|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
_________________________________________
SCHEDULE INFORMATION
_________________________________________
Consent Solicitation Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
Filed by the Registrant |
☒ |
|
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |
☐ |
Check the appropriate box:
|
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
☐ |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a -6 (e)(2)) |
|
|
☒ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
☐ |
Soliciting Material pursuant to § 240.14a -12 |
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
___________________________________________________________________________________
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
☒ |
No fee required. |
|
|
☐ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 550
St. Louis, Missouri, 63131
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
To be held on April 15, 2025
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Cass Information Systems, Inc. will be held at the location specified below on Tuesday, April 15, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. local time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect four directors to serve, each for a one -year term;
2. To hold a non -binding advisory vote on executive compensation;
3. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2025; and
4. To act upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
The close of business on February 28, 2025 has been fixed as the record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
This year’s Annual Meeting will be held at The Bogey Club, located at 9266 Clayton Road, Saint Louis, Missouri 63124.
All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting.
This booklet includes the notice and proxy statement, which describes the business we will conduct at the meeting and provides information about the Company that you should consider when you vote your shares. The Company has not planned a communications segment or any presentations for the Annual Meeting.
Whether or not you intend to be present, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. You can vote your shares by one of the following methods: vote over the internet or by telephone using the instructions on your proxy card, or mark, sign, date and promptly return your proxy card. The presence, in person or by properly executed proxy, of a majority of the common stock outstanding on the record date is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.
Please note that you will be required to present an admission ticket to attend the Annual Meeting. Your admission ticket is attached to your proxy card. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, trust, bank or other nominee, you can request an admission ticket by contacting our Investor Relations department at (314) 506 -5500 or ir@cassinfo.com.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Matthew S. Schuckman
Secretary
St. Louis, Missouri
March 6, 2025
1
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 15, 2025 : The Company’s Proxy Statement and annual report on Form 10 -K for the 2024 fiscal year are available free of charge at www.investorvote.com/cass and on our Investor Relations site at www.cassinfo.com. The Company makes available free of charge, through its website www.cassinfo.com, its annual report on Form 10 -K , quarterly reports on Form 10 -Q , current reports on Form 8 -K and amendments to those reports filed and furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). |
2
|
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
|
6 |
||
|
7 |
||
|
11 |
||
|
11 |
||
|
11 |
||
|
11 |
||
|
12 |
||
|
13 |
||
|
13 |
||
|
16 |
||
|
16 |
||
|
18 |
||
|
19 |
||
|
20 |
||
|
20 |
||
|
20 |
||
|
21 |
||
|
22 |
||
|
23 |
||
|
23 |
||
|
26 |
||
|
27 |
||
|
27 |
|
28 |
||
|
28 |
||
|
36 |
||
|
37 |
||
|
39 |
||
|
39 |
||
|
40 |
||
|
42 |
||
|
43 |
||
|
44 |
||
|
50 |
||
|
51 |
||
|
51 |
||
|
Proposal No. 3 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
53 |
|
|
55 |
||
|
Other Matters; Householding; Availability of Proxy Materials |
57 |
|
|
58 |
||
|
58 |
3
Proxy Statement
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 550
St. Louis, Missouri, 63131
Proxy Statement
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 15, 2025
This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the common shareholders of Cass Information Systems, Inc. (the Company) on or about March 6, 2025 in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board) for use at the annual meeting of shareholders (the Annual Meeting) to be held on April 15, 2025 at the time and place and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting, and at any adjournment of that meeting.
Holders of common stock, par value $.50 per share, of the Company at its close of business on February 28, 2025 (the Record Date) are entitled to receive notice of and vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 13,464,839 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Holders of record of common stock are entitled to one vote per share of common stock they held of record on the Record Date on each matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. Company management and members of the Board, in the aggregate, directly or indirectly controlled approximately 3.16% of the common stock outstanding on the Record Date.
Shareholders of record on the Record Date are entitled to cast their votes in person or by properly executed proxies at the Annual Meeting. The presence, in person or by properly executed proxy, of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the Record Date is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present at the time the Annual Meeting is convened, the Company may adjourn the Annual Meeting.
If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote which are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to elect directors; approve, by advisory vote, executive compensation; ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025; and to act on any other matters properly brought before the Annual Meeting. This means that of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, a majority of them must be voted “for” a director nominee for such nominee to be elected or “for” such other proposal for it to be approved. Shareholders may not cumulate their votes in the election of directors.
In tabulating the voting results, abstentions and shares represented by broker non -votes (explained below) will be counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. For purposes of determining whether the shareholders have elected a director nominee or approved a matter, abstentions are treated as shares represented and entitled to vote on each proposal and will thus have the same effect as a vote “against” a director nominee or such other proposal. Shares held by brokers that do not have discretionary authority to vote on a proposal and have not received voting instructions from their clients are considered “broker non -votes .” Broker non -votes will not be considered in determining the number of votes necessary for approval of a matter and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote for directors or other proposals. As such, for your vote to be counted, you must submit your voting instruction form to your broker.
Please note that brokers may not use discretionary authority to vote shares on the election of directors if they have not received instructions from their clients. Please vote your proxy so your vote can be counted. The inspector of elections appointed for the Annual Meeting will separately tabulate and certify affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes.
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is voted. Proxies may be revoked by (i) filing with the Secretary of the Company, at or before the Annual Meeting, a written notice of revocation bearing a date later than the date of the proxy, (ii) duly executing and dating a subsequent proxy relating to the common stock and delivering it to the Secretary of the Company at or before the vote is taken at the Annual Meeting, or (iii) attending the
4
Annual Meeting and voting in person (although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy). Any written notice revoking a proxy, or any subsequent proxy, should be sent to Cass Information Systems, Inc., Attn: Matthew S. Schuckman, Secretary, 12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 550, St. Louis, Missouri 63131.
All common stock represented at the Annual Meeting by properly executed proxies received prior to or at the Annual Meeting and not properly revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated in such proxies. If no instructions are indicated, such proxies will be voted FOR the election of the Board’s director nominees; FOR approval of executive compensation; FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025; and in the discretion of the proxies with respect to any other matter that is properly brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. The Board does not know of any matters other than the matters described in the Notice of Annual Meeting attached to the Proxy Statement that will come before the Annual Meeting.
The Board solicits the proxies. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone or electronic transmission by directors, officers or regular employees of the Company. It is contemplated that brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries will be requested to forward the soliciting material to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by such persons, and will be reimbursed by the Company for expenses incurred therewith. The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company.
5
Proposal No. 1
Election of Directors
Composition of the Board, Board Diversity and Director Qualifications
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
The Board recommends a vote FOR each director nominee.
|
|
|
|
|
Committee
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Ralph W. Clermont Director |
Yes |
77 |
2015 |
ò |
ò |
|||
|
Wendy J. Henry Director |
Yes |
63 |
2022 |
ò |
||||
|
James J. Lindemann Director |
Yes |
69 |
2007 |
ò |
||||
|
Sally H. Roth Director |
Yes |
77 |
2019 |
ò |
||||
Key to Committees:
|
ARC |
Audit and Risk Committee |
CC |
Compensation Committee |
NGC |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
Composition of the Board
The size of the Company’s Board is set at 12 members. On January 21, 2025, the Board approved and adopted the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (as so amended, the “Bylaws”). The amendments include the following change as it relates to the composition of the Board:
The current Board is divided into three classes. Prior to the adoption of the amended Bylaws, each director was elected for a three -year term, and the term of each class of directors expired in successive years. The amended Bylaws work to declassify the Board as directors’ terms expire as follows: each director elected at the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders will be elected for a one -year term expiring at the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders; each director elected at the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders will be elected for a one -year term expiring at the 2027 annual meeting of shareholders; and at the 2027 annual meeting of shareholders and at each annual meeting of shareholders thereafter, all directors will be elected for a one -year term expiring at the next annual meeting of shareholders.
6
Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors
Nominees and Continuing Directors
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has nominated incumbent directors Ralph W. Clermont, Wendy J. Henry, James J. Lindemann, and Sally H. Roth for re -election , each to serve a one -year term.
Each of the nominees has consented to serve if elected. If any of them become unavailable to serve as a director before the Annual Meeting, the Board may designate a substitute nominee. In that case, the persons named as proxies will vote for the substitute nominee designated by the Board. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of nominees than those named in this Proxy Statement.
The following information is submitted with respect to the nominees for election to the Board, together with the members of the Board whose terms will continue after the Annual Meeting or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified:
Director Biographies
The following is a brief biographical summary of the experience of our directors and director nominees:
Director nominees to serve a one -year term until 2026:
|
Ralph W. Clermont Ralph W. Clermont, 77, has been a director since 2015. Mr. Clermont enjoyed a 39 -year career with KPMG LLP, retiring in 2008 as managing partner of its St. Louis office where he led the firm’s Midwest financial services practice and managed the audits of numerous banking organizations. He currently serves as Lead Director of National Bank Holdings Corporation, a publicly traded bank holding company, where he is also Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee as well as a member of its Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Clermont is a certified public accountant and member of both the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Missouri Society of Certified Public Accountants. He earned his bachelor’s degree in accounting from Saint Louis University. The Board selected Mr. Clermont for his clear understanding of the complex financial and accounting issues that face multi -faceted organizations such as Cass. |
|
Wendy J. Henry Wendy J. Henry, 63, has been a director since 2022. Ms. Henry served as Managing Partner of the BKD, LLP (BKD), now Forvis Mazars, LLP, St. Louis office until her retirement in 2021. Prior to becoming Managing Partner, Ms. Henry served as an Audit Partner in BKD’s Colorado office, where she held various positions and managed the audits of numerous organizations. Her career at BKD began in 1993 when her prior firm merged into BKD. Ms. Henry is a retired certified public accountant and member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and has previously served on the board of directors at United Way of Greater St. Louis, St. Louis Zoo, Mercy Health East Communities, and Regional Business Council. She earned her bachelor’s degree in business with a concentration in accounting from Illinois College. The Board selected Ms. Henry for her financial and risk management expertise, including understanding the complex risk management, financial and accounting issues that face multi -faceted organizations such as Cass. |
|
James J. Lindemann James J. Lindemann, 69, has been a director since 2007. Until his retirement in 2018, he was Executive Vice President of Emerson Electric Co. (Emerson), a publicly traded manufacturing company based in St. Louis, Missouri. Mr. Lindemann joined Emerson in 1977, where he held a number of increasingly responsible engineering and marketing positions with its Specialty Motor business unit. In 1992, he was named President of Commercial Cam, and in 1995, he was named President of the Emerson Appliance Motor business unit. In 1996, Mr. Lindemann was promoted to Chairman and CEO of the Emerson Motor Co. He was named Senior Vice President of Emerson in 1999 and Executive Vice President in 2000. The Board selected Mr. Lindemann to serve as a director based on his experiences with Emerson, where he has served as a senior manager of a publicly traded manufacturing company, obtained international expertise and worked successfully with large corporate enterprises. |
7
Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors
|
Sally H. Roth Sally H. Roth, 77, has been a director since 2019. Ms. Roth served as Area President -Upper Midwest for Regions Bank from 2007 until her retirement in 2014. Prior to her appointment as Area President, Ms. Roth served as Regions Bank’s Commercial Banking Executive for the Saint Louis metropolitan market. Her banking career began at Mercantile Bank (now U.S. Bank) in 1985 where she held various positions including Group Manager – Large Corporate Banking and Community Bank President until 1997. Ms. Roth served in various roles at Bank of America from 1997 to 2002. She holds a Master of Business Administration degree from Washington University in Saint Louis. The Board selected Ms. Roth to serve as a director because of her extensive commercial banking experience and expertise and her unique knowledge of the banking markets in which the Company does business. |
|
The Company’s Board recommends a vote “FOR” the four nominees for election to the Board of Directors. |
Directors to serve until 2027:
|
Robert A. Ebel Robert A. Ebel, 69, has been a director since 2006. He was CEO of Universal Printing Company, a privately -held printing company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, until the sale of the company in 2017. Mr. Ebel began his tenure with Universal Printing Company as CFO and Board member in 1986. In 1996, he was appointed to the position of CEO. Mr. Ebel currently serves on the Board of the St. Louis Graphic Arts Joint Health and Welfare Fund and is active in various civic and charitable organizations in the St. Louis metropolitan area. The Board selected Mr. Ebel to serve as a director because it believes he brings valuable business management and finance expertise to the Board. His duties as CEO of a privately -held business based in St. Louis provided him with a strong knowledge of the local commercial marketplace served by the Company’s subsidiary bank. |
|
Randall L. Schilling Randall L. Schilling, 62, has been a director since 2009. He is the founder and owner of OPO Startups, a co -working center for digital startups providing space and access to mentors, investors, programming, educational resources, and a community of local entrepreneurs. He was the President and CEO of BoardPaq LLC, a privately -held software company based in St. Charles, Missouri, from 2010 until the sale of the company in 2019. From 1992 to 2010, he was the CEO of Quilogy, Inc., a nationally recognized, privately -held information technology professional services company. Mr. Schilling is currently the President CEO of Munibit, a privately held software company based in St. Charles, Missouri. Additionally, Mr. Schilling has been active in various other civic and charitable organizations in the St. Louis metropolitan area, including Partners for Progress – Education Chairman. The Board selected Mr. Schilling to serve as a director because he possesses information technology expertise to help address the challenges the Company faces in the rapidly changing information technology arena. |
|
Franklin D. Wicks, Jr. Franklin D. Wicks, Jr., 71, has been a director since 2006. He was Executive Vice President and President of Applied Markets of Sigma -Aldrich Corporation (Sigma -Aldrich ), which was a publicly -traded life science and high technology company located in St. Louis, Missouri, until his retirement in 2015. Dr. Wicks worked for Sigma -Aldrich for 33 years, beginning as a research chemist and subsequently working in marketing, then as President of Sigma Chemical and Vice President of Worldwide Operations, Sigma -Aldrich . He served as President, Scientific Research Division, Sigma -Aldrich from 1999 to 2002 and was responsible for operations in 34 countries. Prior to his appointment as Executive Vice President and President of Applied Markets of Sigma -Aldrich , Dr. Wicks served as President -SAFC . After receiving his Ph. D., Dr. Wicks served for four years on the staff of the Navigators at the Air Force Academy and at the University of Colorado at Boulder before joining Sigma -Aldrich . He currently serves on the advisory Board of Covenant Theological Seminary. The Board selected Dr. Wicks to serve as a director because of his public company senior management experience, familiarity with corporate governance, and knowledge of local and global marketplace issues. |
8
Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors
Directors to serve until 2026:
|
Eric H. Brunngraber Eric H. Brunngraber, 68, has been a director since 2003. Mr. Brunngraber currently serves as Executive Chairman of the Company, a position he has held since his retirement as CEO effective April 18, 2023 and as Chairman of the Board of Directors, a position he has held since 2015. Mr. Brunngraber has served in several executive and numerous other positions with the Company since his employment with Cass began in 1979, including as CEO from 2008 until April 2023, President from 2006 to 2022, Chief Operating Officer (COO) from 2006 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) from 1997 to 2006, and Executive Vice President of Cass Commercial Bank, the Company’s bank subsidiary. Mr. Brunngraber is and has been active in numerous civic, charitable, and professional organizations in the St. Louis metropolitan area, including the Regional Business Council, CEOs Against Cancer, and Concordance, a St. Louis based nonprofit established to reduce reincarceration rates. The Board selected Mr. Brunngraber to serve as a director because of his long tenure with the Company that has provided him with a deep understanding of its strategy, business lines, operations, finance, regulatory environment, and culture. |
|
