BPOP 10-Q Quarterly Report March 31, 2016 | Alphaminr

BPOP 10-Q Quarter ended March 31, 2016

POPULAR INC
10-Qs and 10-Ks
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009
PROXIES
DEF 14A
Filed on March 25, 2025
DEF 14A
Filed on March 27, 2024
DEF 14A
Filed on March 29, 2023
DEF 14A
Filed on March 30, 2022
DEF 14A
Filed on March 25, 2021
DEF 14A
Filed on March 31, 2020
DEF 14A
Filed on March 20, 2019
DEF 14A
Filed on March 21, 2018
DEF 14A
Filed on March 9, 2017
DEF 14A
Filed on March 9, 2016
DEF 14A
Filed on March 12, 2015
DEF 14A
Filed on March 20, 2014
DEF 14A
Filed on March 15, 2013
DEF 14A
Filed on March 12, 2012
DEF 14A
Filed on March 11, 2011
DEF 14A
Filed on March 15, 2010
10-Q 1 d124633d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016

Commission File Number: 001-34084

POPULAR, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Puerto Rico 66-0667416

(State or other jurisdiction of

Incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer

Identification Number)

Popular Center Building

209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue

Hato Rey, Puerto Rico

00918
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(787) 765-9800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NOT APPLICABLE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 103,704,084 shares outstanding as of May 4, 2016.


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

INDEX

Page

Part I – Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at March  31, 2016 and December 31, 2015

5

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015

6

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015

7

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015

8

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015

9

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

10

Item  2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

121

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

170

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

170

Part II – Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

171

Item 1A. Risk Factors

171

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

172

Item 6. Exhibits

173

Signatures

174

2


Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Information

The information included in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may relate to Popular, Inc.’s (the “Corporation”, “Popular”, “we”, “us”, “our”) financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, delinquency trends, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting standards on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “continues”, “expect”, “estimate”, “intend”, “project” and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “would”, “should”, “could”, “might”, “can”, “may” or similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict.

Various factors, some of which are beyond Popular’s control, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:

the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and economic conditions in the geographic areas we serve;

changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes;

the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies;

changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels of capital and the impact of proposed capital standards on our capital ratios;

the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“The Dodd-Frank Act”) on our businesses, business practices and cost of operations;

regulatory approvals that may be necessary to undertake certain actions or consummate strategic transactions such as acquisitions and dispositions;

the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are located;

the impact of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s fiscal crisis, and the measures taken and to be taken by the Puerto Rico Government, on the economy and our business, and the ability of the Government to manage this crisis in an orderly manner;

the performance of the stock and bond markets;

competition in the financial services industry;

additional Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assessments;

possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes; and

risks related to the Doral Transaction, including (a) our ability to maintain customer relationships and (b) risks associated with the limited amount of diligence able to be conducted by a buyer in an FDIC transaction.

Other possible events or factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements include the following:

negative economic conditions that adversely affect housing prices, the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provision expense;

risks associated with maintaining customer relationships from our acquisition of certain assets and deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the FDIC as receiver;

changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect our ability to originate and distribute financial products in the primary and secondary markets;

3


Table of Contents
changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value of financial assets and liabilities;

liabilities resulting from litigation and regulatory investigations;

changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations;

our ability to grow our core businesses;

decisions to downsize, sell or close units or otherwise change our business mix; and

management’s ability to identify and manage these and other risks.

Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in “Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings,” is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of regulators, judges, juries and arbitrators. Investors should refer to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as well as “Part II, Item 1A” of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.

All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q are based upon information available to Popular as of the date of this Form 10-Q, and other than as required by law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

4


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(UNAUDITED)

March 31, December 31,

(In thousands, except share information)

2016 2015

Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 409,623 $ 363,674

Money market investments:

Securities purchased under agreements to resell

97,830 96,338

Time deposits with other banks

1,819,630 2,083,754

Total money market investments

1,917,460 2,180,092

Trading account securities, at fair value:

Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge

20,085 19,506

Other trading securities

51,199 52,153

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value:

Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge

734,168 739,045

Other investment securities available-for-sale

5,915,662 5,323,947

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value 2016—$80,914; 2015—$82,889)

99,216 100,903

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable value 2016—$167,111; 2015—$175,291)

164,024 172,248

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

125,315 137,000

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

22,618,488 22,453,813

Loans covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

625,130 646,115

Less–Unearned income

110,751 107,698

Allowance for loan losses

538,472 537,111

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

22,594,395 22,455,119

FDIC loss-share asset

219,448 310,221

Premises and equipment, net

527,493 502,611

Other real estate not covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

165,960 155,231

Other real estate covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

36,397 36,685

Accrued income receivable

120,308 124,234

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

205,051 211,405

Other assets

2,156,030 2,193,162

Goodwill

631,095 626,388

Other intangible assets

54,080 58,109

Total assets

$ 36,147,009 $ 35,761,733

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing

$ 6,384,093 $ 6,401,515

Interest bearing

21,142,500 20,808,208

Total deposits

27,526,593 27,209,723

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

760,154 762,145

Other short-term borrowings

6,370 1,200

Notes payable

1,583,468 1,662,508

Other liabilities

1,018,309 1,019,018

Liabilities from discontinued operations (Refer to Note 4)

1,815 1,815

Total liabilities

30,896,709 30,656,409

Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 23)

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391shares issued and outstanding

50,160 50,160

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 170,000,000 shares authorized;

103,895,642 shares issued (2015—103,816,185) and 103,670,005 shares outstanding (2015—103,618,976)

1,039 1,038

Surplus

4,231,233 4,229,156

Retained earnings

1,156,476 1,087,957

Treasury stock—at cost, 225,637 shares (2015—197,209)

(6,858 ) (6,101 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

(181,750 ) (256,886 )

Total stockholders’ equity

5,250,300 5,105,324

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 36,147,009 $ 35,761,733

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands, except per share information)

2016 2015

Interest income:

Loans

$ 363,197 $ 355,631

Money market investments

2,863 1,446

Investment securities

36,271 30,301

Trading account securities

1,689 2,696

Total interest income

404,020 390,074

Interest expense:

Deposits

29,874 25,864

Short-term borrowings

1,861 1,734

Long-term debt

19,873 19,281

Total interest expense

51,608 46,879

Net interest income

352,412 343,195

Provision for loan losses—non-covered loans

47,940 29,711

Provision (reversal) for loan losses—covered loans

(3,105 ) 10,324

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

307,577 303,160

Service charges on deposit accounts

39,862 39,017

Other service fees (Refer to Note 29)

53,382 53,626

Mortgage banking activities (Refer to Note 12)

10,551 12,852

Trading account (loss) profit

(162 ) 414

Net loss on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

(304 ) (79 )

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

(4,098 ) (4,526 )

FDIC loss share (expense) income (Refer to Note 30)

(3,146 ) 4,139

Other operating income

15,545 9,792

Total non-interest income

111,630 115,235

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

127,091 116,458

Net occupancy expenses

20,430 21,709

Equipment expenses

14,548 13,411

Other taxes

10,195 8,574

Professional fees

75,459 75,528

Communications

6,320 6,176

Business promotion

11,110 10,813

FDIC deposit insurance

7,370 6,398

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

9,141 23,069

Other operating expenses

17,165 17,349

Amortization of intangibles

3,114 2,104

Restructuring costs

10,753

Total operating expenses

301,943 312,342

Income from continuing operations before income tax

117,264 106,053

Income tax expense

32,265 32,568

Income from continuing operations

84,999 73,485

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

1,341

Net Income

$ 84,999 $ 74,826

Net Income Applicable to Common Stock

$ 84,068 $ 73,896

Net Income per Common Share – Basic

Net income from continuing operations

0.81 0.71

Net income from discontinued operations

0.01

Net Income per Common Share – Basic

$ 0.81 $ 0.72

Net Income per Common Share – Diluted

Net income from continuing operations

0.81 0.71

Net income from discontinued operations

0.01

Net Income per Common Share – Diluted

$ 0.81 $ 0.72

Dividends Declared per Common Share

$ 0.15 $

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Net income

$ 84,999 $ 74,826

Other comprehensive income before tax:

Foreign currency translation adjustment

(705 ) (581 )

Amortization of net losses on pension and postretirement benefit plans

5,486 5,025

Amortization of prior service cost of pension and postretirement benefit plans

(950 ) (950 )

Unrealized holding gains on investments arising during the period

76,236 35,342

Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges

(2,000 ) (2,535 )

Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income

1,545 1,358

Other comprehensive income before tax

79,612 37,659

Income tax expense

(4,476 ) (2,187 )

Total other comprehensive income, net of tax

75,136 35,472

Comprehensive income, net of tax

$ 160,135 $ 110,298

Tax effect allocated to each component of other comprehensive income: Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Amortization of net losses on pension and postretirement benefit plans

$ (2,140 ) $ (1,960 )

Amortization of prior service cost of pension and postretirement benefit plans

370 371

Unrealized holding gains on investments arising during the period

(2,885 ) (1,057 )

Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges

781 989

Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income

(602 ) (530 )

Income tax expense

$ (4,476 ) $ (2,187 )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

Accumulated
other
Common Preferred Retained Treasury comprehensive

(In thousands)

stock stock Surplus earnings stock loss Total

Balance at December 31, 2014

$ 1,036 $ 50,160 $ 4,196,458 $ 253,717 $ (4,117 ) $ (229,872 ) $ 4,267,382

Net income

74,826 74,826

Issuance of stock

1 1,405 1,406

Tax windfall benefit on vesting of restricted stock

69 69

Dividends declared:

Preferred stock

(930 ) (930 )

Common stock purchases

(1,123 ) (1,123 )

Common stock reissuance

18 18

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

35,472 35,472

Balance at March 31, 2015

$ 1,037 $ 50,160 $ 4,197,932 $ 327,613 $ (5,222 ) $ (194,400 ) $ 4,377,120

Balance at December 31, 2015

$ 1,038 $ 50,160 $ 4,229,156 $ 1,087,957 $ (6,101 ) $ (256,886 ) $ 5,105,324

Net income

84,999 84,999

Issuance of stock

1 2,108 2,109

Tax shortfall expense on vesting of restricted stock

(31 ) (31 )

Dividends declared:

Common stock

(15,549 ) (15,549 )

Preferred stock

(931 ) (931 )

Common stock purchases

(764 ) (764 )

Common stock reissuance

7 7

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

75,136 75,136

Balance at March 31, 2016

$ 1,039 $ 50,160 $ 4,231,233 $ 1,156,476 $ (6,858 ) $ (181,750 ) $ 5,250,300

March 31, March 31,

Disclosure of changes in number of shares:

2016 2015

Preferred Stock:

Balance at beginning and end of period

2,006,391 2,006,391

Common Stock – Issued:

Balance at beginning of period

103,816,185 103,614,553

Issuance of stock

79,457 42,621

Balance at end of the period

103,895,642 103,657,174

Treasury stock

(225,637 ) (170,247 )

Common Stock – Outstanding

103,670,005 103,486,927

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

8


Table of Contents

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

Quarter ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income

$ 84,999 $ 74,826

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

Provision for loan losses

44,835 40,035

Amortization of intangibles

3,114 2,104

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

11,707 11,919

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

(11,158 ) (19,100 )

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

8,477 4,929

FDIC loss share expense (income)

3,146 (4,139 )

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

4,098 4,526

Earnings from investments under the equity method

(7,089 ) (2,301 )

Deferred income tax expense

23,218 23,380

(Gain) loss on:

Disposition of premises and equipment and other productive assets

(1,946 ) (978 )

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale and mortgage banking activities

(7,101 ) (7,222 )

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

2,802 14,851

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

(66,451 ) (121,929 )

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

22,253 27,547

Net originations on loans held-for-sale

(110,528 ) (179,604 )

Net decrease (increase) in:

Trading securities

176,598 177,942

Accrued income receivable

3,926 (13 )

Other assets

20,996 (28,027 )

Net (decrease) increase in:

Interest payable

(12,261 ) (10,216 )

Pension and other postretirement benefits obligation

1,536 1,019

Other liabilities

(17,010 ) (19,377 )

Total adjustments

93,162 (84,654 )

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

178,161 (9,828 )

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net decrease (increase) in money market investments

262,632 (484,829 )

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

(742,859 ) (411,189 )

Held-to-maturity

(250 )

Other

(59,786 ) (2,520 )

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

239,399 385,672

Held-to-maturity

2,108 2,231

Other

41,664 30,785

Proceeds from sale of investment securities:

Other

26,346 1,388

Net repayments on loans

13,335 154,794

Proceeds from sale of loans

1,128 19,127

Acquisition of loan portfolios

(212,798 ) (49,510 )

Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements

88,588 132,265

Net cash received and acquired from business combination

711,051

Return of capital from equity method investments

206

Mortgage servicing rights purchased

(2,400 )

Acquisition of premises and equipment

(38,819 ) (10,231 )

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment and other productive assets

5,092 3,093

Foreclosed assets

14,513 40,161

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

(359,251 ) 519,638

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

318,550 265,906

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

(1,991 ) (139,013 )

Other short-term borrowings

5,170 (148,215 )

Payments of notes payable

(108,452 ) (419,487 )

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

28,883 46,000

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

2,109 1,405

Dividends paid

(16,473 ) (620 )

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

(757 ) (1,105 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

227,039 (395,129 )

Net increase in cash and due from banks

45,949 114,681

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

363,674 381,095

Cash and due from banks at the end of the period

$ 409,623 $ 495,776

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016 there have not been any cash flows associated with discontinued operations. The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 includes the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

9


Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidate d Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 - Nature of operations

11

Note 2 - Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies

12

Note 3 - New accounting pronouncements

13

Note 4 - Discontinued operations and restructuring plan

16

Note 5 - Business combination

17

Note 6 - Restrictions on cash and due from banks and certain securities

19

Note 7 - Investment securities available-for-sale

20

Note 8 - Investment securities held-to-maturity

24

Note 9 - Loans

26

Note 10 - Allowance for loan losses

36

Note 11 - FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation

53

Note 12 - Mortgage banking activities

55

Note 13 - Transfers of financial assets and mortgage servicing assets

56

Note 14 - Other real estate owned

59

Note 15 - Other assets

60

Note 16 - Goodwill and other intangible assets

61

Note 17 - Deposits

63

Note 18 - Borrowings

64

Note 19 - Offsetting of financial assets and liabilities

66

Note 20 - Stockholders’ equity

68

Note 21 - Other comprehensive loss

69

Note 22 - Guarantees

71

Note 23 - Commitments and contingencies

73

Note 24 - Non-consolidated variable interest entities

80

Note 25 - Related party transactions

84

Note 26 - Fair value measurement

87

Note 27 - Fair value of financial instruments

93

Note 28 - Net income per common share

99

Note 29 - Other service fees

100

Note 30 - FDIC loss share (expense) income

101

Note 31 - Pension and postretirement benefits

102

Note 32 - Stock-based compensation

103

Note 33 - Income taxes

106

Note 34 - Supplemental disclosure on the consolidated statements of cash flows

109

Note 35 - Segment reporting

110

Note 36 - Condensed consolidating financial information of guarantor and issuers of registered guaranteed securities

114

10


Table of Contents

Note 1 – Nature of Operations

Popular, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States and the Caribbean. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail, mortgage, and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as investment banking, broker-dealer, auto and equipment leasing and financing, and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the U.S. mainland, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA focuses efforts and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA operates branches in New York, New Jersey and South Florida under the name of Popular Community Bank. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. Refer to Note 4 for discussion of the sales of the California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations during 2014. Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporation’s business segments.

On February 27, 2015, BPPR, in an alliance with other bidders, including BPNA, acquired certain assets and all deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of former Doral Bank (“Doral”) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as receiver (the “Doral Bank Transaction”). Under the FDIC’s bidding format, BPPR was the lead bidder and party to the purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC covering all assets and deposits acquired by it and its alliance co-bidders. BPPR entered into back to back purchase and assumption agreements with the alliance co-bidders for the transfer of certain assets and deposits. The other co-bidders that formed part of the alliance led by BPPR were First Bank Puerto Rico, Centennial Bank, and a vehicle formed by J.C. Flowers III L.P. BPPR entered into transition service agreements with each of the alliance co-bidders. Refer to Note 5 for further details on the Doral Bank Transaction.

11


Table of Contents

Note 2 – Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. The consolidated statement of financial condition data at December 31, 2015 was derived from audited financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements are, in the opinion of management, a fair statement of the results for the periods reported and include all necessary adjustments, all of a normal recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2015 consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial statements to conform with the 2016 presentation.

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted from the unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2015, included in the Corporation’s 2015 Form 10-K. Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

12


Table of Contents

Note 3 – New accounting pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Updates

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”)

The FASB issued ASU 2015-03 in April 2015, which simplified the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability.

The amendments of this Update, which are required to be applied on a retrospective basis, are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015.

Since the Corporation‘s policy was to record debt issuance costs as a deferred asset, it reclassified $7.3 million (December 31, 2015—$7.8 million) of debt issuance costs as a result of the adoption of this accounting pronouncement during the first quarter of 2016 and adjusted prior periods accordingly.

Additionally, adoption of the following standards effective during the first quarter of 2016 did not have a significant impact on the presentation and disclosures in its consolidated financial statements:

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”)

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-13, Consolidation (Topic 810): Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financial Entity (“ASU 2014-13”)

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share is more Akin to Debt or to Equity (“ASU 2014-16”)

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-01, Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (“ASU 2015-01”)

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendment to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”)

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-04, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets (“ASU 2015-04”)

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-05, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement (“ASU 2015-05”)

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement – (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) (“ASU 2015-07”)

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-09, Insurance—(Topic 944): Disclosures about Short-Duration Contracts

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Updates

FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing

The FASB issued ASU 2016-10 in April 2016 which clarifies two aspects of Topic 606, in particular, the identification of performance obligations. Among other things, an entity is not required to assess whether promised goods or services are performance obligations if they are immaterial in the context of the contract with the customer. In addition, in determining whether promises to transfer goods or services are separately identifiable, an entity should determine whether the nature of its promise in the contract is to transfer each of the goods or services or whether the promise is to transfer a combined item (or items) to which the promised goods and/or services are inputs.

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017 (same effective date as ASU 2015-14).

13


Table of Contents

FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

The FASB issued ASU 2016-09 in March 2016 which simplifies multiple aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies as an income tax benefit or expense in the income statement and classification in the statement of cash flows as an operating activity, allowing entities to elect as an accounting policy to account for forfeitures when they occur, permitting entities to withhold up to the maximum individual statutory rate without classifying the awards as a liability, and requiring that the cash paid to satisfy the statutory income tax withholding obligation be classified as a financing activity.

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or presentation and disclosures.

FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)

The FASB issued ASU 2016-08 in March 2016, which amends the implementation guidance in ASU 2014-09 by clarifying, among other things, that an entity should determine the nature of the goods or services provided to the customer and whether it controls each specified good or service before it is transferred to the customer, that an entity can be a principal for some goods or services and an agent for others with the same contract, and that an entity is a principal if it controls the goods or services before transferring them to the customer.

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017 (same effective date as ASU 2015-14).

The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-07, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting

The FASB issued ASU 2016-07 in March 2016, which eliminates the requirement to retroactively adopt the equity method of accounting. Therefore, as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting, an entity should add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of its previously held interest. For available-for-sale securities, an entity should recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gains/losses in accumulated other comprehensive income/loss as of that date.

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments

The FASB issued ASU 2016-06 in March 2016, which clarifies that in assessing whether an embedded contingent put or call option is not clearly and closely related to the debt instrument, which is part of the assessment made to determine whether an embedded derivative must be bifurcated from the host contract, an entity is required to perform only the four step decision sequence. The four-step decision sequence requires an entity to consider whether (1) the payoff is adjusted based on changes in an index, (2) the payoff is indexed to an underlying other than interest rates or credit risk, (3) the debt involves a substantial premium or discount and (4) the put or call option is contingently exercisable. It does not have to separately assess whether the event that triggers its ability to exercise the contingent option itself is indexed only to interest rates and credit risk.

14


Table of Contents

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships

The FASB issued ASU 2016-05 in March 2016, which clarifies that a novation, or a change in the counterparty to the derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument under Topic 815 does not, in and of itself, require de-designation of that hedging relationship, and therefore discontinuance of the application of hedge accounting, provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

For recently issued Accounting Standards Updates not yet effective, refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2015 Form 10-K.

15


Table of Contents

Note 4 – Discontinued operations and restructuring plan

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of its California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations and relocated certain back office operations to Puerto Rico and New York.

As defined in ASC 805-10-55, the regional operations sold constituted a business, and for financial reporting purposes, the results of the discontinued operations are presented as “Assets / Liabilities from discontinued operations” in the consolidated statement of condition and “(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax” in the consolidated statement of operations.

As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were no assets held within the discontinued operations and liabilities within discontinued operations amounted to approximately $1.8 million, mainly comprised of the indemnity reserve related to the California regional sale.

There were no activities from the discontinued operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. Net income from the discontinued operations amounted to $1.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

Also, in connection with the sale, the Corporation has undertaken a restructuring plan (the “PCB Restructuring Plan”) which has been completed as of March 31, 2016. The Corporation incurred restructuring charges of $45.1 million. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation incurred $10.8 million in restructuring costs, mostly comprised of $9.4 million in personnel costs.

The following table presents the activity in the reserve for the restructuring costs associated with the PCB Restructuring Plan:

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Beginning balance

$ 620 $ 13,536

Charges expensed during the period

6,297

Payments made during the period

(263 ) (9,030 )

Ending balance

$ 357 $ 10,803

16


Table of Contents

Note 5 Business combination

On February 27, 2015, BPPR, in an alliance with co-bidders, including BPNA, acquired certain assets and all deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of former Doral Bank from the FDIC, as receiver. Under the FDIC’s bidding format, BPPR was the lead bidder and party to the purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC covering all assets and deposits acquired by it and its alliance co-bidders. BPPR entered into back to back purchase and assumption agreements with the alliance co-bidders for the transfer of certain assets and deposits. BPPR entered into transition service agreements with each of the alliance co-bidders. There is no loss-sharing arrangement with the FDIC on the acquired assets.

The following table presents the fair values of major classes of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Corporation as of February 27, 2015.

(In thousands)

Book value prior to
purchase accounting
adjustments
Fair value
adjustments
Additional
consideration [1]
As recorded by
Popular, Inc.

Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 339,633 $ $ $ 339,633

Investment in available-for-sale securities

172,706 172,706

Investments in FHLB stock

30,785 30,785

Loans

1,679,792 (165,925 ) 1,513,867

Accrued income receivable

7,808 7,808

Receivable from the FDIC

480,137 480,137

Core deposit intangible

23,572 (10,762 ) 12,810

Other assets

67,676 7,569 75,245

Total assets

$ 2,321,972 $ (169,118 ) $ 480,137 $ 2,632,991

Liabilities:

Deposits

$ 2,193,404 $ 9,987 $ $ 2,203,391

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank

542,000 5,187 547,187

Other liabilities

50,728 (511 ) 50,217

Total liabilities

$ 2,786,132 $ 14,663 $ $ 2,800,795

Excess of liabilities assumed over assets acquired

$ 464,160

Aggregate fair value adjustments

$ (183,781 )

Additional consideration

$ 480,137

Goodwill on acquisition

$ 167,804

[1] The additional consideration represents the cash to be received from the FDIC for the difference between the net liabilities assumed and the net premium paid on the transaction.

In accordance with ASC Topic 805, the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are subject to refinement up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values become available, and thus the recognized goodwill may increase or decrease. During the second and third quarters of 2015, retrospective adjustments were made to the estimated fair values of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of the Doral Bank Transaction to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. The retrospective adjustments resulted in a decrease of $2.1 million to the initial fair value estimate of the mortgage servicing rights, a decrease in other liabilities assumed of $0.5 million and, an increase of $2.6 million in the receivable from the FDIC related to the acquisition cost of deposits, all of which were adjusted against goodwill.

During the fourth quarter of 2015 the Corporation early adopted ASU 2015-16 “Business Combination”. Accordingly, adjustments to the initial fair value estimates identified during the measurement period were recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts were determined. Pursuant to ASU 2015-16, adjustments were made effective in the fourth quarter of 2015 to the estimated fair values of assets and liabilities assumed with the Doral Bank Transaction to reflect new information obtained during the measurement period about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the acquisition-date fair value measurements.

17


Table of Contents

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation recorded adjustments to its initial fair value estimates in connection with the Doral Bank Transaction. As a result, the discount on the loans increased by $4.7 million with a corresponding increase to goodwill.

The following table presents the principal changes in fair value and the revised amounts recorded during the measurement period.

(In thousands)

February 27, 2015
As recasted [a]
February 27, 2015
As previously
reported [b]
Change

Assets:

Loans

$ 1,513,867 $ 1,665,756 $ (151,889 )

Goodwill

167,804 41,633 126,171

Core deposit intangible

12,810 23,572 (10,762 )

Receivable from the FDIC

480,137 441,721 38,416

Other assets

626,177 626,177

Total assets

$ 2,800,795 $ 2,798,859 $ 1,936

Liabilities:

Deposits

$ 2,203,391 $ 2,201,455 $ 1,936

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank

547,187 547,187

Other liabilities

50,217 50,217

Total liabilities

$ 2,800,795 $ 2,798,859 $ 1,936

[a] Amounts reported include retrospective adjustments during the measurement period, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, related to the Doral Bank Transaction.
[b] Amounts are presented as previously reported as of September 30, 2015.

The impact in the results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 as a result of the recasting was an increase in net income of approximately $0.6 million as detailed in the following table:

Quarter ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

As recasted As reported Difference

Net Interest Income

$ 10,306 $ 9,768 $ 538

Non-Interest Income

4,262 4,262

Operating Expenses

14,398 14,488 (90 )

Income Before Taxes

$ 170 $ (458 ) $ 628

18


Table of Contents

Note 6 – Restrictions on cash and due from banks and certain securities

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries, BPPR and BPNA, are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Fed”) or other banks. Those required average reserve balances amounted to $ 1.1 billion at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$ 1.1 billion). Cash and due from banks, as well as other short-term, highly liquid securities, are used to cover the required average reserve balances.

At March 31, 2016, the Corporation held $52 million in restricted assets in the form of funds deposited in money market accounts, trading account securities and investment securities available for sale (December 31, 2015—$44 million). The amounts held in trading account securities and investment securities available for sale consist primarily of restricted assets held for the Corporation’s non-qualified retirement plans and fund deposits guaranteeing possible liens or encumbrances over the title of insured properties.

19


Table of Contents

Note 7 – Investment securities available-for-sale

The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available-for-sale at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

At March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Weighted
average
yield

U.S. Treasury securities

Within 1 year

$ 24,665 $ 143 $ $ 24,808 4.92 %

After 1 to 5 years

1,281,481 6,792 1,288,273 1.03

After 5 to 10 years

9,939 332 10,271 1.99

Total U.S. Treasury securities

1,316,085 7,267 1,323,352 1.11

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

After 1 to 5 years

904,631 5,221 109 909,743 1.33

After 5 to 10 years

250 3 253 5.64

After 10 years

23,000 58 22,942 3.24

Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

927,881 5,224 167 932,938 1.38

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

After 1 to 5 years

7,292 176 7,116 3.88

After 5 to 10 years

5,925 1 1,963 3,963 4.02

After 10 years

18,604 1 5,954 12,651 6.99

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

31,821 2 8,093 23,730 5.72

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

Within 1 year

282 282 0.95

After 1 to 5 years

20,257 918 21,175 2.86

After 5 to 10 years

41,078 818 41,896 2.86

After 10 years

1,447,516 14,027 11,325 1,450,218 1.98

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

1,509,133 15,763 11,325 1,513,571 2.01

Mortgage-backed securities

Within 1 year

25 25 4.80

After 1 to 5 years

20,808 990 6 21,792 4.64

After 5 to 10 years

281,359 6,195 2 287,552 2.43

After 10 years

2,485,109 50,510 1,282 2,534,337 2.76

Total mortgage-backed securities

2,787,301 57,695 1,290 2,843,706 2.74

Equity securities (without contractual maturity)

1,351 1,090 2 2,439 7.82

Other

After 1 to 5 years

8,819 10 8,829 1.72

After 5 to 10 years

1,220 45 1,265 3.62

Total other

10,039 55 10,094 1.95

Total investment securities available-for-sale [1]

$ 6,583,611 $ 87,096 $ 20,877 $ 6,649,830 2.07 %

[1] Includes $2.2 billion pledged to secure public and trust deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, credit facilities and loan servicing agreements that the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, of which $1.3 billion serve as collateral for public funds.

20


Table of Contents
At December 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Weighted
average
yield

U.S. Treasury securities

Within 1 year

$ 24,861 $ 335 $ $ 25,196 4.31 %

After 1 to 5 years

1,149,807 365 1,999 1,148,173 1.03

After 5 to 10 years

9,937 22 9,959 1.99

Total U.S. Treasury securities

1,184,605 722 1,999 1,183,328 1.11

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

After 1 to 5 years

919,819 1,337 4,808 916,348 1.33

After 5 to 10 years

250 1 251 5.64

After 10 years

23,000 42 23,042 3.22

Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

943,069 1,380 4,808 939,641 1.38

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

After 1 to 5 years

7,227 199 7,028 3.94

After 5 to 10 years

5,925 2,200 3,725 4.02

After 10 years

18,585 6,979 11,606 6.99

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

31,737 9,378 22,359 5.74

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

After 1 to 5 years

21,446 594 37 22,003 2.81

After 5 to 10 years

44,585 733 45,318 2.85

After 10 years

1,518,662 8,137 33,283 1,493,516 1.99

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

1,584,693 9,464 33,320 1,560,837 2.02

Mortgage-backed securities

After 1 to 5 years

22,015 987 8 22,994 4.65

After 5 to 10 years

256,097 4,866 1,197 259,766 2.51

After 10 years

2,039,217 34,839 12,620 2,061,436 2.83

Total mortgage-backed securities

2,317,329 40,692 13,825 2,344,196 2.81

Equity securities (without contractual maturity)

1,350 1,053 5 2,398 7.92

Other

After 1 to 5 years

8,911 28 8,883 1.71

After 5 to 10 years

1,311 39 1,350 3.62

Total other

10,222 39 28 10,233 1.95

Total investment securities available-for-sale [1]

$ 6,073,005 $ 53,350 $ 63,363 $ 6,062,992 2.07 %

[1] Includes $2.4 billion pledged to secure public and trust deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, credit facilities and loan servicing agreements that the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, of which $1.5 billion serve as collateral for public funds.

The weighted average yield on investment securities available-for-sale is based on amortized cost; therefore, it does not give effect to changes in fair value.

Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.

There were no securities sold during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

The following tables present the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

21


Table of Contents
At March 31, 2016
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total

(In thousands)

Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

$ 73,342 $ 113 $ 19,376 $ 54 $ 92,718 $ 167

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

6,229 10 15,515 8,083 21,744 8,093

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

656,971 11,325 656,971 11,325

Mortgage-backed securities

231,705 816 80,005 474 311,710 1,290

Equity securities

48 2 48 2

Total investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position

$ 311,324 $ 941 $ 771,867 $ 19,936 $ 1,083,191 $ 20,877

At December 31, 2015
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total

(In thousands)

Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses

U.S. Treasury securities

$ 589,689 $ 1,999 $ $ $ 589,689 $ 1,999

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

390,319 2,128 181,744 2,680 572,063 4,808

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

884 164 19,490 9,214 20,374 9,378

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

331,501 4,446 814,195 28,874 1,145,696 33,320

Mortgage-backed securities

1,641,663 12,992 22,362 833 1,664,025 13,825

Equity securities

45 5 45 5

Other

8,883 28 8,883 28

Total investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position

$ 2,962,984 $ 21,762 $ 1,037,791 $ 41,601 $ 4,000,775 $ 63,363

As of March 31, 2016, the available-for-sale investment portfolio reflects gross unrealized losses of approximately $21 million, driven by U.S. Agency collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and obligations of the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions. As part of its analysis for all U.S. Agencies’ securities, management considers the U.S. Agency guarantee. The portfolio of obligations of the Puerto Rico Government is mostly comprised of securities with specific sources of income or revenues identified for repayments. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers.

Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (“OTTI”) declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired, the excess of the security’s carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a geographic area, and (7) management’s intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the debt security before a forecasted recovery occurs.

At March 31, 2016, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. However, further negative evidence impacting the factors described above with respect to the “Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions”, could result in a charge to earnings to recognize estimated credit losses determined to be other-than-temporary. At March 31, 2016, the Corporation did not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not have to sell the investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.

22


Table of Contents

The following table states the name of issuers, and the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), in which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders’ equity. This information excludes securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Investments in obligations issued by a state of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies, which are payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S. Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Amortized cost Fair value Amortized cost Fair value

FNMA

$ 2,799,998 $ 2,824,458 $ 2,649,860 $ 2,633,899

FHLB

329,822 331,546 340,119 338,700

Freddie Mac

1,221,128 1,228,096 1,088,691 1,079,956

23


Table of Contents

Note 8 – Investment securities held-to-maturity

The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

At March 31, 2016
Gross Gross Weighted
Amortized unrealized unrealized Fair average

(In thousands)

cost gains losses value yield

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

Within 1 year

$ 3,050 $ $ 1,601 $ 1,449 5.91 %

After 1 to 5 years

14,270 5,910 8,360 6.00

After 5 to 10 years

18,930 7,716 11,214 6.17

After 10 years

60,880 5,266 8,320 57,826 1.99

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

97,130 5,266 23,547 78,849 3.52

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

After 5 to 10 years

86 5 91 5.45

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

86 5 91 5.45

Other

After 1 to 5 years

2,000 26 1,974 1.81

Total other

2,000 26 1,974 1.81

Total investment securities held-to-maturity [1]

$ 99,216 $ 5,271 $ 23,573 $ 80,914 3.49 %

[1] Includes $97.5 million pledged to secure public and trust deposits that the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral.

At December 31, 2015
Gross Gross Weighted
Amortized unrealized unrealized Fair average

(In thousands)

cost gains losses value yield

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

Within 1 year

$ 2,920 $ $ 291 $ 2,629 5.90 %

After 1 to 5 years

13,655 5,015 8,640 5.98

After 5 to 10 years

20,020 8,020 12,000 6.14

After 10 years

62,222 3,604 8,280 57,546 2.08

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

98,817 3,604 21,606 80,815 3.55

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

After 5 to 10 years

86 5 91 5.45

Total collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

86 5 91 5.45

Other

After 1 to 5 years

2,000 17 1,983 1.81

Total other

2,000 17 1,983 1.81

Total investment securities held-to-maturity [1]

$ 100,903 $ 3,609 $ 21,623 $ 82,889 3.52 %

[1] Includes $57.2 million pledged to secure public and trust deposits that the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral.

Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.

The following tables present the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

24


Table of Contents
At March 31, 2016
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total
Gross Gross Gross
Fair unrealized Fair unrealized Fair unrealized

(In thousands)

value losses value losses value losses

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ $ $ 31,393 $ 23,547 $ 31,393 $ 23,547

Other

1,724 26 1,724 26

Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized loss position

$ 1,724 $ 26 $ 31,393 $ 23,547 $ 33,117 $ 23,573

At December 31, 2015
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total
Gross Gross Gross
Fair unrealized Fair unrealized Fair unrealized

(In thousands)

value losses value losses value losses

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ $ $ 33,334 $ 21,606 $ 33,334 $ 21,606

Other

1,483 17 1,483 17

Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized loss position

$ 1,483 $ 17 $ 33,334 $ 21,606 $ 34,817 $ 21,623

As indicated in Note 7 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates investment securities for OTTI declines in fair value on a quarterly basis.

The “Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions” classified as held-to-maturity at March 31, 2016 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of Puerto Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. This includes $55 million of securities issued by three municipalities of Puerto Rico that are payable from the real and personal property taxes collected within such municipalities. These bonds have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality. The portfolio also includes approximately $42 million in securities for which the underlying source of payment is not the central government, but in which it provides a guarantee in the event of default.

The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. Based on the quarterly analysis performed, management concluded that no individual debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2016. Further deterioration of the fiscal crisis of the Government of Puerto Rico could further affect the value of these securities, resulting in losses to the Corporation. The Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities held-to-maturity and it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not have to sell these investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.

25


Table of Contents

Note 9 – Loans

Loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for lines of credit with revolving privileges, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The loans which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. The Corporation measures additional losses for this portfolio when it is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all cash flows expected at acquisition plus additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after acquisition. Lines of credit with revolving privileges that were acquired as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction are accounted for under the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the Corporation’s initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income. Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed in non-accrual status when past due in accordance with the Corporation’s non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued.

The risks on loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction are significantly different from the risks on loans not covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC. Accordingly, the Corporation presents loans subject to the loss sharing agreements as “covered loans” in the information below and loans that are not subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements as “non-covered loans”. The FDIC loss sharing agreements expired on June 30, 2015 for commercial (including construction) and consumer loans, and expires on June 30, 2020 for single-family residential mortgage loans, as explained in Note 11.

For a summary of the accounting policies related to loans, interest recognition and allowance for loan losses refer to Note 2—Summary of significant accounting policies, of the 2015 Form 10-K.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation recorded purchases (including repurchases) of mortgage loans amounting to $122 million, consumer loans of $106 million and commercial loans amounting to $51 million. Excluding the impact of the Doral Bank Transaction, during the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation recorded purchases of mortgage loans amounting to $169 million. Refer to Note 5 for information on loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction.

The Corporation performed whole-loan sales involving approximately $21 million of residential mortgage loans during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 (March 31, 2015—$39 million). Also, during the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation securitized approximately $134 million of mortgage loans into Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage-backed securities and $36 million of mortgage loans into Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) mortgage-backed securities, compared to $156 million and $47 million, respectively, during the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

Non-covered loans

The following table presents the composition of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio (“HIP”), net of unearned income, by past due status at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, including loans previously covered by the commercial FDIC loss sharing agreements.

26


Table of Contents

March 31, 2016

Puerto Rico

Past due Non-covered
30-59 60-89 90 days Total loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current Puerto Rico

Commercial multi-family

$ 652 $ 168 $ 1,418 $ 2,238 $ 172,413 $ 174,651

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

46,119 3,102 103,719 152,940 2,506,513 2,659,453

Commercial real estate owner occupied

16,339 6,608 141,443 164,390 1,703,399 1,867,789

Commercial and industrial

7,267 4,297 39,529 51,093 2,615,305 2,666,398

Construction

678 372 13,133 14,183 90,961 105,144

Mortgage

352,313 134,842 823,440 1,310,595 4,789,164 6,099,759

Leasing

7,209 1,598 3,419 12,226 630,916 643,142

Consumer:

Credit cards

10,915 7,159 18,864 36,938 1,061,845 1,098,783

Home equity lines of credit

82 141 280 503 9,126 9,629

Personal

12,963 7,693 20,495 41,151 1,150,239 1,191,390

Auto

32,638 6,029 10,844 49,511 776,794 826,305

Other

1,337 282 19,220 20,839 162,145 182,984

Total

$ 488,512 $ 172,291 $ 1,195,804 $ 1,856,607 $ 15,668,820 $ 17,525,427

March 31, 2016

U.S. mainland

Past due
30-59 60-89 90 days Total Loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current U.S. mainland

Commercial multi-family

$ 32 $ $ 246 $ 278 $ 762,276 $ 762,554

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

9,556 11,155 20,711 969,937 990,648

Commercial real estate owner occupied

3,817 193 4,010 219,791 223,801

Commercial and industrial

16,935 156 84,086 101,177 781,918 883,095

Construction

15,091 671 15,762 613,952 629,714

Mortgage

18,877 514 12,069 31,460 847,982 879,442

Legacy

3,119 400 4,046 7,565 53,479 61,044

Consumer:

Credit cards

187 157 382 726 12,292 13,018

Home equity lines of credit

1,701 845 4,309 6,855 287,405 294,260

Personal

1,624 639 1,429 3,692 240,722 244,414

Auto

6 6 18 24

Other

10 10 286 296

Total

$ 70,939 $ 2,711 $ 118,602 $ 192,252 $ 4,790,058 $ 4,982,310

27


Table of Contents

March 31, 2016

Popular, Inc.

Past due Non-covered
30-59 60-89 90 days Total loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current Popular, Inc. [1] [2]

Commercial multi-family

$ 684 $ 168 $ 1,664 $ 2,516 $ 934,689 $ 937,205

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

55,675 3,102 114,874 173,651 3,476,450 3,650,101

Commercial real estate owner occupied

20,156 6,608 141,636 168,400 1,923,190 2,091,590

Commercial and industrial

24,202 4,453 123,615 152,270 3,397,223 3,549,493

Construction

15,769 372 13,804 29,945 704,913 734,858

Mortgage

371,190 135,356 835,509 1,342,055 5,637,146 6,979,201

Leasing

7,209 1,598 3,419 12,226 630,916 643,142

Legacy [3]

3,119 400 4,046 7,565 53,479 61,044

Consumer:

Credit cards

11,102 7,316 19,246 37,664 1,074,137 1,111,801

Home equity lines of credit

1,783 986 4,589 7,358 296,531 303,889

Personal

14,587 8,332 21,924 44,843 1,390,961 1,435,804

Auto

32,638 6,029 10,850 49,517 776,812 826,329

Other

1,337 282 19,230 20,849 162,431 183,280

Total

$ 559,451 $ 175,002 $ 1,314,406 $ 2,048,859 $ 20,458,878 $ 22,507,737

[1] Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio are net of $111 million in unearned income and exclude $125 million in loans held-for-sale.
[2] Includes $7.7 billion pledged to secure credit facilities and public funds that the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, of which $4.7 billion were pledged at the FHLB as collateral for borrowings, $2.5 billion at the FRB for discount window borrowings and $0.5 billion serve as collateral for public funds.
[3] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

December 31, 2015

Puerto Rico

Past due Non-covered
30-59 60-89 90 days Total loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current Puerto Rico

Commercial multi-family

$ 459 $ 217 $ 1,316 $ 1,992 $ 130,154 $ 132,146

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

166,732 12,520 84,982 264,234 2,404,858 2,669,092

Commercial real estate owner occupied

14,245 5,624 138,778 158,647 1,750,597 1,909,244

Commercial and industrial

6,010 6,059 38,464 50,533 2,607,204 2,657,737

Construction

238 253 13,738 14,229 86,719 100,948

Mortgage

344,858 162,341 863,869 1,371,068 4,756,423 6,127,491

Leasing

7,844 1,630 3,009 12,483 615,167 627,650

Consumer:

Credit cards

11,078 9,414 19,098 39,590 1,088,755 1,128,345

Home equity lines of credit

186 292 394 872 9,816 10,688

Personal

13,756 7,889 22,625 44,270 1,158,565 1,202,835

Auto

33,554 7,500 11,640 52,694 763,256 815,950

Other

1,069 298 19,232 20,599 167,885 188,484

Total

$ 600,029 $ 214,037 $ 1,217,145 $ 2,031,211 $ 15,539,399 $ 17,570,610

28


Table of Contents

December 31, 2015

U.S. mainland

Past due
30-59 60-89 90 days Total Loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current U.S. mainland

Commercial multi-family

$ 33 $ 253 $ $ 286 $ 693,647 $ 693,933

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

160 253 413 962,610 963,023

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1,490 429 221 2,140 200,204 202,344

Commercial and industrial

13,647 1,526 75,575 90,748 780,896 871,644

Construction

580,158 580,158

Mortgage

18,957 3,424 13,538 35,919 872,671 908,590

Legacy

1,160 662 3,649 5,471 58,965 64,436

Consumer:

Credit cards

327 134 437 898 13,037 13,935

Home equity lines of credit

3,149 1,114 4,176 8,439 296,045 304,484

Personal

1,836 690 1,240 3,766 168,860 172,626

Auto

6 6 22 28

Other

10 5 15 289 304

Total

$ 40,759 $ 8,242 $ 99,100 $ 148,101 $ 4,627,404 $ 4,775,505

December 31, 2015

Popular, Inc.

