BPOP 10-Q Quarterly Report June 30, 2014 | Alphaminr

BPOP 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2014

POPULAR INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 d771074d10q.htm 10-Q 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

Commission File Number: 001-34084

POPULAR, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Puerto Rico 66-0667416

(State or other jurisdiction of

Incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer

Identification Number)

Popular Center Building

209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue

Hato Rey, Puerto Rico

00918
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(787) 765-9800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NOT APPLICABLE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 103,481,803 shares outstanding as of August 4, 2014.


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

INDEX

Page
Part I – Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

5

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

6

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the quarters and six months ended June  30, 2014 and 2013

7

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June  30, 2014 and 2013

8

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

9

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

10

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

147

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

221

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

222

Part II – Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

222

Item 1A. Risk Factors

222

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

224

Item 6. Exhibits

225

Signatures

226

2


Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Information

The information included in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may relate to Popular, Inc.’s (the “Corporation”, “Popular”, “we, “us”, “our”) financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, delinquency trends, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting standards on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continues,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “project” and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “can,” “may,” or similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict.

Various factors, some of which are beyond Popular’s control, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:

the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and economic conditions;

changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes;

the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies;

changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels of capital and the impact of proposed capital standards on our capital ratios;

the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) on our businesses, business practices and cost of operations;

regulatory approvals that may be necessary to undertake certain actions or consummate strategic transactions such as acquisitions and dispositions;

the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are located;

the performance of the stock and bond markets;

competition in the financial services industry;

additional Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assessments;

the resolution of our dispute with the FDIC under our loss share agreement entered into in connection with the Westernbank-FDIC assisted transaction; and

possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes.

Other possible events or factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements include the following: negative economic conditions that adversely affect the general economy, housing prices, the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provision expense; changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect our ability to originate and distribute financial products in the primary and secondary markets; adverse movements and volatility in debt and equity capital markets; changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value of financial assets and liabilities; liabilities resulting from litigation and regulatory investigations; changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations; increased competition; our ability to grow our core businesses; decisions to downsize, sell or close units or otherwise change our business mix; and management’s ability to identify and manage these and other risks. Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in “Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings,” is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of regulators, judges and juries. Investors should refer to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as well as “Part II, Item 1A” of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.

3


Table of Contents

All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information available to the Corporation as of the date of this document, and other than as required by law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

4


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(UNAUDITED)

June 30, December 31,

(In thousands, except share information)

2014 2013

Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 362,572 $ 423,211

Money market investments:

Federal funds sold

5,055

Securities purchased under agreements to resell

192,490 175,965

Time deposits with other banks

1,474,454 677,433

Total money market investments

1,666,944 858,453

Trading account securities, at fair value:

Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge

255,990 308,978

Other trading securities

89,833 30,765

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value:

Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge

1,483,479 1,286,839

Other investment securities available-for-sale

4,170,513 4,007,961

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value 2014 - $103,501; 2013 - $120,688)

114,280 140,496

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable value 2014 - $170,700; 2013 - $184,526)

168,125 181,752

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

97,010 110,426

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

19,726,234 21,704,010

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

2,736,102 2,984,427

Less – Unearned income

91,010 92,144

Allowance for loan losses

624,911 640,555

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

21,746,415 23,955,738

FDIC loss share asset

751,553 948,608

Premises and equipment, net

492,382 519,516

Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

139,420 135,501

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

155,805 168,007

Accrued income receivable

119,520 131,536

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

151,951 161,099

Other assets

2,292,360 1,687,558

Goodwill

461,246 647,757

Other intangible assets

40,122 45,132

Assets from discontinued operations (Refer to Note 3)

1,828,382

Total assets

$ 36,587,902 $ 35,749,333

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Non-interest bearing

$ 5,666,685 $ 5,922,682

Interest bearing

19,234,467 20,788,463

Total deposits

24,901,152 26,711,145

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

2,074,676 1,659,292

Other short-term borrowings

31,200 401,200

Notes payable

2,360,089 1,584,754

Other liabilities

880,602 766,792

Liabilities from discontinued operations (Refer to Note 3)

2,079,742

Total liabilities

32,327,461 31,123,183

Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 24)

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391 shares issued and outstanding

50,160 50,160

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 170,000,000 shares authorized; 103,539,383 shares issued (2013 – 103,435,967) and 103,472,979 shares outstanding (2013 – 103,397,699)

1,035 1,034

Surplus

4,173,616 4,170,152

Retained earnings

167,663 594,430

Treasury stock – at cost, 66,404 shares (2013 – 38,268)

(1,742 ) (881 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

(130,291 ) (188,745 )

Total stockholders’ equity

4,260,441 4,626,150

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 36,587,902 $ 35,749,333

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands, except per share information)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Interest income:

Loans

$ 380,986 $ 370,298 $ 758,588 $ 730,814

Money market investments

1,131 829 2,104 1,784

Investment securities

33,989 36,106 69,116 73,929

Trading account securities

5,344 5,456 10,601 10,970

Total interest income

421,450 412,689 840,409 817,497

Interest expense:

Deposits

26,223 32,445 53,081 67,061

Short-term borrowings

8,892 9,767 17,932 19,548

Long-term debt

445,716 36,066 477,606 71,833

Total interest expense

480,831 78,278 548,619 158,442

Net interest (expense) income

(59,381 ) 334,411 291,790 659,055

Provision for loan losses—non-covered loans

50,074 228,975 104,196 438,068

Provision for loan losses—covered loans

11,604 25,500 37,318 43,056

Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses

(121,059 ) 79,936 150,276 177,931

Service charges on deposit accounts

39,237 41,378 78,596 82,539

Other service fees (Refer to Note 30)

56,468 57,279 109,286 112,223

Mortgage banking activities (Refer to Note 12)

3,788 18,081 7,466 38,378

Net gain and valuation adjustments on investment securities

5,856 5,856

Trading account profit (loss)

1,055 (4,345 ) 3,032 (5,329 )

Net gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

9,659 4,291 14,052 (58,428 )

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

(7,454 ) (11,632 ) (17,801 ) (27,775 )

FDIC loss share expense (Refer to Note 31)

(55,261 ) (3,755 ) (79,467 ) (30,021 )

Other operating income

15,297 181,565 43,657 201,585

Total non-interest income

62,789 288,718 158,821 319,028

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

99,100 106,359 203,401 213,940

Net occupancy expenses

20,267 21,059 41,627 41,551

Equipment expenses

12,044 11,485 23,456 23,105

Other taxes

13,543 15,225 27,206 26,753

Professional fees

67,024 67,015 134,023 134,752

Communications

6,425 6,395 13,110 12,946

Business promotion

16,038 15,357 27,424 27,942

FDIC deposit insurance

10,480 18,557 21,458 26,913

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

3,410 7,657 9,850 53,524

Other operating expenses

20,509 22,766 42,858 43,684

Amortization of intangibles

2,025 1,989 4,051 3,979

Restructuring costs (Refer to Note 4)

4,574 4,574

Total operating expenses

275,439 293,864 553,038 609,089

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax

(333,709 ) 74,790 (243,941 ) (112,130 )

Income tax (benefit) expense

(4,124 ) (237,380 ) 19,140 (294,257 )

(Loss) income from continuing operations

(329,585 ) 312,170 (263,081 ) 182,127

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax (Refer to Note 3)

(181,729 ) 15,298 (161,824 ) 25,034

Net (Loss) Income

$ (511,314 ) $ 327,468 $ (424,905 ) $ 207,161

Net (Loss) Income Applicable to Common Stock

$ (512,245 ) $ 326,537 $ (426,767 ) $ 205,300

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share – Basic

Net (loss) income from continuing operations

$ (3.21 ) 3.03 (2.58 ) 1.76

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

(1.77 ) 0.15 (1.57 ) 0.24

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share – Basic

$ (4.98 ) $ 3.18 $ (4.15 ) $ 2.00

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share – Diluted

Net (loss) income from continuing operations

$ (3.21 ) 3.02 (2.58 ) 1.75

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

(1.77 ) 0.15 (1.57 ) 0.24

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share – Diluted

$ (4.98 ) $ 3.17 $ (4.15 ) $ 1.99

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

Quarters ended, Six months ended,
June 30, June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Net (loss) income

$ (511,314 ) $ 327,468 $ (424,905 ) $ 207,161

Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax:

Foreign currency translation adjustment

(603 ) (2,653 ) (2,718 ) (1,929 )

Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income

7,718

Amortization of net losses of pension and postretirement benefit plans

2,126 6,169 4,252 12,338

Amortization of prior service cost of pension and postretirement benefit plans

(950 ) (1,900 )

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments arising during the period

27,084 (115,514 ) 54,666 (144,469 )

Unrealized net (losses) gains on cash flow hedges

(2,548 ) 5,882 (4,273 ) 5,782

Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income

1,800 (3,045 ) 3,624 (3,196 )

Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax

26,909 (109,161 ) 61,369 (131,474 )

Income tax (expense) benefit

(925 ) 5,130 (2,915 ) 8,303

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

25,984 (104,031 ) 58,454 (123,171 )

Comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

$ (485,330 ) $ 223,437 $ (366,451 ) $ 83,990

Tax effect allocated to each component of other comprehensive loss:

Quarters ended Six months ended,
June 30, June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Amortization of net losses of pension and postretirement benefit plans

$ (829 ) $ (2,962 ) $ (1,658 ) $ (4,813 )

Amortization of prior service cost of pension and postretirement benefit plans

370 741

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments arising during the period

(758 ) 8,942 (2,251 ) 13,891

Unrealized net (losses) gains on cash flow hedges

994 (1,764 ) 1,666 (1,734 )

Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income

(702 ) 914 (1,413 ) 959

Income tax (expense) benefit

$ (925 ) $ 5,130 $ (2,915 ) $ 8,303

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

Common
stock
Preferred
stock
Surplus Retained
earnings
Treasury
stock
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Total

Balance at December 31, 2012

$ 1,032 $ 50,160 $ 4,150,294 $ 11,826 $ (444 ) $ (102,868 ) $ 4,110,000

Net income

207,161 207,161

Issuance of stock

1 3,231 3,232

Dividends declared:

Preferred stock

(1,861 ) (1,861 )

Common stock purchases

(325 ) (325 )

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

(123,171 ) (123,171 )

Balance at June 30, 2013

$ 1,033 $ 50,160 $ 4,153,525 $ 217,126 $ (769 ) $ (226,039 ) $ 4,195,036

Balance at December 31, 2013

$ 1,034 $ 50,160 $ 4,170,152 $ 594,430 $ (881 ) $ (188,745 ) $ 4,626,150

Net loss

(424,905 ) (424,905 )

Issuance of stock

1 3,047 3,048

Tax windfall benefit on vesting of restricted stock

417 417

Dividends declared:

Preferred stock

(1,862 ) (1,862 )

Common stock purchases

(872 ) (872 )

Common stock reissuance

11 11

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

58,454 58,454

Balance at June 30, 2014

$ 1,035 $ 50,160 $ 4,173,616 $ 167,663 $ (1,742 ) $ (130,291 ) $ 4,260,441

Disclosure of changes in number of shares:

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Preferred Stock:

Balance at beginning and end of period

2,006,391 2,006,391

Common Stock – Issued:

Balance at beginning of period

103,435,967 103,193,303

Issuance of stock

103,416 117,849

Balance at end of the period

103,539,383 103,311,152

Treasury stock

(66,404 ) (35,021 )

Common Stock – Outstanding

103,472,979 103,276,131

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

8


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net (loss) income

$ (424,905 ) $ 207,161

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

Provision for loan losses

134,750 473,264

Goodwill impairment losses

186,511

Amortization of intangibles

5,007 4,935

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

23,832 25,009

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

324,779 (29,525 )

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

15,836 10,741

FDIC loss share expense

79,467 30,021

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

17,801 27,775

Earnings from investments under the equity method

(24,355 ) (34,214 )

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

2,689 (321,854 )

Loss (gain) on:

Disposition of premises and equipment

(2,551 ) (2,347 )

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale and mortgage banking activities

(42,413 ) 44,577

Sale of stock in equity method investee

(136,722 )

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

(2,035 ) 35,006

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

(159,727 ) (15,335 )

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

72,757 119,003

Net originations on loans held-for-sale

(338,672 ) (867,917 )

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

459,792 858,092

Accrued income receivable

6,721 (18,177 )

Other assets

(48,455 ) 2,103

Net increase (decrease) in:

Interest payable

633 (2,570 )

Pension and other postretirement benefit obligation

(3,096 ) 3,786

Other liabilities

30,260 4,055

Total adjustments

739,531 209,706

Net cash provided by operating activities

314,626 416,867

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net (increase) decrease in money market investments

(808,491 ) 13,641

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

(1,079,586 ) (1,490,647 )

Other

(51,097 ) (116,731 )

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

816,830 1,378,311

Held-to-maturity

27,029 2,359

Other

64,724 83,592

Net repayments on loans

473,336 624,262

Proceeds from sale of loans

87,983 295,237

Acquisition of loan portfolios

(289,292 ) (1,520,088 )

Net payments from (to) FDIC under loss sharing agreements

110,618 (107 )

Return of capital from equity method investments

438

Proceeds from sale of stock in equity method investee

166,332

Mortgage servicing rights purchased

(45 )

Acquisition of premises and equipment

(20,333 ) (19,774 )

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment

8,631 5,891

Foreclosed assets

81,010 120,365

Net cash used in investing activities

(578,638 ) (456,964 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

252,715 (259,950 )

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

418,381 (344,047 )

Other short-term borrowings

(370,000 ) 590,000

Payments of notes payable

(111,030 ) (48,458 )

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

31,905 49,874

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

3,048 3,232

Dividends paid

(1,862 ) (1,551 )

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

(861 ) (325 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

222,296 (11,225 )

Net decrease in cash and due from banks

(41,716 ) (51,322 )

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

423,211 439,363

Cash and due from banks at end of period, including discontinued operations

381,495 388,041

Less: cash from discontinued operations

18,923

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 362,572 $ 388,041

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

9


Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 -

Organization, consolidation and basis of presentation 11

Note 2 -

New accounting pronouncements

12

Note 3 -

Discontinued operations

15

Note 4 -

Restructuring plan

17

Note 5 -

Restrictions on cash and due from banks and certain securities

18

Note 6 -

Pledged assets

19

Note 7 -

Investment securities available-for-sale

20

Note 8 -

Investment securities held-to-maturity

24

Note 9 -

Loans

26

Note 10 -

Allowance for loan losses

37

Note 11 -

FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation

62

Note 12 -

Mortgage banking activities

64

Note 13 -

Transfers of financial assets and mortgage servicing assets

65

Note 14 -

Other real estate owned

69

Note 15 -

Other assets

70

Note 16 -

Goodwill and other intangible assets

71

Note 17 -

Deposits

74

Note 18 -

Borrowings

75

Note 19 -

Offsetting of financial assets and liabilities

78

Note 20 -

Trust preferred securities

80

Note 21 -

Stockholders’ equity

82

Note 22 -

Other comprehensive loss

83

Note 23 -

Guarantees

85

Note 24 -

Commitments and contingencies

88

Note 25 -

Non-consolidated variable interest entities

92

Note 26 -

Related party transactions with affiliated company / joint venture

96

Note 27 -

Fair value measurement

100

Note 28 -

Fair value of financial instruments

106

Note 29 -

Net (loss) income per common share

112

Note 30 -

Other service fees

113

Note 31 -

FDIC loss share (expense) income

114

Note 32 -

Pension and postretirement benefits

115

Note 33 -

Stock-based compensation

116

Note 34 -

Income taxes

119

Note 35 -

Supplemental disclosure on the consolidated statements of cash flows

123

Note 36 -

Segment reporting

124

Note 37 -

Subsequent events

130

Note 38 -

Condensed consolidating financial information of guarantor and issuers of registered guaranteed securities

131

10


Table of Contents

Note 1 – Organization, consolidation and basis of presentation

Nature of Operations

Popular, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States and the Caribbean. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail, including mortgage loan originations, and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as investment banking, broker-dealer, auto and equipment leasing and financing, and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. The Corporation’s mortgage origination business is conducted under the brand name Popular Mortgage, a division of BPPR. In the U.S. mainland, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA focuses efforts and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA operates branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. The BPNA branches operate under the name of Popular Community Bank. Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporation’s business segments. Note 37 presents information regarding definitive agreements entered into by BPNA sell its regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. The consolidated statement of financial condition data at December 31, 2013 was derived from audited financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements are, in the opinion of management, a fair statement of the results for the periods reported and include all necessary adjustments, all of a normal recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2013 consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial statements to conform with the 2014 presentation. As discussed in Note 3, current and prior periods presented in the consolidated statement of operations as well as the related note disclosures covering income and expense amounts have been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The consolidated statement of financial condition and related note disclosure for prior periods do not reflect the reclassification of BPNA’s assets and liabilities to discontinued operations.

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted from the unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2013, included in the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Report (the “2013 Annual Report”). Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

11


Table of Contents

Note 2 – New accounting pronouncements

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-12 in June 2014, which intends to resolve the diverse accounting treatment of awards with a performance target that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period. That is, the employee would be eligible to vest in the award regardless of whether the employee is rendering service on the date the performance target is achieved.

The amendments of the ASU require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award.

Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period.

The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments of this ASU can be applied (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets outstanding at the beginning of the period of adoption and to all new or modified awards thereafter.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures (“ASU 2014-11”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-11 in June 2014, which requires two accounting changes. First, the amendments in this Update change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting. Second, for repurchase financing arrangements, the amendments require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement.

The amendments in this Update require disclosures for certain transactions comprising (1) a transfer of a financial asset accounted for as a sale and (2) an agreement with the same transferee entered into in contemplation of the initial transfer that results in the transferor retaining substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial asset throughout the term of the transaction.

The accounting changes in this ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2015. Early application is prohibited. An entity is required to present changes in accounting for transactions outstanding on the effective date as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606); (“ASU 2014-09”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 in May 2014, which clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develop a common revenue standard that would (1) remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements, (2) provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, (3) improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets, (4) provide more useful information to users of financial statement through improved disclosure requirements and (5) simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. ASU 2014-09 amends the ASC Codification and creates a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

In addition, the new guidance requires disclosures to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about contract with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the cost to obtain or fulfill a contract.

The amendments in this ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2017. Early adoption is not permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposal of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-08 in April 2014, which changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity investment.

In addition, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will include more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations.

The new guidance also requires disclosure of the pre-tax income attributable to a disposal of a significant part of an organization that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. This disclosure will provide information about the ongoing trends in the reporting organization’s results from continuing operations.

The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2015. Early adoption is permitted.

12


Table of Contents

The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on the presentation and disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-04, Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors (SubTopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (“ASU 2014-04”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-04 in January 2014 which clarifies when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of a residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized.

The amendments of this ASU clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either: a) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure; or b) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement.

The amendment of this guidance requires interim and annual disclosures of both the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction.

ASU 2014-04 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. The amendments in this ASU can be elected using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. Early adoption is permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (“ASU 2013-11”)

The FASB issued ASU 2013-11 in July 2013 which requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. When a net operating loss, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position, or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purposes, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date. Currently, there is no explicit guidance under U.S. GAAP on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The amendment of this guidance does not require new recurring disclosures.

ASU 2013-11 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.

The Corporation adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2014 and it did not have a material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment Upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (“ASU 2013-05”)

The FASB issued ASU 2013-05 in March 2013 which clarifies the applicable guidance for the release of the cumulative translation adjustment. When a reporting entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity, the parent is required to apply the guidance in ASC subtopic 830-30 to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets has resided.

13


Table of Contents

For an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, the partial sale guidance in ASC Section 830-30-40 still applies. As such, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income upon a partial sale of such equity method investment. However, this treatment does not apply to an equity method investment that is not a foreign entity. In those instances, the cumulative translation adjustment is released into net income only if the partial sale represents a complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity that contains the equity method investment.

Additionally, the amendments in this ASU clarify that the sale of an investment in a foreign entity includes both: (1) events that result in the loss of a controlling financial interest in a foreign entity and (2) events that result in an acquirer obtaining control of an acquiree in which it held an equity interest immediately before the acquisition date. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income upon the occurrence of those events.

ASU 2013-05 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2013. The amendments should be applied prospectively to derecognition events occurring after the effective date. Prior periods should not be adjusted.

The Corporation adopted this guidance on the first quarter of 2014 and recognized a loss of approximately $7.7 million resulting from the reclassification from other comprehensive loss into earnings of the cumulative foreign translation adjustment related to the dilution on its equity investment in BHD. Refer to note 15 for additional information.

14


Table of Contents

Note 3 – Discontinued operations

On April 22, 2014, BPNA, the Corporation’s U.S. mainland banking subsidiary, entered into definitive agreements to sell California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations to three different buyers. BPNA completed the sale of its Illinois regional operations on August 8, 2014. The remaining transactions are expected to be completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2014. In connection with these transactions, the Corporation intends to centralize certain back office operations in Puerto Rico and New York. The operations subject to these three definitive agreements each constituted a business, as defined in ASC 805-10-55. Accordingly, the decision to sell these businesses resulted in the discontinuance of each of these respective operations and classification as held-for-sale. For financial reporting purposes, the results of the discontinued operations are presented as “Assets / Liabilities from discontinued operations” in the consolidated statement of condition and “(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax” in the consolidated statement of operations. As required by ASC 205-20, current and prior periods presented in the consolidated statement of operations as well as the related note disclosures covering income and expense amounts have been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The consolidated statement of financial condition and related note disclosure for prior periods do not reflect the reclassification of these assets and liabilities to discontinued operations.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $187 million, related to the goodwill allocated, on a relative fair value basis, to these operations. However, this non-cash charge had no impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios. Refer to Note 16, for additional information on the goodwill impairment charge. The Corporation expects to realize a net premium estimated at approximately $24 million, before customary transaction costs, upon the closing of these transactions.

The Corporation estimates that it will incur in restructuring charges of approximately $54 million, comprised of $32 million in severance, retention and employee related costs and $22 million in operational set-up costs and lease cancelations, of which approximately $5 million where incurred during the second quarter of 2014. Refer to Note 4, for restructuring charges incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2014.

Assets and liabilities of discontinued operations, which are mostly classified as held-for-sale, are detailed below:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014

Cash

$ 18,923

Loans held-for-sale

1,783,998

Premises and equipment, net

17,553

Other assets

7,908

Total assets

$ 1,828,382

Deposits

$ 2,058,309

Short-term borrowings

2,998

Other liabilities

18,435

Total liabilities

$ 2,079,742

Net liabilities

$ (251,360 )

15


Table of Contents

The following table provides the components of net (loss) income from the discontinued operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Quarter ended Six months ended

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Net interest income

$ 19,092 $ 21,308 $ 40,889 $ 42,977

Provision (reversal) for loan losses

(5,067 ) (6,764 ) (7,860 )

Non-interest income

9,388 4,645 19,921 8,392

Personnel costs

12,117 8,320 20,969 16,728

Net occupancy expenses

2,845 3,049 7,176 6,030

Professional fees

5,903 2,949 8,696 5,709

Goodwill impairment charge

186,511 186,511

Other operating expenses

2,833 1,404 6,046 5,728

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

$ (181,729 ) $ 15,298 $ (161,824 ) $ 25,034

16


Table of Contents

Note 4 – Restructuring plan

As discussed in Note 3, in connection with the sale of the operations of the California, Illinois and Central Florida regions, the Corporation intends to centralize certain back office operations, previously conducted on these regions, in Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation has undertaken a restructuring plan (the “PCB Restructuring Plan”) to eliminate and re-locate employment positions, terminate contracts and incur other costs associated with moving the operations to Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation estimates that it will incur in restructuring charges of approximately $54 million, comprised of $32 million in severance and retention payments and $22 million in operational set-up costs and lease cancelations, of which approximately $5 million where incurred during the second quarter of 2014. The remaining costs will be recognized during the third and fourth quarter of 2014 and early 2015.

Full-time equivalent employees at the California, Illinois and Central Florida regions were 363 as of June 30, 2014, compared with 365 as of December 31, 2013. Some of the employees at these regions will be transferred to the acquiring entities. The remaining employees at these regions are expected to be transferred to other of the Corporation’s U.S. mainland or Puerto Rico operations or depart by mid- 2015.

The following table details the expenses recorded by the Corporation that were associated with the PCB restructuring plan:

(In thousands)

Quarter ended June 30, 2014

Personnel costs

$ 3,630

Net occupancy expenses

271

Equipment expenses

190

Professional fees

448

Other operating expenses

35

Total restructuring costs

$ 4,574

At June 30, 2014, the accrual for the PCB restructuring costs amounted to $3 million.

17


Table of Contents

Note 5 – Restrictions on cash and due from banks and certain securities

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries, BPPR and BPNA, are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Fed”) or other banks. Those required average reserve balances amounted to $ 1.0 billion at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $992 million). Cash and due from banks, as well as other short-term, highly liquid securities, are used to cover the required average reserve balances.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation held $43 million in restricted assets in the form of funds deposited in money market accounts, trading account securities and investment securities available for sale (December 31, 2013 - $44 million). The amounts held in trading account securities and investment securities available for sale consist primarily of restricted assets held for the Corporation’s non-qualified retirement plans and fund deposits guaranteeing possible liens or encumbrances over the title of insured properties.

18


Table of Contents

Note 6 – Pledged assets

Certain securities and loans were pledged to secure public and trust deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit facilities available, derivative positions, and loan servicing agreements. The classification and carrying amount of the Corporation’s pledged assets, in which the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, were as follows:

June 30, December 31,

(In thousands)

2014 2013

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

$ 2,264,948 $ 1,638,558

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost

10,000 35,000

Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value

216 363

Loans held-in-portfolio covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

365,432 407,257

Loans held-in-portfolio not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

8,447,919 9,108,984

Total pledged assets

$ 11,088,515 $ 11,190,162

Pledged assets from discontinued operations are presented as part of “Assets from Discontinued Operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Condition. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the discontinued operations.

Pledged securities that the creditor has the right by custom or contract to repledge are presented separately on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation had $ 1.2 billion in investment securities available-for-sale and $ 0.6 billion in loans that served as collateral to secure public funds (December 31, 2013 - $ 1.0 billion and $ 0.5 billion, respectively).

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term credit facilities authorized with the Federal Home Loan Bank system (the “FHLB”) aggregating to $3.3 billion (December 31, 2013 - $3.0 billion). Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. At June 30, 2014, the credit facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $ 3.4 billion in loans held-in-portfolio (December 31, 2013 - $ 4.5 billion). Also, at June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) discount window of $2.6 billion, which remained unused as of such date ( December 31, 2013 - $3.4 billion). The amount available under these credit facilities with the Fed is dependent upon the balance of loans and securities pledged as collateral. At June 30, 2014, the credit facilities with the Fed discount window were collateralized by $ 4.8 billion in loans held-in-portfolio (December 31, 2013 - $ 4.5 billion). These pledged assets are included in the above table and were not reclassified and separately reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

In addition, at June 30, 2014, trade receivables from brokers and counterparties amounting to $76 million were pledged to secure repurchase agreements (December 31, 2013 - $69 million).

19


Table of Contents

Note 7 – Investment securities available-for-sale

The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Weighted
average
yield

U.S. Treasury securities

After 1 to 5 years

$ 26,085 $ 1,644 $ $ 27,729 3.87 %

Total U.S. Treasury securities

26,085 1,644 27,729 3.87

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

Within 1 year

6,998 7 7,005 0.14

After 1 to 5 years

1,948,833 2,424 9,053 1,942,204 1.20

After 5 to 10 years

252,520 581 7,198 245,903 1.63

After 10 years

23,000 882 22,118 3.15

Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

2,231,351 3,012 17,133 2,217,230 1.27

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

After 1 to 5 years

5,384 19 22 5,381 2.86

After 5 to 10 years

23,352 7 1,398 21,961 5.46

After 10 years

48,812 422 7,405 41,829 5.85

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

77,548 448 8,825 69,171 5.52

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

After 1 to 5 years

4,876 124 5,000 2.56

After 5 to 10 years

27,924 1,219 2 29,141 2.82

After 10 years

2,305,054 17,819 53,542 2,269,331 2.06

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

2,337,854 19,162 53,544 2,303,472 2.07

Collateralized mortgage obligations—private label

After 10 years

130 130 3.90

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—private label

130 130 3.90

Mortgage-backed securities

Within 1 year

1 1 3.66

After 1 to 5 years

26,420 1,458 27,878 4.56

After 5 to 10 years

200,182 8,743 486 208,439 3.47

After 10 years

735,125 50,779 2,174 783,730 4.08

Total mortgage-backed securities

961,728 60,980 2,660 1,020,048 3.97

Equity securities (without contractual maturity)

3,177 1,284 118 4,343 6.39

Other

After 1 to 5 years

9,458 15 9,443 1.68

After 10 years

2,341 85 2,426 3.63

Total other

11,799 85 15 11,869 2.06

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 5,649,672 $ 86,615 $ 82,295 $ 5,653,992 2.14 %

20


Table of Contents
At December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Weighted
average
yield

U.S. Treasury securities

After 1 to 5 years

$ 26,474 $ 2,008 $ $ 28,482 3.85 %

Total U.S. Treasury securities

26,474 2,008 28,482 3.85

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

Within 1 year

25,021 39 25,060 1.85

After 1 to 5 years

1,087,453 1,678 12,715 1,076,416 1.26

After 5 to 10 years

528,611 100 21,742 506,969 1.52

After 10 years

23,000 2,240 20,760 3.12

Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

1,664,085 1,817 36,697 1,629,205 1.38

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

After 1 to 5 years

6,228 45 85 6,188 4.64

After 5 to 10 years

23,147 1,978 21,169 6.33

After 10 years

48,803 29 9,812 39,020 5.84

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

78,178 74 11,875 66,377 5.89

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

After 1 to 5 years

5,131 101 5,232 1.79

After 5 to 10 years

31,613 921 32,534 2.98

After 10 years

2,438,021 18,532 76,023 2,380,530 2.05

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

2,474,765 19,554 76,023 2,418,296 2.06

Collateralized mortgage obligations—private label

After 10 years

509 4 513 3.78

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—private label

509 4 513 3.78

Mortgage-backed securities

Within 1 year

419 24 443 3.14

After 1 to 5 years

15,921 833 16,754 4.50

After 5 to 10 years

62,373 3,058 1,214 64,217 4.12

After 10 years

1,007,733 50,807 4,313 1,054,227 3.93

Total mortgage-backed securities

1,086,446 54,722 5,527 1,135,641 3.95

Equity securities (without contractual maturity)

3,178 1,109 171 4,116 4.06

Other

After 1 to 5 years

9,638 141 9,497 1.68

After 10 years

2,604 69 2,673 3.61

Total other

12,242 69 141 12,170 2.09

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 5,345,877 $ 79,357 $ 130,434 $ 5,294,800 2.30 %

The weighted average yield on investment securities available-for-sale is based on amortized cost; therefore, it does not give effect to changes in fair value.

Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.

There were no sales of investment securities available-for-sale during the six months ended June 30, 2014 or June 30, 2013.

21


Table of Contents

The following tables present the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total

(In thousands)

Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

$ 594,695 $ 8,886 $ 462,222 $ 8,247 $ 1,056,917 $ 17,133

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

20,733 2,584 24,596 6,241 45,329 8,825

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

713,604 24,114 758,570 29,430 1,472,174 53,544

Mortgage-backed securities

15,875 446 46,384 2,214 62,259 2,660

Equity securities

1,707 118 1,707 118

Other

9,443 15 9,443 15

Total investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position

$ 1,344,907 $ 36,030 $ 1,302,922 $ 46,265 $ 2,647,829 $ 82,295

At December 31, 2013
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total

(In thousands)

Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

$ 1,326,866 $ 32,457 $ 69,257 $ 4,240 $ 1,396,123 $ 36,697

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

54,256 11,685 8,330 190 62,586 11,875

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

1,567,654 70,378 96,676 5,645 1,664,330 76,023

Mortgage-backed securities

105,455 4,762 7,225 765 112,680 5,527

Equity securities

1,657 171 1,657 171

Other

9,497 141 9,497 141

Total investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position

$ 3,055,888 $ 119,453 $ 190,985 $ 10,981 $ 3,246,873 $ 130,434

As of June 30, 2014, the available-for-sale investment portfolio reflects gross unrealized losses of approximately $82 million, driven by US Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, obligations from the U.S. Government sponsored entities, and obligations of the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions. As part of its analysis for all US Agencies’ securities, management considers the US Agency guarantee.

In February 2014, the three principal nationally recognized rating agencies (Moody’s Investor Services, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings) downgraded the general-obligation bonds of the Commonwealth and other obligations of Puerto Rico instrumentalities to non-investment grade categories, citing concerns about financial flexibility and a reduced capacity to borrow in the financial markets. On June 2014, the Puerto Rico general obligations were further downgraded by the rating agencies, after the Commonwealth enacted a law that allowed the Puerto Rico public corporations to restructure their debt. The portfolio of obligations of the Puerto Rico Government is comprised of securities with specific sources of income or revenues identified for repayments. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers.

22


Table of Contents

Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (“OTTI”) declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired, the excess of the security’s carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a geographic area, and (7) management’s intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the debt security before a forecasted recovery occurs.

At June 30, 2014, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation did not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell the investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.

The following table states the name of issuers, and the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), in which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders’ equity. This information excludes securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Investments in obligations issued by a state of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies, which are payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S. Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Amortized cost Fair value Amortized cost Fair value

FNMA

$ 2,013,092 $ 1,988,874 $ 2,318,171 $ 2,266,610

FHLB

1,144,118 1,139,269 336,933 326,220

Freddie Mac

1,361,507 1,356,819 1,434,346 1,418,216

23


Table of Contents

Note 8 – Investment securities held-to-maturity

The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Weighted
average
yield

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

Within 1 year

$ 12,685 $ $ 2 $ 12,683 2.10 %

After 1 to 5 years

12,595 1 383 12,213 5.93

After 5 to 10 years

20,925 5,209 15,716 6.08

After 10 years

66,471 1,368 6,545 61,294 2.28

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

112,676 1,369 12,139 101,906 3.37

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

After 5 to 10 years

104 8 96 5.45

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

104 8 96 5.45

Other

Within 1 year

1,250 1,250 1.39

After 1 to 5 years

250 1 249 1.38

Total other

1,500 1 1,499 1.39

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 114,280 $ 1,369 $ 12,148 $ 103,501 3.35 %

At December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Weighted
average
yield

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

Within 1 year

$ 12,570 $ $ 12 $ 12,558 2.06 %

After 1 to 5 years

12,060 984 11,076 5.91

After 5 to 10 years

20,015 5,251 14,764 6.06

After 10 years

69,236 257 13,179 56,314 2.43

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

113,881 257 19,426 94,712 3.40

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

After 10 years

115 7 122 5.45

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

115 7 122 5.45

Other

Within 1 year

26,000 645 25,355 3.41

After 1 to 5 years

500 1 499 1.33

Total other

26,500 646 25,854 3.37

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 140,496 $ 264 $ 20,072 $ 120,688 3.40 %

Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.

24


Table of Contents

The following tables present the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total

(In thousands)

Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ 48,601 $ 5,012 $ 22,948 $ 7,127 $ 71,549 $ 12,139

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

96 8 96 8

Other

249 1 249 1

Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized loss position

$ 48,946 $ 5,021 $ 22,948 $ 7,127 $ 71,894 $ 12,148

At December 31, 2013
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total

(In thousands)

Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ 60,028 $ 12,180 $ 13,044 $ 7,246 $ 73,072 $ 19,426

Other

24,604 646 24,604 646

Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized loss position

$ 84,632 $ 12,826 $ 13,044 $ 7,246 $ 97,676 $ 20,072

As indicated in Note 7 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates investment securities for OTTI declines in fair value on a quarterly basis.

The “Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions” classified as held-to-maturity at June 30, 2014 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of Puerto Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. This includes $62 million of securities issued by three municipalities of Puerto Rico that are payable from the real and personal property taxes collected within such municipalities. These bonds have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality. The portfolio also includes approximately $41 million in securities for which the underlying source of payment is not the central government, but in which it provides a guarantee in the event of default. In February 2014, the three principal nationally recognized rating agencies (Moody’s Investor Services, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings) downgraded the general-obligation bonds of the Commonwealth and other obligations of Puerto Rico instrumentalities to non-investment grade categories, citing concerns about financial flexibility and a reduced capacity to borrow in the financial markets. On June 2014, the Puerto Rico general obligations were further downgraded by the rating agencies, after the Commonwealth enacted a law that allowed the Puerto Rico public corporations to restructure their debt. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. The Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities held-to-maturity and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell these investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.

25


Table of Contents

Note 9 – Loans

Covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for lines of credit with revolving privileges, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. The Corporation measures additional losses for this portfolio when it is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all cash flows expected at acquisition plus additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after acquisition. Lines of credit with revolving privileges that were acquired as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction are accounted for under the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the Corporation’s initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income. Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed in non-accrual status when past due in accordance with the Corporation’s non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued.

The risks on loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction are significantly different from the risks on loans not covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC. Accordingly, the Corporation presents loans subject to the loss sharing agreements as “covered loans” in the information below and loans that are not subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements as “non-covered loans”. The FDIC loss sharing agreements expires at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2015 for commercial (including construction) and consumer loans, and at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2020 for to single-family residential mortgage loans, as explained in Note 11.

For a summary of the accounting policy related to loans, interest recognition and allowance for loan losses refer to the summary of significant accounting policies included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in 2013 Annual Report.

The following table presents the composition of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio (“HIP”), net of unearned income, at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Commercial multi-family

$ 475,826 $ 1,175,937

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2,501,036 2,970,505

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1,758,535 2,166,545

Commercial and industrial

3,420,150 3,724,197

Construction

179,059 206,084

Mortgage

6,664,448 6,681,476

Leasing

546,868 543,761

Legacy [2]

162,941 211,135

Consumer:

Credit cards

1,171,182 1,185,272

Home equity lines of credit

388,667 478,211

Personal

1,406,920 1,349,119

Auto

745,579 699,980

Other

214,013 219,644

Total loans held-in-portfolio [1]

$ 19,635,224 $ 21,611,866

[1] Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio at June 30, 2014 are net of $91 million in unearned income and exclude $97 million in loans held-for-sale (December 31, 2013 - $92 million in unearned income and $110 million in loans held-for-sale).
[2] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

26


Table of Contents

The following table presents the composition of covered loans at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Commercial real estate

$ 1,638,634 $ 1,710,229

Commercial and industrial

107,333 102,575

Construction

82,763 190,127

Mortgage

867,075 934,373

Consumer

40,297 47,123

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 2,736,102 $ 2,984,427

The following table provides a breakdown of loans held-for-sale (“LHFS”) at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 by main categories.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 [1] December 31, 2013

Commercial

$ 2,895 $ 603

Construction

949

Mortgage

93,166 109,823

Total loans held-for-sale

$ 97,010 $ 110,426

[1] Loans held-for-sale from discontinued operations are presented as part of “Assets from Discontinued Operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Condition. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the discontinued operations.

During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded purchases (including repurchases) of mortgage loans amounting to $169 million and $331 million, respectively (June 30, 2013 - $0.4 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively). Also, the Corporation recorded purchases of $92 million in consumer loans during the six months ended June 30, 2014 (June 30, 2013 - $42 million). In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded purchases of commercial loans amounting to $21 million (during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 - $3 million).

The Corporation performed whole-loan sales involving approximately $27 million and $70 million of residential mortgage loans during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively (June 30, 2013 - $503 million and $553 million, respectively). These sales included $435 million from the bulk sale of non-performing mortgage loans, completed during the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Also, the Corporation securitized approximately $ 184 million and $ 350 million of mortgage loans into Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage-backed securities during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively (June 30, 2013 - $ 282 million and $ 568 million, respectively). Furthermore, the Corporation securitized approximately $ 60 million and $ 123 million of mortgage loans into Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) mortgage-backed securities during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively (June 30, 2013 - $ 124 million and $ 252 million, respectively). Also, the Corporation did not securitize mortgage loans into Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) mortgage-backed securities during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 (during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 - $ 27 million). The Corporation sold commercial and construction loans with a book value of approximately $30 million and $61 million during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively (June 30, 2013 - $6 million and $407 million, respectively). These sales included $401 million from the bulk sale of non-performing commercial and construction loans during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

27


Table of Contents

Non-covered loans

The following tables present non-covered loans held-in-portfolio by loan class that are in non-performing status or are accruing interest but are past due 90 days or more at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more consist primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA and other insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans which are included in the Corporation’s financial statements pursuant to GNMA’s buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the option (but not the obligation) to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Also, accruing loans past due 90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from another financial institution that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment from the seller / servicer, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under recourse agreements. However, residential conventional loans purchased from another financial institution, which are in the process of foreclosure, are classified as non-performing mortgage loans.

At June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico U.S. mainland [4] Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Non-accrual
loans
Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
Non-accrual
loans
Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
Non-accrual
loans
Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more

Commercial multi-family

$ 2,851 $ $ 4,105 $ $ 6,956 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

56,406 11,857 68,263

Commercial real estate owner occupied

108,286 4,199 112,485

Commercial and industrial

86,009 417 4,420 90,429 417

Construction

21,456 21,456

Mortgage [2][3]

262,356 399,300 23,964 286,320 399,300

Leasing

2,873 2,873

Legacy

8,323 8,323

Consumer:

Credit cards

19,595 378 378 19,595

Home equity lines of credit

467 7,221 7,221 467

Personal

17,968 1,459 19,427

Auto

11,703 11,703

Other

3,898 454 3 3,901 454

Total [1]

$ 573,806 $ 420,233 $ 65,929 $ $ 639,735 $ 420,233

[1] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $ 4 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.
[2] Non-covered loans by $55 million accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analysis.
[3] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $124 million of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of June 30, 2014. Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $60 million in reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets.
[4] Excludes $9.5 million in non-performing loans from discontinued operations.

28


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2013

Puerto Rico U.S. mainland Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Non-accrual
loans
Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
Non-accrual
loans
Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
Non-accrual
loans
Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more

Commercial multi-family

$ 4,944 $ $ 20,894 $ $ 25,838 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

41,959 42,413 84,372

Commercial real estate owner occupied

83,441 23,507 106,948

Commercial and industrial

55,753 556 6,142 61,895 556

Construction

18,108 5,663 23,771

Mortgage [2][3]

206,389 395,645 26,292 232,681 395,645

Leasing

3,495 3,495

Legacy

15,050 15,050

Consumer:

Credit cards

20,313 486 486 20,313

Home equity lines of credit

147 8,632 8,632 147

Personal

17,054 54 1,591 18,645 54

Auto

10,562 2 10,564

Other

5,550 585 21 5,571 585

Total [1]

$ 447,255 $ 417,300 $ 150,693 $ $ 597,948 $ 417,300

[1] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $ 1 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.
[2] Non-covered loans by $43 million accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analysis.
[3] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $115 million of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of December 31, 2013. Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $50 million in reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets.

The following tables present loans by past due status at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 for non-covered loans held-in-portfolio (net of unearned income).

June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico

Past due Non-covered
30-59 60-89 90 days Total loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current Puerto Rico

Commercial multi-family

$ $ 189 $ 2,851 $ 3,040 $ 58,466 $ 61,506

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2,836 2,453 56,406 61,695 1,888,187 1,949,882

Commercial real estate owner occupied

9,351 4,015 108,286 121,652 1,423,932 1,545,584

Commercial and industrial

18,564 3,905 86,426 108,895 2,633,113 2,742,008

Construction

583 21,456 22,039 113,644 135,683

Mortgage

293,037 157,245 716,632 1,166,914 4,291,658 5,458,572

Leasing

7,083 1,857 2,873 11,813 535,055 546,868

Consumer:

Credit cards

12,977 8,533 19,595 41,105 1,114,780 1,155,885

Home equity lines of credit

467 467 13,814 14,281

Personal

14,465 7,132 17,968 39,565 1,247,340 1,286,905

Auto

35,057 8,837 11,703 55,597 689,712 745,309

Other

1,462 522 4,352 6,336 207,133 213,469

Total

$ 394,832 $ 195,271 $ 1,049,015 $ 1,639,118 $ 14,216,834 $ 15,855,952

29


Table of Contents

June 30, 2014

U.S. mainland

Past due
30-59 60-89 90 days Total Loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current U.S. mainland

Commercial multi-family

$ $ $ 4,105 $ 4,105 $ 410,215 $ 414,320

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

11,857 11,857 539,297 551,154

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1,553 8,500 4,199 14,252 198,699 212,951

Commercial and industrial

2,411 4,022 4,420 10,853 667,289 678,142

Construction

43,376 43,376

Mortgage

1,892 7,241 23,964 33,097 1,172,779 1,205,876

Legacy

1,871 2,770 8,323 12,964 149,977 162,941

Consumer:

Credit cards

295 176 378 849 14,448 15,297

Home equity lines of credit

2,052 2,077 7,221 11,350 363,036 374,386

Personal

790 1,034 1,459 3,283 116,732 120,015

Auto

6 6 264 270

Other

20 3 23 521 544

Total

$ 10,890 $ 25,820 $ 65,929 $ 102,639 $ 3,676,633 $ 3,779,272

June 30, 2014

Popular, Inc.

Past due Non-covered
30-59 60-89 90 days Total loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current Popular, Inc.

Commercial multi-family

$ $ 189 $ 6,956 $ 7,145 $ 468,681 $ 475,826

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2,836 2,453 68,263 73,552 2,427,484 2,501,036

Commercial real estate owner occupied

10,904 12,515 112,485 135,904 1,622,631 1,758,535

Commercial and industrial

20,975 7,927 90,846 119,748 3,300,402 3,420,150

Construction

583 21,456 22,039 157,020 179,059

Mortgage

294,929 164,486 740,596 1,200,011 5,464,437 6,664,448

Leasing

7,083 1,857 2,873 11,813 535,055 546,868

Legacy

1,871 2,770 8,323 12,964 149,977 162,941

Consumer:

Credit cards

13,272 8,709 19,973 41,954 1,129,228 1,171,182

Home equity lines of credit

2,052 2,077 7,688 11,817 376,850 388,667

Personal

15,255 8,166 19,427 42,848 1,364,072 1,406,920

Auto

35,063 8,837 11,703 55,603 689,976 745,579

Other

1,482 522 4,355 6,359 207,654 214,013

Total

$ 405,722 $ 221,091 $ 1,114,944 $ 1,741,757 $ 17,893,467 $ 19,635,224

30


Table of Contents

December 31, 2013

Puerto Rico

Past due Non-covered
30-59 60-89 90 days Total loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current Puerto Rico

Commercial multi-family

$ 446 $ $ 4,944 $ 5,390 $ 77,013 $ 82,403

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

13,889 349 41,959 56,197 1,808,021 1,864,218

Commercial real estate owner occupied

13,725 8,318 83,441 105,484 1,501,019 1,606,503

Commercial and industrial

9,960 4,463 56,309 70,732 2,841,734 2,912,466

Construction

2,329 18,108 20,437 140,734 161,171

Mortgage

316,663 154,882 645,444 1,116,989 4,283,690 5,400,679

Leasing

7,457 1,607 3,495 12,559 531,202 543,761

Consumer:

Credit cards

13,797 9,991 20,313 44,101 1,125,520 1,169,621

Home equity lines of credit

133 53 147 333 14,845 15,178

Personal

12,897 6,794 17,108 36,799 1,177,085 1,213,884

Auto

31,340 9,361 10,562 51,263 648,228 699,491

Other

1,834 859 6,135 8,828 209,636 218,464

Total

$ 424,470 $ 196,677 $ 907,965 $ 1,529,112 $ 14,358,727 $ 15,887,839

December 31, 2013

U.S. mainland

Past due
30-59 60-89 90 days Total Loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current U.S. mainland

Commercial multi-family

$ 3,621 $ 1,675 $ 20,894 $ 26,190 $ 1,067,344 $ 1,093,534

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

4,255 42,413 46,668 1,059,619 1,106,287

Commercial real estate owner occupied

657 8,452 23,507 32,616 527,426 560,042

Commercial and industrial

2,331 2,019 6,142 10,492 801,239 811,731

Construction

5,663 5,663 39,250 44,913

Mortgage

30,713 9,630 26,292 66,635 1,214,162 1,280,797

Legacy

9,079 2,098 15,050 26,227 184,908 211,135

Consumer:

Credit cards

285 200 486 971 14,680 15,651

Home equity lines of credit

2,794 2,198 8,632 13,624 449,409 463,033

Personal

3,196 826 1,591 5,613 129,622 135,235

Auto

11 2 13 476 489

Other

43 50 21 114 1,066 1,180

Total

$ 56,985 $ 27,148 $ 150,693 $ 234,826 $ 5,489,201 $ 5,724,027

31


Table of Contents

December 31, 2013

Popular, Inc.

Past due Non-covered
30-59 60-89 90 days Total loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current Popular, Inc.

Commercial multi-family

$ 4,067 $ 1,675 $ 25,838 $ 31,580 $ 1,144,357 $ 1,175,937

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

18,144 349 84,372 102,865 2,867,640 2,970,505

Commercial real estate owner occupied

14,382 16,770 106,948 138,100 2,028,445 2,166,545

Commercial and industrial

12,291 6,482 62,451 81,224 3,642,973 3,724,197

Construction

2,329 23,771 26,100 179,984 206,084

Mortgage

347,376 164,512 671,736 1,183,624 5,497,852 6,681,476

Leasing

7,457 1,607 3,495 12,559 531,202 543,761

Legacy

9,079 2,098 15,050 26,227 184,908 211,135

Consumer:

Credit cards

14,082 10,191 20,799 45,072 1,140,200 1,185,272

Home equity lines of credit

2,927 2,251 8,779 13,957 464,254 478,211

Personal

16,093 7,620 18,699 42,412 1,306,707 1,349,119

Auto

31,351 9,361 10,564 51,276 648,704 699,980

Other

1,877 909 6,156 8,942 210,702 219,644

Total

$ 481,455 $ 223,825 $ 1,058,658 $ 1,763,938 $ 19,847,928 $ 21,611,866

The following table provides a breakdown of loans held-for-sale (“LHFS”) in non-performing status at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 by main categories.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Commercial

$ 2,895 $ 603

Construction

949

Mortgage

582 489

Total

$ 4,426 $ 1,092

The outstanding principal balance of non-covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, net of amounts charged off by the Corporation, amounted to $226 million at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013—$197 million). At June 30, 2014, none of the acquired non-covered loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans.

Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the non-covered loans accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

Activity in the accretable discount - Non-covered loans ASC 310-30

For the quarter ended For the quarter ended

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Beginning balance

$ 67,285 $ 36,627

Additions

4,060 10,107

Accretion

(2,552 ) (2,004 )

Change in expected cash flows

8,034 4,483

Ending balance

$ 76,827 $ 49,213

32


Table of Contents

Activity in the accretable discount—Non-covered loans ASC 310-30

For the six months ended For the six months ended

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Beginning balance

$ 49,398 $

Additions

11,144 47,342

Accretion

(4,926 ) (2,612 )

Change in expected cash flows

21,211 4,483

Ending balance

$ 76,827 $ 49,213

Carrying amount of non-covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30

For the quarter ended For the quarter ended

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Beginning balance

$ 190,216 133,041

Additions

13,139 22,899

Accretion

2,552 2,004

Collections and charge-offs

(6,866 ) (19,312 )

Ending balance

$ 199,041 $ 138,632

Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 non-covered loans

(15,751 )

Ending balance, net of ALLL

$ 183,290 $ 138,632

Carrying amount of non-covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30

For the six months ended For the six months ended

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Beginning balance

$ 173,659 $

Additions

33,181 156,311

Accretion

4,926 2,612

Collections and charge-offs

(12,725 ) (20,291 )

Ending balance

$ 199,041 $ 138,632

Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 non-covered loans

(15,751 )

Ending balance, net of ALLL

$ 183,290 $ 138,632

Covered loans

The following table presents covered loans in non-performing status and accruing loans past-due 90 days or more by loan class at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
Non-accrual Accruing loans past Non-accrual Accruing loans past

(In thousands)

loans due 90 days or more loans due 90 days or more

Commercial real estate

$ 7,775 $ $ 8,345 $

Commercial and industrial

888 7,335 456

Construction

4,112 11,872

Mortgage

3,044 18 1,739 69

Consumer

331 90 112

Total [1]

$ 16,150 $ 18 $ 29,381 $ 637

[1] Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses.

33


Table of Contents

The following tables present loans by past due status at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 for covered loans held-in-portfolio. The information considers covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and ASC Subtopic 310-30.

June 30, 2014

Past due
30-59 60-89 90 days Total Covered

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current loans HIP

Commercial real estate

$ 18,747 $ 7,829 $ 340,117 $ 366,693 $ 1,271,941 $ 1,638,634

Commercial and industrial

870 684 7,686 9,240 98,093 107,333

Construction

71,197 71,197 11,566 82,763

Mortgage

46,826 25,447 149,311 221,584 645,491 867,075

Consumer

2,139 830 3,762 6,731 33,566 40,297

Total covered loans

$ 68,582 $ 34,790 $ 572,073 $ 675,445 $ 2,060,657 $ 2,736,102

December 31, 2013

Past due
30-59 60-89 90 days Total Covered

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current loans HIP

Commercial real estate

$ 42,898 $ 8,745 $ 374,301 $ 425,944 $ 1,284,285 $ 1,710,229

Commercial and industrial

1,584 349 16,318 18,251 84,324 102,575

Construction

399 178,007 178,406 11,721 190,127

Mortgage

50,222 23,384 165,030 238,636 695,737 934,373

Consumer

2,588 1,328 4,200 8,116 39,007 47,123

Total covered loans

$ 97,691 $ 33,806 $ 737,856 $ 869,353 $ 2,115,074 $ 2,984,427

The carrying amount of the covered loans consisted of loans determined to be impaired at the time of acquisition, which are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30 (“credit impaired loans”), and loans that were considered to be performing at the acquisition date, accounted for by analogy to ASC Subtopic 310-30 (“non-credit impaired loans”), as detailed in the following table.

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
Carrying amount Carrying amount

(In thousands)

Non-credit
impaired loans
Credit impaired
loans
Total Non-credit
impaired loans
Credit impaired
loans
Total

Commercial real estate

$ 1,450,099 $ 126,474 $ 1,576,573 $ 1,483,331 $ 149,341 $ 1,632,672

Commercial and industrial

65,372 4,496 69,868 55,192 3,069 58,261

Construction

37,925 40,283 78,208 71,864 104,356 176,220

Mortgage

804,169 49,481 853,650 862,878 59,483 922,361

Consumer

30,346 2,019 32,365 35,810 2,623 38,433

Carrying amount

2,387,911 222,753 2,610,664 2,509,075 318,872 2,827,947

Allowance for loan losses

(50,609 ) (40,283 ) (90,892 ) (57,594 ) (36,321 ) (93,915 )

Carrying amount, net of allowance

$ 2,337,302 $ 182,470 $ 2,519,772 $ 2,451,481 $ 282,551 $ 2,734,032

The outstanding principal balance of covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, net of amounts charged off by the Corporation, amounted to $3.4 billion at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013—$3.8 billion). At June 30, 2014, none of the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans.

34


Table of Contents

Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the covered loans accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, were as follows:

Activity in the accretable yield
Covered loans ASC 310-30
For the quarters ended
June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013
Non-credit Credit Non-credit Credit

(In thousands)

impaired loans impaired loans Total impaired loans impaired loans Total

Beginning balance

$ 1,212,706 $ 5,506 $ 1,218,212 $ 1,372,375 $ (240 ) $ 1,372,135

Accretion

(77,316 ) (2,547 ) (79,863 ) (60,284 ) (2,252 ) (62,536 )

Change in expected cash flows

135,812 6,597 142,409 53,579 16,434 70,013

Ending balance

$ 1,271,202 $ 9,556 $ 1,280,758 $ 1,365,670 $ 13,942 $ 1,379,612

Activity in the accretable discount
Covered loans ASC 310-30
For the six months ended
June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013
Non-credit Credit Non-credit Credit
impaired impaired impaired impaired

(In thousands)

loans loans Total loans loans Total

Beginning balance

$ 1,297,725 $ 11,480 $ 1,309,205 $ 1,446,381 $ 5,288 $ 1,451,669

Accretion

(149,868 ) (9,113 ) (158,981 ) (121,461 ) (6,065 ) (127,526 )

Change in expected cash flows

123,345 7,189 130,534 40,750 14,719 55,469

Ending balance

$ 1,271,202 $ 9,556 $ 1,280,758 $ 1,365,670 $ 13,942 $ 1,379,612

Carrying amount of covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30
For the quarters ended
June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013
Non-credit Credit Non-credit Credit

(In thousands)

impaired loans impaired loans Total impaired loans impaired loans Total

Beginning balance

$ 2,469,453 $ 263,669 $ 2,733,122 $ 2,758,944 $ 398,719 $ 3,157,663

Accretion

77,316 2,547 79,863 60,284 2,252 62,536

Collections and charge-offs

(158,858 ) (43,463 ) (202,321 ) (166,157 ) (41,176 ) (207,333 )

Ending balance

$ 2,387,911 $ 222,753 $ 2,610,664 $ 2,653,071 $ 359,795 $ 3,012,866

Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 covered loans

(50,609 ) (40,283 ) (90,892 ) (47,017 ) (44,178 ) (91,195 )

Ending balance, net of ALLL

$ 2,337,302 $ 182,470 $ 2,519,772 $ 2,606,054 $ 315,617 $ 2,921,671

35


Table of Contents
Carrying amount of loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30
For the six months ended
June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013
Non-credit Credit Non-credit Credit

(In thousands)

impaired loans impaired loans Total impaired loans impaired loans Total

Beginning balance

$ 2,509,075 $ 318,872 $ 2,827,947 $ 3,051,964 $ 439,795 $ 3,491,759

Accretion

149,868 9,113 158,981 121,461 6,065 127,526

Collections and charge offs

(271,032 ) (105,232 ) (376,264 ) (520,354 ) (86,065 ) (606,419 )

Ending balance

$ 2,387,911 $ 222,753 $ 2,610,664 $ 2,653,071 $ 359,795 $ 3,012,866

Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 covered loans

(50,609 ) (40,283 ) (90,892 ) (47,017 ) (44,178 ) (91,195 )

Ending balance, net of ALLL

$ 2,337,302 $ 182,470 $ 2,519,772 $ 2,606,054 $ 315,617 $ 2,921,671

The Corporation accounts for lines of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loans payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income over the life of the loans, if the loan is accruing interest. Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 amounted to $0.1 billion at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013—$0.2 billion).

36


Table of Contents

Note 10 – Allowance for loan losses

The Corporation follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology includes the consideration of factors such as current economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss experience and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on this methodology. Loan losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35. Also, the Corporation determines the allowance for loan losses on purchased impaired loans and purchased loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by analogy, by evaluating decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date.

The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous loans. The determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses includes the following principal factors:

Base net loss rates, which are based on the moving average of annualized net loss rates computed over a 3-year historical loss period for the commercial and construction loan portfolios, and an 18-month period for the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios. The base net loss rates are applied by loan type and by legal entity.

Recent loss trend adjustment, which replaces the base loss rate with a 12-month average loss rate, when these trends are higher than the respective base loss rates. The objective of this adjustment is to allow for a more recent loss trend to be captured and reflected in the ALLL estimation process. As part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models, as discussed in the following paragraphs and implemented as of June 30 th 2014, the Corporation eliminated the use of caps in the recent loss trend adjustment for the consumer and mortgage portfolios, among other revisions. For the period ended December 31, 2013, the recent loss trend adjustment caps for the consumer and mortgage portfolios were triggered in only one portfolio segment within the Puerto Rico consumer portfolio. Management assessed the impact of the applicable cap through a review of qualitative factors that specifically considered the drivers of recent loss trends and changes to the portfolio composition. The related effect of the aforementioned cap was immaterial for the overall level of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses for the Puerto Rico Consumer portfolio.

For the period ended June 30, 2014, 28% (June 30, 2013 - 37%) of the ALLL for BPPR non-covered loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial, personal and auto loan portfolios for 2014, and in the commercial multi-family, mortgage, and leasing portfolios for 2013.

For the period ended June 30, 2014, 23% (June 30, 2013 - 24%) of the ALLL for BPNA loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial and legacy loan portfolios for 2014 and in the commercial multi-family, commercial real estate non-owner occupied and commercial and industrial portfolios for 2013.

For the period ended December 31, 2013, 27% (2012 - 32%) of the ALLL for BPPR non-covered loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, leasing, and auto loan portfolios for 2013, and in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial, construction, credit cards, and personal loan portfolios for 2012.

For the period ended December 31, 2013, 29% (2012 – 8%) of the ALLL for BPNA loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial real estate non-owner occupied, commercial and industrial and legacy loan portfolios for 2013 and in the construction and legacy loan portfolios for 2012.

Environmental factors, which include credit and macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rate, economic activity index and delinquency rates, adopted to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical losses. The Corporation reflects the effect of these environmental factors on each loan group as an adjustment that, as appropriate, increases the historical loss rate applied to each group. Environmental factors provide updated perspective on credit and economic conditions. Regression analysis is used to select these indicators and quantify the effect on the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses.

37


Table of Contents

During the second quarter of 2014, management completed the annual review of the components of the ALLL models. As part of this review management updated core metrics and revised certain components related to the estimation process for evaluating the adequacy of the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses. These enhancements to the ALLL methodology, which are described in the paragraphs below, were implemented as of June 30, 2014 and resulted in a net decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $18.7 million for the non-covered portfolio and a net increase to the allowance for loan losses of $0.8 million for the covered portfolio.

Management made the following principal revisions to the methodology during the second quarter of 2014:

Annual review and recalibration of the environmental factors adjustment. The environmental factor adjustments are developed by performing regression analyses on selected credit and economic indicators for each applicable loan segment. During the second quarter of 2014, the environmental factor models used to account for changes in current credit and macroeconomic conditions were reviewed and recalibrated based on the latest applicable trends. Management also revised the application of environmental factors to the historical loss rates to consider last 12 month trends of the applicable credit and macroeconomic indicators applied as an incremental adjustment to account for emerging risks not necessarily considered in the historical loss rates.

The combined effect of the aforementioned recalibration and enhancements to the environmental factors adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $17 million at June 30, 2014, of which $14.1 million related to the non-covered BPPR segment and $3.7 million related to the BPNA segment, offset in part by a $0.8 million increase in the BPPR covered segment.

Increased the historical look-back period for determining the recent loss trend adjustment for consumer and mortgage loans. The Corporation increased the look-back period for assessing recent trends applicable to the determination of consumer and mortgage loan net charge-offs from 6 months to 12 months and eliminated the use of caps. Previously, the Corporation used a recent loss trend adjustment based on 6 months of net charge-offs up to a determined cap. Given the current overall consumer and mortgage credit quality improvements, management concluded that a 12-month look-back period for the recent loss trend adjustment aligns the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology to current credit quality trends while limiting excessive pro-cyclicality given the longer look-back period analysis, thus, eliminating the aforementioned caps.

The combined effect of the aforementioned enhancements to the recent loss trend adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $1 million at June 30, 2014, of which $0.9 million related to the non-covered BPPR segment and $0.1 million related to the BPNA segment.

The following tables present the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 124,134 $ 5,079 $ 137,796 $ 10,483 $ 157,248 $ 434,740

Provision (reversal of provision)

69,410 (503 ) (7,471 ) (3,380 ) 16,805 74,861

Charge-offs

(16,218 ) (42 ) (10,083 ) (1,754 ) (29,941 ) (58,038 )

Recoveries

6,909 657 157 610 6,370 14,703

Ending balance

$ 184,235 $ 5,191 $ 120,399 $ 5,959 $ 150,482 $ 466,266

38


Table of Contents

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico - Covered loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 38,589 $ 15,966 $ 38,848 $ $ 4,370 $ 97,773

Provision (reversal of provision)

13,542 (3,270 ) 2,344 1 (1,013 ) 11,604

Charge-offs

(5,993 ) (6,427 ) (2,262 ) (2 ) 677 (14,007 )

Recoveries

555 2,727 11 1 1 3,295

Ending balance

$ 46,693 $ 8,996 $ 38,941 $ $ 4,035 $ 98,665

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

U.S. Mainland - Continuing Operations

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 31,505 $ 196 $ 25,167 $ 11,872 $ 18,893 $ 87,633

Provision (reversal of provision)

(12,321 ) (45 ) (7,245 ) (3,734 ) (1,442 ) (24,787 )

Charge-offs

(5,672 ) (914 ) (1,347 ) (3,997 ) (11,930 )

Recoveries

4,762 521 2,552 1,229 9,064

Ending balance

$ 18,274 $ 151 $ 17,529 $ 9,343 $ 14,683 $ 59,980

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

U.S. Mainland - Discontinued Operations

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 16,375 $ 27 $ $ 1,400 $ 2,400 $ 20,202

Net write-downs related to loans transferred to discontinued operations

(16,375 ) (27 ) (1,400 ) (2,400 ) (20,202 )

Ending balance

$ $ $ $ $ $

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 210,603 $ 21,268 $ 201,811 $ 13,272 $ 10,483 $ 182,911 $ 640,348

Provision (reversal of provision)

70,631 (3,818 ) (12,372 ) (3,734 ) (3,379 ) 14,350 61,678

Charge-offs

(27,883 ) (6,469 ) (13,259 ) (1,347 ) (1,756 ) (33,261 ) (83,975 )

Recoveries

12,226 3,384 689 2,552 611 7,600 27,062

Net write-downs related to loans transferred to discontinued operations

(16,375 ) (27 ) (1,400 ) (2,400 ) (20,202 )

Ending balance

$ 249,202 $ 14,338 $ 176,869 $ 9,343 $ 5,959 $ 169,200 $ 624,911

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 128,150 $ 5,095 $ 130,330 $ 10,622 $ 152,578 $ 426,775

Provision (reversal of provision)

80,566 (1,897 ) 8,511 (2,863 ) 44,458 128,775

Charge-offs

(38,334 ) (458 ) (18,809 ) (2,721 ) (59,137 ) (119,459 )

Recoveries

13,853 2,451 367 921 12,583 30,175

Ending balance

$ 184,235 $ 5,191 $ 120,399 $ 5,959 $ 150,482 $ 466,266

39


Table of Contents

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico - Covered loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 42,198 $ 19,491 $ 36,006 $ $ 4,397 $ 102,092

Provision (reversal of provision)

17,581 14,297 6,842 1 (1,403 ) 37,318

Charge-offs

(13,961 ) (29,408 ) (3,918 ) (2 ) 972 (46,317 )

Recoveries

875 4,616 11 1 69 5,572

Ending balance

$ 46,693 $ 8,996 $ 38,941 $ $ 4,035 $ 98,665

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

U.S. Mainland - Continuing Operations

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 24,930 $ 214 $ 26,599 $ 11,335 $ 19,205 $ 82,283

Allowance transferred from discontinued operations

7,984 7,984

Provision (reversal of provision)

(11,742 ) (239 ) (7,807 ) (7,406 ) 2,615 (24,579 )

Charge-offs

(10,664 ) (2,452 ) (4,331 ) (9,073 ) (26,520 )

Recoveries

7,766 176 1,189 9,745 1,936 20,812

Ending balance

$ 18,274 $ 151 $ 17,529 $ 9,343 $ 14,683 $ 59,980

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

U.S. Mainland - Discontinued Operations

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 21,902 $ 33 $ $ 2,369 $ 5,101 $ 29,405

Allowance transferred to continuing operations

(7,984 ) (7,984 )

Provision (reversal of provision)

(2,831 ) (226 ) (1,812 ) (1,895 ) (6,764 )

Charge-offs

(2,995 ) (557 ) (900 ) (4,452 )

Recoveries

8,283 220 1,400 94 9,997

Net write-downs related to loans transferred to discontinued operations

(16,375 ) (27 ) (1,400 ) (2,400 ) (20,202 )

Ending balance

$ $ $ $ $ $

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 217,180 $ 24,833 $ 192,935 $ 13,704 $ 10,622 $ 181,281 $ 640,555

Provision (reversal of provision)

83,574 11,935 7,546 (9,218 ) (2,862 ) 43,775 134,750

Charge-offs

(65,954 ) (29,866 ) (25,179 ) (4,888 ) (2,723 ) (68,138 ) (196,748 )

Recoveries

30,777 7,463 1,567 11,145 922 14,682 66,556

Net write-downs related to loans transferred to discontinued operations

(16,375 ) (27 ) (1,400 ) (2,400 ) (20,202 )

Ending balance

$ 249,202 $ 14,338 $ 176,869 $ 9,343 $ 5,959 $ 169,200 $ 624,911

40


Table of Contents

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 160,883 $ 6,403 $ 130,466 $ 3,895 $ 122,374 $ 424,021

Provision (reversal of provision)

(18,763 ) 375 204,540 6,241 38,068 230,461

Charge-offs

(35,270 ) (2,191 ) (12,750 ) (1,843 ) (27,247 ) (79,301 )

Recoveries

5,302 4,485 161 630 7,319 17,897

Net write-down related to loans sold

(199,502 ) (199,502 )

Ending balance

$ 112,152 $ 9,072 $ 122,915 $ 8,923 $ 140,514 $ 393,576

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

Puerto Rico - Covered Loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 67,681 $ 6,293 $ 20,673 $ $ 5,220 $ 99,867

Provision (reversal of provision)

(1,016 ) 16,762 8,583 1,171 25,500

Charge-offs

(1,150 ) (16,024 ) (2,255 ) 106 (19,323 )

Recoveries

42 322 49 413

Ending balance

$ 65,557 $ 7,353 $ 27,001 $ $ 6,546 $ 106,457

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

U.S. Mainland - Continuing Operations

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 30,169 $ 775 $ 31,479 $ 27,139 $ 23,222 $ 112,784

Provision (reversal of provision)

(432 ) (474 ) 4,604 (12,102 ) 6,918 (1,486 )

Charge-offs

(7,116 ) (3,377 ) (3,743 ) (5,959 ) (20,195 )

Recoveries

4,972 359 5,208 816 11,355

Ending balance

$ 27,593 $ 301 $ 33,065 $ 16,502 $ 24,997 $ 102,458

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

U.S. Mainland - Discontinued Operations

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 37,818 $ 261 $ $ 3,638 $ 4,979 $ 46,696

Provision (reversal of provision)

(5,418 ) (224 ) 386 189 (5,067 )

Charge-offs

(10,282 ) (2,198 ) (882 ) (13,362 )

Recoveries

2,618 1,650 193 4,461

Ending balance

$ 24,736 $ 37 $ $ 3,476 $ 4,479 $ 32,728

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 296,551 $ 13,732 $ 182,618 $ 30,777 $ 3,895 $ 155,795 $ 683,368

Provision (reversal of provision)

(25,629 ) 16,439 217,727 (11,716 ) 6,241 46,346 249,408

Charge-offs

(53,818 ) (18,215 ) (18,382 ) (5,941 ) (1,843 ) (33,982 ) (132,181 )

Recoveries

12,934 4,807 520 6,858 630 8,377 34,126

Net write-down related to loans sold

(199,502 ) (199,502 )

Ending balance

$ 230,038 $ 16,763 $ 182,981 $ 19,978 $ 8,923 $ 176,536 $ 635,219

41


Table of Contents

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 217,615 $ 5,862 $ 119,027 $ 2,894 $ 99,899 $ 445,297

Provision

110,114 3,117 232,752 8,226 80,544 434,753

Charge-offs

(67,716 ) (3,820 ) (30,509 ) (3,386 ) (54,607 ) (160,038 )

Recoveries

13,436 5,759 1,147 1,189 14,678 36,209

Net write-downs related to loans sold

(161,297 ) (1,846 ) (199,502 ) (362,645 )

Ending balance

$ 112,152 $ 9,072 $ 122,915 $ 8,923 $ 140,514 $ 393,576

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

Puerto Rico - Covered Loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 72,060 $ 9,946 $ 20,914 $ $ 5,986 $ 108,906

Provision

5,140 22,554 10,393 4,969 43,056

Charge-offs

(11,715 ) (25,783 ) (4,317 ) (4,461 ) (46,276 )

Recoveries

72 636 11 52 771

Ending balance

$ 65,557 $ 7,353 $ 27,001 $ $ 6,546 $ 106,457

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

U.S. Mainland - Continuing Operations

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 36,658 $ 1,196 $ 30,348 $ 29,070 $ 26,383 $ 123,655

Provision (reversal of provision)

(486 ) (895 ) 8,525 (12,968 ) 9,139 3,315

Charge-offs

(15,068 ) (7,394 ) (9,278 ) (12,208 ) (43,948 )

Recoveries

6,489 1,586 9,678 1,683 19,436

Ending balance

$ 27,593 $ 301 $ 33,065 $ 16,502 $ 24,997 $ 102,458

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

U.S. Mainland - Discontinued Operations

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 43,409 $ 371 $ $ 4,032 $ 4,937 $ 52,749

Provision (reversal of provision)

(8,583 ) (334 ) 55 1,002 (7,860 )

Charge-offs

(15,470 ) (3,004 ) (1,830 ) (20,304 )

Recoveries

5,380 2,393 370 8,143

Ending balance

$ 24,736 $ 37 $ $ 3,476 $ 4,479 $ 32,728

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 369,742 $ 17,375 $ 170,289 $ 33,102 $ 2,894 $ 137,205 $ 730,607

Provision (reversal of provision)

106,185 24,442 251,670 (12,913 ) 8,226 95,654 473,264

Charge-offs

(109,969 ) (29,603 ) (42,220 ) (12,282 ) (3,386 ) (73,106 ) (270,566 )

Recoveries

25,377 6,395 2,744 12,071 1,189 16,783 64,559

Net write-down related to loans sold

(161,297 ) (1,846 ) (199,502 ) (362,645 )

Ending balance

$ 230,038 $ 16,763 $ 182,981 $ 19,978 $ 8,923 $ 176,536 $ 635,219

42


Table of Contents

The following table provides the activity in the allowance for loan losses related to covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30.

ASC 310-30 Covered loans
For the quarters ended For the six months ended

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 90,371 $ 91,573 $ 93,915 $ 95,407

Provision for loan losses

10,951 17,568 35,506 31,608

Net charge-offs

(10,430 ) (17,946 ) (38,529 ) (35,820 )

Balance at end of period

$ 90,892 $ 91,195 $ 90,892 $ 91,195

The following tables present information at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 regarding loan ending balances and the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and whether such loans and the allowance pertains to loans individually or collectively evaluated for impairment.

At June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Specific ALLL non-covered loans

$ 36,597 $ 883 $ 39,341 $ 688 $ 28,458 $ 105,967

General ALLL non-covered loans

147,638 4,308 81,058 5,271 122,024 360,299

ALLL—non-covered loans

184,235 5,191 120,399 5,959 150,482 466,266

Specific ALLL covered loans

8 8

General ALLL covered loans

46,685 8,996 38,941 4,035 98,657

ALLL—covered loans

46,693 8,996 38,941 4,035 98,665

Total ALLL

$ 230,928 $ 14,187 $ 159,340 $ 5,959 $ 154,517 $ 564,931

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 307,762 $ 21,094 $ 414,636 $ 2,653 $ 119,604 $ 865,749

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

5,991,218 114,589 5,043,936 544,215 3,296,245 14,990,203

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

6,298,980 135,683 5,458,572 546,868 3,415,849 15,855,952

Impaired covered loans

2,823 2,419 5,242

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

1,743,144 80,344 867,075 40,297 2,730,860

Covered loans held-in-portfolio

1,745,967 82,763 867,075 40,297 2,736,102

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 8,044,947 $ 218,446 $ 6,325,647 $ 546,868 $ 3,456,146 $ 18,592,054

At June 30, 2014

U.S. Mainland

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Specific ALLL

$ $ $ 14,474 $ $ 585 $ 15,059

General ALLL

18,274 151 3,055 9,343 14,098 44,921

Total ALLL

$ 18,274 $ 151 $ 17,529 $ 9,343 $ 14,683 $ 59,980

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired loans

$ 9,984 $ $ 51,607 $ 2,536 $ 2,502 $ 66,629

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans

1,846,583 43,376 1,154,269 160,405 508,010 3,712,643

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 1,856,567 $ 43,376 $ 1,205,876 $ 162,941 $ 510,512 $ 3,779,272

43


Table of Contents

At June 30, 2014

Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Specific ALLL non-covered loans

$ 36,597 $ 883 $ 53,815 $ $ 688 $ 29,043 $ 121,026

General ALLL non-covered loans

165,912 4,459 84,113 9,343 5,271 136,122 405,220

ALLL—non-covered loans

202,509 5,342 137,928 9,343 5,959 165,165 526,246

Specific ALLL covered loans

8 8

General ALLL covered loans

46,685 8,996 38,941 4,035 98,657

ALLL—covered loans

46,693 8,996 38,941 4,035 98,665

Total ALLL

$ 249,202 $ 14,338 $ 176,869 $ 9,343 $ 5,959 $ 169,200 $ 624,911

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 317,746 $ 21,094 $ 466,243 $ 2,536 $ 2,653 $ 122,106 $ 932,378

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

7,837,801 157,965 6,198,205 160,405 544,215 3,804,255 18,702,846

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

8,155,547 179,059 6,664,448 162,941 546,868 3,926,361 19,635,224

Impaired covered loans

2,823 2,419 5,242

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

1,743,144 80,344 867,075 40,297 2,730,860

Covered loans held-in-portfolio

1,745,967 82,763 867,075 40,297 2,736,102

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 9,901,514 $ 261,822 $ 7,531,523 $ 162,941 $ 546,868 $ 3,966,658 $ 22,371,326

At December 31, 2013

Puerto Rico

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Specific ALLL non-covered loans

$ 16,409 $ 177 $ 38,034 $ 1,053 $ 29,920 $ 85,593

General ALLL non-covered loans

111,741 4,918 92,296 9,569 122,658 341,182

ALLL—non-covered loans

128,150 5,095 130,330 10,622 152,578 426,775

Specific ALLL covered loans

153 140 293

General ALLL covered loans

42,045 19,351 36,006 4,397 101,799

ALLL—covered loans

42,198 19,491 36,006 4,397 102,092

Total ALLL

$ 170,348 $ 24,586 $ 166,336 $ 10,622 $ 156,975 $ 528,867

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 245,380 $ 16,823 $ 399,347 $ 2,893 $ 125,342 $ 789,785

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

6,220,210 144,348 5,001,332 540,868 3,191,296 15,098,054

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

6,465,590 161,171 5,400,679 543,761 3,316,638 15,887,839

Impaired covered loans

20,945 20,945

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

1,791,859 190,127 934,373 47,123 2,963,482

Covered loans held-in-portfolio

1,812,804 190,127 934,373 47,123 2,984,427

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 8,278,394 $ 351,298 $ 6,335,052 $ 543,761 $ 3,363,761 $ 18,872,266

44


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2013

U.S. Mainland

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Specific ALLL

$ $ $ 17,633 $ $ 280 $ 17,913

General ALLL

46,832 247 8,966 13,704 24,026 93,775

Total ALLL

$ 46,832 $ 247 $ 26,599 $ 13,704 $ 24,306 $ 111,688

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired loans

$ 52,136 $ 5,663 $ 52,726 $ 6,045 $ 2,361 $ 118,931

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans

3,519,459 39,250 1,228,071 205,090 613,227 5,605,097

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 3,571,595 $ 44,913 $ 1,280,797 $ 211,135 $ 615,588 $ 5,724,028

At December 31, 2013

Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Specific ALLL non-covered loans

$ 16,409 $ 177 $ 55,667 $ $ 1,053 $ 30,200 $ 103,506

General ALLL non-covered loans

158,573 5,165 101,262 13,704 9,569 146,684 434,957

ALLL—non-covered loans

174,982 5,342 156,929 13,704 10,622 176,884 538,463

Specific ALLL covered loans

153 140 293

General ALLL covered loans

42,045 19,351 36,006 4,397 101,799

ALLL—covered loans

42,198 19,491 36,006 4,397 102,092

Total ALLL

$ 217,180 $ 24,833 $ 192,935 $ 13,704 $ 10,622 $ 181,281 $ 640,555

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 297,516 $ 22,486 $ 452,073 $ 6,045 $ 2,893 $ 127,703 $ 908,716

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

9,739,669 183,598 6,229,403 205,090 540,868 3,804,523 20,703,151

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

10,037,185 206,084 6,681,476 211,135 543,761 3,932,226 21,611,867

Impaired covered loans

20,945 20,945

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

1,791,859 190,127 934,373 47,123 2,963,482

Covered loans held-in-portfolio

1,812,804 190,127 934,373 47,123 2,984,427

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 11,849,989 $ 396,211 $ 7,615,849 $ 211,135 $ 543,761 $ 3,979,349 $ 24,596,294

45


Table of Contents

Impaired loans

The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans – Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial multi-family

$ $ $ $ 1,305 $ 1,305 $ 1,305 $ 1,305 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

54,933 59,622 9,877 24,911 25,724 79,844 85,346 9,877

Commercial real estate owner occupied

73,799 94,235 12,352 45,797 53,876 119,596 148,111 12,352

Commercial and industrial

75,216 77,283 14,368 31,801 42,746 107,017 120,029 14,368

Construction

10,213 16,937 883 10,881 31,380 21,094 48,317 883

Mortgage

370,863 393,190 39,341 43,773 43,773 414,636 436,963 39,341

Leasing

2,653 2,653 688 2,653 2,653 688

Consumer:

Credit cards

42,581 42,581 8,068 42,581 42,581 8,068

Personal

74,247 74,247 20,064 74,247 74,247 20,064

Auto

2,292 2,292 234 2,292 2,292 234

Other

484 484 92 484 484 92

Covered loans

1,591 1,591 8 3,651 28,947 5,242 30,538 8

Total Puerto Rico

$ 708,872 $ 765,115 $ 105,975 $ 162,119 $ 227,751 $ 870,991 $ 992,866 $ 105,975

June 30, 2014

U.S. mainland [1]

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans – Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial multi-family

$ $ $ $ 1,960 $ 1,960 $ 1,960 $ 1,960 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

5,827 10,307 5,827 10,307

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1,542 1,542 1,542 1,542

Commercial and industrial

655 655 655 655

Mortgage

44,310 49,084 14,474 7,297 9,367 51,607 58,451 14,474

Legacy

2,536 4,226 2,536 4,226

Consumer:

HELOCs

2,410 2,410 581 2,410 2,410 581

Auto

86 86 86 86

Other

6 6 4 6 6 4

Total U.S. mainland

$ 46,726 $ 51,500 $ 15,059 $ 19,903 $ 28,143 $ 66,629 $ 79,643 $ 15,059

[1] Excludes impaired loans from discontinued operations.

46


Table of Contents

June 30, 2014

Popular, Inc.

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans – Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial multi-family

$ $ $ $ 3,265 $ 3,265 $ 3,265 $ 3,265 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

54,933 59,622 9,877 30,738 36,031 85,671 95,653 9,877

Commercial real estate owner occupied

73,799 94,235 12,352 47,339 55,418 121,138 149,653 12,352

Commercial and industrial

75,216 77,283 14,368 32,456 43,401 107,672 120,684 14,368

Construction

10,213 16,937 883 10,881 31,380 21,094 48,317 883

Mortgage

415,173 442,274 53,815 51,070 53,140 466,243 495,414 53,815

Legacy

2,536 4,226 2,536 4,226

Leasing

2,653 2,653 688 2,653 2,653 688

Consumer:

Credit cards

42,581 42,581 8,068 42,581 42,581 8,068

HELOCs

2,410 2,410 581 2,410 2,410 581

Personal

74,247 74,247 20,064 74,247 74,247 20,064

Auto

2,292 2,292 234 86 86 2,378 2,378 234

Other

490 490 96 490 490 96

Covered loans

1,591 1,591 8 3,651 28,947 5,242 30,538 8

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 755,598 $ 816,615 $ 121,034 $ 182,022 $ 255,894 $ 937,620 $ 1,072,509 $ 121,034

December 31, 2013

Puerto Rico

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans – Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial multi-family

$ $ $ $ 3,405 $ 6,942 $ 3,405 $ 6,942 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

19,120 19,407 2,368 47,245 55,397 66,365 74,804 2,368

Commercial real estate owner occupied

55,826 74,420 6,473 33,749 47,545 89,575 121,965 6,473

Commercial and industrial

30,370 33,152 7,568 55,665 68,141 86,035 101,293 7,568

Construction

2,324 9,047 177 14,499 36,951 16,823 45,998 177

Mortgage

358,437 376,393 38,034 40,910 45,181 399,347 421,574 38,034

Leasing

2,893 2,893 1,053 2,893 2,893 1,053

Consumer:

Credit cards

45,015 45,015 8,344 45,015 45,015 8,344

Personal

78,475 78,475 21,313 78,475 78,475 21,313

Auto

1,354 1,354 171 1,354 1,354 171

Other

498 498 92 498 498 92

Covered loans

12,837 17,538 293 8,108 10,063 20,945 27,601 293

Total Puerto Rico

$ 607,149 $ 658,192 $ 85,886 $ 203,581 $ 270,220 $ 810,730 $ 928,412 $ 85,886

December 31, 2013

U.S. mainland

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans – Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial multi-family

$ $ $ $ 7,668 $ 10,870 $ 7,668 $ 10,870 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

27,016 37,393 27,016 37,393

Commercial real estate owner occupied

15,624 19,910 15,624 19,910

Commercial and industrial

1,828 1,828 1,828 1,828

Construction

5,663 5,663 5,663 5,663

Mortgage

46,192 50,570 17,633 6,534 8,513 52,726 59,083 17,633

Legacy

6,045 8,715 6,045 8,715

Consumer:

HELOCs

198 198 198 198

Auto

88 88 88 88

Other

2,075 2,075 280 2,075 2,075 280

Total U.S. mainland

$ 48,267 $ 52,645 $ 17,913 $ 70,664 $ 93,178 $ 118,931 $ 145,823 $ 17,913

47


Table of Contents

December 31, 2013

Popular, Inc.

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans – Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial multi-family

$ $ $ $ 11,073 $ 17,812 $ 11,073 $ 17,812 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

19,120 19,407 2,368 74,261 92,790 93,381 112,197 2,368

Commercial real estate owner occupied

55,826 74,420 6,473 49,373 67,455 105,199 141,875 6,473

Commercial and industrial

30,370 33,152 7,568 57,493 69,969 87,863 103,121 7,568

Construction

2,324 9,047 177 20,162 42,614 22,486 51,661 177

Mortgage

404,629 426,963 55,667 47,444 53,694 452,073 480,657 55,667

Legacy

6,045 8,715 6,045 8,715

Leasing

2,893 2,893 1,053 2,893 2,893 1,053

Consumer:

Credit cards

45,015 45,015 8,344 45,015 45,015 8,344

HELOCs

198 198 198 198

Personal

78,475 78,475 21,313 78,475 78,475 21,313

Auto

1,354 1,354 171 88 88 1,442 1,442 171

Other

2,573 2,573 372 2,573 2,573 372

Covered loans

12,837 17,538 293 8,108 10,063 20,945 27,601 293

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 655,416 $ 710,837 $ 103,799 $ 274,245 $ 363,398 $ 929,661 $ 1,074,235 $ 103,799

The following tables present the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico U.S. Mainland [1] Popular, Inc.
Average Interest Average Interest Average Interest
recorded income recorded income recorded income

(In thousands)

investment recognized investment recognized investment recognized

Commercial multi-family

$ 2,144 $ $ 2,808 $ $ 4,952 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

77,906 696 9,653 24 87,559 720

Commercial real estate owner occupied

113,400 728 6,632 30 120,032 758

Commercial and industrial

112,697 1,717 1,122 113,819 1,717

Construction

21,553 21,553

Mortgage

410,345 5,081 52,034 485 462,379 5,566

Legacy

3,123 3,123

Leasing

2,554 2,554

Consumer:

Credit cards

43,241 43,241

Helocs

2,431 2,431

Personal

74,918 74,918

Auto

1,910 87 1,997

Other

880 6 886

Covered loans

5,391 118 5,391 118

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 866,939 $ 8,340 $ 77,896 $ 539 $ 944,835 $ 8,879

[1] Excludes impaired loans from discontinued operations.

48


Table of Contents

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

Puerto Rico U.S. Mainland Popular, Inc.
Average Interest Average Interest Average Interest
recorded income recorded income recorded income

(In thousands)

investment recognized investment recognized investment recognized

Commercial multi-family

$ 8,448 $ (29 ) $ 6,619 $ $ 15,067 $ (29 )

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

47,621 364 38,509 55 86,130 419

Commercial real estate owner occupied

98,892 493 20,235 73 119,127 566

Commercial and industrial

96,622 769 1,457 98,079 769

Construction

41,528 5,859 47,387

Mortgage

480,435 7,861 53,000 482 533,435 8,343

Legacy

14,200 14,200

Leasing

4,088 4,088

Consumer:

Credit cards

34,019 34,019

Helocs

200 200

Personal

83,531 83,531

Auto

858 90 948

Other

274 2,311 2,585

Covered loans

24,252 265 24,252 265

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 920,568 $ 9,723 $ 142,480 $ 610 $ 1,063,048 $ 10,333

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

Puerto Rico U.S. Mainland [1] Popular, Inc.
Average Interest Average Interest Average Interest
recorded income recorded income recorded income

(In thousands)

investment recognized investment recognized investment recognized

Commercial multi-family

$ 2,564 $ $ 4,428 $ $ 6,992 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

74,059 8 15,440 24 89,499 32

Commercial real estate owner occupied

105,458 1,191 9,629 30 115,087 1,221

Commercial and industrial

103,810 1,581 1,357 105,167 1,581

Construction

19,976 3,329 1,888 21,864 3,329

Mortgage

406,679 10,263 52,264 992 458,943 11,255

Legacy

4,097 4,097

Leasing

2,667 2,667

Consumer:

Credit cards

43,832 43,832

HELOCs

1,687 1,687

Personal

76,104 76,104

Auto

1,724 87 1,811

Other

752 696 1,448

Covered loans

10,576 234 10,576 234

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 848,201 $ 16,606 $ 91,573 $ 1,046 $ 939,774 $ 17,652

[1] Excludes impaired loans from discontinued operations.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

Puerto Rico U.S. Mainland Popular, Inc.
Average Interest Average Interest Average Interest
recorded income recorded income recorded income

(In thousands)

investment recognized investment recognized investment recognized

Commercial multi-family

$ 10,082 $ 132 $ 6,960 $ 39 $ 17,042 $ 171

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

57,631 723 40,944 90 98,575 813

Commercial real estate owner occupied

139,981 1,009 20,280 15 160,261 1,024

Commercial and industrial

109,286 1,608 2,990 112,276 1,608

Construction

39,635 5,893 45,528

Mortgage

506,002 15,596 53,364 985 559,366 16,581

Legacy

15,714 15,714

Leasing

4,352 4,352

Consumer:

Credit cards

36,851 36,851

HELOCs

200 200

Personal

84,648 84,648

Auto

829 90 919

Other

347 2,348 2,695

Covered loans

52,582 504 52,582 504

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 1,042,226 $ 19,572 $ 148,783 $ 1,129 $ 1,191,009 $ 20,701

49


Table of Contents

Modifications

Troubled debt restructurings related to non-covered loan portfolios amounted to $ 1.0 billion at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $ 1.0 billion). The amount of outstanding commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing receivables whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings amounted $4 million related to the commercial loan portfolio and $697 thousand related to the construction loan portfolio at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $3 million and $0, respectively).

A modification of a loan constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the modification constitutes a concession.

Commercial and industrial loans modified in a TDR often involve temporary interest-only payments, term extensions, and converting evergreen revolving credit lines to long-term loans. Commercial real estate (“CRE”), which includes multifamily, owner-occupied and non-owner occupied CRE, and construction loans modified in a TDR often involve reducing the interest rate for a limited period of time or the remaining term of the loan, extending the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or reductions in the payment plan. Construction loans modified in a TDR may also involve extending the interest-only payment period.

Residential mortgage loans modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where monthly payments are lowered to accommodate the borrowers’ financial needs for a period of time, normally five years to ten years. After the lowered monthly payment period ends, the borrower reverts back to paying principal and interest per the original terms with the maturity date adjusted accordingly.

Home equity loans modifications are made infrequently and are not offered if the Corporation also holds the first mortgage. Home equity loans modifications are uniquely designed to meet the specific needs of each borrower. Automobile loans modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where the Corporation has lowered monthly payments by extending the term. Credit cards modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where monthly payments are lowered to accommodate the borrowers’ financial needs for a period of time, normally up to 24 months.

As part of its NPL reduction strategy and in order to expedite the resolution of delinquent construction and commercial loans, commencing in 2012, the Corporation routinely enters into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors through the regular legal process, bankruptcy procedures and in certain occasions, out of court transactions. These liquidation agreements, in general, contemplate the following conditions: (1) consent to judgment by the borrowers and guarantors; (2) acknowledgement by the borrower of the debt, its liquidity and maturity; and (3) acknowledgment of the default in payments. The contractual interest rate is not reduced and continues to accrue during the term of the agreement. At the end of the period, the borrower is obligated to remit all amounts due or be subject to the Corporation’s exercise of its foreclosure rights and further collection efforts. Likewise, the borrower’s failure to make stipulated payments will grant the Corporation the ability to exercise its foreclosure rights. This strategy tends to expedite the foreclosure process, resulting in a more effective and efficient collection process. Although in general, these liquidation agreements do not contemplate the forgiveness of principal or interest as debtor is required to cover all outstanding amounts when the agreement becomes due, it could be construed that the Corporation has granted a concession by temporarily accepting a payment schedule that is different from the contractual payment schedule. Accordingly, loans under these program agreements are considered TDRs.

Loans modified in a TDR that are not accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 are typically already in non-accrual status at the time of the modification and partial charge-offs have in some cases already been taken against the outstanding loan balance. The TDR loan continues in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (generally at least six months of sustained performance after the modification (or one year for loans providing for quarterly or semi-annual payments)) and management has concluded that it is probable that the borrower would not be in payment default in the foreseeable future.

Loans modified in a TDR may have the financial effect to the Corporation of increasing the specific allowance for loan losses associated with the loan. Consumer and residential mortgage loans modified under the Corporation’s loss mitigation programs that are determined to be TDRs are individually evaluated for impairment based on an analysis of discounted cash flows.

For consumer and mortgage loans that are modified with regard to payment terms and which constitute TDRs, the discounted cash flow value method is used as the impairment valuation is more appropriately calculated based on the ongoing cash flow from the individuals rather than the liquidation of the asset. The computations give consideration to probability of defaults and loss-given-foreclosure on the related estimated cash flows.

50


Table of Contents

Commercial and construction loans that have been modified as part of loss mitigation efforts are evaluated individually for impairment. The vast majority of the Corporation’s modified commercial loans are measured for impairment using the estimated fair value of the collateral, as these are normally considered as collateral dependent loans. The Corporation may also measure commercial loans at their estimated realizable values determined by discounting the expected future cash flows. Construction loans that have been modified are also accounted for as collateral dependent loans. The Corporation determines the fair value measurement dependent upon its exit strategy for the particular asset(s) acquired in foreclosure.

The following tables present the non-covered and covered loans classified as TDRs according to their accruing status at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Popular, Inc.
Non-Covered Loans
June 30, 2014 [1] December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Accruing Non-Accruing Total Accruing Non-Accruing Total

Commercial

$ 109,205 $ 113,148 $ 222,353 $ 109,462 $ 80,140 $ 189,602

Construction

376 13,391 13,767 425 10,865 11,290

Legacy

949 949

Mortgage

566,355 100,381 666,736 535,357 82,786 618,143

Leases

875 1,778 2,653 270 2,623 2,893

Consumer

110,066 11,681 121,747 116,719 10,741 127,460

Total

$ 786,877 $ 240,379 $ 1,027,256 $ 762,233 $ 188,104 $ 950,337

[1]    Excludes TDRs from discontinued operations.

Popular, Inc.
Covered Loans
June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Accruing Non-Accruing Total Accruing Non-Accruing Total

Commercial

$ 14 $ 2,384 $ 2,398 $ 7,389 $ 10,017 $ 17,406

Construction

2,962 2,962 3,464 3,464

Mortgage

2,804 592 3,396 146 189 335

Consumer

106 15 121 221 22 243

Total

$ 2,924 $ 5,953 $ 8,877 $ 7,756 $ 13,692 $ 21,448

51


Table of Contents

The following tables present the loan count by type of modification for those loans modified in a TDR during the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Puerto Rico
For the quarter ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended June 30, 2014
Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

3 2 4

Commercial real estate owner occupied

6 5 15 7

Commercial and industrial

14 6 23 6

Construction

3

Mortgage

14 12 110 43 27 26 190 67

Leasing

1 18 5 24

Consumer:

Credit cards

273 172 547 327

Personal

247 16 2 463 33 3

Auto

6 3 8 3

Other

25 1 43 2

Total

579 49 131 218 1,120 92 217 399

U.S. Mainland
For the quarter ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended June 30, 2014
Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other

Mortgage

5 11

Total

5 11

Excludes TDRs from discontinued operations.

Popular, Inc.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended June 30, 2014
Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

3 2 4

Commercial real estate owner occupied

6 5 15 7

Commercial and industrial

14 6 23 6

Construction

3

Mortgage

14 12 115 43 27 26 201 67

Leasing

1 18 5 24

Consumer:

Credit cards

273 172 547 327

Personal

247 16 2 463 33 3

Auto

6 3 8 3

Other

25 1 43 2

Total

579 49 136 218 1,120 92 228 399

Excludes TDRs from discontinued operations.

52


Table of Contents
Puerto Rico
For the quarter ended June 30, 2013 For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

1

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1 33 2 1 33

Commercial and industrial

8 2 8 10 4 8

Mortgage

5 14 85 7 9 27 215 13

Leasing

2 5 12 13

Consumer:

Credit cards

272 246 560 482

Personal

223 6 3 455 14 3

Auto

2 2

Other

26 45

Total

535 26 90 297 1,081 61 228 539

U.S. Mainland
For the quarter ended June 30, 2013 For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 2 2

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1

Mortgage

5 8

Total

7 2 11

Popular, Inc.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2013 For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in
interest rate and
extension of
maturity date
Other

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 3 2

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1 33 2 1 1 33

Commercial and industrial

8 2 8 10 4 8

Mortgage

5 14 90 7 9 27 223 13

Leasing

2 5 12 13

Consumer:

Credit cards

272 246 560 482

Personal

223 6 3 455 14 3

Auto

2 2

Other

26 45

Total

535 26 97 297 1,081 63 239 539

53


Table of Contents

The following tables present by class, quantitative information related to loans modified as TDRs during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Puerto Rico

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses
as a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

3 $ 1,486 $ 1,461 $ 141

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11 31,629 31,193 1,446

Commercial and industrial

20 41,418 41,205 60

Mortgage

179 26,651 26,411 804

Leasing

19 507 510 103

Consumer:

Credit cards

445 3,369 3,811 602

Personal

265 4,374 4,391 854

Auto

9 144 149 9

Other

26 66 65 11

Total

977 $ 109,644 $ 109,196 $ 4,030

U.S. Mainland

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Mortgage

5 $ 643 $ 763 $ 245

Total

5 $ 643 $ 763 $ 245

Popular, Inc.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

3 $ 1,486 $ 1,461 $ 141

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11 31,629 31,193 1,446

Commercial and industrial

20 41,418 41,205 60

Mortgage

184 27,294 27,174 1,049

Leasing

19 507 510 103

Consumer:

Credit cards

445 3,369 3,811 602

Personal

265 4,374 4,391 854

Auto

9 144 149 9

Other

26 66 65 11

Total

982 $ 110,287 $ 109,959 $ 4,275

Puerto Rico

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses
as a result of modification

Commercial real estate owner occupied

34 $ 10,646 $ 8,628 $ (161 )

Commercial and industrial

18 3,583 3,623 (17 )

Mortgage

111 18,046 19,192 878

Leasing

7 116 114 30

Consumer:

Credit cards

518 3,879 4,649 718

Personal

232 3,810 3,821 985

Auto

2 38 40 2

Other

26 120 119 19

Total

948 $ 40,238 $ 40,186 $ 2,454

54


Table of Contents

U.S. Mainland

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification outstanding
recorded investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 $ 1,228 $ 1,154 $

Mortgage

5 702 731 49

Total

7 $ 1,930 $ 1,885 $ 49

Popular, Inc.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification outstanding
recorded investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 $ 1,228 $ 1,154 $

Commercial real estate owner occupied

34 10,646 8,628 (161 )

Commercial and industrial

18 3,583 3,623 (17 )

Mortgage

116 18,748 19,923 927

Leasing

7 116 114 30

Consumer:

Credit cards

518 3,879 4,649 718

Personal

232 3,810 3,821 985

Auto

2 38 40 2

Other

26 120 119 19

Total

955 $ 42,168 $ 42,071 $ 2,503

Puerto Rico

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

6 $ 2,862 2,915 $ 78

Commercial real estate owner occupied

22 33,258 32,810 1,420

Commercial and industrial

29 42,191 41,975 69

Construction

3 11,358 11,358 (570 )

Mortgage

310 46,037 46,936 1,942

Leasing

29 713 717 166

Consumer:

Credit cards

874 6,952 7,902 1,229

Personal

499 8,449 8,465 1,766

Auto

11 176 182 10

Other

45 103 102 17

Total

1,828 $ 152,099 $ 153,362 $ 6,127

U.S. mainland

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Mortgage

11 $ 1,568 $ 1,827 $ 240

Total

11 $ 1,568 $ 1,827 $ 240

Excludes TDRs from discontinued operations.

55


Table of Contents

Popular, Inc.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

6 $ 2,862 $ 2,915 $ 78

Commercial real estate owner occupied

22 33,258 32,810 1,420

Commercial and industrial

29 42,191 41,975 69

Construction

3 11,358 11,358 (570 )

Mortgage

321 47,605 48,763 2,182

Leasing

29 713 717 166

Consumer:

Credit cards

874 6,952 7,902 1,229

Personal

499 8,449 8,465 1,766

Auto

11 176 182 10

Other

45 103 102 17

Total

1,839 $ 153,667 $ 155,189 $ 6,367

Excludes TDRs from discontinued operations.

Puerto Rico

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

1 $ 1,248 $ 741 $ (10 )

Commercial real estate owner occupied

36 15,212 13,214 (501 )

Commercial and industrial

22 3,743 3,784 (18 )

Mortgage

264 42,944 45,981 4,305

Leasing

25 443 429 133

Consumer:

Credit cards

1,042 8,144 9,795 755

Personal

472 7,642 7,667 1,978

Auto

2 38 40 2

Other

45 169 167 19

Total

1,909 $ 79,583 $ 81,818 $ 6,663

U.S. mainland

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

4 $ 2,822 $ 2,713 $ (2 )

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1 381 287 (10 )

Mortgage

8 928 959 72

Total

13 $ 4,131 $ 3,959 $ 60

56


Table of Contents

Popular, Inc.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

5 $ 4,070 $ 3,454 $ (12 )

Commercial real estate owner occupied

37 15,593 13,501 (511 )

Commercial and industrial

22 3,743 3,784 (18 )

Mortgage

272 43,872 46,940 4,377

Leasing

25 443 429 133

Consumer:

Credit cards

1,042 8,144 9,795 755

Personal

472 7,642 7,667 1,978

Auto

2 38 40 2

Other

45 169 167 19

Total

1,922 $ 83,714 $ 85,777 $ 6,723

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, there were no restructured notes. During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, one loan of $2.9 million, was restructured into multiple notes (“Note A / B split”). The Corporation recorded $1.3 million of charge-offs as part of the loan restructuring during the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The renegotiation of this loan was made after analyzing the borrowers’ capacity to repay the debt, collateral and ability to perform under the modified terms. The recorded investment on this commercial TDR amounted to approximately $1.6 million at June 30, 2013 with related allowance for loan losses of $21 thousand.

The following tables present by class, TDRs that were subject to payment default and that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months preceding the default date. Payment default is defined as a restructured loan becoming 90 days past due after being modified, foreclosed or charged-off, whichever occurs first. The recorded investment at June 30, 2014 is inclusive of all partial paydowns and charge-offs since the modification date. Loans modified as a TDR that were fully paid down, charged-off or foreclosed upon by period end are not reported.

Puerto Rico

Defaulted during the quarter ended June 30,
2014
Defaulted during the six months ended June 30,
2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Recorded investment as of first
default date
Loan count Recorded investment as of first
default date

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

$ 1 $ 30

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1 44 3 377

Commercial and industrial

2 438 5 609

Mortgage

33 6,225 55 10,915

Leasing

4 52 7 87

Consumer:

Credit cards

133 1,329 256 2,408

Personal

30 345 55 666

Auto

5 84 10 186

Total

208 $ 8,517 392 $ 15,278

57


Table of Contents

For U.S Mainland for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 there were no TDRs that were subject to payment default and that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months preceding the default date.

Popular, Inc.

Defaulted during the quarter ended June 30,
2014
Defaulted during the six months ended June 30,
2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Recorded
investment as of
first default date
Loan count Recorded
investment as of
first default date

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

$ 1 $ 30

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1 44 3 377

Commercial and industrial

2 438 5 609

Mortgage

33 6,225 55 10,915

Legacy

4 52 7 87

Consumer:

Credit cards

133 1,329 256 2,408

Personal

30 345 55 666

Auto

5 84 10 186

Total

208 $ 8,517 392 $ 15,278

Puerto Rico

Defaulted during the quarter ended June 30,
2013
Defaulted during the six months ended June 30,
2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Recorded investment as of first
default date
Loan count Recorded investment as of first
default date

Commercial real estate owner occupied

2 $ 5,127 2 $ 5,127

Commercial and industrial

1 504 2 1,436

Mortgage

68 11,730 131 20,601

Leasing

3 21 10 65

Consumer:

Credit cards

169 1,807 300 2,927

Personal

30 415 71 992

Total

273 $ 19,604 516 $ 31,148

U.S. Mainland

Defaulted during the quarter ended June 30,
2013
Defaulted during the six months ended June 30,
2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Recorded investment as of first
default date
Loan count Recorded investment as of first
default date

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

$ 1 $ 1,139

Total

$ 1 $ 1,139

58


Table of Contents

Popular, Inc.

Defaulted during the quarter ended June 30,
2013
Defaulted during the six months ended June 30,
2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Recorded
investment as of
first default date
Loan count Recorded
investment as of
first default date

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

1 $ 1,139

Commercial real estate owner occupied

2 $ 5,127 2 5,127

Commercial and industrial

1 504 2 1,436

Mortgage

68 11,730 131 20,601

Leasing

3 21 10 65

Consumer:

Credit cards

169 1,807 300 2,927

Personal

30 415 71 992

Total

273 $ 19,604 517 $ 32,287

Commercial, consumer and mortgage loans modified in a TDR are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the Corporation evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The allowance for loan losses may be increased or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.

Credit Quality

The following table presents the outstanding balance, net of unearned income, of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio based on the Corporation’s assignment of obligor risk ratings as defined at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Watch Special
Mention
Substandard Doubtful Loss Sub-total Pass/
Unrated
Total

Puerto Rico [1]

Commercial multi-family

$ 2,151 $ 4,689 $ 4,506 $ $ $ 11,346 $ 50,160 $ 61,506

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

156,672 136,028 181,440 474,140 1,475,742 1,949,882

Commercial real estate owner occupied

287,713 116,570 313,161 272 717,716 827,868 1,545,584

Commercial and industrial

415,988 330,675 275,512 152 297 1,022,624 1,719,384 2,742,008

Total Commercial

862,524 587,962 774,619 424 297 2,225,826 4,073,154 6,298,980

Construction

6,472 3,722 23,911 34,105 101,578 135,683

Mortgage

213,278 213,278 5,245,294 5,458,572

Leasing

2,870 3 2,873 543,995 546,868

Consumer:

Credit cards

20,511 20,511 1,135,374 1,155,885

HELOCs

922 2,590 3,512 10,769 14,281

Personal

7,862 126 7,988 1,278,917 1,286,905

Auto

11,393 310 11,703 733,606 745,309

Other

2,424 1,474 3,898 209,571 213,469

Total Consumer

43,112 4,500 47,612 3,368,237 3,415,849

Total Puerto Rico

$ 868,996 $ 591,684 $ 1,057,790 $ 424 $ 4,800 $ 2,523,694 $ 13,332,258 $ 15,855,952

U.S. mainland [2]

Commercial multi-family

$ 33,289 $ 2,789 $ 20,214 $ $ $ 56,292 $ 358,028 $ 414,320

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

18,326 10,337 76,039 104,702 446,452 551,154

Commercial real estate owner occupied

30,249 3,889 27,689 61,827 151,124 212,951

Commercial and industrial

9,633 3,510 26,642 39,785 638,357 678,142

Total Commercial

91,497 20,525 150,584 262,606 1,593,961 1,856,567

Construction

43,376 43,376

Mortgage

23,964 23,964 1,181,912 1,205,876

Legacy

14,659 8,432 31,640 54,731 108,210 162,941

Consumer:

59


Table of Contents

Credit cards

378 378 14,919 15,297

HELOCs

2,151 5,070 7,221 367,165 374,386

Personal

761 693 1,454 118,561 120,015

Auto

270 270

Other

3 3 541 544

Total Consumer

3,293 5,763 9,056 501,456 510,512

Total U.S. mainland

$ 106,156 $ 28,957 $ 209,481 $ $ 5,763 $ 350,357 $ 3,428,915 $ 3,779,272

Popular, Inc.

Commercial multi-family

$ 35,440 $ 7,478 $ 24,720 $ $ $ 67,638 $ 408,188 $ 475,826

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

174,998 146,365 257,479 578,842 1,922,194 2,501,036

Commercial real estate owner occupied

317,962 120,459 340,850 272 779,543 978,992 1,758,535

Commercial and industrial

425,621 334,185 302,154 152 297 1,062,409 2,357,741 3,420,150

Total Commercial

954,021 608,487 925,203 424 297 2,488,432 5,667,115 8,155,547

Construction

6,472 3,722 23,911 34,105 144,954 179,059

Mortgage

237,242 237,242 6,427,206 6,664,448

Legacy

14,659 8,432 31,640 54,731 108,210 162,941

Leasing

2,870 3 2,873 543,995 546,868

Consumer:

Credit cards

20,889 20,889 1,150,293 1,171,182

HELOCs

3,073 7,660 10,733 377,934 388,667

Personal

8,623 819 9,442 1,397,478 1,406,920

Auto

11,393 310 11,703 733,876 745,579

Other

2,427 1,474 3,901 210,112 214,013

Total Consumer

46,405 10,263 56,668 3,869,693 3,926,361

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 975,152 $ 620,641 $ 1,267,271 $ 424 $ 10,563 $ 2,874,051 $ 16,761,173 $ 19,635,224

The following table presents the weighted average obligor risk rating at June 30, 2014 for those classifications that consider a range of rating scales.

(Scales 11 and 12) (Scales 1 through 8)
Substandard Pass

Weighted average obligor risk rating

Puerto Rico: [1]

Commercial multi-family

11.63 5.73

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

11.31 6.74

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11.33 6.84

Commercial and industrial

11.32 6.61

Total Commercial

11.32 6.70

Construction

11.90 7.87

Substandard Pass

U.S. mainland: [2]

Commercial multi-family

11.20 7.14

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

11.16 6.77

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11.15 6.82

Commercial and industrial

11.14 6.45

Total Commercial

11.16 6.73

Construction

7.65

Legacy

11.19 7.74

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.
[2] Excludes discontinued operations.

December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Watch Special
Mention
Substandard Doubtful Loss Sub-total Pass/ Unrated Total

Puerto Rico [1]

Commercial multi-family

$ 2,477 $ 4,453 $ 2,343 $ $ $ 9,273 $ 73,130 $ 82,403

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

230,847 156,189 115,435 112 502,583 1,361,635 1,864,218

Commercial real estate owner occupied

231,705 134,577 305,565 671,847 934,656 1,606,503

Commercial and industrial

727,647 192,404 214,531 68 446 1,135,096 1,777,370 2,912,466

Total Commercial

1,192,676 487,623 637,874 68 558 2,318,799 4,146,791 6,465,590

Construction

6,895 1,788 25,722 2,250 36,655 124,516 161,171

Mortgage

169,239 169,239 5,231,440 5,400,679

Leasing

3,495 3,495 540,266 543,761

60


Table of Contents

Consumer:

Credit cards

21,044 21,044 1,148,577 1,169,621

HELOCs

665 2,426 3,091 12,087 15,178

Personal

7,483 141 7,624 1,206,260 1,213,884

Auto

10,407 155 10,562 688,929 699,491

Other

2,019 3,531 5,550 212,914 218,464

Total Consumer

41,618 6,253 47,871 3,268,767 3,316,638

Total Puerto Rico

$ 1,199,571 $ 489,411 $ 877,948 $ 2,318 $ 6,811 $ 2,576,059 $ 13,311,780 $ 15,887,839

U.S. mainland

Commercial multi-family

$ 73,481 $ 11,459 $ 62,346 $ $ $ 147,286 $ 946,248 $ 1,093,534

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

75,094 29,442 160,001 264,537 841,750 1,106,287

Commercial real estate owner occupied

56,515 15,845 75,508 147,868 412,174 560,042

Commercial and industrial

11,657 11,822 46,307 69,786 741,945 811,731

Total Commercial

216,747 68,568 344,162 629,477 2,942,117 3,571,594

Construction

20,885 20,885 24,028 44,913

Mortgage

26,292 26,292 1,254,505 1,280,797

Legacy

14,948 11,593 42,622 69,163 141,972 211,135

Consumer:

Credit cards

486 486 15,165 15,651

HELOCs

3,317 5,315 8,632 454,401 463,033

Personal

1,005 569 1,574 133,661 135,235

Auto

2 2 487 489

Other

20 1 21 1,159 1,180

Total Consumer

4,828 5,887 10,715 604,873 615,588

Total U.S. mainland

$ 231,695 $ 80,161 $ 438,789 $ $ 5,887 $ 756,532 $ 4,967,495 $ 5,724,027

Popular, Inc.

Commercial multi-family

$ 75,958 $ 15,912 $ 64,689 $ $ $ 156,559 $ 1,019,378 $ 1,175,937

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

305,941 185,631 275,436 112 767,120 2,203,385 2,970,505

Commercial real estate owner occupied

288,220 150,422 381,073 819,715 1,346,830 2,166,545

Commercial and industrial

739,304 204,226 260,838 68 446 1,204,882 2,519,315 3,724,197

Total Commercial

1,409,423 556,191 982,036 68 558 2,948,276 7,088,908 10,037,184

Construction

6,895 1,788 46,607 2,250 57,540 148,544 206,084

Mortgage

195,531 195,531 6,485,945 6,681,476

Legacy

14,948 11,593 42,622 69,163 141,972 211,135

Leasing

3,495 3,495 540,266 543,761

Consumer:

Credit cards

21,530 21,530 1,163,742 1,185,272

HELOCs

3,982 7,741 11,723 466,488 478,211

Personal

8,488 710 9,198 1,339,921 1,349,119

Auto

10,407 157 10,564 689,416 699,980

Other

2,039 3,532 5,571 214,073 219,644

Total Consumer

46,446 12,140 58,586 3,873,640 3,932,226

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 1,431,266 $ 569,572 $ 1,316,737 $ 2,318 $ 12,698 $ 3,332,591 $ 18,279,275 $ 21,611,866

The following table presents the weighted average obligor risk rating at December 31, 2013 for those classifications that consider a range of rating scales.

(Scales 11 and 12) (Scales 1 through 8)
Substandard Pass

Weighted average obligor risk rating

Puerto Rico: [1]

Commercial multi-family

11.33 5.31

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

11.38 6.73

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11.31 6.89

Commercial and industrial

11.34 6.63

Total Commercial

11.33 6.71

Construction

11.63 7.86

Substandard Pass

U.S. mainland:

Commercial multi-family

11.34 7.08

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

11.27 6.89

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11.31 7.04

Commercial and industrial

11.09 6.53

Total Commercial

11.27 6.89

Construction

11.27 7.64

Legacy

11.24 7.72

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

61


Table of Contents

Note 11 – FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation

In connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC with respect to the covered loans and other real estate owned. Pursuant to the terms of the loss share agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC reimburses BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR reimburses the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid 80% reimbursement under loss share agreements. The loss share agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss and recoveries sharing for ten years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2020. The loss share agreement applicable to commercial (including construction) and consumer loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2015 and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for eight years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2018, in each case, on the same terms and conditions as described above.

The following table sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss share asset for the periods presented.

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 833,721 $ 1,380,592 $ 948,608 $ 1,399,098

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

(72,095 ) (38,557 ) (121,041 ) (78,761 )

Credit impairment losses to be covered under loss sharing agreements

10,372 25,338 25,462 39,383

Decrease due to reciprocal accounting on amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments

(193 ) (386 )

Reimbursable expenses

11,085 12,131 23,830 19,914

Payments to (from) FDIC under loss sharing agreements

(31,530 ) (112,857 ) 107

Other adjustments attributable to FDIC loss sharing agreements

31 (12,449 ) (13 )

Balance at end of period

$ 751,553 $ 1,379,342 $ 751,553 $ 1,379,342

During the second quarter, the Corporation revised its analysis of expected cash flows which resulted in a net decrease of approximately $102.9 million in estimated credit losses, which was driven mainly by certain commercial loan pools. Though this will have a positive impact on the Corporation’s interest accretion in future periods, the carrying value of the indemnification asset was amortized to reflect lower levels of expected losses. This amortization is recognized over the shorter of the remaining life of the loan pools, which had an average life of approximately six years, or the indemnification asset, which as of June 30, 2014 is one year for commercial, construction and consumer loans and of six years for single-family residential mortgage loans.

The following table presents the weighted average life of the loan portfolios subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreement for the at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Weighted Average Life
June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Commercial

5.78 years 6.43 years

Consumer

3.16 3.13

Construction

1.35 1.30

Mortgage

6.87 6.91

As part of the loss share agreements, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day (such day, the “true-up measurement date”) of the final shared-loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss share agreements, in the event losses on the loss share agreements fail to reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true-up payment obligation is recorded as contingent consideration, which is included in the caption of other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Under the loss sharing agreements, BPPR will pay to the FDIC 50% of the excess, if any, of: (i) 20% of the intrinsic loss estimate of $4.6 billion (or $925 million) (as determined by the FDIC) less (ii) the sum of: (A) 25% of the asset discount (per bid) (or ($1.1 billion)); plus (B) 25% of the cumulative shared-loss payments (defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to BPPR minus the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC); plus (C) the sum of the period servicing amounts for every consecutive twelve-month period prior to and

62


Table of Contents

ending on the true-up measurement date in respect of each of the loss sharing agreements during which the loss sharing provisions of the applicable loss sharing agreement is in effect (defined as the product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared loss loans and shared loss assets at the beginning and end of such period times 1%).

The following table provides the fair value and the undiscounted amount of the true-up payment obligation at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Carrying amount (fair value)

$ 127,551 $ 127,513

Undiscounted amount

$ 192,738 $ 185,372

The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow in order to receive reimbursement on losses from the FDIC. Under the loss share agreements, BPPR must:

manage and administer the covered assets and collect and effect charge-offs and recoveries with respect to such covered assets in a manner consistent with its usual and prudent business and banking practices and, with respect to single family shared-loss loans, the procedures (including collection procedures) customarily employed by BPPR in servicing and administering mortgage loans for its own account and the servicing procedures established by FNMA or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), as in effect from time to time, and in accordance with accepted mortgage servicing practices of prudent lending institutions;

exercise its best judgment in managing, administering and collecting amounts on covered assets and effecting charge-offs with respect to the covered assets;

use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize recoveries with respect to losses on single family shared-loss assets and best efforts to maximize collections with respect to commercial shared-loss assets;

retain sufficient staff to perform the duties under the loss share agreements;

adopt and implement accounting, reporting, record-keeping and similar systems with respect to the commercial shared-loss assets;

comply with the terms of the modification guidelines approved by the FDIC or another federal agency for any single-family shared-loss loan;

provide notice with respect to proposed transactions pursuant to which a third party or affiliate will manage, administer or collect any commercial shared-loss assets;

file monthly and quarterly certificates with the FDIC specifying the amount of losses, charge-offs and recoveries; and

maintain books and records sufficient to ensure and document compliance with the terms of the loss share agreements.

Refer to Note 24, Commitment and Contingencies, for additional information on the arbitration proceedings with the FDIC regarding the commercial loss share agreement.

63


Table of Contents

Note 12 – Mortgage banking activities

Income from mortgage banking activities includes mortgage servicing fees earned in connection with administering residential mortgage loans and valuation adjustments on mortgage servicing rights. It also includes gain on sales and securitizations of residential mortgage loans and trading gains and losses on derivative contracts used to hedge the Corporation’s securitization activities. In addition, lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments to residential mortgage loans held for sale, if any, are recorded as part of the mortgage banking activities.

The following table presents the components of mortgage banking activities:

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments:

Mortgage servicing fees

$ 10,558 $ 11,313 $ 21,306 $ 22,556

Mortgage servicing rights fair value adjustments

(7,740 ) (5,126 ) (15,836 ) (10,741 )

Total mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments

2,818 6,187 5,470 11,815

Net gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation on loans held-for-sale

8,189 (351 ) 15,365 13,409

Trading account (loss) profit:

Unrealized gains (losses) on outstanding derivative positions

22 622 (738 ) 600

Realized (losses) gains on closed derivative positions

(7,241 ) 11,623 (12,631 ) 12,554

Total trading account (loss) profit

(7,219 ) 12,245 (13,369 ) 13,154

Total mortgage banking activities

$ 3,788 $ 18,081 $ 7,466 $ 38,378

64


Table of Contents

Note 13 – Transfers of financial assets and mortgage servicing assets

The Corporation typically transfers conforming residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities and servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the corresponding agency and, as such, under seller/service agreements the Corporation is required to service the loans in accordance with the agencies’ servicing guidelines and standards. Substantially all mortgage loans securitized by the Corporation in GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC securities have fixed rates and represent conforming loans. As seller, the Corporation has made certain representations and warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and, in some instances, has sold loans with credit recourse to a government-sponsored entity, namely FNMA. Refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of such arrangements.

No liabilities were incurred as a result of these securitizations during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 because they did not contain any credit recourse arrangements. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded a net gain $9.2 million (June 30, 2013 - $8.8 million) related to the residential mortgage loans securitized. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded a net gain $17.0 million (June 30, 2013 - $26.5 million) related to the residential mortgage loans securitized.

The following tables present the initial fair value of the assets obtained as proceeds from residential mortgage loans securitized during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Initial Fair Value

Assets

Trading account securities:

Mortgage-backed securities—GNMA

$ $ 184,307 $ $ 184,307

Mortgage-backed securities—FNMA

60,069 60,069

Total trading account securities

$ $ 244,376 $ $ 244,376

Mortgage servicing rights

2,919 2,919

Total

$ $ 244,376 $ 2,919 $ 247,295

Proceeds Obtained During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Initial Fair Value

Assets

Trading account securities:

Mortgage-backed securities—GNMA

$ $ 350,239 $ $ 350,239

Mortgage-backed securities—FNMA

122,652 122,652

Total trading account securities

$ $ 472,891 $ $ 472,891

Mortgage servicing rights

6,117 6,117

Total

$ $ 472,891 $ 6,117 $ 479,008

Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Initial Fair Value

Assets

Trading account securities:

Mortgage-backed securities—GNMA

$ $ 282,317 $ $ 282,317

Mortgage-backed securities—FNMA

123,924 123,924

Mortgage-backed securities—FHLMC

26,692 26,692

Total trading account securities

$ $ 432,933 $ $ 432,933

Mortgage servicing rights

4,637 4,637

Total

$ $ 432,933 $ 4,637 $ 437,570

65


Table of Contents
Proceeds Obtained During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Initial Fair Value

Assets

Trading account securities:

Mortgage-backed securities—GNMA

$ $ 567,569 $ $ 567,569

Mortgage-backed securities—FNMA

252,066 252,066

Mortgage-backed securities—FHLMC

26,692 26,692

Total trading account securities

$ $ 846,327 $ $ 846,327

Mortgage servicing rights

9,380 9,380

Total

$ $ 846,327 $ 9,380 $ 855,707

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation retained servicing rights on whole loan sales involving approximately $53 million in principal balance outstanding (June 30, 2013 - $40 million), with realized gains of approximately $2.0 million (June 30, 2013 - gains of $1.5 million). All loan sales performed during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were without credit recourse agreements.

The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations. These mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are measured at fair value.

The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior.

The following table presents the changes in MSRs measured using the fair value method for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Residential MSRs

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Fair value at beginning of period

$ 161,099 $ 154,430

Purchases

45

Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers

6,692 10,152

Changes due to payments on loans [1]

(8,164 ) (12,721 )

Reduction due to loan repurchases

(1,830 ) (2,033 )

Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions

(5,842 ) 4,013

Other disposals

(4 ) (442 )

Fair value at end of period

$ 151,951 $ 153,444

[1] Represents the change due to collection / realization of expected cash flow over time.

Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $16.1 billion at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $16.3 billion).

Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statements of operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, including changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value adjustments, for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 amounted to $10.6 million and $21.3 million, respectively (June 30, 2013 - $11.3 million and $22.6 million, respectively). The banking subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding loan balance. At June 30, 2014, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.26% (June 30, 2013 – 0.27%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not generally earn significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.

66


Table of Contents

The section below includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the MSRs, originated and purchased.

Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights derived from loans securitized or sold by the Corporation during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

Quarter ended Six months ended
June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Prepayment speed

6.3 % 7.3 % 6.2 % 7.7 %

Weighted average life

15.9 years 13.7 years 16.0 years 12.9 years

Discount rate (annual rate)

10.7 % 11.1 % 10.7 % 11.1 %

Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions were as follows as of the end of the periods reported:

Originated MSRs

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Fair value of servicing rights

$ 110,977 $ 115,753

Weighted average life

12.5 years 12.5 years

Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate)

8.0 % 8.0 %

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$ (1,703 ) $ (3,763 )

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

$ (5,363 ) $ (7,459 )

Weighted average discount rate (annual rate)

11.6 % 11.6 %

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$ (2,674 ) $ (4,930 )

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

$ (7,136 ) $ (9,595 )

The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions were as follows as of the end of the periods reported:

Purchased MSRs

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Fair value of servicing rights

$ 40,975 $ 45,346

Weighted average life

10.8 years 10.9 years

Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate)

8.9 % 9.2 %

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$ (1,030 ) $ (1,969 )

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

$ (2,421 ) $ (3,478 )

Weighted average discount rate (annual rate)

10.8 % 10.8 %

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$ (1,087 ) $ (2,073 )

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

$ (2,511 ) $ (3,655 )

The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

67


Table of Contents

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation serviced $2.3 billion (December 31, 2013 - $2.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the Corporation.

Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation, as servicer, has the right to repurchase (but not the obligation), at its option and without GNMA’s prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual loans meet GNMA’s specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans if the Corporation was the pool issuer. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation had recorded $34 million in mortgage loans on its consolidated statements of financial condition related to this buy-back option program (December 31, 2013 - $48 million). As long as the Corporation continues to service the loans that continue to be collateral in a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security, the MSR is recognized by the Corporation. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation repurchased approximately $ 107 million (year ended December 31, 2013 - $209 million) of mortgage loans under the GNMA buy-back option program. The determination to repurchase these loans was based on the economic benefits of the transaction, which results in a reduction of the servicing costs for these severely delinquent loans, mostly related to principal and interest advances. Furthermore, due to their guaranteed nature, the risk associated with the loans is minimal. The Corporation places these loans under its loss mitigation programs and once brought back to current status, these may be either retained in portfolio or re-sold in the secondary market.

68


Table of Contents

Note 14 – Other real estate owned

The following tables present the Other Real Estate Owned Activity, for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014
Non-covered Non-covered Covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/Construction Mortgage Commercial/Construction Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 48,141 $ 88,824 $ 110,333 $ 48,414 $ 295,712

Write-downs in value

(571 ) (439 ) (6,635 ) (940 ) (8,585 )

Additions

6,303 15,400 22,260 4,103 48,066

Sales

(5,372 ) (12,203 ) (14,792 ) (3,777 ) (36,144 )

Other adjustments

1,286 (1,949 ) (3,261 ) 100 (3,824 )

Ending balance

$ 49,787 $ 89,633 $ 107,905 $ 47,900 $ 295,225

For the six months ended June 30, 2014
Non-covered Non-covered Covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/Construction Mortgage Commercial/Construction Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 48,649 $ 86,852 $ 120,215 $ 47,792 $ 303,508

Write-downs in value

(785 ) (1,108 ) (11,198 ) (1,147 ) (14,238 )

Additions

10,971 30,283 35,454 8,594 85,302

Sales

(10,334 ) (24,266 ) (33,213 ) (6,154 ) (73,967 )

Other adjustments

1,286 (2,128 ) (3,353 ) (1,185 ) (5,380 )

Ending balance

$ 49,787 $ 89,633 $ 107,905 $ 47,900 $ 295,225

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013
Non-covered Non-covered Covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/Construction Mortgage Commercial/Construction Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 79,146 $ 75,553 $ 129,413 $ 42,965 $ 327,077

Write-downs in value

(987 ) (462 ) (3,568 ) (1,482 ) (6,499 )

Additions

3,940 30,337 16,879 8,064 59,220

Sales

(17,264 ) (13,154 ) (3,839 ) (5,208 ) (39,465 )

Other adjustments

290 1,521 1 1,812

Ending balance

$ 65,125 $ 93,795 $ 138,885 $ 44,340 $ 342,145

For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Non-covered Non-covered Covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/Construction Mortgage Commercial/Construction Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 135,862 $ 130,982 $ 99,398 $ 39,660 $ 405,902

Write-downs in value

(5,886 ) (7,820 ) (6,673 ) (1,785 ) (22,164 )

Additions

22,258 55,185 51,674 17,037 146,154

Sales

(87,399 ) (85,171 ) (5,514 ) (10,464 ) (188,548 )

Other adjustments

290 619 (108 ) 801

Ending balance

$ 65,125 $ 93,795 $ 138,885 $ 44,340 $ 342,145

69


Table of Contents

Note 15 – Other assets

The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition consists of the following major categories:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance)

$ 788,732 $ 761,768

Investments under the equity method

214,452 197,006

Bank-owned life insurance program

230,570 228,805

Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment

379 383

Prepaid taxes

210,079 91,504

Other prepaid expenses

73,886 67,108

Derivative assets

27,559 34,710

Trades receivable from brokers and counterparties

519,495 71,680

Others

227,208 234,594

Total other assets

$ 2,292,360 $ 1,687,558

Other assets from discontinued operations are presented as part of “Assets from Discontinued Operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Condition. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the discontinued operations.

On February 1, 2014, Centro Financiero BHD (“BHD”), the Corporation’s equity method investee based in the Dominican Republic, completed a merger transaction in which it acquired the net assets of Centro Financiero León. Centro Financiero León was the holding company of Banco León, the fourth largest bank in terms of assets in the Dominican Republic. In connection with the transaction, BHD issued additional shares which diluted the Corporation’s equity participation from 19.99% to 15.79%. As a result of this transaction, the Corporation recognized a net gain of $14.2 million during the first quarter of 2014, due to BHD’s increase in net assets. The gain was partially offset by approximately $7.7 million resulting from the reclassification from other comprehensive income into earnings of the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment due to the reduction in the Corporation’s ownership percentage. As of June 30, 2014, the Corporation had a 15.82% equity participation and continues to have significant influence over BHD. Accordingly, the investment in BHD is accounted for under the equity method and is evaluated for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has occurred that is other than temporary.

Other assets as of June 30, 2014 includes $441 million of trades receivable related to the issuance of $450 million in Senior Notes, which settled on July 1, 2014, net of debt issuance costs of $9 million.

70


Table of Contents

Note 16 – Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, allocated by reportable segments, were as follows (refer to Note 36 for the definition of the Corporation’s reportable segments):

2014

(In thousands)

Balance at
January 1, 2014
Goodwill on
acquisition
Purchase
accounting
adjustments
Goodwill
written off
related to
discontinued
operations
Other Balance at
June 30, 2014

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

$ 245,679 $ $ $ $ $ 245,679

Banco Popular North America

402,078 (186,511 ) 215,567

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 647,757 $ $ $ (186,511 ) $ $ 461,246

2013

(In thousands)

Balance at
January 1, 2013
Goodwill on
acquisition
Purchase
accounting
adjustments
Other Balance at
June 30, 2013

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

$ 245,679 $ $ $ $ 245,679

Banco Popular North America

402,078 402,078

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 647,757 $ $ $ $ 647,757

Goodwill Impairment Test

As discussed in Note 3, Discontinued Operations, on April 22, 2014, BPNA entered into definitive agreements to sell its regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida to three different buyers. In connection with the transactions, the Corporation intends to centralize certain back office operations in Puerto Rico and New York. During the second quarter of 2014, the assets and liabilities for these regions subject to the sales were reclassified as held-for-sale in accordance with ASC 360-10-45. As a result of the reclassification of these discontinued operations to held-for-sale, and in accordance with ASC 350-20-40, BPNA allocated a proportionate share of the goodwill balance to these discontinued businesses based on a relative fair value basis and performed an impairment test for the goodwill allocated to each of the discontinued operations as well as for the goodwill allocated to the retained business, each as a separate reporting unit. This allocation of goodwill and related impairment analysis resulted in an impairment charge of $186.5 million during the second quarter of 2014. The goodwill impairment charge is a non-cash charge that did not have an impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios. The goodwill impairment analysis of the retained portion of the BPNA operations resulted in no impairment as of June 30, 2014.

The methodology used to determine the relative value of the regions sold and the retained portion of the BPNA reporting unit for purpose of the goodwill allocation among these reporting units takes into consideration the fair value estimates resulting from a combination of: (1) the average price to tangible book multiple based on a regression analysis of the projected return on equity for comparable companies, (2) the average price to revenue multiple based on a regression analysis of the projected revenue margin for comparable companies, and (3) the average price to earnings multiple based on comparable companies. After allocating the carrying amount of goodwill to the regions sold and the retained portion, the Corporation performed the goodwill impairment test of ASC 350-20 to each region sold and to the retained business reporting unit. The fair value of each region was based on the transaction price agreed with the buyers as part of the step 2 of the goodwill impairment analysis. This fair value was compared to the fair value of the assets and liabilities sold including any unrecognized intangible asset. The goodwill impairment analysis of the regions sold indicated that all the goodwill allocated to each region sold was impaired, and accordingly, the Corporation recorded an impairment charge of $186.5 million during the second quarter of 2014.

71


Table of Contents

For the ASC 350-20 goodwill impairment test of the remaining portion of the BPNA reporting unit, the Corporation performed an analysis similar to the annual impairment test performed during the third quarter of 2013. For the two-step test, the Corporation used a combination of methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as discounted cash flows analysis. The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these evaluations include:

a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business, location and size;

a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions;

the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of equity;

the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and

the market growth and new business assumptions.

For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of judgment.

For purposes of the discounted cash flows (“DCF”) approach, the valuation is based on estimated future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for the reporting unit are based on the most recent (as of the valuation date) financial projections presented to the Corporation’s Asset / Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”).

The average estimated fair value calculated in Step 1 using all valuation methodologies exceeded BPNA reporting unit’s equity value by approximately $197 million. This result indicates there would be no indication of impairment on the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the remaining portion. Accordingly, Step 2 was not required to be performed.

The following table presents the gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses by reportable segments.

June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Balance at
January 1,
2014
(gross amounts)
Accumulated
impairment
losses
Balance at
January 1,
2014
(net amounts)
Balance at
June 30,
2014
(gross amounts)
Accumulated
impairment
losses
Balance at
June 30,
2014
(net amounts)

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

$ 245,679 $ $ 245,679 $ 245,679 $ $ 245,679

Banco Popular North America

566,489 164,411 402,078 379,978 164,411 215,567

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 812,168 $ 164,411 $ 647,757 $ 625,657 $ 164,411 $ 461,246

December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Balance at
January 1,
2013
(gross amounts)
Accumulated
impairment
losses
Balance at
January 1,
2013
(net amounts)
Balance at
December 31,
2013
(gross amounts)
Accumulated
impairment
losses
Balance at
December 31,
2013
(net amounts)

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

$ 245,679 $ $ 245,679 $ 245,679 $ $ 245,679

Banco Popular North America

566,489 164,411 402,078 566,489 164,411 402,078

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 812,168 $ 164,411 $ 647,757 $ 812,168 $ 164,411 $ 647,757

72


Table of Contents

Other Intangible Assets

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation had $ 6 million of identifiable intangible assets, with indefinite useful lives, mostly associated with E-LOAN’s trademark.

The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:

(In thousands)

Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Value

June 30, 2014

Core deposits

$ 77,885 $ 55,793 $ 22,092

Other customer relationships

17,552 5,647 11,905

Other intangibles

135 124 11

Total other intangible assets

$ 95,572 $ 61,564 $ 34,008

December 31, 2013

Core deposits

$ 77,885 $ 51,737 $ 26,148

Other customer relationships

17,555 4,712 12,843

Other intangibles

135 107 28

Total other intangible assets

$ 95,575 $ 56,556 $ 39,019

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recognized $ 2.0 million in amortization expense related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (June 30, 2013 - $ 2.0 million). During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recognized $ 4.1 million in amortization related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (June 30, 2013 - $ 4.0 million).

The following table presents the estimated amortization of the intangible assets with definite useful lives for each of the following periods:

(In thousands)

Remaining 2014

$ 4,364

Year 2015

7,227

Year 2016

6,942

Year 2017

4,194

Year 2018

4,101

Year 2019

3,969

73


Table of Contents

Note 17 – Deposits

Total interest bearing deposits as of the end of the periods presented consisted of:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Savings accounts

$ 7,536,527 $ 6,839,126

NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits

4,029,167 5,637,985

Total savings, NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits

11,565,694 12,477,111

Certificates of deposit:

Under $100,000

4,651,190 5,101,711

$100,000 and over

3,017,583 3,209,641

Total certificates of deposit

7,668,773 8,311,352

Total interest bearing deposits

$ 19,234,467 $ 20,788,463

Deposits from discontinued operations are presented as part of “Liabilities from Discontinued Operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Condition. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the discontinued operations.

A summary of certificates of deposit by maturity at June 30, 2014 follows:

(In thousands)

2014

$ 3,892,291

2015

1,671,312

2016

753,965

2017

563,469

2018

399,040

2019 and thereafter

388,696

Total certificates of deposit

$ 7,668,773

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation had brokered deposits amounting to $ 2.4 billion (December 31, 2013 - $ 2.4 billion).

The aggregate amount of overdrafts in demand deposit accounts that were reclassified to loans was $9 million at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $10 million).

74


Table of Contents

Note 18 – Borrowings

The following table presents the composition of federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Federal funds purchased

$ 250,000 $

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

1,824,676 1,659,292

Total federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 2,074,676 $ 1,659,292

The repurchase agreements outstanding at June 30, 2014 were collateralized by $ 1.5 billion (December 31, 2013 - $ 1.3 billion) in investment securities available-for-sale, $ 256 million (December 31, 2013 - $ 309 million) in trading securities and $ 76 million (December 31, 2013 - $ 70 million) in securities sold not yet delivered in other assets. It is the Corporation’s policy to maintain effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

In addition, there were repurchase agreements outstanding collateralized by $ 203 million in securities purchased under agreements to resell to which the Corporation has the right to repledge the securities (December 31, 2013 - $ 189 million). It is the Corporation’s policy to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. However, the counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control over such securities; accordingly, these securities are not reflected in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition.

The following table presents the composition of other short-term borrowings at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Advances with the FHLB paying interest at maturity, at a fixed rate of 0.42%

$ 30,000 $ 400,000

Others

1,200 1,200

Total other short-term borrowings

$ 31,200 $ 401,200

Note: Refer to the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Report for rates information at December 31, 2013.

75


Table of Contents

The following table presents the composition of notes payable at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Advances with the FHLB with maturities ranging from 2014 through 2021 paying interest at monthly fixed rates ranging from 0.27% to 4.19 %

$ 510,514 $ 589,229

Unsecured senior debt securities maturing on 2019 paying interest semiannually at a fixed rate of 7.00%

450,000

Term notes maturing on 2014 paying interest semiannually at a fixed rate of 7.47%

675 675

Term notes maturing on 2014 paying interest monthly at a floating rate of 3.00% over the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate [1]

7 14

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities) with maturities ranging from 2027 to 2034 with fixed interest rates ranging from 6.125% to 8.327% (Refer to Note 20)

439,800 439,800

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities) ($936,000 less discount of $404,460 at December 31, 2013), with no stated maturity and a fixed interest rate of 5.00% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9.00% thereafter (Refer to Note 20) [2]

936,000 531,540

Others

23,093 23,496

Total notes payable

$ 2,360,089 $ 1,584,754

Note: Refer to the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Report for rates information at December 31, 2013.

[1] The 10-year U.S. Treasury note key index rate at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was 2.53% and 3.03%, respectively.
[2] The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by the Corporation at any time, subject to the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The discount on the debentures was being amortized over an estimated 30-year term that started in August 2009. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, in connection with the repayment of these Notes completed on July 2, 2014, the Corporation accelerated the related amortization of the discount and deferred costs amounting to $414.1 million, which is reflected as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. The effective interest rate, including the discount accretion, was approximately 16% at December 31, 2013.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation received approval from the Federal Reserve System to repay the $935 million in TARP Capital Purchase Program funds. On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of these funds, which were partially funded with $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019, which settled on July 1, 2014. Accordingly, during the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation accelerated the related amortization of $414.1 million of discount and deferred costs, which is reflected as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Refer to additional information on Note 20, Trust Preferred Securities and Note 37, Subsequent Events.

76


Table of Contents

A breakdown of borrowings by contractual maturities at June 30, 2014 is included in the table below.

(In thousands)

Fed funds purchased
and assets sold under
agreements to repurchase
Short-term
borrowings
Notes payable Total

Year

2014

$ 1,332,479 $ 31,200 $ 16,905 $ 1,380,584

2015

174,135 29,040 203,175

2016

453,062 247,105 700,167

2017

115,000 79,033 194,033

2018

107,296 107,296

Later years

944,710 944,710

No stated maturity

936,000 936,000

Total borrowings

$ 2,074,676 $ 31,200 $ 2,360,089 $ 4,465,965

77


Table of Contents

Note 19 – Offsetting of financial assets and liabilities

The following tables present the potential effect of rights of setoff associated with the Corporation’s recognized financial assets and liabilities at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

As of June 30, 2014

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position

(In thousands)

Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets
Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Net Amounts of
Assets
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Securities
Collateral
Received
Cash
Collateral
Received
Net Amount

Derivatives

$ 27,585 $ $ 27,585 $ 541 $ $ $ 27,044

Reverse repurchase agreements

192,490 192,490 192,490

Total

$ 220,075 $ $ 220,075 $ 541 $ 192,490 $ $ 27,044

As of June 30, 2014

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial
Position

(In thousands)

Gross Amount
of Recognized
Liabilities
Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Net Amounts of
Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Securities
Collateral
Pledged
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
Net Amount

Derivatives

$ 25,611 $ $ 25,611 $ 541 $ 11,627 $ $ 13,443

Repurchase agreements

1,824,676 1,824,676 1,824,676

Total

$ 1,850,287 $ $ 1,850,287 $ 541 $ 1,836,303 $ $ 13,443

As of December 31, 2013

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position

(In thousands)

Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets
Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Net Amounts of
Assets
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Securities
Collateral
Received
Cash
Collateral
Received
Net Amount

Derivatives

$ 34,793 $ $ 34,793 $ 1,220 $ $ $ 33,573

Reverse repurchase agreements

175,965 175,965 175,965

Total

$ 210,758 $ $ 210,758 $ 1,220 $ 175,965 $ $ 33,573

78


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2013

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position

(In thousands)

Gross Amount
of Recognized
Liabilities
Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Net Amounts of
Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Securities
Collateral
Pledged
Cash
Collateral
Received
Net Amount

Derivatives

$ 32,378 $ $ 32,378 $ 1,220 $ 14,003 $ $ 17,155

Repurchase agreements

1,659,292 1,659,292 1,659,292

Total

$ 1,691,670 $ $ 1,691,670 $ 1,220 $ 1,673,295 $ $ 17,155

The Corporation’s derivatives are subject to agreements which allow a right of set-off with each respective counterparty. In addition, the Corporation’s Repurchase Agreements and Reverse Repurchase Agreements have a right of set-off with the respective counterparty under the supplemental terms of the Master Repurchase Agreements. In an event of default each party has a right of set-off against the other party for amounts owed in the related agreement and any other amount or obligation owed in respect of any other agreement or transaction between them.

79


Table of Contents

Note 20 – Trust preferred securities

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, four statutory trusts established by the Corporation (BanPonce Trust I, Popular Capital Trust I, Popular North America Capital Trust I and Popular Capital Trust II) had issued trust preferred securities (also referred to as “capital securities”) to the public. The proceeds from such issuances, together with the proceeds of the related issuances of common securities of the trusts (the “common securities”), were used by the trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the “junior subordinated debentures”) issued by the Corporation. In August 2009, the Corporation established the Popular Capital Trust III for the purpose of exchanging the shares of Series C preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury at the time for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. In connection with this exchange, the trust used the Series C preferred stock, together with the proceeds of issuance and sale of common securities of the trust, to purchase junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation.

The sole assets of the five trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the Corporation and the related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the Corporation pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the consolidated statements of financial condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer trusts are included as other investment securities. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation.

The following table presents financial data pertaining to the different trusts at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(Dollars in thousands)

Issuer

BanPonce Trust I Popular
Capital Trust I
Popular
North America
Capital Trust I
Popular
Capital Trust II
Popular
Capital Trust III

Capital securities

$ 52,865 $ 181,063 $ 91,651 $ 101,023 $ 935,000

Distribution rate

8.327 % 6.700 % 6.564 % 6.125 %




5.000% until,
but excluding
December 5,
2013 and
9.000%
thereafter





Common securities

$ 1,637 $ 5,601 $ 2,835 $ 3,125 $ 1,000

Junior subordinated debentures aggregate liquidation amount

$ 54,502 $ 186,664 $ 94,486 $ 104,148 $ 936,000

Stated maturity date

February 2027 November 2033 September 2034 December 2034 Perpetual

Reference notes

[1],[3],[6] [2],[4],[5] [1],[3],[5] [2],[4],[5] [2],[4],[7],[8]

[1] Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America and indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation.
[2] Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation.
[3] The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the capital securities under the trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement.
[4] These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement.
[5] The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal Reserve, to redeem after certain dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below, the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the junior subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated maturity dates (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of a tax event, an investment company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval.
[6] Same as [5] above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early redemption.
[7] The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
[8] Carrying value of junior subordinated debentures of $ 936 million at June 30, 2014 and $ 532 million at December 31, 2013 ($ 936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $ 404 million discount).

80


Table of Contents

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation received approval from the Federal Reserve System to repay the $935 million in TARP Capital Purchase Program funds. On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repurchase of $935 million of Fixed Rate Popular Capital Trust III Capital Securities, $1,000 liquidation amount per security (the “trust capital securities”), of Popular Capital Trust III, held by the U.S. Treasury. On July 23, 2014, the Corporation exchanged $936 million of Fixed Rate Perpetual Junior Subordinated Debentures Series A (the “trust debentures”) held by Popular Capital Trust III for the trust capital securities and the common securities of Popular Capital Trust III, in the amount of $1 million, held by the Corporation. The trust debentures were then cancelled and the obligations of the Corporation under the related indenture were satisfied and discharged. On the same date, Popular Capital Trust III was dissolved. In connection with the repayment of TARP, the Corporation accelerated the related amortization of the discount and deferred costs amounting to $414.1 million during the second quarter of 2014, which is reflected as part of interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Refer to note 37, Subsequent Events, for additional information on the repayment of TARP.

In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance under Basel I, the trust preferred securities represent restricted core capital elements and currently qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to certain quantitative limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1 capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25% of the sum of all core capital elements (including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s restricted core capital elements exceeded the 25% limitation as a result of the acceleration of the unamortized discount of the TARP funds and, as such, $45 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities were included as Tier 2 capital. At December 31, 2013, the Corporation’s restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25% limitation.

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved final rules (“New Capital Rules”) to establish a new comprehensive regulatory capital framework for all U.S. banking organizations. The New Capital Rules generally implement the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s (the “Basel Committee”) December 2010 final capital framework referred to as “Basel III” for strengthening international capital standards and several changes to the U.S. regulatory capital regime required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection on Act (“Dodd-Frank”). The New Capital Rules require that capital instruments such as trust preferred securities be phased-out of Tier 1 capital. The Corporation’s Tier I capital level at June 30, 2014 included $ 427 million of trust preferred securities that are subject to the phase-out provisions of the New Capital Rules. The Corporation would be allowed to include only 25% of such trust preferred securities in Tier I capital as of January 1, 2015 and 0% as of January 1, 2016 and thereafter. The New Capital Rules also permanently grandfathers as Tier 2 capital such trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 are exempt from the phase-out provision. As mentioned above, these trust preferred securities were repaid in full on July 2, 2014.

81


Table of Contents

Note 21 – Stockholders’ equity

BPPR statutory reserve

The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPR’s net income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPR’s statutory reserve fund amounted to $445 million at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $445 million). There were no transfers between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013.

As stated in Note 37, Subsequent Events, on July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of the TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury. Also, on July 23, 2014, the Corporation completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008 for a repurchase price of $3 million. The warrant represented the right to purchase 2,093,284 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $67 per share with an original term of 10 years. The purchase price of $3.0 million will be reflected as a reduction of surplus in stockholders’ equity on July 2014.

82


Table of Contents

Note 22 – Other comprehensive loss

The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss by Component [1]

(In thousands)

Quarters ended
June 30,
2014
2013 Six months ended
June 30,
2014
2013

Foreign currency translation

Beginning Balance

$ (30,496 ) $ (30,553 ) $ (36,099 ) $ (31,277 )

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

(603 ) (2,653 ) (2,718 ) (1,929 )

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss

7,718

Net change

(603 ) (2,653 ) 5,000 (1,929 )

Ending balance

$ (31,099 ) $ (33,206 ) $ (31,099 ) $ (33,206 )

Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans

Beginning Balance

$ (103,584 ) $ (221,528 ) $ (104,302 ) $ (225,846 )

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss for amortization of net losses

1,297 3,207 2,594 7,525

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss for amortization of prior service cost

(580 ) (1,159 )

Net change

717 3,207 1,435 7,525

Ending balance

$ (102,867 ) $ (218,321 ) $ (102,867 ) $ (218,321 )

Unrealized net holding gains (losses) on investments

Beginning Balance

$ (22,255 ) $ 130,562 $ (48,344 ) $ 154,568

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

26,326 (106,572 ) 52,415 (130,578 )

Net change

26,326 (106,572 ) 52,415 (130,578 )

Ending balance

$ 4,071 $ 23,990 $ 4,071 $ 23,990

Unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

Beginning Balance

$ 60 $ (489 ) $ $ (313 )

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications

(1,554 ) 4,118 (2,607 ) 4,048

Amounts reclassified from other accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

1,098 (2,131 ) 2,211 (2,237 )

Net change

(456 ) 1,987 (396 ) 1,811

Ending balance

$ (396 ) $ 1,498 $ (396 ) $ 1,498

Total

$ (130,291 ) $ (226,039 ) $ (130,291 ) $ (226,039 )

[1] All amounts presented are net of tax.

83


Table of Contents

The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Affected Line Item in the

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Quarters ended
June 30,
Six months ended
June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Foreign Currency Translation

Cumulative translation adjustment reclassified into earnings

Other operating income

$ $ $ (7,718 ) $

Total before tax

(7,718 )

Total net of tax

$ $ $ (7,718 ) $

Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans

Amortization of net losses

Personnel costs

$ (2,126 ) $ (6,169 ) $ (4,252 ) $ (12,338 )

Amortization of prior service cost

Personnel costs

950 1,900

Total before tax

(1,176 ) (6,169 ) (2,352 ) (12,338 )

Income tax benefit

459 2,962 917 4,813

Total net of tax

$ (717 ) $ (3,207 ) $ (1,435 ) $ (7,525 )

Unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

Forward contracts

Mortgage banking activities

$ (1,800 ) $ 3,045 $ (3,624 ) $ 3,196

Total before tax

(1,800 ) 3,045 (3,624 ) 3,196

Income tax benefit (expense)

702 (914 ) 1,413 (959 )

Total net of tax

$ (1,098 ) $ 2,131 $ (2,211 ) $ 2,237

Total reclassification adjustments, net of tax

$ (1,815 ) $ (1,076 ) $ (11,364 ) $ (5,288 )

84


Table of Contents

Note 23 – Guarantees

At June 30, 2014 the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.5 million (December 31, 2013 - $0.4 million), which represents the unamortized balance of the obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit. Management does not anticipate any material losses related to these instruments.

From time to time, the Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral for the mortgage-backed securities. The Corporation has not sold any mortgage loans subject to credit recourse since 2009. At June 30, 2014 the Corporation serviced $ 2.3 billion (December 31, 2013 - $ 2.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and FHLMC residential mortgage loan securitization programs. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation repurchased approximately $ 21 million and $ 48 million, respectively, of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions (June 30, 2013 - $ 36 million and $ 66 million, respectively). In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers ultimate losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property. At June 30, 2014 the Corporation’s liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $ 48 million (December 31, 2013 - $ 41 million).

The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability of estimated losses related to loans serviced with credit recourse provisions during the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance as of beginning of period

$ 45,809 $ 47,983 $ 41,463 $ 51,673

Provision for recourse liability

7,984 6,688 19,026 10,785

Net charge-offs / terminations

(5,901 ) (8,779 ) (12,597 ) (16,566 )

Balance as of end of period

$ 47,892 $ 45,892 $ 47,892 $ 45,892

The estimated losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a liability when the loans are sold or credit recourse is assumed as part of acquired servicing rights, and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in the line item “adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold” in the consolidated statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the following twelve-month period. Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value ratios, and loan aging, among others.

When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporation’s mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or are sold directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses and bear any subsequent loss related to the loans. Repurchases under BPPR’s representation and warranty arrangements for the six months ended June 30, 2014 approximated $ 2.2 million, in unpaid principal balance, with losses amounting to $ 1.6 million, and $ 3.0 million and $ 0.5 million, respectively, for the same period of 2013.

85


Table of Contents

A substantial amount of these loans reinstate to performing status or have mortgage insurance, and thus the ultimate losses on the loans are not deemed significant.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representations and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of non-performing mortgage loans. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $16.3 million. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $3.0 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. BPPR’s obligations under this clause end one year after the closing except to any claim asserted prior to such termination date. The reserve balance has been maintained to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently being evaluated.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representations and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $18.0 million. BPPR is not required to repurchase any of the assets. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $10.7 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, the Corporation released $2.0 million based on an evaluation of claims received under this clause.

The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated with indemnifications and representations and warranties related to loans sold by BPPR for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance as of beginning of period

$ 23,731 $ 17,603 $ 26,261 $ 7,587

Additions for new sales

3,047 13,747

Provision (reversal) for representation and warranties

(1,647 ) 415 (2,663 ) 125

Net charge-offs / terminations

(504 ) (106 ) (2,018 ) (500 )

Balance as of end of period

$ 21,580 $ 20,959 $ 21,580 $ 20,959

In addition, at June 30, 2014, the Corporation has reserves for customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. These loans were sold to investors on a servicing released basis subject to certain representation and warranties. Although the risk of loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation made certain representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if not correct, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify investors for any related losses associated with these loans. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $ 5 million, which was included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition (December 31, 2013 - $ 7 million). E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008 and most of the outstanding agreements with major counterparties were settled during 2010 and 2011.

Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation serviced $ 16.1 billion in mortgage loans for third-parties, including the loans serviced with credit recourse (December 31, 2013 - $ 16.3 billion). The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantees programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At June 30, 2014, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $24 million (December 31, 2013 - $29 million). To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporation’s servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.

86


Table of Contents

Popular, Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries amounting to $ 0.2 billion at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $ 0.2 billion). In addition, at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis $ 1.4 billion of capital securities (trust preferred securities) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the trust preferred securities.

87


Table of Contents

Note 24 – Commitments and contingencies

Off-balance sheet risk

The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan commitments, letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amounts of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations as it does for those reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk, whose contract amounts represent potential credit risk as of the end of the periods presented were as follows:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Commitments to extend credit:

Credit card lines

$ 4,559,678 $ 4,594,676

Commercial lines of credit

2,095,220 2,569,377

Other unused credit commitments

287,027 326,874

Commercial letters of credit

4,621 3,059

Standby letters of credit

47,762 78,948

Commitments to originate or fund mortgage loans

32,707 47,722

Balances for the financial instruments presented in the above table as of June 30, 2014 are presented excluding discontinued operations.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $6 million for potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit (December 31, 2013 - $7 million).

Other commitments

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation also maintained other non-credit commitments for $10 million, primarily for the acquisition of other investments (December 31, 2013 - $10 million).

Business concentration

Since the Corporation’s business activities are currently concentrated primarily in Puerto Rico, its results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the general trends of the Puerto Rico economy and, in particular, the residential and commercial real estate markets. The concentration of the Corporation’s operations in Puerto Rico exposes it to greater risk than other banking companies with a wider geographic base. Its asset and revenue composition by geographical area is presented in Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $833 million, of which approximately $709 million is outstanding ($1.2 billion and $950 million at December 31, 2013). Of the amount outstanding, $570 million consists of loans and $139 million are securities ($789 million and $161 million at December 31, 2013). Of this amount, $272 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that are either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment ($527 million at December 31, 2013). Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $437 million represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment ($423 million at December 31, 2013). These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality.

88


Table of Contents

In addition, at June 30, 2014, the Corporation had $360 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default ($360 million at December 31, 2013). These included $279 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (December 31, 2013 - $274 million). These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Also, the Corporation had $48 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $33 million of industrial development notes ($52 million and $34 million at December 31, 2013).

Other contingencies

As indicated in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, as part of the loss sharing agreements related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The fair value of the true-up payment obligation was estimated at $128 million at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $128 million).

Legal Proceedings

The nature of Popular’s business ordinarily results in a certain number of claims, litigation, investigations, and legal and administrative cases and proceedings. When the Corporation determines it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, it vigorously defends itself. The Corporation will consider the settlement of cases (including cases where it has meritorious defenses) when, in management’s judgment, it is in the best interest of both the Corporation and its shareholders to do so.

On at least a quarterly basis, Popular assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For matters where it is probable that the Corporation will incur a material loss and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the Corporation establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is adjusted on at least a quarterly basis as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For matters where a material loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.

In certain cases, exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual to the extent such loss is reasonably possible, but not probable. Management believes and estimates that the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses (with respect to those matters where such limits may be determined, in excess of amounts accrued), for current legal proceedings ranges from $0 to approximately $43.5 million as of June 30, 2014. For certain other cases, management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss at this time. Any estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants in several of the current proceedings whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the numerous unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, management’s estimate will change from time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate.

While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, management believes that the amount it has already accrued is adequate and any incremental liability arising from the Corporation’s legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial position as a whole. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporation’s consolidated financial position in a particular period.

Ongoing Class Action Litigation

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America are currently defendants in various class action lawsuits:

On November 21, 2012, BPNA was served with a putative class action complaint captioned Valle v. Popular Community Bank filed in the New York State Supreme Court (New York County). Plaintiffs, existing BPNA customers, allege among other things that BPNA has engaged in unfair and deceptive acts and trade practices relative to the assessment of overdraft fees and payment processing on consumer deposit accounts. The complaint further alleges that BPNA improperly disclosed its consumer overdraft policies and, additionally, that the overdraft rates and fees assessed by BPNA violate New York’s usury laws. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, including punitive damages, interest, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees and costs. BPNA removed the case to federal court (S.D.N.Y.), and plaintiffs subsequently filed a motion to remand the action to state court, which the Court has granted on August 6, 2013. A motion to dismiss was filed on September 9, 2013. On October 25, 2013, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint seeking to limit the putative class to New York account holders. A motion to dismiss the amended complaint was filed in February 2014 and is currently pending resolution. The parties are currently engaged in class certification-related discovery.

89


Table of Contents

Between December 2013 and January 2014, BPPR, BPNA and Popular, Inc., along with two executive officers, were served with a putative class action complaint captioned Quiles et al. v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico et al. Plaintiffs essentially allege that they and others, who have been employed by the Defendants as “bank tellers” and other similarly titled positions, were generally paid only for scheduled work time, rather than all time actually worked. The Complaint seeks to maintain a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act on behalf of all individuals who were employed or are currently employed by the Defendants in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, New York, New Jersey, Florida, California, and Illinois as hourly paid, non-exempt, bank tellers or other similarly titled positions at any time during the past three years and alleges the following claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act against all Defendants: (i) failure to pay overtime premiums; and (ii) that the failure to pay was willful. Similar claims are brought under Puerto Rico law on behalf of all individuals who were employed or are currently employed by BPPR in Puerto Rico as hourly paid, non-exempt, bank tellers or other similarly titled positions at any time during the past three years. On January 31, 2014, the Popular defendants filed an answer to the complaint. On February 24, 2014, the parties reached an agreement to dismiss the complaint against BPNA and the named BPNA executive officer without prejudice. The parties are currently engaged in class certification-related discovery.

On May 5, 2014, a putative class action captioned Nora Fernandez, et al. v. UBS, et al . was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors in 23 Puerto Rico closed-end investment companies against various UBS entities, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Popular Securities. UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico is the sponsor and co-sponsor of all 23 funds, while Banco Popular de Puerto Rico was co-sponsor, together with UBS, of nine funds. The plaintiffs allege breach of fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract against all defendants. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, including disgorgement of fees and attorneys’ fees. On May 30, 2014, plaintiffs requested the voluntary dismissal of their class action in the SDNY and on that same date, they filed a virtually identical complaint in the US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (USDC-PR) and requested that the case be consolidated with the matter of In re: UBS Financial Services Securities Litigation , a class action currently pending before the USDC-PR in which neither BPPR nor Popular Securities are parties. Recently, the UBS defendants filed an opposition to the consolidation request and demanded that the case be transferred back to the SDNY on the ground that the relevant agreements between the parties contain a clear and unambiguous choice of forum clause, with New York as the selected forum. The Popular defendants joined this motion. The motion remains pending to date.

On May 6, 2014, a putative class action captioned David Alvarez, et al. v. Banco Popular North America was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Plaintiffs generally assert that BPNA has engaged in purported violations of §2954.8(a) of the California Civil Code and §17200 et seq. of the California Business Professions Code, which allegedly require financial institutions that make loans secured by certain types of real property located within the state of California to pay interest to borrowers on impound account deposits at a statutory rate of not less than two percent (2%). Plaintiffs maintain that BPNA has not paid interest on such deposits and demand that BPNA be enjoined from engaging in further violations of these provisions and pay an unspecified amount of damages sufficient to repay the unpaid interest on these deposits. PHH Corporation, which acquired the loans at issue in this complaint, has tentatively agreed to indemnify and tender a defense on behalf of BPNA. The court recently entered an order staying all substantive activity, including any responsive pleading, until the initial conference scheduled for August 22, 2014.

Other Matters

The declines in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end investment companies that invest primarily in Puerto Rico municipal obligations since August 2013 have led to regulatory inquiries, customer complaints and arbitrations for most broker-dealers in Puerto Rico, including Popular Securities LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation (“Popular Securities”). Popular Securities has received customer complaints and is named as a respondent (among other broker-dealers) in arbitration proceedings with aggregate claimed damages of approximately $71.5 million, including one arbitration with claimed damages of $60 million in which two other Puerto Rico broker-dealers are co-defendants, in connection with customers who own such securities. The proceedings are in their early stages and it is the view of the Corporation that Popular Securities has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted.

In addition, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has notified Popular Securities that it is conducting an examination of broker-dealers in Puerto Rico, including Popular Securities, with respect to the sale of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end investment companies that invest primarily in Puerto Rico municipal obligations. As a self-regulatory agency, FINRA may impose monetary penalties, issue cease-and-desist orders and or require restitution of customer losses. An adverse result in any of the matters described above could materially and adversely affect the Corporation’s broker-dealer subsidiary.

90


Table of Contents

Other Significant Proceedings

As described under “Note 11 – FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation”, in connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, on April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC with respect to the covered loans and other real estate owned that it acquired in the transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the loss share agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC reimburses BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR reimburses the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid 80% reimbursement under those loss share agreements. The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow in order to receive reimbursement for losses from the FDIC. BPPR believes that it has complied with such terms and conditions. The loss share agreement applicable to the commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans described below provides for loss sharing by the FDIC through the quarter ending June 30, 2015 and for reimbursement to the FDIC through the quarter ending June 30, 2018.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2010 through March 31, 2012, BPPR received reimbursement for loss-share claims submitted to the FDIC, including charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. When BPPR submitted its shared-loss claim in connection with the June 30, 2012 quarter, however, the FDIC refused to reimburse BPPR for a portion of the claim because of a difference related to the methodology for the computation of charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO. In accordance with the terms of the commercial loss share agreement, BPPR applied a methodology for charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans that conforms to its regulatory supervisory criteria and is calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. The FDIC has stated that it believes that BPPR should use a different methodology for those charge-offs. Notwithstanding the FDIC’s refusal to reimburse BPPR for certain shared-loss claims, BPPR has continued to calculate shared-loss claims for quarters subsequent to June 30, 2012 in accordance with its charge off policy for non-covered assets. As of June 30, 2014, BPPR had unreimbursed shared-loss claims of $369.4 million under the commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC. On July 25, 2014, BPPR received a payment of $66.3 million related to reimbursable shared-loss claims from the FDIC. After giving effect to this payment, BPPR has unreimbursed shared-loss claims amounting to $303.1 million. If the reimbursement amount for these claims were calculated in accordance with the FDIC’s preferred methodology for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans, the amount of such claims would be reduced by approximately $156.6 million.

BPPR’s loss share agreements with the FDIC specify that disputes can be submitted to arbitration before a review board under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. On July 31, 2013, BPPR filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association requesting that the review board determine certain matters relating to the loss-share claims under the commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC, including that the review board award BPPR the amounts owed under its unpaid quarterly certificates. The statement of claim includes requests for reimbursement of certain valuation adjustments for discounts to appraised values, costs to sell troubled assets and other items. The review board is comprised of one arbitrator appointed by BPPR, one arbitrator appointed by the FDIC and a third arbitrator selected by agreement of those arbitrators. The arbitration hearing date has been set for October 2014.

To the extent that we are not able to successfully resolve this matter through the arbitration process described above, a material difference could result in the timing and amount of charge-offs recorded by us and the amount of charge-offs reimbursed by the FDIC under the commercial loss share agreement. That could require us to make a material adjustment to the value of our loss share assets and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

91


Table of Contents

Note 25 – Non-consolidated variable interest entities

The Corporation is involved with four statutory trusts which it established to issue trust preferred securities to the public. Also, it established Popular Capital Trust III for the purpose of exchanging Series C preferred stock shares held by the U.S. Treasury for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. These trusts are deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”) since the equity investors at risk have no substantial decision-making rights. The Corporation does not hold any variable interest in the trusts, and therefore, cannot be the trusts’ primary beneficiary. Furthermore, the Corporation concluded that it did not hold a controlling financial interest in these trusts since the decisions of the trusts are predetermined through the trust documents and the guarantee of the trust preferred securities is irrelevant since in substance the sponsor is guaranteeing its own debt.

Also, the Corporation is involved with various special purpose entities mainly in guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions, including GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC. These special purpose entities are deemed to be VIEs since they lack equity investments at risk. The Corporation’s continuing involvement in these guaranteed loan securitizations includes owning certain beneficial interests in the form of securities as well as the servicing rights retained. The Corporation is not required to provide additional financial support to any of the variable interest entities to which it has transferred the financial assets. The mortgage-backed securities, to the extent retained, are classified in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition as available-for-sale or trading securities. The Corporation concluded that, essentially, these entities (FNMA, GNMA, and FHLMC) control the design of their respective VIEs, dictate the quality and nature of the collateral, require the underlying insurance, set the servicing standards via the servicing guides and can change them at will, and can remove a primary servicer with cause, and without cause in the case of FNMA and FHLMC. Moreover, through their guarantee obligations, agencies (FNMA, GNMA, and FHLMC) have the obligation to absorb losses that could be potentially significant to the VIE.

ASU 2009-17 requires that an ongoing primary beneficiary assessment should be made to determine whether the Corporation is the primary beneficiary of any of the VIEs it is involved with. The conclusion on the assessment of these trusts and guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions has not changed since their initial evaluation. The Corporation concluded that it is still not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and therefore, these VIEs are not required to be consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements at June 30, 2014.

The Corporation holds variable interests in these VIEs in the form of agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, including those securities originated by the Corporation and those acquired from third parties. Additionally, the Corporation holds agency mortgage-backed securities, agency collateralized mortgage obligations and private label collateralized mortgage obligations issued by third party VIEs in which it has no other form of continuing involvement. Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the debt securities outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, which are classified as available-for-sale and trading securities in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition. In addition, the Corporation may retain the right to service the transferred loans in those government-sponsored special purpose entities (“SPEs”) and may also purchase the right to service loans in other government-sponsored SPEs that were transferred to those SPEs by a third-party. Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 810-10, the servicing fees that the Corporation receives for its servicing role are considered variable interests in the VIEs since the servicing fees are subordinated to the principal and interest that first needs to be paid to the mortgage-backed securities’ investors and to the guaranty fees that need to be paid to the federal agencies.

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets related to the Corporation’s variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs and the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Corporation’s involvement as servicer with non-consolidated VIEs at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Assets

Servicing assets:

Mortgage servicing rights

$ 108,418 $ 113,437

Total servicing assets

$ 108,418 $ 113,437

Other assets:

Servicing advances

$ 2,075 $ 1,416

Total other assets

$ 2,075 $ 1,416

Total assets

$ 110,493 $ 114,853

Maximum exposure to loss

$ 110,493 $ 114,853

92


Table of Contents

The size of the non-consolidated VIEs, in which the Corporation has a variable interest in the form of servicing fees, measured as the total unpaid principal balance of the loans, amounted to $9 billion at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $9.2 billion).

Maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss, under a worst case scenario, that would be incurred by the Corporation, as servicer for the VIEs, assuming all loans serviced are delinquent and that the value of the Corporation’s interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery. The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss includes the fair value of the MSRs and the assumption that the servicing advances at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, will not be recovered. The agency debt securities are not included as part of the maximum exposure to loss since they are guaranteed by the related agencies.

In September of 2011, BPPR sold construction and commercial real estate loans with a fair value of $148 million, and most of which were non-performing, to a newly created joint venture, PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC. The joint venture is majority owned by Caribbean Property Group (“CPG”), Goldman Sachs & Co. and East Rock Capital LLC. The joint venture was created for the limited purpose of acquiring the loans from BPPR; servicing the loans through a third-party servicer; ultimately working out, resolving and/or foreclosing the loans; and indirectly owning, operating, constructing, developing, leasing and selling any real properties acquired by the joint venture through deed in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure, or by resolution of any loan.

BPPR provided financing to the joint venture for the acquisition of the loans in an amount equal to the sum of 57% of the purchase price of the loans, or $84 million, and $2 million of closing costs, for a total acquisition loan of $86 million (the “acquisition loan”). The acquisition loan has a 5-year maturity and bears a variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is secured by a pledge of all of the acquiring entity’s assets. In addition, BPPR provided the joint venture with a non-revolving advance facility (the “advance facility”) of $68.5 million to cover unfunded commitments and costs-to-complete related to certain construction projects, and a revolving working capital line (the “working capital line”) of $20 million to fund certain operating expenses of the joint venture. Cash proceeds received by the joint venture are first used to cover debt service payments for the acquisition loan, advance facility, and the working capital line described above which must be paid in full before proceeds can be used for other purposes. The distributable cash proceeds are determined based on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the respective equity ownership percentages. BPPR’s equity interest in the joint venture ranks pari-passu with those of other parties involved. As part of the transaction executed in September 2011, BPPR received $ 48 million in cash and a 24.9% equity interest in the joint venture. The Corporation is not required to provide any other financial support to the joint venture.

BPPR accounted for this transaction as a true sale pursuant to ASC Subtopic 860-10 and thus recognized the cash received, its equity investment in the joint venture, and the acquisition loan provided to the joint venture and derecognized the loans sold.

The Corporation has determined that PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is a VIE but the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary. All decisions are made by CPG (or an affiliate thereof) (the “Manager”), except for certain limited material decisions which would require the unanimous consent of all members. The Manager is authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the joint venture any and all documents, contracts, certificates, agreements and instruments, and to take any action deemed necessary in the benefit of the joint venture. Also, the Manager delegates the day-to-day management and servicing of the loans to CPG Island Servicing, LLC, an affiliate of CPG, which contracted Archon, an affiliate of Goldman Sachs, to act as sub-servicer, but it has the responsibility to oversee such servicing responsibilities.

The Corporation holds variable interests in this VIE in the form of the 24.9% equity interest (the “Investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC”) and the financing provided to the joint venture. The equity interest is accounted for under the equity method of accounting pursuant to ASC Subtopic 323-10.

The initial fair value of the Corporation’s equity interest in the joint venture was determined based on the fair value of the loans and real estate owned transferred to the joint venture of $148 million which represented the purchase price of the loans agreed by the parties and was an arm’s-length transaction between market participants in accordance with ASC Topic 820, reduced by the acquisition loan provided by BPPR to the joint venture, for a total net equity of $63 million. Accordingly, the 24.9% equity interest held by the Corporation was valued at $16 million. Thus, the fair value of the equity interest is considered a Level 2 fair value measurement since the inputs were based on observable market inputs.

93


Table of Contents

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets and liabilities related to the Corporation’s variable interests in the non-consolidated VIE, PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC, and its maximum exposure to loss at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Assets

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Acquisition loan

$ $ 3,233

Advances under the working capital line

518 390

Advances under the advance facility

7,392 16,024

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 7,910 $ 19,647

Accrued interest receivable

$ 30 $ 65

Other assets:

Investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings LLC

$ 24,818 $ 26,596

Total assets

$ 32,758 $ 46,308

Deposits

$ (3,596 ) $ (3,621 )

Total liabilities

$ (3,596 ) $ (3,621 )

Total net assets

$ 29,162 $ 42,687

Maximum exposure to loss

$ 29,162 $ 42,687

The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss under a worst case scenario at June 30, 2014 would be not recovering the carrying amount of the acquisition loan, the advances on the advance facility and working capital line, if any, and the equity interest held by the Corporation, net of the deposits.

On March 25, 2013, BPPR completed a sale of assets with a book value of $509.0 million, of which $500.6 million were in non-performing status, comprised of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned, with a combined unpaid principal balance on loans and appraised value of other real estate owned of approximately $987.0 million to a newly created joint venture, PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC. The joint venture is majority owned by Caribbean Property Group LLC (“CPG”) and certain affiliates of Perella Weinberg Partners’ Asset Based Value Strategy. The joint venture was created for the limited purpose of acquiring the loans from BPPR; servicing the loans through a third-party servicer; ultimately working out, resolving and/or foreclosing the loans; and indirectly owning, operating, constructing, developing, leasing and selling any real properties acquired by the joint venture through deed in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure, or by resolution of any loan.

BPPR provided financing to the joint venture for the acquisition of the assets in an amount equal to the sum of 57% of the purchase price of the assets, and closing costs, for a total acquisition loan of $182.4 million (the “acquisition loan”). The acquisition loan has a 5-year maturity and bears a variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is secured by a pledge of all of the acquiring entity’s assets. In addition, BPPR provided the joint venture with a non-revolving advance facility (the “advance facility”) of $35.0 million to cover unfunded commitments and costs-to-complete related to certain construction projects, and a revolving working capital line (the “working capital line”) of $30.0 million to fund certain operating expenses of the joint venture. Cash proceeds received by the joint venture are first used to cover debt service payments for the acquisition loan, advance facility, and the working capital line described above which must be paid in full before proceeds can be used for other purposes. The distributable cash proceeds are determined based on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the respective equity ownership percentages. BPPR’s equity interest in the joint venture ranks pari-passu with those of other parties involved. As part of the transaction executed in March 2013, BPPR received $92.3 million in cash and a 24.9% equity interest in the joint venture. The Corporation is not required to provide any other financial support to the joint venture.

BPPR accounted for this transaction as a true sale pursuant to ASC Subtopic 860-10 and thus recognized the cash received, its equity investment in the joint venture, and the acquisition loan provided to the joint venture and derecognized the loans and real estate owned sold.

The Corporation has determined that PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is a VIE but the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary. All decisions are made by CPG (or an affiliate thereof) (the “Manager”), except for certain limited material decisions which would require the unanimous consent of all members. The Manager is authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the joint

94


Table of Contents

venture any and all documents, contracts, certificates, agreements and instruments, and to take any action deemed necessary in the benefit of the joint venture. Also, the Manager delegates the day-to-day management and servicing of the loans to PR Asset Portfolio Servicing International, LLC, an affiliate of CPG.

The initial fair value of the Corporation’s equity interest in the joint venture was determined based on the fair value of the loans and real estate owned transferred to the joint venture of $306 million which represented the purchase price of the loans agreed by the parties and was an arm’s-length transaction between market participants in accordance with ASC Topic 820, reduced by the acquisition loan provided by BPPR to the joint venture, for a total net equity of $124 million. Accordingly, the 24.9% equity interest held by the Corporation was valued at $31 million. Thus, the fair value of the equity interest is considered a Level 2 fair value measurement since the inputs were based on observable market inputs.

The Corporation holds variable interests in this VIE in the form of the 24.9% equity interest (the “Investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC”) and the financing provided to the joint venture. The equity interest is accounted for under the equity method of accounting pursuant to ASC Subtopic 323-10.

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets and liabilities related to the Corporation’s variable interests in the non-consolidated VIE, PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC, and its maximum exposure to loss at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Assets

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Acquisition loan

$ 122,536 $ 157,660

Advances under the working capital line

1,099 1,196

Advances under the advance facility

6,968 1,427

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 130,603 $ 160,283

Accrued interest receivable

$ 362 $ 436

Other assets:

Investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ 32,079 $ 30,478

Total assets

$ 163,044 $ 191,197

Deposits

$ (20,871 ) $ (20,808 )

Total liabilities

$ (20,871 ) $ (20,808 )

Total net assets

$ 142,173 $ 170,389

Maximum exposure to loss

$ 142,173 $ 170,389

The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss under a worst case scenario at June 30, 2014 would be not recovering the carrying amount of the acquisition loan, the advances on the advance facility and working capital line, if any, and the equity interest held by the Corporation, net of the deposits.

95


Table of Contents

Note 26 – Related party transactions with affiliated company / joint venture

EVERTEC

The Corporation has an investment in EVERTEC, Inc. (“EVERTEC”), which provides various processing and information technology services to the Corporation and its subsidiaries and gives BPPR access to the ATH network owned and operated by EVERTEC. As of June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s stake in EVERTEC is of 14.8%. The investment in EVERTEC is accounted for under the equity method and is evaluated for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has occurred that is other than temporary. Refer to Note 31 “Related party transactions” to the consolidated financial statements included in the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Report for details.

The Corporation received $ 2.3 million in dividend distributions during the six months ended June 30, 2014 from its investments in EVERTEC’s holding company and none during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The Corporation’s equity in EVERTEC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Equity investment in EVERTEC

$ 22,159 $ 19,931

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with EVERTEC at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Items that represent liabilities to the Corporation are presented with parenthesis.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Accounts receivable (Other assets)

3,730 8,634

Deposits

(16,971 ) (14,289 )

Accounts payable (Other liabilities)

(16,594 ) (15,862 )

Net total

$ (29,835 ) $ (21,517 )

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from EVERTEC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of EVERTEC’s income (loss) and changes in stockholders’ equity for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2014
Six months ended
June 30, 2014

Share of income from the investment in EVERTEC

$ 2,553 $ 5,332

Share of other changes in EVERTEC’s stockholders’ equity

83 321

Share of EVERTEC’s changes in equity recognized in income

$ 2,636 $ 5,653

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2013
Six months ended
June 30, 2013

Share of loss from the investment in EVERTEC

(18,652 ) (17,545 )

Share of other changes in EVERTEC’s stockholders’ equity

37,722 36,067

Share of EVERTEC’s changes in equity recognized in income

$ 19,070 $ 18,522

The following tables present the transactions and service payments between the Corporation and EVERTEC (as an affiliate) and their impact on the results of operations for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Items that represent expenses to the Corporation are presented with parenthesis.

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2014
Six months ended
June 30, 2014
Category

Interest expense on deposits

(19 ) (39 ) Interest expense

ATH and credit cards interchange income from services to EVERTEC

6,709 13,128 Other service fees

Rental income charged to EVERTEC

1,750 3,427 Net occupancy

Processing fees on services provided by EVERTEC

(38,877 ) (77,639 ) Professional fees

Other services provided to EVERTEC

233 454 Other operating expenses

Total

$ (30,204 ) $ (60,669 )

96


Table of Contents

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2013
Six months ended
June 30, 2013
Category

Interest income on loan to EVERTEC

$ 1,638 $ 2,491 Interest income

Interest income on investment securities issued by EVERTEC

306 1,269 Interest income

Interest expense on deposits

(30 ) (57 ) Interest expense

ATH and credit cards interchange income from services to EVERTEC

6,364 12,389 Other service fees

Debt prepayment penalty paid by EVERTEC

5,856 5,856

Net gain (loss) and valuation
adjustments on investment
securities


Consulting agreements fees paid by EVERTEC

9,854 9,854 Other operating income

Rental income charged to EVERTEC

1,683 3,364 Net occupancy

Processing fees on services provided by EVERTEC

(38,399 ) (76,275 ) Professional fees

Other services provided to EVERTEC

226 430 Other operating expenses

Total

$ (12,502 ) $ (40,679 )

EVERTEC has a letter of credit issued by BPPR, for an amount of $ 3.6 million at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $ 3.6 million). The Corporation also agreed to maintain outstanding this letter of credit for a 5-year period which expires on September 30, 2015. EVERTEC and the Corporation entered into a Reimbursement Agreement, in which EVERTEC will reimburse the Corporation for any losses incurred by the Corporation in connection with the performance bonds and the letter of credit. Possible losses resulting from these agreements are considered insignificant.

PRLP 2011 Holdings LLC

As indicated in Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation holds a 24.9% equity interest in PRLP 2011 Holdings LLC and currently provides certain financing to the joint venture as well as holds certain deposits from the entity.

The Corporation’s equity in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Equity investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

$ 24,818 $ 26,596

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Loans

$ 7,910 $ 19,647

Accrued interest receivable

30 65

Deposits (non-interest bearing)

(3,596 ) (3,621 )

Net total

$ 4,344 $ 16,091

97


Table of Contents

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of income (loss) from PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2014
Six months ended
June 30, 2014

Share of loss from the equity investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

$ (32 ) $ (1,778 )

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2013
Six months ended
June 30, 2013

Share of income from the equity investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

$ 733 $ 2,730

The following table presents transactions between the Corporation and PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC and their impact on the Corporation’s results of operations for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2014
Six months ended
June 30, 2014
Category

Interest income on loan to PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

$ 99 $ 271 Interest income

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2013
Six months ended
June 30, 2013
Category

Interest income on loan to PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

$ 277 $ 674 Interest income

PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

As indicated in Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements, effective March 2013 the Corporation holds a 24.9% equity interest in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC and currently provides certain financing to the joint venture as well as holds certain deposits from the entity.

The Corporation’s equity in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ 32,079 $ 30,478

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC, at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Loans

$ 130,603 $ 160,283

Accrued interest receivable

362 436

Deposits

(20,871 ) (20,808 )

Net total

$ 110,094 $ 139,911

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of income (loss) from PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

98


Table of Contents

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2014
Six months ended
June 30, 2014

Share of income from the equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ 161 $ 1,450

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2013
Six months ended
June 30, 2013

Share of loss from the equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ (2,303 ) $ (2,303 )

The following table presents transactions between the Corporation and PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC and their impact on the Corporation’s results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2014
Six months ended
June 30, 2014
Category

Interest income on loan to PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ 1,082 $ 2,344 Interest income

Servicing fee paid by PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

70 Other service fees

Total

$ 1,082 $ 2,414

(In thousands)

Quarter ended
June 30, 2013
Six months ended
June 30, 2013
Category

Interest income on loan to PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ 116 $ 116 Interest income

Servicing fee paid by PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

45 45 Other service fees

Total

$ 161 $ 161

99


Table of Contents

Note 27 – Fair value measurement

ASC Subtopic 820-10 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market.

Level 2 - Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporation’s own assumptions about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs internally-developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value is adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporation’s credit standing, constraints on liquidity and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently. There have been no changes in the Corporation’s methodologies used to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities since December 31, 2013. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates in the 2012 Annual Report for additional information on the accounting guidance and the Corporation’s policies or procedures related to fair value measurements.

The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results.

Fair Value on a Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis

The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporation’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

At June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets

Investment securities available-for-sale:

U.S. Treasury securities

$ $ 27,729 $ $ 27,729

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

2,217,230 2,217,230

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

69,171 69,171

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

2,303,472 2,303,472

Collateralized mortgage obligations—private label

130 130

Mortgage-backed securities

1,013,879 6,169 1,020,048

Equity securities

213 4,130 4,343

Other

11,869 11,869

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 213 $ 5,647,610 $ 6,169 $ 5,653,992

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ $ 8,197 $ $ 8,197

100


Table of Contents

Collateralized mortgage obligations

351 1,494 1,845

Mortgage-backed securities—federal agencies

309,280 7,802 317,082

Other

17,389 1,283 18,672

Total trading account securities

$ $ 335,217 $ 10,579 $ 345,796

Mortgage servicing rights

$ $ $ 151,951 $ 151,951

Derivatives

27,586 27,586

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ 213 $ 6,010,413 $ 168,699 $ 6,179,325

Liabilities

Derivatives

$ $ (25,611 ) $ $ (25,611 )

Contingent consideration

(127,551 ) (127,551 )

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ $ (25,611 ) $ (127,551 ) $ (153,162 )

At December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets

Investment securities available-for-sale:

U.S. Treasury securities

$ $ 28,482 $ $ 28,482

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

1,629,205 1,629,205

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

66,377 66,377

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

2,418,296 2,418,296

Collateralized mortgage obligations—private label

513 513

Mortgage-backed securities

1,129,118 6,523 1,135,641

Equity securities

412 3,704 4,116

Other

12,170 12,170

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 412 $ 5,287,865 $ 6,523 $ 5,294,800

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ $ 7,586 $ $ 7,586

Collateralized mortgage obligations

426 1,423 1,849

Mortgage-backed securities—federal agencies

302,952 9,799 312,751

Other

15,545 1,929 17,474

Total trading account securities

$ $ 326,509 $ 13,151 $ 339,660

Mortgage servicing rights

$ $ $ 161,099 $ 161,099

Derivatives

34,793 34,793

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ 412 $ 5,649,167 $ 180,773 $ 5,830,352

Liabilities

Derivatives

$ $ (32,378 ) $ $ (32,378 )

Contingent consideration

(128,299 ) (128,299 )

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ $ (32,378 ) $ (128,299 ) $ (160,677 )

101


Table of Contents

Six months ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets

Write-downs

Loans [1]

$ $ $ 77,279 $ 77,279 $ (18,232 )

Loans held-for-sale [2]

(38 )

Other real estate owned [3]

4,200 35,959 40,159 (14,276 )

Other foreclosed assets [3]

817 817 (733 )

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

$ $ 4,200 $ 114,055 $ 118,255 $ (33,279 )

[1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were written down to their fair value. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

Six months ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets

Write-downs

Loans [1]

$ $ $ 40,801 $ 40,801 $ (22,048 )

Loans held-for-sale [2]

(364,820 )

Other real estate owned [3]

14,788 44,405 59,193 (22,164 )

Other foreclosed assets [3]

230 230 (69 )

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

$ $ 14,788 $ 85,436 $ 100,224 $ (409,101 )

[1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35.Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were written down to their fair value. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Quarter ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

MBS
classified
as investment
securities
available-
for-sale
CMOs
classified
as trading
account
securities
MBS
classified
as trading
account
securities
Other
securities
classified
as trading
account
securities
Mortgage
servicing
rights
Total
assets
Contingent
consideration
Total
liabilities

Balance at March 31, 2014

$ 6,379 $ 1,561 $ 8,301 $ 1,715 $ 156,529 $ 174,485 $ (126,345 ) $ (126,345 )

Gains (losses) included in earnings

(1 ) (1 ) (75 ) (432 ) (7,740 ) (8,249 ) (1,206 ) (1,206 )

Gains (losses) included in OCI

(39 ) (39 )

Additions

500 3,164 3,664

Settlements

(170 ) (66 ) (924 ) (2 ) (1,162 )

Balance at June 30, 2014

$ 6,169 $ 1,494 $ 7,802 $ 1,283 $ 151,951 $ 168,699 $ (127,551 ) $ (127,551 )

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at June 30, 2014

$ $ (1 ) $ (41 ) $ (394 ) $ (2,818 ) $ (3,254 ) $ (1,206 ) $ (1,206 )

102


Table of Contents

Six months ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

MBS
classified
as investment
securities
available-
for-sale
CMOs
classified
as trading
account
securities
MBS
classified
as trading
account
securities
Other
securities
classified
as trading
account
securities
Mortgage
servicing
rights
Total
assets
Contingent
consideration
Total
liabilities

Balance at January 1, 2014

$ 6,523 $ 1,423 $ 9,799 $ 1,929 $ 161,099 $ 180,773 $ (128,299 ) $ (128,299 )

Gains (losses) included in earnings

(3 ) (11 ) (114 ) (646 ) (15,836 ) (16,610 ) (38 ) (38 )

Gains (losses) included in OCI

(81 ) (81 )

Additions

263 651 6,692 7,606

Sales

(1,109 ) (1,109 )

Settlements

(270 ) (181 ) (1,425 ) (4 ) (1,880 ) 786 786

Balance at June 30, 2014

$ 6,169 $ 1,494 $ 7,802 $ 1,283 $ 151,951 $ 168,699 $ (127,551 ) $ (127,551 )

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at June 30, 2014

$ $ (8 ) $ (65 ) $ (530 ) $ (5,842 ) $ (6,445 ) $ (38 ) $ (38 )

Quarter ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

MBS
classified
as investment
securities
available-
for-sale
CMOs
classified
as trading
account
securities
MBS
classified
as trading
account
securities
Other
securities
classified
as trading
account
securities
Mortgage
servicing
rights
Total
assets
Contingent
consideration
Total
liabilities

Balance at March 31, 2013

$ 7,043 $ 2,025 $ 10,937 $ 2,143 $ 153,949 $ 176,097 $ (118,777 ) $ (118,777 )

Gains (losses) included in earnings

(2 ) (3 ) (83 ) (101 ) (5,126 ) (5,315 ) (476 ) (476 )

Gains (losses) included in OCI

(85 ) (85 )

Additions

20 231 5,050 5,301

Sales

(324 ) (324 )

Settlements

(200 ) (65 ) (750 ) (429 ) (1,444 )

Balance at June 30, 2013

$ 6,756 $ 1,653 $ 10,335 $ 2,042 $ 153,444 $ 174,230 $ (119,253 ) $ (119,253 )

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at June 30, 2013

$ $ 1 $ (14 ) $ 48 $ 2,569 $ 2,604 $ (476 ) $ (476 )

Six months ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

MBS
classified
as investment
securities
available-
for-sale
CMOs
classified
as trading
account
securities
MBS
classified
as trading
account
securities
Other
securities
classified as
trading
account
securities
Mortgage
servicing
rights
Total
assets
Contingent
consideration
Total
liabilities

Balance at January 1, 2013

$ 7,070 $ 2,499 $ 11,818 $ 2,240 $ 154,430 $ 178,057 $ (112,002 ) $ (112,002 )

Gains (losses) included in earnings

(3 ) 1 (174 ) (198 ) (10,741 ) (11,115 ) (7,251 ) (7,251 )

Gains (losses) included in OCI

(86 ) (86 )

Additions

25 258 10,197 10,480

Sales

(699 ) (699 )

Settlements

(225 ) (173 ) (1,567 ) (442 ) (2,407 )

Balance at June 30, 2013

$ 6,756 $ 1,653 $ 10,335 $ 2,042 $ 153,444 $ 174,230 $ (119,253 ) $ (119,253 )

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at June 30, 2013

$ $ 3 $ (45 ) $ (7 ) $ 4,013 $ 3,964 $ (7,251 ) $ (7,251 )

There were no transfers in and / or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

103


Table of Contents

Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous tables are reported in the consolidated statement of operations as follows:

Quarter ended June 30, 2014 Six months ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Total gains
(losses) included
in earnings
Changes in unrealized
gains (losses) relating to
assets still held at
reporting date
Total gains
(losses) included
in earnings
Changes in unrealized
gains (losses) relating to
assets still held at
reporting date

Interest income

$ (1 ) $ $ (3 ) $

FDIC loss share (expense) income

(1,206 ) (1,206 ) (38 ) (38 )

Mortgage banking activities

(7,740 ) (2,818 ) (15,836 ) (5,842 )

Trading account profit (loss)

(508 ) (436 ) (771 ) (603 )

Total

$ (9,455 ) $ (4,460 ) $ (16,648 ) $ (6,483 )

Quarter ended June 30, 2013 Six months ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Total gains
(losses) included
in earnings
Changes in unrealized
gains (losses) relating to
assets still held at
reporting date
Total gains
(losses) included
in earnings
Changes in unrealized
gains (losses) relating to
assets still held at
reporting date

Interest income

$ (2 ) $ $ (3 ) $

FDIC loss share (expense) income

(476 ) (476 ) (7,251 ) (7,251 )

Mortgage banking activities

(5,126 ) 2,569 (10,741 ) 4,013

Trading account profit (loss)

(187 ) 35 (371 ) (49 )

Total

$ (5,791 ) $ 2,128 $ (18,366 ) $ (3,287 )

The following table includes quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used to derive the fair value of Level 3 instruments, excluding those instruments for which the unobservable inputs were not developed by the Corporation such as prices of prior transactions and/or unadjusted third-party pricing sources.

(In thousands)

Fair value
at June 30,
2014
Valuation technique Unobservable inputs Weighted average (range)

CMO’s - trading

$ 1,494 Discounted cash flow model Weighted average life 2.3 years (0.7  - 5.1 years)
Yield 3.9% (1.5% - 4.7%)
Constant prepayment rate 23.8% (19.5%  - 26.2%)

Other - trading

$ 842 Discounted cash flow model Weighted average life 5.5 years
Yield 12.2%
Constant prepayment rate 10.8%

Mortgage servicing rights

$ 151,951 Discounted cash flow model Prepayment speed 8.3% (5.7% - 23.9%)
Weighted average life 12.0 years (4.2 - 17.7 years)
Discount rate 11.3% (9.5% - 15.0%)

Contingent consideration

$ (127,551 ) Discounted cash flow model Credit loss rate on covered loans 8.5% (0.0% - 100.0%)
Risk premium component
of discount rate 5.0%

Loans held-in-portfolio

$ 76,619 [1 ] External appraisal Haircut applied on
external appraisals 15.7% (15.0% - 35.0%)

Other real estate owned

$ 15,006 [2 ] External appraisal Haircut applied on
external appraisals 11.6% (5.0% -35.0%)

[1] Loans held-in-portfolio in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.
[2] Other real estate owned in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s collateralized mortgage obligations and interest-only collateralized mortgage obligation (reported as “other”), which are classified in the “trading” category, are yield, constant prepayment rate, and weighted average life. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would

104


Table of Contents

result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the constant prepayment rate will generate a directionally opposite change in the weighted average life. For example, as the average life is reduced by a higher constant prepayment rate, a lower yield will be realized, and when there is a reduction in the constant prepayment rate, the average life of these collateralized mortgage obligations will extend, thus resulting in a higher yield. These particular financial instruments are valued internally by the Corporation’s investment banking and broker-dealer unit utilizing internal valuation techniques. The unobservable inputs incorporated into the internal discounted cash flow models used to derive the fair value of collateralized mortgage obligations and interest-only collateralized mortgage obligation (reported as “other”), which are classified in the “trading” category, are reviewed by the Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit on a quarterly basis. In the case of Level 3 financial instruments which fair value is based on broker quotes, the Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit reviews the inputs used by the broker-dealers for reasonableness utilizing information available from other published sources and validates that the fair value measurements were developed in accordance with ASC Topic 820. The Corporate Treasury unit also substantiates the inputs used by validating the prices with other broker-dealers, whenever possible.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights are constant prepayment rates and discount rates. Increases in interest rates may result in lower prepayments. Discount rates vary according to products and / or portfolios depending on the perceived risk. Increases in discount rates result in a lower fair value measurement. The Corporation’s Corporate Comptroller’s unit is responsible for determining the fair value of MSRs, which is based on discounted cash flow methods based on assumptions developed by an external service provider, except for prepayment speeds, which are adjusted internally for the local market based on historical experience. The Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit validates the economic assumptions developed by the external service provider on a quarterly basis. In addition, an analytical review of prepayment speeds is performed quarterly by the Corporate Comptroller’s unit. Significant variances in prepayment speeds are investigated by the Corporate Treasury unit. The Corporation’s MSR Committee analyzes changes in fair value measurements of MSRs and approves the valuation assumptions at each reporting period. Changes in valuation assumptions must also be approved by the MSR Committee. The fair value of MSRs are compared with those of the external service provider on a quarterly basis in order to validate if the fair values are within the materiality thresholds established by management to monitor and investigate material deviations. Back-testing is performed to compare projected cash flows with actual historical data to ascertain the reasonability of the projected net cash flow results.

105


Table of Contents

Note 28 – Fair value of financial instruments

The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.

The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items.

For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as management’s best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions.

The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate environment at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, as applicable. In different interest rate environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate the value of the Corporation’s fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is, they do not represent the Corporation’s value as a going concern. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation.

Following is a description of the Corporation’s valuation methodologies and inputs used to estimate the fair values for each class of financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value, but for which the fair value is disclosed. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts of the financial instruments disclosed do not represent management’s estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation. For a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used to estimate the fair value for each class of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, refer to Note 27.

Cash and due from banks

Cash and due from banks include cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, and non-interest bearing deposits due from other financial institutions. The carrying amount of cash and due from banks is a reasonable estimate of its fair value. Cash and due from banks are classified as Level 1.

Money market investments

Investments in money market instruments include highly liquid instruments with an average maturity of three months or less. For this reason, they carry a low risk of changes in value as a result of changes in interest rates, and the carrying amount approximates their fair value. Money market investments include federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, and cash balances, including those held at the Federal Reserve. These money market investments are classified as Level 2, except for cash balances which generate interest, including those held at the Federal Reserve, which are classified as Level 1.

Investment securities held-to-maturity

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Municipal bonds include Puerto Rico public municipalities debt and bonds collateralized by second mortgages under the Home Purchase Stimulus Program. Puerto Rico public municipalities debt was valued internally based on benchmark treasury notes and a credit spread derived from comparable Puerto Rico government trades and recent issuances. Puerto Rico public municipalities debt is classified as Level 3. Given that the fair value of municipal bonds collateralized by second mortgages was based on internal yield and prepayment speed assumptions, these municipal bonds are classified as Level 3.

Agency collateralized mortgage obligation: The fair value of the agency collateralized mortgage obligation (“CMO”), which is guaranteed by GNMA, was based on internal yield and prepayment speed assumptions. This agency CMO is classified as Level 3.

Other: Other securities include foreign and corporate debt. Given that the fair value was based on quoted prices for similar instruments, foreign debt is classified as Level 2. The fair value of corporate debt, which is collateralized by municipal bonds of Puerto Rico, was internally derived from benchmark treasury notes and a credit spread based on comparable Puerto Rico government trades, similar securities, and/or recent issuances. Corporate debt is classified as Level 3.

106


Table of Contents

Other investment securities

Federal Home Loan Bank capital stock: Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) capital stock represents an equity interest in the FHLB of New York. It does not have a readily determinable fair value because its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. Since the excess stock is repurchased by the FHLB at its par value, the carrying amount of FHLB capital stock approximates fair value. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 2.

Federal Reserve Bank capital stock: Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) capital stock represents an equity interest in the FRB of New York. It does not have a readily determinable fair value because its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. Since the canceled stock is repurchased by the FRB for the amount of the cash subscription paid, the carrying amount of FRB capital stock approximates fair value. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 2.

Trust preferred securities: These securities represent the equity-method investment in the common stock of these trusts. Book value is the same as fair value for these securities since the fair value of the junior subordinated debentures is the same amount as the fair value of the trust preferred securities issued to the public. The equity-method investment in the common stock of these trusts is classified as Level 2, except for that of Popular Capital Trust III (Troubled Asset Relief Program) which is classified as Level 3. Refer to Note 20 for additional information on these trust preferred securities.

Other investments: Other investments include private equity method investments and Visa Class B common stock held by the Corporation. Since there are no observable market values, private equity method investments are classified as Level 3. The Visa Class B common stock was priced by applying the quoted price of Visa Class A common stock, net of a liquidity adjustment, to the as converted number of Class A common shares since these Class B common shares are restricted and not convertible to Class A common shares until pending litigation is resolved. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 3.

Loans held-for-sale

The fair value of certain impaired loans held-for-sale was based on a discounted cash flow model that assumes that no principal payments are received prior to the effective average maturity date, that the outstanding unpaid principal balance is reduced by a monthly net loss rate, and that the remaining unpaid principal balance is received as a lump sum principal payment at the effective average maturity date. The remaining unpaid principal balance expected to be received, which is based on the prior 12-month cash payment experience of these loans and their expected collateral recovery, was discounted using the interest rate currently offered to clients for the origination of comparable loans. These loans were classified as Level 3. As of June 30, 2014, no loans were valued under this methodology. For loans held-for-sale originated with the intent to sell in the secondary market, its fair value was determined using similar characteristics of loans and secondary market prices assuming the conversion to mortgage-backed securities. Given that the valuation methodology uses internal assumptions based on loan level data, these loans are classified as Level 3. The fair value of certain other loans held-for-sale is based on bids received from potential buyers; binding offers; or external appraisals, net of internal adjustments and estimated costs to sell. Loans held-for-sale based on binding offers are classified as Level 2. Loans held-for-sale based on indicative offers and/or external appraisals are classified as Level 3.

Loans held-in-portfolio

The fair values of the loans held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential mortgage, consumer, and credit cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan characteristics, including interest rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, fair values were estimated based on an exit price by discounting expected cash flows for the segmented groups of loans using a discount rate that considers interest, credit and expected return by market participant under current market conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery assumptions have been applied in the mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore it is included in the loans total at its carrying amount. Loans held-in-portfolio are classified as Level 3.

107


Table of Contents

FDIC loss share asset

Fair value of the FDIC loss share asset was estimated using projected net losses related to the loss sharing agreements, which are expected to be reimbursed by the FDIC. The projected net losses were discounted using the U.S. Government agency curve. The loss share asset is classified as Level 3.

Deposits

Demand deposits: The fair value of demand deposits, which have no stated maturity, was calculated based on the amount payable on demand as of the respective dates. These demand deposits include non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts. Thus, these deposits are classified as Level 2.

Time deposits: The fair value of time deposits was calculated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on time deposits with similar maturities. The non-performance risk was determined using internally-developed models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts insured, the remaining term, and the credit premium of the institution. For certain 5-year certificates of deposit in which customers may withdraw their money anytime with no penalties or charges, the fair value of these certificates of deposit incorporate an early cancellation estimate based on historical experience. Time deposits are classified as Level 2.

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (structured and non-structured): Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with short-term maturities approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of those instruments. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities were valued using discounted cash flows based on the three-month LIBOR. In determining the non-performance credit risk valuation adjustment, the collateralization levels of these long-term securities sold under agreements to repurchase were considered. In the case of callable structured repurchase agreements, the callable feature is not considered when determining the fair value of those repurchase agreements, since there is a remote possibility, based on forward rates, that the investor will call back these agreements before maturity since it is not expected that the interest rates would rise more than the specified interest rate of these agreements. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (structured and non-structured) are classified as Level 2.

Other short-term borrowings

The carrying amount of other short-term borrowings approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Thus, these other short-term borrowings are classified as Level 2.

Notes payable

FHLB advances: The fair value of FHLB advances was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows over their contractual term. In determining the non-performance credit risk valuation adjustment, the collateralization levels of these advances were considered. These advances are classified as Level 2.

Medium-term notes: The fair value of publicly-traded medium-term notes was determined using recent trades of similar transactions. Publicly-traded medium-term notes are classified as Level 2. The fair value of non-publicly traded debt was based on remaining contractual cash outflows, discounted at a rate commensurate with the non-performance credit risk of the Corporation, which is subjective in nature. Non-publicly traded debt is classified as Level 3.

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities): The fair value of junior subordinated interest debentures was determined using recent trades of similar transactions. Thus, these junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures are classified as Level 2.

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (Troubled Asset Relief Program): The fair value of junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows over their contractual term. The discount rate was based on the rate at which a similar security was priced in the open market. Thus, these junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures are classified as Level 3.

108


Table of Contents
Others: The other category includes capital lease obligations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of capital lease obligations, therefore; it is included at its carrying amount. Capital lease obligations are classified as Level 3.

Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit

Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. Since the fair value of commitments to extend credit varies depending on the undrawn amount of the credit facility, fees are subject to constant change, and cash flows are dependent on the creditworthiness of borrowers, commitments to extend credit are classified as Level 3. The fair value of letters of credit was based on fees currently charged on similar agreements. Given that the fair value of letters of credit constantly vary due to fees being subject to constant change and whether the fees are received depends on the creditworthiness of the account parties, letters of credit are classified as Level 3.

The following tables present the carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments with their corresponding level in the fair value hierarchy.

June 30, 2014
Carrying

(In thousands)

amount Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Financial Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 362,572 $ 362,572 $ $ $ 362,572

Money market investments

1,666,944 1,474,592 192,352 1,666,944

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives [1]

345,796 335,217 10,579 345,796

Investment securities available-for-sale [1]

5,653,992 213 5,647,610 6,169 5,653,992

Investment securities held-to-maturity:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

112,676 101,906 101,906

Collateralized mortgage obligation-federal agency

104 96 96

Other

1,500 1,499 1,499

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 114,280 $ $ 1,499 $ 102,002 $ 103,501

Other investment securities:

FHLB stock

$ 64,021 $ $ 64,021 $ $ 64,021

FRB stock

87,981 87,981 87,981

Trust preferred securities

14,197 13,197 1,000 14,197

Other investments

1,926 4,501 4,501

Total other investment securities

$ 168,125 $ $ 165,199 $ 5,501 $ 170,700

Loans held-for-sale

$ 97,010 $ $ 5,361 $ 94,765 $ 100,126

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC

19,108,978 17,879,517 17,879,517

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

2,637,437 3,127,324 3,127,324

FDIC loss share asset

751,553 627,360 627,360

Mortgage servicing rights

151,951 151,951 151,951

Derivatives

27,586 27,586 27,586

109


Table of Contents
June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Carrying
amount
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Financial Liabilities:

Deposits:

Demand deposits

$ 17,232,379 $ $ 17,232,379 $ $ 17,232,379

Time deposits

7,668,773 7,709,103 7,709,103

Total deposits

$ 24,901,152 $ $ 24,941,482 $ $ 24,941,482

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase:

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 1,407,771 $ $ 1,411,777 $ $ 1,411,777

Structured repurchase agreements

666,905 714,897 714,897

Total assets sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 2,074,676 $ $ 2,126,674 $ $ 2,126,674

Other short-term borrowings [2]

$ 31,200 $ $ 31,200 $ $ 31,200

Notes payable:

FHLB advances

510,514 526,054 526,054

Medium-term notes

682 707 707

Unsecured senior debt securities

450,000 457,313 457,313

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities)

439,800 371,762 371,762

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (Troubled Asset Relief Program)

936,000 936,000 936,000

Others

23,093 23,093 23,093

Total notes payable

$ 2,360,089 $ $ 1,355,129 $ 959,800 $ 2,314,929

Derivatives

$ 25,611 $ $ 25,611 $ $ 25,611

Contingent consideration

$ 127,551 $ $ $ 127,551 $ 127,551

(In thousands)

Notional
amount
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Commitments to extend credit

$ 6,941,925 $ $ $ 1,983 $ 1,983

Letters of credit

52,383 837 837

[1] Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements for the fair value by class of financial asset and its hierarchy level.
[2] Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of short-term borrowings.

December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Carrying
amount
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Financial Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 423,211 $ 423,211 $ $ $ 423,211

Money market investments

858,453 677,033 181,420 858,453

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives [1]

339,660 326,509 13,151 339,660

Investment securities available-for-sale [1]

5,294,800 412 5,287,865 6,523 5,294,800

Investment securities held-to-maturity:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

113,881 94,712 94,712

Collateralized mortgage obligation-federal agency

115 122 122

Other

26,500 1,500 24,354 25,854

110


Table of Contents

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 140,496 $ $ 1,500 $ 119,188 $ 120,688

Other investment securities:

FHLB stock

$ 85,245 $ $ 85,245 $ $ 85,245

FRB stock

80,385 80,385 80,385

Trust preferred securities

14,197 13,197 1,000 14,197

Other investments

1,925 4,699 4,699

Total other investment securities

$ 181,752 $ $ 178,827 $ 5,699 $ 184,526

Loans held-for-sale

$ 110,426 $ $ 3,155 $ 109,405 $ 112,560

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC

21,073,403 19,070,337 19,070,337

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

2,882,335 3,404,128 3,404,128

FDIC loss share asset

948,608 837,131 837,131

Mortgage servicing rights

161,099 161,099 161,099

Derivatives

34,793 34,793 34,793
December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Carrying
amount
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Financial Liabilities:

Deposits:

Demand deposits

$ 18,399,793 $ $ 18,399,793 $ $ 18,399,793

Time deposits

8,311,352 8,367,410 8,367,410

Total deposits

$ 26,711,145 $ $ 26,767,203 $ $ 26,767,203

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase:

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 1,021,102 $ $ 1,025,628 $ $ 1,025,628

Structured repurchase agreements

638,190 694,422 694,422

Total assets sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 1,659,292 $ $ 1,720,050 $ $ 1,720,050

Other short-term borrowings [2]

$ 401,200 $ $ 401,200 $ $ 401,200

Notes payable:

FHLB advances

589,229 604,976 604,976

Medium-term notes

689 716 716

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities)

439,800 348,222 348,222

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (Troubled Asset Relief Program)

531,540 1,006,638 1,006,638

Others

23,496 23,496 23,496

Total notes payable

$ 1,584,754 $ $ 953,198 $ 1,030,850 $ 1,984,048

Derivatives

$ 32,378 $ $ 32,378 $ $ 32,378

Contingent consideration

$ 128,299 $ $ $ 128,299 $ 128,299

(In thousands)

Notional
amount
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Commitments to extend credit

$ 7,490,927 $ $ $ 2,571 $ 2,571

Letters of credit

82,007 901 901

[1] Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements for the fair value by class of financial asset and its hierarchy level.
[2] Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of short-term borrowings.

111


Table of Contents

Note 29 – Net (loss) income per common share

The following table sets forth the computation of net (loss) income per common share (“EPS”), basic and diluted, for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands, except per share information)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Net (loss) income from continuing operations

$ (329,585 ) $ 312,170 $ (263,081 ) $ 182,127

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

(181,729 ) 15,298 (161,824 ) 25,034

Preferred stock dividends

(931 ) (931 ) (1,862 ) (1,861 )

Deemed dividend on preferred stock

Net (loss) income applicable to common stock

$ (512,245 ) $ 326,537 $ (426,767 ) $ 205,300

Average common shares outstanding

102,781,438 102,620,295 102,790,545 102,642,329

Average potential dilutive common shares

297,052 315,407

Average common shares outstanding— assuming dilution

102,781,438 102,917,347 102,790,545 102,957,736

Basic EPS from continuing operations

$ (3.21 ) $ 3.03 $ (2.58 ) $ 1.76

Basic EPS from discontinued operations

$ (1.77 ) $ 0.15 $ (1.57 ) $ 0.24

Total Basic EPS

$ (4.98 ) $ 3.18 $ (4.15 ) $ 2.00

Diluted EPS from continuing operations

$ (3.21 ) $ 3.02 $ (2.58 ) $ 1.75

Diluted EPS from discontinued operations

$ (1.77 ) $ 0.15 $ (1.57 ) $ 0.24

Total Diluted EPS

$ (4.98 ) $ 3.17 $ (4.15 ) $ 1.99

Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Warrants, stock options, and restricted stock awards that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect in earnings per common share.

For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, there were 44,797 and 45,621 weighted average antidilutive stock options outstanding, respectively (June 30, 2013 – 103,291 and 104,266). Additionally as of June 30, 2014, the Corporation had outstanding a warrant issued to the U.S. Treasury to purchase 2,093,284 shares of common stock, which had an antidilutive effect at June 30, 2014. As discussed in Note 21, Stockholder’s Equity, this warrant was repurchased on July 23, 2014. Also for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation has 518,976 unvested restricted stocks outstanding that were antidilutive.

112


Table of Contents

Note 30 – Other service fees

The caption of other services fees in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following major categories:

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Debit card fees

$ 11,000 $ 10,395 $ 21,544 $ 20,460

Insurance fees

12,406 11,550 24,125 23,157

Credit card fees

16,985 16,265 33,068 31,819

Sale and administration of investment products

7,456 10,243 13,913 18,960

Trust fees

4,566 4,154 9,029 8,612

Other fees

4,055 4,672 7,607 9,215

Total other services fees

$ 56,468 $ 57,279 $ 109,286 $ 112,223

113


Table of Contents

Note 31 – FDIC loss share (expense) income

The caption of FDIC loss share (expense) income in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following major categories:

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

$ (72,095 ) $ (38,557 ) $ (121,041 ) $ (78,761 )

80% mirror accounting on credit impairment losses [1]

10,372 25,338 25,462 39,383

80% mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses

11,085 12,131 23,830 19,914

80% mirror accounting on recoveries on covered assets, including rental income on OREOs, subject to reimbursement to the FDIC

(3,557 ) (2,168 ) (7,949 ) (3,269 )

80% mirror accounting on amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments

(193 ) (386 )

Change in true-up payment obligation

(1,206 ) (476 ) (38 ) (7,251 )

Other

140 170 269 349

Total FDIC loss share (expense) income

$ (55,261 ) $ (3,755 ) $ (79,467 ) $ (30,021 )

[1] Reductions in expected cash flows for ASC 310-30 loans, which may impact the provision for loan losses, may consider reductions in both principal and interest cash flow expectations. The amount covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements for interest not collected from borrowers is limited under the agreements (approximately 90 days); accordingly, these amounts are not subject fully to the 80% mirror accounting.

During the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation revised its analysis of expected cash flows which resulted in a net decrease of approximately $102.9 million in estimated credit losses, which was driven mainly by commercial loan pools. Though this will have a positive impact on the Corporation’s interest accretion in future periods, the carrying value of the indemnification asset was amortized to reflect lower levels of expected losses. This amortization is recognized over the shorter of the remaining life of the loan pools, which had an average life of approximately six years, or the indemnification asset, which as of June 30, 2014 is one year for commercial, construction and consumer loans and of six years for single-family residential mortgage loans.

114


Table of Contents

Note 32 – Pension and postretirement benefits

The Corporation has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan and supplementary pension benefit restoration plans for regular employees of certain of its subsidiaries. The accrual of benefits under the plans is frozen to all participants.

The components of net periodic pension cost for the periods presented were as follows:

Pension Plan

Quarters ended June 30,

Benefit Restoration Plans
Quarters ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Interest Cost

$ 7,461 $ 6,966 $ 415 $ 373

Expected return on plan assets

(11,630 ) (10,804 ) (606 ) (542 )

Amortization of net loss

2,018 5,363 108 333

Total net periodic pension cost (benefit)

$ (2,151 ) $ 1,525 $ (83 ) $ 164

Pension Plans Six months
ended June 30,
Benefit Restoration Plans
Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Interest Cost

$ 14,922 $ 13,932 $ 829 $ 746

Expected return on plan assets

(23,261 ) (21,608 ) (1,211 ) (1,083 )

Amortization of net loss

4,036 10,726 216 666

Total net periodic pension cost (benefit)

$ (4,303 ) $ 3,050 $ (166 ) $ 329

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014 the Corporation made a contribution to the benefit restoration plans of $13 thousand. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year 2014 for the pension and benefit restoration plans amount to approximately $51 thousand.

The Corporation also provides certain postretirement health care benefits for retired employees of certain subsidiaries. The table that follows presents the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost.

Postretirement Benefit Plan
Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Service cost

$ 364 $ 564 $ 729 $ 1,128

Interest cost

1,712 1,712 3,423 3,424

Amortization of prior service cost

(950 ) (1,900 )

Amortization of net loss

473 946

Total net periodic postretirement benefit cost

$ 1,126 $ 2,749 $ 2,252 $ 5,498

Contributions made to the postretirement benefit plan for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 amounted to approximately $1.6 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year 2014 for the postretirement benefit plan amount to approximately $6.2 million.

115


Table of Contents

Note 33 – Stock-based compensation

The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the “Stock Option Plan”), which permitted the granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporation’s shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which replaced and superseded the Stock Option Plan. The adoption of the Incentive Plan did not alter the original terms of the grants made under the Stock Option Plan prior to the adoption of the Incentive Plan.

Stock Option Plan

Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. This plan provided for the issuance of Popular, Inc.’s common stock at a price equal to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The Corporation’s policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional 20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of employment due to retirement.

(Not in thousands)

Exercise price per share

Options outstanding Weighted-average
exercise price of
options outstanding
Weighted-average
remaining life of options
outstanding in years
Options exercisable
(fully vested)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
options exercisable

$        272.00

44,797 $ 272.00 0.63 44,797 $ 272.00

There was no intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2014 and 2013.

The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information:

(Not in thousands)

Options Outstanding Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

160,986 $ 222.71

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited

Expired

(60,549 ) 171.42

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

100,437 $ 253.64

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited

Expired

(55,640 ) 238.85

Outstanding at June 30, 2014

44,797 $ 272.00

There was no stock option expense recognized for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Incentive Plan

The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards, Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board). Employees and directors of the Corporation and/or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan.

116


Table of Contents

Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based on the employees’ continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and 10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service. The restricted shares granted consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule vest in two years from grant date.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of management.

(Not in thousands)

Restricted Stock Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value

Non-vested at December 31, 2012

491,223 $ 20.59

Granted

229,131 28.20

Vested

(131,324 ) 31.23

Forfeited

(3,783 ) 24.63

Non-vested at December 31, 2013

585,247 $ 21.16

Granted

235,112 29.56

Vested

(295,267 ) 18.57

Forfeited

(6,116 ) 30.87

Non-vested at June 30, 2014

518,976 $ 26.32

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, 129,329 shares of restricted stock (June 30, 2013 – 125,072) were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan, from which 56,549 shares (June 30, 2013 – 61,245) were awarded to management consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, 235,112 shares of restricted stock (June 30, 2013 – 229,131) were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan, from which 162,332 shares (June 30, 2013 – 165,304) were awarded to management consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recognized $ 1.7 million of restricted stock expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $ 0.3 million (June 30, 2013 - $ 1.3 million, with a tax benefit of $ 0.4 million). For the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recognized $ 3.0 million of restricted stock expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $ 0.5 million (June 30, 2013 - $ 2.5 million, with a tax benefit of $ 0.8 million). For the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, the fair market value of the restricted stock vested was $5.4 million at grant date and $8.6 million at vesting date. This triggers a windfall, net of shortfalls, of $1.2 million of which $0.4 million was recorded as a windfall pool in additional paid in capital. No windfall pool was recorded for the remaining $0.8 million due to the valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards and performance shares to members of management at June 30, 2014 was $ 10.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2 years.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of the Board of Directors:

(Not in thousands)

Restricted Stock Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value

Non-vested at December 31, 2012

$

Granted

20,930 29.43

Vested

(20,930 ) 29.43

Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2013

$

Granted

18,733 30.16

Vested

(18,733 ) 30.16

Forfeited

Non-vested at June 30, 2014

$

117


Table of Contents

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation granted 15,648 shares of restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc., which became vested at grant date (June 30, 2013 – 14,782). During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.1 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of $15 thousand (June 30, 2013 - $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $46 thousand). For the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation granted 18,733 shares of restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc., which became vested at grant date (June 30, 2013 – 17,186). During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.3 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of $29 thousand (June 30, 2013 - $0.2 million, with a tax benefit of $91 thousand). The fair value at vesting date of the restricted stock vested during the six months ended June 30, 2014 for directors was $ 0.6 million.

118


Table of Contents

Note 34 – Income taxes

The reason for the difference between the income tax expense (benefit) applicable to income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico, were as follows:

Quarters ended
June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Amount % of pre-tax
income
Amount % of pre-tax
income

Computed income tax at statutory rates

$ (130,147 ) 39 % $ 29,168 39 %

Net benefit of net tax exempt interest income

(13,558 ) 4 (10,325 ) (14 )

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

(7,211 ) 2 (2,958 ) (4 )

Non-deductible expenses

169,810 (50 ) 7,946 11

Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions

(4,293 ) 1 (2,588 ) (3 )

Initial adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate

(215,600 ) (288 )

Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate [1]

(20,833 ) 6 (47,322 ) (63 )

Others

2,108 (1 ) 4,299 5

Income tax benefit

$ (4,124 ) 1 % $ (237,380 ) (317 )%

[1] For 2014, includes the impact of the Closing Agreement with the P.R. Treasury signed in June 2014.

Six months ended
June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Amount % of pre-tax
income
Amount % of pre-tax
income

Computed income tax at statutory rates

$ (95,138 ) 39 % $ (43,731 ) 39 %

Net benefit of net tax exempt interest income

(24,944 ) 10 (19,876 ) 18

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

(14,183 ) 6 (2,975 ) 3

Non-deductible expenses

178,129 (73 ) 15,759 (14 )

Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions

(10,488 ) 4 (5,948 ) 5

Initial adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate

(197,467 ) 176

Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate [1]

(18,555 ) 8 (45,313 ) 40

Others

4,319 (2 ) 5,294 (5 )

Income tax expense (benefit)

$ 19,140 (8 )% $ (294,257 ) 262 %

[1] For 2014, includes the impact of the Closing Agreement with the P.R. Treasury signed in June 2014.

Income tax benefit amounted to $4.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared with $237.4 million for the same quarter of 2013. The decrease in income tax benefit was primarily due to the recognition during the second quarter of 2013 of $215.6 million in income tax benefit and a corresponding increase in the net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico operations as the result of the increase in the marginal tax rate from 30% to 39% per Act Number 40 of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.

During the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation entered into a Closing Agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury. The Agreement, among other matters, was related to the income tax treatment of certain charge-offs related to the loans acquired from Westernbank as part of the FDIC assisted transaction in the year 2010. As a result of the Closing Agreement, the Corporation recorded a tax benefit of $23.4 million due to a reduction in the deferred tax liability associated with the Westernbank loan portfolio. Additionally, in connection with this Closing Agreement, the Corporation made an estimated tax payment of $45 million which will be used as a credit to offset future income tax liabilities. This benefit was partially offset by the negative impact of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $9.2 million recorded at the Holding Company, due to the difference in the tax treatment of the interest expense related to the TARP funds and the newly issued senior notes as explained below.

119


Table of Contents

Income tax expense amounted to $19.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared with an income tax benefit of $294.3 million for the same period of 2013. The increase in income tax expense was primarily due to the recognition during the year 2013 of a tax benefit and a corresponding increase in the net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico operations as result of the increase in the marginal tax rate from 30% to 39% as mention above. In addition, during 2013 the income tax benefit increased due to the loss generated on the Puerto Rico operations by the sale of non-performing assets net of the gain realized on the sale of EVERTEC’s common stocks.

On July 1, 2014, the Government of Puerto Rico approved an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, which among other things, changed the income tax rate for capital gains from 15% to 20%. As a result, the Corporation expects to recognize an income tax expense of approximately $20.0 million during the third quarter of 2014, mainly related to the deferred tax liability associated with the portfolio acquired from Westernbank.

The following table presents the components of the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013

Deferred tax assets:

Tax credits available for carryforward

$ 8,691 $ 8,195

Net operating loss and other carryforward available

1,248,497 1,269,523

Postretirement and pension benefits

47,578 51,742

Deferred loan origination fees

7,059 7,718

Allowance for loan losses

744,261 760,956

Deferred gains

8,695 9,313

Accelerated depreciation

7,753 7,577

Intercompany deferred gains

3,074 3,235

Other temporary differences

35,481 34,443

Total gross deferred tax assets

2,111,089 2,152,702

Deferred tax liabilities:

Differences between the assigned values and the tax basis of assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations

35,391 37,938

Difference in outside basis between financial and tax reporting on sale of a business

407 349

FDIC-assisted transaction

60,981 79,381

Unrealized net gain on trading and available-for-sale securities

20,760 3,822

Deferred loan origination costs

143 554

Other temporary differences

15,190 13,038

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

132,872 135,082

Valuation allowance

1,224,806 1,257,977

Net deferred tax asset

$ 753,411 $ 759,643

The net deferred tax asset shown in the table above at June 30, 2014 is reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition as $789 million in net deferred tax assets in the “Other assets” caption (December 31, 2013 - $762 million) and $35 million in deferred tax liabilities in the “Other liabilities” caption (December 31, 2013 - $2 million), reflecting the aggregate deferred tax assets or liabilities of individual tax-paying subsidiaries of the Corporation.

A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available evidence, including both positive and

120


Table of Contents

negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The analysis considers all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies.

The Corporation recorded a valuation allowance in the year 2008 since in consideration of the requirement of ASC 740 management considered that it is more likely than not that all of the U.S. operation deferred tax asset will not be realized. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets in the U.S. mainland management evaluates and weights all available positive and negative evidence. The Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations is not in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended June 30, 2014 taking into account taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences. This represents positive evidence within management’s evaluation. The book income for 2013 and the first six months of 2014 was significantly impacted by a reversal of the loan loss provision due to the improved credit quality of the loan portfolios. However, the U.S. mainland operations did not report taxable income for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013. Future realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character within the carryforward period available under the tax law. The lack of taxable income together with the uncertainties regarding future performance represents strong negative evidence within management’s evaluation. This determination should be updated each quarter and adjusted as any changes arise. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets related to the U.S. mainland operations, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s net deferred tax asset related to its Puerto Rico operations amounted to $785 million net of the valuation allowance of $9.2 million recorded in the Holding Company.

The Corporation’s Puerto Rico Banking operation is not in a cumulative loss position and has sustained profitability for the three year period ended June 30, 2014, exclusive of the loss generated on the sales of non-performing assets that took place in 2013 which is not a continuing condition of the operations. This is considered a strong piece of objectively verifiable positive evidence that out weights any negative evidence considered by management in the evaluation of the realization of the deferred tax asset. Based on this evidence and management’s estimate of future taxable income, the Corporation has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico Banking operations will be realized.

The Holding Company operation is not in a cumulative loss position for the three year period ended June 30, 2014. However, after the payment of TARP, the interest expense that will be paid on the newly issued $450 million subordinated notes, bearing interest at 7%, will be tax deductible, contrary to the interest expense payable on the note issued to the U.S. Treasury under TARP. Based on this new fact pattern the Holding Company is expecting to have losses for income tax purposes exclusive of reversing temporary differences. Since as required by ASC 740 the historical information should be supplemented by all currently available information about future years, the expected losses in future years is considered by management a strong negative evidence that will suggest that income in future years will be insufficient to support the realization of all deferred tax asset. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Holding Company will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset of $9.2 million was recorded during the second quarter of 2014.

The reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:

(In millions)

2014 2013

Balance at January 1

$ 9.8 $ 13.4

Additions for tax positions—January through March

0.3 0.2

Balance at March 31

$ 10.1 $ 13.6

Additions for tax positions—April through June

0.2 0.3

Balance at June 30

$ 10.3 $ 13.9

At June 30, 2014, the total amount of interest recognized in the statement of financial condition approximated $4.0 million (December 31, 2013 - $3.6 million). The total interest expense recognized at June 2014 was $425 thousand (December 31, 2013 - $1.4 million). Management determined that at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 there was no need to accrue for the payment of penalties. The Corporation’s policy is to report interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, while the penalties, if any, are reported in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

121


Table of Contents

After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico, that if recognized, would affect the Corporation’s effective tax rate, was approximately $12.8 million at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $11.9 million).

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statutes of limitation, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.

The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. At June 30, 2014, the following years remain subject to examination in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction: 2010 and thereafter; and in the Puerto Rico jurisdiction, 2009 and thereafter. The Corporation anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, which could amount to approximately $7.8 million.

122


Table of Contents

Note 35 – Supplemental disclosure on the consolidated statements of cash flows

Additional disclosures on cash flow information and non-cash activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 are listed in the following table:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Non-cash activities:

Loans transferred to other real estate

$ 82,338 $ 143,159

Loans transferred to other property

20,492 16,009

Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets

102,830 159,168

Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale

1,868,420 438,640

Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans held-in-portfolio

3,245 21,580

Loans securitized into investment securities [1]

472,891 846,327

Trades receivable from brokers and counterparties [2]

519,495 158,141

Trades payable to brokers and counterparties

45,893 72,007

Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on securitizations or asset transfers

6,692 10,152

Loans sold to a joint venture in exchange for an acquisition loan and an equity interest in the joint venture

194,514

[1] Includes loans securitized into trading securities and subsequently sold before quarter end.
[2] Includes $441 million of trades receivable as of June 30,2014, related to the issuance of $450 million in Senior Notes, which settled on July 1, 2014, net of debt issuance costs of $9 million.

123


Table of Contents

Note 36 – Segment reporting

The Corporation’s corporate structure consists of two reportable segments – Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. These reportable segments pertain only to the continuing operations of Popular, Inc. As previously indicated in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida were classified as discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2014.

Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on the products and services offered by the segments.

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:

Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporation’s results of operations and total assets at June 30, 2014, additional disclosures are provided for the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:

Commercial banking represents the Corporation’s banking operations conducted at BPPR, which are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR.

Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally on residential mortgage loan originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR.

Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries generate profits based on fee income.

Banco Popular North America:

Banco Popular North America’s reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA, E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. BPNA operates through a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland under the name of Popular Community Bank, while E-LOAN supports BPNA’s deposit gathering through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth quarter of 2008. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. also holds a running-off loan portfolio as this subsidiary ceased originating loans during 2009. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment and insurance services across the BPNA branch network.

The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North America, Popular International Bank and certain of the Corporation’s investments accounted for under the equity method, including EVERTEC and Centro Financiero BHD, S.A. The Corporate group also includes the expenses of certain corporate areas that are identified as critical to the organization: Finance, Risk Management and Legal.

The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates, resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.

124


Table of Contents

The tables that follow present the results of operations and total assets by reportable segments:

2014

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Banco Popular Banco Popular Intersegment

(In thousands)

de Puerto Rico North America Eliminations

Net interest income

$ 334,079 $ 48,688 $

Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses

86,432 (24,786 )

Non-interest income

38,505 18,187

Amortization of intangibles

1,822 203

Depreciation expense

9,824 1,663

Other operating expenses

211,206 38,010

Income tax (benefit) expense

(7,958 ) 846

Net income

$ 71,258 $ 50,939 $

Segment assets

$ 27,646,859 $ 6,470,550 $ (18,199 )

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Reportable

(In thousands)

Segments Corporate Eliminations Total Popular, Inc.

Net interest income (expense)

$ 382,767 $ (442,148 ) $ $ (59,381 )

Provision for loan losses

61,646 32 61,678

Non-interest income

56,692 7,348 (1,251 ) 62,789

Amortization of intangibles

2,025 2,025

Depreciation expense

11,487 168 11,655

Other operating expenses

249,216 13,226 (683 ) 261,759

Income tax (benefit) expense

(7,112 ) 3,209 (221 ) (4,124 )

Net income (loss)

$ 122,197 $ (451,435 ) $ (347 ) $ (329,585 )

Segment assets

$ 34,099,210 $ 5,864,130 $ (5,203,820 ) $ 34,759,520

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

Banco Popular Banco Popular Intersegment

(In thousands)

de Puerto Rico North America Eliminations

Net interest income

$ 661,949 $ 100,119 $

Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses

166,269 (24,579 )

Non-interest income

106,594 28,789

Amortization of intangibles

3,646 405

Depreciation expense

19,322 3,384

Other operating expenses

421,045 76,002

Income tax expense

21,985 1,692

Net income

$ 136,276 $ 72,004 $

Segment assets

$ 27,646,859 $ 6,470,550 $ (18,199 )

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

Reportable

(In thousands)

Segments Corporate Eliminations Total Popular, Inc.

Net interest income (expense)

$ 762,068 $ (470,278 ) $ $ 291,790

Provision for loan losses

141,690 (176 ) 141,514

Non-interest income

135,383 24,756 (1,318 ) 158,821

Amortization of intangibles

4,051 4,051

Depreciation expense

22,706 325 23,031

Other operating expenses

497,047 30,302 (1,393 ) 525,956

Income tax expense (benefit)

23,677 (4,567 ) 30 19,140

Net income (loss)

$ 208,280 $ (471,406 ) $ 45 $ (263,081 )

Segment assets

$ 34,099,210 $ 5,864,130 $ (5,203,820 ) $ 34,759,520

125


Table of Contents

2013

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

Banco Popular Banco Popular Intersegment

(In thousands)

de Puerto Rico North America Eliminations

Net interest income

$ 314,748 $ 46,527 $

Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses

255,944 (1,489 )

Non-interest income

103,331 8,108

Amortization of intangibles

1,787 202

Depreciation expense

10,306 2,023

Other operating expenses

225,726 37,518

Income tax (benefit) expense

(235,766 ) 936

Net income

$ 160,082 $ 15,445 $

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

Reportable

(In thousands)

Segments Corporate Eliminations Total Popular, Inc.

Net interest income (expense)

$ 361,275 $ (26,864 ) $ $ 334,411

Provision for loan losses

254,455 20 254,475

Non-interest income

111,439 178,614 (1,335 ) 288,718

Amortization of intangibles

1,989 1,989

Depreciation expense

12,329 162 12,491

Other operating expenses

263,244 16,830 (690 ) 279,384

Income tax benefit

(234,830 ) (2,258 ) (292 ) (237,380 )

Net income

$ 175,527 $ 136,996 $ (353 ) $ 312,170

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

Banco Popular Banco Popular Intersegment

(In thousands)

de Puerto Rico North America Eliminations

Net interest income

$ 619,776 $ 92,876 $

Provision for loan losses

477,829 3,315

Non-interest income

119,708 14,432

Amortization of intangibles

3,575 404

Depreciation expense

20,072 4,076

Other operating expenses

475,361 74,642

Income tax (benefit) expense

(288,631 ) 1,872

Net income

$ 51,278 $ 22,999 $

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

Reportable

(In thousands)

Segments Corporate Eliminations Total Popular, Inc.

Net interest income (expense)

$ 712,652 $ (53,597 ) $ $ 659,055

Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses

481,144 (20 ) 481,124

Non-interest income

134,140 186,286 (1,398 ) 319,028

Amortization of intangibles

3,979 3,979

Depreciation expense

24,148 325 24,473

Other operating expenses

550,003 32,002 (1,368 ) 580,637

Income tax benefit

(286,759 ) (7,391 ) (107 ) (294,257 )

Net income

$ 74,277 $ 107,773 $ 77 $ 182,127

126


Table of Contents

Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment are as follows:

2014

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

Consumer Other Total Banco
Commercial and Retail Financial Popular de

(In thousands)

Banking Banking Services Eliminations Puerto Rico

Net interest income

$ 139,906 $ 192,019 $ 2,154 $ $ 334,079

Provision for loan losses

76,879 9,553 86,432

Non-interest income

(14,141 ) 28,415 24,249 (18 ) 38,505

Amortization of intangibles

1 1,709 112 1,822

Depreciation expense

4,124 5,418 282 9,824

Other operating expenses

58,326 136,619 16,279 (18 ) 211,206

Income tax (benefit) expense

(16,090 ) 4,774 3,358 (7,958 )

Net income

$ 2,525 $ 62,361 $ 6,372 $ $ 71,258

Segment assets

$ 10,547,131 $ 18,538,311 $ 819,396 $ (2,257,979 ) $ 27,646,859

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

Consumer Other Total Banco
Commercial and Retail Financial Popular de

(In thousands)

Banking Banking Services Eliminations Puerto Rico

Net interest income

$ 276,366 $ 380,696 $ 4,887 $ $ 661,949

Provision for loan losses

108,068 58,201 166,269

Non-interest (expense) income

(6,457 ) 66,394 46,693 (36 ) 106,594

Amortization of intangibles

2 3,418 226 3,646

Depreciation expense

8,023 10,730 569 19,322

Other operating expenses

114,765 274,220 32,096 (36 ) 421,045

Income tax expense

1,918 13,602 6,465 21,985

Net income

$ 37,133 $ 86,919 $ 12,224 $ $ 136,276

Segment assets

$ 10,547,131 $ 18,538,311 $ 819,396 $ (2,257,979 ) $ 27,646,859

2013

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

Consumer Other Total Banco
Commercial and Retail Financial Popular de

(In thousands)

Banking Banking Services Eliminations Puerto Rico

Net interest income

$ 118,716 $ 193,548 $ 2,484 $ $ 314,748

Provision for loan losses

(6,161 ) 262,105 255,944

Non-interest income

19,743 56,218 27,389 (19 ) 103,331

Amortization of intangibles

1 1,710 76 1,787

Depreciation expense

4,864 5,123 319 10,306

Other operating expenses

68,463 139,592 17,690 (19 ) 225,726

Income tax (benefit) expense

(36,883 ) (202,573 ) 3,690 (235,766 )

Net income

$ 108,175 $ 43,809 $ 8,098 $ $ 160,082

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

Consumer Other Total Banco
Commercial and Retail Financial Popular de

(In thousands)

Banking Banking Services Eliminations Puerto Rico

Net interest income

$ 232,519 $ 382,701 $ 4,556 $ $ 619,776

Provision for loan losses

139,612 338,217 477,829

Non-interest (expense) income

(45,484 ) 114,436 50,791 (35 ) 119,708

Amortization of intangibles

2 3,419 154 3,575

Depreciation expense

8,840 10,614 618 20,072

Other operating expenses

147,296 293,877 34,223 (35 ) 475,361

Income tax (benefit) expense

(92,534 ) (201,895 ) 5,798 (288,631 )

Net (loss) income

$ (16,181 ) $ 52,905 $ 14,554 $ $ 51,278

127


Table of Contents

Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular North America reportable segments are as follows:

2014

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Banco Popular North America

(In thousands)

Banco Popular
North America
E-LOAN Eliminations Total Banco
Popular North
America

Net interest income

$ 47,966 $ 722 $ $ 48,688

(Reversal of) provision for loan losses

(21,759 ) (3,027 ) (24,786 )

Non-interest income

16,772 1,415 18,187

Amortization of intangibles

203 203

Depreciation expense

1,663 1,663

Other operating expenses

37,339 671 38,010

Income tax expense

846 846

Net income

$ 46,446 $ 4,493 $ $ 50,939

Segment assets

$ 7,194,210 $ 279,938 $ (1,003,598 ) $ 6,470,550

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

Banco Popular North America

(In thousands)

Banco Popular
North America
E-LOAN Eliminations Total Banco
Popular North
America

Net interest income

$ 98,712 $ 1,407 $ $ 100,119

(Reversal of provision) provision for loan losses

(21,767 ) (2,812 ) (24,579 )

Non-interest income

27,265 1,524 28,789

Amortization of intangibles

405 405

Depreciation expense

3,384 3,384

Other operating expenses

74,797 1,205 76,002

Income tax expense (benefit)

1,692 1,692

Net income (loss)

$ 67,466 $ 4,538 $ $ 72,004

Segment assets

$ 7,194,210 $ 279,938 $ (1,003,598 ) $ 6,470,550

2013

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013

Banco Popular North America

(In thousands)

Banco Popular
North America
E-LOAN Eliminations Total Banco
Popular North
America

Net interest income

$ 45,780 $ 747 $ $ 46,527

Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses

(6,262 ) 4,773 (1,489 )

Non-interest income (expense)

8,668 (560 ) 8,108

Amortization of intangibles

202 202

Depreciation expense

2,023 2,023

Other operating expenses

36,929 589 37,518

Income tax expense

936 936

Net income (loss)

$ 20,620 $ (5,175 ) $ $ 15,445

128


Table of Contents

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

Banco Popular North America

(In thousands)

Banco Popular
North America
E-LOAN Eliminations Total Banco
Popular North
America

Net interest income

$ 91,228 $ 1,648 $ $ 92,876

(Reversal of provision) provision for loan losses

(1,187 ) 4,502 3,315

Non-interest income

16,130 (1,698 ) 14,432

Amortization of intangibles

404 404

Depreciation expense

4,076 4,076

Other operating expenses

73,374 1,268 74,642

Income tax expense

1,872 1,872

Net income (loss)

$ 28,819 $ (5,820 ) $ $ 22,999

Geographic Information

Quarter ended Six months ended

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Revenues: [1]

Puerto Rico

$ (80,277 ) $ 551,826 $ 276,760 $ 837,640

United States

64,992 50,228 127,475 100,451

Other

18,693 21,075 46,376 39,992

Total consolidated revenues

$ 3,408 $ 623,129 $ 450,611 $ 978,083

[1] Total revenues include net interest income (expense), service charges on deposit accounts, other service fees, mortgage banking activities, net gain (loss) and valuation adjustments on investment securities, trading account (loss) profit, net (loss) gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans sold, FDIC loss share (expense) income and other operating income. For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, Puerto Rico recorded net interest expense of $119 million, which included the accelerated discount amortization of $414.1 million related to TARP funds.

Selected Balance Sheet Information:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Puerto Rico

Total assets

$ 26,906,427 $ 25,714,758

Loans

17,779,141 18,107,764

Deposits

20,075,901 19,730,408

United States

Total assets

$ 8,526,806 $ 8,897,535

Loans

3,921,512 5,839,115

Deposits

3,802,948 6,007,159

Other

Total assets

$ 1,154,669 $ 1,137,040

Loans

767,683 759,840

Deposits [1]

1,022,303 973,578

[1] Represents deposits from BPPR operations located in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands.

129


Table of Contents

Note 37 – Subsequent events

Subsequent events are events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. The effects of subsequent events and transactions are recognized in the financial statements when they provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date. The Corporation has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to June 30, 2014.

On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury through the repurchase of $935 million of trust capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Corporation funded the repurchase through a combination of available cash and approximately $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019 which settled on July 1, 2014.

On July 23, 2014, the Corporation also completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008 for a repurchase price of $3 million. The warrant represented the right to purchase 2,093,284 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $67 per share with an original term of 10 years. With the completion of this transaction, the Corporation completed its exit from the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

In connection with the repayment of TARP on July 2, 2014, the Corporation accelerated the related amortization of the $414.1 million of discount and deferred costs during the second quarter of 2014, related to the repayment of TARP funds, which is reflected as part of interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

On July 1, 2014, the Government of Puerto Rico approved an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, which, among other things, changed the income tax rate for capital gains from 15% to 20%. As a result, the Corporation expects to recognize an income tax expense of approximately $20.0 million during the third quarter of 2014, mainly related to the deferred tax liability associated with the portfolio acquired from Westernbank.

130


Table of Contents

Note 38 – Condensed consolidating financial information of guarantor and issuers of registered guaranteed securities

The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position of Popular, Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) (parent only), Popular North America, Inc. (“PNA”) and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the results of their operations and cash flows for periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

PNA is an operating, wholly-owned subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Equity One, Inc. and Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including BPNA’s wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc.

PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA.

Popular International Bank, Inc. (“PIBI”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular Insurance V.I., Inc. In July 2013, the Corporation completed the sale of Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, C.A., which was a wholly owned subsidiary of PIBI.

A potential source of income for PIHC consists of dividends from BPPR and BPNA. Under existing federal banking regulations any dividend from BPPR or BPNA to the PIHC could be made if the total of all dividends declared by each entity during the calendar year would not exceed the total of its net income for that year, as defined by the Federal Reserve Board, combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. At June 30, 2014, BPPR could have declared a dividend of approximately $452 million (December 31, 2013 - $504 million). However, on July 25, 2011, PIHC and BPPR entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico that requires the approval of these entities prior to the payment of any dividends by BPPR to PIHC. BPNA could not declare any dividends without the approval of the Federal Reserve Board.

131


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Condition (Unaudited)

At June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Popular Inc.
Holding Co.
PNA Holding
Co.
All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
Elimination
entries
Popular, Inc.
Consolidated

Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 1,253 $ 612 $ 363,424 $ (2,717 ) $ 362,572

Money market investments

19,734 599 1,648,210 (1,599 ) 1,666,944

Trading account securities, at fair value

1,577 344,246 345,823

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

213 5,653,779 5,653,992

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost

114,280 114,280

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value

10,850 4,492 152,783 168,125

Investment in subsidiaries

4,846,021 1,348,018 (6,194,039 )

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

97,010 97,010

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

588,241 19,724,436 (586,443 ) 19,726,234

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

2,736,102 2,736,102

Less—Unearned income

91,010 91,010

Allowance for loan losses

37 624,874 624,911

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

588,204 21,744,654 (586,443 ) 21,746,415

FDIC loss share asset

751,553 751,553

Premises and equipment, net

2,139 490,243 492,382

Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

139,420 139,420

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

155,805 155,805

Accrued income receivable

132 112 119,348 (72 ) 119,520

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

151,951 151,951

Other assets

506,637 25,815 1,775,648 (15,740 ) 2,292,360

Goodwill

461,247 (1 ) 461,246

Other intangible assets

554 39,568 40,122

Assets from discontinued operations

1,828,382 1,828,382

Total assets

$ 5,977,314 $ 1,379,648 $ 36,031,551 $ (6,800,611 ) $ 36,587,902

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing

$ $ $ 5,669,402 $ ($2,717 ) $ 5,666,685

Interest bearing

19,236,066 ($1,599 ) 19,234,467

Total deposits

24,905,468 (4,316 ) 24,901,152

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

2,074,676 2,074,676

Other short-term borrowings

1,443 616,200 (586,443 ) 31,200

Notes payable

1,676,812 149,663 533,614 2,360,089

Other liabilities

40,061 7,219 849,241 (15,919 ) 880,602

Liabilities from discontinued operations

2,079,742 2,079,742

Total liabilities

1,716,873 158,325 31,058,941 (606,678 ) 32,327,461

132


Table of Contents

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock

50,160 50,160

Common stock

1,035 2 56,307 (56,309 ) 1,035

Surplus

4,165,089 4,269,208 5,907,664 (10,168,345 ) 4,173,616

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

176,190 (3,044,262 ) (861,999 ) 3,897,734 167,663

Treasury stock, at cost

(1,742 ) (1,742 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

(130,291 ) (3,625 ) (129,362 ) 132,987 (130,291 )

Total stockholders’ equity

4,260,441 1,221,323 4,972,610 (6,193,933 ) 4,260,441

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 5,977,314 $ 1,379,648 $ 36,031,551 $ (6,800,611 ) $ 36,587,902

133


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Condition

At December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
PNA Holding
Co.
All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
Elimination
entries
Popular, Inc.
Consolidated

Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 10,595 $ 616 $ 422,967 $ (10,967 ) $ 423,211

Money market investments

18,721 4,804 839,732 (4,804 ) 858,453

Trading account securities, at fair value

1,353 338,390 339,743

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

204 5,294,596 5,294,800

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost

140,496 140,496

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value

10,850 4,492 166,410 181,752

Investment in subsidiaries

4,856,566 1,670,809 (6,527,375 )

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

110,426 110,426

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

521,092 21,702,418 (519,500 ) 21,704,010

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

2,984,427 2,984,427

Less—Unearned income

92,144 92,144

Allowance for loan losses

304 640,251 640,555

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

520,788 23,954,450 (519,500 ) 23,955,738

FDIC loss share asset

948,608 948,608

Premises and equipment, net

2,135 517,381 519,516

Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

135,501 135,501

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

168,007 168,007

Accrued income receivable

64 114 131,368 (10 ) 131,536

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

161,099 161,099

Other assets

66,577 19,407 1,642,760 (41,186 ) 1,687,558

Goodwill

647,757 647,757

Other intangible assets

554 44,578 45,132

Total assets

$ 5,488,407 $ 1,700,242 $ 35,664,526 $ (7,103,842 ) $ 35,749,333

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing

$ $ $ 5,933,649 $ ($10,967 ) $ 5,922,682

Interest bearing

20,793,267 ($4,804 ) 20,788,463

Total deposits

26,726,916 (15,771 ) 26,711,145

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

1,659,292 1,659,292

Other short-term borrowings

920,700 (519,500 ) 401,200

Notes payable

822,351 149,663 612,740 1,584,754

Other liabilities

39,906 39,245 728,899 (41,258 ) 766,792

Total liabilities

862,257 188,908 30,648,547 (576,529 ) 31,123,183

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock

50,160 50,160

134


Table of Contents

Common stock

1,034 2 56,079 (56,081 ) 1,034

Surplus

4,161,625 4,479,208 6,056,774 (10,527,455 ) 4,170,152

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

602,957 (2,940,509 ) (907,972 ) 3,839,954 594,430

Treasury stock, at cost

(881 ) (881 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

(188,745 ) (27,367 ) (188,902 ) 216,269 (188,745 )

Total stockholders’ equity

4,626,150 1,511,334 5,015,979 (6,527,313 ) 4,626,150

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 5,488,407 $ 1,700,242 $ 35,664,526 $ (7,103,842 ) $ 35,749,333

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (Unaudited)

Quarter ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
PNA
Holding Co.
All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
Elimination
entries
Popular, Inc.
Consolidated

Interest income:

Loans

$ 498 $ $ 380,966 $ (478 ) $ 380,986

Money market investments

5 2 1,131 (7 ) 1,131

Investment securities

165 81 33,743 33,989

Trading account securities

5,344 5,344

Total interest income

668 83 421,184 (485 ) 421,450

Interest expense:

Deposits

26,226 (3 ) 26,223

Short-term borrowings

89 9,285 (482 ) 8,892

Long-term debt

440,133 2,706 2,877 445,716

Total interest expense

440,133 2,795 38,388 (485 ) 480,831

Net interest (expense) income

(439,465 ) (2,712 ) 382,796 (59,381 )

Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans

32 50,042 50,074

Provision for loan losses- covered loans

11,604 11,604

Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses

(439,497 ) (2,712 ) 321,150 (121,059 )

Service charges on deposit accounts

39,237 39,237

Other service fees

57,719 (1,251 ) 56,468

Mortgage banking activities

3,788 3,788

Net gain and valuation adjustments on

Trading account profit

52 1,003 1,055

Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

9,659 9,659

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

(7,454 ) (7,454 )

FDIC loss share (expense) income

(55,261 ) (55,261 )

Other operating income

3,108 (1,348 ) 13,537 15,297

Total non-interest income (expense)

3,160 (1,348 ) 62,228 (1,251 ) 62,789

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

8,201 90,899 99,100

Net occupancy expenses

1,013 19,254 20,267

Equipment expenses

1,079 10,965 12,044

Other taxes

176 13,367 13,543

Professional fees

2,266 (241 ) 65,053 (54 ) 67,024

Communications

122 6,303 6,425

135


Table of Contents

Business promotion

439 15,599 16,038

FDIC deposit insurance

10,480 10,480

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

3,410 3,410

Other operating expenses

(15,251 ) 108 36,280 (628 ) 20,509

Amortization of intangibles

2,025 2,025

Restructuring cost

4,574 4,574

Total operating expenses

(1,955 ) (133 ) 278,209 (682 ) 275,439

(Loss) income before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries

(434,382 ) (3,927 ) 105,169 (569 ) (333,709 )

Income tax expense (benefit)

8,984 (12,887 ) (221 ) (4,124 )

(Loss) income before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

(443,366 ) (3,927 ) 118,056 (348 ) (329,585 )

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

113,781 47,599 (161,380 )

(Loss) income from continuing operations

(329,585 ) 43,672 118,056 (161,728 ) (329,585 )

Loss from discontinued opeartions, net of tax

(181,729 ) (181,729 )

Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations

(181,729 ) (181,729 ) 363,458

Net loss

$ (511,314 ) $ (138,057 ) $ (63,673 ) $ 201,730 $ (511,314 )

Comprehensive loss, net of tax

$ (485,330 ) $ (125,882 ) $ (37,918 ) $ 163,800 $ (485,330 )

136


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six months ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
PNA
Holding Co.
All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
Elimination
entries
Popular, Inc.
Consolidated

Interest and dividend income:

Loans

1,060 758,547 (1,019 ) 758,588

Money market investments

12 5 2,103 (16 ) 2,104

Investment securities

331 161 68,624 69,116

Trading account securities

10,601 10,601

Total interest and dividend income

1,403 166 839,875 (1,035 ) 840,409

Interest expense:

Deposits

53,086 (5 ) 53,081

Short-term borrowings

306 18,656 (1,030 ) 17,932

Long-term debt

466,187 5,413 6,006 477,606

Total interest expense

466,187 5,719 77,748 (1,035 ) 548,619

Net interest (expense) income

(464,784 ) (5,553 ) 762,127 291,790

Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans

(176 ) 104,372 104,196

Provision for loan losses- covered loans

37,318 37,318

Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses

(464,608 ) (5,553 ) 620,437 150,276

Service charges on deposit accounts

78,596 78,596

Other service fees

110,604 (1,318 ) 109,286

Mortgage banking activities

7,466 7,466

Trading account profit (loss)

73 2,959 3,032

Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

14,052 14,052

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

(17,801 ) (17,801 )

FDIC loss share expense

(79,467 ) (79,467 )

Other operating income

6,509 (687 ) 37,835 43,657

Total non-interest income

6,582 (687 ) 154,244 (1,318 ) 158,821

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

16,510 186,891 203,401

Net occupancy expenses

1,945 39,682 41,627

Equipment expenses

2,020 21,436 23,456

Other taxes

360 26,846 27,206

Professional fees

5,312 763 128,069 (121 ) 134,023

Communications

249 12,861 13,110

Business promotion

850 26,574 27,424

FDIC deposit insurance

21,458 21,458

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

9,850 9,850

Other operating expenses

(29,019 ) 217 72,931 (1,271 ) 42,858

Amortization of intangibles

4,051 4,051

Restructuring costs

4,574 4,574

Total operating expenses

(1,773 ) 980 555,223 (1,392 ) 553,038

(Loss) income before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries

(456,253 ) (7,220 ) 219,458 74 (243,941 )

Income tax expense (benefit)

8,150 10,960 30 19,140

(Loss) income before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

(464,403 ) (7,220 ) 208,498 44 (263,081 )

137


Table of Contents

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

201,322 65,291 (266,613 )

(Loss) income from continuing operations

(263,081 ) 58,071 208,498 (266,569 ) (263,081 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

(161,824 ) (161,824 )

Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations

(161,824 ) (161,824 ) 323,648

Net (loss) income

$ (424,905 ) $ (103,753 ) $ 46,674 $ 57,079 $ (424,905 )

Comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

$ (366,451 ) $ (80,011 ) $ 106,214 $ (26,203 ) $ (366,451 )

138


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (Unaudited)

Quarter ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
PNA
Holding Co.
All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
Elimination
entries
Popular, Inc.
Consolidated

Interest income:

Loans

$ 1,917 $ $ 368,636 $ (255 ) $ 370,298

Money market investments

48 1 828 (48 ) 829

Investment securities

3,397 80 35,542 (2,913 ) 36,106

Trading account securities

5,456 5,456

Total interest income

5,362 81 410,462 (3,216 ) 412,689

Interest expense:

Deposits

32,445 32,445

Short-term borrowings

10,071 (304 ) 9,767

Long-term debt

25,099 7,238 6,641 (2,912 ) 36,066

Total interest expense

25,099 7,238 49,157 (3,216 ) 78,278

Net interest (expense) income

(19,737 ) (7,157 ) 361,305 334,411

Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans

20 228,955 228,975

Provision for loan losses- covered loans

25,500 25,500

Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses

(19,757 ) (7,157 ) 106,850 79,936

Service charges on deposit accounts

41,378 41,378

Other service fees

58,617 (1,338 ) 57,279

Mortgage banking activities

18,081 18,081

Net gain and valuation adjustments on investment securities

5,856 5,856

Trading account loss

(6 ) (4,339 ) (4,345 )

Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

4,291 4,291

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

(11,632 ) (11,632 )

FDIC loss share expense

(3,755 ) (3,755 )

Other operating income

166,002 287 15,277 (1 ) 181,565

Total non-interest income

171,852 287 117,918 (1,339 ) 288,718

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

7,761 98,598 106,359

Net occupancy expenses

918 1 20,140 21,059

Equipment expenses

984 10,501 11,485

Other taxes

84 15,141 15,225

Professional fees

3,383 23 63,663 (54 ) 67,015

Communications

110 6,285 6,395

Business promotion

439 14,918 15,357

FDIC deposit insurance

18,557 18,557

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

7,657 7,657

Other operating expenses

(12,734 ) 109 36,027 (636 ) 22,766

Amortization of intangibles

1,989 1,989

Total operating expenses

945 133 293,476 (690 ) 293,864

139


Table of Contents

Income (loss) before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries

151,150 (7,003 ) (68,708 ) (649 ) 74,790

Income tax expense (benefit)

3,106 (240,194 ) (292 ) (237,380 )

Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

148,044 (7,003 ) 171,486 (357 ) 312,170

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

164,126 12,158 (176,284 )

Income from continuing operations

312,170 5,155 171,486 (176,641 ) 312,170

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

15,298 15,298

Equity in undistributed earnings of discontinued operations

15,298 15,298 (30,596 )

Net income

$ 327,468 $ 20,453 $ 186,784 $ (207,237 ) $ 327,468

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

$ 223,437 $ (24,121 ) $ 86,748 $ (62,627 ) $ 223,437

140


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six months ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
PNA
Holding Co.
All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
Elimination
entries
Popular, Inc.
Consolidated

Interest and dividend income:

Loans

2,926 728,275 (387 ) 730,814

Money market investments

86 2 1,783 (87 ) 1,784

Investment securities

7,543 161 72,049 (5,824 ) 73,929

Trading account securities

10,970 10,970

Total interest and dividend income

10,555 163 813,077 (6,298 ) 817,497

Interest expense:

Deposits

67,063 (2 ) 67,061

Short-term borrowings

20,020 (472 ) 19,548

Long-term debt

49,857 14,514 13,286 (5,824 ) 71,833

Total interest expense

49,857 14,514 100,369 (6,298 ) 158,442

Net interest (expense) income

(39,302 ) (14,351 ) 712,708 659,055

Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans

(20 ) 438,088 438,068

Provision for loan losses- covered loans

43,056 43,056

Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses

(39,282 ) (14,351 ) 231,564 177,931

Service charges on deposit accounts

82,539 82,539

Other service fees

113,622 (1,399 ) 112,223

Mortgage banking activities

38,378 38,378

Net gain and valuation adjustments on investment securities

5,856 5,856

Trading account profit (loss)

70 (5,399 ) (5,329 )

Net loss on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

(58,428 ) (58,428 )

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

(27,775 ) (27,775 )

FDIC loss share expense

(30,021 ) (30,021 )

Other operating income

166,872 2,849 31,864 201,585

Total non-interest income

172,798 2,849 144,780 (1,399 ) 319,028

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

15,140 198,800 213,940

Net occupancy expenses

1,746 2 39,803 41,551

Equipment expenses

2,064 21,041 23,105

Other taxes

167 26,586 26,753

Professional fees

5,694 45 129,128 (115 ) 134,752

Communications

203 12,743 12,946

Business promotion

869 27,073 27,942

FDIC deposit insurance

26,913 26,913

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

53,524 53,524

Other operating expenses

(25,349 ) 217 70,069 (1,253 ) 43,684

Amortization of intangibles

3,979 3,979

Total operating expenses

534 264 609,659 (1,368 ) 609,089

Income (loss) before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries

132,982 (11,766 ) (233,315 ) (31 ) (112,130 )

Income tax expense (benefit)

3,621 (297,771 ) (107 ) (294,257 )

Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

129,361 (11,766 ) 64,456 76 182,127

141


Table of Contents

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

52,766 16,368 (69,134 )

Income from continuing operations

182,127 4,602 64,456 (69,058 ) 182,127

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

25,034 25,034

Equity in undistributed earnings of discontinued operations

25,034 25,034 (50,068 )

Net Income

$ 207,161 $ 29,636 $ 89,490 $ (119,126 ) $ 207,161

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

$ 83,990 $ (21,965 ) $ (32,286 ) $ 54,251 $ 83,990

142


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Six months ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
PNA
Holding Co.
All other
subsidiaries
and eliminations
Elimination
entries
Popular, Inc.
Consolidated

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net (loss) income

$ (424,905 ) $ (103,753 ) $ 46,674 $ 57,079 $ (424,905 )

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

Equity in undistributed (earnings) losses of subsidiaries

(39,498 ) 96,533 (57,035 )

Provision for loan losses

(176 ) 134,926 134,750

Goodwill impairment losses

186,511 186,511

Amortization of intangibles

5,007 5,007

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

325 23,507 23,832

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

404,461 (79,682 ) 324,779

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

15,836 15,836

FDIC loss share expense

79,467 79,467

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

17,801 17,801

(Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method

(6,509 ) 688 (18,534 ) (24,355 )

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

8,150 (5,491 ) 30 2,689

Loss (gain) on:

Disposition of premises and equipment

(1 ) (2,550 ) (2,551 )

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held for sale and mortgage banking activities

(42,413 ) (42,413 )

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

(2,035 ) (2,035 )

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

(159,727 ) (159,727 )

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

72,757 72,757

Net originations on loans held-for-sale

(338,672 ) (338,672 )

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

(224 ) 460,016 459,792

Accrued income receivable

(68 ) 2 6,725 62 6,721

Other assets

9,592 (7,095 ) (25,477 ) (25,475 ) (48,455 )

Net increase (decrease) in:

Interest payable

2,080 5 (1,390 ) (62 ) 633

Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations

(3,096 ) (3,096 )

Other liabilities

(4,312 ) (32,031 ) 41,202 25,401 30,260

Total adjustments

373,820 58,102 364,688 (57,079 ) 739,531

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

(51,085 ) (45,651 ) 411,362 314,626

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net (increase) decrease in money market investments

(1,014 ) 4,204 (808,477 ) (3,204 ) (808,491 )

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

(1,079,586 ) (1,079,586 )

Other

(51,097 ) (51,097 )

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

816,830 816,830

Held-to-maturity

27,029 27,029

Other

64,724 64,724

Net (originations) repayments on loans

(67,240 ) 473,634 66,942 473,336

Proceeds from sale of loans

87,983 87,983

Acquisition of loan portfolios

(289,292 ) (289,292 )

Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements

110,618 110,618

Capital contribution to subsidiary

(100,000 ) 100,000

Return of capital from wholly-owned subsidiaries

210,000 250,000 (460,000 )

Acquisition of premises and equipment

(352 ) (19,981 ) (20,333 )

143


Table of Contents

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment

24 8,607 8,631

Foreclosed assets

81,010 81,010

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

41,418 254,204 (577,998 ) (296,262 ) (578,638 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

241,260 11,455 252,715

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

418,381 418,381

Other short-term borrowings

1,443 (304,500 ) (66,943 ) (370,000 )

Payments of notes payable

(111,030 ) (111,030 )

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

31,905 31,905

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

3,048 3,048

Dividends paid

(1,862 ) (1,862 )

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

(861 ) (861 )

Return of capital to parent company

(210,000 ) (250,000 ) 460,000

Capital contribution from parent

100,000 (100,000 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

325 (208,557 ) 126,016 304,512 222,296

Net decrease in cash and due from banks

(9,342 ) (4 ) (40,620 ) 8,250 (41,716 )

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

10,595 616 422,967 (10,967 ) 423,211

Cash and due from banks at end of period, including discontinued operations

1,253 612 382,347 (2,717 ) 381,495

Less: cash from discontinued operations

18,923 18,923

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 1,253 $ 612 $ 363,424 $ (2,717 ) $ 362,572

The Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

144


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Six months ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
PNA
Holding Co.
All other
subsidiaries
and eliminations
Elimination
entries
Popular, Inc.
Consolidated

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income (loss)

$ 207,161 $ 29,636 $ 89,490 $ (119,126 ) $ 207,161

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

(77,800 ) (41,402 ) 119,202

Provision for loan losses

(20 ) 473,284 473,264

Amortization of intangibles

4,935 4,935

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

323 2 24,684 25,009

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

14,989 38 (44,552 ) (29,525 )

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

10,741 10,741

FDIC loss share expense

30,021 30,021

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

27,775 27,775

Earnings from investments under the equity method

(20,297 ) (2,849 ) (11,068 ) (34,214 )

Deferred income tax benefit

(9,098 ) (312,649 ) (107 ) (321,854 )

(Gain) loss on:

Disposition of premises and equipment

(2,347 ) (2,347 )

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held for sale and mortgage banking activities

44,577 44,577

Sale of stock in equity method investee

(136,722 ) (136,722 )

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

35,006 35,006

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

(15,335 ) (15,335 )

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

119,003 119,003

Net originations on loans held-for-sale

(867,917 ) (867,917 )

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

(166 ) 858,258 858,092

Accrued income receivable

1,583 (19,475 ) (285 ) (18,177 )

Other assets

(3,505 ) 100 4,199 1,309 2,103

Net increase (decrease) in:

Interest payable

(7 ) (2,533 ) (30 ) (2,570 )

Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations

3,786 3,786

Other liabilities

(2,165 ) (9 ) 7,192 (963 ) 4,055

Total adjustments

(232,878 ) (44,127 ) 367,585 119,126 209,706

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

(25,717 ) (14,491 ) 457,075 416,867

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net (increase) decrease in money market investments

(21,914 ) (251 ) 13,755 22,051 13,641

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

(1,490,647 ) (1,490,647 )

Held-to-maturity

Other

(116,731 ) (116,731 )

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

35,000 1,343,311 1,378,311

Held-to-maturity

2,359 2,359

Other

83,592 83,592

Net (originations) repayments on loans

(137,255 ) 568,817 192,700 624,262

Proceeds from sale of loans

295,237 295,237

Acquisition of loan portfolios

(1,520,088 ) (1,520,088 )

Net payments to FDIC under loss sharing agreements

(107 ) (107 )

Return of capital from equity method investments

438 438

145


Table of Contents

Proceeds from sale of sale of stock in equity method investee

166,332 166,332

Capital contribution to subsidiary

(17,300 ) 17,300

Mortgage servicing rights purchased

(45 ) (45 )

Acquisition of premises and equipment

(198 ) (19,576 ) (19,774 )

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment

28 5,863 5,891

Foreclosed assets

120,365 120,365

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

24,693 187 (713,895 ) 232,051 (456,964 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

(259,645 ) (305 ) (259,950 )

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

(322,247 ) (21,800 ) (344,047 )

Other short-term borrowings

782,700 (192,700 ) 590,000

Payments of notes payable

(3,000 ) (45,458 ) (48,458 )

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

49,874 49,874

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

3,232 3,232

Dividends paid

(1,551 ) (1,551 )

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

(325 ) (325 )

Capital contribution from parent

17,300 (17,300 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

1,356 14,300 205,224 (232,105 ) (11,225 )

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

332 (4 ) (51,596 ) (54 ) (51,322 )

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

1,103 624 439,552 (1,916 ) 439,363

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 1,435 $ 620 $ 387,956 $ (1,970 ) $ 388,041

The Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

146


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report includes management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of the consolidated financial position and financial performance of Popular, Inc. (the “Corporation” or “Popular”). All accompanying tables, financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report should be considered an integral part of this analysis.

The Corporation is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States (“U.S.”) mainland, and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail, including residential mortgage loan originations, and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as investment banking, broker-dealer, auto and equipment leasing and financing, and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the U.S. mainland, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA focuses efforts and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA, under the name Popular Community Bank, operates branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporation’s business segments. As of June 30, 2014, the Corporation had a 14.8% interest in the holding company of EVERTEC, which provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, including servicing many of the Corporation’s system infrastructures and transaction processing businesses. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded $2.6 million in earnings from its investment in EVERTEC, which had a carrying amount of $22.2 million as of the end of the quarter. Also, the Corporation had a 15.8% stake in BHD Financial Group (“BHD”), one of the largest banking and financial services groups in the Dominican Republic. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded $5.5 million in earnings from its investment in BHD, which had a carrying amount of $99.1 million, as of the end of the quarter.

OVERVIEW

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded a net loss of $511.3 million compared with a net income of $327.5 million for the same quarter of the previous year. Net loss from continuing operations was $329.6 million for the second quarter of 2014, compared to a net income of $312.2 million for the same quarter of the previous year. The results for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were impacted by the accelerated amortization of $414.1 million of discount and deferred costs related to the repayment of TARP funds, recognized as interest expense in the quarter, a goodwill impairment charge of $186.5 million related to the announced sales of the California, Central Florida and Illinois regions of Popular Community Bank (“PCB”) and income tax net positive adjustments of $14.5 million resulting from a closing agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury and the impact of the tax treatment of senior notes issued to partially fund the TARP repayment. Excluding the impact of these events, the adjusted net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was $86.2 million.

Recent significant events

On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury through the repurchase of $935 million of trust capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Corporation funded the repurchase through a combination of available cash and approximately $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019 which settled on July 1, 2014.

On July 23, 2014, the Corporation also completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008 for a repurchase price of $3.0 million. The warrant represented the right to purchase 2,093,284 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $67 per share with an original term of 10 years. With the completion of this transaction, the Corporation completed its exit from the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

In connection with the repayment of TARP on July 2, 2014, the Corporation accelerated the related amortization of the discount and deferred costs amounting to $414.1 million during the second quarter of 2014, which is reflected as part of interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

147


Table of Contents
On April 22, 2014, BPNA entered into definitive agreements to sell its California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations to three different buyers. BPNA completed the sale of its Illinois regional operations on August 8, 2014. The remaining transactions are expected to be completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2014. In connection with these transactions, the Corporation intends to centralize certain back office operations in Puerto Rico and New York. The decision to sell these businesses resulted in the discontinuance of each of these respective operations. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $186.5 million, related to the goodwill asset allocated to these regions. This non-cash charge had no impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios. The Corporation expects to realize a net premium estimated of approximately $24 million, before customary transaction costs, upon the closing of these transactions.

In connection with the reorganization plan, the Corporation estimates that it will incur in restructuring charges of approximately $54 million, comprised of $32 million in severance, retention and employee related costs and $22 million in operational set-up costs and lease cancelations, of which approximately $5 million were incurred during the second quarter of 2014. The remaining costs consisting of severance payments and other employee benefits, lease and other contract termination expenses will be recognized as they are incurred during the third and fourth quarter of 2014 and early 2015. Also, in early 2015, annual operating expenses are expected to be reduced by approximately $45 million, after the reorganization is complete.

Current and prior periods’ financial information covering income and expense amounts presented in this MD&A has been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The financial information for prior periods included in this MD&A does not reflect the reclassification of PCB’s assets and liabilities to discontinued operations.

Financial highlights for the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Taxable equivalent net interest expense was $59.4 million for the second quarter of 2014, a decrease of 393.8 million from the same quarter of the prior year. Reported net interest margin for the quarter was (0.51)%. Excluding the impact of the accelerated amortization of TARP discount and deferred costs of $414.1 million, net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis was $375.0 million, an increase of $22.8 million from the same quarter of the previous year and the adjusted net interest margin was 4.94%, an increase of 23 basis points from the same quarter of the previous year. The increase in the adjusted net interest income was mainly related to higher yields from covered loans due to a decrease in expected credit losses and loan resolutions which resulted in higher accretion income; higher income from collections of commercial loans which were in non-accrual status; higher income from consumer loans due to the purchase of $90 million during the first quarter of 2014; lower deposit and borrowing costs due to the replacement of deposits at lower rates and the early repayment of senior notes of $233.2 million during the third quarter of 2013. Refer to the Net Interest Income section of this MD&A for a discussion of the major variances in net interest income, including yields and costs.

Non-covered, non-performing loans increased by $49.0 million, or 7%, when compared to December 31, 2013 driven in large part by a single $52 million commercial credit relationship that was placed in non-accrual status during the first quarter of 2014. The ratio of non-performing loans to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, increased to 3.26% at June 30, 2014 from 2.77% at December 31, 2013, impacted by the reclassification of $1.8 billion in loans to discontinued operations, of which $9.5 million were in non-performing status. The Corporation’s annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio ratio was 0.94% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, down from 1.47% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 decreased by $32.9 million when compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The decline is mostly driven by improvements in the credit performance of the loans portfolios particularly in the U.S. mainland and de-risking strategies taken by the Corporation to improve the risk profile of its portfolios. The non-performing loans bulk sale completed during the first and second quarters of 2013 added $362.6 million in write-downs at the BPPR operations, which are excluded from the above mentioned net charge-off metrics. The BPNA segment continued to reflect strong credit quality results for the second quarter of 2014. Nevertheless, challenging economic and fiscal conditions in Puerto Rico continued to influence credit quality results in the BPPR reportable segment.

The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 totalled $61.7 million, compared with $254.5 million for the same period in 2013, a decline of $192.8 million. The provision for the second quarter of 2013, includes an incremental provision of $169.2 million related to the bulk sale of non-performing mortgage loans completed during such

148


Table of Contents

quarter. Excluding the impact of this transaction, the provision for the second quarter of 2014 declined $23.6 million when compared with the same quarter of the previous year mainly due to reserve releases at BPNA. The provision for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio totalled $50.1 million, compared with $229.0 million for the same quarter in 2013, a decline of $178.9 million, mostly due to the above mentioned bulk loan sale of non-performing assets completed in the second quarter of 2013 and reserve releases at BPNA due to improved credit quality trends. The provision for covered loans totalled $11.6 million in the second quarter of 2014, compared with $25.5 million for the same quarter in 2013, a decrease of $13.9 million, mostly driven by lower impairment losses from the commercial portfolios.

Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for an explanation of the main factors impacting the provision for loan losses and a detailed analysis of net charge-offs, non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics.

Non-interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was $62.8 million, a decline of $225.9 million compared to the same quarter in the previous year. This decrease was mainly attributed to a the gain of $162.1 million recorded during the second quarter of 2013, related to EVERTEC’s IPO, offset by the loss of $72.2 million related to the bulk sale of non-performing assets completed during such quarter. Furthermore, a higher amortization of the FDIC indemnification asset by $33.5 million, due to lower estimated credit losses, and lower income from mortgage banking activities by $14.3 million, contributed to the decline in non-interest income.

Refer to the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A for additional information on the main variances that affected the non-interest income categories.

Operating expenses decreased by $18.4 million when compared to the second quarter of 2013 due mainly to the following main factors:

Lower FDIC deposit insurance expense due to improvements in asset quality and credit trends;

Lower personnel costs by $7.3 million, principally due to changes to actuarial assumptions in BPPR’s pension obligations and lower hospital and life insurance expenses;

Lower OREO expenses by $4.2 million driven by lower maintenance costs as a result of properties sold

The above positive variances were offset by restructuring costs of $4.6 million incurred in connection with the reorganization of PCB. Refer to the Operating Expenses section of this MD&A for additional information

Income tax benefit for the second quarter of 2014 amounted to $4.1 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $237.4 million for the second quarter of 2013. The variance in income tax benefit is mainly due to the change in the statutory tax rate from 30% to 39% during the second quarter of 2013, which resulted in a tax benefit of approximately $215.6 million. During the second quarter of 2014 the Corporation recognized an income tax benefit of approximately $23.4 million due to a reduction in the deferred tax liability associated with the Westernbank loan portfolio as a result of a Closing Agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury (“PR Treasury”) during the quarter, offset by the negative impact of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance of approximately $9.2 million recorded at the Holding Company, due to the difference in the tax treatment of interest expense related to the TARP funds and the newly issued $450 million senior notes.

Total assets amounted to $36.6 billion at June 30, 2014, compared with $35.7 billion at December 31, 2013. The increase in total assets was attributed to:

An increase in money market investments of $808.5 million, mainly due to liquidity held in anticipation of the TARP repayment.

An increase in investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity of $333.0 million due mainly to purchases of U.S. agency obligations at the BPPR segment; and

An increase in other assets of $604.8 million, mainly due to $450 million in trade receivable due to the issuance of senior notes raised near the end of the second quarter with a settlement date of July 1, 2014 to partially fund the repayment of the TARP funds.

149


Table of Contents

The above increases were offset by:

A decrease in the FDIC loss share asset of $197.1 million due to amortization and collections;

A decrease in the non-covered loans held-in-portfolio of $192.6 million, excluding the reclassification of $1.8 billion in loans to discontinued operations, mainly at BPPR due to the reduction in the public sector loans;

A decrease in the covered loans portfolio of $248.3 million due to the continuation of loan resolutions and the normal portfolio run-off; and

A decrease in goodwill of $186.5 million due to the impairment charge recognized in connection with the sale of the PCB regions.

The Corporation’s total deposits increased by $248.3 million, excluding the reclassification of $2.1 billion to discontinued operations, mainly due an increase in demand deposits

The Corporation’s borrowings amounted to $4.5 billion at June 30, 2014, compared with $3.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The increase was mainly due to the accelerated amortization of $414.1 million of discount and deferred costs related to the repayment of TARP funds, as well as the issuance of $450.0 million in senior notes.

Stockholders’ equity totalled $4.3 billion at June 30, 2014, compared with $4.6 billion at December 31, 2013. This decrease mainly resulted from the Corporation’s net loss of $424.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 offset by a decrease of $58.5 million in accumulated other comprehensive loss mainly due to net unrealized losses on investment securities available-for-sale. Capital ratios continued to be strong. The Corporation’s Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio stood at 19.23% at June 30, 2014, while the tangible common equity ratio at June 30, 2014 was 10.28%. Refer to Table 17 for capital ratios and Tables 18 and 19 for Non-GAAP reconciliations.

Table 1 provides selected financial data and performance indicators for the June 30, 2014 and 2013.

As a financial services company, the Corporation’s earnings are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation are influenced by the level of business spending and investment, consumer income, spending and savings, capital market activities, competition, customer preferences, interest rate conditions and prevailing market rates on competing products.

The Corporation continuously monitors general business and economic conditions, industry-related indicators and trends, competition, interest rate volatility, credit quality indicators, loan and deposit demand, operational and systems efficiencies, revenue enhancements and changes in the regulation of financial services companies.

The Corporation operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and local laws and regulations. Also, competition with other financial institutions could adversely affect its profitability.

The description of the Corporation’s business contained in Item 1 of the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Report, while not all inclusive, discusses additional information about the business of the Corporation and risk factors, many beyond the Corporation’s control that, in addition to the other information in this Form 10-Q, readers should consider.

The Corporation’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol BPOP.

150


Table of Contents

Table 1—Financial Highlights

Financial Condition Highlights

Ending balances at Average for the six months ended

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013
Variance June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 Variance

Money market investments

$ 1,666,944 $ 858,453 $ 808,491 $ 1,346,593 $ 1,040,941 $ 305,652

Investment and trading securities

6,282,220 5,956,791 325,429 6,356,622 5,916,145 440,477

Loans

22,468,336 24,706,719 (2,238,383 ) 22,583,201 22,933,979 (350,778 )

Earning assets

30,417,500 31,521,963 (1,104,463 ) 30,286,417 29,891,065 395,352

Assets from discontinued operations

1,828,382 1,828,382 1,908,616 2,017,531 (108,915 )

Total assets

36,587,902 35,749,333 838,569 36,216,256 34,414,687 1,801,569

Deposits*

24,901,152 26,711,145 (1,809,993 ) 24,659,911 24,682,910 (22,999 )

Borrowings

4,465,965 3,645,246 820,719 3,740,430 4,488,408 (747,978 )

Stockholders’ equity

4,260,441 4,626,150 (365,709 ) 4,781,976 4,003,228 778,748

Liabilities from discontinued operations

2,079,742 2,079,742 2,129,271 2,214,391 (85,120 )

* Average deposits exclude average derivatives.

Operating Highlights

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands, except per share information)

2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance

Net interest (expense) income

$ (59,381 ) $ 334,411 $ (393,792 ) $ 291,790 $ 659,055 $ (367,265 )

Provision for loan losses—non-covered loans

50,074 228,975 (178,901 ) 104,196 438,068 (333,872 )

Provision for loan losses—covered loans

11,604 25,500 (13,896 ) 37,318 43,056 (5,738 )

Non-interest income

62,789 288,718 (225,929 ) 158,821 319,028 (160,207 )

Operating expenses

275,439 293,864 (18,425 ) 553,038 609,089 (56,051 )

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax

(333,709 ) 74,790 (408,499 ) (243,941 ) (112,130 ) (131,811 )

Income tax (benefit) expense

(4,124 ) (237,380 ) 233,256 19,140 (294,257 ) 313,397

(Loss) income from continuing operations

$ (329,585 ) $ 312,170 $ (641,755 ) $ (263,081 ) $ 182,127 $ (445,208 )

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax

(181,729 ) 15,298 (197,027 ) (161,824 ) 25,034 (186,858 )

Net (loss) income

$ (511,314 ) $ 327,468 $ (838,782 ) $ (424,905 ) $ 207,161 $ (632,066 )

Net (loss) income applicable to common stock

$ (512,245 ) $ 326,537 $ (838,782 ) $ (426,767 ) $ 205,300 $ (632,067 )

Net (loss) income from continuing operations

$ (3.21 ) $ 3.03 $ (6.24 ) $ (2.58 ) $ 1.76 $ (4.34 )

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

$ (1.77 ) $ 0.15 $ (1.92 ) $ (1.57 ) $ 0.24 $ (1.81 )

Net (loss) income per Common Share – Basic

$ (4.98 ) $ 3.18 $ (8.16 ) $ (4.15 ) $ 2.00 $ (6.15 )

Net (loss) income from continuing operations

$ (3.21 ) $ 3.02 $ (6.23 ) $ (2.58 ) $ 1.75 $ (4.33 )

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

$ (1.77 ) $ 0.15 $ (1.92 ) $ (1.57 ) $ 0.24 $ (1.81 )

Net (loss) income per Common Share – Diluted

$ (4.98 ) $ 3.17 $ (8.15 ) $ (4.15 ) $ 1.99 $ (6.14 )

151


Table of Contents
Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

Selected Statistical Information

2014 2013 2014 2013

Common Stock Data

Market price

High

$ 34.18 $ 30.60 $ 34.18 $ 30.60

Low

28.93 26.88 25.50 21.70

End

34.18 30.37 34.18 30.37

Book value per common share at period end

40.69 40.13 40.69 40.13

Profitability Ratios

Return on assets

(5.66 )% 3.60 % (2.37 )% 1.15 %

Return on common equity

(43.04 ) 32.77 (18.19 ) 10.47

Net interest spread (taxable equivalent)

4.65 4.43 4.65 4.39

Net interest margin (taxable equivalent)

4.94 4.71 4.94 4.65

Capitalization Ratios

Average equity to average assets

13.31 % 11.73 % 13.20 % 11.63 %

Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets

19.23 17.30 19.23 17.30

Total capital to risk-weighted assets

20.69 18.58 20.69 18.58

Leverage ratio

13.07 11.46 13.07 11.46

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES

The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and general practices within the financial services industry. Various elements of the Corporation’s accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those estimates.

Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and estimates with the Corporation’s Audit Committee. The Corporation has identified as critical accounting policies those related to: (i) Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments; (ii) Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses; (iii) Acquisition Accounting for Loans and Related Indemnification Asset; (iv) Income Taxes; (v) Goodwill, and (vi) Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations. For a summary of these critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to that particular section in the MD&A included in Popular, Inc.’s 2013 Financial Review and Supplementary Information to Stockholders, incorporated by reference in Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “2013 Annual Report”). Also, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2013 Annual Report for a summary of the Corporation’s significant accounting policies.

Allowance for loan losses

The Corporation follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology includes the consideration of factors such as current economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss experience and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on this methodology. Loan losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35. Also, the Corporation determines the allowance for loan losses on purchased impaired loans and purchased loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by analogy, by evaluating decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date.

The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous loans. The determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses includes the following principal factors:

Base net loss rates, which are based on the moving average of annualized net loss rates computed over a 3-year historical loss period for the commercial and construction loan portfolios, and an 18-month period for the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios. The base net loss rates are applied by loan type and by legal entity.

152


Table of Contents
Recent loss trend adjustment, which replaces the base loss rate with a 12-month average loss rate, when these trends are higher than the respective base loss rates. The objective of this adjustment is to allow for a more recent loss trend to be captured and reflected in the ALLL estimation process. As part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models, as discussed in the following paragraphs and implemented as of June 30 th 2014, the Corporation eliminated the use of caps in the recent loss trend adjustment for the consumer and mortgage portfolios, among other revisions. For the period ended December 31, 2013, the recent loss trend adjustment caps for the consumer and mortgage portfolios were triggered in only one portfolio segment within the Puerto Rico consumer portfolio. Management assessed the impact of the applicable cap through a review of qualitative factors that specifically considered the drivers of recent loss trends and changes to the portfolio composition. The related effect of the aforementioned cap was immaterial for the overall level of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses for the Puerto Rico Consumer portfolio.

For the period ended June 30, 2014, 28% (June 30, 2013 - 37%) of the ALLL for BPPR non-covered loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial, personal and auto loan portfolios for 2014, and in the commercial multi-family, mortgage, and leasing portfolios for 2013.

For the period ended June 30, 2014, 23% (June 30, 2013 - 24%) of the ALLL for BPNA loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial and legacy loan portfolios for 2014 and in the commercial multi-family, commercial real estate non-owner occupied and commercial and industrial portfolios for 2013.

For the period ended December 31, 2013, 27% (2012 - 32%) of the ALLL for BPPR non-covered loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, leasing, and auto loan portfolios for 2013, and in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial, construction, credit cards, and personal loan portfolios for 2012.

For the period ended December 31, 2013, 29% (2012 – 8%) of the ALLL for BPNA loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial real estate non-owner occupied, commercial and industrial and legacy loan portfolios for 2013 and in the construction and legacy loan portfolios for 2012.

Environmental factors, which include credit and macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rate, economic activity index and delinquency rates, adopted to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical losses. The Corporation reflects the effect of these environmental factors on each loan group as an adjustment that, as appropriate, increases the historical loss rate applied to each group. Environmental factors provide updated perspective on credit and economic conditions. Regression analysis is used to select these indicators and quantify the effect on the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses.

During the second quarter of 2014, management completed the annual review of the components of the ALLL models. As part of this review management updated core metrics and revised certain components related to the estimation process for evaluating the adequacy of the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses. These enhancements to the ALLL methodology, which are described in the paragraphs below, were implemented as of June 30, 2014 and resulted in a net decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $18.7 million for the non-covered portfolio and a net increase to the allowance for loan losses of $0.8 million for the covered portfolio.

Management made the following principal revisions to the methodology during the second quarter of 2014:

Annual review and recalibration of the environmental factors adjustment. The environmental factor adjustments are developed by performing regression analyses on selected credit and economic indicators for each applicable loan segment. During the second quarter of 2014, the environmental factor models used to account for changes in current credit and macroeconomic conditions were reviewed and recalibrated based on the latest applicable trends. Management also revised the application of environmental factors to the historical loss rates to consider last 12 month trends of the applicable credit and macroeconomic indicators applied as an incremental adjustment to account for emerging risks not necessarily considered in the historical loss rates.

153


Table of Contents

The combined effect of the aforementioned recalibration and enhancements to the environmental factors adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $17 million at June 30, 2014, of which $14.1 million related to the non-covered BPPR portfolio and $3.7 million related to the BPNA segment, offset in part by a $0.8 million increase in the BPPR covered portfoliot.

Increased the historical look-back period for determining the recent loss trend adjustment for consumer and mortgage loans. The Corporation increased the look-back period for assessing recent trends applicable to the determination of consumer and mortgage loan net charge-offs from 6 months to 12 months and eliminated the use of caps. Previously, the Corporation used a recent loss trend adjustment based on 6 months of net charge-offs up to a determined cap. Given the current overall consumer and mortgage credit quality improvements, management concluded that a 12-month look-back period for the recent loss trend adjustment aligns the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology to current credit quality trends while limiting excessive pro-cyclicality given the longer look-back period analysis, thus, eliminating the aforementioned caps.

The combined effect of the aforementioned enhancements to the recent loss trend adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $1 million at June 30, 2014, of which $0.9 million related to the non-covered BPPR segment and $0.1 million related to the BPNA segment.

Discontinued Operations

Components of the Corporation that will be disposed of by sale, where the Corporation does not have a significant continuing involvement in the operations after the disposal, are accounted for as discontinued operations. The results of operations of the discontinued operations exclude allocations of corporate overhead. Refer to Note 3, Discontinued Operations, for additional information on the discontinued operations.

154


Table of Contents

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented with its different components on Tables 2 and 3 for the quarter and six months periods ended June 30, 2014 as compared with the same periods in 2013, segregated by major categories of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.

The interest earning assets include the investment securities and loans that are exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are certain investments in obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies and sponsored entities, and certain obligations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its agencies. To facilitate the comparison of all interest related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent basis, using the applicable statutory income tax rates for each quarter. The taxable equivalent computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by the Puerto Rico tax law.

Average outstanding securities balances are based upon amortized cost excluding any unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans have been included in the respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest yield. Prepayment penalties, late fees collected and the amortization of premiums / discounts on purchased loans are also included as part of the loan yield.

Taxable equivalent net interest expense was $59.4 million for the second quarter of 2014, a decrease of $393.8 million from the same quarter of the prior year. Net interest margin, as reported, was (0.51)%. Excluding the impact of the accelerated amortization of TARP discount and deferred costs of $414.1 million, net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis was $375.0 million, an increase of $22.8 million from the same quarter of the previous year. The adjusted net interest margin was 4.94%, an increase of 23 basis points from the same quarter of the previous year. The main reasons for the increase were:

Higher yield from covered loans by 323 basis points mainly due to reduced expected losses resulting from the recasting process and the resolution of certain commercial loans that resulted in higher accretion income, partially offset by lower volume of the portfolio.

Higher interest income from commercial loans by $4.2 million mainly due to higher volume of the portfolio and interest collected on loans in nonaccrual status.

Higher interest income from consumer loans by $3.4 million related to purchased loans at the end of the first quarter 2014 and higher volume of auto loans due to higher lending activity at Popular Auto.

A lower average cost of interest bearing deposits by 13 bps, mainly lower cost certificates of deposits and individual retirement accounts as these come due and are re-priced at lower rates; also lower volume of broker CDs, contributed to the decrease in the deposits interest expense.

Long term debt reflected a reduction of 80 basis points due to the early repayment, on the third quarter of 2013, of $233.2 million in senior notes at an average cost of 7.77%.

These positive variances were partially offset by lower volume and yield on mortgage loans resulting in lower interest income by approximately $6.4 million as compared to the same quarter in 2013 mostly due to lower volume by $328 million.

155


Table of Contents

Table 2—Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Continuing Operations

Quarters ended June 30,

Average Volume

Average Yields / Costs Interest

Variance

Attributable to

2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance Rate Volume
($ in millions) (In thousands)
$1,378 $ 980 $ 398 0.33 % 0.34 % (0.01 )% Money market investments $ 1,131 $ 829 $ 302 $ 67 $ 235
6,028 5,535 493 2.75 3.04 (0.29 ) Investment securities 41,376 42,017 (641 ) (1,567 ) 926
433 428 5 5.59 6.20 (0.61 ) Trading securities 6,024 6,614 (590 ) (658 ) 68

7,839 6,943 896 2.48 2.85 (0.37 ) Total money market, investment and trading securities 48,531 49,460 (929 ) (2,158 ) 1,229

Loans:
8,446 8,206 240 5.08 5.03 0.05 Commercial 107,041 102,851 4,190 1,157 3,033
175 312 (137 ) 5.55 4.52 1.03 Construction 2,416 3,512 (1,096 ) 680 (1,776 )
546 542 4 7.43 8.02 (0.59 ) Leasing 10,151 10,880 (729 ) (805 ) 76
6,691 7,019 (328 ) 5.34 5.45 (0.11 ) Mortgage 89,314 95,699 (6,385 ) (1,979 ) (4,406 )
3,894 3,720 174 10.44 10.56 (0.12 ) Consumer 101,350 97,901 3,449 (603 ) 4,052

19,752 19,799 (47 ) 6.30 6.29 0.01 Sub-total loans 310,272 310,843 (571 ) (1,550 ) 979
2,811 3,269 (458 ) 11.83 8.60 3.23 Covered loans 82,975 70,136 12,839 20,715 (7,876 )

22,563 23,068 (505 ) 6.99 6.62 0.37 Total loans 393,247 380,979 12,268 19,165 (6,897 )

$30,402 $ 30,011 $ 391 5.82 % 5.75 % 0.07 % Total earning assets $ 441,778 $ 430,439 $ 11,339 $ 17,007 $ (5,668 )

Interest bearing deposits:
$4,897 $ 4,736 $ 161 0.32 % 0.35 % (0.03 )% NOW and money market [1] $ 3,847 $ 4,158 $ (311 ) $ (447 ) $ 136
6,713 6,538 175 0.22 0.25 (0.03 ) Savings 3,628 4,020 (392 ) (481 ) 89
7,709 8,073 (364 ) 0.98 1.21 (0.23 ) Time deposits 18,748 24,267 (5,519 ) (3,930 ) (1,589 )

19,319 19,347 (28 ) 0.54 0.67 (0.13 ) Total deposits 26,223 32,445 (6,222 ) (4,858 ) (1,364 )

2,099 2,722 (623 ) 1.70 1.44 0.26 Short-term borrowings [3] 8,892 9,767 (875 ) (443 ) (432 )
536 511 25 15.92 15.95 (0.03 ) TARP funds [2] 21,342 20,374 968 (48 ) 1,016
979 1,253 (274 ) 4.21 5.01 (0.80 ) Other medium and long-term debt [3] 10,306 15,692 (5,386 ) (561 ) (4,825 )

22,933 23,833 (900 ) 1.17 1.32 (0.15 ) Total interest bearing liabilities 66,763 78,278 (11,515 ) (5,910 ) (5,605 )

5,451 5,388 63 Non-interest bearing demand deposits
2,018 790 1,228 Other sources of funds

$30,402 $ 30,011 $ 391 0.88 % 1.04 % (0.16 )% Total source of funds 66,763 78,278 (11,515 ) (5,910 ) (5,605 )

4.94 % 4.71 % 0.23 % Net interest margin

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis 375,015 352,161 22,854 $ 22,917 $ (63 )

4.65 % 4.43 % 0.22 % Net interest spread

Accelerated amortization TARP discount and related deferred costs 414,068 414,068
Taxable equivalent adjustment 20,328 17,750 2,578

Net interest income $ (59,381 ) $ 334,411 $ (393,792 )

(0.51 )% Net interest margin including accelerated amortization of TARP discount and related costs

Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based on the proportion of the change in each category.

[1] Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto Rico.
[2] Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures.
[3] Cost of borrowings excludes the impact of the accelerated amortization. Total cost of borrowings for the second quarter of 2014 including the accelerated amortization of TARP discount would have been 50.31%.

156


Table of Contents

The results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 were impacted by the same factors described in the quarterly results, being the most significant the increase in the covered loan portfolio yield.

Table 3—Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Continuing Operations

Six Months ended June 30,

Average Volume Average Yields / Costs Interest Variance
Attributable to
2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance Rate Volume
(In millions) (In thousands)
$1,347 $ 1,041 $ 306 0.32 % 0.35 % (0.03 )% Money market investments $ 2,104 $ 1,784 $ 320 $ 48 $ 272
5,933 5,488 445 2.78 3.11 (0.33 ) Investment securities 82,493 85,230 (2,737 ) (4,842 ) 2,105
423 428 (5 ) 5.73 6.23 (0.50 ) Trading securities 12,022 13,206 (1,184 ) (1,049 ) (135 )

7,703 6,957 746 2.51 2.88 (0.37 ) Total money market, investment and trading securities 96,619 100,220 (3,601 ) (5,843 ) 2,242

Loans:
8,467 8,224 243 5.05 4.93 0.12 Commercial 212,172 201,058 11,114 5,098 6,016
180 338 (158 ) 8.11 4.18 3.93 Construction 7,252 7,008 244 4,536 (4,292 )
545 542 3 7.50 8.19 (0.69 ) Leasing 20,455 22,213 (1,758 ) (1,870 ) 112
6,691 6,716 (25 ) 5.39 5.44 (0.05 ) Mortgage 180,497 182,581 (2,084 ) (1,407 ) (677 )
3,828 3,723 105 10.42 10.57 (0.15 ) Consumer 197,783 195,068 2,715 (2,086 ) 4,801

19,711 19,543 168 6.31 6.26 0.05 Sub-total loans 618,159 607,928 10,231 4,271 5,960
2,872 3,391 (519 ) 11.50 8.45 3.05 Covered loans 164,073 142,320 21,753 40,073 (18,320 )

22,583 22,934 (351 ) 6.97 6.58 0.39 Total loans 782,232 750,248 31,984 44,344 (12,360 )

$30,286 $ 29,891 $ 395 5.83 % 5.72 % 0.11 % Total earning assets $ 878,851 $ 850,468 $ 28,383 $ 38,501 $ (10,118 )

Interest bearing deposits:
$4,817 $ 4,666 $ 151 0.32 % 0.37 % (0.05 )% NOW and money market [1] $ 7,625 $ 8,592 $ (967 ) $ (1,234 ) $ 267
6,702 6,530 172 0.22 0.25 (0.03 ) Savings 7,187 8,140 (953 ) (1,117 ) 164
7,624 8,172 (548 ) 1.01 1.24 (0.23 ) Time deposits 38,269 50,329 (12,060 ) (8,206 ) (3,854 )

19,143 19,368 (225 ) 0.56 0.70 (0.14 ) Total deposits 53,081 67,061 (13,980 ) (10,557 ) (3,423 )

2,201 2,722 (521 ) 1.64 1.45 0.19 Short-term borrowings [3] 17,932 19,548 (1,616 ) 177 (1,793 )
534 507 27 15.98 15.95 0.03 TARP funds [2] 42,673 40,407 2,266 93 2,173
1,005 1,260 (255 ) 4.16 5.00 (0.84 ) Other medium and long-term debt [3] 20,865 31,426 (10,561 ) (1,139 ) (9,422 )

22,883 23,857 (974 ) 1.18 1.33 (0.15 ) Total interest bearing liabilities 134,551 158,442 (23,891 ) (11,426 ) (12,465 )

5,517 5,315 202 Non-interest bearing demand deposits
1,886 719 1,167 Other sources of funds

$30,286 $ 29,891 $ 395 0.89 % 1.07 % (0.18 )% Total source of funds 134,551 158,442 (23,891 ) (11,426 ) (12,465 )

4.94 % 4.65 % 0.29 % Net interest margin

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis 744,300 692,026 52,274 $ 49,927 $ 2,347

4.65 % 4.39 % 0.26 % Net interest spread

Accelerated amortization TARP discount and related deferred costs 414,068 414,068
Taxable equivalent adjustment 38,442 32,971 5,471

Net interest income $ 291,790 $ 659,055 $ (367,265 )

2.20 % Net interest margin including accelerated amortization of TARP discount and related costs

Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based on the proportion of the change in each category.

[1] Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto Rico.
[2] Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures.
[3] Cost of borrowings excludes the impact of the accelerated amortization. Total cost of borrowings for the six months ended June 30, 2014 including the accelerated amortization of TARP discount would have been 26.51%.

157


Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses

The Corporation’s total provision for loan losses totaled $61.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 compared with $254.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

The provision for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio totaled $50.1 million, compared with $229.0 million for the same quarter in 2013, reflecting a decrease of $178.9 million, mostly due to an incremental provision of $169.2 million as a result of the bulk sale of non-performing residential mortgage loans completed during the second quarter of 2013. Excluding the impact of the sale, the provision for loans losses declined by $9.7 million. In addition, the Corporation recorded a reserve release of $18.7 million during the second quarter of 2014 due to the annual recalibration and enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology, compared to a reserve increase of $11.8 million for the second quarter of 2013 due to enhancements completed in that quarter. Net charge-offs, excluding write-downs related to the bulk sale in 2013, decreased by $32.9 million from the same quarter prior year, driven by improvements in the credit performance of most portfolios.

The provision for the Puerto Rico non-covered portfolio amounted to $74.9 million, compared to $230.5 million in the second quarter of 2013, reflecting the aforementioned impact of the bulk loan sale. Excluding the impact of the sale, the provision for loan losses increased by $13.6 million, when compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2013, predominantly driven by environmental factors accounting for prevailing macroeconomic conditions in Puerto Rico and the effect of downgrades in the internal risk ratings of certain large corporate and public sector relationships. These increases were partially offset by a $14.9 million reserve release as part of the annual recalibration and enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies section of this MD&A for further details of these revisions.

The U.S. operations recorded a provision release of $24.8 million for the second quarter of 2014, compared to a provision release of $1.5 million for the same quarter in 2013 prompted by continued improvements in credit quality trends and the effect of a $3.8 million reserve release as part of the annual recalibration and enhancements of the ALLL models.

158


Table of Contents

The provision for covered loans totaled $11.6 million in the second quarter of 2014, compared with $25.5 million for the same quarter in 2013, reflecting a decrease of $13.9 million. This decrease is due to lower impairment losses on commercial loan pools accounted for under ASC 310-30 and the impact of a $7.5 million reserve increase related to recalibration and enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology implemented during the second quarter of 2013. Overall expected loss estimates for pools accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 continue to be lower than originally estimated. In addition, as part of the annual recalibration and enhancements of the ALLL models, the Corporation recorded a $0.8 million reserve increase during the second quarter of 2014.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s total provision for loan losses totaled $141.5 million, compared with $481.1 million for the same period in 2013, decreasing by $339.6 million, mostly due to the impact of $318.1 million related to the bulk loan sales completed during 2013. Excluding the impact of the sales, the provision reflects a decrease of $21.5 million from the six month period ended June 30, 2013, mostly driven by continued credit quality improvements in the US operations. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2014 include a $17.9 million reserve release as part of the annual recalibration and enhancements of the ALLL models, compared to a reserve increase of $19.3 million for the same period of 2013 due to enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology.

For the six months period ended June 30, 2014 the provision for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio decreased by $333.9 million when compared to the same period of 2013, mainly due to the $318.1 million impact of the loan sales during 2013. Excluding the impact of the sales, the provision would have declined by $15.8 million, led by a decrease of $27.9 million in the US operations, offset by an increase of $12.1 million in the BPPR segment primarily due to challenging economic conditions in Puerto Rico, as stated above.

The provision for the covered portfolio was $37.3 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2014, compared to $43.1 million for same period of last year. This decrease is due to lower impairment losses on commercial loan pools accounted for under ASC 310-30 and the impact of a $7.5 million reserve increase related to the recalibration and enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology implemented during the second quarter of 2013.

Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality sections of this MD&A for a detailed analysis of net charge-offs, non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics.

NON-INTEREST INCOME

Refer to Table 4 for a breakdown on non-interest income by major categories for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Table 4—Non-Interest Income

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance

Service charges on deposit accounts

$ 39,237 $ 41,378 $ (2,141 ) $ 78,596 $ 82,539 $ (3,943 )

Other service fees:

Debit card fees

11,000 10,395 605 21,544 20,460 1,084

Insurance fees

12,406 11,550 856 24,125 23,157 968

Credit card fees

16,985 16,265 720 33,068 31,819 1,249

Sale and administration of investment products

7,456 10,243 (2,787 ) 13,913 18,960 (5,047 )

Trust fees

4,566 4,154 412 9,029 8,612 417

Other fees

4,055 4,672 (617 ) 7,607 9,215 (1,608 )

Total other service fees

56,468 57,279 (811 ) 109,286 112,223 (2,937 )

Mortgage banking activities

3,788 18,081 (14,293 ) 7,466 38,378 (30,912 )

Net gain (loss) and valuation adjustments of investment securities

5,856 (5,856 ) 5,856 (5,856 )

Trading account profit (loss)

1,055 (4,345 ) 5,400 3,032 (5,329 ) 8,361

Net gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation adjustment on loans held-for-sale

9,659 4,291 5,368 14,052 (58,428 ) 72,480

Adjustment (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

(7,454 ) (11,632 ) 4,178 (17,801 ) (27,775 ) 9,974

FDIC loss share (expense) income

(55,261 ) (3,755 ) (51,506 ) (79,467 ) (30,021 ) (49,446 )

Other operating income

15,297 181,565 (166,268 ) 43,657 201,585 (157,928 )

Total non-interest income

$ 62,789 $ 288,718 $ (225,929 ) $ 158,821 $ 319,028 $ (160,207 )

159


Table of Contents

Table 5—Mortgage Banking Activities

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance

Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments:

Mortgage servicing fees

$ 10,558 $ 11,313 $ (755 ) $ 21,306 $ 22,556 $ (1,250 )

Mortgage servicing rights fair value adjustments

(7,740 ) (5,126 ) (2,614 ) (15,836 ) (10,741 ) (5,095 )

Total mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments

2,818 6,187 (3,369 ) 5,470 11,815 (6,345 )

Net gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation on loans held-for-sale

8,189 (351 ) 8,540 15,365 13,409 1,956

Trading account (loss) profit:

Unrealized gains (losses) on outstanding derivative positions

22 622 (600 ) (738 ) 600 (1,338 )

Realized (losses) gains on closed derivative positions

(7,241 ) 11,623 (18,864 ) (12,631 ) 12,554 (25,185 )

Total trading account (loss) profit

(7,219 ) 12,245 (19,464 ) (13,369 ) 13,154 (26,523 )

Total mortgage banking activities

$ 3,788 $ 18,081 $ (14,293 ) $ 7,466 $ 38,378 $ (30,912 )

Non-interest income decreased by $225.9 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared with the same quarter of the previous year. During the second quarter of 2013, BPPR completed the sale of a portfolio of non-performing residential mortgage loans with a loss of $3.9 million and reserve for indemnification claims of $3.0 million. In addition, in connection with the EVERTEC IPO completed during the second quarter of 2013, the Corporation recognized other operating income of $162.1 million and a prepayment penalty fee of $5.9 million from EVERTEC’s early repayment of its debt security. Excluding the impact of these transactions completed during the second quarter of 2013, non-interest income decreased $64.9 million.

The decrease in non-interest income was principally due to:

Lower other operating income by $166.3 million mostly due to the gain of $162.1 million during the second quarter of 2013 from EVERTEC’s IPO;

Unfavorable variance in FDIC loss share (expense) income of $51.5 million due mainly to a higher amortization of the indemnification asset by $33.5 million. During the second quarter, the Corporation revised its analysis of expected cash flows which resulted in a net decrease of approximately $102.9 million in estimated credit losses, which was driven mainly by commercial loan pools. Though this will have a positive impact on the Corporation’s interest accretion in future periods, the carrying value of the indemnification asset was amortized to reflect lower levels of expected losses. This amortization is recognized over the shorter of the remaining life of the loan pools, which had an average life of approximately six years, or the indemnification asset, which as of June 30, 2014 is one year for commercial, construction and consumer loans and of six years for single-family residential mortgage loans. Additionally, lower mirror accounting of credit impairment losses by $15.0 million also contributed to the higher expense. Refer to Table 6 for a breakdown of FDIC loss share (expenses) income by major categories;

Lower mortgage banking activities revenues by $14.3 million due to an unfavorable variance of $18.9 million in realized gains / (losses) on closed derivative positions and higher unfavorable valuation adjustments on mortgage servicing rights at BPPR segment. Refer to Table 5 for details of mortgage banking activities; and

Lower gains on investment securities by $5.9 million due to EVERTEC’s prepayment penalty fee resulting from the early repayment of its debt security.

These unfavorable variances were partially offset by:

Higher trading account profit by $5.4 million mainly at BPPR segment due to higher volume of MBS outstanding at higher market prices;

Higher net gains on sale of loans by $5.4 million principally at the BPNA segment due to a higher volume of loans sold; and

Lower adjustments to the indemnity reserves by $4.2 million mostly due to the indemnity reserve of $3.0 million recorded during the second quarter of 2013 at BPPR in connection to the sale of non-performing loans and a partial reserve release at BPNA during this quarter, partially offset by higher provision for loans subject to credit recourse at BPPR.

160


Table of Contents

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 non-interest income decreased $160.2 million. Excluding the two significant transactions discussed above and the bulk sale of non-performing assets during the first quarter of 2013, which had a negative impact in non-interest income of $72.2 million, the non-interest income decreased by $71.3 million.

Lower other operating income by $157.9 million primarily due to the gain of $162.1 million during the second quarter of 2013 from EVERTEC’s IPO;

Unfavorable variance in FDIC loss share (expense) income of $49.4 million due mainly to the same factors described above for the quarterly results. The amortization of the indemnification asset increased by $42.3 million when compared to the same period of 2013, driven by an increase in expected cash flows. Additionally, lower mirror accounting of credit impairment losses by $13.9 million partially offset by a favorable variance in the fair value adjustment of the true-up payment obligation of $7.2 million also contributed to the higher expense. Refer to Table 6 for a breakdown of FDIC loss share (expenses) income by major categories; and

Lower mortgage banking activities revenues by $30.9 million mainly due to the unfavorable variance in realized gains / (losses) on closed derivative positions and higher unfavorable valuation adjustments on mortgage servicing rights at BPPR segment. Refer to Table 5 for details of mortgage banking activities.

These unfavorable variances were partially offset by:

Positive variance of $72.5 million in net gain (loss) on sale of loans held-for-sale, net of valuation adjustment, that was mainly due to effect of the $61.4 million loss at BPPR resulting from the bulk sale of non-performing commercial and construction loans during the first quarter of 2013, which included an unfavorable valuation adjustment on loans held-for-sale transferred to held-in-portfolio of approximately $8.8 million;

Lower provision for indemnity reserves on loans sold by $10.0 million mainly due to the effect of the $13.7 million reserves established at BPPR in connection with the previously mentioned bulk sales of non-performing assets completed during the first and second quarters of 2013, of which $2.0 million was reversed during the first quarter of 2014, in addition to the reserve release of $1.2 million at BPNA during this quarter; and

Net positive change in trading account profit / (loss) by $8.4 million at BPPR segment due to higher volume of MBS outstanding at higher market values.

161


Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of the revenues and expenses derived from the assets acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction during the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

Table 6—Financial Information—Westernbank FDIC-Assisted Transaction

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance

Interest income on covered loans

$ 82,975 $ 70,136 $ 12,839 $ 164,073 $ 142,320 $ 21,753

FDIC loss share (expense) income :

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

(72,095 ) (38,557 ) (33,538 ) (121,041 ) (78,761 ) (42,280 )

80% mirror accounting on credit impairment losses [1]

10,372 25,338 (14,966 ) 25,462 39,383 (13,921 )

80% mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses

11,085 12,131 (1,046 ) 23,830 19,914 3,916

80% mirror accounting on recoveries on covered assets, including rental income on OREOs, subject to reimbursement to the FDIC

(3,557 ) (2,168 ) (1,389 ) (7,949 ) (3,269 ) (4,680 )

80% mirror accounting on amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments

(193 ) 193 (386 ) 386

Change in true-up payment obligation

(1,206 ) (476 ) (730 ) (38 ) (7,251 ) 7,213

Other

140 170 (30 ) 269 349 (80 )

Total FDIC loss share (expense) income

(55,261 ) (3,755 ) (51,506 ) (79,467 ) (30,021 ) (49,446 )

Amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments (included in other operating income)

242 (242 ) 484 (484 )

Total revenues

27,714 66,623 (38,909 ) 84,606 112,783 (28,177 )

Provision for loan losses

11,604 25,500 (13,896 ) 37,318 43,056 (5,738 )

Total revenues less provision for loan losses

$ 16,110 $ 41,123 $ (25,013 ) $ 47,288 $ 69,727 $ (22,439 )

[1] Reductions in expected cash flows for ASC 310-30 loans, which may impact the provision for loan losses, may consider reductions in both principal and interest cash flow expectations. The amount covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements for interest not collected from borrowers is limited under the agreements (approximately 90 days); accordingly, these amounts are not subject fully to the 80% mirror accounting.

Average balances

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In millions)

2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance

Covered loans

$ 2,811 $ 3,269 $ (458 ) $ 2,872 $ 3,391 $ (519 )

FDIC loss share asset

792 1,376 (584 ) 846 1,385 (539 )

Operating Expenses

Refer to Table 7 for a breakdown of operating expenses by major categories. Operating expenses decreased by $18.4 million when compared to the same quarter of 2013 due to the following factors:

Lower FDIC deposit insurances expenses by $8.1 million resulting from improvements in assets quality and earnings trends.

Lower personnel costs by $7.3 million mainly at BPPR mostly related to lower pension and postretirement expenses due to actuarial revisions, and lower hospital and life insurance expenses.

Lower other real estate (OREO) expenses by $4.2 million due to lower maintenance expenses and lower rental income as a result of OREO properties sold, partially offset by higher subsequent write-downs during this quarter.

Lower other operating expenses by $2.3 million due to a sundry reserve release of approximately $1.4 million at BPNA during the second quarter of 2014.

These decreases were partially offset by higher restructuring costs by $4.6 million related to the PCB reorganization. Refer to Note 4 for a detail of restructuring charges.

162


Table of Contents

Operating expenses decreased by $56.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013, due to the following main factors:

Lower OREO expenses by $43.7 million mainly at BPPR due to the loss of $37.0 million from the bulk sale of commercial and single family real estate owned recognized during the first quarter of 2013.

Lower personnel costs by $10.5 million mostly at BPPR driven by lower pension and postretirement expenses due to actuarial revisions, partially offset by higher 401K savings plan expenses due to the restoration of the Corporation’s matching contribution to the plan in April 2013.

Lower FDIC deposit insurance expense by $5.5 million resulting from improvements in assets quality and earnings trends.

These decreases were partially offset by higher restructuring costs by $4.6 million related to the PCB reorganization.

Table 7—Operating Expenses

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 Variance 2014 2013 Variance

Personnel costs:

Salaries

$ 69,149 $ 68,585 $ 564 $ 138,187 $ 136,207 $ 1,980

Commissions, incentives and other bonuses

12,862 14,704 (1,842 ) 25,961 29,477 (3,516 )

Pension, postretirement and medical insurance

7,532 13,911 (6,379 ) 16,233 28,224 (11,991 )

Other personnel costs, including payroll taxes

9,557 9,159 398 23,020 20,032 2,988

Total personnel costs

99,100 106,359 (7,259 ) 203,401 213,940 (10,539 )

Net occupancy expenses

20,267 21,059 (792 ) 41,627 41,551 76

Equipment expenses

12,044 11,485 559 23,456 23,105 351

Other taxes

13,543 15,225 (1,682 ) 27,206 26,753 453

Professional fees:

Collections, appraisals and other credit related fees

6,652 7,915 (1,263 ) 12,972 17,629 (4,657 )

Programming, processing and other technology services

43,533 42,872 661 86,218 85,521 697

Other professional fees

16,839 16,228 611 34,833 31,602 3,231

Total professional fees

67,024 67,015 9 134,023 134,752 - 729

Communications

6,425 6,395 30 13,110 12,946 164

Business promotion

16,038 15,357 681 27,424 27,942 (518 )

FDIC deposit insurance

10,480 18,557 (8,077 ) 21,458 26,913 (5,455 )

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

3,410 7,657 (4,247 ) 9,850 53,524 (43,674 )

Other operating expenses:

Credit and debit card processing, volume and interchange expenses

5,640 5,096 544 10,836 9,801 1,035

Transportation and travel

1,586 1,756 (170 ) 3,176 3,165 11

Printing and supplies

955 1,035 (80 ) 1,645 1,815 (170 )

Operational losses

1,945 3,577 (1,632 ) 7,480 7,095 385

All other

10,383 11,302 (919 ) 19,721 21,808 (2,087 )

Total other operating expenses

20,509 22,766 (2,257 ) 42,858 43,684 (826 )

Amortization of intangibles

2,025 1,989 36 4,051 3,979 72

Restructuring costs

4,574 4,574 4,574 4,574

Total operating expenses

$ 275,439 $ 293,864 $ (18,425 ) $ 553,038 $ 609,089 $ (56,051 )

INCOME TAXES

Income tax benefit amounted to $4.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared with $237.4 million for the same quarter of 2013. The decrease in income tax benefit was primarily due to the recognition during the second quarter of 2013 of $215.6 million in income tax benefit and a corresponding increase in the net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico operations as the result of the increase in the marginal tax rate from 30% to 39% per Act Number 40 of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.

During the second quarter of 2014 the Corporation entered into a Closing Agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury. The Agreement, among other matters, was related to the income tax treatment of certain charge-offs related to the loans acquired from Westernbank as part of the FDIC assisted transaction in the year 2010. As a result of the Agreement, the Corporation recorded a tax benefit of $23.4 million due to a reduction in the deferred tax liability associated with the Westernbank loan portfolio. Additionally, in connection with this Closing, the Corporation made an estimated tax payment of $45 million which will be used as a credit to offset future income tax liabilities.

163


Table of Contents

This benefit was partially offset by the negative impact of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $9.2 million recorded at the Holding Company, due to the difference in the tax treatment of the interest expense related to the TARP funds and the newly issued $450 million senior notes, bearing interest at 7%. The previous interest expense on the TARP funds was not deductible for purposes of calculating taxable income. However, interest expense on the $450 million term notes will be deductible for purposes of the calculation; increasing the loss in the Holding Company on a stand-alone basis. The Holding Company’s lack of taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences after deducting the interest expense generated on the notes represents strong negative evidence within management’s evaluation of the realizability of that entity’s deferred tax asset. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely that not that the Holding Company will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax asset, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740, therefore recorded a full valuation allowance against it.

On July1, 2014, the Government of Puerto Rico approved an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, which among other things, changed the income tax rate for capital gains from 15% to 20%. As a result, the Corporation expects to recognize an income tax expense of approximately $20.0 million during the third quarter of 2014, mainly related to the deferred tax liability associated with the portfolio acquired from Westernbank.

The components of income tax benefit for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are included in the following table:

Table 8 – Components of Income Tax Benefit—Quarter

Quarters ended
June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Amount % of pre-tax
income
Amount % of pre-tax
income

Computed income tax at statutory rates

$ (130,147 ) 39 % $ 29,168 39 %

Net benefit of net tax exempt interest income

(13,558 ) 4 (10,325 ) (14 )

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

(7,211 ) 2 (2,958 ) (4 )

Non-deductible expenses

169,810 (50 ) 7,946 11

Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions

(4,293 ) 1 (2,588 ) (3 )

Initial adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate

(215,600 ) (288 )

Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate [1]

(20,833 ) 6 (47,322 ) (63 )

Others

2,108 (1 ) 4,299 5

Income tax benefit

$ (4,124 ) 1 % $ (237,380 ) (317 )%

[1] For 2014, includes the impact of the Closing Agreement with the P.R. Treasury signed in June 2014.

Income tax expense amounted to $19.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared with an income tax benefit of $294.3 million for the same period of 2013. The increase in income tax expense was primarily due to the recognition during the year 2013 of a tax benefit and a corresponding increase in the net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico operations as result of the increase in the marginal tax rate from 30% to 39% as mention above. In addition, during 2013 the income tax benefit increased due to the loss generated on the Puerto Rico operations by the sale of non-performing assets net of the gain realized on the sale of EVERTEC’s common stock.

164


Table of Contents

Table 9 – Components of Income Tax Expense (Benefit) – Year-to-Date

Six months ended
June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Amount % of pre-tax
income
Amount % of pre-tax
income

Computed income tax at statutory rates

$ (95,138 ) 39 % $ (43,731 ) 39 %

Net benefit of net tax exempt interest income

(24,944 ) 10 (19,876 ) 18

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

(14,183 ) 6 (2,975 ) 3

Non-deductible expenses

178,129 (73 ) 15,759 (14 )

Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions

(10,488 ) 4 (5,948 ) 5

Initial adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate

(197,467 ) 176

Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate [1]

(18,555 ) 8 (45,313 ) 40

Others

4,319 (2 ) 5,294 (5 )

Income tax expense (benefit)

$ 19,140 (8 )% $ (294,257 ) 262 %

[1] For 2014, includes the impact of the Closing Agreement with the P.R. Treasury signed in June 2014.

Refer to Note 34 to the consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of the Corporation’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2014.

REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS

The Corporation’s reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. These reportable segments pertain only to the continuing operations of Popular, Inc. As previously indicated in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida were classified as discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2014. A Corporate group has been defined to support the reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the Corporate group are not allocated to the reportable segments.

For a description of the Corporation’s reportable segments, including additional financial information and the underlying management accounting process, refer to Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Corporate group reported a net loss of $451.4 million for the second quarter and $471.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared with a net income of $137.0 million for the second quarter and $107.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The unfavorable variance at the Corporate group was mainly due to the accelerated amortization of $414.1 million of the discount and deferred costs associated with the TARP funds, which were repaid in July 2, 2014 and the after-tax gain of approximately $156.6 million recognized during the second quarter of 2013, in connection with EVERTEC’s IPO.

Highlights on the earnings results for the reportable segments are discussed below:

165


Table of Contents

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment’s net income amounted to $71.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared with a net income of $160.1 million for the same quarter of the previous year. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

higher net interest income by $19.3 million, or 24 basis points, mostly due to:

an increase of $12.8 million in income from the covered portfolio due to loan resolutions and higher expected cash flows, partially offset by lower levels due to the continued resolution of that portfolio;

higher income from commercial loans of $4.4 million due to higher volumes and higher yields after the bulk sale of non-performing commercial loans during the first quarter of 2013;

an increase of $3.1 million on income from consumer loans due to the loan purchase of $90.0 million completed during the first quarter of 2014 and higher volume of auto loans;

lower interest expense from deposits by $3.8 million, or a lower cost of 10 basis points, mainly from individual retirement accounts and brokered CD’s related to renewal of maturities at lower prevailing rates and to lower volume of deposits; and

lower cost of borrowings by $4.7 million mainly due to the conversion into shares of common stock of $185 million in subordinated notes due to Popular, Inc. during the fourth quarter of 2013.

Partially offsetting the favorable variances in net interest income was a reduction of approximately $6.0 million in interest income from mortgage loans due to lower volumes and $1.8 million on investment securities also caused by lower volumes of mortgage backed securities. The net interest margin was 5.50% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to 5.26% for the same period in 2013;

lower provision for loan losses by $169.5 million, or 66%, mostly due to the decrease in the provision for loan losses on the non-covered loan portfolio of $155.6 million, mainly related to the $169.2 million impact of the bulk sale of non-performing mortgage loans during the second quarter of 2013. Excluding the impact of the sale, the provision for loan losses for the non-covered portfolio increased by $13.6 million, due to macro-economic conditions in Puerto Rico and reserves for commercial and public sector exposures, offset by the reserve releases due to the annual review of the components of the allowance for loan losses. The provision for the covered portfolio declined by $13.9 million driven by lower impairment losses on loan pools accounted for under ASC 310-30;

lower non-interest income by $64.8 million, or 63%, mainly due to:

higher FDIC loss share expense by $51.5 million (refer to Table 6 for components of this variance). During the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation revised its analysis of expected cash flows which resulted in a net decrease of approximately $102.9 million in estimated credit losses, driven mainly by certain commercial loan pools. Although this is expected to have a positive impact on the Corporation’s interest accretion in future periods, the carrying value of the indemnification asset was amortized to reflect lower levels of expected losses. Lower mirror accounting on credit impairment losses during the quarter also contributed to higher FDIC loss share expense, and

lower income from mortgage banking activities by $ 14.3 million mainly due to higher losses on closed derivative positions and unfavorable fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights, offset by higher gains on securitization transactions.

The negative variances in non-interest income detailed above were partially offset by:

higher trading account income by $ 5.3 million due to higher volume of mortgage backed securities at higher market values, and

lower provisions for indemnity reserves by $2.2 million due to the $3.0 million provision recorded during the second quarter of 2013 related to the bulk sale of non-performing mortgage loans,

166


Table of Contents
lower operating expenses by $15.0 million, or 6%, mainly due to lower personnel costs by $6.8 million mostly due to lower pension and postretirement expenses due to changes to actuarial assumptions in pension obligations, and medical and life insurance expenses; and lower FDIC deposit insurance expense by $8.0 million due to improved asset quality and earnings trends

lower income tax benefit by $227.8 million, mainly due to the change in statutory tax rate from 30% to 39% during the second quarter of 2013, resulting in a tax benefit of $214.2 million, as compared to a benefit of $23.4 million recognized during the second quarter of 2014, in connection with a Closing Agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury

Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 amounted to $136.3 million, compared to $51.3 million for the same period of the previous year. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

higher net interest income by $42.2 million, or 28 basis points, mostly due to:

an increase of $21.8 million in income from the covered portfolio due to loan resolutions and higher expected cash flows, partially offset by lower levels due to the continued resolution of that portfolio;

higher income from commercial loans of $10.9 million due to higher volumes and higher yields after the bulk sale of non-performing commercial loans during the first quarter of 2013;

an increase of $3.1 million on income from consumer loans due to the loan purchase of $90 million in consumer loans during the first quarter of 2014 and higher volume of auto loans;

lower interest expense from deposits by $8.9 million, or a lower cost of 11 basis points, mainly from individual retirement accounts and brokered CD’s related to renewal of maturities at lower prevailing rates and to lower volume of deposits; and

lower cost of borrowings by $9.0 million mainly due to the conversion into shares of common stock of $185 million in subordinated notes due to Popular, Inc. during the fourth quarter of 2013.

Partially offsetting the favorable variances in net interest income was a reduction of approximately $2.2 million and $3.2 million in construction and mortgage loans income, respectively, due to lower volumes and $4.3 million lower income on investment securities also caused by lower volumes of mortgage backed securities and US Government Agencies. The net interest margin was 5.50% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 5.22% for the same period in 2013;

lower provision for loan losses by $311.6 million, or 65%, mostly due to the decrease in the provision for loan losses on the non-covered loan portfolio of $306.0 million, mainly related to the incremental provision of $148.8 million and $169.2 million related to the bulk sales of non-performing loans during the first and second quarters of 2013. Excluding the impact of the sales, the provision for loan losses for the non-covered portfolio increased by $6.4 million, due to macro-economic conditions in Puerto Rico and reserves for commercial and public sector exposures, offset by the reserve releases due to the annual review of the components of the allowance for loan losses. The provision for the covered portfolio declined by $5.7 million driven by lower impairment losses on loan pools accounted for under ASC 310-30; and

lower non-interest income by $13.1 million, or 11%, mainly due to:

Higher FDIC loss share expense by $49.4 million mainly due to higher amortization of the indemnification asset and lower mirror accounting on credit impairment losses, as discussed above; and

Lower income from mortgage banking activities by $ 30.9 million mainly due to higher losses on closed derivative positions and unfavorable fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights, offset by higher gains on securitization transactions.

The negative variances in non-interest income detailed above were partially offset by:

Lower losses on sale of loans by $59.6 million due to the impact of the sales of non performing loans completed during 2013;

167


Table of Contents
Higher trading account income by $8.4 million due to higher volume of mortgage backed securities at higher market values;

Lower provisions for indemnity reserves by $6.8 million due to the $13.7 million aggregate provision recorded during the first and second quarters of 2013 related to the bulk sale of non-performing assets

Lower operating expenses by $55.0 million, or 11%, mainly due to lower OREO expenses due to the $37.0 million write down recorded in connection with the sale of non-performing assets during the first quarter of 2013, lower personnel costs by $10.5 million mostly due to lower pension and postretirement expenses due to changes to actuarial assumptions in pension obligations, and medical and life insurance expenses; and lower FDIC deposit insurance expense by $5.5 million due to improved asset quality and earnings trends.

Income tax expense was $21.9 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $288.6 million. The unfavorable variance of $310.5 million was mainly due higher income during 2014 and the change in statutory tax rate from 30% to 39% during the second quarter of 2013, resulting in a tax benefit of $214.2 million, as compared to a benefit of $23.4 million recognized during the second quarter of 2014, in connection with a Closing Agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury.

Banco Popular North America

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the reportable segment of Banco Popular North America reported net income from continuing operations of $50.9 million, compared with $15.4 million for the same quarter of the previous year. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

higher net interest income by $2.2 million, or 5%, mainly impacted by lower interest expense from deposits by $2.4 million, or a lower cost of 27 basis points, driven by the renewal of maturities from time deposits at lower prevailing rates. The BPNA reportable segment’s net interest margin was 3.25% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared with 3.12% for the same period in 2013;

higher reversal of provision for loan losses by $23.3 million, principally as a result of improved credit performance. Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for certain quality indicators and further explanations corresponding to the BPNA reportable segment;

higher non-interest income by $10.1 million, mostly due to higher gains on sale of loans by $8.4 million related to a higher volume of sales of non-performing commercial loans; and lower provision for indemnity reserves by $2.0 million.

higher operating expenses by $0.1 million, reflecting $4.6 million in restructuring charges incurred during the second quarter of 2014, related to the reorganization of PCB, partially offset by a favorable variance of $3.1 million in OREO expense due to sales of commercial OREOs.

Net income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 amounted to $72.0 million, compared to $23.0 million for the same period of the previous year. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

higher net interest income by $7.2 million, or 8%, mainly impacted by lower interest expense from deposits by $5.1 million, or a lower cost of 29 basis points, driven by the renewal of maturities from time deposits at lower prevailing rates and higher income from collection of construction loans which were in non-accrual status by $2.5 million. The BPNA reportable segment’s net interest margin was 3.33% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared with 3.14% for the same period in 2013;

168


Table of Contents
favorable variance in the provision for loan losses by $27.9 million, principally as a result of improved credit performance, as mentioned above.

higher non-interest income by $14.4 million, mostly due to higher gains on sale of loans by $12.9 million related to a higher volume of sales of non-performing commercial loans; and lower provision for indemnity reserves for $3.2 million, partially offset by lower service charges on deposits by $1.9 million

higher operating expenses by $0.7 million, reflecting $4.6 million in restructuring charges incurred during the second quarter of 2014, related to the reorganization of PCB, partially offset by a favorable variance of $2.5 million in OREO expense due to sales of commercial OREOs and lower personnel costs by $1.4 million.

FINANCIAL CONDITION ANALYSIS

Assets

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation reclassified $1.8 billion in assets and $2.1 billion in liabilities to discontinued operations in the statement of financial condition as part of the reorganization of PCB. Refer to Note 3 for details of discontinued operations.

The Corporation’s total assets were $36.6 billion at June 30, 2014 and $35.7 billion at December 31, 2013. Refer to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition as of such dates.

Money market investments, trading and investment securities

Money market investments totaled $1.7 billion at June 30, 2014, compared to $858.5 million at December 31, 2013. The increase was mainly due to liquidity held in anticipation of the TARP repayment.

Trading account securities amounted to $346 million at June 30, 2014, compared to $340 million at December 31, 2013. Refer to the Market Risk section of this MD&A for a table that provides a breakdown of the trading portfolio by security type.

Investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity amounted to $5.8 billion at June 30, 2014, compared with $5.4 billion at December 31, 2013. The increase in investment securities available-for-sale is mainly reflected in the categories of Obligations of US Government sponsored entities. At June 30, 2014, the investment securities available-for-sale portfolio was in unrealized net gain position of $4.3 million, compared with an unrealized net loss position of $51.1 million at December 31, 2013.

169


Table of Contents

Table 10 provides a breakdown of the Corporation’s portfolio of investment securities available-for-sale (“AFS”) and held-to-maturity (“HTM”) on a combined basis. Also, Notes 7 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements provide additional information with respect to the Corporation’s investment securities AFS and HTM. The portfolio of Obligations of the Puerto Rico Government is comprised of securities with specific sources of income or revenues identified for repayments. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality review on these issuers.

Table 10—Breakdown of Investment Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013 Variance

U.S. Treasury securities

$ 27,729 $ 28,482 $ (753 )

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

2,217,230 1,629,205 588,025

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

181,846 180,258 1,588

Collateralized mortgage obligations

2,303,707 2,418,924 (115,217 )

Mortgage-backed securities

1,020,048 1,135,641 (115,593 )

Equity securities

4,343 4,116 227

Others

13,369 38,670 (25,301 )

Total investment securities AFS and HTM

$ 5,768,272 $ 5,435,296 $ 332,976

Loans

Refer to Table 11, for a breakdown of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, the principal category of earning assets. Loans covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements are presented separately in Table 11. The risks on covered loans are significantly different as a result of the loss protection provided by the FDIC. The loss share agreement applicable to commercial (including construction) and consumer loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years expiring at the end of the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Also, refer to Note 9 for detailed information about the Corporation’s loan portfolio composition and loan purchases and sales.

The Corporation’s total loan portfolio amounted to $22.5 billion at June 30, 2014 compared to $24.7 billion at December 31, 2013. Excluding the reclassification of $1.8 billion in loans to discontinued operations, the total loan portfolio decreased by $454 million mainly in the covered loan portfolio due to the continuation of loan resolutions and the normal portfolio run-off.

170


Table of Contents

Table 11—Loans Ending Balances

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013 Variance

Loans not covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements:

Commercial

$ 8,155,547 $ 10,037,184 $ (1,881,637 )

Construction

179,059 206,084 (27,025 )

Legacy [1]

162,941 211,135 (48,194 )

Lease financing

546,868 543,761 3,107

Mortgage

6,664,448 6,681,476 (17,028 )

Consumer

3,926,361 3,932,226 (5,865 )

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

19,635,224 21,611,866 (1,976,642 )

Loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements:

Commercial

1,745,967 1,812,804 (66,837 )

Construction

82,763 190,127 (107,364 )

Mortgage

867,075 934,373 (67,298 )

Consumer

40,297 47,123 (6,826 )

Total covered loans held-in-portfolio

2,736,102 2,984,427 (248,325 )

Total loans held-in-portfolio

22,371,326 24,596,293 (2,224,967 )

Loans held-for-sale:

Commercial

2,895 603 2,292

Construction

949 949

Mortgage

93,166 109,823 (16,657 )

Total loans held-for-sale

97,010 110,426 (13,416 )

Total loans

$ 22,468,336 $ 24,706,719 $ (2,238,383 )

[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

Non-covered loans

The non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to $19.6 billion at June 30, 2014 compared to $21.6 billion at December 31, 2013. Excluding the $1.8 billion loans reclassified to discontinued operations, non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased by $192.6 million, mainly in the BPPR commercial loan portfolio primarily as a result of a reduction in the public sector.

The loans held-for-sale portfolio reflected a decrease of $13.4 million from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014; the decrease was mostly at BPPR segment driven by mortgage loans securitized and sold during the quarter.

Covered loans

The covered loans portfolio amounted to $2.7 billion at June 30, 2014, compared to $3.0 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease of $248.3 million was mainly due to loan resolutions and the normal portfolio run-off. Refer to Table 11 for a breakdown of the covered loans by major loan type categories. Tables 12 and 13 provide the activity in the carrying amount and outstanding discount on the covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30. The outstanding accretable discount is impacted by increases in cash flow expectations on the loan pool based on quarterly revisions of the portfolio. The increase in the accretable discount is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of each applicable loan pool.

171


Table of Contents

Table 12—Activity in the Carrying Amount of Covered Loans Accounted for Under ASC 310-30

Quarter ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Beginning balance

$ 2,733,122 $ 3,157,663 $ 2,827,947 $ 3,491,759

Accretion

79,863 62,536 158,981 127,526

Collections / charge-offs

(202,321 ) (207,333 ) (376,264 ) (606,419 )

Ending balance

$ 2,610,664 $ 3,012,866 $ 2,610,664 $ 3,012,866

Allowance for loan losses (ALLL)

(90,892 ) (91,195 ) (90,892 ) (91,195 )

Ending balance, net of ALLL

$ 2,519,772 $ 2,921,671 $ 2,519,772 $ 2,921,671

Table 13—Activity in the Accretable Yield on Covered Loans Accounted for Under ASC 310-30

Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Beginning balance

$ 1,218,212 $ 1,372,135 $ 1,309,205 $ 1,451,669

Accretion [1]

(79,863 ) (62,536 ) (158,981 ) (127,526 )

Change in expected cash flows

142,409 70,013 130,534 55,469

Ending balance

$ 1,280,758 $ 1,379,612 $ 1,280,758 $ 1,379,612

[1] Positive to earnings, which is included in interest income.

FDIC loss share asset

Table 14 sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss share asset for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Table 14 – Activity of Loss Share Asset

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 833,721 $ 1,380,592 $ 948,608 $ 1,399,098

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

(72,095 ) (38,557 ) (121,041 ) (78,761 )

Credit impairment losses to be covered under loss sharing agreements

10,372 25,338 25,462 39,383

Decrease due to reciprocal accounting on amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments

(193 ) (386 )

Reimbursable expenses

11,085 12,131 23,830 19,914

Payments to (from) FDIC under loss sharing agreements

(31,530 ) (112,857 ) 107

Other adjustments attributable to FDIC loss sharing agreements

31 (12,449 ) (13 )

Balance at end of period

$ 751,553 $ 1,379,342 $ 751,553 $ 1,379,342

The FDIC loss share indemnification asset is recognized on the same basis as the assets subject to the loss share protection from the FDIC, except that the amortization / accretion terms differ. Decreases in expected reimbursements from the FDIC due to improvements in expected cash flows to be received from borrowers, as compared with the initial estimates, are recognized as a reduction to non-interest income prospectively over the life of the loss share agreements. This is because the indemnification asset balance is being reduced to the expected reimbursement amount from the FDIC. Table 15 presents the activity associated with the outstanding balance of the FDIC loss share asset amortization (or negative discount) for the periods presented.

Table 15—Activity in the Remaining FDIC Loss Share Asset Discount

Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance at beginning of period [1]

$ 71,634 $ 128,682 $ 103,691 $ 141,800

Amortization of negative discount [2]

(72,095 ) (38,557 ) (121,041 ) (78,761 )

Impact of lower projected losses

106,400 31,999 123,289 59,085

Balance at end of period

$ 105,939 $ 122,124 $ 105,939 $ 122,124

[1] Positive balance represents negative discount (debit to assets), while a negative balance represents a discount (credit to assets).
[2] Amortization results in a negative impact to non-interest income, while a positive balance results in a positive impact to non-interest income, particularly FDIC loss share (expense) income.

172


Table of Contents

During the second quarter, the Corporation revised its analysis of expected cash flow which resulted in a net decrease of approximately $102.9 million in estimated credit losses, which was driven mainly by commercial loan pools. The lowered loss estimates requires the Corporation to amortize the loss share asset to its currently lower expected collectible balance, thus resulting in negative accretion. Due to the shorter life of the indemnity asset compared with the expected life of the covered loans, this negative accretion temporarily offsets the benefit of higher cash flows accounted through the accretable yield on the loans.

Other real estate owned

Other real estate owned (OREO) represents real estate property received in satisfaction of debt. At June 30, 2014, OREO decreased to $295 million from $304 million at December 31, 2013. Refer to Table 16 for the activity in other real estate owned. The amounts included as “covered other real estate” are subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements.

Table 16—Other Real Estate Owned Activity

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014
Non-covered Non-covered Covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 48,141 $ 88,824 $ 110,333 $ 48,414 $ 295,712

Write-downs in value

(571 ) (439 ) (6,635 ) (940 ) (8,585 )

Additions

6,303 15,400 22,260 4,103 48,066

Sales

(5,372 ) (12,203 ) (14,792 ) (3,777 ) (36,144 )

Other adjustments

1,286 (1,949 ) (3,261 ) 100 (3,824 )

Ending balance

$ 49,787 $ 89,633 $ 107,905 $ 47,900 $ 295,225

For the six months ended June 30, 2014
Non-covered Non-covered Covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 48,649 $ 86,852 $ 120,215 $ 47,792 $ 303,508

Write-downs in value

(785 ) (1,108 ) (11,198 ) (1,147 ) (14,238 )

Additions

10,971 30,283 35,454 8,594 85,302

Sales

(10,334 ) (24,266 ) (33,213 ) (6,154 ) (73,967 )

Other adjustments

1,286 (2,128 ) (3,353 ) (1,185 ) (5,380 )

Ending balance

$ 49,787 $ 89,633 $ 107,905 $ 47,900 $ 295,225

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013
Non-covered Non-covered Covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 79,146 $ 75,553 $ 129,413 $ 42,965 $ 327,077

Write-downs in value

(987 ) (462 ) (3,568 ) (1,482 ) (6,499 )

Additions

3,940 30,337 16,879 8,064 59,220

Sales

(17,264 ) (13,154 ) (3,839 ) (5,208 ) (39,465 )

Other adjustments

290 1,521 1 1,812

Ending balance

$ 65,125 $ 93,795 $ 138,885 $ 44,340 $ 342,145

For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Non-covered Non-covered Covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 135,862 $ 130,982 $ 99,398 $ 39,660 $ 405,902

Write-downs in value

(5,886 ) (7,820 ) (6,673 ) (1,785 ) (22,164 )

Additions

22,258 55,185 51,674 17,037 146,154

Sales

(87,399 ) (85,171 ) (5,514 ) (10,464 ) (188,548 )

Other adjustments

290 619 (108 ) 801

Ending balance

$ 65,125 $ 93,795 $ 138,885 $ 44,340 $ 342,145

173


Table of Contents

Other assets

Table 17 provides a breakdown of the principal categories that comprise the caption of “Other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table 17—Breakdown of Other Assets

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013 Variance

Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance)

$ 788,732 $ 761,768 $ 26,964

Investments under the equity method

214,452 197,006 17,446

Bank-owned life insurance program

230,570 228,805 1,765

Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment

379 383 (4 )

Prepaid taxes

210,079 91,504 118,575

Other prepaid expenses

73,886 67,108 6,778

Derivative assets

27,559 34,710 (7,151 )

Trades receivable from brokers and counterparties

519,495 71,680 447,815

Others

227,208 234,594 (7,386 )

Total other assets

$ 2,292,360 $ 1,687,558 $ 604,802

The increase in other assets from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014 of $604.8 million was mainly due to $450.0 million on trade receivables due to the issuance of senior notes raised near the end of the second quarter with a settlement date of July 1, 2014, to partially fund the repayment of the $935 million in trust preferred securities under TARP.

Also, prepaid taxes increased by $118.6 million mostly due to the payment of $45 million in income taxes in connection with the Closing Agreement signed with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury on June 30, 2014, and $37.8 million of corporate personal property tax and municipal tax paid during the quarter, to be amortized over the next twelve months.

Goodwill

The decrease in goodwill from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014 of $187 million was the result of the non-cash write-down of the goodwill allocated, on a relative fair value basis, to the discontinued U.S. businesses. Refer to Note 16 for detailed information about the Corporation’s goodwill and other intangible assets and Note 3 for more information about the discontinued U.S businesses.

174


Table of Contents

Deposits and Borrowings

The composition of the Corporation’s financing sources to total assets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is included in Table 18.

Table 18—Financing to Total Assets

June 30, December 31, % increase (decrease) % of total assets

(In millions)

2014 2013 from 2013 to 2014 2014 2013

Non-interest bearing deposits

$ 5,667 $ 5,923 (4.3 )% 15.5 % 16.6 %

Interest-bearing core deposits

14,778 16,026 (7.8 ) 40.4 44.8

Other interest-bearing deposits

4,456 4,762 (6.4 ) 12.2 13.3

Fed funds purchased and repurchase agreements

2,075 1,659 25.1 5.7 4.6

Other short-term borrowings

31 401 (92.3 ) 0.1 1.1

Notes payable

2,360 1,585 48.9 6.4 4.4

Other liabilities

881 767 14.9 2.4 2.2

Liabilities from discontinued operations

2,080 5.7

Stockholders’ equity

4,260 4,626 (7.9 ) 11.6 13.0

Deposits

The Corporation’s deposits totaled $24.9 billion at June 30, 2014 compared to $26.7 billion at December 31, 2013. Excluding the reclassification of $2.1 billion in deposits to discontinued operations, deposits increased by $248.3 million mainly in demand deposit. Refer to Table 19 for a breakdown of the Corporation’s deposits at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table 19—Deposits Ending Balances

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013 Variance

Demand deposits [1]

$ 6,412,632 $ 6,590,963 $ (178,331 )

Savings, NOW and money market deposits (non-brokered)

10,276,715 11,255,309 (978,594 )

Savings, NOW and money market deposits (brokered)

543,032 553,521 (10,489 )

Time deposits (non-brokered)

5,790,324 6,478,103 (687,779 )

Time deposits (brokered CDs)

1,878,449 1,833,249 45,200

Total deposits

$ 24,901,152 $ 26,711,145 $ (1,809,993 )

[1] Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits.

Borrowings

The Corporation’s borrowings amounted to $4.5 billion at June 30, 2014, compared with $3.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The increase is mainly the result of the accelerated amortization of the $414.1 million discount and deferred cost of the TARP related trust preferred securities, as well as the issuance of $450.0 million in senior notes. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the Corporation’s borrowings. Also, refer to the Liquidity section in this MD&A for additional information on the Corporation’s funding sources.

175


Table of Contents

Other liabilities

Other liabilities increased from $766.8 million at December 31, 2013 to $880.6 million at June 30, 2014. The increase was principally driven by unsettled trades payable at the end of the period accompanied by higher income tax payable at the BPPR segment.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity totaled $4.3 billion at June 30, 2014, compared with $4.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease resulted from the Corporation’s net loss of $424.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, principally triggered by the acceleration of the amortization of discount and deferred costs related to the TARP securities, partially offset by a decrease of $58.5 million in accumulated other comprehensive loss due to net unrealized gain (losses) in the portfolio of investments securities available-for-sale. Refer to the consolidated statements of financial condition, comprehensive income and of changes in stockholders’ equity for information on the composition of stockholders’ equity.

REGULATORY CAPITAL

The Corporation continues to exceed the well-capitalized guidelines under the federal banking regulations. The regulatory capital ratios and amounts of total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are presented on Table 20. As of such dates, BPPR and BPNA were well-capitalized.

Table 20—Capital Adequacy Data

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Risk-based capital:

Tier I capital

$ 4,591,753 $ 4,464,742

Supplementary (Tier II) capital

348,485 296,813

Total capital

$ 4,940,238 $ 4,761,555

Minimum Total capital requirement to be well capitalized

2,387,307 2,331,867

Excess Total capital

$ 2,552,931 $ 2,429,688

Risk-weighted assets:

Balance sheet items

$ 22,083,255 $ 21,409,548

Off-balance sheet items

1,789,813 1,909,126

Total risk-weighted assets

$ 23,873,068 $ 23,318,674

Adjusted quarterly average assets

$ 35,132,145 $ 34,746,137

Ratios [1]:

Tier I capital (minimum required – 4.00%)

19.23 % 19.15 %

Total capital (minimum required – 8.00%)

20.69 20.42

Leverage ratio [2]

13.07 12.85

[1] The well-capitalized requirement for a bank holding company under existing rules is a minimum ratio of Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of 6% and Total capital to risk-weighted assets of 10%.
[2] All banks are required to have a minimum Tier 1 Leverage ratio of 3% or 4% of adjusted quarterly average assets, depending on the bank’s classification. At June 30, 2014, the capital adequacy minimum requirement for Popular, Inc. was (in thousands): Total capital of $ 1,909,845; Tier 1 capital of $ 954,923; and Tier 1 Leverage of $ 1,053,964, based on a 3% ratio, or $ 1,405,286, based on a 4% ratio, according to the entity’s classification.

The increase in the regulatory capital ratios from December 31, 2013 was driven mainly by the impact of the current six months period earnings, excluding the effect of the non-cash goodwill impairment charge which had no impact in total capital for regulatory capital purposes and the acceleration of the unamortized discount of the TARP funds. This favorable impact was partially offset by a net increase in risk-weighted assets, which included the trade receivable booked as of June 30, 2014 as part of the senior note issuance trade date accounting, which was subject to a 100% risk-weight assignment.

176


Table of Contents

In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance under its existing general risk-based capital rules, the trust preferred securities represent restricted core capital elements and qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to certain quantitative limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1 capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25% of the sum of all core capital elements (including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s restricted core capital elements exceeded the 25% limitation as a result of the acceleration of the unamortized discount of the TARP funds and, as a result $45 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities were included as Tier 2 capital. At December 31, 2013, the Corporation’s restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25% limitation.

Non-GAAP financial measures

The tangible common equity ratio, tangible assets and tangible book value per common share, which are presented in the table that follows, are non-GAAP measures. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method of accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity, total assets or any other measure calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names.

Table 21 provides a reconciliation of total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and total assets to tangible assets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table 21—Reconciliation of Tangible Common Equity and Tangible Assets

(In thousands, except share or per share information)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Total stockholders’ equity

$ 4,260,441 $ 4,626,150

Less: Preferred stock

(50,160 ) (50,160 )

Less: Goodwill

(461,246 ) (647,757 )

Less: Other intangibles

(40,122 ) (45,132 )

Total tangible common equity

$ 3,708,913 $ 3,883,101

Total assets

$ 36,587,902 $ 35,749,333

Less: Goodwill

(461,246 ) (647,757 )

Less: Other intangibles

(40,122 ) (45,132 )

Total tangible assets

$ 36,086,534 $ 35,056,444

Tangible common equity to tangible assets

10.28 % 11.08 %

Common shares outstanding at end of period

103,472,979 103,397,699

Tangible book value per common share

$ 35.84 $ 37.56

The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is another non-GAAP measure. Ratios calculated based upon Tier 1 common equity have become a focus of regulators and investors, and management believes ratios based on Tier 1 common equity assist investors in analyzing the Corporation’s capital position.

Because Tier 1 common equity is not formally defined by GAAP or, unlike Tier 1 capital, codified in the federal banking regulations currently in place as of June 30, 2014, this measure is considered to be a non-GAAP financial measure. Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. To mitigate these limitations, the Corporation has procedures in place to calculate these measures using the appropriate GAAP or regulatory components. Although these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company, they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.

177


Table of Contents

Table 22 provides a reconciliation of the Corporation’s total common stockholders’ equity (GAAP) to Tier 1 common equity at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (non-GAAP).

Table 22—Reconciliation Tier 1 Common Equity

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Common stockholders’ equity

$ 4,210,281 $ 4,575,990

Less: Unrealized losses (gains) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax [1]

(4,071 ) 48,344

Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets [2]

(636,081 ) (626,570 )

Less: Disallowed goodwill and other intangible assets, net of deferred tax liability

(447,182 ) (643,185 )

Less: Aggregate adjusted carrying value of non-financial equity investments

(1,381 ) (1,442 )

Add: Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans and unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of tax [1]

103,263 104,302

Total Tier 1 common equity

$ 3,224,829 $ 3,457,439

Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets

13.51 % 14.83 %

[1] Under the current general risk-based capital rules, the effects of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (“AOCI”) items included in shareholders’ equity (for example, mark-to-market adjustments to the value of securities held in the available for sale portfolio) under U.S. GAAP are reversed for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios.
[2] Approximately $159 million of the Corporation’s $789 million of net deferred tax assets included as “Other assets” in the consolidated statement of financial condition at June 30, 2014 ($167 million and $762 million, respectively, at December 31, 2013), were included without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $636 million of such assets at June 30, 2014 ($627 million at December 31, 2013) exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as “disallowed deferred tax assets”, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital. The remaining $(6) million of the Corporation’s other net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2014 ($(32) million at December 31, 2013) represented primarily the following items: (a) the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines; (b) the deferred tax asset corresponding to the pension liability adjustment recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income; and (c) certain deferred tax liabilities associated with goodwill and other intangibles.

178


Table of Contents

As indicated previously, in July 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of $935 million in TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury, as well as repurchased the warrant owned by the U.S. Treasury at a price of $3 million. The associated $935 million of capital securities (trust preferred securities) qualify for regulatory capital treatment under the federal agencies risk-based standards. The Corporation’s pro-forma regulatory capital ratios and capital amounts assuming the repayment of the TARP funds had occurred as of June 30, 2014 are the following:

Table 23—Capital Adequacy Data—Pro-forma with TARP Repayment

Actual Pro-forma Pro-forma

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 effect June 30, 2014

Risk-based capital:

Tier I common equity [1]

$ 3,224,829 $ (3,000 ) $ 3,221,829

Additional Tier I capital

1,366,924 (890,162 ) 476,762

Total Tier I capital

$ 4,591,753 $ (893,162 ) $ 3,698,591

Supplementary (Tier II) capital

348,485 (50,350 ) 298,135

Total capital [2]

$ 4,940,238 $ (943,512 ) $ 3,996,726

Minimum Total capital requirement to be well capitalized

$ 2,387,307 $ (44,651 ) $ 2,342,656

Excess Total capital

$ 2,552,931 $ (898,861 ) $ 1,654,070

Risk-weighted assets:

Balance sheet items [3]

$ 22,083,255 $ (446,512 ) $ 21,636,743

Off-balance sheet items

1,789,813 1,789,813

Total risk-weighted assets

$ 23,873,068 $ (446,512 ) $ 23,426,556

Adjusted quarterly average assets

$ 35,132,145 $ (24,231 ) $ 35,107,914

Ratios:

Tier I capital (minimum required – 4.00%)

19.23 % (3.44 ) 15.79 %

Total capital (minimum required – 8.00%)

20.69 (3.63 ) 17.06

Leverage ratio

13.07 (2.54 ) 10.53

Tier 1 common equity [4]

13.51 0.24 13.75

[1] Refer to Table 22 for a reconciliation of Tier I common equity.
[2] Pro-forma effect includes the repurchase of the $935 million in capital securities and the repurchase of the warrant for $3 million.
[3] As of June 30, 2014, the Corporation had recorded a trade receivable for $441 million in other assets associated with the senior note issuance which settled in July 1st, 2014. The funds were used to repay the TARP funds. The trade receivable was risk-weighted at 100%, while the remaining funds used to repay TARP had 0% risk weight.
[4] Actual and pro-forma Common Tier I capital includes $414.1 million of accelerated discount amortization related to the subsequent $935 million TARP repayment. The Tier 1 common equity ratio on a pro-forma basis was impacted by the warrant and the trade receivable. The ratio is computed by dividing Tier 1 common equity by risk-weighted assets.

New Capital Rules to Implement Basel III Capital Requirements

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Board”), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and together with the Board and the OCC (the “Agencies”) approved new rules (“New Capital Rules”) to establish a revised comprehensive regulatory capital framework for all U.S. banking organizations. On July 9, 2013, the New Capital Rules were approved by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and (as interim final rules) by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) (together with the Board, the “Agencies”).

The New Capital Rules generally implement the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s (the “Basel Committee”) December 2010 final capital framework referred to as “Basel III” for strengthening international capital standards. The New Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries, including Popular, BPPR and BPNA, as compared to the current U.S. general risk-based capital rules. The New Capital Rules revise the definitions and the components of regulatory capital, as well as address other issues affecting the numerator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios. The New Capital Rules also address asset risk weights and other matters

179


Table of Contents

affecting the denominator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios and replace the existing general risk-weighting approach, which was derived from the Basel Committee’s 1988 “Basel I” capital accords, with a more risk-sensitive approach based, in part, on the “standardized approach” in the Basel Committee’s 2004 “Basel II” capital accords. In addition, the New Capital Rules implement certain provisions of Dodd-Frank Act, including the requirements of Section 939A to remove references to credit ratings from the federal agencies’ rules. The New Capital Rules are effective for Popular, BPPR and BPNA on January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain of their components and other provisions.

Among other matters, the New Capital Rules: (i) introduce a new capital measure called “Common Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”) and related regulatory capital ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets; (ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting certain revised requirements; (iii) mandate that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital; and (iv) expand the scope of the deductions from and adjustments to capital as compared to existing regulations. Under the New Capital Rules, for most banking organizations, including the Corporation, the most common form of Additional Tier 1 capital is non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and the most common form of Tier 2 capital is subordinated notes and a portion of the allocation for loan and lease losses, in each case, subject to the New Capital Rules’ specific requirements.

Pursuant to the New Capital Rules, the minimum capital ratios as of January 1, 2015 will be as follows:

4.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;

6.0% Tier 1 capital (that is, CET1 plus Additional Tier 1 capital) to risk-weighted assets;

8.0% Total capital (that is, Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets; and

4% Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets as reported on consolidated financial statements (known as the “leverage ratio”).

The New Capital Rules also introduce a new 2.5% “capital conservation buffer”, composed entirely of CET1, on top of the three minimum risk-weighted asset ratios. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. Thus, when fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, Popular, BPPR and BPNA will be required to maintain such an additional capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of CET1, effectively resulting in minimum ratios of (i) CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7%, (ii) Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.5%, and (iii) Total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 10.5%.

The New Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such items, in the aggregate, exceed 15% of CET1.

In addition (as noted above), under the current general risk-based capital rules, the effects of AOCI items included in shareholders’ equity (for example, mark-to-market adjustments to the value of securities held in the available for sale portfolio) under U.S. GAAP are reversed for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios. Pursuant to the New Capital Rules, the effects of certain AOCI items are not excluded; however, non-advanced approach banking organizations, including Popular, BPPR and BPNA, may make a one-time permanent election to continue to exclude these items. This election must be made concurrently with the first filing of certain of the Popular’s, BPPR’s and BPNA’s periodic regulatory reports in the beginning of 2015. Popular, BPPR and BPNA expect to make this election in order to avoid significant variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the fair value of their securities portfolio. The New Capital Rules also preclude certain hybrid securities, such as trust preferred securities, from inclusion in bank holding companies’ Tier 1 capital, subject to phase-out in the case of bank holding companies that had $15 billion or more in total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009. The Corporation’s Tier I capital level at June 30, 2014, included $ 427 million of trust preferred securities that are subject to the phase-out provisions of the New Capital Rules. The Corporation would be allowed to include only 25 percent of such trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital as of January 1, 2015 and 0 percent as of January 1, 2016, and thereafter. Trust preferred securities no longer included in Popular’s Tier 1 capital may nonetheless be included as a component of Tier 2 capital on a permanent basis without phase-out and irrespective of whether such securities otherwise meet the revised definition of Tier 2 capital set forth in the New Capital Rules. The Corporation’s trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 were exempt from the phase-out provision. However, these were repurchased by the Corporation on July 2, 2014.

180


Table of Contents

Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to CET1 will begin on January 1, 2015 and will be phased-in over a 4-year period (beginning at 40% on January 1, 2015 and an additional 20% per year thereafter). The implementation of the capital conservation buffer will begin on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and increase by 0.625% on each subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019.

With respect to BPPR and BPNA, the New Capital Rules revise the “prompt corrective action” (“PCA”) regulations adopted pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, by: (i) introducing a CET1 ratio requirement at each PCA category (other than critically undercapitalized), with the required CET1 ratio being 6.5% for well-capitalized status; (ii) increasing the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio requirement for each category, with the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio for well-capitalized status being 8% (as compared to the current 6%); and (iii) eliminating the current provision that provides that a bank with a composite supervisory rating of 1 may have a 3% leverage ratio and still be adequately capitalized. The New Capital Rules do not change the total risk-based capital requirement for any PCA category.

The New Capital Rules prescribe a new standardized approach for risk weightings that expand the risk-weighting categories from the current four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset classes.

The Corporation has evaluated the impact of the New Capital Rules on our regulatory capital ratios and estimates a reduction of approximately 103 basis points to our Basel I Tier I Common risk-based capital ratio based on our June 30, 2014 balance sheet composition, assuming the TARP repayment and a full phase-in of the New Capital Rules. The following table presents a preliminary estimate of the computation of the Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios and risk-weighted assets on a fully-phased in basis under the methodologies set forth in the New Capital Rules based on our current understanding of those Rules and subject to certain assumptions.

We believe that Popular, BPPR and BPNA will be able to meet the required well-capitalized capital ratios on a Basel III basis.

181


Table of Contents

Table 24—Estimated Regulatory Capital Ratios Under Basel III Rules—Fully Phased-in-Basis

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 adjusted
to reflect the
TARP repayment

Tier I common equity (Basel I)

$ 3,221,829

Adjustment related to capital components

10,022

Estimated Tier I common equity under Basel III rules without AOCI

$ 3,231,851

Additional Tier I equity (Basel I)

$ 476,762

Adjustment related to capital components

(426,602 )

Estimated additional Tier I equity under Basel III rules

$ 50,160

Tier II capital (Basel I)

$ 298,135

Adjustment related to capital components

450,441

Estimated Tier II capital under Basel III rules

$ 748,576

Total capital (Basel I)

$ 3,996,726

Adjustment related to capital components

33,861

Estimated total capital under Basel III rules

$ 4,030,587

Risk-weighted assets under Basel I rules

$ 23,426,556

Adjustment related to RWA components

1,973,497

Estimated risk-weighted assets under Basel III rules

$ 25,400,053

Estimated ratios:

Tier I capital

12.92 %

Tier I common equity

12.72

Total capital

15.87

Leverage

9.34

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial commitments, which require future cash payments on debt and lease agreements. Also, in the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into contractual arrangements whereby it commits to future purchases of products or services from third parties. Obligations that are legally binding agreements, whereby the Corporation agrees to purchase products or services with a specific minimum quantity defined at a fixed, minimum or variable price over a specified period of time, are defined as purchase obligations.

Purchase obligations include major legal and binding contractual obligations outstanding at June 30, 2014, primarily for services, equipment and real estate construction projects. Services include software licensing and maintenance, facilities maintenance, supplies purchasing, and other goods or services used in the operation of the business. Generally, these contracts are renewable or cancelable at least annually, although in some cases the Corporation has committed to contracts that may extend for several years to secure favorable pricing concessions. Purchase obligations amounted to $245 million at June 30, 2014 of which approximately 50% matures in 2014, 21% in 2015, 14% in 2016 and 15% thereafter.

182


Table of Contents

The Corporation also enters into derivative contracts under which it is required either to receive or pay cash, depending on changes in interest rates. These contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated statement of financial condition with the fair value representing the net present value of the expected future cash receipts and payments based on market rates of interest as of the statement of condition date. The fair value of the contract changes daily as interest rates change. The Corporation may also be required to post additional collateral on margin calls on the derivatives and repurchase transactions.

Refer to Note 18 for a breakdown of long-term borrowings by maturity.

The Corporation utilizes lending-related financial instruments in the normal course of business to accommodate the financial needs of its customers. The Corporation’s exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses credit procedures and policies in making those commitments and conditional obligations as it does in extending loans to customers. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total contractual amounts are not representative of the Corporation’s actual future credit exposure or liquidity requirements for these commitments.

Table 25 presents the contractual amounts related to the Corporation’s off-balance sheet lending and other activities at June 30, 2014.

Table 25—Off-Balance Sheet Lending and Other Activities

Amount of commitment - Expiration Period

(In millions)

Remaining
2014
Years 2015 -
2016
Years 2017 -
2018
Years 2019 -
thereafter
Total

Commitments to extend credit

$ 5,592 $ 1,050 $ 198 $ 102 $ 6,942

Commercial letters of credit

5 5

Standby letters of credit

20 28 48

Commitments to originate or fund mortgage loans

20 13 33

Unfunded investment obligations

1 9 10

Total

$ 5,638 $ 1,100 $ 198 $ 102 $ 7,038

Note: Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit exclude $111.5 million from discontinued operations.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $4 million and $7 million, respectively, for probable losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit. The estimated reserve is principally based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and the application of the corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology. This reserve for unfunded loan commitments remains separate and distinct from the allowance for loan losses and is reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition.

Refer to Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on credit commitments and contingencies.

Guarantees associated with loans sold / serviced

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation serviced $2.3 billion in residential mortgage loans subject to lifetime credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and FHLMC residential mortgage loan securitization programs, compared with $2.5 billion at December 31, 2013. The Corporation’s last sale of mortgage loans subject to credit recourse was in 2009.

In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The

183


Table of Contents

Corporation suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property.

In the case of Puerto Rico, most claims are settled by repurchases of delinquent loans, the majority of which are greater than 90 days past due. The average time period to prepare an initial response to a repurchase request is from 30 to 120 days from the initial written notice depending on the type of repurchase request. Failure by the Corporation to respond to a request for repurchase on a timely basis could result in a deterioration of the seller/servicer relationship and the seller/servicer’s overall standing. In certain instances, investors could require additional collateral to ensure compliance with the servicer’s repurchase obligation or cancel the seller/servicer license and exercise their rights to transfer the servicing to an eligible seller/servicer.

Table 26 below presents the delinquency status of the residential mortgage loans serviced by the Corporation that are subject to lifetime credit recourse provisions.

Table 26—Delinquency of Residential Mortgage Loans Subject to Lifetime Credit Recourse

(In thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Total portfolio

$ 2,304,197 $ 2,524,155

Days past due:

30 days and over

$ 281,092 $ 347,046

90 days and over

$ 123,876 $ 138,018

As a percentage of total portfolio:

30 days past due or more

12.20 % 13.75 %

90 days past due or more

5.38 % 5.47 %

During the second quarter and six months ended June 30, of 2014, the Corporation repurchased approximately $21 million and $48 million, respectively, (unpaid principal balance) in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions, compared with $36 million and $66 million, respectively, during the same periods of 2013. Based on historical repurchase experience, the loan delinquency status is the main factor which causes the repurchase request. Once the loans are repurchased, they are put through the Corporation’s loss mitigation programs.

At June 30, 2014, there was ten outstanding unresolved claim related to the credit recourse portfolio with a principal balance outstanding of $1.2 million, compared with five claims with an outstanding balance of $769 thousand at December 31, 2013. The outstanding unresolved claims at June 30, 2014 pertain to FNMA and Freddie Mac and to FNMA at December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $48 million, compared with $41 million at December 31, 2013.

The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses related to loans serviced with credit recourse provisions for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Table 27—Changes in Liability of Estimated Losses from Credit Recourse Agreements

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance as of beginning of period

$ 45,809 $ 47,983 $ 41,463 $ 51,673

Provision for recourse liability

7,984 6,688 19,026 10,785

Net charge-offs / terminations

(5,901 ) (8,779 ) (12,597 ) (16,566 )

Balance as of end of period

$ 47,892 $ 45,892 $ 47,892 $ 45,892

The provision for credit recourse liability increased by $8.2 million during the six months ended June 30 2014, when compared with the same period in 2013, due to certain enhancements in the estimated losses for credit recourse at BPPR.

184


Table of Contents

The estimated losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a liability when the loans are sold or credit recourse is assumed as part of acquired servicing rights and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in the line item “adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold” in the consolidated statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the following twelve-month period. Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value ratios and loan aging, among others.

Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation serviced $16.1 billion in mortgage loans for third-parties, including the loans serviced with credit recourse, compared with $16.3 billion at December 31, 2013. The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage borrower, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantees programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At June 30, 2014, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $24 million, compared with $29 million during 2013. To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporation’s servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.

When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporation’s mortgage operations in Puerto Rico conform mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or are sold directly to FNMA for cash. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses and bear any subsequent loss related to the loans. Repurchases under representation and warranty arrangements in which the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiaries were required to repurchase the loans amounted to $2.2 million in unpaid principal balance with losses amounting to $1.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014. A substantial amount of these loans reinstate to performing status or have mortgage insurance, and thus the ultimate losses on the loans are not deemed significant.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representation and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of non-performing mortgage loans. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $16.3 million. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $3.0 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. BPPR’s obligations under this clause end one year after the closing except with respect to any claim asserted prior to such termination date. The reserve balance has been maintained to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently being evaluated.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representation and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $18.0 million. BPPR is not required to repurchase any of the assets. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $10.7 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, the Corporation released $2.0 million of this reserve based on an evaluation of claims received under this clause.

The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated with indemnifications and customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by BPPR during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

185


Table of Contents

Table 28—Changes in Liability of Estimated Losses from Indemnifications and Customary Representations and Warranties Agreements

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance as of beginning of period

$ 23,731 $ 17,603 $ 26,261 $ 7,587

Additions for new sales

3,047 13,747

Provision (reversal) for representation and warranties

(1,647 ) 415 (2,663 ) 125

Net charge-offs / terminations

(504 ) (106 ) (2,018 ) (500 )

Balance as of end of period

$ 21,580 $ 20,959 $ 21,580 $ 20,959

In addition, at June 30, 2014, the Corporation has reserves for customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. Loans were sold to investors on a servicing released basis subject to certain representations and warranties. Although the risk of loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation made certain representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if not correct, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify investors for any related losses associated with these loans. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation’s reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $5 million and $7 million, respectively. E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008 and most of the outstanding agreements with major counterparties were settled during 2010 and 2011.

MARKET RISK

The financial results and capital levels of Popular, Inc. are constantly exposed to market risk. Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements in market rates or financial asset prices, which include interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and bond and equity security prices; the failure to meet financial obligations coming due because of the inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding; and the inability to easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering prices because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions.

While the Corporation is exposed to various business risks, the risks relating to interest rate risk and liquidity are major risks that can materially impact future results of operations and financial condition due to their complexity and dynamic nature.

The Asset Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) and the Corporate Finance Group are responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s market, interest rate risk, funding activities and strategy, and for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Corporation’s Risk Management Committee. In addition, the Risk Management Group independently monitors and reports adherence with established market and liquidity policies and recommends actions to enhance and strengthen controls surrounding interest, liquidity, and market risks. The ALCO meets mostly on a weekly basis and reviews the Corporation’s current and forecasted asset and liability positions as well as desired pricing strategies and other relevant topics. Also, on a monthly basis the ALCO reviews various interest rate risk metrics, ratios and portfolio information, including but not limited to, the Corporation’s liquidity positions, projected sources and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic conditions.

Interest rate risk (“IRR”), a component of market risk, is considered by management as a predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on profitability or market value. Management utilizes various tools to assess IRR, including simulation modeling, static gap analysis, and Economic Value of Equity (“EVE”). The three methodologies complement each other and are use jointly in the evaluation of the Corporation’s IRR. Simulation modeling is prepared for a five year period, which in conjunction with the EVE analysis, provides Management a better view of long term IRR.

Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in future net interest income resulting from hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated using a simulation model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by maturity and interest yields or costs. It also incorporates assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected changes in its composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates, pricing and maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data.

Management assesses interest rate risk using various interest rate scenarios that differ in magnitude and direction, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. For example, the types of interest rate scenarios processed include most likely economic scenarios, flat or unchanged rates, yield curve twists, + 200 and + 400 basis points parallel ramps and + 200 and + 400

186


Table of Contents

basis points parallel shocks. Given the fact that some market interest rates are close to zero, management has focused on measuring the risk on net interest income in rising rate scenarios. Management also performs analyses to isolate and measure basis and prepayment risk exposures.

The asset and liability management group also evaluates the reasonableness of assumptions used and results obtained in the monthly sensitivity analyses. In addition, the model and processes used to assess IRR are subject to third-party validations according to the guidelines established in the Model Governance and Validation policy. Due to the importance of critical assumptions in measuring market risk, the risk models incorporate third-party developed data for critical assumptions such as prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, estimates on the duration of the Corporation’s deposits and interest rate scenarios.

The Corporation runs net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in which the yield curve is assumed to rise gradually by the same amount. The rising rate scenarios considered in these market risk disclosures reflect gradual parallel changes of 200 and 400 basis points during the twelve-month period ending June 30, 2015. Under a 200 basis points rising rate scenario, projected net interest income increases by $33 million, while under a 400 basis points rising rate scenario, projected net interest income increases by $54 million, when compared against the Corporation’s flat or unchanged interest rates forecast scenario. These interest rate simulations exclude the impact on loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, whose yields are based on management’s current expectation of future cash flows.

Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. They should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that management could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these forward-looking computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur in the future.

The Corporation estimates the sensitivity of economic value of equity to changes in interest rates. EVE is equal to the estimated present value of the Corporation’s assets minus the estimated present value of the liabilities. This sensitivity analysis is a useful tool to measure long-term IRR because it captures the impact of rate changes in expected cash flows from all future periods, including principal and interest.

EVE sensitivity using interest rate shock scenarios is estimated on a quarterly basis. The current EVE sensitivity is focused on rising 200 and 400 basis point parallel shocks. Management has a defined limit for the increase in EVE sensitivity resulting from the shock scenario.

The Corporation maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in net interest income or market value that are caused by interest rate volatility. The market value of these derivatives is subject to interest rate fluctuations and counterparty credit risk adjustments which could have a positive or negative effect in the Corporation’s earnings.

Trading

The Corporation engages in trading activities in the ordinary course of business at its subsidiaries, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”) and Popular Securities. Popular Securities’ trading activities consist primarily of market-making activities to meet expected customers’ needs related to its retail brokerage business and purchases and sales of U.S. Government and government sponsored securities with the objective of realizing gains from expected short-term price movements. BPPR’s trading activities consist primarily of holding U.S. Government sponsored mortgage-backed securities classified as “trading” and hedging the related market risk with “TBA” (to-be-announced) market transactions. The objective is to derive spread income from the portfolio and not to benefit from short-term market movements. In addition, BPPR uses forward contracts or TBAs to hedge its securitization pipeline. Risks related to variations in interest rates and market volatility are hedged with TBAs that have characteristics similar to that of the forecasted security and its conversion timeline.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation held trading securities with a fair value of $346 million, representing approximately 1.0% of the Corporation’s total assets, compared with $340 million and 1.0% at December 31, 2013. As shown in Table 29, the trading portfolio consists principally of mortgage-backed securities, which at June 30, 2014 were investment grade securities. As of June 30, 2014, the trading portfolio also included $10.3 million in Puerto Rico government obligations and shares of Closed-end funds that invest primarily in Puerto Rico government obligations (December 31, 2013 - $11.1 million) held by Popular Securities. Trading instruments are recognized at fair value, with changes resulting from fluctuations in market prices, interest rates or exchange rates reported in current period earnings. The Corporation recognized a net trading account gain of $1.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and a trading account loss of $4.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Table 29 provides the composition of the trading portfolio at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

187


Table of Contents

Table 29—Trading Portfolio

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Amount Weighted
Average Yield [1]
Amount Weighted
Average Yield [1]

Mortgage-backed securities

$ 317,082 4.82 % $ 312,751 4.90 %

Collateralized mortgage obligations

1,845 4.81 1,849 4.75

Puerto Rico obligations

8,197 5.14 7,586 5.15

Interest-only strips

842 12.16 915 12.01

Other (includes related trading derivatives)

17,857 2.63 16,642 3.14

Total

$ 345,823 4.73 % $ 339,743 4.84 %

[1] Not on a taxable equivalent basis.

The Corporation’s trading activities are limited by internal policies. For each of the two subsidiaries, the market risk assumed under trading activities is measured by the 5-day net value-at-risk (“VAR”), with a confidence level of 99%. The VAR measures the maximum estimated loss that may occur over a 5-day holding period, given a 99% probability. Under the Corporation’s current policies, trading exposures cannot exceed 2% of the trading portfolio market value of each subsidiary, subject to a cap.

The Corporation’s trading portfolio had a 5-day VAR of approximately $1.5 million, assuming a confidence level of 99%, for the last week in June 2014. There are numerous assumptions and estimates associated with VAR modeling, and actual results could differ from these assumptions and estimates. Backtesting is performed to compare actual results against maximum estimated losses, in order to evaluate model and assumptions accuracy.

In the opinion of management, the size and composition of the trading portfolio does not represent a significant source of market risk for the Corporation.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets, available-for-sale securities, derivatives, mortgage servicing rights and contingent consideration. Occasionally, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are collateral dependent and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value under the three-level hierarchy. The level within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for fair value measurement are observable.

Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporation’s fair value measurement disclosures required by the applicable accounting standard. At June 30, 2014, approximately $ 6.0 billion, or 97%, of the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis used market-based or market-derived valuation inputs in their valuation methodology and, therefore, were classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The majority of instruments measured at fair value were classified as Level 2, including U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions, most mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), and derivative instruments.

At June 30, 2014, the remaining 3% of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were classified as Level 3 since their valuation methodology considered significant unobservable inputs. The financial assets measured as Level 3 included mostly tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”). Additionally, the Corporation reported $77 million of financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2014, all of which were classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy.

188


Table of Contents

Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants. Financial assets that were fair valued using broker quotes amounted to $ 29 million at June 30, 2014, of which $ 14 million were Level 3 assets and $ 15 million were Level 2 assets. Level 3 assets consisted principally of tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Fair value for these securities was based on an internally-prepared matrix derived from an average of two indicative local broker quotes. The main input used in the matrix pricing was non-binding local broker quotes obtained from limited trade activity. Therefore, these securities were classified as Level 3.

During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, there were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates in the 2013 Annual Report for additional information on the accounting guidance and the Corporation’s policies or procedures related to fair value measurements.

Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

The majority of the values for trading account securities and investment securities available-for-sale are obtained from third-party pricing services and are validated with alternate pricing sources when available. Securities not priced by a secondary pricing source are documented and validated internally according to their significance to the Corporation’s financial statements. Management has established materiality thresholds according to the investment class to monitor and investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the primary pricing service provider and the secondary pricing source used as support for the valuation results. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing service providers or broker dealers.

Inputs are evaluated to ascertain that they consider current market conditions, including the relative liquidity of the market. When a market quote for a specific security is not available, the pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument, such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent trading data is not available, the pricing service provider relies on specific information including dialogue with brokers, buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established benchmarks and transactions on similar securities, to draw correlations based on the characteristics of the evaluated instrument. If for any reason the pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it discontinues pricing the instrument. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, none of the Corporation’s investment securities were subject to pricing discontinuance by the pricing service providers. The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing service providers is concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement guidance.

Furthermore, management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of investment securities at least on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses that may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any guarantees.

Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics and market liquidity. At the end of each period, management assesses the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. The fair value measurement analysis performed by the Corporation includes validation procedures and review of market changes, pricing methodology, assumption and level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s portfolio of trading and investment securities available-for-sale amounted to $ 6.0 billion and represented 97% of the Corporation’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. At June 30, 2014, net unrealized gains on the trading and available-for-sale investments securities portfolios approximated $11 million and $4 million, respectively. Fair values for most of the Corporation’s trading and investment securities available-for-sale were classified as Level 2. Trading and investment securities available-for-sale classified as Level 3, which were the securities that involved the highest degree of judgment, represented less than 1% of the Corporation’s total portfolio of trading and investment securities available-for-sale.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), which amounted to $ 152 million at June 30, 2014, do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Fair value is estimated based upon discounted net cash flows calculated from a combination of loan level data and market assumptions. The valuation model combines loans with common characteristics that impact servicing cash flows (e.g. investor, remittance cycle, interest rate, product type, etc.) in order to project net cash flows. Market valuation assumptions include prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, and contractual servicing fee income, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are derived from market data that is more relevant to the U.S. mainland loan portfolios and, thus, are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior since prepayment rates in Puerto Rico have

189


Table of Contents

been historically lower. Other assumptions are, in the most part, directly obtained from third-party providers. Disclosure of two of the key economic assumptions used to measure MSRs, which are prepayment speed and discount rate, and a sensitivity analysis to adverse changes to these assumptions, is included in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.

Derivatives

Derivatives, such as interest rate swaps and indexed options, are traded in over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or “to be announced securities” (“TBAs”). All of these derivatives held by the Corporation were classified as Level 2. Valuations of derivative assets and liabilities reflect the values associated with counterparty risk and nonperformance risk, respectively. The non-performance risk, which measures the Corporation’s own credit risk, is determined using internally-developed models that consider the net realizable value of the collateral posted, remaining term, and the creditworthiness or credit standing of the Corporation. The counterparty risk is also determined using internally-developed models which incorporate the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, net realizable value of the collateral received, and available public data or internally-developed data to determine their probability of default. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation employs procedures for credit approvals and credit limits, monitors the counterparties’ credit condition, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, requests additional collateral. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, inclusion of credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives resulted in a net gain of $0.4 million recorded in the other operating income and interest expense captions of the consolidated statement of operations, which consisted of a loss of $0.2 million from the assessment of the counterparties’ credit risk and a gain of $0.6 million resulting from the Corporation’s own credit standing adjustment. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, inclusion of credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives resulted in a net gain of $1.5 million recorded in the other operating income and interest expense captions of the consolidated statement of operations, which consisted of a gain of $1.0 million resulting from assessment of the counterparties credit risk and a gain of $0.5 million resulting from the Corporation’s own credit standing adjustment.

Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral dependent

The impairment is based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, size and supply and demand. Deterioration of the housing markets and the economy in general have adversely impacted and continue to affect the market activity related to real estate properties. These collateral dependent impaired loans are classified as Level 3 and are reported as a nonrecurring fair value measurement.

190


Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY

The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation has sufficient liquidity to meet all of its financial obligations, finance expected future growth and maintain a reasonable safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed market conditions. The Board is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s tolerance for liquidity risk, including approving relevant risk limits and policies. The Board has delegated the monitoring of these risks to the RMC and the ALCO. The management of liquidity risk, on a long-term and day-to-day basis, is the responsibility of the Corporate Treasury Division. The Corporation’s Corporate Treasurer is responsible for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Board and for monitoring the Corporation’s liquidity position on an ongoing basis. Also, the Corporate Treasury Division coordinates corporate wide liquidity management strategies and activities with the reportable segments, oversees policy breaches and manages the escalation process. The Financial and Operational Risk Management Division is responsible for the independent monitoring and reporting of adherence with established policies.

An institution’s liquidity may be pressured if, for example, its credit rating is downgraded, it experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow, or some other event causes counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook, adverse ratings of its principal markets and regulatory changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding.

Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. It is also managed at the level of the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The Corporation has adopted policies and limits to monitor more effectively the Corporation’s liquidity position and that of the banking subsidiaries. Additionally, contingency funding plans are used to model various stress events of different magnitudes and affecting different time horizons that assist management in evaluating the size of the liquidity buffers needed if those stress events occur. However, such models may not predict accurately how the market and customers might react to every event, and are dependent on many assumptions.

Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered deposits and public funds deposits, continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, funding 68% of the Corporation’s total assets at June 30, 2014, compared with 75% at December 31, 2013. The ratio of total ending loans to deposits was 90% at June 30, 2014, compared to 93% at December 31, 2013. In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. At June 30, 2014, these borrowings consisted primarily of $ 1.8 billion in assets sold under agreement to repurchase, $541 million in advances with the FHLB, $1.4 billion in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures related to trust preferred securities and $450 million in term notes issued to partially fund the repayment of TARP funds. A detailed description of the Corporation’s borrowings, including their terms, is included in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements provide information on the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows.

On April 22, 2014 the Corporation’s U.S. bank subsidiary (“PCB”) declared a $250 million cash dividend to the Bank Holding Company (“BHC”), $100 million of which was contributed by the BHC to the Puerto Rico banking subsidiary (“BPPR”).

The following sections provide further information on the Corporation’s major funding activities and needs, as well as the risks involved in these activities. A detailed description of the Corporation’s borrowings and available lines of credit, including its terms, is included in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements provide information on the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows.

Banking Subsidiaries

Primary sources of funding for the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or “the banking subsidiaries,” include retail and commercial deposits, brokered deposits, unpledged investment securities, and, to a lesser extent, loan sales. In addition, the Corporation maintains borrowing facilities with the FHLB and at the discount window of the Fed, and has a considerable amount of collateral pledged that can be used to quickly raise funds under these facilities.

The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan originations, investment portfolio purchases, loan purchases and repurchases, repayment of outstanding obligations (including deposits), and operational expenses. Also, the banking subsidiaries assume liquidity risk related to collateral posting requirements for certain activities mainly in connection with contractual commitments, recourse provisions, servicing advances, derivatives, credit card licensing agreements and support to several mutual funds administered by BPPR.

191


Table of Contents

Note 38 to the consolidated financial statements provides a consolidating statement of cash flows which includes the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries as part of the “All other subsidiaries and eliminations” column.

The banking subsidiaries maintain sufficient funding capacity to address large increases in funding requirements such as deposit outflows. This capacity is comprised mainly of available liquidity derived from secured funding sources, as well as on-balance sheet liquidity in the form of cash balances maintained at the Fed and unused secured lines held at the Fed and FHLB, in addition to liquid unpledged securities. The Corporation has established liquidity guidelines that require the banking subsidiaries to have sufficient liquidity to cover all short-term borrowings and a portion of deposits.

The Corporation’s ability to compete successfully in the marketplace for deposits, excluding brokered deposits, depends on various factors, including pricing, service, convenience and financial stability as reflected by operating results, credit ratings (by nationally recognized credit rating agencies), and importantly, FDIC deposit insurance. Although a downgrade in the credit ratings of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries may impact their ability to raise retail and commercial deposits or the rate that it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact should be material. Deposits at all of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries are federally insured (subject to FDIC limits) and this is expected to mitigate the potential effect of a downgrade in the credit ratings.

Deposits are a key source of funding as they tend to be less volatile than institutional borrowings and their cost is less sensitive to changes in market rates. Refer to Table 19 for a breakdown of deposits by major types. Core deposits are generated from a large base of consumer, corporate and institutional customers. Core deposits include all non-interest bearing deposits, savings deposits and certificates of deposit under $100,000, excluding brokered deposits with denominations under $100,000. Core deposits have historically provided the Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. Core deposits totaled $ 20.4 billion, or 82% of total deposits, at June 30, 2014, compared with $21.9 billion, or 82% of total deposits, at December 31, 2013. Core deposits financed 67% of the Corporation’s earning assets at June 30, 2014, compared with 70% at December 31, 2013.

Certificates of deposit with denominations of $100,000 and over at June 30, 2014 totaled $3.0 billion, or 12% of total deposits (December 31, 2013 - $3.2 billion, or 12% of total deposits). Their distribution by maturity at June 30, 2014 is presented in the table that follows:

Table 30—Distribution by Maturity of Certificate of Deposits of $100,000 and Over

(In thousands)

3 months or less

$ 1,557,130

3 to 6 months

437,155

6 to 12 months

421,364

Over 12 months

601,934

Total

$ 3,017,583

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, approximately 7% of the Corporation’s assets were financed by brokered deposits. The Corporation had $2.4 billion in brokered deposits at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. In the event that any of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries’ regulatory capital ratios fall below those required by a well-capitalized institution or are subject to capital restrictions by the regulators, that banking subsidiary faces the risk of not being able to raise or maintain brokered deposits and faces limitations on the rate paid on deposits, which may hinder the Corporation’s ability to effectively compete in its retail markets and could affect its deposit raising efforts.

To the extent that the banking subsidiaries are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, the Corporation may meet its liquidity needs through short-term borrowings by pledging securities for borrowings under repurchase agreements, by pledging additional loans and securities through the available secured lending facilities, or by selling liquid assets. These measures are subject to availability of collateral.

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the banking subsidiaries had credit facilities authorized with the FHLB aggregating to $3.3 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, based on assets pledged with the FHLB at those dates. Outstanding borrowings under these credit facilities totaled $541 million at June 30, 2014 and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2013. Such advances are collateralized by loans held-in-portfolio, do not have restrictive covenants and do not have any callable features. At June 30, 2014 the credit facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $ 3.4 billion in loans held-in-portfolio and $4.5 billion at December 31, 2013. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the terms of FHLB advances outstanding.

192


Table of Contents

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation’s borrowing capacity at the Fed’s Discount Window amounted to approximately $2.6 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, which remained unused as of both dates. This facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under difficult market conditions. The amount available under this borrowing facility is dependent upon the balance of performing loans, securities pledged as collateral and the haircuts assigned to such collateral. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, this credit facility with the Fed was collateralized by $4.8 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively, in loans held-in-portfolio.

On July 25, 2011, Popular, Inc. and BPPR entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico that requires the approval of these entities prior to the payment of any dividends by BPPR to PIHC. BPNA could not declare any dividends without the approval of the Federal Reserve Board.

As disclosed in Note 3, Discontinued Operations, in connection with the sale of the U.S. regional operations of California, Illinois and Central Florida, BPNA will be transferring the assets and liabilities of these regions which currently result in an aggregate net liability of $251.4 million. Upon the closing of these transactions, BPNA will need to fund this difference with its available liquid assets.

At June 30, 2014, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient current and projected liquidity sources to meet their anticipated cash flow obligations, as well as special needs and off-balance sheet commitments, in the ordinary course of business and have sufficient liquidity resources to address a stress event. Although the banking subsidiaries have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that they would be able to replace those funds in the future if the Corporation’s financial condition or general market conditions were to deteriorate. The Corporation’s financial flexibility will be severely constrained if its banking subsidiaries are unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future financing needs at acceptable interest rates. The banking subsidiaries also are required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of market changes, the Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity. Finally, if management is required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to meet its future growth, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected.

Westernbank FDIC-assisted Transaction and Impact on Liquidity

In the short-term, there may be a significant amount of the covered loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction that will experience deterioration in payment performance, or will be determined to have inadequate collateral values to repay the loans. In such instances, the Corporation will likely no longer receive payments from the borrowers, which will impact cash flows. The loss sharing agreements will not fully offset the financial effects of such a situation. However, if a loan is subsequently charged-off or written down after the Corporation exhausts its best efforts at collection, the loss sharing agreements will cover 80% of the loss associated with the covered loans, offsetting most of any deterioration in the performance of the covered loans.

The effects of the loss sharing agreements on cash flows and operating results in the long-term will be similar to the short-term effects described above. The long-term effects that we may experience will depend primarily on the ability of the borrowers whose loans are covered by the loss sharing agreements to make payments over time. As the loss sharing agreements are in effect for a period of ten years for one-to-four family loans and five years for commercial, construction and consumer loans (with periods commencing on April 30, 2010), changing economic conditions will likely impact the timing of future charge-offs and the resulting reimbursements from the FDIC. Management believes that any recapture of interest income and recognition of cash flows from the borrowers or received from the FDIC on the claims filed may be recognized unevenly over this period, as management exhausts its collection efforts under the Corporation’s normal practices.

BPPR’s liquidity may also be impacted by the loan payment performance and timing of claims made and receipt of reimbursements under the FDIC loss sharing agreements. Please refer to the Legal Proceedings section of Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements and to Part II, Item 1A- Risk factors herein for a description of an ongoing contractual dispute between BPPR and the FDIC which has impacted the timing of the payment of claims under the loss share agreements.

193


Table of Contents

Bank Holding Companies

The principal sources of funding for the holding companies include cash on hand, investment securities, dividends received from banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory limits and authorizations) asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries and proceeds from potential securities offerings.

The principal use of these funds include the repayment of debt, and interest payments to holders of senior debt and junior subordinated deferrable interest (related to trust preferred securities) and capitalizing its banking subsidiaries.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, PIHC received $ 2.3 million in dividends from EVERTEC’s parent company. PIHC also received $10.1 million in dividends from its investment in BHD.

On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury through the repurchase of $935 million of trust capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Corporation funded the repurchase through a combination of available cash and approximately $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019 which settled on July 1, 2014.

On July 23, 2014, the Corporation also completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008. The warrant represented the right to purchase 2,093,284 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $67 per share with an original term of 10 years. The Corporation and the U.S. Treasury agreed upon a repurchase price of $3.0 million for the warrant. With the completion of this transaction, the Corporation completed its exit from the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

In connection with the repayment of TARP on July 2, 2014, the Corporation accelerated the related amortization of the discount and deferred costs amounting to $414.1 million during the second quarter of 2014, which is reflected as part of interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

Another use of liquidity at the parent holding company is the payment of dividends on preferred stock. At the end of 2010, the Corporation resumed paying dividends on its Series A and B preferred stock. The preferred stock dividends amounted to $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The preferred stock dividends paid were financed by issuing new shares of common stock to the participants of the Corporation’s qualified employee savings plans. The Corporation is required to obtain approval from the Fed prior to declaring or paying dividends, incurring, increasing or guaranteeing debt or making any distributions on its trust preferred securities or subordinated debt. The Corporation anticipates that any future preferred stock dividend payments would continue to be financed with the issuance of new common stock in connection with its qualified employee savings plans. The Corporation is not paying dividends to holders of its common stock.

The BHC’s have in the past borrowed in the money markets and in the corporate debt market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries, however, the cash needs of the Corporation’s non-banking subsidiaries other than to repay indebtedness and interest are now minimal. These sources of funding have become more costly due to the reductions in the Corporation’s credit ratings. The Corporation’s principal credit ratings are below “investment grade” which affects the Corporation’s ability to raise funds in the capital markets. The Corporation has an automatic shelf registration statement filed and effective with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which permits the Corporation to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity securities.

Note 38 to the consolidated financial statements provides a statement of condition, of operations and of cash flows for the two BHC’s. The loans held-in-portfolio in such financial statements is principally associated with intercompany transactions.

The outstanding balance of notes payable at the BHC’s amounted to $1.8 billion at June 30, 2014 and to $972 million on December 31, 2013. These borrowings are principally junior subordinated debentures (related to trust preferred securities), including those issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of the TARP, and unsecured senior debt (term notes) which were repaid in full on July 2, 2014, as mentioned above. The repayment of the BHC’s obligations represents a potential cash need which is expected to be met with a combination of internal liquidity resources stemming mainly from future dividend receipts and new borrowings. Increasing or guaranteeing new debt would be subject to the approval of the Fed.

194


Table of Contents

The contractual maturities of the BHC’s notes payable at June 30, 2014 are presented in Table 31.

Table 31—Distribution of BHC’s Notes Payable by Contractual Maturity

Year

(In thousands)

2014

$ 675

2015

2016

2017

2018

Later years

889,800

No stated maturity

936,000

Total

1,826,475

The BHCs liquidity position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand, investments and other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs obligations during the foreseeable future.

Non-banking subsidiaries

The principal sources of funding for the non-banking subsidiaries include internally generated cash flows from operations, loan sales, repurchase agreements, and borrowed funds from their direct parent companies or the holding companies. The principal uses of funds for the non-banking subsidiaries include repayment of maturing debt, operational expenses and payment of dividends to the BHCs. The liquidity needs of the non-banking subsidiaries are minimal since most of them are funded internally from operating cash flows or from intercompany borrowings from their holding companies, BPPR or BPNA.

Obligations Subject to Rating Triggers or Collateral Requirements

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated by the major rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and secured borrowings. The banking subsidiaries had $19 million in deposits at June 30, 2014 that are subject to rating triggers.

Some of the Corporation’s derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the bank’s well-capitalized status and certain formal regulatory actions. These agreements could require exposure collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $12 million at June 30, 2014, with the Corporation providing collateral totaling $16 million to cover the net liability position with counterparties on these derivative instruments.

In addition, certain mortgage servicing and custodial agreements that BPPR has with third parties include rating covenants. In the event of a credit rating downgrade, the third parties have the right to require the institution to engage a substitute cash custodian for escrow deposits and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Also, as discussed in the Guarantees section of this MD&A, the Corporation services residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain contractual agreements require the Corporation to post collateral to secure such recourse obligations if the institution’s required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by the Corporation to secure recourse obligations amounted to approximately $105 million at June 30, 2014. The Corporation could be required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management expects that it would be able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The requirements to post collateral under certain agreements or the loss of escrow deposits could reduce the Corporation’s liquidity resources and impact its operating results.

195


Table of Contents

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND LOAN QUALITY

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets include primarily past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest, renegotiated loans, and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table 29.

The Corporation’s non-accruing and charge-off policies by major categories of loan portfolios are as follows:

Commercial and construction loans—recognition of interest income on commercial and construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection of principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portions of secured loans past due as to principal and interest is charged-off not later than 365 days past due. However, in the case of collateral dependent loans individually evaluated for impairment, the excess of the recorded investment over the fair value of the collateral (portion deemed uncollectible) is generally promptly charged-off, but in any event, not later than the quarter following the quarter in which such excess was first recognized. Commercial unsecured loans are charged-off no later than 180 days past due. Overdrafts are generally charged-off no later than 60 days past their due date.

Lease financing—recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears.

Mortgage loans—recognition of interest income on mortgage loans is generally discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. The impaired portion of a mortgage loan is charged-off when the loan is 180 days past due. The Corporation discontinues the recognition of interest income on residential mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) or guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) when 18 months delinquent as to principal or interest. The principal repayment on these loans is insured.

Consumer loans—recognition of interest income on closed-end consumer loans and home-equity lines of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Closed-end consumer loans are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open-end consumer loans are charged-off when they are 180 days in arrears. Overdrafts in excess of 60 days are generally charged-off no later than 60 days past their due date.

Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”)—loans classified as TDRs are typically in non-accrual status at the time of the modification. The TDR loan continues in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (generally at least six months of sustained performance after the modification (or one year for loans providing for quarterly or semi-annual payments)) and management has concluded that it is probable that the borrower would not be in payment default in the foreseeable future.

Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation, are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected.

Covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for revolving lines of credit, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans, which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation, are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. Also, loans charged-off against the non-accretable difference established in purchase accounting are not reported as charge-offs. Charge-offs will be recorded only to the extent that losses exceed the purchase accounting estimates.

Because of the application of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to the Westernbank acquired loans and the loss protection provided by the FDIC which limits the risks on the covered loans, the Corporation has determined to provide certain quality metrics in this MD&A that exclude such covered loans to facilitate the comparison between loan portfolios and across periods. Given the significant

196


Table of Contents

amount of covered loans that are past due but still accruing due to the accounting under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation believes the inclusion of these loans in certain asset quality ratios in the numerator or denominator (or both) would result in a significant distortion to these ratios. In addition, because charge-offs related to the acquired loans are recorded against the non-accretable balance, the net charge-off ratio including the acquired loans is lower for portfolios that have significant amounts of covered loans. The inclusion of these loans in the asset quality ratios could result in a lack of comparability across periods, and could negatively impact comparability with other portfolios that were not impacted by acquisition accounting. The Corporation believes that the presentation of asset quality measures, excluding covered loans and related amounts from both the numerator and denominator, provides a better perspective into underlying trends related to the quality of its loan portfolio.

Total non-performing non-covered assets were $784 million at June 30, 2014, increasing by $49 million, or 7%, compared with December 31, 2013. Non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio stand at $640 million, increasing by $42 million, or 7%, from December 31, 2013. This increase was driven by an increase of $127 million in the BPPR segment, offset in part by an improvement of $85 million in the BPNA segment. The ratio of non-performing loans to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, increased to 3.26% at June 30, 2014 from 2.77% at December 31, 2013, also impacted by the reduction in loan balances from the reclassification to the discontinued operations.

At June 30, 2014, non-performing loans secured by real estate held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $487 million in the Puerto Rico operations and $59 million in the U.S. mainland operations. These figures compare to $388 million in the Puerto Rico operations and $141 million in the U.S. mainland operations at December 31, 2013. In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table 32, at June 30, 2014, there were $104 million of non-covered performing loans, mostly commercial loans that, in management’s opinion, are currently subject to potential future classification as non-performing and are considered impaired, compared with $103 million at December 31, 2013.

197


Table of Contents

Table 32—Non-Performing Assets

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30,
2014
As a % of loans
HIP by
category [5]
December 31,
2013
As a % of loans
HIP by
category [5]

Commercial

$ 278,133 3.4 % $ 279,053 2.8 %

Construction

21,456 12.0 23,771 11.5

Legacy [1]

8,323 5.1 15,050 7.1

Leasing

2,873 0.5 3,495 0.6

Mortgage

286,320 4.3 232,681 3.5

Consumer

42,630 1.1 43,898 1.1

Total non-performing loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans [2]

639,735 3.3 % 597,948 2.8 %

Non-performing loans held-for-sale [3]

4,426 1,092

Other real estate owned (“OREO”), excluding covered OREO

139,420 135,501

Total non-performing assets, excluding covered assets

$ 783,581 $ 734,541

Covered loans and OREO [4]

171,955 197,388

Total non-performing assets

$ 955,536 $ 931,929

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more [6] [7]

$ 420,251 $ 418,028

Ratios excluding covered loans: [8]

Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-in-portfolio

3.26 % 2.77 %

Allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio

2.68 2.49

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans, excluding held-for-sale

82.26 90.05

Ratios including covered loans:

Non-performing assets to total assets

2.61 % 2.61 %

Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-in-portfolio

2.93 2.55

Allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio

2.79 2.60

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans, excluding held-for-sale

95.28 102.11

HIP = “held-in-portfolio”

[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.
[2] Total non-performing loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, excludes $9.5 million in discontinued operations as of June 30, 2014.
[3] Non-performing loans held-for-sale consist $582 thousand in mortgage loans, $3 million in commercial loans and $1 million in construction loans as of June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $603 thousand in commercial loans and $489 thousand in mortgage loans).
[4] The amount consists of $16 million in non-performing covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and $156 million in covered OREO as of June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $29 million and $168 million, respectively). It excludes covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses.
[5] Loans held-in-portfolio used in the computation exclude $2.7 billion in covered loans at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013—$3.0 billion).
[6] The carrying value of covered loans accounted for under ASC Sub-topic 310-30 that are contractually 90 days or more past due was $0.6 billion at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $0.7 billion). This amount is excluded from the above table as the covered loans’ accretable yield interest recognition is independent from the underlying contractual loan delinquency status.
[7] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $124 million of residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $115 million). Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $60 million in reverse mortgage loans which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets (December 31, 2013 - $50 million).

198


Table of Contents
[8] These asset quality ratios have been adjusted to remove the impact of covered loans and covered foreclosed property. Appropriate adjustments to the numerator and denominator have been reflected in the calculation of these ratios. Management believes the inclusion of acquired loans in certain asset quality ratios that include non-performing assets, past due loans or net charge-offs in the numerator and denominator results in distortions of these ratios and they may not be comparable to other periods presented or to other portfolios that were not impacted by purchase accounting.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, total non-performing loans inflows, excluding consumer loan, amounted to $152 million, a decrease of $35 million, or 19%, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2013. Inflows of non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $136 million, a decrease of $22 million, or 14%, compared to inflows for 2013. Inflows of non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $16 million, a decrease of $13 million, or 45%, compared to inflows for 2013. These reductions are mostly concentrated in the commercial portfolio, reflective of credit quality improvements and proactive portfolio management processes. Refer to the following table for more information on non-performing loans held-in-portfolio inflows, excluding consumer loans.

Table 33—Activity in Non-Performing Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA BPPR BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 498,196 $ 94,826 $ 410,594 $ 139,961

Plus:

New non-performing loans

136,133 14,604 319,280 37,418

Advances on existing non-performing loans

1,000 1,011

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(6,948 ) (661 ) (12,399 ) (1,856 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(22,685 ) (6,935 ) (40,072 ) (14,462 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(67,332 ) (19,325 ) (140,039 ) (48,469 )

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

(17,402 ) (47,496 )

Non-performing loans transferred to discontinued operations

(9,239 ) (9,239 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 537,364 $ 56,868 $ 537,364 $ 56,868

Table 34—Activity in Non-Performing Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013 For the six months ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA BPPR BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 804,575 $ 203,686 $ 1,156,229 $ 223,281

New non-performing loans

158,418 27,291 315,969 53,297

Advances on existing non-performing loans

1,230 1,234

Loans transferred from held-for-sale

14,942 400

Other

4,310 4,310

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(21,991 ) (1,638 ) (49,299 ) (3,943 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(41,051 ) (17,901 ) (85,591 ) (36,190 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(66,895 ) (25,267 ) (186,442 ) (50,678 )

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

(14,968 ) (2,594 ) (14,968 ) (2,594 )

Non-performing loans sold [1]

(434,607 ) (767,359 )

Other

(4,309 ) (4,309 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 383,481 $ 184,808 $ 383,481 $ 184,808

[1] Includes write-downs of loans sold during the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013.

199


Table of Contents

Refer to Table 35 for a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Table 35—Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics—Quarterly Activity

Quarters ended June 30,
2014 2014 2014 2013 2013 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Non-covered
loans
Covered
loans
Total Non-covered
loans
Covered
loans
Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 542,575 $ 97,773 $ 640,348 $ 583,501 $ 99,867 $ 683,368

Provision for loan losses—Continuing operations

50,074 11,604 61,678 228,975 25,500 254,475

Provision for loan losses—Discontinued operations

(5,067 ) (5,067 )

592,649 109,377 702,026 807,409 125,367 932,776

Charged-offs:

Commercial

21,890 5,993 27,883 42,386 1,150 43,536

Construction

42 6,427 6,469 2,191 16,024 18,215

Leases

1,754 2 1,756 1,843 1,843

Legacy [1]

1,347 1,347 3,743 3,743

Mortgage

10,997 2,262 13,259 16,127 2,255 18,382

Consumer

33,938 (677 ) 33,261 33,206 (106 ) 33,100

Discontinued operations

13,362 13,362

69,968 14,007 83,975 112,858 19,323 132,181

Recoveries:

Commercial

11,671 555 12,226 10,274 42 10,316

Construction

657 2,727 3,384 4,485 322 4,807

Leases

610 1 611 630 630

Legacy [1]

2,552 2,552 5,208 5,208

Mortgage

678 11 689 520 520

Consumer

7,599 1 7,600 8,135 49 8,184

Discontinued operations

4,461 4,461

23,767 3,295 27,062 33,713 413 34,126

Net loans charged-offs (recovered):

Commercial

10,219 5,438 15,657 32,112 1,108 33,220

Construction

(615 ) 3,700 3,085 (2,294 ) 15,702 13,408

Leases

1,144 1 1,145 1,213 1,213

Legacy [1]

(1,205 ) (1,205 ) (1,465 ) (1,465 )

Mortgage

10,319 2,251 12,570 15,607 2,255 17,862

Consumer

26,339 (678 ) 25,661 25,071 (155 ) 24,916

Discontinued operations

8,901 8,901

46,201 10,712 56,913 79,145 18,910 98,055

Net write-downs [2]

(199,502 ) (199,502 )

Net write-downs related to loans transferred to discontinued operations

(20,202 ) (20,202 )

Balance at end of period

$ 526,246 $ 98,665 $ 624,911 $ 528,762 $ 106,457 $ 635,219

Ratios:

Annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio [3]

0.94 % 1.01 % 1.47 % 1.58 %

Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs [3]

1.08 x 1.08 x 0.69 x 0.82 x

200


Table of Contents
[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.
[2] Net write-downs for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 are related to loans sold.
[3] Excluding provision for loan losses and the net write-down related to the asset sale during the quarter June 30, 2013.

