ETR 10-Q Quarterly Report March 31, 2012 | Alphaminr

ETR 10-Q Quarter ended March 31, 2012

ENTERGY CORP /DE/
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 a02512.htm a02512.htm

__________________________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
X
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2012
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization,
Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone
Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.
Commission
File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization,
Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone
Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.
1-11299
ENTERGY CORPORATION
(a Delaware corporation)
639 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113
Telephone (504) 576-4000
72-1229752
1-31508
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
(a Mississippi corporation)
308 East Pearl Street
Jackson, Mississippi 39201
Telephone (601) 368-5000
64-0205830
1-10764
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)
425 West Capitol Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Telephone (501) 377-4000
71-0005900
0-05807
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
(a Louisiana corporation)
1600 Perdido Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Telephone (504) 670-3700
72-0273040
0-20371
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
(a Louisiana limited liability company)
446 North Boulevard
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802
Telephone (800) 368-3749
74-0662730
1-34360
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
(a Texas corporation)
350 Pine Street
Beaumont, Texas 77701
Telephone (409) 981-2000
61-1435798
1-32718
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
(a Texas limited liability company)
446 North Boulevard
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802
Telephone (800) 368-3749
75-3206126
1-09067
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(an Arkansas corporation)
Echelon One
1340 Echelon Parkway
Jackson, Mississippi 39213
Telephone (601) 368-5000
72-0752777

__________________________________________________________________________________________


Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on Entergy’s corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Large
accelerated
filer
Accelerated
filer
Non-
accelerated
filer
Smaller
reporting
company
Entergy Corporation
Ö
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Ö
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Ö
Entergy Louisiana, LLC
Ö
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Ö
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Ö
Entergy Texas, Inc.
Ö
System Energy Resources, Inc.
Ö

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No þ

Common Stock Outstanding
Outstanding at April 30, 2012
Entergy Corporation
($0.01 par value)
177,159,198

Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc. separately file this combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Information contained herein relating to any individual company is filed by such company on its own behalf.  Each company reports herein only as to itself and makes no other representations whatsoever as to any other company.  This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q supplements and updates the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2011, filed by the individual registrants with the SEC, and should be read in conjunction therewith.



INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2012

Page Number
iii
v
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
1
16
17
18
20
22
23
24
63
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
64
70
71
72
74
75
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
76
83
84
85
86
88
89
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
90
95
96
97
98
100
101
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
102
106
107
108
110
111


ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2012

Page Number
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
112
116
117
118
120
121
Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
122
126
127
128
130
131
System Energy Resources, Inc.
132
135
137
138
140
141
141
141
142
145
149




In this combined report and from time to time, Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries each makes statements as a registrant concerning its expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or performance.  Such statements are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Words such as "may," "will," "could," "project," "believe," "anticipate," "intend," "expect," "estimate," "continue," "potential," "plan," "predict," "forecast," and other similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the only means to identify these statements.  Although each of these registrants believes that these forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, it cannot provide assurance that they will prove correct.  Any forward-looking statement is based on information current as of the date of this combined report and speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made.  Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws, these registrants undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties.  There are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including those factors discussed or incorporated by reference in (a) Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Form 10-K, (b) Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and in this report, and (c) the following factors (in addition to others described elsewhere in this combined report and in subsequent securities filings):

·
resolution of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including various performance-based rate discussions, Entergy's utility supply plan, and recovery of fuel and purchased power costs;
·
the termination of Entergy Arkansas’s and Entergy Mississippi’s participation in the System Agreement in December 2013 and November 2015, respectively;
·
regulatory and operating challenges and uncertainties associated with the Utility operating companies’ proposal to move to the MISO RTO, the operations of the independent coordinator of transmission for Entergy's utility service territory, and the scheduled expiration of the current independent coordinator of transmission arrangement in November 2012;
·
risks associated with the proposed spin-off and subsequent merger of Entergy’s electric transmission business into a subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp., including the risk that Entergy and the Utility operating companies may not be able to timely satisfy the conditions or obtain the approvals required to complete such transaction or such approvals may contain material restrictions or conditions, and the risk that if completed, the transaction may not achieve its anticipated results;
·
changes in utility regulation, including the beginning or end of retail and wholesale competition, the ability to recover net utility assets and other potential stranded costs, and the application of more stringent transmission reliability requirements or market power criteria by the FERC;
·
changes in regulation of nuclear generating facilities and nuclear materials and fuel, including possible shutdown of nuclear generating facilities, particularly those owned or operated by the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business, and the effects of new or existing safety concerns regarding nuclear power plants and nuclear fuel;
·
resolution of pending or future applications, and related regulatory proceedings and litigation, for license renewals or modifications of nuclear generating facilities;
·
the performance of and deliverability of power from Entergy's generation resources, including the capacity factors at its nuclear generating facilities;
·
Entergy's ability to develop and execute on a point of view regarding future prices of electricity, natural gas, and other energy-related commodities;
·
prices for power generated by Entergy's merchant generating facilities and the ability to hedge, sell power forward or otherwise reduce the market price risk associated with those facilities, including the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants;
·
the prices and availability of fuel and power Entergy must purchase for its Utility customers, and Entergy's ability to meet credit support requirements for fuel and power supply contracts;


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION (Concluded)

·
volatility and changes in markets for electricity, natural gas, uranium, and other energy-related commodities;
·
changes in law resulting from federal or state energy legislation or legislation subjecting energy derivatives used in hedging and risk management transactions to governmental regulation;
·
changes in environmental, tax, and other laws, including requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, carbon, mercury, and other substances, and changes in costs of compliance with environmental and other laws and regulations;
·
uncertainty regarding the establishment of interim or permanent sites for spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste storage and disposal;
·
variations in weather and the occurrence of hurricanes and other storms and disasters, including uncertainties associated with efforts to remediate the effects of hurricanes, ice storms, or other weather events and the recovery of costs associated with restoration, including accessing funded storm reserves, federal and local cost recovery mechanisms, securitization, and insurance;
·
effects of climate change;
·
Entergy's ability to manage its capital projects and operation and maintenance costs;
·
Entergy's ability to purchase and sell assets at attractive prices and on other attractive terms;
·
the economic climate, and particularly economic conditions in Entergy's Utility service territory and the Northeast United States and events that could influence economic conditions in those areas;
·
the effects of Entergy's strategies to reduce tax payments;
·
changes in the financial markets, particularly those affecting the availability of capital and Entergy's ability to refinance existing debt, execute share repurchase programs, and fund investments and acquisitions;
·
actions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt and preferred stock, changes in general corporate ratings, and changes in the rating agencies' ratings criteria;
·
changes in inflation and interest rates;
·
the effect of litigation and government investigations or proceedings;
·
advances in technology;
·
the potential effects of threatened or actual terrorism, cyber attacks or data security breaches, and war or a catastrophic event such as a nuclear accident or a natural gas pipeline explosion;
·
Entergy's ability to attract and retain talented management and directors;
·
changes in accounting standards and corporate governance;
·
declines in the market prices of marketable securities and resulting funding requirements for Entergy's defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans;
·
changes in decommissioning trust fund values or earnings or in the timing of or cost to decommission nuclear plant sites;
·
factors that could lead to impairment of long-lived assets; and
·
the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition, or divestiture plans, regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of merger, acquisition, or divestiture, and the success of the business following a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.



Certain abbreviations or acronyms used in the text and notes are defined below:
Abbreviation or Acronym
Term
AFUDC
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
ALJ
Administrative Law Judge
ANO 1 and 2
Units 1 and 2 of Arkansas Nuclear One (nuclear), owned by Entergy Arkansas
APSC
Arkansas Public Service Commission
ASU
Accounting Standards Update issued by the FASB
Board
Board of Directors of Entergy Corporation
capacity factor
Actual plant output divided by maximum potential plant output for the period
City Council or Council
Council of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana
D.C. Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Entergy
Entergy Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries
Entergy Corporation
Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Entergy Gulf States, Inc.
Predecessor company for financial reporting purposes to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that included the assets and business operations of both Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., a company created in connection with the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and the successor company to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. for financial reporting purposes.  The term is also used to refer to the Louisiana jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires.
Entergy Texas
Entergy Texas, Inc., a company created in connection with the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc.  The term is also used to refer to the Texas jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires.
Entergy Wholesale
Commodities (EWC)
Entergy’s non-utility business segment primarily comprised of the ownership and operation of six nuclear power plants, the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants, and the sale of the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
ERCOT
Electric Reliability Council of Texas
FASB
Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitzPatrick
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Form 10-K
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC by Entergy Corporation and its Registrant Subsidiaries
Grand Gulf
Unit No. 1 of Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (nuclear), 90% owned or leased by System Energy
GWh
Gigawatt-hour(s), which equals one million kilowatt-hours
Independence
Independence Steam Electric Station (coal), owned 16% by Entergy Arkansas, 25% by Entergy Mississippi, and 7% by Entergy Power
Indian Point 2
Unit 2 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Indian Point 3
Unit 3 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
IRS
Internal Revenue Service
ISO
Independent System Operator


DEFINITIONS (Concluded)

Abbreviation or Acronym
Term
kW
Kilowatt, which equals one thousand watts
kWh
Kilowatt-hour(s)
LPSC
Louisiana Public Service Commission
MISO
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., a regional transmission organization
MMBtu
One million British Thermal Units
MPSC
Mississippi Public Service Commission
MW
Megawatt(s), which equals one thousand kilowatts
MWh
Megawatt-hour(s)
Net MW in operation
Installed capacity owned and operated
NRC
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NYPA
New York Power Authority
Palisades
Palisades Power Plant (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Pilgrim
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
PPA
Purchased power agreement or power purchase agreement
PUCT
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Registrant Subsidiaries
Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc.
River Bend
River Bend Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
RTO
Regional transmission organization
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
SPP
Southwest Power Pool
System Agreement
Agreement, effective January 1, 1983, as modified, among the Utility operating companies relating to the sharing of generating capacity and other power resources
System Energy
System Energy Resources, Inc.
TWh
Terawatt-hour(s), which equals one billion kilowatt-hours
Unit Power Sales Agreement
Agreement, dated as of June 10, 1982, as amended and approved by FERC, among Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy, relating to the sale of capacity and energy from System Energy’s share of Grand Gulf
Utility
Entergy’s business segment that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power, with a small amount of natural gas distribution
Utility operating companies
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas
Vermont Yankee
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Waterford 3
Unit No. 3 (nuclear) of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, 100% owned or leased by Entergy Louisiana
weather-adjusted usage
Electric usage excluding the effects of deviations from normal weather





MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Entergy operates primarily through two business segments: Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.

·
The Utility business segment includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operates a small natural gas distribution business.  As discussed in more detail in “Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business,” in the Form 10-K, in December 2011, Entergy entered into an agreement to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly-formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp.
·
The Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment includes the ownership and operation of six nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers.  This business also provides services to other nuclear power plant owners.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities also owns interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers.

Results of Operations

Following are income statement variances for Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities, Parent & Other, and Entergy comparing the first quarter 2012 to the first quarter 2011 showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior period:

Utility
Entergy
Wholesale Commodities
Parent &
Other (1)
Entergy
(In Thousands)
1st Qtr 2011 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$168,653
$123,233
($38,208)
$253,678
Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel
expense, purchased power, and other
regulatory charges/credits)
(42,398)
(72,981)
(1,155)
(116,534)
Other operation and maintenance expenses
42,025
23,597
265
65,887
Asset impairment
-
355,524
-
355,524
Taxes other than income taxes
3,508
8,357
71
11,936
Depreciation and amortization
7,481
7,840
9
15,330
Other income
10,335
4,850
(2,513)
12,672
Interest expense
5,565
2,403
1,786
9,754
Other expenses
1,296
1,241
-
2,537
Income taxes (benefit)
9,503
(175,348)
1,433
(164,412)
1st Qtr 2012 Consolidated Net Income (Loss)
$67,212
($168,512)
($45,440)
($146,740)

(1)
Parent & Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment activity.

1

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Refer to " ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES - SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS " for further information with respect to operating statistics.

As discussed in more detail in Note 11 to the financial statements, first quarter 2012 results of operations include a $355.5 million ($223.5 million after-tax) impairment charge to write down the carrying values of Vermont Yankee and related assets to their fair values.

Net Revenue

Utility

Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the first quarter 2012 to the first quarter 2011.

Amount
(In Millions)
2011 net revenue
$1,148
Volume/weather
(48)
Net gas revenue
(8)
Retail electric price
12
Other
2
2012 net revenue
$1,106

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of milder weather on residential and commercial sales.  This was partially offset by an increase of 748 GWh in weather-adjusted usage, primarily in the industrial sector.  Industrial sales growth was largely due to expansions.  This sector had growth from both large and small industrial customers.  Improvements in chemicals were partially offset by declines in refineries and pipelines.

The net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather compared to the same period in the prior year.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to:

·
a special formula rate plan rate increase at Entergy Louisiana effective May 2011 in accordance with a previous LPSC order relating to the acquisition of Unit 2 of the Acadia Energy Center; and
·
a base rate increase at Entergy Texas beginning May 2011 as a result of the settlement of the December 2009 rate case.

These increases were partially offset by a formula rate plan decrease at Entergy New Orleans effective October 2011.  See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of these proceedings.


2

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the first quarter 2012 to the first quarter 2011.

Amount
(In Millions)
2011 net revenue
$525
Realized price changes
(63)
Volume
(7)
Other
(3)
2012 net revenue
$452

As shown in the table above, net revenue for Entergy Wholesale Commodities decreased by $73 million, or 14%, in the first quarter 2012 compared to the first quarter 2011 primarily due to lower pricing in its contracts to sell power and lower volume in its nuclear fleet resulting from more planned and unplanned outage days in 2012 compared to the same period in 2011.

Following are key performance measures for Entergy Wholesale Commodities for the first quarter 2012 and 2011:

2012
2011
Owned capacity
6,612
6,016
GWh billed
11,193
10,519
Average realized price per MWh
$49.68
$56.98
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet
Capacity factor
88%
91%
GWh billed
9,838
9,913
Average realized revenue per MWh
$50.32
$57.46
Refueling Outage Days:
Indian Point 2
27
-
Indian Point 3
-
23

Realized Revenue per MWh for Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Plants

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear business’s average realized price per MWh, including the factors that influence it and the decrease in the annual average realized price per MWh to $54.73 in 2011 from $59.16 in 2010.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ nuclear business is likely to continue to experience a decrease again in 2012 from 2011 because, as shown in the contracted sale of energy table in "Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments," Entergy Wholesale Commodities has sold forward 89% of its planned nuclear energy output for the remainder of 2012 for an average contracted energy price of $48 per MWh.  In addition, Entergy Wholesale Commodities has sold forward 84% of its planned nuclear energy output for 2013 for an average contracted energy price of $45-50 per MWh.
3

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Other Income Statement Items

Utility

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $448 million for the first quarter 2011 to $490 million for the first quarter 2012 primarily due to:
·
an increase of $14 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to decreasing discount rates and changes in certain actuarial assumptions resulting from a recent experience study.  See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs;
·
an increase of $13 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses resulting from higher outage costs primarily because the scope of outages was greater than the same period in the prior year and the timing of the outages;
·
$6 million of costs incurred in 2012 related to the planned spin-off and merger of the Utility’s transmission business;
·
an increase of $6 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher labor costs, including higher contract labor;
·
nuclear insurance refunds of $5 million received in 2011; and
·
an increase of $4 million in contract costs due to the transition and implementation of joining the MISO RTO.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.

Other income increased primarily due to an increase of $6 million in realized earnings on decommissioning trust fund investments and AFUDC accrued on projects under construction, primarily from the Grand Gulf uprate project.

Interest expense increased primarily due to net debt issuances by certain of the Utility operating companies.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased from $209 million for the first quarter 2011 to $233 million for the first quarter 2012 primarily due to:

·
an increase of $12 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to decreasing discount rates and changes in certain actuarial assumptions resulting from a recent experience study.  See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs;
·
an increase of $4 million due to the operations of the Rhode Island State Energy Center, which was acquired in December 2011; and
·
several individually insignificant items.

The asset impairment variance is due to a $355.5 million ($223.5 million after-tax) impairment charge to write down the carrying values of Vermont Yankee and related assets to their fair values.  See Note 11 to the financial statements for further discussion of this charge.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to increased property taxes at FitzPatrick.  Previously, Fitzpatrick was granted an exemption from property taxation and paid taxes according to a payment in lieu of property taxes agreement.  This agreement expired on June 30, 2011 and FitzPatrick is now being taxed under the current property tax system.
4

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Depreciation expense increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service, including the acquisition of the Rhode Island State Energy Center in December 2011.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates for the first quarters 2012 and 2011 were 0.11% and 39.3%, respectively.  The difference in the effective income tax rate versus the statutory rate of 35% for the first quarter 2012 was primarily because the expected tax benefit of the pre-tax loss that Entergy incurred in the first quarter 2012 was partially offset by the write-off of a portion of the regulatory asset for income taxes that is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements.  The difference in the effective income tax rate versus the statutory rate of 35% for the first quarter 2011 was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences for utility plant items.
Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s plan to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp.

Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants

The NRC operating licenses for Pilgrim, Indian Point 2, and Indian Point 3 expire in June 2012, September 2013, and December 2015, respectively.  NRC license renewal applications are pending for each plant.  Under federal law, nuclear power plants may continue to operate beyond their license expiration dates while their renewal applications are pending NRC approval.  In addition, in March 2011 the NRC renewed Vermont Yankee’s operating license for an additional 20 years, as a result of which the license now expires in 2032.  For additional discussion regarding activity in Vermont and the continued operation of the Vermont Yankee plant, see “ Impairment of Long-Lived Assets ” in Note 11 to the financial statements herein.

In the Pilgrim license renewal proceeding, there remain pending two matters that could present an obstacle to the NRC staff’s issuance of a renewed license.  First, the NRC referred to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) an intervenor request to reopen the record to admit a new contention with a request for decision on admissibility by May 29, 2012.  Second, while four intervenor appeals of ASLB decisions were denied by the NRC during the first quarter 2012, one such appeal remains pending.  On April 23, 2012, the NRC staff issued a request to the NRC Commissioner asking for authorization to issue a renewed Pilgrim license notwithstanding the pendency of these matters.  The NRC Staff asked that the NRC act by May 8, 2012.  Outside of the NRC license renewal process, intervenors have taken steps to slow or block license renewal.  Such steps include the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’s appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit of an NRC decision affirming the ASLB’s decision not to admit a late-filed contention and an April 2012 letter sent by certain parties to the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (OCZM) requesting that OCZM suspend its 2006 consistency determination issued for Pilgrim license renewal.

In April 2007, Entergy submitted an application to the NRC to renew the operating licenses for Indian Point 2 and 3 for an additional 20 years.  The ASLB has admitted 21 contentions raised by the State of New York or other parties, which were combined into 16 discrete issues.  Two of the issues have been resolved, leaving 14 issues that are currently subject to ASLB hearings.  In July 2011, the ASLB granted the State of New York’s motion for summary disposition of an admitted contention challenging the adequacy of a section of Indian Point’s environmental analysis as incorporated in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) (discussed below).  That section provided cost estimates for Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMAs), which are hardware and procedural changes that could be implemented to mitigate estimated impacts of off-site radiological releases in case of a hypothesized severe accident.  In addition to finding that the SAMA cost analysis was insufficient, the ASLB directed the NRC staff to explain why cost-beneficial SAMAs should not be required to be implemented.  Entergy appealed the ASLB’s decision to the NRC and the NRC staff supported Entergy’s appeal, while the State of New York opposed it.  In December 2011 the NRC denied Entergy’s appeal as premature, stating that the appeal could be renewed at the conclusion of the ASLB proceedings.
5

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

In November 2011 the ASLB issued an order establishing deadlines for the submission of several rounds of testimony on most of the contentions pending before the ASLB and for the filing of motions to limit or exclude testimony.  Most of the testimony on those contentions has now been completed and filed, and the ASLB has scheduled the commencement of hearings for October 15, 2012.  Hearings on the remaining issues will follow the submission of testimony on dates yet to be set.

The NRC staff currently is also performing its technical and environmental reviews of the application.  The NRC staff issued a Final Safety Evaluation Report (FSER) in August 2009, a supplement to the FSER in August 2011, and a FSEIS in December 2010.  The NRC staff has stated its intent to issue a draft supplemental FSEIS in May 2012 and, following an opportunity for comment, to issue a final supplement FSEIS later in 2012.  The NRC staff also plans to issue a supplemental SER in August 2012.
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has taken the position that Indian Point must obtain a new state-issued Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certification as part of the license renewal process.  In addition, the consistency of Indian Point’s operations with New York State’s coastal management policies must be resolved as required by the Coastal Zone Management Act.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ efforts to obtain these certifications and determinations continue in 2012.

The hearing process is an integral component of the NRC’s regulatory framework, and evidentiary hearings on license renewal applications are not uncommon.  Entergy intends to participate fully in the hearing process as permitted by the NRC’s hearing rules.  As noted in Entergy’s responses to the various intervenor filings, Entergy believes the contentions proposed by the intervenors are unsupported and without merit.  Entergy will continue to work with the NRC staff as it completes its technical and environmental reviews of the license renewal application.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s capital structure, capital expenditure plans and other uses of capital, and sources of capital.  Following are updates to that discussion.

Capital Structure

Entergy’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Debt to capital
57.8 %
57.3 %
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds
(2.1)%
(2.3)%
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)
55.7 %
55.0 %
Effect of subtracting cash
(1.5)%
(1.5)%
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)
54.2 %
53.5 %

(1)
Calculation excludes the Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy Texas, respectively.

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt, common shareholders’ equity, and subsidiaries’ preferred stock without sinking fund.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio and the ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy’s financial condition.
6

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion and expires in March 2017.  Entergy Corporation has the ability to issue letters of credit against 50% of the total borrowing capacity of the facility.  Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and capacity available under the facility as of March 31, 2012.


Capacity
Borrowings
Letters
of Credit
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500
$1,465
$8
$2,027
A covenant in Entergy Corporation’s credit facility requires Entergy to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.  The calculation of this debt ratio under Entergy Corporation’s credit facility is different than the calculation of the debt to capital ratio above.  Entergy is currently in compliance with the covenant.  If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility’s maturity date may occur.

See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the Entergy Corporation credit facility and discussion of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ credit facilities.

Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital

See the table and discussion in the Form 10-K under "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital," that sets forth the amounts of planned construction and other capital investments by operating segment for 2012 through 2014.  Following are updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.

Grand Gulf Uprate

As discussed in more detail in the Form 10-K, the estimated capital investments for 2012-2014 include System Energy’s planned approximate 178 MW uprate of the Grand Gulf nuclear plant.  Considering the progress of the uprate project during Grand Gulf’s spring 2012 refueling outage, including additional work scope that has emerged during the outage; additional information from the project's engineering, procurement and construction contractor; the costs required to install instrumentation in the steam dryer in response to evolving guidance from the NRC staff; and delays in obtaining NRC approval; System Energy now estimates the total capital investment to be made in the course of the implementation of the Grand Gulf uprate project is approximately $874 million, including SMEPA’s share.  Implementation of the uprate and the NRC’s review continues.  System Energy expects to complete the project during the summer of 2012.

Ninemile Point Unit 6 Self-Build Project

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s Ninemile Point Unit 6 self-build project.  The Ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% to Entergy Louisiana, 25% to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and 20% to Entergy New Orleans.  In February 2012 the City Council passed a resolution authorizing Entergy New Orleans to purchase 20% of the Ninemile 6 energy and capacity.  In June 2011, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by Entergy Louisiana’s construction of the facility.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana joined in the application, seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of its allocated share of the capacity and energy generated by Ninemile 6.  In March 2012 the LPSC unanimously voted to grant the certifications requested by Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana has given the contractor a full notice to proceed with the construction. Under the terms approved by the LPSC, costs may be recovered through Entergy Louisiana’s and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s formula rate plans, if one is in effect when the project is placed in service; alternatively, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s must file rate cases approximately 12 months prior to the expected in-service date.
7

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Hot Spring Energy Facility Purchase Agreement

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s agreement to acquire the Hot Spring Energy Facility.  The parties have satisfied their obligations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, and the U.S. Department of Justice’s review of the transaction is ongoing.

In July 2011, Entergy Arkansas filed its application with the APSC requesting approval of the acquisition and full cost recovery.  In January 2012, Entergy Arkansas, the APSC General Staff, and the Arkansas Attorney General filed a Motion to Suspend the Procedural Schedule and Joint Stipulation and Settlement for consideration by the APSC.  Under the settlement, the parties agreed that the acquisition costs may be recovered through a capacity acquisition rider and agreed that the level of the return on equity reflected in the rider would be submitted to the APSC for resolution.  Because the transmission upgrade costs remained uncertain, the parties requested that the APSC suspend the procedural schedule and cancel the hearing scheduled for January 24, 2012, pending resolution of the transmission costs.  The APSC issued an order accepting the settlement as part of the record and directing Entergy Arkansas to file the transmission studies when available and directing the parties to propose a procedural schedule to address the results of those studies.

