed-price contracts with significant development work include
Airborne Early Warning and Control
, India P-8I, Saudi Arabia F-15, USAF KC-46A Tanker and commercial and military satellites. The operational and technical complexities of these contracts create financial risk, which could trigger termination provisions, order cancellations or other financially significant exposure. Changes to cost and revenue estimates could also result in lower margins or a material charge for reach-forward losses in 2014.
Recoverable Costs on Government Contracts
Our final incurred costs for each year are subject to audit and review for allowability by the U.S. government, which can result in payment demands related to costs they believe should be disallowed. We work with the U.S government to assess the merits of claims and where appropriate reserve for amounts disputed. If we are unable to satisfactorily resolve disputed costs, we could be required to record an earnings charge and/or provide refunds to the U.S. government.
15
Russia/Ukraine
We are monitoring recent political unrest involving Russia and Ukraine, where we and some of our suppliers source titanium products and/or have operations. A number of our commercial customers also have operations in Russia and Ukraine. To date, we have not experienced any disruptions to production or deliveries. Should suppliers or customers experience disruption, our production and/or deliveries could be materially impacted.
747 and 787 Commercial Airplane Programs
The development and initial production of new commercial airplanes and new commercial airplane derivatives, which include the 747 and 787, entail significant commitments to customers and suppliers as well as substantial investments in working capital, infrastructure and research and development. The 747 and 787 programs had gross margins that were breakeven or near breakeven during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
.
Continued weakness in the air cargo market and lower-than-expected demand for large commercial passenger aircraft have resulted in pricing pressures and fewer 747 orders than anticipated. We continue to have a number of unsold 747 production positions. If market and production risks cannot be mitigated, the program could face a reach-forward loss that may be material.
The combination of production challenges, change incorporation, schedule delays and customer and supplier impacts has created significant pressure on 787 program profitability. If risks related to this program, including risks associated with planned production rate increases, or introducing the 787-9 and 787-10 derivatives as scheduled cannot be mitigated, the program could face additional customer claims and/or supplier assertions, as well as a reach-forward loss that may be material.
Note
10
– Arrangements with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
We enter into arrangements with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business, primarily in the form of guarantees.
The following table provides quantitative data regarding our third party guarantees. The maximum potential payments represent a “worst-case scenario,” and do not necessarily reflect amounts that we expect to pay. Estimated proceeds from collateral and recourse represent the anticipated values of assets we could liquidate or receive from other parties to offset our payments under guarantees. The carrying amount of liabilities represents the amount included in Accrued liabilities.
|
|
Maximum
Potential Payments
|
Estimated Proceeds from
Collateral/Recourse
|
Carrying Amount of
Liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
|||||||||
|
Contingent repurchase commitments
|
|
$1,830
|
|
|
$1,872
|
|
|
$1,813
|
|
|
$1,871
|
|
|
$5
|
|
|
$5
|
|
||
|
Indemnifications to ULA:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contributed Delta program launch inventory
|
125
|
|
127
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Contract pricing
|
261
|
|
261
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Other Delta contracts
|
226
|
|
227
|
|
8
|
|
8
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Other indemnifications
|
96
|
|
106
|
|
27
|
|
28
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Credit guarantees
|
30
|
|
35
|
|
27
|
|
27
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
||||||||
Contingent Repurchase Commitments
The repurchase price specified in contingent repurchase commitments is generally lower than the expected fair value at the specified repurchase date. Estimated proceeds from collateral/recourse in the table above represent the lower of the contracted repurchase price or the expected fair value of each aircraft at the specified repurchase date.
16
Indemnifications to ULA
In 2006, we agreed to indemnify ULA through December 31, 2020 against potential non-recoverability and non-allowability of
$1,360
of Boeing Delta launch program inventory included in contributed assets plus
$1,860
of inventory subject to an inventory supply agreement which ends on March 31, 2021. Since inception, ULA has consumed
$1,235
of the
$1,360
of inventory that was contributed by us and has yet to consume
$125
. ULA has made advance payments of
$1,440
to us and we have recorded revenues and cost of sales of
$1,104
under the inventory supply agreement through
March 31, 2014
.
We agreed to indemnify ULA against potential losses that ULA may incur in the event ULA is unable to obtain certain additional contract pricing from the U.S. Air Force (USAF) for
four
satellite missions. We believe ULA is entitled to additional contract pricing. In December 2008, ULA submitted a claim to the USAF to re-price the contract value for two satellite missions. In March 2009, the USAF issued a denial of that claim. In June 2009, ULA filed a notice of appeal, and in October 2009, ULA filed a complaint before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) for a contract adjustment for the price of the two satellite missions. In September 2009, the USAF exercised its option for a third satellite mission. During the third quarter of 2010, ULA submitted a claim to the USAF to re-price the contract value of the third mission. The USAF did not exercise an option for a fourth mission prior to the expiration of the contract. In March 2011, ULA filed a notice of appeal before the ASBCA, seeking to re-price the third mission. On November 20, 2013, the ASBCA denied the USAF motions in large part, leaving three of four ULA counts, and its overall claims, substantially intact. The trial before the ASBCA concluded on December 20, 2013. The parties will complete post-trial briefing by May 2014. The Board will likely issue a ruling thereafter, but there is no scheduled date or official deadline for its decision. If ULA is ultimately unsuccessful in obtaining additional pricing, we may be responsible for a portion of the shortfall and may record up to
$278
in pre-tax losses associated with the
three
missions, representing up to
$261
for the indemnification payment and up to
$17
for our portion of additional contract losses incurred by ULA.
Potential payments for Other Delta contracts include
$85
related to deferred support costs. In June 2011, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) notified ULA that it had determined that
$271
of deferred support costs are not recoverable under government contracts. In December 2011, the DCMA notified ULA of the potential non-recoverability of an additional
$114
of deferred production costs. The DCMA has not yet issued a final decision related to the recoverability of the
$114
. ULA and Boeing believe that all costs are recoverable and in November 2011, ULA filed a certified claim with the USAF for collection of deferred support and production costs. The USAF issued a final decision denying ULA’s certified claim in May 2012. On June 14, 2012, Boeing and ULA filed a suit in the Court of Federal Claims seeking recovery of the deferred support and production costs from the U.S. government. On November 9, 2012, the U.S. government filed an answer to our claim and asserted a counterclaim for credits that it alleges were offset by deferred support cost invoices. We believe that the U.S. government’s counterclaim is without merit, and have filed an answer challenging it on multiple grounds. The litigation is in the discovery phase, and the Court has not yet set a trial date. If, contrary to our belief, it is determined that some or all of the deferred support or production costs are not recoverable, we could be required to record pre-tax losses and make indemnification payments to ULA for up to
$317
of the costs questioned by the DCMA.
17
Other Indemnifications
As part of the 2004 sale agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation related to the sale of
BCC
's Commercial Financial Services business, BCC is involved in a loss sharing arrangement for losses on transferred portfolio assets, such as asset sales, provisions for loss or asset impairment charges offset by gains from asset sales. At
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, our maximum future cash exposure to losses associated with the loss sharing arrangement was
$96
and
$106
and our accrued liability under the loss sharing arrangement was
$27
and
$28
.
In conjunction with our sales of Electron Dynamic Devices, Inc. and Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power businesses and our Commercial Airplanes facilities in Wichita, Kansas and Tulsa and McAlester, Oklahoma, we agreed to indemnify, for an indefinite period, the buyers for costs relating to pre-closing environmental conditions and certain other items. It is impossible to assess the potential number of future claims that may be asserted under these indemnifications, nor the amounts thereof (if any). As a result, we cannot estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments under these indemnities and therefore, no liability has been recorded. To the extent that claims have been made under these indemnities and/or are probable and reasonably estimable, liabilities associated with these indemnities are included in the environmental liability disclosure in Note
9
.
Credit Guarantees
We have issued credit guarantees, principally to facilitate the sale and/or financing of commercial aircraft. Under these arrangements, we are obligated to make payments to a guaranteed party in the event that lease or loan payments are not made by the original lessee or debtor or certain specified services are not performed. A substantial portion of these guarantees has been extended on behalf of original lessees or debtors with less than investment-grade credit. Our commercial aircraft credit guarantees are collateralized by the underlying commercial aircraft and certain other assets. Current outstanding credit guarantees expire within the next
seven
years.
Note
11
– Postretirement Plans
The components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
|
Pension
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||||||
|
Service cost
|
|
$414
|
|
|
$473
|
|
|
$32
|
|
|
$37
|
|
|||
|
Interest cost
|
784
|
|
731
|
|
72
|
|
67
|
|
|||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(1,041
|
)
|
(969
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
45
|
|
49
|
|
(36
|
)
|
(45
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
261
|
|
569
|
|
2
|
|
24
|
|
|||||||
|
Settlement/curtailment/other losses
|
338
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$801
|
|
|
$873
|
|
|
$68
|
|
|
$81
|
|
|||
|
Net periodic benefit cost included in Earnings from operations
|
|
$1,035
|
|
|
$791
|
|
|
$71
|
|
|
$91
|
|
|||
In the first quarter of 2014, we announced changes to our nonunion and certain union retirement plans whereby approximately
100,000
employees will transition in 2016 to a company-funded defined contribution retirement savings plan in lieu of participation in defined benefit pension plans. The defined benefit pension plan changes resulted in charges of
$334
in the first quarter of 2014, primarily for pension curtailment costs. In addition, we remeasured pension assets and benefit obligations for the affected pension plans. These remeasurements resulted in a net actuarial gain of
$966
which is included in Other Comprehensive Income. The
$966
reflects a gain of
$1,988
resulting from benefit plan changes that was partially offset by net actuarial losses of
$1,022
primarily driven by a reduction in the discount rate from approximately
4.8%
at December 31, 2013 to approximately
4.5%
as of the remeasurement dates.
18
Note
12
– Share-Based Compensation and Other Compensation Arrangements
Restricted Stock Units
On
February 24, 2014
, we granted to our executives
695,651
restricted stock units
(
RSU
s) as part of our long-term incentive program with a grant date fair value of
$129.58
per share. The
RSU
s granted under this program will vest and settle in common stock (on a one-for-one basis) on the third anniversary of the grant date.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
On
February 24, 2014
, we granted to our executives
662,215
performance-based restricted stock units
(
PBRSU
s) as part of our long-term incentive program with a grant date fair value of
$136.12
per share. The
PBRSU
s granted under this program will vest and settle in common stock (on a one-for-one basis) on the third anniversary of the grant date based on the Company’s total shareholder return as compared to a group of peer companies. The award payout can range from
0%
to
200%
of the original
PBRSU
award amount. Compensation expense for the award is recognized over the
three
-year performance period based upon the fair value determined at grant date using a Monte-Carlo simulation model.
Performance Awards
On
February 24, 2014
, we granted performance awards to our executives with the payout based on the achievement of financial goals for the
three
-year period ending
December 31, 2016
. At
March 31, 2014
, the minimum payout amount is
$0
and the maximum amount we could be required to pay out is
$359
.
Note
13
– Shareholders' Equity
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Changes in Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) (AOCI) by component for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
were as follows:
|
Currency Translation Adjustments
|
|
Unrealized Gains and Losses on Certain Investments
|
|
Unrealized Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments
|
|
Defined Benefit Pension Plans & Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|
Total
(1)
|
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at January 1, 2013
|
|
$214
|
|
|
($8
|
)
|
|
$86
|
|
|
($17,708
|
)
|
|
($17,416
|
)
|
||||
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(26
|
)
|
32
|
|
(17
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
|
|
2
|
|
390
|
|
(2)
|
392
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net current period Other comprehensive income/(loss)
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
422
|
|
375
|
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at March 31, 2013
|
|
$191
|
|
|
($8
|
)
|
|
$62
|
|
|
($17,286
|
)
|
|
($17,041
|
)
|
||||
|
Balance at January 1, 2014
|
|
$150
|
|
|
($8
|
)
|
|
($6
|
)
|
|
($10,030
|
)
|
|
($9,894
|
)
|
||||
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications
|
17
|
|
2
|
|
(11
|
)
|
620
|
|
628
|
|
|||||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
|
|
5
|
|
378
|
|
(2)
|
383
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net current period Other comprehensive income/(loss)
|
17
|
|
2
|
|
(6
|
)
|
998
|
|
1,011
|
|
|||||||||
|
Balance at March 31, 2014
|
|
$167
|
|
|
($6
|
)
|
|
($12
|
)
|
|
($9,032
|
)
|
|
($8,883
|
)
|
||||
(1)
Net of tax.
|
(2)
|
Primarily relates to settlements, curtailments and amortization of actuarial gains/losses for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
totaling
$372
and
$387
(net of tax of
($207)
and
($220)
) which is included in the net periodic pension cost of which a portion is allocated to production as inventoried costs.
|
19
Note
14
– Derivative Financial Instruments
Cash Flow Hedges
Our cash flow hedges include foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency option contracts, commodity swaps, and commodity purchase contracts. We use foreign currency forward and option contracts to manage currency risk associated with certain transactions, specifically forecasted sales and purchases made in foreign currencies. Our foreign currency contracts hedge forecasted transactions principally occurring within five years in the future, with certain contracts hedging transactions through
2023
. We use commodity derivatives, such as swaps and fixed-price purchase commitments to hedge against potentially unfavorable price changes for items used in production. Our commodity contracts hedge forecasted transactions through
2017
.
Fair Value Hedges
Interest rate swaps under which we agree to pay variable rates of interest are designated as fair value hedges of fixed-rate debt. The net change in fair value of the derivatives and the hedged items is reported in Boeing Capital interest expense.
Derivative Instruments Not Receiving Hedge Accounting Treatment
We also hold certain derivative instruments, primarily foreign currency forward contracts, for risk management purposes that are not receiving hedge accounting treatment.
Notional Amounts and Fair Values
The notional amounts and fair values of derivative instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position were as follows:
|
|
Notional amounts
(1)
|
Other assets
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
||||||
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$2,326
|
|
|
$2,524
|
|
|
$114
|
|
|
$122
|
|
|
($77
|
)
|
|
($64
|
)
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
313
|
|
313
|
|
13
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
50
|
|
72
|
|
3
|
|
2
|
|
(33
|
)
|
(39
|
)
|
||||||
|
Derivatives not receiving hedge accounting treatment:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
284
|
|
259
|
|
14
|
|
12
|
|
(30
|
)
|
(35
|
)
|
||||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
7
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total derivatives
|
|
$2,980
|
|
|
$3,177
|
|
144
|
|
149
|
|
(143
|
)
|
(142
|
)
|
||||
|
Netting arrangements
|
(56
|
)
|
(63
|
)
|
56
|
|
63
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net recorded balance
|
|
$88
|
|
|
$86
|
|
|
($87
|
)
|
|
($79
|
)
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
Notional amounts represent the gross contract/notional amount of the derivatives outstanding.
|
20
Gains/(losses) associated with our cash flow and undesignated hedging transactions and their effect on Other comprehensive income/(loss) and Net earnings were as follows:
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Effective portion recognized in Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of taxes:
|
|||||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
($12
|
)
|
|
($26
|
)
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
1
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Effective portion reclassified out of Accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings, net of taxes:
|
|||||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
(2
|
)
|
3
|
|
|||
|
Commodity contracts
|
(3
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
|||
|
Forward points recognized in Other income, net:
|
|||||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
7
|
|
8
|
|
|||
|
Undesignated derivatives recognized in Other income, net:
|
|||||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
(4
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
|||
Based on our portfolio of cash flow hedges, we expect to reclassify losses of
$11
(pre-tax) out of Accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings during the next 12 months. Ineffectiveness related to our hedges recognized in Other income was insignificant for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
.
We have derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features. For foreign exchange contracts with original maturities of at least five years, our derivative counterparties could require settlement if we default on our five-year credit facility. For commodity contracts, our counterparties could require collateral posted in an amount determined by our credit ratings. The fair value of foreign exchange and commodity contracts that have credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position at
March 31, 2014
was
$10
. At
March 31, 2014
, there was no collateral posted related to our derivatives.
Note
15
– Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 refers to fair values determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 refers to fair values estimated using significant other observable inputs and Level 3 includes fair values estimated using significant unobservable inputs.
|
March 31, 2014
|
December 31, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Money market funds
|
|
$2,101
|
|
|
$2,101
|
|
|
$3,783
|
|
|
$3,783
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Available-for-sale investments
|
11
|
|
9
|
|
|
$2
|
|
8
|
|
6
|
|
|
$2
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Derivatives
|
88
|
|
|
$88
|
|
86
|
|
|
$86
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
|
$2,200
|
|
|
$2,110
|
|
|
$88
|
|
|
$2
|
|
|
$3,877
|
|
|
$3,789
|
|
|
$86
|
|
|
$2
|
|
|||||||
|
Liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Derivatives
|
|
($87
|
)
|
|
($87
|
)
|
|
($79
|
)
|
|
($79
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
|
($87
|
)
|
|
|
($87
|
)
|
|
|
($79
|
)
|
|
|
($79
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||
21
Money market funds and available-for-sale equity securities are valued using a market approach based on the quoted market prices of identical instruments. Available-for-sale debt investments are primarily valued using an income approach based on benchmark yields, reported trades and broker/dealer quotes.
Derivatives include foreign currency, commodity and interest rate contracts. Our foreign currency forward contracts are valued using an income approach based on the present value of the forward rate less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount. Commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the present value of the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount. The fair value of our interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve.
Certain assets have been measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The following table presents the nonrecurring losses recognized for the
three months ended March 31
and the fair value and asset classification of the related assets as of the impairment date:
|
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Total
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Total
Losses
|
|
||||||||
|
Operating lease equipment
|
|
$27
|
|
|
($6
|
)
|
|
$28
|
|
|
($21
|
)
|
|||
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
2
|
|
(10
|
)
|
6
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total
|
|
$29
|
|
|
($16
|
)
|
|
$34
|
|
|
($26
|
)
|
|||
The fair value of the impaired operating lease equipment is derived by calculating a median collateral value from a consistent group of third party aircraft value publications. The values provided by the third party aircraft publications are derived from their knowledge of market trades and other market factors. Management reviews the publications quarterly to assess the continued appropriateness and consistency with market trends. Under certain circumstances, we adjust values based on the attributes and condition of the specific aircraft or equipment, usually when the features or use of the aircraft vary significantly from the more generic aircraft attributes covered by third party publications, or on the expected net sales price for the aircraft. Property, plant and equipment was primarily valued using an income approach based on the discounted cash flows associated with the underlying assets.
For Level 3 assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
, the following table presents the fair value of those assets as of the measurement date, valuation techniques and related unobservable inputs of those assets.
|
Fair
Value
|
Valuation
Technique(s)
|
Unobservable Input
|
Range
Median or Average
|
||||
|
Operating lease equipment
|
$27
|
Market approach
|
Aircraft value publications
|
$17 - $42
(1)
Median $32
|
|||
|
Aircraft condition adjustments
|
($5) - $0
(2)
Net ($5)
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
The range represents the sum of the highest and lowest values for all aircraft subject to fair value measurement, according to the third party aircraft valuation publications that we use in our valuation process.
|
|
(2)
|
The negative amount represents the sum for all aircraft subject to fair value measurement, of all downward adjustments based on consideration of individual aircraft attributes and condition. The positive amount represents the sum of all such upward adjustments.
|
22
Fair Value Disclosures
The fair values and related carrying values of financial instruments that are not required to be remeasured at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position were as follows:
|
March 31, 2014
|
|||||||||||
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Total Fair
Value
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||||||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$7,341
|
|
|
$7,418
|
|
|
$7,418
|
|
||
|
Notes receivable, net
|
478
|
|
517
|
|
517
|
|
|||||
|
Liabilities
|
|||||||||||
|
Debt, excluding capital lease obligations
|
(8,796
|
)
|
(10,402
|
)
|
(10,402
|
)
|
|
||||
|
December 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Total Fair
Value
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||||||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$6,546
|
|
|
$6,525
|
|
|
$6,525
|
|
||
|
Notes receivable, net
|
572
|
|
622
|
|
622
|
|
|||||
|
Liabilities
|
|||||||||||
|
Debt, excluding capital lease obligations
|
(9,483
|
)
|
(10,897
|
)
|
(10,897
|
)
|
|
||||
The fair value of Accounts receivable is based on current market rates for loans of the same risk and maturities. The fair values of our variable rate notes receivable that reprice frequently approximate their carrying amounts. The fair values of fixed rate notes receivable are estimated with discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates currently offered on loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The fair value of our debt that is traded in the secondary market is classified as Level 2 and is based on current market yields. For our debt that is not traded in the secondary market, the fair value is classified as Level 2 and is based on our indicative borrowing cost derived from dealer quotes or discounted cash flows. The fair value of our debt classified as Level 3 is based on the median of the underlying collateral value as described above. With regard to other financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of our indemnifications and financing commitments because the amount and timing of those arrangements are uncertain. Items not included in the above disclosures include cash, restricted cash, time deposits and other deposits, commercial paper, money market funds, Accounts payable and long-term payables. The carrying values of those items, as reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, approximate their fair value at
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
. The fair value of assets and liabilities whose carrying value approximates fair value is determined using Level 2 inputs, with the exception of cash (Level 1).
Note
16
– Legal Proceedings
Various legal proceedings, claims and investigations related to products, contracts, employment and other matters are pending against us. Potentially material contingencies are discussed below.
We are subject to various U.S. government investigations, from which civil, criminal or administrative proceedings could result or have resulted in the past. Such proceedings involve or could involve claims by the government for fines, penalties, compensatory and treble damages, restitution and/or forfeitures. Under government regulations, a company, or one or more of its operating divisions or subdivisions, can also be suspended or debarred from government contracts, or lose its export privileges, based on the results of investigations. We believe, based upon current information, that the outcome of any such government disputes and investigations will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, except as set forth below. Where it is reasonably possible that we will incur losses in excess of
23
recorded amounts in connection with any of the matters set forth below, we will disclose either the amount or range of reasonably possible losses in excess of such amounts or, where no such amount or range can be reasonably estimated, the reasons why no such estimate can be made.
Employment, Labor and Benefits Litigation
In connection with the 2005 sale of our former Wichita facility to Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. (Spirit), certain individuals not hired by Spirit alleged that Spirit’s hiring decisions following the sale were tainted by age discrimination, violated the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act
(
ERISA
), violated our collective bargaining agreements, and constituted retaliation. The case was brought in 2006 as a class action on behalf of individuals not hired by Spirit. In 2012, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's 2010 summary judgment in favor of Boein
g and Spirit on all class action claims, but the parties were not precluded from making claims on an individual basis. Claims with respect to
twenty-six
additional individuals were dismissed during the first quarter of 2014. As of
March 31, 2014
,
sixty-two
individual claims related to this matter were pending. Spirit has agreed to indemnify Boeing for any and all losses. We do not expect to incur any losses given the current status of this matter.
Also related to the 2005 sale of the former Wichita facility, on February 16, 2007, an action entitled Harkness et al. v. The Boeing Company et al. was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, alleging collective bargaining agreement breaches and
ERISA
violations in connection with alleged failures to provide benefits to certain former employees of the Wichita facility. On December 11, 2012 the court denied plaintiffs
’
motion for summary judgment and granted Boeing
’
s motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs
’
claim that amendment of The Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan violated the IAM collective bargaining agreement, as well as individual
ERISA
§
510 claims for interference with benefits. The court denied Boeing
’
s motion for all other claims. The parties are conducting additional discovery in anticipation of further court proceedings, which have not yet been scheduled. We believe that Spirit is obligated to indemnify Boeing for any and all losses in this matter, although to date Spirit has acknowledged a limited indemnification obligation. We currently estimate that the putative class includes up to approximately
2,000
former Wichita employees. We cannot reasonably estimate the range of loss, if any, that may result from this matter given the current procedural status of the litigation.
On October 13, 2006, we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. Plaintiffs, seeking to represent a class of similarly situated participants and beneficiaries in The Boeing Company Voluntary Investment Plan (the VIP), alleged that fees and expenses incurred by the VIP were and are unreasonable and excessive, not incurred solely for the benefit of the VIP and its participants, and were undisclosed to participants. The plaintiffs further alleged that defendants breached their fiduciary duties in violation of §502(a)(2) of
ERISA
, and sought injunctive and equitable relief pursuant to §502(a)(3) of
ERISA
. During the first quarter of 2010, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay of trial proceedings in the district court pending resolution of an appeal made by Boeing in 2008 to the case’s class certification order. On January 21, 2011, the Seventh Circuit reversed the district court’s class certification order and decertified the class. The Seventh Circuit remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings. On September 19, 2013, the district court granted plaintiffs
’
motion for class certification. On October 3, 2013, Boeing filed a petition for review of the class certification order with the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which was denied by the Seventh Circuit on November 26, 2013. Summary judgment briefs were filed in the district court on January 6, 2014, and plaintiffs’ opposition briefs were filed on February 10, 2014. We cannot reasonably estimate the range of loss, if any, that may result from this matter given the current procedural status of the litigation.
24
Note
17
– Segment Information
Effective during the first quarter of 2014, certain programs were realigned among
BDS
segments. The BMA aircraft programs
Airborne Warning and Control Systems
and
Airborne Early Warning and Control
and the F-22 Modernization program were realigned from
BMA
to
GS&S
. Business segment data for 2013 have been adjusted to reflect the realignment.
Our primary profitability measurements to review a segment’s operating results are Earnings from operations and operating margins. See page
6
for a Summary of Business Segment Data, which is an integral part of this note.
Intersegment revenues, eliminated in Unallocated items and eliminations, are shown in the following table.
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||||
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||
|
Commercial Airplanes
|
|
$274
|
|
|
$195
|
|
|
|
Boeing Capital
|
7
|
|
9
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
$281
|
|
|
$204
|
|
|
Unallocated Items and Eliminations
Unallocated items and eliminations includes costs not attributable to business segments as well as intercompany profit eliminations. We generally allocate costs to business segments based on the U.S. federal cost accounting standards. Components of Unallocated items and eliminations are shown in the following table.
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Share-based plans
|
|
($24
|
)
|
|
($31
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
7
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|||
|
Capitalized interest
|
(18
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
|||
|
Eliminations and other
|
(132
|
)
|
(66
|
)
|
|||
|
Sub-total
|
(167
|
)
|
(170
|
)
|
|||
|
Pension
|
(576
|
)
|
(358
|
)
|
|||
|
Postretirement
|
23
|
|
19
|
|
|||
|
Pension and Postretirement
|
(553
|
)
|
(339
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
($720
|
)
|
|
($509
|
)
|
|
Unallocated Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Expense
Unallocated pension and other postretirement benefit expense represent the portion of pension and other postretirement benefit costs that are not recognized by business segments for segment reporting purposes. Pension costs, comprising
GAAP
service and prior service costs, are allocated to Commercial Airplanes. Pension costs are allocated to
BDS
using
U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards
(
CAS
), which employ different actuarial assumptions and accounting conventions than
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
(
GAAP
). These costs are allocable to government contracts. Other postretirement benefit costs are allocated to business segments based on
CAS
, which is generally based on benefits paid.
