CIZN 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2010

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

OR

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-15375

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

601-656-4692

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes þ No

Number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of August 6, 2010:

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

SECOND QUARTER 2010 INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). However, these financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited and reflect all adjustments and reclassifications, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial condition as of and for the interim periods presented. All adjustments and reclassifications are of a normal and recurring nature. Results for the period ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim periods or for the year as a whole.

The interim consolidated financial statements of Citizens Holding Company include the accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Citizens Bank of Philadelphia (the “Bank” and collectively with Citizens Holding Company, the “Corporation”). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

For further information and significant accounting policies of the Corporation, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Citizens Holding Company included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2010.

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into commitments to extend credit to its customers. The unused portion of these commitments is not reflected in the accompanying financial statements. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had entered into loan commitments with certain customers with an aggregate unused balance of $45,331,357 compared to an aggregate unused balance of $35,605,204 at December 31, 2009. There were $3,175,209 of letters of credit outstanding at June 30, 2010 and $8,592,050 at December 31, 2009. The fair value of such contracts is not considered material because letters of credit and loan commitments often are not used in their entirety, if at all, before they expire. The balances of such letters and commitments should not be used to project actual future liquidity requirements. However, the Corporation does incorporate expectations about the level of draws under its credit-related commitments into its asset and liability management program.

The Corporation is a party to lawsuits and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, all of which are being vigorously contested. In the regular course of business, management evaluates estimated losses or costs related to litigation, and provisions are made for anticipated losses whenever management believes that such losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. At the present time, management believes, based on the advice of legal

5

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

counsel, that the final resolution of pending legal proceedings will not have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Net income per share - basic has been computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. Net income per share - diluted has been computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method. Earnings per share was computed as follows:

At June 30, 2010, the Corporation had one stock-based compensation plan, which is the 1999 Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan (the “Directors’ Plan). Prior to its expiration, the Corporation also had the 1999 Employees’ Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the Employees Plan. The Corporation accounts for these plans under the stock compensation topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). This topic provides guidance related to share-based payment transactions, including valuation methods (including assumptions such as expected volatility and expected term), the classification of compensation expense, non-GAAP financial measures, first time adoption in an interim period and disclosure in Management’s Discussion and Analysis subsequent to adoption.

To determine the expected term of the options granted, the Corporation chose to use the “simplified” method for “plain vanilla” options as detailed in the stock compensation topic of the ASC for those options granted prior to December 31, 2007. Beginning with options granted after that date, the Corporation uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Volatility is determined by using the standard deviation of the differences of the closing stock price of the Corporation’s common stock as quoted on the American Stock Exchange (through November 15, 2006, the date of the transfer of the listing of the Corporation’s common stock to The NASDAQ Global Market) or The NASDAQ Global Market (since November 16, 2006) on or about the 15 ^th of each month starting January 15, 2002. Stock prices prior to that date experienced volatility that is not representative of the volatility experienced since that time and therefore are not used in this calculation.

6

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

Although the option grants are not subject to an explicit vesting schedule, the Corporation recognizes that the restriction on exercising options lapse six months and one day after the grant date, which constitutes a de facto vesting schedule, and must be considered. The stock compensation topic of the ASC states that a requisite service period may be explicit, implicit or derived and that an implicit service period is one that may be inferred from an analysis of the award’s terms. Based on an analysis of the terms of the option awards, management concluded that the restriction on exercising options until six months and one day have passed since the date of grant constitutes a service period and the compensation costs should be amortized over that six month period.

On April 28, 2010, the members of the Board of Directors were granted a total of 13,500 options as specified in the Directors’ Plan. These options were granted at an exercise price of $25.72 per option, which was the closing price of Citizens Holding Company stock on that day. These options are first exercisable on October 29, 2010 and must be exercised no later than April 28, 2020. No options were granted to officers during 2010.

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of the options granted to the directors in the second quarter of 2010.

Using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the foregoing assumptions, it was determined that the cost of options granted under the Directors’ Plan in April 2010 was $150,748 and should be recognized as an expense of $25,124 per month over the six month requisite service period, beginning in April 2010. This was recorded as salary expense with a credit to paid-in capital. A deferred tax on these options was recorded in the aggregate amount of $51,254, or $8,542 per month, over the six month requisite service period, beginning in April 2010.

On April 29, 2009, the members of the Board of Directors were granted a total of 13,500 options as specified in the Directors’ Plan. These options were granted at an exercise price of $21.75 per option, which was the closing price of Citizens Holding Company stock on that day. These options were first exercisable on October 30, 2009 and must be exercised no later than April 29, 2019. No options were granted to officers during 2009.

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of the options granted to the directors in the second quarter of 2009.

7

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

Using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the foregoing assumptions, it was determined that the cost of options granted under the Directors’ Plan in April 2009 was $134,952 and should be recognized as an expense of $22,492 per month over the six month requisite service period, beginning in April 2009. This was recorded as salary expense with a credit to paid-in capital. A deferred tax on these options was recorded in the aggregate amount of $49,932, or $8,322 per month, over the six month requisite service period, beginning in April 2009.

The following table below is a summary of the stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

The intrinsic value of options granted under the Directors’ Plan at June 30, 2010 was $46,200 and the intrinsic value of options granted under the Employees’ Plan at June 30, 2010 was $104,675 for a total intrinsic value at June 30, 2010 of $150,875.

The income tax topic of the ASC defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. This topic also provides guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties, and includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had no unrecognized tax benefits related to federal and state income tax matters. Therefore, the Corporation does not anticipate any material increase or decrease in the effective tax rate during 2010 relative to any tax positions taken. It is the Corporation’s policy to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

The Corporation and its subsidiaries file a consolidated United States federal income tax return.

8

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

The Corporation is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ending December 31, 2006 through 2009. The Corporation and its subsidiaries’ state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ended December 31, 2006 through 2009.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FAS FSP No. 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (“FSP 132-1”), codified in the Compensation-Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC. FSP 132-1 requires further disclosures about the fair value measurements of an employer’s benefit plan assets, including disclosures about the following: how investment allocation decisions are made, including the factors material to an understanding of investment policies and strategies; major categories of plan assets; information about inputs and valuation techniques, including the fair value hierarchy classifications, as defined by Fair Value Topic of the ASC, of the major categories of plan assets; the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs) on changes in plan assets; and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. FSP 132-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The Corporation is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting FSP 132-1 on its financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an Amendment of FAS 140 , (“SFAS 166”), codified in the Transfers and Servicing Topic of the ASC . The objective of this standard is to provide implementation guidance on accounting for a transfer of a financial asset and repurchase financing. The amendment presumes that an initial transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing are considered part of the same arrangement (linked transaction) under SFAS 166. However, if certain criteria are met, the initial transfer and repurchase financing shall not be evaluated as a linked transaction and shall not be evaluated under SFAS 166. SFAS 166 was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 and its adoption did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , (Topic 820): Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (“ASU 2009-05”) which provides additional guidance on the measurement of liabilities at fair value. Specifically, when a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, ASU 2009-05 requires that the fair value of a liability be measured using one or more of the valuation techniques that should maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. In addition, an entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of a liability. The Corporation adopted ASU 2009-05 effective October 1, 2009 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures , (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”) which requires the addition of new disclosures and clarifies existing disclosure requirements already included in the guidance for fair value measurements. The new disclosures related to significant

9

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers, as well as the clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The new disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. ASU 2010-06 clarifies and increases the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and will not have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial position, results of operations or stockholders’ equity.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosure about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses . This ASU requires additional disclosures that facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of the nature of credit risk inherent in the entity’s portfolio of financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses and the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. The ASU makes changes to existing disclosure requirements and includes additional disclosure requirements about financing receivables, including credit quality indicators of financing receivables at the end of the reporting period by class of financing receivables, the aging of past due financing receivables at the end of the reporting period by class of financing receivables, and the nature and extent of troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the period by class of financing receivables and their effect on the allowance for credit losses. These disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. We do not expect ASU 2010-20 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements other than the new disclosures required by the ASU.

The Financial Instruments Topic of the ASC requires disclosure of financial instruments’ fair values, as well as the methodology and significant assumptions used in estimating fair values. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. The Financial Instruments Topic of the ASC excludes certain financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation and may not be indicative of amounts that might ultimately be realized upon disposition or settlement of those assets and liabilities.

The Fair Value Topic of the ASC establishes a framework for measuring fair value and required enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. This topic clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. This topic also requires disclosure about how fair value was determined for assets and liabilities and established a hierarchy for which these

10

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

assets and liabilities must be grouped, based on significant levels of inputs as follows:

The determination of where assets and liabilities fall within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value estimates, methods and assumptions used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments were:

Cash and Due from Banks and Interest Bearing Deposits with Banks

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for these instruments approximate fair value because of their immediate and shorter-term maturities.

Securities Available-for-Sale

Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices, when available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments. When neither quoted prices nor comparable instruments are available, unobservable inputs are needed to form an expected future cash flow analysis to establish fair values. Level 2 securities include debt securities including obligations of United States government agencies and corporations, mortgage-backed securities and state, county and municipal bonds. Level 3 securities consist of a pooled trust preferred security.

The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010:

The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009:

11

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

The following table reports the activity for 2010 in assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs.

As of June 30, 2010, management determined, based on the current credit ratings, known defaults and deferrals by the underlying banks and the degree to which future defaults and deferrals would be required to occur before the cash flow for the Corporation’s tranche is negatively impacted, that no other than temporary impairment exists.

The Corporation recorded no gains or losses in earnings for the period that were attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date.

Net Loans

For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for other loans (i.e., commercial real estate and rental property mortgage loans, commercial and industrial loans, financial institution loans,

12

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

and agricultural loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Impaired Loans

Loans considered impaired as defined in the Receivables topic of the ASC, are reserved for at the time the loan is identified as impaired taking into account the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets including but not limited to, equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. The fair value of real estate is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. The fair value of the business assets is generally based on amounts reported on the business’s financial statements. Appraised and reported values may be adjusted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation and management’s knowledge of the client and the client’s business. Since not all valuation inputs are observable, these nonrecurring fair value determinations are classified Level 3. Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly, based on the same factors previously identified.

Other real estate owned

Other real estate owned (“OREO”) is comprised of commercial and residential real estate obtained in partial and total satisfaction of loan obligations. OREO acquired in settlement of indebtedness is recorded at fair value of the real estate, less costs to sell. Subsequently, it may be necessary to record nonrecurring fair value adjustments for decline in fair value. Fair value, when recorded, is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers and adjusted for management’s estimates of costs to sell. As such, values for OREO are classified as Level 3.

For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during 2010 that were still held in the balance sheet at June 30, 2010, the following table provides the hierarchy level and the fair value of the related assets:

For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during 2009 that were still held in the balance sheet at December 31, 2009, the following table provides the hierarchy level and the fair value of the related assets:

13

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

Impaired loans with a carrying value of $12,414,843 had an allocated allowance for loan losses of $1,477,863 at June 30, 2010. The allocated allowance is based on the carrying value of the impaired loan and the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated costs to sell.

The following table reports the activity for 2010 in impaired assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs.

After monitoring the carrying amounts for subsequent declines or impairment after foreclosure, management determined that an impairment charge for four parcels of OREO in the total amount of $1,016,854 was necessary and was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009. Prior to an auction of OREO on April15, 2010, the Corporation evaluated the properties scheduled for sale and took an impairment charge on those properties in the amount of $432,880.

14

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

Federal Funds Sold and Purchased; Commercial Repurchase Agreements; Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable

Due to the short term nature of these instruments, the carrying amount is equal to the fair value.

Deposits

The fair values for demand deposits, NOW and money market accounts and savings accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts for variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and time deposits approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings

The fair value of FHLB advances is based on discounted cash flow analysis.

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments

The fair value of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit are estimated using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. The fees associated with these financial instruments are not material.

The following represents the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

15

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

The Corporation has evaluated all subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure through the date of issuance of the financial statements.

16

Table of Contents

CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

In addition to historical information, this report contains statements which constitute forward-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are based on management’s beliefs, plans, expectations and assumptions and on information currently available to management. The words “may,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “continue,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” and similar expressions used in this report that do not relate to historical facts are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements appear in a number of places in this report, including, but not limited to, statements found in Item 1, “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and in Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The Corporation notes that a variety of factors could cause the actual results or experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations described or implied by such forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operation, performance, development and results of the Corporation’s business include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the risk of adverse changes in business conditions in the banking industry generally and in the specific markets in which the Corporation operates; (b) changes in the legislative and regulatory environment that negatively impact the Corporation through increased operating expenses; (c) increased competition from other financial institutions; (d) the impact of technological advances; (e) expectations about the movement of interest rates, including actions that may be taken by the Federal Reserve Board in response to changing economic conditions; (f) changes in asset quality and loan demand; (g) expectations about overall economic strength and the performance of the economies in the Corporation’s market area and (h) other risks detailed from time to time in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Corporation does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements subsequent to the date on which they are made.

17

Table of Contents

Management’s discussion and analysis is intended to provide greater insight into the results of operations and the financial condition of Citizens Holding Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Citizens Bank of Philadelphia (the “Bank,” and collectively with Citizens Holding Company, the “Corporation”). The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report.

LIQUIDITY

The Corporation has an asset and liability management program that assists management in maintaining net interest margins during times of both rising and falling interest rates and in maintaining sufficient liquidity. A measurement of liquidity is the ratio of net deposits and short-term liabilities divided by the sum of net cash, short-term investments and marketable assets. This measurement for liquidity of the Corporation at June 30, 2010 was 34.59% and at December 31, 2009 was 36.93%. Management believes it maintains adequate liquidity for the Corporation’s current needs.

The Corporation’s primary source of liquidity is customer deposits, which were $549,593,836 at June 30, 2010 and $569,802,585 at December 31, 2009. Other sources of liquidity include investment securities, the Corporation’s line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and federal funds lines with correspondent banks. The Corporation had $300,280,855 invested in investment securities at June 30, 2010 and $318,403,999 at December 31, 2009. The Corporation had secured and unsecured federal funds lines with correspondent banks in the amount of $46,400,000 at June 30, 2010 and $40,500,000 at December 31, 2009. In addition, the Corporation has the ability to draw on its line of credit with the FHLB. At June 30, 2010, the Corporation had unused and available $102,304,294 of its line of credit with the FHLB and at December 31, 2009, the Corporation had unused and available $154,754,830 of its line of credit with the FHLB. The decrease in the amount available under the Corporation’s line of credit with the FHLB from the end of 2009 to June 30, 2010 was the result of a decrease in collateral available, as calculated quarterly by the FHLB, and the issuance of a $12 million advance.

At June 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009 the Corporation had no funds in federal funds sold. The Corporation usually invests its excess liquidity in federal funds sold on a daily basis but during these two periods left its excess funds on deposit at the Federal Reserve Bank. This placement was due to the Federal Reserve Bank paying a rate on deposits that was higher than the current Federal Funds Rate offered by commercial banks.

When the Corporation has more funds than it needs for its reserve requirements or short-term liquidity needs, the Corporation increases its investment portfolio, increases the balances in interest bearing due from accounts or sells federal funds. It is management’s policy to maintain an adequate portion of its portfolio of assets and liabilities on a short-term basis to insure rate flexibility and to meet loan funding and liquidity needs. When deposits decline or do not grow sufficiently to fund loan demand, management will seek funding either through federal funds purchased or advances from the FHLB.

18

Table of Contents

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Corporation’s equity capital was $78,660,348 at June 30, 2010 as compared to $74,597,464 at December 31, 2009. The main reason for the increase in equity capital was net earnings in excess of dividends paid. Equity capital was also positively impacted by the investment securities market value adjustment due to an increase in the market value of the Corporation’s investment portfolio. This market value increase was due to general market conditions, specifically the decrease in short term interest rates, which caused an increase in the market price of the investment portfolio.

Certain employees and directors exercised stock options for 37,150 shares of stock in 2009. These option exercises brought the number of shares outstanding to 4,838,187 at December 31, 2009. In the first six months of 2010, four directors and eight officers exercised stock options for 16,350 shares of stock.

Commencing May 1, 2008 the Corporation implemented a stock repurchase program under which the Corporation could repurchase up to 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market. At the end of the program, April 30, 2009, the Corporation had purchased 47,284 shares at an average price of $21.17.

Commencing May 1, 2009 the Corporation renewed its stock repurchase program whereby the Corporation may purchase up to 250,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock on the open market. This plan terminated April 30, 2010 and the Corporation had purchased 49,326 shares at an average price of $22.75. This reduced the number of shares outstanding at June 30, 2010 to 4,838,411.

Cash dividends in the amount of $2,030,274, or $0.42 per share, have been paid in 2010 as of the end of the second quarter.

Quantitative measures established by federal regulations to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier 1 capital (primarily common stock and retained earnings, less goodwill) to risk weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes that as of June 30, 2010, the Corporation meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

19

Table of Contents

20

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, certain items in the consolidated statements of income of the Corporation and the related changes between those periods:

See Note 3 to the Corporation’s Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation regarding the Corporation’s calculation of Net Income Per Share - basic and - diluted.

Annualized return on average equity (“ROE”) was 8.67% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 10.02% for the corresponding period in 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, ROE was 9.50% compared to 10.12% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. In both instances, the decrease in ROE was caused by the decrease in net income for the three and six months of 2010 while average equity increased.

The book value per share increased to $16.26 at June 30, 2010 compared to $15.42 at December 31, 2009. The increase in book value per share reflects the increase in equity due to the amount of earnings in excess of dividends and the increase in other comprehensive income due to the increase in market value of the Corporation’s investment securities. Average assets for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $837,591,717 compared to $806,213,076 for the year ended December 31, 2009.

21

Table of Contents

NET INTEREST INCOME / NET INTEREST MARGIN

One component of the Corporation’s earnings is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest and fees earned on loans and investments and the interest paid for deposits and borrowed funds. The net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets.

The annualized net interest margin was 3.97% for the second quarter of 2010 compared to 4.16% for the corresponding period of 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 annualized net interest margin was 4.08% compared to 4.14% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in net interest margin from 2009 to 2010 is the result of a larger decrease in yields on earning assets compared to the decrease in rates paid on deposits and borrowed funds, as detailed below. Earning assets averaged $758,474,110 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This represents an increase of $22,871,456, or 3.1%, over average earning assets of $735,602,654 for the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Earning assets averaged $761,247,152 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This represents an increase of $46,841,984, or 6.6% over average earning assets of $714,405,168 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in earning assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 is the result of the normal growth pattern of the Corporation and not due to any special investments or acquisitions.

Interest bearing deposits averaged $468,130,961 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This represents a decrease of $20,686,983, or 4.2%, over the average of interest bearing deposits of $488,817,944 for the three month period ended June 30, 2009. This was due to a decrease in interest bearing deposits and in certificates of deposit outstanding. Other borrowed funds averaged $191,810,773 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This represents an increase of $34,896,084, or 22.2%, over the other borrowed funds of $156,914,689 for the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Interest bearing deposits averaged $470,419,857 for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. This represents a decrease of $5,878,576, or 1.2% over the average of interest bearing deposits of $476,298,433 for the six month period ended June 30, 2009. This was due to a decrease in each category of deposits outstanding. Other borrowed funds averaged $193,970,665 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This represents an increase of $45,608,485, or 30.7% over the other borrowed funds of $148,362,180 for the six month period ended June 30, 2009. This increase in other borrowed funds was due to a $39,380,913 increase in the Commercial Repo Liability, a $247,013 decrease in the ABE Loan Liability, a $1,193,923 decrease in Federal Funds Purchased and an increase in the Federal Home Loan Bank advances of $7,668,509 for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2009.

Net interest income was $7,211,268 for the three month period ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $180,040 from $7,391,308 for the three month period ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to changes in both volume and rate. The changes in volume in earning assets and in deposits and in borrowed funds are discussed above. As to changes in rate, in the three month period ended June 30, 2010, the rates paid on deposits and borrowed funds decreased faster than the yield on earning assets as compared to the changes in rates and yields in the same period in 2009. The yield on all interest bearing assets decreased 42 basis points to 5.15% in the second quarter of 2010 from 5.57% for the same period in 2009. At the same time, the rate paid on all interest

22

Table of Contents

bearing liabilities for the second quarter of 2010 decreased by 63 basis points to 1.38% from 2.01% in the same period of 2009. Net interest income was $14,776,573 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $634,434 from the $14,142,139 for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to changes in both rate and volume. The changes in volume in earning assets and in deposits and in borrowed funds are discussed above. As to changes in rate, in the six month period ended June 30, 2010, the rates paid on deposits and borrowed funds decreased less than the yield on earning assets as compared to the changes in rates and yields in the same period of 2009. The yield on all interest bearing assets decreased 57 basis points to 5.28% in the first six months of 2010 from 5.85% for the same period in 2009. At the same time, the rate paid on all interest bearing liabilities for the first six months of 2010 decreased 59 basis points to 1.38% from 1.97% in the same period in 2009. As longer term interest bearing assets and liabilities mature and reprice, management believes that the yields on interest bearing assets and rates on interest bearing liabilities will both decrease.

The following table shows the interest and fees and corresponding yields for loans only.

The decrease in interest rates in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 reflects the decrease in all loan interest rates for both new and refinanced loans in the period.

CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE

As a natural corollary to the Corporation’s lending activities, some loan losses are to be expected. The risk of loss varies with the type of loan being made and the overall creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan. The degree of perceived risk is taken into account in establishing the structure of, and interest rates and security for, specific loans and for various types of loans. The Corporation attempts to minimize its credit risk exposure by use of thorough loan application and approval procedures.

The Corporation maintains a program of systematic review of its existing loans. Loans are graded for their overall quality. Those loans, which the Corporation’s management determines require further monitoring and supervision, are segregated and reviewed on a regular basis. Significant problem loans are reviewed on a monthly basis by the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

The Corporation charges off that portion of any loan that management has determined to be a loss. A loan is generally considered by management to represent a loss in whole or in part when exposure beyond the collateral value is apparent, servicing of the unsecured portion has been discontinued or collection is not anticipated based on the borrower’s financial condition. The general economic conditions in the borrower’s industry influence this determination. The principal

23

Table of Contents

amount of any loan which is declared a loss is charged against the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses.

The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses is designed to provide for loan losses that can be reasonably anticipated. The allowance for loan losses is established through charges to operating expenses in the form of provisions for loan losses. Actual loan losses or recoveries are charged or credited to the allowance for loan losses. Management of the Corporation determines the amount of the allowance. Among the factors considered in determining the allowance for loan losses are the current financial condition of the Corporation’s borrowers and the value of security, if any, for their loans. Estimates of future economic conditions and their impact on various industries and individual borrowers are also taken into consideration, as are the Corporation’s historical loan loss experience and reports of banking regulatory authorities. As these estimates, factors and evaluations are primarily judgmental, no assurance can be given as to whether the Corporation will sustain loan losses in excess or below its allowance or that subsequent evaluation of the loan portfolio may not require material increases or decreases in such allowance.

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses for the dates indicated:

The provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $695,255, a decrease of $129,078 from the $824,333 provision for the same period in 2009. The provision for loan losses was $1,320,211 for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to a provision of $1,140,345 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in our loan loss provisions for the three month period and the increase in the six month period is a result of changes in outstanding loans, loan losses recorded for the respective periods and management’s assessment of inherent loss in the loan portfolio, including the impact caused by current local and national economic conditions. The Corporation’s model used to calculate the provision is based on the percentage of historical charge-offs applied to the current loan balances by loan segment and specific reserves applied to certain impaired loans. Nonaccrual loans increased during this period due to the condition of the local and national economies.

24

Table of Contents

For the three months ended June 30, 2010, net loan losses charged to the allowance for loan losses totaled $407,700, an increase of $116,144 from the $291,556 charged off in the same period in 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net loan losses charged to the allowance for loan losses totaled $832,041, an increase of $90,644 over the $741,397 charged off in the same period in 2009. These increases were due to an increase number of charge offs and not the result of one particular borrower.

Management reviews with the Board of Directors the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. The loan loss provision is adjusted when specific items reflect a need for such an adjustment. Management believes that there were no material loan losses during the first six months of 2010 that have not been charged off. Management also believes that the Corporation’s allowance will be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the Corporation’s loan portfolio. However, in light of overall economic conditions in the Corporation’s geographic area and the nation as a whole, it is possible that additional provisions for loan loss may be required.

NON-INTEREST INCOME

Non-interest income includes service charges on deposit accounts, wire transfer fees, safe deposit box rentals and other revenue not derived from interest on earning assets. Non-interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $1,765,691, a decrease of $113,734, or 6.1%, over the same period in 2009. Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $7,117, or 0.7%, to $1,020,995 in the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $1,013,878 for the same period in 2009. Other service charges and fees increased by $26,817, or 7.8%, in the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The difference in fee income was the result of fluctuations in volume and not a direct result of fee changes.

Non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $3,388,823, a decrease of $52,318, or 1.5%, compared to $3,441,141 for the same period in 2009. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $57,006, or 3.0%, to $1,985,773 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Other service charges and fees increased $77,212, or 11.5%, in the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The difference in fee volume was the result of an increase in volume and not a direct result of fee changes.

The following is a detail of the other major income classifications that are included in Other Income under Non-Interest Income on the income statement:

25

Table of Contents