On April 6, 2012, facilities studies were issued indicating that long-term transmission service is available for the Hot Spring facility provided that supplemental transmission upgrades estimated at approximately $440,000 are made.  In addition, the studies noted that surveys of two lines should be conducted, which may result in additional upgrade requirements not expected to exceed $25 million.  On April 16, 2012, Entergy Arkansas filed the facilities studies with the APSC and reiterated its request for a public interest finding and timely cost recovery.  Assuming timely regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of all other closing conditions, closing is targeted for around mid-2012.

Hinds Energy Facility Purchase Agreement

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s agreement to acquire the Hinds Energy Facility.  In July 2011, Entergy Mississippi filed with the MPSC requesting approval of the acquisition and full cost recovery.  The parties have satisfied their obligations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, and the U.S. Department of Justice’s review of the transaction is ongoing.  In February 2012 the MPSC granted a certificate of public convenience and necessity and approved the estimated acquisition cost.  In April 2012, facilities studies were issued indicating that long-term transmission service is available for the Hinds facility provided that supplemental transmission upgrades estimated at approximately $580,000 are made and assuming that various projects already included in the transmission construction plan are completed.  The retail cost recovery proceeding remains pending before the MPSC.  Assuming timely regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of all other closing conditions, closing is targeted for around mid-2012.

Dividends and Stock Repurchases

Declarations of dividends on Entergy’s common stock are made at the discretion of the Board.  Among other things, the Board evaluates the level of Entergy’s common stock dividends based upon Entergy’s earnings, financial strength, and future investment opportunities.  At its April 2012 meeting, the Board declared a dividend of $0.83 per share, which is the same quarterly dividend per share that Entergy has paid since second quarter 2010.
8

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Cash Flow Activity

As shown in Entergy’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

2012
2011
(In Millions)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$694
$1,294
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
601
323
Investing activities
(749)
(897)
Financing activities
139
6
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(9)
(568)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$685
$726
Operating Activities

Entergy's cash flow provided by operating activities increased by $278 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease of $172 million in pension contributions and an increase in deferred fuel cost collections.  Partially offsetting these factors were the decreases in net revenue that are discussed above.  See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $148 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to:

·
a decrease in nuclear fuel purchases because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle;
·
a change in collateral deposit activity, reflected in the “Decrease (increase) in other investments” line on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, as Entergy received $95 million in net deposits from Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ counterparties during 2012 and returned net deposits of $21 million in 2011.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ forward sales contracts are discussed in the Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments section below; and
·
an increase in construction expenditures, primarily in the Utility business resulting from spending on the power uprate project at Grand Gulf.  Entergy’s construction spending plans for 2012 through 2014 are discussed in the Form 10-K and are updated in the Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital section in this report.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $133 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to the following:

·
Entergy repurchased $54 million of its common stock in the three months ended March 31, 2011.  Entergy’s share repurchase programs are discussed in the Form 10-K.
·
$51 million in proceeds from the sale in 2012 of a portion of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s investment in Entergy Holdings Company’s Class A preferred membership interests to a third party.
9

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

·
Long-term debt activity provided approximately $175 million of cash in 2012 compared to $133 million of cash in 2011.  For details of Entergy's long-term debt activity in 2012 see Note 4 to the financial statements herein.

Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation

See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation " in the Form 10-K for discussions of rate regulation, federal regulation, and related regulatory proceedings.

State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery

See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K regarding these proceedings.

Federal Regulation

Entergy’s Proposal to Join the MISO RTO

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Utility operating companies proposal to join the MISO RTO.  Following are updates to that discussion.

On March 14, 2012, the LPSC Staff and intervenors filed direct testimony in Entergy Louisiana’s and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s joint change of control proceeding.  In Entergy Arkansas’s proceeding, the APSC Staff and intervenors filed direct testimony on March 16, 2012.  Intervenors began filing direct testimony in the Entergy New Orleans and Entergy Mississippi proceedings on March 23, 2012 and April 23, 2012, respectively.  Most parties were conditionally supportive of or did not oppose certifying the move to MISO as in the public interest.  Several parties, including the LPSC Staff, proposed various conditions.  The APSC Staff argued Entergy Arkansas has not proven that it is in the public interest to join MISO and noted that Entergy Arkansas should maintain the option to join SPP.  On April 13, 2012, Entergy Arkansas filed rebuttal testimony addressing the claims made by parties challenging the MISO proposal, and on April 19, 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed responsive testimony to the prefiled testimony of the LPSC Staff and intervenors.  The LPSC hearing on the merits was completed on May 2, 2012.  The APSC has established a procedural schedule with hearing the hearing on the merits commencing May 30, 2012.  The MPSC has scheduled a hearing in July 2012.  The City Council has scheduled a hearing in September 2012.  Entergy Texas submitted its change of control filing on April 30, 2012.

In June 2011, MISO filed with the FERC a request for a transitional waiver of provisions of its open access transmission, energy, and operating reserve markets tariff regarding allocation of transmission network upgrade costs, in order to establish a transition for the integration of the Utility operating companies.  In September 2011 the FERC issued an order denying on procedural grounds MISO’s request, further advising MISO that submitting modified tariff sheets is the appropriate method for implementing the transition that MISO seeks for the Utility operating companies.  The FERC did not address the merits of any transition arrangements that may be appropriate to integrate the Utility operating companies into MISO.  MISO worked with its stakeholders to prepare the appropriate changes to its tariff and filed the proposed tariff changes with the FERC in November 2011.  On April 19, 2012, the FERC conditionally accepted MISO’s proposal related to the allocation of transmission upgrade costs in connection with the transition and integration of the Utility operating companies into MISO.
10

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


In addition, the Utility operating companies have agreed to give authority to the Entergy Regional State Committee (E-RSC), upon unanimous vote and within the first five years after the Utility operating companies join the MISO RTO, (i) to direct the allocation of certain transmission upgrade costs among the Utility operating companies’ transmission pricing zones in a manner that differs from the allocation that would occur under the MISO OATT and (ii) to direct the Utility operating companies as transmission owners to add projects to MISO’s transmission expansion plan.

Market and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments

Commodity Price Risk

Power Generation

As a wholesale generator, Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ core business is selling energy, measured in MWh, to its customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities enters into forward contracts with its customers and sells energy in the day ahead or spot markets.  In addition to selling the energy produced by its plants, Entergy Wholesale Commodities sells unforced capacity, which allows load-serving entities to meet specified reserve and related requirements placed on them by the ISOs in their respective areas.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ forward fixed price physical power contracts consist of contracts to sell energy only, contracts to sell capacity only, and bundled contracts in which it sells both capacity and energy.  While the terminology and payment mechanics vary in these contracts, each of these types of contracts requires Entergy Wholesale Commodities to deliver MWh of energy, make capacity available, or both.  In addition to its forward fixed price physical power contracts, Entergy Wholesale Commodities also uses financial contracts to hedge a portion of its commodity price risk.  The following is a summary of the amount of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ planned energy output that is currently sold forward under physical or financial contracts (2012 represents the remainder of the year):
Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Portfolio
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Energy
Percent of planned generation sold forward (a):
Unit-contingent (b)
60%
41%
14%
12%
12%
Unit-contingent with guarantee of availability (c)
18%
19%
15%
13%
13%
Firm LD (d)
24%
24%
20%
-%
-%
Offsetting positions (e)
(13)%
-%
-%
-%
-%
Total energy sold forward
89%
84%
49%
25%
25%
Planned generation (TWh) (f) (g)
31
40
41
41
40
Average revenue under contract per MWh (h)
$48
$45-50
$47-51
$49-57
$50-59

Capacity
Percent of capacity sold forward (i):
Bundled capacity and energy contracts (j)
16%
16%
16%
16%
16%
Capacity contracts (k)
43%
31%
25%
17%
5%
Total capacity sold forward
59%
47%
41%
33%
21%
Planned net MW in operation (g) (l)
5,011
5,011
5,011
5,011
5,011
Average revenue under contract per kW per month
(applies to capacity contracts only) (h)
$2.3
$2.9
$3.1
$3.2
$3.4
Blended Capacity and Energy Recap (based on revenues)
% of planned generation and capacity sold forward
92%
85%
54%
31%
30%
Average revenue under contract per MWh (h)
$50
$46
$48
$52
$51
11

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy Wholesale Commodities Non-Nuclear Portfolio
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Energy
Percent of planned generation sold forward (a):
Cost-based contracts (m)
41%
36%
30%
35%
32%
Firm LD (d)
5%
5%
5%
6%
6%
Total energy sold forward
46%
41%
35%
41%
38%
Planned generation (TWh) (f) (n)
5
7
7
6
6
Capacity
Percent of capacity sold forward (i):
Cost-based contracts (m)
35%
29%
24%
24%
24%
Bundled capacity and energy contracts (j)
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
Capacity contracts (k)
52%
47%
47%
48%
20%
Total capacity sold forward
95%
84%
79%
80%
52%
Planned net MW in operation (l) (n)
1,052
1,052
1,052
1,052
1,052

(a)
Percent of planned generation output sold or purchased forward under contracts, forward physical contracts, forward financial contracts or options that mitigate price uncertainty that may require regulatory approval or approval of transmission rights
(b)
Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the asset is not operating, seller is generally not liable to buyer for any damages
(c)
A sale of power on a unit-contingent basis coupled with a guarantee of availability provides for the payment to the power purchaser of contract damages, if incurred, in the event the seller fails to deliver power as a result of the failure of the specified generation unit to generate power at or above a specified availability threshold.  All of Entergy’s outstanding guarantees of availability provide for dollar limits on Entergy’s maximum liability under such guarantees.
(d)
Transaction that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point (usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset) or settles financially on notional quantities; if a party fails to deliver or receive energy, defaulting party must compensate the other party as specified in the contract; a portion of which may be capped through the use of risk management products
(e)
Transactions for the purchase of energy, generally to offset a Firm LD transaction
(f)
Amount of output expected to be generated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities resources considering plant operating characteristics, outage schedules, and expected market conditions that effect dispatch
(g)
Assumes NRC license renewal for plants whose current licenses expire within five years and uninterrupted normal operation at all plants.  NRC license renewal applications are in process for three units, as follows (with current license expirations in parentheses): Pilgrim (June 2012), Indian Point 2 (September 2013), and Indian Point 3 (December 2015).  For a discussion regarding the continued operation of the Vermont Yankee plant, see “ Impairment of Long-Lived Assets ” in Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and “ Vermont Yankee ” in Note 11 to the financial statements herein.
(h)
Revenue on a per unit basis at which generation output, capacity, or a combination of both is expected to be sold to third parties (including offsetting positions), given existing contract or option exercise prices based on expected dispatch or capacity, excluding the revenue associated with the amortization of the below-market PPA for Palisades.  Revenue may fluctuate due to factors including positive or negative basis differentials, option premiums and market prices at time of option expiration, costs to convert firm LD to unit-contingent, and other risk management costs.  Also, average revenue under contract excludes payments owed under the value sharing agreement with NYPA.
12

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

(i) Percent of planned qualified capacity sold to mitigate price uncertainty under physical or financial transactions.
(j)
A contract for the sale of installed capacity and related energy, priced per megawatt-hour sold
(k)
A contract for the sale of an installed capacity product in a regional market
(l)
Amount of capacity to be available to generate power and/or sell capacity considering uprates planned to be completed during the year.  The increased capacity figure for the nuclear portfolio from the 10-K reflects the final testing and confirmation of a small incremental increase in output associated with equipment replacements at Palisades.
(m)
Contracts priced in accordance with cost-based rates, a ratemaking concept used for the design and development of rate schedules to ensure that the filed rate schedules recover only the cost of providing the service; these contracts are on owned non-utility resources located within Entergy’s service territory, which do not operate under market-based rate authority.  The percentage sold assumes approval of long-term transmission rights.  Includes sales to the Utility through 2013 of 121 MW of capacity and energy from Entergy Power sourced from Independence Steam Electric Station Unit 2.
(n)
Non-nuclear planned generation and net MW in operation include purchases from affiliated and non-affiliated counterparties under long-term contracts and exclude energy and capacity from Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ wind investment accounted for under the equity method of accounting and from the 544 MW Ritchie plant that is not planned to operate.

Entergy estimates that a $10 per MWh change in the annual average energy price in the markets in which the Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear business sells power, based on March 31, 2012 market conditions, planned generation volumes, and hedged positions, would have a corresponding effect on pre-tax net income of $41 million in 2012.

Some of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide collateral to secure its obligations under the agreements.  The Entergy subsidiary is required to provide collateral based upon the difference between the current market and contracted power prices in the regions where Entergy Wholesale Commodities sells power.  The primary form of collateral to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty.  Cash and letters of credit are also acceptable forms of collateral.  At March 31, 2012, based on power prices at that time, Entergy had liquidity exposure of $271 million under the guarantees in place supporting Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions, $20 million of guarantees that support letters of credit, and $6 million of posted cash collateral to the ISOs.  As of March 31, 2012, the liquidity exposure associated with Entergy Wholesale Commodities assurance requirements would increase by $71 million for a $1 per MMBtu increase in gas prices in both the short-and long-term markets.  In the event of a decrease in Entergy Corporation’s credit rating to below investment grade, based on power prices as of March 31, 2012, Entergy would have been required to provide approximately $45 million of additional cash or letters of credit under some of the agreements.

As of March 31, 2012, substantially all of the counterparties or their guarantors for 100% of the planned energy output under contract for Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear plants through 2016 have public investment grade credit ratings.

Nuclear Matters

After the nuclear incident in Japan resulting from the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami, the NRC established a task force to conduct a review of processes and regulations relating to nuclear facilities in the United States.  The task force issued a near term (90-day) report in July 2011 that made initial recommendations, which were subsequently refined and prioritized after input from stakeholders.  The task force then issued a second report in September 2011.  Based upon the task force’s recommendations, the NRC issued three orders effective on March 12, 2012.  The three orders require U.S. nuclear operators, including Entergy, to undertake plant modifications or perform additional analyses that will, among other things, result in increased operating and capital costs associated with operating Entergy’s nuclear plants.  The orders are being analyzed and an estimate of the increased costs cannot be made at this time.
13

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis


With the issuance of the three orders, the NRC also provided members of the public an opportunity to request a hearing.  Two established anti-nuclear groups, Pilgrim Watch and Beyond Nuclear, have filed hearing requests, focused on Pilgrim, regarding two of the three orders.  These requests seek to have the NRC impose expanded remedial requirements to address the issues raised by the NRC’s orders.  Entergy has filed oppositions to these hearing requests.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other contingencies.  For updates of the impairment of long-lived assets discussion regarding Vermont Yankee see Note 11 to the financial statements herein.

New Accounting Pronouncements

The accounting standard-setting process, including projects between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to converge U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards, is ongoing and the FASB and the IASB are each currently working on several projects that have not yet resulted in final pronouncements.  Final pronouncements that result from these projects could have a material effect on Entergy’s future net income or financial position.



(Page left blank intentionally)



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$ 1,784,841 $ 1,865,899
Natural gas
46,008 71,123
Competitive businesses
552,810 604,186
TOTAL
2,383,659 2,541,208
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale
538,837 507,693
Purchased power
284,966 362,618
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
63,884 63,985
Asset impairment
355,524 -
Other operation and maintenance
721,635 655,748
Decommissioning
57,903 55,265
Taxes other than income taxes
137,170 125,234
Depreciation and amortization
280,215 264,885
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
382 (5,111 )
TOTAL
2,440,516 2,030,317
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
(56,857 ) 510,891
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
24,307 17,289
Interest and investment income
40,992 26,747
Miscellaneous - net
(17,990 ) (9,399 )
TOTAL
47,309 34,637
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
146,745 136,134
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(9,391 ) (8,534 )
TOTAL
137,354 127,600
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
(146,902 ) 417,928
Income tax expense (benefit)
(162 ) 164,250
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME (LOSS)
(146,740 ) 253,678
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
4,943 5,015
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
$ (151,683 ) $ 248,663
Earnings (loss) per average common share:
Basic
$ (0.86 ) $ 1.39
Diluted
$ (0.86 ) $ 1.38
Dividends declared per common share
$ 0.83 $ 0.83
Basic average number of common shares outstanding
176,865,363 178,834,342
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding
177,388,045 180,083,830
See Notes to Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Net Income (loss)
$ (146,740 ) $ 253,678
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain (loss)
(net of tax expense (benefit) of $75,494 and ($34,635))
145,435 (58,208 )
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(net of tax expense of $3,876 and $1,093)
6,266 4,259
Net unrealized investment gains
(net of tax expense of $49,138 and $25,340)
50,107 24,685
Foreign currency translation
(net of tax expense of $167 and $161)
311 299
Other comprehensive income (loss)
202,119 (28,965 )
Comprehensive Income
55,379 224,713
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
4,943 5,015
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Entergy Corporation
$ 50,436 $ 219,698
See Notes to Financial Statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Consolidated net income (loss)
$ (146,740 ) $ 253,678
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income (loss) to net cash flow
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
450,009 422,411
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
38,858 173,784
Asset impairment
355,524 -
Changes in working capital:
Receivables
156,202 102,711
Fuel inventory
(20,213 ) (12,508 )
Accounts payable
(145,599 ) (154,398 )
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
(89,583 ) (63,918 )
Interest accrued
(32,194 ) (67,978 )
Deferred fuel
77,405 (66,548 )
Other working capital accounts
(34,753 ) (102,294 )
Changes in provisions for estimated losses
(15,030 ) (779 )
Changes in other regulatory assets
60,857 48,889
Changes in pensions and other postretirement liabilities
(4,764 ) (190,958 )
Other
(49,479 ) (18,991 )
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
600,500 323,101
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction/capital expenditures
(563,539 ) (486,561 )
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
25,448 17,289
Nuclear fuel purchases
(201,059 ) (300,975 )
Changes in securitization account
940 6,360
NYPA value sharing payment
(72,000 ) (72,000 )
Payments to storm reserve escrow account
(1,483 ) (1,736 )
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account
861 -
Decrease (increase) in other investments
93,786 (21,212 )
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
535,551 492,682
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(567,780 ) (530,672 )
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(749,275 ) (896,825 )
See Notes to Financial Statements.



ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of:
Long-term debt
1,034,945 411,444
Preferred stock
51,000 -
Common stock and treasury stock
32,826 12,280
Retirement of long-term debt
(859,648 ) (278,084 )
Repurchase of common stock
- (54,404 )
Changes in credit borrowings - net
32,782 68,244
Dividends paid:
Common stock
(146,674 ) (148,678 )
Preferred stock
(5,582 ) (5,015 )
Net cash flow provided by financing activities
139,649 5,787
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
(310 ) (298 )
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(9,436 ) (568,235 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
694,438 1,294,472
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 685,002 $ 726,237
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$ 134,655 $ 164,563
Income taxes
$ 35,992 $ (4,380 )
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$ 63,117 $ 81,468
Temporary cash investments
621,885 612,970
Total cash and cash equivalents
685,002 694,438
Securitization recovery trust account
49,364 50,304
Accounts receivable:
Customer
452,926 568,558
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(30,079 ) (31,159 )
Other
145,677 166,186
Accrued unbilled revenues
260,539 298,283
Total accounts receivable
829,063 1,001,868
Deferred fuel costs
69,924 209,776
Accumulated deferred income taxes
4,650 9,856
Fuel inventory - at average cost
222,345 202,132
Materials and supplies - at average cost
896,633 894,756
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
230,514 231,031
System agreement cost equalization
36,800 36,800
Prepayments and other
452,042 291,742
TOTAL
3,476,337 3,622,703
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliates - at equity
45,769 44,876
Decommissioning trust funds
4,039,319 3,788,031
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
259,867 260,436
Other
419,661 416,423
TOTAL
4,764,616 4,509,766
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Electric
39,300,676 39,385,524
Property under capital lease
808,790 809,449
Natural gas
345,981 343,550
Construction work in progress
2,025,005 1,779,723
Nuclear fuel
1,499,219 1,546,167
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
43,979,671 43,864,413
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
18,392,874 18,255,128
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - NET
25,586,797 25,609,285
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
730,467 799,006
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of
$989,503 as of March 31, 2012 and $1,009,103 as of
December 31, 2011)
4,577,018 4,636,871
Deferred fuel costs
258,534 172,202
Goodwill
377,172 377,172
Accumulated deferred income taxes
31,271 19,003
Other
1,128,012 955,691
TOTAL
7,102,474 6,959,945
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 40,930,224 $ 40,701,699
See Notes to Financial Statements.



ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$ 315,275 $ 2,192,733
Notes payable
141,113 108,331
Accounts payable
916,248 1,069,096
Customer deposits
354,178 351,741
Taxes accrued
188,652 278,235
Accumulated deferred income taxes
94,126 99,929
Interest accrued
151,318 183,512
Deferred fuel costs
279,723 255,839
Obligations under capital leases
3,692 3,631
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
46,341 44,031
System agreement cost equalization
74,207 80,090
Other
345,781 283,531
TOTAL
2,910,654 4,950,699
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
8,163,494 8,096,452
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
282,140 284,747
Obligations under capital leases
37,471 38,421
Other regulatory liabilities
809,729 728,193
Decommissioning and asset retirement cost liabilities
3,352,820 3,296,570
Accumulated provisions
370,761 385,512
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
3,126,583 3,133,657
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $1,048,894 as of
March 31, 2012 and $1,070,556 as of December 31, 2011)
12,121,105 10,043,713
Other
560,697 501,954
TOTAL
28,824,800 26,509,219
Commitments and Contingencies
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
186,510 186,511
EQUITY
Common Shareholders' Equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares;
issued 254,752,788 shares in 2012 and in 2011
2,548 2,548
Paid-in capital
5,352,256 5,360,682
Retained earnings
9,148,262 9,446,960
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
33,667 (168,452 )
Less - treasury stock, at cost (77,601,080 shares in 2012 and
78,396,988 shares in 2011)
5,622,473 5,680,468
Total common shareholders' equity
8,914,260 8,961,270
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
94,000 94,000
TOTAL
9,008,260 9,055,270
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 40,930,224 $ 40,701,699
See Notes to Financial Statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited) (In Thousands)
Common Shareholders' Equity
Subsidiaries' Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Treasury Stock
Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
$ 94,000 $ 2,548 $ (5,524,811 ) $ 5,367,474 $ 8,689,401 $ (38,212 ) $ 8,590,400
Consolidated net income (a)
5,015 - - - 248,663 - 253,678
Other comprehensive loss
- - - - - (28,965 ) (28,965 )
Common stock repurchases
- - (54,404 ) - - - (54,404 )
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
- - 22,930 (956 ) - - 21,974
Common stock dividends declared
- - - - (148,530 ) - (148,530 )
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)
(5,015 ) - - - - - (5,015 )
Balance at March 31, 2011
$ 94,000 $ 2,548 $ (5,556,285 ) $ 5,366,518 $ 8,789,534 $ (67,177 ) $ 8,629,138
Balance at December 31, 2011
$ 94,000 $ 2,548 $ (5,680,468 ) $ 5,360,682 $ 9,446,960 $ (168,452 ) $ 9,055,270
Consolidated net income (loss) (a)
4,943 - - - (151,683 ) - (146,740 )
Other comprehensive income
- - - - - 202,119 202,119
Common stock issuances related to stock plans
- - 57,995 (8,426 ) - - 49,569
Common stock dividends declared
- - - - (147,015 ) - (147,015 )
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries (a)
(4,943 ) - - - - - (4,943 )
Balance at March 31, 2012
$ 94,000 $ 2,548 $ (5,622,473 ) $ 5,352,256 $ 9,148,262 $ 33,667 $ 9,008,260
See Notes to Financial Statements.
(a) Consolidated net income (loss) and preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries for both 2011 and 2012 include $3.3 million of preferred dividends on subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund that is not presented as equity.



SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Increase/
Description
2012
2011
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars in Millions)
Utility Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$ 670 $ 748 $ (78 ) (10 )
Commercial
503 501 2 -
Industrial
489 479 10 2
Governmental
48 47 1 2
Total retail
1,710 1,775 (65 ) (4 )
Sales for resale
39 64 (25 ) (39 )
Other
36 27 9 33
Total
$ 1,785 $ 1,866 $ (81 ) (4 )
Utility Billed Electric Energy
Sales (GWh):
Residential
7,760 9,042 (1,282 ) (14 )
Commercial
6,414 6,449 (35 ) (1 )
Industrial
9,958 9,516 442 5
Governmental
578 583 (5 ) (1 )
Total retail
24,710 25,590 (880 ) (3 )
Sales for resale
732 947 (215 ) (23 )
Total
25,442 26,537 (1,095 ) (4 )
Entergy Wholesale Commodities:
Operating Revenues
$ 560 $ 610 $ (50 ) (8 )
Billed Electric Energy Sales (GWh)
11,193 10,519 674 6



NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, and tax proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions, and governmental agencies in the ordinary course of business.  While management is unable to predict the outcome of such proceedings, management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Entergy’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, except as otherwise discussed in the Form 10-K or in this report.  Entergy discusses regulatory proceedings in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and herein, discusses tax proceedings in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 10 to the financial statements herein, and discusses a judicial proceeding involving Vermont Yankee in Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and in Note 11 to the financial statements herein.

Nuclear Insurance

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property insurance associated with Entergy’s nuclear power plants.

Conventional Property Insurance

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s non-nuclear property insurance program.

Employment Litigation

The Registrant Subsidiaries and other Entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees and third parties not selected for open positions.  These actions include, but are not limited to, allegations of wrongful employment actions; wage disputes and other claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act or its state counterparts; claims of race, gender and disability discrimination; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board; claims of retaliation; and claims for or regarding benefits under various Entergy Corporation sponsored plans.  Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are responding to these lawsuits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants.

Asbestos Litigation (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas)

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding asbestos litigation at Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas.



24

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


NOTE 2.  RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Regulatory Assets

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding regulatory assets in the Utility business presented on the balance sheets of Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries.  Following are updates to that information.

Correction of Regulatory Asset for Income Taxes

In the first quarter 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana determined that its regulatory asset for income taxes was overstated because of a difference between the regulatory treatment of the income taxes associated with certain items (primarily pension expense) and the financial accounting treatment of those taxes.  Beginning with Louisiana retail rate filings using the 1994 test year, retail rates were developed using the normalization method of accounting for income taxes.  With respect to these items, however, the financial accounting for income taxes was computed using the flow-through method of accounting.  As a result, over the years Entergy Gulf States Louisiana accumulated a regulatory asset representing the expected future recovery of tax expense for the affected items even though the tax expense was being collected currently in rates from customers and would not be recovered in the future.

The effect was immaterial to the consolidated balance sheets, results of operations, and cash flows of Entergy for all prior reporting periods and on a cumulative basis.  Therefore, a cumulative adjustment was recorded in the first quarter 2012 to remove the regulatory asset previously recorded.  This adjustment increased 2012 income tax expense by $46.3 million, decreased the regulatory asset for income taxes by $75.3 million, and decreased accumulated deferred income taxes by $29 million.

The effect was also immaterial to the balance sheets, results of operations, and cash flows of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana for all prior reporting periods.  Correcting the cumulative effect of the error in the first quarter 2012 could have been material to the 2012 results of operations of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and, therefore, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana is revising its prior period financial statements to correct the errors.  The corrections affect the prior period financial statements as shown in the tables below:

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
(In Thousands)
Income Statement
Income taxes
$25,852
$24,903
Net income
$45,670
$46,619
Earnings applicable to common equity
$45,464
$46,413
Statement of Cash Flows
Net income
$45,670
$46,619
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits,
and non-current taxes accrued
($25,336)
($26,285)
Changes in other regulatory assets
($15,701)
($17,243)
Other operating activities
$48,274
$49,816
25

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


December 31, 2011
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
(In Thousands)
Balance Sheet
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
$249,058
$173,724
Accumulated deferred income taxes - current
$5,427
$5,107
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
$1,397,230
$1,368,563
Member’s equity
$1,439,733
$1,393,386

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011
Member’s Equity
Total Equity
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
(In Thousands)
Statement of Changes in Equity
Balance at December 31, 2010
$1,539,517
$1,494,593
$1,509,213
$1,464,289
Net income
$45,670
$46,619
$45,670
$46,619
Balance at March 31, 2011
$1,506,576
$1,462,601
$1,477,015
$1,433,040
Fuel and Purchased Power Cost Recovery

Entergy Texas

In December 2011, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to refund approximately $43 million, including interest, of fuel cost recovery over-collections through October 2011.  Entergy Texas and the parties to the proceeding reached an agreement that Entergy Texas will refund $67 million, including interest and additional over-recoveries through December 2011, over a three-month period.  Entergy Texas and the parties requested that interim rates consistent with the settlement be approved effective with the March 2012 billing month, and the PUCT approved the application in March 2012.
Retail Rate Proceedings

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for detailed information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the Utility operating companies.  The following are updates to the Form 10-K.

Filings with the LPSC

Retail Rates - Gas (Entergy Gulf States Louisiana)

In January 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2011.  The filing showed an earned return on common equity of 10.48%, which is within the earnings bandwidth of 10.5%, plus or minus fifty basis points.  In April 2012, the LPSC Staff filed its findings, suggesting adjustments that will produce an 11.54% earned return on common equity for the test year and a $0.1 million rate reduction.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana accepted the LPSC Staff’s recommendations, and the rate reduction will be effective with the first billing cycle of May 2012.
26

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Filings with the MPSC

In March 2012, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2011 test year filing.  The filing shows an earned return on common equity of 10.92% for the test year, which is within the earnings bandwidth and results in no change in rates.  The filing is currently subject to MPSC review.

Filings with the PUCT and Texas Cities

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the rate case that Entergy Texas filed in November 2011 requesting a $112 million base rate increase reflecting a 10.6% return on common equity based on an adjusted June 2011 test year. On April 3, 2012 the PUCT Staff filed direct testimony recommending a base rate increase of $66 million and a 9.6% return on common equity.  The PUCT Staff, however, subsequently filed a statement of position in the proceeding indicating that it was still evaluating the position it will ultimately take in the case regarding the Entergy Texas’s recovery of purchased power capacity costs and Entergy Texas’s proposal to defer its MISO transition expenses.  On April 13, 2012, Entergy Texas filed rebuttal testimony indicating a revised request for a $105 million base rate increase.  A hearing was held in late-April through early-May 2012 and a decision is pending.
System Agreement Cost Equalization Proceedings

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the proceedings regarding the System Agreement, including the FERC’s October 2011 order, Entergy’s December 2011 compliance filing in response to that order, and Entergy Arkansas’s February 2012 filing for an interim adjustment to its production cost allocation rider requesting that the $156 million payment be collected from customers over the 22-month period from March 2012 through December 2013.  In March 2012 the APSC issued an order stating that the payment can be recovered from retail customers through the production cost allocation rider, subject to refund.  The LPSC and the APSC have requested rehearing of the FERC’s October 2011 order.  The APSC, LPSC, the PUCT, and other parties intervened in the December 2011 compliance filing proceeding, and the APSC and the LPSC also filed protests.
On May 7, 2012, the FERC issued orders in several System Agreement proceedings, including an order on rehearing in the 2007 rate filing based on 2006 production costs proceeding, an order on the ALJ’s initial decision in the 2009 rate filing based on 2008 production costs proceeding, and orders in other proceedings regarding the method of calculating the production costs used in the determination of the rough production cost equalization payments and receipts.  The May 7, 2012 FERC orders may result in the reallocation of costs among the Utility operating companies, although there are still FERC decisions pending in other System Agreement proceedings that could affect the rough production cost equalization payments and receipts, including for the 2007 rate filing.  The FERC directed Entergy, within 45 days of the issuance of a pending FERC order on rehearing regarding the functionalization of costs in the 2007 rate filing, to file a comprehensive bandwidth recalculation report showing updated payments and receipts in the 2007 rate filing proceeding.  In the order in the 2007 rate filing proceeding, the FERC also denied Entergy’s request for rehearing regarding the AmerenUE contract and ordered Entergy Arkansas to refund to AmerenUE the rough production cost equalization payments collected from AmerenUE.  Under the terms of the FERC’s order the refund is due in June 2012.  Entergy Arkansas had previously recorded a regulatory provision for the potential refund to AmerenUE.
Interruptible Load Proceeding

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the proceeding regarding the treatment under the System Agreement of the Utility operating companies’ interruptible loads.  Entergy Arkansas filed an application in November 2010 with the APSC for recovery of the refund that it paid.  The APSC denied Entergy Arkansas’s application, and also denied Entergy Arkansas’s petition for rehearing.  If the FERC were to order Entergy Arkansas to pay refunds on rehearing in the interruptible load proceeding the APSC’s decision would trap FERC-approved costs at Entergy Arkansas with no regulatory-approved mechanism to recover them.  In August 2011, Entergy Arkansas filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas asking for a declaratory judgment that the rejection of Entergy Arkansas’s application by the APSC is preempted by the Federal Power Act.  The APSC filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.  In April 2012 the United States district court dismissed Entergy Arkansas’s complaint without prejudice stating that Entergy Arkansas’s claim is not ripe for adjudication at this time.
27

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy Arkansas Opportunity Sales Proceeding

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this proceeding commenced at the FERC by the LPSC.

Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana

Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s Act 55 financing of its Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita storm costs.  In February 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana sold 500,000 of its Class A preferred membership units in Entergy Holdings Company LLC, a wholly-owned Entergy subsidiary, to a third party in exchange for $51 million plus accrued but unpaid distributions on the units.  The 500,000 preferred membership units are mandatorily redeemable in January 2112.

New Nuclear Generation Development Costs (Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana)

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana are developing a project option for new nuclear generation at River Bend.  In March 2010, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC seeking approval to continue the limited development activities necessary to preserve an option to construct a new unit at River Bend.  The testimony and legal briefs of the LPSC staff generally support the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, although other parties filed briefs, without supporting testimony, in opposition to the request.  At an evidentiary hearing in October 2011, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and the LPSC staff presented testimony in support of certification of activities to preserve an option for a new nuclear plant at River Bend.  The ALJ recommended, however, that the LPSC decline the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana on the basis that the LPSC’s rule on new nuclear development does not apply to activities to preserve an option to develop and on the further grounds that the companies improperly engaged in advanced preparation activities prior to certification.  There has been no suggestion that the planning activities or costs incurred were imprudent.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana have requested oral argument before the LPSC.

Texas Power Price Lawsuit

In August 2003, a lawsuit was filed in the district court of Chambers County, Texas by Texas residents on behalf of a purported class apparently of the Texas retail customers of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. who were billed and paid for electric power from January 1, 1994 to the present.  The named defendants include Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services, Entergy Power, Entergy Power Marketing Corp., and Entergy Arkansas.  Entergy Gulf States, Inc. was not a named defendant, but was alleged to be a co-conspirator.  The court granted the request of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. to intervene in the lawsuit to protect its interests.
Plaintiffs allege that the defendants implemented a “price gouging accounting scheme” to sell to plaintiffs and similarly situated utility customers higher priced power generated by the defendants while rejecting and/or reselling to off-system utilities less expensive power offered and/or purchased from off-system suppliers and/or generated by the Entergy system.  In particular, plaintiffs allege that the defendants manipulated and continue to manipulate the dispatch of generation so that power is purchased from affiliated expensive resources instead of buying cheaper off-system power.
Plaintiffs stated in their pleadings that customers in Texas were charged at least $57 million above prevailing market prices for power.  Plaintiffs seek actual, consequential and exemplary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, and disgorgement of profits.  The plaintiffs’ experts have tendered a report calculating damages in a large range, from $153 million to $972 million in present value, under various scenarios.  The Entergy defendants have tendered expert reports challenging the assumptions, methodologies, and conclusions of the plaintiffs’ expert reports.
28

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The case is pending in state district court, and in March 2012 the court found that the case met the requirements to be maintained as a class action under Texas law.  On April 30, 2012, the court entered an order certifying the class.


NOTE 3.  EQUITY  (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana)

Common Stock

Earnings per Share

The following tables present Entergy’s basic and diluted earnings per share calculations included on the consolidated income statement:

For the Three Months Ended March 31,
2012
2011
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
Basic earnings per share
Income
Shares
$/share
Income
Shares
$/share
Net income attributable to
Entergy Corporation
($151.7)
176.9
($0.86)
$248.7
178.8
$1.39
Average dilutive effect of:
Stock options
-
0.5
-
-
1.1
(0.01)
Restricted stock
-
-
-
-
0.2
-
Diluted earnings per share
($151.7)
177.4
($0.86)
$248.7
180.1
$1.38

Entergy’s stock options and other equity compensation plans are discussed in Note 5 herein, and in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
Treasury Stock

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Entergy Corporation issued 795,908 shares of its previously repurchased common stock to satisfy stock option exercises and other stock-based awards.  Entergy Corporation did not repurchase any of its common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2012.
29

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Retained Earnings

On April 4, 2012 Entergy Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.83 per share, payable on June 1, 2012 to holders of record as of May 10, 2012.
Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is included in the equity section of the balance sheets of Entergy, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana.  Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the balance sheets included the following components:

Entergy
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
(In Thousands)
Cash flow hedges net
unrealized gain
$322,932
$177,497
$-
$-
$-
$-
Pension and other
postretirement liabilities
(493,289)
(499,556)
(68,582)
(69,610)
(38,854)
(39,507)
Net unrealized investment
gains
201,045
150,939
-
-
-
-
Foreign currency translation
2,979
2,668
-
-
-
-
Total
$33,667
($168,452)
($68,582)
($69,610)
($38,854)
($39,507)

Other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are presented in Entergy’s, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s, and Entergy Louisiana’s Statements of Comprehensive Income.


NOTE 4.  REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES, LINES OF CREDIT, SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM DEBT (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion and expires in March 2017.  Entergy Corporation also has the ability to issue letters of credit against 50% of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility.  The commitment fee is currently 0.275% of the commitment amount.  Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation.  The weighted average interest rate for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was 2.14% on the drawn portion of the facility.  Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and capacity available under the facility as of March 31, 2012.

Capacity
Borrowings
Letters
of Credit
Capacity
Available
(In Millions)
$3,500
$1,465
$8
$2,027

Entergy Corporation’s facility requires it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.  Entergy is in compliance with this covenant.  If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy Corporation or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility maturity date may occur.


30

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy Texas each had credit facilities available as of March 31, 2012 as follows:

Company


Expiration
Date
Amount of
Facility
Interest Rate (a)
Amount Drawn
as of
March 31,
2012
Entergy Arkansas
April 2012
$78 million (b)
3.25%
-
Entergy Arkansas
March 2017
$150 million (c)
1.74%
-
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
March 2017
$150 million (d)
1.74%
-
Entergy Louisiana
March 2017
$200 million (e)
1.74%
-
Entergy Mississippi
May 2012
$35 million (f)
1.99%
-
Entergy Mississippi
May 2012
$25 million (f)
1.99%
-
Entergy Mississippi
May 2012
$10 million (f)
1.99%
-
Entergy Texas
March 2017
$150 million (g)
1.99%
-

(a)
The interest rate is the rate as of March 31, 2012 that would be applied to outstanding borrowings under the facility.
(b)
The credit facility requires Entergy Arkansas to maintain a debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.  Borrowings under the Entergy Arkansas credit facility may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable.  In April 2012, at the expiration of this facility, Entergy Arkansas entered into a new $20 million credit facility that expires in April 2013.
(c)
The credit facility allows Entergy Arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility.  As of March 31, 2012, no letters of credit were outstanding.  The credit facility requires Entergy Arkansas to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.
(d)
The credit facility allows Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility.  As of March 31, 2012, no letters of credit were outstanding.  The credit facility requires Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.
(e)
The credit facility allows Entergy Louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility.  As of March 31, 2012, no letters of credit were outstanding.  The credit facility requires Entergy Louisiana to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.
(f)
Borrowings under the Entergy Mississippi credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable.  Entergy Mississippi is required to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.  Prior to expiration on May 31, 2012, Entergy Mississippi expects to renew all of its credit facilities.
(g)
The credit facility allows Entergy Texas to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility.  As of March 31, 2012, no letters of credit were outstanding.  The credit facility requires Entergy Texas to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.

The facility fees on the credit facilities range from 0.125% to 0.275% of the commitment amount.


31

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The short-term borrowings of the Registrant Subsidiaries are limited to amounts authorized by the FERC.  The current FERC-authorized limits are effective through October 31, 2013.  In addition to borrowings from commercial banks, these companies are authorized under a FERC order to borrow from the Entergy System money pool.  The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ dependence on external short-term borrowings.  Borrowings from the money pool and external borrowings combined may not exceed the FERC-authorized limits.  The following are the FERC-authorized limits for short-term borrowings and the outstanding short-term borrowings as of March 31, 2012 (aggregating both money pool and external short-term borrowings) for the Registrant Subsidiaries:


Authorized
Borrowings
(In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas
$250
$49
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
$200
-
Entergy Louisiana
$250
-
Entergy Mississippi
$175
-
Entergy New Orleans
$100
$7
Entergy Texas
$200
-
System Energy
$200
-

Variable Interest Entities (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)

See Note 18 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the consolidation of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities (VIE).  The variable interest entities have credit facilities and also issue commercial paper to finance the acquisition and ownership of nuclear fuel as follows as of March 31, 2012:
Company
Expiration
Date
Amount
of
Facility
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate on
Borrowings
(a)
Amount
Outstanding
as of
March 31,
2012
(Dollars in Millions)
Entergy Arkansas VIE
July 2013
$85
2.45%
$12.5
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIE
July 2013
$85
2.37%
$16.7
Entergy Louisiana VIE
July 2013
$90
2.27%
$29.4
System Energy VIE
July 2013
$100
2.38%
$69.2

(a)
Includes letter of credit fees and bank fronting fees on commercial paper issuances by the VIEs for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy.  The VIE for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana does not issue commercial paper, but borrows directly on its bank credit facility.
The amount outstanding on Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s credit facility is included in long-term debt on its balance sheet and the commercial paper outstanding for the other VIEs is classified as a current liability on the respective balance sheets.  The commitment fees on the credit facilities are 0.20% of the undrawn commitment amount.  Each credit facility requires the respective lessee of nuclear fuel (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, or Entergy Corporation as guarantor for System Energy) to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 70% or less of its total capitalization.


32

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The variable interest entities had notes payable that are included in long-term debt on the respective balance sheets as of March 31, 2012 as follows:

Company
Description
Amount
Entergy Arkansas VIE
9% Series H due June 2013
$30 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE
5.69% Series I due July 2014
$70 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE
3.23% Series J due July 2016
$55 million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIE
5.56% Series N due May 2013
$75 million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIE
5.41% Series O due July 2012
$60 million
Entergy Louisiana VIE
5.69% Series E due July 2014
$50 million
Entergy Louisiana VIE
3.30% Series F due March 2016
$20 million
System Energy VIE
6.29% Series F due September 2013
$70 million
System Energy VIE
5.33% Series G due April 2015
$60 million
System Energy VIE
4.02% Series H due February 2017
$50 million

In accordance with regulatory treatment, interest on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities, commercial paper, and long-term notes payable is reported in fuel expense.

Debt Issuances and Redemptions

(Entergy Corporation)

In January 2012, Entergy Corporation issued $500 million of 4.70% senior notes due January 2017.  Entergy Corporation used the proceeds to repay borrowings under its $3.5 billion credit facility.  The net repayment of Entergy’s credit facility during the first quarter 2012 was $455 million.

(Entergy Gulf States)

In April 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana redeemed, prior to maturity, its $10.84 million 5.8% Series pollution control revenue bonds due April 2016.

(Entergy Louisiana)

In January 2012, Entergy Louisiana issued $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds due December 2014.  Entergy Louisiana used a portion of the proceeds to repay short-term borrowings under the Entergy System money pool.

Fair Value

The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012 are as follows:

Book Value
of Long-Term Debt
Fair Value
of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
(In Thousands)
Entergy
$12,436,380
$12,565,095
Entergy Arkansas
$1,875,944
$1,766,405
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
$1,529,790
$1,635,476
Entergy Louisiana
$2,432,660
$2,477,368
Entergy Mississippi
$920,454
$990,325
Entergy New Orleans
$166,515
$171,863
Entergy Texas
$1,655,569
$1,865,069
System Energy
$757,175
$633,607
33

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


(a)
The values exclude lease obligations of $169 million at Entergy Louisiana and $139 million at System Energy, long-term DOE obligations of $181 million at Entergy Arkansas, and the note payable to NYPA of $134 million at Entergy, and include debt due within one year.
(b)
Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades.


NOTE 5.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Entergy Corporation)

Entergy grants stock awards, which are described more fully in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.  Awards under Entergy’s plans generally vest over three years.

Stock Options

Entergy granted 552,400 stock options during the first quarter 2012 with a weighted-average fair value of $9.42.  At March 31, 2012, there are 10,174,958 stock options outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $77.47.  The intrinsic value, which has no effect on net income, of the outstanding stock options is calculated by the difference in the weighted average exercise price of the stock options granted and Entergy Corporation’s common stock price as of March 31, 2012.  Because Entergy’s stock price at March 31, 2012 is less than the weighted average exercise price, the aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2012 is zero.  The intrinsic value of “in the money” stock options is $25.4 million as of March 31, 2012.

The following table includes financial information for stock options for the first quarter for each of the years presented:

2012
2011
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income for the first quarter
$2.1
$3.0
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income for the first quarter
$0.8
$1.2
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory as of March 31,
$0.4
$0.6

Restricted Stock Awards

In January 2012, the Board approved and Entergy granted 339,700 restricted stock awards under the 2007 Equity Ownership and Long-term Cash Incentive Plan.  The grants were made effective as of January 26, 2012 and were valued at $71.30 per share, which was the closing price of Entergy’s common stock on that date.  One-third of the restricted stock awards will vest upon each anniversary of the grant date and are expensed ratably over the three year vesting period.  Shares of restricted stock have the same dividend and voting rights as other common stock and are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting.

The following table includes financial information for restricted stock for the first quarter for each of the years presented:

2012
2011
(In Millions)
Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income for the first quarter
$2.9
$1.0
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income for the first quarter
$1.1
$0.4
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory as of March 31,
$0.5
$0.2

34

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



NOTE 6.  RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Components of Net Pension Cost

Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$37,691
$30,490
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
65,232
59,248
Expected return on assets
(79,356)
(75,319)
Amortization of prior service cost
683
838
Amortization of loss
41,820
23,244
Net pension costs
$66,070
$38,501

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

2012
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$5,542
$3,068
$3,669
$1,602
$706
$1,421
$1,480
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation
13,922
6,420
8,800
4,070
1,902
4,206
3,247
Expected return on assets
(16,441)
(8,593)
(10,209)
(5,236)
(2,215)
(5,581)
(4,109)
Amortization of prior service
cost
50
5
52
7
2
4
3
Amortization of loss
10,193
4,043
7,050
2,633
1,719
2,544
2,251
Net pension cost
$13,266
$4,943
$9,362
$3,076
$2,114
$2,594
$2,872


35

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements




2011
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$4,518
$2,462
$2,886
$1,327
$561
$1,197
$1,235
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation
12,991
5,928
8,159
3,909
1,762
3,993
2,939
Expected return on assets
(15,609)
(8,339)
(9,716)
(5,038)
(2,114)
(5,501)
(3,784)
Amortization of prior service
cost
115
20
70
38
9
16
4
Amortization of loss
6,421
2,279
4,497
1,680
1,166
1,394
1,321
Net pension cost
$8,436
$2,350
$5,896
$1,916
$1,384
$1,099
$1,715

Entergy recognized $5.1 million and $4.9 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans in the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their non-qualified pension plans in the first quarters of 2012 and 2011:

Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
(In Thousands)
Non-qualified pension cost
first quarter 2012
$107
$39
$3
$46
$19
$163
Non-qualified pension cost
first quarter 2011
$115
$42
$4
$48
$16
$192

Components of Net Other Postretirement Benefit Cost

Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned during the period
$17,221
$14,835
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation (APBO)
20,640
18,631
Expected return on assets
(8,626)
(7,369)
Amortization of transition obligation
794
796
Amortization of prior service cost
(4,541)
(3,518)
Amortization of loss
9,113
5,298
Net other postretirement benefit cost
$34,601
$28,673


36

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

2012
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$2,272
$1,880
$1,949
$773
$422
$913
$823
Interest cost on APBO
3,613
2,398
2,445
1,179
856
1,663
757
Expected return on assets
(3,507)
-
-
(1,130)
(928)
(2,104)
(650)
Amortization of transition
obligation
205
60
96
88
297
47
2
Amortization of prior service
cost
(133)
(206)
(62)
(35)
10
(107)
(16)
Amortization of loss
2,077
1,184
1,090
730
390
1,079
493
Net other postretirement
benefit cost
$4,527
$5,316
$5,518
$1,605
$1,047
$1,491
$1,409

2011
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period
$2,013
$1,540
$1,635
$658
$362
$769
$661
Interest cost on APBO
3,436
2,075
2,192
1,093
806
1,486
667
Expected return on assets
(2,882)
-
-
(977)
(800)
(1,874)
(529)
Amortization of transition
obligation
205
60
96
88
298
47
2
Amortization of prior service
cost
(133)
(206)
(62)
(35)
10
(107)
(147)
Amortization of loss
1,610
723
698
540
241
700
369
Net other postretirement
benefit cost
$4,249
$4,192
$4,559
$1,367
$917
$1,021
$1,023

Employer Contributions

Based on current assumptions, Entergy expects to contribute $246.1 million to its qualified pension plans in 2012.  As of the end of March 2012, Entergy had contributed $40.1 million to its pension plans.  Therefore, Entergy presently anticipates contributing an additional $206 million to fund its qualified pension plans in 2012.


37

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Based on current assumptions, the Registrant Subsidiaries expect to contribute the following to qualified pension plans in 2012:

Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy
Mississippi
Entergy
New Orleans
Entergy
Texas
System
Energy
(In Thousands)
Expected 2012 pension
contributions
$54,301
$19,763
$38,813
$13,854
$7,815
$12,829
$13,496
Pension contributions made
through March 2012
$9,094
$3,042
$8,863
$2,564
$1,803
$2,488
$3,017
Remaining estimated pension
contributions to be made in 2012
$45,207
$16,721
$29,950
$11,290
$6,012
$10,341
$10,479


NOTE 7.  BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Entergy Corporation

Entergy’s reportable segments as of March 31, 2012 are Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.  Utility includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, and natural gas utility service in portions of Louisiana.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities includes the ownership and operation of six nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities also includes the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers.  “All Other” includes the parent company, Entergy Corporation, and other business activity, including the earnings on the proceeds of sales of previously-owned businesses.

Entergy’s segment financial information for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Utility
Entergy
Wholesale
Commodities*
All Other
Eliminations
Entergy
(In Thousands)
2012
Operating revenues
$1,831,640
$560,251
$959
($9,191)
$2,383,659
Income taxes (benefit)
$99,707
($90,407)
($9,462)
$-
($162)
Consolidated net income (loss)
$67,212
($168,512)
($18,405)
($27,035)
($146,740)
2011
Operating revenues
$1,937,618
$610,146
$1,101
($7,657)
$2,541,208
Income taxes (benefit)
$90,204
$84,941
($10,895)
$-
$164,250
Consolidated net income (loss)
$168,653
$123,233
($10,563)
($27,645)
$253,678

Businesses marked with * are sometimes referred to as the “competitive businesses.”  Eliminations are primarily intersegment activity.


38

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Registrant Subsidiaries

Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries has one reportable segment, which is an integrated utility business, except for System Energy, which is an electricity generation business.  Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations is managed on an integrated basis by that company because of the substantial effect of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business process, cost structures, and operating results.

NOTE 8.  RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Market and Commodity Risks

In the normal course of business, Entergy is exposed to a number of market and commodity risks.  Market risk is the potential loss that Entergy may incur as a result of changes in the market or fair value of a particular instrument or commodity.  All financial and commodity-related instruments, including derivatives, are subject to market risk.  Entergy is subject to a number of commodity and market risks, including:

Type of Risk
Affected Businesses
Power price risk
Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Fuel price risk
Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Equity price and interest rate risk - investments
Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Entergy manages a portion of these risks using derivative instruments, some of which are classified as cash flow hedges due to their financial settlement provisions while others are classified as normal purchase/normal sales transactions due to their physical settlement provisions.  Normal purchase/normal sale risk management tools include power purchase and sales agreements, fuel purchase agreements, capacity contracts, and tolling agreements.  Financially-settled cash flow hedges can include natural gas and electricity swaps and options, and interest rate swaps.  Entergy will occasionally enter into financially settled swap and option contracts to manage market risk under certain hedging transactions which may or may not be designated as hedging instruments. Entergy enters into derivatives only to manage natural risks inherent in its physical or financial assets or liabilities.

Entergy manages fuel price volatility for its Louisiana jurisdictions (Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans) and Entergy Mississippi primarily through the purchase of short-term natural gas swaps.  These swaps are marked-to-market with offsetting regulatory assets or liabilities.  The notional volumes of these swaps are based on a portion of projected annual exposure to gas for electric generation and projected winter purchases for gas distribution at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans.

Entergy’s exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including the size, term, composition, and diversification of positions held, as well as market volatility and liquidity.  For instruments such as options, the time period during which the option may be exercised and the relationship between the current market price of the underlying instrument and the option’s contractual strike or exercise price also affects the level of market risk.  A significant factor influencing the overall level of market risk to which Entergy is exposed is its use of hedging techniques to mitigate such risk.  Entergy manages market risk by actively monitoring compliance with stated risk management policies as well as monitoring the effectiveness of its hedging policies and strategies.  Entergy’s risk management policies limit the amount of total net exposure and rolling net exposure during the stated periods.  These policies, including related risk limits, are regularly assessed to ensure their appropriateness given Entergy’s objectives.


39

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Derivatives

The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2012 are as follows:

Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Offset (a)
Business
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$332 million
($46) million
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
$196 million
($-)
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$65 million
($19) million
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities (current portion)
$65 million
($65) million
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$45 million
($-)
Utility
The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:

Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Offset (a)
Business
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$197 million
($25) million
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options
Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
$112 million
($1) million
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion)
$1 million
($1) million
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
40

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value (a)
Offset (a)
Business
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Assets:
Electricity swaps and options
Prepayments and other (current portion)
$37 million
($8) million
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options
Other current liabilities (current portion)
$33 million
($33) million
Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$30 million
($-)
Utility
(a)
The balances of derivative assets and liabilities in these tables are presented gross.  Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the Entergy Consolidated Balance Sheets on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for Derivatives and Hedging.

The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

Instrument
Amount of gain (loss)
recognized in AOCI
(effective portion)
Income Statement location
Amount of gain
reclassified from
accumulated OCI into
income (effective portion)
2012
Electricity swaps and options
$291 million
Competitive businesses operating revenues
$71 million
2011
Electricity swaps and options
($74) million
Competitive businesses operating revenues
$29 million

Electricity over-the-counter instruments that financially settle against day-ahead power pool prices are used to manage price exposure for Entergy Wholesale Commodities generation.  Based on market prices as of March 31, 2012, cash flow hedges relating to power sales totaled $528 million of net unrealized gains.  Approximately $332 million is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) to operating revenues in the next twelve months.  The actual amount reclassified from accumulated OCI, however, could vary due to future changes in market prices.  Gains totaling approximately $71 million and $29 million were realized on the maturity of cash flow hedges, before taxes of $25 million and $10 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Unrealized gains or losses recorded in OCI result from hedging power output at the Entergy Wholesale Commodities power plants.  The related gains or losses from hedging power are included in operating revenues when realized.  The maximum length of time over which Entergy is currently hedging the variability in future cash flows with derivatives for forecasted power transactions at March 31, 2012 is approximately 2.75 years.  Planned generation currently sold forward from Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants is 89% for the remaining three quarters of 2012, of which approximately 44% is sold under financial derivatives and the remainder under normal purchase/sale contracts.  The change in the value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was insignificant.  The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges is recorded in competitive business operating revenues.  Certain of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy
41

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Wholesale Commodities power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide collateral to secure its obligations when the current market prices exceed the contracted power prices.  The primary form of collateral to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty.  As of March 31, 2012, there were no hedge contracts with counterparties in a liability position.  Entergy may effectively liquidate a cash flow hedge instrument by entering into a contract offsetting the original hedge, and then de-designating the original hedge in this situation.  Gains or losses accumulated in OCI prior to de-designation continue to be deferred in OCI until they are included in income as the original hedged transaction occurs. From the point of de-designation, the gains or losses on the original hedge and the offsetting contract are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and offset as they flow through to earnings.

Natural gas over-the-counter swaps that financially settle against NYMEX futures are used to manage fuel price volatility for the Utility’s Louisiana and Mississippi customers.  All benefits or costs of the program are recorded in fuel costs.  The total volume of natural gas swaps outstanding as of March 31, 2012 is 56,330,000 MMBtu for Entergy, 16,610,000 MMBtu for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, 23,700,000 MMBtu for Entergy Louisiana, and 16,020,000 MMBtu for Entergy Mississippi.  Credit support for these natural gas swaps is covered by master agreements that do not require collateralization based on mark-to-market value, but do carry adequate assurance language that may lead to collateralization requests.

The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Instrument
Amount of gain
recognized in AOCI
Income Statement location
Amount of gain (loss)
recorded in income
2012
Natural gas swaps
$-
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($51) million
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items
$3 million
Competitive business operating revenues
($2) million
2011
Natural gas swaps
$-
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($3) million
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items
$10 million
Competitive business operating revenues
$2 million

Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability.  The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.
42

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments on their balance sheets as of March 31, 2012 are as follows:

Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value
Registrant
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Liabilities:
Natural gas swaps
Gas hedge contracts
$13.5 million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Gas hedge contracts
$19.1 million
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$12.8 million
Entergy Mississippi

The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments on their balance sheets as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:

Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value
Registrant
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Liabilities:
Natural gas swaps
Gas hedge contracts
$8.6 million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Gas hedge contracts
$12.4 million
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$7.8 million
Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps
Other current liabilities
$1.5 million
Entergy New Orleans


The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

Instrument
Statement of Income Location
Amount of gain
(loss) recorded
in income
Registrant
2012
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($15.0) million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($20.7) million
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($13.4) million
Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($1.5) million
Entergy New Orleans
2011
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($1.9) million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($1.1) million
Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
$0.3 million
Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
($0.8) million
Entergy New Orleans
43

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Fair Values

The estimated fair values of Entergy’s financial instruments and derivatives are determined using bid prices, market quotes, and financial modeling.  Considerable judgment is required in developing the estimates of fair value.  Therefore, estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Entergy could realize in a current market exchange.  Gains or losses realized on financial instruments other than electricity swap and option contracts held by competitive businesses are reflected in future rates and therefore do not accrue to the benefit or detriment of shareholders.  Entergy considers the carrying amounts of most financial instruments classified as current assets and liabilities to be a reasonable estimate of their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Accounting standards define fair value as an exit price, or the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between knowledgeable market participants at the date of measurement.  Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries use assumptions or market input data that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities at fair value.  The inputs can be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable.  Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries endeavor to use the best available information to determine fair value.

Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy establishes the highest priority for unadjusted market quotes in an active market for the identical asset or liability and the lowest priority for unobservable inputs.  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

·
Level 1 - Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.  Level 1 primarily consists of individually owned common stocks, cash equivalents, debt instruments, and gas hedge contracts.
·
Level 2 - Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are, either directly or indirectly, observable for the asset or liability at the measurement date.  Assets are valued based on prices derived by independent third parties that use inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, and issuer spreads.  Prices are reviewed and can be challenged with the independent parties and/or overridden by Entergy if it is believed such would be more reflective of fair value.  Level 2 inputs include the following:

-
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
-
quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
-
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or
-
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 2 consists primarily of individually owned debt instruments or shares in common trusts.  Common trust funds are stated at estimated fair value based on the fair market value of the underlying investments.

·
Level 3 - Level 3 inputs are pricing inputs that are generally less observable or unobservable from objective sources.  These inputs are used with internally developed methodologies to produce management’s best estimate of fair value for the asset or liability.  Level 3 consists primarily of derivative power contracts used as cash flow hedges of power sales at merchant power plants.

The values for power contract assets or liabilities are based on both observable inputs including public market prices and interest rates, and unobservable inputs such as implied volatilities, unit contingent discounts, expected basis differences, and credit adjusted counterparty interest rates.  They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities.  The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control group and sent to the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Back Office and Entergy Nuclear Finance groups for evaluation.  The primary functions of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control Group include: gathering, validating and reporting market data, providing market and credit risk analyses and valuations in support of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ commercial transactions, developing and administering protocols for the management of
44

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


market and credit risks, implementing and maintaining controls around changes to market data in the energy trading and risk management system, reviewing creditworthiness of counterparties, supporting contract negotiations with new counterparties, administering credit support for contracts, and managing the daily margining process.  The primary functions of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Back Office are managing the energy trading and risk management system, forecasting revenues, forward positions and analysis, performing contract administration, market and counterparty settlements and revenue reporting and analysis along with maintaining related controls for Entergy Wholesale Commodities.  Both Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Back Office report to the Entergy Wholesale Commodities VP, Finance & Risk Group.  Entergy Nuclear Finance is primarily responsible for the financial planning of Entergy’s regulated and unregulated nuclear businesses and has a significant role in accounting for the activities and transactions of the associated companies.  The VP of Finance within Entergy Nuclear Finance reports to the Chief Accounting Officer.

The amounts reflected as the fair value of electricity swaps are based on the estimated amount that the contracts are in-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as an asset) or out-of-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as a liability) and would equal the estimated amount receivable or payable by Entergy if the contracts were settled at that date.  These derivative contracts include cash flow hedges that swap fixed for floating cash flows for sales of the output from Entergy’s Entergy Wholesale Commodities business.  The fair values are based on the mark-to-market comparison between the fixed contract prices and the floating prices determined each period from quoted forward power market prices.  The differences between the fixed price in the swap contract and these market-related prices multiplied by the volume specified in the contract and discounted at the counterparties’ credit adjusted risk free rate are recorded as derivative contract assets or liabilities.  For contracts that have unit contingent terms, a further discount is applied based on the historical relationship between contract and market prices for similar contract terms.
The amounts reflected as the fair value of electricity options are valued based on a Black Scholes model, and are calculated at the end of each month for accounting purposes.  Inputs to the valuation  include end of day forward market prices for the period when the transactions will settle, implied volatilities based on market volatilities provided by a third party data aggregator, and US Treasury rates for a risk-free return rate.  As described further below, prices and implied volatilities are reviewed and can be adjusted if it is determined that there is a better representation of fair value.  As of March 31, 2012, Entergy had in-the-money derivative contracts with a fair value of $528 million with counterparties or their guarantor who are all currently investment grade.  As of March 31, 2012 there are no out-of-the-money contracts supported by corporate guarantees, which would require additional cash or letters of credit in the event of a decrease in Entergy Corporation’s credit rating to below investment grade.

On a daily basis, Entergy Wholesale Commodities calculates the mark-to-market for all derivative transactions.  Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control Group also validates forward market prices by comparing them to settlement prices of actual market transactions.  Significant differences are analyzed and potentially adjusted based on actual transaction clearing prices, or a methodology that considers natural gas prices and market heat rates.  Implied volatilities used to value options are also validated using actual counterparty quotes for Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions.  Moreover, on at least a monthly basis the Office of Corporate Risk Oversight confirms the mark to market calculations and prepares price scenarios and credit downgrade scenario analysis.  The scenario analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and within Entergy Wholesale Commodities.  Finally, for all proposed derivative transactions an analysis is completed to assess the risk of adding the proposed derivative to Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ portfolio.  In particular, the credit, liquidity and financial metrics impacts are calculated for this analysis.  This analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.
45

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, Entergy’s assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.


2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$622
$-
$-
$622
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
428
1,942
-
2,370
Debt securities
670
999
-
1,669
Power contracts
-
-
528
528
Securitization recovery trust account
49
-
-
49
Storm reserve escrow account
336
-
-
336
$2,105
$2,941
$528
$5,574
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$45
$-
$-
$45


2011
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$613
$-
$-
$613
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
397
1,732
-
2,129
Debt securities
639
1,020
-
1,659
Power contracts
-
-
312
312
Securitization recovery trust account
50
-
-
50
Storm reserve escrow account
335
-
-
335
$2,034
$2,752
$312
$5,098
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$30
$-
$-
$30

(a)
The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indexes.  Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities.  See Note 9 for additional information on the investment portfolios.
46

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets (liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

2012
2011
(In Millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$312
$197
Unrealized gains/(losses) from price changes
286
(62)
Unrealized gains/(losses) on originations
1
(2)
Realized gains on settlements
(71)
(29)
Balance as of March 31,
$528
$104

The following table sets forth a description of the types of transactions classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, and the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs to each which cause that classification, as of March 31, 2012:

Transaction Type
FV as of
March 31, 2012
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
Range
from
Average
%
Effect on
Fair Value
Electricity swaps
$435 million
Unit contingent discount
+/-3%
$20 million
Electricity options
$93 million
Implied volatility
+/-11%
$19 million

The following table sets forth an analysis of each of the types of unobservable inputs impacting the fair value of items classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, and the sensitivity to changes to those inputs:

Significant
Unobservable
Input
Transaction Type
Position
Change to Input
Effect on FMV
Unit contingent discount
Electricity swaps
Sell
Increase (Decrease)
Decrease (Increase)
Implied volatility
Electricity options
Sell
Increase (Decrease)
Increase (Decrease)
Implied volatility
Electricity options
Buy
Increase (Decrease)
Increase (Decrease)

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ assets that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
47

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Entergy Arkansas

2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
$2.1
$365.1
$-
$367.2
Debt securities
90.3
127.0
-
217.3
Securitization recovery trust account
7.9
-
-
7.9
$100.3
$492.1
$-
$592.4

2011
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$17.9
$-
$-
$17.9
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
6.3
323.1
-
329.4
Debt securities
82.8
129.5
-
212.3
Securitization recovery trust account
3.9
-
-
3.9
$110.9
$452.6
$-
$563.5

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana

2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$128.9
$-
$-
$128.9
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
5.2
270.8
-
276.0
Debt securities
39.0
140.4
-
179.4
Storm reserve escrow account
90.2
-
-
90.2
$263.3
$411.2
$-
$674.5
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$13.5
$-
$-
$13.5

2011
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$24.6
$-
$-
$24.6
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
5.1
233.6
-
238.7
Debt securities
39.5
142.7
-
182.2
Storm reserve escrow account
90.2
-
-
90.2
$159.4
$376.3
$-
$535.7
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$8.6
$-
$-
$8.6
48

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Entergy Louisiana

2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$23.5
$-
$-
$23.5
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
0.8
167.0
-
167.8
Debt securities
53.4
53.3
-
106.7
Securitization recovery trust account
11.9
-
-
11.9
Storm reserve escrow account
200.5
-
-
200.5
$290.1
$220.3
$-
$510.4
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$19.1
$-
$-
$19.1


2011
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
$2.9
$146.3
$-
$149.2
Debt securities
51.6
53.2
-
104.8
Securitization recovery trust account
5.2
-
-
5.2
Storm reserve escrow account
201.2
-
-
201.2
$260.9
$199.5
$-
$460.4
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$12.4
$-
$-
$12.4

Entergy Mississippi

2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$14.0
$-
$-
$14.0
Storm reserve escrow account
31.9
-
-
31.9
$45.9
$-
$-
$45.9
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$12.8
$-
$-
$12.8

2011
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Storm reserve escrow account
$31.8
$-
$-
$31.8
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$7.8
$-
$-
$7.8
49

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Entergy New Orleans

2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Storm reserve escrow account
$13.4
$-
$-
$13.4

2011
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$9.3
$-
$-
$9.3
Storm reserve escrow account
12.0
-
-
12.0
$21.3
$-
$-
$21.3
Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts
$1.5
$-
$-
$1.5
Entergy Texas

2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets :
Temporary cash investments
$98.2
$-
$-
$98.2
Securitization recovery trust account
29.6
-
-
29.6
$127.8
$-
$-
$127.8

2011
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets :
Temporary cash investments
$65.1
$-
$-
$65.1
Securitization recovery trust account
41.2
-
-
41.2
$106.3
$-
$-
$106.3

System Energy

2012
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$82.6
$-
$-
$82.6
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
2.7
268.0
-
270.7
Debt securities
125.5
63.7
-
189.2
$210.8
$331.7
$-
$542.5

2011
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments
$154.2
$-
$-
$154.2
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities
2.7
234.5
-
237.2
Debt securities
123.2
63.0
-
186.2
$280.1
$297.5
$-
$577.6
50

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



(a)
The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices.  Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities.  See Note 9 for additional information on the investment portfolios.


NOTE 9.  DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUNDS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)

Entergy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The NRC requires Entergy subsidiaries to maintain trusts to fund the costs of decommissioning ANO 1, ANO 2, River Bend, Waterford 3, Grand Gulf, Pilgrim, Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades (NYPA currently retains the decommissioning trusts and liabilities for Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick).  The funds are invested primarily in equity securities; fixed-rate, fixed-income securities; and cash and cash equivalents.
Entergy records decommissioning trust funds on the balance sheet at their fair value.  Because of the ability of the Registrant Subsidiaries to recover decommissioning costs in rates and in accordance with the regulatory treatment for decommissioning trust funds, the Registrant Subsidiaries have recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities in other regulatory liabilities/assets.  For the nonregulated portion of River Bend, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) in other deferred credits.  Decommissioning trust funds for Pilgrim, Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment.  Accordingly, unrealized gains recorded on the assets in these trust funds are recognized in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity because these assets are classified as available for sale.  Unrealized losses (where cost exceeds fair market value) on the assets in these trust funds are also recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity unless the unrealized loss is other than temporary and therefore recorded in earnings.  Generally, Entergy records realized gains and losses on its debt and equity securities using the specific identification method to determine the cost basis of its securities.

The securities held as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities
$2,370
$633
$1
Debt Securities
1,669
101
6
Total
$4,039
$734
$7
2011
Equity Securities
$2,129
$423
$14
Debt Securities
1,659
115
5
Total
$3,788
$538
$19
51

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Deferred taxes on unrealized gains/(losses) are recorded in other comprehensive income for the decommissioning trusts which do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment as described above.  Unrealized gains/(losses) above are reported before deferred taxes of $199 million and $149 million as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  The amortized cost of debt securities was $1,589 million as of March 31, 2012 and $1,530 million as of December 31, 2011.  As of March 31, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 4.06%, an average duration of approximately 5.30 years, and an average maturity of approximately 8.43 years.  The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate or somewhat exceed the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index or the Russell 3000 Index.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of March 31, 2012:

Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$12
$-
$284
$3
More than 12 months
24
1
56
3
Total
$36
$1
$340
$6

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2011:

Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$130
$9
$123
$3
More than 12 months
43
5
60
2
Total
$173
$14
$183
$5

The unrealized losses in excess of twelve months on equity securities above relate to Entergy’s Utility operating companies and System Energy.

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

2012
2011
(In Millions)
Less than 1 year
$54
$69
1 year - 5 years
618
566
5 years - 10 years
568
583
10 years - 15 years
197
187
15 years - 20 years
42
42
20 years+
190
212
Total
$1,669
$1,659
52

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $536 million and $493 million, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $12 million and $4 million, respectively, and gross losses of $2 million and $5 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

Entergy Arkansas

Entergy Arkansas holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The securities held as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities
$367.2
$110.7
$-
Debt Securities
217.3
12.5
0.5
Total
$584.5
$123.2
$0.5
2011
Equity Securities
$329.4
$70.9
$0.4
Debt Securities
212.3
15.2
0.4
Total
$541.7
$86.1
$0.8

The amortized cost of debt securities was $205.3 million as of March 31, 2012 and $197.5 million as of December 31, 2011.  As of March 31, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 3.48%, an average duration of approximately 4.94 years, and an average maturity of approximately 5.72 years.  The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of March 31, 2012:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$0.1
$-
$46.9
$0.5
More than 12 months
-
-
1.0
-
Total
$0.1
$-
$47.9
$0.5
53

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2011:

Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$13.7
$0.4
$14.3
$0.4
More than 12 months
-
-
1.0
-
Total
$13.7
$0.4
$15.3
$0.4

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

2012
2011
(In Millions)
Less than 1 year
$17.8
$7.8
1 year - 5 years
83.2
86.5
5 years - 10 years
104.7
109.1
10 years - 15 years
3.7
2.7
15 years - 20 years
-
-
20 years+
7.9
6.2
Total
$217.3
$212.3

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $54.7 million and $31.0 million, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $2.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, gross losses were insignificant.

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The securities held as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities
$276.0
$69.2
$0.1
Debt Securities
179.4
13.9
0.2
Total
$455.4
$83.1
$0.3
2011
Equity Securities
$238.7
$40.9
$0.8
Debt Securities
182.2
15.2
0.3
Total
$420.9
$56.1
$1.1
54

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The amortized cost of debt securities was $168.0 million as of March 31, 2012 and $166.9 million as of December 31, 2011.  As of March 31, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 4.80%, an average duration of approximately 5.82 years, and an average maturity of approximately 9.03 years.  The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of March 31, 2012:

Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$0.3
$-
$19.3
$0.2
More than 12 months
1.6
0.1
-
-
Total
$1.9
$0.1
$19.3
$0.2

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2011:

Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$14.0
$0.5
$9.3
$0.2
More than 12 months
2.7
0.3
1.1
0.1
Total
$16.7
$0.8
$10.4
$0.3

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

2012
2011
(In Millions)
Less than 1 year
$3.9
$7.1
1 year - 5 years
46.4
40.8
5 years - 10 years
50.7
53.5
10 years - 15 years
66.2
62.9
15 years - 20 years
3.5
3.2
20 years+
8.7
14.7
Total
$179.4
$182.2
55

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $38.1 million and $11.9 million, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $1.5 million and $0.02 million, respectively, and gross losses of $5.5 thousand and $0.04 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

Entergy Louisiana

Entergy Louisiana holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The securities held as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities
$167.8
$46.4
$0.1
Debt Securities
106.7
8.1
0.4
Total
$274.5
$54.5
$0.5
2011
Equity Securities
$149.2
$29.7
$1.6
Debt Securities
104.8
8.8
0.2
Total
$254.0
$38.5
$1.8

The amortized cost of debt securities was $99.1 million as of March 31, 2012 and $91.9 million as of December 31, 2011.  As of March 31, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 3.80%, an average duration of approximately 5.19 years, and an average maturity of approximately 9.27 years.  The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of March 31, 2012:
Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$-
$-
$10.6
$0.4
More than 12 months
6.5
0.1
0.3
-
Total
$6.5
$0.1
$10.9
$0.4
56

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2011:

Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$11.6
$0.3
$5.5
$0.2
More than 12 months
10.0
1.3
0.2
-
Total
$21.6
$1.6
$5.7
$0.2

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

2012
2011
(In Millions)
Less than 1 year
$3.9
$3.9
1 year - 5 years
39.7
39.8
5 years - 10 years
23.6
22.2
10 years - 15 years
18.8
18.9
15 years - 20 years
2.1
2.2
20 years+
18.6
17.8
Total
$106.7
$104.8

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $6.8 million and $6.1 million, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $0.03 million and $0.06 million, respectively, and gross losses of $2.8 thousand and $0.01 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

System Energy

System Energy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts.  The securities held as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Gains
Total
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities
$270.7
$59.5
$0.4
Debt Securities
189.2
7.6
0.3
Total
$459.9
$67.1
$0.7
2011
Equity Securities
$237.2
$35.4
$5.4
Debt Securities
186.2
9.5
0.1
Total
$423.4
$44.9
$5.5
57

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



The amortized cost of debt securities was $184.2 million as of March 31, 2012 and $175.1 million as of December 31, 2011.  As of March 31, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 3.28%, an average duration of approximately 4.77 years, and an average maturity of approximately 6.78 years.  The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of March 31, 2012:

Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$-
$-
$39.1
$0.3
More than 12 months
15.8
0.4
0.3
-
Total
$15.8
$0.4
$39.4
$0.3

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of December 31, 2011:

Equity Securities
Debt Securities
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Millions)
Less than 12 months
$41.3
$1.8
$10.5
$0.1
More than 12 months
30.0
3.6
-
-
Total
$71.3
$5.4
$10.5
$0.1

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

2012
2011
(In Millions)
Less than 1 year
$3.8
$10.2
1 year - 5 years
108.2
94.6
5 years - 10 years
54.9
57.9
10 years - 15 years
2.2
2.6
15 years - 20 years
2.2
2.9
20 years+
17.9
18.0
Total
$189.2
$186.2
58

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $125.4 million and $88.6 million, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $1.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

Other-than-temporary impairments and unrealized gains and losses

Entergy, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy evaluate unrealized losses at the end of each period to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred.  The assessment of whether an investment in a debt security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on whether Entergy has the intent to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized costs.  Further, if Entergy does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred and it is measured by the present value of cash flows expected to be collected less the amortized cost basis (credit loss).  Entergy did not have any material other-than-temporary impairments relating to credit losses on debt securities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.  The assessment of whether an investment in an equity security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment continues to be based on a number of factors including, first, whether Entergy has the ability and intent to hold the investment to recover its value, the duration and severity of any losses, and, then, whether it is expected that the investment will recover its value within a reasonable period of time.  Entergy’s trusts are managed by third parties who operate in accordance with agreements that define investment guidelines and place restrictions on the purchases and sales of investments.  Entergy did not record material charges to other income in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, resulting from the recognition of the other-than-temporary impairment of certain equity securities held in its decommissioning trust funds.


NOTE 10.  INCOME TAXES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

See Income Tax Litigation , Income Tax Audits , and Other Tax Matters in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of income tax proceedings, income tax audits, and other income tax matters involving Entergy.  There are no material updates to the information discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.


NOTE 11.  PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Construction Expenditures in Accounts Payable

Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at March 31, 2012 are $194.0 million for Entergy, $19.5 million for Entergy Arkansas, $15.2 million for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, $22.2 million for Entergy Louisiana, $1.2 million for Entergy Mississippi, $0.2 million for Entergy New Orleans, $5.5 million for Entergy Texas, and $80.6 million for System Energy.

Vermont Yankee

In March 2011 the NRC renewed Vermont Yankee’s operating license for an additional 20 years.  The renewed operating license expires in March 2032.  In May 2011 the Vermont Department of Public Service and the New England Coalition petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit seeking judicial review of the NRC’s issuance of the renewed operating license, alleging that the license had been issued without a valid and effective water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.  Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. intervened in the proceeding. Briefing has been completed, and oral argument is scheduled for May 9, 2012.
59

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Vermont Yankee also is operating under a Certificate of Public Good from the State of Vermont that was scheduled to expire in March 2012, but has an application pending before the Vermont Public Service Board (VPSB) for a new Certificate of Public Good for operation until March 2032.  In April 2011, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee and Entergy Nuclear Operations, the owner and operator respectively of Vermont Yankee, filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont.  The suit challenged certain conditions imposed by Vermont upon Vermont Yankee’s continued operation and storage of spent nuclear fuel, including the requirement to obtain not only a new Certificate of Public Good, but also approval by Vermont’s General Assembly.  In January 2012 the court entered judgment in Entergy’s favor and specifically:
·
Declared that Vermont’s laws requiring Vermont Yankee to cease operation in March 2012 and prohibiting the storage of spent nuclear fuel from operation after that date, absent approval by the General Assembly, were based on radiological safety concerns and are preempted by the Atomic Energy Act;
·
Permanently enjoined Vermont from enforcing these preempted requirements of the state’s laws; and
·
Permanently enjoined Vermont under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution from conditioning the issuance of a new Certificate of Public Good upon the existence of a below wholesale market power sale agreement with Vermont utilities or Vermont Yankee’s selling power to Vermont utilities at rates below those available to wholesale customers in other states.

In February 2012 the Vermont defendants filed a notice of appeal of the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

In January 2012, Entergy filed a motion requesting that the VPSB grant, based on the existing record in its proceeding, Vermont Yankee’s pending application for a new Certificate of Public Good.  Entergy subsequently filed another motion asking the VPSB to declare that title 3, section 814(b) of the Vermont statutes (3 V.S.A. § 814(b)) authorized Vermont Yankee to operate while the Certificate of Public Good proceeding was pending because Entergy had timely filed a petition for a new Certificate of Public Good that had not yet been decided.  In March 2012, the VPSB issued orders denying Entergy’s motion with respect to 3 V.S.A. § 814(b) but stating that the order did not require Vermont Yankee to cease operations, denying Entergy’s motion to issue a new Certificate of Public Good based on the existing record, determining to open a new docket and to create a new record to decide Vermont Yankee’s request for a new Certificate of Public Good (without prejudice to any rights that Entergy might have under 3 V.S.A. § 814(b)), and directing Entergy to file an amended Certificate of Public Good petition that identified the specific approvals it was seeking in light of the district court’s decision.  In April 2012, Entergy filed its amended Certificate of Public Good petition.

In light of the actions taken by the VPSB, in February 2012, Vermont Yankee filed a cross-appeal of the United States District Court’s January 2012 decision.  Vermont Yankee also filed two motions with the district court asking it (1) to issue an injunction prohibiting Vermont from taking any action to force Vermont Yankee to shut down during the appeal of the district court’s decision or during the Certificate of Public Good proceeding before the VPSB and any judicial appeal from that proceeding, and (2) to amend the district court’s final judgment to include certain additional provisions of Vermont law relating to Vermont Yankee’s operation and storage of spent nuclear fuel from operation after March 21, 2012, that were part of the statutes the court found to be preempted in its decision, but which were not specifically included in the final judgment.  In March 2012, the district court found that Vermont Yankee was likely to prevail on the merits of its cross-appeal that an additional provision of Vermont law relating to the storage of spent nuclear fuel from operation after March 21, 2012 should have been invalidated as preempted.  The district court accordingly issued an injunction prohibiting Vermont from taking any action during the appeal to compel Vermont Yankee to shut down based on that provision of Vermont law.  The district court denied Vermont Yankee’s other requests for relief, citing the Vermont Attorney General’s representation that Vermont Yankee may continue to operate under the terms of its existing Certificate of Public Good while its petition for a new Certificate of Public Good is pending before the VPSB.
60

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements



Impairment

Because of the uncertainty regarding the continued operation of Vermont Yankee, Entergy has tested the recoverability of the plant and related assets each quarter since the first quarter 2010.  The determination of recoverability is based on the probability-weighted undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the plant and related assets.  Projected net cash flows primarily depend on the status of the pending legal and state regulatory matters, as well as projections of future revenues and expenses over the remaining life of the plant.  In prior quarters, the probability-weighted undiscounted net cash flows exceeded the carrying value of the Vermont Yankee plant and related assets.  The decline, however, in the overall energy market and the projected forward prices of power as of March 31, 2012, which are significant inputs in the determination of net cash flows, resulted in the probability-weighted undiscounted future cash flows being less than the asset group’s carrying value.  Entergy performed a fair value analysis based on the income approach, a discounted cash flow method, to determine the amount of impairment.  The estimated fair value of the plant and related assets at March 31, 2012 was $162.0 million, while the carrying value was $517.5 million.  Therefore, the assets were written down to their fair value and an impairment charge of $355.5 million ($223.5 million after-tax) was recognized.  The impairment charge is recorded as a separate line item in Entergy’s consolidated statement of income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2012, and is included within the results of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment.

The estimate of fair value was based on the price that Entergy would expect to receive in a hypothetical sale of the Vermont Yankee plant and related assets to a market participant on March 31, 2012.  In order to determine this price, Entergy used significant observable inputs, including quoted forward power and gas prices, where available.  Significant unobservable inputs, such as projected long-term pre-tax operating margins (cash basis), and estimated weighted average costs of capital were also used in the estimation of fair value.  In addition, Entergy made certain assumptions regarding future tax deductions associated with the plant and related assets.  Based on the use of significant unobservable inputs, the fair value measurement for the entirety of the asset group, and for each type of asset within the asset group, is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements.

The following table sets forth a description of significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of the Vermont Yankee plant and related assets as of March 31, 2012:

Significant Unobservable Inputs
Range
Weighted Average
Weighted average cost of capital
7.5%-8.0%
7.8%
Long-term pre-tax operating margin (cash basis)
6.1%-7.8%
7.2%

Entergy’s Accounting Policy group, which reports to the Chief Accounting Officer, was primarily responsible for determining the valuation of the Vermont Yankee plant and related assets, in consultation with external advisors.  Accounting Policy obtained and reviewed information from other Entergy departments with expertise on the various inputs and assumptions that were necessary to calculate the fair value of the asset group.


NOTE 12.  VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, System Energy)

See Note 18 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of variable interest entities.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for details of the nuclear fuel companies’ credit facility and commercial paper borrowings and long-term debt.

Entergy Louisiana and System Energy are each considered to hold a variable interest in the lessors from which they lease, respectively, undivided interests representing approximately 9.3% of the Waterford 3 and 11.5% of the Grand Gulf nuclear plants.  Entergy Louisiana and System Energy are the lessees under these arrangements, which are described in more detail in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K.  Entergy
61

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Financial Statements


Louisiana made payments on its lease, including interest, of $26.8 million and $37.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  System Energy made payments on its lease, including interest, of $48.1 million and $47.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
__________________________________

In the opinion of the management of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas and System Energy, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  The business of the Registrant Subsidiaries is subject to seasonal fluctuations, however, with the peak periods occurring during the third quarter.  The results for the interim periods presented should not be used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full year.


Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of March 31, 2012, evaluations were performed under the supervision and with the participation of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy (individually "Registrant" and collectively the "Registrants") management, including their respective Principal Executive Officers (PEO) and Principal Financial Officers (PFO).  The evaluations assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on the evaluations, each PEO and PFO has concluded that, as to the Registrant or Registrants for which they serve as PEO or PFO, the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and that the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are also effective in reasonably assuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s or Registrants’ management, including their respective PEOs and PFOs, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Registrants’ management, including their respective PEOs and PFOs, the Registrants evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and found no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.




MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business

See the “Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s plan to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp., including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Net income decreased $11.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue and higher other operation and maintenance expenses.

Net Revenue

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the first quarter 2012 to the first quarter 2011.

Amount
(In Millions)
2011 net revenue
$272.0
Volume/weather
(10.8)
Other
1.6
2012 net revenue
$262.8

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 299 GWh, or 6% in billed electricity usage primarily in the residential sector primarily due to milder weather.

Gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses

Gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to a change in the energy cost recovery rider effective April 2011.  The increase is also due to an increase of $8.2 million in rider revenues primarily due to higher System Agreement production cost equalization payments.  Entergy Arkansas’s fuel and purchased power recovery mechanism is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.

Fuel expenses increased primarily due to an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs.  Purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to an increase in purchases in 2011 resulting from the ANO2 refueling outage, and a decrease in purchases in 2012 due to the Grand Gulf refueling outage.



64

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Other Income Statement Variances

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

·
an increase of $4.7 million in compensation and benefits costs resulting from a decrease in the discount rate and changes in certain actuarial assumptions resulting from a recent experience study.  See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs;
·
nuclear insurance refunds of $2.4 million received in 2011; and
·
an increase of $1.9 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher labor costs, including higher contract labor.

Nuclear refueling outage expenses increased primarily due to higher costs associated with the most recent outage as compared to the previous outages.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in local franchise taxes resulting from higher retail electric revenues as compared with the same period in 2011.  There is no effect on net income as these taxes are recovered through the franchise tax rider.

Other income increased primarily due to higher earnings on decommissioning trust fund investments.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011 were 45.9% and 42.3%, respectively. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$22,599
$106,102
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
11,046
56,330
Investing activities
(53,146)
(110,123)
Financing activities
25,184
(24,924)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(16,916)
(78,717)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$5,683
$27,385

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $45.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to the $156 million System Agreement bandwidth remedy payment in January 2012 as a result of the payment required to implement the FERC’s remedy for the period June – December 2005.  See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 2 to the financial
65

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


statements herein for a discussion of the System Agreement bandwidth remedy payment.  The decrease was partially offset by a decrease of $62.7 million in pension contributions and the increased recovery of fuel costs.  See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $57 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle, and the repayment in 2011 by System Fuels of Entergy Arkansas’s $11 million investment in System Fuels.  The decrease was partially offset by an increase in construction expenditures primarily due to increased transmission reliability work in 2012.

Financing Activities

Entergy Arkansas’s financing activities provided $25.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to using $24.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011  primarily due to money pool activity and $13.1 million in dividends paid on common stock in 2011, partially offset by an increase in net repayments from the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.

Increases in Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool increased by $49 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Capital Structure

Entergy Arkansas’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Debt to capital
54.6%
55.0%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds
(1.5)%
(1.5)%
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)
53.1%
53.5%
Effect of subtracting cash
(0.2)%
(0.3)%
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)
52.9%
53.2%

(1)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas.

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and shareholders’ equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Arkansas uses the net debt to net capital ratio and the ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial condition.

Uses and Sources of Capital

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s uses and sources of capital.  Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.


66

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Entergy Arkansas’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
March 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
(In Thousands)
($49,043)
$17,362
$19,015
$41,463

See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

As of March 31, 2012, Entergy Arkansas had a credit facility in the amount of $78 million that expired in April 2012 and a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in March 2017.  In April 2012, at the expiration of the $78 million facility, Entergy Arkansas entered into a new $20 million credit facility that expires in April 2013.  No borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of March 31, 2012.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.

Hot Spring Energy Facility Purchase Agreement

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s agreement to acquire the Hot Spring Energy Facility.  The parties have satisfied their obligations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, and the U.S. Department of Justice’s review of the transaction is ongoing.

In July 2011, Entergy Arkansas filed its application with the APSC requesting approval of the acquisition and full cost recovery.  In January 2012, Entergy Arkansas, the APSC General Staff, and the Arkansas Attorney General filed a Motion to Suspend the Procedural Schedule and Joint Stipulation and Settlement for consideration by the APSC.  Under the settlement, the parties agreed that the acquisition costs may be recovered through a capacity acquisition rider and agreed that the level of the return on equity reflected in the rider would be submitted to the APSC for resolution.  Because the transmission upgrade costs remained uncertain, the parties requested that the APSC suspend the procedural schedule and cancel the hearing scheduled for January 24, 2012, pending resolution of the transmission costs.  The APSC issued an order accepting the settlement as part of the record and directing Entergy Arkansas to file the transmission studies when available and directing the parties to propose a procedural schedule to address the results of those studies.

On April 6, 2012, facilities studies were issued indicating that long-term transmission service is available for the Hot Spring facility provided that supplemental transmission upgrades estimated at approximately $440,000 are made.  In addition, the studies noted that surveys of two lines should be conducted, which may result in additional upgrade requirements not expected to exceed $25 million.  On April 16, 2012, Entergy Arkansas filed the facilities studies with the APSC and reiterated its request for a public interest finding and timely cost recovery. Assuming timely regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of all other closing conditions, closing is targeted for around mid-2012.

State and Local Rate Regulation

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – State and Local Rate Regulation " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation.  See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for an update regarding the System Agreement proceedings and Entergy Arkansas’s production cost allocation rider.

Federal Regulation

See " System Agreement " and " Independent Coordinator of Transmission " in the " Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation " section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.
67

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis



Nuclear Matters

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Nuclear Matters " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.

Environmental Risks

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Environmental Risks " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Arkansas’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.

















(Page left blank intentionally)



CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$ 475,178 $ 443,498
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale
134,802 82,231
Purchased power
78,796 92,854
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
11,787 9,961
Other operation and maintenance
125,373 116,984
Decommissioning
9,888 9,297
Taxes other than income taxes
20,684 19,579
Depreciation and amortization
55,241 55,258
Other regulatory credits - net
(1,209 ) (3,571 )
TOTAL
435,362 382,593
OPERATING INCOME
39,816 60,905
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,725 1,065
Interest and investment income
5,857 3,780
Miscellaneous - net
(1,453 ) (749 )
TOTAL
6,129 4,096
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
20,750 21,063
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(442 ) (479 )
TOTAL
20,308 20,584
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
25,637 44,417
Income taxes
11,763 18,809
NET INCOME
13,874 25,608
Preferred dividend requirements
1,718 1,718
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO
COMMON STOCK
$ 12,156 $ 23,890
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$ 13,874 $ 25,608
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
88,981 81,884
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
34,625 23,272
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
17,958 21,567
Fuel inventory
(2,455 ) (15,702 )
Accounts payable
(211,524 ) 36,504
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
(9,127 ) (1,190 )
Interest accrued
(10,974 ) (6,930 )
Deferred fuel costs
53,521 9,352
Other working capital accounts
14,682 (21,721 )
Provisions for estimated losses
(112 ) 2,149
Other regulatory assets
21,956 10,319
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(9,770 ) (73,531 )
Other assets and liabilities
9,411 (35,251 )
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
11,046 56,330
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(81,518 ) (70,379 )
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
2,865 1,065
Nuclear fuel purchases
(34,595 ) (61,561 )
Proceeds from sale of nuclear fuel
49,879 -
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
54,727 31,042
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(57,898 ) (40,021 )
Change in money pool receivable - net
17,362 22,448
Investment in affiliates
- 10,994
Remittances to transition charge account
(3,968 ) (3,711 )
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(53,146 ) (110,123 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Changes in short-term borrowings - net
(21,376 ) (10,016 )
Changes in money pool payable - net
49,043 -
Dividends paid:
Common stock
- (13,100 )
Preferred stock
(1,718 ) (1,718 )
Other
(765 ) (90 )
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
25,184 (24,924 )
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(16,916 ) (78,717 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
22,599 106,102
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 5,683 $ 27,385
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$ 30,476 $ 26,694
Income taxes
$ (10,584 ) $ -
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$ 5,683 $ 4,712
Temporary cash investments
- 17,887
Total cash and cash equivalents
5,683 22,599
Securitization recovery trust account
7,857 3,890
Accounts receivable:
Customer
86,118 90,940
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(26,381 ) (26,155 )
Associated companies
44,155 58,030
Other
60,755 66,838
Accrued unbilled revenues
60,401 70,715
Total accounts receivable
225,048 260,368
Deferred fuel costs
69,924 209,776
Fuel inventory - at average cost
51,344 48,889
Materials and supplies - at average cost
145,263 143,343
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
37,451 49,047
System agreement cost equalization
36,800 36,800
Prepayments and other
7,851 8,562
TOTAL
587,221 783,274
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Decommissioning trust funds
584,460 541,657
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
1,676 1,677
Other
3,182 3,182
TOTAL
589,318 546,516
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
8,126,584 8,079,732
Property under capital lease
1,215 1,234
Construction work in progress
150,733 120,211
Nuclear fuel
217,216 272,593
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
8,495,748 8,473,770
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
3,880,320 3,833,596
UTILITY PLANT - NET
4,615,428 4,640,174
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Deferred fuel costs
86,331 -
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
85,063 87,357
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of
$102,656 as of March 31, 2012 and $105,762 as of
December 31, 2011)
1,106,597 1,126,911
Other
32,598 27,980
TOTAL
1,310,589 1,242,248
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 7,102,556 $ 7,212,212
See Notes to Financial Statements.

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Short-term borrowings
$ 12,538 $ 33,914
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
101,196 228,163
Other
107,945 138,054
Customer deposits
83,352 81,074
Taxes accrued
27,154 36,281
Accumulated deferred income taxes
61,432 124,267
Interest accrued
18,907 29,881
Other
25,315 23,305
TOTAL
437,839 694,939
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
1,805,626 1,708,760
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
42,441 42,939
Other regulatory liabilities
172,489 133,960
Decommissioning
650,116 640,228
Accumulated provisions
5,528 5,640
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
529,255 539,016
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $113,762 as of
March 31, 2012 and $ 113,761 as of December 31, 2011)
1,875,944 1,875,921
Other
10,688 10,335
TOTAL
5,092,087 4,956,799
Commitments and Contingencies
Preferred stock without sinking fund
116,350 116,350
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 325,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding 46,980,196 shares in 2012
and 2011
470 470
Paid-in capital
588,444 588,444
Retained earnings
867,366 855,210
TOTAL
1,456,280 1,444,124
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 7,102,556 $ 7,212,212
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited) (In Thousands)
Common Equity
Common Stock
Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
$ 470 $ 588,444 $ 814,992 $ 1,403,906
Net income
- - 25,608 25,608
Common stock dividends
- - (13,100 ) (13,100 )
Preferred stock dividends
- - (1,718 ) (1,718 )
Balance at March 31, 2011
$ 470 $ 588,444 $ 825,782 $ 1,414,696
Balance at December 31, 2011
$ 470 $ 588,444 $ 855,210 $ 1,444,124
Net income
- - 13,874 13,874
Preferred stock dividends
- - (1,718 ) (1,718 )
Balance at March 31, 2012
$ 470 $ 588,444 $ 867,366 $ 1,456,280
See Notes to Financial Statements.


SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Increase/
Description
2012
2011
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$ 175 $ 175 $ - -
Commercial
102 92 10 11
Industrial
94 83 11 13
Governmental
5 4 1 25
Total retail
376 354 22 6
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
77 64 13 20
Non-associated companies
17 24 (7 ) (29 )
Other
5 1 4 400
Total
$ 475 $ 443 $ 32 7
Billed Electric Energy
Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,987 2,251 (264 ) (12 )
Commercial
1,340 1,360 (20 ) (1 )
Industrial
1,599 1,613 (14 ) (1 )
Governmental
63 64 (1 ) (2 )
Total retail
4,989 5,288 (299 ) (6 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
2,111 1,658 453 27
Non-associated companies
265 324 (59 ) (18 )
Total
7,365 7,270 95 1



MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business

See the “ Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business ” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s plan to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp., including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Net income decreased $18.3 million primarily due to lower net revenue.

Net Revenue

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the first quarter 2012 to the first quarter 2011.

Amount
(In Millions)
2011 net revenue
$225.1
Volume/weather
(10.4)
Net wholesale revenue
(6.3)
Net gas revenue
(3.1)
Other
(1.4)
2012 net revenue
$203.9

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of milder weather on residential and commercial sales, partially offset by an increase of 105 GWh, or 2%, in weather-adjusted usage across all sectors.

The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower price.

The net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather primarily on the residential sector.

Gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses

Gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to the decrease in wholesale revenue, as discussed above, a decrease of $26 million in fuel cost recovery revenues primarily due to lower fuel rates, and the decrease related to volume/weather, as discussed above.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s fuel and purchased power recovery mechanism is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.


76

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis



Fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to:

·
a decrease in the average market price of purchased power and decreased net area demand; and
·
a decrease in natural gas fuel expense primarily due to decreased demand for gas-fired generation and a decrease in the market price of natural gas.

The decrease was partially offset by an increase in deferred fuel expense primarily due to higher fuel and purchased power expenses in 2011 as a result of the River Bend refueling outage, offset by lower fuel cost recovery revenues in 2012.

Other Income Statement Variances

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

·
an increase of $3.5 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses resulting from increased plant outages and an increased scope of work as compared to the prior year;
·
an increase of $2.3 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to decreasing discount rates and changes in certain actuarial assumptions resulting from a recent experience study.  See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs; and
·
an increase of $1.2 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher labor costs, including higher contract labor.

The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $1.1 million in transmission expenses primarily due to lower transmission equalization expenses incurred under the System Agreement in 2012.

Other income increased primarily due to an increase of $1.9 million in investment income earned on decommissioning trust funds.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate was 38.3% for the first quarter 2012.  The difference in the effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2012 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the book and tax difference related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests.

The effective income tax rate was 34.8% for the first quarter 2011.  The difference in the effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2011 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the book and tax difference related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests.

Correction of Regulatory Asset for Income Taxes

See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the financial statement effects of a correction to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s regulatory asset for income taxes.

77

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$24,845
$155,173
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
191,558
50,088
Investing activities
(51,137)
(110,165)
Financing activities
(36,219)
(38,510)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
104,202
(98,587)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$129,047
$56,586

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $141.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to:

·
an increase in the recovery of fuel costs due to System Agreement bandwidth remedy payments of $75 million received in January 2012 as a result of receipts required to implement the FERC’s remedy in an October 2011 order for the period June – December 2005.  See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the System Agreement proceedings; and
·
a decrease of $30 million in pension contributions.  See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $59 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to:

·
$51 million in proceeds from the sale of a portion of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s investment in Entergy Holdings Company’s Class A preferred membership interests to a third party; and
·
fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle.

The decrease was offset by an increase in money pool activity.

Increases in Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool increased by $49.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to decreasing by $14.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility operating companies’ need for external short-term borrowings.


78

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Financing Activities

Net cash flow used in financing activities decreased $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease of $55.8 million in common equity distributions, offset by a decrease of $12.7 million in credit borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to an increase of $40.3 million in credit borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2011 against the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.

Capital Structure

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Debt to capital
53.3%
53.6%
Effect of subtracting cash
(2.2)%
(0.4)%
Net debt to net capital
51.1%
53.2%

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable, capital lease obligations and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt and member’s equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s financial condition.

Uses and Sources of Capital

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s uses and sources of capital.  Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
March 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
(In Thousands)
$73,180
$23,596
$48,200
$63,003

See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in March 2017.  No borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of March 31, 2012.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facility.

In the first quarter 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana sold to a third party for $51 million a portion of its investment in Entergy Holdings Company’s Class A preferred membership interests.

New Nuclear Development

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the project option being developed by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for new nuclear generation at River Bend.  In March 2010, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC seeking approval to continue the limited development activities necessary to preserve an option to construct a new unit at River Bend.  The testimony and legal briefs of the LPSC staff generally support the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, although other parties filed briefs, without supporting testimony, in opposition to the request.  At an evidentiary hearing in October 2011, Entergy Gulf
79

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and the LPSC staff presented testimony in support of certification of activities to preserve an option for a new nuclear plant at River Bend.  The ALJ recommended, however, that the LPSC decline the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana on the basis that the LPSC’s rule on new nuclear development does not apply to activities to preserve an option to develop and on the further grounds that the companies improperly engaged in advanced preparation activities prior to certification.  There has been no suggestion that the planning activities or costs incurred were imprudent.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana have requested oral argument before the LPSC.

Entergy Louisiana’s Ninemile Point Unit 6 Self-Build Project

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s Ninemile Point Unit 6 self-build project.  The Ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% to Entergy Louisiana, 25% to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and 20% to Entergy New Orleans.  In February 2012 the City Council passed a resolution authorizing Entergy New Orleans to purchase 20% of the Ninemile 6 energy and capacity.  In June 2011, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by Entergy Louisiana’s construction of the facility.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana joined in the application, seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of its allocated share of the capacity and energy generated by Ninemile 6.  In March 2012 the LPSC unanimously voted to grant the certifications requested by Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana has given the contractor a full notice to proceed with the construction. Under the terms approved by the LPSC, costs may be recovered through Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s formula rate plan, if one is in effect when the project is placed in service; alternatively, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s must file a rate case approximately 12 months prior to the expected in-service date.

State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery . Following is an update to that discussion.

In January 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2011.  The filing showed an earned return on common equity of 10.48%, which is within the earnings bandwidth of 10.5%, plus or minus fifty basis points.  In April 2012, the LPSC Staff filed its findings, suggesting adjustments that will produce an 11.54% earned return on common equity for the test year and a $0.1 million rate reduction.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana accepted the LPSC Staff’s recommendations, and the rate reduction will be effective with the first billing cycle of May 2012.

Industrial and Commercial Customers

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Industrial and Commercial Customers " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial and commercial customers.

Federal Regulation

See “ Independent Coordinator of Transmission ,” “ System Agreement ,” “ Entergy’s Proposal to Join the MISO RTO ,” “ Notice to SERC Reliability Corporation Regarding Reliability Standards and FERC Investigation ”, and “ U.S. Department of Justice Investigation ” in the “ Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation – Federal Regulation ” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.


80

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Nuclear Matters

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Nuclear Matters " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.

Environmental Risks

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Environmental Risks " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund investments, and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.






















(Page left blank intentionally)


INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$ 382,186 $ 467,041
Natural gas
17,436 28,857
TOTAL
399,622 495,898
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale
71,297 80,635
Purchased power
124,164 191,108
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
4,365 5,018
Other operation and maintenance
85,635 79,014
Decommissioning
3,676 3,471
Taxes other than income taxes
18,895 18,801
Depreciation and amortization
36,097 35,724
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
267 (942 )
TOTAL
344,396 412,829
OPERATING INCOME
55,226 83,069
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
2,262 1,740
Interest and investment income
11,238 9,358
Miscellaneous - net
(2,628 ) (2,161 )
TOTAL
10,872 8,937
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
21,055 21,349
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(899 ) (865 )
TOTAL
20,156 20,484
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
45,942 71,522
Income taxes
17,584 24,903
NET INCOME
28,358 46,619
Preferred distribution requirements
206 206
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO
COMMON EQUITY
$ 28,152 $ 46,413
See Notes to Financial Statements.


STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Net Income
$ 28,358 $ 46,619
Other comprehensive income
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(net of tax expense of $781 and $507)
1,028 743
Other comprehensive income
1,028 743
Comprehensive Income
$ 29,386 $ 47,362
See Notes to Financial Statements.



STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$ 28,358 $ 46,619
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
53,528 48,769
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
(56,657 ) (26,285 )
Changes in working capital:
Receivables
97,172 (14,666 )
Fuel inventory
(7,611 ) 785
Accounts payable
(35,277 ) (51,411 )
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
85,148 62,194
Interest accrued
5,137 4,965
Deferred fuel costs
8,144 (13,181 )
Other working capital accounts
4,806 (28,764 )
Changes in provisions for estimated losses
(2,870 ) 155
Changes in other regulatory assets
5,634 (17,243 )
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities
513 (11,665 )
Other
5,533 49,816
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
191,558 50,088
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(57,921 ) (59,880 )
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
2,262 1,740
Nuclear fuel purchases
(18,614 ) (62,237 )
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel
26,820 -
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
38,087 11,902
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(43,222 ) (16,450 )
Change in money pool receivable - net
(49,584 ) 14,803
Proceeds from the sale of investment
51,000 -
Changes in other investments - net
35 (43 )
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(51,137 ) (110,165 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Changes in credit borrowings - net
(12,700 ) 40,300
Dividends/distributions paid:
Common equity
(22,600 ) (78,400 )
Preferred membership interests
(206 ) (206 )
Other
(713 ) (204 )
Net cash flow used in financing activities
(36,219 ) (38,510 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
104,202 (98,587 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
24,845 155,173
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 129,047 $ 56,586
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$ 15,152 $ 15,596
Income taxes
$ - $ (7 )
See Notes to Financial Statements.



BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$ 187 $ 217
Temporary cash investments
128,860 24,628
Total cash and cash equivalents
129,047 24,845
Accounts receivable:
Customer
56,324 61,648
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(590 ) (843 )
Associated companies
136,181 171,431
Other
18,629 22,082
Accrued unbilled revenues
47,341 51,155
Total accounts receivable
257,885 305,473
Fuel inventory - at average cost
30,860 23,249
Materials and supplies - at average cost
116,549 114,075
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
16,691 21,066
Prepayments and other
5,722 5,180
TOTAL
556,754 493,888
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliate preferred membership interests
289,664 339,664
Decommissioning trust funds
455,365 420,917
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
162,922 164,712
Storm reserve escrow account
90,215 90,249
Other
13,153 12,701
TOTAL
1,011,319 1,028,243
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
7,094,214 7,068,657
Natural gas
131,144 129,950
Construction work in progress
145,155 122,051
Nuclear fuel
175,250 206,031
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
7,545,763 7,526,689
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
3,935,310 3,906,353
UTILITY PLANT - NET
3,610,453 3,620,336
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
172,496 173,724
Other regulatory assets
328,491 333,898
Deferred fuel costs
100,124 100,124
Other
17,888 13,506
TOTAL
618,999 621,252
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 5,797,525 $ 5,763,719
See Notes to Financial Statements.



ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$ 60,000 $ 60,000
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
56,189 73,305
Other
76,575 101,009
Customer deposits
48,381 49,734
Taxes accrued
192,515 107,367
Accumulated deferred income taxes
23,957 5,107
Interest accrued
31,221 26,084
Deferred fuel costs
105,322 97,178
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
8,039 7,911
Gas hedge contracts
13,538 8,572
Other
15,128 15,294
TOTAL
630,865 551,561
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
1,294,350 1,368,563
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
80,718 81,520
Other regulatory liabilities
89,688 75,721
Decommissioning and asset retirement cost liabilities
364,938 359,792
Accumulated provisions
96,163 99,033
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
333,057 332,672
Long-term debt
1,469,790 1,482,430
Long-term payables - associated companies
30,717 31,254
Other
65,888 47,397
TOTAL
3,825,309 3,878,382
Commitments and Contingencies
EQUITY
Preferred membership interests without sinking fund
10,000 10,000
Member's equity
1,399,933 1,393,386
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(68,582 ) (69,610 )
TOTAL
1,341,351 1,333,776
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 5,797,525 $ 5,763,719
See Notes to Financial Statements.



STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited) (In Thousands)
Common Equity
Preferred Membership Interests
Member's Equity
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
$ 10,000 $ 1,494,593 $ (40,304 ) $ 1,464,289
Net income
- 46,619 - 46,619
Other comprehensive income
- - 743 743
Dividends/distributions declared on common equity
- (78,400 ) - (78,400 )
Dividends/distributions declared on preferred membership interests
- (206 ) - (206 )
Other
- (5 ) - (5 )
Balance at March 31, 2011
$ 10,000 $ 1,462,601 $ (39,561 ) $ 1,433,040
Balance at December 31, 2011
$ 10,000 $ 1,393,386 $ (69,610 ) $ 1,333,776
Net income
- 28,358 - 28,358
Members contribution
- 1,000 - 1,000
Other comprehensive income
- - 1,028 1,028
Dividends/distributions declared on common equity
- (22,600 ) - (22,600 )
Dividends/distributions declared on preferred membership interests
- (206 ) - (206 )
Other
- (5 ) - (5 )
Balance at March 31, 2012
$ 10,000 $ 1,399,933 $ (68,582 ) $ 1,341,351
See Notes to Financial Statements.



SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Increase/
Description
2012
2011
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$ 88 $ 110 $ (22 ) (20 )
Commercial
86 97 (11 ) (11 )
Industrial
106 115 (9 ) (8 )
Governmental
5 5 - -
Total retail
285 327 (42 ) (13 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
84 119 (35 ) (29 )
Non-associated companies
3 13 (10 ) (77 )
Other
10 8 2 25
Total
$ 382 $ 467 $ (85 ) (18 )
Billed Electric Energy
Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,059 1,247 (188 ) (15 )
Commercial
1,178 1,213 (35 ) (3 )
Industrial
2,195 2,175 20 1
Governmental
59 53 6 11
Total retail
4,491 4,688 (197 ) (4 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
1,843 1,874 (31 ) (2 )
Non-associated companies
170 204 (34 ) (17 )
Total
6,504 6,766 (262 ) (4 )


MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business

See the “ Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business ” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s plan to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp., including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Net income decreased $7 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, and higher interest expense, partially offset by a lower effective income tax rate.

Net Revenue

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits.  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the first quarter 2012 to the first quarter 2011.

Amount
(In Millions)
2011 net revenue
$233.8
Retail electric price
13.3
Volume/weather
(12.8)
Other
1.4
2012 net revenue
$235.7

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a special formula rate plan rate increase effective May 2011 in accordance with a previous LPSC order relating to the acquisition of Unit 2 of the Acadia Energy Center.  See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan increase.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of milder weather on residential and commercial sales, offset by increased usage in the industrial sector as a result of increased consumption by a large industrial customer in the chemical industry as a result of plant expansion.

Gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses

Gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $26.3 million in fuel cost recovery revenues primarily due to lower fuel rates and the decrease related to volume/weather, as discussed above.  Entergy Louisiana’s fuel and purchased power recovery mechanism is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.

Fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average market price of natural gas.

90

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Other Income Statement Variances

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

·
an increase of $2.7 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to decreasing discount rates and changes in certain actuarial assumptions resulting from a recent experience study.  See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs;
·
an increase of $1.8 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses due to an overall higher scope of outages compared to prior year and the addition of Acadia Unit 2 in April 2011;
·
an increase of $1.2 million in nuclear generation expenses due to higher nuclear labor costs; and
·
nuclear insurance refunds of $1.1 million received in 2011.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.

Interest expense increased primarily due to:

·
the issuance of $200 million of 4.8% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2011;
·
the issuance by Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy Louisiana, of $207.2 million of senior secured investment recovery bonds with a coupon rate of 2.04% in September 2011; and
·
the issuance of $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds in January 2012.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2012 was 6.6%.  The difference in the effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2012 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to the book and tax difference related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.

The effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2011 was 19.9%.  The difference in the effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2011 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to the book and tax difference related to the non-taxable distributions earned on preferred membership interests and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by state income taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$878
$123,254
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
79,357
6,602
Investing activities
(97,949)
(257,500)
Financing activities
42,348
234,593
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
23,756
(16,305)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$24,634
$106,949
91

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis



Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $72.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to the purchase in 2011 of $28.1 million of fuel oil from System Fuels because System Fuels will no longer procure fuel oil for the Utility companies, a decrease of $24.1 million in pension contributions, and increased recovery of fuel costs due to an increase in the amount of deferred fuel to be recovered compared to last year.  See “ MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates ” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $159.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to:

·
a decrease in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle;
·
a decrease in nuclear construction expenditures due to the delay of the Waterford 3 steam generator replacement project and the dry fuel storage project implemented in 2011;
·
a decrease in transmission construction expenditures due to load addition and reliability work performed in 2011; and
·
money pool activity.

Increases in Entergy Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool increased by $13.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to increasing by $34.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.

Financing Activities

Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $192.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to the following cash flow activity:

·
money pool activity;
·
the issuance of $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds in January 2012 compared to the issuance of $200 million of 4.8% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2011;
·
the payment on credit borrowings of $50 million on Entergy Louisiana’s credit facility in 2012;
·
a principal payment of $19.6 million in 2012 for the Waterford 3 sale-leaseback obligation compared to a principal payment of $30.3 million in 2011;
·
the payment on borrowings of $15 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2012 compared to an increase in borrowings of $61.3 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2011; and
·
a decrease of $11.8 million in common equity dividends in 2012.

Decreases in Entergy Louisiana’s payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana’s payable to the money pool decreased by $118.4 million in 2012.
92

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis



Capital Structure

Entergy Louisiana’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Debt to capital
48.7%
47.2%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds
(2.2)%
(2.3)%
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)
46.5%
44.9%
Effect of subtracting cash
(0.3)%
0.0%
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)
46.2%
44.9%

(1)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Louisiana.

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt and member’s equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Louisiana uses the net debt to net capital ratio and the ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition.

Uses and Sources of Capital

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s uses and sources of capital.  Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy Louisiana’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
March 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
(In Thousands)
$13,383
($118,415)
$84,257
$49,887
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

Entergy Louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $200 million scheduled to expire in March 2017.  No borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of March 31, 2012.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facility.

New Nuclear Development

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the project option being developed by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for new nuclear generation at River Bend.  In March 2010, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC seeking approval to continue the limited development activities necessary to preserve an option to construct a new unit at River Bend.  The testimony and legal briefs of the LPSC staff generally support the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, although other parties filed briefs, without supporting testimony, in opposition to the request.  At an evidentiary hearing in October 2011, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and the LPSC staff presented testimony in support of certification of activities to preserve an option for a new nuclear plant at River Bend.  The ALJ recommended, however, that the LPSC decline
93

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana on the basis that the LPSC’s rule on new nuclear development does not apply to activities to preserve an option to develop and on the further grounds that the companies improperly engaged in advanced preparation activities prior to certification.  There has been no suggestion that the planning activities or costs incurred were imprudent.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana have requested oral argument before the LPSC.

Entergy Louisiana’s Ninemile Point Unit 6 Self-Build Project

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s Ninemile Point Unit 6 self-build project.  The Ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% to Entergy Louisiana, 25% to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and 20% to Entergy New Orleans.  In February 2012 the City Council passed a resolution authorizing Entergy New Orleans to purchase 20% of the Ninemile 6 energy and capacity.  In June 2011, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by Entergy Louisiana’s construction of the facility.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana joined in the application, seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of its allocated share of the capacity and energy generated by Ninemile 6. In March 2012 the LPSC unanimously voted to grant the certifications requested by Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana has given the contractor a full notice to proceed with the construction. Under the terms approved by the LPSC, costs may be recovered through Entergy Louisiana’s formula rate plan, if one is in effect when the project is placed in service; alternatively, Entergy Louisiana must file a rate case approximately 12 months prior to the expected in-service date.

State and Local Rate Regulation

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – State and Local Rate Regulation " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation .

Federal Regulation

See " System Agreement " and " Independent Coordinator of Transmission " in the " Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation " section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.

Nuclear Matters

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Nuclear Matters " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.

Environmental Risks

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Environmental Risks " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Louisiana’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.



CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$ 482,358 $ 515,434
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale
72,059 85,225
Purchased power
178,213 200,378
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
6,386 7,475
Other operation and maintenance
115,741 106,365
Decommissioning
6,444 6,001
Taxes other than income taxes
17,282 16,739
Depreciation and amortization
53,679 49,646
Other regulatory credits - net
(3,588 ) (3,956 )
TOTAL
446,216 467,873
OPERATING INCOME
36,142 47,561
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
8,449 7,374
Interest and investment income
21,248 20,410
Miscellaneous - net
(1,371 ) (522 )
TOTAL
28,326 27,262
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
32,668 28,635
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(3,859 ) (4,097 )
TOTAL
28,809 24,538
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
35,659 50,285
Income taxes
2,364 9,987
NET INCOME
33,295 40,298
Preferred dividend requirements
1,738 1,738
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO
COMMON EQUITY
$ 31,557 $ 38,560
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Net Income
$ 33,295 $ 40,298
Other comprehensive income
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(net of tax expense of $470 and $366)
653 734
Other comprehensive income
653 734
Comprehensive Income
$ 33,948 $ 41,032
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$ 33,295 $ 40,298
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
76,616 69,822
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
22,771 67,448
Changes in working capital:
Receivables
27,098 (30,234 )
Fuel inventory
57 (28,153 )
Accounts payable
(57,561 ) (33 )
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued
(4,447 ) (44,287 )
Interest accrued
(4,574 ) (6,059 )
Deferred fuel costs
(21,520 ) (31,290 )
Other working capital accounts
19,986 (288 )
Changes in provisions for estimated losses
(10,981 ) (4,774 )
Changes in other regulatory assets
7,800 2,807
Changes in pension and other postretirement liabilities
(3,965 ) (29,844 )
Other
(5,218 ) 1,189
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
79,357 6,602
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(93,844 ) (108,014 )
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
8,449 7,374
Nuclear fuel purchases
(22,327 ) (119,435 )
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear fuel
32,168 -
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account
770 -
Remittances to transition charge account
(6,716 ) -
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
6,795 6,077
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(9,861 ) (9,038 )
Change in money pool receivable - net
(13,383 ) (34,370 )
Other
- (94 )
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(97,949 ) (257,500 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
247,725 217,762
Changes in short-term borrowings - net
(65,021 ) 61,253
Retirement of long-term debt
(19,603 ) (30,284 )
Change in money pool payable - net
(118,415 ) -
Distributions paid:
Common equity
(600 ) (12,400 )
Preferred membership interests
(1,738 ) (1,738 )
Net cash flow provided by financing activities
42,348 234,593
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
23,756 (16,305 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
878 123,254
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 24,634 $ 106,949
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$ 36,039 $ 33,726
Income taxes
$ (3,601 ) $ -
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$ 1,168 $ 878
Temporary cash investments
23,466 -
Total cash and cash equivalents
24,634 878
Securitization recovery trust account
11,916 5,200
Accounts receivable:
Customer
82,866 102,379
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(910 ) (1,147 )
Associated companies
76,465 60,661
Other
8,881 10,945
Accrued unbilled revenues
70,251 78,430
Total accounts receivable
237,553 251,268
Fuel inventory
23,862 23,919
Materials and supplies - at average cost
142,876 140,561
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
17,958 24,197
Prepayments and other
11,429 13,171
TOTAL
470,228 459,194
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliate preferred membership interests
807,424 807,424
Decommissioning trust funds
274,471 253,968
Storm reserve escrow account
200,479 201,249
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
715 760
TOTAL
1,283,089 1,263,401
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
7,899,007 7,859,136
Property under capital lease
274,334 274,334
Construction work in progress
595,676 559,437
Nuclear fuel
129,091 165,380
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
8,898,108 8,858,287
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
3,644,252 3,606,706
UTILITY PLANT - NET
5,253,856 5,251,581
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
181,816 175,952
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of
$192,931 as of March 31, 2012 and
$198,445 as of December 31, 2011)
801,116 814,472
Deferred fuel costs
67,998 67,998
Other
37,893 31,269
TOTAL
1,088,823 1,089,691
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 8,095,996 $ 8,063,867
See Notes to Financial Statements.



ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$ 17,943 $ 75,309
Short-term borrowings
29,371 44,392
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
43,803 218,001
Other
123,693 130,295
Customer deposits
86,948 86,099
Accumulated deferred income taxes
9,883 4,690
Taxes accrued
26,891 31,338
Interest accrued
31,961 36,535
Deferred fuel costs
45,015 66,535
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
9,224 9,161
System agreement cost equalization
36,800 36,800
Gas hedge contracts
19,104 12,397
Other
26,042 19,278
TOTAL
506,678 770,830
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
1,124,506 1,098,690
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
72,507 73,283
Other regulatory liabilities
302,222 295,542
Decommissioning
352,278 345,834
Accumulated provisions
202,079 213,060
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
455,657 459,685
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of
$207,123 as of March 31, 2012 and
$207,123 as of December 31, 2011)
2,414,717 2,177,003
Other
68,813 65,011
TOTAL
4,992,779 4,728,108
Commitments and Contingencies
EQUITY
Preferred membership interests without sinking fund
100,000 100,000
Member's equity
2,535,393 2,504,436
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(38,854 ) (39,507 )
TOTAL
2,596,539 2,564,929
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 8,095,996 $ 8,063,867
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited) (In Thousands)
Common Equity
Preferred Membership Interests
Member's Equity
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
$ 100,000 $ 2,061,833 $ (24,962 ) $ 2,136,871
Net income
- 40,298 - 40,298
Other comprehensive income
- - 734 734
Dividends/distributions declared on common equity
- (12,400 ) - (12,400 )
Dividends/distributions declared on preferred membership interests
- (1,738 ) - (1,738 )
Balance at March 31, 2011
$ 100,000 $ 2,087,993 $ (24,228 ) $ 2,163,765
Balance at December 31, 2011
$ 100,000 $ 2,504,436 $ (39,507 ) $ 2,564,929
Net income
- 33,295 - 33,295
Other comprehensive income
- - 653 653
Dividends/distributions declared on common equity
- (600 ) - (600 )
Dividends/distributions declared on preferred membership interests
- (1,738 ) - (1,738 )
Balance at March 31, 2012
$ 100,000 $ 2,535,393 $ (38,854 ) $ 2,596,539
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Increase/
Description
2012
2011
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$ 146 $ 172 $ (26 ) (15 )
Commercial
110 114 (4 ) (3 )
Industrial
184 175 9 5
Governmental
9 10 (1 ) (10 )
Total retail
449 471 (22 ) (5 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
21 32 (11 ) (34 )
Non-associated companies
- 2 (2 ) (100 )
Other
12 10 2 20
Total
$ 482 $ 515 $ (33 ) (6 )
Billed Electric Energy
Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,890 2,251 (361 ) (16 )
Commercial
1,361 1,403 (42 ) (3 )
Industrial
4,107 3,631 476 13
Governmental
116 119 (3 ) (3 )
Total retail
7,474 7,404 70 1
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
436 472 (36 ) (8 )
Non-associated companies
11 39 (28 ) (72 )
Total
7,921 7,915 6 -




MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business

See the “ Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business ” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s plan to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp., including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Net income decreased $8.6 million primarily due to lower net revenue.

Net Revenue

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the first quarter 2012 to the first quarter 2011.

Amount
(In Millions)
2011 net revenue
$125.5
Retail electric price
(2.6)
Reserve equalization
(2.1)
Volume/weather
(1.8)
Other
0.2
2012 net revenue
$119.2

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a decrease in Attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider.  The net income effect of the Attala power plant costs recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by Attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation expenses, and taxes other than income taxes.

The reserve equalization variance is primarily due to decreased reserve equalization revenue as a result of changes in the Entergy System generation mix compared to the same period in 2011.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 202 GWh, or 6%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of milder weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year.

Gross operating revenues and other regulatory charges (credits)

Gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $11 million in power management rider revenue and a decrease of $13.2 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in sales to affiliated customers.

102

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Other regulatory charges decreased primarily due to decreased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider.  There is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider.

Other Income Statement Variances

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $1.2 million in distribution expenses primarily due to non-vegetation contract work and an increase of $1 million in compensation and benefits costs resulting from decreasing discount rates and changes in certain actuarial assumptions resulting from a recent experience study.  See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs.  The increase was substantially offset by a decrease of $2.3 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses due to higher plant maintenance costs in 2011.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates for the first quarters 2012 and 2011 were 40.2% and 35%, respectively.  The difference in the effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2012 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$16
$1,216
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
61,339
(52,784)
Investing activities
(43,489)
(35,582)
Financing activities
(2,770)
88,366
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
15,080
-
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$15,096
$1,216

Operating Activities

Entergy Mississippi’s operating activities provided $61.3 million in cash for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to using $52.8 million in cash for the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to:
·
the purchase in 2011 of $42.6 million of fuel oil from System Fuels because System Fuels will no longer procure fuel oil for the Utility companies;
·
an increase in the recovery of fuel costs due to System Agreement bandwidth remedy payments of $33 million received in January 2012 as a result of receipts required to implement the FERC’s remedy in an October 2011 order for the period June-December 2005.  See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the System Agreement proceedings; and
·
a decrease of $14.6 million in pension contributions.  See “MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
103

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Investing Activities

Cash flow used in investing activities increased $7.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to money pool activity and the repayment by System Fuels of Entergy Mississippi’s $5.5 million investment in System Fuels in 2011, partially offset by decreased transmission construction expenditures resulting from additional transmission reliability work in 2011.

Increases in Entergy Mississippi’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi’s receivable from the money pool increased $8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.  The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.

Financing Activities

Entergy Mississippi’s financing activities used $2.8 million of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to providing $88.4 million of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to money pool activity.

Decreases in Entergy Mississippi’s payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi’s payable to the money pool decreased by $2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to increasing by $92.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Capital Structure

Entergy Mississippi’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Debt to capital
51.0%
51.2%
Effect of subtracting cash
(0.4)%
0.0%
Net debt to net capital
50.6%
51.2%

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and common equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Mississippi uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Mississippi’s financial condition.

Uses and Sources of Capital

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s uses and sources of capital.  Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy Mississippi’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
March 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
(In Thousands)
$7,978
($1,999)
($125,702)
($33,255)

See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
104

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis



Entergy Mississippi has three separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $70 million scheduled to expire in May 2012.  Entergy Mississippi expects to renew all of its credit facilities prior to expiration.  No borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of March 31, 2012.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.

Hinds Energy Facility Purchase Agreement

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Mississippi’s agreement to acquire the Hinds Energy Facility.  In July 2011, Entergy Mississippi filed with the MPSC requesting approval of the acquisition and full cost recovery.  The parties have satisfied their obligations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, and the U.S. Department of Justice’s review of the transaction is ongoing.  In February 2012 the MPSC granted a certificate of public convenience and necessity and approved the estimated acquisition cost.  In April 2012, facilities studies were issued indicating that long-term transmission service is available for the Hinds facility provided that supplemental transmission upgrades estimated at approximately $580,000 are made and assuming that various projects already included in the transmission construction plan are completed.  The retail cost recovery proceeding remains pending before the MPSC.  Assuming timely regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of all other closing conditions, closing is targeted for around mid-2012.

State and Local Rate Regulation

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - State and Local Rate Regulation " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan and fuel and purchased power cost recovery. Following is an update to that discussion.

In March 2012, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2011 test year filing.  The filing shows an earned return on common equity of 10.92% for the test year, which is within the earnings bandwidth and results in no change in rates.  The filing is currently subject to MPSC review.

Federal Regulation

See " System Agreement " and " Independent Coordinator of Transmission " in the " Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation " section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Mississippi’s accounting for unbilled revenue and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.



INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$ 261,760 $ 288,983
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale
84,559 81,306
Purchased power
65,428 75,134
Other operation and maintenance
48,336 48,007
Taxes other than income taxes
18,784 17,171
Depreciation and amortization
23,787 22,987
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
(7,472 ) 7,092
TOTAL
233,422 251,697
OPERATING INCOME
28,338 37,286
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,165 2,094
Interest and investment income
10 51
Miscellaneous - net
(1,055 ) (554 )
TOTAL
120 1,591
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
14,545 13,403
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(616 ) (1,165 )
TOTAL
13,929 12,238
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
14,529 26,639
Income taxes
5,847 9,325
NET INCOME
8,682 17,314
Preferred dividend requirements
707 707
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO
COMMON STOCK
$ 7,975 $ 16,607
See Notes to Financial Statements.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$ 8,682 $ 17,314
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
23,787 22,987
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
(8,348 ) 3,224
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
56,711 7,730
Fuel inventory
(1,861 ) (44,456 )
Accounts payable
(16,700 ) (10,394 )
Taxes accrued
(14,046 ) (26,605 )
Interest accrued
(4,633 ) (532 )
Deferred fuel costs
26,247 7,564
Other working capital accounts
4,981 (3,430 )
Provisions for estimated losses
196 73
Other regulatory assets
(6,491 ) (6,888 )
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(2,793 ) (17,311 )
Other assets and liabilities
(4,393 ) (2,060 )
Net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
61,339 (52,784 )
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(36,664 ) (43,192 )
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,165 2,094
Change in money pool receivable - net
(7,978 ) -
Investments in affiliates
- 5,527
Other
(12 ) (11 )
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(43,489 ) (35,582 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Change in money pool payable - net
(1,999 ) 92,447
Dividends paid:
Common stock
- (3,300 )
Preferred stock
(707 ) (707 )
Other
(64 ) (74 )
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
(2,770 ) 88,366
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
15,080 -
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
16 1,216
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 15,096 $ 1,216
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$ 18,522 $ 13,270
Income taxes
$ (8,407 ) $ -
See Notes to Financial Statements.



BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$ 1,098 $ 7
Temporary cash investments
13,998 9
Total cash and cash equivalents
15,096 16
Accounts receivable:
Customer
51,890 51,026
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(891 ) (756 )
Associated companies
15,952 51,329
Other
5,478 13,924
Accrued unbilled revenues
32,729 38,368
Total accounts receivable
105,158 153,891
Accumulated deferred income taxes
9,003 11,694
Fuel inventory - at average cost
44,360 42,499
Materials and supplies - at average cost
35,999 35,716
Prepayments and other
5,400 4,666
TOTAL
215,016 248,482
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
4,718 4,725
Storm reserve escrow account
31,856 31,844
TOTAL
36,574 36,569
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
3,324,825 3,274,031
Property under capital lease
10,081 10,721
Construction work in progress
81,293 105,083
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
3,416,199 3,389,835
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,226,856 1,210,092
UTILITY PLANT - NET
2,189,343 2,179,743
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
64,781 65,196
Other regulatory assets
401,399 393,387
Other
22,066 20,017
TOTAL
488,246 478,600
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 2,929,179 $ 2,943,394
See Notes to Financial Statements.



ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$ 100,000 $ -
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
33,533 46,311
Other
32,412 41,489
Customer deposits
69,426 68,610
Taxes accrued
31,490 45,536
Interest accrued
16,917 21,550
Deferred fuel costs
42,088 15,841
Other
22,713 17,474
TOTAL
348,579 256,811
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
660,952 672,129
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
6,686 6,372
Obligations under capital lease
7,430 8,112
Asset retirement cost liabilities
5,781 5,697
Accumulated provisions
38,485 38,289
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
141,281 144,088
Long-term debt
820,454 920,439
Other
5,469 5,370
TOTAL
1,686,538 1,800,496
Commitments and Contingencies
Preferred stock without sinking fund
50,381 50,381
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 12,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding 8,666,357 shares in 2012 and 2011
199,326 199,326
Capital stock expense and other
(690 ) (690 )
Retained earnings
645,045 637,070
TOTAL
843,681 835,706
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 2,929,179 $ 2,943,394
See Notes to Financial Statements.



STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited) (In Thousands)
Common Equity
Common Stock
Capital Stock Expense and Other
Retained Earnings
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
$ 199,326 $ (690 ) $ 534,469 $ 733,105
Net income
- - 17,314 17,314
Common stock dividends
- - (3,300 ) (3,300 )
Preferred stock dividends
- - (707 ) (707 )
Balance at March 31, 2011
$ 199,326 $ (690 ) $ 547,776 $ 746,412
Balance at December 31, 2011
$ 199,326 $ (690 ) $ 637,070 $ 835,706
Net income
- - 8,682 8,682
Preferred stock dividends
- - (707 ) (707 )
Balance at March 31, 2012
$ 199,326 $ (690 ) $ 645,045 $ 843,681
See Notes to Financial Statements.



SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Increase/
Description
2012
2011
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$ 109 $ 125 (16 ) (13 )
Commercial
92 95 (3 ) (3 )
Industrial
35 36 (1 ) (3 )
Governmental
9 9 - -
Total retail
245 265 (20 ) (8 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
4 16 (12 ) (75 )
Non-associated companies
5 5 - -
Other
8 3 5 167
Total
$ 262 $ 289 $ (27 ) (9 )
Billed Electric Energy
Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,245 1,442 (197 ) (14 )
Commercial
1,114 1,124 (10 ) (1 )
Industrial
546 539 7 1
Governmental
93 95 (2 ) (2 )
Total retail
2,998 3,200 (202 ) (6 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
25 170 (145 ) (85 )
Non-associated companies
29 52 (23 ) (44 )
Total
3,052 3,422 (370 ) (11 )




MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business

See the “ Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business ” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s plan to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp., including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Net income decreased $8.9 million primarily due to lower net revenue and higher other operation and maintenance expenses.

Net Revenue

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges.  Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue comparing the first quarter 2012 to the first quarter 2011.

Amount
(In Millions)
2011 net revenue
$64.0
Net gas revenue
(4.5)
Volume/weather
(3.3)
Retail electric price
(1.8)
Other
(0.6)
2012 net revenue
$53.8

The net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather, primarily in the residential sector, as compared to last year.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 79 GWh, or 7%, in billed electricity usage, primarily in the residential sector due to milder weather as compared to last year.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan decrease effective October 2011.  See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing.

Gross operating revenues and fuel expenses

Gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to:

·
a decrease of $13.7 million in gross gas revenues primarily due to lower fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of lower fuel rates and the effect of milder weather;
·
a decrease in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliate customers; and
·
less favorable volume/weather, as discussed above.

Fuel expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in demand for gas-fired generation and a decrease in the market price of natural gas.

112

Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Other Income Statement Variances

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $4 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses due to higher plant outage costs in 2012 due to a greater scope of work at the Michoud plant.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2012 was 83.8%.  The difference in the effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2012 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, provision for uncertain tax positions, and state income taxes.

The effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2011 was 36.8%.  The difference in the effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2011 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items and state income taxes, partially offset by flow-through tax accounting.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$9,834
$54,986
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
(6,726)
(2,854)
Investing activities
(7,128)
(16,053)
Financing activities
5,372
(5,906)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(8,482)
(24,813)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$1,352
$30,173

Operating Activities

Cash flow used in operating activities increased $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to decreased net income, partially offset by a decrease of $4.8 million in pension contributions.  See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $8.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to money pool activity and System Fuels’s repayment, in the first quarter 2011, of Entergy New Orleans’s $3.3 million investment in System Fuels.

Decreases in Entergy New Orleans’s receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy New Orleans’s receivable from the money pool decreased by $9.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to increasing by $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.


113

Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Financing Activities

Entergy New Orleans’s financing activities provided $5.4 million of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to using $5.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to money pool activity and a decrease of $3.9 million in common stock dividends paid.

Increases in Entergy New Orleans’s payable to the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy New Orleans’s payable to the money pool increased by $7.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Capital Structure

Entergy New Orleans’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Debt to capital
45.6%
45.3%
Effect of subtracting cash
(0.3)%
(1.5)%
Net debt to net capital
45.3%
43.8%

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and shareholders’ equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy New Orleans uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New Orleans’s financial condition.

Uses and Sources of Capital

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy New Orleans’s uses and sources of capital.  Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy New Orleans’s receivables from of (payables to) the money pool were as follows:

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
March 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
(In Thousands)
($7,353)
$9,074
$24,562
$21,820

See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

Entergy Louisiana’s Ninemile Point Unit 6 Self-Build Project

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s Ninemile Point Unit 6 self-build project.  The Ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% to Entergy Louisiana, 25% to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and 20% to Entergy New Orleans.  In February 2012 the City Council passed a resolution authorizing Entergy New Orleans to purchase 20% of the Ninemile 6 energy and capacity.  In June 2011, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by Entergy Louisiana’s construction of the facility.  Entergy Gulf States Louisiana joined in the application, seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of its allocated share of the capacity and energy generated by Ninemile 6.  In March 2012 the LPSC unanimously voted to grant the certifications requested by Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana has given the contractor a full notice to proceed with the construction.


114

Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


State and Local Rate Regulation

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation - State and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation.

Federal Regulation

See " System Agreement " and " Independent Coordinator of Transmission " in the " Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation " section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.

Environmental Risks

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Environmental Risks " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy New Orleans’s accounting for unbilled revenue and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.



INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$ 100,584 $ 115,990
Natural gas
28,572 42,266
TOTAL
129,156 158,256
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale
27,682 45,853
Purchased power
47,231 47,906
Other operation and maintenance
30,896 27,072
Taxes other than income taxes
10,548 11,021
Depreciation and amortization
9,069 8,992
Other regulatory charges - net
480 479
TOTAL
125,906 141,323
OPERATING INCOME
3,250 16,933
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
149 106
Interest and investment income
15 54
Miscellaneous - net
(405 ) (236 )
TOTAL
(241 ) (76 )
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
2,833 2,789
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(71 ) (48 )
TOTAL
2,762 2,741
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
247 14,116
Income taxes
207 5,189
NET INCOME
40 8,927
Preferred dividend requirements
241 241
EARNINGS (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO
COMMON STOCK
$ (201 ) $ 8,686
See Notes to Financial Statements.



STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$ 40 $ 8,927
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
9,069 8,992
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
(3,531 ) (8,709 )
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Receivables
2,182 4,665
Fuel inventory
1,423 (2,595 )
Accounts payable
(11,069 ) (13,865 )
Taxes accrued
1,116 9,040
Interest accrued
(1,128 ) (1,121 )
Deferred fuel costs
1,800 (2,182 )
Other working capital accounts
(11,241 ) (3,124 )
Provisions for estimated losses
746 2,328
Other regulatory assets
5,519 2,051
Pensions and other postretirement liabilities
(1,896 ) (6,804 )
Other assets and liabilities
244 (457 )
Net cash flow used in operating activities
(6,726 ) (2,854 )
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(14,938 ) (15,085 )
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
149 106
Change in money pool receivable - net
9,074 (2,742 )
Investment in affiliates
- 3,256
Changes in other investments - net
(1,413 ) (1,588 )
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(7,128 ) (16,053 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Change in money pool payable - net
7,353 -
Dividends paid:
Common stock
(1,700 ) (5,600 )
Preferred stock
(241 ) (241 )
Other
(40 ) (65 )
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
5,372 (5,906 )
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(8,482 ) (24,813 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
9,834 54,986
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 1,352 $ 30,173
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$ 3,719 $ 3,669
See Notes to Financial Statements.



BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash
$ 1,352 $ 486
Temporary cash investments
- 9,348
Total cash and cash equivalents
1,352 9,834
Accounts receivable:
Customer
31,013 29,038
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(410 ) (465 )
Associated companies
2,560 12,167
Other
2,081 2,603
Accrued unbilled revenues
13,866 17,023
Total accounts receivable
49,110 60,366
Accumulated deferred income taxes
5,622 6,419
Fuel inventory - at average cost
2,383 3,806
Materials and supplies - at average cost
9,798 9,392
Prepayments and other
12,192 2,679
TOTAL
80,457 92,496
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Non-utility property at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
1,016 1,016
Storm reserve escrow account
13,409 11,996
TOTAL
14,425 13,012
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
822,316 812,329
Natural gas
214,398 213,160
Construction work in progress
9,759 13,610
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
1,046,473 1,039,099
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
532,601 525,621
UTILITY PLANT - NET
513,872 513,478
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Deferred fuel costs
4,080 4,080
Other regulatory assets
173,781 178,815
Other
5,681 4,154
TOTAL
183,542 187,049
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 792,296 $ 806,035
See Notes to Financial Statements.


ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
$ 30,423 $ 27,042
Other
17,651 28,098
Customer deposits
21,779 21,878
Taxes accrued
1,116 -
Interest accrued
1,712 2,840
Deferred fuel costs
13,421 11,621
Other
2,974 4,197
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
89,076 95,676
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
143,542 144,405
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
1,479 1,539
Regulatory liability for income taxes - net
30,142 33,258
Other regulatory liabilities
8,513 5,726
Asset retirement cost liabilities
2,163 2,893
Accumulated provisions
16,589 15,843
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
72,121 74,017
Long-term debt
166,515 166,537
Gas system rebuild insurance proceeds
53,635 55,707
Other
9,477 9,489
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
504,176 509,414
Commitments and Contingencies
Preferred stock without sinking fund
19,780 19,780
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, $4 par value, authorized 10,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding 8,435,900 shares in 2012
and 2011
33,744 33,744
Paid-in capital
36,294 36,294
Retained earnings
109,226 111,127
TOTAL
179,264 181,165
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 792,296 $ 806,035
See Notes to Financial Statements.


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited) (In Thousands)
Common Equity
Common Stock
Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
$ 33,744 $ 36,294 $ 118,116 $ 188,154
Net income
- - 8,927 8,927
Common stock dividends
- - (5,600 ) (5,600 )
Preferred stock dividends
- - (241 ) (241 )
Balance at March 31, 2011
$ 33,744 $ 36,294 $ 121,202 $ 191,240
Balance at December 31, 2011
$ 33,744 $ 36,294 $ 111,127 $ 181,165
Net income
- - 40 40
Common stock dividends
- - (1,700 ) (1,700 )
Preferred stock dividends
- - (241 ) (241 )
Balance at March 31, 2012
$ 33,744 $ 36,294 $ 109,226 $ 179,264
See Notes to Financial Statements.

SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Increase/
Description
2012
2011
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$ 35 $ 41 $ (6 ) (14 )
Commercial
36 35 1 3
Industrial
7 7 - -
Governmental
14 14 - -
Total retail
92 97 (5 ) (5 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
7 18 (11 ) (61 )
Other
2 1 1 100
Total
$ 101 $ 116 $ (15 ) (13 )
Billed Electric Energy
Sales (GWh):
Residential
383 467 (84 ) (18 )
Commercial
447 439 8 2
Industrial
111 112 (1 ) (1 )
Governmental
181 183 (2 ) (1 )
Total retail
1,122 1,201 (79 ) (7 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
139 317 (178 ) (56 )
Non-associated companies
1 6 (5 ) (83 )
Total
1,262 1,524 (262 ) (17 )



MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business

See the “ Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business ” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy’s plan to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp., including the planned retirement of debt.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Net income decreased $14 million primarily due to lower net revenue and higher other operation and maintenance expenses.

Net Revenue

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).  Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the first quarter 2012 to the first quarter 2011.

Amount
(In Millions)
2011 net revenue
$127.2
Volume/weather
(9.3)
Purchased power capacity
(5.6)
Retail electric price
1.6
Reserve equalization
3.1
Other
0.4
2012 net revenue
$117.4

The volume/weather variance is primarily due a decrease of 256 GWh, or 7%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of milder weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year.

The purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $9 million base rate increase beginning May 2011 as a result of the settlement of the December 2009 rate case.

The reserve equalization variance is primarily due to decreased reserve equalization expense as a result of changes in the Entergy System generation mix compared to the same period in 2011.



122

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Gross operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory charges (credits)

Gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $14.5 million in gross wholesale revenues as a result of a decrease in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers and a decrease of $12.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues primarily attributable to lower fuel rates and lower usage, offset by lower interim fuel refunds in 2012 versus 2011.  The interim fuel refunds and the PUCT approvals are discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K.

Fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power, partially offset by an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of lower interim fuel refunds in 2012 versus 2011, offset by lower fuel revenues, as discussed above.

Other regulatory charges increased primarily due to the distribution in the first quarter 2011 of $17.4 million to customers of the 2007 rough production cost equalization remedy receipts.  See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the rough production cost equalization proceedings.

Other Income Statement Variances

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $7.1 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses due to a greater scope of work and an additional outage in 2012 compared to 2011.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates for the first quarter of 2012 and 2011 were 53.3% and 37.9%, respectively.  The differences in the effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2012 and 2011 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items and state income taxes, partially offset by the amortization of investment tax credits and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$65,289
$35,342
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
78,976
(11,003)
Investing activities
(22,265)
(7,787)
Financing activities
(22,358)
(14,783)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
34,353
(33,573)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$99,642
$1,769

Operating Activities

Entergy Texas’s operating activities provided $79 million in cash for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to using $11 million in cash for the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to:

·
an increase in the recovery of fuel costs due to System Agreement bandwidth remedy payments of $43 million received in January 2012 as a result of receipts required to implement the FERC’s remedy in an October 2011 order for the period June-December 2005.  See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the System Agreement proceedings; and
·
$35.8 million of fuel cost refunds in the first quarter 2012 compared to $57.9 million of fuel cost refunds in the first quarter 2011.  See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for discussion of the fuel cost refunds.
123

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities increased $14.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to higher fossil-fueled generation construction expenses due to a greater scope of projects in 2012 and money pool activity.

Decreases in Entergy Texas’s receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Texas’s receivable from the money pool decreased by $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to decreasing by $13.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce Entergy’s subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.

Financing Activities

Net cash flow used in financing activities increased $7.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to money pool activity.

Increases in Entergy Texas’s payable to the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Texas’s payable to the money pool increased by $6.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Capital Structure

Entergy Texas’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Debt to capital
64.8%
65.1%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds
(14.1)%
(14.3)%
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)
50.7%
50.8%
Effect of subtracting cash
(2.8)%
(1.9)%
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)
47.9%
48.9%

(1)
Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Texas.

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion and the debt assumption liability.  Capital consists of debt and shareholder’s equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  Entergy Texas uses the net debt to net capital ratio and the ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas’s financial condition.

Uses and Sources of Capital

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Texas’s uses and sources of capital.  Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
124

Entergy Texas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Entergy Texas’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
March 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
(In Thousands)
$56,007
$63,191
($6,310)
$13,672
See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

Entergy Texas has a credit facility in the amount of $150 million scheduled to expire in March 2017.  No borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of March 31, 2012.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facility.

State and Local Rate Regulation

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - State and Local Rate Regulation " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation.  Following are updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the rate case that Entergy Texas filed in November 2011 requesting a $112 million base rate increase reflecting a 10.6% return on common equity based on an adjusted June 2011 test year. On April 3, 2012 the PUCT Staff filed direct testimony recommending a base rate increase of $66 million and a 9.6% return on common equity. The PUCT Staff, however, subsequently filed a statement of position in the proceeding indicating that it was still evaluating the position it will ultimately take in the case regarding the Entergy Texas’s recovery of purchased power capacity costs and Entergy Texas’s proposal to defer its MISO transition expenses. On April 13, 2012, Entergy Texas filed rebuttal testimony indicating a revised request for a $105 million base rate increase.  A hearing was held in late-April through early-May 2012 and a decision is pending.

In December 2011, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to refund approximately $43 million, including interest, of fuel cost recovery over-collections through October 2011.  Entergy Texas and the parties to the proceeding reached an agreement that Entergy Texas will refund $67 million, including interest and additional over-recoveries through December 2011, over a three-month period.  Entergy Texas and the parties requested that interim rates consistent with the settlement be approved effective with the March 2012 billing month, and the PUCT approved the application in March 2012.

Federal Regulation

See " System Agreement " and " Independent Coordinator of Transmission " in the " Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation " section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.

Environmental Risks

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Environmental Risks " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the unbilled revenue and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.




CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$ 326,924 $ 348,884
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale
44,038 44,081
Purchased power
152,123 180,664
Other operation and maintenance
55,823 47,241
Taxes other than income taxes
15,794 14,857
Depreciation and amortization
20,727 19,526
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
13,356 (3,078 )
TOTAL
301,861 303,291
OPERATING INCOME
25,063 45,593
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,089 766
Interest and investment income
1,460 690
Miscellaneous - net
(795 ) (175 )
TOTAL
1,754 1,281
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
23,810 22,077
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(726 ) (526 )
TOTAL
23,084 21,551
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
3,733 25,323
Income taxes
1,988 9,597
NET INCOME
$ 1,745 $ 15,726
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$ 1,745 $ 15,726
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
20,727 19,526
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
3,184 14,340
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
82,506 8,252
Fuel inventory
(7,173 ) 248
Accounts payable
(10,370 ) 6,120
Taxes accrued
(17,324 ) (15,502 )
Interest accrued
(8,608 ) (8,202 )
Deferred fuel costs
9,213 (36,287 )
Other working capital accounts
(3,131 ) 3,473
Provisions for estimated losses
(192 ) 44
Other regulatory assets
18,716 13,749
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
(3,097 ) (9,439 )
Other assets and liabilities
(7,220 ) (23,051 )
Net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
78,976 (11,003 )
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(42,162 ) (32,295 )
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
1,089 766
Change in money pool receivable - net
7,184 13,672
Remittances to transition charge account
(19,070 ) (20,440 )
Payments from transition charge account
30,694 30,510
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(22,265 ) (7,787 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Retirement of long-term debt
(21,670 ) (21,086 )
Change in money pool payable - net
- 6,310
Other
(688 ) (7 )
Net cash flow used in financing activities
(22,358 ) (14,783 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
34,353 (33,573 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
65,289 35,342
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 99,642 $ 1,769
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$ 31,320 $ 29,194
Income taxes
$ - $ (4,500 )
See Notes to Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$ 1,400 $ 150
Temporary cash investments
98,242 65,139
Total cash and cash equivalents
99,642 65,289
Securitization recovery trust account
29,591 41,215
Accounts receivable:
Customer
34,625 68,290
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(695 ) (1,461 )
Associated companies
79,474 129,561
Other
8,769 9,573
Accrued unbilled revenues
35,673 41,573
Total accounts receivable
157,846 247,536
Accumulated deferred income taxes
77,789 88,436
Fuel inventory - at average cost
61,057 53,884
Materials and supplies - at average cost
29,964 29,810
Prepayments and other
11,390 15,203
TOTAL
467,279 541,373
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investments in affiliates - at equity
778 783
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
857 930
Other
18,512 17,969
TOTAL
20,147 19,682
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
3,386,237 3,338,608
Construction work in progress
76,543 90,856
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
3,462,780 3,429,464
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,300,161 1,289,166
UTILITY PLANT - NET
2,162,619 2,140,298
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
129,311 129,924
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property
of $693,916 as of March 31, 2012 and
$704,896 as of December 31, 2011)
1,164,392 1,178,067
Long-term receivables - associated companies
30,717 31,254
Other
21,974 18,408
TOTAL
1,346,394 1,357,653
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 3,996,439 $ 4,059,006
See Notes to Financial Statements.



ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
$ 70,096 $ 60,583
Other
50,430 69,160
Customer deposits
38,240 38,294
Taxes accrued
22,987 40,311
Interest accrued
24,487 33,095
Deferred fuel costs
73,877 64,664
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
1,023 1,029
System agreement cost equalization
37,407 43,290
Other
3,994 4,847
TOTAL
322,541 355,273
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
927,864 934,990
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
18,940 19,339
Other regulatory liabilities
12,094 11,710
Asset retirement cost liabilities
3,927 3,870
Accumulated provisions
4,832 5,024
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
134,644 137,735
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of
$728,010 as of March 31, 2012 and
$749,673 as of December 31, 2011)
1,655,569 1,677,127
Other
14,928 14,583
TOTAL
2,772,798 2,804,378
Commitments and Contingencies
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 46,525,000 shares in 2012 and 2011
49,452 49,452
Paid-in capital
481,994 481,994
Retained earnings
369,654 367,909
TOTAL
901,100 899,355
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 3,996,439 $ 4,059,006
See Notes to Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited) (In Thousands)
Common Equity
Common Stock
Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
$ 49,452 $ 481,994 $ 292,844 $ 824,290
Net income
- - 15,726 15,726
Balance at March 31, 2011
$ 49,452 $ 481,994 $ 308,570 $ 840,016
Balance at December 31, 2011
$ 49,452 $ 481,994 $ 367,909 $ 899,355
Net income
- - 1,745 1,745
Balance at March 31, 2012
$ 49,452 $ 481,994 $ 369,654 $ 901,100
See Notes to Financial Statements.



SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Increase/
Description
2012
2011
(Decrease)
%
(Dollars In Millions)
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential
$ 117 $ 126 $ (9 ) (7 )
Commercial
77 73 4 5
Industrial
63 63 0 -
Governmental
6 5 1 20
Total retail
263 267 (4 ) (1 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
52 55 (3 ) (5 )
Non-associated companies
8 20 (12 ) (60 )
Other
4 7 (3 ) (43 )
Total
$ 327 $ 349 $ (22 ) (6 )
Billed Electric Energy
Sales (GWh):
Residential
1,195 1,383 (188 ) (14 )
Commercial
974 991 (17 ) (2 )
Industrial
1,399 1,448 (49 ) (3 )
Governmental
67 69 (2 ) (3 )
Total retail
3,635 3,891 (256 ) (7 )
Sales for resale:
Associated companies
730 828 (98 ) (12 )
Non-associated companies
256 321 (65 ) (20 )
Total
4,621 5,040 (419 ) (8 )




MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Results of Operations

System Energy’s principal asset consists of a 78.5% ownership interest and 11.5% leasehold interest in Grand Gulf.  The capacity and energy from its 90% interest is sold under the Unit Power Sales Agreement to its only four customers, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans.  System Energy’s operating revenues are derived from the allocation of the capacity, energy, and related costs associated with its 90% interest in Grand Gulf pursuant to the Unit Power Sales Agreement.  Payments under the Unit Power Sales Agreement are System Energy’s only source of operating revenues.

Net income increased $7.2 million primarily due to higher other income and lower interest expense.  Other income was higher and interest expense was lower due to AFUDC accrued on the Grand Gulf uprate project.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

2012
2011
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$185,157
$263,772
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities
67,536
57,634
Investing activities
(218,619)
(115,470)
Financing activities
49,106
(80,629)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(101,977)
(138,465)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$83,180
$125,307

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $9.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease of $13.6 million in pension contributions.  See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased $103.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to an increase of $125.2 million in nuclear fuel purchases primarily due to the 2012 Grand Gulf refueling outage and an increase in construction expenditures resulting primarily from spending on the power uprate project at Grand Gulf.  The increase was partially offset by money pool activity and a $22 million loan in 2011 to an affiliate under an intercompany credit agreement between Entergy New Nuclear Development, LLC (a subsidiary of System Energy) and Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing. The loan was repaid in early-May 2011.

132

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


Decreases in System Energy’s receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and System Energy’s receivable from the money pool decreased $73.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to increasing $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.

Financing Activities

System Energy’s financing activities provided $49.1 million of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to using $80.6 million of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to the issuance of $69.2 million in commercial paper in the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to the repayment of $22.3 million in commercial paper in the same period in 2011 as well as $50 million of 4.02% Series H notes issued by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity in February 2012.  See Note 4 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of this activity.  These increases were partially offset by an increase in common stock dividend payments.

Capital Structure

System Energy’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Debt to capital
48.7%
48.3%
Effect of subtracting cash
(2.9)%
(7.1)%
Net debt to net capital
45.8%
41.2%

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents.  Debt consists of notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion.  Capital consists of debt and common shareholder’s equity.  Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.  System Energy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy’s financial condition.

Uses and Sources of Capital

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of System Energy’s uses and sources of capital.  Following are updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

As discussed in more detail in the Form 10-K, the estimated capital investments for 2012-2014 include System Energy’s planned approximate 178 MW uprate of the Grand Gulf nuclear plant.  Considering the progress of the uprate project during Grand Gulf’s spring 2012 refueling outage, including additional work scope that has emerged during the outage; additional information from the project's engineering, procurement and construction contractor; the costs required to install instrumentation in the steam dryer in response to evolving guidance from the NRC staff; and delays in obtaining NRC approval; System Energy now estimates the total capital investment to be made in the course of the implementation of the Grand Gulf uprate project is approximately $874 million, including SMEPA’s share.  Implementation of the uprate and the NRC’s review continues.  System Energy expects to complete the project during the summer of 2012.


133

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis


System Energy’s receivables from the money pool were as follows:

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
March 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
(In Thousands)
$47,129
$120,424
$106,128
$97,948

See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

Nuclear Matters

See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Nuclear Matters " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.

Environmental Risks

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Environmental Risks " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in System Energy’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.


INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric
$ 126,034 $ 128,395
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale
10,361 19,690
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
4,164 4,022
Other operation and maintenance
34,284 28,957
Decommissioning
8,034 8,202
Taxes other than income taxes
5,513 5,423
Depreciation and amortization
29,674 28,663
Other regulatory credits - net
(1,452 ) (2,949 )
TOTAL
90,578 92,008
OPERATING INCOME
35,456 36,387
OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
9,469 4,145
Interest and investment income
3,526 2,541
Miscellaneous - net
(157 ) (104 )
TOTAL
12,838 6,582
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense
10,849 11,389
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
(2,777 ) (1,353 )
TOTAL
8,072 10,036
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
40,222 32,933
Income taxes
13,686 13,597
NET INCOME
$ 26,536 $ 19,336
See Notes to Financial Statements.










(Page left blank intentionally)


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$ 26,536 $ 19,336
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
45,391 50,981
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
45,966 (55,312 )
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
11,964 10,634
Accounts payable
8,260 8,932
Taxes accrued and prepaid taxes
(46,362 ) 53,904
Interest accrued
(2,300 ) (37,428 )
Other working capital accounts
(23,236 ) (2,101 )
Other regulatory assets
2,716 38,385
Pensions and other postretirement liabilities
(2,859 ) (16,279 )
Other assets and liabilities
1,460 (13,418 )
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
67,536 57,634
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction expenditures
(140,334 ) (52,796 )
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
9,469 4,145
Nuclear fuel purchases
(152,928 ) (27,759 )
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
125,431 88,605
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
(133,552 ) (97,485 )
Loan to affiliate
- (22,000 )
Changes in money pool receivable - net
73,295 (8,180 )
Net cash flow used in investing activities
(218,619 ) (115,470 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
50,000 -
Retirement of long-term debt
(39,892 ) (38,161 )
Changes in credit borrowings - net
69,179 (22,293 )
Dividends paid:
Common stock
(28,750 ) (18,700 )
Other
(1,431 ) (1,475 )
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
49,106 (80,629 )
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(101,977 ) (138,465 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
185,157 263,772
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 83,180 $ 125,307
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid/(received) during the period for:
Interest - net of amount capitalized
$ 9,805 $ 12,039
Income taxes
$ (1,020 ) $ -
See Notes to Financial Statements.



BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash
$ 542 $ 30,961
Temporary cash investments
82,638 154,196
Total cash and cash equivalents
83,180 185,157
Accounts receivable:
Associated companies
82,198 172,943
Other
12,780 7,294
Total accounts receivable
94,978 180,237
Materials and supplies - at average cost
81,279 86,333
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
32,348 9,479
Prepayments and other
6,285 1,111
TOTAL
298,070 462,317
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Decommissioning trust funds
459,942 423,409
TOTAL
459,942 423,409
UTILITY PLANT
Electric
3,413,227 3,438,424
Property under capital lease
491,023 491,023
Construction work in progress
567,482 357,826
Nuclear fuel
293,300 157,967
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
4,765,032 4,445,240
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
2,546,814 2,518,190
UTILITY PLANT - NET
2,218,218 1,927,050
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
127,141 124,777
Other regulatory assets
282,702 287,796
Other
18,939 20,016
TOTAL
428,782 432,589
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 3,405,012 $ 3,245,365
See Notes to Financial Statements.



SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
2012
2011
(In Thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt
$ 110,902 $ 110,163
Short-term borrowings
69,179 -
Accounts payable:
Associated companies
4,505 8,032
Other
120,230 63,331
Taxes accrued
46,093 92,455
Accumulated deferred income taxes
12,345 3,428
Interest accrued
15,476 17,776
Other
2,344 2,591
TOTAL
381,074 297,776
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
706,814 652,418
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
57,512 57,865
Other regulatory liabilities
224,723 214,745
Decommissioning
453,386 445,352
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
136,860 139,719
Long-term debt
646,273 636,885
Other
21 42
TOTAL
2,225,589 2,147,026
Commitments and Contingencies
COMMON EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2012 and 2011
789,350 789,350
Retained earnings
8,999 11,213
TOTAL
798,349 800,563
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 3,405,012 $ 3,245,365
See Notes to Financial Statements.



STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited) (In Thousands)
Common Equity
Common Stock
Retained Earnings
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
$ 789,350 $ 23,016 $ 812,366
Net income
- 19,336 19,336
Common stock dividends
- (18,700 ) (18,700 )
Balance at March 31, 2011
$ 789,350 $ 23,652 $ 813,002
Balance at December 31, 2011
$ 789,350 $ 11,213 $ 800,563
Net income
- 26,536 26,536
Common stock dividends
- (28,750 ) (28,750 )
Balance at March 31, 2012
$ 789,350 $ 8,999 $ 798,349
See Notes to Financial Statements.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


See " PART I, Item 1, Litigation " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of legal, administrative, and other regulatory proceedings affecting Entergy.  Following is an update to that discussion.  Also see "Item 5, Other Information, Environmental Regulation " , below, for updates regarding environmental proceedings and regulation.

Texas Power Price Lawsuit

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the lawsuit filed in August 2003 in the district court of Chambers County, Texas by Texas residents on behalf of a purported class apparently of the Texas retail customers of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. who were billed and paid for electric power from January 1, 1994 to the present.  The case is pending in state district court, and in March 2012 the court found that the case met the requirements to be maintained as a class action under Texas law.  On April 30, 2012, the court entered an order certifying the class.


There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in " PART I, Item 1A, Risk Factors " in the Form 10-K.


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (1)

Period
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid
per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of a
Publicly
Announced Plan
Maximum $
Amount
of Shares that May
Yet be Purchased
Under a Plan (2)
1/01/2012-1/31/2012
-
$-
-
$350,052,918
2/01/2012-2/29/2012
-
$-
-
$350,052,918
3/01/2012-3/31/2012
-
$-
-
$350,052,918
Total
-
$-
-

(1)
In accordance with Entergy’s stock-based compensation plans, Entergy periodically grants stock options to key employees, which may be exercised to obtain shares of Entergy’s common stock.  According to the plans, these shares can be newly issued shares, treasury stock, or shares purchased on the open market.  Entergy’s management has been authorized by the Board to repurchase on the open market shares up to an amount sufficient to fund the exercise of grants under the plans.  See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the stock-based compensation plans.  In addition to this authority, in October 2010 the Board granted authority for an additional $500 million share repurchase program.  The amount of share repurchases under these programs may vary as a result of material changes in business results or capital spending or new investment opportunities.  In addition, in the first quarter 2012, Entergy withheld 20,110 shares of its common stock at $70.62 per share to pay taxes due upon vesting of restricted stock granted as part of its long-term incentive program.
(2)
Maximum amount of shares that may yet be repurchased does not include an estimate of the amount of shares that may be purchased to fund the exercise of grants under the stock-based compensation plans.





Regulation of the Nuclear Power Industry

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982

Spent Nuclear Fuel

See the discussion in Part I, Item 1, in the Form 10-K for information regarding litigation against the U.S. Department of Energy.  Following is an update to that discussion.  In April 2012 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the appeal in the Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2 case.  In that decision, the Federal Circuit reversed certain damages awarded to Entergy, but also reversed the trial court's denial of certain overhead costs.  The revisions to the award reduced the net amount from approximately $106 million to approximately $103 million.  Management cannot predict the timing of eventual receipt from the DOE of this damage award and the damage awards discussed in the Form 10-K.

Environmental Regulation

Following are updates to the Environmental Regulation section of Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.

Clean Air Act and Subsequent Amendments

Regional Haze

In June 2005, the EPA issued final Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BART) regulations that could potentially result in a requirement to install SO 2 and NO x pollution control technology on certain of Entergy’s fossil-fueled generation units.  The rule leaves certain BART determinations to the states.  The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) prepared a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Arkansas facilities to implement its obligations under the Clean Air Visibility Rule.  The ADEQ determined that Entergy Arkansas’s White Bluff power plant affects a Class I Area’s visibility and will be subject to the EPA’s presumptive BART limits, which likely would require the installation of scrubbers and low NO x burners.  Under then-current state regulations, the scrubbers would have had to be operational by October 2013.  Entergy Arkansas filed a petition in December 2009 with the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission requesting a variance from this deadline because the EPA had expressed concerns about Arkansas’s Regional Haze SIP and questioned the appropriateness of issuing an air permit prior to that approval.  Entergy Arkansas’s petition requested that, consistent with federal law, the compliance deadline be changed to as expeditiously as practicable, but in no event later than five years after EPA approval of the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP.  The Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission approved the variance in March 2010.  In October 2011 the EPA released a proposed rule addressing the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP.  In the proposal the EPA disapproved a large portion of the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP, including the emission limits for NO x and SO 2 at White Bluff.  The final rule was published, substantially unchanged, and became final on April 11, 2012.  The EPA did not issue a Federal Implementation Plan for regional haze requirements because Arkansas has indicated it wishes to correct and resubmit its SIP.  There will be a two-year timeframe in which the EPA must either approve a SIP issued by Arkansas or issue a Federal Implementation Plan.

New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions

The EPA announced a schedule for establishing new source performance standards (NSPS) for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from power plants and refineries.  Under the schedule, the EPA would have issued proposed regulations for power plants by July 26, 2011 and final regulations no later than May 26, 2012.  On April 13, 2012, EPA published the proposed NSPS for GHGs for new sources.  According to the EPA, the proposed rule applies directly only to new units and would limit CO 2 emissions for any fossil-fired power plant greater than 25 MW to 1,000 pounds of CO 2 per MWh of electricity produced.  Concerns have been expressed regarding the proposed rule’s potential applicability to existing facilities that undergo modification. The rule would not apply to certain units such as simple-cycle natural gas units and biomass units.  Entergy will continue to monitor the rulemaking process.
Other Environmental Matters

Entergy

In November 2010 a transformer at the Indian Point facility failed, resulting in a fire and the release of non-PCB oil to the ground surface.  The fire was extinguished by the facility’s fire deluge system along with the site’s fire brigade.  No injuries occurred due to the transformer failure or Entergy’s response.  Non-PCB oil and deluge water were released into the facility’s discharge canal and the environment surrounding the transformer and discharge canal, including the Hudson River, as a result of the failure, fire, and fire suppression.  As a result of this discharge of non-PCB oil, Entergy in March 2012 agreed to a settlement with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation under which Entergy will pay a civil penalty consisting of a payment of $625,000, another $600,000 to be paid to environmental benefit programs in the region, and an additional payment of $275,000 that is suspended contingent upon Entergy’s compliance with the other terms of the settlement.  Entergy also paid $67,000 in natural resource damages and oversight costs.

Correction of Regulatory Asset for Income Taxes

As discussed in more detail in Note 2 to the financial statements, in the first quarter 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana determined that its regulatory asset for income taxes was overstated because of a difference between the regulatory treatment of the income taxes associated with certain items (primarily pension expense) and the financial accounting treatment of those taxes.  The effect was immaterial to the balance sheets, results of operations, and cash flows of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana for all prior reporting periods.  Correcting the cumulative effect of the error in the first quarter 2012 could have been material to the 2012 results of operations of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and, therefore, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana is revising its prior period financial statements to correct the errors.  The effect of the corrections on the Entergy Gulf States Louisiana financial statements presented in the Form 10-K is shown in the tables below:

Years Ended December 31,
2011
2010
2009
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
(In Thousands)
Income Statement
Income taxes
$88,313
$89,736
$75,878
$92,297
$89,185
$88,951
Net income
$203,027
$201,604
$190,738
$174,319
$153,047
$153,281
Earnings applicable to
common equity
$202,202
$200,779
$189,911
$173,492
$152,222
$152,456
Statement of Cash Flows
Net income
$203,027
$201,604
$190,738
$174,319
$153,047
$153,281
Deferred income taxes,
investment tax credits,
and non-current taxes
accrued
($6,268)
($4,845)
$87,920
$104,339
$138,817
$138,583
Changes in other
regulatory assets
($80,027)
($77,713)
$114,528
$141,216
($44,612)
($44,993)
Other operating
activities
($35,248)
($37,562)
$30,717
$4,029
($86,474)
($86,093)



December 31,
2011
2010
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
(In Thousands)
Balance Sheet
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
$249,058
$173,724
$234,406
$161,386
Accumulated deferred income taxes -
current
$5,427
$5,107
$1,749
$1,255
Accumulated deferred income taxes
and taxes accrued
$1,397,230
$1,368,563
$1,405,374
$1,377,772
Member’s equity
$1,439,733
$1,393,386
$1,539,517
$1,494,593


Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009
Member’s Equity
Total Equity
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
As
previously
reported
As
corrected
(In Thousands)
Statement of Changes in Equity
Balance at December 31, 2008
$1,352,408
$1,323,669
$1,332,143
$1,303,404
2009 Net income
$153,047
$153,281
$153,047
$153,281
Balance at December 31, 2009
$1,473,930
$1,445,425
$1,441,759
$1,413,254
2010 Net income
$190,738
$174,319
$190,738
$174,319
Balance at December 31, 2010
$1,539,517
$1,494,593
$1,509,213
$1,464,289
2011 Net income
$203,027
$201,604
$203,027
$201,604
Balance at December 31, 2011
$1,439,733
$1,393,386
$1,380,123
$1,333,776

Earnings Ratios (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

The Registrant Subsidiaries have calculated ratios of earnings to fixed charges and ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred dividends/distributions pursuant to Item 503 of Regulation S-K of the SEC as follows:

Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
March 31,
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Entergy Arkansas
3.19
2.33
2.39
3.91
4.31
4.12
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
2.84
2.44
2.99
3.58
4.36
4.08
Entergy Louisiana
3.44
3.14
3.52
3.41
1.86
1.71
Entergy Mississippi
3.22
2.92
3.31
3.35
3.55
3.28
Entergy New Orleans
2.74
3.71
3.61
4.43
5.37
4.20
Entergy Texas
2.07
2.04
1.92
2.10
2.34
2.10
System Energy
3.95
3.29
3.73
3.64
3.85
4.03


Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
and Preferred Dividends/Distributions
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
March 31,
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Entergy Arkansas
2.88
1.95
2.09
3.60
3.83
3.65
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
2.73
2.42
2.95
3.54
4.30
4.02
Entergy Louisiana
3.08
2.87
3.27
3.19
1.70
1.57
Entergy Mississippi
2.97
2.67
3.06
3.16
3.27
3.03
Entergy New Orleans
2.54
3.45
3.33
4.08
4.74
3.71

The Registrant Subsidiaries accrue interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense and do not include it in fixed charges.


*
4(a) -
Credit Agreement ($3,500,000,000), dated March 9, 2012, among Entergy Corporation, as borrower, the banks (Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, KeyBank National Association, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, BNP Paribas, Bank of the West, The Bank of New York Mellon, CoBank, ACB, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Regions Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, SunTrust Bank, National Cooperative Services Corporation, and The Northern Trust Company), Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and LC Issuing Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Mizuho Corporate Bank, LTD, The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD, and Union Bank, N.A., as LC Issuing Banks, and the other LC Issuing Banks from time to time parties thereto (4.1 to Form 8-K filed March 14, 2012 in 1-11299).
*
4(b) -
Credit Agreement ($150,000,000), dated March 9, 2012, among Entergy Arkansas, Inc., as borrower, the banks (Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, KeyBank National Association, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, BNP Paribas, The Bank of New York Mellon, CoBank, ACB, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Regions Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, SunTrust Bank, and National Cooperative Services Corporation), Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and LC Issuing Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Mizuho Corporate Bank, LTD, The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD, and Union Bank, N.A., as LC Issuing Banks, and the other LC Issuing Banks from time to time parties thereto (4.2 to Form 8-K filed March 14, 2012 in 1-10764).
*
4(c) -
Credit Agreement ($150,000,000), dated March 9, 2012, among Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., as borrower, the banks (Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, KeyBank National Association, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, BNP Paribas, The Bank of New York Mellon, CoBank, ACB, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Regions Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, SunTrust Bank, and National Cooperative Services Corporation), Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and LC Issuing Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Mizuho Corporate Bank, LTD, The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD, and Union Bank, N.A., as LC Issuing Banks, and the other LC Issuing Banks from time to time parties thereto (4.3 to Form 8-K filed March 14, 2012 in 0-20371).
*
4(d) -
Credit Agreement ($200,000,000), dated March 9, 2012, among Entergy Louisiana, LLC, as borrower, the banks (Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, KeyBank National Association, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, BNP Paribas, The Bank of New York Mellon, CoBank, ACB, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Regions Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, SunTrust Bank, and National Cooperative Services Corporation), Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and LC Issuing Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Mizuho Corporate Bank, LTD, The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD, and Union Bank, N.A., as LC Issuing Banks, and the other LC Issuing Banks from time to time parties thereto (4.4 to Form 8-K filed March 14, 2012 in 1-32718).
*
4(e) -
Credit Agreement ($150,000,000), dated March 9, 2012, among Entergy Texas, Inc., as borrower, the banks (Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, KeyBank National Association, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, BNP Paribas, The Bank of New York Mellon, CoBank, ACB, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Regions Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, SunTrust Bank, and National Cooperative Services Corporation), Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and LC Issuing Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Mizuho Corporate Bank, LTD, The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD, and Union Bank, N.A., as LC Issuing Banks, and the other LC Issuing Banks from time to time parties thereto (4.5 to Form 8-K filed March 14, 2012 in 1-34360).
12(a) -
Entergy Arkansas’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.
12(b) -
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as defined.
12(c) -
Entergy Louisiana’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as defined.
12(d) -
Entergy Mississippi’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.
12(e) -
Entergy New Orleans’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Pre­ferred Dividends, as defined.
12(f) -
Entergy Texas’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as defined.
12(g) -
System Energy’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as defined.
31(a) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation.
31(b) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation.
31(c) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
31(d) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
31(e) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
31(f) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
31(g) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
31(h) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
31(i) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
31(j) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
31(k) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
31(l) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
31(m) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
31(n) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
31(o) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
31(p) -
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
32(a) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
32(b) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
32(c) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
32(d) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
32(e) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
32(f) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
32(g) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
32(h) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
32(i) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
32(j) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
32(k) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
32(l) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
32(m) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
32(n) -
Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
32(o) -
Section 1350 Certification for System Energy.
32(p) -
Section 1350 Certification for System Energy.
101 INS -
XBRL Instance Document.
101 SCH -
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101 PRE -
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
101 LAB -
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
101 CAL -
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
101 DEF -
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
___________________________

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Entergy Corporation agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt that is not registered or listed herein as an Exhibit because the total amount of securities authorized under such agreement does not exceed ten percent of the total assets of Entergy Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

*
Incorporated herein by reference as indicated.




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.  The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiaries.

ENTERGY CORPORATION
ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.
SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
/s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(For each Registrant and for each as
Principal Accounting Officer)


Date:           May 8, 2012



149


TABLE OF CONTENTS