These terms and conditions govern your use of the website alphaminr.com and its related services.
These Terms and Conditions (“Terms”) are a binding contract between you and Alphaminr, (“Alphaminr”, “we”, “us” and “service”). You must agree to and accept the Terms. These Terms include the provisions in this document as well as those in the Privacy Policy. These terms may be modified at any time.
Your subscription will be on a month to month basis and automatically renew every month. You may terminate your subscription at any time through your account.
We will provide you with advance notice of any change in fees.
You represent that you are of legal age to form a binding contract. You are responsible for any
activity associated with your account. The account can be logged in at only one computer at a
time.
The Services are intended for your own individual use. You shall only use the Services in a
manner that complies with all laws. You may not use any automated software, spider or system to
scrape data from Alphaminr.
Alphaminr is not a financial advisor and does not provide financial advice of any kind. The service is provided “As is”. The materials and information accessible through the Service are solely for informational purposes. While we strive to provide good information and data, we make no guarantee or warranty as to its accuracy.
TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL ALPHAMINR BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR INVESTMENT LOSSES, LOSS OF DATA, OR ACCURACY OF DATA, OR FOR ANY AMOUNT, IN THE AGGREGATE, IN EXCESS OF THE GREATER OF (1) FIFTY DOLLARS OR (2) THE AMOUNTS PAID BY YOU TO ALPHAMINR IN THE SIX MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THIS APPLICABLE CLAIM. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL OR CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES, SO THE ABOVE LIMITATION AND EXCLUSIONS MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
If any provision of these Terms is found to be invalid under any applicable law, such provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions herein.
This privacy policy describes how we (“Alphaminr”) collect, use, share and protect your personal information when we provide our service (“Service”). This Privacy Policy explains how information is collected about you either directly or indirectly. By using our service, you acknowledge the terms of this Privacy Notice. If you do not agree to the terms of this Privacy Policy, please do not use our Service. You should contact us if you have questions about it. We may modify this Privacy Policy periodically.
When you register for our Service, we collect information from you such as your name, email address and credit card information.
Like many other websites we use “cookies”, which are small text files that are stored on your computer or other device that record your preferences and actions, including how you use the website. You can set your browser or device to refuse all cookies or to alert you when a cookie is being sent. If you delete your cookies, if you opt-out from cookies, some Services may not function properly. We collect information when you use our Service. This includes which pages you visit.
We use Google Analytics and we use Stripe for payment processing. We will not share the information we collect with third parties for promotional purposes. We may share personal information with law enforcement as required or permitted by law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|
|
Ohio
|
31-0746871
|
|
(State of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
Part I
|
3
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Business
|
3
|
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation – Introduction
|
3
|
|
|
Our Business and Our Strategy
|
3
|
|
|
Our Segments
|
12
|
|
|
Other
|
22
|
|
|
Regulation
|
22
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
24
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
30
|
|
Item 2.
|
Properties
|
30
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
30
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed and Reserved)
|
30
|
|
Part II
|
31
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
31
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
34
|
|
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
36
|
|
Introduction
|
36
|
|
|
Executive Summary
|
36
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Estimates
|
40
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
48
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
48
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
78
|
|
|
Safe Harbor Statement
|
92
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
93
|
|
Introduction
|
93
|
|
|
Fixed-Maturity Investments
|
94
|
|
|
Equity Investments
|
95
|
|
|
Application of Asset Impairment Policy
|
96
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
98
|
|
Responsibility for Financial Statements
|
98
|
|
|
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
99
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
100
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
101
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
102
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
|
103
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
104
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
105
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
131
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
131
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other Information
|
131
|
|
Part III
|
132
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
132
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
133
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
133
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
|
134
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
134
|
|
Part IV
|
134
|
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
|
134
|
|
Index of Exhibits
|
146
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Business
|
|
|
·
|
providing market stability through financial strength
|
|
|
·
|
producing competitive, up-to-date products and services
|
|
|
·
|
developing associates committed to superior service
|
|
|
·
|
Commitment to our network of professional independent insurance agencies and to their continued success
|
|
|
·
|
Financial strength that lets us be a consistent market for our agents’ business, supporting stability and confidence
|
|
|
·
|
Operating structure that supports local decision making, showcasing our claims excellence and allowing us to balance growth with underwriting discipline
|
|
|
·
|
choose to sell a limited product line or only one type of insurance (monoline carrier)
|
|
|
·
|
target a certain segment of the market (for example, personal insurance)
|
|
|
·
|
focus on one or more states or regions (regional carrier)
|
|
|
·
|
independent agents, who represent multiple carriers
|
|
|
·
|
captive agents, who represent one carrier exclusively, or
|
|
|
·
|
direct marketing to consumers
|
|
|
·
|
Our $8.383 billion fixed-maturity portfolio is diversified and exceeds total insurance reserves. At December 31, 2010, no corporate bond exposure accounted for more than 0.8 percent of our fixed-maturity portfolio and no municipal exposure accounted for more than 0.3 percent. The portfolio had an average rating of A2/A and its fair value exceeded total insurance reserve liability by approximately 35 percent.
|
|
|
·
|
The strength of our fixed-maturity portfolio provides an opportunity to invest for potential capital appreciation by purchasing equity securities. Our $3.041 billion equity portfolio minimizes concentrations in single stocks or industries. At December 31, 2010, no single security accounted for more than 6 percent of our portfolio of publicly traded common stocks, and no single sector accounted for more than 16 percent.
|
|
|
·
|
We ended 2010 with a 0.8-to-1 ratio of property casualty premiums to surplus, a key measure of property casualty insurance company capacity and security. A lower ratio indicates more security for policyholders and greater capacity for growth by an insurer. Our low ratio, compared with historical averages, gives us ample flexibility to diversify risk by expanding our operations into new geographies and product areas. The estimated industry average ratio was 0.7-to-1 for 2010.
|
|
|
·
|
We ended 2010 with a 14.1 percent ratio of life statutory adjusted risk-based surplus to liabilities, a key measure of life insurance company capital strength. The estimated industry average ratio was 12.0 percent for 2010. A higher ratio indicates an insurer’s stronger security for policyholders and capacity to support business growth.
|
| (Dollars in millions) Statutory Information |
At December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
Standard market property casualty insurance subsidiary
|
||||||||
|
Statutory surplus
|
$ | 3,777 | $ | 3,648 | ||||
|
Risk-based capital (RBC)
|
3,793 | 3,664 | ||||||
|
Authorized control level risk-based capital
|
450 | 437 | ||||||
|
Ratio of risk-based capital to authorized control level risk-based capital
|
8.4 | 8.4 | ||||||
|
Written premium to surplus ratio
|
0.8 | 0.8 | ||||||
|
Life insurance subsidiary
|
||||||||
|
Statutory surplus
|
$ | 303 | $ | 300 | ||||
|
Risk-based capital (RBC)
|
318 | 316 | ||||||
|
Authorized control level risk-based capital
|
35 | 40 | ||||||
|
Ratio of risk-based capital to authorized control level risk-based capital
|
9.1 | 7.9 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities excluding separate account business
|
2,266 | 1,960 | ||||||
|
Life statutory risk-based adjusted surplus to liabilities ratio
|
14.1 | 16.3 | ||||||
|
Excess and surplus insurance subsidiary
|
||||||||
|
Statutory surplus
|
$ | 172 | $ | 168 | ||||
|
Risk-based capital (RBC)
|
172 | 168 | ||||||
|
Authorized control level risk-based capital
|
10 | 8 | ||||||
|
Ratio of risk-based capital to authorized control level risk-based capital
|
16.6 | 21.4 | ||||||
|
Written premium to surplus ratio
|
0.3 | 0.2 | ||||||
|
Insurer Financial Strength Ratings
|
||||||||||||||
|
Rating
Agency
|
Standard Market Property Casualty
Insurance Subsidiary
|
Life Insurance
Subsidiary
|
Excess and Surplus
Insurance
Subsidiary
|
Date of Most Recent
Affirmation or Action
|
||||||||||
|
Rating
Tier
|
Rating
Tier
|
Rating
Tier
|
||||||||||||
|
A. M. Best Co.
|
A+
|
Superior
|
2 of 16
|
A
|
Excellent
|
3 of 16
|
A
|
Excellent
|
3 of 16
|
Stable outlook (12/13/10)
|
||||
|
Fitch Ratings
|
A+
|
Strong
|
5 of 21
|
A+
|
Strong
|
5 of 21
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Stable outlook (9/2/10)
|
||||
|
Moody's Investors
Service
|
A1
|
Good
|
5 of 21
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Stable outlook (9/25/08)
|
||||
|
Standard & Poor's
Ratings Services
|
A
|
Strong
|
6 of 21
|
A
|
Strong
|
6 of 21
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Stable outlook (7/19/10)
|
||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Earned
premiums
|
% of total
earned
|
Agency
locations
|
Average
premium per
location
|
||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Ohio
|
$ | 599 | 20.5 | % | 224 | $ | 2.7 | |||||||||
|
Illinois
|
243 | 8.3 | 122 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Indiana
|
197 | 6.8 | 105 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
|
Pennsylvania
|
176 | 6.0 | 83 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Georgia
|
149 | 5.1 | 77 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
|
North Carolina
|
143 | 4.9 | 80 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
|
Michigan
|
126 | 4.3 | 116 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Virginia
|
121 | 4.1 | 60 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Kentucky
|
106 | 3.6 | 41 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Tennessee
|
102 | 3.5 | 48 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Ohio
|
$ | 611 | 21.0 | % | 224 | $ | 2.7 | |||||||||
|
Illinois
|
253 | 8.7 | 119 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Indiana
|
201 | 6.9 | 104 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
|
Pennsylvania
|
174 | 6.0 | 82 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Georgia
|
148 | 5.1 | 71 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||
|
North Carolina
|
138 | 4.8 | 75 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
|
Michigan
|
129 | 4.4 | 109 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
|
Virginia
|
121 | 4.2 | 60 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Wisconsin
|
103 | 3.5 | 49 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Kentucky
|
100 | 3.5 | 40 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
allow our field and headquarters associates to collaborate with each other and with agencies more efficiently
|
|
|
·
|
provide our agencies the ability to access our systems and client data to process business transactions from their offices
|
|
|
·
|
allow policyholders to directly access pertinent policy information online in order to further improve efficiency for our agencies
|
|
|
·
|
automate our internal processes so our associates can spend more time serving agents and policyholders, and
|
|
|
·
|
reduce duplicated effort, introducing more efficient processes that reduce company and agency costs
|
|
|
·
|
Improve pricing precision using predictive analytics – We continue efforts to expand our pricing capabilities by using predictive analytics and expect cumulative benefits of these efforts to improve loss ratios over time. Development of additional business data to support accurate underwriting, pricing and other business decisions also continues. A phased project that will continue over the next several years will deploy a full data management program, including a data warehouse for our property casualty and life insurance operations, providing enhanced granularity of pricing data. Specific initiatives that are key to improving pricing precision are summarized below.
|
|
|
o
|
Commercial lines – In the second half of 2009, we began to use predictive modeling tools that align individual insurance policy pricing to risk attributes for our workers’ compensation line of business. During fourth-quarter 2010, we completed development of predictive models for our commercial auto line of business and also for general liability and commercial property coverages in commercial package accounts. We plan in 2011 to integrate these models into our policy processing systems. Underwriters using these tools will be able to target profitability and to provide pricing impacts to agency personnel. Additional reports to monitor use and results at several levels should also contribute to improved pricing.
|
|
|
o
|
Personal lines – Prior to 2010, we began to use predictive modeling tools for our homeowner line of business, and in late 2010 we began using similar analytics for personal auto. We believe we are successfully attracting more of our agents’ preferred business, based on the average quality of our book of business. Quality has improved as measured by the mix of business by insurance score. During 2011, we will continue to develop the models by calibrating pricing precision to allow us to write more business profitably. Further educational support for agency personnel and enhanced reporting to monitor results for all users will also be developed. These tools enable us to increase the speed of introducing new rates and model attributes, more rapidly adapting to changes in market
conditions.
|
|
|
·
|
Improve agency-level planning for profitability and growth – Additional use of analytics tools will help us better understand business in more detail and communicate additional quantitative and qualitative information to agents and associates. Development of models at an agency level to predict profitability, along with enhanced reporting of related metrics, should facilitate coordination and consistent decision-making. During 2011, we expect to enhance our agency planning processes to develop multi-year profitability and growth plans. Evaluating agency and state-level plans through models that aggregate company-level results will help determine if executing plans formulated at those levels, in aggregate, are adequate to reach our broader performance objectives.
|
|
|
·
|
Improve internal processes and further deploy performance metrics – Improving processes supports our strategic goals and can reduce internal costs. Use of additional measurements to track progress and accountability for results will improve our overall effectiveness. Completion of development for additional coverages in our commercial lines policy administration system is expected to facilitate important internal process improvement initiatives for 2011. One important initiative aims to develop business rules and parameters for personal lines accounts that will allow processing of some business without intervention by an underwriter, for risks that meet qualifying underwriting criteria. The objective is to streamline processing for our agents and associates, permitting more time for
risks that need additional service or attention. The initiative also includes developing technology to integrate automated steps into the current process plus changes in workflow, including auditing for compliance with eligibility requirements. We expect in the future a similar streamlined process will eventually be developed for parts of our commercial lines business.
|
|
|
·
|
Gain a larger share of agency business – We will continue to execute on prior year growth initiatives and add new initiatives to improve our penetration in each market we serve through our independent agencies. Our focus remains on the key components of agent satisfaction based on factors agents tell us are most important.
|
|
|
o
|
Innovate our small business strategy – Additional focus on attributes that agencies weigh heavily in carrier selection for their clients is a key component of this initiative. Those attributes include technology ease of use and integration with agency management systems, flexible billing, product breadth and pricing, and service and marketing support for new business. The initiative includes refining workflows for the entire policy process and providing additional policyholder services. We also are developing and coordinating targeted marketing, including cross-selling opportunities, through our Target Markets department. This area focuses on new commercial product development, including identification and promotional support for promising classes of business. Small business policies are
already an important part of our commercial lines property casualty insurance segment. Nearly 90 percent of our commercial in-force policies have annual premiums of $10,000 or less, accounting in total for approximately one-third of our 2010 commercial lines premium volume. Profitably growing our book of small business is expected to provide significant growth opportunities for the agencies that represent us while also benefiting the company. Small business does not typically trend quite as severely with pricing cycles, producing a more stable block of premium. This strategy also is expected to improve profitability due to lower expenses through more automation of data gathering and use of predictive analytics.
|
|
|
o
|
New agency appointments – We continue to appoint new agencies to develop additional points of distribution, focusing on markets where our market share is less than 1 percent while also considering economic and catastrophe risk factors. In 2011, we are targeting approximately 120 appointments of independent agencies, with a significant portion in the five states we entered since late 2008. We seek to build a close, long-term relationship with each agency we appoint. We carefully evaluate the marketing reach of each new appointment to ensure the territory can support both current and new agencies. In counting new agency appointments, we include appointment of new agency relationships with The Cincinnati Insurance Companies. For those that we believe will produce a meaningful
amount of new business premiums, we also count appointments of agencies that merge with a Cincinnati agency and new branch offices opened by existing Cincinnati agencies. We made 93, 87 and 76 new appointments in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, with 70, 65 and 52 representing new relationships. One-quarter of the agencies appointed during 2010 were in the five states we entered since late 2008: Texas, Colorado, Wyoming, Connecticut and Oregon. The contribution of those states to our property casualty premium growth should occur over several years as time is required to fully realize the benefits of our agency relationships. We generally earn a 10 percent share of an agency’s business within 10 years of its appointment. We also help our agents grow their business by attracting more clients in their communities through unique Cincinnati-style
service.
|
|
|
·
|
Improve consumer relationships we undertake on behalf of our agencies – Improved interactions with consumers who are clients and prospects of our agents can drive more business to agents and help them grow. Through this initiative, we expect to identify the various ways we interact with consumers on behalf of our agencies and ensure that we do so in a manner that reinforces the value of the independent agent while establishing the value and service of a Cincinnati policy. By understanding and monitoring trends that drive consumer purchasing decisions, we can create positive interactions. We expect online policyholder services to continue evolving and will continue to work with agencies to meet the needs of their clients.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial lines property casualty insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Personal lines property casualty insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Excess and surplus lines property casualty insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Investments
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial casualty – Provides coverage to businesses against third-party liability from accidents occurring on their premises or arising out of their operations, including liability coverage for injuries sustained from products sold as well as coverage for professional services, such as dentistry. Specialized casualty policies may include liability coverage for employment practices liability (EPLI), which protects businesses against claims by employees that their legal rights as employees of the company have been violated, and against other acts or failures to act under specified circumstances; and excess insurance and umbrella liability, including personal umbrella liability written as an endorsement to commercial umbrella coverages. The commercial casualty business line includes
liability coverage written on both a discounted and nondiscounted basis as part of commercial package policies.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial property – Provides coverage for loss or damage to buildings, inventory and equipment caused by covered causes of loss such as fire, wind, hail, water, theft and vandalism, as well as business interruption resulting from a covered loss. Commercial property also includes crime insurance, which provides coverage for losses such as embezzlement or misappropriation of funds by an employee, among others; and inland marine insurance, which provides coverage for a variety of mobile equipment, such as contractor’s equipment, builder’s risk, cargo and electronic data processing equipment. Various property coverages can be written as stand-alone policies or can be added to a package policy. The commercial property business line includes property coverage written on both
a nondiscounted and discounted basis as part of commercial package policies.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial auto – Protects businesses against liability to others for both bodily injury and property damage, medical payments to insureds and occupants of their vehicles, physical damage to an insured’s own vehicle from collision and various other perils, and damages caused by uninsured motorists.
|
|
|
·
|
Workers’ compensation – Protects employers against specified benefits payable under state or federal law for workplace injuries to employees. We write workers’ compensation coverage in all of our active states except North Dakota, Ohio and Washington, where coverage is provided solely by the state instead of by private insurers.
|
|
|
·
|
Specialty packages – Includes coverages for property, liability and business interruption tailored to meet the needs of specific industry classes such as artisan contractors, dentists, garage operators, financial
|
|
|
·
|
Surety and executive risk – This business line includes:
|
|
|
o
|
Contract and commercial surety bonds, which guarantee a payment or reimbursement for financial losses resulting from dishonesty, failure to perform and other acts.
|
|
|
o
|
Fidelity bonds, which cover losses that policyholders incur as a result of fraudulent acts by specified individuals or dishonest acts by employees.
|
|
|
o
|
Director and officer liability insurance, which covers liability for actual or alleged errors in judgment, breaches of duty or other wrongful acts related to activities of for-profit or nonprofit organizations. Approximately 70 percent of new policies and almost 40 percent of director and officer new business premiums written in 2010 were for nonprofit entities. Our director and officer liability policy can optionally include EPLI coverage.
|
|
|
·
|
Machinery and equipment – Specialized coverage provides protection for loss or damage to boilers and machinery, including production and computer equipment, from sudden and accidental mechanical breakdown, steam explosion or artificially generated electrical current.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Earned
premiums
|
% of total
earned
|
Agency
locations
|
Average
premium per
location |
||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Ohio
|
$ | 347 | 16.1 | % | 223 | $ | 1.6 | |||||||||
|
Illinois
|
187 | 8.7 | 120 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Pennsylvania
|
157 | 7.3 | 83 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
|
Indiana
|
133 | 6.2 | 104 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||
|
North Carolina
|
120 | 5.6 | 78 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
|
Virginia
|
100 | 4.6 | 60 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Michigan
|
96 | 4.5 | 115 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
|
Georgia
|
82 | 3.8 | 75 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Wisconsin
|
81 | 3.8 | 48 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Tennessee
|
79 | 3.7 | 48 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Ohio
|
$ | 359 | 16.3 | % | 223 | $ | 1.6 | |||||||||
|
Illinois
|
202 | 9.2 | 117 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Pennsylvania
|
157 | 7.1 | 82 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
|
Indiana
|
140 | 6.4 | 103 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
|
North Carolina
|
127 | 5.8 | 74 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Michigan
|
102 | 4.6 | 108 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
|
Virginia
|
101 | 4.6 | 60 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Georgia
|
85 | 3.9 | 71 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
|
Wisconsin
|
83 | 3.8 | 49 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Iowa
|
79 | 3.6 | 46 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Personal auto – Protects against liability to others for both bodily injury and property damage, medical payments to insureds and occupants of their vehicle, physical damage to an insured’s own vehicle from collision and various other perils, and damages caused by uninsured motorists. In addition, many states require policies to provide first-party personal injury protection, frequently referred to as no-fault coverage.
|
|
|
·
|
Homeowners – Protects against losses to dwellings and contents from a wide variety of perils, as well as liability arising out of personal activities both on and off the covered premises. The company also offers coverage for condominium unit owners and renters.
|
|
|
·
|
Other personal lines – This includes the variety of other types of insurance products we offer to individuals such as dwelling fire, inland marine, personal umbrella liability and watercraft coverages.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Earned
premiums
|
% of total
earned
|
Agency
locations
|
Average
premium
per
location
|
||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Ohio
|
$ | 246 | 34.1 | % | 199 | $ | 1.2 | |||||||||
|
Georgia
|
63 | 8.8 | 69 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
|
Indiana
|
59 | 8.2 | 82 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Illinois
|
52 | 7.2 | 86 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Alabama
|
42 | 5.9 | 38 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Kentucky
|
40 | 5.5 | 37 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Michigan
|
28 | 3.8 | 90 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
|
Tennessee
|
22 | 3.1 | 43 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
|
North Carolina
|
20 | 2.8 | 67 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
|
Virginia
|
20 | 2.8 | 38 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Ohio
|
$ | 248 | 36.1 | % | 202 | $ | 1.2 | |||||||||
|
Georgia
|
61 | 8.9 | 63 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Indiana
|
57 | 8.4 | 79 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Illinois
|
48 | 7.1 | 84 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Alabama
|
41 | 5.9 | 36 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Kentucky
|
36 | 5.3 | 35 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Michigan
|
26 | 3.8 | 80 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
|
Tennessee
|
20 | 2.9 | 36 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Florida
|
20 | 2.9 | 10 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Virginia
|
19 | 2.8 | 35 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Commercial casualty – Covers businesses for third-party liability from accidents occurring on their premises or arising out of their operations, including products and completed operations. The majority of these policies have coverage limits of $1 million or less. Miscellaneous errors and omissions and professional coverage for liability from actual or alleged errors in judgment, breaches of duty or other wrongful acts related to activities of insured businesses is also available, as is excess liability coverage that adds another layer of protection to other liability insurance policies. Typical businesses covered include contractors, consultants, bars or taverns, and manufacturers. Policies covering liability at special events are also available.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial property – Insures loss or damage to buildings, inventory, equipment and business income from causes of loss such as fire, wind, hail, water, theft and vandalism. Examples of property we commonly insure with excess and surplus lines policies include temporarily vacant buildings, restaurants and relatively higher-hazard manufacturing classes.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Earned
premiums
|
% of total
earned
|
||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
||||||||
|
Ohio
|
$ | 7 | 13.2 | % | ||||
|
Indiana
|
5 | 11.0 | ||||||
|
Illinois
|
4 | 8.3 | ||||||
|
Georgia
|
4 | 7.3 | ||||||
|
Missouri
|
2 | 4.7 | ||||||
|
Michigan
|
2 | 4.7 | ||||||
|
Pennsylvania
|
2 | 4.2 | ||||||
|
North Carolina
|
2 | 4.1 | ||||||
|
Texas
|
2 | 3.9 | ||||||
|
Kentucky
|
2 | 3.7 | ||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
||||||||
|
Ohio
|
$ | 4 | 16.4 | % | ||||
|
Indiana
|
4 | 13.8 | ||||||
|
Illinois
|
3 | 11.5 | ||||||
|
Georgia
|
2 | 8.3 | ||||||
|
Michigan
|
1 | 5.3 | ||||||
|
North Carolina
|
1 | 4.8 | ||||||
|
Missouri
|
1 | 3.9 | ||||||
|
Wisconsin
|
1 | 3.7 | ||||||
|
Minnesota
|
1 | 3.3 | ||||||
|
Virginia
|
1 | 3.2 | ||||||
|
|
·
|
Term insurance – policies under which a death benefit is payable only if the insured dies during a specific period of time. For policies without a return of premium provision, no benefit is payable if the insured person survives to the end of the term. For policies inforce with a return of premium provision, a benefit equal to the sum of all paid base premiums is payable if the insured person survives to the end of the term. Premiums are fixed and they must be paid as scheduled. The policies are fully underwritten.
|
|
|
·
|
Universal life insurance – long-duration life insurance policies. Contract premiums are neither fixed nor guaranteed; however, the contract does specify a minimum interest crediting rate and a maximum cost of insurance charge and expense charge. Premiums are not fixed and may be varied by the contract owner. The cash values, available as a loan collateralized by the cash surrender value, are not guaranteed and depend on the amount and timing of actual premium payments and the amount of actual contract assessments. The policies are fully underwritten. Contracts with death benefit guarantees are available for individuals as well as for two lives on contracts called survivor universal life.
|
|
|
·
|
Worksite products – term insurance, return of premium term insurance, whole life insurance, universal life and disability insurance offered to employees through their employer. Premiums are collected by the employer using payroll deduction. Policies are issued using a simplified underwriting approach and on a guaranteed issue basis. Worksite insurance products provide our property casualty agency force with excellent cross-serving opportunities for both commercial and personal accounts. Agents report that offering worksite marketing to employees of their commercial accounts provides a benefit to the employees at no cost to the employer. Worksite marketing also connects agents with new customers who may not have previously benefited from receiving the services of a professional
independent insurance agent.
|
|
|
·
|
Whole life insurance – policies that provide life insurance for the entire lifetime of the insured. The death benefit is guaranteed never to decrease and premiums are guaranteed never to increase. While premiums are fixed, they must be paid as scheduled. These policies provide guaranteed cash values that are available as loans collateralized by the cash surrender value. The policies are fully underwritten.
|
|
|
·
|
Disability income insurance that provides monthly benefits to offset the loss of income when the insured person is unable to work due to accident or illness.
|
|
|
·
|
Deferred annuities that provide regular income payments that commence after the end of a specified period or when the annuitant attains a specified age. During the deferral period, any payments made under the contract accumulate at the crediting rate declared by the company but not less than a contract-specified guaranteed minimum interest rate. A deferred annuity may be surrendered during the deferral period for a cash value equal to the accumulated payments plus interest less the surrender charge, if any.
|
|
|
·
|
Immediate annuities that provide some combination of regular income and lump sum payments in exchange for a single premium.
|
|
|
·
|
Because our property casualty operations are held in high regard, property casualty agency management is predisposed to consider selling our life products.
|
|
|
·
|
Marketing efforts for both our property casualty and life insurance businesses are directed by our field marketing department, which assures consistency of communication and operations. Life field marketing representatives are available to meet face-to-face with agency personnel and their clients as well.
|
|
|
·
|
Our life headquarters underwriters and other associates are available to the agents and field team to assist in the placement of business. Fewer and fewer of our competitors provide direct, personal support between the agent and the insurance carrier.
|
|
|
·
|
We primarily offer products addressing the needs of businesses with key person and buy-sell coverages. We offer personal and commercial clients of our agencies quality, personal life insurance coverage.
|
|
|
·
|
Term insurance is our largest life insurance product line. We continue to introduce new term products with features our agents indicate are important, such as a return of premium benefit, and we have restructured our underwriting classifications to better meet the needs of their clients.
|
|
|
·
|
Fixed-maturity investments – Includes taxable and tax-exempt bonds and redeemable preferred stocks. During 2010 and 2009, purchases and market value gains served to more than offset sales and calls.
|
|
|
·
|
Equity investments – Includes common and nonredeemable preferred stocks. During 2010, purchases and fair value gains more than offset sales. During 2009, sales slightly offset fair value appreciation of equity securities.
|
|
|
·
|
Short-term investments – Primarily commercial paper.
|
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31, 2010
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Book value
|
% of BV
|
Fair value
|
% of FV
|
Book value
|
% of BV
|
Fair value
|
% of FV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Taxable fixed maturities
|
$ | 5,139 | 50.5 | % | $ | 5,533 | 48.4 | % | $ | 4,644 | 48.6 | % | $ | 4,863 | 46.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Tax-exempt fixed maturities
|
2,749 | 27.0 | 2,850 | 25.0 | 2,870 | 30.1 | 2,992 | 28.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common equities
|
2,211 | 21.7 | 2,940 | 25.7 | 1,941 | 20.4 | 2,608 | 24.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred equities
|
75 | 0.8 | 101 | 0.9 | 75 | 0.8 | 93 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term investments
|
0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 0.1 | 6 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 10,174 | 100.0 | % | $ | 11,424 | 100.0 | % | $ | 9,536 | 100.0 | % | $ | 10,562 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31, 2010
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fair
value
|
Percent
of total
|
Fair
value
|
Percent
of total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Moody's Ratings and Standard & Poor's Ratings combined:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Aaa, Aa, A, AAA, AA, A
|
$ | 5,216 | 62.2 | % | $ | 4,967 | 63.2 | % | ||||||||
|
Baa, BBB
|
2,656 | 31.7 | 2,302 | 29.3 | ||||||||||||
|
Ba, BB
|
241 | 2.9 | 279 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||
|
B, B
|
42 | 0.5 | 44 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Caa, CCC
|
19 | 0.2 | 29 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
|
Ca, CC
|
0 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Daa, Da, D
|
1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Non-rated
|
208 | 2.5 | 237 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 8,383 | 100.0 | % | $ | 7,861 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
|
At December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Weighted average yield-to-book value
|
5.5 |
%
|
5.9 |
%
|
||||||
|
Weighted average maturity
|
6.2 |
yrs
|
7.5 |
yrs
|
||||||
|
Effective duration
|
5.0 |
yrs
|
5.3 |
yrs
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
Investment-grade corporate
|
$ | 4,695 | $ | 3,941 | ||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
293 | 137 | ||||||
|
Below investment-grade corporate
|
268 | 309 | ||||||
|
Government sponsored enterprises
|
200 | 347 | ||||||
|
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached
|
69 | 91 | ||||||
|
United States government
|
5 | 4 | ||||||
|
Foreign government
|
3 | 3 | ||||||
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
- | 31 | ||||||
|
Short-term investments
|
- | 6 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 5,533 | $ | 4,869 | ||||
|
(In millions)
At December 31, 2010
|
State issued general
obligation bonds
|
Local issued
general obligation
bonds
|
Special revenue
bonds
|
Total
|
Percent of
total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Texas
|
$ | - | $ | 425 | $ | 107 | $ | 532 | 18.7 | % | ||||||||||
|
Indiana
|
- | 21 | 328 | 349 | 12.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Michigan
|
- | 245 | 12 | 257 | 9.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Illinois
|
- | 219 | 23 | 242 | 8.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Ohio
|
- | 131 | 107 | 238 | 8.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Washington
|
- | 166 | 32 | 198 | 6.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
Wisconsin
|
- | 116 | 19 | 135 | 4.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Florida
|
- | 19 | 67 | 86 | 3.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Pennsylvania
|
- | 67 | 9 | 76 | 2.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Arizona
|
- | 46 | 30 | 76 | 2.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Colorado
|
- | 37 | 15 | 52 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
New Jersey
|
- | 28 | 17 | 45 | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Kansas
|
- | 24 | 20 | 44 | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
New York
|
3 | 15 | 21 | 39 | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Utah
|
- | 20 | 17 | 37 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
All other states
|
- | 233 | 211 | 444 | 15.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 3 | $ | 1,812 | $ | 1,035 | $ | 2,850 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Texas
|
$ | - | $ | 455 | $ | 112 | $ | 567 | 19.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
Indiana
|
- | 21 | 356 | 377 | 12.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Michigan
|
- | 246 | 15 | 261 | 8.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Illinois
|
- | 223 | 28 | 251 | 8.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Ohio
|
- | 128 | 105 | 233 | 7.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
Washington
|
- | 170 | 39 | 209 | 7.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Wisconsin
|
- | 130 | 20 | 150 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Florida
|
- | 19 | 69 | 88 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
Arizona
|
- | 46 | 32 | 78 | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Pennsylvania
|
- | 67 | 10 | 77 | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Colorado
|
- | 37 | 16 | 53 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
Kansas
|
- | 23 | 21 | 44 | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
New Jersey
|
- | 25 | 17 | 42 | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Missouri
|
- | 19 | 21 | 40 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
New York
|
3 | 13 | 22 | 38 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
All other states
|
- | 263 | 221 | 484 | 16.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 3 | $ | 1,885 | $ | 1,104 | $ | 2,992 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
Percent of Publicly Traded Common Stock Portfolio
|
||||||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2010
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Cincinnati
Financial
|
S&P 500 Industry
Weightings
|
Cincinnati
Financial
|
S&P 500 Industry
Weightings
|
|||||||||||||
|
Sector:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Consumer staples
|
15.4 | % | 10.6 | % | 15.5 | % | 11.4 | % | ||||||||
|
Healthcare
|
14.1 | 10.9 | 18.0 | 12.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Information technology
|
13.0 | 18.7 | 11.0 | 19.8 | ||||||||||||
|
Energy
|
12.9 | 12.0 | 11.0 | 11.5 | ||||||||||||
|
Industrials
|
11.7 | 11.0 | 9.2 | 10.2 | ||||||||||||
|
Financial
|
11.7 | 16.1 | 10.2 | 14.4 | ||||||||||||
|
Consumer discretionary
|
8.3 | 10.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Materials
|
5.2 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Utilities
|
4.2 | 3.3 | 6.7 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Telecomm services
|
3.5 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
·
|
Insurance Holding Company Regulation – We are regulated as an insurance holding company system in the respective states of domicile of our standard market property casualty company subsidiary and its surplus lines and life insurance subsidiaries. These regulations require that we annually furnish financial and other information about the operations of the individual companies within the holding company system. All transactions within a holding company affecting insurers must be fair and equitable. Notice to the state insurance commissioner is required prior to the consummation of transactions affecting the ownership or control of an insurer and prior to certain material transactions between an insurer and any person or entity in its holding company group. In addition, some of those
transactions cannot be consummated without the commissioner’s prior approval.
|
|
|
·
|
Subsidiary Dividends – The Cincinnati Insurance Company is 100 percent owned by Cincinnati Financial Corporation. The dividend-paying capacity of The Cincinnati Insurance Company and its 100 percent owned subsidiaries is regulated by the laws of the applicable state of domicile. Under these laws, our insurance subsidiaries must provide a 10-day advance informational notice to the insurance commissioner for the domiciliary state prior to payment of any dividend or distribution to its shareholders. Generally, the most our insurance subsidiary can pay without prior regulatory approval is the greater of 10 percent of policyholder surplus or 100 percent of statutory net income for the prior calendar year. Dividends exceeding these limitations may be paid only with approval of
the insurance department of the domiciliary state.
|
|
|
·
|
Insurance Operations – All of our insurance subsidiaries are subject to licensing and supervision by departments of insurance in the states in which they do business. The nature and extent of such regulations vary, but generally have their source in statutes that delegate regulatory, supervisory and administrative powers to state insurance departments. Such regulations, supervision and administration of the insurance subsidiaries include, among others, the standards of solvency that must be met and maintained; the licensing of insurers and their agents and brokers; the nature and limitations on investments; deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders; regulation of standard market policy forms and premium rates; policy cancellations and non-renewals; periodic examination of
the affairs of insurance companies; annual and other reports required to be filed on the financial condition of insurers or for other purposes; requirements regarding reserves for unearned premiums, losses and other matters; the nature of and limitations on dividends to policyholders and shareholders; the nature and extent of required participation in insurance guaranty funds; the involuntary assumption of hard-to-place or high-risk insurance business, primarily workers’ compensation insurance; and the collection, remittance and reporting of certain taxes and fees. In 2010, our primary insurance regulators adopted the Model Audit Rule for annual statutory financial reporting. This regulation closely mirrors the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on matters such as auditor independence, corporate governance and internal controls over financial reporting. The regulation permits the audit committee
of Cincinnati Financial Corporation’s board of directors to also serve as the audit committee of each of our insurance subsidiaries for purposes of this regulation.
|
|
|
·
|
Insurance Guaranty Associations – Each state has insurance guaranty association laws under which the associations may assess life and property casualty insurers doing business in the state for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants. Typically, states assess each member insurer in an amount related to the insurer’s proportionate share of business written by all member insurers in the state. Our insurance companies received a savings of less than $3 million from guaranty associations in 2010 and a savings of less than $2 million in 2009. We cannot predict the amount and timing of any future assessments or refunds on our insurance subsidiaries under these laws.
|
|
|
·
|
Shared Market and Joint Underwriting Plans – State insurance regulation requires insurers to participate in assigned risk plans, reinsurance facilities and joint underwriting associations, which are mechanisms that generally provide applicants with various basic insurance coverages when they are not available in voluntary markets. Such mechanisms are most commonly instituted for automobile and workers’
|
|
|
·
|
Statutory Accounting – For public reporting, insurance companies prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP. However, certain data also must be calculated according to statutory accounting rules as defined in the NAIC’s Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual. While not a substitute for any GAAP measure of performance, statutory data frequently is used by industry analysts and other recognized reporting sources to facilitate comparisons of the performance of insurance companies.
|
|
|
·
|
Insurance Reserves – State insurance laws require that property casualty and life insurers annually analyze the adequacy of reserves. Our appointed actuaries must submit an opinion that reserves are adequate for policy claims-paying obligations and related expenses.
|
|
|
·
|
Risk-Based Capital Requirements – The NAIC’s risk-based capital (RBC) requirements for property casualty and life insurers serve as an early warning tool for the NAIC and state regulators to identify companies that may be undercapitalized and may merit further regulatory action. The NAIC has a standard formula for annually assessing RBC. The formula for calculating RBC for property casualty companies takes into account asset and credit risks but places more emphasis on underwriting factors for reserving and pricing. The formula for calculating RBC for life insurance companies takes into account factors relating to insurance, business, asset and interest rate risks.
|
|
|
·
|
Downgrade of the financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries. We believe our strong insurer financial strength ratings, in particular the A+ (Superior) rating from A.M. Best for our standard market property casualty insurance subsidiaries, are an important competitive advantage. Ratings agencies could change or expand their requirements. If our property casualty ratings were to be downgraded, our agents might find it more difficult to market our products or might choose to emphasize the products of other carriers. See Item 1, Our Business and Our Strategy,
Page 3
, for additional discussion of our financial strength ratings.
|
|
|
·
|
Concerns that doing business with us is difficult or not profitable, perceptions that our level of service is no longer a distinguishing characteristic in the marketplace, perceptions that our products do not meet the needs of our agents’ clients or perceptions that our business practices are not compatible with agents’ business models.
|
|
|
·
|
Delays in the development, implementation, performance and benefits of technology projects and enhancements or independent agent perceptions that our technology solutions are inadequate to match their needs.
|
|
|
·
|
Hurricanes in the gulf, eastern and southeastern coastal regions.
|
|
|
·
|
Earthquakes in the New Madrid fault zone, which lies within the central Mississippi valley, extending from northeast Arkansas through southeast Missouri, western Tennessee and western Kentucky to southern Illinois, southern Indiana and parts of Ohio.
|
|
|
·
|
Tornado, wind and hail in the Midwest, South, Southeast, Southwest and the mid-Atlantic.
|
|
|
·
|
Competitiveness of premiums charged
|
|
|
·
|
Relationships among carriers, agents, brokers and policyholders
|
|
|
·
|
Underwriting and pricing methodologies that allow insurers to identify and flexibly price risks
|
|
|
·
|
Compensation provided to agents
|
|
|
·
|
Underwriting discipline
|
|
|
·
|
Terms and conditions of insurance coverage
|
|
|
·
|
Speed with which products are brought to market
|
|
|
·
|
Product and marketing innovations, including advertising
|
|
|
·
|
Technological competence and innovation
|
|
|
·
|
Ability to control expenses
|
|
|
·
|
Adequacy of financial strength ratings by independent ratings agencies such as A.M. Best
|
|
|
·
|
Quality of services provided to agents and policyholders
|
|
|
·
|
Claims satisfaction and reputation
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Properties
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed and Reserved)
|
|
|
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
(Source: Nasdaq Global Select Market)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quarter:
|
1
st
|
2
nd
|
3
rd
|
4
th
|
1
st
|
2
nd
|
3
rd
|
4
th
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
High
|
$ | 29.65 | $ | 30.38 | $ | 29.39 | $ | 32.27 | $ | 29.66 | $ | 26.94 | $ | 26.31 | $ | 26.89 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Low
|
25.50 | 25.65 | 25.25 | 28.68 | 17.84 | 21.40 | 21.30 | 25.05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Period-end close
|
28.91 | 25.87 | 28.82 | 31.69 | 22.87 | 22.35 | 25.99 | 26.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash dividends declared
|
0.395 | 0.395 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.395 | 0.395 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Plan category
|
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights at
December 31, 2010
|
Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
|
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plan (excluding
securities reflected in column (a)) at
December 31, 2010
|
|||||||||
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
||||||||||
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
9,689,800 | $ | 36.59 | 5,980,147 | ||||||||
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
Total
|
9,689,800 | $ | 36.59 | 5,980,147 | ||||||||
|
Period
|
Total number
of shares
purchased
|
Average
price paid
per share
|
Total number of shares
purchased as part of
publicly announced
plans or programs
|
Maximum number of
shares that may yet be
purchased under the
plans or programs
|
||||||||||||
|
January 1-31, 2010
|
0 | $ | 0.00 | 0 | 9,044,097 | |||||||||||
|
February 1-28, 2010
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 9,044,097 | ||||||||||||
|
March 1-31, 2010
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 9,044,097 | ||||||||||||
|
April 1-30, 2010
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 9,044,097 | ||||||||||||
|
May 1-31, 2010
|
332,748 | 26.49 | 332,748 | 8,711,349 | ||||||||||||
|
June 1-30, 2010
|
45,000 | 26.49 | 45,000 | 8,666,349 | ||||||||||||
|
July 1-31, 2010
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 8,666,349 | ||||||||||||
|
August 1-31, 2010
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 8,666,349 | ||||||||||||
|
September 1-30, 2010
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 8,666,349 | ||||||||||||
|
October 1-31, 2010
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 8,666,349 | ||||||||||||
|
November 1-30, 2010
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 8,666,349 | ||||||||||||
|
December 1-31, 2010
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 8,666,349 | ||||||||||||
|
Totals
|
377,748 | 26.49 | 377,748 | |||||||||||||
|
(In millions except per share data)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Income Statement Data
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 3,082 | $ | 3,054 | $ | 3,136 | $ | 3,250 | ||||||||
|
Investment income, net of expenses
|
518 | 501 | 537 | 608 | ||||||||||||
|
Realized investment gains and losses*
|
159 | 336 | 138 | 382 | ||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
3,772 | 3,903 | 3,824 | 4,259 | ||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
377 | 432 | 429 | 855 | ||||||||||||
|
Net income per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 2.32 | $ | 2.66 | $ | 2.63 | $ | 5.01 | ||||||||
|
Diluted
|
2.31 | 2.65 | 2.62 | 4.97 | ||||||||||||
|
Cash dividends per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Declared
|
1.59 | 1.57 | 1.56 | 1.42 | ||||||||||||
|
Paid
|
1.585 | 1.565 | 1.525 | 1.40 | ||||||||||||
|
Shares Outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average, diluted
|
163 | 163 | 163 | 172 | ||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Invested assets
|
$ | 11,508 | $ | 10,643 | $ | 8,890 | $ | 12,261 | ||||||||
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
488 | 481 | 509 | 461 | ||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
15,095 | 14,440 | 13,369 | 16,637 | ||||||||||||
|
Gross loss and loss expense reserves
|
4,200 | 4,142 | 4,086 | 3,967 | ||||||||||||
|
Life policy reserves
|
2,034 | 1,783 | 1,551 | 1,478 | ||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
790 | 790 | 791 | 791 | ||||||||||||
|
Shareholders' equity
|
5,032 | 4,760 | 4,182 | 5,929 | ||||||||||||
|
Book value per share
|
30.91 | 29.25 | 25.75 | 35.70 | ||||||||||||
|
Value creation ratio
|
11.1 | % | 19.7 | % | (23.5 | ) % | (5.7 | ) % | ||||||||
|
Consolidated Property Casualty Operations
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 2,924 | $ | 2,911 | $ | 3,010 | $ | 3,125 | ||||||||
|
Unearned premiums
|
1,551 | 1,507 | 1,542 | 1,562 | ||||||||||||
|
Gross loss and loss expense reserves
|
4,137 | 4,096 | 4,040 | 3,925 | ||||||||||||
|
Investment income, net of expenses
|
348 | 336 | 350 | 393 | ||||||||||||
|
Loss ratio
|
56.5 | % | 58.6 | % | 57.7 | % | 46.6 | % | ||||||||
|
Loss expense ratio
|
12.4 | 13.1 | 10.6 | 12.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Underwriting expense ratio
|
32.8 | 32.8 | 32.3 | 31.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Combined ratio
|
101.7 | % | 104.5 | % | 100.6 | % | 90.3 | % | ||||||||
|
|
*
|
Realized investment gains and losses are integral to our financial results over the long term, but our substantial discretion in the timing of investment sales may cause this value to fluctuate substantially. Also, applicable accounting standards require us to recognize gains and losses from certain changes in fair values of securities and embedded derivatives without actual realization of those gains and losses. We discuss realized investment gains for the past three years in Item 7, Investments Results of Operations,
Page 75
.
|
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 3,278 | $ | 3,164 | $ | 3,020 | $ | 2,748 | $ | 2,478 | $ | 2,152 | $ | 1,907 | |||||||||||||
| 570 | 526 | 492 | 465 | 445 | 421 | 415 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 684 | 61 | 91 | (41 | ) | (94 | ) | (25 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| 4,550 | 3,767 | 3,614 | 3,181 | 2,843 | 2,561 | 2,331 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 930 | 602 | 584 | 374 | 238 | 193 | 118 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 5.36 | $ | 3.44 | $ | 3.30 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 1.33 | $ | 1.10 | $ | 0.67 | |||||||||||||
| 5.30 | 3.40 | 3.28 | 2.10 | 1.32 | 1.07 | 0.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1.34 | 1.205 | 1.04 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1.31 | 1.162 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 175 | 177 | 178 | 178 | 180 | 179 | 181 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 13,759 | $ | 12,702 | $ | 12,677 | $ | 12,485 | $ | 11,226 | $ | 11,534 | $ | 11,276 | |||||||||||||
| 453 | 429 | 400 | 372 | 343 | 286 | 259 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 17,222 | 16,003 | 16,107 | 15,509 | 14,122 | 13,964 | 13,274 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3,896 | 3,661 | 3,549 | 3,415 | 3,176 | 2,887 | 2,473 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,409 | 1,343 | 1,194 | 1,025 | 917 | 724 | 641 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 791 | 791 | 791 | 420 | 420 | 426 | 449 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6,808 | 6,086 | 6,249 | 6,204 | 5,598 | 5,998 | 5,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 39.38 | 34.88 | 35.60 | 35.10 | 31.43 | 33.62 | 33.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 16.7 | % | 1.4 | % | 4.4 | % | 14.5 | % | (4.1 | ) % | 1.7 | % | 13.6 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 3,164 | $ | 3,058 | $ | 2,919 | $ | 2,653 | $ | 2,391 | $ | 2,073 | $ | 1,828 | |||||||||||||
| 1,576 | 1,557 | 1,537 | 1,444 | 1,317 | 1,060 | 920 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3,860 | 3,629 | 3,514 | 3,386 | 3,150 | 2,894 | 2,416 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 367 | 338 | 289 | 245 | 234 | 223 | 223 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 51.9 | % | 49.2 | % | 49.8 | % | 56.1 | % | 61.5 | % | 66.6 | % | 71.1 | ||||||||||||||
| 11.6 | 10.0 | 10.3 | 11.6 | 11.4 | 10.1 | 11.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 30.8 | 30.0 | 29.7 | 27.0 | 26.8 | 28.2 | 30.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 94.3 | % | 89.2 | % | 89.8 | % | 94.7 | % | 99.7 | % | 104.9 | % | 112.8 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
One
|
Three-year
|
Five-year
|
||||||||||
|
year
|
% average
|
% average
|
||||||||||
|
Value creation ratio
|
||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
11.1 | % | 2.4 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
19.7 | (3.2 | ) | 1.7 | ||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
(23.5 | ) | (4.2 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||
|
|
·
|
Premium growth – We believe over any five-year period our agency relationships and initiatives can lead to a property casualty written premium growth rate that exceeds the industry average. The compound annual growth rate of our net written premiums was negative 0.7 percent over the five-year period 2006 through 2010, slightly lower than the negative 0.5 percent estimated growth rate for the property casualty insurance industry.
|
|
|
·
|
Combined ratio – We believe our underwriting philosophy and initiatives can generate a GAAP combined ratio over any five-year period that is consistently below 100 percent. Our GAAP combined ratio has averaged 98.3 percent over the five-year period 2006 through 2010. Our combined ratio was below 100 percent in 2006 and 2007, but was above 100 percent for 2008 through 2010, when we averaged 102.3 percent, including an average catastrophe loss ratio that was 2.1 percentage points higher than the average for the 10-year period prior to 2008. Performance as measured by the combined ratio is discussed in Consolidated Property Casualty Insurance Results of Operations,
Page 49
. Our
statutory combined ratio averaged 98.2 percent over the five-year period 2006 through 2010 compared with an estimated 99.5 percent for the property casualty industry.
|
|
|
·
|
Investment contribution - We believe our investment philosophy and initiatives can drive investment income growth and lead to a total return on our equity investment portfolio over a five-year period that exceeds the five-year return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
|
|
|
o
|
Investment income growth, on a before-tax basis, declined at a compound annual rate of 0.3 percent over the five-year period 2006 through 2010. It grew in each year except 2008 and 2009, when we experienced a dramatic reduction in dividend payouts by financial services companies held in our equity portfolio, a risk we addressed aggressively during 2008, completing that effort in early 2009.
|
|
|
o
|
Over the five years ended December 31, 2010, our compound annual equity portfolio return was a negative 3.0 percent compared with a compound annual total return of 2.3 percent for the Index. Our equity portfolio underperformed the market for the five-year period primarily because of the 2008 decline in the market value of our previously large holdings in the financial services sector. For the year 2010, our compound annual equity portfolio return was 11.0 percent, compared with 15.1 percent for the Index, as the broad market rally did not favor the higher quality, dividend-paying stocks we prefer.
|
|
|
·
|
Improve insurance profitability – Implementation of these initiatives is intended to improve pricing capabilities for our property casualty business, increasing our ability to manage our business while also enhancing our efficiency. Improved pricing capabilities through the use of technology and analytics can lead to better profit margins. Improved planning for growth and profitability plans can enhance our ability to achieve objectives at all levels in the organization. Improved internal processes with additional performance metrics can help us be more efficient and effective. These initiatives also support the ability of the agencies that represent us to grow profitably by allowing them to serve clients faster and to more efficiently manage agency expenses.
|
|
|
·
|
Drive premium growth – Implementation of these initiatives is intended to further penetrate each market we serve through our independent agency network. Strategies aimed at specific market opportunities, along with service enhancements, can help our agents grow and increase our share of their business. Diversified growth also may reduce variability of losses from weather-related catastrophes.
|
|
|
·
|
The rally in financial markets during 2009 and 2010 had a highly favorable impact on our value creation ratio, offsetting much of the unfavorable impact of the sharp decline in financial markets during 2008. Should financial markets decline during 2011, which could occur as part of typical market volatility patterns, the related component of our 2011 value creation ratio could also register a weak or negative result.
|
|
|
·
|
Lingering effects of soft insurance market pricing are expected to affect growth rates and earned premium levels into 2011 and for some time into the future, depending on insurance market conditions. Current conditions continue to weaken loss ratios and hamper near-term profitability. Economic factors, including inflation, may increase our claims and settlement expenses related to medical care, litigation and construction.
|
|
|
·
|
The slowly recovering economy is expected to continue to affect policyholders by minimizing growth in value of their business and personal insurable assets. Until the economy significantly strengthens, we may experience only modest premium growth for the property casualty industry or our commercial lines segment, which represented approximately 73 percent of our 2010 property casualty net written premiums. Property casualty written premium growth also may lag as some of our growth initiatives require more time to reach their full contribution.
|
|
|
·
|
We will incur the cost of continued investment in our business, including technology, recent entry in new states and process initiatives to create long-term value. In addition, we will not see the full advantage of many of these investments for several years.
|
|
|
·
|
We expect the insurance marketplace to remain competitive, which is likely to cause carriers to pursue strategies that they believe could lead to economies of scale, market share gains or the potential for an improved competitive posture.
|
|
|
·
|
We expect the independent insurance agency system to remain strong and viable, with continued agency consolidation, especially as agency margins come under more pressure due to soft pricing and the difficult economic environment. The soft commercial market that has extended into 2011 creates additional risk for agencies. We expect the soft market to continue for much of 2011, or perhaps longer, particularly in non-catastrophe-event-prone states and lines of business, absent a significant event or events.
|
|
|
·
|
We expect initiatives that make it easier for agents to do business with us will continue to be a significant factor in agency relationships, with technology being a major driver. Policyholders will increasingly demand online services and access from agents or carriers.
|
|
(Dollars in millions except share data)
|
At December 31,
|
At December 31,
|
||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
Balance sheet data
|
||||||||
|
Invested assets
|
$ | 11,508 | $ | 10,643 | ||||
|
Total assets
|
15,095 | 14,440 | ||||||
|
Short-term debt
|
49 | 49 | ||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
790 | 790 | ||||||
|
Shareholders' equity
|
5,032 | 4,760 | ||||||
|
Book value per share
|
30.91 | 29.25 | ||||||
|
Debt-to-total-capital ratio
|
14.3 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||
|
(Dollars in millions except share data)
|
Twelve months ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Income statement data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 3,082 | $ | 3,054 | $ | 3,136 | 1 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Investment income, net of expenses (pretax)
|
518 | 501 | 537 | 3 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Realized investment gains and losses (pretax)
|
159 | 336 | 138 | (53 | ) | 143 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
3,772 | 3,903 | 3,824 | (3 | ) | 2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
377 | 432 | 429 | (13 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
|
Per share data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income - diluted
|
$ | 2.31 | $ | 2.65 | $ | 2.62 | (13 | ) | 1 | |||||||||||
|
Cash dividends declared
|
1.59 | 1.57 | 1.56 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
163,274,491 | 162,866,863 | 163,362,409 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated property casualty highlights
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 2,963 | $ | 2,911 | $ | 3,010 | 2 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
2,924 | 2,911 | 3,010 | 0 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting loss
|
(47 | ) | (128 | ) | (16 | ) | 63 |
nm
|
||||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
GAAP combined ratio
|
101.7 | % | 104.5 | % | 100.6 | % | (2.8 | ) | 3.9 | |||||||||||
|
Statutory combined ratio
|
101.8 | 104.4 | 100.4 | (2.6 | ) | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Written premium to statutory surplus
|
0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.0 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
type of claim involved
|
|
|
·
|
circumstances surrounding each claim
|
|
|
·
|
policy provisions pertaining to each claim
|
|
|
·
|
potential for subrogation or salvage recoverable
|
|
|
·
|
general insurance reserving practices
|
|
|
·
|
For weather events designated as catastrophes, we calculate IBNR reserves directly as a result of an estimated IBNR claim count and an estimated average claim amount for each event. Once case reserves are established for a weather event we reduce the IBNR reserves. Our claims department management coordinates the assessment of these events and prepares the related IBNR reserve estimates. Such an assessment involves a comprehensive analysis of the nature of the storm, of policyholder exposures within the affected geographic area and of available claims intelligence. Depending on the nature of the event, available claims intelligence could include surveys of field claims associates within the affected geographic area, feedback from a catastrophe claims team sent into the area, as well as data on
claims reported as of the financial statement date. We generally use the catastrophe definition provided by Property Claims Service (PCS), a division of Insurance Services Office (ISO). PCS defines a catastrophe as an event that causes countrywide damage of $25 million or more in insured property losses and affects a significant number of policyholders and insureds.
|
|
|
·
|
For asbestos and environmental claims, we calculate IBNR reserves by deriving an actuarially based estimate of total unpaid loss and loss expenses. We then reduce the estimate by total case reserves. We discuss the reserve analysis that applies to asbestos and environmental reserves in Asbestos and Environmental Reserves,
Page 84
.
|
|
|
·
|
For all other claims and events, IBNR reserves are calculated as the difference between an actuarial estimate of the ultimate cost of total loss and loss expenses incurred reduced by the sum of total loss and loss expense payments and total case reserves estimated for individual claims. We discuss below the development of actuarially based estimates of the ultimate cost of total loss and loss expenses incurred.
|
|
|
·
|
paid and reported loss development methods
|
|
|
·
|
paid and reported loss Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods
|
|
|
·
|
individual and multiple probabilistic trend family models
|
|
|
·
|
company and industry pricing
|
|
|
·
|
company and industry exposure
|
|
|
·
|
company and industry loss frequency and severity
|
|
|
·
|
past large loss events such as hurricanes
|
|
|
·
|
company and industry premium
|
|
|
·
|
company in-force policy count
|
|
|
·
|
large loss activity and trends in large losses
|
|
|
·
|
new business activity
|
|
|
·
|
judicial decisions
|
|
|
·
|
general economic trends such as inflation
|
|
|
·
|
trends in litigiousness and legal expenses
|
|
|
·
|
product and underwriting changes
|
|
|
·
|
changes in claims practices
|
|
|
·
|
Emergence of loss and allocated loss expenses on an accident year basis. Historical paid loss, reported loss and paid allocated loss expense data for the business lines we analyze contain patterns that reflect how unpaid losses, unreported losses and unpaid allocated loss expenses as of a financial statement date will emerge in the future on an accident year basis. Unless our actuarial staff or management identifies reasons or factors that invalidate the extension of historical patterns into the future, these patterns can be used to make projections necessary for estimating IBNR reserves. Our actuaries significantly rely on this assumption in the application of all methods and models mentioned above.
|
|
|
·
|
Calendar year inflation. For long-tail and mid-tail business lines, calendar year inflation trends for future paid losses and paid allocated loss expenses will not vary significantly from a stable, long-term average. Our actuaries base reserve estimates derived from probabilistic trend family models on this assumption.
|
|
|
·
|
Exposure levels. Historical earned premiums, when adjusted to reflect common levels of product pricing and loss cost inflation, can serve as a proxy for historical exposures. Our actuaries require this assumption to estimate expected loss ratios and expected allocated loss expense ratios used by the Bornhuetter-Ferguson reserving methods. They also use this assumption to establish exposure levels for recent accident years, characterized by “green” or immature data, when working with probabilistic trend family models.
|
|
|
·
|
Claims having atypical emergence patterns. Characteristics of certain subsets of claims, such as high frequency, high severity, or mass tort claims, have the potential to distort patterns contained in historical paid loss, reported loss and paid allocated loss expense data. When testing indicates this to be the case for a particular subset of claims, our actuaries segregate these claims from the data and analyze them separately. Subsets of claims that could fall into this category include hurricane claims, individual large claims and asbestos and environmental claims.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Net loss and loss expense range of reserves
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Carried
|
Low
|
High
|
Standard
|
Net income
|
||||||||||||||||
|
reserves
|
point
|
point
|
error
|
effect
|
||||||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 3,811 | $ | 3,571 | $ | 3,952 | ||||||||||||||
|
Commercial casualty
|
$ | 1,644 | $ | 1,455 | $ | 1,781 | $ | 163 | $ | 106 | ||||||||||
|
Commercial property
|
155 | 136 | 176 | 20 | 13 | |||||||||||||||
|
Commercial auto
|
356 | 336 | 376 | 20 | 13 | |||||||||||||||
|
Workers' compensation
|
1,010 | 906 | 1,079 | 87 | 57 | |||||||||||||||
|
Personal auto
|
153 | 145 | 161 | 8 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Homeowners
|
105 | 95 | 114 | 9 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 3,661 | $ | 3,459 | $ | 3,774 | ||||||||||||||
|
Commercial casualty
|
$ | 1,605 | $ | 1,459 | $ | 1,691 | $ | 116 | $ | 75 | ||||||||||
|
Commercial property
|
115 | 93 | 136 | 21 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
|
Commercial auto
|
374 | 355 | 393 | 19 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
|
Workers' compensation
|
975 | 887 | 1,035 | 74 | 48 | |||||||||||||||
|
Personal auto
|
154 | 146 | 161 | 8 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Homeowners
|
89 | 80 | 98 | 9 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Commercial lines property casualty insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Personal lines property casualty insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Excess and surplus lines property casualty insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Investments
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 2,924 | $ | 2,911 | $ | 3,010 | 0 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Fee revenues
|
4 | 3 | 3 | 33 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total premiums and fee revenues
|
2,928 | 2,914 | 3,013 | 0 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
2,154 | 2,102 | 2,174 | 2 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
165 | 172 | 205 | (4 | ) | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(287 | ) | (181 | ) | (321 | ) | (59 | ) | 44 | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(17 | ) | (7 | ) | (2 | ) | (143 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
2,015 | 2,086 | 2,056 | (3 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting expenses
|
960 | 956 | 973 | 0 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting loss
|
$ | (47 | ) | $ | (128 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | 63 |
nm
|
|||||||||
|
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
73.6 | % | 72.2 | % | 72.2 | % | 1.4 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
5.6 | 5.9 | 6.8 | (0.3 | ) | (0.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(9.8 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (10.7 | ) | (3.6 | ) | 4.5 | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(0.5 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 0.0 | (0.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
68.9 | 71.7 | 68.3 | (2.8 | ) | 3.4 | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting expenses
|
32.8 | 32.8 | 32.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Combined ratio
|
101.7 | % | 104.5 | % | 100.6 | % | (2.8 | ) | 3.9 | |||||||||||
|
Combined ratio:
|
101.7 | % | 104.5 | % | 100.6 | % | (2.8 | ) | 3.9 | |||||||||||
|
Contribution from catastrophe losses and prior years reserve development
|
(4.7 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (3.9 | ) | (4.2 | ) | 3.4 | |||||||||||
|
Combined ratio before catastrophe losses and prior years reserve development
|
106.4 | % | 105.0 | % | 104.5 | % | 1.4 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Premiums – Higher 2010 renewal and new business written premiums were driven by growth in our personal lines and excess and surplus lines segments. Changes in written and earned premiums over the past three years generally reflected intense price competition partially offset by fairly stable policy retention rates for renewal business and growth in new business. New business written premiums increased in each of the past three years, largely due to the contribution of new agency appointments – in both new and existing states of operation; the contribution of our excess and surplus lines business; and more competitive personal lines pricing that included net rate increases since late 2009. Other written premiums primarily include premiums ceded to our reinsurers as part of our
reinsurance program. The table below analyzes premium revenue components and trends. Premium trends by segment are further discussed beginning on
Page 12
,
Page 15
and
Page 16
, for the respective property casualty segments.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Agency renewal written premiums
|
$ | 2,692 | $ | 2,665 | $ | 2,828 | 1 | (6 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Agency new business written premiums
|
414 | 405 | 368 | 2 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other written premiums
|
(143 | ) | (159 | ) | (186 | ) | 10 | 15 | ||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
2,963 | 2,911 | 3,010 | 2 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Unearned premium change
|
(39 | ) | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 2,924 | $ | 2,911 | $ | 3,010 | 0 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Combined ratio – The 2010 combined ratio improved 2.8 percentage points to 101.7 percent, lowering the 2009 underwriting loss by more than half. The 1.4 percentage point increase in the ratio for current accident year losses and loss expenses was offset by a larger benefit from net favorable reserve development on prior accident years and lower catastrophe losses. Components of the combined ratio are discussed below, followed by additional discussion by segment.
|
|
(In millions, net of reinsurance)
|
Excess
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
Personal
|
and surplus
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates
|
Cause of loss
|
Region
|
lines
|
lines
|
lines
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jan. 7-12
|
Freezing, wind
|
South, Midwest
|
$ | 4 | $ | 1 | $ | - | $ | 5 | ||||||||||
|
Feb. 9-11
|
Ice, snow, wind
|
East, Midwest
|
4 | 1 | - | 5 | ||||||||||||||
|
Apr. 4-6
|
Flood, hail, tornado, wind
|
South, Midwest
|
4 | 6 | - | 10 | ||||||||||||||
|
Apr. 30 - May 3
|
Flood, hail, tornado, wind
|
South
|
21 | 6 | - | 27 | ||||||||||||||
|
May 7-8
|
Hail, tornado, wind
|
East, Midwest
|
2 | 12 | - | 14 | ||||||||||||||
|
May 12-16
|
Flood, hail, tornado, wind
|
South, Midwest
|
7 | 2 | - | 9 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 4-6
|
Flood, hail, tornado, wind
|
Midwest
|
2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 17-20
|
Flood, hail, tornado, wind
|
Midwest, West
|
5 | 3 | - | 8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 21-24
|
Flood, hail, tornado, wind
|
Midwest
|
2 | 3 | - | 5 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 25-28
|
Flood, hail, tornado, wind
|
Midwest
|
3 | 5 | - | 8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 30 - Jul. 1
|
Hail, wind
|
West
|
4 | 4 | - | 8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jul. 20-23
|
Flood, hail, tornado, wind
|
Midwest
|
12 | 4 | - | 16 | ||||||||||||||
|
Oct. 4-6
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
South
|
6 | 1 | - | 7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Oct. 26-28
|
Flood, hail, tornado, wind
|
Midwest
|
6 | 4 | - | 10 | ||||||||||||||
|
All other 2010 catastrophes
|
19 | 9 | - | 28 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Development on 2009 and prior catastrophes
|
(12 | ) | (5 | ) | - | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Calendar year incurred total
|
$ | 89 | $ | 58 | $ | 1 | $ | 148 | ||||||||||||
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jan. 26-28
|
Flood, freezing, ice, snow
|
South, Midwest
|
$ | 5 | $ | 14 | $ | - | $ | 19 | ||||||||||
|
Feb. 10-13
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
South, Midwest
|
13 | 25 | - | 38 | ||||||||||||||
|
Feb. 18-19
|
Hail, wind
|
South
|
1 | 8 | - | 9 | ||||||||||||||
|
Apr. 9-11
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
South, Midwest
|
13 | 21 | - | 34 | ||||||||||||||
|
May 7-9
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
South, Midwest
|
9 | 13 | - | 22 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 2-6
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
South, Midwest
|
3 | 4 | - | 7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 10-18
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
South, Midwest
|
7 | 4 | - | 11 | ||||||||||||||
|
Sep. 18-22
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
South
|
3 | 4 | - | 7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other 2009 catastrophes
|
12 | 13 | - | 25 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Development on 2008 and prior catastrophes
|
(12 | ) | 5 | - | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Calendar year incurred total
|
$ | 54 | $ | 111 | $ | - | $ | 165 | ||||||||||||
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jan. 4-9
|
Flood, freezing, hail, wind
|
South, Midwest
|
$ | 4 | $ | 2 | $ | - | $ | 6 | ||||||||||
|
Jan. 29-30
|
Hail, wind
|
Midwest
|
5 | 4 | - | 9 | ||||||||||||||
|
Feb. 5-6
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
Midwest
|
5 | 8 | - | 13 | ||||||||||||||
|
Mar. 15-16
|
Hail, wind
|
South
|
2 | 8 | - | 10 | ||||||||||||||
|
Apr. 9-11
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
South
|
17 | 2 | - | 19 | ||||||||||||||
|
May 1
|
Hail, wind
|
South
|
5 | 1 | - | 6 | ||||||||||||||
|
May 10-12
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
South, Mid-Atlantic
|
3 | 4 | - | 7 | ||||||||||||||
|
May 22-26
|
Hail, wind
|
Midwest
|
4 | 3 | - | 7 | ||||||||||||||
|
May 29- Jun 1
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
Midwest
|
4 | 4 | - | 8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 2-4
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
Midwest
|
6 | 4 | - | 10 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 5-8
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
Midwest
|
8 | 6 | - | 14 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jun. 11-12
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
Midwest
|
10 | 4 | - | 14 | ||||||||||||||
|
Jul. 26
|
Flood, hail, wind
|
Midwest
|
1 | 7 | - | 8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Sep. 12-14
|
Hurricane Ike
|
South, Midwest
|
22 | 36 | - | 58 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other 2008 catastrophes
|
10 | 6 | - | 16 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Development on 2007 and prior catastrophes
|
(3 | ) | 1 | - | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Calendar year incurred total
|
$ | 103 | $ | 100 | $ | - | $ | 203 | ||||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 2,319 | $ | 2,084 | $ | 2,148 | 79.2 | % | 71.6 | % | 71.4 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
2,274 | 2,224 | 78.1 | 73.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
2,379 | 79.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
New losses greater than $4,000,000
|
$ | 49 | $ | 57 | $ | 46 | (14 | ) | 24 | |||||||||||
|
New losses $1,000,000-$4,000,000
|
142 | 147 | 169 | (3 | ) | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
New losses $250,000-$1,000,000
|
200 | 212 | 228 | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Case reserve development above $250,000
|
178 | 265 | 245 | (33 | ) | 8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total large losses incurred
|
569 | 681 | 688 | (16 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Other losses excluding catastrophe losses
|
935 | 860 | 845 | 9 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Catastrophe losses
|
148 | 165 | 203 | (10 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Total losses incurred
|
$ | 1,652 | $ | 1,706 | $ | 1,736 | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
New losses greater than $4,000,000
|
1.7 | % | 2.0 | % | 1.5 | % | (0.3 | ) | 0.5 | |||||||||||
|
New losses $1,000,000-$4,000,000
|
4.8 | 5.1 | 5.6 | (0.3 | ) | (0.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
New losses $250,000-$1,000,000
|
6.8 | 7.3 | 7.6 | (0.5 | ) | (0.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Case reserve development above $250,000
|
6.1 | 9.0 | 8.1 | (2.9 | ) | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total large loss ratio
|
19.4 | 23.4 | 22.8 | (4.0 | ) | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other losses excluding catastrophe losses
|
32.0 | 29.5 | 28.1 | 2.5 | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Catastrophe losses
|
5.1 | 5.7 | 6.8 | (0.6 | ) | (1.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Total loss ratio
|
56.5 | % | 58.6 | % | 57.7 | % | (2.1 | ) | 0.9 | |||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commission expenses
|
$ | 544 | $ | 550 | $ | 555 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
402 | 389 | 403 | 3 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Policyholder dividends
|
14 | 17 | 15 | (18 | ) | 13 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total underwriting expenses
|
$ | 960 | $ | 956 | $ | 973 | 0 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commission expenses
|
18.6 | % | 18.9 | % | 18.4 | % | (0.3 | ) | 0.5 | |||||||||||
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
13.7 | 13.3 | 13.4 | 0.4 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Policyholder dividends
|
0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total underwriting expense ratio
|
32.8 | % | 32.8 | % | 32.3 | % | 0.0 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 2,154 | $ | 2,199 | $ | 2,316 | (2 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Fee revenues
|
2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total premiums and fee revenues
|
2,156 | 2,201 | 2,318 | (2 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
1,605 | 1,596 | 1,671 | 1 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
101 | 66 | 106 | 53 | (38 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(257 | ) | (135 | ) | (270 | ) | (90 | ) | 50 | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(12 | ) | (12 | ) | (3 | ) | 0 | (300 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
1,437 | 1,515 | 1,504 | (5 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting expenses
|
704 | 719 | 742 | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Underwriting profit (loss)
|
$ | 15 | $ | (33 | ) | $ | 72 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
74.5 | % | 72.5 | % | 72.1 | % | 2.0 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
4.7 | 3.0 | 4.6 | 1.7 | (1.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(11.9 | ) | (6.1 | ) | (11.7 | ) | (5.8 | ) | 5.6 | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(0.6 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
66.7 | 68.9 | 64.9 | (2.2 | ) | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting expenses
|
32.7 | 32.7 | 32.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Combined ratio
|
99.4 | % | 101.6 | % | 97.0 | % | (2.2 | ) | 4.6 | |||||||||||
|
Combined ratio:
|
99.4 | % | 101.6 | % | 97.0 | % | (2.2 | ) | 4.6 | |||||||||||
|
Contribution from catastrophe losses and prior years reserve development
|
(7.8 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (7.2 | ) | (4.2 | ) | 3.6 | |||||||||||
|
Combined ratio before catastrophe losses and prior years reserve development
|
107.2 | % | 105.2 | % | 104.2 | % | 2.0 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Premiums – Pricing in the commercial lines marketplace again reflected very strong competition, driving modest declines for both renewal and new business premiums. Our commercial lines net written premium decrease for 2010 of 1 percent compared favorably with the estimated decline of 2 percent for the overall commercial lines industry, similar to the 2009 comparison when our decline of 6 percent was slightly better than the decrease estimated for the commercial lines segment of the industry at 8 percent. We believe our pace for new and renewal business in recent years is consistent with our agents’ practice of selecting and retaining accounts with manageable risk characteristics that support the lower prevailing prices. We also believe our favorable
comparison to the industry in recent years reflects our premium growth initiatives and the advantages we achieve through our field focus, which provides us with quality intelligence on local market conditions. Our earned premiums declined in 2010 and 2009, following the pattern of our written premiums.
|
|
|
·
|
Combined ratio – For our commercial lines segment, the 2010 combined ratio improved 2.2 percentage points to 99.4 percent, and the segment generated a small underwriting profit. Modest increases in the ratios for catastrophes and current accident year losses and loss expenses were offset by a larger benefit from net favorable reserve development on prior accident years. That larger benefit was accounted for almost entirely by our workers’ compensation and commercial casualty lines of business. We continue to focus on sound underwriting fundamentals and obtaining adequate premiums for risks insured by each individual policy. Predictive analytics for better pricing precision have been used for our workers’ compensation line of business since the second half of 2009. We
plan to deploy in 2011 similar tools for our commercial auto, general liability and commercial property lines.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Agency renewal written premiums
|
$ | 1,978 | $ | 2,013 | $ | 2,156 | (2 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Agency new business written premiums
|
289 | 298 | 312 | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Other written premiums
|
(112 | ) | (130 | ) | (157 | ) | 14 | 17 | ||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
2,155 | 2,181 | 2,311 | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Unearned premium change
|
(1 | ) | 18 | 5 |
nm
|
260 | ||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 2,154 | $ | 2,199 | $ | 2,316 | (2 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
Change %
|
|||||||||||||
|
New business written premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Texas
|
$ | 19 | $ | 11 | $ | 8 | 73 | |||||||||
|
Colorado
|
8 | 1 | 7 | 700 | ||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
27 | 12 | 15 | 125 | ||||||||||||
|
All other states
|
262 | 286 | (24 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 289 | $ | 298 | $ | (9 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
|
Net written premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Texas
|
$ | 30 | $ | 11 | $ | 19 | 173 | |||||||||
|
Colorado
|
10 | 1 | 9 | 900 | ||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
40 | 12 | 28 | 233 | ||||||||||||
|
All other states
|
2,115 | 2,169 | (54 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,155 | $ | 2,181 | $ | (26 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 1,706 | $ | 1,485 | $ | 1,582 | 79.2 | % | 67.5 | % | 68.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
1,662 | 1,644 | 75.5 | 71.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
1,777 | 76.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
New losses greater than $4,000,000
|
$ | 44 | $ | 52 | $ | 41 | (15 | ) | 27 | |||||||||||
|
New losses $1,000,000-$4,000,000
|
120 | 130 | 153 | (8 | ) | (15 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
New losses $250,000-$1,000,000
|
148 | 164 | 184 | (10 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Case reserve development above $250,000
|
164 | 245 | 229 | (33 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total large losses incurred
|
476 | 591 | 607 | (19 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Other losses excluding catastrophe losses
|
587 | 565 | 547 | 4 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
|
Catastrophe losses
|
89 | 54 | 103 | 65 | (47 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Total losses incurred
|
$ | 1,152 | $ | 1,210 | $ | 1,257 | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
New losses greater than $4,000,000
|
2.0 | % | 2.4 | % | 1.8 | % | (0.4 | ) | 0.6 | |||||||||||
|
New losses $1,000,000-$4,000,000
|
5.6 | 5.9 | 6.6 | (0.3 | ) | (0.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
New losses $250,000-$1,000,000
|
6.9 | 7.5 | 8.0 | (0.6 | ) | (0.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Case reserve development above $250,000
|
7.6 | 11.2 | 9.9 | (3.6 | ) | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total large loss ratio
|
22.1 | 27.0 | 26.3 | (4.9 | ) | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other losses excluding catastrophe losses
|
27.3 | 25.7 | 23.4 | 1.6 | 2.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
Catastrophe losses
|
4.1 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 1.6 | (2.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Total loss ratio
|
53.5 | % | 55.2 | % | 54.2 | % | (1.7 | ) | 1.0 | |||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commission expenses
|
$ | 391 | $ | 408 | $ | 417 | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
299 | 294 | 310 | 2 | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Policyholder dividends
|
14 | 17 | 15 | (18 | ) | 13 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total underwriting expenses
|
$ | 704 | $ | 719 | $ | 742 | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commission expenses
|
18.2 | % | 18.6 | % | 18.0 | % | (0.4 | ) | 0.6 | |||||||||||
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
13.8 | 13.3 | 13.5 | 0.5 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Policyholder dividends
|
0.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | (0.1 | ) | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total underwriting expense ratio
|
32.7 | % | 32.7 | % | 32.1 | % | 0.0 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial casualty:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 686 | $ | 704 | $ | 764 | (3 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
693 | 712 | 763 | (3 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
555 | 542 | 576 | 2 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(186 | ) | (154 | ) | (257 | ) | (21 | ) | 40 | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 369 | $ | 388 | $ | 319 | (5 | ) | 22 | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
80.1 | % | 76.2 | % | 75.4 | % | 3.9 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(26.9 | ) | (21.6 | ) | (33.7 | ) | (5.3 | ) | 12.1 | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
53.2 | % | 54.6 | % | 41.7 | % | (1.4 | ) | 12.9 | |||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 555 | $ | 437 | $ | 436 | 80.1 | % | 61.4 | % | 57.1 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
542 | 488 | 76.2 | 63.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
576 | 75.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial property:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 497 | $ | 485 | $ | 481 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
489 | 485 | 487 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
286 | 257 | 282 | 11 | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
75 | 42 | 81 | 79 | (48 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(3 | ) | (5 | ) | (7 | ) | 40 | 29 | ||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(7 | ) | (11 | ) | (3 | ) | 36 | (267 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 351 | $ | 283 | $ | 353 | 24 | (20 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
58.4 | % | 53.1 | % | 57.7 | % | 5.3 | (4.6 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
15.4 | 8.8 | 16.6 | 6.6 | (7.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(0.6 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (1.3 | ) | 0.5 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(1.4 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 0.8 | (1.8 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
71.8 | % | 58.6 | % | 72.6 | % | 13.2 | (14.0 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 361 | $ | 291 | $ | 349 | 73.8 | % | 60.2 | % | 71.6 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
299 | 348 | 61.9 | 71.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
363 | 74.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial auto:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 385 | $ | 388 | $ | 402 | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
384 | 394 | 411 | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
269 | 273 | 303 | (1 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
4 | 3 | 2 | 33 | 50 | |||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(32 | ) | (20 | ) | (8 | ) | (60 | ) | (150 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(1 | ) | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 240 | $ | 256 | $ | 297 | (6 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
70.0 | % | 69.2 | % | 73.7 | % | 0.8 | (4.5 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
1.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(8.2 | ) | (5.0 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (3.2 | ) | (3.0 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(0.3 | ) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (0.3 | ) | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
62.6 | % | 64.9 | % | 72.3 | % | (2.3 | ) | (7.4 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 273 | $ | 253 | $ | 283 | 71.1 | % | 64.2 | % | 68.9 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
276 | 292 | 69.9 | 71.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
305 | 74.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Workers' compensation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 310 | $ | 323 | $ | 382 | (4 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
311 | 326 | 375 | (5 | ) | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
331 | 355 | 342 | (7 | ) | 4 | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(39 | ) | 48 | (3 | ) |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 292 | $ | 403 | $ | 339 | (28 | ) | 19 | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
106.5 | % | 108.8 | % | 91.1 | % | (2.3 | ) | 17.7 | |||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(12.6 | ) | 14.7 | (0.7 | ) | (27.3 | ) | 15.4 | ||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
93.9 | % | 123.5 | % | 90.4 | % | (29.6 | ) | 33.1 | |||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 331 | $ | 302 | $ | 335 | 106.5 | % | 92.4 | % | 89.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
355 | 331 | 108.8 | 88.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
342 | 91.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Specialty packages:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 149 | $ | 148 | $ | 145 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
149 | 147 | 144 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
91 | 84 | 87 | 8 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
22 | 21 | 23 | 5 | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
2 | 1 | (3 | ) | 100 |
nm
|
||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(4 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (300 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 111 | $ | 105 | $ | 106 | 6 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
61.1 | % | 56.9 | % | 60.8 | % | 4.2 | (3.9 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
14.5 | 14.2 | 15.6 | 0.3 | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
1.8 | 0.3 | (2.5 | ) | 1.5 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(2.6 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
74.8 | % | 70.6 | % | 73.5 | % | 4.2 | (2.9 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 113 | $ | 105 | $ | 106 | 75.6 | % | 71.1 | % | 73.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
105 | 106 | 71.1 | 73.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
110 | 76.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Surety and executive risk:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 93 | $ | 101 | $ | 107 | (8 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
95 | 104 | 107 | (9 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
64 | 76 | 71 | (16 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
3 | (3 | ) | 7 |
nm
|
nm
|
||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 67 | $ | 73 | $ | 78 | (8 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
66.5 | % | 73.2 | % | 66.1 | % | (6.7 | ) | 7.1 | |||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
3.4 | (2.7 | ) | 6.5 | 6.1 | (9.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
69.9 | % | 70.5 | % | 72.6 | % | (0.6 | ) | (2.1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 64 | $ | 90 | $ | 63 | 66.5 | % | 86.7 | % | 59.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
76 | 69 | 73.2 | 64.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
71 | 66.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Marketing primarily to nonprofit organizations, which accounted for approximately 72 percent of the policies and 40 percent of the premium volume for director and officer liability new business written in 2010.
|
|
|
·
|
Closely monitoring our for-profit policyholders – At year-end 2010, our in-force director and officer liability policies provided coverage to 13 non-financial publicly traded companies, including two Fortune 1000 companies. We also provided this coverage to approximately 500 banks, savings and loans and other financial institutions. The majority of these financial institution policyholders are smaller community banks, and we believe they have no unusual exposure to credit-market concerns, including subprime mortgages. Based on new policy data or information from the most recent policy renewal, only 15 of our bank and savings and loan policyholders have assets greater than $2 billion; only 23 have assets from $1 billion to $2 billion; and 54 have assets from
$500 million to $1 billion.
|
|
|
·
|
Writing on a claims-made basis, which normally restricts coverage to losses reported during the policy term.
|
|
|
·
|
Providing limits no higher than $10 million with facultative or treaty reinsurance in place in 2011 to cover losses greater than $6 million.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Machinery and equipment:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 35 | $ | 32 | $ | 30 | 9 | 7 | ||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
33 | 31 | 29 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
9 | 9 | 11 | 0 | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | 1 | 0 |
nm
|
|||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 7 | $ | 7 | $ | 12 | 0 | (42 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
28.2 | % | 26.9 | % | 36.1 | % | 1.3 | (9.2 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
0.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | (0.3 | ) | (0.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(6.0 | ) | (5.8 | ) | 5.5 | (0.2 | ) | (11.3 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(0.3 | ) | 0.2 | 0.0 | (0.5 | ) | 0.2 | |||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
21.9 | % | 21.6 | % | 42.5 | % | 0.3 | (20.9 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 9 | $ | 7 | $ | 10 | 28.2 | % | 23.3 | % | 33.2 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
9 | 10 | 27.2 | 35.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
11 | 37.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 721 | $ | 685 | $ | 689 | 5 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Fee revenues
|
2 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total premiums and fee revenues
|
723 | 686 | 690 | 5 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
508 | 485 | 498 | 5 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
63 | 106 | 99 | (41 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(29 | ) | (45 | ) | (51 | ) | 36 | 12 | ||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(5 | ) | 5 | 1 |
nm
|
400 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
537 | 551 | 547 | (3 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting expenses
|
240 | 215 | 224 | 12 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting loss
|
$ | (54 | ) | $ | (80 | ) | $ | (81 | ) | 33 | 1 | |||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
70.4 | % | 70.9 | % | 72.2 | % | (0.5 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
8.8 | 15.4 | 14.4 | (6.6 | ) | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(4.1 | ) | (6.6 | ) | (7.3 | ) | 2.5 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(0.7 | ) | 0.7 | 0.1 | (1.4 | ) | 0.6 | |||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
74.4 | 80.4 | 79.4 | (6.0 | ) | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting expenses
|
33.3 | 31.4 | 32.5 | 1.9 | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Combined ratio
|
107.7 | % | 111.8 | % | 111.9 | % | (4.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Combined ratio:
|
107.7 | % | 111.8 | % | 111.9 | % | (4.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Contribution from catastrophe losses and prior years reserve development
|
4.0 | 9.5 | 7.2 | (5.5 | ) | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||
|
Combined ratio before catastrophe losses and prior years reserve development
|
103.7 | % | 102.3 | % | 104.7 | % | 1.4 | (2.4 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Premiums – Earned premiums and net written premiums increased in 2010, due to higher renewal and new business premiums that reflected improved pricing, including rate changes effective late 2009 for most states and representing a net rate increase on average. During 2009, we adjusted pricing in an effort to return to consistent profitability in our personal lines segment. Net written premiums grew slightly, driven by new business growth that included expansion into new states where we previously offered only commercial lines policies. Industry average written premium growth was estimated at approximately 3 percent in 2010, up from negative 1 percent in both 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
·
|
Combined ratio – The combined ratio improved 4.1 percentage points in 2010, mostly due to lower weather-related catastrophe losses and partly due to improved pricing. The improvement was partially offset by a higher underwriting expense ratio and a lower benefit from net favorable reserve development on prior accident years. The 2010 level of catastrophe losses, with an 8.1 percent ratio, returned to near longer-term historical averages, just 0.4 percentage points below the 10-year average of 8.5 percent. The ratio for catastrophe losses in 2009, at 16.1 percent, was approximately twice the 10-year historical average but was only 1.6 percentage points higher than 2008. The current accident year loss and loss expense ratio, before catastrophe losses, improved slightly during 2010 and
reflected better underwriting and pricing. For 2009, it trended up slightly, once refinements made to the IBNR reserve allocation in 2008 were taken into account. The 2008 ratio included approximately $20 million, or 2.9 percentage points, from refinements made to the allocation of IBNR reserves by accident year.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009 | 2009-2008 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Agency renewal written premiums
|
$ | 685 | $ | 642 | $ | 672 | 7 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Agency new business written premiums
|
90 | 75 | 42 | 20 | 79 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other written premiums
|
(25 | ) | (26 | ) | (29 | ) | 4 | 10 | ||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
750 | 691 | 685 | 9 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Unearned premium change
|
(29 | ) | (6 | ) | 4 | (383 | ) |
nm
|
||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 721 | $ | 685 | $ | 689 | 5 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 571 | $ | 579 | $ | 562 | 79.2 | % | 84.5 | % | 81.5 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
591 | 575 | 86.3 | 83.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
597 | 86.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
New losses greater than $4,000,000
|
$ | 5 | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
New losses $1,000,000-$4,000,000
|
20 | 17 | 16 | 18 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
|
New losses $250,000-$1,000,000
|
41 | 48 | 44 | (15 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Case reserve development above $250,000
|
11 | 19 | 16 | (42 | ) | 25 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total large losses incurred
|
77 | 89 | 81 | (13 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other losses excluding catastrophe losses
|
336 | 281 | 295 | 20 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Catastrophe losses
|
58 | 111 | 100 | (48 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total losses incurred
|
$ | 471 | $ | 481 | $ | 476 | (2 | ) | 1 | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
New losses greater than $4,000,000
|
0.7 | % | 0.7 | % | 0.7 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
|
New losses $1,000,000-$4,000,000
|
2.8 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
New losses $250,000-$1,000,000
|
5.7 | 6.9 | 6.4 | (1.2 | ) | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
|
Case reserve development above $250,000
|
1.6 | 2.8 | 2.3 | (1.2 | ) | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total large losses incurred
|
10.8 | 12.9 | 11.7 | (2.1 | ) | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other losses excluding catastrophe losses
|
46.5 | 41.1 | 42.8 | 5.4 | (1.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Catastrophe losses
|
8.1 | 16.2 | 14.5 | (8.1 | ) | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total loss ratio
|
65.4 | % | 70.2 | % | 69.0 | % | (4.8 | ) | 1.2 | |||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commission expenses
|
$ | 145 | $ | 137 | $ | 137 | 6 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
95 | 78 | 87 | 22 | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Total underwriting expenses
|
$ | 240 | $ | 215 | $ | 224 | 12 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commission expenses
|
20.1 | % | 19.9 | % | 19.8 | % | 0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
13.2 | 11.5 | 12.7 | 1.7 | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Total underwriting expense ratio
|
33.3 | % | 31.4 | % | 32.5 | % | 1.9 | (1.1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Personal auto:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 352 | $ | 324 | $ | 320 | 9 | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
337 | 319 | 325 | 6 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
239 | 224 | 226 | 7 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(7 | ) | (6 | ) | (12 | ) | (17 | ) | 50 | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 235 | $ | 221 | $ | 218 | 6 | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
70.9 | % | 70.2 | % | 69.4 | % | 0.7 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(2.1 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 1.4 | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(0.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 0.0 | 0.1 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
69.8 | % | 69.0 | % | 67.2 | % | 0.8 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 242 | $ | 225 | $ | 225 | 72.0 | % | 70.4 | % | 69.2 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
227 | 227 | 71.2 | 69.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
230 | 70.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Homeowner:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 299 | $ | 275 | $ | 277 | 9 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
289 | 276 | 277 | 5 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
208 | 202 | 194 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
56 | 96 | 89 | (42 | ) | 8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(2 | ) | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | 60 | 44 | ||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(4 | ) | 5 | 1 |
nm
|
400 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 258 | $ | 298 | $ | 275 | (13 | ) | 8 | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
72.0 | % | 73.0 | % | 69.9 | % | (1.0 | ) | 3.1 | |||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
19.3 | 34.7 | 32.1 | (15.4 | ) | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(0.9 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (3.2 | ) | 0.7 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(1.4 | ) | 1.7 | 0.4 | (3.1 | ) | 1.3 | |||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
89.0 | % | 107.8 | % | 99.2 | % | (18.8 | ) | 8.6 | |||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 264 | $ | 295 | $ | 279 | 91.3 | % | 106.9 | % | 100.5 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
298 | 281 | 107.7 | 101.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
283 | 102.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Other personal:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$ | 99 | $ | 92 | $ | 88 | 8 | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
95 | 90 | 87 | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
61 | 60 | 79 | 2 | (24 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
4 | 7 | 6 | (43 | ) | 17 | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(20 | ) | (34 | ) | (30 | ) | 41 | (13 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 44 | $ | 33 | $ | 54 | 33 | (39 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
64.1 | % | 66.9 | % | 89.9 | % | (2.8 | ) | (23.0 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
3.8 | 7.7 | 6.9 | (3.9 | ) | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(20.8 | ) | (38.3 | ) | (34.4 | ) | 17.5 | (3.9 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
(0.5 | ) | 0.6 | (0.2 | ) | (1.1 | ) | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expense ratio
|
46.6 | % | 36.9 | % | 62.2 | % | 9.7 | (25.3 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 65 | $ | 59 | $ | 58 | 67.9 | % | 65.9 | % | 67.1 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
67 | 67 | 74.6 | 76.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
85 | 96.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 49 | $ | 27 | $ | 5 | 81 | 440 | ||||||||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
41 | 21 | 5 | 95 | 320 | |||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
1 | - | - |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | - | 0 |
nm
|
|||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
- | - | - |
nm
|
nm
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
41 | 20 | 5 | 105 | 300 | |||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting expenses
|
16 | 22 | 7 | (27 | ) | 214 | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting loss
|
$ | (8 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | 47 |
nm
|
|||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current accident year before catastrophe losses
|
83.8 | % | 75.4 | % | 109.1 | % | 8.4 | (33.7 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Current accident year catastrophe losses
|
1.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.0 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Prior accident years before catastrophe losses
|
(1.3 | ) | (0.9 | ) | 0.0 | (0.4 | ) | (0.9 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Prior accident years catastrophe losses
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total loss and loss expenses
|
83.7 | 74.7 | 109.5 | 9.0 | (34.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Underwriting expenses
|
31.7 | 80.2 | 156.5 | (48.5 | ) | (76.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Combined ratio
|
115.4 | % | 154.9 | % | 266.0 | % | (39.5 | ) | (111.1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Combined ratio:
|
115.4 | % | 154.9 | % | 266.0 | % | (39.5 | ) | (111.1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Contribution from catastrophe losses and prior years reserve development
|
(0.1 | ) | (0.7 | ) | 0.4 | 0.6 | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Combined ratio before catastrophe losses and prior years reserve development
|
115.5 | % | 155.6 | % | 265.6 | % | (40.1 | ) | (110.0 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Premiums – Higher earned premiums in 2010 reflected very strong net written premium growth during 2009, the second full year of operations for our excess and surplus lines segment. Net written premiums grew in 2010 primarily due to more initial opportunities to renew accounts that were written for the first time as new business during the previous year. The 2010 volume of those initial opportunities to renew nearly doubled the volume of 2009 because new business written premiums in 2009 approximately doubled new business premiums written in 2008. New business written premiums grew modestly in 2010, at a much slower rate than in 2009, partly due to increased competition in the excess and surplus lines market, including standard market companies writing policies for risks that were
formerly insurable only in the excess and surplus lines market.
|
|
|
·
|
Combined ratio – The combined ratio improved in 2010, primarily due to lower underwriting expenses. The total loss and loss expense ratio increased primarily due to higher large losses, claims exceeding $250,000 of insured loss, that outpaced growth in earned premiums.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Renewal written premiums
|
$ | 29 | $ | 10 | $ | - | 190 |
nm
|
||||||||||||
|
New business written premiums
|
35 | 32 | 14 | 9 | 129 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other written premiums
|
(6 | ) | (3 | ) | - | (100 | ) |
nm
|
||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
58 | 39 | 14 | 49 | 179 | |||||||||||||||
|
Unearned premium change
|
(9 | ) | (12 | ) | (9 | ) | 25 | (33 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 49 | $ | 27 | $ | 5 | 81 | 440 | ||||||||||||
|
Accident Year:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 42 | $ | 20 | $ | 4 | 85.0 | % | 73.5 | % | 102.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
20 | 5 | 75.6 | 104.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
as of December 31, 2008
|
5 | 109.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commission expenses
|
$ | 8 | $ | 5 | $ | 1 | 60 | 400 | ||||||||||||
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
8 | 17 | 6 | (53 | ) | 183 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total underwriting expenses
|
$ | 16 | $ | 22 | $ | 7 | (27 | ) | 214 | |||||||||||
|
Pt. Change
|
Pt. Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commission expenses
|
16.5 | % | 18.0 | % | 16.8 | % | (1.5 | ) | 1.2 | |||||||||||
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
15.2 | 62.2 | 139.7 | (47.0 | ) | (77.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Total underwriting expense ratio
|
31.7 | % | 80.2 | % | 156.5 | % | (48.5 | ) | (76.3 | ) | ||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 158 | $ | 143 | $ | 126 | 10 | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
Separate account investment management fees
|
1 | - | 2 |
nm
|
(100 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
159 | 143 | 128 | 11 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
|
Contract holders' benefits incurred
|
170 | 160 | 142 | 6 | 13 | |||||||||||||||
|
Investment interest credited to contract holders
|
(79 | ) | (69 | ) | (63 | ) | (14 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Operating expenses incurred
|
61 | 50 | 45 | 22 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total benefits and expenses
|
152 | 141 | 124 | 8 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
|
Life insurance segment profit
|
$ | 7 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | 250 | (50 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Revenues – Driven by higher term life insurance premiums, earned premiums have grown at a double-digit rate the past two years. Gross in-force policy face amounts increased to $74.124 billion at year-end 2010 from $69.815 billion at year-end 2009 and $65.888 billion at year-end 2008.
|
|
|
·
|
Profitability – The life insurance segment frequently reports only a small profit or loss because most of its investment income is included in investment segment results. We include only investment income credited to contract holders (interest assumed in life insurance policy reserve calculations) in life insurance segment results. The segment reported a $7 million profit in 2010.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Term life insurance
|
$ | 96 | $ | 86 | $ | 76 | 12 | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
Universal life insurance
|
35 | 28 | 24 | 25 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other life insurance, annuity, and disability income products
|
27 | 29 | 26 | (7 | ) | 12 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net earned premiums
|
$ | 158 | $ | 143 | $ | 126 | 10 | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Contract holders’ benefits incurred, related to traditional life and interest-sensitive products, accounted for 73.6 percent of 2010 total benefits and expenses compared with 76.4 percent in 2009 and 75.7 percent in 2008. Total contract holders’ benefits rose due to net death claims that increased but remained within our range of pricing expectations.
|
|
|
·
|
Operating expenses incurred, net of deferred acquisition costs, accounted for 26.4 percent of 2010 total benefits and expenses compared with 23.6 percent in 2009 and 24.3 percent in 2008. Unlocking of actuarial assumptions for our universal life contracts was the primary reason for increased operating expenses in 2010. Expenses in 2010 were also up from increased commissions due to growth in term life insurance and fixed annuities.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total investment income, net of expenses, pre-tax
|
$ | 518 | $ | 501 | $ | 537 | 3 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Investment interest credited to contract holders
|
(79 | ) | (69 | ) | (63 | ) | (14 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Realized investment gains and losses summary:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Realized investment gains and losses
|
185 | 440 | 686 | (58 | ) | (36 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Change in fair value of securities with embedded derivatives
|
10 | 27 | (38 | ) | (63 | ) |
nm
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other-than-temporary impairment charges
|
(36 | ) | (131 | ) | (510 | ) | 73 | 74 | ||||||||||||
|
Total realized investment gains and losses
|
159 | 336 | 138 | (53 | ) | 143 | ||||||||||||||
|
Investment operations profit
|
$ | 598 | $ | 768 | $ | 612 | (22 | ) | 25 | |||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Investment income – Pretax investment income increased 3 percent in 2010, primarily because of additional net purchases in our fixed-maturity portfolio that offset declining yields. Pretax investment income declined 7 percent in 2009, primarily because of prior year dividend cuts in our common stock portfolio. After-tax investment income increased 2 percent in 2010 compared with a decrease of 11 percent in 2009. The steeper decline in 2009 after-tax investment income, compared with the pretax basis, was primarily due to a change in mix of investment income as dividends have tax-advantages relative to interest on corporate bonds.
|
|
|
·
|
Realized investment gains and losses – We reported realized investment gains in all three years, largely due to investment sales that were discretionary in timing and amount. Those sales were somewhat offset by OTTI charges. The $510 million impairment for the write-down of 126 securities in 2008 largely offset gains from investment sales.
|
|
|
·
|
Interest income rose 5 percent in 2010 primarily due to investing our typical allocation of net cash flow from operations in fixed-maturity securities. It increased significantly in 2009 as we increased our allocation of investments to fixed-maturity securities.
|
|
|
·
|
Dividend income declined 1 percent in 2010 after declining 51 percent in 2009. In early 2009, we reduced the size of our preferred stock portfolio, which generally provides higher yields, in response to the market conditions related to the banking crisis. During 2008, we reduced the size of our common stock portfolio by more than 50 percent in response to actual or anticipated dividend reductions as well as for the implementation of a risk management program.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Investment income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest
|
$ | 423 | $ | 402 | $ | 326 | 5 | 23 | ||||||||||||
|
Dividends
|
99 | 100 | 204 | (1 | ) | (51 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Other
|
4 | 7 | 14 | (43 | ) | (50 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Investment expenses
|
(8 | ) | (8 | ) | (7 | ) | 0 | (14 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Total investment income, net of expenses, pre-tax
|
518 | 501 | 537 | 3 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Income taxes
|
(126 | ) | (118 | ) | (106 | ) | (7 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Total investment income, net of expenses, after-tax
|
$ | 392 | $ | 383 | $ | 431 | 2 | (11 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Effective tax rate
|
24.4 | % | 23.6 | % | 19.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
Average invested assets plus cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 11,547 | $ | 10,550 | $ | 11,193 | ||||||||||||||
|
Average yield pre-tax
|
4.5 | % | 4.7 | % | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
Average yield after-tax
|
3.4 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
$174 million in realized gains from equity sales, including $128 million from the sale of Verisk Analytics Inc. (NYSE: VRSK).
|
|
|
·
|
$13 million in net gains from fixed-maturity sales and calls.
|
|
|
·
|
$10 million in gains from changes in fair value of securities with embedded derivatives.
|
|
|
·
|
$36 million in OTTI charges to write down holdings of equities and fixed maturities.
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Taxable fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Impairment amount
|
$ | (1 | ) | $ | (61 | ) | $ | (162 | ) | |||
|
New book value
|
$ | 9 | $ | 81 | $ | 187 | ||||||
|
Percent to total book value owned
|
0 | % | 2 | % | 6 | % | ||||||
|
Number of securities impaired
|
5 | 37 | 86 | |||||||||
|
Percent to number of securities owned
|
0 | % | 3 | % | 10 | % | ||||||
|
Tax-exempt fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Impairment amount
|
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | |||
|
New book value
|
$ | 5 | $ | 3 | $ | 1 | ||||||
|
Percent to total book value owned
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
|
Number of securities impaired
|
4 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
|
Percent to number of securities owned
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
|
Common equities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Impairment amount
|
$ | (33 | ) | $ | (59 | ) | $ | (214 | ) | |||
|
New book value
|
$ | 120 | $ | 48 | $ | 87 | ||||||
|
Percent to total book value owned
|
5 | % | 2 | % | 5 | % | ||||||
|
Number of securities impaired
|
4 | 8 | 9 | |||||||||
|
Percent to number of securities owned
|
6 | % | 16 | % | 18 | % | ||||||
|
Preferred equities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Impairment amount
|
$ | 0 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (133 | ) | ||||
|
New book value
|
$ | 0 | $ | 5 | $ | 98 | ||||||
|
Percent to total book value owned
|
0 | % | 7 | % | 52 | % | ||||||
|
Number of securities impaired
|
2 | 3 | 30 | |||||||||
|
Percent to number of securities owned
|
8 | % | 12 | % | 86 | % | ||||||
|
Total:
|
||||||||||||
|
Impairment amount
|
$ | (36 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | $ | (510 | ) | |||
|
New book value
|
$ | 134 | $ | 137 | $ | 373 | ||||||
|
Percent to total book value owned
|
1 | % | 1 | % | 5 | % | ||||||
|
Number of securities impaired
|
15 | 50 | 126 | |||||||||
|
Percent to number of securities owned
|
1 | % | 2 | % | 6 | % | ||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Financial
|
$ | 0 | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (72 | ) | ||||
|
Services cyclical
|
0 | (14 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||
|
Real estate
|
(1 | ) | (11 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||||
|
Consumer cyclical
|
0 | (5 | ) | (14 | ) | |||||||
|
Other
|
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
(3 | ) | (62 | ) | (163 | ) | ||||||
|
Common equities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Industrials
|
0 | (35 | ) | 0 | ||||||||
|
Consumer discretionary
|
0 | (10 | ) | 0 | ||||||||
|
Material
|
0 | (8 | ) | 0 | ||||||||
|
Health
|
(21 | ) | (6 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||
|
Financial
|
0 | 0 | (184 | ) | ||||||||
|
Information technology
|
(12 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
|
Total common equities
|
(33 | ) | (59 | ) | (214 | ) | ||||||
|
Preferred equities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Financial
|
0 | (10 | ) | (132 | ) | |||||||
|
Other
|
0 | 0 | (1 | ) | ||||||||
|
Total preferred equities
|
0 | (10 | ) | (133 | ) | |||||||
|
Total
|
$ | (36 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | $ | (510 | ) | |||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
2010-2009
|
2009-2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change %
|
Change %
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Interest and fees on loans and leases
|
$ | 7 | $ | 7 | $ | 8 | 0 | (13 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Money management fees
|
- | - | 2 |
nm
|
(100 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Other revenues
|
1 | 2 | (2 | ) | (50 | ) |
nm
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
8 | 9 | 8 | (11 | ) | 13 | ||||||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
54 | 55 | 53 | (2 | ) | 4 | ||||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses
|
11 | 14 | 15 | (21 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Total expenses
|
65 | 69 | 68 | (6 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other loss
|
$ | (57 | ) | $ | (60 | ) | $ | (60 | ) | 5 | 0 | |||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Sources of liquidity:
|
||||||||||||
|
Insurance subsidiary dividends received
|
$ | 270 | $ | 0 | $ | 220 | ||||||
|
Other operating subsidiaries' dividends received
|
0 | 0 | 10 | |||||||||
|
Investment income received
|
41 | 41 | 81 | |||||||||
|
Uses of liquidity:
|
||||||||||||
|
Debt interest payments
|
$ | 52 | $ | 52 | $ | 53 | ||||||
|
Pension payments
|
25 | 34 | 34 | |||||||||
|
Shareholders dividend payments
|
252 | 249 | 250 | |||||||||
|
Purchase (issuance) of treasury shares
|
10 | (1 | ) | 138 | ||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Premiums collected
|
$ | 2,971 | $ | 2,957 | $ | 3,060 | ||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses paid
|
(1,858 | ) | (1,910 | ) | (1,947 | ) | ||||||
|
Commissions and other underwriting expenses paid
|
(954 | ) | (951 | ) | (988 | ) | ||||||
|
Insurance subsidiary cash flow from underwriting
|
159 | 96 | 125 | |||||||||
|
Investment income received less investment expense paid
|
350 | 317 | 360 | |||||||||
|
Insurance operating cash flow
|
$ | 509 | $ | 413 | $ | 485 | ||||||
|
|
·
|
$391 million aggregate principal amount of 6.92% senior debentures due 2028.
|
|
|
·
|
$28 million aggregate principal amount of 6.9% senior debentures due 2028.
|
|
|
·
|
$374 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior debentures due 2034.
|
|
|
·
|
Dividends to shareholders –The ability of the company to continue paying cash dividends is subject to factors the board of directors may deem relevant. While the board and management believe there is merit to sustaining the company’s record of dividend increases, our first priority is the company’s financial strength. Over the past 10 years, the company has paid an average of 46.9 percent of net income as dividends. Through 2010, the board had increased our cash dividend for 50 consecutive years. The board decision in August 2010 to increase the dividend demonstrated confidence in the company’s strong capital, liquidity, financial flexibility and initiatives to improve earnings performance.
|
|
|
·
|
Common stock repurchase – Generally, our board believes that share repurchases can help fulfill our commitment to enhancing shareholder value. Consequently, the board has authorized the repurchase of outstanding shares, giving management discretion to purchase shares at reasonable prices in light of circumstances at the time of purchase, pursuant to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Year
|
Years
|
Years
|
There-
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Payment due by period
|
2011
|
2012-2013 | 2014-2015 |
after
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Gross property casualty loss and loss expense payments
|
$ | 1,306 | $ | 1,325 | $ | 583 | $ | 923 | $ | 4,137 | ||||||||||
|
Gross life policyholder obligations
|
108 | 160 | 212 | 3,368 | 3,848 | |||||||||||||||
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
52 | 104 | 104 | 786 | 1,046 | |||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 793 | 793 | |||||||||||||||
|
Short-term debt
|
49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | |||||||||||||||
|
Profit-sharing commissions
|
77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77 | |||||||||||||||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
11 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 19 | |||||||||||||||
|
Computer hardware and software
|
21 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 50 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other invested assets
|
4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,628 | $ | 1,625 | $ | 905 | $ | 5,870 | $ | 10,028 | ||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Interest on long- and short-term debt – We expect total interest expense to be approximately $52 million in 2011. We discuss outstanding debt in Additional Sources of Liquidity,
Page 79
.
|
|
|
·
|
Property casualty profit-sharing commissions – Profit-sharing, or contingent, commissions are paid to agencies using a formula that takes into account agency profitability and other factors. We estimate 2011 contingent commission payments of approximately $77 million. We discuss commission expense trends in Commercial Lines and Personal Lines Insurance Results of Operations,
Page 54 and Page 64, respectively
.
|
|
|
·
|
Computer hardware and software – We expect to spend $45 million over the next three years for current material commitments for computer hardware and software, including maintenance contracts on hardware and other known obligations. We discuss below the non-contractual expenses we anticipate for computer hardware and software in 2011.
|
|
|
·
|
Qualified pension plan – In 2011, we made a voluntary cash contribution of $35 million to our qualified pension plan. We currently estimate a $13 million net pension expense and a $8 million expense for company 401(k) contributions. Going forward, we anticipate a lower cash pension contribution.
|
|
|
·
|
Commissions – We expect commission payments to generally track with written premiums.
|
|
|
·
|
Other operating expenses – Many of our operating expenses are not contractual obligations but reflect the ongoing expenses of our business. In addition to contractual obligations for hardware and software discussed above, we anticipate capitalizing approximately $8 million in spending for key technology initiatives in 2011. Capitalized development costs related to key technology initiatives totaled $7 million in 2010, $28 million in 2009 and $38 million in 2008. These activities are conducted at our discretion, and we have no material contractual obligations for activities planned as part of these projects.
|
|
|
·
|
Section A shows our total property casualty loss and loss expense reserves recorded at the balance sheet date for each of the indicated calendar years on a gross and net basis. Those reserves represent the estimated amount of unpaid loss and loss expenses for claims arising in the indicated calendar year and all prior accident years at the balance sheet date, including losses that were incurred but not yet reported to the company.
|
|
|
·
|
Section B shows the cumulative net amount paid with respect to the previously recorded reserve as of the end of each succeeding year. For example, as of December 31, 2010, we had paid $1.797 billion of loss and loss expenses in calendar years 2001 through 2010 for losses that occurred in accident years 2000 and prior. An estimated $237 million of losses remained unpaid as of year-end 2010 (net re-estimated reserves of $2.034 billion from Section C less cumulative net paid loss and loss expenses of $1.797 billion).
|
|
|
·
|
Section C shows the re-estimated amount of the previously reported reserves based on experience as of the end of each succeeding year. The estimate is increased or decreased as we learn more about the development of the related claims.
|
|
|
·
|
Section D, cumulative net reserve development, represents the aggregate change in the estimates for all years subsequent to the year the reserves were initially established. For example, reserves established at December 31, 2000, had developed favorably by $148 million over 10 years, net of reinsurance, which was reflected in income over the 10 years. The table shows favorable reserve development as a negative number. Favorable reserve development on prior accident years, which represents a negative expense, is favorable to income. The “One year later” line in the table shows the effects on income before income taxes in 2010, 2009 and 2008 of changes in estimates of the reserves for loss and loss expenses for all accident years. The effect was favorable to pretax income for
those three years by $304 million, $188 million, and $323 million, respectively. Our annual review has led us to add to income in each of the past 22 years due to favorable development of reserves on prior accident years.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Calendar year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A. Originally reported reserves for unpaid loss and loss expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross of reinsurance
|
$ | 2,401 | $ | 2,865 | $ | 3,150 | $ | 3,386 | $ | 3,514 | $ | 3,629 | $ | 3,860 | $ | 3,925 | $ | 4,040 | $ | 4,096 | $ | 4,137 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reinsurance recoverable
|
219 | 513 | 542 | 541 | 537 | 518 | 504 | 528 | 542 | 435 | 326 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net of reinsurance
|
$ | 2,182 | $ | 2,352 | $ | 2,608 | $ | 2,845 | $ | 2,977 | $ | 3,111 | $ | 3,356 | $ | 3,397 | $ | 3,498 | $ | 3,661 | $ | 3,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
B. Cumulative net paid as of:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One year later
|
$ | 697 | $ | 758 | $ | 799 | $ | 817 | $ | 907 | $ | 944 | $ | 1,006 | $ | 979 | $ | 994 | $ | 926 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Two years later
|
1,116 | 1,194 | 1,235 | 1,293 | 1,426 | 1,502 | 1,547 | 1,523 | 1,529 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Three years later
|
1,378 | 1,455 | 1,519 | 1,626 | 1,758 | 1,845 | 1,896 | 1,857 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Four years later
|
1,526 | 1,614 | 1,716 | 1,823 | 1,963 | 2,059 | 2,096 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Five years later
|
1,623 | 1,717 | 1,823 | 1,945 | 2,096 | 2,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Six years later
|
1,680 | 1,778 | 1,889 | 2,031 | 2,163 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Seven years later
|
1,717 | 1,819 | 1,940 | 2,077 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eight years later
|
1,750 | 1,855 | 1,973 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nine years later
|
1,778 | 1,879 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ten years later
|
1,797 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
C. Net reserves re-estimated as of:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One year later
|
$ | 2,120 | $ | 2,307 | $ | 2,528 | $ | 2,649 | $ | 2,817 | $ | 2,995 | $ | 3,112 | $ | 3,074 | $ | 3,310 | $ | 3,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Two years later
|
2,083 | 2,263 | 2,377 | 2,546 | 2,743 | 2,871 | 2,893 | 3,042 | 3,197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Three years later
|
2,052 | 2,178 | 2,336 | 2,489 | 2,657 | 2,724 | 2,898 | 3,005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Four years later
|
2,010 | 2,153 | 2,299 | 2,452 | 2,578 | 2,776 | 2,907 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Five years later
|
1,999 | 2,127 | 2,276 | 2,414 | 2,645 | 2,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Six years later
|
1,992 | 2,122 | 2,259 | 2,469 | 2,662 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Seven years later
|
1,994 | 2,111 | 2,298 | 2,491 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eight years later
|
1,986 | 2,147 | 2,318 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nine years later
|
2,018 | 2,165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ten years later
|
2,034 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
D. Cumulative net redundancy as of:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One year later
|
$ | (62 | ) | $ | (45 | ) | $ | (80 | ) | $ | (196 | ) | $ | (160 | ) | $ | (116 | ) | $ | (244 | ) | $ | (323 | ) | $ | (188 | ) | $ | (304 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Two years later
|
(99 | ) | (89 | ) | (231 | ) | (299 | ) | (234 | ) | (240 | ) | (463 | ) | (355 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Three years later
|
(130 | ) | (174 | ) | (272 | ) | (356 | ) | (320 | ) | (387 | ) | (458 | ) | (392 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Four years later
|
(172 | ) | (199 | ) | (309 | ) | (393 | ) | (399 | ) | (335 | ) | (449 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Five years later
|
(183 | ) | (225 | ) | (332 | ) | (431 | ) | (332 | ) | (323 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Six years later
|
(190 | ) | (230 | ) | (349 | ) | (376 | ) | (315 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Seven years later
|
(188 | ) | (241 | ) | (310 | ) | (354 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eight years later
|
(196 | ) | (205 | ) | (290 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nine years later
|
(164 | ) | (187 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ten years later
|
(148 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net reserves re-estimated—latest
|
$ | 2,034 | $ | 2,165 | $ | 2,318 | $ | 2,491 | $ | 2,662 | $ | 2,788 | $ | 2,907 | $ | 3,005 | $ | 3,197 | $ | 3,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re-estimated recoverable—latest
|
250 | 482 | 514 | 495 | 514 | 478 | 471 | 457 | 489 | 393 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross liability re-estimated—latest
|
$ | 2,284 | $ | 2,647 | $ | 2,832 | $ | 2,986 | $ | 3,176 | $ | 3,266 | $ | 3,378 | $ | 3,462 | $ | 3,686 | $ | 3,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative gross redundancy
|
$ | (117 | ) | $ | (218 | ) | $ | (318 | ) | $ | (400 | ) | $ | (338 | ) | $ | (363 | ) | $ | (482 | ) | $ | (463 | ) | $ | (354 | ) | $ | (346 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Loss reserves
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Case
|
IBNR
|
expense
|
gross
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||
|
reserves
|
reserves
|
reserves
|
reserves
|
of total
|
||||||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial casualty
|
$ | 966 | $ | 321 | $ | 533 | $ | 1,820 | 48.8 | % | ||||||||||
|
Commercial property
|
130 | 13 | 32 | 175 | 4.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Commercial auto
|
258 | 41 | 60 | 359 | 9.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Workers' compensation
|
476 | 465 | 147 | 1,088 | 29.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Specialty packages
|
80 | 2 | 10 | 92 | 2.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Surety and executive risk
|
130 | 2 | 57 | 189 | 5.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,041 | $ | 847 | $ | 840 | $ | 3,728 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial casualty
|
$ | 1,044 | $ | 309 | $ | 540 | $ | 1,893 | 50.8 | % | ||||||||||
|
Commercial property
|
84 | 15 | 31 | 130 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Commercial auto
|
266 | 47 | 65 | 378 | 10.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Workers' compensation
|
452 | 458 | 143 | 1,053 | 28.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
Specialty packages
|
68 | 5 | 10 | 83 | 2.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Surety and executive risk
|
128 | (2 | ) | 55 | 181 | 4.9 | ||||||||||||||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,044 | $ | 835 | $ | 845 | $ | 3,724 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Workers'
|
Specialty
|
Surety &
|
Machinery &
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
casualty
|
property
|
auto
|
compensation
|
packages
|
exec risk
|
equipment
|
Totals
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009 accident year
|
$ | (105 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (54 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 14 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (176 | ) | ||||||||||
|
2008 accident year
|
(51 | ) | 0 | (9 | ) | 5 | 0 | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | (62 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2007 accident year
|
(33 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | (43 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
2006 accident year
|
(5 | ) | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | (3 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2005 accident year
|
0 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2004 accident year
|
(4 | ) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2003 and prior accident years
|
12 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (186 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 3 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (269 | ) | |||||||||
|
Reserves estimated as of December 31, 2009
|
$ | 1,605 | $ | 115 | $ | 374 | $ | 975 | $ | 81 | $ | 153 | $ | 5 | $ | 3,308 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Reserves re-estimated as of December 31, 2010
|
1,419 | 105 | 341 | 936 | 79 | 156 | 3 | 3,039 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (186 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 3 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (269 | ) | |||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008 accident year
|
$ | (89 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (134 | ) | |||||||||
|
2007 accident year
|
(36 | ) | 0 | (5 | ) | 5 | 2 | 9 | (1 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
2006 accident year
|
(33 | ) | 4 | (4 | ) | 2 | 0 | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (35 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2005 accident year
|
(17 | ) | (1 | ) | 1 | 6 | 2 | (5 | ) | 0 | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
2004 accident year
|
3 | (2 | ) | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2003 accident year
|
9 | (1 | ) | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2002 and prior accident years
|
9 | (1 | ) | 0 | 34 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | 0 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (154 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | (20 | ) | $ | 48 | $ | 0 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (147 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Reserves estimated as of December 31, 2008
|
$ | 1,559 | $ | 136 | $ | 385 | $ | 842 | $ | 82 | $ | 130 | $ | 7 | $ | 3,141 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Reserves re-estimated as of December 31, 2009
|
1,405 | 120 | 365 | 890 | 82 | 127 | 5 | 2,994 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (154 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | (20 | ) | $ | 48 | $ | 0 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (147 | ) | ||||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007 accident year
|
$ | (93 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | 14 | $ | 0 | $ | (106 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
2006 accident year
|
(55 | ) | (7 | ) | 5 | 0 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | 1 | (59 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2005 accident year
|
(48 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | 5 | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 0 | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2004 accident year
|
(27 | ) | 1 | (4 | ) | 4 | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | 0 | (31 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2003 accident year
|
(19 | ) | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | (1 | ) | 0 | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2002 accident year
|
(4 | ) | 0 | (2 | ) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2001 and prior accident years
|
(11 | ) | (2 | ) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (257 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 7 | $ | 1 | $ | (273 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Reserves estimated as of December 31, 2007
|
$ | 1,565 | $ | 121 | $ | 383 | $ | 777 | $ | 76 | $ | 94 | $ | 8 | $ | 3,024 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Reserves re-estimated as of December 31, 2008
|
1,308 | 111 | 375 | 775 | 72 | 101 | 9 | 2,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (257 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 7 | $ | 1 | $ | (273 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Moderation in commercial casualty trend selections
– We saw moderating loss cost trends continue in several commercial casualty coverages, most notably for umbrella coverage. A number of factors seem to have played a role, including a slow economic recovery, favorable court decisions, policy form restrictions, and claims department initiatives. Accordingly, it is not entirely clear whether these moderating loss cost trends will persist, and our actuaries have responded cautiously to these changes, electing to recognize improvements in trends used for estimating reserves in a progressive, incremental fashion.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial casualty loss emergence
– As in 2009, commercial multiple peril liability coverages contributed to favorable reserve development because both paid loss and reported loss emergence deviated favorably from projections. Actual paid losses in calendar year 2010 fell short of the amount projected at year-end 2009 by more than $20 million. Reported losses for accident years 2007 through 2009 also developed more favorably than expected, while reported loss development related to other accident years aligned more closely with expectations.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial auto loss emergence
– Similar to commercial casualty, commercial auto liability contributed to favorable development because both paid and reported loss emergence during calendar year 2010 was substantially less than expected. As of December 31, 2009 we expected reported loss emergence in the next 12 calendar months to be approximately $26 million; actual emergence was $17 million. Paid loss emergence was approximately 15 percent lower than expected at the prior year-end.
|
|
|
·
|
Workers’ compensation trends and initiatives
– Favorable calendar year development was $39 million. Accident year 2009 contributed $54 million in favorable development while accident years 2003 and prior developed adversely by $11 million. Higher than anticipated trend continues to plague the older accident years causing us to raise our paid loss trend estimate for the second year in a row. However, projections of ultimate loss for accident years 2004-2008 held steady. The improvement in accident year 2009 is likely an early manifestation of several claims initiatives begun in the first part of 2010, as discussed in
Commercial Lines Insurance Results of Operations, Commercial Lines of Business Analysis,
Page 58
.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Loss reserves
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Case
|
IBNR
|
expense
|
gross
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||
|
reserves
|
reserves
|
reserves
|
reserves
|
of total
|
||||||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Personal auto
|
$ | 126 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | 153 | 43.4 | % | |||||||||
|
Homeowner
|
73 | 21 | 17 | 111 | 31.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other personal
|
37 | 43 | 9 | 89 | 25.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 236 | $ | 63 | $ | 54 | $ | 353 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Personal auto
|
$ | 130 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | 154 | 44.2 | % | |||||||||
|
Homeowner
|
56 | 26 | 17 | 99 | 28.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other personal
|
45 | 42 | 9 | 96 | 27.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 231 | $ | 64 | $ | 54 | $ | 349 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Personal
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||
|
auto
|
Homeowner
|
personal
|
Totals
|
|||||||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2009 accident year
|
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | ||||
|
2008 accident year
|
(2 | ) | (3 | ) | (8 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||
|
2007 accident year
|
1 | 0 | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
|
2006 accident year
|
(1 | ) | 0 | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||
|
2005 accident year
|
(1 | ) | 0 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||
|
2004 accident year
|
(1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||
|
2003 and prior accident years
|
(1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (7 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | ||||
|
Reserves estimated as of December 31, 2009
|
$ | 154 | $ | 89 | $ | 89 | $ | 332 | ||||||||
|
Reserves re-estimated as of December 31, 2010
|
147 | 83 | 68 | 298 | ||||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (7 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | ||||
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2008 accident year
|
$ | (3 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (17 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | ||||
|
2007 accident year
|
(3 | ) | 3 | (12 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||||
|
2006 accident year
|
(1 | ) | 0 | (10 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||
|
2005 accident year
|
1 | 0 | (1 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||
|
2004 accident year
|
0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
2003 accident year
|
0 | (1 | ) | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||
|
2002 and prior accident years
|
0 | 0 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (6 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | |||||
|
Reserves estimated as of December 31, 2008
|
$ | 165 | $ | 82 | $ | 106 | $ | 353 | ||||||||
|
Reserves re-estimated as of December 31, 2009
|
159 | 82 | 72 | 313 | ||||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (6 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | |||||
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2007 accident year
|
$ | 11 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 2 | ||||||
|
2006 accident year
|
(4 | ) | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||
|
2005 accident year
|
(9 | ) | (1 | ) | (8 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||
|
2004 accident year
|
(5 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||
|
2003 accident year
|
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||
|
2002 accident year
|
(1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||
|
2001 and prior accident years
|
(1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (12 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | ||||
|
Reserves estimated as of December 31, 2007
|
$ | 189 | $ | 77 | $ | 107 | $ | 373 | ||||||||
|
Reserves re-estimated as of December 31, 2008
|
177 | 69 | 77 | 323 | ||||||||||||
|
Deficiency/(redundancy)
|
$ | (12 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | ||||
|
(In millions)
|
Loss reserves
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Case
|
IBNR
|
expense
|
Gross
|
|||||||||||||
|
reserves
|
reserves
|
reserves
|
Reserves
|
|||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines
|
$ | 29 | $ | 10 | $ | 17 | $ | 56 | ||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines
|
$ | 10 | $ | 5 | $ | 7 | $ | 22 | ||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
RMS
|
AIR
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Percent
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross
|
Net
|
of total
|
Gross
|
Net
|
of total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Probability
|
Losses
|
Losses
|
equity
|
Losses
|
Losses
|
equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2.0% of a 1 in 50 year event
|
$ | 369 | $ | 53 | 1.0 | % | $ | 329 | $ | 51 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||
|
1.0% of a 1 in 100 year event
|
548 | 89 | 1.8 | 514 | 67 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
0.4% of a 1 in 250 year event
|
882 | 306 | 6.1 | 842 | 280 | 5.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
0.2% of a 1 in 500 year event
|
1,195 | 509 | 10.1 | 1,031 | 402 | 8.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Property per risk treaty – The primary purpose of the property treaty is to provide capacity up to $25 million, adequate for the majority of the risks we write. It also includes protection for extra-contractual liability coverage losses. We retain the first $6 million of each loss. Losses between $6 million and $25 million are reinsured at 100 percent. The ceded premium is estimated at $32 million for 2011, compared with $36 million in 2010 and $35 million in 2009. The lower ceded premium for 2011 compared with 2010 is largely due to raising our loss retention of each loss from $5 million to $6 million.
|
|
|
·
|
Casualty per occurrence treaty – The casualty treaty provides capacity up to $25 million. Similar to the property treaty, it provides sufficient capacity to cover the vast majority of casualty accounts we insure and also includes protection for extra-contractual liability coverage losses. We retain the first $6 million of each loss. Losses between $6 million and $25 million are reinsured at 100 percent. The ceded
|
|
|
·
|
Casualty excess treaties – We purchase a casualty reinsurance treaty that provides an additional $25 million in protection for certain casualty losses. This treaty, along with the casualty per occurrence treaty, provides a total of $50 million of protection for workers’ compensation, extra-contractual liability coverage and clash coverage losses, which would apply when a single occurrence involves multiple policyholders of The Cincinnati Insurance Companies or multiple coverages for one insured. The ceded premium is estimated at approximately $2 million in 2011, similar to the premium we paid in 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
·
|
Property catastrophe treaty – To protect against catastrophic events such as wind and hail, hurricanes or earthquakes, we purchase property catastrophe reinsurance with a limit up to $500 million. For the 2011 treaty, ceded premiums are estimated at $49 million, similar to the $49 million in 2010 and $50 million in 2009. We retain the first $45 million of any loss and varying shares of losses up to $500 million:
|
|
|
o
|
38.5 percent of losses between $45 million and $70 million
|
|
|
o
|
17.6 percent of losses between $70 million and $105 million
|
|
|
o
|
5.0 percent of losses between $105 million and $200 million
|
|
|
o
|
11.3 percent of losses between $200 million and $300 million
|
|
|
o
|
6.5 percent of losses between $300 million and $400 million
|
|
|
o
|
5.0 percent of losses between $400 million and $500 million
|
|
|
·
|
Property per risk treaty – The property treaty provides limits up to $5 million, which is adequate capacity for the risk profile we insure. It also includes protection for extra-contractual liability coverage losses. The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company retains the first $1 million of any policy loss. Losses between $1 million and $5 million are reinsured at 100 percent by The Cincinnati Insurance Company.
|
|
|
·
|
Casualty treaties – The casualty treaty is written on an excess of loss basis and provide limits up to $6 million, which is adequate capacity for the risk profile we insure. A second treaty layer of $5 million excess of $6 million is written to provide coverage for extra contractual obligations or clash exposures. The maximum retention for any one casualty loss is $1 million by The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company. Losses between $1 million and $11 million are reinsured at 100 percent by The Cincinnati Insurance Company.
|
|
|
·
|
Basket retention – The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company has purchased this coverage to limit our retention to $1 million in the event that the same occurrence results in both a property and a casualty loss.
|
|
|
·
|
Property catastrophe treaty – As a subsidiary of The Cincinnati Insurance Company, The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company has been added as a named insured under our corporate property catastrophe treaty. All terms and conditions of this treaty apply to policies underwritten by The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company.
|
|
|
·
|
Unusually high levels of catastrophe losses due to risk concentrations, changes in weather patterns, environmental events, terrorism incidents or other causes
|
|
|
·
|
Increased frequency and/or severity of claims
|
|
|
·
|
Inadequate estimates or assumptions used for critical accounting estimates
|
|
|
·
|
Recession or other economic conditions resulting in lower demand for insurance products or increased payment delinquencies
|
|
|
·
|
Delays in adoption and implementation of underwriting and pricing methods that could increase our pricing accuracy, underwriting profit and competitiveness
|
|
|
·
|
Inability to defer policy acquisition costs for any business segment if pricing and loss trends would lead management to conclude that segment could not achieve sustainable profitability
|
|
|
·
|
Declines in overall stock market values negatively affecting the company’s equity portfolio and book value
|
|
|
·
|
Events, such as the credit crisis, followed by prolonged periods of economic instability or recession, that lead to:
|
|
|
o
|
Significant or prolonged decline in the value of a particular security or group of securities and impairment of the asset(s)
|
|
|
o
|
Significant decline in investment income due to reduced or eliminated dividend payouts from a particular security or group of securities
|
|
|
o
|
Significant rise in losses from surety and director and officer policies written for financial institutions
|
|
|
·
|
Prolonged low interest rate environment or other factors that limit the company’s ability to generate growth in investment income or interest rate fluctuations that result in declining values of fixed-maturity investments, including declines in accounts in which we hold bank-owned life insurance contract assets
|
|
|
·
|
Increased competition that could result in a significant reduction in the company’s premium volume
|
|
|
·
|
Changing consumer insurance-buying habits and consolidation of independent insurance agencies that could alter our competitive advantages
|
|
|
·
|
Inability to obtain adequate reinsurance on acceptable terms, amount of reinsurance purchased, financial strength of reinsurers and the potential for non-payment or delay in payment by reinsurers
|
|
|
·
|
Events or conditions that could weaken or harm the company’s relationships with its independent agencies and hamper opportunities to add new agencies, resulting in limitations on the company’s opportunities for growth, such as:
|
|
|
o
|
Downgrades of the company’s financial strength ratings
|
|
|
o
|
Concerns that doing business with the company is too difficult
|
|
|
o
|
Perceptions that the company’s level of service, particularly claims service, is no longer a distinguishing characteristic in the marketplace
|
|
|
o
|
Delays or inadequacies in the development, implementation, performance and benefits of technology projects and enhancements
|
|
|
·
|
Actions of insurance departments, state attorneys general or other regulatory agencies, including a change to a federal system of regulation from a state-based system, that:
|
|
|
o
|
Restrict our ability to exit or reduce writings of unprofitable coverages or lines of business
|
|
|
o
|
Place the insurance industry under greater regulatory scrutiny or result in new statutes, rules and regulations
|
|
|
o
|
Add assessments for guaranty funds, other insurance-related assessments or mandatory reinsurance arrangements; or that impair our ability to recover such assessments through future surcharges or other rate changes
|
|
|
o
|
Increase our provision for federal income taxes due to changes in tax law
|
|
|
o
|
Increase our other expenses
|
|
|
o
|
Limit our ability to set fair, adequate and reasonable rates
|
|
|
o
|
Place us at a disadvantage in the marketplace
|
|
|
o
|
Restrict our ability to execute our business model, including the way we compensate agents
|
|
|
·
|
Adverse outcomes from litigation or administrative proceedings
|
|
|
·
|
Events or actions, including unauthorized intentional circumvention of controls, that reduce the company’s future ability to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
·
|
Unforeseen departure of certain executive officers or other key employees due to retirement, health or other causes that could interrupt progress toward important strategic goals or diminish the effectiveness of certain longstanding relationships with insurance agents and others
|
|
|
·
|
Events, such as an epidemic, natural catastrophe or terrorism, that could hamper our ability to assemble our workforce at our headquarters location
|
|
|
·
|
Difficulties with technology or data security breaches that could negatively affect our ability to conduct business and our relationships with agents, policyholders and others
|
|
|
·
|
Political – the potential for a decrease in value due to the real or perceived impact of governmental policies or conditions
|
|
|
·
|
Regulatory – the potential for a decrease in value due to the impact of legislative proposals or changes in laws or regulations
|
|
|
·
|
Economic – the potential for a decrease in value due to changes in general economic factors (recession, inflation, deflation, etc.)
|
|
|
·
|
Revaluation – the potential for a decrease in value due to a change in relative value (change in market multiple) of the market brought on by general economic factors
|
|
|
·
|
Interest-rate – the potential for a decrease in value of a security or portfolio due to its sensitivity to changes (increases or decreases) in the general level of interest rates
|
|
|
·
|
Company-specific risk – the potential for a particular issuer to experience a decline in value due to the impact of sector or market risk on the holding or because of issues specific to the firm
|
|
|
·
|
Fraud – the potential for a negative impact on an issuer’s performance due to actual or alleged illegal or improper activity of individuals it employs
|
|
|
·
|
Credit – the potential for deterioration in an issuer’s financial profile due to specific company issues, problems it faces in the course of its operations or industry-related issues
|
|
|
·
|
Default – the possibility that an issuer will not make a required payment (interest payment or return of principal) on its debt. Generally this occurs after its financial profile has deteriorated (credit risk) and it no longer has the means to make its payments
|
|
Taxable
fixed maturities
|
Tax-exempt
fixed maturities
|
Common
equities
|
Preferred
equities
|
Short-term
investments
|
||||||
|
Political
|
A
|
H
|
A
|
A
|
L
|
|||||
|
Regulatory
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
L
|
|||||
|
Economic
|
A
|
A
|
H
|
A
|
L
|
|||||
|
Revaluation
|
A
|
A
|
H
|
A
|
L
|
|||||
|
Interest rate
|
H
|
H
|
A
|
H
|
L
|
|||||
|
Fraud
|
A
|
L
|
A
|
A
|
L
|
|||||
|
Credit
|
A
|
L
|
A
|
A
|
L
|
|||||
|
Default
|
|
A
|
|
L
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
L
|
|
(In millions)
|
Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
-200
|
-100
|
0
|
100
|
200
|
||||||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2010
|
$ | 9,260 | $ | 8,814 | $ | 8,383 | $ | 7,964 | $ | 7,568 | ||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
$ | 8,705 | $ | 8,279 | $ | 7,855 | $ | 7,428 | $ | 7,024 | ||||||||||
|
|
·
|
312 of these holdings were trading between 90 percent and 100 percent of book value. The value of these securities fluctuates primarily because of changes in interest rates. The fair value of these 312 securities was $1.124 billion at year-end 2010, and they accounted for $26 million in unrealized losses.
|
|
|
·
|
4 of these holdings were trading between 70 percent and 90 percent of book value. The fair value of these holdings was $101 million, and they accounted for $23 million in unrealized losses. These securities, which are being closely monitored, have been affected by a combination of factors including wider credit spreads driven primarily by the distress in the mortgage market, slumping real estate valuations, the effects of a slowing economy and the effects of higher interest rates on longer duration instruments. The majority of these securities are in the financial-related sectors.
|
|
|
·
|
No securities were trading below 70 percent of book value at year-end 2010.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Less than 12 months
|
12 months or more
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
$ | 325 | $ | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 1 | $ | 334 | $ | 10 | ||||||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
133 | 1 | - | - | 133 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate securities
|
354 | 6 | 39 | 3 | 393 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
812 | 16 | 48 | 4 | 860 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common equities
|
337 | 28 | - | - | 337 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred equities
|
5 | - | 23 | 1 | 28 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
342 | 28 | 23 | 1 | 365 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,154 | $ | 44 | $ | 71 | $ | 5 | $ | 1,225 | $ | 49 | ||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
$ | 196 | $ | 4 | $ | 29 | $ | 2 | $ | 225 | $ | 6 | ||||||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
347 | 7 | - | - | 347 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term investments
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
- | - | 27 | 6 | 27 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds
|
397 | 19 | 309 | 17 | 706 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
941 | 30 | 365 | 25 | 1,306 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
65 | 3 | 415 | 26 | 480 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,006 | $ | 33 | $ | 780 | $ | 51 | $ | 1,786 | $ | 84 | ||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Number
of issues
|
Book
value
|
Fair
value
|
Gross
unrealized
gain/loss
|
Gross
investment
income
|
|||||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Taxable fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trading below 70% of book value
|
0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||
|
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value
|
207 | 694 | 680 | (14 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 100% and above of book value
|
1,118 | 4,445 | 4,853 | 408 | 267 | |||||||||||||||
|
Securities sold in current year
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
1,325 | 5,139 | 5,533 | 394 | 304 | |||||||||||||||
|
Tax-exempt fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trading below 70% of book value
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value
|
100 | 186 | 180 | (6 | ) | 8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 100% and above of book value
|
1,153 | 2,563 | 2,670 | 107 | 111 | |||||||||||||||
|
Securities sold in current year
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
1,253 | 2,749 | 2,850 | 101 | 122 | |||||||||||||||
|
Common equities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trading below 70% of book value
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value
|
5 | 365 | 337 | (28 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 100% and above of book value
|
64 | 1,846 | 2,603 | 757 | 75 | |||||||||||||||
|
Securities sold in current year
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
69 | 2,211 | 2,940 | 729 | 90 | |||||||||||||||
|
Preferred equities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trading below 70% of book value
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value
|
4 | 29 | 28 | (1 | ) | 2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 100% and above of book value
|
20 | 46 | 73 | 27 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Securities sold in current year
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
24 | 75 | 101 | 26 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Short-term investments:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trading below 70% of book value
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 100% and above of book value
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Securities sold in current year
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Portfolio summary:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trading below 70% of book value
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value
|
316 | 1,274 | 1,225 | (49 | ) | 38 | ||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 100% and above of book value
|
2,355 | 8,900 | 10,199 | 1,299 | 457 | |||||||||||||||
|
Investment income on securities sold in current year
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
2,671 | $ | 10,174 | $ | 11,424 | $ | 1,250 | $ | 522 | |||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Portfolio summary:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trading below 70% of book value
|
9 | $ | 8 | $ | 5 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 1 | ||||||||||
|
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value
|
346 | 1,862 | 1,781 | (81 | ) | 79 | ||||||||||||||
|
Trading at 100% and above of book value
|
2,150 | 7,666 | 8,776 | 1,110 | 391 | |||||||||||||||
|
Investment income on securities sold in current year
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
2,505 | $ | 9,536 | $ | 10,562 | $ | 1,026 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
·
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
|
|
|
·
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the company; and
|
|
|
·
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Investments
|
||||||||
|
Fixed maturities, at fair value (amortized cost: 2010—$7,888; 2009—$7,514)
|
$ | 8,383 | $ | 7,855 | ||||
|
Equity securities, at fair value (cost: 2010—$2,286; 2009—$2,016)
|
3,041 | 2,701 | ||||||
|
Short-term investments, at fair value (amortized cost: 2010—$0; 2009—$6)
|
- | 6 | ||||||
|
Other invested assets
|
84 | 81 | ||||||
|
Total investments
|
11,508 | 10,643 | ||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
385 | 557 | ||||||
|
Investment income receivable
|
119 | 118 | ||||||
|
Finance receivable
|
73 | 75 | ||||||
|
Premiums receivable
|
1,015 | 995 | ||||||
|
Reinsurance receivable
|
572 | 675 | ||||||
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
18 | 15 | ||||||
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
488 | 481 | ||||||
|
Land, building and equipment, net, for company use (accumulated depreciation: 2010—$352; 2009—$335)
|
229 | 251 | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
67 | 45 | ||||||
|
Separate accounts
|
621 | 585 | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 15,095 | $ | 14,440 | ||||
|
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
|
Insurance reserves
|
||||||||
|
Loss and loss expense reserves
|
$ | 4,200 | $ | 4,142 | ||||
|
Life policy reserves
|
2,034 | 1,783 | ||||||
|
Unearned premiums
|
1,553 | 1,509 | ||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
556 | 670 | ||||||
|
Deferred income tax
|
260 | 152 | ||||||
|
Note payable
|
49 | 49 | ||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
790 | 790 | ||||||
|
Separate accounts
|
621 | 585 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
10,063 | 9,680 | ||||||
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 16)
|
— | — | ||||||
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Common stock, par value—$2 per share; (authorized: 2010—500 million shares, 2009—500 million shares; issued: 2010—196 million shares, 2009—196 million shares)
|
393 | 393 | ||||||
|
Paid-in capital
|
1,091 | 1,081 | ||||||
|
Retained earnings
|
3,980 | 3,862 | ||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
769 | 624 | ||||||
|
Treasury stock at cost (2010—34 million shares, 2009—34 million shares)
|
(1,201 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
5,032 | 4,760 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$ | 15,095 | $ | 14,440 | ||||
|
(In millions except per share data)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
$ | 3,082 | $ | 3,054 | $ | 3,136 | ||||||
|
Investment income, net of expenses
|
518 | 501 | 537 | |||||||||
|
Fee revenues
|
4 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Other revenues
|
9 | 9 | 10 | |||||||||
|
Realized investment gains (losses), net
|
||||||||||||
|
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities
|
(3 | ) | (62 | ) | (163 | ) | ||||||
|
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to Other Comprehensive Income
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
Other realized investment gains (losses), net
|
162 | 398 | 301 | |||||||||
|
Total realized investment gains (losses), net
|
159 | 336 | 138 | |||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
3,772 | 3,903 | 3,824 | |||||||||
|
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||
|
Insurance losses and policyholder benefits
|
2,180 | 2,242 | 2,193 | |||||||||
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses
|
1,021 | 1,004 | 1,016 | |||||||||
|
Other operating expenses
|
16 | 20 | 22 | |||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
54 | 55 | 53 | |||||||||
|
Total benefits and expenses
|
3,271 | 3,321 | 3,284 | |||||||||
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
501 | 582 | 540 | |||||||||
|
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
|
||||||||||||
|
Current
|
94 | 79 | 238 | |||||||||
|
Deferred
|
30 | 71 | (127 | ) | ||||||||
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
124 | 150 | 111 | |||||||||
|
NET INCOME
|
$ | 377 | $ | 432 | $ | 429 | ||||||
|
PER COMMON SHARE
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income—basic
|
$ | 2.32 | $ | 2.66 | $ | 2.63 | ||||||
|
Net income—diluted
|
2.31 | 2.65 | 2.62 | |||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Accumulated
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Stock
|
Other
|
Share-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding
|
Paid-In
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Treasury
|
holders'
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Stock
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
166 | $ | 393 | $ | 1,049 | $ | 3,404 | $ | 2,151 | $ | (1,068 | ) | $ | 5,929 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
- | - | - | 429 | - | - | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss, net
|
- | - | - | - | (1,804 | ) | - | (1,804 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
(1,375 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends declared
|
- | - | - | (254 | ) | - | - | (254 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock options exercised
|
- | - | 4 | - | - | - | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
- | - | 15 | - | - | - | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases
|
(4 | ) | - | - | - | - | (139 | ) | (139 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
- | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance December 31, 2008
|
162 | $ | 393 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 3,579 | $ | 347 | $ | (1,206 | ) | $ | 4,182 | ||||||||||||||
|
Balance December 31, 2008
|
162 | $ | 393 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 3,579 | $ | 347 | $ | (1,206 | ) | $ | 4,182 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
- | - | - | 432 | - | - | 432 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income, net
|
- | - | - | - | 383 | - | 383 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
815 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for other-than-temporary impairments as of April 1, 2009, net of tax
|
- | - | - | 106 | (106 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends declared
|
- | - | - | (255 | ) | - | - | (255 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock options exercised
|
- | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
- | - | 10 | - | - | - | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
- | - | 2 | - | - | 5 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance December 31, 2009
|
162 | $ | 393 | $ | 1,081 | $ | 3,862 | $ | 624 | $ | (1,200 | ) | $ | 4,760 | ||||||||||||||
|
Balance December 31, 2009
|
162 | $ | 393 | $ | 1,081 | $ | 3,862 | $ | 624 | $ | (1,200 | ) | $ | 4,760 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
- | - | - | 377 | - | - | 377 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income, net
|
- | - | - | - | 145 | - | 145 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
522 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends declared
|
- | - | - | (259 | ) | - | - | (259 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock options exercised
|
1 | - | (2 | ) | - | - | 2 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
- | - | 11 | - | - | - | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases
|
- | - | - | - | - | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
- | - | 1 | - | - | 7 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance December 31, 2010
|
163 | $ | 393 | $ | 1,091 | $ | 3,980 | $ | 769 | $ | (1,201 | ) | $ | 5,032 | ||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 377 | $ | 432 | $ | 429 | ||||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items
|
41 | 38 | 32 | |||||||||
|
Realized gains on investments
|
(159 | ) | (336 | ) | (138 | ) | ||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
11 | 10 | 15 | |||||||||
|
Interest credited to contract holders
|
48 | 43 | 34 | |||||||||
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
|
30 | 71 | (127 | ) | ||||||||
|
Changes in:
|
||||||||||||
|
Investment income receivable
|
(1 | ) | (20 | ) | 26 | |||||||
|
Premiums and reinsurance receivable
|
80 | 148 | 43 | |||||||||
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
(23 | ) | (12 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
3 | 10 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Loss and loss expense reserves
|
58 | 56 | 119 | |||||||||
|
Life policy reserves
|
113 | 110 | 67 | |||||||||
|
Unearned premiums
|
44 | (35 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
(18 | ) | 5 | (25 | ) | |||||||
|
Current income tax receivable/payable
|
(73 | ) | 5 | 41 | ||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
531 | 525 | 484 | |||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Sale of fixed maturities
|
199 | 187 | 167 | |||||||||
|
Call or maturity of fixed maturities
|
886 | 659 | 1,029 | |||||||||
|
Sale of equity securities
|
273 | 1,247 | 2,052 | |||||||||
|
Collection of finance receivables
|
29 | 30 | 36 | |||||||||
|
Purchase of fixed maturities
|
(1,483 | ) | (2,135 | ) | (1,695 | ) | ||||||
|
Purchase of equity securities
|
(396 | ) | (796 | ) | (771 | ) | ||||||
|
Change in short-term investments, net
|
7 | 78 | 20 | |||||||||
|
Investment in buildings and equipment, net
|
(17 | ) | (42 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||
|
Investment in finance receivables
|
(27 | ) | (34 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||
|
Change in other invested assets, net
|
- | (9 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||
|
Change in securities lending collateral invested
|
- | - | 741 | |||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(529 | ) | (815 | ) | 1,509 | |||||||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Payment of cash dividends to shareholders
|
(252 | ) | (249 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||||
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
(10 | ) | - | (139 | ) | |||||||
|
Change in notes payable
|
- | - | (20 | ) | ||||||||
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
- | - | 4 | |||||||||
|
Contract holders' funds deposited
|
170 | 162 | 25 | |||||||||
|
Contract holders' funds withdrawn
|
(74 | ) | (66 | ) | (66 | ) | ||||||
|
Change in securities lending payable
|
- | - | (760 | ) | ||||||||
|
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation
|
2 | - | - | |||||||||
|
Other
|
(10 | ) | (9 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(174 | ) | (162 | ) | (1,210 | ) | ||||||
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(172 | ) | (452 | ) | 783 | |||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
557 | 1,009 | 226 | |||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 385 | $ | 557 | $ | 1,009 | ||||||
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest paid (net of capitalized interest: 2010—$0; 2009—$0; 2008—$3)
|
$ | 53 | $ | 55 | $ | 53 | ||||||
|
Income taxes paid
|
167 | 74 | 197 | |||||||||
|
Non-cash activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Conversion of securities
|
$ | 5 | $ | 90 | $ | 25 | ||||||
|
Equipment acquired under capital lease obligations
|
- | 15 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
·
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASU 2010-06 applies to all entities that are required to make disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 requires separate disclosures of the activity in the Level 3 category related to any purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. The effective date of the disclosures regarding Level 3 category purchases, sales, issuances and settlements is for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The portion of ASU 2010-06 that we have not yet adopted will not have a material impact on our company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations as it focuses on additional disclosures.
|
|
|
·
|
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-15, How Investments Held through Separate Accounts Affect an Insurer’s Consolidation Analysis of Those Investments. ASU 2010-15 applies to all insurance entities that have separate accounts that meet the definition and requirements set in the Accounting Standards Codification Manual. ASU 2010-15 clarifies that an insurance entity should not consider any separate account interests held for the benefit of contract holders in an investment to be the insurer’s interests. The insurance entity should not combine those interests with its general account interest in the same investment when assessing the investment for consolidation. The insurance entity may combine those interests when the separate account interests are held for the benefit of
a related-party policyholder as defined in the Variable Interest Subsections of Consolidation topic in the Codification Manual. The effective date of the amendments in this update is for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update do not modify the disclosures currently required by GAAP and are not expected to have a material impact on our company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
|
|
|
·
|
In October 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-26, Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts. ASU 2010-26 modifies the definitions of the type of costs incurred by insurance entities that can be capitalized in the successful acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts. ASU 2010-26 requires incremental direct costs of successful contract acquisition as well as certain costs related to underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical and inspection and sales force contract selling for successful contract acquisition to be capitalized. These incremental direct costs and other costs are those that are essential to the contract transaction and would not have been incurred had the contract transaction not occurred. The effective date of ASU 2010-26 is
for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The ASU has not yet been adopted, and we are currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on our company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
|
|
|
·
|
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, Technical Corrections to Various Topics. ASU 2010-08 does not change any of the fundamentals of GAAP, but it does explain certain clarifications made to the guidance on embedded derivatives and hedging. We have adopted ASU 2010-08, effective for the first reporting period after issuance and for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009. It did not have a material impact on our company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
|
|
|
·
|
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events. ASU 2010-09 removes the requirement for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filers to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. We have adopted ASU 2010-09, effective for the first reporting period after issuance. It did not have a material impact on our company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
|
|
|
·
|
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. ASU 2010-20 will improve transparency in financial reporting for companies that hold financing receivables, which include loans, lease receivables and other long-term receivables. The additional disclosures required by ASU 2010-20 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The ASU did not have a material impact on our company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Investment income summarized by investment category:
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest on fixed maturities
|
$ | 423 | $ | 402 | $ | 326 | ||||||
|
Dividends on equity securities
|
99 | 100 | 204 | |||||||||
|
Other investment income
|
4 | 7 | 14 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
526 | 509 | 544 | |||||||||
|
Less investment expenses
|
8 | 8 | 7 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 518 | $ | 501 | $ | 537 | ||||||
|
Realized investment gains and losses summary:
|
||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Gross realized gains
|
$ | 25 | $ | 15 | $ | 4 | ||||||
|
Gross realized losses
|
(12 | ) | (30 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||
|
Other-than-temporary impairments
|
(3 | ) | (62 | ) | (163 | ) | ||||||
|
Equity securities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Gross realized gains
|
174 | 624 | 1,020 | |||||||||
|
Gross realized losses
|
0 | (162 | ) | (280 | ) | |||||||
|
Other-than-temporary impairments
|
(33 | ) | (69 | ) | (347 | ) | ||||||
|
Securities with embedded derivatives
|
10 | 27 | (38 | ) | ||||||||
|
Other
|
(2 | ) | (7 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 159 | $ | 336 | $ | 138 | ||||||
|
Change in unrealized investment gains and losses and other summary:
|
||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities
|
$ | 154 | $ | 734 | $ | (296 | ) | |||||
|
Equity securities
|
70 | (134 | ) | (2,455 | ) | |||||||
|
Adjustment to deferred acquisition costs and life policy reserves
|
(9 | ) | (24 | ) | 19 | |||||||
|
Pension obligations
|
3 | (14 | ) | (15 | ) | |||||||
|
Other
|
5 | 28 | (34 | ) | ||||||||
|
Income taxes on above
|
(78 | ) | (207 | ) | 977 | |||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 145 | $ | 383 | $ | (1,804 | ) | |||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Amortized
|
Fair
|
% of fair
|
|||||||||
|
cost
|
value
|
value
|
||||||||||
|
Maturity dates occurring:
|
||||||||||||
|
Less than 1 year
|
$ | 277 | $ | 283 | 3.4 | % | ||||||
|
Years 1 - 5
|
2,527 | 2,682 | 32.0 | |||||||||
|
Years 6 - 10
|
3,619 | 3,923 | 46.8 | |||||||||
|
Years 11 - 20
|
1,236 | 1,258 | 15.0 | |||||||||
|
Over 20 years
|
229 | 237 | 2.8 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 7,888 | $ | 8,383 | 100.0 | % | ||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Cost or
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
amortized
|
Gross unrealized
|
Fair
|
OTTI in
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2010
|
cost
|
gains
|
losses
|
value
|
AOCI
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
$ | 3,043 | $ | 110 | $ | 10 | $ | 3,143 | $ | - | ||||||||||
|
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached
|
69 | - | - | 69 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
United States government
|
4 | 1 | - | 5 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
201 | - | 1 | 200 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Foreign government
|
3 | - | - | 3 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Corporate securities
|
4,568 | 404 | 9 | 4,963 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
7,888 | 515 | 20 | 8,383 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common equities
|
2,211 | 757 | 28 | 2,940 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred equities
|
75 | 27 | 1 | 101 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
2,286 | 784 | 29 | 3,041 |
NA
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 10,174 | $ | 1,299 | $ | 49 | $ | 11,424 | ||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
$ | 3,007 | $ | 128 | $ | 6 | $ | 3,129 | $ | - | ||||||||||
|
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached
|
91 | - | - | 91 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
United States government
|
4 | - | - | 4 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
354 | - | 7 | 347 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Foreign government
|
3 | - | - | 3 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Short-term investments
|
6 | - | - | 6 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
37 | - | 6 | 31 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds
|
4,018 | 268 | 36 | 4,250 | - | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 7,520 | $ | 396 | $ | 55 | $ | 7,861 | $ | - | ||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
$ | 2,016 | $ | 714 | $ | 29 | $ | 2,701 |
NA
|
|||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Less than 12 months
|
12 months or more
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2010
|
value
|
losses
|
value
|
losses
|
value
|
losses
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
$ | 325 | $ | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 1 | $ | 334 | $ | 10 | ||||||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
133 | 1 | - | - | 133 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate securities
|
354 | 6 | 39 | 3 | 393 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
812 | 16 | 48 | 4 | 860 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common equities
|
337 | 28 | - | - | 337 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred equities
|
5 | - | 23 | 1 | 28 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
342 | 28 | 23 | 1 | 365 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,154 | $ | 44 | $ | 71 | $ | 5 | $ | 1,225 | $ | 49 | ||||||||||||
|
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
$ | 196 | $ | 4 | $ | 29 | $ | 2 | $ | 225 | $ | 6 | ||||||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
347 | 7 | - | - | 347 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term investments
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
- | - | 27 | 6 | 27 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds
|
397 | 19 | 309 | 17 | 706 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
941 | 30 | 365 | 25 | 1,306 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
65 | 3 | 415 | 26 | 480 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,006 | $ | 33 | $ | 780 | $ | 51 | $ | 1,786 | $ | 84 | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities
|
$ | 3 | $ | 62 | $ | 163 | ||||||
|
Equity securities
|
33 | 69 | 347 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 36 | $ | 131 | $ | 510 | ||||||
|
|
·
|
Level 1 – Financial assets and liabilities for which inputs are observable and are obtained from reliable quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. This is the most reliable fair value measurement and includes, for example, active exchange-traded equity securities.
|
|
|
·
|
Level 2 – Financial assets and liabilities for which values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which values are based on similar assets and liabilities that are actively traded. This also includes pricing models for which the inputs are corroborated by market data.
|
|
|
·
|
Level 3 – Financial assets and liabilities for which values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Level 3 inputs include the following:
|
|
|
o
|
Quotes from brokers or other external sources that are not considered binding;
|
|
|
o
|
Quotes from brokers or other external sources where it cannot be determined that market participants would in fact transact for the asset or liability at the quoted price;
|
|
|
o
|
Quotes from brokers or other external sources where the inputs are not deemed observable.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Asset fair value measurements at December 31, 2010 using:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate securities
|
$ | - | $ | 4,943 | $ | 20 | $ | 4,963 | ||||||||
|
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached
|
- | 69 | - | 69 | ||||||||||||
|
Foreign government
|
- | 3 | - | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
United States government
|
5 | - | - | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
- | 200 | - | 200 | ||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
- | 3,139 | 4 | 3,143 | ||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
5 | 8,354 | 24 | 8,383 | ||||||||||||
|
Common equities, available for sale
|
2,940 | - | - | 2,940 | ||||||||||||
|
Preferred equities, available for sale
|
- | 96 | 5 | 101 | ||||||||||||
|
Taxable fixed maturities separate accounts
|
- | 606 | 2 | 608 | ||||||||||||
|
Top Hat Savings Plan
|
9 | - | - | 9 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,954 | $ | 9,056 | $ | 31 | $ | 12,041 | ||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Asset fair value measurements at December 31, 2009 using:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate securities
|
$ | - | $ | 4,314 | $ | 27 | $ | 4,341 | ||||||||
|
Foreign government
|
- | 3 | - | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
|
4 | 347 | - | 351 | ||||||||||||
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
- | 31 | - | 31 | ||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
- | 3,125 | 4 | 3,129 | ||||||||||||
|
Taxable fixed maturities separate accounts
|
- | 555 | - | 555 | ||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
4 | 8,375 | 31 | 8,410 | ||||||||||||
|
Common equities, available for sale
|
2,474 | 134 | - | 2,608 | ||||||||||||
|
Preferred equities, available for sale
|
- | 88 | 5 | 93 | ||||||||||||
|
Short-term investments
|
- | 6 | - | 6 | ||||||||||||
|
Top Hat Savings Plan
|
7 | - | - | 7 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,485 | $ | 8,603 | $ | 36 | $ | 11,124 | ||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Asset fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate
fixed
maturities
|
Taxable fixed
maturities-
separate accounts
|
States,
municipalities
and political
subdivisions
fixed
maturities
|
Common
equities
|
Preferred
equities
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Beginning balance, January 1, 2010
|
$ | 27 | $ | - | $ | 4 | $ | - | $ | 5 | $ | 36 | ||||||||||||
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
2 | - | - | - | - | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
|
(3 | ) | 2 | - | - | - | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Transfers into Level 3
|
4 | - | - | - | - | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Transfers out of Level 3
|
(10 | ) | - | - | - | - | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Ending balance, December 31, 2010
|
$ | 20 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | $ | - | $ | 5 | $ | 31 | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Asset fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Taxable
fixed
maturities
|
Taxable fixed
maturities-
separate accounts
|
Tax-exempt
fixed
maturities
|
Common
equities
|
Preferred
equities
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Beginning balance, January 1, 2009
|
$ | 50 | $ | 6 | $ | 5 | $ | 64 | $ | 22 | $ | 147 | ||||||||||||
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)
|
- | - | - | - | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | (3 | ) | 5 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
|
5 | - | (1 | ) | (61 | ) | (4 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
(28 | ) | (6 | ) | - | - | (15 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Ending balance, December 31, 2009
|
$ | 27 | $ | - | $ | 4 | $ | - | $ | 5 | $ | 36 | ||||||||||||
|
4.
|
Deferred Acquisition Costs
|
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs asset, beginning of year
|
$ | 481 | $ | 509 | $ | 461 | ||||||
|
Capitalized deferred policy acquisition costs
|
676 | 650 | 649 | |||||||||
|
Amortized deferred policy acquisition costs
|
(653 | ) | (638 | ) | (632 | ) | ||||||
|
Amortized shadow deferred policy acquisition costs
|
(16 | ) | (40 | ) | 31 | |||||||
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs asset, end of year
|
$ | 488 | $ | 481 | $ | 509 | ||||||
|
5.
|
Property Casualty Loss and Loss Expenses
|
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Gross loss and loss expense reserves, January 1,
|
$ | 4,096 | $ | 4,040 | $ | 3,925 | ||||||
|
Less reinsurance receivable
|
435 | 542 | 528 | |||||||||
|
Net loss and loss expense reserves, January 1,
|
3,661 | 3,498 | 3,397 | |||||||||
|
Net incurred loss and loss expenses related to:
|
||||||||||||
|
Current accident year
|
2,319 | 2,274 | 2,379 | |||||||||
|
Prior accident years
|
(304 | ) | (188 | ) | (323 | ) | ||||||
|
Total incurred
|
2,015 | 2,086 | 2,056 | |||||||||
|
Net paid loss and loss expenses related to:
|
||||||||||||
|
Current accident year
|
939 | 929 | 976 | |||||||||
|
Prior accident years
|
926 | 994 | 979 | |||||||||
|
Total paid
|
1,865 | 1,923 | 1,955 | |||||||||
|
Net loss and loss expense reserves, December 31,
|
3,811 | 3,661 | 3,498 | |||||||||
|
Plus reinsurance receivable
|
326 | 435 | 542 | |||||||||
|
Gross loss and loss expense reserves, December 31,
|
$ | 4,137 | $ | 4,096 | $ | 4,040 | ||||||
|
6.
|
Life Policy Reserves
|
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
Ordinary/traditional life
|
$ | 628 | $ | 579 | ||||
|
Universal life
|
459 | 450 | ||||||
|
Deferred annuities
|
730 | 539 | ||||||
|
Investment contracts
|
200 | 197 | ||||||
|
Other
|
17 | 18 | ||||||
|
Total gross reserves
|
$ | 2,034 | $ | 1,783 | ||||
|
7.
|
Notes Payable
|
|
8.
|
Senior Debt
|
|
(In millions)
|
Book value
|
Principal amount
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate
|
Year of issue
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||
| 6.900 | % | 1998 |
Senior debentures, due 2028
|
$ | 28 | $ | 28 | $ | 28 | $ | 28 | |||||||||||
| 6.920 | % | 2005 |
Senior debentures, due 2028
|
391 | 391 | 391 | 391 | |||||||||||||||
| 6.125 | % | 2004 |
Senior notes, due 2034
|
371 | 371 | 374 | 374 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 790 | $ | 790 | $ | 793 | $ | 793 | ||||||||||||||
|
9.
|
Shareholders’ Equity and Dividend Restrictions
|
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Before
|
Income
|
Before
|
Income
|
Before
|
Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
tax
|
tax
|
Net
|
tax
|
tax
|
Net
|
tax
|
tax
|
Net
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated unrealized gains on investments available for sale and other at January 1,
|
$ | 1,012 | $ | 345 | $ | 667 | $ | 570 | $ | 189 | $ | 381 | $ | 3,336 | $ | 1,161 | $ | 2,175 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
(Decrease)/increase in unrealized gains
|
387 | 136 | 251 | 936 | 330 | 606 | (2,618 | ) | (915 | ) | (1,703 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for other-than-temporary impairments
|
0 | 0 | 0 | (163 | ) | (57 | ) | (106 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income
|
(159 | ) | (56 | ) | (103 | ) | (336 | ) | (119 | ) | (217 | ) | (138 | ) | (53 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Adjustment to deferred acquisition costs and life policy reserves
|
(8 | ) | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | 5 | 2 | 3 | (10 | ) | (4 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Effect on other comprehensive income
|
220 | 77 | 143 | 442 | 156 | 286 | (2,766 | ) | (972 | ) | (1,794 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated unrealized gains on investments available for sale and other at December 31,
|
$ | 1,232 | $ | 422 | $ | 810 | $ | 1,012 | $ | 345 | $ | 667 | $ | 570 | $ | 189 | $ | 381 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated unrealized losses for pension obligations at January 1,
|
$ | (66 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (18 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | $ | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Change in pension obligations
|
3 | 1 | 2 | (14 | ) | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | (15 | ) | (5 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated unrealized losses for pension obligations at December 31,
|
$ | (63 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (41 | ) | $ | (66 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (18 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income at January 1,
|
$ | 946 | $ | 322 | $ | 624 | $ | 518 | $ | 171 | $ | 347 | $ | 3,299 | $ | 1,148 | $ | 2,151 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized investment gains and losses and other adjustments
|
220 | 77 | 143 | 442 | 156 | 286 | (2,766 | ) | (972 | ) | (1,794 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in pension obligations
|
3 | 1 | 2 | (14 | ) | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | (15 | ) | (5 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31,
|
$ | 1,169 | $ | 400 | $ | 769 | $ | 946 | $ | 322 | $ | 624 | $ | 518 | $ | 171 | $ | 347 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
10.
|
Reinsurance
|
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Direct earned premiums
|
$ | 3,080 | $ | 3,068 | $ | 3,175 | ||||||
|
Assumed earned premiums
|
10 | 12 | 13 | |||||||||
|
Ceded earned premiums
|
(166 | ) | (169 | ) | (178 | ) | ||||||
|
Net earned premiums
|
$ | 2,924 | $ | 2,911 | $ | 3,010 | ||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Direct incurred loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 2,003 | $ | 2,135 | $ | 2,172 | ||||||
|
Assumed incurred loss and loss expenses
|
11 | 10 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Ceded incurred loss and loss expenses
|
(4 | ) | (63 | ) | (126 | ) | ||||||
|
Net incurred loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 2,010 | $ | 2,082 | $ | 2,051 | ||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Direct earned premiums
|
$ | 211 | $ | 196 | $ | 180 | ||||||
|
Assumed earned premiums
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Ceded earned premiums
|
(53 | ) | (53 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||||
|
Net earned premiums
|
$ | 158 | $ | 143 | $ | 126 | ||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Direct contract holders' benefits incurred
|
$ | 233 | $ | 201 | $ | 175 | ||||||
|
Assumed contract holders' benefits incurred
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Ceded contract holders' benefits incurred
|
(63 | ) | (41 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||
|
Net incurred loss and loss expenses
|
$ | 170 | $ | 160 | $ | 142 | ||||||
|
11.
|
Income Taxes
|
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||
|
Loss and loss expense reserves
|
$ | 182 | $ | 182 | ||||
|
Unearned premiums
|
107 | 104 | ||||||
|
Investments
|
31 | 40 | ||||||
|
Other
|
34 | 31 | ||||||
|
Total
|
354 | 357 | ||||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Unrealized investment gains and losses
|
(411 | ) | (332 | ) | ||||
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
(157 | ) | (152 | ) | ||||
|
Other
|
(46 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
|
Total
|
(614 | ) | (509 | ) | ||||
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
$ | (260 | ) | $ | (152 | ) | ||
|
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Tax at statutory rate
|
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
||||||||||||
|
Tax-exempt income from municipal bonds
|
(7.2 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (6.2 | ) | ||||||
|
Dividend received exclusion
|
(3.8 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (8.9 | ) | ||||||
|
Other
|
0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | |||||||||
|
Effective rate
|
24.8 | % | 25.7 | % | 20.7 | % | ||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at January 1,
|
$ | 0 | $ | 2 | $ | 14 | ||||||
|
Gross increase in prior year positions
|
0 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Gross decrease in prior year positions
|
0 | (2 | ) | 0 | ||||||||
|
Gross increase in current year positions
|
0 | 0 | 2 | |||||||||
|
Settlements with tax authorities
|
0 | 0 | (17 | ) | ||||||||
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31,
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 2 | ||||||
|
12.
|
Net Income Per Common Share
|
|
(In millions except per share data)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Numerator:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income—basic and diluted
|
$ | 377 | $ | 432 | $ | 429 | ||||||
|
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
162,777,695 | 162,595,041 | 163,150,329 | |||||||||
|
Effect of stock based awards
|
496,796 | 271,822 | 212,080 | |||||||||
|
Adjusted diluted weighted-average shares
|
163,274,491 | 162,866,863 | 163,362,409 | |||||||||
|
Earnings per share:
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 2.32 | $ | 2.66 | $ | 2.63 | ||||||
|
Diluted
|
2.31 | 2.65 | 2.62 | |||||||||
|
Number of anti-dilutive stock based awards
|
9,538,350 | 9,875,411 | 9,781,652 | |||||||||
|
Exercise price of anti-dilutive stock based awards
|
$ | 26.58-45.26 | $ | 25.08-45.26 | $ | 25.08-45.26 | ||||||
|
13.
|
Employee Retirement Benefits
|
|
Qualified Pension Plan
|
SERP
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
|
Discount rate
|
5.85 | % | 6.10 | % | 5.55 | % | 6.10 | % | ||||||||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
3.50-5.50 | 4.00-6.00 | 3.50-5.50 | 4.00-6.00 | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
Change in projected benefit obligation:
|
||||||||
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$ | 221 | $ | 206 | ||||
|
Service cost
|
10 | 10 | ||||||
|
Interest cost
|
14 | 12 | ||||||
|
Actuarial loss
|
6 | 2 | ||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(6 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
|
Settlement
|
0 | (2 | ) | |||||
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
$ | 245 | $ | 221 | ||||
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
$ | 213 | $ | 186 | ||||
|
Change in plan assets:
|
||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
$ | 144 | $ | 118 | ||||
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
20 | 0 | ||||||
|
Employer contributions
|
25 | 33 | ||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(6 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
$ | 183 | $ | 144 | ||||
|
Unfunded status:
|
||||||||
|
Unfunded status at end of year
|
$ | (62 | ) | $ | (77 | ) | ||
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
Pension amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consists of:
|
||||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
$ | (62 | ) | $ | (77 | ) | ||
|
Total
|
$ | (62 | ) | $ | (77 | ) | ||
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs consist of:
|
||||||||
|
Net actuarial loss
|
$ | 60 | $ | 63 | ||||
|
Prior service cost
|
3 | 3 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 63 | $ | 66 | ||||
|
Qualified Pension Plan
|
SERP
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Discount rate
|
6.10 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 6.10 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.25 | % | ||||||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
4.00-6.00 | 4.00-6.00 | 4.00-6.00 | 4.00-6.00 | 4.00-6.00 | 4.00-6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Service cost
|
$ | 10 | $ | 10 | $ | 14 | ||||||
|
Interest cost
|
14 | 12 | 17 | |||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(14 | ) | (12 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||
|
Amortization of actuarial loss, prior service cost and transition asset
|
2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
|
Curtailment
|
0 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Settlement
|
0 | 0 | 27 | |||||||||
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 12 | $ | 11 | $ | 47 | ||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Current year actuarial loss
|
$ | 0 | $ | 15 | $ | 73 | ||||||
|
Recognition of actuarial (loss) gain
|
(2 | ) | 0 | (54 | ) | |||||||
|
Recognition of prior service cost
|
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive income
|
$ | (3 | ) | $ | 14 | $ | 15 | |||||
|
(In millions)
|
Asset fair value measurements at December 31, 2010 using:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Quoted prices in
active markets
for
identical
assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate securities
|
$ | - | $ | 27 | $ | - | $ | 27 | ||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
- | 21 | - | 21 | ||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities, available for sale
|
- | 48 | - | 48 | ||||||||||||
|
Common equities, available for sale
|
122 | - | - | 122 | ||||||||||||
|
Preferred equities, available for sale
|
4 | - | - | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 126 | $ | 48 | $ | - | $ | 174 | ||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Asset fair value measurements at December 31, 2009 using:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Money market fund
|
$ | 23 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 23 | ||||||||
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate securities
|
- | 28 | - | 28 | ||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
- | 1 | - | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities, available for sale
|
- | 29 | - | 29 | ||||||||||||
|
Common equities, available for sale
|
89 | - | - | 89 | ||||||||||||
|
Preferred equities, available for sale
|
3 | - | - | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 115 | $ | 29 | $ | - | $ | 144 | ||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the years ended December 31,
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016 - 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Expected future benefit payments
|
$ | 17 | $ | 20 | $ | 21 | $ | 16 | $ | 16 | $ | 121 | ||||||||||||
|
14.
|
Statutory Accounting Information (unaudited)
|
|
|
·
|
valuation of unrealized investment gains and losses,
|
|
|
·
|
expensing of policy acquisition costs,
|
|
|
·
|
actuarial assumptions for life insurance reserves and
|
|
|
·
|
deferred income taxes based on differences in statutory and taxable income.
|
|
(In millions)
|
SAP Net Income (Loss)
|
Capital and Surplus
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Years ended December 31,
|
At December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
|
$ | 318 | $ | 339 | $ | 194 | $ | 3,777 | $ | 3,648 | ||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Casualty Company
|
10 | 29 | 16 | 269 | 254 | |||||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Indemnity Company
|
2 | 8 | 2 | 70 | 67 | |||||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
|
1 | (7 | ) | (38 | ) | 172 | 168 | |||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company
|
15 | 15 | (70 | ) | 303 | 300 | ||||||||||||||
|
15.
|
Transactions with Affiliated Parties
|
|
16.
|
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
|
|
17.
|
Stock-Based Associate Compensation Plans
|
|
|
·
|
Weighted-average expected term is based on historical experience of similar awards with consideration for current exercise trends.
|
|
|
·
|
Expected volatility is based on our stock price over a historical period that approximates the expected term.
|
|
|
·
|
Dividend yield is determined by dividing the annualized per share dividend by the stock price on the date of grant.
|
|
|
·
|
Risk-free rates are the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with a remaining term approximating the expected term.
|
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||
|
Weighted - average expected term
|
8 years
|
n/a |
7-9 years
|
||||||||
|
Expected volatility
|
27.11-27.16 | % | n/a | 20.58-28.52 | % | ||||||
|
Dividend yield
|
5.41-5.94 | % | n/a | 3.99-6.22 | % | ||||||
|
Risk-free rates
|
3.49-3.52 | % | n/a | 3.29-3.84 | % | ||||||
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period
|
$ | 5.13 | n/a | $ | 6.50 | ||||||
|
(Dollars in millions, shares in thousands)
|
Shares
|
Weighted-
average
exercise
price
|
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
|
|||||||||
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
|
9,875 | $ | 36.67 | |||||||||
|
Granted
|
902 | 26.60 | ||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(11 | ) | 26.74 | |||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(1,076 | ) | 28.99 | |||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
9,690 | 36.59 | $ | 9 | ||||||||
|
Options exercisable at end of period
|
8,298 | $ | 37.92 | $ | 3 | |||||||
|
(Shares in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Options outstanding
|
Options exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Range of exercise prices
|
Shares
|
Weighted-average
remaining
contractual
life
|
Weighted-
average
exercise
price
|
Shares
|
Weighted-
average
exercise
price
|
|||||||||||||||||
| $25.00 to $29.99 | 1,677 | 8.42 |
yrs
|
$ | 26.59 | 526 | $ | 26.57 | ||||||||||||||
| $30.00 to $34.99 | 2,931 | 1.12 |
yrs
|
33.41 | 2,931 | 33.41 | ||||||||||||||||
| $35.00 to $39.99 | 1,973 | 4.39 |
yrs
|
38.75 | 1,732 | 38.75 | ||||||||||||||||
| $40.00 to $44.99 | 1,868 | 4.52 |
yrs
|
42.55 | 1,868 | 42.55 | ||||||||||||||||
| $45.00 to $49.99 | 1,241 | 4.91 |
yrs
|
45.26 | 1,241 | 45.26 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
9,690 | 4.19 |
yrs
|
36.59 | 8,298 | 37.92 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
·
|
Correlation coefficients are based upon the price data used to calculate the historical volatilities. The correlation coefficients are used to model the way in which each entity tends to move in relation to each other.
|
|
|
·
|
Expected volatility is based on our stock price over a historical period that approximates the expected term. We have used the historical volatilities over a range of 2.76-2.86 years for 2010 grants and 3.13 years for 2008 grants.
|
|
|
·
|
Dividend yield has been modeled assuming that the holder of the award is not entitled to receive dividends that are paid during the performance period. Dividend yield range from 5.41%-5.94% for 2010 grants and 5.87% for 2008 grants.
|
|
|
·
|
Risk-free rates are equal to the yield, as of the measurement date, of the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bill that is commensurate with the performance period. Risk free rates used range from 1.43%-1.50% for 2010 grants and 1.58% for 2008 grants.
|
|
(Shares in thousands)
|
Service-based
nonvested shares
|
Weighted-
average grant-
date fair value
|
Performance-based
nonvested
shares
|
Weighted-
average grant-
date fair value
|
||||||||||||
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2010
|
597 | $ | 31.60 | 121 | $ | 29.93 | ||||||||||
|
Granted
|
290 | 22.27 | 52 | 23.97 | ||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(158 | ) | 40.34 | 0 | 0.00 | |||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(13 | ) | 25.97 | 0 | 0.00 | |||||||||||
|
Cancelled
|
0 | 0.00 | (24 | ) | 40.74 | |||||||||||
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2010
|
716 | 26.00 | 149 | 26.08 | ||||||||||||
|
18.
|
Segment Information
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial lines property casualty insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Personal lines property casualty insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Excess and Surplus lines property casualty insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
·
|
Investment operations
|
|
|
·
|
All four insurance segments record revenues from insurance premiums earned. Life insurance segment revenues also include separate account investment management fees.
|
|
|
·
|
Fee revenues for the commercial and personal insurance segments primarily represent installment fees. Previously the fee revenues were reflected in Other. Prior period data included in this annual report has been adjusted to reflect this new presentation.
|
|
|
·
|
Our investment operations’ revenues are pretax net investment income plus realized investment gains and losses.
|
|
|
·
|
Other revenues are primarily finance/lease income.
|
|
·
|
Income before income taxes for the insurance segments is defined as underwriting income or loss.
|
|
|
o
|
For commercial lines, personal lines and excess and surplus insurance segments, we calculate underwriting income or loss by recording premiums earned minus loss and loss expenses and underwriting expenses incurred.
|
|
|
o
|
For the life insurance segment, we calculate underwriting income or loss by recording premiums earned and separate account investment management fees, minus contract holders’ benefits and expenses incurred, plus investment interest credited to contract holders.
|
|
|
·
|
Income before income taxes for the investment operations segment is net investment income plus realized investment gains and losses for investments of the entire company, minus investment interest credited to contract holders of the life insurance segment.
|
|
|
·
|
Loss before income taxes for the Other category is primarily due to interest expense from debt of the parent company and operating expenses of our headquarters.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial casualty
|
$ | 693 | $ | 712 | $ | 763 | ||||||
|
Commercial property
|
489 | 485 | 487 | |||||||||
|
Commercial auto
|
384 | 394 | 411 | |||||||||
|
Workers' compensation
|
311 | 326 | 375 | |||||||||
|
Specialty packages
|
149 | 147 | 144 | |||||||||
|
Surety and executive risk
|
95 | 104 | 107 | |||||||||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
33 | 31 | 29 | |||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance premiums
|
2,154 | 2,199 | 2,316 | |||||||||
|
Fee revenue
|
2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
Total commercial lines insurance
|
2,156 | 2,201 | 2,318 | |||||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
||||||||||||
|
Personal auto
|
337 | 319 | 325 | |||||||||
|
Homeowner
|
289 | 276 | 277 | |||||||||
|
Other personal lines
|
95 | 90 | 87 | |||||||||
|
Personal lines insurance premiums
|
721 | 685 | 689 | |||||||||
|
Fee revenue
|
2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
|
Total personal lines insurance
|
723 | 686 | 690 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
49 | 27 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
159 | 143 | 128 | |||||||||
|
Investment operations
|
677 | 837 | 675 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
8 | 9 | 8 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 3,772 | $ | 3,903 | $ | 3,824 | ||||||
|
Income (loss) before income taxes:
|
||||||||||||
|
Insurance underwriting results:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 15 | $ | (33 | ) | $ | 72 | |||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
(54 | ) | (80 | ) | (81 | ) | ||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
(8 | ) | (15 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
|
Life insurance
|
7 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
|
Investment operations
|
598 | 768 | 612 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
(57 | ) | (60 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 501 | $ | 582 | $ | 540 | ||||||
|
Identifiable assets:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||
|
Property casualty insurance
|
$ | 2,008 | $ | 2,237 | ||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
1,214 | 1,176 | ||||||||||
|
Investment operations
|
11,543 | 10,684 | ||||||||||
|
Other
|
330 | 343 | ||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 15,095 | $ | 14,440 | ||||||||
|
19.
|
Quarterly Supplementary Data (unaudited)
|
|
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
|
Quarter
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
1
st
|
2
nd
|
3
rd
|
4
th
|
Full year
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues *
|
$ | 887 | $ | 878 | $ | 1,071 | $ | 936 | $ | 3,772 | ||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
85 | 21 | 221 | 174 | 501 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
68 | 27 | 156 | 126 | 377 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net income per common share—basic
|
0.42 | 0.17 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 2.32 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net income per common share—diluted
|
0.42 | 0.17 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 2.31 | |||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues *
|
$ | 890 | $ | 874 | $ | 1,007 | $ | 1,133 | $ | 3,903 | ||||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
34 | (50 | ) | 244 | 355 | 582 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
35 | (19 | ) | 171 | 245 | 432 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) per common share—basic
|
0.22 | (0.12 | ) | 1.05 | 1.50 | 2.66 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) per common share—diluted
|
0.22 | (0.12 | ) | 1.05 | 1.50 | 2.65 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
*
|
Revenues including realized investment gains and losses, which are integral to our financial results over the long term, may cause this value to fluctuate substantially because we have substantial discretion in the timing of investment sales. Also, applicable accounting standards require us to recognize gains and losses from certain changes in fair values of securities and embedded derivatives without actual realization of those gains and losses. We discuss realized investment gains for the past three years in Item 7, Investments Results of Operations,
Page 75.
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
·
|
information required to be disclosed in the company’s reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and
|
|
|
·
|
such information is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other Information
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
a)
|
The following sections of our Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 30, 2011, are incorporated herein by reference: “Security Ownership of Principal Shareholders and Management,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Information about the Board of Directors,” and “Governance of Your Company,”
|
|
|
b)
|
Information about the “Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers” appeared in the 2004 Proxy Statement as an appendix and is available at
www.cinfin.com/investors
. Our Code of Ethics applies to those who are responsible for preparing and disclosing our financial information. This includes our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and others performing similar functions or reporting directly to these officers.
|
|
|
c)
|
Set forth below is information concerning the company’s executive officers who are not also directors of the company, as of February 25, 2011.
|
|
Name and Age
as of
February 25
|
Primary Title(s) and Business Responsibilities
Since February 2006
|
Executive
Officer
Since
|
||
|
Donald J. Doyle, Jr., CPCU, AIM (44)
|
Senior vice president of The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Responsible since 2007 for excess and surplus lines underwriting and operations; responsible until 2007 for internal audit.
|
2008
|
||
|
Craig W. Forrester, CLU (52)
|
Senior vice president and chief technology officer of The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Responsible for information technology hardware systems and new technologies.
|
2003
|
||
|
Martin F. Hollenbeck, CFA, CPCU (51)
|
President and chief operating officer since 2008 of CFC Investment Company, a subsidiary. President from 2008 to 2009 of CinFin Capital Management Company, a former subsidiary. Chief investment officer since 2009, senior vice president, assistant secretary and assistant treasurer since 2008 of Cincinnati Financial Corporation. Chief investment officer and senior vice president since 2009 of The Cincinnati Insurance Company; vice president until 2009. Responsible for investment operations and leasing and financing services; responsible until 2009 for asset management services operations.
|
2008
|
||
|
Steven J. Johnston, FCAS, MAAA, CFA (51)
|
Senior vice president, chief financial officer and secretary since 2008 of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Treasurer since 2008 of Cincinnati Financial. From 2006 to 2008, consulted on risk management, economic capital and executive compensation modeling, and agency valuation. Until 2006, chief financial officer, senior vice president and treasurer of State Auto Financial Corporation.
|
2008
|
||
|
Thomas A. Joseph, CPCU (55)
|
President since 2008 of The Cincinnati Casualty Company. Senior vice president of The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Responsible for property casualty reinsurance and for personal lines underwriting and operations; responsible until 2008 for commercial lines underwriting operations except machinery and equipment.
|
2003
|
|
Name and Age
as of
February 25
|
Primary Title(s) and Business Responsibilities
Since February 2006
|
Executive
Officer
Since
|
||
|
John S. Kellington (49)
|
Senior vice president and chief information officer of The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Responsible for enterprise strategic technology and all technology activities. From 2007 to 2010, senior vice president of ACORD Corporation, a nonprofit group that develops global insurance standards. Until 2007, senior vice president and chief technology officer of Ohio Casualty Group.
|
2010
|
||
|
Eric N. Mathews, CPCU, AIAF (55)
|
Principal accounting officer since 2008 and vice president, assistant secretary and assistant treasurer. Senior vice president of The Cincinnati Insurance Company.
|
2001
|
||
|
Martin J. Mullen, CPCU (55)
|
Senior vice president and chief claims officer since 2008 of The Cincinnati Insurance Company; vice president until 2008. Responsible for headquarters and field claims operations, special investigations unit and claims administration; responsible until 2008 for casualty claims.
|
2008
|
||
|
David H. Popplewell, FALU, LLIF
(66)
|
President and chief operating officer of The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company. Responsible for life insurance underwriting and operations.
|
1997
|
||
|
Jacob F. Scherer, Jr. (58)
|
Executive vice president since 2008 of The Cincinnati Insurance Company; senior vice president until 2008. Responsible for sales and marketing, including new commercial lines business, relationships with independent agencies and, since 2008, meetings and travel.
|
1995
|
||
|
Joan O. Shevchik, CPCU, CLU (60)
|
Senior vice president of The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Responsible for corporate communications.
|
2003
|
||
|
Charles P. Stoneburner II, CPCU, AIM (58)
|
Senior vice president since 2008 of The Cincinnati Insurance Company; vice president until 2008. Responsible for commercial lines underwriting and operations, loss control, premium audit and staff underwriting; responsible until 2008 for field claims operations.
|
2008
|
||
|
Timothy L. Timmel (62)
|
Senior vice president of The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Responsible for operations including corporate communications, government relations, learning and development, legal, personnel and, since 2008, administrative services, data entry, facilities, maintenance, printing, regulatory and consumer relations, security and information security; also responsible until 2008 for field claims operations.
|
1997
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
a)
|
The “Security Ownership of Principal Shareholders and Management” section of our Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 30, 2011, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
b)
|
Information on securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans appears in Part II, Item 5, Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities,
Page 31
. Additional information on share-based compensation under our equity compensation plans is available in Item 8, Note 17 of the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Page 125
.
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
a)
|
Financial Statements – information contained in Part II, Item 8, of this report,
Page 101 to Page 104
|
|
|
b)
|
Exhibits – see Index of Exhibits,
Page 146
|
|
|
c)
|
Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
Schedule I – Summary of Investments — Other than Investments in Related Parties,
Page 135
|
|
|
Schedule II – Condensed Financial Statements of Parent Company,
Page 137
|
|
|
Schedule III – Supplementary Insurance Information,
Page 140
|
|
|
Schedule IV – Reinsurance,
Page 142
|
|
|
Schedule V – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts,
Page 143
|
|
|
Schedule VI – Supplementary Information Concerning Property Casualty Insurance Operations,
Page 144
|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
| Summary of Investments - Other than Investments in Related Parties | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|||||||||||
|
Type of investment
|
Cost or
amortized cost
|
Fair
value
|
Balance sheet
|
|||||||||
|
Fixed maturities:
|
||||||||||||
|
United States government:
|
||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
|
$ | 0 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||
|
The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company
|
4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
4 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises:
|
||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
|
70 | 70 | 70 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Casualty Company
|
3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
|
3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company
|
125 | 124 | 124 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
201 | 200 | 200 | |||||||||
|
Foreign government:
|
||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
|
3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions:
|
||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
|
2,543 | 2,636 | 2,636 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Casualty Company
|
148 | 152 | 152 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Indemnity Company
|
36 | 38 | 38 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
|
114 | 116 | 116 | |||||||||
|
CSU Producers Resources Inc.
|
1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company
|
201 | 200 | 200 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
3,043 | 3,143 | 3,143 | |||||||||
|
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached:
|
||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
|
61 | 61 | 61 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company
|
4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
|
4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
69 | 69 | 69 | |||||||||
|
All other corporate bonds:
|
||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
|
2,353 | 2,552 | 2,552 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Casualty Company
|
53 | 58 | 58 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Indemnity Company
|
21 | 22 | 22 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
|
96 | 103 | 103 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company
|
1,830 | 1,983 | 1,983 | |||||||||
|
CSU Producers Resources Inc.
|
8 | 8 | 8 | |||||||||
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
|
207 | 237 | 237 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
4,568 | 4,963 | 4,963 | |||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
$ | 7,888 | $ | 8,383 | $ | 8,383 | ||||||
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
| Summary of Investments - Other than Investments in Related Parties | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|||||||||||
|
Type of investment
|
Cost or
amortized cost
|
Fair
value
|
Balance sheet
|
|||||||||
|
Equity securities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Common stocks:
|
||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
|
$ | 1,416 | $ | 1,977 | $ | 1,977 | ||||||
|
The Cincinnati Casualty Company
|
41 | 64 | 64 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Indemnity Company
|
11 | 13 | 13 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
|
30 | 33 | 33 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company
|
100 | 90 | 90 | |||||||||
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
|
613 | 763 | 763 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
2,211 | 2,940 | 2,940 | |||||||||
|
Nonredeemable preferred stocks:
|
||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
|
68 | 88 | 88 | |||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company
|
7 | 13 | 13 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
75 | 101 | 101 | |||||||||
|
Total equity securities
|
$ | 2,286 | $ | 3,041 | $ | 3,041 | ||||||
|
Other invested assets:
|
||||||||||||
|
Real estate:
|
||||||||||||
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
|
$ | 5 | — | $ | 5 | |||||||
|
Policy loans:
|
||||||||||||
|
The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company
|
40 | — | 40 | |||||||||
|
Limited partnerships:
|
||||||||||||
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
|
28 | — | 28 | |||||||||
|
Other investments:
|
||||||||||||
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
|
11 | — | 11 | |||||||||
|
Total other invested assets
|
$ | 84 | — | $ | 84 | |||||||
|
Total investments
|
$ | 10,258 | — | $ | 11,508 | |||||||
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation (parent company only)
|
||||||||
|
Condensed Balance Sheets
|
||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Investments
|
||||||||
|
Fixed maturities, at fair value
|
$ | 241 | $ | 261 | ||||
|
Equity securities, at fair value
|
763 | 683 | ||||||
|
Investment real estate, net
|
5 | 6 | ||||||
|
Other invested assets
|
39 | 36 | ||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
38 | 54 | ||||||
|
Equity in net assets of subsidiaries
|
4,695 | 4,441 | ||||||
|
Investment income receivable
|
5 | 5 | ||||||
|
Land, building and equipment, net, for company use (accumulated depreciation:
2010—$77; 2009—$71) |
159 | 165 | ||||||
|
Prepaid income tax
|
15 | 18 | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
15 | 14 | ||||||
|
Due from subsidiaries
|
54 | 53 | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 6,029 | $ | 5,736 | ||||
|
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
|
Dividends declared but unpaid
|
$ | 65 | $ | 64 | ||||
|
Deferred federal income tax
|
42 | 16 | ||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
790 | 790 | ||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
100 | 106 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
997 | 976 | ||||||
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Common stock
|
393 | 393 | ||||||
|
Paid-in capital
|
1,091 | 1,081 | ||||||
|
Retained earnings
|
3,980 | 3,862 | ||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
769 | 624 | ||||||
|
Treasury stock at cost
|
(1,201 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
5,032 | 4,760 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$ | 6,029 | $ | 5,736 | ||||
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation (parent company only) | ||||||||||||
| Condensed Statements of Income | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||
|
Investment income, net of expenses
|
$ | 41 | $ | 41 | $ | 67 | ||||||
|
Realized gains on investments
|
17 | 135 | 54 | |||||||||
|
Other revenue
|
14 | 15 | 14 | |||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
72 | 191 | 135 | |||||||||
|
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
52 | 52 | 51 | |||||||||
|
Other expenses
|
24 | 27 | 25 | |||||||||
|
Total expenses
|
76 | 79 | 76 | |||||||||
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES
|
(4 | ) | 112 | 59 | ||||||||
|
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
|
(7 | ) | 32 | 3 | ||||||||
|
NET INCOME BEFORE EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES
|
3 | 80 | 56 | |||||||||
|
Increase in equity of subsidiaries
|
374 | 352 | 373 | |||||||||
|
NET INCOME
|
$ | 377 | $ | 432 | $ | 429 | ||||||
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation (parent company only) | ||||||||||||
| Condensed Statements of Cash Flows | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 377 | $ | 432 | $ | 429 | ||||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
7 | 8 | 6 | |||||||||
|
Realized gains on investments
|
(17 | ) | (135 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||||
|
Dividends from subsidiaries
|
220 | 50 | 170 | |||||||||
|
Changes in:
|
||||||||||||
|
Increase in equity of subsidiaries
|
(374 | ) | (352 | ) | (373 | ) | ||||||
|
Investment income receivable
|
0 | (1 | ) | 14 | ||||||||
|
Current federal income taxes
|
3 | (104 | ) | 92 | ||||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
2 | 24 | (20 | ) | ||||||||
|
Other assets
|
0 | (2 | ) | 4 | ||||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
(12 | ) | (22 | ) | 8 | |||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
206 | (102 | ) | 276 | ||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Sale of fixed-maturities
|
32 | 22 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Call or maturity of fixed maturities
|
21 | 15 | 24 | |||||||||
|
Sale of equity securities
|
85 | 408 | 629 | |||||||||
|
Purchase of fixed maturities
|
(27 | ) | (206 | ) | 0 | |||||||
|
Purchase of equity securities
|
(92 | ) | (246 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||||
|
Change in short-term investments, net
|
0 | 65 | (64 | ) | ||||||||
|
Investment in buildings and equipment, net
|
0 | (1 | ) | (14 | ) | |||||||
|
Change in other invested assets, net
|
0 | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||||
|
Change in securities lending collateral, net
|
0 | 0 | 9 | |||||||||
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
19 | 52 | 450 | |||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in notes payable
|
0 | 0 | (20 | ) | ||||||||
|
Payment of cash dividends to shareholders
|
(252 | ) | (249 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||||
|
Purchase/issuance of treasury shares
|
(10 | ) | 1 | (138 | ) | |||||||
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
(2 | ) | 0 | 4 | ||||||||
|
Net transfers to subsidiaries
|
21 | 8 | 15 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
2 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Change in securities lending payable, net
|
0 | 0 | (9 | ) | ||||||||
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(241 | ) | (240 | ) | (398 | ) | ||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(16 | ) | (290 | ) | 328 | |||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
54 | 344 | 16 | |||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$ | 38 | $ | 54 | $ | 344 | ||||||
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary Insurance Information | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 217 | $ | 219 | $ | 229 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
84 | 78 | 77 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
9 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
310 | 303 | 312 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
178 | 178 | 197 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 488 | $ | 481 | $ | 509 | ||||||
|
Gross future policy benefits, losses, claims and expense losses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 3,728 | $ | 3,725 | $ | 3,654 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
353 | 349 | 381 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
56 | 22 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
4,137 | 4,096 | 4,040 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
2,073 | 1,817 | 1,580 | |||||||||
|
Total (1)
|
$ | 6,210 | $ | 5,913 | $ | 5,620 | ||||||
|
Gross unearned premiums:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 1,116 | $ | 1,112 | $ | 1,166 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
401 | 372 | 367 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
34 | 23 | 9 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
1,551 | 1,507 | 1,542 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
Total (1)
|
$ | 1,553 | $ | 1,509 | $ | 1,544 | ||||||
|
Other policy claims and benefits payable:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
24 | 12 | 17 | |||||||||
|
Total (1)
|
$ | 24 | $ | 12 | $ | 17 | ||||||
|
Earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 2,154 | $ | 2,199 | $ | 2,316 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
721 | 685 | 689 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
49 | 27 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
2,924 | 2,911 | 3,010 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
158 | 143 | 126 | |||||||||
|
Consolidated eliminations
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 3,082 | $ | 3,054 | $ | 3,136 | ||||||
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary Insurance Information | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Investment income, net of expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance (2)
|
348 | 336 | 350 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
129 | 122 | 119 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 477 | $ | 458 | $ | 469 | ||||||
|
Benefits, claims losses and settlement expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 1,437 | $ | 1,515 | $ | 1,504 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
537 | 551 | 547 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
41 | 20 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
2,015 | 2,086 | 2,056 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
170 | 160 | 142 | |||||||||
|
Consolidated eliminations
|
(5 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,180 | $ | 2,242 | $ | 2,193 | ||||||
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 454 | $ | 458 | $ | 462 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
148 | 143 | 145 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
14 | 10 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
616 | 611 | 610 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
37 | 27 | 22 | |||||||||
|
Total (3)
|
$ | 653 | $ | 638 | $ | 632 | ||||||
|
Other underwriting and insurance expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 250 | $ | 261 | $ | 280 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
92 | 71 | 79 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
2 | 11 | 2 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
344 | 343 | 361 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
24 | 23 | 23 | |||||||||
|
Total (3)
|
$ | 368 | $ | 366 | $ | 384 | ||||||
|
Net written premiums:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 2,155 | $ | 2,181 | $ | 2,311 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
750 | 691 | 685 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
58 | 39 | 14 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
2,963 | 2,911 | 3,010 | |||||||||
|
Accident health insurance
|
3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Consolidated eliminations
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,966 | $ | 2,914 | $ | 3,013 | ||||||
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
| Reinsurance | ||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Gross amounts:
|
||||||||||||
|
Life insurance in force
|
$ | 74,123 | $ | 69,814 | $ | 65,887 | ||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 2,281 | $ | 2,324 | $ | 2,449 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
746 | 715 | 721 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
53 | 28 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
3,080 | 3,067 | 3,175 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
211 | 196 | 180 | |||||||||
|
Consolidated eliminations
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 3,291 | $ | 3,263 | $ | 3,355 | ||||||
|
Ceded amounts to other companies:
|
||||||||||||
|
Life insurance in force
|
$ | 35,016 | $ | 34,232 | $ | 33,710 | ||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 136 | $ | 137 | $ | 144 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
26 | 31 | 34 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
4 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
166 | 169 | 178 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
53 | 53 | 54 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 219 | $ | 222 | $ | 232 | ||||||
|
Assumed amounts from other companies:
|
||||||||||||
|
Life insurance in force
|
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 9 | $ | 12 | $ | 11 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
10 | 13 | 13 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 10 | $ | 13 | $ | 13 | ||||||
|
Net amounts:
|
||||||||||||
|
Life insurance in force
|
$ | 39,108 | $ | 35,583 | $ | 32,178 | ||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 2,154 | $ | 2,199 | $ | 2,316 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
721 | 685 | 689 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
49 | 27 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
2,924 | 2,911 | 3,010 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
158 | 143 | 126 | |||||||||
|
Consolidated eliminations
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 3,082 | $ | 3,054 | $ | 3,136 | ||||||
|
Percentage of amounts assumed to net:
|
||||||||||||
|
Life insurance in force
|
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
|
Earned premiums
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
0.4 | % | 0.5 | % | 0.5 | % | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
|
Total property casualty insurance
|
0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |||||||||
|
Life insurance
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |||||||||
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
| Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
At December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Allowance for doubtful receivables:
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 3 | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | ||||||
|
Additions charged to costs and expenses
|
2 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Deductions
|
(2 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||
|
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 3 | $ | 3 | $ | 4 | ||||||
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
||||||||||||
|
Supplementary Information Concerning Property Casualty Insurance Operations
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 217 | $ | 219 | $ | 229 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
84 | 78 | 77 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
9 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 310 | $ | 303 | $ | 312 | ||||||
|
Reserves for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 3,728 | $ | 3,725 | $ | 3,654 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
353 | 349 | 381 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
56 | 22 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 4,137 | $ | 4,096 | $ | 4,040 | ||||||
|
Reserve discount deducted
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
|
Unearned premiums:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 1,116 | $ | 1,112 | $ | 1,166 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
401 | 372 | 367 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
34 | 23 | 9 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,551 | $ | 1,507 | $ | 1,542 | ||||||
|
Earned premiums:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 2,154 | $ | 2,199 | $ | 2,316 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
721 | 685 | 689 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
49 | 27 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,924 | $ | 2,911 | $ | 3,010 | ||||||
|
Investment income:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total (1)
|
$ | 348 | $ | 336 | $ | 350 | ||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses incurred related to current accident year:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 1,706 | $ | 1,662 | $ | 1,777 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
571 | 591 | 597 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
42 | 21 | 5 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,319 | $ | 2,274 | $ | 2,379 | ||||||
|
Loss and loss expenses incurred related to prior accident years:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | (269 | ) | $ | (147 | ) | $ | (273 | ) | |||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
(34 | ) | (40 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | |||||||
|
Total
|
$ | (304 | ) | $ | (188 | ) | $ | (323 | ) | |||
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 454 | $ | 458 | $ | 462 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
148 | 143 | 145 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
14 | 10 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 616 | $ | 611 | $ | 610 | ||||||
|
Paid loss and loss expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 1,330 | $ | 1,348 | $ | 1,387 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
526 | 573 | 568 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
9 | 2 | 0 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,865 | $ | 1,923 | $ | 1,955 | ||||||
|
Net written premiums:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial lines insurance
|
$ | 2,155 | $ | 2,181 | $ | 2,311 | ||||||
|
Personal lines insurance
|
750 | 691 | 685 | |||||||||
|
Excess and surplus lines insurance
|
58 | 39 | 14 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,963 | $ | 2,911 | $ | 3,010 | ||||||
|
By:
|
Eric N. Mathews, CPCU, AIAF
|
|
Title:
|
Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Assistant Treasurer
|
|
Date:
|
February
25,
2011
|
|
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
|
/S/ John J. Schiff, Jr.
|
Chairman of the Board
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
John J. Schiff, Jr.
|
||||
|
/S/ Kenneth W. Stecher
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
Kenneth W. Stecher
|
||||
|
/S/ Steven J. Johnston
|
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Secretary and
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
Steven J. Johnston
|
Treasurer | |||
|
/S/ William F. Bahl
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
William F. Bahl
|
||||
|
/S/ Gregory T. Bier
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
Gregory T. Bier
|
||||
|
/S/ Linda W. Clement-Holmes
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
Linda W. Clement-Holmes
|
||||
|
/S/ Kenneth C. Lichtendahl
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
Kenneth C. Lichtendahl
|
||||
|
/S/ W. Rodney McMullen
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
W. Rodney McMullen
|
||||
|
/S/ Gretchen W. Price
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
Gretchen W. Price
|
||||
|
/S/ Thomas R. Schiff
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
Thomas R. Schiff
|
||||
|
/S/ Douglas S. Skidmore
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
Douglas S. Skidmore
|
||||
|
/S/ John F. Steele, Jr.
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
John F. Steele, Jr.
|
||||
|
/S/ Larry R. Webb
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
Larry R. Webb
|
||||
|
/S/ E. Anthony Woods
|
Director
|
February 25, 2011
|
||
|
E. Anthony Woods
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Cincinnati Financial Corporation
|
|
|
3.2
|
Regulations of Cincinnati Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to the company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Exhibit 3.2) (File No. 000-04604)
|
|
|
4.1
|
Indenture with The Bank of New York Trust Company (incorporated by reference to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 2, 2004, filed with respect to the issuance of the company’s 6.125% Senior Notes due November 1, 2034)
|
|
|
4.2
|
Supplemental Indenture with The Bank of New York Trust Company (incorporated by reference to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 2, 2004, filed with respect to the issuance of the company’s 6.125% Senior Notes due November 1, 2034)
|
|
|
4.3
|
Second Supplemental Indenture with The Bank of New York Trust Company (incorporated by reference to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2005, filed with respect to the completion of the company’s exchange offer and rescission offer for its 6.90% senior debentures due 2028)
|
|
|
4.4
|
Form of 6.125% Exchange Note Due 2034 (included in Exhibit 4.2)
|
|
|
4.5
|
Form of 6.92% Debentures Due 2028 (included in Exhibit 4.3)
|
|
|
4.6
|
Indenture with the First National Bank of Chicago (subsequently assigned to The Bank of New York Trust Company) (incorporated by reference to the company’s registration statement on Form S-3 effective May 22, 1998 (File No. 333-51677))
|
|
|
4.7
|
Form of 6.90% Debentures Due 2028 (included in Exhibit 4.6)
|
|
|
10.1
|
Agreement with Messer Construction (incorporated by reference to the company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 11, 2005)
|
|
|
10.2
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Directors’ Stock Plan of 2009 (incorporated by reference to the company’s definitive Proxy Statement dated March 20, 2009)
|
|
|
10.3
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan No. VI (incorporated by reference to the company’s definitive Proxy Statement dated March 1, 1999) (File No. 000-04604)
|
|
|
10.4
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan No. VII (incorporated by reference to the company’s definitive Proxy Statement dated March 8, 2002) (File No. 000-04604)
|
|
|
10.5
|
Form of Nonqualified and Incentive Option Agreements for Stock Option Plan No. VI (incorporated by reference to the company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 11, 2005)
|
|
|
10.6
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Annual Incentive Compensation Plan of 2009 (incorporated by reference to the company’s definitive Proxy Statement dated March 20, 2009)
|
|
|
10.7
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the company’s definitive Proxy Statement dated March 30, 2007)
|
|
|
10.8
|
Form of Combined Incentive/Nonqualified Stock Option for Stock Option Plan VI (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 15, 2005)
|
|
|
10.9
|
Director and Named Executive Officer Compensation Summary (incorporated by reference to the company’s definitive Proxy Statement dated March 18, 2010)
|
|
|
10.10
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 filed with the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006)
|
|
|
10.11
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for Stock Option Plan VII (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2006)
|
|
|
10.12
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Stock Option Plan VII (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2006)
|
|
|
10.13
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for the 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2006)
|
|
|
10.14
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2006)
|
|
|
10.15
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for John J. Schiff, Jr., dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007)
|
|
|
10.16
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for James E. Benoski, dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007)
|
|
|
10.17
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Jacob F. Scherer, Jr., dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007)
|
|
|
10.18
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Kenneth W. Stecher, dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007)
|
|
|
10.19
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Thomas A. Joseph, dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007)
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
10.20
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (service-based) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007, as amended)
|
|
|
10.21
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for use under the Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (performance-based) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2008)
|
|
|
10.22
|
Form of Incentive Compensation Agreement for the Cincinnati Financial Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan of 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 16, 2009)
|
|
|
10.23
|
Stock Purchase Agreement between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and the E. Perry Webb Marital Trust, dated September 5, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 filed with the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007)
|
|
|
10.24
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for John J. Schiff, Jr. dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008)
|
|
|
10.25
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for James E. Benoski dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008)
|
|
|
10.26
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Jacob F. Scherer, Jr. dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008)
|
|
|
10.27
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Kenneth W. Stecher dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008)
|
|
|
10.28
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Thomas A. Joseph dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with the company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008)
|
|
|
10.29
|
Unwritten arrangement with Lehman Brothers Inc. to sell 35,000,000 shares of Fifth Third stock held by the Cincinnati Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to the further description of the arrangement set forth on the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 25, 2008)
|
|
|
10.30
|
Amended and Restated Cincinnati Financial Corporation Top Hat Savings Plan dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 filed with the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
10.31
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for John J. Schiff, Jr. dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2008)
|
|
|
10.32
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for James E. Benoski dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2008)
|
|
|
10.33
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Kenneth W. Stecher dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2008)
|
|
|
10.34
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Steven J. Johnston dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2008)
|
|
|
10.35
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Thomas A. Joseph dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2008)
|
|
|
10.36
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for J.F. Scherer dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2008)
|
|
|
10.37
|
Incentive Compensation Award Agreement for Kenneth W. Stecher dated March 16, 2009 under Incentive Compensation Plan of 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 16, 2009)
|
|
|
10.38
|
Incentive Compensation Award Agreement for Steven J. Johnston dated March 16, 2009 under Incentive Compensation Plan of 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 16, 2009)
|
|
|
10.39
|
Credit Agreement by and among Cincinnati Financial Corporation, CFC Investment Company, and PNC Bank, National Association, dated August 27, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 27, 2010) (which supersedes that certain Offer and Acceptance of terms to renew $75 million unsecured line of credit with PNC Bank, National Association, effective June 30, 2009, that was filed with and described in the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 7, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).
|
|
|
10.40
|
Swap Agreement by and among Cincinnati Financial Corporation, CFC Investment Company and PNC Bank, National Association, dated August 31, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).
|
|
|
10.41
|
Letter Agreement by and among Cincinnati Financial Corporation , CFC Investment Company and PNC Bank, National Association, dated August 27, 2010 renewing $75 Million committed line of credit pursuant to the Credit Agreement referenced in Exhibit 10.39 above (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 27, 2010)
|
|
|
11
|
Statement re: Computation of per share earnings for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 contained in Part II, Item 8, Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
14
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (incorporated by reference to the company’s Definitive Proxy Statement data March 18, 2004 (File No. 000-04604))
|
|
|
21
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation subsidiaries contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report
|
|
|
23
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
31A
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 – Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
31B
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 – Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
32
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
|
No information found
* THE VALUE IS THE MARKET VALUE AS OF THE LAST DAY OF THE QUARTER FOR WHICH THE 13F WAS FILED.
| FUND | NUMBER OF SHARES | VALUE ($) | PUT OR CALL |
|---|
| DIRECTORS | AGE | BIO | OTHER DIRECTOR MEMBERSHIPS |
|---|
No information found
No Customers Found
Suppliers
Price
Yield
| Owner | Position | Direct Shares | Indirect Shares |
|---|