CALERES INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016
|
|
|
OR
|
|
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from ____________ to ______________
|
|
Commission file number 1-2191
CALERES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
New York
|
43-0197190
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number)
|
|
8300 Maryland Avenue
|
63105
|
|
St. Louis, Missouri
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(314) 854-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common Stock — par value $0.01 per share
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
¨
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
Accelerated filer
¨
|
Non-accelerated filer
¨
|
Smaller reporting company
¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
¨
No
þ
The aggregate market value of the stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of July 31, 2015, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $1,421.3 million.
As of
February 26, 2016
,
43,659,252
common shares were outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
INTRODUCTION
This Annual Report on Form 10-K is a document that U.S. public companies file with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on an annual basis. Part II of the Form 10-K contains the business information and financial statements that many companies include in the financial sections of their annual reports. The other sections of this Form 10-K include further information about our business that we believe will be of interest to investors. We hope investors will find it useful to have all of this information in a single document.
The SEC allows us to report information in the Form 10-K by “incorporating by reference” from another part of the Form 10-K or from the proxy statement. You will see that information is “incorporated by reference” in various parts of our Form 10-K. The proxy statement will be available on our website after it is filed with the SEC in April
2016
.
Unless the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” or “Caleres” refers to Caleres, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Information in this Form 10-K is current as of March 29,
2016
, unless otherwise specified.
CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In this report, and from time to time throughout the year, we share our expectations for the Company’s future performance. These forward-looking statements include statements about our business plans; the potential development, regulatory approval and public acceptance of our products; our expected financial performance, including sales performance, and the anticipated effect of our strategic actions; the anticipated benefits of acquisitions; the outcome of contingencies, such as litigation; domestic or international economic, political and market conditions; and other factors that could affect our future results of operations or financial position, including, without limitation, statements under the captions “Business,” “Legal Proceedings” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Any statements we make that are not matters of current disclosures or historical fact should be considered forward-looking. Such statements often include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “will” and similar expressions. By their nature, these types of statements are uncertain and are not guarantees of our future performance.
Our forward-looking statements represent our estimates and expectations at the time that we make them. However, circumstances change constantly, often unpredictably, and investors should not place undue reliance on these statements. Many events beyond our control will determine whether our expectations will be realized. We disclaim any current intention or obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, or the factors that may affect their realization, whether in light of new information, future events or otherwise, and investors should not rely on us to do so. In the interests of our investors, and in accordance with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Part I. Item 1A.
Risk Factors
explains some of the important reasons that actual results may be materially different from those that we anticipate.
y
2
|
INDEX
|
|
|
PART I
|
Page
|
|
|
Item 1
|
||
|
Item 1A
|
||
|
Item 1B
|
||
|
Item 2
|
||
|
Item 3
|
||
|
Item 4
|
||
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
Item 5
|
||
|
Item 6
|
||
|
Item 7
|
||
|
Item 7A
|
||
|
Item 8
|
||
|
Item 9
|
||
|
Item 9A
|
||
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
||
|
Item 9B
|
||
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
Item 10
|
||
|
Item 11
|
||
|
Item 12
|
||
|
Item 13
|
||
|
Item 14
|
||
|
PART IV
|
|
|
|
Item 15
|
||
3
|
|
|
ITEM 1
|
BUSINESS
|
Caleres, Inc., originally founded as Brown Shoe Company, Inc. in 1878 and incorporated in 1913, is a global footwear retailer and wholesaler with annual net sales of
$2.6 billion
. In May 2015, the shareholders of Brown Shoe Company, Inc. approved a rebranding initiative that changed the name of the company to Caleres, Inc. (the "Company"). Current activities include the operation of retail shoe stores and e-commerce websites as well as the design, sourcing and marketing of footwear for women and men. Our business is seasonal in nature due to consumer spending patterns, with higher back-to-school and Christmas season sales. Traditionally, the third fiscal quarter accounts for a substantial portion of our earnings for the year.
During
2015
, categories of our consolidated net sales were approximately 63% women’s footwear, 23% men’s footwear, 9% children’s footwear and 5% accessories. This composition has remained relatively constant over the past few years. Approximately 66% of footwear sales in
2015
were retail sales, including sales through our e-commerce websites, compared to 67% in
2014
and 70% in
2013
, while the remaining 34%, 33% and 30% in the respective years represented wholesale sales.
Employees
We had approximately 11,000 full-time and part-time employees as of
January 30, 2016
. In the United States, there are no employees subject to union contracts. In Canada, we employ approximately 20 warehouse employees under a union contract, which expires in October 2016.
Competition
With many companies operating retail shoe stores and shoe departments, we compete in a highly fragmented market. Competitors include local, regional and national shoe store chains, department stores, discount stores, mass merchandisers, numerous independent retail operators of various sizes and e-commerce businesses. Quality of products and services, store location, trend-right merchandise selection and availability of brands, pricing, advertising and consumer service are all factors that impact retail competition.
In addition, our wholesale customers also sell shoes purchased from competing footwear suppliers. Those competing footwear suppliers own and license brands, many of which are well-known and marketed aggressively. Many retailers, who are our wholesale customers, source directly from factories or through agents. The wholesale footwear business has low barriers to entry, which further intensifies competition.
|
FAMOUS FOOTWEAR
|
Our Famous Footwear segment includes our Famous Footwear stores and Famous.com, and included our Shoes.com subsidiary prior to its sale in December 2014, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Famous Footwear is one of America’s leading family-branded footwear retailers with
1,046
stores at the end of
2015
and net sales of
$1.6 billion
in
2015
. Our core consumers are women who seek leading national brands of casual, athletic and fashionable footwear at a value for themselves and their families.
Famous Footwear stores feature a wide selection of brand-name athletic, casual and dress shoes for the entire family. Brands carried include, among others, Nike, Skechers, Converse, Vans, adidas, Sperry, New Balance, Asics, Bearpaw and Sof Sole, as well as company-owned and licensed brands including, among others, LifeStride, Dr. Scholl’s, Naturalizer, Fergalicious and Carlos by Carlos Santana. Our company-owned and licensed products are sold to our Famous Footwear segment by our Brand Portfolio segment at a profit and represent approximately 9% of the Famous Footwear segment's net sales. We work closely with our vendors to provide our consumers with fresh product and, in some cases, product exclusively designed for and available only in our stores. Famous Footwear’s average retail price is approximately $45 for footwear with retail price points typically ranging from $25 for shoes up to $210 for boots.
Famous Footwear stores are located in strip shopping centers as well as outlet and regional malls in all 50 states, Guam and Canada. The breakdown by venue at the end of each of the last three fiscal years is as follows:
4
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||
|
Strip centers
|
697
|
|
696
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
Outlet malls
|
189
|
|
183
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
Regional malls
|
160
|
|
159
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
Total
|
1,046
|
|
1,038
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
Stores open at the end of
2015
and
2014
averaged approximately 6,700 square feet. Total square footage at the end of
2015
decreased 0.1% to
6.9 million
square feet compared to
7.0 million
at the end of
2014
. We expect to open approximately 55 new stores and close approximately 40 stores in
2016
. New stores typically experience an initial start-up period characterized by lower sales and operating earnings than what is generally achieved by more mature stores. While the duration of this start-up period may vary by type of store, economic environment and geographic location, new stores typically reach a normal level of profitability within approximately four years.
Sales per square foot were
$217
in
2015
, up from
$215
in
2014
. Same-store sales increased
1.9%
during
2015
. Same-store sales changes are calculated by comparing the sales in stores that have been open at least 13 months. Relocated stores are treated as new stores and closed stores are excluded from the calculation. Sales change from new and closed stores, net, reflects the change in net sales due to stores that have been opened or closed during the period and are thereby excluded from the same-store sales calculation. E-commerce sales for those e-commerce websites that function as an extension of a retail chain are included in the same-store sales calculation.
Famous Footwear relies on merchandise allocation systems and processes that use allocation criteria, consumer segmentation and inventory data in an effort to ensure stores are adequately stocked with product and to differentiate the needs of each store based on location, consumer segmentation and other factors. Famous Footwear’s distribution systems allow for merchandise to be delivered to each store weekly, or on a more frequent basis, as needed. Famous Footwear also uses regional third-party pooled distribution sites across the country. Famous Footwear’s in-store point-of-sale systems provide detailed sales transaction data to our corporate office for daily update and analysis in the perpetual inventory and merchandise allocation systems. Certain of these systems also are used for training employees and communication between the stores and the corporate office.
Famous Footwear’s marketing programs include digital marketing and social networking, national television, print, e-commerce advertising, cinema and in-store advertisements, all of which are designed to further develop and reinforce the Famous Footwear concept and strengthen our connection with consumers. We believe the success of our campaigns is attributable to highlighting key categories and tailoring the timing of such messaging to adapt to seasonal shopping patterns. In
2015
, we spent approximately $52.6 million to advertise and market Famous Footwear to our target consumers, a portion of which was recovered from suppliers. Famous Footwear has a robust loyalty program (“Rewards”), which informs and rewards frequent consumers with product previews, earned incentives based upon purchase continuity and other periodic promotional offers. In
2015
, approximately 74% of our Famous Footwear net sales were generated by our Rewards members compared to 73% in 2014. During the year, we expanded our efforts to connect with and engage our consumers to build a strong brand preference for Famous Footwear through both our loyalty program and social media. In
2015
, we grew our mobile application and had more than 794,000 members enrolled by the end of the year. In
2016
, we will continue to intensify our digital marketing presence to acquire and retain highly valuable consumers.
As part of our omni-channel approach to reach consumers, we also operate Famous.com. Famous.com offers an expanded product assortment beyond what is sold in Famous Footwear stores. Accessible via desktop, tablet and mobile devices, Famous.com helps consumers explore product assortments, including items available in local stores, and make direct-to-consumer purchases. During 2015, we reduced the average delivery time for direct-to-consumer purchases by expanding our in-store fulfillment initiative to approximately 900 stores. Famous.com also allows Rewards members to see their points status and purchase history, manage profile settings and engage further with the brand. Famous Footwear’s mobile app further serves as a hub for Rewards members to shop, find local stores, redeem Rewards certificates, and learn about the newest products, latest trends and hottest deals.
We are investing in our logistics network to meet the omni-channel demands of today, including faster order processing and faster delivery to our customers, as well as to prepare for ongoing growth in our business. The expansion and modernization projects at our distribution centers are intended to provide additional shipping flexibility, operational efficiencies and an expansion of our logistics infrastructure capacity. These projects are anticipated to be complete during the fall of 2016.
Until December 2014, we owned and operated Shoes.com, Inc., a pure-play Internet retailing company. Shoes.com offered a diverse selection of footwear and accessories for women, men and children, including footwear purchased from third-party suppliers and the Company's other brands. As further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, we sold Shoes.com in December 2014 and recognized a gain on sale of $4.7 million.
5
|
BRAND PORTFOLIO
|
Our Brand Portfolio segment offers retailers and consumers a portfolio of leading brands from our Healthy Living and Contemporary Fashion platforms by designing, sourcing and marketing branded footwear for women and men at a variety of price points. Certain of our branded footwear products are sold under brand names that are owned by the Company and others are developed pursuant to licensing agreements. Our Brand Portfolio segment sells footwear on a wholesale basis to retailers. The segment also sells footwear through our branded retail stores and e-commerce businesses.
Portfolio of Brands
The following is a listing of our principal brands and licensed products:
Healthy Living
Naturalizer: Introduced in 1927, Naturalizer has become a global family of comfort lifestyle footwear brands meeting the needs of women across the marketplace with uncompromising comfort, fit and style. Our flagship Naturalizer brand is sold throughout the United States and Canada, primarily at Naturalizer retail stores, national chains, online retailers, department stores, catalog retailers and independent retailers. At the end of
2015
, we operated 159 Naturalizer stores in the United States, Guam and Canada. Naturalizer footwear is also distributed through approximately 40 retail and wholesale partners in 57 countries around the world. In addition, Naturalizer footwear is distributed in China through stores operated by our joint venture partner, C. banner International Holdings Limited (“CBI”). CBI operated 94 stores at the end of
2015
and expects net store openings of approximately 10 stores in
2016
. Through our majority-owned subsidiary, B&H Footwear Company Limited (“B&H Footwear”), we sell footwear to CBI on a wholesale basis, as further discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements. Suggested retail price points range from $79 for shoes to $209 for boots.
Dr. Scholl’s: Dr. Scholl’s is an authentic brand of innovative footwear designed with an uncomplicated, playful style for a healthier life. Dr. Scholl’s delivers proprietary comfort technology across all distribution tiers. Dr. Scholl’s crafts unique styles that offer men and women the freedom to live active lives. This footwear reaches consumers at a wide range of distribution channels: mass merchandisers, national chains, online and catalogs, specialty and independent retailers, department stores and our Famous Footwear retail stores. Suggested price points range from $25 for shoes to $200 for boots. We have a long-term license agreement with Bayer HealthCare, LLC to sell Dr. Scholl’s, which is renewable through December 2026 for the United States and Canada and December 2017 for Latin America.
LifeStride: For more than 70 years, LifeStride has created quality footwear for women who value style and comfort. Offering work-to-weekend styles, LifeStride is both versatile and comfortable for all-day wear. LifeStride offers comfortable footwear that dresses up or down at the right value. The brand is sold in national chains, our Famous Footwear retail stores, online and department stores at suggested retail price points ranging from $45 for shoes to $100 for boots.
Ryka: For over 25 years, Ryka has been innovating athletic footwear exclusively for women by providing women with more than just a downsized version of a men’s athletic shoe. The brand’s commitment goes beyond footwear design to include fitness and other apparel. The brand is distributed through department stores, national chains, online retailers and our Famous Footwear retail stores at suggested retail price points from $35 to $85.
Bzees: Bzees is the brand of women’s sporty footwear that energizes the mind and body from the feet up. Playful and versatile, Bzees delivers a weightless and energized feeling through its proprietary Cloud Technology system. The brand is distributed through national chains, our retail stores, online retailers, department stores and Bzees.com at suggested retail price points from $59 to $129.
Contemporary Fashion
Sam Edelman: Since its inception in 2004, designer Sam Edelman’s brand has quickly emerged as a favorite among celebrities and fashionistas around the globe. Sam Edelman captures the imagination of women with on-trend styling and unique materials. Sam Edelman continues to expand its retail presence by opening additional stores. At the end of
2015
, we operated six Sam Edelman stores in the United States, and expect to open six stores in
2016
. Sam Edelman footwear is sold primarily through department stores, independent retailers and online at suggested retail price points of $100 for shoes to $200 for boots.
Franco Sarto: The Franco Sarto brand serves a loyal, career-focused consumer who is passionate about the brand’s modern Italian-inspired style, fit and quality. The brand is sold in major national chains, department stores and independent retailers at suggested retail price points from $79 for shoes to $275 for boots. We previously operated this brand under a license agreement which was to expire in 2019. In February 2014, we purchased the Franco Sarto trademarks for $65.0 million and terminated the license agreement, as further discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
6
Vince: The Vince women's shoe collection launched in the fall of 2012 and was expanded in 2014 to include the Vince men's footwear collection. Vince delivers contemporary casual footwear that sophisticated, modern women and men wear effortlessly, serving as a luxury staple in their shoe closet. The collection is distinguished by clean lines, rich fabrics and intricate details. The brand is primarily sold in premier department stores, online and independent retailers at suggested price points ranging from $225 for shoes to $495 for boots. We have a license agreement with Vince, LLC to sell Vince footwear that expires in December 2018.
Diane von Furstenberg: The Diane von Furstenberg (DVF) brand is a staple of American luxury design. The DVF collection exemplifies feminine, effortless and classic styles that are sold in more than 55 countries worldwide. Suggested price points range from $178 for shoes to $648 for boots. In December 2014, we entered into a license agreement with DVF Studio, LLC to produce and distribute the DVF women's shoe collection, which expires in December 2020, with an extension option through December 2023.
Via Spiga: Via Spiga is named after the main street in one of the most famed shopping districts in Milan, Italy. For over 25 years, Via Spiga has maintained its rich Italian heritage through its use of luxurious materials and beautiful detailing, providing chic, sophisticated footwear for the cosmopolitan woman who wants to make a fashion statement every day. The brand is primarily sold in premier department stores, national chains and online at suggested retail price points from $150 for shoes to $595 for boots.
Fergie and Fergalicious by Fergie: We have created two namesake footwear lines in collaboration with entertainment superstar Fergie (Fergie Duhamel, formerly Stacy Ferguson) to fully capture the artist’s confident, individual style in a line of sophisticated, sexy footwear with a glam rock influence. The Fergie brand is currently being sold at department stores, boutiques, independent retailers and online at suggested retail price points of $70 for shoes to $225 for boots. Fergalicious by Fergie is available at Famous Footwear and other national chains at suggested retail price points of $45 for shoes to $100 for boots. We have a license agreement with Krystal Ball Productions to sell Fergie/Fergalicious footwear that expires in December 2016.
Carlos by Carlos Santana: The Carlos by Carlos Santana collection of women’s footwear is sold at major department stores, national chains, our Famous Footwear stores and online. Marketed under a license agreement with legendary musician Carlos Santana, this brand targets trend-conscious consumers with hot, fashionable shoes inspired by the passion and energy of Santana’s music. Suggested retail price points range from $80 for shoes to $225 for boots. We have a license agreement with Santana Tesoro, LLC to sell Carlos by Carlos Santana footwear that expires in December 2017 with extension options through December 2020.
George Brown: George Brown, the newest men's footwear brand in our portfolio, will debut in the fall of 2016. The line takes inspiration from two key moments in George Brown’s legacy - the boots he built for the United States Army during World War I and his farming and hunting boots. The shoes are for the modern man who is now embracing the return of clean dressing. Suggested retail price points will range from $295 for shoes to $595 for boots, and will sell at traditional brick and mortar stores and online retailers as well as its own e-commerce site that is anticipated to launch in the summer of 2016.
Wholesale
Within our Brand Portfolio segment, footwear is distributed on a wholesale basis to over 1,700 retailers, including national chains, department stores, online retailers, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs throughout the United States and Canada, as well as approximately 65 other countries (including sales to our retail operations). Our most significant wholesale customers include Famous Footwear and many of the nation’s largest retailers including national chains such as DSW, TJX Corporation (including TJ Maxx and Marshalls), Nordstrom Rack and Ross; department stores such as Nordstrom, Macy’s, Bloomingdale's and Dillard's; online retailers such as Nordstrom.com, Zappos.com and Amazon; mass merchandisers such as Walmart and Target; and independent retailers such as QVC and Home Shopping Network. We also sell product to a variety of international retail customers and distributors. The loss of any one or more of our significant customers could have a material negative impact on our Brand Portfolio segment and the Company.
Our Brand Portfolio segment sold approximately 48 million pairs of shoes on a wholesale basis during
2015
. We sell footwear to wholesale customers on both a landed and a first-cost basis. Landed sales are those in which we obtain title to the footwear from our overseas suppliers and maintain title until the footwear clears United States customs and is shipped to our wholesale customers. Landed sales generally carry a higher profit rate than first-cost sales as a result of the brand equity associated with the product along with the additional customs, warehousing and logistics services provided to customers and the risks associated with inventory ownership. To allow for the prompt shipment on reorders, we carry inventories of certain styles. First-cost sales are those in which we obtain title to footwear from our overseas suppliers and typically relinquish title to customers at a designated overseas port. Many of these customers then import this product into the United States.
7
Products sold under license agreements accounted for approximately 27%, 26% and 38% of the sales of the Brand Portfolio segment in 2015,
2014
and
2013
, respectively. Caleres also receives royalty revenues for licensing owned brands, including certain brands listed above, to third parties.
Retail
Our Brand Portfolio segment also includes retail stores for certain brands, including Naturalizer and Sam Edelman. The number of our Brand Portfolio retail stores at the end of the last three fiscal years was as follows:
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||
|
Naturalizer
|
159
|
|
169
|
|
174
|
|
|||
|
Sam Edelman
|
6
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
|||
|
Dr. Scholl’s
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
165
|
|
171
|
|
179
|
|
|||
At the end of 2015, we operated 74 Naturalizer stores in the United States (including a store in Guam) and 85 Naturalizer stores in Canada. Of the 159 Naturalizer stores, approximately 50% are concept stores located in regional malls, with a couple stores located in strip centers, and average approximately 1,200 square feet in size. The other 50% of stores are located in outlet malls and average approximately 2,300 square feet in size. Total Naturalizer store square footage at the end of
2015
was 280,000 compared to 297,000 in
2014
. During
2016
, we expect to open one Naturalizer store and close five stores. At the end of 2015 we operated six Sam Edelman stores. During
2016
, we plan to open six Sam Edelman stores, as we expand our retail presence for this brand. Our four Dr. Scholl’s stores were closed in 2014, as we shifted our brand focus toward wholesale distribution and e-commerce sales.
In connection with our omni-channel approach to reach consumers, we also operate Naturalizer.com, Naturalizer.ca, Ryka.com,
DrSchollsShoes.com, LifeStride.com, ViaSpiga.com, SamEdelman.com, CarlosShoes.com, Bzees.com and FergieShoes.com, which offer substantially the same product selection to consumers as we sell to our retail partners. Vince.com and DVF.com complement our distribution of those brands, and we have plans to begin selling product on FrancoSarto.com in the second quarter of 2016.
References to our website addresses do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the websites and the information contained on the websites is not part of this report.
Marketing
We continue to build on the recognition of our portfolio of brands to create differentiation and consumer loyalty. Our marketing teams are responsible for the development and implementation of marketing programs for each brand, both for us and for our retail partners. In
2015
, we spent approximately $24.1 million in advertising and marketing support for our Brand Portfolio segment, including print, trade shows, consumer media advertising, production, digital marketing and social media, public relations and in-store displays and fixtures. The marketing teams are also responsible for driving the development of branding and content for our brand websites. We continually focus on enhancing the effectiveness of these marketing efforts through market research, product development and marketing communications that collectively address the ever-changing lives and needs of our consumers. In
2015
, the marketing teams were instrumental in the development and execution of new product launches, including branding, positioning and marketing to both the consumer and trade audiences. In 2016, we will continue to leverage relationships by strengthening business with our key customers and increase market share by targeting new growth areas.
Sourcing and Product Development Operations
Our sourcing and product development operations source and develop footwear for our Brand Portfolio segment and also a portion of the footwear sold by our Famous Footwear segment. We have sourcing and product development offices in China, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Italy, Macau, Ethiopia, St. Louis and New York.
Sourcing Operations
In
2015
, the sourcing operations sourced approximately 47 million pairs of shoes through a global network of third-party independent footwear manufacturers. The majority of our footwear sourced is provided by approximately 60 manufacturers operating approximately 87 manufacturing facilities. In certain countries, we use agents to facilitate and manage the development, production and shipment of product. We attribute our ability to achieve consistent quality, competitive prices and on-time delivery to the breadth of these established relationships. While we generally do not have significant contractual commitments with our suppliers, we do enter into sourcing agreements with certain independent sourcing agents. Prior to production, we monitor the quality of all of our footwear components and also inspect the prototypes of each footwear style. We have a leading lab testing facility in our Putian, China office, and we also perform quality control checks during production and before any footwear leaves the manufacturing facilities.
8
In
2015
, approximately 76% of the footwear we sourced was from manufacturing facilities in China. The following table provides an overview of our foreign sourcing in
2015
:
|
Country
|
Millions of Pairs
|
|
|
China
|
35.8
|
|
|
Vietnam
|
9.1
|
|
|
Ethiopia
|
0.8
|
|
|
Other
|
1.6
|
|
|
Total
|
47.3
|
|
Product Development Operations
In our Dongguan, China office, we operate a sample-making facility that allows us to have greater control over our product development in terms of accuracy, execution and time to market. We maintain design and product development teams for our brands in St. Louis, New York and China as well as other select fashion locations, including Italy. These teams, which include independent designers, are responsible for the creation and development of new product styles. Our designers monitor trends in fashion footwear and apparel and work closely with retailers to identify consumer footwear preferences. Our design teams create collections of footwear and work closely with our product development and sourcing offices to convert our designs into new footwear styles.
Our long-range plans include further expansion into new markets outside of China, developing more progressive processes to improve factory capacity and material planning, and continuing to understand ways to drive excellence in product value and execution in a continually evolving manufacturing landscape.
Backlog
At
January 30, 2016
, our Brand Portfolio segment had a backlog of unfilled wholesale orders of approximately
$274.4 million
compared to
$284.6 million
on
January 31, 2015
. Most orders are for delivery within the next 90 to 120 days, and although orders are subject to cancellation, we have not experienced significant cancellations in the past. The backlog at any particular time is affected by a number of factors, including seasonality, the continuing trend among customers to reduce the lead time on their orders, capacity shifts at foreign manufacturers and the volume of e-commerce drop ship orders that are received immediately rather than in advance. Accordingly, a comparison of backlog from period to period is not necessarily meaningful and may not be indicative of eventual actual shipments or the growth rate of sales from one period to the next.
|
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
|
Our Internet address is www.caleres.com. Our Internet address is included in this annual report on Form 10-K as an inactive textual reference only. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. We make available free of charge our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished, as required by Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, through our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with or furnish it to the SEC. You may access these SEC filings via the hyperlink to a third-party SEC filings website that we provide on our website.
|
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
|
The following is a list of the names and ages of the executive officers of the Company and of the offices held by each person. There is no family relationship between any of the named persons. The terms of the following executive officers will expire in May
2016
or upon their respective successors being chosen and qualified.
9
|
Name
|
Age
|
Current Position
|
|
Diane M. Sullivan
|
60
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
Richard M. Ausick
|
62
|
Division President – Famous Footwear
|
|
Daniel R. Friedman
|
55
|
Division President – Global Supply Chain
|
|
Kenneth H. Hannah
|
47
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Douglas W. Koch
|
64
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
|
|
John W. Schmidt
|
55
|
Division President – Brand Portfolio
|
|
Mark A. Schmitt
|
52
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer, Logistics and Customer Care
|
The period of service of each officer in the positions listed and other business experience are set forth below.
Diane M. Sullivan,
Chairman of the Board of Directors since February 2014. Chief Executive Officer and President since May 2011. President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2006 to May 2011. President from January 2004 to March 2006.
Richard M. Ausick
, Division President – Famous Footwear since January 2010. Division President, Caleres Wholesale from July 2006 to January 2010. Senior Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer of Famous Footwear from January 2002 to July 2006.
Daniel R. Friedman
, Division President – Global Supply Chain since January 2010. Senior Vice President, Product Development and Sourcing from July 2006 to January 2010. Managing Director at Camuto Group, Inc. from 2002 to July 2006.
Kenneth H. Hannah,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February 2015. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of JC Penney Company, Inc. from May 2012 to March 2014. Executive Vice President and President–Solar Energy of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. and had previously served as Executive Vice President and President–Solar Materials from 2009 to 2012. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. from 2006 to 2009.
Douglas W. Koch,
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since January 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Talent and Strategy Officer from January 2011 to January 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Talent Officer from May 2005 to January 2011. Senior Vice President, Human Resources from March 2002 to May 2005.
John W. Schmidt
, Division President - Brand Portfolio since October 2015. Division President – Contemporary Fashion Brands from January 2011 to September 2015. Senior Vice President, Better and Image Brands from January 2010 to January 2011. Senior Vice President and General Manager, Better and Image Brands from March 2008 until January 2010. Various positions, including Vice President, President, Group President of Wholesale Footwear for Nine West Group from September 1998 to February 2008.
Mark A. Schmitt,
Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer, Logistics and Customer Care since February 2013. Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from January 2012 through February 2013. Senior Director of Management Information Systems for Express Scripts from 2010 through 2011. Various management information systems positions including Group Director with Anheuser-Busch InBev from 1996 to 2009.
|
ITEM 1A
|
RISK FACTORS
|
Consumer demand for our products may be adversely impacted by economic conditions and other factors.
Worldwide economic conditions continue to be uncertain. Consumer confidence and spending are strongly influenced by general economic conditions and other factors, including fiscal policy, changing tax and regulatory environment, interest rates, minimum wage rates, inflation, consumer debt levels, the availability of consumer credit, the liquidity of consumers’ assets, health care costs, currency exchange rates, taxation, energy costs, real estate values, foreclosure rates, unemployment trends, weather conditions, and the economic consequences of military action or terrorist activities. Negative economic conditions generally decrease disposable income and, consequently, consumer purchases of discretionary items like our products. Negative trends in economic conditions could also drive up the cost of our products, which may require us to increase our product prices. These increases in our product costs, and possibly prices, may not be offset by comparable increases in consumer disposable income. As a result, our customers may choose to purchase fewer of our products or purchase the lower-priced products of our competitors, and our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
10
If we are unable to anticipate and respond to consumer preferences and fashion trends and successfully apply new technology, we may not be able to maintain or increase our net sales and earnings.
The footwear industry is subject to rapidly changing consumer demands and fashion trends. Our products must appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are subject to rapid change. Accordingly, the success of both our wholesale and retail operations, including the expansion of our e-commerce business, depends largely on our ability to anticipate, understand and react to changing consumer demands and preferences. If we fail to successfully anticipate and respond to changes in consumer demand and fashion trends, develop new products and designs, and implement effective, responsive merchandising and marketing strategies and programs, we could experience lower sales, excess inventories and lower gross margins, any of which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We operate in a highly competitive industry.
Competition is intense in the footwear industry. Certain of our competitors are larger and have greater financial, marketing and technological resources than we do; others are able to offer footwear on a lateral basis alongside their apparel products; and others have successfully branded their trademarks as lifestyle brands, resulting in greater competitive advantages. Low barriers to entry into this industry further intensify competition by allowing new companies to easily enter the markets in which we compete. Some of our suppliers further compound these competitive pressures by allowing consumers to purchase their products directly through supplier-maintained Internet sites and retail stores. In addition, retailers aggressively compete on the basis of price, which puts competitive pressure on us to keep our prices low.
We believe that our ability to compete successfully in the footwear industry depends on a number of factors, including style, price, performance, quality, location and service, as well as the strength of our brand names. We remain competitive by increasing awareness of our brands, improving the efficiency of our supply chain and enhancing the style, comfort, fashion and perceived value of our products. However, our competitors may implement more effective marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, make more attractive offers to potential employees, distribution partners and manufacturers, or respond more quickly to changes in consumer preferences than us. As a result, we may not be able to compete successfully in the future, and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins, loss of market share and an inability to generate cash flows that are sufficient to maintain or expand the development and marketing of our products, which could adversely impact our financial results.
We rely on foreign sources of production, which subjects our business to risks associated with international trade.
We rely on foreign sourcing for our footwear products through third-party manufacturing facilities located outside the United States. As is common in the industry, we do not have any long-term contracts with our third-party foreign manufacturers. Foreign sourcing is subject to numerous risks, including trade relations, work stoppages, transportation delays (including delays at foreign and domestic ports) and costs (including customs duties, quotas, tariffs, anti-dumping duties, safeguard measures, cargo restrictions or other trade restrictions), political instability, foreign currency fluctuations, variable economic conditions, expropriation, nationalization, natural disasters, terrorist acts and military conflict and changes in governmental regulations (including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act). At the same time, potential changes in manufacturing preferences, including, but not limited to the following, pose additional risk and uncertainty:
|
•
|
Manufacturing capacity may shift from footwear to other industries with manufacturing margins that are perceived to be higher.
|
|
•
|
Some footwear manufacturers may face labor shortages as workers seek better wages and working conditions in other industries and locations.
|
As a result of these risks, there can be no assurance that we will not experience reductions in available production capacity, increases in our manufacturing costs, late deliveries or terminations of our supplier relationships. Furthermore, these sourcing risks are compounded by the lack of diversification in the geographic location of our foreign sourcing and manufacturing. With the majority of our supply originating in China, a substantial portion of our supply could be at risk in the event of any significant negative development related to China.
Although we believe we could find alternative manufacturing sources for the products that we currently source from third-party manufacturing facilities in China or other countries, we may not be able to locate alternative manufacturers on terms as favorable as our current terms, including pricing, payment terms, manufacturing capacity, quality standards and lead times for delivery. In addition, there is substantial competition in the footwear industry for quality footwear manufacturers. Accordingly, our future results will partly depend on our ability to maintain positive working relationships with, and offer competitive terms to, our foreign manufacturers. If supply issues cause us to be unable to provide products consistent with our standards or manufacture our footwear in a cost and time efficient manner, our customers may cancel orders, refuse to accept deliveries or demand reductions in purchase prices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our operating results depend on preparing accurate sales forecasts and properly managing our inventory levels.
Using sales forecasts, we place orders with manufacturers for some of our products prior to the time we receive all of our customers’ orders to minimize purchasing costs, the time necessary to fill customer orders and the risk of non-delivery. We also maintain an inventory of
11
certain products that we anticipate will be in greater demand. At the retail level, we place orders for product many months in advance of our key selling seasons. Adverse economic conditions and rapidly changing consumer preferences can make it difficult for us and our retail customers to accurately forecast product trends in order to match production with demand. If we fail to accurately assess consumer fashion tastes and the impact of economic factors on consumer spending or to effectively differentiate our retail and wholesale offerings, our inventory levels may exceed customer demand, resulting in inventory write-downs, higher carrying costs, lower gross margins or the sale of excess inventory at discounted prices, which could significantly impact our financial results. Conversely, if we underestimate consumer demand for our products or if our manufacturers fail to supply the quality products that we require in a timely manner, we may experience inventory shortages. Inventory shortages may delay shipments to customers (and possibly require us to offer discounts or costly expedited shipping), negatively impact retailer and distributor relationships, adversely impact our sales results and diminish brand awareness and loyalty.
A cybersecurity breach may adversely affect our sales and reputation.
