BANR 10-Q Quarterly Report March 31, 2017

BANNER CORP

10-Ks and 10-Qs

10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009

PROXIES

DEF 14A	Filed on May 22, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on April 9, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on May 22, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on April 9, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on April 18, 2023
DEF 14A	Filed on May 18, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on April 7, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on March 22, 2021
DEF 14A	Filed on March 20, 2020
DEF 14A	Filed on March 22, 2019
DEF 14A	Filed on March 23, 2018
DEF 14A	Filed on March 24, 2017
DEF 14A	Filed on March 25, 2016
DEF 14A	Filed on March 24, 2015
DEF 14A	Filed on March 24, 2014
DEF 14A	Filed on March 19, 2013
DEF 14A	Filed on March 21, 2012
DEF 14A	Filed on March 22, 2011
DEF 14A	Filed on March 29, 2010
DEF 14A	Filed on None

10-Q 1 banr-3312017x10q.htm 10-Q Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2017


[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______________ to ______________

Commission File Number 000-26584

BANNER CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Washington		91-1691604
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

	10 South First Avenue, Walla Walla, Washington 99362
	(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

	Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (509) 527-3636

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes

[x]

[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes

[x]

[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [x]

Accelerated filer [ ]

Non-accelerated filer [ ]

Smaller reporting company [ ]

Emerging growth company [ ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes

[ ]

[x]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Title of class:

As of April 30, 2017

Common Stock, $.01 par value per share

33,183,039 shares

Non-voting Common Stock, $.01 par value per share

102,234 shares

BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Table of Contents



PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 – Financial Statements. The Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Banner Corporation and Subsidiaries filed as a part of the report are as follows:

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016	4

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	5

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	6

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and the Year Ended December 31, 2016	7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	8

Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	10

Item 2 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Overview	42

Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016	47

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	50

Asset Quality	55

Liquidity and Capital Resources	57

Capital Requirements	58

Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market Risk and Asset/Liability Management	59

Sensitivity Analysis	59

Item 4 – Controls and Procedures	64

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 – Legal Proceedings	65

Item 1A – Risk Factors	65

Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	65

Item 3 – Defaults upon Senior Securities	65

Item 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures	65

Item 5 – Other Information	65

Item 6 – Exhibits	66

SIGNATURES	68

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain matters in this Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain assumptions and are generally identified by use of the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about future economic performance and projections of financial items. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or implied by our forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in our allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses that may be impacted by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets and may lead to increased losses and non-performing assets, and may result in our allowance for loan losses not being adequate to cover actual losses and require us to materially increase our reserves; changes in economic conditions in general and in Washington, Idaho, Oregon, Utah and California in particular; changes in the levels of general interest rates and the relative differences between short and long-term interest rates, loan and deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market; results of safety and soundness and compliance examinations of us by the Federal Reserve (the Federal Reserve) and of our bank subsidiaries by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC), the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks (the Washington DFI) or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, require restitution or institute an informal or formal enforcement action against us or any of our bank subsidiaries which could require us to increase our reserve for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position or affect our ability to borrow funds, or maintain or increase deposits, or impose additional requirements and restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules, including changes related to Basel III; the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the implementing regulations; our ability to attract and retain deposits; increases in premiums for deposit insurance; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets and liabilities, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant changes in valuation; difficulties in reducing risk associated with the loans and securities on our balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential associated charges; the failure or security breach of computer systems on which we depend; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; our ability to implement our business strategies; our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and personnel we may acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames or at all, and any goodwill charges related thereto and costs or difficulties relating to integration matters, including but not limited to customer and employee retention, which might be greater than expected; future goodwill impairment due to changes in our business, changes in market conditions, or other factors; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; our ability to pay dividends on our common stock and non-voting common stock, and interest or principal payments on our junior subordinated debentures; adverse changes in the securities markets; inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; the economic impact of war or any terrorist activities; other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services; and other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including this report on Form 10-Q. Any forward-looking statements are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements included in this report or the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. These risks could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by, or on behalf of, us. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements discussed in this report might not occur, and you should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

As used throughout this report, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company” refer to Banner Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. All references to “Banner” refer to Banner Corporation and those to “the Banks” refer to its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Banner Bank and Islanders Bank, collectively.

BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(Unaudited) (In thousands, except shares)

March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016



ASSETS	March 31 2017			December 31 2016
Cash and due from banks	$	196,277		$	177,083
Interest bearing deposits	104,431			70,636
Total cash and cash equivalents	300,708			247,719
Securities—trading, amortized cost $30,187 and $30,154, respectively	24,753			24,568
Securities—available-for-sale, amortized cost $1,226,747 and $806,336, respectively	1,223,764			800,917
Securities—held-to-maturity, fair value $269,402 and $270,528, respectively	266,391			267,873
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock	10,334			12,506
Loans held for sale (includes $7,282 and $9,600, at fair value, respectively)	86,707			246,353
Loans receivable	7,421,255			7,451,148
Allowance for loan losses	(86,527		)	(85,997		)
Net loans	7,334,728			7,365,151
Accrued interest receivable	30,312			30,178
Real estate owned (REO), held for sale, net	3,040			11,081
Property and equipment, net	162,467			166,481
Goodwill	244,583			244,583
Other intangibles, net	28,488			30,162
Bank-owned life insurance (BOLI)	159,948			158,936
Deferred tax assets, net	124,069			127,694
Other assets	68,086			59,466
Total assets	$	10,068,378		$	9,793,668
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing	$	3,213,044		$	3,140,451
Interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts	4,064,198			3,935,630
Interest-bearing certificates	1,144,718			1,045,333
Total deposits	8,421,960			8,121,414
Advances from FHLB at fair value	213			54,216
Other borrowings	120,245			105,685
Junior subordinated debentures at fair value (issued in connection with Trust Preferred Securities)	96,040			95,200
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	66,201			71,369
Deferred compensation	40,315			40,074
Total liabilities	8,744,974			8,487,958
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 12)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock - $0.01 par value per share, 500,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016	—			—
Common stock and paid in capital - $0.01 par value per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 33,091,948 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017; 33,108,599 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016	1,214,045			1,213,225
Common stock (non-voting) and paid in capital- $0.01 par value per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized; 60,916 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017; 84,788 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016	472			612
Retained earnings	110,783			95,328
Carrying value of shares held in trust for stock related compensation plans	(7,283		)	(7,283		)
Liability for common stock issued to deferred, stock related, compensation plans	7,283			7,283
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,896		)	(3,455		)
Total shareholders' equity	1,323,404			1,305,710
Total liabilities & shareholders' equity	$	10,068,378		$	9,793,668

See Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited) (In thousands, except shares and per share amounts)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans receivable	$	91,288		$	86,958
Mortgage-backed securities	4,647			5,390
Securities and cash equivalents	3,161			2,953
Total interest income	99,096			95,301
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits	2,791			2,946
FHLB advances	273			279
Other borrowings	74			75
Junior subordinated debentures	1,104			958
Total interest expense	4,242			4,258
Net interest income	94,854			91,043
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	2,000			—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	92,854			91,043
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Deposit fees and other service charges	12,186			11,818
Mortgage banking operations	4,603			5,643
Bank-owned life insurance (BOLI)	1,095			1,185
Miscellaneous	3,636			1,263
	21,520			19,909
Net gain on sale of securities	13			21
Net change in valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value	(688		)	29
Total non-interest income	20,845			19,959
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salary and employee benefits	46,063			46,564
Less capitalized loan origination costs	(4,316		)	(4,250		)
Occupancy and equipment	11,996			10,388
Information/computer data services	3,994			4,920
Payment and card processing expenses	5,020			4,785
Professional services	5,152			2,614
Advertising and marketing	1,328			1,734
Deposit insurance	1,266			1,338
State/municipal business and use taxes	799			838
REO operations	(966		)	397
Amortization of core deposit intangibles	1,624			1,808
Miscellaneous	6,118			6,085
	78,078			77,221
Acquisition-related costs	—			6,813
Total non-interest expense	78,078			84,034
Income before provision for income taxes	35,621			26,968
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES	11,828			9,194
NET INCOME	$	23,793		$	17,774
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.72		$	0.52
Diluted	$	0.72		$	0.52
Cumulative dividends declared per common share	$	0.25		$	0.21
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	32,933,444			34,023,800
Diluted	33,051,459			34,103,727

See Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited) (In thousands)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
NET INCOME	$	23,793		$	17,774
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF INCOME TAXES:
Unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities arising during the period	2,448			13,473
Income tax expense related to available-for-sale securities unrealized holding gain or loss	(881		)	(4,854		)
Reclassification for net gains on available-for-sale securities realized in earnings	(13		)	(21		)
Income tax expense related to available-for-sale securities realized gains	5			7
Other comprehensive income	1,559			8,605
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	25,352		$	26,379

See Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited) (In thousands, except shares)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and the Year Ended December 31, 2016



	Common Stock and Paid in Capital					Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Shareholders’ Equity
	Shares		Amount			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, January 1, 2016	34,242,255		$	1,261,174		$	39,615		$	(730	)	$	1,300,059
Net income						85,385						85,385
Other comprehensive loss, net of income tax									(2,725		)	(2,725		)
Accrual of dividends on common stock ($0.88/share cumulative)						(29,672		)				(29,672		)
Repurchase of common stock under the terms of the repurchase plan	(1,145,250	)	(50,772		)							(50,772		)
Amortization of stock-based compensation related to restricted stock grants, net of shares surrendered	96,382		3,401									3,401
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation			34									34
Balance, December 31, 2016	33,193,387		$	1,213,837		$	95,328		$	(3,455	)	$	1,305,710



Balance, January 1, 2017	33,193,387		$	1,213,837	$	95,328		$	(3,455	)	$	1,305,710
Net income					23,793						23,793
Other comprehensive income, net of income tax								1,559			1,559
Accrual of dividends on common stock ($0.25/share cumulative)					(8,338		)				(8,338		)
Amortization of stock-based compensation related to restricted stock grants, net of shares surrendered	(40,523	)	680								680
Balance, March 31, 2017	33,152,864		$	1,214,517	$	110,783		$	(1,896	)	$	1,323,404

See Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited) (In thousands)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	23,793		$	17,774
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating activities:
Depreciation	2,888			2,859
Deferred income and expense, net of amortization	(265		)	1,158
Amortization of core deposit intangibles	1,624			1,808
Gain on sale of securities	(13		)	(21		)
Net change in valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value	688			(29		)
Purchases of securities—trading	—			(1,725		)
Principal repayments and maturities of securities—trading	9			1,946
Decrease in deferred taxes	3,625			8,745
Increase in current taxes payable	295			2,540
Equity-based compensation	680			876
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI	(1,085		)	(1,169		)
Gain on sale of loans, net of capitalized servicing rights	(5,496		)	(3,873		)
(Gain) loss on disposal of real estate held for sale and property and equipment	(1,039		)	427
Provision for loan losses	2,000			—
Provision for losses on real estate held for sale	50			205
Origination of loans held for sale	(167,550		)	(202,471		)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale	339,878			205,023
Net change in:
Other assets	(9,412		)	(15,571		)
Other liabilities	(5,283		)	3,542
Net cash provided from operating activities	185,387			22,044
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of securities—available-for-sale	(457,966		)	(123,197		)
Principal repayments and maturities of securities—available-for-sale	32,446			41,376
Proceeds from sales of securities—available-for-sale	2,165			30,566
Purchases of securities — held-to-maturity	—			(26,991		)
Principal repayments and maturities of securities—held-to-maturity	954			843
Loan originations, net of principal repayments	119,569			57,558
Purchases of loans and participating interest in loans	(99,206		)	(70,551		)
Proceeds from sales of other loans	4,627			144,499
Purchases of property and equipment	(3,598		)	(4,331		)
Proceeds from sale of real estate held for sale and sale of other property, net	13,684			4,666
Proceeds from FHLB stock repurchase program	29,192			19,624
Purchase of FHLB stock	(27,020		)	(16,914		)
Other	75			1,276
Net cash (used by) provided from investing activities	(385,078		)	58,424
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase (decrease) in deposits, net	300,546			(25,206		)
Repayment of long term FHLB advances	(2		)	(20,002		)
Repayments of overnight and short term FHLB advances, net	(54,000		)	(37,600		)
Increase in other borrowings, net	14,560			7,807
Cash dividends paid	(7,615		)	(6,166		)
Cash paid for the repurchase of common stock	(809		)	(648		)
Net cash provided from (used by) financing activities	252,680			(81,815		)
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	52,989			(1,347		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD	247,719			261,917
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	300,708		$	260,570

(Continued on next page)

BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

(Unaudited) (In thousands)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid in cash	$	4,202	$	4,349
Taxes paid, net of refunds received in cash	8,543		2,581
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS:
Loans, net of discounts, specific loss allowances and unearned income, transferred to real estate owned and other repossessed assets	—		135
Dividends accrued but not paid until after period end	8,338		7,159

See Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Banner Corporation (the Company or Banner), a bank holding company incorporated in the State of Washington and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Banner Bank and Islanders Bank (the Banks).

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In preparing these financial statements, the Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to March 31, 2017 for potential recognition or disclosure. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included. Certain information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and the accounting standards for interim financial statements. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2016 Consolidated Financial Statements and/or schedules to conform to the 2017 presentation. These reclassifications may have affected certain ratios for the prior periods. The effect of these reclassifications is considered immaterial. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements. Various elements of the Company’s accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, management has identified several accounting policies that, due to the judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, are significant to an understanding of Banner’s financial statements. These policies relate to (i) the methodology for the recognition of interest income, (ii) determination of the provision and allowance for loan losses, (iii) the valuation of financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, including other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses, (iv) the valuation of intangibles, such as goodwill, core deposit intangibles (CDI) and mortgage servicing rights, (v) the valuation of real estate held for sale, (vi) the valuation of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and subsequent recognition of related income and expense, and (vii) the valuation or recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities. These policies and judgments, estimates and assumptions are described in greater detail in subsequent notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Critical Accounting Policies) in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC. There have been no significant changes in our application of accounting policies during the first three months of 2017 .

The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the SEC ( 2016 Form 10-K). Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year or any other interim period.

Note 2: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS RECENTLY ISSUED OR ADOPTED

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers , which creates Topic 606 and supersedes Topic 605, Revenue Recognition . The core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In general, the new guidance requires companies to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current guidance, including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. Under the terms of ASU 2015-14 the standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. For financial reporting purposes, the standard allows for either full retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or modified retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application. Management intends to adopt the new guidance on January 1, 2018. Management is in the process of completing the following analysis that includes (1) identification of all revenue streams included in the financial statements (excluding interest income, which is outside of the scope of the pronouncement); (2) identify revenue streams within the scope of the pronouncement; (3) determination of size, timing, and amount of revenue recognition for streams of income within the scope of the pronouncement; (4) determination of the sample size of contracts for further analysis; and (5) completion of analysis on sample of contracts to evaluate the impact of the new guidance. Based on this analysis the Company is developing processes and procedures during 2017 to address the amendments of this ASU.

In April 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing . The amendments in this ASU do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this ASU clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, discussed above, which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 (Revenues from Contracts with Customers). The Company is evaluating the provisions of this ASU in conjunction with ASU No. 2014-09 to determine the potential impact Topic 606 and its amendments will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients , amending ASC Topic 606 ( Revenue from Contracts with Customers ). The amendments in this ASU do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this ASU affect only several narrow aspects of Topic 606. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, discussed above, which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 ( Revenues from Contracts with Customers ). The Company is evaluating the provisions of this ASU in conjunction with ASU No. 2014-09 to determine the potential impact Topic 606 and its amendments will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . The amendments in this ASU require equity securities to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income. The amendments allow equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values to be remeasured at fair value under certain circumstances and require enhanced disclosures about those investments. This ASU simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values. This ASU also eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The amendments in this ASU require separate presentation in other comprehensive income of the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. This ASU excludes from net income gains or losses that the entity may not realize because those financial liabilities are not usually transferred or settled at their fair values before maturity. The amendments in this ASU require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU No. 2016-01 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Leases (Topic 842)

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . The amendments in this ASU require lessees to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term) at the commencement date; a lease liability, which is a lessee‘s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The amendments in this ASU leave lessor accounting largely unchanged, although certain targeted improvements were made to align lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model. This ASU simplifies the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessees will no longer be provided with a source of off-balance sheet financing. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU No. 2016-02 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company leases 111 buildings and offices under non-cancelable operating leases, the majority of which will be subject to this ASU. While the Company has not quantified the impact to its balance sheet, upon the adoption of this ASU the Company expects to report increased assets and increased liabilities on its Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as a result of recognizing right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to these leases and certain equipment under noncancelable operating lease agreements, which currently are not reflected in its Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-05, Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships . The amendments in this ASU clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under Topic 815 (Derivatives and Hedging) does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. The amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity has an option to apply the amendments in this ASU on either a prospective basis or a modified retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. At March 31, 2017, Banner had three swap relationships using hedge accounting with a total market value of $594,000. This ASU has not had a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06, Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments . The amendments in this ASU clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. To determine how to account for debt instruments with embedded features, including contingent put and call options, an entity is required to assess whether the embedded derivatives must be bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately. Part of this assessment consists of evaluating whether the embedded derivative features are clearly and closely related to the debt host. Under existing guidance, for contingently exercisable options to be considered clearly and closely related to a debt host, they must be indexed only to interest rates or credit risk. ASU 2016-06 addresses inconsistent interpretations of whether an event that triggers an entity’s ability to exercise the embedded contingent option must be indexed to interest rates or credit risk for that option to qualify as clearly and closely related. Diversity in practice has developed because the existing four-step decision sequence in ASC 815 focuses only on whether the payoff

was indexed to something other than an interest rate or credit risk. As a result, entities have been uncertain whether they should (1) determine whether the embedded features are clearly and closely related to the debt host solely on the basis of the four-step decision sequence or (2) first apply the four-step decision sequence and then also evaluate whether the event triggering the exercisability of the contingent put or call option is indexed only to an interest rate or credit risk. This ASU clarifies that in assessing whether an embedded contingent put or call option is clearly and closely related to the debt host, an entity is required to perform only the four-step decision sequence in ASC 815 as amended by this ASU. The entity does not have to separately assess whether the event that triggers its ability to exercise the contingent option is itself indexed only to interest rates or credit risk. The amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. This ASU has not had a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718)

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting . FASB issued this ASU as part of its Simplification Initiative. The areas for simplification in this ASU involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Amendments in this ASU relate to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value should be applied using a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted. Amendments related to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirement should be applied retrospectively. Amendments in this ASU require recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in the income statement and the practical expedient for estimating expected term should be applied prospectively. An entity may elect to apply the amendments in this ASU related to the presentation of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows using either a prospective transition method or a retrospective transition method. This ASU became effective for the Company on January 1, 2017 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326)

In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments . Current GAAP requires an “incurred loss” methodology for recognizing credit losses that delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. The main objective of this ASU is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The amendment affects loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial asset not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The amendments in this ASU replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments in this ASU require a financial asset (or group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset(s) to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The measurement of expected credit losses will be based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. The amendments in this ASU broaden the information that an entity must consider in developing its expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually. The use of forecasted information incorporates more timely information in the estimate of expected credit loss, which will be more decision useful to users of the financial statements. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is still evaluating the effects this ASU will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has formed an internal committee to oversee the project and is currently soliciting proposals from third party vendors to assist with the project. Upon adoption, the Company expects a change in the processes and procedures to calculate the allowance for loan losses, including changes in assumptions and estimates to consider expected credit losses over the life of the loan versus the current accounting practice that utilizes the incurred loss model. The new guidance may result in an increase in the allowance for loan losses which will also reflect the new requirement to include the nonaccretable principal differences on purchased credit impaired loans; however, the Company is still in the process of determining the magnitude of the increase and its impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, the current accounting policy and procedures for other-than-temporary impairment on investment securities available for sale will be replaced with an allowance approach. The Company has begun developing and implementing processes to address the amendments of this ASU.

Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments . There is diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230 and other Topics. This ASU addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. Those eight issues are 1) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, 2) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, 3) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, 4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, 5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies, 6) distributions received from equity method investees, 7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and 8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. Current GAAP either is unclear or does not include specific guidance on these eight cash flow classification issues. These amendments provide guidance for each of the eight issues,

thereby reducing current and potential future diversity in practice. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company elected to early adopt in the fourth quarter of 2016. This ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment . The amendments in this ASU are intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the goodwill impairment test by eliminating Step 2 from the that impairment test. The amendments modify the concept of impairment from the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value to the condition that exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity will perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company's annual or any interim goodwill impairment test in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is early adopting these amendments in 2017 and does not expect a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20)

In March 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities . The amendments in this ASU shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. Under current GAAP, premiums and discounts on callable debt securities generally are amortized to the maturity date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to the maturity date. The amendments in this ASU more closely align the amortization period of premiums and discounts to expectations incorporated in market pricing on the underlying securities. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is still evaluating the effects this ASU will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 3: SECURITIES

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of securities at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Trading:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	1,230						$	1,322
Municipal bonds	331							334
Corporate bonds	27,002							21,361
Mortgage-backed or related securities	1,610							1,617
Equity securities	14							119
	$	30,187						$	24,753
Available-for-Sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	90,843	$	236	$	(407	)	$	90,672
Municipal bonds	110,543		793		(791		)	110,545
Corporate bonds	10,535		70		(47		)	10,558
Mortgage-backed or related securities	986,010		2,961		(5,773		)	983,198
Asset-backed securities	28,728		37		(72		)	28,693
Equity securities	88		10		—			98
	$	1,226,747	$	4,107	$	(7,090	)	$	1,223,764
Held-to-Maturity:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	1,055	$	—	$	(11	)	$	1,044
Municipal bonds:	196,224		4,483		(1,173		)	199,534
Corporate bonds	3,839		—		—			3,839
Mortgage-backed or related securities	65,273		201		(489		)	64,985
	$	266,391	$	4,684	$	(1,673	)	$	269,402



	December 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Trading:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	1,230						$	1,326
Municipal bonds	331							335
Corporate bonds	26,959							21,143
Mortgage-backed or related securities	1,620							1,641
Equity securities	14							123
	$	30,154						$	24,568
Available-for-Sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	57,288	$	146	$	(456	)	$	56,978
Municipal bonds	110,487		455		(1,089		)	109,853
Corporate bonds	10,255		77		(49		)	10,283
Mortgage-backed or related securities	598,899		2,064		(6,251		)	594,712
Asset-backed securities	29,319		—		(326		)	28,993
Equity securities	88		10		—			98
	$	806,336	$	2,752	$	(8,171	)	$	800,917
Held-to-Maturity:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	1,065	$	—	$	(18	)	$	1,047
Municipal bonds:	196,989		4,173		(1,272		)	199,890
Corporate bonds	3,876		—		—			3,876
Mortgage-backed or related securities	65,943		309		(537		)	65,715
	$	267,873	$	4,482	$	(1,827	)	$	270,528

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the gross unrealized losses and the fair value for securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity aggregated by the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position was as follows (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Available-for-Sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	38,922	$	(398	)	$	821	$	(9	)	$	39,743	$	(407	)
Municipal bonds	51,717		(790		)	301		(1		)	52,018		(791		)
Corporate bonds	—		—			5,076		(47		)	5,076		(47		)
Mortgage-backed or related securities	546,336		(4,996		)	54,221		(777		)	600,557		(5,773		)
Asset-backed securities	9,955		(72		)	—		—			9,955		(72		)
	$	646,930	$	(6,256	)	$	60,419	$	(834	)	$	707,349	$	(7,090	)
Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	1,044	$	(11	)	$	—	$	—		$	1,044	$	(11	)
Municipal bonds	$	48,692	$	(1,169	)	$	203	$	(4	)	$	48,895	$	(1,173	)
Mortgage-backed or related securities	37,871		(489		)	—		—			37,871		(489		)
	$	87,607	$	(1,669	)	$	203	$	(4	)	$	87,810	$	(1,673	)

	December 31, 2016
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Available-for-Sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	39,043	$	(442	)	$	1,012	$	(14	)	$	40,055	$	(456	)
Municipal bonds	60,765		(1,087		)	556		(2		)	61,321		(1,089		)
Corporate bonds	5,206		(49		)	—		—			5,206		(49		)
Mortgage-backed or related securities	403,431		(5,604		)	47,467		(647		)	450,898		(6,251		)
Asset-backed securities	9,928		(101		)	19,064		(225		)	28,992		(326		)
	$	518,373	$	(7,283	)	$	68,099	$	(888	)	$	586,472	$	(8,171	)
Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	1,047	$	(18	)	$	—	$	—		$	1,047	$	(18	)
Municipal bonds	$	64,802	$	(1,267	)	$	204	$	(5	)	$	65,006	$	(1,272	)
Mortgage-backed or related securities	42,245		(537		)	—		—			42,245		(537		)
	$	108,094	$	(1,822	)	$	204	$	(5	)	$	108,298	$	(1,827	)

At March 31, 2017 , there were 234 securities—available-for-sale with unrealized losses, compared to 243 at December 31, 2016 . At March 31, 2017 , there were 43 securities—held-to-maturity with unrealized losses, compared to 73 at December 31, 2016 . Management does not believe that any individual unrealized loss as of March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016 represented other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI). The decline in fair market value of these securities was generally due to changes in interest rates and changes in market-desired spreads subsequent to their purchase.

There were no sales of securities—trading during the three months ended March 31, 2017 or March 31, 2016 . The Company did no t recognize any OTTI charges or recoveries on securities—trading during the three months ended March 31, 2017 , or the three months ended March 31, 2016 . There were no securities—trading in a nonaccrual status at March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016 . Net unrealized holding gains of $152,000 were recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2017 .

Sales of securities—available-for-sale totaled $2.2 million with a resulting net gain of $13,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 . Sales of securities—available-for-sale totaled $30.6 million with a resulting net gain of $21,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . There were no securities—available-for-sale in a nonaccrual status at March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016 .

There were no sales of securities—held-to-maturity during the three months ended March 31, 2017 or March 31, 2016 . There were no securities—held-to-maturity in a nonaccrual status at March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016 .

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at March 31, 2017 , by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because some securities may be called or prepaid with or without call or prepayment penalties.



	March 31, 2017
	Trading				Available-for-Sale				Held-to-Maturity
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Maturing in one year or less	$	1,741	$	1,750	$	23,099	$	23,082	$	1,957	$	1,964
Maturing after one year through five years	230		231		115,084		115,031		19,868		19,989
Maturing after five years through ten years	1,200		1,291		215,933		214,541		112,229		113,151
Maturing after ten years through twenty years	8,262		7,974		293,580		293,840		88,077		90,802
Maturing after twenty years	18,740		13,388		578,963		577,172		44,260		43,496
	30,173		24,634		1,226,659		1,223,666		266,391		269,402
Equity securities	14		119		88		98		—		—
	$	30,187	$	24,753	$	1,226,747	$	1,223,764	$	266,391	$	269,402

The following table presents, as of March 31, 2017 , investment securities which were pledged to secure borrowings, public deposits or other obligations as permitted or required by law (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
	Carrying Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Purpose or beneficiary:
State and local governments public deposits	$	145,600	$	145,472	$	147,942
Interest rate swap counterparties	24,233		24,280		24,138
Repurchase agreements	136,835		137,045		136,799
Other	1,673		1,681		1,673
Total pledged securities	$	308,341	$	308,478	$	310,552

Note 4: LOANS RECEIVABLE AND THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Loans receivable at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):



	March 31, 2017					December 31, 2016
	Amount			Percent of Total		Amount			Percent of Total
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	1,361,095		18.4	%	$	1,352,999		18.1	%
Investment properties	2,011,618			27.1		1,986,336			26.7
Multifamily real estate	254,246			3.4		248,150			3.3
Commercial construction	141,505			1.9		124,068			1.7
Multifamily construction	114,728			1.6		124,126			1.7
One- to four-family construction	366,191			4.9		375,704			5.0
Land and land development:
Residential	151,649			2.0		170,004			2.3
Commercial	29,597			0.4		29,184			0.4
Commercial business	1,224,541			16.5		1,207,879			16.2
Agricultural business, including secured by farmland	313,374			4.2		369,156			5.0
One- to four-family residential	802,991			10.8		813,077			10.9
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family	493,495			6.7		493,211			6.6
Consumer—other	156,225			2.1		157,254			2.1
Total loans	7,421,255			100.0	%	7,451,148			100.0	%
Less allowance for loan losses	(86,527		)			(85,997		)
Net loans	$	7,334,728				$	7,365,151

Loan amounts are net of unearned loan fees in excess of unamortized costs of $5.2 million as of March 31, 2017 and $5.8 million as of December 31, 2016 . Net loans include net discounts on acquired loans of $29.4 million and $31.1 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.

Purchased credit-impaired loans and purchased non-credit-impaired loans. Purchased loans, including loans acquired in business combinations, are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan and lease losses is not recorded at the acquisition date. Acquired loans are evaluated upon acquisition and classified as either purchased credit-impaired (PCI) or purchased non-credit-impaired. PCI loans reflect credit deterioration since origination such that it is probable at acquisition that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments. The outstanding contractual unpaid principal balance of PCI loans, excluding acquisition accounting adjustments, was $45.8 million at March 31, 2017 and $48.4 million at December 31, 2016 . The carrying balance of PCI loans was $30.5 million at March 31, 2017 and $32.3 million at December 31, 2016 .

The following table presents the changes in the accretable yield for PCI loans for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	8,717		$	10,375
Accretion to interest income	(1,320		)	(1,931		)
Disposals	—			(18		)
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference	1,273			2,291
Balance, end of period	$	8,670		$	10,717

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the non-accretable difference between the contractually required payments and cash flows expected to be collected were $14.9 million and $15.7 million , respectively.

Impaired Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and circumstances, the Company determines it is probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled interest payments. Factors involved in determining impairment include, but are not limited to, the financial condition of the borrower, the value of the underlying collateral and the current status of the economy. Impaired loans are comprised of loans on nonaccrual,

troubled debt restructures (TDRs) that are performing under their restructured terms, and loans that are 90 days or more past due, but are still on accrual. PCI loans are considered performing within the scope of the purchased credit-impaired accounting guidance and are not included in the impaired loan tables.

The following tables provide information on impaired loans, excluding PCI loans, with and without allowance reserves at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Recorded investment includes the unpaid principal balance or the carrying amount of loans less charge-offs and net deferred loan fees (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment				Related Allowance
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Without Allowance ⁽¹⁾		With Allowance ⁽²⁾		Related Allowance
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	2,895	$	2,461	$	202	$	19
Investment properties	8,734		4,449		4,284		399
Multifamily real estate	506		147		347		62
One- to four-family construction	1,180		—		1,180		156
Land and land development:
Residential	3,052		1,133		764		168
Commercial	1,588		978		—		—
Commercial business	3,377		2,700		630		62
Agricultural business/farmland	4,190		3,749		373		238
One- to four-family residential	10,114		3,386		6,665		229
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family	1,702		1,495		142		8
Consumer—other	164		87		78		3
	$	37,502	$	20,585	$	14,665	$	1,344

	December 31, 2016
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment				Related Allowance
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Without Allowance ⁽¹⁾		With Allowance ⁽²⁾		Related Allowance
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	3,786	$	3,373	$	203	$	20
Investment properties	9,916		5,565		4,304		408
Multifamily real estate	508		147		349		64
One- to four-family construction	1,180		—		1,180		156
Land and land development:
Residential	3,012		750		1,106		219
Commercial	1,608		998		—		—
Commercial business	3,753		3,074		651		69
Agricultural business/farmland	6,438		6,354		—		—
One- to four-family residential	11,439		3,149		8,026		479
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family	1,904		1,721		144		1
Consumer—other	391		226		166		4
	$	43,935	$	25,357	$	16,129	$	1,420


⁽¹⁾	Includes loans without an allowance reserve that have been individually evaluated for impairment and that evaluation concluded that no reserve was needed and $8.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively of homogenous and small balance loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment for which a general reserve has been established.


⁽²⁾	Loans with a specific allowance reserve have been individually evaluated for impairment using either a discounted cash flow analysis or, for collateral dependent loans, current appraisals less costs to sell to establish realizable value.

The following table summarizes our average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans by loan class for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017				Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	2,916	$	2	$	2,116	$	4
Investment properties	8,893		49		8,415		75
Multifamily real estate	495		4		356		4
One- to four-family construction	1,180		20		1,610		27
Land and land development:
Residential	1,899		17		1,988		10
Commercial	977		—		1,027		—
Commercial business	4,504		7		2,495		8
Agricultural business/farmland	6,282		32		1,215		5
One- to four-family residential	10,404		83		15,181		126
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family	1,742		3		1,042		3
Consumer—other	268		3		455		4
	$	39,560	$	220	$	35,900	$	266

Troubled Debt Restructures. Some of the Company’s loans are reported as TDRs. Loans are reported as TDRs when the bank grants one or more concessions to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties that it would not otherwise consider. Examples of such concessions include forgiveness of principal or accrued interest, extending the maturity date(s) or providing a lower interest rate than would be normally available for a transaction of similar risk. Our TDRs have generally not involved forgiveness of amounts due, but almost always include a modification of multiple factors; the most common combination includes interest rate, payment amount and maturity date. As a result of these concessions, restructured loans are impaired as the Company will not collect all amounts due, both principal and interest, in accordance with the terms of the original loan agreement. Loans identified as TDRs are accounted for in accordance with the Company's impaired loan accounting policies.

The following table presents TDRs by accrual and nonaccrual status at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Accrual Status		Nonaccrual Status		Total TDRs		Accrual Status		Nonaccrual Status		Total TDRs
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	202	$	94	$	296	$	203	$	96	$	299
Investment properties	4,284		—		4,284		4,304		—		4,304
Multifamily real estate	347		—		347		349		—		349
One- to four-family construction	1,180		—		1,180		1,180		—		1,180
Land and land development:
Residential	1,098		—		1,098		1,106		—		1,106
Commercial business	631		—		631		653		—		653
Agricultural business, including secured by farmland	3,111		79		3,190		3,125		79		3,204
One- to four-family residential	6,120		832		6,952		7,678		843		8,521
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family	142		4		146		143		6		149
Consumer—other	78		—		78		166		—		166
	$	17,193	$	1,009	$	18,202	$	18,907	$	1,024	$	19,931

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company had commitments to advance funds related to TDRs up to additional amounts of $147,000 and $127,000 , respectively.

No new TDRs occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016.

There were no TDRs which incurred a payment default within twelve months of the restructure date during the three -month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 . A default on a TDR results in either a transfer to nonaccrual status or a partial charge-off, or both.

Credit Quality Indicators : To appropriately and effectively manage the ongoing credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management has implemented a risk-rating or loan grading system for its loans. The system is a tool to evaluate portfolio asset quality throughout each applicable loan’s life as an asset of the Company. Generally, loans and leases are risk rated on an aggregate borrower/relationship basis with individual loans sharing similar ratings. There are some instances when specific situations relating to individual loans will provide the basis for different risk ratings within the aggregate relationship. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 9. A description of the general characteristics of these categories is shown below:

Overall Risk Rating Definitions : Risk-ratings contain both qualitative and quantitative measurements and take into account the financial strength of a borrower and the structure of the loan or lease. Consequently, the definitions are to be applied in the context of each lending transaction and judgment must also be used to determine the appropriate risk rating, as it is not unusual for a loan or lease to exhibit characteristics of more than one risk-rating category. Consideration for the final rating is centered in the borrower’s ability to repay, in a timely fashion, both principal and interest. There were no material changes in the risk-rating or loan grading system in the three months ended March 31, 2017 .

Risk Rating 1: Exceptional

A credit supported by exceptional financial strength, stability, and liquidity. The risk rating of 1 is reserved for the Company’s top quality loans, generally reserved for investment grade credits underwritten to the standards of institutional credit providers.

Risk Rating 2: Excellent

A credit supported by excellent financial strength, stability and liquidity. The risk rating of 2 is reserved for very strong and highly stable customers with ready access to alternative financing sources.

Risk Rating 3: Strong

A credit supported by good overall financial strength and stability. Collateral margins are strong; cash flow is stable although susceptible to cyclical market changes.

Risk Rating 4: Acceptable

A credit supported by the borrower’s adequate financial strength and stability. Assets and cash flow are reasonably sound and provide for orderly debt reduction. Access to alternative financing sources will be more difficult to obtain.

Risk Rating 5: Watch

A credit with the characteristics of an acceptable credit which requires, however, more than the normal level of supervision and warrants formal quarterly management reporting. Credits in this category are not yet criticized or classified, but due to adverse events or aspects of underwriting require closer than normal supervision. Generally, credits should be watch credits in most cases for six months or less as the impact of stress factors are analyzed.

Risk Rating 6: Special Mention

A credit with potential weaknesses that deserves management’s close attention is risk rated a 6. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses will result in deterioration in the capacity to repay debt. A key distinction between Special Mention and Substandard is that in a Special Mention credit, there are identified weaknesses that pose potential risk(s) to the repayment sources, versus well defined weaknesses that pose risk(s) to the repayment sources. Assets in this category are expected to be in this category no more than 9 - 12 months as the potential weaknesses in the credit are resolved.

Risk Rating 7: Substandard

A credit with well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the ability to repay in full is risk rated a 7. These credits are inadequately protected by either the sound net worth and payment capacity of the borrower or the value of pledged collateral. These are credits with a distinct possibility of loss. Loans headed for foreclosure and/or legal action due to deterioration are rated 7 or worse.

Risk Rating 8: Doubtful

A credit with an extremely high probability of loss is risk rated 8. These credits have all the same critical weaknesses that are found in a substandard loan; however, the weaknesses are elevated to the point that based upon current information, collection or liquidation in full is improbable. While some loss on doubtful credits is expected, pending events may strengthen a credit making the amount and timing of any loss indeterminable. In these situations taking the loss is inappropriate until it is clear that the pending event has failed to strengthen the credit and improve the capacity to repay debt.

Risk Rating 9: Loss

A credit that is considered to be currently uncollectible or of such little value that it is no longer a viable Bank asset is risk rated 9. Losses should be taken in the accounting period in which the credit is determined to be uncollectible. Taking a loss does not mean that a credit has absolutely no recovery or salvage value but, rather, it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off the credit, even though partial recovery may occur in the future.

The following tables present the Company’s portfolio of risk-rated loans and non-risk-rated loans by grade or other characteristics as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
By class:	Pass (Risk Ratings 1-5) ⁽¹⁾		Special		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total Loans
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	1,323,022	$	5,424	$	32,649	$	—	$	—	$	1,361,095
Investment properties	1,985,876		10,649		15,093		—		—		2,011,618
Multifamily real estate	253,100		—		1,146		—		—		254,246
Commercial construction	141,505		—		—		—		—		141,505
Multifamily construction	114,728		—		—		—		—		114,728
One- to four-family construction	362,563		—		3,628		—		—		366,191
Land and land development:
Residential	149,048		—		2,601		—		—		151,649
Commercial	25,682		—		3,915		—		—		29,597
Commercial business	1,154,776		15,937		53,828		—		—		1,224,541
Agricultural business, including secured by farmland	296,883		8,501		7,990		—		—		313,374
One- to four-family residential	796,664		942		5,385		—		—		802,991
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family	490,977		3		2,515		—		—		493,495
Consumer—other	155,763		80		382		—		—		156,225
Total	$	7,250,587	$	41,536	$	129,132	$	—	$	—	$	7,421,255



	December 31, 2016
By class:	Pass (Risk Ratings 1-5) ⁽¹⁾		Special		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total Loans
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	1,313,142	$	14,394	$	25,463	$	—	$	—	$	1,352,999
Investment properties	1,948,822		23,846		13,668		—		—		1,986,336
Multifamily real estate	247,258		—		892		—		—		248,150
Commercial construction	124,068		—		—		—		—		124,068
Multifamily construction	124,126		—		—		—		—		124,126
One- to four-family construction	371,636		—		4,068		—		—		375,704
Land and land development:
Residential	167,764		—		2,240		—		—		170,004
Commercial	25,090		—		4,094		—		—		29,184
Commercial business	1,148,585		35,036		24,258		—		—		1,207,879
Agricultural business, including secured by farmland	356,656		3,335		9,165		—		—		369,156
One- to four-family residential	807,837		967		4,273		—		—		813,077
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family	490,877		5		2,327		2		—		493,211
Consumer—other	156,547		108		594		5		—		157,254
Total	$	7,282,408	$	77,691	$	91,042	$	7	$	—	$	7,451,148

⁽¹⁾

The Pass category includes some performing loans that are part of homogenous pools which are not individually risk-rated. This includes all consumer loans, all one - to four -family residential loans and, as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , in the commercial business category, $242.3 million and $225.0 million , respectively, of credit-scored small business loans. As loans in these pools become non-performing, they are individually risk-rated.


⁽²⁾	Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and loans past due greater than 90 days and on accrual status.

The following tables provide additional detail on the age analysis of the Company’s past due loans as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Purchased Credit-Impaired		Current		Total Loans		Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing		Non-accrual
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	5,940	$	47	$	1,662	$	7,649	$	11,639	$	1,341,807	$	1,361,095	$	—	$	2,461
Investment properties	454		—		4,337		4,791		10,391		1,996,436		2,011,618		—		4,449
Multifamily real estate	—		—		147		147		174		253,925		254,246		—		147
Commercial construction	—		—		—		—		—		141,505		141,505		—		—
Multifamily construction	—		—		—		—		—		114,728		114,728		—		—
One-to-four-family construction	2,195		—		—		2,195		840		363,156		366,191		—		—
Land and land development:
Residential	1,107		335		798		2,240		—		149,409		151,649		—		798
Commercial	—		—		977		977		2,937		25,683		29,597		—		977
Commercial business	3,129		481		1,369		4,979		3,416		1,216,146		1,224,541		—		2,700
Agricultural business, including secured by farmland	1,660		—		787		2,447		725		310,202		313,374		—		1,012
One- to four-family residential	2,813		636		2,547		5,996		312		796,683		802,991		545		3,386
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family	1,161		—		816		1,977		11		491,507		493,495		297		1,198
Consumer—other	557		96		13		666		56		155,503		156,225		—		87
Total	$	19,016	$	1,595	$	13,453	$	34,064	$	30,501	$	7,356,690	$	7,421,255	$	842	$	17,215



	December 31, 2016
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Purchased Credit-Impaired		Current		Total Loans		Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing		Non-accrual
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	1,938	$	—	$	2,538	$	4,476	$	13,281	$	1,335,242	$	1,352,999	$	—	$	3,373
Investment properties	117		—		5,447		5,564		10,168		1,970,604		1,986,336		701		4,864
Multifamily real estate	—		—		147		147		139		247,864		248,150		147		—
Commercial construction	—		—		—		—		—		124,068		124,068		—		—
Multifamily construction	—		—		—		—		—		124,126		124,126		—		—
One-to-four-family construction	—		—		—		—		862		374,842		375,704		—		—
Land and land development:
Residential	48		—		750		798		—		169,206		170,004		—		750
Commercial	—		—		998		998		3,016		25,170		29,184		—		998
Commercial business	2,314		647		1,591		4,552		3,821		1,199,506		1,207,879		—		3,074
Agricultural business, including secured by farmland	360		1,244		2,768		4,372		684		364,100		369,156		—		3,229
One-to four-family residential	1,793		249		2,110		4,152		274		808,651		813,077		1,233		2,263
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family	932		160		986		2,078		18		491,115		493,211		61		1,660
Consumer—other	1,421		154		147		1,722		59		155,473		157,254		11		215
Total	$	8,923	$	2,454	$	17,482	$	28,859	$	32,322	$	7,389,967	$	7,451,148	$	2,153	$	20,426

The following tables provide additional information on the allowance for loan losses and loan balances individually and collectively evaluated for impairment at or for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):



	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Commercial Real Estate			Multifamily Real Estate		Construction and Land			Commercial Business			Agricultural Business			One- to Four-Family Residential			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	20,993		$	1,360	$	34,252		$	16,533		$	2,967		$	2,238		$	4,104		$	3,550	$	85,997
Provision for loan losses	(591		)	18		(4,871		)	4,688			324			(409		)	5			2,836		2,000
Recoveries	70			—		83			173			113			145			94			—		678
Charge-offs	—			—		—			(1,626		)	(159		)	—			(363		)	—		(2,148		)
Ending balance	$	20,472		$	1,378	$	29,464		$	19,768		$	3,245		$	1,974		$	3,840		$	6,386	$	86,527



	March 31, 2017
	Commercial Real Estate		Multifamily Real Estate		Construction and Land		Commercial Business		Agricultural Business		One- to Four-Family Residential		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	419	$	62	$	323	$	62	$	238	$	229	$	11	$	—	$	1,344
Collectively evaluated for impairment	20,053		1,316		29,122		19,706		3,007		1,745		3,829		6,386		85,164
Purchased credit-impaired loans	—		—		19		—		—		—		—		—		19
Total allowance for loan losses	$	20,472	$	1,378	$	29,464	$	19,768	$	3,245	$	1,974	$	3,840	$	6,386	$	86,527



Loan balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	9,506	$	347	$	4,006	$	2,710	$	3,815	$	6,653	$	220	$	—	$	27,257
Collectively evaluated for impairment	3,341,177		253,725		795,887		1,218,415		308,834		796,026		649,433		—		7,363,497
Purchased credit-impaired loans	22,030		174		3,777		3,416		725		312		67		—		30,501
Total loans	$	3,372,713	$	254,246	$	803,670	$	1,224,541	$	313,374	$	802,991	$	649,720	$	—	$	7,421,255



	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Commercial Real Estate			Multifamily Real Estate			Construction and Land		Commercial Business			Agricultural Business			One- to Four-Family Residential			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	20,716		$	4,195		$	27,131	$	13,856		$	3,645		$	4,732		$	902		$	2,831		$	78,008
Provision for loan losses	(842		)	(1,342		)	1,716		681			1,187			(2,574		)	2,822			(1,648		)	—
Recoveries	38			—			471		720			17			12			207			—			1,465
Charge-offs	(180		)	—			—		(139		)	(567		)	—			(390		)	—			(1,276		)
Ending balance	$	19,732		$	2,853		$	29,318	$	15,118		$	4,282		$	2,170		$	3,541		$	1,183		$	78,197



	March 31, 2016
	Commercial Real Estate		Multifamily Real Estate		Construction and Land		Commercial Business		Agricultural Business		One- to Four-Family Residential		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	578	$	68	$	382	$	60	$	—	$	557	$	9	$	—	$	1,654
Collectively evaluated for impairment	19,144		2,784		28,881		15,058		4,282		1,613		3,529		1,183		76,474
Purchased credit-impaired loans	10		1		55		—		—		—		3		—		69
Total allowance for loan losses	$	19,732	$	2,853	$	29,318	$	15,118	$	4,282	$	2,170	$	3,541	$	1,183	$	78,197



Loan balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	8,432	$	355	$	4,183	$	1,402	$	563	$	9,277	$	402	$	—	$	24,614
Collectively evaluated for impairment	3,086,549		304,982		624,022		1,216,477		338,356		901,156		636,572		—		7,108,114
Purchased credit impaired loans	38,296		1,682		3,925		7,036		1,431		286		615		—		53,271
Total loans	$	3,133,277	$	307,019	$	632,130	$	1,224,915	$	340,350	$	910,719	$	637,589	$	—	$	7,185,999

Note 5: REAL ESTATE OWNED, NET

The following table presents the changes in REO for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of the period	$	11,081		$	11,627
Additions from loan foreclosures	—			2
Additions from acquisitions	—			400
Proceeds from dispositions of REO	(9,193		)	(4,666		)
Gain on sale of REO	1,202			49
Valuation adjustments in the period	(50		)	(205		)
Balance, end of the period	$	3,040		$	7,207

REO properties are recorded at the estimated fair value of the property, less expected selling costs, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, REO properties are carried at the lower of the new cost basis or updated fair market values, based on updated appraisals of the underlying properties, as received. Valuation allowances on the carrying value of REO may be recognized based on updated appraisals or on management’s authorization to reduce the selling price of a property. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $917,000 of foreclosed one- to four-family residential real estate properties held as REO. The recorded investment in one- to four-family residential loans in the process of foreclosure was $1.1 million at March 31, 2017 compared with $715,000 at December 31, 2016.

Note 6: GOODWILL, OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: At March 31, 2017 , intangible assets are comprised of goodwill, CDI, and favorable leasehold intangibles (LHI) acquired in business combinations. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase considerations paid over the fair value of the assets acquired, net of the fair values of liabilities assumed in a business combination, and is not amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment. At December 31, 2016, the Company completed its qualitative assessment of goodwill and concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of Banner, the reporting unit, exceeds the carrying value. The adjustments to goodwill in 2016 relate to changes in the preliminary goodwill recorded for the merger of Banner Bank and AmericanWest Bank (AmericanWest) in October, 2015, including adjustments to loan discount, deferred taxes and REO valuations.

CDI represents the value of transaction-related deposits and the value of the customer relationships associated with the deposits. LHI represents the value ascribed to leases assumed in an acquisition in which the lease terms are favorable compared to a market lease at the date of acquisition. The Company amortizes CDI and LHI over their estimated useful lives and reviews them at least annually for events or circumstances that could impair their value.

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s goodwill and other intangibles for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	Goodwill			CDI			Favorable LHI			Total
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	247,738		$	36,762		$	710		$	285,210
Amortization	—			(7,061		)	(249		)	(7,310		)
Adjustments to goodwill	(3,155		)	—			—			(3,155		)
Balance, December 31, 2016	244,583			29,701			461			274,745
Amortization	—			(1,624		)	(50		)	(1,674		)
Balance, March 31, 2017	$	244,583		$	28,077		$	411		$	273,071

The following table presents the estimated amortization expense with respect to CDI for the periods indicated (in thousands):



	Estimated Amortization
Remainder of 2017	$	4,708
2018	5,609
2019	4,889
2020	4,169
2021	3,447
Thereafter	5,255
	$	28,077

Mortgage Servicing Rights: Mortgage servicing rights are reported in other assets. Mortgage servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value and are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. Mortgage servicing rights are subsequently evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights compared to the amortized cost (remaining unamortized initial fair value). If the fair value is less than the amortized cost, a valuation allowance is created through an impairment charge, which is recognized in servicing fee income on the consolidated statement of operations. However, if the fair value is greater than the amortized cost, the amount above the amortized cost is not recognized in the carrying value. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 , the Company did not record any impairment charges or recoveries against mortgage servicing rights. The unpaid principal balance for loans which mortgage servicing rights have been recorded totaled $2.09 billion and $2.05 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively. Custodial accounts maintained in connection with this servicing totaled $8.0 million and $10.3 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.

An analysis of our mortgage servicing rights for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 is presented below (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of the period	$	15,249		$	13,295
Additions—amounts capitalized	945			1,204
Amortization ⁽¹⁾	(922		)	(823		)
Balance, end of the period ⁽²⁾	$	15,272		$	13,676


⁽¹⁾	Amortization of mortgage servicing rights is recorded as a reduction of loan servicing income and any unamortized balance is fully amortized if the loan repays in full.


⁽²⁾	There was no valuation allowance as of March 31, 2017 and 2016 .

Note 7: DEPOSITS

Deposits consisted of the following at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Non-interest-bearing accounts	$	3,213,044	$	3,140,451
Interest-bearing checking	928,232		914,484
Regular savings accounts	1,592,023		1,523,391
Money market accounts	1,543,943		1,497,755
Total interest-bearing transaction and saving accounts	4,064,198		3,935,630
Certificates of deposit:
Certificates of deposit less than or equal to $250,000	992,896		884,403
Certificates of deposit greater than $250,000	151,822		160,930
Total certificates of deposit ⁽¹⁾	1,144,718		1,045,333
Total deposits	$	8,421,960	$	8,121,414
Included in total deposits:
Public fund transaction and savings accounts	$	206,243	$	221,765
Public fund interest-bearing certificates	31,024		25,650
Total public deposits	$	237,267	$	247,415
Total brokered deposits	$	171,521	$	34,074


⁽¹⁾	Certificates of deposit include $293,000 and $426,000 of acquisition premiums at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company had certificates of deposit of $154.3 million and $165.4 million , respectively, that were equal to or greater than $250,000.

Scheduled maturities and weighted average interest rates of certificate accounts at March 31, 2017 are as follows (dollars in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
	Amount		Weighted Average Rate
Maturing in one year or less	$	866,735	0.46	%
Maturing after one year through two years	138,626		0.75
Maturing after two years through three years	84,991		1.07
Maturing after three years through four years	24,832		1.17
Maturing after four years through five years	26,310		1.10
Maturing after five years	3,224		1.27
Total certificates of deposit	$	1,144,718	0.57	%

Note 8: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , whether or not measured at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (in thousands):



		March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Level	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	1	$	300,708	$	300,708	$	247,719	$	247,719
Securities—trading	2,3	24,753		24,753		24,568		24,568
Securities—available-for-sale	2	1,223,764		1,223,764		800,917		800,917
Securities—held-to-maturity	2,3	266,391		269,402		267,873		270,528
Loans held for sale	2	86,707		87,937		246,353		246,815
Loans receivable	3	7,421,255		7,303,871		7,451,148		7,337,608
FHLB stock	3	10,334		10,334		12,506		12,506
Bank-owned life insurance	1	159,948		159,948		158,936		158,936
Mortgage servicing rights	3	15,272		18,846		15,249		16,740
Derivatives:
Interest rate swaps	2	7,268		7,268		8,330		8,330
Interest rate lock and forward sales commitments	2	628		628		482		482
Liabilities:
Demand, interest checking and money market accounts	2	5,685,219		5,685,219		5,552,690		5,552,690
Regular savings	2	1,592,023		1,592,023		1,523,391		1,523,391
Certificates of deposit	2	1,144,718		1,127,412		1,045,333		1,028,866
FHLB advances	2	213		213		54,216		54,216
Other borrowings	2	120,245		120,245		105,685		105,685
Junior subordinated debentures	3	96,040		96,040		95,200		95,200
Derivatives:
Interest rate swaps	2	7,268		7,268		8,330		8,330
Interest rate lock and forward sales commitments	2	337		337		289		289

The Company measures and discloses certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale). GAAP establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. Among other things, the accounting standard requires the reporting entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s estimates for market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:


•	Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. An active market is a market in which transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available.


•	Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 including quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments, quoted prices in less active markets for identical or similar instruments, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data.

•

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation; also includes observable inputs from non-binding single dealer quotes not corroborated by observable market data.

The estimated fair value amounts of financial instruments have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize at a future date. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. In addition, reasonable comparability between financial institutions may not be likely due to the wide range of permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates that must be made given the absence of active secondary markets for certain financial instruments. This lack of uniform valuation methodologies also introduces a greater degree of subjectivity to these estimated fair values. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to occur at the end of the reporting period.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

The following tables present financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy of the fair value measurements for those assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Securities—trading
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	—	$	1,322	$	—	$	1,322
Municipal bonds	—		334		—		334
Corporate Bonds (Trust Preferred Securities)	—		—		21,361		21,361
Mortgage-backed or related securities	—		1,617		—		1,617
Equity securities	—		119		—		119
	—		3,392		21,361		24,753
Securities—available-for-sale
U.S. Government and agency obligations	—		90,672		—		90,672
Municipal bonds	—		110,545		—		110,545
Corporate bonds	—		10,558		—		10,558
Mortgage-backed or related securities	—		983,198		—		983,198
Asset-backed securities	—		28,693		—		28,693
Equity securities	—		98		—		98
	—		1,223,764		—		1,223,764

Loans held for sale	—		7,282		—		7,282

Derivatives
Interest rate swaps	—		7,268		—		7,268
Interest rate lock and forward sales commitments	—		628		—		628
	$	—	$	1,242,334	$	21,361	$	1,263,695

Liabilities:
Advances from FHLB	$	—	$	213	$	—	$	213
Junior subordinated debentures, net of unamortized deferred issuance costs	—		—		96,040		96,040
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps	—		7,268		—		7,268
Interest rate lock and forward sales commitments	—		337		—		337
	$	—	$	7,818	$	96,040	$	103,858



	December 31, 2016
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Securities—trading
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	—	$	1,326	$	—	$	1,326
Municipal bonds	—		335		—		335
Corporate Bonds (Trust Preferred Securities)	—		—		21,143		21,143
Mortgage-backed securities	—		1,641		—		1,641
Equity securities	—		123		—		123
	—		3,425		21,143		24,568
Securities—available-for-sale
U.S. Government and agency obligations	—		56,978		—		56,978
Municipal bonds	—		109,853		—		109,853
Corporate bonds	—		10,283		—		10,283
Mortgage-backed securities	—		594,712		—		594,712
Asset-backed securities	—		28,993		—		28,993
Equity securities	—		98		—		98
	—		800,917		—		800,917

Loans held for sale	—		9,600		—		9,600

Derivatives
Interest rate swaps	—		8,330		—		8,330
Interest rate lock and forward sales commitments	—		482		—		482
	$	—	$	822,754	$	21,143	$	843,897

Liabilities:
Advances from FHLB	$	—	$	54,216	$	—	$	54,216
Junior subordinated debentures, net of unamortized deferred issuance costs	—		—		95,200		95,200
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps	—		8,330		—		8,330
Interest rate lock and forward sales commitments	—		289		—		289
	$	—	$	62,835	$	95,200	$	158,035

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments above:

Cash and Cash Equivalents: The carrying amount of these items is a reasonable estimate of their fair value.

Securities: The estimated fair values of investment securities and mortgaged-backed securities are priced using current active market quotes, if available, which are considered Level 1 measurements. For most of the portfolio, matrix pricing based on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices is used to establish the fair value. These measurements are considered Level 2. Due to the continued limited activity in the trust preferred markets that have limited the observability of market spreads for some of the Company’s Trust Preferred Securities (TPS) securities, management has classified these securities as a Level 3 fair value measure. Management periodically reviews the pricing information received from third-party pricing services and tests those prices against other sources to validate the reported fair values.

Loans Held for Sale: Fair values for residential mortgage loans held for sale are determined by comparing actual loan rates to current secondary market prices for similar loans. Fair values for multifamily loans held for sale are calculated based on discounted cash flows using as a discount rate a combination of market spreads for similar loan types added to selected index rates.

Loans Receivable: Fair values are estimated first by stratifying the portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as multifamily real estate, residential mortgage, nonresidential mortgage, commercial/agricultural, consumer and other. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed- and adjustable-rate interest terms. A preliminary estimate of fair value is then calculated based on discounted cash flows using as a discount rate the current rate offered on similar products, plus an adjustment for liquidity to reflect the non-homogeneous nature of the loans. The preliminary estimate is then further reduced by the amount of the allowance for loan losses to arrive at a final estimate of fair value. Fair value for impaired loans is also based on recent appraisals or estimated cash flows discounted using rates commensurate with risk associated with the estimated cash flows. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows and discount rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower information.

FHLB Stock: The fair value is based upon the redemption value of the stock which equates to its carrying value.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance: The fair value of BOLI policies owned is based on the various insurance contracts' cash surrender value.

