COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP /DE/
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
FORM 10-Q
|
(Mark One)
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended
April 30, 2017
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
Commission File Number: 0-7928
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
|
11-2139466
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation /organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
|
68 South Service Road, Suite 230,
Melville, NY
|
|
11747 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
(631) 962-7000
|
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
|
Emerging growth company
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
No
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
As of
June 1, 2017
, the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.10 per share, of the registrant was
23,570,116
shares.
|
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
INDEX
|
|||
|
Page
|
|||
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||
|
Item 1.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Item 2.
|
||
|
|
|||
|
Item 3.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Item 4.
|
||
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||
|
|
Item 1.
|
||
|
|
Item 1A.
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Item 2.
|
||
|
Item 4.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Item 6.
|
||
|
|
|||
1
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
April 30, 2017
|
July 31, 2016
|
||||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||
|
Current assets:
|
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
58,817,000
|
|
66,805,000
|
|
||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
120,448,000
|
|
150,967,000
|
|
|||
|
Inventories, net
|
67,337,000
|
|
71,354,000
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
19,599,000
|
|
14,513,000
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
266,201,000
|
|
303,639,000
|
|
|||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
33,981,000
|
|
38,667,000
|
|
|||
|
Goodwill
|
290,633,000
|
|
287,618,000
|
|
|||
|
Intangibles with finite lives, net
|
267,139,000
|
|
284,694,000
|
|
|||
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
2,765,000
|
|
3,309,000
|
|
|||
|
Other assets, net
|
3,039,000
|
|
3,269,000
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
863,758,000
|
|
921,196,000
|
|
||
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
27,226,000
|
|
33,462,000
|
|
||
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
73,844,000
|
|
98,034,000
|
|
|||
|
Dividends payable
|
2,342,000
|
|
7,005,000
|
|
|||
|
Customer advances and deposits
|
31,326,000
|
|
29,665,000
|
|
|||
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
14,387,000
|
|
11,067,000
|
|
|||
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
2,689,000
|
|
3,592,000
|
|
|||
|
Interest payable
|
95,000
|
|
1,321,000
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
151,909,000
|
|
184,146,000
|
|
|||
|
Non-current portion of long-term debt, net
|
211,509,000
|
|
239,969,000
|
|
|||
|
Non-current portion of capital lease obligations
|
2,185,000
|
|
4,021,000
|
|
|||
|
Income taxes payable
|
2,502,000
|
|
2,992,000
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
14,784,000
|
|
9,798,000
|
|
|||
|
Customer advances and deposits, non-current
|
8,064,000
|
|
5,764,000
|
|
|||
|
Other liabilities
|
3,150,000
|
|
4,105,000
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities
|
394,103,000
|
|
450,795,000
|
|
|||
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 19)
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Preferred stock, par value $.10 per share; shares authorized and unissued 2,000,000
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Common stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued 38,603,033 shares and 38,367,997 shares at April 30, 2017 and July 31, 2016, respectively
|
3,860,000
|
|
3,837,000
|
|
|||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
527,434,000
|
|
524,797,000
|
|
|||
|
Retained earnings
|
380,210,000
|
|
383,616,000
|
|
|||
|
|
911,504,000
|
|
912,250,000
|
|
|||
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Treasury stock, at cost (15,033,317 shares at April 30, 2017 and July 31, 2016)
|
(441,849,000
|
)
|
(441,849,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
469,655,000
|
|
470,401,000
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
863,758,000
|
|
921,196,000
|
|
||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
Three months ended April 30,
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
127,792,000
|
|
124,187,000
|
|
402,606,000
|
|
258,627,000
|
|
||||
|
Cost of sales
|
75,331,000
|
|
72,796,000
|
|
244,833,000
|
|
149,596,000
|
|
|||||
|
Gross profit
|
52,461,000
|
|
51,391,000
|
|
157,773,000
|
|
109,031,000
|
|
|||||
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
25,923,000
|
|
30,439,000
|
|
89,596,000
|
|
60,818,000
|
|
|||||
|
Research and development
|
12,961,000
|
|
12,613,000
|
|
40,371,000
|
|
28,216,000
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
5,468,000
|
|
4,776,000
|
|
17,555,000
|
|
7,348,000
|
|
|||||
|
Settlement of intellectual property litigation
|
(2,041,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
(12,020,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition plan expenses
|
—
|
|
16,960,000
|
|
—
|
|
20,689,000
|
|
|||||
|
|
42,311,000
|
|
64,788,000
|
|
135,502,000
|
|
117,071,000
|
|
|||||
|
Operating income (loss)
|
10,150,000
|
|
(13,397,000
|
)
|
22,271,000
|
|
(8,040,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other expenses (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interest expense and other
|
2,761,000
|
|
3,473,000
|
|
8,938,000
|
|
3,621,000
|
|
|||||
|
Interest income and other
|
88,000
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
12,000
|
|
(227,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
7,301,000
|
|
(16,865,000
|
)
|
13,321,000
|
|
(11,434,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
2,884,000
|
|
(2,510,000
|
)
|
4,808,000
|
|
(994,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
4,417,000
|
|
(14,355,000
|
)
|
8,513,000
|
|
(10,440,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income (loss) per share (See Note 5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
(0.89
|
)
|
0.36
|
|
(0.65
|
)
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
(0.89
|
)
|
0.36
|
|
(0.65
|
)
|
||||
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic
|
23,449,000
|
|
16,195,000
|
|
23,420,000
|
|
16,184,000
|
|
|||||
|
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding – diluted
|
23,503,000
|
|
16,195,000
|
|
23,449,000
|
|
16,184,000
|
|
|||||
|
Dividends declared per issued and outstanding common share as of the applicable dividend record date
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
0.30
|
|
0.50
|
|
0.90
|
|
||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
NINE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2017 AND 2016
(Unaudited)
|
Common Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Retained Earnings
|
Treasury Stock
|
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of July 31, 2015
|
31,165,401
|
|
$
|
3,117,000
|
|
$
|
427,083,000
|
|
$
|
413,058,000
|
|
15,033,317
|
|
$
|
(441,849,000
|
)
|
$
|
401,409,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Equity-classified stock award compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,125,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,125,000
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares
|
29,070
|
|
3,000
|
|
496,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
499,000
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Common stock issued for net settlement of stock-based awards
|
9,925
|
|
1,000
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(74,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash dividends declared
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(14,544,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(14,544,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Accrual of dividend equivalents, net of reversal
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(97,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(97,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income tax shortfall from settlement of stock-based awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Reversal of deferred tax assets associated with expired and unexercised stock-based awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(55,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(55,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(10,440,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(10,440,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance as of April 30, 2016
|
31,204,396
|
|
$
|
3,121,000
|
|
$
|
430,549,000
|
|
$
|
387,977,000
|
|
15,033,317
|
|
$
|
(441,849,000
|
)
|
$
|
379,798,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of July 31, 2016
|
38,367,997
|
|
$
|
3,837,000
|
|
$
|
524,797,000
|
|
$
|
383,616,000
|
|
15,033,317
|
|
$
|
(441,849,000
|
)
|
$
|
470,401,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Equity-classified stock award compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,980,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,980,000
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares
|
49,694
|
|
5,000
|
|
509,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
514,000
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net
|
144,988
|
|
14,000
|
|
(14,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Common stock issued for net settlement of stock-based awards
|
40,354
|
|
4,000
|
|
(248,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(244,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash dividends declared
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(11,691,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(11,691,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Accrual of dividend equivalents, net of reversal
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(228,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(228,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income tax shortfall from settlement of stock-based awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(240,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(240,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Reversal of deferred tax assets associated with expired and unexercised stock-based awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(350,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(350,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,513,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,513,000
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance as of April 30, 2017
|
38,603,033
|
|
$
|
3,860,000
|
|
$
|
527,434,000
|
|
$
|
380,210,000
|
|
15,033,317
|
|
$
|
(441,849,000
|
)
|
$
|
469,655,000
|
|
|||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
|
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
|||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
8,513,000
|
|
(10,440,000
|
)
|
||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment
|
10,849,000
|
|
6,078,000
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of intangible assets with finite lives
|
17,555,000
|
|
7,348,000
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
2,980,000
|
|
3,166,000
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
1,450,000
|
|
292,000
|
|
|||
|
Settlement of intellectual property litigation
|
(12,020,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
(147,000
|
)
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts
|
454,000
|
|
670,000
|
|
|||
|
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory
|
1,758,000
|
|
2,022,000
|
|
|||
|
Excess income tax benefit from stock-based award exercises
|
(78,000
|
)
|
(23,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
6,606,000
|
|
(516,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of business acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Accounts receivable
|
30,065,000
|
|
23,057,000
|
|
|||
|
Inventories
|
2,259,000
|
|
5,068,000
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(1,532,000
|
)
|
1,877,000
|
|
|||
|
Other assets
|
230,000
|
|
(306,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
(6,088,000
|
)
|
(9,846,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
(16,832,000
|
)
|
(4,013,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Customer advances and deposits
|
3,961,000
|
|
(5,910,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Other liabilities, non-current
|
(1,042,000
|
)
|
(882,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Interest payable
|
(1,226,000
|
)
|
82,000
|
|
|||
|
Income taxes payable
|
(4,038,000
|
)
|
(5,436,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
43,677,000
|
|
12,273,000
|
|
|||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Payments for business acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
—
|
|
(280,535,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
(6,223,000
|
)
|
(3,063,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(6,223,000
|
)
|
(283,598,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net (payments) borrowings under Revolving Loan Facility
|
(18,300,000
|
)
|
101,905,000
|
|
|||
|
Cash dividends paid
|
(16,518,000
|
)
|
(14,540,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Repayment of long-term debt under Term Loan Facility
|
(7,747,000
|
)
|
(3,125,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Repayment of principal amounts under capital lease obligations
|
(2,739,000
|
)
|
(717,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Payment of issuance costs related to equity offering
|
(626,000
|
)
|
(337,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Payment of deferred financing costs
|
(104,000
|
)
|
(10,123,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares
|
514,000
|
|
499,000
|
|
|||
|
Excess income tax benefit from stock-based award exercises
|
78,000
|
|
23,000
|
|
|||
|
Borrowing of long-term debt under Term Loan Facility
|
—
|
|
250,000,000
|
|
|||
|
Required payments for debt assumed for business acquisition
|
—
|
|
(134,101,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(45,442,000
|
)
|
189,484,000
|
|
|||
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(7,988,000
|
)
|
(81,841,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
66,805,000
|
|
150,953,000
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
58,817,000
|
|
69,112,000
|
|
||
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. (Continued)
|
|||||||
5
|
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
|||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interest
|
$
|
8,584,000
|
|
2,976,000
|
|
||
|
Income taxes, net
|
$
|
2,240,000
|
|
4,766,000
|
|
||
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cash dividends declared but unpaid (including accrual of dividend equivalents)
|
$
|
2,570,000
|
|
5,265,000
|
|
||
|
Accrued additions to property, plant and equipment
|
$
|
824,000
|
|
125,000
|
|
||
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Accrued deferred financing costs
|
$
|
—
|
|
139,000
|
|
||
|
Accrued shelf registration costs
|
$
|
—
|
|
20,000
|
|
||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1)
General
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. and its subsidiaries (“Comtech,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) as of and for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2017
and for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the information furnished reflects all material adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the unaudited interim periods. Our results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year.
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reported period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Our condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2016
and the notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and all of our other filings with the SEC.
As disclosed in more detail in
Note (15) - "Segment Information"
, we manage our business in
two
reportable segments: Commercial Solutions and Government Solutions.
(2)
Acquisition
On
February 23, 2016
, we completed the acquisition of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. ("TCS"), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
November 22, 2015
(the “Merger Agreement”), among Comtech, TCS and Typhoon Acquisition Corp., a Maryland corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Comtech (“Merger Sub”).
TCS is a leading provider of commercial solutions such as public safety systems and enterprise application technologies and government solutions such as command and control (also known as Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (“C4ISR”) applications). The TCS acquisition resulted in Comtech entering complementary markets and expanding our domestic and international commercial offerings. TCS is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Comtech.
The acquisition has an aggregate purchase price for accounting purposes of
$340,432,000
(also referred to as the transaction equity value) and an enterprise value of
$423,629,000
. The fair value of consideration transferred in connection with the TCS acquisition was
$280,535,000
in cash, which is net of
$59,897,000
of cash acquired. We funded the acquisition (including transaction and merger related expenditures) and repaid
$134,101,000
of debt assumed in connection with the acquisition by redeploying a significant amount of our combined cash and cash equivalents, with the remaining funds coming from a
$400,000,000
Secured Credit Facility (the "Secured Credit Facility"), which is discussed further in
Note (10) -
"
Secured Credit Facility.
"
We have incurred transaction and merger related expenditures which include significant amounts primarily for: (i) change-in-control payments, (ii) severance, (iii) costs associated with establishing our Secured Credit Facility, and (iv) professional fees for financial and legal advisors for both Comtech and TCS. There were
$16,960,000
and
$20,689,000
, respectively, of transaction and merger related expenses recorded during the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
. There were
no
transaction and merger related expenses during the three and nine months ended April 30, 2017. Cumulatively, through
April 30, 2017
, acquisition plan expenses were
$21,276,000
and primarily related to the TCS acquisition. Additional transaction and merger related expenditures were either accounted for by TCS prior to being acquired by Comtech or were capitalized by us (such as deferred financing costs) or recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital (such as issuance costs related to our June 2016 equity offering) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Our condensed consolidated financial results include net sales from TCS operations of
$66,693,000
and
$220,578,000
, for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2017
, respectively, and
$65,957,000
for both the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
.
7
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
We have accounted for the TCS acquisition under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC 805, "Business Combinations." The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their fair value at
February 23, 2016
, pursuant to the business combination accounting rules. Acquisition-related transaction costs are not included as components of consideration transferred but are expensed in the period incurred. The following table summarizes the final estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the TCS acquisition:
|
Purchase Price Allocation
|
||||
|
Shares of TCS common stock purchased
|
$
|
318,605,000
|
|
|
|
Stock-based awards settled
|
21,827,000
|
|
||
|
Aggregate purchase price at fair value
|
$
|
340,432,000
|
|
|
|
Allocation of aggregate purchase price:
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
59,897,000
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
115,913,000
|
|
||
|
Deferred tax assets, net, non-current
|
85,490,000
|
|
||
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
25,689,000
|
|
||
|
Other assets, non-current
|
2,641,000
|
|
||
|
Current liabilities (excluding interest accrued on debt)
|
(123,956,000
|
)
|
||
|
Debt (including interest accrued)
|
(134,101,000
|
)
|
||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
(8,993,000
|
)
|
||
|
Other liabilities
|
(9,156,000
|
)
|
||
|
Net tangible assets at fair value
|
$
|
13,424,000
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets, deferred taxes and goodwill:
|
Estimated Useful Lives
|
|||
|
Customer relationships and backlog
|
$
|
223,100,000
|
|
21 years
|
|
Trade names
|
20,000,000
|
|
10 to 20 years
|
|
|
Technology
|
35,000,000
|
|
5 to 15 years
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
(104,371,000
|
)
|
||
|
Goodwill
|
153,279,000
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
Allocation of aggregate purchase price
|
$
|
340,432,000
|
|
|
The purchase price allocation shown in the above table includes the final estimated fair value of contingent liabilities associated with TCS's intellectual property matters and the warranty obligations for TCS's 911 call handling software, which are discussed in more detail in
Note (19)
- "
Legal Proceedings and Other Matters
" and
Note (8) - "Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities,
" respectively. These estimated fair values reflect market participant assumptions, as required by FASB ASC 850 "Business Combinations," and do not reflect our settlement position or amounts we actually may pay.
The acquired identifiable intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis, which we believe approximates the pattern in which the assets are utilized, over their estimated useful lives. The fair value of technologies and trade names was based on the discounted capitalization of royalty expense saved because we now own the assets. The estimated fair value of customer relationships and backlog was primarily based on the value of the discounted cash flows that the related intangible asset could be expected to generate in the future. Among the factors contributing to the recognition of goodwill, as a component of the purchase price allocation, were synergies in products and technologies and the addition of a skilled, assembled workforce. This goodwill has been assigned to our Government Solutions and Commercial Solutions segments based on specific identification and, while generally not deductible for income tax purposes, certain goodwill related to previous business combinations by TCS will be deductible for income tax purposes.
8
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table below, for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
, combines the historical results of Comtech for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
and, due to the differences in the companies’ reporting periods, the historical results of TCS for the three months ended March 31, 2016, as if the acquisition had occurred on August 1, 2014. The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table below, for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
, combines the historical results of Comtech for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
and, due to the differences in the companies’ reporting periods, the historical results of TCS for the nine months ended March 31, 2016, as if the acquisition had occurred on August 1, 2014.
|
Three months ended April 30, 2016
|
Nine months ended April 30, 2016
|
||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
130,238,000
|
|
$
|
453,475,000
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
(21,395,000
|
)
|
(27,694,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Basic net loss per share
|
(1.32
|
)
|
(1.71
|
)
|
|||
|
Diluted net loss per share
|
(1.32
|
)
|
(1.71
|
)
|
|||
The pro forma financial information is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition and cash paid had taken place as of August 1, 2014. The pro forma financial information includes adjustments for:
|
•
|
The elimination of historical sales between Comtech and TCS of
$1,569,000
and
$7,331,000
for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
, respectively.
|
|
•
|
The reduction to capitalized software amortization of
$937,000
and
$3,062,000
, for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
, respectively, related to the difference between the historical value and the estimated fair value of TCS's capitalized software.
|
|
•
|
The elimination of acquisition plan expenses of
$22,464,000
and
$25,507,000
for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
, respectively, due to the assumption that all of the acquisition plan expenses were incurred on August 1, 2014.
|
|
•
|
The incremental amortization expense of
$1,581,000
and
$7,935,000
for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
, respectively, associated with the increase in acquired other intangible assets.
|
|
•
|
The reduction in interest expense of
$1,836,000
for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
and increase in interest expense of
$1,731,000
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
due to the assumed August 1, 2014 repayment of TCS's legacy debt and related new borrowings under our Secured Credit Facility which was utilized to partially fund the TCS acquisition.
|
|
•
|
The reduction to interest income of
$124,000
and
$585,000
for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
, respectively, due to the assumed cash payments relating to the TCS acquisition.
|
|
•
|
The related decrease to the provision for income taxes, based on Comtech’s effective tax rate for the respective periods.
|
(3)
Adoption of Accounting Standards and Updates
We are required to prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) which is the source for all authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which are commonly referred to as “GAAP.” The FASB ASC is subject to updates by the FASB, which are known as Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”). During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we adopted:
9
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2014-12, which requires that a performance target which affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. Our adoption of this FASB ASU did not impact our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2014-15, which provides guidance about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is a substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Our adoption of this ASU did not impact our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2015-11, which simplifies the guidance on the subsequent measurement of inventory other than inventory measured using the last-in, first out or the retail inventory method. This ASU requires in-scope inventory to be subsequently measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value, the latter of which is defined as the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-07, which eliminates the requirement to retroactively adopt the equity method of accounting for an investment as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-17, which amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity (that is the single decision maker of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”)) should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-18, which requires that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2017-01, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
(4)
Fair Value Measurements and Financial Instruments
Using the fair value hierarchy described in FASB ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” we valued our cash and cash equivalents using Level 1 inputs that were based on quoted market prices.
We believe that the carrying amounts of our other current financial assets (such as accounts receivable) and other current liabilities (including accounts payable, accrued expenses and the current portion of our Secured Credit Facility) approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities.
The fair value of the non-current portion of our Secured Credit Facility as of
April 30, 2017
approximates its carrying amount due to its variable interest rate and pricing grid that is dependent upon our leverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter. We believe the fair value of our non-current portion of capital lease obligations, which currently has a blended interest rate of
5.5%
, would not be materially different than its carrying value as of
April 30, 2017
.
As of
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
, other than the financial instruments discussed above, we had no other significant assets or liabilities included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets recorded at fair value, as such term is defined by FASB ASC 820.
10
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
(5)
Earnings Per Share
Our basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares (including vested but unissued stock units, share units, performance shares and restricted stock units ("RSUs")), outstanding during each respective period. Our diluted EPS reflects the dilution from potential common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of equity-classified stock-based awards, if dilutive, outstanding during each respective period. Pursuant to FASB ASC 260, "Earnings Per Share," equity-classified stock-based awards that are subject to performance conditions are not considered in our diluted EPS calculations until the respective performance conditions have been satisfied. When calculating our diluted earnings per share, we consider (i) the amount an employee must pay upon assumed exercise of stock-based awards; (ii) the amount of stock-based compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized; and (iii) the amount of excess tax benefits, if any, that would be credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of in-the-money stock-based awards. This excess tax benefit is the amount resulting from a tax deduction for compensation in excess of compensation expense recognized for financial reporting purposes.
Weighted average stock options, RSUs and restricted stock outstanding of
1,912,000
and
2,362,000
for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, and
2,227,000
and
2,365,000
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, were not included in our diluted EPS calculation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Our EPS calculations exclude
227,000
and
149,000
weighted average performance shares outstanding for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, and
233,000
and
144,000
weighted average performance shares outstanding for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, as the performance conditions have not yet been satisfied. However, the compensation expense related to these awards is included in net income (loss) (the numerator) for EPS calculations for each respective period.
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the basic and diluted EPS calculations:
|
Three months ended April 30,
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
||||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||||
|
Numerator:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) for basic calculation
|
$
|
4,417,000
|
|
(14,355,000
|
)
|
8,513,000
|
|
(10,440,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Numerator for diluted calculation
|
$
|
4,417,000
|
|
(14,355,000
|
)
|
8,513,000
|
|
(10,440,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Denominator:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Denominator for basic calculation
|
23,449,000
|
|
16,195,000
|
|
23,420,000
|
|
16,184,000
|
|
|||||
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Stock-based awards
|
54,000
|
|
—
|
|
29,000
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Denominator for diluted calculation
|
23,503,000
|
|
16,195,000
|
|
23,449,000
|
|
16,184,000
|
|
|||||
(6)
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist of the following at:
|
|
April 30, 2017
|
July 31, 2016
|
|||||
|
Billed receivables from commercial and international customers
|
$
|
69,149,000
|
|
90,185,000
|
|
||
|
Unbilled receivables from commercial and international customers
|
24,929,000
|
|
19,333,000
|
|
|||
|
Billed receivables from the U.S. government and its agencies
|
16,918,000
|
|
21,465,000
|
|
|||
|
Unbilled receivables from the U.S. government and its agencies
|
10,927,000
|
|
21,013,000
|
|
|||
|
Total accounts receivable
|
121,923,000
|
|
151,996,000
|
|
|||
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
1,475,000
|
|
1,029,000
|
|
|||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
$
|
120,448,000
|
|
150,967,000
|
|
||
11
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Unbilled receivables relate to contracts-in-progress for which revenue has been recognized but we have not yet billed the customer for work performed. We had
$118,000
of retainage included in unbilled receivables at both
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
and management estimates that substantially all of the total unbilled receivables at
April 30, 2017
will be billed and collected within one year. Of the unbilled receivables from commercial and international customers at
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
, approximately
$3,593,000
and
$6,070,000
, respectively, relates to a large over-the-horizon microwave system contract with our large U.S. prime contractor customer (all of which related to our North African country end-customer).
As of
April 30, 2017
, the U.S. government (and its agencies) and Verizon Communications Inc. (through various divisions) represented
22.8%
and
11.3%
, respectively, of total accounts receivable. As of
July 31, 2016
, except for the U.S. government (and its agencies), which represented
27.9%
of total accounts receivable, there were
no
other customers which accounted for greater than
10.0%
of total accounts receivable.
As of
July 31, 2016
,
10.5%
of our total accounts receivable related to our North African country end customers.
(7)
Inventories
Inventories consist of the following at:
|
|
April 30, 2017
|
July 31, 2016
|
|||||
|
Raw materials and components
|
$
|
54,551,000
|
|
54,723,000
|
|
||
|
Work-in-process and finished goods
|
28,672,000
|
|
32,829,000
|
|
|||
|
Total inventories
|
83,223,000
|
|
87,552,000
|
|
|||
|
Less reserve for excess and obsolete inventories
|
15,886,000
|
|
16,198,000
|
|
|||
|
Inventories, net
|
$
|
67,337,000
|
|
71,354,000
|
|
||
As of
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
, the amount of inventory directly related to long-term contracts (including contracts-in-progress) was
$2,170,000
and
$2,896,000
, respectively.
As of
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
,
$1,896,000
and
$1,428,000
, respectively, of the inventory balance above related to contracts from third party commercial customers who outsource their manufacturing to us.
(8)
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following at:
|
|
April 30, 2017
|
July 31, 2016
|
|||||
|
Accrued wages and benefits
|
$
|
23,300,000
|
|
23,394,000
|
|
||
|
Accrued legal costs
|
11,362,000
|
|
32,469,000
|
|
|||
|
Accrued warranty obligations
|
18,223,000
|
|
15,362,000
|
|
|||
|
Accrued acquisition-related costs
|
—
|
|
2,119,000
|
|
|||
|
Accrued contract costs
|
6,240,000
|
|
8,348,000
|
|
|||
|
Accrued commissions and royalties
|
3,118,000
|
|
3,473,000
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
11,601,000
|
|
12,869,000
|
|
|||
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
$
|
73,844,000
|
|
98,034,000
|
|
||
12
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Accrued legal costs as of
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
include
$7,069,000
and
$28,112,000
, respectively, related to estimated costs associated with certain TCS intellectual property matters. Accrued legal costs as of
April 30, 2017
include amounts payable for two TCS intellectual property matter settlements that have been finalized and an estimate of legal expenses and potential settlement costs related to one unresolved matter. The accrued potential settlement costs do not reflect the final amounts we may actually pay. Ongoing legal costs associated with defending the remaining legacy TCS intellectual property matter and its ultimate resolution could vary and have a material adverse effect on our future consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. TCS intellectual property matters are discussed in more detail in
Note (19) - "Legal Proceedings and Other Matters.
"
Accrued contract costs represent direct and indirect costs on contracts as well as estimates of amounts owed for invoices not yet received from vendors or reflected in accounts payable.
Accrued warranty obligations relate to estimated liabilities for warranty coverage that we provide to our customers. We generally provide warranty coverage for some of our products for a period of at least
one year
from the date of delivery. We record a liability for estimated warranty expense based on historical claims, product failure rates and other factors. Some of our product warranties are provided under long-term contracts, the costs of which are incorporated into our estimates of total contract costs.
Accrued warranty obligations include warranty obligations for a TCS 911 call handling software solution that was licensed to customers prior to our acquisition of TCS. In aggregate,
$10,216,000
of accrued warranty obligations as of
April 30, 2017
related to this contingent liability, net of charges incurred to date. This amount reflects a consideration of contractual obligations as well as an estimate of future costs to resolve software issues.
Changes in our product warranty liability during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
were as follows:
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
|||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
15,362,000
|
|
8,638,000
|
|
||
|
Provision for warranty obligations
|
4,147,000
|
|
3,183,000
|
|
|||
|
Adjustment to TCS pre-acquisition contingent liability
|
4,200,000
|
|
154,000
|
|
|||
|
Charges incurred
|
(5,486,000
|
)
|
(3,336,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
18,223,000
|
|
8,639,000
|
|
||
(9)
Acquisition-Related Restructuring Plans
Radyne
In connection with our August 1, 2008 acquisition of Radyne, we adopted a restructuring plan for which we recorded
$2,713,000
of estimated restructuring costs. Of this amount,
$613,000
related to severance for Radyne employees which was paid in fiscal 2009. The remaining estimated amounts relate to facility exit costs and were determined as follows:
|
At August 1, 2008
|
|||
|
Total non-cancelable lease obligations
|
$
|
12,741,000
|
|
|
Less: Estimated sublease income
|
8,600,000
|
|
|
|
Total net estimated facility exit costs
|
4,141,000
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest expense to be accreted
|
2,041,000
|
|
|
|
Present value of estimated facility exit costs
|
$
|
2,100,000
|
|
13
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Our total non-cancelable lease obligations were based on the actual lease term which runs from November 1, 2008 through
October 31, 2018
. We estimated sublease income based on (i) the terms of a fully executed sublease agreement that expired on
October 31, 2015
, and (ii) our assessment of future uncertainties relating to the commercial real estate market. Based on our assessment of commercial real estate market conditions, we currently believe that it is not probable that we will be able to sublease the facility for the remaining lease term. As such, in accordance with grandfathered accounting standards that were not incorporated into the FASB’s ASC, we recorded these costs, at fair value, as assumed liabilities as of August 1, 2008, with a corresponding increase to goodwill.
As of
April 30, 2017
, the amount of the acquisition-related restructuring reserve is as follows:
|
|
Cumulative
Activity Through April 30, 2017 |
||
|
Present value of estimated facility exit costs at August 1, 2008
|
$
|
2,100,000
|
|
|
Cash payments made
|
(10,191,000
|
)
|
|
|
Cash payments received
|
8,600,000
|
|
|
|
Accreted interest recorded
|
1,791,000
|
|
|
|
Liability as of April 30, 2017
|
2,300,000
|
|
|
|
Amount recorded as accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
1,497,000
|
|
|
|
Amount recorded as other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
$
|
803,000
|
|
As of
July 31, 2016
, the present value of the estimated facility exit costs was
$3,327,000
. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we made cash payments of
$1,178,000
. Interest accreted for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
was
$44,000
and
$151,000
, respectively, and
$68,000
and
$216,000
, respectively, and is included in interest expense for each respective fiscal period.
Future cash payments associated with our restructuring plan are summarized below:
|
|
As of April 30, 2017
|
||
|
Future lease payments to be made
|
$
|
2,300,000
|
|
|
Interest expense to be accreted in future periods
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
Total remaining payments
|
$
|
2,550,000
|
|
TCS
In connection with our February 23, 2016 acquisition of TCS, we continue to implement a tactical shift in strategy in our Government Solutions segment and have initiated certain cost reduction actions. To date, we have incurred an immaterial amount of severance and retention costs related to our shift in strategy.
14
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
(10)
Secured Credit Facility
On
February 23, 2016
, in connection with our acquisition of TCS, we entered into a
$400,000,000
secured credit facility (the "Secured Credit Facility") with a syndicate of lenders. The Secured Credit Facility comprises a senior secured term loan A facility of
$250,000,000
(the “Term Loan Facility”) and a secured revolving loan facility of up to
$150,000,000
, including a
$25,000,000
letter of credit sublimit (the “Revolving Loan Facility”) and, together, with the Term Loan Facility, matures on February 23, 2021. The proceeds of these borrowings were primarily used to finance our acquisition of TCS, including the repayment of certain existing indebtedness of TCS. The Term Loan Facility requires mandatory quarterly repayments. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we repaid
$7,747,000
principal amount of borrowings under the Term Loan Facility. Under the Revolving Loan Facility, we had outstanding balances ranging from
$41,904,000
to
$84,904,000
during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
. As of
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
, amounts outstanding under our Secured Credit Facility, net, were as follows:
|
|
April 30, 2017
|
|
July 31, 2016
|
|
|||
|
Term Loan Facility
|
$
|
164,900,000
|
|
172,647,000
|
|
||
|
Less unamortized deferred financing costs related to Term Loan Facility
|
4,608,000
|
|
5,515,000
|
|
|||
|
Term Loan Facility, net
|
160,292,000
|
|
167,132,000
|
|
|||
|
Revolving Loan Facility
|
65,604,000
|
|
83,904,000
|
|
|||
|
Amount outstanding under Secured Credit Facility, net
|
225,896,000
|
|
251,036,000
|
|
|||
|
Less current portion of long-term debt
|
14,387,000
|
|
11,067,000
|
|
|||
|
Non-current portion of long-term debt
|
$
|
211,509,000
|
|
239,969,000
|
|
||
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, recorded during the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2017
related to the Secured Credit Facility was
$2,641,000
and
$8,524,000
, respectively, and reflects a blended interest rate of approximately
4.83%
and
4.80%
, respectively. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, recorded during both the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
related to the Secured Credit Facility was
$2,981,000
and reflects a blended interest rate of approximately
5.00%
.
At
April 30, 2017
, we had
$3,845,000
of standby letters of credit outstanding under our Secured Credit Facility related to our guarantees of future performance on certain customer contracts and
no
outstanding commercial letters of credit.
The Revolving Loan Facility is primarily used for working capital and other general corporate purposes of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the issuance of letters of credit. Borrowings under the Secured Credit Facility, pursuant to terms defined in the Secured Credit Facility, shall be either (i) Alternate Base Rate ("ABR") borrowings, which bear interest from the applicable borrowing date at a rate per annum equal to (x) the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate in effect on such day, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate in effect on such day plus
0.50%
per annum and (c) the Adjusted LIBO Rate on such day (or, if such day is not a business day, the immediately preceding business day) plus
1.00%
per annum (provided that if the LIBO Rate is less than
1.00%
, then the LIBO Rate shall be deemed to be
1.00%
), plus (y) the Applicable Rate, or (ii) Eurodollar borrowings, which bear interest from the applicable borrowing date at a rate per annum equal to (x) the Adjusted LIBO Rate for such interest period (provided that if the LIBO Rate is less than
1.00%
, then the LIBO Rate shall be deemed to be
1.00%
) plus (y) the Applicable Rate. The Applicable Rate is determined based on a pricing grid that is dependent upon our leverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter. The Secured Credit Facility contains customary representations, warranties and affirmative covenants and customary negative covenants, subject to negotiated exceptions, on (i) liens, (ii) investments, (iii) indebtedness, (iv) significant corporate changes, including mergers and acquisitions, (v) dispositions, (vi) restricted payments, including stockholder dividends, and (vii) certain other restrictive agreements. The Secured Credit Facility also contains certain financial covenants and customary events of default (subject to grace periods, as appropriate), such as payment defaults, cross-defaults to other material indebtedness, bankruptcy and insolvency, the occurrence of a defined change in control and the failure to observe the negative covenants and other covenants related to the operation of our business.
15
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
At
April 30, 2017
, our Secured Credit Facility required that we maintain compliance with various financial covenants including a maximum allowable Leverage Ratio and a minimum required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as such terms were defined. The maximum allowable Leverage Ratio, in simple terms, represented the net difference of Total Indebtedness (excluding unamortized deferred financing costs) less Available Cash (up to
$50,000,000
) divided by our trailing twelve months ("TTM") Consolidated EBITDA. The definition of Consolidated EBITDA was similar to our Adjusted EBITDA metric (which is fully described in
Note (15) - "Segment Information"
); however, Adjusted EBITDA was reduced by favorable adjustments to operating income related to the settlements of certain TCS intellectual property matters (which are discussed in
Note (19) - "Legal Proceedings and Other Matters"
). The minimum required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, in simple terms, represented Consolidated EBITDA less cash paid for taxes, capital expenditures and dividends, the result of which was then divided by the sum of scheduled principal debt payments and cash paid for interest, all of the aforementioned calculated on a TTM basis. Further, if we had more than
$50,000,000
of cash and cash equivalents for any financial covenant measurement period, the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio would be calculated without a deduction for cash dividends. For the measurement period ended on
April 30, 2017
, based on these definitions, our Leverage Ratio was
2.56
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA (as compared to a maximum allowable of
3.00
x) and our Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio was
2.53
x (as compared to a minimum requirement of
1.25
x) and we were in full compliance with the terms and conditions of our Secured Credit Facility.
On June 6, 2017, we entered into a First Amendment of the Secured Credit Facility (the “June 2017 Amendment”) that is expected to result in increased operating and acquisition flexibility and simplify the calculations of our financial covenants. The June 2017 Amendment resulted in, among other things, that the:
|
(i)
|
Consolidated EBITDA definition will now more closely align with our Adjusted EBITDA metric by eliminating favorable adjustments to operating income related to settlements of TCS intellectual property matters;
|
|
(ii)
|
Leverage Ratio will now be calculated on a “gross” basis using the quotient of Total Indebtedness (excluding unamortized deferred financing costs) divided by our TTM Consolidated EBITDA. The prior Leverage Ratio was calculated on a “net” basis but did not include a reduction for any cash or cash equivalents above
$50,000,000
;
|
|
(iii)
|
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio will now include a deduction for all cash dividends, regardless of the amount of our cash and cash equivalents and the related allowable Quarterly Dividend Amount, as defined, will now align with our current quarterly dividend target of
$0.10
per common share;
|
|
(iv)
|
Balloon or final payment of the Term Loan Facility, which is not due until February 23, 2021, was reduced by
$22,500,000
through increased borrowings from the Revolving Loan Facility, which does not expire until February 23, 2021; and
|
|
(v)
|
Leverage Ratios will be adjusted, in certain conditions, to provide for additional flexibility for us to make acquisitions.
|
In connection with the June 2017 Amendment, there were no changes to: (i) the committed borrowing capacity; (ii) the maturity date; or (iii) interest rates payable (except that the interest rate pricing grid will now be based on the new Leverage Ratio). Also, the June 2017 Amendment did not result in an extinguishment for accounting purposes (as such term is defined in ASC 470 - “
Debt
”). As a result, deferred financing costs (including incremental fees for the June 2017 Amendment) will continue to be amortized over the remaining maturity term of the Secured Credit Facility.
The terms and financial covenants of the June 2017 Amendment are retroactive to
April 30, 2017
. Based on the simplified financial covenant calculations described above, our Leverage Ratio was
3.89
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA (as compared to a maximum allowable of
4.25
x) and our Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio was
1.70
x (as compared to a minimum requirement of
1.25
x). Assuming we had reduced the borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan Facility at April 30, 2017 by
$22,500,000
using our cash and cash equivalents, our Leverage Ratio, on a pro-forma basis, would have been
3.52
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA for the measurement period ended on
April 30, 2017
. Based on the aforementioned, we were in full compliance with the retroactive terms and financial covenants in our Secured Credit Facility, as amended.
16
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
For our fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the maximum allowable Leverage Ratio will decrease to
3.75
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA. In fiscal 2018, such ratio will decrease further each quarter until reaching
3.00
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, with no further reductions thereafter. The minimum required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of
1.25
x will not change for the remaining term of the Secured Credit Facility. Given our expected future business performance, we anticipate maintaining compliance with the terms and financial covenants in our Secured Credit Facility, as amended, for the foreseeable future.
The obligations under the Secured Credit Facility, as amended, are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). As collateral security for amounts outstanding under our Secured Credit Facility, as amended, and the guarantees thereof, we and our Subsidiary Guarantors have granted to an administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, a lien on, and first priority security interest in, substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets.
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth for such terms in the Secured Credit Facility, dated as of February 23, 2016, and the First Amendment of the Secured Credit Facility, dated as of June 6, 2017, both of which have been documented and filed with the SEC.
(11)
Capital Lease Obligations
We lease certain equipment under capital leases, the majority of which we assumed in connection with our acquisition of TCS. As of
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
, the net book value of the leased assets which collateralize the capital lease obligations was
$6,347,000
and
$8,698,000
, respectively, and consisted primarily of machinery and equipment. As of
April 30, 2017
, our capital lease obligations reflect a blended interest rate of approximately
5.5%
. Our capital leases generally contain provisions whereby we can purchase the equipment at the end of the lease for a
one
dollar buyout. Depreciation of leased assets is included in depreciation expense.
Future minimum payments under capital lease obligations consisted of the following at
April 30, 2017
:
|
Remainder of fiscal 2017
|
$
|
918,000
|
|
|
Fiscal 2018
|
2,473,000
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2019
|
1,469,000
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2020
|
304,000
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2021 and beyond
|
—
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
5,164,000
|
|
|
|
Less: amounts representing interest
|
290,000
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
4,874,000
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
2,689,000
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion of capital lease obligations
|
$
|
2,185,000
|
|
(12)
Income Taxes
At
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
, total unrecognized tax benefits were
$8,654,000
and
$9,171,000
, respectively, including interest of
$81,000
and
$63,000
, respectively. At
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
,
$2,502,000
and
$2,992,000
, respectively, of our unrecognized tax benefits were recorded as non-current income taxes payable in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
, the remaining unrecognized tax benefits of
$6,152,000
and
$6,179,000
, respectively, were recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in non-current deferred tax liabilities (as an offset to the associated deferred tax asset). Of the total unrecognized tax benefits at
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
,
$7,679,000
and
$8,261,000
, respectively, net of the reversal of the Federal tax benefit recognized as a deferred tax asset relating to state tax reserves, excluding interest, would positively impact our effective tax rate, if recognized. Unrecognized tax benefits result from income tax positions taken or expected to be taken on our income tax returns for which a tax benefit has not been recorded in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
17
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we reached an effective settlement with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) relating to its audit of our Federal income tax return for fiscal 2014. This effective settlement did not have a material impact on our results of operations. Our Federal income tax returns for fiscal 2015 and 2016 are subject to potential future IRS audit. None of our state income tax returns prior to fiscal 2012 are subject to audit. TCS’s Federal income tax returns for tax years 2013 through 2015 and the tax period from January 1, 2016 to February 23, 2016 are subject to potential future IRS audit. None of TCS’s state income tax returns prior to calendar year 2012 are subject to audit. Future tax assessments or settlements could have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
(13)
Stock Based Compensation
Overview
We issue stock-based awards to certain of our employees and our Board of Directors pursuant to our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (the “Plan”) and our 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), and recognize related stock-based compensation in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The Plan provides for the granting to employees and consultants of Comtech (including prospective employees and consultants): (i) incentive and non-qualified stock options, (ii) restricted stock units ("RSUs"), (iii) RSUs with performance measures (which we refer to as "performance shares"), (iv) restricted stock, (v) stock units (reserved for issuance to non-employee directors) and share units (reserved for issuance to employees) (collectively, “share units”) and (vi) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), among other types of awards. Our non-employee directors are eligible to receive non-discretionary grants of stock-based awards, subject to certain limitations. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be issued, pursuant to the Plan, may not exceed
9,462,500
. Stock options granted may not have a term exceeding
ten years
or, in the case of an incentive stock award granted to a stockholder who owns stock representing more than
10.0%
of the voting power, no more than
five years
. We expect to settle all outstanding awards under the Plan and ESPP with the issuance of new shares of our common stock.
As of
April 30, 2017
, we had granted stock-based awards pursuant to the Plan representing the right to purchase and/or acquire an aggregate of
7,671,924
shares (net of
3,670,231
expired and canceled awards), of which an aggregate of
5,206,985
have been exercised or converted into common stock.
As of
April 30, 2017
, the following stock-based awards, by award type, were outstanding:
|
Stock options
|
1,900,975
|
|
|
Performance shares
|
252,089
|
|
|
RSUs and restricted stock
|
304,116
|
|
|
Share units
|
7,759
|
|
|
Total
|
2,464,939
|
|
Our ESPP provides for the issuance of up to
800,000
shares of our common stock. Our ESPP is intended to provide our eligible employees the opportunity to acquire our common stock at
85%
of fair market value at the date of issuance. Through
April 30, 2017
, we have cumulatively issued
684,066
shares of our common stock to participating employees in connection with our ESPP.
18
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Stock-based compensation for awards issued is reflected in the following line items in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
Three months ended April 30,
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
$
|
56,000
|
|
70,000
|
|
162,000
|
|
233,000
|
|
||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
862,000
|
|
875,000
|
|
2,591,000
|
|
2,630,000
|
|
|||||
|
Research and development expenses
|
73,000
|
|
96,000
|
|
227,000
|
|
303,000
|
|
|||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense before income tax benefit
|
991,000
|
|
1,041,000
|
|
2,980,000
|
|
3,166,000
|
|
|||||
|
Estimated income tax benefit
|
(349,000
|
)
|
(391,000
|
)
|
(1,051,000
|
)
|
(1,103,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
642,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
1,929,000
|
|
2,063,000
|
|
||||
Stock-based compensation for equity-classified awards is measured at the date of grant, based on an estimate of the fair value of the award and is generally expensed over the vesting period of the award. At
April 30, 2017
, unrecognized stock-based compensation of $
7,756,000
, net of estimated forfeitures of $
705,000
, is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.9
years. Total stock-based compensation capitalized and included in ending inventory at both
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
was
$51,000
. There are no liability-classified stock-based awards outstanding as of
April 30, 2017
or
July 31, 2016
.
Stock-based compensation expense, by award type, is summarized as follows:
|
Three months ended April 30,
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
||||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||||
|
Stock options
|
$
|
368,000
|
|
591,000
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
1,803,000
|
|
||||
|
Performance shares
|
361,000
|
|
369,000
|
|
1,227,000
|
|
1,093,000
|
|
|||||
|
RSUs and restricted stock
|
221,000
|
|
46,000
|
|
633,000
|
|
152,000
|
|
|||||
|
ESPP
|
41,000
|
|
35,000
|
|
120,000
|
|
118,000
|
|
|||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense before income tax benefit
|
991,000
|
|
1,041,000
|
|
2,980,000
|
|
3,166,000
|
|
|||||
|
Estimated income tax benefit
|
(349,000
|
)
|
(391,000
|
)
|
(1,051,000
|
)
|
(1,103,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
642,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
1,929,000
|
|
2,063,000
|
|
||||
ESPP stock-based compensation expense primarily relates to the
15%
discount offered to participants in the ESPP.
The estimated income tax benefit as shown in the above table was computed using income tax rates expected to apply when the awards are settled. Such deferred tax asset was recorded net as part of our non-current deferred tax liability in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
April 30, 2017
. The actual income tax benefit recognized for tax reporting is based on the fair market value of our common stock at the time of settlement and can significantly differ from the estimated income tax benefit recorded for financial reporting.
19
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
The following table reconciles the actual income tax benefit recognized for tax deductions relating to the settlement of stock-based awards to the excess income tax benefit reported as a cash flow from financing activities in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
|
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Actual income tax benefit recorded for the tax deductions relating to the settlement of stock-based awards
|
$
|
352,000
|
|
150,000
|
|
||
|
Less: Tax benefit initially recognized on settled stock-based awards vesting subsequent to the adoption of accounting standards that require us to expense stock-based awards
|
274,000
|
|
127,000
|
|
|||
|
Excess income tax benefit from settled equity-classified stock-based awards recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital and reported as a cash inflow from financing activities in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
$
|
78,000
|
|
23,000
|
|
||
As of
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
, the amount of hypothetical tax benefits related to stock-based awards, recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital, was
$16,347,000
and
$16,937,000
, respectively. These amounts represent the initial hypothetical tax benefit of
$8,593,000
determined upon adoption of FASB ASC 718 (which reflects our estimate of cumulative actual tax deductions for awards issued and settled prior to August 1, 2005), adjusted for actual excess income tax benefits or shortfalls since that date. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, we recorded
$590,000
and
$81,000
, respectively, of a reduction to additional paid-in capital and accumulated hypothetical tax benefits, which represent net income tax shortfalls recognized from the settlement of stock-based awards and the reversal of unrealized deferred tax assets associated with certain vested equity-classified stock-based awards that expired during each of the respective periods.
Stock Options
The following table summarizes the Plan's activity during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
:
|
|
Awards
(in Shares)
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Term (Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|||||||||
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2016
|
2,256,679
|
|
$
|
28.87
|
|
||||||||
|
Expired/canceled
|
(118,505
|
)
|
27.34
|
|
|||||||||
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2016
|
2,138,174
|
|
28.96
|
|
|||||||||
|
Expired/canceled
|
(227,598
|
)
|
32.06
|
|
|||||||||
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2017
|
1,910,576
|
|
28.59
|
|
|||||||||
|
Expired/canceled
|
(9,601
|
)
|
26.11
|
|
|||||||||
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2017
|
1,900,975
|
|
$
|
28.60
|
|
5.76
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Exercisable at April 30, 2017
|
1,173,564
|
|
$
|
28.54
|
|
4.96
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Vested and expected to vest at April 30, 2017
|
1,847,340
|
|
$
|
28.60
|
|
5.72
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
Stock options outstanding as of
April 30, 2017
have exercise prices ranging from $
20.90
to $
33.94
. There were
no
stock options granted or exercised during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
. Stock options granted during the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
had exercise prices equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, a contractual term of
five
or
ten
years and a vesting period of
three
or
five
years. The total intrinsic value relating to stock options exercised during the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
was
$32,000
.
20
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
During the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
, at the election of certain holders of vested stock options,
19,200
stock options were net settled upon exercise, which resulted in the issuance of
706
net shares of our common stock after reduction of shares retained to satisfy the exercise price and minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. As there were no exercises during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, there were
no
net settlements of stock options or the related issuance of common stock during the respective period.
The estimated per-share weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
was
$3.95
and
$5.55
, respectively, which was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and included the following weighted average assumptions:
|
Three months ended
|
Nine months ended
|
|||||
|
April 30, 2016
|
April 30, 2016
|
|||||
|
Expected dividend yield
|
5.58
|
%
|
4.42
|
%
|
||
|
Expected volatility
|
35.80
|
%
|
34.39
|
%
|
||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.39
|
%
|
1.53
|
%
|
||
|
Expected life (years)
|
5.04
|
|
5.15
|
|
||
Expected dividend yield is the expected annual dividend as a percentage of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, based on our Board's annual dividend target at the time of grant. We estimate expected volatility by considering the historical volatility of our stock and the implied volatility of publicly-traded call options on our stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for an instrument which closely approximates the expected term. The expected term is the number of years we estimate that awards will be outstanding prior to exercise and is determined by employee groups with sufficiently distinct behavior patterns. Assumptions used in computing the fair value of stock-based awards reflect our best estimates, but involve uncertainties relating to market and other conditions, many of which are outside of our control. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by recipients of stock-based awards.
Performance Shares, RSUs, Restricted Stock and Share Unit Awards
The following table summarizes the Plan's activity relating to performance shares, RSUs, restricted stock and share units:
|
|
|
Awards
(in Shares)
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|||||
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2016
|
|
217,213
|
|
$
|
28.32
|
|
|||||
|
Granted
|
|
418,684
|
|
13.10
|
|
||||||
|
Converted to common stock
|
|
(38,706
|
)
|
14.75
|
|
||||||
|
Forfeited
|
|
(5,155
|
)
|
25.10
|
|
||||||
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2016
|
592,036
|
|
17.80
|
|
|||||||
|
Granted
|
2,632
|
|
11.40
|
|
|||||||
|
Converted to common stock
|
(19,866
|
)
|
29.41
|
|
|||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(6,826
|
)
|
19.65
|
|
|||||||
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2017
|
567,976
|
|
17.34
|
|
|||||||
|
Granted
|
5,836
|
|
11.04
|
|
|||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(9,848
|
)
|
13.64
|
|
|||||||
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2017
|
|
563,964
|
|
$
|
17.34
|
|
$
|
7,901,000
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Vested at April 30, 2017
|
|
35,400
|
|
$
|
26.94
|
|
$
|
496,000
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Vested and expected to vest at April 30, 2017
|
|
540,161
|
|
$
|
17.34
|
|
$
|
7,568,000
|
|
||
21
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
There were
no
fully-vested awards converted into our common stock during the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
. The total intrinsic value relating to fully-vested awards converted into our common stock during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
was
$633,000
and
$275,000
, respectively. Performance shares granted to employees prior to fiscal 2014 generally vest over a
5.3
year period, beginning on the date of grant once pre-established performance goals were attained, and are convertible into shares of our common stock at the time of vesting, on a
one
-for-one basis for no cash consideration. The performance shares granted to employees since fiscal 2014 principally vest over a
three
-year performance period, if pre-established performance goals are attained or as specified pursuant to the Plan and related agreements. As of
April 30, 2017
, the number of outstanding performance shares included in the above table, and the related compensation expense prior to consideration of estimated pre-vesting forfeitures, assume achievement of the pre-established goals at a target level.
RSUs and restricted stock granted to non-employee directors have a vesting period of
three
years and are convertible into shares of our common stock generally at the time of termination, on a
one
-for-one basis for no cash consideration, or earlier under certain circumstances. RSUs granted to employees have a vesting period of
five
years and are convertible into shares of our common stock generally at the time of vesting, on a
one
-for-one basis for no cash consideration.
Share units are vested when issued and are convertible into shares of our common stock generally at the time of termination, on a
one
-for-one basis for no cash consideration, or earlier under certain circumstances. Cumulatively through
April 30, 2017
,
744
share units granted have been converted into common stock.
The fair value of performance shares, RSUs, restricted stock and share units is determined using the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant, less the present value of any estimated future dividend equivalents such awards are not entitled to receive. RSUs and performance shares granted in fiscal 2012 are not entitled to dividend equivalents. RSUs, performance shares and restricted stock granted in fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2017 are entitled to dividend equivalents unless forfeited before vesting occurs; however, performance shares granted in fiscal 2013 were not entitled to such dividend equivalents until our Board of Directors determined that the pre-established performance goals were met. Share units granted prior to fiscal 2014 are not entitled to dividend equivalents. Share units granted in fiscal 2014 and thereafter are entitled to dividend equivalents while the underlying shares are unissued.
Dividend equivalents are subject to forfeiture, similar to the terms of the underlying stock-based awards, and are payable in cash generally at the time of conversion of the underlying shares into our common stock. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we accrued
$228,000
of dividend equivalents and paid out
$164,000
. Such amounts were recorded as a reduction to retained earnings. As of
April 30, 2017
and
July 31, 2016
, accrued dividend equivalents were
$521,000
and
$457,000
, respectively.
Cash payments to remit employees' minimum statutory tax withholding requirements related to the net settlement of stock-based awards for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
were
$244,000
and
$74,000
, respectively, which is reported as a cash outflow from operating activities in the accrued expenses and other current liabilities line item in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each respective period.
(14)
Customer and Geographic Information
Sales by geography and customer type, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, are as follows:
|
|
Three months ended April 30,
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
U.S. government
|
32.0
|
%
|
41.9
|
%
|
33.1
|
%
|
41.8
|
%
|
||||
|
Domestic
|
41.3
|
%
|
35.2
|
%
|
37.9
|
%
|
26.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Total United States
|
73.3
|
%
|
77.1
|
%
|
71.0
|
%
|
67.8
|
%
|
||||
|
International
|
26.7
|
%
|
22.9
|
%
|
29.0
|
%
|
32.2
|
%
|
||||
|
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||
22
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Sales to U.S. government customers include the Department of Defense ("DoD") and intelligence and civilian agencies, as well as sales directly to or through prime contractors. Domestic sales include sales to U.S. state and local governments.
International sales for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
(which include sales to U.S. domestic companies for inclusion in products that will be sold to international customers) were $
34,131,000
and
$28,417,000
, respectively. International sales for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
(which include sales to U.S. domestic companies for inclusion in products that will be sold to international customers) were
$116,588,000
and
$83,401,000
, respectively.
For the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, except for the U.S. government,
no
other customer or individual country (including sales to U.S. domestic companies for inclusion in products that will be sold to a foreign country) represented more than
10%
of consolidated net sales.
(15)
Segment Information
Reportable operating segments are determined based on Comtech’s management approach. The management approach, as defined by FASB ASC 280 "Segment Reporting" is based on the way that the chief operating decision-maker ("CODM") organizes the segments within an enterprise for making decisions about resources to be allocated and assessing their performance. Our CODM, for purposes of FASB ASC 280, is our Chief Executive Officer and President.
Our Commercial Solutions segment serves commercial customers and smaller government customers, such as state and local governments, that require advanced communications technologies to meet their needs. This segment also serves certain large government customers (including the U.S. government) when they have requirements for off-the-shelf commercial equipment. Commercial solutions products include satellite earth station communications equipment such as modems and traveling wave tube amplifiers, public safety technologies including those that are utilized in next generation 911 systems and enterprise technologies such as trusted location and text-messaging platforms.
Our Government Solutions segment serves large U.S. and foreign government end-users that require mission critical technologies and systems. Government solutions products include command and control technologies (such as remote sensing tracking systems, rugged solid state drives, land mobile products and quick deploy satellite systems), troposcatter technologies systems (such as digital troposcatter multiplexers, digital over-the-horizon modems, troposcatter systems and frequency converter systems) and RF power and switching technologies products (such as solid-state high-power narrow and broadband amplifiers, enhanced position location reporting system ("EPLRS") amplifier assemblies, identification friend or foe amplifiers and amplifiers used in the counteraction of improvised explosive devices).
Our CODM primarily uses a metric that we refer to as Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA") to measure an operating segment’s performance and to make decisions about resources to be allocated. Our Adjusted EBITDA metric does not consider any allocation of the following: income taxes, interest income and other expense, interest expense, amortization of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangibles, depreciation expense, acquisition plan expenses, lower than estimated losses associated with the settlement of TCS intellectual property matters or strategic alternatives analysis expenses and other. These items, while periodically affecting our results, may vary significantly from period to period and may have a disproportionate effect in a given period, thereby affecting the comparability of results. Adjusted EBITDA is used by management in assessing the Company's operating results. Although closely aligned, the Company's definition of Adjusted EBITDA is different than the Consolidated EBITDA (as such term is defined in our Secured Credit Facility) utilized for financial covenant calculations and also may differ from the definition of Adjusted EBITDA used by other companies (including TCS prior to our acquisition) and, therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
23
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Operating segment information, along with a reconciliation of segment net income (loss) and consolidated net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA is presented in the tables below:
|
|
Three months ended April 30, 2017
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
79,409,000
|
|
48,383,000
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
127,792,000
|
|
||||
|
Operating income
|
$
|
8,633,000
|
|
1,313,000
|
|
204,000
|
|
$
|
10,150,000
|
|
||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
8,506,000
|
|
1,314,000
|
|
(5,403,000
|
)
|
$
|
4,417,000
|
|
||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
27,000
|
|
—
|
|
2,857,000
|
|
2,884,000
|
|
||||||
|
Interest (income) and other expense
|
51,000
|
|
—
|
|
37,000
|
|
88,000
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
49,000
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
2,713,000
|
|
2,761,000
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
991,000
|
|
991,000
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
4,425,000
|
|
1,043,000
|
|
—
|
|
5,468,000
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation
|
2,425,000
|
|
752,000
|
|
355,000
|
|
3,532,000
|
|
||||||
|
Settlement of intellectual property litigation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2,041,000
|
)
|
(2,041,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
15,483,000
|
|
3,108,000
|
|
(491,000
|
)
|
$
|
18,100,000
|
|
||||
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
$
|
1,893,000
|
|
179,000
|
|
4,000
|
|
$
|
2,076,000
|
|
||||
|
Total assets at April 30, 2017
|
$
|
619,215,000
|
|
184,764,000
|
|
59,779,000
|
|
$
|
863,758,000
|
|
||||
|
|
Three months ended April 30, 2016
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
71,985,000
|
|
52,202,000
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
124,187,000
|
|
||||
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
6,560,000
|
|
5,629,000
|
|
(25,586,000
|
)
|
$
|
(13,397,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
6,437,000
|
|
5,634,000
|
|
(26,426,000
|
)
|
$
|
(14,355,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
2,000
|
|
—
|
|
(2,512,000
|
)
|
(2,510,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Interest (income) and other expense
|
53,000
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
(53,000
|
)
|
(5,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
68,000
|
|
—
|
|
3,405,000
|
|
3,473,000
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,041,000
|
|
1,041,000
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
3,622,000
|
|
1,154,000
|
|
—
|
|
4,776,000
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation
|
2,130,000
|
|
647,000
|
|
305,000
|
|
3,082,000
|
|
||||||
|
Acquisition plan expenses
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
16,960,000
|
|
16,960,000
|
|
||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
12,312,000
|
|
7,430,000
|
|
(7,280,000
|
)
|
$
|
12,462,000
|
|
||||
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
$
|
1,119,000
|
|
142,000
|
|
339,000
|
|
$
|
1,600,000
|
|
||||
|
Long-lived assets acquired in connection with the TCS acquisition
|
$
|
353,729,000
|
|
76,681,000
|
|
4,359,000
|
|
$
|
434,769,000
|
|
||||
|
Total assets at April 30, 2016
|
$
|
616,247,000
|
|
209,278,000
|
|
77,803,000
|
|
$
|
903,328,000
|
|
||||
24
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine months ended April 30, 2017
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
237,690,000
|
|
164,916,000
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
402,606,000
|
|
||||
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
17,595,000
|
|
6,151,000
|
|
(1,475,000
|
)
|
$
|
22,271,000
|
|
||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
17,249,000
|
|
6,179,000
|
|
(14,915,000
|
)
|
$
|
8,513,000
|
|
||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
185,000
|
|
—
|
|
4,623,000
|
|
4,808,000
|
|
||||||
|
Interest (income) and other expense
|
(11,000
|
)
|
(26,000
|
)
|
49,000
|
|
12,000
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
172,000
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
8,768,000
|
|
8,938,000
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,980,000
|
|
2,980,000
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
13,274,000
|
|
4,281,000
|
|
—
|
|
17,555,000
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation
|
7,441,000
|
|
2,255,000
|
|
1,153,000
|
|
10,849,000
|
|
||||||
|
Settlement of intellectual property litigation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(12,020,000
|
)
|
(12,020,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
38,310,000
|
|
12,687,000
|
|
(9,362,000
|
)
|
$
|
41,635,000
|
|
||||
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
$
|
5,540,000
|
|
602,000
|
|
81,000
|
|
$
|
6,223,000
|
|
||||
|
Total assets at April 30, 2017
|
$
|
619,215,000
|
|
184,764,000
|
|
59,779,000
|
|
$
|
863,758,000
|
|
||||
|
|
Nine months ended April 30, 2016
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$
|
165,657,000
|
|
92,970,000
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
258,627,000
|
|
||||
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
14,048,000
|
|
15,389,000
|
|
(37,477,000
|
)
|
$
|
(8,040,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
13,635,000
|
|
15,409,000
|
|
(39,484,000
|
)
|
$
|
(10,440,000
|
)
|
||||
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
94,000
|
|
—
|
|
(1,088,000
|
)
|
(994,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Interest (income) and other expense
|
103,000
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
(310,000
|
)
|
(227,000
|
)
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
216,000
|
|
—
|
|
3,405,000
|
|
3,621,000
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,166,000
|
|
3,166,000
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
6,194,000
|
|
1,154,000
|
|
—
|
|
7,348,000
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation
|
4,568,000
|
|
1,189,000
|
|
321,000
|
|
6,078,000
|
|
||||||
|
Acquisition plan expenses
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20,689,000
|
|
20,689,000
|
|
||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
24,810,000
|
|
17,732,000
|
|
(13,301,000
|
)
|
$
|
29,241,000
|
|
||||
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
$
|
2,067,000
|
|
642,000
|
|
354,000
|
|
$
|
3,063,000
|
|
||||
|
Long-lived assets acquired in connection with the TCS acquisition
|
$
|
353,729,000
|
|
76,681,000
|
|
4,359,000
|
|
$
|
434,769,000
|
|
||||
|
Total assets at April 30, 2016
|
$
|
616,247,000
|
|
209,278,000
|
|
77,803,000
|
|
$
|
903,328,000
|
|
||||
Unallocated expenses result from corporate expenses such as executive compensation, accounting, legal and other regulatory compliance related costs. In addition, during fiscal 2017, unallocated expenses also reflect the favorable adjustments to operating income related to the settlement of certain legacy TCS intellectual property matters. During fiscal 2016, unallocated expenses include acquisition plan expenses, most of which related to the February 23, 2016 acquisition of TCS.
25
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Interest expense for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2017
includes
$2,641,000
and
$8,524,000
, respectively, related to our Secured Credit Facility. Interest expense for both the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2016
includes
$2,981,000
related to our Secured Credit Facility. Such interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs. See
Note (10) -
“
Secured Credit Facility,
” for further discussion of such debt.
Intersegment sales for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
by the Commercial Solutions segment to the Government Solutions segment were
$2,812,000
and
$2,198,000
, respectively. Intersegment sales for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
by the Commercial Solutions segment to the Government Solutions segment were
$9,297,000
and
$4,082,000
, respectively. There were nominal sales by the Government Solutions segment to the Commercial Solutions segment for these periods.
Unallocated assets at
April 30, 2017
consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, income taxes receivable, corporate property, plant and equipment and deferred financing costs. Substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the U.S. and all intersegment sales are eliminated in consolidation and are excluded from the tables above.
(16)
Goodwill
The following table represents the amount of goodwill by reportable operating segment, including the changes in the net carrying value of goodwill during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
:
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
Balance as of July 31, 2016
|
$
|
229,273,000
|
|
58,345,000
|
|
$
|
287,618,000
|
|
|||
|
Changes resulting from TCS acquisition
|
2,167,000
|
|
848,000
|
|
3,015,000
|
|
|||||
|
Balance as of April 30, 2017
|
$
|
231,440,000
|
|
59,193,000
|
|
$
|
290,633,000
|
|
|||
See
Note (2) - “Acquisition
” for further discussion of the TCS acquisition.
In accordance with FASB ASC 350, we perform a goodwill impairment analysis at least annually (in the first quarter of each fiscal year), unless indicators of impairment exist in interim periods. If we fail the Step One test, we would do a Step Two test which compares the carrying value of the reporting unit to the fair value of all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit (including any unrecognized intangibles) as if the reporting unit was acquired in a business combination. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
On
August 1, 2016
(the first day of our fiscal
2017
), we performed our annual quantitative assessment (commonly referred to as a Step One test) using market participant assumptions to determine if the fair value of each of our reporting units with goodwill exceeded its carrying value. In making this assessment, we considered, among other things, expectations of projected net sales and cash flows, assumptions impacting the weighted average cost of capital, trends in trading multiples of comparable companies, changes in our stock price and changes in the carrying values of our reporting units with goodwill. We also considered overall business conditions, including, among other things, the fact that the end-markets for certain of our products and services have been significantly impacted by adverse global economic conditions. We believe that business conditions will improve over time.
26
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
In performing Step One of the goodwill impairment test, we estimated the fair value of each of our reporting units using a combination of the income and market approaches. The income approach, also known as the discounted cash flow ("DCF") method, utilizes the present value of cash flows to estimate fair value. The future cash flows for our reporting units were projected based on our estimates, at that time, of future revenues, operating income and other factors (such as working capital and capital expenditures). We assumed revenue growth rates based on our actual long-term expectations. The discount rates used in our DCF method were based on a weighted-average cost of capital ("WACC") determined from relevant market comparisons, adjusted upward for specific reporting unit risks (primarily the uncertainty of achieving projected operating cash flows). A terminal value growth rate was applied to the final year of the projected period and reflected our estimate of stable, perpetual growth. We then calculated a present value of the respective cash flows for each reporting unit to arrive at an estimate of fair value under the income approach. Under the market approach, we estimated a fair value based on comparable companies' market multiples of revenues and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and factored in a control premium. Finally, we compared our estimates of fair values to our August 1, 2016 total public market capitalization and assessed implied control premiums based on our common stock price of
$13.43
as of
August 1, 2016
.
Based on our quantitative evaluation, we determined that our Commercial Solutions and Government Solutions reporting units had estimated fair values in excess of their carrying values of at least
11.8%
and
40.5%
, respectively, and concluded that our goodwill was not impaired. As such, we did not perform a Step Two assessment and concluded that neither of our
two
reporting units was at risk of failing the Step One test as prescribed under the FASB ASC. However, in order to sensitize our goodwill impairment test, we performed a second analysis using only the income approach and concluded that neither reporting units' goodwill was impaired.
Based on year-to-date performance and our business outlook, both our Commercial Solutions and Government Solutions reporting units are not expected to achieve the level of net sales or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for fiscal 2017 that were assumed for purposes of our August 1, 2016 impairment test. Nevertheless, we have experienced: (i) higher than expected gross margins in our Commercial Solutions reporting unit, which benefited this reporting unit’s cash flow projections for fiscal 2017; (ii) an improvement in overall working capital requirements that we believe is sustainable for both our reporting units and which results in a benefit to both reporting units' cash flow projections for fiscal 2017 and beyond; and (iii) an increase in our total public market capitalization since August 1, 2016. Furthermore, the carrying value of assets for each reporting unit has significantly declined due to the amortization of finite lived intangible assets. Accordingly, we continue to believe that our long-term financial goals will be achieved. As a result of the aforementioned items, no events or circumstances indicating the potential for goodwill impairment were identified during the three months ended April 30, 2017.
However, it is possible that, during the remainder of fiscal
2017
or beyond, business conditions (both in the U.S. and internationally) could deteriorate from the current state, our current or prospective customers could materially postpone, reduce or even forgo purchases of our products and services to a greater extent than we currently anticipate, or our common stock price could decline. A significant decline in our customers' spending that is greater than we anticipate or a shift in funding priorities may also have a negative effect on future orders, sales, income and cash flows and we might be required to perform an interim Step One goodwill impairment test during the remainder of fiscal
2017
or beyond. If assumed net sales and cash flow projections are not achieved or our common stock price significantly declines from current levels, our Commercial Solutions and Government Solutions reporting units could be at risk of failing Step One of the goodwill impairment test and goodwill and intangibles assigned to the respective reporting units could be impaired.
In any event, we are required to perform the next annual goodwill impairment analysis on
August 1, 2017
(the start of our fiscal
2018
). If our assumptions and related estimates change in the future, or if we change our reporting unit structure or other events and circumstances change (e.g., a sustained decrease in the price of our common stock (considered on both absolute terms and relative to peers)), we may be required to record impairment charges when we perform these tests, or in other future periods. In addition to our impairment analysis of goodwill, we also review net intangible assets with finite lives when an event occurs indicating the potential for impairment. We believe that the carrying values of our net intangible assets were recoverable as of
April 30, 2017
. Any impairment charges that we may record in the future could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.
27
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
(17)
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets with finite lives are as follows:
|
|
As of April 30, 2017
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Weighted Average
Amortization Period
|
Gross Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net Carrying
Amount
|
|||||||||
|
Customer relationships
|
20.3
|
$
|
249,831,000
|
|
38,567,000
|
|
$
|
211,264,000
|
|
||||
|
Technologies
|
12.3
|
82,370,000
|
|
47,182,000
|
|
35,188,000
|
|
||||||
|
Trademarks and other
|
16.4
|
28,894,000
|
|
8,207,000
|
|
20,687,000
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
|
$
|
361,095,000
|
|
93,956,000
|
|
$
|
267,139,000
|
|
||||
|
|
As of July 31, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Weighted Average
Amortization Period
|
Gross Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net Carrying
Amount
|
|||||||||
|
Customer relationships
|
20.3
|
$
|
249,831,000
|
|
28,497,000
|
|
$
|
221,334,000
|
|
||||
|
Technologies
|
12.3
|
82,370,000
|
|
42,860,000
|
|
39,510,000
|
|
||||||
|
Trademarks and other
|
16.3
|
28,894,000
|
|
5,044,000
|
|
23,850,000
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
|
$
|
361,095,000
|
|
76,401,000
|
|
$
|
284,694,000
|
|
||||
The weighted average amortization period in the above table excludes fully amortized intangible assets.
Amortization expense for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
was
$5,468,000
and
$4,776,000
, respectively. Amortization expense for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
was
$17,555,000
and
$7,348,000
, respectively.
Intangible assets at
April 30, 2017
, and the associated amortization expense for the
three and nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, include the impact of the TCS acquisition which closed on February 23, 2016 and which is further discussed in
Note (2) -
"
Acquisition.
"
The estimated amortization expense consists of the following for the fiscal years ending July 31,:
|
2017
|
$
|
22,823,000
|
|
|
2018
|
21,075,000
|
|
|
|
2019
|
17,155,000
|
|
|
|
2020
|
17,155,000
|
|
|
|
2021
|
16,196,000
|
|
|
(18)
Stockholders’ Equity
Sale of Common Stock
In June 2016, the Company sold
7,145,000
shares of its common stock in a public offering at a price to the public of
$14.00
per share, resulting in proceeds to the Company of
$95,029,000
, net of underwriting discounts and commissions. As of
April 30, 2017
and
June 7, 2017
, an aggregate registered amount of
$74,970,000
under the Company's existing Shelf Registration Statement filed with the SEC remains available for sale of various types of securities, including debt.
Stock Repurchase Program
As of
April 30, 2017
and
June 7, 2017
, we were authorized to repurchase up to an additional
$8,664,000
of our common stock, pursuant to our current
$100,000,000
stock repurchase program. Our stock repurchase program has no time restrictions and repurchases may be made in open-market or privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. There were
no
repurchases made during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
or
2016
.
28
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Dividends
Since September 2010, we have paid quarterly dividends pursuant to an annual targeted dividend amount that was established by our Board of Directors. On
October 6, 2016
, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.30
per common share, which was paid on
November 22, 2016
. On both
December 7, 2016
and March 8, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.10
per common share, which were paid on
February 17, 2017
and May 18, 2017, respectively. On
June 7, 2017
, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.10
per common share, payable on
August 18, 2017
to stockholders of record at the close of business on
July 17, 2017
.
Future dividends remain subject to compliance with financial covenants under our Secured Credit Facility as well as Board approval.
(19)
Legal Proceedings and Other Matters
Legacy TCS Intellectual Property Matter - Vehicle IP
In December 2009, Vehicle IP, LLC ("Vehicle IP") filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (the "District Court"), seeking monetary damages, fees and expenses and other relief from, among others, our customer Verizon Wireless ("Verizon"), based on the VZ Navigator product, and TCS is defending Verizon against Vehicle IP. In 2013, the District Court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the basis that the products in question did not infringe plaintiff’s patent. Plaintiff appealed that decision and, in 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the District Court's claim construction, overturned the District Court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement, and remanded the case for further proceedings. Fact discovery and expert discovery has closed. Substantive settlement conversations have occurred but, to date, the parties have been unable to reach a settlement. As discussed in
Note (8) - “Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities,"
we have accrued certain legal and settlement costs related to the Vehicle IP matter. The accrued settlement costs related to this matter do not reflect the final amounts we actually may pay, if any.
On May 30, 2017, we received positive news that the District Court issued a supplemental claim construction order in our favor. As a result, the Plaintiff agreed to file a joint status report to the District Court that requested that the District Court cancel the trial date (which is currently scheduled for July 2017) as the parties expect to enter a stipulation that the defendants’ accused products do not infringe Vehicle IP’s patent under the District Court’s current revised construction of the disputed patent claim term.
Following entry of such stipulation of noninfringement, we believe that Vehicle IP will appeal the related claim construction for which an appellate ruling may take a year or so to be issued. If the District Court's current claim construction is ultimately upheld at the appellate level, it is possible that we may not have to go to trial or pay any monetary damages.
Ongoing legal expenses associated with defending this matter and its ultimate resolution could vary and have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows in future periods.
29
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Final Settlements of Certain TCS Intellectual Property Matters and Mississippi Lawsuit
During the nine months ended April 30, 2017, we entered into final settlements of certain legacy TCS intellectual property matters and a separate lawsuit filed in Mississippi. The settlement of these matters and their impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements are described below:
TracBeam
- On January 30, 2017, we entered into a final settlement of a legacy TCS patent infringement litigation matter which resulted in a lower loss than originally estimated. The final settlement resolved litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“Eastern District Court”) in which TracBeam, LLC ("TracBeam") asserted a patent infringement claim and sought damages, fees and expenses and other relief from, among others, TCS’s customers T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc. (together, "T-Mobile"), based on the defendants’ E911 service and locator products. TCS was defending T-Mobile against TracBeam.The final settlement required that we make two cash payments, one of which occurred during the
three months ended April 30, 2017
with a final payment made in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. On a GAAP basis, the final settlement resulted in a favorable
$9,979,000
contribution, net of estimated legal fees, to operating income for the second quarter of fiscal 2017. In addition to the final settlement, during our third quarter of fiscal
2017
, TCS settled its claims against a prior owner of the TCS assets that were the subject of the TracBeam infringement claim and we received cash settlement proceeds that were recorded as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses during the third quarter of fiscal 2017. As a result, our total net cash outflow related to the final resolution of the entire TracBeam matter was immaterial.
CallWave
-
In 2012, CallWave Communication LLC ("CallWave") brought a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware seeking damages, fees and expenses and other relief from, among others, Verizon Wireless and certain of its affiliates (collectively, "Verizon"), based on Verizon's VZ Family Locator and VZ Navigator products, and TCS had previously agreed to indemnify Verizon subject to certain conditions. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, a final settlement was entered into between TCS and CallWave and, on a GAAP basis, the resolution of this matter resulted in a favorable
$2,041,000
contribution, net of estimated legal fees, to operating income for the third quarter of fiscal 2017. Cash payments related to this final settlement are immaterial and principally occurred during the
three months ended April 30, 2017
.
Mississippi Lawsuit
- A family in Mississippi sued Verizon Wireless in June 2016 and TCS in July 2016 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, for damages resulting from allegations that their 911 calls were improperly routed during an emergency. Both TCS and Verizon denied the allegations. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, a final settlement was reached on terms that had no impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements and the case was dismissed.
Other Matters
In October 2014, we disclosed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) that we learned during a self-assessment of our export transactions that a shipment of modems sent to a Canadian customer by Comtech EF Data was incorporated into a communication system, the ultimate end user of which was the Sudan Civil Aviation Authority. The sales value of this equipment was approximately
$288,000
. OFAC regulations prohibit U.S. persons from doing business directly or indirectly with Sudan. In late 2015, OFAC issued an administrative subpoena seeking further information about the disclosed transaction. We have responded to the subpoena, including alerting OFAC to Comtech’s repair of three modems for a customer in Lebanon who may have rerouted the modems from Lebanon to Sudan without the required U.S. licensing authorization. We are not able to predict when OFAC will complete its review, nor whether it will take any action against us, which could include civil and criminal penalties. If OFAC determines that we have violated U.S. trade sanctions, we may suffer reputational harm. Even though we take precautions to avoid engaging in transactions that may violate U.S. trade sanctions, those measures may not be effective in every instance.
There are certain other pending and threatened legal actions which arise in the normal course of business. Although the ultimate outcome of litigation is difficult to accurately predict, we believe that the outcome of these other pending and threatened actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
30
|
ITEM 2.
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
|
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including but not limited to, information relating to our future performance and financial condition, plans and objectives of our management and our assumptions regarding such future performance, financial condition, and plans and objectives that involve certain significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors not under our control which may cause our actual results, future performance and financial condition, and achievement of our plans and objectives to be materially different from the results, performance or other expectations implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things: the possibility that the expected synergies from the acquisition of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. ("TCS") will not be fully realized, or will not be realized within the anticipated time period; the possibility of disruption from the acquisition, making it more difficult to maintain business and operational relationships or retain key personnel; the risk that Comtech will be unsuccessful in implementing a tactical shift in its Government Solutions segment away from bidding on large commodity service contracts and toward pursuing contracts for its niche products with higher margins; the nature and timing of receipt of, and our performance on, new or existing orders that can cause significant fluctuations in net sales and operating results; the timing and funding of government contracts; adjustments to gross profits on long-term contracts; risks associated with international sales; rapid technological change; evolving industry standards; new product announcements and enhancements, including the risks associated with Comtech's recent launch of its new Heights
TM
Dynamic Network Access Technology ("HEIGHTS"); changing customer demands; changes in prevailing economic and political conditions; changes in the price of oil in global markets; changes in foreign currency exchange rates; risks associated with Comtech's and TCS's legacy legal proceedings, customer claims for indemnification, and other similar matters; risks associated with our obligations under our Secured Credit Facility, as amended; risks associated with our large contracts; and other factors described in this and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of advanced communications solutions for both commercial and government customers worldwide. Our solutions fulfill our customers’ needs for secure wireless communications in some of the most demanding environments, including those where traditional communications are unavailable or cost-prohibitive, and in mission-critical and other scenarios where performance is crucial.
Acquisition of TCS
On February 23, 2016 (the first month of our third quarter of fiscal 2016), we acquired TCS, a leading provider of commercial solutions (such as public safety systems and enterprise application technologies), and government solutions (such as command and control (also known as Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (“C4ISR”))) applications. We believe that the acquisition of TCS provides us with a number of key strategic and financial benefits including:
|
•
|
The creation of scale and a more diversified earnings stream, reducing volatility associated with challenging international (including emerging markets) business conditions;
|
|
•
|
Entry into commercial markets at growth inflection points, including the public safety market which has a growing need for next generation emergency 911 systems that utilize messaging and trusted location technologies;
|
|
•
|
An enhanced position with existing customers, including the U.S. government, for which Comtech is now a prime contractor, including for sales of our over-the-horizon microwave systems (troposcatter) products; and
|
|
•
|
The ability to obtain meaningful cost synergies and better growth prospects.
|
31
The TCS acquisition was a significant step in our strategy of entering complementary markets and expanding our domestic and international commercial offerings. In connection with the acquisition, we began managing our combined businesses through two reportable operating segments:
|
•
|
Commercial Solutions
- serves commercial customers and smaller government customers, such as state and local governments, that require advanced communication technologies to meet their needs. This segment also serves certain large government customers (including the U.S. government) that have requirements for off-the-shelf commercial equipment. We believe this segment is a leading provider of satellite communications (such as satellite earth station modems and traveling wave tube amplifiers ("TWTA")), public safety systems (such as next generation 911 ("NG911") technologies) and enterprise application technologies (such as a messaging and trusted location-based technologies).
|
|
•
|
Government Solutions
- serves large government end-users (including those of foreign countries) that require mission critical technologies and systems. We believe this segment is a leading provider of command and control applications (such as the design, installation and operation of data networks that integrate computing and communications (including both satellite and terrestrial links)) ongoing network operation and management support services (including telecom expense management, project management and fielding and maintenance solutions related to satellite ground terminals), troposcatter communications (such as digital troposcatter multiplexers, digital over-the-horizon modems, troposcatter systems, and frequency converter systems) and RF power and switching technologies (such as solid state high-power broadband amplifiers, enhanced position location reporting system (commonly known as "EPLRS") amplifier assemblies, identification friend or foe amplifiers, and amplifiers used in the counteraction of improvised explosive devices).
|
Upon closing the acquisition of TCS on February 23, 2016, we immediately implemented our acquisition integration plan which includes fully integrating TCS into our business model to achieve cost synergies. We have completed our acquisition integration plan and have achieved synergies related to reductions in public company costs, reduced spending on maintaining multiple information technology systems and increased operating efficiencies throughout the combined company.
Our Quarterly Financial Information
Quarterly and period-to-period sales and operating results may be significantly affected by either short-term or long-term contracts with our customers. In addition, our gross profit is affected by a variety of factors, including the mix of products, systems and services sold, production efficiencies, estimates of warranty expense, price competition and general economic conditions. Our gross profit may also be affected by the impact of any cumulative adjustments to contracts that are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method.
Our contracts with the U.S. government can be terminated for convenience by it at any time and orders are subject to unpredictable funding, deployment and technology decisions by the U.S. government. Some of these contracts are indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity ("IDIQ") contracts and, as such, the U.S. government is not obligated to purchase any equipment or services under these contracts. We have, in the past, experienced and we continue to expect significant fluctuations in sales and operating results from quarter-to-quarter and period-to-period. As such, comparisons between periods and our current results may not be indicative of a trend or future performance.
Given the full integration of TCS into our business and the joint marketing of our products, historical sales patterns and mix trends are becoming less relevant. As a result, period-to-period comparisons of sales, margins, operating income and Adjusted EBITDA contributions between TCS and Comtech legacy products will not be meaningful.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We consider certain accounting policies to be critical due to the estimation process involved in each.
Revenue Recognition.
We earn revenue from the sale of advanced communication solutions to customers around the world. Sales of advanced communication solutions can consist of any one or a combination of items required by our customer including hardware, technology platforms and related support. A large portion of our revenue from advanced communication solutions is derived from contracts relating to the design, development or manufacture of complex electronic equipment to a buyer’s specification or to provide services relating to the performance of such contracts and is recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 605-35. For these contracts, we primarily apply the percentage-of-completion accounting method and generally recognize revenue based on the relationship of total costs incurred to total projected costs, or, alternatively, based on output measures, such as units delivered or produced. Profits expected to be realized on such contracts are based on total estimated sales for the contract compared to total estimated costs, including warranty costs, at completion of the contract.
32
Direct costs which include materials, labor and overhead are charged to work-in-progress (including our contracts-in-progress) inventory or cost of sales. Indirect costs relating to long-term contracts, which include expenses such as general and administrative, are charged to expense as incurred and are not included in our work-in-process (including our contracts-in-progress) inventory or cost of sales. Total estimates are reviewed and revised periodically throughout the lives of the contracts, and adjustments to profits resulting from such revisions are made cumulative to the date of the change. Estimated losses on long-term contracts are recorded in the period in which the losses become evident. Long-term U.S. government cost-reimbursable type contracts are also specifically covered by FASB ASC 605-35.
We have been engaged in the production and delivery of goods and services on a continual basis under contractual arrangements for many years. Historically, we have demonstrated an ability to accurately estimate total revenues and total expenses relating to our long-term contracts. However, there exist inherent risks and uncertainties in estimating revenues, expenses and progress toward completion, particularly on larger or longer-term contracts. If we do not accurately estimate the total sales, related costs and progress towards completion on such contracts, the estimated gross margins may be significantly impacted or losses may need to be recognized in future periods. Any such resulting changes in margins or contract losses could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, most government contracts have termination for convenience clauses that provide the customer with the right to terminate the contract at any time. Such terminations could impact the assumptions regarding total contract revenues and expenses utilized in recognizing profit under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Changes to these assumptions could materially impact our results of operations and financial condition. Historically, we have not experienced material terminations of our long-term contracts. We also address customer acceptance provisions in assessing our ability to perform our contractual obligations under long-term contracts. Our inability to perform on our long-term contracts could materially impact our results of operations and financial condition. Historically, we have been able to perform on our long-term contracts.
We also derive a portion of our revenues for advanced communication solutions from contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recorded on delivery of products or performance of services. Such revenues are recognized in accordance with the authoritative guidance contained in FASB ASC 605-25, "Revenue Recognition - Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements" ("FASB ASC 605-25") and, as applicable, FASB ASC 605-20 "Revenue Recognition - Services" ("FASB ASC 605-20") and Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2009-14 (FASB ASC Topic 985) "Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements." Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements requires judgment to determine if multiple elements exist, whether elements can be accounted for as separate units of accounting, and if so, the fair value for each of the elements. In summary, we recognize revenue for each separate unit of accounting when the applicable revenue recognition criteria for each element have been met. We allocate revenue to each separate unit of accounting in a multi-element arrangement based on the relative fair value of each element, using vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of their fair values, if available. VSOE is generally determined based on the price charged when an element is sold separately. In the absence of VSOE of fair value, the fee is allocated among each element based on third-party evidence ("TPE") of fair value, which is determined based on competitor pricing for similar deliverables when sold separately. When we are unable to establish fair value using VSOE or TPE, we use estimated selling price ("ESP") to allocate value to each element. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the product or service were sold separately. We determine ESP for deliverables by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, prices we charge for similar offerings, market conditions, competitive landscape, and pricing practices. For multiple element arrangements that contain only software and software-related elements, we allocate the fees to each element based on the VSOE of fair value of each element. Due to the nature of some of the agreements it may be difficult to establish VSOE of separate elements of an agreement; in these circumstances the appropriate recognition of revenue may require the use of judgment based on the particular facts and circumstances.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
.
As discussed further in
“Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note (13) - Stock-Based Compensation,”
we issue stock-based awards to certain of our employees and our Board of Directors and we recognize related stock-based compensation for both equity and liability-classified stock-based awards in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
We have used and expect to continue to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to compute the estimated fair value of certain stock-based awards. The Black-Scholes option pricing model includes assumptions regarding dividend yield, expected volatility, expected option term and risk-free interest rates. The expected dividend yield is the expected annual dividend as a percentage of the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. We estimate expected volatility by considering the historical volatility of our stock and the implied volatility of publicly-traded call options on our stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for an instrument which closely approximates the expected term. The expected term is the number of years we estimate that awards will be outstanding prior to exercise and is determined by employee groups with sufficiently distinct behavior patterns.
33
The assumptions used in computing the fair value of stock-based awards reflect our best estimates, but involve uncertainties relating to market and other conditions, many of which are outside of our control. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by the recipients of stock-based awards. As a result, if other assumptions or estimates had been used, stock-based compensation expense that was recorded could have been materially different. Furthermore, if different assumptions are used in future periods, stock-based compensation expense could be materially impacted in the future.
Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
.
As of
April 30, 2017
, total goodwill recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet aggregated
$290.6
million (of which
$231.4
million relates to our Commercial Solutions segment and
$59.2
million relates to our Government Solutions segment). Additionally, as of
April 30, 2017
, intangible assets recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet aggregated
$267.1 million
(of which
$221.1
million relates to our Commercial Solutions segment and
$46.0
million relates to our Government Solutions segment). Each of our two operating segments constitutes a reporting unit and we must make various assumptions in determining their estimated fair values.
In accordance with FASB ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,” we perform a goodwill impairment analysis at least annually (in the first quarter of each fiscal year), unless indicators of impairment exist in interim periods. If we fail the Step One test, we would do a Step Two test which compares the carrying value of each reporting unit to the fair value of all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit (including any unrecognized intangibles) as if the reporting unit was acquired in a business combination. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
On August 1,
2016
(the first day of our fiscal
2017
), we performed our annual quantitative assessment (commonly referred to as a Step One test) using market participant assumptions to determine if the fair value of each of our reporting units with goodwill exceeded its carrying value. In making this assessment, we considered, among other things, expectations of projected net sales and cash flows, assumptions impacting the weighted average cost of capital, trends in trading multiples of comparable companies, changes in our stock price and changes in the carrying values of our reporting units with goodwill. We also considered overall business conditions including, among other things, the fact that the end-markets for certain of our products and services have been significantly impacted by adverse global economic conditions. We believe that business conditions will improve over time.
In performing Step One of the goodwill impairment test, we estimated the fair value of each of our reporting units using a combination of the income and market approaches. The income approach, also known as the discounted cash flow ("DCF") method, utilizes the present value of cash flows to estimate fair value. The future cash flows for our reporting units were projected based on our estimates, at that time, of future revenues, operating income and other factors (such as working capital and capital expenditures). We assumed revenue growth rates based on our actual long-term expectations. The discount rates used in our DCF method were based on a weighted-average cost of capital ("WACC") determined from relevant market comparisons, adjusted upward for specific reporting unit risks (primarily the uncertainty of achieving projected operating cash flows). A terminal value growth rate was applied to the final year of the projected period and reflected our estimate of stable, perpetual growth. We then calculated a present value of the respective cash flows for each reporting unit to arrive at an estimate of fair value under the income approach. Under the market approach, we estimated a fair value based on comparable companies' market multiples of revenues and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and factored in a control premium. Finally, we compared our estimates of fair values to our August 1,
2016
total public market capitalization and assessed implied control premiums based on our common stock price of
$13.43
as of
August 1, 2016
.
Based on our quantitative evaluation, we determined that our Commercial Solutions and Government Solutions reporting units had estimated fair values in excess of their carrying values of at least 11.8% and 40.5%, respectively, and concluded that our goodwill was not impaired. As such, we did not perform a Step Two assessment and concluded that neither of our two reporting units was at risk of failing the Step One test as prescribed under the FASB ASC. However, in order to sensitize our goodwill impairment test, we performed a second analysis using only the income approach and concluded that neither reporting units' goodwill was impaired. Under the second analysis, if we do not achieve assumed net sales and cash flow projections in future periods, our Commercial Solutions reporting unit's goodwill would be at risk of impairment. Based on year-to-date performance and our business outlook, both our Commercial Solutions and Government Solutions reporting units are not expected to achieve the level of net sales or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for fiscal 2017 that were assumed for purposes of our August 1, 2016 impairment test. Nevertheless, we have experienced: (i) higher than expected gross margins in our Commercial Solutions reporting unit, which benefited this reporting unit’s cash flow projections for fiscal 2017; (ii) an improvement in overall working capital requirements that we believe is sustainable for both our reporting units and which results in a benefit to both reporting units' cash flow projections for fiscal 2017 and beyond; and (iii) an increase in our total public market capitalization since August 1, 2016. Furthermore, the carrying value of assets for each reporting unit has significantly declined due to the amortization of finite lived intangible assets. Accordingly, we continue to believe that our long-term financial goals will be achieved. As a result of the aforementioned items, no events or circumstances indicating the potential for goodwill impairment were identified during the three months ended April 30, 2017.
34
However, it is possible that, during the remainder of fiscal
2017
or beyond, business conditions (both in the U.S. and internationally) could deteriorate from the current state, our current or prospective customers could materially postpone, reduce or even forgo purchases of our products and services to a greater extent than we currently anticipate or our common stock price could decline. A significant decline in our customers' spending that is greater than we anticipate or a shift in funding priorities may also have a negative effect on future orders, sales, income and cash flows and we might be required to perform an interim Step One goodwill impairment test during the remainder of fiscal
2017
or beyond. If assumed net sales and cash flow projections are not achieved or our common stock price significantly declines from current levels, our Commercial Solutions and Government Solutions reporting units could be at risk of failing Step One of the goodwill impairment test and goodwill and intangibles assigned to the respective reporting units could be impaired.
In any event, we are required to perform the next annual goodwill impairment analysis on
August 1, 2017
(the start of our fiscal
2018
). If our assumptions and related estimates change in the future, or if we change our reporting unit structure or other events and circumstances change (e.g., a sustained decrease in the price of our common stock (considered on both absolute terms and relative to peers)), we may be required to record impairment charges when we perform these tests, or in other future periods. In addition to our impairment analysis of goodwill, we also review net intangible assets with finite lives when an event occurs indicating the potential for impairment. We believe that the carrying values of our net intangible assets were recoverable
as of April 30, 2017
. Any impairment charges that we may record in the future could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.
Provision for Warranty Obligations.
We provide warranty coverage for most of our products, including products under long-term contracts, for a period of at least one year from the date of shipment. We record a liability for estimated warranty expense based on historical claims, product failure rates and other factors. Costs associated with some of our warranties that are provided under long-term contracts are incorporated into our estimates of total contract costs.
There exist inherent risks and uncertainties in estimating warranty expenses, particularly on larger or longer-term contracts. In August 2016, AT&T, a distributor of a small TCS product line that we refer to as our 911 call handling software solution, informed us that they do not believe TCS met certain contractual specifications related to performance and usability and had requested a refund of certain payments made by them as well as provide them with software changes at no additional cost. TCS has also sold this software to other customers. Our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of April 30, 2017
includes accrued costs of
$10.2 million
related to this contingent liability, net of charges incurred to date. This amount reflects a consideration of contractual obligations as well as an estimate of future costs to resolve software issues.
If we do not accurately estimate our warranty costs, any changes to our original estimates could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.
Accounting for Income Taxes.
Our deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Our provision for income taxes is based on domestic (including federal and state) and international statutory income tax rates in the tax jurisdictions where we operate, permanent differences between financial reporting and tax reporting and available credits and incentives. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The U.S. federal government is our most significant income tax jurisdiction.
Significant judgment is required in determining income tax provisions and tax positions. We may be challenged upon review by the applicable taxing authority and positions taken by us may not be sustained. We recognize all or a portion of the benefit of income tax positions only when we have made a determination that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, based upon the technical merits of the position and other factors. For tax positions that are determined as more likely than not to be sustained upon examination, the tax benefit recognized is the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The development of valuation allowances for deferred tax assets and reserves for income tax positions requires consideration of timing and judgments about future taxable income, tax issues and potential outcomes, and are subjective critical estimates. A portion of our deferred tax assets consist of federal net operating losses and federal research and experimentation tax credit carryforwards, most of which was acquired in connection with our acquisition of TCS. No valuation allowance has been established on these deferred tax assets based on our evaluation that our ability to realize such assets has met the criteria of “more likely than not.” We continuously evaluate additional facts representing positive and negative evidence in determining our ability to realize these deferred tax assets. In certain circumstances, the ultimate outcome of exposures and risks involves significant uncertainties. If actual outcomes differ materially from these estimates, they could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
35
During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we reached an effective settlement with the IRS relating to its audit of our federal income tax return for fiscal 2014. This effective settlement did not have a material impact on our results of operations. Our federal income tax returns for fiscal 2015 and 2016 are subject to potential future IRS audit. None of our state income tax returns prior to fiscal 2012 are subject to audit. TCS's federal income tax returns for tax years 2013 through 2015 and the tax period from January 1, 2016 to February 23, 2016 are subject to potential future IRS audit. None of TCS's state income tax returns prior to calendar year 2012 are subject to audit. Future tax assessments or settlements could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Research and Development Costs.
We generally expense all research and development costs. Research and development expenses include payroll, employee benefits, stock-based compensation expense, and other personnel-related expenses associated with product development. Research and development expenses also include third-party development and programming costs. Costs incurred internally in researching and developing software to be sold are charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established for the software. Judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established. Technological feasibility for our advanced communication software solutions is generally reached after all high-risk development issues have been resolved through coding and testing. Generally, this occurs shortly before the products are released to customers and when we are able to validate the marketability of such product. Once technological feasibility is established, all software costs are capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers. To date, we have not capitalized any of our internally developed software costs.
Provisions for Excess and Obsolete Inventory.
We record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and future usage trends. Other factors may also influence our provision, including decisions to exit a product line, technological change and new product development. These factors could result in a change in the amount of excess and obsolete inventory on hand. Additionally, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated or overstated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory was overvalued, we would be required to recognize such costs in our financial statements at the time of such determination. Any such charge could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.
We perform credit evaluations of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon customer payment history and current creditworthiness, as determined by our review of our customers’ current credit information. Generally, we will require cash in advance or payment secured by irrevocable letters of credit before an order is accepted from an international customer that we do not do business with regularly. In addition, we seek to obtain insurance for certain domestic and international customers.
We monitor collections and payments from our customers and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that we have identified. In light of ongoing tight credit market conditions, we continue to see requests from our customers for higher credit limits and longer payment terms. Because of our strong cash position and the nominal amount of interest we are earning on our cash and cash equivalents, we have, on a limited basis, approved certain customer requests.
We continue to monitor our accounts receivable credit portfolio. Our overall credit losses have historically been within our expectations of the allowances established. In light of the current global economic conditions, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. Measurement of credit losses requires consideration of historical loss experience, including the need to adjust for current conditions, and judgments about the probable effects of relevant observable data, including present economic conditions such as delinquency rates and the financial health of specific customers. Changes to the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.
36
Business Outlook for Fiscal
2017
During our
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
, we generated consolidated:
|
•
|
Net sales of
$127.8 million
;
|
|
•
|
Operating income of
$10.2 million
;
|
|
•
|
Net income of
$4.4 million
;
|
|
•
|
Cash flows from operating activities of $18.3 million; and
|
|
•
|
Adjusted EBITDA (a Non-GAAP financial measure discussed below) of
$18.1 million
.
|
For a definition and explanation of Adjusted EBITDA, see
“Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended April 30, 2017 and April 30, 2016 - Adjusted EBITDA”
and
“Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended April 30, 2017 and April 30, 2016 - Adjusted EBITDA.”
Our third quarter fiscal 2017 financial performance was solid and we generated significant cash flows across the board. For the
three months ended April 30, 2017
, we achieved a consolidated book-to-bill ratio (a measure defined as bookings divided by net sales) of
1.06
, which reflects strong bookings in our Government Solutions segment. As of
April 30, 2017
, we have consolidated backlog of
$461.3
million, a large portion of which is scheduled to be delivered to our customers in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2017
. Based on the anticipated timing of shipments and performance related to orders currently in our backlog, together with anticipated new orders, we expect consolidated net sales and Adjusted EBITDA in our fourth quarter to be the highest of any quarter in fiscal
2017
.
We continue to execute our tactical shift in strategy in our Government Solutions segment away from bidding on large commodity service contracts and toward pursuing contracts for our niche products with higher margins. We believe that we are starting to see the benefits of this overall shift in strategy as our book-to-bill ratio in this segment for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 increased to
1.39
from
0.53
in the preceding quarter. Bookings in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, for this segment, include the receipt of several important orders, including: (i) a
$23.8 million
order from an international space agency; (ii) initial funding of
$3.5 million
pursuant to a new
$42.7 million
five-year contract to provide the U.S. Army with continued Blue Force Tracking ("BFT-1") sustainment support; and (iii) an initial order pursuant to a new
$4.2 million
firm fixed priced, indefinite delivery / indefinite quantity ("IDIQ") contract to provide BFT-1 aviation transceivers to the Defense Logistics Agency.
In May 2017, our Commercial Solutions segment announced the general availability of its Heights
TM
Dynamic Network Access Technology ("HEIGHTS"). HEIGHTS is a potentially revolutionary technology designed to deliver the most Internet Protocol bits per Hertz (per satellite network operator) in its class, as well as robust reliability. HEIGHTS has and will continue to be a cornerstone of our future research and development efforts. In May 2017, we also announced that three separate customers have installed, accepted and are now using HEIGHTS to support their business needs. To date, customer reaction has been positive, as reflected in our receipt of orders in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, and we have a growing sales funnel of HEIGHTS opportunities that we expect to close. Given the complexity and sophistication of the HEIGHTS system and our experience since its launch, we anticipate that the initial sales cycle will be longer than our prior satellite earth station new product launches. As such, we now anticipate that fiscal
2018
will be the break-out year for orders and sales for our HEIGHTS products rather than the fourth quarter of fiscal
2017
.
Although we have just started our fiscal 2018 business planning process, we are seeing positive signs across almost all aspects of our business, including:
|
•
|
In addition to expected sales and operating income contributions from anticipated orders for our newly introduced HEIGHTS products, we are pursuing a number of large multi-million dollar and multi-year contract opportunities in both our Commercial Solutions and our Government Solutions segments, some of which are in the final stages of contract negotiations. Although the extent and timing of these contract awards is difficult to predict, we expect to receive some of these awards shortly. Because of uncertainty regarding contract award and order timing, it is difficult to predict our fourth quarter fiscal 2017 book-to-bill ratio. If some of these large contracts are awarded and orders are booked in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, consolidated fourth quarter bookings could be almost twice the level we achieved in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. At the same time, it is possible that the award of these potential large contracts and related orders may slip into fiscal 2018. In either event, these orders, if booked, are expected to benefit fiscal 2018 financial results.
|
37
|
•
|
We believe the receipt of the $42.7 million five-year contract to support the BFT-1 program and a related $4.2 million BFT-1 aviation transceiver order validates our historical strategy of working closely with the U.S. Army to meet its critical worldwide military communications system needs. We believe that the U.S. Army has a requirement for a next generation system (referred to commonly as BFT-3) and, based on our recent interactions with the U.S. Army, we are becoming increasingly confident that we will be able to participate in future BFT program awards.
|
|
•
|
In April 2017, the DoD publicly issued a large multi-million dollar and multi-year draft request for proposal for the supply of new troposcatter communications equipment to replace hundreds of the DoD’s AN/TRC-170 terminals. We have been a supplier of over-the-horizon microwave systems equipment (troposcatter systems) to the U.S. government for many years. We have a large installed base of over-the-horizon microwave systems, which include our patented forward error correction modem technology and which can transmit video and other broadband applications at throughputs over 50 megabits per second ("Mbps"). In addition to this large over-the-horizon microwave system opportunity, we are currently responding to a large multi-million dollar competitive solicitation from the U.S. Army to provide sustainment services to its AN/TSC-198 family of communication systems that are commonly referred to as Very Small Aperture Terminals or “VSATs.” We believe our field-proven technologies and support services are ideally suited to meet the DoD’s Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (also known as "C4ISR") needs and are actively pursuing these opportunities.
|
|
•
|
Our Safety and Security and Enterprise & Trusted Location Technologies are uniquely positioned. We continue to invest and upgrade our 911 capabilities and our location-based technologies as we believe the demand for our products will increase from current levels. Our Safety and Security solutions have been deployed around the United States and we believe we are finalists on a number of pending multi-year next-generation 911 potential awards, with at least one award announcement soon. Our location-based technologies are used by wireless carriers to provide Short-Messaging-Services ("SMS") to end-customers and are also used to communicate with 911 public safety service answering points.
|
|
•
|
Given our fiscal 2017 financial performance and our strong operating cash flows, we have successfully reduced the level of our total indebtedness since the beginning of our fiscal year. For the nine months ended April 30, 2017, we generated $43.7 million of cash flows from operating activities and reduced total indebtedness by $28.8 million. As of April 30, 2017, our cash and cash equivalents were $58.8 million and our total debt outstanding was $235.4 million (excluding deferred financing costs). Since the February 23, 2016 acquisition of TCS, we have reduced the debt incurred in connection with the acquisition by $125.9 million.
|
|
•
|
Given our expectation that our future business performance and operating cash flows will continue to be strong, in June 2017, we entered into a First Amendment (the “June 2017 Amendment”) of our Secured Credit Facility that is expected to result in increased operating and acquisition flexibility and simplify the calculations of our financial covenants. Given our expected future business performance, we anticipate maintaining compliance with the terms and covenants in our Secured Credit Facility, as amended, for the foreseeable future.
|
In view of the positive signs we are seeing and broad opportunities for future growth across all of our businesses, on
June 7, 2017
, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.10
per common share, payable on
August 18, 2017
to stockholders of record at the close of business on
July 17, 2017
. Future dividends remain subject to compliance with financial covenants under our Secured Credit Facility, as amended, as well as Board approval.
Our Business Outlook for Fiscal 2017 depends, in large part, on the receipt of orders from our customers. Our Business Outlook for Fiscal 2017 could be adversely impacted if business conditions deteriorate or our current or prospective customers materially postpone, reduce or even forgo purchases of our products and services.
In addition, because our historical results prior to February 23, 2016 do not include TCS, you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons as an indicator of future performance as these comparisons may not be meaningful.
Given the integration of TCS into our business and the joint marketing of our products, historical sales patterns and mix trends are becoming less relevant. As a result, period-to-period comparisons of sales, margins, operating income and Adjusted EBITDA contributions between TCS and Comtech legacy products will not be meaningful.
Additional information related to our Business Outlook for Fiscal
2017
is included in the below sections entitled
“Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended April 30, 2017 and April 30, 2016
” and “
Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended April 30, 2017 and April 30, 2016.
”
38
COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
THREE
MONTHS ENDED
APRIL 30, 2017
AND
APRIL 30, 2016
Net Sales.
Consolidated net sales were
$127.8
million and
$124.2
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, representing an
increase
of
$3.6
million, or
2.9%
. Net sales by operating segment are further discussed below.
Commercial Solutions
Net sales in our Commercial Solutions segment were
$79.4
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
, as compared to
$72.0
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
, an
increase
of
$7.4
million, or
10.3%
. The period-over-period increase in net sales is primarily attributable to an additional month of sales of enterprise technology solutions (such as our location and messaging based platforms) and safety and security technology solutions (such as wireless and next generation 911 ("NG911") platforms) that we now offer as a result of the February 23, 2016 TCS acquisition. The
third
quarter of fiscal 2016 only included approximately two months of such sales. In addition, the
third
quarter of fiscal 2017 benefited from increased sales of traveling wave tube amplifiers driven by strong demand from the in-flight connectivity market.
Our Commercial Solutions segment represented
62.1%
of consolidated net sales for the three months ended April 30, 2017 as compared to
58.0%
for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
. Our book-to-bill ratio (a measure defined as bookings divided by net sales) in this segment for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
was
0.86
.
Bookings for our communication technology solutions (which include our satellite earth station and traveling wave tube amplifier products) during the third quarter of fiscal 2017 were lower than both our second quarter of fiscal 2017 and third quarter of fiscal 2016. Although market conditions for our international satellite earth station customers appear to be improving and international sales of satellite earth station products during the three months ended April 30, 2017 were higher than the three months ended April 30, 2016, bookings and sales of satellite earth station products have been impacted by softness from our U.S. government customers. We attribute this softness to delays in awarding and/or funding certain programs and a continued lull in ordering as a result of political and budget uncertainty. Although we are not expecting a significant increase in short-term sales to the U.S. government for our satellite earth station products, we are expecting overall sales and bookings of communication technology solutions to increase from current levels, with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 being the peak quarter of bookings and sales for these products. In addition to expecting continued strength from our international satellite earth station customers, fourth quarter bookings are expected to benefit from the anticipated receipt of a large order for our traveling wave tube amplifiers that are used in the in-flight connectivity market. We anticipate that our fourth quarter will also benefit from an increase in orders for our HEIGHTS satellite earth station products. To date, customer reaction has been positive and we have a growing sales funnel of HEIGHTS opportunities. However, given the complexity and sophistication of the HEIGHTS system, the initial sales cycle is turning out to be longer than our prior satellite earth station new product launches and we anticipate that fiscal 2018 will be the break-out year for orders and sales for our HEIGHTS products.
Bookings for our safety and security technologies and enterprise technologies solutions during the third quarter of fiscal 2017 were lower than our second quarter primarily as a result of the timing of expected large awards. We are in late-stage contract negotiations for several large multi-year contracts for our safety and security and enterprise technology solutions and are also awaiting a decision by a state to announce a large NG911 award. If these large orders are booked during the fourth quarter, our book-to-bill ratio for fiscal 2017 for these products will exceed 1.0. We are confident that we will ultimately receive one or more of these large orders but it is possible that contract negotiations will continue into early fiscal 2018.
Looking forward to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, nets sales in our Commercial Solutions segment is expected to be the peak quarter of sales in fiscal 2017. Bookings, sales and profitability in our Commercial Solutions segment can fluctuate from period-to-period due to many factors, including changes in the general business environment. As such, period-to-period comparisons of our results may not be indicative of a trend or future performance.
Government Solutions
Net sales in our Government Solutions segment were
$48.4
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
as compared to
$52.2
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
, a
decrease
of
$3.8
million, or
7.3%
. The period-over-period decrease in net sales primarily reflects the implementation of our strategy of shifting our Government Solutions segment away from bidding on large commodity service contracts and toward pursuing contracts for our niche products with higher margins. This decline occurred despite the contribution of a full quarter of sales of new advanced communication solutions that we now offer as a result of the February 23, 2016 TCS acquisition. These new solutions include field support, space components and cyber-training. The
third
quarter of last year only included approximately two months of such sales. Although total sales of legacy Comtech products (which include over-the-horizon microwave system products, high-power broadband amplifiers and Blue Force Tracking ("BFT-1") sustainment support services) were higher, we experienced lower net sales of BFT-1 sustainment support services and intellectual property license fees due to the expiration of the related contracts on March 31, 2017.
39
Our Government Solutions segment represented
37.9%
of consolidated net sales for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
, as compared to
42.0%
for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
. Our book-to-bill ratio (a measure defined as bookings divided by net sales) in this segment for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
was
1.39
.
We continue to execute our tactical shift in strategy in our Government Solutions segment away from bidding on large commodity service contracts and toward pursuing contracts for our niche products with higher margins. The strong book-to-bill ratio we experienced this quarter reflects the receipt of several important orders, including: (i) a
$23.8 million
order from an international space agency; (ii) initial funding of
$3.5 million
pursuant to a new
$42.7 million
five-year contract to provide the U.S. Army with continued BFT-1 sustainment support; and (iii) an initial order pursuant to a new
$4.2 million
firm fixed price, IDIQ contract to provide BFT-1 aviation transceivers to the Defense Logistics Agency.
We are in various stages of proposals on several large multi-million dollar and multi-year contracts. These opportunities include potential awards for U.S. and international over-the-horizon microwave system orders and renewals of existing sustainment and retrofit services for a C4ISR solution commonly referred to as SNAP. Although the sales cycle for these contracts are long; some of these contracts are anticipated to be awarded soon, with the possibility of one international over-the-horizon microwave system opportunity being awarded as early as our
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
. Although these solicitations will be competitively awarded, we believe our field-proven experience will result in the receipt of one or more of these awards in future periods.
Looking forward to the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
, net sales in our Government Solutions segment is expected to be significantly higher than our most recent quarter. Bookings, sales and profitability in our Government Solutions segment can fluctuate dramatically from period-to-period due to many factors, including unpredictable funding, deployment and technology decisions by the U.S. government. As such, period-to-period comparisons of our results may not be indicative of a trend or future performance.
Geography and Customer Type
Sales by geography and customer type, as a percentage of related sales, for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
are as follows:
|
|
Three months ended April 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||
|
U.S. government
|
17.1
|
%
|
21.4
|
%
|
56.5
|
%
|
70.1
|
%
|
32.0
|
%
|
41.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Domestic
|
55.9
|
%
|
51.3
|
%
|
17.3
|
%
|
13.1
|
%
|
41.3
|
%
|
35.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total U.S.
|
73.0
|
%
|
72.7
|
%
|
73.8
|
%
|
83.2
|
%
|
73.3
|
%
|
77.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
International
|
27.0
|
%
|
27.3
|
%
|
26.2
|
%
|
16.8
|
%
|
26.7
|
%
|
22.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||||
Sales to U.S. government customers include sales to the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD"), intelligence and civilian agencies, as well as sales directly to or through prime contractors. Domestic sales include sales to U.S. state and local governments. International sales include sales to U.S. companies for inclusion in products that are sold to international customers.
As a result of the TCS acquisition, we believe that domestic net sales, as a percentage of our consolidated net sales, in future periods will be higher than it was in periods prior to the TCS acquisition, due to the inclusion in consolidated net sales of safety and security technology solutions (such as 911 call routing) which are primarily sold to U.S. customers.
Gross Profit.
Gross profit was
$52.5
million and
$51.4
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, representing an
increase
of
$1.1
million. This
increase
in gross profit dollars was driven by higher consolidated net sales as discussed above. Gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, was
41.1%
for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
and was similar to the percentage we achieved in the
three months ended April 30, 2016
. Our gross profit percentage reflects a higher concentration of Commercial Solution segment sales during the most recent quarter as compared to the prior year which was offset by a lower gross profit percentage in our Government Solutions segment. Gross profit, as a percentage of related segment net sales is further discussed below.
Our Commercial Solutions segment's gross profit, as a percentage of related segment net sales, for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
was slightly higher as compared to the
three months ended April 30, 2016
. Gross profit in this segment benefited from overall product mix changes and lower costs related to the procurement of certain traveling wave tube amplifier components.
40
Our Government Solutions segment's gross profit, as a percentage of related segment net sales, for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
was lower as compared to the
three months ended April 30, 2016
. This decrease was primarily due to lower sales volume and changes in overall product mix during our most recent quarter. Gross profit in this segment for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
includes
$1.7
million and
$2.5
million, respectively, related to a prior BFT-1 intellectual property license contract which expired on March 31,
2017
. Going forward, the U.S. Army does not have an obligation to pay us additional BFT-1 intellectual property license fees. As such, although sales in this segment are expected to increase in the
fourth
quarter, our gross profit percentage in this segment during the
fourth
quarter is expected to decline as compared to our most recent quarter. Over-time, we believe the implementation of our strategy of shifting our Government Solutions segment away from bidding on large commodity service contracts and toward pursuing contracts for our niche products, will result in higher gross margins.
Included in consolidated cost of sales for both the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
are provisions for excess and obsolete inventory of
$0.7 million
. As discussed in
“Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies - Provisions for Excess and Obsolete Inventory,”
we regularly review our inventory and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and projected usage assumptions.
Because our consolidated gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, depends on the volume of sales, sales mix and related gross profit for each individual segment, it is difficult to forecast. Nevertheless, based on expected bookings and expected timing of our performance on orders, we currently expect our consolidated gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, for the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
to be slightly lower than the percentage we achieved in the
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
. As a result of the full year impact of the TCS acquisition, anticipated mix changes and lower year-over-year BFT-1 intellectual property license fee revenues, we expect our fiscal
2017
gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, to be lower than the gross profit percentage we achieved in fiscal
2016
.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were
$25.9
million and
$30.4
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, representing a
decrease
of
$4.5
million, or 14.8%. As a percentage of consolidated net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were
20.3%
and
24.5%
for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively. The decrease in spending, both in dollars and as a percentage of consolidated net sales, is primarily attributable to a recovery of legal expenses from a
third
party during the most recent fiscal quarter and the benefit of cost reduction actions previously initiated. The decrease in percentage is also due to higher consolidated net sales during the
three months ended April 30, 2017
.
Amortization of stock-based compensation expense recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses was
$0.9 million
for both the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
.
Research and Development Expenses.
Research and development expenses were
$13.0
million and
$12.6
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, representing an
increase
of
$0.4
million, or
3.2%
. As a percentage of consolidated net sales, research and development expenses were
10.2%
and
10.1%
for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively.
For the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, research and development expenses of
$10.7
million and
$10.1
million, respectively, related to our Commercial Solutions segment and
$2.2
million and
$2.5
million, respectively, related to our Government Solutions segment. The remaining research and development expenses of
$0.1
million for both the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, related to the amortization of stock-based compensation expense, which is not allocated to our two reportable operating segments.
Whenever possible, we seek customer funding for research and development to adapt our products to specialized customer requirements. During the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, customers reimbursed us
$5.9
million and
$6.1
million, respectively, which is not reflected in the reported research and development expenses, but is included in net sales with the related costs included in cost of sales.
Amortization of Intangibles.
Amortization relating to intangible assets with finite lives was
$5.5
million (of which $
4.4 million
was for the Commercial Solutions segment and $
1.0 million
was for the Government Solutions segment) for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
and
$4.8
million (of which $
3.6 million
was for the Commercial Solutions segment and $
1.2 million
was for the Government Solutions segment) for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
. The increase in consolidated amortization of intangibles during the
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
is a result of an additional month of amortization expense related to the acquisition of TCS which closed on February 23, 2016, as compared to the prior year period which reflects approximately two months of amortization. We anticipate amortization expense for the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
to decrease slightly from our most recent fiscal quarter, as certain TCS intangible assets continue to become fully amortized.
41
Settlement of Intellectual Property Litigation.
As discussed further in
"Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (19) - Legal Proceedings and Other Matters"
during the
three months ended April 30, 2017
, we recorded a favorable adjustment to operating income of
$2.0 million
, net of estimated legal fees, to reflect a lower loss than originally estimated for a TCS intellectual property matter which was settled during the
three months ended April 30, 2017
. There was no comparable adjustment in the corresponding period of the prior year.
Acquisition Plan Expenses.
Acquisition plan expenses during the
three months ended April 30, 2016
include
$17.0
million of transaction costs primarily related to our acquisition of TCS on February 23, 2016, as discussed in "
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (2) - Acquisition.
"
There were
no
comparable expenses during the
three months ended April 30, 2017
.
Operating Income (Loss).
Operating income for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
was
$10.2
million as compared to a loss of
$13.4
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
. Operating income, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
was
8.0%
. Excluding the
$2.0 million
intellectual property litigation settlement adjustment, as discussed above, operating income for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
would have been
$8.2
million, or
6.4%
of consolidated net sales. Excluding the
$17.0
million of acquisition plan expenses as discussed above, operating income for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
would have been
$3.6
million, or
2.9%
of consolidated net sales. The increase to
$8.2
million from
$3.6
million was driven by increased operating income contributions from the Commercial Solutions segment and a positive contribution from unallocated expenses (as further discussed below) offset, in part, by a decline in operating income contribution from the Government Solutions segment. Changes in segment operating income (loss) contributions are shown in the table below:
|
|
Three months ended April 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Unallocated
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
6.6
|
|
1.3
|
|
5.6
|
|
0.2
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Percentage of related net sales
|
10.8
|
%
|
9.2
|
%
|
2.7
|
%
|
10.7
|
%
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
(10.8
|
)%
|
||||||||||
Operating income in our Commercial Solutions segment, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, benefited from higher sales and slightly higher gross margins, as discussed above. The
10.8%
operating income percentage for our
third
quarter of fiscal 2017 represents an increase from the
4.1%
and
7.2%
operating income percentages that we achieved in our
first
and
second
quarters of fiscal
2017
, respectively, and includes the benefit of various cost reduction actions that we previously took. Given the increase in this segment’s net sales expected to occur in the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
, we expect operating income, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, to significantly increase from the level and percentage we achieved in the
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
.
Operating income in our Government Solutions segment, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, was primarily driven by lower sales and lower gross margins, as discussed above. The
2.7%
operating income percentage for our
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
represents a decrease from the
4.2%
and
4.0%
operating income percentages that we achieved in our
first
and
second
quarters of fiscal
2017
, respectively. Despite the decrease in sales and gross margins, we continued our investments in research and development for projects that we believe will have future benefit. Given the increase in this segment’s net sales expected to occur in the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
, we expect operating income, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, to increase from the level and percentage we achieved in the
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
.
Unallocated operating income for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
was
$0.2
million and included the
$2.0 million
adjustment to operating income, as discussed above. For the
three months ended April 30, 2016
, unallocated operating expenses were
$25.6
million and included
$17.0
million of transaction costs primarily related to our acquisition of TCS on February 23, 2016, as discussed above. Excluding the
$2.0 million
adjustment and
$17.0
million of transaction costs, unallocated operating expenses for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
would have been
$1.8
million and
$8.6
million, respectively. The lower unallocated operating expenses during the
three months ended April 30, 2017
is primarily attributable to a recovery of legal expenses from a
third
party during the most recent fiscal quarter and the benefit of cost reduction actions previously initiated.
Amortization of stock-based compensation expense, which is included in unallocated operating expenses, was
$1.0 million
for both the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively. Total amortization of stock-based compensation expense in fiscal
2017
is expected to be higher than the amount we recorded in fiscal
2016
due to an increase in total awards to employees, which is largely attributable to our larger work force as a result of the TCS acquisition.
42
Our
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
consolidated operating income, in dollars and as a percentage of consolidated net sales, is expected to increase from our
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
.
Interest Expense and Other.
Interest expense was
$2.8
million and
$3.5
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively. Interest expense during the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
primarily reflects interest on our Secured Credit Facility. Based on the type, terms and amount of outstanding debt (including capital leases), we estimate that our effective interest rate (including amortization of deferred financing costs) will range from 4.5% to 5.0% in fiscal 2017. Our actual cash borrowing rate (which excludes the amortization of deferred financing costs) currently approximates 4.0%.
Interest Income and Other.
Interest income and other for both the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
was nominal. All of our available cash and cash equivalents are currently invested in bank deposits and money market deposit accounts which, at this time, are currently yielding a blended annual interest rate of approximately
0.57%
.
Provision for Income Taxes.
The provision for income taxes was
$2.9
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
, as compared to a tax benefit of
$2.5
million for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
. Our effective tax rate was
39.5%
for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
, as compared to
14.9%
for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
.
Excluding discrete tax items for the
three months ended April 30, 2017
, our effective tax rate would have been
36.0%
. Our effective tax rate excluding discrete tax items for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
was
19.25%
. The increase from
19.25%
to
36.0%
is principally attributable to the non-deductibility of certain transaction costs relating to the acquisition of TCS, which were incurred during the prior year comparable period.
During the
three months ended April 30, 2017
, we recorded a net discrete tax expense of
$0.3
million primarily related to the finalization of certain tax deductions in connection with the filing of our fiscal 2016 federal income tax return offset, in part, by the reversal of tax contingencies no longer required due to the expiration of applicable statutes of limitation. Our effective tax rate for the
three months ended April 30, 2016
reflects a discrete tax expense of
$0.7
million, primarily related to the establishment of tax contingencies for uncertain tax positions relating to the payment of certain expenses associated with the TCS acquisition offset, in part, by the reversal of tax contingencies no longer required due to the expiration of applicable statutes of limitation.
Our federal income tax returns for fiscal 2015 and 2016 are subject to potential future IRS audit. None of our state income tax returns prior to fiscal 2012 are subject to audit. TCS’s federal income tax returns for tax years 2013 through 2015 and the tax period from January 1, 2016 to February 23, 2016 are subject to potential future IRS audit. None of TCS’s state income tax returns prior to calendar year 2012 are subject to audit. Future tax assessments or settlements could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Net Income (Loss).
During the
three months ended April 30, 2017
, consolidated net income was
$4.4
million as compared to a consolidated net loss of
$14.4
million during the
three months ended April 30, 2016
.
Adjusted EBITDA.
Our Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, represents earnings before income taxes, interest (income) and other expense, interest expense, amortization of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangibles, depreciation expense, acquisition plan expenses and settlement of intellectual property litigation. These items, while periodically affecting our results, may vary significantly from period to period and may have a disproportionate effect in a given period, thereby affecting the comparability of results. Our Adjusted EBITDA is also used by our management in assessing the Company's operating results. Although closely aligned, the Company's definition of Adjusted EBITDA is different than the Consolidated EBITDA (as such term is defined in our Secured Credit Facility) utilized for financial covenant calculations and also may differ from the definition of EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA used by other companies (including TCS prior to our acquisition) and, therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Our Adjusted EBITDA is also a measure frequently requested by the Company's investors and analysts. The Company believes that investors and analysts may use our Adjusted EBITDA, along with other information contained in our SEC filings, in assessing our performance and comparability of our results with other companies.
43
Adjusted EBITDA (both in dollars and as a percentage of related net sales) for both the
three months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
are shown in the table below (numbers in the table may not foot due to rounding):
|
|
Three months ended April 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Unallocated
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
6.4
|
|
1.3
|
|
5.6
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
(26.4
|
)
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
(14.4
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Provision for (benefit) from income taxes
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2.9
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
2.9
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Interest (income) and other expenses
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
—
|
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2.7
|
|
3.4
|
|
2.8
|
|
3.5
|
|
||||||||||
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1.0
|
|
1.0
|
|
1.0
|
|
1.0
|
|
||||||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
4.4
|
|
3.6
|
|
1.0
|
|
1.2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5.5
|
|
4.8
|
|
||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
2.4
|
|
2.1
|
|
0.8
|
|
0.6
|
|
0.4
|
|
0.3
|
|
3.5
|
|
3.1
|
|
||||||||||
|
Acquisition plan expenses
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
17.0
|
|
—
|
|
17.0
|
|
||||||||||
|
Settlement of intellectual property litigation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
12.3
|
|
3.1
|
|
7.4
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
(7.3
|
)
|
$
|
18.1
|
|
12.5
|
|
||||||||
|
Percentage of related net sales
|
19.5
|
%
|
17.1
|
%
|
6.4
|
%
|
14.2
|
%
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
10.0
|
%
|
||||||||||
The increase in consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, in dollars and as a percentage of consolidated net sales, during the
three months ended April 30, 2017
as compared to the
three months ended April 30, 2016
, is primarily attributable to an increase in consolidated net sales and lower operating expenses, as discussed above. The increase in our Commercial Solutions segment's Adjusted EBITDA, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, was primarily attributable to an increase in this segment's net sales and slightly higher gross margins, as discussed above. The decrease in our Government Solutions segment's Adjusted EBITDA, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, was primarily driven by lower sales and lower gross margins, as discussed above.
We believe that consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (in dollars) for our
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
will be the highest of any quarter in fiscal
2017
. We expect Adjusted EBITDA to approximate
12.0%
of our consolidated net sales for fiscal
2017
.
44
COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NINE
MONTHS ENDED
APRIL 30, 2017
AND
APRIL 30, 2016
Net Sales.
Consolidated net sales were
$402.6
million and
$258.6
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, representing an
increase
of
$144.0
million, or
55.7%
. The period-over-period increase in net sales was driven by incremental sales of
$154.6 million
as a result of the TCS acquisition on February 23, 2016. Net sales by operating segment are further discussed below.
Commercial Solutions
Net sales in our Commercial Solutions segment were approximately
$237.7
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, as compared to
$165.7
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
, an
increase
of
$72.0
million, or
43.5%
. The period-over-period
increase
in net sales reflects incremental sales of
$83.2 million
from legacy TCS product lines, partially offset by lower sales of Comtech legacy products. The incremental TCS sales include approximately seven additional months of sales of enterprise technology solutions (such as our location and messaging based platforms) and safety and security technology solutions (such as wireless and next generation 911 ("NG911") platforms) that we now offer as a result of the February 23, 2016 TCS acquisition. Net sales for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
only included approximately two months of such sales. Sales of Comtech legacy products declined due to lower sales of our satellite earth station products partially offset by a slight increase in sales of traveling wave tube amplifiers.
Our Commercial Solutions segment represented
59.0%
of consolidated net sales for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
as compared to
64.1%
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. Our book-to-bill ratio (a measure defined as bookings divided by net sales) in this segment for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
was
0.97
as compared to
0.91
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
.
Overall bookings for our Commercial solutions segment during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
were significantly higher than the prior year comparable period because they include approximately seven additional months of orders of enterprise technology solutions (such as our location and messaging based platforms) and safety and security solutions (such as wireless and NG911 platforms) that we now offer as a result of the February 23, 2016 TCS acquisition. Bookings for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
only included approximately two months of such bookings. Orders for Comtech legacy products were lower during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
due to lower bookings for our satellite earth station products.
Although market conditions for our international satellite earth station customers appear to be improving and international sales of satellite earth station products during the third quarter of fiscal 2017 were higher than the third quarter of fiscal 2016, bookings and sales of satellite earth station products have been impacted by softness from our U.S. government customers. We attribute this softness to delays in awarding and/or funding certain programs and a continued lull in ordering as a result of political and budget uncertainty. Although we are not expecting a significant increase in short-term sales to the U.S. government for our satellite earth station products, we are expecting overall sales and bookings of communication technology solutions to increase from current levels, with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 being the peak quarter of bookings and sales for these products. In addition to expecting continued strength from our international satellite earth station customers, fourth quarter bookings are expected to benefit from the anticipated receipt of a large order for our traveling wave tube amplifiers that are used in the in-flight connectivity market. We anticipate that our fourth quarter will also benefit from an increase in orders for our HEIGHTS satellite earth station products. To date, customer reaction has been positive and we have a growing sales funnel of HEIGHTS opportunities. However, given the complexity and sophistication of the HEIGHTS system, the initial sales cycle is turning out to be longer than our prior satellite earth station new product launches and we anticipate that fiscal 2018 will be the break-out year for orders and sales for our HEIGHTS products.
Bookings for our safety and security technologies and enterprise technologies solutions during the
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
were lower than our second quarter primarily as a result of timing of expected large awards. We are in late-stage contract negotiations for several large multi-year contracts for our safety and security and enterprise technology solutions and we are also awaiting a decision by a domestic state to announce a large NG911 award. If these large orders are booked during the
fourth
quarter, our book-to-bill ratio for fiscal
2017
for these products will exceed 1.0. We are confident that we will ultimately receive one or more of these large orders, but it is possible that contract negotiation will continue into early fiscal 2018.
Looking forward to the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
, net sales in our Commercial Solutions segment is expected to be the peak quarter of sales in fiscal
2017
. Bookings, sales and profitability in our Commercial Solutions segment can fluctuate from period-to-period due to many factors, including changes in the general business environment. As such, period-to-period comparisons of our results may not be indicative of a trend or future performance.
45
Government Solutions
Net sales in our Government Solutions segment were
$164.9
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
as compared to
$93.0
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
, an increase of
$71.9
million, or
77.3%
. The period-over-period increase in net sales primarily reflects incremental sales of
$71.5 million
from legacy TCS product lines. The incremental sales include approximately seven additional months of new advanced communication solutions that we now offer as a result of the February 23, 2016 TCS acquisition. These new solutions include field support, space components and cyber-training. The nine month period of last year only included approximately two months of such sales. Sales of legacy Comtech products (which include over-the-horizon microwave system products, high-power broadband amplifiers and BFT-1 sustainment support services) were also slightly higher. Net sales for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
include
$6.7
million and
$7.5
million, respectively, of sales related to a prior BFT-1 intellectual property license contract, which expired on March 31,
2017
. Going forward, the U.S. Army does not have an obligation to pay us additional BFT-1 intellectual property license fees.
Our Government Solutions segment represented
41.0%
of consolidated net sales for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, as compared to
35.9%
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. Our book-to-bill ratio (a measure defined as bookings divided by net sales) in this segment for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
was
0.90
.
We continue to execute our tactical shift in strategy in our Government Solutions segment away from bidding on large commodity service contracts and toward pursuing contracts for our niche products with higher margins. The strong book-to-bill ratio we experienced this quarter reflects the receipt of several important orders including: (i) a
$23.8 million
order from an international space agency; (ii) initial funding of
$3.5 million
pursuant to a new
$42.7 million
five-year contract to provide the U.S. Army with continued BFT-1 sustainment support; and (iii) an initial order pursuant to a new
$4.2 million
firm fixed price, IDIQ contract to provide BFT-1 aviation transceivers to the Defense Logistics Agency.
We are in various stages of proposals on several large multi-million dollar and multi-year contracts. These opportunities include potential awards for the U.S. and international over-the-horizon microwave system orders and renewals of existing sustainment and retrofit services for C4ISR solution commonly referred to as SNAP. Although the sales cycle for these contracts are long; however, some of these contracts are expected to be awarded soon, with the possibility of one international over-the-horizon microwave system opportunity being awarded as early as our
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
. Although these solicitations will be competitively awarded, we believe our field-proven experience will result in the receipt of one or more of these awards in future periods.
Looking forward to the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
, net sales in our Government Solutions segment is expected to be significantly higher than our most recent quarter. Bookings, sales and profitability in our Government Solutions segment can fluctuate dramatically from period-to-period due to many factors, including unpredictable funding, deployment and technology decisions by the U.S. government. As such, period-to-period comparisons of our results may not be indicative of a trend or future performance.
Geography and Customer Type
Sales by geography and customer type, as a percentage of related sales, for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
are as follows:
|
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||
|
U.S. government
|
14.0
|
%
|
27.8
|
%
|
60.7
|
%
|
66.6
|
%
|
33.1
|
%
|
41.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
Domestic
|
54.4
|
%
|
33.4
|
%
|
14.1
|
%
|
12.8
|
%
|
37.9
|
%
|
26.0
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total U.S.
|
68.4
|
%
|
61.2
|
%
|
74.8
|
%
|
79.4
|
%
|
71.0
|
%
|
67.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
International
|
31.6
|
%
|
38.8
|
%
|
25.2
|
%
|
20.6
|
%
|
29.0
|
%
|
32.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||||
Sales to U.S. government customers include sales to the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD"), intelligence and civilian agencies, as well as sales directly to or through prime contractors. Domestic sales include sales to U.S. state and local governments. International sales include sales to U.S. companies for inclusion in products that are sold to international customers.
46
As a result of the TCS acquisition, we believe that domestic net sales, as a percentage of our consolidated net sales, in future periods will be higher than it was in periods prior to the TCS acquisition, due to the inclusion in consolidated net sales of safety and security technology solutions (such as 911 call routing) which are primarily sold to U.S. customers.
Gross Profit.
Gross profit was
$157.8
million and
$109.0
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, representing an
increase
of
$48.8
million. This increase in gross profit dollars was driven by higher consolidated net sales as discussed above. Gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, decreased from
42.2%
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
to
39.2%
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
. This decrease is attributable to overall product mix changes resulting primarily from the TCS acquisition, in particular, the inclusion of net sales related to TCS government solutions, which have historically had lower gross margins than Comtech’s legacy products. Gross profit, as a percentage of related segment net sales is further discussed below.
Our Commercial Solutions segment's gross profit, as a percentage of related segment net sales, for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
was higher as compared to the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. This increase was primarily driven by the inclusion of net sales related to TCS commercial solutions during our most recent nine month period, which had higher gross margins than Comtech's legacy products, as well as improved gross profit percentages related to Comtech's legacy products (which benefited, in part, from lower costs related to the procurement of certain traveling wave tube amplifier components).
Our Government Solutions segment's gross profit, as a percentage of related segment net sales, for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
was significantly lower as compared to the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. This decrease was primarily driven by the inclusion of net sales of TCS government solutions for the full
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, which had significantly lower gross margins than Comtech's legacy products. Gross profit in this segment, for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
includes
$6.7
million and
$7.5
million, respectively, related to a prior BFT-1intellectual property license contract, which expired on March 31,
2017
. Going forward, the U.S. Army does not have an obligation to pay us additional BFT-1 intellectual property license fees. As such, although sales in this segment are expected to increase in the
fourth
quarter as compared to our most recent quarter, our gross profit percentage in this segment during the
fourth
quarter is expected to decline as compared to our most recent quarter. Over-time, we believe the implementation of our strategy of shifting our Government Solutions segment away from bidding on large commodity service contracts and toward pursuing contracts for our niche products, will result in higher gross margins.
Included in consolidated cost of sales for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
are provisions for excess and obsolete inventory of
$1.8 million
and
$2.0 million
, respectively. As discussed in
“Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies - Provisions for Excess and Obsolete Inventory,”
we regularly review our inventory and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and projected usage assumptions.
Because our consolidated gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, depends on the volume of sales, sales mix and related gross profit for each individual segment, it is difficult to forecast. Nevertheless, based on expected bookings and expected timing of our performance on orders, we currently expect our consolidated gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, for the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
to be slightly lower than the percentage we achieved in the
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
. As a result of the full year impact of the TCS acquisition, anticipated mix changes and lower year-over-year BFT-1 intellectual property license fee revenues, we expect our fiscal
2017
gross profit, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, to be lower than the gross profit percentage we achieved in fiscal
2016
.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were
$89.6
million and
$60.8
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, representing an
increase
of
$28.8
million. The increase in spending is primarily attributable to incremental expenses associated with the increased size of our business as a result of the TCS acquisition. As a percentage of consolidated net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were
22.3%
and
23.5%
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively. This decrease in percentage is primarily due to higher consolidated net sales during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
and the benefit of cost reduction actions previously initiated.
Amortization of stock-based compensation expense recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses was
$2.6 million
for both the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively.
47
Research and Development Expenses.
Research and development expenses were
$40.4
million and
$28.2
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, representing an
increase
of
$12.2
million, or
43.3%
. The
increase
in spending is primarily attributable to incremental expenses associated with the TCS product lines. As a percentage of consolidated net sales, research and development expenses were
10.0%
and
10.9%
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively.
For the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, research and development expenses of
$33.4
million and
$22.5
million, respectively, related to our Commercial Solutions segment and
$6.8
million and
$5.4
million, respectively, related to our Government Solutions segment. The remaining research and development expenses of
$0.2
million and $
0.3
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively, related to the amortization of stock-based compensation expense, which is not allocated to our two reportable operating segments.
Whenever possible, we seek customer funding for research and development to adapt our products to specialized customer requirements. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, customers reimbursed us
$21.9
million and
$10.9
million, respectively, which is not reflected in the reported research and development expenses, but is included in net sales with the related costs included in cost of sales.
Amortization of Intangibles.
Amortization relating to intangible assets with finite lives was
$17.6
million (of which
$13.3
million was for the Commercial Solutions segment and
$4.3
million was for the Government Solutions segment) for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
and
$7.3
million (of which
$6.2
million was for the Commercial Solutions segment and
$1.2
million was for the Government Solutions segment) for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. The significant increase in amortization of intangibles is a result of our acquisition of TCS on February 23, 2016. We anticipate amortization expense for the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
to decrease slightly from our most recent fiscal quarter, as intangibles continue to become fully amortized.
Settlement of Intellectual Property Litigation.
As discussed further in
"Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (19) - Legal Proceedings and Other Matters"
during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we recorded favorable adjustments to operating income of
$12.0 million
, net of estimated legal fees, to reflect lower losses than originally estimated for TCS intellectual property matters which were settled during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
. There were no comparable adjustments in the corresponding period of the prior year.
Acquisition Plan Expenses.
Acquisition plan expenses during the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
include
$20.7
million of transaction costs primarily related to our acquisition of TCS on February 23, 2016, as discussed further in "
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (2) - Acquisition.
"
There were
no
comparable expenses during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
.
Operating Income (Loss).
Operating income for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
was
$22.3
million as compared to a loss of
$8.0
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. Operating income, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
was
5.5%
. Excluding the
$12.0 million
intellectual property litigation settlement adjustment, as discussed above, operating income for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
would have been
$10.3
million, or
2.6%
of consolidated net sales. Excluding
$20.7
million of acquisition plan expenses, as discussed above, operating income for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
would have been
$12.7
million, or
4.9%
of consolidated net sales. The decrease to
$10.3
million from
$12.7
million was driven by significantly lower operating income contributions from the Government Solutions segment that was offset in part by increased operating income contribution from the Commercial Solutions segment and lower unallocated expenses (as further discussed below). Changes in segment operating income (loss) contributions were directly impacted by the TCS acquisition and are shown in the table below:
|
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Unallocated
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
14.0
|
|
6.2
|
|
15.4
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
(37.5
|
)
|
$
|
22.3
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Percentage of related net sales
|
7.4
|
%
|
8.4
|
%
|
3.8
|
%
|
16.6
|
%
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
||||||||||
48
The increase in our Commercial Solutions segment’s operating income, in dollars, is primarily due to an increase in this segment's net sales during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, substantially offset by incremental amortization of intangibles associated with the TCS acquisition. The decrease in operating income, as a percentage of related segment net sales, is primarily due to the incremental amortization of intangibles associated with the TCS acquisition. Although our operating income percentage for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
was
7.4%
, during our most recent quarter we generated a
10.8%
operating income percentage which represents an increase from the
4.1%
and
7.2%
operating income percentages that we achieved in our first and second quarters of fiscal
2017
. These period-to-period increases in fiscal
2017
primarily represent the benefits of cost reduction actions that we took in earlier periods and changes in product sales and other changes discussed above. Given the increase in this segment’s net sales that are expected to occur in the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
, we expect operating income, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, to significantly increase from the level and percentage we achieved in the
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
.
The decrease in our Government Solutions segment’s operating income, in dollars, was primarily driven by lower operating income contribution from TCS's government solutions sales, which includes the impact of incremental amortization of intangibles associated with the TCS acquisition, and lower operating income contributions from Comtech’s legacy products. The decline in operating income, as a percentage of the related segment net sales from
16.6%
to
3.8%
was primarily due to the inclusion of TCS government solutions net sales and operating results for the full
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, which reflects significantly lower gross margins than Comtech’s legacy government solutions net sales as well as incremental amortization of intangibles associated with the TCS acquisition. Given the increase in this segment’s net sales expected to occur in the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
, we expect operating income, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, to increase from the level and percentage we achieved in the nine months of fiscal
2017
.
Unallocated operating expenses for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
were
$1.5
million and included the
$12.0 million
adjustment to operating income, as discussed above. For the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
, unallocated operating expenses were
$37.5
million and included
$20.7
million of transaction costs primarily related to our acquisition of TCS on February 23, 2016, as discussed above. Excluding the
$12.0 million
adjustment and the
$20.7
million of transaction costs, unallocated operating expenses for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
would have been
$13.5
million and
$16.8
million, respectively. The lower unallocated operating expenses during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
primarily reflects lower legal expenses (including a recovery of legal expenses from a
third
party during the most recent fiscal quarter) and the benefit of cost reduction actions previously initiated.
Amortization of stock-based compensation expense, which is included in unallocated operating expenses, was
$3.0 million
and
$3.2 million
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively. Total amortization of stock-based compensation expense in fiscal
2017
is expected to be higher than the amount we recorded in fiscal
2016
due to an increase in total awards to employees which is largely attributable to our larger work force as a result of the TCS acquisition.
Our
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
consolidated operating income, in dollars and as a percentage of consolidated net sales, is expected to increase from our
third
quarter of fiscal
2017
.
Interest Expense and Other.
Interest expense was
$8.9
million and
$3.6
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, respectively. Interest expense for both periods primarily reflects interest on our Secured Credit Facility. Based on the type, terms and amount of outstanding debt (including capital leases), we estimate that our effective interest rate (including amortization of deferred financing costs) will range from 4.5% to 5.0% in fiscal 2017. Our actual cash borrowing rate (which excludes the amortization of deferred financing costs) currently approximates 4.0%.
Interest Income and Other.
Interest income and other for both the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
was nominal. All of our available cash and cash equivalents are currently invested in bank deposits and money market deposit accounts which, at this time, are currently yielding a blended annual interest rate of approximately
0.57%
.
Provision for Income Taxes.
The provision for income taxes was
$4.8
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, as compared to a tax benefit of
$1.0
million for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. Our effective tax rate was
36.1%
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, as compared to
8.7%
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
.
Excluding discrete tax items for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, our effective tax rate would have been
36.0%
. Our effective tax rate excluding discrete tax items for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
was
19.25%
. The increase from
19.25%
to
36.0%
is principally attributable to the non-deductibility of certain transaction costs relating to the acquisition of TCS, which were incurred during the prior year comparable period.
49
During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we recorded a net discrete tax expense of less than
$0.1
million. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
, we recorded a discrete tax expense of
$1.2
million, primarily related to the establishment of tax contingencies for uncertain tax positions relating to the payment of certain expenses associated with the TCS acquisition, offset, in part, by the reversal of tax contingencies no longer required due to the expiration of applicable statutes of limitation.
During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we reached an effective settlement with the IRS relating to its audit of our federal income tax return for fiscal 2014. This effective settlement did not have a material impact on our results of operations. Our federal income tax returns for fiscal 2015 and 2016 are subject to potential future IRS audit. None of our state income tax returns prior to fiscal 2012 are subject to audit. TCS’s federal income tax returns for tax years 2013 through 2015 and the tax period from January 1, 2016 to February 23, 2016 are subject to potential future IRS audit. None of TCS’s state income tax returns prior to calendar year 2012 are subject to audit. Future tax assessments or settlements could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Net Income (Loss).
During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, consolidated net income was
$8.5
million as compared to a consolidated net loss of
$10.4
million during the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
.
Adjusted EBITDA.
Our Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, represents earnings before income taxes, interest (income) and other expense, interest expense, amortization of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangibles, depreciation expense, acquisition plan expenses and settlement of intellectual property litigation. These items, while periodically affecting our results, may vary significantly from period to period and may have a disproportionate effect in a given period, thereby affecting the comparability of results. Our Adjusted EBITDA is also used by our management in assessing the Company's operating results. Although closely aligned, the Company's definition of Adjusted EBITDA is different than the Consolidated EBITDA (as such term is defined in our Secured Credit Facility) utilized for financial covenant calculations and also may differ from the definition of EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA used by other companies (including TCS prior to our acquisition) and, therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Our Adjusted EBITDA is also a measure frequently requested by the Company's investors and analysts. The Company believes that investors and analysts may use our Adjusted EBITDA, along with other information contained in our SEC filings, in assessing our performance and comparability of our results with other companies.
Adjusted EBITDA (both in dollars and as a percentage of related net sales) for both the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
are shown in the table below (numbers in the table may not foot due to rounding):
|
|
Nine months ended April 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
($ in millions)
|
Commercial Solutions
|
Government Solutions
|
Unallocated
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
13.6
|
|
6.2
|
|
15.4
|
|
(14.9
|
)
|
(39.5
|
)
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Provision for (benefit) from income taxes
|
0.2
|
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4.6
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
4.8
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Interest (income) and other expenses
|
—
|
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
—
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
0.2
|
|
0.2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8.8
|
|
3.4
|
|
8.9
|
|
3.6
|
|
||||||||||
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3.0
|
|
3.2
|
|
3.0
|
|
3.2
|
|
||||||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
13.3
|
|
6.2
|
|
4.3
|
|
1.2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
17.6
|
|
7.3
|
|
||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
7.4
|
|
4.6
|
|
2.3
|
|
1.2
|
|
1.2
|
|
0.3
|
|
10.8
|
|
6.1
|
|
||||||||||
|
Acquisition plan expenses
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20.7
|
|
—
|
|
20.7
|
|
||||||||||
|
Settlement of intellectual property litigation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
38.3
|
|
24.8
|
|
12.7
|
|
17.7
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
(13.3
|
)
|
$
|
41.6
|
|
29.2
|
|
||||||||
|
Percentage of related net sales
|
16.1
|
%
|
15.0
|
%
|
7.7
|
%
|
19.1
|
%
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
11.3
|
%
|
||||||||||
50
The increase in consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, in dollars, during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
as compared to the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
is primarily attributable to earnings contributions associated with the TCS acquisition, period-to-period changes in sales mix and gross margin contributions and lower unallocated expenses during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, all of which is discussed above. The decrease in consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
as compared to the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
is primarily attributable to overall product mix changes resulting primarily from the TCS acquisition, in particular, the inclusion of net sales related to TCS government solutions, which have historically had lower gross margins than Comtech’s legacy products. The increase in our Commercial Solutions segment's Adjusted EBITDA, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, was primarily attributable to an increase in this segment's net sales and slightly higher gross margins, as discussed above. The decrease in our Government Solutions segment's Adjusted EBITDA, in dollars and as a percentage of related segment net sales, was primarily driven by the inclusion of net sales related to TCS government solutions, which have historically had lower gross margins than Comtech’s legacy products, as discussed above.
We believe that consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (in dollars) for our
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2017
will be the highest of any quarter in fiscal
2017
. We expect Adjusted EBITDA to approximate
12.0%
of our consolidated net sales for fiscal
2017
.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our cash and cash equivalents decreased to
$58.8 million
at
April 30, 2017
from
$66.8 million
at
July 31, 2016
, a decrease of
$8.0 million
. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
was driven by the following:
|
•
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $
43.7 million
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
as compared to $
12.3 million
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. The period-over-period increase in cash flow from operating activities is attributable to overall changes in net working capital requirements, the timing of billings and payments and the inclusion of the TCS business.
|
|
•
|
Net cash used in investing activities for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
was $
6.2 million
as compared to $
283.6 million
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. The period-over-period decrease in net cash used in investing activities is primarily due to the payment of
$280.5 million
related to the acquisition of TCS in February 2016, net of cash acquired.
|
|
•
|
Net cash used in financing activities was $
45.4 million
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
as compared to net cash provided of
$189.5 million
for the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we made
$18.3 million
of net payments under our Revolving Loan Facility and made
$10.5 million
of principal repayments related to our Term Loan Facility and capital lease obligations. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
, $351.9 million of proceeds were received from the borrowings under our Secured Credit Facility which was partially offset by a payment of
$134.1 million
for debt assumed in connection with the acquisition of TCS. This TCS debt was paid on the closing date of the acquisition or, in the case of TCS's 7.75% convertible senior notes, shortly after we closed the acquisition. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2016
, we also paid
$10.1 million
of debt issuance costs associated with the Secured Credit Facility and made our first mandatory principal payment. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
, we paid
$16.5 million
and
$14.5 million
, respectively, in cash dividends to our shareholders.
|
Our investment policy relating to our cash and cash equivalents is intended to minimize principal loss while at the same time maximize the income we receive without significantly increasing risk. To minimize risk, we generally invest our cash and cash equivalents in money market mutual funds (both government and commercial), certificates of deposit, bank deposits, and U.S. Treasury securities. Many of our money market mutual funds invest in direct obligations of the U.S. government, bank securities guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, certificates of deposit and commercial paper and other securities issued by other companies. While we cannot predict future market conditions or market liquidity, we believe our investment policies are appropriate in the current environment. Ultimately, the availability of our cash and cash equivalents is dependent on a well-functioning liquid market.
We acquired TCS on February 23, 2016 and entered into a five-year Secured Credit Facility, as amended, which is described below, in further detail, in the section entitled
“Liquidity and Capital Resources - Financing Arrangements - Secured Credit Facility.”
The Secured Credit Facility, as amended, is also discussed in
“Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (10) - Secured Credit Facility.”
51
As of
April 30, 2017
, our material short-term cash requirements primarily consist of: (i) quarterly interest payments and principal repayments associated with the Secured Credit Facility, as amended, (ii) capital lease obligations and operating lease commitments, (iii) our ongoing working capital needs, including income tax payments and (iv) accrued quarterly dividends.
In June 2016, we sold 7.1 million shares of our common stock in a public offering at a price of $14.00 per share, resulting in proceeds to us of $95.0 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions. As of
April 30, 2017
and
June 7, 2017
, an aggregate registered amount of $75.0 million under our existing Shelf Registration Statement filed with the SEC remains available for sale of various types of securities, including debt.
As of
April 30, 2017
and
June 7, 2017
, we were authorized to repurchase up to an additional
$8.7 million
of our common stock, pursuant to our current
$100.0 million
stock repurchase program. Our stock repurchase program has no time restrictions and repurchases may be made in open-market or privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. There were
no
repurchases of our common stock during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016
.
On
October 6, 2016
, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.30
per common share, which was paid on
November 22, 2016
. On both
December 7, 2016
and March 8, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.10
per common share, which were paid on
February 17, 2017
and May 18, 2017, respectively. On
June 7, 2017
, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.10
per common share, payable on
August 18, 2017
to stockholders of record at the close of business on
July 17, 2017
. Future dividends remain subject to compliance with financial covenants under our Secured Credit Facility as well as Board approval.
Our material long-term cash requirements primarily consist of mandatory interest payments and principal repayments pursuant to our Secured Credit Facility, as amended, and payments relating to our capital lease obligations and operating lease commitments. In addition, we expect to make future cash payments of approximately
$2.6 million
related to our 2009 Radyne-related restructuring plan, including accreted interest. For further information regarding our Radyne restructuring plan, see
“Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note (9) - Radyne Acquisition-Related Restructuring Plan.”
We continue to receive (and approve on a limited basis) requests from our customers for higher credit limits and longer payment terms. We also continue to monitor our accounts receivable credit portfolio and, except for two recent international customers, have not had any material negative customer credit experiences historically.
We have historically met both our short-term and long-term cash requirements with funds provided by a combination of cash and cash equivalent balances, cash generated from operating activities and cash generated from financing transactions. Based on our anticipated level of future sales and operating income, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalent balances, our cash generated from operating activities and amounts potentially available under the Revolving Loan Facility under our Secured Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet both our currently anticipated short-term and long-term operating cash requirements.
As discussed further in
"Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (10) - Secured Credit Facility"
, on June 6, 2017, we entered into a First Amendment of the Secured Credit Facility (the “June 2017 Amendment”) that is expected to result in increased operating and acquisition flexibility and simplify the calculations of our financial covenants. The June 2017 Amendment resulted in, among other things, that the:
|
(i)
|
Consolidated EBITDA definition will now more closely align with our Adjusted EBITDA metric by eliminating favorable adjustments to operating income related to settlements of TCS intellectual property matters;
|
|
(ii)
|
Leverage Ratio will now be calculated on a “gross” basis using the quotient of Total Indebtedness (excluding unamortized deferred financing costs) divided by our trailing twelve months ("TTM") Consolidated EBITDA. The prior Leverage Ratio was calculated on a “net” basis but did not include a reduction for any cash or cash equivalents above
$50.0 million
;
|
|
(iii)
|
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio will now include a deduction for all cash dividends, regardless of the amount of our cash and cash equivalents and the related allowable Quarterly Dividend Amount, as defined, will now align with our current quarterly dividend target of
$0.10
per common share;
|
|
(iv)
|
Balloon or final payment of the Term Loan Facility, which is not due until February 23, 2021, was reduced by
$22.5 million
through increased borrowings from the Revolving Loan Facility, which does not expire until February 23, 2021; and
|
|
(v)
|
Leverage Ratios will be adjusted, in certain conditions, to provide for additional flexibility for us to make acquisitions.
|
52
In connection with the June 2017 Amendment, there were no changes to: (i) the committed borrowing capacity; (ii) the maturity date; or (iii) interest rates payable (except that the interest rate pricing grid will now be based on the new Leverage Ratio). Also, the June 2017 Amendment did not result in an extinguishment for accounting purposes (as such term is defined in ASC 470 - “
Debt
”). As a result, deferred financing costs (including incremental fees for the June 2017 Amendment) will continue to be amortized over the remaining maturity term of the Secured Credit Facility.
The terms and financial covenants of the June 2017 Amendment are retroactive to
April 30, 2017
. Based on the simplified financial covenant calculations described above, our Leverage Ratio was
3.89
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA (as compared to a maximum allowable of
4.25
x) and our Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio was
1.70
x (as compared to a minimum requirement of
1.25
x). Assuming we had reduced the borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan Facility at April 30, 2017 by
$22.5 million
using our cash and cash equivalents, our Leverage Ratio, on a pro-forma basis, would have been
3.52
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA for the measurement period ended on
April 30, 2017
. Based on the aforementioned, we were in full compliance with the retroactive terms and financial covenants in our Secured Credit Facility, as amended.
For our fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the maximum allowable Leverage Ratio will decrease to
3.75
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA. In fiscal 2018, such ratio will decrease further each quarter until reaching
3.00
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, with no further reductions thereafter. The minimum required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of
1.25
x will not change for the remaining term of the Secured Credit Facility. Given our expected future business performance, we anticipate maintaining compliance with the terms and financial covenants in our Secured Credit Facility, as amended, for the foreseeable future.
The obligations under the Secured Credit Facility, as amended, are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). As collateral security for amounts outstanding under our Secured Credit Facility, as amended, and the guarantees thereof, we and our Subsidiary Guarantors have granted to an administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, a lien on, and first priority security interest in, substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets.
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth for such terms in the Secured Credit Facility, dated as of February 23, 2016, and the First Amendment of the Secured Credit Facility, dated as of June 6, 2017, both of which have been documented and filed with the SEC.
Although it is difficult in the current economic and credit environment to predict the terms and conditions of financing that may be available in the future, should our short-term or long-term cash requirements increase beyond our current expectations, we believe that we would have sufficient access to credit from financial institutions and/or financing from public and private debt and equity markets.
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Secured Credit Facility
On
February 23, 2016
, in connection with our acquisition of TCS, we entered into a
$400.0 million
secured credit facility (the "Secured Credit Facility") with a syndicate of lenders. The Secured Credit Facility comprises a senior secured term loan A facility of
$250.0 million
(the “Term Loan Facility”) and a secured revolving loan facility of up to
$150.0 million
, including a
$25.0 million
letter of credit sublimit (the “Revolving Loan Facility” and, together, with the Term Loan Facility, the “Secured Credit Facilities”), each of which mature on February 23, 2021. The proceeds of these borrowings were primarily used to finance our acquisition of TCS, including the repayment of certain existing indebtedness of TCS. The Term Loan Facility requires mandatory quarterly repayments. During the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we repaid
$7.7 million
principal amount of borrowings under the Term Loan Facility. Under the Revolving Loan Facility, we had outstanding balances ranging from
$41.9 million
to
$84.9 million
during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
. As of
April 30, 2017
, the outstanding balances under the Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Loan Facility were
$164.9 million
and
$65.6 million
, respectively.
53
The Revolving Loan Facility is primarily used for working capital and other general corporate purposes of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the issuance of letters of credit. Borrowings under the Secured Credit Facility, pursuant to terms defined in the Secured Credit Facility, shall be either (i) Alternate Base Rate ("ABR") borrowings, which bear interest from the applicable borrowing date at a rate per annum equal to (x) the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate in effect on such day, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate in effect on such day plus 0.50% per annum and (c) the Adjusted LIBO Rate on such day (or, if such day is not a business day, the immediately preceding business day) plus 1.00% per annum (provided that if the LIBO Rate is less than 1.00%, then the LIBO Rate shall be deemed to be 1.00%), plus (y) the Applicable Rate, or (ii) Eurodollar borrowings, which bear interest from the applicable borrowing date at a rate per annum equal to (x) the Adjusted LIBO Rate for such interest period (provided that if the LIBO Rate is less than 1.00%, then the LIBO Rate shall be deemed to be 1.00%) plus (y) the Applicable Rate. The Applicable Rate is determined based on a pricing grid that is dependent upon our leverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter. The Secured Credit Facility contains customary representations, warranties and affirmative covenants and customary negative covenants, subject to negotiated exceptions, on (i) liens, (ii) investments, (iii) indebtedness, (iv) significant corporate changes, including mergers and acquisitions, (v) dispositions, (vi) restricted payments, including stockholder dividends, and (vii) certain other restrictive agreements. The Secured Credit Facility also contains certain financial covenants and customary events of default (subject to grace periods, as appropriate), such as payment defaults, cross-defaults to other material indebtedness, bankruptcy and insolvency, the occurrence of a defined change in control and the failure to observe the negative covenants and other covenants related to the operation of our business.
At
April 30, 2017
, our Secured Credit Facility required that we maintain compliance with various financial covenants including a maximum allowable Leverage Ratio and a minimum required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as such terms were defined. The maximum allowable Leverage Ratio, in simple terms, represented the net difference of Total Indebtedness (excluding unamortized deferred financing costs) less Available Cash (up to
$50.0 million
) divided by our TTM Consolidated EBITDA. The definition of Consolidated EBITDA was similar to our Adjusted EBITDA metric (which is fully described in
"Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (15) - Segment Information"
); however, Adjusted EBITDA was reduced by favorable adjustments to operating income related to the settlements of certain TCS intellectual property matters (which are discussed in
"Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (19) - Legal Proceedings and Other Matters"
). The minimum required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, in simple terms, represented Consolidated EBITDA less cash paid for taxes, capital expenditures and dividends, the result of which was then divided by the sum of scheduled principal debt payments and cash paid for interest, all of the aforementioned calculated on a TTM basis. Further, if we had more than
$50.0 million
of cash and cash equivalents for any financial covenant measurement period, the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio would be calculated without a deduction for cash dividends. For the measurement period ended on
April 30, 2017
, based on these definitions, our Leverage Ratio was
2.56
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA (as compared to a maximum allowable of
3.00
x) and our Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio was
2.53
x (as compared to a minimum requirement of
1.25
x) and we were in full compliance with the terms and conditions of our Secured Credit Facility.
On June 6, 2017, we entered into a First Amendment of the Secured Credit Facility (the “June 2017 Amendment”) that is expected to result in increased operating and acquisition flexibility and simplify the calculations of our financial covenants. The June 2017 Amendment resulted in, among other things, that the:
|
(i)
|
Consolidated EBITDA definition will now more closely align with our Adjusted EBITDA metric by eliminating favorable adjustments to operating income related to settlements of TCS intellectual property matters;
|
(ii) Leverage Ratio will now be calculated on a “gross” basis using the quotient of Total Indebtedness (excluding unamortized deferred financing costs) divided by our TTM Consolidated EBITDA. The prior Leverage Ratio was calculated on a “net” basis but did not include a reduction for any cash or cash equivalents above
$50.0 million
;
(iii) Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio will now include a deduction for all cash dividends, regardless of the amount of our cash and cash equivalents and the related allowable Quarterly Dividend Amount, as defined, will now align with our current quarterly dividend target of
$0.10
per common share;
(iv) Balloon or final payment of the Term Loan Facility, which is not due until February 23, 2021, was reduced by
$22.5 million
through increased borrowings from the Revolving Loan Facility, which does not expire until February 23, 2021; and
(v) Leverage Ratios will be adjusted, in certain conditions, to provide for additional flexibility for us to make acquisitions.
54
In connection with the June 2017 Amendment, there were no changes to: (i) the committed borrowing capacity; (ii) the maturity date; or (iii) interest rates payable (except that the interest rate pricing grid will now be based on the new Leverage Ratio). Also, the June 2017 Amendment did not result in an extinguishment for accounting purposes (as such term is defined in ASC 470 - “Debt”). As a result, deferred financing costs (including incremental fees for the June 2017 Amendment) will continue to be amortized over the remaining maturity term of the Secured Credit Facility.
The terms and financial covenants of the June 2017 Amendment are retroactive to
April 30, 2017
. Based on the simplified financial covenant calculations described above, our Leverage Ratio was
3.89
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA (as compared to a maximum allowable of
4.25
x) and our Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio was
1.70
x (as compared to a minimum requirement of
1.25
x). Assuming we had reduced the borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan Facility at April 30, 2017 by
$22.5 million
using our cash and cash equivalents, our Leverage Ratio, on a pro-forma basis, would have been
3.52
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA for the measurement period ended on
April 30, 2017
. Based on the aforementioned, we were in full compliance with the retroactive terms and financial covenants in our Secured Credit Facility, as amended.
For our fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the maximum allowable Leverage Ratio will decrease to
3.75
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA. In fiscal 2018, such ratio will decrease further each quarter until reaching
3.00
x TTM Consolidated EBITDA in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, with no further reductions thereafter. The minimum required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of
1.25
x will not change for the remaining term of the Secured Credit Facility. Given our expected future business performance, we anticipate maintaining compliance with the terms and financial covenants in our Secured Credit Facility, as amended, for the foreseeable future.
The obligations under the Secured Credit Facility, as amended, are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). As collateral security for amounts outstanding under our Secured Credit Facility, as amended, and the guarantees thereof, we and our Subsidiary Guarantors have granted to an administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, a lien on, and first priority security interest in, substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets.
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth for such terms in the Secured Credit Facility, dated as of February 23, 2016, and the First Amendment of the Secured Credit Facility, dated as of June 6, 2017, both of which have been documented and filed with the SEC.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of
April 30, 2017
, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
COMMITMENTS
In the normal course of business, other than as discussed below, we routinely enter into binding and non-binding purchase obligations primarily covering anticipated purchases of inventory and equipment. We do not expect that these commitments, as of
April 30, 2017
, will materially adversely affect our liquidity.
At
April 30, 2017
, cash payments due under long-term obligations (including interest on our Secured Credit Facility), excluding purchase orders that we entered into in our normal course of business, are as follows:
|
|
Obligations Due by Fiscal Years or Maturity Date (in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
Remainder
of 2017 |
2018
and 2019 |
2020
and 2021 |
After
2021 |
|||||||||||
|
Secured Credit Facility, including interest
|
$
|
265,644
|
|
5,597
|
|
51,568
|
|
208,479
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Operating lease commitments
|
48,322
|
|
3,726
|
|
20,462
|
|
12,057
|
|
12,077
|
|
||||||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
5,164
|
|
918
|
|
3,942
|
|
304
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net contractual cash obligations
|
$
|
319,130
|
|
10,241
|
|
75,972
|
|
220,840
|
|
12,077
|
|
|||||
As discussed further in
“Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (10) - Secured Credit Facility,"
on June 6, 2017, we entered into the June 2017 Amendment to our Secured Credit Facility. In connection with this amendment, the balloon or final payment of the Term Loan Facility, which is not due until February 23, 2021, was reduced by
$22.5 million
through increased borrowings from the Revolving Loan Facility which is not required to be repaid in full until February 23, 2021.
55
As discussed further in
“Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note (18) - Stockholders’ Equity,”
on
June 7, 2017
, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.10
per common share, payable on
August 18, 2017
to stockholders of record at the close of business on
July 17, 2017
. Future dividends remain subject to compliance with financial covenants under our Secured Credit Facility as well as Board approval.
At
April 30, 2017
, we have approximately
$3.8 million
of standby letters of credit outstanding under our Secured Credit Facility related to our guarantees of future performance on certain customer contracts. Such amounts are not included in the above table.
In the ordinary course of business, we include indemnification provisions in certain of our customer contracts. Pursuant to these agreements, we have agreed to indemnify, hold harmless and reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, including but not limited to losses related to third-party intellectual property claims. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these agreements due to a history of nominal claims in the Comtech legacy business and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. As discussed further in "
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (19) - Legal Proceedings and Other Matters,
" TCS is a party to one indemnification matter and we are incurring ongoing legal expenses in connection with this matter. Our insurance policies may not cover the cost of defending indemnification claims or providing indemnification. As a result, pending or future claims asserted against us by a party that we have agreed to indemnify could result in legal costs and damages that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
We have change in control agreements, severance agreements and indemnification agreements with certain of our executive officers and certain key employees. All of these agreements may require payments by us, in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, a change in control of our Company or an involuntary termination of employment without cause.
Our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
April 30, 2017
includes total liabilities of
$8.7 million
for uncertain tax positions, including interest, any or all of which may result in a cash payment. The future payments related to uncertain tax positions have not been presented in the table above due to the uncertainty of the amounts and timing of any potential cash settlement with the taxing authorities.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
We are required to prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) which is the source for all authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which is commonly referred to as “GAAP.” The FASB ASC is subject to updates by the FASB, which are known as Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”).
As further discussed in
“Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (3) - Adoption of Accounting Standards and Updates,”
during the
nine months ended April 30, 2017
, we adopted:
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2014-12, which requires that a performance target which affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. Our adoption of this FASB ASU did not impact our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2014-15, which provides guidance about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is a substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Our adoption of this ASU did not impact our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2015-11, which simplifies the guidance on the subsequent measurement of inventory other than inventory measured using the last-in, first out or the retail inventory method. This ASU requires in-scope inventory to be subsequently measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value, the latter of which is defined as the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-07, which eliminates the requirement to retroactively adopt the equity method of accounting for an investment as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
56
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-17, which amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity (that is the single decision maker of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”)) should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-18, which requires that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2017-01, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Our early adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
|
In addition, the following FASB ASUs have been issued and incorporated into the FASB ASC and have not yet been adopted by us as of
April 30, 2017
:
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2014-09, issued in May 2014, which replaces numerous requirements in U.S. GAAP, including industry specific requirements, and provides a single revenue recognition model for contracts with customers. The core principle of the new standard is that a company should record revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, FASB ASU No. 2015-14 was issued to defer the effective date of FASB ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. As a result, FASB ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2018), including interim reporting periods within those fiscal years and can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted only as of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2017), including interim reporting periods within those fiscal years. In March 2016, April 2016, May 2016 and February 2017 FASB ASU Nos. 2016-08, 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2017-05 were issued, respectively, to clarify certain implementation matters related to the new revenue standard. The effective dates for these ASUs coincide with the effective date of FASB ASU 2014-09. We are evaluating which transition approach to use and the impact of these ASUs on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-01, issued January 2016, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments, such as: amending the initial and subsequent measurement requirements for certain equity investments; eliminating the disclosure requirements related to the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; requiring the use of the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; and requiring separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset or liability on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2018), including interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, except for the provisions related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values which are to be adopted prospectively. Under certain circumstances, early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-02, issued in February 2016, which requires lessees to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases): (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments; and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2019), including interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied with a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
57
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-06, issued in March 2016, which clarifies the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options, that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments, are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. An entity performing the assessment under the amendments in this ASU is required to assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with the Derivatives Implementation Group’s four-step decision sequence. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2017), and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing debt instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the amendments are effective. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-09, issued in March 2016, which amends several aspects of the accounting for and reporting of share-based payment transactions, including: the recognition of excess tax benefits and shortfalls in the income statement; the classification of excess tax benefits as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows; the timing of recognizing forfeitures; permitting the withholding of statutory taxes up to the maximum rate in the applicable jurisdictions; and the classification of cash paid by an employer, when withholding shares for tax withholdings, as a financing activity. The amendments related to this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2017), and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively, as applicable. Early adoption is permitted; however, all of the amendments must be adopted in the same period. We are evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-13, issued in June 2016, which requires the measurement of expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date to be based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2020), including interim periods within those fiscal years. All entities may adopt the amendments in this ASU earlier as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for a prospective transition approach required for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date, an entity will apply the amendments in this ASU through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, on a modified-retrospective approach). We are evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-15, issued in August 2016, which amends the guidance on the following cash flow related issues: debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero-coupon and similar type debt instruments; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims (including those related to certain life insurance policies); distributions received from equity method investees; beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and cash receipts or payments with more than one class of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2018), and interim periods within those fiscal years and shall be applied using the retrospective transition method to each period presented. Early adoption is permitted; however, all of the amendments must be adopted in the same period. We are evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2016-16, issued in October 2016, which eliminates a prior exception and now requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory (for example, intellectual property and property, plant and equipment) when the transfer occurs. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2018), and interim periods within those fiscal years and shall be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2017-04, issued in January 2017, which simplifies the measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, impairment will be measured using the excess amount that a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value; however, any loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This ASU is to be applied on a prospective basis and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2020), and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We are evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
58
|
•
|
FASB ASU No. 2017-09, issued in May 2017, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in ASC Topic 718. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2018) and early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued. This ASU should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date of this ASU. We are evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in interest rates primarily from borrowings under our Secured Credit Facility. Based on the amount of outstanding debt under our Secured Credit Facility, a hypothetical change in interest rates by 10% would change interest expense by $1.0 million over a one-year period. Although we do not currently use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes, we may choose to do so in the future in connection with our Secured Credit Facility.
Our earnings and cash flows are also subject to fluctuations due to changes in interest rates on our investment of available cash balances. As of
April 30, 2017
, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$58.8 million
, which consisted of cash and highly-liquid money market deposit accounts. Many of these investments are subject to fluctuations in interest rates, which could impact our results. Based on our investment portfolio balance as of
April 30, 2017
, a hypothetical change in interest rates of 10% would have a nominal impact on interest income over a one-year period. Ultimately, the availability of our cash and cash equivalents is dependent on a well-functioning liquid market.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), was carried out by us under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by the report to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. A system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system of controls are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
We acquired TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("TCS") on February 23, 2016 and have integrated TCS into our existing internal controls over financial reporting. We continue to make changes and related enhancements to the TCS controls as part of our evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting based on the 2013 framework established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Except for any changes and related enhancements in internal controls related to TCS, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
The certifications of our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, that are Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2, respectively, should be read in conjunction with the foregoing information for a more complete understanding of the references in those Exhibits to disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
59
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
See
“Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (19) - Legal Proceedings and Other Matters,”
of this Form 10-Q for information regarding legal proceedings and other matters.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2016.
Our tactical shift in our Government Solutions segment toward pursuing contracts with higher margins may not prove successful.
We are undertaking a shift in efforts in our Government Solutions segment away from bidding on large commodity service contracts and toward pursuing contracts for our niche products with higher margins. In the near term, that strategy has resulted, and may continue to result, in lower net sales and gross profit, in dollars, in our Government Solutions segment. Although we believe this tactical shift will ultimately yield higher gross profit, in dollars, as well as higher gross profit as a percentage of net sales, we may not be able to successfully execute this strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 6.
Exhibits
|
(a)
|
Exhibits
|
Exhibit 101.INS - XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.PRE - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.DEF - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
June 7, 2017
|
By:
/s/ Fred Kornberg
|
|
Fred Kornberg
|
||
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
||
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
|
Date:
|
June 7, 2017
|
By:
/s/ Michael D. Porcelain
|
|
Michael D. Porcelain
|
||
|
Senior Vice President and
|
||
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
||
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
||
61
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I - Financial InformationItem 1. Financial StatementsItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 4. Controls and ProceduresPart IIItem 1. Legal ProceedingsItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresItem 6. Exhibits