CNA 10-Q Quarterly Report Sept. 30, 2010

CNA FINANCIAL CORP

10-Ks and 10-Qs

10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009

PROXIES

DEF 14A	Filed on April 30, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on March 21, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on May 1, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on March 22, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on March 17, 2023
DEF 14A	Filed on April 27, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on March 18, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on March 19, 2021
DEF 14A	Filed on March 20, 2020
DEF 14A	Filed on March 15, 2019
DEF 14A	Filed on March 16, 2018
DEF 14A	Filed on March 17, 2017
DEF 14A	Filed on March 18, 2016
DEF 14A	Filed on March 20, 2015
DEF 14A	Filed on March 10, 2014
DEF 14A	Filed on March 12, 2013
DEF 14A	Filed on March 9, 2012
DEF 14A	Filed on March 24, 2011
DEF 14A	Filed on April 2, 2010

10-Q 1 c60996e10vq.htm FORM 10-Q e10vq

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010


o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission File Number 1-5823

CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		36-6169860 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


333 S. Wabash Chicago, Illinois (Address of principal executive offices)		60604 (Zip Code)

(312) 822-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at October 29, 2010
Common Stock, Par value $2.50		269,218,836


Item	Page
Number	Number
PART I. Financial Information

1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		5

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		6

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		7

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		9

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		10

2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		54

3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		73

4. Controls and Procedures		74

PART II. Other Information

1. Legal Proceedings		75

1A. Risk Factors		75

6. Exhibits		75
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

CNA Financial Corporation

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)


Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions, except per share data)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Revenues
Net earned premiums	$	1,645		$	1,707		$	4,868		$	5,035
Net investment income		581			660			1,692			1,755
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders’ interests:
Other-than-temporary impairment losses		(41	)		(232	)		(189	)		(1,330	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in Other comprehensive income		(3	)		84			28			173


Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings		(44	)		(148	)		(161	)		(1,157	)
Other net realized investment gains		106			48			286			228


Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders’ interests		62			(100	)		125			(929	)

Other revenues		75			73			226			213


Total revenues		2,363			2,340			6,911			6,074


Claims, Benefits and Expenses
Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits		1,344			1,283			3,799			3,919
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		351			365			1,038			1,063
Other operating expenses (Note G)		795			272			1,325			814
Interest		40			34			113			95


Total claims, benefits and expenses		2,530			1,954			6,275			5,891


Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax		(167	)		386			636			183
Income tax (expense) benefit		64			(108	)		(183	)		30


Income (loss) from continuing operations		(103	)		278			453			213
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $0, $0, $0 and $0 (Note G)		(22	)		(1	)		(21	)		(2	)


Net income (loss)		(125	)		277			432			211
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		(15	)		(14	)		(44	)		(38	)


Net income (loss) attributable to CNA	$	(140	)	$	263		$	388		$	173


Income (Loss) Attributable to CNA Common Stockholders

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA	$	(118	)	$	264		$	409		$	175
Dividends on 2008 Senior Preferred		(18	)		(31	)		(68	)		(94	)


Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA common stockholders		(136	)		233			341			81
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to CNA common stockholders		(22	)		(1	)		(21	)		(2	)


Income (loss) attributable to CNA common stockholders	$	(158	)	$	232		$	320		$	79

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).


Periods ended September 30		Three Months					Nine Months
(In millions, except per share data)	2010			2009		2010			2009
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to CNA Common Stockholders

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA common stockholders	$	(0.51	)	$	0.86	$	1.27		$	0.30
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to CNA common stockholders		(0.08	)		—		(0.08	)		(0.01	)


Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to CNA common stockholders	$	(0.59	)	$	0.86	$	1.19		$	0.29


Weighted Average Outstanding Common Stock and Common Stock Equivalents

Basic		269.2			269.0		269.1			269.0

Diluted		269.2			269.2		269.4			269.1

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).

CNA Financial Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)


Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax

Changes in:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments with other-than-temporary impairments	$	39		$	(36	)	$	81		$	(70	)
Net unrealized gains on other investments		726			1,906			1,426			3,815

Net unrealized gains on investments		765			1,870			1,507			3,745
Net unrealized gains on discontinued operations and other		3			5			11			5
Foreign currency translation adjustment		37			39			44			110
Pension and postretirement benefits		2			1			5			4
Allocation to participating policyholders		(9	)		(17	)		(37	)		(36	)


Other comprehensive income, net of tax		798			1,898			1,530			3,828
Net income (loss)		(125	)		277			432			211


Comprehensive income		673			2,175			1,962			4,039

Changes in:
Net unrealized (gains) losses on investments attributable to noncontrolling interests		(13	)		(18	)		(27	)		(29	)
Pension and postretirement benefits attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			(3	)		—


Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		(13	)		(18	)		(30	)		(29	)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		(15	)		(14	)		(44	)		(38	)

Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		(28	)		(32	)		(74	)		(67	)

Total comprehensive income attributable to CNA	$	645		$	2,143		$	1,888		$	3,972

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).

CNA Financial Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)


	September 30,			December 31,
(In millions, except share data)	2010			2009
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities at fair value (amortized cost of $36,381 and $35,602)	$	38,646		$	35,612
Equity securities at fair value (cost of $465 and $633)		531			644
Limited partnership investments		2,166			1,787
Other invested assets		29			4
Mortgage loans		70			—
Short term investments		2,084			3,949

Total investments		43,526			41,996
Cash		82			140
Reinsurance receivables (less allowance for uncollectible receivables of $144 and $351)		7,333			6,581
Insurance receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $172 and $202)		1,606			1,656
Accrued investment income		461			416
Deferred acquisition costs		1,096			1,108
Deferred income taxes		367			1,333
Property and equipment at cost (less accumulated depreciation of $531 and $498)		337			360
Goodwill and other intangible assets		141			141
Other assets		1,470			1,144
Separate account business		462			423

Total assets	$	56,881		$	55,298


Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities:
Insurance reserves:
Claim and claim adjustment expenses	$	25,783		$	26,816
Unearned premiums		3,265			3,274
Future policy benefits		8,372			7,981
Policyholders’ funds		164			192
Participating policyholders’ funds		72			56
Short term debt		400			—
Long term debt		2,251			2,303
Other liabilities		3,547			3,087
Separate account business		462			423

Total liabilities		44,316			44,132


Commitments and contingencies (Notes D, E, H, and J)

Equity:
Preferred stock (12,500,000 shares authorized) 2008 Senior Preferred (no par value; $100,000 stated value; 5,000 and 10,000 shares issued and outstanding held by Loews Corporation)		500			1,000
Common stock ($2.50 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 273,040,243 shares issued; 269,203,836 and 269,026,759 shares outstanding)		683			683
Additional paid-in capital		2,201			2,177
Retained earnings		7,582			7,264
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		1,177			(325	)
Treasury stock (3,836,407 and 4,013,484 shares), at cost		(103	)		(109	)
Notes receivable for the issuance of common stock		(30	)		(30	)

Total CNA stockholders’ equity		12,010			10,660
Noncontrolling interests		555			506

Total equity		12,565			11,166

Total liabilities and equity	$	56,881		$	55,298

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).

CNA Financial Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)


Nine months ended September 30
(In millions)	2010			2009
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	432		$	211
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided (used) by operating activities:
Loss from discontinued operations		21			2
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment		—			13
Deferred income tax expense		163			81
Trading portfolio activity		125			(621	)
Net realized investment (gains) losses, net of participating policyholders’ interests		(125	)		929
Equity method investees		(25	)		(151	)
Amortization of investments		(84	)		(169	)
Depreciation		60			63
Changes in:
Receivables, net		(709	)		849
Accrued investment income		(51	)		(73	)
Deferred acquisition costs		12			(13	)
Insurance reserves		(563	)		(488	)
Other assets		168			(192	)
Other liabilities		(11	)		(154	)
Other, net		3			4


Total adjustments		(1,016	)		80


Net cash flows provided (used) by operating activities-continuing operations	$	(584	)	$	291
Net cash flows used by operating activities-discontinued operations	$	(89	)	$	(16	)

Net cash flows provided (used) by operating activities-total	$	(673	)	$	275


Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchases of fixed maturity securities	$	(12,981	)	$	(18,099	)
Proceeds from fixed maturity securities:
Sales		9,263			15,507
Maturities, calls and redemptions		2,891			2,568
Purchases of equity securities		(92	)		(262	)
Proceeds from sales of equity securities		215			510
Origination of mortgage loans		(70	)		—
Change in short term investments		1,752			(460	)
Change in other investments		(227	)		101
Purchases of property and equipment		(38	)		(46	)
Dispositions		65			—
Other, net		7			(3	)


Net cash flows provided (used) by investing activities-continuing operations	$	785		$	(184	)
Net cash flows provided by investing activities-discontinued operations	$	75		$	16

Net cash flows provided (used) by investing activities-total	$	860		$	(168	)

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).


Nine months ended September 30
(In millions)	2010			2009
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Dividends paid to Loews Corporation for 2008 Senior Preferred	$	(68	)	$	(94	)
Payment to redeem 2008 Senior Preferred		(500	)		—
Proceeds from the issuance of debt		495			—
Principal payments on debt		(150	)		—
Policyholders’ investment contract net deposits (withdrawals)		(8	)		(7	)
Stock options exercised		4			1
Other, net		(18	)		28


Net cash flows used by financing activities-continuing operations	$	(245	)	$	(72	)
Net cash flows provided (used) by financing activities-discontinued operations	$	—		$	—

Net cash flows used by financing activities-total	$	(245	)	$	(72	)


Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash-continuing operations		—			8


Net change in cash		(58	)		43
Net cash transactions from continuing operations to discontinued operations		(14	)		—
Net cash transactions to discontinued operations from continuing operations		14			—

Cash, beginning of year		140			85


Cash, end of period	$	82		$	128


Cash-continuing operations	$	82		$	128
Cash-discontinued operations		—			—

Cash-total	$	82		$	128

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).

CNA Financial Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity (Unaudited)


Nine months ended September 30
(In millions)	2010			2009
Preferred Stock
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,000		$	1,250
Redemption of 2008 Senior Preferred		(500	)		—


Balance, end of period		500			1,250


Common Stock
Balance, beginning and end of period		683			683

Additional Paid-in Capital
Balance, beginning of period		2,177			2,174
Stock-based compensation		1			2
Other		23			—


Balance, end of period		2,201			2,176


Retained Earnings
Balance, beginning of period		7,264			6,845
Cumulative effect adjustment from change in other-than-temporary impairment accounting guidance as of April 1, 2009, net of tax		—			122
Cumulative effect adjustment from change in credit derivatives accounting guidance as of July 1, 2010, net of tax		(2	)		—
Dividends paid to Loews Corporation for 2008 Senior Preferred		(68	)		(94	)
Net income attributable to CNA		388			173


Balance, end of period		7,582			7,046


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance, beginning of period		(325	)		(3,924	)
Cumulative effect adjustment from change in other-than-temporary impairment accounting guidance as of April 1, 2009, net of tax		—			(122	)
Cumulative effect adjustment from change in credit derivatives accounting guidance as of July 1, 2010, net of tax		2			—
Other comprehensive income attributable to CNA		1,500			3,799

Balance, end of period		1,177			(247	)


Treasury Stock
Balance, beginning of period		(109	)		(109	)
Stock-based compensation		6			—


Balance, end of period		(103	)		(109	)


Notes Receivable for the Issuance of Common Stock
Balance, beginning of period		(30	)		(42	)
Decrease in notes receivable for the issuance of common stock		—			12


Balance, end of period		(30	)		(30	)


Total CNA Stockholders’ Equity		12,010			10,769


Noncontrolling Interests
Balance, beginning of period		506			420
Net income		44			38
Other comprehensive income		30			29
Other		(25	)		(1	)


Balance, end of period		555			486


Total Equity	$	12,565		$	11,255

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).

CNA Financial Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note A. Basis of Presentation

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) include the accounts of CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF) and its controlled subsidiaries. Collectively, CNAF and its controlled subsidiaries are referred to as CNA or the Company. CNA’s property and casualty and remaining life and group insurance operations are primarily conducted by Continental Casualty Company (CCC), The Continental Insurance Company (CIC), Continental Assurance Company (CAC) and CNA Surety Corporation (CNA Surety). The Company owned approximately 62% of the outstanding common stock of CNA Surety as of September 30, 2010. Loews Corporation (Loews) owned approximately 90% of the outstanding common stock of CNAF as of September 30, 2010.

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements, including certain financial statement notes, prepared in accordance with GAAP, is not required for interim reporting purposes and has been condensed or omitted. These statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in CNAF’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the year ended December 31, 2009. The preparation of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

The interim financial data as of September 30, 2010 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.

Note B. Accounting Standards Updates

Adopted

Scope Exception Related To Credit Derivatives

In March 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued updated accounting guidance which amended the accounting and reporting requirements related to derivatives to provide clarifying language regarding when embedded credit derivative features, including those in synthetic collateralized debt and loan obligations, are considered embedded derivatives subject to potential bifurcation. Transition provisions include an option at adoption to measure an investment in its entirety at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in earnings (the fair value option). The adoption of this updated accounting guidance as of July 1, 2010 resulted in a cumulative effect adjustment of $2 million, net of tax, which was reclassified to Retained earnings from Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity and was attributable to gross unrealized losses on securities with embedded credit derivative features for which the fair value option was elected. These securities are included in Other invested assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2010. Subsequent fair value changes are included in Other net realized investment gains on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

In April 2009, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance, which amended the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) loss model for fixed maturity securities. A fixed maturity security is impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its amortized cost basis, which is its cost adjusted for accretion, amortization and previously recorded OTTI losses. The updated accounting guidance requires an OTTI loss equal to the difference between fair value and amortized cost to be recognized in earnings if the Company intends to sell the fixed maturity security or if it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the fixed maturity security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.

The remaining fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to determine if a credit loss exists. If the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of a fixed maturity security, the security is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired for credit reasons. For these securities, the bifurcation of OTTI losses into a credit component and a non-credit component is required by the updated accounting guidance. The credit component is recognized in earnings and represents the difference between the present value of the future cash flows that the Company expects to collect and a fixed maturity security’s amortized cost basis. The non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income and represents the difference between fair value and the present value of the future cash flows that the Company expects to collect.

Prior to the adoption of the updated accounting guidance, OTTI losses were not bifurcated between credit and non-credit components. The difference between fair value and amortized cost was recognized in earnings for all securities for which the Company did not expect to recover the amortized cost basis, or for which the Company did not have the ability and intent to hold until recovery of fair value to amortized cost.

Recently issued accounting standard to be adopted

Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts

In October 2010, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance which limits the capitalization of costs incurred to acquire or renew insurance contracts to those that are incremental direct costs of successful contract acquisitions. The updated accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011 with prospective or retrospective application allowed. The Company is currently assessing the impact this updated accounting guidance will have on its financial condition and results of operations, and expects that amounts capitalized under the updated guidance will be less than under the Company’s current accounting practice.

Note C. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to the Company’s common stockholders is based on the weighted average outstanding shares. Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes the impact of dilutive securities and is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to CNA by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

For the three months ended September 30, 2010, as a result of the net loss, none of the 2.3 million potential shares attributable to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were included in the calculation of loss per share as the effect would have been antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 240 thousand potential shares attributable to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For that same period, approximately 1.2 million potential shares attributable to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been antidilutive.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, approximately 160 thousand and 90 thousand potential shares attributable to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For those same periods, approximately 1.7 million and 2.0 million potential shares attributable to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been antidilutive.

The 2008 Senior Preferred Stock (2008 Senior Preferred) was issued in November 2008 and accrues cumulative dividends at an initial rate of 10% per year. If declared, dividends are payable quarterly and any dividends not declared or paid when due will be compounded quarterly. In the third quarter of 2010, the Company issued $500 million of 5.875% ten-year senior notes and used the net proceeds of the offering, together with cash on hand, to redeem $500 million, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, of the 2008 Senior Preferred.

Note D. Investments

The significant components of net investment income are presented in the following table.

Net Investment Income


Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Fixed maturity securities	$	511		$	496		$	1,540		$	1,458
Short term investments		2			7			13			28
Limited partnerships		68			145			136			240
Equity securities		7			11			26			39
Mortgage loans		1			—			1			—
Trading portfolio (a)		4			12			10			20
Other		2			2			7			6


Gross investment income		595			673			1,733			1,791
Investment expense		(14	)		(13	)		(41	)		(36	)


Net investment income	$	581		$	660		$	1,692		$	1,755


(a)		The net unrealized gains related to changes in fair value on trading securities still held included in net investment income were $1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and $6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Net realized investment gains (losses) are presented in the following table.

Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)


Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net realized investment gains (losses):

Fixed maturity securities:
Gross realized gains	$	121		$	148		$	352		$	352
Gross realized losses		(45	)		(260	)		(183	)		(1,214	)


Net realized investment gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities		76			(112	)		169			(862	)

Equity securities:
Gross realized gains		3			20			7			97
Gross realized losses		(20	)		(1	)		(49	)		(230	)


Net realized investment gains (losses) on equity securities		(17	)		19			(42	)		(133	)

Derivatives		(1	)		(13	)		(1	)		51
Short term investments and other (a)		4			6			(1	)		15


Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders’ interests	$	62		$	(100	)	$	125		$	(929	)


(a)		Includes net unrealized gains related to changes in fair value on securities for which the fair value option was elected as a result of the adoption of the updated embedded credit derivative accounting guidance as of July 1, 2010. The net unrealized gains included for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $2 million.

The components of net OTTI losses recognized in earnings by asset type are summarized in the following table.


Periods ended September 30	Three Months				Nine Months
(In millions)	2010		2009		2010		2009
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale:

Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed	$	18	$	108	$	55	$	376
Commercial mortgage-backed		—		4		2		185
Other asset-backed		—		—		2		31

Total asset-backed		18		112		59		592

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		—		12		20		27
Corporate and other bonds		17		24		59		308
Redeemable preferred stock		—		—		—		9


Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale		35		148		138		936


Equity securities available-for-sale:
Common stock		5		—		10		4
Preferred stock		4		—		13		217


Total equity securities available-for-sale		9		—		23		221


Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings	$	44	$	148	$	161	$	1,157

A security is impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its cost adjusted for accretion, amortization and previously recorded OTTI losses, otherwise defined as an unrealized loss. When a security is impaired, the impairment is evaluated to determine whether it is temporary or other-than-temporary.

Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether an OTTI loss has occurred for a security. The Company follows a consistent and systematic process for determining and recording an OTTI loss. The Company has established a committee responsible for the OTTI process. This committee, referred to as the Impairment Committee, is made up of three officers appointed by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. The Impairment Committee is responsible for evaluating securities in an unrealized loss position on at least a quarterly basis.

The Impairment Committee’s assessment of whether an OTTI loss has occurred incorporates both quantitative and qualitative information. Fixed maturity securities that the Company intends to sell, or it more likely than not will be required to sell before recovery of amortized cost, are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired and the entire difference between the amortized cost basis and fair value of the security is recognized as an OTTI loss in earnings. The remaining fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to determine if a credit loss exists. In order to determine if a credit loss exists, the factors considered by the Impairment Committee include (a) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (b) whether the debtor is current on interest and principal payments, (c) credit ratings of the securities and (d) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook. The Company also considers results and analysis of cash flow modeling for asset-backed securities, and when appropriate, other fixed maturity securities. The focus of the analysis for asset-backed securities is on assessing the sufficiency and quality of underlying collateral and timing of cash flows based on scenario tests. If the present value of the modeled expected cash flows equals or exceeds the amortized cost of a security, no credit loss is judged to exist and the asset-backed security is deemed to be temporarily impaired. If the present value of the expected cash flows is less than amortized cost, the security is judged to be other-than-temporarily impaired for credit reasons and that shortfall, referred to as the credit component, is recognized as an OTTI loss in earnings. The difference between the adjusted amortized cost basis and fair value, referred to as the non-credit component, is recognized as OTTI in Other comprehensive income.

The Company performs the discounted cash flow analysis using stressed scenarios to determine future expectations regarding recoverability. For asset-backed securities, significant assumptions enter into these cash flow projections including delinquency rates, probable risk of default, loss severity upon a default, over collateralization and interest coverage triggers, credit support from lower level tranches and impacts of rating agency downgrades.

The Company applies the same impairment model as described above for the majority of non-redeemable preferred stock securities on the basis that these securities possess characteristics similar to debt securities and that the issuers maintain their ability to pay dividends. For all other equity securities, in determining whether the security is other-than-temporarily impaired, the Impairment Committee considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: (a) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, (b) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (c) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value and (d) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook.

Prior to the adoption of the updated accounting guidance related to OTTI in the second quarter of 2009 as further discussed in Note B, the Company applied the impairment model described in the paragraph above to both fixed maturity and equity securities.

The following tables provide a summary of fixed maturity and equity securities.

Summary of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities


	Cost or		Gross		Gross		Estimated		Unrealized
September 30, 2010	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		OTTI
(In millions)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Losses
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government agencies	$	130	$	18	$	1	$	147	$	—

Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed		6,089		154		267		5,976		214
Commercial mortgage-backed		1,032		34		65		1,001		—
Other asset-backed		650		23		8		665		—

Total asset-backed		7,771		211		340		7,642		214

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		7,782		472		246		8,008		—
Foreign government		590		25		—		615		—
Corporate and other bonds		20,035		2,189		69		22,155		—
Redeemable preferred stock		47		6		—		53		—


Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale		36,355		2,921		656		38,620	$	214


Total fixed maturity securities trading		26		—		—		26


Equity securities available-for-sale:
Common stock		94		19		1		112
Preferred stock		371		55		7		419


Total equity securities available-for-sale		465		74		8		531


Total	$	36,846	$	2,995	$	664	$	39,177

Summary of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities


	Cost or		Gross		Gross		Estimated		Unrealized
December 31, 2009	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		OTTI
(In millions)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Losses
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government agencies	$	184	$	16	$	1	$	199	$	—

Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed		7,469		72		604		6,937		246
Commercial mortgage-backed		709		10		135		584		3
Other asset-backed		858		14		40		832		—

Total asset-backed		9,036		96		779		8,353		249

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		7,280		203		359		7,124		—
Foreign government		467		14		2		479		—
Corporate and other bonds		18,410		1,107		288		19,229		26
Redeemable preferred stock		51		4		1		54		—


Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale		35,428		1,440		1,430		35,438	$	275


Total fixed maturity securities trading		174		—		—		174


Equity securities available-for-sale:
Common stock		61		14		2		73
Preferred stock		572		40		41		571


Total equity securities available-for-sale		633		54		43		644


Total	$	36,235	$	1,494	$	1,473	$	36,256

The following tables summarize the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities by the length of time in which the securities have continuously been in a gross unrealized loss position.

Securities in a Gross Unrealized Loss Position


	Less than 12 Months				Greater than 12 Months				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
September 30, 2010	Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
(In millions)	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government agencies	$	—	$	—	$	10	$	1	$	10	$	1

Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed		636		10		2,086		257		2,722		267
Commercial mortgage-backed		122		1		321		64		443		65
Other asset-backed		24		—		60		8		84		8

Total asset-backed		782		11		2,467		329		3,249		340

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		151		4		1,344		242		1,495		246
Corporate and other bonds		472		9		745		60		1,217		69


Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale		1,405		24		4,566		632		5,971		656


Equity securities available-for-sale:
Common stock		13		1		1		—		14		1
Preferred stock		64		1		135		6		199		7


Total equity securities available-for-sale		77		2		136		6		213		8


Total	$	1,482	$	26	$	4,702	$	638	$	6,184	$	664

Securities in a Gross Unrealized Loss Position


	Less than 12 Months				Greater than 12 Months				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
December 31, 2009	Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
(In millions)	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government agencies	$	21	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	21	$	1

Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed		1,945		43		3,069		561		5,014		604
Commercial mortgage-backed		21		1		456		134		477		135
Other asset-backed		170		1		119		39		289		40

Total asset-backed		2,136		45		3,644		734		5,780		779

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		1,036		30		2,086		329		3,122		359
Foreign government		154		1		7		1		161		2
Corporate and other bonds		2,395		44		1,948		244		4,343		288
Redeemable preferred stock		3		—		14		1		17		1


Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale		5,745		121		7,699		1,309		13,444		1,430


Equity securities available-for-sale:
Common stock		8		1		12		1		20		2
Preferred stock		—		—		426		41		426		41


Total equity securities available-for-sale		8		1		438		42		446		43


Total	$	5,753	$	122	$	8,137	$	1,351	$	13,890	$	1,473

The amount of pretax net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities reclassified out of AOCI into earnings was $62 million and $133 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The amount of pretax net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities reclassified out of AOCI into earnings was $92 million and $989 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Activity for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to the pretax fixed maturity credit loss component reflected within Retained earnings for securities still held at September 30, 2010 was as follows.


	Three Months ended			Nine Months ended
(In millions)	September 30, 2010			September 30, 2010
Beginning balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities	$	171		$	164

Additional credit losses for which an OTTI loss was previously recognized		4			26
Credit losses for which an OTTI loss was not previously recognized		1			9
Reductions for securities sold during the period		(27	)		(50	)
Reductions for securities the Company intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell		(8	)		(8	)


Ending balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities	$	141		$	141

Activity for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and for the period from April 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009 related to the pretax fixed maturity credit loss component reflected within Retained earnings for securities still held at September 30, 2009 was as follows.


				Period from
	Three Months ended			April 1, 2009 to
(In millions)	September 30, 2009			September 30, 2009
Beginning balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities	$	212		$	192

Additional credit losses for which an OTTI loss was previously recognized		57			78
Credit losses for which an OTTI loss was not previously recognized		65			149
Reductions for securities sold during the period		(114	)		(150	)
Reductions for securities the Company intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell		(11	)		(60	)

Ending balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities	$	209		$	209

Based on current facts and circumstances, the Company has determined that no additional OTTI losses related to the securities in an unrealized loss position presented in the September 30, 2010 Securities in a Gross Unrealized Loss Position table above are required to be recorded. A discussion of some of the factors reviewed in making that determination is presented below.

The classification between investment grade and non-investment grade presented in the discussion below is based on a ratings methodology that takes into account ratings from two major providers, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s) in that order of preference. If a security is not rated by these providers, the Company formulates an internal rating. For securities with credit support from third party guarantees, the rating reflects the greater of the underlying rating of the issuer or the insured rating.

Asset-Backed Securities

The fair value of total asset-backed holdings at September 30, 2010 was $7,642 million which was comprised of 2,094 different asset-backed structured securities. The fair value of these securities does not tend to be influenced by the credit of the issuer but rather the characteristics and projected cash flows of the underlying collateral. Each security has deal-specific tranche structures, credit support that results from the unique deal structure, particular collateral characteristics and other distinct security terms. As a result, seemingly common factors such as delinquency rates and collateral performance affect each security differently. Of these securities, 173 have underlying collateral that is either considered sub-prime or Alt-A in nature. The exposure to sub-prime residential mortgage (sub-prime) collateral and Alternative A residential mortgages that have lower than normal standards of loan documentation (Alt-A) collateral is measured by the original deal structure.

Residential mortgage-backed securities include 185 non-agency structured securities in a gross unrealized loss position. In addition, there were 49 agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities which are guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. Government in a gross unrealized loss position. The aggregate severity of the gross unrealized loss for residential mortgage-backed securities was approximately 9% of amortized cost.

Commercial mortgage-backed securities include 29 securities in a gross unrealized loss position. The aggregate severity of the gross unrealized loss was approximately 13% of amortized cost.

Other asset-backed securities include 10 securities in a gross unrealized loss position. The aggregate severity of the gross unrealized loss was approximately 9% of amortized cost.

The following table summarizes asset-backed securities in a gross unrealized loss position by ratings distribution at September 30, 2010.

Gross Unrealized Losses by Ratings Distribution


September 30, 2010	Amortized		Estimated		Gross Unrealized
(in millions)	Cost		Fair Value		Losses
U.S. Government Agencies	$	492	$	486	$	6
AAA		1,307		1,217		90
AA		235		204		31
A		286		240		46
BBB		243		210		33
Non-investment grade and equity tranches		1,026		892		134
Total	$	3,589	$	3,249	$	340

The Company believes the unrealized losses are primarily attributable to broader economic conditions and wider than historical bid/ask spreads, and are not indicative of the quality of the underlying collateral. The Company has no current intent to sell these securities, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost. Generally, non-investment grade securities consist of investments which were investment grade at the time of purchase but have subsequently been downgraded and primarily consist of holdings senior to the equity tranche. Additionally, the Company believes that the unrealized losses on these securities were not due to factors regarding the ultimate collection of amortized cost and interest, collateral shortfalls, or substantial changes in future cash flow expectations; accordingly, the Company has determined that there are no additional OTTI losses to be recorded at September 30, 2010.

States, Municipalities and Political Subdivisions Securities

The holdings in this portfolio consist of both tax-exempt and taxable special revenue and assessment bonds, representing 71% of the overall portfolio, followed by general obligation political subdivision bonds at 20% and state general obligation bonds at 9%.

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in this portfolio are due to market conditions in certain sectors or states that continued to lag behind the broader municipal market performance. Yields for certain issuers and types of securities, such as zero coupon bonds, auction rate securities and tobacco securitizations, continue to be higher than historical norms relative to after-tax returns on similar fixed income alternatives. The holdings for all securities in this category include 148 securities in a gross unrealized loss position. The aggregate severity of the gross unrealized losses was approximately 14% of amortized cost.

The following table summarizes the ratings distribution of states, municipalities and political subdivisions securities in a gross unrealized loss position at September 30, 2010.

Gross Unrealized Losses by Ratings Distribution


September 30, 2010	Amortized		Estimated		Gross Unrealized
(In millions)	Cost		Fair Value		Losses
AAA	$	632	$	597	$	35
AA		447		359		88
A		156		148		8
BBB		484		370		114
Non-investment grade		22		21		1

Total	$	1,741	$	1,495	$	246

The largest exposures at September 30, 2010 as measured by gross unrealized losses were special revenue bonds issued by several states backed by tobacco settlement funds with gross unrealized losses of $109 million, and several separate issues of Puerto Rico sales tax revenue bonds with gross unrealized losses of $70 million. All of these securities are rated investment grade.

The Company has no current intent to sell these securities, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost. Additionally, the Company believes that the unrealized losses on these securities were not due to factors regarding the ultimate collection of principal and interest; accordingly, the Company has determined that there are no additional OTTI losses to be recorded at September 30, 2010.

Contractual Maturity

The following table summarizes available-for-sale fixed maturity securities by contractual maturity at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain securities may be called or prepaid with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single date are allocated based on weighted average life.

Contractual Maturity


	September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Cost or		Estimated		Cost or		Estimated
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
(In millions)	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Due in one year or less	$	1,198	$	1,200	$	1,240	$	1,219
Due after one year through five years		10,948		11,528		10,046		10,244
Due after five years through ten years		10,233		10,829		10,646		10,538
Due after ten years		13,976		15,063		13,496		13,437

Total	$	36,355	$	38,620	$	35,428	$	35,438

Investment Commitments

As of September 30, 2010, the Company had committed approximately $210 million to future capital calls from various third-party limited partnership investments in exchange for an ownership interest in the related partnerships.

The Company invests in various privately placed debt securities, including bank loans, as part of its overall investment strategy and has committed to additional future purchases and sales. The purchase and sale of these investments are recorded on the date that the legal agreements are finalized and cash settlements are made. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had commitments to purchase $242 million and sell $85 million of such investments.

Mortgage Loans

Mortgage loans are commercial in nature and are carried at unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized fees and any valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is established for impaired loans when it is probable that contractual principal and interest will not be collected. Allowances for losses are determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. As of September 30, 2010, there was no valuation allowance for mortgage loans.

Interest income from mortgage loans is recognized on an accrual basis using the effective yield method. Accrual of income is suspended for mortgage loans that are in default or when full and timely collection of principal and interest payments is not probable.

Note E. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivatives in the normal course of business, primarily in an attempt to reduce its exposure to market risk (principally interest rate risk, equity price risk and foreign currency risk) stemming from various assets and liabilities and credit risk (the ability of an obligor to make timely payment of principal and/or interest). The Company’s principal objective under such risk strategies is to achieve the desired reduction in economic risk, even if the position does not receive hedge accounting treatment.

The Company’s use of derivatives is limited by statutes and regulations promulgated by the various regulatory bodies to which it is subject, and by its own derivative policy. The derivative policy limits the authorization to initiate derivative transactions to certain personnel. Derivatives entered into for hedging, regardless of the choice to designate hedge accounting, shall have a maturity that effectively correlates to the underlying hedged asset or liability. The policy prohibits the use of derivatives containing greater than one-to-one leverage with respect to changes in the underlying price, rate or index. The policy also prohibits the use of borrowed funds, including funds obtained through securities lending, to engage in derivative transactions.

The Company has exposure to economic losses due to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level of, or volatility of, interest rates. The Company attempts to mitigate its exposure to interest rate risk in the normal course of portfolio management which includes rebalancing its existing portfolios of assets and liabilities. In addition, various derivative financial instruments are used to modify the interest rate risk exposures of certain assets and liabilities. These strategies include the use of interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and floors, options, futures, forwards and commitments to purchase securities. These instruments are generally used to lock interest rates or market values, to shorten or lengthen durations of fixed maturity securities or investment contracts, or to hedge (on an economic basis) interest rate risks associated with investments and variable rate debt.

The Company has exposure to equity price risk as a result of its investment in equity securities and equity derivatives. Equity price risk results from changes in the level or volatility of equity prices, which affect the value of equity securities, or instruments that derive their value from such securities. The Company attempts to mitigate its exposure to such risks by limiting its investment in any one security or index. The Company may also manage this risk by utilizing instruments such as options, swaps, futures and collars to protect appreciation in securities held.

The Company has exposure to credit risk arising from the uncertainty associated with a financial instrument obligor’s ability to make timely principal and/or interest payments. The Company attempts to mitigate this risk by limiting credit concentrations, practicing diversification and frequently monitoring the credit quality of issuers and counterparties. In addition, the Company may utilize credit derivatives such as credit default swaps (CDS) to modify the credit risk inherent in certain investments. CDS involve a transfer of credit risk from one party to another in exchange for periodic payments.

Foreign currency risk arises from the possibility that changes in foreign currency exchange rates will impact the fair value of financial instruments denominated in a foreign currency. The Company’s foreign transactions are primarily denominated in British pounds, Euros and Canadian dollars. The Company typically manages this risk via asset/liability currency matching and through the use of foreign currency forwards.

In addition to the derivatives used for risk management purposes described above, the Company may also use derivatives for purposes of income enhancement. Income enhancement transactions are entered into with the intention of providing additional income or yield to a particular portfolio segment or instrument. Income enhancement transactions are limited in scope and primarily involve the sale of covered options in which the Company receives a premium in exchange for selling a call or put option.

The Company will also use CDS to sell credit protection against a specified credit event. In selling credit protection, CDS are used to replicate fixed income securities when credit exposure to certain issuers is not available or when it is economically beneficial to transact in the derivative market compared to the cash market alternative. Credit risk includes both the default event risk and market value exposure due to fluctuations in credit spreads. In selling CDS protection, the Company receives a periodic premium in exchange for providing credit protection on a single name reference obligation or a credit derivative index. If there is an event of default as defined by the CDS agreement, the Company is required to pay the counterparty the referenced

notional amount of the CDS contract and in exchange, the Company is entitled to receive the referenced defaulted security or the cash equivalent.

The tables below summarize open CDS contracts where the Company sold credit protection as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The fair value of the contracts represents the amounts that the Company would receive or pay at those dates to exit the derivative positions. The maximum amount of future payments assumes no residual value in the defaulted securities that the Company would receive as part of the contract terminations and is equal to the notional value of the CDS contracts.

Credit Ratings of Underlying Reference Obligations


	Fair Value of		Maximum Amount of		Weighted
September 30, 2010	Credit Default		Future Payments under		Average Years
(In millions)	Swaps		Credit Default Swaps		to Maturity
BB-rated	$	—	$	5		2.7
B-rated		—		3		1.7

Total	$	—	$	8		2.4

Credit Ratings of Underlying Reference Obligations


	Fair Value of		Maximum Amount of		Weighted
December 31, 2009	Credit Default		Future Payments under		Average Years
(In millions)	Swaps		Credit Default Swaps		to Maturity
B-rated	$	—	$	8		3.1

Total	$	—	$	8		3.1

Credit exposure associated with non-performance by the counterparties to derivative instruments is generally limited to the uncollateralized fair value of the asset related to the instruments recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company attempts to mitigate the risk of non-performance by monitoring the creditworthiness of counterparties and diversifying derivatives to multiple counterparties. The Company generally requires that all over-the-counter derivative contracts be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement, and exchanges collateral under the terms of these agreements with its derivative investment counterparties depending on the amount of the exposure and the credit rating of the counterparty. The Company does not offset its net derivative positions against the fair value of the collateral provided. The fair value of cash collateral provided by the Company was $2 million and $7 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The fair value of cash collateral received from counterparties was $1 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

Derivative securities are recorded at fair value. See Note F for information regarding the fair value of derivatives securities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not held in a trading portfolio are reported in Net realized investment gains (losses) on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in the fair value of derivatives held for trading purposes are reported in Net investment income on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

A summary of the recognized gains (losses) related to derivative financial instruments follows.


Recognized Gains (Losses)

Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Without hedge designation
Interest rate swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	61
Credit default swaps — purchased protection		(1	)		(11	)		(1	)		(46	)
Credit default swaps — sold protection		—			—			—			2
Total return swaps		—			—			—			(2	)
Futures sold, not yet purchased		—			(2	)		—			21
Options written		—			—			—			15

Total without hedge designation		(1	)		(13	)		(1	)		51

Trading activities
Futures sold, not yet purchased		(4	)		(4	)		(3	)		(5	)


Total	$	(5	)	$	(17	)	$	(4	)	$	46

A summary of the aggregate contractual or notional amounts and gross estimated fair values related to derivative financial instruments reported as Other invested assets or Other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets follows. The contractual or notional amounts for derivatives are used to calculate the exchange of contractual payments under the agreements and may not be representative of the potential for gain or loss on these instruments.


Derivative Financial Instruments
	Contractual/
September 30, 2010	Notional		Estimated Fair Value
(In millions)	Amount		Asset		(Liability)
Without hedge designation
Credit default swaps — purchased protection	$	25	$	—	$	(3	)
Credit default swaps — sold protection		8		—		—
Currency forwards		5		—		—
Equity warrants		3		—		—

Total without hedge designation		41		—		(3	)

Trading activities
Futures sold, not yet purchased		28		—		—


Total	$	69	$	—	$	(3	)


Derivative Financial Instruments
	Contractual/
December 31, 2009	Notional		Estimated Fair Value
(In millions)	Amount		Asset		(Liability)
Without hedge designation
Credit default swaps — purchased protection	$	116	$	—	$	(11	)
Credit default swaps — sold protection		8		—		—
Equity warrants		2		—		—

Total without hedge designation		126		—		(11	)

Trading activities
Futures sold, not yet purchased		132		—		—


Total	$	258	$	—	$	(11	)

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, new derivative transactions entered into totaled approximately $0.9 billion and $2.1 billion in notional value while derivative termination activity totaled approximately $0.9 billion and $2.3 billion. This activity was primarily attributable to interest rate futures and forward commitments for mortgage-backed securities. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, new derivative transactions entered into totaled approximately $8 billion and $18 billion in notional value while derivative termination activity totaled approximately $8 billion and $19 billion. This activity was primarily attributable to interest rate futures, interest rate options and interest rate swaps.

Note F. Fair Value

Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable.

Level 1 — Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.

Level 3 — Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are not observable.

The Company attempts to establish fair value as an exit price in an orderly transaction consistent with normal settlement market conventions. The Company is responsible for the valuation process and seeks to obtain quoted market prices for all securities. When quoted market prices in active markets are not available, the Company uses a number of methodologies to establish fair value estimates including: discounted cash flow models, prices from recently executed transactions of similar securities, or broker/dealer quotes, utilizing market observable information to the extent possible. In conjunction with modeling activities, the Company may use external data as inputs. The modeled inputs are consistent with observable market information, when available, or with the Company’s assumptions as to what market participants would use to value the securities. The Company also uses pricing services as a significant source of data. The Company monitors all the pricing inputs to determine if the markets from which the data is gathered are active. As further validation of the Company’s valuation process, the Company samples past fair value estimates and compares the valuations to actual transactions executed in the market on similar dates.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.


								Total
September 30, 2010								Assets/(Liabilities)
(In millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			at Fair Value
Assets
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government agencies	$	113	$	60	$	—		$	173

Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed		—		5,330		646			5,976
Commercial mortgage-backed		—		923		78			1,001
Other asset-backed		—		419		246			665

Total asset-backed		—		6,672		970			7,642

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		—		7,550		458			8,008
Foreign government		115		500		—			615
Corporate and other bonds		—		21,555		600			22,155
Redeemable preferred stock		3		49		1			53

Total fixed maturity securities		231		36,386		2,029			38,646

Equity securities		376		133		22			531
Derivative and other financial instruments, included in Other invested assets		—		—		28			28
Short term investments		1,237		845		2			2,084
Life settlement contracts, included in Other assets		—		—		136			136
Discontinued operations investments, included in Other liabilities		7		66		—			73
Separate account business		36		385		41			462

Total assets	$	1,887	$	37,815	$	2,258		$	41,960


Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments, included in Other liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	(3	)	$	(3	)

Total liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	(3	)	$	(3	)


								Total
December 31, 2009								Assets/(Liabilities)
(In millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			at Fair Value
Assets
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government agencies	$	247	$	54	$	—		$	301

Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed		—		6,308		629			6,937
Commercial mortgage-backed		—		461		123			584
Other asset-backed		—		484		348			832

Total asset-backed		—		7,253		1,100			8,353

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		—		6,424		756			7,180
Foreign government		139		340		—			479
Corporate and other bonds		—		18,636		609			19,245
Redeemable preferred stock		3		49		2			54

Total fixed maturity securities		389		32,756		2,467			35,612

Equity securities		503		130		11			644
Short term investments		3,552		397		—			3,949
Life settlement contracts, included in Other assets		—		—		130			130
Discontinued operations investments, included in Other liabilities		19		106		16			141
Separate account business		43		342		38			423

Total assets	$	4,506	$	33,731	$	2,662		$	40,899


Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments, included in Other liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	(11	)	$	(11	)

Total liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	(11	)	$	(11	)

The tables below present a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.


				Net realized
				investment
				gains (losses)			Net change in													Unrealized gains
				and net			unrealized													(losses) on
				change in			appreciation													Level 3 assets
				unrealized			(depreciation)			Purchases,										and liabilities
				appreciation			included in			sales,										held at
				(depreciation)			other			issuances			Transfers		Transfers			Balance at		September 30,
	Balance at			included in			comprehensive			and			into		out of			September 30,		2010 recognized
Level 3	July 1, 2010			net loss*			income			settlements			Level 3		Level 3			2010		in net loss*
(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities:
Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed	$	659		$	1		$	(9	)	$	(5	)	$	—	$	—		$	646	$	—
Commercial mortgage-backed		95			—			3			—			—		(20	)		78		—
Other asset-backed		306			(1	)		7			(66	)		—		—			246		—

Total asset-backed		1,060			—			1			(71	)		—		(20	)		970		—

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		539			—			3			(84	)		—		—			458		—
Corporate and other bonds		718			1			18			(83	)		—		(54	)		600		(1	)
Redeemable preferred stock		1			—			—			—			—		—			1		—

Total fixed maturity securities		2,318			1			22			(238	)		—		(74	)		2,029		(1	)

Equity securities		4			(3	)		—			15			6		—			22		(4	)
Derivative and other financial instruments, net		(2	)		2			—			25			—		—			25		2
Short term investments		11			—			—			2			—		(11	)		2		—
Life settlement contracts		134			8			—			(6	)		—		—			136		4
Separate account business		37			—			—			4			—		—			41		—

Total	$	2,502		$	8		$	22		$	(198	)	$	6	$	(85	)	$	2,255	$	1


				Net realized
				investment
				gains (losses)																Unrealized
				and net			Net change in													gains (losses) on
				change in			unrealized													Level 3 assets
				unrealized			appreciation		Purchases,											and liabilities
				appreciation			(depreciation)		sales,											held at
				(depreciation)			included in other		issuances			Transfers		Transfers			Balance at			September 30,
	Balance at			included in			comprehensive		and			into		out of			September 30,			2009 recognized
Level 3	July 1, 2009			net income*			income		settlements			Level 3		Level 3			2009			in net income*
(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities:

Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed	$	808		$	1		$	62	$	20		$	—	$	(154	)	$	737		$	(1	)
Commercial mortgage-backed		175			(3	)		28		11			—		—			211			(3	)
Other asset-backed		141			1			14		132			—		—			288			—

Total asset-backed		1,124			(1	)		104		163			—		(154	)		1,236			(4	)

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		785			—			19		(34	)		—		—			770			—
Corporate and other bonds		730			(10	)		67		63			5		(83	)		772			(10	)
Redeemable preferred stock		1			—			1		—			—		—			2			—

Total fixed maturity securities		2,640			(11	)		191		192			5		(237	)		2,780			(14	)

Equity securities		209			—			—		—			—		(199	)		10			—
Derivative financial instruments, net		(10	)		(10	)		—		10			—		—			(10	)		(4	)
Short term investments		—			—			1		7			—		—			8			—
Life settlement contracts		126			8			—		(5	)		—		—			129			5
Discontinued operations investments		13			—			3		—			—		—			16			—
Separate account business		38			—			—		3			—		(1	)		40			—

Total	$	3,016		$	(13	)	$	195	$	207		$	5	$	(437	)	$	2,973		$	(13	)

The tables below present a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.


				Net realized
				investment
				gains (losses)			Net change in												Unrealized gains
				and net			unrealized												(losses) on
				change in			appreciation												Level 3 assets
				unrealized			(depreciation)		Purchases,										and liabilities
				appreciation			included in		sales,										held at
	Balance at			(depreciation)			other		issuances			Transfers		Transfers			Balance at		September 30,
	January 1,			included in			comprehensive		and			into		out of			September 30,		2010 recognized
Level 3	2010			net loss*			income		settlements			Level 3		Level 3			2010		in net income*
(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities:
Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed	$	629		$	(7	)	$	20	$	50		$	—	$	(46	)	$	646	$	(10	)
Commercial mortgage-backed		123			(1	)		1		6			7		(58	)		78		(2	)
Other asset-backed		348			3			29		(89	)		—		(45	)		246		(1	)

Total asset-backed		1,100			(5	)		50		(33	)		7		(149	)		970		(13	)

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		756			—			9		(307	)		—		—			458		—
Corporate and other bonds		609			10			56		29			23		(127	)		600		(2	)
Redeemable preferred stock		2			6			—		(7	)		—		—			1		—

Total fixed maturity securities		2,467			11			115		(318	)		30		(276	)		2,029		(15	)

Equity securities		11			(4	)		—		14			8		(7	)		22		(5	)
Derivative and other financial instruments, net		(11	)		1			—		35			—		—			25		2
Short term investments		—			—			—		12			1		(11	)		2		—
Life settlement contracts		130			25			—		(19	)		—		—			136		11
Discontinued operations investments		16			—			1		(2	)		—		(15	)		—		—
Separate account business		38			—			—		3			—		—			41		—

Total	$	2,651		$	33		$	116	$	(275	)	$	39	$	(309	)	$	2,255	$	(7	)


				Net realized
				investment
				gains (losses)			Net change in														Unrealized gains
				and net			unrealized														(losses) on
				change in			appreciation														Level 3 assets
				unrealized			(depreciation)			Purchases,											and liabilities
				appreciation			included in			sales,											held at
	Balance at			(depreciation)			other			issuances			Transfers		Transfers			Balance at			September 30,
	January 1,			included in			comprehensive			and			into		out of			September 30,			2009 recognized
Level 3	2009			net income*			income			settlements			Level 3		Level 3			2009			in net income*
(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities:
Asset-backed:
Residential mortgage-backed	$	782		$	(22	)	$	98		$	(28	)	$	71	$	(164	)	$	737		$	(13	)
Commercial mortgage-backed		186			(168	)		170			(3	)		26		—			211			(166	)
Other asset-backed		139			(29	)		54			90			153		(119	)		288			(31	)

Total asset-backed		1,107			(219	)		322			59			250		(283	)		1,236			(210	)

States, municipalities and political subdivisions		750			—			74			(54	)		—		—			770			—
Foreign government		6			—			—			—			—		(6	)		—			—
Corporate and other bonds		616			(15	)		113			130			23		(95	)		772			(15	)
Redeemable preferred stock		13			(9	)		9			7			—		(18	)		2			(9	)

Total fixed maturity securities		2,492			(243	)		518			142			273		(402	)		2,780			(234	)

Equity securities		210			—			(1	)		—			—		(199	)		10			—
Derivative financial instruments, net		(87	)		15			—			62			—		—			(10	)		(11	)
Short term investments		—			—			1			7			—		—			8			—
Life settlement contracts		129			24			—			(24	)		—		—			129			7
Discontinued operations investments		15			—			3			(2	)		—		—			16			—
Separate account business		38			—			—			3			—		(1	)		40			—

Total	$	2,797		$	(204	)	$	521		$	188		$	273	$	(602	)	$	2,973		$	(238	)

* Net realized and unrealized gains and losses shown above are reported in Net income (loss) as follows:


Major Category of Assets and Liabilities		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Line Items

Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale		Net realized investment gains (losses)

Fixed maturity securities trading		Net investment income

Equity securities		Net realized investment gains (losses)

Derivative financial instruments held in a trading portfolio		Net investment income

Derivative financial instruments not held in a trading portfolio and fair value option financial instruments		Net realized investment gains (losses)

Life settlement contracts		Other revenues

Securities shown in the Level 3 tables on the previous pages may be transferred in or out based on the availability of observable market information used to verify pricing sources or used in pricing models. The availability of observable market information varies based on market conditions and trading volume and may cause securities to move in and out of Level 3 from reporting period to reporting period. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels at the beginning of the reporting period.

The following section describes the valuation methodologies used to measure different financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the instrument is generally classified.

Fixed Maturity Securities

Level 1 securities include highly liquid government bonds within the U.S. Treasury securities category and securities issued by foreign governments for which quoted market prices are available. The remaining fixed maturity securities are valued using pricing for similar securities, recently executed transactions, cash flow models with yield curves, broker/dealer quotes and other pricing models utilizing observable inputs. The valuation for most fixed maturity securities is classified as Level 2. Securities within Level 2 include certain corporate bonds, states, municipalities and political subdivisions securities, foreign provincial and local government bonds, asset-backed securities, mortgage-backed pass-through securities and redeemable preferred stock. Level 2 securities may also include securities that have firm sale commitments and prices that are not recorded until the settlement date. Securities are generally assigned to Level 3 in cases where broker/dealer quotes are significant inputs to the valuation and there is a lack of transparency as to whether these quotes are based on information that is observable in the marketplace. These securities include certain corporate bonds, asset-backed securities, states, municipalities and political subdivisions securities and redeemable preferred stock. Within corporate bonds and states, municipalities and political subdivisions securities, Level 3 securities also include tax-exempt and taxable auction rate certificates. Fair value of auction rate securities is determined utilizing a pricing model with three primary inputs. The interest rate and spread inputs are observable from like instruments while the maturity date assumption is unobservable due to the uncertain nature of the principal prepayments prior to maturity.

Equity Securities

Level 1 securities include publicly traded securities valued using quoted market prices. Level 2 securities are primarily non-redeemable preferred stocks and common stocks valued using pricing for similar securities, recently executed transactions, broker/dealer quotes and other pricing models utilizing observable inputs. Level 3 securities include equity securities that are priced using internal models with inputs that are not market observable.

Derivative and Other Financial Instruments

Exchange traded derivatives, primarily futures, are valued using quoted market prices and are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 2 derivatives primarily include currency forwards valued using observable market forward rates. Over-the-counter derivatives, principally interest rate swaps, total return swaps, credit default swaps, equity warrants and options, are valued using inputs including broker/dealer quotes and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy due to a lack of transparency as to whether these quotes are based on information that is observable in the marketplace. Other financial instruments consist of

Level 3 securities which contain embedded derivatives for which the fair value option has been elected and are priced using either broker/dealer quotes or internal models with inputs that are not market observable.

Short Term Investments

The valuation of securities that are actively traded or have quoted prices are classified as Level 1. These securities include money market funds and treasury bills. Level 2 primarily includes commercial paper, for which all inputs are observable. Level 3 securities include bank debt securities purchased within one year of maturity where broker/dealer quotes are significant inputs to the valuation and there is a lack of transparency to the market inputs used.

Life Settlement Contracts

The fair values of life settlement contracts are determined as the present value of the anticipated death benefits less anticipated premium payments based on contract terms that are distinct for each insured, as well as the Company’s own assumptions for mortality, premium expense, and the rate of return that a buyer would require on the contracts, as no comparable market pricing data is available.

Discontinued Operations Investments

Assets relating to the Company’s discontinued operations include fixed maturity securities and short term investments. The valuation methodologies for these asset types have been described above.

Separate Account Business

Separate account business includes fixed maturity securities, equities and short term investments. The valuation methodologies for these asset types have been described above.

Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instrument assets and liabilities which are not measured at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are listed in the table below.


	September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
(In millions)	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets
Notes receivable for the issuance of common stock	$	30	$	29	$	30	$	29
Mortgage loans		70		71		—		—

Financial liabilities
Premium deposits and annuity contracts	$	100	$	105	$	105	$	106
Short term debt		400		415		—		—
Long term debt		2,251		2,426		2,303		2,290

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of these financial assets and liabilities.

The fair values of notes receivable for the issuance of common stock were estimated using discounted cash flows utilizing interest rates currently offered for obligations securitized with similar collateral.

The fair value of mortgage loans is based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the current interest rate for origination of similar quality loans.

Premium deposits and annuity contracts were valued based on cash surrender values, estimated fair values or policyholder liabilities, net of amounts ceded related to sold business.

The Company’s senior notes and debentures were valued based on quoted market prices. The fair value for other debt was estimated using discounted cash flows based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar borrowing arrangements.

The carrying amounts reported on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for Cash, Accrued investment income and certain other assets and other liabilities approximate fair value due to the short term nature of these items. These assets and liabilities are not listed in the table above.

Note G. Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

The Company’s property and casualty insurance claim and claim adjustment expense reserves represent the estimated amounts necessary to resolve all outstanding claims, including claims that are incurred but not reported (IBNR) as of the reporting date. The Company’s reserve projections are based primarily on detailed analysis of the facts in each case, the Company’s experience with similar cases and various historical development patterns. Consideration is given to such historical patterns as field reserving trends and claims settlement practices, loss payments, pending levels of unpaid claims and product mix, as well as court decisions, economic conditions and public attitudes. All of these factors can affect the estimation of claim and claim adjustment expense reserves.

Establishing claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, including claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for catastrophic events that have occurred, is an estimation process. Many factors can ultimately affect the final settlement of a claim and, therefore, the necessary reserve. Changes in the law, results of litigation, medical costs, the cost of repair materials and labor rates can all affect ultimate claim costs. In addition, time can be a critical part of reserving determinations since the longer the span between the incidence of a loss and the payment or settlement of the claim, the more variable the ultimate settlement amount can be. Accordingly, short-tail claims, such as property damage claims, tend to be more reasonably estimable than long-tail claims, such as workers’ compensation, general liability and professional liability claims. Adjustments to prior year reserve estimates, if necessary, are reflected in the results of operations in the period that the need for such adjustments is determined.

Catastrophes are an inherent risk of the property and casualty insurance business and have contributed to material period-to-period fluctuations in the Company’s results of operations and/or equity. The Company reported catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, of $12 million and $100 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. Catastrophe losses in 2010 related primarily to wind and thunderstorms. The Company reported catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, of $23 million and $79 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. There can be no assurance that the Company’s ultimate cost for catastrophes will not exceed current estimates.

The following provides discussion of the Company’s Asbestos and Environmental Pollution (A&EP) reserves.

A&EP Reserves

On August 31, 2010, CCC together with several of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries completed a transaction with National Indemnity Company (NICO), a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., under which substantially all of the Company’s legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to NICO.

Under the terms of the NICO transaction, effective January 1, 2010 the Company ceded approximately $1.6 billion of net A&EP claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves to NICO under a retroactive reinsurance agreement with an aggregate limit of $4 billion (Loss Portfolio Transfer). Included in the $1.6 billion of net A&EP claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves was approximately $90 million of net claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves relating to the Company’s discontinued operations. The $1.6 billion of claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves ceded to NICO is net of $1.2 billion of ceded claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves under existing third party reinsurance contracts. The NICO aggregate reinsurance limit also covers credit risk on the existing third party reinsurance related to these liabilities. However, unallocated claim adjustment expenses are not subject to the aggregate reinsurance limit.

The Company paid NICO a reinsurance premium of $2 billion and transferred to NICO billed third party reinsurance receivables related to A&EP claims with a net book value of $215 million. As of August 31, 2010, NICO deposited approximately $2.2 billion in a collateral trust account as security for its obligations to the Company. This $2.2 billion will be reduced by the amount of net A&EP claim and allocated claim adjustment expense payments. In addition, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. guaranteed the payment obligations of NICO up to the full aggregate reinsurance limit as well as certain of NICO’s performance obligations under the trust agreement. NICO is responsible for claims handling and billing and collection from third party reinsurers related to the Company’s A&EP claims.

The following table displays the impact of the Loss Portfolio Transfer on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Impact on Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations


(In millions)	2010
Other operating expenses	$	529
Income tax benefit		185


Loss from continuing operations, included in the Corporate & Other Non-Core segment		(344	)
Loss from discontinued operations		(21	)


Net loss attributable to CNA	$	(365	)

In connection with the transfer of billed third party reinsurance receivables related to A&EP claims and the coverage of credit risk afforded under the terms of the Loss Portfolio Transfer, the Company reduced its allowance for uncollectible reinsurance receivables on billed third party reinsurance receivables and ceded claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves by $200 million. This reduction is reflected in Other operating expenses presented above.

At September 30, 2010, the gross A&EP claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves were $2.5 billion, which were ceded under the Loss Portfolio Transfer and other existing third party reinsurance agreements. At September 30, 2010, the remaining amount available under the $4 billion aggregate limit of the Loss Portfolio Transfer was $2.4 billion on an incurred basis. The net ultimate losses paid under the Loss Portfolio Transfer were $172 million through September 30, 2010.

The Loss Portfolio Transfer is considered a retroactive reinsurance contract. In the event that the cumulative claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses ceded under the Loss Portfolio Transfer exceed the consideration paid, the resulting gain from such excess would be deferred. A cumulative amortization adjustment would be recognized in earnings in the period such excess arises so that the resulting deferred gain

would reflect the balance that would have existed if the revised estimate was available at the inception date of the Loss Portfolio Transfer.

Net Prior Year Development

The following tables and discussion include the net prior year development recorded for CNA Specialty, CNA Commercial and Corporate & Other Non-Core. Unfavorable net prior year development of $26 million was recorded in the Life & Group Non-Core segment for the three months ended September 30, 2010. There was no net prior year development recorded in the Life & Group Non-Core segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 for the Life & Group Non-Core segment, favorable net prior year development of $81 million and $75 million was recorded. These amounts included the impact of a settlement reached in September 2009 with Willis Limited that resolved litigation related to the placement of personal accident reinsurance. Under the settlement agreement, Willis Limited agreed to pay the Company a total of $130 million, which was reported as a loss recovery of $94 million, net of reinsurance.

Three Month Comparison

Net Prior Year Development
Three months ended September 30, 2010


	CNA			CNA			Corporate & Other
(In millions)	Specialty			Commercial			Non-Core		Total
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development:

Core (Non-A&EP)	$	(65	)	$	(26	)	$	2	$	(89	)
A&EP		—			—			—		—


Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development before impact of premium development		(65	)		(26	)		2		(89	)


Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development		(2	)		(2	)		—		(4	)

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development	$	(67	)	$	(28	)	$	2	$	(93	)

Net Prior Year Development
Three months ended September 30, 2009


	CNA			CNA			Corporate & Other
(In millions)	Specialty			Commercial			Non-Core		Total
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development:

Core (Non-A&EP)	$	(39	)	$	(21	)	$	1	$	(59	)
A&EP		—			—			—		—


Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development before impact of premium development		(39	)		(21	)		1		(59	)


Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development		3			9			—		12

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development	$	(36	)	$	(12	)	$	1	$	(47	)

2010 Net Prior Year Development

CNA Specialty

The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to surety and professional liability coverages.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $38 million was recorded for surety coverages primarily due to a decrease in the estimated loss on a large national contractor in accident year 2005 and lower than expected claim emergence in accident years 2007 and prior.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $27 million was recorded for directors & officers and errors & omissions coverages for large firms. This favorable development was primarily the result of reviews of large claims in accident years 2007 and prior.

Both favorable and unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was recorded for medical professional liability coverages. Favorable development was recorded in nursing home liability business, primarily in accident years 2007 and prior due to favorable incurred emergence. Unfavorable development was recorded for products liability coverage in accident years 2008 and 2009 due to increased frequency of large losses related to medical products.

Both favorable and unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development occurred in professional liability lines primarily related to errors & omission and employment practice liability coverages. The favorable development primarily related to accident years 2007 and prior and was the result of decreased severity and a decrease in excess loss expectations. The unfavorable development in accident years 2008 and 2009 was driven by the economic recession and higher unemployment.

CNA Commercial

The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to favorable experience in general liability, umbrella, property and marine coverages, partially offset by unfavorable experience in workers’ compensation.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $70 million was recorded for general liability and umbrella coverages primarily due to better than expected loss emergence in accident years 2006 and prior.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $28 million was recorded for property and marine coverages in the Company’s international commercial book due to lower than expected frequency of large claims primarily in accident year 2009.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $23 million was recorded for marine business. This development was primarily the result of decreased claim frequency, favorable salvage recoveries in accident year 2008 for cargo business and lower severity for excess liability in accident years 2005 and prior.

Unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $60 million was recorded for excess workers’ compensation primarily due to increased frequency in accident years 2004 and prior.

Unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $42 million was related to increased severity of indemnity losses relative to expectations on workers’ compensation claims related to Defense Base Act contractors primarily in accident years 2008 and prior.

2009 Net Prior Year Development

CNA Specialty

The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to favorable experience in professional liability, directors & officers and surety business.

Approximately $20 million of favorable development was recorded for professional liability coverages driven by lower than expected large claim frequency, primarily related to accountants and lawyers in accident years 2004 through 2006. Approximately $11 million of favorable development was primarily related to directors & officers coverages in accident years 2003 through 2006. This favorable development related primarily to lower than expected large claim frequency. An additional $7 million of favorable development was recorded for surety business primarily in accident years 2004, due to claims closing favorable to expectations, and 2006, due to lower than expected claim frequency.

CNA Commercial

The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to favorable experience in general liability, partially offset by unfavorable experience in workers’ compensation.

Approximately $56 million of favorable development was primarily due to claims closing favorable to expectations on non-construction defect general liability exposures in accident years 2003 and prior.

Approximately $47 million of unfavorable development was due to increased paid and incurred severity on worker’s compensation business, primarily in accident years 2004, 2007 and 2008 on small and middle market business.

Nine Month Comparison

Net Prior Year Development
Nine months ended September 30, 2010


	CNA			CNA			Corporate & Other
(In millions)	Specialty			Commercial			Non-Core			Total
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development:

Core (Non-A&EP)	$	(215	)	$	(229	)	$	5		$	(439	)
A&EP		—			—			—			—


Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development before impact of premium development		(215	)		(229	)		5			(439	)


Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development		(5	)		54			(3	)		46

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development	$	(220	)	$	(175	)	$	2		$	(393	)

Net Prior Year Development Nine months ended September 30, 2009

	CNA			CNA			Corporate & Other
(In millions)	Specialty			Commercial			Non-Core			Total
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development:

Core (Non-A&EP)	$	(103	)	$	(148	)	$	6		$	(245	)
A&EP		—			—			—			—


Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development before impact of premium development		(103	)		(148	)		6			(245	)


Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development		—			85			(3	)		82


Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development	$	(103	)	$	(63	)	$	3		$	(163	)

2010 Net Prior Year Development

CNA Specialty

The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to professional liability and surety coverages.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $164 million was recorded for errors & omissions and directors & officers’ coverages due to several factors, including reduced frequency of large claims, primarily in accident years 2007 and prior, and the result of reviews of large claims in accident years 2007 and prior.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $52 million was recorded for medical professional liability coverages. Favorable development was primarily due to favorable incurred emergence, primarily in accident years 2007 and prior. Unfavorable development in accident years 2008 and 2009 was due to increased frequency of large losses related to medical products.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $49 million was recorded for surety coverages primarily due to a decrease in the estimated loss on a large national contractor in accident year 2005 and lower than expected claim emergence in accident years 2007 and prior.

Unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $66 million was recorded for employment practices liability and errors & omissions coverages. The unfavorable development in accident years 2008 and 2009 was driven by the economic recession and higher unemployment.

CNA Commercial

The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to favorable experience in property, general liability, umbrella, auto and international casualty coverages.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $109 million was recorded for property coverages. Favorable development of $53 million was due to favorable incurred loss emergence, primarily in accident years 2008 and 2009 related to catastrophes. Additional favorable development of approximately $56 million was due to decreased severity in accident years 2009 and prior related to non-catastrophes.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $79 million was recorded for international commercial coverages. Approximately $32 million of favorable development was recorded due to decreased frequency across several lines within the Company’s Hawaiian affiliate, primarily in accident years 2008 and prior. Approximately $23 million of favorable development was primarily due to a commutation within the European affiliate’s book of renewable energy business. Approximately $26 million of favorable development was recorded for property and marine coverages in the Company’s international commercial book due to lower than expected frequency of large claims primarily in accident year 2009.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $78 million was recorded for general liability and umbrella coverages primarily due to better than expected loss emergence in accident years 2006 and prior.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $62 million was recorded for commercial auto coverages primarily due to decreased frequency and severity trends in accident years 2009 and prior.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $25 million was recorded for marine business. This development was primarily the result of decreased claim frequency, favorable salvage recoveries in recent accident years and lower severity for excess liability in accident years 2005 and prior.

Unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $44 million was related to increased severity of indemnity losses relative to expectations on workers’ compensation claims related to Defense Base Act contractors primarily in accident years 2008 and prior.

Unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $35 million was due to increased claim frequency in a portion of the Company’s primary casualty surplus lines book in accident years 2008 and 2009.

Unfavorable premium development of approximately $54 million was recorded due to a change in ultimate premium estimates relating to retrospectively rated policies and return premium on auditable policies due to reduced exposures.

2009 Net Prior Year Development

CNA Specialty

The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to favorable experience in medical professional liability, professional liability, directors & officers and surety business.

Favorable development of approximately $25 million for medical professional liability was primarily due to better than expected frequency and severity in accident years 2005 and prior, including claims closing favorable to expectations. Additional favorable development of $35 million was recorded for professional liability coverages. This favorable experience was related to several items, including favorable experience on a number of large claims related to financial institutions in accident years 2003 and prior, decreased frequency of large claims in accident years 2007 and prior related to financial institutions, and lower than expected large claim frequency related to accountants and lawyers in accident years 2004 through 2006. Approximately $30 million of favorable development was primarily related to directors & officers coverages in accident years 2003 through 2006. This favorable development related primarily to lower than expected large claim frequency. An additional $7 million of favorable development was recorded for surety business primarily in accident years 2004, due to claims closing favorable to expectations, and 2006, due to lower than expected claim frequency. An additional $4 million of favorable development was a result of favorable outcomes on claims relating to catastrophes in accident year 2005.

CNA Commercial

The favorable net prior year development was primarily due to favorable experience in property and general liability, partially offset by unfavorable experience in workers’ compensation.

Favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development of approximately $81 million was primarily due to experience in property coverages. Prior year catastrophe reserves decreased approximately $64 million, driven by the favorable settlement of several claims primarily in accident years 2005 and 2007, and better than expected frequency and severity on claims relating to catastrophes in accident year 2008. An additional $17 million of favorable development was due to non-catastrophe related favorable loss emergence on large property coverages, primarily in accident years 2007 and 2008. Additional favorable development of approximately $81 million was related to general liability exposures. Of this, $25 million was due to decreased frequency and severity trends related to construction defect exposures in accident years 2003 and prior. The remaining favorable development was primarily due to claims closing favorable to expectations on non-construction defect general liability exposures in accident years 2003 and prior.

Approximately $51 million of unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was due to increased paid and incurred severity on workers’ compensation business primarily in accident years 2004, 2007 and 2008 on small and middle markets business.

Approximately $40 million of unfavorable premium development was related to changes in estimated ultimate premium on retrospectively rated coverages. Additional unfavorable premium development was due to an estimated liability for an assessment related to a reinsurance association and less premium processing on auditable policies than expected.

Note H . Legal Proceedings and Contingent Liabilities

Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation

In August 2005, CNAF and certain insurance subsidiaries were joined as defendants, along with other insurers and brokers, in multidistrict litigation pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation , Civil No. 04-5184 (GEB). The plaintiffs’ consolidated class action complaint alleges bid rigging and improprieties in the payment of contingent commissions in connection with the sale of insurance that violated federal and state antitrust laws, the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act and state common law. After discovery, the District Court dismissed the federal antitrust claims and the RICO claims, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. The plaintiffs appealed the dismissal of their complaint to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. In August 2010, the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the antitrust claims and the RICO claims against CNAF and certain insurance subsidiaries, but vacated the dismissal of those claims against other parties. The Court of Appeals also vacated and remanded the dismissal of the state law claims against CNAF and certain insurance subsidiaries and other parties to allow for further proceedings before the District Court. The District Court has ordered that the briefing on any further motions to dismiss the remanded claims be completed in November 2010. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to this action and intends to defend the case vigorously.

The extent of losses beyond any amounts that may be accrued are not readily determinable at this time. However, based on facts and circumstances presently known, in the opinion of management, an unfavorable outcome will not materially affect the equity of the Company, although results of operations may be adversely affected.

Other Litigation

The Company is also a party to other litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on the facts and circumstances currently known, such other litigation will not, in the opinion of management, materially affect the equity or results of operations of the Company.

Note I. Benefit Plans

The components of net periodic cost (benefit) are presented in the following table.

Net Periodic Cost (Benefit)


Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Pension cost
Service cost	$	5		$	4		$	13		$	12
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		38			38			112			115
Expected return on plan assets		(41	)		(37	)		(122	)		(109	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		6			7			18			19


Net periodic pension cost	$	8		$	12		$	21		$	37


Postretirement benefit
Service cost	$	—		$	—		$	1		$	1
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		2			3			6			7
Amortization of prior service cost		(4	)		(4	)		(12	)		(12	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		—			—			1			—


Net periodic postretirement benefit	$	(2	)	$	(1	)	$	(4	)	$	(4	)

Note J. Commitments, Contingencies, and Guarantees

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company holds an investment in a real estate joint venture. In the normal course of business, the Company, on a joint and several basis with other unrelated insurance company shareholders, has committed to continue funding the operating deficits of this joint venture. Additionally, the Company and the other unrelated shareholders, on a joint and several basis, have guaranteed an operating lease for an office building, which expires in 2016. The guarantee of the operating lease is a parallel guarantee to the commitment to fund operating deficits; consequently, the separate guarantee to the lessor is not expected to be triggered as long as the joint venture continues to be funded by its shareholders which provide liquidity to make its annual lease payments.

In the event that the other parties to the joint venture are unable to meet their commitments in funding the operations of this joint venture, the Company would be required to assume the obligation for the entire office building operating lease. The Company does not believe it is likely that it will be required to do so. However, the maximum potential future lease payments and other related costs at September 30, 2010 that the Company could be required to pay under this guarantee are approximately $195 million. If the Company were required to assume the entire lease obligation, the Company would have the right to pursue reimbursement from the other shareholders and the right to all sublease revenues.

The Company has entered into a limited number of contracts that guarantee minimum payments, primarily related to outsourced services and software. Estimated future minimum payments under these contracts, which amounted to approximately $13 million at September 30, 2010, are $9 million in 2010, $3 million in 2011 and $1 million in 2012.

Guarantees

In the course of selling business entities and assets to third parties, the Company has agreed to indemnify purchasers for losses arising out of breaches of representation and warranties with respect to the business entities or assets being sold, including, in certain cases, losses arising from undisclosed liabilities or certain named litigation. Such indemnification provisions generally survive for periods ranging from nine months following the applicable closing date to the expiration of the relevant statutes of limitation. As of September 30, 2010, the aggregate amount of quantifiable indemnification agreements in effect for sales of business entities, assets and third party loans was $719 million.

In addition, the Company has agreed to provide indemnification to third party purchasers for certain losses associated with sold business entities or assets that are not limited by a contractual monetary amount. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding unlimited indemnifications in connection with the sales of certain of its business entities or assets that included tax liabilities arising prior to a purchaser’s ownership of an entity or asset, defects in title at the time of sale, employee claims arising prior to closing and in some cases losses arising from certain litigation and undisclosed liabilities. These indemnification agreements survive until the applicable statutes of limitation expire, or until the agreed upon contract terms expire.

As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has recorded liabilities of approximately $16 million related to indemnification agreements and management believes that it is not likely that any future indemnity claims will be significantly greater than the amounts recorded.

Note K. Business Segments

The Company’s core property and casualty commercial insurance operations are reported in two business segments: CNA Specialty and CNA Commercial. The Company’s non-core operations are managed in two segments: Life & Group Non-Core and Corporate & Other Non-Core.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note A of the Consolidated Financial Statements within CNAF’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Company manages most of its assets on a legal entity basis, while segment operations are conducted across legal entities. As such, only insurance and reinsurance receivables, insurance reserves and deferred acquisition costs are readily identifiable by individual segment. Distinct investment portfolios are not maintained for each segment; accordingly, allocation of assets to each segment is not performed. Therefore, net investment income and realized investment gains or losses are allocated primarily based on each segment’s net carried insurance reserves, as adjusted. All significant intrasegment income and expense has been eliminated. Income taxes have been allocated on the basis of the taxable income of the segments.

In the following tables, certain financial measures are presented to provide information used by management to monitor the Company’s operating performance. Management utilizes these financial measures to monitor the Company’s insurance operations and investment portfolio. Net operating income, which is derived from certain income statement amounts, is used by management to monitor performance of the Company’s insurance operations. The Company’s investment portfolio is monitored through analysis of various quantitative and qualitative factors and certain decisions related to the sale or OTTI of investments that produce realized gains and losses.

Net operating income (loss) is calculated by excluding from net income (loss) attributable to CNA the after-tax effects of 1) net realized investment gains or losses, 2) income or loss from discontinued operations and 3) any cumulative effects of changes in accounting guidance. The calculation of net operating income excludes net realized investment gains or losses because net realized investment gains or losses are largely discretionary, except for losses related to OTTI, and are generally driven by economic factors that are not necessarily consistent with key drivers of underwriting performance, and are therefore not considered an indication of trends in insurance operations.

The Company’s investment portfolio is monitored by management through analysis of various factors including unrealized gains and losses on securities, portfolio duration and exposure to interest rate, market and credit risk. Based on such analyses, the Company may recognize an OTTI loss on an investment security in accordance with its policy, or sell a security. Such activities will produce realized gains and losses.

The significant components of the Company’s continuing operations and selected balance sheet items are presented in the following tables.


Three months ended	CNA			CNA			Life & Group			Corporate & Other
September 30, 2010	Specialty			Commercial			Non-Core			Non-Core			Eliminations			Total
(In millions)
Revenues
Net earned premiums	$	679		$	819		$	145		$	3		$	(1	)	$	1,645
Net investment income		148			214			182			37			—			581
Other revenues		57			15			4			(1	)		—			75

Total operating revenues		884			1,048			331			39			(1	)		2,301

Claims, Benefits and Expenses
Net incurred claims and benefits		393			576			354			14			—			1,337
Policyholders’ dividends		2			4			1			—			—			7
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		162			183			6			—			—			351
Other insurance related expenses		45			104			41			9			(1	)		198
Other expenses		47			14			7			569			—			637

Total claims, benefits and expenses		649			881			409			592			(1	)		2,530

Operating income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax		235			167			(78	)		(553	)		—			(229	)
Income tax (expense) benefit on operating income (loss)		(80	)		(54	)		23			198			—			87
Net operating (income) loss, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		(11	)		(5	)		—			—			—			(16	)


Net operating income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA		144			108			(55	)		(355	)		—			(158	)

Net realized investment gains, net of participating policyholders’ interests		15			21			20			6			—			62
Income tax expense on net realized investment gains		(6	)		(8	)		(7	)		(2	)		—			(23	)
Net realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			1			—			—			—			1


Net realized investment gains attributable to CNA		9			14			13			4			—			40


Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA	$	153		$	122		$	(42	)	$	(351	)	$	—		$	(118	)


Three months ended	CNA			CNA			Life & Group			Corporate & Other
September 30, 2009	Specialty			Commercial			Non-Core			Non-Core			Eliminations		Total
(In millions)
Revenues
Net earned premiums	$	687		$	874		$	149		$	(3	)	$	—	$	1,707
Net investment income		154			276			169			61			—		660
Other revenues		53			13			2			5			—		73

Total operating revenues		894			1,163			320			63			—		2,440

Claims, Benefits and Expenses
Net incurred claims and benefits		410			642			199			25			—		1,276
Policyholders’ dividends		1			4			2			—			—		7
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		157			203			5			—			—		365
Other insurance related expenses		40			118			45			1			—		204
Other expenses		45			23			7			27			—		102

Total claims, benefits and expenses		653			990			258			53			—		1,954

Operating income from continuing operations before income tax		241			173			62			10			—		486
Income tax expense on operating income		(78	)		(52	)		(11	)		(1	)		—		(142	)
Net operating (income) loss, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		(10	)		(3	)		—			—			—		(13	)


Net operating income from continuing operations attributable to CNA		153			118			51			9			—		331

Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders’ interests		(35	)		(69	)		21			(17	)		—		(100	)
Income tax (expense) benefit on net realized investment gains (losses)		11			24			(7	)		6			—		34
Net realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			(1	)		—			—			—		(1	)


Net realized investment gains (losses) attributable to CNA		(24	)		(46	)		14			(11	)		—		(67	)


Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA	$	129		$	72		$	65		$	(2	)	$	—	$	264


Nine months ended	CNA			CNA			Life & Group			Corporate & Other
September 30, 2010	Specialty			Commercial			Non-Core			Non-Core			Eliminations			Total
(In millions)
Revenues
Net earned premiums	$	1,998		$	2,432		$	436		$	5		$	(3	)	$	4,868
Net investment income		420			613			531			128			—			1,692
Other revenues		162			49			10			5			—			226

Total operating revenues		2,580			3,094			977			138			(3	)		6,786

Claims, Benefits and Expenses
Net incurred claims and benefits		1,115			1,662			949			54			—			3,780
Policyholders’ dividends		6			11			2			—			—			19
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		471			552			15			—			—			1,038
Other insurance related expenses		139			318			137			10			(3	)		601
Other expenses		141			42			13			641			—			837

Total claims, benefits and expenses		1,872			2,585			1,116			705			(3	)		6,275

Operating income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax		708			509			(139	)		(567	)		—			511
Income tax (expense) benefit on operating income (loss)		(238	)		(165	)		67			204			—			(132	)
Net operating (income) loss, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		(30	)		(15	)		—			—			—			(45	)


Net operating income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA		440			329			(72	)		(363	)		—			334

Net realized investment gains, net of participating policyholders’ interests		60			29			15			21			—			125
Income tax expense on net realized investment gains		(21	)		(16	)		(7	)		(7	)		—			(51	)
Net realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			1			—			—			—			1


Net realized investment gains attributable to CNA		39			14			8			14			—			75


Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA	$	479		$	343		$	(64	)	$	(349	)	$	—		$	409


September 30, 2010 (In millions)
Reinsurance receivables	$	976		$	2,131		$	1,546		$	2,824		$	—		$	7,477
Insurance receivables	$	641		$	1,122		$	8		$	7		$	—		$	1,778
Deferred acquisition costs	$	329		$	328		$	439		$	—		$	—		$	1,096
Insurance reserves
Claim and claim adjustment expenses	$	6,913		$	12,535		$	2,744		$	3,591		$	—		$	25,783
Unearned premiums		1,550			1,577			137			2			(1	)		3,265
Future policy benefits		—			—			8,372			—			—			8,372
Policyholders’ funds		13			13			138			—			—			164


Nine months ended	CNA			CNA			Life & Group			Corporate & Other
September 30, 2009	Specialty			Commercial			Non-Core			Non-Core			Eliminations			Total
(In millions)
Revenues
Net earned premiums	$	2,014		$	2,574		$	447		$	2		$	(2	)	$	5,035
Net investment income		396			702			496			161			—			1,755
Other revenues		153			47			7			6			—			213

Total operating revenues		2,563			3,323			950			169			(2	)		7,003

Claims, Benefits and Expenses
Net incurred claims and benefits		1,209			1,852			773			69			—			3,903
Policyholders’ dividends		7			6			3			—			—			16
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		457			591			15			—			—			1,063
Other insurance related expenses		123			301			138			3			(2	)		563
Other expenses		133			62			64			87			—			346

Total claims, benefits and expenses		1,929			2,812			993			159			(2	)		5,891

Operating income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax		634			511			(43	)		10			—			1,112
Income tax (expense) benefit on operating income (loss)		(195	)		(143	)		46			3			—			(289	)
Net operating (income) loss, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		(26	)		(12	)		—			—			—			(38	)


Net operating income from continuing operations attributable to CNA		413			356			3			13			—			785

Net realized investment losses, net of participating policyholders’ interests		(227	)		(438	)		(156	)		(108	)		—			(929	)
Income tax benefit on net realized investment losses		76			150			55			38			—			319
Net realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—


Net realized investment losses attributable to CNA		(151	)		(288	)		(101	)		(70	)		—			(610	)


Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA	$	262		$	68		$	(98	)	$	(57	)	$	—		$	175


December 31, 2009
(In millions)
Reinsurance receivables	$	1,077	$	2,234	$	1,744	$	1,877	$	—	$	6,932
Insurance receivables	$	613	$	1,234	$	9	$	2	$	—	$	1,858
Deferred acquisition costs	$	318	$	336	$	454	$	—	$	—	$	1,108
Insurance reserves
Claim and claim adjustment expenses	$	6,922	$	13,005	$	2,883	$	4,006	$	—	$	26,816
Unearned premiums		1,528		1,603		140		3		—		3,274
Future policy benefits		—		—		7,981		—		—		7,981
Policyholders’ funds		11		11		170		—		—		192

The following table provides revenue by line of business for each reportable segment. Revenues are comprised of operating revenues and net realized investment gains and losses, net of participating policyholders’ interests.


Revenues by Line of Business
	Three Months					Nine Months
Periods ended September 30	2010			2009		2010			2009
(In millions)
CNA Specialty
Professional & Management Liability	$	650		$	619	$	1,915		$	1,673
International		51			46		150			116
Surety		124			123		357			355
Warranty & Alternative Risks		74			71		218			192


CNA Specialty revenues		899			859		2,640			2,336


CNA Commercial
Commercial Insurance		735			722		2,138			1,895
Business Insurance		142			150		423			393
International		123			160		367			453
CNA Select Risk		69			62		195			144


CNA Commercial revenues		1,069			1,094		3,123			2,885


Life & Group Non-Core
Life & Annuity		69			80		185			167
Health		276			257		796			620
Other		6			4		11			7


Life & Group Non-Core revenues		351			341		992			794


Corporate & Other Non-Core revenues		45			46		159			61


Eliminations		(1	)		—		(3	)		(2	)


Total revenues	$	2,363		$	2,340	$	6,911		$	6,074

Note L. IT Transformation

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company commenced a program involving several initiatives intended to significantly transform its Information Technology (IT) organization and delivery model. A key initiative is moving to a managed services model which involves outsourcing the Company’s infrastructure and application development functions to selected vendors that have proven skills and scale. The IT Transformation is expected to improve both the efficiency and effectiveness of IT delivery in support of the Company’s businesses. The costs of the IT Transformation include estimated employee termination benefits, employee retention benefits, and legal, consulting and other vendor transition services costs. The Company anticipates that the total costs for the IT Transformation will be approximately $41 million, of which $5 million was incurred during the third quarter of 2010. Through September 30, 2010, the Company has incurred $34 million of costs for the IT Transformation and has paid $9 million of these costs. The Company anticipates the program will be completed by December 2011, with the majority of the remaining costs recognized during 2010.

The costs incurred to date are included in Total claims, benefits and expenses on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and have been allocated to the Company’s reportable segments in a manner consistent with the Company’s current allocation of IT expenses, which is primarily based on estimated consumption. The costs by reportable segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are as follows.


IT Transformation Costs by Segment

Nine months ended September 30
(In millions)	2010
CNA Specialty	$	7
CNA Commercial		15
Life & Group Non-Core		9
Corporate & Other Non-Core		3


Total IT Transformation Costs	$	34

Note M. Subsequent Event

As discussed in Note A, the Company currently owns 62% of CNA Surety which is publicly-traded. CNA Surety is included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, with the minority common shareholders proportionate share of CNA Surety’s net income and net equity presented as noncontrolling interests. On November 1, 2010, the Company announced that it has proposed to acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of CNA Surety that are not currently owned by the Company for $22 per share. Any amount paid to acquire the common shares of CNA Surety not owned by the Company above or below the noncontrolling interest reflected in the Company’s equity would be reflected as an adjustment to the Company’s Additional paid-in capital. The noncontrolling interest in the Company’s equity related to CNA Surety at September 30, 2010 was $397 million. There can be no assurance that this transaction will be consummated at the price indicated above or at all.

CNA Financial Corporation

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

The following discussion highlights significant factors impacting the consolidated operations and financial condition of CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF) and its controlled subsidiaries (collectively CNA or the Company). References to “CNA,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or like terms refer to the business of CNA and its subsidiaries. Based on 2009 statutory net written premiums, we are the seventh largest commercial insurance writer and the 13 ^th largest property and casualty insurance organization in the United States of America. References to net operating income (loss), net realized investment gains (losses) and net income (loss) used in this MD&A reflect amounts attributable to CNA, unless otherwise noted.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and Item 1A Risk Factors and Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

We utilize the net operating income financial measure to monitor our operations. Net operating income is calculated by excluding from net income (loss) attributable to CNA the after-tax effects of 1) net realized investment gains or losses, 2) income or loss from discontinued operations and 3) any cumulative effects of changes in accounting guidance. See further discussion regarding how we manage our business in Note K of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1. In evaluating the results of our CNA Specialty and CNA Commercial segments, we utilize the loss ratio, the expense ratio, the dividend ratio and the combined ratio. These ratios are calculated using GAAP financial results. The loss ratio is the percentage of net incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio is the percentage of insurance underwriting and acquisition expenses, including the amortization of deferred acquisition costs, to net earned premiums. The dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholders’ dividends incurred to net earned premiums. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss, expense and dividend ratios.

Changes in estimates of claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves and premium accruals, net of reinsurance, for prior years are defined as net prior year development within this MD&A. These changes can be favorable or unfavorable. Net prior year development does not include the impact of related acquisition expenses. Further information on our reserves is provided in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

Agreement to Cede Asbestos and Environmental Pollution (A&EP) Liabilities to National Indemnity Company (NICO)

As further discussed in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1, on August 31, 2010, we completed a transaction with NICO, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., under which substantially all of our legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to NICO (Loss Portfolio Transfer). We recognized an after-tax net loss of $365 million in the third quarter of 2010, of which $344 million related to our continuing operations. Since a portion of the liabilities ceded related to our discontinued operations, we recognized an after-tax net loss for discontinued operations of $21 million in the third quarter of 2010.

CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

The following table includes the consolidated results of our operations. For more detailed components of our business operations and the net operating income financial measure, see the segment discussions within this MD&A.


Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Revenues
Net earned premiums	$	1,645		$	1,707		$	4,868		$	5,035
Net investment income		581			660			1,692			1,755
Other revenues		75			73			226			213


Total operating revenues		2,301			2,440			6,786			7,003


Claims, Benefits and Expenses
Net incurred claims and benefits		1,337			1,276			3,780			3,903
Policyholders’ dividends		7			7			19			16
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		351			365			1,038			1,063
Other insurance related expenses		198			204			601			563
Other expenses		637			102			837			346


Total claims, benefits and expenses		2,530			1,954			6,275			5,891


Operating income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax		(229	)		486			511			1,112
Income tax (expense) benefit on operating income (loss)		87			(142	)		(132	)		(289	)
Net operating (income) loss, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		(16	)		(13	)		(45	)		(38	)


Net operating income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA		(158	)		331			334			785

Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders’ interests		62			(100	)		125			(929	)
Income tax (expense) benefit on net realized investment gains (losses)		(23	)		34			(51	)		319
Net realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		1			(1	)		1			—

Net realized investment gains (losses) attributable to CNA		40			(67	)		75			(610	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA		(118	)		264			409			175

Loss from discontinued operations attributable to CNA, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $0, $0, $0 and $0		(22	)		(1	)		(21	)		(2	)


Net income (loss) attributable to CNA	$	(140	)	$	263		$	388		$	173

Three Month Comparison

Net results decreased $403 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to lower net operating results driven by the loss associated with the Loss Portfolio Transfer, partially offset by improved net realized investment results. Excluding the loss associated with the Loss Portfolio Transfer, net income decreased $38 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009.

Net realized investment results improved $107 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized investment results and net investment income.

Net operating results decreased $489 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Excluding the loss associated with the Loss Portfolio Transfer, net operating income decreased $145 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Net operating income decreased $19 million for our core segments, CNA Specialty and CNA Commercial. Our core segments were unfavorably impacted by lower net investment income, driven by less favorable limited partnership income, partially offset by increased favorable net prior year development. Net operating results decreased $126 million for our non-core segments, which includes the favorable impact in 2009 of a $61 million after-tax gain arising from the Willis Limited settlement as further discussed in the Life & Group Non-Core segment discussion of this MD&A.

Favorable net prior year development of $93 million and $47 million was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 related to our CNA Specialty, CNA Commercial and Corporate & Other Non-Core segments. Further information on net prior year development for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

Net earned premiums decreased $62 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, driven by a $55 million decrease in CNA Commercial. See the Segment Results section of this MD&A for further discussion.

Net loss from discontinued operations increased $21 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, due to the loss associated with the Loss Portfolio Transfer.

Nine Month Comparison

Net income improved $215 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This improvement was driven by significantly improved net realized investment results, partially offset by a decrease in net operating income, primarily driven by the loss associated with the Loss Portfolio Transfer. Excluding the loss associated with the Loss Portfolio Transfer, net income improved $580 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009.

Net realized investment results improved $685 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized investment results and net investment income.

Net operating income decreased $451 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Excluding the loss associated with the Loss Portfolio Transfer, net operating income decreased $107 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to the same reasons discussed above in the three month comparison. Additionally, results for our core segments were unfavorably impacted by decreased current accident year underwriting results, including higher catastrophe losses.

As further discussed in Note L of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1, we commenced a program during the first quarter of 2010 to significantly transform our IT organization and delivery model. We anticipate that the total costs for this program will be approximately $41 million, of which $34 million was incurred through the third quarter of 2010. When the results of this program are fully operational, we anticipate significant annual savings based on our current annual level of IT spending. A significant portion of the annual savings is anticipated to be achieved in 2011 with full annual savings in 2012. Some or all of these estimated savings may be invested in IT or other enhancements necessary to support our business strategies.

Favorable net prior year development of $393 million and $163 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 related to our CNA Specialty, CNA Commercial and Corporate & Other Non-Core segments. Further information on net prior year development for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

Net earned premiums decreased $167 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, driven by a $142 million decrease in CNA Commercial. See the Segment Results section of this MD&A for further discussion.

Net loss from discontinued operations increased $19 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, due to the loss associated with the Loss Portfolio Transfer.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported during the period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis. We continually evaluate the accounting policies and estimates used to prepare the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In general, our estimates are based on historical experience, evaluation of current trends, information from third party professionals and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the known facts and circumstances.

The accounting estimates below are considered by us to be critical to an understanding of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as their application places the most significant demands on our judgment.

•

Insurance Reserves

•

Reinsurance

•

Valuation of Investments and Impairment of Securities

•

Long Term Care Products

•

Payout Annuity Contracts

•

Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations

•

Legal Proceedings

•

Income Taxes

Due to the inherent uncertainties involved with these types of judgments, actual results could differ significantly from estimates and may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations or equity. See the Critical Accounting Estimates section of our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included under Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for further information.

SEGMENT RESULTS

The following discusses the results of continuing operations for our operating segments.

CNA SPECIALTY

The following table details the results of operations for CNA Specialty.


Results of Operations

Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net written premiums	$	706		$	690		$	2,009		$	2,017
Net earned premiums		679			687			1,998			2,014
Net investment income		148			154			420			396
Net operating income		144			153			440			413
Net realized investment gains (losses), after-tax		9			(24	)		39			(151	)
Net income		153			129			479			262

Ratios
Loss and loss adjustment expense		57.8	%		59.8	%		55.8	%		60.1	%
Expense		30.4			28.8			30.5			28.7
Dividend		0.3			0.2			0.3			0.4


Combined		88.5	%		88.8	%		86.6	%		89.2	%

Three Month Comparison

Net written premiums for CNA Specialty increased $16 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Net written premiums increased in our professional management and liability lines of business. This increase was partially offset by continued decreased insured exposures and lower rates in our architects & engineers and CNA HealthPro lines of business due to current economic and competitive market conditions. These conditions may continue to put ongoing pressure on premium and income levels and the expense ratio. Net earned premiums decreased $8 million as compared to the same period in 2009, due to the impact of decreased net written premiums in prior quarters.

CNA Specialty’s average rate decreased 2% and 1% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 for the policies that renewed during those periods. Retention rates of 86% and 85% were achieved for those policies that were available for renewal in each period.

Net income increased $24 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This increase was due to improved net realized investment results, partially offset by lower net operating income. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized investment results.

Net operating income decreased $9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to decreased current accident year underwriting results and lower net investment income, partially offset by increased favorable net prior year development.

The combined ratio improved 0.3 points for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. The loss ratio improved 2.0 points, primarily due to increased favorable net prior year development, partially offset by the impact of a higher current accident year loss ratio. The expense ratio increased 1.6 points, primarily related to higher underwriting expenses.

Favorable net prior year development of $67 million was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to favorable net prior year development of $36 million for the same period in 2009. Further information on CNA Specialty’s net prior year development for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

Nine Month Comparison

Net written premiums for CNA Specialty decreased $8 million and net earned premiums decreased $16 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, driven by decreased insured exposures and lower rates as discussed in the three month comparison above.

CNA Specialty’s average rate decreased 2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 for the policies that renewed during those periods. Retention rates of 86% and 85% were achieved for those policies that were available for renewal in each period.

Net income improved $217 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This improvement was due to improved net realized investment results and improved net operating income. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized investment results.

Net operating income increased $27 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, primarily due to increased favorable net prior year development and improved net investment income, partially offset by decreased current accident year underwriting results.

The combined ratio improved 2.6 points for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. The loss ratio improved 4.3 points, primarily due to increased favorable net prior year development, partially offset by the impact of a higher current accident year loss ratio. The expense ratio increased 1.8 points primarily related to higher underwriting expenses and higher commission rates. Underwriting expenses were unfavorably impacted by IT Transformation costs. See the Consolidated Operations section of this MD&A for further discussion of IT Transformation costs.

Favorable net prior year development of $220 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to favorable net prior year development of $103 million for the same period in 2009. Further information on CNA Specialty’s net prior year development for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 for CNA Specialty.


Gross and Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

	September 30,		December 31,
(In millions)	2010		2009
Gross Case Reserves	$	2,329	$	2,208
Gross IBNR Reserves		4,584		4,714


Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves	$	6,913	$	6,922


Net Case Reserves	$	1,941	$	1,781
Net IBNR Reserves		4,024		4,085


Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves	$	5,965	$	5,866

CNA COMMERCIAL

The following table details the results of operations for CNA Commercial.


Results of Operations

Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net written premiums	$	763		$	787		$	2,430		$	2,647
Net earned premiums		819			874			2,432			2,574
Net investment income		214			276			613			702
Net operating income		108			118			329			356
Net realized investment gains (losses), after-tax		14			(46	)		14			(288	)
Net income		122			72			343			68

Ratios
Loss and loss adjustment expense		70.2	%		73.4	%		68.3	%		71.9	%
Expense		35.1			36.8			35.8			34.7
Dividend		0.4			0.4			0.4			0.2


Combined		105.7	%		110.6	%		104.5	%		106.8	%

Three Month Comparison

Net written premiums for CNA Commercial decreased $24 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Premiums written were unfavorably impacted by decreased insured exposures and decreased new business as a result of competitive market conditions. Current economic conditions have led to decreased insured exposures, such as in the construction industry due to smaller payrolls and reduced project volume. These conditions may continue to put ongoing pressure on premium and income levels and the expense ratio. Net earned premiums decreased $55 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, consistent with the trend of lower net written premiums.

CNA Commercial’s average rate was flat for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 for the policies that renewed during those periods. Retention rates of 81% and 80% were achieved for those policies that were available for renewal in each period.

Net income improved $50 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This improvement was due to improved net realized investment results, partially offset by lower net operating income. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized investment results and net investment income.

Net operating income decreased $10 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to lower net investment income, driven by less favorable limited partnership income, partially offset by increased favorable net prior year development.

The combined ratio improved 4.9 points for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. The loss ratio improved 3.2 points, primarily due to increased favorable net prior year development and decreased catastrophe losses. Catastrophe losses were $11 million, or 1.4 points of the loss ratio, for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to $21 million, or 2.4 points of the loss ratio, for the same period in 2009.

The expense ratio improved 1.7 points for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, primarily due to the favorable impact of a reduction in the allowance for uncollectible insurance receivables and decreased unfavorable changes in estimates for insurance-related assessments. These favorable impacts were partially offset by the unfavorable impact of the lower net earned premium base.

Favorable net prior year development of $28 million was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to favorable net prior year development of $12 million for the same period in 2009. Further information on CNA Commercial net prior year development for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

Nine Month Comparison

Net written premiums for CNA Commercial decreased $217 million and net earned premiums decreased $142 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, primarily due to the same reasons discussed above in the three month comparison.

CNA Commercial’s average rate increased 1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to a decrease of 1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 for the policies that renewed during those periods. Retention rates of 79% and 81% were achieved for those policies that were available for renewal in each period.

Net income improved $275 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, due to the same reasons discussed above in the three month comparison.

Net operating income decreased $27 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to lower net investment income, driven by less favorable limited partnership income, and decreased current accident year underwriting results, including higher catastrophe losses. These unfavorable items were partially offset by increased favorable net prior year development.

The combined ratio improved 2.3 points for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. The loss ratio improved 3.6 points, primarily due to 4.9 points of increased favorable net prior year development, partially offset by increased catastrophe losses and the impact of a higher current accident year non-catastrophe loss ratio. Catastrophe losses were $94 million, or 3.9 points of the loss ratio, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to $73 million, or 2.8 points of the loss ratio, for the same period in 2009.

The expense ratio increased 1.1 points for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, primarily due to increased underwriting expenses and the unfavorable impact of the lower net earned premium base. Underwriting expenses were unfavorably impacted by IT Transformation costs. See the Consolidated Operations section of this MD&A for further discussion of IT Transformation costs.

Favorable net prior year development of $175 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to favorable net prior year development of $63 million for the same period in 2009. Further information on CNA Commercial net prior year development for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 for CNA Commercial.


Gross and Net Carried
Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

	September 30,		December 31,
(In millions)	2010		2009
Gross Case Reserves	$	6,443	$	6,510
Gross IBNR Reserves		6,092		6,495


Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves	$	12,535	$	13,005


Net Case Reserves	$	5,270	$	5,269
Net IBNR Reserves		5,218		5,580


Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves	$	10,488	$	10,849

LIFE & GROUP NON-CORE

The following table summarizes the results of operations for Life & Group Non-Core.


Results of Operations

Periods ended September 30	Three Months					Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009		2010			2009
Net earned premiums	$	145		$	149	$	436		$	447
Net investment income		182			169		531			496
Net operating income (loss)		(55	)		51		(72	)		3
Net realized investment gains (losses), after-tax		13			14		8			(101	)
Net income (loss)		(42	)		65		(64	)		(98	)

Three Month Comparison

Net earned premiums for Life & Group Non-Core decreased $4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Net earned premiums relate primarily to the individual and group long term care businesses.

Net results decreased $107 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to the favorable impact in 2009 of a $61 million after-tax gain arising from a settlement reached with Willis Limited that resolved litigation related to the placement of personal accident reinsurance. Also contributing to the decrease in net results was a $39 million pretax and after-tax increase to payout annuity benefit reserves resulting from unlocking assumptions due to loss recognition, and less favorable performance on our pension deposit business.

Certain of the separate account investment contracts related to our pension deposit business guarantee principal and an annual minimum rate of interest, for which we recorded an additional pretax liability in Policyholders’ funds during 2008 based on the results of the investments supporting this business at that time. During the third quarter of 2009, we decreased this pretax liability by $18 million based on improved results from these investments. During the third quarter of 2010, we decreased the remaining pretax liability by $7 million based on the results from these investments. We no longer carry an additional liability in Policyholders’ funds for these separate account investment contracts.

Nine Month Comparison

Net earned premiums for Life & Group Non-Core decreased $11 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009.

Net results improved $34 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. This improvement was primarily due to improved net realized investment results. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized investment results. In addition, 2009 results included the unfavorable impact of a $28 million after-tax legal accrual recorded in the second quarter of 2009. Partially offsetting these favorable impacts was the unfavorable Willis Limited settlement and the increase in the payout annuity benefit reserves as discussed above in the three month comparison, as well as unfavorable results in our long term care business.

CORPORATE & OTHER NON-CORE

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the Corporate & Other Non-Core segment, including A&EP and intrasegment eliminations.

Results of Operations


Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net investment income	$	37		$	61		$	128		$	161
Net operating income (loss)		(355	)		9			(363	)		13
Net realized investment gains (losses), after-tax		4			(11	)		14			(70	)
Net loss		(351	)		(2	)		(349	)		(57	)

Three Month Comparison

Net loss increased $349 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, driven by the after-tax net loss of $344 million as a result of the Loss Portfolio Transfer, as previously discussed in this MD&A. Net results were also impacted by lower net investment income and higher interest expense. Partially offsetting these unfavorable items were improved net realized investment results. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net investment income and net realized investment results.

Unfavorable net prior year development of $2 million was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to unfavorable net prior year development of $1 million for the same period of 2009.

Nine Month Comparison

Net loss increased $292 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009, primarily due to the same reasons discussed above in the three month comparison.

Unfavorable net prior year development of $2 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to unfavorable net prior year development of $3 million for the same period of 2009.

The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 for Corporate & Other Non-Core.

Gross and Net Carried
Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves


	September 30,		December 31,
(In millions)	2010		2009
Gross Case Reserves	$	1,497	$	1,548
Gross IBNR Reserves		2,094		2,458


Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves	$	3,591	$	4,006


Net Case Reserves	$	504	$	972
Net IBNR Reserves		365		1,515


Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves	$	869	$	2,487

Total net carried claim and claim adjustment expense reserves decreased primarily as a result of the Loss Portfolio Transfer, as previously discussed in this MD&A.

INVESTMENTS

Net Investment Income

The significant components of net investment income are presented in the following table.

Net Investment Income


Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Fixed maturity securities	$	511		$	496		$	1,540		$	1,458
Short term investments		2			7			13			28
Limited partnerships		68			145			136			240
Equity securities		7			11			26			39
Mortgage loans		1			—			1			—
Trading portfolio		4			12			10			20
Other		2			2			7			6


Gross investment income		595			673			1,733			1,791
Investment expense		(14	)		(13	)		(41	)		(36	)


Net investment income	$	581		$	660		$	1,692		$	1,755

Net investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased $79 million as compared with the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily driven by less favorable income from our limited partnership investments. Limited partnership investments generally present greater volatility, higher illiquidity and greater risk than fixed income investments.

Net investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased $63 million as compared with the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily driven by less favorable income from our limited partnership investments, partially offset by the impact of reducing our short term and tax-exempt assets and shifting to higher yielding taxable long term bonds.

The fixed maturity investment portfolio and short term investments provided a pretax effective income yield of 5.2% and 5.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Tax-exempt municipal bonds generated $61 million and $207 million of net investment income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared with $90 million and $295 million of net investment income for the same periods in 2009.

Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)

The components of net realized investment results are presented in the following table.

Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)


Periods ended September 30	Three Months						Nine Months
(In millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government agencies	$	—		$	(34	)	$	4		$	(61	)
Asset-backed		22			(104	)		32			(603	)
States, municipalities and political subdivisions		7			17			15			72
Foreign government		—			1			1			27
Corporate and other bonds		47			8			110			(288	)
Redeemable preferred stock		—			—			7			(9	)

Total fixed maturity securities		76			(112	)		169			(862	)

Equity securities		(17	)		19			(42	)		(133	)
Derivative securities		(1	)		(13	)		(1	)		51
Short term investments and other		4			6			(1	)		15


Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders’ interests		62			(100	)		125			(929	)
Income tax (expense) benefit on net realized investment gains (losses)		(23	)		34			(51	)		319
Net realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests		1			(1	)		1			—


Net realized investment gains (losses) attributable to CNA	$	40		$	(67	)	$	75		$	(610	)

Net realized investment results improved $107 million and $685 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared with the same periods in 2009. The improved results were driven by significantly lower other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses recognized in earnings. Further information on our realized gains and losses, including our OTTI losses and impairment decision process, is set forth in Note D of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company adopted updated accounting guidance, which amended the OTTI loss model for fixed maturity securities, as discussed in Note B of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

Our fixed maturity portfolio consists primarily of high quality bonds, 90% of which were rated as investment grade (rated BBB- or higher) at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The classification between investment grade and non-investment grade is based on a ratings methodology that takes into account ratings from two major providers, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s) in that order of preference. If a security is not rated by these providers, we formulate an internal rating. For securities with credit support from third party guarantees, the rating reflects the greater of the underlying rating of the issuer or the insured rating.

The following table summarizes the ratings of our fixed maturity portfolio at carrying value.


Fixed Maturity Ratings

	September 30,					December 31,
(In millions)	2010		%			2009		%
U.S. Government and Agencies	$	3,152		8	%	$	3,705		10	%
AAA rated		5,229		14			5,855		17
AA and A rated		15,217		39			12,464		35
BBB rated		11,336		29			10,122		28
Non-investment grade		3,712		10			3,466		10


Total	$	38,646		100	%	$	35,612		100	%

Non-investment grade fixed maturity securities, as presented in the table below, include high-yield securities rated below BBB- by bond rating agencies and other unrated securities that, according to our analysis, are below investment grade. Non-investment grade securities generally involve a greater degree of risk than investment grade securities. The amortized cost of our non-investment grade fixed maturity bond portfolio was $3,678 million and $3,637 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The following table summarizes the ratings of this portfolio at carrying value.

Non-investment Grade


	September 30,
(In millions)	2010		%			December 31, 2009		%
BB	$	1,425		39	%	$	1,352		39	%
B		1,157		31			1,255		36
CCC — C		1,013		27			761		22
D		117		3			98		3

Total	$	3,712		100	%	$	3,466		100	%

Included within the fixed maturity portfolio are securities that contain credit support from third party guarantees from mono-line insurers. At September 30, 2010, $587 million of the carrying value of the fixed maturity portfolio had a third party guarantee that increased the underlying average rating of those securities from A+ to AA+. Of this amount, over 95% was within the states, municipalities and political subdivisions securities sector.

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately 98% and 99% of the fixed maturity portfolio was issued by the U.S. Government and Agencies or was rated by S&P or Moody’s. The remaining bonds were rated by other rating agencies or internally.

The carrying value of fixed maturity and equity securities that are either subject to trading restrictions or trade in illiquid private placement markets at September 30, 2010 was $299 million, which represents approximately 0.7% of our total investment portfolio. These securities were in a net unrealized gain position of $16 million at September 30, 2010.

The following table provides available-for-sale fixed maturity securities in a gross unrealized loss position at September 30, 2010 by maturity profile. Securities not due at a single date are allocated based on weighted average life.


	Percent of			Percent of
Maturity Profile	Fair Value			Unrealized Loss
Due in one year or less		5	%		3	%
Due after one year through five years		15			15
Due after five years through ten years		39			33
Due after ten years		41			49


Total		100	%		100	%

Duration

A primary objective in the management of the fixed maturity and equity portfolios is to optimize return relative to underlying liabilities and respective liquidity needs. Our views on the current interest rate environment, tax regulations, asset class valuations, specific security issuer and broader industry segment conditions, and the domestic and global economic conditions, are some of the factors that enter into an investment decision. We also continually monitor exposure to issuers of securities held and broader industry sector exposures and may from time to time adjust such exposures based on our views of a specific issuer or industry sector.

A further consideration in the management of the investment portfolio is the characteristics of the underlying liabilities and the ability to align the duration of the portfolio to those liabilities to meet future liquidity needs, minimize interest rate risk and maintain a level of income sufficient to support the underlying insurance liabilities. For portfolios where future liability cash flows are determinable and typically long term in nature, we segregate investments for asset/liability management purposes. The segregated investments support

liabilities primarily in the Life & Group Non-Core segment including annuities, structured benefit settlements and long term care products.

The effective durations of fixed maturity securities, short term investments, non-redeemable preferred stocks and interest rate derivatives are presented in the table below. Short term investments are net of securities lending collateral, if any, and accounts payable and receivable amounts for securities purchased and sold, but not yet settled.

Effective Durations


	September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
			Effective Duration				Effective Duration
(In millions)	Fair Value		(In years)		Fair Value		(In years)
Segregated investments	$	11,968		11.2	$	10,376		11.2
Other interest sensitive investments		29,077		4.6		29,665		4.0


Total Fair Value	$	41,045		6.6	$	40,041		5.8

The investment portfolio is periodically analyzed for changes in duration and related price change risk. Additionally, we periodically review the sensitivity of the portfolio to the level of foreign exchange rates and other factors that contribute to market price changes. A summary of these risks and specific analysis on changes is included in the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Asset-Backed Exposure

Asset-Backed Distribution


September 30, 2010	Security Type
(In millions)	RMBS (a)		CMBS (b)		Other ABS (c)		Total
U.S. Government Agencies	$	2,946	$	32	$	—	$	2,978
AAA		1,167		382		486		2,035
AA		224		173		65		462
A		197		261		66		524
BBB		247		113		24		384
Non-investment grade and equity tranches		1,195		40		24		1,259

Total Fair Value	$	5,976	$	1,001	$	665	$	7,642

Total Amortized Cost	$	6,089	$	1,032	$	650	$	7,771


Sub-prime (included above)
Fair Value	$	555	$	—	$	—	$	555
Amortized Cost	$	596	$	—	$	—	$	596

Alt-A (included above)
Fair Value	$	680	$	—	$	—	$	680
Amortized Cost	$	720	$	—	$	—	$	720


(a)		Residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS)

(b)		Commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS)

(c)		Other asset-backed securities (Other ABS)

The exposure to sub-prime residential mortgage (sub-prime) collateral and Alternative A residential mortgages that have lower than normal standards of loan documentation (Alt-A) collateral is measured by the original deal structure. Of the securities with sub-prime exposure, approximately 68% were rated investment grade, while 82% of the Alt-A securities were rated investment grade. At September 30, 2010, $7 million of the carrying value of the sub-prime and Alt-A securities carried a third-party guarantee.

Pretax OTTI losses of $21 million for securities with sub-prime and Alt-A exposure were included in the $59 million of pretax OTTI losses related to asset-backed securities recognized in earnings on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Continued deterioration in the underlying collateral beyond our current expectations may cause us to reconsider and recognize additional OTTI losses in earnings. See Note D of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 for additional information related to unrealized losses on asset-backed securities.

Short Term Investments

The carrying value of the components of the short term investment portfolio is presented in the following table.


Short Term Investments	September 30,		December 31,
(In millions)	2010		2009
Short term investments available-for-sale:
Commercial paper	$	670	$	185
U.S. Treasury securities		884		3,025
Money market funds		126		179
Other		404		560


Total short term investments	$	2,084	$	3,949

There was no cash collateral held related to securities lending at September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flows

Our principal operating cash flow sources are premiums and investment income from our insurance subsidiaries. Our primary operating cash flow uses are payments for claims, policy benefits and operating expenses.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash used by operating activities was $673 million as compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $275 million for the same period in 2009. As previously discussed in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 and previously discussed in this MD&A, on August 31, 2010, we completed a transaction whereby substantially all of our legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to NICO. As a result of this transaction, operating cash flows were reduced for the initial net cash settlement with NICO.

Additionally, we received a federal income tax refund of $328 million in 2010 compared to $117 million in 2009. Further, because cash receipts and cash payments resulting from purchases and sales of trading securities are reported as cash flows related to operating activities, operating cash flows were reduced by $621 million in 2009 related to net cash outflows which increased the size of the trading portfolio held at September 30, 2009. During 2010, operating cash flows were increased by $125 million related to net cash inflows primarily from sales of trading securities. Excluding the items above, net cash generated by our business operations was approximately $775 million for both 2010 and 2009.

Cash flows from investing activities include the purchase and sale of available-for-sale financial instruments. Additionally, cash flows from investing activities may include the purchase and sale of businesses, land, buildings, equipment and other assets not generally held for resale.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash provided by investing activities was $860 million as compared with net cash of $168 million used by investing activities for the same period in 2009. Cash flow from investing activities is impacted by various factors such as the anticipated payment of claims, financing activity, asset/liability management and individual security buy and sell decisions made in the normal course of portfolio management. Net cash provided by investing activities in 2010 primarily related to the sale of short term investments. The cash provided by investing activities was used to fund the $1.9 billion initial net cash settlement with NICO as discussed above.

Cash flows from financing activities include proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, outflows for dividends or repayment of debt, outlays to reacquire equity instruments, and deposits and withdrawals related to investment contract products issued by us.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash used by financing activities was $245 million as compared with $72 million for the same period in 2009. Net cash used by financing activities in 2010 was primarily related to the repayment of $150 million on an outstanding credit facility and to the payment of dividends on the 2008 Senior Preferred to Loews Corporation. In addition, in the third quarter of 2010 we issued $500 million of 5.875% ten-year senior notes and used the net proceeds of the offering, together with cash on hand, to redeem $500 million, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, of the 2008 Senior Preferred, as discussed further below.

Liquidity

We believe that our present cash flows from operations, investing activities and financing activities are sufficient to fund our current and expected working capital and debt obligation needs and we do not expect this to change in the near term.

We have an effective automatic shelf registration statement under which we may issue debt, equity or hybrid securities.

In 2008, the Company issued, and Loews purchased, 12,500 shares of CNAF non-voting cumulative senior preferred stock (2008 Senior Preferred) for $1.25 billion. CNAF used the majority of the proceeds from the 2008 Senior Preferred to increase the statutory surplus of its principal insurance subsidiary, Continental Casualty Company (CCC), through the purchase of a $1.0 billion surplus note of CCC. Surplus notes are financial instruments with a stated maturity date and scheduled interest payments, issued by insurance enterprises with the approval of the insurer’s domiciliary state. Surplus notes are treated as capital under statutory accounting. All payments of interest and principal on this note are subject to the prior approval of the Illinois Department of Insurance (the Department). The surplus note of CCC has a term of 30 years and accrues interest at a rate of 10% per year. Interest on the note is payable quarterly. We have requested regulatory approval from the Department for CCC to repay $500 million of the $1.0 billion surplus note to CNAF during the fourth quarter of 2010.

We anticipate utilizing the proceeds from the repayment, if consummated, to redeem the remaining $500 million, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, of the 2008 Senior Preferred. During 2009 we redeemed $250 million of the 2008 Senior Preferred, and during the third quarter of 2010 we redeemed $500 million of the 2008 Senior Preferred. The redemption anticipated above, if consummated, would fully redeem all 12,500 shares originally issued in 2008.

As discussed in Note M of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1, on November 1, 2010, we announced that we have proposed to acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of CNA Surety Corporation (CNA Surety) that are not currently owned by us for $22 per share. Based on the offer price of $22 per share and minority shares outstanding at September 30, 2010, the aggregate purchase price would be approximately $375 million. We anticipate funding the acquisition of these shares of common stock with available funds. There can be no assurance that this transaction will be consummated at the price indicated above or at all.

Accounting Standards Updates

For discussion of accounting standards updates that have been adopted or will be adopted in the future, see Note B of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains a number of forward-looking statements which relate to anticipated future events rather than actual present conditions or historical events. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and generally include words such as “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this report include any and all statements regarding expected developments in our insurance business, including losses and loss reserves for asbestos and environmental pollution and other mass tort claims which are more uncertain, and therefore more difficult to estimate than loss reserves respecting traditional property and casualty exposures; the impact of routine ongoing insurance reserve reviews we are conducting; our expectations concerning our revenues, earnings, expenses and investment activities; volatility in investment returns; expected cost savings and other results from our expense reduction activities; and our proposed actions in response to trends in our business. Forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to a variety of inherent risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results projected in the forward-looking statement. We cannot control many of these risks and uncertainties. Some examples of these risks and uncertainties are:

•		conditions in the capital and credit markets, including continuing uncertainty and instability in these markets, as well as the overall economy, and their impact on the returns, types, liquidity and valuation of our investments;

•		general economic and business conditions, including recessionary conditions that may decrease the size and number of our insurance customers and create additional losses to our lines of business, especially those that provide management and professional liability insurance, as well as surety bonds, to businesses engaged in real estate, financial services and professional services, and inflationary pressures on medical care costs, construction costs and other economic sectors that increase the severity of claims;

•		the effects of failures in the financial services industry, as well as irregularities in financial reporting and other corporate governance matters, on the markets for directors & officers and errors & omissions coverages, as well as on capital and credit markets;

•		changes in foreign or domestic political, social and economic conditions;

•		regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations, judicial decisions, including interpretation of policy provisions, decisions regarding coverage and theories of liability, trends in litigation and the outcome of any litigation involving us, and rulings and changes in tax laws and regulations;

•		regulatory limitations, impositions and restrictions upon us, including the effects of assessments and other surcharges for guaranty funds and second-injury funds, other mandatory pooling arrangements and future assessments levied on insurance companies and other financial industry participants under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 recoupment provisions, as well as the new federal financial regulatory reform of the insurance industry established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act;

•		increased operating costs and underwriting losses arising from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the related amendments in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, as well as health care reform proposals at the state level;

•		the impact of competitive products, policies and pricing and the competitive environment in which we operate, including changes in our book of business;

•		product and policy availability and demand and market responses, including the level of ability to obtain rate increases and decline or non-renew under priced accounts, to achieve premium targets and profitability and to realize growth and retention estimates;

•		development of claims and the impact on loss reserves, including changes in claim settlement policies;

•		the performance of reinsurance companies under reinsurance contracts with us;

•		conditions in the capital and credit markets that may limit our ability to raise significant amounts of capital on favorable terms, as well as restrictions on the ability or willingness of Loews to provide additional capital support to us;

•		weather and other natural physical events, including the severity and frequency of storms, hail, snowfall and other winter conditions, natural disasters such as hurricanes and earthquakes, as well as climate change, including effects on weather patterns, greenhouse gases, sea, land and air temperatures, sea levels, rain and snow;

•		regulatory requirements imposed by coastal state regulators in the wake of hurricanes or other natural disasters, including limitations on the ability to exit markets or to non-renew, cancel or change terms and conditions in policies, as well as mandatory assessments to fund any shortfalls arising from the inability of quasi-governmental insurers to pay claims;

•		man-made disasters, including the possible occurrence of terrorist attacks and the effect of the absence or insufficiency of applicable terrorism legislation on coverages;

•		the unpredictability of the nature, targets, severity or frequency of potential terrorist events, as well as the uncertainty as to our ability to contain our terrorism exposure effectively, notwithstanding the extension through December 31, 2014 of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002;

•		the occurrence of epidemics;

•		mass tort claims, including bodily injury claims related to welding rods, benzene, lead and noise induced hearing loss claims, as well as claims relating to various medical products including pharmaceuticals;

•		the risks and uncertainties associated with our loss reserves, as outlined in the Critical Accounting Estimates and the Reserves — Estimates and Uncertainties sections under Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the sufficiency of the reserves and the possibility for future increases;

•		regulatory limitations and restrictions, including limitations upon our ability to receive dividends from our insurance subsidiaries imposed by state regulatory agencies and minimum risk-based capital standards established by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners;

•		the possibility of changes in our ratings by ratings agencies, including the inability to access certain markets or distribution channels and the required collateralization of future payment obligations as a result of such changes, and changes in rating agency policies and practices; and

•		with respect to the transaction in which we ceded A&EP liabilities referenced in this document, whether the other parties to the transaction will fully perform their obligations to CNA, the uncertainty in estimating loss reserves for A&EP liabilities and the possible continued exposure of CNA to liabilities for A&EP claims.

Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statement, even if our expectations or any related events or circumstances change.

CNA Financial Corporation

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There were no material changes in our market risk components for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. See the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in Item 7A on our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2009 for further information. Additional information related to portfolio duration is discussed in the Investments section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part I, Item 2.

CNA Financial Corporation

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of September 30, 2010, the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2010.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

CNA Financial Corporation

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Information on our legal proceedings is set forth in Note H of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes a detailed discussion of certain material risk factors facing us. The information presented below describes updates and additions to such risk factors and should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and information disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

We may face increased operating costs and underwriting losses arising from the federal health care reform legislation, as well as health care reform proposals at the state level.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the related amendments in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, enacted in March 2010, may increase our operating costs and underwriting losses. This landmark legislation may lead to numerous changes in the health care industry that could create additional operating costs for us, particularly with respect to our workers’ compensation and long term care products. These costs might arise through the increased use of health care services by our claimants or the increased complexities in health care bills that could require additional levels of review. In addition, due to the expected number of new participants in the health care system and the potential for additional malpractice claims, we may experience increased underwriting risk in the lines of our business that provide management and professional liability insurance to individuals and businesses engaged in the health care industry. The lines of our business that provide professional liability insurance to attorneys, accountants and other professionals who advise clients regarding the health care reform legislation may also experience increased underwriting risk due to the complexity of the legislation. As a result, we may experience unanticipated underwriting losses with respect to these lines of business. Finally, we cannot predict with any certainty the impact upon us of the various health care reform proposals at the state level. Consequently, our results of operations, equity, business, insurer financial strength and debt ratings could be materially adversely impacted.

We are unable to predict the impact on us of the new federal financial regulatory reform.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, expands the federal presence in insurance oversight. The Act’s requirements include streamlining the state-based regulation of reinsurance and nonadmitted insurance (property or casualty insurance placed from insurers that are eligible to accept insurance, but are not licensed to write insurance in a particular state). The Act also establishes a new Federal Insurance Office within the U.S. Department of the Treasury with powers over all lines of insurance except health insurance, certain long-term care insurance and crop insurance, to, among other things, monitor aspects of the insurance industry, identify issues in the regulation of insurers that could contribute to a systemic crisis in the insurance industry or the overall financial system, coordinate federal policy on international insurance matters and preempt state insurance measures under certain circumstances. As the Act calls for numerous studies and contemplates further regulation, we are unable to predict with any certainty the overall impact the reform will have on us. As a result, our results of operations, equity, business, and insurer financial strength and debt ratings could be materially adversely impacted.

Item 6. Exhibits

See Exhibit Index.

CNA Financial Corporation

Part II. Other Information

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	CNA Financial Corporation
Dated: November 2, 2010	By	/s/ D. Craig Mense
		D. Craig Mense
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX


Description of Exhibit	Exhibit Number

Administrative Services Agreement, dated August 31, 2010, among Continental Casualty Company, The Continental Insurance Company, Continental Reinsurance Corporation International, Ltd., CNA Insurance Company Limited and National Indemnity Company (Exhibit 10.1 to September 1, 2010 Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference)		10.1

Collateral Trust Agreement, dated August 31, 2010, among Continental Casualty Company, The Continental Insurance Company, Continental Reinsurance Corporation International, Ltd., CNA Insurance Company Limited, National Indemnity Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Exhibit 10.2 to September 1, 2010 Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference)		10.2

Loss Portfolio Transfer Reinsurance Agreement, dated August 31, 2010, among Continental Casualty Company, The Continental Insurance Company, Continental Reinsurance Corporation International, Ltd., CNA Insurance Company Limited and National Indemnity Company (Exhibit 10.3 to September 1, 2010 Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference)		10.3

Amendment No. 1 to the Master Transaction Agreement, dated August 31, 2010, among Continental Casualty Company, The Continental Insurance Company, Continental Reinsurance Corporation International, Ltd., CNA Insurance Company Limited and National Indemnity Company (Exhibit 10.4 to September 1, 2010 Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference)		10.4

Parental Guarantee Agreement, dated August 31, 2010, made by Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in favor of Continental Casualty Company, The Continental Insurance Company, Continental Reinsurance Corporation International, Ltd. and CNA Insurance Company Limited (Exhibit 10.5 to September 1, 2010 Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference)		10.5

2008 Senior Preferred Stock Redemption Agreement, dated August 5, 2010, by and between CNA Financial Corporation and Loews Corporation. (Exhibit 10.1 to August 6, 2010 Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference)		10.6

Certification of Chief Executive Officer		31.1

Certification of Chief Financial Officer		31.2

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)		32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)		32.2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. Financial Information Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Item 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis (md&a) Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 4. Controls and Procedures Part II. Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

EX-31.1 EX-31.2 EX-32.1 EX-32.2

CNA 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010

Exhibits