Mortgage Servicing Rights: Fair values are estimated based on an independent dealer analysis of discounted cash flows. The evaluation utilizes assumptions market participants would use in determining fair value including prepayment speeds, delinquency and foreclosure rates, the discount rate, servicing costs, and the timing of cash flows. The mortgage servicing portfolio is stratified by loan type and fair value estimates are adjusted up or down based on the serviced loan interest rates versus current rates on new loan originations since the most recent independent analysis.

Deposits: The carrying amount of deposits with no stated maturity, such as savings and checking accounts, is a reasonable estimate of their fair value. The market value of certificates of deposit is based upon the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is determined using current market rates on comparable instruments.

FHLB Advances: Fair valuations for Banner’s FHLB advances are estimated using fair market values provided by the lender, the FHLB of Des Moines. The FHLB of Des Moines prices advances by discounting the future contractual cash flows for individual advances, using its current cost of funds curve to provide the discount rate.

Junior Subordinated Debentures: The fair value of junior subordinated debentures is estimated using a discounted cash flow approach. The significant inputs included in the estimation of fair value are the credit risk adjusted spread and three month LIBOR. The credit risk adjusted spread represents the nonperformance risk of the liability. The Company utilizes an external valuation firm to validate the reasonableness of the credit risk adjusted spread used to determine the fair value. The junior subordinated debentures are carried at fair value which represents the estimated amount that would be paid to transfer these liabilities in an orderly transaction amongst market participants. Due to credit concerns in the capital markets and inactivity in the trust preferred markets that have limited the observability of market spreads, management has classified this as a Level 3 fair value measure.

Other Borrowings: Other borrowings include securities sold under agreements to repurchase and occasionally federal funds purchased and their carrying amount is considered a reasonable approximation of their fair value.

Derivatives: Derivatives include interest rate swap agreements, interest rate lock commitments to originate loans held for sale and forward sales contracts to sell loans and securities related to mortgage banking activities. Fair values for these instruments, which generally change as a result of changes in the level of market interest rates, are estimated based on dealer quotes and secondary market sources.

Off-Balance-Sheet Items: Off-balance-sheet financial instruments include unfunded commitments to extend credit, including standby letters of credit, and commitments to purchase investment securities. The fair value of these instruments is not considered to be material.

Limitations: The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The factors used in the fair values estimates are subject to change subsequent to the dates the fair value estimates are completed, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3):

The following table provides a description of the valuation technique, unobservable inputs, and qualitative information about the unobservable inputs for certain of the Company's assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 and measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



			Weighted Average Rate
Financial Instruments	Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Inputs	March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Corporate Bonds (TPS securities)	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	6.15	%	6.00	%
Junior subordinated debentures	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	6.15		6.00
Impaired loans	Collateral Valuations	Discount to appraised value	25	%	n/a
REO	Appraisals	Discount to appraised value	0% to 45%		0% to 45%

TPS securities : Management believes that the credit risk-adjusted spread used to develop the discount rate utilized in the fair value measurement of TPS securities is indicative of the risk premium a willing market participant would require under current market conditions for instruments with similar contractual rates and terms and conditions and issuers with similar credit risk profiles and with similar expected probability of default. Management attributes the change in fair value of these instruments, compared to their par value, primarily to perceived general market adjustments to the risk premiums for these types of assets subsequent to their issuance.

Junior subordinated debentures : Similar to the TPS securities discussed above, management believes that the credit risk-adjusted spread utilized in the fair value measurement of the junior subordinated debentures is indicative of the risk premium a willing market participant would require under current market conditions for an issuer with Banner's credit risk profile. Management attributes the change in fair value of the junior subordinated debentures, compared to their par value, primarily to perceived general market adjustments to the risk premiums for these types

of liabilities subsequent to their issuance. Future contractions in the risk adjusted spread relative to the spread currently utilized to measure the Company's junior subordinated debentures at fair value as of March 31, 2017 , or the passage of time, will result in negative fair value adjustments. At March 31, 2017 , the discount rate utilized was based on a credit spread of 500 basis points and three-month LIBOR of 115 basis points.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on a recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017
	Level 3 Fair Value Inputs
	TPS Securities		Borrowings—Junior Subordinated Debentures
Beginning balance	$	21,143	$	95,200
Total gains or losses recognized
Assets gains	218		—
Liabilities losses	—		840
Ending balance at March 31, 2017	$	21,361	$	96,040

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2016
	Level 3 Fair Value Inputs
	TPS Securities		Borrowings—Junior Subordinated Debentures
Beginning balance	$	18,699	$	92,480
Total gains or losses recognized
Assets gains	119		—
Liabilities losses	—		399
Purchases, issuances and settlements, including acquisitions	1,725		—
Ending balance at March 31, 2016	$	20,543	$	92,879

The Company has elected to continue to recognize the interest income and dividends from the securities reclassified to fair value as a component of interest income as was done in prior years when they were classified as available-for-sale. Interest expense related to the FHLB advances and junior subordinated debentures continues to be measured based on contractual interest rates and reported in interest expense. The change in fair market value of these financial instruments has been recorded as a component of non-interest income.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis:

The following tables present financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy of the fair value measurements for those assets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	680	$	680
REO	—		—		3,040		3,040

	December 31, 2016
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
REO	—		—		11,081		11,081

The following table presents the gains (losses) resulting from non-recurring fair value adjustments for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):



	Three months ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Impaired loans	$	—		$	(16	)
REO	(50		)	(205		)
Total gain (loss) from non-recurring measurements	$	(50	)	$	(221	)

Impaired loans : Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan's observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If this practical expedient is used, the impaired loans are considered to be held at fair value. Subsequent changes in the value of impaired loans are included within the provision for loan losses in the same manner in which impairment initially was recognized or as a reduction in the provision that would otherwise be reported. Impaired loans are periodically evaluated to determine if valuation adjustments, or partial write-downs, should be recorded. The need for valuation adjustments arises when observable market prices or current appraised values of collateral indicate a shortfall in collateral value compared to current carrying values of the related loan. If the Company determines that the value of the impaired loan is less than the carrying value of the loan, the Company either establishes an impairment reserve as a specific component of the allowance for loan losses or charges off the impaired amount. These valuation adjustments are considered non-recurring fair value adjustments. The remaining impaired loans are evaluated for reserve needs in homogenous pools within the Company’s methodology for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

REO : The Company records REO (acquired through a lending relationship) at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Fair value adjustments on REO are based on updated real estate appraisals which are based on current market conditions. All REO properties are recorded at the lower of the estimated fair value of the real estate, less expected selling costs, or the carrying amount of the defaulted loans. From time to time, non-recurring fair value adjustments to REO are recorded to reflect partial write-downs based on an observable market price or current appraised value of property. Banner considers any valuation inputs related to REO to be Level 3 inputs. The individual carrying values of these assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually and any additional impairment charges are expensed to operations.

Note 9: INCOME TAXES AND DEFERRED TAXES

The Company files a consolidated income tax return including all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries on a calendar year basis. Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this method, a deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the enacted tax rates which will be in effect when the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of existing assets and liabilities are expected to be reported in the Company’s income tax returns. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period of change. A valuation allowance is recognized as a reduction to deferred tax assets when management determines it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be available to offset future income tax liabilities.

Accounting standards for income taxes prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and also provide guidance on the de-recognition of previously recorded benefits and their classification, as well as the proper recording of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures and transition. The Company periodically reviews its income tax positions based on tax laws and regulations and financial reporting considerations, and records adjustments as appropriate. This review takes into consideration the status of current taxing authorities’ examinations of the Company’s tax returns, recent positions taken by the taxing authorities on similar transactions, if any, and the overall tax environment.

As of March 31, 2017 , the Company had an insignificant amount of unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions, none of which would materially affect the effective tax rate if recognized. The Company does not anticipate that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve months. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in the income tax expense. The Company files consolidated income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in the Oregon, California, Utah and Idaho state jurisdictions.

Tax credit investments: The Company invests in low income housing tax credit funds that are designed to generate a return primarily through the realization of federal tax credits. The Company accounts for these investments by amortizing the cost of tax credit investments over the life of the investment using a proportional amortization method and tax credit investment amortization expense is a component of the provision for income taxes.

The following table presents the balances of the Company’s tax credit investments and related unfunded commitments at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Tax credit investments	$	4,455	$	4,654
Unfunded commitments—tax credit investments	$	665	$	665

The following table presents other information related to the Company's tax credit investments for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Tax credits and other tax benefits recognized	$	285	$	284
Tax credit amortization expense included in provision for income taxes	$	199	$	168

Note 10: CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING FOR EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)

The following table reconciles basic to diluted weighted shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per share data (in thousands, except shares and per share data):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Net income	$	23,793	$	17,774

Basic weighted average shares outstanding	32,933,444		34,023,800
Plus unvested restricted stock	118,015		79,927
Diluted weighted shares outstanding	33,051,459		34,103,727
Earnings per common share
Basic	$	0.72	$	0.52
Diluted	$	0.72	$	0.52

Options to purchase an additional 5,000 shares of common stock were outstanding as of March 31, 2017 , but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise price was significantly greater than the average market price of common shares which would not dilute earnings per share. Also, as of March 31, 2017 , warrants expiring on November 21, 2018, to purchase up to $18.6 million ( 243,998 shares, post reverse-split) of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the warrants was greater than the average market price of common shares.

Note 11: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company operates the following stock-based compensation plans as approved by its shareholders:


•	2012 Restricted Stock and Incentive Bonus Plan (2012 Restricted Stock Plan).


•	2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2014 Plan).

The purpose of these plans is to promote the success and enhance the value of the Company by providing a means for attracting and retaining highly skilled employees, officers and directors of Banner Corporation and its affiliates and linking their personal interests with those of the Company's shareholders. Under these plans the Company currently has outstanding restricted stock share grants and restricted stock unit grants.

2012 Restricted Stock and Incentive Bonus Plan

Under the 2012 Restricted Stock Plan, which was initially approved on April 24, 2012, the Company is authorized to issue up to 300,000 shares of its common stock to provide a means for attracting and retaining highly skilled officers of Banner Corporation and its affiliates. Shares granted under the 2012 Restricted Stock Plan have a minimum vesting period of three years. The 2012 Restricted Stock Plan will continue in effect for a term of ten years, after which no further awards may be granted.

The 2012 Restricted Stock Plan was amended on April 23, 2013 to provide for the ability to grant (1) cash-denominated incentive-based awards payable in cash or common stock, including those that are eligible to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code and (2) restricted stock awards that qualify as qualified performance-based compensation for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. Vesting requirements may include time-based conditions, performance-based conditions, or market-based conditions.

As of March 31, 2017 , the Company had granted 272,741 shares of restricted stock from the 2012 Restricted Stock Plan (as amended and restated), of which 233,920 shares had vested and 38,821 shares remain unvested.

2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan

The 2014 Plan was approved by shareholders on April 22, 2014. The 2014 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, other stock-based awards and other cash awards, and provides for vesting requirements which may include time-based or performance-based conditions. The Company reserved 900,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under the 2014 Plan in connection with the exercise of awards. As of March 31, 2017 , 237,735 restricted stock shares and 26,154 restricted stock units have been granted under the 2014 Plan of which 66,721 restricted stock shares and 18,331 restricted stock units have vested.

The expense associated with all restricted stock grants (including restricted stock shares and restricted stock units) was $1.1 million and $1.1 million for the three -month periods ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 , respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense for these awards as of March 31, 2017 was $5.7 million and will be amortized over the next 34 months .

Note 12: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments — The Company leases 111 buildings and offices under non-cancelable operating leases. The leases contain various provisions for increases in rental rates, based either on changes in the published Consumer Price Index or a predetermined escalation schedule. Substantially all of the leases provide the Company with the option to extend the lease term one or more times following expiration of the initial term.

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk — The Company has financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk generated in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, commitments related to standby letters of credit, commitments to originate loans, commitments to sell loans, commitments to buy and sell securities. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk similar to the risk involved in on-balance-sheet items recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for on-balance-sheet instruments.

Outstanding commitments for which no asset or liability for the notional amount has been recorded consisted of the following at the dates indicated (in thousands):



	Contract or Notional Amount
	March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Commitments to extend credit	$	2,271,666	$	2,204,795
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees	14,646		17,694
Commitments to originate loans	62,555		69,833
Risk participation agreement	11,645		7,488

Derivatives also included in Note 14:
Commitments to originate loans held for sale	63,299		69,487
Commitments to sell loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties	34,198		36,907
Commitments to sell securities related to mortgage banking activities	33,500		44,000

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer, as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. The type of collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income producing commercial properties. The Company's reserve for unfunded loan commitments was $2.4 million and $3.6 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee a customer’s performance or payment to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Through the acquisition of AmericanWest, Banner Bank assumed a risk participation agreement. Under the risk participation agreement, Banner Bank guarantees the financial performance of a borrower on the participated portion of an interest rate swap on a loan.

Interest rates on residential one- to four-family mortgage loan applications are typically rate locked (committed) to customers during the application stage for periods ranging from 30 to 60 days, the most typical period being 45 days. Traditionally, these loan applications with rate lock commitments had the pricing for the sale of these loans locked with various qualified investors under a best-efforts delivery program at or near the time the interest rate is locked with the customer. The Bank then attempts to deliver these loans before their rate locks expired. This arrangement generally required delivery of the loans prior to the expiration of the rate lock. Delays in funding the loans required a lock extension.

The cost of a lock extension at times was borne by the customer and at times by the Bank. These lock extension costs have not had a material impact to our operations. The Company enters into forward commitments at specific prices and settlement dates to deliver either: (1) residential mortgage loans for purchase by secondary market investors (i.e., Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae), or (2) mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers. The purpose of these forward commitments is to offset the movement in interest rates between the execution of its residential mortgage rate lock commitments with borrowers and the sale of those loans to the secondary market investor. There were no counterparty default losses on forward contracts during the three months ended March 31, 2017 or March 31, 2016 . Market risk with respect to forward contracts arises principally from changes in the value of contractual positions due to changes in interest rates. The Company limits its exposure to market risk by monitoring differences between commitments to customers and forward contracts with market investors and securities broker/dealers. In the event the Company has forward delivery contract commitments in excess of available mortgage loans, the transaction is completed by either paying or receiving a fee to or from the investor or broker/dealer equal to the increase or decrease in the market value of the forward contract.

In the normal course of business, the Company and/or its subsidiaries have various legal proceedings and other contingent matters outstanding. These proceedings and the associated legal claims are often contested and the outcome of individual matters is not always predictable. These claims and counter-claims typically arise during the course of collection efforts on problem loans or with respect to action to enforce liens on properties in which the Banks hold a security interest. Based upon the information known to management at this time, the Company and the Banks are not a party to any legal proceedings that management believes would have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or consolidated financial position at March 31, 2017 .

In connection with certain asset sales, the Banks typically make representations and warranties about the underlying assets conforming to specified guidelines. If the underlying assets do not conform to the specifications, the Bank may have an obligation to repurchase the assets or indemnify the purchaser against any loss. The Banks believe that the potential for material loss under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, the fair value of such obligations is not material.

NOTE 13: DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

The Company, through its Banner Bank subsidiary, is party to various derivative instruments that are used for asset and liability management and customer financing needs. Derivative instruments are contracts between two or more parties that have a notional amount and an underlying variable, require no net investment and allow for the net settlement of positions. The notional amount serves as the basis for the payment provision of the contract and takes the form of units, such as shares or dollars. The underlying variable represents a specified interest rate, index, or other component. The interaction between the notional amount and the underlying variable determines the number of units to be exchanged between the parties and influences the market value of the derivative contract. The Company obtains dealer quotations to value its derivative contracts.

The Company's predominant derivative and hedging activities involve interest rate swaps related to certain term loans and forward sales contracts associated with mortgage banking activities. Generally, these instruments help the Company manage exposure to market risk and meet customer financing needs. Market risk represents the possibility that economic value or net interest income will be adversely affected by fluctuations in external factors such as market-driven interest rates and prices or other economic factors.

Derivatives Designated in Hedge Relationships

The Company's fixed rate loans result in exposure to losses in value or net interest income as interest rates change. The risk management objective for hedging fixed rate loans is to effectively convert the fixed rate received to a floating rate. The Company has hedged exposure to changes in the fair value of certain fixed rate loans through the use of interest rate swaps. For a qualifying fair value hedge, changes in the value of the derivatives are recognized in current period earnings along with the corresponding changes in the fair value of the designated hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged.

Under a prior program, customers received fixed interest rate commercial loans and the Banner Bank subsequently hedged that fixed rate loan by entering into an interest rate swap with a dealer counterparty. Banner Bank receives fixed rate payments from the customers on the loans and makes similar fixed rate payments to the dealer counterparty on the swaps in exchange for variable rate payments based on the one-month LIBOR index. Some of these interest rate swaps are designated as fair value hedges. Through application of the “short cut method of accounting,” there is an assumption that the hedges are effective. Banner Bank discontinued originating interest rate swaps under this program in 2008.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the notional values or contractual amounts and fair values of the Company's derivatives designated in hedge relationships were as follows (in thousands):



	Asset Derivatives								Liability Derivatives
	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016				March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value ⁽¹⁾		Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value ⁽¹⁾		Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value ⁽²⁾		Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value ⁽²⁾
Interest rate swaps	$	4,615	$	594	$	5,855	$	660	$	4,615	$	594	$	5,855	$	660


⁽¹⁾	Included in Loans receivable on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.


⁽²⁾	Included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Derivatives Not Designated in Hedge Relationships

Interest Rate Swaps: Banner Bank uses an interest rate swap program for commercial loan customers, that provides the client with a variable rate loan and enters into an interest rate swap in which the client receives a variable rate payment in exchange for a fixed rate payment. The Bank offsets its risk exposure by entering into an offsetting interest rate swap with a dealer counterparty for the same notional amount and length of term as the client interest rate swap providing the dealer counterparty with a fixed rate payment in exchange for a variable rate payment. These swaps do not qualify as designated hedges; therefore, each swap is accounted for as a free standing derivative.

Mortgage Banking: In the normal course of business, the Company sells originated mortgage loans into the secondary mortgage loan markets. During the period of loan origination and prior to the sale of the loans in the secondary market, the Company has exposure to movements in interest rates associated with written interest rate lock commitments with potential borrowers to originate loans that are intended to be sold and for closed mortgage loans held for sale that are awaiting sale and delivery into the secondary market. The Company economically hedges the risk of changing interest rates associated with these mortgage loan commitments by entering into forward sales contracts to sell residential mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers as specific prices and dates.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the notional values or contractual amounts and fair values of the Company's derivatives not designated in hedge relationships were as follows (in thousands):



	Asset Derivatives								Liability Derivatives
	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016				March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value ⁽¹⁾		Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value ⁽¹⁾		Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value ⁽²⁾		Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value ⁽²⁾
Interest rate swaps	$	317,027	$	6,674	$	309,936	$	7,670	$	317,027	$	6,674	$	309,936	$	7,670
Mortgage loan commitments	36,287		391		42,296		30		27,012		141		27,191		174
Forward sales contracts	34,198		237		71,192		452		33,500		196		9,715		115
	$	387,512	$	7,302	$	423,424	$	8,152	$	377,539	$	7,011	$	346,842	$	7,959


⁽¹⁾	Included in Other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, with the exception of those interest rate swaps that were not designated in hedge relationships (with a fair value of $727,000 at March 31, 2017 and $822,000 at December 31, 2016 ), which are included in Loans receivable.


⁽²⁾	Included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Gains (losses) recognized in income on derivatives not designated in hedge relationships for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):



	Location on Consolidated Statements of Operations	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Location on Consolidated Statements of Operations	2017			2016
Mortgage loan commitments	Mortgage banking operations	$	361		$	563
Forward sales contracts	Mortgage banking operations	(474		)	(273		)
		$	(113	)	$	290

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to these agreements. Credit risk of the financial contract is controlled through the credit approval, limits, and monitoring procedures and management does not expect the counterparties to fail their obligations.