25
Assets
Segment assets are summarized in the table below:
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
||||
|
Commercial Airplanes
|
|
$52,077
|
|
|
$49,520
|
|
|
|
Defense, Space & Security:
|
|||||||
|
Boeing Military Aircraft
|
6,429
|
|
5,872
|
|
|||
|
Network & Space Systems
|
6,382
|
|
6,450
|
|
|||
|
Global Services & Support
|
4,924
|
|
5,040
|
|
|||
|
Total Defense, Space & Security
|
17,735
|
|
17,362
|
|
|||
|
Boeing Capital
|
3,502
|
|
3,914
|
|
|||
|
Other segment
|
1,234
|
|
1,208
|
|
|||
|
Unallocated items and eliminations
|
17,027
|
|
20,659
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
$91,575
|
|
|
$92,663
|
|
|
Assets included in Unallocated items and eliminations primarily consist of Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term and other investments, Deferred tax assets, capitalized interest and assets held by
SSG
as well as intercompany eliminations.
26
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
The Boeing Company
Chicago, Illinois
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial position of The Boeing Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
March 31, 2014
, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows and equity for the
three
-month periods ended
March 31, 2014
and
2013
. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2013
, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 14, 2014, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial position as of
December 31, 2013
is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of financial position from which it has been derived.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
April 23, 2014
27
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
|
|
This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “projects,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “targets,” “anticipates” and similar expressions are used to identify these forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements relating to our future financial condition and operating results, as well as any other statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact.
|
|
|
Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions, which may not prove to be accurate. These statements are not guarantees and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Many factors could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from these forward-looking statements. Among these factors are risks related to:
|
|
|
(1)
|
general conditions in the economy and our industry, including those due to regulatory changes;
|
|
(2)
|
our reliance on our commercial airline customers;
|
|
(3)
|
the overall health of our aircraft production system, planned production rate increases across multiple commercial airline programs, our commercial development and derivative aircraft programs, and our aircraft being subject to stringent performance and reliability standards;
|
|
(4)
|
changing budget and appropriation levels and acquisition priorities of the U.S. government;
|
|
(5)
|
our dependence on U.S. government contracts;
|
|
(6)
|
our reliance on fixed-price contracts;
|
|
(7)
|
our reliance on cost-type contracts;
|
|
(8)
|
uncertainties concerning contracts that include in-orbit incentive payments;
|
|
(9)
|
our dependence on our subcontractors and suppliers as well as the availability of raw materials;
|
|
(10)
|
changes in accounting estimates;
|
|
(11)
|
changes in the competitive landscape in our markets;
|
|
(12)
|
our non-U.S. operations, including sales to non-U.S. customers;
|
|
(13)
|
potential adverse developments in new or pending litigation and/or government investigations;
|
|
(14)
|
customer and aircraft concentration in Boeing Capital’s customer financing portfolio;
|
|
(15)
|
changes in our ability to obtain debt on commercially reasonable terms and at competitive rates in order to fund our operations and contractual commitments;
|
|
(16)
|
realizing the anticipated benefits of mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances or divestitures;
|
|
(17)
|
the adequacy of our insurance coverage to cover significant risk exposures;
|
28
|
(18)
|
potential business disruptions, including those related to physical security threats, information technology or cyber attacks or natural disasters;
|
|
(19)
|
work stoppages or other labor disruptions;
|
|
(20)
|
significant changes in discount rates and actual investment return on pension assets;
|
|
(21)
|
potential environmental liabilities; and
|
|
(22)
|
threats to the security of our or our customers’ information.
|
|
Additional information concerning these and other factors can be found in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the “Risk Factors” on pages 6 through 15 of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Notes 9, 10, and 16 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. Any forward-looking information speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
|
|
29
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Consolidated Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Earnings From Operations and Core Operating Earnings (Non-GAAP)
The following table summarizes key indicators of consolidated results of operations:
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$20,465
|
|
|
$18,893
|
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|||||||
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$1,542
|
|
|
$1,528
|
|
|
|
Operating margins
|
7.5
|
%
|
8.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Effective income tax rate
|
33.9
|
%
|
23.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Net earnings
|
|
$965
|
|
|
$1,106
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$1.28
|
|
|
$1.44
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP
(1)
|
|||||||
|
Core operating earnings
|
|
$2,095
|
|
|
$1,867
|
|
|
|
Core operating margin
|
10.2
|
%
|
9.9
|
%
|
|||
|
Core earnings per share
|
|
$1.76
|
|
|
$1.73
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
These measures exclude certain components of pension and other postretirement benefit expense. See page
46
for important information about these non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures.
|
Revenues
The following table summarizes Revenues:
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Commercial Airplanes
|
|
$12,737
|
|
|
$10,690
|
|
|
|
Defense, Space & Security
|
7,633
|
|
8,110
|
|
|||
|
Boeing Capital
|
82
|
|
105
|
|
|||
|
Other segment
|
20
|
|
27
|
|
|||
|
Unallocated items and eliminations
|
(7
|
)
|
(39
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
$20,465
|
|
|
$18,893
|
|
|
Revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$1,572 million
or
8%
, compared with the same period in
2013
. Commercial Airplanes revenues
increased
by
$2,047 million
or
19%
due to higher airplane deliveries
.
Defense, Space & Security
(
BDS
) revenues
decreased
by
$477 million
due to lower revenues in the
Boeing Military Aircraft
(
BMA
) and
Network & Space Systems
(
N&SS
) segments, partially offset by higher revenues in the
Global Services & Support
(
GS&S
) segment.
30
Earnings From Operations
The following table summarizes Earnings from operations:
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Commercial Airplanes
|
|
$1,502
|
|
|
$1,219
|
|
|
|
Defense, Space & Security
|
778
|
|
832
|
|
|||
|
Boeing Capital
|
44
|
|
44
|
|
|||
|
Other segment
|
(62
|
)
|
(58
|
)
|
|||
|
Unallocated pension and other postretirement benefit expense
|
(553
|
)
|
(339
|
)
|
|||
|
Other unallocated items and eliminations
|
(167
|
)
|
(170
|
)
|
|||
|
Earnings from operations (GAAP)
|
|
$1,542
|
|
|
$1,528
|
|
|
|
Unallocated pension and other postretirement benefit expense
|
553
|
|
339
|
|
|||
|
Core operating earnings (Non-GAAP)
|
|
$2,095
|
|
|
$1,867
|
|
|
Earnings from operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$14 million
compared with the same period in
2013
. Commercial Airplanes earnings
increased
by
$283 million
reflecting higher 737 airplane deliveries and lower period costs partially offset by higher research and development expense.
BDS
earnings
decreased
by
$54 million
due to lower earnings in the
BMA
segment, partially offset by higher earnings in the
GS&S
and
N&SS
segments. Unallocated pension and other postretirement benefit expense reduced earnings in
2014
by
$214 million
more than
2013
due to higher curtailment charges.
Core operating earnings for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$228 million
compared with the same period in
2013
primarily reflecting higher earnings at Commercial Airplanes offset by lower earnings at BDS.
Unallocated Items and Eliminations
The most significant items included in Unallocated items and eliminations are shown in the following table:
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Share-based plans
|
|
($24
|
)
|
|
($31
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
7
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|||
|
Eliminations and other
|
(150
|
)
|
(83
|
)
|
|||
|
Sub-total (included in core operating earnings*)
|
(167
|
)
|
(170
|
)
|
|||
|
Pension
|
(576
|
)
|
(358
|
)
|
|||
|
Postretirement
|
23
|
|
19
|
|
|||
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit expense
(excluded from core operating earnings*) |
(553
|
)
|
(339
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
($720
|
)
|
|
($509
|
)
|
|
* Core operating earnings is a Non-GAAP measure that excludes certain components of pension and postretirement benefit expense. See page
46
.
Deferred compensation expense for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
decreased
by
$63 million
compared with the same period in
2013
primarily driven by changes in our stock price.
Eliminations and other unallocated expense for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$67 million
compared with the same period in
2013
primarily due to the timing of elimination of profit on intercompany aircraft deliveries.
31
We recorded net periodic benefit cost related to pension and other postretirement benefits of
$869 million
and
$954 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
. The decrease in net periodic benefit cost related to pension is primarily due to lower amortization of actuarial losses reflecting discount rates, and higher expected return on plan assets. This decrease is partially offset by higher curtailment charges. A portion of net periodic benefit cost is recognized as product costs in Earnings from operations in the period incurred and the remainder is included in inventory at the end of the reporting period and recorded in Earnings from operations in subsequent periods. Unallocated pension expense includes charges of
$334 million
, primarily for curtailment costs, for defined benefit pension plan changes during three months ended March 31, 2014. See Note
11
.
Costs are allocated to the business segments as described in Note
17
.