Past due Non-covered
30-59 60-89 90 days Total loans HIP

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current Popular, Inc. [1] [2]

Commercial multi-family

$ 492 $ 470 $ 1,316 $ 2,278 $ 823,801 $ 826,079

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

166,892 12,520 85,235 264,647 3,367,468 3,632,115

Commercial real estate owner occupied

15,735 6,053 138,999 160,787 1,950,801 2,111,588

Commercial and industrial

19,657 7,585 114,039 141,281 3,388,100 3,529,381

Construction

238 253 13,738 14,229 666,877 681,106

Mortgage

363,815 165,765 877,407 1,406,987 5,629,094 7,036,081

Leasing

7,844 1,630 3,009 12,483 615,167 627,650

Legacy [3]

1,160 662 3,649 5,471 58,965 64,436

Consumer:

Credit cards

11,405 9,548 19,535 40,488 1,101,792 1,142,280

Home equity lines of credit

3,335 1,406 4,570 9,311 305,861 315,172

Personal

15,592 8,579 23,865 48,036 1,327,425 1,375,461

Auto

33,554 7,500 11,646 52,700 763,278 815,978

Other

1,069 308 19,237 20,614 168,174 188,788

Total

$ 640,788 $ 222,279 $ 1,316,245 $ 2,179,312 $ 20,166,803 $ 22,346,115

[1] Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio are net of $108 million in unearned income and exclude $137 million in loans held-for-sale.
[2] Includes $7.3 billion pledged to secure credit facilities and public funds that the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, of which $4.3 billion were pledged at the FHLB as collateral for borrowings, $2.5 billion at the FRB for discount window borrowings and $0.5 billion serve as collateral for public funds.
[3] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

The following tables present non-covered loans held-in-portfolio by loan class that are in non-performing status or are accruing interest but are past due 90 days or more at March 31, 2016 and 2015. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more consist primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA and other insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans which are included in the Corporation’s financial statements pursuant to GNMA’s buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the option (but not the obligation) to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option.

29


Table of Contents

At March 31, 2016

Puerto Rico U.S. mainland Popular, Inc.
Accruing loans Accruing loans Accruing loans
Non-accrual past-due 90 Non-accrual past-due 90 Non-accrual past-due 90

(In thousands)

loans days or more [1] loans days or more [1] loans days or more [1]

Commercial multi-family

$ 1,178 $ $ 246 $ $ 1,424 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

32,310 11,155 43,465

Commercial real estate owner occupied

110,972 193 111,165

Commercial and industrial

38,179 332 3,398 41,577 332

Construction

3,270 671 3,941

Mortgage [3]

322,838 406,327 12,069 334,907 406,327

Leasing

3,419 3,419

Legacy

4,046 4,046

Consumer:

Credit cards

18,864 382 382 18,864

Home equity lines of credit

280 4,309 4,309 280

Personal

20,023 46 1,429 21,452 46

Auto

10,844 6 10,850

Other

18,579 588 10 18,589 588

Total [2]

$ 561,612 $ 426,437 $ 37,914 $ $ 599,526 $ 426,437

[1] Non-covered loans of $288 million accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analysis.
[2] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $ 43 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.
[3] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $161 million of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of March 31, 2016. Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $68 million in reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets.

At December 31, 2015

Puerto Rico U.S. mainland Popular, Inc.
Accruing loans Accruing loans Accruing loans
Non-accrual past-due 90 Non-accrual past-due 90 Non-accrual past-due 90

(In thousands)

loans days or more [1] loans days or more [1] loans days or more [1]

Commercial multi-family

$ 1,062 $ $ $ $ 1,062 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

33,720 253 33,973

Commercial real estate owner occupied

106,449 221 106,670

Commercial and industrial

36,671 555 3,440 40,111 555

Construction

3,550 3,550

Mortgage [3]

337,933 426,094 13,538 351,471 426,094

Leasing

3,009 3,009

Legacy

3,649 3,649

Consumer:

Credit cards

19,098 437 437 19,098

Home equity lines of credit

394 4,176 4,176 394

Personal

22,102 523 1,240 23,342 523

Auto

11,640 6 11,646

Other

18,698 61 5 18,703 61

Total [2]

$ 574,834 $ 446,725 $ 26,965 $ $ 601,799 $ 446,725

[1] Non-covered loans by $268 million accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analysis.
[2] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $ 45 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.
[3] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $164 million of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of December 31, 2015. Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $70 million in reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets.

30


Table of Contents

The following table provides a breakdown of loans held-for-sale (“LHFS”) at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 by main categories.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Commercial

$ 42,771 $ 45,074

Construction

2 95

Mortgage

82,542 91,831

Total loans held-for-sale

$ 125,315 $ 137,000

The following table provides a breakdown of loans held-for-sale (“LHFS”) in non-performing status at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 by main categories.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Commercial

$ 42,741 $ 45,074

Construction

2 95

Total

$ 42,743 $ 45,169

The following table presents loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction accounted for under ASC subtopic 310-20 as of the February 27, 2015 acquisition date:

(In thousands)

Fair value of loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-20

$ 1,178,543

Gross contractual amounts receivable (principal and interest)

$ 1,666,695

Estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected

$ 34,646

Covered loans

The following tables present the composition of loans by past due status at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 for covered loans held-in-portfolio. The information considers covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and ASC Subtopic 310-30.

March 31, 2016

Past due
30-59 60-89 90 days Total Covered

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current loans HIP [1]

Mortgage

$ 29,539 $ 15,953 $ 77,968 $ 123,460 $ 483,251 $ 606,711

Consumer

1,108 324 1,389 2,821 15,598 18,419

Total covered loans

$ 30,647 $ 16,277 $ 79,357 $ 126,281 $ 498,849 $ 625,130

[1] Includes $374 million pledged to secure credit facilities at the FHLB which are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral.

31


Table of Contents

December 31, 2015

Past due
30-59 60-89 90 days Total Covered

(In thousands)

days days or more past due Current loans HIP [1]

Mortgage

$ 31,413 $ 16,593 $ 83,132 $ 131,138 $ 495,964 $ 627,102

Consumer

1,246 444 1,283 2,973 16,040 19,013

Total covered loans

$ 32,659 $ 17,037 $ 84,415 $ 134,111 $ 512,004 $ 646,115

[1] Includes $386 million pledged to secure credit facilities at the FHLB which are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral.

The following table presents covered loans in non-performing status and accruing loans past-due 90 days or more by loan class at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Non-accrual Accruing loans past Non-accrual Accruing loans past

(In thousands)

loans due 90 days or more loans due 90 days or more

Mortgage

$ 3,408 $ $ 3,790 $

Consumer

111 97

Total [1]

$ 3,519 $ $ 3,887 $

[1] Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses.

The Corporation accounts for lines of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loans payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income over the life of the loans, if the loan is accruing interest. Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 amounted to $10 million at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$10 million).

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality accounted for under ASC 310-30

The following provides information of loans acquired with evidence of credit deterioration as of the acquisition date, accounted for under the guidance of ASC 310-30.

Loans acquired from Westernbank as part of an FDIC-assisted transaction

The carrying amount of the Westernbank loans consisted of loans determined to be impaired at the time of acquisition, which are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30 (“credit impaired loans”), and loans that were considered to be performing at the acquisition date, accounted for by analogy to ASC Subtopic 310-30 (“non-credit impaired loans”), as detailed in the following table.

32


Table of Contents
March 31, 2016 [1] December 31, 2015 [1]
Carrying amount Carrying amount

(In thousands)

Non-credit
impaired loans
Credit
impaired loans
Total Non-credit
impaired loans
Credit
impaired loans
Total

Commercial real estate

$ 1,104,257 $ 30,090 $ 1,134,347 $ 1,114,368 $ 35,393 $ 1,149,761

Commercial and industrial

83,267 519 83,786 84,765 519 85,284

Construction

8,479 6,026 14,505 8,943 6,027 14,970

Mortgage

647,739 31,627 679,366 667,023 33,090 700,113

Consumer

22,198 1,239 23,437 23,047 1,326 24,373

Carrying amount

1,865,940 69,501 1,935,441 1,898,146 76,355 1,974,501

Allowance for loan losses

(58,703 ) (4,264 ) (62,967 ) (59,753 ) (3,810 ) (63,563 )

Carrying amount, net of allowance

$ 1,807,237 $ 65,237 $ 1,872,474 $ 1,838,393 $ 72,545 $ 1,910,938

[1] The carrying amount of loans acquired from Westernbank and accounted for under ASC 310-30 which remains subject to the loss sharing agreement with the FDIC amounted to approximately $615 million as of March 31, 2016 and $636 million as of December 31, 2015.

The outstanding principal balance of Westernbank loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, amounted to $2.4 billion at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$2.4 billion). At March 31, 2016, none of the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans.

Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the Westernbank loans accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, were as follows:

Activity in the accretable yield
Westernbank loans ASC 310-30
For the quarters ended
March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015
Non-credit Credit Non-credit Credit

(In thousands)

impaired loans impaired loans Total impaired loans impaired loans Total

Beginning balance

$ 1,105,732 $ 6,726 $ 1,112,458 $ 1,265,752 $ 5,585 $ 1,271,337

Accretion

(42,000 ) (1,533 ) (43,533 ) (53,776 ) (1,921 ) (55,697 )

Change in expected cash flows

54,544 5,339 59,883 42,273 1,035 43,308

Ending balance

$ 1,118,276 $ 10,532 $ 1,128,808 $ 1,254,249 $ 4,699 $ 1,258,948

33


Table of Contents
Carrying amount of Westernbank loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30
For the quarters ended
March 31, 2016 [1] March 31, 2015
Non-credit Credit Non-credit Credit

(In thousands)

impaired loans impaired loans Total impaired loans impaired loans Total

Beginning balance

$ 1,898,146 $ 76,355 $ 1,974,501 $ 2,272,142 $ 172,030 $ 2,444,172

Accretion

42,000 1,533 43,533 53,776 1,921 55,697

Collections and charge-offs

(74,206 ) (8,387 ) (82,593 ) (114,137 ) (18,636 ) (132,773 )

Ending balance

$ 1,865,940 $ 69,501 $ 1,935,441 $ 2,211,781 $ 155,315 $ 2,367,096

Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 Westernbank loans

(58,703 ) (4,264 ) (62,967 ) (49,750 ) (18,636 ) (68,386 )

Ending balance, net of ALLL

$ 1,807,237 $ 65,237 $ 1,872,474 $ 2,162,031 $ 136,679 $ 2,298,710

[1] The carrying amount of loans acquired from Westernbank and accounted for under ASC 310-30 which remain subject to the loss sharing agreement with the FDIC amounted to approximately $ 615 million as of March 31, 2016.

Other loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

The outstanding principal balance of other acquired loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, amounted to $713 million at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$710 million). At March 31, 2016, none of the other acquired loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans.

Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the other acquired loans accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

Activity in the accretable yield - Other acquired loans ASC 310-30

For the quarters ended

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015

Beginning balance

$ 221,128 $ 116,304

Additions

4,340 50,662

Accretion

(8,555 ) (3,223 )

Change in expected cash flows

50,855 (5,319 )

Ending balance

$ 267,768 $ 158,424

Carrying amount of other acquired loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30

For the quarters ended

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015

Beginning balance

$ 564,050 $ 212,763

Purchase accounting adjustments related to the Doral Bank Transaction (Refer to Note 5)

(4,707 )

Additions

10,051 157,091

Accretion

8,555 3,223

Collections and charge-offs

(15,226 ) (9,980 )

Ending balance

$ 562,723 $ 363,097

Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 non-covered loans

(15,258 ) (16,092 )

Ending balance, net of allowance for loan losses

$ 547,465 $ 347,005

34


Table of Contents

The following table presents loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 at the February 27, 2015 acquisition date.

(In thousands)

Contractually-required principal and interest

$ 560,833

Non-accretable difference

112,153

Cash flows expected to be collected

448,680

Accretable yield

113,977

Fair value of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30

$ 334,703

35


Table of Contents

Note 10 – Allowance for loan losses

The Corporation follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology includes the consideration of factors such as current economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss experience and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on this methodology. Loan losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35. Also, the Corporation determines the allowance for loan losses on purchased impaired loans and purchased loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, by evaluating decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date.

The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous loans. The determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses includes the following principal factors:

Base net loss rates, which are based on the moving average of annualized net loss rates computed over a 5-year historical loss period for the commercial and construction loan portfolios, and an 18-month period for the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios. The base net loss rates are applied by loan type and by legal entity.

Recent loss trend adjustment, which replaces the base loss rate with a 12-month average loss rate, when these trends are higher than the respective base loss rates. The objective of this adjustment is to allow for a more recent loss trend to be captured and reflected in the ALLL estimation process.

For the period ended March 31, 2016, 44% (March 31, 2015–59%) of the ALLL for non-covered BPPR segment loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the mortgage, commercial multi-family and commercial and industrial loan portfolios for 2016, and in the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios for 2015.

For the period ended March 31, 2016, 2% (March 31, 2015—13%) of the ALLL for BPNA segment loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was concentrated in the consumer loan portfolio for 2016 and in the consumer loan portfolio for 2015.

Environmental factors, which include credit and macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rate, economic activity index and delinquency rates, adopted to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical losses. The Corporation reflects the effect of these environmental factors on each loan group as an adjustment that, as appropriate, increases the historical loss rate applied to each group. Environmental factors provide updated perspective on credit and economic conditions. Regression analysis is used to select these indicators and quantify the effect on the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses.

36


Table of Contents

The following tables present the changes in the allowance for loan losses, loan ending balances and whether such loans and the allowance pertain to loans individually or collectively evaluated for impairment for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 186,925 $ 4,957 $ 128,327 $ 10,993 $ 138,721 $ 469,923

Provision (reversal of provision)

13,369 (409 ) 10,869 1,680 18,362 43,871

Charge-offs

(8,968 ) (544 ) (15,972 ) (2,127 ) (27,379 ) (54,990 )

Recoveries

6,264 233 1,276 489 6,081 14,343

Ending balance

$ 197,590 $ 4,237 $ 124,500 $ 11,035 $ 135,785 $ 473,147

Specific ALLL

$ 55,098 $ 172 $ 41,660 $ 608 $ 24,326 $ 121,864

General ALLL

$ 142,492 $ 4,065 $ 82,840 $ 10,427 $ 111,459 $ 351,283

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 338,980 $ 2,020 $ 471,183 $ 2,391 $ 109,920 $ 924,494

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

7,029,311 103,124 5,628,576 640,751 3,199,171 16,600,933

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

$ 7,368,291 $ 105,144 $ 6,099,759 $ 643,142 $ 3,309,091 $ 17,525,427

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

Puerto Rico - Covered loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ $ $ 33,967 $ $ 209 $ 34,176

Provision (reversal of provision)

(3,149 ) 44 (3,105 )

Charge-offs

(1,221 ) (33 ) (1,254 )

Recoveries

225 3 228

Ending balance

$ $ $ 29,822 $ $ 223 $ 30,045

Specific ALLL

$ $ $ $ $ $

General ALLL

$ $ $ 29,822 $ $ 223 $ 30,045

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired covered loans

$ $ $ $ $ $

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

606,711 18,419 625,130

Total covered loans held-in-portfolio

$ $ $ 606,711 $ $ 18,419 $ 625,130

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

U.S. Mainland

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 9,908 $ 3,912 $ 4,985 $ 2,687 $ 11,520 $ 33,012

Provision (reversal of provision)

(116 ) 827 344 (450 ) 3,464 4,069

Charge-offs

(495 ) (441 ) (109 ) (2,648 ) (3,693 )

Recoveries

290 211 356 1,035 1,892

Ending balance

$ 9,587 $ 4,739 $ 5,099 $ 2,484 $ 13,371 $ 35,280

Specific ALLL

$ $ $ 1,592 $ $ 581 $ 2,173

General ALLL

$ 9,587 $ 4,739 $ 3,507 $ 2,484 $ 12,790 $ 33,107

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired loans

$ $ $ 7,909 $ $ 2,247 $ 10,156

Loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

2,860,098 629,714 871,533 61,044 549,765 4,972,154

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 2,860,098 $ 629,714 $ 879,442 $ 61,044 $ 552,012 $ 4,982,310

37


Table of Contents

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 196,833 $ 8,869 $ 167,279 $ 2,687 $ 10,993 $ 150,450 $ 537,111

Provision (reversal of provision)

13,253 418 8,064 (450 ) 1,680 21,870 44,835

Charge-offs

(9,463 ) (544 ) (17,634 ) (109 ) (2,127 ) (30,060 ) (59,937 )

Recoveries

6,554 233 1,712 356 489 7,119 16,463

Ending balance

$ 207,177 $ 8,976 $ 159,421 $ 2,484 $ 11,035 $ 149,379 $ 538,472

Specific ALLL

$ 55,098 $ 172 $ 43,252 $ $ 608 $ 24,907 $ 124,037

General ALLL

$ 152,079 $ 8,804 $ 116,169 $ 2,484 $ 10,427 $ 124,472 $ 414,435

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired loans

$ 338,980 $ 2,020 $ 479,092 $ $ 2,391 $ 112,167 $ 934,650

Loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

9,889,409 732,838 7,106,820 61,044 640,751 3,767,355 22,198,217

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 10,228,389 $ 734,858 $ 7,585,912 $ 61,044 $ 643,142 $ 3,879,522 $ 23,132,867

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 201,589 $ 5,483 $ 120,860 $ 7,131 $ 154,072 $ 489,135

Provision (reversal of provision)

(1,321 ) (6,813 ) 16,192 846 23,009 31,913

Charge-offs

(9,572 ) (10,973 ) (1,237 ) (29,699 ) (51,481 )

Recoveries

4,770 2,925 500 468 6,046 14,709

Ending balance

$ 195,466 $ 1,595 $ 126,579 $ 7,208 $ 153,428 $ 484,276

Specific ALLL

$ 69,946 $ 158 $ 42,229 $ 687 $ 25,223 $ 138,243

General ALLL

$ 125,520 $ 1,437 $ 84,350 $ 6,521 $ 128,205 $ 346,033

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 417,377 $ 9,838 $ 445,506 $ 2,924 $ 114,416 $ 990,061

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

5,984,132 88,868 5,725,741 578,195 3,237,790 15,614,726

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

$ 6,401,509 $ 98,706 $ 6,171,247 $ 581,119 $ 3,352,206 $ 16,604,787

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Puerto Rico - Covered Loans

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 30,871 $ 7,202 $ 40,948 $ $ 3,052 $ 82,073

Provision (reversal of provision)

1,995 6,276 2,802 (749 ) 10,324

Charge-offs

(14,239 ) (9,046 ) (3,386 ) (26,671 )

Recoveries

2,640 3,275 105 727 6,747

Ending balance

$ 21,267 $ 7,707 $ 40,469 $ $ 3,030 $ 72,473

Specific ALLL

$ 1,473 $ $ $ $ $ 1,473

General ALLL

$ 19,794 $ 7,707 $ 40,469 $ $ 3,030 $ 71,000

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired covered loans

$ 8,394 $ 2,336 $ $ $ $ 10,730

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

1,562,753 55,489 795,477 32,103 2,445,822

Total covered loans held-in-portfolio

$ 1,571,147 $ 57,825 $ 795,477 $ $ 32,103 $ 2,456,552

38


Table of Contents

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

U.S. Mainland - Continuing Operations

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 9,648 $ 1,187 $ 2,462 $ 2,944 $ 14,343 $ 30,584

Provision (reversal of provision)

299 662 (6,127 ) (1,810 ) 4,774 (2,202 )

Charge-offs

(450 ) (221 ) (474 ) (2,518 ) (3,663 )

Recoveries

929 67 2,302 1,251 4,549

Net recoveries (write-down)

6,081 (3,401 ) 2,680

Ending balance

$ 10,426 $ 1,849 $ 2,262 $ 2,962 $ 14,449 $ 31,948

Specific ALLL

$ $ $ 341 $ $ 381 $ 722

General ALLL

$ 10,426 $ 1,849 $ 1,921 $ 2,962 $ 14,068 $ 31,226

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired loans

$ $ $ 5,106 $ $ 2,048 $ 7,154

Loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

2,252,052 592,022 1,012,874 77,675 466,366 4,400,989

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 2,252,052 $ 592,022 $ 1,017,980 $ 77,675 $ 468,414 $ 4,408,143

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Leasing Consumer Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance

$ 242,108 $ 13,872 $ 164,270 $ 2,944 $ 7,131 $ 171,467 $ 601,792

Provision (reversal of provision)

973 125 12,867 (1,810 ) 846 27,034 40,035

Charge-offs

(24,261 ) (9,046 ) (14,580 ) (474 ) (1,237 ) (32,217 ) (81,815 )

Recoveries

8,339 6,200 672 2,302 468 8,024 26,005

Net recoveries (write-down)

6,081 (3,401 ) 2,680

Ending balance

$ 227,159 $ 11,151 $ 169,310 $ 2,962 $ 7,208 $ 170,907 $ 588,697

Specific ALLL

$ 71,419 $ 158 $ 42,570 $ $ 687 $ 25,604 $ 140,438

General ALLL

$ 155,740 $ 10,993 $ 126,740 $ 2,962 $ 6,521 $ 145,303 $ 448,259

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired loans

$ 425,771 $ 12,174 $ 450,612 $ $ 2,924 $ 116,464 $ 1,007,945

Loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

9,798,937 736,379 7,534,092 77,675 578,195 3,736,259 22,461,537

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 10,224,708 $ 748,553 $ 7,984,704 $ 77,675 $ 581,119 $ 3,852,723 $ 23,469,482

The following table provides the activity in the allowance for loan losses related to Westernbank loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30.

ASC 310-30 Westernbank loans
For the quarters ended

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015

Balance at beginning of period

$ 63,563 $ 78,846

Provision for loan losses

1,791 8,601

Net charge-offs

(2,387 ) (19,061 )

Balance at end of period

$ 62,967 $ 68,386

39


Table of Contents

Impaired loans

The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

March 31, 2016

Puerto Rico

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans - Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

$ 107,706 $ 112,100 $ 37,638 $ 13,636 $ 23,754 $ 121,342 $ 135,854 $ 37,638

Commercial real estate owner occupied

120,121 139,841 10,888 38,763 63,165 158,884 203,006 10,888

Commercial and industrial

39,347 40,849 6,572 19,407 21,525 58,754 62,374 6,572

Construction

2,020 5,472 172 2,020 5,472 172

Mortgage

418,321 460,813 41,660 52,862 62,090 471,183 522,903 41,660

Leasing

2,391 2,391 608 2,391 2,391 608

Consumer:

Credit cards

37,778 37,778 5,963 37,778 37,778 5,963

Personal

67,834 67,834 17,517 67,834 67,834 17,517

Auto

3,863 3,863 771 3,863 3,863 771

Other

445 445 75 445 445 75

Total Puerto Rico

$ 799,826 $ 871,386 $ 121,864 $ 124,668 $ 170,534 $ 924,494 $ 1,041,920 $ 121,864

March 31, 2016

U.S. mainland

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans - Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Mortgage

$ 4,774 $ 5,487 $ 1,592 $ 3,135 $ 3,903 $ 7,909 $ 9,390 $ 1,592

Consumer:

HELOCs

921 921 352 715 715 1,636 1,636 352

Personal

530 530 229 81 81 611 611 229

Total U.S. mainland

$ 6,225 $ 6,938 $ 2,173 $ 3,931 $ 4,699 $ 10,156 $ 11,637 $ 2,173

March 31, 2016

Popular, Inc.

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans - Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

$ 107,706 $ 112,100 $ 37,638 $ 13,636 $ 23,754 $ 121,342 $ 135,854 $ 37,638

Commercial real estate owner occupied

120,121 139,841 10,888 38,763 63,165 158,884 203,006 10,888

Commercial and industrial

39,347 40,849 6,572 19,407 21,525 58,754 62,374 6,572

Construction

2,020 5,472 172 2,020 5,472 172

Mortgage

423,095 466,300 43,252 55,997 65,993 479,092 532,293 43,252

Leasing

2,391 2,391 608 2,391 2,391 608

Consumer:

Credit Cards

37,778 37,778 5,963 37,778 37,778 5,963

HELOCs

921 921 352 715 715 1,636 1,636 352

Personal

68,364 68,364 17,746 81 81 68,445 68,445 17,746

Auto

3,863 3,863 771 3,863 3,863 771

Other

445 445 75 445 445 75

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 806,051 $ 878,324 $ 124,037 $ 128,599 $ 175,233 $ 934,650 $ 1,053,557 $ 124,037

40


Table of Contents

December 31, 2015

Puerto Rico

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans - Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

$ 102,199 $ 106,466 $ 30,980 $ 13,779 $ 23,896 $ 115,978 $ 130,362 $ 30,980

Commercial real estate owner occupied

118,253 137,193 12,564 38,955 63,383 157,208 200,576 12,564

Commercial and industrial

42,043 43,629 5,699 21,904 32,922 63,947 76,551 5,699

Construction

2,481 7,878 264 2,481 7,878 264

Mortgage

424,885 468,240 42,965 40,232 45,881 465,117 514,121 42,965

Leasing

2,404 2,404 573 2,404 2,404 573

Consumer:

Credit cards

38,734 38,734 6,675 38,734 38,734 6,675

Personal

68,509 68,509 16,365 68,509 68,509 16,365

Auto

1,893 1,893 338 1,893 1,893 338

Other

524 525 100 524 525 100

Total Puerto Rico

$ 801,925 $ 875,471 $ 116,523 $ 114,870 $ 166,082 $ 916,795 $ 1,041,553 $ 116,523

December 31, 2015

U.S. mainland

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans - Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Mortgage

$ 4,143 $ 5,018 $ 1,064 $ 2,672 $ 3,574 $ 6,815 $ 8,592 $ 1,064

Consumer:

HELOCs

778 796 259 783 783 1,561 1,579 259

Personal

534 534 226 81 81 615 615 226

Total U.S. mainland

$ 5,455 $ 6,348 $ 1,549 $ 3,536 $ 4,438 $ 8,991 $ 10,786 $ 1,549

December 31, 2015

Popular, Inc.

Impaired Loans – With an Impaired Loans
Allowance With No Allowance Impaired Loans - Total
Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded principal Related Recorded principal Recorded principal Related

(In thousands)

investment balance allowance investment balance investment balance allowance

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

$ 102,199 $ 106,466 $ 30,980 $ 13,779 $ 23,896 $ 115,978 $ 130,362 $ 30,980

Commercial real estate owner occupied

118,253 137,193 12,564 38,955 63,383 157,208 200,576 12,564

Commercial and industrial

42,043 43,629 5,699 21,904 32,922 63,947 76,551 5,699

Construction

2,481 7,878 264 2,481 7,878 264

Mortgage

429,028 473,258 44,029 42,904 49,455 471,932 522,713 44,029

Leasing

2,404 2,404 573 2,404 2,404 573

Consumer:

Credit Cards

38,734 38,734 6,675 38,734 38,734 6,675

HELOCs

778 796 259 783 783 1,561 1,579 259

Personal

69,043 69,043 16,591 81 81 69,124 69,124 16,591

Auto

1,893 1,893 338 1,893 1,893 338

Other

524 525 100 524 525 100

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 807,380 $ 881,819 $ 118,072 $ 118,406 $ 170,520 $ 925,786 $ 1,052,339 $ 118,072

41


Table of Contents

The following tables present the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

Puerto Rico U.S. Mainland Popular, Inc.
Average Interest Average Interest Average Interest
recorded income recorded income recorded income

(In thousands)

investment recognized investment recognized investment recognized

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

$ 118,660 $ 1,159 $ $ $ 118,660 $ 1,159

Commercial real estate owner occupied

158,046 1,393 158,046 1,393

Commercial and industrial

61,351 516 61,351 516

Construction

2,251 21 2,251 21

Mortgage

468,150 3,387 7,362 475,512 3,387

Leasing

2,398 2,398

Consumer:

Credit cards

38,256 38,256

Helocs

1,599 1,599

Personal

68,172 613 68,785

Auto

2,878 2,878

Other

485 485

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 920,647 $ 6,476 $ 9,574 $ $ 930,221 $ 6,476

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Puerto Rico U.S. Mainland Popular, Inc.
Average Interest Average Interest Average Interest
recorded income recorded income recorded income

(In thousands)

investment recognized investment recognized investment recognized

Commercial multi-family

$ 276 $ $ $ $ 276 $

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

88,773 1,140 88,773 1,140

Commercial real estate owner occupied

127,969 2,166 127,969 2,166

Commercial and industrial

170,127 4,432 125 170,252 4,432

Construction

11,553 11,553

Mortgage

438,538 4,453 4,681 13 443,219 4,466

Leasing

2,974 2,974

Consumer:

Credit cards

41,337 41,337

Helocs

1,762 1,762

Personal

71,241 206 71,447

Auto

1,984 1,984

Other

526 44 570

Covered loans

8,818 35 8,818 35

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 964,116 $ 12,226 $ 6,818 $ 13 $ 970,934 $ 12,239

Modifications

Troubled debt restructurings related to non-covered loan portfolios amounted to $ 1.2 billion at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$ 1.2 billion). The amount of outstanding commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing receivables whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings amounted $9 million related to the commercial loan portfolio at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$11 million).

A modification of a loan constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the modification constitutes a concession. For a summary of the accounting policy related to TDRs, refer to the summary of significant accounting policies included in Note 2 of the 2015 Form 10-K.

42


Table of Contents

The following tables present the non-covered and covered loans classified as TDRs according to their accruing status at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Popular, Inc.
Non-Covered Loans
March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Accruing Non-Accruing Total Related
Allowance
Accruing Non-Accruing Total Related
Allowance

Commercial

$ 170,534 $ 87,841 $ 258,375 $ 47,571 $ 166,415 $ 88,117 $ 254,532 $ 37,355

Construction

194 1,826 2,020 172 221 2,259 2,480 264

Mortgage

679,719 120,694 800,413 43,252 644,013 130,483 774,496 44,029

Leases

1,749 642 2,391 608 1,791 609 2,400 573

Consumer

104,133 12,576 116,709 24,907 104,630 12,805 117,435 23,963

Total

$ 956,329 $ 223,579 $ 1,179,908 $ 116,510 $ 917,070 $ 234,273 $ 1,151,343 $ 106,184

Popular, Inc.
Covered Loans
March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Accruing Non-Accruing Total Related
Allowance
Accruing Non-Accruing Total Related
Allowance

Mortgage

$ 2,958 $ 2,500 $ 5,458 $ $ 3,328 $ 3,268 $ 6,596 $

Total

$ 2,958 $ 2,500 $ 5,458 $ $ 3,328 $ 3,268 $ 6,596 $

The following tables present the loan count by type of modification for those loans modified in a TDR during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Puerto Rico

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
Other

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

1 1

Commercial real estate owner occupied

16 1

Commercial and industrial

6

Mortgage

20 10 112 54

Consumer:

Credit cards

175 174

Personal

261 5

Auto

2 2

Other

10

Total

489 19 114 228

43


Table of Contents

U.S. mainland

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
Other

Mortgage

11 1

Consumer:

HELOCs

1

Total

12 1

Popular, Inc.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
Other

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

1 1

Commercial real estate owner occupied

16 1

Commercial and industrial

6

Mortgage

20 10 123 55

Leasing

Consumer:

Credit cards

175 174

HELOCs

1

Personal

261 5

Auto

2 2

Other

10

Total

489 19 126 229

Puerto Rico

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
Other

Commercial multi-family

2

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 1

Commercial real estate owner occupied

2 3

Commercial and industrial

5 5

Construction

1

Mortgage

13 19 98 15

Leasing

1 12

Consumer:

Credit cards

228 187

Personal

228 14

Auto

2 2

Other

11

Total

490 47 112 202

44


Table of Contents

U.S. mainland

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
Other

Mortgage

1 8

Consumer:

HELOCs

1

Total

1 8 1

Popular, Inc.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Reduction in
interest rate
Extension of
maturity date
Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
Other

Commercial multi-family

2

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 1

Commercial real estate owner occupied

2 3

Commercial and industrial

5 5

Construction

1

Mortgage

13 20 106 15

Leasing

1 12

Consumer:

Credit cards

228 187

HELOCs

1

Personal

228 14

Auto

2 2

Other

11

Total

490 48 120 203

The following tables present by class, quantitative information related to loans modified as TDRs during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Puerto Rico

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses
as a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 $ 6,323 $ 6,307 $ 4,163

Commercial real estate owner occupied

17 3,095 3,149 136

Commercial and industrial

6 2,529 2,527 5

Mortgage

196 24,405 23,244 1,806

Consumer:

Credit cards

349 3,256 3,665 576

Personal

266 4,413 4,411 887

Auto

4 72 76 12

Other

10 23 24 4

Total

850 $ 44,116 $ 43,403 $ 7,589

45


Table of Contents

U.S. Mainland

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses
as a result of modification

Mortgage

12 $ 1,167 $ 1,230 $ 423

Consumer:

HELOCs

1 147 147 77

Total

13 $ 1,314 $ 1,377 $ 500

Popular, Inc.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses
as a result of modification

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 $ 6,323 $ 6,307 $ 4,163

Commercial real estate owner occupied

17 3,095 3,149 136

Commercial and industrial

6 2,529 2,527 5

Mortgage

208 25,572 24,474 2,229

Consumer:

Credit cards

349 3,256 3,665 576

HELOCs

1 147 147 77

Personal

266 4,413 4,411 887

Auto

4 72 76 12

Other

10 23 24 4

Total

863 $ 45,430 $ 44,780 $ 8,089

Puerto Rico

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses
as a result of modification

Commercial multi-family

2 $ 551 $ 551 $ 2

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

3 18,000 17,998 2,986

Commercial real estate owner occupied

5 4,759 4,552 171

Commercial and industrial

10 5,534 5,889 224

Construction

1 268 259 (166 )

Mortgage

145 15,902 16,766 1,339

Leasing

13 323 325 73

Consumer:

Credit cards

415 3,617 4,066 629

Personal

242 4,502 4,500 967

Auto

4 51 8

Other

11 29 29 5

Total

851 $ 53,485 $ 54,986 $ 6,238

U.S. Mainland

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses
as a result of modification

Mortgage

9 $ 468 $ 1,465 $ 82

Consumer:

HELOCs

1 92 9

Total

10 $ 468 $ 1,557 $ 91

46


Table of Contents

Popular, Inc.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses
as a result of modification

Commercial multi-family

2 $ 551 $ 551 $ 2

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

3 18,000 17,998 2,986

Commercial real estate owner occupied

5 4,759 4,552 171

Commercial and industrial

10 5,534 5,889 224

Construction

1 268 259 (166 )

Mortgage

154 16,370 18,231 1,421

Leasing

13 323 325 73

Consumer:

Credit cards

415 3,617 4,066 629

HELOCs

1 92 9

Personal

242 4,502 4,500 967

Auto

4 51 8

Other

11 29 29 5

Total

861 $ 53,953 $ 56,543 $ 6,329

The following tables present by class, TDRs that were subject to payment default and that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months preceding the default date. Payment default is defined as a restructured loan becoming 90 days past due after being modified, foreclosed or charged-off, whichever occurs first. The recorded investment at March 31, 2016 is inclusive of all partial paydowns and charge-offs since the modification date. Loans modified as a TDR that were fully paid down, charged-off or foreclosed upon by period end are not reported.

Puerto Rico

Defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

Loan count Recorded investment
as of first default date

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 $ 327

Commercial real estate owner occupied

6 2,456

Mortgage

27 3,235

Consumer:

Credit cards

106 1,122

Personal

43 1,139

Auto

1 17

Other

1 4

Total [1]

186 $ 8,300

[1] Excludes loans for which the Corporation has entered into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors and is accepting payments which differ from the contractual payment schedule. The Corporation considers these as defaulted loans and does not intent to return them to accrual status.

47


Table of Contents

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, there were no U.S. mainland TDRs that were subject to payment default and that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months preceding the default date.

Popular, Inc.

Defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(Dollars In thousands)

Loan count Recorded investment
as of first default date

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

2 $ 327

Commercial real estate owner occupied

6 2,456

Mortgage

27 3,235

Consumer:

Credit cards

106 1,122

Personal

43 1,139

Auto

1 17

Other

1 4

Total

186 $ 8,300

Puerto Rico

Defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2015

(Dollars In thousands)

Loan count Recorded investment
as of first default date

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1 $ 291

Commercial and industrial

1 90

Construction

2 1,192

Mortgage

22 1,695

Consumer:

Credit cards

153 1,792

Personal

22 178

Auto

5 96

Other

2 2

Total [1]

208 $ 5,336

[1] Exclude loans for which the Corporation has entered into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors and is accepting payments which differ from the contractual payment schedule. The Corporation considers these as defaulted loans and does not intent to return them to accrual status.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, there were no U.S. mainland TDRs that were subject to payment default and that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months preceding the default date.

Popular, Inc.

Defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2015

(Dollars In thousands)

Loan count Recorded investment
as of first default date

Commercial real estate owner occupied

1 $ 291

Commercial and industrial

1 90

Construction

2 1,192

Mortgage

22 1,695

Consumer:

Credit cards

153 1,792

Personal

22 178

Auto

5 96

Other

2 2

Total

208 $ 5,336

Commercial, consumer and mortgage loans modified in a TDR are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the Corporation evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The allowance for loan losses may be increased or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.

Credit Quality

The following table presents the outstanding balance, net of unearned income, of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio based on the Corporation’s assignment of obligor risk ratings as defined at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

48


Table of Contents

March 31, 2016

Special Pass/

(In thousands)

Watch Mention Substandard Doubtful Loss Sub-total Unrated Total

Puerto Rico [1]

Commercial multi-family

$ 2,899 $ 1,021 $ 6,917 $ $ $ 10,837 $ 163,814 $ 174,651

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

320,015 417,911 389,243 1,127,169 1,532,284 2,659,453

Commercial real estate owner occupied

355,306 145,492 431,370 2,056 934,224 933,565 1,867,789

Commercial and industrial

174,205 135,002 247,095 635 45 556,982 2,109,416 2,666,398

Total Commercial

852,425 699,426 1,074,625 2,691 45 2,629,212 4,739,079 7,368,291

Construction

4,015 6,028 18,165 28,208 76,936 105,144

Mortgage

4,566 3,337 218,542 226,445 5,873,314 6,099,759

Leasing

3,399 20 3,419 639,723 643,142

Consumer:

Credit cards

18,864 18,864 1,079,919 1,098,783

HELOCs

280 280 9,349 9,629

Personal

1,668 1,066 21,013 23,747 1,167,643 1,191,390

Auto

10,811 33 10,844 815,461 826,305

Other

18,727 440 19,167 163,817 182,984

Total Consumer

1,668 1,066 69,695 473 72,902 3,236,189 3,309,091

Total Puerto Rico

$ 862,674 $ 709,857 $ 1,384,426 $ 2,691 $ 538 $ 2,960,186 $ 14,565,241 $ 17,525,427

U.S. mainland

Commercial multi-family

$ 12,264 $ 7,147 $ 985 $ $ $ 20,396 $ 742,158 $ 762,554

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

38,732 4,054 25,414 68,200 922,448 990,648

Commercial real estate owner occupied

7,386 204 3,882 11,472 212,329 223,801

Commercial and industrial

9,671 3,759 131,844 145,274 737,821 883,095

Total Commercial

68,053 15,164 162,125 245,342 2,614,756 2,860,098

Construction

32,041 22,456 54,497 575,217 629,714

Mortgage

12,068 12,068 867,374 879,442

Legacy

1,678 1,186 6,200 9,064 51,980 61,044

Consumer:

Credit cards

382 382 12,636 13,018

HELOCs

2,013 2,296 4,309 289,951 294,260

Personal

689 740 1,429 242,985 244,414

Auto

6 6 18 24

Other

10 10 286 296

Total Consumer

3,090 3,046 6,136 545,876 552,012

Total U.S. mainland

$ 69,731 $ 48,391 $ 205,939 $ $ 3,046 $ 327,107 $ 4,655,203 $ 4,982,310

Popular, Inc.

Commercial multi-family

$ 15,163 $ 8,168 $ 7,902 $ $ $ 31,233 $ 905,972 $ 937,205

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

358,747 421,965 414,657 1,195,369 2,454,732 3,650,101

Commercial real estate owner occupied

362,692 145,696 435,252 2,056 945,696 1,145,894 2,091,590

Commercial and industrial

183,876 138,761 378,939 635 45 702,256 2,847,237 3,549,493

Total Commercial

920,478 714,590 1,236,750 2,691 45 2,874,554 7,353,835 10,228,389

Construction

4,015 38,069 40,621 82,705 652,153 734,858

Mortgage

4,566 3,337 230,610 238,513 6,740,688 6,979,201

Legacy

1,678 1,186 6,200 9,064 51,980 61,044

Leasing

3,399 20 3,419 639,723 643,142

Consumer:

Credit cards

19,246 19,246 1,092,555 1,111,801

HELOCs

2,293 2,296 4,589 299,300 303,889

Personal

1,668 1,066 21,702 740 25,176 1,410,628 1,435,804

Auto

10,817 33 10,850 815,479 826,329

Other

18,727 450 19,177 164,103 183,280

Total Consumer

1,668 1,066 72,785 3,519 79,038 3,782,065 3,861,103

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 932,405 $ 758,248 $ 1,590,365 $ 2,691 $ 3,584 $ 3,287,293 $ 19,220,444 $ 22,507,737

49


Table of Contents

The following table presents the weighted average obligor risk rating at March 31, 2016 for those classifications that consider a range of rating scales.