In connection with the interest rate swaps between Banner Bank and the dealer counterparties, the agreements contain a provision where if Banner Bank fails to maintain its status as a well/adequately capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and Banner Bank would be required to settle its obligations. Similarly, Banner Bank could be required to settle its obligations under certain of its agreements if specific regulatory events occur, such as a publicly issued prompt corrective action directive, cease and desist order, or a capital maintenance agreement that required Banner Bank to maintain a specific capital level. If Banner Bank had breached any of these provisions at March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016 , it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position related to these agreements was $6.3 million and $7.6 million , respectively. The Company generally posts collateral against derivative liabilities in the form of cash, government

agency-issued bonds, mortgage-backed securities, or commercial mortgage-backed securities. Collateral posted against derivative liabilities was $28.9 million and $29.3 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.

Derivative assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and do not take into account the effects of master netting agreements. Master netting agreements allow the Company to settle all derivative contracts held with a single counterparty on a net basis and to offset net derivative positions with related collateral where applicable.

The following tables illustrate the potential effect of the Company's derivative master netting arrangements, by type of financial instrument, on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017
							Gross Amounts of Financial Instruments Not Offset in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
	Gross Amounts Recognized		Amounts offset in the Statement of Financial Condition		Net Amounts in the Statement of Financial Condition		Netting Adjustment Per Applicable Master Netting Agreements			Fair Value of Financial Collateral in the Statement of Financial Condition			Net Amount
Derivative assets
Interest rate swaps	$	7,268	$	—	$	7,268	$	(458	)	$	—		$	6,810
	$	7,268	$	—	$	7,268	$	(458	)	$	—		$	6,810

Derivative liabilities
Interest rate swaps	$	7,268	$	—	$	7,268	$	(458	)	$	(6,304	)	$	506
	$	7,268	$	—	$	7,268	$	(458	)	$	(6,304	)	$	506

	December 31, 2016
							Gross Amounts of Financial Instruments Not Offset in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
	Gross Amounts Recognized		Amounts offset in the Statement of Financial Condition		Net Amounts in the Statement of Financial Condition		Netting Adjustment Per Applicable Master Netting Agreements			Fair Value of Financial Collateral in the Statement of Financial Condition			Net Amount
Derivative assets
Interest rate swaps	$	8,330	$	—	$	8,330	$	(362	)	$	—		$	7,968
	$	8,330	$	—	$	8,330	$	(362	)	$	—		$	7,968

Derivative liabilities
Interest rate swaps	$	8,330	$	—	$	8,330	$	(362	)	$	(7,557	)	$	411
	$	8,330	$	—	$	8,330	$	(362	)	$	(7,557	)	$	411

ITEM 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Overview

We are a bank holding company incorporated in the State of Washington which owns two subsidiary banks, Banner Bank and Islanders Bank. Banner Bank is a Washington-chartered commercial bank that conducts business from its main office in Walla Walla, Washington and, as of March 31, 2017 , its 187 branch offices and 11 loan production offices located in Washington, Oregon, California, Utah and Idaho. Islanders Bank is a Washington-chartered commercial bank and conducts its business from three locations in San Juan County, Washington. Banner Corporation is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve Board). Banner Bank and Islanders Bank (the Banks) are subject to regulation by the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC). As of March 31, 2017 , we had total consolidated assets of $10.07 billion , total loans of $7.42 billion , total deposits of $8.42 billion and total shareholders’ equity of $1.32 billion .

Banner Bank is a regional bank which offers a wide variety of commercial banking services and financial products to individuals, businesses and public sector entities in its primary market areas. Islanders Bank is a community bank which offers similar banking services to individuals, businesses and public entities located in the San Juan Islands. The Banks’ primary business is that of traditional banking institutions, accepting deposits and originating loans in locations surrounding their offices in portions of Washington, Oregon, California, Utah and Idaho. Banner Bank is also an active participant in the secondary market, engaging in mortgage banking operations largely through the origination and sale of one- to four-family and multifamily residential loans. Lending activities include commercial business and commercial real estate loans, agriculture business loans, construction and land development loans, one- to four-family and multifamily residential loans and consumer loans.

Banner Corporation's successful execution of its super community bank model and strategic initiatives has delivered solid profitability and growth in recent years. We continue to execute on our goals to maintain the Company's moderate risk profile as well as to develop and continue strong earnings momentum. Highlights of this success have included maintaining strong asset quality, outstanding client acquisition and account growth, increased non-interest-bearing deposit balances and strong revenue generation from core operations.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , our net income was $23.8 million , or $0.72 per diluted share, compared to net income of $17.8 million , or $0.52 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 . Our net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 was negatively impacted by $6.8 million of acquisition-related expenses, which net of related tax benefits reduced earnings per diluted share by $0.13 . There were no acquisition-related expenses in the quarter ended March 31, 2017.

Highlights for the current quarter included additional client acquisition, solid asset quality, strong revenues from core operations, and growth in core deposits. Compared to the same quarter a year ago, we had a significant increase in net interest income as well as increases non-interest income, all reflecting the organic growth of the Company.

Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, consisting primarily of loans and investment securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, composed primarily of customer deposits, FHLB advances, other borrowings and junior subordinated debentures. Net interest income is primarily a function of our interest rate spread which is the difference between the yield earned on interest-earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, as well as a function of the average balances of interest-earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and non-interest-bearing funding sources including non-interest-bearing deposits. Our net interest income increased $3.8 million , or 4% , to $94.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $91.0 million for the same quarter one year earlier. This increase in net interest income reflects the organic growth in earning assets, the change in the mix of earning assets and continued strong net interest margin.

Our net income also is affected by the level of our non-interest income, including deposit fees and other service charges, results of mortgage banking operations, which includes loan origination and servicing fees and gains and losses on the sale of loans, and gains and losses on the sale of loans and securities, as well as our non-interest expenses, provisions for loan losses and income tax provisions. In addition, our net income is affected by the net change in the value of certain financial instruments carried at fair value.

Our total revenues (net interest income before the provision for loan losses plus total non-interest income) for the first quarter of 2017 increased $4.7 million , or 4% , to $115.7 million , compared to $111.0 million for the same period a year earlier, as a result of increased net interest income as well as increased deposit fees and service charges and increased miscellaneous income. Our total non-interest income, which is a component of total revenue and includes the net gain on sale of securities and changes in the value of financial instruments carried at fair value, was $20.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $20.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 .

Our total revenues, excluding changes in the fair value of financial instruments and the net gain on sale of securities, which we believe are more indicative of our core operations, also were strong at $116.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , a $5.4 million , or 5% , increase compared to $111.0 million for the same period a year earlier.

Our non-interest expense decreased in the first quarter of 2017 compared to a year earlier largely as a result of $6.8 million of acquisition-related expenses in the first quarter of 2016. Non-interest expense was $78.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $84.0 million for the same quarter a year earlier.

Although our credit quality metrics continue to reflect our moderate risk profile, we recorded a $2.0 million provision for loan losses in the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , primarily due to new loan originations and the renewal of acquired loans out of the discounted loan portfolios,

compared to a $2.0 million loan loss provision recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016 and no provision recorded for the comparable period a year ago. The allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2017 was $86.5 million , representing 479% of non-performing loans. Non-performing loans were $18.1 million at March 31, 2017 , compared to $22.6 million at December 31, 2016 and $15.6 million a year earlier. (See Note 5, Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses, as well as “Asset Quality” below in this Form 10-Q.)

During 2016 our strategy was to maintain assets below $10.0 billion through December 31, 2016. Remaining below $10.0 billion through the year end had the beneficial effect of delaying the adverse impact on our future operating results from certain enhanced regulatory compliance requirements and the Durbin Amendment cap on interchange fees. Beginning in 2017, we renewed our leveraging strategy resulting in a $274.7 million increase in total assets during the first quarter of 2017, further enhancing our revenue growth.

Non-GAAP financial measures: Non-interest income, revenues and other earnings information excluding fair value adjustments, OTTI losses or recoveries, gains or losses on the sale of securities and, in certain periods, acquisition-related costs are non-GAAP financial measures. Management has presented these and other non-GAAP financial measures in this discussion and analysis because it believes that they provide useful and comparative information to assess trends in our core operations and in understanding our capital position. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and are not a substitute for any analysis based on GAAP. Where applicable, we have also presented comparable earnings information using GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures, see the tables below. Because not all companies use the same calculations, our presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures as calculated by other companies. See “Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 ” for more detailed information about our financial performance.

The following tables set forth reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures discussed in this report (in thousands):



	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
REVENUE FROM CORE OPERATIONS:
Net interest income	$	94,854		$	91,043
Total non-interest income	20,845			19,959
Total GAAP revenue	115,699			111,002
Exclude net gain on sale of securities	(13		)	(21		)
Exclude change in valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value	688			(29		)
Revenue from core operations (non-GAAP)	$	116,374		$	110,952



NON-INTEREST INCOME FROM CORE OPERATIONS:
Total non-interest income (GAAP)	$	20,845		$	19,959
Exclude net gain on sale of securities	(13		)	(21		)
Exclude change in valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value	688			(29		)
Total non-interest income from core operations (non-GAAP)	$	21,520		$	19,909



EARNINGS FROM CORE OPERATIONS:
Net income (GAAP)	$	23,793		$	17,774
Exclude net gain on sale of securities	(13		)	(21		)
Exclude change in valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value	688			(29		)
Exclude acquisition related costs	—			6,813
Exclude related tax benefit	(243		)	(2,417		)
Total earnings from core operations (non-GAAP)	$	24,225		$	22,120
Diluted earnings per share (GAAP)	$	0.72		$	0.52
Diluted core earnings per share (non-GAAP)	$	0.73		$	0.65



	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
ACQUISITION ACCOUNTING IMPACT ON NET INTEREST MARGIN:
Net interest income (GAAP)	$	94,854		$	91,043
Exclude discount accretion on purchased loans	(1,777		)	(1,689		)
Exclude premium amortization on acquired certificates of deposit	(132		)	(461		)
Net interest income before acquisition accounting impact (non-GAAP)	$	92,945		$	88,893

Average interest-earning assets (GAAP)	$	9,050,953		$	8,868,264
Exclude average net loan discount on acquired loans	30,058			43,347
Average interest-earning assets before acquired loan discount (non-GAAP)	$	9,081,011		$	8,911,611

Net interest margin (GAAP)	4.25		%	4.13		%
Exclude impact on net interest margin from discount accretion	(0.08		)	(0.08		)
Exclude impact on net interest margin from certificates of deposit premium amortization	(0.01		)	(0.02		)
Exclude impact of net loan discount on average earning assets	(0.01		)	(0.02		)
Net margin before acquisition accounting impact (non-GAAP)	4.15		%	4.01		%



ADJUSTED EFFICIENCY RATIO
Non-interest expense (GAAP)	$	78,078		$	84,034
Exclude acquisition-related costs	—			(6,813		)
Exclude CDI amortization	(1,624		)	(1,808		)
Exclude B&O tax expense	(799		)	(838		)
Exclude REO gain (loss)	966			(397		)
Adjusted non-interest expense (non-GAAP)	$	76,621		$	74,178

Net interest income (GAAP)	$	94,854		$	91,043
Non-interest income (GAAP)	20,845			19,959
Total revenue	115,699			111,002
Exclude net gain on sale of securities	(13		)	(21		)
Exclude net change in valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value	688			(29		)
Adjusted revenue (non-GAAP)	$	116,374		$	110,952

Efficiency ratio (GAAP)	67.48		%	75.70		%
Adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP)	65.84		%	66.86		%

The ratio of tangible common shareholders’ equity to tangible assets is also a non-GAAP financial measure. We calculate tangible common equity by excluding goodwill and other intangible assets from shareholders’ equity. We calculate tangible assets by excluding the balance of goodwill and other intangible assets from total assets. We believe that this is consistent with the treatment by our bank regulatory agencies, which exclude goodwill and other intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios. Management believes that this non-GAAP financial measure provides information to investors that is useful in understanding the basis of our capital position (dollars in thousands).



TANGIBLE COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY TO TANGIBLE ASSETS
TANGIBLE COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY TO TANGIBLE ASSETS	March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016			March 31, 2016
Shareholders’ equity (GAAP)	$	1,323,404		$	1,305,710		$	1,320,155
Exclude goodwill and other intangible assets, net	273,071			274,745			280,409
Tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP)	$	1,050,333		$	1,030,965		$	1,039,746
Total assets (GAAP)	$	10,068,378		$	9,793,668		$	9,745,594
Exclude goodwill and other intangible assets, net	273,071			274,745			280,409
Total tangible assets (non-GAAP)	$	9,795,307		$	9,518,923		$	9,465,185
Common shareholders’ equity to total assets (GAAP)	13.14		%	13.33		%	13.55		%
Tangible common shareholders’ equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP)	10.72		%	10.83		%	10.98		%

TANGIBLE COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY PER SHARE
Tangible common shareholders' equity (non-GAAP)	$	1,050,333		$	1,030,965		$	1,039,746
Common shares outstanding at end of period	33,152,864			33,193,387			34,221,451
Common shareholders' equity (book value) per share (GAAP)	$	39.92		$	39.34		$	38.58
Tangible common shareholders' equity (tangible book value) per share (non-GAAP)	$	31.68		$	31.06		$	30.38

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to assist in understanding our financial condition and results of operations. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies

In the opinion of management, the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and related Consolidated Statements of Operations, Comprehensive Income, Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Cash Flows reflect all adjustments (which include reclassification and normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary for a fair presentation in conformity with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements.

Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, management has identified several accounting policies that, due to the judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, are critical to an understanding of our financial statements. These policies relate to (i) the methodology for the recognition of interest income, (ii) determination of the provision and allowance for loan losses, (iii) the valuation of financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, including OTTI losses, (iv) the valuation of intangibles, such as goodwill, core deposit intangibles and mortgage servicing rights, (v) the valuation of real estate held for sale, (vi) the valuation of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and subsequent recognition of related income and expense, and (vii) the valuation of or recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities. These policies and judgments, estimates and assumptions are described in greater detail below. Management believes the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements are appropriate based on the factual circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of the financial statements to these critical accounting policies, the use of other judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in our results of operations or financial condition. Further, subsequent changes in economic or market conditions could have a material impact on these estimates and our financial condition and operating results in future periods. There have been no significant changes in our application of accounting policies since December 31, 2016 . For additional information concerning critical accounting policies, see the Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the following:

Interest Income: (Notes 3 and 4) Interest on loans and securities is accrued as earned unless management doubts the collectability of the asset or the unpaid interest. Interest accruals on loans are generally discontinued when loans become 90 days past due for payment of interest and the loans are then placed on nonaccrual status. All previously accrued but uncollected interest is deducted from interest income upon transfer to nonaccrual status. For any future payments collected, interest income is recognized only upon management’s assessment that there is a strong likelihood that the full amount of a loan will be repaid or recovered. A loan may be put on nonaccrual status sooner than this policy would dictate if, in management’s judgment, the amounts owed, principal or interest, may be uncollectable. While less common, similar interest reversal and nonaccrual treatment is applied to investment securities if their ultimate collectability becomes questionable.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses: (Note 4) The provision for loan losses reflects the amount required to maintain the allowance for losses at an appropriate level based upon management’s evaluation of the adequacy of general and specific loss reserves. We have established systematic methodologies for the determination of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses. The methodologies are set forth in a formal policy and take into consideration the need for an overall general valuation allowance as well as specific allowances that are tied to individual problem loans. We increase our allowance for loan losses by charging provisions for probable loan losses against our income .

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for probable losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio and upon our continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. These factors include, among others, changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio, delinquency rates, actual loan loss experience, current and economic conditions, detailed analysis of individual loans for which full collectability may not be assured, and determination of the existence and realizable value of the collateral and guarantees securing the loans. Realized losses related to specific assets are applied as a reduction of the carrying value of the assets and charged immediately against the allowance for loan loss reserve. Recoveries on previously charged off loans are credited to the allowance for loan losses. The reserve is based upon factors and trends identified by us at the time financial statements are prepared. Although we use the best information available, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond our control. The adequacy of general and specific reserves is based on our continuing evaluation of the pertinent factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio as well as individual review of certain large balance loans. Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, we determine that it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors involved in determining impairment include, but are not limited to, the financial condition of the borrower, the value of the underlying collateral less selling costs and the current status of the economy. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Subsequent changes in the value of impaired loans are included within the provision for loan losses in the same manner in which impairment initially was recognized or as a reduction in the provision that would otherwise be reported. Large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment include residential real estate and consumer loans and, as appropriate, smaller balance non-homogeneous loans. Larger balance non-homogeneous residential construction and land, commercial real estate, commercial business loans and unsecured loans are individually evaluated for impairment.

Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of several key elements, which include specific allowances, an allocated formula allowance and an unallocated allowance. Losses on specific loans are provided for when the losses are probable and estimable. General loan loss reserves are established to provide for inherent loan portfolio risks not specifically provided for. The level of general reserves is based on analysis of potential exposures existing in our loan portfolio including evaluation of historical trends, current market conditions and other relevant factors identified by us at the time the financial statements are prepared. The formula allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans, excluding those loans that are subject to individual analysis for specific allowances. Loss factors are based on our historical loss experience adjusted for significant environmental considerations, including the experience of other banking organizations, which in our judgment affect the collectability of the loan portfolio as of the evaluation date. The unallocated allowance is based upon our evaluation of various factors that are not directly measured in the determination of the formula and specific allowances. This methodology may result in actual losses or recoveries differing significantly from the allowance for loan losses in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

While we believe the estimates and assumptions used in our determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will not be proven incorrect in the future, or that the actual amount of future provisions will not exceed the amount of past provisions or that any increased provisions that may be required will not adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of the Banks’ allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators as part of the routine examination process, which may result in the adjustment of reserves based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Fair Value Accounting and Measurement: (Note 8) We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain financial assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. We include in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements information about the extent to which fair value is used to measure financial assets and liabilities, the valuation methodologies used and the impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, for financial instruments not recorded at fair value we disclose, where appropriate, our estimate of their fair value. For more information regarding fair value accounting, please refer to Note 8 in the Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Acquired Loans: (Note 4) Purchased loans, including loans acquired in business combinations, are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded at the acquisition date. Acquired loans are evaluated upon acquisition and classified as either purchased credit-impaired or purchased non-credit-impaired. Purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans reflect credit deterioration since origination such that it is probable at acquisition that the Company will

be unable to collect all contractually required payments. The accounting for PCI loans is periodically updated for changes in cash flow expectations, and reflected in interest income over the life of the loans as accretable yield. Any subsequent decreases in expected cash flows attributable to credit deterioration are recognized by recording a provision for loan losses.

For purchased non-credit-impaired loans, the difference between the fair value and unpaid principal balance of the loan at the acquisition date is amortized or accreted to interest income over the life of the loans. Any subsequent deterioration in credit quality is recognized by recording a provision for loan losses.

Goodwill: (Note 6) Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase considerations paid over the fair value of the assets acquired, net of the fair values of liabilities assumed in a business combination and is not amortized but is reviewed annually, or more frequently as current circumstances and conditions warrant, for impairment. An assessment of qualitative factors is completed to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the qualitative analysis concludes that further analysis is required, then a quantitative impairment test would be completed. The quantitative goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step compares the reporting unit's estimated fair values, including goodwill, to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, then goodwill impairment may be indicated. The second step allocates the reporting units fair value to its assets and liabilities. If the unallocated fair value does not exceed the carrying amount of goodwill then an impairment loss would be recognized as a charge to earnings.

Other Intangible Assets: (Note 6) Other intangible assets consists primarily of core deposit intangibles (CDI), which are amounts recorded in business combinations or deposit purchase transactions related to the value of transaction-related deposits and the value of the customer relationships associated with the deposits. Core deposit intangibles are being amortized on an accelerated basis over a weighted average estimated useful life of eight years. These assets are reviewed at least annually for events or circumstances that could impact their recoverability. These events could include loss of the underlying core deposits, increased competition or adverse changes in the economy. To the extent other identifiable intangible assets are deemed unrecoverable, impairment losses are recorded in other non-interest expense to reduce the carrying amount of the assets.

Other intangibles also include favorable leasehold intangibles (LHI). LHI represents the value assigned to leases assumed in an acquisition in which the lease terms are favorable compared to a market lease at the date of acquisition. LHI is amortized over the underlying lease term and is reviewed at least annually for events or circumstances that could impair the value.

Mortgage Servicing Rights: (Note 6) Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or through sale of loans. Generally, purchased MSRs are capitalized at the cost to acquire the rights. For sales of mortgage loans, the value of the MSR is estimated and capitalized. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts. Capitalized MSRs are reported in other assets and are amortized into non-interest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets.

Real Estate Owned Held for Sale : (Note 5) Property acquired by foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure is recorded at the estimated fair value of the property, less expected selling costs. Development and improvement costs relating to the property may be capitalized, while other holding costs are expensed. The carrying value of the property is periodically evaluated by management and, if necessary, allowances are established to reduce the carrying value to net realizable value. Gains or losses at the time the property is sold are charged or credited to operations in the period in which they are realized. The amounts the Banks will ultimately recover from real estate held for sale may differ substantially from the carrying value of the assets because of market factors beyond the Banks’ control or because of changes in the Banks’ strategies for recovering the investment.

Income Taxes and Deferred Taxes : (Note 9) The Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries file consolidated U.S. federal income tax returns, as well as state income tax returns in Oregon, California, Idaho and Utah. Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this method a deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the enacted tax rates which are expected to be in effect when the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of existing assets and liabilities are expected to be reported in the Company’s income tax returns. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is “more likely than not” that all or a portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the existence, or generation, of taxable income in the periods when those temporary differences and net operating loss and credit carryforwards are deductible.

Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

General : Total assets increased $274.7 million , to $10.07 billion at March 31, 2017 , from $9.79 billion at December 31, 2016 . The increase in total assets reflects the re-leveraging of the balance sheet following our previously announced strategy to maintain total assets below $10.0 billion through December 31, 2016. The increase was largely the result of increases in securities which was primarily funded by an increase in total deposits.

Loans and lending: Loans are our most significant and generally highest yielding earning assets. We attempt to maintain a portfolio of loans in a range of 90% to 95% of total deposits to enhance our revenues, while adhering to sound underwriting practices and appropriate diversification guidelines in order to maintain a moderate risk profile. We offer a wide range of loan products to meet the demands of our customers. Our lending activities are primarily directed toward the origination of real estate and commercial loans. We had a $30.4 million decrease in net loans during the three months ended March 31, 2017, primarily reflecting seasonal factors and continuing repayments on one-to four-family loans.

At March 31, 2017 , our net loan portfolio totaled $7.33 billion compared to $7.37 billion at December 31, 2016 and $7.11 billion at March 31, 2016 .

The following table sets forth the composition of the Company's loans receivable by type of loan as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):



							Percentage Change
	Mar 31, 2017		Dec 31, 2016		Mar 31, 2016		Prior Yr End		Prior Year
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	1,361,095	$	1,352,999	$	1,328,034	0.60	%	2.49	%
Investment properties	2,011,618		1,986,336		1,805,243		1.27		11.43
Multifamily real estate	254,246		248,150		307,019		2.46		(17.19	)
Commercial construction	141,505		124,068		87,711		14.05		61.33
Multifamily construction	114,728		124,126		79,737		(7.57	)	43.88
One- to four-family construction	366,191		375,704		297,348		(2.53	)	23.15
Land and land development:
Residential	151,649		170,004		142,841		(10.80	)	6.17
Commercial	29,597		29,184		24,493		1.42		20.84
Commercial business	1,224,541		1,207,879		1,224,915		1.38		(0.03	)
Agricultural business including secured by farmland	313,374		369,156		340,350		(15.11	)	(7.93	)
One- to four-family real estate	802,991		813,077		910,719		(1.24	)	(11.83	)
Consumer:
Consumer secured by one- to four-family real estate	493,495		493,211		481,590		0.06		2.47
Consumer-other	156,225		157,254		155,999		(0.65	)	0.14
Total loans receivable	$	7,421,255	$	7,451,148	$	7,185,999	(0.40	)%	3.27	%

Our commercial real estate loans for both owner-occupied and investment properties totaled $3.37 billion , or 45% of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2017 . In addition, multifamily residential real estate loans totaled $254.2 million and comprised 3% of our loan portfolio. Commercial real estate loans increased by $33.4 million during the first three months of 2017 , while multifamily real estate loans increased by $6.1 million . While multifamily real estate loans remain a modest portion of our loan portfolio, originations and sales of multifamily real estate loans have made a significant contribution to our mortgage banking revenue.

We also originate construction, land and land development loans, which totaled $803.7 million , or 11% of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2017 . Our residential construction loans are a significant component of construction lending. Originations for residential construction loans have increased in recent years as builders have expanded production and experienced strong sales in many markets where we operate. We have also experienced a meaningful increase in originations of construction loans for owner occupants, although construction balances for these loans are modest as the loans convert to one- to four-family real estate loans upon completion of the homes and are often sold in the secondary market. Reflecting normal seasonal trends as well as particularly wet weather patterns which hampered construction and development activities, outstanding residential construction, land and land development balances decreased $27.9 million , or 5% , to $517.8 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $545.7 million at December 31, 2016 but increased $77.7 million , or 18% , compared to $440.2 million at March 31, 2016 . Residential construction, land and land development loans represented approximately 7% of our total loan portfolio at March 31, 2017 .

Our commercial business lending is directed toward meeting the credit and related deposit needs of various small- to medium-sized business and agribusiness borrowers operating in our primary market areas. In recent years, our commercial business lending has also included participation in certain syndicated loans, including shared national credits, which totaled $117.2 million at March 31, 2017 . Our commercial and agricultural business loans decreased $39.1 million , or 2% , to $1.54 billion at March 31, 2017 , compared to $1.58 billion at December 31, 2016 , and decreased $27.4 million , or 2% , compared to $1.57 billion at March 31, 2016 , in each comparison primarily reflecting decreased agricultural loan balances. Commercial and agricultural business loans represented approximately 21% of our portfolio at March 31, 2017 .

Our one- to four-family real estate loan originations have been relatively strong in recent years, as exceptionally low interest rates have supported demand for loans to refinance existing debt as well as loans to finance home purchases. We are active originators of one- to four-family real estate loans in most communities where we have established offices in Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho and Utah. Most of the one- to four-family real estate loans that we originate are sold in the secondary markets with net gains on sales and loan servicing fees reflected in our revenues from mortgage banking. At March 31, 2017 , our outstanding balances of one- to four-family real estate loans decreased $10.1 million , or 1% , to $803.0 million , compared to $813.1 million at December 31, 2016 , and decreased $107.7 million , or 12% , compared to $910.7 million at March 31, 2016 . One- to four-family real estate loans represented 11% of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2017 .

Our consumer loan activity is primarily directed at meeting demand from our existing deposit customers. Demand for consumer loans has continued to be modest in recent years, as we believe many consumers have been focused on reducing their personal debt. At March 31, 2017 ,

consumer loans, including consumer loans secured by one- to four-family residences, decreased $745,000 to $649.7 million , compared to $650.5 million at December 31, 2016 , but increased $12.1 million compared to $637.6 million at March 31, 2016 .

The following table presents loans by geographic concentration at March 31, 2017 , December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016				March 31, 2016
	Amount		Percentage		Amount		Percentage		Amount		Percentage
Washington	$	3,401,005	45.8	%	$	3,433,617	46.1	%	$	3,333,912	46.4	%
Oregon	1,493,054		20.1		1,505,369		20.2		1,420,749		19.8
California	1,255,597		16.9		1,239,989		16.6		1,173,203		16.3
Idaho	471,519		6.4		495,992		6.7		493,905		6.9
Utah	281,379		3.8		283,890		3.8		289,082		4.0
Other	518,701		7.0		492,291		6.6		475,148		6.6
Total loans receivable	$	7,421,255	100.0	%	$	7,451,148	100.0	%	$	7,185,999	100.0	%

Loans held for sale decreased significantly to $86.7 million at March 31, 2017, compared to $246.4 million at December 31, 2016, largely due to the sale of $200.7 million of multifamily loans. Loans held for sale were $47.5 million at March 31, 2016. Loans held for sale at March 31, 2017 included $72.5 million of multifamily loans and $14.2 million of one- to four-family loans.

Investment Securities: Our total investment in securities increased $421.6 million from December 31, 2016 to $1.51 billion at March 31, 2017 . Security purchases during the three -month period exceeded sales, paydowns and maturities reflecting the Company's re-leveraged balance sheet following the previously announced strategy to remain below $10 billion in assets through December 31, 2016 . Purchases were primarily in mortgage-backed or related securities issued by government-sponsored entities. The average effective duration of Banner's securities portfolio was approximately 3.8 years at March 31, 2017 . Net fair value adjustments to the portfolio of securities held for trading, which are included in net income, were an increase of $152,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 . In addition, fair value adjustments for securities designated as available-for-sale reflected an increase of $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , which was included net of the associated tax expense of $881,000 as a component of other comprehensive income and largely occurred as a result of modestly decreased market interest rates. (See Note 8 of the Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.)

Deposits: Deposits, customer retail repurchase agreements and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. We compete with other financial institutions and financial intermediaries in attracting deposits and we generally attract deposits within our primary market areas. Increasing core deposits (transaction and savings accounts) is a fundamental element of our business strategy. Much of the focus of our branch expansion over many years, including our recent acquisitions, and current marketing efforts has been directed toward attracting additional deposit customer relationships and balances. This effort has been particularly directed towards remixing our deposits away from higher cost certificates of deposit and emphasizing core deposit activity in non-interest-bearing and other transaction and savings accounts. The long-term success of our deposit gathering activities is reflected not only in the growth of core deposit balances, but also in increases in the level of deposit fees, service charges and other payment processing revenues compared to prior periods.

The following table sets forth the Company's deposits by type of deposit account as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):



							Percentage Change
	Mar 31, 2017		Dec 31, 2016		Mar 31, 2016		Prior Yr End		Prior Year
Non-interest-bearing	$	3,213,044	$	3,140,451	$	3,036,330	2.31	%	5.82	%
Interest-bearing checking	928,232		914,484		767,460		1.50		20.95
Regular savings accounts	1,592,023		1,523,391		1,327,558		4.51		19.92
Money market accounts	1,543,943		1,497,755		1,610,640		3.08		(4.14	)
Interest-bearing transaction & savings accounts	4,064,198		3,935,630		3,705,658		3.27		9.68
Interest-bearing certificates	1,144,718		1,045,333		1,287,873		9.51		(11.12	)
Total deposits	$	8,421,960	$	8,121,414	$	8,029,861	3.70	%	4.88	%

Total deposits were $8.42 billion at March 31, 2017 , compared to $8.12 billion at December 31, 2016 and $8.03 billion a year ago. The increase in total deposits compared to December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2016 reflects meaningful organic growth in the total balances and number of client relationships. Non-interest-bearing account balances increased 2% to $3.21 billion at March 31, 2017 , compared to $3.14 billion at December 31, 2016 , and increased 6% compared to $3.04 billion a year ago. Interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts increased 3% to $4.06 billion at March 31, 2017 , compared to $3.94 billion at December 31, 2016 , and increased 10% compared to $3.71 billion a year ago. Certificates of deposit increased 10% to $1.14 billion at March 31, 2017 , compared to $1.05 billion at December 31, 2016 and decreased 11%

compared to $1.29 billion a year earlier. Brokered deposits totaled $171.5 million at March 31, 2017, compared to $34.1 million at December 31, 2016 and $135.6 million a year ago. Brokered deposits increased in the current quarter in connection with our purchases of investment securities. Core deposits represented 86% of total deposits at March 31, 2017 , compared to 84% of total deposits a year earlier.

The following table presents deposits by geographic concentration at March 31, 2017 , December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2016 (in thousands):



	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016				March 31, 2016
	Amount		Percentage		Amount		Percentage		Amount		Percentage
Washington	$	4,619,457	54.9	%	$	4,347,644	53.6	%	$	4,209,332	52.4	%
Oregon	1,746,143		20.7		1,708,973		21.0		1,668,421		20.8
California	1,469,351		17.4		1,469,748		18.1		1,565,326		19.5
Idaho	429,850		5.1		447,019		5.5		428,681		5.3
Utah	157,159		1.9		148,030		1.8		158,101		2.0
Total deposits	$	8,421,960	100.0	%	$	8,121,414	100.0	%	$	8,029,861	100.0	%

Borrowings: FHLB advances decreased to $213,000 at March 31, 2017 from $54.2 million at December 31, 2016 as increased deposits were used to fund a larger portion of the balance sheet. Other borrowings, consisting of retail repurchase agreements primarily related to customer cash management accounts, increased $14.6 million , or 14% , to $120.2 million at March 31, 2017 , compared to $105.7 million at December 31, 2016 . No additional junior subordinated debentures were issued or matured during the three months ended March 31, 2017 ; however, the estimated fair value of these instruments increased by $840,000 . Junior subordinated debentures totaled $96.0 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $95.2 million at December 31, 2016 .

Shareholders' Equity: Total shareholders' equity increased $17.7 million , or 1% , to $1.32 billion at March 31, 2017 compared to $1.31 billion at December 31, 2016 . The increase in equity primarily reflects the year-to-date net income of $23.8 million , reduced by the accrual of $8.3 million of dividends to common shareholders. In addition, there was an improvement of $1.6 million in accumulated other comprehensive income representing unrealized gains, net of tax, on securities available-for-sale. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , we did not have any repurchases of our common stock as part of our publicly announced repurchase plan, but 26,303 shares of restricted stock were forfeited and 14,571 of shares were surrendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock grants. (See Part II, Item 2, "Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds" in this Form 10-Q.) Tangible common shareholders' equity, which excludes intangible assets, increased $19.4 million to $1.05 billion , or 10.72% of tangible assets at March 31, 2017 , compared to $1.03 billion , or 10.83% of tangible assets at December 31, 2016 .

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

For the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , net income was $23.8 million , or $0.72 per diluted share. This compares to net income of $17.8 million , or $0.52 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 . Our net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 was negatively impacted by $6.8 million of acquisition-related expenses, which net of related tax benefits reduced earnings $0.13 per diluted share.

Growth in average earning assets, coupled with a strong net interest margin, produced increased net interest income. This combined with an increase in non-interest income, resulted in an increase in revenues from core operations in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same quarter a year earlier. Credit costs remained low in both periods, while non-interest expense decreased compared to the same quarter a year ago, as the prior year quarter included acquisition related expenses. Net income for the current quarter was solid, representing further progress on our strategic priorities and initiatives, and produced an annualized return on average assets of 0.97% for the current quarter.

Our earnings from core operations, which excludes net gains or losses on sales of securities, changes in the valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value, acquisition-related costs, and related tax benefits, were $24.2 million , or $0.73 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $22.1 million , or $0.65 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 .

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $3.8 million , or 4% , to $94.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $91.0 million for the same quarter one year earlier, as an increase of $182.7 million in the average balance of interest-earning assets produced strong growth for this key source of revenue. Net interest margin was enhanced by the amortization of acquisition accounting discounts on purchased loans received in the acquisitions, which is accreted into loan interest income, as well as by net premiums on non-market-rate certificates of deposit assumed, which are amortized as a reduction to deposit interest expense. The net interest margin of 4.25% for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 included eight basis points as a result of accretion from acquisition accounting loan discounts, one basis point from the amortization of deposit premiums and one basis point as a result of the impact of the net loan acquisition discounts on average earning assets. This compares to net interest margin of 4.13% for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 , which included 10 basis points from acquisition accounting adjustments. Excluding the effects of acquisition accounting, the net interest margin was 4.15% in the first quarter and 4.01% in the same quarter a year ago. The increase compared to a year earlier primarily reflects higher average loan yields as well as the loan portfolio representing a proportionally larger portion of the average interest-earning asset mix.

Interest Income. Interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 was $99.1 million , compared to $95.3 million for the same quarter in the prior year, an increase of $3.8 million , or 4% . The increase in interest income occurred primarily as a result of an increase in the average balances of interest-earning assets, as the growth in average loans offset the decline in average investment securities. The average balance of interest-earning assets was $9.05 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $8.87 billion for the same period a year earlier. The yield on average interest-earning assets was 4.44% for quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to 4.32% for the same quarter one year earlier. The increase in yield between periods reflects a two basis point increase in the average yield on loans as well as a 19 basis point increase in the average yield on investment securities, and was enhanced by a change in the mix of interest-earning assets to include proportionately more loans. Average loans receivable for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 increased $386.5 million , or 5% , to $7.71 billion , compared to $7.32 billion for the same quarter in the prior year. Interest income on loans increased by $4.3 million , or 5% , to $91.3 million for the current quarter from $87.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 , reflecting the impact of the increase in average loan balances and the two basis point change in the average yield on loans. The increase in loan yields reflects the impact of higher Prime and Libor rates as well as changes in the loan portfolio. The acquisition accounting loan discount accretion and the related balance sheet impact added 11 basis points to the current quarter loan yield, compared to 12 basis points for the same quarter one year earlier.

The combined average balance of mortgage-backed securities, other investment securities, daily interest-bearing deposits and FHLB stock (total investment securities or combined portfolio) decreased to $1.34 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (excluding the effect of fair value adjustments), compared to $1.55 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 ; and the interest and dividend income from those investments decreased by $535,000 compared to the same quarter in the prior year. The average yield on the combined portfolio increased to 2.36% for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , from 2.17% for the same quarter one year earlier due to recent purchases at higher yields.

Interest Expense. Interest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 was $4.2 million , compared to $4.3 million for the same quarter in the prior year. The consistent interest expense between periods reflects only a slight change in the average balance of funding liabilities and no change in the average cost of all funding liabilities.

Deposit interest expense decreased $155,000 , or 5% , to $2.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $2.9 million for the same quarter in the prior year, as a result of decrease in the average cost of deposits. Average deposit balances increased to $8.21 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , from $7.98 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 , while the average rate paid on deposit balances decreased to 0.14% in the first quarter of 2017 from 0.15% for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 , reflecting the significant increase in average non-interest-bearing deposits. The acquisition accounting amortization of deposit premiums reduced the average rate paid on deposit balances by one basis point for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to two basis points for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 . The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased by one basis point to 0.22% for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 compared to 0.23% in the same quarter a year earlier. Deposit costs are significantly affected by changes in the level of market interest rates; however, changes in the average rate paid for interest-bearing deposits frequently tend to lag changes in market interest rates and were not meaningfully impacted by the increase in short-term rates following the change in the Fed Funds target rate in December 2016 and March 2017. Further, continuing changes in our deposit mix, especially growth in lower cost transaction and savings accounts, in particular non-interest-bearing deposits, through organic growth meaningfully contributed to the decrease in our deposit costs.

Average total borrowings were $378.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $412.3 million for the same quarter one year earlier, while the average rate paid on total borrowings for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 increased to 1.55% from 1.28% for the same quarter one year earlier. The decrease in the average balance was primarily due to a $38.9 million decrease in average FHLB advances which reflects our funding a larger portion of the balance sheet with deposits. The decrease in average balances was offset by the increase in the average rate paid on total borrowings. Interest expense on total borrowings increased to $1.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 from $1.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 .