Net periodic benefit costs included in Earnings from operations were as follows:
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Pension
|
Other Postretirement
Benefits
|
|||||||||||||
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||||||
|
Allocated to business segments
|
|
($459
|
)
|
|
($433
|
)
|
|
($94
|
)
|
|
($110
|
)
|
|||
|
Other unallocated items and eliminations
|
(576
|
)
|
(358
|
)
|
23
|
|
19
|
|
|||||||
|
Total
|
|
($1,035
|
)
|
|
($791
|
)
|
|
($71
|
)
|
|
($91
|
)
|
|||
Other Earnings Items
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$1,542
|
|
|
$1,528
|
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
9
|
|
9
|
|
|||
|
Interest and debt expense
|
(92
|
)
|
(99
|
)
|
|||
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
1,459
|
|
1,438
|
|
|||
|
Income tax expense
|
(494
|
)
|
(332
|
)
|
|||
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
|
$965
|
|
|
$1,106
|
|
|
Our effective income tax rates were
33.9%
and
23.1%
for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
. The effective tax rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
is higher than the comparable prior year period primarily due to the retroactive reinstatement of the 2012 U.S. research and development tax credit (research tax credit) in the first quarter of 2013 which reduced income tax expense by
$145 million
. The research tax credit was effective for 2013, but due to the expiration at the end of 2013 no tax benefit was recorded in 2014.
For additional discussion related to Income Taxes, see Note
3
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
32
Total Costs and Expenses (“Cost of Sales”)
Cost of sales, for both products and services, consists primarily of raw materials, parts, sub-assemblies, labor, overhead and subcontracting costs. Our Commercial Airplanes segment predominantly uses program accounting to account for cost of sales and
BDS
predominantly uses contract accounting. Under program accounting, cost of sales for each commercial airplane program equals the product of (i) revenue recognized in connection with customer deliveries and (ii) the estimated cost of sales percentage applicable to the total remaining program. Under contract accounting, the amount reported as cost of sales is determined by applying the estimated cost of sales percentage to the amount of revenue recognized. The following table summarizes cost of sales:
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||
|
Three months ended March 31
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
Change
|
|
|||||
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$17,296
|
|
|
$15,756
|
|
|
$1,540
|
|
||
|
Cost of sales as a % of Revenues
|
84.5
|
%
|
83.4
|
%
|
1.1
|
%
|
|||||
Cost of sales for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$1,540 million
, or
10%
compared with the same period in
2013
. This increase was primarily driven by the
$1,572 million
or
8%
increase in revenues. Cost of sales at Commercial Airplanes
increased
by
$1,635 million
while cost of sales at
BDS
decreased
by
$412 million
. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue was approximately
84.5%
in the
three months ended March 31, 2014
compared with
83.4%
the same period in
2013
primarily driven by higher unallocated pension expense due to pension curtailment charges in the current period.
Research and Development
The following table summarizes our Research and development expense:
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Commercial Airplanes
|
|
$529
|
|
|
$419
|
|
|
|
Defense, Space & Security
|
280
|
|
272
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
|
|
14
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
$809
|
|
|
$705
|
|
|
Research and development expense for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$104 million
compared with the same period in
2013
primarily due to higher spending at Commercial Airplanes on the 737 MAX and 777X.
33
Backlog
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
|||
|
Total contractual backlog
|
|
$422,690
|
|
|
$422,661
|
|
|
|
Unobligated backlog
|
17,110
|
|
18,267
|
|
|||
Contractual backlog of unfilled orders excludes purchase options, announced orders for which definitive contracts have not been executed, and unobligated U.S. and non-U.S. government contract funding. The increase in contractual backlog during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
compared with
December 31, 2013
was primarily due to commercial airplane orders and reclassifications from unobligated backlog related to incremental funding. The increase was partially offset by commercial airplane deliveries, cancellation of orders and revenues recognized on awarded contracts.
Unobligated backlog includes U.S. and non-U.S. government definitive contracts for which funding has not been authorized. The unobligated backlog of
$17,110 million
at
March 31, 2014
decreased from
December 31, 2013
primarily due to reclassifications to contractual backlog related to incremental funding for BDS contracts, partially offset by contract awards.
Additional Considerations
KC-46A Tanker
In 2011, we were awarded a contract from the
U.S. Air Force
(
USAF
) to design, develop, manufacture and deliver 4 next generation aerial refueling tankers. The
KC-46A Tanker
is a derivative of our 767 commercial aircraft. This contract is a fixed-price incentive firm contract valued at $4.9 billion and involves highly complex designs and systems integration. The gross margin on the contract remains breakeven and changes to our estimated cost to perform the work could result in a material charge. This contract contains production options. If all options under the contract are exercised, we expect to deliver 179 aircraft for a total expected contract value of approximately $30 billion. For segment reporting purposes, backlog, revenues and costs are recorded in the Commercial Airplanes and
BMA
segments.
Russia/Ukraine
We are monitoring recent political unrest involving Russia and Ukraine, where we and some of our suppliers source titanium products and/or have operations. A number of our commercial customers also have operations in Russia and Ukraine. To date, we have not experienced any disruptions to production or deliveries. Should suppliers or customers experience disruption, our production and/or deliveries could be materially impacted.
34
Segment Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Commercial Airplanes
Results of Operations
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$12,737
|
|
|
$10,690
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$1,502
|
|
|
$1,219
|
|
|
|
Operating margins
|
11.8
|
%
|
11.4
|
%
|
|||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
|||
|
Contractual backlog
|
|
$373,950
|
|
|
$372,980
|
|
|
|
Unobligated backlog
|
450
|
|
660
|
|
|||
Revenues
Revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$2,047 million
or
19%
compared with the same period in
2013
due to higher airplane deliveries
. Revenues in the first quarter of 2013 reflect the temporary suspension of 787 deliveries.
Commercial airplane deliveries were as follows:
|
|
737
|
|
747
|
|
767
|
|
777
|
|
787
|
|
Total
|
|
|||||
|
Deliveries during the first three months of 2014
|
115
|
|
(1)
|
4
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
18
|
|
161
|
|
||||
|
Deliveries during the first three months of 2013
|
102
|
|
(1)
|
6
|
|
4
|
|
24
|
|
1
|
|
137
|
|
||||
|
Cumulative deliveries as of 3/31/2014
|
4,848
|
|
1,486
|
|
1,061
|
|
1,188
|
|
132
|
|
|||||||
|
Cumulative deliveries as of 12/31/2013
|
4,733
|
|
1,482
|
|
1,061
|
|
1,164
|
|
114
|
|
|||||||
|
(1)
|
Includes intercompany deliveries of three aircraft in 2014 and two in 2013.
|
Earnings From Operations
Earnings from operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$283 million
compared with the same period in
2013
. Increased earnings of $340 million were primarily driven by higher 737 airplane deliveries and lower period costs of $53 million. Period costs in 2013 included 787 engineering support costs related to the battery system. Higher research and development expense of
$110 million
in 2014 was due to increased spending on the 737 MAX and 777X.
Backlog
The increase in contractual backlog during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
was due to orders in excess of deliveries partially reduced by cancellation of orders.
35
Accounting Quantity
The following table provides details of the accounting quantities and firm orders by program. Cumulative firm orders represent the cumulative number of commercial jet aircraft deliveries plus undelivered firm orders.
|
Program
|
||||||||||||||
|
As of 3/31/2014
|
737
|
|
747
|
|
767
|
|
777
|
|
787
|
|
||||
|
Program accounting quantities
|
7,200
|
|
1,574
|
|
1,113
|
|
1,550
|
|
1,300
|
|
||||
|
Undelivered units under firm orders
|
3,794
|
|
52
|
|
49
|
|
360
|
|
899
|
|
||||
|
Cumulative firm orders
|
8,642
|
|
1,538
|
|
1,110
|
|
1,548
|
|
1,031
|
|
||||
|
Program
|
||||||||||||||
|
As of 12/31/2013
|
737
|
|
747
|
|
767
|
|
777
|
|
787
|
|
||||
|
Program accounting quantities
|
7,000
|
|
1,574
|
|
1,113
|
|
1,550
|
|
1,300
|
|
||||
|
Undelivered units under firm orders
|
3,680
|
|
55
|
|
49
|
|
380
|
|
916
|
|
||||
|
Cumulative firm orders
|
8,413
|
|
1,537
|
|
1,110
|
|
1,544
|
|
1,030
|
|
||||
Program Highlights
737 Program
The accounting quantity for the 737 program increased by 200 units during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
due to the program
’
s normal progress of obtaining additional orders and delivering airplanes. The accounting quantity includes NG and MAX units. As previously announced, we plan to increase our production rate from 38 to 42 per month in the second quarter of 2014 and to 47 per month in 2017. First delivery of the 737 MAX is expected in 2017.
747 Program
Continued weakness in the air cargo market and lower-than-expected demand for large commercial passenger aircraft have resulted in pricing pressures and fewer orders than anticipated. We decreased our production rate from 2 to 1.5 per month starting February 2014 through the end of 2015. We continue to have a number of unsold 747 production positions and remain focused on obtaining additional orders, reducing out-of-sequence work, improving supply chain efficiency and implementing cost-reduction efforts. If market and production risks cannot be mitigated, the program could face a reach-forward loss that may be material.
767 Program
As previously announced, we reconfigured the 767 assembly line to include a 767 derivative to support the Tanker program and decreased our production rate from 2 to 1 per month. We plan to increase the production rate from 1 to 1.5 per month in 2014 and back to 2 per month in 2016.
777 Program
We are currently producing at 8.3 per month. In the fourth quarter of 2013 we launched the 777X and first delivery is expected in 2020.
787 Program
We began the production rate increase from 7 to 10 per month in final assembly in November 2013 and the first delivery at that production rate occurred in March 2014. Production and flight testing of the 787-9 continues to be on schedule and we expect the first customer delivery to occur in mid-2014. First delivery of the 787-10 derivative aircraft is targeted for 2018.
We continue to incorporate engineering and other design changes identified during 787-8 flight testing into already completed aircraft at our Everett modification center. We also remain focused on stabilizing 787 production rates at 10 per month while continuing to improve aircraft reliability and satisfy customer mission and performance requirements. We continue to monitor and address challenges associated with aircraft production and assembly, including management of our manufacturing operations and extended global supply chain, completion and integration of traveled work, as well as the incorporation of the 787-9 derivative into the manufacturing process. In addition, we continue to work with our customers and suppliers to assess
36
the specific impacts of schedule changes, including requests for contractual relief related to delivery delays and supplier assertions.
During 2009, we concluded that the first three flight-test 787 aircraft could not be sold as previously anticipated due to the inordinate amount of rework and unique and extensive modifications made to those aircraft. As a result, costs associated with these airplanes were included in research and development expense. Based on sales activity and market interest we continue to believe that the remaining 787 flight-test aircraft are commercially saleable and we continue to include costs related to these aircraft in program inventory. If we determine that the remaining flight test aircraft cannot be sold, we may incur additional charges related to the reclassification of costs associated with those aircraft to research and development expense.
The accounting quantity of 1,300 units remains unchanged and reflects the incorporation of revenue and cost estimates associated with the 787-10 and planned production rate increases to 12 and 14 airplanes per month in future years. The accounting quantity of 1,300 units continues to represent approximately 10 years of production at planned production rates. The combination of production challenges, change incorporation, schedule delays and customer and supplier impacts has created significant pressure on program profitability. If risks related to this program, including risks associated with planned production rate increases, or introducing the 787-9 and 787-10 derivatives as scheduled cannot be mitigated, the program could face additional customer claims and/or supplier assertions, as well as further pressures on program profitability and/or a reach-forward loss. We continue to implement mitigation plans and cost-reduction efforts to improve program profitability and address program risks.
Additional Considerations
The development and ongoing production of commercial aircraft is extremely complex, involving extensive coordination and integration with suppliers and highly-skilled labor from thousands of employees and other partners. Meeting or exceeding our performance and reliability standards, as well as those of customers and regulators, can be costly and technologically challenging. In addition, the introduction of new aircraft and derivatives, such as the 787-9, 787-10, 737 MAX and 777X, involves increased risks associated with meeting development, production and certification schedules. As a result, our ability to deliver aircraft on time, satisfy performance and reliability standards and achieve or maintain, as applicable, program profitability is subject to significant risks. Factors that could result in lower margins (or a material charge if an airplane program has or is determined to have reach-forward losses) include the following: changes to the program accounting quantity, customer and model mix, production costs and rates, changes to price escalation factors in aircraft purchase contracts, performance or reliability issues involving completed aircraft, capital expenditures and other costs associated with increasing or adding new production capacity, learning curve, additional change incorporation, anticipated cost reductions, flight test and certification schedules, costs, schedule and demand for new airplanes and derivatives and status of customer claims, supplier assertions and other contractual negotiations. While we believe the cost and revenue estimates incorporated in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are appropriate, the technical complexity of our airplane programs creates financial risk as additional completion costs may become necessary or scheduled delivery dates could be extended, which could trigger termination provisions, order cancellations or other financially significant exposure.
37
Defense, Space & Security
Business Environment and Trends
United States Government Defense Environment Overview
U.S. government appropriation levels remain subject to significant uncertainty. In August 2011, the Budget Control Act (The Act) established limits on U.S. government discretionary spending, including a reduction of defense spending by approximately $490 billion between the 2012 and 2021 U.S. government fiscal years. The Act also provided that the defense budget would face “sequestration” cuts of up to an additional $500 billion during that same period to the extent that discretionary spending limits are exceeded. The impact of sequestration cuts was reduced with respect to FY2014 and FY2015 following the enactment of The Bipartisan Budget Act in December 2013. However, significant uncertainty remains with respect to overall levels of defense spending and it is likely that U.S. government discretionary spending levels will continue to be subject to significant pressure, including risk of future sequestration cuts.
Significant uncertainty also continues with respect to program-level appropriations for the U.S. Department of Defense (
U.S. DoD
) and other government agencies, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, within the overall budgetary framework described above. Future budget cuts, including cuts mandated by sequestration, or future procurement decisions associated with the appropriations process could result in reductions, cancellations and/or delays of existing contracts or programs. Any of these impacts could have a material effect on the results of the Company's operations, financial position and/or cash flows.
In addition to the risks described above, if Congress is unable to pass appropriations bills in a timely manner, a government shutdown could result which could have impacts above and beyond those resulting from budget cuts or sequestration impacts. For example, requirements to furlough employees in the
U.S. DoD
or other government agencies could result in payment delays, impair our ability to perform work on existing contracts, and/or negatively impact future orders.
BDS Realignment
Effective during the first quarter of 2014, certain programs were realigned between BDS segments. The realignments include certain BMA aircraft and modernization programs which were moved to GS&S. Business segment data for 2013 have been adjusted to reflect the realignment. See Note
17
.
Results of Operations
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$7,633
|
|
|
$8,110
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$778
|
|
|
$832
|
|
|
|
Operating margins
|
10.2
|
%
|
10.3
|
%
|
|||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
|||
|
Contractual backlog
|
|
$48,740
|
|
|
$49,681
|
|
|
|
Unobligated backlog
|
16,660
|
|
17,607
|
|
|||
Since our operating cycle is long-term and involves many different types of development and production contracts with varying delivery and milestone schedules, the operating results of a particular year, or year-to-year comparisons of revenues, earnings and backlog may not be indicative of future operating results. In addition, depending on the customer and their funding sources, our orders might be structured as annual follow-on contracts, or as one large multi-year order or long-term award. As a result, period-to-period comparisons of backlog are not necessarily indicative of future workloads. The following discussions of comparative results among periods should be viewed in this context.
38
Revenues
BDS
revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
decreased
by
$477 million
compared with the same period in
2013
due to lower revenues of
$522 million
and
$84 million
in the
BMA
and
N&SS
segments, partially offset by higher revenues of
$129 million
in the
GS&S
segment.
Deliveries of units for new-build production aircraft, excluding remanufactures and modifications, were as follows:
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|||
|
|
2014
|
2013
|
|
|
F/A-18 Models
|
11
|
12
|
|
|
F-15E Eagle
|
4
|
3
|
|
|
C-17 Globemaster III
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
CH-47 Chinook
|
17
|
9
|
|
|
AH-64 Apache
|
10
|
15
|
|
|
P-8 Models
|
|
2
|
|
|
AEW&C
|
1
|
|
|
|
Total new-build production aircraft
|
46
|
44
|
|
Earnings From Operations
BDS
earnings from operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
decreased
by
$54 million
compared to the same period in
2013
due to lower earnings of
$95 million
in the
BMA
segment, partially offset by higher earnings of
$29 million
and
$12 million
in the
GS&S
and
N&SS
segments.
Backlog
BDS
total backlog was
$65,400 million
at
March 31, 2014
, reflecting a decrease of
3%
from
December 31, 2013
. For further details on the changes between periods, refer to the discussions of the individual segments below.
Additional Considerations
Our
BDS
business includes a variety of development programs which have complex design and technical challenges. Many of these programs have cost-type contracting arrangements. In these cases, the associated financial risks are primarily in reduced fees, lower profit rates or program cancellation if cost, schedule or technical performance issues arise. Examples of these programs include
Ground-based Midcourse Defense
(
GMD
), Proprietary and Space Launch Systems programs. Some of our development programs are contracted on a fixed-price basis. Many of these programs have highly complex designs. As technical or quality issues arise during development, we may experience schedule delays and cost impacts, which could increase our estimated cost to perform the work or reduce our estimated price, either of which could result in a material charge or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition. These programs are ongoing, and while we believe the cost and fee estimates incorporated in the financial statements are appropriate, the technical complexity of these programs creates financial risk as additional completion costs may become necessary or scheduled delivery dates could be extended, which could trigger termination provisions, the loss of satellite in-orbit incentive payments, or other financially significant exposure. These programs have risk for reach-forward losses if our estimated costs exceed our estimated contract revenues. Examples of significant fixed-price development programs include
Airborne Early Warning and Control
(
AEW&C
), India P-8I, Saudi Arabia F-15, USAF KC-46A Tanker, and commercial and military satellites.
