DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[ X ] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2015
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission File Number: 000-54851
CANYON GOLD CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Nevada
|
Not Applicable
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
4730 South Fort Apache Road, Suite 300, Las Vegas, Nevada 89147
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(800) 520-9485
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
|
Large accelerated filer
|
[ ]
|
Accelerated filer
|
[ ]
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
[ ]
|
Smaller reporting company
|
[X] |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [ X ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing sales price, or the average bid and asked price on such stock, as of October 31, 2014, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, was $1,619,976. Shares of the registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each entity or person that, to the registrant’s knowledge, owned 10% or more of registrant’s outstanding common stock as of October 31, 2014 have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of July 29, 2015 was 21,049,691.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
A description of "Documents Incorporated by Reference" is contained in Part IV, Item 15.
CANYON GOLD CORP.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page | |
|
PART I
|
||
|
Item 1.
|
Business
|
3
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
19
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
19
|
|
Item 2.
|
Properties
|
19
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
19
|
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
19
|
|
PART II
|
||
|
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 19 |
|
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
21
|
|
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 21 |
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
26
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
26
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
26 |
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
26
|
|
Item 9B
|
Other Information
|
27
|
|
PART III
|
||
|
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
27
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
29
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 30 |
|
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
|
31
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
|
32
|
|
PART IV
|
||
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
|
33
|
|
Signatures
|
34
|
|
|
As used in this report, unless otherwise indicated, “we”, “us”, “our”, “Canyon Gold” and the “Company” refer to Canyon Gold Corp.
|
||
2
Canyon Gold Corp. presently holds mining claims and leases located in the State of Nevada. According to SEC Industry Guide No. 7, we are classified or considered an exploration stage mineral company defined as a company engaged in the search for mineral deposits or reserves of precious and base metal targets, which are not in either the development or production stage.
In July 2011, we acquired 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp. of North Vancouver BC, Canada, formerly Ferguson Holdings Ltd. (“
Long Canyon
”), whereby Long Canyon became our wholly owned subsidiary. As a result of the acquisition, Canyon Gold and Long Canyon owned and controlled a 100% interest in approximately 640 acres of mineral lease properties and/or 30 BLM mineral lease claims, situated in the west section of the new Long Canyon Gold Trend area of east central Nevada. Each of the 30 claims in Section 35 is a Federal BLM unpatented lode claims, 20 acres in size and includes placer rights in Nevada. The actual area of the 30 claims is 600 acres and the balance of approximately 40 acres in Section 35 consists of a slough and swampy pond area. The claims were initially listed as CG #1 through CG#30.
In exchange for the acquisition of Long Canyon, we issued to the stockholders of Long Canyon 27,998,699 shares of our common stock and 500,000 Series B preferred shares, which are convertible into a total of 5.0 million of our common shares. The Series B preferred shares were assigned to Development Resources LLC (“
DRLLC
”) as consideration for the 30 BLM mineral lease claims previously acquired by Long Canyon from DRLLC. On July 22, 2011, we issued to EMAC, 600,000 Series A preferred shares, convertible into 6.0 million shares of common stock. The Series A preferred shares satisfied certain payables to EMAC in connection with Long Canyon’s acquisition of mineral claims and certain related party payables. The payables refer to certain executive and administrative services provided to Canyon Gold and Long Canyon. Also, at the time of the Long Canyon acquisition, Long Canyon and Canyon Gold agreed that the 600,000 Series A preferred shares would be transferred to EMAC in consideration for a payable to EMAC. The preferred shares are only convertible into common stock starting 12 months after the first day that our common stock is traded on the on the OTC-Bulletin Board, now the OTCQB.
We have engaged DRLLC of American Fork, Utah to conduct preliminary studies of our claims. We intend to conduct exploration activities on the properties in phases. We plan to explore for gold, silver and other minerals on the property covering an area of approximately 640 acres. There can be no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our property. Extensive exploration will be required before we can make a final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility of any potential deposit.
Our principal executive office is located at 4730 South Fort Apache Road, Suite 300, Las Vegas, Nevada 89147, telephone (1-800) 520-9485. Additional office space is subleased from EMAC at 641 West 3rd Street, North Vancouver BC, Canada. The office of DRLLC that is responsible for management of exploration program is located at 125 East Main Street # 307, American Fork, Utah 84003.
Corporate Name Changes
The Company was originally incorporated in the State of Delaware on May 27, 1998 as Mayne International, Inc. Our corporate name was changed to Black Dragon Entertainment, Inc. on September 5, 2000, then to Vita Biotech Corporation on July 31, 2002, and to August Energy Corp. on May 27, 2004. We changed our corporate name to the current Canyon Gold Corp. on March 21, 2011.
Recent Events
On June 6, 2015, Canyon Gold Corp. entered into an agreement to acquire 90% of Vaportech3d LLC, a privately held Nevada limited liability company, formerly known as EMAC Holdings, LLC, a related party, (“
Vaportech
”), owner of the Cedar Leaf Oil Vapor Technology (the “
Technology
”). Vaportech will operate as a subsidiary of Canyon Gold and the acquisition will be accounted for as a business acquisition. In consideration for the acquisition, Canyon Gold will issue 500,000 shares of Canyon Gold Preferred Shares, Series “B” Convertible (“Series “B” Shares”) to those persons directed by Vaportech’s management. The previous owner that transferred the Technology to Vaportech will retain a 10% ownership in Vaportech. The Series “B” Shares do not have voting rights, but each share is convertible into 10 shares of Canyon Gold Common Stock.
3
Cedar Leaf Oil Vapor Technology disinfects occupied buildings safely using vapor from naturally produced Western Red Cedar Leaf Oil. Vaportech plans to develop, market and distribute the Technology to hospitals and other facilities, which is intended to provide a solution to the problem of antimicrobial resistant organisms (AROs). Research by the Technology developers at Medicine University of British Columbia has shown that Cedar Leaf Oil Vapor is both safe to use in occupied buildings and is effective at killing antimicrobial resistant organisms that are plaguing hospitals. MRSA, VRE, and C difficile are three bacteria commonly found in Canadian hospitals. They can cause symptoms ranging from asymptomatic colonization to septic shock and death. Treatment of these infections is more costly than prevention due to prolonged hospitalization, special control measures, expensive treatments and extensive surveillance.
The Vaportech Technology is based on how the Western Red Cedar tree works in the forest to protect itself from the many fungi, mold and bacteria that exist in the natural environment. The purpose of mold and bacteria in the forest is to breakdown and decay other living organisms overtaking and rotting trees to the ground. Mold and bacteria produce metabolic byproducts that can serve as early indicators of potential bio-contamination problems. MVOCs are produced as a metabolic by-product of bacteria and mold and are detectable before any visible signs of microbial growth appear. These toxins are recognized as contributors to persons counteracting asthma and other sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms.
The Western Red Cedar tree remains immune to the devastating effects of these microbial contaminates due to its inherent immunity from its ability to emit volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) from the leaf. The Vaportech Technology replicates this effect through the diffusion of the Cedar Leaf Oil Vapor (CLOV) in parts per trillion (PPT) into the envelopes of buildings, homes, aircraft, and hospitals. Similar to Vicks VapoRub the Technology penetrates unseen spaces in buildings, utilizing the natural air movement and pressurization to combat bioaerosols that float around in the air penetrating wall cavities and air ducts. Surfaces like keyboards, telephones carpets and sinks are sanitized throughout the ventilation cycle giving buildings a proactive cleaning.
Controlling surface and airborne microbes is beneficial to a facility at many levels. These include improved IAQ, reduced sick days, energy savings, maintenance savings, equipment efficiency and service life, water conservation, and LEED point’s contribution.
The patented Vaportech System is a portable unit that attaches to air handling equipment. It is designed to mitigate levels of bacteria, mold and viruses in buildings. The Vaportech system distributes Cedar Leaf Oil Vapor throughout the building envelope in a gaseous state, which penetrates the entire building including air ducts, wall cavities, humidifiers, cooling coils and other areas that can propagate bioaerosols. The Cedar Leaf Oil Diffusion System eliminates the majority of Indoor Air Quality Variables through the diffusion of Cedar Leaf Oil in the building’s air handler.
In addition to the 500,000 Series “B” Shares to be issued at the closing, Canyon Gold will use its best efforts to secure up to a maximum of $500,000 in funding and to assist with planned operational expansion and operation of Vaportech and the Technology. There can be no assurance that the necessary funds will be raised. Also, Canyon Gold will pay additional Series “B” Shares in the event gross sales of the Technology attain the following thresholds:
|
Gross Sales of $5,000,000
|
250,000 Series “B” Shares
|
|
Accumulated Gross Sales of $18,000,000
|
500,000 Series “B” Shares
|
|
Accumulated Gross Sales of $36,000,000
|
1,000,000 Series “B” Shares
|
Further, the previous owner of the Technology and 10% owner of Vaportech will receive a royalty of five percent (5%) of Gross Sales.
Because Vaportech was a related party prior to the acquisition, we anticipate the value of the shares issued will be recorded at the predecessor cost of the assets and liabilities of Vaportech.
Vaportech will continue to be managed by its current management. Vaportech will appoint one director to Canyon Gold’s Board of Directors and Canyon Gold will appoint one director to Vaportech’s Board.
4
It is anticipated that the transaction will close on or before July 31, 2015. The closing is subject to the successful conclusion of due diligence by each party.
Our Strategy
Our goal is to secure sufficient capital to conduct the business of exploration and mineral project development on our approximately 640 acres of mineral lease properties and/or 30 BLM mineral lease claims, situated in the west section of the new Long Canyon Gold Trend area of east central Nevada. As funding permits, we will also continue to examine viable mineral leases that could potentially enhance our mineral property portfolio.
As discussed above under
Recent Events,
assuming a successful conclusion of due diligence and closing of the Vaportech acquisition, we will use our best efforts to secure up to a maximum of $500,000 in funding for and to assist with planned operational expansion and operation of Vaportech and the Technology.
Current Business
On May 15, 2011, Long Canyon entered into an option agreement with EMAC Handels AG (“
EMAC
”) of Pfaeffikon, Switzerland. EMAC owned and controlled a 100% interest in 275 mineral lease claims situated on approximately 6,250 acres of mineral lease properties adjoining the 640 acres owned by Long Canyon. EMAC initially acquired these claims from DRLLC. The option agreement allowed Long Canyon to earn a 100% interest in the 6,250 acres for the exercise price of $900,000 cash. The agreement also provided to EMAC a 2% Net Smelter Royalty on the 275 claims subject to the option agreement. On May 31, 2014 pursuant to an extension of the option agreement, the exercise period of the option agreement was extended to December 31, 2014.
On April 7, 2014, the Canyon Gold, on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiary, Long Canyon, executed an agreement with EMAC to acquire a 100% interest in 180 mineral lease claims in the Long Canyon Trend of Elko County, Nevada. Canyon Gold issued 12,000,000 restricted shares of its common stock to EMAC, valued at $240,000.
Canyon Gold and EMAC were unable to make the large required annual mineral lease payments due in September 2014 to maintain the 275 optioned claims and the 180 purchased claims. Therefore, these mineral interests were not renewed.
As a result, our current mineral property interests are comprised of the 30 BLM mineral lease claims, situated in the west section of the new Long Canyon Gold Trend area of east central Nevada. These properties are located next to other exploration projects owned by other mining companies in the Long Canyon Gold Trend. All of the claims are located in Section 35, T 34N R63E, Mount Diablo Base & Meridian (Meridian MDB&M). We intend to explore the claims for gold and silver mineralization deposits.
The property rights to each claim are acquired by first staking the ground with a legal marker wooden post with identification of the location, date of staking location and owners name attached to each post. The locator or owner then has a period of time to then file the Mining Claim Notices with the County Recorders office and, in this case, in Elko County, Nevada. A fee is paid for this filing and a County Stamp with the date of such recording is put on each Claim Location Notice. The locator or owner then has up to 90 days from the location date on the Claim Notice to file and pay an additional fee to the BLM in Reno, Nevada to record the ownership of each claim with the BLM. The locator or owner is then officially listed with both the County and the BLM as having the mineral claim control to the claims and holds complete ownership interest in the surface rights and subsurface rights to all minerals on the claims up to the new required notice to hold date, which is the following next September 1 date from the date of the location on the Claim Notice. It is officially recognized that the locator or owner has such rights on the ground that each claim is located on from the date the posts are put in the ground on the claim with the attached document as well until the proper recording dates required by the County and the BLM.
It should be noted that we did not make requisite assessment payments on the 30 claims by the September 1, 2014 due date (final payment due September 3) that necessitated re-staking the claims and making new filing and payments to retain the claims. Our consultants, DRLLC, re-staked the claims on September 5, 2014 and registered the claims with the Elko County Recorders office. The claims are listed as CG#1 through CG#30. We subsequently made the requisite filings and paid the applicable fees with the BLM within 90 days from the re-staking date. The claims are fully staked and registered and in good standing to September 1, 2015.
5
In January 2012, DRLLC prepared the preliminary geological report on our properties. Alex Burton of Burton Consulting Inc., was the consulting geologist for DRLLC and conducted additional fieldwork from May 19 to May 29, 2012 as part of the requirements for dissemination of his final geology report. Mr. Burton, an exploration geologist and geochemist, has become a member of our advisory board. Titles to the 30 claims (approximately 640 acres) were originally recorded in the name of DRLLC; however the title has been transferred to Canyon Gold.
Our agreement with DRLLC obligated Long Canyon to pay to DRLLC $30,000 to complete full staking and acquisition of mineral lease claims. DRLLC would then assign to Long Canyon a 100% interest in the claims, subject to DRLLC holding a 3% Net Smelter Royalty on the claims. Long Canyon is further obligated to pay all BLM and State of Nevada registration fees and to perform initial exploration work on the claims. Also, DRLLC will retain a first right of refusal to buy back the claims in the event Long Canyon / Canyon Gold intends to sell the claims.
We are conducting exploration activities on the properties in phases. We intend to explore for gold, silver and other minerals on the property covering an area of approximately 640 acres. There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our property. Extensive exploration will be required before we can make a final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility of any potential deposit.
Exploration Properties
Our mineral lease properties are located in the Long Canyon Gold Trend in the Spruce Mountain Mining District, Nevada. The area is generally characterized by an average elevation of approximately 5,600 feet and is made up of gentle rising hills and ridges to about 6,000 feet to the west and 5,800 feet to the east. The ridges and elevation increase to the south to an elevation of 6,800 feet at Ventosa Peak. The highest elevation in the district is Spruce Mountain at an elevation of just over 10,000 feet, located approximately 16 miles due south of our claims. The trees on these properties are small Spruce, Pine and scrub brush, not densely covered with many open areas on the higher ridges and side slopes with open areas in the small valleys at lower elevations.
All of our claims are located in one block in a semi-remote area with no infrastructure in place. The only access to the properties is by historic gravel or dirt roads and trails. There is no current access to water or power, although we do not foresee a need during the first phases of exploration. Typically, all contract personnel carry their own water and have portable generators for their operations, including phase two drill programs. Drilling operators supply tanker trucks for their water needs.
In the event an ore body is discovered as a result of our exploration programs, significant additional funding would be necessary to proceed. In order to satisfy this need, we anticipate seeking a strategic partnership or joint venture with a much larger mining company in order to fund additional heavy exploration drilling, feasibility studies and establishing mining operations. A feasibility study would detail the costs to provide all infrastructure including, but not limited to, pumping water from underground sources or building lakes to hold such water needs, building electrical lines to the area for needed power or using stand alone large generator systems to provide necessary power. It is our intent to remain an exploration company and to seek a partner to further develop and operate our properties. Presently, there can be no assurance that we will discover minerals in a commercially viable amount or that we would be able to secure a strategic partner to provide necessary funding to become operational.
Regulatory Requirements
In order to maintain the Company’s claims and/or leases, we must make annual payments to the Bureau Land Management (“
BLM
”) and State of Nevada, due in September of each year. Payment to the BLM is $145 per claim and the State of Nevada is $70 per claim. We currently own the 30 BLM mineral leases for which we are obligated to make annual payments.
6
Phase one of our exploration program, completing a preliminary geological report on our four sections of BLM mineral lease claims, required no permits or bonding,
provided
there was no surface land disturbance of more than one-third acre. Phase two, provided preliminary geological reports are favorable, will proceed with a drill program to confirm mineralization on these target areas from the surface to depth. If initial core samples show evidence of gold mineralization, a geological, grid maps will be produced to lay out an extensive drill program to define a potential mineable ore body. Phase two will require an “Access and Land Use Permit” from the BLM and State of Nevada. Generally, this will require about 30 days for the filing process and cost approximately $12,000 for a bond to assure the reclamation of the subject areas. Pending requisite funding, we have no current plans to begin phase two.
Royalties
Presently, we are committed to pay a 3% Net Smelter Royalty (“
NSR
”) to DRLLC on all of our 30 claims pursuant to the agreement between DRLLC and Long Canyon.
Maps of Properties
The following are maps and pictures of the Company’s properties.
7
8
9
10
11
12
CLAIMS AREA
13
History
Spruce Mountain Mining District
Our properties lie at the north end of the Spruce Mountain district, in southern Elko County, approximately 19 miles south of Wells, Nevada. The properties are located near Highway 93 on the old Tobar Road, which provides easy access to the area. The Spruce Mountain district covers the north flank and summit of Spruce Mountain and part of the Spruce Mountain Ridge to the north. Spruce Mountain and Spruce Mountain Ridge form a somewhat isolated spur between the Pequop Mountains on the east and Clover Valley on the west.
Spruce Mountain has seen mining activity since 1869. During the early years, small communities such as Sprucemont, Spruce, Hickneytown, Monarch, Black Forest, Latham, Jasper, Steptoe, Johnson, and Killie were founded and then declined. These mining camps stretched for six miles, from the western to the eastern slopes of Spruce Mountain. In 1869, W.B. Latham discovered the Latham mine, later renamed the Killie. The lead-silver ore was sufficiently valuable that a small rush of prospectors came to the area. Within months, three new mines, the Black Forest, the Juniper, and the Fourth of July, began production.
Three separate mining districts, the Latham, Johnson and Steptoe districts, were initially created in the Spruce Mountain area. On September 26, 1871, the three districts were consolidated, and the Spruce Mountain Mining District was created.
From 1869 to the 1930's, lead, silver, copper and zinc were produced from several underground mines in the Spruce Mountain district. The Standard and Old Paramount mines are on the RenGold Spruce Mountain property. Several other historical underground workings are located to the east of the property.
No production has taken place on Spruce Mountain since 1961. Some exploration occurred through the 1980s, but none were considered worthy of extensive mining. Between 1958 and 1982, several companies conducted exploration for porphyry molybdenum deposits throughout the district. In 1984 and 1985, Santa Fe Mining Inc. remapped the western portion of the district, took rock and soil samples, conducted a VLF survey and drilled 33 RC holes, 30 of these on the Spruce Mountain property. Several of these holes intersected gold mineralization in the northern part of the Spruce Mountain property (the North Target) leading to recent in the district for gold potential.
In 1996 and 1997, Battle Mountain Gold Corp explored primarily to the east of the Spruce Mountain property. Between 1997 and 2009, Teck Resources, Inc. and Nevada Pacific Gold (US) Inc. explored the property. In 2009 AuEx took rock samples, staked the SM claims and quitclaimed the claims to Renaissance in 2010.
Geology
The oldest rocks exposed in the Spruce Mountain district consist of limestone of the Ordovician Pogonip Formation, which crops out on the summit and west slope of Spruce Mountain. It is overlain by, or is in fault contact with limestone, dolomite, shale, and quartzite of the Silurian through Permian ages. The sedimentary rocks are tilted gently to moderately eastward, displaced along the Spruce Mountain thrust fault, and are cut by steep north-northwest and east-trending normal faults.
The sedimentary rocks have been intruded by a granite porphyry dike that cuts across the north side of Spruce Mountain in a northeasterly direction. This porphyry, where seen near the Killie mine and east of the Black Forest mine, is bleached and kaolinized, and contains sericite, euhedral quartz phenocrysts, and some fine-grained sulfides. Many of the mines and prospects in the district are found along the trend of this porphyry dike. Three or more small or irregular stocks of granite porphyry and diorite are intruded along and near the crest of the ridge.
Limestone adjacent to some of the intrusive contacts is metamorphosed to skarn consisting of quartz, calcite, garnet, fluorite, actinolite, diopside, and other pyroxenes. The largest metamorphic zone is on the west side of the range. Between the contact zone and the main dike, there are two prominent knoblike outcrops of iron-oxide stained quartz-cemented breccias pipe. On the east side of the range, the northeastward continuation of the zone of intrusive is marked by outcrops of jasperoid.
14
Two kinds of metalliferous ore bodies have been mined in the Spruce Mountain district; (i) bedded replacement deposits of lead, silver, copper, and (ii) zinc in limestone and skarn, and fissure-filling stock work deposits of lead and silver with minor gold along normal faults in limestone, skarn, quartz breccias, and granite porphyry. Replacement deposits in limestone and skarn occur near the center of the district. Ore shoots were commonly a few feet thick, and as much as 100 feet long. Mineralization extended up to 100 feet away from the fissures into the limestone host rock. Bedded replacement deposits yielded most of the early production from the district.
The deepest ore shoot in the district was mined to the 520-foot level in the Monarch mine. To the northeast, at the Humbug mine and nearby prospects, outcrops of gossan and jasperoid occur in siliceous breccias along shear zones in limestone.
Most orebodies in the district were mined primarily for lead and silver, with increasing amounts of zinc recovered in the later years of production. Orebodies in which copper predominates generally occur adjacent to the intrusive bodies. Proportions of lead, silver, gold, copper, and zinc vary widely among the different orebodies.
Recent Activity
Our properties are in immediate proximity on the north to a 35 square mile area owned by Renaissance Gold, in joint venture with NuLegacy Gold. The two companies have collected soil samples and exposed rock chip samples that may indicate anomalous gold.
In February 2011, Newmont Gold acquired properties in the Spruce Mountain area and has extended its gold exploration activities. Frontier Gold and AuEx Ventures are joint venturing in exploration drilling to define a possible gold ore body in the area. AuEx Ventures has also entered into a joint venture drilling project with Agnico-Eagle USA in an area adjoining our properties to the west. The Renaissance Gold Group has formed a joint venture with NuLegacy Gold to conduct exploration activities in close proximity to our properties. Just to the south of our properties is another Renaissance Gold project called the Spruce Mountain Prospect.
Plan of Operations
With the completion of phase one of our exploration program and receipt of the final geology report and its recommendations to continue with Phase Two of the Company’s exploration program, we will need an estimated $1,057,200 in funds for drilling and engineering studies to determine whether the mineral deposit is commercially viable. If we are unable to raise additional funds for this work, we would be unable to proceed, even if a mineral deposit is discovered.
Phase Two
Premised on and supported by the findings set forth in the final geology report, phase two will proceed as funds are available with continued exploration and a drill program to confirm mineralization on the target areas from the surface to depth. Typically, exploration results that will warrant phase two work include:
|
●
|
Analysis of surface geochemical sample results with values that are suggestive of a mineral deposit, when considered in the context of the geologic setting of the property;
|
|
●
|
Analysis of geophysical anomalies that are suggestive of a mineral deposit considered in the context of the geologic setting of the property; and
|
|
●
|
Interpretation of geological results that is indicative of a favorable setting for a mineral deposit.
|
These results are usually interpreted in conjunction with current metal-market conditions, management’s corporate goals and the potential for phase two plans to facilitate the discovery process. The first phase of our two-phase exploration program on our property was completed in July 2012 and the final geology report delivered in September 2012. The final report indicates a plan for further exploration, including an initial drilling program, with recommendations and budgets.
15
Alex Burton, exploration geologist and geochemist and a member of our advisory board, is responsible for the final geology report. Based on the conclusions set forth in the report and the preliminary exploration results obtained in phase one, management is confident that our properties are sufficiently positioned geologically to proceed with phase two.
All core drill samples will be sent to the ALS Chemex Labs for assay results. In the event these first drill core sample assays show substantial gold mineralization, a geological grid map will be produced to lay out an extensive “in-fill” drill program to define a potential mineable ore body. Once an ore body is defined by these drill program, a feasibility report will be produced to prepare and perform an application to all Nevada regulatory agencies for mining operation permits.
Our ability to complete the two-phase exploration will be dependent on our available funds and the ability to raise additional necessary funds as required. Phase two will require renting certain heavy-duty equipment to open new trails into the target area and perform some open trenching to gather deeper samples. The following is our estimate of the cost to successfully complete the first two phases. Our estimates for phase two are based on the findings set forth in the final geology report and are divided into two stages.
Phase Two – Estimated Exploration Costs as per the final geology report
:
|
Stage “A”
|
||||||
|
●
|
Geochemistry
|
|||||
|
Hand held Auger Pediment and Upper slope soil sampling
|
||||||
|
Combined with surface cobble sampling
|
||||||
|
20 line of 6000m length at 50m spacings includes $30 analysis
|
$
|
80,000
|
||||
|
Blasting and Channel sampling outcrops on upper slopes and pediment
|
80,000
|
|||||
|
Valley Flats ATV mounted auger sampling includes $30 assay
|
80,000
|
|||||
|
Water Well drill (RC type)
|
||||||
|
30 holes to 60 feet at $25/foot
|
45,000
|
|||||
|
●
|
Collection and assay costs $70 per sample 30 holes X 10 samples
|
21,000
|
||||
|
●
|
Geophysical surveys
|
170,000
|
||||
|
●
|
Engineering
|
45,000
|
||||
|
●
|
Contingency (20%)
|
104,200
|
||||
|
Total Estimated budget, Stage A
|
$
|
625,200
|
||||
It is possible that inflation may affect the exploration costs, as analytical, geophysical, and drilling costs have seen increases.
|
Stage “B”
|
||||
|
Stage B exploration is sequential after assay results have been evaluated. A new report is not required. Further exploration will require the drilling of a series of about a dozen Reverse Circulation drill holes to depths ranging from 4 00 feet to 1000 feet. This is usually followed by a series holes drilled with a diamond drill to firm up the grades obtained in the RC (Reverse Circulation) drilling so that greater validity can be assigned to the ore grades for reserve and resource calculations.
|
||||
|
Reverse circulation of 12 holes to 400 feet with engineering plus assays is $75 per foot with 20% contingency will total (Stage B)
|
$
|
432,000
|
||
|
Total cost for PHASE TWO, Stage A and B
|
1,057,200
|
|||
|
TOTAL - Phase One and Phase Two
|
1,165,123
|
|||
|
● Exercise of options ($350,000) and general expenses ($50,000)
|
400,000
|
|||
|
TOTAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
|
$
|
1,565,123
|
||
Note: Please be advised of the following terms used in the table above:
16
IP/resistivity
: During phase two, we may use a program called Induced Polarization (IP), which can be used to further define deeper mineralization zones on the properties. This is performed by placing metal electrodes at interval spacing on a laid out grid according to the suitable format for the mineralized zone and the property location. Electrical impulses are then passed through these electrodes, sending back a recorded signal that can define a certain measured decay of mineralization below the surface, thus defining potential higher-grade areas for further testing programs such as drilling.
Exposed mineralized zones
: We anticipate phase one will define possible mineralized zones on the properties, which will further define potential drill targets.
Final geology report
: The final geology report, provided by a qualified, licensed geologist, written to the requirements of the NI43.101 Technical Report, will describe in detail all of the exploration data, testing results and all other operations performed on the properties as well as a definitive further exploration program with suggested costs to enter into and perform the next phase of the expected exploration.
Our exploration expenditures for phase one have been $107,923 and we anticipate an additional $1,057,200 to complete phase two. Each phase of our proposed exploration will be assessed to determine whether the results warrant further work. If exploration results on the initial phases do not warrant drilling or further exploration, we will suspend operations on the property. We will then seek additional exploration properties and additional funding with which to conduct the work. In the event that we are unable to obtain additional financing or additional properties, we may not be able to continue active business operations.
Historically, we have incurred operating losses and will not be able to exist indefinitely without securing additional operating funds. In the view of our independent auditors, we require additional funds to maintain our operations and these conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We will not be conducting any product research or development over the next 12 months. We do not expect to purchase any plant or significant equipment over the next 12 months. We do not have employees and do not expect add employees over the next 12 months. Our current management team will satisfy our requirements for the foreseeable future.
Competition
The exploration for and exploitation of mineral reserves is highly competitive with many local, national and international companies in the marketplace. We must compete against several established companies in the industry that are better financed and/or who have closer working relationships with productive mining companies. We will most likely seek a strategic relationship with a more established and larger mining company to provide assistance in developing our property into production, if exploration results so warrant. We have not entered into any agreements with any third parties to produce any minerals from our property, nor have we identified any potential partners in that regards, nor is there any assurance we will be able to secure such agreements. If we are unable to identify and/or partner with any third parties to assist us in attaining production grade minerals, we will likely be unsuccessful in producing any such minerals.
17
Government Regulation
Because we are engaged in the mineral exploration activities, we are exposed to many governmental and environmental risks associated with our business. We are currently in the initial exploration stages and management has not determined whether significant site reclamation costs will be required.
Environmental and other government regulations at the federal, state and local level may include:
|
●
|
surface impact;
|
|
●
|
water acquisition and treatment;
|
|
●
|
site access;
|
|
●
|
reclamation;
|
|
●
|
wildlife preservation;
|
|
●
|
licenses and permits; and
|
|
●
|
maintaining the environment.
|
Regulatory compliance in the mining industry is complex and the failure to meet and satisfy various requirements can result in fines, civil or criminal penalties or other limitations.
In the event we are able to secure funding necessary to implement a bona fide exploration program, we will be subject to regulation by numerous governmental authorities. In order to maintain our claims, we must make annual payments to the BLM and the State of Nevada. If we proceed to phase two drilling, we must secure an Access and Land Use Permit. Subsequently, operating and environmental permits will be required from applicable regulatory bodies using technical applications filed by us. The failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approvals or licenses will adversely affect our ability to explore our property and otherwise carry out our business plan.
Any exploration or production on United States Federal land will have to comply with the Federal Land Management Planning Act, which has the effect generally of protecting the environment. Any exploration or production on private property, whether owned or leased, will have to comply with the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act. The costs of complying with environmental concerns under any of these acts vary on a case-by-case basis. In many instances the cost can be prohibitive to development. Environmental costs associated with a particular project must be factored into the overall cost evaluation of whether to proceed with the project.
There are no costs to us at the present time except for annual fee payments related to the claims and reclamation bonding requirements of the Bureau of Land Management in connection with compliance with environmental laws. However, because we anticipate engaging in natural resource projects, these costs could occur at any time and the potential liability extensive.
Trademarks and Copyrights
We do not own any patents, trademarks or copyrights.
Employees
We presently do not have any employees and do not anticipate adding employees until our business operations and financial resources so warrant. We consider our current management to be sufficient to satisfy our requirements for the foreseeable future. Our exploration program is contracted to Development Resources LLC. and is payable in both cash and stock.
Facilities
We presently rent office facilities in Las Vegas, Nevada that serve as our principal executive offices. The facilities are rented on a month-to-month basis on terms of $497 per month.
Employee Stock Plan
We have not adopted any kind of stock or stock option plan for employees at this time.
18
Industry Segments
No information is presented regarding industry segments. We are presently a development stage company that has been seeking potential business opportunities. Reference is made to the statements of income included in this Form 10-K for a report of our operating history for the past two fiscal years.
This item is not required for a smaller reporting company.
This item is not required for a smaller reporting company.
We do not presently own any property except for the Claims discussed in Item 1 above.
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any subsidiary is a party, or to which any property is subject and, to the best of our knowledge, no such action against us is contemplated or threatened.
This item is not applicable.
Item 5
.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our common stock was accepted for quotation on the OTCQB on September 5, 2012 under the symbol “CGCC”. Previously, the shares were quoted on the OTC Pink Market, although there was not an active trading market. Set forth in the table below are the quarterly high and low prices of our common stock as obtained from the OTCQB for the past two fiscal years ended April 30, 2015.
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||
|
Fiscal year ended April 30, 2015
|
||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 0.60 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.19 | ||||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.07 | ||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 0.185 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
|
Fiscal year ended April 30, 2014
|
||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 0.55 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.10 | ||||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 0.29 | $ | 0.081 | ||||
|
Fourth Quarter
(1)
|
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
(1) The above quotes for the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended April 30, 2014 reflect and have been adjusted for the reverse stock split on a one share for twenty shares basis, which became effective on April 4, 2014. All other quotes are on a pre-split basis.
As of July 29, 2015, there were approximately 102 stockholders of record of our common stock, which does not take into account those shareholders whose certificates are held in the name of broker-dealers or other nominee accounts.
19
Secondary trading of our shares may be subject to certain state imposed restrictions. Except for the OTCB, we have no immediate plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with any person concerning the development of a trading market in any of our securities. The ability of individual stockholders to trade their shares in a particular state may be subject to various rules and regulations of that state. A number of states require that an issuer's securities be registered in their state or appropriately exempted from registration before the securities are permitted to trade in that state. Presently, we have no plans to register our securities in any particular state.
Penny Stock Rule
It is unlikely that our securities will be listed on any national or regional exchange or The Nasdaq Stock Market in the foreseeable future. Therefore our shares most likely will be subject to the provisions of Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-9 of the Exchange Act, commonly referred to as the "penny stock" rule. Section 15(g) sets forth certain requirements for broker-dealer transactions in penny stocks and Rule 15g-9(d)(1) incorporates the definition of penny stock as that used in Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act.
The SEC generally defines a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Rule 3a51-1 provides that any equity security is considered to be a penny stock unless that security is:
|
●
|
registered and traded on a national securities exchange meeting specified criteria set by the SEC;
|
|
●
|
authorized for quotation on The Nasdaq Stock Market;
|
|
●
|
issued by a registered investment company;
|
|
●
|
excluded from the definition on the basis of price (at least $5.00 per share) or the issuer's net tangible assets; or
|
|
●
|
exempted from the definition by the SEC.
|
A broker-dealer who sells penny stocks to a person other than an established customer or accredited investor is subject to additional sales practice requirements. An accredited investor is generally defined as a person with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with their spouse.
For transactions covered by these rules, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such securities and must receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require the delivery, prior to the first transaction, of a risk disclosure document relating to the penny stock market. A broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, a monthly statement must be sent to the client disclosing recent price information for the penny stocks held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, these rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to trade and/or maintain a market in our common stock and may affect the ability of stockholders to sell their shares.
These requirements may be considered cumbersome by broker-dealers and could impact the willingness of a particular broker-dealer to make a market in our shares, or they could affect the value at which our shares trade. Classification of the shares as penny stocks increases the risk of an investment in our shares.
Rule 144
All of our outstanding common shares were issued in private transactions and considered restricted securities, except for those shares included in our August 2012 registration statement. Rule 144 is the common means for stockholders to resell restricted securities and for affiliates, to sell their securities, either restricted on non restricted (control) shares. Rule 144 was amended, effective February 15, 2008.
20
Under the amended Rule 144, an affiliate of a company filing reports under the Exchange Act who has held their shares for more than six months, may sell in any three-month period an amount of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
●
|
the average weekly trading volume in the common stock, as reported through the automated quotation system of a registered securities association, during the four calendar weeks preceding such sale, or
|
|
●
|
1% of the shares then outstanding.
|
Sales by affiliates under Rule 144 are also subject to certain requirements as to the manner of sale, filing appropriate notice and the availability of current public information about the issuer.
A non-affiliate stockholder of a reporting company who has held their shares for more than six months, may make unlimited resales under Rule 144,
provided
only that the issuer has available current public information about itself. After a one-year holding period, a non-affiliate may make unlimited sales with no other requirements or limitations.
An important exception to the above described availability of the amended Rule 144 is that Rule 144 is not available for either a reporting or non-reporting shell company, unless the company:
|
●
|
has ceased to be a shell company;
|
|
●
|
is subject to the Exchange Act reporting obligations;
|
|
●
|
has filed all required Exchange Act reports during the preceding twelve months; and
|
|
●
|
at least one year has elapsed from the time the company filed with the SEC current Form 10 type information reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.
|
Because Canyon Gold was previously classified as a “shell” company, stockholders holding restricted shares of common stock would not be able to rely on Rule 144 until one year after we ceased to be a shell company and filed with the SEC adequate information that we are no longer a shell company. The information included in our registration statement dated November 10, 2011 is considered adequate information and, accordingly, our stockholders, both affiliates and non-affiliates, became eligible to use Rule 144 after one year from the initial filing of the registration statement.
We cannot predict the effect any future sales under Rule 144 may have on the market price of our common stock, if a market for our shares develops, but such sales may have a substantial depressing effect on such market price.
Dividends Policy
We have never declared cash dividends on our common stock, nor do we anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
This item is not required for a smaller reporting company.
The following information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Financial statements included herewith were prepared in consideration of the reverse acquisition between Canyon Gold and Long Canyon and are prepared on a consolidated basis. The consolidated financial statements include the operating results of Long Canyon and those of Canyon Gold from the date of the acquisition, July 20, 2011, through April 30, 2015. Share amounts and per share data are depicted on a post split basis.
21
Forward Looking and Cautionary Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will” “should," “expect," "intend," "plan," anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential," "continue," or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of such terms. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. Although forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment, actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.
Going Concern
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States applicable to a going concern. At April 30, 2015, the Company has no revenues to date, has accumulated losses of $1,787,276 since inception on June 19, 2008 and had a working capital deficit of $870,424, and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which cast substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management plans to continue to provide for the capital needs during the year ending April 30, 2016 by issuing debt and equity securities and by the continued support of its related parties. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence. There is no assurance that funding will be available to continue the Company’s business operations.
Results of Operations
For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2015 compared to the fiscal year ended April 30, 2014.
We currently have no sources of operating revenues and, accordingly, no revenues were recorded for either year ended April 30, 2015 or 2014.
Total operating expenses increased from $323,744 in the year ended April 30, 2014 to $453,544 in the year ended April 30, 2015. The increase in the 2015 fiscal year was due primarily to the abandoned mineral claim expense of $240,000. We were unable to make the required annual mineral lease payments due in September 2014 to maintain the 180 mineral lease claims purchased in April 2014. Therefore, these mineral interests were not renewed and the $240,000 cost basis of the lease claims was expensed as abandoned mineral claims in the year ended April 30, 2015. In addition, management and administrative fees increased to $90,000 from $75,000. These increases in expenses were partially offset by decreases in general and administrative expenses, professional fees, directors’ fees, and exploration costs. General and administrative expenses decreased to $45,945 from $125,272, professional fees decreased to $53,799 from $79,472, directors’ fees decreased to $15,000 from $30,000 and exploration costs decreased to $8,800 from $14,000.
Other expenses decreased in fiscal 2015 to $30,658 compared to $40,997 in fiscal year 2014. This was due to interest expense increasing from $46,138 in fiscal 2014 to $73,543 in fiscal 2015 due primarily to an increase in the amortization to interest expense of debt discount related to the convertible debt payable to institutional investors. A substantial portion of our interest expense is incurred to related parties. We recorded a gain on derivative liability of $23,188 in fiscal year 2015 compared to a loss on derivative liability of $20,859 in fiscal 2014. We also realized a gain on settlement of debt of $19,697 in fiscal 2015 and $26,000 in fiscal 2014.
Our net loss for fiscal 2015 was $484,202 compared to a loss of $364,741 in fiscal 2014, primarily due to the increase in operating expenses.
We have no firm commitments for capital expenditures other than to explore our properties as funds permit. In the process of carrying out our business plan, we may determine that we cannot raise sufficient capital to support our business on acceptable terms, or at all.
22
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At April 30, 2015, we had total current assets of $6,041 (cash of $183) and total current liabilities of $876,465, resulting in a working capital deficiency of $870,424. A significant portion of our current liabilities is comprised of amounts due related parties: accrued interest payable – related parties of $11,143; convertible notes payable – related parties of $57,050; notes payable – related parties of $79,656; and payables – related parties of $369,178. We currently do not have sufficient cash to fund our operations. We anticipate that in the short-term operating funds will continue to be provided by related parties.
As of April 30, 2015, we had two convertible notes payable – related parties totaling $57,050, which may be converted into common stock of the Company at a price of $0.10 per share. In May 2014, we improved our financial position by converting a total of $131,000 principal of convertible notes payable – related parties and $49,708 accrued interest payable – related parties into shares of our common stock.
A convertible note payable – related party of $25,000 is convertible 30 days from the first day the Company’s common shares are qualified for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, which occurred in November 2012. As of April 30, 2015, the note had not been converted and therefore was in default.
As of April 30, 2015, we had other short-term notes payable – related parties totaling $79,656. These notes bear interest at an annual rate of 6% and are currently past due.
Accrued interest payable – related parties was $11,143 at April 30, 2015.
As of April 30, 2015, we had a convertible note payable to a non-related party in the amount of $11,000, bearing no interest. The note is convertible into common stock of the Company at a price of $0.05 per share.
As of April 30, 2015, we had a convertible note payable to a non-related party in the amount of $141,150, bearing no interest. The note is convertible into common stock of the Company at a price of $0.10 per share.
As of April 30, 2015, we had a convertible note payable to a non-related party in the amount of $14,500, bearing no interest. The note is convertible into common stock of the Company at a price of $0.10 per share.
As of April 30, 2015, we had a note payable to a non-related party of $9,000, which bears interest at an annual rate of 6%.
During the year ended April 30, 2015, we improved our financial position by issuing a total of 3,976,046 shares of our common stock for a reduction of debt totaling $367,274.
As of April 30, 2015, we had two convertible notes payable to institutional investors totaling $54,000, which bear interest at an annual rate of 8% per annum and mature in September and December 2015. The investors have the right, after the first 180 days of each respective note, to convert the note and accrued interest in whole or in part into shares of the common stock of the Company at a price per share equal to 58% (representing a discount rate of 42%) of the average of the lowest three trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten trading day period ending one trading day prior to the date of the conversion notice. At any time for the period beginning on the date of the note and ending on the date which is 30 days following the date of the note, the Company may prepay the note upon payment of an amount equal to the outstanding principal multiplied by 120%, together with accrued and unpaid interest. The amount of the prepayment increases every subsequent 30 days to 125%, 130%, 135%, 140% and 145% of the outstanding principal together with accrued and unpaid interest. After the expiration of 180 days following the date of the note, the Company will have no right of prepayment.
We have determined the conversion feature of the convertible promissory notes with the institutional investors is a derivative and have estimated its value as a derivative liability of $47,808 at April 30, 2015.
23
As discussed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, there is currently a limited market value for our common stock. Accordingly, no beneficial conversion feature or derivative liabilities, except for the conversion feature of the convertible promissory notes with the institutional investors, are determinable or have been recognized related to our convertible notes payable. These convertible features will be evaluated in subsequent periods for fair value determination.
During the year ended April 30, 2015, we used net cash in operating activities of $70,263, as a result of our net loss of $516,402, non-cash gains totaling $42,885 and a decrease in prepaid expenses of $1,848, partially offset by non-cash expenses totaling $292,941 and increases in accounts payable of $42,132, accrued interest payable of $1,288, accrued interest payable – related parties of $10,238 and payables – related parties of $144,273.
During the year ended April 30, 2014, we used net cash in operating activities of $135,107, as a result of our net loss of $364,741, non-cash gain of $26,000 and decrease in prepaid expenses of $1,910, partially offset by non-cash expenses totaling $57,518, and increases in accounts payable of $48,800, accrued interest payable of $2,613, accrued interest payable – related parties of $4,506 and payables – related parties of $144,107.
During the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, we had no cash provided by or used in investing activities.
During the year ended April 30, 2015, net cash provided by financing activities was $70,050, comprised of proceeds from convertible notes payable of $68,500 and proceeds from convertible notes payable – related parties of $53,900, partially offset by payments of $30,500 and payments on convertible notes payable – related parties of $21,850.
During the year ended April 30, 2014, net cash provided by financing activities was $135,000, comprised of proceeds from notes payable – related parties of $47,500 and proceeds from convertible note payable of $87,500.
We have not realized any revenues since inception and paid expenses and costs with proceeds from the issuance of securities as well as by loans from directors and other stockholders.
We believe a related party will provide sufficient funds to carry on general operations for the next three months. We expect that we will need to raise additional funds, most likely from the sale of securities or from stockholder loans, to be able to execute phase two of our exploration program. We may not be successful in our efforts to obtain equity financing to carry out our business plan and there is doubt regarding our ability to complete our planned exploration program.
As of April 30, 2015, we did not have sufficient cash to fund our operations for the next twelve months.
Inflation
In the opinion of management, inflation has not and will not have a material effect on our operations until such time as we successfully complete an acquisition or merger. At that time, management will evaluate the possible effects of inflation related to our business and operations following a successful acquisition or merger.
Net Operating Loss
We have accumulated a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $1,579,200 as of April 30, 2015. This loss carry forward may be offset against future taxable income through the year 2036. The use of these losses to reduce future income taxes will depend on the generation of sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of the net operating loss carryforwards. In the event of certain changes in control, there will be an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that can be used. No tax benefit has been reported in the financial statements for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 because it has been fully offset by a valuation reserve. The use of future tax benefit is undeterminable because we presently have no operations.
24
Due to the change in ownership provisions of U.S. federal and Canada and British Columbia income tax laws, operating loss carryforwards are potentially subject to annual limitations. As a result of the change in ownership of Canyon Gold Corp., $1,502,000 of net operating loss carryforwards have been deemed to have been forfeited. The net operating loss balance above reflects the forfeiture of this carryforward.
Critical Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Basic and Diluted Loss per Common Share
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. There are no such common stock equivalents outstanding for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014.
Dividends
The Company has not adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends. No dividends have been paid during any of the periods shown.
Comprehensive Income
The Company has no component of other comprehensive income. Accordingly, net income equals comprehensive loss for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2014 and 2013.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.
Income Taxes
The Company provides for income taxes under ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. ASC 740 requires the use of an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and the tax rates in effect when these differences are expected to reverse. The Company’s predecessor operated as entity exempt from Federal and State income taxes.
ASC 740 requires the reduction of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the total of the future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.
25
Accounting Basis
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company has adopted an April 30 fiscal year end.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from the sale of products will be recorded when the product is shipped, title and risk of loss have transferred to the purchaser, payment terms are fixed or determinable and payment is reasonably assured. Revenues from service contracts will be recognized when performance of the service is complete or over the term of the contract.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 9 to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of accounting pronouncements issued during the year ended April 30, 2015 and through the date of the filing of this annual report that we believe may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.
This item is not required for a smaller reporting company.
Financial statements for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 have been examined to the extent indicated in their reports by HJ & Associates, LLC, independent certified public accountants, and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and pursuant to regulations promulgated by the SEC. The aforementioned financial statements are included herein under Item 15.
This item is not applicable.
Evaluation of Disclosures and Procedures
Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-d-15(e), as of April 30, 2015. Based upon that evaluation, it was concluded that as of April 30, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our intent is to design this system to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
26
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management has concluded that there has been no significant change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2015 that could materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Not applicable.
Our executive officers and directors are as follows:
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
Stephen M. Studdert
|
65
|
President, CEO, Secretary, Interim CFO
and Director
|
On May 21, 2014, Stephen M. Studdert resigned as a director, President and CEO. He was replaced as President and CEO by Delbert Blewett, an incumbent director. Mr. Studdert remained as the President and Director of our wholly owned subsidiary, Long Canyon. On August 21, 2014, Alexander S. Romanchuk was appointed as a new director. In October 2014, Delbert Blewett passed away and was replaced as a director, President and CEO by Stephen Studdert. We presently anticipate that we will consider new, qualified persons to become directors in the future, although no new appointments or arrangements have been made as of the date hereof.
All directors serve for a one-year term until their successors are elected or they are re-elected at the annual stockholders' meeting. Officers hold their positions at the pleasure of the board of directors, absent any employment agreement, of which none currently exists or is contemplated.
There is no arrangement, agreement or understanding between any of the directors or officers and any other person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a director or officer. Also, there is no arrangement, agreement or understanding between management and non-management stockholders under which non-management stockholders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs.
The business experience of each of the persons listed above during the past five years is as follows:
Stephen M. Studdert
was appointed as a director on December 16, 2012 and served as President and CEO from October 16, 2013 to May 21, 2014. At that time he resigned as a director, President and CEO and was appointed as President and CEO of our subsidiary, Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp. Mr. Studdert was re-appointed as a director and named President and CEO on October 12, 2014, filling the vacancy created by the passing of Delbert G. Blewett. Mr. Studdert is founder and chairman of Studdert International, Mantford Ventures, and i3 Technologies. He also founded a commercial bank and has served on many corporate boards of directors. Mr. Studdert served as a White House advisor to U.S. Presidents George Bush, Ronald Reagan, and Gerald Ford, and represented U.S. Presidents in diplomatic assignments to over one hundred nations. By presidential appointment, he served on the President’s Export Council, the Export Advisory Now Council, and the Foreign Trade Practices and Negotiations Subcommittee, and as a United States Delegate to the United Nations Energy Conference in Africa. He also served as a United States Delegate to the 40th NATO Summit and was appointed Federal Home Loan Bank Director in the Clinton Administration. Mr. Studdert is a graduate of Brigham Young University.
27
Alexander S. Romanchuk became a director on August 21 2014. Mr. Romanchuk
served as
a member
on the Advisory Board of Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp., the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary,
with gold claims in Elko County, Nevada. Mr. Romanchuk holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Saskatchewan and engaged in the private practice of law in the Province of Alberta and British Columbia. Mr. Romanchuk has also served as an alderman then Mayor of Grande Prairie, Alberta. In later years he acted as Vice President of AltaRose Construction Ltd. managing the in house sales and all conveyancing. Mr. Romanchuk resigned voluntarily from the Board on December 28, 2014 due to health issues.
None of our officers, directors or control persons has had any of the following events occur:
|
●
|
any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
|
|
●
|
any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses;
|
|
●
|
being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not substantially reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking business; and
|
|
●
|
being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action, the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
|
Key Personnel
We have engaged the services of Development Resources LLC of American Fork, Utah to oversee our exploration program. DRLLC has an experienced geologists team living in the area, which can perform all of the exploration required including providing a qualified geology report and has a standing assay account with Chemex ASL labs in Elko, Nevada.
We have established an advisory board and Alex Burton has consented to join the board. Mr. Burton is a graduate geologist with a B.A. degree from the University of B.C. in 1954. He is registered as both a Professional Engineer and Registered Professional Geologist in British Columbia. Mr. Burton has served on the B.C. Yukon Chamber of Mines (n.k.a. Association for Mining Exploration) and for over 20 years taught their Placer Mining Course in association with the British Columbia Institute of Technology. Since 1954, Mr. Burton has had experience in various aspects of mine exploration, development and mine production, project scheduling, personnel assignment, field work, environmental auditing and reporting. Mr. Burton was the consulting geologist for DRLLC’s preliminary geology report on our properties and also conducted additional fieldwork from May 19 to May 29, 2012 as part of the requirements for dissemination of the final geology report.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We currently have the following committees:
|
Management Team:
|
Chairman Strategy Committee ‘LCGRC’: Stephen M. Studdert
|
|
Chief Financial Officer: Stephen M. Studdert (Interim CFO)
|
|
|
Chairman Explorations Committee: Alexander Burton
|
|
|
Professional Advisory Board:
|
Exploration Geologist/Geochemist: Alexander Burton
|
|
Exploration & Development:
|
Chairman Explorations Committee: Alexander Burton,
|
|
Development Resources LLC, American Fork, Utah (DRLLC)
|
No director is deemed to be an independent director. Our board of directors performs some of the functions associated with a nominating committee and a compensation committee, including reviewing all forms of compensation provided to our executive officers, directors, consultants and employees, including stock compensation. The board will also perform the functions of an audit committee until we establish a formal committee.
28
Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. We believe that no reports were filed during the fiscal year fiscal 2015.
Code of Ethics
We currently do not have a code of ethics. During the current fiscal year, we do intend to adopt a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions
We do not have a bonus, profit sharing, or deferred compensation plan for the benefit of employees, officers or directors. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014, we paid $10,000, $4,750 and $78,958, respectively, in cash or stock to Delbert Blewett to serve as our current President, CEO and sole director and to reimburse him for rent. Total accrued payable to Mr. Blewett for unpaid officer and director compensation and rent reimbursement as of April 30, 2014 is $55,792. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, we paid $7,500 to Harold Schneider to serve as our Principal Financial Officer and President of our subsidiary, Long Canyon. No payments were made in 2013. We paid Mr. Schneider $35,000 in stock during fiscal year 2014. Total accrued payable to Mr. Schneider as of April 30, 2014 is $47,500. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2014, we paid Mr. Studdert $50,000 in stock. Total accrued payable to Mr. Studdert as of April 30, 2014 is $15,000. We currently have no employees and do not pay any salaries.
The following table depicts compensation accrued to officers and directors for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
|
Name and Principal Position
|
Year Ended
April 30,
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
All Other
Consideration
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
Stephen M. Studdert, President,
|
2013
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 50,000 | ||||||||
| CEO, Secretary, Interim CFO | 2014 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 15,000 | $ | 15,000 | ||||||||
| and Director (1) | 2015 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | ||||||||
|
Delbert G. Blewett, former President,
|
2013
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 108,000 | $ | 108,000 | ||||||||
| CEO, Secretary, Interim CFO | 2014 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 31,500 | $ | 31,500 | ||||||||
| and Director (2) | 2015 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 15,000 | $ | 15,000 | ||||||||
(1) Mr. Studdert’s compensation for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2013 includes $50,000 for service as a director, which was paid in common stock of the Company. Mr. Studdert’s compensation for fiscal years ended April 30, 2014 and 2015 includes $15,000 and $30,000, respectively, for services as President and CEO. All services in 2014 and 2015 were accrued as a payable to Mr. Studdert, of which $25,000 was paid in common stock of the Company, leaving a balance payable to Mr. Studdert of $20,000 as of April 30, 2015.
(2) Mr. Blewett’s compensation for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2013 includes $30,000 for service as President and CEO, $75,000 for services as a director, and $3,000 for rent. Mr. Blewett’s compensation for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2014 includes $30,000 for service as a director and $1,500 for rent. Mr. Schneider’s compensation for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2015 includes $15,000 to serve as our President and CEO. Of the services payable to Mr. Blewett, $50,000 were paid in common stock of the Company in fiscal 2015, leaving a balance payable to the estate of Mr. Blewett of $20,792 as of April 30, 2015. Mr. Blewett passed away in October 2014.
During each of the fiscal years ended April 30, 2014 and 2015, we accrued accounts payable for services rendered by EMAC in the amount of $60,000. Total accrued payable to EMAC for services and expense reimbursement as of April 30, 2015 was $281,051.
29
The following table sets forth certain information as of July 29, 2015 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock and based on 21,049,691 shares outstanding:
|
●
|
Each stockholder believed to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;
|
|
●
|
by each of our directors and executive officers; and
|
|
●
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
For purposes of the following table, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of any shares of common stock (i) over which the person has or shares, directly or indirectly, voting or investment power, or (ii) of which the person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days after the date of this report. “Voting power” is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares and “investment power” includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares.
| Name and Address |
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
|
Percent
|
||||||
|
Ownership
|
of Class
|
|||||||
| Directors and Executive Officers : | ||||||||
|
Stephen M. Studdert, President & CEO
4730 S. Fort Apache Road, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89147
|
275,000 | 1.31 | % | |||||
|
5% Beneficial Owners
|
||||||||
|
Reinhard Hiestand
Schuetzenstr. 22, Pfaeffikon/Switzerland
|
12,066,750 | (3) | 57.33 | % | ||||
|
Ernst Hiestand
Churerstrasse 52, 8808 Pfaeffikon/Switzerland
|
1,705,080 | 8.10 | % | |||||
| All directors and executive officers as a group (1 person) | 275,000 | 1.3 | % |
|
|
(1)
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the named person will be the record and beneficial owner of the shares indicated.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Percentage ownership is based on 21,049,691 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 29, 2015.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes 12,006,750 shares held in the name of EMAC Handels AG that is owned and controlled by Reinhard Hiestand. The remaining 60,000 shares are held in the name of Mr. Hiestand.
|
30
Except as set forth below, we have not entered into any other material transactions with any officer, director, nominee for election as director, or any stockholder owning greater than five percent (5%) of our outstanding shares, nor any member of the above referenced individuals' immediate family.
On May 4, 2014, the Company issued 1,507,080 shares of its common stock to EMAC Handels AG (“EMAC”), a principal stockholder, in the conversion of a $101,000 convertible note payable and accrued interest payable related party of $49,708.
On May 4, 2014, the Company issued 600,000 shares of its common stock to Velania Treuhand AG, a principal stockholder, in the conversion of a $30,000 convertible note payable.
On May 15, 2011, Long Canyon entered into an option agreement with EMAC. EMAC owned and controlled a 100% interest in 275 mineral lease claims situated on approximately 6,250 acres of mineral lease properties adjoining the 640 acres owned by Long Canyon. EMAC initially acquired these claims from DRLLC. The option agreement allowed Long Canyon to earn a 100% interest in the 6,250 acres for the exercise price of $900,000 cash. The agreement also provided to EMAC a 2% Net Smelter Royalty on the 275 claims subject to the option agreement. On May 31, 2014 pursuant to an extension of the option agreement, the exercise period of the option agreement was extended to December 31, 2014.
On April 7, 2014, the Company, on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiary, Long Canyon, executed an agreement with EMAC, to acquire a 100% interest in 180 mineral lease claims in the Long Canyon Trend area of Elko, County, Nevada. The Company issued 12,000,000 restricted shares of its common stock to EMAC valued at $240,000, the historical cost basis of the mineral properties to EMAC. This amount was recorded as mineral claims, a non-current asset in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Canyon Gold and EMAC were unable to make the required annual mineral lease payments due in September 2014 to maintain the 275 optioned claims and the 180 purchased claims. Therefore, these mineral interests were not renewed and the $240,000 cost basis of the 180 mineral lease claims was expensed as abandoned mineral claims in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended April 30, 2015.
Management and administrative services are compensated as per a Service Agreement between the Company and Stephen Studdert, its Chief Executive Officer, executed on April 30, 2011, a Service Agreement between the Company and Delbert Blewett, its former Chief Executive Officer, executed on December 6, 2012, and an Administration Agreement with EMAC executed on March 15, 2011 (and subsequently renewed on May 1, 2014), whereby the fee is based on services provided and invoiced by related parties on a monthly basis and the fees are paid in cash when possible or with common stock. The Company also, from time to time, has some of its expenses paid by related parties with the intent to repay. These types of transactions, when incurred, result in payables to related parties in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a necessary part of funding the Company’s operations.
As of April 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had the following payable balances due to related parties:
|
Related Party
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||
|
EMAC
|
$ | 290,886 | $ | 266,613 | ||||
|
Stephen Studdert, President & CEO
|
20,000 | 15,000 | ||||||
|
Delbert Blewett, Former President & CEO
|
20,792 | 55,792 | ||||||
|
Harold Schneider, Former CFO
|
32,500 | 47,500 | ||||||
|
Alexander Burton, Advisory Board
|
5,000 | 15,000 | ||||||
| $ | 369,178 | $ | 399,905 | |||||
31
Convertible notes payable – related parties consisted of the following at April 30, 2015:
|
Note payable to EMAC, no interest, convertible
into common stock of the Company at $0.10 per
share, imputed interest at 9% per annum
|
$ | 25,000 | ||
|
Note payable to Velania Treuhand AG, interest at 6%,
convertible into common stock of the Company at
$0.10 per share
|
32,050 | |||
| $ | 57,050 |
None of our directors are deemed to be independent directors. We do not have a compensation, audit or nominating committee, rather those functions are carried out by the board as a whole.
We do not have an audit committee and as a result our entire board of directors performs the duties of an audit committee. Our board of directors will approve in advance the scope and cost of the engagement of an auditor before the auditor renders audit and non-audit services. As a result, we do not rely on pre-approval policies and procedures.
Audit Fees
Our auditors, HJ & Associates, LLC, billed us $40,000 and $42,000 for (i) services related to the audit of our annual financial statements included in this annual report for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and (ii) quarterly reviews performed during the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Audit Related Fees
For the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, there were no fees billed for assurance and related services by our current auditors HJ & Associates, LLC relating to the performance of the audit of our financial statements which are not reported under the caption "Audit Fees" above.
Tax Fees
For the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, no fees were billed by our current auditors HJ & Associates, LLC for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
All Other fees
For the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, no fees were billed by our current auditors HJ & Associates, LLC for other SEC services.
We do not use HJ & Associates, LLC for financial information system design and implementation. These services, which include designing or implementing a system that aggregates source data underlying the financial statements or generates information that is significant to our financial statements, are provided internally or by other service providers. We do not engage HJ & Associates, LLC to provide compliance outsourcing services.
The board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by HJ & Associates, LLC and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining HJ & Associates, LLC’s’ independence.
32
|
|
(a)
|
Exhibits
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
Exhibit Name |
|
2.1
(2)
|
Agreement for Acquisition of Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp.
|
|
3.1
(2)
|
Articles of Incorporation and amendments thereto
|
|
3.2
(1)
|
Bylaws
|
|
4.1
(2)
|
Instrument defining security holder rights
|
|
10.1
(5)
|
Agreement between Development Resources LLC (DRLLC) and Ferguson Holdings Ltd. (now known as Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp.) – This agreement is the attachment referred to in the agreement included as Exhibit 10.2 |
|
10.2
(1)
|
Agreement between Ferguson Holdings Ltd. (now known as Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp.) and August Energy Corp. (now known as Canyon Gold Corp.) |
|
10.3
(2)
|
Option Agreement between EMAC Handels AG and Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp.
|
|
10.4
(3)
|
Extension Agreement to Option Agreement
|
|
10.5
(4)
|
Service Agreement with Delbert G. Blewett
|
|
10.6
(4)
|
Administration Agreement with EMAC Handels AG
|
|
10.7
(4)
|
Settlement Agreement with EMAC Handels AG
|
|
10.8
(4)
|
Service Agreement with Harold Schneider
|
|
10.9
(6)
|
Definite Agreement with EMAC Handels AG
|
|
10.10
(7)
|
Definite Agreement to acquire Marshall Thomsen Ltd.
|
|
21.1
(1)
|
Subsidiaries
|
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
101 INS
|
XBRL Instance Document*
|
|
101 SCH
|
XBRL Schema Document*
|
|
101 CAL
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document*
|
|
101 DEF
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document*
|
|
101 LAB
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document*
|
|
101 PRE
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document*
|
* The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.
| (1) | Filed as exhibit to Form S-1 filed on November 10, 2011. |
| (2) | Filed as exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 filed on March 12, 2012. |
| (3) | Filed as exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 filed on April 23, 2012. |
|
(4)
|
Filed as exhibit to Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1 filed on August 17, 2012.
|
|
(5)
|
Filed as exhibit to Amendment No. 7 to Form S-1 filed on October 17, 2012.
|
|
(6)
|
Filed as exhibit to Form 8-K filed on April 10, 2014.
|
|
(7)
|
Filed as exhibit to Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2014
|
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
Canyon Gold Corp.
|
|
|
By:
/S/
Stephen M. Studdert
|
|
|
|
Stephen M. Studdert
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
| Acting Chief Financial Officer | |
|
Dated: July 29, 2015
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
/S/
Stephen M. Studdert
|
Director
|
July 29, 2015
|
|
Stephen M. Studdert
|
34
Canyon Gold Corp.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended April 30, 2015 and 2014
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 30, 2015 and 2014
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended April 30, 2015 and 2014
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended April 30, 2015 and 2014
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended April 30, 2015 and 2014
|
F-6
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-7
|
F - 1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors
Canyon Gold Corp. and Subsidiary
Las Vegas, Nevada
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Canyon Gold Corp. and Subsidiary as of April 30, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Canyon Gold Corp. and Subsidiary as of April 30, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered significant recurring losses which have resulted in an accumulated deficit. This raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ HJ & Associates, LLC
HJ & Associates, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
July 29, 2015
F - 2
|
Canyon Gold Corp.
|
|
|
|
April 30,
|
||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash
|
$ | 183 | $ | 396 | ||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
5,858 | 4,010 | ||||||
|
Total current assets
|
6,041 | 4,406 | ||||||
|
Mineral claims
|
37,820 | 277,820 | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 43,861 | $ | 282,226 | ||||
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
$ | 109,499 | $ | 99,567 | ||||
|
Accrued interest payable
|
2,383 | 3,501 | ||||||
|
Accrued interest payable – related parties
|
11,143 | 50,613 | ||||||
|
Derivative liability
|
47,808 | 63,359 | ||||||
|
Convertible notes payable, net of discount
|
199,748 | 322,779 | ||||||
|
Convertible notes payable – related parties, net of discount
|
57,050 | 156,000 | ||||||
|
Notes payable – related parties
|
79,656 | 79,656 | ||||||
|
Payables – related parties
|
369,178 | 399,905 | ||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
876,465 | 1,175,380 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
876,465 | 1,175,380 | ||||||
|
Stockholders’ deficit:
|
||||||||
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized, 1,100,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
110 | 110 | ||||||
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized,
20,867,943 and 14,491,896 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
2,087 | 1,450 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
952,475 | 408,360 | ||||||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(1,787,276 | ) | (1,303,074 | ) | ||||
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
(832,604 | ) | (893,154 | ) | ||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
$ | 43,861 | $ | 282,226 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
F - 3
|
Canyon Gold Corp.
|
|
|
|
Years Ended April 30,
|
||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||
|
General and administrative
|
45,945 | 125,272 | ||||||
|
Management and administrative fees
|
90,000 | 75,000 | ||||||
|
Professional fees
|
53,799 | 79,472 | ||||||
|
Directors’ fees
|
15,000 | 30,000 | ||||||
|
Exploration costs
|
8,800 | 14,000 | ||||||
|
Abandoned mineral claims
|
240,000 | - | ||||||
|
Total expenses
|
453,544 | 323,744 | ||||||
|
Loss from operations
|
(453,544 | ) | (323,744 | ) | ||||
|
Other income (expense):
|
||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(73,543 | ) | (46,138 | ) | ||||
|
Gain (loss) on derivative liability
|
23,188 | (20,859 | ) | |||||
|
Gain on settlement of debt
|
19,697 | 26,000 | ||||||
|
Total other income (expense)
|
(30,658 | ) | (40,997 | ) | ||||
|
Loss before income taxes
|
(484,202 | ) | (364,741 | ) | ||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (484,202 | ) | $ | (364,741 | ) | ||
|
Net loss per common share – basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | ||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding -
|
||||||||
|
basic and diluted
|
20,733,637 | 2,233,608 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
F - 4
|
Canyon Gold Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit
For the Years Ended April 30, 2015 and 2014
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Stock
|
Preferred Stock
|
Stockholders’
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, April 30, 2013
|
1,405,896 | $ | 141 | 1,100,000 | $ | 110 | $ | (75,371 | ) | $ | (938,333 | ) | $ | (1,013,453 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Common stock issued for
services at $2.00 per share
|
1,000 | - | - | - | 2,000 | - | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common stock issued for
payables – related parties
at $2.00 per share
|
85,000 | 9 | - | - | 169,991 | - | 170,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common stock issued to a related
party for mineral claims at $0.02
per share
|
12,000,000 | 1,200 | - | - | 238,800 | - | 240,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common stock issued at $0.05
per share for payment of
$50,000 of payables – related
parties assigned to third party
|
1,000,000 | 100 | - | - | 49,900 | - | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Imputed interest on convertible
notes payable
|
- | - | - | - | 23,040 | - | 23,040 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss for the year ended
April 30, 2014
|
- | - | - | - | - | (364,741 | ) | (364,741 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, April 30, 2014
|
14,491,896 | 1,450 | 1,100,000 | 110 | 408,360 | (1,303,074 | ) | (893,154 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Common stock issued for
payables – related parties
at $0.07 per share
|
2,400,000 | 240 | - | - | 174,760 | - | 175,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common stock issued for
conversion of debt at $0.10
per share
|
1,868,966 | 187 | - | - | 186,379 | - | 186,566 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common stock issued for
conversion of related party debt
at $0.09 per share
|
2,107,080 | 210 | - | - | 180,498 | - | 180,708 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adjustment to common shares
outstanding
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Imputed interest on convertible
notes payable
|
- | - | - | - | 2,478 | - | 2,478 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss for the year ended
April 30, 2015
|
- | - | - | - | - | (484,202 | ) | (484,202 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, April 30, 2015
|
20,867,943 | $ | 2,087 | 1,100,000 | $ | 110 | $ | 952,475 | $ | (1,787,276 | ) | $ | (832,604 | ) | ||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
F - 5
|
Canyon Gold Corp.
|
|
|
|
Years Ended April 30,
|
||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (484,202 | ) | $ | (364,741 | ) | ||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Abandoned mineral claims
|
240,000 | - | ||||||
|
Imputed interest on convertible notes payable
|
2,478 | 23,040 | ||||||
|
Amortization of debt discount to interest expense
|
50,463 | 11,619 | ||||||
|
(Gain) loss on derivative liability
|
(23,188 | ) | 20,859 | |||||
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
(19,697 | ) | (26,000 | ) | ||||
|
Common stock issued for services
|
- | 2,000 | ||||||
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses
|
(1,848 | ) | (1,910 | ) | ||||
|
Increase in accounts payable
|
9,932 | 48,800 | ||||||
|
Increase in accrued interest payable
|
1,288 | 2,613 | ||||||
|
Increase in accrued interest payable – related parties
|
10,238 | 4,506 | ||||||
|
Increase in payables – related parties
|
144,273 | 144,107 | ||||||
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(70,263 | ) | (135,107 | ) | ||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Proceeds from convertible notes payable
|
68,500 | 87,500 | ||||||
|
Proceeds from convertible notes payable – related parties
|
53,900 | - | ||||||
|
Proceeds from notes payable – related parties
|
- | 47,500 | ||||||
|
Payments on convertible notes payable
|
(30,500 | ) | - | |||||
|
Payments on convertible notes payable – related parties
|
(21,850 | ) | - | |||||
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
70,050 | 135,000 | ||||||
|
Net decrease in cash
|
(213 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||
|
Cash at beginning of the year
|
396 | 503 | ||||||
|
Cash at end of the year
|
$ | 183 | $ | 396 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
F - 6
Canyon Gold Corp.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended April 30, 2015 and 2014
1. Nature of Operations and Continuation of Business
Canyon Gold Corp. (the "Company ") was incorporated in the State of Delaware on May 27, 1998 as Mayne International Ltd. On September 5, 2000, the Company changed its name to Black Dragon Entertainment, Inc. On July 31, 2002, the Company changed its name to Vita Biotech Corporation. On May 27, 2004, the Company changed its name to August Energy Corp. and subsequently on April 17, 2011, the Company changed its name to Canyon Gold Corp.
On July 20, 2011, the Company acquired 100% of the issued shares of Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp. (“Long Canyon”), a private British Columbia, Canada Corporation, incorporated on June 19, 2008, in a share for share exchange for a total of 27,998,699 common shares and 500,000 Series B preferred shares to be issued by the Company to the shareholders of Long Canyon. The Share Exchange was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization and as a result, the consolidated financial statements of the Company (the legal acquirer) are, in substance, those of Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp. (the accounting acquirer), with the assets and liabilities, and revenue and expenses, of the Company being included effective from the date of the Share Exchange. As the Share Exchange was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization, there was no gain or loss recognized on the transaction. The historical financial statements for periods prior to the Share Exchange are those of Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp. except that the equity section and earnings per share have been retroactively restated to reflect the Share Exchange. As a result of the Share Exchange, the Company continues its’ mineral exploration activities.
Going Concern
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern. Through April 30, 2015, the Company has no revenues, has accumulated losses of $1,787,276 since inception on June 19, 2008 and a working capital deficit of $870,424 and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which cast substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management plans to continue to provide for the Company's capital needs during the year ending April 30, 2016 by issuing debt and equity securities and by the continued support of its related parties (see Note 4). The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence. There is no assurance that funding will be available to continue the Company’s business operations.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Basis of Presentation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Company’s fiscal year end is April 30. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp. (“Long Canyon”). All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.
(b) Exploration Costs
All exploration costs, including sampling, metallurgical, engineering, contractor costs, and efforts to obtain mineral rights have been charged to expense as incurred.
(c) Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260,
Earnings per Share
, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted loss per share (“EPS”) on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including stock options, using the treasury stock method, convertible preferred stock, and convertible debt, using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all potentially dilutive common shares if their effect is antidilutive. As of April 30, 2015, convertible debt and related accrued interest payable were convertible into approximately 4,637,000 common shares of the Company.
Since we had no dilutive effect of stock options, warrants or convertible debt for the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding is the same as our diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
F - 7
(d) Revenue Recognition
Revenues from the sale of products will be recorded when the product is shipped, title and risk of loss have transferred to the purchaser, payment terms are fixed or determinable and payment is reasonably assured. Revenues from service contracts will be recognized when performance of the service is complete or over the term of the contract.
(e) Foreign Currency Translation
The Company’s financial instruments and reporting currency is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated in accordance with ASC 830,
Foreign Currency Translation Matters
, using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of net income.
(f) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC 740,
Income Taxes
. The asset and liability method provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized.
(g) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
(h) Financial Instruments
Pursuant to ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
and ASC 825,
Financial Instruments,
an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value using a hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence when measuring fair value using a hierarch based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization with the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy prioritized the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
F - 8
Level 1
Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2
Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3
Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
As of April 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company believes the amounts reported for cash, payables, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties approximate their fair values due to the nature or duration of these instruments. In addition, the fair value of certain of the Company’s convertible notes was not determinable since there has been no current market value for the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, no beneficial conversion feature or derivative liabilities were determinable or have been recognized related to these convertible notes payable.
Convertible notes payable to an institutional investor and related derivative liability are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and estimated as follows at April 30, 2015 and 2014:
|
2015
|
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||
|
Derivative liability
|
$ | 47,808 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 47,808 | ||||||||
|
Convertible notes payable
|
54,000 | - | - | 54,000 | ||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities measured at
fair value
|
$ | 101,808 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 101,808 | ||||||||
|
2014
|
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||
|
Derivative liability
|
$ | 63,359 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 63,359 | ||||||||
|
Convertible notes payable
|
42,500 | - | - | 42,500 | ||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities measured at
fair value
|
$ | 105,859 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 105,859 | ||||||||
The Company’s accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of ASC 505,
Equity Based Payments to Non Employees
. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete.
(i) Non-Monetary Transactions
All issuances of the Company’s common stock for non-cash consideration have been assigned a dollar amount equaling either the market value of the shares issued or the value of consideration received whichever is more readily determinable. The majority of the non-cash consideration received pertains to services rendered by consultants and others and has been valued at the market value of the shares issued.
The Company’s accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of ASC 505,
Equity Based Payments to Non Employees
. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete.
In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.
F - 9
(j) Comprehensive Loss
ASC 220,
Comprehensive Income,
establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at April 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company has no items that represent comprehensive income or loss and, therefore, net loss for these periods is the same as comprehensive loss.
(k) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all investments purchased with original maturity of three or fewer months to be cash equivalents.
3. Mineral Claims
On March 12, 2011, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Long Canyon, acquired a 100% interest in 30 mineral claims located in the State of Nevada for $37,820. This amount has been recorded as mineral claims, a non-current asset in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.
On March 19, 2011, the Company acquired a 100% interest in 15 of the mineral claims acquired by Long Canyon for $17,830 consisting of $17,770 in cash and a payable of $60. On July 22, 2011, that payable was satisfied with the issuance of 600,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at $0.0001 per share issued to a related party of Long Canyon.
In August 2013, the Company paid $6,600 for government and claim fees relating to the 30 mineral claims owned by the Company for the twelve months beginning September 1, 2013, $2,200 of which were recognized as prepaid expenses as of April 30, 2014.
In August 2014, the Company incurred costs of $6,600 for government and claim fees relating to the 30 mineral claims owned by the Company for the twelve months beginning September 1, 2014, $2,200 of which were recognized as prepaid expenses as of April 30, 2015.
On May 15, 2011, Long Canyon entered into an option agreement with EMAC Handels AG (“EMAC”) of Pfaeffikon, Switzerland, a related party. EMAC owned and controlled a 100% interest in 275 mineral lease claims situated on approximately 6,250 acres of mineral lease properties adjoining the 640 acres owned by Long Canyon. EMAC initially acquired these claims from DRLLC. The option agreement allowed Long Canyon to earn a 100% interest in the 6,250 acres for the exercise price of $900,000 cash. The agreement also provided to EMAC a 2% Net Smelter Royalty on the 275 claims subject to the option agreement. On May 31, 2014 pursuant to an extension of the option agreement, the exercise period of the option agreement was extended to December 31, 2014.
On April 7, 2014, the Company, on behalf of its wholly owned subsidiary, Long Canyon, executed an agreement with EMAC, the majority shareholder of the Company at the date of the agreement and a related party, to acquire a 100% interest in 180 mineral lease claims in the Long Canyon Trend area of Elko, County, Nevada. The Company issued 12,000,000 restricted shares of its common stock to EMAC valued at $240,000, the historical cost basis of the mineral properties to EMAC. This amount was recorded as mineral claims, a non-current asset in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Canyon Gold and EMAC were unable to make the required annual mineral lease payments due in September 2014 to maintain the 275 optioned claims and the 180 purchased claims. Therefore, these mineral interests were not renewed and the $240,000 cost basis of the 180 mineral lease claims was expensed as abandoned mineral claims in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended April 30, 2015.
F - 10
4. Related Party Transactions and Balances
Management and administrative services are compensated as per a Service Agreement between the Company and its Chief Executive Officer executed on April 30, 2011, a Service Agreement between the Company and its former Chief Executive Officer executed on December 6, 2012, and an Administration Agreement with a related party executed on March 15, 2011 and renewed on May 1, 2015, whereby the fee is based on services provided and invoiced by related parties on a monthly basis and the fees are paid in cash when possible or with common stock. The Company also, from time to time, has some of its expenses paid by related parties with the intent to repay. These types of transactions, when incurred, result in payables to related parties in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a necessary part of funding the Company’s operations.
As discussed in Note 3, in 2011 the Company entered into an agreement with a related party wherein the Company had the option to acquire 100% interest in an additional 275 mineral claims located in the same areas in Nevada as the mineral claims previously acquired. The option was cancelled during the year ended April 30, 2015.
See Note 3 for discussion of the acquisition of mineral claims from a related party.
As of April 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had payable balances due to related parties totaling $369,178 and $399,905, respectively, which resulted from transactions with significant shareholders.
Convertible notes payable – related parties consisted of the following at April 30:
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
|
Note payable to related party, no interest, convertible
into common stock of the Company at $0.10 per
share, imputed interest at 9% per annum
|
$ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||||
|
Note payable to related party, interest at 6%,
convertible into common stock of the Company at
$0.10 per share
|
32,050 | - | ||||||
|
Note payable to related party, no interest, convertible
into common stock of the Company at $0.10 per
share, imputed interest at 9% per annum
|
- | 101,000 | ||||||
|
Note payable to related party, no interest, convertible
into common stock of the Company at $0.10 per
share, imputed interest at 9% per annum
|
- | 30,000 | ||||||
| $ | 57,050 | $ | 156,000 | |||||
On May 4, 2014, the Company issued 1,507,080 shares of its common stock in the conversion of the $101,000 convertible note payable - related party and accrued interest payable – related party of $49,708.
On May 4, 2014, the Company issued 600,000 shares of its common stock in the conversion of the $30,000 convertible note payable – related party.
Convertible notes payable – related parties issued prior to the fiscal year ended April 30, 2014 were convertible 30 days from the first day the Company’s common shares are qualified for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, which occurred in November 2012. As of April 30, 2015, the convertible note payable – related party of $25,000 had not been converted and therefore is in default.
Historically, there has been no determinable and active market value for the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, no beneficial conversion feature or derivative liabilities were determinable or have been recognized related to the Company’s convertible notes payable – related parties. These convertible features will be evaluated in subsequent periods for fair value determination.
F - 11
Notes payable – related parties are currently in default and consisted of the following at April 30:
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
|
Note payable to related party, with interest at 6% per
annum, due September 15, 2013
|
$ | 24,656 | $ | 24,656 | ||||
|
Note payable to related party, with interest at 6% per
annum, due March 8, 2014
|
7,500 | 7,500 | ||||||
|
Note payable to related party, with interest at 6% per
annum, due December 5, 2013
|
47,500 | 47,500 | ||||||
| $ | 79,656 | $ | 79,656 | |||||
Accrued interest payable – related parties was $11,143 and $50,613 at April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
5. Convertible Notes Payable
Convertible notes payable consisted of the following at April 30:
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
|
Note payable, no interest, convertible into common
stock of the Company at $0.05 per share
|
$ | 11,000 | $ | 36,000 | ||||
|
Note payable, no interest, convertible into common
stock of the Company at $0.10 per share 90 days
from demand
|
141,150 | 141,150 | ||||||
|
Note payable, no interest, convertible into common
stock of the Company at $0.10 per share on a
quarterly basis
|
14,500 | - | ||||||
|
Note payable to institutional investor, with interest at
8% per annum, convertible into common stock of
the Company at defined conversion price, maturing
on September 5, 2015
|
38,000 | - | ||||||
|
Note payable to institutional investor, with interest at
8% per annum, convertible into common stock of
the Company at defined conversion price, maturing
on December 4, 2015
|
16,000 | - | ||||||
|
Note payable to institutional investor, with interest at
8% per annum, convertible into common stock of
the Company at defined conversion price
|
- | 42,500 | ||||||
|
Note payable, no interest, convertible into common
stock of the Company at $0.125 per share, imputed
interest at 9% per annum
|
- | 100,000 | ||||||
|
Note payable, with interest at 6% per annum,
convertible into common stock of the Company at
$0.05 per share
|
- | 25,010 | ||||||
|
Other, with interest at 6% per annum
|
9,000 | 9,000 | ||||||
|
Less discount
|
(29,902 | ) | (30,881 | ) | ||||
| $ | 199,748 | $ | 322,779 | |||||
The convertible notes payable with balances of $11,000 and $141,150 at April 30, 2015 were convertible 30 days from the first day the Company’s common shares are qualified for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, which occurred in November 2012. As of April 30, 2015, these convertible notes had not been converted and therefore were in default.
On May 4, 2014, the Company issued 800,000 shares of its common stock in the conversion of the $100,000 convertible note payable.
F - 12
On May 4, 2014, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock in the conversion of the $25,010 convertible note payable, $25,000 of the $36,000 convertible note payable, and $2,406 in accrued interest payable, recognizing a gain on settlement of debt of $2,416.
On February 13, 2014, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an institutional investor (“Investor”) for $42,500, which bears interest at an annual rate of 8% and matures on November 18, 2014. The Investor has the right, after the first 180 days of the note, to convert the note and accrued interest in whole or in part into shares of the common stock of the Company at a price per share equal to 58% (representing a discount rate of 42%) of the average of the lowest three trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten trading day period ending one trading day prior to the date of the conversion notice. At any time for the period beginning on the date of the note and ending on the date which is 30 days following the date of the note, the Company may prepay the note upon payment of an amount equal to the outstanding principal multiplied by 120%, together with accrued and unpaid interest. The amount of the prepayment increases every subsequent 30 days to 125%, 130%, 135%, 140% and 145% of the outstanding principal together with accrued and unpaid interest. After the expiration of 180 days following the date of the note, the Company will have no right of prepayment.
At the inception of the convertible note to institutional investor, the Company recorded debt issuance costs of $2,500 in prepaid expenses, a debt discount of $42,500 and a derivative liability of $52,962 related to the conversion feature. Interest expense for the amortization of the debt discount is calculated on a straight-line basis over the life of the convertible note.
On August 21, 2014, the Company issued 68,966 shares of its common stock in the conversion of $12,000 principal of the convertible note payable to institutional investor. The Company repaid the remaining principal balance of $30,500 in November 2014.
On December 3, 2014, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an institutional investor for $38,000, which bears interest at an annual rate of 8% and matures on September 5, 2015. The investor has the right, after the first 180 days of the note, to convert the note and accrued interest in whole or in part into shares of the common stock of the Company at a price per share equal to 58% (representing a discount rate of 42%) of the average of the lowest three trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten trading day period ending one trading day prior to the date of the conversion notice. At any time for the period beginning on the date of the note and ending on the date which is 30 days following the date of the note, the Company may prepay the note upon payment of an amount equal to the outstanding principal multiplied by 120%, together with accrued and unpaid interest. The amount of the prepayment increases every subsequent 30 days to 125%, 130%, 135%, 140% and 145% of the outstanding principal together with accrued and unpaid interest. After the expiration of 180 days following the date of the note, the Company will have no right of prepayment.
At the inception of the convertible note to institutional investor, the Company recorded debt issuance costs of $3,000 in prepaid expenses, and a debt discount and derivative liability of $37,325 related to the conversion feature. Interest expense for the amortization of the debt discount is calculated on a straight-line basis over the life of the convertible note.
On March 2, 2015, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an institutional investor for $16,000, which bears interest at an annual rate of 8% and matures on December 4, 2015. The investor has the right, after the first 180 days of the note, to convert the note and accrued interest in whole or in part into shares of the common stock of the Company at a price per share equal to 58% (representing a discount rate of 42%) of the average of the lowest three trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten trading day period ending one trading day prior to the date of the conversion notice. At any time for the period beginning on the date of the note and ending on the date which is 30 days following the date of the note, the Company may prepay the note upon payment of an amount equal to the outstanding principal multiplied by 120%, together with accrued and unpaid interest. The amount of the prepayment increases every subsequent 30 days to 125%, 130%, 135%, 140% and 145% of the outstanding principal together with accrued and unpaid interest. After the expiration of 180 days following the date of the note, the Company will have no right of prepayment.
At the inception of the convertible note to institutional investor, the Company recorded debt issuance costs of $500 in prepaid expenses, and a debt discount and derivative liability of $16,000 related to the conversion feature. Interest expense for the amortization of the debt discount is calculated on a straight-line basis over the life of the convertible note.
F - 13
During the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, we had the following activity in the accounts related to the convertible notes to institutional investor:
|
Derivative
Liability
|
Debt
Discount
|
Gain
(Loss) on
Derivative
Liability
|
||||||||||
|
Derivative liability at inception of the note
|
$ | 52,962 | $ | 42,500 | $ | (10,462 | ) | |||||
|
Loss on derivative liability
|
10,397 | - | (10,397 | ) | ||||||||
|
Amortization of debt discount to interest expense
|
- | (11,619 | ) | - | ||||||||
|
Balance at April 30, 2014
|
63,359 | 30,881 | $ | (20,859 | ) | |||||||
|
Issuance of convertible notes
|
83,393 | 53,326 | $ | (30,069 | ) | |||||||
|
Gain on derivative liability
|
(53,257 | ) | - | 53,257 | ||||||||
|
Conversion of debt to shares of common stock
and repayment of debt
|
(45,687 | ) | (3,842 | ) | ||||||||
|
Amortization of debt discount to interest expense
|
- | (50,463 | ) | - | ||||||||
|
Balance at April 30, 2015
|
$ | 47,808 | $ | 29,902 | $ | 23,188 | ||||||
The estimated fair value of the derivative liability at April 30, 2015 was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.06% - 0.15 | % | ||
|
Expected life in years
|
0.35 – 0.60 | |||
|
Dividend yield
|
0 | % | ||
|
Expected volatility
|
111.34% - 133.37 | % |
Accrued interest payable was $2,383 and $3,501 at April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
6. Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by the valuation allowances when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components at April 30:
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
$ | 615,900 | $ | 265,300 | ||||
|
Related party accrued interest
|
12,600 | 10,500 | ||||||
|
Accrued expenses – related parties
|
357,000 | 101,800 | ||||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(985,500 | ) | (377,600 | ) | ||||
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
F - 14
The income tax provision (benefit) differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying U.S. Federal, Canada corporate and British Columbia corporate income tax rates to pre-tax loss due to the following:
|
Year Ended April 30,
|
||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
|
Book loss
|
$ | (149,100 | ) | $ | (124,000 | ) | ||
|
Non deductible expenses
|
3,000 | 76,700 | ||||||
|
Related party accruals
|
3,400 | 16,000 | ||||||
|
Related party interest
|
8,100 | 1,500 | ||||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
134,600 | 29,800 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
At April 30, 2015, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $1,579,200 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2036. No tax benefit has been reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.
The Company has adopted the Income Tax topic of FASB ASC 740,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
. Included in the balance at April 30, 2015, are no tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is uncertain. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period.
The Company’s policy is to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.
Due to the change in ownership provisions of U.S. federal and Canada and British Columbia income tax laws, operating loss carryforwards are potentially subject to annual limitations. As a result of the change in ownership of Canyon Gold Corp., $1,502,000 of net operating loss carryforwards have been deemed to have been forfeit. The net operating loss balance above reflects the forfeiture of this carryforward.
7. Stockholders’ Deficit
Common Stock:
The Company has 200,000,000 shares of $0.0001par value common stock authorized. On February 20, 2014, a majority of the shareholders of the Company holding 82.95% of the Company’s voting stock approved a 20:1 reverse stock split. On March 3, 2014, a request was filed with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to approve the reverse split. FINRA approved the reverse split effective April 4, 2014. The reverse stock split has been given retroactive effect in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
During the year ended April 30, 2015, the Company issued a total of 6,376,047 shares of its common stock: 2,400,000 shares for payables – related parties of $175,000; 1,868,966 shares for conversion of debt of $186,566; 2,107,080 shares for conversion of related party debt of $180,708; and 1 share to adjust the number of common shares outstanding.
During the year ended April 30, 2014, the Company issued a total of 13,086,000 shares of its common stock: 1,000 shares for services of $2,000; 85,000 shares for payables – related parties of $170,000; 12,000,000 shares for mineral claims of $240,000 (valued at predecessor cost to a related party); and 1,000,000 shares for payables – related parties of $50,000 assigned to a third party.
F - 15
All issuances of the Company’s common stock for non-cash consideration have been assigned a dollar amount equaling either the market value of the shares issued or the value of consideration received whichever is more readily determinable. The majority of the non-cash consideration received pertaining to services rendered by consultants and others has been valued at the market value of the shares issued.
Preferred Stock
The Company has 20,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value preferred stock authorized.
During the year ended April 30, 2012, the Company issued 600,000 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock to a related party in payment of an outstanding debt. The Series A convertible preferred shares are convertible into ten common voting shares and carry voting rights on the basis of 100 votes per share with rights and preferences being decided by the Board of Directors of the Company.
During the year ended April 30, 2012, the Company issued 500,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock in the acquisition of Long Canyon (see Note 1). The Series B convertible preferred shares are convertible into ten common voting shares and carry no voting rights.
8. Contingencies and Commitments
(a) Litigation
From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm the Company. The Company is currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that the Company believes will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or operating results.
(b) Indemnities and Guarantees
During the normal course of business, the Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees under which it may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Nevada. These indemnities include certain agreements with the Company's officers under which the Company may be required to indemnify such person for liabilities arising out of their employment relationship. The duration of these indemnities and guarantees varies and, in certain cases, is indefinite. The majority of these indemnities and guarantees do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these obligations and no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
(c) Commitments
The Company has the following commitments as of April 30, 2014:
|
a)
|
Administration Agreement with EMAC Handels AG, signed on April 20, 2011, for a six year term and renewed effective May 1, 2014. From May 2011 to April 2013, the Company paid EMAC a monthly fee of $3,500 for administration services, office rent of $250, and office supplies of $125. Commencing May 1, 2013, the monthly fee for administration services increased to $5,000. Extraordinary expenses are invoiced by EMAC on a quarterly basis. The fee may be paid in cash and or with common stock.
|
|
b)
|
Agreement with Stephen M. Studdert, President of Long Canyon, for administration fees of $2,500 per month, signed on December 6, 2012. The fees may be paid in cash and or with common stock.
|
|
c)
|
In order to maintain the Company’s claims and/or leases, the Company must make annual payments to the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and the State of Nevada, due in September of each year. Payment to the BLM is currently $150 per claim and the State of Nevada is currently $70 per claim.
|
F - 16
9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-10,
Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.
The amendments in this Update remove the financial statement distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to: (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows and shareholder equity; (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity; (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged; and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.
For public entities, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2014-10 during its first fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2014.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15,
Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 310-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.
The amendments in this Update provide guidance in GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company has not determined the impact of the future adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2014-15 on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” To simplify presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this Update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this Update. For public companies, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this Update is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The Company has not determined the impact of the future adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2015-03 on its consolidated financial statements..
10.
Supplemental Statement of Cash Flows Information
During the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company paid no amounts for income taxes.
During the years ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company paid $1,550 and $0 for interest.
During the year ended April 30, 2015, the Company had the following non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
·
|
Increased common stock by $240 and additional paid-in capital by $174,760 and decreased payables – related parties by $175,000 for common shares issued for payables – related parties.
|
|
·
|
Increased common stock by $210, increased additional paid-in capital by $180,498, decreased accrued interest payable – related parties by $49,708, and decreased convertible notes payable – related parties by $131,000.
|
|
·
|
Increased common stock by $187, increased additional paid-in capital by $186,379, decreased accrued interest payable by $2,406, decreased derivative liability by $24,585 and decreased convertible notes payable (net of discount) by $158,168.
|
|
·
|
Increased debt discount and derivative liability by $53,326.
|
F - 17
During the year ended April 30, 2014, the Company had the following non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
·
|
Increased common stock by $9 and additional paid-in capital by $169,991 and decreased payables – related parties by $170,000 for common shares issued for payables – related parties.
|
|
·
|
Increased common stock by $1,200, additional paid-in capital by $238,800, and mineral claims by $240,000 for common shares issued for mineral claims.
|
|
·
|
Increased common stock by $100 and additional paid-in capital by $49,900 and decreased payables – related parties by $50,000 for common shares issued for payables – related parties.
|
|
·
|
Increased derivative liability and debt discount by $42,500 for new convertible note payable.
|
|
·
|
Increased convertible notes payable and decreased payables – related parties by $141,150 for payables transferred to convertible notes payable.
|
11. Subsequent Events
In accordance with ASC 855,
Subsequent Events
, the Company has evaluated subsequent events to determine events occurring after April 30, 2015 that would have a material impact on the Company’s results or require disclosure.
Vaportech Acquisition
On June 6, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 90% of Vaportech3d LLC, a privately held Nevada limited liability company, formerly known as EMAC Holdings, LLC, a related party, (“Vaportech”), owner of the Cedar Leaf Oil Vapor Technology (the “Technology”). Vaportech will operate as a subsidiary of the Company and the acquisition will be accounted for as a business acquisition. In consideration for the acquisition, the Company will issue 500,000 shares of the Company’s Series “B” convertible preferred stock (“
Series “B” Shares
”) to those persons directed by Vaportech’s management. The previous owner that transferred the Technology to Vaportech will retain a 10% ownership in Vaportech. The Series “B” Shares do not have voting rights, but each share is convertible into 10 shares of the Company’s common stock. The closing of the transaction will be on or before July 31, 2015, subject to the successful conclusion of due diligence by each party.
In addition to the 500,000 Series “B” Shares to be issued at the closing, the Company will use its best efforts to secure up to a maximum of $500,000 in funding and to assist with planned operational expansion and operation of Vaportech and the Technology. There can be no assurance that the necessary funds will be raised. Also, the Company will pay additional Series “B” Shares in the event gross sales of the Technology attain the following thresholds:
|
Gross sales of $5,000,000
|
250,000 shares
|
|
Accumulated gross sales of $18,000,000
|
500,000 shares
|
|
Accumulated gross sales of $36,000,000
|
1,000,000 shares
|
The previous owner of the Technology and 10% owner of Vaportech will receive a royalty of 5% of gross sales.
Because Vaportech was a related party prior to the acquisition, we anticipate the value of the shares issued will be recorded at the predecessor cost of the assets and liabilities of Vaportech.
Convertible Note Payable
In June 2015, the Company paid an institutional investor $25,000, $14,286 principal of the $38,000 convertible note payable and $10,714 in early payment penalties. The $25,000 was provided to the Company by lenders in the form of short-term loans. In addition, on July 1, 2015, the institutional investor converted $10,014 principal of the convertible loan into 181,748 shares of the Company’s common stock.
F -18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5 . Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7 . Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and RelatedItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules