These terms and conditions govern your use of the website alphaminr.com and its related services.
These Terms and Conditions (“Terms”) are a binding contract between you and Alphaminr, (“Alphaminr”, “we”, “us” and “service”). You must agree to and accept the Terms. These Terms include the provisions in this document as well as those in the Privacy Policy. These terms may be modified at any time.
Your subscription will be on a month to month basis and automatically renew every month. You may terminate your subscription at any time through your account.
We will provide you with advance notice of any change in fees.
You represent that you are of legal age to form a binding contract. You are responsible for any
activity associated with your account. The account can be logged in at only one computer at a
time.
The Services are intended for your own individual use. You shall only use the Services in a
manner that complies with all laws. You may not use any automated software, spider or system to
scrape data from Alphaminr.
Alphaminr is not a financial advisor and does not provide financial advice of any kind. The service is provided “As is”. The materials and information accessible through the Service are solely for informational purposes. While we strive to provide good information and data, we make no guarantee or warranty as to its accuracy.
TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL ALPHAMINR BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR INVESTMENT LOSSES, LOSS OF DATA, OR ACCURACY OF DATA, OR FOR ANY AMOUNT, IN THE AGGREGATE, IN EXCESS OF THE GREATER OF (1) FIFTY DOLLARS OR (2) THE AMOUNTS PAID BY YOU TO ALPHAMINR IN THE SIX MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THIS APPLICABLE CLAIM. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL OR CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES, SO THE ABOVE LIMITATION AND EXCLUSIONS MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
If any provision of these Terms is found to be invalid under any applicable law, such provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions herein.
This privacy policy describes how we (“Alphaminr”) collect, use, share and protect your personal information when we provide our service (“Service”). This Privacy Policy explains how information is collected about you either directly or indirectly. By using our service, you acknowledge the terms of this Privacy Notice. If you do not agree to the terms of this Privacy Policy, please do not use our Service. You should contact us if you have questions about it. We may modify this Privacy Policy periodically.
When you register for our Service, we collect information from you such as your name, email address and credit card information.
Like many other websites we use “cookies”, which are small text files that are stored on your computer or other device that record your preferences and actions, including how you use the website. You can set your browser or device to refuse all cookies or to alert you when a cookie is being sent. If you delete your cookies, if you opt-out from cookies, some Services may not function properly. We collect information when you use our Service. This includes which pages you visit.
We use Google Analytics and we use Stripe for payment processing. We will not share the information we collect with third parties for promotional purposes. We may share personal information with law enforcement as required or permitted by law.
c
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
☑ |
Filed by the Registrant |
|
☐ |
Filed by a party other than the Registrant |
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
☐ |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
☑ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
☐ |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY):
☑ |
No fee required |
|
|
☐ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials |
|
|
☐ |
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
Notice of 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
Date and Time
Wednesday, May 7, 2025 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time |
|
|
Location
Exclusively online via webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/D2025 |
|
|
Record Date
February 28, 2025 |
Items of Business |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
VOTING |
||
|
The Board recommends a vote FOR the following Items: |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1: Election of the 11 director nominees named in this Proxy Statement Item 2: Advisory vote on approval of executive compensation (Say on Pay) Item 3: Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending December 31, 2025 |
|
|
Each share of Dominion Energy, Inc. (Dominion Energy, the company, we, our or us) common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the meeting. Please vote by proxy as soon as possible. Your vote is very important to us, and we want your shares to be represented at the meeting. |
||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
HOW TO VOTE |
|||
|
|
|
|
By Internet www.proxyvote.com/dominion
(before the meeting)
(during the meeting) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST the following Item: |
|
|
||
Item 4: Shareholder proposal – eliminating non-carbon emitting generation goals in executive pay incentives, if properly presented |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
By Telephone Call (800) 690-6903 if you are a registered shareholder or an employee 401(k) plan participant. If you are a beneficial owner, call the number provided by the bank or broker holding your shares. |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|||
Shareholders will also consider any other business properly presented at the meeting. More information about how to attend the meeting is under Questions and Answers About the 2025 Annual Meeting and Voting on page 85 .
|
|
||||
|
|
By Mail You can vote by mail by marking, dating and signing your proxy card or voting instruction form and returning it in the postage-paid envelope.
|
|||
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
This Notice of 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Notice) and accompanying proxy materials are being made available to shareholders electronically on or about March 28, 2025, or mailed on or about the same date to those shareholders who have previously requested printed materials. |
||
Carlos M. Brown President – Dominion Energy Services and Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary March 28, 2025 |
|
||||
|
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 7, 2025:
Dominion Energy’s Notice of Annual Meeting, 2025 Proxy Statement, 2024 Annual Report and 2024 Annual Report on
Form 10-K are available on our website at investors.dominionenergy.com/proxy.
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
||
|
|
5 |
||
|
|
9 |
||
|
|
10 |
||
|
|
22 |
||
|
|
22 |
||
|
|
23 |
||
|
|
24 |
||
|
|
25 |
||
|
|
26 |
||
|
|
27 |
||
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
35 |
||
|
|
37 |
||
|
|
38 |
||
|
|
38 |
||
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements contained in this Proxy Statement constitute “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. All statements other than statements of historical or current facts, including statements regarding future earnings and operations, our strategy, our environmental and other sustainability plans and goals and statements regarding ongoing and future projects and the expected availability and benefits of such projects, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our statements about the future are subject to various risks and uncertainties. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results, see the risks and uncertainties described throughout our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K) and particularly in Item 1A. Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Dominion Energy, and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion Energy Virginia or DEV) and Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc. (Dominion Energy South Carolina or DESC), assume no obligation to provide revisions or updates for any projections and forward-looking statements contained herein. |
|
|
Item 2: Advisory Vote on Approval of Executive Compensation (Say on Pay) |
39 |
|
|
40 |
||
|
|
40 |
||
|
|
40 |
||
|
|
43 |
||
|
|
45 |
||
|
|
59 |
||
|
|
61 |
||
|
|
63 |
||
|
|
64 |
||
|
|
76 |
||
|
|
76 |
||
|
|
77 |
||
|
|
79 |
||
|
|
79 |
||
|
|
79 |
||
|
|
80 |
||
|
|
81 |
||
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
84 |
|
|
|
Questions and Answers About the 2025 Annual Meeting and Voting |
85 |
|
|
|
90 |
||
|
|
Appendix A – Reconciliation of Reported Earnings (GAAP) to Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) |
A- 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominion Energy, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, provides regulated electricity service to 3.6 million homes and business in Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina, and regulated natural gas service to 500,000 customers in South Carolina. We are one of the nation's leading developers and operators of regulated offshore wind and solar power and the largest producer of carbon-free electricity in New England. Our mission is to provide the reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy that powers our customers every day.
1
|
|
Our Core Values |
|
Our core values are fundamental to who we are. We do what is right. We do it well. We do it together. Doing so helps ensure we maintain trust with those who matter most: our customers, investors, employees, communities, regulators and other stakeholders. Our customers rely on us to power their every day, so we deliver on our commitments. |
|
|
Safety – Our first and most important goal is to send every employee home safe and sound, every day. |
|
Ethics – We do not take shortcuts when reaching for our goals and fulfilling our obligations. Our reputation depends on ethical behavior. |
|
Excellence – We work toward continuous improvement in all areas of our business. |
|
Embrace Change – By welcoming new ideas, Dominion Energy champions innovation. Through innovation, we expect to prosper in the years ahead. |
|
One Dominion Energy – Our shared mission and purpose transcend organizational boundaries. Teamwork leads to strong, sustainable performance . |
2024 Financial Highlights |
||
$2.44 |
|
Reported earnings per share |
$2.77 |
|
Operating earnings per share 2 |
20.4% |
|
Total shareholder return in 2024 |
|
|
|
2024 Performance Highlights |
||
0.42 |
|
OSHA recordable injury rate, 75% better than industry average |
15 |
|
data centers with a combined capacity of nearly 1 GW connected to the grid in Virginia |
6.3% |
|
average peak annual load growth within our PJM Virginia delivery zone expected over the next decade |
3.9M |
|
smart meters installed through 2024, substantially completing our advanced metering initiative |
53% |
|
reduction in Scope 1 carbon dioxide emissions from 2005 through 2023 |
99.98% |
|
power availability, excluding major storms, in our Virginia and Carolinas service areas |
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 1
Our mission is to provide the reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy
|
Dominion Energy provides regulated electricity service to 3.6 million homes and business in Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina, and regulated natural gas service to 500,000 customers in South Carolina.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.3 GW of electric generating capacity |
|
|
|
|
|
10,600 miles of electric transmission lines |
|
|
|
|
|
79,700
miles of electric distribution
|
The company is one of the nation’s leading developers and operators of regulated offshore wind and solar power and the largest producer of carbon-free electricity in New England. |
|
|
of solar generation in service or under development as of the end of 2024 |
|
|
expected to be provided by the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) commercial project under construction |
|
|
of Connecticut’s carbon-free electricity provided by Millstone Power Station |
Based on available data as of February 27, 2025.
Dominion Energy. Powering Your Every Day.
2 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
We are energized by the opportunity to execute our mission and grow our business for the benefit of those we serve. Bob Blue | Chair, President and CEO |
Select Highlights
Looking back at 2024, we surpassed our companywide safety goal with near-record setting employee safety performance, we reached constructive regulatory outcomes in rate and rider cases that demonstrated our ability to work cooperatively with regulators and other stakeholders and we met our financial goals—earning $2.44 per share in reported earnings and $2.77 per share in operating earnings. 1 We also collectively reduced debt by approximately $21 billion by completing the remaining items from our business review, including:
With the work we have done since the beginning of 2024, we believe we have further positioned the company to provide compelling long-term value—all while providing our customers the superior service they have come to expect.
|
Continued our vigorous safety culture and achieved our second-best employee lost days or restricted duty rate ever |
|
|
Received regulatory approval to extend North Anna Power Station operating licenses for an additional 20 years to provide reliable, carbon-free power for another generation |
|
|
|
||
|
Received the last major federal approvals needed for construction of the CVOW commercial project and installed 78 out of 176 monopiles |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Announced a joint planning agreement with affiliates of American Electric Power Company, Inc. and FirstEnergy Corp. for several new regional electric transmission projects across multiple states within the PJM Interconnection footprint |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Began sea trials for Charybdis —our Jones Act-compliant installation vessel to support the CVOW commercial project— in early 2025 |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Provided reliable service to our customers—ensuring power availability 99.98% of the time, excluding major storms, in the company’s Virginia and Carolinas service areas |
|
Obtained approvals for more than a dozen new solar projects in Virginia with a generating capacity of 764 MWs |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued a request for proposals to leading small modular reactor (SMR) developers and signed a memorandum of understanding with Amazon to explore innovative development structures and help advance SMRs in Virginia |
|
|
Kept our rates affordable for our customers at 18% below the national average in Virginia and 13% below the national average in South Carolina |
|
|
|
||
|
|
$2.1B invested in electric transmission in 2024 by Dominion Energy Virginia |
||
|
|
|
||
|
110,000+ hours volunteered by our employees and retirees in 2024 |
|
1 See Reconciliation of Reported Earnings (GAAP) to Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) in Appendix A.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 3
Human Capital Management
Every day we depend on our approximately 14,700 1 Dominion Energy colleagues to provide reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy. To sustain that valuable workforce, we focus on attracting talent, developing our employees and future leaders and providing an environment that is safe and supportive.
|
Safety
•
Our focus on safety starts at the top with our Board, which receives a report on the company’s safety performance at every regularly scheduled Board meeting.
•
We foster a safety conscious culture among our employees by including a safety performance measure in the annual incentive plans for all employees.
2
|
|
Attracting, Retaining and Developing Talent
•
We attract and retain employees by offering competitive compensation and benefits packages, including healthcare, retirement, paid time off, parental leave and other benefits.
•
We develop talent through learning opportunities, including tuition assistance programs, professional development resources and leadership development programs.
•
We sponsor nine employee resource groups enabling employees to work together to create community and promote excellent performance.
•
We are an equal opportunity employer committed to non-discrimination in all operations and periodically review our workforce representation to ensure we are casting a wide net for the best and brightest talent.
|
|
Employee Feedback
•
We create opportunities for our employees to engage with leaders and each other through respectful two‑way conversations that help employees and leaders learn from one another, share insights and opinions and broaden their perspectives regarding what matters to customers.
•
We prioritize employee engagement and routinely seek feedback through surveys, focus groups and other means. The feedback informs management decisions, enhances support for employees and improves customer service.
•
Our Board reviews the results from our companywide engagement surveys and the action plans that are developed in response to feedback from the surveys.
|
Awards and Recognitions
Our dedication to excellence in innovation, leadership and workplace engagement is regularly recognized.
America’s Greatest Workplaces
★★★★
½
|
Top Utility for Economic Development
|
Best Practices Award
|
Workforce
|
Military Friendly Employer
|
Top 25 Veteran Employers for 2025
|
Best of the Best
U.S. Veterans Magazine
|
Top Innovative Practice Award
Nuclear Energy Institute
|
1 As of December 31, 2024.
2 Except when restricted by any collective bargaining agreements.
4 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1 |
Election of Directors You are being asked to vote on the election of 11 director nominees. Additional information about each director’s background, business experience and qualifications appears under the heading Item 1 – Election of Directors beginning on page 9. |
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each director nominee. |
|
|
|
V oting Roadmap
Experience of our Director Nominees |
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS |
|
|
COMPOSITION OF OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry |
|
|
Board Composition and Independence · All independent directors except for Board Chair · Independent Lead Director with clearly defined role and responsibilities · 100% independent Board committees · Independent directors meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled Board meeting Robust Shareholder Rights · Annual election of all directors · Majority voting standard for uncontested elections of directors with a resignation policy for directors who fail to receive majority support · Ability for shareholders to call a special shareholder meeting · Ability for shareholders to nominate directors through proxy access Board and Committee Governance Practices · Refreshed committee structure and membership in 2024 following a holistic review · Regular Board refreshment, including two new directors added in 2023, and a resignation policy for directors who reach the age of 75 · Annual Board and committee evaluations, including individual director interviews led by the independent Lead Director · Robust director and executive share ownership guidelines |
|
|
7.7 Average Years Tenure
62.4 Average Age
1 As of March 1, 2025. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Government, Public Policy or Legal |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Human Capital/Talent Management |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Innovation and Technology |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Environmental |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Customer and Community |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Leadership |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Financial or Accounting |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Corporate Governance |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 5
Nominees for the Board of Directors
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Bennett
INDEPENDENT
Age: 63 Director Since: 2019
Executive Director of External Affairs,
|
Robert M. Blue
CHAIR, PRESIDENT AND CEO,
Age: 57 Director Since: 2020 |
Paul M. Dabbar
INDEPENDENT
Age: 57
Director Since:
2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Maybank Hagood
INDEPENDENT
Age: 63
Director Since:
2019
|
Mark J. Kington
INDEPENDENT
Age: 65
Director Since:
2005
|
Kristin G. Lovejoy
INDEPENDENT
Age: 58 Director Since: 2022
Global Security and Resilience Practice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph M. Rigby
INDEPENDENT
Age: 68 Director Since: 2017
Retired Chairman, President and CEO,
|
Pamela J. Royal, M.D.
INDEPENDENT
Age: 62
Director Since:
2013
|
Robert H. Spilman, Jr.
INDEPENDENT
Age: 68
Director Since:
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan N. Story
INDEPENDENT LEAD DIRECTOR
Age: 65
Director Since:
2017
|
Vanessa Allen Sutherland
INDEPENDENT
Age: 53
Director Since:
2023
|
|
Ages as of March 1, 2025
6 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
|
ITEM 2 |
Advisory Vote on Approval of Executive Compensation (Say on Pay)
You are being asked to vote on an advisory basis on the compensation paid to the company’s named executive officers (NEOs) as described in Item 2 of this Proxy Statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), compensation tables and narrative discussion, beginning on page 39. |
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this item. |
Compensation BEST PRACTICES
What We Do |
|
Compensation Snapshot The charts below illustrate the components of the annualized target total direct compensation opportunities provided to our CEO and target total direct compensation opportunities provided to the other NEOs in 2024:
|
|
|
Place a substantial portion of NEO pay at risk and tied to enhanced shareholder value |
|
|
|
Balance short-term and long-term incentives |
|
|
|
Require significant stock ownership for our CEO, other NEOs and all other officers |
|
|
|
Tie equity and cash-based incentive compensation to a clawback policy |
|
|
|
Consider shareholder feedback, including results of prior year’s Say on Pay vote |
|
|
What We Don’t Do |
|
||
|
Offer long-term or indefinite employment agreements to our executive officers |
|
|
|
Permit officers to hedge or pledge shares of our common stock |
|
|
|
Offer excessive perquisites or provide tax gross-ups on executive perquisites, except for certain benefits provided through the company’s relocation program |
|
|
|
Offer excessive change in control severance benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 2024, our CEO’s long-term incentive awards were 100% performance-based, with 93% of the payout based on our relative total shareholder return or cumulative operating earnings per share. We believe this creates strong alignment with our shareholders and reinforces our pay-for-performance culture. |
|
||
|
|
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 7
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3 |
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor
The Audit Committee appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte) as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm (independent auditor) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the retention of Deloitte to continue serving as the company’s independent auditor is in the best interests of Dominion Energy and its shareholders. You are being asked to ratify the appointment of Deloitte as the company’s independent auditor for fiscal year 2025. Additional details about the Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte as the company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year 2025, as well as the fees paid to Deloitte in 2024 and 2023, can be found beginning on page 79. |
|
|
|
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this item. |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4 |
Shareholder Proposal You are being asked to vote on a shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the 2025 Annual Meeting, regarding a request to consider eliminating non-carbon emitting generation goals in executive pay incentives. Details of the proposal, as well as the company’s opposing statement, can be found beginning on page 81. |
|
|
|
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST this item. |
8 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
ITE M 1 |
Election of Directors You are being asked to vote on the election of the following 11 director nominees. Information about each director’s background, business experience and qualifications is provided on the following pages. |
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each director nominee. |
|
|
|
Our Board of Directors, based on the recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee (NGS Committee), has nominated 11 directors for election at the 2025 Annual Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting and until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified. All nominees are currently directors and all directors were elected by shareholders at the 2024 Annual Meeting.
Each nominee has agreed to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve as director for another term, if elected. For additional information regarding the voting requirements to elect directors, see What are the voting requirements to elect the directors and to approve each of the other items in this Proxy Statement and what is the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes? on page 86 .
The nominees are 11 current and former leaders from organizations in the utilities, technology, financial services, medical, manufacturing, political and governmental sectors. Many of the nominees serve or have served on other public company boards, enabling our Board to stay apprised of best practices implemented at other companies and promoting informed and effective governance. In these leadership and oversight roles, we believe they have exemplified the integrity and acumen necessary to monitor and appraise management’s strategy and the company’s operations. Most nominees have roots in our communities, providing valuable feedback and insight into the impacts of Board decisions on customers, and all nominees have unique perspectives informed by their experiences and backgrounds. As a group of experienced, collegial, thoughtful, responsible and intelligent leaders, we believe they provide quality advice and counsel to Dominion Energy’s management and effectively oversee the business and long-term interests of shareholders. |
|
6 NEW DIRECTORS added since 2019, including two in 2023 NEWLY-ELECTED INDEPENDENT LEAD DIRECTOR
in 2024,
perspectives to the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
The Board evaluates and vets candidates for election as directors as part of its normal course of business as described under Director Nominations and Board Refreshment on page 22 . Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of individuals than the number of nominees. Although it is not anticipated that any of the individuals named below will be unable or unwilling to stand for election, in the event of such an occurrence, a proxy may be voted for a substitute designated by our Board, or in lieu of designating a substitute, our Board may reduce the number of directors.
Voting Standard :
Majority of
for each director in
|
Director Elections : Annual |
Committee Structure: Refreshed in 2024 |
Board and Committee Evaluations: Annual including individual director interviews led by the independent Lead Director |
Leadership Structure : CEO/Chair and Independent Lead Director with 100% independent committees |
Non-Employee Director Ownership Guidelines:
Lesser of 12,000 shares or
|
Retirement Policy : 75 years old Independent directors must submit a resignation for consideration by December 31st after they turn 75 |
Shareholder Rights: Proxy Access and Special Meeting Rights for qualified shareholders |
1 Shares equal in value to five times the annual cash and stock retainers combined.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 9
Director Nominees
The Board attribute matrix below highlights the mix of key skills, qualifications, attributes and experiences that each director nominee brings to our Board. Nominees developed competencies in these skills through education, direct experience and oversight responsibilities. The Board believes that Dominion Energy directors should possess these skills, qualifications, attributes and experiences to provide oversight in line with our mission, core values and strategic plans. Because the matrix is a summary, it is not intended to be a complete description of all the key skills, qualifications, attributes and experiences of each director.
|
Skills, Qualifications, Attributes and Experiences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry. Experience in utility, energy and/or nuclear energy operations, including the associated risks and public policy issues. |
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
● |
|
|
● |
● |
Government, Public Policy or Legal. Experience working with governmental agencies and advancing policy and legislative initiatives. |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
|
|
● |
● |
|
Human Capital/Talent Management. Experience in attracting, developing, motivating and retaining a talented workforce. |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
Innovation and Technology. Experience overseeing or driving technological trends, digital platforms, cybersecurity and development of new technologies. |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
Environmental. Experience overseeing or managing environmental, climate or sustainability practices, with an understanding of environmental policy, risks, regulations and compliance obligations. |
|
● |
● |
|
|
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
|
Customer and Community. Experience in a customer-facing industry with an understanding of customer and community expectations, including transforming the customer experience. |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
|
Leadership. CEO, executive or senior management experience guiding complex organizations, including developing and implementing corporate strategies and long-term business plans. |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Financial or Accounting. Experience in finance or accounting, including oversight of financial reporting and internal controls and/or raising debt and equity capital. |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
Corporate Governance. Experience with board oversight and management accountability, as well as protecting shareholder and stakeholder interests. |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
Risk Management. Experience overseeing or managing financial, operational and other significant risks that affect our business. |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
|
Independent |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Tenure (# of years as of March 1, 2025) |
6 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
19 |
2 |
8 |
12 |
15 |
8 |
1 |
|
Age (as of March 1, 2025) |
63 |
57 |
57 |
63 |
65 |
58 |
68 |
62 |
68 |
65 |
53 |
|
Female |
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
● |
|
Male |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
|
|
African American or Black |
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
White or Caucasian |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
|
Information about each director nominee is presented on the following pages, including specific key experience and qualifications that led the NGS Committee and our Board to nominate him or her to serve as a director.
10 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
James A. Bennett
|
|
|
Age: 63 Director Since: 2019 Independent |
Committees: Finance Safety, Technology, Nuclear and Operations (Chair) |
|
Experience
Mr. Bennett has served as Executive Director of External Affairs for First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company (First Citizens) in Columbia, South Carolina since January 2024, having previously served as South Region Mid-South Area Executive from January 2015 to January 2024, in addition to other leadership roles with First Citizens. Before joining First Citizens, Mr. Bennett became the youngest bank president in South Carolina when he was named President of Victory Savings Bank in 1989.
Mr. Bennett has been actively involved with the Columbia Urban League for more than 35 years, serving previously as League Chairman, and is a former chairman of the board of Claflin University, a private, historically black university located in Orangeburg, South Carolina. Mr. Bennett currently serves on the Executive Committee of the Midlands Business Leadership Group and as a member of the University of South Carolina Educational Foundation and Development Foundation. He is a member of the board of directors of Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina and former chair of the South Carolina Bankers Association.
Mr. Bennett received his undergraduate degree from the University of South Carolina and is a graduate of the South Carolina Bankers School.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Mr. Bennett has extensive leadership and talent management skills from his management and operating responsibilities in the banking industry, which helps our Board with strategic planning and with its oversight of the company’s efforts to develop and retain a talented workforce.
He has financial and risk management expertise and familiarity with public policy and customer service concerns from his work in the regulated financial services sector, developing the skills needed to oversee the company’s financial needs and risk management.
He has demonstrated a commitment to the community and non-profit organizations within South Carolina, fostering connections with our customers.
Through his tenure on the board of directors of SCANA Corporation (SCANA), Mr. Bennett has relevant corporate governance and public company board experience, assisting our Board with transparency, accountability and effectiveness.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 11
|
Robert M. Blue
|
|
Age: 57 Director Since: 2020 Chair, President and Chief Executive Officer, Dominion Energy
|
Experience
Mr. Blue has served as Chair of the Board of Dominion Energy since April 2021 and as President and Chief Executive Officer since October 2020, having previously served as Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Operating Officer from December 2019 through September 2020. He served as Executive Vice President and President & Chief Executive Officer – Power Delivery Group from May 2017 through November 2019, and in various Senior Vice President roles prior to that. Mr. Blue has also served as a director for Dominion Energy Virginia and Dominion Energy South Carolina, both wholly-owned operating subsidiaries of Dominion Energy, since November 2018 and October 2020, respectively.
Prior to joining Dominion Energy in 2005, Mr. Blue served as Counselor and Director of Policy for the Governor of Virginia.
Mr. Blue currently serves on the boards of the Nuclear Energy Institute, the Edison Electric Institute and the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. He is a member of the boards of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited, the Greater Washington Partnership, Sports Backers and Communities in Schools of Virginia, as well as a member of the University of Virginia’s Board of Visitors.
Mr. Blue received his undergraduate degree and Master of Business Administration from the University of Virginia and his law degree from Yale University.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Mr. Blue has in-depth knowledge of the company’s industry, business and operations, with more than 19 years of experience at Dominion Energy.
He has oversight experience of cybersecurity and technological trends, which is key in providing reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy to our customers.
As Dominion Energy’s Chair, President and CEO, Mr. Blue has demonstrated his leadership, financial, risk management, talent management and corporate governance skills in leading the company through the execution of its strategic business review.
He possesses an understanding of the environmental, regulatory, operational, legal, governmental and public policy issues central to our core utility businesses, helping the company monitor and advocate for policy and legislative initiatives that protect our industry and our customers.
He has demonstrated a commitment to the communities we serve, fostering connections with our customers and other stakeholders.
12 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Paul M. Dabbar
|
|
|
Age: 57 Director Since: 2023 Independent |
Committees: Finance Safety, Technology, Nuclear and Operations |
|
Experience
Mr. Dabbar is a Co-founder of Bohr Quantum Technology Corp. (Bohr), which develops and deploys quantum information technologies for the emerging quantum internet, and served as the Chief Executive Officer of Bohr from 2021 to 2025. Previously, he was Under Secretary of Energy for Science for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) from 2017 to 2021. Prior to his role at the DOE, Mr. Dabbar was a senior investment banker at J.P. Morgan with significant transaction experience across all energy sectors. In addition, he had a senior leadership role for J.P. Morgan’s commodity trading business, including power, oil and gas. Mr. Dabbar also served as a U.S. Navy officer aboard the nuclear submarine, USS Pintado .
He is a member of the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations and served on the DOE’s Research and Technology Investment Committee and the boards of the National Science and Technology Council, the Manhattan Project National Park, the Energy Storage Grand Challenge and the DOE’s Environmental Management Board. He is also a Senior Research Scholar at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy.
Mr. Dabbar received his undergraduate degree from the U.S. Naval Academy and his Master of Business Administration from Columbia University and is a graduate of the U.S. Navy’s Nuclear Power and Engineer programs.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Mr. Dabbar has substantial technology and innovation experience from his role with Bohr, assisting our Board with its oversight of the company’s efforts to ensure the security of the electric grid and prevent interruptions in service due to cyberattacks.
He has environmental and industry experience from his work in the energy sector with particular expertise in nuclear operations, a fundamental component of meeting our Net Zero commitment.
In addition, Mr. Dabbar has leadership, talent management, customer and corporate governance experience from serving as CEO of a private technology company and on the boards of AirJoule Technologies Corporation and Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition company, assisting our Board with transparency, accountability and effectiveness.
He has financial and risk management experience from his time in investment banking, which helps our Board with its oversight of the company’s strategies to meet its financial targets and navigate the financial and energy markets.
He possesses legal, government and public policy experience from his roles with the U.S. government, helping our Board’s oversight of policy and legislative initiatives.
Public Company Board Experience Within the Past Five Years
• AirJoule Technologies Corporation (formerly Montana Technologies Corporation and Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition II Corp.) (since 2022) |
|
• Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. (2021-2022) |
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 13
|
D. Maybank Hagood
|
|
|
Age: 63 Director Since: 2019 Independent |
Committees: Finance Nominating, Governance and Sustainability |
Experience
Mr. Hagood has served as Chief Executive Officer of Southern Diversified Distributors, Inc. (SDD) since 2003 and as Chairman since 2012. SDD is the parent company of William M. Bird and Company, Inc. and TranSouth Logistics, LLC, providers of floor covering distribution and supplies, warehousing, logistics and transportation throughout the Southeast.
Mr. Hagood chairs the board of directors of the Lamb Institute, a non-profit organization based in Charleston, South Carolina. The Lamb Institute funds several ministries in Honduras providing funding, volunteer resources and support to schools, an orphanage and various other programs. He also serves on the board of Bravo Services, LLC, a consortium of 12 North American flooring companies representing over $2 billion in annual sales of floor covering and related supply products.
Mr. Hagood received both his undergraduate degree and Master of Business Administration from the University of Virginia.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Mr. Hagood brings leadership, talent management, risk management and financial operations skills from his role as the CEO of SDD, which helps our Board with strategic planning, its oversight of the company’s efforts to develop and retain a talented workforce and overseeing financial reporting and internal controls.
In his role as CEO of SDD, Mr. Hagood is responsible for overseeing its corporate information technology systems and strategy, customer service operations, supply chain management and marketing as well as addressing changing consumer preferences, which increases our Board’s understanding of cybersecurity issues as well as customer and community expectations.
Through his tenure as a member of the board of directors of SCANA, Mr. Hagood also brings relevant corporate governance and public company board experience, assisting our Board with transparency, accountability and effectiveness.
14 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Mark J. Kington
|
|
|
Age: 65 Director Since: 2005 Independent |
Committees: Compensation and Talent Development Finance (Chair) |
|
Experience
Mr. Kington has been managing director of Kington Management, LP, a private investment firm, and its predecessor since 2012. He was managing director of X-10 Capital Management, LLC, a private investment firm, from 2004 to 2012.
Mr. Kington is and has been the principal officer and investor in several communications firms and was a founding member of Columbia Capital, LLC, a venture capital firm specializing in the communications and information technology industries.
He currently serves on the board of the University of Virginia Darden School Foundation. He has also served on the boards of Colonial Williamsburg, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Nature Conservancy in Virginia and the NPR Foundation.
Mr. Kington received his undergraduate degree from the University of Tennessee and Master of Business Administration from the University of Virginia.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Mr. Kington has extensive experience in information technology, investment management and corporate finance, including derivatives and capital markets, which is valuable as the Chair of the Finance Committee and helps our Board oversee the company’s financial performance, as well as navigate the energy and financial markets.
He also has regulatory and governmental expertise acquired during his tenure in the highly regulated telecommunications industry, helping our Board oversee policies and legislative initiatives.
Through his service as a managing director, Mr. Kington brings leadership, talent management, corporate governance and risk management experience, assisting our Board with its oversight of the company’s efforts to develop and retain a talented workforce and overseeing the company’s financial needs and risks.
Mr. Kington also has demonstrated a commitment to community and non-profit organizations within Virginia, fostering connections with our customers and other stakeholders.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 15
|
Kristin G. Lovejoy
|
|
|
Age: 58 Director Since: 2022 Independent |
Committees: Audit Safety, Technology, Nuclear and Operations |
Experience
Ms. Lovejoy has been Global Security and Resilience Practice Leader for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (Kyndryl), a multinational, New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listed information technology infrastructure services company, since November 2021.
Prior to joining Kyndryl, Ms. Lovejoy served as Global Cybersecurity Leader for Ernst & Young from February 2019 to November 2021, and was the founder and Chief Executive Officer of BluVector Inc. (BluVector), an AI-powered, sense-and-respond platform, from January 2017 through January 2019. Prior to that, she held senior positions at IBM, serving as Global Chief Information Security Officer and General Manager of the company’s Security Services Division, and was charged with building end-to-end security programs for IBM’s global clients.
Ms. Lovejoy holds U.S. and EU patents in areas around risk management and was named The Consulting Report’s “Top Cybersecurity Leader of 2021,” and one of the “Top 10 Guardians of Cyberspace” by The Cyber Express in 2022.
She currently serves as a director of Radiant Logic and as a technology mentor for the Columbia University Center for Technology Management.
Ms. Lovejoy received her undergraduate degree from Lafayette College.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Ms. Lovejoy is a recognized thought leader in the fields of technology, risk management, resilience, compliance and governance. Ms. Lovejoy’s cybersecurity experience is invaluable to a utility company such as Dominion Energy, which must maintain the security of the electric grid and prevent interruptions in service due to cyberattacks.
Ms. Lovejoy brings innovation and technological experience as her other roles require her to stay abreast of developing technology and public policy trends, including cyber tactics, strategies, best practices and issue resolution.
Ms. Lovejoy also has leadership, talent management, environmental, financial and risk management experience acquired through her senior roles at Kyndryl and IBM, and as founder and CEO of BluVector, assisting our Board with reviewing the company’s efforts to develop and retain a talented workforce and overseeing financial reporting and internal controls.
16 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Joseph M. Rigby
|
|
|
Age: 68 Director Since: 2017 Independent |
Committees: Audit (Chair) Compensation and Talent Development Safety, Technology, Nuclear and Operations |
|
Experience
Mr. Rigby served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pepco Holdings, Inc. (PHI), an energy delivery company serving the mid-Atlantic region, from May 2009 to March 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Rigby held other executive officer positions with PHI and its subsidiaries, including chief operating officer and chief financial officer. He served as non-executive Chairman of South Jersey Industries, Inc. (South Jersey), an energy delivery company headquartered in Folsom, New Jersey, from 2020 to February 2025, including through South Jersey’s private acquisition in 2023.
The New Jersey Chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors recognized Mr. Rigby with the Lifetime Achievement in Governance award in 2024.
Mr. Rigby served on the boards of the Edison Electric Institute, U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Rutgers University Advisory Board, among others.
He received his undergraduate degree in accounting from Rutgers University and a Master of Business Administration from Monmouth University and was a Certified Public Accountant.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Mr. Rigby has extensive utility industry expertise, with in-depth knowledge of electric transmission and distribution operations and their environmental impact, acquired through more than 37 years of service with PHI and its subsidiaries.
From his role as CEO of PHI, he brings leadership, risk management, governmental, customer experience, talent management and finance skills, among other business disciplines. Mr. Rigby has expertise in mergers and acquisitions and was integrally involved in the merger of PHI with Exelon.
As CEO of PHI, Mr. Rigby has direct experience advancing policy and legislative initiatives, including with respect to rate case proceedings.
Mr. Rigby also provides financial and accounting expertise from his service as the CFO of PHI and his utility accounting background.
Through his tenure on the boards of PHI and South Jersey, Mr. Rigby has extensive experience with public company corporate governance requirements, assisting our Board with transparency, accountability and effectiveness.
Public Company Board Experience Within the Past Five Years
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 17
|
Pamela J. Royal, M.D.
|
|
|
Age: 62 Director Since: 2013 Independent |
Committees: Audit Nominating, Governance and Sustainability (Chair) |
Experience
Dr. Royal has been the owner and President of Royal Dermatology and Aesthetic Skin Care, Inc. since 1990. She is also a practicing physician.
Dr. Royal currently serves on the boards of The Valentine Museum (former chair), the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts (fiscal oversight committee chair) and the YMCA of Greater Richmond. She previously served on numerous other boards, including the local Advisory Board of Truist Bank, The Community Foundation (former chair), the Executive Committee of Venture Richmond (secretary), Bon Secours Richmond Health System, St. Christopher’s School, the United Way of Greater Richmond and Petersburg (former chair), CenterStage Foundation (former vice chair), the Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce, J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College Foundation and the Virginia Early Childhood Foundation.
Dr. Royal received her undergraduate degree from Hampton University and her medical degree from Eastern Virginia Medical School.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Dr. Royal provides leadership, management and analytical skills to our Board as a recognized leader in the business and civic community and as president of her own medical practice in her native Richmond, Virginia, where the company is headquartered.
She also brings broad experience with financial, risk management and regulatory matters, including privacy and cybersecurity technology and insurance expertise, developed through her experience running a successful business for over 30 years in the highly regulated medical industry.
Dr. Royal also has corporate governance oversight, talent management and management accountability experience through running her own business, leadership roles of numerous non-profit boards and her service on our Board.
As a business owner familiar with the local economies and the communities we serve, Dr. Royal represents a unique customer centric view on our Board and understands the critical importance of meeting customer, community and other stakeholder expectations and the value of maintaining and building our brand and reputation.
18 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Robert H. Spilman, Jr.
|
|
|
Age: 68 Director Since: 2009 Independent |
Committees: Compensation and Talent Development (Chair) Nominating, Governance and Sustainability |
|
Experience
Mr. Spilman has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (Bassett), a NASDAQ listed furniture manufacturer and distributor, since 2000. He has also served as Chairman of the Board of Bassett since 2016 and served as our independent Lead Director from 2020 to 2024.
Mr. Spilman serves on the Virginia Foundation for Independent Colleges and previously was Chairman of the Board of Directors of New College Institute. He served as a director of Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. (Harris Teeter) from 2002 to 2014, including as lead director from 2012 to 2014.
Mr. Spilman received his undergraduate degree from Vanderbilt University.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Mr. Spilman has knowledge of and expertise in customer expectations, brand management, product development and competitive consumer markets as CEO of a publicly traded national retailer, manufacturer and marketer of branded home furnishings.
He is familiar with talent management, information technology and environmental impact concerns associated with manufacturing and retail operations including e-commerce. Mr. Spilman provides financial, risk management, leadership and investor relations skills from his experience as the current CEO and Chair of a public company.
He also brings public company board and corporate governance experience as a former lead director of Harris Teeter and current Chairman of the Board of Bassett. This experience includes transparency, accountability and board effectiveness.
Public Company Board Experience Within the Past Five Years
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 19
|
Susan N. Story
|
|
|
Age: 65 Director Since: 2017
Independent
|
Committees: Compensation and Talent Development Safety, Technology, Nuclear and Operations |
Experience
Ms. Story served as President and Chief Executive Officer of American Water Works Company, Inc. (American Water), an NYSE listed company, from May 2014 to April 2020, after joining American Water as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 2013.
Prior to American Water, Ms. Story served as Executive Vice President of Southern Company (Southern), an NYSE listed electric power generation, transmission and distribution company, from 2003 through 2013, and in other executive positions with subsidiaries of Southern, including President and CEO of Southern Company Services from January 2011 to April 2013 and President of Gulf Power Company from April 2003 through December 2010.
Ms. Story serves or has served on a number of boards, including the Bipartisan Policy Center, the NYSE Board Advisory Council, the Council of CEOs, the Moffitt Cancer Center Advisory Board, the Alliance to Save Energy and the Electric Power Research Institute Advisory Council.
Ms. Story received her undergraduate degree in Industrial Engineering from Auburn University and her Master of Business Administration from the University of Alabama.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Ms. Story brings leadership, operations, strategic planning, environmental, technology, cybersecurity and financial and risk management experience from her service as the President and CEO and the CFO of an S&P 500 publicly traded, regulated utility.
She developed extensive industry experience during her career at Southern and then American Water, including her tenure as President of Gulf Power Company, where she addressed many issues also faced by Dominion Energy, including government and public policy issues, talent management, customer experience, nuclear operations, cybersecurity threats, regulatory compliance requirements, changing workforce demographics, strategic workforce planning and insurance management.
As former lead director of Raymond James Financial, Inc. (Raymond James) and director of American Water and as a current board member of Newmont Corporation and Carrier Global Corporation, Ms. Story has significant experience with public company corporate governance requirements, including transparency, accountability and board effectiveness.
Public Company Board Experience Within the Past Five Years
• Carrier Global Corporation (since 2023) |
|
• American Water Works Company, Inc. (2014-2020) |
• Newmont Corporation (since 2020) |
|
• Raymond James Financial, Inc. (2008-2023) |
20 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Vanessa Allen Sutherland
|
|
|
Age: 53 Director Since: 2023 Independent |
Committees: Audit Nominating, Governance and Sustainability |
|
Experience
Ms. Sutherland has served as Executive Vice President, Government Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Phillips 66 Company (Phillips 66), a Fortune 50 diversified energy manufacturing and logistics company, since February 2022. Prior to her role at Phillips 66, Ms. Sutherland was Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer for Norfolk Southern Corporation (Norfolk Southern), a rail transportation and logistics company, from March 2020 through January 2022, having previously served in other executive roles with Norfolk Southern from June 2018 to March 2020. She also previously served in senior legal counsel roles for Altria Group, Inc. and Digex, Inc.
In addition, Ms. Sutherland served as Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board from 2015 to 2018 and as Chief Counsel at the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. She serves on the Virginia Symphony Orchestra Board in Norfolk, Virginia, and served as a member of the Board of Trustees of The Woodruff Arts Center in Atlanta, Georgia.
Ms. Sutherland received her undergraduate degree from Drew University and her law degree and Master of Business Administration from American University.
Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Ms. Sutherland has industry, environmental, leadership, financial, customer and talent management experience from her governmental roles and service as a chief legal officer for a Fortune 50 energy company, assisting our Board’s oversight of the company’s strategies that address energy, environmental and workforce matters.
She has in-depth risk management, legal and corporate governance knowledge from serving in legal roles in the energy industry, assisting our Board’s oversight of risk while increasing transparency, accountability and effectiveness.
Ms. Sutherland brings substantial knowledge of government and public policy matters from her roles with the U.S. government, assisting our Board’s oversight of the company’s policy and legislative initiatives.
Ms. Sutherland provides technology expertise as a Certified Information Privacy Professional, assisting our Board’s oversight of the company’s efforts to ensure the security of the electric grid and prevent interruptions in service due to cyberattacks.
She has demonstrated a commitment to the Virginia community, fostering connections with our customers.
Public Company Board Experience Within the Past Five Years
• Southern Company Gas, a subsidiary of Southern Company (2021-2023) |
|
• Eastman Chemical Corporation (2021) |
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 21
Co rporate Governance
Director Nomi nations and Board Refreshment The NGS Committee is responsible for assessing the size and composition of our Board, determining whether its composition is appropriate for the company’s current and future strategic needs and identifying, evaluating and recommending nominees for election to the Board. As part of its assessment of the size and composition of the Board, the NGS Committee considers a variety of factors, including:
•
Feedback on attributes and performance through Board assessments and executive session discussions;
•
The existing and desired skills and experiences that would be beneficial to our Board and its committees;
•
The results of the Board’s evaluation process and identified areas of expertise of current directors;
•
Changes in our business strategy and operating environment;
•
Tenure of current Board members, with the goal of striking a balance between the knowledge, continuity and other benefits that longer-tenured directors provide to the Board with the fresh experience, insights and perspectives that new directors contribute; and
•
Anticipated director retirements.
When identifying potential nominees, the NGS Committee considers candidates recommended by current members of the Board, members of management or shareholders, as well as any other well-qualified candidates who may come to the NGS Committee’s attention. At times, the NGS Committee also uses an independent, third-party search firm to assist with ongoing identification and vetting of potential candidates. In evaluating a director candidate, the NGS Committee considers, among other things:
•
The candidate’s business or other relevant experience;
•
Whether the candidate’s skills and competencies align with the company’s strategic opportunities and challenges;
•
The candidate’s character, judgment, diversity of experience, business acumen and ability to act on behalf of shareholders;
•
The interplay of the candidate’s expertise, skills, knowledge and experience in comparison to other members of our Board; and
•
The candidate’s ability to dedicate sufficient time and energy to contribute to the effectiveness of the Board.
|
|
BOARD REFRESHMENT PROCESS
|
||
|
1
|
|
Board composition, including current and future needs, is regularly analyzed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Candidate list is developed and refreshed, including any candidates recommended by directors, management and shareholders |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Personal qualities, skills and background of potential candidates are considered. Candidates are screened for independence and potential conflicts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
NGS Committee evaluates candidates and recommends nominees to the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Board evaluates the candidates, analyzes independence and potential conflicts and selects nominees |
|
|
|
|
Once a potential candidate is identified, the NGS Committee reviews the background of the candidate for potential conflicts and to determine whether the candidate would be independent under the independence standards of Dominion Energy and the NYSE. The Board then typically meets with the candidate in small and large groups of directors and in informal and formal settings to allow for personal interaction and assessment. Both the NGS Committee and the Board meet in executive sessions to discuss the qualifications of the director candidate before the NGS Committee makes a final recommendation to the Board.
As required by the company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the NGS Committee is charged with selecting candidates who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions as well as those of its five committees. The NGS Committee recognizes that a Board with different skills, experiences and perspectives helps encourage critical thinking and innovative, strategic discussions, which in turn contributes to the continued success of the company. Representation of different perspectives promotes the Board’s understanding of the needs and viewpoints of our investors, customers, employees, suppliers, communities and other stakeholders.
22 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Shareholder Director Candidate Recommendations
Any shareholder wishing to recommend a director candidate for consideration by the NGS Committee should send a written statement to the Corporate Secretary, identifying the candidate and providing relevant qualifications and biographical information. The Corporate Secretary may require the candidate to provide additional information necessary for the Board to evaluate the candidate. Shareholder recommendations are reviewed on the same basis as candidates identified by or recommended to the NGS Committee.
Shareholder-Nominated Director Candidates
Dominion Energy’s Bylaws allow a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning collectively 3% or more of the company’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least the previous three years, to nominate and include in the company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of 20% of the Board or two nominees provided that such shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements set forth in Article XII of our Bylaws.
Our Bylaws also allow a shareholder to nominate persons for election as directors provided that the shareholder satisfies the requirements specified in Article XI of our Bylaws.
For additional information, see Business Proposals and Nominations by Shareholders on page 91 .
B oard and Committee Evaluations
Our Board conducts an annual evaluation designed to enhance its effectiveness and performance. Our Lead Director, together with the NGS Committee, oversees the Board’s annual evaluation process, including review of overall Board performance, the Board’s understanding of the company’s core businesses and strategy, Board and committee responsibilities, CEO and senior management succession planning, the flow of information from management and Board meeting agenda topics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRES Anonymous submission of evaluation questionnaires allows candid input by each director regarding the performance and effectiveness of the Board. |
|
INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR INTERVIEW
Independent Lead Director has in-depth discussions with each independent director to gather suggestions for improving Board effectiveness and to solicit input
|
|
|
FEEDBACK INCORPORATED The Board and each of its committees develop plans to act based on the results, as appropriate. Dialogue continues throughout the year regarding any identified focus item and any new topics that may arise. Board policies and practices are updated as appropriate as a result of feedback provided. |
BOARD DISCUSSION Responses from Board questionnaires and
insights from the independent Lead Director interviews are discussed in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each Board committee also conducts an annual evaluation of its effectiveness and performance. Each committee member anonymously completes a written questionnaire soliciting feedback on topics such as committee size, member expertise, responsibilities, meeting materials provided by management and performance. A compilation of the responses is reviewed and discussed by each committee in executive session and a summary of all committee assessment results is provided to the NGS Committee for its review and discussion. During 2024, the Board revised the timing of the evaluations process to spread out the review of Board and committee performance, providing directors more time to provide feedback. The NGS Committee subsequently reviewed the effectiveness of the revised evaluation process and will continue to evaluate the expanded time frame.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 23
D irector Independence
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards require that the Board be composed of a majority of independent directors. To assist in assessing director independence, the Board adopted independence standards that also meet the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards. In applying our independence standards and applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and NYSE criteria, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances.
Our independence analysis also identifies certain types of commercial and charitable relationships that are immaterial and, therefore, do not affect a director’s independence. As such, these categorical relationships are not considered by the Board when determining independence, though they are reported to the NGS Committee annually. The Board may determine that a director is independent even if that director has a relationship that does not fit within these categorical standards, provided that the relationship does not violate our independence standards or NYSE independence standards. If such a decision is made, the basis for the Board’s determination will be explained in the proxy statement for our next annual meeting of shareholders. Our independence standards are included in the appendix to our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The corporate governance documents referred to in this Proxy Statement can be found on our website. See Corporate Governance Materials Available on Our Website on page 90 .
Based on the NYSE’s and Dominion Energy’s independence standards, and considering all relevant facts and circumstances, the Board affirmatively determined that the following director nominees are independent: Messrs. Bennett, Dabbar, Hagood, Kington, Rigby and Spilman, Dr. Royal and Mses. Lovejoy, Story and Sutherland. Although they retired from the Board at last year’s Annual Meeting, the Board also affirmatively determined that Messrs. Ronald W. Jibson and Michael E. Szymanczyk were independent during their service as directors from January to May 2024.
In determining the independence of Mr. Jibson, the NGS Committee considered the employment of Mr. Jibson’s adult, financially independent son by Dominion Energy. During part of 2024, Mr. Jibson’s son was employed by Dominion Energy Wexpro Services Company, a former subsidiary of Dominion Energy that was sold to Enbridge in June 2024, as a manager of joint operations and regulatory affairs. Mr. Jibson’s son was not an executive officer of Dominion Energy or any of its subsidiaries and received compensation in accordance with the company’s compensation practices applicable to employees of equivalent qualifications, experiences and responsibilities. The NGS Committee recommended to the Board and the Board determined that the employment of Mr. Jibson’s son did not affect Mr. Jibson’s independence.
Additional Independence Requirements for the Audit Committee and Compensation and Talent Development (CTD) Committee Members . Our Audit Committee charter also contains additional independence requirements, including prohibiting its members from receiving any compensation from Dominion Energy, except in their capacity as a director or committee member, or as permitted by SEC rules with respect to fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan for prior services. Our CTD Committee charter also requires directors who serve on the CTD Committee to satisfy the independence requirements under Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act).
24 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
B oard Leadership Structure
Our Board regularly evaluates its leadership structure and considers alternative approaches as appropriate. The Board believes the company and its shareholders are best served by the Board retaining the flexibility to determine the appropriate leadership structure based on its assessment of company needs and circumstances, including whether the same individual should be Chair and CEO. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board will determine whether to combine or separate these roles, taking into consideration the needs of the company, succession planning, the skills and experience of the individual or individuals filling these positions and other relevant factors.
The Board believes there is no single best leadership structure that is the most effective in all circumstances and that a rigid leadership structure could impede the Board’s effectiveness and ability to act in the best interests of the company, its shareholders and the customers and communities we serve. The backgrounds and experiences of our directors provide the Board with broad perspectives from which to determine the leadership structure best suited for the company and the long-term interests of its shareholders.
2024 Governance Review
As part of its ongoing review of governance during 2024, the Board considered a variety of matters, including the Board’s leadership structure, the election of the Chair and independent Lead Director, the committee structure updates discussed herein, peer practices, governance trends, investor feedback, the results of Board evaluations and the voting results of the 2024 Annual Meeting at which a shareholder proposal to adopt a policy requiring the Board to have an independent chair at the next CEO transition received lower levels of support as compared to prior years.
During the review, the Board determined that the company and its shareholders continue to be best served by having Mr. Blue serve as Chair and CEO. The Board believes that a combined Chair and CEO role allows the company to effectively convey its business strategy and core values to shareholders, employees, customers and other stakeholders in a single, consistent voice. Since Mr. Blue’s election as CEO in 2020, the company has faced challenges and opportunities that required quick and nimble decision-making and steady leadership. During his tenure, the company began addressing unprecedented load growth in our service area, conducted a transparent business review, advanced the CVOW commercial project, grew our clean energy portfolio and had one of its safest years for our employees in the company’s history. His actions during this period have reaffirmed the Board’s trust in his leadership and their confidence in the combined Chair and CEO role at this time.
The Board believes that a primarily independent Board (with Mr. Blue as the only non-independent board member) and a robust independent Lead Director role ensures engaged, independent oversight from the Board. Their leadership is supplemented by engaged and experienced committee chairs along with independent-minded, skilled and committed directors. As part of the ongoing governance review and board refreshment, the Board elected Ms. Story as its new independent Lead Director effective May 2024. The Board selected Ms. Story due in part to her successful tenure as the former CEO of American Water, the largest publicly-traded water and wastewater utility company in the United States, and her time with Southern, where she served as Executive Vice President among other roles after originally joining Southern as a nuclear power plant engineer. With her experience in overseeing other public companies as a director, including as lead director of Raymond James and roles on a variety of board committees, the Board believes Ms. Story provides strong independent Board leadership. The Board has determined that the combined roles of Chair and CEO under Mr. Blue is appropriate at this time. However, as part of its ongoing governance review, the Board will continue to evaluate its leadership structure, taking into account the company’s specific needs and strategic objectives, as well as considering evolving industry norms and best practices. |
|
Susan N. Story Independent Lead Director since May 2024
Retired President and CEO, American Water Works Company, Inc.
Former Lead Director,
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 25
Independent Lead Director
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board annually elects a Chair of the Board, and if the Chair is not independent, the independent directors of the Board will elect one of their own to serve as the Lead Director.
Our Board believes that an active, empowered independent Lead Director with well-defined duties is key to providing strong, independent leadership for the Board. The independent Lead Director’s responsibilities include:
Board Leadership |
•
Presiding over the non-management executive session held at each Board meeting
•
Calling meetings of the independent directors, as needed
•
Conferring with the committee chairs and the Chair on agenda planning to ensure coverage of key strategic issues
•
Ensuring the Board’s ability to periodically review and provide input on and monitor management’s execution of the company’s long-term strategy
•
Serving as the independent directors’ representative in crisis situations
•
Acting as a key advisor to the CEO
•
Being authorized, in consultation with the Board, to retain independent advisors
•
Engaging directly with key members of the leadership team
|
Board Culture |
•
Serving as liaison between the Chair and the independent directors
•
Facilitating discussion among the independent directors on key issues and concerns
•
Ensuring Board discussions demonstrate constructive questioning of management
•
Promoting teamwork and communication among the independent directors
•
Fostering an environment that allows for engagement and commitment of Board members
|
Board Meetings |
•
Approving meeting agendas and information sent to the Board
•
Approving meeting schedules and working with the Chair and committee chairs to ensure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items
•
Presiding at all meetings or executive sessions of the Board at which the Chair is not present
|
Performance and Development |
•
Leading, in conjunction with the CTD Committee, the annual performance assessment of the CEO
•
Facilitating the Board’s engagement with the CEO and CEO succession planning
•
Leading the Board’s annual self-assessment and recommendations for improvement, if any
|
Shareholder Engagement |
•
Being available for direct engagement on matters related to Board governance and oversight, if requested by major shareholders
•
Providing appropriate Board oversight of key stakeholder and investor engagement and disclosures
|
Ms. Story currently serves as the independent Lead Director and does not chair any Board committees, which allows her to focus on her Lead Director responsibilities.
2024 Meetings and Attendance The Board met nine times in 2024. Each director serving in 2024 attended at least 75% of all Board meetings and the respective meetings of the committees on which he or she was a member held during the period for which he or she served as a director. As outlined in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend all Board and committee meetings. In addition, directors are expected to attend all annual meetings of shareholders. All of our directors standing for re-election at the 2025 Annual Meeting attended the 2024 Annual Meeting. Meetings of Independent Directors Executive sessions of our independent directors are held at each regularly scheduled Board meeting and are presided over by our independent Lead Director. |
2024 OVERALL AVERAGE
BOARD
|
26 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
The Com mittees of the Board
The Board established five standing committees (Audit, CTD, Finance, NGS and Safety, Technology, Nuclear and Operations (Operations)) to assist it with the performance of its responsibilities. Our NGS Committee reviews the chairs and membership of each committee on an annual basis, including with respect to succession planning, and makes recommendations to the full Board. Our Board committees are composed of independent directors and are governed by charters adopted by the Board. See Corporate Governance Materials Available on Our Website on page 90 . The Board elects the members of these committees and the committee chairs annually at its organizational meeting following our annual meeting of shareholders, taking into consideration the input of the NGS Committee. The chair of each committee develops the meeting agendas for that committee with management. After each meeting, each committee provides a full report to our Board.
Refreshed Committee Structure
Effective July 2024, the Board refreshed its committee structure following a holistic review of its committees’ responsibilities considering current governance trends, best practices and evolving regulatory requirements. As a result, the updated NGS Committee now oversees our performance as a sustainable company and responsible corporate citizen, including the company’s sustainability goals and reporting. The newly formed Operations Committee oversees the company’s significant operating segments and nuclear operations, which enables the Board to obtain further insight into the company’s operational performance, including our generation facilities and transmission and distribution program, environmental and safety matters and our cybersecurity program. The Audit Committee now oversees the implementation of policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management in addition to its responsibilities associated with compliance. The restructured Finance Committee continues to oversee the company’s financing activities and financial-related risks, including the company’s liquidity, capital structure, stock repurchase programs, energy trading activities, credit and market exposure, insurance coverage and investor relations program. The responsibility to oversee director compensation was transferred to the CTD Committee along with its existing responsibilities for the company’s human-capital management and executive compensation programs.
As part of the committee refreshment, several members of our Board were rotated to different committees to provide fresh perspectives, align their expertise with the adjusted committee responsibilities and balance time commitments among the directors.
Details about the primary role, responsibilities and number of meetings held during 2024 of each committee are provided below.
Audit Committee |
|
MEETINGS HELD IN 2024: NINE |
Joseph M. Rigby
(Chair)
|
|
ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES The Audit Committee’s primary responsibilities include:
•
Overseeing the integrity of the company’s financial statements and financial reporting practices;
•
Overseeing the company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and our systems of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting;
•
Appointing and retaining the independent auditor and evaluating its qualification, independence, performance and fees;
•
Overseeing the performance of the company’s internal audit function;
•
Overseeing the company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management; and
•
Overseeing the company’s Ethics & Compliance program.
The Audit Committee periodically meets with both the independent auditor and internal auditor in separate sessions without management present and consults with the independent and internal auditors regarding audits of the company’s consolidated financial statements and adequacy of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s report is on page 80 . Each member meets the financial literacy requirements for Audit Committee membership under the NYSE’s rules and the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has determined that Dr. Royal, Ms. Sutherland and Mr. Rigby are “audit committee financial experts,” as defined under SEC rules. |
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 27
Compensation and Talent Development Committee |
MEETINGS HELD IN 2024: FIVE |
||
Robert H. Spilman, Jr.
|
|
ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES The CTD Committee’s primary responsibilities include:
•
Overseeing the company’s executive compensation plan, policies and programs;
•
Reviewing and evaluating the performance and compensation of the CEO;
•
Reviewing the management succession plans for the CEO and other senior executive positions with the CEO; and
•
Overseeing strategies and policies related to human capital management, including hiring, employee engagement and employee recruitment, retention and development.
The CTD Committee also annually reviews and assesses the compensation paid to Board members and recommends to the Board any changes to compensation and benefit plans it believes are appropriate. The CTD Committee consults directly with its independent compensation consultant, as needed, in reviewing and approving the company’s executive compensation program and the compensation paid to Board members. This includes the executive compensation program’s philosophy and strategy and ensuring that the program is based on sound compensation practices. For more information on the responsibilities and activities of the CTD Committee, see CD&A beginning on page 40 . The CTD Committee’s report to shareholders is on page 63 . Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation No member of the CTD Committee has served as an officer or employee of Dominion Energy at any time. No Dominion Energy executive officer serves as a member of the compensation committee or on the board of directors of any company at which a member of Dominion Energy’s CTD Committee or the Board serves as an executive officer. |
Finance Committee |
MEETINGS HELD IN 2024: FOUR |
||
Mark J. Kington (Chair)
|
|
ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES The Finance Committee’s primary responsibilities include:
•
Overseeing the company’s short-term and long-term financial policies, objectives and performance;
•
Reviewing the company’s capital structure and financing flexibility as well as the company’s historical and proposed financing activities;
•
Reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding the company’s dividend policy;
•
Reviewing, approving and recommending to the Board the amounts, timing, types and terms of public and private stock issuances and plans, as well as recommending to the Board any stock repurchase programs and periodically reviewing such programs and activities; and
•
Reviewing the company’s insurance coverage, investor relations program and, in a non-fiduciary capacity, the performance of the company’s pension, nuclear decommissioning trust and other investment funds.
|
28 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee |
MEETINGS HELD IN 2024: FOUR |
||
Pamela J. Royal, M.D.
|
|
ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES The NGS Committee’s primary responsibilities include:
•
Directing the search for, evaluating the qualifications of and recommending candidates for nomination to the Board;
•
Reviewing and making recommendations to the Board concerning the appointment and composition of each Board committee and its chair;
•
Overseeing the annual self-evaluation of the Board’s effectiveness and the overall evaluation process;
•
Assisting the Board in its oversight of the company’s performance as a sustainable organization and responsible corporate citizen;
•
Reviewing the company’s policies, programs and activities related to sustainability and governance, including the sustainability and corporate responsibility report;
•
Receiving reports on the state of Dominion Energy’s relationships with key stakeholders, such as the matters raised by shareholders through the company’s shareholder engagement program;
•
Reviewing sustainability goals established by Dominion Energy and reports from management on the company’s progress in achieving those goals; and
•
Reviewing and overseeing compliance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The NGS Committee is also briefed on any relevant regulatory or administrative requirements or developments (NYSE, SEC, etc.) and provides updates to the full Board on potential impacts and next steps. |
Safety, Technology, Nuclear and Operations Committee |
MEETINGS HELD IN 2024: TWO |
||
James A. Bennett (Chair)
|
|
ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES The Operations Committee’s primary responsibilities include:
•
Reviewing the company’s overall safety performance and results and any significant changes to policies or practices with respect to health and safety;
•
Reviewing key performance indicators for the company’s operations and significant events related to operations, facilities and assets as well as customer service;
•
Reviewing any changes to the long-term strategies and major plans relating to the company’s generation facilities and transmission and distribution programs;
•
Reviewing reports on the status of the company’s major capital projects and programs related to generation facilities and transmission and distribution systems;
•
Reviewing and discussing reports with management pertaining to oversight of the company’s nuclear operations;
•
Overseeing the company’s programs, policies, initiatives and strategies relating to cybersecurity;
•
Reviewing the company’s overall environmental performance and results and any significant changes to policies, practices or programs with respect to climate change (including climate reports) and the protection and improvement of the quality of the environment; and
•
Overseeing the company’s initiatives to support technology.
|
In connection with the updated committee structure, the Board disbanded the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility (SCR) Committee effective July 2024 after reallocating its responsibilities among the other committees. At the time of its only meeting during 2024, it was chaired by Ms. Story and included Messrs. Bennett, Hagood, Jibson and Szymanczyk as the other members.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 29
O ur Board’s Oversight Role
Shareholders elect the Board to oversee management and the long-term health and overall success of the company. In fulfilling this role, each director must exercise their good faith business judgment of the best interests of the company and its shareholders. The Board and its committees work closely with management to balance and align strategy, risk, sustainability and other areas while considering feedback from shareholders. A transparent and active dialogue between the Board and its committees and management is essential to the Board’s oversight role.
Oversight of Strategy
Oversight of the company’s business strategy and strategic planning is a key responsibility of the Board. The Board believes that overseeing and monitoring strategy is a continuous process and involves a multilayered approach. While the Board oversees strategic planning, management is charged with developing and executing the company’s business strategy. The Board’s oversight and management’s execution of our business strategy are viewed with a long-term mindset and a focus on assessing opportunities and potential risks to the company.
The Board monitors strategy through ongoing robust and constructive engagement with management, taking into consideration the company’s key priorities, trends impacting our business and industry and regulatory developments, among other things. The Board recognizes that the true measure of its stewardship is an effective long-term growth strategy that addresses the interests of shareholders and other constituencies, including customers, employees, suppliers, neighbors in the communities we serve and the environment.
Given the iterative nature of strategy development, the Board’s oversight of strategy is ongoing and embedded in its governance activities throughout the year, including review of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and long-term financial plans and investor expectations |
|
The company’s operations, safety, sustainability, customer experience, workforce development and innovation efforts |
|
Major construction and infrastructure initiatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public policy updates covering new regulations
|
|
The company’s
|
|
The company’s Ethics & Compliance program and compliance activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outside regularly scheduled meetings, management provides the Board with monthly updates on key metrics and the Chair communicates with Board members regarding important opportunities and developments that could affect the company’s strategy and any other matters regarding the company’s operations that deserve the Board’s prompt attention. The Chair and the independent Lead Director also encourage informal discussion among the directors.
As part of its ongoing oversight of strategy, including meetings focused on strategy and long-term planning, the Board discusses with management the development and execution of our strategic and financial plans as well as events that may impact those plans. To enhance the Board’s understanding of the company’s future, the Board meets periodically with outside consultants and industry leaders. In 2024, the Board met with a panel of energy industry experts to discuss their perspectives on data center growth.
The Board also conducts visits to operational sites to learn more about the company’s operations, technologies and workforce. In 2024, the Board visited:
30 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Oversight of Risk
Responsible stewardship of our business strategy necessarily involves its oversight of potential risks to the company. The Board oversees the company’s risk profile and management’s processes for assessing and managing risk, through both the whole Board and its committees. Dominion Energy has implemented comprehensive enterprise risk management processes across the organization to identify, assess and manage risks. Management reports and mitigates these risks in accordance with our risk management policies. The Board oversees the company’s risk profile and management’s risk assessment and mitigation processes, both as a whole and through its committees. In performing its oversight responsibilities, the Board has implemented a risk governance framework designed to help the directors:
|
|
|
|
|
Understand critical risks to the company’s business and its strategic plan |
Allocate responsibilities for risk oversight among the full Board and its committees |
Evaluate the company’s risk management processes and whether they are functioning adequately
|
Facilitate regular and open dialogue between management and directors |
Foster a culture of risk awareness throughout the company |
The Board and its committees regularly receive and discuss reports from members of management, including the most senior risk officer and others involved in risk assessment and risk management. At least annually, management identifies and assesses and reports to the Board about the major risks associated with each of our key business segments and our nuclear operations. Risk assessments and reports are also conducted at a corporate level for Dominion Energy. These assessments include a wide range of educated assumptions about what the future will look like, especially regarding external factors outside our control. The Board is also offered educational opportunities to learn more about the risks that may affect the company and our industry in meetings and at external educational offerings.
The Board
The full Board has primary responsibility for risk oversight. Each of the Board’s committees assist the Board in fulfilling this important role by overseeing the risks in areas over which it is responsible. The entire Board regularly receives reports from the committees on their oversight activities and is given the opportunity to review the relevant risk oversight materials.
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
Audit Committee
Oversees the integrity of the company’s financial statements and other disclosures, internal control over financial reporting, the internal audit function, the independent auditor and the implementation of risk assessment and risk management policies and objectives.
|
Compensation and Talent Development Committee
Oversees risks associated with the company’s compensation program and policies, including workforce-related risks, to align with the company’s risk management objectives.
|
Finance Committee
Oversees financial-related risks, including liquidity, capital structure, insurance coverages and financing activities, such as stock issuances and repurchases, policies and limits for energy trading activities, credit and market exposure, and credit and risk measurements. |
|||
Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee
Oversees risks related to our overall corporate governance, including board effectiveness, composition and succession planning, as well as sustainability and corporate responsibility matters, including sustainability disclosures, philanthropy, and political participation and contributions.
|
Safety, Technology, Nuclear
Oversees risks related to operational matters, including the company’s transmission, distribution and generation operations, nuclear, physical security/cybersecurity and environmental performance, including climate reports. |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
Management
Management has day-to-day responsibility for identifying, assessing, managing and monitoring risks by utilizing enterprise risk management processes and controls. |
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 31
To learn more about risks facing the company, you can review the risks described in Item 1A. Risk Factors in the 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks described in the 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the company. Additional risks and uncertainties also may materially adversely affect the company’s business, financial condition or results of operations in future periods.
Oversight of Information Technology and Cybersecurity Risk
Recognizing information technology as a key risk for the company, the Board devotes significant time and attention to data and systems protection, including cybersecurity and information security risk. The company uses a converged security model that brings together cybersecurity, physical security and threat intelligence within one department led by the Chief Security Officer, who joined the company from the Federal Bureau of Investigation after a more than 20-year career focused on criminal, counter-terrorism, counter-intelligence and cyber investigations.
The Board, the Operations Committee, and when appropriate, the Audit Committee receive presentations and reports throughout the year on information technology, cybersecurity and information security risk from management, including the company’s Chief Security Officer, Director of Cybersecurity and Chief Information Officer. These presentations and reports address a broad range of topics, including updates on the company’s cyber risk management program, recent cybersecurity threats and incidents across the industry, policies and practices, industry trends, threat environment and vulnerability assessments, specific and ongoing efforts to prevent, detect and respond to internal and external critical threats and the company’s practical exercises with external federal, state and local incident response partners. In addition, the Board receives briefings from time to time from outside experts for an independent view on cybersecurity risks, including assessments by independent consulting firms and legal counsel of our readiness and resilience.
Presentations to the Board and the appropriate Committees include updates on emerging technologies, like advanced forms of automation and artificial intelligence. As part of our information technology program, the company has also instituted a Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy that is designed to mitigate risks arising from employee use of generative artificial intelligence and protect the company, its employees and its customers from such risks, without restricting employees’ ability to use approved efficiency-enhancing generative artificial intelligence tools in an appropriate manner.
With cyber tactics and strategies constantly evolving, our educational and refreshment processes are structured so that the Board can evaluate management’s and the company’s efforts to protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data and systems.
Management also has an executive Cyber Risk Council, which includes executive officers responsible for administrative services, corporate affairs, supply chain and corporate risk along with legal counsel and the corporate secretary. The company maintains a robust, tested and regularly revised Cyber Security Incident Response Plan and a Vendor Compromise Response Plan that provide clear direction for escalation of information to leadership, including to the Board as appropriate. To learn more about the company’s risk management, strategy and governance matters related to cybersecurity, review the information described in Item 1C. Cybersecurity in the 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Oversight of Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
Consistent with the prominent role of increasingly clean energy in our business strategy, sustainability and corporate responsibility are key areas of Board oversight. The Board receives and discusses regular reports on sustainability and corporate responsibility matters, including those related to safety, implementation of the company’s Net Zero emission plan, environmental compliance, innovation and technology and sustainability initiatives across the company. Our NGS Committee oversees the company’s approach to sustainability and reputational matters, including the company’s charitable contribution and community service program, political participation and contributions, updates on carbon and methane emission reduction goals and other sustainability-related matters.
Under the oversight of the NGS Committee, in September 2024, the company published its annual Sustainability & Corporate Responsibility Report, which provides updates on our material sustainability priorities and goals and our performance in these areas. For additional information, see Sustainability and Our Path to Net Zero beginning on page 36 .
In support of effective climate governance, our Operations Committee oversees the company’s overall environmental performance and results and policies, practices and programs with respect to climate change (including climate reports) and the protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. Dominion Energy also operates an executive-level Climate Council supported by working groups and strategy teams in developing and overseeing climate-related strategy and performance. To evaluate the alignment of our capital investments with our business strategy to provide
32 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy, we have a management-level Investment Review Committee that oversees the review of all significant proposed investments.
Oversight of Political Contributions and Lobbying
Ethics is one of our five core values and the driver of our commitment to transparency in what we do. Our transparency of political disclosure and spending accountability has been recognized as a “trendsetter” by the Center for Political Accountability – Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure since 2018. We have a lobbying and political contributions policy, which governs Dominion Energy’s lobbying activities, including direct, indirect and grassroots lobbying, our participation in trade associations and our political contributions. Our policy includes a prohibition on contributions to independent-only political expenditure committees in support of or in opposition to a campaign (also known as Super PACs). As a company whose operations are subject to extensive regulation throughout its multi-state service territory, Dominion Energy actively participates in political processes at local, state and national levels. Our goal is to contribute to legislative and rule-making activities affecting our business consistent with our corporate values and strategies, and to educate and inform public officials of the practical effects of public policy decisions and objectives they consider. Our efforts consistently balance several primary and related goals: to create and preserve long-term shareholder value; to provide reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy to our customers; and to preserve and improve the natural environment consistent with our corporate commitments.
We strive to conduct our business transparently, build public trust and form lasting and mutually beneficial relationships by engaging with public officials, regulators, our community, business leaders and environmental and safety agencies and advocates. In addition, we align our lobbying activities and trade association participation with our core business and our bedrock principles of environmental sustainability, energy reliability, customer affordability and shareholder value. On an annual basis, our Senior Vice President – Corporate Affairs & Communications reports to the NGS Committee on the company’s political and lobbying activities, expenditures and governing policies. This includes payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations that may be used for political purposes.
To promote transparency of our political activity, we also publish the following information on our website: (i) all contributions to 527 tax-exempt political organizations; (ii) contributions to certain 501(c)(4) tax-exempt organizations that appear to utilize some funds for political purposes; (iii) with respect to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations to which we contribute $50,000 or more, the portions of our payments attributable to lobbying; (iv) payments greater than $50,000 in the aggregate to national 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations whose predominant purpose is to provide venues for the exchange of ideas on matters of public policy; and (v) political contributions by our state and federal political action committee.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 33
Shareholder Engagement Highlights
We believe a robust shareholder engagement program is an essential component of effective corporate governance. Our approach to engaging openly with our shareholders provides increased accountability and transparency and ultimately drives long-term value.
|
|
A cross-functional team from management and subject matter employees engage on a regular basis with shareholders to gain their perspectives and to share our views on current issues and priorities. In addition, our directors also participate in select shareholder engagements to hear feedback directly from our top investors. This outreach includes:
•
Engagement with sponsors of shareholder proposals
•
Meetings with institutional investors to discuss company performance, corporate governance, executive compensation, environmental and other matters
•
Investor and industry conferences
•
Annual meeting of shareholders with Q&A session
•
Quarterly earnings calls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We assess and share the feedback we receive from shareholders with our management and the Board, while taking into consideration best practices and industry practices. The Board discusses and evaluates the voting results of each annual meeting of shareholders and uses such results to inform potential actions to be taken. Based on the feedback received, we evaluate potential enhancements to policies, practices and disclosures, as appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past enhancements informed by shareholder input include:
•
The ability for shareholders to call a special meeting
•
The ability for shareholders to nominate directors through proxy access
•
Adjustments to the long-term incentives for our executives
•
Adjustments to our sustainability priorities and goals for our performance in these areas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2024, we reached out to shareholders representing approximately 56% of our outstanding common stock. We held meetings with holders of approximately 44% of our outstanding common stock. |
|
Participants: A cross-functional team—including members of management from the corporate secretary, investor relations, sustainability, environmental, public policy and executive compensation teams—participate in shareholder engagement efforts. At times, some of our independent directors participate in some shareholder meetings. Topics Discussed:
•
The company’s strategic business review
•
Corporate governance, including Board leadership structure, composition, refreshment and oversight and amendments to the company’s Bylaws
•
Executive compensation, including short and long-term incentive plan metrics
•
Environmental matters, including climate-related disclosures, emissions reduction goals, the impact of data centers and load growth and clean energy investments, such as offshore wind and small modular reactors
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Ot her Governance Practices and Policies
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Dominion Energy’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are intended to support the Board in its oversight role and in fulfilling its obligation to shareholders.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines address, among other things:
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our website. See Corporate Governance Materials Available on Our Website on page 90 .
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
The Board adopted Related Party Transaction Guidelines for the purpose of identifying potential conflicts of interest arising out of financial transactions, arrangements and relationships between Dominion Energy and any related person. Under our guidelines, a related person is a director, executive officer, director nominee, beneficial owner of more than 5% of Dominion Energy’s common stock or any immediate family member of one of the foregoing persons. A related party transaction is any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in excess of $120,000 in which Dominion Energy (and/or any of its consolidated subsidiaries) is a participant and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. The full text of the guidelines can be found on our website. See Corporate Governance Materials Available on Our Website on page 90 .
The NGS Committee conducts a reasonable prior review of all related party transactions and considers the relevant facts and circumstances in determining whether to approve a related party transaction. The NGS Committee approves only those transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of Dominion Energy and its shareholders and that comply with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct.
Other than as described below, since January 1, 2024, there have been no related party transactions that were required to be approved under Dominion Energy’s Related Party Transaction Guidelines or reported under the SEC’s related party transaction rules.
During 2024, Mr. Paul Jibson, the son of Mr. Ronald W. Jibson, a director who retired from the Board at last year’s annual meeting, was employed by Dominion Energy Wexpro Services Company, a former subsidiary of Dominion Energy that was sold to Enbridge in June 2024, as a manager of joint operations and regulatory affairs. Mr. Paul Jibson received compensation in 2024 of approximately $129,000, consisting of salary, an annual incentive award payout, dividend payments on unvested restricted stock and other benefits. The compensation paid to Mr. Paul Jibson was in accordance with the company’s compensation practices applicable to employees of equivalent qualifications, experience and responsibilities. Furthermore, Mr. Paul Jibson’s compensation was approved by the NGS Committee in accordance with Dominion Energy’s Related Party Transaction Guidelines.
During 2024, two providers of asset management services to Dominion Energy were also beneficial owners of at least 5% of Dominion Energy common stock: The Vanguard Group (Vanguard) and BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock). The nature and value of services provided by these 5% shareholders and their affiliates are described below.
In each of these cases, the investment management agreements were entered into on an arm’s-length basis in the ordinary course of business. These transactions were reviewed and approved in accordance with Dominion Energy’s Related Party Transaction Guidelines.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 35
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
At Dominion Energy, our core value of ethics reminds us that doing the right thing is imperative to maintaining the trust of investors, customers, regulators, co-workers and others. To that end, the company has a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to our Board, our principal executive, financial and accounting officers and all other employees. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is intended to promote lawful and ethical behavior by all Dominion Energy employees and Board members. It covers a wide range of professional conduct, including conflicts of interest, unfair or unethical use of corporate opportunities, protection of confidential information, compliance with applicable laws and regulations and oversight of ethics and compliance by employees of the company. Additionally, it details each individual’s duty to report any unethical behavior or other violation of company policy or law and how to make such reports, including anonymously through the Dominion Energy Compliance Line or electronically through the Dominion Energy Compliance Line Online.
The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which was most recently reviewed and updated in 2023, can be found on our website. See Corporate Governance Materials Available on Our Website on page 90 .
Any waivers or changes to our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct relating to our executive officers will be posted to our website.
Securities Trading Policy
We have
Sustainability and Our Path to Net Zero
Our commitment to achieving Net Zero carbon and methane emissions by 2050 includes Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and material categories of Scope 3 emissions. 1 This commitment works in concert with many of our other goals enabling us to execute our mission to deliver the reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy that powers our customers every day. Reliability and affordability are fundamental to our clean-energy strategy, because the energy transition can only succeed if customers can count on reliable, affordable service. In addition, we are focused on limiting our impact on our communities. We expanded our industry-leading environmental justice program and remain committed to a just transition for our employees, communities and other stakeholders.
We continue to make significant progress toward our decarbonization goals. From 2005 through 2023, we reduced Scope 1 carbon emissions from electric generation by 53%. 2 Likewise, we reduced methane emissions from our natural gas business by 50% from 2010 through 2023. 2 These reductions position us well as we strive toward reaching Net Zero by 2050.
We take pride in our transparent reporting on sustainability matters. In 2024, we continued our efforts to provide relevant and actionable information to our investors by updating our Sustainability & Corporate Responsibility Report and provided an extended, digital version of the report containing additional content, including sustainability-related metrics and extended employee highlights.
Find links to our sustainability disclosures at sustainability.dominionenergy.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.
|
1 Scope 1 emissions refer to direct carbon and methane emissions from our operations and includes emissions on an equity share basis for Cove Point LNG, LP for period of ownership and from Dominion Energy’s renewable natural gas facilities, as well as direct emissions from building heat, corporate aviation, military privatization assets and the company’s on-road and off-road vehicle fleet. Scope 2 emissions refer to emissions from transmission and distribution line losses associated with wholesale purchased power, in addition to electricity consumed by company facilities located outside of Dominion Energy’s electric service territories. Scope 3 emissions include emissions from three material categories: electricity purchased to power the grid, fossil fuel purchased for our power stations and gas distribution systems and consumption of sales gas by our natural gas customers.
2 As of December 31, 2023. Electric baseline year 2005. Gas baseline year 2010. All environmental and other related metrics are inclusive of assets owned in 2023, specifically, 2023 metrics include assets divested in 2024, including in connection with our strategic business review completed in March 2024. The company expects future reporting will be adjusted to reflect the outcome of the companywide business review.
36 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
C ompensation of Non-Employee Directors
Our non-employee director compensation program is designed to attract and retain highly qualified directors and align their interests with those of our shareholders. We compensate our non-employee directors with a combination of cash and equity awards, along with certain other benefits as described below.
During its annual review of the non-employee director compensation program for 2024, the NGS Committee, which oversaw director compensation prior to the committee changes, considered an analysis prepared by its independent consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (FW Cook). The analysis summarized director compensation trends for non-employee directors and pay levels at the same peer companies used to evaluate the compensation of our NEOs at that time. Following this review, and after considering the analysis of FW Cook, the NGS Committee recommended no changes to the non-employee director compensation program.
Subsequent to its annual review and in connection with the revised committee responsibilities and the formation of the Operations Committee, the NGS Committee considered an updated analysis prepared by its independent consultant, FW Cook, with respect to committee chair retainer pay levels. Following this review, and after considering the analysis of FW Cook, the NGS Committee recommended no changes to the committee chair retainers for the restructured Audit, CTD, Finance and NGS Committees and recommended an annual $25,000 committee chair retainer for the Operations Committee.
For 2024, our non-employee director compensation program consisted of the following:
Annual Retainer |
|
Additional Annual Cash Retainers and Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$50,000 |
Lead Director |
|
|
|
|
|
$25,000 |
Audit Committee, CTD Committee and Operations Committee chairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$20,000 |
Finance Committee and NGS Committee chairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,000 |
Excess meeting fee to each director who attends more than 25 meetings per calendar year, including Board and committee meetings, but not special education sessions |
|
|
|
|
The following table and footnotes reflect the compensation and fees received in 2024 by our non-employee directors for their services. Mr. Blue does not receive any separate compensation for service as a director.
Name |
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
Stock
|
|
All Other
|
|
Total |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Bennett |
|
$ |
142,500 |
|
|
$ |
167,494 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
314,994 |
|
Paul M. Dabbar |
|
|
117,500 |
|
|
|
167,494 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
284,994 |
|
D. Maybank Hagood |
|
|
117,500 |
|
|
|
167,494 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
284,994 |
|
Ronald W. Jibson (4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
51,410 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
51,410 |
|
Mark J. Kington |
|
|
137,500 |
|
|
|
167,494 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
309,994 |
|
Kristin G. Lovejoy |
|
|
117,500 |
|
|
|
167,494 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
284,994 |
|
Joseph M. Rigby |
|
|
142,500 |
|
|
|
167,494 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
309,994 |
|
Pamela J. Royal, M.D. |
|
|
137,500 |
|
|
|
167,494 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
304,994 |
|
Robert H. Spilman, Jr. |
|
|
142,500 |
|
|
|
167,494 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
309,994 |
|
Susan N. Story |
|
|
187,500 |
|
|
|
167,494 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
354,994 |
|
Vanessa Allen Sutherland |
|
|
117,500 |
|
|
|
167,494 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
289,994 |
|
Michael E. Szymanczyk (4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
102,820 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
102,820 |
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 37
D irector Compensation Plan and Benefits
Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan
Our non-employee directors are paid their annual retainers and meeting fees under the Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan. A director may elect to receive all or a portion of his or her meeting fees in the form of cash or stock. If a director does not make an election, meeting fees are paid in cash. This plan also allows directors to defer all or a portion of their annual cash retainer and meeting fees into stock unit or cash accounts and all or a portion of their annual stock retainer into stock unit accounts. Stock unit accounts are credited quarterly with additional stock units equal in value to dividends paid on Dominion Energy common stock, and cash accounts are credited monthly with interest (none of the directors currently have any deferred cash account balances). Shares of Dominion Energy common stock equal in value to stock units held for directors under this plan are issued into a trust and directors retain all voting and other rights as shareholders. Distributions under this plan are made when a director ceases to serve on the Board. Additionally, if a director has served at least five years, he or she will receive a departure stock grant of 1,000 shares of Dominion Energy common stock upon departure from the Board. If that director also served as a committee chair or Lead Director in the year preceding the year of departure, he or she will be granted an additional 1,000 shares of Dominion Energy common stock for each such position held upon departure from the Board. In addition, this plan allows for grants of restricted stock awards and stock options to Board members. However, no stock options or restricted stock awards were granted under this plan in 2024 and no such awards are outstanding.
Matching Gifts Program
Dominion Energy’s philanthropic arm, the Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation, will match a director’s donations, on a one-to-one basis, to one or more 501(c)(3) organizations up to a maximum of $5,000 per year. This benefit is also available to all Dominion Energy employees.
Expense Reimbursements
We pay and/or reimburse directors for travel, lodging and related expenses they incur in attending Board and committee meetings and for other business-related travel. In addition, directors and their spouses may accompany the CEO or other senior executives on the corporate aircraft for both business and personal travel. We do not provide tax gross-ups on any imputed income for the directors.
N on-Employee Director Stock Ownership
Within four years of their election to the Board, each non-employee director is expected to acquire and hold the lesser of 12,000 shares of Dominion Energy common stock or an amount of shares equal in value to five times the annual cash and stock retainers combined. Each of our non-employee directors who have been members of the Board for at least four years have met their share ownership requirements.
We prohibit our directors and their designees from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) or otherwise engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or that are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of shares of our common stock or other equity securities, granted to them as compensation or otherwise held, directly or indirectly, by them. Our directors are also prohibited from using margin accounts and pledging shares of our common stock or other equity securities as collateral.
38 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
IT EM 2 |
Advisory Vote on Approval of Executive Compensation (Say on Pay)
You are being asked to vote on an advisory basis on the compensation paid to the company’s NEOs as described in this Proxy Statement, including the CD&A, compensation tables and narrative discussion on the following pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this item. |
We provide shareholders with a Say on Pay vote every year at the annual meeting of shareholders. While the vote is non-binding, the Board and the CTD Committee take the results of the vote into consideration when evaluating the executive compensation program. In connection with this proposal, the Board encourages shareholders to review, in detail, the description of the executive compensation program for our NEOs that is set forth in the CD&A section, as well as the information contained in the compensation tables and narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement.
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, develop and retain an experienced and highly qualified executive team; motivate and reward superior performance that supports our business and strategic plans and contributes to Dominion Energy’s long-term success; and reinforce our five core values of safety, ethics, excellence, embrace change and One Dominion Energy, our term for teamwork. The guiding principle of our compensation philosophy is to link executive pay to company performance. We align the interests of our executive officers, including our NEOs, with those of our shareholders, customers, communities and other stakeholders by making a substantial portion of pay subject to performance goals that, if achieved, are expected to increase total shareholder return (TSR), enhance customer service and foster community well-being.
For 2024, we demonstrated our commitment to our pay for performance philosophy:
As reflected in the Pay versus Performance section of this Proxy Statement, we believe our executive compensation program is aligned with our performance.
We are asking shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the 2025 Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the company’s named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis , compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED on an advisory basis.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 39
E xecutive Compensation
C ompensation Discussion and Analysis
E xecutive Summary
Our executive compensation program supports our business goals by rewarding performance that creates shareholder value and serves our customers and communities. This CD&A focuses on the 2024 compensation of our CEO, our CFO and our three other most highly compensated officers who were deemed to be executive officers by our Board pursuant to SEC rules. Collectively, these named executive officers are referred to as the NEOs.
Dominion Energy’s NEOs for 2024 were:
|
|
|
|
||
|
Robert M. Blue
Chair, President and Chief
|
Steven D. Ridge
Executive Vice President and Chief
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diane Leopold
Executive Vice President, Chief
|
Carlos M. Brown
President - Dominion Energy Services and Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary |
Edward H. Baine
President – Dominion Energy Virginia |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 Leadership Announcements
In December 2024, we announced Ms. Leopold’s upcoming retirement on June 1, 2025. In addition, we announced that effective January 1, 2025, Mr. Baine assumed responsibility for utility operations as President – Utility Operations and Dominion Energy Virginia.
Compensation Philosophy
|
|
|
|
Pay for performance, making a substantial portion of NEO compensation equity-based or subject to performance goals |
Attract, develop and retain an experienced and highly qualified executive officer team |
Motivate and reward superior performance that supports our business and strategic plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Align executive management’s interests with those of our shareholders, customers, communities and other stakeholders |
Drive short-term and long-term goal achievement while reinforcing our five core values of safety, ethics, excellence, embrace change and One Dominion Energy, our term for teamwork |
||
|
|
To determine if we are meeting these objectives, the CTD Committee compares the company’s actual performance to our short-term and long-term goals and to our peer companies’ performance.
2024 Compensation Program: Paying for Performance
Consistent with our objective to reward strong company performance—based on achievement of short-term and long-term goals—a significant portion of total cash and total direct compensation is variable. Approximately 89% of Mr. Blue’s targeted 2024 total direct compensation was performance-based (tied to pre-approved performance metrics, including operating EPS and relative TSR) or equity-based compensation. For the other NEOs, approximately 74% of their targeted 2024 total direct compensation was performance-based or equity-based compensation.
40 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
The charts below illustrate the components of the annualized target total direct compensation opportunities provided to Mr. Blue and target direct compensation opportunities of the other NEOs.
2024 CEO Target Compensation Mix |
2024 Other NEOs Target Compensation Mix |
|
|
|
|
New Performance Share Unit Awards
In 2024, we further aligned pay with performance and industry practice by transitioning the performance-based portion of our Long-Term Incentive Program (LTIP) from a cash-denominated performance grant to performance share units (PSUs).
Performance Share Units |
Each PSU represents the right to receive, at settlement, an amount in cash equal to the fair market value of one share of our common stock following satisfaction of the applicable vesting requirements. Accordingly, replacing cash performance grants with PSUs further aligned compensation with shareholder outcomes.
Under SEC rules, our Summary Compensation Table on page 65 is required to include the value of any cash-denominated performance grants in the year of payment (under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column), whereas the value of PSU grants, even if settled in cash, must be included in the year of grant (under the Stock Awards column).
• This means that the SEC Total column in our Summary Compensation Table for 2024 includes the value of both the (i) 2022 cash-denominated performance grants that were paid in 2024 and (ii) PSUs granted in 2024 (even though the actual performance underlying such grant is not yet known and no payout will occur until 2027, if any).
• For clarity, no NEO was granted both a cash-denominated performance grant and PSU award in 2024, nor did any NEO receive a payment from both a cash-denominated performance grant and PSU award in 2024.
To facilitate a better understanding of our compensation practices in 2024, we added a new supplemental Realized Pay column to our Summary Compensation Table , which we believe will allow a more meaningful year-over-year comparison of total compensation under these circumstances where we have ceased offering cash-denominated performance grants in favor of PSUs.
|
Shareholder Outreach and Say on Pay
We have a long tradition of engaging with our shareholders to understand and consider their perspectives. Our management engages with shareholders on a variety of topics throughout the year to solicit input and discuss and answer questions on the company’s policies and practices, including executive compensation. Shareholder feedback is considered by management, shared with the Board and reflected in enhancements to our policies and practices, as appropriate.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 41
During 2024, we engaged with shareholders who, in the aggregate, represented approximately 44% of our outstanding shares. We discussed a wide variety of issues, including our executive compensation program. Shareholders were generally supportive of our executive compensation program and appreciated our Proxy Statement’s clear disclosure.
We received 95.1% support from our shareholders for our executive compensation program pursuant to the Say on Pay vote at our 2024 Annual Meeting, up from 91.7% at our 2023 Annual Meeting. Shareholders currently have an opportunity annually to cast an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation program.
Below is an overview of the executive compensation topics that we discussed with our shareholders and our responses.
|
|
|
|
What We Heard |
How We Responded |
|
|
|
|
|
For 2024, our CEO again received long-term incentive awards that were 100% performance-based, with 93% of the payout based on relative TSR or cumulative operating EPS and requiring 65th percentile performance for an at-target payout of the relative TSR metric. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What We Heard |
How We Responded |
|
|
|
|
|
For 2024, we revamped our LTIP for all officers. Under the 2024 program, the cash performance grant was replaced with PSUs, to further align compensation with shareholder outcomes. In addition, the portion of the total LTIP grant attributable to restricted stock was reduced from 40% to 30%, with 70% attributable to the new PSU grant. Our CEO received a performance share award in lieu of the restricted stock portion of his 2024 LTIP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What We Heard |
How We Responded |
|
|
|
|
|
The ability to earn any payout based on our relative P/E ratio modifier was eliminated for all officers starting with the 2024 LTIP. |
|
|
|
More information on these changes may be found under Long-Term Incentive Program on page 49 . We strongly value input from our shareholders and will continue our outreach efforts on a variety of topics, including executive compensation, as our compensation program evolves in the future.
42 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Our Compensation Practices and Policies
Dominion Energy supports our culture of good governance with compensation practices that promote pay and performance alignment and strategic risk management.
What We Do |
|
What We Don’t Do |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make a substantial portion of NEO pay equity-based or subject to performance goals that tie to enhanced shareholder value |
|
|
Allow payout of AIP awards or LTIP performance grants greater than 200% of target |
|
|
Offer long-term or indefinite employment agreements to our executive officers |
||
|
Integrate key performance metrics in our Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) and LTIP relating to safety, reliability, compliance, environmental stewardship and sustainability and customer experience |
|
||
|
|
Include long-term incentive awards in retirement or severance calculations (other than prorated payout of outstanding awards) |
||
|
|
Permit officers to hedge or pledge shares of our common stock |
||
|
Balance short-term and long-term incentives |
|||
|
Require significant stock ownership, including 6x base salary for our CEO, 4x base salary for our Executive Vice Presidents and 3x base salary for our other NEOs |
|
|
Offer excessive executive perquisites or provide tax gross-ups on executive perquisites except for certain benefits provided through the company’s relocation program |
|
|
Dilute shareholder value by issuing excessive equity compensation |
||
|
Tie equity and cash-based incentive compensation to a clawback policy |
|||
|
Include a non-compete clause in our executive retirement plans |
|
|
Offer excessive change in control severance benefits |
|
Consider shareholder feedback, including results of prior years’ Say on Pay votes |
|
|
Provide excise tax gross-ups in change in control agreements for newer officers (first elected after February 1, 2013) |
|
Require two triggers for the payment of most change in control benefits |
|
|
|
Our Performance
Dominion Energy is committed to a simple but critical mission: to provide the reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy that powers our customers every day. During 2024, we continued to demonstrate operational excellence and a strategic vision that positions the company to create shareholder value for years to come.
2024 Compensation Highlights
2024 Annual Incentive Plan funded at 110% due to above-target consolidated operating EPS performance |
2022 Performance Grant paid at 8.8% of target primarily due to missed relative TSR goal and missed cumulative operating EPS goal |
100% of the CEO’s 2024 long-term incentive awards were performance-based
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 43
Business Highlights
Our 2024 business highlights include the following:
|
Achieved companywide OSHA recordable incident rate of 0.42 , the second-lowest rate on record, and had the second-lowest rate of 0.27 of injuries leading to lost days or restricted duty in company history |
|
|
Reduced carbon emissions from electric generation by 53% from 2005 through 2023, and reduced methane emissions from natural gas infrastructure operations by 50% from 2010 through 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed $46.3 million in 2024 to community causes through our Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation, our EnergyShare program and other sources |
|
|
Kept our rates affordable for our customers at 18% below the national average in Virginia and 13% below the national average in South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued to expand our companywide solar portfolio with more than 8,973 MW in service or under development |
|
|
Closed on the sale of our three gas distribution companies based in Cleveland, OH; Salt Lake City, UT; and Gastonia, NC, to Enbridge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provided reliable service to our customers — with customers having power 99.98% of the time, excluding major storms in the company’s Virginia and Carolinas service areas |
|
|
Closed on the sale of a 50% non-controlling interest in the CVOW commercial project to Stonepeak; the project remains on schedule |
Dominion Energy Virginia
Dominion Energy South Carolina
Financial Performance
* See Reconciliation of Reported Earnings (GAAP) to Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) in Appendix A.
44 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
O ur Compensation Elements
Our 2024 executive compensation program was constructed of four building blocks: base salary, AIP, LTIP and benefits. Each element served a distinct purpose. These complementary components appropriately balanced risk with reward and short-term goals with long-term strategies, while providing total compensation that is competitive with our peers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why We Pay This Element |
|
Key Characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To attract, motivate and retain talent |
|
For our NEOs, base salaries are generally targeted at the Compensation Peer Group median, subject to individual and companywide considerations
|
|
||
CEO |
|
Other NEOs
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
|
|
Other NEOs
|
|
To attract, motivate and retain talent
To incentivize officers to achieve the company’s short-term (annual) goals |
|
Variable pay dependent on achievement of short-term performance goals, primarily operating EPS |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance grant
|
|
To attract, motivate and retain talent To align officers’ long-term interests with those of our shareholders
To incentivize officers to achieve the company’s long-term goals |
|
Performance-based stock dependent on achievement of long-term performance goals, primarily relative TSR, operating EPS and non-carbon emitting generation; and company stock value
|
|
|||
CEO
|
|
Other NEOs
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Restricted stock with time-based vesting (equity) |
|
To attract, motivate and retain talent
To align officers’ long-term interests with those of our shareholders |
|
Variable pay dependent on company stock value |
|||||
CEO |
|
Other NEOs |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 45
Base Salary
Competitive base pay is necessary to attract, motivate and retain talent. For our NEOs, base salaries are generally targeted at the Compensation Peer Group median (see The Compensation Peer Group for a listing of our peer companies) , subject to individual and companywide considerations discussed under Compensation Philosophy and Individual Factors in Setting Compensation .
Effective January 1, 2024, Messrs. Ridge and Brown each received a salary increase of 15% in connection with the increased responsibilities in their new roles, to recognize their continued contributions to Dominion Energy and to better align their salaries with companies in the Compensation Peer Group.
The CTD Committee approved the following base salary increases as part of the annual merit process, effective March 1, 2024: 3.25% for Ms. Leopold and 10% for Mr. Baine. Mr. Blue did not receive a base salary increase for fiscal year 2024.
|
|
2023 Base
|
|
2024 Base
|
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Robert M. Blue |
|
|
$ |
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
747,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.00 |
% |
|
Diane Leopold |
|
|
|
933,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
963,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
747,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.00 |
% |
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
|
|
531,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
585,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
* Salary as of 12/31/2023
Annual Incentive Plan
The 2024 AIP is a cash-based program focused on short-term goals and is designed to:
• Tie interests of our shareholders, customers, communities and employees closely together; • Focus our workforce on company, operating group, team and individual goals that ultimately drive operational and financial results; • Reward strong annual earnings performance; |
|
• Reward safety, customer experience, reliability and compliance; • Emphasize teamwork by focusing on common goals; and • Provide a competitive total compensation opportunity. |
For the NEOs, the 2024 AIP was tied solely to achievement of predetermined consolidated operating EPS goals. However, the CTD Committee retained discretion to reduce the AIP payout of each NEO for any reason, including failure to satisfy operating and stewardship goals in the areas of safety, customer experience, reliability and compliance.
The CTD Committee calculated 2024 AIP payouts for the NEOs as follows:
Base Salary |
|
Target Award Percentage |
|
Consolidated Financial Goal Score* |
|
AIP Payout** |
* The consolidated financial goal score is based on consolidated operating EPS.
** As discussed below under Discretionary Operational Goals, the CTD Committee retains discretion to reduce, but not increase, the payout to an NEO in the event that certain operational goals are not achieved.
Target Award Percentage
Each NEO’s compensation opportunity under the AIP is a percentage of their base salary at year end. AIP target award percentages are set to be consistent with our intent to keep a significant portion of NEO compensation tied to our stock performance or other company goals, considering the items described above under Compensation Philosophy . The target annual award opportunities for Messrs. Ridge and Brown were increased from 70% to 90% for 2024 in connection with the increased responsibilities in their new roles, to recognize their continued contributions to Dominion Energy’s success and to better align their total compensation with companies in the Compensation Peer Group (see The Compensation Peer Group for a listing of our peer companies). No changes were made to the target annual award opportunities of the other NEOs in 2024. The target annual award opportunities for each of the NEOs is listed below.
46 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Name |
|
2024 AIP Target
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Blue |
|
|
130 |
% |
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
Diane Leopold |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
* As a percentage of base salary.
2024 AIP Metrics
Consolidated Financial Goal
For the NEOs, the AIP payout is determined by our consolidated operating EPS, which is our reported EPS determined in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for certain items as described in greater detail in Appendix A. We believe that this funding mechanism encourages behavior and performance that will help achieve the objectives listed above.
For the NEOs and all other employees, the CTD Committee set the consolidated operating EPS goal to provide for 100% AIP funding at $2.75 per share, inclusive of funding (as compared to $2.01 to $2.41 per share for the 2023 AIP funding target). The goal for maximum funding of 200% was set at $2.95 consolidated operating EPS, and the funding threshold, providing for 50% funding, was set at a consolidated operating EPS of $2.55 per share, with no funding if below that threshold.
|
|
Funding Level |
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Threshold |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
|
Target |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
2.95 |
|
|
Discretionary Operational Goals
The CTD Committee also retains the ability to exercise negative discretion to reduce an NEO’s AIP payout if certain pre-determined operational goals are not achieved. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2024, the CTD Committee established an operational scorecard for the AIP, with a maximum operational goal score of 100%. This scorecard included safety and customer experience goals that were shared by all participants, as well as goals related to reliability and compliance that varied by business area. The weightings for each of the operational companywide and business area specific goals are as indicated in the table below:
Scorecard Goals |
|
Scoring if All Targets Met |
|
|
|
Safety |
|
25% |
Customer Experience |
|
10% |
Reliability |
|
40% |
Compliance |
|
25% |
Total Points |
|
100% |
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 47
2024 Companywide Scorecard Goals
All the NEOs had the two companywide scorecard goals listed below:
Safety 25 points
|
Companywide safety goal focused on three areas:
1.
Reduction in companywide lost-days/restricted duty (LD/RD) rate, or achievement of targeted serious
injury and fatality (SIF) rate (5 points at target towards total safety goal);
2.
Reduction in companywide OSHA recordable incident rate (5 points); and
3.
Implementation of innovative safety initiatives by incorporating elements of the High Energy Control Assessment into each business segment’s pre-job briefing process (15 points).
A total of 5 extra points could have been earned under the Safety goal if the LD/RD and OSHA goals were exceeded (2.5 points for exceeding the LD/RD goal and 2.5 points for exceeding the OSHA goal); these extra points could be used only to offset misses in other non-safety goal categories. |
Customer Experience 10 points
|
Companywide customer experience goal had two components:
1.
All business units will identify two opportunities for targeted customer experience improvements and implement associated enhancements by year end (5 points at target towards total customer experience goal); and
2.
All business units will complete one key customer journey redesign aligned with net promoter score data and will implement two or more customer experience improvements by year end (5 points).
|
2024 Business Area Scorecard Goals
The reliability and compliance goals (40 points and 25 points, respectively) for Messrs. Blue, Ridge and Brown and Ms. Leopold, reflect a blend of operational reliability and compliance goals set for each of the company’s four major operational business areas (DEV, DESC, Gas Distribution and Nuclear). Goal scoring for Messrs. Blue, Ridge and Brown and Ms. Leopold was determined in proportion to the final goal score as achieved by each of the segment presidents. The business area scorecard goals for Mr. Baine aligned with his specific operating company of DEV.
Reliability 40 points
|
Reliability goal*:
1.
DEV:
Availability of generating units, distribution reliability, execution of transmission projects
2.
DESC:
Availability of generating units, distribution reliability, gas emergency onsite arrival time
3.
Gas Distribution:
Pipeline replacement projects at or below budget, infrastructure investment, execution of renewable natural gas projects
4.
Nuclear:
Fleet capacity factor, fleet equivalent forced outage rate, fleet refueling outage days, fleet consequential event failure, station event-free day clock resets
|
Compliance 25 points
|
Compliance goal*:
1.
DEV:
Tracking reportable environmental events, implementing new North American Electric Reliability (NERC) compliance technology solutions, meeting 2024 solar goals at budget
2.
DESC:
Tracking reportable environmental events, implementing new NERC compliance technology solutions, implement gas pipeline safety management system plan
3.
Gas:
Completing three pipeline safety management objectives, creating and implementing renewable natural gas compliance plans for all 2024 projects
4.
Nuclear:
No greater than green Nuclear Regulatory Commission violations, four or fewer fleet NERC findings or violations, fleet on-line radiation exposure, fleet reportable environmental event
|
* As President - Dominion Energy Virginia, Mr. Baine’s reliability and compliance goal scores were entirely based on the performance of the DEV component of those goals, whereas the scores for the other NEOs were based on a blend of each component of the goals due to their companywide responsibilities.
48 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
2024 AIP Results
Dominion Energy’s consolidated operating earnings for the year ended December 31, 2024 were $2.4 billion, or $2.77 per share*, which surpassed the target of $2.75 per share and, based on the pre-established funding range, resulted in AIP payout at 110%.
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
Maximum |
AIP Payout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Actual |
$2.77 |
110% |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
$2.55 |
|
$2.75 |
$2.95 |
||
|
|
|
|
||
50% |
|
100% |
200% |
* See Reconciliation of Reported Earnings (GAAP) to Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) in Appendix A.
CTD Committee Adjustments All discretionary operational goals were achieved and the CTD Committee did not make any negative adjustments to any NEOs’ AIP payout. Accordingly, final payouts were approved based on 110% consolidated financial goal achievement for all the NEOs. |
Final AIP Payout
The CTD Committee calculated final 2024 AIP payouts as shown below:
Name |
|
2024 Base
|
|
|
|
Target Award
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Goal Score |
|
|
|
Final AIP
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Blue |
|
$1,225,000 |
|
|
x |
|
130% |
|
|
x |
|
110% |
|
|
= |
|
$1,751,750 |
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
747,500 |
|
|
x |
|
90% |
|
|
x |
|
110% |
|
|
= |
|
740,025 |
|
Diane Leopold |
|
963,660 |
|
|
x |
|
90% |
|
|
x |
|
110% |
|
|
= |
|
954,023 |
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
747,500 |
|
|
x |
|
90% |
|
|
x |
|
110% |
|
|
= |
|
740,025 |
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
585,034 |
|
|
x |
|
70% |
|
|
x |
|
110% |
|
|
= |
|
450,476 |
|
Long-Term Incentive Program
Our LTIP focuses on Dominion Energy’s longer-term strategic goals and the retention of our executive officers. Each year, our NEOs receive a long-term incentive award consisting of two components. In recent years, LTIP awards have consisted of performance-based awards that vest based on the achievement of specified performance goals and restricted stock awards that vest based on continued employment for a specified period. In 2024, the performance-based awards were issued in the form of PSUs settled in cash and performance shares settled in stock. These performance-based awards are designed to encourage and reward executive officers for making decisions and investments that we believe will create and maintain long-term shareholder value and benefit our customers and communities. We also continued our practice of granting time-vested restricted stock awards, which we believe time-vested restricted stock awards serve as a strong retention tool and creates a focus on Dominion Energy’s stock price to further align the interests of executive officers with the interests of our shareholders, customers and communities.
2024 LTIP Overview
Following the completion of the business review, the CTD Committee approved parameters for the CEO’s 2024 LTIP award that differ from the parameters for the 2024 LTIP awards for the other NEOs. As shown in the following table, Mr. Blue’s 2024 LTIP award consists entirely of performance-based awards, 70% in the form of PSUs that will settle in cash and 30% in the form of performance shares that will settle in stock. For the other NEOs, 70% of the total target value consists of performance-based awards that will settle in cash or shares, while the remaining 30% consists of time-vested restricted stock.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 49
2024 Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunities
2024 LTIP Award for the CEO |
70% PSUs (settling in cash)
Three-year vesting period, subject to three performance goals:
• 50% weighting: Three-year (2024 – 2026) relative TSR, with 65 th percentile achievement required for target payout
• 40% weighting: C umulative operating EPS over a three-year period (2024 – 2026)
• 10% weighting: Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity
|
30% Performance Shares
Three-year performance period based on three-year (2024 – 2026) relative TSR (100% weighting), with 65 th percentile achievement required for target payout |
2024 LTIP Award for Other NEOs |
70%
PSUs (settling in cash) or
Three-year vesting period, subject to three performance goals:
• 50% weighting: Three-year (2024 – 2026) relative TSR, with 50 th percentile achievement required for target payout
• 40% weighting: C umulative operating EPS over a three-year period (2024 – 2026)
• 10% weighting: Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity
|
30% Restricted Stock
Three-year cliff vesting based solely on time |
Target Values for the 2024 LTIP Awards
The CTD Committee approves LTIP awards in January each year. In setting LTIP award levels for each NEO, the CTD Committee applies the concepts and individual factors discussed below under Individual Factors in Setting Compensation . In January 2024, the CTD Committee approved a $150,000 increase for Mr. Ridge, a $500,000 increase for Mr. Brown and a $250,000 increase for Mr. Baine to increase their at-risk compensation and further align their compensation with the market median. No changes were made to Mr. Blue’s or Ms. Leopold’s targets. The CTD Committee also considered each officer’s leadership experience and accomplishments, as well as Dominion Energy’s overall performance in determining any adjustments to each NEO’s LTIP target awards. The 2024 LTIP target awards for each of the NEOs were as follows:
Name |
|
2024 Target
|
|
2024
|
|
2024 Total Target
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Robert M. Blue* |
|
|
$ |
8,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,300,000 |
|
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
Diane Leopold |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
* Mr. Blue did not receive restricted stock as part of his 2024 LTIP award. Instead, his 2024 LTIP award consisted entirely of performance-based awards, with 70% of the total target value ($5,810,000) in the form of PSUs that will settle in cash at the end of the performance period and 30% of the total target value ($2,490,000) in the form of performance shares. See below under Mr. Blue’s 2024 Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunities for further details.
50 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
2024 Performance Grants
In January 2024, the CTD Committee approved performance-based awards for the NEOs in the form of PSUs and performance shares, effective February 26, 2024 (2024 Performance-Based Awards). For 2024, all the NEOs, except for Messrs. Ridge and Brown, were granted PSUs that will settle in cash at the end of the performance period. The 2024 Performance-Based Awards for Messrs. Ridge and Brown were granted as performance shares that will settle in shares as described below. For Mr. Blue, 70% of his 2024 Performance-Based Award was granted in the form of PSUs and 30% was granted in the form of performance shares. The performance period for each of the 2024 Performance-Based Awards commenced on January 1, 2024 and will end on December 31, 2026.
Each PSU granted in 2024 represents the right to receive, at settlement, an amount equal to the fair market value of one share of our common stock following satisfaction of the applicable vesting requirements. Each performance share represents the right to receive one share of our common stock following satisfaction of the applicable vesting requirements. The 2024 Performance-Based Awards were granted with a target number of units (in the case of PSUs) or shares (in the case of performance shares) with potential payouts ranging from 0% to 200% of such target based on Dominion Energy’s three-year (2024 – 2026) TSR relative to the companies in the 2024 Compensation Peer Group (weighted 50%); Dominion Energy’s cumulative operating EPS over a three-year (2024 – 2026) period (weighted 40%); and our Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity (NCGC) Performance (weighted 10%) as of December 31, 2026. In a change from the 2023 Performance Grants, the CTD Committee approved the elimination of the opportunity to earn a portion of the 2024 Performance-Based Award payout based on relative P/E ratio for all officers.
|
|
Three-Year Relative TSR |
|
Cumulative Operating EPS |
Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity Performance |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% |
|
40% |
|
10% |
|
|
|
Three-year relative TSR is the difference between the value of a share of common stock at the beginning (the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) of the first 20 trading days of the performance period) and end (the VWAP of the last 20 trading days of the performance period) of the three-year performance period (2024 — 2026), plus dividends paid as if reinvested in stock. |
|
Cumulative operating EPS is the sum of the company’s operating EPS for each of the fiscal years during the performance period. |
|
The NCGC Performance metric measures the company’s wind, solar, nuclear and conventional hydro generation capacity as a percentage of its total generation capacity. |
|
|
|
The three-year TSR metric was selected to focus our officers on long-term shareholder value when developing and implementing strategic plans and to reward management based on the achievement of three-year TSR levels relative to the Compensation Peer Group. |
|
Cumulative operating EPS was selected to reward officers for focusing on cost control and revenue enhancement. In return, this benefits our shareholders through strong stock price performance. |
|
The NCGC Performance metric was selected to ensure officers remain focused on the company’s long-term environmental goals and to reward management as they achieve these complex emission reduction efforts, which are expected to enhance long-term shareholder value. |
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 51
Three-Year Relative TSR (50% weighting). The three-year (2024 – 2026) relative TSR targets and corresponding payout scores for the 2024 Performance-Based Awards for NEOs (excluding Mr. Blue) are as follows:
Relative TSR Performance Percentile Ranking |
|
Goal Achievement %* |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 th or above |
|
|
|
200 |
% |
|
50 th |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
25 th |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Below 25 th |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
* Relative TSR weighting is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages within a quartile.
The members of the Compensation Peer Group used to measure performance under the 2024 Performance-Based Awards are listed below under The Compensation Peer Group .
Three-Year Cumulative Operating EPS (40% weighting). The three-year (2024 – 2026) cumulative operating EPS targets and corresponding payout scores for the 2024 Performance-Based Awards for all NEOs (including Mr. Blue) are as follows:
Cumulative Operating EPS Performance |
|
Goal Achievement %* |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum ($10.52 or above) |
|
|
|
200 |
% |
|
Target ($9.74) |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Threshold ($8.77) |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Below Threshold |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
* Cumulative operating EPS performance is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages within a quartile.
NCGC Performance (10% weighting). The NCGC Performance goal measures the company’s wind, solar, nuclear and conventional hydro generation capacity as a percentage of its total generation capacity (Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity Percentage). The company’s Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity Percentage is determined as of the last day of the performance period and is calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity* |
|
÷ |
|
Net Generation Capacity** |
|
= |
|
Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity means the company’s wind, solar, nuclear and conventional hydro generation capacity. Capacity means MW capacity from (x) in service facilities as of the last day of the performance period plus (y) facilities proposed to be in service by the last day of the performance period and submitted for regulatory approval (even if subsequently rejected). A facility will only be counted once in any given performance period. MWs that are not intermittent resources are defined as installed summer maximum capacity. MWs for intermittent renewable resources are defined as the original installed or proposed nameplate capacity. MWs included in the calculation will be those owned by or serving Dominion Energy regulated entities (by contract or agreement), and include the following: cost of service, ringfence projects, power purchase agreements, distributed energy resources and behind the meter generation (non-utility generators).
** Net Generation Capacity means the company’s total generation capacity minus pumped hydro/battery storage.
The NCGC targets and corresponding payout scores for the 2024 Performance-Based Awards (including for Mr. Blue) are as follows:
Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity Percentage |
|
Goal Achievement %* |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum (50% or above) |
|
|
|
200 |
% |
|
Target Range (38% - 45%) |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Threshold (35%) |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Below Threshold |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
* NCGC Performance weighting is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages within a quartile.
The NCGC Performance goal and corresponding payout scores are subject to possible revisions or adjustments, at the CTD Committee’s sole discretion, if generation retirements do not occur as currently planned during the performance period.
52 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Form of Performance-Based Awards
Because officers are expected to retain ownership of shares upon vesting of restricted stock awards, as explained below under Share Ownership Guidelines , the performance-based awards issued as PSUs that settle in cash balances the LTIP and allows a portion of the LTIP award to be accessible to our NEOs during their employment. Generally, officers who have not yet achieved 50% of their targeted share ownership guideline receive performance-based awards that will settle in shares at the end of the performance period instead of cash. Performance-based awards that settle in shares have the same performance goals and other terms as performance-based awards that settle in cash but will be paid in shares of our common stock instead of cash. Dividend equivalents accrue during the performance period and will be paid out at the end of the performance period. All of our NEOs (other than Messrs. Ridge and Brown) had achieved more than 50% of their full targeted share ownership guidelines as of the February 26, 2024 grant date and received the 2024 Performance-Based Awards in the form of PSUs that will settle in cash. The 2024 Performance-Based Awards for Messrs. Ridge and Brown will consist of performance shares that will settle in shares.
Mr. Blue’s 2024 Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunities
In January 2024, the CTD Committee approved Mr. Blue’s 2024 LTIP award, consisting entirely of performance-based awards, with 70% of the total target value ($5,810,000) in the form of PSUs that will settle in cash and 30% of the total target value ($2,490,000) in the form of performance shares that will settle in stock. Each of the grants has a three-year performance period commencing on January 1, 2024 and ending December 31, 2026. Payout of the PSUs will be between 0% and 200% of target, while payout of the performance shares will be between 0% and 125% of target. The performance metrics for the PSUs are three-year relative TSR (50%); three-year cumulative operating EPS (40%); and NCGC Performance (10%). The performance shares are subject to a sole performance metric of three-year relative TSR. For each of the PSU and performance share awards, three-year relative TSR performance at the 65 th percentile is needed for an at-target payout. Overall, 100% of Mr. Blue’s 2024 LTIP award is performance-based, with 93% of the total target award value based on either relative TSR (65% of target value) or cumulative operating EPS (28% of target value).
2024 Performance-Based Award Goals for Mr. Blue
The following tables provide the percentile rankings and corresponding payout scores for each of the performance metrics underlying Mr. Blue’s 2024 LTIP awards.
Three-Year Relative TSR (50% weighting). The three-year (2024 – 2026) relative TSR targets and corresponding payout scores for Mr. Blue’s 2024 PSU award are as follows:
Relative TSR Performance Percentile Ranking |
|
Goal Achievement %* |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 th or above |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
65 th |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
25 th |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Below 25 th |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
* Relative TSR weighting is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages within a quartile.
Three-Year Cumulative Operating EPS (40% weighting). The three-year (2024 – 2026) cumulative operating EPS targets and corresponding payout scores for Mr. Blue’s 2024 PSU award are as follows:
Cumulative Operating EPS Performance |
|
Goal Achievement %* |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum ($10.52 or above) |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
Target ($9.74) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Threshold ($8.77) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Below Threshold |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
* Cumulative operating EPS performance weighting is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages within a quartile.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 53
NCGC Performance (10% weighting). The NCGC targets and corresponding payout scores for Mr. Blue’s 2024 PSU award are as follows:
Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Capacity Percentage |
|
Goal Achievement %* |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum (50% or above) |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
Target Range (38% - 45%) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Threshold (35%) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Below Threshold |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
* NCGC Performance weighting is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages within a quartile.
Three-Year Relative TSR (100% weighting). The three-year (2024 – 2026) relative TSR targets and corresponding payout scores for Mr. Blue’s 2024 performance share award are as follows:
Relative TSR Performance Percentile Ranking |
|
Goal Achievement %* |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 th or above |
|
|
125 |
% |
|
65 th |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Below 25 th |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
* Relative TSR weighting is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages for scores falling between the 25 th and 65 th percentiles or between the 65 th and 75 th percentiles.
2024 Restricted Stock Grants
All NEOs, except for Mr. Blue, received a time-vested restricted stock grant in February 2024, based on the dollar value set forth above in the table under Target Values for the 2024 LTIP Awards . The number of shares awarded was determined by dividing the dollar value above by the closing price of Dominion Energy’s common stock on February 26, 2024. Each of these grants cliff vests in three years on February 1, 2027. Dividends are paid to officers during the restricted period, and they are entitled to vote the shares, prior to vesting.
2022 Performance Grants Payout
In January 2022, the CTD Committee approved performance grants for the NEOs (2022 Performance Grants). For NEOs other than Mr. Ridge, the 2022 Performance Grants were made in the form of cash performance grants, effective February 15, 2022, for the three-year performance period commencing January 1, 2022 and ending December 31, 2024. Mr. Ridge, who had not achieved 50% of his requisite share ownership guidelines at the time of the grant, received his 2022 Performance Grant in the form of a performance-based stock award, with performance goals and other terms identical to the cash-based performance grants, but denominated and payable in shares of our common stock instead of cash.
In January 2025, payouts were made under the 2022 Performance Grants. The 2022 Performance Grants were based on three goals: TSR for the three-year period ending December 31, 2024, relative to the companies in the Compensation Peer Group as of the February 15, 2022 grant date, as adjusted for mergers and other similar events occurring during the performance period (weighted 50%), cumulative operating EPS over the performance period (weighted 40%) and NCGC Performance for the same three-year period (weighted 10%). The members of the Compensation Peer Group used to measure performance under the 2022 Performance Grants were as follows:
• Ameren Corporation • American Electric Power Company, Inc. • CenterPoint Energy, Inc. • CMS Energy Corporation • Consolidated Edison, Inc. • Duke Energy Corporation |
|
• Edison International • Entergy Corporation • Eversource Energy • Exelon Corporation • FirstEnergy Corp. • NextEra Energy, Inc. |
|
• NiSource Inc. • Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated • The Southern Company • WEC Energy Group • Xcel Energy Inc. |
54 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Relative TSR (50% weighting). The relative TSR targets and corresponding payout scores for the 2022 Performance Grants were as follows:
Relative TSR Performance Percentile Ranking |
|
Goal Achievement %* |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 th or above |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
50 th |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
25 th |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Below 25 th |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
* Relative TSR weighting is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages within a quartile.
The 2022 Performance Grants provided that regardless of the company’s relative TSR performance, the following could have been earned: (i) an additional payment of 25% of the TSR percentage if the company’s P/E ratio was at or above the 50 th percentile and below the top third of the group of companies (inclusive of the company) used to measure relative TSR performance or (ii) an additional payment of 50% of the TSR percentage if the company’s P/E ratio was at or above the top third of the group of companies (inclusive of the company) used to measure relative TSR performance. The CTD Committee was able to reduce or eliminate payment of the relative P/E ratio modifier in its sole discretion and the overall percentage payment under the entire performance grant could not exceed 200% of the target amount.
Actual relative TSR performance for the 2022 – 2024 period was the second lowest in the peer group, which produced a relative TSR goal achievement percentage of 0%. Dominion Energy’s P/E ratio of 15.9 for the three-year performance period was in the 35 th percentile of the Compensation Peer Group, resulting in 0 percentage points being added to the TSR goal achievement percentage. For this purpose, P/E ratio was determined by the CTD Committee as the forward price-earnings ratio (i.e., the share price on the last day of the performance period divided by the expected EPS for the year following the end of the performance period) reported as of the last day of the performance period.
|
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Goal Achievement |
|
Goal Achievement with P/E Ratio Modifier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative TSR Percentile |
Actual |
|
5.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
25 th |
|
50 th |
|
85 th |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Year Cumulative Operating EPS (40% weighting). The three-year (2022 – 2024) cumulative operating EPS targets and corresponding payout scores for the 2022 Performance Grant for the NEOs are as follows:
Cumulative Operating EPS Performance |
|
Goal Achievement %* |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum ($14.65 or above) |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
Target ($12.86 - $13.12) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Threshold ($11.70) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Below Threshold |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
* Cumulative operating EPS weighting is interpolated between the top and bottom of the percentages within a quartile.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 55
Actual cumulative operating EPS performance for the 2022-2024 period was $8.87*, which produced a final goal achievement percentage of 0%. The 0% payout for this metric occurred primarily because the cumulative operating EPS targets were established prior to the companywide business review that was completed in early 2024 and resulted in significant changes to the company’s earnings potential.
|
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
Maximum |
Goal Achievement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Operating EPS |
Actual |
$8.87* |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
$11.70 |
|
$12.86 - $13.12 |
$14.65 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The CTD Committee approved cumulative operating EPS performance for purposes of the 2022 Performance Grants and the corresponding 0% final goal achievement percentage prior to the accounting adjustments described in Appendix A, Reconciliation of Reported Earnings (GAAP) to Operating Earnings (non-GAAP). Had approval occurred after such adjustments were made, the final goal achievement percentage would have still been 0%, with a cumulative operating ESP performance for the 2022 – 2024 period of $7.88 rather than $8.87.
NCGC Performance (10% weighting). The NCGC targets and corresponding payout scores for the 2022 Performance Grant for the NEOs are as follows:
The actual NCGC Percentage as of December 31, 2024 was 35.4%, which produced a final goal achievement percentage of 88.1% mainly due to fewer solar projects moving forward during the performance period than anticipated.
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
Maximum |
Goal Achievement |
|
|||||
NCGC Performance |
|
Actual |
35.4% |
|
88.1% |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
33.3% |
|
36.0% - 39.5% |
42.8% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the goal achievement, the CTD Committee approved an 8.8% payout for the 2022 Performance Grants, determined as follows:
Measure |
|
Goal
|
|
|
|
Goal
|
|
|
|
Payout % |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Relative TSR with P/E Ratio modifier |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
× |
|
|
— |
% |
|
|
= |
|
|
— |
% |
|
Cumulative Operating EPS |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
× |
|
|
— |
% |
|
|
= |
|
|
— |
% |
|
NCGC Performance |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
× |
|
|
88.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
|
Combined Overall Performance Score 8.8% |
The resulting payout amounts for the NEOs, other than Mr. Ridge, for the cash-based 2022 Performance Grants were as follows:
Name |
|
2022
|
|
|
|
|
Overall
|
|
|
|
Calculated
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Robert M. Blue |
|
$ |
4,980,000 |
|
|
× |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
= |
|
$ |
438,240 |
|
Diane Leopold |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
× |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
= |
|
|
105,600 |
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
× |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
= |
|
|
39,600 |
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
× |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
= |
|
|
26,400 |
|
56 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
The corresponding payouts for Mr. Ridge’s stock-based 2022 Performance Grant were as follows:
Name |
|
2022
|
|
|
|
Overall
|
|
|
|
Calculated
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Steven D. Ridge |
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
× |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
= |
|
|
176 |
|
|
Employee and Executive Benefits
Benefit plans and limited perquisites compose the fourth element of our compensation program. These benefits serve as a retention tool and reward long-term employment.
Retirement Plans
All eligible non-union employees participate in a 401(k) plan that includes a company match, and, if hired prior to July 1, 2021, and unless they have elected to participate solely in our 401(k) plan, a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan). Effective July 1, 2021, we also adopted a nonqualified defined contribution plan, the Dominion Energy, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP), to allow eligible officers to defer salary in excess of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) limits, annual bonuses and long-term incentive awards, and, effective May 10, 2023, retention awards. Officers who participate in our 401(k) plan are unable to save a proportionate amount of their eligible compensation for retirement within the plan, due to limits that the IRS imposes on qualified plans; the DCP allows the officers to bridge this gap. Officers who have deferred salary above IRS limits to the DCP receive a company match on those deferrals at the same rates and subject to the same vesting conditions as under our 401(k) plan. These matching contributions are credited to them under the DCP unless they elect to receive them as a taxable cash payment. In addition, officers whose matching contributions under our 401(k) plan are limited by the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and who do not participate in the salary deferral program under the DCP receive a taxable cash payment each year to make them whole for the company match that is lost because of these limits. Employees hired after July 1, 2021, as well as employees hired prior to that date who have elected to participate solely in our 401(k) plan, are also eligible to receive nonelective company contributions under the 401(k) plan in addition to any matching contributions. Eligible officers may receive excess nonelective contributions under the DCP to the extent their 401(k) nonelective contributions are subject to IRS limits, at the same rates and subject to the same vesting conditions as under the 401(k) plan. The company matching and nonelective contributions to the 401(k) plan and the DCP and the cash payments of company matching contributions above the Code limits for the NEOs are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table .
We also maintain two defined benefit nonqualified retirement plans for our executive officers, the Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan (BRP) and the frozen Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (Frozen ESRP). The BRP helps us to retain executive talent by restoring benefits that cannot be paid under the Pension Plan due to Code limits. Due to these Code limits, and because a more substantial portion of total compensation for our officers is paid as incentive compensation than for other employees, the Pension Plan and 401(k) plan alone would produce a lower percentage of replacement income in retirement for officers than these plans will provide for other employees.
The Frozen ESRP provides a benefit that covers a portion (25%) of final base salary and target annual incentive compensation (determined at the earlier of a participant’s retirement or October 1, 2019) to partially make up for this gap in retirement income. Effective July 1, 2013, the Frozen ESRP was closed to any new participants. Messrs. Ridge and Brown did not become officers until after July 2013 and, therefore, do not participate in the Frozen ESRP. Effective October 1, 2019, due to variations in our officer eligibility for the plan and changing market trends, we froze future benefit accruals under the Frozen ESRP as well. Benefits under the Frozen ESRP will continue to be credited with annual cost-of-living increases as described below under Pension Benefits .
The Pension Plan, 401(k) plan, BRP and Frozen ESRP do not include long-term incentive compensation in benefit calculations and, therefore, a significant portion of the potential compensation for our officers is excluded from calculation in any retirement plan benefit. As consideration for the benefits earned under the BRP and Frozen ESRP, all officers agree to comply with confidentiality and one-year non-competition requirements set forth in the plan documents following their retirement or other termination of employment. The present value of the accumulated benefits under these retirement plans is disclosed in the Pension Benefits table and the terms of the plans are more fully explained in the narrative following that table.
For purposes of calculating benefits under the BRP, additional age and service may be earned under the terms of an officer’s Employment Continuity Agreement in the event of a change in control, as described in Change in Control under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control .
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 57
Other Benefit Programs
Our officers participate in the benefit programs available to other Dominion Energy employees. The core benefit programs generally include medical, dental and vision benefit plans, a health savings account, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, group term life insurance, travel accident coverage, long-term disability coverage and a paid time off program.
We also maintain an executive life insurance program for certain officers, fully insured by individual policies, that provides death benefits at a fixed amount depending on an officer’s salary tier. This life insurance coverage is in addition to the group term insurance provided to all employees. The officer is the owner of the policy and the company makes premium payments until the later of 10 years from enrollment date or the date the officer attains age 64. Officers are taxed on the premiums paid by the company. The premiums for these policies are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. The executive life insurance program was closed to new officers effective December 23, 2023.
Perquisites
We provide a limited number of perquisites for our officers to enable them to perform their duties and responsibilities as efficiently as possible and to minimize distractions. The CTD Committee annually reviews the perquisites to ensure they are an effective and efficient use of corporate resources. We believe the benefits we receive from offering these perquisites outweigh the costs of providing them. We offer the following perquisites to all officers:
Other than costs associated with comprehensive executive officer physical exams (which are exempt from taxation under the Code), these perquisites are fully taxable to officers. There is no tax gross-up for imputed income on perquisites, except for certain benefits provided through the company’s relocation program.
Employment Continuity Agreements
Dominion Energy has entered into Employment Continuity Agreements with all officers to ensure continuity in the event of a change in control of the company. We believe these agreements are consistent with competitive practice for our peer companies, and they protect the company in the event of an anticipated or actual change in control. In a time of transition, it is critical to protect shareholder value by retaining and continuing to motivate the company’s core management team. In a change in control situation, workloads typically increase dramatically, outside competitors are more likely to attempt to recruit top performers away from the company, and officers and other key employees may consider other opportunities when faced with uncertainties at their own company. The Employment Continuity Agreements provide security and protection to officers in such circumstances for the long-term benefit of the company and its shareholders.
In determining appropriate compensation and benefits payable upon a change in control, the company evaluated peer group and general practices and considered the levels of protection necessary to retain officers in such situations. The Employment Continuity Agreements are double-trigger, meaning they require both a change in control and a qualifying termination of employment to trigger most benefits. The specific terms of the Employment Continuity Agreements are discussed below in Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control .
Other than the Employment Continuity Agreements, Dominion Energy does not have comprehensive employment agreements or severance agreements with its NEOs.
58 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
O ur Process
The CTD Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving NEO compensation and our overall executive compensation program. Each year, the CTD Committee reviews a comprehensive analysis of the executive compensation program, including the elements of each NEO’s compensation, with input from senior management and the CTD Committee’s independent compensation consultant. As part of its assessment, the CTD Committee reviews the performance of the CEO and other executive officers, reviews succession planning for the company’s senior officers, reviews executive officer share ownership guidelines and compliance and establishes compensation programs designed to achieve Dominion Energy’s objectives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVIEW |
|
EVALUATE |
|
APPROVE |
|
|
CTD Committee annually reviews NEO
|
CTD Committee evaluates the performance of
|
CTD Committee approves
|
|||
|
|
|
|
The CTD Committee evaluates each NEO’s base salary, total cash compensation (base salary plus target AIP award) and total direct compensation (base salary plus target AIP award and target LTIP award) against data from our Compensation Peer Group. To ensure the compensation levels are appropriately competitive and consistent with the company’s overall strategy, the CTD Committee considers the peer data together with the considerations described under Individual Factors in Setting Compensation . Additionally, the CTD Committee reviews general market survey data for each position as part of the review process. Neither the peer comparison nor the individual factors are assigned any specific weighting. As part of its analysis, the CTD Committee also considers Dominion Energy’s progress on our commitment to Net Zero, Dominion Energy’s size, including market capitalization and complexity compared to the companies in our Compensation Peer Group, as well as the tenure of the NEO as compared to executive officers in a similar position in a Compensation Peer Group company.
Individual Factors in Setting Compensation
In addition to Dominion Energy’s goals and performance, the CTD Committee considers several factors when setting compensation for each NEO, including:
|
|
|
Performance Job and leadership performance |
Job Responsibilities
Scope, complexity and significance
|
Internal Pay Equity Internal pay equity, such as relative importance of a position or an individual officer to Dominion Energy’s strategy and success
|
Experience Experience, background and tenure |
Retention
Retention and market competitive
|
Succession Planning The executive officer’s role in any succession plan for other key positions |
|
|
|
These factors are important considerations in setting base pay and other compensation opportunities.
The Compensation Peer Group
The CTD Committee uses the Compensation Peer Group to assess the competitiveness of the compensation of our NEOs. This same group is used to evaluate the relative TSR performance of the company for purposes of our 2024 Performance Grants.
In the fall of each year, with input and advice from its independent consultant, the CTD Committee reviews and approves the Compensation Peer Group. In selecting the Compensation Peer Group, we identify companies in our industry that compete for executive talent and investment capital and have similar business models and strategic focus. We screen this group based on size and usually eliminate companies that fall outside of a reasonable size range as compared to Dominion Energy in revenues, assets, or market capitalization. For 2024, we replaced NiSource, Inc. with DTE Energy Company.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 59
Dominion Energy’s 2024 Compensation Peer Group was composed of the following companies:
• Ameren Corporation
•
American Electric Power
• CenterPoint Energy, Inc. • CMS Energy Corporation • Consolidated Edison, Inc. • DTE Energy Company |
|
• Duke Energy Corporation • Edison International • Entergy Corporation • Eversource Energy • Exelon Corporation • FirstEnergy Corp. |
|
• NextEra Energy, Inc. • Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated • The Southern Company • WEC Energy Group • Xcel Energy Inc. |
The CTD Committee and management use the Compensation Peer Group to: (i) compare Dominion Energy’s stock and financial performance against these peers using a number of different metrics and time periods to evaluate how we are performing; (ii) analyze compensation practices within our industry; (iii) evaluate peer company practices and determine peer ranges for base pay, annual incentive pay, long-term incentive pay and total direct compensation, both generally and for specific positions; and (iv) to compare our benefits and perquisites. In setting the levels for base pay, annual incentive pay, long-term incentive pay and total direct compensation, the CTD Committee also takes into consideration Dominion Energy’s size compared with the median of the Compensation Peer Group and the complexity of its business. As compared to the Compensation Peer Group, as of December 31, 2024, Dominion Energy ranked 5 th in market capitalization, 7 th in assets and 8 th in revenues, as reported by Bloomberg.
For purposes of the 2024 Performance-Based Awards, the comparison companies may be adjusted during the performance period as follows: (i) in the event of a merger, acquisition or business combination of a comparison company with or by another comparison company, the surviving entity will remain and the non-surviving entity will cease to be a comparison company (provided that the latter will be retroactively reinstated as a comparison company if the proposed transaction is subsequently terminated before the relative TSR performance is calculated); (ii) in the event it is publicly announced that a comparison company will be acquired by an entity that is not a comparison company, or in the event a “going private transaction” is publicly announced where the comparison company will not be the surviving entity or will otherwise no longer be publicly traded, the company will cease to be a comparison company (provided that the company will be retroactively reinstated as a comparison company if the proposed transaction is subsequently terminated before the relative TSR performance is calculated); (iii) in the event of a spinoff, divestiture or sale of a substantial portion of assets of a comparison company, the company will no longer be a comparison company if such company’s reported revenue (in its GAAP accounts) for the four most recently reported quarters ending on or before the last day of the performance period falls below 40% of the company’s reported revenue (in its GAAP accounts) for the four most recently reported quarters ending on or before the last day of the performance period; and (iv) in the event of a bankruptcy of a comparison company, such company will remain a comparison company and its stock price will continue to be tracked for purposes of relative TSR performance. If such company liquidates, it will remain a comparison company and its stock price will be reduced to zero for the remaining performance period.
Survey and Other Data
Survey compensation data and information on local companies with whom we compete for talent and other companies with market capitalization comparable to Dominion Energy are used only to provide a general understanding of compensation practices and trends, not as benchmarks for compensation decisions. The CTD Committee considers individual and company-specific factors, including internal pay equity, along with data from the Compensation Peer Group, in establishing compensation opportunities. The CTD Committee believes this reflects Dominion Energy’s specific needs in its distinct competitive market and with respect to its size and complexity versus its peers.
60 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
CEO Compensation Relative to Other NEOs
Our CEO generally participates in the same compensation programs and receives compensation based on the same philosophy and factors as the other NEOs. Application of the same philosophy and factors to the CEO’s position results in overall CEO compensation that is higher than the compensation of the other NEOs. The CEO’s compensation is commensurate with his greater responsibilities and decision-making authority, broader scope of duties encompassing the entirety of the company (as compared to the other NEOs who are responsible for significant but distinct areas within the company) and his overall responsibility for corporate strategy. The CEO’s compensation also reflects his role as our principal corporate representative to investors, customers, regulators, analysts, legislators, the industry, the communities in which we operate and the media.
We consider CEO compensation trends as compared to the next highest-paid officer, as well as to our executive officers as a group, over a multi-year period to monitor the ratio of the CEO’s pay relative to the pay of other executive officers. The CTD Committee did not make any adjustments to the compensation of any NEOs based on this review for 2024.
O ur Compensation Practices and Policies
Annual Compensation Risk Review
Dominion Energy’s management, including Dominion Energy’s senior risk officer and other executive officers, annually reviews the overall structure of the company’s executive compensation program and policies to ensure that they are consistent with effective management of key enterprise risks and that they do not encourage executive officers to take unnecessary or excessive risks that could threaten the value of the enterprise. With respect to the programs and policies that apply to our NEOs, this review includes analysis of:
Among the factors considered in management’s assessment are: (i) the balance of our overall program design, including the mix of cash and equity compensation; (ii) the mix of fixed and variable compensation; (iii) the balance of short-term and long-term objectives of our incentive compensation; (iv) the performance metrics, performance targets, threshold performance requirements and capped payouts related to our incentive compensation; (v) our clawback provisions on incentive compensation; (vi) our share ownership guidelines, including share ownership levels, retention practices and prohibitions on hedging, pledging and other derivative transactions related to Dominion Energy common stock; (vii) the CTD Committee’s ability to exercise negative discretion to reduce the amount of the annual and long-term incentive awards; and (viii) internal controls and oversight structures in place at Dominion Energy.
Based on management’s review, the CTD Committee believes the company’s well-balanced mix of salary and short-term and long-term incentives, as well as the performance metrics that are included in the incentive programs, are appropriate, consistent with the company’s risk management practices and overall strategies, and do not encourage our executive officers, including the NEOs, to take unnecessary or excessive risks.
Share Ownership Guidelines
We require executive officers to own and retain significant amounts of Dominion Energy common stock to align their interests with those of our shareholders by promoting a long-term focus through share ownership. The guidelines ensure that management maintains a personal stake in the company through significant equity investment in the company.
Targeted ownership levels are the following values:
Position |
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Chair, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
6 x salary |
|
Executive Vice President – Dominion Energy |
|
4 x salary |
|
President – Dominion Energy Subsidiaries |
|
3 x salary |
|
Senior Vice President – Dominion Energy & Subsidiaries |
|
3 x salary |
|
Vice President – Dominion Energy & Subsidiaries |
|
2 x salary |
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 61
The levels of ownership reflect the increasing level of responsibility for each officer’s position. Shares owned by an officer and their immediate family members, shares held under company benefit plans and unvested time-based restricted stock count toward the ownership targets. Performance-based stock and shares underlying stock options do not count toward the ownership targets until the shares vest or the options are exercised.
Until an officer meets their ownership target, an officer must retain all after-tax shares from the vesting of restricted stock and performance-based stock awards. We refer to shares held by an officer that are more than 15% above their ownership target as qualifying excess shares. Unvested time-based restricted stock is excluded from the officer’s share ownership balance when determining qualifying excess shares. An officer may sell, gift or transfer qualifying excess shares at any time, subject to insider-trading rules and other policy provisions, if the sale, gift or transfer does not cause an executive officer to fall below their ownership target.
To encourage officers to meet their share ownership guidelines and facilitate their ownership of company stock, the company offers an Executive Stock Purchase Tool Kit program (Tool Kit) to any officer who is subject to share ownership guidelines and is not currently in compliance with their guideline because of new hire, promotion or any other reason. The Tool Kit provides eligible officers with an opportunity to purchase shares of company stock at a discount, either by electing to exchange a portion (up to 100%) of the officer’s AIP payout for shares of company stock or by purchasing shares through Dominion Energy Direct ® . An officer who elects to participate in the Tool Kit receives an additional payment equal to 25% of the amount they have elected to invest in shares of company stock. The additional payment, net of applicable taxes, is also paid or required to be invested in shares of company stock. Tool Kit shares are issued under the company’s 2024 Incentive Compensation Plan.
The CTD Committee annually reviews the share ownership guidelines and monitors compliance by executive officers, both individually and by the officer group as a whole.
Anti-Hedging & Pledging Policy
We prohibit our directors, officers and employees and their designees from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) or otherwise engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or that are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of shares of our common stock or other equity securities, granted to them as compensation or otherwise held, directly or indirectly, by them. Our directors and officers are also prohibited from using margin accounts and pledging shares as collateral.
Recovery of Incentive Compensation
Effective October 2, 2023, Dominion Energy implemented its Policy for Recovery of Previously Awarded Compensation (the Clawback Policy), which is intended to comply with the provisions of Exchange Act Section 10D, Exchange Act Rule 10D-1 and Section 303A.14 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, which requires companies to adopt a formal policy outlining the recovery of incentive-based compensation in the event of certain accounting restatements. The Board has delegated the administration of the Clawback Policy to the CTD Committee which has full and final authority to make all determinations under the Clawback Policy.
The Clawback Policy applies to all incentive-based compensation received by our executive officers after the effective date of the policy. In the event of a triggering accounting restatement, the CTD Committee is tasked with recovering in a reasonably prompt timeframe all incentive-based compensation received by a covered executive officer during the applicable recovery period in excess of the compensation that would have been received had the compensation been determined using the restated amounts.
Additionally, Dominion Energy’s Corporate Governance Guidelines authorize the Board to seek recovery of cash and equity performance-based compensation paid to officers who are found to be personally responsible for fraud or intentional misconduct that causes a restatement of financial results filed with the SEC. Our AIP and LTIP grant documents include a broader clawback provision that authorizes the CTD Committee, in its discretion and based on facts and circumstances, to recoup AIP and LTIP grant payouts from any employee whose fraudulent or intentional misconduct: (i) directly causes or partially causes the need for a restatement of a financial statement; or (ii) relates to or materially affects the company’s operations or the employee’s duties at the company. The company reserves the right to recover a payout by seeking repayment from the employee by reducing the amount that would otherwise be payable to the employee under another company benefit plan or compensation program to the extent permitted by applicable law, by withholding future incentive compensation, or any combination of these actions.
All clawback provisions are in addition to, and not in lieu of, other actions the company may take to remedy or discipline misconduct, including termination of employment or a legal action for breach of fiduciary duty, and any actions imposed by law enforcement agencies.
62 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Tax Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1 million that we pay to our CEO, CFO, our next three most highly compensated officers and any other individual who has served as one of our covered executive officers after 2016. Compensation decisions for our NEOs are driven by market competitiveness and the other factors described above in this CD&A and the CTD Committee approves non-deductible compensation whenever it believes that corporate objectives justify the cost of being unable to deduct such compensation.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
We measure and recognize compensation expense in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) guidance for stock-based payments, which requires that compensation expense relating to stock-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The CTD Committee considers the accounting treatment of equity and performance-based compensation when approving awards.
Timing of Certain Equity Grants
The CTD
C ompensation and Talent Development Committee Report
The CTD Committee is responsible for the oversight of Dominion Energy’s compensation programs and compensation of Dominion Energy’s executives per the CTD Committee’s charter. In preparation for filing this Proxy Statement, the CTD Committee reviewed and discussed the preceding Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on this review and discussion, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into Dominion Energy’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Robert H. Spilman, Jr., Chair
Mark J. Kington
Joseph M. Rigby
Susan N. Story
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 63
E xecutive Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table – An Overview
The Summary Compensation Table provides information in accordance with SEC requirements regarding compensation earned by our NEOs, stock awards made to our NEOs, as well as amounts accrued or accumulated during years reported with respect to retirement plans and other items. The NEOs include our CEO, our CFO and our three other most highly compensated officers who are deemed to be executive officers by our Board pursuant to SEC rules other than our CEO and CFO.
The following highlights some of the disclosures contained in this table.
64 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Summary Compensation Table
The following table presents information concerning compensation paid or earned by our NEOs for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 as well as the grant date fair value of stock awards and changes in pension value.
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary (1) |
|
Bonus (2) |
|
Stock
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Change in
|
|
All Other
|
|
SEC Total |
|
|
Realized Pay
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Robert M. Blue |
2024 |
$ |
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,526,987 |
|
$ |
2,189,990 |
|
$ |
795,805 |
|
$ |
166,843 |
|
$ |
12,904,625 |
|
|
$ |
6,510,494 |
|
|
Chair, President and |
2023 |
|
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
2,084,904 |
|
|
1,528,800 |
|
|
1,250,219 |
|
|
189,912 |
|
|
6,278,835 |
|
|
|
5,988,985 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
2022 |
|
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
3,320,036 |
|
|
2,023,514 |
|
|
10,107 |
|
|
216,328 |
|
|
6,794,985 |
|
|
|
4,426,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Steven D. Ridge |
2024 |
|
747,500 |
|
|
|
|
1,713,871 |
|
|
740,025 |
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
102,508 |
|
|
3,307,146 |
|
|
|
1,810,170 |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
2023 |
|
641,667 |
|
|
|
|
1,033,958 |
|
|
436,800 |
|
|
3,621 |
|
|
204,776 |
|
|
2,320,822 |
|
|
|
1,485,595 |
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
2022 |
|
331,137 |
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
610,096 |
|
|
423,696 |
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
125,915 |
|
|
1,871,448 |
|
|
|
1,440,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Diane Leopold |
2024 |
|
958,604 |
|
|
|
|
2,285,158 |
|
|
1,059,623 |
|
|
610,562 |
|
|
93,324 |
|
|
5,007,271 |
|
|
|
3,378,387 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, |
2023 |
|
928,066 |
|
|
|
|
800,038 |
|
|
1,318,394 |
|
|
1,184,938 |
|
|
101,700 |
|
|
4,333,136 |
|
|
|
4,833,231 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer and |
2022 |
|
897,388 |
|
|
|
|
800,070 |
|
|
1,235,731 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
90,276 |
|
|
3,023,464 |
|
|
|
4,054,066 |
|
|
President – Contracted Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Carlos M. Brown |
2024 |
|
747,500 |
|
|
|
|
1,713,871 |
|
|
779,625 |
|
|
240,514 |
|
|
54,191 |
|
|
3,535,701 |
|
|
|
2,117,090 |
|
|
President – Dominion Energy |
2023 |
|
641,748 |
|
|
|
|
400,049 |
|
|
436,800 |
|
|
367,930 |
|
|
39,987 |
|
|
1,886,514 |
|
|
|
1,744,832 |
|
|
Services and Executive Vice |
2022 |
|
591,392 |
|
|
|
|
300,016 |
|
|
424,042 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
51,862 |
|
|
1,367,312 |
|
|
|
1,455,017 |
|
|
President, Chief Legal Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Edward H. Baine |
2024 |
|
576,170 |
|
|
|
|
1,028,311 |
|
|
476,876 |
|
|
344,914 |
|
|
37,143 |
|
|
2,463,414 |
|
|
|
1,599,183 |
|
|
President – Dominion Energy Virginia |
2023 |
|
528,852 |
|
|
|
|
260,011 |
|
|
485,403 |
|
|
600,260 |
|
|
38,583 |
|
|
1,913,109 |
|
|
|
1,810,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 65
Name |
|
Executive
|
|
Life
|
|
401(k) Plan
|
|
Company
|
|
Total All
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Robert M. Blue |
|
$ |
53,180 |
|
|
|
$ |
77,294 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,969 |
|
|
|
$ |
26,400 |
|
|
|
$ |
166,843 |
|
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
|
18,258 |
|
|
|
|
34,500 |
|
|
|
|
40,250 |
|
|
|
|
102,508 |
|
|
Diane Leopold |
|
|
11,230 |
|
|
|
|
47,993 |
|
|
|
|
9,434 |
|
|
|
|
24,667 |
|
|
|
|
93,324 |
|
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
|
8,085 |
|
|
|
|
24,088 |
|
|
|
|
9,943 |
|
|
|
|
12,075 |
|
|
|
|
54,191 |
|
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
|
7,846 |
|
|
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
|
|
9,247 |
|
|
|
|
37,143 |
|
|
(7) This column was added to supplement the disclosure required by the SEC to reflect compensation actually realized by each NEO in 2024, without regard to the company’s transition from cash-denominated LTIP performance awards to PSUs. As noted under New Performance Share Units , this change in the LTIP structure was undertaken to further align payouts with shareholders and is in accordance with prevailing industry practices. As further described under New Performance Share Units, during this transition year, the SEC Total column is required to include both the payout of the 2022 cash-denominated performance grant (in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan column) and the grant date target value of the new 2024 PSU grant (in the Stock Awards column), even though the officer received only one LTIP performance grant for each annual cycle.
For Mr. Blue, for example, this means that the SEC Total column appears to show a significant increase in compensation, even though his 2024 compensation targets were unchanged, and his realized compensation for 2024 was lower than the SEC Total column.
The Realized Pay column represents: (1) total compensation, as determined under applicable SEC rules and disclosed under the SEC Total column, minus (2) the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards (as reflected in the Stock Awards column), plus (3) the value realized during the year from the vesting of restricted stock and any applicable performance shares before payment of any applicable withholding taxes.
This column is not a substitute for the amounts reported under the SEC Total column.
66 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information about stock awards and non-equity incentive awards granted to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
All Other
|
Grant
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant
|
|
Approval
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
|
or Units
|
Award
(1)(4)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Blue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 Annual Incentive Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$796,250 |
|
|
$1,592,500 |
|
|
$3,185,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 PSUs (3)(6) |
|
4/1/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,479 |
|
|
124,786 |
|
|
249,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
$6,625,238 |
|
2024 Performance Shares (5)(7) |
|
2/26/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
53,480 |
|
|
66,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,901,749 |
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 Annual Incentive Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,375 |
|
|
672,750 |
|
|
1,345,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 Performance Shares (5) |
|
4/1/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
22,552 |
|
|
45,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,263,868 |
|
2024 Restricted Stock Grant (4) |
|
2/26/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,665 |
|
|
450,002 |
|
Diane Leopold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 Annual Incentive Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,647 |
|
|
867,294 |
|
|
1,734,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 PSUs (3) |
|
4/1/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
30,069 |
|
|
60,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,685,139 |
|
2024 Restricted Stock Grant (4) |
|
2/26/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,887 |
|
|
600,019 |
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 Annual Incentive Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,375 |
|
|
672,750 |
|
|
1,345,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 Performance Shares (5) |
|
4/1/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
22,552 |
|
|
45,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,263,868 |
|
2024 Restricted Stock Grant (4) |
|
2/26/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,665 |
|
|
450,002 |
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 Annual Incentive Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,762 |
|
|
409,524 |
|
|
819,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 PSUs (3) |
|
4/1/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
13,531 |
|
|
27,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
758,310 |
|
2024 Restricted Stock Grant (4) |
|
2/26/2024 |
|
|
|
1/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,799 |
|
|
270,001 |
|
The PSUs are forfeited in their entirety if an officer voluntarily terminates employment or is terminated with cause before the vesting date. The PSUs have prorated vesting for retirement, termination without cause, death or disability. In the case of retirement, prorated vesting will not occur if the CEO (or, for the CEO, the CTD Committee) determines the officer’s retirement is detrimental to the company. Payout for an officer who retires or whose employment is terminated without cause is made following the end of the performance period so that the officer is rewarded only to the extent the performance goals are achieved. In the case of death or disability, payout is made as soon as possible to facilitate the administration of the officer’s estate or financial planning. The payout amount will be the greater of the officer’s target award or an amount based on the predicted performance used for compensation cost disclosure purposes in Dominion Energy’s financial statements.
In the event of a change in control and if within two years an officer’s employment is terminated, or constructively terminated by the successor entity following the change in control date but before the scheduled vesting date, the PSUs are vested in their entirety and payout of the PSUs will occur as soon as administratively feasible following the termination of employment at an amount that is the greater of an officer’s target award or an amount based on the predicted performance used for compensation cost disclosure purposes in Dominion Energy’s financial statements.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 67
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table summarizes equity awards made to NEOs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2024. There were no unexercised or unexercisable option awards outstanding for any of our NEOs as of December 31, 2024.
|
|
Stock Awards |
||||||||||||||
Name |
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Blue |
|
|
42,472 |
(2) |
|
|
$2,287,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
55,761 |
(8) |
|
|
$3,003,287 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
53,480 |
(10) |
|
|
2,880,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,786 |
(11) |
|
|
6,720,974 |
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
|
1,331 |
(2) |
|
|
71,688 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
(5) |
|
|
107,505 |
|
|
|
|
9,070 |
(3) |
|
|
488,510 |
|
|
|
13,605 |
(7) |
|
|
732,765 |
|
|
|
|
1,933 |
(6) |
|
|
104,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,665 |
(4) |
|
|
520,557 |
|
|
|
22,552 |
(9) |
|
|
1,214,651 |
|
Diane Leopold |
|
|
10,235 |
(2) |
|
|
551,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,437 |
(3) |
|
|
723,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,887 |
(4) |
|
|
694,094 |
|
|
|
30,069 |
(11) |
|
|
1,762,645 |
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
|
3,838 |
(2) |
|
|
206,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,719 |
(3) |
|
|
361,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,665 |
(4) |
|
|
520,557 |
|
|
|
22,552 |
(9) |
|
|
1,214,651 |
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
|
2,559 |
(2) |
|
|
137,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,367 |
(3) |
|
|
235,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,799 |
(4) |
|
|
312,334 |
|
|
|
13,531 |
(11) |
|
|
728,780 |
|
68 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table provides information about the value realized by NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2024, on vested restricted stock and performance-based stock awards. There are no outstanding stock options and there were no option exercises by NEOs in 2024.
|
|
Stock Awards |
||||||
Name |
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Value Realized
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Blue |
|
|
45,691 |
|
|
|
$2,132,856 |
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
216,895 |
|
Diane Leopold |
|
|
14,059 |
|
|
|
656,274 |
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
|
5,837 |
(1) |
|
|
270,658 |
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
|
3,515 |
|
|
|
164,080 |
|
Pension Benefits
The following table shows the actuarial present value of accumulated benefits payable to our NEOs, together with the number of years of benefit service credited to each NEO, under the plans listed in the table. Values are computed as of December 31, 2024, using the same interest rate and mortality assumptions used in determining the aggregate pension obligations disclosed in the company’s financial statements. The years of credited service and the present value of accumulated benefits were determined by our plan actuaries, using the appropriate accrued service, pay and other assumptions similar to those used for accounting and disclosure purposes. Please refer to Actuarial Assumptions Used to Calculate Pension Benefits for detailed information regarding these assumptions.
Name |
|
Plan Name |
|
Number of Years
|
|
Present Value of
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Blue |
|
Pension Plan – Traditional Pension Formula |
|
19.50 |
|
|
$1,256,486 |
|
|
|
Benefit Restoration Plan |
|
19.50 |
|
|
4,643,515 |
|
|
|
Frozen Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan |
|
14.25 |
|
|
3,822,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven D. Ridge (3) |
|
Pension Plan – Cash Balance Formula |
|
8.16 |
|
|
69,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diane Leopold |
|
Pension Plan – Traditional Pension Formula |
|
29.16 |
|
|
2,041,224 |
|
|
|
Benefit Restoration Plan |
|
29.16 |
|
|
4,753,164 |
|
|
|
Frozen Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan |
|
23.91 |
|
|
3,794,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlos. M. Brown |
|
Pension Plan – Traditional Pension Formula |
|
17.16 |
|
|
804,359 |
|
|
|
Benefit Restoration Plan |
|
17.16 |
|
|
936,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
Pension Plan – Traditional Pension Formula |
|
29.00 |
|
|
1,397,286 |
|
|
|
Benefit Restoration Plan |
|
29.00 |
|
|
1,129,116 |
|
|
|
Frozen Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan |
|
23.75 |
|
|
862,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 69
Dominion Energy Pension Plan
The Pension Plan is a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. Messrs. Blue, Brown, and Baine and Ms. Leopold were hired before 2008 and therefore participate in the “final average earnings” formula of the Pension Plan (Traditional Pension Formula). Mr. Ridge was hired after January 1, 2008 and therefore participated in the “cash balance” formula of the Pension Plan (Cash Balance Formula), which applies to non-union employees hired on or after January 1, 2008. Mr. Ridge participated in the Cash Balance Formula until May 1, 2022 when his election to cease participation in that plan and participate solely in the 401(k) plan took effect. Participation in the Pension Plan is closed to non-union employees hired or re-hired on or after July 1, 2021.
Traditional Pension Formula
The Traditional Pension Formula provides unreduced retirement benefits at termination of employment at or after age 65 or, with three years of service, at age 60. A participant who has attained age 55 with three years of service may elect early retirement benefits at a reduced amount. If a participant retires between ages 55 and 60, the benefit is reduced 0.25% per month for each month after age 58 and before age 60, and reduced 0.50% per month for each month between ages 55 and 58. All of the NEOs have more than three years of service.
The Traditional Pension Formula benefit is calculated using a formula based on (i) age at retirement; (ii) final average earnings; (iii) estimated Social Security benefits; and (iv) credited service. Final average earnings are the average of the participant’s 60 highest consecutive months of base pay during the last 120 months worked. Final average earnings do not include compensation payable under the AIP, the value of equity awards, gains from the exercise of stock options, long-term cash incentive awards, perquisites or any other form of compensation other than base pay.
Credited service is measured in months, up to a maximum of 30 years of credited service. The estimated Social Security benefit taken into account is the assumed Social Security benefit payable starting at age 65 or actual retirement date, if later, assuming the participant has no further employment after leaving Dominion Energy. These factors are then applied in a formula.
The formula has different percentages for credited service through December 31, 2000, and on and after January 1, 2001. The benefit is the sum of the amounts from the following two formulas.
For Credited Service Through December 31, 2000
|
2.03% |
|
Final Average Earnings |
|
Credited Services before 2001 |
|
|
|
2.00% |
|
Estimated Social Security Benefit |
|
Credited Service before 2001 |
|
For Credited Service On and After January 1, 2001
|
1.80% |
|
Final Average Earnings |
|
Credited Services after 2000 |
|
|
|
1.50% |
|
Estimated Social Security Benefit |
|
Credited Service after 2000 |
|
Credited service is limited to a total of 30 years for all parts of the formula and credited service after 2000 is limited to 30 years minus credited service before 2001.
Benefit payment options are (i) a single life annuity or (ii) a choice of a 50%, 75% or 100% joint and survivor annuity. A Social Security leveling option is available with any of the benefit forms. The normal form of benefit is a single life annuity for unmarried participants and a 50% joint and survivor annuity for married participants. All the payment options are actuarially equivalent in value to the single life annuity. The Social Security leveling option pays a larger benefit equal to the estimated Social Security benefit until the participant is age 62 and then reduced payments after age 62.
Participants in the Traditional Pension Formula also receive a special retirement account, which is in addition to the basic pension benefit. The special retirement account is credited with 2% of base pay each month as well as interest based on the 30-year Treasury bond rate set annually (4.47% in 2024). The special retirement account can be paid in a lump sum or paid in the form of an annuity benefit.
70 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
A participant becomes vested in their benefit after completing three years of service. A vested participant who terminates employment before age 55 can start receiving benefit payments calculated using terminated vested reduction factors at any time after attaining age 55. If payments begin before age 65, then the following reduction factors for the portion of the benefits earned after 2000 apply: age 64 – 9%; age 63 – 16%; age 62 – 23%; age 61 – 30%; age 60 – 35%; age 59 – 40%; age 58 – 44%; age 57 – 48%; age 56 – 52%; and age 55 – 55%.
Cash Balance Formula
The Cash Balance Formula is based solely on amounts credited to a cash balance account on behalf of the participant. The cash balance account is credited with a percentage of pay each month, depending on years of credited service:
5 years |
15 years |
25 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4% of pay |
5% of pay |
6% of pay |
7% of pay |
Cash balance accounts are also credited with interest at an annual rate established in accordance with IRS guidelines. Participants in the Cash Balance Formula can receive immediate distribution of benefits following termination of employment at any age, with three years of service. Benefits will be payable as either an immediate lump sum, an immediate annuity or a deferred annuity.
The Code limits the amount of compensation that may be included in determining pension benefits under qualified pension plans. For 2024, the compensation limit was $345,000. The Code also limits the total annual benefit that may be provided to a participant under a qualified defined benefit plan. For 2024, this limitation was the lesser of (i) $275,000 or (ii) the average of the participant’s compensation during the three consecutive years in which the participant had the highest aggregate compensation.
Dominion Energy Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan
The BRP is a nonqualified defined benefit pension plan designed to make up for benefit reductions under the Pension Plan due to the limits imposed by the Code.
A Dominion Energy employee is eligible to participate in the BRP if (i) they are a member of management or a highly compensated employee, (ii) their Pension Plan benefit is or has been limited by the Code compensation or benefit limits and (iii) they have been designated as a participant by the CTD Committee. A participant remains a participant until they cease to be eligible for any reason other than retirement or until their status as a participant is revoked by the CTD Committee.
BRP Benefit with Traditional Pension Formula
For participants in the Traditional Pension Formula, upon retirement, the BRP benefit is calculated using the same formula (except that the IRS salary limit is not applied) used to determine the participant’s default annuity form of benefit under the Pension Plan (single life annuity for unmarried participants and 50% joint and survivor annuity for married participants), and then subtracting the benefit the participant is entitled to receive under the Pension Plan. To accommodate the enactment of Section 409A of the Code, the portion of a participant’s BRP benefit that had accrued as of December 31, 2004, had previously been frozen, but the calculation of the overall restoration benefit did not change. The pre-2005 portion of the BRP was terminated and paid out to participants in January 2020.
BRP benefits are paid in a lump sum. The lump sum calculation includes an amount approximately equivalent to the amount of taxes the participant will owe on the lump sum payment so that the participant will have sufficient funds, on an after-tax basis, to purchase an annuity contract.
A participant who terminates employment before they are eligible for benefits under the Pension Plan generally is not entitled to a restoration benefit. If a vested participant dies when they are retirement eligible (on or after age 55), the participant’s beneficiary will receive the restoration benefit in a single lump sum payment. If a participant dies while employed but before they have attained age 55 and the participant is married at the time of death, the participant’s spouse will receive a restoration benefit calculated in the same way (except that the IRS salary limit is not applied) as the 50% qualified pre-retirement survivor annuity payable under the Pension Plan and paid in a lump sum payment.
BRP Benefit with Cash Balance Formula
Participants in the Cash Balance Formula of the Pension Plan are also eligible to receive a BRP benefit. The benefit is calculated by determining what the cash balance benefit would have been but for the application of the Code limits and then subtracting the amount of the actual cash balance benefit, paid as a lump sum.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 71
Dominion Energy Frozen Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan
The Frozen ESRP is a nonqualified defined benefit plan that provides for an annual retirement benefit equal to 25% of a participant’s final cash compensation (base salary plus target annual incentive award, determined as of the earlier of a participant’s retirement or October 1, 2019) payable for a period of 10 years. To accommodate the enactment of Section 409A of the Code, the portion of a participant’s Frozen ESRP benefit that had accrued as of December 31, 2004, had previously been frozen, but the calculation of the overall benefit did not change. The pre-2005 portion of the Frozen ESRP was terminated and paid out to participants in January 2020. Effective July 1, 2013, the Frozen ESRP was closed to any new participants. Effective October 1, 2019, future benefit accruals under the Frozen ESRP were frozen as well. Frozen ESRP benefits will continue to be credited with annual cost-of-living increases (equal to one-half of the first 5 percentage point increase in the average Consumer Price Index for the first quarter of the previous year) on each July 1, starting with July 1, 2020 through the July 1 on or immediately preceding the date of a participant’s retirement.
Before the plan was closed, a Dominion Energy employee became eligible to participate in the Frozen ESRP if (i) they were a member of management or a highly compensated employee and (ii) they had been designated as a participant by the CTD Committee. A participant remains a participant until they cease to be eligible for any reason other than retirement or until their status as a participant is revoked by the CTD Committee.
A participant is entitled to the full Frozen ESRP benefit if they separate from service with Dominion Energy after reaching age 55 and achieving 60 months of service. A participant who separates from service with Dominion Energy with at least 60 months of service but who has not yet reached age 55 is entitled to a reduced, prorated retirement benefit. A participant who separates from service with Dominion Energy with fewer than 60 months of service is generally not entitled to a Frozen ESRP benefit unless the participant separated from service on account of disability or death. Participants younger than age 55 on October 1, 2019 may continue to grow into an unreduced benefit based on their future increases in age prior to retirement. No participant had fewer than 60 months of service in the Frozen ESRP as of the October 1, 2019 freeze date.
Frozen ESRP benefits are paid in the form of a single lump sum cash payment. The lump sum calculation includes an amount approximately equivalent to the amount of taxes the participant will owe on the lump sum payment so that the participant will have sufficient funds, on an after-tax basis, to purchase a 10-year annuity contract. The lump sum benefit is fixed as of October 1, 2019 and will not be further adjusted after that date except to reflect increases in a participant’s frozen accrued benefit due to the participant’s additional age or cost of living adjustments described above after October 1, 2019, using the same actuarial factors used to calculate the lump sum benefit on October 1, 2019. Mr. Blue and Ms. Leopold are currently entitled to a full Frozen ESRP retirement benefit. Mr. Baine is entitled to a reduced Frozen ESRP retirement benefit. Messrs. Ridge and Brown became officers after July 1, 2013 and are therefore not eligible to participate in the Frozen ESRP.
Actuarial Assumptions Used to Calculate Pension Benefits
Actuarial assumptions used to calculate Pension Plan benefits are prescribed by the terms of the Pension Plan based on the Code and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) requirements. The present value of the accumulated benefit is calculated using actuarial and other factors as determined by the plan actuaries and approved by Dominion Energy. Actuarial assumptions used for the December 31, 2024 benefit calculations shown in the Pension Benefits table include a discount rate of 5.87% to determine the present value of the future benefit obligations for the Pension Plan and BRP and a lump sum interest rate of 5.12% to estimate the lump sum values of BRP benefits. Each NEO is assumed to retire at the earliest age at which they are projected to become eligible for full, unreduced pension benefits. For purposes of estimating future eligibility for unreduced Pension Plan and Frozen ESRP benefits, the effect of future service is considered. Each NEO is assumed to commence Pension Plan payments at the same age as BRP payments. The longevity assumption used to determine the present value of benefits is the same assumption used for financial reporting of the Pension Plan liabilities, with no assumed mortality before retirement age. Mortality rates are developed from actual and projected plan experience for postretirement benefit plans. Dominion Energy’s actuaries conduct an experience study periodically as part of the process to select a best estimate of mortality. Dominion Energy considers both standard mortality tables and improvement factors as well as the plans’ actual experience when selecting a best estimate. For BRP and Frozen ESRP benefits, other actuarial assumptions include an assumed tax rate of 45% for lump sums. Cash Balance Formula Pension Plan, BRP and Frozen ESRP benefits are assumed to be paid as lump sums; Traditional Pension Formula Pension Plan benefits are assumed to be paid as annuities.
The discount rate for calculating lump sum BRP payments at the time an officer terminates employment is selected by Dominion Energy’s Administrative Benefits Committee and adjusted periodically. For 2024, a 3.05% discount rate was used to determine the lump sum payout amounts. This discount rate was selected based on a rolling average of the blended rate published by the PBGC in October of the previous five years. The discount rate for calculating lump sum Frozen ESRP payments was fixed on October 1, 2019 at 2.56%.
72 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Name |
|
Executive
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Robert M. Blue |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
20,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
41,017 |
|
|
Diane Leopold |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
24,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
40,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
246,920 |
|
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
|
|
32,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
27,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
243,249 |
|
|
The DCP, effective July 1, 2021, is an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan that allows eligible participants to voluntarily defer receipt of up to 50% of their salary over IRS limits, 100% of their annual cash bonuses, 100% of cash- and stock-based long-term incentive awards and, effective May 10, 2023, 100% of their retention awards.
The DCP provides for company matching contributions on a participant’s excess compensation deferrals and (for participants hired after July 1, 2021, or hired before July 1, 2021 who have elected to participate solely in the 401(k) plan) company nonelective contributions above the IRS limits that apply to such contributions under the company’s qualified 401(k) plans, each in accordance with the same matching or nonelective contribution formula applicable to the participant under the company’s qualified 401(k) plans (as described in footnote 6(b) to the Summary Compensation Table ) and subject to the same vesting schedule as applicable to the participant under the company’s qualified 401(k) plans as well. Participants may elect to have excess matching contributions paid to them currently in lieu of being credited to the DCP.
Amounts credited to a participant’s account are notionally invested in one or more investment funds chosen by the participant which are the same funds offered under the company’s 401(k) plans, including a company stock fund. Notional investments may be changed by the executive daily. During the last fiscal year, the notional investments in the DCP had the following annual rates of return:
International Equity Fund |
5.24% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2030 Trust Plus |
|
10.67% |
|
International Equity Index |
5.54% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2035 Trust Plus |
|
11.76% |
|
S&P 500 Index Fund |
25.00% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2040 Trust Plus |
|
12.84% |
|
Small Cap Equity |
14.04% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2045 Trust Plus |
|
13.86% |
|
Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Fund |
16.82% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2050 Trust Plus |
|
14.68% |
|
Wellington CIF II Core Bond Plus Fund S4 |
(0.83)% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2055 Trust Plus |
|
14.67% |
|
Target Retirement Income Trust Plus |
6.64% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2060 Trust Plus |
|
14.66% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2020 Trust Plus |
7.81% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2065 Trust Plus |
|
14.65% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2025 Trust Plus |
9.50% |
|
Target Retirement Income 2070 Trust Plus |
|
14.61% |
|
Distributions under the DCP are generally paid in a lump sum or up to ten annual installments, as elected by the participant, upon the participant’s separation from service from the company. Participants may also elect in-service distributions to occur on a fixed date. All distributions are paid in cash, except for amounts attributable to deferrals of restricted stock or performance-based stock awards, which are distributed in shares of the company’s common stock under the company’s 2024 Incentive Compensation Plan.
Eligibility for the DCP is determined by the CTD Committee and is currently limited to executive officers of the company and any other employee with annual salary in excess of IRS annual limits ($345,000 for 2024). The DCP is administered by Dominion Energy Services, Inc.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 73
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Under certain circumstances, the company provides benefits to eligible employees upon termination of employment, including a termination of employment involving a change in control of the company, that are in addition to termination benefits for other employees in the same situation.
Change in Control
As discussed in the Employee and Executive Benefits section of the CD&A , Dominion Energy has entered into an Employment Continuity Agreement with each of its officers, including the NEOs. Each agreement has a three-year term and is automatically extended annually for an additional year, unless canceled by Dominion Energy.
The Employment Continuity Agreements require two triggers for the payment of most benefits:
For purposes of the Employment Continuity Agreements, a change in control will occur if (i) any person or group becomes a beneficial owner of 20% or more of the combined voting power of Dominion Energy voting stock or (ii) as a direct or indirect result of, or in connection with, a cash tender or exchange offer, merger or other business combination, sale of assets, or contested election, the directors constituting the Dominion Energy Board before any such transaction cease to represent a majority of Dominion Energy’s or its successor’s Board within two years after the last of such transactions.
If an executive officer’s employment following a change in control is terminated without cause or due to a constructive termination, the executive officer will become entitled to the following termination benefits:
In January 2013, the CTD Committee approved the elimination of the excise tax gross-up provision included in the Employment Continuity Agreement for any new officer first elected after February 1, 2013. Since Messrs. Ridge and Brown became officers after this date, they are not eligible for the gross-up provision.
The terms of awards made under the LTIP, rather than the terms of Employment Continuity Agreements, will determine the vesting of each award in the event of a change in control. These provisions are described in the Long-Term Incentive Program section of the CD&A and footnotes to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.
74 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Incremental Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The following table provides the incremental payments that would be earned by each NEO if their employment had been terminated, or constructively terminated, as of December 31, 2024. These benefits are in addition to retirement benefits that would be payable on any termination of employment. Please refer to the Pension Benefits table for information related to the present value of accumulated retirement benefits payable to the NEOs.
Name |
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Retiree
|
|
|
Out-
|
|
|
Excise
|
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Robert M. Blue (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Retirement |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,223,987 |
|
|
$ |
13,243,670 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
15,467,657 |
|
Death / Disability |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,223,987 |
|
|
|
13,243,670 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15,467,657 |
|
Change in Control (4) |
|
|
3,029,032 |
|
|
|
63,554 |
|
|
|
9,321,023 |
|
|
|
8,936,571 |
|
|
|
496,951 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
10,238,067 |
|
|
|
32,110,198 |
|
Steven D. Ridge (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Termination without Cause |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
613,088 |
|
|
|
970,719 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,583,807 |
|
Termination with Cause/
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Death / Disability |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
613,088 |
|
|
|
970,719 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,583,807 |
|
Change in Control (4) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
571,776 |
|
|
|
1,084,200 |
|
|
|
4,260,750 |
|
|
|
91,290 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,033,016 |
|
Diane Leopold (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Retirement |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,210,288 |
|
|
|
2,497,548 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,707,836 |
|
Death / Disability |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,210,288 |
|
|
|
2,497,548 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,707,836 |
|
Change in Control (4) |
|
|
1,385,792 |
|
|
|
758,779 |
|
|
|
1,521,968 |
|
|
|
5,711,289 |
|
|
|
337,748 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,740,576 |
|
Carlos M. Brown (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Termination without Cause |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
591,167 |
|
|
|
1,225,992 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,817,159 |
|
Termination with Cause/
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Death / Disability |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
591,167 |
|
|
|
1,225,992 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,817,159 |
|
Change in Control (4) |
|
|
2,816,573 |
|
|
|
497,989 |
|
|
|
1,038,658 |
|
|
|
4,260,750 |
|
|
|
120,440 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8,759,410 |
|
Edward H. Baine (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Termination without Cause |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
379,605 |
|
|
|
785,298 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,164,903 |
|
Termination with Cause/
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Death / Disability |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
379,605 |
|
|
|
785,298 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,164,903 |
|
Change in Control (4) |
|
|
2,743,669 |
|
|
|
305,762 |
|
|
|
633,480 |
|
|
|
3,005,094 |
|
|
|
39,230 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
3,258,958 |
|
|
|
10,011,193 |
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 75
E quity Compensation Plans
As of December 31, 2024 |
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Number of securities
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Plans approved by shareholders |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
26,725,031 |
|
|
Plans not approved by shareholders |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
26,725,031 |
|
|
C EO Pay Ratio
This section presents required disclosure, in accordance with SEC rules, of (i) the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, other than our CEO, (ii) the annual total compensation of our CEO and (iii) the ratio of (ii) to (i), which is referred to as the “CEO pay ratio.”
Mr. Blue had 2024 annual total compensation of $12,904,625 as reflected in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table . Our median employee’s annual total compensation for 2024 was $124,178. As a result, we estimate that the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual compensation of our median employees was 104:1.
We identified our median employee for 2024 from our employee population as of December 31, 2024. On that date we had approximately 14,800 employees, all of whom were employed in the United States. To determine our median employee, we chose base pay as our consistently applied compensation measure. We then conducted our analysis using a clustered sampling methodology, which divides the population into clusters or groups, to identify employees within a 1% range of the median. To accomplish this, we used payroll data to determine the base pay actually paid to each employee in our sample during a measurement period from January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024. Using this methodology, we identified the median employee from the sampled group and calculated annual total compensation for that employee for 2024 using the same methodology we used for our NEOs as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 65 .
This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. Therefore, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
76 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
P ay versus Performance
In this section, we provide information about the relationship between the compensation paid to our NEOs and the financial performance of the company, as required by SEC rules. The following table shows the past five fiscal years’ total compensation for our CEO and other NEOs (expressed as an average) as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table , the total compensation actually paid (CAP) to our CEO and other NEOs (expressed as an average), our TSR, our peer group’s TSR over the same period, our net income and our operating EPS.
Pay vs. Performance Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
Average |
Value of Initial Fixed $100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Year |
Summary
|
Compensation
|
Summary
|
Compensation
|
Compensation
|
Compensation
|
Total
|
Peer Group
|
Net
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Executives |
|
Summary
|
|
Deduct
|
|
Deduct Stock
|
|
Add Pension
|
|
Add Equity
|
|
CAP ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
2024 |
|
CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other NEOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Executives |
|
Pension Service
|
|
Prior Service Cost
|
|
Pension Valuation
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2024 |
|
CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other NEOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Awards |
|
Vested Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Year |
|
Executives |
|
Year End Fair
|
|
Year over Year
|
|
Fair Value as
|
|
Change as of
|
|
Deduct
|
|
Value of
|
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
2024 |
|
CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other NEOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 77
Relationship between Performance Measures and Compensation Actually Paid
The following charts provide a graphic representation of the relationship between executive compensation actually paid to the company’s CEO and other NEOs (expressed as an average) and the performance measures included in the Pay vs. Performance Table (TSR, Peer Group TSR, Net Income and Operating EPS).
CAP vs. TSR
CAP vs. Net Income
CAP vs. Operating Earnings Per Share
Most Important Performance Measures Table
The three items listed below represent the most important performance measures we used to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs for 2024 to company performance, as further described in the Annual Incentive Plan and the Long-Term Incentive Program sections of our CD&A .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
|
ITEM 3 |
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor
As noted in its charter, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent audit firm retained to audit the company’s financial statements, including the compensation of the firm and related fee negotiations. The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte as the com pany’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. Deloitte has served as Dominion Energy’s independent auditor continuously since 1988. In order to ensure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the independent audit firm. Further, in conjunction with the mandated rotation of the audit firm’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its chair will continue to be directly involved in the selection of Deloitte’s new lead engagement partner. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Deloitte to serve as the company’s independent auditor is in the best interests of Dominion Energy and its shareholders. The Board has determined that it would be desirable to request an expression of opinion from the shareholders on the appointment of Deloitte. If the shareholders do not ratify the selection of Deloitte, the selection of the independent auditor will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee. However, even if the selection of Deloitte is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may appoint a different independent auditor at any time during the year if it is determined that such a change would be in the best interests of Dominion Energy and its shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this item. |
|
|
|
|
|
A udit Committee Matters
A uditor Fees and Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee has a pre-approval policy for Deloitte’s services and fees. Each year, the Audit Committee pre-approves a schedule that details the services to be provided for the following year and an estimated charge for such services. The Audit Committee approved the schedule of services and fees for 2024. In accordance with Dominion Energy’s pre-approval policy, any changes to the schedule may be approved by the Audit Committee at its next meeting.
The following table presents fees paid to Deloitte for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, all of which were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
Type of Fees
|
|
2024 |
|
|
2023 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Audit Fees (1) |
$ |
|
8.26 |
|
$ |
|
8.26 |
|
Audit-Related Fees (2) |
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
Tax Fees (3) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
All Other Fees (4) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
Total |
$ |
|
10.26 |
|
$ |
|
9.17 |
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 79
Independent Auditors for 2025
The Audit Committee discussed with management and reviewed with our independent auditor its plans and proposed fees for auditing the 2025 consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of Dominion Energy and its subsidiaries, as well as its proposed audit-related services and fees. Based on these discussions and review of the proposed fee schedule, the Audit Committee retained Deloitte as Dominion Energy’s independent auditor for 2025 and in accordance with the pre-approval policy, approved the fees for the services presented to the Audit Committee.
Representatives of Deloitte will be present at the 2025 Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire and will be available to respond to appropriate shareholder questions.
A udit Committee Report
Our Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of Dominion Energy’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices.
Management is responsible for Dominion Energy’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. The company’s independent auditor, Deloitte, is responsible for performing an independent audit of those financial statements and the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting and expressing an opinion on the conformity of the company’s financial statements to GAAP and an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Throughout 2024, our Committee met with the internal auditors and Deloitte, with and without management present, to discuss the plans for, and scope and results of, their audits and reviews of Dominion Energy’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of Dominion Energy’s financial reporting. At three of our Committee’s meetings, we also met with the company’s internal auditor, Deloitte and management in separate executive sessions.
Management has represented that Dominion Energy’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP. We reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements and management’s report on the company’s internal control over financial reporting with management and Deloitte. In accordance with the applicable requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and approved by the SEC, this discussion included a review of significant accounting policies, critical accounting policies and practices, critical accounting estimates and the quality of Dominion Energy’s accounting principles.
We have received written disclosures and letters from Deloitte required by both the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’s communications with our Committee concerning independence and the NYSE governance standards regarding internal quality-control procedures. We have discussed with Deloitte the issue of Deloitte’s independence from Dominion Energy, including any non-audit services performed by Deloitte. We rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to us and on the representations made by management, the internal auditors and Deloitte.
Relying on these reviews and discussions, we recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements in Dominion Energy’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, for filing with the SEC.
Joseph M. Rigby, Chair
Kristin G. Lovejoy
Pamela J. Royal, M.D.
Vanessa Allen Sutherland
80 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Shareholder Proposal
|
I TEM 4 |
Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Request to Consider Eliminating Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Goals in Executive Pay Incentives
You are being asked to vote on a shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the 2025 Annual Meeting, regarding a request for the Board of Directors’ CTD Committee to revisit its incentive guidelines for executive pay to consider eliminating Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Goals in executive pay incentives. Details of the proposal are included below. The company’s opposing statement explaining why the Board recommends a vote against the proposal can be found beginning on page 82 . |
|
|
|
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST this item.
|
National Legal and Policy Center, 107 Park Washington Court, Falls Church, Virginia 22046, holder of 45.967 shares of Dominion Energy, Inc. common stock, has notified us that it intends to present the following proposal at the annual meeting.
Whereas: A government-driven, media-amplified “scientific consensus” 1 2 narrative claims anthropogenically-caused climate change will result in catastrophic impacts to the planet. Research shows these scenarios are unlikely, and that harmful consequences from carbon dioxide emissions have been exaggerated. 3 For example:
Supporting Statement : Despite evidence that climate alarmism and associated renewable energy policies are unwarranted, Dominion Energy, Inc.’s executive pay program incorporates unnecessary incentives to attain “non-carbon emitting generation capacity” goals (NCGC):” 14
Under the Company’s 2023 60% performance grant in its long-term incentive program, named executive officers received performance grants that included a “10% weighting” for NCGC.
The NCGC performance metric “measures the company’s wind, solar, nuclear and conventional hydro generation capacity as a percentage of its total generation capacity.”
1. https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/11/11/215
2. https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/
3. https://judithcurry.com/2023/03/28/uns-climate-panic-is-more-politics-than-science/
4. https://www.dominionenergy.com/-/media/pdfs/global/reports/lobbying-and-trade-association-report
5. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/faq/faq-chapter-1/
6. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/10/trump-withdrawal-paris-agreement-different-00188002
7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988317301226
8. https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-the-high-emissions-rcp8-5-global-warming-scenario/
9. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00177-3
10. https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/18-spectacularly-wrong-predictions-were-made-around-the-time-of-the-first-earth-day-in-1970-expect-more-this-year/
11. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/04/200430113003.htm
12. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01711-1
13. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/36/18/JCLI-D-22-0708.1.xml
14. https://s2.q4cdn.com/510812146/files/doc_downloads/2024/Dominion-Energy-2024-Proxy-Statement.pdf
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 81
The NCGC performance metric is used “to ensure officers remain focused on the Company’s long-term environmental goals...which are expected to enhance long-term shareholder value.”
Power generation incentives based on specific sources are unscientific and are a breach of fiduciary duty. The Company is a public utility and is morally and legally obligated to deliver the lowest-cost electricity to ratepayers — within the guardrails of local, state and federal laws — and must focus on cost-effective and efficient power generation. Replacing or rejecting longstanding dependable sources 15 to reach quotas for sources such as wind or solar are uneconomical 16 17 and environmentally problematic. 18 19 Customers and investors should not pay the price for incentivizing poor executive decisions.
Resolved : Shareholders request the Board of Directors’ Compensation and Talent Development Committee to revisit its incentive guidelines for executive pay, to re-emphasize fiduciary goals and consider eliminating NCGC-based incentives from compensation inducements.
15. https://www.wsj.com/articles/texas-energy-blackouts-ercot-solar-power-f3476ad9
16. https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/feds-waiving-financial-assurances-offshore-wind-leave-future-costs-taxpayers
17. https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/solar-industry-facing-bankruptcies-leaving-many-with-roof-panels-that-dont-work/
18. https://www.providencejournal.com/story/opinion/columns/2024/10/13/supporters-are-vehement-wind-power-will-save-the-planet-no-matter-what-the-facts-are/75298582007/
19. https://www.thecollegefix.com/stop-clearing-thousands-of-acres-to-build-solar-panels-harvard-study/
Opposing Statement
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST this item.
|
We believe the change suggested by the proponent is not in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
Our executive compensation program is aligned with the company’s strategy and the interests of our stakeholders.
Our executive compensation program is based not only on attracting, developing and retaining talent, but also on motivating and rewarding performance that supports our business and strategic plan, while aligning management’s interests with those of our shareholders, customers, communities and other stakeholders. The use of a NCGC performance metric is a component of this strategy, encouraging officers to focus on the company’s long-term strategic plan, which includes delivering increasingly clean energy while maintaining reliability and affordability for customers.
Our management engages with shareholders on a variety of topics throughout the year and the CTD Committee considers the feedback received from shareholders when designing the executive compensation program. Following meetings and calls where our shareholders expressed a preference for including sustainability goals within our long‑term incentive program, we incorporated the NCGC metric in our long-term incentive program, beginning with the 2022 performance award. Our executive compensation program received 95.1% and 97.1% support from shareholders on the Say on Pay vote at our 2024 and 2023 Annual Meetings, respectively. The executive compensation programs of several industry peers also use similarly focused performance metrics.
Developing diverse non-carbon emitting generation sources supports our “all-of-the-above” strategy for delivering reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy.
The Board of Directors believe that the NCGC performance metric is an appropriate performance metric for our executive compensation program because it supports our “all-of-the-above” approach to meeting our customers’ energy needs by encouraging the development of diverse non-carbon emitting generation sources. This development process directly aligns with our mission to provide reliable, affordable and increasingly clean energy.
The company believes that no single energy source, grid solution or energy efficiency program is expected to reliably serve the growing needs of our customers, and it is therefore necessary to utilize an “all-of-the-above” approach to support the increased energy demand within our service territory. As the company carries out its mission to deliver increasingly clean energy, the company’s changing generation mix has reduced emissions and achieved significant progress toward our decarbonization goals. See Sustainability and Our Path to Net Zero on page 36 and our Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Report available at sustainability.dominionenergy.com.
82 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Our long-term strategy aligns with the clean energy goals of the Virginia Clean Economy Act—an important requirement of Virginia state law focused on the development of clean energy not mentioned by the proponent. Our goal of achieving Net Zero carbon and methane emissions by 2050 also aligns with our obligations under the Virginia Clean Economy Act.
The Board considered this proposal, its fiduciary duties, the design and philosophy of the company’s executive compensation program and the company’s strategy. We believe that eliminating the NCGC performance metric at this time is not in the best interests of the company or its shareholders. For the reasons discussed above, we recommend you vote AGAINST this proposal.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 83
Se
curity Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth, as of March 14, 2025, the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each of our directors and NEOs, and by all directors and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial Ownership as of March 14, 2025 (1)
Name |
|
Shares of
|
|
Deferred
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Total (3) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Bennett |
|
8,965 |
|
|
19,789 |
|
|
— |
|
|
28,753 |
|
Robert M. Blue |
|
161,312 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
161,312 |
|
Paul M. Dabbar |
|
4,797 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,797 |
|
D. Maybank Hagood |
|
3,848 |
|
|
17,475 |
|
|
— |
|
|
21,323 |
|
Mark J. Kington |
|
92,675 |
|
|
122,318 |
|
|
— |
|
|
214,993 |
|
Kristin G. Lovejoy |
|
— |
|
|
14,228 |
|
|
— |
|
|
14,228 |
|
Joseph M. Rigby |
|
8,762 |
|
|
27,352 |
|
|
— |
|
|
36,114 |
|
Pamela F. Royal, M.D. |
|
17,434 |
|
|
36,593 |
|
|
— |
|
|
54,026 |
|
Robert H. Spilman, Jr. |
|
35,441 |
|
|
17,195 |
|
|
— |
|
|
52,636 |
|
Susan N. Story |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Vanessa Allen Sutherland |
|
475 |
|
|
8,572 |
|
|
— |
|
|
9,047 |
|
Edward H. Baine |
|
28,886 |
|
|
— |
|
|
19,611 |
|
|
48,497 |
|
Carlos M. Brown |
|
20,521 |
|
|
3,616 |
|
|
33,475 |
|
|
57,612 |
|
Diane Leopold (4) |
|
67,206 |
|
|
— |
|
|
37,118 |
|
|
104,324 |
|
Steven D. Ridge |
|
7,442 |
|
|
— |
|
|
37,759 |
|
|
45,201 |
|
All directors and current executive officers as a group (17 persons) (4)(5) |
|
469,081 |
|
|
295,064 |
|
|
157,167 |
|
|
921,313 |
|
Significant Shareholders
Name and Address of
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Percentage
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355 (1) |
|
88,354,289 |
|
|
10.37% |
|
BlackRock, Inc., 50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001 (2) |
|
69,476,083 |
|
|
8.15% |
|
State Street Corporation, 1 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02114 (3) |
|
47,918,597 |
|
|
5.62% |
|
84 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Q uestions and Answers About the 2025 Annual Meeting and Voting
How do I attend the 2025 Annual Meeting?
The 2025 Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format only, via the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please vote by proxy as soon as possible. Your vote is very important to us, and we want your shares to be represented at the meeting.
To attend the virtual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice, proxy card or voting instruction form. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 9:30 a.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, May 7, 2025 and online access to the webcast will open approximately 15 minutes prior to the start of the 2025 Annual Meeting. If you experience technical difficulties during the check-in process or during the meeting, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual meeting log-in page at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/D2025.
We are committed to ensuring that shareholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. You will be able to attend the meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/D2025.
Why did I receive these proxy materials?
You received these materials because you owned shares of Dominion Energy common stock as of February 28, 2025, and are therefore eligible to vote at the 2025 Annual Meeting. These materials allow you to exercise your right to vote at the 2025 Annual Meeting and provide you with important information about Dominion Energy and the items to be presented for a vote at this meeting.
What is a proxy?
A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote your shares on your behalf at the 2025 Annual Meeting. The person you designate is called a proxy. When you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card.
The proxy card accompanying this Proxy Statement is solicited by the Board for the 2025 Annual Meeting. By signing and returning it, you will be designating two independent directors of the Board and Dominion Energy’s Corporate Secretary as proxies to vote your shares at the 2025 Annual Meeting based on your direction. You also may designate your proxies and direct your votes over the Internet or by telephone as described below.
Who is entitled to vote?
All shareholders who owned Dominion Energy common stock at the close of business on the record date of February 28, 2025, may vote. Each share of Dominion Energy common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the 2025 Annual Meeting. There were 852,215,186 shares of Dominion Energy common stock outstanding on February 28, 2025.
What are the matters on which I will be casting a vote?
You will be voting on the following:
|
|
|
Board Vote Recommendation |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Election of the 11 director nominees named in this Proxy Statement |
|
FOR each director nominee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Advisory vote on approval of executive compensation (Say on Pay) |
|
FOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending December 31, 2025 |
|
FOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
Shareholder proposal – eliminating non-carbon emitting generation goals in executive pay incentives, if properly presented |
|
AGAINST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 85
Management and the Board are not aware of any matters that may properly be brought before the 2025 Annual Meeting other than the matters disclosed in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters not disclosed in this Proxy Statement are properly presented at the 2025 Annual Meeting for consideration, the person or persons voting the proxies solicited by the Board for the meeting will vote them in accordance with their best judgment.
What are the voting requirements to elect the directors and to approve each of the other items in this Proxy Statement and what is the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes?
|
|
|
Votes Required for
|
|
Effect of
|
|
Effect of Broker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Election of directors |
|
Majority of votes cast for each director |
|
No effect |
|
No effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Advisory vote on approval of executive compensation (Say on Pay) |
|
Majority of votes cast |
|
No effect |
|
No effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
Ratification of appointment of independent auditor |
|
Majority of votes cast |
|
No effect |
|
Discretionary voting by broker permitted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
Shareholder proposal – eliminating non-carbon emitting generation goals in executive pay incentives, if properly presented |
|
Majority of votes cast |
|
No effect |
|
No effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines require that directors be elected by a majority of the votes cast unless the election is contested. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “For” a director exceeds the number of votes cast “Against” the director. In an uncontested election, if an incumbent nominee does not receive a majority of the votes cast “For” his or her election, he or she will continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director” and will be required to submit a letter of resignation promptly to the Board for consideration. In a contested election, where the number of director nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast.
What is discretionary voting by brokers?
If you hold your shares in street name (see How do I vote my shares? – Beneficial Owners below) and you do not provide your broker with timely voting instructions, NYSE rules permit brokerage firms to vote at their discretion on certain “routine” matters. At this meeting, the only routine matter is Item 3, the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent auditor. Brokerage firms may not vote without instructions from you on any of the other matters. Without your voting instructions on these items, a “broker non-vote” will occur.
How do I ask questions during the meeting?
To submit questions in advance of the 2025 Annual Meeting, visit www.proxyvote.com/dominion, enter your 16-digit control number and follow the instructions provided. To submit questions during the 2025 Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/D2025, enter your 16-digit control number and follow the instructions provided. We will endeavor to answer as many shareholder-submitted questions during the meeting as time permits. We reserve the right to edit profanity or other inappropriate language and to exclude questions that are not pertinent to meeting matters, do not comply with the meeting rules of conduct or are otherwise inappropriate. If we receive substantially similar questions, we will group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition.
86 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
How do I vote my shares?
Your voting method depends on whether you are a Shareholder of Record, Beneficial Owner or participant in one of Dominion Energy’s employee 401(k) plans.
Shareholders of Record
If your shares are registered directly in your name on Dominion Energy’s records (including any shares held in Dominion Energy Direct ® , Dominion Energy’s direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan), you are considered, for those shares, to be the “Shareholder of Record.” The proxy materials or Notice have been sent directly to you by Dominion Energy.
You may vote your shares by proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by completing, signing and dating and returning your proxy card by mail in the envelope provided. During the meeting, you may also vote online by following the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/D2025. Even if you plan to attend the virtual meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares ahead of time with the instructions below to ensure your shares will be represented and voted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY INTERNET
www.proxyvote.com/dominion
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/D2025
|
|
BY TELEPHONE Call (800) 690-6903 if you are a registered shareholder or an employee 401(k) plan participant. |
|
BY MAIL You can vote by mail by completing, dating and signing your proxy card and returning it in the postage-paid envelope. |
Beneficial Owners
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other Shareholder of Record such as the trustee of the employee 401(k) plans sponsored by Dominion Energy or its subsidiaries (Plans), you are considered a “Beneficial Owner” of shares held in street name. The proxy materials or Notice, including voting and revocation instructions, have been forwarded to you by the institution that holds your shares. As the Beneficial Owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other Shareholder of Record on how to vote your shares.
How many shares must be present to hold the 2025 Annual Meeting?
In order for us to conduct the 2025 Annual Meeting, a majority of the shares outstanding on the record date of February 28, 2025 must be present virtually or represented by proxy. This is referred to as a quorum. Your shares are counted as present if you attend the 2025 Annual Meeting virtually or if you submit a properly executed proxy by mail, Internet or telephone. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. Please see What is discretionary voting by brokers ? above.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 87
Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation and who will count the votes?
Dominion Energy will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation. Some of our employees may communicate with shareholders after the initial solicitation but will not receive any special compensation for making such communications. We have also retained Georgeson LLC, a proxy solicitation firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $15,000 and reimbursement of expenses. In addition, we may reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses in sending proxy materials to the Beneficial Owners of our common stock. We have retained Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc. (Broadridge) to tabulate the votes and to assist with the 2025 Annual Meeting.
Can I access the Notice of Annual Meeting, 2025 Proxy Statement, 2024 Annual Report and 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K over the Internet?
Yes. These documents may be viewed at investors.dominionenergy.com/proxy or at the website address provided on your proxy card or voting instructions.
Why did I receive a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials instead of printed proxy materials?
Most shareholders received a Notice instead of a full set of printed proxy materials. The Notice provides access to proxy materials in a fast and efficient manner via the Internet. This reduces the amount of paper necessary to produce these materials, as well as the costs associated with mailing these materials to shareholders. On or around March 28, 2025, we began mailing the Notice to certain shareholders of record as of February 28, 2025, and posted our proxy materials on the website referenced in the Notice. As more fully described in the Notice, shareholders may choose to access our proxy materials on the website or may request to receive a printed set of our proxy materials. The Notice and website provide information regarding how you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email for this meeting and on an ongoing basis. Shareholders who previously requested printed proxy materials or electronic materials on an ongoing basis received those materials in the format requested.
How can I receive future proxy materials and annual reports electronically?
You can consent to receive these materials electronically in the future by following the instructions to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicating that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically going forward. You will receive a Notice by mail next year with instructions containing the Internet address to access these documents and how to vote. If you vote by Internet, you will have the opportunity to consent to receive an email message when future proxy materials are available to view online. By agreeing to access your proxy materials online, you will save Dominion Energy the cost of producing and mailing documents to you and help preserve environmental resources. Your choice will remain in effect until you notify Dominion Energy that you wish to resume mail delivery of these documents. You can also request paper copies of these documents by writing us at Dominion Energy, Inc., Shareholder Services, P.O. Box 26532, Richmond, Virginia 23261; by calling us at (800) 552-4034; or by emailing us at shareholderrelations@dominionenergy.com. If you are a Beneficial Owner of shares, please refer to the information provided by the institution that holds your shares for instructions on how to elect similar options.
88 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
What is “householding” and how does it affect me?
Householding refers to practices used to reduce the number of copies of proxy materials sent to one address. For Shareholders of Record who received printed proxy materials, a single copy of the 2025 Proxy Statement, 2024 Annual Report and 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K (annual report package) has been sent to multiple shareholders who reside at the same address, unless we have received instructions from you to the contrary (each shareholder, however, will receive a separate proxy card). Any shareholder who would like to receive a separate annual report package may call or write us at the telephone number and address above, and we will promptly deliver it. If you received multiple copies of the annual report package and would like to receive a single copy of these materials in the future, please contact Shareholder Services using the information shown above. Beneficial Owners of shares should contact the institution that holds their shares regarding combined mailing.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 89
O ther Information
How to Contact Us
Our Directors. Shareholders and other stakeholders can communicate with our directors individually, including our Lead Director, committee chairs and non-management directors, as the full Board, or by Board committee, in each case by sending correspondence by mail, care of the Corporate Secretary, Dominion Energy, Inc., P.O. Box 26532, Richmond, Virginia 23261. Concerns relating to accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters may also be submitted confidentially and anonymously by mail.
The Board has directed the Corporate Secretary or his representative to monitor, review and sort all written communications sent to the directors. Communications related to matters that are within the scope of the responsibilities of the Board are forwarded to the Board, the Board committee or individual directors, as appropriate.
The Corporate Secretary and his representative are authorized to exclude, and thus not forward to the Board, communications that are related to routine business and customer service matters, bulk advertising or otherwise inappropriate communications, including, but not limited to, business and product solicitations, unsolicited publications, résumés and job inquiries, spam, junk mail, mass mailing and material containing profanity, hostility or material of a similar nature. The Board has also directed the Corporate Secretary or his representative to forward correspondence related to routine business and customer service matters to the appropriate management personnel. When appropriate, the Corporate Secretary will consult with the Audit Committee Chair, who will determine whether to communicate further with the Audit Committee and/or the full Board with respect to the correspondence received.
Investor Relations. Shareholders may contact our Investor Relations team at any time at investor.relations@dominionenergy.com.
Shareholder Services (Transfer Agent). Broadridge is the transfer agent, registrar and dividend-paying agent for Dominion Energy’s common stock and is the administrator for Dominion Energy Direct ® , Dominion Energy’s direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan. For transfer agent matters, shareholders may communicate with Dominion Energy through Broadridge by writing to Dominion Energy Shareholder Services, c/o Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, P.O. Box 1342, Brentwood, New York 11717, by calling Dominion Energy Shareholder Services care of Broadridge at (800) 552-4034 or by sending an email to shareholder@broadridge.com. Additional information regarding Dominion Energy Shareholder Services can be found at investors.dominionenergy.com/stock-information/shareholder-services.
Corporate Governance Materials Available on Our Website
On our website, dominionenergy.com/our-company/leadership-and-governance, you can find, among other things:
You may request a paper copy of any of our governance documents at no charge by writing to our Corporate Secretary at Dominion Energy, Inc., P.O. Box 26532, Richmond, Virginia 23261. Information on our website is not, and will not be deemed to be, a part of this Proxy Statement or incorporated into any other filings with the SEC.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
To the company’s knowledge, no executive officer, director or 10% beneficial owner failed to file, on a timely basis, the reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, except a late Form 4 that was filed a day late on December 4, 2024 due to an administrative oversight to report 872 shares used to satisfy tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock for Mr. Ridge.
90 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Business Proposals and Nominations by Shareholder s
Shareholder Business Proposals for Inclusion in the 2026 Proxy Statement (SEC Rule 14a-8)
Under SEC rules, a proposal that a shareholder wishes to include in our proxy statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting must be received by our Corporate Secretary no later than 5 p.m., Eastern Time, on November 28, 2025. Proposals should be sent to our Corporate Secretary at Dominion Energy, Inc., 600 East Canal Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. Shareholders wishing to submit a proposal should refer to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, which sets standards for eligibility and specifies the types of proposals that are not appropriate for inclusion in our proxy statement.
Shareholder Director Nominations for Inclusion in the 2026 Proxy Statement (Proxy Access)
We have adopted a proxy access right to permit, under certain circumstances, a shareholder or a group of shareholders to include in our annual meeting proxy statement director candidates whom they have nominated. These proxy access provisions in our Bylaws provide, among other things, that a shareholder or group of up to 20 shareholders seeking to include director candidates in our annual meeting proxy statement must own, in the aggregate, at least 3% of the company’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least the previous three years. The number of shareholder-nominated candidates appearing in any annual meeting proxy statement cannot exceed the greater of 20% of our Board or two directors. A shareholder who wishes exercise the proxy access right must deliver written notice to our Corporate Secretary no less than 120 days and not more than 150 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the date that the company issued its proxy materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting. Shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) must satisfy the other requirements outlined in Article XII of our Bylaws.
Shareholder Director Nominations and Other Shareholder Business Proposals for Presentation at the 2026 Annual Meeting
Under our Bylaws, any shareholder of record entitled to vote in the election of directors may nominate persons for election as directors or propose other business (in each case, not submitted either under proxy access or SEC Rule 14a-8) at the 2026 Annual Meeting by delivering written notice to our Corporate Secretary no less than 90 days and not more than 120 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting.
The notice regarding a director nominee must contain the information and conform to the requirements specified in Article XI of our Bylaws. The notice regarding a proposal for other shareholder business must contain the information and conform to the requirements specified in Article X of our Bylaws and must be a proper subject for shareholder action under applicable law.
Submission |
Rules and Requirements |
Deadline |
|
|
|
Shareholder proposals for inclusion in next year’s annual meeting proxy materials |
SEC Rule 14a-8 |
No later than 5 p.m., Eastern Time, on November 28, 2025 |
|
|
|
Notice Provision for Other Items of Business |
Article X of Bylaws |
No earlier than January 7, 2026, and no later than 5 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 6, 2026 |
|
|
|
Notice Provision for non-Proxy Access Director Nominees |
Article XI of Bylaws |
No earlier than January 7, 2026, and no later than 5 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 6, 2026 |
|
|
|
Proxy Access Director Nominees |
Article XII of Bylaws |
No earlier than October 29, 2025 and no later than 5 p.m., Eastern Time, on November 28, 2025 |
Where to submit : Corporate Secretary, Dominion Energy, Inc., 600 East Canal Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
We encourage shareholders who wish to submit a proposal or nomination to seek independent counsel. Dominion Energy will not consider any proposal or nomination that is not timely or otherwise does not meet the Bylaw and SEC requirements. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT 91
A ppendix A
Reconciliation of Reported Earnings (GAAP) to Operating Earnings (non-GAAP)
(Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) |
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Reported Earnings (GAAP) (1) |
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,399 |
|
|
|
$ |
(401 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reported earnings (2) : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Pre-tax loss (income) |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
|
3,205 |
|
|
Income tax |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
|
(991 |
) |
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) |
|
$ |
2,392 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,717 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,288 |
|
|
Earnings per common share – diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Reported Earnings (GAAP) (3) |
|
$ |
2.44 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
|
|
$ |
4.12 |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reported earnings (after-tax) (3) |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
(0.38 |
) |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
|
(1.23 |
) |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) (3) |
|
$ |
2.77 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
|
(Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) |
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Pre-Tax loss (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nonregulated asset impairments and other charges |
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
|
$ |
851 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
Regulated asset retirements and other charges |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
Sale of Kewaunee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net (gain) loss on nuclear decommissioning trust funds |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
Mark-to-market impact of economic hedging activities |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
Mark-to-market of pension and OPEB plans |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Business review |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,732 |
) |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
Sale of non-wholly owned nonregulated solar facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Merger litigation and integration charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|||
Other items |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
|
3,205 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Tax effect of above adjustments to reported earnings* |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
Deferred taxes associated with sale of gas distribution operations (4) |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Other income tax adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|||
|
|
$ |
(142 |
) |
|
|
$ |
1,481 |
|
|
|
$ |
(382 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(355 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(516 |
) |
|
* Income taxes for individual pre-tax items include current and deferred taxes using a transactional effective tax rate.
DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT A- 1
Operating earnings is a financial measure that is not required by or presented in accordance with GAAP. This non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP measures, such as reported earnings, and may be calculated differently from, and therefore may not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used at other companies.
Dominion Energy uses operating earnings as the primary performance measurement of its earnings outlook and results for public communications with analysts and investors. Dominion Energy also uses operating earnings internally for budgeting, for reporting to the Board of Directors, for the company’s incentive compensation plans and for its targeted dividend payouts and other purposes. Dominion Energy management believes operating earnings provide a more meaningful representation of the company’s fundamental earnings power.
A- 2 DOMINION ENERGY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Dominion Energy 600 East Canal Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 DominionEnengy.com logo FSC www,fsc.org MIX From responsible sources FSC C006249
SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE DOMINION ENERGY, INC. C/O BROADRIDGE P.O. BOX 1342 BRENTWOOD, NY 11717 Use one of the voting methods below up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 6, 2025, or 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 30, 2025 for shares held in one of the employee 401(k) plans sponsored by Dominion Energy, Inc. or its subsidiaries. ELECTRONIC VOTING INSTRUCTIONS Vote 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you vote by telephone or Internet, please do not send your proxy in by mail. VOTE BY INTERNET Go to www.proxyvote.com/dominion or scan the QR Barcode above. Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of proxy materials. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. V69638-P28021 DOMINION ENERGY, INC. Election of Directors—The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees. 1. Election of Directors. The nominees are: 1A. James A. Bennett ! ! ! The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Items 2 and 3. 1B. Robert M. Blue For Against Abstain ! ! ! 2. Advisory Vote on Approval of Executive Compensation (Say on Pay) 1C. Paul M. Dabbar ! ! 3. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor 1D. D. Maybank Hagood ! For Abstain 1E. Mark J. Kington The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Item 4. ! 4. Shareholder Proposal Regarding Eliminating Non-Carbon Emitting Generation Goals in Executive Pay Incentives 1F. Kristin G. Lovejoy ! ! 1G. Joseph M. Rigby 1H. Pamela J. Royal, M.D. 1I. Robert H. Spilman, Jr. 1J. Susan N. Story ! ! ! 1K. Vanessa Allen Sutherland Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Wednesday, May 7, 2025, 9:30 a.m. ET Attending the Annual Meeting We are pleased to welcome shareholders to the 2025 Annual Meeting. This year's Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format. To attend, vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/D2025 and enter the 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card or voting instruction card. Online access to the webcast will open approximately 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting. Attendance at the Annual Meeting is subject to capacity limits set by the virtual meeting platform provider. To submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting, visit www.proxyvote.com/dominion and enter your 16-digit control number. Even if you plan on attending the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares in advance online, or if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, by phone or by mail, to ensure that your vote will be represented at the Annual Meeting. For more detailed information, see the section entitled "Questions and Answers About the 2025 Annual Meeting and Voting" in the Proxy Statement. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting: The Notice of Annual Meeting, 2025 Proxy Statement, 2024 Annual Report and 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com/dominion. V69639-P28021 DOMINION ENERGY, INC. 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Wednesday, May 7, 2025, 9:30 a.m. ET This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors. The undersigned appoints Pamela J. Royal, M.D., Susan N. Story and Carlos M. Brown, or any one of them, with the power of substitution, as proxies to vote all shares of the undersigned at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 7, 2025, and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed on the reverse side by the undersigned. If this card is returned signed with no direction given, this proxy will be voted "FOR" each of the 11 director nominees named in Item 1, "FOR" Items 2 and 3 and "AGAINST" Item 4. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on any other matters that properly come before the 2025 Annual Meeting. This card also serves as voting instructions to the applicable Trustee of each of the employee 401(k) plans sponsored by Dominion Energy, Inc. or its subsidiaries (the Employee 401(k) Plans). This card, when properly executed, directs the applicable Trustee to vote the Dominion Energy shares related to your Employee 401(k) Plan account at the 2025 Annual Meeting as indicated on the reverse side. If this card is returned signed with no direction given or is not returned at all, shares will be voted by the applicable Trustee as directed by an independent fiduciary hired by the Plan Administrator for all Employee 401(k) Plans. All voting instructions will be kept confidential. You may not vote your Employee 401(k) Plan shares at the 2025 Annual Meeting. To be counted in the final tabulation, the applicable Trustee must receive your proxy instructions and vote your Employee 401(k) Plan shares no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 30, 2025. (This card must be signed and dated on the other side).
No information found
* THE VALUE IS THE MARKET VALUE AS OF THE LAST DAY OF THE QUARTER FOR WHICH THE 13F WAS FILED.
FUND | NUMBER OF SHARES | VALUE ($) | PUT OR CALL |
---|
DIRECTORS | AGE | BIO | OTHER DIRECTOR MEMBERSHIPS |
---|---|---|---|
Ms. Sutherland has served as Executive Vice President, Government Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Phillips 66 Company (Phillips 66), a Fortune 50 diversified energy manufacturing and logistics company, since February 2022. Prior to her role at Phillips 66, Ms. Sutherland was Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer for Norfolk Southern Corporation (Norfolk Southern), a rail transportation and logistics company, from March 2020 through January 2022, having previously served in other executive roles with Norfolk Southern from June 2018 to March 2020. She also previously served in senior legal counsel roles for Altria Group, Inc. and Digex, Inc. | |||
Susan N. Story INDEPENDENT LEAD DIRECTOR Age: 65 Director Since: 2017 Retired President and CEO, American Water Works Company, Inc. | |||
In determining the independence of Mr. Jibson, the NGS Committee considered the employment of Mr. Jibson’s adult, financially independent son by Dominion Energy. During part of 2024, Mr. Jibson’s son was employed by Dominion Energy Wexpro Services Company, a former subsidiary of Dominion Energy that was sold to Enbridge in June 2024, as a manager of joint operations and regulatory affairs. Mr. Jibson’s son was not an executive officer of Dominion Energy or any of its subsidiaries and received compensation in accordance with the company’s compensation practices applicable to employees of equivalent qualifications, experiences and responsibilities. The NGS Committee recommended to the Board and the Board determined that the employment of Mr. Jibson’s son did not affect Mr. Jibson’s independence. | |||
Robert H. Spilman, Jr. INDEPENDENT Age: 68 Director Since: 2009 Chairman, President and CEO, Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. | |||
Paul M. Dabbar INDEPENDENT Age: 57 Director Since: 2023 Co-founder, Bohr Quantum Technology Corp. | |||
Pamela J. Royal, M.D. INDEPENDENT Age: 62 Director Since: 2013 President, Royal Dermatology and Aesthetic Skin Care, Inc. | |||
Based on the NYSE’s and Dominion Energy’s independence standards, and considering all relevant facts and circumstances, the Board affirmatively determined that the following director nominees are independent: Messrs. Bennett, Dabbar, Hagood, Kington, Rigby and Spilman, Dr. Royal and Mses. Lovejoy, Story and Sutherland. Although they retired from the Board at last year’s Annual Meeting, the Board also affirmatively determined that Messrs. Ronald W. Jibson and Michael E. Szymanczyk were independent during their service as directors from January to May 2024. | |||
Mr. Hagood chairs the board of directors of the Lamb Institute, a non-profit organization based in Charleston, South Carolina. The Lamb Institute funds several ministries in Honduras providing funding, volunteer resources and support to schools, an orphanage and various other programs. He also serves on the board of Bravo Services, LLC, a consortium of 12 North American flooring companies representing over $2 billion in annual sales of floor covering and related supply products. | |||
Mark J. Kington INDEPENDENT Age: 65 Director Since: 2005 Managing Director, Kington Management, LP | |||
Ms. Lovejoy is a recognized thought leader in the fields of technology, risk management, resilience, compliance and governance. Ms. Lovejoy’s cybersecurity experience is invaluable to a utility company such as Dominion Energy, which must maintain the security of the electric grid and prevent interruptions in service due to cyberattacks. | |||
Mr. Rigby served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pepco Holdings, Inc. (PHI), an energy delivery company serving the mid-Atlantic region, from May 2009 to March 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Rigby held other executive officer positions with PHI and its subsidiaries, including chief operating officer and chief financial officer. He served as non-executive Chairman of South Jersey Industries, Inc. (South Jersey), an energy delivery company headquartered in Folsom, New Jersey, from 2020 to February 2025, including through South Jersey’s private acquisition in 2023. | |||
James A. Bennett INDEPENDENT Age: 63 Director Since: 2019 Executive Director of External Affairs, First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company |
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Stock
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Change in
|
|
All Other
|
|
SEC Total |
|
|
Realized Pay
|
|
||||||||
Robert M. Blue |
2024 |
$ |
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,526,987 |
|
$ |
2,189,990 |
|
$ |
795,805 |
|
$ |
166,843 |
|
$ |
12,904,625 |
|
|
$ |
6,510,494 |
|
|
Chair, President and |
2023 |
|
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
2,084,904 |
|
|
1,528,800 |
|
|
1,250,219 |
|
|
189,912 |
|
|
6,278,835 |
|
|
|
5,988,985 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
2022 |
|
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
3,320,036 |
|
|
2,023,514 |
|
|
10,107 |
|
|
216,328 |
|
|
6,794,985 |
|
|
|
4,426,266 |
|
|
Steven D. Ridge |
2024 |
|
747,500 |
|
|
|
|
1,713,871 |
|
|
740,025 |
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
102,508 |
|
|
3,307,146 |
|
|
|
1,810,170 |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
2023 |
|
641,667 |
|
|
|
|
1,033,958 |
|
|
436,800 |
|
|
3,621 |
|
|
204,776 |
|
|
2,320,822 |
|
|
|
1,485,595 |
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
2022 |
|
331,137 |
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
610,096 |
|
|
423,696 |
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
125,915 |
|
|
1,871,448 |
|
|
|
1,440,049 |
|
Diane Leopold |
2024 |
|
958,604 |
|
|
|
|
2,285,158 |
|
|
1,059,623 |
|
|
610,562 |
|
|
93,324 |
|
|
5,007,271 |
|
|
|
3,378,387 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, |
2023 |
|
928,066 |
|
|
|
|
800,038 |
|
|
1,318,394 |
|
|
1,184,938 |
|
|
101,700 |
|
|
4,333,136 |
|
|
|
4,833,231 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer and |
2022 |
|
897,388 |
|
|
|
|
800,070 |
|
|
1,235,731 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
90,276 |
|
|
3,023,464 |
|
|
|
4,054,066 |
|
|
President – Contracted Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Carlos M. Brown |
2024 |
|
747,500 |
|
|
|
|
1,713,871 |
|
|
779,625 |
|
|
240,514 |
|
|
54,191 |
|
|
3,535,701 |
|
|
|
2,117,090 |
|
|
President – Dominion Energy |
2023 |
|
641,748 |
|
|
|
|
400,049 |
|
|
436,800 |
|
|
367,930 |
|
|
39,987 |
|
|
1,886,514 |
|
|
|
1,744,832 |
|
|
Services and Executive Vice |
2022 |
|
591,392 |
|
|
|
|
300,016 |
|
|
424,042 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
51,862 |
|
|
1,367,312 |
|
|
|
1,455,017 |
|
|
President, Chief Legal Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Edward H. Baine |
2024 |
|
576,170 |
|
|
|
|
1,028,311 |
|
|
476,876 |
|
|
344,914 |
|
|
37,143 |
|
|
2,463,414 |
|
|
|
1,599,183 |
|
|
President – Dominion Energy Virginia |
2023 |
|
528,852 |
|
|
|
|
260,011 |
|
|
485,403 |
|
|
600,260 |
|
|
38,583 |
|
|
1,913,109 |
|
|
|
1,810,469 |
|
Customers
Suppliers
Price
Yield
Owner | Position | Direct Shares | Indirect Shares |
---|---|---|---|
BLUE ROBERT M | - | 176,240 | 4,017 |
Leopold Diane | - | 88,126 | 3,474 |
Baine Edward H | - | 43,627 | 4,870 |
Brown Carlos M | - | 38,416 | 28 |
Baine Edward H | - | 31,031 | 4,394 |
Ridge Steven D | - | 28,781 | 0 |
STORY SUSAN N | - | 22,162 | 13,346 |
Ridge Steven D | - | 12,673 | 0 |
BENNETT JAMES A | - | 8,970 | 23,281 |
RIGBY JOSEPH M | - | 8,417 | 22,232 |
Sutherland Vanessa Allen | - | 475 | 8,572 |