39
Revenue and cost estimates for all significant contracts are reviewed and reassessed quarterly. Changes in these estimates could result in recognition of cumulative catch-up adjustments to the contract’s inception to date revenues, cost of sales and profit, in the period in which such changes are made. Changes in revenue and cost estimates could also result in a reach-forward loss or an adjustment to a reach-forward loss, which would be recorded immediately in earnings. For the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
, net favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments, including reach-forward losses, across all BDS contracts increased Earnings from operations by
$167 million
and
$105 million
.
Boeing Military Aircraft
Results of Operations
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$3,458
|
|
|
$3,980
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$332
|
|
|
$427
|
|
|
|
Operating margins
|
9.6
|
%
|
10.7
|
%
|
|||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
|||
|
Contractual backlog
|
|
$23,232
|
|
|
$23,561
|
|
|
|
Unobligated backlog
|
9,964
|
|
10,063
|
|
|||
Revenues
BMA
revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
decreased
by
$522 million
or
13%
when compared with the same period in
2013
primarily due to lower revenues on the F-15 program. Revenue reductions of $842 million reflect first quarter 2013 F-15 development milestones and lower P-8 aircraft deliveries in 2014. These reductions were partially offset by an increase of $258 million related to higher deliveries of CH-47 Chinook and higher revenues on the V-22 Osprey program.
Earnings From Operations
BMA
earnings from operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
decreased
by
$95 million
,
a decrease
of
22%
compared to the same period in
2013
, primarily due to a reduction of $89 million reflecting lower F-15 and P-8 revenues. In addition, in March 2014, we recorded a charge of
$48 million
to write-off inventory and accrue termination liabilities as a result of our decision to produce three fewer C-17 aircraft in 2015 than previously planned. See Note
9
. These decreases were partially offset by increased CH-47 Chinook earnings. Net favorable cumulative contract catch-up adjustments were
$39 million
higher
in the
three months ended March 31, 2014
than in the same period in
2013
primarily driven by more favorable adjustments on the F-15 program.
Backlog
BMA
total backlog of
$33,196 million
at
March 31, 2014
was largely unchanged from
December 31, 2013
, reflecting revenue recognized on contracts awarded in prior years offset by contract awards for the P-8 and Apache programs.
Additional Considerations
C-17 and F/A-18
See the discussions of the C-17 and F/A-18 programs in Note
9
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
KC-46A Tanker
See the discussion of the KC-46A Tanker program on page
34
.
40
Network & Space Systems
Results of Operations
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$1,876
|
|
|
$1,960
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$168
|
|
|
$156
|
|
|
|
Operating margins
|
9.0
|
%
|
8.0
|
%
|
|||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
|||
|
Contractual backlog
|
|
$9,380
|
|
|
$9,832
|
|
|
|
Unobligated backlog
|
5,598
|
|
6,076
|
|
|||
Revenues
N&SS
revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
decreased
by
$84 million
compared with the same period in
2013
, primarily due to a reduction of $184 million related to lower volume in several
Electronic and Information Solution
s programs along with lower civil satellite program milestones, partially offset by an increase of $107 million related to higher volume in the
GMD
and Exploration Launch Systems programs.
Earnings From Operations
N&SS
earnings from operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$12 million
compared with the same period in
2013
as a result of improved performance on certain fixed price contracts. Net favorable cumulative contract catch-up adjustments were
$23 million
higher
in the
three months ended March 31, 2014
than in the same period in
2013
.
N&SS
earnings from operations include equity earnings of
$46 million
and
$40 million
primarily from the
United Launch Alliance
(
ULA
) joint venture for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
.
Backlog
N&SS
total backlog was
$14,978 million
at
March 31, 2014
, reflecting a
decrease
of
6%
from
December 31, 2013
primarily due to revenues recognized on contracts awarded in prior years, partially offset by current year contract awards for government satellite and missile defense system programs.
Additional Considerations
United Launch Alliance
See the discussion of Indemnifications to
ULA
and Financing Commitments in Notes
5
,
9
and
10
of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sea Launch
See the discussion of the Sea Launch receivables in Note
8
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
LightSquared
See the discussion of the LightSquared, LLC receivables in Note
4
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
41
Global Services & Support
Results of Operations
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$2,299
|
|
|
$2,170
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$278
|
|
|
$249
|
|
|
|
Operating margins
|
12.1
|
%
|
11.5
|
%
|
|||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
March 31
2014 |
|
|
December 31
2013 |
|
||
|
Contractual backlog
|
|
$16,128
|
|
|
$16,288
|
|
|
|
Unobligated backlog
|
1,098
|
|
1,468
|
|
|||
Revenues
GS&S
revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$129 million
compared with the same period in
2013
primarily due to an increase of $177 million related to higher volume in
Maintenance, Modification and Upgrades
, driven by higher
AEW&C
deliveries, and
Integrated Logistics
(
IL
) programs. This increase was partially offset by a reduction of $61 million due to lower volume in several
Training Systems & Government Services
(
TSGS
) programs.
Earnings From Operations
GS&S
earnings from operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
increased
by
$29 million
or
12%
compared with the same period in
2013
primarily due to an increase of $39 million related to improved performance in several
IL
programs, partially offset by a reduction of $10 million due to lower volume in several
TSGS
programs. Net favorable cumulative contract catch-up adjustments for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
were consistent with the same period in
2013
.
Backlog
GS&S
total backlog was
$17,226 million
at
March 31, 2014
, reflecting a
decrease
of
3%
from
December 31, 2013
primarily due to revenues recognized on contracts awarded in prior years, partially offset by current year contract awards for support on the C-17 program.
42
Boeing Capital
Operating Results
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$82
|
|
|
$105
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
$44
|
|
|
$44
|
|
|
|
Operating margins
|
54
|
%
|
42
|
%
|
|||
Revenues
Boeing Capital
(
BCC
) segment revenues consist principally of lease income from equipment under operating lease, interest income from financing receivables and notes, and other income.
BCC
’s revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
decreased
by
$23 million
compared with the same period in
2013
primarily due to reductions in finance lease income resulting from non-recurring adjustments to estimated residual values.
Earnings From Operations
BCC
’s earnings from operations are presented net of interest expense, recovery of losses, asset impairment expense, depreciation on leased equipment and other operating expenses. Earnings from operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
were consistent with the same period in
2013
. In the current period, earnings were impacted by lower revenues offset by a reduction in the allowance for losses on receivables driven by a change to a customer credit rating.
Financial Position
The following table presents selected financial data for
BCC
:
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
March 31
2014 |
|
December 31
2013 |
|
|||
|
Customer financing and investment portfolio, net
|
|
$3,470
|
|
|
$3,883
|
|
|
|
Other assets, primarily cash and short-term investments
|
929
|
|
505
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
|
$4,399
|
|
|
$4,388
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities, primarily deferred income taxes
|
|
$1,311
|
|
|
$1,296
|
|
|
|
Debt, including intercompany loans
|
2,574
|
|
2,577
|
|
|||
|
Equity
|
514
|
|
515
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$4,399
|
|
|
$4,388
|
|
|
|
Debt-to-equity ratio
|
5.0-to-1
|
|
5.0-to-1
|
|
|||
BCC
’s customer financing and investment portfolio at
March 31, 2014
decreased
from
December 31, 2013
primarily due to portfolio run-off partially offset by the reduction in the allowance for losses on receivables. At
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
,
BCC
had
$75 million
and
$83 million
of assets that were held for sale or re-lease, of which
$40 million
and
$57 million
had either executed term sheets with deposits or firm contracts to be sold or placed on lease. Additionally, aircraft subject to leases with a carrying value of approximately
$8 million
are scheduled to be returned off lease in the next 12 months. We are seeking to remarket these aircraft or have the leases extended.
BCC enters into certain transactions with Boeing, reflected in the Other segment, in the form of intercompany guarantees and other subsidies that mitigate the effects of certain credit quality or asset impairment issues on the BCC segment.
43
Restructurings and Restructuring Requests
From time to time, certain customers have requested a restructuring of their transactions with
BCC
. Since
December 31, 2013
,
BCC
has not reached agreement on any restructuring requests that would have a material effect on our earnings, cash flows and/or financial position.
Other Segment
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$20
|
|
|
$27
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
(62
|
)
|
(58
|
)
|
|||
Other segment losses for the
three months ended March 31, 2014
remained largely consistent with the prior year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow Summary
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||
|
Net earnings
|
|
$965
|
|
|
$1,106
|
|
|
|
Non-cash items
|
484
|
|
518
|
|
|||
|
Changes in working capital
|
(337
|
)
|
(1,100
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
1,112
|
|
524
|
|
|||
|
Net cash provided/(used) by investing activities
|
406
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
(3,668
|
)
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
4
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|||
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(2,146
|
)
|
(2,006
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
9,088
|
|
10,341
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$6,942
|
|
|
$8,335
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was
$1.1 billion
during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
, an
increase
of
$0.6 billion
compared with the same period in
2013
primarily due to increases in accounts payable and customer payments offset partially by higher inventory growth. Our investment in gross inventories increased by
$4.2 billion
and
$3.9 billion
during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
and
2013
reflecting continued investment in commercial airplane program inventory, primarily 787 inventory. Advances and progress billings increased by
$3.3 billion
compared with an
increase
of
$2.7 billion
for the same period in
2013
, primarily due to payments from commercial airplane customers.