Analysis of Net Interest Spread . The following tables present for the periods indicated our condensed average balance sheet information, together with interest income and yields earned on average interest-earning assets and interest expense and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities with additional comparative data on our operating performance (dollars in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017						Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Average Balance		Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Cost ⁽³⁾		Average Balance		Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Cost ⁽³⁾
Interest-earning assets:
Mortgage loans	$	6,104,779	$	72,549	4.82	%	$	5,707,882	$	68,743	4.84	%
Commercial/agricultural loans	1,464,532		16,546		4.58		1,471,638		16,025		4.38
Consumer and other loans	138,033		2,193		6.44		141,361		2,190		6.23
Total loans ⁽¹⁾	7,707,344		91,288		4.80		7,320,881		86,958		4.78
Mortgage-backed securities	842,071		4,647		2.24		1,004,836		5,390		2.16
Other securities	453,793		3,037		2.71		421,241		2,772		2.65
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	32,195		93		1.17		103,775		101		0.39
FHLB stock	15,550		31		0.81		17,531		80		1.84
Total investment securities	1,343,609		7,808		2.36		1,547,383		8,343		2.17
Total interest-earning assets	9,050,953		99,096		4.44		8,868,264		95,301		4.32
Non-interest-earning assets	923,165						900,296
Total assets	$	9,974,118					$	9,768,560
Deposits:
Interest-bearing checking accounts	$	896,764	200		0.09		$	934,072	196		0.08
Savings accounts	1,557,734		523		0.14		1,307,369		423		0.13
Money market accounts	1,522,470		651		0.17		1,620,524		862		0.21
Certificates of deposit	1,089,316		1,417		0.53		1,328,741		1,465		0.44
Total interest-bearing deposits	5,066,284		2,791		0.22		5,190,706		2,946		0.23
Non-interest-bearing deposits	3,148,520		—		—		2,788,372		—		—
Total deposits	8,214,804		2,791		0.14		7,979,078		2,946		0.15
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
FHLB advances	130,274		273		0.85		169,204		279		0.66
Other borrowings	108,091		74		0.28		102,865		75		0.29
Junior subordinated debentures	140,212		1,104		3.19		140,212		958		2.75
Total borrowings	378,577		1,451		1.55		412,281		1,312		1.28
Total funding liabilities	8,593,381		4,242		0.20		8,391,359		4,258		0.20
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities ⁽²⁾	58,489						63,014
Total liabilities	8,651,870						8,454,373
Shareholders’ equity	1,322,248						1,314,187
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	9,974,118					$	9,768,560
Net interest income/rate spread			$	94,854	4.24	%			$	91,043	4.12	%
Net interest margin					4.25	%					4.13	%
Additional Key Financial Ratios:
Return on average assets					0.97	%					0.73	%
Return on average equity					7.30						5.44
Average equity / average assets					13.26						13.45
Average interest-earning assets / average interest-bearing liabilities					166.23						158.28
Average interest-earning assets / average funding liabilities					105.32						105.68
Non-interest income / average assets					0.85						0.82
Non-interest expense / average assets					3.17						3.46
Efficiency ratio ⁽⁴⁾					67.48						75.70
Adjusted efficiency ratio ⁽⁵⁾					65.84						66.86


⁽¹⁾	Average balances include loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis and loans 90 days or more past due. Amortization of net deferred loan fees/costs is included with interest on loans.


⁽²⁾	Average other non-interest-bearing liabilities include fair value adjustments related to FHLB advances and junior subordinated debentures.


⁽³⁾	Yields and costs have not been adjusted for the effect of tax-exempt interest.


⁽⁴⁾	Non-interest expense divided by the total of net interest income (before provision for loan losses) and non-interest income.

(5)

Adjusted non-interest expense divided by adjusted revenue. Adjusted revenue excludes net gain (loss) on sale of securities and fair value adjustments. Adjusted non-interest expense excludes acquisition related costs, amortization of CDI, net gain (loss) from OREO operations, and WA B&O taxes. These represent non-GAAP financial measures. See the non-GAAP reconciliation tables above under Executive Overview—Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses .

The provision for loan losses reflects the amount required to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level based upon management’s evaluation of the adequacy of general and specific loss reserves, trends in delinquencies and net charge-offs and current economic conditions. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , we recorded a $2.0 million provision for loans losses primarily as a result of new loan originations and the renewal of acquired loans out of the discounted loan portfolios, compared to a $2.0 million loan loss provision recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016 and no loan loss provision recorded in the comparable period a year ago. We continue to maintain an appropriately significant allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2017 , reflecting growth in the related portfolio and current economic conditions.

In accordance with acquisition accounting, loans acquired from acquisitions were recorded at their estimated fair value, which resulted in a net discount to the loans contractual amounts, of which a portion reflects a discount for possible credit losses. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value and as a result no allowance for loan and lease losses is recorded for acquired loans at the acquisition date. Although the discount recorded on the acquired loans is not reflected in the allowance for loan losses, or related allowance coverage ratios, we believe it should be considered when comparing the current ratios to similar ratios in periods prior to the recent acquisitions. The discount on acquired loans was $29.4 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $31.1 million at December 31, 2016 and $42.3 million at March 31, 2016 .

Net charge-offs were $1.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 compared to net recoveries of $189,000 for the same quarter in the prior year. The allowance for loan losses was $86.5 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $86.0 million at December 31, 2016 and $78.2 million at March 31, 2016 . Included in our allowance at March 31, 2017 was an unallocated portion of $6.4 million , which is based upon our evaluation of various factors that are not directly measured in the determination of the formula and specific allowances. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans (loans receivable excluding allowance for loan losses) increased to 1.17% at March 31, 2017 , from 1.15% at December 31, 2016 , and increased from 1.09% at March 31, 2016 .

We believe that the allowance for loan losses as of March 31, 2017 was adequate to absorb the known and inherent risks of loss in the loan portfolio at that date. We believe the estimates and assumptions used in our determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, although there can be no assurance that these estimates and assumptions will not be proven incorrect in the future, or that the actual amount of future provisions will not exceed the amount of past provisions or that any increased provisions that may be required will not adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of the allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators as part of the routine examination process, which may result in the establishment of additional reserves based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Non-interest Income. The following table presents the key components of non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):



	Three months ended March 31,
	2017			2016		Change Amount			Change Percent
Deposit fees and other service charges	$	12,186		$	11,818	$	368		3.1	%
Mortgage banking operations	4,603			5,643		(1,040		)	(18.4	)
Bank owned life insurance	1,095			1,185		(90		)	(7.6	)
Miscellaneous	3,636			1,263		2,373			187.9
	21,520			19,909		1,611			8.1
Net gain (loss) on sale of securities	13			21		(8		)	(38.1	)
Net change in valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value	(688		)	29		(717		)	(2,472.4	)
Total non-interest income	$	20,845		$	19,959	$	886		4.4	%

Non-interest income, which includes changes in the valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value, net gain or loss on sale of securities, and non-interest revenues from core operations, was $20.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $20.0 million for the same quarter in the prior year. Our non-interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 included a $688,000 net loss for fair value adjustments and a $13,000 gain on sale of securities. By contrast, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 , fair value adjustments resulted in a net gain of $29,000 and we had a net gain of $21,000 on sale of securities. For a more detailed discussion of our fair value adjustments, please refer to Note 8 in the Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Excluding the fair value adjustments and net gain on sale of securities, non-interest income from core operations increased by $1.6 million , or 8% , to $21.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $19.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 largely as a result of increased revenues from deposit fees and other service charges and increased miscellaneous income. Deposit fees and other service charges increased by $368,000 , or 3% , for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 compared to the same period a year ago reflecting growth in the number

of deposit accounts resulting in increased transaction activity. Miscellaneous income for the current quarter included a one-time gain of $2.5 million on the sale of a single loan that had been acquired a number of years ago as a partial settlement on a non-performing credit relationship and was carried at a significant discount to its contractual amount and eventual sales price. Mortgage banking revenues, including gains on one- to four-family and multifamily loan sales and loan servicing fees, decreased by $1.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 compared to the same period a year ago. Sales of multifamily loans in the current quarter resulted in gains of $70,000, while sales of multifamily loans generated $725,000 of gains in the same quarter a year ago. The gain on sale of multifamily loans was adversely impacted by higher market rates as that portion of the held-for-sale portfolio had not been hedged. Gains on the sale of one- to four-family loans were also adversely impacted by higher market rates although by a much smaller amount and total originations of one- to four-family loans were only modestly changed from the same quarter a year ago. Home purchase activity accounted for 64% of first quarter one- to four-family mortgage banking loan originations as compared to 61% for the first quarter last year.

Non-interest Expense. The following table represents key elements of non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):



	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			Change Amount			Change Percent
Salaries and employee benefits	$	46,063		$	46,564		$	(501	)	(1.1	)%
Less capitalized loan origination costs	(4,316		)	(4,250		)	(66		)	1.6
Occupancy and equipment	11,996			10,388			1,608			15.5
Information/computer data services	3,994			4,920			(926		)	(18.8	)
Payment and card processing expenses	5,020			4,785			235			4.9
Professional services	5,152			2,614			2,538			97.1
Advertising and marketing	1,328			1,734			(406		)	(23.4	)
Deposit insurance	1,266			1,338			(72		)	(5.4	)
State/Municipal business and use taxes	799			838			(39		)	(4.7	)
REO operations	(966		)	397			(1,363		)	(343.3	)
Amortization of core deposit intangibles	1,624			1,808			(184		)	(10.2	)
Miscellaneous	6,118			6,085			33			0.5
	78,078			77,221			857			1.1
Acquisition related costs	—			6,813			(6,813		)	(100.0	)
Total non-interest expense	$	78,078		$	84,034		$	(5,956	)	(7.1	)%

Non-interest expenses decreased by $6.0 million , to $78.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $84.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 . The decrease was primarily due to $6.8 million of acquisition-related costs in the first quarter of 2016.

Salary and employee benefits expense decreased $501,000 , to $46.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $46.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 . Occupancy and equipment expense increased $1.6 million , to $12.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $10.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 . Information and computer data services decreased $926,000 , for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 . Professional services expense increased $2.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to the same prior-year period, reflecting increased consulting services related to the development and enhancement of Banner Bank's risk management and Dodd Frank Act Stress Testing (DFAST) infrastructure. REO operations net costs were $1.4 million lower for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , compared to the same prior year period, largely due to a $1.2 million gain on the sale of a REO property. Miscellaneous expenses for the current quarter included accruals of $865,000 for customer refunds of certain deposit service fees charged in prior years, which was more than offset by the release of a $1.2 million reserve for possible losses on an unfunded commitment for a single credit relationship that was terminated.

Income Taxes. In the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , we recognized $11.8 million in income tax expense for an effective tax rate of 33.2% , which reflects our normal statutory tax rate reduced by the effect of tax-exempt income, certain tax credits and tax benefits related to restricted stock vesting. The tax benefits related to restricted stock vesting reduced the effective tax rate for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 by 0.6% as a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09. Our normal, expected statutory income tax rate is 37.2%, representing a blend of the statutory federal income tax rate of 35.0% and apportioned effects of the state income tax rates. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016 , we recognized $9.2 million in income tax expense for an effective tax rate of 34.1% . For more discussion on our income taxes, please refer to Note 9 in the Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report on Form 10-Q.

Asset Quality

Achieving and maintaining a moderate risk profile by employing appropriate underwriting standards, avoiding excessive asset concentrations and aggressively managing troubled assets has been and will continue to be a primary focus for us. Our reserve levels are adequate and reflect current market conditions, in addition our impairment analysis and charge-off actions reflect current appraisals and valuation estimates. While our non-performing assets and credit costs have been materially reduced compared to past periods, we continue to be actively engaged with our borrowers in resolving remaining problem assets and with the effective management of real estate owned as a result of foreclosures.

Non-Performing Assets: Non-performing assets decreased to $21.3 million , or 0.21% of total assets, at March 31, 2017 , from $33.8 million , or 0.35% of total assets, at December 31, 2016 , and $23.0 million , or 0.24% of total assets, at March 31, 2016 . Our allowance for loan losses was $86.5 million , or 479% of non-performing loans at March 31, 2017 , compared to $86.0 million , or 381% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2016 and $78.2 million , or 501% of non-performing loans at March 31, 2016 . We believe our level of non-performing loans and assets is manageable and continue to believe that we have sufficient capital and human resources to manage the collection of our non-performing assets in an orderly fashion. The primary components of the $21.3 million in non-performing assets were $17.2 million in nonaccrual loans, $842,000 in loans more than 90 days delinquent and still accruing interest, and $3.2 million in REO and other repossessed assets.

Loans are reported as restructured when we grant concessions to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. As a result of these concessions, restructured loans or TDRs are impaired as the Banks will not collect all amounts due, both principal and interest, in accordance with the terms of the original loan agreement. If any restructured loan becomes delinquent or other matters call into question the borrower's ability to repay full interest and principal in accordance with the restructured terms, the restructured loan(s) would be reclassified as nonaccrual. At March 31, 2017 , we had $17.2 million of restructured loans currently performing under their restructured terms.

Loans acquired in merger transactions with deteriorated credit quality are accounted for as purchased credit-impaired pools. Typically this would include loans that were considered non-performing or restructured as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, subsequent to acquisition, loans included in the purchased credit-impaired pools are not reported as non-performing loans based upon their individual performance status, so the categories of nonaccrual, impaired and 90 day past due and accruing do not include any purchased credit-impaired loans. Purchased credit-impaired loans were $30.5 million at March 31, 2017 , compared to $32.3 million at December 31, 2016 and $53.3 million at March 31, 2016 .

The following table sets forth information with respect to our non-performing assets and restructured loans at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):



	March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016			March 31, 2016
Nonaccrual Loans: ⁽¹⁾
Secured by real estate:
Commercial	$	6,910		$	8,237		$	4,145
Multifamily	147			—			—
Construction and land	1,775			1,748			2,250
One- to four-family	3,386			2,263			4,803
Commercial business	2,700			3,074			1,558
Agricultural business, including secured by farmland	1,012			3,229			663
Consumer	1,285			1,875			906
	17,215			20,426			14,325
Loans more than 90 days delinquent, still on accrual:
Secured by real estate:
Commercial	—			701			—
Multifamily	—			147			—
One- to four-family	545			1,233			1,039
Consumer	297			72			251
	842			2,153			1,290
Total non-performing loans	18,057			22,579			15,615
REO, net ⁽²⁾	3,040			11,081			7,207
Other repossessed assets held for sale	162			166			202
Total non-performing assets	$	21,259		$	33,826		$	23,024

Total non-performing loans to loans before allowance for loan losses	0.24		%	0.30		%	0.22		%
Total non-performing loans to total assets	0.18		%	0.23		%	0.16		%
Total non-performing assets to total assets	0.21		%	0.35		%	0.24		%

Restructured loans ⁽³⁾	$	17,193		$	18,907		$	19,450

Loans 30-89 days past due and on accrual ⁽⁴⁾	$	22,214		$	11,571		$	28,264


⁽¹⁾	Includes $1.0 million of nonaccrual restructured loans at March 31, 2017 . For the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , $187,000 in interest income would have been recorded had nonaccrual loans been current, and no interest income on these loans was included in net income for this period.

⁽²⁾

Real estate acquired by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as REO until it is sold. When property is acquired, it is recorded at the estimated fair value of the property, less expected selling costs, or the carrying value of the defaulted loan. Subsequent to foreclosure, the property is carried at the lower of the foreclosed amount or net realizable value. Upon receipt of a new appraisal and market analysis, the carrying value is written down through the establishment of a specific reserve to the anticipated sales price, less selling and holding costs.


⁽³⁾	These loans were performing under their restructured terms at March 31, 2017 .

⁽⁴⁾ Includes purchased credit-impaired loans.

In addition to the non-performing loans and purchased credit-impaired loans as of March 31, 2017 , we had other classified loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $100.9 million that are not on nonaccrual status, with respect to which known information concerning possible credit problems with the borrowers or the cash flows of the properties securing the respective loans has caused management to be concerned about the ability of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms. This may result in the future inclusion of such loans in the nonaccrual loan category.

REO: REO decreased $8.0 million , to $3.0 million at March 31, 2017 , compared to $11.1 million at December 31, 2016 . The following table shows REO activity for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 :



	Three Months Ended
	Mar 31, 2017			Mar 31, 2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	11,081		$	11,627
Additions from loan foreclosures	—			2
Additions from acquisitions	—			400
Proceeds from dispositions of REO	(9,193		)	(4,666		)
Gain on sale of REO	1,202			49
Valuation adjustments in the period	(50		)	(205		)
Balance, end of period	$	3,040		$	7,207

From time to time, non-recurring fair value adjustments to REO are recorded to reflect partial write-downs based on an observable market price or current appraised value of property. The individual carrying values of these assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually and any additional impairment charges are expensed to operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, proceeds from loan principal and interest payments and sales of loans, and the maturity of and interest income on mortgage-backed and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and mortgage-backed securities are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions, competition and our pricing strategies.

Our primary investing activity is the origination and purchase of loans and, in certain periods, the purchase of securities. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 , our loan originations including loans held for sale exceeded our loan repayments by $48.0 million and $144.9 million , respectively. During those periods we purchased loans and loan participations of $99.2 million and $70.6 million , respectively. This activity was funded primarily by sales of loans and increased deposits in 2017 and primarily from the sale of loans in 2016.

Our primary financing activity is gathering deposits. Increases in most deposit categories contributed to total deposits increasing by $300.5 million during the first three months of 2017 . Certificates of deposit are generally more vulnerable to competition and price sensitive than other retail deposits and our pricing of those deposits varies significantly based upon our liquidity management strategies at any point in time. At March 31, 2017 , certificates of deposit amounted to $1.14 billion , or 14% of our total deposits, including $866.7 million which were scheduled to mature within one year. While no assurance can be given as to future periods, historically, we have been able to retain a significant amount of our deposits as they mature.

FHLB advances (excluding fair value adjustments) decreased $54.0 million from December 31, 2016 , and decreased $75.2 million from March 31, 2016 . Other borrowings increased $14.6 million from December 31, 2016 to $120.2 million at March 31, 2017 and increased $14.1 million from one year ago.

We must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to accommodate deposit withdrawals, to support loan growth, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 , we used our sources of funds primarily to fund loan commitments and purchase securities. At March 31, 2017 , we had outstanding loan commitments totaling $2.42 billion , including undisbursed loans in process and unused credit lines totaling $2.35 billion . While representing potential growth in the loan portfolio and lending activities, this level of commitments is proportionally consistent with our historical experience and does not represent a departure from normal operations.

We generally maintain sufficient cash and readily marketable securities to meet short-term liquidity needs; however, our primary liquidity management practice to supplement deposits is to increase or decrease short-term borrowings, including FHLB advances and Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF) borrowings. We maintain credit facilities with the FHLB-Des Moines, which at March 31, 2017 provided for advances that in the aggregate would equal the lesser of 35% of Banner Bank’s assets or adjusted qualifying collateral (subject to a sufficient level of ownership of FHLB stock), up to a total possible credit line of $3.34 billion , and 35% of Islanders Bank’s assets or adjusted qualifying collateral, up to a total possible credit line of $90.6 million . Advances under these credit facilities (excluding fair value adjustments) totaled $213,000 at March 31, 2017 . In addition, Banner Bank has been approved for participation in the FRBSF’s Borrower-In-Custody (BIC) program. Under this program Banner Bank had available lines of credit of approximately $1.07 billion as of March 31, 2017 , subject to certain collateral requirements, namely the collateral type and risk rating of eligible pledged loans. We had no funds borrowed from the FRBSF at March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016 . Management believes it has adequate resources and funding potential to meet our foreseeable liquidity requirements.

Banner Corporation is a separate legal entity from the Banks and, on a stand-alone level, must provide for its own liquidity and pay its own operating expenses and cash dividends. Banner's primary sources of funds consist of capital raised through dividends or capital distributions from the Banks, although there are regulatory restrictions on the ability of the Banks to pay dividends. At March 31, 2017 , the Company on an unconsolidated basis had liquid assets of $89.3 million .

As noted below, Banner Corporation and its subsidiary banks continued to maintain capital levels significantly in excess of the requirements to be categorized as “Well-Capitalized” under applicable regulatory standards. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 , total shareholders' equity increased $17.7 million , or 1% , to $1.32 billion . Total equity at March 31, 2017 was entirely attributable to voting and non-voting common stock and retained earnings. At March 31, 2017 , tangible common shareholders’ equity, which excludes other goodwill and other intangible assets, was $1.05 billion , or 10.72% of tangible assets. See the discussion and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial information in the Executive Overview section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in this Form 10-Q for more detailed information with respect to tangible common shareholders’ equity. Also, see the capital requirements discussion and table below with respect to our regulatory capital positions.

Capital Requirements

Banner Corporation is a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve. Bank holding companies are subject to capital adequacy requirements of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (BHCA), and the regulations of the Federal Reserve. Banner Bank and Islanders Bank, as state-chartered, federally insured commercial banks, are subject to the capital requirements established by the FDIC.

The capital adequacy requirements are quantitative measures established by regulation that require Banner Corporation and the Banks to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of capital. The Federal Reserve requires Banner Corporation to maintain capital adequacy that generally parallels the FDIC requirements. The FDIC requires the Banks to maintain minimum ratios of Total Capital, Tier 1 Capital, and Common Equity Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets as well as Tier 1 Leverage Capital to average assets. In addition to the minimum capital ratios, the Banks now have to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional Common Equity Tier 1 Capital above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses based on percentages of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions. This new capital conservation buffer requirement began to be phased in starting in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase each year until fully implemented to an amount equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets in January 2019. As of March 31, 2017, the conservation buffer was 1.25%. At March 31, 2017 , Banner Corporation and the Banks each exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. (See Item 1, “Business–Regulation,” and Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2016 Form 10-K for additional information regarding regulatory capital requirements for Banner Corporation and the Banks.)

The actual regulatory capital ratios calculated for Banner Corporation, Banner Bank and Islanders Bank as of March 31, 2017 , along with the minimum capital amounts and ratios, were as follows (dollars in thousands):



	Actual				Minimum to be Categorized as "Adequately Capitalized"				Minimum to be Categorized as “Well-Capitalized”
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Amount
Banner Corporation—consolidated
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	1,227,333	13.85	%	$	708,897	8.00	%	$	886,122	10.00	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	1,138,357		12.85		531,673		6.00		531,673		6.00
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets	1,138,357		11.79		386,229		4.00		n/a		n/a
Common equity tier 1 capital	1,015,251		11.46		398,755		4.50		n/a		n/a
Banner Bank
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	1,053,255		12.15		693,425		8.00		866,781		10.00
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	966,485		11.15		520,068		6.00		693,425		8.00
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets	966,485		10.29		375,777		4.00		469,721		5.00
Common equity tier 1 capital	966,485		11.15		390,051		4.50		563,407		6.50
Islanders Bank
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	35,728		19.02		15,031		8.00		18,788		10.00
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	33,522		17.84		11,273		6.00		15,031		8.00
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets	33,522		13.06		10,271		4.00		12,839		5.00
Common equity tier 1 capital	33,522		17.84		8,455		4.50		12,212		6.50

ITEM 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market Risk and Asset/Liability Management

Our financial condition and operations are influenced significantly by general economic conditions, including the absolute level of interest rates as well as changes in interest rates and the slope of the yield curve. Our profitability is dependent to a large extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest received from our interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred on our interest-bearing liabilities.

Our activities, like all financial institutions, inherently involve the assumption of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will have an adverse impact on the institution’s earnings and underlying economic value. Interest rate risk is determined by the maturity and repricing characteristics of an institution’s assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet contracts. Interest rate risk is measured by the variability of financial performance and economic value resulting from changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk is the primary market risk affecting our financial performance.

The greatest source of interest rate risk to us results from the mismatch of maturities or repricing intervals for rate sensitive assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet contracts. This mismatch or gap is generally characterized by a substantially shorter maturity structure for interest-bearing liabilities than interest-earning assets, although our floating-rate assets tend to be more immediately responsive to changes in market rates than most deposit liabilities. Additional interest rate risk results from mismatched repricing indices and formula (basis risk and yield curve risk), and product caps and floors and early repayment or withdrawal provisions (option risk), which may be contractual or market driven, that are generally more favorable to customers than to us. An exception to this generalization is the beneficial effect of interest rate floors on a substantial portion of our performing floating-rate loans, which help us maintain higher loan yields in periods when market interest rates decline significantly. However, in a declining interest rate environment, as loans with floors are repaid they generally are replaced with new loans which have lower interest rate floors. As of March 31, 2017 , our loans with interest rate floors totaled approximately $2.39 billion and had a weighted average floor rate of 4.65% compared to a current average note rate of 4.92% . An additional source of interest rate risk is a prolonged period of exceptionally low market interest rates. Because interest-bearing deposit costs have been reduced to nominal levels, there is very little possibility that they will be significantly further reduced and our non-interest-bearing deposits are an increasingly significant percentage of total deposits. By contrast, if market rates remain very low, loan and securities yields will likely decline as longer-term instruments mature or are repaid. As a result, a prolonged period of very low interest rates would likely result in compression of our net interest margin. While this pressure on the margin may be mitigated by changes in the mix of assets and deposits, particularly increases in non-interest-bearing deposits, a prolonged period of low interest rates will present a very difficult operating environment for most banks, including us.

The principal objectives of asset/liability management are: to evaluate the interest rate risk exposure; to determine the level of risk appropriate given our operating environment, business plan strategies, performance objectives, capital and liquidity constraints, and asset and liability allocation alternatives; and to manage our interest rate risk consistent with regulatory guidelines and policies approved by the Board of Directors. Through such management, we seek to reduce the vulnerability of our earnings and capital position to changes in the level of interest rates. Our actions in this regard are taken under the guidance of the Asset/Liability Management Committee, which is comprised of members of our senior management. The Committee closely monitors our interest sensitivity exposure, asset and liability allocation decisions, liquidity and capital positions, and local and national economic conditions and attempts to structure the loan and investment portfolios and funding sources to maximize earnings within acceptable risk tolerances.

Sensitivity Analysis

Our primary monitoring tool for assessing interest rate risk is asset/liability simulation modeling, which is designed to capture the dynamics of balance sheet, interest rate and spread movements and to quantify variations in net interest income resulting from those movements under different rate environments. The sensitivity of net interest income to changes in the modeled interest rate environments provides a measurement of interest rate risk. We also utilize economic value analysis, which addresses changes in estimated net economic value of equity arising from changes in the level of interest rates. The net economic value of equity is estimated by separately valuing our assets and liabilities under varying interest rate environments. The extent to which assets gain or lose value in relation to the gains or losses of liability values under the various interest rate assumptions determines the sensitivity of net economic value to changes in interest rates and provides an additional measure of interest rate risk.

The interest rate sensitivity analysis performed by us incorporates beginning-of-the-period rate, balance and maturity data, using various levels of aggregation of that data, as well as certain assumptions concerning the maturity, repricing, amortization and prepayment characteristics of loans and other interest-earning assets and the repricing and withdrawal of deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities into an asset/liability computer simulation model. We update and prepare simulation modeling at least quarterly for review by senior management and the directors. We believe the data and assumptions are realistic representations of our portfolio and possible outcomes under the various interest rate scenarios. Nonetheless, the interest rate sensitivity of our net interest income and net economic value of equity could vary substantially if different assumptions were used or if actual experience differs from the assumptions used.

The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2017 , the estimated changes in our net interest income over one-year and two-year time horizons and the estimated changes in economic value of equity based on the indicated interest rate environments (dollars in thousands):



	Estimated Increase (Decrease) in
Change (in Basis Points) in Interest Rates ⁽¹⁾	Net Interest Income Next 12 Months					Net Interest Income Next 24 Months					Economic Value of Equity
+400	$	17,964		4.7	%	$	57,857		7.5	%	$	(321,964	)	(15.1	)%
+300	14,676			3.8		47,423			6.1		(210,086		)	(9.9	)
+200	10,412			2.7		34,443			4.5		(111,160		)	(5.2	)
+100	5,738			1.5		19,285			2.5		(38,808		)	(1.8	)
0	—			—		—			—		—			—
-25	(4,681		)	(1.2	)	(12,535		)	(1.6	)	3,070			0.1
-50	(11,991		)	(3.1	)	(31,758		)	(4.1	)	2,777			0.1


⁽¹⁾	Assumes an instantaneous and sustained uniform change in market interest rates at all maturities; however, no rates are allowed to go below zero. The current targeted federal funds rate is between 0.75% and 1.00% .

Another (although less reliable) monitoring tool for assessing interest rate risk is gap analysis. The matching of the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which assets and liabilities are interest sensitive and by monitoring an institution’s interest sensitivity gap. An asset or liability is said to be interest sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period. The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets anticipated, based upon certain assumptions, to mature or reprice within a specific time period and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities anticipated to mature or reprice, based upon certain assumptions, within that same time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest-sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest-sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest-sensitive assets. Generally, during a period of rising rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income.

Certain shortcomings are inherent in gap analysis. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table. Finally, the ability of some borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a severe change in market rates.

The following table presents our interest sensitivity gap between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands). The table sets forth the amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities which are anticipated by us, based upon certain assumptions, to reprice or mature in each of the future periods shown. At March 31, 2017 , total interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within one year exceeded total interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing in the same time period by $2.42 billion , representing a one-year cumulative gap to total assets ratio of 24.07% . Management is aware of the sources of interest rate risk and in its opinion actively monitors and manages it to the extent possible. The interest rate risk indicators and interest sensitivity gaps as of March 31, 2017 are within our internal policy guidelines and management considers that our current level of interest rate risk is reasonable.



	Within 6 Months			After 6 Months Within 1 Year			After 1 Year Within 3 Years			After 3 Years Within 5 Years			After 5 Years Within 10 Years			Over 10 Years			Total
Interest-earning assets: ⁽¹⁾
Construction loans	$	538,931		$	64,925		$	61,503		$	2,141		$	109		$	—		$	667,609
Fixed-rate mortgage loans	297,290			193,656			500,878			293,517			183,539			1,601			1,470,481
Adjustable-rate mortgage loans	988,967			407,279			1,095,526			636,215			197,997			73			3,326,057
Fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities	77,347			72,297			237,860			198,693			327,237			93,913			1,007,347
Adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities	72,339			530			2,192			8,003			2,919			—			85,983
Fixed-rate commercial/agricultural loans	109,377			94,165			189,008			59,352			16,183			1,799			469,884
Adjustable-rate commercial/agricultural loans	843,174			26,187			63,835			29,553			8,455			—			971,204
Consumer and other loans	435,716			18,916			90,212			18,642			14,817			29,361			607,664
Investment securities and interest-earning deposits	152,238			5,791			111,119			72,651			95,583			55,624			493,006
Total rate sensitive assets	3,515,379			883,746			2,352,133			1,318,767			846,839			182,371			9,099,235
Interest-bearing liabilities: ⁽²⁾
Regular savings	208,593			107,430			343,999			241,866			348,517			341,618			1,592,023
Interest checking accounts	143,143			59,592			194,065			138,964			200,068			192,399			928,231
Money market deposit accounts	199,517			129,859			403,849			268,204			341,011			201,504			1,543,944
Certificates of deposit	569,716			297,014			223,615			51,126			2,953			—			1,144,424
FHLB advances	5			5			23			26			81			71			211
Other borrowings	—			5,000			—			—			—			—			5,000
Junior subordinated debentures	140,212			—			—			—			—			—			140,212
Retail repurchase agreements	115,245			—			—			—			—			—			115,245
Total rate sensitive liabilities	1,376,431			598,900			1,165,551			700,186			892,630			735,592			5,469,290
Excess (deficiency) of interest-sensitive assets over interest-sensitive liabilities	$	2,138,948		$	284,846		$	1,186,582		$	618,581		$	(45,791	)	$	(553,221	)	$	3,629,945
Cumulative excess (deficiency) of interest-sensitive assets	$	2,138,948		$	2,423,794		$	3,610,376		$	4,228,957		$	4,183,166		$	3,629,945		$	3,629,945
Cumulative ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities	255.40		%	222.70		%	214.95		%	210.10		%	188.37		%	166.37		%	166.37		%
Interest sensitivity gap to total assets	21.24		%	2.83		%	11.79		%	6.14		%	(0.45		)%	(5.49		)%	36.05		%
Ratio of cumulative gap to total assets	21.24		%	24.07		%	35.86		%	42.00		%	41.55		%	36.05		%	36.05		%

(Footnotes on following page)

Footnotes for Table of Interest Sensitivity Gap

⁽¹⁾

Adjustable-rate assets are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period in which they are due to mature, and fixed-rate assets are included in the period in which they are scheduled to be repaid based upon scheduled amortization, in each case adjusted to take into account estimated prepayments. Mortgage loans and other loans are not reduced for allowances for loan losses and non-performing loans. Mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, other loans and investment securities are not adjusted for deferred fees, unamortized acquisition premiums and discounts.

⁽²⁾

Adjustable-rate liabilities are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period they are due to mature. Although regular savings, demand, interest checking, and money market deposit accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal, based on historical experience management considers a substantial amount of such accounts to be core deposits having significantly longer maturities. For the purpose of the gap analysis, these accounts have been assigned decay rates to reflect their longer effective maturities. If all of these accounts had been assumed to be short-term, the one-year cumulative gap of interest-sensitive assets would have been $(792.3) million , or (7.87)% of total assets at March 31, 2017 . Interest-bearing liabilities for this table exclude certain non-interest-bearing deposits which are included in the average balance calculations in the table contained in Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 ” of this report on Form 10-Q .

ITEM 4 – Controls and Procedures

The management of Banner Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives are met. Also, because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. As a result of these inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of our senior management as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2017 , our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to our management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.


(b)	Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting: In the quarter ended March 31, 2017 , there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, we have various legal proceedings and other contingent matters outstanding. These proceedings and the associated legal claims are often contested and the outcome of individual matters is not always predictable. These claims and counter claims typically arise during the course of collection efforts on problem loans or with respect to actions to enforce liens on properties in which we hold a security interest, although we also periodically are subject to claims related to employment matters. We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings that management believes would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operations.

ITEM 1A – Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (File No. 0-26584).

ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Not applicable.

(b) Not applicable.

(c) The following table provides information about repurchases of common stock by the Company during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 :



Period	Total Number of Common Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Common Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan	Maximum Number of Remaining Shares that May be Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Authorization
January 1, 2017 - January 31, 2017	183	$	55.67	—	566,290
February 1, 2017 - February 28, 2017	1,652	58.57		—	566,290
March 1, 2017 - March 31, 2017	12,919	54.32		—	1,658,245
Total for quarter	14,754	54.81		—	1,658,245

The 14,754 shares were surrendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock grants.

On March 31, 2017, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had renewed its authorization to repurchase up to 5% of the Company's common stock, or 1,658,245 of the Company's outstanding shares. Under the plan, shares may be repurchased by the Company in open market purchases. The extent to which the Company repurchases its shares and the timing of such repurchases will depend upon market conditions and other corporate considerations.

ITEM 3 – Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5 – Other Information

Not Applicable.

ITEM 6 – Exhibits



Exhibit	Index of Exhibits

2.1{a}	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 5, 2014, by and among the Registrant, SKBHC Holdings LLC and Starbuck Bancshares, Inc. [incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 12, 2014 (File No. 000-26584)].

2.1{b}	Amendment, dated as of May 18, 2015, to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 5, 2014, by and among the Registrant, SKBHC Holdings LLC and Starbuck Bancshares, Inc. [incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2015 (File No. 000-26584)].

2.1{c}	Amendment No. 2, dated July 13, 2015, to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 5, 2014, by and among SKBHC Holdings LLC, Starbuck Bancshares, Inc., Banner Corporation, and Elements Merger Sub, LLC.

2.1{d}	Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of August 7, 2014 by and between Banner Corporation and Siuslaw Financial Group, Inc. [incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2014 (File No. 000-26584)].

3{a}	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant [incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2010 (File No. 000-26584)], as amended on May 26, 2011 [incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2011 (File No. 000-26584)].

3{b}	Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant for non-voting common stock [incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2015 (File No. 000-26584)]

3{c}	Bylaws of Registrant [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2011 (File No. 000-26584)].

4{a}	Warrant to purchase shares of the Registrant's common stock dated November 21, 2008 [incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2008 (File No. 000-26584)]

10{a}	Executive Salary Continuation Agreement with Gary L. Sirmon [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1996 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{b}	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, with Mark J. Grescovich [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2013 (File No. 000-26584].

10{c}	Supplemental Executive Retirement Program Agreement with D. Michael Jones [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{d}	Form of Supplemental Executive Retirement Program Agreement with Gary Sirmon, Michael K. Larsen, Lloyd W. Baker, Cynthia D. Purcell and Richard B. Barton [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and the exhibits filed with the Form 8-K on May 6, 2008 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{e}	2001 Stock Option Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated August 8, 2001 (File No. 333-67168)].

10{f}	Form of Employment Contract entered into with Lloyd W. Baker, Cynthia D. Purcell, Richard B. Barton and Douglas M. Bennett [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Form 8-K on June 25, 2014 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{g}	2004 Executive Officer and Director Stock Account Deferred Compensation Plan [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{h}	2004 Executive Officer and Director Investment Account Deferred Compensation Plan [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{i}	Long-Term Incentive Plan and Form of Repricing Agreement [incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Form 8-K on May 6, 2008 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{j}	2005 Executive Officer and Director Stock Account Deferred Compensation Plan [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{k}	Entry into an Indemnification Agreement with each of the Registrant's Directors [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Form 8-K on January 29, 2010 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{l}	2012 Restricted Stock and Incentive Bonus Plan [incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 19, 2013 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{m}	Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2013 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{n}	Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2013 (File No. 000-26584)].



10{o}	2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan [incorporated by reference as Appendix C to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 24, 2014 (File No. 000-26584)] and amendments [incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2015 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{p}	Forms of Equity-Based Award Agreements: Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement, Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement, Restricted Stock Award Agreement, Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, Stock Appreciation Right Award Agreement, and Performance Unit Award Agreement [incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.2 - 10.7 included in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated May 9, 2014 (File No. 333-195835)].

10{q}	Employment agreement entered into with Johan Mehlum [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated October 8, 2014 (File No. 333-199211)].

10{r}	Investor Letter Agreement dated as of November 5, 2014 by and between Banner Corporation, and Oaktree Principal Fund V (Delaware), L.P. and certain of its affiliates (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 12, 2014 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{s}	Investor Letter Agreement dated as of November 5, 2014 by and between Banner Corporation, and Friedman Fleischer and Lowe Capital Partners III, L.P. and certain of its affiliates (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 12, 2014 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{t}	Investor Letter Agreement dated as of November 5, 2014 by and between Banner Corporation, and GS Capital Partners VI Fund L.P. and certain of its affiliates (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 12, 2014 (File No. 000-26584)] and amendment [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2015 (File No. 000-26584)].

10{u}	Amendment to Investor Letter Agreement dated as of May 18, 2015 by and between Banner Corporation, and GS Capital partners VI Fund, L.P. and certain of its affiliates (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2015 (File No. 000-26584)).

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32	Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101	The following materials from Banner Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (a) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (b) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (c) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (d) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity; (e) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (f) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	Banner Corporation

May 5, 2017	/s/ Mark J. Grescovich
	Mark J. Grescovich
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

May 5, 2017	/s/ Lloyd W. Baker
	Lloyd W. Baker
	Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 1: Basis Of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies Note 2: Accounting Standards Recently Issued Or Adopted Note 3: Securities Note 4: Loans Receivable and The Allowance For Loan Losses Note 5: Real Estate Owned, Net Note 6: Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights Note 7: Deposits Note 8: Fair Value Of Financial Instruments Note 9: Income Taxes and Deferred Taxes Note 10: Calculation Of Weighted Average Shares Outstanding For Earnings Per Share (eps)Note 11: Stock-based Compensation Plans Note 12: Commitments and Contingencies Note 13: Derivatives and Hedging Item 2 Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 4 Controls and Procedures Part II Other Information Item 1 Legal Proceedings Item 1A Risk Factors Item 2 Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures Item 5 Other Information Item 6 Exhibits

BANR 10-Q Quarter ended March 31, 2017