Weighted average obligor risk rating (Scales 11 and 12) (Scales 1 through 8)
Puerto Rico: [1] Substandard Pass

Commercial multi-family

11.17 6.04

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

11.08 6.67

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11.25 7.05

Commercial and industrial

11.14 7.10

Total Commercial

11.16 6.93

Construction

11.18 7.50

U.S. mainland: Substandard Pass

Commercial multi-family

11.25 7.15

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

11.44 6.98

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11.05 6.94

Commercial and industrial

11.63 6.16

Total Commercial

11.59 6.80

Construction

11.03 7.76

Legacy

11.18 7.78

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

50


Table of Contents

December 31, 2015

Special Pass/

(In thousands)

Watch Mention Substandard Doubtful Loss Sub-total Unrated Total

Puerto Rico [1]

Commercial multi-family

$ 1,750 $ 1,280 $ 8,103 $ $ $ 11,133 $ 121,013 $ 132,146

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

319,564 423,095 399,076 1,141,735 1,527,357 2,669,092

Commercial real estate owner occupied

316,079 162,395 436,442 1,915 916,831 992,413 1,909,244

Commercial and industrial

187,620 146,216 256,821 690 29 591,376 2,066,361 2,657,737

Total Commercial

825,013 732,986 1,100,442 2,605 29 2,661,075 4,707,144 7,368,219

Construction

7,269 5,522 19,806 32,597 68,351 100,948

Mortgage

4,810 2,794 238,002 245,606 5,881,885 6,127,491

Leasing

3,009 3,009 624,641 627,650

Consumer:

Credit cards

19,098 19,098 1,109,247 1,128,345

HELOCs

394 394 10,294 10,688

Personal

1,606 1,448 23,116 26,170 1,176,665 1,202,835

Auto

11,609 30 11,639 804,311 815,950

Other

18,656 575 19,231 169,253 188,484

Total Consumer

1,606 1,448 72,873 605 76,532 3,269,770 3,346,302

Total Puerto Rico

$ 838,698 $ 742,750 $ 1,434,132 $ 2,605 $ 634 $ 3,018,819 $ 14,551,791 $ 17,570,610

U.S. mainland

Commercial multi-family

$ 14,129 $ 7,189 $ 427 $ $ $ 21,745 $ 672,188 $ 693,933

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

57,450 6,741 16,646 80,837 882,186 963,023

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11,978 1,074 2,967 16,019 186,325 202,344

Commercial and industrial

10,827 5,344 131,933 148,104 723,540 871,644

Total Commercial

94,384 20,348 151,973 266,705 2,464,239 2,730,944

Construction

15,091 16,948 18,856 50,895 529,263 580,158

Mortgage

13,537 13,537 895,053 908,590

Legacy

1,823 1,973 6,134 9,930 54,506 64,436

Consumer:

Credit cards

13,935 13,935

HELOCs

1,550 2,626 4,176 300,308 304,484

Personal

637 603 1,240 171,386 172,626

Auto

28 28

Other

5 5 299 304

Total Consumer

2,187 3,234 5,421 485,956 491,377

Total U.S. mainland

$ 111,298 $ 39,269 $ 192,687 $ $ 3,234 $ 346,488 $ 4,429,017 $ 4,775,505

Popular, Inc.

Commercial multi-family

$ 15,879 $ 8,469 $ 8,530 $ $ $ 32,878 $ 793,201 $ 826,079

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

377,014 429,836 415,722 1,222,572 2,409,543 3,632,115

Commercial real estate owner occupied

328,057 163,469 439,409 1,915 932,850 1,178,738 2,111,588

Commercial and industrial

198,447 151,560 388,754 690 29 739,480 2,789,901 3,529,381

Total Commercial

919,397 753,334 1,252,415 2,605 29 2,927,780 7,171,383 10,099,163

Construction

22,360 22,470 38,662 83,492 597,614 681,106

Mortgage

4,810 2,794 251,539 259,143 6,776,938 7,036,081

Legacy

1,823 1,973 6,134 9,930 54,506 64,436

Leasing

3,009 3,009 624,641 627,650

Consumer:

Credit cards

19,098 19,098 1,123,182 1,142,280

HELOCs

1,944 2,626 4,570 310,602 315,172

Personal

1,606 1,448 23,753 603 27,410 1,348,051 1,375,461

Auto

11,609 30 11,639 804,339 815,978

Other

18,656 580 19,236 169,552 188,788

Total Consumer

1,606 1,448 75,060 3,839 81,953 3,755,726 3,837,679

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 949,996 $ 782,019 $ 1,626,819 $ 2,605 $ 3,868 $ 3,365,307 $ 18,980,808 $ 22,346,115

51


Table of Contents

The following table presents the weighted average obligor risk rating at December 31, 2015 for those classifications that consider a range of rating scales.

Weighted average obligor risk rating (Scales 11 and 12) (Scales 1 through 8)
Puerto Rico: [1] Substandard Pass

Commercial multi-family

11.13 6.04

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

11.09 6.67

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11.23 7.08

Commercial and industrial

11.15 7.13

Total Commercial

11.16 6.95

Construction

11.18 7.56

U.S. mainland: Substandard Pass

Commercial multi-family

11.00 7.15

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

11.02 6.92

Commercial real estate owner occupied

11.07 7.23

Commercial and industrial

11.57 6.24

Total Commercial

11.50 6.81

Construction

11.00 7.79

Legacy

11.11 7.78

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

52


Table of Contents

Note 11 FDIC loss-share asset and true-up payment obligation

In connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR entered into loss-share arrangements with the FDIC with respect to the covered loans and other real estate owned. Pursuant to the terms of the loss-share arrangements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC reimburses BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR reimburses the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid 80% reimbursement under loss-share arrangements. The loss-share agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss and recoveries sharing for ten years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2020. The loss-share arrangements applicable to commercial (including construction) and consumer loans expired during the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and provide for reimbursement to the FDIC through the quarter ending June 30, 2018.

The following table sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss-share asset for the periods presented.

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Balance at beginning of period

$ 310,221 $ 542,454

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

(4,042 ) (27,316 )

Credit impairment losses (reversal) to be covered under loss-sharing agreements

(2,093 ) 8,246

Reimbursable expenses

3,950 21,545

Net payments from FDIC under loss-sharing agreements

(88,588 ) (132,265 )

Other adjustments attributable to FDIC loss-sharing agreements

(2,820 )

Balance at end of period

$ 219,448 $ 409,844

As a result of the expiration of the shared-loss arrangement under the commercial loss-share agreement on June 30, 2015, loans with a carrying amount at June 30, 2015 of approximately $248.7 million, which were reclassified to “non-covered” in the accompanying statement of financial condition, are subject to the resolution of several arbitration proceedings currently ongoing with the FDIC related primarily to (i) the FDIC’s denial of reimbursements for certain charge-offs claimed by BPPR with respect to certain loans and the treatment of those loans as “shared-loss assets” under the commercial loss-share agreement; and (ii) the denial by the FDIC of portfolio sale proposals submitted by BPPR pursuant to the applicable commercial shared-loss agreement provision governing portfolio sales. Until the disputes described above are finally resolved, the terms of the commercial loss-share agreement will remain in effect with respect to any such items under dispute. As of March 31, 2016, losses amounting to $149 million related to these assets are reflected in the FDIC indemnification asset as a receivable from the FDIC. Refer to additional information of these disputes on Note 23, Commitments and Contingencies.

The weighted average life of the single family loan portfolio accounted for under ASC 310-30 subject to the FDIC loss-sharing agreement at March 31, 2016 is 7.92 years.

As part of the loss-share agreements, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day (such day, the “true-up measurement date”) of the final shared-loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss-share agreements, in the event losses on the loss-share agreements fail to reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true-up payment obligation is recorded as contingent consideration, which is included in the caption of other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Under the loss sharing agreements, BPPR will pay to the FDIC 50% of the excess, if any, of: (i) 20% of the intrinsic loss estimate of $4.6 billion (or $925 million) (as determined by the FDIC) less (ii) the sum of: (A) 25% of the asset discount (per bid) (or ($1.1 billion)); plus (B) 25% of the cumulative shared-loss payments (defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to BPPR minus the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC); plus (C) the sum of the period servicing amounts for every consecutive twelve-month period prior to and ending on the true-up measurement date in respect of each of the loss-sharing agreements during which the loss-sharing provisions of the applicable loss-sharing agreement is in effect (defined as the product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared- loss loans and shared-loss assets at the beginning and end of such period times 1%).

53


Table of Contents

Of the four components used to estimate the true-up payment obligation (intrinsic loss estimate, asset discount, cumulative shared-loss payments, and period servicing amounts) only the cumulative shared-loss payments and the period servicing amounts will change on a quarterly basis. These two variables are the main drivers of changes in the undiscounted true-up payment obligation. In order to estimate the true-up obligation, actual and expected portfolio performance for loans under both the commercial and residential loss sharing agreement are contemplated. The cumulative shared loss payments and cumulative servicing amounts are derived from our quarterly loss reassessment process for covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30.

Once the undiscounted true-up payment obligation is determined, the fair value is estimated based on the contractual remaining term to settle the obligation and a discount rate that is composed of the sum of the interpolated U.S. Treasury Note (“T Note”), defined by the remaining term of the true-up payment obligation, and a risk premium determined by the spread of the Corporation’s outstanding senior unsecured debt over the equivalent T Note.

The following table provides the fair value and the undiscounted amount of the true-up payment obligation at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Carrying amount (fair value)

$ 120,188 $ 119,745

Undiscounted amount

$ 168,525 $ 168,692

The increase in the fair value of the true-up payment obligation was principally driven by the regular accretion of the instrument, which was partially offset by an increase in the discount rate from 7.64% in 2015 to 7.98% in 2016. An enhancement in the methodology used to calculate the discount rate, incorporating a volume weighted adjusted price, was the driver of the increase in the discount rate.

The loss-share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow in order to receive reimbursement on losses from the FDIC. Under the loss-share agreements, BPPR must:

manage and administer the covered assets and collect and effect charge-offs and recoveries with respect to such covered assets in a manner consistent with its usual and prudent business and banking practices and, with respect to single family shared-loss loans, the procedures (including collection procedures) customarily employed by BPPR in servicing and administering mortgage loans for its own account and the servicing procedures established by FNMA or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), as in effect from time to time, and in accordance with accepted mortgage servicing practices of prudent lending institutions;

exercise its best judgment in managing, administering and collecting amounts on covered assets and effecting charge-offs with respect to the covered assets;

use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize recoveries with respect to losses on single family shared-loss assets and best efforts to maximize collections with respect to commercial shared-loss assets;

retain sufficient staff to perform the duties under the loss-share agreements;

adopt and implement accounting, reporting, record-keeping and similar systems with respect to the commercial shared-loss assets;

comply with the terms of the modification guidelines approved by the FDIC or another federal agency for any single-family shared-loss loan;

provide notice with respect to proposed transactions pursuant to which a third party or affiliate will manage, administer or collect any commercial shared-loss assets;

file monthly and quarterly certificates with the FDIC specifying the amount of losses, charge-offs and recoveries; and

maintain books and records sufficient to ensure and document compliance with the terms of the loss-share agreements.

Refer to Note 23, Commitment and Contingencies, for additional information on the settlement of the arbitration proceedings with the FDIC regarding the commercial loss-share agreement.

54


Table of Contents

Note 12 – Mortgage banking activities

Income from mortgage banking activities includes mortgage servicing fees earned in connection with administering residential mortgage loans and valuation adjustments on mortgage servicing rights. It also includes gain on sales and securitizations of residential mortgage loans and trading gains and losses on derivative contracts used to hedge the Corporation’s securitization activities. In addition, lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments to residential mortgage loans held for sale, if any, are recorded as part of the mortgage banking activities.

The following table presents the components of mortgage banking activities:

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments:

Mortgage servicing fees

$ 14,802 $ 12,248

Mortgage servicing rights fair value adjustments

(8,477 ) (4,929 )

Total mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments

6,325 7,319

Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation on loans

7,110 7,280

Trading account (loss):

Unrealized (losses) gains on outstanding derivative positions

(80 ) 17

Realized losses on closed derivative positions

(2,804 ) (1,764 )

Total trading account loss

(2,884 ) (1,747 )

Total mortgage banking activities

$ 10,551 $ 12,852

55


Table of Contents

Note 13 – Transfers of financial assets and mortgage servicing assets

The Corporation typically transfers conforming residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA and FNMA securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities and servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the corresponding agency and, as such, under seller/service agreements the Corporation is required to service the loans in accordance with the agencies’ servicing guidelines and standards. Substantially all mortgage loans securitized by the Corporation in GNMA and FNMA securities have fixed rates and represent conforming loans. As seller, the Corporation has made certain representations and warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and, in some instances, has sold loans with credit recourse to a government-sponsored entity, namely FNMA. Refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of such arrangements.

No liabilities were incurred as a result of these securitizations during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 because they did not contain any credit recourse arrangements. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Corporation recorded a net gain of $6.4 million (March 31, 2015—$6.4 million) related to the residential mortgage loans securitized.

The following tables present the initial fair value of the assets obtained as proceeds from residential mortgage loans securitized during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Initial Fair Value

Assets

Trading account securities:

Mortgage-backed securities—GNMA

$ $ 134,012 $ $ 134,012

Mortgage-backed securities—FNMA

36,236 36,236

Total trading account securities

$ $ 170,248 $ $ 170,248

Mortgage servicing rights

$ $ $ 1,870 $ 1,870

Total

$ $ 170,248 $ 1,870 $ 172,118

Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Initial Fair Value

Assets

Trading account securities:

Mortgage-backed securities—GNMA

$ $ 156,456 $ $ 156,456

Mortgage-backed securities—FNMA

46,958 46,958

Total trading account securities

$ $ 203,414 $ $ 203,414

Mortgage servicing rights

$ $ $ 2,562 $ 2,562

Total

$ $ 203,414 $ 2,562 $ 205,976

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation retained servicing rights on whole loan sales involving approximately $18.5 million in principal balance outstanding (March 31, 2015—$22 million), with realized gains of approximately $0.7 million (March 31, 2015—gains of $1.0 million). All loan sales performed during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were without credit recourse agreements.

The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations.

The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior.

56


Table of Contents

The following table presents the changes in MSRs measured using the fair value method for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Residential MSRs

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015

Fair value at beginning of period

$ 211,405 $ 148,694

Additions

2,123 5,259

Changes due to payments on loans [1]

(4,254 ) (3,789 )

Reduction due to loan repurchases

(357 ) (456 )

Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions

(3,866 ) (684 )

Fair value at end of period

$ 205,051 $ 149,024

[1] Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time.

Mortgage servicing rights as of March 31, 2016 include those acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction.

Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $20.3 billion at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$20.6 billion).

Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statements of operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, including changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value adjustments, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 amounted to $14.8 million (March 31, 2015—$12.2 million). The banking subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding loan balance. At March 31, 2016, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.29% (March 31, 2015 – 0.26%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not generally earn significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.

The section below includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the MSRs, originated and purchased.

Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights derived from loans securitized or sold by the Corporation during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

Quarters ended
March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015

Prepayment speed

5.4 % 7.3 %

Weighted average life

10.0 years 13.7 years

Discount rate (annual rate)

11.1 % 10.9 %

Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions were as follows as of the end of the periods reported:

57


Table of Contents
Originated MSRs

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Fair value of servicing rights

$ 95,043 $ 98,648

Weighted average life

7.3 years 7.3 years

Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate)

6.0 % 6.0 %

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$ (2,376 ) $ (2,488 )

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

$ (4,982 ) $ (5,241 )

Weighted average discount rate (annual rate)

11.5 % 11.5 %

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$ (3,853 ) $ (4,083 )

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

$ (7,723 ) $ (8,206 )

The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions were as follows as of the end of the periods reported:

Purchased MSRs

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Fair value of servicing rights

$ 110,008 $ 112,757

Weighted average life

6.2 years 6.2 years

Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate)

6.7 % 6.9 %

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$ (2,795 ) $ (2,871 )

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

$ (5,842 ) $ (6,034 )

Weighted average discount rate (annual rate)

11.0 % 11.0 %

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

$ (4,077 ) $ (4,211 )

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

$ (8,221 ) $ (8,525 )

The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

At March 31, 2016, the Corporation serviced $1.8 billion (December 31, 2015—$1.9 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the Corporation.

Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation, as servicer, has the right to repurchase (but not the obligation), at its option and without GNMA’s prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual loans meet GNMA’s specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans if the Corporation was the pool issuer. At March 31, 2016, the Corporation had recorded $146 million in mortgage loans on its consolidated statements of financial condition related to this buy-back option program (December 31, 2015—$140 million). As long as the Corporation continues to service the loans that continue to be collateral in a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security, the MSR is recognized by the Corporation. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation repurchased approximately $ 17 million (March 31, 2015—$24 million) of mortgage loans under the GNMA buy-back option program. The determination to repurchase these loans was based on the economic benefits of the transaction, which results in a reduction of the servicing costs for these severely delinquent loans, mostly related to principal and interest advances. Furthermore, due to their guaranteed nature, the risk associated with the loans is minimal. The Corporation places these loans under its loss mitigation programs and once brought back to current status, these may be either retained in portfolio or re-sold in the secondary market.

58


Table of Contents

Note 14 – Other real estate owned

The following tables present the activity related to Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”), for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016
Non-covered Non-covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 32,471 $ 122,760 $ 36,685 $ 191,916

Write-downs in value

(1,717 ) (2,016 ) (500 ) (4,233 )

Additions

1,810 24,276 4,483 30,569

Sales

(1,595 ) (8,500 ) (3,649 ) (13,744 )

Other adjustments

(615 ) (914 ) (622 ) (2,151 )

Ending balance

$ 30,354 $ 135,606 $ 36,397 $ 202,357

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
Non-covered Non-covered Covered Covered
OREO OREO OREO OREO

(In thousands)

Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Commercial/ Construction Mortgage Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 38,983 $ 96,517 $ 85,394 $ 44,872 $ 265,766

Write-downs in value

(5,887 ) (1,372 ) (9,395 ) (1,282 ) (17,936 )

Additions

2,035 21,075 4,038 5,381 32,529

Sales

(9,427 ) (13,086 ) (9,464 ) (5,822 ) (37,799 )

Other adjustments

(96 ) (572 ) (165 ) (833 )

Ending balance

$ 25,608 $ 102,562 $ 70,573 $ 42,984 $ 241,727

59


Table of Contents

Note 15 – Other assets

The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition consists of the following major categories:

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance)

$ 1,275,017 $ 1,302,452

Investments under the equity method

216,076 212,838

Prepaid taxes

174,558 180,969

Other prepaid expenses

81,300 79,215

Derivative assets

15,012 16,959

Trades receivable from brokers and counterparties

87,590 78,759

Others

306,477 321,970

Total other assets

$ 2,156,030 $ 2,193,162

60


Table of Contents

Note 16 – Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, allocated by reportable segments, were as follows (refer to Note 35 for the definition of the Corporation’s reportable segments):

2016

Purchase
Balance at Goodwill on accounting Balance at

(In thousands)

January 1, 2016 acquisition adjustments March 31, 2016

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

$ 280,221 $ $ $ 280,221

Banco Popular North America

346,167 4,707 350,874

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 626,388 $ $ 4,707 $ 631,095

2015

Purchase
Balance at Goodwill on accounting Balance at

(In thousands)

January 1, 2015 acquisition adjustments March 31, 2015

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

$ 250,109 $ 3,899 $ $ 254,008

Banco Popular North America

215,567 38,735 254,302

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 465,676 $ 42,634 $ $ 508,310

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation recorded adjustments to its initial fair value estimates in connection with the Doral Bank Transaction. As a result, the discount on the loans increased by $4.7 million with a corresponding increase to goodwill. The goodwill recorded during the first quarter of 2015 was related to the Doral Bank Transaction. Refer to Note 5, Business Combination, for additional information.

The following tables present the gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses by reportable segments.

March 31, 2016

Balance at Balance at Balance at Balance at
January 1, Accumulated January 1, March 31, Accumulated March 31,
2016 impairment 2016 2016 impairment 2016

(In thousands)

(gross amounts) losses (net amounts) (gross amounts) losses (net amounts)

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

$ 280,221 $ $ 280,221 $ 280,221 $ $ 280,221

Banco Popular North America

510,578 164,411 346,167 515,285 164,411 350,874

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 790,799 $ 164,411 $ 626,388 $ 795,506 $ 164,411 $ 631,095

61


Table of Contents

December 31, 2015

Balance at Balance at Balance at Balance at
January 1, Accumulated January 1, December 31, Accumulated December 31,
2015 impairment 2015 2015 impairment 2015

(In thousands)

(gross amounts) losses (net amounts) (gross amounts) losses (net amounts)

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

$ 250,109 $ $ 250,109 $ 280,221 $ $ 280,221

Banco Popular North America

379,978 164,411 215,567 510,578 164,411 346,167

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 630,087 $ 164,411 $ 465,676 $ 790,799 $ 164,411 $ 626,388

Other Intangible Assets

At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Corporation had $ 6.1 million of identifiable intangible assets, with indefinite useful lives, mostly associated with E-LOAN’s trademark.

The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:

Gross Net
Carrying Accumulated Carrying

(In thousands)

Amount Amortization Value

March 31, 2016

Core deposits

$ 63,539 $ 40,132 $ 23,407

Other customer relationships

36,786 12,227 24,559

Total other intangible assets

$ 100,325 $ 52,359 $ 47,966

December 31, 2015

Core deposits

$ 63,539 $ 38,464 $ 25,075

Other customer relationships

37,665 10,745 26,920

Total other intangible assets

$ 101,204 $ 49,209 $ 51,995

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation recognized $ 3.1 million in amortization expense related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (March 31, 2015—$ 2.1 million).

The following table presents the estimated amortization of the intangible assets with definite useful lives for each of the following periods:

(In thousands)

Remaining 2016

$ 9,030

Year 2017

9,378

Year 2018

9,286

Year 2019

9,042

Year 2020

4,967

Year 2021

2,157

62


Table of Contents

Note 17 – Deposits

Total interest bearing deposits as of the end of the periods presented consisted of:

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Savings accounts

$ 7,307,272 $ 7,010,391

NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits

5,957,465 5,632,449

Total savings, NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits

13,264,737 12,642,840

Certificates of deposit:

Under $100,000

3,798,028 4,014,359

$100,000 and over

4,079,735 4,151,009

Total certificates of deposit

7,877,763 8,165,368

Total interest bearing deposits

$ 21,142,500 $ 20,808,208

A summary of certificates of deposit by maturity at March 31, 2016 follows:

(In thousands)

2016

$ 3,780,813

2017

1,452,245

2018

800,872

2019

517,844

2020

974,612

2021 and thereafter

351,377

Total certificates of deposit

$ 7,877,763

At March 31, 2016, the Corporation had brokered deposits amounting to $ 0.9 billion (December 31, 2015—$ 1.3 billion).

The aggregate amount of overdrafts in demand deposit accounts that were reclassified to loans was $9 million at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$11 million).

63


Table of Contents

Note 18 – Borrowings

The following table presents the composition of fed funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Federal funds purchased

$ 50,000 $ 50,000

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

710,154 712,145

Total federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 760,154 $ 762,145

The following table presents information related to the Corporation’s repurchase transactions accounted for as secured borrowings that are collateralized with investment securities available-for-sale, other assets held-for-trading purposes or which have been obtained under agreements to resell. It is the Corporation’s policy to maintain effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Repurchase agreements accounted for as secured borrowings

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Repurchase Repurchase

(In thousands)

liability liability

Obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities

Within 30 days

$ 87,809 $ 243,708

After 30 to 90 days

54,361

After 90 days

192,238 23,366

Total obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities

334,408 267,074

Mortgage-backed securities

Within 30 days

28,340 124,878

After 30 to 90 days

57,224 154,582

After 90 days

264,321 142,441

Total mortgage-backed securities

349,885 421,901

Collateralized mortgage obligations

Within 30 days

10,458 10,298

After 30 to 90 days

12,872

After 90 days

15,403

Total collateralized mortgage obligations

25,861 23,170

Total

$ 710,154 $ 712,145

Repurchase agreements in portfolio are generally short-term, often overnight and Popular acts as borrowers transferring assets to the counterparty. As such our risk is very limited. We manage the liquidity risks arising from secured funding by sourcing funding globally from a diverse group of counterparties, providing a range of securities collateral and pursuing longer durations, when appropriate.

The following table presents the composition of other short-term borrowings at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Securities sold not yet purchased

$ 5,170 $

Others

1,200 1,200

Total other short-term borrowings

$ 6,370 $ 1,200

Note: Refer to the Corporation’s 2015 Form 10-K for rates information at December 31, 2015.

64


Table of Contents

The following table presents the composition of notes payable at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Advances with the FHLB with maturities ranging from 2016 through 2029 paying interest at monthly fixed rates ranging from 0.71% to 4.19 % (2015—0.45% to 4.19%)

$ 638,848 $ 747,072

Advances with the FHLB maturing on 2019 paying interest monthly at a floating rate of 0.34% over the 1 month LIBOR

13,000

Advances with the FHLB with maturities ranging from 2017 through 2019 paying interest quarterly at a floating rate from 0.01% to 0.24% over the 3 month LIBOR

30,313 14,429

Unsecured senior debt securities maturing on 2019 paying interest semiannually at a fixed rate of 7.00%, net of debt issuance costs of $6,775 (2015—$7,296)

443,225 442,704

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities) with maturities ranging from 2027 to 2034 with fixed interest rates ranging from 6.125% to 8.327%, net of debt issuance costs of $497 (2015—$505)

439,303 439,295

Others

18,779 19,008

Total notes payable

$ 1,583,468 $ 1,662,508

Note: Refer to the Corporation’s 2015 Form 10-K for rates information at December 31, 2015.

At March 31, 2016, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries had credit facilities authorized with the FHLB and the Federal Reserve discount window aggregating to $4.1 billion and $1.3 billion (December 31, 2015—$3.9 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively), which were collateralized by loans held-in-portfolio. At March 31, 2016, the Corporation used $922 million of the available credit facility with the FHLB (December 31, 2015—$762 million), which includes $240 million used for a municipal letter of credit to secure deposits, while the borrowing capacity at the discount window remains unused.

A breakdown of borrowings by contractual maturities at March 31, 2016 is included in the table below.

Fed funds purchased
and assets sold under Short-term

(In thousands)

agreements to repurchase borrowings Notes payable Total

Year

2016

$ 760,154 $ 6,370 $ 145,402 $ 911,926

2017

90,939 90,939

2018

144,503 144,503

2019

551,314 551,314

2020

92,529 92,529

Later years

558,781 558,781

Total borrowings

$ 760,154 $ 6,370 $ 1,583,468 $ 2,349,992

65


Table of Contents

Note 19 – Offsetting of financial assets and liabilities

The following tables present the potential effect of rights of setoff associated with the Corporation’s recognized financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

As of March 31, 2016

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position

(In thousands)

Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets
Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Net Amounts of
Assets
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Securities
Collateral
Received
Cash
Collateral
Received
Net
Amount

Derivatives

$ 15,012 $ $ 15,012 $ 35 $ $ $ 14,977

Reverse repurchase agreements

97,830 97,830 97,830

Total

$ 112,842 $ $ 112,842 $ 35 $ 97,830 $ $ 14,977

As of March 31, 2016

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position

(In thousands)

Gross Amount
of Recognized
Liabilities
Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Net Amounts of
Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Securities
Collateral
Pledged
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
Net
Amount

Derivatives

$ 12,068 $ $ 12,068 $ 35 $ 3,153 $ $ 8,880

Repurchase agreements

710,154 710,154 710,154

Total

$ 722,222 $ $ 722,222 $ 35 $ 713,307 $ $ 8,880

As of December 31, 2015

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position

(In thousands)

Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets
Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Net Amounts of
Assets
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Securities
Collateral
Received
Cash
Collateral
Received
Net
Amount

Derivatives

$ 16,959 $ $ 16,959 $ 114 $ $ $ 16,845

Reverse repurchase agreements

96,338 96,338 96,338

Total

$ 113,297 $ $ 113,297 $ 114 $ 96,338 $ $ 16,845

66


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2015

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position

(In thousands)

Gross Amount
of Recognized
Liabilities
Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Net Amounts of
Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Securities
Collateral
Pledged
Cash
Collateral
Received
Net
Amount

Derivatives

$ 14,343 $ $ 14,343 $ 114 $ 4,050 $ $ 10,179

Repurchase agreements

712,145 712,145 712,145

Total

$ 726,488 $ $ 726,488 $ 114 $ 716,195 $ $ 10,179

The Corporation’s derivatives are subject to agreements which allow a right of set-off with each respective counterparty. In addition, the Corporation’s Repurchase Agreements and Reverse Repurchase Agreements have a right of set-off with the respective counterparty under the supplemental terms of the Master Repurchase Agreements. In an event of default each party has a right of set-off against the other party for amounts owed in the related agreement and any other amount or obligation owed in respect of any other agreement or transaction between them.

67


Table of Contents

Note 20 – Stockholders’ equity

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Corporation declared a cash dividend of $0.15 per share on its outstanding common stock, which was paid on April 1, 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 11, 2016. This represents a payout of approximately $15.5 million.

BPPR statutory reserve

The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPR’s net income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPR’s statutory reserve fund amounted to $495 million at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$495 million). There were no transfers between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015.

68


Table of Contents

Note 21 – Other comprehensive loss

The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss by Component [1]

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Foreign currency translation

Beginning Balance

$ (35,930 ) $ (32,832 )

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

(705 ) (581 )

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss

Net change

(705 ) (581 )

Ending balance

$ (36,635 ) $ (33,413 )

Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans

Beginning Balance

$ (211,276 ) $ (205,187 )

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss for amortization of net losses

3,346 3,065

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss for amortization of prior service cost

(580 ) (579 )

Net change

2,766 2,486

Ending balance

$ (208,510 ) $ (202,701 )

Unrealized net holding gains on investments

Beginning Balance

$ (9,560 ) $ 8,465

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

73,351 34,285

Net change

73,351 34,285

Ending balance

$ 63,791 $ 42,750

Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges

Beginning Balance

$ (120 ) $ (318 )

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

(1,219 ) (1,546 )

Amounts reclassified from other accumulated other comprehensive loss

943 828

Net change

(276 ) (718 )

Ending balance

$ (396 ) $ (1,036 )

Total

$ (181,750 ) $ (194,400 )

[1] All amounts presented are net of tax.

69


Table of Contents

The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Affected Line Item in the Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

2016 2015

Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans

Amortization of net losses

Personnel costs

$ (5,486 ) $ (5,025 )

Amortization of prior service cost

Personnel costs

950 950

Total before tax

(4,536 ) (4,075 )

Income tax benefit

1,770 1,589

Total net of tax

$ (2,766 ) $ (2,486 )

Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges

Forward contracts

Mortgage banking activities

$ (1,545 ) $ (1,358 )

Total before tax

(1,545 ) (1,358 )

Income tax benefit

602 530

Total net of tax

$ (943 ) $ (828 )

Total reclassification adjustments, net of tax

$ (3,709 ) $ (3,314 )

70


Table of Contents

Note 22 – Guarantees

At March 31, 2016 the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.7 million (December 31, 2015—$0.5 million), which represents the unamortized balance of the obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit. Management does not anticipate any material losses related to these instruments.

From time to time, the Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral for the mortgage-backed securities. The Corporation has not sold any mortgage loans subject to credit recourse since 2009. At March 31, 2016 the Corporation serviced $1.8 billion (December 31, 2015—$1.9 billion) in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and FHLMC residential mortgage loan securitization programs. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation repurchased approximately $ 13 million of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions (March 31, 2015 $ 16 million). In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers ultimate losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property. At March 31, 2016 the Corporation’s liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $ 58 million (December 31, 2015—$ 59 million).

The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability of estimated losses related to loans serviced with credit recourse provisions during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Balance as of beginning of period

$ 58,663 $ 59,438

Provision for recourse liability

3,920 6,500

Net charge-offs

(4,589 ) (6,553 )

Balance as of end of period

$ 57,994 $ 59,385

When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses and bear any subsequent loss related to the loans. During the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, BPPR did not repurchase loans under representation and warranty arrangements. A substantial amount of these loans reinstate to performing status or have mortgage insurance, and thus the ultimate losses on the loans are not deemed significant.

From time to time, the Corporation sells loans and agrees to indemnify the purchaser for credit losses or any breach of certain representations and warranties made in connection with the sale. The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated with indemnifications and representations and warranties related to loans sold by BPPR for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

71


Table of Contents

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Balance as of beginning of period

$ 8,087 $ 15,959

Provision (reversal) for representation and warranties

106 (1,901 )

Net charge-offs

(191 ) (14 )

Balance as of end of period

$ 8,002 $ 14,044

In addition, at March 31, 2016, the Corporation has reserves for customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. These loans were sold to investors on a servicing released basis subject to certain representation and warranties. Although the risk of loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation made certain representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if not correct, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify investors for any related losses associated with these loans. At March 31, 2016, the Corporation’s reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $ 4 million, which was included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition (December 31, 2015—$ 4 million). E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008 and most of the outstanding agreements with major counterparties were settled during 2010 and 2011.

Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At March 31, 2016, the Corporation serviced $20.3 billion in mortgage loans for third-parties, including the loans serviced with credit recourse (December 31, 2015—$20.6 billion). The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantees programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At March 31, 2016, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $76 million, including advances on the portfolio acquired from Doral Bank (March 31, 2015—$31 million). To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporation’s servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.

Popular, Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries amounting to $ 0.2 billion at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$ 0.2 billion). In addition, at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.4 billion, respectively, of capital securities (trust preferred securities) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement.

72


Table of Contents

Note 23 – Commitments and contingencies

Off-balance sheet risk

The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan commitments, letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amounts of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations as it does for those reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk, whose contract amounts represent potential credit risk as of the end of the periods presented were as follows:

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Commitments to extend credit:

Credit card lines

$ 4,562,439 $ 4,552,331

Commercial and construction lines of credit

2,711,061 2,619,092

Other consumer unused credit commitments

259,134 262,685

Commercial letters of credit

1,560 2,040

Standby letters of credit

36,252 49,670

Commitments to originate or fund mortgage loans

25,079 21,311

At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $10 million for potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit.

Other commitments

At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Corporation also maintained other non-credit commitments for approximately $9 million, primarily for the acquisition of other investments.

Business concentration

Since the Corporation’s business activities are currently concentrated primarily in Puerto Rico, its results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the general trends of the Puerto Rico economy and, in particular, the residential and commercial real estate markets. The concentration of the Corporation’s operations in Puerto Rico exposes it to greater risk than other banking companies with a wider geographic base. Its asset and revenue composition by geographical area is presented in Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements.

Since February 2014, the three principal rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) have lowered their ratings on the General Obligation bonds of the Commonwealth and the bonds of several other Commonwealth instrumentalities to non-investment grade ratings. In connection with their rating actions, the rating agencies noted various factors, including high levels of public debt, the lack of a clear economic growth catalyst, recurring fiscal budget deficits, the financial condition of the public sector employee pension plans and, more recently, liquidity concerns regarding the Commonwealth and the GDB and their ability to access the capital markets. Currently, the Commonwealth’s general obligation ratings are as follows: S&P, ‘CC’, Moody’s, ‘Caa3’, and Fitch, ‘CC’.

At March 31, 2016, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $ 656 million, of which approximately $ 565 million is outstanding ($669 million and $ 578 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015). Of the amount outstanding, $ 490 million consists of loans and $ 75 million are securities ($ 502 million and $ 76 million at December 31, 2015). Also, of the amount outstanding, $ 61 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment ($ 76 million at December 31, 2015). Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain

73


Table of Contents

revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $ 504 million outstanding represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment ($ 502 million at December 31, 2015). These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality. Further deterioration of the fiscal crisis of the Government of Puerto Rico could further affect the value of these loans and securities, resulting in losses to us. At March 31, 2016, BPPR is a lender in a syndicated credit facility to PREPA and its exposure was of $40.9 million. The facility is classified as held-for-sale as BPPR has the ability and intent to sell the loan. The following table details the loans and investments representing the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government according to their maturities:

(In thousands)

Investment
Portfolio
Loans Total
Outstanding
Total
Exposure

Central Government

Within 1 year

$ $ $ $ 50,794

After 1 to 5 years

887 887 887

After 5 to 10 years

3,044 3,044 3,044

After 10 years

13,688 13,688 13,688

Total Central Government

17,619 17,619 68,413

Government Development Bank (GDB)

Within 1 year

3 3 3

After 1 to 5 years

1,092 1,092 1,092

After 5 to 10 years

360 360 360

Total Government Development Bank (GDB)

1,455 1,455 1,455

Public Corporations:

Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority

Within 1 year

27,186

After 10 years

464 464 464

Total Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority

464 464 27,650

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority

Within 1 year

40,914 40,914 40,914

After 10 years

22 22 22

Total Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority

22 40,914 40,936 40,936

Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority

After 5 to 10 years

4 4 4

Total Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority

4 4 4

Municipalities

Within 1 year

3,050 56,956 60,006 73,324

After 1 to 5 years

14,270 130,935 145,205 145,205

After 5 to 10 years

18,930 138,187 157,117 157,117

After 10 years

18,690 123,371 142,061 142,061

Total Municipalities

54,940 449,449 504,389 517,707

Total Direct Government Exposure

$ 74,504 $ 490,363 $ 564,867 $ 656,165

In addition, at March 31, 2016, the Corporation had $417 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default ($394 million at December 31, 2015). These included $339 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (December 31, 2015—$316 million). These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Under recently enacted legislation, the Governor is authorized to impose a temporary moratorium on the financial obligations of Puerto Housing Finance Authority. Also, the Corporation had $51 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $27 million of commercial real estate notes ($50 million and $28 million at December 31, 2015, respectively).

74


Table of Contents

Other contingencies

As indicated in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, as part of the loss sharing agreements related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The fair value of the true-up payment obligation was estimated at $ 120 million at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$ 120 million). For additional information refer to Note 11.

Legal Proceedings

The nature of Popular’s business ordinarily results in a certain number of claims, litigation, investigations, and legal and administrative cases and proceedings. When the Corporation determines it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, it vigorously defends itself. The Corporation will consider the settlement of cases (including cases where it has meritorious defenses) when, in management’s judgment, it is in the best interest of both the Corporation and its shareholders to do so.

On at least a quarterly basis, Popular assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For matters where it is probable that the Corporation will incur a material loss and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the Corporation establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is adjusted on at least a quarterly basis as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For matters where a material loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.

In certain cases, exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual to the extent such loss is reasonably possible, but not probable. Management believes and estimates that the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses (with respect to those matters where such limits may be determined, in excess of amounts accrued), for current legal proceedings ranges from $0 to approximately $37.3 million as of March 31, 2016. For certain other cases, management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss at this time. Any estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants in several of the current proceedings whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the numerous unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, management’s estimate will change from time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate.

While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, management believes that the amount it has already accrued is adequate and any incremental liability arising from the Corporation’s legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial position as a whole. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporation’s consolidated financial position in a particular period.

Set forth below are descriptions of the Corporation’s material legal proceedings.

PCB has been named a defendant in a putative class action complaint captioned Josefina Valle, et al. v. Popular Community Bank, filed in November 2012 in the New York State Supreme Court (New York County). Plaintiffs, PCB customers, allege among other things that PCB has engaged in unfair and deceptive acts and trade practices in connection with the assessment of overdraft fees and payment processing on consumer deposit accounts. The complaint further alleges that PCB improperly disclosed its consumer overdraft policies and, additionally, that the overdraft rates and fees assessed by PCB violate New York’s usury laws. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, including punitive damages, interest, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees and costs.

PCB removed the case to federal court (SDNY) and plaintiffs subsequently filed a motion to remand the action to state court, which the Court granted on August 6, 2013. A motion to dismiss was filed on September 9, 2013. On October 25, 2013, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint seeking to limit the putative class to New York account holders. A motion to dismiss the amended complaint was filed in February 2014. In August 2014, the Court entered an order granting in part PCB’s motion to dismiss. The sole surviving claim relates to PCB’s item processing policy. On September 10, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint to correct certain deficiencies noted in the court’s decision and order. PCB subsequently filed a motion in opposition to

75


Table of Contents

plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend and further sought to compel arbitration. In June 2015, this matter was reassigned to a new judge and on July 22, 2015, such Court denied PCB’s motion to compel arbitration and granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint to replead certain claims based on item processing reordering, misstatement of balance information and failure to notify customers in advance of potential overdrafts. The Court did not, however, allow plaintiffs to replead their claim for the alleged breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On August 12, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. On August 24, 2015, PCB filed a Notice of Appeal as to the order granting leave to file the second amended complaint and on September 17, 2015, it filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. On February 18, 2016, the Court granted in part and denied in part PCB’s pending motion to dismiss. The Court dismissed plaintiffs’ unfair and deceptive acts and trade practices claim to the extent it sought to recover overdraft fees incurred prior to September 2011. On March 28, 2016, PCB filed an answer to second amended complaint and on April 7, 2016, it filed a notice of appeal the partial denial of PCB’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs are to file a motion requesting class certification by August 19, 2016. Discovery is ongoing.

BPPR has been named a defendant in a putative class action complaint captioned Neysha Quiles et al. v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico et al ., filed in December 2013 in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (USDC-PR). Plaintiffs essentially allege that they and others, who have been employed by the Defendants as “bank tellers” and other similarly titled positions, have been paid only for scheduled work time, rather than time actually worked. The complaint seeks to maintain a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) on behalf of all individuals formerly or currently employed by BPPR in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands as hourly paid, non-exempt, bank tellers or other similarly titled positions at any time during the past three years. Specifically, the complaint alleges that BPPR violated FLSA by willfully failing to pay overtime premiums. Similar claims were brought under Puerto Rico law. On January 31, 2014, the Popular defendants filed an answer to the complaint. On January 9, 2015, plaintiffs submitted a motion for conditional class certification, which BPPR opposed. On February 18, 2015, the Court entered an order whereby it granted plaintiffs’ request for conditional certification of the FLSA action. Following the Court’s order, plaintiffs sent out notices to all purported class members with instructions for opting into the class. Approximately sixty potential class members opted into the class prior to the expiration of the opt-in period. On June 25, 2015, the Court denied with prejudice plaintiffs’ motion for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On October 20, 2015, the parties reached an agreement in principle to resolve the referenced action for an immaterial amount, subject to their reaching an agreement on the payment of reasonable attorneys’ fees. The parties submitted briefing to the Court on this issue and are currently awaiting the Court’s final determination.

BPPR and Popular Securities have also been named defendants in a putative class action complaint captioned Nora Fernandez, et al. v. UBS, et al ., filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) on May 5, 2014 on behalf of investors in 23 Puerto Rico closed-end investment companies. UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico, another named defendant, is the sponsor and co-sponsor of all 23 funds, while BPPR was co-sponsor, together with UBS, of nine (9) of those funds. Plaintiffs allege breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract against Popular Securities, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty against BPPR, and similar claims against the UBS entities. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, including disgorgement of fees and attorneys’ fees. On May 30, 2014, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their class action in the SDNY and on that same date, they filed a virtually identical complaint in the USDC-PR and requested that the case be consolidated with the matter of In re: UBS Financial Services Securities Litigation , a class action currently pending before the USDC-PR in which neither BPPR nor Popular Securities are parties. The UBS defendants filed an opposition to the consolidation request and moved to transfer the case back to the SDNY on the ground that the relevant agreements between the parties contain a choice of forum clause, with New York as the selected forum. The Popular defendants joined this opposition and motion. By order dated January 30, 2015, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate. By order dated March 30, 2015, the court granted defendants’ motion to transfer. On May 8, 2015, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in the SDNY containing virtually identical allegations with respect to Popular Securities and BPPR. Defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint on June 18, 2015. Those motions remain pending to date.

BPPR has been named a defendant in a putative class action complaint titled In re 2014 RadioShack ERISA Litigation , filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleges that certain employees of RadioShack incurred losses in their 401(k) plans because various fiduciaries elected to retain RadioShack’s company stock in the portfolio of potential investment options. The complaint further asserts that once RadioShack’s financial situation began to deteriorate in 2011, the fiduciaries of the RadioShack 401(k) Plan and the RadioShack Puerto Rico 1165(e) Plan (collectively, “the Plans”) should have removed RadioShack company stock from the portfolio of potential investment options.

76


Table of Contents

Popular was a directed trustee, and therefore a fiduciary, of the RadioShack Puerto Rico 1165(e) Plan (“PR Plan”). Even though the PR Plan directed BPPR to retain RadioShack company stock within the portfolio of investment options, the complaint alleges that a trustee’s duty of prudence requires it to disregard plan documents or directives that it knows or reasonably should know would lead to an imprudent result or would otherwise harm plan participants or beneficiaries. It further alleges that BPPR breached its fiduciary duties by (i) failing to take any meaningful steps to protect plan participants from losses that it knew would occur; (ii) failing to divest the PR Plan of company stock; and (iii) participating in the decisions of another trustee (Wells Fargo) to protect the Plans from inevitable losses.

On November 23, 2015, the parties attended a mediation session, as a result of which the parties agreed to settle this matter for an immaterial amount, with BPPR contributing approximately $45,000. On February 22, 2016, the RadioShack defendants submitted an opposition to the bar provisions of BPPR’s proposed settlement whereby they conditioned such settlement to BPPR’s agreement to a proportional methodology to any subsequent settlement. Under this scenario, BPPR could remain potentially liable for an additional proportional amount, should plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their claim and win on appeal. A settlement fairness hearing has been set for July 18, 2016.

Other Matters

The volatility in prices and declines in value that Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end investment companies that invest primarily in Puerto Rico municipal bonds have experienced since August 2013 have led to regulatory inquiries, customer complaints and arbitrations for most broker-dealers in Puerto Rico, including Popular Securities, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation. Popular Securities has received customer complaints and is named as a respondent (among other broker-dealers) in 56 arbitration proceedings with aggregate claimed damages of approximately $136 million, including one arbitration with claimed damages of $78 million in which one other Puerto Rico broker-dealer is a co-defendant. The proceedings are in their early stages and it is the view of the Corporation that Popular Securities has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted. The Government’s recent announcements regarding its ability to pay its debt and its intention to pursue a comprehensive debt restructuring, including specifically its decision on May 2, 2016 to declare a moratorium on certain principal payments on bonds issued by Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (the “GDB”), may increase the number of customer complaints (and claimed damages) against Popular Securities concerning Puerto Rico bonds, including bonds issued by GDB, and closed-end investment companies that invest primarily in Puerto Rico bonds. An adverse result in the matters described above or a significant increase in customer complaints could have a material adverse effect on Popular.

As mortgage lenders, the Corporation and its subsidiaries from time to time receive requests for information from departments of the U.S. government that investigate mortgage-related conduct. In particular, the BPPR has received subpoenas and other requests for information from the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Office of the Inspector General, the Civil Division of the Department of Justice and the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program concerning mortgages and real estate appraisals in Puerto Rico. The Corporation is cooperating with these requests.

Other Significant Proceedings

As described under “Note 11 – FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation”, in connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, on April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC with respect to the covered loans and other real estate owned “(OREO”) that it acquired in the transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the loss share agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC reimburses BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR reimburses the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid 80% reimbursement under those loss share agreements. The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow in order to receive reimbursement for losses from the FDIC. BPPR believes that it has complied with such terms and conditions. The loss share agreement applicable to the covered commercial and OREO described below provides for loss sharing by the FDIC through the quarter ending June 30, 2015 and for reimbursement to the FDIC for recoveries through the quarter ending June 30, 2018.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2010 through March 31, 2012, BPPR received reimbursement for loss-share claims submitted to the FDIC, including charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. When BPPR submitted its shared-loss claim in connection with the June 30, 2012 quarter, however, the FDIC refused to reimburse BPPR for a portion of the claim because of a difference related to the methodology for the computation of charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and

77


Table of Contents

OREO. In accordance with the terms of the commercial loss share agreement, BPPR applied a methodology for charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans that conforms to its regulatory supervisory criteria and is calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. The FDIC stated that it believed that BPPR should use a different methodology for those charge-offs. Notwithstanding the FDIC’s refusal to reimburse BPPR for certain shared-loss claims, BPPR had continued to calculate shared-loss claims for quarters subsequent to June 30, 2012 in accordance with its charge-off policy for non-covered assets.

BPPR’s loss share agreements with the FDIC specify that disputes can be submitted to arbitration before a review board under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. On July 31, 2013, BPPR filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association requesting that a review board determine certain matters relating to the loss-share claims under its commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC, including that the review board award BPPR the amounts owed under its unpaid quarterly certificates. The statement of claim also included requests for reimbursement of certain valuation adjustments for discounts to appraised values, costs to sell troubled assets and other items. The review board was comprised of one arbitrator appointed by BPPR, one arbitrator appointed by the FDIC and a third arbitrator selected by agreement of those arbitrators.

On October 17, 2014, BPPR and the FDIC settled all claims and counterclaims that had been submitted to the review board. The settlement provides for an agreed valuation methodology for reimbursement of charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and resulting OREO. BPPR applied this valuation methodology to charge-offs claimed on late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and resulting OREO during the remaining term of the commercial loss-sharing agreement which expired on June 30, 2015.

On November 25, 2014, the FDIC notified BPPR that it (a) would not reimburse BPPR under the commercial loss share agreement for a $66.6 million loss claim on eight related real estate loans that BPPR restructured and consolidated (collectively, the “Disputed Asset”), and (b) would no longer treat the Disputed Asset as a “Shared-Loss Asset” under the commercial loss share agreement. The FDIC alleged that BPPR’s restructure and modification of the underlying loans did not constitute a “Permitted Amendment” under the commercial loss share agreement, thereby causing the bank to breach Article III of the commercial loss share agreement. BPPR disagrees with the FDIC’s determinations relating to the Disputed Asset, and accordingly, on December 19, 2014, delivered to the FDIC a notice of dispute under the commercial loss share agreement.

On March 19, 2015, BPPR filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association requesting that a review board determine BPPR and the FDIC’s disputes concerning the Disputed Asset. The statement of claim requests a declaration that the Disputed Asset is a “Shared-Loss Asset” under the commercial loss share agreement, a declaration that the restructuring is a “Permitted Amendment” under the commercial loss share agreement, and an order that the FDIC reimburse the bank for approximately $53.3 million for the Charge-Off of the Disputed Asset, plus interest at the applicable rate. On April 1, 2015, the FDIC notified BPPR that it was clawing back approximately $1.7 million in reimbursable expenses relating to the Disputed Asset that the FDIC had previously paid to BPPR. Thus, on April 13, 2015, BPPR notified the American Arbitration Association and the FDIC of an increase in the amount of its damages by approximately $1.7 million. The review board in the arbitration concerning the Disputed Asset is comprised of one arbitrator appointed by BPPR, one arbitrator appointed by the FDIC and a third arbitrator selected by agreement of those arbitrators. The arbitration hearing has been scheduled for August 2016.

In addition, in November and December 2014, BPPR proposed separate portfolio sales of Shared-Loss Assets to the FDIC. The FDIC refused to consent to either sale, stating that those sales did not represent best efforts to maximize collections on Shared-Loss Assets under the commercial loss share agreement. In March 2015, BPPR proposed a third portfolio sale to the FDIC, and in May 2015, BPPR proposed a fourth portfolio sale to the FDIC.

BPPR disagrees with the FDIC’s characterization of the November and December 2014 portfolio sale proposals and with the FDIC’s interpretation of the commercial loss share agreement provision governing portfolio sales. Accordingly, on March 13, 2015, BPPR delivered to the FDIC a notice of dispute under the commercial loss share agreement. On June 8, 2015, BPPR filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association requesting that a review board resolve the disputes concerning those proposed portfolio sales. On June 15, 2015, BPPR amended its statement of claim to include a claim for the FDIC-R’s refusal to timely concur in the third sale proposed in March 2015. On June 29, 2015, the FDIC informed BPPR that it would reimburse the bank for losses arising from the primary portfolio of the third proposed sale, but only subject to conditions to which BPPR objected. The FDIC also informed BPPR that it would not concur in the sale of the remainder (the “secondary portfolio”) of the third proposed sale or in the fourth proposed sale. On September 4, 2015, BPPR filed a second amended statement of claim concerning the FDIC’s refusal to

78


Table of Contents

concur in the third and fourth portfolio sales as proposed by BPPR. On November 25, 2015, BPPR conducted an auction sale of the loans in the primary portfolio of the third proposed sale and intends to submit a claim for reimbursement of the losses arising from that sale. The review board in the arbitration concerning the proposed portfolio sales is comprised of one arbitrator appointed by BPPR, one arbitrator appointed by the FDIC and a third arbitrator selected by agreement of those arbitrators. The arbitration hearing is scheduled to be held in the fall of 2016.

On November 12, 2015, the FDIC notified BPPR that it (a) would deny certain claims included in BPPR’s Second Quarter 2015 Quarterly Certificate and (b) withhold payment of approximately $5.5 million attributed to the $6.9 million in losses claimed under the denied claims. In support of its denial, the FDIC alleged that BPPR did not comply with its obligation under the commercial loss share agreement, including compliance with certain provisions of GAAP, acting in accordance with prudent banking practices, managing Shared-Loss Assets in the same manner as BPPR’s non-Shared-Loss Assets, and using best efforts to maximize collections on the Shared-Loss Assets. BPPR disagrees with the FDIC’s allegations relating to the denied claims included in BPPR’s Second Quarter 2015 Quarterly Certificate, and accordingly, on January 27, 2016 delivered to the FDIC a notice of dispute under the commercial loss share agreement.

The shared-loss arrangement described above expired on June 30, 2015. As of March 31, 2016, BPPR had unreimbursed loss claims related to the commercial loss-sharing arrangement amounting to approximately $149 million, reflected in the FDIC indemnification asset as a receivable from the FDIC, which are subject to the arbitration proceedings described above. This figure may continue to increase to the extent that the assets that are the subject of the portfolio sales arbitration further decline in value. Until these disputes are finally resolved, the terms of the commercial loss share agreement will remain in effect with respect to any such items under dispute. No assurance can be given that we will receive reimbursement from the FDIC with respect to the foregoing items, which could require us to make a material adjustment to the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for ten years (ending on June 30, 2020), and the loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and other assets provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for five years (which ended on June 30, 2015), with additional recovery sharing for three years thereafter. As of March 31, 2016, the carrying value of covered loans approximated $625 million, mainly comprised of single-family residential mortgage loans. To the extent that estimated losses on covered loans are not realized before the expiration of the applicable loss sharing agreement, such losses would not be subject to reimbursement from the FDIC and, accordingly, would require us to make a material adjustment in the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

79


Table of Contents

Note 24 – Non-consolidated variable interest entities

The Corporation is involved with four statutory trusts which it established to issue trust preferred securities to the public. These trusts are deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”) since the equity investors at risk have no substantial decision-making rights. The Corporation does not hold any variable interest in the trusts, and therefore, cannot be the trusts’ primary beneficiary. Furthermore, the Corporation concluded that it did not hold a controlling financial interest in these trusts since the decisions of the trusts are predetermined through the trust documents and the guarantee of the trust preferred securities is irrelevant since in substance the sponsor is guaranteeing its own debt.

Also, the Corporation is involved with various special purpose entities mainly in guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions, including GNMA and FNMA. These special purpose entities are deemed to be VIEs since they lack equity investments at risk. The Corporation’s continuing involvement in these guaranteed loan securitizations includes owning certain beneficial interests in the form of securities as well as the servicing rights retained. The Corporation is not required to provide additional financial support to any of the variable interest entities to which it has transferred the financial assets. The mortgage-backed securities, to the extent retained, are classified in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition as available-for-sale or trading securities. The Corporation concluded that, essentially, these entities (FNMA and GNMA) control the design of their respective VIEs, dictate the quality and nature of the collateral, require the underlying insurance, set the servicing standards via the servicing guides and can change them at will, and can remove a primary servicer with cause, and without cause in the case of FNMA. Moreover, through their guarantee obligations, agencies (FNMA and GNMA) have the obligation to absorb losses that could be potentially significant to the VIE.

ASU 2009-17 requires that an ongoing primary beneficiary assessment should be made to determine whether the Corporation is the primary beneficiary of any of the VIEs it is involved with. The conclusion on the assessment of these trusts and guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions has not changed since their initial evaluation. The Corporation concluded that it is still not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and therefore, these VIEs are not required to be consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements at March 31, 2016.

The Corporation holds variable interests in these VIEs in the form of agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, including those securities originated by the Corporation and those acquired from third parties. Additionally, the Corporation holds agency mortgage-backed securities, agency collateralized mortgage obligations and private label collateralized mortgage obligations issued by third party VIEs in which it has no other form of continuing involvement. Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the debt securities outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, which are classified as available-for-sale and trading securities in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition. In addition, the Corporation may retain the right to service the transferred loans in those government-sponsored special purpose entities (“SPEs”) and may also purchase the right to service loans in other government-sponsored SPEs that were transferred to those SPEs by a third-party. Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 810-10, the servicing fees that the Corporation receives for its servicing role are considered variable interests in the VIEs since the servicing fees are subordinated to the principal and interest that first needs to be paid to the mortgage-backed securities’ investors and to the guaranty fees that need to be paid to the federal agencies.

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets related to the Corporation’s variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs and the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Corporation’s involvement as servicer with non-consolidated VIEs at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

80


Table of Contents

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Assets

Servicing assets:

Mortgage servicing rights

$ 156,250 $ 163,224

Total servicing assets

$ 156,250 $ 163,224

Other assets:

Servicing advances

$ 21,941 $ 24,431

Total other assets

$ 21,941 $ 24,431

Total assets

$ 178,191 $ 187,655

Maximum exposure to loss

$ 178,191 $ 187,655

The size of the non-consolidated VIEs, in which the Corporation has a variable interest in the form of servicing fees, measured as the total unpaid principal balance of the loans, amounted to $12.7 billion at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$12.8 billion).

Maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss, under a worst case scenario, that would be incurred by the Corporation, as servicer for the VIEs, assuming all loans serviced are delinquent and that the value of the Corporation’s interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery. The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss includes the fair value of the MSRs and the assumption that the servicing advances at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, will not be recovered. The agency debt securities are not included as part of the maximum exposure to loss since they are guaranteed by the related agencies.

In September of 2011, BPPR sold construction and commercial real estate loans with a fair value of $148 million, and most of which were non-performing, to a newly created joint venture, PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC. The joint venture was created for the limited purpose of acquiring the loans from BPPR; servicing the loans through a third-party servicer; ultimately working out, resolving and/or foreclosing the loans; and indirectly owning, operating, constructing, developing, leasing and selling any real properties acquired by the joint venture through deed in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure, or by resolution of any loan.

BPPR provided financing to the joint venture for the acquisition of the loans in an amount equal to the sum of 57 % of the purchase price of the loans, or $84 million, and $2 million of closing costs, for a total acquisition loan of $86 million (the “acquisition loan”). The acquisition loan has a 5-year maturity and bears a variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is secured by a pledge of all of the acquiring entity’s assets. In addition, BPPR provided the joint venture with a non-revolving advance facility (the “advance facility”) of $68.5 million to cover unfunded commitments and costs-to-complete related to certain construction projects, and a revolving working capital line (the “working capital line”) of $20 million to fund certain operating expenses of the joint venture. Cash proceeds received by the joint venture are first used to cover debt service payments for the acquisition loan, advance facility, and the working capital line described above which must be paid in full before proceeds can be used for other purposes. The distributable cash proceeds are determined based on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the respective equity ownership percentages. BPPR’s equity interest in the joint venture ranks pari-passu with those of other parties involved. As part of the transaction executed in September 2011, BPPR received $ 48 million in cash and a 24.9 % equity interest in the joint venture. The Corporation is not required to provide any other financial support to the joint venture.

BPPR accounted for this transaction as a true sale pursuant to ASC Subtopic 860-10 and thus recognized the cash received, its equity investment in the joint venture, and the acquisition loan provided to the joint venture and derecognized the loans sold.

The Corporation has determined that PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is a VIE but it is not the primary beneficiary. All decisions are made by Caribbean Property Group (“CPG”) (or an affiliate thereof) (the “Manager”), except for certain limited material decisions which would require the unanimous consent of all members. The Manager is authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the joint venture any and all documents, contracts, certificates, agreements and instruments, and to take any action deemed necessary in the benefit of the joint venture.

The Corporation holds variable interests in this VIE in the form of the 24.9 % equity interest (the “Investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC”) and the financing provided to the joint venture. The equity interest is accounted for under the equity method of accounting pursuant to ASC Subtopic 323-10.

81


Table of Contents

The initial fair value of the Corporation’s equity interest in the joint venture was determined based on the fair value of the loans and real estate owned transferred to the joint venture of $148 million which represented the purchase price of the loans agreed by the

parties and was an arm’s-length transaction between market participants in accordance with ASC Topic 820, reduced by the acquisition loan provided by BPPR to the joint venture, for a total net equity of $63 million. Accordingly, the 24.9% equity interest held by the Corporation was valued at $16 million. Thus, the fair value of the equity interest is considered a Level 2 fair value measurement since the inputs were based on observable market inputs.

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets and liabilities related to the Corporation’s variable interests in the non-consolidated VIE, PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC, and its maximum exposure to loss at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Assets

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Advances under the working capital line

$ $ 579

Advances under the advance facility

401

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ $ 980

Accrued interest receivable

$ $ 10

Other assets:

Investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings LLC

$ 10,749 $ 13,069

Total assets

$ 10,749 $ 14,059

Deposits

$ (3,347 ) $ (18,808 )

Total liabilities

$ (3,347 ) $ (18,808 )

Total net assets (liabilities)

$ 7,402 $ (4,749 )

Maximum exposure to loss

$ 7,402 $

The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss under a worst case scenario at March 31, 2016 would be not recovering the equity interest held by the Corporation, net of the deposits.

On March 25, 2013, BPPR completed a sale of assets with a book value of $509.0 million, of which $500.6 million were in non-performing status, comprised of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned, with a combined unpaid principal balance on loans and appraised value of other real estate owned of approximately $987.0 million to a newly created joint venture, PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1. The joint venture was created for the limited purpose of acquiring the loans from BPPR; servicing the loans through a third-party servicer; ultimately working out, resolving and/or foreclosing the loans; and indirectly owning, operating, constructing, developing, leasing and selling any real properties acquired by the joint venture through deed in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure, or by resolution of any loan.

BPPR provided financing to the joint venture for the acquisition of the assets in an amount equal to the sum of 57 % of the purchase price of the assets, and closing costs, for a total acquisition loan of $182.4 million (the “acquisition loan”). The acquisition loan has a 5-year maturity and bears a variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is secured by a pledge of all of the acquiring entity’s assets. In addition, BPPR provided the joint venture with a non-revolving advance facility (the “advance facility”) of $35.0 million to cover unfunded commitments and costs-to-complete related to certain construction projects, and a revolving working capital line (the “working capital line”) of $30.0 million to fund certain operating expenses of the joint venture. Cash proceeds received by the joint venture are first used to cover debt service payments for the acquisition loan, advance facility, and the working capital line described above which must be paid in full before proceeds can be used for other purposes. The distributable cash proceeds are determined based on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the respective equity ownership percentages. BPPR’s equity interest in the joint venture ranks pari-passu with those of other parties involved. As part of the transaction executed in March 2013, BPPR received $92.3 million in cash and a 24.9 % equity interest in the joint venture. The Corporation is not required to provide any other financial support to the joint venture.

BPPR accounted for this transaction as a true sale pursuant to ASC Subtopic 860-10 and thus recognized the cash received, its equity investment in the joint venture, and the acquisition loan provided to the joint venture and derecognized the loans and real estate owned sold.

82


Table of Contents

The Corporation has determined that PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is a VIE but the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary. All decisions are made by CPG (or an affiliate thereof) (the “Manager”), except for certain limited material decisions which would require the unanimous consent of all members. The Manager is authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the joint venture any and all documents, contracts, certificates, agreements and instruments, and to take any action deemed necessary in the benefit of the joint venture. Also, the Manager delegates the day-to-day management and servicing of the loans to PR Asset Portfolio Servicing International, LLC, an affiliate of CPG.

The initial fair value of the Corporation’s equity interest in the joint venture was determined based on the fair value of the loans and real estate owned transferred to the joint venture of $306 million which represented the purchase price of the loans agreed by the parties and was an arm’s-length transaction between market participants in accordance with ASC Topic 820, reduced by the acquisition loan provided by BPPR to the joint venture, for a total net equity of $124 million. Accordingly, the 24.9% equity interest held by the Corporation was valued at $31 million. Thus, the fair value of the equity interest is considered a Level 2 fair value measurement since the inputs were based on observable market inputs.

The Corporation holds variable interests in this VIE in the form of the 24.9 % equity interest (the “Investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC”) and the financing provided to the joint venture. The equity interest is accounted for under the equity method of accounting pursuant to ASC Subtopic 323-10.

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets and liabilities related to the Corporation’s variable interests in the non-consolidated VIE, PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC, and its maximum exposure to loss at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Assets

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Acquisition loan

$ 9,932 $ 35,121

Advances under the working capital line

829 885

Advances under the advance facility

24,267 22,296

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 35,028 $ 58,302

Accrued interest receivable

$ 130 $ 169

Other assets:

Investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ 24,572 $ 25,094

Total assets

$ 59,730 $ 83,565

Deposits

$ (10,360 ) $ (11,772 )

Total liabilities

$ (10,360 ) $ (11,772 )

Total net assets

$ 49,370 $ 71,793

Maximum exposure to loss

$ 49,370 $ 71,793

The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss under a worst case scenario at March 31, 2016 would be not recovering the carrying amount of the acquisition loan, the advances on the advance facility and working capital line, if any, and the equity interest held by the Corporation, net of the deposits.

83


Table of Contents

Note 25 – Related party transactions

EVERTEC

The Corporation has an investment in EVERTEC, Inc. (“EVERTEC”), which provides various processing and information technology services to the Corporation and its subsidiaries and gives BPPR access to the ATH network owned and operated by EVERTEC. As of March 31, 2016, the Corporation’s stake in EVERTEC was 15.58%.The Corporation continues to have significant influence over EVERTEC. Accordingly, the investment in EVERTEC is accounted for under the equity method and is evaluated for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has occurred that is other than temporary.

As disclosed in its recent SEC filings, EVERTEC has announced that it will restate its financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the three year period ending in December 31, 2014 and as of the end of and for each quarterly period in 2014 and 2015. Specifically, EVERTEC identified an accounting position that required reevaluation with respect to a net operating loss pertaining to certain 2010 expenditures. These expenditures resulted in a deferred tax asset of approximately $14 million as of December 31, 2010 which is being reevaluated along with any additional related tax liabilities and the impact in subsequent periods. As of the date of this filing, EVERTEC has not completed its restatement of its financial statements and therefore Popular’s results for the first quarter of 2016 do not include the impact of any related adjustments, which would be limited to our 15.58% ownership stake. Popular does not expect that the impact of these adjustments will have a material effect on its financial statements.

The Corporation received $ 1.2 million in dividend distributions during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 from its investments in EVERTEC’s holding company (March 31, 2015—$ 1.2 million). The Corporation’s equity in EVERTEC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Equity investment in EVERTEC

$ 35,162 $ 33,590

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with EVERTEC at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Items that represent liabilities to the Corporation are presented with parenthesis.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Accounts receivable (Other assets)

$ 2,980 $ 3,148

Deposits

(21,322 ) (23,973 )

Accounts payable (Other liabilities)

(17,480 ) (16,192 )

Net total

$ (35,822 ) $ (37,017 )

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from EVERTEC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The Corporation’s proportionate share of EVERTEC’s income and changes in stockholders’ equity was immaterial for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

The following tables present the impact of transactions and service payments between the Corporation and EVERTEC (as an affiliate) and their impact on the results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. Items that represent expenses to the Corporation are presented with parenthesis.

84


Table of Contents
Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Category

Interest expense on deposits

$ (19 ) $ (11 ) Interest expense

ATH and credit cards interchange income from services to EVERTEC

6,918 6,487 Other service fees

Rental income charged to EVERTEC

1,736 1,724 Net occupancy

Processing fees on services provided by EVERTEC

(43,516 ) (39,504 ) Professional fees

Other services provided to EVERTEC

256 324 Other operating expenses

Total

$ (34,625 ) $ (30,980 )

EVERTEC had a letter of credit issued by BPPR for an amount of $ 4.2 million at December 31, 2015, which expired on February 10, 2016.

PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

As indicated in Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation holds a 24.9 % equity interest in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC and currently holds certain deposits from the entity.

The Corporation’s equity in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Equity investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

$ 10,749 $ 13,069

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Loans

$ $ 980

Accrued interest receivable

10

Deposits (non-interest bearing)

(3,347 ) (18,808 )

Net total

$ (3,347 ) $ (17,818 )

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of income (loss) from PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Share of (loss) income from the equity investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

$ (542 ) $ 1,033

85


Table of Contents

The following table presents transactions between the Corporation and PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC and their impact on the Corporation’s results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015 Category

Interest income on loan to PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

$ 11 $ 62 Interest income

PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

As indicated in Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements, effective March 2013 the Corporation holds a 24.9 % equity interest in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC and currently provides certain financing to the joint venture as well as holds certain deposits from the entity.

The Corporation’s equity in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ 24,572 $ 25,094

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC, at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Loans

$ 35,028 $ 58,302

Accrued interest receivable

130 169

Deposits

(10,360 ) (11,772 )

Net total

$ 24,798 $ 46,699

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of loss from PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC for quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Share of loss from the equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ (522 ) $ (4,335 )

The following table presents transactions between the Corporation and PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC and their impact on the Corporation’s results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015 Category

Interest income on loan to PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ 445 $ 866 Interest income

Interest expense on deposits

(1 ) Interest expense

Total

$ 444 $ 866

86


Table of Contents

Note 26 – Fair value measurement

ASC Subtopic 820-10 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market.

Level 2 - Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporation’s own assumptions about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs internally-developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value is adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporation’s credit standing, constraints on liquidity and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently. There have been no changes in the Corporation’s methodologies used to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities from those disclosed in the 2015 Form 10-K.

The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results.

87


Table of Contents

Fair Value on a Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis

The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporation’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

At March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets

Investment securities available-for-sale:

U.S. Treasury securities

$ $ 1,323,352 $ $ 1,323,352

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

932,938 932,938

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

23,730 23,730

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

1,513,571 1,513,571

Mortgage-backed securities

2,842,284 1,422 2,843,706

Equity securities

285 2,154 2,439

Other

10,094 10,094

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 285 $ 6,648,123 $ 1,422 $ 6,649,830

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ $ 4,307 $ $ 4,307

Collateralized mortgage obligations

217 1,783 2,000

Mortgage-backed securities—federal agencies

46,716 5,397 52,113

Other

12,201 663 12,864

Total trading account securities

$ $ 63,441 $ 7,843 $ 71,284

Mortgage servicing rights

$ $ $ 205,051 $ 205,051

Derivatives

15,012 15,012

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ 285 $ 6,726,576 $ 214,316 $ 6,941,177

Liabilities

Derivatives

$ $ (12,068 ) $ $ (12,068 )

Contingent consideration

(120,823 ) (120,823 )

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ $ (12,068 ) $ (120,823 ) $ (132,891 )

88


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets

Investment securities available-for-sale:

U.S. Treasury securities

$ $ 1,183,328 $ $ 1,183,328

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

939,641 939,641

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

22,359 22,359

Collateralized mortgage obligations—federal agencies

1,560,837 1,560,837

Mortgage-backed securities

2,342,762 1,434 2,344,196

Equity securities

276 2,122 2,398

Other

10,233 10,233

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 276 $ 6,061,282 $ 1,434 $ 6,062,992

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ $ 4,590 $ $ 4,590

Collateralized mortgage obligations

223 1,831 2,054

Mortgage-backed securities—federal agencies

44,701 6,454 51,155

Other

13,173 687 13,860

Total trading account securities

$ $ 62,687 $ 8,972 $ 71,659

Mortgage servicing rights

$ $ $ 211,405 $ 211,405

Derivatives

16,959 16,959

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ 276 $ 6,140,928 $ 221,811 $ 6,363,015

Liabilities

Derivatives

$ $ (14,343 ) $ $ (14,343 )

Contingent consideration

(120,380 ) (120,380 )

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ $ (14,343 ) $ (120,380 ) $ (134,723 )

The fair value information included in the following table is not as of period end, but as of the date that the fair value measurement was recorded during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 and excludes nonrecurring fair value measurements of assets no longer held by the Corporation.

Quarter ended March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets

Write-downs

Loans [1]

$ $ $ 30,785 $ 30,785 $ (22,850 )

Loans held-for-sale [2]

1,829 1,829 (296 )

Other real estate owned [3]

18,592 18,592 (3,920 )

Other foreclosed assets [3]

66 66 (11 )

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

$ $ $ 51,272 $ 51,272 $ (27,077 )

[1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were written down to their fair value. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

89


Table of Contents

Quarter ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets

Write-downs

Loans [1]

$ $ $ 132,007 $ 132,007 $ (26,817 )

Other real estate owned [3]

6,098 30,304 36,402 (17,936 )

Other foreclosed assets [3]

20 131 151 (608 )

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

$ $ 6,118 $ 162,442 $ 168,560 $ (45,361 )

[1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35.Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were written down to their fair value. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Quarter ended March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

MBS
classified
as investment
securities
available-
for-sale
CMOs
classified
as trading
account
securities
MBS
classified as
trading account
securities
Other
securities
classified
as trading
account
securities
Mortgage
servicing
rights
Total
assets
Contingent
consideration
Total
liabilities

Balance at January 1, 2016

$ 1,434 $ 1,831 $ 6,454 $ 687 $ 211,405 $ 221,811 $ (120,380 ) $ (120,380 )

Gains (losses) included in earnings

(2 ) (6 ) 89 (24 ) (8,477 ) (8,420 ) (443 ) (443 )

Gains (losses) included in OCI

15 15

Additions

174 338 2,123 2,635

Sales

(106 ) (1,120 ) (1,226 )

Settlements

(25 ) (110 ) (364 ) (499 )

Balance at March 31, 2016

$ 1,422 $ 1,783 $ 5,397 $ 663 $ 205,051 $ 214,316 $ (120,823 ) $ (120,823 )

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at March 31, 2016

$ $ (3 ) $ 86 $ 11 $ (3,866 ) $ (3,772 ) $ (443 ) $ (443 )

90


Table of Contents
Quarter ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

MBS
classified as
securities
available-
for-sale
CMOs
classified as
trading
account
securities
MBS
classified as
trading
account
securities
Other
securities
classified
as trading
account
securities
Mortgage
servicing
rights
Total
assets
Contingent
consideration
Total
liabilities

Balance at January 1, 2015

$ 1,325 $ 1,375 $ 6,229 $ 1,563 $ 148,694 $ 159,186 $ (133,634 ) $ (133,634 )

Gains (losses) included in earnings

(8 ) (2 ) 16 (19 ) (4,929 ) (4,942 ) 4,164 4,164

Additions

118 130 5,259 5,507

Sales

(44 ) (80 ) (124 )

Settlements

(87 ) (74 ) (161 )

Balance at March 31, 2015

$ 1,435 $ 1,242 $ 6,221 $ 1,544 $ 149,024 $ 159,466 $ (129,470 ) $ (129,470 )

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at March 31, 2015

$ $ (2 ) $ 18 $ 23 $ (684 ) $ (645 ) $ 4,164 $ 4,164

There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous tables are reported in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:

Quarter ended March 31, 2016 Quarter ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Total gains
(losses) included
in earnings
Changes in unrealized
gains (losses) relating
to assets still held at
reporting date
Total gains
(losses) included
in earnings
Changes in unrealized
gains (losses) relating to
assets still held at
reporting date

Interest income

$ (2 ) $ $ (8 ) $

FDIC loss share (expense) income

(443 ) (443 ) 4,164 4,164

Other service fees

(8,477 ) (3,866 ) (4,929 ) (684 )

Trading account (loss) profit

59 94 (5 ) 39

Total

$ (8,863 ) $ (4,215 ) $ (778 ) $ 3,519

The following table includes quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used to derive the fair value of Level 3 instruments, excluding those instruments for which the unobservable inputs were not developed by the Corporation such as prices of prior transactions and/or unadjusted third-party pricing sources.

91


Table of Contents
Fair value
at March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 Valuation technique

Unobservable inputs

Weighted average (range)

CMO’s - trading

$ 1,783 Discounted cash flow model Weighted average life 2.9 years (0.4 - 4.6 years)
Yield 3.8% (1.1% - 4.7%)
Prepayment speed 20.8% (18.0% - 24.1%)

Other - trading

$ 663 Discounted cash flow model Weighted average life 5.4 years
Yield 12.2%
Prepayment speed 10.8%

Mortgage servicing rights

$ 205,051 Discounted cash flow model Prepayment speed 6.4% (0.2% - 12.0%)
Weighted average life 6.6 years (0.1 - 15.8 years)
Discount rate 11.2% (9.5% - 15.0%)

Contingent consideration

$ (120,188 ) Discounted cash flow model Credit loss rate on covered loans 2.9% (0.0% - 100.0%)
Risk premium component
of discount rate 6.9%

Loans held-in-portfolio

$ 30,785 [1] External appraisal Haircut applied on
external appraisals 40.0% (39.7% - 40.0%)

Other real estate owned

$ 18,368 [2] External appraisal Haircut applied on
external appraisals 20.1% (10.0% - 40.0%)

[1] Loans held-in-portfolio in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.
[2] Other real estate owned in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s collateralized mortgage obligations and interest-only collateralized mortgage obligation (reported as “other”), which are classified in the “trading” category, are yield, constant prepayment rate, and weighted average life. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the constant prepayment rate will generate a directionally opposite change in the weighted average life. For example, as the average life is reduced by a higher constant prepayment rate, a lower yield will be realized, and when there is a reduction in the constant prepayment rate, the average life of these collateralized mortgage obligations will extend, thus resulting in a higher yield. These particular financial instruments are valued internally by the Corporation’s investment banking and broker-dealer unit utilizing internal valuation techniques. The unobservable inputs incorporated into the internal discounted cash flow models used to derive the fair value of collateralized mortgage obligations and interest-only collateralized mortgage obligation (reported as “other”), which are classified in the “trading” category, are reviewed by the Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit on a quarterly basis. In the case of Level 3 financial instruments which fair value is based on broker quotes, the Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit reviews the inputs used by the broker-dealers for reasonableness utilizing information available from other published sources and validates that the fair value measurements were developed in accordance with ASC Topic 820. The Corporate Treasury unit also substantiates the inputs used by validating the prices with other broker-dealers, whenever possible.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights are constant prepayment rates and discount rates. Increases in interest rates may result in lower prepayments. Discount rates vary according to products and / or portfolios depending on the perceived risk. Increases in discount rates result in a lower fair value measurement. The Corporation’s Corporate Comptroller’s unit is responsible for determining the fair value of MSRs, which is based on discounted cash flow methods based on assumptions developed by an external service provider, except for prepayment speeds, which are adjusted internally for the local market based on historical experience. The Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit validates the economic assumptions developed by the external service provider on a quarterly basis. In addition, an analytical review of prepayment speeds is performed quarterly by the Corporate Comptroller’s unit. The Corporation’s MSR Committee analyzes changes in fair value measurements of MSRs and approves the valuation assumptions at each reporting period. Changes in valuation assumptions must also be approved by the MSR Committee. The fair value of MSRs are compared with those of the external service provider on a quarterly basis in order to validate if the fair values are within the materiality thresholds established by management to monitor and investigate material deviations. Back-testing is performed to compare projected cash flows with actual historical data to ascertain the reasonability of the projected net cash flow results.

92


Table of Contents

Note 27 – Fair value of financial instruments

The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an assets or obligations could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as management’s best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.

The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing rate environment at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, as applicable. In different interest rate environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate the value of the Corporation’s fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is, they do not represent the Corporation’s value as a going concern.

The following tables present the carrying amount, or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values of financial instruments with their corresponding level in the fair value hierarchy. The aggregate fair value amounts of the financial instruments disclosed do not represent management’s estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation.

March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

Carrying
amount
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Financial Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 409,623 $ 409,623 $ $ $ 409,623

Money market investments

1,917,460 1,808,513 108,947 1,917,460

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives [1]

71,284 63,441 7,843 71,284

Investment securities available-for-sale [1]

6,649,830 285 6,648,123 1,422 6,649,830

Investment securities held-to-maturity:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ 97,130 $ $ $ 78,849 $ 78,849

Collateralized mortgage obligation-federal agency

86 91 91

Other

2,000 1,736 238 1,974

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 99,216 $ $ 1,736 $ 79,178 $ 80,914

Other investment securities:

FHLB stock

$ 55,817 $ $ 55,817 $ $ 55,817

FRB stock

93,086 93,086 93,086

Trust preferred securities

13,198 13,198 13,198

Other investments

1,923 5,010 5,010

Total other investment securities

$ 164,024 $ $ 162,101 $ 5,010 $ 167,111

Loans held-for-sale

$ 125,315 $ $ $ 126,872 $ 126,872

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC

21,999,310 20,633,219 20,633,219

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

595,085 553,280 553,280

FDIC loss share asset

219,448 235,943 235,943

Mortgage servicing rights

205,051 205,051 205,051

Derivatives

15,012 15,012 15,012

93


Table of Contents
March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

Carrying
amount
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Financial Liabilities:

Deposits:

Demand deposits

$ 19,648,830 $ $ 19,648,830 $ $ 19,648,830

Time deposits

7,877,763 7,855,406 7,855,406

Total deposits

$ 27,526,593 $ $ 27,504,236 $ $ 27,504,236

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 760,154 $ $ 762,053 $ $ 762,053

Other short-term borrowings [2]

$ 6,370 $ $ 6,370 $ $ 6,370

Notes payable:

FHLB advances

$ 682,161 $ $ 708,394 $ $ 708,394

Unsecured senior debt securities

443,225 421,463 421,463

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities)

439,303 351,345 351,345

Others

18,779 18,779 18,779

Total notes payable

$ 1,583,468 $ $ 1,481,202 $ 18,779 $ 1,499,981

Derivatives

$ 12,068 $ $ 12,068 $ $ 12,068

Contingent consideration

$ 120,823 $ $ $ 120,823 $ 120,823

(In thousands) Notional
amount
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Commitments to extend credit

$ 7,532,634 $ $ $ 518 $ 518

Letters of credit

37,812 767 767

94


Table of Contents
December 31, 2015
Carrying

(In thousands)

amount Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Financial Assets :

Cash and due from banks

$ 363,674 $ 363,674 $ $ $ 363,674

Money market investments

2,180,092 2,083,839 96,253 2,180,092

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives [1]

71,659 62,687 8,972 71,659

Investment securities available-for-sale [1]

6,062,992 276 6,061,282 1,434 6,062,992

Investment securities held-to-maturity:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

98,817 80,815 80,815

Collateralized mortgage obligation-federal agency

86 91 91

Other

2,000 1,740 243 1,983

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 100,903 $ $ 1,740 $ 81,149 $ 82,889

Other investment securities:

FHLB stock

$ 59,387 $ $ 59,387 $ $ 59,387

FRB stock

97,740 97,740 97,740

Trust preferred securities

13,198 13,198 13,198

Other investments

1,923 4,966 4,966

Total other investment securities

$ 172,248 $ $ 170,325 $ 4,966 $ 175,291

Loans held-for-sale

$ 137,000 $ $ 1,364 $ 138,031 $ 139,395

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC

21,843,180 20,849,150 20,849,150

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

611,939 593,002 593,002

FDIC loss share asset

310,221 313,224 313,224

Mortgage servicing rights

211,405 211,405 211,405

Derivatives

16,959 16,959 16,959
December 31, 2015
Carrying

(In thousands)

amount Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Financial Liabilities :

Deposits:

Demand deposits

$ 19,044,355 $ $ 19,044,355 $ $ 19,044,355

Time deposits

8,165,368 8,134,029 8,134,029

Total deposits

$ 27,209,723 $ $ 27,178,384 $ $ 27,178,384

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 762,145 $ $ 764,599 $ $ 764,599

Other short-term borrowings [2]

$ 1,200 $ $ 1,200 $ $ 1,200

Notes payable:

FHLB advances

761,501 780,411 780,411

Unsecured senior debt

442,704 435,186 435,186

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities)

439,295 352,673 352,673

Others

19,008 19,008 19,008

Total notes payable

$ 1,662,508 $ $ 1,568,270 $ 19,008 $ 1,587,278

Derivatives

$ 14,343 $ $ 14,343 $ $ 14,343

Contingent consideration

$ 120,380 $ $ $ 120,380 $ 120,380

95


Table of Contents

(In thousands)

Notional
amount
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair value

Commitments to extend credit

$ 7,434,108 $ $ $ 1,080 $ 1,080

Letters of credit

51,710 572 572

[1] Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements for the fair value by class of financial asset and its hierarchy level.
[2] Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of short-term borrowings.

Following is a description of the Corporation’s valuation methodologies and inputs used to estimate the fair values for each class of financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value, but for which the fair value is disclosed.

Cash and due from banks

Cash and due from banks include cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, and non-interest bearing deposits due from other financial institutions. The carrying amount of cash and due from banks is a reasonable estimate of its fair value. Cash and due from banks are classified as Level 1.

Money market investments

Investments in money market instruments include highly liquid instruments with an average maturity of three months or less. For this reason, they carry a low risk of changes in value as a result of changes in interest rates, and the carrying amount approximates their fair value. Money market investments include federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, and cash balances, including those held at the Federal Reserve. These money market investments are classified as Level 2, except for cash balances which generate interest, including those held at the Federal Reserve, which are classified as Level 1.

Investment securities held-to-maturity

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Municipal bonds include Puerto Rico public municipalities debt and bonds collateralized by second mortgages under the Home Purchase Stimulus Program. Puerto Rico public municipalities debt was valued internally based on benchmark treasury notes and a credit spread derived from comparable Puerto Rico government trades and recent issuances. Puerto Rico public municipalities debt is classified as Level 3. Given that the fair value of municipal bonds collateralized by second mortgages was based on internal yield and prepayment speed assumptions, these municipal bonds are classified as Level 3.

Agency collateralized mortgage obligation: The fair value of the agency collateralized mortgage obligation (“CMO”), which is guaranteed by GNMA, was based on internal yield and prepayment speed assumptions. This agency CMO is classified as Level 3.

Other: Other securities include foreign debt and a private non-profit institution security. Given that the fair value was based on quoted prices for similar instruments, foreign debt is classified as Level 2. Since the fair value of the private non-profit institution security was internally derived using a price/yield methodology, in which the spread was defined based on the obligor risk rating and the corresponding transfer price, this security is classified as Level 3.

Other investment securities

Federal Home Loan Bank capital stock: Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) capital stock represents an equity interest in the FHLB of New York. It does not have a readily determinable fair value because its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. Since the excess stock is repurchased by the FHLB at its par value, the carrying amount of FHLB capital stock approximates fair value. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 2.

96


Table of Contents
Federal Reserve Bank capital stock: Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) capital stock represents an equity interest in the FRB of New York. It does not have a readily determinable fair value because its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. Since the canceled stock is repurchased by the FRB for the amount of the cash subscription paid, the carrying amount of FRB capital stock approximates fair value. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 2.

Trust preferred securities: These securities represent the equity-method investment in the common stock of these trusts. Book value is the same as fair value for these securities since the fair value of the junior subordinated debentures is the same amount as the fair value of the trust preferred securities issued to the public. The equity-method investment in the common stock of these trusts is classified as Level 2.

Other investments: Other investments include private equity method investments and Visa Class B common stock held by the Corporation. Since there are no observable market values, private equity method investments are classified as Level 3. The Visa Class B common stock was priced by applying the quoted price of Visa Class A common stock, net of a liquidity adjustment, to the as converted number of Class A common shares since these Class B common shares are restricted and not convertible to Class A common shares until pending litigation is resolved. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 3.

Loans held-for-sale

For loans held-for-sale originated with the intent to sell in the secondary market, its fair value was determined using similar characteristics of loans and secondary market prices assuming the conversion to mortgage-backed securities. Given that the valuation methodology uses internal assumptions based on loan level data, these loans are classified as Level 3. The fair value of certain other loans held-for-sale is based on bids received from potential buyers; binding offers; or external appraisals, net of internal adjustments and estimated costs to sell. Loans held-for-sale based on binding offers are classified as Level 2. Loans held-for-sale based on indicative offers and/or external appraisals are classified as Level 3.

Loans held-in-portfolio

The fair values of the loans held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential mortgage, consumer, and credit cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan characteristics, including interest rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, fair values were estimated based on an exit price by discounting expected cash flows for the segmented groups of loans using a discount rate that considers interest, credit and expected return by market participant under current market conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery assumptions have been applied in the mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore it is included in the loans total at its carrying amount. Loans held-in-portfolio are classified as Level 3.

FDIC loss share asset

Fair value of the FDIC loss share asset was estimated using projected net losses related to the loss sharing agreements, which are expected to be reimbursed by the FDIC. The projected net losses were discounted using the U.S. Government agency curve. The loss share asset is classified as Level 3.

Deposits

Demand deposits: The fair value of demand deposits, which have no stated maturity, was calculated based on the amount payable on demand as of the respective dates. These demand deposits include non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts. Thus, these deposits are classified as Level 2.

Time deposits: The fair value of time deposits was calculated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on time deposits with similar maturities. The non-performance risk was determined using internally-developed models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts insured, the remaining term, and the credit premium of the institution. For certain 5-year certificates of deposit in which customers may withdraw their money anytime with no penalties or charges, the fair value of these certificates of deposit incorporate an early cancellation estimate based on historical experience. Time deposits are classified as Level 2.

97


Table of Contents

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with short-term maturities approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of those instruments. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities were valued using discounted cash flows based on the three-month LIBOR. In determining the non-performance credit risk valuation adjustment, the collateralization levels of these long-term securities sold under agreements to repurchase were considered. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are classified as Level 2.

Other short-term borrowings

The carrying amount of other short-term borrowings approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Thus, these other short-term borrowings are classified as Level 2.

Notes payable

FHLB advances: The fair value of FHLB advances was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows over their contractual term. In determining the non-performance credit risk valuation adjustment, the collateralization levels of these advances were considered. These advances are classified as Level 2.

Unsecured senior debt securities: The fair value of publicly-traded unsecured senior debt securities was determined using recent trades of similar transactions. Publicly-traded unsecured senior debt securities are classified as Level 2.

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities): The fair value of junior subordinated interest debentures was determined using recent trades of similar transactions. Thus, these junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures are classified as Level 2.

Others: The other category includes capital lease obligations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of capital lease obligations, therefore; it is included at its carrying amount. Capital lease obligations are classified as Level 3.

Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit

Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. Since the fair value of commitments to extend credit varies depending on the undrawn amount of the credit facility, fees are subject to constant change, and cash flows are dependent on the creditworthiness of borrowers, commitments to extend credit are classified as Level 3. The fair value of letters of credit was based on fees currently charged on similar agreements. Given that the fair value of letters of credit constantly vary due to fees being subject to constant change and whether the fees are received depends on the creditworthiness of the account parties, letters of credit are classified as Level 3.

98


Table of Contents

Note 28 – Net income per common share

The following table sets forth the computation of net income per common share (“EPS”), basic and diluted, for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands, except per share information)

2016 2015

Net income from continuing operations

$ 84,999 $ 73,485

Net income from discontinued operations

1,341

Preferred stock dividends

(931 ) (930 )

Net income applicable to common stock

$ 84,068 $ 73,896

Average common shares outstanding

103,188,815 102,939,928

Average potential dilutive common shares

80,998 196,381

Average common shares outstanding—assuming dilution

103,269,813 103,136,309

Basic EPS from continuing operations

$ 0.81 $ 0.71

Basic EPS from discontinued operations

$ $ 0.01

Total Basic EPS

$ 0.81 $ 0.72

Diluted EPS from continuing operations

$ 0.81 $ 0.71

Diluted EPS from discontinued operations

$ $ 0.01

Total Diluted EPS

$ 0.81 $ 0.72

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Corporation calculated the impact of potential dilutive common shares under the treasury method, consistent with the method used for the preparation of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. For a discussion of the calculation under the treasury stock method, refer to Note 37 of the consolidated financial statements included in the 2015 Form 10-K.

For the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no stock options outstanding.

99


Table of Contents

Note 29 – Other service fees

The caption of other services fees in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following major categories:

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Insurance fees

$ 12,850 $ 12,041

Credit card fees

16,858 16,149

Debit card fees

11,287 11,125

Sale and administration of investment products

4,839 5,930

Trust fees

4,235 4,602

Other fees

3,313 3,779

Total other service fees

$ 53,382 $ 53,626

100


Table of Contents

Note 30 – FDIC loss share (expense) income

The caption of FDIC loss-share (expense) income in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following major categories:

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

$ (4,042 ) $ (27,316 )

80% mirror accounting on credit impairment losses (reversal) [1]

(2,093 ) 8,246

80% mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses

3,950 21,545

80% mirror accounting on recoveries on covered assets, including rental income on OREOs, subject to reimbursement to the FDIC

(645 ) (2,619 )

Change in true-up payment obligation

(443 ) 4,164

Other

127 119

Total FDIC loss share (expense) income

$ (3,146 ) $ 4,139

[1] Reductions in expected cash flows for ASC 310-30 loans, which may impact the provision for loan losses, may consider reductions in both principal and interest cash flow expectations. The amount covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements for interest not collected from borrowers is limited under the agreements (approximately 90 days); accordingly, these amounts are not subject fully to the 80% mirror accounting.

101


Table of Contents

Note 31 – Pension and postretirement benefits

The Corporation has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan and supplementary pension benefit restoration plans for regular employees of certain of its subsidiaries. The accrual of benefits under the plans is frozen to all participants.

The components of net periodic pension cost for the periods presented were as follows:

Pension Plan Benefit Restoration Plans
Quarters ended March 31, Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015 2016 2015

Interest cost

$ 6,291 $ 7,403 $ 348 $ 407

Expected return on plan assets

(9,623 ) (11,056 ) (538 ) (589 )

Amortization of net loss

4,880 4,465 331 311

Total net periodic pension cost (benefit)

$ 1,548 $ 812 $ 141 $ 129

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Corporation made a contribution to the benefit restoration plans of $43 thousand. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year 2016 for the pension and benefit restoration plans amount to approximately $173 thousand.

The Corporation also provides certain postretirement health care benefits for retired employees of certain subsidiaries. The table that follows presents the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost.

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Service cost

$ 289 $ 368

Interest cost

1,505 1,589

Amortization of prior service cost

(950 ) (950 )

Amortization of net loss

275 249

Total postretirement cost

$ 1,119 $ 1,256

Contributions made to the postretirement benefit plan for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 amounted to approximately $1.6 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year 2016 for the postretirement benefit plan amount to approximately $6.4 million.

102


Table of Contents

Note 32 – Stock-based compensation

The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the “Stock Option Plan”), which permitted the granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporation’s shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which replaced and superseded the Stock Option Plan. The adoption of the Incentive Plan did not alter the original terms of the grants made under the Stock Option Plan prior to the adoption of the Incentive Plan.

Stock Option Plan

Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. This plan provided for the issuance of Popular, Inc.’s common stock at a price equal to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The Corporation’s policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional 20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of employment due to retirement.

As of March 31, 2016 there were no stock options outstanding. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, all stock options outstanding which amounted to 44,797 with a weighted average exercise price of $ 272 expired.

Incentive Plan

The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards, Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board). Employees and directors of the Corporation and/or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan.

Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based on the employees’ continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and 10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service. The vesting schedule for restricted shares granted on or after 2014 was modified as follows, the first part ratably over four years commencing at the date of the grant and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of the earlier of 55 years of age and 10 years of service or 60 years of age and 5 years of service. The four year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after attaining the earlier of 55 years of age and 10 years of service or 60 years of age and 5 years of service. The restricted shares granted consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule vest in two years from grant date.

103


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of management.

(Not in thousands)

Shares Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value

Non-vested at December 31, 2014

628,009 $ 27.13

Granted

323,814 33.37

Vested

(430,646 ) 30.45

Forfeited

(25,446 ) 28.65

Non-vested at December 31, 2015

495,731 $ 28.25

Granted

226,098 24.05

Quantity adjusted by TSR factor

(8,914 ) 28.47

Vested

(256,501 ) 25.90

Non-vested at March 31, 2016

456,414 $ 27.12

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, 161,500 shares of restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, no shares of restricted stock were awarded to management. No shares were awarded consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Beginning in 2015, the Corporation authorized the issuance of performance shares, in addition to restricted shares, under the Incentive Plan. The performance share awards consist of the opportunity to receive shares of Popular, Inc.’s common stock provided that the Corporation achieves certain goals during a three-year performance cycle. The goals will be based on two metrics weighted equally: the Relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) and the Absolute Earnings per Share (“EPS”) goals. The TSR metric is considered to be a market condition under ASC 718. For equity settled awards based on a market condition, the fair value is determined as of the grant date and is not subsequently revised based on actual performance. The EPS performance metric is considered to be a performance condition under ASC 718. The fair value is determined based on the probability of achieving the EPS goal as of each reporting period. The TSR and EPS metrics are equally weighted and work independently. The number of shares that will ultimately vest ranges from 50% to a 150% of target based on both market (TSR) and performance (EPS) conditions. The performance shares vest at the end of the three-year performance cycle. The vesting is accelerated at termination of employment after attaining the earlier of 55 years of age and 10 years of service or 60 years of age and 5 years of service. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, 64,598 performance shares were granted under this plan.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation recognized $ 3.7 million of restricted stock expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $ 0.5 million (March 31, 2015—$ 2.0 million, with a tax benefit of $ 0.3 million). For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the fair market value of the restricted stock vested was $3.6 million at grant date and $3.3 million at vesting date. This triggers a shortfall, of $0.1 million of which $31 thousand was recorded against the windfall pool in additional paid in capital. No additional shortfall was recorded for the remaining $79 thousand due to the valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation recognized $1.0 million of performance shares expense, with a tax benefit of $0.1 million. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards and performance shares to members of management at March 31, 2016 was $ 8.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.

104


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of the Board of Directors:

(Not in thousands)

Restricted Stock Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value

Non-vested at December 31, 2014

$

Granted

22,119 32.29

Vested

(22,119 ) 32.29

Forfeited

Non-vested at December 31, 2015

$

Granted

2,338 23.95

Vested

(2,338 ) 23.95

Forfeited

Non-vested at March 31, 2016

$

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation granted 2,338 shares of restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc., which became vested at grant date (March 31, 2015 – 2,643). During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.1 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of $15 thousand (March 31, 2015—$0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $16 thousand). The fair value at vesting date of the restricted stock vested during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 for directors was $ 56 thousand.

105


Table of Contents

Note 33 – Income taxes

The reason for the difference between the income tax expense applicable to income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico, were as follows:

Quarters ended
March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Amount % of pre-tax
income
Amount % of pre-tax
income

Computed income tax expense at statutory rates

$ 45,733 39 % $ 41,361 39 %

Net benefit of tax exempt interest income

(15,584 ) (13 ) (15,027 ) (14 )

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

5,273 5 5,639 5

Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions

(864 ) (1 ) (275 )

Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate

(3,414 ) (3 ) (2,471 ) (2 )

State and local taxes

2,927 3 1,331 1

Others

(1,806 ) (2 ) 2,010 2

Income tax expense

$ 32,265 28 % $ 32,568 31 %

The following table presents a breakdown of the significant components of the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities.

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Deferred tax assets:

Tax credits available for carryforward

$ 13,651 $ 13,651

Net operating loss and other carryforward available

1,264,077 1,262,197

Postretirement and pension benefits

114,866 116,036

Deferred loan origination fees

6,063 6,420

Allowance for loan losses

658,220 670,592

Deferred gains

5,688 5,966

Accelerated depreciation

8,209 8,335

Intercompany deferred gains

2,492 2,743

Difference in outside basis from pass-through entities

11,889 12,684

Other temporary differences

30,348 29,208

Total gross deferred tax assets

2,115,503 2,127,832

Deferred tax liabilities:

FDIC-assisted transaction

92,156 90,778

Indefinite-lived intangibles

66,175 63,573

Unrealized net gain on trading and available-for-sale securities

37,662 22,281

Other temporary differences

7,232 6,670

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

203,225 183,302

Valuation allowance

637,911 642,727

Net deferred tax asset

$ 1,274,367 $ 1,301,803

The net deferred tax asset shown in the table above at March 31, 2016 is reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition as $1.3 billion in net deferred tax assets in the “Other assets” caption (December 31, 2015—$1.3 billion) and $649 thousand in deferred tax liabilities in the “Other liabilities” caption (December 31, 2015—$649 thousand), reflecting the aggregate deferred tax assets or liabilities of individual tax-paying subsidiaries of the Corporation.

A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The

106


Table of Contents

determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The analysis considers all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, after weighting all positive and negative evidence, the Corporation concluded that it is more likely than not that a portion of the total deferred tax asset from the U.S. operations, amounting to $1.2 billion and comprised mainly of net operating losses, will be realized. The Corporation based this determination on its estimated earnings for the remaining carryforward period of eighteen years beginning with the 2016 fiscal year, available to utilize the deferred tax asset, to reduce its income tax obligations. The recent historical level of book income adjusted by permanent differences, together with the estimated earnings after the reorganization of the U.S. operations and additional estimated earnings from the Doral Bank Transaction were objective positive evidence considered by the Corporation. As of March 31, 2016 the U.S. operations are not in a three year cumulative loss position, taking into account taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences. All of these factors lead management to conclude that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset from its U.S. operations will be realized. Management will continue to evaluate the realization of the deferred tax asset each quarter and adjust as deemed necessary. At March 31, 2016 a valuation allowance is recorded on the deferred tax asset of the U.S. operation in the amount of $602 million.

At March 31, 2016, the Corporation’s net deferred tax assets related to its Puerto Rico operations amounted to $730 million.

The Corporation’s Puerto Rico Banking operation is not in a cumulative three year loss position, taking into account taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences, and has sustained profitability for the three year period ended March 31, 2016. This is considered a strong piece of objectively verifiable positive evidence that outweights any negative evidence considered by management in the evaluation of the realization of the deferred tax asset. Based on this evidence and management’s estimate of future taxable income, the Corporation has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico Banking operations will be realized.

The Holding Company operation is not in a cumulative loss taking into account taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences, for the three year period ended March 31, 2016. However, it has sustained losses for year ended December 31, 2015 and the period ended March 31, 2016. Management expect these losses will be a trend in early future years. The losses in recent periods together with the expected losses in future years is considered by management a strong negative evidence that will suggest that income in future years will be insufficient to support the realization of all deferred tax asset. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Holding Company will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance is recorded on the deferred tax asset at the Holding Company, which amounted to $36 million as of March 31, 2016.

The reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:

(In millions)

2016 2015

Balance at January 1

$ 9.0 $ 8.0

Additions for tax positions - January through March

0.4 0.3

Reduction as a result of settlements - January through March

(0.5 )

Balance at March 31

$ 9.4 $ 7.8

At March 31, 2016, the total amount of interest recognized in the statement of financial condition approximated $3.7 million (December 31, 2015—$3.2 million). The total interest expense recognized at March 31, 2016 was $485 thousand (December 31, 2015—$57 thousand). Management determined that at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 there was no need to accrue for the payment of penalties. The Corporation’s policy is to report interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, whiles the penalties, if any, are reported in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

107


Table of Contents

After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico, that if recognized, would affect the Corporation’s effective tax rate, was approximately $12.0 million at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$11.2 million).

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statutes of limitation, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.

The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. At March 31, 2016, the following years remain subject to examination in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction: 2012 and thereafter; and in the Puerto Rico jurisdiction, 2010 and thereafter. The Corporation anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, which could amount to approximately $3.3 million.

108


Table of Contents

Note 34 – Supplemental disclosure on the consolidated statements of cash flows

Additional disclosures on cash flow information and non-cash activities for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 are listed in the following table:

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015

Non-cash activities:

Loans transferred to other real estate

$ 26,919 $ 30,802

Loans transferred to other property

7,693 8,979

Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets

34,612 39,781

Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale

10,839

Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans held-in-portfolio

3,821 4,858

Loans securitized into investment securities [1]

170,248 203,414

Trades receivable from brokers and counterparties

87,590 112,287

Trades payable to brokers and counterparties

32,774 19,097

Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on securitizations or asset transfers

2,136 2,859

[1] Includes loans securitized into trading securities and subsequently sold before quarter end.

As previously disclosed in Note 5, Business Combination, on February 27, 2015, the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, BPPR, in an alliance with co-bidders, including the Corporation’s U.S. mainland banking subsidiary, BPNA, acquired certain assets and all deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the FDIC as receiver. As part of this transaction, BPPR received during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 net cash proceeds of approximately $ 711 million for consideration of the assets and liabilities acquired.

109


Table of Contents

Note 35 – Segment reporting

The Corporation’s corporate structure consists of two reportable segments – Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. These reportable segments pertain only to the continuing operations of Popular, Inc. As previously indicated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida were classified as discontinued operations and sold during 2014.

Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on the products and services offered by the segments.

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:

Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporation’s results of operations and total assets at March 31, 2016, additional disclosures are provided for the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:

Commercial banking represents the Corporation’s banking operations conducted at BPPR, which are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR.

Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally on residential mortgage loan originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR.

Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries generate profits based on fee income.

Banco Popular North America:

Banco Popular North America’s reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA, E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. BPNA operates through a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland under the name of Popular Community Bank, while E-LOAN supports BPNA’s deposit gathering through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during 2008. During the third quarter of 2015, BPNA and E-LOAN completed an asset purchase and sale transaction in which E-LOAN sold to BPNA all of its outstanding loan portfolio, including residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit, which had a carrying value of approximately $213 million. Prior to this transaction, the Corporation provided additional disclosures for the BPNA reportable segment related to E-LOAN. After the close of the above mentioned asset purchase and sale transaction, additional disclosures with respect to E-LOAN are no longer considered relevant to the financial statements and accordingly are not presented. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. also holds a running-off loan portfolio as this subsidiary ceased originating loans during 2009. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment and insurance services across the BPNA branch network.

The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North America, Popular International Bank and certain of the Corporation’s investments accounted for under the equity method, including EVERTEC and Centro Financiero BHD, S.A. The Corporate group also includes the expenses of certain corporate areas that are identified as critical to the organization: Finance, Risk Management and Legal.

The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates, resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.

110


Table of Contents

The tables that follow present the results of operations and total assets by reportable segments:

2016

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

Banco Popular Banco Popular Intersegment

(In thousands)

de Puerto Rico North America Eliminations

Net interest income

$ 305,350 $ 62,257 $

Provision for loan losses

40,800 4,069

Non-interest income

98,566 4,950

Amortization of intangibles

2,948 166

Depreciation expense

10,197 1,333

Other operating expenses

224,669 41,331

Income tax expense

31,877 8,456

Net income

$ 93,425 $ 11,852 $

Segment assets

$ 28,108,702 $ 7,880,357 $ (52,740 )

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

Reportable
Segments
Corporate Eliminations Total Popular, Inc.

Net interest income (expense)

$ 367,607 $ (15,195 ) $ $ 352,412

Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses

44,869 (34 ) 44,835

Non-interest income

103,516 8,177 (63 ) 111,630

Amortization of intangibles

3,114 3,114

Depreciation expense

11,530 177 11,707

Other operating expenses

266,000 21,731 (609 ) 287,122

Income tax expense (benefit)

40,333 (8,281 ) 213 32,265

Net income (loss)

$ 105,277 $ (20,611 ) $ 333 $ 84,999

Segment assets

$ 35,936,319 $ 4,938,750 $ (4,728,060 ) $ 36,147,009

111


Table of Contents

2015

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Banco Popular Banco Popular Intersegment

(In thousands)

de Puerto Rico North America Eliminations

Net interest income

$ 306,611 $ 52,101 $

Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses

42,237 (2,202 )

Non-interest income

103,529 6,167

Amortization of intangibles

1,998 106

Depreciation expense

10,108 1,617

Other operating expenses

227,576 54,484

Income tax expense

37,448 937

Net income

$ 90,773 $ 3,326 $

Segment assets

$ 28,803,521 $ 6,717,758 $ (128,481 )

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Reportable

(In thousands)

Segments Corporate Eliminations Total Popular, Inc.

Net interest income (expense)

$ 358,712 $ (15,517 ) $ $ 343,195

Provision for loan losses

40,035 40,035

Non-interest income

109,696 5,643 (104 ) 115,235

Amortization of intangibles

2,104 2,104

Depreciation expense

11,725 194 11,919

Other operating expenses

282,061 16,990 (732 ) 298,319

Income tax expense (benefit)

38,385 (6,062 ) 245 32,568

Net income (loss)

$ 94,098 $ (20,996 ) $ 383 $ 73,485

Segment assets

$ 35,392,798 $ 4,896,192 $ (4,673,543 ) $ 35,615,447

Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment are as follows:

2016

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

Consumer Other Total Banco
Commercial and Retail Financial Popular de

(In thousands)

Banking Banking Services Eliminations Puerto Rico

Net interest income

$ 114,903 $ 187,195 $ 1,615 $ 1,637 $ 305,350

Provision for loan losses

14,908 25,892 40,800

Non-interest income

21,731 55,608 21,311 (84 ) 98,566

Amortization of intangibles

22 1,836 1,090 2,948

Depreciation expense

4,275 5,691 231 10,197

Other operating expenses

57,232 150,212 17,309 (84 ) 224,669

Income tax expense

18,169 12,379 1,329 31,877

Net income

$ 42,028 $ 46,793 $ 2,967 $ 1,637 $ 93,425

Segment assets

$ 11,273,486 $ 17,090,030 $ 342,867 $ (597,681 ) $ 28,108,702

112


Table of Contents

2015

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

Consumer Other Total Banco
Commercial and Retail Financial Popular de

(In thousands)

Banking Banking Services Eliminations Puerto Rico

Net interest income

$ 118,475 $ 186,252 $ 1,880 $ 4 $ 306,611

(Reversal of provision) provision for loan losses

(3,556 ) 45,793 42,237

Non-interest income

27,150 56,004 20,470 (95 ) 103,529

Amortization of intangibles

29 1,772 197 1,998

Depreciation expense

4,320 5,512 276 10,108

Other operating expenses

65,856 145,068 16,747 (95 ) 227,576

Income tax expense

26,053 9,778 1,617 37,448

Net income

$ 52,923 $ 34,333 $ 3,513 $ 4 $ 90,773

Segment assets

$ 10,056,505 $ 20,053,145 $ 486,998 $ (1,793,127 ) $ 28,803,521

Geographic Information

Quarter ended

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015

Revenues: [1]

Puerto Rico

$ 380,036 $ 385,054

United States

64,640 56,710

Other

19,366 16,666

Total consolidated revenues

$ 464,042 $ 458,430

[1] Total revenues include net interest income (expense), service charges on deposit accounts, other service fees, mortgage banking activities, net gain (loss) and valuation adjustments on investment securities, trading account (loss) profit, net (loss) gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans sold, FDIC loss share (expense) income and other operating income.

Selected Balance Sheet Information:

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Puerto Rico

Total assets

$ 27,150,601 $ 26,764,184

Loans

17,370,172 17,477,070

Deposits

21,015,800 20,893,232

United States

Total assets

$ 8,063,912 $ 7,859,217

Loans

5,121,648 4,873,504

Deposits

5,445,760 5,288,886

Other

Total assets

$ 932,496 $ 1,138,332

Loans

766,362 778,656

Deposits [1]

1,065,033 1,027,605

[1] Represents deposits from BPPR operations located in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands.

113


Table of Contents

Note 36 – Condensed consolidating financial information of guarantor and issuers of registered guaranteed securities

The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position of Popular, Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) (parent only), Popular North America, Inc. (“PNA”) and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation at March 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and cash flows for periods ended March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

PNA is an operating, wholly-owned subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Equity One, Inc. and Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including BPNA’s wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc.

PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA.

114


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Condition (Unaudited)

At March 31, 2016
All other
Popular Inc. PNA subsidiaries and Elimination Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Holding Co. Holding Co. eliminations entries Consolidated

Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 21,133 $ 598 $ 409,315 $ (21,423 ) $ 409,623

Money market investments

255,251 18,519 1,917,209 (273,519 ) 1,917,460

Trading account securities, at fair value

2,121 69,163 71,284

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

227 6,649,603 6,649,830

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost

99,216 99,216

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value

9,850 4,492 149,682 164,024

Investment in subsidiaries

5,679,385 1,819,384 (7,498,769 )

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

125,315 125,315

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

1,167 22,617,321 22,618,488

Loans covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

625,130 625,130

Less—Unearned income

110,751 110,751

Allowance for loan losses

2 538,470 538,472

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

1,165 22,593,230 22,594,395

FDIC loss-share asset

219,448 219,448

Premises and equipment, net

2,999 524,494 527,493

Other real estate not covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

566 165,394 165,960

Other real estate covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

36,397 36,397

Accrued income receivable

73 36 120,229 (30 ) 120,308

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

205,051 205,051

Other assets

57,670 23,453 2,091,857 (16,950 ) 2,156,030

Goodwill

631,095 631,095

Other intangible assets

553 53,527 54,080

Total assets

$ 6,030,993 $ 1,866,482 $ 36,060,225 $ (7,810,691 ) $ 36,147,009

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing

$ $ $ 6,405,516 $ (21,423 ) $ 6,384,093

Interest bearing

21,416,019 (273,519 ) 21,142,500

Total deposits

27,821,535 (294,942 ) 27,526,593

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

760,154 760,154

Other short-term borrowings

6,370 6,370

Notes payable

734,036 148,492 700,940 1,583,468

Other liabilities

46,657 3,591 985,598 (17,537 ) 1,018,309

Liabilities from discontinued operations

1,815 1,815

Total liabilities

780,693 152,083 30,276,412 (312,479 ) 30,896,709

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock

50,160 50,160

Common stock

1,039 2 56,307 (56,309 ) 1,039

Surplus

4,222,706 4,111,208 5,712,604 (9,815,285 ) 4,231,233

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

1,165,003 (2,409,905 ) 195,181 2,206,197 1,156,476

Treasury stock, at cost

(6,858 ) (6,858 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

(181,750 ) 13,094 (180,279 ) 167,185 (181,750 )

Total stockholders’ equity

5,250,300 1,714,399 5,783,813 (7,498,212 ) 5,250,300

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 6,030,993 $ 1,866,482 $ 36,060,225 $ (7,810,691 ) $ 36,147,009

115


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Condition (Unaudited)

At December 31, 2015
All other
Popular, Inc. PNA subsidiaries and Elimination Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Holding Co. Holding Co. eliminations entries Consolidated

Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$ 24,298 $ 600 $ 363,620 $ (24,844 ) $ 363,674

Money market investments

262,204 23,931 2,179,887 (285,930 ) 2,180,092

Trading account securities, at fair value

2,020 69,639 71,659

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

216 6,062,776 6,062,992

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost

100,903 100,903

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value

9,850 4,492 157,906 172,248

Investment in subsidiaries

5,539,325 1,789,512 (7,328,837 )

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

137,000 137,000

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

1,176 22,452,637 22,453,813

Loans covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

646,115 646,115

Less—Unearned income

107,698 107,698

Allowance for loan losses

3 537,108 537,111

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

1,173 22,453,946 22,455,119

FDIC loss-share asset

310,221 310,221

Premises and equipment, net

2,823 499,788 502,611

Other real estate not covered under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC

532 154,699 155,231

Other real estate covered under loss- sharing agreements with the FDIC

36,685 36,685

Accrued income receivable

85 115 124,070 (36 ) 124,234

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

211,405 211,405

Other assets

54,908 23,596 2,132,616 (17,958 ) 2,193,162

Goodwill

626,388 626,388

Other intangible assets

554 57,555 58,109

Total assets

$ 5,897,988 $ 1,842,246 $ 35,679,104 $ (7,657,605 ) $ 35,761,733

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing

$ $ $ 6,426,359 $ (24,844 ) $ 6,401,515

Interest bearing

21,094,138 (285,930 ) 20,808,208

Total deposits

27,520,497 (310,774 ) 27,209,723

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

762,145 762,145

Other short-term borrowings

1,200 1,200

Notes payable

733,516 148,483 780,509 1,662,508

Other liabilities

59,148 6,659 971,429 (18,218 ) 1,019,018

Liabilities from discontinued operations

1,815 1,815

Total liabilities

792,664 155,142 30,037,595 (328,992 ) 30,656,409

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock

50,160 50,160

Common stock

1,038 2 56,307 (56,309 ) 1,038

Surplus

4,220,629 4,111,208 5,712,635 (9,815,316 ) 4,229,156

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

1,096,484 (2,416,251 ) 128,459 2,279,265 1,087,957

Treasury stock, at cost

(6,101 ) (6,101 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

(256,886 ) (7,855 ) (255,892 ) 263,747 (256,886 )

Total stockholders’ equity

5,105,324 1,687,104 5,641,509 (7,328,613 ) 5,105,324

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 5,897,988 $ 1,842,246 $ 35,679,104 $ (7,657,605 ) $ 35,761,733

116


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (Unaudited)

Quarter ended March 31, 2016
All other
Popular, Inc. PNA subsidiaries and Elimination Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Holding Co. Holding Co. eliminations entries Consolidated

Interest and dividend income:

Dividend income from subsidiaries

$ 29,700 $ $ $ (29,700 ) $

Loans

19 363,178 363,197

Money market investments

255 21 2,863 (276 ) 2,863

Investment securities

238 80 35,953 36,271

Trading account securities

1,689 1,689

Total interest and dividend income

30,212 101 403,683 (29,976 ) 404,020

Interest expense:

Deposits

30,150 (276 ) 29,874

Short-term borrowings

1,861 1,861

Long-term debt

13,117 2,693 4,063 19,873

Total interest expense

13,117 2,693 36,074 (276 ) 51,608

Net interest income (expense)

17,095 (2,592 ) 367,609 (29,700 ) 352,412

Provision (reversal) for loan losses- non-covered loans

(34 ) 47,974 47,940

Provision (reversal) for loan losses- covered loans

(3,105 ) (3,105 )

Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses

17,129 (2,592 ) 322,740 (29,700 ) 307,577

Service charges on deposit accounts

39,862 39,862

Other service fees

53,439 (57 ) 53,382

Mortgage banking activities

10,551 10,551

Trading account profit (loss)

24 (186 ) (162 )

Net loss on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

(304 ) (304 )

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

(4,098 ) (4,098 )

FDIC loss-share expense

(3,146 ) (3,146 )

Other operating income

3,256 (1,303 ) 13,599 (7 ) 15,545

Total non-interest income

3,280 (1,303 ) 109,717 (64 ) 111,630

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

15,421 111,670 127,091

Net occupancy expenses

916 19,514 20,430

Equipment expenses

445 14,103 14,548

Other taxes

47 10,148 10,195

Professional fees

2,881 30 72,605 (57 ) 75,459

Communications

137 6,183 6,320

Business promotion

465 10,645 11,110

FDIC deposit insurance

7,370 7,370

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

9,141 9,141

Other operating expenses

(20,428 ) 39 38,106 (552 ) 17,165

Amortization of intangibles

3,114 3,114

Total operating expenses

(116 ) 69 302,599 (609 ) 301,943

Income (loss) before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries

20,525 (3,964 ) 129,858 (29,155 ) 117,264

Income tax expense (benefit)

3 (1,387 ) 33,436 213 32,265

Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

20,522 (2,577 ) 96,422 (29,368 ) 84,999

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

64,477 8,923 (73,400 )

Net Income

$ 84,999 $ 6,346 $ 96,422 $ (102,768 ) $ 84,999

Comprehensive income, net of tax

$ 160,135 $ 27,295 $ 172,035 $ (199,330 ) $ 160,135

117


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (Unaudited)

Quarter ended March 31, 2015
All other
Popular, Inc. PNA subsidiaries and Elimination Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Holding Co. Holding Co. eliminations entries Consolidated

Interest income:

Dividend income from subsidiaries

$ 1,500 $ $ $ (1,500 ) $

Loans

140 355,613 (122 ) 355,631

Money market investments

2 2 1,444 (2 ) 1,446

Investment securities

143 81 30,077 30,301

Trading account securities

2,696 2,696

Total interest income

1,785 83 389,830 (1,624 ) 390,074

Interest expense:

Deposits

25,866 (2 ) 25,864

Short-term borrowings

101 1,755 (122 ) 1,734

Long-term debt

13,118 2,695 3,468 19,281

Total interest expense

13,118 2,796 31,089 (124 ) 46,879

Net interest (expense) income

(11,333 ) (2,713 ) 358,741 (1,500 ) 343,195

Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans

29,711 29,711

Provision for loan losses- covered loans

10,324 10,324

Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses

(11,333 ) (2,713 ) 318,706 (1,500 ) 303,160

Service charges on deposit accounts

39,017 39,017

Other service fees

53,714 (88 ) 53,626

Mortgage banking activities

12,852 12,852

Trading account profit

40 374 414

Net loss on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

(79 ) (79 )

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

(4,526 ) (4,526 )

FDIC loss-share income

4,139 4,139

Other operating income

2,968 (828 ) 7,668 (16 ) 9,792

Total non-interest income

3,008 (828 ) 113,159 (104 ) 115,235

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

11,908 104,550 116,458

Net occupancy expenses

980 20,729 21,709

Equipment expenses

545 12,866 13,411

Other taxes

(1,458 ) 10,032 8,574

Professional fees

2,774 410 72,432 (88 ) 75,528

Communications

117 6,059 6,176

Business promotion

436 10,377 10,813

FDIC deposit insurance

6,398 6,398

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

23,069 23,069

Other operating expenses

(16,935 ) 109 34,819 (644 ) 17,349

Amortization of intangibles

2,104 2,104

Restructuring cost

10,753 10,753

Total operating expenses

(1,633 ) 519 314,188 (732 ) 312,342

(Loss) income before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries

(6,692 ) (4,060 ) 117,677 (872 ) 106,053

Income tax expense

47 32,276 245 32,568

(Loss) income before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

(6,739 ) (4,060 ) 85,401 (1,117 ) 73,485

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

80,224 1,269 (81,493 )

Income (loss) from continuing operations

73,485 (2,791 ) 85,401 (82,610 ) 73,485

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

1,341 1,341

Equity in undistributed earnings of discontinued operations

1,341 1,341 (2,682 )

Net Income (loss)

$ 74,826 $ (1,450 ) $ 86,742 $ (85,292 ) $ 74,826

Comprehensive income, net of tax

$ 110,298 $ 11,841 $ 122,078 $ (133,919 ) $ 110,298

118


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Quarter ended March 31,2016
All other
Popular, Inc. PNA subsidiaries Elimination Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Holding Co. Holding Co. and eliminations entries Consolidated

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income

$ 84,999 $ 6,346 $ 96,422 $ (102,768 ) $ 84,999

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

(64,477 ) (8,923 ) 73,400

Provision (reversal) for loan losses

(34 ) 44,869 44,835

Amortization of intangibles

3,114 3,114

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

177 11,530 11,707

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

521 8 (11,687 ) (11,158 )

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

8,477 8,477

FDIC loss-share income

3,146 3,146

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

4,098 4,098

(Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method

(3,256 ) 1,303 (5,136 ) (7,089 )

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

3 (1,387 ) 24,389 213 23,218

(Gain) loss on:

Disposition of premises and equipment and other productive assets

(1,946 ) (1,946 )

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held for sale and mortgage banking activities

(7,101 ) (7,101 )

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

2,802 2,802

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

(66,451 ) (66,451 )

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

22,253 22,253

Net originations on loans held-for-sale

(110,528 ) (110,528 )

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

(101 ) 176,699 176,598

Accrued income receivable

12 79 3,842 (7 ) 3,926

Other assets

1 21 22,194 (1,220 ) 20,996

Net (decrease) increase in:

Interest payable

(7,875 ) (2,685 ) (1,708 ) 7 (12,261 )

Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations

1,536 1,536

Other liabilities

(4,622 ) (382 ) (12,681 ) 675 (17,010 )

Total adjustments

(79,651 ) (11,966 ) 111,711 73,068 93,162

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

5,348 (5,620 ) 208,133 (29,700 ) 178,161

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net decrease in money market investments

6,952 5,412 262,679 (12,411 ) 262,632

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

(742,859 ) (742,859 )

Other

(59,786 ) (59,786 )

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

239,399 239,399

Held-to-maturity

2,108 2,108

Other

41,664 41,664

Proceeds from sale of investment securities:

Other

26,346 26,346

Net repayments on loans

8 13,327 13,335

Proceeds from sale of loans

1,128 1,128

Acquisition of loan portfolios

(212,798 ) (212,798 )

Net payments from FDIC under loss-sharing

agreements

88,588 88,588

Return of capital from equity method investments

206 206

Acquisition of premises and equipment

(398 ) (38,421 ) (38,819 )

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment and other productive assets

46 5,046 5,092

Foreclosed assets

14,513 14,513

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

6,608 5,618 (359,066 ) (12,411 ) (359,251 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

302,718 15,832 318,550

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

(1,991 ) (1,991 )

Other short-term borrowings

5,170 5,170

Payments of notes payable

(108,452 ) (108,452 )

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

28,883 28,883

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

2,109 2,109

Dividends paid to parent company

(29,700 ) 29,700

Dividends paid

(16,473 ) (16,473 )

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

(757 ) (757 )

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(15,121 ) 196,628 45,532 227,039

Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks

(3,165 ) (2 ) 45,695 3,421 45,949

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

24,298 600 363,620 (24,844 ) 363,674

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 21,133 $ 598 $ 409,315 $ (21,423 ) $ 409,623

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016 there have not been any cash flows associated with discontinued operations.

119


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Quarter ended March 31, 2015
All other
Popular, Inc. PNA subsidiaries Elimination Popular, Inc.

(In thousands)

Holding Co. Holding Co. and eliminations entries Consolidated

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income (loss)

$ 74,826 $ (1,450 ) $ 86,742 $ (85,292 ) $ 74,826

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

Equity in undistributed (earnings) losses of subsidiaries

(81,565 ) (2,610 ) 84,175

Provision for loan losses

40,035 40,035

Amortization of intangibles

2,104 2,104

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

194 11,725 11,919

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

(19,100 ) (19,100 )

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

4,929 4,929

FDIC loss-share income

(4,139 ) (4,139 )

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

4,526 4,526

Earnings from investments under the equity method

(2,968 ) 828 (161 ) (2,301 )

Deferred income tax expense

23,135 245 23,380

(Gain) loss on:

Disposition of premises and equipment

(978 ) (978 )

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held for sale and mortgage banking activities

(7,222 ) (7,222 )

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

14,851 14,851

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

(121,929 ) (121,929 )

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

27,547 27,547

Net originations on loans held-for-sale

(179,604 ) (179,604 )

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

(126 ) 178,068 177,942

Accrued income receivable

(56 ) 81 (94 ) 56 (13 )

Other assets

3,716 28 (27,900 ) (3,871 ) (28,027 )

Net (decrease) increase in:

Interest payable

(7,875 ) (2,629 ) 344 (56 ) (10,216 )

Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations

1,019 1,019

Other liabilities

(12,816 ) (7 ) (9,797 ) 3,243 (19,377 )

Total adjustments

(101,496 ) (4,309 ) (62,641 ) 83,792 (84,654 )

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

(26,670 ) (5,759 ) 24,101 (1,500 ) (9,828 )

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net (increase) decrease in money market investments

(38 ) (1,457 ) (484,791 ) 1,457 (484,829 )

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

(411,189 ) (411,189 )

Held-to-maturity

(250 ) (250 )

Other

(2,520 ) (2,520 )

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

385,672 385,672

Held-to-maturity

2,231 2,231

Other

30,785 30,785

Proceeds from sale of investment securities:

Other

1,388 1,388

Net repayments on loans

10,392 154,788 (10,386 ) 154,794

Proceeds from sale of loans

19,127 19,127

Acquisition of loan portfolios

(49,510 ) (49,510 )

Net payments from FDIC under loss-sharing agreements

132,265 132,265

Net cash received and acquired from business combination

711,051 711,051

Mortgage servicing rights purchased

(2,400 ) (2,400 )

Acquisition of premises and equipment

(242 ) (9,989 ) (10,231 )

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment

3 3,090 3,093

Foreclosed assets

40,161 40,161

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

10,115 (1,457 ) 519,909 (8,929 ) 519,638

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

250,582 15,324 265,906

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

(139,013 ) (139,013 )

Other short-term borrowings

7,214 (165,815 ) 10,386 (148,215 )

Payments of notes payable

(419,487 ) (419,487 )

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

46,000 46,000

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

1,405 1,405

Dividends paid to parent company

(1,500 ) 1,500

Dividends paid

(620 ) (620 )

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

(1,105 ) (1,105 )

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(320 ) 7,214 (429,233 ) 27,210 (395,129 )

Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks

(16,875 ) (2 ) 114,777 16,781 114,681

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

20,448 608 380,890 (20,851 ) 381,095

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 3,573 $ 606 $ 495,667 $ (4,070 ) $ 495,776

The Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

120


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report includes management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of the consolidated financial position and financial performance of Popular, Inc. (the “Corporation” or “Popular”). All accompanying tables, financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report should be considered an integral part of this analysis.

The Corporation is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States (“U.S.”) mainland, and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail, mortgage, and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as investment banking, broker-dealer, auto and equipment leasing and financing, and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the U.S. mainland, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA focuses efforts and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA operates branches in New York, New Jersey and Southern Florida under the name of Popular Community Bank (“PCB”). E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporation’s business segments. As of March 31, 2016, the Corporation had a 15.58% interest in the holding company of EVERTEC, which provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, including servicing many of the Corporation’s system infrastructures and transaction processing businesses. At March 31, 2016, the Corporation’s investment in EVERTEC had a carrying amount of $35.2 million. Also, the Corporation had a 15.84% stake in Centro Financiero BHD Leon, S.A. (“BHD Leon”), one of the largest banking and financial services groups in the Dominican Republic. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Corporation recorded $6.2 million in earnings from its investment in BHD Leon, which had a carrying amount of $122.6 million, as of the end of the quarter.

OVERVIEW

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation recorded net income of $85.0 million, compared to a net income of $74.8 million for the same quarter of the previous year. The increase of $10.2 million in net income was driven by higher net interest income and lower operating expenses, partially offset by a higher provision for loan losses and lower non-interest income.

Table 1 provides selected financial data and performance indicators for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Table 1—Financial highlights

Financial Condition Highlights

Average for the First Quarter

(In thousands)

March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
Variance March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015
Variance

Money market investments

$ 1,917,460 $ 2,180,092 $ (262,632 ) $ 2,186,771 $ 1,930,393 $ 256,378

Investment and trading securities

6,984,354 6,407,802 576,552 6,764,453 5,836,371 928,082

Loans

23,258,182 23,129,230 128,952 22,985,578 22,504,974 480,604

Earning assets

32,159,996 31,717,124 442,872 31,936,802 30,271,738 1,665,064

Total assets

36,147,009 35,761,733 385,276 35,891,768 33,806,058 2,085,710

Deposits

27,526,593 27,209,723 316,870 27,337,586 25,585,108 1,752,478

Borrowings

2,349,992 2,425,853 (75,861 ) 2,440,979 2,876,718 (435,739 )

Stockholders’ equity

5,250,300 5,105,324 144,976 5,191,395 4,321,095 870,300

Liabilities from discontinued operations

1,815 1,815 1,815 2,894 (1,079 )

121


Table of Contents

Operating Highlights

First Quarter

(In thousands, except per share information)

2016 2015 Variance

Net interest income

$ 352,412 $ 343,195 $ 9,217

Provision for loan losses—non-covered loans

47,940 29,711 18,229

Provision for loan losses—covered loans

(3,105 ) 10,324 (13,429 )

Non-interest income

111,630 115,235 (3,605 )

Operating expenses

301,943 312,342 (10,399 )

Income from continuing operations before income tax

117,264 106,053 11,211

Income tax expense

32,265 32,568 (303 )

Income from continuing operations

$ 84,999 $ 73,485 $ 11,514

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

1,341 (1,341 )

Net income

$ 84,999 $ 74,826 $ 10,173

Net income applicable to common stock

$ 84,068 $ 73,896 $ 10,172

Net income from continuing operations

$ 0.81 $ 0.71 $ 0.10

Net income from discontinued operations

$ $ 0.01 $ (0.01 )

Net income per common share—Basic

$ 0.81 $ 0.72 $ 0.09

Net income from continuing operations

$ 0.81 $ 0.71 $ 0.10

Net income from discontinued operations

$ $ 0.01 $ (0.01 )

Net income per common share—Diluted

$ 0.81 $ 0.72 $ 0.09

Dividends declared per common share—Basic

$ 0.15 $ $ 0.15

First Quarter

Selected Statistical Information

2016 2015

Common Stock Data

Market price

High

$ 28.80 $ 35.58

Low

22.62 30.52

End

28.61 34.39

Book value per common share at period end

50.16 41.81

Profitability Ratios

Return on assets

0.95 % 0.90 %

Return on common equity

6.58 7.02

Net interest spread (taxable equivalent)

4.47 4.64

Net interest margin (taxable equivalent)

4.70 4.85

Capitalization Ratios

Average equity to average assets

14.46 % 12.78 %

Common equity Tier 1 capital

15.79 15.74

Tier I capital

15.79 16.11

Total capital

18.78 18.71

Tier 1 leverage

11.46 11.80

Adjusted results of operations – Non-GAAP financial measure

The Corporation prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements using accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”), or the (“reported basis”). In addition to analyzing the Corporation’s results on a reported basis, management monitors the performance of the Corporation on an “adjusted basis” and excludes the impact of certain transactions on the results of its operations. Throughout this MD&A, the Corporation presents a discussion of its financial results excluding the impact of these events to arrive at the “adjusted results”. Management believes that the “adjusted results” provide meaningful information about the underlying performance of the Corporation’s ongoing operations. The “adjusted results” are a Non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to tables 40 and 41 for a reconciliation of the reported results for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. No adjustments are included for the quarter ended March 31, 2016.

Non-GAAP financial measures used by the Corporation may not be comparable to similarly named non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.

122


Table of Contents

Financial highlights for the quarter ended March 31, 2016

The Corporation recorded net income of $85.0 million, compared to a net income of $74.8 million for the same quarter of the previous year. The adjusted net income for the first quarter of 2015 was $90.3 million. Refer to table 41 for a detail of the adjustments to arrive at the adjusted net income.

Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased by $9.7 million, driven by higher volume of investment securities and loans which benefited from the acquisition of the Doral Bank portfolio. The income from the WB loans declined as the portfolio continues its expected run off. Net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the first quarter of 2016 was 4.70% compared to 4.85% in the same quarter of 2015. An unfavorable variance in the FDIC loss share expense and lower mortgage banking income drove non-interest income down, which was partially offset by higher income from equity method investments, for a net decline of $2.5 million on an adjusted basis. The total provision for loan losses increased by $4.8 million, reflecting the prevailing economic conditions in Puerto Rico and growth in the U.S. portfolio, mainly on commercial loans. Operating expenses increased by $10.4 million, mainly from higher personnel costs, including incentives and the impact of actuarial revisions for pension costs, offset by lower OREO expenses. Refer to the Operating Results Analysis section of this MD&A for additional information.

Total non-performing assets, including covered, were $848 million at March 31, 2016, an increase of $5 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2015. The increase was mainly due to higher OREOs at BPPR and the impact of a single $11 million credit relationship at BPNA, partially offset by lower mortgage NPLs at BPPR driven by improved collection efforts. At March 31, 2016, NPLs to total loans held-in-portfolio remained flat at 2.7% from December 31, 2015. Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for an explanation of the main factors impacting the provision for loan losses and a detailed analysis of net charge-offs, non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics.

The Corporation’s total assets at March 31, 2016 amounted to $36.1 billion, compared to $35.8 billion, at December 31, 2015. Money market and investment securities increased by $323.8 million, due mainly to purchases of mortgage backed securities. The loan portfolios experienced an increase of $129 million, mainly from growth in the U.S. commercial, construction and consumer portfolios. Total deposits increased by $316.9 million, mainly from government deposit accounts at BPPR and money market accounts at BPNA, offset by lower brokered CDs. Total borrowings declined by $76 million due to maturities of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.

Stockholders’ equity totalled $5.3 billion at March 31, 2016, compared with $5.1 billion at December 31, 2015. The increase resulted from the Corporation’s net income of $85 million, a favorable variance of $73 million in unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, partially offset by payments of dividends of $15.5 million on common stock of $0.15 per share and $0.9 million in dividends on preferred stock.

Refer to the Financial Condition Analysis section of this MD&A for additional information.

Capital ratios continued to be strong. As of March 31, 2016, the Corporation’s Common equity Tier 1 Capital ratio was 15.79% while the tangible common equity ratio was 12.73%. Refer to Table 13 for capital ratios and Table 14 for Non-GAAP reconciliations.

123


Table of Contents

As a financial services company, the Corporation’s earnings are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation are influenced by the level of business spending and investment, consumer income, spending and savings, capital market activities, competition, customer preferences, interest rate conditions and prevailing market rates on competing products.

The Corporation continuously monitors general business and economic conditions, industry-related indicators and trends, competition, interest rate volatility, credit quality indicators, loan and deposit demand, operational and systems efficiencies, revenue enhancements and changes in the regulation of financial services companies.

The Corporation operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and local laws and regulations. Also, competition with other financial institutions could adversely affect its profitability.

The description of the Corporation’s business contained in Item 1 of the Corporation’s 2015 Form 10-K, while not all inclusive, discusses additional information about the business of the Corporation and risk factors, many beyond the Corporation’s control that, in addition to the other information in this Form 10-Q, readers should consider.

The Corporation’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol BPOP.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES

The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and general practices within the financial services industry. Various elements of the Corporation’s accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those estimates.

Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and estimates with the Corporation’s Audit Committee. The Corporation has identified as critical accounting policies those related to: (i) Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments; (ii) Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses; (iii) Acquisition Accounting for Loans and Related Indemnification Asset; (iv) Income Taxes; (v) Goodwill, and (vi) Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations. For a summary of these critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to that particular section in the MD&A included in Popular, Inc.’s 2015 Form 10-K. Also, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2015 Form 10-K for a summary of the Corporation’s significant accounting policies.

OPERATING RESULTS ANALYSIS

Net interest income

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis-Non-GAAP financial measure

Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented with its different components on Table 2 for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 as compared with the same period in 2015, segregated by major categories of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.

The interest earning assets include investment securities and loans that are exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are certain investments in obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies and sponsored entities, and certain obligations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its agencies and assets held by the Corporation’s international banking entities. To facilitate the comparison of all interest related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent basis, using the applicable statutory income tax rates for each period. The taxable

124


Table of Contents

equivalent computation considers the interest expense and other related expense disallowances required by the Puerto Rico tax law. Under this law, the exempt interest can be deducted up to the amount of taxable income. Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes that this presentation provides meaningful information since it facilitates the comparison of revenues arising from taxable and exempt sources.

Average outstanding securities balances are based on amortized cost excluding any unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans have been included in the respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest yield. Prepayment penalties, late fees collected and the amortization of premiums / discounts on purchased loans are also included as part of the loan yield. Interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 included a favorable impact, excluding the discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under Subtopic ASC 310-30, of $4.8 million, related to those items, compared with a favorable impact of $1.6 million in the same period in 2015; the increase is driven by the amortizations related to Doral acquired loans.

Net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the first quarter of 2016 was 4.70% compared to 4.85% in the same quarter of 2015, a decrease of 15 basis points. Net interest income increased by $9.7 million compared to the same quarter in the previous year. The main drivers of the increase in net interest income and decrease in net interest margin are:

Positive variances:

Higher interest income from investment securities due mainly to higher volumes of mortgage backed securities as part of the Corporation’s investment strategy.

Increase in interest income from loans excluding Westernbank Bank (WB) loans mostly related to the acquisition of Doral Bank in February 27, 2015 and higher volume of auto loans due to improved lending activity at Popular Auto.

These positive variances were partially offset by:

Lower interest income from WB loans related to a lower volume as part of the normal portfolio run-off and lower yields, reflecting the impact on the quarterly recast process.

Higher interest expense on deposits mainly due to higher average volumes also related to the Doral Bank acquisition and to fund U.S. loan growth, partially offset by a decrease in broker CDs. The increase in deposit cost is mostly related to a higher cost of time deposits and money markets in the U.S.

125


Table of Contents

Table 2—Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Continuing Operations

Quarters ended March 31,

Variance
Average Volume Average Yields / Costs Interest Attributable to
2016 2015 Variance 2016 2015 Variance 2016 2015 Variance Rate Volume
($ in millions) (In thousands)
$ 2,187 $ 1,930 $ 257 0.53 % 0.30 % 0.23 %

Money market investments

$ 2,863 $ 1,447 $ 1,416 $ 1,332 $ 84
6,641 5,637 1,004 2.90 2.67 0.23

Investment securities

48,117 37,643 10,474 175 10,299
123 200 (77 ) 7.08 6.77 0.31

Trading securities

2,172 3,344 (1,172 ) 176 (1,348 )

8,951 7,767 1,184 2.38 2.19 0.19

Total money market, investment and trading securities

53,152 42,434 10,718 1,683 9,035

Loans:

8,957 8,383 574 5.12 5.17 (0.05 )

Commercial

114,091 106,887 7,204 (97 ) 7,301
704 435 269 5.30 5.67 (0.37 )

Construction

9,288 6,076 3,212 (361 ) 3,573
630 569 61 6.78 7.01 (0.23 )

Leasing

10,675 9,974 701 (339 ) 1,040
6,830 6,733 97 5.50 5.35 0.15

Mortgage

93,895 90,042 3,853 2,543 1,310
3,807 3,845 (38 ) 10.51 10.36 0.15

Consumer

99,520 98,249 1,271 1,786 (515 )

20,928 19,965 963 6.28 6.29 (0.01 )

Sub-total loans

327,469 311,228 16,241 3,532 12,709
2,058 2,540 (482 ) 8.76 9.14 (0.38 )

WB loans

44,904 57,431 (12,527 ) (1,780 ) (10,747 )

22,986 22,505 481 6.50 6.62 (0.12 )

Total loans

372,373 368,659 3,714 1,752 1,962

$ 31,937 $ 30,272 $ 1,665 5.35 % 5.48 % (0.13 )%

Total earning assets

$ 425,525 $ 411,093 $ 14,432 $ 3,435 $ 10,997

Interest bearing deposits:

$ 5,712 $ 4,983 $ 729 0.39 % 0.34 % 0.05 %

NOW and money market [1]

$ 5,607 $ 4,219 $ 1,388 $ 602 $ 786
7,275 6,892 383 0.23 0.23

Savings

4,248 3,924 324 43 281
8,058 7,747 311 1.00 0.93 0.07

Time deposits

20,019 17,721 2,298 1,081 1,217

21,045 19,622 1,423 0.57 0.53 0.04

Total deposits

29,874 25,864 4,010 1,726 2,284

812 1,114 (302 ) 0.92 0.63 0.29

Short-term borrowings

1,861 1,734 127 767 (640 )
1,629 1,763 (134 ) 4.90 4.39 0.51

Other medium and long-term debt

19,873 19,281 592 1,551 (959 )

23,486 22,499 987 0.88 0.84 0.04

Total interest bearing liabilities

51,608 46,879 4,729 4,044 685

6,293 5,963 330

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

2,158 1,810 348

Other sources of funds

$ 31,937 $ 30,272 $ 1,665 0.65 % 0.63 % 0.02 %

Total source of funds

51,608 46,879 4,729 4,044 685

4.70 % 4.85 % (0.15 )%

Net interest margin

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis

373,917 364,214 9,703 $ (609 ) $ 10,312
4.47 % 4.64 % (0.17 )%

Net interest spread

Taxable equivalent adjustment

21,505 21,019 486

Net interest income

$ 352,412 $ 343,195 $ 9,217

Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based on the proportion of the change in each category.
[1] Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto Rico.

126


Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses

The Corporation’s total provision for loan losses was $44.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, compared to $40.0 million for the same quarter of the previous year, an increase of $4.8 million.

The provision for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio totaled $47.9 million, compared to $29.7 million for the same quarter in 2015, increasing by $18.2 million. Net charge-offs increased by $6.6 million from the same quarter of the prior year.

The provision for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio at the BPPR segment increased by $12.0 million from the first quarter of 2015. Net charge-offs increased by $3.9 million from the same quarter of the prior year. In addition, the provision for the first quarter of 2016 includes $2.7 million related to commercial Westernbank loans previously covered under the shared loss agreement with the FDIC which expired on June 30, 2015.

The provision for loan losses for the BPNA segment was $4.1 million, compared to a $2.2 million reversal of provision during the same quarter in 2015. Credit trends for the BPNA segment continued stable with minimal net charge-offs. Provision increase was mainly driven by loan growth.

For the covered portfolio, the Corporation recorded a reserve release of $3.1 million in the first quarter of 2016, compared to $10.3 million provision expense for the same quarter in 2015, mostly reflective of the reclassification to non-covered loans of the non-single family loans that were previously covered by the commercial loss agreement with the FDIC during the second quarter of 2015, as mentioned above.

Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality sections of this MD&A for a detailed analysis of net charge-offs, non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income was $111.6 million for the first quarter of 2016, a decrease of $3.6 million when compared with the same quarter of the previous year. Excluding the impact of the transactions detailed in the Adjusted Results Non-GAAP tables, non-interest income decreased by $2.5 million when compared to the previous year, driven primarily by the following:

Unfavorable variance in FDIC loss share (expense) income of $7.3 million as a result of lower mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses and credit impairment losses, and an unfavorable change in the fair value of the true-up payment obligation, partially offset by lower amortization of the indemnification asset. Refer to Table 3 for a breakdown of FDIC loss share (expense) income by major categories.

Lower income from mortgage banking activities by $2.3 million as a result of higher trading account loss due to higher realized losses on closed derivative positions and higher unfavorable fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights, partially offset by higher mortgage servicing fees, including those from the portfolio acquired from Doral Bank. Refer to Note 12 for details of mortgage banking activities.

These decreases were partially offset by:

Favorable variance in other non-interest income by $7.1 million due to higher earnings from investments under the equity method.

127


Table of Contents

Table 3—Financial Information—Westernbank FDIC-Assisted Transaction

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Interest income on WB loans

$ 44,904 $ 57,431

FDIC loss share (expense) income:

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

(4,042 ) (27,316 )

80% mirror accounting on credit impairment losses (reversal) [1]

(2,093 ) 8,246

80% mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses

3,950 21,545

80% mirror accounting on recoveries on covered assets, including rental income on OREOs, subject to reimbursement to the FDIC

(645 ) (2,619 )

Change in true-up payment obligation

(443 ) 4,164

Other

127 119

Total FDIC loss share (expense) income

(3,146 ) 4,139

Total revenues

41,758 61,570

Provision (reversal) for loan losses- WB loans

(356 ) 10,324

Total revenues less provision (reversal) for loan losses

$ 42,114 $ 51,246

[1] Reductions in expected cash flows for ASC 310-30 loans, which may impact the provision for loan losses, may consider reductions in both principal and interest cash flow expectations. The amount covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements for interest not collected from borrowers is limited under the agreements (approximately 90 days); accordingly, these amounts are not subject fully to the 80% mirror accounting.

Average balances

Quarters ended March 31,

(In millions)

2016 2015

Loans

$ 2,058 $ 2,540

FDIC loss share asset

233 429

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 decreased by $ 10.4 million when compared with the same quarter of 2015. Excluding the impact of certain transactions, as detailed in Tables 40 through 41, operating expenses increased by $10.4 million due mainly to the following factors:

Higher personnel cost by $13.1 million due to the grant of employee restricted stock and performance shares awards during the quarter, higher salaries impacted by the higher headcount as a result of the Doral Bank Transaction, and higher pension cost due to changes in actuarial assumptions;

Higher professional fees by $6.9 million, due to higher programming, application processing and hosting expenses including the impact of the enacted business-to-business sales tax in Puerto Rico;

Higher other taxes by $1.6 million, as a result of higher municipal license tax;

Higher equipment expenses by $1.1 million, principally due to higher software maintenance expense at BPPR; and

Higher amortization of intangibles by $1.0 million, mainly due to the amortization of the customer relationship intangible of the Doral Insurance portfolio, which was acquired on May 2015.

These increases were partially offset by the following decreases:

Lower other real estate owned expenses by $13.9 million, due to lower commercial and construction write-downs at BPPR.

128


Table of Contents

Table 4—Operating Expenses

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015 Variance

Personnel costs:

Salaries

$ 77,298 $ 72,394 $ 4,904

Commissions, incentives and other bonuses

20,769 18,458 2,311

Pension, postretirement and medical insurance

13,111 12,013 1,098

Other personnel costs, including payroll taxes

15,913 13,593 2,320

Total personnel costs

127,091 116,458 10,633

Net occupancy expenses

20,430 21,709 (1,279 )

Equipment expenses

14,548 13,411 1,137

Other taxes

10,195 8,574 1,621

Professional fees:

Collections, appraisals and other credit related fees

4,500 5,923 (1,423 )

Programming, processing and other technology services

49,864 45,161 4,703

Other professional fees

21,095 24,444 (3,349 )

Total professional fees

75,459 75,528 (69 )

Communications

6,320 6,176 144

Business promotion

11,110 10,813 297

FDIC deposit insurance

7,370 6,398 972

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

9,141 23,069 (13,928 )

Other operating expenses:

Credit and debit card processing, volume and interchange expenses

5,722 4,821 901

Transportation and travel

1,449 1,739 (290 )

Printing and supplies

624 819 (195 )

Operational losses

2,661 3,249 (588 )

All other

6,709 6,721 (12 )

Total other operating expenses

17,165 17,349 (184 )

Amortization of intangibles

3,114 2,104 1,010

Restructuring Cost

10,753 (10,753 )

Total operating expenses

$ 301,943 $ 312,342 $ (10,399 )

INCOME TAXES

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $32.3 million, compared to $32.6 million for the same quarter of the previous year. Adjusting for the tax effect of certain transactions detailed in Table 40, Non-GAAP results, the income tax expense for the first quarter of 2015 was of $35.5 million.

The effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2016 was 28%, flat when compared to the same quarter of the previous year, on an adjusted basis. The effective tax rate is impacted by the composition and source of the taxable income. The increase in the income tax expense at the U.S. operations during the first quarter of 2016 was offset by a lower tax provision at the P.R. operations during such period. The Corporation is subject to a 39% statutory income tax rate in Puerto Rico. For the first quarter 2016, the effective tax rate was 28%, reflecting the impact of net exempt interest income and other items which reduce the rate. The impact of these was partially offset by an effective tax rate for the U.S. operations of approximately 47%.

Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of the statutory income tax rate to the effective tax rate and additional information on income taxes.

129


Table of Contents

REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS

The Corporation’s reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. These reportable segments pertain only to the continuing operations of Popular, Inc. As previously indicated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida were classified as discontinued operations and sold during 2014.

A Corporate group has been defined to support the reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the Corporate group are not allocated to the reportable segments.

For a description of the Corporation’s reportable segments, including additional financial information and the underlying management accounting process, refer to Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Corporate group reported a net loss of $20.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, compared with a net loss of $21.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

Highlights on the earnings results for the reportable segments are discussed below:

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment’s net income amounted to $93.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, compared with a net income of $90.8 million for the same quarter of the previous year. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

Lower net interest income by $1.3 million mostly due to:

A decrease $12.5 million in income from the WB loans portfolio due to lower yields by 38 basis points and lower average balances by $481 million as part of the normal portfolio run-off and loan resolutions.

Partially offset by:

An increase of $5.2 million in income from mortgage loans mostly due to higher average balances by $248 million, which benefited from the portfolio acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction; and

Higher income from investment securities by $5.6 million mostly due to higher average balances by $979 million.

The net interest margin was 4.87% for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, compared to 5.00% for the same period in 2016.

Provision for loan losses of $40.8 million, a decrease of $1.4 million, driven by a reserve release of $3.1 million in the covered loans portfolio, partially offset by higher provision for the non-covered loans portfolio;

Lower non-interest income by $5.0 million mainly due to:

Negative variance in FDIC loss share expense of $7.3 million due to lower mirror accounting, mainly on credit impairment losses and OREO losses, partially offset by lower amortization of the loss share asset; and

Lower mortgage banking activities revenues by $2.4 million due to unfavorable variances of $3.6 million in the MSR valuation and $1.1 million in realized losses on closed derivative positions, partially offset by higher mortgage servicing fees by $2.6 million including those from the portfolio acquired from Doral Bank.

Partially offset by:

Higher other operating income by $3.8 million mostly due to a favorable variance of $2.2 million in income from equity method investments and higher gains on sales of daily rental autos by $0.8 million; and

Higher service charges on deposit accounts by $0.8 million mainly from retail banking customers.

130


Table of Contents
Operating expenses were lower by $1.9 million mainly due to:

OREO expenses favorable variance of $10.5 million as a result of lower write-downs on commercial and construction properties.

Partially offset by:

Higher personnel costs by $6.8 million driven by a higher headcount impacted by the Doral Bank Transaction and higher pension costs due to changes in actuarial assumptions and higher savings plan contributions due to a higher headcount and an increase in employer matching contributions effective July 2015; and

Higher equipment expenses by $1.8 million mostly due to higher software packages expense.

Lower income tax expense by $5.6 million.

Banco Popular North America

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the reportable segment of Banco Popular North America reported net income of $11.9 million, compared to net income from continuing operations of $3.3 million for the same quarter of the previous year. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

Net interest income was $62.3 million, an increase of $10.2 million compared to the same quarter of the previous year. The net interest income improvement is mostly due to higher income from loans by $15.0 million, mainly commercial, construction and consumer, due to higher volumes by $1.0 billion which benefited from the loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction. This increase was partially offset by higher interest expense from deposits by $4.5 million due to higher average balances by $1.2 billion largely due to the deposits assumed as part of the Doral Bank Transaction. Net interest margin was 3.70% compared to 3.82% for the same quarter of the previous year;

Provision for loan losses higher by $6.3 million mainly driven by loan growth;

Lower non-interest income by $1.2 million, mostly due to lower other service fees by $0.4 million, mainly lower insurance and banking fees, and lower other operating income by $0.6 million mainly due to servicing income recognized in March 2015 as BPNA was servicing on an interim basis the loans sold to JC Flowers and Centennial Bank as part of the Doral Bank Transaction;

Lower operating expenses by $13.4 million mainly due to restructuring costs of $10.8 million in the first quarter of 2015 and lower OREO expenses by $3.4 million mainly due lower write-downs of commercial OREO properties; and

Unfavorable variance in income tax expense of $7.5 million since for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 the U.S. operations had a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax asset.

FINANCIAL CONDITION ANALYSIS

Assets

The Corporation’s total assets were $36.1 billion at March 31, 2016 compared to $35.8 billion at December 31, 2015. Refer to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition as of such dates.

Money market investments, trading and investment securities

Money market investments totaled $1.9 billion at March 31, 2016, compared to $2.2 billion at December 31, 2015. The decrease was mainly at BPNA by $212 million and at BPPR by $50 million and is mostly related to purchases of mortgage backed securities (“MBS”) as discussed below.

Trading account securities amounted to $71 million at March 31, 2016, relatively flat when compared to $72 million at December 31, 2015. Refer to the Market Risk section of this MD&A for a table that provides a breakdown of the trading portfolio by security type.

Investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity amounted to $6.7 billion at March 31, 2016, compared with $6.2 billion at December 31, 2015. The increase of $585 million is mainly due to purchases of MBS at both BPPR and BPNA.

131


Table of Contents

Table 5 provides a breakdown of the Corporation’s portfolio of investment securities available-for-sale (“AFS”) and held-to-maturity (“HTM”) on a combined basis. Also, Notes 7 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements provide additional information with respect to the Corporation’s investment securities AFS and HTM. The portfolio of obligations of the Puerto Rico Government is mainly comprised of securities with specific sources of income or revenues identified for repayments.

Table 5—Breakdown of Investment Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

U.S. Treasury securities

$ 1,323,352 $ 1,183,328

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

932,938 939,641

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

120,860 121,176

Collateralized mortgage obligations

1,513,657 1,560,923

Mortgage-backed securities

2,843,706 2,344,196

Equity securities

2,439 2,398

Others

12,094 12,233

Total investment securities AFS and HTM

$ 6,749,046 $ 6,163,895

Loans

Refer to Table 6 for a breakdown of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, the principal category of earning assets. Loans covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements are presented separately in Table 6. The risks on covered loans are significantly different as a result of the loss protection provided by the FDIC. As of March 31, 2016, the Corporation’s covered loans portfolio amounted to $625 million, comprised mainly of residential mortgage loans.

Refer to Note 9 for detailed information about the Corporation’s loan portfolio composition and loan purchases and sales.

The Corporation’s total loan portfolio amounted to $23.3 billion at March 31, 2016, compared to $23.1 billion at December 31, 2015. The total loans portfolio increased by $129 million, mainly from commercial, construction and consumer loans at BPNA.

132


Table of Contents

Table 6—Loans Ending Balances

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Variance

Loans not covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements:

Commercial

$ 10,228,389 $ 10,099,163 $ 129,226

Construction

734,858 681,106 53,752

Legacy [1]

61,044 64,436 (3,392 )

Lease financing

643,142 627,650 15,492

Mortgage

6,979,201 7,036,081 (56,880 )

Consumer

3,861,103 3,837,679 23,424

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

22,507,737 22,346,115 161,622

Loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements:

Mortgage

606,711 627,102 (20,391 )

Consumer

18,419 19,013 (594 )

Total covered loans held-in-portfolio

625,130 646,115 (20,985 )

Total loans held-in-portfolio

23,132,867 22,992,230 140,637

Loans held-for-sale:

Commercial

42,771 45,074 (2,303 )

Construction

2 95 (93 )

Mortgage

82,542 91,831 (9,289 )

Total loans held-for-sale

125,315 137,000 (11,685 )

Total loans

$ 23,258,182 $ 23,129,230 $ 128,952

[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

Non-covered loans

The non-covered loans held-in-portfolio increased by $162 million to $22.5 billion at March 31, 2016. The increase is mainly at BPNA by $207 million, driven by growth in the commercial, construction and consumer loan portfolios, which include consumer loan portfolio purchases of $86 million, partially offset by a decrease of $45 million at BPPR mainly due to lower originations of credit cards and residential mortgages.

The loans held-for-sale portfolio decreased by $12 million from December 31, 2015, mainly at BPPR due mostly to lower originations of mortgage loans held-for-sale.

Covered loans

The covered loans portfolio amounted to $625 million at March 31, 2016, compared to $646 million at December 31, 2015. The decrease of $21 million is mostly from residential mortgage loans due to loan resolutions and the normal portfolio run-off. Refer to Table 6 for a breakdown of the covered loans by major loan type categories.

Tables 7 and 8 provide the activity in the carrying amount and outstanding discount on the Westernbank loans accounted for under ASC 310-30. The outstanding accretable discount is impacted by increases in cash flow expectations on the loan pool based on quarterly revisions of the portfolio. The increase in the accretable discount is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of each applicable loan pool.

133


Table of Contents

Table 7—Activity in the Carrying Amount of Westernbank Loans Accounted for Under ASC 310-30

Quarters ended
March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Beginning balance

$ 1,974,501 $ 2,444,172

Accretion

43,533 55,697

Collections / charge-offs

(82,593 ) (132,773 )

Ending balance

$ 1,935,441 $ 2,367,096

Allowance for loan losses (ALLL)

(62,967 ) (68,386 )

Ending balance, net of ALLL

$ 1,872,474 $ 2,298,710

Table 8—Activity in the Accretable Yield on Westernbank Loans Accounted for Under ASC 310-30

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Beginning balance

$ 1,112,458 $ 1,271,337

Accretion [1]

(43,533 ) (55,697 )

Change in expected cash flows

59,883 43,308

Ending balance

$ 1,128,808 $ 1,258,948

[1] Positive to earnings, which is included in interest income.

FDIC loss share asset

Table 9 sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss share asset for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Table 9—Activity of Loss Share Asset

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Balance at beginning of period

$ 310,221 $ 542,454

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

(4,042 ) (27,316 )

Credit impairment losses (reversal) to be covered under loss-sharing agreements

(2,093 ) 8,246

Reimbursable expenses

3,950 21,545

Net payments from FDIC under loss-sharing agreements

(88,588 ) (132,265 )

Other adjustments attributable to FDIC loss-sharing agreements

(2,820 )

Balance at end of period

$ 219,448 $ 409,844

The FDIC loss share indemnification asset is recognized on the same basis as the assets subject to the loss share protection from the FDIC, except that the amortization / accretion terms differ. Decreases in expected reimbursements from the FDIC due to improvements in expected cash flows to be received from borrowers, as compared with the initial estimates, are recognized as a reduction to non-interest income prospectively over the life of the loss share agreements. This is because the indemnification asset balance is being reduced to the expected reimbursement amount from the FDIC. Table 10 presents the activity associated with the outstanding balance of the FDIC loss share asset amortization (or negative discount) for the periods presented.

Table 10—Activity in the Remaining FDIC Loss Share Asset Discount

Quarters ended March 31,

(In thousands)

2016 2015

Balance at beginning of period [1]

$ 26,100 $ 53,095

Amortization of negative discount [2]

(4,042 ) (27,316 )

Impact of lower projected losses

3,147 12,908

Balance at end of period

$ 25,205 $ 38,687

[1] Positive balance represents negative discount (debit to assets), while a negative balance represents a discount (credit to assets).
[2] Amortization results in a negative impact to non-interest income, while a positive balance results in a positive impact to non-interest income, particularly FDIC loss share income / expense.

134


Table of Contents

The Corporation revises its expected cash flows and estimated credit losses on a quarterly basis. The lowered loss estimates requires the Corporation to amortize the loss share asset to its currently lower expected collectible balance, thus resulting in negative accretion. Due to the shorter life of the indemnity asset compared with the expected life of the covered loans, this negative accretion temporarily offsets the benefit of higher cash flows accounted through the accretable yield on the loans.

Other real estate owned

Other real estate owned represents real estate property received in satisfaction of debt. At March 31, 2016, OREO increased to $202 million from $192 million at March 31, 2015 mainly at BPPR. Refer to Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for the activity in other real estate owned. The amounts included as “covered other real estate” are subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements.

Other assets

Refer to Note 15 for a breakdown of the principal categories that comprise the caption of “Other Assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Other assets decreased by $37 million from December 31, 2015 to March 31, 2016, due mostly to a decrease in the deferred tax asset of $27 million and prepaid taxes of $6 million.

Goodwill

Goodwill increased by $5 million from December 31, 2015 to March 31, 2016, due to a goodwill adjustment related to the Doral Bank Transaction. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the Corporation’s goodwill.

Liabilities

The Corporation’s total liabilities were $30.9 billion at March 31, 2016 compared to $30.7 billion at December 31, 2015. Refer to the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition included in this Form 10-Q.

Deposits and Borrowings

The composition of the Corporation’s financing sources to total assets at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is included in Table 11.

Table 11—Financing to Total Assets

March 31, December 31, % increase (decrease) % of total assets

(In millions)

2016 2015 from 2015 to 2016 2016 2015

Non-interest bearing deposits

$ 6,384 $ 6,402 (0.3 )% 17.7 % 17.9 %

Interest-bearing core deposits

16,281 15,641 4.1 45.0 43.7

Other interest-bearing deposits

4,862 5,167 (5.9 ) 13.5 14.4

Fed funds purchased and repurchase agreements

760 762 (0.3 ) 2.1 2.1

Other short-term borrowings

6 1 500.0

Notes payable

1,584 1,663 (4.8 ) 4.4 4.7

Other liabilities

1,018 1,019 (0.1 ) 2.8 2.9

Liabilities from discontinued operations

2 2

Stockholders’ equity

5,250 5,105 2.8 14.5 14.3

135


Table of Contents

Deposits

The Corporation’s deposits totaled $27.5 billion at March 31, 2016 compared to $27.2 billion at December 31, 2015. The deposits increase of $317 million is mainly at BPPR by $189 million largely due to increases in government deposit accounts and at BPNA by $128 million mainly from money market accounts and time deposits growth offset by a decline in brokered CD’s. Refer to Table 12 for a breakdown of the Corporation’s deposits at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Table 12—Deposits Ending Balances

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Variance

Demand deposits [1]

$ 7,324,982 $ 7,221,238 $ 103,744

Savings, NOW and money market deposits (non-brokered)

11,940,103 11,440,693 499,410

Savings, NOW and money market deposits (brokered)

383,745 382,424 1,321

Time deposits (non-brokered)

7,348,132 7,274,157 73,975

Time deposits (brokered CDs)

529,631 891,211 (361,580 )

Total deposits

$ 27,526,593 $ 27,209,723 $ 316,870

[1] Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits.

Borrowings

The Corporation’s borrowings amounted to $2.3 billion at March 31, 2016, compared to $2.4 billion at December 31, 2015. The decrease of $76 million is mainly due to maturities of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”). Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the Corporation’s borrowings. Also, refer to the Liquidity section in this MD&A for additional information on the Corporation’s funding sources.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity totaled $5.3 billion at March 31, 2016, compared with $5.1 billion at December 31, 2015. The increase resulted from the Corporation’s net income of $85 million, a favorable variance of $73 million in unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, partially offset by payments of dividends of $15.5 million on common stock of $0.15 per share and $0.9 million in dividends on preferred stock. Refer to the consolidated statements of financial condition, comprehensive income and of changes in stockholders’ equity for information on the composition of stockholders’ equity.

REGULATORY CAPITAL

On January 1, 2015, the Corporation, BPPR and BPNA became subject to Basel III capital requirements, which include a revised minimum and well capitalized regulatory capital ratios and compliance with the standardized approach for determining risk-weighted assets. As of March 31, 2016, the Corporation continues to exceed the well-capitalized adequacy requirements promulgated by the U.S. federal bank regulatory agencies.

Basel III capital rules require the phase out of non-qualifying Tier 1 capital instruments such as trust preferred securities. At March 31, 2016, the Corporation had $427 million in trust preferred securities outstanding which no longer qualified for Tier 1 capital treatment, but instead qualify for Tier 2 capital treatment. At December 31, 2015, approximately $107 million of these trust preferred securities outstanding still qualified as Tier I capital.

As part of the adoption of Basel III Capital Rules, the Corporation, as well as its banking subsidiaries, made the one-time permanent election to exclude the effects on regulatory capital computations of certain accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) items as permitted under the Basel III capital rules.

136


Table of Contents

Risk-based capital ratios presented in Table 13, which include common equity tier 1, Tier 1 capital, total capital and leverage capital as of March 31, 2016, are calculated based on the Basel III regulatory guidance related to the measurement of capital, risk-weighted assets and average assets.

Table 13—Capital Adequacy Data

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Common equity tier 1 capital:

Common stockholders equity—GAAP basis

$ 5,200,140 $ 5,055,164

AOCI related adjustments due to opt-out election

145,115 220,956

Goodwill, net of associated deferred tax liability (DTL)

(566,284 ) (564,323 )

Intangible assets, net of associated DTLs

(31,080 ) (22,222 )

Deferred tax assets and other deductions

(794,966 ) (639,999 )

Common equity tier 1 capital

$ 3,952,925 $ 4,049,576

Additional tier 1 capital:

Preferred stock

50,160 50,160

Trust preferred securities subject to phase out of additional tier 1

106,650

Other additional tier 1 capital deductions

(50,160 ) (156,810 )

Tier 1 capital

$ 3,952,925 $ 4,049,576

Tier 2 capital:

Trust preferred securities subject to phase in as tier 2

426,602 319,952

Other inclusions (deductions), net

322,511 322,881

Tier 2 capital

$ 749,113 $ 642,833

Total risk-based capital

$ 4,702,038 $ 4,692,409

Minimum total capital requirement to be well capitalized

$ 2,504,106 $ 2,498,714

Excess total capital over minimum well capitalized

$ 2,197,932 $ 2,193,695

Total risk-weighted assets

$ 25,041,059 $ 24,987,144

Total assets for leverage ratio

$ 34,508,214 $ 34,253,625

Risk-based capital ratios:

Common equity tier 1 capital

15.79 % 16.21 %

Tier 1 capital

15.79 16.21

Total capital

18.78 18.78

Tier 1 leverage

11.46 11.82

The Basel III Capital Rules provide that a depository institution will be deemed to be well capitalized if it maintains a leverage ratio of at least 5%, a common equity Tier 1 ratio of at least 6.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8% and a total risk-based ratio of at least 10%. Management has determined that as of March 31, 2016, the Corporation, BPPR and BPNA were well-capitalized under Basel III Capital Rules.

The reduction in the common equity tier I capital ratio, tier I capital ratio and the leverage ratios on March 31, 2016 as compared to December 31, 2015 was mostly due to the complete phase out of the trust preferred securities which at December 31, 2015 allowed approximately $107 million to be included as tier I capital. Total capital ratio was not impacted by the phase out of the trust preferred securities since they qualified as tier 2 capital and therefore included as part of the total capital ratio.

Non-GAAP financial measures

The tangible common equity ratio, tangible assets and tangible book value per common share, which are presented in the table that follows, are non-GAAP measures. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase

137


Table of Contents

accounting method of accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity, total assets or any other measure calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names.

Table 14 provides a reconciliation of total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and total assets to tangible assets as of March 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015.

Table 14—Reconciliation of Tangible Common Equity and Tangible Assets

(In thousands, except share or per share information)

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Total stockholders’ equity

$ 5,250,300 $ 5,105,324

Less: Preferred stock

(50,160 ) (50,160 )

Less: Goodwill

(631,095 ) (626,388 )

Less: Other intangibles

(54,080 ) (58,109 )

Total tangible common equity

$ 4,514,965 $ 4,370,667

Total assets

$ 36,147,009 $ 35,761,733

Less: Goodwill

(631,095 ) (626,388 )

Less: Other intangibles

(54,080 ) (58,109 )

Total tangible assets

$ 35,461,834 $ 35,077,236

Tangible common equity to tangible assets

12.73 % 12.46 %

Common shares outstanding at end of period

103,670,005 103,618,976

Tangible book value per common share

$ 43.55 $ 42.18

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are different than the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These commitments may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position. Other types of off-balance sheet arrangements that the Corporation enters in the ordinary course of business include derivatives, operating leases and provision of guarantees, indemnifications, and representation and warranties. Refer to Note 22 for a detailed discussion related to the Corporation’s obligations under credit recourse and representation and warranties arrangements.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial commitments, which require future cash payments on debt and lease agreements. Also, in the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into contractual arrangements whereby it commits to future purchases of products or services from third parties. Obligations that are legally binding agreements, whereby the Corporation agrees to purchase products or services with a specific minimum quantity defined at a fixed, minimum or variable price over a specified period of time, are defined as purchase obligations.

Purchase obligations include major legal and binding contractual obligations outstanding at March 31, 2016, primarily for services, equipment and real estate construction projects. Services include software licensing and maintenance, facilities maintenance, supplies purchasing, and other goods or services used in the operation of the business. Generally, these contracts are renewable or cancelable at least annually, although in some cases the Corporation has committed to contracts that may extend for several years to secure favorable pricing concessions. Purchase obligations amounted to $192 million at March 31, 2016 of which approximately 70% mature in 2016, 15% in 2017, 7% in 2018 and 8% thereafter.

138


Table of Contents

The Corporation also enters into derivative contracts under which it is required either to receive or pay cash, depending on changes in interest rates. These contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated statement of financial condition with the fair value representing the net present value of the expected future cash receipts and payments based on market rates of interest as of the statement of condition date. The fair value of the contract changes daily as interest rates change. The Corporation may also be required to post additional collateral on margin calls on the derivatives and repurchase transactions.

Refer to Note 18 for a breakdown of long-term borrowings by maturity.

The Corporation utilizes lending-related financial instruments in the normal course of business to accommodate the financial needs of its customers. The Corporation’s exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses credit procedures and policies in making those commitments and conditional obligations as it does in extending loans to customers. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total contractual amounts are not representative of the Corporation’s actual future credit exposure or liquidity requirements for these commitments.

Table 15 presents the contractual amounts related to the Corporation’s off-balance sheet lending and other activities at March 31, 2016.

Table 15—Off-Balance Sheet Lending and Other Activities

Amount of commitment—Expiration Period

(In millions)

Remaining
2016
Years 2017 -
2018
Years 2019 -
2020
Years 2021 -
thereafter
Total

Commitments to extend credit

$ 6,389 $ 990 $ 80 $ 74 $ 7,533

Commercial letters of credit

2 2

Standby letters of credit

21 15 36

Commitments to originate or fund mortgage loans

19 6 25

Unfunded investment obligations

9 9

Total

$ 6,440 $ 1,011 $ 80 $ 74 $ 7,605

At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $10 million for probable losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit. The estimated reserve is principally based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and the application of the corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology. This reserve for unfunded loan commitments remains separate and distinct from the allowance for loan losses and is reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition.

Refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on credit commitments and contingencies.

MARKET RISK

The financial results and capital levels of the Corporation are constantly exposed to market risk. Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements in market rates or financial asset prices, which include interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and bond and equity security prices; the failure to meet financial obligations coming due because of the inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding; and the inability to easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering prices because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions.

While the Corporation is exposed to various business risks, the risks relating to interest rate risk and liquidity are major risks that can materially impact future results of operations and financial condition due to their complexity and dynamic nature.

139


Table of Contents

The Asset Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) and the Corporate Finance Group are responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s market, interest rate risk, funding activities and strategy, and for implementing the policies and procedures

approved by the Corporation’s Risk Management Committee. In addition, the Risk Management Group independently monitors and reports adherence with established market and liquidity policies and recommends actions to enhance and strengthen controls surrounding interest, liquidity, and market risks. The ALCO meets mostly on a weekly basis and reviews the Corporation’s current and forecasted asset and liability levels as well as desired pricing strategies and other relevant financial management and interest rate and risks topics. Also, on a monthly basis the ALCO reviews various interest rate risk sensitivity metrics, ratios and portfolio information, including but not limited to, the Corporation’s liquidity positions, projected sources and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic conditions.

Interest rate risk (“IRR”), a component of market risk, is considered by management as a predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on profitability or market value. Management utilizes various tools to assess IRR, including simulation modeling, static gap analysis, and Economic Value of Equity (“EVE”). The three methodologies complement each other and are used jointly in the evaluation of the Corporation’s IRR. Simulation modeling is prepared for a five year period, which in conjunction with the EVE analysis, provides Management a better view of long term IRR.

Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in net interest income resulting from hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated using a simulation model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by maturity and interest yields or costs. It is performed under a static balance sheet assumption, and the Corporation also runs scenarios that incorporate assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected changes in its composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates, pricing and maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data. It is a dynamic process, emphasizing future performance under diverse economic conditions.

Management assesses interest rate risk by comparing various net interest income simulations under different interest rate scenarios that differ in direction of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. For example, the types of rate scenarios processed during the year included economic most likely scenarios, flat rates, yield curve twists, parallel ramps and parallel shocks. Management also performs analyses to isolate and measure basis and prepayment risk exposures.

The asset and liability management group performs validation procedures on various assumptions used as part of the sensitivity analysis as well as validations of results on a monthly basis. In addition, the model and processes used to assess IRR are subject to third-party validations according to the guidelines established in the Model Governance and Validation policy. Due to the importance of critical assumptions in measuring market risk, the risk models incorporate third-party developed data for critical assumptions such as prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, estimates on the duration of the Corporation’s deposits and interest rate scenarios. These interest rate simulations exclude the impact on loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, whose yields are based on management’s current expectation of future cash flows.

The Corporation processes net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in which the yield curve is assumed to rise and decline instantaneously by the same amount. The rising rate scenarios considered in these market risk simulations reflect parallel changes of 200 and 400 basis points during the twelve-month period ending March 31, 2017. Under a 200 basis points rising rate scenario, 2016 projected net interest income increases by $96 million, while under a 400 basis points rising rate scenario, 2016 projected net interest income increases by $188 million. These scenarios were compared against the Corporation’s flat or unchanged interest rates forecast scenario. Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. Thus, they should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that management could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these forward-looking computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur in the future.

The Corporation estimates the sensitivity of economic value of equity (“EVE”) to changes in interest rates. EVE is equal to the estimated present value of the Corporation’s assets minus the estimated present value of the liabilities. This sensitivity analysis is a useful tool to measure long-term IRR because it captures the impact of up or down rate changes in expected cash flows, including principal and interest, from all future periods.

EVE sensitivity calculated using interest rate shock scenarios is estimated on a quarterly basis. The shock scenarios consist of a +/- 200 and 400 basis point parallel shocks. Management has defined limits for the increases/decreases in EVE sensitivity resulting from the shock scenarios.

140


Table of Contents

The Corporation maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in net interest income or market value that are caused by interest rate volatility. The

market value of these derivatives is subject to interest rate fluctuations and counterparty credit risk adjustments which could have a positive or negative effect in the Corporation’s earnings.

The Corporation’s loan and investment portfolios are subject to prepayment risk, which results from the ability of a third-party to repay debt obligations prior to maturity. Prepayment risk also could have a significant impact on the duration of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, since prepayments could shorten (or lower prepayments could extend) the weighted average life of these portfolios.

Trading

The Corporation engages in trading activities in the ordinary course of business at its subsidiaries, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”) and Popular Securities. Popular Securities’ trading activities consist primarily of market-making activities to meet expected customers’ needs related to its retail securities brokerage business and purchases and sales of U.S. Government and government sponsored securities with the objective of realizing gains from expected short-term price movements. BPPR’s trading activities consist primarily of holding U.S. Government sponsored mortgage-backed securities classified as “trading” and hedging the related market risk with “TBA” (to-be-announced) market transactions. The objective is to derive spread income from the portfolio and not to benefit from short-term market movements. In addition, BPPR uses forward contracts or TBAs to hedge its securitization pipeline. Risks related to variations in interest rates and market volatility is hedged with TBAs that have characteristics similar to that of the forecasted security and its conversion timeline.

At March 31, 2016, the Corporation held trading securities with a fair value of $71 million, representing approximately 0.2% of the Corporation’s total assets, compared with $72 million and 0.2% at December 31, 2015. As shown in Table 16, the trading portfolio consists principally of mortgage-backed securities relating to BPPR’s mortgage activities described above, which at March 31, 2016 were investment grade securities. As of March 31, 2016, the trading portfolio also included $5.7 million in Puerto Rico government obligations and shares of Closed-end funds that invest primarily in Puerto Rico government obligations (December 31, 2015—$6.0 million). Trading instruments are recognized at fair value, with changes resulting from fluctuations in market prices, interest rates or exchange rates reported in current period earnings. The Corporation recognized a net trading account loss of $162 thousand for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 and a trading account gain of $414 thousand for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

Table 16—Trading Portfolio

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

(Dollars in thousands)

Amount Weighted
Average Yield [1]
Amount Weighted
Average Yield [1]

Mortgage-backed securities

$ 52,113 5.07 % $ 51,155 5.22 %

Collateralized mortgage obligations

2,000 5.03 2,054 5.06

Puerto Rico government obligations

4,307 5.41 4,590 5.41

Interest-only strips

663 12.15 687 12.10

Other

12,201 2.03 13,173 3.31

Total

$ 71,284 4.63 % $ 71,659 4.94 %

[1] Not on a taxable equivalent basis.

The Corporation’s trading activities are limited by internal policies. For each of the two subsidiaries, the market risk assumed under trading activities is measured by the 5-day net value-at-risk (“VAR”), with a confidence level of 99%. The VAR measures the maximum estimated loss that may occur over a 5-day holding period, given a 99% probability.

The Corporation’s trading portfolio had a 5-day VAR of approximately $0.5 million for the last week in March 2016. There are numerous assumptions and estimates associated with VAR modeling, and actual results could differ from these assumptions and estimates. Backtesting is performed to compare actual results against maximum estimated losses, in order to evaluate model and assumptions accuracy.

In the opinion of management, the size and composition of the trading portfolio does not represent a significant source of market risk for the Corporation.

141


Table of Contents

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets, available-for-sale securities, derivatives, mortgage servicing rights and contingent consideration. Occasionally, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are collateral dependent and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The fair value of assets and liabilities may include market or credit related adjustments, where appropriate. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, inclusion of credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives resulted in a net gain of $34 thousand recorded in the other operating income and interest expense captions of the consolidated statement of operations, which consisted of a loss of $8 thousand resulting from the Corporation’s own credit standing adjustment and a gain of $42 thousand from the assessment of the counterparties’ credit risk.

The Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value under the three-level hierarchy. The level within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for fair value measurement are observable.

Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporation’s fair value measurement required by the applicable accounting standard. At March 31, 2016, approximately $ 6.7 billion, or 97%, of the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis used market-based or market-derived valuation inputs in their valuation methodology and, therefore, were classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The majority of instruments measured at fair value were classified as Level 2, including U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions, most mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), and derivative instruments.

Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants. Financial assets that were fair valued using broker quotes amounted to $ 16 million at March 31, 2016, of which $ 7 million were Level 3 assets and $ 9 million were Level 2 assets. Level 3 assets consisted principally of tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Fair value for these securities was based on an internally-prepared matrix derived from an average of two indicative local broker quotes. The main input used in the matrix pricing was non-binding local broker quotes obtained from limited trade activity. Therefore, these securities were classified as Level 3.

Refer to Note 34 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2015 Form 10-K for a description of the Corporation’s valuation methodologies used for the assets and liabilities measured at fair value. Also, refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates in the 2015 Form 10-K for additional information on the accounting guidance and the Corporation’s policies or procedures related to fair value measurements.

Inputs are evaluated to ascertain that they consider current market conditions, including the relative liquidity of the market. When a market quote for a specific security is not available, the pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument, such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent trading data is not available, the pricing service provider relies on specific information including dialogue with brokers, buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established benchmarks and transactions on similar securities, to draw correlations based on the characteristics of the evaluated instrument. If for any reason the pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it discontinues pricing the instrument. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, none of the Corporation’s investment securities were subject to pricing discontinuance by the pricing service providers. The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing service providers is concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement guidance. In addition, during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Corporation did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing service providers or broker dealers for its trading account securities and investment securities available-for-sale.

Furthermore, management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of investment securities at least on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses that may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any guarantees.

142


Table of Contents

Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics and market liquidity. At the end of each period, management assesses the fair value hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. The fair value measurement analysis performed by the Corporation includes validation procedures with alternate pricing sources when available and review of market changes, pricing methodology, assumption and level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions. Management has established materiality thresholds according to the investment class to monitor and investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the primary pricing service provider and the secondary pricing source used as support for the valuation results.

LIQUIDITY

The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation has sufficient liquidity to meet all of its financial obligations, finance expected future growth and maintain a reasonable safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed market conditions. The Board is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s tolerance for liquidity risk, including approving relevant risk limits and policies. The Board has delegated the monitoring of these risks to the RMC and the ALCO. The management of liquidity risk, on a long-term and day-to-day basis, is the responsibility of the Corporate Treasury Division. The Corporation’s Corporate Treasurer is responsible for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Board and for monitoring the Corporation’s liquidity position on an ongoing basis. Also, the Corporate Treasury Division coordinates corporate wide liquidity management strategies and activities with the reportable segments, oversees policy breaches and manages the escalation process. The Financial and Operational Risk Management Division is responsible for the independent monitoring and reporting of adherence with established policies.

An institution’s liquidity may be pressured if, for example, its credit rating is downgraded, it experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow, or some other event causes counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook, adverse ratings of its principal markets and regulatory changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding.

Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. It is also managed at the level of the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The Corporation has adopted policies and limits to monitor more effectively the Corporation’s liquidity position and that of the banking subsidiaries. Additionally, contingency funding plans are used to model various stress events of different magnitudes and affecting different time horizons that assist management in evaluating the size of the liquidity buffers needed if those stress events occur. However, such models may not predict accurately how the market and customers might react to every event, and are dependent on many assumptions.

A cash dividend of $0.15 per share was paid on April 1, 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 11, 2016. This represents a quarterly payout of approximately $15.5 million.

As discussed in Note 5—Business Combinations, on February 27, 2015 the Corporation acquired certain assets and all deposits (except brokered deposits) from Doral Bank. This included approximately $ 1.5 billion in loans, approximately $ 173 million in securities available for sale and $ 2.2 billion in deposits.

Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered deposits and public funds deposits, continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, funding 76% of the Corporation’s total assets at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The ratio of total ending loans to deposits was 84% at March 31, 2016, compared to 85% at December 31, 2015. In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. At March 31, 2016, these borrowings consisted primarily of $ 710 million in assets sold under agreement to repurchase, $682 million in advances with the FHLB, $439 million in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (net of debt issuance cost) related to trust preferred securities and $ 443 million in term notes (net of debt issuance cost) issued to partially fund the repayment of TARP funds. A detailed description of the Corporation’s borrowings, including their terms, is included in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements provide information on the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows.

The following sections provide further information on the Corporation’s major funding activities and needs, as well as the risks involved in these activities. A detailed description of the Corporation’s borrowings and available lines of credit, including its terms, is included in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements provide information on the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows.

143


Table of Contents

Banking Subsidiaries

Primary sources of funding for the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or “the banking subsidiaries,” include retail and commercial deposits, brokered deposits, unpledged investment securities, and, to a lesser extent, loan sales. In addition, the Corporation maintains borrowing facilities with the FHLB and at the discount window of the Fed, and has a considerable amount of collateral pledged that can be used to quickly raise funds under these facilities.

The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan originations, investment portfolio purchases, loan purchases and repurchases, repayment of outstanding obligations (including deposits), and operational expenses. Also, the banking subsidiaries assume liquidity risk related to collateral posting requirements for certain activities mainly in connection with contractual commitments, recourse provisions, servicing advances, derivatives, credit card licensing agreements and support to several mutual funds administered by BPPR.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, BPPR declared a cash dividend of $19.7 million, a portion of which was used by Popular, Inc. for the payment of the cash dividend on its outstanding common stock made on April 1, 2016, as mentioned above.

Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements provides a consolidating statement of cash flows which includes the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries as part of the “All other subsidiaries and eliminations” column.

The banking subsidiaries maintain sufficient funding capacity to address large increases in funding requirements such as deposit outflows. This capacity is comprised mainly of available liquidity derived from secured funding sources, as well as on-balance sheet liquidity in the form of cash balances maintained at the Fed and unused secured lines held at the Fed and FHLB, in addition to liquid unpledged securities. The Corporation has established liquidity guidelines that require the banking subsidiaries to have sufficient liquidity to cover all short-term borrowings and a portion of deposits.

The Corporation’s ability to compete successfully in the marketplace for deposits, excluding brokered deposits, depends on various factors, including pricing, service, convenience and financial stability as reflected by operating results, credit ratings (by nationally recognized credit rating agencies), and importantly, FDIC deposit insurance. Although a downgrade in the credit ratings of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries may impact their ability to raise retail and commercial deposits or the rate that it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact should be material. Deposits at all of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries are federally insured (subject to FDIC limits) and this is expected to mitigate the potential effect of a downgrade in the credit ratings.

Deposits are a key source of funding as they tend to be less volatile than institutional borrowings and their cost is less sensitive to changes in market rates. Refer to Table 12 for a breakdown of deposits by major types. Core deposits are generated from a large base of consumer, corporate and institutional customers. Core deposits include all non-interest bearing deposits, savings deposits and certificates of deposit under $100,000, excluding brokered deposits with denominations under $100,000. Core deposits have historically provided the Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. Core deposits totaled $ 22.7 billion, or 82% of total deposits, at March 31, 2016, compared with $22.0 billion, or 81% of total deposits, at December 31, 2015. Core deposits financed 70 % of the Corporation’s earning assets at March 31, 2016, compared with 69% at December 31, 2015.

Certificates of deposit with denominations of $100,000 and over at March 31, 2016 totaled $4.1 billion, or 15% of total deposits (December 31, 2015—$4.2 billion, or 15% of total deposits). Their distribution by maturity at March 31, 2016 is presented in the table that follows:

Table 17—Distribution by Maturity of Certificate of Deposits of $100,000 and Over

(In thousands)

3 months or less

$ 1,528,149

3 to 6 months

485,079

6 to 12 months

753,089

Over 12 months

1,313,418

Total

$ 4,079,735

At March 31, 2016 approximately 3 % of the Corporation’s assets were financed by brokered deposits, as compared to 4% at December 31, 2015. The Corporation had $ 0.9 billion in brokered deposits at March 31, 2016, compared with $1.3 billion at December 31, 2015. In the event that any of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries’ regulatory capital ratios fall below those

144


Table of Contents

required by a well-capitalized institution or are subject to capital restrictions by the regulators, that banking subsidiary faces the risk of not being able to raise or maintain brokered deposits and faces limitations on the rate paid on deposits, which may hinder the Corporation’s ability to effectively compete in its retail markets and could affect its deposit raising efforts.

To the extent that the banking subsidiaries are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, the Corporation may meet its liquidity needs through short-term borrowings by pledging securities for borrowings under repurchase agreements, by pledging additional loans and securities through the available secured lending facilities, or by selling liquid assets. These measures are subject to availability of collateral.

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the banking subsidiaries had credit facilities authorized with the FHLB aggregating to $4.1 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively, based on assets pledged with the FHLB at those dates. Outstanding borrowings under these credit facilities totaled $682 million at March 31, 2016 and $762 million at December 31, 2015. Such advances are collateralized by loans held-in-portfolio, do not have restrictive covenants and do not have any callable features. At March 31, 2016 the credit facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $5.0 billion in loans held-in-portfolio, compared with $4.7 billion at December 31, 2015. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the terms of FHLB advances outstanding.

At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Corporation’s borrowing capacity at the Fed’s Discount Window amounted to approximately $1.3 billion which remained unused as of both dates. This facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under difficult market conditions. The amount available under this borrowing facility is dependent upon the balance of performing loans, securities pledged as collateral and the haircuts assigned to such collateral. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, this credit facility with the Fed was collateralized by $2.5 billion in loans held-in-portfolio.

At March 31, 2016, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient current and projected liquidity sources to meet their anticipated cash flow obligations, as well as special needs and off-balance sheet commitments, in the ordinary course of business and have sufficient liquidity resources to address a stress event. Although the banking subsidiaries have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that they would be able to replace those funds in the future if the Corporation’s financial condition or general market conditions were to deteriorate. The Corporation’s financial flexibility will be severely constrained if its banking subsidiaries are unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future financing needs at acceptable interest rates. The banking subsidiaries also are required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of market changes, the Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity. Finally, if management is required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to meet its future growth, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected.

Westernbank FDIC-assisted Transaction and Impact on Liquidity

The effects of the loss sharing agreements on cash flows and operating results will depend primarily on the ability of the borrowers whose loans are covered by the loss sharing agreements to make payments over time and our ability to receive reimbursements for losses from the FDIC. As the loss sharing agreements are in effect for a period of ten years for one-to-four family loans and five years for commercial, construction and consumer loans (with periods commencing on April 30, 2010), changing economic conditions will likely impact the timing of future charge-offs and the resulting reimbursements from the FDIC. Management believes that any recapture of interest income and recognition of cash flows from the borrowers or received from the FDIC on the claims filed may be recognized unevenly over this period, as management exhausts its collection efforts under the Corporation’s normal practices.

BPPR’s liquidity may also be impacted by the loan payment performance and timing of claims made and receipt of reimbursements under the FDIC loss sharing agreements. Please refer to the Legal Proceedings section of Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements and to Part II, Item 1A- Risk factors herein for a discussion of the settlement of a contractual dispute between BPPR and the FDIC which has impacted the timing of the payment of claims under the loss share agreements.

Bank Holding Companies

The principal sources of funding for the holding companies include cash on hand, investment securities, dividends received from banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory limits and authorizations) asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries and proceeds from potential securities offerings.

145


Table of Contents

The principal use of these funds include the repayment of debt, and interest payments to holders of senior debt and junior subordinated deferrable interest (related to trust preferred securities) and capitalizing its banking subsidiaries.

During quarter ended March 31, 2016, PIHC received $19.7 million in dividends from BPPR and $ 1.2 million in dividends from EVERTEC’s parent company. PIHC also received $10.0 million in dividends from its non-banking subsidiaries.

Another use of liquidity at the parent holding company is the payment of dividends on its outstanding stock. A cash dividend of $0.15 per share was paid on April 1, 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 11, 2016. This represents a quarterly payout of approximately $15.5 million. The dividends for the Corporation’s Series A and Series B preferred stock amounted to $0.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016.

The BHC’s have in the past borrowed in the money markets and in the corporate debt market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries, however, the cash needs of the Corporation’s non-banking subsidiaries other than to repay indebtedness and interest are now minimal. These sources of funding have become more costly due to the reductions in the Corporation’s credit ratings. The Corporation’s principal credit ratings are below “investment grade” which affects the Corporation’s ability to raise funds in the capital markets. The Corporation has an automatic shelf registration statement filed and effective with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which permits the Corporation to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity securities.

Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements provides a statement of condition, of operations and of cash flows for the two BHC’s. The loans held-in-portfolio in such financial statements is principally associated with intercompany transactions.

The outstanding balance of notes payable at the BHC’s amounted to $883 million at March 31, 2016 and $882 million at December 31, 2015, net of debt issuance cost. The repayment of the BHC’s obligations represents a potential cash need which is expected to be met with a combination of internal liquidity resources stemming mainly from future dividend receipts and new borrowings.

The contractual maturities of the BHC’s notes payable at March 31, 2016 are presented in Table 18.

Table 18 —Distribution of BHC’s Notes Payable by Contractual Maturity

Year

(In thousands)

2016

$

2017

2018

2019

443,224

2020

Later years

439,304

Total

$ 882,528

As indicated previously, the BHC did not issue new registered debt in the capital markets during the quarter ended March 31, 2016.

The BHCs liquidity position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand, investments and other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs obligations during the foreseeable future.

Non-banking subsidiaries

The principal sources of funding for the non-banking subsidiaries include internally generated cash flows from operations, loan sales, repurchase agreements, and borrowed funds from their direct parent companies or the holding companies. The principal uses of funds for the non-banking subsidiaries include repayment of maturing debt, operational expenses and payment of dividends to the BHCs. The liquidity needs of the non-banking subsidiaries are minimal since most of them are funded internally from operating cash flows or from intercompany borrowings from their holding companies, BPPR or BPNA.

Other Funding Sources and Capital

The investment securities portfolio provides an additional source of liquidity, which may be realized through either securities sales or repurchase agreements. The Corporation’s investment securities portfolio consists primarily of liquid U.S. government investment securities, sponsored U.S. agency securities, government sponsored mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations that can be used to raise funds in the repo markets. The availability of the repurchase agreement would be subject to having sufficient unpledged collateral available at the time the transactions are to be consummated, in addition to overall liquidity

146


Table of Contents

and risk appetite of the various counterparties. The Corporation’s unpledged investment and trading securities, excluding other investment securities, amounted to $3.8 billion at March 31, 2016 and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2015. A substantial portion of these securities could be used to raise financing quickly in the U.S. money markets or from secured lending sources.

Additional liquidity may be provided through loan maturities, prepayments and sales. The loan portfolio can also be used to obtain funding in the capital markets. In particular, mortgage loans and some types of consumer loans, have secondary markets which the Corporation could use.

Risks to Liquidity

Total lines of credit outstanding are not necessarily a measure of the total credit available on a continuing basis. Some of these lines could be subject to collateral requirements, standards of creditworthiness, leverage ratios and other regulatory requirements, among other factors. Derivatives, such as those embedded in long-term repurchase transactions or interest rate swaps, and off-balance sheet exposures, such as recourse, performance bonds or credit card arrangements, are subject to collateral requirements. As their fair value increases, the collateral requirements may increase, thereby reducing the balance of unpledged securities.

The importance of the Puerto Rico market for the Corporation is an additional risk factor that could affect its financing activities. In the case of a deterioration in economic conditions in Puerto Rico, the credit quality of the Corporation could be affected and result in higher credit costs. The Puerto Rico economy continues to face various challenges, including significant pressures in some sectors of the residential real estate market. Refer to the Geographic and Government Risk section of this MD&A for some highlights on the current status of the Puerto Rico economy.

Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook and credit ratings of its principal markets and regulatory changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to prepare for the possibility of such scenario, management has adopted contingency plans for raising financing under stress scenarios when important sources of funds that are usually fully available are temporarily unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms, such as the pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in place with the FHLB and the Fed.

The credit ratings of Popular’s debt obligations are a relevant factor for liquidity because they impact the Corporation’s ability to borrow in the capital markets, its cost and access to funding sources. Credit ratings are based on the financial strength, credit quality and concentrations in the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital adequacy, the quality of management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core retail and commercial deposits, and the Corporation’s ability to access a broad array of wholesale funding sources, among other factors.

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have historically not used unsecured capital market borrowings to finance its operations, and therefore are less sensitive to the level and changes in the Corporation’s overall credit ratings. At the BHCs, the volume of capital market borrowings has declined substantially, as the non-banking lending businesses that it had historically funded have been shut down and the need to raise unsecured senior debt has been substantially reduced.

Obligations Subject to Rating Triggers or Collateral Requirements

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated by the major rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and secured borrowings. The banking subsidiaries had $20 million in deposits at March 31, 2016 that are subject to rating triggers.

Some of the Corporation’s derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the bank’s well-capitalized status and certain formal regulatory actions. These agreements could require exposure collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $3 million at March 31, 2016, with the Corporation providing collateral totaling $10 million to cover the net liability position with counterparties on these derivative instruments.

In addition, certain mortgage servicing and custodial agreements that BPPR has with third parties include rating covenants. In the event of a credit rating downgrade, the third parties have the right to require the institution to engage a substitute cash custodian for escrow deposits and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Also, as discussed in Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation services residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain contractual agreements require the Corporation to post collateral to secure such recourse obligations if the institution’s required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by the Corporation to secure recourse obligations amounted to approximately $76 million at March 31, 2016. The Corporation could be required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management expects that it would be able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The requirements to post collateral under certain agreements or the loss of escrow deposits could reduce the Corporation’s liquidity resources and impact its operating results.

147


Table of Contents

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND LOAN QUALITY

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets include primarily past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest, renegotiated loans, and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table 19.

On June 30, 2015, the shared-loss arrangement under the commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC related to the loans acquired from Westernbank as part of the FDIC assisted transaction in 2010 expired. Loans and OREO’s that remain covered under the terms of the single-family loss share agreement continue to be presented as covered assets in the accompanying tables and credit metrics as of March 31, 2016.

Because of the application of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to the Westernbank acquired loans and the loss protection provided by the FDIC which limits the risks on the covered loans, the Corporation has determined to provide certain quality metrics in this MD&A that exclude such covered loans to facilitate the comparison between loan portfolios and across periods. The Corporation believes the inclusion of these loans in certain asset quality ratios in the numerator or denominator (or both) would result in a distortion to these ratios. In addition, because charge-offs related to the acquired loans are recorded against the non-accretable balance, the net charge-off ratio including the acquired loans is lower for the single-family loan portfolios which includes covered loans. The inclusion of these loans in the asset quality ratios could result in a lack of comparability across periods, and could negatively impact comparability with other portfolios that were not impacted by acquisition accounting. The Corporation believes that the presentation of asset quality measures, excluding covered loans and related amounts from both the numerator and denominator, provides a better perspective into underlying trends related to the quality of its loan portfolio.

Despite challenging economic and fiscal conditions in Puerto Rico, non-performing assets remained stable during the first quarter of 2016. Total non-performing assets, including covered assets, were $848 million at March 31, 2016, increasing by $5 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2015, of which $11 million were related to higher BPPR residential OREOs. Non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio decreased by $2 million when compared to December 31, 2015, mainly driven by lower mortgage non-performing loans of $17 million, offset by higher commercial non-performing loans of $16 million. Mortgage decrease was mostly driven by improvements in the BPPR mortgage portfolio due to the improved collection efforts. This decrease was offset in part by an increase in commercial NPLs driven by a single $11 million borrower in the BPNA segment. At March 31, 2016, NPLs to total loans held-in-portfolio remained flat at 2.7% from December 31, 2015.

At March 31, 2016, non-performing loans secured by real estate held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $495 million in the Puerto Rico operations and $33 million in the U.S. operations. These figures compare to $504 million in the Puerto Rico operations and $22 million in the U.S. operations at December 31, 2015. In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table 19, at March 31, 2016, there were $162 million of non-covered performing loans, mostly commercial loans, which in management’s opinion, are currently subject to potential future classification as non-performing and are considered impaired, compared with $160 million at December 31, 2015.

148


Table of Contents

Table 19—Non-Performing Assets

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31,
2016
As a % of loans
HIP by
category [4]
December 31,
2015
As a % of loans
HIP by
category [4]

Commercial

$ 197,631 1.9 % $ 181,816 1.8 %

Construction

3,941 0.5 3,550 0.5

Legacy [1]

4,046 6.6 3,649 5.7

Leasing

3,419 0.5 3,009 0.5

Mortgage

334,907 4.8 351,471 5.0

Consumer

55,582 1.4 58,304 1.5

Total non-performing loans held-in- portfolio, excluding covered loans

599,526 2.7 % 601,799 2.7 %

Non-performing loans held-for-sale [2]

42,743 45,169

Other real estate owned (“OREO”), excluding covered OREO

165,960 155,231

Total non-performing assets, excluding covered assets

$ 808,229 $ 802,199

Covered loans and OREO [3]

39,916 40,571

Total non-performing assets

$ 848,145 $ 842,770

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more [5] [6]

$ 426,437 $ 446,725

Ratios excluding covered loans: [7]

Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-in-portfolio

2.66 % 2.69 %

Allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio

2.26 2.25

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans, excluding held-for-sale

84.80 83.57

Ratios including covered loans:

Non-performing assets to total assets

2.35 % 2.36 %

Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-in-portfolio

2.61 2.63

Allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio

2.33 2.34

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans, excluding held-for-sale

89.29 88.68

HIP = “held-in-portfolio”

[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.
[2] Non-performing loans held-for-sale consist $42.7 million in commercial loans and $2 thousand in construction loans as of March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$45 million in commercial loans and $95 thousand in construction loans).
[3] The amount consists of $4 million in non-performing covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and $36 million in covered OREO as of March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$4 million and $37 million, respectively). It excludes covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses.
[4] Loans held-in-portfolio used in the computation exclude $625 million in covered loans at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$646 million).
[5] The carrying value of loans accounted for under ASC Sub-topic 310-30 that are contractually 90 days or more past due was $364 million at March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$349 million). This amount is excluded from the above table as the loans’ accretable yield interest recognition is independent from the underlying contractual loan delinquency status.
[6] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $161 million of residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of March 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015—$164 million). Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $68 million in reverse mortgage loans which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets (December 31, 2015—$70 million).
[7] These asset quality ratios have been adjusted to remove the impact of covered loans and covered foreclosed property. Appropriate adjustments to the numerator and denominator have been reflected in the calculation of these ratios. Management believes the inclusion of acquired loans in certain asset quality ratios that include non-performing assets, past due loans or net charge-offs in the numerator and denominator results in distortions of these ratios and they may not be comparable to other periods presented or to other portfolios that were not impacted by purchase accounting.

149


Table of Contents

Table 20—Activity in Non-Performing Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Consumer and Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

Beginning balance

$ 519,385 $ 21,101 $ 540,486

Plus:

New non-performing loans

100,543 23,259 123,802

Advances on existing non-performing loans

3 3

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(10,633 ) (10,633 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(15,948 ) (657 ) (16,605 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(84,600 ) (11,928 ) (96,528 )

Ending balance NPLs

$ 508,747 $ 31,778 $ 540,525

Table 21—Activity in Non-Performing Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Consumer and Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

Beginning balance

$ 567,351 $ 13,144 $ 580,495

Plus:

New non-performing loans

135,267 15,262 150,529

Advances on existing non-performing loans

33 33

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(5,914 ) (5,914 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(16,533 ) (690 ) (17,223 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(82,172 ) (9,231 ) (91,403 )

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

2,038 2,038

Ending balance NPLs

$ 597,999 $ 20,556 $ 618,555

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, total non-performing loan inflows, excluding consumer loans, decreased by $27 million, or 18%, when compared to the inflows for the same quarter in 2015. Inflows of non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment decreased by $35 million, or 26%, compared to the inflows for the first quarter of 2015, mostly related to lower mortgage inflows of $29 million in the BPPR segment. Refer to Tables 20 and 21 for more information in the non-performing loans activity for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Refer to Table 22 for a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

150


Table of Contents

Table 22—Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics—Quarterly Activity

Quarters ended March 31,
2016 2016 2016 2015 2015 2015

(Dollars in thousands)

Non-covered
loans
Covered
loans
Total Non-covered
loans
Covered
loans
Total

Balance at beginning of period

$ 502,935 $ 34,176 $ 537,111 $ 519,719 $ 82,073 $ 601,792

Provision (reversal) for loan losses

47,940 (3,105 ) 44,835 29,711 10,324 40,035

550,875 31,071 581,946 549,430 92,397 641,827

Charged-offs:

Commercial

9,463 9,463 10,022 14,239 24,261

Construction

544 544 9,046 9,046

Leases

2,127 2,127 1,237 1,237

Legacy [1]

109 109 474 474

Mortgage

16,413 1,221 17,634 11,194 3,385 14,579

Consumer

30,027 33 30,060 32,217 32,217

58,683 1,254 59,937 55,144 26,670 81,814

Recoveries:

Commercial

6,554 6,554 5,699 2,640 8,339

Construction

233 233 2,925 3,275 6,200

Leases

489 489 468 468

Legacy [1]

356 356 2,302 2,302

Mortgage

1,487 225 1,712 567 104 671

Consumer

7,116 3 7,119 7,297 727 8,024

16,235 228 16,463 19,258 6,746 26,004

Net loans charged-offs (recovered):

Commercial

2,909 2,909 4,323 11,599 15,922

Construction

311 311 (2,925 ) 5,771 2,846

Leases

1,638 1,638 769 769

Legacy [1]

(247 ) (247 ) (1,828 ) (1,828 )

Mortgage

14,926 996 15,922 10,627 3,281 13,908

Consumer

22,911 30 22,941 24,920 (727 ) 24,193

42,448 1,026 43,474 35,886 19,924 55,810

Net recoveries (write-downs)

2,680 2,680

Balance at end of period

$ 508,427 $ 30,045 $ 538,472 $ 516,224 $ 72,473 $ 588,697

Ratios:

Annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio [2]

0.76 % 0.76 % 0.72 % 1.00 %

Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs [2]

1.13 x 1.03 x 0.83 x 0.72 x

[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.
[2] Excluding provision for loan losses and net write-down related to loans sold during the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

Refer to the “Allowance for Loan Losses” subsection in this MD&A for tables detailing the composition of the allowance for loan losses between general and specific reserves, and for qualitative information on the main factors driving the variances.

The following table presents annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio (“HIP”) for the non-covered portfolio by loan category for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

151


Table of Contents

Table 23 —Annualized Net Charge-offs (Recoveries) to Average Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Non-Covered Loans)

Quarters ended
March 31,
2016 2015

Commercial

0.11 % 0.21 %

Construction

0.18 (2.79 )

Leases

1.04 0.54

Legacy

(1.57 ) (9.23 )

Mortgage

0.87 0.64

Consumer

2.40 2.59

Total annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio

0.76 % 0.72 %

Net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, increased by $6.6 million when compared to the first quarter of 2015, mainly reflective of higher mortgage net charge-offs in the BPPR segment.

The Corporation continued to exhibit a stable credit performance despite a challenging operating environment in Puerto Rico, reflective of the improved risk profile of the loan portfolios. The Corporation continues to be attentive to changes in credit quality trends and is focused in taking measures to minimize risks. The U.S. operation continued to reflect strong credit quality with low level of charge-offs and non-performing loans.

The discussions in the sections that follow assess credit quality performance for the first quarter of 2016 for most of the Corporation’s non-covered loan portfolios.

Commercial loans

Non-covered non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio increased by $16 million, or 9%, from December 31, 2015, mainly driven by a single $11 million relationship in the BPNA segment which impacted the results for the quarter. The percentage of non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio to commercial loans held-in-portfolio increased to 1.93% at March 31, 2016 from 1.80% at December 31, 2015.

Tables 24 and 25 present the changes in the non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and BPNA segments. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, inflows of commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment decreased by $6 million, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2015. Inflows of commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment increased by $7 million, compared to inflows for the same quarter in 2015, driven by the abovementioned $11 million relationship.

Table 24—Activity in Non-Performing Commercial Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

Beginning Balance—NPLs

$ 177,902 $ 3,914 $ 181,816

Plus:

New non-performing loans

21,657 15,064 36,721

Advances on existing non-performing loans

1 1

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(1,103 ) (1,103 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(4,949 ) (381 ) (5,330 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(10,868 ) (3,606 ) (14,474 )

Ending balance—NPLs

$ 182,639 $ 14,992 $ 197,631

152


Table of Contents

Table 25—Activity in Non-Performing Commercial Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

Beginning Balance—NPLs

$ 257,910 $ 2,315 $ 260,225

Plus:

New non-performing loans [1]

27,426 8,030 35,456

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(1,069 ) (1,069 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(8,375 ) (426 ) (8,801 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(11,261 ) (112 ) (11,373 )

Ending balance—NPLs

$ 264,631 $ 9,807 $ 274,438

[1] New non-performing loans includes $1.2 million at BPPR and $7.4 million at BPNA from Doral Acquisition.

There are two commercial loan relationships greater than $ 10 million in non-accrual status at March 31, 2016 and one relationship at December 31, 2015, with an outstanding aggregate balance of $45 million and $36 million, respectively.

Commercial loan net charge-offs, excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, decreased by $1.4 million, when compared to the same period in 2015. This decrease was mostly driven by lower net charge-offs in the BPPR segment of $2.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, when compared with the same period in 2015. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the charge-offs associated with collateral dependent impaired commercial loans amounted to approximately $1.3 million at the BPPR segment. The BPNA segment continued to show low levels of charge-offs reflective of improvements in credit quality.

The Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio secured by real estate (“CRE”), excluding covered loans, amounted to $6.7 billion at March 31, 2016, of which $2.1 billion was secured with owner occupied properties, compared with $6.6 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2015. CRE non-performing loans, excluding covered loans, amounted to $156 million at March 31, 2016, compared with $142 million at December 31, 2015. Increase was driven by the $11 million relationship in the BPNA segment. The CRE non-performing loans ratios for the BPPR and BPNA segments were 3.07% and 0.59%, respectively, at March 31, 2016, compared with 3.00% and 0.03%, respectively, at December 31, 2015.

Table 26—Non-Performing Commercial Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015

Non-performing commercial loans

$ 182,639 $ 177,902 $ 14,992 $ 3,914 $ 197,631 $ 181,816

Non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans HIP

2.48 % 2.41 % 0.52 % 0.14 % 1.93 % 1.80 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the quarters ended For the quarters ended For the quarters ended

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015

Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries)

$ 2,704 $ 4,802 $ 205 $ (479 ) $ 2,909 $ 4,323

Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries)

(annualized) to average commercial loans HIP

0.15 % 0.30 % 0.03 % (0.10 )% 0.11 % 0.21 %

153


Table of Contents

Construction loans

Non-covered non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio increased by $391 thousand when compared with December 31, 2015, mostly concentrated in the BPPR segment. Stable credit trends in the construction portfolio are the result of de-risking strategies executed by the Corporation over the past several years. The ratio of non-performing construction loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, increased to 0.54% at March 31, 2016 from 0.52% at December 31, 2015.

Tables 27 and 28 present changes in non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and BPNA segments.

Table 27—Activity in Non-Performing Construction Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

Beginning Balance—NPLs

$ 3,550 $ $ 3,550

Plus:

New non-performing loans

207 671 878

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(304 ) (304 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(110 ) (110 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(73 ) (73 )

Ending balance—NPLs

$ 3,270 $ 671 $ 3,941

Table 28—Activity in Non-Performing Construction Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

Beginning Balance—NPLs

$ 13,812 $ $ 13,812

Plus:

New non-performing loans

456 456

Less:

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(1,054 ) (1,054 )

Ending balance—NPLs

$ 13,214 $ $ 13,214

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries), excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, amounted to $311 thousand for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, compared to recoveries of $2.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, charge-offs associated with collateral dependent impaired construction loans were $110 thousand in the BPPR segment and none in the BPNA segment.

Table 29 provides information on construction non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR and BPNA (excluding the covered loan portfolio) segments.

154


Table of Contents

Table 29—Non-Performing Construction Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015

Non-performing construction loans

$ 3,270 $ 3,550 $ 671 $ $ 3,941 $ 3,550

Non-performing construction loans to construction loans HIP

3.11 % 3.52 % 0.11 % % 0.54 % 0.52 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the quarters ended For the quarters ended For the quarters ended

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries)

$ 311 $ (2,925 ) $ $ $ 311 $ (2,925 )

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries)

(annualized) to average construction loans HIP

1.13 % (7.76 )% % % 0.18 % (2.79 )%

Mortgage loans

Non-covered non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio decreased by $17 million from December 31, 2015, driven by improvements in the BPPR segment, reflective of the improved risk profile of the portfolio, as well as aggressive loss mitigation and collection efforts.

The percentage of non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio to mortgage loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 4.80% at March 31, 2016 from 5.00% at December 31, 2015. Tables 30 and 31 present changes in non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and BPNA segments.

Table 30—Activity in Non-Performing Mortgage Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

Beginning balance—NPLs

$ 337,933 $ 13,538 $ 351,471

Plus:

New non-performing loans

78,679 6,920 85,599

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(9,226 ) (9,226 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(10,889 ) (276 ) (11,165 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(73,659 ) (8,113 ) (81,772 )

Ending balance—NPLs

$ 322,838 $ 12,069 $ 334,907

155


Table of Contents

Table 31—Activity in Non-Performing Mortgage Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015

(Dollars in thousands)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

Beginning balance—NPLs

$ 295,629 $ 9,284 $ 304,913

Plus:

New non-performing loans [1]

107,385 6,232 113,617

Less:

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

(4,845 ) (4,845 )

Non-performing loans charged-off

(8,158 ) (123 ) (8,281 )

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

(69,857 ) (8,970 ) (78,827 )

Loans in accrual status transferred to held-for-sale

2,038 2,038

Ending balance—NPLs

$ 320,154 $ 8,461 $ 328,615

[1] New non-performing loans includes $16.6 million of loans previous serviced by Doral.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, inflows of mortgage non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment decreased by $29 million, or 27%, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2015. The first quarter of 2015 included the addition of $17 million of loans previously guaranteed by Doral Bank under servicing agreement that required Doral to advance principal and interest payments irrespective of borrower delinquencies. Excluding this impact, mortgage inflows decreased by $12 million when compared to the first quarter of 2015. Inflows of mortgage non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment increased by $688 thousand when compared to inflows for the same period in 2015.

Mortgage loan net charge-offs, excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, increased by $4.3 million when compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2015. Net charge-off activity derived mainly from loans in the BPPR segment. The net charge-offs in the BPNA segment continued at low levels, reflective of the improved risk profile of the portfolio, strengthened by the sale of certain non-performing and classified assets during the year 2014. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, charge-offs associated with mortgage loans individually evaluated for impairment amounted to $3.4 million in the BPPR segment.

Table 32 provides information on mortgage non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR and BPNA segments (excluding the covered loan portfolio).

Table 32—Non-Performing Mortgage Loans and Net Charge-Offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015

Non-performing mortgage loans

$ 322,838 $ 337,933 $ 12,069 $ 13,538 $ 334,907 $ 351,471

Non-performing mortgage loans to mortgage loans HIP

5.29 % 5.52 % 1.37 % 1.49 % 4.80 % 5.00 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the quarters ended For the quarters ended For the quarters ended

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015

Mortgage loan net charge-offs

$ 14,696 $ 10,473 $ 230 $ 154 $ 14,926 $ 10,627

Mortgage loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average mortgage loans HIP

0.98 % 0.75 % 0.10 % 0.06 % 0.87 % 0.64 %

Consumer loans

Non-covered non-performing consumer loans held-in-portfolio decreased by $3 million when compared to December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of a decrease of $3 million in the BPPR segment, mainly related to personal loans.

156


Table of Contents

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the BPPR segment inflows of consumer non-performing loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $23 million, flat when compared to inflows for the same period of 2015. Inflows of consumer non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment remained flat at $4 million, when compared to inflows for the same period of 2015.

The Corporation’s consumer net charge-offs decreased by $2 million, when compared with the same period of 2015. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, charge-offs associated with consumer loans individually evaluated for impairment amounted to $3.5 million in the BPPR segment.

Table 33 provides information on consumer non-performing loans and net charge-offs by segments.

Table 33—Non-Performing Consumer Loans and Net Charge-Offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
December 31,
2015

Non-performing consumer loans

$ 49,446 $ 52,440 $ 6,136 $ 5,864 $ 55,582 $ 58,304

Non-performing consumer loans to consumer loans HIP

1.49 % 1.57 % 1.11 % 1.19 % 1.44 % 1.52 %
BPPR BPNA Popular, Inc.
For the quarters ended For the quarters ended For the quarters ended

(Dollars in thousands)

March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015
March 31,
2016
March 31,
2015

Consumer loan net charge-offs

$ 21,298 $ 23,653 $ 1,613 $ 1,267 $ 22,911 $ 24,920

Consumer loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average consumer loans HIP

2.57 % 2.81 % 1.28 % 1.07 % 2.40 % 2.59 %

Troubled debt restructurings

The Corporation’s TDR loans, excluding covered loans, increased by $29 million, or 2%, from December 31, 2015. TDRs in accruing status increased by $39 million from December 31, 2015, due to sustained borrower performance, while non-accruing TDRs decreased by $11 million.

At March 31, 2016, commercial loan TDRs, excluding covered loans, for the BPPR segment amounted to $258 million of which $88 million were in non-performing status. This compares with $255 million, of which $88 million were in non-performing status at December 31, 2015.

At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, construction loan TDRs, excluding covered loans, for the BPPR segment amounted to $2 million, which were in non-performing status.

At March 31, 2016, the mortgage loan TDRs for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $793 million (including $ 376 million guaranteed by U.S. sponsored entities) and $8 million, respectively, of which $119 million and $2 million, respectively, were in non-performing status. This compares with $768 million (including $359 million guaranteed by U.S. sponsored entities) and $7 million, respectively, of which $128 million and $2 million were in non-performing status at December 31, 2015.

At March 31, 2016, the consumer loan TDRs for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $114 million and $2 million, respectively, of which $12 million and $255 thousand, respectively, were in non-performing status, compared with $115 million and $2 million, respectively, of which $12 million and $239 thousand, respectively, were in non-performing status at December 31, 2015.

Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on modifications considered troubled debt restructurings, including certain qualitative and quantitative data about troubled debt restructurings performed in the past twelve months.

157


Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses

Non-Covered Loan Portfolio

The allowance for loan losses, which represents management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, is maintained at a sufficient level to provide for estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. In this evaluation, management considers current economic conditions and the resulting impact on Popular Inc.’s loan portfolio, the composition of the portfolio by loan type and risk characteristics, historical loss experience, results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans, regulatory requirements and loan impairment measurement, among other factors.

The Corporation must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown, such as economic developments affecting specific customers, industries or markets. Other factors that can affect management’s estimates are the years of historical data when estimating losses, changes in underwriting standards, financial accounting standards and loan impairment measurements, among others. Changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers, in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the various markets in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for loan losses. Consequently, the business financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations could also be affected. Refer to Note 2 of the 2015 Form 10-K for a description of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology.

The following tables set forth information concerning the composition of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 by loan category and by whether the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant to the requirements for specific impairment or through a general valuation allowance.

158


Table of Contents

Table 34—Composition of ALLL

March 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial Construction Legacy [3] Leasing Mortgage Consumer Total [2]

Specific ALLL

$ 55,098 $ 172 $ $ 608 $ 43,252 $ 24,907 $ 124,037

Impaired loans [1]

$ 338,980 $ 2,020 $ $ 2,391 $ 479,092 $ 112,167 $ 934,650

Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1]

16.25 % 8.51 % % 25.43 % 9.03 % 22.21 % 13.27 %

General ALLL

$ 152,079 $ 8,804 $ 2,484 $ 10,427 $ 86,347 $ 124,249 $ 384,390

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

$ 9,889,409 $ 732,838 $ 61,044 $ 640,751 $ 6,500,109 $ 3,748,936 $ 21,573,087

General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

1.54 % 1.20 % 4.07 % 1.63 % 1.33 % 3.31 % 1.78 %

Total ALLL

$ 207,177 $ 8,976 $ 2,484 $ 11,035 $ 129,599 $ 149,156 $ 508,427

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio [1]

$ 10,228,389 $ 734,858 $ 61,044 $ 643,142 $ 6,979,201 $ 3,861,103 $ 22,507,737

ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1]

2.03 % 1.22 % 4.07 % 1.72 % 1.86 % 3.86 % 2.26 %

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.
[2] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. At March 31, 2016, the general allowance on the covered loans amounted to $30 million.
[3] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

Table 35—Composition of ALLL

December 31, 2015

(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial Construction Legacy [3] Leasing Mortgage Consumer Total [2]

Specific ALLL

$ 49,243 $ 264 $ $ 573 $ 44,029 $ 23,963 $ 118,072

Impaired loans [1]

$ 337,133 $ 2,481 $ $ 2,404 $ 471,932 $ 111,836 $ 925,786

Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1]

14.61 % 10.64 % % 23.84 % 9.33 % 21.43 % 12.75 %

General ALLL

$ 147,590 $ 8,605 $ 2,687 $ 10,420 $ 89,283 $ 126,278 $ 384,863

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

$ 9,762,030 $ 678,625 $ 64,436 $ 625,246 $ 6,564,149 $ 3,725,843 $ 21,420,329

General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

1.51 % 1.27 % 4.17 % 1.67 % 1.36 % 3.39 % 1.80 %

Total ALLL

$ 196,833 $ 8,869 $ 2,687 $ 10,993 $ 133,312 $ 150,241 $ 502,935

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio [1]

$ 10,099,163 $ 681,106 $ 64,436 $ 627,650 $ 7,036,081 $ 3,837,679 $ 22,346,115

ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1]

1.95 % 1.30 % 4.17 % 1.75 % 1.89 % 3.91 % 2.25 %

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.
[2] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. At December 31, 2015, the general allowance on the covered loans amounted to $34.2 million.
[3] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

At March 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses, excluding covered loans, increased by $6 million when compared with December 31, 2015, mostly driven by higher specific reserve. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio increased to 2.26% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2016, compared with 2.25% at December 31, 2015. The ratio of the allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was stable at 84.80% at March 31, 2016, compared with 83.57% at December 31, 2015.

159


Table of Contents

At March 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans at the BPPR segment remained stable at $473 million, or 2.70% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio, compared with $470 million, or 2.67% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2015. The ratio of the allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was 84.25% at March 31, 2016, compared with 81.75% at December 31, 2015.

The allowance for loan losses at the BPNA segment increased slightly to $35 million, or 0.71% of loans held-in-portfolio, compared with $33 million, or 0.69% of loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2015, mostly driven by organic commercial and construction loan growth. The ratio of the allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was 93.05% at March 31, 2016, compared with 122.43% at December 31, 2015.

The allowance for loan losses for commercial loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, increased by $10 million from December 31, 2015. The allowance for loan losses for the commercial loan portfolio in the BPPR segment, excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $198 million, or 2.68% of non-covered commercial loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2016, compared with $187 million, or 2.54%, at December 31, 2015. Increase of $11 million includes $6 million related to higher specific reserves. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the commercial loan portfolio amounted to $10 million at March 31, 2016, flat when compared to December 31, 2015. The allowance for loan losses for commercial loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment was 0.34% of commercial loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2016, compared with 0.36%, at December 31, 2015. The Corporation’s ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio in the commercial loan category was 104.83% at March 31, 2016, compared with 108.26% at December 31, 2015.

The allowance for loan losses for construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $9 million, or 1.22% of that portfolio, at March 31, 2016, compared with $9 million, or 1.30%, at December 31, 2015. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPPR segment, excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $4 million, or 4.03% of non-covered construction loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2016, compared with $5 million, or 4.91%, at December 31, 2015. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the construction loan portfolio totaled $5 million, or 0.75% of construction loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2016, compared with $4 million, or 0.67%, at December 31, 2015. The Corporation’s ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in portfolio in the construction loan category was 227.76% at March 31, 2016, compared with 249.83% at December 31, 2015. Stable allowance levels in the construction portfolio result from the de-risking strategies executed by the Corporation over the past several years.

The allowance for loan losses for mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, decreased by $4 million from December 31, 2015. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio at the BPPR segment totaled $125 million, or 2.04% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, at March 31, 2016, compared with $128 million, or 2.09%, respectively, at December 31, 2015. This decrease was prompted by a decline in the allowance for purchased credit impaired loans (ASC 310-30) and lower specific reserves. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio remained unchanged at $5 million, or 0.58% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2016, compared 0.55% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2015.

The allowance for loan losses for the consumer portfolio, excluding covered loans, decreased slightly to $149 million, or 3.86% of that portfolio, at March 31, 2016, compared to $150 million, or 3.91%, at December 31, 2015. The allowance for loan losses of the non-covered consumer loan portfolio in the BPPR segment totaled $136 million, or 4.10% of that portfolio, at March 31, 2016, compared with $139 million, or 4.15%, at December 31, 2015. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the consumer loan portfolio totaled $13 million, or 2.42% of consumer loans, at March 31, 2016, compared with $12 million, or 2.34%, at December 31, 2015.

Table 36—Impaired Loans (Non-Covered Loans) and the Related Valuation Allowance

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

(In millions)

Recorded
Investment
Valuation
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Valuation
Allowance

Impaired loans:

Valuation allowance

$ 806.1 $ 124.0 $ 807.4 $ 118.1

No valuation allowance required

128.6 118.4

Total impaired loans

$ 934.7 $ 124.0 $ 925.8 $ 118.1

160


Table of Contents

The following tables set forth the activity in the specific reserves for non-covered impaired loans for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Table 37—Activity in Specific ALLL for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2016

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Leasing Total

Beginning balance

$ 49,243 $ 264 $ 44,029 $ $ 23,963 $ 573 $ 118,072

Provision for impaired loans

7,137 18 2,610 4,429 36 14,230

Less: Net charge-offs

(1,282 ) (110 ) (3,387 ) (3,485 ) (1 ) (8,265 )

Specific allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2016

$ 55,098 $ 172 $ 43,252 $ $ 24,907 $ 608 $ 124,037

Table 38—Activity in Specific ALLL for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Commercial Construction Mortgage Legacy Consumer Leasing Total

Beginning balance

$ 64,736 $ 363 $ 46,111 $ $ 28,161 $ 770 $ 140,141

Provision for impaired loans

9,483 (205 ) (1,221 ) 1,238 (62 ) 9,233

Less: Net charge-offs

(4,273 ) (2,320 ) (3,795 ) (21 ) (10,409 )

Specific allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2015

$ 69,946 $ 158 $ 42,570 $ $ 25,604 $ 687 $ 138,965

For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, total net charge-offs for individually evaluated impaired loans amounted to approximately $8.3 million related to the BPPR segment.

The table that follows presents the approximate amount and percentage of non-covered commercial impaired loans for which the Corporation relied on appraisals dated more than one year old for purposes of impairment requirements at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Table 39—Non-Covered Impaired Loans with Appraisals Dated 1 year or Older

March 31, 2016

Total Impaired Loans – Held-in-
portfolio (HIP)

(In thousands)

Loan Count Outstanding Principal
Balance
Impaired Loans with
Appraisals Over
One-Year Old [1]

Commercial

120 $ 283,501 23 %

[1] Based on outstanding balance of total impaired loans.

December 31, 2015

Total Impaired Loans – Held-in-
portfolio (HIP)

(In thousands)

Loan Count Outstanding Principal
Balance
Impaired Loans with
Appraisals Over
One-Year Old [1]

Commercial

118 $ 281,478 29 %

[1] Based on outstanding balance of total impaired loans.

161


Table of Contents

Allowance for loan losses – Covered loan portfolio

The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses for the covered loan portfolio acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction amounted to $30 million at March 31, 2016, compared to $34 million at December 31, 2015. This allowance covers the estimated credit loss exposure related to acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, which required an allowance for loan losses of $30 million at March 31, 2016, compared with $34 million at December 31, 2015.

Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date for loans (pools) accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses in the current period. For purposes of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and new loans originated as a result of loan commitments assumed, the Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the accounting guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment. Concurrently, the Corporation records an increase in the FDIC loss share asset for the expected reimbursement from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements.

Geographic and government risk

The Corporation is exposed to geographic and government risk. The Corporation’s assets and revenue composition by geographical area and by business segment reporting are presented in Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements. A significant portion of our financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in Puerto Rico, which entered into recession in the second quarter of 2006. Puerto Rico’s gross national product contracted in real terms in every year between fiscal year 2007 and fiscal year 2011 (inclusive), grew by 0.5% in fiscal year 2012 and decreased by 0.2% and 0.9% in fiscal years 2013 and 2014, respectively. The changes in the gross national product in fiscal years 2012, 2013 and 2014 also have to be analyzed in light of the large amount of governmental stimulus and deficit spending in those fiscal years. According to the Puerto Rico Planning Board’s baseline scenario projections, for fiscal years 2015 and 2016, gross national product is projected to further contract by 0.9% and 1.2%, respectively. The latest Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (“GDB”) Economic Activity Index, which is an indicator of general economic activity and not a direct measurement of gross national product, reflected a 1.8% reduction in the average for fiscal year 2015 (July 2014 to June 2015), compared to the prior fiscal year. For the first nine months of fiscal year 2016, the Economic Activity Index decreased approximately 1.3%, compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”) is experiencing a severe fiscal crisis resulting from persistent and significant budget deficits, a high debt burden, the continuing economic contraction and lack of access to the capital markets, among other factors. Budget deficits were historically covered with bond financings, loans from GDB and extraordinary one-time revenue measures. GDB has traditionally served as the principal depositary of public funds and lender to the Commonwealth, its public corporations and municipalities. As a result of multiple downgrades of the Commonwealth and its instrumentalities’ obligations to below investment grade ratings since February 2014 and ongoing liquidity constraints at the Commonwealth central government and GDB, the Commonwealth’s ability to finance future budget deficits is expected to be very limited, if any.

The Government’s most recent estimate of the budget deficit for fiscal year 2015 is approximately $703 million. For fiscal year 2016, the Government approved a $9.8 billion budget, which is $235 million higher than the approved budget for fiscal year 2015 due primarily to a significant increase in debt service payments and special pension contributions. In December 2015, however, the Government revised its revenue estimate for fiscal year 2016 downward by $508 million, to approximately $9.3 billion.

In order to confront its liquidity constraints and this decrease in revenues, while continuing to provide essential services, the Government has been forced to implement certain extraordinary measures. These measures include, among others: (i) requiring advance payment to the Treasury Department from the two largest government retirement systems of funds required for the payment of retirement benefits to participants (instead of the usual reimbursements made by the retirement systems to the Treasury Department for pension benefit payments made by the Treasury Department on behalf of the retirement systems); (ii) placing $400 million of tax and revenue anticipation notes with certain Commonwealth instrumentalities to fund fiscal year 2016 working capital needs; (iii) suspending during fiscal year 2016 Commonwealth set-asides required by Act No. 39 of May 13, 1976, as amended, for the payment of its general obligation debt; (iv) retaining certain tax revenues that were assigned to particular public corporations and redirecting those revenues to pay general obligation debt of the Commonwealth (commonly referred to as the exercise of the clawback of revenues); (v) delaying the payment of third-party payables or amounts due to public corporations; (vi) deferring the disbursement of certain budgetary appropriations; and (vii) delaying the payment of income tax refunds. Some of these measures are unsustainable and have significant negative economic effects.

162


Table of Contents

The Commonwealth also did not appropriate in the approved budget for fiscal year 2016 the funds necessary to pay principal of and interest on bonds issued by the Puerto Rico Public Finance Corporation (“PFC”), a subsidiary of GDB, which further reflects the Commonwealth’s serious liquidity constraints. As a result, in fiscal year 2016, PFC has not paid debt service on approximately $1.1 billion of bonds payable solely from Commonwealth legislative appropriations. As of May 1, 2016, missed payments amounted to approximately $90 million. In addition, as a result of the clawback of revenues mentioned above, other public corporations (including the Infrastructure Financing Authority, the Highways and Transportation Authority and the Convention Center District Authority) were not able to meet their debt obligations due on January 1, 2016 or did so using moneys previously held by the bond indenture trustees in reserves or other accounts. Pursuant to Act 21-2016, further discussed below, on April 30, 2016, the Governor signed an executive order whereby he declared a moratorium on certain obligations of GDB and, pursuant to such executive order, on May 1, 2016, GDB failed to make a principal payment of approximately $367 million in respect of its notes.

Further in response to the fiscal crisis, the Commonwealth has also enacted various revenue raising and expense reduction measures, the principal one on the revenue side being an increase in the sales and use tax (“SUT”) rate pursuant to Act 72-2015, enacted on May 29, 2015. Effective July 1, 2015, transactions that were subject to the 7% SUT have been subject to an 11.5% SUT (10.5% collected on behalf of the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation and the Commonwealth, of which 0.5% goes to a special fund for the benefit of the municipalities, and 1% collected by the municipalities). Act 72-2015 also provides for a transition to a value added tax (“VAT”), scheduled for May 31, 2016, to substitute the central government’s portion of the SUT. In addition, from October 1, 2015 and until May 31, 2016: (i) business-to-business transactions that were taxable prior to July 1, 2015 are subject to an 11.5% SUT, (ii) certain business-to-business services and designated professional services that were previously exempt from SUT are subject to a Commonwealth SUT of 4% (but no municipal SUT will apply to these services), and (iii) specific services are exempt from SUT. After May 31, 2016, all transactions subject to the SUT will be subject to a new VAT of 10.5% plus a 1% municipal SUT (except certain business-to-business and designated professional services that were exempt prior to July 1, 2015, to which no municipal SUT will apply). On May 5, 2016, the Commonwealth’s Legislative Assembly approved a bill that would eliminate the VAT system, including the business-to-business tax increase from 4% to 10.5%. The Governor has expressed his intent to veto such bill. At this time, however, it is uncertain whether the Governor will veto the bill and, if so, whether the Legislative Assembly will override such veto.

On the expense side, the measures have included a comprehensive reform of the principal pension system of the Commonwealth, which is severely underfunded and faces asset depletion in the near future, and the enactment of a fiscal emergency law that freezes benefits under collective bargaining agreements and formula appropriations to various governmental entities and other branches of the central government, among various expense control measures.

All of these measures, however, have been insufficient to address the current fiscal crisis and the Commonwealth has indicated that it will not have sufficient liquidity before the end of this fiscal year (ending on June 30, 2016) to meet all of its debt service obligations while continuing to provide essential services to the residents of Puerto Rico.

In response to the continued fiscal and economic challenges, the Government of Puerto Rico engaged a group of former IMF economists to analyze the Commonwealth’s economic and financial stability and growth prospects. The group’s final report, commonly known as the “Krueger Report,” was delivered to the Governor of Puerto Rico on June 28, 2015 and states that Puerto Rico faces an acute crisis in the face of faltering economic activity, faltering fiscal solvency and debt sustainability, and faltering institutional credibility. Some of the report’s principal conclusions are as follows: (i) the economic problems of Puerto Rico are structural, not cyclical, and are not going away without structural reforms, (ii) fiscal deficits are much larger than assumed and are set to deteriorate, (iii) the central government deficits (as measured in the report) over the coming years imply an unsustainable trajectory of large financing gaps, and (iv) Puerto Rico’s public debt cannot be made sustainable without growth, nor can growth occur in the face of structural obstacles and doubts about debt sustainability.

The report concludes that, even after factoring in a substantial fiscal effort, a large residual financing gap persists into the next decade, implying a need for debt relief. To close the financing gap, the government would need to seek relief from a significant but progressively declining proportion of principal and interest due during fiscal years 2016 to 2024. The report acknowledges that any debt restructuring would be challenging as there is no precedent of this scale and scope, but concludes that, from an economic perspective, the fact remains that the central government faces large financing gaps even with substantial adjustment efforts (as there are limits to how much expenditures can be cut or taxes raised).

On June 29, 2015, the Governor of Puerto Rico issued an Executive Order to create the Puerto Rico Fiscal and Economic Recovery Working Group (the “Working Group”). The Working Group was created to consider the measures necessary, including the measures recommended in the Krueger Report, to address the fiscal crisis of the Commonwealth and to develop and recommend to the Governor of Puerto Rico a fiscal and economic adjustment plan.

163


Table of Contents

On September 9, 2015, the Working Group presented a draft of the Fiscal and Economic Growth Plan (the “FEGP”), which was subsequently updated on January 18, 2016. The FEGP projects that, absent further corrective action, the Commonwealth’s cumulative five-year financing gap for fiscal years 2016 to 2020 will be approximately $27.9 billion ($63.4 billion for the ten-year projection period), and that this financing gap could be reduced to approximately $16.1 billion ($23.9 billion for the ten-year projection period) through a combination of identified revenue increases and expense reduction measures and assuming a level of economic growth. With approximately $33 billion of debt service over the next ten years, the FEGP concludes that the Commonwealth will not have sufficient projected surplus to pay its scheduled debt service and that a debt restructuring is necessary to avoid a disorderly default and allow the Commonwealth to implement the structural reforms and growth initiatives identified in the FEGP. The FEGP also concludes that, unless economic growth can be achieved, the Commonwealth’s debt is not sustainable. The FEGP also states that without the emergency measures taken in fiscal year 2016, which have significantly increased the economic burden on taxpayers and third party suppliers, the Commonwealth would have already exhausted its liquidity and that, in any case, it will not have sufficient resources at the end of the fiscal year to meet its debt obligations. The FEGP does not include the debt of Puerto Rico’s municipalities. The FEGP contemplates, however, as part of the expense reduction measures, that the government will gradually reduce subsidies provided to the municipalities by the central government. The FEGP is publicly available in GDB’s website.

In January 2016, Government officials and advisors met with the advisors to the Commonwealth’s creditors to present the Commonwealth’s initial restructuring proposal, which was subsequently made public. A revised proposal was presented in March 2016 and was also subsequently made public. Such proposal seeks an orderly restructuring of the Commonwealth’s direct debt and other tax-supported debt issued by certain public corporations, amounting to approximately $49.2 billion, in order to provide the Commonwealth the necessary debt relief to enable it to confront the significant projected shortfalls contemplated in the FEGP. The revised proposal contemplates an exchange of existing securities for two new classes of securities, a “base bond” with a fixed interest rate and amortization schedule and a capital appreciation bond with a 49-year maturity. The proposal also contemplates no principal payments until fiscal year 2021. The proposal would have the following benefits for the Commonwealth, among others: (1) preservation of the ability to provide essential goods and services to the residents of Puerto Rico, (2) time and capital necessary to implement the FEGP’s structural reforms and “growth” initiatives, (3) financial flexibility to rebuild depleted cash resources and pay down suppliers whose payables are past due and taxpayers to whom refunds are owed, as well as making adequate pension contributions, and (4) achievement of a sustainable debt structure for the long term. The Commonwealth believes the proposal also offers creditor significant benefits, including improved liquidity and better collateral security for the restructured debt, as well as a structure to resolve potential inter-creditor disputes. There can be no assurance, however, that the Commonwealth will be able to successfully consummate its proposal or any other debt restructuring without some Federal restructuring authority, in particular given the large amount of targeted debt and extremely complex nature of these credits.

On October 21, 2015, the Obama Administration released a proposal to address Puerto Rico’s urgent fiscal crisis. The proposal states that Puerto Rico is in the midst of an economic and fiscal crisis that requires Congressional action and makes the following recommendations: (i) Congress should extend Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to Puerto Rico, and also provide a broader legal framework to allow for a comprehensive restructuring of Puerto Rico’s liabilities, (ii) Congress should provide independent fiscal oversight to ensure Puerto Rico adheres to its recovery plan and fully implements proposed reforms, (iii) Congress should provide a long-term solution to Puerto Rico’s historically inadequate Medicaid treatment, and (iv) Congress should extend to Puerto Rico certain proven measures to reward work and stimulate growth, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit. Since October 2015, the two houses of the United States Congress have held various hearings on Puerto Rico’s economy and debt, and various options to address Puerto Rico’s fiscal crisis are under consideration, including the establishment of a Federal fiscal control board and providing broad based restructuring authority. The Committee of Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives is currently considering House Bill 4900, which, among other things, seeks to create a federal control board with legal authority over certain matters of the Commonwealth and which would provide a process for the restructuring of certain obligations of the Commonwealth and its public corporations and municipalities. Such bill is expected to suffer additional changes and, at this time, it is unclear whether or when it will be approved.

The Commonwealth’s public corporations and instrumentalities are also facing financial challenges. On June 28, 2014, Governor Alejandro García Padilla signed into law the Puerto Rico Public Corporation Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (the “Recovery Act”) which provides a framework for certain public corporations, including the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”), the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority, to restructure their debt obligations in order to ensure that the services they provide to the public are not interrupted. Puerto Rico’s municipalities were not made eligible for the Recovery Act.

In July 2014, certain holders of PREPA bonds and an investment manager, on behalf of funds which hold PREPA bonds, filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (the “District Court”) seeking a declaratory judgment that the Recovery Act violates several provisions of the United States Constitution. The District Court consolidated the actions. On February 6, 2015, the District Court issued an opinion and order declaring the Recovery Act unconstitutional and stating that it was preempted by the federal Bankruptcy Code. The District Court permanently enjoined the Commonwealth officers from enforcing the Recovery Act. The Commonwealth filed an expedited appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and, on July 6, 2015, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision. The Commonwealth filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, which was granted on December 4, 2015. The United States Supreme Court held oral arguments in this case on March 22, 2016 and is expected to issue its decision this summer.

164


Table of Contents

In August 2014, as a result of PREPA’s inability to comply with certain scheduled debt payments, PREPA entered into forbearance agreements with certain bondholders, municipal bond insurers, and lenders (including BPPR) pursuant to which the forbearing creditors agreed to forbear from exercising certain rights and remedies under their applicable debt instruments. On November 5, 2015, PREPA announced that it had entered into a restructuring support agreement with certain creditors setting forth the economic terms of a recovery plan. Execution of the transactions set forth in the restructuring support agreement was subject to a number of material conditions, including the enactment of legislation by January 22, 2016. When such condition was not met, the restructuring support agreement automatically terminated. On January 27, 2016, PREPA and certain creditors, including monoline bond insurers that were not party to the original restructuring support agreement, entered into a new restructuring support agreement, also subject to various material conditions, including the approval of legislation by February 16, 2016. With respect to PREPA’s credit facilities, the restructuring support agreement contemplates that the lenders, which hold approximately $700 million of matured debt, would convert their existing credit facilities into term loans to be repaid over six years in accordance with an amortization schedule. Although legislation was approved by the February 16, 2016 deadline, there can be no assurance, however, that the conditions to the restructuring support agreement will be met. At March 31, 2016, BPPR is a lender in PREPA’s syndicated credit facility and BPPR’s exposure was $40.9 million, as shown in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements.

On April 6, 2016, the Commonwealth enacted Act 21-2016, entitled the “Puerto Rico Emergency Moratorium and Financial Rehabilitation Act” (“Act 21”). Act 21 authorizes the Governor to, among other things, declare a stay on certain litigation, suspend certain creditor remedies, and impose a moratorium on debt service payments of the Commonwealth and certain public corporations through January 31, 2017, with a possible two month extension, in the Governor’s discretion. Act 21 also permits the Governor to take other actions to allow GDB to continue carrying out its operations. On April 8, 2016, the Governor signed an executive order declaring GDB to be in a state of emergency pursuant to Act 21 and implementing a framework governing GDB’s operations, including imposing restrictions on the withdrawal of funds held on deposit at GDB and suspending loan disbursements by GDB. Further, on April 30, 2016, the Governor signed a second executive order under Act 21 declaring an emergency period with respect to certain obligations of the Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority and declaring a moratorium on the payment of certain obligations of GDB. Act 21 also included amendments to the receivership provision in GDB’s organic act and authorized the creation of a temporary “bridge bank” to carry out GDB’s functions.

The lingering effects of the prolonged recession are still reflected in limited loan demand, an increase in the rate of foreclosures and delinquencies on mortgage loans granted in Puerto Rico. If global or local economic conditions worsen or the Government of Puerto Rico is unable to manage its fiscal crisis in an orderly manner, including consummating an orderly restructuring of its debt obligations while continuing to provide essential services, those adverse effects could continue or worsen in ways that we are not able to predict. Any reduction in consumer spending as a result of these issues may also adversely impact our non-interest income.

At March 31, 2016, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $656 million, of which approximately $565 million is outstanding ($669 million and $578 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015). Of the amount outstanding, $490 million consists of loans and $75 million are securities ($502 million and $76 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015). Of the amount outstanding, $61 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment ($76 million at December 31, 2015). Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $504 million represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment ($502 million at December 31, 2015). These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating costs and expenses of the municipality. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. Further deterioration of the fiscal crisis of the Government of Puerto Rico could further affect the value of these loans and securities, resulting in losses to us.

Although the obligations of Puerto Rico’s municipalities are not included in the debt restructuring proposed by the Government, the municipalities could nonetheless be affected by general economic conditions and the Government of Puerto Rico’s fiscal crisis.

165


Table of Contents

Furthermore, as part of various measures to address its limited liquidity and fiscal crisis, the Government may take measures that have a direct or indirect adverse impact on the municipalities. The first executive order issued by the Governor pursuant to Act 21 could adversely affect various municipalities by limiting their ability to withdraw funds on deposit at GDB and to obtain new loans or continue receiving undisbursed loans from GDB. In addition, pending federal legislation described above would provide a process for restructuring obligations of such municipalities.

In addition, at March 31, 2016, the Corporation had $417 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default ($394 million at December 31, 2015). These included $339 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (December 31, 2015—$316 million). These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Under recently enacted Act 21, the Governor is authorized to impose a temporary moratorium on the financial obligations of Puerto Housing Finance Authority. Also, the Corporation had $51 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $27 million of industrial development notes ($50 million and $28 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015).

As further detailed in Notes 7 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial portion of the Corporation’s investment securities represented exposure to the U.S. Government in the form of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well as agency mortgage-backed and U.S. Treasury securities. In addition, $873 million of residential mortgages and $102 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies at March 31, 2016. The Corporation does not have any exposure to European sovereign debt.

166


Table of Contents

ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Refer to Note 3, “New Accounting Pronouncements” to the consolidated financial statements.

167


Table of Contents

Adjusted results of operations – Non-GAAP Financial Measure

The Corporation prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements using accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP” or the “reported basis”). In addition to analyzing the Corporation’s results on a reported basis, management monitors the performance of the Corporation on an “adjusted basis” and excludes the impact of certain transactions on the results of its operations. Through this MD&A, the Corporation presents a discussion of its financial results excluding the impact of these events to arrive at the “adjusted results”. Management believes that the “adjusted basis” provides meaningful information about the underlying performance of the Corporation’s ongoing operations. The “adjusted results” are a Non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to the following tables for a reconciliation of the reported results to the “adjusted results” for the quarters ended March 31, 2016, and 2015. No adjustments are reflected for the first quarter of 2016 results.

168


Table of Contents

Table 40—Adjusted Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2015 (Non-GAAP)

(Unaudited)

Quarter ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)

Actual Results
(U.S. GAAP)
BPNA Reorganization
[2]
Doral
Acquisition [3]
Adjusted
Results
(Non-GAAP)

Net interest income

$ 343,195 $ $ $ 343,195

Provision for loan losses – non-covered loans

29,711 29,711

Provision for loan losses – covered loans [1]

10,324 10,324

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

303,160 303,160

Mortgage banking activities

12,852 12,852

FDIC loss-share income

4,139 4,139

Other non-interest income

98,244 1,121 97,123

Total non-interest income

115,235 1,121 114,114

Personnel costs

116,458 2,432 114,026

Net occupancy expenses

21,709 643 21,066

Equipment expenses

13,411 13,411

Professional fees

75,528 6,997 68,531

Communications

6,176 6,176

Business promotion

10,813 10,813

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

23,069 23,069

Restructuring costs

10,753 10,753

Other operating expenses

34,425 34,425

Total operating expenses

312,342 10,753 10,072 291,517

Income from continuing operations before income tax

106,053 (10,753 ) (8,951 ) 125,757

Income tax expense

32,568 (2,896 ) 35,464

Income from continuing operations

$ 73,485 $ (10,753 ) $ (6,055 ) $ 90,293

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

$ 1,341 $ 1,341 $ $

Net income

$ 74,826 $ (9,412 ) $ (6,055 ) $ 90,293

[1] Covered loans represent loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are covered under an FDIC loss-sharing agreement.
[2] Represents restructuring charges associated with the reorganization of BPNA.
[3] Includes $1.1 million on fees charged for serviced provided to the alliance co-bidders, including loan servicing and other interim services, personnel cost related to Doral employees retained on a temporary basis and non-recurring incentive compensation for an aggregate of $2.4 million, building rent expense of Doral’s administrative offices for $0.6 million and professional and legal fees directly associated with the Doral acquisition for $7.0 million.

169


Table of Contents

Table 41—Adjusted Consolidated Statement of Operations (Non-GAAP)—Comparative Quarters

(Unaudited)

As Reported
(U.S. GAAP)
Adjusted Results
(Non-GAAP)
For the quarters ended

(In thousands)

March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015 Variance

Net interest income

$ 352,412 $ 343,195 $ 9,217

Provision for loan losses – non-covered loans

47,940 29,711 18,229

Provision (reversal) for loan losses – covered loans [1]

(3,105 ) 10,324 (13,429 )

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

307,577 303,160 4,417

Mortgage banking activities

10,551 12,852 (2,301 )

FDIC loss-share (expense) income

(3,146 ) 4,139 (7,285 )

Other non-interest income

104,225 97,123 7,102

Total non-interest income

111,630 114,114 (2,484 )

Personnel costs

127,091 114,026 13,065

Net occupancy expenses

20,430 21,066 (636 )

Equipment expenses

14,548 13,411 1,137

Professional fees

75,459 68,531 6,928

Communications

6,320 6,176 144

Business promotion

11,110 10,813 297

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

9,141 23,069 (13,928 )

Other operating expenses

37,844 34,425 3,419

Total operating expenses

301,943 291,517 10,426

Income from continuing operations before income tax

117,264 125,757 (8,493 )

Income tax expense

32,265 35,464 (3,199 )

Income from continuing operations

$ 84,999 $ 90,293 $ (5,294 )

Net income

$ 84,999 $ 90,293 $ (5,294 )

[1] Covered loans represent loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are covered under an FDIC loss-sharing agreement.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures for the current period can be found in the Market Risk section of this report, which includes changes in market risk exposures from disclosures presented in the Corporation’s 2015 Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Corporation’s management, with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

170


Table of Contents

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II—O ther Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a discussion of Legal Proceedings, see Note 23, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under “Part I—Item 1A—Risk Factors” in our 2015 Form 10-K. These factors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also refer to the discussion in “Part I—Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this report for additional information that may supplement or update the discussion of risk factors in our 2015 Form 10-K.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A of the Corporation’s 2015 Form 10-K.

The risks described in our 2015 Form 10-K and in this report are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

171


Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In April 2004, the Corporation’s shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Corporation has to date used shares purchased in the market to make grants under the Plan. As of March 31, 2016 the maximum number of shares of common stock that may have been granted under this plan was 3,500,000.

In connection with the Corporation’s participation in the Capital Purchase Program under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the consent of the U.S. Department of the Treasury will be required for the Corporation to repurchase its common stock other than in connection with benefit plans consistent with past practice and certain other specified circumstances. The Corporation terminated its participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, after the repurchase on July 23, 2014, of the outstanding warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury.

The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Not in thousands

Period

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
Average Price
Paid per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or Programs
Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs

January 1- January 31

163,838 $ 24.81

February 1- February 29

March 1- March 31

Total March 31, 2016

163,838 $ 24.81

172


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Exhibit Description

10.1 Form of Director Compensation Letter, Election Form and Restricted Stock Agreement, effective April 26, 2016 (1)
12.1 Computation of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (1)
31.1 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
31.2 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
101.INS XBRL Instance Document (1)
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1)
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document (1)
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1)
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1)

(1) Included herewith

173


Table of Contents

SIGN ATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

POPULAR, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: May 10, 2016 By:

/s/ Carlos J. Vázquez

Carlos J. Vázquez
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 10, 2016 By:

/s/ Jorge J. García

Jorge J. García
Senior Vice President & Corporate Comptroller

174

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Note 1 Nature Of OperationsprintNote 2 Basis Of Presentation and Summary Of Significant Accounting PoliciesprintNote 3 New Accounting PronouncementsprintNote 4 Discontinued Operations and Restructuring PlanprintNote 5 Business CombinationprintNote 6 Restrictions on Cash and Due From Banks and Certain SecuritiesprintNote 7 Investment Securities Available-for-saleprintNote 8 Investment Securities Held-to-maturityprintNote 9 LoansprintNote 10 Allowance For Loan LossesprintNote 11 Fdic Loss-share Asset and True-up Payment ObligationprintNote 12 Mortgage Banking ActivitiesprintNote 13 Transfers Of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing AssetsprintNote 14 Other Real Estate OwnedprintNote 15 Other AssetsprintNote 16 Goodwill and Other Intangible AssetsprintNote 17 DepositsprintNote 18 BorrowingsprintNote 19 Offsetting Of Financial Assets and LiabilitiesprintNote 20 Stockholders EquityprintNote 21 Other Comprehensive LossprintNote 22 GuaranteesprintNote 23 Commitments and ContingenciesprintNote 24 Non-consolidated Variable Interest EntitiesprintNote 25 Related Party TransactionsprintNote 26 Fair Value MeasurementprintNote 27 Fair Value Of Financial InstrumentsprintNote 28 Net Income Per Common ShareprintNote 29 Other Service FeesprintNote 30 Fdic Loss Share (expense) IncomeprintNote 31 Pension and Postretirement BenefitsprintNote 32 Stock-based CompensationprintNote 33 Income TaxesprintNote 34 Supplemental Disclosure on The Consolidated Statements Of Cash FlowsprintNote 35 Segment ReportingprintNote 36 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information Of Guarantor and Issuers Of Registered Guaranteed SecuritiesprintItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsprintItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskprintItem 4. Controls and ProceduresprintPart II O Ther InformationprintItem 1. Legal ProceedingsprintItem 1A. Risk FactorsprintItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsprintItem 6. Exhibitsprint