Investing Activities
Cash provided by investing activities totaled
$0.4 billion
during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
compared with
$0.8 billion
used during the same period in
2013
, largely due to higher net proceeds from investments in time deposits.
Net proceeds from
investments were
$0.9 billion
in
2014
compared with
net contributions to
investments of
$0.3 billion
for the same period in
2013
. In
2014
, capital expenditures totaled
$0.5 billion
consistent with the same period in
2013
. We expect capital expenditures to be higher in
2014
than 2013 due to continued investment to support growth.
44
Financing Activities
Cash used by financing activities was
$3.7 billion
during the
three months ended March 31, 2014
compared with
$1.7 billion
in the same period in
2013
, an increase primarily due to share repurchases of
$2.5 billion
in
2014
partially offset by lower debt repayments of
$0.5 billion
in the current year.
During the
three months ended March 31, 2014
, we repaid
$0.8 billion
of debt. At
March 31, 2014
, the recorded balance of debt was
$8.9 billion
of which
$1.7 billion
was classified as short-term. This includes
$2.6 billion
of debt attributable to
BCC
, of which
$0.7 billion
was classified as short-term.
During the
three months ended March 31, 2014
, we repurchased
19.4 million
shares totaling
$2.5 billion
through our open market share repurchase program. In
2014
and
2013
, there were
0.6 million
and
0.7 million
shares transferred to us from employees for tax withholdings.
Capital Resources
We have substantial borrowing capacity. Any future borrowings may affect our credit ratings and are subject to various debt covenants as described below. We have a commercial paper program that continues to serve as a significant potential source of short-term liquidity. Throughout the
three months ended March 31, 2014
, we had no commercial paper borrowings outstanding. Currently, we have
$4.8 billion
of unused borrowing capacity on revolving credit line agreements. We anticipate that these credit lines will primarily serve as backup liquidity to support our general corporate borrowing needs.
Financing commitments totaled
$17.6 billion
and
$18 billion
at
March 31, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
. We anticipate that we will not be required to fund a significant portion of our financing commitments as we continue to work with third party financiers to provide alternative financing to customers. Historically, we have not been required to fund significant amounts of outstanding commitments. However, there can be no assurances that we will not be required to fund greater amounts than historically required.
In the event we require additional funding to support strategic business opportunities, our commercial aircraft financing commitments, unfavorable resolution of litigation or other loss contingencies, or other business requirements, we expect to meet increased funding requirements by issuing commercial paper or term debt. We believe our ability to access external capital resources should be sufficient to satisfy existing short-term and long-term commitments and plans, and also to provide adequate financial flexibility to take advantage of potential strategic business opportunities should they arise within the next year. However, there can be no assurance of the cost or availability of future borrowings, if any, under our commercial paper program, in the debt markets or our credit facilities.
At
March 31, 2014
, we were in compliance with the covenants for our debt and credit facilities. The most restrictive covenants include a limitation on mortgage debt and sale and leaseback transactions as a percentage of consolidated net tangible assets (as defined in the credit agreements), and a limitation on consolidated debt as a percentage of total capital (as defined). When considering debt covenants, we continue to have substantial borrowing capacity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are a party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements including certain guarantees. For discussion of these arrangements, see Note
10
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contingent Obligations
We have significant contingent obligations that arise in the ordinary course of business, which include the following:
Legal
Various legal proceedings, claims and investigations are pending against us. Legal contingencies are discussed in Note
16
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, including certain employment, labor and benefits litigation.
Environmental Remediation
We are involved with various environmental remediation activities and have recorded a liability of
$646 million
at
March 31, 2014
. For additional information, see Note
9
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
45
Income Taxes
We have recorded a liability of
$1,114 million
at
March 31, 2014
for uncertain tax positions. For further discussion of income taxes, see Note
3
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-GAAP Measures
Core Operating Earnings, Core Operating Margin and Core Earnings Per Share
Our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) which we supplement with certain non-GAAP financial information. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related GAAP measures, and other companies may define such measures differently. We encourage investors to review our financial statements and publicly-filed reports in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure. Core operating earnings, core operating margin and core earnings per share exclude the impact of unallocated pension and other postretirement benefit expenses which represent costs not attributable to business segments - see Note
17
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Management uses core operating earnings, core operating margin and core earnings per share for purposes of evaluating and forecasting underlying business performance. Management believes these core earnings measures provide investors additional insights into operational performance as unallocated pension and other postretirement benefit cost, primarily represent costs driven by market factors and costs not allocable to U.S. government contracts.
Reconciliation of GAAP Measures to Non-GAAP Measures
The table below reconciles the non-GAAP financial measures of core operating earnings, core operating margin and core earnings per share with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures of earnings from operations, operating margins and diluted earnings per share.
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
||||||
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Revenues
|
|
$20,465
|
|
|
$18,893
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations, as reported
|
|
$1,542
|
|
|
$1,528
|
|
|
|
Operating margins
|
7.5
|
%
|
8.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Unallocated pension and other postretirement benefit expense
|
|
$553
|
|
|
$339
|
|
|
|
Core operating earnings (non-GAAP)
|
|
$2,095
|
|
|
$1,867
|
|
|
|
Core operating margins (non-GAAP)
|
10.2
|
%
|
9.9
|
%
|
|||
|
Diluted earnings per share, as reported
|
|
$1.28
|
|
|
$1.44
|
|
|
|
Unallocated pension and other postretirement benefit expense
(1)
|
|
$0.48
|
|
|
$0.29
|
|
|
|
Core earnings per share (non-GAAP)
|
|
$1.76
|
|
|
$1.73
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares (in millions)
|
754.1
|
|
768.7
|
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Earnings per share impact is presented net of the federal statutory rate of 35.0%.
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no significant changes to our market risk since
December 31, 2013
.
46
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of
March 31, 2014
and have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b)
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There were no changes that occurred during the
first
quarter of
2014
that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
47
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Currently, we are involved in a number of legal proceedings. For a discussion of contingencies related to legal proceedings, see Note
16
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013
.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information about purchases we made during the quarter ended
March 31, 2014
of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
|||||||||
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
(1)
|
|
Average
Price
Paid per
Share
|
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
|
|
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares That
May Yet be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
(2)
|
|
||||||
|
1/1/2014 thru 1/31/2014
|
3,798,813
|
|
|
$138.30
|
|
3,613,468
|
|
|
$10,310
|
|
|||
|
2/1/2014 thru 2/28/2014
|
12,024,644
|
|
127.19
|
|
11,573,458
|
|
8,839
|
|
|||||
|
3/1/2014 thru 3/31/2014
|
4,169,781
|
|
127.10
|
|
4,163,910
|
|
8,310
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
19,993,238
|
|
|
$129.28
|
|
19,350,836
|
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
We purchased an aggregate of
19,350,836
shares of our common stock in the open market pursuant to our repurchase program and
642,402
shares transferred to us from employees in satisfaction of minimum tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock units during the period. We did not purchase shares in swap transactions.
|
|
(2)
|
On December 16, 2013, the Board approved a new repurchase plan (the Program) for up to $10 billion of common stock. Unless terminated earlier by a Board resolution, the Program will expire when we have used all authorized funds for repurchase.
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
48
Item 6. Exhibits
|
10(i)
|
Form of Notice of Terms of Restricted Stock Units dated February 24, 2014 (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014).
|
|
10(ii)
|
Form of Notice of Terms of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014).
|
|
10(iii)
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Employees of The Boeing Company, as Amended and Restated effective March 1, 2014 (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2014)
|
|
10(iv)
|
Supplemental Benefit Plan for Employees of The Boeing Company, as Amended and Restated effective March 1, 2014 (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2014)
|
|
12
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
15
|
Letter from Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm regarding unaudited interim financial information.
|
|
31(i)
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31(ii)
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32(i)
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32(ii)
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
49
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
THE BOEING COMPANY
|
||
|
(Registrant)
|
||
|
April 23, 2014
|
/s/ Robert E. Verbeck
|
|
|
(Date)
|
Robert E. Verbeck – Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller
|
|
50
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I. Financial InformationprintItem 1. Financial StatementsprintNote 1 Basis Of PresentationprintNote 2 Earnings Per ShareprintNote 3 Income TaxesprintNote 4 Accounts ReceivableprintNote 5 InventoriesprintNote 6 Customer FinancingprintNote 7 InvestmentsprintNote 8 Other AssetsprintNote 9 Commitments and ContingenciesprintNote 10 Arrangements with Off-balance Sheet RiskprintNote 11 Postretirement PlansprintNote 12 Share-based Compensation and Other Compensation ArrangementsprintNote 13 Shareholders' EquityprintNote 14 Derivative Financial InstrumentsprintNote 15 Fair Value MeasurementsprintNote 16 Legal ProceedingsprintNote 17 Segment InformationprintItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsprintItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskprintItem 4. Controls and ProceduresprintPart II. Other InformationprintItem 1. Legal ProceedingsprintItem 1A. Risk FactorsprintItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsprintItem 3. Defaults Upon Senior SecuritiesprintItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresprintItem 5. Other InformationprintItem 6. Exhibitsprint