CHMG 10-Q Quarterly Report Sept. 30, 2011

CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORP

10-Ks and 10-Qs

10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009

PROXIES

DEF 14A	Filed on June 3, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on April 23, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on June 4, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on April 24, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on April 27, 2023
DEF 14A	Filed on April 29, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on Dec. 31, 2021
DEF 14A	Filed on April 26, 2021
DEF 14A	Filed on March 31, 2020
DEF 14A	Filed on March 29, 2019
DEF 14A	Filed on March 29, 2018
DEF 14A	Filed on March 31, 2017
DEF 14A	Filed on March 31, 2016
DEF 14A	Filed on March 27, 2015
DEF 14A	Filed on March 31, 2014
DEF 14A	Filed on April 1, 2013
DEF 14A	Filed on March 30, 2012
DEF 14A	Filed on April 1, 2011
DEF 14A	Filed on March 30, 2010
DEF 14A	Filed on None

10-Q 1 sept30201110q.htm CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION 10Q 9-30-2011 sept30201110q.htm

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q
[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
Or
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 0-13888

CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York				16-1237038
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)				I.R.S. Employer Identification No.

One Chemung Canal Plaza, P.O. Box 1522, Elmira, NY				14902
(Address of principal executive offices)				(Zip Code)

(607) 737-3711 or (800) 836-3711
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES: X NO:____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES: X NO:____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer		[ ]	Non-accelerated filer		[ ]
Accelerated filer		[ ]	Smaller reporting company		[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
YES: ____ NO: X

The number of shares of the registrant's common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding on October 31, 2011 was 4,569,710.

CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	PAGE

Item 1:	Financial Statements - Unaudited

	Consolidated Balance Sheet	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income	4
	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	8

Item 2:	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	37

Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	52

Item 4:	Controls and Procedures	52

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	53

Item 1A:	Risk Factors	53

Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	53

Item 6:	Exhibits	53

SIGNATURES		54

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Financial Statements

CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

	SEPTEMBER 30, 2011			DECEMBER, 31, 2010
ASSETS
Cash and due from financial institutions	$	30,748,786		$	16,540,095
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		87,723,958			44,079,682
Total cash and cash equivalents		118,472,744			60,619,777

Securities available for sale, at estimated fair value		279,078,596			223,544,961
Securities held to maturity, estimated fair value of $8,483,553 at September 30, 2011 and $8,297,392 at December 31, 2010		7,585,671			7,715,123
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock, at cost		5,672,450			3,328,900

Loans, net of deferred origination fees and costs, and unearned income		788,458,576			613,684,369
Allowance for loan losses		(9,676,923	)		(9,498,131	)
Loans, net		778,781,653			604,186,238

Loans held for sale		74,412			486,997
Premises and equipment, net		24,250,065			24,192,593
Goodwill		22,157,213			9,872,375
Other intangible assets, net		6,478,541			4,655,900
Bank owned life insurance		2,602,647			2,536,715
Other assets		20,768,574			17,187,706

Total assets	$	1,265,922,566		$	958,327,285

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing	$	261,945,489		$	197,322,036
Interest-bearing		780,260,416			589,036,816
Total deposits		1,042,205,905			786,358,852

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		41,453,658			44,774,615
Federal Home Loan Bank term advances		43,936,174			20,000,000
Accrued interest payable		822,970			784,351
Dividends payable		1,142,015			881,203
Other liabilities		7,674,121			8,119,701
Total liabilities		1,137,234,843			860,918,722

Shareholders' equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 5,310,076 issued at September 30, 2011 and 4,300,134 issued at December 31, 2010		53,101			43,001
Additional-paid-in capital		45,709,779			22,022,122
Retained earnings		98,808,285			94,407,620
Treasury stock, at cost (742,518 shares at September 30, 2011; 749,880 shares at December 31, 2010)		(18,948,660	)		(19,166,655	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,065,218			102,475

Total shareholders' equity		128,687,723			97,408,563

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,265,922,566		$	958,327,285
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,			September 30,			September 30,				September 30,
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME	2011			2010			2011				2010
Loans, including fees	$	31,456,406		$	26,412,468		$	11,673,215		$	8,742,046
Taxable securities		4,347,409			4,968,287			1,504,393			1,555,301
Tax exempt securities		1,035,068			888,938			350,557			300,917
Interest-bearing deposits		166,955			123,984			65,139			41,709
Total interest and dividend income		37,005,838			32,393,677			13,593,304			10,639,973

INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		3,325,900			4,452,535			1,138,130			1,335,770
Borrowed funds		783,022			711,231			285,084			239,634
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		1,056,095			1,257,428			326,542			383,095
Total interest expense		5,165,017			6,421,194			1,749,756			1,958,499
Net interest income		31,840,821			25,972,483			11,843,548			8,681,474
Provision for loan losses		833,333			1,125,000			583,333			375,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		31,007,488			24,847,483			11,260,215			8,306,474

Other operating income:
Wealth management group fee income		5,131,119			6,256,974			1,746,958			2,183,765
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,180,733			3,428,277			1,130,824			1,106,415
Net gain on securities transactions		1,108,091			451,094			428,882			-
Other-than-temporary loss on investment securities:
Total impairment losses		(67,400	)		(393,005	)		(67,400	)		(56,380	)
Loss recognized in other comprehensive income		-			-			-			-
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings		(67,400	)		(393,005	)		(67,400	)		(56,380	)
Net gain on sales of loans held for sale		132,902			166,247			53,571			32,681
Credit card merchant earnings		162,215			148,107			57,153			48,937
Gains on sales of other real estate owned		89,404			33,550			442			-
Income from bank owned life insurance		65,932			65,213			22,321			22,075
Other		3,617,016			2,750,745			955,712			909,951
Total other operating income		13,420,012			12,907,202			4,328,463			4,247,444

Other operating expenses:
Salaries and wages		12,534,214			11,362,716			4,272,612			3,768,761
Pension and other employee benefits		3,296,814			2,828,493			1,172,044			809,940
Net occupancy expenses		3,663,005			3,272,432			1,230,490			1,065,930
Furniture and equipment expenses		1,549,048			1,441,030			486,518			465,262
Data processing expense		2,881,150			2,457,347			976,050			822,341
Amortization of intangible assets		753,192			550,531			288,001			180,363
Losses on sales of other real estate owned		1,671			17,983			-			(7,575	)
Other real estate owned expenses		86,040			305,147			37,549			112,307
FDIC insurance		737,281			912,652			294,897			287,298
Merger related expenses		2,243,919			-			20,500			-
Other		5,515,652			4,395,221			1,838,726			1,378,395
Total other operating expenses		33,261,986			27,543,552			10,617,387			8,883,022

Income before income tax expense		11,165,514			10,211,133			4,971,291			3,670,896
Income tax expense		3,589,455			3,157,001			1,680,351			1,119,960
Net income	$	7,576,059		$	7,054,132		$	3,290,940		$	2,550,936

Weighted average shares outstanding		4,297,777			3,604,502			4,637,392			3,602,277

Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	1.76		$	1.96		$	0.71		$	0.71
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED )

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balances at December 31, 2009	$	43,001	$	22,806,829		$	87,826,331		$	(20,024,661	)	$	(565,835	)	$	90,085,665
Comprehensive Income:
Net income		-		-			7,054,132			-			-			7,054,132
Change in unrealized gains(losses) on securities AFS, net		-		-			-			-			2,633,416			2,633,416
Change in funded status of Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Benefit Plans, net		-		-			-			-			231,937			231,937
Total comprehensive income (loss)		-		-			-			-			-			9,919,485
Restricted stock units for directors' deferred compensation plan		-		83,311			-			-			-			83,311
Cash dividends declared ($.75 per share)		-		-			(2,639,382	)		-			-			(2,639,382	)
Distribution of 10,082 shares of treasury stock for directors’ compensation		-		(44,677	)		-			258,906			-			214,229
Distribution of 2,750 shares of treasury stock for employee compensation		-		(15,537	)		-			70,537			-			55,000
Purchase of 20,260 shares of treasury stock		-		-			-			(425,566	)		-			(425,566	)
Balances at September 30, 2010	$	43,001	$	22,829,926		$	92,241,081		$	(20,120,784	)	$	2,299,518		$	97,292,742
Balances at December 31, 2010	$	43,001	$	22,022,122		$	94,407,620		$	(19,166,655	)	$	102,475		$	97,408,563
Comprehensive Income:
Net income		-		-			7,576,059			-			-			7,576,059
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities AFS, net				-			-			-			2,678,187			2,678,187
Change in funded status of Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Benefit Plans, net		-		-			-			-			284,556			284,556
Total comprehensive income (loss)		-		-			-			-			-			10,538,802
Restricted stock awards		-		21,226			-			-			-			21,226
Restricted stock units for directors' deferred compensation plan		-		61,129			-			-			-			61,129
Cash dividends declared ($.75 per share)		-		-			(3,175,394	)		-			-			(3,175,394	)
Distribution of 10,378 shares of treasury stock for directors' compensation		-		(33,831	)		-			265,262			-			231,431
Distribution of 2,392 shares of treasury stock for employee compensation		-		(6,140	)		-			61,140			-			55,000
Distribution of 286 shares of treasury stock for director’s deferred compensation		-		(7,364	)		-			7,310			-			(54	)
Distribution of 4,387 shares of treasury stock for employee restricted stock warrants		-		(60,800	)		-			112,090			-			51,290
Purchase of 13,981 shares of treasury stock		-		-			-			(327,413	)		-			(327,413	)
Sale of 3,900 shares of treasury stock		-		(10,101	)		-			99,606			-			89,505
Issuance of 1,009,942 shares related to FOFC Merger		10,100		23,723,538			-			-			-			23,733,638
Balances at September 30, 2011	$	53,101	$	45,709,779		$	98,808,285		$	(18,948,660	)	$	3,065,218		$	128,687,723
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:	2011			2010
Net income	$	7,576,059		$	7,054,132
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of intangible assets		753,192			550,531
Provision for loan losses		833,333			1,125,000
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets		2,129,738			2,057,825
Amortization of premiums on securities, net		960,973			489,661
Gains on sales of loans held for sale, net		(132,902	)		(166,247	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		5,523,214			5,686,897
Loans originated and held for sale		(4,977,727	)		(5,906,757	)
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned		(87,733	)		(15,568	)
Net gains on securities transactions		(1,108,091	)		(451,094	)
Net impairment loss recognized on investment securities		67,400			393,005
Decrease in other assets		2,752,047			671,468
(Increase) decrease in prepaid FDIC assessment		(49,464	)		819,241
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(265,000	)		(235,220	)
Expense related to restricted stock units for directors' deferred compensation plan		61,129			83,311
Expense related to employee stock compensation		55,000			55,000
Expense related to employee stock awards		21,226			-
Decrease in other liabilities		(2,243,010	)		(2,987,293	)
Income from bank owned life insurance		(65,932	)		(65,213	)
Proceeds from sales of student loans		-			137,509
Net cash provided by operating activities		11,803,452			9,296,188

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available for sale		67,741,210			50,440,459
Proceeds from maturities and principal collected on securities available for sale		23,608,123			49,260,195
Proceeds from maturities and principal collected on securities held to maturity		3,448,732			9,561,278
Purchases of securities available for sale		(95,911,022	)		(110,793,064	)
Purchases of securities held to maturity		(3,319,281	)		(5,429,297	)
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock		(1,002,500	)		(58,200	)
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock		237,250			-
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,307,723	)		(1,230,458	)
Cash paid Fort Orange Financial Corp. acquisition		(8,137,816	)		-
Cash received Fort Orange Financial Corp. acquisition		33,284,995			-
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		356,207			236,102
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(10,967,168	)		3,210,362
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		8,031,007			(4,802,623	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in demand deposits, NOW accounts, savings accounts, and insured money market accounts		70,452,474			17,197,567
Net decrease in time deposits and individual retirement accounts		(15,073,756	)		(14,749,680	)
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(13,889,730	)		(10,497,579	)
Net decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank long term advances		(317,990	)		-
Purchase of treasury stock		(327,413	)		(425,566	)
Sale of treasury stock		89,505			-
Cash dividends paid		(2,914,582	)		(2,641,239	)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities		38,018,508			(11,116,497	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		57,852,967			(6,622,932	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		60,619,777			79,738,396
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	118,472,744		$	73,115,464
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

(Cash Flow continued)


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	5,126,397	$	6,656,414
Income Taxes	$	3,340,847	$	4,575,675
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	$	308,976	$	554,246

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Presentation

Chemung Financial Corporation (the "Corporation"), through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Chemung

Canal Trust Company (the "Bank") and CFS Group, Inc., a financial services company, provides a wide

range of banking, financing, fiduciary and other financial services to its local market area. The

consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly owned

subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

The data in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 was derived from the audited

consolidated financial statements in the Corporation's 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was

filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2011. That data, along with the other

interim financial information presented in the consolidated balance sheets, statements of income,

shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows should be read in conjunction with the

audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, contained in the 2010 Annual

Report on Form 10-K. Amounts in prior periods' consolidated interim financial statements are

reclassified whenever necessary to conform to the current period's presentation.

The consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of

management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary to present fairly the Corporation's financial

position as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and results of operations for the three and

nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and changes in shareholders' equity and cash

flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Subsequent events were

evaluated for any required recognition or disclosure. The results for the periods presented are not

necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other interim period.

2. Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares

outstanding during the period. Issuable shares including those related to directors’ restricted stock units

and directors’ stock compensation are considered outstanding and are included in the computation of

basic earnings per share as they are earned. All outstanding unvested share based payment awards that

contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends are considered participating securities for this calculation.

Restricted stock awards are grants of participating securities. The impact of the participating securities

on earnings per share is not material. Earnings per share information is adjusted to present comparative

results for stock splits and stock dividends that occur. Earnings per share were computed by dividing

net income by 4,297,777 and 3,604,502 weighted average shares outstanding for the nine-month periods

ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and 4,637,392 and 3,602,277 weighted average shares outstanding

for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. There were no dilutive

common stock equivalents during the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.

3. Fair Value

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the

principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market

participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair

value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the

entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices

for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that

are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity's own assumptions

about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The fair values of securities available for sale are usually determined by obtaining quoted prices on

nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs), or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical

technique widely used to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the

specific securities but rather by relying on the securities' relationship to other benchmark quoted

securities (Level 2 inputs).

The Corporation's investment in collateralized debt obligations consisting of pooled trust preferred

securities which are issued by financial institutions were historically priced using Level 2 inputs. The

lack of observable inputs and market activity in this class of investments has been significant and

resulted in unreliable external pricing. Broker pricing and bid/ask spreads, when available, have

varied widely. The once active market has become comparatively inactive. As a result, these investments are

now priced using Level 3 inputs.

The Corporation has developed an internal model for pricing these securities. This is the same model

used in determining other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) as further described in Note 8.

Information such as historical and current performance of the underlying collateral, deferral/default

rates, collateral coverage ratios, break in yield calculations, cash flow projections, liquidity and credit

premiums required by a market participant, and financial trend analysis with respect to the individual

issuing financial institutions, are utilized in determining individual security valuations. Discount rates

were utilized along with the cash flow projections in order to calculate an appropriate fair value. These

discount rates were calculated based on industry index rates and adjusted for various credit and liquidity

factors. Due to current market conditions as well as the limited trading activity of these securities, the

market value of the securities is highly sensitive to assumption changes and market volatility.

The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally

based on recent real estate appraisals and collateral evaluations. The appraisals may utilize a single

valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income

approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by third party appraisers to adjust for

differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically

significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Non-recurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as other

real estate owned ("OREO") are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less costs to

sell. Fair values are generally based on third party appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3

classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value less costs to sell, an

impairment loss is recognized.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

			Fair Value Measurement at September 30, 2011 Using
Financial Assets:	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Obligations of U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	$	142,948,508	$	36,088,000	$	106,860,508	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		57,220,655		-		57,220,655		-
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		46,636,291		-		46,636,291		-
Trust Preferred securities		2,280,848		-		1,985,938		294,910
Corporate bonds and notes		13,792,147		-		13,792,147		-
CMO’s		8,468,507		-		8,468,507		-
SBA Pool’s		2,305,718		-		2,305,718		-
Corporate stocks		5,425,922		4,741,501		684,421		-
Total available for sale securities	$	279,078,596	$	40,829,501	$	237,954,185	$	294,910

			Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2010 Using
Financial Assets:	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Obligations of U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	$	102,131,517	$	40,581,250	$	61,550,267	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		62,761,633		-		62,761,633		-
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		38,765,092		-		38,765,092		-
Trust Preferred securities		2,344,094		-		2,009,509		334,585
Corporate bonds and notes		11,694,190		-		11,694,190		-
Corporate stocks		5,848,435		5,209,069		639,366		-
Total available for sale securities	$	223,544,961	$	45,790,319	$	177,420,057	$	334,585

The table below presents a reconciliation of all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine-month periods ending September 30,

2011 and 2010:

	Fair Value Measurement nine-months ended September 30, 2011 Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Fair Value Measurement nine-months ended September 30, 2010 Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Investment Securities Available for Sale
Beginning balance	$	334,585		$	511,480
Total gains/losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Income on securities		-			-
Impairment charge on investment securities		(67,400	)		(393,005	)
Included in other comprehensive income		27,725			172,340
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		-			-
Ending balance September 30	$	294,910		$	290,815

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:

			Fair Value Measurement at September 30, 2011 Using
Financial Assets:	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial and industrial	$	701,710	$	-	$	-	$	701,710
Commercial mortgages:		407,551		-		-		407,551
Other		392,257		-		-		392,257
Total Impaired Loans	$	1,501,578	$	-	$	-	$	1,501,578

Other real estate owned, net	$	661,475	$	-	$	-	$	661,475

			Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2010 Using
Financial Assets:	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired Loans:
Commercial mortgages:
Construction	$	72,211	$	-	$	-	$	72,211
Other		580,329		-		-		580,329
Total Impaired Loans	$	652,540	$	-	$	-	$	652,540

Other real estate owned, net	$	740,620	$	-	$	-	$	740,620

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral

dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $3,088,321 with a valuation allowance of $1,586,743 as of

September 30, 2011, resulting in a $833,333 provision for loan losses for the nine-month period ending

September 30, 2011. Impaired loans had a carrying amount of $892,298, with a valuation allowance of

$239,758 as of December 31, 2010, resulting in no additional provision for loan losses for the year

ending December 31, 2010.

OREO, which is measured by the lower of carrying or fair value less costs to sell, had a net carrying

amount of $661,475 at September 30, 2011. The net carrying amount reflects the outstanding balance of

$784,162 net of a valuation allowance of $122,687 at September 30, 2011 which resulted in write downs

of $12,120 for the nine-month period ending September 30, 2011. OREO had a net carrying amount of

$740,620 at December 31, 2010. The net carrying amount reflected an outstanding balance of $909,947,

net of a valuation allowance of $169,327 at December 31, 2010 which resulted in write downs of

$169,327 for the year ending December 31, 2010.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of other financial instruments, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
Financial assets:	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value (1)		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value (1)
Cash and due from financial institutions	$	30,749	$	30,749	$	16,540	$	16,540
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		87,724		87,724		44,080		44,080
Securities available for sale		279,079		279,079		223,545		223,545
Securities held to maturity		7,586		8,484		7,715		8,297
Federal Home Loan and Federal Reserve Bank stock		5,672		N/A		3,329		N/A
Net loans		778,782		798,889		604,186		618,859
Loans held for sale		74,412		74,412		487		487
Accrued interest receivable		4,001		4,001		2,713		2,713
Financial liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand, savings, and insured money market accounts		736,711		736,711		532,555		532,555
Time deposits		305,495		307,978		253,804		256,281
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		41,454		43,975		44,775		46,667
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		43,936		47,452		20,000		21,609
Accrued interest payable		823		823		784		784
Dividends payable		1,142		1,142		881		881

(1) Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and due from financial institutions, interest bearing

deposits, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate

loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. The methods for determining the fair values for

securities were described previously. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or

deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using

current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair value of debt is based on current

rates for similar financing. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to

restrictions placed on its transferability. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is not considered

material.

4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The changes in goodwill included in the core banking segment during the periods ending September 30,

2011 and 2010 were as follows:

	2011		2010
Beginning of year	$	9,872,375	$	9,872,375
Acquired goodwill		12,284,838		-
September 30,	$	22,157,213	$	9,872,375

Acquired intangible assets were as follows at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	At September 30, 2011				At December 31, 2010
	Balance Acquired		Accumulated Amortization		Balance Acquired		Accumulated Amortization
Core deposit intangibles	$	3,819,798	$	1,050,211	$	1,174,272	$	674,141
Other customer relationship intangibles		6,063,423		2,354,469		6,133,116		1,977,347
Total	$	9,883,221	$	3,404,680	$	7,307,388	$	2,651,488

Aggregate amortization expense was $753,192 and $550,531 for the-nine month periods ended

September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The remaining estimated aggregate amortization expense at September 30, 2011 is listed below:

Year	Estimated Expense
2011	$	288,001
2012		1,046,720
2013		876,524
2014		777,801
2015		681,176
2016 and thereafter		2,808,319
Total	$	6,478,541

5. Business Combinations

Acquisition of Fort Orange Financial Corp.

On April 8, 2011, the Corporation completed its merger with Fort Orange Financial Corp. (“FOFC”), the

holding company of Capital Bank & Trust Company (“Capital Bank”) based in Albany, New York, with

FOFC being merged with and into the Corporation, and the Corporation being the surviving entity.

Immediately following the merger, Capital Bank was merged with and into the Bank.

As of the date of the merger, Capital Bank’s unaudited balance sheet included approximately $254

million in assets, a loan portfolio approximating $171 million and deposits of $199 million. With the

completion of the acquisition, the Corporation became a $1.2 billion financial institution with 28 offices

located in eight New York counties, as well as Bradford County in Pennsylvania. The Capital Bank

branch locations are in Albany, Clifton Park, Latham and Slingerlands.

Under the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) entered into on October 14,

2010, the Corporation purchased all of the outstanding shares of FOFC common stock in a stock and

cash transaction valued at $31.9 million, based upon the Corporation’s closing stock price on April 8,

2011 of $23.50. For each share of FOFC common stock outstanding immediately prior to the merger,

e ach FOFC shareholder had the right to elect to receive: (i) all cash in the amount of $7.50 per share

(“Cash Consideration”), (ii) all stock at an exchange ratio of 0.3571 of a share of the Corporation’s

common stock for each share of FOFC common stock (“Stock Consideration”) or (iii) a mix of Cash

Consideration for 25% of their shares and Stock Consideration for 75% of their shares. The total

consideration to be paid by the Corporation was subject to the requirement that 25% of the FOFC

common stock be acquired for the Cash Consideration and 75% be acquired for the Stock Consideration.

As a result of the merger, the Corporation issued approximately 1.01 million additional shares of its

common stock.

The table below illustrates the reconciliation of shares outstanding and the calculation of the

consideration effectively transferred.

Reconciliation of Shares Outstanding
FOFC shares outstanding at April 8, 2011	3,771,425
Percentage of stock consideration	75	%
FOFC shares exchanged for stock	2,828,569
Exchange Ratio	0.3571
Chemung Financial shares issued to FOFC shareholders (excludes fractional shares)	1,009,942

Chemung Financial shares outstanding April 8, 2011	3,565,610
Total Chemung Financial Shares at April 8, 2011 following the consummation of the transaction	4,575,552

Ownership % held by FOFC shareholders	22	%
Ownership % held by legacy Chemung Financial shareholders	78	%

Purchase Price Consideration (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
FOFC shares outstanding at April 8, 2011		3,771,425
Percentage of stock consideration		75	%
FOFC shares exchanged for stock		2,828,569
Exchange Ratio		0.3571
Chemung Financial shares issued to FOFC shareholders (excludes fractional shares)		1,009,942
Purchase price per Chemung Financial common share	$	23.50
Total stock consideration paid	$	23,734
Total cash consideration paid		6,939
Cash paid for fractional shares		3
Cash paid for the settlement of FOFC stock options		545
Cash paid for severance payments		650
Total consideration paid	$	31,871

As a result of the FOFC merger, we recognized assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair value as presented below: (in thousands).

Total Purchase Price				$	31,871

Net assets acquired:
Cash and due from banks	$	33,285
Securities available for sale		46,525
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		1,578
Loans		164,153
Accrued Interest Receivable		864
Premises and equipment		879
Core deposit intangible		2,646
Deferred tax asset		2,466
Other assets		3,530
Deposits		(200,468	)
Borrowings		(34,823	)
Accrued Interest Payable		(304	)
Other liabilities		(745	)

Net assets acquired				$	19,586

Goodwill resulting from the FOFC merger				$	12,285

The goodwill generated by the FOFC merger consists of, among other things, synergies and increased

economies of scale, including the ability to offer more diverse and profitable products, greater diversity

in the branch system which may lead to lower cost deposits, and an increased legal lending limit. We

expect that no goodwill recognized as a result of the FOFC merger will be deductible for income tax

purposes. Purchase accounting adjustments are subject to refinement as management finalizes their fair

value measurements, including their analysis of identifiable intangible assets. Since the branches

acquired were merged into the Bank, there is no segment impact of the FOFC merger.

The fair value of the financial assets acquired included loans receivable with an unpaid principal balance

of $170.7 million. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) prohibits carrying

over an allowance for loan losses for loans purchased in the merger. The table below illustrates the fair

value adjustments made to the unpaid principal balance in order to present a fair value of the loans

acquired (in thousands).

Gross loans-unpaid principal balance at April 8, 2011	$	170,682
Fair value adjustment on pools of homogeneous loans		(1,619	)
Credit fair value adjustment on loans with deteriorating credit quality		(4,820	)
Fair value of purchased loans at April 8, 2011	$	164,243

The fair value adjustment on pools of homogeneous loans represents adjustments a prospective acquirer

would make to the unpaid principal balance to account for differences between the contractual yield on

the portfolio and market interest rates, for credit, and for liquidity. The market rate adjustment

represents the movement in market interest rates, irrespective of credit adjustments, compared to the

stated rates of the acquired loans. The credit adjustment made on pools of homogeneous loans

represents the changes in credit quality of the underlying borrowers from the loan inception to the

merger date. The credit adjustment on loans with deteriorating credit quality is derived in accordance

with Accounting Standard Codification 310-30, “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated

Credit Quality” and represents the portion of the loan balance that has been deemed uncollectible

based on our expectations of future cash flows for each respective loan.

The information below presents the recorded fair value on April 8, 2011 of the Corporation’s purchased

impaired loans with the accretable and non-accretable related adjustments from the perspective of total

contractual cash flows (in thousands).

Contractually required principal and interest at acquisition	$	25,718
Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable discount)		(5,849	)
Expected cash flows at acquisition		19,869
Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable yield)		(1,861	)
Fair value of loans acquired with deteriorating credit quality	$	18,008

The results of operations of the merged entity have been reflected in Chemung Financial Corporation’s

consolidated statements of income beginning as of the acquisition date. Pro forma condensed

consolidated income statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 as if

the merger occurred at the beginning of each period presented are as follows (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
Financial assets:	2011		2010
Interest and dividend income	$	40,414	$	42,529
Interest expense		6,025		9,660
Net interest income		34,389		32,869
Provision for loan losses		1,808		2,375
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		32,581		30,494
Non-interest income	$	13,472	$	13,349
Non-interest expense		32,777		32,117
Income before income taxes		13,276		11,726
Income tax expense		4,406		3,742
Net income	$	8,870	$	7,984

Weighted average shares outstanding		4,629		4,614
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	1.92	$	1.73

The consolidated income statement for the Corporation includes $5.654 million of net interest income,

$72 thousand of non-interest income and net income of $2.314 million of the acquiree since

the acquisition date.

6. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income or loss of the Corporation represents net income plus other comprehensive

income or loss, which consists of the net change in unrealized holding gains or losses on securities

available for sale and the change in the funded status of the Corporation's defined benefit pension plan

and other benefit plans, net of the related tax effect. Accumulated other comprehensive income or loss

represents the net unrealized holding gains or losses on securities available for sale and the funded status

of the Corporation's defined benefit pension plan and other benefit plans, as of the consolidated balance

sheet dates, net of the related tax effect.

Comprehensive income for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 was $3,297,441

and $10,538,802, respectively. Comprehensive income for the three and nine-month periods ended

September 30, 2010 was $3,393,701 and $9,919,485, respectively. The following summarizes the

components of other comprehensive income:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
Other Comprehensive Income	2011			2010			2011			2010
Unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale	$	5,448,351		$	4,573,717		$	294,210		$	1,400,082
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings, net of reclassification		27,725			172,340			(9,425	)		(50,760	)
Reclassification adjustment net gains realized in net income		(1,108,091	)		(451,094	)		(428,882	)		-
Net unrealized gains (losses)		4,367,985			4,294,963			(144,097	)		1,349,322
Tax effect		1,689,798			1,661,547			(55,746	)		521,998
Net of tax amount	$	2,678,187		$	2,633,416		$	(88,351	)	$	827,324
Change in funded status of defined benefit pension plan and other benefit plans		464,097			378,277			154,699			25,183
Tax effect		179,541			146,340			59,847			9,742
Net of tax amount		284,556			231,937			94,852			15,441
Total other comprehensive income	$	2,962,743		$	2,865,353		$	6,501		$	842,765

The following is a summary of the accumulated other comprehensive income balance, net of tax:

	Balance at December 31, 2010				Current Period Change		Balance at September 30, 2011
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale		$	5,661,013		$	2,678,187	$	8,339,200
Unrealized loss on pension plans and other benefit plans			(5,558,538	)		284,556		(5,273,982	)
Total		$	102,475		$	2,962,743	$	3,065,218

7. Commitments and Contingencies

The Corporation is a party to certain financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk such as

commitments under standby letters of credit, unused portions of lines of credit, overdraft protection and

commitments to fund new loans. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, these financial instruments are not

recorded in the financial statements. The Corporation's policy is to record such instruments when

funded. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity

risk. Such transactions are generally used by the Corporation to manage clients' requests for funding

and other client needs.

Also in the normal course of business, there are various outstanding claims and legal proceedings

involving the Corporation or its subsidiaries. On February 14 and April 14, 2011, the Bank received

separate settlement demands from representatives of beneficiaries of certain trusts for which the Bank

has acted as trustee. The settlement demands relate to alleged claims of, among other things, breach of

the Bank’s fiduciary duties as trustee, including the Bank’s alleged failure to adequately diversify the

relevant trust portfolios. The beneficiaries seek aggregate damages of up to approximately $27.0 million.

On September 16, 2011, the beneficiaries objected in the Surrogate’s Court of the State of New York,

County of Chemung (the “Surrogate’s Court”) to accountings with respect to the above-mentioned trusts

provided by the Bank, based on allegations similar to those offered in the settlement demands. Although

these matters are inherently unpredictable, management will defend against these claims vigorously.

Management has concluded that it is reasonably possible, but not probable, that the financial position,

results of operations or cash flows of the Corporation could be materially adversely affected in any

particular period by the unfavorable resolution of these claims. An amount of loss or range of loss

cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

8. Securities

Amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale are as follows:

	September 30, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Obligations of U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	$	139,497,422	$	3,476,346	$	25,260	$	142,948,508
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		54,007,115		3,214,050		510		57,220,655
Collateralized Mortgage obligations		8,285,864		183,403		760		8,468,507
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		44,622,411		2,017,069		3,189		46,636,291
Corporate bonds and notes		13,475,088		476,400		159,341		13,792,147
SBA loan pools		2,265,412		40,306		-		2,305,718
Trust Preferred securities		2,536,347		105,236		360,735		2,280,848
Corporate stocks		788,129		4,652,367		14,574		5,425,922
Total	$	265,477,788	$	14,165,177	$	564,369	$	279,078,596


	December 31, 2010
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Obligations of U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	$	101,426,799	$	916,547	$	211,829	$	102,131,517
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		60,379,269		2,385,036		2,672		62,761,633
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		38,143,972		672,067		50,947		38,765,092
Corporate bonds and notes		11,019,343		674,847		-		11,694,190
Trust Preferred securities		2,597,993		134,561		388,460		2,344,094
Corporate stocks		744,763		5,112,755		9,082		5,848,435
Total	$	214,312,139	$	9,895,813	$	662,990	$	223,544,961

Amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities held to maturity are as follows:

	September 30, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	7,585,671	$	897,882	$	-	$	8,483,553

Total	$	7,585,671	$	897,882	$	-	$	8,483,553

	December 31, 2010
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value

Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	7,715,123	$	582,269	$	-	$	8,297,392

Total	$	7,715,123	$	582,269	$	-	$	8,297,392

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities are shown by expected maturity.

Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay

obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties:

	September 30, 2011
	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Within One Year	$	45,528,688	$	45,906,777	$	2,048,903	$	2,083,328
After One, But Within Five Years		193,393,110		200,601,911		3,580,269		4,007,464
After Five, But Within Ten Years		21,308,173		22,862,763		1,956,499		2,392,761
After Ten Years		4,459,688		4,281,223		-		-
Total	$	264,689,659	$	273,652,674	$	7,585,671	$	8,483,553

Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended

September 30, 2011 were $11,085,156 and $67,741,210, respectively. Realized gross gains on these

sales and calls were $428,882 and $1,108,091 during the three and nine month periods ended September

30, 2011, respectively. There were no sales or calls of securities available for sale that resulted in losses

for the three or nine-months ended September 30, 2011.

Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended

September 30, 2010, were $20,000,000 and $50,440,459, respectively. There were no realized gross

gains on these sales and calls were during the three month period ended September 30, 2010 and

realized gross gains on these sales and calls were $451,094 during nine month period ended September

30, 2010. There were no sales or calls of securities available for sale that resulted in losses for the three

or nine-months ended September 30, 2010.

The following table summarizes the investment securities available for sale and held to maturity with

unrealized losses at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 by aggregated major security type and

length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position:

	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
September 30, 2011	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Obligations of U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	$	14,874,740		25,260	$	-	$	-	$	14,874,740	$	25,260
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		187,675	$	510		-		-		187,675		510
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1,167,696		760		-		-		1,167,696		760
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		363,989		3,189		-		-		363,989		3,189
Corporate bonds and notes		5,308,085		159,341		-		-		5,308,085		159,341
Trust preferred securities		-		-		294,910		360,735		294,910		360,735
Corporate stocks		3,353		285		35,703		14,289		39,056		14,574
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	21,905,538	$	189,345	$	330,613	$	375,024	$	22,236,151	$	564,369


	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
December 31, 2010	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Obligations of U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	$	25,543,154	$	211,829	$	-	$	-	$	25,543,154	$	211,829
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		844,587		2,672		-		-		844,587		2,672
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		7,746,912		50,947		-		-		7,746,912		50,947
Trust preferred securities		-		-		334,585		388,460		334,585		388,460
Corporate stocks		-		-		40,910		9,082		40,910		9,082
	$	34,134,653	$	265,448	$	375,495	$	397,542	$	34,510,148	$	662,990

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

In determining OTTI for debt securities, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length

of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and

near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic

conditions, and (4) whether the Corporation has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than

not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether

an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based

on the information available to management at a point in time.

In order to determine OTTI for purchased beneficial interests, the Corporation compares the present

value of the remaining cash flows as estimated at the preceding evaluation date to the current expected

remaining cash flows. OTTI is deemed to have occurred if there has been an adverse change in the

remaining expected future cash flows.

When OTTI occurs, for either debt securities or purchased beneficial interests, the amount of the OTTI

recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the security or more likely than not

will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period

credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before

recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss, the OTTI shall be recognized in

earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at

the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not

that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any

current-period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the

amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined

based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The

amount of the total OTTI related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of

applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the

new amortized cost basis of the investment.

As of September 30, 2011, the majority of the Corporation's unrealized losses in the investment

securities portfolio related to two pooled trust preferred securities. The decline in fair value on these

securities is primarily attributable to the financial crisis and resulting credit deterioration and financial

condition of the underlying issuers, all of which are financial institutions. This deterioration may affect

the future receipt of both principal and interest payments on these securities. This fact combined with

the current illiquidity in the market makes it unlikely that the Corporation would be able to recover its

investment in these securities if the securities were sold at this time. One of these securities has been

previously written down through the income statement to an amount considered to be immaterial to the

financial statements. Therefore management is no longer analyzing this security for further impairment.

Our analysis of these investments includes $629 thousand book value of a collateralized debt obligation

("CDO") consisting is a pooled trust preferred security. This security was rated high quality at inception, but
at September 30, 2011 Moody's rated this security as Caa3, which is defined as substantial risk of
default. The Corporation uses the OTTI evaluation model to compare the present value of expected cash
flows to the previous estimate to determine if there are adverse changes in cash flows during the quarter.
The OTTI model considers the structure and term of the CDO and the financial condition of the

underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes

and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers,

and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is

based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including

announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities.

Assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates and prepayments. We assume no

recoveries on defaults and treat all interest payment deferrals as defaults.

In determining the amount of "currently performing" collateral for the purposes of modeling the

expected future cash flows, management analyzed the default and deferral history over the past 3 years.

This review indicated significant increases in the number and amount of defaults and deferrals by the

issuers. Additionally, management has noted the correlation between the rising levels of non-

performing loans as a percent of tangible equity plus loan loss reserves by those issuers that have

defaulted and/or deferred interest payments. Therefore management has used this ratio as a primary

indicator to project the levels of future defaults for modeling purposes. Management recognizes the

potential of defaults and deferrals to continue over the next 12 to 24 months. The operating environment

remains difficult for community and regional banks in many parts of the country, which could lead to

higher default and deferral levels. Seventy-four depository institutions were closed by regulators during

the first nine months of 2011.

The following table provides detailed information related to the pooled trust preferred security analyzed

at September 30, 2011:

Description	Actual Deferrals as % of Outstanding Collateral	Actual Defaults as % of Original Collateral	Excess Subordination as % of Performing Collateral	Expected Additional Defaults as % of Performing Collateral

TPREF Funding II, Ltd. (Class B)	17.90%	16.06%	-44.27%	16.14%

In the table above, "Excess Subordination as % of Performing Collateral" was calculated by dividing the

difference between the total face value of performing collateral less the face value of all outstanding

note balances not subordinate to our investment, by the total face value of performing collateral. This

ratio measures the extent to which there may be tranches within a pooled trust preferred structure

available to absorb credit losses before the Corporation’s security would be impacted. As mentioned

earlier, the levels of defaults and deferrals in this pool has increased significantly in recent months,

which have resulted in a significant reduction in the amount of performing collateral. As a result, the

negative Excess Subordination as a % of Performing Collateral percentages shown above indicate there

is no support from subordinate tranches available to absorb losses before the Corporation’s security

would be impacted. A negative ratio is not the only factor to consider when determining if OTTI should

be recorded. Other factors affect the timing and amount of cash flows available for payments to

investors such as the excess interest paid by the issuers, as issuers typically pay higher rates of interest

than are paid out to investors.

Upon completion of the September 30, 2011 analysis, our model indicated an additional other-than-

temporary impairment of $67 thousand on the TPREF Funding II security. This security remained

classified as available for sale and represented $352 thousand of the unrealized losses reported at

September 30, 2011. Payments continue to be made as agreed on the TPREF Funding II security.

When the analysis was conducted at September 30, 2011, the present value of expected future cash

flows using a discount rate equal to the yield in effect at the time of purchase was compared to the

previous quarters' analysis. This analysis indicated a further decline in value attributed to credit related

factors stemming from further deterioration in the underlying collateral payment streams. Additionally,

to estimate fair value the present value of the expected future cash flows was calculated using a current

estimated discount rate that a willing market participant might use to value the security based on current

market conditions and interest rates. This comparison indicated a slight decrease in value during the

quarter, based on factors other than credit, which resulted in a loss reported in other comprehensive

income. Changes in credit quality may or may not correlate to changes in the overall fair value of the

impaired securities as the change in credit quality is only one component in assessing the overall fair

value of the impaired securities. Therefore, the recognition of additional credit related OTTI could

result in a gain reported in other comprehensive income. Total other-than-temporary impairment

recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income was $220,459 and $265,018 for securities

available for sale at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively.

The table below presents a roll forward of the cumulative credit losses recognized in earnings for the

three and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	2011		2010
Beginning balance, January 1,	$	3,438,673	$	3,045,668
Amounts related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized		-		-
Additions/Subtractions:
Amounts realized for securities sold during the period		-		-
Amounts related to securities for which the company intends to sell or that it will be more likely than not that the company will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost basis		-		-
Reductions for increase in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security		-		-
Increases to the amount related to the credit loss for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized		67,400		393,005

Ending balance, September 30,	$	3,506,073	$	3,438,673

Beginning balance, July 1,	$	3,438,673	$	3,382,293
Amounts related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized		-		-
Additions/Subtractions:
Amounts realized for securities sold during the period		-		-
Amounts related to securities for which the company intends to sell or that it will be more likely than not that the company will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost basis		-		-
Reductions for increase in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security		-		-
Increases to the amount related to the credit loss for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized		67,400		56,380

Ending balance, September 30,	$	3,506,073	$	3,438,673

9. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

The composition of the loan portfolio is summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	147,815,433	$	114,697,440
Commercial mortgages		250,030,218		133,070,484
Residential mortgages		194,260,610		173,467,806
Indirect consumer loans		96,093,955		98,940,854
Consumer loans		100,258,360		93,507,785

	$	788,458,576	$	613,684,369

Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the

collectability of all or a portion of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that

management believes will be adequate to absorb probable incurred losses on existing loans.

Management's evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is performed on a periodic

basis and takes into consideration such factors as the credit risk grade assigned to the loan, historical

loan loss experience and review of specific problem loans (including evaluations of the underlying

collateral). Historical loss experience is adjusted by management based on their judgment as to the

current impact of qualitative factors including changes in the composition and volume of the loan

portfolio, overall portfolio quality, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers'

ability to pay. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable

incurred losses. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future

additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition,

various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the

Corporation's allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to recognize

additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of

their examination.

Management, after considering current information and events regarding a borrower's ability to repay its

obligations, classifies a loan as impaired when it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to

collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. If a loan is impaired, a

portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated

future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected

solely from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and

residential real estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not

separately identified for impairment disclosures. Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified

for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using

the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be a collateral

dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt

restructurings that subsequently default, the Corporation determines the amount of reserve in accordance

with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.

The general component of the allowance for loan losses covers non-impaired loans and is based on

historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. Loans not impaired but classified as substandard

and special mention use a historical loss factor on a rolling five year history of net losses. For all other

unclassified loans, the historical loss experience is determined by portfolio class and is based on the

actual loss history experienced by the Corporation over the most recent two years. This actual loss

experience is supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio

class. These economic factors include consideration of the following: levels of and trends in

delinquencies and impaired loans; levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume

and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in

lending policies, procedures, and practices; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and

other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects

of changes in credit concentrations. The following portfolio segments have been identified: commercial,

financial and agricultural; commercial mortgages; residential mortgages; and consumer loans.

Risk Characteristics

Commercial, financial and agricultural loans primarily consist of loans to small to mid-sized businesses

in our market area in a diverse range of industries. These loans are of higher risk and typically are made

on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business.

Further, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may

fluctuate in value. The credit risk related to commercial loans is largely influenced by general economic

conditions and the resulting impact on a borrower’s operations or on the value of underlying collateral,

if any.

Commercial mortgage loans generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than

residential mortgage loans, inferring higher potential losses on an individual customer basis. Loan

repayment is often dependent on the successful operation and management of the properties and/or the

businesses occupying the properties, as well as on the collateral securing the loan. Economic events or

conditions in the real estate market could have an adverse impact on the cash flows generated by

properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate loans and on the value of such properties.

Residential mortgage loans are generally made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment

from his or her employment and other income, but are secured by real property whose value tends to be

more easily ascertainable. Credit risk for these types of loans is generally influenced by general

economic conditions, the characteristics of individual borrowers and the nature of the loan collateral.

The consumer loan segment includes home equity lines of credit and home equity loans, which exhibit

many of the same risk characteristics as residential mortgages. Indirect and other consumer loans may

entail greater credit risk than residential mortgage and home equity loans, particularly in the case of

other consumer loans which are unsecured or, in the case of indirect consumer loans, secured by

depreciable assets, such as automobiles or boats. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted

consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. In

addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, thus

are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances such as job loss, illness or personal

bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and

insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

No allowance for loan losses was recorded as of September 30, 2011 for loans acquired as part of the

FOFC merger. These loans were recorded at fair value at the time of the acquisition.

Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment was as follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses	Commercial, Financial and Agricultural			Commercial Mortgages			Residential Mortgages			Consumer Loans			Unallocated			Total
Beginning balance:	$	2,118,299		$	2,575,058		$	1,301,780		$	2,727,022		$	775,972		$	9,498,131
Charge Offs:		(593,995	)		(3,764	)		(39,312	)		(542,621	)		-			(1,179,692	)
Recoveries:		314,797			33,304			30,324			146,726			-			525,151
Net charge offs		(279,198	)		29,540			(8,988	)		(395,895	)		-			(654,541	)
Provision		1,444,245			(69,375	)		(61,068	)		(184,348	)		(296,121	)		833,333
Ending balance	$	3,283,346		$	2,535,223		$	1,231,724		$	2,146,779		$	479,851		$	9,676,923

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses	Commercial, Financial and Agricultural			Commercial Mortgages			Residential Mortgages			Consumer Loans			Unallocated			Total
Beginning balance:	$	3,081,433		$	2,612,655		$	1,246,880		$	2,297,459		$	517,245		$	9,755,672
Charge Offs:		(590,992	)		-			(39,312	)		(201,966	)		-			(832,270	)
Recoveries:		109,391			7,201			-			53,596			-			170,188
Net charge offs		(481,601	)		7,201			(39,312	)		(148,370	)		-			(662,082	)
Provision		683,514			(84,633	)		24,156			(2,310	)		(37,394	)		583,333
Ending balance	$	3,283,346		$	2,535,223		$	1,231,724		$	2,146,779		$	479,851		$	9,676,923

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Beginning balance:	$	10,447,291		$	9,967,223
Charge offs:		(1,298,599	)		(1,883,840	)
Recoveries:		136,369			451,678
Net charge offs		(1,162,230	)		(1,432,162	)
Provision		375,000			1,125,000
Ending balance	$	9,660,061		$	9,660,061

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in

loans by portfolio segment based on impairment method as of September 30, 2011 and December 31,

2010. The recorded investment excludes loans acquired in the FOFC merger.

	September 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses	Commercial, Financial and Agricultural		Commercial Mortgages		Residential Mortgages		Consumer Loans		Unallocated		Total
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,302,878	$	283,865	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,586,743
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,980,468		2,251,358		1,231,724		2,146,779		479,851		8,090,180
Total ending allowance balance	$	3,283,346	$	2,535,223	$	1,231,724	$	2,146,779	$	479,851	$	9,676,923

	December 31, 2010
Allowance for loan losses		Commercial, Financial and Agricultural		Commercial Mortgages		Residential Mortgages		Consumer Loans		Unallocated		Total
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment		$	23,524	$	216,234	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	239,758
Collectively evaluated for impairment			2,094,775		2,358,824		1,301,780		2,727,022		775,972		9,258,373
Total ending allowance balance		$	2,118,299	$	2,575,058	$	1,301,780	$	2,727,022	$	775,972	$	9,498,131

	September 30, 2011
Loans:	Commercial, Financial and Agricultural		Commercial Mortgages		Residential Mortgages		Consumer Loans		Total
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,975,639	$	4,399,423	$	182,117	$	-	$	9,557,179
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		114,832,632		153,065,673		173,346,567		190,465,243	$	631,710,115
Total ending loans balance	$	119,808,271	$	157,465,096	$	173,528,684	$	190,465,243	$	641,267,294

	December 31, 2010
Loans:	Commercial, Financial and Agricultural		Commercial Mortgages		Residential Mortgages		Consumer Loans		Total
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,215,761	$	4,450,882	$	408,392	$	-	$	8,075,035
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		111,778,238		128,963,664		173,465,831		193,098,341		607,306,074
Total ending loans balance	$	114,993,999	$	133,414,546	$	173,874,223	$	193,098,341	$	615,381,109

The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment recognized by class of loans as

of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the average recorded investment and interest income

recognized by class of loans as of the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2011:

	September 30, 2011						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011						Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated		Recorded Investment			Average Recorded Investment			Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment	Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial	$	2,968,386	$	-	$	2,971,036		$	3,100,655	$	25,049	$	3,032,483	$	6,290
Commercial mortgages:
Construction		10,739		-		10,739			24,490		-		20,602		-
Other		3,310,502		-		3,307,483			3,447,948		-		3,397,079		-
Residential mortgages		181,705		-		182,117			307,997		-		257,799		-
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial		2,004,588		1,302,878		2,004,603			1,953,474		82,548		2,918,444		82,548
Commercial mortgages:
Construction		11,261		11,261		11,261			27,351		-		15,557		-
Other		1,072,472		272,604		1,069,940			821,994		17,070		823,995		17,070
Total	$	9,559,653	$	1,586,743	$	9,557,179		$	9,683,909	$	124,667	$	10,465,959	$	105,908

	December 31, 2010
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated		Recorded Investment		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial	$	4,334,095	$	-	$	3,192,227	$	1,876,603	$	73,657
Commercial mortgages:
Construction		32,266		-		32,266		8,067		-
Other		4,148,423		-		3,549,686		3,374,678		63,061
Residential mortgages		407,105		-		408,392		309,537		21,324
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial		23,524		23,524		23,534		1,393,995		386
Agricultural		-		-		-		6,211		453
Commercial mortgages:
Construction		50,939		43,514		50,939		215,901		-
Other		838,277		172,720		817,991		1,378,687		969
Residential mortgages		-		-		-		215,299		6,470
Total	$	9,834,629	$	239,758	$	8,075,035	$	8,778,978	$	166,320

The following table presents the recorded investment in non accrual and loans past due over 90 days still

on accrual by class of loans. This table includes loans acquired in the FOFC merger, except those loans

with evidence of credit deterioration at the time of the merger.

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Non-Accrual		Loans Past Due Over 90 Days Still Accruing		Non-Accrual		Loans Past Due Over 90 Days Still Accruing
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial	$	5,251,391	$	3,643	$	2,938,174	$	-
Commercial mortgages		-		-		-		-
Construction		22,000		7,059,479		83,204		-
Other		6,030,548		-		4,230,701		-
Residential mortgages		2,357,889		-		2,558,534		-
Consumer loans
Credit cards		-		5,512		-		11,174
Home equity lines & loans		526,052		-		545,039		-
Indirect consumer loans		16,196		-		180,632		-
Other direct consumer loans		159,244		-		61,601		-
Total	$	14,363,320	$	7,068,634	$	10,597,886	$	11,174

The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in loans past due (including non-accrual loans) by class of loans as of

September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and by loans originated by the Corporation (referred to as “Legacy” loans) and loans acquired in

the FOFC merger (referred to as “Acquired” loans) which are further discussed in Note 5:

	September 30, 2011
Legacy Loans:	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due			Loans Acquired with deteriorated credit quality	Loans Not Past Due			Total
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial	$	139,590	$	7,743	$	2,918,608	$	3,065,941	$	-	$	116,236,537	$	119,302,478
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		505,792		505,792
Commercial mortgages:
Construction		-		-		-		-		-		7,525,126		7,525,126
Other		88,266		-		3,103,796		3,192,062		-		146,747,908		149,939,970
Residential mortgages		1,547,675		455,525		938,554		2,941,754		-		170,586,931		173,528,685
Consumer loans:
Credit cards		3,558		2,767		5,511		11,836		-		1,857,860		1,869,696
Home equity lines & loans		140,297		-		260,318		400,615		-		77,462,639		77,863,254
Indirect consumer loans		342,674		90,812		141,792		575,278		-		95,813,548		96,388,826
Other direct consumer loans		64,409		7,980		2,835		75,224		-		14,268,243		14,343,467
Total	$	2,326,469	$	564,827	$	7,371,414	$	10,262,710	$	-	$	631,004,584	$	641,267,294

	September 30, 2011
Acquired Loans:	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due			Loans Acquired with deteriorated credit quality	Loans Not Past Due			Total
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial	$	230,548	$	984,202	$	198,877	$	1,413,627	$	1,591,772	$	26,996,570	$	30,001,969
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial mortgages:
Construction		18,884		423,882		7,059,479		7,502,245		2,305,549		2,907,182		12,714,976
Other		154,383		197,441		1,653,124		2,004,948		11,248,658		65,645,166		78,898,772
Residential mortgages		474,152		65,364		85,181		624,697		222,580		20,547,566		21,394,843
Consumer loans:
Credit cards		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Home equity lines & loans		-		-		-		-		-		6,199,175		6,199,175
Indirect consumer loans		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Other direct consumer loans		-		-		-		-		-		139,238		139,238
Total	$	877,967	$	1,670,889	$	8,996,661	$	11,545,517	$	15,368,559	$	122,434,897	$	149,348,973

	December 31, 2010
Legacy Loans:	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Loans Not Past Due		Total
Commercial, financial and agricultural
Commercial & industrial	$	33,434	$	17,351	$	2,914,640	$	2,965,425	$	111,202,073	$	114,167,498
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		826,501		826,501
Commercial mortgages
Construction		-		-		63,102		63,102		9,029,450		9,092,552
Other		116,432		-		2,913,525		3,029,957		121,292,041		124,321,998
Residential mortgages		1,851,412		277,276		1,404,067		3,532,755		170,341,467		173,874,222
Consumer loans
Credit cards		4,889		16,635		11,174		32,698		1,989,199		2,021,897
Home equity lines & loans		550,134		79,910		321,116		951,160		76,052,290		77,003,450
Indirect consumer loans		465,818		154,969		146,221		767,008		98,571,142		99,338,150
Other direct consumer loans		51,125		12,502		41,964		105,591		14,629,253		14,734,844
Total	$	3,073,244	$	558,643	$	7,815,809	$	11,447,696	$	603,933,416	$	615,381,112

Troubled Debt Restructurings :

The Corporation has not allocated any specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been

modified in troubled debt restructurings as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. The

Corporation has not committed to lend any additional amounts as of September 30, 2011 or December

31, 2010 to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as trouble debt restructurings.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, no loans were modified as troubled debt

restructurings by the Corporation. Additionally, there were no payment defaults on any loans previously

modified as troubled debt restructurings within twelve months following the modification. A loan is

considered to be in payment default once it is 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms.

Credit Quality Indicators :

The Corporation categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of

borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience,

credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The

Corporation analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes

new consumer, mortgage and home equity loans and lines with outstanding balances greater than $50

thousand, $250 thousand and $100 thousand, respectively, along with a sample of existing loans and

non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial and commercial real estate loans. The loans meeting these

criteria are reviewed at least annually. The Corporation uses the following definitions for risk rating:

Special Mention – Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves

management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration

of the repayment prospects for the loan or the institution’s credit position as some future date.

Substandard – Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and

paying capability of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-

defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by

the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as

substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on

the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described

process are considered to be pass rated loans. Based on the analysis’s performed as of September 30,

2011 and December 31, 2010, the risk category of the recorded investment of loans by class of loans is

as follows:

	September 30, 2011
Legacy Loans:	Not Rated		Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial	$	-	$	98,332,680	$	12,549,673	$	4,865,665	$	3,554,460
Agricultural		-		505,792		-		-		-
Commercial mortgages:
Construction		-		6,492,114		211,583		481,927		339,502
Other		-		134,922,194		6,805,611		7,660,502		551,663
Residential mortgages		171,275,866		-		-		2,252,819		-
Consumer loans:
Credit cards		1,869,696		-		-		-		-
Home equity lines & loans		77,337,201		-		-		526,053		-
Indirect consumer loans		96,223,075		-		-		165,751		-
Other direct consumer loans		14,327,271		-		-		16,196		-
Total	$	361,033,109	$	240,252,780	$	19,566,867	$	15,968,913	$	4,445,625

Acquired Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial	$	-	$	27,771,057	$	617,784	$	21,356	$	-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial mortgages:
Construction		-		5,360,446		3,858,838		1,190,143		-
Other		-		65,659,894		636,087		1,354,133		-
Residential mortgages		21,087,082		-		-		85,181		-
Consumer loans:
Credit cards		-		-		-		-		-
Home equity lines & loans		6,199,175		-		-		-		-
Indirect consumer loans		-		-		-		-		-
Other direct consumer loans		139,238		-		-		-		-
Total	$	27,425,495	$	98,791,397	$	5,112,709	$	2,650,813	$	-

	December 31, 2010
Legacy Loans:	Not Rated		Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful
Commercial, financial and agricultural:
Commercial & industrial	$	-	$	90,887,538	$	16,946,891	$	4,770,276	$	1,562,794
Agricultural		-		824,882		1,619		-		-
Commercial mortgages:
Construction		-		7,497,488		672,136		922,928		-
Other		-		108,732,393		7,245,641		8,343,964		-
Residential mortgages		171,024,544		-		-		2,849,678		-
Consumer loans:
Credit cards		2,021,896		-		-		-		-
Home equity lines & loans		76,458,414		-		-		545,037		-
Indirect consumer loans		99,155,306		-		-		77,883		-
Other direct consumer loans		14,656,690		-		-		182,844		-
Total	$	363,317,120	$	207,942,301	$	24,866,287	$	17,692,610	$	1,562,794

The Corporation considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan

losses. For residential and consumer loan classes, the Corporation also evaluates credit quality based on

the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity. The following

table presents the recorded investment in residential and consumer loans based on payment activity as of

September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011
			Consumer Loans
Legacy Loans:	Residential Mortgages		Credit Card		Home Equity Lines & Loans		Indirect Consumer Loans		Other Direct Consumer Loans
Performing	$	171,255,977	$	1,864,184	$	77,337,202	$	96,229,582	$	14,327,271
Non-Performing		2,272,707		5,512		526,052		159,244		16,196
		173,528,684		1,869,696		77,863,254		96,388,826		14,343,467

Acquired Loans:
Performing	$	21,309,662	$	-	$	6,199,175	$	-	$	139,238
Non-Performing		85,181		-		-		-		-
Total	$	21,394,843	$	-	$	6,199,175	$	-	$	139,238

	December 31, 2010
			Consumer Loans
Legacy Loans:	Residential Mortgages		Credit Card		Home Equity Lines & Loans		Indirect Consumer Loans		Other Direct Consumer Loans
Performing	$	171,070,881	$	2,010,723	$	76,458,413	$	99,157,518	$	14,673,243
Non-Performing		2,803,342		11,174		545,037		186,632		61,601
Total	$	173,874,223	$	2,021,897	$	77,003,450	$	99,338,150	$	14,734,844

10. Components of Quarterly and Year-to-Date Net Periodic Benefit Costs

	Nine Months Ended September 30,							Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011				2010			2011			2010
Qualified Pension
Service cost, benefits earned during the period	$	777,402		$	677,654		$	259,134		$	144,938
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		1,178,868			1,137,613			392,956			179,589
Expected return on plan assets		(1,757,019	)		(1,690,066	)		(585,673	)		(301,794	)
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation		-			-			-			-
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost		22,410			34,417			7,470			6,021
Amortization of unrecognized net loss		507,339			410,788			169,113			41,652
Net periodic pension expense	$	729,000		$	570,406		$	243,000		$	70,406

Supplemental Pension
Service cost, benefits earned during the period	$	22,968		$	23,314			7,656		$	6,800
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		40,330			42,949			13,443			12,525
Expected return on plan assets		-			-			-			-
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost		-			-			-			-
Amortization of unrecognized net loss		7,098			4,322			2,366			1,260
Net periodic supplemental pension expense	$	70,396		$	70,585		$	23,465		$	20,585

Postretirement, Medical and Life
Service cost, benefits earned during the period	$	24,750		$	22,500			8,250		$	7,500
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		56,250			56,250			18,750			18,750
Expected return on plan assets		-			-			-			-
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost		(72,750	)		(71,250	)		(24,250	)		(23,750	)
Amortization of unrecognized net gain		-			-			-
Net periodic postretirement, medical and life expense	$	8,250		$	7,500		$	2,750		$	2,500

On April 21, 2010, the Corporation's Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Corporation’s
Defined Benefit Pension Plan. Under the amendment, which became effective on July 1, 2010, new

employees hired on or after the effective date will not be eligible to participate in the plan, however,

existing participants at that time will continue to accrue benefits. The Corporation anticipates that over

time the amendment will result in a decrease in the future benefit obligations of the plan and the

corresponding net periodic benefit cost associated with the plan.

11. Segment Reporting

The Corporation manages its operations through two primary business segments: core banking and trust and investment advisory services. The core

banking segment provides revenues by attracting deposits from the general public and using such funds to originate consumer, commercial, commercial

real estate, and residential mortgage loans, primarily in the Corporation's local markets and to invest in securities. The trust and investment advisory

services segment provides revenues by providing trust and investment advisory services to clients.

Summarized financial information concerning the Corporation’s reportable segments and the reconciliation to the Corporation’s consolidated results is

shown in the following table. Income taxes are allocated based on the separate taxable income of each entity and indirect overhead expenses are allocated

based on reasonable and equitable allocations applicable to the reportable segment. Holding company amounts are the primary differences between

segment amounts and consolidated totals, and are reflected in the Holding Company and Other column below, along with amounts to eliminate

transactions between segments. (dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011										Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Core Banking		Trust & Investment Advisory Services			Holding Company And Other			Consolidated Totals		Core Banking		Trust & Investment Advisory Services			Holding Company And Other		Consolidated Totals
Net interest income	$	11,842	$	-		$	1		$	11,843	$	31,834	$	-		$	6	$	31,840
Provision for loan losses		583		-			-			583		833		-			-		833
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		11,259		-			1			11,260		31,001		-			6		31,007
Other operating income		2,465		1,747			116			4,328		7,284		5,131			1,005		13,420
Other operating expenses		8,638		1,843			136			10,617		27,259		5,450			553		33,262
Income or (loss) before income tax expense		5,086		(96	)		(19	)		4,971		11,026		(319	)		458		11,165
Income tax expense (benefit)		1,742		(37	)		(25	)		1,680		3,589		(123	)		123		3,589
Segment net income (loss)	$	3,344	$	(59	)	$	6		$	3,291	$	7,437	$	(196	)	$	335	$	7,576
Segment assets											$	1,257,067	$	5,856		$	3,001	$	1,265,924

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010									Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Core Banking		Trust & Investment Advisory Services		Holding Company And Other			Consolidated Totals		Core Banking		Trust & Investment Advisory Services		Holding Company And Other			Consolidated Totals
Net interest income	$	8,681	$	-	$	-		$	8,681	$	25,969	$	-	$	3		$	25,972
Provision for loan losses		375		-		-			375		1,125		-		-			1,125
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		8,306		-		-			8,305		24,844		-		3			24,847
Other operating income		1,911		2,184		152			4,247		6,201		6,257		449			12,907
Other operating expenses		7,047		1,710		125			8,882		21,728		5,309		506			27,543
Income or (loss) before income tax expense		3,170		474		(27	)		3,671		9,317		948		(54	)		10,211
Income tax expense (benefit)		942		183		(5	)		1,120		2,862		367		(72	)		3,157
Segment net income (loss)	$	2,228	$	291	$	32		$	2,551	$	6,455	$	581	$	(18	)	$	7,054
Segment assets										$	962,145	$	7,464	$	3,091		$	972,700

12. Stock Based Compensation

Board of Director’s Stock Compensation

Members of the Board of Directors receive common shares of the Corporation equal in value to the

amount of fees individually earned during the previous year for service as a director. The common

shares are distributed to the Corporation's individual board members from treasury shares of the

Corporation on or about January 15 following the calendar year of service.

Additionally, the President and CEO of the Corporation, who does not receive cash compensation as a

member of the Board of Directors, is awarded common shares equal in value to the average of those

awarded to board members not employed by the Corporation who have served for twelve (12) months

during the prior year.

An expense of $231 thousand related to this compensation was recognized during the year of 2010.

During January 2011, 10,378 shares were re-issued from treasury to fund the stock component of

directors' compensation.

Restricted Stock Plan

On June 16, 2010, the Corporation's Board of Directors approved the Corporation's Restricted Stock

Plan (the "Plan"), which became effective immediately. Pursuant to the Plan, the Corporation may make

discretionary grants of restricted stock to officers other than the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer.

Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the

stock at issue date. The maximum number of shares as to which stock awards may be granted under the

Plan is 10,000 per year, with these shares vesting over a 5 year period.

A summary of restricted stock activity from December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011 is presented below:

	Shares	Weighted–Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2010	5,886	$21.25
Granted	2,087	22.98
Vested	-	-
Forfeited or Cancelled	-	-
Nonvested at September 30, 2011	7,973	$21.52

As of September 30, 2011, there was $150,660 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to

nonvested shares granted under the Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average

period of 4.83 years.

Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The review that follows focuses on the significant factors affecting the financial condition and results of

operations of the Corporation during the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, with

comparisons to the comparable periods in 2010, as applicable. The following discussion and the

unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and related notes included in this report should be

read in conjunction with our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and

Exchange Commission on March 16, 2011. The results for the periods presented are not necessarily

indicative of results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other interim period.

Forward-looking Statements

This discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities

Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Corporation intends its forward-

looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in these

sections. All statements regarding the Corporation's expected financial position and operating results, the

Corporation's business strategy, the Corporation's financial plans, forecasted demographic and economic

trends relating to the Corporation's industry and similar matters are forward-looking statements. These

statements can sometimes be identified by the Corporation's use of forward-looking words such as "may,"

"will," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," or "intend." The Corporation cannot promise that its expectations

in such forward-looking statements will turn out to be correct. The Corporation's actual results could be

materially different from expectations because of various factors, including changes in economic conditions

or interest rates, credit risk, difficulties in managing our growth, including those in connection with our

April 8, 2011 acquisition of Fort Orange Financial Corporation and the integration of its business with ours,

competition, changes in law or the regulatory environment, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform

and Consumer Protection Act, and changes in general business and economic trends. Information

concerning risks facing the Corporation can be found in our periodic filings with the Securities and

Exchange Commission, including in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These filings are available

publicly on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov, on the Corporation's website at

http://www.chemungcanal.com or upon request from the Corporate Secretary at (607) 737-3788. Except as

otherwise required by law, the Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise its

forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Risks and Uncertainties

Critical accounting policies include the areas where the Corporation has made what it considers to be

particularly difficult, subjective or complex judgments concerning estimates, and where these estimates

can significantly affect the Corporation's financial results under different assumptions and conditions.

The Corporation prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally

accepted in the United States of America. As a result, the Corporation is required to make certain

estimates, judgments and assumptions that it believes are reasonable based upon the information

available at that time. These estimates, judgments and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets

and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses

during the periods presented. Actual results could be different from these estimates.

Management considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance for loan losses to be a critical

accounting policy given the uncertainty in evaluating the level of the allowance required to cover

probable incurred credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, and the material effect that such judgments

can have on the Corporation's results of operations. While management's current evaluation of the

allowance for loan losses indicates that the allowance is adequate, under adversely different conditions

or assumptions the allowance would need to be increased. For example, if historical loan loss

experience significantly worsened or if current economic conditions significantly deteriorated,

additional provisions for loan losses would be required to increase the allowance. In addition, the

assumptions and estimates used in the internal reviews of the Corporation's non-performing loans and

potential problem loans, and the associated evaluation of the related collateral coverage for these loans,

has a significant impact on the overall analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Real

estate values in the Corporation’s market area did not increase dramatically in the prior several years,

and, as a result, any declines in real estate values have been modest. While management has concluded

that the current evaluation of collateral values is reasonable under the circumstances, if collateral

evaluations were significantly lowered, the Corporation's allowance for loan losses policy would also

require additional provisions for loan losses.

Management also considers the accounting policy relating to other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI")

of investment securities to be a critical accounting policy. The determination of whether a decline in

market value is other-than-temporary is necessarily a matter of subjective judgment. The timing and

amount of any realized losses reported in the Corporation's financial statements could vary if

management's conclusions were to change as to whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists. The

Corporation assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell

a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these

criteria is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized through a

charge to earnings. For those securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, such as those that

management has determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the amount of impairment charged

to earnings is limited to the amount related to credit losses, while impairment related to other factors is

recognized in other comprehensive income. Our analysis of these investments includes $629 thousand

book value of a collateralized debt obligation ("CDO") which is a pooled trust preferred security. This

security was rated high quality when purchased, but at September 30, 2011 Moody's rated this security

as Caa3 which is defined as substantial risk of default. The Corporation uses an OTTI evaluation model

to compare the present value of expected cash flows to the previous estimate to determine if there are

adverse changes in cash flows during the quarter. The OTTI model considers the structure and term of

the CDO and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest

rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and

principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The

current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant

market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying

trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates and

prepayments. We assume no recoveries on defaults and treat all interest payment deferrals as defaults.

Additional default assumptions were made based on credit quality ratios and performance measures of

the remaining financial institutions in the pools, as well as overall default rates based on historical bank

debt default rate averages. For the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, the

Corporation recognized $67 thousand in OTTI charges.

Management also considers the accounting policy relating to the valuation of goodwill and other

intangible assets to be a critical accounting policy. The initial carrying value of goodwill and other

intangible assets is determined using estimated fair values developed from various sources and other

generally accepted valuation techniques. Estimates are based upon financial, economic, market and

other conditions as they existed as of the date of a particular acquisition. These estimates of fair value

are the results of judgments made by the Corporation based upon estimates that are inherently uncertain

and changes in the assumptions upon which the estimates were based may have a significant impact on

the resulting estimates. In addition to the initial determination of the carrying value, on an ongoing basis

management must assess whether there is any impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets that

would require an adjustment in carrying value and recognition of a loss in the consolidated statement of

income.

Financial Condition

Consolidated assets at September 30, 2011 totaled $1.266 billion, an increase of $307.6 million or

32.1% since December 31, 2010. As discussed in greater detail below, this increase was due in large

part to the Corporation’s acquisition of Fort Orange Financial Corp. (“FOFC”) and the concurrent

merger of its banking subsidiary, Capital Bank & Trust Company (“Capital Bank”) into the Bank on

April 8, 2011, as well as other organic growth. The increase was reflected principally in a $174.8

million increase in loans, net of deferred fees and costs and unearned income, a $55.4 million increase in

the securities portfolio, a $57.9 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and increases in goodwill

and other intangible assets totaling $12.3 million and $1.8 million, respectively, as well as a $3.6 million

increase in other assets.

As noted above, total loans, net of deferred fees and costs and unearned income increased $174.8

million or 28.5% from December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011, principally due to the acquisition of

Capital Bank loans totaling $173.4 million at quarter-end. The most significant growth was in

commercial loans (including commercial mortgages), which increased $150.1 million, with $145.4

million of this increase associated with the Capital Bank acquisition. Residential mortgages increased

$20.8 million, including Capital Bank mortgages totaling $21.3 million at September 30, 2011. Total

consumer loans were up $3.9 million, principally due to a $7.2 million increase in home equity balances,

as home equity loans associated with the acquisition totaled $6.6 million at quarter-end. This increase

was offset primarily by a $2.8 million decrease in indirect consumer installment loans and a $306

thousand decrease in other consumer installment loans. During the first nine months of this year,

approximately $5.4 million of newly originated residential mortgages were sold in the secondary market

to Freddie Mac, with an additional $475 thousand originated and sold to the State of New York

Mortgage Agency.

The composition of the loan portfolio is summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	147,815,433	$	114,697,440
Commercial mortgages		250,030,218		133,070,484
Residential mortgages		194,260,610		173,467,806
Indirect Consumer loans		96,093,955		98,940,854
Consumer loans		100,258,360		93,507,785
Total loans, net of deferred origination fees and cost, and unearned income	$	788,458,576	$	613,684,369

The available for sale segment of the securities portfolio totaled $279.1 million at September 30, 2011, an

increase of approximately $55.5 million or 24.8% from December 31, 2010. At amortized cost, the

available for sale portfolio increased $51.1 million, including approximately $41.5 million of bonds related

to the Capital Bank acquisition. Unrealized appreciation related to the available for sale portfolio increased

$4.4 million since year-end 2010. The increase in the available for sale portfolio at amortized cost is

reflected principally in a $42.5 million increase in federal agency bonds, with $12.1 million of that total in

Capital Bank bonds. Municipal bonds were up $6.5 million, including $5.9 million of municipal bonds at

Capital Bank. Increases in collateralized mortgage obligations and SBA Guaranteed Loan Pools totaling

$8.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively, reflect investments acquired in the acquisition. A $2.4 million

increase in corporate bonds includes $3.0 million of investments acquired from Capital Bank. The above

increases were offset in part by a $6.4 million decrease in mortgage-backed securities and a $4.5 million

decrease in US Treasury bonds. The decrease in mortgage-backed securities reflects paydowns received

since year-end 2010, partially offset by mortgage-backed securities acquired from Capital Bank totaling

$9.9 million at September 30, 2011, while the decrease in US Treasuries was due to the sale of three bonds

during the year, offset in part by purchases totaling $30.3 million. The increase in unrealized appreciation

related to the available for sale portfolio was due in large part to the impact of lower mid-to long-term rates

on the various bond portfolios, offset in part by a decrease in unrealized gains in the Corporation’s equity

portfolio. The held to maturity portion of the portfolio, consisting of local municipal obligations,

decreased approximately $129 thousand from $7.7 million at December 31, 2010 to $7.6 million at

September 30, 2011.

As noted above, total cash and cash equivalents increased $57.9 million since December 31, 2010. With

a significant increase in deposits, as discussed below, exceeding the net increases in loans and securities,

as well as the addition of cash acquired in the Capital Bank acquisition, interest bearing deposits at other

financial institutions have increased $43.6 million since year-end. Additionally, cash and due from

financial institutions increased $14.2 million primarily due to an increased level of cash items in process

of collection. With total cash and cash equivalents of $118.5 million at September 30, 2011, the

Corporation continues to maintain a strong liquidity position and we continue to evaluate alternative

investment of these funds with caution given the low interest rate environment and the inherent interest

rate risk associated with longer term securities portfolio investments.

The $12.3 million increase in goodwill as well as the $1.8 million increase in other intangible assets was

directly related to the FOFC acquisition. The $1.8 million increase, net of amortization, in other

intangible assets includes $2.4 million in other intangibles associated with this acquisition, which the

Corporation is amortizing on an accelerated basis over a 10 year period.

A $3.6 million increase in other assets was due principally to a $1.3 million increase in accrued interest

receivable due in large part to the FOFC acquisition, a $464 thousand increase in net deferred tax assets,

a $687 thousand estimated income tax receivable related to the FOFC acquisition and a $537 thousand

increase in accounts receivable.

Since December 31, 2010, total deposits have increased $255.8 million or 32.5% to $1.042 billion, with

$177.8 million of this increase attributed to the FOFC acquisition, and $78.0 million due to organic

deposit growth. Non-interest bearing demand deposits increased $64.6 million, including balances at the

Capital Bank offices acquired totaling $25.5 million, along with increases in public funds and other non-

interest bearing demand deposits of $4.9 million and $34.2 million, respectively. A $191.2 million

increase in interest bearing balances was due principally to increases in savings and time deposit

balances of $72.8 million and $51.7 million, respectively, as well as a $47.8 million increase in NOW

accounts and an $18.9 million increase in insured money market account (“IMMA”) balances. The

$72.8 million increase in savings balances includes $58.9 million related to the FOFC acquisition as

well as increases in public fund and other balances totaling $4.3 million and $9.6 million, respectively,

while the $51.7 million increase in time deposits includes $59.1 million of Capital Bank deposits and a

$13.2 million increase in public fund balances, partially offset by decreases in other personal and non-

personal balances. The $47.8 million increase in NOW accounts was principally due to Capital Bank

balances totaling $23.0 million as well as a $23.3 million increase in public funds, while the $18.9

million increase in IMMA balances includes $11.3 million in Capital Bank deposits and a $9.9 million

increase in public fund balances offset by decreases in other personal and non-personal balances.

A $23.9 million increase in long term borrowings was due to the Corporation assuming the term debt of

Capital Bank.

The $31.3 million increase in total shareholders equity was due in large part to the issuance of 1,009,942

shares to acquire shares of former FOFC shareholders, which resulted in an increase in common stock and

additional paid-in-capital totaling $23.7 million. Other significant increases included a $4.4 million

increase in retained earnings and a $3.0 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Asset Quality

Non-Performing Loans

The recorded investment in non-performing loans at September 30, 2011 totaled $21.488 million

compared to $11.268 million at year-end 2010, an increase $10.220 million. Not included in the non-

performing loan totals are loans acquired in the FOFC acquisition which the Corporation has identified

as purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans totaling $15.369 million at September 30, 2011, which are

accounted for under separate accounting guidance, Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)

Subtopic 310-30, “Receivables – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality”

as disclosed in Note 9 of the interim financial statements. The increase in non-performing loans was due

to increases in non-accrual loans and loans 90 days or more past due totaling $3.765 million and $7.058

million, respectively, partially offset by a $603 thousand decrease in accruing troubled debt

restructurings (“TDRs”). The $3.765 million increase in non-accrual loans was due to a $4.052 million

increase in non-accruing commercial loans that was primarily due to the addition to non-accrual status

of two legacy loans totaling $2.543 million, as well as the addition to non-accrual status of loans

acquired in the FOFC acquisition totaling $1.980 million. These increases were offset in part by

principal reductions on other non-accrual commercial loans. The increase in non-accrual commercial

loans was partially offset by decreases in non-accrual residential mortgages, home equity and other

consumer loans totaling, $201 thousand, $19 thousand and $67 thousand, respectively. Included in the

non-accrual loan totals are commercial loans to one borrower totaling $5.192 million which carry

guarantees of the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") totaling $4.847 million, thereby

reducing the Corporation's remaining exposure on these loans to $345 thousand. It is generally the

Corporation's policy that a loan 90 days past due be placed in non-accrual status unless factors exist that

would eliminate the need to place a loan in this status. A loan may also be designated as non-accrual at

any time if payment of principal or interest in full is not expected due to deterioration in the financial

condition of the borrower. Loans remain in non-accrual status until the loans have been brought current

and remain current for a period of six months. In the case of non-accrual loans where a portion of the

loan has been charged off, the remaining balance is kept in non-accrual status until the entire principal

balance has been recovered.

Accruing loans 90 days or more past due totaled $7.069 million at September 30, 2011 compared to $11

thousand at year-end 2010, an increase of $7.058 million. This increase was due to loans not considered

by management to be PCI loans acquired in the FOFC acquisition, including $7.059 million of

construction loans that for a variety of reasons are 90 days or more past their stated maturity dates,

however the borrowers continue to make required interest payments. Additionally, these loans carry

third party credit enhancements, and based upon the strength of those credit enhancements, the

Corporation has not identified these loans as PCI loans and expects to incur no losses on these loans.

As noted above, accruing TDRs decreased $603 thousand since December 31, 2010 as during the first

nine months of this year a commercial loan totaling $137 thousand and three residential mortgages

totaling $245 thousand at December 31, 2010 were removed from TDR status in accordance with the

Corporation’s policy that TDRs that have continued to be in compliance with modified terms and

conditions for six months and yield a market rate at the time of restructuring not be reported as TDRs in

years subsequent to the year in which the loan was first reported as TDR. Additionally, $221 thousand

of principal reductions have been received on a commercial loan TDR. Concessions made on

commercial loan TDRs generally involve short term deferrals of principal payments, while residential

mortgage restructurings include interest rate and/or payment reductions. Overall, our past experience in

working with borrowers in restructuring troubled debt has been favorable. TDRs are evaluated for

impairment based upon the present value of expected future cash flows with any changes recorded

through the provision for loan losses.

At September 30, 2011, OREO totaled $661 thousand compared to $741 thousand at December 31,

2010, a decrease of $80 thousand. During the first nine months of this year four properties totaling $309

thousand were placed in OREO and two properties totaling $268 thousand were sold. Additionally,

during the third quarter of this year, the Corporation recognized a $12 thousand write-down on one

property following the receipt of an updated appraisal. The balance of the decrease was due to the

receipt of private mortgage insurance reimbursement on one property. At September 30, 2011, OREO

properties consisted of five residential properties totaling $349 thousand, two commercial properties

totaling $94 thousand and undeveloped land totaling $218 thousand.

Impaired Loans

Impaired loans, excluding residential real estate loans determined to be troubled debt restructurings, at

September 30, 2011 totaled $9.375 million compared to $7.667 million at December 31, 2010. Not

included in the impaired loan totals are loans acquired in the FOFC acquisition which the Corporation has

identified as PCI loans as these loans are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as noted under the

above discussion of non-performing loans. The increase of $1.708 million resulted principally from the

above-discussed increase in non-accrual commercial legacy loans, offset in part by decreases in other non-

accrual loans and accruing commercial loan TDR’s. Included in the impaired loan total are loans totaling

$3.086 million for which impairment allowances of $1.587 million have been specifically allocated to the

allowance for loan losses. As of December 31, 2010, the impaired loan total included $892 thousand of

loans for which specific impairment allowances of $240 thousand were allocated to the allowance for loan

losses. The increases in both the amount of impaired loans for which specific allowances were allocated to

the allowance for loan losses and the amount allocated were both primarily due to the above mentioned

addition to non-accrual loans of loans to two borrowers totaling $2.543 million. The majority of the

Corporation's impaired loans are secured and measured for impairment based on collateral evaluations. It is

the Corporation's policy to obtain updated appraisals on loans secured by real estate at the time a loan is

determined to be impaired. Prior to the receipt of the updated appraisal, an impairment measurement is

performed based upon the most recent appraisal on file to determine the amount of any specific allocation

or charge-off. Upon receipt and review of the updated appraisal, an additional measurement is performed to

determine if any adjustments are necessary to reflect the proper provisioning or charge-off. Impaired loans

are reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine if any changes in credit quality or market conditions would

require any additional allocation or recognition of additional charge-offs. If market conditions warrant,

future appraisals are obtained. Real estate values in the Corporation's market area had not increased

dramatically in the prior several years, and, as a result, declines in real estate values have been modest.

The appraisals are performed by independent third parties and reflect the properties market value "as is".

In determining the amount of any specific allocation or charge-off, the Corporation will make

adjustments to reflect the estimated costs to sell the property. In situations where partial charge-offs

have been recognized, any balance remaining continues to be reflected as non-performing until the

loan has been paid in full. In the case of impaired loans secured by assets other than real estate (i.e. business

assets), a collateral valuation is performed using data from the client's most recently received financial

statements, and applying discount rates based upon the type of collateral.

The following table summarizes the Corporation's recorded investment in non-performing assets:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Non-accrual loans	$	14,363	$	10,598
Troubled debt restructurings		56		659
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more		7,069		11
Total non-performing loans	$	21,488	$	11,268
Other real estate owned		661		741
Total non-performing assets	$	22,149	$	12,009

In addition to non-performing loans, as of September 30, 2011, the Corporation has identified

commercial relationships totaling $8.2 million as potential problem loans, as compared to $7.2 million at

December 31, 2010. This increase of $1.0 million resulted from the addition of three commercial

relationships totaling $4.0 million, including $1.4 million of loans acquired in the FOFC acquisition

which were not considered to be PCI loans, partially offset by downgrades of three relationships to non-

accrual status totaling $2.5 million, as well as principal reductions on other potential problem loans.

Potential problem loans are loans that are currently performing, but known information about possible

credit problems of the related borrowers causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of

such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms, which may result in the disclosure of

such loans as non-performing at some time in the future. Potential problem loans are typically loans that

are performing but are classified in the Corporation's loan rating system as "substandard." Management

cannot predict the extent to which economic conditions may worsen or other factors which may impact

borrowers and the potential problem loans. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that other loans will

not become 90 days or more past due, be placed on non-accrual, be restructured, or require increased

allowance coverage and provisions for loan losses.

Management's evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is performed on a periodic

basis and takes into consideration such factors as historical loan loss experience, review of specific

problem loans (including evaluation of the underlying collateral), changes in the composition and

volume of the loan portfolio, recent charge-off experience, overall portfolio quality and current

economic conditions that may affect the borrowers' ability to pay.

While impaired loans increased $1.708 million since year-end 2010, this increase, as noted above, was

due to the addition of two commercial relationships totaling approximately $2.543 million which was

the main factor behind a $1.347 million increase in specific allowances allocated against impaired loans.

With the exception of these relationships, overall credit quality has remained stable and we continue to

see signs of improvement as evidenced by improved credit quality of non-impaired loans and significant

reductions in net charge-offs with third quarter and year-to date net charge offs decreasing $500

thousand and $778 thousand, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. Based

upon an analysis of the factors mentioned above, the Corporation’s provision for loan losses for the third

quarter of this year totaled $583 thousand compared to $375 thousand for the third quarter of 2010, with

the year-to-date provision of $833 thousand down $292 thousand when compared to last year.

As noted above, net charge-offs for the first nine months of this year as compared to 2010 improved by

$778 thousand from $1.432 million in net charge-offs during the first nine months of last year to $654

thousand. This improvement was principally due to decreases in net commercial and consumer loan

charge-offs totaling $613 thousand and $138 thousand, respectively, as well as a $27 thousand decrease

in net residential mortgage charge-offs. At September 30, 2011, the Corporation's allowance for loan

losses totaled $9.677 million, resulting in a coverage ratio of allowance to non-performing loans of

45.0%. As noted above, included in non-performing loans at September 30, 2011 were loans which

carried USDA guarantees totaling $4.847 million. Also included in the non-performing loan totals are

other loans with remaining balances totaling $259 thousand on which the Corporation has previously

recognized partial charge-offs in the amount of $772 thousand. Excluding the USDA guaranteed

amount and other loans for which partial charge-offs have already been recognized from the non-

performing total, the coverage ratio of allowance to non-performing loans was 59.1%. This ratio as well

as the ratio of allowance to total loans was impacted by the Capital Bank acquisition, as current

accounting rules do not allow the acquirer to transfer the acquiree’s allowance for loan losses to the

acquirer’s balance sheet. Rather, the acquiree’s overall loan quality is a component in determining the

fair value of loans acquired, which are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. Excluding acquired

loans reported above as non-performing loans totaling $9.039 million, as well as the aforementioned

USDA guarantee and loans for which partial charge-offs have already been recognized, the allowance to

non-performing loan ratio was 131.8%. Excluding loans acquired in the Capital Bank acquisition, the

allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.51% and represents an amount that management believes

is adequate to absorb probable incurred loan losses on the Corporation's legacy loan portfolio.

The allocated portions of the allowance reflect management's estimates of specific known risk elements

in the respective portfolios. Management's methodology followed in evaluating the allowance for loan

losses includes a detailed analysis of historical loss factors for pools of similarly graded loans, as well as

specific collateral reviews of relationships graded special mention, substandard or doubtful with

outstanding balances of $1.0 million or greater. Among the factors considered in allocating portions of

the allowance by loan type are the current levels of past due, non-accrual and impaired loans, as well as

historical loss experience and the evaluation of collateral. In addition, management has formally

documented factors considered in determining the appropriate level of general reserves, including

current economic conditions, forecasted trends in the credit quality cycle, loan growth, entry into new

markets, and industry and peer group trends. These amounts have been included in the allocated portion

of the loan categories to which they relate.

At September 30, 2011, in addition to the qualitative factors allocated within the allowance, the

Corporation maintained $480 thousand of the allowance as unallocated. While some preliminary

improvements have been seen in the local economy and while some loans have improved, the recovery

is still very fragile and management believes it is prudent to see a longer period of sustained

improvement before completely reflecting this in the allowance. Additionally, management monitors

coverage ratios of nonperforming loans and total loans compared to peers on a regular basis. This

analysis also suggests that it would not be prudent to eliminate the unallocated portion of the allowance

at this time.

Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	9,498		$	9,967
Charge-offs:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		(594	)		(1,178	)
Commercial mortgages		(4	)		-
Residential mortgages		(39	)		(36	)
Consumer loans		(543	)		(670	)
Total		(1,180	)		(1,884	)
Recoveries:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		315			315
Commercial mortgages		33			-
Residential mortgages		30			-
Consumer loans		148			137
Total		526			452
Net charge-offs		(654	)		(1,432	)
Provision charged to operations		833			1,125

Balance at end of period	$	9,677		$	9,660

Results of Operations

Third Quarter of 2011 vs. Third Quarter of 2010

Net income for the third quarter of 2011 totaled $3.291 million, an increase of $740 thousand or 29.0%

as compared to third quarter 2010 net income of $2.551 million. Earnings per share were unchanged at

$0.71 per share on 1,035,115 additional average shares outstanding primarily resulting from the FOFC

acquisition. The increase in net income can be attributed to the Capital Bank acquisition, particularly

due to the increase in net interest income, as, excluding direct transaction costs during the quarter,

Capital Bank contributed an estimated $1.199 million in net income or $0.26 per share.

Net interest income compared to the third quarter of 2010 increased $3.162 million or 36.4% to $11.844

million, with the net interest margin increasing 33 basis points to 4.11%. We attribute this increase

principally to the Capital Bank acquisition which had a significant impact on a $230.8 million or 25.3%

increase in average earning assets, as well as a 9 basis point increase in the yield on average earning

assets and a 31 basis point decrease in the cost of average interest bearing liabilities. The $230.8 million

increase in average earning assets included a $197.0 million increase in average loans, with Capital

Bank loans accounting for $168.8 million of this increase, an $18.6 million increase in the average

investment portfolio and a $15.2 million increase in average interest bearing deposits. The third quarter

increase in the average investment portfolio included $44.9 million of average Capital Bank securities,

partially offset by a $26.3 million decrease in the average balances of other securities. While average

earning assets increased 25.3%, total interest and dividend income increased 27.8% or $2.953 million

with the yield on average earning assets increasing 9 basis points to 4.72%.

Total average funding liabilities, including non-interest bearing demand deposits, as compared to the third

quarter of last year, increased $218.3 million or 24.5% to $1.109 billion as average deposits and borrowings

increased $196.1 million and $22.2 million, respectively. In total, average non-interest bearing deposits

increased $57.8 million, with Capital Bank non-interest bearing deposits comprising $24.8 million of that

increase. Average interest bearing deposits increased $138.3 million due to $157.5 million in Capital Bank

average interest bearing deposits, offset by decreases in other average interest bearing balances. The

increase in average interest bearing deposits was reflected principally in a $73.5 million increase in average

savings account balances, as well as increases in average time deposits and NOW accounts totaling $42.0

million and $29.3 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a $6.4 million decrease in

average IMMA balances. The increase in average borrowings was due principally to an increase in

borrowings assumed by the Corporation in the Capital Bank acquisition. While average interest-bearing

liabilities increased $160.5 million, or 23.2%, interest expense decreased $209 thousand or 10.7%, as the

cost of average interest-bearing liabilities decreased 31 basis points to 0.81%.

As discussed under the Asset Quality section of this report, a $208 thousand increase in the provision for

loan losses was principally due to an increase in specific allocations on impaired loans, somewhat offset

by improved credit quality in the remainder of the loan portfolio, as well as a decrease in net charge-

offs, and reflects management's evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based upon a

number of factors, including an analysis of historical loss factors, the evaluation of collateral, recent

charge-off experience, overall credit quality, current economic conditions and loan growth.

Non-interest income during the third quarter of 2011 increased $81 thousand or 1.9% compared to the

third quarter of 2010. This increase was principally due to a $429 thousand increase in net gains on

securities transactions, as during the quarter the Corporation sold a US Treasury bond resulting in the

above gain. In addition to the above, check card interchange fee income increased $84 thousand. These

increases were offset in part primarily by a $437 thousand decrease in Wealth Management Group

(formerly referred to as Trust and Investment Center) fee income, due to the closing of a large estate

during the fourth quarter of 2010.

Third quarter 2011 operating expenses were $1.734 million or 19.5% higher than the comparable period

last year, due in part to the Capital Bank acquisition. The increase in operating expenses was due in

large part to increases in salaries and benefits totaling $504 thousand and $362 thousand, respectively.

Other significant increases included a $165 thousand increase in net occupancy costs, a $154 thousand

increase in data processing costs, a $108 thousand increase in amortization of intangible assets, and

increases in marketing and advertising and professional services totaling $84 thousand and $80

thousand, respectively. The increase in salaries resulted from an increase in staff related to the Capital

Bank acquisition as well as merit increases over the past year, while the increase in employee benefits

was due principally to health insurance costs and pension expense. Increases in net occupancy costs,

amortization of intangible assets and marketing and advertising were due in large part to the Capital

Bank acquisition, while increases in data processing reflects higher data communication line charges,

Wealth Management Group and check card processing costs. The above increases were offset in part

primarily by a $75 thousand decrease in OREO expenses.

A $560 thousand increase in income tax expense reflects a $1.300 million increase in pre-tax income,

and an increase in the effective tax rate from 30.5% to 33.8% due to a decrease in the relative percentage

of tax exempt income to pre-tax income, as well as a reduction in third quarter 2010 taxes due to a

statutory change in the New York State bad debt deduction.

Year-to-Date 2011 vs. Year-to-Date 2010

Net income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 totaled $7.576 million, an increase of

$522 thousand or 7.4% compared to the corresponding period in 2010. Earnings per share decreased

10.2% from $1.96 to $1.76 per share on 693,275 additional average shares outstanding. The increase in

net income was impacted positively by higher net interest income and non-interest income, as well as a

decrease in the provision for loan loss expense, offset by higher operating expenses, including $2.244

million of direct transaction costs associated with the Capital Bank acquisition. Excluding the direct

transaction costs noted above, net income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 would

have totaled approximately $9.031 million or $2.10 per share, with Capital Bank contributing an

estimated $2.314 million or $0.54 per share.

Net interest income compared to the first nine months of 2010 increased $5.868 million or 22.6% with

the net interest margin increasing 20 basis points to 4.02%. Once again, management attributes this

increase to the Capital Bank acquisition as a $148.3 million or 16.3% increase in average earning assets

and a 36 basis point decrease in the cost of average interest bearing liabilities was partially offset by an 8

basis point decrease in the yield on average earning assets. The $148.3 million increase in average

earning assets included a $134.5 million increase in average loans, with Capital Bank loans contributing

$107.9 million to this increase, an $8.6 million increase in average interest bearing deposits and a $5.2

million increase in the average investment portfolio due to $29.6 million in Capital bank average

investments. While on average, earning assets increased 16.3%, total interest and dividend income

increased $4.612 million or 14.2%, with the yield on average earning assets decreasing 8 basis points to

4.68%.

Total average funding liabilities, including non-interest bearing demand deposits, as compared to the first

nine months of last year, increased $135.7 million or 15.2% to $1.028 billion as average deposits and

borrowings increased $125.5 million and $10.2 million, respectively. In total, average non-interest bearing

deposits increased $42.0 million, with Capital Bank non-interest bearing deposits comprising $16.2

million of that increase. Average interest bearing deposits increased $83.5 million due to $104.3 million in Capital

Bank average interest bearing deposits, offset by decreases in other average interest bearing balances. The

increase in average interest bearing deposits was reflected principally in a $50.9 million increase in average

savings account balances, as well as increases in average NOW and time deposits totaling $20.2 million and

$18.8 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a $6.4 million decrease in average

IMMA balances. The increase in average borrowings was due to borrowings assumed by the Corporation

in the Capital Bank acquisition. While average interest-bearing liabilities increased $93.7 million or 13.4%,

interest expense decreased $1.256 million or 19.6%, as the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities

decreased 36 basis points to 0.87%.

As discussed under the Asset Quality section of this report, despite an increase in specific allocations for

impaired loans, the year-to-date provision for loan losses decreased $292 thousand due to overall credit

quality improvement in the remainder of the loan portfolio, as well as lower net charge-offs, and reflects

management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based upon a number of

factors, including an analysis of historical loss factors, the evaluation of collateral, recent charge-off

experience, overall credit quality, current economic conditions and loan growth.

Non-interest income for the first nine months of 2011 was $513 thousand or 4.0% higher than the

comparable period last year. This increase was due in part to a $657 thousand increase in gains on

securities transactions and a $441 thousand increase in revenue from the Corporation’s equity

investment in Cephas Capital Partners, L.P., a small business investment company limited partnership,

due in large part to a gain recognized on the exercise of stock warrants held in one of its investments.

Additionally impacting the improvement in non-interest income was a $326 thousand decrease in OTTI

charges on trust preferred securities pools held in the Corporation’s investment portfolio, as well as

increases in check card interchange fee income and revenue of CFS Group, Inc. totaling $245 thousand

and $114 thousand, respectively. These increases were partially offset primarily by a $1.126 million

decrease in Wealth Management Group fee income and a $248 thousand decrease in service charges.

The decrease in Wealth Management Group fee income was due to the previously mentioned closing of

a large estate during the fourth quarter of last year, while the decrease in service charges was primarily

due to lower net overdraft fee income.

Year-to-date operating expenses were $5.718 million or 20.8% higher than last year, due in large part to

the aforementioned direct acquisition transaction costs totaling $2.244 million. Excluding these costs,

all other operating expenses increased $3.475 million or 12.6%. Similar to third quarter results and for

reasons noted above, the major factors affecting this increase include a $1.171 million increase in

salaries, a $468 thousand increase in employee benefits, a $424 thousand increase in data processing

costs, a $391 thousand increase in net occupancy costs and increases in professional services and

amortization of intangible assets totaling $303 thousand and $203 thousand, respectively. Other factors

include a $139 thousand increase in marketing and advertising expenses related to the Capital Bank

acquisition, as well as increases in stationery and supplies and furniture and equipment expenses totaling

$127 thousand and $108 thousand, respectively. The above increases were offset in part by a $175

thousand decrease in FDIC insurance assessments and a $219 thousand decrease in OREO expenses.

A $432 thousand increase in income tax expense was principally due to the $954 thousand increase in

pre-tax income, as well as an increase in the effective tax rate from 30.9% to 32.1% due to a decrease in

the relative percentage of tax exempt income to pre-tax income.

Average Consolidated Balance Sheet and Interest Analysis (dollars in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011								Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010								Three Months Ended September 30, 2011								Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Assets	Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate
Earning assets:
Loans	$	722,583		$	31,456		5.82	%	$	588,109		$	26,412		6.00	%	$	785,193		$	11,673		5.90	%	$	588,179		$	8,742		5.90	%
Taxable securities		208,891			4,348		2.78	%		213,323			4,969		3.11	%		223,282			1,504		2.67	%		215,323			1,555		2.87	%
Tax-exempt securities		51,813			1,035		2.67	%		42,153			889		2.82	%		53,014			351		2.62	%		42,357			301		2.82	%
Federal funds sold		-			-		N/A			-			-		N/A			-			-		N/A			-			-		N/A	%
Interest-bearing deposits		75,012			167		.30	%		66,415			124		0.25	%		81,313			65		0.32	%		66,121			42		0.25	%
Total earning assets		1,058,299			37,006		4.68	%		910,000			32,394		4.76	%		1,142,802			13,593		4.72	%		911,980			10,640		4.63	%

Non-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		22,380								21,834								23,783								20,899
Premises and equipment, net		24,270								24,427								24,327								24,150
Other assets		45,863								37,609								51,867								36,700
Allowance for loan losses		(9,731	)							(10,281	)							(9,894	)							(10,419	)
AFS valuation allowance		11,690								9,769								13,727								11,384
Total	$	1,152,771							$	993,358							$	1,246,612							$	994,694

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits		71,906			63		0.12	%		51,718			37		0.10	%		80,665			25		0.13	%		51,382			11		0.09	%
Savings and insured money market deposits		345,040			663		0.26	%		300,554			769		0.34	%		371,306			248		0.26	%		304,231			216		0.28	%
Time deposits		295,080			2,600		1.18	%		276,265			3,647		1.76	%		314,348			865		1.09	%		272,393			1,109		1.62	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		79,984			1,839		3.07	%		69,779			1,969		3.77	%		86,520			612		2.80	%		64,286			623		3.84	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		792,010			5,165		0.87	%		698,316			6,422		1.23	%		852,839			1,750		0.81	%		692,292			1,959		1.12	%

Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		235,656								193,691								255,957								198,167
Other liabilities		8,096								7,474								9,511								7,931
Total liabilities		1,035,762								899,481								1,118,307								898,390
Shareholders' equity		117,009								93,877								128,305								96,304
Total	$	1,152,771							$	993,358							$	1,246,612							$	994,694
Net interest income				$	31,841							$	25,972							$	11,843							$	8,681
Net interest rate spread							3.81	%							3.53	%							3.91	%							3.51	%

Net interest margin							4.02	%							3.82	%							4.11	%							3.78	%

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, a summary of the changes in interest and

dividends earned and interest paid resulting from changes in volume and changes in rates (dollars

in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010									Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Increase (Decrease) Due to (1)									Increase (Decrease) Due to (1)
	Volume			Rate			Net			Volume		Rate			Net
Interest and dividends earned on:
Loans	$	5,876		$	(832	)	$	5,044		$	2,929	$	2		$	2,931
Taxable securities		(102	)		(519	)		(621	)		56		(107	)		(51	)
Tax-exempt securities		195			(49	)		146			72		(22	)		50
Interest-bearing deposits		17			26			43			11		12			23

Total earning assets	$	5,195		$	(583	)	$	4,612		$	2,741		212			2,953

Interest paid on:
Demand deposits	$	17		$	9		$	26		$	8	$	6		$	14
Savings and insured money market deposits		103			(209	)		(106	)		45		(13	)		32
Time deposits		234			(1,281	)		(1,047	)		153		(397	)		(244	)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		264		$	(394	)	$	(130	)		183		(194	)		(11	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	783		$	(2,040	)	$	(1,257	)	$	397	$	(606	)	$	(209	)

Net interest income	$	4,412		$	1,457		$	5,869		$	2,344	$	818		$	3,162
(1) The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity management involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of deposit customers,

borrowers, and the operating, investing, and financing activities of the Corporation. The Corporation

uses a variety of resources to meet its liquidity needs. These include short term investments, cash flow

from lending and investing activities, core deposit growth and non-core funding sources, such as time

deposits of $100,000 or more, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings.

The Corporation is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York which allows it to access

borrowings which enhance management's ability to satisfy future liquidity needs. Based on available

collateral and current advances outstanding, the Corporation was eligible to borrow up to a total of $68.2

million and $63.0 million at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively.

During the first nine months of 2011, cash and cash equivalents increased $57.9 million as compared to

a decrease of $6.6 million during the first nine months of last year. In addition to cash provided by

operating activities, major sources of cash during the first nine months of 2011 included proceeds from

sales, maturities, calls and principal reductions on securities totaling $94.8 million, a $55.4 million

increase in deposits and $25.1 million in net cash received in the FOFC acquisition. These proceeds

were used primarily to fund purchases of securities totaling $99.2 million, a net decrease in securities

sold under agreements to repurchase totaling $13.9 million, a $11.0 million net increase in loans, the

payment of cash dividends in the amount of $2.9 million and purchases of fixed assets totaling $1.3

million, as well as a $765 thousand increase in Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank

stock and purchases of treasury shares totaling $327 thousand.

In addition to cash provided by operating activities, major sources of cash during the first nine months of

2010 included proceeds from sales, maturities, calls and principal reductions on securities totaling

$109.3 million, a $3.2 million decrease in loans and a $2.4 million increase in deposits. Proceeds from

the above were used primarily to fund purchases of securities totaling $116.2 million, a $10.5 million

decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the payment of cash dividends in the amount

of $2.6 million and purchases of fixed assets and treasury shares totaling $1.2 million and $426

thousand, respectively.

As of September 30, 2011, the Bank’s leverage ratio was 7.71%. The Tier I and Total Risk Adjusted

Capital ratios were 11.30% and 12.74%, respectively. All of the above ratios are in excess of the

requirements for being considered "well capitalized" by the FDIC, the Federal Reserve and the New

York State Banking Department.

During the first nine months of 2011 the Corporation declared cash dividends totaling $0.75 per share,

unchanged from the dividends declared during the first nine months of 2010.

When shares of the Corporation become available in the market, we may purchase them after careful

consideration of our capital position. On November 17, 2010, the Corporation’s Board of Directors

approved a one year extension of the stock repurchase program that had been initially approved on

November 18, 2009. The extension authorizes the purchase of up to 90,000 shares of the Corporation’s

outstanding common stock, including those shares purchased during the first year of the plan. Purchases

may be made from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at the discretion

of management. During the first nine months of 2011, the Corporation purchased 13,981 treasury shares at

an average price of $23.42 per share. Through September 30, 2011, a total of 34,712 shares had been

purchased under this program. During the first nine months of 2011, 21,343 shares were re-issued from

treasury to fund the stock component of directors’ 2010 compensation, distributions under the

Corporation’s directors’ deferred stock plan, a stock grant to an executive officer, restricted stock awards to

executive officers and funding for the Corporation’s profit sharing, savings and investment plan.

Interest Rate Risk

As intermediaries between borrowers and savers, commercial banks incur both interest rate risk and

liquidity risk. The Corporation's Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) has the strategic responsibility for

setting the policy guidelines on acceptable exposure to these areas. These guidelines contain specific

measures and limits regarding these risks, which are monitored on a regular basis. The ALCO is made

up of the president & chief executive officer, all executive vice presidents, the chief financial officer, the

asset liability management officer, the senior marketing officer, and others representing key functions.

The ALCO is also responsible for supervising the preparation and annual revisions of the financial

segments of the annual budget, which is built upon the committee's economic and interest-rate

assumptions. It is the responsibility of the ALCO to modify prudently the Corporation's asset/liability

policies.

Interest rate risk is the risk that net interest income will fluctuate as a result of a change in interest rates.

It is the assumption of interest rate risk, along with credit risk, that drives the net interest margin of a

financial institution. For that reason, the ALCO has established tolerance limits based upon a 200-basis

point change in interest rates. At September 30, 2011, it is estimated that an immediate 200-basis point

decrease in interest rates would negatively impact the next 12 months net interest income by 10.80% and

an immediate 200-basis point increase would negatively impact the next 12 months net interest income

by 0.44%. Both are within the Corporation's policy guideline of 15% established by ALCO. Given the

overall low level of current interest rates and the unlikely event of a 200-basis point decline from this

point, management additionally modeled an immediate 100-basis point decline and an immediate 300-

b asis point increase in interest rates. When applied, it is estimated these scenarios would result in

negative impacts to net interest income of 5.34% and 0.72%, respectively. Management is comfortable

with the level of exposures at these levels.

A related component of interest rate risk is the expectation that the market value of our capital account

will fluctuate with changes in interest rates. This component is a direct corollary to the earnings-impact

component: an institution exposed to earnings erosion is also exposed to shrinkage in market value. At

September 30, 2011, it is estimated that an immediate 200-basis point decrease in interest rates would

negatively impact the market value of our capital account by 12.14% and an immediate 200-basis point

increase in interest rates would positively impact the market value by 2.16%. Both are within the

established tolerance limit of 15%. Management also modeled the impact to the market value of our

capital with an immediate 100-basis point decline and an immediate 300-basis point increase in

interest rates, based on the current interest rate environment. When applied, it is estimated these scenarios

would result in impacts to the market value of our capital of negative 7.58% and positive 0.91%,

respectively. Management is also comfortable with the level of exposures at these levels.

Management does recognize the need for certain hedging strategies during periods of anticipated higher

fluctuations in interest rates and the Board-approved Funds Management Policy provides for limited use

of certain derivatives in asset liability management. These strategies were not employed during the first

nine months of 2011.

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Information required by this Item is set forth herein in Management's Discussion and Analysis of

Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading "Interest Rate Risk."

Item 4: C ontrols and Procedures

The Corporation's management, with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer,

who is the Corporation's principal executive officer, and our Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, who

is the Corporation's principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation's

disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2011 pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and

principal financial officer have concluded that the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures are

effective as of September 30, 2011.

During the third quarter of 2011, a deficiency in the design and operation of internal controls at the

branch level was identified that permitted an alleged misappropriation of funds to go undetected. This

deficiency did not have a material affect on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of

operations. Management has taken appropriate steps to remediate the design and operation of these

controls.

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
	Information related to this item is disclosed in Part 1 Item 1 (Note 7 to the interim consolidated financial statements).

Item 1A.	Risk Factors
	There have been no material changes in the risk factors set forth in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2011.

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c)	Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (1)
	Period	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share	Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
	7/1/11-7/30/11	-	$ -	-	61,425
	8/1/11-8/31/11	387	$ 23.4070	387	61,038
	9/1/11-9/30/11	5,750	$ 23.4457	5,750	55,288
	Quarter ended 9/30/11	6,137	$ 23.4432	6,137	55,288

	(1) On November 17, 2010, the Corporation’s Board of Directors approved a one year extension of the stock repurchase program that had been initially approved on November 18, 2009. The extension authorizes the purchase of up to 90,000 shares of the Corporation's outstanding common stock, including those shares purchased during the first year of the plan Purchases will be made from time to time on the open-market or in privately negotiated transactions, and will be at the discretion of management.
Item 6.	EXHIBITS
	The following exhibits are either filed with this Form 10-Q or are incorporated herein by reference:
	3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Chemung Financial Corporation dated December 20, 1984. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.

	3.2 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Chemung Financial Corporation, dated March 28, 1988. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.

	3.3 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Chemung Financial Corporation, dated May 13, 1998. Filed as Exhibit 3.4 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

	3.4 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended to December 15, 2010. Filed as Exhibit 3.4 to Registrant's Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

	10.15 Settlement Agreement and Waiver and Release dated July 5, 2011 between Chemung Financial Corporation, Chemung Canal Trust Company and Peter D. Cureau. Filed herewith and incorporated herein by reference.

	31.1 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

	31.2 Certification of Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

	32.1 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

	32.2 Certification of Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this

report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION

DATE:	November 14, 2011	/s/ Ronald M. Bentley
		Ronald M. Bentley
		President & Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)


DATE:	November 14, 2011	/s/ John R. Battersby Jr.
		John R. Battersby Jr.
		Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Chemung Financial Corporation dated December 20, 1984. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Chemung Financial Corporation, dated March 28, 1988. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.3 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Chemung Financial Corporation, dated May 13, 1998. Filed as Exhibit 3.4 of the Registrant's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.4 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended to December 15, 2010. Filed as Exhibit 3.4 to Registrant's Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.15 Settlement Agreement and Waiver and Release dated July 5, 2011 between Chemung Financial Corporation, Chemung Canal Trust Company and Peter D. Cureau. Filed herewith and incorporated herein by reference.

31.1 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2 Certification of Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

32.2 Certification of Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. Financial Information Item 1: Financial Statements Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations Part To The Corporation S Acquisition Of Fort Orange Financial Corp. ( Fofc ) and The Concurrent Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 4: C Ontrols and Procedures Part II. Other Information Part II Item 1. Legal Proceedings Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds Item 6. Exhibits

CHMG 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011