We routinely possess sensitive consumer and associate information. We also provide certain customer and employee data to third parties for analysis, benefit distribution or compliance purposes. While we believe we have taken reasonable and appropriate steps to protect that information, hackers and data thieves operate sophisticated, large-scale attacks that could breach our information systems, despite ongoing security measures. In addition, we are required to comply with increasingly complex regulations designed to protect our business and personal data. Any breach of our network security, a third-party’s network security or failure to comply with applicable regulations may result in (a) the loss of valuable business data and/or our consumers’ or associates’ personal information, (b) increased costs associated with implementing additional protections and processes, (c) a disruption of our business and a loss of sales, (d) negative media attention, (e) damage to our consumer and associate relationships and reputation, and (f) fines or lawsuits.
We are reliant upon our information technology systems, and any major disruption of these systems could adversely impact our ability to effectively operate our business.
Our computer network and systems are essential to all aspects of our operations, including design, pricing, production, forecasting, ordering, manufacturing, transportation, sales and distribution. Our ability to manage and maintain our inventory and to deliver products in a timely manner depends on these systems. If any of these systems fails to operate as expected, we experience problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, a breach in security occurs or a natural disaster interrupts system functions, we may experience delays in product fulfillment and reduced efficiency in our operations or be required to expend significant capital to correct the problem, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Customer concentration and other trends in customer behavior may lead to a reduction in or loss of sales.
Our wholesale customers include national chains, department stores, online retailers, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs. Several of our customers operate multiple department store divisions. Furthermore, we often sell multiple types of branded, licensed and private-label footwear to these same customers. While we believe purchasing decisions in many cases are made independently by the buyers and merchandisers of each of the customers, a decision by a significant customer to decrease the amount of footwear products purchased from us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In addition, with the growing trend toward retail trade consolidation, we and our wholesale customers increasingly depend upon a reduced number of key retailers whose bargaining strength is growing. This consolidation may result in the following adverse consequences:
|
•
|
Our wholesale customers may seek more favorable terms for their purchases of our products, which could limit our ability to raise prices, recoup cost increases or achieve our profit goals.
|
|
•
|
The number of stores that carry our products could decline, thereby exposing us to a greater concentration of accounts receivable risk and negatively impacting our brand visibility.
|
We also face the following risks with respect to our customers:
|
•
|
Our customers could develop in-house brands or use a higher mix of private-label footwear products, which would negatively impact our sales.
|
|
•
|
As we sell our products to customers and extend credit based on an evaluation of each customer’s financial condition, the financial difficulties of a customer could cause us to stop doing business with that customer, reduce our business with that customer or be unable to collect from that customer.
|
|
•
|
Since we transact primarily in United States dollars, our international customers could purchase from competitors who will transact business in their local currency.
|
|
•
|
If any of our major wholesale customers experiences a significant downturn in its business or fails to remain committed to our products or brands, then these customers may reduce or discontinue purchases from us.
|
12
|
•
|
Retailers are directly sourcing more of their products directly from foreign manufacturers and reducing their reliance on wholesalers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
|
A disruption in the effective functioning of our distribution centers could adversely affect our ability to deliver inventory on a timely basis.
We currently use several distribution centers, which are leased or third-party managed. These distribution centers serve as the source of replenishment of inventory for our footwear stores and e-commerce websites operated by our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments and serve the wholesale operations of our Brand Portfolio segment. We may be unable to successfully manage, negotiate or renew our third-party distribution center agreements, or we may experience complications with respect to our distribution centers, such as substantial damage to, or destruction of, such facilities due to natural disasters or ineffective information technology systems. In such an event, our other distribution centers may not be able to support the resulting additional distribution demands and we may be unable to locate alternative persons or entities capable of fulfilling our distribution needs, resulting in an adverse effect on our ability to deliver inventory on a timely basis.
Our success depends on our ability to retain senior management and recruit and retain other key associates.
Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified management, administrative, product development and sales personnel to support existing operations and future growth. In addition, our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses often depends on our ability to retain incumbent personnel, many of whom possess valuable institutional knowledge and operating experience. Competition for qualified personnel in the footwear industry is intense and we compete for these individuals with other companies that in many cases have superior financial and other resources. The loss of the services of any member of our senior management or key associates, the inability to attract and retain other qualified personnel or the inability to effectively transition positions could adversely affect the sales, design and production of our products as well as the implementation of our strategic initiatives.
Foreign currency fluctuations may result in higher costs and decreased gross profits.
Although we purchase most of our products from foreign manufacturers in United States dollars and otherwise engage in foreign currency hedging transactions, we cannot ensure that we will not experience cost variations with respect to exchange rate changes. Currency exchange rate fluctuations may also adversely impact third parties who manufacture the Company’s products by making their purchases of raw materials or other production costs more expensive and more difficult to finance, resulting in higher prices and lower margins for the Company, its distributors and licensees.
Our business, sales and brand value could be harmed by violations of labor, trade or other laws.
We focus on doing business with those suppliers who share our commitment to responsible business practices and the principles set forth in our Production Code of Conduct (the “PCOC”). By requiring our suppliers to comply with the PCOC, we encourage our suppliers to promote best practices and work toward continual improvement throughout their production operations. The PCOC sets forth standards for working conditions and other matters, including compliance with applicable labor practices, workplace environment and compliance with laws. Although we promote ethical business practices, we do not control our suppliers or their labor practices. A failure by any of our suppliers to adhere to these standards or laws could cause us to incur additional costs for our products, could cause negative publicity and harm our business and reputation. We also require our suppliers to meet our standards for product safety, including compliance with applicable laws and standards with respect to safety issues, including lead content in paint. Failure by any of our suppliers to adhere to product safety standards could lead to a product recall, which may result in critical media coverage, harm our business and reputation, and cause us to incur additional costs.
In addition, if we, or our suppliers or foreign manufacturers, violate United States or foreign trade laws or regulations, we may be subject to additional duties, significant monetary penalties, the seizure and forfeiture of the products we are attempting to import or the loss of our import privileges. Possible violations of United States or foreign laws or regulations could include inadequate record keeping of our imported products, misstatements or errors as to the origin, classification, marketing or valuation of our imported products, fraudulent visas or labor violations. The effects of these factors could render our conduct of business in a particular country undesirable or impractical and have a negative impact on our operating results.
Our retail business depends on our ability to secure affordable and desirable leased locations without creating a competitive concentration of stores.
The success of the retail business within our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments depends, in part, on our ability to secure affordable, long-term leases in desirable locations for our leased retail footwear stores and to secure renewals of such leases. No assurance can be given that we will be able to successfully negotiate lease renewals for existing stores or obtain acceptable terms for new stores in desirable locations. In addition, opening new Famous Footwear stores in our existing markets may result in reduced net sales in existing
13
stores as our stores become more concentrated in the markets we serve. As a result, the number of consumers and financial performance of individual stores may decline and the average sales per square foot at our stores may be reduced.
If we are unable to maintain working relationships with our major branded suppliers, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely impacted.
Our Famous Footwear segment purchases a substantial portion of its footwear products from major branded suppliers. Purchases from two major branded suppliers, Nike, Inc. and Skechers USA, Inc., collectively comprise approximately 23% and 13%, respectively, of sales for the Famous Footwear segment. As is common in the industry, we do not have any long-term contracts with our suppliers. In addition, the success of our financial performance is dependent on the ability of our Famous Footwear segment to obtain products from our suppliers on a timely basis and on acceptable terms. While we believe our relationships with our current suppliers are good, the loss of any of our major suppliers or product developed exclusively for our Famous Footwear stores could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, negative trends in global economic conditions may adversely impact our suppliers. If these third parties do not perform their obligations or are unable to provide us with the materials and services we need at prices and terms that are acceptable to us, our ability to meet our consumers’ demand could be adversely affected.
Our reputation and competitive position are dependent on our ability to license well-recognized brands, license our own brands under successful licensing arrangements and protect our intellectual property rights.
Licenses - Company as Licensee
Although we own most of our wholesale brands, we also rely on our ability to attract, retain and maintain good relationships with licensors that have strong, well-recognized brands and trademarks. Our license agreements are generally for an initial term of two to four years, subject to renewal, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew these licenses. Even our longer-term or renewable licenses are typically dependent upon our ability to market and sell the licensed products at specified levels, and the failure to meet such levels may result in the termination or non-renewal of such licenses. Furthermore, many of our license agreements require minimum royalty payments, and if we are unable to generate sufficient sales and profitability to cover these minimum royalty requirements, we may be required to make additional payments to the licensors that could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, because certain of our license agreements are non-exclusive, new or existing competitors may obtain licenses with overlapping product or geographic terms, resulting in increased competition for a particular market.
Licenses - Company as Licensor
We have entered into numerous license agreements with respect to the brands and trademarks that we own. While we have significant control over our licensees’ products and advertising, we generally cannot control their operational and financial issues. If our licensees are not able to meet annual sales and royalty goals, obtain financing, manage their supply chain, control quality and maintain positive relationships with their customers, our business, results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected. While we would likely have the ability to terminate an underperforming license, it may be difficult and costly to locate an acceptable substitute distributor or licensee, and we may experience a disruption in our sales and brand visibility. In addition, although many of our license agreements prohibit the licensees from entering into licensing arrangements with certain of our competitors, they are generally not prohibited from offering, under other brands, the types of products covered by their license agreements with us.
Trademarks
We believe that our trademarks and trade names are important to our success and competitive position because our distinctive marks create a market for our products and distinguish our products from other products. We cannot, however, guarantee that we will be able to secure protection for our intellectual property in the future or that such protection will be adequate for future operations. Furthermore, we face the risk of ineffective protection of intellectual property rights in jurisdictions where we source and distribute our products, some of which do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the United States. If we are unsuccessful in challenging a party’s products on the basis of infringement of our intellectual property rights, continued sales of these products could adversely affect our sales, devalue our brands and result in a shift in consumer preference away from our products. We may face significant expenses and liability in connection with the protection of our intellectual property rights, and if we are unable to successfully protect our rights or resolve intellectual property conflicts with others, our business or financial condition could be adversely affected.
Changes in tax laws, policies and treaties could result in higher taxes, lower profitability, and increased volatility in our financial results.
Our financial results are significantly impacted by our effective tax rates, for both domestic and international operations. Our effective income tax rate could be adversely affected by factors such as changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in permitted deductions, changes in tax laws, interpretations, policies and treaties, the outcome of income tax audits in various jurisdictions and any repatriation of earnings from our international operations. The occurrence of such events may result in higher taxes, lower profitability and increased volatility in our financial results.
14
Our quarterly sales and earnings may fluctuate, which may result in volatility in, or a decline in, our stock price.
Our quarterly sales and earnings can vary due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
|
•
|
Our Famous Footwear retail business is seasonally weighted to the back-to-school season, which falls in our third fiscal quarter. As a result, the success of our back-to-school offering, which is affected by our ability to anticipate consumer demand and fashion trends, could have a disproportionate impact on our full year results.
|
|
•
|
In our wholesale business, sales of footwear are dependent on orders from our major customers, and they may change delivery schedules, change the mix of products they order or cancel orders without penalty.
|
|
•
|
Our wholesale customers set the delivery schedule for shipments of our products, which could cause shifts of sales between quarters.
|
|
•
|
Our estimated annual tax rate is based on projections of our domestic and international operating results for the year, which we review and revise as necessary each quarter.
|
|
•
|
Our earnings are also sensitive to a number of factors that are beyond our control, including manufacturing and transportation costs, changes in product sales mix, geographic sales trends, weather conditions, consumer sentiment and currency exchange rate fluctuations.
|
As a result of these specific and other general factors, our operating results will vary from quarter to quarter and the results for any particular quarter may not be indicative of results for the full year. Any shortfall in sales or earnings from the levels expected by investors could cause a decrease in the trading price of our common stock.
Transitional challenges with business acquisitions or divestitures could result in the inability to achieve our strategic and operating goals.
Periodically, we pursue acquisitions of other companies or businesses and divestitures of businesses. In either case, we may not achieve our strategic and operating goals through such activity. For example, although we complete due diligence on acquisition candidates, the due diligence may not reveal all existing or potential problems. As a result, we may not accurately assess the value of the business and may, accordingly, ultimately assume unknown adverse operating conditions and/or unanticipated liabilities. In addition, the acquired business may not perform as well as expected. We face the risk that the returns on acquisitions will not support the expenditures or indebtedness incurred to acquire or launch such businesses. We also face the risk that we will not be able to integrate acquisitions into our existing operations effectively. Integration of new businesses may be hindered by, among other things, differing procedures, including internal controls, business practices and technology systems. We may need to allocate more management resources to integration than we planned, which may adversely affect our ability to pursue other profitable activities. In addition, divesting a business may impede progress toward strategic and operating goals. In connection with a divestiture, we may not successfully divest a business without substantial interruption, expense, delay or other operational or financial problems, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to periodic litigation and other regulatory proceedings, which could result in the unexpected expenditure of time and resources.
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits and regulatory actions (including environmental matters) relating to our business and to our past operations. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any litigation or regulatory proceedings, such proceedings are expensive and will require that we devote substantial resources and executive time to defend, thereby diverting management’s attention and resources that are needed to successfully run our business. See Item 3,
Legal Proceedings
, for further discussion of pending matters.
A significant portion of our Famous Footwear sales are dependent on our Famous Footwear loyalty program, Rewards, and any decrease in sales from Rewards could have a material adverse impact on our sales.
Rewards is a customer loyalty program that drives sales and traffic for the Famous Footwear segment. Rewards members earn points toward savings certificates for qualifying purchases. Upon reaching specified point values, members are issued a savings certificate, which they may redeem for purchases at Famous Footwear. Approximately 74% of our fiscal 2015 sales within the Famous Footwear segment were generated by our Rewards members. If our Rewards members do not continue to shop at Famous Footwear, our sales may be adversely affected.
Our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected by the failure of financial institutions to fulfill their commitments under our Credit Agreement.
The First Amendment to our Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), which matures on December 18, 2019, is provided by a syndicate of financial institutions, with each institution agreeing severally (and not jointly) to make revolving credit loans to us in an aggregate amount of up to $600.0 million in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement provides for an increase at the Company's option by up to $150.0 million. If one or more of the financial institutions participating
15
in the Credit Agreement were to default on its obligation to fund its commitment, the portion of the facility provided by such defaulting financial institution might not be available to us.
If we are unable to maintain our credit rating, our ability to access capital and interest rates may be negatively impacted.
The credit rating agencies periodically review our capital structure and the quality and stability of our earnings. Any negative ratings actions could constrain the capital available to us or our industry and could limit our access to long-term funding or cause such access to be available at a higher borrowing cost for our operations. We are dependent upon our ability to access capital at rates and on terms we determine to be attractive. If our ability to access capital becomes constrained, our interest expense will likely increase, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
|
ITEM 1B
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
There are no unresolved written comments that were received from the SEC staff 180 days or more before the end of our fiscal year relating to our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
ITEM 2
|
PROPERTIES
|
We own our principal executive, sales and administrative offices located in Clayton (“St. Louis”), Missouri.
Our retail operations, included in both our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments, are conducted throughout the United States, Canada and Guam and involve the operation of 1,211 shoe stores, including 94 in Canada. All store locations are leased, with approximately 51% of them having renewal options. The footwear sold through our domestic wholesale business is processed through third-party facilities in either Chino, California or Clifton, New Jersey.
The following table summarizes the general location and use of the Company's primary properties:
|
Location
|
Owned/Leased
|
Segment
|
Use
|
|||
|
Clayton, Missouri
|
Owned
|
Famous Footwear, Brand Portfolio and
Other |
Principal executive, sales and administrative offices
|
|||
|
United States, Canada and Guam
|
Leased
|
Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio
|
Retail operations
|
|||
|
Lebanon, Tennessee
(1)
|
Leased
|
Famous Footwear
|
Distribution center
|
|||
|
Bakersfield, California
(2)
|
Leased
|
Famous Footwear
|
Distribution center
|
|||
|
New York, New York
|
Leased
|
Brand Portfolio
|
Office space and showrooms
|
|||
|
Bentonville, Arkansas
|
Leased
|
Brand Portfolio
|
Showrooms
|
|||
|
Dallas, Texas
|
Leased
|
Brand Portfolio
|
Showrooms
|
|||
|
Perth, Ontario
|
Owned
|
Brand Portfolio
|
Primary Canadian operations
|
|||
|
Laval, Quebec
|
Leased
|
Brand Portfolio
|
Office space
|
|||
|
China, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Ethiopia and Italy
|
Leased
|
Brand Portfolio
|
Office space
|
|||
|
Dongguan, China
|
Leased
|
Brand Portfolio
|
Sample-making facility
|
|||
|
(1)
|
This distribution center is approximately 540,000 square feet, up 210,000 square feet from 2014 due to the expansion and modernization of our distribution center.
|
|
(2)
|
This distribution center is approximately 350,000 square feet.
|
We also own a building in Denver, Colorado, which is leased to a third party; and undeveloped land in Colorado and New York. See Item 3,
Legal Proceedings
, for further discussion of certain of these properties.
|
ITEM 3
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
We are involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such ordinary course business proceedings and litigation currently pending will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
16
Our prior operations included numerous manufacturing and other facilities for which we may have responsibility under various environmental laws to address conditions that may be identified in the future. We are involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites and have been notified that we are or may be a potentially responsible party at several other sites. We are remediating, under the oversight of Colorado authorities, contamination at and beneath our owned facility in Colorado (also known as the “Redfield” site) and groundwater and indoor air in residential neighborhoods adjacent to and near the property, which have been affected by solvents previously used at the site and surrounding facilities.
During 2014, we signed a settlement agreement to resolve a putative class action lawsuit involving wage and hour claims in California for an amount not to exceed $1.5 million. In 2015, the court granted final approval of the settlement, pursuant to which the Company was required to pay $1.0 million in attorneys' fees, costs of administering the settlement and settlement payments to class members who submitted claims. All payments required under the settlement agreement were made in the fourth quarter of 2015 and this matter is fully resolved.
Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Redfield matter and other legal proceedings.
|
ITEM 4
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
Not applicable.
|
|
|
ITEM 5
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbol “CAL.” As of
January 30, 2016
, we had approximately 3,807 shareholders of record. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on the NYSE and the dividends paid per share for each fiscal quarter during
2015
and
2014
.
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividend
|
|
Dividend
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Paid
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Paid
|
|
||||||||||||
|
1st Quarter
|
$
|
27.22
|
|
$
|
33.33
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
22.30
|
|
$
|
28.73
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|||||
|
2nd Quarter
|
28.91
|
|
33.83
|
|
0.07
|
|
23.14
|
|
29.65
|
|
0.07
|
|
|||||||||||
|
3rd Quarter
|
27.90
|
|
33.73
|
|
0.07
|
|
25.30
|
|
32.31
|
|
0.07
|
|
|||||||||||
|
4th Quarter
|
23.22
|
|
31.75
|
|
0.07
|
|
26.39
|
|
33.67
|
|
0.07
|
|
|||||||||||
Restrictions on the Payment of Dividends
The First Amendment to our Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) and the indenture governing our 6.25% senior notes due in 2023 (the “2023 Senior Notes”) limit the amount of dividends that can be declared and paid. However, we do not believe this limitation materially restricts the Board of Directors’ ability to declare or our ability to pay regular quarterly dividends to our common stockholders.
In addition to this limitation, the declaration and payment of dividends and the amount of dividends will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table represents issuer purchases of equity securities.
17
|
Total Number of
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Number
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
of Shares that May
|
|
|||||||
|
of Shares
|
|
Average Price
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
Yet Be Purchased
|
|
|||||
|
Fiscal Period
|
Purchased
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
Announced Program
|
|
Under the Program
(1)
|
|
||||
|
November 1, 2015 - November 28, 2015
|
823
|
|
(2)
|
$
|
30.50
|
|
—
|
|
2,348,500
|
|
||
|
November 29, 2015 - January 2, 2016
|
25,985
|
|
(2)
|
$
|
27.44
|
|
—
|
|
2,348,500
|
|
||
|
January 3, 2016 - January 30, 2016
|
6,557
|
|
(2)
|
$
|
26.43
|
|
—
|
|
2,348,500
|
|
||
|
Total
|
33,365
|
|
(2)
|
$
|
27.32
|
|
—
|
|
2,348,500
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
On August 25, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to 2.5 million shares of our outstanding common stock. We can use the repurchase program to repurchase shares on the open market or in private transactions from time to time, depending on market conditions. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Under this plan, 151,500 shares were repurchased during the first quarter of
2015
. Therefore, there were 2.3 million shares authorized to be repurchased under the program as of
January 30, 2016
. Repurchases of common stock are limited under our debt agreements, as further discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(2)
|
Reflects shares that were tendered by employees related to certain share-based awards. These shares were tendered in satisfaction of the exercise price of stock options and/or to satisfy minimum tax withholding amounts for non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and stock performance awards. Accordingly, these share purchases are not considered a part of our publicly announced stock repurchase program.
|
18
Stock Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the cumulative total return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the following indices: (i) the S&P
©
SmallCap 600 Stock Index and (ii) a peer group of companies believed to be engaged in similar businesses. Our peer group consists of DSW, Inc., Genesco, Inc., Shoe Carnival, Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc., Steven Madden, Ltd. and Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to each January 31. Accordingly, share prices are as of the last business day in each fiscal year. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and each index was
$100
at January 29,
2011
. The graph also assumes that all dividends were reinvested and that investments were held through
January 30, 2016
. These indices are included for comparative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect management’s opinion that such indices are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of the common stock.
*$100 invested on January 29, 2011 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Index calculated on month-end basis.
|
1/29/2011
|
|
1/28/2012
|
|
2/2/2013
|
|
2/1/2014
|
|
1/31/2015
|
|
1/30/2016
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
$
|
78.63
|
|
$
|
142.15
|
|
$
|
198.75
|
|
$
|
240.64
|
|
$
|
229.92
|
|
|||||
|
Peer Group
|
100.00
|
|
132.67
|
|
162.79
|
|
193.35
|
|
219.86
|
|
202.01
|
|
|||||||||||
|
S&P
©
SmallCap 600 Stock Index
|
100.00
|
|
108.87
|
|
126.32
|
|
160.47
|
|
170.34
|
|
162.36
|
|
|||||||||||
|
ITEM 6
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the other information contained elsewhere in this report. Our accounting period is based upon a traditional retail calendar, which ends on the Saturday nearest January 31. Periodically, this results in a fiscal year that includes 53 weeks which can affect annual comparisons. Our
2015
,
2014
,
2013
and 2011 fiscal years each included 52 weeks, while our 2012 fiscal year included 53 weeks.
19
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands, except per share amounts)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(53 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
2,577,430
|
|
$
|
2,571,709
|
|
$
|
2,513,113
|
|
$
|
2,477,796
|
|
$
|
2,434,766
|
|
|||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
1,529,627
|
|
1,531,609
|
|
1,498,825
|
|
1,489,221
|
|
1,470,270
|
|
||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
1,047,803
|
|
1,040,100
|
|
1,014,288
|
|
988,575
|
|
964,496
|
|
||||||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
912,696
|
|
910,682
|
|
909,749
|
|
891,666
|
|
910,293
|
|
||||||||||
|
Restructuring and other special charges, net
|
—
|
|
3,484
|
|
1,262
|
|
22,431
|
|
23,671
|
|
||||||||||
|
Impairment of assets held for sale
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,660
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Operating earnings
|
135,107
|
|
125,934
|
|
98,617
|
|
74,478
|
|
30,532
|
|
||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(16,589
|
)
|
(20,445
|
)
|
(21,254
|
)
|
(22,973
|
)
|
(25,428
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(10,651
|
)
|
(420
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,003
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Interest income
|
899
|
|
379
|
|
377
|
|
322
|
|
569
|
|
||||||||||
|
Gain on sale of subsidiary
|
—
|
|
4,679
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Earnings before income taxes from continuing operations
|
108,766
|
|
110,127
|
|
77,740
|
|
51,827
|
|
4,670
|
|
||||||||||
|
Income tax (provision) benefit
|
(26,942
|
)
|
(27,184
|
)
|
(23,758
|
)
|
(16,656
|
)
|
1,421
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
81,824
|
|
82,943
|
|
53,982
|
|
35,171
|
|
6,091
|
|
||||||||||
|
Discontinued operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4,574
|
)
|
(4,437
|
)
|
4,334
|
|
||||||||||
|
Disposition/impairment of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(11,512
|
)
|
(3,530
|
)
|
13,965
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16,086
|
)
|
(7,967
|
)
|
18,299
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
81,824
|
|
82,943
|
|
37,896
|
|
27,204
|
|
24,390
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
345
|
|
93
|
|
(177
|
)
|
(287
|
)
|
(199
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
81,479
|
|
$
|
82,850
|
|
$
|
38,073
|
|
$
|
27,491
|
|
$
|
24,589
|
|
|||||
|
Operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Return on net sales
|
3.2
|
%
|
3.2
|
%
|
1.5
|
%
|
1.1
|
%
|
1.0
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Return on beginning Caleres, Inc. shareholders' equity
|
15.1
|
%
|
17.4
|
%
|
9.0
|
%
|
6.7
|
%
|
5.9
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Return on average invested capital
(1)
|
12.6
|
%
|
11.6
|
%
|
9.1
|
%
|
6.5
|
%
|
2.6
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
$
|
12,253
|
|
$
|
12,237
|
|
$
|
12,105
|
|
$
|
12,011
|
|
$
|
12,076
|
|
|||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
$
|
73,479
|
|
$
|
44,952
|
|
$
|
43,968
|
|
$
|
55,801
|
|
$
|
27,857
|
|
|||||
|
Capitalized software
|
$
|
7,735
|
|
$
|
5,086
|
|
$
|
5,235
|
|
$
|
7,928
|
|
$
|
10,707
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
(2)
|
$
|
52,606
|
|
$
|
54,015
|
|
$
|
57,842
|
|
$
|
57,344
|
|
$
|
61,449
|
|
|||||
|
Per Common Share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
From continuing operations
|
$
|
1.86
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|||||
|
From discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
(0.19
|
)
|
0.42
|
|
||||||||||
|
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
|
1.86
|
|
1.90
|
|
0.88
|
|
0.64
|
|
0.57
|
|
||||||||||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
From continuing operations
|
1.85
|
|
1.89
|
|
1.25
|
|
0.83
|
|
0.14
|
|
||||||||||
|
From discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
(0.19
|
)
|
0.42
|
|
||||||||||
|
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
|
1.85
|
|
1.89
|
|
0.88
|
|
0.64
|
|
0.56
|
|
||||||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
0.28
|
|
0.28
|
|
0.28
|
|
0.28
|
|
0.28
|
|
||||||||||
|
Ending Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity
|
13.78
|
|
12.36
|
|
10.99
|
|
9.91
|
|
9.83
|
|
||||||||||
20
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands, except per share amounts)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(53 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Financial Position:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Receivables, net
|
$
|
153,664
|
|
$
|
136,646
|
|
$
|
129,217
|
|
$
|
111,392
|
|
$
|
130,485
|
|
|||||
|
Inventories, net
|
546,745
|
|
543,103
|
|
547,531
|
|
503,688
|
|
518,893
|
|
||||||||||
|
Working capital
|
484,766
|
|
420,609
|
|
420,735
|
|
306,781
|
|
231,514
|
|
||||||||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
179,010
|
|
149,743
|
|
143,560
|
|
144,856
|
|
130,244
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
1,303,323
|
|
1,214,327
|
|
1,146,340
|
|
1,170,332
|
|
1,227,476
|
|
||||||||||
|
Borrowings under our revolving credit agreement
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,000
|
|
105,000
|
|
201,000
|
|
||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
196,544
|
|
196,712
|
|
195,947
|
|
195,182
|
|
198,633
|
|
||||||||||
|
Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity
|
601,484
|
|
540,910
|
|
476,699
|
|
425,129
|
|
412,669
|
|
||||||||||
|
Average common shares outstanding – basic
|
42,455
|
|
42,071
|
|
41,356
|
|
40,659
|
|
41,126
|
|
||||||||||
|
Average common shares outstanding – diluted
|
42,656
|
|
42,274
|
|
41,653
|
|
40,794
|
|
41,668
|
|
||||||||||
All data presented reflects the fiscal year ended on the Saturday nearest to January 31. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These reclassifications did not affect net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. Refer to Item 7,
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
, for additional information related to the selected financial data above.
|
(1)
|
Return on average invested capital is calculated by dividing operating earnings for the period, adjusted for income taxes at the applicable effective rate, by the average of each month-end invested capital balance during the year. Invested capital is defined as Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity plus long-term debt and borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
|
|
(2)
|
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of capitalized software, intangibles and debt issuance costs and debt discount. The amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount is reflected within interest expense in our consolidated statement of earnings and totaled $1.2 million in 2015, $2.4 million in 2014, $2.5 million in 2013, $2.6 million in 2012 and $2.3 million in 2011.
|
|
ITEM 7
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
OVERVIEW
|
Business Overview
We are a global footwear company, with annual net sales of
$2.6 billion
whose shoes are worn by people of all ages, from all walks of life.
Our mission is to continue to inspire people to feel better feet first. We offer the consumer a powerful portfolio of footwear stores and global footwear brands. As both a retailer and a wholesaler, we have a perspective on the marketplace that enables us to serve consumers from different vantage points. We believe our diversified business model provides us with synergies by spanning consumer segments, categories and distribution channels. A combination of talent acquisition, thoughtful planning and rigorous execution is key to our success in optimizing our business and portfolio of brands. Our business strategy is focused on continuing to evolve our portfolio of brands, driving profit growth to achieve our financial targets, investing in avenues of growth while refocusing our resources, and remaining consumer centric.
Famous Footwear
Our Famous Footwear segment includes our Famous Footwear stores as well as Famous.com. As further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Shoes.com, which was previously included in our Famous Footwear segment, was sold in December of 2014. Famous Footwear is one of America’s leading family
–
branded footwear retailers with
1,046
stores at the end of
2015
and net sales of
$1.6 billion
in
2015
. Our focus for the Famous Footwear segment is on meeting the needs of a well-defined consumer by providing an assortment of trend-right, brand-name fashion and athletic footwear at a great price, coupled with exclusive products and engaging marketing programs.
Brand Portfolio
Our Brand Portfolio segment is consumer-focused and we believe our success is dependent upon our ability to strengthen consumers’ preference for our brands by offering compelling style, quality, differentiated brand promises and innovative marketing campaigns. The segment is comprised of the Naturalizer, Sam Edelman, Dr. Scholl's, Franco Sarto, LifeStride, Vince, Via Spiga, Ryka, Fergie, Carlos, Bzees, Diane von Furstenberg and George Brown brands. Through these brands, and brand families, we offer our customers a diversified selection of footwear, each designed and targeted to a specific consumer segment within the marketplace. We are able to showcase many of our brands in our retail stores and online, leveraging our wholesale and retail platforms, sharing consumer insights across our businesses and testing new and innovative products. Our Brand Portfolio segment operates
165
retail stores in the United States, Canada and Guam, primarily for our Naturalizer brand. This segment also includes our e-commerce businesses that sell our branded footwear.
21
Financial Highlights
We continued to execute our strategic initiatives and deliver consistent, profitable and sustainable growth in
2015
, with operating earnings of
$135.1 million
. The operating earnings increase of
7.3%
was driven by our Famous Footwear segment, which also reported a higher gross profit rate of
44.9%
, compared to 44.4% in 2014. Our Brand Portfolio segment reported an increase in net sales of 2.3%, reflecting strong performance from many of our brands.
The following is a summary of the financial highlights for
2015
:
|
•
|
Consolidated net sales increased
$5.7 million
, or
0.2%
, to
$2,577.4 million
in
2015
, compared to
$2,571.7 million
last year. The growth was primarily driven by our Brand Portfolio segment, which reported a net sales increase of
$22.3 million
, partially offset by a decrease in our Famous Footwear segment, driven by the disposition of Shoes.com in 2014. Excluding Shoes.com, which contributed $45.7 million of net sales in 2014, our net sales were $51.4 million, or 2.0% higher than in 2014.
|
|
•
|
Consolidated operating earnings were
$135.1 million
in
2015
, compared to
$125.9 million
last year.
|
|
•
|
Consolidated net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. were
$81.5 million
, or
$1.85
per diluted share, in
2015
, compared to $82.8 million, or
$1.89
per diluted share, last year.
|
The following items should be considered in evaluating the comparability of our
2015
and
2014
results:
|
•
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt – During
2015
, we incurred a loss of
$10.7 million
($6.5 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.15 per diluted share) related to the redemption of our senior notes due in 2019 prior to maturity, as further discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. During
2014
, we incurred a loss of
$0.4 million
reflecting the early extinguishment of our revolving credit agreement prior to maturity.
|
|
•
|
Sale of Shoes.com and related restructuring – During 2014, we sold our e-commerce subsidiary, Shoes.com, for a pre-tax gain of $4.7 million. In addition, we incurred related severance and other restructuring charges of $1.5 million in 2014. We also recognized tax benefits of $6.6 million associated with the disposition of Shoes.com. These tax benefits were driven in part by the utilization of operating and capital loss carryforwards that previously were not anticipated to be utilized, and therefore, fully reserved on our consolidated balance sheets. In total, the disposition of Shoes.com, inclusive of the related severance and other restructuring charges, improved net earnings by $9.8 million (or $0.23 per diluted share) in 2014. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
|
Our debt-to-capital ratio, as defined in the
Liquidity and Capital Resources – Working Capital and Cash Flow
section, improved to 24.6% as of
January 30, 2016
, compared to 26.6% at
January 31, 2015
, reflecting higher shareholders' equity due to the impact of our 2015 net earnings. Our current ratio, as defined in the
Liquidity and Capital Resources – Working Capital and Cash Flow
section, improved to 2.24 to 1 at
January 30, 2016
, from 2.14 to 1 at
January 31, 2015
.
Outlook for 2016
The challenging retail environment did not derail us from steady improvement towards our long-term financial goals. We are planning additional growth in 2016, as we expand our presence in markets with greater concentrations of highly valuable consumers. We expect same-store sales at Famous Footwear will grow in the low single-digit percentage range in 2016 and our Brand Portfolio net sales are expected to increase in the mid-single-digit percentage range.
Following are the consolidated results and the results by segment for
2015
,
2014
and
2013
:
22
|
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||||||||||
|
% of
|
|
% of
|
|
% of
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
($ millions)
|
Net Sales
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
2,577.4
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
2,571.7
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
2,513.1
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
1,529.6
|
|
59.3
|
%
|
1,531.6
|
|
59.6
|
%
|
1,498.8
|
|
59.6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
1,047.8
|
|
40.7
|
%
|
1,040.1
|
|
40.4
|
%
|
1,014.3
|
|
40.4
|
%
|
||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
912.7
|
|
35.4
|
%
|
910.7
|
|
35.4
|
%
|
909.7
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Restructuring and other special charges, net
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3.5
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
1.3
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Impairment of assets held for sale
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4.7
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Operating earnings
|
135.1
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
125.9
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
98.6
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(16.5
|
)
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
(20.5
|
)
|
(0.8)
|
%
|
(21.3
|
)
|
(0.8)
|
%
|
||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(10.7
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
(0.4
|
)
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Interest income
|
0.9
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
0.4
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
0.4
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
||||||
|
Gain on sale of subsidiary
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4.7
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Earnings before income taxes from continuing operations
|
108.8
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
110.1
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
77.7
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Income tax provision
|
(27.0
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
(27.2
|
)
|
(1.1)
|
%
|
(23.7
|
)
|
(0.9)
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
81.8
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
82.9
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
54.0
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Discontinued operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
(0.2)
|
%
|
||||||
|
Disposition/impairment of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
(0.5)
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
(0.7)
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net earnings
|
81.8
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
82.9
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
37.9
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
0.3
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
0.1
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
81.5
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
$
|
82.8
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
$
|
38.1
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|||
Net Sales
Net sales increased
$5.7 million
, or
0.2%
, to
$2,577.4 million
in
2015
, compared to
$2,571.7 million
last year, primarily driven by our Brand Portfolio segment, which reported a
$22.3 million
, or
2.3%
, increase in net sales. The increase in net sales reflects strong performance from many of our brands. Our Brand Portfolio retail net sales were impacted by a lower Canadian dollar exchange rate, a lower store count and a
0.7%
decrease in same-store sales. Our Famous Footwear segment reported a
$16.6 million
decrease in net sales, primarily driven by the disposition of Shoes.com in December of 2014, partially offset by a
1.9%
increase in same-store sales at our retail stores. Excluding Shoes.com, which contributed $45.7 million of net sales in 2014, our Famous Footwear segment net sales were $29.1 million, or 1.9% higher than last year. Excluding Shoes.com, our consolidated net sales were $51.4 million, or 2.0% higher than last year.
Net sales increased
$58.6 million
, or
2.3%
, to
$2,571.7 million
in
2014
, compared to
$2,513.1 million
in
2013
, primarily driven by our Brand Portfolio segment, which reported a
$57.9 million
, or
6.3%
, increase in net sales. The increase reflects strong performance from many of our brands, despite a
3.6%
decrease in same-store sales at our branded retail stores. Our Brand Portfolio net sales were also impacted by a lower store count and a lower Canadian dollar exchange rate. Our Famous Footwear segment reported a
$0.7 million
increase in net sales, reflecting a
1.5%
increase in same-store sales at our Famous Footwear retail stores, partially offset by the disposition of Shoes.com and a lower store count.
Same-store sales changes are calculated by comparing the sales in stores that have been open at least 13 months. Relocated stores are treated as new stores, and closed stores are excluded from the calculation. Sales change from new and closed stores, net, reflects the change in net sales due to stores that have been opened or closed during the period and are thereby excluded from the same-store sales calculation. E-commerce sales for those websites that function as an extension of a retail chain are included in the same-store sales calculation.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased
$7.7 million
, or
0.7%
, to
$1,047.8 million
in
2015
, compared to
$1,040.1 million
last year. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate increased to
40.7%
in 2015, compared to
40.4%
in
2014
, driven by our Famous Footwear segment, which reported a gross profit rate of
44.9%
for
2015
, compared to
44.4%
in
2014
driven in part by the disposition of Shoes.com. Our Shoes.com business achieved lower margins than the rest of the Famous Footwear segment due to the higher expenses for freight and customer returns inherent
23
in the e-commerce business. This impact was partially offset by a higher consolidated mix of wholesale versus retail sales. Gross profit rates on retail sales are higher than wholesale sales. In aggregate, retail and wholesale net sales were 66% and 34%, respectively, in
2015
compared to 67% and 33% in
2014
.
Gross profit increased
$25.8 million
, or
2.5%
, to
$1,040.1 million
in
2014
, compared to
$1,014.3 million
in
2013
. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate remained consistent at
40.4%
. The gross profit rate reflects improvement in both our Brand Portfolio and Famous Footwear segments, partially offset by a higher consolidated mix of wholesale versus retail sales and a lower volume of branded sales through our branded retail stores. In aggregate, retail and wholesale net sales were 67% and 33%, respectively, in
2014
compared to 70% and 30% in
2013
.
We classify warehousing, distribution, sourcing and other inventory procurement costs in selling and administrative expenses. Accordingly, our gross profit and selling and administrative expenses rates, as a percentage of net sales, may not be comparable to other companies.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses increased
$2.0 million
, or
0.2%
, to
$912.7 million
in
2015
, compared to
$910.7 million
last year, driven by a $14.2 million increase in our Brand Portfolio segment expenses due to the expansion of several of our brands and a new warehouse service provider in China. This was partially offset by an $11.6 million decrease in unallocated corporate administrative and other costs due to lower pension expense, lower variable compensation expense for directors and certain employees and a gain on the sale of a vacant building at our Corporate headquarters. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses were
35.4%
in
2015
, consistent with
2014
.
Selling and administrative expenses increased
$1.0 million
, or
0.1%
, to
$910.7 million
in
2014
, compared to
$909.7 million
in
2013
. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to
35.4%
in
2014
from
36.2%
in
2013
, reflecting better leveraging of our expense base over higher net sales.
Restructuring and Other Special Charges, Net
There were no restructuring and other special charges in
2015
. Restructuring and other special charges, net increased
$2.2 million
to
$3.5 million
during
2014
, compared to
$1.3 million
in
2013
as a result of costs of $1.9 million related to organizational changes in 2014 and charges of $1.5 million related to the disposition of Shoes.com, as further discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements. In addition, there were portfolio realignment costs incurred in 2013, with no corresponding costs in 2014. As a percentage of net sales, restructuring and other special charges, were
0.1%
in
2014
, consistent with
2013
.
Impairment of Assets Held for Sale
There were no charges for impairment of assets held for sale in
2015
or
2014
. In
2013
, we sold certain of our supply chain and sourcing assets as part of our portfolio realignment efforts. In anticipation of the sale, we recognized an impairment charge of
$4.7 million
in
2013
to adjust the assets to their estimated fair value. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Operating Earnings
Operating earnings increased
$9.2 million
, or
7.3%
, to
$135.1 million
in
2015
, compared to
$125.9 million
last year, primarily driven by a higher gross profit rate. In addition, operating earnings benefited from the impact of no restructuring and other special charges in
2015
, partially offset by higher selling and administrative expenses, as discussed above.
Operating earnings increased
$27.3 million
, or
27.7%
, to
$125.9 million
in
2014
, compared to
$98.6 million
in
2013
, driven by higher sales and resulting gross profit. In addition, operating earnings in
2014
benefited from the impact of no impairment of assets held for sale in
2014
, partially offset by higher restructuring and other special charges and higher selling and administrative expenses, as discussed above.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $4.0 million, or
18.9%
, to $16.5 million in
2015
compared to
$20.5 million
last year, and decreased
$0.8 million
, or
3.8%
, in
2014
compared to
$21.3 million
in
2013
. The decrease in
2015
reflects lower average borrowings under our revolving credit agreement and lower interest on our senior notes, as a result of the redemption of our senior notes due in 2019 and the issuance of senior notes due in 2023 reducing our interest rate from 7.125% to 6.25%, as further discussed in
Liquidity and Capital Resources
. The decrease in interest expense in
2014
was primarily due to lower average borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. In 2015, we capitalized interest of
$0.3 million
associated with the expansion and modernization of our Lebanon, Tennessee distribution center, with no corresponding amounts capitalized in 2014 or 2013.
24
During
2015
, we incurred a loss of
$10.7 million
related to the redemption of our 2019 senior notes prior to maturity, as further discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. During
2014
, we incurred a loss of
$0.4 million
reflecting the early extinguishment of the former revolving credit agreement prior to maturity. We did not incur such costs in
2013
.
Gain on Sale of Subsidiary
In 2014, we sold our e-commerce subsidiary, Shoes.com. We recognized a pre-tax gain upon on the sale of the subsidiary of
$4.7 million
, representing the difference in the net proceeds less costs to sell, as compared to the carrying value of the net assets. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Income Tax Provision
Our consolidated effective tax rate on continuing operations was a provision of 24.8% in
2015
compared to 24.7% in
2014
and 30.6% in
2013
. In
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, we recognized pre-tax earnings in both our domestic operations and foreign jurisdictions. Our consolidated effective tax rate is generally below the federal statutory rate of 35% because our foreign earnings are subject to lower statutory tax rates.
In 2014, our effective tax rate was impacted by several factors. In connection with the disposition of Shoes.com, we recognized a pre-tax gain, net of related restructuring costs, of $3.1 million, while recognizing an associated tax benefit of $6.6 million. This tax benefit was driven in part by the utilization of operating and capital loss carryforwards that were previously not anticipated to be utilized and were therefore fully reserved on our consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we recognized a tax expense of $1.0 million related to a dividend received from an international subsidiary. If the impacts of the Shoes.com disposition and the tax on the dividend had been excluded, our full fiscal year 2014 effective tax rate would have been 30.6%, consistent with 2013.
In
2015
, our effective tax rate was impacted by several discrete tax benefits which totaled $5.1 million for the year. These discrete tax benefits primarily reflected the utilization of operating loss, capital loss and other carryforwards that were previously not anticipated to be utilized and were therefore fully reserved on the consolidated balance sheet. A portion of these carryforwards became utilizable upon conversion of our primary retail entity to an LLC early in 2015. In addition, certain additional tax carryforwards were able to be utilized upon settlement of the tax attributes associated with the sale of our Shoes.com subsidiary. If these discrete tax benefits had not been recognized, our full fiscal year 2015 effective tax rate would have been 29.5%, which is 1.1% lower than 2014, driven by a lower state tax rate and a higher mix of earnings in international jurisdictions.
Refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our tax rates.
Net Earnings from Continuing Operations
We reported net earnings from continuing operations of
$81.8 million
in
2015
, compared to
$82.9 million
in
2014
and
$54.0 million
in
2013
, as a result of the factors described above.
Net Loss from Discontinued Operations
Our discontinued operations in 2013 included the operations and sale of our Avia and Nevados brands acquired during the 2011 acquisition of American Sporting Goods Corporation, as well as the operations and impairment of our Vera Wang brand. During
2013
, we sold the Avia and Nevados brands and reported a net loss from discontinued operations of
$16.1 million
. In conjunction with the sale, we recorded a net charge related to the impairment and disposition of those brands of
$11.5 million
, representing the difference in the fair value, less costs to sell, as compared to the carrying value of the net assets sold. During
2013
, we also decided not to renew the Vera Wang license agreement and reflected the operations of this brand as discontinued operations. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding discontinued operations.
Net Earnings Attributable to Caleres, Inc.
We reported net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. of
$81.5 million
in
2015
, compared to
$82.8 million
last year and
$38.1 million
in
2013
.
Geographic Results
We have both domestic and foreign operations. Domestic operations include the nationwide operation of our Famous Footwear and other branded retail footwear stores, the wholesale distribution of footwear to numerous retail customers and the operation of our e-commerce websites. Foreign operations primarily consist of wholesale operations in the Far East and Canada, retailing operations in Canada and the operation of our international e-commerce websites. In addition, we license certain of our trademarks to third parties who distribute and/or operate retail locations internationally. The Far East operations include first-cost transactions, where footwear is sold at foreign ports to
25
customers who then import the footwear into the United States and other countries. The breakdown of domestic and foreign net sales and earnings before income taxes was as follows:
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Earnings Before
|
Earnings Before
|
Earnings Before
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ millions)
|
Net Sales
|
|
Income Taxes
|
Net Sales
|
|
Income Taxes
|
Net Sales
|
|
Income Taxes
|
||||||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
2,342.6
|
|
$
|
68.2
|
|
$
|
2,318.5
|
|
$
|
70.8
|
|
$
|
2,258.6
|
|
$
|
40.9
|
|
|||||
|
Foreign
|
234.8
|
|
40.6
|
|
253.2
|
|
39.3
|
|
254.5
|
|
36.8
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
$
|
2,577.4
|
|
$
|
108.8
|
|
$
|
2,571.7
|
|
$
|
110.1
|
|
$
|
2,513.1
|
|
$
|
77.7
|
|
|||||
The pre-tax profitability on foreign sales is higher than on domestic sales because of a lower cost structure and the inclusion in domestic earnings of the unallocated corporate administrative and other costs.
|
FAMOUS FOOTWEAR
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||||||||||
|
% of
|
|
% of
|
|
% of
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
($ millions)
|
Net Sales
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
1,572.7
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
1,589.3
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
1,588.6
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
866.0
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
883.2
|
|
55.6
|
%
|
887.4
|
|
55.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
706.7
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
706.1
|
|
44.4
|
%
|
701.2
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
597.7
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
600.7
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
595.8
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Restructuring and other special charges, net
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0.8
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Operating earnings
|
$
|
109.0
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
$
|
104.6
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
$
|
105.4
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|||
|
Key Metrics
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Same-store sales % change (on a 52-week basis)
|
1.9
|
%
|
1.5
|
%
|
2.9
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Same-store sales $ change (on a 52-week basis)
|
$
|
27.9
|
|
$
|
22.4
|
|
$
|
41.1
|
|
|||||||||
|
Sales change from 53rd week
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Sales change from new and closed stores, net (on a 52-week basis)
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
$
|
(6.1
|
)
|
$
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Impact of changes in Canadian exchange rate on sales
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Sales change of Shoes.com (sold in December 2014)
|
$
|
(45.7
|
)
|
$
|
(15.3
|
)
|
$
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce (on a 52-week basis)
|
$
|
217
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|||||||||
|
Square footage (thousands sq. ft.)
|
6,949
|
|
6,958
|
|
7,059
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stores opened
|
50
|
|
50
|
|
51
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stores closed
|
42
|
|
56
|
|
62
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Ending stores
|
1,046
|
|
1,038
|
|
1,044
|
|
||||||||||||
Net Sales
Net sales decreased
$16.6 million
to
$1,572.7 million
in
2015
compared to
$1,589.3 million
last year. During
2015
, the decrease was primarily due to the disposition of Shoes.com, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, which contributed
$45.7 million
of net sales in 2014, partially offset by a
1.9%
, or
$27.9 million
, increase in same-store sales. The same-store sales increase was driven by continued strength in key selling categories, including athletic shoes and booties, which drove our average retail prices higher. We also saw growth in our e-commerce sales as more customers shifted from visiting our stores to the more convenient online shopping
26
experience. During 2015, we expanded our in-store fulfillment initiative to approximately 900 stores, which has reduced the average number of business days for shoes ordered online or in our Famous Footwear stores to be delivered to our customers. As a result of the same-store sales increase, sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce, increased 1.2% to
$217
, compared to
$215
last year. Net sales were also impacted by a higher store count and a lower Canadian dollar exchange rate. Members of Rewards, our customer loyalty program, continue to account for a majority of the segment's sales, with approximately 74% of our net sales to Rewards members in
2015
, compared to 73% in
2014
and 70% in
2013
.
Net sales increased
$0.7 million
to
$1,589.3 million
in
2014
compared to
$1,588.6 million
in
2013
. During
2014
, same-store sales increased
1.5%
, or
$22.4 million
, reflecting an improved conversion rate and higher average retail prices, partially offset by a decrease in customer traffic. In addition, we saw strong growth from canvas and athletic shoes and boots. As a result of the same-store sales increases, sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce, increased 3.5% to
$215
, compared to
$207
in
2013
. Net sales of Shoes.com decreased $15.3 million, or 25.2%, to $45.7 million in
2014
compared to $61.0 million in
2013
. The decrease was due, in part, to the disposal of this subsidiary in December 2014. Net sales were also impacted by a lower store count and a lower Canadian dollar exchange rate.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased
$0.6 million
, or
0.1%
, to
$706.7 million
in
2015
compared to
$706.1 million
last year due to a higher gross profit rate, partially offset by lower sales. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate increased to
44.9%
in
2015
compared to
44.4%
last year. The increase in our gross profit rate reflects the disposition of Shoes.com late in 2014, and a continued shift in mix toward higher margin products. Our Shoes.com business achieved lower margins than the rest of the Famous Footwear segment due to the higher expenses for freight and customer returns inherent in the e-commerce business.
Gross profit increased
$4.9 million
, or
0.7%
, to
$706.1 million
in
2014
compared to
$701.2 million
in
2013
due to higher net sales and gross profit rate. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate increased to
44.4%
in
2014
compared to
44.1%
in
2013
. The increase in our gross profit rate was driven by the above named factors.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses decreased
$3.0 million
, or
0.5%
, to
$597.7 million
during
2015
compared to
$600.7 million
last year. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower expenses due to the disposition of Shoes.com in late 2014, partially offset by higher store rent and facilities costs and an increase in expected payouts under our cash and stock-based incentive plans. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to
38.0%
in
2015
from
37.7%
last year.
Selling and administrative expenses increased
$4.9 million
, or
0.8%
, to
$600.7 million
during
2014
compared to
$595.8 million
in
2013
.
The increase was primarily attributable to higher store rent, depreciation expense and other facilities costs and higher variable store employee and benefit costs, partially offset by lower marketing expenses and a decrease in expected payouts under our cash and stock-based incentive plans. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to
37.7%
in
2014
from
37.5%
in
2013
.
Restructuring and Other Special Charges, Net
We incurred restructuring and other special charges of
$0.8 million
in
2014
related to the disposition of Shoes.com, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, with no corresponding costs in
2015
or
2013
.
Operating Earnings
Operating earnings increased
$4.4 million
, or
4.3%
to
$109.0 million
for
2015
, compared to
$104.6 million
last year. As a percentage of net sales, our operating earnings increased to
6.9%
for 2015, compared to
6.6%
for 2014.
Operating earnings decreased
$0.8 million
, or
0.8%
, to
$104.6 million
for
2014
, compared to
$105.4 million
in
2013
. As a percentage of net sales, our operating earnings of
6.6%
were consistent with
2013
.
27
|
BRAND PORTFOLIO
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||||||||||
|
% of
|
|
% of
|
|
% of
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
($ millions)
|
Net Sales
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
1,004.8
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
982.5
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
924.6
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
663.7
|
|
66.1
|
%
|
648.5
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
611.5
|
|
66.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
341.1
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
334.0
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
313.1
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
274.5
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
260.3
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
267.3
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
||||||
|
Restructuring and other special charges, net
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
0.3
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
1.2
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Impairment of assets held for sale
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4.7
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Operating earnings
|
$
|
66.6
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
$
|
73.4
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
$
|
39.9
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Key Metrics
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Wholesale/retail sales mix (%)
|
87%/13%
|
|
86%/14%
|
|
83%/17%
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in wholesale net sales ($)
|
$
|
32.5
|
|
$
|
77.8
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
|||||||||
|
Unfilled order position at year-end
|
$
|
274.4
|
|
$
|
284.6
|
|
$
|
273.9
|
|
|||||||||
|
Same-store sales % change (on a 52-week basis)
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
1.6
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Same-store sales $ change (on a 52-week basis)
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
$
|
(4.8
|
)
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|||||||||
|
Sales change from 53rd week
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Sales change from new and closed stores, net (on a 52-week basis)
|
$
|
(1.8
|
)
|
$
|
(11.3
|
)
|
$
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Impact of changes in Canadian exchange rate on retail sales
|
$
|
(7.6
|
)
|
$
|
(3.8
|
)
|
$
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce (on a 52-week basis)
|
$
|
343
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|||||||||
|
Square footage (thousands sq. ft.)
|
294
|
|
302
|
|
319
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stores opened
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
11
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stores closed
|
13
|
|
15
|
|
54
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Ending stores
|
165
|
|
171
|
|
179
|
|
||||||||||||
Net Sales
Net sales increased
$22.3 million
, or
2.3%
, to
$1,004.8 million
in
2015
compared to
$982.5 million
last year. The increase reflects strong performance from many of our brands, including Sam Edelman, LifeStride, Vince and Carlos, partially offset by decreases in our Naturalizer and Via Spiga brands. Net sales at our branded retail stores were impacted by a lower Canadian dollar exchange rate, a lower store count and a decline in same-store sales of
0.7%
. We opened
seven
stores and closed
13
stores during
2015
, resulting in a total of
165
stores at the end of
2015
, compared to
171
stores at the end of last year. Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce, decreased 8.9% to
$343
compared to
$377
last year. Our unfilled order position for our wholesale sales decreased
$10.2 million
, or
3.6%
, to
$274.4 million
at the end of
2015
, as compared to
$284.6 million
at the end of last year primarily due to declines in our Naturalizer, LifeStride and Dr. Scholl's brands, partially offset by an increase in our Franco Sarto brand. Though not significant to net sales for 2015, we recently launched our Diane von Furstenberg brand during the fourth quarter. We also are excited to launch our George Brown line of men's footwear in 2016.
Net sales increased
$57.9 million
, or
6.3%
, to
$982.5 million
in
2014
compared to
$924.6 million
in
2013
. The increase reflects strong performance from many of our brands, including Sam Edelman, Vince, Via Spiga and Franco Sarto, partially offset by a decrease in our Naturalizer brand. Our branded retail stores experienced a decline in same-store sales of
3.6%
. In addition, our retail sales were impacted by lower store count and a lower Canadian dollar exchange rate. We opened
seven
stores and closed
15
stores during
2014
, resulting in a total of
171
stores at the end of
2014
compared to
179
stores at the end of
2013
. Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce, decreased
28
5.1% to
$377
compared to
$397
in
2013
. Our unfilled order position for our wholesale sales increased
$10.7 million
, or
3.9%
, to
$284.6 million
at the end of
2014
, as compared to
$273.9 million
at the end of
2013
.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased
$7.1 million
, or
2.1%
, to
$341.1 million
in
2015
compared to
$334.0 million
last year driven by higher net sales, partially offset by a lower gross profit rate. Our gross profit rate decreased slightly to
33.9%
in
2015
as compared to
34.0%
last year primarily resulting from higher inventory markdowns to clear inventory at our branded retail stores and a lower mix of retail versus wholesale sales. Our retail operations have a higher gross profit rate than our wholesale business.
Gross profit increased
$20.9 million
, or
6.7%
, to
$334.0 million
in
2014
compared to
$313.1 million
in
2013
reflecting higher sales and a higher gross profit rate. Our gross profit rate increased slightly to
34.0%
in
2014
compared to
33.9%
in
2013
primarily resulting from higher wholesale margins for many of our brands, including the impact of lower royalty expense from the acquisition of the Franco Sarto trademarks in the first quarter of 2014, and an improved sales mix of higher margin footwear, partially offset by higher inventory markdowns to clear inventory at our branded retail stores.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses increased
$14.2 million
, or
5.5%
, to
$274.5 million
during
2015
compared to
$260.3 million
last year, primarily driven by additional costs associated with our new or expanded brands, including Sam Edelman, Vince Men's and Diane von Furstenberg, and higher expenses for a new warehouse service provider in China to distribute product to our international customers, partially offset by a decrease in anticipated payments under our cash-based incentive plans. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to
27.3%
in
2015
from
26.5%
last year, reflecting the above named factors.
Selling and administrative expenses decreased
$7.0 million
, or
2.6%
, to
$260.3 million
during
2014
compared to
$267.3 million
in
2013
, primarily due to lower warehouse expenses, our lower branded retail store count and a lower Canadian dollar exchange rate, partially offset by an increase in anticipated payments under our cash and stock-based incentive plans and higher marketing expenses. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to
26.5%
in
2014
from
29.0%
in
2013
, reflecting the above named factors.
Restructuring and Other Special Charges, Net
There were no restructuring and other special charges during
2015
. Restructuring and other special charges decreased $0.9 million, or
77.3%
, to
$0.3 million
in
2014
, compared to
$1.2 million
in
2013
as a result of our portfolio realignment initiatives, which were substantially complete in early
2013
. Refer to Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
Impairment of Assets Held for Sale
There were no charges for impairment of assets held for sale during
2015
or
2014
. During 2013, we sold certain of our supply chain and sourcing assets. In conjunction with the sale, we recognized an impairment charge of
$4.7 million
, representing the difference between the fair value of the assets, less costs to sell, and the carrying value of the assets.
Operating Earnings
Operating earnings decreased
$6.8 million
, or
9.3%
, to
$66.6 million
in
2015
compared to
$73.4 million
last year. The decrease was primarily driven by higher selling and administrative expenses and a lower gross profit rate, partially offset by higher net sales. As a percentage of net sales, operating earnings decreased to
6.6%
in
2015
compared to
7.5%
last year.
Operating earnings increased
$33.5 million
, or
83.9%
, to
$73.4 million
in
2014
, compared to
$39.9 million
in
2013
. The increase was primarily driven by higher net sales and lower selling and administrative expenses. As a percentage of net sales, operating earnings increased to
7.5%
in
2014
compared to
4.3%
in
2013
.
|
OTHER
|
The Other category includes unallocated corporate administrative and other costs and recoveries. Costs of $40.5 million, $52.1 million, and $46.7 million were incurred in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively.
The $11.6 million decrease in costs in
2015
compared to
2014
was primarily a result of the following factors:
|
•
|
Lower pension expense driven by plan provision changes which lowered our projected benefit obligation;
|
29
|
•
|
Lower expenses related to our variable compensation plans for our directors and certain employees with awards that utilize mark-to-market accounting based on the Company's closing stock price; and
|
|
•
|
A gain on sale of a vacant building at our corporate headquarters.
|
The $5.4 million increase in costs in
2014
compared to
2013
was primarily a result of higher anticipated payments under our cash and stock-based incentive plans and higher consulting fees.
|
RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER INITIATIVES
|
During 2014, we incurred costs associated with the disposal of Shoes.com of $1.5 million and costs of $1.9 million related to management changes at our corporate headquarters, with no corresponding costs in 2015 or 2013. During 2013, we recorded portfolio realignment initiative costs of $30.7 million, with no corresponding costs in 2015 or 2014. See the
Financial Highlights
section above and Note 2 and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
|
IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
|
While we have felt the effects of inflation on our business and results of operations, it has not had a significant impact on our business over the last three years. Inflation can have a long-term impact on our business because increasing costs of materials and labor may impact our ability to maintain satisfactory profit rates. For example, our products are manufactured in other countries, and a decline in the value of the U.S. dollar and the impact of labor shortages in China or other countries may result in higher manufacturing costs. Similarly, any potential significant shortage of quantities or increases in the cost of the materials that are used in our manufacturing process, such as leather and other materials or resources, could have a material negative impact on our business and results of operations. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which could have a negative impact on consumer spending, in which case our net sales and profit rates could decrease. Moreover, increases in inflation may not be matched by increases in wages, which also could have a negative impact on consumer spending. If we incur increased costs that are unable to be recovered through price increases, or if consumer spending decreases generally, our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows may be adversely affected. In an effort to mitigate the impact of these incremental costs on our operating results, we expect to pass on some portion of cost increases to our consumers and adjust our business model, as appropriate, to minimize the impact of higher costs. Further discussion of the potential impact of inflation and changing prices is included in Item 1A,
Risk Factors
.
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
|
Borrowings
|
($ millions)
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|||||
|
Long-term debt - 2023 Senior Notes
|
$
|
196.5
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
196.5
|
|
||
|
Long-term debt - 2019 Senior Notes
|
—
|
|
196.7
|
|
(196.7
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total debt
|
$
|
196.5
|
|
$
|
196.7
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
||
Total debt obligations decreased
$0.2 million
, or
0.1%
, to
$196.5 million
at the end of
2015
compared to
$196.7 million
at the end of last year. Interest expense in
2015
was $16.5 million compared to
$20.5 million
in
2014
and
$21.3 million
in
2013
. The decrease in interest expense in
2015
reflects lower average borrowings under our revolving credit agreement and lower interest on our senior notes as a result of the redemption of our senior notes due in 2019 ("2019 Senior Notes") and the issuance of senior notes due in 2023 ("2023 Senior Notes") reducing our interest rate from 7.125% to 6.25%, as further described below. In addition, we capitalized
$0.3 million
of interest costs associated with the expansion and modernization of our Lebanon, Tennessee distribution center.
Credit Agreement
On December 18, 2014, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Loan Parties”) entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was further amended on July 20, 2015 to release all of the Company’s subsidiaries that were borrowers under or that guaranteed the credit agreement other than Sidney Rich Associates, Inc. and BG Retail, LLC (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”). After giving effect to the amendment, the Company is the lead borrower, and Sidney Rich Associates, Inc. and BG Retail, LLC are each co-borrowers and guarantors under the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement matures on December 18, 2019 and provides for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to
$600.0 million
, subject to the calculated borrowing base restrictions, and provides for an increase at the Company’s option by up to
$150.0 million
from time to time during the term of the Credit Agreement, subject to satisfaction
30
of certain conditions and the consent of existing or new lenders to assume the increase. Under the Credit Agreement, the Loan Parties' obligations are secured by a first priority security interest in all accounts receivable, inventory and certain other collateral.
Interest on borrowings is at variable rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or the prime rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a spread. The interest rate and fees for letters of credit vary based upon the level of excess availability under the Credit Agreement. There is an unused line fee payable on the unused portion under the facility and a letter of credit fee payable on the outstanding face amount under letters of credit.
We were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions under the Credit Agreement as of
January 30, 2016
. Refer to further discussion regarding the Credit Agreement in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
At
January 30, 2016
, we had
no
borrowings and $6.5 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement. Total borrowing availability was $525.1 million at
January 30, 2016
.
$200 Million Senior Notes
On July 20, 2015, we commenced a cash tender offer for our 2019 Senior Notes. The tender offer expired on July 24, 2015 and $160.7 million aggregate principal amount of the 2019 Senior Notes were validly tendered. The remaining $39.3 million aggregate principal amount of 2019 Senior Notes was redeemed on August 26, 2015.
On July 27, 2015, we issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 2023 Senior Notes in a private placement. On October 22, 2015, we commenced an offer to exchange our 2023 Senior Notes outstanding for substantially identical debt securities registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The exchange offer was completed on November 23, 2015 and did not affect the amount of our indebtedness outstanding. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $196.3 million after deducting fees and expenses associated with the offering. We used the net proceeds, together with cash on hand, to redeem the outstanding 2019 Senior Notes.
The 2023 Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the subsidiaries of Caleres, Inc. that is an obligor under the Credit Agreement. The 2023 Senior Notes bear interest at 6.25%, which is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year beginning on February 15, 2016. The 2023 Senior Notes mature on August 15, 2023. Prior to August 15, 2018, we may redeem some or all of the 2023 Senior Notes at various redemption prices.
The 2023 Senior Notes also contain certain covenants and restrictions that limit certain activities including, among other things, levels of indebtedness, payments of dividends, the guarantee or pledge of assets, certain investments, common stock repurchases, mergers and acquisitions and sales of assets. As of January 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions relating to the 2023 Senior Notes.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
During 2015 and 2014, we incurred losses on early extinguishment of debt of
$10.7 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively, with no corresponding loss in 2013. The loss in 2015 represents the tender offer and call premiums, unamortized debt issuance costs, and original issue discount related to the 2019 Senior Notes. Of the
$10.7 million
loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2015, approximately $3.0 million was non-cash. The loss in 2014 represents the early extinguishment of the revolving credit agreement prior to maturity.
Working Capital and Cash Flow
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
||||
|
Working capital ($ millions)
(1)
|
$484.8
|
$420.6
|
$64.2
|
||||||
|
Debt-to-capital ratio
(2)
|
24.6
|
%
|
26.6
|
%
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|||
|
Current ratio
(3)
|
2.24:1
|
|
2.14:1
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Working capital has been computed as total current assets less total current liabilities.
|
|
(2)
|
Debt-to-capital has been computed by dividing total debt by total capitalization. Total debt is defined as long-term debt and borrowings under the Credit Agreement. Total capitalization is defined as total debt and total equity.
|
|
(3)
|
The current ratio has been computed by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities.
|
31
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
149.2
|
|
$
|
118.8
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
||
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
(73.8
|
)
|
(112.0
|
)
|
38.2
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
(23.5
|
)
|
(20.5
|
)
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(1.2
|
)
|
(1.4
|
)
|
0.2
|
|
|||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
50.7
|
|
$
|
(15.1
|
)
|
$
|
65.8
|
|
||
Working capital at
January 30, 2016
, was
$484.8 million
, which was
$64.2 million
higher than at
January 31, 2015
. The increase in working capital reflects our strong 2015 financial performance, including net cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by cash used for both investing and financing activities. Working capital also reflects higher cash and cash equivalents, higher receivables, and an increase in the current income tax asset, partially offset by an increase in trade accounts payable. Our debt-to-capital ratio improved to
24.6%
as of
January 30, 2016
, compared to 26.6% at
January 31, 2015
, primarily reflecting higher shareholders' equity due to the impact of our 2015 net earnings. Our current ratio improved to 2.24 to 1 at
January 30, 2016
, from 2.14 to 1 at
January 31, 2015
.
At
January 30, 2016
, we had
$118.2 million
of cash and cash equivalents. The majority of this balance represents the accumulated unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, which are considered indefinitely reinvested. Refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for more information regarding our unremitted foreign earnings.
Reasons for the major variances in cash provided (used) in the table above are as follows:
Cash provided by operating activities was
$30.4 million
higher in
2015
than last year, reflecting the following factors:
|
•
|
An increase in trade accounts payable in 2015 as compared to a decrease in 2014 due to the timing of inventory purchases and payments to vendors;
|
|
•
|
Higher net earnings (after consideration of non-cash items); and
|
|
•
|
A smaller increase in prepaid expenses and other current and noncurrent assets in 2015 as compared to 2014, reflecting a smaller increase in prepaid rent in 2015 than 2014 as a result of the timing of payments; partially offset by
|
|
•
|
A decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities in 2015 as compared to an increase in 2014 driven by higher payments under our cash-based incentive plans in 2015.
|
Cash used for investing activities was
$38.2 million
lower in
2015
than last year, primarily due to the $65.1 million acquisition of the Franco Sarto trademarks in 2014 and the $7.4 million in proceeds from disposal of property and equipment related to the sale of a vacant building at our Corporate headquarters in 2015. These variances were partially offset by higher purchases of property and equipment in 2015, driven by the expansion and modernization of our distribution centers and leasehold improvements associated with the relocation of one of our leased office spaces in New York City. In
2016
, we expect purchases of property and equipment and capitalized software of approximately $70 million, with an estimated $16 million allocated for continued expansion and modernization of our distribution centers.
Cash used for financing activities was
$3.0 million
higher in
2015
than last year, primarily due to an increase in common stock issued under share-based plans in 2015 and the acquisition of treasury stock in 2015, partially offset by a decrease in net repayments under the revolving credit agreement.
We paid dividends of $0.28 per share in each of
2015
,
2014
and
2013
. The
2015
dividends marked the 93
rd
year of consecutive quarterly dividends. On March 3, 2016, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share, payable April 1, 2016, to shareholders of record on March 21, 2016, marking the 373
rd
consecutive quarterly dividend to be paid by the Company. The declaration and payment of any future dividend is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, business conditions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. However, we presently expect that dividends will continue to be paid.
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
|
Certain accounting issues require management estimates and judgments for the preparation of financial statements. Our most significant policies requiring the use of estimates and judgments are listed below.
32
Revenue Recognition
Retail sales, recognized at the point of sale, are recorded net of returns and exclude sales tax. Wholesale sales are recorded, net of returns, allowances and discounts, generally when the merchandise has been shipped and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. Revenue for products sold that are shipped directly to an individual consumer is recognized upon delivery to the consumer. Reserves for projected merchandise returns, discounts and allowances are determined based on historical experience and current expectations. Revenue is recognized on license fees related to Company-owned brand-names, where the Company is the licensor, when the related sales of the licensee are made.
Inventories
Inventories are our most significant asset, representing approximately 42% of total assets at the end of
2015
. We value inventories at the lower of cost or market with 95% of consolidated inventories using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs and are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
We apply judgment in valuing our inventories by assessing the net realizable value of our inventories based on current selling prices. At our Famous Footwear segment, we recognize markdowns when it becomes evident that inventory items will be sold at retail prices less than cost, plus the cost to sell the product. This policy causes the gross profit rate at our Famous Footwear segment to be lower than the initial markup during periods when permanent price reductions are taken to clear product. At our Brand Portfolio segment, we generally provide markdown reserves to reduce the carrying values of inventories to a level where, upon sale of the product, we will realize our normal gross profit rate. We believe these policies reflect the difference in operating models between our Famous Footwear segment and our Brand Portfolio segment. Famous Footwear periodically runs promotional events to drive sales to clear seasonal inventories. The Brand Portfolio segment generally relies on permanent price reductions to clear slower-moving inventory.
We perform physical inventory counts or cycle counts on all merchandise inventory on hand throughout the year and adjust the recorded balance to reflect the results. We record estimated shrinkage between physical inventory counts based on historical results. Inventory shrinkage is included as a component of cost of goods sold.
Income Taxes
We record deferred taxes for the effects of timing differences between financial and tax reporting. These differences relate principally to employee benefit plans, accrued expenses, bad debt reserves, depreciation and amortization and inventory.
We evaluate our foreign investment opportunities and plans, as well as our foreign working capital needs, to determine the level of investment required and, accordingly, determine the level of foreign earnings that we consider indefinitely reinvested. Based upon that evaluation, earnings of our foreign subsidiaries that are not otherwise subject to United States taxation, except for our Canadian subsidiary, are considered to be indefinitely reinvested, and accordingly, deferred taxes have not been provided. If changes occur in future investment opportunities and plans, those changes will be reflected when known and may result in providing residual United States deferred taxes on unremitted foreign earnings.
At
January 30, 2016
, we have net operating loss and other carryforwards at certain of our subsidiaries. We evaluate these carryforwards for realization based upon their expiration dates and our expectations of future taxable income. As deemed appropriate, valuation reserves are recorded to adjust the recorded value of these carryforwards to the expected realizable value.
We are audited periodically by domestic and foreign tax authorities and tax assessments may arise several years after tax returns have been filed. Tax liabilities are recorded when, in management’s judgment, a tax position does not meet the more-likely-than-not threshold for recognition. For tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold, a tax liability may be recorded depending on management’s assessment of how the tax position will ultimately be settled. In evaluating issues raised in such audits and other uncertain tax positions, we provide reserves for exposures as appropriate.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. We adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”),
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment
, which permits, but does not require, a company to qualitatively assess indicators of a reporting unit’s fair value when it is unlikely that a reporting unit is impaired. If, after completing the qualitative assessment, a company believes it is likely that a reporting unit is impaired, a discounted cash flow analysis is prepared to estimate fair value. If the recorded values of these assets are not recoverable, based on either the assessment screen or discounted cash flow analysis, management performs the next step, which compares the fair value of the reporting unit to the recorded value of the tangible and intangible assets of the reporting units. Goodwill is considered impaired if the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. An adjustment to goodwill is recorded for
33
any goodwill determined to be impaired. Impairment of goodwill is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of goodwill over the fair values of recognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. For 2015, we elected to perform the optional qualitative assessment for the goodwill impairment test.
We perform impairment tests during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events indicate an interim test is required. The goodwill impairment testing and other indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment reviews were performed as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter and resulted in no impairment charges. Other intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives and are reviewed for impairment if and when impairment indicators are present. Refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets.
Store Closing and Impairment Charges
We regularly analyze the results of all of our stores and assess the viability of underperforming stores to determine whether events or circumstances exist that indicate the stores should be closed or whether the carrying amount of their long-lived assets may not be recoverable. After allowing for an appropriate start-up period, unusual nonrecurring events or favorable trends, we write down to fair value the fixed assets of stores indicated as impaired.
Litigation Contingencies
We are the defendant in several claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe any of these ordinary- course-of-business proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We accrue our best estimate of the cost of resolution of these claims. Legal defense costs of such claims are recognized in the period in which we incur the costs. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for a further description of commitments and contingencies.
Environmental Matters
We are involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites. We are remediating, under the oversight of Colorado authorities, the groundwater and indoor air at our Redfield site and residential neighborhoods adjacent to and near the property, which have been affected by solvents previously used at the facility. In addition, various federal and state authorities have identified us as a potentially responsible party for remediation at certain landfills. While we currently do not operate manufacturing facilities in the United States, prior operations included numerous manufacturing and other facilities for which we may have responsibility under various environmental laws to address conditions that may be identified in the future. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for a further description of specific properties.
Environmental expenditures relating to an existing condition caused by past operations and that do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated and are evaluated independently of any future claims recovery. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with completion of a feasibility study or our commitment to a formal plan of action, and our estimates of cost are subject to change as new information becomes available. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are discounted to their present value in those situations requiring only continuing maintenance and monitoring based upon a schedule of fixed payments.
Retirement and Other Benefit Plans
We sponsor pension plans in both the United States and Canada. Our domestic pension plans cover substantially all United States employees, and our Canadian pension plans cover certain employees based on plan specifications. In addition, we maintain an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) and sponsor unfunded defined benefit postretirement life insurance plans that cover both salaried and hourly employees who had become eligible for benefits by January 1, 1995.
We determine our expense and obligations for retirement and other benefit plans based on assumptions related to discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on invested plan assets, expected salary increases and certain employee-related factors, such as turnover, retirement age and mortality, among others. Our assumptions reflect our historical experience and our best judgment regarding future expectations. Additional information related to our assumptions is as follows:
|
•
|
Expected long-term rate of return – The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the plan’s investment portfolio. Assumed projected rates of return for each asset class were selected after analyzing experience and future expectations of the returns. The overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed based on the target allocation for each asset class. The weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets used to determine our pension expense for 2015 was 8.25%. A decrease of 50 basis points in the weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets would increase pension expense by approximately $1.9 million. The actual return on plan assets in a
|
34
given year may differ from the expected long-term rate of return, and the resulting gain or loss is deferred and recognized into the plans’ expense over time.
|
•
|
Discount rate – Discount rates used to measure the present value of our benefit obligations for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans are based on a hypothetical bond portfolio constructed from a subset of high-quality bonds for which the timing and amount of cash outflows approximate the estimated payouts of the plans. The weighted-average discount rate selected to measure the present value of our benefit obligations under our pension and other postretirement benefit plans was 4.7% for each. A decrease of 50 basis points in the weighted-average discount rate would have increased the projected benefit obligation of the pension and other postretirement benefit plans by approximately $27.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
|
|
•
|
Mortality table – As of January 30, 2016, we are using the RP-2014 Bottom Quartile tables, projected using generational scale MP-2015, an updated projection scale issued by the Society of Actuaries in 2015, to estimate the actuarial gain or loss. Actuarial gains, related to the change in mortality tables, reduced the projected benefit obligation by approximately
$7.9 million
as of January 30, 2016.
|
Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to our retirement and other benefit plans.
Impact of Prospective Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements and their impact on the Company are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
|
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
|
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements as of
January 30, 2016
.
|
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
|
The table below sets forth our significant future obligations by time period. Further information on certain of these commitments is provided in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, which are cross-referenced in this table. Our obligations outstanding as of
January 30, 2016
include the following:
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Less Than
|
|
1-3
|
|
3-5
|
|
More Than
|
|
||||||||
|
($ millions)
|
Total
|
|
1 Year
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|||||
|
Long-term debt
(1)
|
$
|
200.0
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
200.0
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
(1)
|
100.0
|
|
12.5
|
|
25.0
|
|
25.0
|
|
37.5
|
|
|||||
|
Operating lease commitments
(2)
|
757.6
|
|
159.7
|
|
238.1
|
|
154.0
|
|
205.8
|
|
|||||
|
Minimum license commitments
|
24.9
|
|
10.0
|
|
12.5
|
|
2.4
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Purchase obligations
(3)
|
645.0
|
|
630.9
|
|
13.9
|
|
0.2
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other
(4)
|
12.9
|
|
3.6
|
|
3.2
|
|
3.4
|
|
2.7
|
|
|||||
|
Total
(5)
|
$
|
1,740.4
|
|
$
|
816.7
|
|
$
|
292.7
|
|
$
|
185.0
|
|
$
|
446.0
|
|
|
(1)
|
Interest obligations have been reflected based on our $200.0 million principal value of 2023 Senior Notes at a fixed interest rate of 6.25% as of fiscal year ended January 30, 2016. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(2)
|
A majority of our retail operating leases contain provisions that allow us to modify amounts payable under the lease or terminate the lease in certain circumstances, such as experiencing actual sales volume below a defined threshold and/or co-tenancy provisions associated with the facility. The contractual obligations presented in the table above reflect the total lease obligation, irrespective of our ability to reduce or terminate rental payments in the future, as noted. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(3)
|
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase assets, goods or services that specify all significant terms, including quantity and price provisions.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes obligations for our supplemental executive retirement plan and other postretirement benefits, as discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, and other contractual obligations.
|
|
(5)
|
Excludes liabilities of $3.4 million, $1.7 million and $8.9 million for our non-qualified deferred compensation plan, deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors and restricted stock units for non-employee directors, respectively, due to the uncertain nature in timing of payments. Refer to Note 5, Note 13 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 AND FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
|
35
This
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projected as they are subject to various risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the risks detailed in Item 1A,
Risk Factors,
and those described in other documents and reports filed from time to time with the SEC, press releases and other communications. We do not undertake any obligation or plan to update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change.
|
ITEM 7A
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
|
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES
|
The market risk inherent in our financial instruments and positions represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To address these risks, we enter into various hedging transactions. All decisions on hedging transactions are authorized and executed pursuant to our policies and procedures, which do not allow the use of financial instruments for trading purposes. We also are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these financial instruments. Counterparties to these agreements, however, are major international financial institutions, and we believe the risk of loss due to nonperformance is minimal.
A description of our accounting policies for derivative financial instruments is included in Notes 1 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
In addition, we are exposed to translation risk because certain of our foreign operations utilize the local currency as their functional currency and those financial results must be translated into United States dollars. As currency exchange rates fluctuate, translation of our financial statements of foreign businesses into United States dollars affects the comparability of financial results between years.
|
INTEREST RATES
|
Our financing arrangements include outstanding variable rate debt under the Credit Agreement and $200.0 million in principal value of 2023 Senior Notes, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.25%. We had no borrowings under the Credit Agreement at
January 30, 2016
. Changes in interest rates impact fixed and variable rate debt differently. For fixed rate debt, a change in interest rates will only impact the fair value of the debt, whereas a change in the interest rates on variable rate debt will impact interest expense and cash flows.
At
January 30, 2016
, the fair value of our long-term debt is estimated at approximately $196.0 million based upon the pricing of our 2023 Senior Notes at that time. Market risk is viewed as the potential change in fair value of our debt resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in interest rates and would be $7.5 million for our long-term debt at
January 30, 2016
.
Information appearing under the caption
Risk Management and Derivatives
in Note 12 and
Fair Value Measurements
in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements is incorporated herein by reference.
|
ITEM 8
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Based on our evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
January 30, 2016
. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2016 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included herein.
36
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Caleres, Inc.
We have audited Caleres, Inc.’s (the Company’s) internal control over financial reporting as of
January 30, 2016
, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Caleres, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
January 30, 2016
, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Caleres, Inc. as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended
January 30, 2016
, and our report dated March 29, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
March 29, 2016
37
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Caleres, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Caleres, Inc. (the Company) as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Caleres, Inc. at
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
January 30, 2016
, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Caleres, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
January 30, 2016
, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework), and our report dated March 29, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
March 29, 2016
38
|
|
||||||||
|
($ thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
|
||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
118,151
|
|
$
|
67,403
|
|
||
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $24,780 in 2015 and $25,393 in 2014
|
153,664
|
|
136,646
|
|
||||
|
Inventories, net of adjustment to last-in, first-out cost of $4,094 in 2015 and $3,668 in 2014
|
546,745
|
|
543,103
|
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
11,146
|
|
620
|
|
||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
45,359
|
|
42,376
|
|
||||
|
Total current assets
|
875,065
|
|
790,148
|
|
||||
|
Prepaid pension costs
|
64,890
|
|
73,324
|
|
||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
179,010
|
|
149,743
|
|
||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
1,847
|
|
7,704
|
|
||||
|
Goodwill
|
13,954
|
|
13,954
|
|
||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
116,945
|
|
120,633
|
|
||||
|
Other assets
|
51,612
|
|
58,821
|
|
||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,303,323
|
|
$
|
1,214,327
|
|
||
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Trade accounts payable
|
$
|
237,802
|
|
$
|
215,921
|
|
||
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
54,993
|
|
58,593
|
|
||||
|
Income taxes
|
3,519
|
|
6,285
|
|
||||
|
Other accrued expenses
|
93,985
|
|
88,740
|
|
||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
390,299
|
|
369,539
|
|
||||
|
Other liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
196,544
|
|
196,712
|
|
||||
|
Deferred rent
|
46,506
|
|
39,742
|
|
||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
32,268
|
|
27,544
|
|
||||
|
Other liabilities
|
35,234
|
|
39,168
|
|
||||
|
Total other liabilities
|
310,552
|
|
303,166
|
|
||||
|
Equity:
|
||||||||
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 43,660,213 and 43,752,031 shares outstanding, net of 2,426,582 and 2,334,764 treasury shares in 2015 and 2014, respectively
|
437
|
|
437
|
|
||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
138,881
|
|
138,957
|
|
||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(5,864
|
)
|
2,712
|
|
||||
|
Retained earnings
|
468,030
|
|
398,804
|
|
||||
|
Total Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity
|
601,484
|
|
540,910
|
|
||||
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
988
|
|
712
|
|
||||
|
Total equity
|
602,472
|
|
541,622
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
$
|
1,303,323
|
|
$
|
1,214,327
|
|
||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
39
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
|
||||||||||||
|
($ thousands, except per share amounts)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
2,577,430
|
|
$
|
2,571,709
|
|
$
|
2,513,113
|
|
|||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
1,529,627
|
|
1,531,609
|
|
1,498,825
|
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
1,047,803
|
|
1,040,100
|
|
1,014,288
|
|
||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
912,696
|
|
910,682
|
|
909,749
|
|
||||||
|
Restructuring and other special charges, net
|
—
|
|
3,484
|
|
1,262
|
|
||||||
|
Impairment of assets held for sale
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,660
|
|
||||||
|
Operating earnings
|
135,107
|
|
125,934
|
|
98,617
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(16,589
|
)
|
(20,445
|
)
|
(21,254
|
)
|
||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(10,651
|
)
|
(420
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Interest income
|
899
|
|
379
|
|
377
|
|
||||||
|
Gain on sale of subsidiary
|
—
|
|
4,679
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Earnings before income taxes from continuing operations
|
108,766
|
|
110,127
|
|
77,740
|
|
||||||
|
Income tax provision
|
(26,942
|
)
|
(27,184
|
)
|
(23,758
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
81,824
|
|
82,943
|
|
53,982
|
|
||||||
|
Discontinued operations:
|
||||||||||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $5,922 in 2013
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4,574
|
)
|
||||||
|
Disposition/impairment of discontinued operations, net of tax of $0 in 2013
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(11,512
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16,086
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net earnings
|
81,824
|
|
82,943
|
|
37,896
|
|
||||||
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
345
|
|
93
|
|
(177
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
81,479
|
|
82,850
|
|
38,073
|
|
|||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
|
||||||||||||
|
From continuing operations
|
$
|
1.86
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|||
|
From discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
||||||
|
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
|
$
|
1.86
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
||||||||||||
|
From continuing operations
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|||
|
From discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
||||||
|
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
|
|
||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
81,824
|
|
$
|
82,943
|
|
$
|
37,896
|
|
|||
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income ("OCI"), net of tax:
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
(224
|
)
|
(3,145
|
)
|
(4,538
|
)
|
||||||
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments
|
(8,589
|
)
|
(10,349
|
)
|
19,529
|
|
||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
168
|
|
(514
|
)
|
819
|
|
||||||
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
(8,645
|
)
|
(14,008
|
)
|
15,810
|
|
||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
73,179
|
|
68,935
|
|
53,706
|
|
||||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
276
|
|
49
|
|
(109
|
)
|
||||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
72,903
|
|
$
|
68,886
|
|
$
|
53,815
|
|
|||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
|
|
||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Operating Activities
|
||||||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
81,824
|
|
$
|
82,943
|
|
$
|
37,896
|
|
|||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
35,428
|
|
35,002
|
|
36,033
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of capitalized software
|
12,323
|
|
12,662
|
|
13,047
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
3,688
|
|
3,951
|
|
6,249
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount
|
1,167
|
|
2,400
|
|
2,513
|
|
||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
10,651
|
|
420
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
7,491
|
|
6,190
|
|
5,567
|
|
||||||
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based plans
|
(2,651
|
)
|
(929
|
)
|
(3,439
|
)
|
||||||
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
(1,963
|
)
|
1,610
|
|
1,697
|
|
||||||
|
Impairment charges for property and equipment
|
2,761
|
|
1,982
|
|
1,636
|
|
||||||
|
Impairment of assets held for sale
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,660
|
|
||||||
|
Disposition/impairment of discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
11,512
|
|
||||||
|
Net (gain) loss on sale of subsidiaries
|
—
|
|
(4,679
|
)
|
576
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred rent
|
6,764
|
|
1,149
|
|
4,882
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred income taxes provision (benefit)
|
10,581
|
|
(3,416
|
)
|
18,061
|
|
||||||
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
480
|
|
1,716
|
|
551
|
|
||||||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Receivables
|
(17,438
|
)
|
(9,175
|
)
|
(17,570
|
)
|
||||||
|
Inventories
|
(5,270
|
)
|
(7,651
|
)
|
(44,852
|
)
|
||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current and noncurrent assets
|
(8,654
|
)
|
(20,053
|
)
|
3,798
|
|
||||||
|
Trade accounts payable
|
21,881
|
|
(8,204
|
)
|
12,951
|
|
||||||
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
(1,865
|
)
|
20,142
|
|
4,389
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes
|
|
(10,308
|
)
|
|
2,411
|
|
2,335
|
|
||||
|
Other, net
|
2,262
|
|
341
|
|
1,540
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
149,152
|
|
118,812
|
|
104,032
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(73,479
|
)
|
(44,952
|
)
|
(43,968
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
|
|
7,433
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Capitalized software
|
|
(7,735
|
)
|
|
(5,086
|
)
|
(5,235
|
)
|
||||
|
Acquisition of trademarks
|
|
—
|
|
|
(65,065
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliate
|
—
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net proceeds from sale of subsidiaries, inclusive of note receivable
|
—
|
|
10,120
|
|
69,347
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities
|
(73,781
|
)
|
(111,983
|
)
|
20,144
|
|
||||||
|
Financing Activities
|
||||||||||||
|
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement
|
198,000
|
|
867,000
|
|
1,129,000
|
|
||||||
|
Repayments under revolving credit agreement
|
(198,000
|
)
|
(874,000
|
)
|
(1,227,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of 2023 senior notes
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Redemption of 2019 senior notes
|
|
(200,000
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Dividends paid
|
(12,253
|
)
|
(12,237
|
)
|
(12,105
|
)
|
||||||
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|
(2,618
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
(4,921
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Issuance of common stock under share-based plans, net
|
(5,297
|
)
|
443
|
|
804
|
|
||||||
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based plans
|
2,651
|
|
929
|
|
3,439
|
|
||||||
|
Contributions by noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
50
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
(23,470
|
)
|
(20,483
|
)
|
(105,812
|
)
|
||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,153
|
)
|
(1,489
|
)
|
(4,041
|
)
|
||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
50,748
|
|
(15,143
|
)
|
14,323
|
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
67,403
|
|
82,546
|
|
68,223
|
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
118,151
|
|
$
|
67,403
|
|
$
|
82,546
|
|
|||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
Total Caleres, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
Non-controlling Interests
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Common Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
|
Shares
|
Dollars
|
Total Equity
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
BALANCE FEBRUARY 2, 2013
|
42,896,363
|
|
$
|
429
|
|
$
|
121,593
|
|
$
|
884
|
|
$
|
302,223
|
|
$
|
425,129
|
|
$
|
772
|
|
$
|
425,901
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
38,073
|
|
38,073
|
|
(177
|
)
|
37,896
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
(4,556
|
)
|
|
(4,556
|
)
|
18
|
|
(4,538
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $289
|
819
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
819
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of tax of $12,319
|
19,529
|
|
|
19,529
|
|
|
19,529
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
53,865
|
|
(159
|
)
|
53,706
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends ($0.28 per share)
|
(12,105
|
)
|
(12,105
|
)
|
|
(12,105
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Contributions by noncontrolling interests
|
50
|
|
50
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock issued under employee and director benefit and restricted stock plans
|
481,916
|
|
5
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
804
|
|
||||||||||
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based plans
|
3,439
|
|
|
|
3,439
|
|
|
3,439
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
$
|
5,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,567
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,567
|
|
||||||||
|
BALANCE FEBRUARY 1, 2014
|
43,378,279
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
$
|
131,398
|
|
$
|
16,676
|
|
$
|
328,191
|
|
$
|
476,699
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
$
|
477,362
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
82,850
|
|
82,850
|
|
93
|
|
82,943
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
(3,101
|
)
|
(3,101
|
)
|
(44
|
)
|
(3,145
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $408
|
(514
|
)
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of tax of $6,494
|
(10,349
|
)
|
|
(10,349
|
)
|
|
|
(10,349
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
68,886
|
|
49
|
|
68,935
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends ($0.28 per share)
|
(12,237
|
)
|
(12,237
|
)
|
|
|
(12,237
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Stock issued under employee and director benefit and restricted stock plans
|
373,752
|
|
3
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
443
|
|
||||||||||
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based plans
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
929
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
6,190
|
|
|
|
6,190
|
|
|
6,190
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
BALANCE JANUARY 31, 2015
|
43,752,031
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
$
|
138,957
|
|
$
|
2,712
|
|
$
|
398,804
|
|
$
|
540,910
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
$
|
541,622
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
81,479
|
|
81,479
|
|
345
|
|
81,824
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
(155
|
)
|
(155
|
)
|
(69
|
)
|
(224
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $170
|
168
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
168
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of tax of $5,537
|
(8,589
|
)
|
|
(8,589
|
)
|
|
(8,589
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
72,903
|
|
276
|
|
73,179
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends ($0.28 per share)
|
(12,253
|
)
|
(12,253
|
)
|
|
(12,253
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
(151,500
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(4,919
|
)
|
(4,921
|
)
|
(4,921
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Stock issued under employee and director benefit and restricted stock plans
|
59,682
|
|
2
|
|
(5,299
|
)
|
|
|
(5,297
|
)
|
|
(5,297
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based plans
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
7,491
|
|
|
|
7,491
|
|
|
7,491
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
BALANCE JANUARY 30, 2016
|
43,660,213
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
$
|
138,881
|
|
$
|
(5,864
|
)
|
$
|
468,030
|
|
$
|
601,484
|
|
$
|
988
|
|
$
|
602,472
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
Caleres, Inc., originally founded as Brown Shoe Company, Inc. in 1878 and incorporated in 1913, is a global footwear retailer and wholesaler. In May 2015, the shareholders of Brown Shoe Company, Inc. approved a rebranding initiative that changed the name of the company to Caleres, Inc. (the "Company"). The Company’s shares are traded under the “CAL” symbol on the New York Stock Exchange.
The Company provides a broad offering of licensed, branded and private-label casual, dress and athletic footwear products to women, men and children. Footwear is sold at a variety of price points through multiple distribution channels both domestically and internationally. The Company currently operates
1,211
retail shoe stores in the United States, Canada and Guam primarily under the Famous Footwear and Naturalizer names. In addition, through its Brand Portfolio segment, the Company designs, sources and markets footwear to retail stores domestically and internationally, including national chains, department stores, online retailers, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs. In
2015
, approximately
66%
of the Company’s net sales were at retail, compared to
67%
in
2014
and
70%
in
2013
. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Company’s business segments.
The Company’s business is seasonal in nature due to consumer spending patterns with higher back-to-school and Christmas season sales. Traditionally, the third fiscal quarter accounts for a substantial portion of the Company’s earnings for the year.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, after the elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests in the Company’s consolidated financial statements result from the accounting for noncontrolling interests in partially-owned consolidated subsidiaries or affiliates. Noncontrolling interests represent partially-owned subsidiaries’ or consolidated affiliates’ losses and components of other comprehensive income that are attributable to the noncontrolling parties’ equity interests. The Company consolidates B&H Footwear Company Limited (“B&H Footwear”), a joint venture, into its consolidated financial statements. Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests represent the share of net earnings or losses that are attributable to the equity that is owned by the Company’s partners. Transactions between the Company and B&H Footwear have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Period
The Company’s fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending the Saturday nearest to January 31. Fiscal years
2015
,
2014
and
2013
ended on
January 30, 2016
,
January 31, 2015
and
February 1, 2014
, respectively, and each fiscal year included 52 weeks.
Basis of Presentation
Certain prior period amounts on the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications did not affect net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
The consolidated statement of cash flows includes the cash flows from operating, financing and investing activities of both continuing operations and discontinued operations. All other financial information is reported on a continuing operations basis, unless otherwise noted. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion regarding discontinued operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
44
Receivables
The Company evaluates the collectibility of selected accounts receivable on a case-by-case basis and makes adjustments to the bad debt reserve for expected losses. The Company considers factors such as ability to pay, bankruptcy, credit ratings and payment history. For all other accounts, the Company estimates reserves for bad debts based on experience and past due status of the accounts. If circumstances related to customers change, estimates of recoverability are further adjusted. The Company recognized a provision for doubtful accounts of
$0.5 million
in
2015
,
$1.7 million
in
2014
and
$0.6 million
in
2013
.
Customer allowances represent reserves against our wholesale customers’ accounts receivable for margin assistance, product returns, customer deductions and co-op advertising allowances. We estimate the reserves needed for margin assistance by reviewing inventory levels on the retail floors, sell-through rates, historical dilution, current gross margin levels and other performance indicators of our major retail customers. Product returns and customer deductions are estimated using historical experience and anticipated future trends. Co-op advertising allowances are estimated based on customer agreements. The Company recognized a provision for customer allowances of
$47.4 million
in
2015
,
$46.9 million
in
2014
and
$45.1 million
in
2013
.
Customer discounts represent reserves against our accounts receivable for discounts that our wholesale customers may take based on meeting certain order, payment or return guidelines. We estimate the reserves needed for customer discounts based upon customer net sales and respective agreement terms. The Company recognized a provision for customer discounts of
$2.6 million
in
2015
,
$3.5 million
in
2014
and
$4.8 million
in
2013
.
Inventories
All inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market with
95%
of consolidated inventories using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs and are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. If the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method had been used, consolidated inventories would have been
$4.1 million
and
$3.7 million
higher at
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, respectively. Substantially all inventory is finished goods. The Company's inventory balance includes
$2.3 million
and
$1.9 million
as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, respectively, of product subject to a consignment arrangement with wholesale customers.
The costs of inventory, inbound freight and duties, markdowns, shrinkage and royalty expense are classified in cost of goods sold. Costs of warehousing and distribution are classified in selling and administrative expenses and are expensed as incurred. Such warehousing and distribution costs totaled
$70.4 million
,
$71.1 million
and
$75.1 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively. Costs of overseas sourcing offices and other inventory procurement costs are reflected in selling and administrative expenses and are expensed as incurred. Such sourcing and procurement costs totaled
$23.9 million
,
$20.8 million
and
$20.2 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively.
The Company applies judgment in valuing inventories by assessing the net realizable value of inventories based on current selling prices. At the Famous Footwear segment, markdowns are recognized when it becomes evident that inventory items will be sold at retail prices less than cost, plus the cost to sell the product. This policy causes the gross profit rate at Famous Footwear to be lower than the initial markup during periods when permanent price reductions are taken to clear product. At our Brand Portfolio segment, markdown reserves generally reduce the carrying values of inventories to a level where, upon sale of the product, the Company will realize its normal gross profit rate. The Company believes these policies reflect the difference in operating models between the Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments. Famous Footwear periodically runs promotional events to drive sales to clear seasonal inventories. The Brand Portfolio segment relies on permanent price reductions to clear slower-moving inventory.
Markdowns are recorded to reflect expected adjustments to sales prices. In determining markdowns, management considers current and recently recorded sales prices, the length of time the product is held in inventory and quantities of various product styles contained in inventory, among other factors. The ultimate amount realized from the sale of certain products could differ from management estimates. The Company performs physical inventory counts or cycle counts on all merchandise inventory on hand throughout the year and adjusts the recorded balance to reflect the results. The Company records estimated shrinkage between physical inventory counts based on historical results.
Computer Software Costs
The Company capitalizes certain costs in other assets, including internal payroll costs incurred in connection with the development or acquisition of software for internal use. Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets include
$33.2 million
and
$37.9 million
of computer software costs as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, respectively, which are net of accumulated amortization of
$101.0 million
and
$90.1 million
as of the end of the respective periods.
45
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the remaining lease terms, where applicable, using the straight-line method.
Interest Expense
Capitalized Interest
Interest costs for major asset additions are capitalized during the construction or development period and amortized over the lives of the related assets. In 2015, the Company capitalized interest of
$0.3 million
related to its expansion and modernization project at its Lebanon, Tennessee distribution center, with no corresponding amounts capitalized in 2014 or 2013.
Interest Expense
Interest expense includes interest for borrowings under both the Company’s short-term and long-term debt, net of amounts capitalized. Interest expense includes fees paid under the short-term revolving credit agreement for the unused portion of its line of credit. Interest expense also includes the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and debt discount as well as the accretion of certain discounted noncurrent liabilities.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. The Company adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”),
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment
, which permits, but does not require, a company to qualitatively assess indicators of a reporting unit’s fair value when it is unlikely that a reporting unit is impaired. If, after completing the qualitative assessment, a company believes it is likely that a reporting unit is impaired, a discounted cash flow analysis is prepared to estimate fair value. A fair value-based test is applied at the reporting unit level, which is generally at or one level below the operating segment level. The test compares the fair value of the Company’s reporting units to the carrying value of those reporting units. This test requires significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. The fair value of goodwill is determined using an estimate of future cash flows of the reporting units and a risk-adjusted discount rate to compute a net present value of future cash flows. Projected net sales, gross profit, selling and administrative expense, capital expenditures and working capital requirements are based on the Company's internal projections. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows of the reporting units directly resulting from the use of its assets in its operations. Assumptions that market participants may use are also considered. Both the estimates of the fair value of the Company's reporting units and the allocation of the estimated fair value of the reporting units are based on the best information available to the Company's management as of the date of the assessment. If the recorded values of these assets are not recoverable, based on either the assessment screen or discounted cash flow analysis, management performs the next step, which compares the fair value of the reporting unit to the recorded value of the tangible and intangible assets of the reporting units. Goodwill is considered impaired if the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit.
The Company elected to perform the optional qualitative assessment for the goodwill impairment test as of the first day of the fourth quarter of
2015
. The Company has two reporting units, Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio. Based on the results of the most recent goodwill impairment qualitative assessment, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the carrying value. As a result, the Company was not required to perform the discounted cash flow analysis. As of
January 30, 2016
, the goodwill allocated to the Brand Portfolio reporting unit was
$14.0 million
.
The Company performs impairment tests on its indefinite-lived intangible assets as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events indicate an interim test is required. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment reviews performed as of the first day of the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter resulted in no impairment charges. Definite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, are amortized over their useful lives and are reviewed for impairment if and when impairment indicators are present.
Investment in Nonconsolidated Affiliate
The Company has an investment in a nonconsolidated affiliate that is accounted for using the cost method. The investment's carrying value of
$7.0 million
as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company monitors the investment for indicators that a decrease in investment value has occurred that is other than temporary. If the Company determined that a decline in the fair value of the investment below its carrying value is other than temporary, an impairment loss would be recognized. As of
January 30, 2016
, there have been no impairment losses recognized on this investment.
46
Self-Insurance Reserves
The Company is self-insured and/or retains high deductibles for a significant portion of its workers’ compensation, health, disability, cyber risk, general liability, automobile and property programs, among others. Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the Company are estimated by considering historical claims experience, trends of the Company and the industry, and other actuarial assumptions. The estimated accruals for these liabilities could be affected if development of costs on claims differ from these assumptions and historical trends. Based on available information as of
January 30, 2016
, the Company believes it has provided adequate reserves for its self-insurance exposure. As of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, self-insurance reserves were
$9.7 million
and
$9.3 million
, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
Retail sales, recognized at the point of sale, are recorded net of returns and exclude sales tax. Wholesale sales are recorded, net of returns, allowances and discounts, generally when the merchandise has been shipped and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. Revenue for products sold that are shipped directly to an individual consumer is recognized upon delivery to the consumer. Reserves for projected merchandise returns, discounts and allowances are determined based on historical experience and current expectations. Revenue is recognized on license fees related to Company-owned brand-names, where the Company is the licensor, when the related sales of the licensee are made.
Gift Cards
The Company sells gift cards to its consumers in its retail stores, through its Internet sites and at other retailers. The Company’s gift cards do not have expiration dates or inactivity fees. The Company recognizes revenue from gift cards when (i) the gift card is redeemed by the consumer or (ii) the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the consumer is remote (“gift card breakage”) and the Company determines that it does not have a legal obligation to remit the value of unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions. The Company determines its gift card breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns. The Company recognizes gift card breakage during the 24-month period following the sale of the gift card, according to the Company’s historical redemption pattern. Gift card breakage income is included in net sales in the consolidated statements of earnings and the liability established upon the sale of a gift card is included in other accrued expenses within the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognized
$0.7 million
of gift card breakage in
2015
,
$0.4 million
in
2014
, and
$0.5 million
in 2013.
Loyalty Program
The Company maintains a loyalty program (“Rewards”) at Famous Footwear, through which consumers earn points toward savings certificates for qualifying purchases. Upon reaching specified point values, consumers are issued a savings certificate that may be redeemed for purchases at Famous Footwear. Savings certificates earned must be redeemed within stated expiration dates. In addition to the savings certificates, the Company also offers exclusive member discounts. The value of points and rewards earned by Famous Footwear’s Rewards program members are recorded as a reduction of net sales and a liability is established within other accrued expenses at the time the points are earned based on historical conversion and redemption rates. Approximately
74%
of net sales in the Famous Footwear segment were made to its Rewards members in
2015
, compared to
73%
in
2014
and
70%
in
2013
. As of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, the Company had a Rewards program liability of
$7.1 million
and
$7.2 million
, respectively, which is included in other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.
Store Closing and Impairment Charges
The costs of closing stores, including lease termination costs, property and equipment write-offs and severance, as applicable, are recorded when the store is closed or when a binding agreement is reached with the landlord to close the store.
The Company regularly analyzes the results of all of its stores and assesses the viability of underperforming stores to determine whether events or circumstances exist that indicate the stores should be closed or whether the carrying amount of their long-lived assets may not be recoverable. After allowing for an appropriate start-up period, unusual nonrecurring events or favorable trends, property and equipment at stores indicated as impaired are written down to fair value as calculated using a discounted cash flow method. The Company recorded asset impairment charges, primarily related to underperforming retail stores, of
$2.8 million
in
2015
,
$2.0 million
in
2014
and
$1.6 million
in
2013
.
Advertising and Marketing Expense
Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred, except for the costs of direct response advertising that relate primarily to the production and distribution of the Company's catalogs and coupon mailers. Direct response advertising costs are capitalized and amortized over the expected future revenue stream, which is generally one to three months from the date the materials are mailed. External production costs of advertising are expensed when the advertising first appears in the media or in the store.
47
In addition, the Company participates in co-op advertising programs with certain of its wholesale customers. For those co-op advertising programs where the Company has validated the fair value of the advertising received, co-op advertising costs are reflected as advertising expense within selling and administrative expenses. Otherwise, co-op advertising costs are reflected as a reduction of net sales.
Total advertising and marketing expense was
$78.4 million
,
$83.6 million
and
$82.2 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively. These costs were offset by co-op advertising allowances recovered by the Company’s retail business of
$6.5 million
,
$6.2 million
and
$7.8 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively. Total co-op advertising costs reflected as a reduction of net sales were
$9.7 million
in
2015
,
$10.0 million
in
2014
and
$8.3 million
in
2013
. Total advertising costs attributable to future periods that are deferred and recognized as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets were
$2.7 million
and
$2.6 million
at
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of its assets and liabilities. The Company establishes valuation allowances if it believes that it is more-likely-than-not that some or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company does not recognize a tax benefit unless it concludes that it is more-likely-than-not that the benefit will be sustained on audit by the taxing authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. If the recognition threshold is met, the Company recognizes a tax benefit measured at the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in its judgment, is greater than
50%
likely to be realized. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions within the income tax provision on the consolidated statements of earnings.
Operating Leases
The Company leases its store premises and certain office locations, distribution centers and equipment under operating leases. Approximately one-half of the leases entered into by the Company include options that allow the Company to extend the lease term beyond the initial commitment period, subject to terms agreed to at lease inception. Some leases also include early termination options that can be exercised under specific conditions.
Contingent Rentals
Many of the leases covering retail stores require contingent rentals in addition to the minimum monthly rental charge based on retail sales volume. The Company records expense for contingent rentals during the period in which the retail sales volume exceeds the respective targets.
Construction Allowances Received From Landlords
At the time its retail facilities are initially leased, the Company often receives consideration from landlords to be applied against the cost of leasehold improvements necessary to open the store. The Company treats these construction allowances as a lease incentive. The allowances are recorded as a deferred rent obligation and amortized to income over the lease term as a reduction of rent expense. The allowances are reflected as a component of other accrued expenses and deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheets.
Straight-Line Rents and Rent Holidays
The Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term for all of its leased facilities. For leases that have predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals, the Company recognizes the related rental expense on a straight-line basis and records the difference between the recognized rental expense and amounts payable under the lease as deferred rent. At the time its retail facilities are leased, the Company is frequently not charged rent for a specified period of time, typically
30
to
60
days, while the store is being prepared for opening. This rent-free period is referred to as a rent holiday. The Company recognizes rent expense over the lease term, including any rent holiday, within selling and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings.
Pre-opening Costs
Pre-opening costs associated with opening retail stores, including payroll, supplies and facility costs, are expensed as incurred.
Earnings Per Common Share Attributable to Caleres, Inc. Shareholders
The Company uses the two-class method to calculate basic and diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders. Unvested restricted stock awards are considered participating units because they entitle holders to non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents during the vesting term. Under the two-class method, basic earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders is computed by dividing the net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. after allocation of earnings to participating securities by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders is computed by dividing the net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. after allocation of earnings to participating securities by the weighted-average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities outstanding during the year. Potential dilutive securities consist of outstanding stock options and contingently issuable shares for the Company's performance share awards. See Note 3 to the
48
consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the calculation of earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments, pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments and unrealized gains or losses from derivatives used for hedging activities.
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
For certain of the Company’s international subsidiaries, the local currency is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at the period-end exchange rate or historical rates as appropriate. Consolidated statements of earnings amounts are translated at average exchange rates for the period. The cumulative translation adjustments resulting from changes in exchange rates are included in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in total Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Adjustments
The Company determines the expense and obligations for retirement and other benefit plans using assumptions related to discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on invested plan assets, expected salary increases and certain employee-related factors. The unrecognized portion of the gain or loss on plan assets is included in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in total Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity. The gain or loss is recognized into the plans’ expense over time. See additional information related to pension and other postretirement benefits in Note 5 and Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. The Company evaluates its exposure to volatility in foreign currency rates and may enter into derivative transactions. These derivative financial instruments are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. See additional information related to derivative financial instruments in Note 12, Note 13 and Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
Business Combination Accounting
The Company allocates the purchase price of an acquired entity to the assets and liabilities acquired based upon their estimated fair values at the business combination date. The Company also identifies and estimates the fair values of intangible assets that should be recognized as assets apart from goodwill. A single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions. The Company has historically relied in part upon reports from third-party valuation specialists to assist in the estimation of fair values for intangible assets other than goodwill. The carrying values of acquired receivables and trade accounts payable have historically approximated their fair values at the business combination date. With respect to other acquired assets and liabilities, the Company uses all available information to make the best estimates of their fair values at the business combination date.
The Company’s purchase price allocation methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. Management estimates the fair value of assets and liabilities based upon quoted market prices, the carrying value of the acquired assets and widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the accuracy of the Company’s estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company has share-based incentive compensation plans under which certain officers, employees and members of the Board of Directors are participants and may be granted stock options, restricted stock, and stock performance awards. Additionally, share-based grants may be made to non-employee members of the Board of Directors in the form of cash-equivalent restricted stock units (“RSUs”) at no cost to the non-employee member of the Board of Directors. The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718,
Compensation – Stock Compensation
, and ASC 505,
Equity
, which require all share-based payments to employees and members of the Board of Directors, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as expense in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula that requires assumptions for expected volatility, expected dividends, the risk-free interest rate and the expected term of the option. Stock options generally vest over four years, with
25%
vesting annually, and expense is recognized on a straight-line basis separately for each vesting portion of the stock option award. Expense for restricted stock is based on the fair value of the restricted stock on the date of grant and is recognized on a straight-line basis generally over a four-year vesting period. Expense for stock performance awards is recognized based upon the fair value of the awards on the date of grant and the anticipated number of shares or units to be awarded
49
on a straight-line basis over the respective term of the award, or individual vesting portion of an award. Expense for the initial grant of RSUs is recognized ratably over the one-year vesting period based upon the fair value of the RSUs, as remeasured at the end of each period. If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model or the anticipated number of shares to be awarded change significantly, share-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. See additional information related to share-based compensation in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2015-03,
Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,
which requires debt issuance costs to be presented as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability in the balance sheet, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. The amortization of debt issuance costs will continue to be reported as interest expense in the statement of earnings. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by ASU 2015-03. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15,
Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated With Line-of-Credit Arrangements,
to clarify that debt issuance costs associated with a revolving line-of-credit arrangement may be presented as an asset, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The ASUs are to be applied on a retrospective basis and reported as a change in accounting principle and are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. As permitted by the ASUs, the Company adopted ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 during the fourth quarter of 2015. The adoption of these ASUs did not affect the Company’s results of operations or cash flows, but it required the Company to reclassify its deferred financing costs associated with its senior notes from other assets to long-term debt on a retrospective basis. The Company's consolidated balance sheets included deferred financing costs of
$3.5 million
and
$2.5 million
as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, respectively, that were reclassed from other assets to long-term debt. The debt issuance costs associated with the Company's revolving credit agreement continue to be presented in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17,
Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,
which requires entities to present all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-17 on a retrospective basis during the fourth quarter of 2015, resulting in a reclassification of
$0.8 million
and
$0.7 million
in current deferred tax assets as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, respectively, to noncurrent deferred tax assets and a reclassification of
$32.5 million
and
$27.5 million
in current deferred tax liabilities as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, respectively, to noncurrent deferred tax liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Impact of Prospective Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).
The ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605,
Revenue Recognition.
The standard provides a five-step analysis of revenue transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized, based upon the core principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Deferral of the Effective Date
, that resulted in a one year deferral of ASU 2014-09 for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07,
Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value Per Share (or its Equivalent)
. ASU 2015-07 removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy investments for which fair values are estimated using the net asset value practical expedient provided by ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurement
. Disclosures about investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share are limited under ASU 2015-07 to those investments for which the entity has elected to estimate the fair value using the net asset value practical expedient. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with retrospective application to all periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2015-07 during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. As of January 30, 2016, the Company's pension plan assets included an alternative investment fund for which the fair value of
$10.9 million
was estimated using the net asset value.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11,
Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,
which requires entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, simplifying the current guidance under which entities must measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using LIFO. The ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.
50
Approximately
95%
of the Company's consolidated inventory is measured using LIFO, which will remain unchanged upon the adoption of ASU 2015-11. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842),
which requires lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet. The ASU also eliminates the real-estate specific provisions in the current standard. For lessors, ASU 2016-02 modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements. Due to the large number of retail operating leases to which the Company is a party, the Company anticipates that the impact to its consolidated financial statements upon adoption in the first quarter of 2019 may be significant. However, the adoption of the ASU is not expected to trigger non-compliance with any covenant or other restriction under the provisions of any of the Company’s debt obligations.
2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND OTHER DISPOSITIONS
Discontinued Operations
The Company’s discontinued operations include the prior operations of our Avia, Nevados, Etienne Aigner and Vera Wang brands. The Company applied discontinued operations accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 205-20,
Presentation of Financial Statements –Discontinued Operations
. The Company had
no
discontinued operations in
2015
or
2014
. In 2013, discontinued operations included net sales of
$26.3 million
and a loss before income taxes of
$10.5 million
. Discontinued operations also included a net loss on disposition/impairment of
$11.5 million
in 2013.
Avia and Nevados
The Company purchased Avia and Nevados on February 17, 2011 as part of its acquisition of American Sporting Goods Corporation. On May 14, 2013, Caleres International Corp. ("CI"), (formerly known as Brown Shoe International Corp.), the sole shareholder of American Sporting Goods Corporation, entered into and simultaneously closed a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, CI and Galaxy Brand Holdings, Inc. (“the Buyer”), pursuant to which the Buyer acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of American Sporting Goods Corporation from CI. Under the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Avia and Nevados businesses were sold and the Company retained certain other businesses. In connection with the transaction, American Sporting Goods Corporation sold inventory to a third party unaffiliated with the Buyer and distributed certain assets to CI. The aggregate purchase price for the stock of American Sporting Goods Corporation and the provision of transition services was
$74.0 million
, subject to working capital adjustments, minus the amount of the pre-closing cash dividend declared by American Sporting Goods Corporation and paid to CI, representing proceeds from American Sporting Goods Corporation's sale of inventory. In this document, “ASG” refers to the subsidiary disposed on May 14, 2013, including the Avia and Nevados brands and excluding other retained businesses.
The Company received
$60.3 million
in cash and a promissory note of
$12.0 million
at closing, from the sale of stock, the sale of inventory, and for the provision of transitional services, less working capital adjustments. The promissory note was due November 14, 2013, earned interest at a
3%
annual rate, and was secured by a guarantee by American Sporting Goods Corporation and a lien on certain assets of ASG. In accordance with the terms of the promissory note, the Company received a payment of
$12.2 million
on November 14, 2013, representing the note principal and accrued interest. As a result of the sale of ASG, the Company recorded an impairment charge in the first quarter of 2013 of
$12.6 million
(
$12.6 million
after-tax,
$0.30
per diluted share), representing the difference in the fair value less costs to sell as compared to the carrying value of the net assets to be sold. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company recognized a gain upon disposition of the ASG subsidiary of
$1.0 million
(
$1.0 million
after tax,
$0.02
per diluted share). Avia and Nevados were previously included in the Brand Portfolio segment. Discontinued operations include net sales of
$20.3 million
and losses before income taxes of
$1.6 million
in 2013.
Vera Wang
During the first quarter of 2013, the Company decided not to renew the Vera Wang license agreement. The results of Vera Wang were previously included in the Brand Portfolio segment. Discontinued operations include net sales of
$5.7 million
and losses before income taxes of
$1.9 million
in 2013.
Etienne Aigner
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company terminated the Etienne Aigner license agreement due to a dispute with the licensor. On April 29, 2013, an agreement to resolve the dispute was reached, pursuant to which the Company paid Etienne Aigner
$6.5 million
. The results of Etienne Aigner were previously included in the Brand Portfolio segment. Discontinued operations included net sales of
$0.3 million
and losses before income taxes of
$7.0 million
in 2013.
51
Loss from discontinued operations for 2013 was as follows:
|
($ thousands)
|
2013
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
$
|
26,318
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
6,103
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other special charges, net
|
10,768
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
(10,480
|
)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
16
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes from discontinued operations
|
(10,496
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
5,922
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
$
|
(4,574
|
)
|
Other Dispositions
On December 12, 2014, Caleres Investment Company, Inc. ("CIC") (formerly known as Brown Shoe Investment Company, Inc.), the sole shareholder of Shoes.com, Inc., simultaneously entered into and closed a Stock Purchase Agreement by and among CIC and an affiliate of ShoeMe Technologies Limited ("the Purchaser"), pursuant to which the Purchaser acquired all of the outstanding capital stock, inventory and other assets of Shoes.com from CIC and the Company agreed to provide certain transition services. The aggregate purchase price of the sale was
$15.0 million
, subject to working capital and other adjustments. The Company received
$4.4 million
in cash and a
$7.5 million
face value secured convertible note ("convertible note") at closing. The convertible note requires installments over four years with the first principal payment of
$1.25 million
due on July 1, 2017 and quarterly installments of
$0.6 million
thereafter, plus accrued interest, until it matures on
December 12, 2019
. Interest accrues at an annual rate of
6%
until December 11, 2016,
7%
until December 11, 2017,
8%
until December 11, 2018, and
9%
until the maturity date. The principal and outstanding accrued interest is convertible into common stock of the Purchaser at a specified conversion price per share, at the Company's option, or automatically upon a qualified initial public offering ("IPO") by the Purchaser at the IPO price. The fair value of the convertible note of
$7.1 million
and
$7.0 million
at
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, respectively, is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognized interest income of
$0.5 million
in
2015
and an immaterial amount of interest in
2014
.
After consideration of working capital adjustments and performance obligations related to our transition services, the net purchase price was
$10.1 million
. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain on the sale of the subsidiary of
$4.7 million
, representing the difference in the fair value of proceeds less costs to sell, as compared to the carrying value of the net assets. In response to the sale, the Company incurred restructuring and other special charges of
$1.5 million
, primarily for severance, to eliminate certain positions supporting the Company's e-commerce platforms as well as positions in other administrative functions. These charges included
$0.8 million
within the Famous Footwear segment,
$0.3 million
within the Brand Portfolio segment and
$0.4 million
within the Other category. The Company recognized tax benefits of
$6.6 million
in 2014 associated with the disposition and an additional
$1.7 million
in 2015 upon settlement of the tax attributes associated with the disposition. These tax benefits were driven in part by the utilization of operating and capital loss carryforwards that previously were not anticipated to be utilized, and therefore, fully reserved on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.
The operating results of Shoes.com were included in the Famous Footwear segment in continuing operations through December 12, 2014.
The operations of Shoes.com were not significant to the Famous Footwear segment or the Company's financial results. In accordance with ASU No. 2014-08,
Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity,
which the Company adopted during the third quarter of 2014, the financial position and operating results of Shoes.com were not classified as a discontinued operation as the disposition did not represent a strategic shift resulting in a major impact on the Company's operations or financial results.
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company uses the two-class method to compute basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders. In periods of net loss, no effect is given to the Company’s participating securities since they do not contractually participate in the losses of the Company.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders:
52
|
(in $ thousands, except per share amounts)
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
|
NUMERATOR
|
|||||||||||
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
$
|
81,824
|
|
$
|
82,943
|
|
$
|
53,982
|
|
||
|
Net (earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(345
|
)
|
(93
|
)
|
177
|
|
|||||
|
Net earnings allocated to participating securities
|
(2,587
|
)
|
(3,068
|
)
|
(2,304
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
78,892
|
|
79,782
|
|
51,855
|
|
|||||
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16,086)
|
|
|||||
|
Net loss allocated to participating securities
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
687
|
|
|||||
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(15,399)
|
|
|||||
|
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. after allocation of earnings to participating securities
|
$
|
78,892
|
|
$
|
79,782
|
|
$
|
36,456
|
|
||
|
DENOMINATOR
|
|||||||||||
|
Denominator for basic continuing and discontinued earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
|
42,455
|
|
42,071
|
|
41,356
|
|
|||||
|
Dilutive effect of share-based awards for continuing operations and discontinued operations
|
201
|
|
203
|
|
297
|
|
|||||
|
Denominator for diluted continuing and discontinued earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
|
42,656
|
|
42,274
|
|
41,653
|
|
|||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|||||||||||
|
From continuing operations
|
$
|
1.86
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
||
|
From discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|||||
|
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
|
$
|
1.86
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|||||||||||
|
From continuing operations
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
||
|
From discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|||||
|
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
||
Options to purchase
56,997
,
64,497
and
86,247
shares of common stock in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively, were not included in the denominator for diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders because the effect would be antidilutive.
4. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER INITIATIVES
Portfolio Realignment
The Company's portfolio realignment efforts included the sale of ASG, the sale and closure of certain sourcing and supply chain assets, closing or relocating numerous underperforming or poorly aligned retail stores, the termination of the Etienne Aigner license agreement, the election not to renew the Vera Wang license in accordance with agreement terms and other infrastructure changes. These portfolio realignment efforts began in 2011 and were completed in 2013. Expenses for these initiatives are reflected in both continuing operations and discontinued operations.
53
The following is a summary of the Company’s portfolio realignment expense for our continuing and discontinued operations for 2013:
|
2013
|
|||||||||||
|
($ millions, except per share data)
|
Pre-tax Expense
|
After-tax Expense
|
Loss Per Diluted Share
|
||||||||
|
Continuing Operations
|
|||||||||||
|
Business exits and cost reductions
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
||
|
Non-cash impairments/dispositions
|
4.7
|
|
4.7
|
|
0.11
|
|
|||||
|
Total Continuing Operations
|
5.9
|
|
5.5
|
|
0.13
|
|
|||||
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|||||||||||
|
Business exits and cost reductions
|
13.3
|
|
6.4
|
|
0.13
|
|
|||||
|
Non-cash impairments/dispositions
|
11.5
|
|
11.5
|
|
0.27
|
|
|||||
|
Total Discontinued Operations
|
24.8
|
|
17.9
|
|
0.40
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
30.7
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
||
The business exits and cost reductions associated with continuing operations were recorded within restructuring and other special charges, net and cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of earnings. The business exits and cost reductions associated with discontinued operations were recorded within loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, in the consolidated statements of earnings. The non-cash impairments/dispositions of the Company’s continuing operations were recorded within impairment of assets held for sale in the consolidated statements of earnings. The non-cash impairments/dispositions of the Company’s discontinued operations were recorded within disposition/impairment of discontinued operations, net of tax in the consolidated statements of earnings. The non-cash impairments/dispositions are included in Other in the following table. All of the
$5.9 million
of expenses for portfolio realignment that were recorded in continuing operations during 2013 were included in the Brand Portfolio segment.
The following is a summary of the charges and settlements by category of costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total by Classification
|
||||||||||||||||
|
($ millions)
|
Employee
|
Markdowns and Royalty Shortfalls
|
Facility
|
Other
|
Total
|
Continuing Operations
|
Discontinued Operations
|
||||||||||||||
|
Reserve balance at February 2, 2013
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
Additional charges in 2013
|
2.6
|
|
2.7
|
|
0.1
|
|
25.3
|
|
30.7
|
|
5.9
|
|
24.8
|
|
|||||||
|
Amounts settled in 2013
|
(3.3
|
)
|
(2.9
|
)
|
(2.0
|
)
|
(25.6
|
)
|
(33.8
|
)
|
(9.7
|
)
|
(24.1
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Reserve balance at February 1, 2014
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
Amounts settled in 2014
|
(0.9
|
)
|
—
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Reserve balance at January 31, 2015
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Amounts settled in 2015
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Reserve balance at January 31, 2015
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Sale of Sourcing and Supply Chain Assets
On April 30, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to sell certain of its supply chain and sourcing assets (“Sale Agreement”) for
$9.0 million
, including
$1.5 million
in cash and a
$7.5 million
promissory note, subject to working capital adjustments. The sale closed during the second quarter of 2013. In anticipation of this transaction, the Company recognized an impairment charge in the first quarter of 2013 of
$4.7 million
(
$4.7 million
after tax, or
$0.11
per diluted share) to adjust the assets to their estimated fair value. The promissory note required installments over two years and accrued interest at
5%
. In accordance with the terms of the promissory note, the final principal payment was received during the third quarter of 2015.
Organizational Change
During 2014, the Company incurred costs of
$1.9 million
(
$1.2 million
on an after-tax basis, or
$0.03
per diluted share) related to a management change at the corporate headquarters, with no corresponding charges in 2015 or 2013. These costs were recognized as restructuring and other special charges, net and included in the Other category.
54
Disposition of Shoes.com
As further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in response to the sale of Shoes.com, the Company incurred restructuring and other special charges of
$1.5 million
in 2014. The restructuring reserve of
$1.5 million
as of
January 31, 2015
was included in employee compensation and benefits on the consolidated balance sheets, with no corresponding reserve as of
January 30, 2016
.
5. RETIREMENT AND OTHER BENEFIT PLANS
The Company sponsors pension plans in both the United States and Canada. The Company’s domestic pension plans cover substantially all United States employees. Under the domestic plans, salaried, management and certain hourly employees’ pension benefits are based on a two-rate formula applied to each year of service. Participants receive the larger of the accrued benefit as of December 31, 2015 (based on service commencing at the date of hire and a
35
-year service cap and an average annual salary for the
five
highest consecutive years during the last
10
year period) and the benefit calculated under the current plan provisions using pay and service from the date of hire. Generally, under the current plan provisions, a participant receives credit for
one
year of service for each
365
days of employment as an eligible employee with the Company commencing after the employee's date of participation in the plan, up to
30
years. A service credit of
0.825%
is applied to that portion of the average annual salary for the last
10
years that does not exceed “covered compensation,” which is the
35
-year average compensation subject to FICA tax based on a participant’s year of birth, and a service credit of
1.425%
is applied to that portion of the average salary during those
10
years that exceeds said level.
The Company’s Canadian pension plans cover certain employees based on plan specifications. Under the Canadian plans, employees’ pension benefits are based on the employee’s highest consecutive
five
years of compensation during the
10
years before retirement. The Company’s funding policy for all plans is to make the minimum annual contributions required by applicable regulations. The Company also maintains an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”).
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company sponsors unfunded defined benefit postretirement life insurance plans that cover both salaried and hourly employees who became eligible for benefits by January 1, 1995. The life insurance plans provide coverage of up to $20 thousand dollars for qualifying retired employees.
Benefit Obligations
The following table sets forth changes in benefit obligations, including all domestic and Canadian plans:
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
||||||
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$
|
362,340
|
|
$
|
279,964
|
|
$
|
1,512
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
||
|
Service cost
|
12,639
|
|
9,650
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Interest cost
|
14,321
|
|
14,230
|
|
56
|
|
49
|
|
||||||
|
Plan participants’ contribution
|
11
|
|
12
|
|
9
|
|
4
|
|
||||||
|
Plan amendments
|
91
|
|
(11,671
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
(49,318
|
)
|
83,105
|
|
(31
|
)
|
483
|
|
||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(13,490
|
)
|
(11,814
|
)
|
(135
|
)
|
(143
|
)
|
||||||
|
Curtailments
|
(120
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Foreign exchange rate changes
|
(397
|
)
|
(1,136
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
$
|
326,077
|
|
$
|
362,340
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
$
|
1,512
|
|
||
The accumulated benefit obligation for the United States pension plans was
$311.6 million
and
$342.6 million
as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the Canadian pension plans was
$3.5 million
and
$4.3 million
as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, respectively.
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|||||||||
|
Weighted–average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations, end of year
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
||
|
Discount rate
|
4.70
|
%
|
3.90
|
%
|
4.70
|
%
|
3.90
|
%
|
||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
3.00
|
%
|
3.00
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
||
55
As of January 30, 2016, the Company is using the RP-2014 Bottom Quartile tables, projected using generational scale MP-2015, an updated projection scale issued by the Society of Actuaries in 2015, to estimate the actuarial gain or loss. Actuarial gains, related to the change in mortality tables, reduced the projected benefit obligation by approximately
$7.9 million
as of January 30, 2016.
During 2014, the Company announced amendments to the domestic qualified pension plan and the SERP, including certain changes to eligibility and service period requirements as well as changes to the benefit formula, including the calculation of participants' final average compensation. Certain changes became effective in January 2015, while other changes became effective in January 2016. These plan amendments increased the pension liability by
$0.1 million
as of January 30, 2016 and decreased the pension liability by
$11.7 million
as of January 31, 2015.
Plan Assets
Pension assets are managed in accordance with the prudent investor standards of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The plan’s investment objective is to earn a competitive total return on assets, while also ensuring plan assets are adequately managed to provide for future pension obligations. This results in the protection of plan surplus and is accomplished by matching the duration of the projected benefit obligation using leveraged fixed income instruments and, while maintaining an equity commitment, managing an equity overlay strategy. The overlay strategy is intended to protect the managed equity portfolios against adverse stock market environments. The Company delegates investment management of the plan assets to specialists in each asset class and regularly monitors manager performance and compliance with investment guidelines. The Company’s overall investment strategy is to achieve a mix of approximately
97%
of investments for long-term growth and
3%
for near-term benefit payments with a wide diversification of asset types, fund strategies and fund managers. The target allocations for plan assets for
2015
were
70%
equities and
30%
debt securities. Allocations may change periodically based upon changing market conditions. Equities did not include any Company stock at
January 30, 2016
or
January 31, 2015
.
Assets of the Canadian pension plans, which total approximately
$4.0 million
at
January 30, 2016
, were invested
61%
in equity funds,
36%
in bond funds and
3%
in money market funds. The Canadian pension plans did not include any Company stock as of
January 30, 2016
or
January 31, 2015
.
A financial instrument’s level within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Refer to further discussion on the fair value hierarchy in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements. Following is a description of the pension plan investments measured at fair value, including the general classification of such investments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
|
•
|
Cash and cash equivalents include cash collateral and margin as well as money market funds. The fair values are based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency and therefore are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
•
|
Investments in corporate stocks – common, U.S. government securities, mutual funds, preferred securities, real estate investment trusts and S&P 500 Index put and call options (traded on security exchanges) are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because the fair values are based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency.
|
|
•
|
Interest rate swap agreements are valued at fair value based on vendor-quoted pricing for which inputs are observable and can be corroborated; therefore, these are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
•
|
The alternative investment fund, with a fair value of
$10.9 million
and
$10.7 million
as of
January 30, 2016
and January 31, 2015, respectively, is an investment in a pool of long-duration domestic investment grade assets. This investment is valued at fair value based on vendor-quoted pricing for which inputs are observable and can be corroborated and therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
•
|
The unallocated insurance contract is valued at contract value, which approximates fair value; therefore, this contract is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The unallocated insurance contract fair value was
$0.1 million
as of both
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
.
|
56
The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets at
January 30, 2016
by asset category are as follows:
|
Fair Value Measurements at January 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
||||||||
|
Asset
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
42,881
|
|
$
|
42,881
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
U.S. government securities
|
129,846
|
|
129,846
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Mutual fund
|
27,662
|
|
27,662
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Corporate stocks – common
|
171,898
|
|
171,898
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Preferred securities
|
657
|
|
657
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
S&P 500 Index options
|
1,742
|
|
1,742
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
(6,028
|
)
|
—
|
|
(6,028
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Alternative investment fund
|
10,901
|
|
—
|
|
10,901
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Unallocated insurance contract
|
79
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
79
|
|
||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
379,638
|
|
374,686
|
|
$
|
4,873
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|||||
The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets at
January 31, 2015
by asset category are as follows:
|
Fair Value Measurements at January 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
||||||||
|
Asset
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
95,560
|
|
$
|
95,560
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
U.S. government securities
|
84,141
|
|
84,141
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Mutual fund
|
29,240
|
|
29,240
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Corporate stocks – common
|
184,486
|
|
184,486
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
S&P 500 Index options
|
11,731
|
|
11,731
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Preferred securities
|
286
|
|
286
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
7,268
|
|
—
|
|
7,268
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Alternative investment fund
|
10,733
|
|
—
|
|
10,733
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Unallocated insurance contract
|
89
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
89
|
|
||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
423,534
|
|
$
|
405,444
|
|
$
|
18,001
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
||||
The following table sets forth changes in the fair value of plan assets, including all domestic and Canadian plans:
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
$
|
423,534
|
|
$
|
356,320
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
(30,091
|
)
|
79,986
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Employer contributions
|
90
|
|
206
|
|
126
|
|
139
|
|
|||||||
|
Plan participants’ contributions
|
11
|
|
12
|
|
9
|
|
4
|
|
|||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(13,490
|
)
|
(11,814
|
)
|
(135
|
)
|
(143
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Foreign exchange rate changes
|
(416
|
)
|
(1,176
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
$
|
379,638
|
|
$
|
423,534
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
Funded Status
The over-funded status as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
for pension benefits was
$53.6 million
and
$61.2 million
, respectively. The under-funded status as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
for other postretirement benefits was
$1.4 million
and
$1.5 million
, respectively.
57
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|||||||
|
Prepaid pension costs (noncurrent assets)
|
$
|
64,890
|
|
$
|
73,324
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Accrued benefit liabilities (current liability)
|
(3,512
|
)
|
(2,675
|
)
|
(141
|
)
|
(142
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Accrued benefit liabilities (noncurrent liability)
|
(7,817
|
)
|
(9,455
|
)
|
(1,270
|
)
|
(1,370
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net amount recognized at end of year
|
$
|
53,561
|
|
$
|
61,194
|
|
$
|
(1,411
|
)
|
$
|
(1,512
|
)
|
|||
The projected benefit obligation, the accumulated benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets and for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets, which includes only the Company’s SERP, were as follows:
|
Projected Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plan Assets
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plan Assets
|
||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|||||||
|
End of Year
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
$
|
11,326
|
|
$
|
12,130
|
|
$
|
11,326
|
|
$
|
12,130
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
10,747
|
|
10,770
|
|
10,747
|
|
10,770
|
|
|||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation exceeds assets for all of the Company’s other postretirement benefit plans.
The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit (income) cost at
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, and the expected amortization of the
January 30, 2016
amounts as components of net periodic benefit (income) cost for fiscal year 2016 are as follows:
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|||||||
|
Components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
$
|
11,976
|
|
$
|
4,872
|
|
$
|
(947
|
)
|
$
|
(1,068
|
)
|
|||
|
Net prior service (credit) cost
|
(5,673
|
)
|
(7,037
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
|
$
|
6,303
|
|
$
|
(2,165
|
)
|
$
|
(947
|
)
|
$
|
(1,068
|
)
|
|||
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|||||
|
Expected amortization, net of tax:
|
|||||||||||
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
590
|
|
|
$
|
(217
|
)
|
|||
|
Amortization of net prior service cost
|
|
(2,090
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
$
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(217
|
)
|
|||
Net Periodic Benefit (Income) Cost
Net periodic benefit (income) cost for
2015
,
2014
and
2013
for all domestic and Canadian plans included the following components:
58
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||||
|
Service cost
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
$
|
9,650
|
|
$
|
10,638
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Interest cost
|
14,321
|
|
14,230
|
|
13,241
|
|
56
|
|
49
|
|
55
|
|
||||||||
|
Expected return on assets
|
(31,682
|
)
|
(24,757
|
)
|
(24,773
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
604
|
|
201
|
|
954
|
|
(220
|
)
|
(432
|
)
|
(351
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Prior service (credit) cost
|
(1,906
|
)
|
27
|
|
13
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Curtailments
|
(184
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Total net periodic benefit (income) cost
|
$
|
(6,208
|
)
|
$
|
(649
|
)
|
$
|
73
|
|
$
|
(164
|
)
|
$
|
(383
|
)
|
$
|
(296
|
)
|
||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit (income) cost:
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||
|
Discount rate
|
3.90
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
4.50
|
%
|
3.90
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
4.50
|
%
|
||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
3.00
|
%
|
3.00
|
%
|
3.50
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
8.25
|
%
|
8.25
|
%
|
8.25
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
||
The net actuarial loss (gain) subject to amortization is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average future service of active plan participants as of the measurement date. The prior service (credit) cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average future service of active plan participants benefiting under the plan at the time of each plan amendment.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the plan’s investment portfolio. Assumed projected rates of return for each asset class were selected after analyzing experience and future expectations of the returns. The overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed based on the target allocation for each asset class.
Expected Cash Flows
Information about expected cash flows for all pension and postretirement benefit plans follows:
|
Pension Benefits
|
||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Funded Plan
|
|
SERP
|
|
Total
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|
||||||
|
Employer Contributions
|
||||||||||||||
|
2016 expected contributions to plan trusts
|
$
|
101
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
2016 expected contributions to plan participants
|
—
|
|
3,510
|
|
3,510
|
|
141
|
|
||||||
|
Expected Benefit Payments
|
||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
$
|
11,440
|
|
$
|
3,510
|
|
$
|
14,950
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
||
|
2017
|
12,207
|
|
1,174
|
|
13,381
|
|
132
|
|
||||||
|
2018
|
12,995
|
|
1,778
|
|
14,773
|
|
123
|
|
||||||
|
2019
|
13,744
|
|
945
|
|
14,689
|
|
114
|
|
||||||
|
2020
|
14,461
|
|
2,211
|
|
16,672
|
|
106
|
|
||||||
|
2021 – 2025
|
81,154
|
|
2,276
|
|
83,430
|
|
404
|
|
||||||
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company’s domestic defined contribution 401(k) plan covers salaried and certain hourly employees. Company contributions represent a partial matching of employee contributions, generally up to a maximum of
3.5%
of the employee’s salary and bonus. The Company’s expense for this plan was
$3.6 million
in
2015
,
$3.0 million
in
2014
, and
$3.4 million
in
2013
.
The Company’s Canadian defined contribution plan covers certain salaried and hourly employees. The Company makes contributions for all eligible employees, ranging from
3%
to
5%
of the employee’s salary. In addition, eligible employees may voluntarily contribute to the plan. The Company’s expense for this plan was
$0.2 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
.
59
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for the benefit of certain management employees. The investment funds offered to the participants generally correspond to the funds offered in the Company’s 401(k) plan and the account balance fluctuates with the investment returns on those funds. The Deferred Compensation Plan permits the deferral of up to
50%
of base salary and
100%
of compensation received under the Company’s annual incentive plan. The deferrals are held in a separate trust, which has been established by the Company to administer the Deferred Compensation Plan. The assets of the trust are subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors in the event that the Company becomes insolvent. Consequently, the trust qualifies as a grantor trust for income tax purposes (i.e., a “Rabbi Trust”). The liabilities of the Deferred Compensation Plan of
$3.4 million
and
$2.9 million
as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, respectively, are presented in employee compensation and benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The assets held by the trust of
$3.4 million
as of
January 30, 2016
and
$2.9 million
as of
January 31, 2015
are classified as trading securities within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, with changes in the deferred compensation charged to selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan, whereby deferred compensation amounts are valued as if invested in the Company’s common stock through the use of phantom stock units (“PSUs”). Under the plan, each participating director’s account is credited with the number of PSUs equal to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that the participant could purchase or receive with the amount of the deferred compensation, based upon the fair value (as determined based on the average of the high and low prices) of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal quarter when the cash compensation was earned. Dividend equivalents are paid on PSUs at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s common stock and are re-invested in additional PSUs at the next fiscal quarter-end. The PSUs are payable in cash based on the number of PSUs credited to the participating director’s account, valued on the basis of the fair value at fiscal quarter-end on or following termination of the director’s service. The liabilities of the plan of
$1.7 million
as of
January 30, 2016
and
$2.1 million
as of
January 31, 2015
are based on
56,629
and
67,488
outstanding PSUs, respectively, and are presented in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the PSUs are charged to selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.
6. INCOME TAXES
The components of earnings before income taxes from continuing operations consisted of domestic earnings before income taxes from continuing operations of
$68.2 million
,
$70.8 million
and
$40.9 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively, and foreign earnings before income taxes from continuing operations of
$40.6 million
,
$39.3 million
and
$36.8 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively. In addition to the income tax expense associated with continuing operations, we also recorded income tax benefits associated with the loss from discontinued operations of
$5.9 million
in 2013.
The components of income tax provision (benefit) on earnings from continuing operations were as follows:
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Federal
|
||||||||||||
|
Current
|
$
|
9,530
|
|
$
|
27,311
|
|
$
|
14,621
|
|
|||
|
Deferred
|
11,202
|
|
(9,502
|
)
|
260
|
|
||||||
|
20,732
|
|
17,809
|
|
14,881
|
|
|||||||
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Current
|
497
|
|
5,501
|
|
5,770
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred
|
1,176
|
|
(642
|
)
|
(1,210
|
)
|
||||||
|
1,673
|
|
4,859
|
|
4,560
|
|
|||||||
|
Foreign
|
4,537
|
|
4,516
|
|
4,317
|
|
||||||
|
Total income tax provision
|
$
|
26,942
|
|
$
|
27,184
|
|
$
|
23,758
|
|
|||
The Company made federal, state and foreign tax payments, net of refunds, of
$22.1 million
,
$20.1 million
and
$5.0 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively.
60
The differences between the income tax provision reflected in the consolidated financial statements and the amounts calculated at the federal statutory income tax rate of
35%
were as follows:
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes at statutory rate
|
$
|
38,068
|
|
$
|
38,544
|
|
$
|
27,208
|
|
|||
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
2,481
|
|
3,159
|
|
2,964
|
|
||||||
|
Foreign earnings taxed at lower rates
|
(9,491
|
)
|
(8,882
|
)
|
(8,090
|
)
|
||||||
|
Non-deductibility of impairment of assets held for sale
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,631
|
|
||||||
|
Tax on international subsidiary dividend
|
—
|
|
1,040
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Disposal and settlement of Shoes.com
|
(1,701
|
)
|
(7,428
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Valuation allowance release on state loss carryforwards
|
(1,635
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Valuation allowance release on other tax carryforwards
|
(1,367
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other
|
587
|
|
751
|
|
45
|
|
||||||
|
Total income tax provision
|
$
|
26,942
|
|
$
|
27,184
|
|
$
|
23,758
|
|
|||
In
2015
, the Company's effective tax rate was impacted by several discrete tax benefits which totaled
$5.1 million
for the year. These discrete tax benefits primarily reflected the utilization of operating loss, capital loss and other carryforwards that were previously not anticipated to be utilized and were therefore fully reserved on the consolidated balance sheet. A portion of these carryforwards became utilizable upon conversion of the Company's primary retail entity to an LLC early in 2015. In addition, certain additional tax carryforwards were able to be utilized upon settlement of negotiations related to the tax attributes associated with the sale of our Shoes.com subsidiary. If these discrete tax benefits had not been recognized, the Company's full fiscal year 2015 effective tax rate would have been
29.5%
, which is
1.1%
lower than 2014, driven by a lower state tax rate and a higher mix of earnings in international jurisdictions.
The other category of income tax provision principally represents the impact of expenses that are not deductible or partially deductible for federal income tax purposes and adjustments in the amounts of deferred tax assets that are anticipated to be realized.
Significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
|
($ thousands)
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
|
||||
|
Deferred Tax Assets
|
||||||||
|
Employee benefits, compensation and insurance
|
$
|
24,740
|
|
$
|
26,430
|
|
||
|
Accrued expenses
|
16,118
|
|
16,539
|
|
||||
|
Postretirement and postemployment benefit plans
|
721
|
|
862
|
|
||||
|
Deferred rent
|
7,269
|
|
6,285
|
|
||||
|
Accounts receivable reserves
|
7,946
|
|
7,563
|
|
||||
|
Net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward/carryback
|
7,943
|
|
9,483
|
|
||||
|
Capital loss carryforward
|
2,368
|
|
5,188
|
|
||||
|
Foreign tax credit carryforward
|
—
|
|
1,098
|
|
||||
|
Inventory capitalization and inventory reserves
|
1,620
|
|
1,683
|
|
||||
|
Intangible assets
|
—
|
|
4,865
|
|
||||
|
Depreciation
|
630
|
|
3,957
|
|
||||
|
Other
|
1,346
|
|
1,907
|
|
||||
|
Total deferred tax assets, before valuation allowance
|
70,701
|
|
85,860
|
|
||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(6,544
|
)
|
(11,514
|
)
|
||||
|
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
64,157
|
|
74,346
|
|
||||
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
||||||||
|
Retirement plans
|
(21,051
|
)
|
(23,822
|
)
|
||||
|
LIFO inventory valuation
|
(61,585
|
)
|
(56,525
|
)
|
||||
|
Capitalized software
|
(10,525
|
)
|
(12,721
|
)
|
||||
|
Other
|
(786
|
)
|
(1,118
|
)
|
||||
|
Intangible assets
|
(631
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(94,578
|
)
|
(94,186
|
)
|
||||
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
(30,421
|
)
|
(19,840
|
)
|
||||
61
As of
January 30, 2016
, the Company had various state net operating loss carryforwards with tax values totaling
$7.8 million
. A valuation allowance of
$3.0 million
has been established related to these operating loss carryforwards. The remaining net operating loss will be carried forward to future tax years. The Company also has valuation allowances of
$2.4 million
related to capital loss carryforwards and
$1.1 million
related to share-based compensation.
As of
January 30, 2016
,
no
deferred taxes have been provided on the accumulated unremitted earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries that are not subject to United States income tax. The Company periodically evaluates its foreign investment opportunities and plans, as well as its foreign working capital needs, to determine the level of investment required and, accordingly, determine the level of foreign earnings that is considered indefinitely reinvested. Based upon that evaluation, earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries that are not otherwise subject to United States taxation, except for the Company’s Canadian subsidiary, are considered to be indefinitely reinvested, and accordingly, deferred taxes have not been provided. If changes occur in future investment opportunities and plans, those changes will be reflected when known and may result in providing residual United States deferred taxes on unremitted foreign earnings. If the Company’s unremitted foreign earnings were not considered indefinitely reinvested as of
January 30, 2016
additional deferred taxes of approximately
$43.8 million
would have been provided.
Uncertain Tax Positions
ASC 740,
Income Taxes
, establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. The standard clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. The standard also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
($ thousands)
|
||||
|
Balance at February 2, 2013
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years due to a lapse in the statute of limitations
|
(134
|
)
|
||
|
Balance at February 1, 2014
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years due to a lapse in the statute of limitations
|
—
|
|
||
|
Balance at January 31, 2015
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
Amounts settled and utilized for current tax obligations
|
(636
|
)
|
||
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
(379
|
)
|
||
|
Balance at January 30, 2016
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
If the unrecognized tax benefits were to be recognized in full, the net amount that would be reflected in the income tax provision in prior years, thereby impacting the effective tax rate, would have been
$1.1 million
at
January 31, 2015
and
February 1, 2014
.
Estimated interest related to the underpayment of income taxes was classified as a component of the income tax provision in the consolidated statements of earnings and was insignificant in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
.
For federal purposes, the Company’s tax years
2011
to
2013
(fiscal years ending
January 28, 2012
,
February 2, 2013
and
February 1, 2014
) remain open to examination. The Company also files tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions and numerous states for which various tax years are subject to examination. The Company does not expect any significant changes to its liability for unrecognized tax benefits during the next 12 months.
7. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company's reportable segments are Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio.
The Famous Footwear segment is comprised of Famous Footwear and Famous.com. In addition, Shoes.com was included through December 12, 2014 (the date of sale). Famous Footwear operated
1,046
stores at the end of
2015
, primarily selling branded footwear for the entire family.
The Brand Portfolio segment is comprised of our branded footwear, our branded retail stores and e-commerce sites associated with those brands. This segment sources and markets licensed, branded and private-label footwear primarily to national chains, department stores,
62
online retailers, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs as well as Company-owned Famous Footwear, Naturalizer and Sam Edelman stores, and e-commerce businesses. The Brand Portfolio segment included
80
branded retail stores in the United States and
85
branded retail stores in Canada at the end of
2015
, selling primarily Naturalizer brand footwear.
The Company’s Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio reportable segments are operating units that are managed separately. An operating segment’s performance is evaluated and resources are allocated based primarily on operating earnings (loss). Operating earnings (loss) represent gross profit, less selling and administrative expenses, restructuring and other special charges, net and impairment of assets held for sale. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Intersegment sales are generally recorded at a profit to the selling segment. All intersegment earnings related to inventory on hand at the purchasing segment are eliminated against the earnings of the selling segment.
Corporate assets, administrative expenses, and other costs and recoveries that are not allocated to the operating units are reported in the Other category.
Following is a summary of certain key financial measures for the respective periods. External sales, intersegment sales and operating earnings (loss) exclude discontinued operations. Segment assets, depreciation and amortization, amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount, purchases of property and equipment and capitalized software include both continuing operations and discontinued operations.
|
($ thousands)
|
Famous Footwear
|
Brand Portfolio
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||
|
Fiscal 2015
|
||||||||||||
|
External sales
|
$
|
1,572,665
|
|
$
|
1,004,765
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,577,430
|
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
—
|
|
100,186
|
|
—
|
|
100,186
|
|
||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
25,842
|
|
9,339
|
|
16,258
|
|
51,439
|
|
||||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,167
|
|
1,167
|
|
||||
|
Operating earnings (loss)
|
109,030
|
|
66,578
|
|
(40,501
|
)
|
135,107
|
|
||||
|
Segment assets
|
542,842
|
|
534,137
|
|
226,344
|
|
1,303,323
|
|
||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
48,761
|
|
18,340
|
|
6,378
|
|
73,479
|
|
||||
|
Capitalized software
|
2,538
|
|
—
|
|
5,197
|
|
7,735
|
|
||||
|
Fiscal 2014
|
||||||||||||
|
External sales
|
$
|
1,589,258
|
|
$
|
982,451
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,571,709
|
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
—
|
|
114,408
|
|
—
|
|
114,408
|
|
||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
26,581
|
|
8,974
|
|
16,060
|
|
51,615
|
|
||||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,400
|
|
2,400
|
|
||||
|
Operating earnings (loss)
|
104,581
|
|
73,403
|
|
(52,050
|
)
|
125,934
|
|
||||
|
Segment assets
|
458,847
|
|
518,099
|
|
237,381
|
|
1,214,327
|
|
||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
33,001
|
|
6,105
|
|
5,846
|
|
44,952
|
|
||||
|
Capitalized software
|
198
|
|
58
|
|
4,830
|
|
5,086
|
|
||||
|
Fiscal 2013
|
||||||||||||
|
External sales
|
$
|
1,588,552
|
|
$
|
924,561
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,513,113
|
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
—
|
|
132,596
|
|
—
|
|
132,596
|
|
||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
25,917
|
|
13,440
|
|
15,972
|
|
55,329
|
|
||||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,513
|
|
2,513
|
|
||||
|
Operating earnings (loss)
|
105,382
|
|
39,909
|
|
(46,674
|
)
|
98,617
|
|
||||
|
Segment assets
|
448,549
|
|
514,902
|
|
182,889
|
|
1,146,340
|
|
||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
32,728
|
|
6,026
|
|
5,214
|
|
43,968
|
|
||||
|
Capitalized software
|
193
|
|
122
|
|
4,920
|
|
5,235
|
|
||||
63
Following is a reconciliation of operating earnings to earnings before income taxes from continuing operations:
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Operating earnings
|
$
|
135,107
|
|
$
|
125,934
|
|
$
|
98,617
|
|
|||
|
Interest expense
|
(16,589
|
)
|
(20,445
|
)
|
(21,254
|
)
|
||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(10,651
|
)
|
(420
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Interest income
|
899
|
|
379
|
|
377
|
|
||||||
|
Gain on sale of subsidiary
|
—
|
|
4,679
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Earnings before income taxes from continuing operations
|
$
|
108,766
|
|
$
|
110,127
|
|
$
|
77,740
|
|
|||
For geographic purposes, the domestic operations include the wholesale distribution of licensed, branded and private-label footwear to a variety of retail customers, including the Company’s Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio stores and e-commerce businesses, as well as the Company's domestic retail operations.
The Company’s foreign operations primarily consist of wholesale and retail operations in the Far East and Canada. The Far East operations include first-cost transactions, where footwear is sold at foreign ports to customers who then import the footwear into the United States and other countries.
A summary of the Company’s net sales and long-lived assets by geographic area were as follows:
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Net Sales
|
||||||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
2,342,590
|
|
$
|
2,318,530
|
|
$
|
2,258,605
|
|
|||
|
Far East
|
177,654
|
|
194,296
|
|
193,725
|
|
||||||
|
Canada
|
57,186
|
|
58,883
|
|
60,783
|
|
||||||
|
Total net sales
|
$
|
2,577,430
|
|
$
|
2,571,709
|
|
$
|
2,513,113
|
|
|||
|
Long-Lived Assets
|
||||||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
417,198
|
|
$
|
412,822
|
|
$
|
344,413
|
|
|||
|
Canada
|
8,596
|
|
8,773
|
|
7,159
|
|
||||||
|
Far East
|
2,193
|
|
2,336
|
|
2,454
|
|
||||||
|
Latin America, Europe and other
|
271
|
|
248
|
|
236
|
|
||||||
|
Total long-lived assets
|
$
|
428,258
|
|
$
|
424,179
|
|
$
|
354,262
|
|
|||
Long-lived assets consisted primarily of property and equipment, intangible assets, prepaid pension costs, goodwill and other noncurrent assets.
8. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
($ thousands)
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
|
||||
|
Land and buildings
|
$
|
38,300
|
|
$
|
40,078
|
|
||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
196,960
|
|
183,466
|
|
||||
|
Technology equipment
|
49,575
|
|
53,406
|
|
||||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
35,805
|
|
35,988
|
|
||||
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
121,186
|
|
117,254
|
|
||||
|
Construction in progress
|
33,924
|
|
8,504
|
|
||||
|
Property and equipment
|
475,750
|
|
438,696
|
|
||||
|
Allowances for depreciation
|
(296,740
|
)
|
(288,953
|
)
|
||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
179,010
|
|
$
|
149,743
|
|
||
64
Useful lives of property and equipment are as follows:
|
Buildings
|
5-30 years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
5-20 years
|
|
Technology equipment
|
2-10 years
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
4-20 years
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
3-10 years
|
The Company recorded charges for impairment, primarily for leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures in the Company’s retail stores, of
$2.8 million
,
$2.0 million
and
$1.6 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively. All of the impairment charges in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
are included in selling and administrative expenses. Fair value was based on estimated future cash flows to be generated by retail stores, discounted at a market rate of interest.
Interest costs for major asset additions are capitalized during the construction or development period and amortized over the lives of the related assets. In 2015, the Company capitalized interest of
$0.3 million
related to its expansion and modernization project at its Lebanon, Tennessee distribution center, with no corresponding amounts capitalized in 2014 or 2013.
9. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and intangible assets were as follows:
|
($ thousands)
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
|
|||
|
Intangible Assets
|
|||||||
|
Famous Footwear
|
$
|
2,800
|
|
$
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
Brand Portfolio
|
183,068
|
|
183,068
|
|
|||
|
Total intangible assets
|
185,868
|
|
185,868
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated amortization
|
(68,923
|
)
|
(65,235
|
)
|
|||
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
116,945
|
|
120,633
|
|
|||
|
Goodwill
|
|||||||
|
Brand Portfolio
|
13,954
|
|
13,954
|
|
|||
|
Total goodwill
|
13,954
|
|
13,954
|
|
|||
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
$
|
130,899
|
|
$
|
134,587
|
|
|
On February 3, 2014, the Company entered into and simultaneously closed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company acquired the Franco Sarto trademarks. As consideration, the Company paid a cash purchase price of
$65.0 million
at the time of closing. As a result of entering into and closing the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company’s license agreement, granting the Company the right to sell footwear and other products using the Franco Sarto trademarks through 2019, was terminated. The purchase price of
$65.0 million
, as well as transaction costs of
$0.1 million
, are being amortized over a useful life of
40 years
.
In December 2014, in conjunction with the disposition of Shoes.com as further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company sold intangible assets of
$0.2 million
. The intangible assets were previously included in the Famous Footwear segment.
Intangible assets consist primarily of owned and licensed trademarks, of which
$20.8 million
as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
are not subject to amortization. All remaining intangible assets are subject to amortization and have useful lives ranging from
15
to
40 years
. Amortization expense for continuing operations related to intangible assets was
$3.7 million
,
$4.0 million
and
$6.0 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively. The Company estimates
$3.7 million
of amortization expense related to intangible assets in each of the years from
2016 through 2020
. As a result of its annual impairment testing, the Company did not record any impairment charges during
2015
,
2014
and
2013
related to intangible assets.
65
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate it might be impaired, using either the qualitative assessment or a fair value-based test. If, after completing the qualitative assessment, a company believes it is likely that a reporting unit is impaired, a discounted cash flow analysis is prepared to estimate fair value. A fair value-based test is applied at the reporting unit level, which is generally at or one level below the operating segment level. The test compares the fair value of the Company’s reporting units to the carrying value of those reporting units. This test requires significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. The fair value of goodwill is determined using an estimate of future cash flows of the reporting units and a risk-adjusted discount rate to compute a net present value of future cash flows. If the recorded values of these assets are not recoverable, based on either the assessment screen or discounted cash flow analysis, management performs the next step, which compares the fair value of the reporting unit to the recorded value of the tangible and intangible assets of the reporting units. Goodwill is considered impaired if the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company performed a goodwill impairment test as of the first day of the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the carrying value. As a result, the Company was not required to perform the discounted cash flow analysis.
10. LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Credit Agreement
On December 18, 2014, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Loan Parties”) entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was further amended on July 20, 2015 to release all of the Company’s subsidiaries that were borrowers under or that guaranteed the Credit Agreement other than Sidney Rich Associates, Inc. and BG Retail, LLC (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”). After giving effect to the amendment, the Company is the lead borrower, and Sidney Rich Associates, Inc. and BG Retail, LLC are each co-borrowers and guarantors under the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement matures on
December 18, 2019
and provides for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to
$600.0 million
, subject to the calculated borrowing base restrictions, and provides for an increase at the Company’s option by up to
$150.0 million
from time to time during the term of the Credit Agreement, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and the consent of existing or new lenders to assume the increase. The Credit Agreement amended and restated the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated January 7, 2011 (the "Former Credit Agreement").
Borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement is limited to the lesser of the total commitments and the borrowing base ("Loan Cap"), which is based on stated percentages of the sum of eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible credit card receivables, as defined, less applicable reserves. Under the Credit Agreement, the Loan Parties’ obligations are secured by a first-priority security interest in all accounts receivable, inventory and certain other collateral.
Interest on borrowings is at variable rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or the prime rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a spread. The interest rate and fees for letters of credit vary based upon the level of excess availability under the Credit Agreement. There is an unused line fee payable on the unused portion under the facility and a letter of credit fee payable on the outstanding face amount under letters of credit.
The Credit Agreement limits the Company’s ability to create, incur, assume or permit to exist additional indebtedness and liens, make investments or specified payments, give guarantees, pay dividends, make capital expenditures and merge or acquire or sell assets. In addition, certain additional covenants would be triggered if excess availability were to fall below specified levels, including fixed charge coverage ratio requirements. Furthermore, if excess availability falls below
12.5%
of the Loan Cap for three consecutive business days or an event of default occurs, the lenders may assume dominion and control over the Company’s cash (a “cash dominion event”) until such event of default is cured or waived or the excess availability exceeds such amount for
30
consecutive days, provided that a cash dominion event shall be deemed continuing (even if an event of default is no longer continuing and/or excess availability exceeds the required amount for
30
consecutive business days) after a cash dominion event has occurred and been discontinued on two occasions in any twelve month period.
The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including, without limitation, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to other material indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, judgment defaults in excess of a certain threshold, the failure of any guaranty or security document supporting the agreement to be in full force and effect, and a change of control event. In addition, if the excess availability falls below the greater of (i)
10.0%
of the lesser of the Loan Cap and (ii)
$50.0 million
, and the fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.0 to 1.0, the Company would be in default under the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement also contains certain other covenants and restrictions. The Company was in compliance with all covenants and restrictions under the Credit Agreement as of
January 30, 2016
.
66
The maximum amount of borrowings under the Credit Agreement at the end of any month was
$28.0 million
in
2015
and
$74.0 million
in
2014
. The average daily borrowings during the year were
$3.6 million
in
2015
and
$37.6 million
in
2014
. The weighted-average interest rates approximated
3.0%
in
2015
and
2.9%
in
2014
. At
January 30, 2016
, the Company had
no
borrowings outstanding and
$6.5 million
in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement. Total additional borrowing availability was
$525.1 million
at
January 30, 2016
.
$200 Million Senior Notes Due 2019
On May 11, 2011, the Company closed on an offering (the “Offering”) of
$200.0 million
aggregate principal amount of
7.125%
Senior Notes due 2019 (the “2019 Senior Notes”). The 2019 Senior Notes were guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of its subsidiaries that was an obligor under the Credit Agreement, prior to the July 20, 2015 amendment. Interest on the 2019 Senior Notes was payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The 2019 Senior Notes were scheduled to mature on May 15, 2019 but were callable at specified redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
On July 20, 2015, the Company commenced a cash tender offer (the "Tender Offer") to purchase any and all of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of its 2019 Senior Notes. Upon expiration of the Tender Offer on July 24, 2015,
$160.7 million
aggregate principal amount of the 2019 Senior Notes were validly tendered at the redemption price of
103.950%
, representing the specified redemption price and a tender premium. On August 26, 2015, the remaining outstanding
$39.3 million
aggregate principal amount of outstanding 2019 Senior Notes were redeemed at the redemption price of
103.563%
.
$200 Million Senior Notes Due 2023
On July 27, 2015, the Company issued
$200.0 million
aggregate principal amount of
6.25%
Senior Notes due 2023 (the "2023 Senior Notes") in a private placement. On October 22, 2015, the Company commenced an offer to exchange its 2023 Senior Notes outstanding for substantially identical debt securities registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The exchange offer was completed on November 23, 2015 and did not affect the amount of the Company's indebtedness outstanding. The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2023 Senior Notes were approximately
$196.3 million
after deducting fees and expenses associated with the offering. The Company used the net proceeds, together with cash on hand, to redeem the outstanding 2019 Senior Notes.
The 2023 Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company's subsidiaries that is a borrower or guarantor under the Credit Agreement. Interest on the 2023 Senior Notes is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning on February 15, 2016. The 2023 Senior Notes will mature on
August 15, 2023
. Prior to August 15, 2018, the Company may redeem some or all of the 2023 Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2023 Senior Notes plus a "make-whole" premium (as defined in the 2023 Senior Notes indenture) and accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. After August 15, 2018, the Company may redeem all or a part of the 2023 Senior Notes at the redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest, and Additional Interest (as defined in the 2023 Senior Notes indenture), if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on August 15 of the years indicated below:
|
Year
|
Percentage
|
|
|
2018
|
104.688
|
%
|
|
2019
|
103.125
|
%
|
|
2020
|
101.563
|
%
|
|
2021 and thereafter
|
100.000
|
%
|
If the Company experiences specific kinds of changes of control, it would be required to offer to purchase the 2023 Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to
101%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and Additional Interest, if any, to, but not including, the date of repurchase.
The 2023 Senior Notes also contain certain other covenants and restrictions that limit certain activities including, among other things, levels of indebtedness, payments of dividends, the guarantee or pledge of assets, certain investments, common stock repurchases, mergers and acquisitions and sales of assets. As of January 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions relating to the 2023 Senior Notes.
Cash payments of interest for these financing arrangements during
2015
,
2014
and
2013
were
$11.9 million
,
$17.9 million
and
$18.7 million
, respectively.
67
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
During 2015 and 2014, we incurred a loss on early extinguishment of debt of
$10.7 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively, with no corresponding loss in 2013. The loss in 2015 represents the tender and call premiums, unamortized debt issuance costs, and original issue discount related to the 2019 Senior Notes. Of the
$10.7 million
loss on early extinguishment of debt recognized in 2015, approximately
$3.0 million
was non-cash. The loss in 2014 represents the early extinguishment of the Former Credit Agreement prior to maturity.
11. LEASES
The Company leases all of its retail locations and certain office locations, distribution centers and equipment. The minimum lease terms for the Company’s retail stores generally range from
five
to
10 years
. Approximately
51%
of the retail store leases are subject to renewal options for varying periods. The term of the leases for office facilities and distribution centers averages approximately
10 years
with renewal options of
five
to
20 years
.
At the time its retail facilities are initially leased, the Company often receives consideration from landlords for a portion of the cost of leasehold improvements necessary to open the store, which are recorded as a deferred rent obligation and amortized to income over the lease term as a reduction of rent expense. In addition to minimum rental payments, certain of the retail store leases require contingent payments based on sales levels. A majority of the Company’s retail operating leases contain provisions that allow it to modify amounts payable under the lease or terminate the lease in certain circumstances, such as experiencing actual sales volume below a defined threshold and/or co-tenancy provisions associated with the facility.
The following is a summary of rent expense for operating leases:
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Minimum rent
|
$
|
149,902
|
|
$
|
143,050
|
|
$
|
143,958
|
|
|||
|
Contingent rent
|
520
|
|
971
|
|
942
|
|
||||||
|
Sublease income
|
(1,223
|
)
|
(1,197
|
)
|
(1,170
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
149,199
|
|
$
|
142,824
|
|
$
|
143,730
|
|
|||
Future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases with an initial term of one year or more were as follows at
January 30, 2016
:
|
($ thousands)
|
||||
|
2016
|
$
|
159,730
|
|
|
|
2017
|
131,519
|
|
||
|
2018
|
106,567
|
|
||
|
2019
|
84,928
|
|
||
|
2020
|
69,098
|
|
||
|
Thereafter
|
205,742
|
|
||
|
Total minimum operating lease payments
|
$
|
757,584
|
|
|
12. RISK MANAGEMENT AND DERIVATIVES
General Risk Management
The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents and certain other financial instruments with various financial institutions. The financial institutions are located throughout the world and the Company’s policy is designed to limit exposure to any one institution or geographic region. The Company’s periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions are considered in the Company’s investment strategy.
The Company’s Brand Portfolio segment sells to national chains, department stores, online retailers, mass merchandisers, independent retailers and catalogs in the United States, Canada and approximately
65
other countries. Receivables arising from these sales are not collateralized. However, a portion is covered by documentary letters of credit. Credit risk is affected by conditions or occurrences within
68
the economy and the retail industry. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers and historical trends.
Derivatives
In the normal course of business, the Company’s financial results are impacted by currency rate movements in foreign-currency-denominated assets, liabilities and cash flows as it makes a portion of its purchases and sales in local currencies. The Company has established policies and business practices that are intended to mitigate a portion of the effect of these exposures. The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily forward contracts, to manage its currency exposures. These derivative financial instruments are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. Derivatives entered into by the Company are designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions.
Derivative financial instruments expose the Company to credit and market risk. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from currency exchange movements is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions being hedged. The Company does not believe there is a significant risk of loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties associated with these instruments because these transactions are executed with major international financial institutions and have varying maturities through
January 2017
. Credit risk is managed through the continuous monitoring of exposures to such counterparties.
The Company principally uses foreign currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges to offset a portion of the effects of exchange rate fluctuations. The Company’s cash flow exposures include anticipated foreign currency transactions, such as foreign currency denominated sales, costs, expenses and intercompany charges, as well as collections and payments. The Company performs a quarterly assessment of the effectiveness of the hedge relationship and measures and recognizes any hedge ineffectiveness in the consolidated statement of earnings. Hedge ineffectiveness is evaluated using the hypothetical derivative method. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness for
2015
,
2014
and
2013
was not material.
The Company’s hedging strategy uses forward contracts as cash flow hedging instruments, which are recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The effective portion of gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of these hedge instruments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified to earnings in the period that the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings.
As of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
, the Company had forward contracts maturing at various dates through
January 2017
and
January 2016
, respectively. The contract amount represents the net amount of all purchase and sale contracts of a foreign currency.
|
(U.S. $ equivalent in thousands)
|
January 30, 2016
|
|
January 31, 2015
|
|
||||
|
Financial Instruments
|
||||||||
|
U.S. dollars (purchased by the Company’s Canadian division with Canadian dollars)
|
$
|
14,118
|
|
$
|
19,633
|
|
||
|
Euro
|
15,499
|
|
16,152
|
|
||||
|
Chinese yuan
|
14,623
|
|
14,512
|
|
||||
|
Japanese yen
|
1,159
|
|
1,523
|
|
||||
|
United Arab Emirates dirham
|
930
|
|
970
|
|
||||
|
New Taiwanese dollars
|
570
|
|
599
|
|
||||
|
Other currencies
|
219
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Total financial instruments
|
$
|
47,118
|
|
$
|
53,389
|
|
||
The classification and fair values of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments included within the consolidated balance sheets as of
January 30, 2016
and
January 31, 2015
are as follows:
|
($ in thousands)
|
Asset Derivatives
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|||||||||
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
Fair Value
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards contracts:
|
|||||||||||
|
January 30, 2016
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
$
|
846
|
|
|||
|
January 31, 2015
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
$
|
1,863
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
$
|
1,784
|
|
|||
69
During
2015
and
2014
, the effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of earnings was as follows:
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts:
Income Statement Classification Gains (Losses) - Realized |
Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on Derivatives |
|
Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated OCI into Earnings |
|
Gain (loss)
Recognized in OCI on Derivatives |
|
Gain (loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated OCI into Earnings |
|
||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
57
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
1,028
|
|
(27
|
)
|
(693
|
)
|
113
|
|
||||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
(907
|
)
|
(297
|
)
|
(271
|
)
|
(64
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(17
|
)
|
—
|
|
18
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
All of the gains and losses currently included within accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income associated with the Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts are expected to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months. Additional information related to the Company’s derivative financial instruments are disclosed within Note 1 and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Hierarchy
Fair value measurement disclosure requirements specify a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (“observable inputs”) or reflect the Company’s own assumptions of market participant valuation (“unobservable inputs”). In accordance with these requirements, the hierarchy is categorized into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:
|
•
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
|
|
•
|
Level 2 – Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and
|
|
•
|
Level 3 – Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
|
In determining fair value, the Company uses valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value. Classification of the financial or non-financial asset or liability within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Measurement of Fair Value
The Company measures fair value as an exit price, the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, using the procedures described below for all financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
Money Market Funds
The Company has cash equivalents consisting of short-term money market funds backed by U.S. Treasury securities. The primary objective of these investing activities is to preserve the Company's capital for the purpose of funding operations and it does not enter into money market funds for trading or speculative purposes. The fair value is based on unadjusted quoted market prices for the funds in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency (Level 1).
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets and Liabilities
The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for the benefit of certain management employees. The investment funds offered to the participants generally correspond to the funds offered in the Company’s
70
401(k) plan, and the account balance fluctuates with the investment returns on those funds. The Deferred Compensation Plan permits the deferral of up to
50%
of base salary and
100%
of compensation received under the Company’s annual incentive plan. The deferrals are held in a separate trust, which has been established by the Company to administer the Deferred Compensation Plan. The assets of the trust are subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors in the event that the Company becomes insolvent. Consequently, the trust qualifies as a grantor trust for income tax purposes (i.e., a “Rabbi Trust”). The liabilities of the Deferred Compensation Plan are presented in other accrued expenses and the assets held by the trust are classified as trading securities within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Changes in deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities are charged to selling and administrative expenses. The fair value is based on unadjusted quoted market prices for the funds in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency (Level 1).
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan with deferred amounts valued as if invested in the Company’s common stock through the use of phantom stock units (“PSUs”). Under the plan, each participating director’s account is credited with the number of PSUs that is equal to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock which the participant could purchase or receive with the amount of the deferred compensation, based upon the average of the high and low prices of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal quarter when the cash compensation was earned. Dividend equivalents are paid on PSUs at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s common stock and are re-invested in additional PSUs at the next fiscal quarter-end. The liabilities of the plan are based on the fair value of the outstanding PSUs and are presented in other accrued expenses (current portion) or other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the PSUs are presented in selling and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statement of earnings. The fair value of each PSU is based on an unadjusted quoted market price for the Company’s common stock in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency on each measurement date (Level 1).
Restricted Stock Units for Non-Employee Directors
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, cash-equivalent restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of the Company may be granted at no cost to non-employee directors. The RSUs are subject to a vesting requirement (usually one year), earn dividend-equivalent units, and are settled in cash on the date the director terminates service or such earlier date as a director may elect, subject to restrictions, based on the then current fair value of the Company’s common stock. The fair value of each RSU is based on an unadjusted quoted market price for the Company’s common stock in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency on each measurement date (Level 1). Additional information related to restricted stock units for non-employee directors is disclosed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
Performance Share Units
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, common stock or cash may be awarded at the end of the performance period at no cost to certain officers and key employees if certain financial goals are met. Under the plan, employees are granted performance share awards at a target number of shares or units, which vest generally over a
three
-year service period. At the end of the vesting period, the employee will have earned an amount of shares or units between
0%
and
200%
of the targeted award, depending on the achievement of specified financial goals for the service period. The fair value of each performance share unit is based on an unadjusted quoted market price for the Company’s common stock in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency on each measurement date (Level 1). Additional information related to performance share units is disclosed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily foreign exchange contracts, to reduce its exposure to market risks from changes in foreign exchange rates. These foreign exchange contracts are measured at fair value using quoted forward foreign exchange prices from counterparties corroborated by market-based pricing (Level 2). Additional information related to the Company’s derivative financial instruments is disclosed in Note 1 and Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
71
Secured Convertible Note
The Company
received a secured convertible note as partial consideration for the 2014 disposition of Shoes.com, as further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The convertible note is measured at fair value using unobservable inputs (Level 3). The change in fair value during 2015 and 2014 reflects an immaterial amount of interest income.
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at January 30, 2016 and January 30, 2015. The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2015 or 2014.
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
||||||||
|
Asset (Liability)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
As of January 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents – money market funds
|
$
|
100,694
|
|
$
|
100,694
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan assets
|
3,383
|
|
3,383
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan liabilities
|
(3,383
|
)
|
(3,383
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Deferred compensation plan liabilities for non-employee directors
|
(1,728
|
)
|
(1,728
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Restricted stock units for non-employee directors
|
(8,879
|
)
|
(8,879
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Performance share units
|
(3,780
|
)
|
(3,780
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments, net
|
154
|
|
—
|
|
154
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Secured convertible note
|
7,117
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,117
|
|
||||||||
|
As of January 31, 2015:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents – money market funds
|
$
|
35,533
|
|
$
|
35,533
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan assets
|
2,904
|
|
2,904
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan liabilities
|
(2,904
|
)
|
(2,904
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Deferred compensation plan liabilities for non-employee directors
|
(2,066
|
)
|
(2,066
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Restricted stock units for non-employee directors
|
(8,857
|
)
|
(8,857
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Performance share units
|
(5,147
|
)
|
(5,147
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments, net
|
79
|
|
—
|
|
79
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Secured convertible note
|
6,957
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,957
|
|
||||||||
Impairment Charges
The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers important that could trigger an impairment review include underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, a significant change in the manner of the use of the asset or a negative industry or economic trend. When the Company determines that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the aforementioned factors, impairment is measured based on a projected discounted cash flow method. Certain factors, such as estimated store sales and expenses, used for this nonrecurring fair value measurement are considered Level 3 inputs as defined by FASB ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurement
. Long-lived assets held and used with a carrying amount of
$92.9 million
, net of impairment charges, were assessed for indicators of impairment and written down to their fair value, resulting in impairment charges included in selling and administrative expenses of
$2.8 million
in
2015
. Of the
$2.8 million
impairment charges,
$1.2 million
related to the Famous Footwear segment and
$1.6 million
related to the Brand Portfolio segment.
In
2014
, long-lived assets held and used with a carrying amount of
$87.8 million
, net of impairment charges, were assessed for indicators of impairment and written down to their fair value, resulting in impairment charges of
$2.0 million
included in selling and administrative expenses, of which
$1.0 million
related to the Famous Footwear segment and
$1.0 million
related to the Brand Portfolio segment.
In
2013
, long-lived assets held and used with a carrying amount of
$81.4 million
, net of impairment charges, were assessed for indicators of impairment and written down to their fair value, resulting in impairment charges of
$1.4 million
included in selling and administrative expenses, of which
$0.7 million
related to the Famous Footwear segment and
$0.7 million
related to the Brand Portfolio segment.
72
During the first quarter of 2013, the Company recognized an impairment charge of
$4.7 million
(
$4.7 million
after tax,
$0.11
per diluted share) related to certain supply chain and sourcing assets, which represented the excess net asset value over the estimated fair value of the assets less costs to sell. The fair value of net assets was estimated based on the anticipated sales proceeds. This was considered a Level 2 input as the assets were not sold on an active market. The impairment charge was recorded as impairment of assets held for sale in the consolidated statement of earnings and was included in the Brand Portfolio segment. These assets were sold in the second quarter of 2013 and the Company recognized an additional loss on sale of
$0.6 million
. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
During the second quarter of 2013, the Company sold ASG. In anticipation of this transaction, the assets of ASG were determined to be held for sale at May 4, 2013, and an impairment charge of
$12.6 million
was recorded in the first quarter of 2013 within the discontinued operations section of the consolidated statement of earnings. The Company recognized a gain on disposition of
$1.0 million
in the second quarter of 2013. ASG was previously included within the Brand Portfolio segment. The fair value of assets was estimated based on the anticipated sales proceeds less costs to sell. This was considered a Level 2 input as the assets were not sold on an active market. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
The Company performed its annual impairment tests of indefinite-lived intangible assets, which involves estimating the fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). As a result of its annual impairment testing, the Company did not record any impairment charges during
2015
,
2014
or 2013 related to intangible assets.
The Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill by performing a qualitative assessment at the reporting unit level during 2015. During 2014 and 2013, the Company performed a quantitative assessment which involved estimating the fair value of its reporting units using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The impairment tests, performed as of the first day of the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter of
2015
,
2014
and 2013, resulted in no impairment charges. See Note 1 and Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the goodwill impairment test.
Fair Value of the Company’s Other Financial Instruments
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents (excluding money market funds discussed above), receivables and trade accounts payable approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s other financial instruments subject to fair value disclosures are as follows:
|
|
January 30, 2016
|
January 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Carrying Value
|
|
(1)
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
(1)
|
Fair Value
|
|
||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
$
|
196,544
|
|
$
|
196,000
|
|
$
|
196,712
|
|
$
|
208,000
|
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
The carrying value of the long-term debt is net of deferred issuance costs of $3.5 million and $2.5 million as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, respectively, as a result of the adoption of ASU 2015-03, as further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
|
The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was based upon quoted prices in an inactive market as of the end of the respective periods (Level 2).
14. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Stock Repurchase Program
On August 25, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program (“2011 Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to
2.5 million
shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The Company can use the repurchase program to repurchase shares on the open market or in private transactions from time to time, depending on market conditions. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Repurchases of common stock are limited under the Company’s debt agreements. During 2015, there were
151,500
shares repurchased under the 2011 Program and during 2013 and 2014,
no
shares were repurchased under the stock repurchase program. Therefore, there were
2.3 million
shares authorized to be repurchased under the 2011 Program as of January 30, 2016.
Repurchases Related to Employee Share-based Awards
During
2015
and
2014
,
222,110
shares and
172,471
shares, respectively, were tendered by employees related to certain share-based awards. These shares were tendered in satisfaction of the exercise price of stock options and/or to satisfy minimum tax withholding amounts for
73
non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and stock performance awards. Accordingly, these share repurchases are not considered a part of the Company’s publicly announced stock repurchase programs.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
The following table sets forth the changes in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax, by component for
2015
,
2014
and
2013
:
|
($ thousands)
|
Foreign Currency Translation
|
|
Pension and Other Postretirement Transactions
(1)
|
|
Derivative Transactions
(2)
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|||||||
|
Balance at February 2, 2013
|
$
|
6,912
|
|
$
|
(5,947
|
)
|
$
|
(81
|
)
|
$
|
884
|
|
|||
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
|
(4,556
|
)
|
19,136
|
|
1,260
|
|
15,840
|
|
|||||||
|
Reclassifications:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
—
|
|
617
|
|
(670
|
)
|
(53
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Tax (benefit) provision
|
—
|
|
(224
|
)
|
229
|
|
5
|
|
|||||||
|
Net reclassifications
|
—
|
|
393
|
|
(441
|
)
|
(48
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(4,556
|
)
|
19,529
|
|
819
|
|
15,792
|
|
|||||||
|
Balance at February 1, 2014
|
$
|
2,356
|
|
$
|
13,582
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
$
|
16,676
|
|
|||
|
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
|
(3,101
|
)
|
(10,235
|
)
|
(411
|
)
|
(13,747
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Reclassifications:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
—
|
|
(204
|
)
|
(142
|
)
|
(346
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Tax provision
|
—
|
|
90
|
|
39
|
|
129
|
|
|||||||
|
Net reclassifications
|
—
|
|
(114
|
)
|
(103
|
)
|
(217
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
(3,101
|
)
|
(10,349
|
)
|
(514
|
)
|
(13,964
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Balance at January 31, 2015
|
$
|
(745
|
)
|
$
|
3,233
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
$
|
2,712
|
|
|||
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
|
(155
|
)
|
(7,559
|
)
|
74
|
|
(7,640
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Reclassifications:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
—
|
|
(1,706
|
)
|
177
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Tax provision (benefit)
|
—
|
|
676
|
|
(83
|
)
|
593
|
|
|||||||
|
Net reclassifications
|
—
|
|
(1,030
|
)
|
94
|
|
(936
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(155
|
)
|
(8,589
|
)
|
168
|
|
(8,576
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Balance at January 30, 2016
|
$
|
(900
|
)
|
$
|
(5,356
|
)
|
$
|
392
|
|
$
|
(5,864
|
)
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Amounts reclassified are included in selling and administrative expenses. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to pension and other postretirement benefits.
|
|
(2)
|
Amounts reclassified are included in net sales, costs of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses. Refer to Note 12 and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to derivative financial instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has share-based incentive compensation plans under which certain officers, employees and members of the Board of Directors are participants and may be granted stock options, restricted stock and stock performance awards.
ASC 718,
Compensation – Stock Compensation
, and ASC 505,
Equity
, require companies to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of all share-based payments granted to employees over the requisite service period for each award. In certain limited circumstances, the Company’s incentive compensation plan provides for accelerated vesting of the awards, such as in the event of a change
74
in control, qualified retirement, death or disability. The Company has a policy of issuing treasury shares in satisfaction of share-based awards.
Share-based compensation expense of
$7.5 million
,
$6.2 million
and
$5.6 million
was recognized in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively, as a component of selling and administrative expenses. The following table details the share-based compensation expense by plan and the total related income tax benefit for
2015
,
2014
and
2013
:
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Expense (income) for share-based compensation plans, net of forfeitures:
|
||||||||||||
|
Stock options
|
$
|
66
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
$
|
248
|
|
|||
|
Stock performance awards
|
1,398
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Restricted stock grants
|
6,027
|
|
6,236
|
|
5,319
|
|
||||||
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
7,491
|
|
6,190
|
|
5,567
|
|
||||||
|
Less: Income tax benefit
|
2,937
|
|
2,397
|
|
2,136
|
|
||||||
|
Total share-based compensation expense, net of income tax benefit
|
$
|
4,554
|
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
$
|
3,431
|
|
|||
In addition to the share-based compensation expense above, the Company recognized cash-based expense related to performance share units and cash awards granted under the performance share plans. In
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, the Company recognized
$5.1 million
,
$6.6 million
and
$3.7 million
, respectively, in expense for cash-based awards under the performance share plans.
The Company issued
59,682
,
373,752
and
481,916
shares of common stock in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively, for restricted stock grants, stock options exercised and stock performance awards issued to employees and common and restricted stock grants issued to directors, net of forfeitures and shares withheld to satisfy the minimum tax withholding requirement. There were no significant modifications to any share-based awards in
2015
,
2014
or
2013
.
Restricted Stock
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, restricted stock of the Company may be granted at no cost to certain officers, key employees and directors. Plan participants are entitled to cash dividends and voting rights for their respective shares. Restrictions limit the sale or transfer of these shares during the requisite service period, which generally ranges from one to
eight years. Expense for restricted stock grants is recognized on a straight-line basis separately for each vesting portion of the stock award based upon fair value of the award on the date of grant. The fair value of the restricted stock grants is the quoted market price for the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
75
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for 2015, 2014 and 2013:
|
Number of Nonvested Restricted Shares
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|||
|
Nonvested at February 2, 2013
|
2,110,325
|
|
$10.14
|
|||
|
Granted
|
411,735
|
|
17.47
|
|
||
|
Vested
|
(658,712
|
)
|
6.22
|
|
||
|
Forfeited
|
(163,250
|
)
|
12.04
|
|
||
|
Nonvested at February 1, 2014
|
1,700,098
|
|
13.25
|
|
||
|
Granted
|
281,710
|
|
28.17
|
|
||
|
Vested
|
(364,238
|
)
|
14.21
|
|
||
|
Forfeited
|
(55,100
|
)
|
15.89
|
|
||
|
Nonvested at January 31, 2015
|
1,562,470
|
|
15.61
|
|
||
|
Granted
|
318,921
|
|
30.02
|
|
||
|
Vested
|
(492,092
|
)
|
14.10
|
|
||
|
Forfeited
|
(126,850
|
)
|
18.74
|
|
||
|
Nonvested at January 30, 2016
|
1,262,449
|
|
$19.55
|
|||
The total grant date fair value of restricted stock awards vested during the years ended
January 30, 2016
,
January 31, 2015
and
February 1, 2014
, was
$6.9 million
,
$5.2 million
and
$4.1 million
, respectively. As of
January 30, 2016
, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock grants was
$11.1 million
, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of
2.6 years
.
The Company recognized excess tax benefits related to restricted stock vesting and dividends of
$2.6 million
,
$0.8 million
and
$2.9 million
in
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively, which were reflected as an increase to additional paid-in capital.
Performance Share Awards
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, common stock or cash may be awarded at the end of the performance period at no cost to certain officers and key employees if certain financial goals are met. Under the plan, employees are granted performance share awards at a target number of shares or units, which generally vest over a three-year service period. At the end of the vesting period, the employee will have earned an amount of shares between
0%
and
200%
of the targeted award, depending on the achievement of specified financial goals for the service period. If the awards are granted in units, the employee will be given an amount of cash ranging from
0%
to
200%
of the equivalent market value of the targeted award.
Expense for performance share awards is recognized based upon the fair value of the awards on the date of grant and the anticipated number of shares or cash to be awarded on a straight-line basis for each vesting portion of the share award. The fair value of the performance share awards is the unadjusted quoted market price for the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
76
The following table summarizes performance share activity for 2015, 2014 and 2013:
|
Number of
Performance Share Awards at Target Level |
|
Number of
Nonvested Performance Share Awards at Maximum Level |
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
||||
|
Nonvested at February 2, 2013
|
222,325
|
|
382,525
|
|
$12.67
|
||||
|
Granted (award of units payable in cash)
|
70,225
|
|
140,450
|
|
17.00
|
|
|||
|
Vested
|
(117,250
|
)
|
(175,875
|
)
|
15.20
|
|
|||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Forfeited
|
(10,775
|
)
|
(18,050
|
)
|
13.09
|
|
|||
|
Nonvested at February 1, 2014
|
164,525
|
|
329,050
|
|
12.69
|
|
|||
|
Granted (award of units payable in cash)
|
88,185
|
|
176,370
|
|
28.18
|
|
|||
|
Vested
|
(84,275
|
)
|
(168,550
|
)
|
9.27
|
|
|||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Forfeited
|
(19,900
|
)
|
(39,800
|
)
|
15.96
|
|
|||
|
Nonvested at January 31, 2015
|
148,535
|
|
297,070
|
|
23.39
|
|
|||
|
Granted (award payable in shares)
|
177,921
|
|
355,842
|
|
30.12
|
||||
|
Vested
|
(15,182
|
)
|
(30,364
|
)
|
24.71
|
||||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Forfeited
|
(3,750
|
)
|
(7,500
|
)
|
29.47
|
||||
|
Nonvested at January 30, 2016
|
307,524
|
|
615,048
|
|
$27.14
|
||||
As of
January 30, 2016
, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested performance share awards was
$11.3 million
, which will be recognized over the weighted-average remaining service period of
1.6 years
.
Stock Options
Stock options are granted to employees at exercise prices equal to the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. Stock options generally vest over
four years
and have a term of
10 years
. Compensation cost for all stock options is recognized over the requisite service period for each award. No dividends are paid on unexercised options. Expense for stock options is recognized on a straight-line basis separately for each vesting portion of the stock option award.
The Company granted
16,667
,
zero
and
4,000
stock options during
2015
,
2014
and
2013
respectively. Fair values of options granted were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following assumptions:
|
2015
|
|
2013
|
|
|||||
|
Dividend yield
|
1.0
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
||||
|
Expected volatility
|
45.5
|
%
|
67.7
|
%
|
||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.8
|
%
|
1.3
|
%
|
||||
|
Expected term (in years)
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
||||
Dividend yields are based on historical dividend yields. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock at the time of grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant for periods corresponding with the expected term of the options. The expected term of options represents the weighted-average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, giving consideration to vesting schedules and the Company’s historical exercise patterns.
77
Summarized information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at
January 30, 2016
is as follows:
|
Outstanding
|
Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||
|
Exercise Price Range
|
Number of
Options |
|
Weighted-
Average Remaining Life (Years) |
Weighted-
Average Exercise Price |
Number of
Options |
|
Weighted-
Average Remaining Life (Years) |
Weighted-
Average Exercise Price |
||||||
|
$3.33 - $11.54
|
71,625
|
|
4.2
|
$6.36
|
54,625
|
|
4.5
|
$7.09
|
||||||
|
$11.55 - $14.45
|
61,000
|
|
4.1
|
13.99
|
61,000
|
|
4.1
|
13.99
|
||||||
|
$14.46 - $15.35
|
20,750
|
|
3.9
|
15.20
|
20,750
|
|
3.9
|
15.20
|
||||||
|
$15.36 - $22.44
|
63,006
|
|
0.5
|
20.96
|
63,006
|
|
0.5
|
20.96
|
||||||
|
$22.45 - $35.25
|
84,914
|
|
2.5
|
32.50
|
68,247
|
|
1.0
|
33.31
|
||||||
|
|
301,295
|
|
2.9
|
$18.93
|
267,628
|
|
2.5
|
$19.24
|
||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and currently exercisable at
January 30, 2016
was
$2.9 million
and
$2.5 million
, respectively. Intrinsic value for stock options is calculated based on the exercise price of the underlying awards as compared to the quoted price of the Company’s common stock as of the reporting date.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for
2015
under the current and prior plans:
|
|
Number of
Options |
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price |
|
||
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2015
|
416,803
|
|
$17.75
|
|||
|
Granted
|
16,667
|
|
29.18
|
|
||
|
Exercised
|
(88,224
|
)
|
15.58
|
|||
|
Forfeited
|
(7,500
|
)
|
35.25
|
|||
|
Canceled or expired
|
(36,451
|
)
|
14.91
|
|
||
|
Outstanding at January 30, 2016
|
301,295
|
|
$18.93
|
|||
|
Exercisable at January 30, 2016
|
267,628
|
|
$19.24
|
|||
The intrinsic value of stock options exercised was
$1.3 million
,
$3.8 million
and
$4.0 million
for
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively. The amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was
$0.4 million
in
2015
,
$3.2 million
in
2014
and
$4.9 million
in
2013
. In addition,
32,139
,
60,624
and
91,157
shares were tendered by employees in satisfaction of the exercise price of stock options during
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, respectively.
The Company recognized excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises of
$0.1 million
in
2015
and
2014
and
$0.5 million
in 2013 which were reflected as an increase to additional paid-in capital.
The following table summarizes nonvested stock option activity for
2015
under the current and prior plans:
|
Number of
Nonvested Options |
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
||||
|
Nonvested at January 31, 2015
|
36,625
|
|
$
|
3.28
|
|
||
|
Granted
|
16,667
|
|
12.81
|
|
|||
|
Vested
|
(19,625
|
)
|
4.72
|
|
|||
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Nonvested at January 30, 2016
|
33,667
|
|
$
|
7.16
|
|
||
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted for
2015
,
2014
and
2013
was
$12.81
,
$0
and
$9.46
, respectively. The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during
2015
,
2014
and
2013
was
$0.1 million
,
$0.3 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively. As of
January 30, 2016
, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options was
$0.1 million
, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of
3.5 years
.
78
Restricted Stock Units for Non-Employee Directors
Equity-based grants may be made to non-employee directors in the form of cash-equivalent restricted stock units (“RSUs”) at no cost to the non-employee director. The RSUs are subject to a vesting requirement (usually one year), earn dividend equivalent units and are payable in cash on the date the director terminates service or such earlier date as a director may elect, subject to restrictions, based on the then current fair value of the Company’s common stock. Dividend equivalents are paid on outstanding RSUs at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s common stock, are automatically re-invested in additional RSUs and vest immediately as of the payment date for the dividend. Expense related to the initial grant of RSUs is recognized ratably over the vesting period based upon the fair value of the RSUs, as remeasured at the end of each period. Expense for the dividend equivalents is recognized at fair value immediately. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the RSUs subsequent to the vesting period and through the settlement date are reported in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings. Refer to Note 5 and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding the deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors.
The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity for the year ended
January 30, 2016
:
|
Outstanding
|
Accrued
(1)
|
Nonvested RSUs
|
|||||||||||||
|
Number of
Vested RSUs |
|
Number of
Nonvested RSUs |
|
Total Number
of RSUs |
|
Total Number
of RSUs |
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||
|
January 31, 2015
|
292,294
|
|
38,700
|
|
330,994
|
|
318,094
|
|
$28.72
|
||||||
|
Granted
(2)
|
2,800
|
|
36,341
|
|
39,141
|
|
27,141
|
|
31.65
|
||||||
|
Vested
|
39,041
|
|
(39,041
|
)
|
—
|
|
12,900
|
|
28.73
|
||||||
|
Settled
|
(21,698
|
)
|
—
|
|
(21,698
|
)
|
(21,698
|
)
|
31.41
|
||||||
|
January 30, 2016
|
312,437
|
|
36,000
|
|
348,437
|
|
336,437
|
|
$31.67
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
Accrued RSUs include all fully vested awards and a pro-rata portion of nonvested awards based on the elapsed portion of the vesting period.
|
||||||||||||||
|
(2)
|
Granted RSUs include 3,141 RSUs resulting from dividend equivalents paid on outstanding RSUs, of which 2,800 related to outstanding vested RSUs and 341 to outstanding nonvested RSUs.
|
||||||||||||||
Information about RSUs granted, vested and settled during
2015
,
2014
and
2013
is as follows:
|
($ thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|||||||
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs granted
(1)
|
$
|
31.54
|
|
$
|
28.69
|
|
$
|
21.33
|
|
||||
|
Fair value of RSUs vested
|
1,049
|
|
1,558
|
|
1,600
|
|
|||||||
|
RSUs settled
|
21,698
|
|
57,260
|
|
9,905
|
|
|||||||
|
(1)
|
Includes dividend equivalents granted on outstanding RSUs, which vest immediately.
|
||||||||||||
The following table details the RSU compensation expense and the related income tax benefit for
2015
,
2014
and
2013
:
|
($ thousands)
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
||||||
|
Compensation expense
|
$
|
704
|
|
$
|
2,707
|
|
$
|
3,258
|
|
|||
|
Income tax benefit
|
(276
|
)
|
(1,053
|
)
|
(1,267
|
)
|
||||||
|
Compensation expense, net of income tax benefit
|
$
|
428
|
|
$
|
1,654
|
|
$
|
1,991
|
|
|||
The aggregate intrinsic value of RSUs outstanding and currently vested at
January 30, 2016
is
$9.4 million
and
$8.4 million
, respectively. Aggregate intrinsic value for RSUs is calculated based on the average of the high and low prices of the Company’s common stock as of the reporting date. The liabilities associated with the accrued RSUs totaled
$8.9 million
as of both January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015.
16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
C. banner International Holdings Limited
The Company has a joint venture agreement with a subsidiary of C. banner International Holdings Limited (“CBI”) to market Naturalizer footwear in China, effective through August 2017. The Company is a
51%
owner of the joint venture (“B&H Footwear”), with CBI owning
79
the other
49%
. During 2013, B&H Footwear transferred the operation of its retail stores in China to CBI. B&H Footwear continues to sell Naturalizer footwear to a retail affiliate of CBI on a wholesale basis, which in turn sells the Naturalizer products through department store shops and free-standing stores in China. During
2015
,
2014
and
2013
, the Company, through its consolidated subsidiary, B&H Footwear, sold
$8.4 million
,
$8.6 million
, and
$8.3 million
, respectively, of Naturalizer footwear on a wholesale basis to CBI.
17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Remediation
Prior operations included numerous manufacturing and other facilities for which the Company may have responsibility under various environmental laws for the remediation of conditions that may be identified in the future. The Company is involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites and has been notified that it is or may be a potentially responsible party at several other sites.
Redfield
The Company is remediating, under the oversight of Colorado authorities, the groundwater and indoor air at its owned facility in Colorado (the “Redfield site” or, when referring to remediation activities at or under the facility, the “on-site remediation”) and residential neighborhoods adjacent to and near the property (the “off-site remediation”) that have been affected by solvents previously used at the facility. The on-site remediation calls for the operation of a pump and treat system (which prevents migration of contaminated groundwater off the property) as the final remedy for the site, subject to monitoring and periodic review of the on-site conditions and other remedial technologies that may be developed in the future. Off-site groundwater concentrations have been reducing over time since installation of the pump and treat system in 2000 and injection of clean water beginning in 2003. However, localized areas of contaminated bedrock just beyond the property line continue to impact off-site groundwater. The modified workplan for addressing this condition includes converting the off-site bioremediation system into a monitoring well network and employing different remediation methods in these recalcitrant areas. In accordance with the workplan, a pilot test was conducted of certain groundwater remediation methods and the results of that test were used to develop more detailed plans for remedial activities in the off-site areas, which were approved by the authorities and are being implemented in a phased manner. The results of groundwater monitoring are being used to evaluate the effectiveness of these activities. In 2014, the Company submitted a proposed expanded remedy workplan ("Expanded Remedy Workplan") that was accepted by the oversight authorities during 2015. The Company is implementing the Expanded Remedy Workplan and will continue these efforts in 2016.
The cumulative expenditures for both on-site and off-site remediation through
January 30, 2016
were
$27.9 million
. The Company has recovered a portion of these expenditures from insurers and other third parties. The reserve for the anticipated future remediation activities at
January 30, 2016
is
$9.8 million
, of which
$9.0 million
is recorded within other liabilities and
$0.8 million
is recorded within other accrued expenses. Of the total
$9.8 million
reserve,
$5.0 million
is for on-site remediation and
$4.8 million
is for off-site remediation. The liability for the on-site remediation was discounted at
4.8%
. On an undiscounted basis, the on-site remediation liability would be
$15.2
million as of
January 30, 2016
. The Company expects to spend approximately
$0.2 million
in each of the next five years and
$14.2 million
in the aggregate thereafter related to the on-site remediation.
Other
The Company has completed its remediation efforts at its closed New York tannery and
two
associated landfills. In 1995, state environmental authorities reclassified the status of these sites as being properly closed and requiring only continued maintenance and monitoring through 2024. The Company has an accrued liability of
$1.3 million
at
January 30, 2016
related to these sites, which has been discounted at
6.4%
. Of the
$1.3 million
reserve,
$1.1 million
is recorded in other liabilities and
$0.2 million
is recorded in other accrued expenses. On an undiscounted basis, this liability would be
$1.6 million
. The Company expects to spend approximately
$0.2 million
in each of the next five years and
$0.6 million
in the aggregate thereafter related to these sites. In addition, various federal and state authorities have identified the Company as a potentially responsible party for remediation at certain other sites. However, the Company does not currently believe that its liability for such sites, if any, would be material.
The Company continues to evaluate its estimated costs in conjunction with its environmental consultants and records its best estimate of such liabilities. However, future actions and the associated costs are subject to oversight and approval of various governmental authorities. Accordingly, the ultimate costs may vary, and it is possible costs may exceed the recorded amounts.
Litigation
The Company is involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such ordinary course of business proceedings and litigation currently pending is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. Legal costs associated with litigation are generally expensed as incurred.
80
During 2014, the Company signed a settlement agreement to resolve a putative class action lawsuit involving wage and hour claims in California for an amount not to exceed
$1.5 million
. In 2015, the court granted final approval of the settlement, pursuant to which the Company was required to pay
$1.0 million
in attorneys' fees, costs of administering the settlement and settlement payments to class members who submitted claims. All payments required under the settlement agreement were made in the fourth quarter of 2015 and this matter is fully resolved.
18. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
The Company's 2023 Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by all of its existing and future subsidiaries that are guarantors under the Credit Agreement, as further discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. The following table presents the condensed consolidating financial information for each of Caleres, Inc. (“Parent”), the Guarantors, and subsidiaries of the Parent that are not Guarantors (the “Non-Guarantors”), together with consolidating eliminations, as of and for the periods indicated. Guarantors are
100%
owned by the Parent.
The condensed consolidating financial statements have been prepared using the equity method of accounting in accordance with the requirements for presentation of such information. Management believes that the information, presented in lieu of complete financial statements for each of the Guarantors, provides meaningful information to allow investors to determine the nature of the assets held by, and operations and cash flows of, each of the consolidated groups.
81
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
AS OF JANUARY 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Non-Guarantors
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
31,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
87,151
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
118,151
|
|
||||
|
Receivables, net
|
110,235
|
|
2,290
|
|
41,139
|
|
—
|
|
153,664
|
|
|||||||||
|
Inventories, net
|
151,704
|
|
371,538
|
|
23,503
|
|
—
|
|
546,745
|
|
|||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
29,765
|
|
24,597
|
|
8,109
|
|
(5,966
|
)
|
56,505
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany receivable - current
|
650
|
|
176
|
|
6,877
|
|
(7,703
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total current assets
|
323,354
|
|
398,601
|
|
166,779
|
|
(13,669
|
)
|
875,065
|
|
|||||||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
32,538
|
|
136,223
|
|
10,249
|
|
—
|
|
179,010
|
|
|||||||||
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
115,558
|
|
2,800
|
|
12,541
|
|
—
|
|
130,899
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other assets
|
94,767
|
|
15,772
|
|
7,810
|
|
—
|
|
118,349
|
|
|||||||||
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
1,028,143
|
|
—
|
|
(19,524
|
)
|
(1,008,619
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany receivable - noncurrent
|
431,523
|
|
354,038
|
|
556,259
|
|
(1,341,820
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
2,025,883
|
|
$
|
907,434
|
|
$
|
734,114
|
|
$
|
(2,364,108
|
)
|
$
|
1,303,323
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities and Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Trade accounts payable
|
$
|
78,332
|
|
$
|
123,274
|
|
$
|
36,196
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
237,802
|
|
||||
|
Other accrued expenses
|
80,053
|
|
62,729
|
|
15,681
|
|
(5,966
|
)
|
152,497
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany payable - current
|
4,394
|
|
—
|
|
3,309
|
|
(7,703
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
162,779
|
|
186,003
|
|
55,186
|
|
(13,669
|
)
|
390,299
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
196,544
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
196,544
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
44,011
|
|
66,302
|
|
3,695
|
|
—
|
|
114,008
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany payable - noncurrent
|
1,021,065
|
|
39,175
|
|
281,580
|
|
(1,341,820
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total other liabilities
|
1,261,620
|
|
105,477
|
|
285,275
|
|
(1,341,820
|
)
|
310,552
|
|
|||||||||
|
Equity:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity
|
601,484
|
|
615,954
|
|
392,665
|
|
(1,008,619
|
)
|
601,484
|
|
|||||||||
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
988
|
|
—
|
|
988
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total equity
|
601,484
|
|
615,954
|
|
393,653
|
|
(1,008,619
|
)
|
602,472
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
$
|
2,025,883
|
|
$
|
907,434
|
|
$
|
734,114
|
|
$
|
(2,364,108
|
)
|
$
|
1,303,323
|
|
||||
82
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 30, 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Non-Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
819,148
|
|
$
|
1,652,444
|
|
$
|
268,779
|
|
$
|
(162,941
|
)
|
$
|
2,577,430
|
|
||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
591,539
|
|
905,412
|
|
162,384
|
|
(129,708
|
)
|
1,529,627
|
|
|||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
227,609
|
|
747,032
|
|
106,395
|
|
(33,233
|
)
|
1,047,803
|
|
|||||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
235,210
|
|
649,020
|
|
61,699
|
|
(33,233
|
)
|
912,696
|
|
|||||||||
|
Operating (loss) earnings
|
(7,601
|
)
|
98,012
|
|
44,696
|
|
—
|
|
135,107
|
|
|||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(16,588
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16,589
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(10,651
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(10,651
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Interest income
|
695
|
|
—
|
|
204
|
|
—
|
|
899
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany interest income (expense)
|
14,363
|
|
(14,581
|
)
|
218
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
(Loss) earnings before income taxes
|
(19,782
|
)
|
83,430
|
|
45,118
|
|
—
|
|
108,766
|
|
|||||||||
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
8,755
|
|
(29,475
|
)
|
(6,222
|
)
|
—
|
|
(26,942
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries, net of tax
|
92,506
|
|
—
|
|
(616
|
)
|
(91,890
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
81,479
|
|
53,955
|
|
38,280
|
|
(91,890
|
)
|
81,824
|
|
|||||||||
|
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
345
|
|
—
|
|
345
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
81,479
|
|
$
|
53,955
|
|
$
|
37,935
|
|
$
|
(91,890
|
)
|
$
|
81,479
|
|
||||
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 30, 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-Guarantors
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
81,479
|
|
$
|
53,955
|
|
$
|
38,280
|
|
$
|
(91,890
|
)
|
$
|
81,824
|
|
||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(224
|
)
|
—
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments
|
(8,838
|
)
|
—
|
|
249
|
|
—
|
|
(8,589
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
628
|
|
—
|
|
(460
|
)
|
—
|
|
168
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss from investment in subsidiaries
|
(366
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
366
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
(8,576
|
)
|
—
|
|
(435
|
)
|
366
|
|
(8,645
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
72,903
|
|
53,955
|
|
37,845
|
|
(91,524
|
)
|
73,179
|
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
276
|
|
—
|
|
276
|
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
72,903
|
|
$
|
53,955
|
|
$
|
37,569
|
|
$
|
(91,524
|
)
|
$
|
72,903
|
|
||||
83
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 30, 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-Guarantors
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities
|
$
|
(1,259
|
)
|
$
|
99,222
|
|
$
|
51,189
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
149,152
|
|
|||||
|
Investing activities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(14,585
|
)
|
(56,382
|
)
|
(2,512
|
)
|
—
|
|
(73,479
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
|
7,111
|
|
—
|
|
322
|
|
—
|
|
7,433
|
|
|||||||||
|
Capitalized software
|
(5,197
|
)
|
(2,538
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(7,735
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany investing
|
(568
|
)
|
568
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
(13,239
|
)
|
(58,352
|
)
|
(2,190
|
)
|
—
|
|
(73,781
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Financing activities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement
|
198,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
198,000
|
|
|||||||||
|
Repayments under revolving credit agreement
|
(198,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(198,000
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of 2023 senior notes
|
200,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
200,000
|
|
|||||||||
|
Redemption of 2019 senior notes
|
(200,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(200,000
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
(12,253
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(12,253
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Debt issuance costs
|
(3,650
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
(4,921
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4,921
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock under share-based plans, net
|
(5,297
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(5,297
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based plans
|
2,651
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,651
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany financing
|
55,077
|
|
(40,870
|
)
|
(14,207
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
31,607
|
|
(40,870
|
)
|
(14,207
|
)
|
—
|
|
(23,470
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,153
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,153
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
17,109
|
|
—
|
|
33,639
|
|
—
|
|
50,748
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
13,891
|
|
—
|
|
53,512
|
|
—
|
|
67,403
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
31,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
87,151
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
118,151
|
|
||||
84
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
AS OF JANUARY 31, 2015
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Non- Guarantors
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
13,891
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
53,512
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
67,403
|
|
||||
|
Receivables, net
|
89,030
|
|
5,398
|
|
42,218
|
|
—
|
|
136,646
|
|
|||||||||
|
Inventories, net
|
148,082
|
|
376,254
|
|
18,767
|
|
—
|
|
543,103
|
|
|||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
40,746
|
|
20,777
|
|
8,964
|
|
(27,491
|
)
|
42,996
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany receivable - current
|
1,194
|
|
—
|
|
8,750
|
|
(9,944
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total current assets
|
292,943
|
|
402,429
|
|
132,211
|
|
(37,435
|
)
|
790,148
|
|
|||||||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
29,237
|
|
109,720
|
|
10,786
|
|
—
|
|
149,743
|
|
|||||||||
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
117,792
|
|
2,800
|
|
13,995
|
|
—
|
|
134,587
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other assets
|
112,185
|
|
13,733
|
|
13,931
|
|
—
|
|
139,849
|
|
|||||||||
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
956,831
|
|
—
|
|
(18,909
|
)
|
(937,922
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany receivable - noncurrent
|
459,774
|
|
306,871
|
|
539,396
|
|
(1,306,041
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,968,762
|
|
$
|
835,553
|
|
$
|
691,410
|
|
$
|
(2,281,398
|
)
|
$
|
1,214,327
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities and Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Trade accounts payable
|
$
|
60,377
|
|
$
|
114,208
|
|
$
|
41,336
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
215,921
|
|
||||
|
Other accrued expenses
|
83,170
|
|
85,638
|
|
12,301
|
|
(27,491
|
)
|
153,618
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany payable - current
|
4,948
|
|
—
|
|
4,996
|
|
(9,944
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
148,495
|
|
199,846
|
|
58,633
|
|
(37,435
|
)
|
369,539
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
196,712
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
196,712
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
69,391
|
|
32,574
|
|
4,489
|
|
—
|
|
106,454
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany payable - noncurrent
|
1,013,254
|
|
21,078
|
|
271,709
|
|
(1,306,041
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total other liabilities
|
1,279,357
|
|
53,652
|
|
276,198
|
|
(1,306,041
|
)
|
303,166
|
|
|||||||||
|
Equity:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity
|
540,910
|
|
582,055
|
|
355,867
|
|
(937,922
|
)
|
540,910
|
|
|||||||||
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
712
|
|
—
|
|
712
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total equity
|
540,910
|
|
582,055
|
|
356,579
|
|
(937,922
|
)
|
541,622
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
$
|
1,968,762
|
|
$
|
835,553
|
|
$
|
691,410
|
|
$
|
(2,281,398
|
)
|
$
|
1,214,327
|
|
||||
85
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-Guarantors
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
788,708
|
|
$
|
1,634,375
|
|
$
|
329,765
|
|
$
|
(181,139
|
)
|
$
|
2,571,709
|
|
||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
570,343
|
|
899,968
|
|
213,716
|
|
(152,418
|
)
|
1,531,609
|
|
|||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
218,365
|
|
734,407
|
|
116,049
|
|
(28,721
|
)
|
1,040,100
|
|
|||||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
231,141
|
|
633,073
|
|
75,189
|
|
(28,721
|
)
|
910,682
|
|
|||||||||
|
Restructuring and other special charges, net
|
3,484
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,484
|
|
|||||||||
|
Operating (loss) earnings
|
(16,260
|
)
|
101,334
|
|
40,860
|
|
—
|
|
125,934
|
|
|||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(20,444
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(20,445
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(420
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(420
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Interest income
|
31
|
|
—
|
|
348
|
|
—
|
|
379
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany interest income (expense)
|
12,115
|
|
(12,826
|
)
|
711
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Gain on sale of subsidiary
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,679
|
|
—
|
|
4,679
|
|
|||||||||
|
(Loss) earnings before income taxes
|
(24,978
|
)
|
88,507
|
|
46,598
|
|
—
|
|
110,127
|
|
|||||||||
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
10,599
|
|
(34,710
|
)
|
(3,073
|
)
|
—
|
|
(27,184
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax
|
97,229
|
|
—
|
|
37
|
|
(97,266
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
82,850
|
|
53,797
|
|
43,562
|
|
(97,266
|
)
|
82,943
|
|
|||||||||
|
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
93
|
|
—
|
|
93
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
82,850
|
|
$
|
53,797
|
|
$
|
43,469
|
|
$
|
(97,266
|
)
|
$
|
82,850
|
|
||||
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-Guarantors
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
82,850
|
|
$
|
53,797
|
|
$
|
43,562
|
|
$
|
(97,266
|
)
|
$
|
82,943
|
|
||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3,145
|
)
|
—
|
|
(3,145
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments
|
(10,003
|
)
|
—
|
|
(346
|
)
|
—
|
|
(10,349
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
(1,250
|
)
|
—
|
|
736
|
|
—
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss from investment in subsidiaries
|
(2,711
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,711
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
(13,964
|
)
|
—
|
|
(2,755
|
)
|
2,711
|
|
(14,008
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
68,886
|
|
53,797
|
|
40,807
|
|
(94,555
|
)
|
68,935
|
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
49
|
|
—
|
|
49
|
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
68,886
|
|
$
|
53,797
|
|
$
|
40,758
|
|
$
|
(94,555
|
)
|
$
|
68,886
|
|
||||
86
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-Guarantors
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities
|
$
|
(11,728
|
)
|
$
|
99,709
|
|
$
|
30,831
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
118,812
|
|
||||
|
Investing activities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(7,129
|
)
|
(33,067
|
)
|
(4,756
|
)
|
—
|
|
(44,952
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Capitalized software
|
(4,834
|
)
|
(194
|
)
|
(58
|
)
|
—
|
|
(5,086
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Acquisition of trademarks
|
(65,065
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(65,065
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliate
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Net proceeds from sale of subsidiaries, inclusive of note receivable
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,120
|
|
—
|
|
10,120
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany investing
|
(2,314
|
)
|
(124
|
)
|
2,438
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities
|
(79,342
|
)
|
(33,385
|
)
|
744
|
|
—
|
|
(111,983
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Financing activities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement
|
867,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
867,000
|
|
|||||||||
|
Repayments under revolving credit agreement
|
(874,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(874,000
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
(12,237
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(12,237
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Debt issuance costs
|
(2,618
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2,618
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock under share-based plans, net
|
443
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
443
|
|
|||||||||
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based plans
|
929
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
929
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany financing
|
125,444
|
|
(66,324
|
)
|
(59,120
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
104,961
|
|
(66,324
|
)
|
(59,120
|
)
|
—
|
|
(20,483
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,489
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,489
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
13,891
|
|
—
|
|
(29,034
|
)
|
—
|
|
(15,143
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
82,546
|
|
—
|
|
82,546
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
13,891
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
53,512
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
67,403
|
|
||||
87
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2014
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Non-Guarantors
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
733,996
|
|
$
|
1,631,755
|
|
$
|
361,277
|
|
$
|
(213,915
|
)
|
$
|
2,513,113
|
|
||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
549,281
|
|
900,043
|
|
236,113
|
|
(186,612
|
)
|
1,498,825
|
|
|||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
184,715
|
|
731,712
|
|
125,164
|
|
(27,303
|
)
|
1,014,288
|
|
|||||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
217,902
|
|
629,405
|
|
89,745
|
|
(27,303
|
)
|
909,749
|
|
|||||||||
|
Restructuring and other special charges, net
|
686
|
|
—
|
|
576
|
|
—
|
|
1,262
|
|
|||||||||
|
Impairment of assets held for sale
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,660
|
|
—
|
|
4,660
|
|
|||||||||
|
Operating (loss) earnings
|
(33,873
|
)
|
102,307
|
|
30,183
|
|
—
|
|
98,617
|
|
|||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(21,163
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
(90
|
)
|
—
|
|
(21,254
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Interest income
|
23
|
|
—
|
|
354
|
|
—
|
|
377
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany interest income (expense)
|
13,414
|
|
(13,060
|
)
|
(354
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
(Loss) earnings before income taxes from continuing operations
|
(41,599
|
)
|
89,246
|
|
30,093
|
|
—
|
|
77,740
|
|
|||||||||
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
20,427
|
|
(35,727
|
)
|
(8,458
|
)
|
—
|
|
(23,758
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Equity in earnings (loss) from continuing operations of subsidiaries, net of tax
|
75,331
|
|
—
|
|
(168
|
)
|
(75,163
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net earnings from continuing operations
|
54,159
|
|
53,519
|
|
21,467
|
|
(75,163
|
)
|
53,982
|
|
|||||||||
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(5,296
|
)
|
—
|
|
722
|
|
—
|
|
(4,574
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Disposition/impairment of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(11,512
|
)
|
—
|
|
(11,512
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Equity in loss from discontinued operations of subsidiaries, net of tax
|
(10,790
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,790
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
(16,086
|
)
|
—
|
|
(10,790
|
)
|
10,790
|
|
(16,086
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
38,073
|
|
53,519
|
|
10,677
|
|
(64,373
|
)
|
37,896
|
|
|||||||||
|
Plus: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(177
|
)
|
—
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
38,073
|
|
$
|
53,519
|
|
$
|
10,854
|
|
$
|
(64,373
|
)
|
$
|
38,073
|
|
||||
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2014
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Non-Guarantors
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
38,073
|
|
$
|
53,519
|
|
$
|
10,677
|
|
$
|
(64,373
|
)
|
$
|
37,896
|
|
||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4,538
|
)
|
—
|
|
(4,538
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments
|
19,114
|
|
—
|
|
415
|
|
—
|
|
19,529
|
|
|||||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
(55
|
)
|
—
|
|
874
|
|
—
|
|
819
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss from investment in subsidiaries
|
(3,317
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,317
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
15,742
|
|
—
|
|
(3,249
|
)
|
3,317
|
|
15,810
|
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
53,815
|
|
53,519
|
|
7,428
|
|
(61,056
|
)
|
53,706
|
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(109
|
)
|
—
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
$
|
53,815
|
|
$
|
53,519
|
|
$
|
7,537
|
|
$
|
(61,056
|
)
|
$
|
53,815
|
|
||||
88
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2014
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-Guarantors
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
Parent
|
Guarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
|
$
|
60,886
|
|
$
|
62,603
|
|
$
|
(19,457
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
104,032
|
|
||||
|
Investing activities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(5,595
|
)
|
(34,606
|
)
|
(3,767
|
)
|
—
|
|
(43,968
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Capitalized software
|
(4,920
|
)
|
(193
|
)
|
(122
|
)
|
—
|
|
(5,235
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Net proceeds from sale of subsidiaries
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
69,347
|
|
—
|
|
69,347
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany investing
|
(1,128
|
)
|
(247
|
)
|
1,375
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities
|
(11,643
|
)
|
(35,046
|
)
|
66,833
|
|
—
|
|
20,144
|
|
|||||||||
|
Financing activities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement
|
1,129,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,129,000
|
|
|||||||||
|
Repayments under revolving credit agreement
|
(1,227,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,227,000
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Dividend paid
|
(12,105
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(12,105
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock under share-based plans, net
|
804
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
804
|
|
|||||||||
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based plans
|
3,439
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,439
|
|
|||||||||
|
Contributions by noncontrolling interest
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
50
|
|
—
|
|
50
|
|
|||||||||
|
Intercompany financing
|
56,619
|
|
(27,557
|
)
|
(29,062
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net cash used for by financing activities
|
(49,243
|
)
|
(27,557
|
)
|
(29,012
|
)
|
—
|
|
(105,812
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4,041
|
)
|
—
|
|
(4,041
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
14,323
|
|
—
|
|
14,323
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
68,223
|
|
—
|
|
68,223
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
82,546
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
82,546
|
|
||||
89
19. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)
Quarterly financial results (unaudited) for
2015
and
2014
are as follows:
|
Quarters
|
|||||||||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
||||||||
|
($ thousands, except per share amounts)
|
(13 weeks)
|
|
(13 weeks)
|
|
(13 weeks)
|
|
(13 Weeks)
|
|
|||||||
|
2015
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
602,283
|
|
$
|
637,834
|
|
$
|
728,639
|
|
$
|
608,674
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
248,526
|
|
262,795
|
|
288,434
|
|
248,048
|
|
|||||||
|
Net earnings
|
19,391
|
|
16,863
|
|
33,992
|
|
11,578
|
|
|||||||
|
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
19,261
|
|
16,825
|
|
33,983
|
|
11,410
|
|
|||||||
|
Per share of common stock:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
(1)
|
0.44
|
|
0.38
|
|
0.78
|
|
0.26
|
|
|||||||
|
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
(1)
|
0.44
|
|
0.38
|
|
0.78
|
|
0.26
|
|
|||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
0.07
|
|
0.07
|
|
0.07
|
|
0.07
|
|
|||||||
|
Market value:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
High
|
33.33
|
|
33.83
|
|
33.73
|
|
31.75
|
|
|||||||
|
Low
|
27.22
|
|
28.91
|
|
27.90
|
|
23.22
|
|
|||||||
(1) EPS for the quarters may not sum to the annual amount as each period is computed on a discrete period basis.
|
Quarters
|
|||||||||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
||||||||
|
($ thousands, except per share amounts)
|
(13 weeks)
|
|
(13 weeks)
|
|
(13 weeks)
|
|
(13 Weeks)
|
|
|||||||
|
2014
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
591,162
|
|
$
|
635,877
|
|
$
|
729,277
|
|
$
|
615,393
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
242,341
|
|
259,642
|
|
290,730
|
|
247,387
|
|
|||||||
|
Net earnings
|
15,476
|
|
18,039
|
|
33,237
|
|
16,191
|
|
|||||||
|
Net earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
|
15,429
|
|
18,064
|
|
33,113
|
|
16,244
|
|
|||||||
|
Per share of common stock:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
(1)
|
0.35
|
|
0.41
|
|
0.76
|
|
0.37
|
|
|||||||
|
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
(1)
|
0.35
|
|
0.41
|
|
0.75
|
|
0.37
|
|
|||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
0.07
|
|
0.07
|
|
0.07
|
|
0.07
|
|
|||||||
|
Market value:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
High
|
28.73
|
|
29.65
|
|
32.31
|
|
33.67
|
|
|||||||
|
Low
|
22.30
|
|
23.14
|
|
25.30
|
|
26.39
|
|
|||||||
(1) EPS for the quarters may not sum to the annual amount as each period is computed on a discrete period basis.
90
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
Col. A
|
Col. B
|
Col. C
|
Col. D
|
Col. E
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Additions
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
Charged to Costs and Expenses
|
|
Charged to Other Accounts - Describe
|
|
Deductions - Describe
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Description
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
($ thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 30, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deducted from assets or accounts:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Doubtful accounts and allowances
|
$
|
2,235
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
(A)
|
$
|
2,295
|
|
||||
|
Customer allowances
|
21,906
|
|
47,435
|
|
—
|
|
47,751
|
|
(B)
|
21,590
|
|
|||||||||
|
Customer discounts
|
1,252
|
|
2,624
|
|
—
|
|
2,981
|
|
(B)
|
895
|
|
|||||||||
|
Inventory valuation allowances
|
16,051
|
|
55,126
|
|
—
|
|
55,397
|
|
(C)
|
15,780
|
|
|||||||||
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
11,514
|
|
670
|
|
—
|
|
5,640
|
|
(D)
|
6,544
|
|
|||||||||
|
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deducted from assets or accounts:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Doubtful accounts and allowances
|
$
|
832
|
|
$
|
1,716
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
(A)
|
$
|
2,235
|
|
||||
|
Customer allowances
|
19,862
|
|
46,878
|
|
—
|
|
44,834
|
|
(B)
|
21,906
|
|
|||||||||
|
Customer discounts
|
776
|
|
3,519
|
|
—
|
|
3,043
|
|
(B)
|
1,252
|
|
|||||||||
|
Inventory valuation allowances
|
17,739
|
|
50,781
|
|
—
|
|
52,469
|
|
(C)
|
16,051
|
|
|||||||||
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
13,949
|
|
714
|
|
—
|
|
3,149
|
|
(D)
|
11,514
|
|
|||||||||
|
YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2014
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deducted from assets or accounts:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Doubtful accounts and allowances
|
$
|
973
|
|
$
|
602
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
743
|
|
(A)
|
$
|
832
|
|
||||
|
Customer allowances
|
19,080
|
|
45,099
|
|
—
|
|
44,317
|
|
(B)
|
19,862
|
|
|||||||||
|
Customer discounts
|
489
|
|
4,809
|
|
—
|
|
4,522
|
|
(B)
|
776
|
|
|||||||||
|
Inventory valuation allowances
|
19,080
|
|
53,881
|
|
—
|
|
55,222
|
|
(C)
|
17,739
|
|
|||||||||
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
8,014
|
|
6,490
|
|
—
|
|
555
|
|
(D)
|
13,949
|
|
|||||||||
|
(A)
|
Accounts written off, net of recoveries.
|
|
(B)
|
Discounts and allowances granted to wholesale customers of the Brand Portfolio segment.
|
|
(C)
|
Adjustment upon disposal of related inventories.
|
|
(D)
|
Reductions to the valuation allowance for the net operating loss carryforwards for certain states based on the Company’s expectations for utilization of net operating loss carryforwards.
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
ITEM 9A
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
It is the Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s ultimate responsibility to ensure we maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,
91
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures include mandatory communication of material events; automated accounting processing and reporting; management review of monthly, quarterly and annual results; an established system of internal controls; and internal control reviews by our internal auditors.
A control system, no matter how well-conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Furthermore, the design of a control system must reflect the fact there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to errors or fraud may occur and not be detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance that their objectives are achieved. As of January 30, 2016, management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Based on the evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors during the quarter ended January 30, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
ITEM 9B
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 10
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information regarding Directors of the Company is set forth under the caption
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding Executive Officers of the Registrant is set forth under the caption
Executive Officers of the Registrant
that can be found in Item 1 of this report, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding Section 16, Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, is set forth under the caption
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee financial expert is set forth under the caption
Board Meetings and Committees
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct, and Code of Ethics is set forth under the caption
Corporate Governance
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
92
|
ITEM 11
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
Information regarding Executive Compensation is set forth under the captions
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Executive Compensation,
and
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the Compensation Committee Report is set forth under the caption
Compensation Committee Report
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation is set forth under the caption
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
ITEM 12
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information regarding Company Stock Ownership by Directors, Officers and Principal Holders of Our Stock is set forth under the caption
Stock Ownership by Directors, Executive Officers and 5% Shareholders
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth aggregate information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans as of
January 30, 2016
:
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
|
||||||||||
|
Plan Category
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
|||||||||
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
301,295
|
|
(1)
|
18.93
|
|
(1)
|
2,136,477
|
|
(2)
|
|||
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
301,295
|
|
18.93
|
|
2,136,477
|
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
Column (a) includes 301,295 outstanding stock options (includes vested and nonvested options). Performance share rights were disregarded for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price in column (b). This table excludes restricted stock units granted to independent directors and independent directors’ deferred compensation units, which are payable only in cash and are described further in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents our remaining shares available for award grants based upon the plan provisions, which reflects our practice to reserve shares for outstanding awards. Per our current practice, the number of securities available for grant has been reduced for stock option grants. Performance share awards are reserved based on the maximum payout level.
|
Information regarding share-based plans is set forth in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements and is hereby incorporated by reference.
|
ITEM 13
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
Information regarding Certain Relationships and Related Transactions is set forth under the caption
Related Party Transactions
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding Director Independence is set forth under the caption
Director Independence
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
93
|
ITEM 14
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information regarding our Principal Accounting Fees and Services is set forth under the caption
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accountants
in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 25, 2016, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
ITEM 15
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
(a)
|
(1) and (2) The list of financial statements and Financial Statement Schedules required by this item is included in the Index on page 3 under
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
. All other schedules specified under Regulation S-X have been omitted because they are not applicable, because they are not required or because the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
|
|
(3) Exhibits
|
|
|
Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the Company are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, and the Company hereby undertakes to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of any such instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
|
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Caleres, Inc. (the “Company”) incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed June 1, 2015.
|
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws of the Company as amended through May 28, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 1, 2015.
|
|
|
4.1
|
Indenture for the 6.250% Senior Notes due 2023, dated July 27, 2015 among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors set forth therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, as incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated and filed July 27, 2015.
|
|
|
4.2
|
Form of 6.250% Senior Notes due 2023 (included in Exhibit 4.1).
|
|
|
10.1
|
First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2015 (the “Credit Agreement”), among the Company, as lead borrower for itself and on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries, and Bank of America, N.A., as lead issuing bank, administrative agent and collateral agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as an issuing bank, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as syndication agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and SunTrust Bank, as co-documentation agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto, as lenders, as incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated and filed July 20, 2015.
|
|
|
10.2a*
|
Caleres, Inc. Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, as Amended and Restated as of May 22, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive proxy statement dated and filed April 11, 2008.
|
|
|
10.2b(1)*
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement (for grants commencing May 2008) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5b(1) to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009, and filed March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
10.2b(2)*
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement (for grants prior to May 2008) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, and filed September 8, 2004.
|
|
|
10.2c(1)*
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (for grants commencing May 2008) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5c(1) to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009, and filed March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
10.2c(2)*
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (for grants prior to May 2008) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, and filed September 8, 2004.
|
|
|
10.2d*
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (for employee grants commencing 2008) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5d(1) to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009, and filed March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
†
|
10.2e*
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for non-employee director awards (for grants commencing May 2015) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011, filed herewith.
|
|
†
|
10.2f*
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for employee grants commencing March 2016) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011, filed herewith.
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
10.3a*
|
Caleres, Inc. Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011,as amended and restated effective May 28, 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
|
|
|
10.3(b)(1)*
|
Form of Performance Award Agreement (for 2012-2014 performance period) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2012, and filed September 5, 2012.
|
|
|
10.3(b)(2)*
|
Form of Performance Award Agreement (for 2013-2015 performance period) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(b)(3) to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2013, and filed April 2, 2013.
|
|
|
10.3(b)(3)*
|
Form of Performance Award Agreement (for 2014-2016 performance period) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(b)(4) to the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2014, and filed April 1, 2014.
|
|
|
10.3(b)(4)*
|
Form of Performance Award Agreement (for 2015-2017 performance period) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3(b)(4) to the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015, and filed March 31, 2015.
|
|
|
†
|
10.3(b)(5)*
|
Form of Performance Award Agreement (for 2016-2018 performance period) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011, filed herewith.
|
|
†
|
10.4a*
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between the Company and its Non-Employee Directors (for grants commencing in 2015), filed herewith.
|
|
10.5*
|
Caleres, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated as of May 28, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
|
|
|
10.6*
|
Caleres, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), as amended and restated as of May 28, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
|
|
|
10.7*
|
Caleres, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of May 28, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
|
|
|
10.8*
|
Caleres, Inc. Non-Employee Director Share Plan (2009), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
|
|
|
10.9*
|
Severance Agreement, effective April 1, 2006, between the Company and Richard M. Ausick, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, and filed September 7, 2010.
|
|
|
10.10*
|
Severance Agreement, effective April 1, 2006, between the Company and Diane M. Sullivan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated and filed April 6, 2006.
|
|
|
10.11*
|
Severance Agreement, effective April 1, 2006, between the Company and Douglas W. Koch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2013 and filed April 2, 2013.
|
|
|
10.12*
|
Severance Agreement, dated March 24, 2009 and effective as of April 1, 2009, between the Company and Daniel R. Friedman, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015 and filed March 31, 2015.
|
|
|
10.13*
|
Form of Amendment letter dated December 18, 2009, to the Severance Agreements between the Company and each of: Richard M. Ausick, Daniel R. Friedman, Douglas W. Koch and Diane M. Sullivan, as incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, and filed September 7, 2010.
|
|
|
10.14*
|
Severance Agreement, effective February 16, 2015, between the Company and Kenneth H. Hannah, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated and filed February 6, 2015.
|
|
|
10.15
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated May 14, 2013, by and among the Company, a subsidiary and Galaxy Brand Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 20, 2013.
|
|
|
†
|
21
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant.
|
|
†
|
23
|
Consent of Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
†
|
24
|
Power of attorney (contained on signature page).
|
|
†
|
31.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
†
|
31.2
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
†
|
32.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
†
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
†
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
†
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
†
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
†
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
†
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document
|
95
|
(b)
|
Exhibits:
|
|
See Item 15(a)(3) above. On request, copies of any exhibit will be furnished to shareholders upon payment of the Company’s reasonable expenses incurred in furnishing such exhibits.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Financial Statement Schedules:
|
|
See Item 8 above.
|
|
* Denotes management contract or compensatory plan arrangements.
†
Denotes exhibit is filed with this Form 10-K.
96
|
SIGNATURES
|
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
CALERES, INC.
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Kenneth H. Hannah
|
|
Kenneth H. Hannah
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Date: March 29, 2016
Know all men by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Diane M. Sullivan and Kenneth H. Hannah his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant, on the dates and in the capacities indicated.
97
|
Signatures
|
Date
|
Title
|
||
|
/s/ Diane M. Sullivan
|
||||
|
Diane M. Sullivan
|
March 29, 2016
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
|
/s/ Kenneth H. Hannah
|
||||
|
Kenneth H. Hannah
|
March 29, 2016
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
||
|
/s/ Mario L. Baeza
|
||||
|
Mario L. Baeza
|
March 22, 2016
|
Director
|
||
|
/s/ W. Lee Capps
|
||||
|
W. Lee Capps
|
March 22, 2016
|
Director
|
||
|
/s/ Lori H. Greeley
|
||||
|
Lori H. Greeley
|
March 22, 2016
|
Director
|
||
|
/s/ Mahendra R. Gupta
|
||||
|
Mahendra R. Gupta
|
March 22, 2016
|
Director
|
||
|
/s/ Carla C. Hendra
|
||||
|
Carla C. Hendra
|
March 22, 2016
|
Director
|
||
|
/s/ Ward M. Klein
|
||||
|
Ward M. Klein
|
March 22, 2016
|
Director
|
||
|
/s/ Steven W. Korn
|
||||
|
Steven W. Korn
|
March 22, 2016
|
Director
|
||
|
/s/ Patricia G. McGinnis
|
||||
|
Patricia G. McGinnis
|
March 22, 2016
|
Director
|
||
|
/s/ W. Patrick McGinnis
|
||||
|
W. Patrick McGinnis
|
March 22, 2016
|
Director
|
||
98
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1 BusinessItem 1A Risk FactorsItem 1B Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2 PropertiesItem 3 Legal ProceedingsItem 4 Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5 Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6 Selected Financial DataItem 7 Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary DataItem 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A Controls and ProceduresItem 9B Other InformationPart IIIItem 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11 Executive CompensationItem 12 Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14 Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules