CIENA CORP
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
|
October 31, 2018
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file number
001-36250
Ciena Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
|
23-2725311
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
7035 Ridge Road, Hanover, MD
|
|
21076
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(410) 694-5700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES
þ
NO
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES
o
NO
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES
þ
NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). YES
þ
NO
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§232.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
||
|
Emerging growth company
o
|
||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES
o
NO
þ
The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $3.7 billion based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on April 27, 2018.
The number of shares of Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of December 17, 2018 was
156,481,822
.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of the Form 10-K incorporates by reference certain portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its
2019
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
CIENA CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report contains statements that discuss future events or expectations, projections of results of operations or financial condition, changes in the markets for our products and services, trends in our business, business prospects and strategies and other “forward-looking” information. In some cases, you can identify “forward-looking statements” by words like “may,” “will,” “can,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “future,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “intends,” “potential,” “projects,” “targets,” or “continue” or the negative of those words and other comparable words. These statements may relate to, among other things, our competitive landscape; market conditions and growth opportunities; factors impacting our industry and markets; factors impacting the businesses of network operators and their network architectures; adoption of next-generation network technology and software programmability and automation of networks; our strategy, including our research and development, supply chain and go-to-market initiatives; efforts to increase application of our solutions in customer networks and to increase the reach of our business into new or growing customer and geographic markets; our backlog and seasonality in our business; expectations for our financial results, revenue, gross margin, operating expense and key operating measures in future periods; the adequacy of our sources of liquidity to satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures and other liquidity requirements; business initiatives including information technology (IT) transitions or initiatives; the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and changes in our effective tax rates; and market risks associated with financial instruments and foreign currency exchange rates. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and actual events or results may differ materially due to factors such as:
|
•
|
our ability to execute our business and growth strategies;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in our revenue, gross margin and operating results and our financial results generally;
|
|
•
|
the loss of any of our large customers, a significant reduction in their spending, or a material change in their networking or procurement strategies;
|
|
•
|
the competitive environment in which we operate;
|
|
•
|
market acceptance of products and services currently under development and delays in product or software development;
|
|
•
|
lengthy sales cycles and onerous contract terms with communications service providers, Web-scale providers and other large customers;
|
|
•
|
product performance or security problems and undetected errors;
|
|
•
|
our ability to diversify our customer base beyond our traditional customers and to broaden the application for our solutions in communications networks;
|
|
•
|
the level of growth in network traffic and bandwidth consumption and the corresponding level of investment in network infrastructures by network operators;
|
|
•
|
the international scale of our operations;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
•
|
our ability to forecast accurately demand for our products for purposes of inventory purchase practices;
|
|
•
|
the impact of pricing pressure and price erosion that we regularly encounter in our markets;
|
|
•
|
our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights, and costs we may incur in response to intellectual property right infringement claims made against us;
|
|
•
|
the continued availability, on commercially reasonable terms, of software and other technology under third-party licenses;
|
|
•
|
the potential failure to maintain the security of confidential, proprietary or otherwise sensitive business information or systems or to protect against cyber attacks;
|
|
•
|
the performance of our third-party contract manufacturers;
|
|
•
|
changes or disruption in components or supplies provided by third parties, including sole and limited source suppliers;
|
|
•
|
our ability to manage effectively our relationships with third-party service partners and distributors;
|
|
•
|
unanticipated risks and additional obligations in connection with our resale of complementary products or technology of other companies;
|
|
•
|
our ability to grow and maintain our new distribution relationships under which we will make available certain technology as a component;
|
|
•
|
our exposure to the credit risks of our customers and our ability to collect receivables;
|
|
•
|
modification or disruption of our internal business processes and information systems;
|
|
•
|
the effect of our outstanding indebtedness on our liquidity and business;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in our stock price and our ability to access the capital markets to raise capital;
|
|
•
|
unanticipated expenses or disruptions to our operations caused by facilities transitions or restructuring activities;
|
|
•
|
our ability to attract and retain experienced and qualified personnel;
|
3
|
•
|
disruptions to our operations caused by strategic acquisitions and investments or the inability to achieve the expected benefits and synergies of newly-acquired businesses;
|
|
•
|
our ability to commercialize and grow our software business and address networking strategies including software-defined networking and network function virtualization;
|
|
•
|
changes in, and the impact of, government regulations, including with respect to: the communications industry generally; the business of our customers; the use, import or export of products; and the environment, potential climate change and other social initiatives;
|
|
•
|
the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, changes in tax regulations and related accounting, and changes in our effective tax rates;
|
|
•
|
future legislation or executive action in the U.S. relating to tax policy or trade regulation;
|
|
•
|
the write-down of goodwill, long-lived assets, or our deferred tax assets;
|
|
•
|
our ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting and liabilities that result from the inability to comply with corporate governance requirements; and
|
|
•
|
adverse results in litigation matters.
|
These are only some of the factors that may affect the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report. For a discussion identifying additional important factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors” in this annual report. You should review these risk factors for a more complete understanding of the risks associated with an investment in our securities. However, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment and new risks and uncertainties emerge, are identified or become apparent from time to time. We cannot predict all risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report. You should be aware that the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report are based on our current views and assumptions. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements made in this annual report to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law. The forward-looking statements in this annual report are intended to be subject to protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Overview
We are a networking systems, services and software company, providing solutions that enable a wide range of network operators to deploy and manage next-generation networks that deliver services to businesses and consumers. We provide network hardware, software and services that support the transport, switching, aggregation, service delivery and management of video, data and voice traffic on communications networks. Our solutions are used by communications service providers, cable and multiservice operators, Web-scale providers, submarine network operators, governments, enterprises, research and education (R&E) institutions and other emerging network operators.
Our solutions include a diverse portfolio of high-capacity Networking Platform products, which can be applied from the network core to network access points, and which allow network operators to scale capacity, increase transmission speeds, allocate traffic and adapt dynamically to changing end-user service demands. We also offer Platform Software that provides management and domain control of our next-generation packet and optical platforms and automates network lifecycle operations, including provisioning equipment and services. In addition, through our comprehensive suite of Blue Planet Automation Software, we enable network operators to use network data and analytics to drive enhanced automation across multi-vendor and multi-domain network environments, accelerate service delivery and enable an increasingly predictive and autonomous network infrastructure. To complement our hardware and software solutions, we offer a broad range of attached and software-related services that help our customers design, optimize, integrate, deploy, manage and maintain their networks and associated operational environments. Through our complete portfolio of solutions, we enable our customers to transform their network into a dynamic, programmable environment driven by automation and analytics, which we refer to as the Adaptive Network. Our solutions for the Adaptive Network create business and operational value for our customers, enabling them to introduce new revenue-generating services, reduce costs and maximize the return on their network infrastructure investment.
Corporate Information and Access to SEC Reports
We were incorporated in Delaware in November 1992 and completed our initial public offering on February 7, 1997. Our principal executive offices are located at 7035 Ridge Road, Hanover, Maryland 21076. Our telephone number is (410)
4
694-5700, and our website address is www.ciena.com. We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, available free of charge in the “Investors” section of our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We routinely post these reports, recent news and announcements, financial results and other important information about our business on our website at www.ciena.com. Information contained on our website is not a part of this annual report.
Industry Background
Network Traffic Growth and Increased Capacity Requirements
The markets in which we sell our communications networking solutions have seen significant changes in recent years. In particular, optical networks – which carry video, data and voice traffic by encoding digital information on multiple wavelengths of light traveling across fiber optic cables – have experienced strong traffic growth for several years. This growth, and the resulting requirements for increased network capacity and transmission speed, is being driven by an increasingly diverse set of communications services and applications. These services and applications, including those set forth below, are increasing the bandwidth and service demands placed upon networks and are challenging the business models of many network operators.
|
•
|
Cloud-Based Services.
Enterprises and consumers continue to replace locally-housed computing and storage by adopting a broad array of innovative cloud-based models – including Platform as a Service (PaaS), Software as a Service (SaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) – and an expanding range of cloud-based services that host key applications, store data, enable the viewing and downloading of content and utilize on-demand computing resources.
|
|
•
|
Over-the-Top (OTT) Services and Video Streaming
. OTT content refers to video, multimedia and other applications provided directly from the content source to the viewer or end user across a third-party network. Traffic from streaming and OTT services, including high definition and ultra-high definition video, has expanded with the increased availability of, and end-user demand for, video content accessible through a variety of devices and media.
|
|
•
|
On-Demand Services
. Users of communications services require an on-demand service level that allows them to be connected wherever and whenever they desire. Businesses rely upon enterprise services and data center connectivity that facilitate global operations, employee mobility and access to critical business applications and data. Consumers expect broadband services, including peer-to-peer internet applications, augmented reality applications and multimedia streaming and downloads, to be available on-demand.
|
|
•
|
Mobile Devices and Applications.
Traffic from mobile applications, including video, internet and data services, has expanded with the proliferation of smartphones, tablets and other wireless devices. Because so much of wireless traffic ultimately travels across a wireline network to reach its destination, growth in mobile communications continues to place demands upon wireline networks, including backhaul and fronthaul networks emanating from cell sites.
|
In addition, emerging services and applications present further challenges and are likely to place significant service, capacity and automation demands upon network infrastructures. These include:
|
•
|
Network Densification.
Increasing demand by businesses and consumers for data, content and related services are impacting network infrastructures, particularly at the edge of networks, where increased computing power and automation are required to meet the quality of experience required by these users. To cost-effectively address these demands, network operators will be required to adopt emerging wireless and wireline network architectures. Fifth-Generation wireless broadband technology (5G) is designed to enable significant increases in data consumption by a growing number of users and devices, thereby better supporting the “Internet of Things” and other emerging applications. “Fiber deep” initiatives by cable and multiservice operators are designed to push digital fiber-based communications closer to the end-user, increasing potential bandwidth to homes and enterprises and increasing data speeds while addressing power, space and operating costs. Implementation of these network densification initiatives is expected to have a significant effect on wireline networks.
|
|
•
|
Internet of Things
. As the number of networked connections between devices and servers grows, machine-to-machine-related traffic (M2M) is expected to represent an increasing portion of traffic as the Internet of Things evolves. These connections can provide value-added services and allow sharing of data that can be monitored and analyzed. We expect network traffic relating to the interconnection of devices to grow along with the widening adoption of internet and cloud-based content delivery, smart grid applications, health care and safety monitoring, resource and inventory management, home entertainment, consumer appliances, connected transportation and other M2M data applications.
|
5
|
•
|
Ultra-High Definition TV and Virtual and Augmented Reality.
Ultra-high definition TV and the advent of immersive technologies like 360° video, virtual reality and augmented reality are likely to place meaningful capacity and capability demands on networks as adoption of these technologies grows. The television, internet and consumer electronics industries are rapidly advancing these technologies and making them more widely available and affordable to consumers.
|
We believe that increased adoption of these services and applications will further increase traffic and capacity requirements and place additional service challenges on network infrastructures.
Network Transition to Programmable Networks with Enhanced Automation
To reduce costs and promote network efficiency and simplicity, network operators, particularly communications service providers, are increasingly looking to adopt next-generation infrastructures that are more open, programmable and automated. Networks today are still primarily physical in nature and are generally managed via inventory management, planning and fulfillment systems. Moving toward digital network transformation, operators are increasingly leveraging information technology (IT) strategies that emphasize software capabilities and automation through policy controlled and analytics-driven network solutions that are more predictive and can adapt more quickly to changing end-user demands. To bridge the existing gap between the operational realities of today and the hybrid networks and operations of the future – emphasizing virtual elements, automation and analytics – we expect expect network operators to adopt strategies that may include one or more of the following:
|
•
|
Orchestration.
Software-based orchestration simplifies the end-to-end creation, automation and deployment of services across multiple physical and virtual network domains. We believe software-based orchestration presents an opportunity to reduce network and operational complexity and offers an alternative to certain elements of traditional operations support and business support systems, which network operators have historically relied upon to support network management functions such as inventory, service provisioning, network configuration and fault management.
|
|
•
|
Network Function Virtualization (NFV)
. Through NFV, network operators can separate network services or capabilities from the physical network assets that traditionally provide these services or capabilities to end users. To reduce their dependence upon single-purpose hardware platforms and accelerate the time to market for new revenue-generating services, network operators are increasingly looking for solutions that enable network functions through software that runs on industry-standard servers, network and storage platforms.
|
|
•
|
Software-Defined Networking (SDN).
SDN seeks to simplify networks to create more open environments that ease management, support automation and quickly deliver customized services to end users, by enabling individual network elements to be directly programmable by standards-based software control. This results in end-to-end visibility of network flows, enabling the optimization of traffic paths and the control of data flows through a network.
|
We believe that adoption of these strategies will require network operators and their network solutions vendors to increasingly look to utilize an ecosystem of physical and virtual network resources. We expect that these network architectural approaches, in turn, will drive increased openness and interoperability of multi-vendor, multi-domain network environments, requiring an increased degree of cooperation, collaboration and interoperability among solutions providers.
Different Approaches to Design and Procure Network Infrastructure Solutions
Leading network operators are pursuing a diverse range of approaches, or “consumption models,” to manage the design and procurement of their network infrastructures. These consumption models include: the traditional systems procurement of fully integrated solutions including hardware, software and services from the same vendor; the procurement of a fully integrated hardware solution from one vendor with the separate use of a network operator’s own or another vendor’s SDN-based control; the procurement of an integrated photonic line system with open interfaces from one vendor and the separate or “disaggregated” procurement of modem technology from a different vendor; or the use of published reference designs and open source specifications for the procurement of off-the-shelf or commoditized hardware (often referred to as “white box” hardware) to be used with open source software. Further, a number of network operators, and certain of our suppliers, are pursuing the development and future deployment of smaller form factor, pluggable modem technology as an alternative to integrated platforms. In parallel, network operators are also exploring a range of alternatives to meet their software requirements, from licensing integrated and proprietary third party software solutions to fully utilizing open source software.
6
Many of these consumption models being pursued continue to be in their early stages of evaluation, and the models that ultimately emerge and their level of adoption will depend in significant part on the circumstances and strategies of certain network operators. We also believe that broader adoption of procurement models involving greater disaggregation remains uncertain, particularly for those network operators for whom such an approach would result in increased operational complexity, expense, and integration and support obligations. Based on our views of the market and customer interactions, we expect that the largest portion of deployed capacity, for at least the next few years, will continue to be through the purchase of fully integrated hardware solutions. We expect that customer consideration of a variety of consumption models will require network operators and vendors alike to assess, and possibly broaden, their offerings and commercial models over time, thereby placing premium on a vendor’s ability to provide robust network solutions with the maximum amount of flexibility and choice.
Industry Consolidation
Our industry has experienced significant consolidation in recent years among our competitors, customers and suppliers alike. To drive scale and market share gains and meet the intense investment capacity required to keep pace with technology innovation, acquisition activity among vendors of networking solutions has increased. Among our customers, there have been significant horizontal and vertical consolidation activities by service providers and cable operators, with several such operators acquiring media and content companies. Customer consolidation can increase purchasing power and has in the past resulted in delays or reductions in network spending due to changes in strategy or leadership, the timing of regulatory approvals and debt burdens associated with such transactions. Finally, significant consolidation among component suppliers may reduce the number of independent suppliers and could disrupt our supply chain and adversely impact pricing. Consolidation activity across our industry can create opportunities and challenges for our business. We expect this trend to continue and it may have a significant impact on the entire industry, including the competitive landscape, the range sales opportunities for vendors and their supply chains.
Strategy
Our strategy is to leverage our technology leadership, diversify and expand our addressable markets, and drive the profitable growth of our business. Key initiatives of this strategy include:
Extend Innovation Leadership and Enable Customers to Realize an Adaptive Network.
We are focused on pushing the pace of innovation in our markets and providing market-leading offerings that promote what we refer to as the Adaptive Network. Our Adaptive Network vision emphasizes programmable network infrastructure that leverages our WaveLogic coherent modem technology, enhanced IP capabilities in access and aggregation networks, and software control and automation capabilities. We are focused on providing market-leading programmable infrastructure innovation capable of providing advanced network telemetry and allowing for tuning of network capacity and speeds to meet changing needs. We are also introducing solutions with enhanced IP capabilities to help network operators make better operating decisions and to optimize their network performance and deliver a better user experience. We continue to invest in our automation solutions and believe that through automation, analytics and intent-based policies, we can enable an Adaptive Network that can rapidly scale, self-configure and self-optimize by assessing network pressures and demands.
Leverage Blue Planet for Intelligent, Closed-Loop Automated Networks
. We seek to promote adoption of our Blue Planet Automation Software, highlighting its ability to transform network operations and management as well as IT and back office processes. Blue Planet is designed to automate, orchestrate and manage both physical and virtual network resources and their associated services across data centers and the wide area network (WAN). We believe that Blue Planet can transform legacy networks into “service ready” networks, accelerating the creation, delivery and lifecycle management of new, cloud-based services. We seek to enable closed-loop automation for networks by leveraging automation and orchestration, multi-domain inventory, topology and federation, analytics, machine learning and assurance. Through our acquisitions of Packet Design, LLC and DonRiver Holdings, LLC in fiscal 2018, we augmented our software offerings to include route optimization and assurance functionality and multi-domain inventory topology and visualization. We are also investing in professional services delivery to enable the sale of broader solutions that combine software and services. This solutions-based selling approach seeks to use insights into our customers’ common operational and networking issues and positions Blue Planet software and services to enable the digital network transformation that our customers are seeking.
Promote Flexibility and Choice.
Choice is an increasingly important element of our customers’ networking approach and their efforts to manage network demands and costs. Our philosophy is rooted in enabling choice in the market by developing network solutions that address a range of different customer consumption models. Our desire to promote choice influences our development priorities as well as our go-to-market approach. We intend to offer a range of choice to customers across packet-optical convergence, coherent modem leadership and multi-vendor, multi-domain network automation software. We are pursuing “merchant modem” sales opportunities that leverage our Wavelogic modem leadership, directly and indirectly.
7
Merchant modems, often called transponders, are the combination of an optical chipset or ASIC with other key optical components that are sold independently of integrated systems. Merchant modem vendors often sell their modem technology in the form of an optical module or pluggable to a variety of market participants, including other original equipment manufacturers. While broader adoption of procurement models that emphasize disaggregation of hardware and software remains uncertain, we expect that a range of different consumption models will require us to broaden our existing offering and commercial models over time. We intend to offer solutions and pursue sales opportunities across a range of customer consumption models to drive the evolution of next-generation network infrastructures and to promote choice in our markets.
Focus Diversification on High-Growth Applications and Customer Segments.
We believe that continued diversification of our business is important to address the dynamic industry environment in which we operate, to continue to grow our business, and to better withstand potential slowdowns adversely affecting particular geographies, markets or customer segments. Our strategy is to diversify our solutions offerings and customer base to address fast-growing applications and customer segments. We seek to increase adoption of our packet access and aggregation solutions and to secure and grow market share with our Blue Planet Automation Software platform. We are also pursuing opportunities with a diverse set of network operators in growth segments and geographies. Our go-to-market strategy seeks to capture additional market share with current customers and other Web-scale providers and emerging network operators, and to displace competitors in international markets, particularly in Asia-Pacific and India. We intend to use our direct and indirect sales channels to expand our sales with several other market verticals, including cable and multiservice operators, submarine network operators, enterprise customers and government and research and education (R&E) customers.
Customers and Markets
We sell our product and service solutions through direct and indirect sales channels to network operators in the following customer and market segments:
|
•
|
Communications Service Providers.
Our communications service provider customers, including regional, national and international wireline and wireless carriers, form our historical customer base and represent a majority of our revenue.
|
|
•
|
Web-scale Providers.
Our “Web-scale” provider customers include a diverse range of internet content providers and data center operators focused on applications such as search, social media, video, real-time communications and cloud-based service offerings as well as and other emerging network operators. As significant purchasers of capacity on submarine networks and from communications service providers on a global basis, these customers influence networking solution alternatives by those network operators.
|
|
•
|
Cable and Multiservice Operators (MSO).
Our customers include regional, national and international cable and multiservice operators.
|
|
•
|
Submarine Network Operators.
Our customers include service providers, Web-scale providers and consortia operators of submarine communications networks across the globe.
|
|
•
|
Enterprises.
Our enterprise customers include large, multi-site commercial organizations, including participants in the financial, health care, transportation, utilities, energy and retail industries.
|
|
•
|
Government, Research and Education (R&E).
Our government customers include federal and state agencies in the United States as well as international government entities. Our R&E customers include research and education institutions around the world, as well as communities or consortia including leaders in research, academia, industry and government.
|
A significant portion of our revenue is concentrated among a small number of customers. See the risk factor captioned “A small number of customers accounts for a significant portion of our revenue. The loss of any of these customers or a significant reduction in their spending could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.” in Item 1A of this annual report.
Products and Services
We offer the market a comprehensive set of networking solutions that include hardware platforms and systems, our leading optical coherent modem technology and network software solutions. We also offer a broad set of service offerings that allow us to gain valuable insight into network and business challenges faced by our customers and to work closely with them in the assessment, planning, deployment and transformation of their networks.
8
Networking Platforms
Our Networking Platforms segment consists of our Converged Packet Optical and Packet Networking product portfolios.
Converged Packet Optical.
Our Converged Packet Optical portfolio includes a range of hardware networking solutions that use our WaveLogic coherent optical technology and are optimized for the convergence of coherent optical transport, Optical Transport Network (OTN) switching and packet switching.
Our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform provides a flexible and scalable dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) solution that adds capacity to core, regional, metro and submarine networks and enables efficient transport at high transmission speeds. This platform provides leading coherent wavelength capacities, from 40G to 400G, along with multi-layer control plane capabilities for scale and service differentiation. This platform, which includes several chassis sizes and a comprehensive set of line cards optimized for individual services or applications, can be used throughout the network, from customer premises to metropolitan networks, the regional core and submarine cable landing sites.
Our Waveserver family of products consists of stackable interconnect platforms that allow network operators to scale bandwidth and support high bandwidth interconnect applications, such as high-speed data transfer, content delivery, virtual machine migration and disaster recovery/backup between data centers. Waveserver is a specialized platform that is purpose-built for addressing data center and other space-constrained environments using a small footprint and low power design. With its full suite of management interfaces and open APIs, Waveserver is easy to operate and integrate into existing networks and facilitates deployment of on-demand cloud and high-capacity connectivity services.
Our 5400 family of Packet-Optical Platforms consist of multi-terabit reconfigurable switching systems that consolidate the functionality of an add/drop multiplexer and digital cross-connect into a single, high-capacity intelligent switching system. These products address both core and metro segments of communications networks and support key managed services, including Ethernet/TDM Private Line and IP services. Our Z-Series multi-layer switching and transport platforms are used in regional and metro networks and are designed to support a variety of use cases including Ethernet business services and Ethernet backhaul. These products provide for optical transport, traffic aggregation at the network edge and switching that is optimized for handoff at the network core.
Leveraging our WaveLogic coherent modem technology, we are taking steps to pursue merchant modem sales opportunities through our Optical Microsystems products. To date, we have not generated meaningful revenue through these activities; however, such sales will be reflected within the Converged Packet Optical product line of our Networking Platforms segment.
Packet Networking.
Our Packet Networking products allow customers to simplify their network designs while delivering new, revenue-generating services. These products target applications primarily from the access to metro networks, where they aggregate and switch packet-based traffic to support such applications as Ethernet business services, mobile backhaul services, fiber deep, as well as ongoing network infrastructure scaling. Our Packet Networking products facilitate network cost effectiveness, including reduced costs associated with power and space, as compared to more complex, traditional IP routing network designs.
To date, revenue from our Packet Networking segment has been primarily related to our 3900 family of Service Delivery Switches and our 5000 family of Service Aggregation Switches and Platforms. These products support the access and aggregation tiers of telecommunications networks and have principally been deployed to support business services and wireless backhaul applications. Our 3900 family of Service Delivery Switches are purpose-built to fit small, medium and large customer sites as well as multi-tenant office and residential buildings. Our 5100 family of Service Aggregation Switches and Platforms provide aggregation to fill higher capacity links within both the metro access and aggregation tiers of networks, minimizing the number of router assets required in the core. The recent introduction of our 3900 family of Service Virtualization Platforms allows for customers to migrate towards software-based networking and services based on Network Function Virtualization.
Our Packet Networking portfolio also includes our 8700 Packetwave Platform, a multi-terabit packet switching platform for high-density metro networks and inter-data center wide area networks. The 8700 combines packet switching and coherent WaveLogic DWDM optical transport technologies for both data center networks and metro networks.
We have recently introduced our Adaptive IP solution, which leverages the Adaptive Network vision to deliver end-to-end IP-based services in a more simplified and modular manner than traditional router-based IP network designs. Adaptive IP at the programmable infrastructure layer is built upon the latest generation of our Service Aware Operating System (SAOS) within our Packet Networking platforms, which adds IP capabilities targeted towards 5G, IP VPN services and fiber deep applications. We have also recently introduced our 6500 Packet Transport System (PTS), which combines packet switching, control plane operation and integrated optics. Together with our 3900 platforms, PTS provides our service provider customers with a
9
complete solution to migrate their legacy TDM (SONET/SDH/PDH) services to a scalable, low operational cost packet solution.
Software and Software-Related Services
Our Software and Software-Related Services segment consists of our Blue Planet Automation Software and Services and our Platform Software and Services.
Blue Planet Automation Software and Services.
Our Blue Planet Automation Software is a comprehensive, micro-services based open software suite that allows service providers to use enhanced knowledge about their networks to drive adaptive optimization of their services and operations. Blue Planet facilitates the evolution toward more efficient, modernized network operations with software-defined programmability that accelerates the delivery of on-demand services, reduces costs and enables a path toward a more predictive, autonomous network. We believe our Blue Planet solutions can enable network operators to minimize vendor-specific management silos, reduce network complexity and improve end-to-end service visibility and control. A number of applications can be deployed on the core platform, either individually or in any combination, and include:
|
•
|
Multi-Domain Service Orchestration (MDSO).
Network infrastructures are comprised of multiple technology layers and domains — such as the data center, cloud, metro, access and core networks — and it is often complex for network operators to offer services end-to-end in this environment. Blue Planet enables service orchestration across multiple network (physical and virtual) domains and multiple hardware and software vendors. By using open APIs and intent-based, model-driven templates, Blue Planet simplifies end-to-end services lifecycle management and increases service velocity by abstracting the complexity of underlying domains.
|
|
•
|
Inventory (BPI).
By integrating or “federating” data from multiple existing inventory and assurance systems and presenting it in a single dynamic view, network operators can gain real-time visibility into the topology and state of network and service resources from end to end. Integrating with legacy inventory systems, BPI helps network providers simplify and optimize key operational processes such as service fulfillment, network planning and service assurance. When integrated with other Blue Planet applications, BPI can leverage SDN and NFV to enable even greater levels of automation, deliver more dynamic services and respond more quickly to customers’ rapidly changing requirements.
|
|
•
|
Route Optimization and Assurance (BP ROA).
Optimizing the delivery of IP services across the cloud, BP ROA combines routing, traffic and performance analytics for real-time, path-aware operational monitoring. These capabilities enable forensics for troubleshooting transient network problems that can cause service disruptions. Interactive modeling helps engineers predict the impact of network infrastructure and service changes, simulate new workloads for capacity planning and test failure scenarios to build more resilient networks.
|
|
•
|
NFV Orchestration (NFVO)
. Blue Planet provides network operators with carrier-grade, NFV management and orchestration capabilities for instantiating and managing virtualized network functions and data center resources. NFVO uses an open, vendor-agnostic approach that allows network operators to select and scale those virtual network functions (VNFs) they wish to offer to their end customers.
|
|
•
|
Analytics.
Blue Planet Analytics incorporates big data analytics and machine-learning to generate network insights, thereby helping operators make smarter, data-driven business decisions. Analytics collects, processes and stores data from multiple sources across the network and leverages machine learning innovations for analysis and insights. Analytics enables the visualization and identification of network trends to create profitable services, better predict capacity requirements and anticipate potential network and service disruptions before they happen. We also offer a related Network Health Predictor application that provides preemptive network maintenance across the optical, Ethernet and IP layers of the network.
|
|
•
|
Blue Planet Services
. To complement our software portfolio, we offer a range of related services that include professional services for solution customization, software and solution support services, consulting and design, build-operate-transfer services and technical support relating to our software offerings. These services are focused on enhancing network automation and network analytics, enabling multi-vendor integration and support, and implementing programmable multi-domain next-generation networks.
|
The market relating to these software automation capabilities is in the early stages and, as such, revenue from our Blue Planet Automation Software platform has not been significant to date.
10
Platform Software and Services.
Our software offerings also include our Platform Software, which provides analytics, data and planning tools to assist customers in managing our Networking Platforms products in their networks. Our Platform Software includes:
|
•
|
Manage, Control and Plan (MCP)
. MCP software provides SDN-based domain control of our next-generation packet and optical networks, unifying Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance and Security (FCAPS) management of our multi-layer network infrastructure, with service management and online network planning. Built on Blue Planet’s open, extensible microservices-based architecture, MCP marks a shift from legacy, fragmented network management software, to programmable, cloud-native operations that integrate into network operators’ business processes.
|
Lifecycle operations – including equipment commissioning, service provisioning, assurance and performance monitoring – are greatly automated and simplified through MCP. Providing granular resource management and control, MCP allows network operators to plan to meet customer service needs.
|
•
|
OneControl Unified Management System
. OneControl is an integrated network and service management solution that supports much of our Networking Platform product lines from a single software platform. OneControl offers end-to-end service creation, activation and assurance to enable rapid deployment of next-generation wavelength, OTN and packet services. It also provides visualization of fault and performance information for network health status and enables management functions, including network inventory, network element configuration backup, network element software delivery and security administration.
|
|
•
|
Platform Software Services.
To complement our Platform Software portfolio, we offer a range of related services that include software subscription services, consulting, network migration and integration, installation and upgrade support services, and technical support relating to our Platform Software offerings. These services are focused on enabling our customers to operate their Ciena networks most efficiently, and to modernize their operations through migration to our MCP domain control solution.
|
Our Platform Software offering also includes planning tools and a number of legacy software solutions that support our installed base of network solutions. As we gain further customer adoption of our MCP software platform and we transition features, functionality and customers to this platform, we expect revenue to decline for our legacy Platform Software solutions.
Global Services
To complement our Networking Platforms portfolio, we offer a broad suite of “attached services” that help our customers to design, optimize, deploy, integrate, manage and maintain their communications networks. We believe that our broad set of services offerings is a significant differentiator from our competitors. We believe that our services offerings and our close collaborative engagement with customers provide us with valued insight into network and business challenges faced by our customers, enabling them to achieve their desired outcomes for their network investment. Our services offerings enable us to work closely with our customers in the assessment, planning, deployment and transformation of their networks. We have begun a multi-year transformation process to enhance our service delivery capability and expand our service portfolio. Through these transformation initiatives, we believe we can improve the cost model of our services and drive greater incremental value for our customers in new ways.
Our Global Services portfolio includes a wide range of offerings to meet customer needs and maximize their network infrastructure investment throughout the network lifecycle. These services include:
|
•
|
Planning and Design Services
|
|
•
|
Network advisory, consulting and design services;
|
|
•
|
Network optimization and modernization;
|
|
•
|
Reconfiguration and migration services;
|
|
•
|
Project management services, including staging, site preparation and installation support activities;
|
|
•
|
Deployment Services
|
|
•
|
On-site and remote services to assist in deployment of networks including full turn-key solutions;
|
|
•
|
installation, turn-up and test services;
|
|
•
|
Maintenance and Support Services
|
|
•
|
helpdesk and technical support assistance;
|
|
•
|
spares and logistics management;
|
|
•
|
engineering dispatch, preventive maintenance and on-site professional services; and
|
|
•
|
equipment repair and replacement;
|
11
|
•
|
Managed network services, including 24/7 monitoring through our network operations center (NOC) services; and
|
|
•
|
Analytics to provide insights into network health and operations with actionable recommendations
|
We also provide learning services to educate our customers and sales channels on the implementation, use, functionality and support of our solutions. We provide the services above using a combination of our technical support engineers and qualified and authorized third-party service partners.
Product Development
To remain competitive, we must continually invest in and enhance our Networking Platforms, adding new features and functionality and ensuring alignment with market demand. Through our development efforts we seek to enable network operators to achieve improved economics and efficiency, including with respect to price for performance, power consumption, space requirements and lifecycle operating costs. Our research and development strategy emphasizes software-enabled programmability, automation and open interfaces, and seeks to promote broad application of our solutions, including in submarine, long-haul, metropolitan and access networks, data center interconnect, enterprise networking and packet-based infrastructures for cloud-based service delivery. Our approach is also focused on designing products that address a range of emerging consumption models for networking solutions. Our current development efforts are focused upon:
|
•
|
Enhancing and extending our Packet-Optical and Packet Networking solutions, including:
|
|
•
|
Coherent optical leadership and continued development of our WaveLogic coherent modems to advance transmission speed, spectral efficiency, power usage and reach;
|
|
•
|
Legacy service migration to next-generation packet infrastructures; and
|
|
•
|
Support of fiber densification initiatives, such as 5G and fiber deep.
|
|
•
|
Developing products that enhance software-based network management, automation and control, service orchestration and network function virtualization, and analytics capabilities.
|
Our research and development efforts are also geared toward portfolio optimization and engineering changes intended to drive product and manufacturing cost reductions across our platforms.
We regularly review our existing solution offering and prospective development of new components, features or products, to determine their fit within our portfolio and broader corporate strategy. We also assess the market demand, technology evolution, prospective return on investment and growth opportunities, as well as the costs and resources necessary to develop and support these products. To ensure that our product development investments and solutions offerings are closely aligned with market demand, we continually seek input from customers and promote collaboration among our product development, marketing and sales organizations. In some cases, where we seek to utilize or gain access to complementary or emerging technologies or solutions, we may obtain technology through an acquisition or, alternatively, through initiatives with third parties pursuant to technology licenses, original equipment manufacturer (OEM) arrangements and other strategic technology relationships or investments. In addition, we participate in industry and standards organizations and, where appropriate, incorporate information from these affiliations throughout the product development process.
Sales and Marketing
Our Global Sales and Marketing organization includes a direct sales presence that is organized geographically around the following markets: (i) United States and Canada; (ii) Caribbean and Latin America; (iii) Europe, Middle East and Africa; and (iv) Asia-Pacific, Japan and India. Within each geographic area, we maintain specific teams or personnel that focus on a particular region, country, customer or market vertical. These teams include sales management, account salespersons and sales engineers, as well as services professionals and commercial management personnel, who ensure that we maintain a high-touch, consultative relationship with our customers.
We also maintain and have recently relaunched a global channel program that involves resellers, systems integrators, service providers and other third-party distributors who market and sell our products and services. We utilize these third party channel partners to market and sell our solutions into specific geographies, applications or customer verticals, including submarine networks, governments and Web-scale providers. We see opportunities to leverage these relationships to expand our addressable market, while at the same time reducing the financial and operational risk of entering additional markets.
To support our sales efforts, we engage in marketing activities to generate demand for our products and services. Our marketing strategy is highly focused on building our brand to create customer preference for Ciena, engaging in thought leadership programs to illustrate how our innovations solve customer business problems, and enabling our sales teams to drive customer adoption of our solutions. Our marketing team supports our sales efforts through a variety of activities, including
12
direct customer interaction, account-based marketing campaigns, portfolio marketing, industry events, media relations, industry analyst relations, social media, trade shows, our website and other marketing vehicles for our customers and channel partners.
Operations and Supply Chain Management
Our operations personnel manage our relationships with our third-party manufacturers and global supply chain, addressing component sourcing, manufacturing, product testing and quality, and fulfillment and logistics relating to the distribution and support of our products.
We utilize a sourcing strategy that emphasizes global procurement of materials and product manufacturing in lower cost regions. We rely upon third-party contract manufacturers, with facilities in Canada, Mexico, Thailand and the United States, to manufacture, support and ship our products, and therefore are exposed to risks associated with their businesses, financial condition and the geographies in which they operate. We also rely upon these contract manufacturers and other third parties to perform design and prototype development, component procurement, full production, final assembly, testing and distribution operations. Our manufacturers procure components necessary for assembly and manufacture of our products based on our specifications, approved vendor lists, bills of materials and testing and quality standards. Our manufacturers’ activity is based on rolling forecasts that we provide to them to estimate demand for our products. We work closely with our manufacturers and suppliers to manage material, quality, cost and delivery times, and we continually evaluate their services to ensure performance on a reliable and cost-effective basis.
We currently use distribution partners to fulfill and deliver our products. We believe that our sourcing, manufacturing and distribution strategies allow us to conserve capital, lower costs of product sales, adjust quickly to changes in market demand and operate without dedicating significant resources to manufacturing-related plant and equipment.
As part of our effort to optimize our operations, we continue to focus on driving cost reductions through sourcing, rationalizing our contract manufacturers and supply chain, outsourcing or virtualizing certain activities, and consolidating distribution sites and service logistics partners. These efforts also include process optimization initiatives, such as vendor-managed inventory, and other operational models and strategies designed to drive improved efficiencies in our sourcing, production, logistics and fulfillment.
Backlog
Generally, we make sales pursuant to purchase orders placed by customers under framework agreements that govern the general commercial terms and conditions of the sale of our products and services. These agreements do not obligate customers to purchase any minimum or guaranteed order quantities. Moreover, we are periodically awarded business for new network opportunities or network upgrades following a selection process. In calculating backlog, we only include (i) customer purchase orders for products that have not been shipped and for services that have not yet been performed; and (ii) customer orders relating to products that have been delivered and services that have been performed, but are awaiting customer acceptance under the applicable contract terms. Generally, our customers may cancel or change their orders with limited advance notice, or they may decide not to accept our products and services, although instances of both cancellation and non-acceptance are rare. Backlog may be fulfilled several quarters following receipt of a purchase order, or in the case of certain service obligations, may relate to multi-year support period. As a result, backlog should not necessarily be viewed as an accurate indicator of future revenue for any particular period.
Our backlog was $1.26 billion as of
October 31, 2018
as compared to $1.13 billion as of
October 31, 2017
. Backlog includes product and service orders from commercial and government customers combined. Backlog at
October 31, 2018
includes approximately $226.8 million, primarily related to orders for products and maintenance and support services that are not expected to be filled or performed within fiscal
2019
. Because backlog can be defined in different ways by different companies, our presentation of backlog may not be comparable with figures presented by other companies in our industry.
Seasonality
Like other companies in our industry, we experience quarterly fluctuations in customer activity due to seasonal considerations. We typically experience reductions in order volume toward the end of the calendar year, as the procurement cycles of some of our customers slow and network deployment activity by service providers is curtailed. This period coincides with the first quarter of our fiscal year. This seasonality in our order flows has often resulted in weaker revenue results in the first quarter of our fiscal year. These seasonal effects may not apply consistently in future periods and may not be a reliable indicator of our future revenue or results of operations.
13
Competition
Competition among networking solution vendors remains intense on a global basis. The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, frequent introduction of new networking solutions and aggressive selling efforts, including using significant pricing pressure to displace incumbent vendors and capture market share. Competition for sales of communications networking solutions is dominated by a small number of very large, multi-national companies. Our competitors include Huawei, Nokia, Cisco, Juniper Networks and ZTE. As compared to us, many of these competitors have substantially greater financial, operational and marketing resources, significantly broader product offerings and more established relationships with service providers and other customer segments. Because of their scale and resources, they may be perceived to be a better fit for the procurement or network strategies of larger network operators. We also continue to compete with several smaller but established companies that offer one or more products that compete directly or indirectly with our offerings or whose products address specific niches within the markets and customer segments we address. These competitors include Infinera, ADVA and ECI. We also compete with a number of smaller companies that provide significant competition for a specific product, application, customer segment or geographic market.
Keeping pace with the market’s demands for technology innovation requires considerable research and development investment capacity. As a result, some of our competitors, both large and small, have chosen to rely upon coherent modem technology developed by and procured from third-party “merchant” providers, including Acacia Communications, NTT Electronics (NEL) and Inphi. We may compete with these providers, either indirectly as a result of their technology being a key enabling technology for our competitors, or directly across emerging consumption models as we pursue our strategy of capturing market share within merchant modem sales opportunities.
The principal competitive factors applicable to our markets include:
|
•
|
the ability to meet business needs and drive successful outcomes;
|
|
•
|
functionality, speed, capacity, scalability and performance of network solutions;
|
|
•
|
price for performance, cost per bit and total cost of ownership of network solutions;
|
|
•
|
incumbency and strength of existing business relationships;
|
|
•
|
ability to offer comprehensive networking solutions, consisting of hardware, software and services;
|
|
•
|
time-to-market in delivering products and features;
|
|
•
|
technology roadmap and forward innovation capacity;
|
|
•
|
company stability and financial health;
|
|
•
|
flexibility and openness of platforms, including ease of integration, interoperability and integrated management;
|
|
•
|
ability to offer solutions that accommodate a range of different consumption models;
|
|
•
|
space requirements and power consumption of network solutions;
|
|
•
|
software and network automation capabilities;
|
|
•
|
manufacturing and lead-time capability; and
|
|
•
|
services and support capabilities.
|
As a result of the intense environment in which we compete, winning new opportunities can often require that we agree to unfavorable commercial terms or pricing and other onerous contractual commitments. These terms can adversely affect our results of operations. These terms can also lengthen our revenue recognition or cash collection cycles, add start-up costs to initial sales or deployment of our solutions, require financial commitments or performance bonds and place a disproportionate allocation of risk upon us.
We expect the competition in our industry to continue to broaden and to intensify as network operators pursue a diverse range of network strategies. As these changes occur, we expect that our business will overlap more directly with additional networking solution suppliers, including IP router vendors, data center switch providers and other suppliers or integrators of networking technology traditionally geared toward different network applications, layers or functions. In addition, as we seek increased customer adoption of our Blue Planet Automation Software, and network operator demands for software programmability, management and automation increase, we expect to compete more directly with software vendors and information technology vendors or system integrators. We may also face competition from system and component vendors, including those in our supply chain, who develop pluggable modem technology or other networking products based on off-the-shelf or commoditized hardware technology, referred to as “white box” hardware, particularly where a customer’s network strategy seeks to emphasize deployment of such product offerings or to adopt a disaggregated approach to the procurement of hardware and software.
Patents, Trademarks and Other Intellectual Property Rights
14
The success of our business and technology leadership is significantly dependent upon our proprietary and internally developed technology. We rely upon the intellectual property protections afforded by patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to establish, maintain and enforce rights in our proprietary technologies and product branding. We maintain an incentive program for inventions and patents that seeks to reward innovation and an internal invention review board that selects appropriate protection mechanisms for our technology. We regularly file applications for patents and have a significant number of patents in the United States and other countries where we do business. As of December 1, 2018, we had 1,620 issued U.S. patents, 244 pending U.S. patent applications, 315 issued non-U.S. patents and 154 pending non-U.S. patent applications.
We also rely on non-disclosure agreements and other contracts and policies regarding confidentiality with employees, contractors and customers to establish proprietary rights and to protect trade secrets and confidential information. Our practice is to require employees and relevant consultants to execute non-disclosure and proprietary rights agreements upon commencement of their employment or consulting arrangements with us. These agreements acknowledge our ownership of intellectual property developed by the individual during the course of his or her work with us. The agreements also require that these persons maintain the confidentiality of all proprietary information disclosed to them.
Enforcing proprietary rights, especially patents, can be costly, and we cannot be certain that the steps that we are taking will detect or prevent all unauthorized use. The industry in which we compete is characterized by rapidly changing technology, a large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. We have been subject to several claims related to patent infringement, including by competitors and also by non-practicing patent assertion entities, and we have been requested to indemnify customers pursuant to contractual indemnity obligations relating to infringement claims made by third parties. Intellectual property infringement assertions could cause us to incur substantial costs, including settlement costs and legal fees in the defense of related actions. If we are not successful in defending these claims, our business could be adversely affected. For example, we may be required to enter into a license agreement requiring us to make ongoing royalty payments; we may be required to redesign our products; or we may be prohibited from selling infringing technology in certain jurisdictions.
Our operating system software, Platform Software, Blue Planet Automation Software and other solutions incorporate software and components under licenses from third parties, including software subject to various open source software licenses. As network operators seek to adopt network infrastructures with increased software control and programmability and to utilize an open ecosystem of physical and virtual network resources provided by multiple third parties, we expect to incorporate into our solutions additional elements of open source software or license additional software or technology from third parties. We expect that these network architectural approaches will require increased openness and interoperability of multi-vendor, multi-domain network environments, requiring an increased degree of cooperation among solutions providers. Failure to obtain or maintain such licenses or other third-party intellectual property rights could affect our development efforts and market opportunities, or could require us to re-engineer our products or to obtain alternate technologies. Moreover, there is a risk that open source and other technology licenses could be construed in a manner that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our products.
Environmental Matters
Our business and operations are subject to environmental laws in various jurisdictions around the world, including the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS) regulations adopted by the European Union. We are also subject to disclosure and related requirements that apply to the presence of “conflict minerals” in our products or supply chain. We seek to operate our business in compliance with such laws relating to the materials and content of our products and product takeback and recycling. Environmental regulation is increasing, particularly outside of the United States, and we expect that our domestic and international operations may be subject to additional environmental compliance requirements, which could expose us to additional costs. To date, our compliance actions and costs relating to environmental regulations have not resulted in a material cost or effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Employees
As of
October 31, 2018
, we had a global workforce consisting of
6,013
employees. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we consider the relationships with our employees to be good. While we have been able to recruit and retain key personnel with the capabilities required by our business and markets, competition for highly skilled technical, engineering and other personnel with experience in our industry is intense. We believe that our future success depends in critical part on our continued ability to recruit, motivate and retain such qualified personnel.
15
Directors and Executive Officers
The table below sets forth certain information concerning our directors and executive officers:
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|||
|
Patrick H. Nettles, Ph.D.
|
75
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
||
|
Gary B. Smith
|
58
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
||
|
Stephen B. Alexander
|
59
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
|
||
|
James A. Frodsham
|
52
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer
|
||
|
Rick L. Hamilton
|
47
|
|
Senior Vice President, Global Software and Services
|
||
|
Scott A. McFeely
|
55
|
|
Senior Vice President, Global Products and Services
|
||
|
James E. Moylan, Jr.
|
67
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
|
Andrew C. Petrik
|
55
|
|
Vice President and Controller
|
||
|
Jason M. Phipps
|
46
|
|
Senior Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing
|
||
|
David M. Rothenstein
|
50
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
||
|
Bruce L. Claflin (1)(2)
|
67
|
|
Director
|
||
|
Lawton W. Fitt (2)
|
65
|
|
Director
|
||
|
Patrick T. Gallagher (1)(3)
|
63
|
|
Director
|
||
|
T. Michael Nevens (2)
|
69
|
|
Director
|
||
|
Judith M. O’Brien (1)(3)
|
68
|
|
Director
|
||
|
Joanne B. Olsen (1)(3)
|
60
|
|
Director
|
||
|
Michael J. Rowny (2)
|
68
|
|
Director
|
||
_________________________________
|
(1)
|
Member of the Compensation Committee
|
|
(2)
|
Member of the Audit Committee
|
|
(3)
|
Member of the Governance and Nominations Committee
|
Our Directors hold staggered terms of office, expiring as follows: Ms. Fitt, Dr. Nettles and Mr. Rowny in 2019; Ms. O’Brien and Mr. Smith in 2020, and Mr. Claflin, Mr. Gallagher and Mr. Nevens in 2021. In October 2018, Ms. Olsen was appointed to fill a newly created vacancy in the Board of Directors. Accordingly, she will stand for election at the 2019 Annual Meeting of stockholders and, if elected by stockholders, her term of office will expire in 2020.
Patrick H. Nettles, Ph.D.
has served as a Director of Ciena since April 1994 and as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors since May 2001. From October 2000 to May 2001, Dr. Nettles was Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Ciena, and he was President and Chief Executive Officer from April 1994 to October 2000. Dr. Nettles serves as a Trustee for the California Institute of Technology and the Georgia Tech Foundation, Inc. Dr. Nettles also serves on the board of directors of The Progressive Corporation and previously served on the board of Axcelis Technologies, Inc., where he was independent chairman of the board. Dr. Nettles has previously served on the boards of directors of Apptrigger, Inc., formerly known as Carrius Technologies, Inc., and Optiwind Corp, a privately held company.
Gary B. Smith
joined Ciena in 1997 and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2001. Mr. Smith has served on Ciena’s Board of Directors since October 2000. Prior to his current role, his positions with Ciena included Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales. Mr. Smith previously served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for INTELSAT and Cray Communications, Inc. Mr. Smith also serves on the board of directors of CommVault Systems, Inc. and previously served on the board of directors of Avaya Inc. Mr. Smith is a member of the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, the Global Information Infrastructure Commission and the Center for Corporate Innovation (CCI).
Stephen B. Alexander
joined Ciena in 1994 and has served as Chief Technology Officer since September 1998 and as a Senior Vice President since January 2000. Mr. Alexander has previously served as General Manager of Products and Technology and General Manager of Transport and Switching and Data Networking.
James A. Frodsham
joined Ciena in May 2004 and has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer since March 2010 with responsibility for our strategic planning and corporate development activities. Mr. Frodsham previously served as General Manager of Ciena’s former Broadband Access Group and Metro and Enterprise Solutions Group. Prior to joining Ciena, Mr. Frodsham served as chief operating officer of Innovance Networks. Prior to that, Mr. Frodsham was
16
employed in senior level positions with Nortel Networks in product development and marketing strategy. Mr. Frodsham serves on the boards of directors of Innovance Networks and Relogix Inc.
Rick L. Hamilton
joined Ciena in October 2016 and has served as Senior Vice President, Global Software and Services since February 2017. Mr. Hamilton is responsible for managing Ciena’s Blue Planet Automation Software and Services portfolio. Mr. Hamilton previously served as Senior Vice President, Global Services & Automation. Prior to joining Ciena, he served as Corporate Vice President, Professional Services for Juniper Networks from January to October 2016. From January 2004 to December 2015, Mr. Hamilton served with Cisco Systems in various services leadership positions, including most recently as Vice President, Cloud & Managed Services.
Scott A. McFeely
joined Ciena in March 2010 and has served as Senior Vice President, Global Products and Services since May 2018. Mr. McFeely is responsible for all aspects of Ciena’s networking portfolio including research and development activities relating to its Converged Packet-Optical and Packet Networking portfolios, Platform Software and Services, product line management, supply chain operations, and Global Services. From November 2015 to May 2018, Mr. McFeely served as Senior Vice President, Networking Platforms. From March 2010 to October 2015, he served as Vice President, Global Portfolio Management and Business Operations. Mr. McFeely joined Ciena in connection with its acquisition of Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks business, with which he spent more than 20 years in a variety of technical and management roles.
James E. Moylan, Jr.
has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since December 2007.
Andrew C. Petrik
joined Ciena in 1996 and has served as Vice President, Controller since August 1997. He also served as Treasurer from August 1997 to October 2008.
Jason M. Phipps
joined Ciena in 2002 and has served as Senior Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing since February 2017. Mr. Phipps is responsible for Ciena’s global sales organization and its marketing and communications functions. From January 2014 to February 2017, Mr. Phipps served as Vice President and General Manager, North America Sales, during which time he also oversaw the Global Partners & Channels practice, and from March 2011 to December 2013 he served as Vice President, Global Sales Operations. Mr. Phipps has also previously held a number of sales and marketing leadership positions with Ciena.
David M. Rothenstein
joined Ciena in January 2001 and has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since November 2008. Mr. Rothenstein served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel from July 2004 to October 2008 and previously as Assistant General Counsel.
Bruce L. Claflin
has served as a Director of Ciena since August 2006. Mr. Claflin served as President and Chief Executive Officer of 3Com Corporation from January 2001 until his retirement in February 2006. Mr. Claflin joined 3Com as President and Chief Operating Officer in August 1998. Prior to 3Com, Mr. Claflin served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Sales and Marketing, for Digital Equipment Corporation. Mr. Claflin also worked for 22 years at IBM, where he held various sales, marketing and management positions, including general manager of IBM PC Company’s worldwide research and development, product and brand management, as well as president of IBM PC Company Americas. Mr. Claflin currently serves on the board of directors of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., where he is the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Claflin previously served on the board of directors of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).
Lawton W. Fitt
has served as a Director of Ciena since November 2000. From October 2002 to March 2005, Ms. Fitt served as Director of the Royal Academy of Arts in London. From 1979 to October 2002, Ms. Fitt was an investment banker with Goldman Sachs & Co., where she was a partner from 1994 to October 2002. Ms. Fitt currently serves on the boards of directors of The Carlyle Group LP, The Progressive Corporation and Micro Focus International PLC. Ms. Fitt also has previously served on the boards of directors of ARM Holdings PLC and Thomson Reuters Corporation. Ms. Fitt also serves as a director or trustee of several non-profit organizations.
Patrick T. Gallagher
has served as a Director of Ciena since May 2009. Mr. Gallagher currently serves as Chairman of Harmonic Inc., a global provider of high-performance video solutions to the broadcast, cable, telecommunications and managed service provider sectors. From March 2008 until April 2012, Mr. Gallagher was Chairman of Ubiquisys Ltd., a leading developer and supplier of femtocells for the global 3G mobile wireless market. From January 2008 until February 2009, Mr. Gallagher was Chairman of Macro 4 plc, a global software solutions company, and from May 2006 until March 2008, served as Vice Chairman of Golden Telecom Inc., a leading facilities-based provider of integrated communications in Russia and the CIS. From 2003 until 2006, Mr. Gallagher was Executive Vice Chairman and served as Chief Executive Officer of FLAG Telecom Group and, prior to that role, held various senior management positions at British Telecom. Mr. Gallagher is also Chairman of Intercloud SAS, a Paris-headquartered provider of global private cloud connectivity services. Mr. Gallagher previously served on the board of directors of Sollers JSC.
T. Michael Nevens
has served as a Director of Ciena since February 2014. Since 2006, Mr. Nevens has served as senior adviser to Permira Advisers, LLC, an international private equity fund. From 1980 to 2002, Mr. Nevens held various leadership positions at McKinsey & Co., most recently as a director (senior partner) and as managing partner of the firm’s Global
17
Technology Practice. He also served on the board of the McKinsey Global Institute, which conducts research on economic and policy issues. Mr. Nevens has been an adjunct professor of Corporate Governance and Strategy at the Mendoza College of Business at the University of Notre Dame. Mr. Nevens also serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of NetApp, Inc. Mr. Nevens previously served on the board of directors of Altera Corporation.
Judith M. O’Brien
has served as a Director of Ciena since July 2000. Since November 2012, Ms. O’Brien has served as a partner and head of the Emerging Company Practice Group at the law firm of King & Spalding. Ms. O’Brien served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Obopay, Inc., a provider of mobile payment services, from November 2006 through December 2010. From February 2001 until October 2006, Ms. O’Brien served as a Managing Director at Incubic Venture Fund, a venture capital firm. From August 1980 until February 2001, Ms. O’Brien was a lawyer with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where, from February 1984 to February 2001, she was a partner specializing in corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, and general corporate matters. Ms. O’Brien serves on the boards of directors of privately-held companies, Theatro Labs, Inc., Inform, Inc. and MagicCube, Inc. Ms. O’Brien has also previously served on the board of directors of Adaptec, Inc.
Joanne B. Olsen
has served as a Director of Ciena since October 2018. Ms. Olsen previously served as Executive Vice President of Global Cloud Services and Support at Oracle from 2016 until her retirement in August 2017. In that role, she drove Oracle’s cloud transformation services and support strategy, partnering with leaders across all business units. Ms. Olsen previously served as Senior Vice President and leader of Oracle’s applications sales, alliances, and consulting organizations in North America from 2012 through 2016, and from 2010 through 2012 served in various general management positions at Oracle. Ms. Olsen began her career with IBM, where, between 1979 and 2010, she held a variety of executive management positions across sales, global financing and hardware. Ms. Olsen also serves on the board of directors of Teradata Corporation.
Michael J. Rowny
has served as a Director of Ciena since August 2004. Mr. Rowny has been Chairman of Rowny Capital, a private equity firm, since 1999. From 1994 to 1999, and previously from 1983 to 1986, Mr. Rowny was with MCI Communications in positions including President and Chief Executive Officer of MCI’s International Ventures, Alliances and Correspondent group, acting Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance, and Treasurer. Mr. Rowny’s career in business and government has also included positions as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Ransohoff Company, Chief Executive Officer of Hermitage Holding Company, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ICF Kaiser International, Inc., Vice President of the Bendix Corporation, and Deputy Staff Director of the White House. Mr. Rowny has also previously served on the board of directors of Neustar, Inc.
18
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information contained in this report, you should consider the following risk factors before investing in our securities.
Our revenue, gross margin and operating results can fluctuate significantly and unpredictably from quarter to quarter.
Our revenue, gross margin and results of operations can fluctuate significantly and unpredictably from quarter to quarter. Our budgeted expense levels are based on our visibility into customer spending plans and our projections of future revenue and gross margin. Visibility into customer spending levels can be uncertain, spending patterns are subject to change, and reductions in our expense levels can take significant time to implement. A significant portion of our quarterly revenue is generated from customer orders received in that same quarter (which we refer to as “book to revenue”). Accordingly, our revenue for a particular quarter is difficult to predict, and a shortfall in expected orders in a given quarter can materially adversely affect our revenue and results of operations for that quarter or future quarterly periods. Additional factors that contribute to fluctuations in our revenue, gross margin and operating results include:
|
•
|
changes in spending levels or patterns by customers, particularly with respect to our service provider and Web-scale provider customers;
|
|
•
|
order timing, volume and cancellations;
|
|
•
|
backlog levels;
|
|
•
|
the level of competition and pricing pressure in our industry;
|
|
•
|
the impact of commercial concessions or unfavorable commercial terms required to maintain incumbency or secure new opportunities with key customers;
|
|
•
|
the mix of revenue by product segment, geography and customer in any particular quarter;
|
|
•
|
our level of success in achieving targeted cost reductions and improved efficiencies in our supply chain;
|
|
•
|
the pace and impact of price erosion that we regularly encounter in our markets;
|
|
•
|
our level of success in executing our strategy of capturing additional market share and displacing competitors;
|
|
•
|
our incurrence of start-up costs, including lower margin phases of projects required to support initial deployments, gain new customers or enter new markets;
|
|
•
|
technology-based price compression and the introduction of new platforms with improved price for performance;
|
|
•
|
changing market, economic and political conditions;
|
|
•
|
consolidation activity among our customers and suppliers;
|
|
•
|
the timing of revenue recognition on sales, particularly relating to large orders;
|
|
•
|
installation service availability and readiness of customer sites;
|
|
•
|
availability of components and manufacturing capacity;
|
|
•
|
adverse impact of foreign exchange; and
|
|
•
|
seasonal effects in our business.
|
As a result of these factors and other conditions affecting our business and operating results, we believe that quarterly comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily a good indication of possible future performance. Quarterly fluctuations from the above factors may cause our revenue, gross margin and results of operations to underperform in relation to our guidance, long-term financial targets or the expectations of financial analysts or investors, which may cause volatility or decreases in our stock price.
A small number of customers account for a significant portion of our revenue. The loss of any of these customers or a significant reduction in their spending could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
A significant portion of our revenue is concentrated among a small number of customers. For example, our ten largest customers contributed
56.5%
of our fiscal 2018 revenue. Historically, our largest customers by revenue principally consisted of large communications service providers. For example, AT&T and Verizon accounted for approximately
12.1%
and
10.3
% of fiscal 2018 revenue, respectively. As a result of efforts in recent years to diversify our business, our customer base, including some of our largest customers, currently includes Web-scale providers. In addition to their position among our largest customers by revenue, these customers are increasingly important contributors to our overall growth through both our direct sales to this market vertical and their impact on purchases by other network operators. During fiscal 2018, two Web-scale providers were among our top ten customers. Consequently, our financial results and our ability to grow our business are closely correlated with the spending of a relatively small number of customers in these segments. Changes in their levels of network spending or their consumption models for acquiring networking solutions could adversely affect our operating results.
19
Because a number of our largest customers and our largest customer segment are communications service providers, our business and results of operations can be significantly affected by market, industry or competitive dynamics adversely affecting this segment. Our communications service provider customers continue to face a rapidly shifting competitive landscape as cloud service operators, “over-the-top” (OTT) providers and other content providers challenge their traditional business models and network infrastructures. These dynamics have had an adverse effect on network spending levels in this segment. A number of our service provider customers, including AT&T, with whom we experienced declines in annual revenue during fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018, have announced various procurement initiatives or efforts to reduce capital expenditures on network infrastructure in future periods that may adversely affect our results of operations. Moreover, a number of our communications service providers and cable operator customers, including AT&T, Verizon and Centurylink, have either recently announced significant acquisition transactions or are in the process of significant related integration activities, including the acquisition of media or content companies. Such transactions have in the past, and may in the future, result in spending delays or deferrals, or changes in preferred vendors, due to changes in strategy or leadership, the timing of regulatory approvals and debt burdens associated with such transactions. Our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by these factors and other market, industry or competitive dynamics adversely impacting our customer segments.
We do not have long-term contracts that obligate our customers, including our largest customers, to purchase any minimum or guaranteed volumes, and we conduct sales under purchase orders for which our customers often have the right to modify or cancel. We must regularly compete for and win business with existing customers. Moreover, Web-scale providers tend to operate on shorter procurement cycles than our traditional customers, which can require us to compete to re-win business with these customers more frequently than required with other customers segments. As such, there is no assurance that our incumbency will be maintained at any given customer or that our revenue levels from a customer in a particular period can be achieved in future periods. Customer spending levels can be unpredictable and our sales to any customer could significantly decrease or cease at any time. Our business and results of operations would be materially adversely impacted by the loss of a large customer or reductions in spending or capital expenditure budgets by our largest customers.
We face intense competition that could hurt our sales and results of operations, and we expect the competitive landscape in which we operate to continue to broaden to include additional solutions providers.
We face an intense competitive market for sales of communications networking equipment, software and services. Competition is intense on a global basis, as we and our competitors aggressively seek to capture market share and displace incumbent equipment vendors. A small number of very large vendors have historically dominated our industry, many of which have substantially greater financial and marketing resources, broader product offerings and more established relationships with service providers and other customer segments than we do. In addition, to drive scale and market share gains and meet the intense investment capacity required to keep pace with technology innovation, acquisition activity among vendors of networking solutions has increased. Consolidation in our industry may result in competitors with greater resources, pricing flexibility, or other synergies, that provide them with a competitive advantage.
Moreover, certain customers are adopting procurement strategies that seek to purchase a broader set of networking solutions from a single or small number of vendors. Because of their scale and resources, and a more diverse set of solution offerings, certain of our larger competitors may be perceived to be a better fit for the procurement or network operating and management strategies of large service providers. We also compete with a number of smaller companies that provide significant competition for a specific product, application, customer segment or geographic market. Due to the narrower focus of their efforts, these competitors may achieve commercial availability of their products more quickly or may be more attractive to customers in a particular product niche.
Generally, competition in our markets is based on any one or a combination of the following factors:
|
•
|
the ability to meet business needs and drive successful outcomes;
|
|
•
|
functionality, speed, capacity, scalability and performance of solutions;
|
|
•
|
price for performance, cost per bit and total cost of ownership of solutions;
|
|
•
|
incumbency and strength of existing business relationships;
|
|
•
|
ability to offer comprehensive networking solutions, consisting of hardware, software and services;
|
|
•
|
time-to-market in delivering products and features;
|
|
•
|
technology roadmap and forward innovation capacity;
|
|
•
|
company stability and financial health;
|
|
•
|
flexibility and openness of platforms, including ease of integration, interoperability and integrated management;
|
|
•
|
ability to offer solutions that accommodate a range of different consumption models;
|
|
•
|
software and network automation capabilities;
|
|
•
|
manufacturing and lead-time capability; and
|
20
|
•
|
services and support capabilities.
|
Part of our strategy is to leverage our technology leadership and to aggressively capture additional market share and displace competitors, particularly with communications service providers internationally. In an effort to maintain our incumbency or to secure new customer opportunities, we have in the past, and may in the future, agree to aggressive pricing, commercial concessions and other unfavorable terms that result in low or negative gross margins on a particular order or group of orders. Competition can also result in onerous commercial and legal terms and conditions that place a disproportionate amount of risk on us.
We expect the competition in our industry to continue to broaden and to intensify, as network operators pursue a diverse range of network strategies and consumption models. As these changes occur, we expect that our business will compete more directly with additional networking solution suppliers, including IP router vendors, data center switch providers and other suppliers or integrators of networking technology. In addition, as we seek increased customer adoption of our Blue Planet Automation Software platform, and as network operator demands for software programmability, management and control increase, we expect to compete more directly with software vendors and information technology vendors or integrators of these solutions. We may also face competition from system and component vendors, including those in our supply chain, that develop networking products based on off-the-shelf or commoditized hardware technology, referred to as “white box” hardware, particularly where a customer's network strategy seeks to emphasize deployment of such product offerings or adopt a disaggregated approach to the procurement of hardware and software. Such an increase in competitive intensity, the emergence of new consumption models, or the entry of new competitors into our markets, may adversely impact our business and results of operations. If competitive pressures increase, or if we fail to compete successfully in our markets, our business and results of operations could suffer.
Our business and operating results could be adversely affected by unfavorable changes in macroeconomic and market conditions and reductions in the level of spending by customers in response to these conditions.
Our business and operating results depend significantly on general market and economic conditions. Market volatility and weakness in the regions in which we operate have previously resulted in sustained periods of decreased demand for our products and services, which has adversely affected our operating results. Macroeconomic and market conditions could be adversely affected by a variety of political, economic or other factors in the United States and international markets, which could in turn adversely affect spending levels of our customers and their end users, and could create volatility or deteriorating conditions in the markets in which we operate. Macroeconomic uncertainty or weakness could result in:
|
•
|
reductions in customer spending and delay, deferral or cancellation of network infrastructure initiatives;
|
|
•
|
increased competition for fewer network projects and sales opportunities;
|
|
•
|
increased pricing pressure that may adversely affect revenue, gross margin and profitability;
|
|
•
|
difficulty forecasting operating results and making decisions about budgeting, planning and future investments;
|
|
•
|
increased overhead and production costs as a percentage of revenue;
|
|
•
|
tightening of credit markets needed to fund capital expenditures by us or our customers;
|
|
•
|
customer financial difficulty, including longer collection cycles and difficulties collecting accounts receivable or write-offs of receivables; and
|
|
•
|
increased risk of charges relating to excess and obsolete inventories and the write-off of other intangible assets.
|
Reductions in customer spending in response to unfavorable or uncertain macroeconomic and market conditions, globally or in a particular region where we operate, would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Investment of research and development resources in communications networking technologies for which there is not an adequate market demand, or failure to sufficiently or timely invest in technologies for which there is market demand, would adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
The market for communications networking hardware and software solutions is characterized by rapidly evolving technologies, changes in market demand and increasing adoption of software-based networking solutions. We continually invest in research and development to sustain or enhance our existing hardware and software solutions and to develop or acquire new technologies including new software platforms. There is often a lengthy period between commencing these development initiatives and bringing new or improved solutions to market. During this time, technology preferences, customer demand and the markets for our solutions may move in directions that we had not anticipated. There is no guarantee that our new products, including our Blue Planet Automation Software platform, or enhancements to other solutions, will achieve market acceptance or that the timing of market adoption will be as predicted. As a result, there is a significant possibility that some of our development decisions, including significant expenditures on acquisitions, research and development costs, or investments in technologies, will not meet our expectations, and that our investment in some projects will be unprofitable. There is also a possibility that we
21
may miss a market opportunity because we failed to invest or invested too late, in a technology, product or enhancement sought by our customers. Changes in market demand or investment priorities may also cause us to discontinue existing or planned development for new products or features, which can have a disruptive effect on our relationships with customers. If we fail to make the right investments or fail to make them at the right time, competing solutions may be more attractive in the market. As a result, our competitive position may suffer, and our revenue and profitability could be adversely affected.
Network equipment sales to communications service providers, Web-scale providers and other large customers often involve lengthy sales cycles and protracted contract negotiations that may require us to agree to commercial terms or conditions that negatively affect pricing, risk allocation, payment and the timing of revenue recognition.
Our sales initiatives, particularly with communications service providers, Web-scale providers and other large customers, often involve lengthy sales cycles. These selling efforts often involve a significant commitment of time and resources by us and our customers that may include extensive product testing, laboratory or network certification, network or region-specific product certification and homologation requirements for deployment in networks. Even after a customer awards its business to us or decides to purchase our solutions, the length of deployment time can vary depending upon the customer’s schedule, site readiness, the size of the network deployment, the degree of custom configuration required and other factors. Additionally, these sales also often involve protracted and sometimes difficult contract negotiations in which we may deem it necessary to agree to unfavorable contractual or commercial terms that adversely affect pricing, expose us to penalties for delays or non-performance and require us to assume a disproportionate amount of risk. To maintain incumbency with key customers for existing and future business opportunities, we may be required to offer discounted pricing, make commercial concessions or offer less favorable terms as compared to our historical business arrangements with these customers. We may also be requested to provide deferred payment terms, vendor or third-party financing or other alternative purchase structures that extend the timing of payment and revenue recognition. Alternatively, customers may insist upon terms and conditions that we deem too onerous or not in our best interest, and we may be unable to reach a commercial agreement. As a result, we may incur substantial expense and devote time and resources to potential sales opportunities that never materialize or result in lower than anticipated sales.
If the market for software solutions does not evolve in the way we anticipate or if customers do not adopt our Blue Planet solutions, we may not be able to monetize our software assets and realize a key part of our business strategy.
A key part of our business strategy depends on our ability to commercialize and gain market adoption for our Blue Planet Automation Software platform. If the markets relating to software solutions for network automation, including service orchestration, route optimization, analytics and assurance and SDN or NFV, do not develop as we anticipate, or if we are unable to increase market awareness and adoption of our Blue Planet solutions as a preferred solution within those markets, demand for our Blue Planet solutions may not grow. Our long-term success in the software market will depend to a significant extent on both potential customers recognizing the benefits of our next-generation Blue Planet software solutions, and the willingness of service providers and high-performance data center and other network operators to increase software programmability and automation within their networks. We have a limited history in commercializing and selling these software solutions and have only recently acquired elements of our Blue Planet portfolio to facilitate our go to market strategy for these solutions. Moreover, the market for these solutions is at an early stage, and it is difficult to predict important trends, including the potential growth, if any, of this market. If the market for these software solutions does not evolve in the way we anticipate or if customers do not adopt our solutions, we may not to be able to increase sales of our Blue Planet platform, and a key part of our business strategy would be adversely affected.
Changes in networking or procurement strategies by our customers could adversely affect our business, competitive position and results of operations.
Growing bandwidth demands and network operator efforts to reduce costs are causing network operators to consider a diverse range of approaches to the design and procurement of network infrastructure. We refer to these different approaches as “consumption models.” These consumption models can include: the traditional systems procurement of fully integrated solutions including hardware, software and services from the same vendor; the procurement of a fully integrated hardware solution from one vendor with the separate use of a network operator’s own SDN-based controller; the procurement of an integrated photonic line system with open interfaces from one vendor and the separate or “disaggregated” procurement of modem technology from a different vendor; or the use of published reference designs and open source specifications for the procurement of off-the-shelf or commoditized hardware (often referred to as “white box” hardware) to be used with open source software. In parallel, network operators are also exploring procurement alternatives for software solutions, ranging from integrated and proprietary software platforms to fully open source software. We believe that network operators will continue to consider a variety of different consumption models. Many of these approaches are in their very early stages of development and evaluation, and the types of models and their levels of adoption will depend in significant part on the nature of the circumstances and strategies of particular network operators. Among our customers, AT&T is pursuing network strategies that emphasize enhanced software programmability, management and control of networks, and deployment of “white box” hardware. Other network operators,
22
including our Web-scale customers, are playing a leading role in the transition to software-defined networking or the standardization of communications network solutions. We believe that the potential for different approaches to the procurement of networking infrastructure will require network operators and vendors to evolve and broaden their existing commercial models over time. Adoption of a range of consumption models may also alter and broaden our competitive landscape to include other technology vendors, including component vendors and software vendors. If we are unable to offer attractive solutions and commercial models that accommodate the range of consumption models ultimately adopted by our customers or within our markets, our business, competitive position and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may experience delays in the development and production of our products that may negatively affect our competitive position and business.
Our hardware and software networking solutions, including our coherent optical modem components, are based on complex technology, and we can experience unanticipated delays in developing, manufacturing and introducing these solutions to market. Delays in product development efforts by us or our supply chain may affect our reputation with customers, affect our ability to seize market opportunities and impact the timing and level of demand for our products. The development of new technologies may increase the complexity of supply chain management or require the acquisition, licensing or interworking with the technology of third parties. As a result, each step in the development cycle of our products presents serious risks of failure, rework or delay, any one of which could adversely affect the cost-effectiveness and timely development of our products. We may encounter delays relating to engineering development activities and software, design, sourcing and manufacture of critical components, and the development of prototypes. In addition, intellectual property disputes, failure of critical design elements and other execution risks may delay or even prevent the release of these products. If we do not successfully develop or produce products in a timely manner, our competitive position may suffer, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.
We rely upon third-party contract manufacturers and our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by risks associated with their businesses, financial condition and the geographies in which they operate.
We rely upon third-party contract manufacturers with facilities in Canada, Mexico, Thailand and the United States to perform a substantial portion of our supply chain activities, including component sourcing, manufacturing, product testing and quality, and fulfillment and logistics relating to the distribution and support of our products. There are a number of risks associated with our dependence on contract manufacturers, including:
|
•
|
reduced control over delivery schedules and planning;
|
|
•
|
reliance on the quality assurance procedures of third parties;
|
|
•
|
potential uncertainty regarding manufacturing yields and costs;
|
|
•
|
availability of manufacturing capability and capacity, particularly during periods of high demand;
|
|
•
|
risks and uncertainties associated with the locations or countries where our products are manufactured, including potential manufacturing disruptions caused by social, geopolitical or environmental factors;
|
|
•
|
changes in U.S. law or policy governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the countries where we currently manufacture our products, including the World Trade Organization Information Technology Agreement or other free trade agreements;
|
|
•
|
limited warranties provided to us; and
|
|
•
|
potential misappropriation of our intellectual property.
|
These and other risks could impair our ability to fulfill orders, harm our sales and impact our reputation with customers. If our contract manufacturers are unable or unwilling to continue manufacturing our products or components of our products, or if our contract manufacturers discontinue operations, we may be required to identify and qualify alternative manufacturers, which could cause us to be unable to meet our supply requirements to our customers and result in the breach of our customer agreements. The process of qualifying a new contract manufacturer and commencing volume production is expensive and time-consuming, and if we are required to change or qualify a new contract manufacturer, we would likely lose sales revenue and damage our existing customer relationships.
A substantial portion of our products are manufactured by third-party contract manufacturers in Mexico. The United States, Canada and Mexico have only recently reached an agreement to update the North American Free Trade Agreement. The new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement is not yet in effect and requires additional approvals, including legislative approval. In addition, the U.S. has generally indicated a willingness to revise, renegotiate, or terminate various multilateral trade agreements and to impose new taxes on certain goods imported into the U.S. Such steps, if adopted, could adversely impact our business and operations, and may make our products less competitive in the U.S. and other markets. At this time, it remains unclear what additional actions, if any, will be taken by the U.S. government with respect to such trade agreements, tax policy related to international commerce, or the imposition of tariffs on goods imported into the U.S. There can be no assurance that any future
23
legislation or executive action in the U.S. relating to tax policy and trade regulation would not adversely affect our business, operations and financial results.
Our reliance upon third-party component suppliers, including sole and limited source suppliers, exposes our business to additional risk and could limit our sales, increase our costs and harm our customer relationships.
We maintain a global sourcing strategy and depend on third-party suppliers in international markets for support in our product design and development, and in the sourcing of key product components and subsystems. Our products include optical and electronic components for which reliable, high-volume supply is often available only from sole or limited sources. We do not have any guarantees of supply from our third-party suppliers, and in certain cases we have limited contractual arrangements or are relying upon standard purchase orders. As a result, there is no assurance that we will be able to secure the components or subsystems that we require, in sufficient quantity and quality, and on reasonable terms. The loss of a source of supply, or lack of sufficient availability of key components, could require that we locate an alternate source or redesign our products, either of which could result in business interruption and increased costs and could negatively affect our product gross margin and results of operations. There are a number of significant technology trends or developments underway or emerging, including the Internet of Things, autonomous vehicles and mobile communication adoption, that have during fiscal 2018 and can be expected in the future to result in increased market demand for key raw materials or components. Increases in market demand or scarcity of resources or manufacturing capability have resulted, and may in the future result, in shortages in availability of important components for our solutions, product allocation challenges, deployment delays and increased lead times and delivery cycles.
We are exposed to risks relating to unfavorable economic conditions and a wide range of challenges affecting the businesses and results of operations of our component suppliers. These challenges can affect their material costs, sales, liquidity levels, ability to continue investing in their businesses, ability to import or export goods, ability to meet development commitments and manufacturing capability. For example, there have been a number of recent geopolitical events involving the governments of the United States and China – including potential tariffs and trade restrictions by both countries and China’s announcement of a five-year plan to invest in a domestic optical components industry – may have an adverse impact on certain of our component suppliers in one or more of these respects. These and other industry, market and regulatory disruptions and challenges affecting our suppliers could expose our business to increased costs, loss or lack of supply, or discontinuation of components that can result in lost revenue, additional product costs, increased lead times and deployment delays that could harm our business and customer relationships.
We have experienced, and may experience in the future, consolidation among suppliers of our components. Consolidation in the optical components and semiconductor industry can result in a reduction in the number of suppliers available to us, which can negatively impact our ability to access components or the price we have to pay for such components. Moreover, our access to necessary components could be adversely impacted by evolving competitive landscapes, converging solutions offerings and competition from component vendors, including those in our supply chain, that develop competing networking products for emerging consumptions models, including pluggable modem technology or offerings based on off-the-shelf or commoditized hardware technology, referred to as “white box” hardware.
Our business and results of operations would be negatively affected if we were to experience any significant disruption or difficulties with key suppliers affecting the price, quality, availability or timely delivery of required components.
Product performance problems and undetected errors affecting the performance, reliability or security of our products could damage our business reputation and negatively affect our results of operations.
The development and production of sophisticated hardware and software for communications network equipment is highly complex. Some of our products can be fully tested only when deployed in communications networks or when carrying traffic with other equipment, and software products may contain bugs that can interfere with expected performance. As a result, undetected defects or errors, and product quality, interoperability, reliability and performance problems are often more acute for initial deployments of new products and product enhancements. We have recently launched, and are in the process of launching, a number of new hardware and software offerings, including evolutions of our WaveLogic coherent optical chipset, packet networking platforms and solutions targeting access and metro networks and data center interconnect applications. Unanticipated product performance problems can relate to the design, manufacturing, installation, operation and interoperability of our products. Undetected errors can also arise as a result of defects in components, software or manufacturing, installation or maintenance services supplied by third parties, and technology acquired from or licensed by third parties. From time to time we have had to replace certain components, provide software remedies or other remediation in response to defects or bugs, and we may have to do so again in the future. Remediation of such events could materially adversely impact our business and results of operations. In addition, we may encounter unanticipated security vulnerabilities relating to our products or the activities of our supply chain. Our products are used customer networks transmitting a range of sensitive information and any actual or perceived
24
exposure of our solutions to malicious software or cyber-attacks, could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Product performance, reliability, security and quality problems can negatively affect our business, and may result in some or all of the following effects:
|
•
|
damage to our reputation, declining sales and order cancellations;
|
|
•
|
increased costs to remediate defects or replace products;
|
|
•
|
payment of liquidated damages, contractual or similar penalties, or other claims for performance failures or delays;
|
|
•
|
increased warranty expense or estimates resulting from higher failure rates, additional field service obligations or other rework costs related to defects;
|
|
•
|
increased inventory obsolescence;
|
|
•
|
costs, liabilities and claims that may not be covered by insurance coverage or recoverable from third parties; and
|
|
•
|
delays in recognizing revenue or collecting accounts receivable.
|
These and other consequences relating to undetected errors affecting the quality, reliability and security of our products could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
The international scale of our sales and operations exposes us to additional risk and expense that could adversely affect our results of operations.
We market, sell and service our products globally, maintain personnel in numerous countries, and rely upon a global supply chain for sourcing important components and manufacturing our products. Our international sales and operations are subject to inherent risks, including:
|
•
|
social, political and economic conditions in countries outside the United States;
|
|
•
|
effects of adverse changes in currency exchange rates;
|
|
•
|
greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;
|
|
•
|
difficulty and cost of staffing and managing foreign operations;
|
|
•
|
higher incidence of corruption or unethical business practices;
|
|
•
|
less protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;
|
|
•
|
tax and customs changes that adversely impact our global sourcing strategy, manufacturing practices, transfer-pricing, or competitiveness of our products for global sales;
|
|
•
|
compliance with certain testing, homologation or customization of products to conform to local standards;
|
|
•
|
significant changes to free trade agreements, trade protection measures, tariffs, export compliance, domestic preference procurement requirements, qualification to transact business and additional regulatory requirements; and
|
|
•
|
natural disasters, epidemics and acts of war or terrorism.
|
Our international operations are subject to complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations, including anti-bribery and corruption laws, antitrust or competition laws, environmental regulations and data privacy laws, among others. In particular, recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-bribery law enforcement activity by U.S. regulators, and we currently operate and seek to operate in many parts of the world that are recognized as having a greater potential for corruption. Violations of any of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties, criminal sanctions against us or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business and on our ability to offer our products and services in certain geographies, and significant harm to our business reputation. We cannot assure that our policies and procedures to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations and to mitigate these risks will protect us from all acts committed by our employees or third-party vendors, including contractors, agents and services partners. Additionally, the costs of complying with these laws (including the costs of investigations, auditing and monitoring) could adversely affect our current or future business.
The U.S. government has indicated a willingness to revise, renegotiate, or terminate various, existing multilateral trade agreements and to impose new taxes on certain goods imported into the U.S. Because we rely upon a global sourcing strategy and third-party contract manufacturers in markets outside of the U.S. to perform substantially all of the manufacturing of our products, such steps, if adopted, could adversely impact our business and operations, and may make our products less competitive in the U.S. and other markets. At this time, it remains unclear what additional actions, if any, the U.S. government will take with respect to such trade agreements, tax policy related to international commerce, or imposition of tariffs on goods imported into the U.S. There can be no assurance that any future legislation or executive action in the U.S. relating to tax policy and trade regulation would not adversely affect our business, operations and financial results.
The success of our international sales and operations will depend, in large part, on our ability to anticipate and manage effectively these risks. Our failure to manage any of these risks could harm our international operations, reduce our international sales, and could give rise to liabilities, costs or other business difficulties that could adversely affect our operations and financial results.
25
We may be required to write off significant amounts of inventory as a result of our inventory purchase practices, the obsolescence of product lines or unfavorable market or contractual conditions.
To avoid delays and meet customer demand for shorter delivery terms, we place orders with our contract manufacturers and component suppliers based on forecasts of customer demand. In a number of cases these suppliers may require longer lead times for fulfillment than we have with our customers. Thus, our practice of buying inventory based on forecasted demand exposes us to the risk that our customers ultimately may not order the products we have forecast or will purchase fewer products than forecast. As a result, we may purchase inventory in anticipation of sales that ultimately do not occur. We regularly incur, on a quarterly basis, expense provisions against excess or obsolete inventory. Market uncertainty can also limit our visibility into customer spending plans and compound the difficulty of forecasting inventory at appropriate levels. Moreover, our customer purchase agreements generally do not include any minimum purchase commitment. Also, customers often have the right to modify, reduce or cancel purchase quantities, and spending levels can be uncertain and subject to significant fluctuation. Our products are highly configurable, and certain new products have overlapping feature sets or application with existing products. Accordingly, it is increasingly possible that customers may forgo purchases of certain products we have inventoried in favor of a similar, newer product. We may also be exposed to the risk of inventory write-offs as a result of certain supply chain initiatives, including consolidation and transfer of key manufacturing activities. If we are required to write off or write down a significant amount of inventory, our results of operations for the applicable period would be materially adversely affected.
Our go to market activities and the distribution of our WaveLogic coherent technology within the merchant modem market could expose us to increased or new forms of competition, or adversely affect our systems business and results of operations.
We recently entered the merchant modem market to monetize our coherent optical technology, expand our addressable market and address a range of customer consumption models for networking solutions. Making our critical technology available in this manner could adversely impact the sale of products in our existing systems business. For example, our customers may choose to adopt disaggregated consumption models or third-party solutions that embed Ciena-designed optical modules instead of purchasing systems-based solutions from us. Accordingly, we may encounter situations where we are competing for opportunities in the market directly against a system from one of our competitors that incorporates Ciena-designed modules. Making this key technology available and enabling third-party sales of Ciena-designed modules may adversely affect our competitive position and increase the risk that third parties misappropriate or attempt to use our technology or related intellectual property without our authorization. These and other risks or unanticipated liabilities or costs associated with the sales of our WaveLogic coherent technology could harm our reputation and adversely affect our business and our results of operations. Our go to market activities and the distribution of our WaveLogic coherent technology within the merchant modem market could expose us to increased or new forms of competition, or adversely affect our systems business and results of operation.
Efforts to increase our sales and capture market share in targeted international markets may be unsuccessful.
Part of our business and growth strategy is to expand our geographic reach and increase market share in international markets through a combination of direct and indirect sales resources. We are also aggressively pursuing opportunities with service provider customers in additional geographies, including Asia-Pacific and India. This diversification of our markets and customer base has been a significant component of the growth of our business. Our efforts to continue to increase our sales and capture market share in international markets may ultimately be unsuccessful or may adversely impact our financial results, including our gross margin. Our failure to continue to increase our sales and market share in international markets could limit our growth and could harm our results of operations.
Our intellectual property rights may be difficult and costly to enforce.
We generally rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to establish and maintain proprietary rights in our products and technology. Although we have been issued numerous patents and other patent applications are currently pending, there can be no assurance that any of these patents or other proprietary rights will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that our rights will provide us with any competitive advantage. In addition, there can be no assurance that patents will be issued from pending applications or that claims allowed on any patents will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. Further, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.
We are subject to the risk that third parties may attempt to access, divert or use our intellectual property without authorization. Protecting against the unauthorized use of our products, technology and other proprietary rights is difficult, time-consuming and expensive, and we cannot be certain that the steps that we are taking will prevent or minimize the risks of such unauthorized use. In addition, our intellectual property strategy must continually evolve to protect our proprietary rights in new solutions, including our software solutions. Litigation may be necessary to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights or to
26
determine the validity or scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of management time and resources, and there can be no assurance that we will obtain a successful result. Any inability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights could harm our ability to compete effectively.
We may incur significant costs in response to claims by others that we infringe their intellectual property rights.
From time to time third parties may assert claims or initiate litigation or other proceedings related to patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies and related standards that are relevant to our business. The rate of infringement assertions by patent assertion entities is increasing, particularly in the United States. Generally, these patent owners neither manufacture nor use the patented invention directly, and they seek to derive value from their ownership solely through royalties from patent licensing programs.
We could be adversely affected by litigation, other proceedings or claims against us, as well as claims against our manufacturers, suppliers or customers, alleging infringement of third-party proprietary rights by our products and technology, or components thereof. Regardless of the merit of these claims, they can be time-consuming, divert the time and attention of our technical and management personnel, and result in costly litigation. These claims, if successful, could require us to:
|
•
|
pay substantial damages or royalties;
|
|
•
|
comply with an injunction or other court order that could prevent us from offering certain of our products;
|
|
•
|
seek a license for the use of certain intellectual property, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all;
|
|
•
|
develop non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense and ultimately may not be successful; and
|
|
•
|
indemnify our customers or other third parties pursuant to contractual obligations to hold them harmless or pay expenses or damages on their behalf.
|
Any of these events could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our exposure to risks associated with the use of intellectual property may increase as a result of acquisitions, as we would have a lower level of visibility into the development process with respect to such technology and the steps taken to safeguard against the risks of infringing the rights of third parties.
Our products incorporate software and other technology under license from third parties, and our business would be adversely affected if this technology were no longer available to us on commercially reasonable terms.
We integrate third-party software and other technology into our operating system, network management, and intelligent automation software and other products. As network operators adopt software management and control and virtualized network functions, we believe that we will be increasingly required to work with third-party technology providers. As a result, we may be required to license certain software or technology from third parties, including competitors. Licenses for software or other technology may not be available or may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. Third-party licensors may insist on unreasonable financial or other terms in connection with our use of such technology. Our failure to comply with the terms of any license may result in our inability to continue to use such license, which may result in significant costs, harm our market opportunities and require us to obtain or develop a substitute technology.
Our solutions, including our Blue Planet Automation Software platform, utilize elements of open source or publicly available software. As network operators seek to enhance programmability and automation of networks, we expect that we and other communications networking solutions vendors will increasingly contribute to and use technology or open source software developed by standards settings bodies or other industry forums that seek to promote the integration of network layers and functions. The terms of such licenses could be construed in a manner that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our products. This increases our risks associated with our use of such software and may require us to seek licenses from third parties, to re-engineer our products or to discontinue the sale of such solutions. Difficulty obtaining and maintaining technology licenses with third parties may disrupt development of our products, increase our costs and adversely affect our business.
Data security breaches and cyber-attacks could compromise our intellectual property or other sensitive information and cause significant damage to our business and reputation.
In the ordinary course of our business, we maintain on our network systems, and the networks of our third-party providers, certain information that is confidential, proprietary or otherwise sensitive in nature. This information includes intellectual property, financial information and confidential business information relating to us and our customers, suppliers and other business partners. Companies in the technology industry have been increasingly subject to a wide variety of security incidents,
27
cyber-attacks and other attempts to gain unauthorized access to networks or sensitive information. Our network systems and storage applications, and those systems and storage and other business applications maintained by our third-party providers, have in the past and may in the future be subject to attempts to gain unauthorized access, breach, malfeasance or other system disruptions. In some cases, it is difficult to anticipate or to detect immediately such incidents and the damage caused thereby. If an actual or perceived breach of security occurs in our network, we could incur significant costs and our reputation could be harmed. While we continually work to safeguard our internal network systems and validate the security of our third party providers, to mitigate these potential risks, including through information security policies and employee awareness and training, there is no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to prevent cyber-attacks or security breaches. We have been subjected in the past to a range of incidents including phishing, emails purporting to come from an executive or vendor seeking payment requests, and communications from look alike corporate domains. While these have not had a material effect on our business or our network security to date, security incidents involving access or improper use of our systems, networks or products could compromise confidential or otherwise protected information, destroy or corrupt data, or otherwise disrupt our operations. These security events could also negatively impact our reputation and our competitive position and could result in litigation with third parties, regulatory action, loss of business, potential liability and increased remediation costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on third-party resellers and distribution partners to sell our solutions, and our failure to effectively develop and manage these relationships could adversely affect our business and result of operations.
In order to sell into new geographic markets, diversify our customer base and broaden the application for our solutions, and to complement our global field resources, we rely on a number of third-party resellers, distribution partners and sales agents, both domestic and international, and we expect these relationships to be an important part of our business. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify and qualify these resources or that we will realize the expected benefits of these sales relationships. Our failure to effectively identify, develop and manage our third-party sales relationships could adversely affect our business, growth and result of operations. We must also assess and qualify resellers, distribution partners and sales agents under our channel programs to ensure their understanding of and willingness and ability to adhere to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and ethical business practices. We may be held responsible or liable for the actions or omissions of these third parties. Actions, omissions or violations of law by our third-party sales partners or agents could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our failure to manage our relationships with third-party service partners effectively could adversely impact our financial results and relationships with customers.
We rely on a number of third-party service partners, both domestic and international, to complement our global service and support resources. We rely upon these partners for certain installation, maintenance and support functions. In addition, as network operators increasingly seek to rely on vendors to perform additional services relating to the design, construction and operation of their networks, the scope of work performed by our support partners is likely to increase and may include areas where we have less experience providing or managing such services. We must successfully identify, assess, train and certify qualified service partners in order to ensure the proper installation, deployment and maintenance of our products, as well as to ensure the skillful performance of other services associated with expanded solutions offerings, including site assessment and construction-related services. We must also assess and certify service partners in order to ensure their understanding of and willingness and ability to adhere to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and ethical business practices. Vetting and certification of these partners can be costly and time-consuming, and certain partners may not have the same operational history, financial resources and scale as we have. Moreover, certain service partners may provide similar services for other companies, including our competitors. We may not be able to manage our relationships with our service partners effectively, and we cannot be certain that they will be able to deliver services in the manner or time required, that we will be able to maintain the continuity of their services, or that they will adhere to our approach to ethical business practices. We may also be exposed to a number of risks or challenges relating to the performance of our service partners, including:
|
•
|
delays in recognizing revenue;
|
|
•
|
liability for injuries to persons, damage to property or other claims relating to the actions or omissions of our service partners;
|
|
•
|
our services revenue and gross margin may be adversely affected; and
|
|
•
|
our relationships with customers could suffer.
|
As our service offering expands and customers look to identify vendors capable of managing, integrating and optimizing multi-domain, multi-vendor networks with unified software, our relationships with third-party service partners will become increasingly important. If we do not effectively manage our relationships with third-party service partners, or if they fail to perform these services in the manner or time required, our financial results and relationships with customers could be adversely affected.
28
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
As a company with global operations, we face exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Due to our global presence, a significant percentage of our revenue, operating expense and assets and liabilities are non-U.S. Dollar denominated and therefore subject to foreign currency fluctuation. We face exposure to currency exchange rates as a result of the growth in our non-U.S. Dollar denominated operating expense in Canada, Europe, Asia and Latin America. An increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar could increase the real cost to our customers of our products in those markets outside the United States where we sell in Dollars, and a weakened Dollar could increase the cost of local operating expenses and procurement of materials or service that we purchase in foreign currencies. From time to time, we may hedge against currency exposure associated with anticipated foreign currency cash flows or assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency. Such attempts to offset the impact of currency fluctuations are costly, and we cannot hedge against all foreign exchange rate volatility. Losses associated with these hedging instruments and the adverse effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation may negatively affect our results of operations.
We may be exposed to unanticipated risks and additional obligations in connection with our resale of complementary products or technology of other companies.
We have entered into agreements with strategic supply partners that permit us to distribute their products or technology. We may rely upon these relationships to add complementary products or technologies, to diversify our product portfolio, or to address a particular customer or geographic market. We may enter into additional original equipment manufacturer (OEM), resale or similar strategic arrangements in the future. We may incur unanticipated costs or difficulties relating to our resale of third-party products. Our third-party relationships could expose us to risks associated with the business, financial condition, intellectual property rights and supply chain continuity of such partners, as well as delays in their development, manufacturing or delivery of products or technology. We may also be required by customers to assume warranty, indemnity, service and other commercial obligations, including potential liability to customers, greater than the commitments, if any, made to us by our technology partners. Some of our strategic supply partners are relatively small companies with limited financial resources. If they are unable to satisfy their obligations to us or our customers, we may have to expend our own resources to satisfy these obligations. Exposure to these risks could harm our reputation with key customers and could negatively affect our business and our results of operations.
We are a party to legal proceedings, investigations and other claims or disputes, which are costly to defend and, if determined adversely to us, could require us to pay fines or damages, undertake remedial measures or prevent us from taking certain actions, any of which could adversely affect our business.
In the course of our business, we are, and in the future may be, a party to legal proceedings, investigations and other claims or disputes, which have related and may relate to subjects including commercial transactions, intellectual property, securities, employee relations, or compliance with applicable laws and regulations. A description of certain of these matters can be found in Note
24
, Commitments and Contingencies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Report. Among these matters, in September 2017 we voluntarily contacted the Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice to advise them of an internal investigation that we initiated to determine whether certain payments to an individual employed by a customer in a country in the ASEAN region may have violated applicable laws and regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Legal proceedings and investigations are inherently uncertain and we cannot predict their duration, scope, outcome or consequences. There can be no assurance that these or any such matters that have been or may in the future be brought against us will be resolved favorably. In connection with any government investigations, in the event the government takes action against us or the parties resolve or settle the matter, we may be required to pay substantial fines or civil and criminal penalties and/or be subject to equitable remedies, including disgorgement or injunctive relief. And, other legal or regulatory proceedings, including lawsuits filed by private litigants, may also follow as a consequence. These matters are likely to be expensive and time-consuming to defend, settle and/or resolve, and may require us to implement certain remedial measures that could prove costly or disruptive to our business and operations. They may also cause damage to our business reputation. The unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Our exposure to the credit risks of our customers and resellers may make it difficult to collect receivables and could adversely affect our revenue and operating results.
In the course of our sales to customers and resale channel partners, we may have difficulty collecting receivables, and our business and results of operations could be exposed to risks associated with uncollectible accounts. Lack of liquidity in the capital markets, macroeconomic weakness and market volatility may increase our exposure to these credit risks. Our attempts to
29
monitor customer payment capability and to take appropriate measures to protect ourselves may not be sufficient, and it is possible that we may have to write down or write off accounts receivable. Such write-downs or write-offs could negatively affect our operating results for the period in which they occur, and, if large, could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and operating results.
Growth of our business is dependent upon the proper functioning and scalability of our internal business processes and information systems. Adoption of new systems, modifications or interruptions of services may disrupt our business, processes and internal controls.
We rely upon a number of internal business processes and information systems to support key business functions, and the efficient operation of these processes and systems is critical to managing our business. Our business processes and information systems must be sufficiently scalable to support the growth of our business and may require modifications or upgrades that expose us to a number of operational risks. We continually pursue initiatives to transform and optimize our business operations through the reengineering of certain processes, investment in automation, and engagement of strategic partners or resources to assist with certain business functions. These changes require a significant investment of capital and human resources and may be costly and disruptive to our operations, and they could impose substantial demands on management time. These changes may also require changes in our information systems, modification of internal control procedures and significant training of employees or third-party resources. There can be no assurance that our business and operations will not experience disruption in connection with our current system upgrade or other initiatives. Even if we do not encounter these adverse effects or disruption in our business, the design and implementation of these new systems may be more costly than anticipated.
Our information technology systems, and those of third-party information technology providers or business partners, may also be vulnerable to damage or disruption caused by circumstances beyond our control, including catastrophic events, power anomalies or outages, natural disasters, viruses or malware, and computer system or network failures. We may also be exposed to cyber-security related incidents, including unauthorized access of information systems and disclosure or diversion of intellectual property or confidential data. There can be no assurance that our business systems or those of our third-party business partners will not be subject to similar incidents, exposing us to significant cost, reputational harm and disruption or damage to our business.
Outstanding indebtedness under our senior secured credit facilities may adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations and could limit our business.
We are a party to credit agreements relating to a $250 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility and an outstanding senior secured term loan with approximately
$700.0 million
repayable at maturity in fiscal 2025. The agreements governing these credit facilities contain certain covenants that limit our ability, among other things, to incur additional debt, create liens and encumbrances, pay cash dividends, redeem or repurchase stock, enter into certain acquisition transactions or transactions with affiliates, repay certain indebtedness, make investments, or dispose of assets. The agreements also include customary remedies, including the right of the lenders to take action with respect to the collateral securing the loans, that would apply should we default or otherwise be unable to satisfy our debt obligations.
Our indebtedness could have important negative consequences, including:
|
•
|
increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
|
|
•
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing, particularly in unfavorable capital and credit market conditions;
|
|
•
|
debt service and repayment obligations that may adversely impact our results of operations and reduce the availability of cash resources for other business purposes;
|
|
•
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the markets; and
|
|
•
|
placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage to competitors that have better access to capital resources.
|
We may also enter into additional debt transactions or credit facilities, including equipment loans, working capital lines of credit, senior notes and other long-term debt, which may increase our indebtedness and result in additional restrictions upon our business. In addition, major debt rating agencies regularly evaluate our debt based on a number of factors. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our existing debt ratings, and failure to do so could adversely affect our cost of funds, liquidity and access to capital markets.
Significant volatility and uncertainty in the capital markets may limit our access to funding on favorable terms or at all.
The operation of our business requires significant capital. We have accessed the capital markets in the past and have successfully raised funds, including through the issuance of equity, convertible notes and other indebtedness, to increase our cash position, support our operations and undertake strategic growth initiatives. We regularly evaluate our liquidity position, debt
30
obligations and anticipated cash needs to fund our long-term operating plans, and we may consider it necessary or advisable to raise additional capital or incur additional indebtedness in the future. If we raise additional funds through further issuance of equity or securities convertible into equity, or undertake certain transactions intended to address our existing indebtedness, our existing stockholders could suffer dilution in their percentage ownership of our company or our leverage and outstanding indebtedness could increase. Global capital markets have undergone periods of significant volatility and uncertainty in the past, and there can be no assurance that such financing alternatives will be available to us on favorable terms or at all, should we determine it necessary or advisable to seek additional capital.
The potential effects of the referendum on the UK’s membership in the European Union remain uncertain.
In June 2016, the United Kingdom (UK) held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (EU), commonly referred to as "Brexit," and in March 2017, notified the EU that it intended to exit as provided in Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. The terms of the withdrawal are subject to ongoing negotiation that has created significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the UK and the EU. It is possible that the level of economic activity in this region will be adversely impacted and that there will be increased regulatory and legal complexities, including those relating to tax, trade, security and employees. Such changes could be costly and potentially disruptive to our operations and business relationships in these markets. In addition, Brexit could lead to economic uncertainty, including significant volatility in global stock markets and currency exchange rates, that may adversely impact our business. While we have adopted certain financial measures to reduce the risks of doing business internationally, we cannot ensure that such measures will be adequate to allow us to operate without disruption or adverse impact to our business and financial results in the affected regions.
Restructuring activities could disrupt our business and affect our results of operations.
We have often taken steps, including reductions in force, office closures, and internal reorganizations to reduce the size and cost of our operations, improve efficiencies, or realign our organization and staffing to better match our market opportunities and our technology development initiatives. We may take similar steps in the future as we seek to realize operating synergies, to optimize our operations to achieve our target operating model and profitability objectives, or to reflect more closely changes in the strategic direction of our business. These changes could be disruptive to our business, including our research and development efforts, and could result in significant expense, including accounting charges for inventory and technology-related write-offs, workforce reduction costs and charges relating to consolidation of excess facilities. Substantial expense or charges resulting from restructuring activities could adversely affect our results of operations and use of cash in those periods in which we undertake such actions.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business effectively.
Competition to attract and retain highly skilled technical, engineering and other personnel with experience in our industry is intense, and our employees have been the subject of targeted hiring by our competitors. Competition is particularly intense in certain jurisdictions where we have research and development centers, including the Silicon Valley area of northern California, and we may experience difficulty retaining and motivating existing employees and attracting qualified personnel to fill key positions. Because we rely upon equity awards as a significant component of compensation, particularly for our executive team, a lack of positive performance in our stock price, reduced grant levels, or changes to our compensation program may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key employees. In addition, none of our executive officers is bound by an employment agreement for any specific term. The loss of members of our management team or other key personnel could be disruptive to our business and, were it necessary, it could be difficult to replace members of our management team or other key personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business effectively, and our operations and financial results could suffer.
Strategic acquisitions and investments could disrupt our operations and may expose us to increased costs and unexpected liabilities.
We may acquire or make investments in other technology companies, or enter into other strategic relationships, to expand the markets we address, diversify our customer base or acquire, or accelerate the development of, technology or products. To do so, we may use cash, issue equity that could dilute our current stockholders, or incur debt or assume indebtedness. Strategic transactions can involve numerous additional risks, including:
|
•
|
failure to achieve the anticipated transaction benefits or the projected financial results and operational synergies;
|
|
•
|
greater than expected acquisition and integration costs;
|
|
•
|
disruption due to the integration and rationalization of operations, products, technologies and personnel;
|
|
•
|
diversion of management attention;
|
|
•
|
difficulty completing projects of the acquired company and costs related to in-process projects;
|
31
|
•
|
difficulty managing customer transitions or entering into new markets;
|
|
•
|
the loss of key employees;
|
|
•
|
disruption or termination of business relationships with customers, suppliers, vendors, landlords, licensors and other business partners;
|
|
•
|
ineffective internal controls over financial reporting;
|
|
•
|
dependence on unfamiliar suppliers or manufacturers;
|
|
•
|
assumption of or exposure to unanticipated liabilities, including intellectual property infringement or other legal claims; and
|
|
•
|
adverse tax or accounting impact.
|
As a result of these and other risks, our acquisitions, investments or strategic transactions may not realize the intended benefits and may ultimately have a negative impact on our business, results of operation and financial condition.
Changes in government regulation affecting the communications industry and the businesses of our customers could harm our prospects and operating results.
The Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) has jurisdiction over the U.S. communications industry, and similar agencies have jurisdiction over the communication industries in other countries. Many of our largest customers, including service providers and cable and multiservice network operators, are subject to the rules and regulations of these agencies, while others participate in and benefit from government-funded programs that encourage the development of network infrastructures. These regulatory requirements and funding programs are subject to changes that may adversely impact our customers, with resulting adverse impacts on our business.
In December 2017, the FCC voted to roll back its 2015 order regulating broadband internet service providers as telecommunications service carriers under Title II of the Telecommunications Act. This decision repeals net neutrality regulations that prohibit blocking, degrading or prioritizing certain types of internet traffic and restores the light touch regulatory treatment of broadband service in place prior to 2015. Although the FCC has preempted state jurisdiction on net neutrality, at least two states, Montana and New York have already taken executive action directed at reinstating aspects of the FCC’s 2015 order. In addition, in September 2018, California passed legislation that seeks to reestablish net neutrality. Changes in regulatory requirements or uncertainty associated with the regulatory environment could delay or serve as a disincentive to investment in network infrastructures by network operators, which could adversely affect the sale of our products and services. Similarly, changes in regulatory tariff requirements or other regulations relating to pricing or terms of carriage on communications networks could slow the development or expansion of network infrastructures and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Government regulations affecting the use, import or export of products could adversely affect our operations, negatively affect our revenue and increase our costs.
The United States and various foreign governments have established certain trade and tariff requirements under which we have implemented a global approach to the sourcing and manufacture of our products, as well as the distribution and fulfillment to customers around the world. Changes or restrictions impacting the import of our components to manufacturing facilities outside of the U.S., the importation of finished goods to the U.S., or the export of products globally, would adversely affect our operations, increase our costs and adversely impact our revenue. Government regulation of usage, import or export of our products, or our technology within our products, or our failure to obtain required approvals for our products, could harm our international and domestic sales and adversely affect our revenue and costs of sales. Failure to comply with such regulations could result in enforcement actions, fines, penalties or restrictions on export privileges. In addition, costly tariffs on our equipment, restrictions on importation, trade protection measures and domestic preference requirements of certain countries could limit our access to these markets and harm our sales. These regulations could adversely affect the sale or use of our products, substantially increase our cost of sales and adversely affect our business and revenue.
Government regulations related to the environment, potential climate change and other social initiatives could adversely affect our business and operating results.
Our operations are regulated under various federal, state, local and international laws relating to the environment and potential climate change. If we were to violate or become liable under these laws or regulations, we could incur fines, costs related to damage to property or personal injury and costs related to investigation or remediation activities. Our product design efforts and the manufacturing of our products are also subject to evolving requirements relating to the presence of certain materials or substances in our equipment, including regulations that make producers for such products financially responsible for the collection, treatment and recycling of certain products. For example, our operations and financial results may be negatively affected by environmental regulations, such as the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restriction of the
32
Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS) that have been adopted by the European Union. Compliance with these and similar environmental regulations may increase our cost of designing, manufacturing, selling and removing our products. The SEC has adopted disclosure requirements regarding the use of “conflict minerals” mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries (“DRC”) and disclosure requirements with respect to procedures regarding a manufacturer’s efforts to prevent the sourcing of such minerals from the DRC. Certain of these minerals are present in our products. SEC rules implementing these requirements may have the effect of reducing the pool of suppliers that can supply DRC “conflict free” components and parts, and we may not be able to obtain conflict free products or supplies in sufficient quantities for our operations. Because our supply chain is complex, we may face reputational challenges with our customers, stockholders and other stakeholders if we are unable to verify sufficiently the origins for the “conflict minerals” used in our products and cannot assert that our products are “conflict free.” Environmental or similar social initiatives may also make it difficult to obtain supply of compliant components or may require us to write off non-compliant inventory, which could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.
We may be required to write down the value of certain significant assets which would adversely affect our operating results.
We have a number of significant assets on our balance sheet as of
October 31, 2018
and the value of these assets can be adversely impacted by factors related to our business and operating performance, as well as factors outside of our control. As of
October 31, 2018
, our balance sheet includes a
$745.0 million
net deferred tax asset. The value of our net deferred tax assets can be significantly impacted by changes in tax policy or our tax planning strategy. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) required us to write down our net deferred tax asset by approximately
$438.2 million
in fiscal 2018. If any additional write downs are required, our operating results may be materially adversely affected.
As of
October 31, 2018
, our balance sheet also includes
$298.0 million
of goodwill. We test each reporting unit for impairment of goodwill on an annual basis and, between annual tests, if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. As of
October 31, 2018
, our balance sheet also includes
$486.0 million
in long-lived assets, which includes
$148.2 million
of intangible assets. Valuation of our long-lived assets requires us to make assumptions about future sales prices and sales volumes for our products. These assumptions are used to forecast future, undiscounted cash flows upon which our estimates are based. The value of our net deferred tax asset above may also be subject to change in the future, based on our actual or projected generation of future taxable income. If market conditions or our forecasts for our business or any particular operating segment change, we may be required to reassess the value of these assets. We could be required to record an impairment charge against our goodwill and long-lived assets or a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Any write down of the value of these significant assets would have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial write down or charge, our operating results would be materially adversely affected in such period.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we include in our annual report a report containing management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year and a statement as to whether or not such internal controls are effective. Compliance with these requirements has resulted in, and is likely to continue to result in, significant costs and the commitment of time and operational resources. Certain ongoing initiatives, including efforts to transform business processes or to transition certain functions to third-party resources or providers, will necessitate modifications to our internal control systems, processes and related information systems as we optimize our business and operations. Our expansion into new regions could pose further challenges to our internal control systems. We cannot be certain that our current design for internal control over financial reporting, or any additional changes to be made, will be sufficient to enable management to determine that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. If we are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, market perception of our financial condition and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected, and customer perception of our business may suffer.
Our stock price is volatile.
Our common stock price has experienced substantial volatility in the past and may remain volatile in the future. Volatility in our stock price can arise as a result of a number of the factors discussed in this “Risk Factors” section. During fiscal
2018
, our closing stock price ranged from a high of
$32.07
per share to a low of
$19.57
per share. The stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuation that has affected the market price of many technology companies, with such volatility often unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Divergence between our actual results and our forward-looking guidance for such results, the published expectations of investment analysts, or the expectations of the market generally, can
33
cause significant swings in our stock price. Our stock price can also be affected by market conditions in our industry as well as announcements that we, our competitors, vendors or our customers may make. These may include announcements by us or our competitors of financial results or changes in estimated financial results, technological innovations, the gain or loss of customers, or other strategic initiatives. Our common stock is also included in certain market indices, and any change in the composition of these indices to exclude our company would adversely affect our stock price. These and other factors affecting macroeconomic conditions or financial markets may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock in the future.
Changes in effective tax rates and other adverse outcomes with taxing authorities could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our future effective tax rates could be subject to volatility or adversely affected by changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles, or interpretations thereof. The impact of income taxes on our business can also be affected by a number of items relating to our business. These may include estimates for and the actual geographic mix of our earnings; changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets; the use or expiration of net operating losses or research and development credit arrangements applicable to us in certain geographies; and changes in our methodology for transfer pricing, valuing developed technology or conducting intercompany arrangements. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was signed into law and introduced significant changes to U.S. federal corporate tax law. These changes include a reduction to the federal corporate income tax rate, the current taxation of certain foreign earnings, the imposition of base-erosion prevention measures which may limit the deductions relating to certain intercompany transactions, and possible limitations on the deductibility of net interest expense or corporate debt obligations. Accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act requires significant judgments and estimates that are based on then current interpretations of the Tax Act and could be affected by changing interpretations of the Act, as well as additional legislation and guidance around the Act. Any refinements to tax estimates are difficult to predict and could impact our financial results. We are also subject to the continuous examination of our income tax and other returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities and have a number of such reviews underway at any time. It is possible that tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and an adverse outcome of such a review or audit could have a negative effect on our financial position and operating results. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from such examinations, or changes in our effective tax rates, will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
34
Not applicable.
Overview
. As of
October 31, 2018
, all of our properties are leased, and we do not own any real property. We lease facilities globally related to the ongoing operations of our three business segments and related functions. Our principal executive offices are located in two buildings in Hanover, Maryland.
Our largest facilities are our research and development centers located in Ottawa, Canada and Gurgaon, India. We also have engineering and/or service delivery facilities located in San Jose, California; Petaluma, California; Alpharetta, Georgia; Quebec, Canada; Austin, Texas; Pune, India; and Rostov and Taganrog, Russia. In addition, we lease various smaller offices in the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region to support our sales and services operations. We believe the facilities we are now using are adequate and suitable for our business requirements.
Hanover, Maryland Headquarters Lease
. We entered into an agreement dated November 3, 2011, with W2007 RDG Realty, L.L.C. relating to a 15-year lease of office space for our corporate headquarters in Hanover, Maryland, consisting of an agreed-upon rentable area of approximately 154,100 square feet.
Ottawa Leases.
On October 23, 2014, Ciena Canada, Inc. entered into an 18-year lease agreement for the office building located at 5050 Innovation Drive, Ottawa, Canada, consisting of a rentable area of 170,582 square feet. In addition, on April 15, 2015, Ciena Canada, Inc. entered into a 15-year lease agreement for two new office buildings adjacent to the building at 5050 Innovation Drive, located at 383 and 385 Terry Fox Drive, Ottawa, Canada, consisting of a rentable area of approximately 254,318 square feet.
Gurgaon Leases
. On October 12, 2016, Ciena India Pvt. Ltd. entered into a five-year rental agreement for an office building located at Plot No. 13, Echelon Institutional Sector 32, Gurgaon, which is adjacent to another building rented by Ciena India Pvt. Ltd., located at Plot No. 14, Echelon Institutional Sector 32, Gurgaon. The Gurgaon offices consist of a rentable area of approximately 282,580 square feet.
For additional information regarding our lease obligations, see Note
24
to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
35
The information set forth under the headings “Litigation” and “Investigations” in Note 24, Commitments and Contingencies, in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Report, is incorporated herein by reference.
Not applicable.
36
a) Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the stock symbol “CIEN.”
As of
December 14, 2018
, there were approximately
946
holders of record of our common stock and
156,481,822
shares of common stock outstanding. We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain earnings for use in our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides a summary of repurchases of our common stock during the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2018
:
|
Period
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)
|
Average Price Paid Per Share
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)
|
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
(in Thousands)
|
||||||||||
|
August 1, 2018 to August 31, 2018
|
425,900
|
|
$
|
26.10
|
|
425,900
|
|
$
|
214,097
|
|
||||
|
September 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018
|
319,217
|
|
$
|
30.69
|
|
319,217
|
|
$
|
204,300
|
|
||||
|
October 1, 2018 to October 31, 2018
|
517,566
|
|
$
|
29.53
|
|
517,566
|
|
$
|
189,019
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
1,262,683
|
|
$
|
28.66
|
|
1,262,683
|
|
|||||||
(1) On December 7, 2017, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $300 million of our common stock through the end of fiscal 2020. Shares reported in this table were repurchased under this program. Effective December 13, 2018, this program was terminated and replaced by a new program to repurchase up to $500 million of our common stock. The amount and timing of repurchases are subject to a variety of factors including liquidity, cash flow, stock price and general business and market conditions. The program may be modified, suspended, or discontinued at any time. See Note
19
to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Report for information regarding the share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors.
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total returns for an investment in our common stock, the S&P Telecom Select Index and the S&P Global SmallCap Index from
October 31, 2013
to
October 31, 2018
. The S&P Telecom Select Industry Index comprises stocks in the S&P Total Market Index that are classified in the Global Industry Classification Standard as alternative carriers, communications equipment, integrated telecom services and wireless telecom services sub-industries. The S&P Global SmallCap Index comprises the stocks representing the lowest 15% of float-adjusted market cap in each developed and emerging country. This graph is not deemed to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the graph shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
37
Assumes $100 invested in Ciena Corporation, the S&P Telecom Select Index and the S&P Global SmallCap Index, respectively, on
October 31, 2013
with all dividends reinvested at month-end.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Not applicable.
38
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Part II of this annual report. We have a 52 or 53-week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday nearest to the last day of October in each year. For purposes of financial statement presentation, each fiscal year is described as having ended on October 31. Fiscal
2018
consisted of 53 weeks and fiscal
2017
,
2016
,
2015
and
2014
each consisted of 52 weeks.
|
Year Ended October 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2018
(1) (2) (3) (4)
|
2017
(2) (3) (4)
|
2016
(2) (3)
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
3,094,286
|
|
$
|
2,801,687
|
|
$
|
2,600,573
|
|
$
|
2,445,669
|
|
$
|
2,288,289
|
|
||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
1,314,690
|
|
$
|
1,245,786
|
|
$
|
1,161,576
|
|
$
|
1,075,563
|
|
$
|
948,352
|
|
||||
|
Income from operations
|
$
|
229,946
|
|
$
|
214,722
|
|
$
|
156,169
|
|
$
|
100,448
|
|
$
|
45,704
|
|
||||
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
$
|
493,471
|
|
$
|
(1,105,827
|
)
|
$
|
14,134
|
|
$
|
12,097
|
|
$
|
13,964
|
|
||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(344,690
|
)
|
$
|
1,261,953
|
|
$
|
72,584
|
|
$
|
11,667
|
|
$
|
(40,637
|
)
|
||||
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
$
|
(2.40
|
)
|
$
|
8.89
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
||||
|
Diluted net income (loss) per potential common share
|
$
|
(2.49
|
)
|
$
|
7.53
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
||||
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
143,738
|
|
141,997
|
|
138,312
|
|
118,416
|
|
105,783
|
|
|||||||||
|
Weighted average diluted potential common shares outstanding
|
143,738
|
|
169,919
|
|
150,704
|
|
120,101
|
|
105,783
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
229,261
|
|
$
|
234,882
|
|
$
|
289,520
|
|
$
|
262,112
|
|
$
|
89,816
|
|
||||
|
Cash used for repurchase of common stock - repurchase program
|
$
|
110,981
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Cash, cash equivalents and investments
|
$
|
953,374
|
|
$
|
969,429
|
|
$
|
1,143,035
|
|
$
|
1,021,183
|
|
$
|
776,982
|
|
||||
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
$
|
745,039
|
|
$
|
1,155,104
|
|
$
|
1,116
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,756,523
|
|
$
|
3,951,711
|
|
$
|
2,873,575
|
|
$
|
2,685,001
|
|
$
|
2,058,842
|
|
||||
|
Short-term and long-term debt, net
|
$
|
693,450
|
|
$
|
935,981
|
|
$
|
1,253,682
|
|
$
|
1,264,089
|
|
$
|
1,451,064
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
1,827,189
|
|
$
|
1,815,369
|
|
$
|
2,107,234
|
|
$
|
2,064,125
|
|
$
|
2,128,457
|
|
||||
|
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
$
|
1,929,334
|
|
$
|
2,136,342
|
|
$
|
766,341
|
|
$
|
620,876
|
|
$
|
(69,615
|
)
|
||||
(1) See Note
2
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for additional information regarding the acquisitions of Packet Design, LLC (“Packet Design”) on July 2, 2018 and DonRiver Holdings, LLC (“DonRiver”) on October 1, 2018. See also Note
19
to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Report for information regarding a share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors.
(2) See Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for additional information regarding changes in our short-term and long-term debt.
(3) See Note
18
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for additional information regarding changes in our weighted average basic and diluted potential common shares outstanding.
(4) Net income, deferred tax asset, net, total assets and stockholders’ equity for fiscal 2018 reflect a $472.8 million impact for the remeasurement of the net deferred tax assets and the federal transition tax and fiscal 2017 reflects a $1.2 billion deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversal. See Note
20
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for additional information.
No other factors materially affected the comparability of the information presented above.
39
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.
Overview
We are a networking systems, services and software company, providing solutions that enable a wide range of network operators to deploy and manage next-generation networks that deliver services to businesses and consumers. We provide network hardware, software and services that support the transport, switching, aggregation, service delivery and management of video, data and voice traffic on communications networks. Our solutions are used by communications service providers, cable and multiservice operators, Web-scale providers, submarine network operators, governments, enterprises, research and education (R&E) institutions and other emerging network operators.
Our solutions include a diverse portfolio of high-capacity Networking Platform products, which can be applied from the network core to network access points, and which allow network operators to scale capacity, increase transmission speeds, allocate traffic and adapt dynamically to changing end-user service demands. We also offer Platform Software that provides management and domain control of our next-generation packet and optical platforms and automates network lifecycle operations including provisioning equipment and services. In addition, through our comprehensive suite of Blue Planet Automation Software, we enable network operators to use network data and analytics to drive enhanced automation across multi-vendor and multi-domain network environments, accelerate service delivery and enable an increasingly predictive and autonomous network infrastructure. To complement our hardware and software solutions, we offer a broad range of attached and software-related services that help our customers design, optimize, integrate, deploy, manage and maintain their networks and associated operational environments. Through our complete portfolio of solutions, we enable our customers to transform their network into a dynamic, programmable environment driven by automation and analytics, which we refer to as the Adaptive Network. Our solutions for the Adaptive Network create business and operational value for our customers, enabling them to introduce new revenue-generating services, reduce costs and maximize the return on their network infrastructure investment.
Market Opportunity
The markets in which we sell our communications networking solutions have seen significant changes in recent years, including rapid growth in bandwidth demand, proliferation of cloud-based services and heightened end-user service demands. We have also seen the impact of Web-scale network operators and their services on the business models and network infrastructures of communication service providers. These conditions have placed significant demands on networks and altered the overall competitive landscape of network operators. Existing and emerging network operators are competing to distinguish their service offerings and rapidly introduce differentiated, revenue-generating services, while managing the costs of their networks and seeking to ensure a profitable business model. Network operators are under pressure to constrain their capital expenditure budgets and cannot grow their network spending at the rate of bandwidth growth. As a result, the markets in which we operate expect new and more robust solutions that increase capacity or features and that are more cost-effective to operate. We believe that these dynamics, and the need to adapt to rapidly changing business and network demands, will cause network operators to leverage increased software-based network control and programmability and to evolve their infrastructures to be more automated.
Our Adaptive Network vision and our business strategy to capitalize on these market dynamics include the initiatives set forth in the “Strategy” section of the description of our business in Item 1 of Part 1 of this annual report.
Revenue Growth and Diversification of our Business During Fiscal 2018
During fiscal 2018, our revenue growth accelerated as we benefited meaningfully from our innovation leadership, the diversification of our business and efforts to take market share from competitors. We continue to diversify our solutions offerings and customer base to address fast-growing applications and customer segments, such as Web-scale providers and data center interconnection. These customers were important contributors to our overall growth during fiscal 2018 and are included among our largest customers by revenue. At the same time, a significant portion of our revenue and customer base continues to consist of sales to large communication service providers and cable operators. Our revenue growth benefited from a go-to-market strategy focused on generating new wins and capturing additional opportunities with service providers in international markets, particularly in our Asia-Pacific and India regions. We believe that continued diversification of our business is important to address the dynamic industry environment in which we operate, to continue to grow our business, and to better
40
withstand potential slowdowns which could adversely affect demand from particular geographies, markets, customers or customer segments.
We also believe that current market and competitive dynamics create opportunities for us to leverage our technology leadership and competitive position to displace competitors and capture additional market share. This strategy of share capture was an important contributor to our overall revenue growth during fiscal 2018, and it resulted in, and may continue to result in, fluctuations or reductions in our gross margin.
Investment in Blue Planet Automation Software Platform
We have continued to pursue both organic investment to pursue opportunities in the software automation market and acquisition opportunities to expand our software portfolio and business. On
October 1, 2018
, we acquired DonRiver Holdings, LLC (“DonRiver”), a global software and services company specializing in federated network and service inventory management solutions within the service provider Operational Support Systems (OSS) environment. On July 2, 2018, we acquired Packet Design, LLC (“Packet Design”), a provider of network performance management software focused on Layer 3 network optimization, topology and route analytics.
Balance Sheet Initiatives
Our cash balance and level of indebtedness were influenced by a number of balance sheet initiatives during fiscal 2018, which included the following.
Increased Stock Repurchase Program
. During fiscal 2018, we repurchased
$111.0 million
of our common stock under a stock repurchase program. On December 13, 2018, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a new program to repurchase up to $500 million of our common stock. This program replaces our previously authorized repurchase program, under which we were authorized to repurchase up to $300 million of our common stock through the end of fiscal 2020. We may purchase shares at management’s discretion in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, in transactions structured through investment banking institutions, or a combination of the foregoing. We may also, from time to time, enter into Rule 10b5-1 plans to facilitate repurchases of shares under this authorization. The amount and timing of repurchases are subject to a variety of factors including liquidity, cash flow, stock price and general business and market conditions. The program may be modified, suspended, or discontinued at any time. For additional information, including our repurchase activities under the previously authorized program, see Note
19
and Note
25
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report and Item 5 of Part II of this annual report.
Issuer Conversion of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due December 15, 2020 (“2020 Notes”).
On October 31, 2018, we exercised our option to convert the $187.5 million principal amount outstanding of our 2020 Notes into shares of Ciena common stock. In connection with this conversion, we issued approximately 9.2 million shares and the 2020 Notes ceased to be outstanding. In accordance with the "make-whole" provision, note holders were also entitled to certain additional shares of Ciena common stock upon conversion. We elected to deliver cash in lieu of these additional shares. The amount of cash in lieu of the additional shares was approximately $13.5 million, which was also paid on October 31, 2018. See Note
16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for more information relating to our 2020 Notes.
Settlement Upon Conversion of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018.
On October 15, 2018, both our 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (Original) (the “Original Notes”) and our 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (New) (the “New Notes”) matured. Following conversion elections by the holders thereof, the outstanding Original Notes were converted in advance of maturity on October 15, 2018 and we issued approximately 3.0 million shares of Ciena common stock in settlement of such conversion. The Original Notes thereafter ceased to be outstanding. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we elected to settle conversion of the New Notes in a combination of cash and shares, provided that the cash portion would not exceed an aggregate amount of approximately
$400 million
. Upon conversion of the New Notes by the holders in advance of maturity, on October 15, 2018, we paid in cash an amount of
$288.7 million
representing the aggregate principal amount outstanding of the New Notes. The New Notes thereafter ceased to be outstanding. In addition, because Ciena common stock traded in excess of the
$20.17
per share conversion price during an observation period from October 15, 2018 through November 9, 2018, on November 15, 2018, we paid an additional
$111.3 million
in cash and issued approximately 1.6 million shares with respect to the “in the money” portion of the notes in settlement of the conversion. See Notes
14
and
16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for more information relating to our Original Notes and New Notes.
41
Term Loan Refinancing.
On September 28, 2018, we refinanced our existing term loan in the aggregate principal amount of $394 million, maturing on January 30, 2022 (the “2022 Term Loan”) into a term loan with an aggregate principal amount of $700 million maturing on September 28, 2025 (the “2025 Term Loan”). See Note
16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for more information relating to our term loan refinancing.
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Our results of operations for fiscal 2018 have been impacted by enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) in December 2017. Specifically, our results for fiscal 2018 include a $472.8 million tax charge consisting of the following:
|
•
|
$438.2 million charge related to the remeasurement of U.S. net deferred tax assets at the lower statutory rate under the Tax Act; and
|
|
•
|
$34.6 million charge related to a transition tax on accumulated historical foreign earnings and its deemed repatriation to the U.S.
|
See Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for more information related to the impact of the Tax Act.
42
Consolidated Results of Operations
Operating Segments
We have the following operating segments for reporting purposes: (i) Networking Platforms; (ii) Software and Software-Related Services; and (iii) Global Services. As of the first quarter of fiscal 2018, sales of our Optical Transport products are reflected within the Converged Packet Optical product line of our Networking Platforms segment for all periods presented. See Note
22
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
Fiscal 2018
compared to
Fiscal 2017
Revenue
During
fiscal 2018
, approximately
17.8%
of our revenue was non-U.S. Dollar denominated, including sales in Euros, Canadian Dollars, Japanese Yen, Brazilian Reais, Argentina Pesos, Indian Rupee and British Pounds. During
fiscal 2018
as compared to
fiscal 2017
, the U.S. Dollar fluctuated against these currencies. Consequently, our revenue reported in U.S. Dollars was slightly reduced by approximately
$1.5 million
, or
0.1%
, net of hedging, as compared to
fiscal 2017
due to fluctuations in foreign currency. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
%*
|
2017
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
|||||||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Networking Platforms
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Converged Packet Optical
|
$
|
2,194,519
|
|
70.9
|
$
|
1,939,621
|
|
69.2
|
$
|
254,898
|
|
13.1
|
|
|||||
|
Packet Networking
|
283,499
|
|
9.2
|
313,089
|
|
11.2
|
(29,590
|
)
|
(9.5
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Total Networking Platforms
|
2,478,018
|
|
80.1
|
2,252,710
|
|
80.4
|
225,308
|
|
10.0
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Software and Software-Related Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Platform Software and Services
|
173,949
|
|
5.6
|
145,009
|
|
5.2
|
28,940
|
|
20.0
|
|
||||||||
|
Blue Planet Automation Software and Services
|
26,764
|
|
0.9
|
16,110
|
|
0.6
|
10,654
|
|
66.1
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Software and Software-Related Services
|
200,713
|
|
6.5
|
161,119
|
|
5.8
|
39,594
|
|
24.6
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Global Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Maintenance Support and Training
|
245,161
|
|
7.9
|
227,400
|
|
8.1
|
17,761
|
|
7.8
|
|
||||||||
|
Installation and Deployment
|
128,829
|
|
4.2
|
117,524
|
|
4.2
|
11,305
|
|
9.6
|
|
||||||||
|
Consulting and Network Design
|
41,565
|
|
1.3
|
42,934
|
|
1.5
|
(1,369
|
)
|
(3.2
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Total Global Services
|
415,555
|
|
13.4
|
387,858
|
|
13.8
|
27,697
|
|
7.1
|
|
||||||||
|
Consolidated revenue
|
$
|
3,094,286
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
2,801,687
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
292,599
|
|
10.4
|
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2017 to 2018
|
|
•
|
Networking Platforms
revenue
increased
, primarily reflecting a product line sales increase of
$254.9 million
of our Converged Packet Optical products, partially offset by a product line sales decrease of
$29.6 million
of our Packet Networking products.
|
|
◦
|
Converged Packet Optical primarily reflect sales increases of $252.8 million of our Waveserver stackable interconnect system and $68.9 million of our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform. These increases were partially
|
43
offset by sales decreases of $51.6 million of our 5410/5430 Reconfigurable Switching Systems and $7.9 million of our Z-Series Packet-Optical Platform. Increased sales of our Waveserver stackable interconnect system were primarily to Web-scale providers for data center interconnection applications. As we continue to diversify our business, Web-scale providers represent a growing portion of our business and are included among our largest customers during fiscal 2018. Increased sales of our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform were primarily to communications service providers, Web-scale providers and enterprise customers, partially offset by decreased sales to AT&T, cable and multiservice operators, and government customers.
|
◦
|
Packet Networking reflects a sales decrease of $51.5 million of our 3000 and 5000 families of our service delivery and aggregation switches, primarily related to reduced sales to AT&T. This decrease was partially offset by a sales increase of $16.3 million of our 8700 Packetwave Platform.
|
|
•
|
Software and Software-Related Services segment revenue
increased, reflecting sales increases of $28.9 million of our Platform Software and Services and $10.7 million of our Blue Planet Automation Software and Services.
|
|
◦
|
Platform Software and Services primarily reflect sales increases of $19.2 million in sales of our software and $9.7 million in sales of our software-related services. These increases primarily reflect sales increases of $17.9 million of our Manage, Control and Plan (MCP) software and $7.3 million in sales of our software subscription services.
|
|
◦
|
Blue Planet Automation Software and Services primarily reflects sales increases of $8.4 million of services and $2.3 million of software. Increased services revenue primarily reflects increases of $3.3 million from professional services, $2.7 million in maintenance services and $1.4 million in professional services related to the Packet Design and DonRiver businesses acquired during fiscal 2018, respectively.
|
|
•
|
Global Services
segment revenue
increased, primarily reflecting sales increases of $17.8 million of our maintenance support and training services and $11.3 million of our installation and deployment services.
|
Our operating segments engage in business and operations across four geographic regions: North America; Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”); Caribbean and Latin America (“CALA”); and Asia Pacific and India (“APAC”). Results for North America include only activities in the U.S. and Canada. The following table reflects our geographic distribution of revenue principally based on the relevant location for our delivery of products and performance of services. Our revenue, when considered by geographic distribution, can fluctuate significantly, and the timing of revenue recognition for large network projects, particularly outside of North America, can result in large variations in geographic revenue results in any particular quarter. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
%*
|
2017
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
|||||||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
1,886,450
|
|
61.0
|
$
|
1,736,047
|
|
62.0
|
$
|
150,403
|
|
8.7
|
|
|||||
|
EMEA
|
464,876
|
|
15.0
|
404,099
|
|
14.4
|
60,777
|
|
15.0
|
|
||||||||
|
CALA
|
140,177
|
|
4.5
|
164,308
|
|
5.9
|
(24,131
|
)
|
(14.7
|
)
|
||||||||
|
APAC
|
602,783
|
|
19.5
|
497,233
|
|
17.7
|
105,550
|
|
21.2
|
|
||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
3,094,286
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
2,801,687
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
292,599
|
|
10.4
|
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2017 to 2018
|
|
•
|
North America revenue
primarily reflects sales increases of $112.4 million within our Networking Platforms segment, $29.6 million within our Software and Software-Related Services segment and $8.4 million within our Global Services segment. North America revenue reflects, in part, an annual decline in sales to AT&T from
$448.9 million
in
fiscal 2017
to
$374.6 million
in
fiscal 2018
, as set forth below.
|
|
◦
|
Networking Platforms
segment revenue primarily reflects a product line increase of $150.5 million of Converged Packet Optical sales, partially offset by a product line decrease of $38.1 million of Packet Networking sales. Converged Packet Optical sales reflect an increase of $205.9 million in sales of our Waveserver stackable interconnect system primarily to Web-scale providers, partially offset by a $48.6
|
44
million decrease in sales of our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform, primarily reflecting decreased sales to AT&T, cable and multiservice operators and government customers. Packet Networking sales reflect a decrease of $45.5 million in sales of our 3000 and 5000 families of service delivery and aggregation switches, primarily related to reduced sales to AT&T.
|
◦
|
Software and Software-Related Services
segment revenue primarily reflects sales increases of $20.3 million of our Platform Software and Services and $9.2 million of our Blue Planet Automation Software and Services. Platform Software and Services sales reflect increases of $15.2 million in platform software and $5.1 million in software-related services. These increases primarily reflect sales increases $17.0 million of our Manage, Control and Plan (MCP) software, $3.3 million of software subscription services and $1.5 million of our software training services. Blue Planet Automation Software and Services sales primarily reflect increases of $5.7 million of services and $3.4 million of software.
|
|
◦
|
Global Services
segment revenue primarily reflects sales increases of $6.0 million of our maintenance support and training services and $2.9 million of our installation and deployment services.
|
|
•
|
EMEA revenue
primarily
reflects sales increases of $49.2 million within our Networking Platforms segment, $9.8 million within our Global Services segment and $1.8 million within our Software and Software-Related Services segment.
|
|
◦
|
Networking Platforms
segment revenue primarily reflects a product line increase of $53.0 million in Converged Packet Optical sales, partially offset by a product line decrease of $3.9 million in Packet Networking sales. Converged Packet Optical reflects increases of $32.5 million in sales of our Waveserver stackable interconnect system primarily to Web-scale providers and $22.4 million in sales of our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform to communications service providers, Web-scale providers and enterprise customers.
|
|
◦
|
Global Services
segment revenue primarily reflects sales increases of $8.5 million of our maintenance and training support services and $1.6 million of our installation and deployment services, primarily to communications service providers.
|
|
•
|
CALA revenue
primarily
reflects decreases of $23.3 million within our Networking Platforms segment and $2.9 million within our Global Services segment. These decreases were partially offset by a revenue increase of $2.1 million within our Software and Software-Related Services segment. The decrease in CALA revenue primarily relates to decreased sales to a cable and multiservice operator in Argentina and communications service providers in Brazil.
|
|
•
|
APAC revenue
primarily reflects sales increases of $87.0 million within our Networking Platforms segment, $12.4 million within our Global Services segment and $6.1 million within our Software and Software-Related Services segment, primarily reflecting increased sales in Japan and India.
|
|
◦
|
Networking Platforms
segment revenue primarily reflects product line increases of $72.0 million in Converged Packet Optical sales and $15.0 million of Packet Networking sales. Converged Packet Optical sales reflect sales increases of $114.2 million in sales of our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform to communications service providers and $9.1 million in sales of our Waveserver stackable interconnect system to communications service providers, Web-scale providers and government customers. These increases were partially offset by a $47.0 million decrease in sales of our 5410/5430 Reconfigurable Switching Systems, reflecting decreased sales to certain communications service providers. Packet Networking sales primarily reflect sales increases of $13.1 million in sales of our 8700 Packetwave Platform and $1.9 million in sales of our 3000 and 5000 families of service delivery and aggregation switches, primarily to a certain communication service provider in India.
|
|
◦
|
Software and Software-Related Services
segment revenue primarily reflects sales increases of $4.8 million of our Platform Software and Services and $1.3 million of our Blue Planet Automation Software and Services.
|
|
◦
|
Global Services
segment revenue primarily reflects increases of $9.5 million in sales of installation and deployment services and $3.6 million in our maintenance and training support services.
|
In
fiscal 2018
and
fiscal 2017
, our top ten customers contributed
56.5%
and
55.6%
of revenue, respectively. Consequently, our financial results are closely correlated with the spending of a relatively small number of customers and can be significantly affected by market, industry or competitive dynamics affecting their businesses. Our reliance upon a relatively small number of customers also increases our exposure to changes in their spending levels, network priorities and purchasing strategies. The loss of a significant customer could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, and our results of operations can fluctuate quarterly depending upon sales volumes and purchasing priorities with these large customers. Sales to
45
AT&T were
$374.6 million
, or
12.1%
of total revenue in
fiscal 2018
, and
$448.9 million
, or
16.0%
of total revenue in
fiscal 2017
. Verizon accounted for
$318.0 million
or
10.3%
of total revenue for
fiscal 2018
and
$288.0 million
, or
10.3%
of total revenue in
fiscal 2017
. No other customer accounted for greater than 10% of our revenue in
fiscal 2018
or
fiscal 2017
. While drivers of bandwidth growth and network evolution remain strong, our customers are under constant pressure to constrain their capital expenditure budgets and cannot grow their network spending at the rate of bandwidth growth. As a result, as we innovate and introduce new and more robust solutions that increase capacity or features, there is a market expectation of solutions that are more cost-effective from price for performance perspective than existing or competing solutions. The combination of this regular technology-driven price compression, price competition and pricing pressure in our markets and ongoing customer efforts to manage network costs can impact growth rates in our markets, and requires that we increase our volume of product shipments to maintain and grow revenue
Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit
Product cost of goods sold consists primarily of amounts paid to third-party contract manufacturers, component costs, employee-related costs and overhead, shipping and logistics costs associated with manufacturing-related operations, warranty and other contractual obligations, royalties, license fees, amortization of intangible assets, cost of excess and obsolete inventory and, when applicable, estimated losses on committed customer contracts.
Services cost of goods sold consists primarily of direct and third-party costs associated with our provision of services including installation, deployment, maintenance support, consulting and training activities and, when applicable, estimated losses on committed customer contracts. The majority of these costs relate to personnel, including employee and third-party contractor-related costs.
Our gross profit as a percentage of revenue, or “gross margin,” can fluctuate due to a number of factors, particularly when viewed on a quarterly basis. Our gross margin can fluctuate and be adversely impacted depending upon our revenue concentration within a particular segment, product line, geography, or customer, including our success in selling software in a particular period. Our gross margin remains highly dependent on our continued ability to drive product cost reductions relative to the price erosion that we regularly encounter in our markets. Moreover, we are often required to compete with aggressive pricing and commercial terms and, to secure business with new and existing customers, we may agree to pricing or other unfavorable commercial terms that adversely affect our gross margin. When we have success in taking share and winning new business, it can result in additional pressure on gross margin from these pricing dynamics and the early stages of these network deployments. Early stages of new network builds also often include an increased concentration of lower margin “common” equipment sales and installation services, with the intent to improve margin as we sell channel cards and maintenance services to customers adding capacity or services to their networks. Gross margin can be impacted by technology-based price compression and the introduction or substitution of new platforms with improved price for performance as compared to existing solutions that carry higher margins. Gross margin can also be impacted by changes in expense for excess and obsolete inventory and warranty obligations.
Service gross margin can be affected by the mix of customers and services, particularly the mix between deployment and maintenance services, geographic mix and the timing and extent of any investments in internal resources to support this business.
The tables below (in thousands, except percentage data) set forth the changes in revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
%*
|
2017
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
||||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
3,094,286
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
2,801,687
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
292,599
|
|
10.4
|
|||||
|
Total cost of goods sold
|
1,779,596
|
|
57.5
|
1,555,901
|
|
55.5
|
223,695
|
|
14.4
|
||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
1,314,690
|
|
42.5
|
$
|
1,245,786
|
|
44.5
|
$
|
68,904
|
|
5.5
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2017 to 2018
|
46
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
%*
|
2017
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
||||||||||||
|
Product revenue
|
$
|
2,565,460
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
2,318,581
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
246,879
|
|
10.6
|
|||||
|
Product cost of goods sold
|
1,507,157
|
|
58.7
|
1,308,295
|
|
56.4
|
198,862
|
|
15.2
|
||||||||
|
Product gross profit
|
$
|
1,058,303
|
|
41.3
|
$
|
1,010,286
|
|
43.6
|
$
|
48,017
|
|
4.8
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of product revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2017 to 2018
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
%*
|
2017
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
||||||||||||
|
Service revenue
|
$
|
528,826
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
483,106
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
45,720
|
|
9.5
|
|||||
|
Service cost of goods sold
|
272,439
|
|
51.5
|
247,606
|
|
51.3
|
24,833
|
|
10.0
|
||||||||
|
Service gross profit
|
$
|
256,387
|
|
48.5
|
$
|
235,500
|
|
48.7
|
$
|
20,887
|
|
8.9
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of service revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2017 to 2018
|
|
•
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue, or gross margin
reflects reduced product and service gross profits as described below. We encountered fluctuations or reductions in our gross margin during fiscal 2018 as a result of our strategy to leverage our technology leadership and to aggressively capture additional market share and displace competitors, particularly with communications service providers internationally. We were successful in executing our strategy during fiscal 2018, which allowed us to achieve meaningful revenue growth but which adversely impacted gross margins. Our continued success in implementing this strategy may require that we agree to aggressive pricing, commercial concessions and other unfavorable terms, and result in an increased mix of revenues from early stage deployments, any or all of which may result in low or negative gross margins on a particular order or group of orders.
|
|
•
|
Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue, or product gross margin,
decreased
primarily as a result of our strategy to capture market share as described above and the impact of early stages of international network deployments with communications service provider customers, including an increased concentration of lower margin “common” equipment sales and lower mix of higher margin packet networking sales, partially offset by increased sales of our higher margin software platforms and product cost reductions.
|
|
•
|
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue, or services gross margin,
decreased
slightly, primarily as a result of reduced margins on our software services, which was primarily due to increased costs related to developing resources to promote our growth strategy.
|
Operating Expense
Operating expense increased in fiscal 2018 from the level reported for fiscal 2017 primarily due to increased research and development initiatives and increased selling and marketing resources.
Operating expense consists of the component elements described below.
|
•
|
Research and development expense
primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense (including share-based compensation expense), prototype costs relating to design, development, product testing, depreciation expense and third-party consulting costs.
|
|
•
|
Selling and marketing expense
primarily consists of salaries, commissions and related employee expense (including share-based compensation expense) and sales and marketing support expense, including travel, demonstration units, trade show expense and third-party consulting costs.
|
47
|
•
|
General and administrative expense
primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense (including share-based compensation expense) and costs for third-party consulting and other services.
|
|
•
|
Amortization of intangible assets
primarily reflects the amortization of both purchased technology and the value of customer relationships derived from our acquisitions.
|
|
•
|
Acquisition and integration costs
consist of expenses for financial, legal and accounting advisors and severance and other employee-related costs associated with our acquisition of Packet Design on July 2, 2018 and DonRiver on October 1, 2018. For more information on our acquisitions, see Note
2
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
|
|
•
|
Significant asset impairments and restructuring costs
primarily reflect actions we have taken to better align our workforce, facilities and operating costs with perceived market opportunities, business strategies, changes in market and business conditions and significant impairments of assets.
|
During
fiscal 2018
, approximately
52.6%
of our operating expense was non-U.S. Dollar denominated, including expenses in Canadian Dollars, British Pounds, Indian Rupees, Euros, Brazilian Reais and Australian Dollars. During
fiscal 2018
as compared to
fiscal 2017
, the U.S. Dollar fluctuated against these currencies. Consequently, our operating expense reported in U.S. Dollars increased by approximately
$9.7
million, or
0.9%
, as compared to
fiscal 2017
due to fluctuations in foreign currency. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
%*
|
2017
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
|||||||||||||
|
Research and development
|
$
|
491,564
|
|
15.9
|
$
|
475,329
|
|
17.0
|
$
|
16,235
|
|
3.4
|
|
|||||
|
Selling and marketing
|
394,060
|
|
12.7
|
356,169
|
|
12.7
|
37,891
|
|
10.6
|
|
||||||||
|
General and administrative
|
160,133
|
|
5.2
|
142,604
|
|
5.1
|
17,529
|
|
12.3
|
|
||||||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
15,737
|
|
0.5
|
33,029
|
|
1.2
|
(17,292
|
)
|
(52.4
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Acquisition and integration costs
|
5,111
|
|
0.2
|
—
|
|
—
|
5,111
|
|
100.0
|
|
||||||||
|
Significant asset impairments and restructuring costs
|
18,139
|
|
0.6
|
23,933
|
|
0.9
|
(5,794
|
)
|
(24.2
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
$
|
1,084,744
|
|
35.1
|
$
|
1,031,064
|
|
36.9
|
$
|
53,680
|
|
5.2
|
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2017 to 2018
|
|
•
|
Research and development expense
was adversely affected by
$5.1 million
as a result of foreign exchange rates, net of hedging, primarily due to a weaker U.S. Dollar in relation to the Canadian Dollar. Including the effect of foreign exchange rates, research and development expenses
increased
by
$16.2 million
. This increase primarily reflects increases of $21.7 million in employee and compensation costs, $4.5 million in technology and related costs, $3.2 million in professional services and $1.3 million in depreciation expense. These increases were partially offset by a benefit of $13.6 million for the ENCQOR grant reimbursement and $1.0 million in facilities and information technology costs. For more information on the ENCQOR grant, see Note
24
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
|
|
•
|
Selling and marketing expense
was adversely affected by
$4.3 million
, as a result of foreign exchange rates, primarily due to a weaker U.S. Dollar in relation to the Euro. Including the effect of foreign exchange rates, sales and marketing expense
increased
by
$37.9 million
, primarily reflecting increases of $27.5 million in employee and compensation costs, $3.8 million in selling and marketing costs, $2.7 million in customer demonstration equipment, $1.9 million in professional services, $1.6 million in travel and entertainment costs and $1.5 million in facilities and information technology costs. These increases were slightly offset by a decrease of $1.0 million in depreciation expense.
|
|
•
|
General and administrative expense
increased
by
$17.5 million
,
primarily reflecting increases of $8.5 million in employee and compensation costs, $5.0 million in legal settlements, $4.3 million in professional services and $1.0
|
48
million in facilities and information technology costs. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $2.2 million in legal fees.
|
•
|
Amortization of intangible assets
decreased
due to certain intangible assets having reached the end of their economic lives. The decrease was partially offset by the addition of intangibles related to our acquisitions of Packet Design on July 2, 2018 and DonRiver on October 1, 2018.
|
|
•
|
Acquisition and integration costs
reflect expense for financial, legal and accounting advisors and severance and other employment-related costs related to our acquisition of Packet Design on July 2, 2018 and DonRiver on October 1, 2018.
|
|
•
|
Significant asset impairments and restructuring costs
for fiscal 2018 primarily reflect
$14.9 million
for workforce reductions and
$3.9 million
for unfavorable lease commitments in connection with with a portion of facilities located in Petaluma, California and in Gurgaon, India. For more information on our workforce reductions, see Note
3
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for more information.
|
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
%*
|
2017
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Interest and other income (loss), net
|
$
|
(12,029
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
$
|
913
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
(12,942
|
)
|
1,417.5
|
|
|||||
|
Interest expense
|
$
|
55,249
|
|
1.8
|
|
$
|
55,852
|
|
2.0
|
|
$
|
(603
|
)
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment/modification of debt
|
$
|
(13,887
|
)
|
(0.4
|
)
|
$
|
(3,657
|
)
|
(0.1
|
)
|
$
|
(10,230
|
)
|
279.7
|
|
|||||
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
$
|
493,471
|
|
15.9
|
|
$
|
(1,105,827
|
)
|
(39.5
|
)
|
$
|
1,599,298
|
|
(144.6
|
)
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2017 to 2018
|
|
•
|
Interest and other income (loss), net
primarily reflects a $12.1 million loss reflective of a mark to market fair value adjustment related to the outstanding conversion feature of our “New” 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes and a $7.1 million unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates on assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the relevant functional currency, net of hedging activity. These losses were partially offset by a $7.1 million gain in interest income due to higher interest rates on our investments during fiscal 2018.
|
|
•
|
Interest expense
decreased slightly,
primarily due to a reduction in our aggregate outstanding debt in both fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017. For more information, see Note
16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
|
|
•
|
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
primarily reflects approximately $10.0 million of extinguishment of debt costs related to our conversion of the 2020 Notes and approximately $3.8 million in debt modification costs related to our term loan refinancing which both occurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. For fiscal 2017, this loss reflects $3.6 million in debt modification expenses related to the 2022 Term Loan that was entered into in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and the exchange offer for our “New” 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. For more information, see Note
16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
|
|
•
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
during fiscal 2018 primarily reflects the impact of the Tax Act including $438.2 million in expense for the remeasurement of our net deferred tax assets and a $34.6 million charge related to a transition tax on accumulated historical foreign earnings and their deemed repatriation to the U.S. The fiscal 2017 benefit for income taxes primarily reflects a reversal of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance. See Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for more information.
|
Fiscal
2017
compared to Fiscal
2016
Revenue
49
During
fiscal 2017
, approximately
17.4%
of our revenue was non-U.S. Dollar denominated, including sales in Euros, Canadian Dollars, Brazilian Reais, British Pounds and Japanese Yen. During
fiscal 2017
as compared to
fiscal 2016
, the U.S. Dollar fluctuated against these currencies. As a result, our total revenue reported in U.S. Dollars during
fiscal 2017
was adversely impacted by approximately
$4.9 million
or
0.2%
as compared to
fiscal 2016
. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
%*
|
2016
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
|||||||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Networking Platforms
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Converged Packet Optical
|
$
|
1,939,621
|
|
69.2
|
$
|
1,815,921
|
|
69.9
|
$
|
123,700
|
|
6.8
|
|
|||||
|
Packet Networking
|
313,089
|
|
11.2
|
252,862
|
|
9.7
|
60,227
|
|
23.8
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Networking Platforms
|
2,252,710
|
|
80.4
|
2,068,783
|
|
79.6
|
183,927
|
|
8.9
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Software and Software-Related Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Platform Software and Related Services
|
145,009
|
|
5.2
|
117,251
|
|
4.5
|
27,758
|
|
23.7
|
|
||||||||
|
Blue Planet Automation Software and Related Services
|
16,110
|
|
0.6
|
7,818
|
|
0.3
|
8,292
|
|
106.1
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Software and Software-Related Services
|
161,119
|
|
5.8
|
125,069
|
|
4.8
|
36,050
|
|
28.8
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Global Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Maintenance Support and Training
|
227,400
|
|
8.1
|
228,982
|
|
8.8
|
(1,582
|
)
|
(0.7
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Installation and Deployment
|
117,524
|
|
4.2
|
130,916
|
|
5.0
|
(13,392
|
)
|
(10.2
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Consulting and Network Design
|
42,934
|
|
1.5
|
46,823
|
|
1.8
|
(3,889
|
)
|
(8.3
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Total Global Services
|
387,858
|
|
13.8
|
406,721
|
|
15.6
|
(18,863
|
)
|
(4.6
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Consolidated revenue
|
$
|
2,801,687
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
2,600,573
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
201,114
|
|
7.7
|
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2016 to 2017
|
|
•
|
Networking Platforms
revenue
increased
, reflecting product line sales increases of $123.7 million of our Converged Packet Optical products and $60.2 million of our Packet Networking products.
|
|
◦
|
Converged Packet Optical primarily reflects sales increases of $100.8 million of our Waveserver stackable interconnect system, $61.5 million of our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform, $34.2 million of our 5430 Reconfigurable Switching System and $6.8 million of our OTN configuration for the 5410 Reconfigurable Switching System. These increases were partially offset by sales decreases of $49.9 million of our Z-Series Packet-Optical Platform and $7.4 million of our CoreDirector® Multiservice Optical Switches.
|
|
◦
|
Packet Networking primarily reflects sales increases of $38.7 million of our 3000 and 5000 families of service delivery and aggregation switches, $11.9 million in initial sales of packet networking platform independent software and $10.2 million of our 8700 Packetwave Platform.
|
|
•
|
Software and Software-Related Services
revenue
increased
, primarily reflecting sales increases of $27.8 million in our Platform Software and Services and $8.3 of our Blue Planet Automation Software and Services.
|
50
|
◦
|
Platform Software and Services primarily reflects sales increases of $14.7 million of services and $13.1 million of software. These increases primarily reflect sales increases of $12.7 million of our OneControl Unified Management System and $12.5 million of software subscription services.
|
|
◦
|
Blue Planet Automation Software and Services primarily reflects sales increases of $4.2 million of professional services and $3.4 million of our software related to orchestration and V-WAN applications.
|
|
•
|
Global Services
revenue
decreased
, primarily reflecting sales decreases of $13.4 million of installation and deployment services, $3.9 million of consulting and network design services, and $1.6 million of maintenance support and training services. These sales decreases were primarily due to activity levels in the North America and CALA regions as described below.
|
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
%*
|
2016
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
|||||||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
1,736,047
|
|
62.0
|
$
|
1,689,263
|
|
65.0
|
$
|
46,784
|
|
2.8
|
|
|||||
|
EMEA
|
404,099
|
|
14.4
|
393,705
|
|
15.1
|
10,394
|
|
2.6
|
|
||||||||
|
CALA
|
164,308
|
|
5.9
|
195,085
|
|
7.5
|
(30,777
|
)
|
(15.8
|
)
|
||||||||
|
APAC
|
497,233
|
|
17.7
|
322,520
|
|
12.4
|
174,713
|
|
54.2
|
|
||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,801,687
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
2,600,573
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
201,114
|
|
7.7
|
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2016 to 2017
|
|
•
|
North America revenue
primarily reflects sales increases of $34.7 million within our Networking Platforms segment and $25.7 million within our Software and Software-Related Services segment, partially offset by a revenue decrease of $13.6 million within our Global Services segment.
|
|
◦
|
Networking Platforms
segment revenue primarily reflects product line increases of $29.0 million of Packet Networking sales and $5.8 million of Converged Packet Optical sales.
|
|
▪
|
Packet Networking
primarily reflects sales increases of $15.5 million in sales of our 3000 and 5000 families of service delivery and aggregation switches and $11.9 million of packet networking platform independent software. Packet Networking sales have traditionally been concentrated, with significant sales to AT&T. However, during fiscal 2017, a significant portion of the growth benefited from sales to other network operators.
|
|
▪
|
Converged Packet Optical
primarily reflects a sales increase of $85.7 million of our Waveserver stackable interconnect system, partially offset by sales decreases of $48.2 million of our Z-Series Packet-Optical Platform, $14.8 million of our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform and $13.3 million of our 5430 Reconfigurable Switching System. The revenue increase for our Waveserver stackable interconnect system primarily reflects increased sales to Web-scale providers.
|
|
◦
|
Software and Software-Related Services
reflects sales increases of $22.8 million of our Platform Software and Services and $2.8 million of our Blue Planet Automation Software and Services. Platform Software and Services revenue primarily reflects increases of $11.5 million in sales of our software and $11.3 million in sales of services, principally software subscription.
|
|
◦
|
Global Services
primarily reflects sales decreases of $9.0 million for installation and deployment activities and $5.0 million in maintenance support and training. Installation and deployment activities were impacted by the contribution of sales of our Waveserver stackable interconnect system, which does not typically include installation services.
|
|
•
|
EMEA revenue
primarily
reflects increases of $5.4 million within our Networking Platforms segment and $5.4 million within our Software and Software-Related Services segment.
|
|
◦
|
Networking Platforms
segment revenue primarily reflects product line increases of $3.7 million in Packet Networking sales and $1.7 million in Converged Packet Optical sales.
|
51
|
•
|
CALA revenue
primarily
reflects decreases of $22.1 million within our Networking Platforms segment and $8.9 million within our Global Services segment. The decrease in CALA revenue primarily relates to decreased sales to certain communications service providers in Brazil and to AT&T in Mexico.
|
|
◦
|
Networking Platforms
segment revenue primarily reflects a product line decrease of $25.8 million of Converged Packet Optical sales partially offset by a product line increase of $3.7 million of Packet Networking sales. Converged Packet Optical sales primarily reflect decreases of $15.8 million of our 5430 Reconfigurable Switching System and $3.4 million of our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform.
|
|
◦
|
Global Services
segment revenue primarily reflects reduced installation and deployment activities which reflect the decrease in sales of our Networking Platforms products as described above.
|
|
•
|
APAC revenue
primarily reflects increases of $165.9 million within our Networking Platforms segment, $4.9 million within our Software and Software-Related Services segment and $3.9 million within our Global Services segment. Revenue contribution from India in fiscal 2017 was a significant driver of our annual revenue growth.
|
|
◦
|
Networking Platforms
segment revenue primarily reflects product line increases of $142.0 million of Converged Packet Optical sales and $23.9 million of Packet Networking sales.
|
|
▪
|
Converged Packet Optical primarily reflects an increase of $79.5 million in sales of our 6500 Packet-Optical Platform, primarily due to increases in sales through our strategic relationship with Ericsson in Australia and sales to service providers in India and Japan. The revenue increase within Converged Packet Optical also reflects an increase of $64.3 million of our 5430 Reconfigurable Switching System sales primarily due to a service provider in India.
|
|
▪
|
Packet Networking primarily reflects increases of $15.9 million in sales of our 3000 and 5000 families of service delivery and aggregation switches and $8.0 million in sales of our 8700 Packetwave Platform primarily to certain communication service providers in India.
|
Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit
The tables below (in thousands, except percentage data) set forth the changes in revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
%*
|
2016
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
||||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
2,801,687
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
2,600,573
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
201,114
|
|
7.7
|
|||||
|
Total cost of goods sold
|
1,555,901
|
|
55.5
|
1,438,997
|
|
55.3
|
116,904
|
|
8.1
|
||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
1,245,786
|
|
44.5
|
$
|
1,161,576
|
|
44.7
|
$
|
84,210
|
|
7.2
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2016 to 2017
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
%*
|
2016
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
||||||||||||
|
Product revenue
|
$
|
2,318,581
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
2,117,472
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
201,109
|
|
9.5
|
|||||
|
Product cost of goods sold
|
1,308,295
|
|
56.4
|
1,176,304
|
|
55.6
|
131,991
|
|
11.2
|
||||||||
|
Product gross profit
|
$
|
1,010,286
|
|
43.6
|
$
|
941,168
|
|
44.4
|
$
|
69,118
|
|
7.3
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of product revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2016 to 2017
|
52
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
%*
|
2016
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
|||||||||||||
|
Service revenue
|
$
|
483,106
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
483,101
|
|
100.0
|
$
|
5
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Service cost of goods sold
|
247,606
|
|
51.3
|
262,693
|
|
54.4
|
(15,087
|
)
|
(5.7
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Service gross profit
|
$
|
235,500
|
|
48.7
|
$
|
220,408
|
|
45.6
|
$
|
15,092
|
|
6.8
|
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of service revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2016 to 2017
|
|
•
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue, or gross margin
reflects improved services gross profit partially offset by reduced product gross profit.
|
|
•
|
Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue, or product gross margin,
decreased
primarily as a result of market-based price erosion partially offset by product cost reductions and increased software platform sales.
|
|
•
|
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue, or services gross margin,
increased
, primarily due to increased sales of higher margin software subscription services and decreased sales of lower margin installation and deployment services.
|
Operating expense
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
%*
|
2016
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
|||||||||||||
|
Research and development
|
$
|
475,329
|
|
17.0
|
$
|
451,794
|
|
17.4
|
$
|
23,535
|
|
5.2
|
|
|||||
|
Selling and marketing
|
356,169
|
|
12.7
|
349,731
|
|
13.4
|
6,438
|
|
1.8
|
|
||||||||
|
General and administrative
|
142,604
|
|
5.1
|
132,828
|
|
5.1
|
9,776
|
|
7.4
|
|
||||||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
33,029
|
|
1.2
|
61,508
|
|
2.4
|
(28,479
|
)
|
(46.3
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Acquisition and integration costs
|
—
|
|
—
|
4,613
|
|
0.2
|
(4,613
|
)
|
(100.0
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Significant asset impairments and restructuring costs
|
23,933
|
|
0.9
|
4,933
|
|
0.2
|
19,000
|
|
385.2
|
|
||||||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
$
|
1,031,064
|
|
36.9
|
$
|
1,005,407
|
|
38.7
|
$
|
25,657
|
|
2.6
|
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2016 to 2017
|
|
•
|
Research and development expense
was adversely affected by
$2.0 million
as a result of foreign exchange rates, net of hedging, primarily due to a weaker U.S. Dollar in relation to the Canadian Dollar. Including the effect of foreign exchange rates, research and development expenses
increased
by
$23.5 million
. This increase primarily reflects increases of $17.6 million in employee and compensation costs and $9.5 million in facilities and information technology costs largely due to facilities transitions. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $2.9 million in professional services and $1.1 million in prototype expense.
|
|
•
|
Selling and marketing expense
increased
by
$6.4 million
, primarily reflecting increases of $1.5 million in facilities and information technology costs, $1.5 million in technology and related costs, $1.4 million in employee and compensation costs and $1.1 million in travel and related costs.
|
|
•
|
General and administrative expense
increased by
$9.8 million
, primarily reflecting increases of $4.5 million for employee and compensation costs, $2.9 million for professional services and legal fees and $1.2 million for facilities and information technology costs.
|
53
|
•
|
Amortization of intangible assets
decreased
due to certain intangible assets having reached the end of their economic lives.
|
|
•
|
Acquisition and integration costs
incurred during fiscal 2016 reflects expense for financial, legal and accounting advisors and severance and other employee compensation costs, related to our acquisition of Cyan on August 3, 2015 and our acquisition of certain high-speed photonics components (“HSPC”) assets of TeraXion, Inc. (“TeraXion”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary on February 1, 2016.
|
|
•
|
Significant asset impairments and restructuring costs
during fiscal 2017 primarily reflects a $13.7 million asset impairment related to a trade receivable for a single customer in the APAC region, $5.9 million for workforce reductions and $4.4 million for unfavorable lease commitments and relocation costs incurred in connection with our research and development center facility transitions in Ottawa, Canada. For more information on our workforce reductions, see Note
3
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for more information.
|
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items for the periods indicated:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
%*
|
2016
|
%*
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%**
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Interest and other income (loss), net
|
$
|
913
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
(12,569
|
)
|
(0.5
|
)
|
$
|
13,482
|
|
107.3
|
|
|||||
|
Interest expense
|
$
|
55,852
|
|
2.0
|
|
$
|
56,656
|
|
2.2
|
|
$
|
(804
|
)
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
|
$
|
(3,657
|
)
|
(0.1
|
)
|
$
|
(226
|
)
|
—
|
|
$
|
(3,431
|
)
|
1,518.1
|
|
|||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
$
|
(1,105,827
|
)
|
(39.5
|
)
|
$
|
14,134
|
|
0.5
|
|
$
|
(1,119,961
|
)
|
(7,923.9
|
)
|
|||||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % of total revenue
|
|
**
|
Denotes % change from 2016 to 2017
|
|
•
|
Interest and other income (loss), net
primarily reflects $11.9 million of improved impact of foreign exchange rates on assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the relevant functional currency, net of hedging activity.
|
|
•
|
Interest expense
decreased
slightly, primarily due to a reduction in our aggregate outstanding debt due to the refinancing of our 2022 term loans during the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and the maturity of the 2017 Notes on June 15, 2017. This decrease was offset by higher interest expense related to our new facilities in Ottawa, Canada which are subject to capital lease accounting treatment.
|
|
•
|
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
reflects
$3.6 million in debt modification expenses related to the 2022 Term Loan that was entered into in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and the exchange offer of our New Notes in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.
|
|
•
|
Provision for income taxes
decreased
primarily due to a reversal of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance. See Note
20
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for more information.
|
Segment Profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment profit for the respective periods:
54
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|||||||||||
|
2018
|
2017
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%*
|
||||||||||
|
Segment profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Networking Platforms
|
$
|
581,113
|
|
$
|
578,039
|
|
$
|
3,074
|
|
0.5
|
|||
|
Software and Software-Related Services
|
$
|
69,808
|
|
$
|
32,536
|
|
$
|
37,272
|
|
114.6
|
|||
|
Global Services
|
$
|
172,205
|
|
$
|
159,882
|
|
$
|
12,323
|
|
|
7.7
|
||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % change from 2017 to 2018
|
|
•
|
Networking Platforms
segment
profit
slightly
increased
, primarily due to higher sales volume, partially offset by reduced gross margin as described above and increased research and development costs.
|
|
•
|
Software and Software-Related Services
segment
profit
increased
, primarily due to higher sales volume and lower research and development costs, partially offset by reduced gross margin on software-related services.
|
|
•
|
Global Services
segment
profit
increased
, primarily due to higher sales volume.
|
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment profit for the respective periods:
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
Increase
(decrease)
|
%*
|
||||||||||
|
Segment profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Networking Platforms
|
$
|
578,039
|
|
$
|
544,744
|
|
$
|
33,295
|
|
6.1
|
|||
|
Software and Software-Related Services
|
$
|
32,536
|
|
$
|
7,123
|
|
$
|
25,413
|
|
356.8
|
|||
|
Global Services
|
$
|
159,882
|
|
$
|
157,915
|
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
1.2
|
|||
_________________________________
|
*
|
Denotes % change from 2016 to 2017
|
|
•
|
Networking Platforms
segment
profit
increased
, primarily due to higher sales volume, as described above, resulting in increased gross profits, slightly offset by increased research and development costs. Research and development costs primarily reflect increased expenses relating to the continued development of our coherent modem technology, including our WaveLogic Ai coherent optical chipset, and relocation costs in connection with our research and development center facility transitions in Ottawa, Canada.
|
|
•
|
Software and Software-Related Services
segment
profit
increased
reflecting higher sales volume, as described above, and improved gross margin, partially offset by increased research and development costs. Research and development costs primarily reflect increased expenses relating to the continued development of our Blue Planet software platform.
|
|
•
|
Global Services
segment
profit
increased
, primarily due to improved gross margin, as described above, partially offset by lower sales volume.
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview.
For the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2018
, we
generated
$229.3 million
in cash from operations, as our net
loss
(adjusted for non-cash charges) provided
$380.0 million
which exceeded our working capital requirements of
$150.7 million
. Our net
loss
(adjusted for non-cash charges) reflects a non-cash tax provision of $
463.6 million
primarily related to the enactment of the Tax Act. For additional information on the non-cash tax provision, see Note
20
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report. For additional details on our cash from operations, see the discussion below entitled “Cash from Operations.”
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments
decreased
by
$16.1 million
during fiscal 2018. There were several transactions or initiatives that occurred in fiscal 2018 that significantly impacted our cash, cash equivalents and indebtedness:
55
|
•
|
Term Loan Refinancing
. On September 28, 2018, we refinanced our existing 2022 Term Loan in the aggregate principal amount of $394.0 million, into a term loan with an aggregate principal amount of $700 million maturing on September 28, 2025 (the “2025 Term Loan”). This resulted in net proceeds of
$305.1 million
and debt issuance costs of
$1.9 million
.
|
|
•
|
Settlement Upon Conversion of 2018 Notes
. On October 15, 2018, both our 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (Original) (the “Original Notes”) and our 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (New) (the “New Notes”) matured. Following conversion elections by the holders thereof, the outstanding Original Notes were converted in advance of maturity on October 15, 2018 and we issued approximately 3.0 million shares of Ciena common stock in settlement of such conversion. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we elected to settle the conversion of the New Notes in a combination of cash and shares, provided that the cash portion would not exceed an aggregate amount of approximately
$400 million
. Upon conversion of the New Notes by the holders in advance of maturity, on October 15, 2018, we paid in cash an amount of
$288.7 million
representing the aggregate principal amount outstanding of the New Notes.
|
|
•
|
Stock Repurchase Program.
During fiscal 2018, we repurchased
$111.0 million
of our common stock under our stock repurchase program.
|
|
•
|
Acquisitions of Packet Design and DonRiver.
On July 2, 2018 we acquired Packet Design for
$40.4 million
, net of cash acquired, and on October 1, 2018, we acquired DonRiver for upfront cash consideration of
$42.3 million
, net of cash acquired, plus contingent consideration. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report for more information regarding the three-year earn-out arrangement in connection with the DonRiver acquisition.
|
|
•
|
Issuer Conversion of 2020 Notes
. On September 20, 2018, we elected to exercise an option to convert the $187.5 million principal amount of 2020 Notes outstanding into shares of Ciena common stock. On the October 31, 2018 conversion date, we issued approximately 9.2 million shares of common stock and paid cash of
$13.5 million
to satisfy an additional make-whole share obligation to the note holders.
|
See Notes
2
,
16
and
19
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report for information relating to these transactions.
The decrease in cash also reflects (i) cash used in investing activities for capital expenditures of
$67.6 million
; (ii) cash used from financing activities for capital lease obligations of
$3.6 million
; (iii) stock repurchased upon vesting of our stock units award to employees relating to tax withholding of
$4.8 million
; and (iv) payments on our term loan of
$4.0 million
. Proceeds from the issuance of equity under our employee stock purchase plans provided approximately
$23.1 million
and our settlement of certain foreign currency forward contracts provided
$9.4 million
in cash during the period.
The following table sets forth changes in our cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable debt securities (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
Increase
|
|||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
(decrease)
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
745,423
|
|
$
|
640,513
|
|
$
|
104,910
|
|
||
|
Short-term investments in marketable debt securities
|
148,981
|
|
279,133
|
|
(130,152
|
)
|
|||||
|
Long-term investments in marketable debt securities
|
58,970
|
|
49,783
|
|
9,187
|
|
|||||
|
Total cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable debt securities
|
$
|
953,374
|
|
$
|
969,429
|
|
$
|
(16,055
|
)
|
||
Principal Sources of Liquidity
. Our principal sources of liquidity on hand include our cash and investments, which as of
October 31, 2018
totaled
$953.4 million
, as well as our ABL credit facility. Ciena and certain of its subsidiaries are parties to a senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Credit Facility”) providing for a total commitment of $250 million with a maturity date of December 31, 2020. We principally use the ABL Credit Facility to support the issuance of letters of credit that arise in the ordinary course of our business and thereby to reduce our use of cash required to collateralize these instruments. As of
October 31, 2018
, letters of credit totaling $
61.7 million
were collateralized by our ABL Credit Facility. There were no borrowings outstanding under the ABL Credit Facility as of
October 31, 2018
.
Foreign Liquidity
. The amount of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments held by our foreign subsidiaries was
$67.8 million
as of
October 31, 2018
. We intend to reinvest indefinitely our foreign earnings. If we were to repatriate these accumulated historical foreign earnings, the provisional amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to foreign withholding taxes would be approximately
$23.0 million
. See Note
20
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
56
Settlement of Debt Conversion Liability.
On November 15, 2018, we paid
$111.3 million
and issued
1.6 million
shares in settlement of the remaining debt conversion liability related to the conversion of the
3.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (the “New Notes”).
Stock Repurchase Authorization.
On
December 13, 2018, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $500 million of our common stock. The amount and timing of repurchases are subject to a variety of factors including liquidity, cash flow, stock price and general business and market conditions. The program may be modified, suspended, or discontinued at any time. This program terminates and replaces in its entirety the previous stock repurchase program authorized in fiscal 2018.
Liquidity Position.
We regularly evaluate our liquidity position, debt obligations and anticipated cash needs to fund our operating or investment plans and may consider capital raising and other market opportunities that may be available to us. We regularly evaluate alternatives to manage our capital structure and reduce our debt and may continue to opportunistically pay down or refinance our outstanding debt. Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that cash from operations, cash, cash equivalents and investments and other sources of liquidity, including our ABL Credit Facility, will satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures and other liquidity requirements associated with our operations, through at least the next 12 months.
Cash from Operations
The following sections set forth the components of our
$229.3 million
of cash
provided by
operating activities for
fiscal 2018
:
Cash provided by net loss (adjusted for non-cash charges)
The following tables set forth (in thousands) our net loss adjusted for non-cash charges during fiscal
2018
:
|
|
Year ended
|
||
|
|
October 31, 2018
|
||
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(344,690
|
)
|
|
Adjustments for non-cash charges:
|
|
||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
10,039
|
|
|
|
Loss on fair value of debt conversion liability
|
12,070
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, and amortization of leasehold improvements
|
84,214
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation costs
|
52,972
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
25,806
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
463,631
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence
|
30,615
|
|
|
|
Provision for warranty
|
20,992
|
|
|
|
Other
|
21,685
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by net loss (adjusted for non-cash charges)
|
$
|
380,034
|
|
Working Capital
Our working capital used
$150.7 million
of cash during fiscal
2018
. The following tables set forth (in thousands) the major components of the reduction in working capital:
57
|
|
Year ended
|
||
|
|
October 31, 2018
|
||
|
Cash used in accounts receivable
|
$
|
(168,357
|
)
|
|
Cash used in inventories
|
(27,445
|
)
|
|
|
Cash used in prepaid expenses and other
|
(21,425
|
)
|
|
|
Cash provided by accounts payable, accruals and other obligations
|
85,798
|
|
|
|
Cash used in deferred revenue
|
(19,344
|
)
|
|
|
Cash used in working capital
|
$
|
(150,773
|
)
|
As compared to the end of fiscal
2017
:
|
•
|
The
$168.4 million
of cash
used in
accounts receivable during
fiscal 2018
reflects higher sales volume in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017;
|
|
•
|
The
$27.4 million
in cash
used in
inventory during
fiscal 2018
primarily reflects increases in finished goods to meet customer delivery schedules;
|
|
•
|
Cash
used in
prepaid expenses and other during
fiscal 2018
was
$21.4 million
, primarily reflects increased government grant receivables and other non-customer receivables partially offset by lower prepaid value added taxes and lower deferred deployment costs;
|
|
•
|
The
$85.8 million
of cash
provided by
accounts payable, accruals and other obligations during fiscal
2018
reflects increased inventory purchases at the end of fiscal 2018; and
|
|
•
|
The
$19.3 million
of cash
used in
deferred revenue represents a decrease in advanced payments received from customers prior to revenue recognition.
|
Our days sales outstanding (DSOs) were
92
days for
fiscal 2018
as compared to
80
days for
fiscal 2017
. Our inventory turns
increased
from
4.9
turns during
fiscal 2017
to
5.7
turns during
fiscal 2018
.
Cash paid for interest
The following tables set forth (in thousands) our interest paid during
fiscal 2018
:
|
|
Year ended
|
||
|
October 31, 2018
|
|||
|
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes, due October 15, 2018 (New)
(1)
|
$
|
10,827
|
|
|
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes, due October 15, 2018 (Original)
(1)
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
4.0% Convertible Senior Notes, due December 15, 2020
(2)
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
Term Loan due January 30, 2022
(3)
|
15,594
|
|
|
|
Term Loan due September 28, 2025
(4)
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
(5)
|
94
|
|
|
|
ABL Credit Facility
(6)
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
4,957
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
44,750
|
|
|
(1)
|
The final interest payment owing on both issues of our 2018 Notes was paid during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018.
|
|
(2)
|
The final interest payment on our 2020 Notes was paid during the third quarter of fiscal 2018.
|
|
(3)
|
Interest on the 2022 Term Loan was payable periodically based on the interest period selected for borrowing. The 2022 Term Loan bore interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 2.50% subject to a minimum LIBOR rate of 0.75%. On September 28, 2018, we refinanced and replaced this term loan with the 2025 Term Loan. See Note
16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this report for more information.
|
|
(4)
|
Interest on the 2025 Term Loan is payable periodically based on the interest period selected for borrowing. The 2025 Term Loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 2.00% subject to a minimum LIBOR rate of 0.00%. As of the end of fiscal 2018, the interest rate on the 2025 Term Loan was 4.28%
.
|
58
|
(5)
|
We entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swap in a total amount of $350 million on October 1, 2018 that fixed the LIBOR rate of approximately
50%
of the principal amount of the 2025 Term Loan at 2.957% through September 2023.
|
|
(6)
|
During
fiscal 2018
, we utilized the ABL Credit Facility to collateralize certain standby letters of credit and paid
$1.5 million
in commitment fees, interest expense and other administrative charges relating to our ABL Credit Facility.
|
For additional information about our convertible notes, term loans (including the refinancing of our 2022 Term Loan into the 2025 Term Loan), ABL Credit Facility and interest rate swaps see Notes
14
,
16
and
17
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report and Item 7A of Part II of this annual report.
Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of
October 31, 2018
(in thousands):
|
Total
|
Less than one
year
|
One to three
years
|
Three to five
years
|
Thereafter
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Principal due on Term Loan due September 28, 2025
(1)
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
$
|
665,000
|
|
||||
|
Interest due on Term Loan due September 28, 2025
(1)
|
203,797
|
|
30,187
|
|
59,630
|
|
58,414
|
|
55,566
|
|
|||||||||
|
Payments due under interest rate swaps
(1)
|
11,814
|
|
2,397
|
|
4,807
|
|
4,610
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Operating leases
(2)
|
150,608
|
|
28,912
|
|
45,668
|
|
28,981
|
|
47,047
|
|
|||||||||
|
Purchase obligations
(3)
|
379,096
|
|
379,096
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Capital leases - equipment
|
1,419
|
|
1,281
|
|
138
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Capital leases - buildings
(4)
|
113,862
|
|
7,373
|
|
15,104
|
|
15,974
|
|
75,411
|
|
|||||||||
|
Payment due on debt conversion - cash settlement
(5)
|
111,268
|
|
111,268
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Payment due on debt conversion - equity settlement
(5)
|
52,944
|
|
52,944
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other obligations
|
830
|
|
796
|
|
34
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
(6)
|
$
|
1,725,638
|
|
$
|
621,254
|
|
$
|
139,381
|
|
$
|
121,979
|
|
$
|
843,024
|
|
||||
_________________________________
|
(1)
|
Interest on the 2025 Term Loan and payments due under the interest rate swaps is variable and calculated using the rate in effect on the balance sheet date. For additional information about our term loans and the interest rate swaps, see Notes
14
and
16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report and Item 7A of Part II of this annual report.
|
|
(2)
|
Does not include variable insurance, taxes, maintenance and other costs that may be required by the applicable operating lease. These costs are not expected to have a material future impact.
|
|
(3)
|
Purchase obligations relate to purchase order commitments to our contract manufacturers and component suppliers for inventory. In certain instances, we are permitted to cancel, reschedule or adjust these orders. Consequently, only a portion of the amount reported above relates to firm, non-cancelable and unconditional obligations.
|
|
(4)
|
This represents the total minimum lease payments due for all buildings that are subject to capital lease accounting. Does not include variable insurance, taxes, maintenance and other costs required by the applicable capital lease. These costs are not expected to have a material future impact.
|
|
(5)
|
This represents the fair value of the total obligation for the cash and equity portion of the conversion feature incurred in conjunction with the November 15, 2018 settlement of the New 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes. See Notes
14
and
16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report
|
|
(6)
|
As of
October 31, 2018
, we also had
$15.9 million
of other long-term obligations on our Consolidated Balance Sheet for unrecognized tax positions that are not included in this table because the timing or amount of any cash settlement with the respective tax authority cannot be reasonably estimated.
|
Some of our commercial commitments, including some of the future minimum payments in operating leases set forth above and certain commitments to customers, are secured by standby letters of credit collateralized under our ABL Credit Facility or restricted cash. Restricted cash balances are included in other current assets or other long-term assets depending upon the duration of the underlying letter of credit obligation. The following is a summary of our commercial commitments secured by standby letters of credit by commitment expiration date as of
October 31, 2018
(in thousands):
59
|
Total
|
Less than one
year
|
One to
three years
|
Three to
five years
|
Thereafter
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Standby letters of credit
|
$
|
61,726
|
|
$
|
19,171
|
|
$
|
24,564
|
|
$
|
12,221
|
|
$
|
5,770
|
|
||||
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In particular, we do not have any equity interests in so-called limited purpose entities, which include special purpose entities (SPEs) and structured finance entities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. By their nature, these estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an ongoing basis, we reevaluate our estimates, including those related to share-based compensation, bad debts, inventories, intangible and other long-lived assets, goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, derivatives and hedging, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Among other things, these estimates form the basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. To the extent that there are material differences between our estimates and actual results, our consolidated financial statements will be affected.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect those areas where significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Customer purchase agreements and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and evidence of customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery or services rendered. We assess whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. We assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history. Revenue for maintenance services is deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be performed. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in revenue, with the associated expenses included in product cost of goods sold.
Software revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. In instances where final acceptance criteria of the software are specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
We limit the amount of revenue recognition for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products or services, future performance obligations or subject to customer-specified return or refund privileges.
Revenue for multiple element arrangements is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative selling price of each delivered element, with revenue recognized for each delivered element when the revenue recognition criteria are met. We determine the selling price for each deliverable based upon the selling price hierarchy for multiple-deliverable arrangements. Under this hierarchy, we use vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of selling price, if it exists, or third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exists for a deliverable, we use our best estimate of selling price ("BESP") for that deliverable. For multiple element software arrangements where VSOE of undelivered maintenance does not exist, revenue for the entire arrangement is recognized over the maintenance term.
VSOE, when determinable, is established based on our pricing and discounting practices for the specific product or service when sold separately. In determining whether VSOE exists, we require that a substantial majority of the selling prices for a product or service fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range. We have generally been unable to establish TPE of selling price because our go-to-market strategy differs from that of others in our markets, and the extent of customization and differentiated features and functions varies among comparable products or services from our peers. We determine BESP based
60
upon management-approved pricing guidelines, which consider multiple factors including the type of product or service, gross margin objectives, competitive and market conditions and the go-to-market strategy, all of which can affect pricing practices.
Our total deferred revenue for products was
$42.5 million
and
$49.1 million
as of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
, respectively. Our services revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be performed. Our total deferred revenue for services was
$127.0 million
and
$135.9 million
as of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
, respectively.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
, a new accounting standard related to revenue recognition. ASC 606 supersedes nearly all U.S. GAAP on revenue recognition and eliminated industry-specific guidance. The underlying principle of ASC 606 is to recognize revenue when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services at an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. It also requires increased disclosures including the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows related to contracts with customers.
For multiple element software arrangements where vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of undelivered maintenance does not exist, we currently recognize revenue for the entire arrangement over the maintenance term. The adoption of ASC 606 will require us to determine the stand alone selling price for each of the software and software-related deliverables at contract inception, and we consequently note that certain software deliverables will be recognized at a point in time rather than over a period of time.
We also note that certain installation and deployment, and consulting and network design services, will be recognized over a period of time rather than at a point in time.
We have considered the impact of the guidance in ASC 340-40,
Other Assets and Deferred Costs; Contracts with Customers
, and the interpretations of the FASB Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition (TRG) with respect to capitalization and amortization of incremental costs of obtaining a contract. In conjunction with this interpretation, we have elected to implement the practical expedient allowing for incremental costs to be recognized as an expense when incurred if the period of the asset recognition is one year or less, and amortized over the period of performance, if the period of the asset recognition is greater than one year.
We elected to implement ASC 606
using the modified retrospective approach whereby the cumulative effect at adoption will be presented as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit. The comparative information will not be restated and will continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. ASC 606 will be effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
We do not expect that ASC 606 will have a material impact on total revenue for fiscal 2019 as we believe the revenue that will be accelerated from certain software arrangements consistent with the changes in timing as described above will be largely offset by a reduction of revenue from software arrangements where revenue was previously deferred in prior periods and recognized ratably over time as required under the current standard. This preliminary assessment is based on the types and number of revenue arrangements currently in place. The exact impact of ASC 606 will be dependent on the facts and circumstances at adoption and could vary from quarter to quarter. For further discussion of ASC 606, see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
Business Combinations
We record acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting. All of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies and contingent consideration are recognized at their fair value as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net tangible and net intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. The application of the purchase method of accounting for business combinations requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions in the determination of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in order to allocate purchase price consideration properly between assets that are depreciated and amortized from goodwill. These assumptions and estimates include a market participant’s use of the asset and the appropriate discount rates for a market participant. Our estimates are based on historical experience, information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and, when appropriate, include assistance from independent third-party appraisal firms. Our significant assumptions and estimates can include, but are not limited to, the cash flows that an asset is expected to generate in the future, the appropriate weighted-average cost of capital, and the cost savings expected to be derived from acquiring an asset. These estimates are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. In addition, unanticipated events and circumstances may occur which may affect the accuracy or validity of such estimates. During fiscal 2016, we completed the acquisition of TeraXion’s HSPC assets for a purchase price of
$32.0 million
.
61
During fiscal 2018, we completed the Packet Design acquisition for a purchase price of
$41.1 million
and the DonRiver acquisition for a purchase price of
$54.2 million
, including a contingent consideration component. See Note
2
to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for more information regarding these transactions and the three-year earn-out arrangement in connection with the DonRiver acquisition.
Share-Based Compensation
We estimate the fair value of our restricted stock unit awards based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. Our outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. We recognize the estimated fair value of service-based awards as share-based expense ratably over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Awards with performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain financial or other performance criteria or targets as a condition to the vesting, or acceleration of vesting. We recognize the estimated fair value of performance-based awards as share-based expense over the performance period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, based upon our determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At the end of each reporting period, we reassess the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets, and the expense is adjusted accordingly. Determining whether the performance targets will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of expense may be revised periodically based on changes in the probability of achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized against that goal and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation cost is reversed.
Share-based compensation expense is taken into account based on awards granted. In the event of a forfeiture of an award, the expense related to the unvested portion of that award is reversed. Reversal of share-based compensation expense based on forfeitures can materially affect the measurement of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. See Note
21
to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for information regarding our assumptions related to share-based compensation and the amount of share-based compensation expense we incurred for the periods covered in this report. As of
October 31, 2018
, total unrecognized compensation expense was
$77.3 million
, which relates to unvested restricted stock units and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.45
years.
Ciena is required to record excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies related to stock-based compensation as income tax benefit or expense when share-based awards vest or are settled.
Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence
We make estimates about future customer demand for our products when establishing the appropriate reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. We write down inventory that has become obsolete or unmarketable by an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Inventory write downs are a component of our product cost of goods sold. Upon recognition of the write down, a new lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. In an effort to limit our exposure to delivery delays and to satisfy customer needs, we purchase inventory based on forecasted sales across our product lines. In addition, part of our research and development strategy is to promote the convergence of similar features and functionalities across our product lines. Each of these practices exposes us to the risk that our customers will not order products for which we have forecasted sales, or will purchase less than we have forecasted.
We have experienced write downs due to changes in our strategic direction, discontinuance of a product or introduction of newer versions of our products, declines in the sales of or forecasted demand for certain products, and general market conditions. We recorded charges for excess and obsolete inventory of
$30.6 million
,
$35.5 million
and
$33.7 million
in
fiscal 2018
,
2017
and
2016
, respectively. Our inventory net of allowance for excess and obsolescence was
$262.8 million
and
$267.1 million
as of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
, respectively.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
Our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on management’s assessment, on a specific identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and generally have not required collateral or other forms of security from customers. In determining the appropriate balance for our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to determine collectibility. In doing so, we consider creditworthiness, payment history, account activity and communication with such customer. If a customer’s financial condition changes, or if actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, we may be
62
required to take a charge for an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.
During fiscal 2017, Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts included a provision for a significant asset impairment of
$13.7 million
for a trade receivable related to a single customer in the APAC region. Our accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, was
$786.5 million
and
$622.2 million
as of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
, respectively. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was
$17.4 million
and
$17.6 million
as of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
, respectively.
Goodwill
Our goodwill was generated from the acquisition of (i) Cyan during fiscal 2015, (ii) the HSPC assets of TeraXion during fiscal 2016, (iii) Packet Design on July 2, 2018, and (iv) DonRiver on October 1, 2018. The goodwill from these acquisitions is primarily related to expected synergies. Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair values assigned to the net assets acquired in a business combination. We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which we have determined to be the last business day of fiscal September each year. We also test goodwill for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value.
The first step in the process of assessing goodwill impairment is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with the unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test indicates that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step two requires goodwill impairments to be measured on the basis of the fair value of the reporting unit relative to the reporting unit’s carrying amount. A non-cash goodwill impairment charge would have the effect of decreasing earnings or increasing losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial impairment charge, our operating results would be materially adversely affected in such period. As of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
, the goodwill balance was
$298.0 million
and
$267.5 million
, respectively. There were no goodwill impairments resulting from our fiscal
2018
and
2017
impairment tests and no reporting unit was determined to be at risk of failing step one of the goodwill impairment test. See Note
2
to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
Long-lived Assets
Our long-lived assets include equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, finite-lived intangible assets, in-process research and development, and maintenance spares. As of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
these assets totaled
$486.0 million
and
$456.3 million
, net, respectively. We test long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying amount is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. Our long-lived assets are assigned to asset groups which represent the lowest level for which we identify cash flows. We measure impairment loss as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.
Deferred Tax Assets
Pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, Income Taxes, we maintain a valuation allowance for a deferred tax asset when it is deemed to be more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income (including the reversals of deferred tax liabilities) during the periods in which those deferred tax assets will become deductible. In evaluating whether a valuation allowance is required under such rules, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including prior operating results, the nature and reason for any losses, our forecast of future taxable income, utilization of tax planning strategies, and the dates on which any deferred tax assets are expected to expire. These assumptions and estimates require a significant amount of judgment and are made based on current and projected circumstances and conditions.
Quarterly, we perform an analysis to determine the likelihood of realizing our deferred tax assets and whether sufficient evidence exists to support reversal of all or a portion of the valuation allowance. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, this analysis consisted of the evaluation of all available positive and negative evidence, including our improved profitability in fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017. We also considered third-party estimates of market growth and our internal projections of future profitability as indicated in our annual update to our operating plan for fiscal 2018 and our long-term strategic forecast which were completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. We also considered our strong performance against our annual operating plans in recent years and our ability to utilize tax planning strategies. Based on this analysis, we concluded that it was more likely than not that the majority of our U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized, and we therefore reversed most of the valuation allowance against those deferred assets. This reversal resulted in a one-time, non-cash income tax benefit of $1.2 billion and a $26.0 million adjustment to additional paid-in capital. The valuation allowance balance at October 31, 2018 was
63
$142.7 million and the corresponding net deferred tax asset was $745.0 million. We will continue to evaluate future financial performance to determine whether such performance is both sustained and significant enough to provide sufficient evidence to support reversal of all or a portion of the remaining valuation allowance. The value of our net deferred tax asset may be subject to change in the future, depending upon our generation or projections of future taxable income, as well as changes in tax policy or our tax planning strategy. For further discussion, see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
Warranty
Our liability for product warranties, included in other accrued liabilities, was
$44.7 million
and
$42.5 million
as of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
, respectively. Our products are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from one to five years. We accrue for warranty costs as part of our cost of goods sold based on associated material costs, technical support labor costs and associated overhead. Material cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends in the volume of product returns within the warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the equipment. Technical support labor cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends and the cost to support the customer cases within the warranty period. The provision for product warranties, net of adjustments for previous years’ provisions, was
$21.0 million
,
$8.0 million
and
$15.5 million
for fiscal
2018
,
2017
and
2016
respectively. The provision for warranty claims may fluctuate on a quarterly basis depending upon the mix of products and customers in that period. If actual product failure rates, material replacement costs, service or labor costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty provision would be required. These adjustments for previous years provisions had the effect of reducing warranty provisions by
$9.7 million
and
$5.3 million
for fiscal
2017
and
2016
respectively. During
fiscal 2018
, we determined that failure rates for prior estimates remained unchanged, and accordingly did not make any adjustments for previous fiscal year provisions not yet settled. As a result, our warranty provision for
fiscal 2018
increased as compared to these prior years. See Note
13
to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report. An increase in warranty claims or the related costs associated with satisfying our warranty obligations could increase our cost of sales and negatively affect our gross margin.
Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note
1
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for information relating to our discussion of the effects of recent accounting pronouncements.
Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations
The tables below (in thousands, except per share data) set forth the operating results in our consolidated statements of operations for each of the eight quarters in the period ended
October 31, 2018
. Our revenue can fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of a number of factors, including changes in customer spending levels or networking strategies, order timing and volume, backlog levels, timing of revenue recognition and other competitive dynamics. As our business has evolved, including the sales of our solutions to meet the “on-demand” service requirements of both our customers and their end-users, the amount of quarterly revenue that we recognize in a quarter from customer orders received in that same quarter (which we refer to as “book to revenue”) has increased as compared to our historical periods. Increased reliance on book to revenue introduces a number of risks, including the inherent difficulty in forecasting the amount and timing of book to revenue in any given quarter, and may increase the likelihood of fluctuations in our results. This information is unaudited, but in our opinion reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that we consider necessary for a fair statement of such information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.
64
|
Oct. 31,
|
Jul. 31,
|
Apr. 30,
|
Jan. 31,
|
Oct. 31,
|
Jul. 31,
|
Apr. 30,
|
Jan. 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
2018
|
2018
|
2018
|
2017
|
2017
|
2017
|
2017
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Products
|
$
|
743,867
|
|
$
|
691,758
|
|
$
|
604,226
|
|
$
|
525,609
|
|
$
|
616,216
|
|
$
|
610,742
|
|
$
|
584,630
|
|
$
|
506,993
|
|
|||||||
|
Services
|
155,489
|
|
127,059
|
|
125,752
|
|
120,526
|
|
128,233
|
|
117,977
|
|
122,392
|
|
114,504
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
899,356
|
|
818,817
|
|
729,978
|
|
646,135
|
|
744,449
|
|
728,719
|
|
707,022
|
|
621,497
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Cost of goods sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Products
|
421,583
|
|
399,886
|
|
372,568
|
|
313,120
|
|
352,992
|
|
341,197
|
|
327,295
|
|
286,811
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Services
|
79,698
|
|
67,388
|
|
64,103
|
|
61,250
|
|
65,772
|
|
59,446
|
|
61,487
|
|
60,901
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total costs of goods sold
|
501,281
|
|
467,274
|
|
436,671
|
|
374,370
|
|
418,764
|
|
400,643
|
|
388,782
|
|
347,712
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
398,075
|
|
351,543
|
|
293,307
|
|
271,765
|
|
325,685
|
|
328,076
|
|
318,240
|
|
273,785
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Research and development
|
134,983
|
|
121,133
|
|
116,924
|
|
118,524
|
|
119,108
|
|
117,729
|
|
121,623
|
|
116,869
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Selling and marketing
|
112,791
|
|
95,395
|
|
97,359
|
|
88,515
|
|
95,877
|
|
86,739
|
|
88,551
|
|
85,002
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative
|
44,539
|
|
38,212
|
|
38,976
|
|
38,406
|
|
36,181
|
|
35,569
|
|
34,990
|
|
35,864
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
4,654
|
|
3,837
|
|
3,623
|
|
3,623
|
|
3,661
|
|
3,837
|
|
10,980
|
|
14,551
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Acquisition and integration costs
|
3,778
|
|
1,333
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Significant asset impairments and restructuring costs
|
1,460
|
|
6,359
|
|
4,359
|
|
5,961
|
|
15,059
|
|
2,203
|
|
4,276
|
|
2,395
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
302,205
|
|
266,269
|
|
261,241
|
|
255,029
|
|
269,886
|
|
246,077
|
|
260,420
|
|
254,681
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
95,870
|
|
85,274
|
|
32,066
|
|
16,736
|
|
55,799
|
|
81,999
|
|
57,820
|
|
19,104
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Interest and other income (loss), net
|
(13,357
|
)
|
(1,543
|
)
|
1,296
|
|
1,575
|
|
1,344
|
|
(848
|
)
|
6
|
|
411
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(14,873
|
)
|
(13,611
|
)
|
(13,031
|
)
|
(13,734
|
)
|
(13,926
|
)
|
(13,415
|
)
|
(13,308
|
)
|
(15,203
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
|
(13,887
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(692
|
)
|
—
|
|
(2,924
|
)
|
(41
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
53,753
|
|
70,120
|
|
20,331
|
|
4,577
|
|
42,525
|
|
67,736
|
|
41,594
|
|
4,271
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Provision (benefit) for income tax
|
(10,224
|
)
|
19,280
|
|
6,475
|
|
477,940
|
|
(1,117,531
|
)
|
7,726
|
|
3,568
|
|
410
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
63,977
|
|
$
|
50,840
|
|
$
|
13,856
|
|
$
|
(473,363
|
)
|
$
|
1,160,056
|
|
$
|
60,010
|
|
$
|
38,026
|
|
$
|
3,861
|
|
|||||||
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
$
|
(3.29
|
)
|
$
|
8.11
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|||||||
|
Diluted net income (loss) per potential common share
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
$
|
(3.29
|
)
|
$
|
7.32
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|||||||
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
143,659
|
|
143,400
|
|
143,975
|
|
143,922
|
|
143,097
|
|
142,464
|
|
141,743
|
|
140,682
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average diluted potential common shares outstanding
|
157,745
|
|
159,998
|
|
147,973
|
|
143,922
|
|
158,791
|
|
172,112
|
|
165,273
|
|
142,184
|
|
|||||||||||||||
65
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The following discussion about these market risks includes forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
.
We currently hold investments in U.S. government obligations and commercial paper with varying maturities. See Notes
5
and
6
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for information relating to investments and fair value. These investments are sensitive to interest rate movements, and their fair value will decline as interest rates rise and increase as interest rates decline. The estimated impact on these investments of a 100 basis point (1.0%) increase in interest rates across the yield curve from rates in effect as of the balance sheet date would be a
$1.4 million
decline in value.
Our earnings and cash flows from operations would be exposed to changes in interest rates because of the floating rate of interest in our 2025 Term Loan if such loan was not hedged using floating-to-fixed rate interest rate swaps. See Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report. The 2025 Term Loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 2.00%, subject to a minimum LIBOR rate of 0.00%. We have entered into interest rate swap arrangements ("interest rate swaps") that fix the LIBOR rate of approximately 50% of the 2025 Term Loan principal amount at 2.957% through September 2023. As such, a 100 basis point (1.0%) increase in the LIBOR rate as of our most recent LIBOR rate setting would increase our annualized interest expense by approximately $3.5 million on our 2025 Term Loan as recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note
16
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report for information relating to our 2025 Term Loan.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk.
As a global concern, our business and results of operations are exposed to and can be impacted by movements in foreign currency exchange rates. For example, the announcement of the United Kingdom (UK) referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (EU), commonly referred to as "Brexit," has previously caused, and may continue to cause, significant volatility in currency exchange rate fluctuations. Because we sell globally, some of our sales transactions and revenue are non-U.S. Dollar denominated, with the Canadian Dollar, Euro, British Pound and Brazilian Real being our most significant foreign currency revenue exposures. If the U.S. Dollar strengthens against these currencies, our revenue for these transactions reported in U.S. Dollars would decline. For our U.S. Dollar denominated sales, an increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar would increase the real costs of our products to customers in markets outside the United States, which could impact our competitive position. During fiscal
2018
, approximately
17.8%
of revenue was non-U.S. Dollar denominated. During fiscal
2018
as compared to fiscal
2017
, the U.S. Dollar strengthened against a number of foreign currencies, including the Brazilian Real and Argentine Peso primarily offset by weakening against the Euro. Consequently, our revenue reported in U.S. Dollars was minimally impacted by approximately
$1.5 million
or
0.1%
. As it relates to costs of goods sold, employee-related and facilities costs associated with certain manufacturing-related operations in Canada represent our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange risk.
With regard to operating expense, our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange risk relates to the Canadian Dollar, British Pound, Euro, Indian Rupee, Brazilian Real and Australian Dollar. During fiscal
2018
, approximately
52.6%
of our operating expense was non-U.S. Dollar denominated. If currencies strengthen against the U.S. Dollar, costs reported in U.S. Dollars will increase. During fiscal
2018
, research and development expense
was adversely affected by
approximately
$5.1 million
, net of hedging, primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. Dollar in relation to the Canadian Dollar in comparison to fiscal
2017
. Also, sales and marketing expense
was adversely affected by
$4.3 million
, as a result of foreign exchange rates, primarily due to a weaker U.S. Dollar in relation to the Euro in fiscal 2018 in comparison to fiscal 2017.
From time to time, we use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce variability in certain forecasted non-U.S. Dollar denominated cash flows. Generally, these derivatives have maturities of 24 months or less and are designated as cash flow hedges. At the inception of the cash flow hedge, and on an ongoing basis, we assess whether the forward contract has been effective in offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the hedged risk during the hedging period. The effective portion of the derivative’s net gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and, upon the occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified to the line item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations to which the hedged transaction relates. Any net gain or loss associated with the ineffectiveness of the hedging instrument is reported in interest and other income (loss), net.
Ciena Corporation, as the U.S. parent entity, uses the U.S. Dollar as its functional currency. However, some of our foreign branch offices and subsidiaries use the local currency as their functional currency. During
fiscal 2018
, we recorded
$19.4 million
in foreign currency exchange losses, as a result of monetary assets and liabilities that were transacted in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, and the re-measurement adjustments were recorded in interest and other income (loss), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. From time to time, we use foreign currency forwards to hedge these balance sheet exposures. These forwards are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and any net gain or loss associated with these derivatives is reported in interest and other income (loss), net. During fiscal
2018
, we recorded gains of
66
$6.8 million
from these derivatives. See Notes
1
,
4
and
14
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
67
The following is an index to the consolidated financial statements:
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Number
|
68
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ciena Corporation:
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ciena Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of October 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).
We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2018, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework
(2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of October 31, 2018 and 2017,
and the results of its
operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2018
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2018, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework
(2013)
issued by the COSO.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for share-based compensation in 2018.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated
financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
69
company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
December 21, 2018
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1992.
70
CIENA CORPORATION
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
ASSETS
|
|
||||||
|
Current assets:
|
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
745,423
|
|
$
|
640,513
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
148,981
|
|
279,133
|
|
|||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
786,502
|
|
622,183
|
|
|||
|
Inventories, net
|
262,751
|
|
267,143
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
198,945
|
|
197,339
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
2,142,602
|
|
2,006,311
|
|
|||
|
Long-term investments
|
58,970
|
|
49,783
|
|
|||
|
Equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, net
|
292,067
|
|
308,465
|
|
|||
|
Goodwill
|
297,968
|
|
267,458
|
|
|||
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
148,225
|
|
100,997
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
745,039
|
|
1,155,104
|
|
|||
|
Other long-term assets
|
71,652
|
|
63,593
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,756,523
|
|
$
|
3,951,711
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
340,582
|
|
$
|
260,098
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other short-term obligations
|
340,075
|
|
322,934
|
|
|||
|
Deferred revenue
|
111,134
|
|
102,418
|
|
|||
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
7,000
|
|
352,293
|
|
|||
|
Debt conversion liability
|
164,212
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
963,003
|
|
1,037,743
|
|
|||
|
Long-term deferred revenue
|
58,323
|
|
82,589
|
|
|||
|
Other long-term obligations
|
119,413
|
|
111,349
|
|
|||
|
Long-term debt, net
|
686,450
|
|
583,688
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
1,827,189
|
|
$
|
1,815,369
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 24)
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
||||||
|
Preferred stock — par value $0.01; 20,000,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and outstanding
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Common stock — par value $0.01; 290,000,000 shares authorized; 154,318,531 and 143,043,227 shares issued and outstanding
|
1,543
|
|
1,430
|
|
|||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
6,881,223
|
|
6,810,182
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(5,780
|
)
|
(11,017
|
)
|
|||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(4,947,652
|
)
|
(4,664,253
|
)
|
|||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
1,929,334
|
|
2,136,342
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
3,756,523
|
|
$
|
3,951,711
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
71
CIENA CORPORATION
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Products
|
$
|
2,565,460
|
|
$
|
2,318,581
|
|
$
|
2,117,472
|
|
||
|
Services
|
528,826
|
|
483,106
|
|
483,101
|
|
|||||
|
Total revenue
|
3,094,286
|
|
2,801,687
|
|
2,600,573
|
|
|||||
|
Cost of goods sold:
|
|
||||||||||
|
Products
|
1,507,157
|
|
1,308,295
|
|
1,176,304
|
|
|||||
|
Services
|
272,439
|
|
247,606
|
|
262,693
|
|
|||||
|
Total cost of goods sold
|
1,779,596
|
|
1,555,901
|
|
1,438,997
|
|
|||||
|
Gross profit
|
1,314,690
|
|
1,245,786
|
|
1,161,576
|
|
|||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
||||||||||
|
Research and development
|
491,564
|
|
475,329
|
|
451,794
|
|
|||||
|
Selling and marketing
|
394,060
|
|
356,169
|
|
349,731
|
|
|||||
|
General and administrative
|
160,133
|
|
142,604
|
|
132,828
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
15,737
|
|
33,029
|
|
61,508
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition and integration costs
|
5,111
|
|
—
|
|
4,613
|
|
|||||
|
Significant asset impairments and restructuring costs
|
18,139
|
|
23,933
|
|
4,933
|
|
|||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
1,084,744
|
|
1,031,064
|
|
1,005,407
|
|
|||||
|
Income from operations
|
229,946
|
|
214,722
|
|
156,169
|
|
|||||
|
Interest and other income (loss), net
|
(12,029
|
)
|
913
|
|
(12,569
|
)
|
|||||
|
Interest expense
|
(55,249
|
)
|
(55,852
|
)
|
(56,656
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
|
(13,887
|
)
|
(3,657
|
)
|
(226
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
148,781
|
|
156,126
|
|
86,718
|
|
|||||
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
493,471
|
|
(1,105,827
|
)
|
14,134
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(344,690
|
)
|
$
|
1,261,953
|
|
$
|
72,584
|
|
||
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
$
|
(2.40
|
)
|
$
|
8.89
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
||
|
Diluted net income (loss) per potential common share
|
$
|
(2.49
|
)
|
$
|
7.53
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
||
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
143,738
|
|
141,997
|
|
138,312
|
|
|||||
|
Weighted average diluted potential common shares outstanding
|
143,738
|
|
169,919
|
|
150,704
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
72
CIENA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
|
|
Year ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(344,690
|
)
|
$
|
1,261,953
|
|
$
|
72,584
|
|
||
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
|
26
|
|
(590
|
)
|
217
|
|
|||||
|
Change in unrealized loss on foreign currency forward contracts, net of tax
|
(1,674
|
)
|
(295
|
)
|
(823
|
)
|
|||||
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on forward starting interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
6,199
|
|
6,185
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|||||
|
Change in accumulated translation adjustments
|
686
|
|
8,012
|
|
(1,152
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
5,237
|
|
13,312
|
|
(2,203
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
(339,453
|
)
|
$
|
1,275,265
|
|
$
|
70,381
|
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
73
CIENA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
Common Stock
Shares
|
Par Value
|
Additional
Paid-in-Capital
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2015
|
135,612,217
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
$
|
6,640,436
|
|
$
|
(22,126
|
)
|
$
|
(5,998,790
|
)
|
$
|
620,876
|
|
||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
72,584
|
|
72,584
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2,203
|
)
|
—
|
|
(2,203
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Issuance of shares from employee equity plans
|
4,155,410
|
|
42
|
|
23,049
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
23,091
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
51,993
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
51,993
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2016
|
139,767,627
|
|
1,398
|
|
6,715,478
|
|
(24,329
|
)
|
(5,926,206
|
)
|
766,341
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,261,953
|
|
1,261,953
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
13,312
|
|
—
|
|
13,312
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Issuance of shares from employee equity plans
|
3,275,600
|
|
32
|
|
20,380
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20,412
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
48,360
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
48,360
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Reversal of deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
25,964
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
25,964
|
|
25,964
|
|
|||||||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2017
|
143,043,227
|
|
1,430
|
|
6,810,182
|
|
(11,017
|
)
|
(4,664,253
|
)
|
2,136,342
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(344,690
|
)
|
(344,690
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,237
|
|
—
|
|
5,237
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Reclassification of cash conversion feature
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(152,142
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(152,142
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Conversion of convertible notes into common shares
|
12,236,146
|
|
122
|
|
261,981
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
262,103
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Repurchases of common stock - repurchase program
|
(4,290,801
|
)
|
(44
|
)
|
(110,937
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(110,981
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Issuance of shares from employee equity plans
|
3,484,018
|
|
37
|
|
23,090
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
23,127
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
52,972
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
52,972
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted stock units
|
(154,059
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(4,755
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4,757
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Effect of adoption of new accounting standard
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
832
|
|
—
|
|
61,291
|
|
|
|
62,123
|
|
|||||||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2018
|
154,318,531
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
$
|
6,881,223
|
|
$
|
(5,780
|
)
|
$
|
(4,947,652
|
)
|
$
|
1,929,334
|
|
||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
74
CIENA CORPORATION
(in thousands)
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(344,690
|
)
|
$
|
1,261,953
|
|
$
|
72,584
|
|
||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
||||||||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
10,039
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Loss on fair value of debt conversion liability
|
12,070
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation of equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, and amortization of leasehold improvements
|
84,214
|
|
77,189
|
|
63,394
|
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation costs
|
52,972
|
|
48,360
|
|
51,993
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
25,806
|
|
45,713
|
|
78,298
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred taxes
|
463,631
|
|
(1,126,732
|
)
|
(1,116
|
)
|
|||||
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
2,700
|
|
18,221
|
|
1,701
|
|
|||||
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence
|
30,615
|
|
35,459
|
|
33,713
|
|
|||||
|
Provision for warranty
|
20,992
|
|
7,965
|
|
15,483
|
|
|||||
|
Other
|
21,685
|
|
22,417
|
|
24,929
|
|
|||||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
(168,357
|
)
|
(66,123
|
)
|
(26,074
|
)
|
|||||
|
Inventories
|
(27,445
|
)
|
(91,567
|
)
|
(53,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
(21,425
|
)
|
(33,834
|
)
|
30,047
|
|
|||||
|
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations
|
85,798
|
|
33,897
|
|
7,153
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred revenue
|
(19,344
|
)
|
1,964
|
|
(9,585
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
229,261
|
|
234,882
|
|
289,520
|
|
|||||
|
Cash flows used in investing activities:
|
|
||||||||||
|
Payments for equipment, furniture, fixtures and intellectual property
|
(67,616
|
)
|
(94,600
|
)
|
(107,185
|
)
|
|||||
|
Restricted cash
|
117
|
|
(54
|
)
|
11
|
|
|||||
|
Purchase of available for sale securities
|
(286,824
|
)
|
(299,038
|
)
|
(365,191
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities
|
410,109
|
|
335,075
|
|
230,612
|
|
|||||
|
Purchase of cost method investment
|
(1,767
|
)
|
—
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Settlement of foreign currency forward contracts, net
|
9,385
|
|
(2,810
|
)
|
(18,506
|
)
|
|||||
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
(82,670
|
)
|
—
|
|
(32,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(19,266
|
)
|
(61,427
|
)
|
(296,259
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
||||||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net
|
305,125
|
|
—
|
|
248,750
|
|
|||||
|
Payment of long-term debt
|
(292,730
|
)
|
(233,554
|
)
|
(266,116
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payment for make-whole provision upon conversion of long-term debt
|
(13,453
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Payment for modification of term loans
|
—
|
|
(93,625
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
(1,936
|
)
|
(722
|
)
|
(3,987
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payment of capital lease obligations
|
(3,624
|
)
|
(3,562
|
)
|
(5,966
|
)
|
|||||
|
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted stock units
|
(4,757
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Repurchases of common stock - repurchase program
|
(110,981
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
23,127
|
|
20,412
|
|
23,091
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(99,229
|
)
|
(311,051
|
)
|
(4,228
|
)
|
|||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(5,856
|
)
|
494
|
|
(2,389
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
104,910
|
|
(137,102
|
)
|
(13,356
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of fiscal year
|
640,513
|
|
777,615
|
|
790,971
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of fiscal year
|
$
|
745,423
|
|
$
|
640,513
|
|
$
|
777,615
|
|
||
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
||||||||||
|
Cash paid during the fiscal year for interest
|
$
|
44,750
|
|
$
|
47,235
|
|
$
|
46,897
|
|
||
|
Cash paid during the fiscal year for income taxes, net
|
$
|
26,900
|
|
$
|
22,136
|
|
$
|
15,268
|
|
||
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities
|
|
||||||||||
|
Purchase of equipment in accounts payable
|
$
|
5,118
|
|
$
|
6,214
|
|
$
|
15,030
|
|
||
|
Equipment acquired under capital leases
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
5,322
|
|
||
|
Building subject to capital lease
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
50,370
|
|
$
|
8,993
|
|
||
|
Construction in progress subject to build-to-suit lease
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
39,914
|
|
||
|
Contingent consideration for acquisition of business
|
$
|
10,900
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Conversion of 3.75% convertible senior notes, due October 15, 2018 (Original) into 3,038,208 shares of common stock
|
$
|
61,270
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Conversion of 4.0% convertible senior notes, due December 15, 2020 into 9,197,943 shares of common stock, net
|
$
|
214,286
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
75
CIENA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) CIENA CORPORATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Description of Business
Ciena Corporation (“Ciena” or the “Company”) is a networking systems, services and software company, providing solutions that enable a wide range of network operators to deploy and manage next-generation networks that deliver services to businesses and consumers. Ciena provides network hardware, software and services that support the transport, switching, aggregation, service delivery and management of video, data and voice traffic on communications networks. Ciena’s solutions are used by communications service providers, cable and multiservice operators, Web-scale providers, submarine network operators, governments, enterprises, research and education (R&E) institutions and other emerging network operators.
Ciena’s solutions include a diverse portfolio of high-capacity Networking Platform products, which can be applied from the network core to network access points, and which allow network operators to scale capacity, increase transmission speeds, allocate traffic and adapt dynamically to changing end-user service demands. Ciena also offers Platform Software that provides management and domain control of our next-generation packet and optical platforms and automates network lifecycle operations including provisioning equipment and services. In addition, through its comprehensive suite of Blue Planet Automation Software, Ciena enables network operators to use network data and analytics to drive enhanced automation across multi-vendor and multi-domain network environments, accelerate service delivery and enable an increasingly predictive and autonomous network infrastructure. To complement its hardware and software solutions, Ciena offers broad range of attached and software-related services that help customers design, optimize, integrate, deploy, manage and maintain their networks and associated operational environments. Ciena’s complete portfolio of solutions enables customers to transform their network into a dynamic, programmable environment driven by automation and analytics, which Ciena refers to as the Adaptive Network. Ciena’s solutions for the Adaptive Network create business and operational value for customers, enabling them to introduce new revenue-generating services, reduce costs and maximize the return on their network infrastructure investment.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ciena and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Ciena has a 52 or 53 week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday nearest to the last day of October in each year (
November 3, 2018
,
October 28, 2017
and
October 29, 2016
for the periods reported).
Fiscal 2018
consisted of a 53-week fiscal year.
Fiscal 2017
and
fiscal 2016
each consisted of a 52-week fiscal year. For purposes of financial statement presentation, each fiscal year is described as having ended on October 31.
Business Combinations
Ciena records acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting. All of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies and contingent consideration are recognized at their fair value as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net tangible and net intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. The application of the purchase method of accounting for business combinations requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions in the determination of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, in order to properly allocate purchase price consideration between assets that are depreciated and amortized from goodwill. These assumptions and estimates include a market participant’s use of the asset and the appropriate discount rates for a market participant. Ciena’s estimates are based on historical experience, information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and, when appropriate, include assistance from independent third-party appraisal firms. Significant assumptions and estimates can include, but are not limited to, the cash flows that an asset is expected to generate in the future, the appropriate weighted-average cost of capital and the cost savings expected to be derived from acquiring an asset. These estimates are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. In addition, unanticipated events and circumstances may occur which may affect the accuracy or validity of such estimates.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used for selling prices for multiple element arrangements, shared-based compensation, bad debts, valuation of inventories and investments, recoverability of intangible
76
assets, other long-lived assets and goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring liabilities, derivatives, contingencies and litigation. Ciena bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that it believes are reasonable. Actual results may differ materially from management’s estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Ciena considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of
three
months or less to be cash equivalents. Any restricted cash collateralizing letters of credit is included in other current assets and other long-term assets depending upon the duration of the restriction.
Investments
Ciena’s investments are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Ciena recognizes losses in the income statement when it determines that declines in the fair value of its investments below their cost basis are other-than-temporary. In determining whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, Ciena considers various factors, including market price (when available), investment ratings, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than Ciena’s cost basis, and Ciena’s intent and ability to hold the investment until maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Ciena considers all marketable debt securities that it expects to convert to cash within one year or less to be short-term investments, with all others considered to be long-term investments.
Ciena has minority equity investments in privately held technology companies that are classified in other long-term assets. These investments are carried at cost because Ciena owns less than 20% of the voting equity and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the company. Ciena monitors these investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions to the carrying value when necessary. As of
October 31, 2018
, the combined carrying value of these investments was
$8.1 million
. Ciena has not estimated the fair value of these cost method investments because determining the fair value is not practicable. Ciena has not evaluated these investments for impairment as there have not been any events or changes in circumstances that Ciena believes would have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. Ciena records a provision for excess and obsolete inventory when an impairment has been identified.
Segment Reporting
Ciena’s chief operating decision maker, its chief executive officer, evaluates the company’s performance and allocates resources based on multiple factors, including measures of segment profit (loss). Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business activities that may earn revenue and incur expense, for which discrete financial information is available, and for which such information is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. Ciena has the following operating segments for reporting purposes: (i) Networking Platforms, (ii) Software and Software-Related Services, and (iii) Global Services. See Note
22
below.
Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair values assigned to the net assets acquired in a business combination. Ciena tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which it has determined to be the last business day of fiscal September each year. Ciena also tests goodwill for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value.
The first step in the process of assessing goodwill impairment is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with the unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test indicates that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step two requires goodwill impairments to be measured on the basis of the fair value of the reporting unit relative to the reporting unit’s carrying amount. A non-cash goodwill impairment charge would have the effect of decreasing earnings or increasing losses in such period. If Ciena is required to take a substantial impairment charge, its operating results would be materially adversely affected in such period.
77
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets include: equipment, building, furniture and fixtures; intangible assets; and maintenance spares. Ciena tests long-lived assets for impairment whenever triggering events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset’s carrying amount is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value. Ciena’s long-lived assets are assigned to asset groups that represent the lowest level for which cash flows can be identified.
Equipment, Building, Furniture and Fixtures and Internal Use Software
Equipment, building, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over useful lives of
two
to
five
years for equipment and furniture and fixtures and the shorter of useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements.
Qualifying internal use software and website development costs incurred during the application development stage, which consist primarily of outside services and purchased software license costs, are capitalized and amortized straight-line over the estimated useful lives of
two
to
five
years.
Intangible Assets
Ciena has recorded finite-lived intangible assets as a result of several acquisitions. Finite-lived intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the expected economic lives of the respective assets, up to
seven
years, which approximates the use of intangible assets.
Ciena has recorded in-process research and development projects acquired as the result of an acquisition as indefinite-lived intangible assets. Upon completion of the projects, the assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected economic life of the asset, which will be determined on that date. Should the project be determined to be abandoned, and if the asset developed has no alternative use, the full value of the asset will be charged to expense.
Maintenance Spares
Maintenance spares are recorded at cost. Spares usage cost is expensed ratably over
four
years.
Concentrations
Substantially all of Ciena’s cash and cash equivalents are maintained at a small number of major U.S. financial institutions. The majority of Ciena’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Because these deposits generally may be redeemed upon demand, management believes that they bear minimal risk.
Historically, a significant percentage of Ciena’s revenue has been concentrated among sales to a small number of large communications service providers. Consolidation among Ciena’s customers has increased this concentration. Consequently, Ciena’s accounts receivable are concentrated among these customers. See Note
22
below.
Additionally, Ciena’s access to certain materials or components is dependent upon sole or limited source suppliers. The inability of any of these suppliers to fulfill Ciena’s supply requirements, or significant changes in supply cost, could affect future results. Ciena relies on a small number of contract manufacturers to perform the majority of the manufacturing for its products. If Ciena cannot effectively manage these manufacturers or forecast future demand, or if these manufacturers fail to deliver products or components on time, Ciena’s business and results of operations may suffer.
Revenue Recognition
Ciena recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Customer purchase agreements and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and evidence of customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery or services rendered. Ciena assesses whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. Ciena assesses collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history.
78
Revenue for maintenance services is deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are performed. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in revenue, with the associated expenses included in product cost of goods sold.
Software revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. In instances where final acceptance criteria of the software are specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
Ciena limits the amount of revenue recognition for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products or services, future performance obligations or subject to customer-specified return or refund privileges.
Revenue for multiple element arrangements is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative selling price of each delivered element, with revenue recognized for each delivered element when the revenue recognition criteria are met. Ciena determines the selling price for each deliverable based upon the selling price hierarchy for multiple-deliverable arrangements. Under this hierarchy, Ciena uses vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of selling price, if it exists, or third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exists for a deliverable, Ciena uses its best estimate of selling price ("BESP") for that deliverable. For multiple element software arrangements where VSOE of undelivered maintenance does not exist, revenue for the entire arrangement is recognized over the maintenance term.
VSOE, when determinable, is established based on Ciena’s pricing and discounting practices for the specific product or service when sold separately. In determining whether VSOE exists, Ciena requires that a substantial majority of the selling prices for a product or service falls within a reasonably narrow pricing range. Ciena has been unable to establish TPE of selling price because its go-to-market strategy differs from that of others in its markets, and the extent of customization and differentiated features and functions varies among comparable products or services from its peers. Ciena determines BESP based upon management-approved pricing guidelines, which consider multiple factors including the type of product or service, gross margin objectives, competitive and market conditions, and the go-to-market strategy, all of which can affect pricing practices.
Warranty Accruals
Ciena provides for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon recognition of the related revenue. Estimated warranty costs include estimates for material costs, technical support labor costs and associated overhead. Warranty is included in cost of goods sold and is determined based upon actual warranty cost experience, estimates of component failure rates and management’s industry experience. Ciena’s sales contracts do not permit the right of return of the product by the customer after the product has been accepted.
Accounts Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable includes both billed accounts receivable and unbilled accounts receivable due from customers. Unbilled accounts receivable is derived from contract arrangements whereby the billing term is post the revenue recognition term. Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts is based on its assessment, on a specific identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. Ciena performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally has not required collateral or other forms of security from them. In determining the appropriate balance for Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to determine collectibility. In doing so, management considers creditworthiness, payment history, account activity and communication with the customer. If a customer’s financial condition changes, Ciena may be required to record an allowance for doubtful accounts for that customer, which could negatively affect its results of operations.
Research and Development
Ciena charges all research and development costs to expense as incurred. Types of expense incurred in research and development include employee compensation, prototype equipment, consulting and third-party services, depreciation, facility costs and information technology.
Government Grants
Ciena accounts for proceeds from government grants as a reduction of expense when there is reasonable assurance that Ciena has met the required conditions associated with the grant and that grant proceeds will be received. Grant benefits are
79
recorded to the particular line item of the Consolidated Statement of Operations to which the grant activity relates. See Note
24
below.
Advertising Costs
Ciena expenses all advertising costs as incurred.
Legal Costs
Ciena expenses legal costs associated with litigation as incurred.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Ciena measures and recognizes compensation expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair values on the date of grant. Ciena estimates the fair value of each option-based award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model is affected by Ciena’s stock price as well as estimates regarding a number of variables, including expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the award and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Ciena estimates the fair value of each restricted stock unit award based on the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. In each case, Ciena only recognizes expense in its Consolidated Statement of Operations for those stock options or restricted stock units that are expected ultimately to vest. Ciena recognizes the estimated fair value of performance-based awards as share-based expense over the performance period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, based upon Ciena’s determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At the end of each reporting period, Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets, and the expense is adjusted accordingly. Ciena uses the straight-line method to record expense for share-based awards with only service-based vesting. See Note
21
below.
Income Taxes
Ciena accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach. This approach recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their respective tax bases, and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. In estimating future tax consequences, Ciena considers all expected future events other than the enactment of changes in tax laws or rates. Valuation allowances are provided if, based upon the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
In the ordinary course of business, transactions occur for which the ultimate outcome may be uncertain. In addition, tax authorities periodically audit Ciena’s income tax returns. These audits examine significant tax filing positions, including the timing and amounts of deductions and the allocation of income tax expenses among tax jurisdictions. Ciena is currently under audit in India for 2012 and 2014 through 2017, and in Canada for 2011 through 2015. Management does not expect the outcome of these audits to have a material adverse effect on Ciena’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Ciena’s major tax jurisdictions and the earliest open tax years are as follows: United States (2015), United Kingdom (2015), Canada (2011), India (2012) and Brazil (2013). Limited adjustments can be made to Federal U.S. tax returns in earlier years in order to reduce net operating loss carryforwards. Ciena classifies interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.
Ciena has not provided for U.S. deferred income taxes on the cumulative unremitted earnings of its non-U.S. affiliates, as it plans to indefinitely reinvest these foreign earnings outside the U.S. As of October 31, 2018, the cumulative amount of such temporary differences for which a deferred tax liability has not been recognized totaled approximately
$336 million
. If these earnings were distributed to the U.S. in the form of dividends, or otherwise, or if the shares of the relevant foreign subsidiaries were sold or otherwise transferred, Ciena would be subject to additional U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and foreign withholding taxes.
Ciena is required to record excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies related to stock-based compensation as income tax benefit or expense when share-based awards vest or are settled.
The Tax Act includes provisions that do not affect Ciena in fiscal 2018, including a provision designed to tax global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”). Due to the complexity of the GILTI tax rules, this provision and related tax accounting will continue to be evaluated. An accounting policy choice is allowed to either treat taxes due on future U.S. inclusions related to GILTI in taxable income as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”) or factor such amounts into
80
the measurement of deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). The calculation of the deferred balance with respect to the new GILTI tax provisions will depend, in part, on analyzing global income to determine whether future U.S. inclusions in taxable income are expected related to GILTI and, if so, what the impact is expected to be. Ciena is electing to use the period cost method for future GILTI inclusions. Additionally, Ciena is electing to use the incremental cash tax savings approach when determining whether a valuation allowance needs to be recorded against the U.S. net operating loss (“NOL”) due to the GILTI inclusions.
The Tax Act also introduced an alternative tax known as the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT). An accounting policy choice can be made on whether or not to consider the impact of BEAT on its valuation allowance. Ciena continues to evaluate very recent regulatory guidance in order to assess its impact. Accordingly, an accounting policy choice has not yet been made.
Loss Contingencies
Ciena is subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of business. These may relate to disputes, litigation and other legal actions. Ciena considers the likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as Ciena’s ability to estimate the amount of loss reasonably, in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Ciena regularly evaluates current information available to it in order to determine whether any accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of Ciena’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair market value due to the relatively short period of time to maturity. For information related to the fair value of Ciena’s convertible notes and term loans, see Note
16
below.
Fair value for the measurement of financial assets and liabilities is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Ciena utilizes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs for fair value measurement. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:
|
•
|
Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
|
|
•
|
Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in less active markets or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and
|
|
•
|
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on Ciena’s assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.
|
By distinguishing between inputs that are observable in the marketplace, and therefore more objective, and those that are unobservable, and therefore more subjective, the hierarchy is designed to indicate the relative reliability of the fair value measurements. A financial asset’s or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Restructuring
From time to time, Ciena takes actions to better align its workforce, facilities and operating costs with perceived market opportunities, business strategies and changes in market and business conditions. Ciena recognizes a liability for the cost associated with an exit or disposal activity in the period in which the liability is incurred, except for one-time employee termination benefits related to a service period, typically of more than
60 days
, which are accrued over the service period. See Note
3
below.
Foreign Currency
Certain of Ciena’s foreign branch offices and subsidiaries use the U.S. Dollar as their functional currency because Ciena Corporation, as the U.S. parent entity, exclusively funds the operations of these branch offices and subsidiaries. For those subsidiaries using the local currency as their functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect
81
at the balance sheet date, and the statement of operations is translated at a monthly average rate. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded directly to a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Where the monetary assets and liabilities are transacted in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, re-measurement adjustments are recorded in interest and other income (loss), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note
4
below.
Derivatives
Ciena’s
3.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (the "New Notes") included a conversion feature that is accounted for as a separate embedded derivative. The embedded conversion feature is recorded at fair value on a recurring basis using the underlying stock price, time to maturity and expected volatility of Ciena’s stock and conversion price. These changes are included in interest and other income (loss), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
From time to time, Ciena uses foreign currency forward contracts to reduce variability in certain forecasted non-U.S. Dollar denominated cash flows. Generally, these derivatives have maturities of
24
months or less. Ciena also has interest rate swap arrangements to reduce variability in certain forecasted interest expense associated with its term loan. All of these derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges. At the inception of the cash flow hedge, and on an ongoing basis, Ciena assesses whether the derivative has been effective in offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the hedged risk during the hedging period. The derivative’s net gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and, upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified to the line item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations to which the hedged transaction relates.
Ciena records derivative instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows within operating, investing, or financing activities consistent with the cash flows of the hedged items.
From time to time, Ciena uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain balance sheet foreign exchange exposures. These forward contracts are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and any net gain or loss associated with these derivatives is reported in interest and other income (loss), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
See Notes
6
and
14
below.
Computation of Net Income (Loss) per Share
Ciena calculates basic earnings per share (“EPS”) by dividing earnings attributable to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes other potential dilutive shares that would be outstanding if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Ciena uses a dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of its income statement. A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used for the basic and diluted EPS computations is set forth in Note
18
below.
Software Development Costs
Ciena develops software for sale to its customers. GAAP requires the capitalization of certain software development costs that are incurred subsequent to the date technological feasibility is established and prior to the date the product is generally available for sale. The capitalized cost is then amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated life of the product. Ciena defines technological feasibility as being attained at the time a working model is completed. To date, the period between Ciena achieving technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been short, and software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant. Accordingly, Ciena has not capitalized any software development costs.
Newly Issued Accounting Standards - Effective
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-01
(“ASU 2017-01”)
,
Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business
, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisition or disposal of assets or businesses. The amendments in this update provide a screen to determine when a set of assets is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set of assets is not a business. Ciena adopted ASU 2017-01 during the first quarter of fiscal 2018.
82
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12
(“ASU 2017-12”)
,
Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
, which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current GAAP. The amendments in this update better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships, through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and presentation of hedge results. Ciena adopted ASU 2017-12 during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. For hedges for which Ciena has elected to exclude the spot-forward difference from assessment of effectiveness, Ciena has elected to amortize the difference on a straight-line basis. Ciena will record amortization in earnings each period with an offsetting entry to other comprehensive income, and all changes in fair value over the term of the derivative in other comprehensive income. The application of this accounting standard did not have a material impact on Ciena’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09
(“ASU 2016-09”)
,
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
, which provides guidance on several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification on the statement of cash flows. Ciena adopted ASU 2016-09 during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. In connection with the adoption of this guidance, Ciena recognized approximately
$62.1 million
of deferred tax assets related to previously unrecognized tax benefits. This was recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated deficit as of the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Additionally, the consolidated statements of cash flows will include excess tax benefits as an operating activity, on a prospective basis as a result of the adoption. Finally, Ciena has elected to recognize forfeitures when they occur, rather than to estimate the impact of forfeitures when the award is granted. Accordingly, Ciena recognized approximately
$0.8 million
for this change through a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to opening accumulated deficit in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.
Newly Issued Accounting Standards - Not Yet Effective
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
, a new accounting standard related to revenue recognition. ASC 606 supersedes nearly all U.S. GAAP on revenue recognition and eliminated industry-specific guidance. The underlying principle of ASC 606 is to recognize revenue when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services at an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. It also requires increased disclosures including the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows related to contracts with customers.
For multiple element software arrangements where vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of undelivered maintenance does not exist, Ciena currently recognizes revenue for the entire arrangement over the maintenance term. The adoption of ASC 606 will require Ciena to determine the stand alone selling price for each of the software and software-related deliverables at contract inception, and Ciena consequently notes that certain software deliverables will be recognized at a point in time rather than over a period of time.
Ciena also notes that certain installation and deployment, and consulting and network design services, will be recognized over a period of time rather than at a point in time.
Ciena has considered the impact of the guidance in ASC 340-40,
Other Assets and Deferred Costs; Contracts with Customers
, and the interpretations of the FASB Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition (TRG) with respect to capitalization and amortization of incremental costs of obtaining a contract. In conjunction with this interpretation, Ciena has elected to implement the practical expedient allowing for incremental costs to be recognized as an expense when incurred if the period of the asset recognition is one year or less, and amortized over the period of performance, if the period of the asset recognition is greater than one year.
Ciena elected to implement ASC 606
using the modified retrospective approach whereby the cumulative effect at adoption will be presented as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit. The comparative information will not be restated and will continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. ASC 606 will be effective for Ciena beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
Upon adopting ASC 606 at the beginning of fiscal 2019, the cumulative effect adjustment will reduce accumulated deficit by approximately
$49.2 million
. This cumulative effect adjustment is primarily driven by a reduction to deferred product revenue of approximately
$30.2 million
related to software arrangements and an increase to unbilled accounts receivable of approximately
$29.6 million
primarily related to installation and deployment and consulting and network design service arrangements, with additional amounts related to hardware sales and other adjustments. In addition to the adjustment to deferred revenue and unbilled accounts receivable, other adjustments at transition include immaterial adjustments to billed
83
accounts receivable, deferred product costs, prepaid service costs and other current and non-current assets, and other liabilities. The adjustment to other current and non-current assets is primarily for capitalized incremental contract acquisitions costs. The cumulative effect adjustment is recorded net of tax with the direct tax effect recorded primarily as an increase in deferred tax liability.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02
(“ASU 2016-02”)
,
Leases
, which requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by leased assets and to provide additional disclosures. ASU 2016-02 is effective for Ciena beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. Under current GAAP, the majority of Ciena’s leases for its properties are considered operating leases, and Ciena expects that the adoption of this ASU will require these leases to be classified as financing leases and to be recognized as assets and liabilities on Ciena’s balance sheet. Ciena is continuing to evaluate other possible impacts of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13 (
“ASU 2018-13”
),
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework
which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for Ciena beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020, early adoption is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2018-13 will not have a material effect on Ciena’s financial position or results of operations.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15 (
“ASU 2018-15”
),
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software
which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. ASU 2018-15 is effective for Ciena beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020, early adoption is permitted. Ciena is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
(2) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
DonRiver Holdings, LLC Acquisition
On
October 1, 2018
, Ciena acquired DonRiver Holdings, LLC (“DonRiver”), a global software and services company specializing in federated network and service inventory management solutions within the service provider Operational Support Systems (OSS) environment. This transaction has been accounted for as the acquisition of a business.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Ciena incurred approximately
$3.5 million
of acquisition-related costs associated with this transaction. These costs and expenses include fees associated with financial, legal and accounting advisors and other employment-related costs.
The following table summarizes the purchase price for the acquisition (in thousands):
|
Amount
|
|||
|
Cash
|
$
|
43,283
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
10,900
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
54,183
|
|
The following table summarizes the final purchase price allocation related to the acquisition based on the estimated fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (in thousands):
84
|
Amount
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,025
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
4,790
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other long term assets
|
372
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
10,453
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships and contracts
|
37,700
|
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
Other current and long term liabilities
|
(9,664
|
)
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
54,183
|
|
The acquisition of DonRiver includes a $
28.5 million
three
-year earn-out arrangement that consists of both a contingent consideration element and a contingent compensation element. The contingent consideration element requires additional cash consideration to be paid based on the future revenues generally derived from the DonRiver business over a
25
-month period from the acquisition date through October 31, 2020. The undiscounted amounts potentially payable by Ciena under the contingent consideration element range from $
0.0 million
to $
15.0 million
in the aggregate over the period. Any amounts earned under the contingent consideration element are payable in the first quarters of fiscal 2019, fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021. The $
10.9 million
fair value of the contingent consideration element as of the acquisition date was estimated by applying the income approach based upon a discounted cash flow technique using Monte Carlo simulations. The contingent compensation element of the earn-out arrangement includes an employment condition for the selling shareholders who became employees of Ciena upon the completion of the acquisition. The range of amounts that Ciena could pay under the contingent compensation element is between $
0.0 million
and $
13.5 million
in the aggregate over the period. Any amounts earned under the contingent compensation element are payable in the first quarters of fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022. These amounts will be accrued over the period earned and recorded as expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Customer relationships and contracts represent agreements with existing DonRiver customers. Customer relationships and contracts are amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful life of
seven
years. Fair value was determined using the multi-period excess earnings method based on the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows (or “excess earnings”) attributable to customer relationships for a discrete projection period.
Developed technology represents purchased technology that had reached technological feasibility and for which DonRiver had substantially completed development as of the date of acquisition. Fair value was determined using future discounted cash flows related to the projected income stream of the developed technology for a discrete projection period. Cash flows were discounted to their present value as of the closing date. Developed technology is amortized on a straight line basis over its estimated useful life of
seven
years.
The goodwill generated from the acquisition of DonRiver is primarily related to expected synergies. The total goodwill amount was recorded in the Software and Software-Related Services segment. The goodwill related to this acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.
Pro forma disclosures have not been included due to immateriality.
Packet Design, LLC Acquisition
On
July 2, 2018
, Ciena acquired Packet Design, LLC (“Packet Design”), a provider of network performance management software focused on Layer 3 network optimization, topology and route analytics, in a cash transaction for approximately
$41.1 million
in cash. This transaction has been accounted for as the acquisition of a business.
During fiscal 2018, Ciena incurred approximately
$1.6
million of acquisition-related costs associated with this transaction. These costs and expenses include fees associated with financial, legal and accounting advisors and severance and other employment-related costs, including payments to certain former Packet Design employees.
The following table summarizes the final purchase price allocation related to the acquisition based on the estimated fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (in thousands):
85
|
Amount
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
642
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
450
|
|
|
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
31
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
20,304
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships and contracts
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
21,900
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
(657
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
(5,176
|
)
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
41,054
|
|
Customer relationships and contracts represent agreements with existing Packet Design customers. Customer relationships and contracts are amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful life of
three
years.
Developed technology represents purchased technology that had reached technological feasibility and for which Packet Design had substantially completed development as of the date of acquisition. Fair value was determined using future discounted cash flows related to the projected income stream of the developed technology for a discrete projection period. Cash flows were discounted to their present value as of the closing date. Developed technology is amortized on a straight line basis over its estimated useful life of
five
years.
The goodwill generated from the acquisition of Packet Design is primarily related to expected synergies. The total goodwill amount was recorded in the Software and Software-Related Services segment. The goodwill related to this acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.
Pro forma disclosures have not been included due to immateriality.
TeraXion HSPC Asset Acquisition
On February 1, 2016, Ciena, through a Canadian subsidiary, acquired certain high-speed photonics components (“HSPC”) assets of TeraXion Inc. (“TeraXion”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary for approximately
$32 million
in cash. The assets purchased include TeraXion’s high-speed indium phosphide and silicon photonics technologies, as well as the underlying intellectual property. These technologies support the development of Ciena’s WaveLogic coherent optical chipsets. This transaction has been accounted for as the acquisition of a business.
The following table summarizes the final purchase price allocation related to the acquisition of the HSPC assets based on the estimated fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (in thousands):
|
Amount
|
|||
|
Inventory
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
16,468
|
|
|
|
In-process technology
|
3,949
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
10,083
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
32,000
|
|
Developed technology represents purchased technology that had reached technological feasibility and for which TeraXion had substantially completed development as of the date of acquisition. Fair value was determined using future discounted cash flows related to the projected income stream of the developed technology for a discrete projection period. Cash flows were discounted to their present value as of the closing date. Developed technology is amortized on a straight line basis over its estimated useful life of
five years
.
86
In-process technology represents purchased technology that had not reached technological feasibility as of the date of acquisition. Fair value was determined using future discounted cash flows related to the projected income stream of the in-process technology for a discrete projection period. Cash flows were discounted to their present value as of the closing date. Upon completion of the in-process technology, it will be amortized on a straight line basis over its estimated useful life, which will be determined on that date.
The goodwill generated from the acquisition of the HSPC assets was primarily related to expected synergies and has been allocated to the Networking Platforms segment. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.
Pro forma disclosures have not been included due to immateriality.
(3) RESTRUCTURING COSTS
Ciena has undertaken a number of restructuring activities intended to reduce expense and better align its workforce and costs with market opportunities, product development and business strategies. The following table sets forth the restructuring activity and balance of the restructuring liability accounts for the fiscal years indicated (in thousands):
|
Workforce
reduction
|
Consolidation
of excess
facilities
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2015
|
$
|
591
|
|
$
|
688
|
|
|
$
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
Additional liability recorded
|
2,844
|
|
(1)
|
2,089
|
|
4,933
|
|
||||
|
Cash payments
|
(2,567
|
)
|
(807
|
)
|
(3,374
|
)
|
|||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2016
|
868
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|||
|
Additional liability recorded
|
5,883
|
|
(2)
|
5,432
|
|
(4)
|
11,315
|
|
|||
|
Adjustment to previous estimates
|
—
|
|
|
(1,048
|
)
|
(1,048
|
)
|
||||
|
Cash payments
|
(5,460
|
)
|
(4,706
|
)
|
(10,166
|
)
|
|||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2017
|
1,291
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
2,939
|
|
|||
|
Additional liability recorded
|
14,853
|
|
(3)
|
3,890
|
|
(5)
|
18,743
|
|
|||
|
Cash payments
|
(14,036
|
)
|
(3,799
|
)
|
(17,835
|
)
|
|||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2018
|
$
|
2,108
|
|
|
$
|
1,739
|
|
|
$
|
3,847
|
|
|
Current restructuring liabilities
|
$
|
2,108
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
$
|
2,610
|
|
|
Non-current restructuring liabilities
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
_________________________________
|
(1)
|
During fiscal 2016, Ciena recorded a charge of
$2.8 million
of severance and other employee-related costs associated with a workforce reduction of approximately
75
employees.
|
|
(2)
|
During fiscal 2017, Ciena recorded a charge of
$5.9 million
of severance and other employee-related costs associated with a workforce reduction of approximately
100
employees.
|
|
(3)
|
During fiscal 2018, Ciena recorded a charge of
$14.9 million
of severance and other employee-related costs associated with a workforce reduction of approximately
240
employees.
|
|
(4)
|
Reflects unfavorable lease commitments and relocation costs incurred in connection with our research and development center facility transitions in Ottawa, Canada.
|
|
(5)
|
Reflects unfavorable lease commitments in connection with a portion of facilities located in Petaluma, California and in Gurgaon, India.
|
(4) INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME (LOSS), NET
The components of interest and other income (loss), net, were as follows (in thousands):
87
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||||
|
Interest income
|
$
|
13,703
|
|
$
|
6,579
|
|
$
|
4,058
|
|
|||
|
Gain (loss) on non-hedge designated foreign currency forward contracts
|
6,791
|
|
(1,198
|
)
|
(23,355
|
)
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses)
|
(19,434
|
)
|
(4,376
|
)
|
5,870
|
|
||||||
|
Loss on fair value of debt conversion liability
|
(12,070
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other
|
(1,019
|
)
|
(92
|
)
|
858
|
|
||||||
|
Interest and other income (loss), net
|
$
|
(12,029
|
)
|
$
|
913
|
|
$
|
(12,569
|
)
|
|||
Ciena Corporation, as the U.S. parent entity, uses the U.S. Dollar as its functional currency; however, some of its foreign branch offices and subsidiaries use the local currency as their functional currency. During
fiscal 2018
and
fiscal 2017
, Ciena recorded
$19.4 million
and
$4.4 million
, respectively, in exchange rate losses, as a result of monetary assets and liabilities that were transacted in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, and the re-measurement adjustments were recorded in interest and other income (loss), net. For fiscal
2018
, the majority of the foreign currency exchange rate losses relate to Ciena’s Brazilian and Argentinian subsidiaries owing U.S. Dollars to Ciena Corporation. In
fiscal 2016
, Ciena recorded
$5.9 million
in foreign currency exchange gains. From time to time, Ciena uses foreign currency forwards to hedge these balance sheet exposures. These forwards are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and any net gain or loss associated with these derivatives is also reported in interest and other income (loss), net. During fiscal
2018
, Ciena recorded a gain of
$6.8 million
from non-hedge designated foreign currency forward contracts. For fiscal
2017
and
fiscal 2016
, Ciena recorded losses of
$1.2 million
, and
$23.4 million
respectively, from non-hedge designated foreign currency forward contracts.
(5) SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS
As of
October 31, 2018
, investments are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amortized Cost
|
Gross Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. government obligations:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Included in short-term investments
|
$
|
139,365
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(347
|
)
|
$
|
139,018
|
|
|||
|
Included in long-term investments
|
59,029
|
|
—
|
|
(59
|
)
|
58,970
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
198,394
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(406
|
)
|
$
|
197,988
|
|
||||
|
Commercial paper:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Included in short-term investments
|
$
|
9,963
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
9,963
|
|
|||
|
$
|
9,963
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
9,963
|
|
||||
As of
October 31, 2017
, investments are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31, 2017
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amortized Cost
|
Gross Unrealized
Gains |
Gross Unrealized
Losses |
Estimated Fair
Value |
||||||||||||
|
U.S. government obligations:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Included in short-term investments
|
$
|
249,498
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(305
|
)
|
$
|
249,193
|
|
|||
|
Included in long-term investments
|
49,910
|
|
—
|
|
(127
|
)
|
49,783
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
299,408
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(432
|
)
|
$
|
298,976
|
|
||||
|
Commercial paper:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Included in short-term investments
|
$
|
29,939
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
29,940
|
|
|||
|
$
|
29,939
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
29,940
|
|
||||
88
The following table summarizes the legal maturities of debt investments at
October 31, 2018
:
|
|
October 31, 2018
|
||||||
|
Amortized Cost
|
Estimated Fair
Value |
||||||
|
Less than one year
|
$
|
149,328
|
|
$
|
148,981
|
|
|
|
Due in 1-2 years
|
59,029
|
|
58,970
|
|
|||
|
$
|
208,357
|
|
$
|
207,951
|
|
||
(6) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
As of the dates indicated, the following tables summarize the fair value of assets and liabilities that were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
October 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Money market funds
|
$
|
590,684
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
590,684
|
|
|||
|
U.S. government obligations
|
—
|
|
197,988
|
|
—
|
|
197,988
|
|
|||||||
|
Commercial paper
|
—
|
|
69,888
|
|
—
|
|
69,888
|
|
|||||||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
—
|
|
133
|
|
—
|
|
133
|
|
|||||||
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps
|
—
|
|
779
|
|
—
|
|
779
|
|
|||||||
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
590,684
|
|
$
|
268,788
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
859,472
|
|
|||
|
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,231
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,231
|
|
|||
|
Debt conversion liability
|
—
|
|
164,212
|
|
—
|
|
164,212
|
|
|||||||
|
Contingent consideration
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,900
|
|
10,900
|
|
|||||||
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
167,443
|
|
$
|
10,900
|
|
$
|
178,343
|
|
|||
|
|
October 31, 2017
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Money market funds
|
$
|
511,355
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
511,355
|
|
|||
|
U.S. government obligations
|
—
|
|
298,976
|
|
—
|
|
298,976
|
|
|||||||
|
Commercial paper
|
—
|
|
89,865
|
|
—
|
|
89,865
|
|
|||||||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
—
|
|
227
|
|
—
|
|
227
|
|
|||||||
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps
|
—
|
|
218
|
|
—
|
|
218
|
|
|||||||
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
511,355
|
|
$
|
389,286
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
900,641
|
|
|||
|
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
|||
As of the dates indicated, the assets and liabilities above were presented on Ciena’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows (in thousands):
89
|
|
October 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents
|
$
|
590,684
|
|
$
|
59,925
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
650,609
|
|
|||
|
Short-term investments
|
—
|
|
148,981
|
|
—
|
|
148,981
|
|
|||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
—
|
|
133
|
|
—
|
|
133
|
|
|||||||
|
Long-term investments
|
—
|
|
58,970
|
|
—
|
|
58,970
|
|
|||||||
|
Other long-term assets
|
—
|
|
779
|
|
—
|
|
779
|
|
|||||||
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
590,684
|
|
$
|
268,788
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
859,472
|
|
|||
|
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Accrued liabilities
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,231
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,231
|
|
|||
|
Debt conversion liability
|
—
|
|
164,212
|
|
—
|
|
164,212
|
|
|||||||
|
Other long-term obligations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,900
|
|
10,900
|
|
|||||||
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
167,443
|
|
$
|
10,900
|
|
$
|
178,343
|
|
|||
|
|
October 31, 2017
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents
|
$
|
511,355
|
|
$
|
59,925
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
571,280
|
|
|||
|
Short-term investments
|
—
|
|
279,133
|
|
—
|
|
279,133
|
|
|||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
—
|
|
227
|
|
—
|
|
227
|
|
|||||||
|
Long-term investments
|
—
|
|
49,783
|
|
—
|
|
49,783
|
|
|||||||
|
Other long-term assets
|
—
|
|
218
|
|
—
|
|
218
|
|
|||||||
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
511,355
|
|
$
|
389,286
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
900,641
|
|
|||
|
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Accrued liabilities
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
|||
Ciena did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the periods presented.
Ciena’s Level 3 liability is included in other long-term obligations and reflects a contingent consideration element of a
three
-year payout arrangement associated with Ciena’s purchase of DonRiver in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. See Note
2
above. The contingent consideration is valued by applying the income approach based upon a discounted cash flow technique using Monte Carlo simulations. As of October 31, 2018, there was no change to the fair value.
(7) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable includes $
40.9 million
and $
26.1 million
of unbilled receivables as
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
, respectively. As of
October 31, 2018
, one customer accounted for
10.0%
of net accounts receivable. As of
October 31, 2017
, two customers together accounted for
23.0%
of net accounts receivable. Ciena has not historically experienced a significant amount of bad debt expense. During fiscal 2017, Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts includes a provision for a significant asset impairment of
$13.7 million
for a trade receivable related to a single customer in the APAC region. The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts for the fiscal years indicated (in thousands):
90
|
Year ended
|
Beginning
|
Net
|
Ending
|
|||||||||||||
|
October 31,
|
Balance
|
Provisions
|
Deductions
|
Balance
|
||||||||||||
|
2016
|
$
|
2,963
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
$
|
3,963
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
$
|
3,963
|
|
$
|
18,221
|
|
$
|
4,604
|
|
$
|
17,580
|
|
||||
|
2018
|
$
|
17,580
|
|
$
|
2,700
|
|
$
|
2,902
|
|
$
|
17,378
|
|
||||
(8) INVENTORIES
As of the dates indicated, inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Raw materials
|
$
|
67,468
|
|
$
|
52,898
|
|
|
|
Work-in-process
|
9,589
|
|
18,623
|
|
|||
|
Finished goods
|
188,575
|
|
185,488
|
|
|||
|
Deferred cost of goods sold
|
48,057
|
|
61,340
|
|
|||
|
|
313,689
|
|
318,349
|
|
|||
|
Provision for excess and obsolescence
|
(50,938
|
)
|
(51,206
|
)
|
|||
|
|
$
|
262,751
|
|
$
|
267,143
|
|
|
Ciena writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory by an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated net realizable value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. During
fiscal 2018
, fiscal
2017
and
fiscal 2016
, Ciena recorded a provision for excess and obsolescence of
$30.6 million
,
$35.5 million
, and
$33.7 million
, respectively, primarily related to the decrease in the forecasted demand for certain Converged Packet Optical products. Deductions from the provision for excess and obsolete inventory relate to disposal activities.
The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s reserve for excess and obsolete inventory for the fiscal years indicated (in thousands):
|
Year ended
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||
|
October 31,
|
Balance
|
Provisions
|
Disposals
|
Balance
|
||||||||||||
|
2016
|
$
|
53,001
|
|
$
|
33,713
|
|
$
|
24,211
|
|
$
|
62,503
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
$
|
62,503
|
|
$
|
35,459
|
|
$
|
46,756
|
|
$
|
51,206
|
|
||||
|
2018
|
$
|
51,206
|
|
$
|
30,615
|
|
$
|
30,883
|
|
$
|
50,938
|
|
||||
(9) PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER
As of the dates indicated, prepaid expenses and other are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Prepaid VAT and other taxes
|
$
|
82,518
|
|
$
|
91,647
|
|
|
|
Product demonstration equipment, net
|
37,623
|
|
40,713
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
32,987
|
|
26,114
|
|
|||
|
Other non-trade receivables
|
25,716
|
|
9,655
|
|
|||
|
Deferred deployment expense
|
19,342
|
|
26,934
|
|
|||
|
Financing receivable
|
626
|
|
2,049
|
|
|||
|
Derivative assets
|
133
|
|
227
|
|
|||
|
|
$
|
198,945
|
|
$
|
197,339
|
|
|
91
Depreciation of product demonstration equipment was
$9.0 million
,
$10.0 million
and
$10.7 million
for fiscal
2018
,
2017
and
2016
, respectively.
(10) EQUIPMENT, BUILDING, FURNITURE AND FIXTURES
As of the dates indicated, equipment, building, furniture and fixtures are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
$
|
504,714
|
|
$
|
486,451
|
|
|
|
Building subject to capital lease
|
71,968
|
|
76,702
|
|
|||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
94,195
|
|
87,763
|
|
|||
|
|
670,877
|
|
650,916
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(378,810
|
)
|
(342,451
|
)
|
|||
|
|
$
|
292,067
|
|
$
|
308,465
|
|
|
During fiscal
2018
, fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
, Ciena recorded depreciation of equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, and amortization of leasehold improvements of
$75.3 million
,
$67.2 million
and
$52.7 million
, respectively.
(11) INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As of the dates indicated, intangible assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross
Intangible
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
Intangible
|
Gross
Intangible
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
Intangible
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Developed technology
|
$
|
373,581
|
|
$
|
(285,233
|
)
|
$
|
88,348
|
|
$
|
341,255
|
|
$
|
(266,693
|
)
|
$
|
74,562
|
|
|||||
|
In-process research and development
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
671
|
|
—
|
|
671
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Patents and licenses
|
3,565
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
1,607
|
|
7,165
|
|
(6,535
|
)
|
630
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Customer relationships, covenants not to compete, outstanding purchase orders and contracts
|
374,620
|
|
(316,350
|
)
|
58,270
|
|
334,642
|
|
(309,508
|
)
|
25,134
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Total intangible assets
|
$
|
751,766
|
|
$
|
(603,541
|
)
|
$
|
148,225
|
|
$
|
683,733
|
|
$
|
(582,736
|
)
|
$
|
100,997
|
|
|||||
During fiscal 2018 and 2017, certain fully amortized intangible assets of approximately
$5.0 million
and
$34.0 million
, respectively, were eliminated from gross intangible assets and accumulated amortization during the period, with no corresponding impact to the income statement. These assets were primarily technology for products no longer being sold by Ciena.
The aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets was
$25.8 million
,
$45.7 million
and
$78.3 million
for fiscal
2018
, fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
, respectively. Expected future amortization of intangible assets for the fiscal years indicated is as follows (in thousands):
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
|
||
|
2019
|
$
|
35,375
|
|
|
2020
|
34,019
|
|
|
|
2021
|
30,841
|
|
|
|
2022
|
24,820
|
|
|
|
2023
|
10,011
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
13,159
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,225
|
|
(12) GOODWILL
92
The following table presents the goodwill allocated to our operating segments as of October 31, 2018 and October 31, 2017 , as well as the changes to goodwill during fiscal 2018 . (in thousands):
|
Balance at October 31, 2017
|
Acquisitions
|
Impairments
|
Translation
|
Balance at October 31, 2018
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Software and Software-Related Services
|
$
|
201,428
|
|
$
|
30,757
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
232,185
|
|
||||
|
Networking Platforms
|
66,030
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(247
|
)
|
65,783
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
267,458
|
|
$
|
30,757
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(247
|
)
|
$
|
297,968
|
|
||||
(13) OTHER BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
As of the dates indicated, other long-term assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Maintenance spares inventory, net
|
$
|
45,679
|
|
$
|
46,872
|
|
|
|
Minority equity investments
|
8,056
|
|
6,000
|
|
|||
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps
|
779
|
|
218
|
|
|||
|
Deferred debt issuance costs, net
(1)
|
720
|
|
1,041
|
|
|||
|
Financing receivable
|
—
|
|
1,052
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
16,418
|
|
8,410
|
|
|||
|
|
$
|
71,652
|
|
$
|
63,593
|
|
|
(1) Deferred debt issuance costs relate to Ciena’s ABL Credit Facility (described in Note
17
below). The amortization of deferred debt issuance costs for Ciena’s ABL Credit Facility is included in interest expense, and was
$0.3 million
,
$0.3 million
and
$0.4 million
for fiscal
2018
, fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
, respectively.
As of the dates indicated, accrued liabilities and other short-term obligations are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Compensation, payroll related tax and benefits
|
$
|
140,277
|
|
$
|
113,272
|
|
|
|
Warranty
|
44,740
|
|
42,456
|
|
|||
|
Vacation
|
42,507
|
|
39,778
|
|
|||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
3,547
|
|
3,772
|
|
|||
|
Interest payable
|
1,072
|
|
3,612
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
107,932
|
|
120,044
|
|
|||
|
|
$
|
340,075
|
|
$
|
322,934
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s accrued warranty for the fiscal years indicated (in thousands):
|
Year ended
|
Beginning
|
Current Year
|
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||
|
October 31,
|
Balance
|
Provisions
(1)
|
Settlements
|
Balance
|
||||||||||||
|
2016
|
$
|
56,654
|
|
$
|
15,483
|
|
$
|
19,813
|
|
$
|
52,324
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
$
|
52,324
|
|
$
|
7,965
|
|
$
|
17,833
|
|
$
|
42,456
|
|
||||
|
2018
|
$
|
42,456
|
|
$
|
20,992
|
|
$
|
18,708
|
|
$
|
44,740
|
|
||||
(1)
As a result of actual failure rates lower than expected, Ciena adjusted its fiscal 2017 provisions for warranty. These adjustments for previous fiscal year provisions had the effect of reducing warranty provisions by
$9.7 million
and
$5.3 million
for fiscal
2017
and
2016
respectively. During
fiscal 2018
, Ciena determined that failure rates for prior estimates remained unchanged, and accordingly did not make any adjustments for previous fiscal year provisions not yet settled. As a result, Ciena’s warranty provision for
fiscal 2018
increased as compared to these prior years.
93
As of the dates indicated, deferred revenue is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Products
|
$
|
42,474
|
|
$
|
49,135
|
|
|
|
Services
|
126,983
|
|
135,872
|
|
|||
|
|
169,457
|
|
185,007
|
|
|||
|
Less current portion
|
(111,134
|
)
|
(102,418
|
)
|
|||
|
Long-term deferred revenue
|
$
|
58,323
|
|
$
|
82,589
|
|
|
As of the dates indicated, other long-term obligations are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
October 31,
|
|||||||
|
2018
|
2017
|
||||||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
$
|
68,245
|
|
$
|
73,407
|
|
|
|
Income tax liability
|
15,894
|
|
15,445
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tenant allowance
|
7,244
|
|
8,162
|
|
|||
|
Straight-line rent
|
6,750
|
|
7,267
|
|
|||
|
Contingent consideration
|
10,900
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
10,380
|
|
7,068
|
|
|||
|
$
|
119,413
|
|
$
|
111,349
|
|
||
The following is a schedule by fiscal years of future minimum lease payments under capital leases and the present value of minimum lease payments as of
October 31, 2018
(in thousands):
|
Year Ending October 31,
|
Amount
|
||
|
2019
|
$
|
8,654
|
|
|
2020
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
2021
|
7,569
|
|
|
|
2022
|
7,883
|
|
|
|
2023
|
8,090
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
75,413
|
|
|
|
Net minimum capital lease payments
|
115,283
|
|
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
(43,491
|
)
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
71,792
|
|
|
|
Less: Current portion of present value of minimum lease payments
|
(3,547
|
)
|
|
|
Long-term portion of present value of minimum lease payments
|
$
|
68,245
|
|
|
(14)
|
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
|
Foreign Currency Derivatives
During
fiscal 2018
and
fiscal 2017
, Ciena entered into forward contracts to hedge its foreign exchange exposure from its forecasted cash flows in order to reduce the variability in its Canadian Dollar and Indian Rupee denominated expense, which principally relates to research and development activities, its British Pound denominated expense, which principally relates to sales and marketing activities, and its Euro denominated revenue. The notional amount of these contracts was approximately
$163.2 million
and
$86.1 million
as of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
, respectively. These foreign exchange contracts have maturities of
24
months or less and have been designated as cash flow hedges.
94
During
fiscal 2018
and fiscal
2017
, in order to hedge its foreign exchange exposure from certain balance sheet items, Ciena entered into forward contracts to mitigate risk due to volatility in the Brazilian Real, Canadian Dollar, Euro, Australian Dollar, British Pound Sterling, and Mexican Peso. The notional amount of these contracts was approximately
$162.6 million
and
$83.4 million
as of
October 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
. These foreign exchange contracts have maturities of
12
months or less and have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes.
Interest Rate Derivatives
Ciena is exposed to floating rates of LIBOR interest on its term loan borrowings (see Note
16
below) and has hedged such risk by entering into floating to fixed interest rate swap arrangements ("interest rate swaps"). During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Ciena refinanced its existing 2022 Term Loans into a new 2025 Term Loan, increasing the aggregate outstanding principal to
$700 million
and extending the maturity to September 2025 (see Note
16
below). In conjunction with the refinancing, Ciena unwound its existing interest rate swaps for a cash gain of $
6.8 million
, which was recorded in Other Comprehensive Income, and entered into new floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps. The new interest rate swaps fix the LIBOR rate of approximately
50%
of the principal amount of the 2025 Term Loan at
2.957%
through September 2023. The total notional amount of these interest rate swaps in effect as of
October 31, 2018
was
$350.0 million
.
Ciena expects the variable rate payments to be received under the terms of the interest rate swaps to offset exactly the forecasted variable rate payments on the equivalent notional amounts of the term loans. These derivative contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges.
Other information regarding Ciena’s derivatives is immaterial for separate financial statement presentation. See Notes
4
and
6
above.
Debt Conversion Liability Associated With
3.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (“New Notes”)
The New Notes provided Ciena the option, at its election, to settle conversions of such notes for cash, shares of its common stock, or a combination of cash and shares equal to the aggregate amount due upon conversion. On August 30, 2018, Ciena notified the noteholders that it had elected to settle conversion of the New Notes in a combination of cash and shares, provided that the cash portion would not exceed an aggregate amount of
$400 million
. Ciena became obligated to settle a portion of the conversion feature in cash and reclassified the cash conversion feature from equity to a derivative liability at its current fair value of
$152.1 million
. As of October 31, 2018, Ciena recorded a loss of approximately
$12.1 million
related to the change in fair value of the embedded conversion feature. On November 15, 2018, Ciena paid approximately
$111.3 million
in cash and issued
1.6 million
shares in settlement of this embedded conversion feature.
95
(15) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated balances of other comprehensive income (“AOCI”):
|
Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Available-for-Sale Securities
|
Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
|
Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Forward Starting Interest Rate Swaps
|
Cumulative Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2015
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
$
|
(268
|
)
|
$
|
(5,522
|
)
|
$
|
(16,258
|
)
|
$
|
(22,126
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassifications
|
217
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
(4,101
|
)
|
(1,152
|
)
|
(6,489
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
—
|
|
630
|
|
3,656
|
|
—
|
|
4,286
|
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2016
|
139
|
|
(1,091
|
)
|
(5,967
|
)
|
(17,410
|
)
|
(24,329
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassifications
|
(590
|
)
|
1,290
|
|
3,669
|
|
8,012
|
|
12,381
|
|
||||||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
—
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
2,516
|
|
—
|
|
931
|
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2017
|
(451
|
)
|
(1,386
|
)
|
218
|
|
(9,398
|
)
|
(11,017
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassifications
|
26
|
|
(3,242
|
)
|
6,011
|
|
686
|
|
3,481
|
|
||||||||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
—
|
|
1,568
|
|
188
|
|
—
|
|
1,756
|
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at October 31, 2018
|
$
|
(425
|
)
|
$
|
(3,060
|
)
|
$
|
6,417
|
|
$
|
(8,712
|
)
|
$
|
(5,780
|
)
|
|||||
All amounts reclassified from AOCI related to settlement (gains) losses on foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges impacted revenue, research and development expense or sales and marketing expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. All amounts reclassified from AOCI related to settlement (gains) losses on forward starting interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges impacted interest and other income (loss), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Outstanding Term Loan Payable
The net carrying values of Ciena’s term loans were comprised of the following for the fiscal periods indicated (in thousands):
|
October 31, 2018
|
October 31, 2017
|
|||||||
|
Term Loan Payable due January 30, 2022
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
392,972
|
|
||
|
Term Loan Payable due September 28, 2025
|
693,450
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
$
|
693,450
|
|
$
|
392,972
|
|
|||
Deferred debt issuance costs deducted from the carrying amounts of the term loans totaled
$4.3 million
at
October 31, 2018
and
$3.1 million
at
October 31, 2017
. Deferred debt issuance costs are amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the effect of the effective interest rate method, through the maturity of the term loans. The amortization of deferred debt issuance costs for these term loans is included in interest expense, and was
$0.7 million
and
$0.5 million
during fiscal
2018
and fiscal
2017
, respectively. The carrying values of the term loans listed above are also net of any unamortized debt discounts.
2025 Term Loan
96
On September 28, 2018, Ciena, as borrower, and Ciena Communications, Inc. and Ciena Government Solutions, Inc., as guarantors, entered into an Increase Joinder and Refinancing Amendment to Credit Agreement with the lenders party thereto and the Administrative Agent (the “Refinancing Agreement”), pursuant to which Ciena refinanced its existing 2022 Term Loan (as described under "2022 Term Loan" below) into a term loan with an aggregate principal amount of
$700 million
maturing on September 28, 2025 (the “2025 Term Loan”). In connection with the transaction, Ciena received a loan in the amount of
$699.1 million
, net of original discount, from the 2025 Term Loan and simultaneously repaid
$394.0 million
of outstanding principal under the 2022 Term Loan, resulting in proceeds of
$305.1 million
. The 2025 Term Loan requires Ciena to make installment payments of
$1.75 million
on a quarterly basis. Based on the continuation of existing lenders and the addition of new lenders, this arrangement was primarily accounted for as a modification of debt and, as such,
$3.8 million
of debt issuance costs associated with the 2025 Term Loan were expensed. The aggregate balance of
$2.4 million
of debt issuance costs and approximately
$1.4 million
of original discount from the 2022 Term Loan,
$1.9 million
of debt issuance costs associated with new lenders for the 2025 Term Loan, and approximately
$0.9 million
of original discount from the 2025 Term Loan, were included in the carrying value of the 2025 Term Loan.
The Refinancing Agreement amends the Term Loan Credit Agreement (as defined below) and provides that the 2025 Term Loan will, among other things:
|
•
|
amortize in equal quarterly installments in aggregate amounts equal to
0.25%
of the principal amount of the Refinancing Term Loan as of September 28, 2018, with the balance payable at maturity;
|
|
•
|
be subject to mandatory prepayment provisions upon the occurrence of certain specified events substantially similar to the Existing Term Loan, including certain asset sales, debt issuances and receipt of annual Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement);
|
|
•
|
bear interest, at Ciena’s election, at a per annum rate equal to (a) LIBOR (subject to a floor of
0.00%
) plus an applicable margin of
2.00%
, or (b) a base rate (subject to a floor of
1.00%
) plus an applicable margin of
1.00%
; and
|
|
•
|
be repayable at any time at Ciena’s election, provided that repayment of the 2025 Term Loan with proceeds of certain indebtedness prior to March 28, 2019 will require a prepayment premium of
1.00%
of the aggregate principal amount of such prepayment.
|
Except as amended by the Refinancing Agreement, the remaining terms of the Term Loan Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect.
The principal balance, unamortized debt discount, deferred debt issuance costs and net carrying value of Ciena’s 2025 Term Loan were as follows as of
October 31, 2018
(in thousands):
|
Principal Balance
|
Unamortized Discount
|
Deferred Debt Issuance Costs
|
Net Carrying Value
|
||||||||||||
|
Term Loan Payable due September 28, 2025
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
$
|
(2,300
|
)
|
$
|
(4,250
|
)
|
$
|
693,450
|
|
|||
The following table sets forth the carrying value and the estimated fair value of Ciena’s 2025 Term Loan (in thousands):
|
October 31, 2018
|
||||||||
|
Carrying Value
(1)
|
Fair Value
(2)
|
|||||||
|
Term Loan Payable due September 28, 2025
|
$
|
693,450
|
|
$
|
702,625
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs.
|
|
(2)
|
Ciena’s term loan is categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Ciena estimated the fair value of its 2025 Term Loan using a market approach based upon observable inputs, such as current market transactions involving comparable securities.
|
2022 Term Loan
97
On January 30, 2017 Ciena entered into an Omnibus Refinancing Amendment to the Credit Agreement, Security Agreement and Pledge Agreement (the “Refinancing Agreement”). The Refinancing Agreement refinanced prior term loans into a single term loan with an aggregate principal amount of
$400 million
(the “2022 Term Loan”). The 2022 Term Loan required Ciena to make installment payments of approximately
$1.0 million
on a quarterly basis.
Convertible Notes Payable
As of October 31, 2018, there were no outstanding convertible notes payable or principal amounts owing with respect thereto. The net carrying values of Ciena’s convertible notes payable was comprised of the following for the fiscal periods indicated (in thousands):
|
October 31, 2018
|
October 31, 2017
|
|||||||
|
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (Original)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
61,071
|
|
||
|
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (New)
|
—
|
|
287,221
|
|
||||
|
4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due December 15, 2020
|
—
|
|
194,717
|
|
||||
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
543,009
|
|
||
Deferred debt issuance costs that were deducted from the carrying amounts of the convertible notes payable totaled
$2.1 million
at October 31,
2017
, there are no deferred debt issuance costs attributed to convertible notes outstanding at October 31,
2018
. Deferred debt issuance costs are amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the effect of the effective interest rate method, through the maturity of the convertible notes payable. The amortization of deferred debt issuance costs for these convertible notes are included in interest expense, and were
$1.4 million
,
$1.8 million
and
$2.7 million
during fiscal
2018
, fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
, respectively. The carrying values of the term loans listed above as of October 31, 2017 are also net of any unamortized debt discounts.
3.75%
Convertible Senior Notes, due October 15, 2018
On October 18, 2010, Ciena completed a private placement of
3.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (the “Original Notes”), in aggregate principal amount of
$350.0 million
. At the election of the holder, the Original Notes were convertible prior to maturity into shares of Ciena common stock at a conversion rate of
49.5872
shares per
$1,000
in principal amount, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately
$20.17
per share. On August 2, 2017, Ciena completed an offer to exchange the Original Notes for a new series of
3.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (the “New Notes”) and an exchange fee of $2.50 per $1,000 original principal amount, or
$0.7 million
. Following settlement of the exchange,
$61.3 million
in aggregate principal amount at maturity of Original Notes and
$288.7 million
in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the New Notes were outstanding. Except with respect to the additional cash settlement option upon conversion, the New Notes were issued on substantially the same terms as the Original Notes including the holder conversion option and interest payment dates described above. Since the calculated fair value of the liability component was greater than the fair value of the New Notes,
the adjustment to equity for the cash conversion feature was immaterial. This arrangement was accounted for as a modification of debt and, as such, $0.7 million of debt issuance costs associated with the New Notes was expensed, and the aggregate balance of $1.2 million of debt issuance costs for the Old Notes and approximately $0.7 million of original discount from the New Notes were included in the carrying value of the New Notes.
Conversion of Original Notes
. Following conversion elections by the holders thereof, the Original Notes were converted in advance of maturity during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 and Ciena issued approximately
3.0 million
shares of its common stock in settlement of such conversion. The Original Notes thereafter ceased to be outstanding.
Conversion of New Notes.
The New Notes provided Ciena the option, at its election, to settle conversions of such notes for cash, shares of its common stock, or a combination of cash and shares equal to the aggregate amount due upon conversion.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Ciena elected to settle conversion of the New Notes in a combination of cash and shares, provided that the cash portion would not to exceed an aggregate amount of approximately
$400 million
. As a result of this election, Ciena became obligated to settle a portion of the conversion feature in cash and reclassified the cash conversion feature from equity to a derivative liability at its current fair value of
$152.1 million
. The embedded conversion feature was remeasured in earnings through period end and was settled on November 15, 2018. See Notes 14 and 25 for more information on this liability and settlement. Following conversion elections by the holders thereof, the New Notes were converted in advance of maturity during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 and Ciena paid an amount of $
288.7 million
in cash, representing the aggregate principal amount of the notes, on October 15, 2018. The New Notes principal thereafter ceased to be outstanding.
4.0%
Convertible Senior Notes due December 15, 2020
98
On December 27, 2012, Ciena issued
$187.5 million
in aggregate principal amount of
4.0%
Convertible Senior Notes due December 15, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”) in separate private offerings in exchange for
$187.5
million in aggregate principal amount of a then existing issue of convertible notes maturing in 2015. The principal amount of the 2020 Notes also accreted at a rate of
1.85%
per year commencing December 27, 2012, compounding on a semi-annual basis. The accreted portion of the principal payable at maturity did not bear interest and was not convertible into shares of Ciena’s common stock. The 2020 Notes were convertible prior to maturity, at the option of the holder, into shares of Ciena’s common stock at a conversion rate of
49.0557
shares of common stock per
$1,000
in original principal amount, which is equal to an initial conversion price of
$20.39
per share. In addition, the indenture provided that Ciena could elect to convert the 2020 Notes, in whole or in part, at any time on or prior to December 15, 2020, if the daily volume weighted average price of the common stock equals or exceeds
130%
of the conversion price then in effect for at least
20
trading days in any
30
consecutive trading day period, provided that upon such an election the conversion rate would be adjusted to include an amount of additional shares, determined by reference to a make-whole table, payable in Ciena common stock, or its cash equivalent. On September 20, 2018, Ciena elected to exercise its option to convert the entire principal amount outstanding into shares of Ciena common stock, with such conversion to occur on October 31, 2018 (the “Conversion Date”). Upon the Conversion Date, Ciena issued approximately
9.2 million
shares of its common stock and paid cash of $
13.5 million
, having elected to satisfy its additional make-whole share obligation in cash.
Accounting guidance issued by the FASB requires the issuer of convertible debt instruments with cash settlement features, including partial cash settlement, to account separately for the liability and equity components of the instrument. Under this guidance, the debt is recognized at the present value of its cash flows discounted using the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance, and the equity component is recognized as the difference between the proceeds from the issuance of the note and the fair value of the liability. The reduced carrying value on the convertible debt results in a debt discount that is accreted back to the convertible debt’s principal amount through the recognition of non-cash interest expense over the expected life of the debt, which results in recognizing the interest expense on these borrowings at effective rates approximating what Ciena would have incurred had nonconvertible debt with otherwise similar terms been issued.
Because the additional make-whole shares could be settled in cash or common stock at Ciena’s option, the debt and equity components were accounted for separately. Ciena measured the fair value of the debt component of the 2020 Notes using an effective interest rate of
7.0%
. As a result, Ciena attributed
$170.4
million of the fair value of the 2020 Notes to the debt component. The debt component was netted against the face value of the 2020 Notes to determine the debt discount. The debt discount was accreted over the period from the date of issuance to the contractual maturity date, resulting in the recognition of non-cash interest expense. In addition, Ciena recorded
$43.1 million
within additional paid-in capital representing the equity component of the 2020 Notes. There was
no
net tax expense recorded at that time due to Ciena’s full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.
Because the 2020 Notes contained both debt and equity elements as described above, Ciena allocated the fair value of the consideration transferred (cash and shares) between (i) the debt component to reflect the extinguishment of the debt and (ii) the equity component to reflect the reacquisition of the embedded conversion option. The fair value of the 2020 notes was calculated by Ciena immediately prior to its derecognition in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. Accordingly, Ciena recorded a
$9.9 million
loss on extinguishment of debt, representing the difference between the calculated fair value of the debt and the carrying amount of the debt component, including any unamortized debt discount or issuance costs. The remainder of the consideration was allocated to the reacquisition of the equity component.
(17) ABL CREDIT FACILITY
Ciena Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries are parties to a senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Credit Facility”) providing for a total commitment of
$250 million
with a maturity date of December 31, 2020. Ciena principally uses the ABL Credit Facility to support the issuance of letters of credit that arise in the ordinary course of its business and thereby to reduce its use of cash required to collateralize these instruments.
As of
October 31, 2018
, letters of credit totaling
$61.7 million
were collateralized by the ABL Credit Facility. There were
no
borrowings outstanding under the ABL Credit Facility as of
October 31, 2018
.
(18) EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE CALCULATION
The following table (in thousands except per share amounts) is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic net income (loss) per common share (“Basic EPS”) and the diluted net income (loss) per potential common share (“Diluted EPS”). Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average number of the following, in each case, to the extent the effect is not anti-dilutive: (i) common shares outstanding, (ii) shares issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units, (iii) shares issuable under Ciena’s
99
employee stock purchase plan and upon exercise of outstanding stock options, using the treasury stock method, (iv) shares underlying Ciena’s outstanding convertible notes for which Ciena uses the treasury stock method (New Notes), and (v) shares underlying Ciena’s outstanding convertible notes for which Ciena uses the if-converted method.
Numerator
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(344,690
|
)
|
$
|
1,261,953
|
|
$
|
72,584
|
|
||
|
Less: Loss on fair value of debt conversion liability
(1)
|
(12,894
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Add: Interest expense associated with 0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017
|
—
|
|
853
|
|
4,801
|
|
|||||
|
Add: Interest expense associated with 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (Original Notes)
|
—
|
|
7,224
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Add: Interest expense associated with 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020
|
—
|
|
8,691
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss) used to calculate Diluted EPS
|
$
|
(357,584
|
)
|
$
|
1,278,721
|
|
$
|
77,385
|
|
||
Denominator
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
143,738
|
|
141,997
|
|
138,312
|
|
||
|
Add: Shares underlying outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan and restricted stock units
|
—
|
|
1,354
|
|
1,311
|
|
||
|
Add: Shares underlying 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (New Notes)
|
—
|
|
404
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Add: Shares underlying 0.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017
|
—
|
|
3,032
|
|
11,081
|
|
||
|
Add: Shares underlying 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (Original Notes)
|
—
|
|
13,934
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Add: Shares underlying 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020
|
—
|
|
9,198
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
143,738
|
|
169,919
|
|
150,704
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
On October 15, 2018, we settled our New Notes with an aggregate principal amount of
$288.7 million
. It was our intent to settle the principal amount of the New Notes in cash; accordingly, the principal amount was excluded from the determination of diluted earnings per share. On August 21, 2018, we changed our policy and decided to settle the payment of the conversion premium in cash and stock; see Note 16 above. Prior to this change, for EPS purposes we accounted for the conversion feature using the treasury stock method by adjusting the diluted weighted-average common shares if the effect was dilutive. As a consequence of our change in policy described above, the numerator for the computation of diluted earnings per common share was adjusted for any dilutive changes in the estimated value of the debt conversion liability during the period of August 20, 2018 through August 30, 2018, the date at which we began to account for the conversion feature as a derivative. There were no adjustments to diluted weighted average shares outstanding subsequent to our change in policy. See Note 14 above. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018, the adjustment to the numerator had the effect of reducing the diluted earnings per share by
$0.09
.
|
EPS
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
Basic EPS
|
$
|
(2.40
|
)
|
$
|
8.89
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
||
|
Diluted EPS
|
$
|
(2.49
|
)
|
$
|
7.53
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
||
The following table summarizes the weighted average shares excluded from the calculation of the denominator for Diluted EPS due to their anti-dilutive effect for the fiscal years indicated (in thousands):
100
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||
|
Shares underlying stock options and restricted stock units
|
2,235
|
|
958
|
|
1,882
|
|
|||
|
Add: Shares underlying 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (New Notes)
|
1,780
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (Original Notes)
|
2,883
|
|
—
|
|
17,355
|
|
|||
|
4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due December 15, 2020
|
9,123
|
|
—
|
|
9,198
|
|
|||
|
Total shares excluded due to anti-dilutive effect
|
16,021
|
|
958
|
|
28,435
|
|
|||
(19) STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stock Repurchase Program
On December 7, 2017, Ciena announced that its Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to
$300 million
of Ciena’s common stock. A summary of the stock repurchase program, reported based on trade date, is summarized as follows:
|
|
Shares Repurchased
|
Weighted-Average Price per Share
|
Amount Repurchased (in thousands)
|
|||||||
|
Cumulative balance at October 31, 2017
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Repurchase of common stock under the stock repurchase program
|
4,290,801
|
|
25.86
|
|
110,981
|
|
||||
|
Cumulative balance at October 31, 2018
|
4,290,801
|
|
$
|
25.86
|
|
$
|
110,981
|
|
||
The purchase price for the shares of Ciena’s stock repurchased is reflected as a reduction of common stock and additional paid-in capital.
Stock Repurchases Related to Restricted Stock Unit Tax Withholdings
Historically, Ciena satisfied employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of stock unit awards through directed open market sales. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Ciena changed this practice to begin the repurchase of shares of common stock delivered with respect to such stock units in settlement of employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of such awards. The purchase price of
$4.8 million
for the shares of Ciena’s stock repurchased is reflected as a reduction to stockholders’ equity. Ciena is required to allocate the purchase price of the repurchased shares as a reduction of common stock and additional paid-in capital.
(20) INCOME TAXES
For the periods indicated, the provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Current:
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
8,327
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
|
State
|
8,219
|
|
6,342
|
|
5,281
|
|
||||||
|
Foreign
|
13,294
|
|
14,563
|
|
9,969
|
|
||||||
|
Total current
|
29,840
|
|
20,905
|
|
15,250
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred:
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Federal
|
475,951
|
|
(1)
|
(1,047,699
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||
|
State
|
(8,202
|
)
|
(77,429
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Foreign
|
(4,118
|
)
|
(1,604
|
)
|
(1,116
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total deferred
|
463,631
|
|
(1,126,732
|
)
|
(1,116
|
)
|
||||||
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
$
|
493,471
|
|
$
|
(1,105,827
|
)
|
$
|
14,134
|
|
|||
_________________________________
101
(1) The income tax expense for 2018 includes the impact of the remeasurement of the net deferred tax assets and the federal transition tax. See further discussion below. The income tax benefit for fiscal 2017 includes the reversal of a significant portion of the valuation allowance on Ciena’s deferred tax assets in the U.S. as described below.
For the periods indicated, income before provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
106,972
|
|
$
|
114,242
|
|
$
|
58,237
|
|
||
|
Foreign
|
41,809
|
|
41,884
|
|
28,481
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
148,781
|
|
$
|
156,126
|
|
$
|
86,718
|
|
||
Ciena’s foreign income tax as a percentage of foreign income may appear disproportionate compared to the expected tax based on the U.S. federal statutory rate and is dependent upon the mix of earnings and tax rates in foreign jurisdictions.
For the periods indicated, the tax provision (benefit) reconciles to the amount computed by multiplying income before income taxes by the U.S. federal statutory rate of
35%
(
23.41%
for fiscal 2018, see note below) as follows:
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Provision at statutory rate
|
23.41
|
%
|
35.00
|
%
|
35.00
|
%
|
||
|
Deferred tax assets remeasurement
|
294.56
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
||
|
State taxes
|
(0.16
|
)%
|
2.29
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
||
|
Foreign taxes
|
1.22
|
%
|
(0.35
|
)%
|
3.11
|
%
|
||
|
Research and development credit
|
(8.80
|
)%
|
(15.38
|
)%
|
(22.61
|
)%
|
||
|
Non-deductible compensation
|
3.39
|
%
|
3.45
|
%
|
5.16
|
%
|
||
|
Fair value of debt conversion liability
|
1.90
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
||
|
Transition tax
|
23.23
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(11.95
|
)%
|
(739.97
|
)%
|
(7.33
|
)%
|
||
|
Other
|
4.88
|
%
|
6.67
|
%
|
(1.03
|
)%
|
||
|
Effective income tax rate
|
331.68
|
%
|
(708.29
|
)%
|
16.30
|
%
|
||
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted. The Tax Act significantly revises the U.S. corporate income tax by, among other things, lowering the statutory corporate income tax rate (the “federal tax rate”) from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, implementing a modified territorial tax system, and imposing a mandatory one-time transition tax on accumulated earnings of foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred. As a fiscal-year taxpayer, certain provisions of the Tax Act impact Ciena in fiscal 2018, including the change in the federal tax rate and the one-time transition tax, while other provisions will be effective at the beginning of fiscal 2019, including the implementation of a modified territorial tax system, other changes to how foreign earnings are subject to U.S. tax, and adoption of an alternative tax system.
As a result of the decrease in the federal tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, Ciena has computed its income tax expense for the October 31, 2018 fiscal year using a blended federal tax rate of
23.41%
. Ciena remeasured its deferred tax assets and liabilities (“DTA”) using the federal tax rate that will apply when the related temporary differences are expected to reverse.
During fiscal 2018, Ciena recorded a tax expense of
$493.5 million
, primarily related to the Tax Act which consists of the following:
|
•
|
a
$438.2 million
charge related to the remeasurement of U.S. net deferred tax assets at the lower statutory rate under the Tax Act; and
|
|
•
|
a
$34.6 million
charge related to a transition tax on accumulated historical foreign earnings and its deemed repatriation to the U.S.
|
In December 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which addresses how a company recognizes provisional amounts when it does not have the necessary information available, prepared or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete its accounting for the effect of the changes due to the Tax Act. The measurement period ends
102
when a company has obtained, prepared and analyzed the information necessary to finalize its accounting, but cannot extend beyond one year. The final impact of the Tax Act may differ from the above amounts to the extent they are provisional due to changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, changes in accounting standards for income taxes and related interpretations in response to the Tax Act, and any updates or changes to estimates used in the provisional amounts. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Ciena recorded a
$10.5 million
benefit to the provisional amounts originally recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 related to the U.S transition tax on accumulated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. Ciena has determined that the
$34.6 million
of tax expense for the U.S. transition tax on accumulated earnings of foreign subsidiaries is a provisional amount and a reasonable estimate as of October 31, 2018. Ciena is able to reduce the transition tax payable through the utilization of research and development credits which previously had a valuation allowance. The net transition tax payable is
$8.6 million
. Ciena has further determined that the
$438.2 million
of tax expense for DTA remeasurement is complete. Ciena is also required to make accounting policy elections as a result of the Tax Act. These include whether a valuation allowance is recorded for the estimated effect of the application of GILTI and BEAT or if these will be treated as period costs when incurred. Ciena has made an accounting policy election to record an
$8.6 million
provisional valuation allowance against the U.S. NOL due to an anticipated incremental cash tax cost projected to be generated by the new GILTI tax rules that begin to apply to Ciena in fiscal 2019. Ciena’s analysis of the new BEAT rules, as well as the very recent regulatory guidance and how they may impact the company, continue to progress. Accordingly, Ciena has not made an accounting policy election on whether to establish a valuation allowance for the estimated impact for BEAT. Ciena is also required to elect to either treat taxes due on future GILTI inclusions in U.S. taxable income as a current period expense when incurred or reflect such portion of the future GILTI inclusions in U.S. taxable income that relate to existing basis differences in Ciena’s current measurement of deferred taxes. Ciena’s accounting policy election is to treat the taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income under GILTI as a period cost when incurred.
The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
||||||
|
Reserves and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
40,959
|
|
$
|
56,597
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
353,838
|
|
451,385
|
|
|||
|
NOL and credit carry forward
|
483,495
|
|
803,622
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
9,397
|
|
29,398
|
|
|||
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
887,689
|
|
1,341,002
|
|
|||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(142,650
|
)
|
(185,898
|
)
|
|||
|
Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance
|
$
|
745,039
|
|
$
|
1,155,104
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows (in thousands):
|
Amount
|
|||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at October 31, 2015
|
$
|
27,536
|
|
|
Increase related to positions taken in prior period
|
2,187
|
|
|
|
Increase related to positions taken in current period
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
Reductions related to expiration of statute of limitations
|
(1,709
|
)
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at October 31, 2016
|
30,668
|
|
|
|
Increase related to positions taken in prior period
|
122
|
|
|
|
Increase related to positions taken in current period
|
111,412
|
|
|
|
Reductions related to expiration of statute of limitations
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at October 31, 2017
|
141,582
|
|
|
|
Decrease related to positions taken in prior period
|
(46,400
|
)
|
|
|
Increase related to positions taken in current period
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
Reductions related to expiration of statute of limitations
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at October 31, 2018
|
$
|
96,363
|
|
103
As of
October 31, 2018
and
2017
, Ciena had accrued
$3.5 million
and
$4.0 million
of interest and penalties, respectively, related to unrecognized tax benefits within other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Interest and penalties of
$1.1 million
and
$1.2 million
were recorded to the provision for income taxes during
fiscal 2018
and
fiscal 2016
, respectively. During fiscal 2017, Ciena recorded a net benefit for interest and penalties in its provision for income taxes of
$0.6 million
, primarily as a result of recognizing a portion of previously unrecognized tax benefits. If recognized, the entire balance of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate. Over the next 12 months, Ciena does not estimate any material changes in unrecognized income tax benefits.
Ciena has not provided for U.S. deferred income taxes on the cumulative unremitted earnings of its non-U.S. affiliates, as it plans to indefinitely reinvest these foreign earnings outside the U.S. As of October 31, 2018, the cumulative amount of such temporary differences for which a deferred tax liability has not been recognized is an estimated
$336 million
. If these earnings were distributed to the U.S., Ciena would be subject to additional foreign withholding taxes of approximately
$23.0 million
. Additionally, there are no other significant temporary differences for which a deferred tax liability has not been recognized.
As of
October 31, 2018
, Ciena continues to maintain a valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets of
$142.7 million
primarily related to state and foreign net operating losses and credits that Ciena estimates it will not be able to use.
The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s valuation allowance against its gross deferred tax assets (in thousands):
|
Year ended
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||
|
October 31,
|
Balance
|
Additions
|
Deductions
|
Balance
|
||||||||||||
|
2016
|
$
|
1,495,672
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
5,892
|
|
$
|
1,489,780
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
$
|
1,489,780
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,303,882
|
|
$
|
185,898
|
|
||||
|
2018
|
$
|
185,898
|
|
$
|
23,720
|
|
$
|
66,968
|
|
$
|
142,650
|
|
||||
As of
October 31, 2018
, Ciena had a
$1.27 billion
net operating loss carry forward and a
$0.1 billion
income tax credit carry forward which both begin to expire in fiscal year 2021. Ciena’s ability to use net operating losses and credit carry forwards is subject to limitations pursuant to the ownership change rules of the Internal Revenue Code Section 382.
Ciena adopted ASU 2016-09,
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,
in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. In connection with the adoption of this guidance, Ciena recognized approximately
$62.1 million
of deferred tax assets related to previously unrecognized tax benefits. This was recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2018.
(21) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE
Ciena has outstanding equity awards issued under its 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan"), its 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and certain legacy equity plans and equity plans assumed as a result of previous acquisitions. All equity awards granted on or after March 23, 2017 are made exclusively from the 2017 Plan. Ciena also makes shares of its common stock available for purchase under its Amended and Restated 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"). Each of the 2017 Plan and the ESPP are described below.
2017 Plan
The 2017 Plan has a
ten
-year term and authorizes the issuance of awards including stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), restricted stock, unrestricted stock, stock appreciation rights (SARs) and other equity and/or cash performance incentive awards to employees, directors and consultants of Ciena. Subject to certain restrictions, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has broad discretion to establish the terms and conditions for awards under the 2017 Plan, including the number of shares, vesting conditions, and the required service or performance criteria. Options and SARs have a maximum term of
ten
years, and their exercise price may not be less than
100%
of fair market value on the date of grant. Repricing of stock options and SARs is prohibited without stockholder approval. Certain change in control transactions may cause awards granted under the 2017 Plan to vest, unless the awards are continued or substituted for in connection with the transaction.
The 2017 Plan authorizes and reserves
8.9 million
shares for issuance. In addition, any shares that remained available for issuance under the 2008 Plan as of March 23, 2017 were added to the 2017 Plan and are available for issuance thereunder. The number of shares available under the 2017 Plan will also be increased from time to time by: (i) the number of shares subject to outstanding awards granted under Ciena’s prior equity compensation plans that are forfeited, expire or are canceled without delivery of common stock following the effective date of the 2017 Plan, and (ii) the number of shares subject to awards assumed or substituted in connection with the acquisition of another company. As of
October 31, 2018
, the total number of
104
shares authorized for issuance under the 2017 Plan is
8.9 million
and approximately
7.2 million
shares remained available for issuance thereunder.
Stock Options
There were
no
stock options granted by Ciena during
fiscal 2018
, fiscal
2017
or fiscal 2016. Outstanding stock option awards granted to employees in prior periods are generally subject to service-based vesting conditions and vest over a
four
-year period. The following table is a summary of Ciena’s stock option activity for the periods indicated (shares in thousands):
|
Shares Underlying
Options
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||
|
Balance as of October 31, 2017
|
875
|
|
$
|
30.19
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Exercised
|
(179
|
)
|
12.75
|
|
||
|
Canceled
|
(420
|
)
|
35.46
|
|
||
|
Balance as of October 31, 2018
|
276
|
|
$
|
33.52
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal
2018
, fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
was
$2.2 million
,
$3.1 million
and
$5.7 million
, respectively.
The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding at
October 31, 2018
, based on Ciena’s closing stock price on the last trading day of Ciena’s fiscal
2018
(shares and intrinsic value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding at
|
Vested Options at
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
October 31, 2018
|
October 31, 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
|
Weighted
|
Number
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Range of
|
of
|
Contractual
|
Average
|
Aggregate
|
of
|
Contractual
|
Average
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exercise
|
Underlying
|
Life
|
Exercise
|
Intrinsic
|
Underlying
|
Life
|
Exercise
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Price
|
Shares
|
(Years)
|
Price
|
Value
|
Shares
|
(Years)
|
Price
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$
|
5.34
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
11.16
|
|
14
|
|
1.31
|
$
|
8.30
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
14
|
|
1.31
|
$
|
8.30
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|||||||||
|
$
|
11.34
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
16.79
|
|
64
|
|
3.63
|
13.53
|
|
1,191
|
|
64
|
|
3.62
|
13.52
|
|
1,185
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
$
|
17.50
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
25.36
|
|
11
|
|
5.6
|
18.44
|
|
156
|
|
11
|
|
5.55
|
18.21
|
|
151
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
$
|
32.06
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
37.10
|
|
54
|
|
3.97
|
35.60
|
|
—
|
|
54
|
|
3.97
|
35.60
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
$
|
37.82
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
55.63
|
|
133
|
|
4.59
|
46.29
|
|
—
|
|
132
|
|
4.59
|
46.29
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
$
|
5.34
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
55.63
|
|
276
|
|
4.13
|
$
|
33.52
|
|
$
|
1,670
|
|
275
|
|
4.12
|
$
|
33.56
|
|
$
|
1,659
|
|
|||||||||
Assumptions for Option-Based Awards
Ciena recognizes the fair value of stock options as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Ciena did not grant any option-based awards during fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017, or fiscal 2016.
Restricted Stock Units
A restricted stock unit is a stock award that entitles the holder to receive shares of Ciena common stock as the unit vests. Ciena’s outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. Awards subject to service-based conditions typically vest in increments over a
three
or
four
-year period. However, the 2017 Plan permits Ciena to grant service-based stock awards with a minimum
one
-year vesting period. Awards with performance-based vesting conditions (i) require the achievement of certain operational, financial or other performance criteria or targets; or (ii) measure Ciena’s total shareholder return as compared to an index of peer companies, a condition of vesting of such awards, in whole or in part. Ciena recognizes the estimated fair value of performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based compensation expense over the performance period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, based upon Ciena’s determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At the end of each reporting period, Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets.
105
The following table is a summary of Ciena’s restricted stock unit activity for the period indicated, with the aggregate fair value of the balance outstanding at the end of each period, based on Ciena’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the relevant period (shares and aggregate fair value in thousands):
|
Restricted
Stock Units
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
|
Aggregate Fair
Value
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of October 31, 2017
|
4,143
|
|
$
|
21.46
|
|
$
|
86,721
|
|
||
|
Granted
|
2,713
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Vested
|
(2,155
|
)
|
|
|
||||||
|
Canceled or forfeited
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
||||||
|
Balance as of October 31, 2018
|
4,402
|
|
$
|
22.26
|
|
$
|
140,943
|
|
||
The total fair value of restricted stock units that vested and were converted into common stock during fiscal
2018
, fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
was
$54.3 million
,
$49.5 million
and
$50.3 million
, respectively. The weighted average fair value of each restricted stock unit granted by Ciena during fiscal
2018
, fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
was
$22.46
,
$23.29
and
$19.81
, respectively.
Assumptions for Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The fair value of each restricted stock unit award is based on the closing price on the date of grant. Share-based expense for service-based restricted stock unit awards is recognized ratably over the vesting period on a straight-line basis.
Share-based expense for performance-based restricted stock unit awards is recognized ratably over the performance period based upon Ciena’s determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets. The estimation of whether the performance targets will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of expense is revised periodically based on the probability of achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized against that goal and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation expense is reversed.
Share-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest. In the event of a forfeiture of an award, the expense related to the unvested portion of that award is reversed. Reversal of share-based compensation expense based on forfeitures can materially affect the measurement of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation.
Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)
Under the ESPP, eligible employees may enroll in a
twelve
-month offer period that begins in December and June of each year. Each offer period includes
two
six
-month purchase periods. Employees may purchase a limited number of shares of Ciena common stock at
85%
of the fair market value on either the day immediately preceding the offer date or the purchase date, whichever is lower. The ESPP is considered compensatory for purposes of share-based compensation expense. Pursuant to the ESPP’s “evergreen” provision, on December 31 of each year, the number of shares available under the ESPP increases by up to
0.6 million
shares, provided that the total number of shares available at that time shall not exceed
8.2 million
. Unless earlier terminated, the ESPP will terminate on
January 24, 2023
.
During fiscal
2018
, fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
, Ciena issued
1.1 million
,
1.0 million
and
1.1 million
shares under the ESPP, respectively. At
October 31,
2018
,
4.9 million
shares remained available for issuance under the ESPP.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense for the periods indicated (in thousands):
106
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
Product cost of goods sold
|
$
|
2,984
|
|
$
|
2,672
|
|
$
|
2,457
|
|
||
|
Service cost of goods sold
|
2,616
|
|
2,487
|
|
2,479
|
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation expense included in cost of goods sold
|
5,600
|
|
5,159
|
|
4,936
|
|
|||||
|
Research and development
|
13,518
|
|
12,957
|
|
13,870
|
|
|||||
|
Sales and marketing
|
14,246
|
|
12,846
|
|
15,138
|
|
|||||
|
General and administrative
|
19,709
|
|
17,321
|
|
17,342
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition and integration costs
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
714
|
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation expense included in operating expense
|
47,473
|
|
43,124
|
|
47,064
|
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation expense capitalized in inventory, net
|
(101
|
)
|
77
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total share-based compensation
|
$
|
52,972
|
|
$
|
48,360
|
|
$
|
51,993
|
|
||
As of
October 31, 2018
, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense was
$77.3 million
which relates to unvested restricted stock units and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.45
years.
(22) SEGMENT AND ENTITY WIDE DISCLOSURES
Segment Reporting
Ciena manages its business, measures its performance and allocates its resources based on the following operating segments:
|
•
|
Networking Platforms
reflects sales of Ciena’s Converged Packet Optical and Packet Networking product lines
.
|
|
◦
|
Converged Packet Optical
—
includes the 6500 Packet-Optical Platform, the 5430 Reconfigurable Switching System, Waveserver® stackable interconnect system, the family of CoreDirector® Multiservice Optical Switches and the OTN configuration for the 5410 Reconfigurable Switching System. This product line also includes sales of the Z-Series Packet-Optical Platform. As of the first quarter of fiscal 2018, sales of Optical Transport products are also reflected within the Converged Packet Optical product line for all periods presented.
|
|
◦
|
Packet Networking
—
includes the 3000 family of service delivery switches and service aggregation switches and the 5000 family of service aggregation switches. This product line also includes the 8700 Packetwave Platform, the Ethernet packet configuration for the 5410 Service Aggregation Switch, and the 6500 Packet Transport System (PTS), which combines packet switching, control plane operation, and integrated optics.
|
The Networking Platforms segment also includes sales of operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in each of the product lines above. Revenue from this segment is included in product revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
•
Software and Software-Related Services
reflects sales of the following:
|
◦
|
Ciena’s Blue Planet Automation Software and Services, which is a comprehensive, open software suite that allows customers to use enhanced knowledge about their network to drive adaptive optimization of their services and operations. Ciena’s Blue Planet Automation Platform includes multi-domain service orchestration (MDSO), network function virtualization (NFV), management and orchestration (NFV MANO), analytics, network health predictor (NHP), route optimization and assurance (ROA), inventory management and Ciena’s SDN Multilayer Controller and virtual wide area network (V-WAN) application. Ciena acquired the NHP and ROA software solutions as a part of its acquisition of Packet Design. Ciena acquired the inventory management and ROA software solutions from DonRiver and Packet Design, respectively. Services includes sales of subscription, installation, support, consulting and design services related to Ciena’s Blue Planet Automation Platform.
|
|
◦
|
Ciena’s Platform Software and Services, which provides analytics, data, and planning tools to assist customers in managing Ciena’s Networking Platforms products in their networks. Ciena’s platform software includes its Manage, Control and Plan (MCP) domain controller solution, OneControl Unified Management System, ON-Center® Network and Service Management Suite, Ethernet Services Manager, Optical Suite Release and Planet Operate. As Ciena seeks further adoption of its MCP software platform and transitions features, functionality and customers to this platform, Ciena expects revenue declines for its other platform software solutions. Software-related services includes sales of subscription, installation, support, and
|
107
consulting services related to Ciena’s software platforms and operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in each of the Networking Platforms product lines above.
Revenue from the software portions of this segment is included in product revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Revenue from services portions of this segment is included in services revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
•
|
Global Services
reflects sales of a broad range of Ciena’s services for consulting and network design, installation and deployment, maintenance support and training activities. Revenue from this segment is included in services revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
|
Ciena’s long-lived assets, including equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, finite-lived intangible assets, and maintenance spares, are not reviewed by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources. As of
October 31, 2018
, equipment, building, furniture and fixtures totaling
$292.1 million
primarily supports asset groups within Ciena’s Networking Platforms and Software and Software-Related Services segments and Ciena’s unallocated selling and general and administrative activities. As of
October 31, 2018
,
$29.7 million
of Ciena’s intangible assets were assigned to asset groups within Ciena’s Networking Platforms segment and
$118.5 million
of Ciena’s intangible assets were assigned to asset groups within Ciena’s Software and Software-Related Services segment. As of
October 31, 2018
, all of the maintenance spares totaling
$45.7 million
were assigned to asset groups within Ciena’s Global Services segment.
Segment Revenue
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth Ciena’s segment revenue for the respective periods indicated:
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|
||||||||||
|
Networking Platforms
|
|||||||||||
|
Converged Packet Optical
|
$
|
2,194,519
|
|
$
|
1,939,621
|
|
$
|
1,815,921
|
|
||
|
Packet Networking
|
283,499
|
|
313,089
|
|
252,862
|
|
|||||
|
Total Networking Platforms
|
2,478,018
|
|
2,252,710
|
|
2,068,783
|
|
|||||
|
Software and Software-Related Services
|
|||||||||||
|
Platform Software and Services
|
173,949
|
|
145,009
|
|
117,251
|
|
|||||
|
Blue Planet Automation Software and Services
|
26,764
|
|
16,110
|
|
7,818
|
|
|||||
|
Total Software and Software-Related Services
|
200,713
|
|
161,119
|
|
125,069
|
|
|||||
|
Global Services
|
|||||||||||
|
Maintenance Support and Training
|
245,161
|
|
227,400
|
|
228,982
|
|
|||||
|
Installation and Deployment
|
128,829
|
|
117,524
|
|
130,916
|
|
|||||
|
Consulting and Network Design
|
41,565
|
|
42,934
|
|
46,823
|
|
|||||
|
Total Global Services
|
415,555
|
|
387,858
|
|
406,721
|
|
|||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
3,094,286
|
|
$
|
2,801,687
|
|
$
|
2,600,573
|
|
||
Segment Profit
Segment profit is determined based on internal performance measures used by Ciena’s chief executive officer to assess the performance of each operating segment in a given period. In connection with that assessment, the chief executive officer excludes the following items: selling and marketing costs; general and administrative costs; amortization of intangible assets; acquisition and integration costs; significant asset impairments and restructuring costs, interest and other income (loss), net; interest expense; loss on extinguishment of debt; and provision (benefit) for income taxes.
The table below (in thousands) sets forth Ciena’s segment profit and the reconciliation to consolidated net income during the respective periods indicated:
108
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
Segment profit:
|
|
||||||||||
|
Networking Platforms
|
$
|
581,113
|
|
$
|
578,039
|
|
$
|
544,744
|
|
||
|
Software and Software-Related Services
|
69,808
|
|
32,536
|
|
7,123
|
|
|||||
|
Global Services
|
172,205
|
|
159,882
|
|
157,915
|
|
|||||
|
Total segment profit
|
823,126
|
|
770,457
|
|
709,782
|
|
|||||
|
Less: non-performance operating expenses
|
|
||||||||||
|
Selling and marketing
|
394,060
|
|
356,169
|
|
349,731
|
|
|||||
|
General and administrative
|
160,133
|
|
142,604
|
|
132,828
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
15,737
|
|
33,029
|
|
61,508
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition and integration costs
|
5,111
|
|
—
|
|
4,613
|
|
|||||
|
Significant asset impairments and restructuring costs
|
18,139
|
|
23,933
|
|
4,933
|
|
|||||
|
Add: other non-performance financial items
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest and other income (loss), net
|
(12,029
|
)
|
913
|
|
(12,569
|
)
|
|||||
|
Interest expense
|
(55,249
|
)
|
(55,852
|
)
|
(56,656
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
|
(13,887
|
)
|
(3,657
|
)
|
(226
|
)
|
|||||
|
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
493,471
|
|
(1,105,827
|
)
|
14,134
|
|
|||||
|
Total net income (loss)
|
$
|
(344,690
|
)
|
$
|
1,261,953
|
|
$
|
72,584
|
|
||
Entity Wide Reporting
Ciena’s operating segments each engage in business across
four
geographic regions: North America; Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”); Asia-Pacific (“APAC”); and Caribbean and Latin America (“CALA”). North America includes only activities in the United States and Canada. The following table reflects Ciena’s geographic distribution of revenue principally based on the relevant location for Ciena’s delivery of products and performance of services. For the periods below, Ciena’s geographic distribution of revenue was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
1,886,450
|
|
$
|
1,736,047
|
|
$
|
1,689,263
|
|
||
|
EMEA
|
464,876
|
|
404,099
|
|
393,705
|
|
|||||
|
CALA
|
140,177
|
|
164,308
|
|
195,085
|
|
|||||
|
APAC
|
602,783
|
|
497,233
|
|
322,520
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
3,094,286
|
|
$
|
2,801,687
|
|
$
|
2,600,573
|
|
||
North America includes
$1.77 billion
,
$1.63 billion
and
$1.58 billion
of United States revenue for fiscal years ended
October 31, 2018
,
2017
and
2016
, respectively. No other country accounted for at least 10% of total revenue for the periods presented above.
The following table reflects Ciena’s geographic distribution of equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, net, with any country accounting for at least 10% of total equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, net, specifically identified. Equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, net, attributable to geographic regions outside of the United States and Canada are reflected as “Other International.” For the periods below, Ciena’s geographic distribution of equipment, building, furniture and fixtures, net, was as follows (in thousands):
109
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Canada
|
$
|
198,028
|
|
$
|
203,491
|
|
|
|
United States
|
75,479
|
|
90,482
|
|
|||
|
Other International
|
18,560
|
|
14,492
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
292,067
|
|
$
|
308,465
|
|
|
While we have benefited from the diversification of our business and customer base, our ten largest customers contributed
56.5%
of
fiscal 2018
revenue,
55.6%
of
fiscal 2017
revenue and
51.1%
of
fiscal 2016
revenue.
For the periods below, customers accounting for at least
10%
of Ciena’s revenue were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
October 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
AT&T
|
$
|
374,576
|
|
$
|
448,943
|
|
$
|
479,077
|
|
||
|
Verizon
|
318,013
|
|
288,048
|
|
n/a
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
692,589
|
|
$
|
736,991
|
|
$
|
479,077
|
|
||
________________________________
|
n/a
|
Denotes revenue representing less than 10% of total revenue for the period
|
Both customers purchased products and services from each of Ciena’s operating segments.
(23) OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Ciena has a Defined Contribution Pension Plan that covers a majority of its Canada-based employees. The plan covers all Canada-based employees who are not part of an excluded group. Total contributions (employee and employer) cannot exceed the lesser of
18%
of participant earnings and an annual dollar limit (CAD
$26,230
(approximately
$34,364
) for
2018
). This plan includes a required employer contribution of
1%
for all participants and a
50%
matching of participant contributions up to a total annual maximum of CAD
$3,000
(approximately
$3,930
) per employee. During fiscal
2018
,
2017
and
2016
, Ciena made matching contributions of approximately CAD
$5.1 million
(approximately
$6.7 million
), CAD
$4.7 million
(approximately
$6.2 million
) and CAD
$4.5 million
(approximately
$5.9 million
), respectively.
Ciena has a 401(k) defined contribution profit sharing plan. Participants may contribute up to
60%
of pre-tax compensation, subject to certain limitations. The plan includes an employer matching contribution equal to
50%
of the first
6%
an employee contributes each pay period. Ciena may also make discretionary annual profit contributions up to the IRS regulated limit. Ciena has made
no
profit sharing contributions to date. During fiscal
2018
,
2017
and
2016
, Ciena made matching contributions of approximately
$5.8 million
,
$5.7 million
and
$5.4 million
, respectively.
(24) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Canadian Grant
During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, Ciena entered into agreements related to the Evolution of Networking Services through a Corridor in Quebec and Ontario for Research and Innovation (“ENCQOR”) project with the Canadian federal government, the government of the province of Ontario and the government of the province of Quebec to develop a 5G technology corridor between Quebec and Ontario to promote research and development, small business enterprises and entrepreneurs in Canada. Under these agreements, Ciena can receive up to an aggregate CAD$
57.6 million
(approximately
$45.0 million
) in reimbursement from the
three
Canadian government entities for eligible costs over a period commencing on February 20, 2017 and ending on March 31, 2022. Ciena anticipates receiving recurring disbursements over this period. Amounts received under the agreements are subject to recoupment in the event that Ciena fails to achieve certain minimum investment, employment and project milestones. During
fiscal 2018
, Ciena recorded a CAD$
16.6 million
(approximately $
12.9 million
) benefit as a reduction in research and development expense, related to eligible costs that it incurred from the commencement date of February 20, 2017 to
October 31, 2018
, because it believes it has complied with the conditions of the agreements entitling it to this amount. In future periods, through the term of these agreements, Ciena expects to record a quarterly benefit to operating expense of approximately CAD$
2.95 million
(approximately
$2.3 million
) related to these grants. As of
October 31, 2018
, amounts receivable from this grant were CAD$
7.5 million
(approximately
$5.7 million
).
110
Foreign Tax Contingencies
Ciena is subject to various tax liabilities arising in the ordinary course of business. Ciena does not expect that the ultimate settlement of these liabilities will have a material effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Litigation
As a result of the acquisition of Cyan in August 2015, Ciena became a defendant in a securities class action lawsuit. On April 1, 2014, the first of two purported stockholder class action lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, against Cyan, the members of Cyan’s board of directors, Cyan’s former Chief Financial Officer, and the underwriters of Cyan’s initial public offering. The cases were consolidated as Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, et al. v. Cyan, Inc. et al., Case No. CGC-14-538355. The consolidated complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws on behalf of a purported class consisting of purchasers of Cyan’s common stock pursuant or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus for Cyan’s initial public offering in April 2013, and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and other relief. On May 19, 2015, the proposed class was certified. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the parties agreed to the terms of a settlement of the action, which settlement is subject to notice to class members and approval by the court. The terms of the proposed settlement, which include a release and dismissal of all claims against all defendants without any liability or wrongdoing attributed to them, are not material to the Company’s financial results. There is no assurance that the court will ultimately approve the settlement.
Internal Investigation
During fiscal 2017, one of Ciena’s third-party vendors raised allegations about certain questionable payments to one or more individuals employed by a customer in a country in the ASEAN region. Ciena promptly initiated an internal investigation into the matter, with the assistance of outside counsel, which investigation corroborated direct and indirect payments to one such individual and sought to determine whether the payments may have violated applicable laws and regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). In September 2017, Ciena voluntarily contacted the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to advise them of the relevant events and the findings of Ciena’s internal investigation. On December 10, 2018, the DOJ advised that it has declined to prosecute this matter and that its investigation into the matter is now closed. Ciena continues to cooperate fully with the SEC in its investigation into this matter.
Ciena’s operations in the relevant country have constituted less than
1.5%
of consolidated revenues as reported by Ciena in each fiscal year from 2012 through 2017. Ciena does not currently anticipate that this matter will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations. However, as discussions with the SEC are ongoing, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be predicted at this time. As of the filing of this Report, no provision with respect to this matter has been made in Ciena’s consolidated financial statements. Any determination that Ciena’s operations or activities are not in compliance with the FCPA or other applicable laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines, civil and criminal penalties, and equitable remedies, including disgorgement or injunctive relief.
In addition to the matters described in “Litigation” and “Internal Investigation” above, Ciena is subject to various legal proceedings, claims and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business, including those that relate to employment, commercial, tax and other regulatory matters. Ciena is also subject to intellectual property related claims, including claims against third parties that may involve contractual indemnification obligations on the part of Ciena. Ciena does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve such matters will have a material effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Lease Commitments
Ciena has certain minimum obligations under non-cancelable leases expiring on various dates through 2032 for equipment and facilities. The following table summarizes our future annual minimum lease commitments under non-cancelable leases that are not recorded on the balance sheet as of
October 31, 2018
(in thousands):
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating leases
|
$
|
28,912
|
|
$
|
24,348
|
|
$
|
21,320
|
|
$
|
15,839
|
|
$
|
13,142
|
|
$
|
47,047
|
|
$
|
150,608
|
|
|||||||
Rental expense for fiscal
2018
, fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
was approximately
$24.1 million
,
$30.9 million
and
$26.6 million
, respectively. In addition, Ciena paid approximately
$1.9 million
,
$2.7 million
and
$0.8 million
during fiscal
2018
,
111
fiscal
2017
and fiscal
2016
, respectively, related to rent costs for restructured facilities and unfavorable lease commitments, which were offset against Ciena’s restructuring liabilities and unfavorable lease obligations. The amount for operating lease commitments above does not include variable expenses relating to insurance, taxes, maintenance and other costs required by the applicable operating lease. These costs are not expected to have a material impact on Ciena’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
(25) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Stock Repurchase Program
On December 13, 2018, Ciena announced that its Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to
$500 million
of its common stock. The amount and timing of repurchases are subject to a variety of factors including liquidity, cash flow, stock price and general business and market conditions. The program may be modified, suspended, or discontinued at any time. This program terminates and replaces in its entire the previous stock repurchase program authorized in fiscal 2018. From the end of the fiscal year ending
October 31, 2018
through
December 17, 2018
, Ciena did not repurchase shares of its common stock under this prior stock repurchase program.
Settlement of Conversions of
3.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due October 15, 2018 (“New Notes”)
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 Ciena elected to settle the conversion of the New Notes prior to maturity in a combination of cash and shares, with the cash portion not to exceed an aggregate amount of approximately
$400 million
. Per the settlement provisions of the indenture governing conversion of the New Notes, an amount of
$288.7 million
(representing the aggregate principal amount) was paid in cash on October 15, 2018. During the relevant settlement period, Ciena’s shares traded at a volume weighted average price in excess of the
$20.17
per share conversion price. As such, Ciena paid
$111.3 million
in excess of the aggregate principal amount in cash, and
$52.9 million
settled in shares, or
1.6 million
shares. These amounts were recorded as debt conversion liability at fiscal year-end
October 31, 2018
and were settled during the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
None.
112
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of Ciena Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
The internal control over financial reporting at Ciena Corporation was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
•
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Ciena Corporation;
|
|
•
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America;
|
|
•
|
provide reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of Ciena Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of Ciena Corporation; and
|
|
•
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Management of Ciena Corporation assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
October 31, 2018
. Management based this assessment on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in “COSO 2013 Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of
October 31, 2018
, Ciena Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, who audited and reported on the consolidated financial statements of Ciena Corporation included in this annual report, has also audited the effectiveness of Ciena Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of
October 31, 2018
, as stated in its report appearing in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
|
/s/ Gary B. Smith
|
/s/ James E. Moylan, Jr.
|
||
|
Gary B. Smith
|
|
James E. Moylan, Jr.
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
None.
113
Information relating to our directors and executive officers is set forth in Part I of this annual report under the caption “Item 1. Business—Directors and Executive Officers.”
Additional information responsive to this item concerning our Audit Committee and regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy statement with respect to our
2019
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.
As part of our system of corporate governance, our board of directors has adopted a code of ethics that is specifically applicable to our chief executive officer and senior financial officers. This Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, as well as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, applicable to all directors, officers and employees, are available on the “Corporate Governance” page of our website at
http://www.ciena.com
. We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, by posting such information on our website at the address above.
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy statement with respect to our
2019
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy statement with respect to our
2019
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy statement with respect to our
2019
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy statement with respect to our
2019
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.
114
|
(a)
|
1. The information required by this item is included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
|
|
2.
|
The information required by this item is included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
|
|
3.
|
Exhibits: See Index to Exhibits, which is incorporated by reference in this Item. The Exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference as part of this annual report.
|
|
(b)
|
Exhibits. See Index to Exhibits, which is incorporated by reference in this Item. The Exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference as part of this annual report.
|
|
(c)
|
Not applicable.
|
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the
21st day of December 2018
.
|
Ciena Corporation
|
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/ Gary B. Smith
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Smith
|
|
||
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
115
|
Signatures
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick H. Nettles, Ph.D.
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
Patrick H. Nettles, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gary B. Smith
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
Gary B. Smith
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James E. Moylan, Jr.
|
|
Sr. Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
James E. Moylan, Jr.
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Andrew C. Petrik
|
|
Vice President, Controller
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
Andrew C. Petrik
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bruce L. Claflin
|
|
Director
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
Bruce L. Claflin
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lawton W. Fitt
|
|
Director
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
Lawton W. Fitt
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick T. Gallagher
|
|
Director
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
Patrick T. Gallagher
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ T. Michael Nevens
|
Director
|
December 21, 2018
|
||
|
T. Michael Nevens
|
||||
|
/s/ Judith M. O’Brien
|
|
Director
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
Judith M. O’Brien
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joanne B. Olsen
|
Director
|
December 21, 2018
|
||
|
Joanne B. Olsen
|
||||
|
/s/ Michael J. Rowny
|
|
Director
|
|
December 21, 2018
|
|
Michael J. Rowny
|
||||
116
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Form and
|
|
|
Filed
|
|||||
|
Exhibit
|
Registration or
|
|
|
Here-
|
||||||
|
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Commission No.
|
Exhibit
|
Filing Date
|
with (X)
|
|||||
|
3.1
|
8-K (000-21969)
|
3.1
|
3/27/2008
|
|||||||
|
3.2
|
8-K (001-36250)
|
3.1
|
1/27/2017
|
|||||||
|
4.1
|
10-K (000-21969)
|
4.1
|
12/27/2007
|
|||||||
|
10.1
|
8-K
(001-36250)
|
10.1
|
3/29/2017
|
|||||||
|
10.2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
||
|
10.3
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|||
|
10.4
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|||
|
10.5
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|||
|
10.6
|
8-K (000-21969)
|
10.1
|
3/27/2008
|
|
||||||
|
10.7
|
8-K (000-21969)
|
10.1
|
4/15/2010
|
|
||||||
|
10.8
|
8-K (000-21969)
|
10.1
|
3/23/2012
|
|||||||
|
10.9
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.1
|
6/11/2014
|
|||||||
|
10.10
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.2
|
6/8/2016
|
|||||||
|
10.11
|
10-K (000-21969)
|
10.18
|
12/22/2011
|
|||||||
|
10.12
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.2
|
6/4/2009
|
|
||||||
|
10.13
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.3
|
6/4/2009
|
|||||||
|
10.14
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.1
|
6/7/2017
|
|||||||
|
10.15
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
|
10.2
|
|
6/7/2017
|
|||||
|
10.16
|
S-1 (333-187732)
|
10.2.1
|
4/4/2013
|
|||||||
117
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Form and
|
|
|
Filed
|
|||||
|
Exhibit
|
Registration or
|
|
|
Here-
|
||||||
|
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Commission No.
|
Exhibit
|
Filing Date
|
with (X)
|
|||||
|
10.17
|
S-1 (333-187732)
|
10.3.1
|
4/4/2013
|
|||||||
|
10.18
|
10-K (000-21969)
|
10.37
|
12/11/2003
|
|||||||
|
10.19
|
8-K (000-21969)
|
10.1
|
11/4/2005
|
|||||||
|
10.20
|
8-K (000-21969)
|
10.4
|
11/4/2005
|
|
||||||
|
10.21
|
8-K (000-21969)
|
10.5
|
11/4/2005
|
|
||||||
|
10.22
|
S-8 (333-149520)
|
10.1
|
3/4/2008
|
|
||||||
|
10.23
|
S-8 (333-214594)
|
10.1
|
11/14/2016
|
|||||||
|
10.24
|
10-K (000-21969)
|
10.26
|
12/22/2011
|
|||||||
|
10.25
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.1
|
6/9/2011
|
|
||||||
|
10.26
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.1
|
3/3/2006
|
|
||||||
|
10.27
|
10-K (000-21969)
|
10.23
|
12/21/2016
|
|||||||
|
10.28
|
10-K (000-21969)
|
10.24
|
12/21/2016
|
|||||||
|
10.29
|
10-K (001-36250)
|
|
10.36
|
|
12/19/2014
|
|||||
|
10.30
|
8-K (001-36250)
|
10.3
|
6/3/2015
|
|||||||
|
10.31
|
8-K (001-36250)
|
10.4
|
6/3/2015
|
|||||||
|
10.32
|
10-K (000-21969)
|
|
10.34
|
|
12/22/2011
|
|||||
|
10.33
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.1
|
9/5/2012
|
|
||||||
|
10.34
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.2
|
9/5/2012
|
|||||||
118
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Form and
|
|
|
Filed
|
|||||
|
Exhibit
|
Registration or
|
|
|
Here-
|
||||||
|
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Commission No.
|
Exhibit
|
Filing Date
|
with (X)
|
|||||
|
10.35
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.2
|
3/13/2013
|
|||||||
|
10.36
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.1
|
9/9/2014
|
|||||||
|
10.37
|
8-K (001-36250)
|
10.2
|
6/3/2015
|
|||||||
|
10.38
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.2
|
9/9/2015
|
|||||||
|
10.39
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
4.1
|
3/9/2016
|
|||||||
|
10.40
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.2
|
6/12/2013
|
|||||||
|
10.41
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.2
|
9/9/2014
|
|||||||
|
10.42
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.3
|
9/9/2014
|
|||||||
|
10.43
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.5
|
9/5/2012
|
|||||||
|
10.44
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.7
|
9/5/2012
|
|||||||
|
10.45
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.4
|
9/9/2014
|
|||||||
119
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Form and
|
|
|
Filed
|
|||||
|
Exhibit
|
Registration or
|
|
|
Here-
|
||||||
|
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Commission No.
|
Exhibit
|
Filing Date
|
with (X)
|
|||||
|
10.46
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
4.2
|
3/9/2016
|
|||||||
|
10.47
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.5
|
9/9/2014
|
|||||||
|
10.48
|
8-K (001-36250)
|
10.1
|
6/3/2015
|
|||||||
|
10.49
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.1
|
9/9/2015
|
|||||||
|
10.50
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.3
|
9/7/2017
|
|||||||
|
10.51
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.1
|
6/8/2016
|
|||||||
|
10.52
|
|
10-Q
(001-36250)
|
10.1
|
3/8/2017
|
||||||
|
10.53
|
|
8-K (001-36520)
|
10.1
|
10/1/2018
|
||||||
|
10.54
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.6
|
9/9/2014
|
|||||||
|
10.55
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.7
|
9/9/2014
|
|||||||
|
10.56
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
X
|
||||||
|
10.57
|
10-Q (001-36250)
|
10.8
|
9/9/2014
|
|||||||
120
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Form and
|
|
|
Filed
|
|||||
|
Exhibit
|
Registration or
|
|
|
Here-
|
||||||
|
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Commission No.
|
Exhibit
|
Filing Date
|
with (X)
|
|||||
|
10.58
|
10-Q (000-21969)
|
10.3
|
6/10/2010
|
|||||||
|
21.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
X
|
121
________________________________
|
*
|
|
Represents management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
|
|
+
|
|
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, certain schedules and exhibits referenced in the table of contents have been omitted. Ciena hereby agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the SEC upon request. In addition, representations and warranties included in these agreements, as amended, were made by the parties to one another in connection with a negotiated transaction. These representations and warranties were made as of specific dates, only for purposes of these agreements and for the benefit of the parties thereto. These representations and warranties were subject to important exceptions and limitations agreed upon by the parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures, made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties rather than establishing these matters as facts. These agreements are filed with this report only to provide investors with information regarding its terms and conditions, and not to provide any other factual information regarding Ciena or any other party thereto. Accordingly, investors should not rely on the representations and warranties contained in these agreements or any description thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of any party, its subsidiaries or affiliates. The information in these agreements should be considered together with Ciena’s public reports filed with the SEC.
|
|
++
|
Representations and warranties included in these agreements, as amended, were made by the parties to one another in connection with a negotiated transaction. These representations and warranties were made as of specific dates, only for purposes of these agreements and for the benefit of the parties thereto. These representations and warranties were subject to important exceptions and limitations agreed upon by the parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures, made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties rather than establishing these matters as facts. These agreements are filed with this report only to provide investors with information regarding its terms and conditions, and not to provide any other factual information regarding Ciena or any other party thereto. Accordingly, investors should not rely on the representations and warranties contained in these agreements or any description thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of any party, its subsidiaries or affiliates. The information in these agreements should be considered together with Ciena’s public reports filed with the SEC.
|
|
|
#
|
|
Certain portions of these documents have been omitted based on a request for confidential treatment submitted to the SEC. The non-public information that has been omitted from these documents has been separately filed with the SEC. Each redacted portion of these documents is indicated by a “[*]” and is subject to the request for confidential treatment submitted to the SEC. The redacted information is confidential information of the Registrant.
|
122
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant S Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Consolidated Financial DataItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement SchedulesItem 16. Form 10-k Summary