Benjamin F. Edwards, IV Benjamin F. Edwards, IV, 69, has been a director since 2005. He is Chairman, CEO and President of Benjamin F. Edwards Company, a St. Louis -based investment firm. Previously, Mr. Edwards was branch manager of the Town Country, Missouri office of A.G. Edwards/Wachovia Securities LLC, a national investment firm. Mr. Edwards’ career with A.G. Edwards began in 1977, where he held numerous positions including Employment Manager, Financial Advisor, Associate Branch Manager, Regional Officer, Director of Sales and Marketing and President, as well as a member of the Board of Directors of A.G. Edwards from 1994 to 2007. He currently is a member of the Board of The Bogey Club in St. Louis and a member of the CEO Forum. The Board selected Mr. Edwards to serve as a director because of his management expertise in investment banking, including experience with capital markets transactions and investments in both public and private companies. |
|
Ann W. Marr Ann W. Marr, 67, has been a director since August 2022. She joined World Wide Technology, Inc. (WWT), a St. Louis based systems integrations, value added reseller and software development company, in 1997 as Executive Vice President of Global Human Resources, a position she served in until her retirement in January 2024. Ms. Marr has over 30 years of experience in human resources and has previously held positions with Enterprise Rent -A-Car and Anheuser Busch Companies. Ms. Marr also managed WWT’s Corporate Development Program, which includes diversity and inclusion, supplier diversity and small business enterprise and was President of the WWT Charitable Foundation. She is very active in the St. Louis community, having served on the Board of Trustees for Maryville University, the St. Louis Regional Chamber Association, the United Way of Greater St. Louis, Charmaine Chapman Society, The St. Louis Police Foundation, and the Gateway Arch Park Foundation. Ms. Marr also is on the Advisory Board of the National Association of African Americans in Human Resources and a member of the Society for Human Resource Management. The Board selected Ms. Marr to serve as a director because of her extensive background in human capital management, bringing perspective to the dramatic changes in the work environment and her leadership and oversight experience with respect human resources and other executive compensation related matters. |
|
Martin H. Resch Martin H. Resch, 59, was elected to serve as a director on the Board in 2023. Mr. Resch is President and CEO of the Company, positions he has held since 2022 and April 2023, respectively. Prior to joining the Company in November 2020, Resch was senior executive at Bank of the West in San Francisco, California. As executive vice president, Resch functioned as the commercial banking group’s chief administrative officer/chief operating officer with responsibility for strategy, operations, finance, technology and human resources, as well as collaborating with a B2B FinTech incubator. His other roles at Bank of the West included serving as corporate treasurer and leading the regulatory response to the Dodd -Frank and Volcker legislation. Resch earned his bachelor’s degree in computer science from Oregon State University and master’s degree in business administration from Cornell University. The Board selected Mr. Resch to serve as a director because of his role as the Company’s CEO in which he is responsible for the strategic direction and day -to-day leadership of the Company. Furthermore, Mr. Resch has highly relevant technology experience and valuable insights running banks. |
9
Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors
|
Joseph D. Rupp Joseph D. Rupp, 74, has been a director since 2016. He currently serves as Lead Director of the Board, a position he has held since 2019. He retired from a 45 -year tenure with Olin Corporation (Olin), a publicly traded global manufacturer and distributor of chemical products and a leading U.S. manufacturer of ammunition located in Clayton, Missouri. During his time at Olin, Mr. Rupp served as Chairman of the Board from 2016 until his retirement in 2017, as Chairman and CEO from 2015 to 2016, as Chairman, President and CEO from 2005 to 2014, and as President and CEO from 2002 to 2005. Mr. Rupp previously served on the board of directors of Nucor Corporation, a publicly traded producer of steel and related products, Dot Foods, Inc., a privately held foodservice redistribution company, and O -I Glass, Inc., a publicly traded glass bottle manufacturer. He earned his bachelor’s degree in metallurgical engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology. The Board selected Mr. Rupp to serve as Lead Director because it believes he has valuable experience understanding the day -to-day and more complex issues that face multi -faceted , publicly traded organizations. |
Director Independence
Based on the independence standards as defined by the Nasdaq marketplace rules, the Board has determined in its business judgment that all of the directors and director -nominees are independent as such term is defined in the Nasdaq listing standards, except for Mr. Brunngraber and Mr. Resch. In addition, each of the members of the Audit and Risk Committee and Compensation Committee meets the heightened independence standards set forth in the SEC rules and the Nasdaq listing standards. In making these determinations, the Board has reviewed all transactions and relationships between each director (or any member of his or her immediate family) and the Company, including transactions and relationships described in the directors’ responses to questions regarding employment, business, family, and other relationships with the Company and its management. These included transactions relating to non -audit accounting services provided to the Company by Forvis, LLP, Ms. Henry’s former employer, and commissions paid in connection with the Company’s share repurchase program to Benjamin F. Edwards Company, of which Mr. Edwards serves as Chairman, CEO and President. The Board has concluded that these transactions did not impair director independence for a variety of reasons, including that (i) the amounts in question were considerably under the thresholds set forth in applicable independence standards, in each case less than 1% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues, (ii) Ms. Henry and Mr. Edwards did not have a direct or indirect interest in the transactions, and (iii) the relationships overall were deemed immaterial. As a result of this review, the Board concluded, as to each independent director, that no relationship exists which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
10
Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board oversees and guides the Company’s management and its business affairs. Committees support the role of the Board on issues that benefit from consideration by a smaller, more focused subset of directors. All committee members are elected by and serve at the pleasure of the Board. In its oversight of the Company, the Board sets the tone for the ethical standards and performance of management, staff, and the Company as a whole. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that capture the long -standing practices of the Company as well as current corporate governance best practices. The guidelines are available on our Investor Relations site at www.cassinfo.com.
The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct and Business Ethics policy, applicable to all Company directors, executive officers and employees. This policy is publicly available and can be viewed on the Company’s Investor Relations site at www.cassinfo.com.
Board Evaluation
The Board conducts a self -assessment annually to review its performance over the past year and determine whether it and its committees are functioning effectively. The Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for leading the review of the Board and summarizing the overall findings. Each member of the Board conducts a thorough evaluation of the Board as a whole and each member of the Board individually. This assessment seeks to review areas in which the Board and/or management believes a better contribution could be made. The Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the evaluations and presents a summary of findings to the Board. The Board uses this information to create a set of action items for any areas in which members feel could improve the Board’s effectiveness.
Each individual Board committee also conducts its own self -assessment annually and presents a summary to the Board. The Board then determines if there are steps that should be taken to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of each committee.
The purpose of these annual evaluations is not to focus on individual Board members, but the Board and each committee as a whole. A separate assessment of each individual director is made by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee when deciding whether to nominate such director for reelection to the Board.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews the self -assessment process and makes changes it deems necessary to improve the process and its effectiveness.
Board Leadership Structure
The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide guidance and flexibility that allows the Board to determine the best leadership structure to promote Board effectiveness and ensure that authority and responsibility are effectively allocated between the Board and management. The Board recognizes that no single leadership model is right for all companies and at all times, and depending on the circumstances and personnel, different leadership structures may be appropriate. Accordingly, the Board formally reviews its leadership structure not less than annually as part of its self -evaluation process to ensure that the proper balance is present in the Company’s current model.
In April 2023, as part of a planned succession process, Mr. Brunngraber transitioned roles from Chairman and CEO to Executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Resch succeeded Mr. Brunngraber as CEO and was appointed to the Board. The Board thoroughly evaluated its leadership structure in the period leading up to this transition. The Board believes that
11
Corporate Governance
Mr. Brunngraber, as the former CEO and extensive experience with the Company, continues to be best situated to serve as Chairman at this time because his deep understanding of the Company’s operations and strategic plan make him uniquely qualified to provide the continuity needed to continue to ensure a smooth transition of the CEO role.
The Board believes that Mr. Rupp, as Lead Independent Director, brings to the Board experience, oversight, and expertise from outside the Company that allows him to provide strong independent oversight of management. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Lead Director must qualify as independent in accordance with the Guidelines. It is the Lead Director’s role to promote the appropriate involvement of the independent directors in governance matters and ensure the effectiveness of the independent directors in their role on behalf of the shareholders. In particular, the Lead Director is responsible for (a) staying regularly informed about the strategy of the Company and about critical issues and performance of the Company; (b) working with both the Chairman and CEO to set the agendas for Board meetings; (c) calling meetings of the independent directors when needed; (d) providing Board leadership in times of crisis; (e) setting the agenda for and chairing executive sessions of the independent directors; (f) acting as liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman for matters raised in executive sessions; (g) chairing meetings of the Board or shareholders when the Chairman is not in attendance; (h) attending meetings of the committees of the Board when necessary or at his/her discretion and communicating regularly with the chairs of the Board committees; (i) working with the Chairman to ensure the conduct of Board meetings provides adequate time for serious discussion of important issues and that appropriate information is made available to Board members on a timely basis; (j) being available on request for consultation and direct communication with major shareholders; and (k) performing such other duties as may be requested from time to time by the Board or by a majority of the independent directors.
For these reasons, and after considering the perspectives of the independent directors and benchmarking and performance data, the Board determined that this leadership structure continues to be in the best interests of shareholders at this time. With a former CEO serving as Chairman, there is unified leadership and continuity, while the Lead Independent Director holds management accountable for the Company’s continued success. While the Board has determined that this leadership structure is best for the Company and its shareholders at this time, the Board will continue to monitor its effectiveness and appropriateness.
In accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, non -management directors convene quarterly without the presence of management directors or executive officers of the Company.
Risk Management Oversight
The Board believes that risk is inherent in innovation and the pursuit of long -term growth opportunities. The Company’s management is responsible for day -to-day risk management activities. The Board, acting directly and through its committees, is responsible for the oversight of the Company’s risk management practices. The Board’s role in the Company’s risk oversight process includes regular reviews of information from senior management (generally through Board committee presentation) regarding the areas of material risk to the Company. A description of certain material risks affecting the Company can be found in the Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2024. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and arrangements. The Audit and Risk Committee oversees management of financial reporting, legal and regulatory compliance, and information technology risks, including cybersecurity risks. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee manages risks associated with the independence of the Board, potential conflicts of interest, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters. Each committee reports regularly to the full Board on its activities. In addition, the Board participates in regular discussions with the Company’s senior management on many core subjects, including strategy, operations, finance, legal compliance, and public policy matters, in which risk oversight is an inherent element. The members of the Board also receive regular training from outside counsel on key risk topics, including legal and regulatory compliance, public company reporting requirements, ESG matters, information technology, cybersecurity and data privacy, as well as other topics of importance to public company governance, in order to remain current on best practices in managing risk.
12
Corporate Governance
Communications with the Board of Directors
The Board has established a process by which shareholders can communicate with the Board. Shareholders may communicate with any and all members of the Board by transmitting correspondence to the following address: Cass Information Systems, Inc., Name of Director(s), Attn: Matthew S. Schuckman, Secretary, 12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 550, St. Louis, Missouri 63131.
The Secretary will forward all correspondence to the Chairman or the identified director as soon as practicable. Correspondence addressed to the full Board will be forwarded to the Chairman, who will present the correspondence to the full Board or a committee thereof.
Board Meetings and Committees of the Board
The Board holds regularly scheduled meetings in January, April, July, and October. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Board held its four regular meetings, and one additional offsite planning meeting was held in November to discuss the Company’s strategic plan. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and committees on which they served in 2024. The Company’s directors are encouraged, but not required, to attend the Company’s Annual Meeting. Each director who was serving on the Board at the time of the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders attended the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The Company has three standing committees: the Audit and Risk Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee. Each of these committees has a written charter approved by the Board annually. A copy of each charter can be found in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.cassinfo.com.
The following table represents the current membership of each of the Board committees and number of meetings held by each committee in 2024 (in parentheses). Each of the committees is comprised entirely of independent directors, as defined by Nasdaq and SEC rules.
|
Audit and Risk (5) |
Nominating and Corporate Governance (4) |
Compensation (4) |
|
Ralph W. Clermont * |
Ralph W. Clermont |
James J. Lindemann * |
|
Robert A. Ebel |
Benjamin F. Edwards, IV |
Ann W. Marr |
|
Wendy J. Henry |
Sally H. Roth |
Joseph D. Rupp |
|
Randall L. Schilling |
Franklin D. Wicks, Jr. * |
Franklin D. Wicks, Jr. |
|
*Committee Chairman |
13
Corporate Governance
|
Audit and Risk Committee |
The Audit and Risk Committee operates pursuant to the written charter approved by the Board. The charter is reviewed annually by the Committee and the Board and amended as appropriate to reflect the changing needs of the Company for risk oversight and the role of the Audit and Risk Committee in providing sound oversight in accordance with current best practices.
The Audit and Risk Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and the audits of the Company’s financial statements. The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for appointing, determining funding for and overseeing the independent registered public accountants for the Company, and meeting with and communicating between the independent registered public accountants and other corporate officers to review and participate in matters relating to corporate financial reporting and accounting procedures and policies. Among other responsibilities, the Audit and Risk Committee reviews financial information provided to shareholders and others, assesses the adequacy of financial and accounting controls, oversees implementation of new accounting standards and evaluates the scope of the audits of the independent registered public accountants and reports on the results of such reviews to the Board. In addition, the Audit and Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the performance of the Company’s internal auditors. The Audit and Risk Committee meets with the internal auditors on a quarterly basis to review the scope and results of their work.
The Audit and Risk Committee also has primary responsibility for overseeing risks related to legal and regulatory compliance, information technology, data protection and cybersecurity, including the implementation of artificial intelligence, although the full Board also exercises oversight over these risks. This oversight includes receiving reports from the Company’s CIO on data protection and cybersecurity matters and strategies on a quarterly basis, with more frequent consultation should the need arise due to a specifically identified threat event or risk. Changes to the Company’s information security policies and programs are approved by the Audit and Risk Committee.
The Audit and Risk Committee is composed entirely of independent directors, each of whom meets the SEC’s independence and experience requirements. Further, the Board has determined that each of Mr. Clermont and Ms. Henry qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the SEC and in accordance with the Nasdaq listing rules. In accordance with the charter, the Audit and Risk Committee meets as often as it determines necessary to fulfill its responsibilities, but not less than quarterly. The Committee met five times in 2024.
|
Compensation Committee |
The Compensation Committee fulfills the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s directors, CEO, and other executives. The Compensation Committee also has responsibility for approving, evaluating, and administering the compensation plans, policies, and overall programs of the Company. The Compensation Committee is able to delegate any of its responsibilities to one or more subcommittees as it deems appropriate in its discretion.
Compensation Processes and Procedures
As specified in its charter, the Compensation Committee recommends annual retainer fees, Board and committee meeting fees, and terms and awards of stock compensation for non -management directors, subject to appropriate approval by the Board or shareholders.
The Compensation Committee also establishes and administers the Company’s executive compensation program and related benefits. While the Compensation Committee may seek input and recommendations from the CEO, CFO, or the Senior Vice President of Human Resources concerning the elements of executive and director compensation, and confer with them on compensation philosophies, all significant matters regarding compensation for executives are ultimately the responsibility of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee annually reviews corporate goals and objectives relative to the CEO’s compensation and determines the CEO’s compensation level based on this evaluation, subject to Board approval. The Compensation Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board salary levels and incentive stock compensation for executive officers of the Company, and approving incentive stock compensation for other members of management as recommended by the CEO. The responsibility for allocating cash bonuses for executive officers other than himself is delegated to the CEO, in accordance with provisions of the profit -sharing program approved by the Board.
