CMTL 10-Q Quarterly Report Jan. 31, 2013

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP /DE/

10-Ks and 10-Qs

10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2024
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2023
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2022
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2021
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2020
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2019
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2018
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2017
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2016
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2015
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2014
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2013
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2012
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 31, 2011
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Nov. 2, 2010
10-K	Fiscal year ended July 31, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended April 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2010

PROXIES

DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 27, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on July 31, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 16, 2023
DEF 14A	Filed on July 31, 2023
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 18, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on July 31, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 18, 2020
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 15, 2019
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 16, 2018
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 16, 2017
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 21, 2016
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 23, 2015
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 26, 2014
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 7, 2013
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 20, 2012
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 23, 2011
DEF 14A	Filed on Nov. 8, 2010

10-Q 1 cmtl131201310q.htm CURRENT REPORT CMTL 1.31.2013 10Q

Index

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2013



	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number: 0-7928

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		11-2139466
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation /organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

68 South Service Road, Suite 230, Melville, NY		11747
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(631) 962-7000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer		Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer		Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

As of March 4, 2013 , the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.10 per share, of the registrant was 16,821,079 shares.

Index



COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. INDEX
			Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	2

		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - January 31, 2013 (Unaudited) and July 31, 2012	2

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three and Six Months Ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)	3

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - Six Months Ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)	4

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six Months Ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)	5

		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7

	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	50

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	51

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	52

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	52

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	52

	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	52

	Item 6.	Exhibits	53

		Signature Page	54

Index

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



	January 31, 2013			July 31, 2012
Assets	(Unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	352,927,000		367,894,000
Accounts receivable, net	42,236,000			56,242,000
Inventories, net	70,156,000			72,361,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	11,541,000			8,196,000
Deferred tax asset, net	10,877,000			12,183,000
Total current assets	487,737,000			516,876,000

Property, plant and equipment, net	21,238,000			22,832,000
Goodwill	137,354,000			137,354,000
Intangibles with finite lives, net	35,669,000			38,833,000
Deferred tax asset, net, non-current	—			438,000
Deferred financing costs, net	1,806,000			2,487,000
Other assets, net	943,000			958,000
Total assets	$	684,747,000		719,778,000
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	14,068,000		20,967,000
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	30,818,000			40,870,000
Dividends payable	—			4,773,000
Customer advances and deposits	10,530,000			14,516,000
Interest payable	1,529,000			1,529,000
Total current liabilities	56,945,000			82,655,000

Convertible senior notes	200,000,000			200,000,000
Other liabilities	3,811,000			5,098,000
Income taxes payable	3,074,000			2,624,000
Deferred tax liability, net	2,240,000			—
Total liabilities	266,070,000			290,377,000
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 20)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.10 per share; shares authorized and unissued 2,000,000	—			—
Common stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued 28,978,701 shares and 28,931,679 shares at January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012, respectively	2,898,000			2,893,000
Additional paid-in capital	360,968,000			361,458,000
Retained earnings	404,465,000			404,227,000
	768,331,000			768,578,000
Less:
Treasury stock, at cost (11,961,857 shares and 11,564,059 shares at January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012, respectively)	(349,654,000		)	(339,177,000	)
Total stockholders’ equity	418,677,000			429,401,000
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	684,747,000		719,778,000

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)



	Three months ended January 31,					Six months ended January 31,
	2013			2012		2013		2012
Net sales	$	74,577,000		99,141,000		165,530,000		212,502,000
Cost of sales	42,337,000			57,725,000		91,487,000		119,806,000
Gross profit	32,240,000			41,416,000		74,043,000		92,696,000

Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	15,433,000			19,626,000		32,243,000		43,744,000
Research and development	9,278,000			9,444,000		19,327,000		19,128,000
Amortization of intangibles	1,582,000			1,692,000		3,164,000		3,411,000
	26,293,000			30,762,000		54,734,000		66,283,000

Operating income	5,947,000			10,654,000		19,309,000		26,413,000

Other expenses (income):
Interest expense	2,030,000			2,183,000		4,141,000		4,329,000
Interest income and other	(315,000		)	(434,000	)	(591,000	)	(930,000	)

Income before provision for income taxes	4,232,000			8,905,000		15,759,000		23,014,000
Provision for income taxes	1,867,000			3,084,000		5,959,000		4,592,000

Net income	$	2,365,000		5,821,000		9,800,000		18,422,000
Net income per share (See Note 6):
Basic	$	0.14		0.29		0.57		0.85
Diluted	$	0.14		0.27		0.51		0.75

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic	17,300,000			20,087,000		17,340,000		21,672,000

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding – diluted	17,401,000			26,056,000		23,394,000		27,588,000

Dividends declared per issued and outstanding common share as of the applicable dividend record date	$	0.275		0.275		0.55		0.55

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2013 AND 2012

(Unaudited)



	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock				Stockholders' Equity
	Shares	Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Shares	Amount			Stockholders' Equity
Balance as of July 31, 2011	28,731,265	$	2,873,000	$	355,001,000		$	393,109,000		4,508,445	$	(121,803,000	)	$	629,180,000

Equity-classified stock award compensation	—	—		1,834,000			—			—	—			1,834,000
Proceeds from exercise of options	114,160	12,000		2,575,000			—			—	—			2,587,000
Proceeds from issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares	23,664	2,000		554,000			—			—	—			556,000
Cash dividends declared	—	—		—			(11,454,000		)	—	—			(11,454,000		)
Net income tax shortfall from stock-based award exercises	—	—		(81,000		)	—			—	—			(81,000		)
Reversal of deferred tax assets associated with expired and unexercised stock-based awards	—	—		(1,186,000		)	—			—	—			(1,186,000		)
Repurchases of common stock	—	—		—			—			5,066,292	(155,744,000		)	(155,744,000		)
Net income	—	—		—			18,422,000			—	—			18,422,000
Balance as of January 31, 2012	28,869,089	$	2,887,000	$	358,697,000		$	400,077,000		9,574,737	$	(277,547,000	)	$	484,114,000


Balance as of July 31, 2012	28,931,679	$	2,893,000	$	361,458,000		$	404,227,000		11,564,059	$	(339,177,000	)	$	429,401,000

Equity-classified stock award compensation	—	—		1,532,000			—			—	—			1,532,000
Proceeds from exercise of options	25,800	3,000		443,000			—			—	—			446,000
Proceeds from issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares	21,222	2,000		476,000			—			—	—			478,000
Cash dividends declared	—	—		—			(9,562,000		)	—	—			(9,562,000		)
Net excess income tax benefit from stock-based award exercises	—	—		14,000			—			—	—			14,000
Reversal of deferred tax assets associated with expired and unexercised stock-based awards	—	—		(2,955,000		)	—			—	—			(2,955,000		)
Repurchases of common stock	—	—		—			—			397,798	(10,477,000		)	(10,477,000		)
Net income	—	—		—			9,800,000			—	—			9,800,000
Balance as of January 31, 2013	28,978,701	$	2,898,000	$	360,968,000		$	404,465,000		11,961,857	$	(349,654,000	)	$	418,677,000

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

	Six months ended January 31,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	9,800,000		18,422,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment	4,019,000			4,781,000
Amortization of intangible assets with finite lives	3,164,000			3,411,000
Amortization of stock-based compensation	1,551,000			1,909,000
Deferred financing costs	706,000			746,000
Change in fair value of contingent earn-out liability	(3,267,000		)	—
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment	32,000			2,000
Benefit from allowance for doubtful accounts	(107,000		)	(50,000	)
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory	1,276,000			1,616,000
Excess income tax benefit from stock-based award exercises	(19,000		)	(82,000	)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)	1,029,000			(1,953,000	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	14,113,000			9,949,000
Inventories	905,000			(5,007,000	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(740,000		)	(255,000	)
Other assets	15,000			(23,000	)
Accounts payable	(6,899,000		)	(4,833,000	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	(8,645,000		)	(9,003,000	)
Customer advances and deposits	(3,986,000		)	(2,963,000	)
Other liabilities	588,000			446,000
Interest payable	—			22,000
Income taxes payable	(2,141,000		)	(5,935,000	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	11,394,000			11,200,000

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(2,457,000		)	(2,660,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities	(2,457,000		)	(2,660,000	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repurchases of common stock	(10,477,000		)	(157,745,000	)
Cash dividends paid	(14,335,000		)	(12,202,000	)
Proceeds from exercises of stock options	446,000			2,587,000
Proceeds from issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares	478,000			556,000
Excess income tax benefit from stock-based award exercises	19,000			82,000
Payment of contingent consideration related to business acquisition	(10,000		)	(157,000	)
Fees related to line of credit	(25,000		)	(249,000	)
Net cash used in financing activities	(23,904,000		)	(167,128,000	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(14,967,000		)	(158,588,000	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	367,894,000			558,804,000
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	352,927,000		400,216,000

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
(Continued)

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued) (Unaudited)

	Six months ended January 31,
	2013		2012
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	3,177,000	3,193,000
Income taxes	$	7,070,000	12,481,000

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Cash dividends declared	$	—	5,352,000

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(1) General

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. and Subsidiaries (“Comtech,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) as of and for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the information furnished reflects all material adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the unaudited interim periods. Our results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year.

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Our condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2012 and the notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and all of our other filings with the SEC.

(2) Adoption of Accounting Standards and Updates

We are required to prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) which is the source for all authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which is commonly referred to as “GAAP.” The FASB ASC is subject to updates by FAS B, which are known as Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”).

During the six months ended January 31, 2013 , we did not adopt any new accounting standards or updates.

(3) Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported financial statements to conform to our current financial statement format.

(4) Stock-Based Compensation

We issue stock-based awards to certain of our employees and our Board of Directors and we recognize related stock-based compensation for both equity and liability-classified stock-based awards in our condensed consolidated financial statements. These awards are issued pursuant to our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and our 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). Historically, stock-based awards were granted in the form of stock options and, to a much lesser extent, stock appreciation rights ("SARs"). Commencing in fiscal 2012, we also began issuing restricted stock units ("RSUs") and, to a much lesser extent, stock units.

Stock-based compensation for equity-classified awards is measured at the date of grant, based on an estimate of the fair value of the award and is generally expensed over the vesting period of the award. We expect to settle all outstanding equity-based awards with new shares. Stock-based compensation for liability-classified awards is determined the same way, except that the fair value of liability-classified awards is remeasured at the end of each reporting period until the award is settled, with changes in fair value recognized pro-rata for the portion of the requisite service period rendered. In addition, SARs may only be settled with cash.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Stock-based compensation for awards issued is reflected in the following line items in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:



	Three months ended January 31,					Six months ended January 31,
	2013			2012		2013		2012
Cost of sales	$	74,000		125,000		119,000		178,000
Selling, general and administrative expenses	614,000			795,000		1,215,000		1,440,000
Research and development expenses	118,000			116,000		217,000		291,000
Stock-based compensation expense before income tax benefit	806,000			1,036,000		1,551,000		1,909,000
Income tax benefit	(346,000		)	(394,000	)	(610,000	)	(701,000	)
Net stock-based compensation expense	$	460,000		642,000		941,000		1,208,000

Stock-based compensation expense before income tax benefit, by award type, is summarized as follows:



	Three months ended January 31,				Six months ended January 31,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Stock options	$	638,000	991,000		1,211,000		1,783,000
ESPP	48,000		59,000		101,000		120,000
RSUs with performance measures	86,000		—		172,000		—
RSUs without performance measures	28,000		—		60,000		—
Stock units	6,000		—		12,000		—
SARs	—		(14,000	)	(5,000	)	6,000
Stock-based compensation expense before income tax benefit	$	806,000	1,036,000		1,551,000		1,909,000

Stock options granted during the six months ended January 31, 2013 had exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, a contractual term of ten years and a vesting period of five years. Stock options granted during the six months ended January 31, 2012 had exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, a contractual term of five or ten years and a vesting period of three or five years. The per share weighted average grant-date fair value of stock-based awards granted during the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 approximated $5.46 . The per share weighted average grant-date fair value of stock-based awards granted during the three and six months ended January 31, 2012 approximated $6.34 and $5.93 , respectively. We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model includes assumptions regarding dividend yield, expected volatility, expected option term and risk-free interest rates. In estimating the fair value of the stock options that were issued during the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , we utilized the following weighted average assumptions:



	Three months ended January 31,				Six months ended January 31,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Expected dividend yield	4.29	%	3.68	%	4.29	%	4.00	%
Expected volatility	37.00	%	37.70	%	37.00	%	36.20	%
Risk-free interest rate	0.61	%	0.42	%	0.61	%	0.83	%
Expected life (years)	5.31		3.81		5.31		5.24

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

The expected dividend yield is the expected annual dividend (based on our Board's annual dividend target which, as of January 31, 2013, is currently $1.10 per share) as a percentage of the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. We estimate expected volatility by considering the historical volatility of our stock, the implied volatility of publicly-traded call options on our stock, the implied volatility of call options embedded in our 3.0% convertible senior notes and our expectations of volatility for the expected life of stock options. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for an instrument which closely approximates the expected option term. The expected option term is the number of years we estimate that stock options will be outstanding prior to exercise. The expected life of awards issued is determined by employee groups with sufficiently distinct behavior patterns.

RSUs with performance measures that were granted to certain employees vest over a 5.3 year period beginning on the date of grant, if pre-established performance goals are attained. As of January 31, 2013 , we expect that the goals relating to RSUs with performance measures outstanding will be attained. RSUs without performance measures that were granted to non-employee directors have a vesting period of three years from the date of grant. The fair value of RSUs is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant, net of the present value of dividends using the applicable risk-free interest rate, as RSUs are not entitled to dividend equivalents while unvested and the underlying shares are unissued. RSUs with performance measures are convertible into shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis at the end of each vesting tranche for no cash consideration. RSUs without performance measures are convertible into shares of our common stock generally at the time of termination, on a one-for-one basis for no cash consideration, or earlier under certain specific circumstances.

Fully-vested stock units granted during the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 had a weighted average grant-date market value of $25.56 and $26.78 per share, respectively, based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock units granted are convertible into shares of our common stock generally at the time of termination, on a one-for-one basis for no cash consideration, or earlier under certain specific circumstances.

ESPP expense, reflected in the table above, for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 primarily relates to the 15% discount offered to employees participating in the ESPP.

Similar to our stock options, SARs that are outstanding at January 31, 2013 have exercise prices equal to the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant, a contractual term of five years, a vesting period of three years and are measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Included in accrued expenses at January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 is $1,000 and $6,000 , respectively, relating to the potential cash settlement of SARs.

Stock-based compensation that was capitalized and included in ending inventory at January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 was $24,000 and $48,000 , respectively.

At January 31, 2013 , total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based awards was $7,805,000 , net of estimated forfeitures of $591,000 . The net cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

The following table provides the components of the actual income tax benefit recognized for tax deductions relating to the exercise of stock-based awards:



	Six months ended January 31,
	2013		2012
Actual income tax benefit recorded for the tax deductions relating to the exercise of stock-based awards	$	79,000	235,000
Less: Tax benefit initially recognized on exercised stock-based awards vesting subsequent to the adoption of accounting standards that require us to expense stock-based awards, excluding income tax shortfalls	60,000		151,000
Excess income tax benefit recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital	19,000		84,000
Less: Tax benefit initially disclosed but not previously recognized on exercised equity-classified stock-based awards vesting prior to the adoption of accounting standards that require us to expense stock-based awards	—		2,000
Excess income tax benefit from exercised equity-classified stock-based awards reported as a cash flow from financing activities in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	$	19,000	82,000

As of January 31, 2013 , the amount of hypothetical tax benefits related to stock-based awards, recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital, was $19,846,000 . During the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $2,955,000 and $1,186,000 , respectively, as a reduction to additional paid-in capital and accumulated hypothetical tax benefits related to stock-based awards. Such amounts represent the reversal of unrealized deferred tax assets associated with certain vested equity-classified stock-based awards that expired during the period.

(5) Fair Value Measurements and Financial Instruments

In accordance with FASB ASC 825, “Financial Instruments ,” we determined that, as of January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 , the fair value of our 3.0% convertible senior notes was approximately $206,460,000 and $211,920,000 , respectively, based on quoted market prices in an active market. Our 3.0% convertible senior notes are not marked-to-market and are shown on the accompanying balance sheet at their original issuance value. As such, changes in the estimated fair value of our 3.0% convertible senior notes are not recorded in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 , we had approximately $58,160,000 and $84,610,000 , respectively, of money market mutual funds which are classified as cash and cash equivalents in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. These money market mutual funds are recorded at their current fair value. FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” requires us to define fair value as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, using the fair value hierarchy described in FASB ASC 820, we valued our money market mutual funds using Level 1 inputs that were based on quoted market prices.

At January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 , we had a contingent earn-out liability relating to our acquisition of Stampede Technologies, Inc. (“Stampede”) of $375,000 and $3,519,000 , respectively, which is recorded at current fair value using Level 3 inputs, primarily management's estimates of future sales and cash flows relating to the earn-out, which also incorporated market participant expectations. See Note (9) - " Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities. "

As of January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 , other than our cash and cash equivale nts and our contingent earn-out liability, we had no other assets or liabilities included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets recorded at current fair value. If we acquire different types of assets or incur different types of liabilities in the future, we might be required to use different FASB ASC fair value methodologies.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

(6) Earnings Per Share

Our basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares, including fully-vested stock units, outstanding during each respective period. Our diluted EPS reflects the dilution from potential common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of equity-classified stock-based awards and convertible senior notes, if dilutive, outstanding during each respective period. When calculating our diluted earnings per share, we consider (i) the amount a recipient must pay upon assumed exercise of stock-based awards; (ii) the amount of stock-based compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized; and (iii) the amount of excess tax benefits, if any, that would be credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of in-the-money stock-based awards. This excess tax benefit is the amount resulting from a tax deduction for compensation in excess of compensation expense, based on the Black Scholes option pricing model, recognized for financial reporting purposes.

Equity-classified stock-based awards to purcha se 2,658,000 and 2,147,000 shares for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, were not included in our diluted EPS calculation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Equity-classified stock-based awards to purchase 2,680,000 and 2,647,000 shares for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, were not included in our diluted EPS calculation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Our diluted EPS calculation for the three months ended January 31, 2013 excludes the effect of 5,992,000 shares and $1,117,000 of interest expense (net of tax) related to our 3.0% convertible senior notes, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive for the period. Liability-classified stock-based awards do not impact and are not included in the denominator for EPS calculations.

In addition, the weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 reflects a reduction of approximately 102,000 and 1,544,000 shares as a result of the repurchase of our common shares during the respective periods. The weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 reflects a reduction of approximately 51,000 and 2,627,000 shares as a result of the repurchase of our common shares during the respective periods. See Note (19) – “ Stockholders’ Equity ” for more information on the stock repurchase program.

The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the basic and diluted EPS calculations:



	Three months ended January 31,			Six months ended January 31,
	2013		2012	2013	2012
Numerator:
Net income for basic calculation	$	2,365,000	5,821,000	9,800,000	18,422,000
Effect of dilutive securities:
Interest expense (net of tax) on 3.0% convertible senior notes	—		1,117,000	2,234,000	2,234,000
Numerator for diluted calculation	$	2,365,000	6,938,000	12,034,000	20,656,000

Denominator:
Denominator for basic calculation	17,300,000		20,087,000	17,340,000	21,672,000
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock-based awards	101,000		228,000	105,000	200,000
Conversion of 3.0% convertible senior notes	—		5,741,000	5,949,000	5,716,000
Denominator for diluted calculation	17,401,000		26,056,000	23,394,000	27,588,000

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

(7) Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consist of the following at:



	January 31, 2013		July 31, 2012
Billed receivables from commercial customers	$	30,082,000	41,139,000
Billed receivables from the U.S. government and its agencies	9,094,000		11,927,000
Unbilled receivables on contracts-in-progress	4,107,000		4,764,000
Total accounts receivable	43,283,000		57,830,000
Less allowance for doubtful accounts	1,047,000		1,588,000
Accounts receivable, net	$	42,236,000	56,242,000

Unbilled receivables on contracts-in-progress include $2,338,000 and $3,320,000 at January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 , respectively, due from the U.S. government and its agencies. We had virtually no retainage included in unbilled receivables at both January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 . In the opinion of management, a substantial portion of the unbilled balances will be billed and collected within one year.

(8) Inventories

Inventories consist of the following at:



	January 31, 2013		July 31, 2012
Raw materials and components	$	54,964,000	55,404,000
Work-in-process and finished goods	30,350,000		33,243,000
Total inventories	85,314,000		88,647,000
Less reserve for excess and obsolete inventories	15,158,000		16,286,000
Inventories, net	$	70,156,000	72,361,000

At January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 , the amount of total inventory directly related to long-term contracts (including contracts-in-progress) was $1,543,000 and $2,041,000 , respectively.

At January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 , $552,000 and $1,070,000 , respectively, of the inventory balance above related to contracts from third party commercial customer s who outsource their manufacturing to us.

(9) Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following at:



	January 31, 2013		July 31, 2012
Accrued wages and benefits	$	9,068,000	16,467,000
Accrued warranty obligations (see below)	8,664,000		7,883,000
Accrued commissions and royalties	5,009,000		3,946,000
Accrued business acquisition payments (see below)	375,000		1,752,000
Other	7,702,000		10,822,000
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	30,818,000	40,870,000

Accrued Warranty Obligations

We provide warranty coverage for most of our products for a period of at least one year from the date of shipment. We record a liability for estimated warranty expense based on historical claims, product failure rates and other factors. Some of our product warranties are provided under long-term contracts, the costs of which are incorporated into our estimates of total contract costs.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Changes in our product warranty liability were as follows:



	Six months ended January 31,
	2013			2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,883,000		9,120,000
Provision for warranty obligations	3,709,000			3,194,000
Charges incurred	(2,928,000		)	(3,462,000	)
Balance at end of period	$	8,664,000		8,852,000

Accrued Business Acquisition Payments

In October 2010 , we acquired the WAN optimization technology assets and assumed certain liabilities of Stampede for an estimated total purchase price of approx imately $5,303,000 . Almost all of the purchase price for Stampede was allocated to the estimated fair value of technologies acquired and was assigned an estimated amortizable life of five years . As of January 31, 2013 , we maintain a liability of approximately $375,000 for contingent earn-out payments we expect to make, through October 1, 2013 , based on the likelihood that certain revenue and related gross margin milestones will be met in future periods. We review our estimates and updated forecasts on a quarterly basis and record adjustments as required. In fiscal 2013, we recorded a benefit of $889,000 and $3,267,000 related to a change in fair value of the earn-out liability, which is reflected as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 , respectively. There was no change in the fair value of the earn-out liability during the three and six months ended January 31, 2012 .

Interest accreted on the contingent earn-out liability for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $25,000 and $133,000 , respectively, and $119,000 and $241,000 , respectively, and total interest accreted through January 31, 2013 was $986,000 . As of January 31, 2013 , we paid $1,729,000 of the total purchase price in cash, including $229,000 of earn-out payments.

(10) Cost Reduction Actions

Wind-Down of Microsatellite Product Line

During the six months ended January 31, 2013 , we completed our fiscal 2012 plan to wind-down our mobile data communications segment's microsatellite product line. In connection with this plan, we recorded a pre-tax benefit of $253,000 for the three months ended January 31, 2013 , resulting from the reversal of previously accrued costs that were lower than expected. For the six months ended January 31, 2013 , we recorded a net pre-tax restructuring charge of $569,000 related to this plan. Almost all of these amounts are reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 .

The activity pertaining to the accruals with respect to this plan, since July 31, 2012, are summarized as follows:



	Facility exit costs			Severance and related costs		Other		Total
Balance as of July 31, 2012	$	496,000		310,000		330,000		$	1,136,000
Additions/(reversals)	654,000			76,000		(161,000	)	569,000
Payments made	(373,000		)	(386,000	)	(17,000	)	(776,000		)
Balance as of January 31, 2013	$	777,000		—		152,000		$	929,000

Of the total remaining restructuring-related liabilities of $929,000 , $666,000 is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $263,000 is included in other long-term liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 31, 2013 . In connection with the wind-down of our mobile data communications segment's microsatellite product line, during the six months ended January 31, 2013 , we transferred certain miscellaneous assets and liabilities to third parties for no cash consideration. As the estimated fair values of the assets transferred and liabilities relinquished were approximately equal, these transactions did not result in any gain or loss.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Radyne Acquisition-Related Restructuring Plan

In connection with our August 1, 2008 acquisition of Radyne, we adopted a restructuring plan for which we recorded $2,713,000 of estimated restructuring costs. Of this amount, $613,000 relates to severance for Radyne employees which was paid in fiscal 2009. The remaining estimated amounts relate to facility exit costs and were determined as follows:



	At August 1, 2008
Total non-cancelable lease obligations	$	12,741,000
Less: Estimated sublease income	8,600,000
Total net estimated facility exit costs	4,141,000
Less: Interest expense to be accreted	2,041,000
Present value of estimated facility exit costs	$	2,100,000

Our total non-cancelable lease obligations were based on the actual lease term which runs from November 1, 2008 through October 31, 2018 . We estimated sublease income based on (i) the terms of a fully executed sublease agreement, whose lease term runs from November 1, 2008 through October 31, 2015 and (ii) our assessment of future uncertainties relating to the commercial real estate market. Based on our assessment of commercial real estate market conditions, we currently believe that it is not probable that we will be able to sublease the facility beyond the current sublease terms. As such, in accordance with grandfathered accounting standards that were not incorporated into the FASB’s ASC, we recorded these costs, at fair value, as assumed liabilities as of August 1, 2008, with a corresponding increase to goodwill.

As of January 31, 2013 , the amount of the acquisition-related restructuring reserve is as follows:



	Cumulative Activity Through January 31, 2013
Present value of estimated facility exit costs at August 1, 2008	$	2,100,000
Cash payments made	(4,811,000		)
Cash payments received	5,108,000
Accreted interest recorded	724,000
Net liability as of January 31, 2013	3,121,000
Amount recorded as prepaid expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet	427,000
Amount recorded as other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet	$	3,548,000

As of July 31, 2012 , the present value of the estimated facility exit costs was $2,916,000 . During the six months ended January 31, 2013 , we made cash payments of $510,000 and we received cash payments of $610,000 . Interest accreted for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $53,000 and $105,000 , respectively, and $46,000 and $91,000 , respectively, and is included in interest expense for each respective fiscal period.

As of January 31, 2013 , future cash payments associated with our restructuring plan are summarized below:



	As of January 31, 2013
Future lease payments to be made in excess of anticipated sublease payments	$	3,548,000
Less net cash to be received in next twelve months	(427,000		)
Interest expense to be accreted in future periods	1,317,000
Total remaining net cash payments	$	4,438,000

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 Cost Reduction Actions

In addition to the items above, during the six months ended January 31, 2013 , we continued to implement other cost reduction actions; principally headcount reductions. The costs for these actions were not material for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

(11) Credit Facility

We have a committed $100,000,000 secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of bank lenders, as amended on June 6, 2012. The Credit Facility expires on April 30, 2014 but may be extended by us to December 31, 2016 , subject to certain conditions relating primarily to the repurchase, redemption or conversion of our 3.0% convertible senior notes and compliance with all other Credit Facility covenants.

The Credit Facility provides for the extension of credit to us in the form of revolving loans, including letters of credit, at any time and from time to time during its term, in an aggregate principal amount at any time outstanding not to exceed $100,000,000 for both revolving loans and letters of credit, with sub-limits of $15,000,000 for commercial letters of credit and $35,000,000 for standby letters of credit. The Credit Facility may be used for acquisitions, equity securities repurchases, dividends, working capital and other general corporate purposes.

At our election, borrowings under the Credit Facility will bear interest either at LIBOR plus an applicable margin or at the base rate plus an applicable margin, as amended. The interest rate margin over LIBOR ranges from 1.75 percent up to a maximum amount of 2.50 percent . The base rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the highest of (i) the Prime Rate; (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate from time to time plus 0.50 percent ; and (iii) two hundred (200) basis points in excess of the floating rate of interest determined, on a daily basis, in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The interest rate margin over the base rate ranges from 0.75 percent up to a maximum amount of 1.50 percent . In both cases, the applicable interest rate margin is based on the ratio of our consolidated total indebtedness to our consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA”). As defined in the Credit Facility, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA is adjusted for certain items and, in the event of an acquisition with a purchase price in excess of $10,000,000 , provides for the inclusion of the last twelve months of consolidated EBITDA of a target.

The Credit Facility contains covenants, including covenants limiting certain debt, certain liens on assets, certain sales of assets and receivables, certain payments (including dividends), certain repurchases of equity securities, certain sale and leaseback transactions, certain guaranties and certain investments. The Credit Facility also contains financial condition covenants requiring that we (i) not exceed a maximum ratio of consolidated total indebtedness to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (each as defined in the Credit Facility); (ii) not exceed a maximum ratio of consolidated senior secured indebtedness to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (each as defined in the Credit Facility); (iii) maintain a minimum fixed charge ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility); (iv) maintain a minimum consolidated net worth; in each case measured on the last day of each fiscal quarter and (v) in the event total consolidated indebtedness (as defined in the Credit Facility) is less than $200,000,000 , we maintain a minimum level of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Facility).

At January 31, 2013 , w e had $1,894,000 of standby letters of credit outstanding related to our guarantees of future performance on certain customer contracts and no commercial letters of credit outstanding.

At January 31, 2013 , had borrowings been outstanding under the Credit Facility, the applicable interest rate margin above LIBOR and base rate borrowings would have been 2.50 percent and 1.50 percent , respectively. We are also subject to an undrawn line fee based on the ratio of our consolidated total indebtedness to our Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, as defined and adjusted for certain items in the Credit Facility. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, related to our credit facility recorded during the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 was $184,000 and $363,000 , respectively, as compared to $244,000 and $451,000 during the three and six months ended January 31, 2012 , respectively.

At January 31, 2013 , based on our Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Facility) and our business outlook and related business plans, we believe we will be able to meet or obtain waivers for the applicable financial covenants that we are required to maintain.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

(12) 3.0% Convertible Senior Notes

In May 2009 , we issued $200,000,000 of our 3.0% convertible senior notes in a private offering pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The net proceeds from this transaction were $194,541,000 after deducting the initial purchasers' discount and other transaction costs of $5,459,000 .

The 3.0% convertible senior notes bear interest at an annual rate of 3.0% . Pursuant to the terms of the 3.0% convertible senior notes indenture, cash dividends require an adjustment to the conversion rate, effective on the record date. Effective December 17, 2012 (the record date of our dividend declared on December 6, 2012), the 3.0% convertible senior notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $33.19 per share (a conversion rate of 30.1255 shares per $1,000 original principal amount of notes) at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.

We may, at our option, redeem some or all of the 3.0% convertible senior notes on or after May 5, 2014 . Holders of the 3.0% convertible senior notes will have the right to require us to repurchase some or all of the outstanding 3.0% convertible senior notes, solely for cash, on May 1, 2014 , May 1, 2019 and May 1, 2024 and upon certain events, including a change in control. If not redeemed by us or repaid pursuant to the holders' right to require repurchase, the 3.0% convertible senior notes mature on May 1, 2029 .

The 3.0% convertible notes are senior unsecured obligations of Comtech.

(13) Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate was 37.8% for the six months ended January 31, 2013 , which includes a net discrete tax expense of approximately $365,000 principally relating to the establishment of a valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets of one of our foreign subsidiaries, offset, in part, by the passage of legislation that included the retroactive extension of the federal research and experimentation credit from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013. Excluding the impact of discrete tax items, our fiscal 2013 estimated effective tax rate is expected to approximate 35.5% .

At January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 , total unrecognized tax benefits, all of which were recorded as non-current income taxes payable in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, were $3,074,000 and $2,624,000 , respectively, including interest of $126,000 and $95,000 , respectively. Of these amounts, $2,351,000 and $1,990,000 , respectively, net of the reversal of the federal benefit recognized as deferred tax assets relating to state reserves, excluding interest, would positively impact our effective tax rate, if recognized. Unrecognized tax benefits result from income tax positions taken or expected to be taken on our income tax returns for which a tax benefit has not been recorded in our financial statements.

Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

Our federal income tax returns for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012 are subject to potential future IRS audit. Future tax assessments or settlements could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

(14) Stock Option Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan

We issue stock-based awards pursuant to the following plan:

2000 Stock Incentive Plan – The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), as amended, provides for the granting to all employees and consultants of Comtech (including prospective employees and consultants) non-qualified stock options, SARs, restricted stock, RSU, RSUs with performance measures (known as performance shares under the Plan), performance units, stock units, and other stock-based awards. In addition, our employees are eligible to be granted incentive stock options. Our non-employee directors are eligible to receive non-discretionary grants of non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, stock units and other stock-based awards, subject to certain limitations. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be issued may not exceed 8,962,500 . Grants of incentive and non-qualified stock awards may not have a term exceeding ten years or, in the case of an incentive stock award granted to a stockholder who owns stock representing more than 10.0% of the voting power, no more than five years .

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

As of January 31, 2013 , we had granted stock-based awards representing the right to purchase and/or acquire an aggregate of 6,683,136 shares (net of 2,224,890 expired and canceled awards), of which 2,926,126 were outstanding at January 31, 2013 . Stock options and SARs were granted at prices ranging between $3.13 - $51.65 . As of January 31, 2013 , an aggregate of 3,757,010 stock-based awards have been exercised, of which 750 were SARs. No stock units, RSUs or performance shares granted to date have been converted into common stock as of January 31, 2013 .

The following table summarizes stock option plan activity during the six months ended January 31, 2013 :



	Number of Shares Underlying Stock-Based Awards		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at July 31, 2012	3,506,484		$	31.17
Granted	222		—
Expired/canceled	(542,075	)	40.95
Exercised	(16,200	)	19.95
Outstanding at October 31, 2012	2,948,431		29.44
Granted	4,245		24.15
Expired/canceled	(16,950	)	34.35
Exercised	(9,600	)	12.72
Outstanding at January 31, 2013	2,926,126		$	29.46	4.70	$	4,037,000

Exercisable at January 31, 2013	1,681,275		$	30.97	2.34	$	2,769,000

Vested and expected to vest at January 31, 2013	2,860,292		$	29.49	4.62	$	3,990,000

RSUs, stock units and performance shares are convertible into shares of our common stock, are subject to certain terms and restrictions, do not require the recipient to pay an exercise price, and are not subject to expiration. As such, for these awards, the weighted average exercise price and the weighted average remaining contractual term reflected in the above table assumes a zero dollar exercise price and no expiration, respectively.

Included in the number of shares underlying stock-based awards outstanding at January 31, 2013 of 2,926,126 , in the above table, are 17,000 vested SARs, 877 vested stock units, 12,668 unvested RSUs and 35,003 unvested RSUs with performance measures, with a combined aggregate intrinsic value of $1,287,000 .

The total intrinsic value of stock-based awards exercised during the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $125,000 and $145,000 , respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock-based awards exercised during the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $264,000 and $1,009,000 , respectively.

2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan – The ESPP was approved by the shareholders on December 12, 2000, and 675,000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance. The ESPP is intended to provide our eligible employees the opportunity to acquire our common stock at 85% of fair market value at the date of issuance through participation in the payroll-deduction based ESPP. Through January 31, 2013 , we have cumulatively issued 495,240 shares of our common stock to participating employees in connection with the ESPP.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

(15) Customer and Geographic Information

Sales by geography and customer type, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, are as follows:



	Three months ended January 31,				Six months ended January 31,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
United States
U.S. government	32.8	%	46.5	%	38.6	%	47.5	%
Commercial	12.9	%	12.1	%	13.3	%	12.5	%
Total United States	45.7	%	58.6	%	51.9	%	60.0	%

International	54.3	%	41.4	%	48.1	%	40.0	%

Sales to U.S. government customers include the Department of Defense ("DoD") and intelligence and civilian agencies, as well as sales directly to or through prime contractors. International sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 (which include sales to U.S. domestic companies for inclusion in products that will be sold to international customers) were $40,471,000 and $40,990,000 , respectively. International sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 (which include sales to U.S. domestic companies for inclusion in products that will be sold to international customers) were $79,689,000 and $84,968,000 , respectively.

For the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , except for sales (both direct and indirect) to U.S. government customers, no other customer or individual country (including sales to U.S. domestic companies for inclusion in products that will be sold to a foreign country) represented more than 10% of consolidated net sales.

(16) Segment Information

Reportable operating segments are determined based on Comtech’s management approach. The management approach, as defined by FASB ASC 280, “Segment Reporting,” is based on the way that the chief operating decision-maker organizes the segments within an enterprise for making decisions about resources to be allocated and assessing their performance. Our chief operating decision-maker is our President and Chief Executive Officer.

While our results of operations are primarily reviewed on a consolidated basis, the chief operating decision-maker also manages the enterprise in three operating segments: (i) telecommunications transmission, (ii) RF microwave amplifiers, and (iii) mobile data communications.

Telecommunications transmission products include satellite earth station products (such as analog and digital modems, frequency converters, power amplifiers, transceivers and voice gateways) and over-the-horizon microwave communications products and systems (such as digital troposcatter modems).

RF microwave amplifier products include traveling wave tube amplifiers and solid-state, high-power broadband amplifier products that use the microwave and radio frequency spectrums.

Mobile data communications products include satellite-based mobile location tracking and messaging hardware (such as mobile satellite transceivers and third-party produced ruggedized computers) and related services. Prior to July 31, 2012, we designed, manufactured and sold microsatellites, primarily to U.S. government customers. We completed a restructuring plan to wind-down our microsatellite product line in the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Corporate management defines and reviews segment profitability based on the same allocation methodology as presented in the segment data tables below:



	Three months ended January 31, 2013
	Telecommunications Transmission			RF Microwave Amplifiers		Mobile Data Communications		Unallocated		Total
Net sales	$	45,769,000		20,362,000		8,446,000		—		$	74,577,000
Operating income (loss)	5,549,000			645,000		2,994,000		(3,241,000	)	5,947,000
Interest income and other (expense)	(26,000		)	(7,000	)	3,000		345,000		315,000
Interest expense (income)	80,000			—		(6,000	)	1,956,000		2,030,000
Depreciation and amortization	2,427,000			977,000		134,000		844,000		4,382,000
Expenditure for long-lived assets, including intangibles	1,228,000			135,000		26,000		5,000		1,394,000
Total assets at January 31, 2013	226,656,000			93,208,000		10,651,000		354,232,000		684,747,000



	Three months ended January 31, 2012
	Telecommunications Transmission		RF Microwave Amplifiers		Mobile Data Communications	Unallocated		Total
Net sales	$	51,328,000	22,437,000		25,376,000	—		$	99,141,000
Operating income (loss)	8,319,000		1,195,000		4,408,000	(3,268,000	)	10,654,000
Interest income and other (expense)	14,000		(3,000	)	7,000	416,000		434,000
Interest expense	166,000		—		—	2,017,000		2,183,000
Depreciation and amortization	2,507,000		1,101,000		397,000	1,084,000		5,089,000
Expenditure for long-lived assets, including intangibles	799,000		369,000		49,000	—		1,217,000
Total assets at January 31, 2012	241,369,000		103,445,000		25,160,000	395,426,000		765,400,000

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)



	Six months ended January 31, 2013
	Telecommunications Transmission			RF Microwave Amplifiers		Mobile Data Communications		Unallocated		Total
Net sales	$	99,096,000		45,651,000		20,783,000		—		$	165,530,000
Operating income (loss)	17,808,000			2,363,000		6,465,000		(7,327,000	)	19,309,000
Interest income and other (expense)	(35,000		)	(29,000	)	12,000		643,000		591,000
Interest expense (income)	239,000			—		(6,000	)	3,908,000		4,141,000
Depreciation and amortization	4,863,000			1,957,000		286,000		1,628,000		8,734,000
Expenditure for long-lived assets, including intangibles	2,069,000			342,000		41,000		5,000		2,457,000
Total assets at January 31, 2013	226,656,000			93,208,000		10,651,000		354,232,000		684,747,000



	Six months ended January 31, 2012
	Telecommunications Transmission		RF Microwave Amplifiers		Mobile Data Communications	Unallocated		Total
Net sales	$	108,124,000	43,550,000		60,828,000	—		$	212,502,000
Operating income (loss)	21,353,000		1,518,000		13,771,000	(10,229,000	)	26,413,000
Interest income and other (expense)	20,000		(6,000	)	16,000	900,000		930,000
Interest expense	332,000		—		—	3,997,000		4,329,000
Depreciation and amortization	5,074,000		2,204,000		817,000	2,006,000		10,101,000
Expenditure for long-lived assets, including intangibles	2,070,000		475,000		115,000	—		2,660,000
Total assets at January 31, 2012	241,369,000		103,445,000		25,160,000	395,426,000		765,400,000

Operating income in our telecommunications transmission segment for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 includes $889,000 and $3,267,000 , respectively, of a benefit related to a change in fair value of the earn-out liability associated with our acquisition of Stampede. See Note (9) - " Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities. "

Operating income in our mobile data communications segment, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 , includes a benefit of $253,000 relating to an adjustment for actual pre-tax restructuring charges that were lower than expected and, for the six months ended January 31, 2013 , includes a net $569,000 of pre-tax restructuring charges; all of which related to the wind-down of our microsatellite product line. See Note (10) - " Cost Reduction Actions ."

Unallocated operating loss for the six months ended January 31, 2012 includes $2,638,000 of professional fees related to a withdrawn contested proxy solicitation in connection with our fiscal 2011 annual meeting of stockholders.

Unallocated expenses result from such corporate expenses as legal, accounting and executive compensation. In addition, for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 , unallocated expenses include $806,000 and $1,551,000 , respectively, of stock-based compensation expense and for the three and six months ended January 31, 2012 , unallocated expenses include $1,036,000 and $1,909,000 , respectively, of stock-based compensation expense. Interest expense (which includes amortization of deferred financing costs) associated with our convertible senior notes and our Credit Facility is not allocated to the operating segments. Depreciation and amortization includes amortization of stock-based compensation.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Unallocated assets consist principally of cash, deferred financing costs and deferred tax assets. Substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the U.S.

Intersegment sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 by the telecommunications transmission segment to the RF microwave amplifiers segment were $423,000 and $985,000 , respectively. Intersegment sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 by the telecommunications transmission segment to the RF microwave amplifiers segment were $1,657,000 and $1,699,000 , respectively.

Intersegment sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 by the telecommunications transmission segment to the mobile data communications segment were $112,000 and $1,400,000 , respectively. Intersegment sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 by the telecommunications transmission segment to the mobile data communications segment were $2,619,000 and $4,890,000 , respectively.

All other intersegment sales were immaterial for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 .

All intersegment sales have been eliminated from the tables above.

(17) Goodwill

The carrying amount of goodwill by segment as of January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 are as follows:



	Telecommunications Transmission		RF Microwave Amplifiers	Mobile Data Communications		Total
Goodwill	$	107,779,000	29,575,000	13,249,000		$	150,603,000
Accumulated impairment	—		—	(13,249,000	)	(13,249,000		)
Balance	$	107,779,000	29,575,000	—		$	137,354,000

In accordance with FASB ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,” we perform goodwill impairment testing at least annually, unless indicators of impairment exist in interim periods. The impairment test for goodwill uses a two-step approach. Step one compares the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with goodwill to its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, step two must be performed. Step two compares the carrying value of the reporting unit to the fair value of all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit (including any unrecognized intangibles) as if the reporting unit was acquired in a business combination. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.

For purposes of reviewing impairment and the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets, each of our three operating segments constitutes a reporting unit and we must make various assumptions in determining the fair values of the reporting unit. We perform an annual impairment review in the first quarter of each fiscal year.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

On August 1, 2012 (the first day of our fiscal 2013), we performed our annual goodwill impairment test and estimated the fair value of each of our reporting units based on the income approach (also known as the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method, which utilizes the present value of cash flows to estimate fair value). The future cash flows for our reporting units were projected based on our estimates, at that time, of future revenues, operating income and other factors (such as working capital and capital expenditures). We took into account expected challenging global industry and market conditions, including expected significant reductions in the overall budget for U.S. defense spending. As such, although both reporting units with goodwill have historically achieved significant long-term revenue and operating income growth, we assumed growth rate estimates in our projections that were below our actual long-term expectations and below each reporting unit's actual historical growth rate. The discount rates used in our DCF method were based on a weighted-average cost of capital (“WACC”) determined from relevant market comparisons, adjusted upward for specific reporting unit risks (primarily the uncertainty of achieving projected operating cash flows). A terminal value growth rate was applied to the final year of the projected period and reflected our estimate of stable, perpetual growth. We then calculated a present value of the respective cash flows for each reporting unit to arrive at an estimate of fair value under the income approach and then used the market approach to corroborate this value. Under the market approach, we estimated a fair value based on comparable companies' market multiples of revenues and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and factored in a control premium. In each case, the estimated fair value determined under the market approach exceeded our estimate of fair value determined under the income approach. Finally, we compared our estimates to our August 1, 2012 total public market capitalization and assessed implied control premiums. Based on the aforementioned, we concluded that the estimated fair value determined under the income approach for each of our reporting units, as of August 1, 2012, was reasonable. In each case, the estimated fair value exceeded the respective carrying value. We concluded that the goodwill assigned to our telecommunications transmission and RF microwave amplifiers reporting units, as of August 1, 2012, was not impaired and that neither reporting unit was at risk of failing step one of the goodwill impairment test as prescribed under the ASC.

In recent months, global business conditions have significantly deteriorated. By December 31, 2012, the U.S. government (which accounted for 38.6% of our consolidated net sales during the six months ended January 31, 2013) had failed to either identify required spending reductions or provide, with specificity, the allocation and prioritization of future U.S. Department of Defense requirements. As a result of this failure and irrespective of whether or not these issues are resolved in the short-term, we believe the U.S. government's failure to timely resolve its budget issues has resulted in increased uncertainty amongst our global customer base. In fact, according to recent reports, the economies of several European countries unexpectedly contracted in the fourth quarter of calendar year 2012. At the same time, many of our international customers are also being affected by increasingly volatile political conditions in their respective countries. In aggregate, we believe these issues have resulted in many of our customers reducing or delaying their spending for our products and services. As such, we have updated our fiscal 2013 business outlook to reflect our assessment of current market conditions. In light of the aforementioned, we also concluded that it was appropriate for us to perform a quantitative step one interim goodwill impairment test as of January 31, 2013.

As of January 31, 2013, taking into consideration our updated business outlook for fiscal 2013 and current difficult market conditions, we updated our future cash flow assumptions and calculated updated estimates of fair value using the income approach. In particular, we lowered our August 1, 2012 goodwill impairment test projections of future revenue and operating income growth and adjusted other factors (such as working capital and capital expenditures) for our telecommunications transmission and RF microwave amplifiers reporting units. After updating our assumptions and projections, we then calculated a present value of the respective cash flows to arrive at an estimate of fair value for each reporting unit under the income approach as of January 31, 2013. Consistent with our annual impairment test on August 1, 2012, we corroborated this value with updated estimates of fair value determined under the market approach. For each of the two reporting units with goodwill, the estimated fair value determined under the market approach exceeded our estimate of fair value under the income approach. Finally, we compared our estimates to our January 31, 2013 total public market capitalization and assessed the implied control premium. Based on the aforementioned, we concluded that the estimated fair value determined under the income approach for each of our reporting units, as of January 31, 2013, was reasonable. In each case, the estimated fair value exceeded the respective carrying value and, as such, we concluded that the goodwill assigned to our telecommunications transmission and RF microwave amplifiers reporting units, as of January 31, 2013, was not impaired. We also concluded that our telecommunications transmission reporting unit was currently not at risk of failing step one of the goodwill impairment test as prescribed under the ASC. However, we concluded that, as of January 31, 2013, our RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit was at risk of failing step one of the goodwill impairment test.

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

As of January 31, 2013, we determined that our RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit had an estimated fair value in excess of its respective carrying value of at least 5.0% . The estimated fair value of our RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit is closely aligned with the ultimate amount of revenue and operating income that it achieves over the projected period. Our discounted cash flows, for goodwill impairment testing purposes, assumed that, through fiscal 2018, this reporting unit would achieve a compounded annual revenue growth rate of approximately 1.4% from its actual fiscal 2012 revenue of $102,497,000 . Beyond fiscal 2018, we assumed a long-term revenue growth rate of 3.5% in the terminal year. As of January 31, 2013, we utilized a WACC of 12.0% for the RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit which reflected a 100 basis point increase from the WACC utilized in our August 1, 2012 goodwill impairment test. Given current challenging market conditions, we believe these modest long-term growth rates and the WACC are appropriate to use for our future cash flow assumptions due to the uncertainty that currently exists amongst our customer base. We also believe that it is possible that our actual revenue growth rates could be significantly higher due to a number of factors, including: (i) continued reliance by our customers on our advanced communications systems; (ii) the continued shift toward information-based, network-centric warfare; and (iii) the need for developing countries to upgrade their communication systems. If we do not at least meet the assumed revenue growth utilized in our January 31, 2013 goodwill impairment analysis, the RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit will likely fail step one of a goodwill impairment test in a future period. Modest changes in other key assumptions used in our January 31, 2013 impairment analysis may result in the requirement to proceed to step two of the goodwill impairment test in future periods. For example, keeping all other variables constant, a further 50 basis point increase in the WACC applied to the RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit or an increase to the RF microwave amplifiers carrying value of more than $5,000,000 would likely result in a step one failure. If this reporting unit fails step one in the future, we would be required to perform step two of the goodwill impairment test. If we perform step two, up to $29,575,000 of goodwill assigned to this reporting unit could be written off in the period that the impairment is triggered.

During the second half of our fiscal 2013, because our goodwill impairment analysis is sensitive to the ultimate spending decisions by our global customers, we will continue to monitor key assumptions and other factors utilized in our January 31, 2013 interim goodwill impairment analysis. Currently, it remains difficult to project the ultimate impact of ongoing U.S. government budget constraints or to predict the spending plans of our international customers. In addition to facing weak local economies, we believe our international customers are being impacted by ripple effects of forthcoming U.S. government spending reductions. It is possible that, during the remainder of our fiscal 2013, business conditions (both in the U.S. and internationally) could further deteriorate and our current or prospective customers could materially postpone, reduce or even forgo purchases of our products and services to a greater extent than we currently anticipate. A significant decline in defense spending that is greater than we anticipate or a shift in funding priorities may also have a negative effect on future orders, sales, income and cash flows. If our assumptions and related estimates change in the future, or if we change our reporting structure or other events and circumstances change (e.g., such as a sustained decrease in the price of our common stock (considered on both absolute terms and relative to peers)), we may be required to record impairment charges in future periods. Any impairment charges that we may take in the future could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

In addition to the required goodwill impairment analysis, we also review the recoverability of our net intangibles with finite lives when an indicator of impairment exists. For the same reasons that we performed our interim goodwill impairment analysis as of January 31, 2013, we also assessed the recoverability of the net intangibles with finite lives recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, which aggregated $35,669,000 (of which $19,944,000 relates to our telecommunications transmission segment and $15,725,000 relates to our RF microwave amplifiers segment). Based on our analysis of estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of these net intangibles with finite lives, we determined that their carrying values were recoverable as of January 31, 2013. See Note (18) - " Intangible Assets ."

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

(18) Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with finite lives as of January 31, 2013 and July 31, 2012 are as follows:



	January 31, 2013
	Weighted Average Amortization Period	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization	Net Carrying Amount
Technologies	11.7	$	47,494,000	31,692,000	$	15,802,000
Customer relationships	10.0	29,831,000		13,606,000	16,225,000
Trademarks and other	20.0	5,944,000		2,302,000	3,642,000
Total		$	83,269,000	47,600,000	$	35,669,000



	July 31, 2012
	Weighted Average Amortization Period	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization	Net Carrying Amount
Technologies	11.7	$	47,694,000	30,321,000	$	17,373,000
Customer relationships	10.0	29,931,000		12,231,000	17,700,000
Trademarks and other	20.0	6,044,000		2,284,000	3,760,000
Total		$	83,669,000	44,836,000	$	38,833,000

The weighted average amortization period in the above table excludes fully amortized intangible assets.

Amortization expense for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $1,582,000 , and $1,692,000 , respectively. Amortization expense for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $3,164,000 , and $3,411,000 , respectively.

The estimated amortization expense for the fiscal years ending July 31, 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 is $6,327,000 , $6,285,000 , $6,211,000 , $4,962,000 and $4,782,000 , respectively.

In connection with the wind-down of our mobile data communications segment's microsatellite product line, certain fully amortized intangible assets related to this product line are no longer reflected in the gross carrying a mount or accumulated amortization of our intangible assets as of January 31, 2013 .

(19) Stockholders’ Equity

Stock Repurchase Program

During the six months ended January 31, 2013, we repurchased 397,798 shares of our common stock in open-market transactions with an average price per share of $26.34 and at an aggregate cost of $10,477,000 (including transaction costs). As of January 31, 2013 , we were authorized to repurchase up to an additional $50,798,000 of our common stock, pursuant to a $250,000,000 and a $50,000,000 stock repurchase program that were authorized by our Board of Directors in September 2011 and December 2012 , respectively. In February 2013 , we completed our $250,000,000 stock repurchase program; and as of March 6, 2013 , we can repurchase an additional $45,054,000 pursuant to our $50,000,000 stock repurchase program. The $50,000,000 stock repurchase program has no time restrictions and repurchases may be made in open-market or privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1 trading plans.

During the six months ended January 31, 2012 , we repurchased 5,066,292 shares in open-market transactions for an aggregate cost of $155,744,000 (including transaction costs), with an average price per share of $30.74 . In addition, during the six months ended January 31, 2012 , we paid $2,001,000 for repurchases of our common stock which was accrued as of July 31, 2011 .

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Dividends

In September 2011, our Board of Directors raised our annual targeted dividend from $1.00 per common share, to $1.10 per common share.

During the six months ended January 31, 2013 , our Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends of $0.275 per common share on September 26, 2012 and December 6, 2012 , which were paid to shareholders on November 20, 2012 and December 27, 2012 , respectively.

On March 7, 2013 , our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.275 per common share, payable on May 21, 2013 , to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 19, 2013 .

(20) Legal Proceedings and Other Matters

U.S. Government Investigations

In June 2012, certain officers and employees of the Company received subpoenas issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (“EDNY”) seeking certain documents and records relating to our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). Although the EDNY subpoenas make no specific allegations, we believe the subpoenas relate to a grand jury investigation stemming from our CEO's contacts with a scientific attaché to the Israeli Purchasing Mission in the United States who our CEO met in connection with the sale of our equipment to the State of Israel during the 1980's. This scientific attaché was later alleged to have conducted intelligence operations in the U.S. In August 2012, we were informed by the U.S. government that our CEO's security clearance was suspended. In order to maintain our qualification for government contracts requiring facility security clearance, we have made certain internal organizational realignments. These changes restrict access to classified information to other Comtech senior executives, management and other employees who maintain the required level of clearance.

Separately, in connection with an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) into trading in securities of CPI International, Inc. (“CPI”), we and our CEO, and other persons, have received subpoenas for documents from the SEC concerning transactions in CPI stock by our CEO and other persons (including one subsidiary employee). Our CEO purchased CPI stock in November 2010 which was after the September 2010 termination of our May 2010 agreement to acquire CPI.

We and our CEO are cooperating with the U.S. government regarding the above matters. The independent members of our Board of Directors are monitoring these matters with the assistance of independent counsel.

The outcome of any investigation is inherently difficult, if not impossible, to predict. However, based on our work to date in respect of the subpoenas in each matter, we do not believe that it is likely that either investigation will result in a legal proceeding against our CEO or the Company. If either of these investigations results in a legal proceeding, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) Audit

In May 2011, we were notified that our original BFT-1 contract, which was awarded to us on August 31, 2007 (our fiscal 2008), was selected for a post award audit by the DCAA. We received total funded orders against this contract, which expired December 31, 2011, of $377,342,000 . A post award audit (sometimes referred to as a Truth in Negotiations Act or “TINA” audit) generally focuses on whether the contractor disclosed current, accurate and complete cost or pricing data in the contract negotiation process pursuant to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”).

In January 2012, in connection with the post award audit, the Defense Contract Management Agency (“DCMA”) advised us that the fiscal 2008 award of the BFT-1 contract triggered full coverage under the Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”), which are a set of specialized rules and standards that the U.S. government uses for determining costs on large, negotiated contracts. We advised the DCMA that we had previously addressed this issue with them in January 2008 and again provided them information in support of our view that the BFT-1 contract is subject to a CAS exemption for fixed price commercial contract line items (such as our mobile satellite transceivers and other hardware).

Index

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

In March 2012, we were awarded a new three-year indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“IDIQ”) BFT-1 sustainment contract with the U.S. Army to provide the same type of commercial equipment and services that we previously provided under the aforementioned BFT-1 contract. This new contract incorporates specific FAR Part 12 clauses, which specify that the equipment provided under the contract is commercial (as that term is defined in the FAR). We believe that the commercial designation in our new contract also applies to the original BFT-1 contract.

In November 2012, we received a letter from the DCMA which informed us that the DCAA had determined that both our original BFT-1 contract and our new BFT-1 sustainment contract (including our mobile satellite transceivers) are subject to commercial pricing and commercial clauses. The DCMA also noted that, since the cost portion of the referenced contracts was less than $50,000,000 , the contracts are only subject to modified CAS. As such, the DCMA withdrew its request for an initial CAS disclosure statement.

In December 2012, we attended an exit conference at which the DCAA presented its initial draft audit report and stated that it could not find any evidence that the contracting officer who signed the original BFT-1 contract had made a specific determination that Delivery Order No. 1 (which included our MT 2011F mobile satellite transceivers) was for commercial products. Accordingly, the DCAA draft report indicated that we were required to disclose current, accurate and complete cost or pricing data (as defined by FAR) and that we failed to do so. The DCAA indicated that it was recommending an $11,852,000 price adjustment (plus interest of $2,326,000 ) and that it would provide a copy of the recommended price adjustment to the contracting officer. We informed the DCAA that we believe their draft audit report and findings are erroneous and flawed. At the meeting, we advised the DCAA that although the original BFT-1 contract did not initially incorporate the FAR commercial clauses, the contract was modified in January 2008 to incorporate those clauses. In addition, we noted that the U.S. Army had previously determined, in July 2007, that the MT 2011F mobile satellite transceiver was a commercial item on a separate contract awarded to us. We also informed the DCAA auditors, who attended the meeting, of the November 2012 DCMA letter which indicated that our original BFT-1 contract and our new BFT-1 sustainment contract (including our mobile satellite transceivers) are subject to commercial pricing and commercial clauses. Irrespective of the commerciality determination, we demonstrated that the information that the DCAA stated had not been provided to the government was provided to the DCAA prior to August 2007. At the conclusion of the December 2012 exit conference, the DCAA indicated that it would revisit its draft report findings and recommendations and would inform us of its next steps.

In February 2013, the DCAA informed us that it was awaiting certain information from the DCMA and that it expected to issue a new draft report. Since no further information was provided to us by the DCAA at that time, we do not know what pricing or other adjustments, if any, it will recommend to the contracting officer.

U.S. government agencies, including the DCAA, routinely audit costs and performance on contracts, as well as accounting and general business practices. Any post award audit recommendation by a DCAA auditor is sent to the current contract officer who has the authority to determine whether or not to make a formal claim. If a claim is ultimately issued on this matter, we would vigorously contest it. We believe there is clear evidence that the equipment ordered on Delivery Order No. 1 is commercial under the FAR. If, however, it is ultimately determined that a cost or price adjustment for our BFT-1 contract is appropriate, we would be required to refund monies to the U.S. government, with interest. These amounts could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period that we believe it is probable that we are required to refund monies to the U.S. government. Ultimately, we do not believe this issue will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Other Proceedings

There are certain other pending and threatened legal actions, which arise in the normal course of business. Although the ultimate outcome of litigation is difficult to accurately predict, we believe that the outcome of these other pending and threatened actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Index



ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including but not limited to, information relating to our future performance and financial condition, plans and objectives of our management and our assumptions regarding such future performance, financial condition, and plans and objectives that involve certain significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors not under our control which may cause our actual results, future performance and financial condition, and achievement of our plans and objectives to be materially different from the results, performance or other expectations implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include the nature and timing of receipt of, and our performance on, new or existing orders that can cause significant fluctuations in net sales and operating results, the timing and funding of government contracts, adjustments to gross profits on long-term contracts, risks associated with international sales, rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, frequent new product announcements and enhancements, changing customer demands, changes in prevailing economic and political conditions, risks associated with our legal proceedings and other matters, risks associated with certain U.S. government investigations, risks associated with our BFT-1 contracts, including our ongoing negotiations with the U.S. Army regarding pricing for engineering services, program management and satellite network operations and post-award audit of our original BFT-1 contract, risks associated with our obligations under our revolving credit facility, and other factors described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

OVERVIEW

We design, develop, produce and market innovative products, systems and services for advanced communications solutions. We believe many of our solutions play a vital role in providing or enhancing communication capabilities when terrestrial communications infrastructure is unavailable, inefficient or too expensive. We conduct our business through three complementary operating segments: telecommunications transmission, RF microwave amplifiers and mobile data communications. We sell our products to a diverse customer base in the global commercial and government communications markets. We believe we are a leader in the market segments that we serve.

Our telecommunications transmission segment provides sophisticated equipment and systems that are used to enhance satellite transmission efficiency and that enable wireless communications in environments where terrestrial communications are unavailable, inefficient or too expensive. Our telecommunications transmission segment also operates our high-volume technology manufacturing center that can be utilized, in part, by our RF microwave amplifiers and mobile data communications segments and to a much lesser extent by third-party commercial customers who outsource a portion of their manufacturing to us. Accordingly, our telecommunications transmission segment’s operating results are impacted positively or negatively by the level of utilization of our high-volume manufacturing center.

Our RF microwave amplifiers segment designs, manufactures and markets traveling wave tube amplifiers and solid-state amplifiers, including high-power, broadband RF microwave amplifier products.

Our mobile data communications segment provides customers with integrated solutions, including mobile satellite transceivers and satellite network support, to enable global satellite-based communications when mobile, real-time, secure transmission is required for applications including logistics, support and battlefield command and control. The vast majority of sales in our mobile data communications segment have historically been derived from indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“IDIQ”) contracts to support two U.S. military programs known as Movement Tracking System (“MTS”) and Blue Force Tracking (“BFT-1”).

As further discussed in the below section entitled “BFT-1 Sustainment Activities” and as discussed in prior SEC filings, for fiscal 2013 and beyond, we expect revenues in this segment to be at materially lower levels than we achieved in fiscal 2012 because the BFT-1 program is in a sustainment mode. Also, during the six months ended January 31, 2013 , we completed a restructuring plan, which we adopted in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, to wind-down our mobile data communications segment's microsatellite product line. In connection with this decision, we recorded a net pre-tax restructuring charge of $0.6 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 , almost all of which is reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Index

Quarterly and period-to-period sales and operating results may be significantly affected by either short-term or long-term contracts with our customers. In addition, our gross profit is affected by a variety of factors, including the mix of products, systems and services sold, production efficiencies, estimates of warranty expense, price competition and general economic conditions. Our gross profit may also be affected by the impact of any cumulative adjustments to contracts that are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method.

Our contracts with the U.S. government can be terminated at any time and orders are subject to unpredictable funding, deployment and technology decisions by the U.S. government. Some of these contracts, such as the BFT-1 sustainment contract, are IDIQ contracts, and as such, the U.S. government is not obligated to purchase any equipment or services under these contracts. We have in the past experienced and we continue to expect significant fluctuations in sales and operating results from quarter-to-quarter and period-to-period. As such, comparisons between periods and our current results may not be indicative of a trend or future performance.

As further discussed below, under “Critical Accounting Policies, ” revenue from the sale of our products is generally recognized when the earnings process is complete, upon shipment or customer acceptance. Revenue from contracts relating to the design, development or manufacture of complex electronic equipment to a buyer’s specification or to provide services relating to the performance of such contracts is generally recognized in accordance with accounting standards that have been codified into Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-35, “Revenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts” (“ASC 605-35”). Revenue from contracts that contain multiple elements that are not accounted for under FASB ASC 605-35 is generally accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 605-25, “Revenue Recognition - Multiple Element Arrangements,” which, among other things, requires revenue associated with multiple element arrangements to be allocated to each element based on the relative selling price method.

BFT-1 Sustainment Activities

The vast majority of sales in our mobile data communications segment have historically come from sales relating to U.S. military programs known as the U.S. Army’s Movement Tracking System (“MTS”) program and the Force XXI Battle Command, Brigade and Below (“FBCB2”) command and control system's Blue Force Tracking (“BFT-1”) program. Our combined MTS and BFT-1 sales for the three and six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:



	Three months ended January 31,						Six months ended January 31,
	Net Sales (in millions)		Percentage of Mobile Data Communications Segment Net Sales		Percentage of Consolidated Net Sales		Net Sales (in millions)		Percentage of Mobile Data Communications Segment Net Sales		Percentage of Consolidated Net Sales
2013	$	6.9	82.1	%	9.2	%	$	16.9	81.3	%	10.2	%
2012	$	19.5	76.8	%	19.7	%	$	45.2	74.3	%	21.3	%

We have supplied mobile satellite transceivers, vehicle and command center application software, third-party produced ruggedized computers and satellite earth station network gateways and associated installation, training and maintenance to the MTS program which now operates under the auspices of the BFT-1 program under the direction of the Joint Battle Command Platform ("JBC-P") program office. Our MTS-related services also included the monitoring of satellite packet data networks. Effective July 1, 2012, we are no longer procuring satellite bandwidth for the U.S. Army.

In July 2010, a third party vendor was selected by the U.S. Army to develop a next generation BFT program known as BFT-2. The U.S. Army has stated that it expects to transition to BFT-2 as quickly as possible. We expect that future MTS and BFT-1 orders and related sales will largely be dependent on the ability and speed of the U.S. Army to transition to the BFT-2 system. As a result, we expect future fiscal year sales (and related operating income) from both of these programs to materially decline from historical levels.

We are currently providing BFT-1 sustainment services pursuant to a three-year IDIQ BFT-1 sustainment contract that we were awarded in March 2012. This three-year contract has a not-to-exceed value of $80.7 million and a base performance period that began April 1, 2012 and ends March 31, 2013. The contract provides for two twelve-month option periods exercisable by the U.S. Army and, except for $30.0 million of fixed intellectual property license ("IP license") fees (payable $10.0 million per year only if the options are exercised), the remaining contract value of $50.7 million is subject to finalization and downward negotiation.

Index

Under the terms of the BFT-1 sustainment contract, we agreed to perform certain satellite network and related engineering services (including program management) on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis. In addition, the contract allows the U.S. Army to purchase certain mobile satellite transceivers on a firm fixed-price basis. Specific terms and conditions related to the IP license are covered by a separate licensing agreement that provides for annual renewals, at the U.S. Army's option, for up to a five-year period, after which time the U.S. Army will have a limited non-exclusive right to use certain of our IP for no additional IP licensing fee. Payments of annual IP license fees beyond the base year are contingent upon the U.S. Army's exercise of optional performance periods.

In connection with the initial three-year $80.7 million IDIQ BFT-1 sustainment contract award, we received a funded order for the initial base year of $21.7 million, of which $10.0 million was designated for payment of the first year IP license fee and $11.7 million was designated for engineering services, program management and satellite network operations. Pricing for the engineering services, program management and satellite network operations has not yet been finalized. As such, this order is subject to downward adjustment; however, it is possible we can still receive additional funding. Our BFT-1 sustainment contract can be terminated by the government at any time, is not subject to automatic renewal and, the U.S. Army is not obligated to purchase any additional equipment or services under the BFT-1 sustainment contract.

On March 6, 2013, the U.S. Army notified us of its intention to exercise the first twelve-month option period for the BFT-1 sustainment contract; however, future orders are still subject to available funding. Although we expect the U.S. Army to obtain funding and place additional orders, it is possible that, given the pressures on the U.S. government to reduce its spending, it may not able be able to do so.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We consider certain accounting policies to be critical due to the estimation process involved in each.

Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts. Revenues and related costs from long-term contracts relating to the design, development or manufacture of complex electronic equipment to a buyer’s specification or to provide services relating to the performance of such contracts are recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts” (“ASC 605-35”). We primarily apply the percentage-of-completion accounting method and generally recognize revenue based on the relationship of total costs incurred to total projected costs, or, alternatively, based on output measures, such as units delivered or produced. Profits expected to be realized on such contracts are based on total estimated sales for the contract compared to total estimated costs, including warranty costs, at completion of the contract.

Direct costs (which include materials, labor and overhead) are charged to work-in-progress (including our contracts-in-progress) inventory or cost of sales. Indirect costs relating to long-term contracts, which include expenses such as general and administrative, are charged to expense as incurred and are not included in our work-in-process (including our contracts-in-progress) inventory or cost of sales. Total estimates are reviewed and revised periodically throughout the lives of the contracts, and adjustments to profits resulting from such revisions are made cumulative to the date of the change. Estimated losses on long-term contracts are recorded in the period in which the losses become evident. Long-term U.S. government cost-reimbursable type contracts are also specifically covered by FASB ASC 605-35.

We have been engaged in the production and delivery of goods and services on a continual basis under long-term contractual arrangements for many years. Historically, we have demonstrated an ability to accurately estimate total revenues and total expenses relating to our long-term contracts. However, there exist inherent risks and uncertainties in estimating revenues, expenses and progress toward completion, particularly on larger or longer-term contracts. If we do not accurately estimate the total sales, related costs and progress towards completion on such contracts, the estimated gross margins may be significantly impacted or losses may need to be recognized in future periods. Any such resulting changes in margins or contract losses could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, most government contracts have termination for convenience clauses that provide the customer with the right to terminate the contract at any time. Such terminations could impact the assumptions regarding total contract revenues and expenses utilized in recognizing profit under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Changes to these assumptions could materially impact our results of operations and financial condition. Historically, we have not experienced material terminations of our long-term contracts. We also address customer acceptance provisions in assessing our ability to perform our contractual obligations under long-term contracts. Our inability to perform on our long-term contracts could materially impact our results of operations and financial condition. Historically, we have been able to perform on our long-term contracts.

Index

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation . As discussed further in “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note (4) Stock-Based Compensation,” we issue stock-based awards to certain of our employees and our Board of Directors and we recognize related stock-based compensation for both equity and liability-classified stock-based awards in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

We have used and expect to continue to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to compute the estimated fair value of certain stock-based awards. The Black-Scholes option pricing model includes assumptions regarding dividend yield, expected volatility, expected option term and risk-free interest rates. The expected dividend yield is the expected annual dividend as a percentage of the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. We estimate expected volatility by considering the historical volatility of our stock, the implied volatility of publicly traded call options on our stock, the implied volatility from call options embedded in our 3.0% convertible senior notes and our expectations of volatility for the expected life of stock options. The expected option term is the number of years that we estimate that stock options will be outstanding prior to exercise based upon exercise patterns. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for an instrument which closely approximates the expected option term.

The assumptions used in computing the fair value of stock-based awards reflect our best estimates, but involve uncertainties relating to market and other conditions, many of which are outside of our control. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by recipients of stock-based awards. As a result, if other assumptions or estimates had been used, stock-based compensation expense that was recorded could have been materially different. Furthermore, if different assumptions are used in future periods, stock-based compensation expense could be materially impacted in the future.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . As of January 31, 2013, goodwill recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet aggregated $137.4 million (of which $107.8 million relates to our telecommunications transmission segment and $29.6 million relates to our RF microwave amplifiers segment). Our mobile data communications segment has no goodwill recorded. Each of our three operating segments constitutes a reporting unit and we must make various assumptions in determining their estimated fair values. We perform an annual impairment review in the first quarter of each fiscal year.

Index

As of January 31, 2013, taking into consideration our updated business outlook for fiscal 2013 and current difficult market conditions, we updated our future cash flow assumptions and calculated updated estimates of fair value using the income approach. In particular, we lowered our August 1, 2012 goodwill impairment test projections of future revenue and operating income growth and adjusted other factors (such as working capital and capital expenditures) for our telecommunications transmission and RF microwave amplifiers reporting units. After updating our assumptions and projections, we then calculated a present value of the respective cash flows to arrive at an estimate of fair value for each reporting unit under the income approach as of January 31, 2013. Consistent with our annual impairment test on August 1, 2012, we corroborated this value with updated estimates of fair value determined under the market approach. For each of the two reporting units with goodwill, the estimated fair value determined under the market approach exceeded our estimate of fair value under the income approach. Finally, we compared our estimates to our January 31, 2013 total public market capitalization and assessed the implied control premium. Based on the aforementioned, we concluded that the estimated fair value determined under the income approach for each of our reporting units, as of January 31, 2013, was reasonable. In each case, the estimated fair value exceeded the respective carrying value and, as such, we concluded that the goodwill assigned to our telecommunications transmission and RF microwave amplifiers reporting units, as of January 31, 2013, was not impaired. We also concluded that our telecommunications transmission reporting unit was currently not at risk of failing step one of the goodwill impairment test as prescribed under the ASC. However, we concluded that as of January 31, 2013, our RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit was at risk of failing step one of the goodwill impairment test.

As of January 31, 2013, we determined that our RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit had an estimated fair value in excess of its respective carrying value of at least 5.0%. The estimated fair value of our RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit is closely aligned with the ultimate amount of revenue and operating income that it achieves over the projected period. Our discounted cash flows, for goodwill impairment testing purposes, assumed that, through fiscal 2018, this reporting unit would achieve a compounded annual revenue growth rate of approximately 1.4% from its actual fiscal 2012 revenue of $102.5 million. Beyond fiscal 2018, we assumed a long-term revenue growth rate of 3.5% in the terminal year. As of January 31, 2013, we utilized a WACC of 12.0% for the RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit which reflected a 100 basis point increase from the WACC utilized in our August 1, 2012 goodwill impairment test. Given current challenging market conditions, we believe these modest long-term growth rates and the WACC are appropriate to use for our future cash flow assumptions due to the uncertainty that currently exists amongst our customer base. We also believe that it is possible that our actual revenue growth rates could be significantly higher due to a number of factors, including: (i) continued reliance by our customers on our advanced communications systems; (ii) the continued shift toward information-based, network-centric warfare; and (iii) the need for developing countries to upgrade their communication systems. If we do not at least meet the assumed revenue growth utilized in our January 31, 2013 goodwill impairment analysis, the RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit will likely fail step one of a goodwill impairment test in a future period. Modest changes in other key assumptions used in our January 31, 2013 impairment analysis may result in the requirement to proceed to step two of the goodwill impairment test in future periods. For example, keeping all other variables constant, a further 50 basis point increase in the WACC applied to the RF microwave amplifiers reporting unit or an increase to the RF microwave amplifiers carrying value of more than $5.0 million would likely result in a step one failure. If this reporting unit fails step one in the future, we would be required to perform step two of the goodwill impairment test. If we perform step two, up to $29.6 million of goodwill assigned to this reporting unit could be written off in the period that the impairment is triggered.

Index

During the second half of our fiscal 2013, because our goodwill impairment analysis is sensitive to the ultimate spending decisions by our global customers, we will continue to monitor key assumptions and other factors utilized in our January 31, 2013 interim goodwill impairment analysis. Currently, it remains difficult to project the ultimate impact of ongoing U.S. government budget constraints or to predict the spending plans of our international customers. In addition to facing weak local economies, we believe our international customers are being impacted by ripple effects of forthcoming U.S. government spending reductions. It is possible that, during the remainder of our fiscal 2013, business conditions (both in the U.S. and internationally) could further deteriorate and our current or prospective customers could materially postpone, reduce or even forgo purchases of our products and services to a greater extent than we currently anticipate. A significant decline in defense spending that is greater than we anticipate or a shift in funding priorities may also have a negative effect on future orders, sales, income and cash flows. If our assumptions and related estimates change in the future, or if we change our reporting structure or other events and circumstances change (e.g. such as a sustained decrease in the price of our common stock (considered on both absolute terms and relative to peers)), we may be required to record impairment charges in future periods. Any impairment charges that we may take in the future could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

In addition to the required goodwill impairment analysis, we also review the recoverability of our net intangibles with finite lives when an indicator of impairment exists. For the same reasons that we performed our interim goodwill impairment analysis as of January 31, 2013, we also assessed the recoverability of the net intangibles with finite lives recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, which aggregated $35.7 million (of which $20.0 million relates to our telecommunications transmission segment and $15.7 million relates to our RF microwave amplifiers segment). Based on our analysis of estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of these net intangibles with finite lives, we determined that their carrying values were recoverable as of January 31, 2013.

Provision for Warranty Obligations. We provide warranty coverage for most of our products, including products under long-term contracts, for a period of at least one year from the date of shipment. We record a liability for estimated warranty expense based on historical claims, product failure rates and other factors. Costs associated with some of our warranties that are provided under long-term contracts are incorporated into our estimates of total contract costs.

There exist inherent risks and uncertainties in estimating warranty expenses, particularly on larger or longer-term contracts. As such, if we do not accurately estimate our warranty costs, any changes to our original estimates could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

Accounting for Income Taxes. Our deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Our provision for income taxes is based on domestic (including federal and state) and international statutory income tax rates in the tax jurisdictions where we operate, permanent differences between financial reporting and tax reporting and available credits and incentives. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The U.S. federal government is our most significant income tax jurisdiction.

Significant judgment is required in determining income tax provisions and tax positions. We may be challenged upon review by the applicable taxing authority and positions taken by us may not be sustained. We recognize all or a portion of the benefit of income tax positions only when we have made a determination that it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, based upon the technical merits of the position and other factors. For tax positions that are determined as more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination, the tax benefit recognized is the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The development of reserves for income tax positions requires consideration of timing and judgments about tax issues and potential outcomes, and is a subjective critical estimate. In certain circumstances, the ultimate outcome of exposures and risks involves significant uncertainties. If actual outcomes differ materially from these estimates, they could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Provisions for Excess and Obsolete Inventory. We record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and future usage trends. Other factors may also influence our provision, including decisions to exit a product line, technological change and new product development. These factors could result in a change in the amount of excess and obsolete inventory on hand. Additionally, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated or overstated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory was overvalued, we would be required to recognize such costs in our financial statements at the time of such determination. Any such charge could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

Index

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We perform credit evaluations of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon customer payment history and current creditworthiness, as determined by our review of our customers’ current credit information. Generally, we will require cash in advance or payment secured by irrevocable letters of credit before an order is accepted from an international customer that we do not do business with regularly. In addition, we seek to obtain credit insurance for certain domestic and international customers.

We monitor collections and payments from our customers and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that we have identified. In light of ongoing tight credit market conditions, we continue to see requests from our customers for higher credit limits and longer payment terms. Because of our strong cash position and the nominal amount of interest we are earning on our cash and cash equivalents, we have, on a limited basis, approved certain customer requests.

We continue to monitor our accounts receivable credit portfolio and have not had any significant negative customer credit experiences to date. While our credit losses have historically been within our expectations of the allowances established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past, especially in light of the current global economic conditions and much tighter credit environment. Measurement of credit losses requires consideration of historical loss experience, including the need to adjust for current conditions, and judgments about the probable effects of relevant observable data, including present economic conditions such as delinquency rates and the financial health of specific customers. Changes to the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

Index

Business Outlook for Fiscal 2013

On December 6, 2012, when we last provided an updated business outlook, we were operating our business in a difficult business climate. At that time, we had expected that the U.S. government would make significant progress on its budget issues and that economic conditions would significantly improve. This did not happen and in recent months, we believe that business conditions have actually deteriorated. As such, we have updated our fiscal 2013 business outlook to reflect our assessment of current market conditions.

In March 2013, Congress failed to identify required spending reductions and the automatic sequestration of discretionary appropriations for various programs, including U.S. defense programs, which have been operating under continuing resolutions, went into effect. We believe the U.S. government's failure (both in late December 2012 and again in early March 2013) to timely resolve its budget issues has resulted in increased uncertainty amongst our global customer base. In fact, according to recent reports, the economies of several European countries unexpectedly contracted in the fourth quarter of calendar year 2012. At the same time, many of our international customers have also been affected by increasingly volatile political conditions in their respective countries. In aggregate, we believe these issues have resulted in many of our customers, particularly in our telecommunications transmission and RF microwave amplifiers segments, further reducing or delaying their spending for our products and services.

As disclosed in our prior filings with the SEC, we expect total consolidated net sales in fiscal 2013 to be significantly lower than the $425.1 million we achieved in fiscal 2012. Based on year-to-date and expected bookings, we now expect lower net sales in all three of our operating segments. While it remains difficult to predict the timing of order flow, based on our current backlog and anticipated order flow, we believe that consolidated net sales in our third quarter of fiscal 2013 will be lower than our most recent quarter and that our fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 will be near or at the peak of quarterly revenue for fiscal 2013. Sales in our mobile data communications segment in fiscal 2013, as compared to fiscal 2012, are expected to materially decrease due to lower expected sales to the U.S. Army for the BFT-1 (including MTS) program and because we are no longer offering microsatellite products to our customers (which accounted for $17.7 million of revenues in fiscal 2012). As a result of the lower consolidated net sales expected in fiscal 2013, we have taken, and continue to take, a number of cost reduction actions throughout our operating segments and we expect to continue to refine our cost structure going forward.

As of January 31, 2013 , we had cash and cash equivalents of $352.9 million . In February 2013, we completed our $250.0 million stock repurchase program; and as of March 6, 2013, we can repurchase an additional $45.1 million pursuant to our $50.0 million stock repurchase program that was approved by our Board of Directors in December 2012.

On March 7, 2013, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.275 per common share, payable on May 21, 2013 to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 19, 2013 . We expect to continue to execute on our quarterly dividend and stock repurchase programs and expect to supplement long-term organic growth opportunities by pursuing one or more acquisitions as appropriate opportunities arise. Despite challenging business conditions and notwithstanding our cost reduction efforts, we expect to continue to invest in research and development activities.

As noted above, our business outlook for fiscal 2013 is dependent, in part, on the outcome of ongoing U.S. government budget issues and the growth of the global economy. To date, we have experienced delays in customer orders and reductions in customer spending. Although we believe that the majority of our products and services are well aligned with national defense and other national priorities, we cannot precisely predict the outcome of sequestration or final budget deliberations, other actions of Congress, or the extent to which any reductions in spending may impact total funding and/or individual funding for programs in which we participate and the resulting impact to our business and financial outlook and actual results. If business conditions further deteriorate, or our current or prospective customers materially postpone, reduce or even forgo purchases of our products and services to a greater extent than we currently anticipate, our business outlook will be adversely affected.

Additional information related to our fiscal 2013 business outlook on certain income statement line items and recent operating segment bookings trends is included in the below section entitled “Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended January 31, 2013 and January 31, 2012 .”

Index

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2013 AND JANUARY 31, 2012

Net Sales. Consolidated net sales were $74.6 million and $99.1 million for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, representing a decrease of $24.5 million, or 24.7% . As further discussed below, the significant period-over-period decrease is due to lower net sales in all three of our operating segments.

Telecommunications transmission

Net sales in our telecommunications transmission segment were $45.8 million and $51.3 million for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, a decrease of $5.5 million, or 10.7% . This decrease reflects lower sales in our satellite earth station product line, partially offset by higher sales in our over-the-horizon microwave systems product line.

Sales of our satellite earth station products were significantly lower during the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended January 31, 2012 as a result of lower sales to both our international and U.S. government customers. As a result of challenging global business conditions, we believe that our customers have been tentative about placing orders. Although bookings for our satellite earth station products, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 (and related ending backlog) were higher as compared to the second quarter of our fiscal 2012 and the first quarter of our fiscal 2013, we believe that sales of these products in our most recent quarter were suppressed by uncertainty amongst our global customer base. We continue to believe that bookings for the remainder of fiscal 2013 (particularly in the third quarter) will be impacted by uncertainty that we believe is associated with: (i) forthcoming U.S. government spending reductions; (ii) the recent unexpected contraction of the economies of several European countries; and (iii) increasingly volatile political conditions in various international countries. As such, based on our current backlog and anticipated order flow, we expect sales of satellite earth station products in fiscal 2013 to be lower than the level we achieved in fiscal 2012.

Sales of our over-the-horizon microwave systems increased during the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended January 31, 2012 . Sales of our over-the-horizon microwave systems during the quarter primarily reflect our increased level of performance on our ongoing three-year $55.0 million contract from a domestic prime contractor to design and furnish a telecommunications system for use in a North African government's communications network. We continue to negotiate with a prime contractor to obtain additional business with our North African country end-customer and we expect that our efforts will ultimately result in the award of one or more large contracts. Given overall market conditions, it is difficult to predict the timing of award of these potential contracts; as such, our fiscal 2013 business outlook does not include any associated revenues. Sales of our over-the-horizon microwave systems during the three months ended January 31, 2012 include sales related to our Modular Transportable Troposcatter System ("MTTS") and we did not have any sales of these products during our most recent quarter. Although we still expect to ultimately receive additional MTTS orders, as a result of pressures on the U.S. defense budget, the timing of these orders is difficult to predict and we no longer expect to ship any during the remainder of fiscal 2013. Based on the timing of our expected performance on our North African contract and other contracts that are currently in our backlog, revenues from our over-the-horizon microwave systems products are expected to significantly decrease during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 before increasing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Based on our current backlog and the anticipated receipt of other orders, we expect net sales in our over-the-horizon microwave product line, in fiscal 2013, to be higher than the level we achieved in fiscal 2012.

Our telecommunications transmission segment represented 61.4% of consolidated net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 , as compared to 51.8% for the three months ended January 31, 2012 . Bookings, sales and profitability in our telecommunications transmission segment can fluctuate from period-to-period due to many factors, including the book and ship nature of our satellite earth station product business, the current adverse conditions in the global economy and the timing of, and our related performance on, contracts from the U.S. government and international customers.

RF microwave amplifiers

Net sales in our RF microwave amplifiers segment were $20.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2013 , as compared to $22.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2012 , a decrease of $2.0 million, or 8.9% . The decline in sales occurred in both our solid state high-power and traveling wave tube amplifier product lines.

Index

In the past few months, overall market conditions for our RF microwave amplifiers segment have become significantly more challenging. Many of our customers have reduced or delayed their spending for our products and services. Bookings in our RF microwave amplifiers segment for the three months ended January 31, 2013 were significantly lower than the level we achieved for the three months ended January 31, 2012 . Based on our current backlog and the anticipated timing of orders we expect to receive, net sales in this segment, in fiscal 2013 , are expected to be lower than the level we achieved in fiscal 2012 and sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 are expected to decline from the level we achieved in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Although we are not anticipating any meaningful improvement in the overall economy, based on the timing of expected order flow, sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 for this segment will be near or at the peak of quarterly revenue for fiscal 2013. If we do not receive expected orders, we may not be able to achieve our expected levels of sales in fiscal 2013 for this product line.

Our RF microwave amplifiers segment represented 27.3% of consolidated net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to 22.6% for the three months ended January 31, 2012 . Bookings, sales and profitability in our RF microwave amplifiers segment can fluctuate from period-to-period due to many factors, including the challenging business conditions, U.S. and international military budget constraints that currently exist, and the timing of, and our related performance on, contracts from the U.S. government and international customers.

Mobile data communications

Net sales in our mobile data communications segment were $8.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $25.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2012 , a substantial decrease of $17.0 million, or 66.9% . This anticipated decrease is attributable to a substantial decline in MTS and BFT-1 sales to the U.S. Army, and our fiscal 2012 decision to wind-down our microsatellite product line.

Aggregate sales to the U.S. Army for the MTS and BFT-1 programs during the three months ended January 31, 2013 were $6.9 million , or 82.1% of our mobile data communications segment's sales, as compared to $19.5 million , or 76.8% , during the three months ended January 31, 2012 . MTS and BFT-1 program sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 reflect lower revenues resulting from the U.S. Army's July 2010 decision to award a third party a contract for the next-generation BFT-2 network and its related decision to combine the MTS program with the BFT-1 program. Sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 include $2.5 million of revenue related to our $10.0 million annual intellectual property license ("IP license") fee that we collected in fiscal 2012, pursuant to our three-year BFT-1 IDIQ sustainment contract with the U.S. Army. Sales for the three months ended January 31, 2012 include sales related to MTS and BFT-1 satellite transponder capacity to the U.S. Army, which we are no longer providing, as well as shipments of MTS and BFT-1 mobile satellite transceivers for which we currently have no additional orders in our backlog.

As discussed in our prior filings with the SEC, we completed our restructuring plan to wind-down our microsatellite product line and no longer sell microsatellite products. We expect no additional microsatellite product revenue to be generated for the remainder of fiscal 2013. Microsatellite product revenues for the three months ended January 31, 2012 were $4.4 million .

As discussed in the above section entitled “ BFT-1 Sustainment Activities, ” we currently anticipate that the majority of future sales in our mobile data communications segment will be generated from sales of MTS and BFT-1 equipment and services pursuant to our three-year BFT-1 IDIQ sustainment contract. Our 2013 business outlook assumes that the U.S. Army will exercise the optional performance period of the BFT-1 sustainment contract, beginning April 1, 2013, and that it will place additional funded orders, including the optional renewal of our IP license. Based on the timing of our performance on orders currently in our backlog and additional orders we expect to receive, we expect that sales in our mobile data communications segment will be materially lower in fiscal 2013 as compared to the level we achieved in fiscal 2012 .

Our mobile data communications segment represented 11.3% of consolidated net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to 25.6% for the three months ended January 31, 2012 . Bookings, sales and profitability in our mobile data communications segment can fluctuate dramatically from period-to-period due to many factors, including unpredictable funding, deployment and technology decisions by the U.S. government. As such, period-to-period comparisons of our results may not be indicative of a trend or future performance.

Geography and Customer Type

Sales to the U.S. government (including sales to prime contractors of the U.S. government) represented 32.8% and 46.5% of consolidated net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. International sales (which include sales to U.S. companies for inclusion in products that are sold to international customers) represented 54.3% and 41.4% of consolidated net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. Domestic commercial sales represented 12.9% and 12.1% of consolidated net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

Index

The lower percentage of consolidated net sales to the U.S. government during the three months ended January 31, 2013 primarily reflects substantially lower sales to the U.S. Army for the MTS and BFT-1 programs and the wind-down of our microsatellite product line, as discussed above.

Gross Profit. Gross profit was $32.2 million and $41.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, representing a decrease of $9.2 million, which was primarily driven by the significant decline in consolidated net sales.

Gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, increased from 41.8% for the three months ended January 31, 2012 to 43.2% for the three months ended January 31, 2013 . Gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, during the three months ended January 31, 2013 benefited from a significantly higher percentage of consolidated net sales occurring in our telecommunications transmission segment and an overall better mix of products and services in both our RF microwave amplifiers and mobile data communications segments. Gross profit, as a percentage of related segment sales, is further discussed below.

Our telecommunications transmission segment's gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 , was lower than the percentage achieved for the three months ended January 31, 2012 . This decrease was primarily the result of lower sales of our satellite earth station products and changes in overall product mix. Based on the nature and type of orders that are currently in our backlog and the anticipated lower level of telecommunications transmission segment net sales in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012, we expect the gross profit percentage in our telecommunications transmission segment, in fiscal 2013 , to be lower than the percentage this segment achieved in fiscal 2012 .

Our RF microwave amplifiers segment experienced a slightly higher gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended January 31, 2012 . This increase is primarily attributable to an improvement in overall product mix. Based on the nature and type of orders that are currently in our backlog and anticipated orders we expect to receive, we expect gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, in fiscal 2013 , to be slightly lower than the percentage this segment achieved in fiscal 2012 .

Our mobile data communications segment's gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 was significantly higher as compared to the three months ended January 31, 2012 , primarily due to changes in overall product mix, including the absence of lower margin satellite transponder capacity, which we are no longer providing to the U.S. Army. Gross profit for the three months ended January 31, 2013 reflects the benefit of $2.5 million of revenue that we recorded related to our $10.0 million annual IP license fee pursuant to our three-year BFT-1 IDIQ sustainment contract with the U.S. Army. Looking forward, although we expect it to be higher than historical percentages due to our anticipation of recurring annual IP license fees, the gross profit percentage expected in this segment is difficult to quantify because, as discussed in the above section entitled “ BFT-1 Sustainment Activities, ” the pricing and terms for certain orders received from the U.S. Army has not yet been finalized and the U.S. Army is not obligated to order any additional products or services. Significant period-to-period fluctuations in our gross profit percentage and gross margins can occur in our mobile data communications segment as a result of the nature, timing and mix of actual deliveries which are primarily driven by the U.S. Army's requirements.

Included in consolidated cost of sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 are provisions for excess and obsolete inventory of $0.6 million and $1.0 million , respectively. As discussed in our “Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies - Provisions for Excess and Obsolete Inventory,” we regularly review our inventory and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and projected usage assumptions.

It is always difficult to predict sales and product mix for each individual segment; as such, it is difficult to estimate consolidated gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, in future periods. Nevertheless, based on orders currently in our backlog and orders we expect to receive, we anticipate that our consolidated gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, will be slightly higher in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 .

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses . Selling, general and administrative expenses were $15.4 million and $19.6 million for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, representing a decrease of $4.2 million, or 21.4% . As a percentage of consolidated net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were 20.6% and 19.8% for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

Index

The decrease in our selling, general and administrative expenses from was primarily due to overall lower spending associated with the significantly lower level of consolidated net sales during the three months ended January 31, 2013 . In addition, our selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended January 31, 2013 includes a benefit of $0.9 million relating to a change in the fair value of a contingent earn-out liability associated with our acquisition of Stampede Technologies, Inc. (discussed further in “ Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (9) Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities" in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q) and a benefit of $0.2 million relating to the reversal of previously accrued costs associated with the wind-down of our microsatellite product line that were lower than expected. Excluding the aforementioned items, selling, general and administrative expenses, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 , would have been 22.1% of consolidated net sales.

Selling, general and administrative expenses during the three months ended January 31, 2013 include $0.3 million of legal costs and professional fees associated with the legal proceedings and other matters which are specifically discussed in “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (20) Legal Proceedings and Other Matters,” in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q.

Amortization of stock-based compensation expense recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $0.6 million in the three months ended January 31, 2013 from $0.8 million in the three months ended January 31, 2012 .

Given the absence of fair market value adjustments and cost reversals (both of which are discussed above) as well as the impact of the timing of certain planned operating expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses, in both the third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 , are expected to be higher than the amount we reported in the second quarter. Nevertheless, selling, general and administrative expenses, in dollars, are expected to significantly decrease in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 . As a percentage of consolidated net sales, we expect selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2013 to be comparable to fiscal 2012 . As previously discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as well as our prior filings with the SEC, we have taken and continue to take cost reduction actions in all of our reportable operating segments.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses were $9.3 million and $9.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, representing a decrease of $0.1 million, or 1.1% .

For the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , research and development expenses of $7.1 million and $7.3 million, respectively, related to our telecommunications transmission segment, and $2.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, related to our RF microwave amplifiers segment. Research and development expenses in our mobile data communications segment for the three months ended January 31, 2013 were nominal as compared to the $0.2 million we spent during the three months ended January 31, 2012. The remaining research and development expenses relate to the amortization of stock-based compensation expense which is not allocated to our three operating segments. Amortization of stock-based compensation expense recorded as research and development expenses for both the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $0.1 million .

As a percentage of consolidated net sales, research and development expenses were 12.5% and 9.5% for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. The increase in research and development expenses, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, is attributable to the significantly lower level of consolidated net sales during the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended January 31, 2012 .

Despite challenging business conditions and notwithstanding our cost reduction efforts, we expect to continue to invest in research and development activities. As such, we expect research and development expenses, in dollars, for fiscal 2013 to be comparable to the amount we invested during fiscal 2012 and, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, to increase.

As an investment for the future, we are continually enhancing our existing products and developing new products and technologies. Whenever possible, we seek customer funding for research and development to adapt our products to specialized customer requirements. During the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , customers reimbursed us $0.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which is not reflected in the reported research and development expenses, but is included in net sales with the related costs included in cost of sales.

Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization relating to intangible assets with finite lives was $1.6 million and $1.7 million in the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. The slight decrease is attributable to certain intangible assets that were fully amortized in fiscal 2012.

Index

Operating Income. Operating income for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $5.9 million, or 7.9% of consolidated net sales, and $10.7 million, or 10.8% of consolidated net sales, respectively.

Excluding the benefit to operating income associated with the previously discussed change in fair value of the Stampede contingent earn-out liability and the reversal of previously accrued costs associated with the wind-down of our microsatellite product line, operating income approximated $4.8 million, or 6.4% of consolidated net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2013 . The decline in operating income (both in dollars and as a percentage of consolidated net sales) is attributable to the overall lower level of consolidated net sales we achieved during the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended January 31, 2012 , offset, in part, by lower operating expenses. Operating income, by segment, is discussed further below.

Operating income in our telecommunications transmission segment was $5.5 million, or 12.0% of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 , as compared to $8.3 million, or 16.2% of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2012 . Excluding the previously discussed change in fair value of the Stampede contingent earn-out liability, operating income, as a percentage of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 was 10.0% . The decrease, from 16.2% to 10.0% , was primarily due to lower net sales activity and lower gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, as discussed above. Our operating income (both in dollars and as a percentage of related net sales) in this segment is expected to significantly decline during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 before increasing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. This expected fluctuation is largely driven by the timing of expected performance on our over-the-horizon microwave system contracts, most of which are currently in our backlog.

Our RF microwave amplifiers segment generated operating income of $0.6 million, or 2.9% of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $1.2 million, or 5.4% of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2012 . This decrease in operating income, both in dollars and as a percentage of related net sales, is primarily due to lower net sales and higher research and development expenses, as discussed above. Given the timing of expected RF microwave amplifiers segment orders and related sales for the remainder of fiscal 2013, operating income in this segment is expected to approximate break-even in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 before significantly increasing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.

Our mobile data communications segment generated operating income of $3.0 million, or 35.7% of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $4.4 million, or 17.3% of related net sales, for the three months ended January 31, 2012 . The decrease in operating income, in dollars, and increase in operating income, as a percentage of related net sales, was primarily driven by overall changes in this segment's sales and product mix, as discussed above. Operating income in this segment during the three months ended January 31, 2013 was largely driven by the $2.5 million of IP license fee revenue and the reversal of $0.2 million of previously accrued costs associated with the wind-down of our microsatellite product line, as further discussed above.

Unallocated operating expenses were $3.2 million for both the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 . Unallocated operating expenses in the three months ended January 31, 2013 includes some of the legal costs and professional fees associated with certain legal proceedings and other matters, which are discussed in “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (20) Legal Proceedings and Other Matters” in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q.

Amortization of stock-based compensation expense, which is included in unallocated operating expenses, was $0.8 million in the three months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $1.0 million in the three months ended January 31, 2012 .

Because the pricing for various products and services we have agreed to provide to the U.S. Army has not yet been finalized and because business conditions are challenging, it remains difficult to predict our overall consolidated sales product mix, making it difficult to precisely estimate future operating margins as a percentage of related net sales. Nevertheless, based on the orders currently in our backlog and orders we expect to receive, our consolidated operating income, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, for fiscal 2013 is now expected to approximate 10.0%. As discussed above, given the timing of expected shipments in our RF microwave amplifiers segment and expected performance in our telecommunications transmission segment, we do expect that consolidated operating income (both in dollars and as a percentage of net sales) will decline in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 as compared to the level we just achieved, before increasing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $2.0 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, and primarily reflects interest on our 3.0% convertible notes.

Index

Interest Income and Other. Interest income and other for the three months ended January 31, 2013 was $0.3 million as compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2012 . Interest income and other for both periods is primarily generated from interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents. All of our available cash and cash equivalents are currently invested in bank deposits, money market mutual funds, certificates of deposit, and short-term U.S. Treasury securities which, at this time, are currently yielding a blended annual interest rate of approximately 0.40%.

Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes was $1.9 million and $3.1 million for the three months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. Our effective tax rate was 44.1% for the three months ended January 31, 2013 compared to 34.6% for the three months ended January 31, 2012 .

Our effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, 2013 reflects a net discrete tax expense of approximately $0.4 million, of which $0.7 million relates to the establishment of a valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets of one of our foreign subsidiaries, offset, in part, by a $0.3 million discrete tax benefit related to the passage of legislation that included the retroactive extension of the federal research and experimentation credit from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, 2012 reflects a net discrete tax benefit of less than $0.1 million. Excluding these discrete tax items in both periods, our effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, 2013 would have been 35.5% as compared to 35.0% for the three months ended January 31, 2012. The increase from 35.0% to 35.5% is principally attributable to the expected product and geographical mix changes reflected in our updated fiscal 2013 business outlook. Fiscal 2013 is also expected to benefit from the recording of twelve months of federal research and experimentation credits as compared to five months in fiscal 2012, as the federal research and experimentation credit had previously expired on December 31, 2011. Excluding the impact of any discrete tax items, our fiscal 2013 estimated effective tax rate is expected to approximate 35.5%.

Our federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2010 through 2012 are subject to potential future IRS audit. Future tax assessments or settlements could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2013 AND JANUARY 31, 2012

Net Sales. Consolidated net sales were $165.5 million and $212.5 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, representing a decrease of $47.0 million, or 22.1% . As further discussed below, the significant period-over-period decrease primarily reflects lower net sales in our mobile data communications segment and, to a lesser extent, in our telecommunications transmission segment. Sales in our RF microwave amplifiers segment increased during this comparative period.

Telecommunications transmission

Net sales in our telecommunications transmission segment were $99.1 million and $108.1 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, a decrease of $9.0 million, or 8.3% . This decrease reflects lower sales in our satellite earth station product line, partially offset by higher sales in our over-the-horizon microwave systems product line.

Sales of our satellite earth station products were significantly lower during the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the six months ended January 31, 2012 , as a result of lower sales to both our international and U.S government customers. As a result of challenging global business conditions, we believe that our customers have been tentative about placing orders. Although bookings for our satellite earth station products, for the three months ended January 31, 2013 (and related ending backlog) were higher as compared to both the second quarter of our fiscal 2012 and the first quarter of our fiscal 2013, we believe that sales of these products in our most recent quarter were suppressed by uncertainty amongst our global customer base. We continue to believe that bookings for the remainder of fiscal 2013 (particularly in the third quarter) will be impacted by uncertainty that we believe is associated with: (i) forthcoming U.S. government spending reductions; (ii) the recent unexpected contraction of the economies of several European countries; and (iii) increasingly volatile political conditions in various international countries. As such, based on our current backlog and anticipated order flow, we expect sales of satellite earth station products in fiscal 2013 to be lower than the level we achieved in fiscal 2012.

Index

Sales of our over-the-horizon microwave systems increased during the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the six months ended January 31, 2012 . Sales of our over-the-horizon microwave systems during the six months ended January 31, 2013 include sales related to our performance on our three-year $55.0 million contract from a domestic prime contractor to design and furnish a telecommunications system for use in a North African government's communications network, as well as shipments related to orders for our Modular Transportable Troposcatter System ("MTTS") for end-use by the U.S. Army. We continue to negotiate with a prime contractor to obtain additional business with our North African country end-customer and we expect that our efforts will ultimately result in the award of one or more large contracts. Given overall market conditions, it is difficult to predict the timing of these potential contracts; as such, our fiscal 2013 business outlook does not include any associated revenues. Sales of our over-the-horizon microwave systems during the three months ended January 31, 2012 include sales related to our Modular Transportable Troposcatter System ("MTTS") and we did not have any sales of these products during our most recent quarter. Although we still expect to ultimately receive additional MTTS orders, as a result of pressures on the U.S. defense budget, the timing of these orders is difficult to predict and we no longer expect to ship any during the remainder of fiscal 2013. Based on the timing of our expected performance on our North African contract and other contracts that are currently in our backlog, revenues from our over-the-horizon microwave systems products are expected to significantly decrease during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 before increasing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Based on our current backlog and the anticipated receipt of other orders, we expect net sales in our over-the-horizon product line, in fiscal 2013, to be higher than the level we achieved in fiscal 2012.

Our telecommunications transmission segment represented 59.9% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to 50.9% for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . Bookings, sales and profitability in our telecommunications transmission segment can fluctuate from period-to-period due to many factors, including the book and ship nature of our satellite earth station product business, the current adverse conditions in the global economy and the timing of, and our related performance on, contracts from the U.S. government and international customers.

RF microwave amplifiers

Net sales in our RF microwave amplifiers segment were $45.7 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 , as compared to $43.6 million for the six months ended January 31, 2012 , an increase of $2.1 million, or 4.8% . This increase primarily reflects higher sales of our traveling wave tube amplifiers, offset, in part, by lower sales of our solid state high-power amplifiers.

In the past few months, overall market conditions for our RF microwave amplifiers segment have become significantly more challenging. Many of our customers have reduced or delayed their spending for our products and services. Bookings in our RF microwave amplifiers segment for the six months ended January 31, 2013 were significantly lower than the level we achieved for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . Based on our current backlog and the anticipated timing of orders we expect to receive, net sales in this segment, in fiscal 2013 , are expected to be lower than the level we achieved in fiscal 2012 and sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 are expected to decline from the level we achieved in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Although we are not anticipating any meaningful improvement in the overall economy, based on the timing of expected order flow, sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 for this segment will be near or at the peak of quarterly revenue for fiscal 2013. If we do not receive expected orders, we may not be able to achieve our expected levels of sales in fiscal 2013 for this product line.

Our RF microwave amplifiers segment represented 27.6% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to 20.5% for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . Bookings, sales and profitability in our RF microwave amplifiers segment can fluctuate from period-to-period due to many factors, including the challenging business conditions and U.S. and international military budget constraints that currently exist, and the timing of, and our related performance on, contracts from the U.S. government and international customers.

Mobile data communications

Net sales in our mobile data communications segment were $20.8 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $ 60.8 million for the six months ended January 31, 2012 , a substantial decrease of $40.0 million, or 65.8% . This anticipated decrease is attributable to a substantial decline in MTS and BFT-1 sales to the U.S. Army and our fiscal 2012 decision to wind-down our microsatellite product line.

Index

Aggregate sales to the U.S. Army for the MTS and BFT-1 programs during the six months ended January 31, 2013 were $16.9 million , or 81.3% of our mobile data communications segment's sales, as compared to $45.2 million , or 74.3% , during the six months ended January 31, 2012 . MTS and BFT-1 program sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 reflect lower revenues resulting from the U.S. Army's July 2010 decision to award a third party a contract for the next-generation BFT-2 network and its related decision to combine the MTS program with the BFT-1 program. Sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 include $5.0 million of revenue related to our $10.0 million annual IP license fee that we collected in fiscal 2012, pursuant to our three-year BFT-1 IDIQ sustainment contract with the U.S. Army. MTS and BFT-1 program sales for the six months ended January 31, 2012 include a benefit of $5.6 million related to an award for increased funding associated with the finalization of pricing for certain MTS and BFT-1 orders received in fiscal 2011, and also include sales relating to MTS and BFT-1 satellite transponder capacity to the U.S. Army, which we are no longer providing. Sales in both the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 include shipments of MTS and BFT-1 mobile satellite transceivers for which we currently have no additional orders in our backlog.

As discussed in prior filings with the SEC, we completed our restructuring plan to wind-down our microsatellite product line and no longer sell microsatellite products. We expect no additional microsatellite product revenue to be generated for the remainder of fiscal 2013. Microsatellite product revenues for the six months ended January 31, 2012 were $12.0 million .

Our mobile data communications segment represented 12.6% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to 28.6% for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . Bookings, sales and profitability in our mobile data communications segment can fluctuate dramatically from period-to-period due to many factors, including unpredictable funding, deployment and technology decisions by the U.S. government. As such, period-to-period comparisons of our results may not be indicative of a trend or future performance.

Geography and Customer Type

Sales to the U.S. government (including sales to prime contractors of the U.S. government) represented 38.6% and 47.5% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. International sales (which include sales to U.S. companies for inclusion in products that are sold to international customers) represented 48.1% and 40.0% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. Domestic commercial sales represented 13.3% and 12.5% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

The lower percentage of consolidated net sales to the U.S. government during the six months ended January 31, 2013 primarily reflects substantially lower sales to the U.S. Army for the MTS and BFT-1 programs and the wind-down of our microsatellite product line, as discussed above.

Gross Profit. Gross profit was $74.0 million and $ 92.7 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, representing a decrease of $18.7 million, which was primarily driven by the significant decline in consolidated net sales.

Our gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, increased from 43.6% for the six months ended January 31, 2012 to 44.7% for the six months ended January 31, 2013 . Gross profit for the six months ended January 31, 2012 includes a $5.6 million benefit associated with the finalization of pricing for certain MTS and BFT-1 orders. Excluding this benefit, gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2012 would have been 42.1% as compared to 44.7% for the six months ended January 31, 2013 . Gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales during the six months ended January 31, 2013 benefited from a higher percentage of consolidated net sales occurring in our telecommunications transmission segment and an overall better mix of products and services in both our RF microwave amplifiers and mobile data communications segments. Gross profit, as a percentage of related segment sales, is further discussed below.

Index

Our telecommunications transmission segment's gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2013 , was lower than the percentage achieved for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . This decrease was primarily the result of lower sales of our satellite earth station products and changes in overall product mix. Based on the nature and type of orders that are currently in our backlog and the anticipated lower level of telecommunications transmission segment net sales in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012, we expect the gross profit percentage in our telecommunications transmission segment, in fiscal 2013 , to be lower than the percentage this segment achieved in fiscal 2012 .

Our RF microwave amplifiers segment experienced a higher gross profit, both in dollars and as a percentage of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the six months ended January 31, 2012 . This increase is primarily attributable to an improvement in overall product mix. Based on the nature and type of orders that are currently in our backlog and anticipated orders we expect to receive, we expect gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, in fiscal 2013 , to be slightly lower than the percentage this segment achieved in fiscal 2012 .

Our mobile data communications segment's gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2013 was significantly higher as compared to the six months ended January 31, 2012 , primarily due to changes in overall product mix, including the absence of lower margin satellite transponder capacity, which we are no longer providing to the U.S. Army. Gross profit for the six months ended January 31, 2013 reflects the benefit of $5.0 million of revenue that we recorded related to our $10.0 million annual IP license fee, pursuant to our three-year BFT-1 IDIQ sustainment contract with the U.S. Army. Our gross profit in this segment, during the six months ended January 31, 2012 , benefited by approximately $5.6 million related to the aforementioned finalization of pricing for certain MTS and BFT-1 orders. Looking forward, although we expect it to be higher than historical percentages due to our anticipation of recurring annual IP license fees, the gross profit percentage expected in this segment is difficult to quantify because, as discussed in the above section entitled “ BFT-1 Sustainment Activities, ” the pricing and terms for certain orders received from the U.S. Army has not yet been finalized and the U.S. Army is not obligated to order any additional products or services. Significant period-to-period fluctuations in our gross profit percentage and gross margins can occur in our mobile data communications segment as a result of the nature, timing and mix of actual deliveries which are primarily driven by the U.S. Army's requirements.

Included in consolidated cost of sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 are provisions for excess and obsolete inventory of $1.3 million and $1.6 million , respectively. As discussed in our “Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies - Provisions for Excess and Obsolete Inventory,” we regularly review our inventory and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and projected usage assumptions.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses . Selling, general and administrative expenses were $32.2 million and $ 43.7 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, representing a decrease of $11.5 million, or 26.3% . As a percentage of consolidated net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were 19.5% and 20.6% for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

The decrease in our selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to overall lower spending associated with the significantly lower level of consolidated net sales during the six months ended January 31, 2013 and a net benefit of $2.7 million consisting of $3.3 million of benefit relating to a change in the fair value of a contingent earn-out liability associated with our acquisition of Stampede Technologies, Inc. (discussed further in “ Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (9) Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities" in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q) and $0.6 million of costs associated with the wind-down of our microsatellite product line. Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended January 31, 2012 reflect $2.6 million of professional fees associated with a withdrawn contested proxy solicitation related to our fiscal 2011 annual meeting of stockholders. Excluding all of the aforementioned amounts in each respective period, selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 would have been 21.1% and 19.3% , respectively.

Selling, general and administrative expenses during the six months ended January 31, 2013 include $0.4 million of legal costs and professional fees associated with legal proceedings and other matters which are specifically discussed in “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (20) Legal Proceedings and Other Matters,” in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q.

Index

Amortization of stock-based compensation expense recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $1.2 million in the six months ended January 31, 2013 from $1.4 million in the six months ended January 31, 2012 .

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses were $19.3 million and $19.1 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, representing an increase of $0.2 million, or 1.0% .

For the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , research and development expenses of $14.6 million and $14.5 million, respectively, related to our telecommunications transmission segment, and $4.5 million and $3.8 million, respectively, related to our RF microwave amplifiers segment, respectively. Research and development expenses in our mobile data communications segment for the six months ended January 31, 2013 were nominal as compared to the $0.5 million we spent during the six months ended January 31, 2012 . The remaining research and development expenses relate to the amortization of stock-based compensation expense, which is not allocated to our three operating segments. Amortization of stock-based compensation expense recorded as research and development expenses was $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

As a percentage of consolidated net sales, research and development expenses were 11.7% and 9.0% for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. The increase in research and development expenses, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, is attributable to the significantly lower level of consolidated net sales during the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the six months ended January 31, 2012 .

As an investment for the future, we are continually enhancing our existing products and developing new products and technologies. Whenever possible, we seek customer funding for research and development to adapt our products to specialized customer requirements. During the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , customers reimbursed us $2.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively, which is not reflected in the reported research and development expenses, but is included in net sales with the related costs included in cost of sales.

Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization relating to intangible assets with finite lives was $3.2 million and $ 3.4 million in the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. The slight decrease is attributable to certain intangible assets that were fully amortized in fiscal 2012.

Operating Income. Operating income for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $19.3 million, or 11.7% of consolidated net sales, and $26.4 million, or 12.4% of consolidated net sales, respectively.

Excluding the net benefit to operating income associated with the previously discussed change in fair value of the Stampede contingent earn-out liability and the costs associated with the wind-down of our microsatellite product line, operating income approximated $16.6 million, or 10.0% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2013 . Excluding the net benefit to operating income associated with the previously discussed finalization of pricing and increased funding for certain MTS and BFT-1 orders and the professional fees associated with the withdrawn contested proxy solicitation, operating income approximated $23.4 million, or 11.3% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . The decline in operating income (both in dollars and as a percentage of consolidated net sales) is attributable to the significantly lower level of consolidated net sales we achieved during the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to the six months ended January 31, 2012 . Operating income, by segment, is discussed further below.

Index

Operating income in our telecommunications transmission segment was $17.8 million, or 18.0% of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2013 , as compared to $21.4 million, or 19.8% of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . Excluding the previously discussed change in fair value of the Stampede contingent earn-out liability, operating income, as a percentage of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2013 was 14.6% . The decrease, from 19.8% to 14.6% , was primarily due to lower net sales activity and lower gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, as discussed above. Our operating income (both in dollars and as a percentage of related net sales) in this segment is expected to significantly decline during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 before increasing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. This expected fluctuation is largely driven by the timing of expected performance on our over-the-horizon microwave system contracts, most of which are currently in our backlog.

Our RF microwave amplifiers segment generated operating income of $2.4 million, or 5.3% of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $1.5 million, or 3.4% of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . This increase in operating income, both in dollars and as a percentage of related net sales, is primarily due to higher net sales and a higher gross profit, as a percentage of related net sales, partially offset by higher research and development expenses, as discussed above. Given the timing of expected RF microwave amplifiers segment orders and related sales for the remainder of fiscal 2013, operating income in this segment is expected to approximate break-even in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 before significantly increasing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.

Our mobile data communications segment generated operating income of $6.5 million, or 31.3% of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $ 13.8 million, or 22.7% of related net sales, for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . The decrease in operating income, in dollars, and increase in operating income, as a percentage of related net sales, was primarily driven by overall changes in this segment's sales and product mix, as discussed above. Operating income in this segment for the six months ended January 31, 2013 was largely driven by the $5.0 million of IP license fee revenue offset, in part, by a $0.6 million net pre-tax restructuring charge associated with the wind-down of our microsatellite product line, as further discussed above. Operating income in the six months ended January 31, 2012 reflects a benefit of $5.6 million related the finalization of pricing for certain MTS and BFT-1 orders.

Unallocated operating expenses were $7.3 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $10.2 million for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . Excluding the aforementioned $2.6 million of costs recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses, unallocated operating expenses were $ 7.6 million in the six months ended January 31, 2012 . The decrease, from $ 7.6 million to $ 7.3 million, is primarily attributable to a decline in selling, general and administrative expenses associated with the lower level of consolidated net sales, as discussed above. Unallocated operating expenses in the six months ended January 31, 2013 includes some of the legal costs and professional fees associated with certain legal proceedings and other matters, which are discussed in “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (20) Legal Proceedings and Other Matters” in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q.

Amortization of stock-based compensation expense, which is included in unallocated operating expenses, was $1.6 million in the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $1.9 million in the six months ended January 31, 2012 .

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $4.1 million and $4.3 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , and primarily reflects interest on our 3.0% convertible notes.

Interest Income and Other. Interest income and other for the six months ended January 31, 2013 was $ 0.6 million as compared to $ 0.9 million for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . The decrease of $0.3 million is primarily attributable to lower cash balances as a result of the repurchases of our common stock and dividend payments. Interest income and other for both periods is primarily generated from interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents. All of our available cash and cash equivalents are currently invested in bank deposits, money market mutual funds, certificates of deposit, and short-term U.S. Treasury securities which, at this time, are currently yielding a blended annual interest rate of approximately 0.40%.

Index

Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes was $6.0 million and $ 4.6 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. Our effective tax rate was 37.8% for the six months ended January 31, 2013 compared to 20.0% for the six months ended January 31, 2012 .

Our effective tax rate for the six months ended January 31, 2013 reflects a net discrete tax expense of approximately $0.4 million, of which $0.7 million relates to the establishment of a valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets of one of our foreign subsidiaries, offset, in part, by a $0.3 million discrete tax benefit related to the retroactive extension of the federal research and experimentation credit from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended January 31, 2012 reflects a net discrete tax benefit of approximately $3.5 million, primarily resulting from the effective settlement of certain federal and state income tax audits, as well as the reversal of tax contingencies no longer required due to the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations. Excluding these discrete tax items in both periods, our effective tax rate for the six months ended January 31, 2013 would have been 35.5% as compared to 35.0% for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . The increase from 35.0% to 35.5% is principally attributable to the expected product and geographical mix changes reflected in our updated fiscal 2013 business outlook. Fiscal 2013 is also expected to benefit from the recording of twelve months of federal research and experimentation credits as compared to five months in fiscal 2012, as the federal research and experimentation credit had previously expired on December 31, 2011. Excluding the impact of any discrete tax items, our fiscal 2013 estimated effective tax rate is expected to approximate 35.5%.

Index

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents decreased to $ 352.9 million at January 31, 2013 from $367.9 million at July 31, 2012 , a decrease of $ 15.0 million . The decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the six months ended January 31, 2013 was driven by the following:

•

Net cash provided by operating activities was $ 11.4 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $ 11.2 million for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . This increase was primarily attributable to a decrease in net working capital requirements offset by a decrease in net income, during the six months ended January 31, 2013 . Although we expect to generate significant positive net cash from operating activities for the remainder of fiscal 2013 , we anticipate, based on our current backlog and anticipated order flow, the large majority will be generated in the fourth quarter. The exact amount will be impacted by the timing of working capital requirements associated with our overall sales efforts.


•	Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended January 31, 2013 was $ 2.5 million as compared to $ 2.7 million for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . Both of these amounts primarily represent expenditures relating to ongoing equipment upgrades and enhancements.

•

Net cash used in financing activities was $ 23.9 million for the six months ended January 31, 2013 as compared to $ 167.1 million for the six months ended January 31, 2012 . During the six months ended January 31, 2013 , we used $10.5 million for the repurchase of our common stock pursuant to our $250.0 million stock repurchase program. In addition, during the six months ended January 31, 2013 , we paid $14.3 million in cash dividends to our stockholders.

Our investment policy relating to our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents is intended to minimize principal loss while at the same time maximize the income we receive without significantly increasing risk. To minimize risk, we generally invest our cash and cash equivalents in money market mutual funds (both government and commercial), certificates of deposit, bank deposits, and U.S. Treasury securities. Many of our money market mutual funds invest in direct obligations of the U.S. government, bank securities guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, certificates of deposit and commercial paper and other securities issued by other companies. While we cannot predict future market conditions or market liquidity or the ultimate outcome of the current European monetary issues and related concerns, we believe our investment policies are appropriate in the current environment. Ultimately, the availability of our cash and cash equivalents is dependent on a well-functioning liquid market.

As of January 31, 2013 , our material short-term cash requirements primarily consist of cash necessary to fund: (i) our ongoing working capital needs, including income tax payments, (ii) anticipated quarterly dividends, and (iii) repurchases of our common stock that we may make pursuant to our stock repurchase programs. In addition, in future periods, we may also redeploy a large portion of our cash and cash equivalents for one or more acquisitions.

During the six months ended January 31, 2013, we repurchased 397,798 shares of our common stock in open-market transactions with an average price per share of $26.34 and at an aggregate cost of $10.5 million (including transaction costs). As of January 31, 2013 , we were authorized to repurchase up to an additional $50.8 million of our common stock, pursuant to a $250.0 million and a $50.0 million stock repurchase program that were authorized by our Board of Directors in September 2011 and December 2012, respectively. In February 2013, we completed our $250.0 million stock repurchase program; and as of March 6, 2013, we can repurchase an additional $45.1 million pursuant to our $50.0 million stock repurchase program. The $50.0 million stock repurchase program has no time restrictions and repurchases may be made in open-market or privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1 trading plans.

During the six months ended January 31, 2013 , our Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends of $0.275 per common share on September 26, 2012 , totaling $4.8 million, and on December 6, 2012 , totaling $4.8 million, which were paid to shareholders on November 20, 2012 and December 27, 2012 , respectively. On March 7, 2013 , our Board of Directors declared our seventh consecutive quarterly dividend of $0.275 per common share, payable on May 21, 2013 to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 19, 2013 . Future dividends are subject to Board approval.

Our material long-term cash requirements primarily consist of the possible use of cash to repay $200.0 million of our 3.0% convertible senior notes and payments relating to our operating leases. In addition, we expect to make future cash payments of approximately $4.4 million related to our 2009 Radyne-related restructuring plan.

We have historically met both our short-term and long-term cash requirements with funds provided by a combination of cash and cash equivalent balances, cash generated from operating activities and cash generated from financing transactions.

Index

Our secured revolving credit facility allows us to borrow up to $100.0 million and provides an option to extend the agreement beyond April 30, 2014 .

In light of ongoing tight credit market conditions and overall adverse business conditions, we continue to receive requests from our customers for higher credit limits and longer payment terms. Because of our strong cash position and the nominal amount of interest we are earning on our cash and cash equivalents, we have, on a limited basis, approved certain customer requests. We continue to monitor our accounts receivable credit portfolio and have not had any material negative customer credit experiences to date.

Although it is difficult in the current economic and credit environment to predict the terms and conditions of financing that may be available in the future, should our short-term or long-term cash requirements increase beyond our current expectations, we believe that we would have sufficient access to credit from financial institutions and/or financing from public and private debt and equity markets.

As discussed in “ Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note (20) Legal Proceedings and Other Matters,” we are incurring legal fees and professional costs associated with legal proceedings and other matters. The outcome of these legal proceedings and investigations is inherently difficult to predict and an adverse outcome in one or more matters could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

Based on our anticipated level of future sales and operating income, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalent balances and our cash generated from operating activities will be sufficient to meet both our currently anticipated short-term and long-term operating cash requirements.

FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

In May 2009, we issued $200.0 million of our 3.0% convertible senior notes in a private offering pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The net proceeds from this transaction were approximately $194.5 million after deducting the initial purchasers’ discount and transaction costs. For further information, see “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note (12) 3.0% Convertible Senior Notes.”

We have a committed $100.0 million secured revolving credit facility ("Credit Facility") with a syndicate of bank lenders, as amended June 6, 2012. The Credit Facility expires on April 30, 2014 but may be extended by us to December 31, 2016 , subject to certain conditions relating primarily to the repurchase, redemption or conversion of our 3.0% convertible senior notes and compliance with all other Credit Facility covenants. The Credit Facility provides for the extension of credit to us in the form of revolving loans, including letters of credit, at any time and from time to time during its term, in the aggregate principal amount at any time outstanding not to exceed $100.0 million for both revolving loans and letters of credit, with sub-limits of $15.0 million for commercial letters of credit and $35.0 million for standby letters of credit. Subject to certain limitations as defined, the Credit Facility may be used for acquisitions, stock repurchases, dividends, working capital and other general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility also contains financial condition covenants requiring that we: (i) not exceed a maximum ratio of consolidated total indebtedness to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (each as defined in the Credit Facility); (ii) not exceed a maximum ratio of consolidated senior secured indebtedness to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (each as defined in the Credit Facility); (iii) maintain a minimum fixed charge ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility); and (iv) maintain a minimum consolidated net worth; in each case measured on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Credit Facility also requires that, in the event total consolidated indebtedness (as defined in the Credit Facility) is less than $200.0 million , we maintain a minimum level of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Facility). See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note (11) Credit Facility.”

At January 31, 2013 , we have approximately $1.9 million of standby letters of credit outstanding under this Credit Facility relating to the guarantee of future performance on certain customer contracts and no commercial letters of credit outstanding.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of January 31, 2013 , we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

Index

COMMITMENTS

At January 31, 2013 , we had contractual cash obligations relating to: (i) our operating lease commitments; (ii) satellite lease expenditures for certain mobile data communications segment's products, such as our SENS products; and (iii) the potential cash repayment of our 3.0% convertible senior notes. At January 31, 2013 , payments due under these long-term obligations, excluding interest on the 3.0% convertible senior notes, are as follows:



	Obligations Due by Fiscal Years or Maturity Date (in thousands)
	Total			Remainder of 2013		2014 and 2015		2016 and 2017		After 2017
Operating lease commitments	$	31,174		3,756		11,486		9,017		6,915
3.0% convertible senior notes (see below)	200,000			—		—		—		200,000
Total contractual cash obligations	231,174			3,756		11,486		9,017		206,915
Less contractual sublease payments	(3,491		)	(612	)	(2,555	)	(324	)	—
Net contractual cash obligations	$	227,683		3,144		8,931		8,693		206,915

In the normal course of business, we routinely enter into binding and non-binding purchase obligations, primarily covering anticipated purchases of inventory and equipment. Such amounts are not included in the above table and we do not expect that these commitments, as of January 31, 2013 , will materially adversely affect our liquidity.

As discussed further in “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note (12) 3.0% Convertible Senior Notes” on May 8, 2009 , we issued $200.0 million of our 3.0% convertible senior notes. Holders of the notes will have the right to require us to repurchase some or all of the outstanding notes, solely for cash, on May 1, 2014 , May 1, 2019 and May 1, 2024 and upon certain events, including a change in control. If not redeemed by us or repaid pursuant to the holders’ right to require repurchase, the notes mature on May 1, 2029 .

As discussed further in “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note (19) Stockholders’ Equity,” on March 7, 2013 , our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.275 per common share to be paid on May 21, 2013 to our shareholders of record at the close of business on April 19, 2013 . Future dividends are subject to Board approval. No dividend amounts are included in the above table.

At January 31, 2013 , we have approximately $1.9 million of standby letters of credit outstanding under our Credit Facility related to the guarantee of future performance on certain contracts. Such amounts are not included in the above table.

In the ordinary course of business, we include indemnification provisions in certain of our customer contracts. Pursuant to these agreements, we have agreed to indemnify, hold harmless and reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, including but not limited to losses related to third-party intellectual property claims. To date, there have not been any material costs or expenses incurred in connection with such indemnification clauses. Our insurance policies may not cover the cost of defending indemnification claims or providing indemnification. As a result if a claim were asserted against us by any party that we have agreed to indemnify, we could incur future legal costs and damages.

We have change of control agreements and indemnification agreements with certain of our executive officers and certain key employees. All of these agreements may require payments by us, in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, a change in control of our Company.

Pursuant to an indemnification agreement with our CEO (see Exhibit 10.1, "Form of Indemnification Agreement" in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on March 8, 2007), our Board of Directors agreed to pay, on behalf of our CEO, expenses incurred by him in connection with an investigation currently being conducted by the SEC and an investigation by the United States Attorney for the Eastern District Court of New York, on the condition that Mr. Kornberg repay such amounts to the extent that it is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified by us. To-date, legal expenses paid on behalf of our CEO have been nominal; however, we have incurred approximately $1.3 million of expenses (of which $1.0 million was incurred in fiscal 2012) responding to the subpoenas which are discussed in “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (20) Legal Proceedings and Other Matters.” Any amounts that may be advanced to our CEO in the future are not included in the above table.

Index

Our condensed consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2013 includes total liabilities of $3.1 million for uncertain tax positions, including interest, all of which may result in cash payment. The future payments related to uncertain tax positions have not been presented in the table above due to the uncertainty of the amounts and timing of cash settlement with the taxing authorities.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

We are required to prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) which is the source for all authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which is commonly referred to as “GAAP.” The ASC is subject to updates by the FASB, which are known as Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”).

The following ASUs have been issued and incorporated into the ASC and have not yet been adopted by us:

•

FASB ASU No. 2011-11, issued in December 2011, which requires entities to disclose both gross and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting agreement. The objective of this ASU is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). In January 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, which clarifies that the scope of ASU No. 2011-11 applies to derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, "Derivatives and Hedging," including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar arrangement. This ASU, as amended, is effective in our first quarter of fiscal year 2014 and should be applied retrospectively for all comparable periods presented. As we currently do not have any of the aforementioned derivative instruments, we do not believe the adoption of this ASU, as amended, will have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

•

FASB ASU No. 2013-02, issued in February 2013, which requires, among other things, entities to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This ASU is effective in our third quarter of fiscal 2013 and should be applied prospectively. Adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures, because we do not have any other component of comprehensive income except for net income.

•

FASB ASU No. 2013-04, issued in February 2013, which provides guidance for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements, for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date. Examples of obligations within the scope of this ASU include debt arrangements, settled litigation and judicial rulings and other contractual obligations. This ASU is effective no later than the first quarter of our fiscal 2015, and should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented, for those obligations that exist at the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We are currently evaluating if this ASU will have any potential impact on our consolidated financial statements and or disclosures.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuat ions due to changes in interest rates primarily from our investment of available cash balances. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes.

As of January 31, 2013 , we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $352.9 million , which consisted of cash and highly-liquid money market mutual funds, certificates of deposit, bank deposits and U.S. Treasury securities. Many of these investments are subject to fluctuations in interest rates, which could impact our results. Based on our investment portfolio balance as of January 31, 2013 , a hypothetical change in interest rates of 10% would have a $0.1 million impact on interest income over a one-year period. Ultimately, the availability of our cash and cash equivalents is dependent on a well-functioning liquid market.

Our 3.0% convertible senior notes bear a fixed rate of interest. As such, our earnings and cash flows are not sensitive to changes in interest rates on our long-term debt. As of January 31, 2013 , we estimate the fair market value on our 3.0% convertible senior notes to be $206.5 million based on quoted market prices in an active market.

Index

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures was carried out by us under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by the report to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. A system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system of controls are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

The certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, that are Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2, respectively, should be read in conjunction with the foregoing information for a more complete understanding of the references in those Exhibits to disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.

Index

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (20) Legal Proceedings and Other Matters,” in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q for information regarding legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2012 .

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The number and average price of shares purchased during the six months ended January 31, 2013 are set forth in the table below:



	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as part of Publicly Announced Program	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program
August 1 – August 31, 2012	—	$	—	—	$	11,268,000
September 1 – September 30, 2012	—	—		—	11,268,000
October 1 – October 31, 2012	—	—		—	11,268,000
November 1 – November 30, 2012	—	—		—	11,268,000
December 1 – December 31, 2012	22,213	25.33		22,213	60,705,000
January 1 – January 31, 2013	375,585	26.40		375,585	50,798,000
Total	397,798	26.34		397,798	50,798,000

During the six months ended January 31, 2013, we repurchased 397,798 shares of our common stock in open-market transactions with an average price per share of $26.34 and at an aggregate cost of $10.5 million (including transaction costs). As of January 31, 2013 , we were authorized to repurchase up to an additional $50.8 million of our common stock, pursuant to a $250.0 million and a $50.0 million stock repurchase program that were authorized by our Board of Directors in September 2011 and December 2012, respectively. In February 2013, we completed our $250.0 million stock repurchase program; and as of March 6, 2013, we can repurchase an additional $45.1 million pursuant to our $50.0 million stock repurchase program. The $50.0 million stock repurchase program has no time restrictions and repurchases may be made in open-market or privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1 trading plans.

See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (11) Credit Facility,” in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q for a description of certain restrictions on equity security repurchases.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Index

Item 6. Exhibits


(a)	Exhibits

Exhibit 31.1 - Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 31.2 - Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 32.1 - Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 32.2 - Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 101.INS - XBRL Instance Document

Exhibit 101.SCH - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

Exhibit 101.CAL - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101.LAB - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101.PRE - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101.DEF - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

Index

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.

(Registrant)




Date:	March 7, 2013	By: /s/ Fred Kornberg
		Fred Kornberg
		Chairman of the Board
		Chief Executive Officer and President
		(Principal Executive Officer)



Date:	March 7, 2013	By: /s/ Michael D. Porcelain
		Michael D. Porcelain
		Senior Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I - Financial Information Item 1. Financial Statements Item 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 4. Controls and Procedures Part II Item 1. Legal Proceedings Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

Exhibit 31.1 - Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 31.2 - Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 32.1 - Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 32.2 - Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

CMTL 10-Q Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2013

Exhibits