Refer to Table 36 for a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Table 36—Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics—Year-to-date Activity

Six months ended June 30,
2014 2014 2014 2013 2013 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Non-covered
loans
Covered
loans
Total Non-covered
loans
Covered
loans
Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 538,463 $ 102,092 $ 640,555 $ 621,701 $ 108,906 $ 730,607

Provision for loan losses—Continuing operations

104,196 37,318 141,514 438,068 43,056 481,124

Provision for loan losses—Discontinued operations

(6,764 ) (6,764 ) (7,860 ) (7,860 )

635,895 139,410 775,305 1,051,909 151,962 1,203,871

Charged-offs:

Commercial

48,998 13,961 62,959 82,023 11,715 93,738

Construction

458 29,408 29,866 3,820 25,783 29,603

Leases

2,721 2 2,723 3,386 3,386

Legacy [1]

4,331 4,331 10,036 10,036

Mortgage

21,261 3,918 25,179 37,903 4,317 42,220

Consumer

68,210 (972 ) 67,238 66,815 4,461 71,276

Discontinued operations

4,452 4,452 20,307 20,307

150,431 46,317 196,748 224,290 46,276 270,566

Recoveries:

Commercial

21,619 875 22,494 19,920 72 19,992

Construction

2,627 4,616 7,243 5,759 636 6,395

Leases

921 1 922 1,189 1,189

Legacy [1]

9,745 9,745 9,682 9,682

Mortgage

1,556 11 1,567 2,733 11 2,744

Consumer

14,519 69 14,588 16,361 52 16,413

Discontinued operations

9,997 9,997 8,144 8,144

60,984 5,572 66,556 63,788 771 64,559

Net loans charged-off (recovered):

Commercial

27,379 13,086 40,465 62,103 11,643 73,746

Construction

(2,169 ) 24,792 22,623 (1,939 ) 25,147 23,208

Leases

1,800 1 1,801 2,197 2,197

Legacy [1]

(5,414 ) (5,414 ) 354 354

Mortgage

19,705 3,907 23,612 35,170 4,306 39,476

Consumer

53,691 (1,041 ) 52,650 50,454 4,409 54,863

Discontinued operations

(5,545 ) (5,545 ) 12,163 12,163

89,447 40,745 130,192 160,502 45,505 206,007

Net write-downs [2]

(362,645 ) (362,645 )

Net write-downs related to loans transferred to discontinued operations

(20,202 ) (20,202 )

Balance at end of period

$ 526,246 $ 98,665 $ 624,911 $ 528,762 $ 106,457 $ 635,219

Ratios:

Annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio [3]

0.87 % 1.11 % 1.51 % 1.67 %

Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs [3]

1.16 x 1.09 x 0.70 x 0.75 x

201


Table of Contents
[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.
[2] Net write-downs for June 30, 2013 are related to loans sold.
[3] Excluding provision for loan losses and the net write-downs related to the loans sales.

Refer to the “Allowance for Loan Losses” subsection in this MD&A for tables detailing the composition of the allowance for loan losses between general and specific reserves, and for qualitative information on the main factors driving the variances.

The following table presents annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio (“HIP”) for the non-covered portfolio by loan category for the quarters and six month period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Table 37—Annualized Net Charge-offs (Recoveries) to Average Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Non-covered loans)

Quarters ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2014 [2] 2013 2014 2013

Commercial [1]

0.49 % 1.63 % 0.47 % 1.49 %

Construction [1]

(1.55 ) (3.31 ) (2.61 ) (1.43 )

Leases

0.84 0.90 0.66 0.82

Legacy

(7.66 ) (1.31 ) (9.09 ) 0.14

Mortgage [1]

0.62 0.91 0.59 1.07

Consumer

2.71 2.68 2.79 2.70

Total annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio

0.94 % 1.47 % 0.87 % 1.51 %

[1] Excluding the net write-down related to the asset sales during the first and second quarters of 2013.
[2] Excluding net charge-offs from discontinued operations.

Note: Average loans held-in-portfolio excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction which were recorded at fair value on date of acquisition, and thus, considered a credit discount component.

The Corporation’s annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio ratio was 0.94% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, down from 1.47% for the same period in 2013. Net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 decreased by $32.9 million when compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The decline is mostly driven by improvements in the credit performance of the loan portfolios and de-risking strategies taken by the Corporation to improve the risk profile of its portfolios.

During the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation’s overall asset quality remained relatively stable. The BPNA segment continued to reflect strong credit quality led by the improved risk profile of its loan portfolios, further strengthened by the divesture of its regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida. Nevertheless, challenging economic and fiscal conditions in Puerto Rico continued to influence credit quality results in the BPPR segment.

The discussions in the sections that follow assess credit quality performance for the second quarter of 2014 for each of the Corporation’s non-covered loan portfolios.

Commercial loans

Non-covered non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio remained flat at $278 million during June 30, 2014, compared with $279 million at December 31, 2013. The percentage of non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio to commercial loans held-in-portfolio increased to 3.41% at June 30, 2014 from 2.78% at December 31, 2013, primarily reflecting the reduction in loan balances from the reclassification to the discontinued operations.

Commercial non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment increased by $67 million from December 31, 2013, mainly driven by a single $52 million credit relationship. Commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment decreased by $68 million from December 31, 2013, primarily reflecting the impact of loan resolutions and credit quality improvements, and $8 million attributed to the reclassification of the discontinued operations.

202


Table of Contents

Tables 38 and 39 present the changes in the non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio for the quarters and six months period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and the BPNA segments.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, inflows of commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $30 million, a decrease of $30 million, or 50%, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2013. Inflows of commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $9 million, a decrease of $8 million, or 49%, compared to inflows for 2013. These reductions are mainly driven by improvements in the underlying quality of the portfolio and proactive portfolio management processes.

Table 38 provides information on commercial non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR (excluding the Westernbank covered loan portfolio) and the BPNA segments.

Table 38—Activity in Non-Performing Commercial Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA BPPR BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 245,931 $ 60,998 $ 186,097 $ 92,956

Plus:

New non-performing loans

30,068 7,726 116,113 24,882

Advances on existing non-performing loans

951 957

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(4,103 ) (7,803 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(14,377 ) (5,470 ) (24,655 ) (9,562 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(3,967 ) (15,475 ) (16,200 ) (30,409 )

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

(16,130 ) (46,224 )

Non-performing loans transferred to discontinued operations

(8,019 ) (8,019 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 253,552 $ 24,581 $ 253,552 $ 24,581

Table 39—Activity in Non-Performing Commercial Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013 For the six months ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA BPPR BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 186,808 $ 133,979 $ 522,733 $ 142,556

Plus:

New non-performing loans

59,736 15,763 107,471 30,874

Advances on existing non-performing loans

1,226 1,226

Loans transferred from held-for-sale

790

Other

4,310 4,310

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(2,191 ) (532 ) (11,389 ) (2,090 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(32,511 ) (9,890 ) (61,361 ) (19,771 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(12,122 ) (18,827 ) (29,256 ) (31,076 )

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

(2,594 ) (2,594 )

Non-performing loans sold [1]

(329,268 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 199,720 $ 123,435 $ 199,720 $ 123,435

[1] includes write-downs of $161,297 of loans sold at BPPR during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

203


Table of Contents

Table 40—Non-Performing Commercial Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013
June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013

Non-performing commercial loans

$ 253,552 $ 186,097 $ 24,581 $ 92,956 $ 278,133 $ 279,053

Non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans HIP

4.03 % 2.88 % 1.32 % 2.60 % 3.41 % 2.78 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the quarters ended For the quarters ended For the quarters ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30,
2014
June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Commercial loan net charge-offs [1]

$ 9,309 $ 29,968 $ 910 $ 9,808 $ 10,219 $ 39,776

Commercial loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average commercial loans HIP

0.58 % 1.94 % 0.18 % 1.09 % 0.49 % 1.63 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the six months ended For the six months ended For the six months ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30,
2014
June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries) [1]

$ 24,482 $ 54,279 (2,781 ) $ 18,670 $ 21,701 $ 72,949

Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries) (annualized) to average commercial loans HIP [1]

0.76 % 1.76 % (0.20 )% 1.04 % 0.47 % 1.49 %

There are two commercial loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-accrual status with an outstanding aggregate balance of $65 million at June 30, 2014, compared with one commercial loan relationship with an outstanding aggregate balance of $15 million at December 31, 2013.

Commercial loan net charge-offs, excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, amounted to $10.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to $39.8 million for the same period in 2013. Commercial loans annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.49% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 from 1.63% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Commercial loan net charge-offs, excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, decline of $29.6 million, or 74%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 when compared with the same quarter in 2013 was primarily due to improvements in credit quality and successful actions taken by the Corporation to de-risk the portfolio.

Commercial loan net charge-offs in the BPPR segment amounted to $9.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to $30.0 million in June 30, 2013. Commercial loans annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.58% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 from 1.94% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Commercial loan net charge-offs declined by $20.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 when compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2013. For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the charge-offs associated with collateral dependent commercial loans amounted to approximately $7.9 million in the BPPR segment.

Commercial loan net charge-offs in the BPNA segment amounted to $910 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to $9.8 million in June 30, 2013. Commercial loans annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.18% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 from 1.09% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Commercial loan net charge-offs declined by $8.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 when compared with the same period in 2013. For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, there were no charge-offs associated with collateral dependent commercial loans from continuing operations at the BPNA segment.

The Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio secured by real estate (“CRE”), excluding covered loans, amounted to $4.7 billion at June 30, 2014, of which $1.8 billion was secured with owner occupied properties, compared with $6.4 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2013. CRE non-performing loans, excluding covered loans, amounted to $188 million at June 30, 2014, compared with $221 million at December 31, 2013. The CRE non-performing loans ratios for the BPPR and BPNA segments were 4.71% and 1.71%, respectively, at June 30, 2014, compared with 3.80% and 3.10%, respectively, at December 31, 2013.

204


Table of Contents

Construction loans

Non-covered non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $21 million at June 30, 2014, compared to $24 million at December 31, 2013. Stable credit trends in the construction portfolio are the result of de-risking strategies executed by the Corporation over the past several years to downsize its construction loan portfolio. The percentage of non-performing construction loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, remained stable at 11.98% at June 30, 2014 compared to 11.53% at December 31, 2013.

Construction non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment increased to $21 million at June 30, 2014, from $18 million at December 31, 2013, driven by a single borrower. There are no construction non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, decreasing by $6 million at December 31, 2013.

Tables 41 and 42 present changes in non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio for the quarters and six months period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and the BPNA segments.

Table 41—Activity in Non-Performing Construction Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA BPPR BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 22,464 $ $ 18,108 $ 5,663

Plus:

New non-performing loans

952 8,912

Less:

Non-performing loans charged-off

(42 ) (458 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(1,918 ) (5,106 ) (5,663 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 21,456 $ $ 21,456 $

Table 42—Activity in Non-Performing Construction Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013 For the six months ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA BPPR BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 45,036 $ 5,884 $ 37,390 $ 5,960

Plus:

Advances on existing non-performing loans

14,152

Less:

Non-performing loans charged-off

(2,175 ) (3,257 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(3,817 ) (50 ) (5,757 ) (126 )

Non-performing loans sold [1]

(3,484 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 39,044 $ 5,834 $ 39,044 $ 5,834

[1] Includes write-downs of $1,846 of loans sold at BPPR during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, inflows of construction non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment increased to $952 thousand, when compared to additions for the same period in 2013. There were no additions of construction non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment during the second quarter of 2014.

There were no construction loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-performing status at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

205


Table of Contents

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries), excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, amounted to recoveries of $615 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to recoveries of $2 million at June 30, 2013. Construction loans annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio stand at (1.55%) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to (3.31%) for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Construction loan net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, increased by $1.7 million when compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2013 led by an increase in the BPPR segment. For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the charge-offs associated with collateral dependent construction loans amounted to $103 thousand in the BPPR segment and none in the BPNA segment. Management identified construction loans considered impaired and charged-off specific reserves based on the value of the collateral.

Table 43 provides information on construction non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR (excluding the covered loan portfolio) and the BPNA segments.

Table 43—Non-Performing Construction Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013
June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013
June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013

Non-performing construction loans

$ 21,456 $ 18,108 $ $ 5,663 $ 21,456 $ 23,771

Non-performing construction loans to construction loans HIP

15.81 % 11.24 % % 12.61 % 11.98 % 11.53 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the quarters ended For the quarters ended For the quarters ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries) [1]

$ (615 ) $ (2,294 ) $ $ $ (615 ) $ (2,294 )

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries)

(annualized) to average construction loans HIP

(1.86 )% (3.73 )% % % (1.55 )% (3.31 )%
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the six months ended For the six months ended For the six months ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries) [1]

$ (1,993 ) $ (1,939 ) $ (176 ) $ $ (2,169 ) $ (1,939 )

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries)

(annualized) to average construction loans HIP [1]

(2.86 )% (1.65 )% (1.31 )% % (2.61 )% (1.43 )%

Legacy loans

The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

Legacy non-performing loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $8 million at June 30, 2014, compared with $15 million at December 31, 2013. The decrease of $7 million, or 45%, from December 31, 2013 was primarily driven by lower inflows to non-performing loans, loan resolutions and portfolio run-off. The percentage of non-performing legacy loans held-in-portfolio to legacy loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 5.11% at June 30, 2014 from 7.13% at December 31, 2013.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, additions to legacy loans in non-performing status amounted to $2 million, a decrease of $2 million, or 52%, when compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in the inflows of non-performing legacy loans reflects improvements in overall loan credit performance.

Tables 44 and 45 present the changes in non-performing legacy loans held in-portfolio for the quarters and six months period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

206


Table of Contents

Table 44—Activity in Non-Performing Legacy Loans Held-in-Portfolio

For the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
For the six months ended
June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

BPNA BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 11,608 $ 15,050

Plus:

New non-performing loans

2,201 3,939

Advances on existing non-performing loans

49 54

Less:

Non-performing loans charged-off

(816 ) (3,384 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(2,227 ) (4,844 )

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

(1,272 ) (1,272 )

Non-performing loans transferred to discontinued operations

(1,220 ) (1,220 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 8,323 $ 8,323

Table 45—Activity in Non-Performing Legacy Loans Held-in-Portfolio

For the quarter ended
June 30, 2013
For the six months ended
June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

BPNA BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 35,830 $ 40,741

Plus:

New non-performing loans

4,640 11,028

Advances on existing non-performing loans

4 8

Loans transferred from held-for-sale

400

Less:

Non-performing loans charged-off

(5,358 ) (10,673 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(2,373 ) (8,761 )

Other

(4,309 ) (4,309 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 28,434 $ 28,434

In the loans held-in-portfolio, there was no legacy loan relationship greater than $10 million in non-accrual status at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries) amounted to recoveries of $1.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to recoveries of $917 thousand in June 30, 2013. Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries) to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio improved to (7.66%) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 from (1.31%) for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

207


Table of Contents

Table 46 provides information on legacy non-performing loans and net charge-offs.

Table 46—Non-Performing Legacy Loans and Net Charge-offs

BPNA

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Non-performing legacy loans

$ 8,323 $ 15,050

Non-performing legacy loans to legacy loans HIP

5.11 % 7.13 %
BPNA
For the quarters ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries)

$ (1,205 ) $ (917 )

Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries) (annualized) to average legacy loans HIP

(7.66 )% (1.31 )%
BPNA
For the six months ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries)

$ (6,087 ) $ 211

Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries) (annualized) to average legacy loans HIP

(9.09 )% 0.14 %

Mortgage loans

Non-covered non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio were $286 million at June 30, 2014, compared to $233 million at December 31, 2013. The increase of $54 million from December 31, 2013 is mainly reflective of higher non-performing loans in the BPPR segment. The percentage of non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio to mortgage loans held-in-portfolio increased to 4.30% at June 30, 2014 from 3.48% at December 31, 2013.

Mortgage non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment increased by $56 million from December 31, 2013. While inflows continue relatively stable, reduced outflows are contributing to the net increase in non-performing loans balance. Mortgage non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment remained stable, decreasing by $2 million from December 31, 2013.

Tables 47 and 48 present changes in non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the quarters and six months period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Table 47—Activity in Non-Performing Mortgage Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended
June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA BPPR BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 229,801 $ 22,220 $ 206,389 $ 26,292

Plus:

New non-performing loans

105,113 4,677 194,255 8,597

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(2,845 ) (661 ) (4,596 ) (1,856 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(8,266 ) (649 ) (14,959 ) (1,516 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(61,447 ) (1,623 ) (118,733 ) (7,553 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 262,356 $ 23,964 $ 262,356 $ 23,964

208


Table of Contents

Table 48—Activity in Non-Performing Mortgage loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013 For the six months ended
June 30, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA BPPR BPNA

Beginning balance

$ 572,731 $ 27,993 $ 596,106 $ 34,024

Plus:

New non-performing loans

98,682 6,888 208,498 11,395

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(19,800 ) (1,106 ) (37,910 ) (1,853 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(6,365 ) (2,653 ) (20,973 ) (5,746 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(50,956 ) (4,017 ) (151,429 ) (10,715 )

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

(14,968 ) (14,968 )

Non-performing loans sold [1]

(434,607 ) (434,607 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 144,717 $ 27,105 $ 144,717 $ 27,105

[1] Includes write-downs of $199,502 of loans sold at BPPR during the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, inflows of mortgage non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $105 million, an increase of $6 million, or 7%, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2013. Inflows of mortgage non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $5 million, a decrease of $2 million, or 32%, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2013.

Mortgage loan net charge-offs, excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, amounted to $10.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to $15.6 million in June 30, 2013. Mortgage loan net charge-offs to average mortgage non-covered loans held-in-portfolio was 0.62% in June 30, 2014, compared to 0.91% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Mortgage loan net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, decrease of $5.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, when compared with the same period in 2013, was mainly related to the de-risking of the portfolio. Mortgage loan net charge-offs at the BPPR segment, excluding covered loans, amounted to $9.9 million, or 0.73% of average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio on an annualized basis, a decrease of $2.7 million when compared to same period in 2013. For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, charge-offs associated with mortgage loans individually evaluated for impairment amounted to $2.3 million in the BPPR segment.

Mortgage loan net charge-offs at the BPNA segment amounted to $393 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, a decrease of $2.6 million when compared to the same period in 2013. Mortgage loan net charge-offs to average mortgage non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.13% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 from 1.00% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The net charge-offs for BPNA’s non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio amounted to approximately $462 thousand, or 0.45% of average non-conventional mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared with $2.4 million, or 2.22% of average loans for the same period last year.

Table 49 provides information on non-performing mortgage loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR, excluding the covered loan portfolio, and the BPNA segments.

Table 49—Non-Performing Mortgage Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013
June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013
June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013

Non-performing mortgage loans

$ 262,356 $ 206,389 $ 23,964 $ 26,292 $ 286,320 $ 232,681

Non-performing mortgage loans to mortgage loans HIP

4.81 % 3.82 % 1.99 % 2.05 % 4.30 % 3.48 %

209


Table of Contents
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the quarters ended For the quarters ended For the quarters ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Mortgage loan net charge-offs

$ 9,926 $ 12,589 $ 393 $ 3,018 $ 10,319 $ 15,607

Mortgage loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average mortgage loans HIP

0.73 % 0.89 % 0.13 % 1.00 % 0.62 % 0.91 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the six months ended For the six months ended For the six months ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Mortgage loan net charge-offs [1]

$ 18,442 $ 29,362 1,263 $ 5,808 $ 19,705 $ 35,170

Mortgage loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average mortgage loans HIP [1]

0.68 % 1.09 % 0.20 % 1.00 % 0.59 % 1.07 %

[1] Excludes write-downs of loans sold at BPPR.

Consumer loans

Non-covered non-performing consumer loans held-in-portfolio were $43 million at June 30, 2014, compared to $44 million at December 31, 2013. Consumer non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio decreased by $1 million when compared to December 31, 2013, driven by a decrease of $2 million in the BPNA segment. The percentage of non-performing consumer loans held-in-portfolio to consumer loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 1.09% at June 30, 2014 from 1.12% at December 31, 2013.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, inflows of consumer non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $24 million, an increase of $3 million, or 15%, when compared to inflows for the same period of 2013. Inflows of consumer non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $6 million, a decrease of $2 million, or 26% compared to inflows for 2013.

The Corporation’s consumer loan net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, amounted to $26.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared to $25.8 million in June 30, 2013. Consumer loan net charge-offs to average consumer non-covered loans held-in-portfolio increased to 2.71% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 from 2.68% for June 30, 2013. Slight increase for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was reflective of an increase of $3.6 million in the BPPR segment, offset by a decline of $3.1 million in the BPNA segment.

210


Table of Contents

Table 50 provides information on consumer non-performing loans and net charge-offs by segments.

Table 50—Non-Performing Consumer Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013
June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013
June 30, 2014 December 31,
2013

Non-performing consumer loans

$ 33,570 $ 33,166 $ 9,060 $ 10,732 $ 42,630 $ 43,898

Non-performing consumer loans to consumer loans HIP

0.98 % 1.00 % 1.77 % 1.74 % 1.09 % 1.12 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the quarters ended For the quarters ended For the quarters ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Consumer loan net charge-offs

$ 23,571 $ 19,928 $ 2,768 $ 5,832 $ 26,339 $ 25,760

Consumer loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average consumer loans HIP

2.76 % 2.46 % 2.30 % 3.80 % 2.71 % 2.68 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the six months ended For the six months ended For the six months ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013

Consumer loan net charge-offs

$ 46,554 $ 39,929 $ 7,943 $ 11,985 $ 54,497 $ 51,914

Consumer loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average consumer loans HIP

2.77 % 2.47 % 2.92 % 3.86 % 2.79 % 2.70 %

Combined net charge-offs for E-LOAN’s home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages amounted to approximately $397 thousand, or 0.65% of those particular average loan portfolios, for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, compared with $3.0 million, or 4.06%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. With the downsizing of E-LOAN, this subsidiary ceased originating these types of loans in 2008. Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines of credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first or second mortgage on the borrower’s residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home. Real estate market values at the time the loan or line is granted directly affect the amount of credit extended and, in addition, changes in these values impact the severity of losses. E-LOAN’s portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding at June 30, 2014 totaled $240 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $6 million, representing 2.58% of that particular portfolio. E-LOAN’s portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding at June 30, 2013 totaled $284 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $15 million, representing 5.32% of that particular portfolio. At June 30, 2014, home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages in which E-LOAN holds both the first and second lien amounted to $47 thousand and $235 thousand, respectively, representing 0.01% and 0.05%, respectively, of the consumer loan portfolio of the BPNA segment. At June 30, 2014, 50% are paying the minimum amount due on the home equity lines of credit. At June 30, 2014, all of the closed-end second mortgages in which E-LOAN holds the first lien mortgage were in performing status.

211


Table of Contents

Troubled debt restructurings

The following tables present the loans classified as TDRs according to their accruing status at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The Corporation’s TDR loans totaled $1.0 billion at June 30, 2014, an increase of $77 million from December 31, 2013. TDRs in accruing status increased by $25 million from December 31, 2013, due to sustained borrower performance.

Table 51—TDRs Non-Covered Loans

June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Accruing Non-Accruing Total

Commercial

$ 109,205 $ 113,148 $ 222,353

Construction

376 13,391 13,767

Mortgage

566,355 100,381 666,736

Leases

875 1,778 2,653

Consumer

110,066 11,681 121,747

Total

$ 786,877 $ 240,379 $ 1,027,256

Excludes TDRs from discontinued operations.

Table 52—TDRs Non-Covered Loans

December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Accruing Non-Accruing Total

Commercial

$ 109,462 $ 80,140 $ 189,602

Construction

425 10,865 11,290

Legacy

949 949

Mortgage

535,357 82,786 618,143

Leases

270 2,623 2,893

Consumer

116,719 10,741 127,460

Total

$ 762,233 $ 188,104 $ 950,337

Table 53—TDRs Covered Loans

June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Accruing Non-Accruing Total

Commercial

$ 14 $ 2,384 $ 2,398

Construction

2,962 2,962

Mortgage

2,804 592 3,396

Consumer

106 15 121

Total

$ 2,924 $ 5,953 $ 8,877

Table 54—TDRs Covered Loans

December 31, 2013

(In thousands)

Accruing Non-Accruing Total

Commercial

$ 7,389 $ 10,017 $ 17,406

Construction

3,464 3,464

Mortgage

146 189 335

Consumer

221 22 243

Total

$ 7,756 $ 13,692 $ 21,448

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s commercial loan TDRs, excluding covered loans, for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $219 million and $3 million, respectively, of which $111 million and $3 million, respectively, were in non-performing status. This compares with $172 million and $18 million, respectively, of which $63 million and $17 million were in non-performing status at December 31, 2013. The outstanding commitments for these commercial loan TDRs amounted to $4 million in the BPPR segment and no commitments outstanding in the BPNA segment at June 30, 2014. Commercial loans that have been modified as part of loss mitigation efforts were evaluated individually for impairment, resulting in a specific reserve of $26 million for the BPPR segment and none for the BPNA segment at June 30, 2014, compared with $13 million and none, respectively, at December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s construction loan TDRs, excluding covered loans, for the BPPR segment amounted to $14 million, all of which were in non-performing status. The BPNA segment had no TDRs to report as of June 30, 2014. This compares with $6 million each, of which $5 million and $6 million, respectively, were in non-performing status at December 31, 2013. The outstanding commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing loans whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings for these construction loan TDRs amounted to $697 thousand in the BPPR segment and no commitments outstanding in the BPNA segment at June 30, 2014. These construction loan TDRs were individually evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific reserve of $883 thousand for the BPPR segment and none for the BPNA segment at June 30, 2014, compared to $177 thousand for the BPPR segment and none for the BPNA segment at December 31, 2013.

212


Table of Contents

At June 30, 2014, the BPNA segment had no legacy TDRs to report as of June 30, 2014, compared to a total of $949 thousand of loan modifications at December 31, 2013. There were no commitments outstanding for these legacy loan TDRs at June 30, 2014. The legacy loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment requiring no specific reserves at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014, the mortgage loan TDRs for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $615 million (including $269 million guaranteed by U.S. sponsored entities) and $52 million, respectively, of which $91 million and $9 million, respectively, were in non-performing status. This compares with $565 million (including $240 million guaranteed by U.S. sponsored entities) and $53 million, respectively, of which $73 million and $10 million were in non-performing status at December 31, 2013. These mortgage loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $39 million and $14 million for the BPPR and BPNA segments, respectively, at June 30, 2014, compared to $38 million and $18 million, respectively, at December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014, the consumer loan TDRs for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $119 million and $2 million, respectively, of which $11 million and $538 thousand, respectively, were in non-performing status, compared with $125 million and $2 million, respectively, of which $10 million and $587 thousand, respectively, were in non-performing status at December 31, 2013. These consumer loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $28 million and $585 thousand for the BPPR and BPNA segments, respectively, at June 30, 2014, compared with $30 million and $280 thousand, respectively, at December 31, 2013.

Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on modifications considered troubled debt restructurings, including certain qualitative and quantitative data about troubled debt restructurings performed in the past twelve months.

Other real estate

Other real estate represents real estate property acquired through foreclosure, part of the Corporation’s continuous efforts to aggressively resolve non-performing loans. Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC increased by $3.9 million from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014.

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, comprised principally of repossessed commercial real estate properties, amounted to $156 million at June 30, 2014, compared with $168 million at December 31, 2013. Generally, 80% of the write-downs taken on these properties based on appraisals or losses on the sale are covered under the loss sharing agreements.

During the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation transferred $48 million of loans to other real estate, sold $36 million of foreclosed properties and recorded write-downs and other adjustments of approximately $12 million.

Updated appraisals or third-party opinions of value (“BPOs”) are obtained to adjust the values of the other real estate assets. Commencing in 2011, the appraisal for a commercial or construction other real estate property with a book value greater than $1 million is updated annually and if lower than $1 million it is updated at least every two years. For residential other real estate property, the Corporation requests third-party BPOs or appraisals generally on an annual basis. Appraisals may be adjusted due to age, collateral inspections and property profiles or due to general marked conditions. The adjustments applied are based upon internal information like other appraisals for the type of properties and loss severity information that can provide historical trends in the real estate market, and may change from time to time based on market conditions.

For commercial and construction other real estate properties at the BPPR segment, depending on the type of property and/or the age of the appraisal, downward adjustments currently may range between 15% to 45%, including estimated cost to sell. For commercial and construction properties at the BPNA segment, the most typically applied collateral discount rate currently ranges from 10% to 40%, including cost to sell. This discount was determined based on an analysis of other real estate owned and loan sale transactions during the past year, comparing net proceeds received by the lender relative to the most recent appraised value of the properties. However, additional haircuts can be applied depending upon the age of appraisal, the region and the condition of the property or project.

Currently, in the case of the BPPR segment, appraisals of residential properties were subject to downward adjustments of up to approximately 15%, including cost to sell of 5%. In the case of the U.S. mainland residential properties, the downward adjustment approximated up to 30%, including cost to sell of 10%.

213


Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses

Non-Covered Loan Portfolio

The allowance for loan losses, which represents management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, is maintained at a sufficient level to provide for estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. In this evaluation, management considers current economic conditions and the resulting impact on Popular Inc.’s loan portfolio, the composition of the portfolio by loan type and risk characteristics, historical loss experience, results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans, regulatory requirements and loan impairment measurement, among other factors.

The Corporation must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown, such as economic developments affecting specific customers, industries or markets. Other factors that can affect management’s estimates are the years of historical data when estimating losses, changes in underwriting standards, financial accounting standards and loan impairment measurements, among others. Changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers, in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the various markets in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for loan losses. Consequently, the business financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations could also be affected.

The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with accounting guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 (loans individually assessed for impairment). Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date for loans (pools) accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses in the current period. For purposes of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and new loans originated as a result of loan commitments assumed, the Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the accounting guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A for a description of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology.

The following tables set forth information concerning the composition of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 by loan category and by whether the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant to the requirements for specific impairment or through a general valuation allowance.

Table 55—Composition of ALLL

June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial Construction Legacy [3] Leasing Mortgage Consumer Total [2]

Specific ALLL

$ 36,597 $ 883 $ $ 688 $ 53,815 $ 29,043 $ 121,026

Impaired loans [1]

$ 317,746 $ 21,094 $ 2,536 $ 2,653 $ 466,243 $ 122,106 $ 932,378

Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1]

11.52 % 4.19 % % 25.93 % 11.54 % 23.79 % 12.98 %

General ALLL

$ 165,912 $ 4,459 $ 9,343 $ 5,271 $ 84,113 $ 136,122 $ 405,220

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

$ 7,837,801 $ 157,965 $ 160,405 $ 544,215 $ 6,198,205 $ 3,804,255 $ 18,702,846

General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

2.12 % 2.82 % 5.82 % 0.97 % 1.36 % 3.58 % 2.17 %

Total ALLL

$ 202,509 $ 5,342 $ 9,343 $ 5,959 $ 137,928 $ 165,165 $ 526,246

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio [1]

$ 8,155,547 $ 179,059 $ 162,941 $ 546,868 $ 6,664,448 $ 3,926,361 $ 19,635,224

ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1]

2.48 % 2.98 % 5.73 % 1.09 % 2.07 % 4.21 % 2.68 %

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.
[2] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. At June 30, 2014, the general allowance on the covered loans amounted to $98.7 million, while specific reserve amounted to $8 thousand.
[3] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

214


Table of Contents

Table 56—Composition of ALLL

December 31, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial Construction Legacy [3] Leasing Mortgage Consumer Total [2]

Specific ALLL

$ 16,409 $ 177 $ $ 1,053 $ 55,667 $ 30,200 $ 103,506

Impaired loans [1]

$ 297,516 $ 22,486 $ 6,045 $ 2,893 $ 452,073 $ 127,703 $ 908,716

Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1]

5.52 % 0.79 % % 36.40 % 12.31 % 23.65 % 11.39 %

General ALLL

$ 158,573 $ 5,165 $ 13,704 $ 9,569 $ 101,262 $ 146,684 $ 434,957

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

$ 9,739,669 $ 183,598 $ 205,090 $ 540,868 $ 6,229,403 $ 3,804,523 $ 20,703,151

General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

1.63 % 2.81 % 6.68 % 1.77 % 1.63 % 3.86 % 2.10 %

Total ALLL

$ 174,982 $ 5,342 $ 13,704 $ 10,622 $ 156,929 $ 176,884 $ 538,463

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio [1]

$ 10,037,185 $ 206,084 $ 211,135 $ 543,761 $ 6,681,476 $ 3,932,226 $ 21,611,867

ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1]

1.74 % 2.59 % 6.49 % 1.95 % 2.35 % 4.50 % 2.49 %

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.
[2] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. At December 31, 2013, the general allowance on the covered loans amounted to $101.8 million while the specific reserve amounted to $0.3 million.
[3] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

At June 30, 2014, the allowance for loan losses, excluding covered loans, decreased by approximately $12 million when compared with December 31, 2013, mainly driven by a $52 million reserve release in BPNA prompted by continued improvements in credit quality trends and $20 million related to the transfer to LHFS of the discontinued operations, offset in part by higher reserves for the BPPR segment of $39 million. The general and specific reserves related to non-covered loans totaled $405 million and $121 million, respectively, at quarter-end, compared with $435 million and $104 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2013. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio stood at 2.68% in the second quarter of 2014, compared to 2.49% in the quarter ended December 31, 2013. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was 82.26% at June 30, 2014, compared with 90.05% at December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014, the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans at the BPPR segment totaled $466 million, or 2.94% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio, compared with $427 million, or 2.69% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2013. The increase in the allowance was mostly driven by: (1) environmental factors adjustments accounting for prevailing macroeconomic conditions in Puerto Rico and the public sector utilities exposures, (2) the effect of downgrades in the internal risk ratings of certain large corporate and public sector relationships, and (3) higher specific reserves, partially offset by a $15 million reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models. The allowance for loan losses at the BPNA segment totaled $60 million, or 1.59% of loans held-in-portfolio, compared with $112 million, or 1.95% of loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2013, reflective of continued improvements in credit quality trend, the reclassification of $20.2 million attributable to the discontinued operation, and a $3.8 million reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in portfolio was 81.26% and 90.98% for the BPPR and BPNA segments, respectively as of June 30, 2014, compared with 95.42% and 74.12% at December 31, 2013.

The allowance for loan losses for commercial loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $203 million, or 2.48% of that portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $175 million, or 1.74%, at December 31, 2013. The allowance for loan losses for the commercial loan portfolio in the BPPR segment, excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $184 million, or 2.92% of non-covered commercial loans held-in-portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $128 million, or 1.98%, at December 31, 2013. The increase in the allowance was mostly driven by the previously mentioned factors. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the commercial loan portfolio totaled $18 million, or 0.98% of commercial loans held-in-portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $47 million, or 1.31%, at December 31, 2013. The decrease in allowance for loan losses for the commercial loans held-in-portfolio is primarily reflective of the continued improvements in credit quality trends, the reclassification to LHFS of the discontinued operations, and a reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models.

215


Table of Contents

The allowance for loan losses for construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, remained unchanged at $5 million, or 2.98% of that portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $5 million, or 2.59%, at December 31, 2013. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPPR segment, excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $5 million, or 3.83% of non-covered construction loans held-in-portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $5 million, or 3.16%, at December 31, 2013. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the construction loan portfolio totaled $151 thousand, or 0.35% of construction loans held-in-portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $247 thousand, or 0.55%, at December 31, 2013. The allowance levels in the construction portfolio are the result of de-risking strategies executed by the Corporation over the past several years to downsize its construction loan portfolio.

The allowance for loan losses for the legacy loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $9 million, or 5.73% of that portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $14 million, or 6.49%, at December 31, 2013. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses is consistent with improved credit trends, lower loan balances and lower non-performing loans.

The allowance for loan losses for mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $138 million, or 2.07% of that portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $157 million, or 2.35%, at December 31, 2013. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio at the BPPR segment totaled $120 million, or 2.21% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, at June 30, 2014 compared with $130 million, or 2.41%, respectively, at December 31, 2013. The decrease in the allowance was reflective of a lower environmental factors adjustment. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio totaled $18 million, or 1.45% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $27 million, or 2.08%, at December 31, 2013. The decrease in the allowance is reflective of favorable credit trends and the run-off of the portfolio. The allowance for loan losses for BPNA’s non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio amounted to $17 million, or 4.21% of that particular loan portfolio, compared with $23 million, or 5.57%, at December 31, 2013. The Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA.

The allowance for loan losses for the consumer portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $165 million, or 4.21% of that portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared to $177 million, or 4.50%, at December 31, 2013. The allowance for loan losses of the non-covered consumer loan portfolio in the BPPR segment totaled $150 million, or 4.41% of that portfolio, at June 30, 2014, compared with $153 million, or 4.60%, at December 31, 2013. Overall consumer portfolios display stable trends, decreasing by $3 million when compared to December 31, 2013. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the consumer loan portfolio totaled $15 million, or 2.88% of consumer loans, at June 30, 2014, compared with $24 million, or 3.95%, at December 31, 2013. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses for the consumer loan portfolio was principally driven by lower loss trends, reflecting favorable credit trends.

The following table presents the Corporation’s recorded investment in loans that were considered impaired and the related valuation allowance at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table 57—Impaired Loans (Non-Covered Loans) and the Related Valuation Allowance

June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

(In millions)

Recorded
Investment
Valuation
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Valuation
Allowance

Impaired loans:

Valuation allowance

$ 754.0 $ 121.0 $ 642.6 $ 103.5

No valuation allowance required

178.4 266.1

Total impaired loans

$ 932.4 $ 121.0 $ 908.7 $ 103.5

With respect to the $178 million non-covered portfolio of impaired loans for which no allowance for loan losses was required at June 30, 2014, management followed the guidance for specific impairment of a loan. When a loan is impaired, the measurement of the impairment may be based on: (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired loan discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate; (2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or (3) the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. A loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. Impaired loans with no valuation allowance were mostly collateral dependent loans for which management charged-off specific reserves based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell.

216


Table of Contents

Average impaired loans, excluding covered loans, during the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 were $939.4 million and $1.0 billion, respectively. The Corporation recognized interest income on non-covered impaired loans of $8.8 million and $10.1 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively.

The following tables set forth the activity in the specific reserves for impaired loans for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013.

Table 58—Activity in Specific ALLL for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2014

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Leasing Total

Beginning balance

$ 30,892 $ 243 $ 53,916 $ $ 29,413 $ 672 $ 115,136

Provision for impaired loans

13,576 537 2,371 4,316 16 20,816

Less: Net charge-offs

(7,871 ) 103 (2,472 ) (4,686 ) (14,926 )

Specific allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2014

$ 36,597 $ 883 $ 53,815 $ $ 29,043 $ 688 $ 121,026

Table 59—Activity in Specific ALLL for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Leasing Total

Beginning balance

$ 21,776 $ 135 $ 75,697 $ $ 24,472 $ 1,662 $ 123,742

Provision for impaired loans

16,693 2,349 55,358 603 9,310 (263 ) 84,050

Less: Net charge-offs

(19,750 ) (1,083 ) (2,109 ) (603 ) (2,528 ) (26,073 )

Net write-downs

(75,668 ) (75,668 )

Specific allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2013

$ 18,719 $ 1,401 $ 53,278 $ $ 31,254 $ 1,399 $ 106,051

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, total net charge-offs for individually evaluated impaired loans amounted to approximately $14.9 million, of which $14.7 million pertained to the BPPR segment and $233 thousand to the BPNA segment. Most of these net charge-offs were related to the commercial loan portfolio.

The Corporation requests updated appraisal reports from pre-approved appraisers for loans that are considered impaired, and individually analyzes them following the Corporation’s reappraisal policy. This policy requires updated appraisals for loans secured by real estate (including construction loans) either annually or every two years depending on the total exposure of the borrower. As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part of the underwriting and approval process and also for credits considered impaired. Generally, the specialized appraisal review unit of the Corporation’s Credit Risk Management Division internally reviews appraisals following certain materiality benchmarks. In addition to evaluating the reasonability of the appraisal reports, these reviews monitor that appraisals are performed following the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (“USPAP”).

Appraisals may be adjusted due to age or general market conditions. The adjustments applied are based upon internal information, like other appraisals and/or loss severity information that can provide historical trends in the real estate market. Specifically, in commercial and construction impaired loans for the BPPR segment, and depending on the type of property and/or the age of the appraisal, downward adjustments currently range from 15% to 45% (including costs to sell). At June 30, 2014, the weighted average discount rate for the BPPR segment was 18%.

For commercial and construction loans at the BPNA segment, downward adjustments to the collateral value currently range from 10% to 40% depending on the age of the appraisals and the type, location and condition of the property. This discount used was determined based on an analysis of other real estate owned and loan sale transactions during the past year, comparing net proceeds received by the bank relative to the most recent appraised value of the properties. However, additional haircuts can be applied depending upon the age of appraisal, the region and the condition of the project. Factors are based on appraisal changes and/or trends in loss severities. Discount rates discussed above include costs to sell and may change from time to time based on market conditions. At June 30, 2014, the weighted average discount rate for the BPNA segment was 31%.

217


Table of Contents

For mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties, a current assessment of value is made not later than 180 days past the contractual due date. Any outstanding balance in excess of the estimated value of the collateral property, less estimated costs to sell, is charged-off. For this purpose, the Corporation requests third-party Broker Price Opinion of Value “BPOs” of the subject collateral property at least annually. In the case of the mortgage loan portfolio for the BPPR segment, BPOs of the subject collateral properties are currently subject to downward adjustment of up to approximately 26%, including cost to sell of 5%. In the case of the U.S. mortgage loan portfolio, a haircut up to 30% is taken, which includes costs to sell.

Discount rates discussed above include costs to sell and may change from time to time based on market conditions.

The table that follows presents the approximate amount and percentage of non-covered impaired loans for which the Corporation relied on appraisals dated more than one year old for purposes of impairment requirements at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table 60—Non-Covered Impaired Loans with Appraisals Dated 1 year or Older

June 30, 2014

Total Impaired Loans – Held-in-portfolio  (HIP)

(In thousands)

Loan Count Outstanding Principal
Balance
Impaired Loans with
Appraisals Over One-
Year Old [1]

Commercial

138 $ 263,091 6 %

Construction

7 19,039 40

Legacy

1 2,536

[1] Based on outstanding balance of total impaired loans.

December 31, 2013

Total Impaired Loans – Held-in-portfolio  (HIP)

(In thousands)

Loan Count Outstanding Principal
Balance
Impaired Loans with
Appraisals Over One-
Year Old [1]

Commercial

174 $ 248,154 18 %

Construction

9 20,162 27

Legacy

4 6,045

[1] Based on outstanding balance of total impaired loans.

The percentage of the Corporation’s impaired construction loans that were relied upon “as developed” and “as is” for the periods ended June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are presented in Table 61.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation accounted for $13 million and $6 million, respectively, impaired construction loans under the “as developed” value. This approach is used since the current plan is that the project will be completed and it reflects the best strategy to reduce potential losses based on the prospects of the project. The costs to complete the project and the related increase in debt are considered an integral part of the individual reserve determination.

Costs to complete are deducted from the subject “as developed” collateral value on impaired construction loans. Impairment determinations are calculated following the collateral dependent method, comparing the outstanding principal balance of the respective impaired construction loan against the expected realizable value of the subject collateral. Realizable values of subject collaterals have been defined as the “as developed” appraised value less costs to complete, costs to sell and discount factors. Costs to complete represent an estimate of the amount of money to be disbursed to complete a particular phase of a construction project. Costs to sell have been determined as a percentage of the subject collateral value, to cover related collateral disposition costs (e.g. legal and commission fees). As discussed previously, discount factors may be applied to the appraised amounts due to age or general market conditions.

218


Table of Contents

Table 61—Impaired Construction Loans Relied Upon “As is” or “As Developed”

June 30, 2014

“As is” “As developed”

(In thousands)

Loan
Count
Outstanding
Principal
Balance
As a % Of Total
Construction
Impaired Loans HIP
Loan
Count
Outstanding
Principal
Balance
As a % Of Total
Construction
Impaired Loans HIP
Average % Of
Completion

Loans held-in-portfolio

8 $ 8,168 39 % 3 $ 12,926 61 % 92 %

December 31, 2013

“As is” “As developed”

(In thousands)

Loan
Count
Outstanding
Principal
Balance
As a % Of Total
Construction
Impaired Loans HIP
Loan
Count
Outstanding
Principal
Balance
As a % Of Total
Construction
Impaired Loans HIP
Average % Of
Completion

Loans held-in-portfolio [1]

12 $ 18,835 77 % 2 $ 5,703 23 % 90 %

[1] Includes $2.1 million of construction loans from the BPNA legacy portfolio.

Allowance for loan losses – Covered loan portfolio

The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses for the covered loan portfolio acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction amounted to $99 million at June 30, 2014. This allowance covers the estimated credit loss exposure related to: (i) acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, which required an allowance for loan losses of $91 million at June 30, 2014, compared with $94 million at December 31, 2013; and (ii) acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, which required an allowance for loan losses of $8 million at June 30, 2014 and at December 31, 2013.

Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date for loans (pools) accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses in the current period. For purposes of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and new loans originated as a result of loan commitments assumed, the Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the accounting guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment. Concurrently, the Corporation records an increase in the FDIC loss share asset for the expected reimbursement from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements.

Geographic and government risk

The Corporation is exposed to geographical and government risk. The Corporation’s assets and revenue composition by geographical area and by business segment reporting are presented in Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements. A significant portion of the Corporation’s financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in Puerto Rico, which has been going through a challenging economic cycle. Puerto Rico’s fiscal and economic situation is expected to continue to be difficult.

In February 2014, the three principal rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) lowered their ratings on the General obligation bonds of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and on the bonds of several other Commonwealth instrumentalities to non-investment grade ratings. In connection with their rating actions the rating agencies have noted various factors, including high levels of public debt, the lack of a clear economic growth catalyst, fiscal budget deficits, the financial condition of the public sector employee pension plans and, more recently liquidity concerns regarding the Commonwealth and Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and concerns regarding access to market financing.

219


Table of Contents

In March 2014, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico sold $3.5 billion in General Obligation bonds yielding 8.72% rated below investment grade, which should improve liquidity at the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and alleviate the short term liquidity situation. This financing is expected to provide liquidity to the Central Government through July 2015.

On June 28, 2014, Governor Alejandro García Padilla signed into law the Puerto Rico Public Corporations Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (“the Recovery Act”) which provides a framework for certain public corporations, including the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority, to restructure their debt obligations in order to ensure that the services they provide to the public are not interrupted. As explained in the legislation not all public corporations may use the Recovery Act. There are other governmental entities not included such as debt from the Commonwealth, the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (GDB) and its subsidiaries, affiliates and other ascribed entities, the seventy eight municipalities, the PR Sales Tax and Financing Corporation, and the Employees Retirement System, among others. Several institutional investors have filed lawsuits challenging the legality of the new law.

Given that the U.S. Bankruptcy code does not apply to municipal debt in Puerto Rico the Recovery Act aims to provide a process similar to U.S. Federal Bankruptcy in which certain Puerto Rico’s public corporations may be able to restructure their debt obligations with their bondholders, creditors and other stakeholders. The primary objective is to make them self sufficient and not rely on the Commonwealth General fund or the Government Development Bank for financial support.

On July 1, 2014, Moody’s, as a consequence to the enactment of the Recovery Act, downgraded the majority of the Puerto Rico central government and public instrumentalities’ obligations expressing its concern for all of Puerto Rico’s municipal debt based on the deteriorating fiscal situation on the island and the possibility that application of the new law may further limit the Commonwealth’s ability to access the capital markets. Both S&P and Fitch later issued ratings downgrades for various Puerto Rico Municipal issuers including Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority.

The PR Electric Power Authority faces significant fiscal and financial challenges that have to be addressed in the short term in order to stabilize its operations. They include a $696 million short term credit facility from various banks, the majority of which has been extended until August 14, 2014, pursuant to a forbearance agreement, significant recurring operational and budgetary shortfalls, high rates compared to US, high leverage, limited fuel diversification, significant CAPEX needs as well as burdensome environmental regulatory requirements.

In the case of the two other principal Public corporations subject to the Recovery Act, the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority has been operating without relying on General fund or GDB’s support as a significant rate increase in July 2013 has generated additional revenues that according to the Authority are expected to be sufficient to cover their operating expenses and financial obligations during the next three years. However, it also faces some challenges including the refinancing of $200 million in Bond Anticipation Notes due in March 2015 and complying with various regulatory requirements that require capital expenditures. The Highways and Transportation Authority challenges include, recurring operational and budgetary shortfall even after finding new sources of revenue through ACTS 30 and 31 and implementation of cost savings initiatives.

The latest GDB Economic Activity index published of June 2014 reflected a 1% year over year reduction after showing a 1.1% reduction year over year in May 2014.

The lingering effects of the prolonged recession are still reflected in limited loan demand, an increase in the rate of delinquency rates on mortgage loans granted in Puerto Rico and the financial condition of commercial borrowers. If the prices of crude oil increases and / or global or local economic conditions worsen it could result in a reduction in consumer spending which could adversely impact our non-interest revenues.

At June 30, 2014, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $833 million, of which approximately $709 million is outstanding ($1.2 billion and $950 million at December 31, 2013). Of the amount outstanding, $570 million consists of loans and $139 million are securities ($789 million and $161 million at December 31, 2013). Of this amount, $272 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that are either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment ($527 million at December 31, 2013). Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $437 million represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment ($423 million at December 31, 2013). These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality. Table 62 has a summary of the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico Government.

220


Table of Contents

Table 62—Direct Exposure to the Puerto Rico Government

(In thousands)

Investment Portfolio Loans Total Outstanding Total Exposure

Central Government

$ 68,971 $ $ 68,971 $ 99,244

Government Development Bank (GDB)

6,921 6,921 6,921

Public Corporations:

Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority

448 100,000 100,448 130,819

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority

74,997 74,997 93,800

Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority

3 3 3

Other

20,750 20,750 25,500

Municipalities

62,155 374,318 436,473 476,381

Total Direct Government Exposure

$ 138,498 $ 570,065 $ 708,563 $ 832,668

In addition, at June 30, 2014, the Corporation had $360 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default ($360 million at December 31, 2013). These included $279 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (December 31, 2013 - $274 million). These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Also, the Corporation had $48 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $33 million of industrial development notes ($52 million and $34 million, respectively, at December 31, 2013).

As further detailed in Notes 7 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial portion of the Corporation’s investment securities represented exposure to the U.S. Government in the form of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well as agency mortgage-backed and U.S. Treasury securities. In addition, $937 million of residential mortgages and $131 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies at June 30, 2014. The Corporation does not have any exposure to European sovereign debt.

ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Refer to Note 2, “New Accounting Pronouncements”.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures for the current period can be found in the Market Risk section of this report, which includes changes in market risk exposures from disclosures presented in the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Report.

221


Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Corporation’s management, with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II—Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a discussion of Legal Proceedings, see Note 24, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under “Part I—Item 1A—Risk Factors” in our 2013 Annual Report. These factors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also refer to the discussion in “Part I—Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this report for additional information that may supplement or update the discussion of risk factors in our 2013 Annual Report.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A of the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Report, except for the risks described below.

The risks described in our 2013 Annual Report and in this report are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

222


Table of Contents

RISKS RELATED TO THE FDIC-ASSISTED TRANSACTION

Our ability to obtain reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements on covered assets depends on our compliance with the terms of the loss sharing agreements.

The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow to receive reimbursement on losses from the FDIC. Under the loss share agreements, BPPR must:

manage and administer the covered assets and collect and effect charge-offs and recoveries with respect to such covered assets in a manner consistent with its usual and prudent business and banking practices and, with respect to single family shared-loss loans, the procedures (including collection procedures) customarily employed by BPPR in servicing and administering mortgage loans for its own account and the servicing procedures established by FNMA or FHLMC, as in effect from time to time, and in accordance with accepted mortgage servicing practices of prudent lending institutions;

exercise its best judgment in managing, administering and collecting amounts on covered assets and effecting charge-offs with respect to the covered assets;

use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize recoveries with respect to losses on single family shared-loss assets and best efforts to maximize collections with respect to commercial shared-loss assets;

retain sufficient staff to perform the duties under the loss share agreements;

adopt and implement accounting, reporting, record-keeping and similar systems with respect to the commercial shared-loss assets;

comply with the terms of the modification guidelines approved by the FDIC or another federal agency for any single-family shared loss loan;

provide notice with respect to proposed transactions pursuant to which a third party or affiliate will manage, administer or collect any commercial shared-loss assets; and

file monthly and quarterly certificates with the FDIC specifying the amount of losses, charge-offs and recoveries.

Under the loss share agreements, BPPR is also required to maintain books and records sufficient to ensure and document compliance with the terms of the loss share agreements.

Under the terms of the loss share agreements, BPPR is also required to deliver certain certificates regarding compliance with the terms of each of the loss share agreements and the computations required there under. The required terms of the agreements are extensive and failure to comply with any of the guidelines could result in a specific asset or group of assets permanently losing their loss sharing coverage. BPPR believes that it has complied with the terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets. No assurances can be given that we will manage the covered assets in such a way as to always maintain loss share coverage on all such assets and fully recover the value of our loss share asset.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2010 through March 31, 2012, BPPR received reimbursement for loss-share claims submitted to the FDIC, including charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. When BPPR submitted its shared-loss claim in connection with the June 30, 2012 quarter, however, the FDIC refused to reimburse BPPR for a portion of the claim because of a difference related to the methodology for the computation of charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO. In accordance with the terms of the commercial loss share agreement, BPPR applied a methodology for charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans that conforms to its regulatory supervisory criteria and is calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. The FDIC has stated that it believes that BPPR should use a different methodology for those charge-offs. Notwithstanding the FDIC’s refusal to reimburse BPPR for certain shared-loss claims, BPPR has continued to calculate shared-loss claims for quarters subsequent to June 30, 2012 in accordance with its charge off policy for non-covered assets. As of June 30, 2014, BPPR had unreimbursed shared-loss claims of $369.4 million under the commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC. On July 25, 2014, BPPR received a payment of $66.3 million related to reimbursable shared-loss claims from the FDIC. After giving effect to this payment, BPPR has unreimbursed shared-loss claims amounting to $303.1 million. If the reimbursement amount for these claims were calculated in accordance with the FDIC’s preferred methodology for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans, the amount of such claims would be reduced by approximately $156.6 million.

223


Table of Contents

BPPR’s loss share agreements with the FDIC specify that disputes can be submitted to arbitration before a review board under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. On July 31, 2013, BPPR filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association requesting that the review board determine certain matters relating to the loss-share claims under the commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC, including that the review board award BPPR the amounts owed under its unpaid quarterly certificates. The statement of claim includes requests for reimbursement of certain valuation adjustments for discounts to appraised values, costs to sell troubled assets and other items. The review board is comprised of one arbitrator appointed by BPPR, one arbitrator appointed by the FDIC and a third arbitrator selected by agreement of those arbitrators. The arbitration hearing date has been set for October 2014.

To the extent we are not able to successfully resolve this matter through the arbitration process described above, a material difference could result in the timing and amount of charge-offs recorded by us and the amount of charge-offs reimbursed by the FDIC under the commercial loss share agreement. No assurance can be given that we would be able to claim reimbursement from the FDIC for such difference prior to the expiration, in the quarter ending June 30, 2015, of the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR under commercial loss share agreement, which could require us to make a material adjustment to the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In April 2004, the Corporation’s shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Corporation has to date used shares purchased in the market to make grants under the Plan. As of June 30, 2014 the maximum number of shares of common stock that may have been granted under this plan was 3,500,000.

In connection with the Corporation’s participation in the Capital Purchase Program under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the consent of the U.S. Department of the Treasury will be required for the Corporation to repurchase its common stock other than in connection with benefit plans consistent with past practice and certain other specified circumstances. The Corporation terminated its participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, after the repurchase on July 23, 2014, of the outstanding warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury.

The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Not in thousands

Period

Total Number of
Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid per
Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
Maximum Number of Shares that
May Yet be Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs

April 1 - April 30

May 1 - May 31

144,977 $ 31.02

June 1 - June 30

Total June 30, 2014

144,977 $ 31.02

224


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Exhibit Description

12.1 Computation of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (1)
31.1 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
31.2 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
101.INS XBRL Instance Document (1)
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1)
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document (1)
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1)
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1)

(1) Included herewith

225


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

POPULAR, INC.

(Registrant)

Date: August 8, 2014 By: /s/ Carlos J. Vázquez

Carlos J. Vázquez

Senior Executive Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 8, 2014 By: /s/ Jorge J. García

Jorge J. García

Senior Vice President & Corporate Comptroller

226

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Note 1 Organization, Consolidation and Basis Of PresentationNote 2 New Accounting PronouncementsNote 3 Discontinued OperationsNote 4 Restructuring PlanNote 5 Restrictions on Cash and Due From Banks and Certain SecuritiesNote 6 Pledged AssetsNote 7 Investment Securities Available-for-saleNote 8 Investment Securities Held-to-maturityNote 9 LoansNote 10 Allowance For Loan LossesNote 11 Fdic Loss Share Asset and True-up Payment ObligationNote 12 Mortgage Banking ActivitiesNote 13 Transfers Of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing AssetsNote 14 Other Real Estate OwnedNote 15 Other AssetsNote 16 Goodwill and Other Intangible AssetsNote 17 DepositsNote 18 BorrowingsNote 19 Offsetting Of Financial Assets and LiabilitiesNote 20 Trust Preferred SecuritiesNote 21 Stockholders EquityNote 22 Other Comprehensive LossNote 23 GuaranteesNote 24 Commitments and ContingenciesNote 25 Non-consolidated Variable Interest EntitiesNote 26 Related Party Transactions with Affiliated Company / Joint VentureNote 27 Fair Value MeasurementNote 28 Fair Value Of Financial InstrumentsNote 29 Net (loss) Income Per Common ShareNote 30 Other Service FeesNote 31 Fdic Loss Share (expense) IncomeNote 32 Pension and Postretirement BenefitsNote 33 Stock-based CompensationNote 34 Income TaxesNote 35 Supplemental Disclosure on The Consolidated Statements Of Cash FlowsNote 36 Segment ReportingNote 37 Subsequent EventsNote 38 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information Of Guarantor and Issuers Of Registered Guaranteed SecuritiesItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 4. Controls and ProceduresPart II Other InformationItem 1. Legal ProceedingsItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsItem 6. Exhibits