14
Corporate Governance
Periodically, the Company uses compensation specialists to assist in designing or modifying some components of its overall compensation program and to provide comparison data of compensation at other organizations with which the Company competes for executive management talent. In such circumstances, the Compensation Committee does not rely solely on survey data or the consultant’s judgment or recommendation, but considers such data when exercising its judgment in evaluating the Company’s compensation program.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Ms. Marr and Messrs. Lindemann, Rupp and Wicks served on the Compensation Committee during the entire fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. None of the members of the Compensation Committee during the last fiscal year is or has been an officer or employee of the Company. None of the Company’s executive officers currently serves, or in the past fiscal year has served, as a member of the Board of Directors or compensation committee (or other Board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on the Board or the Compensation Committee.
None of the members of the Company’s Compensation Committee or other members of the Board is a person having a relationship requiring disclosure by the Company pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S -K .
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board, recommending director -nominees , and developing and addressing corporate governance principles and issues applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also oversees the Company’s progress on ESG matters, working with the Company’s management and ESG Committee.
In recommending director -nominees to the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee solicits candidate recommendations from its own members, other directors, and management. In evaluating candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into consideration such factors as it deems appropriate, including any legal requirements or listing standards requirements. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers a candidate’s judgment, skills, integrity and moral character, experience with organizations of comparable size and complexity, the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board members, and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable and valuable addition to the Board and any committees of the Board. Furthermore, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also evaluates candidates’ relevant experience in business generally and within the financial industry, as well as a candidate’s education and other matters, and seeks candidates with skills and acumen relating to audit and finance functions, corporate governance, culture, human capital management, operations and technology, cybersecurity, risk management, and specific industries strategically important to the Company. With respect to incumbent candidates, the Committee also considers meeting attendance, meeting participation and the Board evaluation. The criteria and selection process are not standardized and could vary from time to time.
In general, no person who will have reached the age of 75 prior to election date may be nominated for election or re -election to the Board. However, the Board will review individual circumstances and the best interests of the Company and its shareholders when considering the nomination of directors and may from time to time choose to nominate a director who is 75 years old or older, particularly where such a director possesses unique skills, experience, or leadership traits, or would otherwise continue to be a valuable contributor to the mission of the Board. It is also the Board’s practice to limit new directors to no more than two per year in order to maintain Board continuity. Ms. Roth, 77 and Mr. Clermont, 77, have been nominated to serve as directors for a one -year term in order to help with board succession.
Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not specifically solicit suggestions for possible candidates from shareholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by shareholders who meet the criteria discussed above and set by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, with the concurrence of the full Board. The criteria will be re -evaluated periodically and will include those criteria set out in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter. The Company’s bylaws require that shareholders send timely notice of director nominations to our Secretary and that any such notice include the information set forth in the Company’s bylaws, as further discussed in the section “Shareholder Proposals for the 2026 Annual Meeting” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
15
Corporate Governance
Board Diversity
Director Snapshot
While the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, the Company and the Board strongly believe diversity is critical to the Company’s success and creating long -term value for shareholders. The Company believes that a Board consisting of individual directors with diverse backgrounds ensures broader representation and inspires deeper commitment to management, employees, and the community. Diversity in gender, ethnic background, professional experience, and other experiences are prioritized when considering candidates for director. As of December 31, 2024, the Board consists of nine men and three women, with one person of color. The Company enhanced its Board diversity in recent years and is committed to continue its focus and efforts on Board diversity in the future.
Director Compensation
Each director of the Company who is not an officer or employee of the Company receives compensation for his or her services as follows:
|
Annual Retainer
|
Annual Retainer
|
|
|
Lead Director |
27,500 |
27,500 |
|
Board Member |
52,000 |
52,000 |
|
Audit and Risk Committee Chair |
15,000 |
15,000 |
|
Audit and Risk Committee Member |
7,500 |
7,500 |
|
Compensation Committee Chair |
12,000 |
12,000 |
|
Compensation Committee Member |
5,000 |
5,000 |
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair |
10,000 |
10,000 |
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member |
5,000 |
5,000 |
|
Restricted Stock Award * |
70,000 |
80,000 |
*Directors will receive the equity equivalent of the dollar amounts indicated above
16
Corporate Governance
Restricted stock awards to directors are issued under the Company’s 2023 Omnibus Stock and Performance Compensation Plan (the Omnibus Plan), which was approved by shareholders in 2023. Because they are time -based awards, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock unit (RSU) awards accrue dividends and dividend equivalents, which will be paid upon vesting of the awards. Restricted stock carries voting rights from the date of grant, and RSU awards provide voting rights upon settlement in shares. Shares vest in full on the first anniversary date of the awards or, if elected by the director, vest at retirement from the Board, as disclosed below. The grant date of restricted stock and RSU awards to non -employee directors is typically two days following the Annual Meeting, when the full Board approves the awards. In accordance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines, directors are expected to retain all shares granted to them during their service as Board members and are encouraged to acquire stock in amounts consistent with their financial resources.
The Company maintains a non -employee director compensation election program to allow non -employee directors to receive their annual board member retainer fees in the form of restricted stock or RSUs and provide for a separate election to defer the vesting of awards and any underlying dividends or dividend equivalents until the date of termination of service as a director. Elections must be made prior to the calendar year for which the election will apply and made annually, with the exception of the first year in which a director becomes eligible to participate, after which the election must be made within 30 days.
Summary Compensation - Directors
The table below sets forth the following compensation for each director who is not a named executive officer or employee for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024: (i) dollar value of fees earned or paid; (ii) aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards; (iii) all other compensation; and (iv) dollar value of total compensation.
|
Name (1) |
Fees Earned or Paid
|
Stock Awards ($) (3) |
All Other
|
Total ($) |
|
Ralph W. Clermont |
94,500 |
69,975 |
23,300 |
187,775 |
|
Robert A. Ebel |
74,500 |
69,975 |
16,945 |
161,420 |
|
Benjamin F. Edwards, IV |
57,000 |
69,975 |
1,936 |
128,911 |
|
Wendy J. Henry |
59,500 |
69,975 |
5,152 |
134,627 |
|
James J. Lindemann |
69,000 |
69,975 |
27,940 |
166,915 |
|
Ann W. Marr |
57,000 |
69,975 |
5,243 |
132,218 |
|
Sally H. Roth |
72,000 |
69,975 |
10,892 |
152,867 |
|
Joseph D. Rupp |
84,500 |
69,975 |
20,970 |
175,445 |
|
Randall L. Schilling |
59,500 |
69,975 |
27,940 |
157,415 |
|
Franklin D. Wicks, Jr. |
72,000 |
69,975 |
25,344 |
167,319 |
(1) Compensation for Mr. Resch is set forth in Executive Officers – Summary Compensation Table and related tables. Because Mr. Resch is an employee of the Company, he did not receive any additional compensation for services as director in 2024. Mr. Brunngraber served as a non -executive employee of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2024 and did not receive separate compensation for his services as a director. Mr. Brunngraber was compensated in 2024 pursuant to his Executive Chairman compensation arrangement, which is described below.
(2) Represents fees paid during 2024 for services as a director. For Mr. Rupp, the amount also includes fees received as the Lead Director. Amounts include the following fees for service on the Executive Loan Committee of Cass Commercial Bank, the Company’s bank subsidiary: Mr. Clermont, $15,000; Ms. Roth $15,000; and Mr. Ebel, $15,000. Messrs. Clermont, Lindemann, Rupp, Schilling, and Wicks elected to receive their Board retainer fees in the form of restricted stock and each received 1,202 shares of restricted stock in lieu of $52,000 of cash payments. The restricted stock vests in full on the first anniversary of the grant date of the awards or, if elected by the director, vests at retirement from the Board.
(3) These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for restricted stock and RSU awards granted to directors in fiscal 2024. Shares vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date or, if elected by the director, upon the director’s retirement from the Board. These amounts were computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standard Codification Topic 718 (FASB ASC Topic 718). These amounts do not represent the actual amounts paid to or realized by the directors during fiscal year 2024. The value as of the grant date for restricted stock is recognized over the number of days of service required for the grant to become vested. See Note 11 to the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2024 for a complete description of the material assumptions
17
Corporate Governance
applied in determining grant date fair value. The aggregate number of shares of restricted stock and RSU awards issued and outstanding at December 31, 2024 for each director was as follows and for Mr. Brunngraber includes prior stock -based awards received in his role as CEO and Executive Chairman with performance -based shares of 36,326 assumed to vest at the target level of performance:
|
Name |
Shares * |
RSUs * |
||
|
Eric H. Brunngraber |
36,326 |
24,218 |
||
|
Ralph W. Clermont |
20,410 |
— |
||
|
Robert A. Ebel |
14,401 |
— |
||
|
Benjamin F. Edwards, IV |
1,602 |
— |
||
|
Wendy J. Henry |
4,655 |
— |
||
|
James J. Lindemann |
24,245 |
— |
||
|
Ann W. Marr |
4,730 |
— |
||
|
Sally H. Roth |
9,399 |
— |
||
|
Joseph D. Rupp |
18,485 |
— |
||
|
Randall L. Schilling |
24,245 |
— |
||
|
Franklin D. Wicks, Jr. |
22,100 |
— |
||
|
* If elected, included shares received in lieu of cash retainer fees and/or shares deferred until retirement |
||||
(4) Represents dividends paid or accrued on unvested time -based restricted stock and RSU awards for all directors other than Mr. Brunngraber. For Mr. Brunngraber, the amount reported represents dividends paid or accrued on unvested time -based restricted stock and RSUs of $29,304 and the additional compensation received by Mr. Brunngraber for his services in fiscal 2024 as an employee Executive Chairman, as more fully discussed in the narrative below.
Effective April 2023, Mr. Brunngraber retired as CEO of the Company and has remained an employee of the Company in the Executive Chairman role for which he receives the following compensation: (i) a base salary of $562,000; (ii) eligibility to receive an annual target profit -sharing bonus of 40% of his base salary; (iii) a long -term incentive compensation (LTIC) opportunity at target based on 100*% of his base salary (for 2024, comprised of 40% time -based RSUs and 60% performance -based restricted stock); and (iv) continuation of certain employee benefits and perquisites.
For fiscal 2024, Mr. Brunngraber received the following compensation as Executive Chairman: (i) salary payments of $562,000; (ii) a 2024 profit -sharing bonus of $80,900; (iii) a grant date fair value of $561,996 based on a 2024 LTIC award of 5,076 time -based RSUs and 7,613 shares of performance -based restricted stock that may be earned at the target achievement level; (iv) matching 401(k) contributions of $20,700; and (v) other benefits and perquisites totaling $30,000. In January 2025, Mr. Brunngraber received a grant date fair value of $561,990 based on a 2025 LTIC award of 5,422 time -based RSUs and 8,133 performance -based RSUs that may be earned at the target achievement level. The number of 2024 and 2025 performance -based LTIC awards that will ultimately be earned and vest, if any, will vary in an amount from 0% to 150% of the target amount awarded based on the achievement of pre -established financial performance goals over the prospective three -year performance period from the date of grant. The terms and conditions of the Company’s profit -sharing program and LTIC program, including as they relate to Mr. Brunngraber’s 2024 awards, are fully described in “Executive Compensation and Related Information – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement. The grant date fair value of Mr. Brunngraber’s LTIC awards is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, is based on the target number of performance -based restricted stock or RSUs, as applicable, and is calculated using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant of $44.29 for grants made on January 25, 2024 and of $41.46 for grants made on January 23, 2025. These amounts do not represent the actual amounts paid to or realized by Mr. Brunngraber. The value as of the grant date for restricted stock is recognized over the number of days of service required for the grant to become vested. See Note 11 to the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2024 for a complete description of the material assumptions applied in determining grant date fair value.
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Some of the directors and executive officers of the Company, and members of their immediate families and firms and corporations with which they are associated, have had transactions with the Company’s subsidiary bank, including borrowings and investments in depository accounts. All such loans and investments have been made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates charged or paid and collateral required, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
18
Corporate Governance
During the year ended December 31, 2024, Mr. Brunngraber, a director of the Company, also served as an employee of the Company as Executive Chairman. Compensation paid to Mr. Brunngraber for his services as Executive Chairman during fiscal 2024 are included in “Summary Compensation – Directors” above. Mr. Brunngraber will continue to be compensated pursuant to his existing compensation arrangement, as disclosed in “Summary Compensation – Directors.”
As provided by the Audit and Risk Committee’s charter, the Audit and Risk Committee must review and approve all transactions between the Company and any related person that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S -K . “Related person” and “transaction” shall have the meanings given to such terms in Item 404 of Regulation S -K , as amended from time to time. In determining whether to approve or ratify a particular transaction, the Audit and Risk Committee will take into account any factors it deems relevant.
Report of the Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee assists the Board in providing oversight of the systems and procedures relating to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s financial reporting process, its systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the internal audit process, risk management, the annual independent audit process of the Company’s annual financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the qualification and independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. These responsibilities are laid out in the Audit and Risk Committee’s charter, which is available on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.cassinfo.com.
The Audit and Risk Committee reviews with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, mitigate, and control such exposures. Management has the responsibility for the implementation of these activities. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, including a discussion of the quality and the acceptability of the Company’s financial reporting and controls.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Committee reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm the firm’s judgments as to the quality and the acceptability of the Company’s financial reporting and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Committee under auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) (United States), including the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees), and the rules and regulations of the SEC. In addition, the Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the firm’s independence, including the impact of non -audit-related services provided to the Company, and has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accounting firm’s communications with the Audit and Risk Committee concerning independence.
The Committee also discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm in advance the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Committee meets regularly with the internal auditor and the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 for filing with the SEC.
|
Ralph W. Clermont, Chairman
|
19
Corporate Governance
Information Security and Data Privacy
The Company has a comprehensive Information Security Policy and ensures data privacy policies adhere to the requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation, California Consumer Privacy Act, and other state and local data privacy regulations to the extent they impact the Company’s operations and handling of personal data. All employees are required to take regular training on information security requirements and must acknowledge policies and standards annually. In addition, the Company conducts ongoing phishing campaigns to test and educate all employees on how to spot phishing attacks and to measure the effectiveness of our training program. The Cass Global Data Privacy Policy, which addresses the privacy of our clients’ information, is available on our Investor Relations site at www.cassinfo.com. The Cass Commercial Bank Legal Disclaimers, Privacy Statement and Cookie Policy is also available on our Investor Relations site at www.cassinfo.com.
Insider Trading Policy and Procedures
The Company has adopted insider trading policies and procedures applicable to our directors, officers, and employees, and has implemented processes for the Company that it believes is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules, and regulations, and the Nasdaq listing standards. The Company’s insider trading policy, among other things, (i) prohibits directors, officers, and employees from trading in securities of the Company and certain other companies while in possession of material, non -public information; (ii) prohibits our directors, officers, and employees from disclosing material, non -public information of the Company and certain other companies to others; and (iii) requires that directors and certain designated officers obtain pre -clearance before trading in Company securities and only transact in Company securities during an open window period, subject to limited exceptions. A copy of the Company’s insider trading policy can be found as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Environmental, Social, and Governance
Acting with the highest degree of honesty, integrity, and compassion for all of the Company’s stakeholders, from clients and employees to the communities and the world around us, has been a hallmark of the Company’s culture for over 100 years. The Company is increasingly focused on and committed to strong ESG practices and believes ESG standards and business practices are aligned with the Company’s corporate purpose and values. The Company recognizes the importance for stakeholders to know and understand ESG initiatives and encourages stakeholders to read the Company’s annual ESG Report available on our Investor Relations site at www.cassinfo.com.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors oversees the Company’s position and practices on ESG matters and other significant public policy issues, including but not limited to the protection of the environment, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability.
Environmental
The Company monitors its energy consumption and is committed to improving metrics such as emissions per transaction and as a percent of revenue. The Company also supports its clients with many sustainable products and services as more fully described in the Company’s ESG Report available on our Investor Relations site at www.cassinfo.com.
Social
The Company is focused on engaging its employees. The Company offers many attractive benefits to help support its employees, including profit sharing and an employee assistance program. The Company also has robust policies on equal opportunities, anti -harassment and non -discrimination . The health and safety of employees and work -life balance are actively promoted as more fully described in the Company’s ESG Report.
20
Corporate Governance
Governance
The Company strongly supports adherence to the Company’s Code of Conduct and Business Ethics and anonymous reporting of unethical or questionable practices without retaliation. The Company believes in a conservative and long -term view of risk management by various specialized committees, including strict focus on information and data privacy risk management. The Company has developed strong governance practices, including Board oversight as described above and in the Company’s ESG Report.
Shareholder Engagement
The Company greatly values feedback from its shareholders and relies on such feedback to help tailor its business policies and practices. Accordingly, in addition to soliciting feedback through proxy voting, the Company frequently interacts with shareholders throughout the year by participating in investor conferences and presentations and holding other meetings with current and prospective shareholders to provide transparency around emerging issues, discuss milestones, and inform decision -making .
During fiscal 2024, incorporating input from discussions and meetings with shareholders, the Company continued to devote time and resources to a number of ESG -driven policies and programs as discussed in the Company’s ESG Report.
21
Proposal No. 2
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
The Board is committed to excellence in governance and recognizes that executive compensation is an important matter for the Company’s shareholders. At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 16, 2024, the shareholders were given the opportunity to endorse or not endorse, on a non -binding advisory basis, the Company’s compensation program for named executive officers by voting for or against a resolution calling for the approval of such program for the 2024 fiscal year. Shareholders approved the compensation program with approximately 96% of the votes cast by the holders of common stock.
The core of the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and practice continues to be to pay for performance. The Company’s executive officers are compensated in a manner consistent with the Company’s strategy, competitive practice, sound corporate governance principles, and shareholder interests and concerns. The Company believes its compensation program is strongly aligned with the long -term interests of shareholders, as exhibited in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, which provides additional details on executive compensation, compensation philosophy and objectives, and the compensation of the named executive officers for the prior fiscal year. Shareholders are asked to vote on the following resolution:
“ RESOLVED , that the shareholders approve the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and any related material contained in this Proxy Statement.”
The above -referenced disclosures are included in this Proxy Statement under the Executive Compensation and Related Information section.
The Board urges shareholders to endorse the compensation program for our executive officers by voting FOR the above resolution. As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee of the Board believes that the Company’s executive compensation is reasonable and appropriate, is justified by the performance of the Company, and is the result of a carefully considered approach.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is non -binding and will not overrule any decision by the Board or require the Board to take any action. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of the Company’s shareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers. It is expected that the next say -on-pay vote will occur at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Company currently holds the say -on-pay vote every year.
|
The Company’s Board recommends a vote “FOR” the Company’s executive compensation program as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and otherwise in this Proxy Statement. |
22
Executive Compensation and Related Information
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview of Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The Compensation Committee believes that the skill and dedication of executive officers and other management personnel are critical factors affecting the Company’s long -term success in meeting its objectives and fostering growth and profitability. In support of this, compensation programs have been designed to attract and retain a high level of talented leadership, reward performance in accordance with results, provide an incentive for future performance and align Company executives’ long -term interests with those of the shareholders.
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CDA) describes, in detail, the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and programs provided to named executive officers as they are determined under SEC rules. For 2024, named executive officers, as determined and designated by the Company, included the following individuals:
|
Name |
Title in Fiscal 2024 |
|
|
Martin H. Resch |
President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) |
|
|
Michael J. Normile |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) |
|
|
James M. Cavellier |
Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer (CIO) |
|
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
President, Cass Commercial Bank |
The overall compensation program is designed to result in compensation that is commensurate with Company and individual performance. The Company believes that high levels of performance should yield compensation that is competitive externally and equitable internally. The Compensation Committee periodically assesses the Company’s compensation programs to confirm incentives are in place to retain key management talent, reward attainment of longer -term objectives, and assure these programs do not encourage risky behavior on the part of individuals or the executive management team.
In order to assure executive compensation is both competitive and appropriate, the Compensation Committee reviews executive compensation in its entirety before determining any adjustments to specific compensation components. In this process, the Compensation Committee primarily considers the value of cash and incentive equity compensation. Benefits, such as retirement benefits provided under the Company’s defined contribution plan are also considered, though these elements are given less weight. Gains from prior equity incentive awards are also given less weight, as these were awards earned and granted based on prior performance.
23
Executive Compensation
For fiscal 2024, the components of total direct compensation (TDC) for the named executive officers and their purposes were as follows:
|
Compensation Element |
Fixed/
|
Key Features |
Purpose |
|
Base Salary |
Fixed |
Reviewed by Compensation Committee annually Varies with experience, duties, and scope of responsibility |
Provides a base level of fixed pay to attract and retain executives that is internally equitable and externally competitive |
|
Profit-Sharing Bonus |
Variable |
Paid two times a year provided the Company is profitable overall, and then based on a pool of funds set at 22.5% of net income after taxes (NIAT), providing bonuses to all employees unless specifically excluded due to their employment class or failure to meet minimum performance expectations. If there is no NIAT, then the pool of funds would be $0. CEO is eligible to receive up to 5.4% of the total pool of funds available for distribution depending on the change in NIAT, not to exceed 70% of base salary for the year. At a target 8% increase in NIAT, the CEO receives 45% of salary in profit sharing. Other named executive officers receive amounts based on change in NIAT and individual performance not to exceed 50% of base salary of any officer. Target change in NIAT is set at 8%. |
Provides annual incentive opportunity and rewards employees for overall Company and individual performance |
|
Long-Term Incentive Equity Compensation (LTIC) |
Granted annually with 3 -year cliff vesting CEO target = 125% of base salary; Other named executive officers target = 70% of base salary |
Encourages retention through a 3 -year cliff vesting Supports the achievement of Company’s longer -term financial goals of sustained earnings per share (EPS) growth and target return on equity (ROE) |
|
|
Fixed |
40% time -based restricted stock/units |
||
|
Variable |
60% performance -based restricted stock/u nits |
Aligns interests of executives with shareholders |
24
Executive Compensation
The charts that follow show the percentages of each component of TDC paid to the CEO and the average percentages of each of the TDC components paid to the other named executive officers for fiscal 2024.
Based on the market data provided by Pay Governance, an independent third -party compensation consultant, as part of the annual review of executive compensation, the Committee believes the composition of TDC for named executive officers is in alignment with companies of a similar size and in similar industries as the Company. For 2024, approximately 59% of the CEO’s TDC was in the form of performance -based profit -sharing , to emphasize the importance of annual profitability, and LTIC, to emphasize the importance of long -term strength, profitability and growth in the value of the Company’s common stock.
In its determination of the level, composition and administration of executive compensation, the Committee understands the importance of aligning executive compensation with the performance of the Company, the long -term interests of its shareholders and in promoting good corporate governance. It therefore employs the following best practices:
• Pay for performance – The profit -sharing plan provides annual cash bonuses directly tied to earnings growth. The LTIC grants are comprised of 60% performance -based awards based on the achievement of preset EPS growth and ROE performance targets over a three -year performance period.
• Caps on short and long -term bonuses – Short -term profit -sharing bonuses are capped at 70% of base salary for the CEO and 45% to 50% of base salary for the other named executive officers. The maximum amount of performance -based LTIC awards ultimately earned is capped at 150% of the target award, and no performance -based LTIC awards are earned if performance falls below the threshold achievement level.
• “Clawback” policy – The Company’s Clawback Policy requires the Company to recover all erroneously paid incentive -based compensation to current and former executive officers if the Company must prepare an accounting restatement due to its material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws.
• Stock ownership guidelines – The CEO must receive approval from the Lead Director of the Board before selling shares of the Company’s stock, and the other named executive officers must consult with the CEO and CFO, who further consult with the General Counsel, before selling shares of the Company’s common stock. Except for special circumstances, such as financial hardship, approval to sell would not be given if such sale would result in holdings of less than five times base salary in the case of the CEO and less than three times base salary in the case of the other named executive officers.
• “Double trigger” of LTIC vesting due to change of control – LTIC grants will only result in accelerated vesting if a change of control results in termination of employment.
• No long -term employment agreements – All executives are hired “at -will ” and there are no long -term employment arrangements that provide for compensation beyond an employee’s termination date. The only payments beyond termination date are payments from one of the Company’s retirement plans and allowable vesting of LTIC awards upon certain conditions.
25
Executive Compensation
• No dividends paid on unearned LTIC – There are no dividends paid or accrued on unearned performance -based awards until such time the awards are earned and settled. Any dividends declared on unearned time -based awards will be retained by the Company until such awards are earned.
• No tax gross -ups – There are no automatic tax gross -ups on any form of compensation provided to the CEO or any other executive officer.
• Insider trading and other prohibitions – all named executive officers are expressly covered by the Company’s policies prohibiting insider trading, short selling, and hedging transactions in Company stock. More detailed information about the Cass anti -hedging policy are included in Restrictions on Hedging below.
• No perquisite benefits for named executive officers.
In keeping in mind transparency and best practices for pay -for-performance and shareholder alignment in its executive compensation programs, the Committee has designed executive compensation to avoid rewarding executives for taking excessive and unnecessary risk, providing guaranteed compensation increases and employment terms, rewarding executives for underperformance, and paying dividends on unearned performance -based equity awards.
Committee Review of Executive Compensation
For the past several years the Compensation Committee has retained Pay Governance to conduct an annual review of executive compensation. Pay Governance provides the Committee with external market data on the executive compensation levels, mix and design of companies of a similar size and in similar industries as the Company. During 2023, for pay decisions for fiscal year 2024, the Company reviewed survey and proxy data from a broad range of industries rather than a specific compensation peer group.
Given the Company’s unique operating structure with operations in banking, fintech and business services there has traditionally been a lack of sufficient benchmarks for evaluating the competitiveness of executive compensation at the Company. However, Pay Governance and the Compensation Committee determined that a representative compensation peer group was feasible to develop in 2022 given the increased availability of publicly traded banks with diversified business models (i.e., banks with additional business operations beyond traditional lending) and the emergence of a number of publicly traded fintechs in 2021. The use of a consistent compensation peer group across the named executive officer group was preferred by the Compensation Committee as it provides transparent, line -by-line data for each peer company and the ability to review industry trends and compensation design practices on a year -over-year basis.
As such, Pay Governance developed, and the Compensation Committee approved, a single peer group for evaluating executive compensation in 2022. Initially, 21 U.S. -based , publicly traded companies were selected using the following criteria:
• Banks with Diversified Business Models: Community Banks or Diversified Financial Services companies with revenue generating business operations beyond traditional lending or those with a fintech focus. Financial screening criteria included assets ranging from 0.5x to 4.0x the Company, market capitalization ranging from 0.2x to 5.0x the Company, and a ratio of market capitalization to book value of greater than 1.0x.
• Financial Technology/Business Services: Companies in the Payments/Transaction or Data Processing industries. Financial screening criteria included revenues ranging from 0.5x to 3.75x the Company and market capitalization ranging from 0.2x to 5.0x the Company.
26
Executive Compensation
During 2023, one of the initial peer group selections in the financial technology/business services group was acquired, leaving 20 remaining companies as follows:
|
|
Banks with Diversified Business Models (n=14) |
Financial Technology / Business Services
|
|
|
|
Alerus Financial Corporation |
First Internet Bancorp |
Cantaloupe, Inc. |
||
|
The Bancorp, Inc. |
Heritage Commerce Corp |
Cardlytics, Inc. |
||
|
Business First Bancshares, Inc. |
Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. |
EVERTEC, Inc. |
||
|
Coastal Financial Corporation |
Metropolitan Bank Holdings Corp |
i3 Verticals, Inc. |
||
|
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc. |
MVB Financial Corp. |
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. |
||
|
First Bancorp |
Pathward Financial, Inc. |
Repay Holdings Corporation |
||
|
First Financial Corporation |
Triumph Financial, Inc. |
|||
The compensation peer group consists 70% of banks with diversified business models and 30% of technology/business services companies. The intent was to ensure that the mix was tilted toward the banking -industry companies to recognize the strong alignment with the Company’s unique business model. The Committee intends to continue to monitor the market for additional comparable banks for inclusion in the peer group.
For the review of executive compensation in 2024 in preparation for the Compensation Committee’s 2025 compensation recommendations, Pay Governance provided market data that consisted of annual salary, short -term incentives, and long -term incentives. Pay Governance’s market data was based primarily on proxy -disclosed information from the compensation peers, as detailed above. Size -adjusted survey data published by Mercer was used for staff roles in the absence of robust position -specific data from the compensation peer group.
It is the Compensation Committee’s philosophy that performance, more than evaluating market compensation levels alone, should drive executive compensation levels. The Compensation Committee reviews market data to gain a better understanding of general compensation practices within the market. However, the Compensation Committee takes into account a number of other considerations when making compensation decisions, including individual and Company performance, experience, and scope of responsibilities of the executive officers, desire to retain key personnel and the Company’s objective to maintain internal pay equity.
The Compensation Committee determines base salary and incentive compensation adjustments for the CEO and other executive officers, subject to Board approval. In evaluating compensation adjustments for the executive officers other than the CEO, the Compensation Committee gives consideration to the CEO’s recommendations concerning each executive’s performance and related salary and incentive stock levels. Cash bonuses for the CEO and executive officers are allocated in accordance with the Company’s Board -approved profit -sharing program, as further described in Profit -sharing Bonus below.
Shareholder Feedback on Say on Pay
The Compensation Committee also considered the results of the advisory vote on the “say -on-pay ” proposal presented to shareholders at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Shareholders expressed significant support for the compensation program offered to the Company’s named executive officers, with approximately 96% of votes cast in favor. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee made no direct changes to the overall mix of compensation to named executive officers and the Company’s compensation philosophies generally. The Committee will continue to consider the results of shareholders’ advisory votes on executive compensation when making decisions about the Company’s executive compensation program.
Role of the Compensation Committee’s Independent Consultant
For a number of years, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Pay Governance as a compensation consultant to provide independent counsel and advice on executive compensation matters. In 2024, Pay Governance reviewed the Company’s historical market pricing approach and pay philosophy, assessed the compensation peer group for relevancy, and provided a competitive market assessment of executive compensation design and levels for the Committee’s review.
27
Executive Compensation
Pay Governance attends Compensation Committee meetings upon request. While the Compensation Committee considers input from Pay Governance when making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee’s final decisions reflect many factors and considerations.
The Compensation Committee annually reviews the independence of its compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee considered the Company’s relationship with Pay Governance, assessed the independence of Pay Governance pursuant to Nasdaq and Exchange Act rules, and concluded that there are no conflicts of interest that would preclude Pay Governance from independently representing the Compensation Committee.
Executive Summary of Results
The Company posted revenue of $199.2 million in fiscal 2024, up 0.8% from the prior year, due to increases in processing fees and net interest income, partially offset by a decrease in financial fees and a negative variance in the provision for (release of) credit losses. Operating expenses increased $14.8 million, or 9.3%, primarily as a result of a $3.3 million increase in net periodic pension cost related to the termination of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan and $7.8 million of bad debt expense on a funding receivable related to a facility client. Net income was $19.2 million, and diluted EPS was $1.39 per share, decreases of 36.2% from the prior year.
The Company continues to operate profitably, posting a 0.82% return on average assets and 8.37% return on average equity. The Company’s common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was 13.84% at December 31, 2024, significantly exceeding regulatory requirements. In addition, the Company has maintained exceptional credit quality with non -performing loans to total loans of 0% at December 31, 2024 and no loan charge -offs during the year ended December 31, 2024.
The Company’s solid capital and liquidity positions, combined with ongoing earnings, are expected to continue to allow for investment in strategic opportunities when they become available, in addition to return of capital to shareholders. The Company delivered $23.7 million in dividend payments and share repurchases during 2024. The Company continues to invest in the technology, processes, and people required to support its multi -national customer base.
Elements of Compensation
The key elements of the Company’s executive compensation program include base salary, annual cash bonus awards distributed pursuant to the Company’s profit -sharing program, and LTIC equity awards. A description of these elements and the Company’s benefit plans is included below.
Base Salary
Salaries are established for executive officers by balancing both internal and external factors. Internal equity is determined through comparison with other executives within the Company, taking into account the scope of responsibilities, performance, skills, and experience. Similarly, the Compensation Committee considers external data to validate competitiveness and reasonableness in the marketplace. Considerable weight is given to performance of the individual and his or her associated operating unit, taking into account factors such as revenue growth, cost efficiencies, technological advancements, and leadership. Specific individualized targets and quantitative performance measurements are not utilized. Base salaries are designed to attract and retain high levels of expertise and talent. The Compensation Committee reviews salaries of the CEO and other executive officers at the beginning of each fiscal year. The Compensation Committee determines any adjustments to the CEO’s salary and gives consideration to the CEO’s recommendation regarding adjustment to executive officer salaries, based on the criteria referenced above.
28
Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee believes that base salary increases for 2024 were reflective of the 2023 performance of individuals and individual operating units and competitive forces projected by the external market. The increases in base salary levels for all named executive officers were effective March 31, 2024. The increase in base salaries from 2023 to 2024 were approved as follows:
|
Name |
Salary Prior to
|
Salary On and After
|
||
|
Martin H. Resch |
650,000 |
675,000 |
||
|
Michael J. Normile |
336,000 |
347,750 |
||
|
James M. Cavellier |
315,000 |
324,500 |
||
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
279,000 |
288,000 |
||
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
328,500 |
340,000 |
Profit-Sharing Bonus
The Company is unique in having a company -wide , cash -based profit -sharing program which has been in existence since 1968. These cash bonuses are paid to all eligible employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, according to the profit -sharing program approved by the Board. The purpose of this program is to facilitate the Company’s continued growth and success by providing rewards that are commensurate with achievement, thereby creating an incentive for superior performance and improved results for shareholders. The profit -sharing program is funded and paid semi -annually based on a target of 22.5% of the Company’s profits after taxes. As such, all cash bonuses paid by the Company are capped and are available only when, and to the extent that, the Company is profitable overall. Effective January 1, 2025, the profit -sharing program will be funded and paid semi -annually based on a target of 18.5% of the Company’s profit after taxes as non -exempt employees are no longer eligible for the program. These employees received an increase in base compensation effective January 2025 in an amount commensurate to what they have historically received in profit -sharing .
Total profit -sharing funds are divided into pools to be distributed among various employee groups, including the CEO, executives, exempt and non -exempt staff.
The CEO is eligible to receive a percentage from 0% up to 5.4% of the total profit -sharing funds available, with the actual amount paid, based on a percentage change in NIAT from the prior year, subject to a maximum allowable distribution to the CEO of 70% of his base salary. The target amount for the CEO is set at 45% of base salary based on a change in NIAT of 8% from the prior year. The Compensation Committee believes this formula aligns compensation received by the CEO and Company performance by providing a higher payout for increased profits, based on both an increase in the total profit -sharing pool and an increase in the percentage of the pool received by the CEO, and a lower payout for decreased profits, based on both a decrease in the total profit -sharing pool and a decrease in the percentage of the pool received by the CEO. The Committee believes that the allocation of profit -sharing funds to the CEO maintains internal equity and results in a competitive pay package.
While the size of the executive officer profit -sharing pool is dependent on the overall size of the pool and change in NIAT, the individual distributions have historically been, and for fiscal 2024 were, based on a subjective assessment of each executive’s performance, taking into consideration factors such as performance of each individual and each executive’s associated operating unit. When conducting his evaluation of an executive’s performance, the CEO considers factors such as revenue growth, cost efficiencies and technological advancements within the executive’s operating unit, and leadership skills and other accomplishments during the fiscal year. Consideration is also given to profit -sharing payments that an individual has received in the past as well as those received by other named executive officers, in order to help achieve internal compensation equity.
29
Executive Compensation
The percentages of the total profit -sharing pool available to the CEO and other named executive officers have been set to result in payments that generally correlate to targeted salary percentages for the CEO and other named executive officers. The target percentage of base salary to be received by the CEO at target change in NIAT of 8% was 45% and could range from 0% to a maximum of 70%. The target percentage of salary at target change in NIAT for the other executive officers was 40%, with a range of 0% to a maximum of 45% in the case of Mr. Cavellier and Mr. Schuckman; and 0% to a maximum of 50% for Messrs. Normile and Erdbruegger. The targeted percentage salary ranges for the CEO and other named executive officers have, for the most part, been in place since the Company’s profit -sharing program was established. These ranges were established based on the following factors: (i) the goal to maintain internal equity that reflects the responsibilities of the position relative to other positions within the Company; (ii) the objective to provide incentive compensation that is adequate to attract and retain talent, validated through the Company’s recruitment efforts and periodic review of general marketplace survey data; and (iii) the desire to minimize overly risky compensation practices in line with the Company’s conservative risk profile.
The target salary percentage payouts and the distributions made to the CEO and other named executive officers are regularly reviewed by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the factors noted above. The Compensation Committee has determined that fiscal 2024 profit -sharing payments resulting from the methodology described above fall in line with the Company’s compensation philosophies and objectives and reflect the Company’s emphasis on performance -based compensation.
Fiscal 2024 bonuses were paid in August 2024 and February 2025.
The Board approved an adjustment to NIAT in 2024 for the one -time expense related to the termination of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan. The pre -tax expense of $3.5 million resulted in an after -tax adjustment to NIAT of $2.6 million. As such, NIAT for 2024 was determined to be $21.8 million which is reported net income of $19.2 million plus the pension adjustment of $2.6 million. See attached Annex A to this proxy statement for a reconciliation of the “As Adjusted” results to the Company’s GAAP results found in our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10 -K for purposes of Regulation G adopted by the SEC.
NIAT for 2024 compared to 2023 was a decrease of 27.6%, resulting in the CEO position receiving a distribution of 2.4% of the profit -sharing pool for the year, with the payment made in August 2024 based on the funds available through June 30, 2024 and the balance paid in February 2025 based on the funds available for the year ended December 31, 2024. The total profit -sharing pool for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $4,914,000 and resulted in the CEO position receiving a total 2024 profit -sharing payment of $117,000, or 17.5% of 2024 base salary.
The total amount of the executive officer profit -sharing pool was also based on a 27.6% decrease in NIAT for the year ended December 31, 2024 over the year ended December 31, 2023, and equaled 3.6% of the total profit -sharing pool. A payment was made in August 2024 based on the results through June 30, 2024, with the balance paid in February 2025 based on the results for the year ended December 31, 2024. As noted above, the amount of the executive officer profit -sharing pool allocated to individual executive officers, other than the CEO, primarily results from the change in NIAT. In addition, individual distributions were ultimately based on a performance evaluation, conducted by the CEO, considering internal equity among the executive officers and other individual performance factors, including:
• Martin H. Resch: leadership and growth of the Company’s Banking Services, Transportation Information Services and Expense Management business units.
• Michael J. Normile: overall stewardship of corporate financial processes, reporting, and controls.
• Dwight D. Erdbruegger: ongoing growth of the Company’s banking subsidiary while maintaining excellent credit quality.
• James M. Cavellier: leadership and ongoing development of the Company’s technology vision and strategic plan to ensure effective, efficient and secure systems and technologies.
• Matthew S. Schuckman: overall stewardship of effective risk management and compliance.
Profit -sharing awards for 2024 represented an average of 13.6% of base pay for the named executive officers, other than the CEO.
30
Executive Compensation
A summary of the average percentage of base pay paid in profit sharing as compared to the average change in NIAT is as follows:
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
The objectives of the LTIC program are to provide an incentive which aligns executive officers’ interests with those of shareholders, assist in recruiting, encourage retention, and reward executive officers for the Company’s success.
LTIC has historically been awarded to various members of the Company’s management team, including all named executive officers, in accordance with the Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock and Performance Compensation Plan (the Prior Plan). The Prior Plan terminated in accordance with its terms on April 17, 2023, and shareholders approved the new Omnibus Plan at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. LTIC awarded from April 2023 onward is pursuant to the Omnibus Plan.
The Committee believes that time -based awards reinforce the Company’s long -term objectives, serve as a retention incentive and reward the appreciation of the Company’s common stock price. The Committee believes that performance -based awards incentivize the named executive officers to meet or exceed the Company’s long -term ROE and EPS targets.
The value of target LTIC awards is set at 125% of base salary for the CEO and 70% of base salary for the other named executive officers. The target values are based, in part, on market data provided by Pay Governance and the Compensation Committee also considered historical grant levels, overall TDC targets and the Company’s desire to incentivize performance. The number of awards granted to an executive officer is determined by dividing the officer’s target LTIC award dollar value by the fair market value of the Company’s common stock using the closing stock price as reported on the Nasdaq on the grant date. Of the resulting number of shares, 40% of the awards is issued in the form of restricted stock or restricted stock units (RSUs) that cliff vest in three years from the date of grant, and 60% of the award is issued in the form of performance -based restricted stock or RSUs that vests three years from the date of grant with amounts earned, if any, based on the Company’s achievement of EPS and ROE performance targets for the prospective three -year performance period. The ultimate number of performance -based awards earned will range from 0% to 150% of the target award based on the Company’s achievement of EPS and ROE performance goals, with no performance -based awards being earned if threshold performance targets are not met. In the most recent several years, LTIC awards have been made in the form of restricted stock, subject to a participant’s election to receive the time -based portion in RSUs if eligible to make the retirement election (described below). In 2025, and in consultant with the Company’s compensation consultant, both the time- and performance -based portions of the LTIC awards were made in the form of RSUs.
31
Executive Compensation
The Committee selected growth of EPS and average ROE as the basis for awarding performance -based restricted stock because these are two key measurements used by the Company to measure the long -term growth and strength of the Company. The target levels of performance for each measurement were established based on the ongoing performance level that is expected by the Board, with the threshold representing the minimum acceptable level to earn any additional compensation and the maximum as the level of performance that would be considered an exceptional achievement. These pre -established targets are scheduled for a comprehensive review at least every three years and may be reviewed and adjusted earlier if current business conditions dictate a review is needed.
The performance goals for the 2024 performance -based grants made in January 2024 are as follows, and performance -based restricted stock will be earned if and to the extent the goals are met at the end of the three -year performance period ending on December 31, 2026:
|
Factor |
Percentage of Target Performance-Based Shares Earned |
|||
|
50% |
100% |
150% |
||
|
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
||
|
EPS annual growth |
—% |
8% |
16% |
|
|
Average ROE |
9% |
13% |
17% |
|
The EPS growth goal, as shown in the table above, represents a compounding annual growth rate over a base year EPS, which is the year preceding the beginning of the three -year performance period. The EPS performance goals established for each three -year performance period will be presented as a dollar value based on these EPS growth percentages. The ROE goal presented in the table above will be based on the average ROE over the three -year performance period.
To provide an equal balance between profitability and growth, each factor will be weighted 50% to determine the total percentage of performance -based restricted stock earned. For each factor, target performance would result in 100% being earned related to that factor, performance at threshold would result in 50% being earned and maximum or higher performance would result in 150% being earned. Any performance below threshold would result in 0% earned related to that performance factor. Vesting percentages for performance that falls between threshold and target or target and maximum will be prorated between the respective vesting percentages. The percentage earned for each factor will then be multiplied by the 50% weighting and added together to determine the total percentage earned. The number of performance -based shares ultimately earned will then be determined by multiplying the number of performance -based shares granted at the beginning of the performance period by the total percentage earned, rounded to the nearest whole share.
Achievement of performance goals for performance -based restricted stock shall be determined based on generally accepted accounting principles and may be adjusted for any one -time unusual or non -recurring items that the Compensation Committee has determined, and Board of Directors has approved, as unusual and/or non -recurring .
The terms of the LTIC awards are set forth in a restricted stock or RSU award agreement entered into with each executive officer at the time of grant. Time -based restricted stock carries voting and dividend accrual rights and cliff vests on the three -year anniversary of the grant date. Time -based RSUs are settled in shares of common stock on the three -year anniversary of the grant date, have no voting rights, and dividend equivalents accumulate over the restriction period and will be paid upon vesting. In the event of disability or death of the named executive officer, time -based restricted stock and RSU awards vest immediately and performance -based restricted stock awards and RSUs vest under the original terms of the agreement. There are no dividends paid or accrued on unearned performance -based awards until such time as the awards are earned and settled. In the event of a change of control and termination of service of the named executive officer, time -based and performance -based restricted stock and RSU awards vest immediately with performance -based awards vesting at the target performance level.
For all LTIC grants prior to January 2025, the LTIC program contained a retirement provision, which allowed participants age 65 or older, with at least five years of service, to continue to vest in previously awarded grants after retirement. Due to this provision, and to delay the early taxation of the time -based restricted stock, the Company allowed participants who were age 62 or older, and would have 5 years of service upon vesting, to elect to receive time -based RSUs in lieu of the time -based restricted stock. Mr. Erdbruegger was the only named executive officer eligible to make this election for 2024 LTIC time -based awards. Effective with the 2025 LTIC grant, all participants receive both the time and performance -based components of the LTIC awards in the form of RSUs, regardless of age. The Compensation Committee adopted the “Rule of 65” for RSUs, which is more fully described in the section “—Post -Employment Payments” below. As of the time of the 2025 LTIC grants, the only named executive officer who has satisfied the Rule of 65 is Mr. Erdbruegger.
32
Executive Compensation
The Company does not allow the grant of awards to be timed with the release of material non -public information such that it would have an effect on the exercise price that would benefit the executive. The dollar value of LTIC awards granted to named executive officers and other eligible participants in 2024 was approved by independent Board members. Generally, this occurs at the January Board meeting and the grant date is approximately two days subsequent to the January Board meeting.
Outstanding Performance-Based LTIC Awards at Fiscal Year-End
At December 31, 2024, performance -based LTIC awards with respect to the 2023 to 2025 and 2024 to 2026 performance periods were still outstanding and have not yet been earned. Grants for these named executive officers are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan -Based Awards table in the year of grant. The performance -based restricted stock grants relating to the 2023 to 2025 and 2024 to 2026 performance periods vest based on cumulative EPS goals and average ROE goals as described in this Long -Term Incentive Compensation section of the CDA. If earned, these LTIC grants will be paid in the form of immediately vested shares of common stock.
Stock Vested in 2024
Performance -based LTIC awards of restricted stock were granted on January 28, 2021 vested on January 26, 2024, following the end of the three -year performance period on December 31, 2023. Actual results for EPS and ROE are as follows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively, that determine the vesting percentage of the performance -based restricted shares.
|
Performance Measurement |
2021 Actual |
2022 Actual |
2023 Actual |
||
|
EPS annual growth |
$2.00 |
$2.53 |
$2.18 |
||
|
Average ROE |
11.29% |
16.53% |
14.24% |
Actual cumulative EPS and average ROE for these periods compared to the levels set in 2021 at threshold, target, and maximum performance, along with the achievement percentage for these metrics are as follows:
|
Actual |
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
Achievement |
||
|
Cumulative EPS |
$6.71 |
$5.19 |
$6.07 |
$7.04 |
133.0% |
|
|
Average ROE |
14.02% |
7% |
11% |
15% |
137.8% |
|
|
Total Achievement |
135.4% |
As the cumulative EPS and average ROE metrics are each weighted at 50%, the total achievement for the 2021 performance -based LTIC awards resulted in a percentage of 135.4% of the target awards.
The number of shares of both time -based and performance -based awards that vested on January 26, 2024 for each named executive officer, adjusted for stock dividends during the performance period, are as follows:
|
Name |
Vested Time-Based
|
|
||||
|
Target Granted |
Vested at 135.4% |
|||||
|
Martin H. Resch |
2,749 |
4,124 |
5,584 |
|||
|
Michael J. Normile |
1,890 |
2,835 |
3,839 |
|||
|
James M. Cavellier |
1,997 |
2,995 |
4,055 |
|||
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
1,001 |
1,502 |
2,034 |
|||
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
2,079 |
3,119 |
4,223 |
|||
33
Executive Compensation
Clawback Policy
In October 2023, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors approved and adopted the Cass Information Systems, Inc. Clawback Policy in compliance with the SEC and Nasdaq listing rules. The Clawback Policy is administered by the Compensation Committee and requires the Company, subject to certain narrow exceptions permitted by the Nasdaq listing rules, to recover from covered executive officers erroneously awarded incentive -based compensation in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to material noncompliance with federal securities laws. Incentive -based compensation that is “received” during the three fiscal years preceding the restatement is subject to recoupment, effective from October 2, 2023 forward.
A copy of the Clawback Policy was filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10 -K for fiscal 2023.
Restrictions on Hedging
The Company’s restrictions on hedging common stock of the Company are incorporated within the Insider Trading Policy, which restricts directors, executive officers and other senior level employees who have access to material nonpublic information from engaging in short -term transactions involving the Company’s common stock. This includes short sales, purchasing on margin, or engaging in any transactions to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s common stock at any time. In addition, pursuant to the Company’s stock ownership guidelines, no executive officer may sell shares of the Company’s common stock without prior approval of the CEO and CFO, and in the case of sales of shares by the CEO the approval of the Lead Director of the Board is required.
Defined Contribution Retirement Plan
Cass Information Systems, Inc. 401(k) Plan
The Company provides defined contribution retirement benefits to eligible employees, including named executive officers, under the Cass Information Systems, Inc. 401(k) Plan. Eligible employees may enter the plan at the first of the month following one month of service. Employees may voluntarily defer the maximum level allowed by the IRS, which was $23,000 for 2024, plus an additional $7,500 catch -up contribution for employees age 50 or older.
All employees eligible for the 401(k) Plan receive the same 3% contribution and 50% of the first 6% of employee contributions. All employee contributions vest immediately. Company contributions vest for each employee on the employee’s third anniversary of employment with the Company.
Post-Employment Payments
Named executive officers do not have employment agreements, nor are there any provisions for payments following or in connection with any termination of service or change of control, other than for provisions that allow LTIC awards to vest or continue to vest upon termination of service to the Company in certain instances in accordance with the terms of their respective award agreements. The equity compensation termination benefits provided to the named executive officers upon retirement do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of executive officers compared to the benefits offered to all other plan participants.
For LTIC awards made in 2024 and prior, terms governing a participant’s post -employment payments provide for forfeiture of awards upon the termination of a participant’s employment except as follows: (i) for time -based restricted stock and RSUs, awards vest in whole upon termination of a participant’s employment due to death, disability, or termination following a change of control, and awards continue vesting in accordance with the terms of the agreement upon retirement for participants who complete one year of service following the grant date and who are 65 years of age with five years of service (“Normal Retirement”); and (ii) for performance -based restricted stock, awards continue to vest in accordance with the terms of the agreement upon termination of a participant’s employment due to death, disability, or Normal Retirement, and awards vest immediately at target achievement level upon termination of a participant’s employment following a change of control.
34
Executive Compensation
For LTIC awards made in 2025, which were made in the form of RSUs, terms governing a participant’s post -employment payments provide for forfeiture of awards upon the termination of a participant’s employment (or, for employees who are also directors, termination of the later of employment or Board service) except as follows: (i) for time -based RSUs, awards vest in whole upon termination of a participant’s employment due to death, disability, or termination following a change of control, and awards continue vesting in accordance with the terms of the agreement upon retirement for participants who both remain in service to the Company on the last day of the calendar year in which the LTIC award was made and who satisfy the “Rule of 65” (“Rule of 65 Retirement”); and (ii) for performance -based RSUs, awards continue to vest in accordance with the terms of the agreement upon termination of a participant’s employment due to death, disability, or Rule of 65 Retirement (in the case of a Rule of 65 Retirement, the amount of performance -based RSUs that vest will be pro -rated for the participant’s time of service), and awards vest immediately at target achievement level upon termination of a participant’s employment following a change of control.
A participant will satisfy the “Rule of 65” if the employee is at least 60 years of age, and the sum of the employee’s whole years of age plus whole years of service equals at least 65. The Compensation Committee adopted the Rule of 65 to provide a further incentive for long -term employment, as well as to recognize that RSUs are part of annual compensation and, if an employee retires after satisfying certain age and service requirements, then he or she should get the benefit of outstanding RSUs. With respect to performance -based RSUs, the Rule of 65 applies to waive any continuing service requirement but does not waive any performance condition. The Compensation Committee believes that the benefits available under the Rule of 65 are customary and reasonable components of the Company’s compensation program, and it retains discretion to modify the terms and conditions applicable to the Rule of 65, including by applying it to restricted stock awards that may be issued.
The value of restricted stock or RSU awards that would continue to vest are reflected in the table Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year -End table provided later in this Proxy Statement. These amounts represent the value of payments a named executive officer would have received due to retirement, resignation, death or disability, or following a change of control if their employment would have terminated on the last day of the fiscal 2024. Messrs. Resch, Normile, and Schuckman are not yet eligible for the vesting of LTIC awards after retirement, as they have not met the five -year service requirement.
Federal Income Tax Deductibility Limitations
While the Compensation Committee takes into consideration the tax consequences to employees and the Company when considering types of awards and other compensation granted to executives and directors, the accounting and tax treatment of compensation generally has not been a factor in determining the amount of compensation for the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee’s primary objective is to provide compensation programs to attract and retain a high level of talented leadership, reward performance in accordance with results, provide an incentive for future performance and align Company executives’ long -term interests with those of the shareholders and therefore designs programs to achieve those objectives, even if such compensation is potentially not deductible to the Company for tax purposes.
35
Executive Compensation
CEO Pay Ratio
The Compensation Committee believes executive pay must be both internally equitable and externally competitive to attract and retain the talent necessary to produce exceptional financial results and value for shareholders. Cass is committed to internal pay equity and periodically reviews pay data to ensure it is both internally equitable and in line with similar positions in the external market. Due to the Company’s nature of business, a large portion of the employee population is clerical and administrative with approximately 20% of employees holding part -time positions and working less than 30 hours per week.
In calculating the CEO pay ratio, pursuant to Item 402(u) of Regulation S -K , companies are required to disclose the ratio of the CEO’s compensation to that of the median employee. The SEC permits the Company to identify its median employee once every three years provided that it reasonably believes there has been no change in its employee population or compensation arrangements that would significantly affect the pay ratio disclosure. The Company used the following methodology to identify the Company’s median employee:
• Compensation data was compiled as of the last pay period in November 2022 and reflects all cash compensation paid for the period ended November 30, 2022, including payments pursuant to the Company’s profit -sharing program.
• The compensation data represents all U.S. employees paid for the period ended November 30, 2022. This data excludes non -U .S. employees, as these employees make up less than 5% of the Company’s total employee count.
• For employees hired or terminated during the year, compensation was annualized as of November 30, 2022 by taking total regular pay and overtime pay divided by the number of days actually worked during the period, multiplying this amount by the 238 days paid through November 30, 2022 and adding additional compensation not related to hours worked, such as any cash bonuses or other cash or like -cash awards paid during the year.
• No adjustments were made to part -time employees’ total compensation except annualizing pay for part -time employees hired during the year, as explained above.
• The total cash compensation by employee was then ranked from highest to lowest for all 1,357 employees, excluding the CEO. The median employee was determined to be the employee that ranked number 677 in order from lowest to highest in total cash compensation paid in 2022 for the period ended November 30, 2022.
• The total annual compensation of the median employee was calculated in the same manner as that of the CEO for disclosure in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement.
There have been no changes in the Company’s employee population, employee compensation arrangements, or the median employee’s circumstances that the Company reasonably believes would result in a significant change in the pay ratio disclosure. As such, as permitted under SEC rules, the Company is utilizing the same median employee for the pay ratio for fiscal 2024 by examining the annual total compensation applying updated compensation data for 2024.
The Company provides the following with respect to the pay ratio for fiscal 2024:
• The median of annual total compensation of all employees of Cass for fiscal 2024 other than Mr. Resch was $46,777;
• The annual total compensation of Mr. Resch during 2024 was $1,673,109 (see the Summary Compensation Table); and
• Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all Company employees is 35.8:1.
LTIC awards are an element of compensation provided to the CEO that is not included in compensation paid to the median employee. LTIC awards made in 2024 are included at grant date value and will not be earned until 2027, if at all, 60% of which are eligible to be earned only upon the achievement of performance goals.
36
Executive Compensation
Post-Fiscal Year Compensation Actions
Executive Compensation Comparative Data
In 2024, the Compensation Committee performed a review of executive compensation. As part of the review process, the Compensation Committee retained Pay Governance to provide comparative data on cash and total executive compensation. Data reviewed was from (i) the Financial Services sector, including the Banking industry, and (ii) the Services Sector, including the Business Services industry. Consistent with prior years and the Company’s intent not to engage in benchmarking, the Compensation Committee did not rely solely on comparative data, but did consider such elements when exercising its own judgment in determining 2025 compensation.
Base Salary
Base salary increases for 2025 were approved in January 2025 based on the factors discussed herein, including overall performance of individuals, individual operating units, corporate earnings, and overall corporate growth over the past several years. Such base salary increases were approved as follows:
|
Name |
Salary Prior to
|
Salary on and After
|
||
|
Martin H. Resch |
675,000 |
688,500 |
||
|
Michael J. Normile |
347,750 |
358,183 |
||
|
James M. Cavellier |
324,500 |
332,613 |
||
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
288,000 |
296,640 |
||
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
340,000 |
350,200 |
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Vesting of 2022 LTIC Awards
The LTIC awards granted on January 27, 2022 cliff -vested on January 24, 2025 after the three -year restriction period elapsed. Actual results for EPS and ROE are as follows for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively, that determined the vesting percentage of the performance -based restricted shares.
|
Performance Measurement |
2022 Actual |
2023 Actual |
2024 Actual (1) |
|
|
EPS annual growth |
$2.53 |
$2.18 |
$1.58 |
|
|
Average ROE |
16.53% |
14.24% |
9.51% |
(1) Actual EPS and ROE for 2024 were $1.39 and 8.37%, respectively. The Board approved an adjustment to EPS and ROE in 2024 for the one -time expense related to the termination of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan. The pre -tax expense of $3.5 million resulted in an after -tax adjustment to net income of $2.6 million. As such, adjusted net income for 2024 was determined to be $21.8 million which is reported net income of $19.2 million plus the pension adjustment of $2.6 million. Taking into account this adjustment, EPS and ROE for 2024 were adjusted to $1.58 and 9.51%, respectively, for the purpose of determining the value of the 2022 LTIC award. See attached Annex A to this proxy statement for a reconciliation of the “As Adjusted” results shown in the table below to our GAAP results found in our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10 -K for purposes of Regulation G adopted by the SEC.
37
Executive Compensation
Actual cumulative EPS and average ROE for these periods compared to the levels set in 2022 at threshold, target, and maximum performance, along with the achievement percentage for these metrics are as follows:
|
Actual |
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
Achievement |
||
|
Cumulative EPS |
$6.29 |
$6.00 |
$7.01 |
$8.13 |
67.8% |
|
|
Average ROE |
13.43% |
7% |
11% |
15% |
130.3% |
|
|
Target Achievement |
99.1% |
As the cumulative EPS and average ROE metrics are each weighted at 50%, the total achievement for the 2022 LTIC awards resulted in a payout percentage of 99.1% of the target awards. The number of shares that vested on January 24 2025 for each named executive officer are as follows:
|
Name |
Vested Time-Based
|
|
||
|
Target Granted |
Vested at 99.1% |
|||
|
Martin H. Resch |
4,851 |
7,276 |
7,211 |
|
|
Michael J. Normile |
2,264 |
3,396 |
3,365 |
|
|
James M. Cavellier |
2,158 |
3,236 |
3,207 |
|
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
1,910 |
2,865 |
2,839 |
|
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
2,246 |
3,369 |
3,339 |
|
Grant of 2025 LTIC Awards
The LTIC awards made in January 2025 were made pursuant to the Omnibus Plan and were comprised of 40% time -based restricted shares or RSUs and 60% performance -based RSUs. The LTIC awards made in January 2025 were made pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. In consultation with the Company’s compensation consultant, the 2025 LTIC awards were made in the form of RSUs rather than restricted stock. Both the time -based RSUs and the performance -based RSUs are scheduled to cliff vest three years from the grant date, subject to the terms and conditions of the awards. The number of performance -based RSUs vesting will vary in an amount from 0% to 150% of the amount awarded based on the achievement of pre -established ROE and EPS performance goals over the three -year performance period from January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2027. The awards were granted on January 23, 2025 and were valued using the closing stock price as reported on the Nasdaq on the grant date of $41.46.
The performance goals for the 2025 performance -based grants are as follows, and performance -based RSUs will be earned if and to the extent the goals are met at the end of the three -year performance period ending on December 31, 2027:
|
Factor |
Percentage of Target Performance-Based RSUs Earned |
|||
|
50% |
100% |
150% |
||
|
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
||
|
EPS annual growth |
—% |
8% |
16% |
|
|
Average ROE |
9% |
13% |
17% |
|
The target awards granted on January 23, 2025 to each named executive officer are detailed below.
|
Name |
Time-Based RSUs |
Target Number of
|
|
|
Martin H. Resch |
8,303 |
12,455 |
|
|
Michael J. Normile |
2,419 |
3,628 |
|
|
James M. Cavellier |
2,246 |
3,369 |
|
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
2,003 |
3,005 |
|
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
2,365 |
3,548 |
38
Executive Compensation
Compensation Committee Report
In the performance of its oversight function for the year ended December 31, 2024, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S -K . Based upon such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
James J. Lindemann, Chairman
Ann W. Marr
Joseph D. Rupp
Franklin D. Wicks, Jr.
Executive Officers
Following are the names, ages and positions held by the Company’s current executive officers followed by information on compensation received or earned by the Company’s named executive officers during the periods presented.
Martin H. Resch , 59, President and CEO. Additional information on Mr. Resch can be found in the section “Election of Directors” contained herein.
Michael J. Normile , 49, Executive Vice President and CFO. Mr. Normile, CPA, joined the Company in January 2021 as Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance and was named Executive Vice President and CFO on March 4, 2021. Prior to joining Cass, he worked for FB Corporation/First Bank for 13 years serving as the Controller starting in 2007 and the CFO since 2015. Prior to FB Corporation/First Bank, Mr. Normile spent nine years working for KPMG, LLP and was a Senior Manager in the financial services audit practice.
Dwight D. Erdbruegger , 66, President, Cass Commercial Bank. Mr. Erdbruegger joined the Company in this role in 2018, after a 31 -year career in commercial banking, the last 15 years spent with Commerce Bank. Most recently he served as chairman of CBIEF, the equipment finance subsidiary of Commerce Bank. Mr. Erdbruegger was also chief administrative officer for Commerce Bank East Group, with offices in Missouri, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee.
James M. Cavellier , 57, Executive Vice President and CIO. Mr. Cavellier joined the Company in this role in 2018. Prior to joining the Company, he worked for Comerica Bank since 2001 holding various technology leadership positions ranging from strategic technology planning to operational responsibility for all technology across the U.S. Most recently, Mr. Cavellier was a domain chief information officer for payment and wealth management technologies. Prior to Comerica Bank, Mr. Cavellier held technology leadership positions with The Auto Club Group, Ernst Young, LLP, and Electronic Data Systems.
Matthew S. Schuckman , 51, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Schuckman joined the company in this role in 2020, after a 20 -year career as a commercial and transactional attorney with the St. Louis office of Armstrong Teasdale LLP.
39
Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
The following table includes the annual and long -term compensation of the named executive officers for all services rendered in all capacities to the Company for each respective fiscal year.
|
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary
|
Non-Equity
|
Stock
|
All Other
|
Total
|
|
Martin H. Resch
|
2024 |
668,774 |
117,000 |
843,725 |
43,610 |
1,673,109 |
|
2023 |
602,423 |
146,300 |
729,978 |
38,711 |
1,517,412 |
|
|
2022 |
475,385 |
243,000 |
479,987 |
30,880 |
1,229,252 |
|
|
Michael J. Normile
|
2024 |
344,824 |
53,989 |
243,418 |
28,427 |
670,658 |
|
2023 |
332,000 |
67,761 |
235,161 |
31,491 |
666,413 |
|
|
2022 |
315,000 |
154,000 |
224,023 |
27,417 |
720,440 |
|
|
James M. Cavellier
|
2024 |
322,134 |
39,888 |
227,119 |
27,976 |
617,117 |
|
2023 |
312,500 |
63,526 |
220,494 |
26,872 |
623,392 |
|
|
2022 |
301,375 |
114,388 |
213,495 |
24,618 |
653,876 |
|
|
Matthew S. Schuckman
|
2024 |
285,759 |
28,236 |
201,608 |
26,525 |
542,128 |
|
2023 |
276,750 |
56,265 |
195,315 |
25,076 |
553,406 |
|
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger
|
2024 |
337,136 |
52,786 |
237,970 |
28,294 |
656,186 |
|
2023 |
325,750 |
66,248 |
229,930 |
27,161 |
649,089 |
|
|
2022 |
313,750 |
134,938 |
222,242 |
24,874 |
695,804 |
(1) These amounts represent distributions under the Company’s profit -sharing program as further described in the CDA section contained herein.
(2) These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for restricted stock and RSU awards granted in fiscal 2024, fiscal 2023, and fiscal 2022. These amounts do not represent the actual amounts paid to or realized by the named executive officer for these awards. Fiscal 2022, 2023, and 2024 grants consisted of 40% time -based restricted stock or RSUs, which vest in total on the third anniversary of the grant date, and 60% performance -based restricted stock that will be earned based on cumulative three -year EPS growth and average ROE goals. In all fiscal years reported, the time -based portion of the award was made in restricted stock to Messrs. Resch, Normile, Cavellier, and Schuckman and in RSUs to Messrs. Brunngraber and Erdbruegger. The fiscal 2022 performance -based grants may be earned based on the achievement of goals for fiscal 2022 -2024 ; the fiscal 2023 performance -based grants may be earned based on the achievement of goals for fiscal 2023 -2025 ; and the fiscal 2024 performance -based grants may be earned based on the achievement of goals for fiscal 2024 -2026 , as discussed in the CDA. The reported grant date fair value of the fiscal 2022, 2023 and 2024 awards assume that the performance -based restricted stock will be earned at the target achievement level per the instructions to Item 402(c) of Regulation S -K . See Note 11 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements filed as part of its Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2024 for a discussion of the assumptions used in the valuation of awards. The grant date fair value of the performance -based restricted stock awards granted in 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively, for each named executive officer assuming that the maximum level of performance conditions is achieved is as follows: Mr. Resch - $431,976, $656,971, and $759,352; Mr. Normile - $201,621, $211,645 and $219,103; Mr. Cavellier - $192,121, $198,445, and $204,420; and Mr. Erdbruegger - $200,018, $206,951, and $214,186. The grant date fair value of the performance -based restricted stock awards granted in 2023 and 2024 for Mr. Schuckman assuming that the maximum level of performance conditions is achieved is $175,784 and $181,434, respectively.
40
Executive Compensation
(3) See All Other Compensation table below for details of the dividends paid or accrued on time -based restricted stock awards, and the Company’s matching contributions paid to the Company’s 401(k) Plan on behalf of each named executive officer for fiscal 2024.
(4) Mr. Resch’s 2023 reported information also reflects compensation earned by Mr. Resch in his role as COO from January 1, 2023 to April 18, 2023, the effective date of his current CEO position.
All Other Compensation Table
The following table includes all other compensation received by executive offers during fiscal year 2024.
|
Name |
Matching
|
Dividends Paid
|
Total All Other
|
|
|
Martin H. Resch |
20,700 |
22,910 |
43,610 |
|
|
Michael J. Normile |
20,700 |
7,727 |
28,427 |
|
|
James M. Cavellier |
20,700 |
7,276 |
27,976 |
|
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
20,077 |
6,448 |
26,525 |
|
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
20,700 |
7,594 |
28,294 |
41
Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information regarding all plan -based awards that were made to the named executive officers during 2024. Disclosure is provided on a separate line for each grant or award made during the year. The information supplements the values of awards presented in the Summary Compensation table above.
|
Name |
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
All Other
|
Grant
|
||||
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Max
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Max
|
||||
|
Martin H. Resch |
1/25/24 |
5,715 |
11,430 |
17,145 |
506,235 |
||||
|
1/25/24 |
7,620 |
337,490 |
|||||||
|
8/9/24 |
74,400 |
||||||||
|
2/7/25 |
42,600 |
||||||||
|
Michael J. Normile |
1/25/24 |
1,649 |
3,298 |
4,947 |
146,068 |
||||
|
1/25/24 |
2,198 |
97,349 |
|||||||
|
8/9/24 |
35,340 |
||||||||
|
2/7/25 |
18,649 |
||||||||
|
James M. Cavellier |
1/25/24 |
1,539 |
3,077 |
4,616 |
136,280 |
||||
|
1/25/24 |
2,051 |
90,839 |
|||||||
|
8/9/24 |
29,037 |
||||||||
|
2/7/25 |
10,851 |
||||||||
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
1/25/24 |
1,366 |
2,731 |
4,097 |
120,956 |
||||
|
1/25/24 |
1,821 |
80,652 |
|||||||
|
8/9/24 |
18,469 |
||||||||
|
2/7/25 |
9,767 |
||||||||
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
1/25/24 |
1,612 |
3,224 |
4,836 |
142,791 |
||||
|
1/25/24 |
2,149 |
95,179 |
|||||||
|
8/9/24 |
34,553 |
||||||||
|
2/7/25 |
18,233 |
||||||||
(1) Target represents amounts earned and paid on the dates reported pursuant to the Company’s profit -sharing program, as discussed in the CDA.
(2) Represents performance -based restricted stock awards granted pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Omnibus Plan. Performance -based restricted stock awards earned, if any, will vest in full on January 25, 2027, only to the extent the Company achieves certain EPS and ROE targets for the three -year performance period ending December 31, 2026. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long -Term Compensation” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Post -Employment Payments” for a discussion of the performance measures, voting and dividend rights, and other vesting conditions applicable to these awards.
(3) For Mr. Erdbruegger, represents time -based RSUs and for Messrs. Resch, Normile, Cavellier, and Schuckman, represents shares of time -based restricted stock. January 2024 time -based awards were granted pursuant to the terms of the Omnibus Plan. Time -based RSUs and restricted shares granted on January 25, 2024 will vest in full on January 25, 2027. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long -Term Compensation” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Post -Employment Payments” for a discussion of the voting and dividend rights and other vesting conditions applicable to these awards.
(4) The grant date fair value is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, is based on the target number of performance -based restricted stock, as applicable, and is calculated using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant of $44.29 for grants made on January 25, 2024.
42
Executive Compensation
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth outstanding equity awards held by each named executive officer as of December 31, 2024.
|
Name |
Stock Awards |
||||
|
Number of
|
Market
|
Equity
|
Equity
|
||
|
Martin H. Resch |
18,934 |
774,590 |
28,401 |
1,161,885 |
|
|
Michael J. Normile |
6,386 |
261,251 |
9,580 |
391,918 |
|
|
James M. Cavellier |
6,013 |
245,992 |
9,019 |
368,967 |
|
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
5,329 |
218,009 |
7,993 |
326,994 |
|
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
6,276 |
256,751 |
9,415 |
385,168 |
|
(1) Represents time -based restricted stock and RSU awards issued pursuant to the Company’s Prior Plan and the Omnibus Plan. The reported amount represents the annual LTIC awards for all named executive officers and, in the case of Mr. Resch, an additional LTIC award made to him in 2023 in consideration of his transition to CEO to align his annual LTIC award with his role as CEO. The awards cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. The vesting dates for such awards are as follows:
|
Name |
Vesting Date |
Number of Shares
|
Number of RSUs |
||
|
Martin H. Resch |
1/24/2025 |
4,851 |
— |
||
|
1/26/2026 |
4,336 |
||||
|
4/17/2026 |
2,127 |
— |
|||
|
1/25/2027 |
7,620 |
||||
|
Michael J. Normile |
1/24/2025 |
2,264 |
— |
||
|
1/26/2026 |
1,924 |
— |
|||
|
1/25/2027 |
2,198 |
— |
|||
|
James M. Cavellier |
1/24/2025 |
2,158 |
— |
||
|
1/26/2026 |
1,804 |
— |
|||
|
1/25/2027 |
2,051 |
— |
|||
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
1/24/2025 |
1,910 |
— |
||
|
1/26/2026 |
1,598 |
— |
|||
|
1/25/2027 |
1,821 |
— |
|||
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
1/26/2025 |
— |
2,246 |
||
|
1/24/2026 |
— |
1,881 |
|||
|
1/25/2027 |
— |
2,149 |
(2) Value based on $40.91 per share, which was the closing market price of the Company’s common stock reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2024.
(3) Represents unearned performance -based restricted stock awards granted pursuant to the Company’s Prior Plan and the Omnibus Plan. The number of unearned performance -based shares and the corresponding market value of such shares has been calculated in accordance with the instructions to Item 402(f) of Regulation S -K and related SEC guidance based on the achievement level that exceeds the performance of the last completed fiscal year over which performance is measured. Because the three -year performance
43
Executive Compensation
period ended December 31, 2024 resulted in payouts of performance -based awards below the target level, the number of shares and corresponding market value in the table above represent the target number of performance -based shares that can be earned at the end of the applicable three -year performance period. The awards were granted on January 27, 2022, January 26, 2023, April 20, 2023 (in the case of Mr. Resch only), and January 25, 2024. Amounts ultimately earned will be based on the achievement of certain EPS and ROE targets over the applicable three -year performance period, as discussed in the CDA. Awards earned will vest in full on the third anniversary of the applicable grant date.
Pay Versus Performance Table
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S -K , the Company is providing the following information regarding the relationship between executive “compensation actually paid” (CAP) and financial performance of the Company for each of the fiscal years presented. In determining CAP to the named executive officers, the Company is required to make various adjustments to the amounts that have been previously reported in the Summary Compensation Tables for the fiscal years presented, as the SEC’s valuation methods for this section differ from those required in the Summary Compensation Table. For more detailed information concerning the Company’s pay -for-performance philosophy and how its executive compensation program is designed to further this concept, please see the CDA section of this Proxy Statement.
|
Year |
Summary
|
Compensation
|
Summary
|
Compensation
|
|
Average
|
Value of Initial Fixed $100
|
Net Income
|
Diluted
|
Return on
|
||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
(2)
|
Year |
Reported
|
Add: Change in
|
Deduct: Reported
|
Add: Pension
|
Compensation
|
||
|
2023 |
|
(
|
|
|
|
||
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2021 |
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
||
|
2020 |
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
(a)
(b)
44
Executive Compensation
the applicable year; (iv) addition of an amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any equity awards granted in prior years that vested in the applicable year; and (v) deduction of an amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year of any equity awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year. Adjustments made with respect to performance -based awards that vested or failed to vest in an applicable fiscal year were based on the achievement of performance goals during the applicable three -year performance period of 86.7%, 52.9%, 94.4%, and 117.3% in 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, as more fully discussed in the CDA section of this Proxy Statement. The fair value information for all unvested equity awards is based on the target vesting percentage for performance -based stock awards. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the “Change in Value of Stock Awards during Fiscal Year” are as follows:
|
Year |
Grant Date
|
Year-End Fair
|
Change in Fair
|
Year over Year
|
Fair Value of
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
2023 |
(
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
2022 |
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
2021 |
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
2020 |
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(c)
(d)
(3)
(4)
|
Year |
Reported
|
Add: Change in
|
Compensation
|
||
|
2024 |
|
(
|
|
||
|
2023 |
|
(
|
|
(a)
(b)
45
Executive Compensation
the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year. Adjustments made with respect to performance -based awards that vested or failed to vest in an applicable fiscal year were based on the achievement of performance goals during the applicable three -year performance period of 135.4% and 86.7% in 2024 and 2023, respectively, as more fully discussed in the CDA section of this Proxy Statement. The fair value information for all unvested equity awards is based on the target vesting percentage for performance -based stock awards. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the “Change in Value of Stock Awards during Fiscal Year” are as follows:
|
Year |
Grant Date
|
Year-End Fair
|
Change in Fair
|
Year over Year
|
Fair Value of
|
Total Equity
|
||
|
2024 |
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
||
|
2023 |
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(5)
(6)
|
Year |
Reported
|
Add: Change in
|
Deduct: Reported
|
Add: Pension
|
Compensation
|
||
|
2024 |
|
(
|
|
|
|
||
|
2023 |
|
(
|
|
|
|
||
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2021 |
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
||
|
2020 |
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
(a)
(b)
46
Executive Compensation
discussed in the CDA section of this Proxy Statement. The fair value information for all unvested equity awards is based on the target vesting percentage for performance -based stock awards. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the “Change in Value of Stock Awards during Fiscal Year” are as follows:
|
Year |
Grant Date
|
Year-End Fair
|
Change in Fair
|
Year over Year
|
Fair Value of
|
Total Equity
|
||
|
2024 |
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
||
|
2023 |
(
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
||
|
2022 |
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
||
|
2021 |
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
||
|
2020 |
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(c)
(d)
(7)
(8)
(9)
47
Executive Compensation
Financial Performance Measures and Analysis of CAP
As described in more detail in the CDA section of this Proxy Statement, the Company’s executive compensation program includes elements of performance -based compensation based on the profitability and growth of the Company. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that these profitability metrics support the achievement of both short and long -term financial success and align the interests of executives with shareholders.
The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive CAP to the Company’s named executive officers to the Company’s performance are as follows:
•
•
•
The Company’s annual profit -sharing bonus program is funded and paid semi -annually based on a target of 22.5% of the Company’s net income after taxes. As such, all cash bonuses paid by the Company are available only when, and to the extent that, the Company is profitable overall. Furthermore, 60% of the Company’s LTIC awards consist of performance -based restricted stock or RSUs that vest three years from the date of grant with the amounts earned, if any, based on the Company’s achievement of EPS and ROE performance targets for the prospective three -year performance period. No performance -based awards are earned if threshold performance targets are not met.
As demonstrated in the graphs below, the CAP to the PEOs and the average amount of CAP to the non -PEO NEOs as a group is generally aligned with the Company’s profitability over the fiscal years presented as measured based on net income, diluted EPS, and ROE. The alignment of compensation is due to the fact that a significant portion of the compensation actually paid to the PEOs and to the non -PEO NEOs is comprised of incentive based compensation in the form of profit -sharing bonuses, which are based on net income growth, and performance -based equity awards, which are earned and vest solely based on the Company’s EPS growth and ROE achievement during a performance period.
48
Executive Compensation
49
Executive Compensation
Stock Vested
The following table sets forth the vesting of restricted stock during 2024 for the named executive officers.
|
Name |
Stock Awards |
||
|
Number of Shares
|
Value Realized on
|
||
|
Martin H. Resch |
8,333 |
366,569 |
|
|
Michael J. Normile |
9,643 |
426,231 |
|
|
James M. Cavellier |
6,052 |
266,277 |
|
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
3,035 |
133,510 |
|
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
6,302 |
277,225 |
|
(1) Represents gross amount of shares acquired upon vesting of time and performance-based restricted stock and RSUs, without netting any shares surrendered to pay taxes.
(2) Value is determined by applying the market value of the stock on the vesting date to the number of shares or units vested.
50
Beneficial Ownership of Securities
Stock Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers, and 5% Beneficial Owners
The following table contains information with respect to beneficial ownership of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of February 16, 2025, unless otherwise noted, by: (i) each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, (ii) each director and nominee for director, (iii) each named executive officer, and (iv) current directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the named person has sole voting and investment rights with respect to such shares. The percent of common stock owned by each person or group has been determined based on a total of 13,503,248 shares outstanding as of February 16, 2025. Except as indicated below, the address of each person listed is c/o Cass Information Systems, Inc., 12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 550, St. Louis, MO 63131.
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount of Shares Beneficially Owned (1) |
Percent of Class |
|
AJH Investments LLC
|
1,057,320 (2) |
7.83 % |
|
BlackRock, Inc.
|
1,100,474 (3) |
8.15 % |
|
The Vanguard Group
|
796,969 (4) |
5.90 % |
|
Focus Partners Wealth LLC
|
762,482 (5) |
5.65 % |
|
Eric H. Brunngraber |
148,081 (6) |
* |
|
James M. Cavellier |
16,286 (7) |
* |
|
Ralph W. Clermont |
21,610 (8) |
* |
|
Robert A. Ebel |
23,243 (9) |
* |
|
Benjamin F. Edwards, IV |
25,134 (10) |
* |
|
Dwight D. Erdbruegger |
13,659 |
* |
|
Wendy J. Henry |
4,655 (11) |
* |
|
James J. Lindemann |
30,382 (12) |
* |
|
Ann W. Marr |
4,730 (13) |
* |
|
Michael J. Normile |
13,041 (14) |
* |
|
Martin H. Resch |
31,917 (15) |
* |
|
Sally H. Roth |
9,399 (16) |
* |
|
Joseph D. Rupp |
18,485 (17) |
* |
|
Randall L. Schilling |
28,154 (18) |
* |
|
Matthew S. Schuckman |
8,536 (19) |
* |
|
Franklin D. Wicks, Jr. |
28,787 (20) |
* |
|
All directors (including nominees) and all executive officers as a group (16 persons) |
426,099 (21) |
3.16 % |
* Less than 1% of class.
1. The numbers reported do not include outstanding RSUs, as unvested RSUs do not carry voting rights and none will vest within 60 days of February 16, 2025.
51
Ownership of Common Stock
2. Based on shareholder records as of December 31, 2024 obtained from Computershare Shareowner Services and Broadridge Financial Solutions.
3. Based on a Schedule 13F filed by the reporting person with the SEC on February 7, 2025. BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 1,078,985 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,100,474 shares.
4. Based on a Schedule 13F filed by the reporting person with the SEC on February 11, 2025. The Vanguard Group has shared voting power with respect to 21,894 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 763,777 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 33,192 shares.
5. Based on Schedule 13F filed by the reporting person with the SEC on February 14, 2025. The reporting person reports having sole dispositive power over the shares included in the table and no voting power.
6. Includes 133,951 shares owned jointly with his spouse over which Mr. Brunngraber has shared voting and investment rights.
7. Includes 8,898 shares held in a trust and 3,855 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Cavellier has voting but no investment rights.
8. Includes 1,200 shares held in trust and 20,410 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Clermont has voting but no investment rights.
9. Includes 3,354 shares owned jointly with his spouse over which Mr. Ebel has shared voting and investment rights and 14,401 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Ebel has voting but no investment rights.
10. Includes 19,666 shares held in trust and 1,602 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Edwards has voting but no investment rights.
11. Includes 4,655 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Ms. Henry has voting but no investment rights.
12. Includes 6,137 shares held in trust and 24,245 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Lindemann has voting but no investment rights.
13. Includes 4,730 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Ms. Marr has voting but no investment rights.
14. Includes 4,122 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Normile has voting but no investment rights.
15. Includes 11,085 shares held in trust and 14,083 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Resch has voting but no investment rights.
16. Includes 9,399 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Ms. Roth has voting but no investment rights.
17. Includes 18,485 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Rupp has voting but no investment rights.
18. Includes 24,245 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Schilling has voting but no investment rights.
19. Includes 3,419 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Schuckman has voting but no investment rights.
20. Includes 6,687 shares held in trust and 22,100 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which Mr. Wicks has voting but no investment rights.
21. Includes 169,751 shares of restricted stock subject to forfeiture with respect to which the holders have voting but no investment rights.
52
Proposal No. 3
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit and Risk Committee of the Board has appointed KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025. KPMG LLP has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 1983. The Audit and Risk Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. To help ensure independence, the Audit and Risk Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance, and independence of KPMG LLP and its lead audit partner and periodically considers the rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm. In the course of these reviews, the Audit and Risk Committee considers, among other things:
• The quality and effectiveness of services provided by the auditors;
• The auditors’ technical expertise and knowledge of the Company’s operations and industry;
• Any issues raised by the PCAOB’s most recent quality control review of KPMG LLP; and
• The potential impact of appointing a different public accounting firm.
A representative of KPMG LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions of shareholders.
Fees Incurred for Services Performed by the Independent Registered Public Accountant
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company incurred the following fees for services performed by KPMG LLP, all of which were pre -approved by the Audit and Risk Committee:
|
2024 |
2023 |
|||
|
Audit Fees (1) |
$905,000 |
$775,000 |
||
|
Audit-Related Fees (2) |
— |
35,000 |
||
|
Total Fees |
$905,000 |
$810,000 |
(1) Represents fees for the quarterly review of financial statements and annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. Also includes fees for the audit of the Company’s subsidiary bank financial statements, pursuant to the requirements of 12 CFR Part 363, Annual Independent Audits and Reporting Requirements. Such fees were $60,000 and $50,000 for 2024 and 2023, respectively. All such fees were pre -approved by the Audit and Risk Committee.
(2) Represents fees for the consent filed with the Company’s Form S -8 registration statement registering shares for issuance under the Omnibus Plan.
53
Proposal No. 3 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit and Risk Committee pre -approves all auditing services, internal control -related services, and permitted non -audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for the Company by its independent auditors, subject to the de minimis exception for non -audit services that are approved by the Audit and Risk Committee prior to the completion of the audit. The Audit and Risk Committee has delegated the authority to grant pre -approvals of audit and permitted non -audit services to the Chair, provided such decisions to grant pre -approvals are presented to the full Audit and Risk Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
|
The Company’s Board recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025. |
54
Shareholder Proposals for the 2026 Annual Meeting
In order for a shareholder to bring any business before a meeting of shareholders or nominate a candidate for election as a director at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Company’s Secretary and comply with the other notice requirements set forth in the Company’s bylaws. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the Company’s principal executive offices not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s Annual Meeting. For the 2026 Annual Meeting, shareholders must submit proposals or nominations no earlier than January 15, 2026 and no later than February 14, 2026. If, however, the date of the meeting is changed by more than 30 days before or after such anniversary date, the notice must be received not later than the tenth day following the day on which such notice of the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made.
Shareholder Proposals:
A shareholder’s notice to the Secretary must set forth as to each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the Annual Meeting the following, among other information:
• a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the Annual Meeting and the reasons for conducting the business at the Annual Meeting;
• the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of the proposing shareholder and any beneficial owner on whose behalf the business is submitted;
• the class and number of shares which are beneficially owned by the shareholder and beneficial owner;
• any material interest of the shareholder or beneficial owner in such business; and
• any other information that would be required to be provided under Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.
Shareholder Nominees for Director:
A shareholder’s notice to the Secretary of a director nominee must set forth, among other matters:
• as to each nominee, all information relating to the nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act; the name, address, and occupation of the nominee; the class and number of shares of the Company that are beneficially owned by the nominee; and a description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and each nominee and any other person or persons pursuant to which the nominations are to be made; and
• as to the nominating shareholder, the name and address of such shareholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made; the class and number of shares of the Company that are beneficially owned by such shareholder and any beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is made; and any material interest of such shareholder and owner.
The Secretary will promptly forward such materials to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair. The same criteria apply with respect to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s evaluation of all candidates for membership to the Board. However, separate procedures will apply if a shareholder wishes to submit at an Annual Meeting a director candidate who is not approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or the full Board. In order for a shareholder to give timely notice of nominations for directors for inclusion on a universal proxy card in connection with the 2026 Annual Meeting, notice must be submitted no later than February 14, 2026 (which is 60 days before the first anniversary of the preceding year’s Annual Meeting) and must include the information required by the bylaws and by Rule 14a -19 under the Exchange Act.
55
Shareholder Proposals for the 2026 Annual Meeting
The requirements contained in the Company’s bylaws and summarized above are separate from and in addition to the SEC requirements that a shareholder must meet to have a proposal included in the Company’s Proxy Statement. Any shareholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of proxy for its next Annual Meeting must be received by the Company no later than November 6, 2025.
All notices described in this section should be sent to the following address:
Cass Information Systems, Inc. Attn: Matthew S. Schuckman, Secretary, 12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 550, St. Louis, Missouri 63131.
56
Other Matters; Householding; Availability of Proxy Materials
Management does not intend to present to the Annual Meeting any business other than the items stated in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and does not know of any matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting other than those referred to above. If, however, any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons designated as proxies will vote on each such matter in accordance with their best judgment.
The Company and some banks, brokers, and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of householding proxy materials, including Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy statements and annual reports. This means only a single copy of these proxy materials may be sent to multiple shareholders in your household unless you provide us with contrary instructions. The Company will deliver, promptly upon request, a separate copy of the proxy materials to any shareholder who is subject to householding. You can request a separate copy of the proxy materials by writing to the Company at Cass Information Systems, Inc., Attn: Matthew S. Schuckman, Secretary, 12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 550, St. Louis, MO 63131 or by calling the Company at 314 506 -5500 . Once you have received notice from your broker or the Company that the broker or the Company will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate copy of the proxy materials in the future, or if you currently receive multiple sets of proxy materials and would prefer to participate in householding, please notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account or the Company if you hold registered shares. You can notify the Company as noted above.
The Company has elected to furnish proxy materials to shareholders online. The Company believes that doing so expedites your receipt of these materials while lowering costs and reducing the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. The Company mailed the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10 -K for fiscal 2024 online on or about March 6, 2025. If you would like to receive printed copies of these proxy materials, the Company will provide them free of charge upon your request to the Company as noted above.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors
|
57
Annex A
As previously described, for the purposes of certifying the Company’s performance under the Company’s compensation plans, the Compensation Committee at times makes adjustments to the Company’s GAAP results to ensure that the participants are compensated for the Company’s adjusted financial performance. These adjustments mainly include merger -related and restructuring charges or specific Board identified and approved performance items. These adjustments are made so that participants are compensated for the Company’s organic performance and are neither penalized nor rewarded for one -time charges, unusual gains, or similar non -recurring events.
The adjustments for 2024 impact the Profit -Sharing Bonus performance metric of net income and the LTIC performance metrics of of EPS and ROE. The Company derives each of these non -GAAP performance metrics from its adjusted net income, which, as described below, is a non -GAAP financial measure, and accordingly, each of these adjusted financial measures is determined by methods other than in accordance with GAAP. See the below reconciliation of the Company’s non -GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G adopted by the SEC.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Information
|
2024 Adjusted Net Income for Annual Incentive Awards |
||
|
2024 |
||
|
Income before income tax expense |
$24,219 |
|
|
Income tax expense |
5,051 |
|
|
2024 GAAP net income as reported |
$19,168 |
|
|
Adjustments: |
||
|
Pension termination expense |
$3,458 |
|
|
Adjusted pre-tax income |
27,677 |
|
|
Adjusted income tax expense |
5,916 |
|
|
Adjusted net income (non-GAAP) |
$21,761 |
|
|
2024 Annual Incentive Award Performance Metrics |
|||
|
Performance Metric |
GAAP
|
Performance Metric Calculated
|
|
|
Net income |
$19,168 |
$21,761 |
|
|
EPS (1) |
$1.39 |
$1.58 |
|
|
Average ROE (2) |
8.37% |
9.51% |
|
(1) Represents adjusted earnings per common share calculated using weighted average diluted common shares.
(2) Represents the adjusted return on average equity calculated using average total equity.
58
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 2025 Annual Meeting Proxy Card IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. A Proposals — The Board of Dir A ectors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed, FOR Proposal 2, and FOR Proposal 3. 1. Election of Directors: 01 - Ralph W. Clermont 04 - Sally H. Roth For Against Abstain 02 - Wendy J. Henry 03 - James J. Lindemann 2. To approve the advisory resolution on executive compensation: 3. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2025 B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. 1 U P X 043DDE
Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at: http://www.cassinfo.com IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Proxy — Cass Information Systems, Inc. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY The undersigned hereby appoints Martin H. Resch and Michael J. Normile, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all the shares of Cass Information Systems, Inc. Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held April 15, 2025 or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Meeting. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTOR AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side)