FRANKLIN COVEY CO
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
[X]
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended November 27, 2010
|
|
[ ]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission file no. 1-11107
FRANKLIN COVEY CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Utah
(State of incorporation)
|
87-0401551
(I.R.S. employer identification number)
|
|
|
2200 West Parkway Boulevard
Salt Lake City, Utah
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
84119-2099
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
Registrant’s telephone number,
Including area code
|
(801) 817-1776
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
T
No
£
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
£
No
£
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer
|
£
|
Accelerated filer
|
T
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
£
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
£
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
£
No
T
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock as of the latest practicable date:
17,046,443 shares of Common Stock as of January 1, 2011
FRANKLIN COVEY CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
November 27,
2010
|
August 31,
2010
|
|||||||
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 1,704 | $ | 3,484 | ||||
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $740 and $718
|
35,959 | 30,665 | ||||||
|
Inventories
|
3,973 | 4,470 | ||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
2,545 | 2,543 | ||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
7,430 | 7,454 | ||||||
|
Total current assets
|
51,611 | 48,616 | ||||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
19,806 | 20,330 | ||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
64,310 | 65,240 | ||||||
|
Goodwill
|
3,761 | 3,761 | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
9,901 | 9,396 | ||||||
| $ | 149,389 | $ | 147,343 | |||||
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Current portion of financing obligation
|
$ | 764 | $ | 734 | ||||
|
Line of credit
|
11,348 | 9,532 | ||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
8,131 | 6,847 | ||||||
|
Income taxes payable
|
647 | 198 | ||||||
|
Accrued liabilities
|
22,855 | 26,743 | ||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
43,745 | 44,054 | ||||||
|
Financing obligation, less current portion
|
30,158 | 30,364 | ||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
262 | 253 | ||||||
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
2,889 | 1,637 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
77,054 | 76,308 | ||||||
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
|
Common stock – $0.05 par value; 40,000 shares authorized, 27,056 shares issued and outstanding
|
1,353 | 1,353 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
183,857 | 183,794 | ||||||
|
Common stock warrants
|
7,597 | 7,597 | ||||||
|
Retained earnings
|
14,256 | 13,462 | ||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
3,066 | 3,014 | ||||||
|
Treasury stock at cost, 10,013 and 10,041 shares
|
(137,794 | ) | (138,185 | ) | ||||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
72,335 | 71,035 | ||||||
| $ | 149,389 | $ | 147,343 | |||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FRANKLIN COVEY CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
November 27,
2010
|
November 28,
2009
|
|||||||
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
|
Net sales:
|
||||||||
|
Training and consulting services
|
$ | 37,555 | $ | 30,257 | ||||
|
Products
|
1,276 | 871 | ||||||
|
Leasing
|
585 | 798 | ||||||
| 39,416 | 31,926 | |||||||
|
Cost of sales:
|
||||||||
|
Training and consulting services
|
13,250 | 10,381 | ||||||
|
Products
|
681 | 531 | ||||||
|
Leasing
|
409 | 394 | ||||||
| 14,340 | 11,306 | |||||||
|
Gross profit
|
25,076 | 20,620 | ||||||
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
19,789 | 17,275 | ||||||
|
Depreciation
|
910 | 974 | ||||||
|
Amortization
|
929 | 962 | ||||||
|
Income from operations
|
3,448 | 1,409 | ||||||
|
Interest income
|
4 | 3 | ||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(711 | ) | (718 | ) | ||||
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
2,741 | 694 | ||||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
(1,947 | ) | (578 | ) | ||||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
794 | 116 | ||||||
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
- | 132 | ||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 794 | $ | 248 | ||||
|
Income from continuing operations per share:
|
||||||||
|
Basic and diluted
|
$ | .05 | $ | .00 | ||||
|
Net income per share:
|
||||||||
|
Basic and diluted
|
$ | .05 | $ | .01 | ||||
|
Weighted average number of common shares:
|
||||||||
|
Basic
|
17,032 | 16,958 | ||||||
|
Diluted
|
17,115 | 17,050 | ||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FRANKLIN COVEY CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
November 27,
2010
|
November 28,
2009
|
|||||||
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 794 | $ | 248 | ||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
1,839 | 1,936 | ||||||
|
Amortization of capitalized curriculum costs
|
423 | 585 | ||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
1,263 | 493 | ||||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
381 | 135 | ||||||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Increase in accounts receivable, net
|
(5,195 | ) | (1,302 | ) | ||||
|
Decrease in inventories
|
507 | 463 | ||||||
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
102 | (2,582 | ) | |||||
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(2,701 | ) | 1,325 | |||||
|
Increase in other long-term liabilities
|
- | 61 | ||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable/receivable
|
438 | 261 | ||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
|
(2,149 | ) | 1,623 | |||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(303 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||
|
Curriculum development costs
|
(1,001 | ) | (86 | ) | ||||
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
(1,304 | ) | (215 | ) | ||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Proceeds from line of credit borrowing
|
16,265 | 13,066 | ||||||
|
Payments on line of credit borrowing
|
(14,449 | ) | (14,853 | ) | ||||
|
Principal payments on financing obligation
|
(178 | ) | (157 | ) | ||||
|
Proceeds from sales of common stock from treasury
|
77 | 62 | ||||||
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
(4 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
1,711 | (1,892 | ) | |||||
|
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(38 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,780 | ) | (540 | ) | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
3,484 | 1,688 | ||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
$ | 1,704 | $ | 1,148 | ||||
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
|
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 703 | $ | 710 | ||||
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of cash received
|
288 | 168 | ||||||
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Acquisition of property and equipment through accounts payable
|
$ | 177 | $ | 99 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
FRANKLIN COVEY CO.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Franklin Covey Co. (hereafter referred to as us, we, our, or the Company) is a leading global provider of execution, leadership, and personal-effectiveness training. We operate globally with one common brand and set of offerings designed to enable us to provide clients around the world with the same high level of service. To achieve this level of service, we operate four regional sales offices in the United States; wholly owned subsidiaries in Australia, Japan, and the United Kingdom; and contract with licensee partners who deliver our curriculum and provide services in over 140 other countries and territories around the world. Our business-to-business service builds on our expertise in training, consulting, and technology that is designed to help our clients define great performance and engage their leaders and front-line employees to execute at the highest levels. We also help clients accelerate great performance through education in management skills, relationship skills, and individual effectiveness, and can provide personal-effectiveness literature and electronic educational solutions to our clients as needed. Our services and products are available through professional consulting services, training on-site at client locations by Franklin Covey consultants, training on-site at client locations by client employees who have been certified to deliver our content (facilitators), public workshops, and through a series of offerings delivered via the Internet. These offerings are described in further detail at
www.franklincovey.com
. We have some of the best-known offerings in the training industry, including a suite of individual-effectiveness and leadership-development training products based on the best-selling book,
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People
and its execution process,
The 4 Disciplines of Execution
.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations. The information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company utilizes a modified 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on August 31 of each year. Corresponding quarterly periods generally consist of 13-week periods that end on November 27, 2010, February 26, 2011, and May 28, 2011 during fiscal 2011. Under the modified 52/53-week fiscal year, the quarter ended November 27, 2010 had one less business day than the quarter ended November 28, 2009. Unless otherwise noted, references to fiscal years apply to the 12 months ended on August 31 of the specified year.
The results of operations for the quarter ended November 27, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the entire fiscal year ending August 31, 2011, or for any future periods.
5
During fiscal 2010, we sold the product sales component of our wholly owned subsidiary in Japan. We determined that the operating results of the Japan product sales component qualified for discontinued operations presentation and we have presented the operating results of this component as discontinued operations for the quarter ended November 28, 2009. The income recognized from discontinued operations was comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
Sales
|
$ | 1,975 | ||
|
Gross profit
|
894 | |||
|
Income before income taxes
|
475 | |||
|
Income tax provision
|
(343 | ) | ||
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
132 | |||
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out method, and were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
November 27,
2010
|
August 31,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Finished goods
|
$ | 3,876 | $ | 4,366 | ||||
|
Raw materials
|
97 | 104 | ||||||
| $ | 3,973 | $ | 4,470 | |||||
Line of Credit
We have a revolving line of credit facility, as amended, that provided $13.5 million of available borrowing capacity (the Line of Credit) as of November 27, 2010. The available credit was contractually reduced to $10.0 million at December 31, 2010 and we had $5.5 million outstanding on the Line of Credit on December 31, 2010. The Line of Credit facility expires on March 14, 2011, and we may draw on the credit facility, repay, and draw again, on a revolving basis, up to the maximum loan amount available so long as no event of default has occurred and is continuing. We may use the Line of Credit for general corporate purposes as well as for other transactions, unless specifically prohibited by the terms of the Line of Credit. The Line of Credit also contains customary representations and guarantees as well as provisions for repayment and liens.
In addition to customary non-financial terms and conditions, our Line of Credit facility requires us to be in compliance with specified financial covenants, including (i) a funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and rent expense (EBITDAR) ratio requirement of less than 3.00 to 1.00; (ii) a fixed charge coverage ratio requirement in excess of 1.5 to 1.0; (iii) a minimum net worth of at least $67.0 million; and (iv) a capital expenditure limitations of less than $8.0 million per year. We believe that we were in compliance with the terms and covenants of the line of credit agreement for the quarter ended November 27, 2010.
Liquidity
At November 27, 2010 our Line of Credit has a remaining maturity of less than one year and is therefore classified as a current obligation on our consolidated balance sheet. In order to obtain a more favorable interest rate on the Line of Credit facility, the facility requires an annual renewal. We are currently in negotiations with the lender on the Line of Credit and we believe that we will be successful in obtaining a new or extended Line of Credit from our lender prior to the expiration of
6
the current credit facility in March 2011 to ensure available liquidity in future periods. Additional potential sources of liquidity include factoring receivables, issuance of additional equity, or issuance of debt from public or private sources. However, no assurance can be provided that we will obtain a new or extended Line of Credit or obtain additional financing from other sources on terms that would be acceptable to us. If necessary, we will evaluate all of these options and select one or more of them depending on overall capital needs and the associated cost of capital. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining a renewal or extension of our Line of Credit, or additional financing, we believe that cash flows from operations combined with a number of initiatives we would implement in the months preceding the due date would create sufficient liquidity to pay down the required outstanding balance on the Line of Credit. These initiatives include deferral of capital purchases for externally developed curriculum and uncommitted capital expenditures; deferral of executive team compensation; deferral of certain related party contractual earnout payments; substantial reduction of associate salaries; reduction of operating expenses, including non-critical travel; and deferral of payments to other vendors in order to generate sufficient cash.
We utilize various share-based compensation plans as integral components of our overall compensation and associate retention strategy. The compensation cost of our share-based compensation plans was included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated income statements and no share-based compensation was capitalized during the quarter ended November 27, 2010. The total cost of our share-based compensation plans was as follows for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
Quarter Ended November 27, 2010
|
Quarter Ended November 28, 2009
|
|||||||
|
Stock options
|
$ | 112 | $ | - | ||||
|
Fully vested stock awards
|
104 | - | ||||||
|
Unvested share awards
|
102 | 124 | ||||||
|
Performance awards
|
50 | - | ||||||
|
Employee stock purchase plan
|
13 | 11 | ||||||
| $ | 381 | $ | 135 | |||||
The following is a description of recent developments in our share-based compensation plans.
Stock Options
We have an incentive stock option plan whereby options to purchase shares of our common stock are issued to key employees at an exercise price not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Information related to our stock option activity during the quarter ended November 27, 2010 is presented below:
|
Number of Stock Options
|
Weighted Avg. Exercise Price Per Share
|
|||||||
|
Outstanding at August 31, 2010
|
482,000 | $ | 10.86 | |||||
|
Granted
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Exercised
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Forfeited
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Outstanding at
November 27, 2010
|
482,000 | $ | 10.86 | |||||
|
Options vested and exercisable at November 27, 2010
|
57,000 | $ | 7.95 | |||||
7
Although we had previously intended to grant to our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) a stock option to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock, subsequent to filing our annual report on Form 10-K, we determined that we were not able to grant options for more than 250,000 shares in one year. Therefore, we regard the option grant in 2010 to be for 250,000 shares. The impact of this oversight was immaterial to the fiscal 2010 financial statements. The Organization and Compensation Committee (the Compensation Committee) intends to award an additional 250,000 shares to the CEO with equivalent vesting conditions during fiscal 2011.
Fully Vested Stock Award
During the quarter ended November 27, 2010, we awarded a fully vested share award of 2,000 shares of our common stock to all of our client partners or consultants who have sold or delivered over a specified amount in cumulative sales over their careers. At the date of the inception of the award program, 4 client partners and 3 consultants qualified for the award. The 14,000 shares awarded to these individuals were valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, which was $7.45 per share. Accordingly, we recorded $0.1 million of share based compensation expense for these awards during the quarter ended November 27, 2010.
Unvested Share Awards
We have a non-employee directors’ stock incentive plan (the Directors’ Plan) that is designed to provide our non-employee directors, who are ineligible to participate in our employee stock incentive plan, an opportunity to acquire an interest in the Company through the acquisition of shares of common stock. The Directors’ Plan provides an annual whole-share grant equal to $40,000 with one-year vesting terms. The grant date of these awards is generally the date of each Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. The 2011 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting is scheduled during the quarter ending February 26, 2011 and there were no changes to the number of unvested share awards outstanding at November 27, 2010 from those disclosed at August 31, 2010.
Performance Awards
During the quarter ended November 27, 2010, the Compensation Committee determined to cancel the 2010 long-term incentive plan (LTIP) for some of the participants since the amount of the awards would have been additive to their total targeted compensation and a new equity incentive award is being considered for these former participants. This action canceled 35,039 targeted shares and the cumulative adjustment to reverse previously recorded compensation expense totaled approximately $66,000. The targeted number of shares to be awarded under the terms of the fiscal 2010 LTIP is now 182,385 shares.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We have an employee stock purchase plan that offers qualified employees the opportunity to purchase shares of our common stock at a price equal to 85 percent of the average fair market value of our common stock on the last trading day of the calendar month in each fiscal quarter. During the quarter ended November 27, 2010, a total of 14,561 shares were issued to participants in the ESPP.
In order to determine our quarterly provision for income taxes, we use an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income and statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Certain discrete items are separately recognized in the quarter during which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rates from quarter to quarter.
8
Our effective tax rate for the quarter ended November 27, 2010 of approximately 71 percent was significantly higher than statutory combined rates primarily due to foreign withholding taxes for which we cannot utilize a foreign tax credit, the accrual of taxable interest income on the management stock loan program, and actual and deemed dividends from foreign subsidiaries for which we also cannot utilize foreign tax credits. We anticipate that these items will add approximately $2.3 million to our income tax provision during fiscal 2011. However, our cash paid for income taxes will remain significantly less than our income tax provision during the foreseeable future as we utilize domestic net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred income tax assets. During the quarter ended November 27, 2010, we paid $0.3 million of cash for income taxes.
Comprehensive income or loss is based on net income or net loss and includes charges and credits to equity accounts that are not the result of transactions with shareholders. Our comprehensive income was calculated as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
November 27,
2010
|
November 28,
2009
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 794 | $ | 248 | ||||
|
Other comprehensive income items, net of tax:
|
||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
52 | 699 | ||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
$ | 846 | $ | 947 | ||||
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net income or loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income or loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the assumed exercise of all dilutive securities using the treasury stock method or the “if converted” method, as appropriate. Due to modifications to our management stock loan program, we determined that the shares of management stock loan participants that were placed in the escrow account are participating securities because they continue to have equivalent common stock dividend rights. Accordingly, these management stock loan shares are included in our basic EPS calculation during periods of net income and excluded from the basic EPS calculation in periods of net loss. Our unvested share awards granted prior to fiscal 2010 also participate in common stock dividends on the same basis as outstanding shares of common stock. However, the impact of the unvested share awards was immaterial to our EPS calculations for the periods presented.
The following table presents the computation of our EPS for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share amounts):
9
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
November 27,
2010
|
November 28,
2009
|
|||||||
|
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
||||||||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | 794 | $ | 116 | ||||
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
- | 132 | ||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 794 | $ | 248 | ||||
|
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
||||||||
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
(1)
|
17,032 | 16,958 | ||||||
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||
|
Stock options and other share-based awards
|
83 | 92 | ||||||
|
Common stock warrants
(2)
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
17,115 | 17,050 | ||||||
|
EPS Calculations:
|
||||||||
|
Income from continuing operations per share:
|
||||||||
|
Basic and diluted
|
$ | .05 | $ | .00 | ||||
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax:
|
||||||||
|
Basic and diluted
|
- | .01 | ||||||
|
Net income per share:
|
||||||||
|
Basic and diluted
|
.05 | .01 | ||||||
|
|
(1)
|
Since we recognized net income for the quarters ended November 27, 2010 and November 28, 2009, basic weighted average shares for those periods include 3.4 million shares and 3.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock held by management stock loan participants that were placed in escrow.
|
|
|
(2)
|
For the quarters ended November 27, 2010 and November 28, 2009, the conversion of 6.2 million common stock warrants is not assumed because such conversion would be anti-dilutive.
|
At November 27, 2010 and November 28, 2009, we had approximately 0.5 million and 1.7 million stock options outstanding, which were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of our common shares for the respective periods. Although these shares were not included in our calculation of diluted EPS, these stock options and our common stock warrants may have a dilutive effect on our EPS calculation in future periods if the price of our common stock increases.
Our sales are primarily comprised of training and consulting sales and related products. Based on the consistent nature of our services and products and the types of customers for these services, we function as a single operating segment. However, to improve comparability with previous periods, operating information for our U.S./Canada, international, and corporate services operations is presented below. Our U.S./Canada operations are responsible for the sale and delivery of our training and consulting services in the United States and Canada. Our international sales group includes the financial results of our directly owned foreign offices and royalty revenues from licensees. Our corporate services information includes leasing income and certain corporate operating expenses.
10
The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the CEO, and the primary measurement tool used in business unit performance analysis is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), which is a non-GAAP measure and may not be calculated as similarly titled amounts calculated by other companies. For segment reporting purposes, our consolidated EBITDA can be calculated as our income or loss from operations excluding depreciation and amortization charges.
In the normal course of business, we may make structural and cost allocation revisions to our segment information to reflect new reporting responsibilities within the organization. There were no significant organizational or structural changes during the quarter ended November 27, 2010, and all prior period segment information has been revised to conform to the most recent classifications and organizational changes. We account for our segment information on the same basis as the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quarter Ended
November 27, 2010
|
Sales to External Customers
|
Gross Profit
|
EBITDA
|
Depreciation
|
Amortization
|
|||||||||||||||
|
U.S./Canada
|
$ | 28,170 | $ | 16,391 | $ | 3,071 | $ | 457 | $ | 926 | ||||||||||
|
International
|
10,661 | 8,510 | 4,340 | 72 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
38,831 | 24,901 | 7,411 | 529 | 929 | |||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
585 | 175 | (2,124 | ) | 381 | - | ||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated
|
$ | 39,416 | $ | 25,076 | $ | 5,287 | $ | 910 | $ | 929 | ||||||||||
|
Quarter Ended
November 28, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S./Canada
|
$ | 21,775 | $ | 13,010 | $ | 1,878 | $ | 458 | $ | 958 | ||||||||||
|
International
|
9,353 | 7,207 | 3,084 | 96 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
31,128 | 20,217 | 4,962 | 554 | 962 | |||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
798 | 403 | (1,617 | ) | 420 | - | ||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated
|
$ | 31,926 | $ | 20,620 | $ | 3,345 | $ | 974 | $ | 962 | ||||||||||
A reconciliation of our U.S./Canada and international EBITDA to consolidated income from continuing operations before taxes is provided below (in thousands):
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
November 27,
2010
|
November 28,
2009
|
|||||||
|
U.S./Canada and international EBITDA
|
$ | 7,411 | $ | 4,962 | ||||
|
Corporate expenses
|
(2,124 | ) | (1,617 | ) | ||||
|
Consolidated EBITDA
|
5,287 | 3,345 | ||||||
|
Depreciation
|
(910 | ) | (974 | ) | ||||
|
Amortization
|
(929 | ) | (962 | ) | ||||
|
Income from operations
|
3,448 | 1,409 | ||||||
|
Interest income
|
4 | 3 | ||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(711 | ) | (718 | ) | ||||
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes
|
$ | 2,741 | $ | 694 | ||||
11
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based upon management’s current expectations and are subject to various uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements are set forth below under the heading “Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.”
We suggest that the following discussion and analysis be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2010.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The first quarter of fiscal 2011 continued the favorable momentum that we experienced during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as continued increases in government services revenues combined with increased U.S/Canada direct offices sales and improved sales in Japan produced significantly improved operating results compared to the prior year. For the first quarter of fiscal 2011, which ended on November 27, 2010, our consolidated sales were $39.4 million, a $7.5 million (or 23 percent) improvement over the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Our income from operations improved to $3.4 million compared to $1.4 million in the prior year. Our income from continuing operations before income taxes also improved to $2.7 million compared to $0.7 million in fiscal 2010. Following the provision for income taxes (refer to discussion below), our net income was $0.8 million, or $.05 per diluted share, compared to $0.2 million, or $.01 per diluted share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Looking forward, the booking pace for future events continues to improve and our pipeline of booked days and awarded revenue is approximately $11.0 million higher than at the end of the quarter ended November 28, 2009. We believe that this trend will help to improve performance over the prior year.
The primary factors that influenced our operating results for the quarter ended November 27, 2010 were as follows:
|
·
|
Sales
–
Our consolidated sales increased $7.5 million to $39.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to $31.9 million in the comparable quarter of fiscal 2010. Sales increased primarily due to increased sales through our government services group, increased sales at most of our other U.S./Canada direct offices, and from improved sales at our direct office in Japan.
|
|
·
|
Gross Profit
– Our gross profit totaled $25.1 million compared to $20.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and increased primarily due to increased sales in fiscal 2011 compared to the prior year. Our consolidated gross margin, which is gross profit in terms of a percentage of sales, declined slightly to 63.6 percent of sales compared to 64.6 percent in fiscal 2010. The fluctuation in our gross margin was primarily due to a change in delivery method of training courses sold during the quarter and a change in the overall mix of training and consulting programs sold during the quarter.
|
|
·
|
Operating Expenses
– Our operating expenses increased by $2.4 million compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010, which was primarily due to a $2.5 million increase in
|
12
selling, general, and administrative expenses. Increased selling, general and administrative expenses were partially offset by decreased depreciation and amortization expense.
|
·
|
Income Taxes
– For the quarter ended November 27, 2010, we recognized a tax provision on continuing operations of $1.9 million compared to $0.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase was primarily due to increased pre-tax income compared to the prior year.
|
The following table sets forth sales data from continuing operations by category and by our primary delivery channels (in thousands):
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||
|
November 27,
2010
|
November 28,
2009
|
Percent Change
|
||||||||||
|
Sales by Category:
|
||||||||||||
|
Training and consulting services
|
$ | 37,555 | $ | 30,257 | 24 | |||||||
|
Products
|
1,276 | 871 | 46 | |||||||||
|
Leasing
|
585 | 798 | (27 | ) | ||||||||
| $ | 39,416 | $ | 31,926 | 23 | ||||||||
|
Sales by Channel:
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S./Canada direct
|
$ | 21,085 | $ | 14,540 | 45 | |||||||
|
International direct
|
7,499 | 6,463 | 16 | |||||||||
|
International licensees
|
3,193 | 2,891 | 10 | |||||||||
|
National account practices
|
4,425 | 4,748 | (7 | ) | ||||||||
|
Self-funded marketing
|
2,167 | 1,939 | 12 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
1,047 | 1,345 | (22 | ) | ||||||||
| $ | 39,416 | $ | 31,926 | 23 | ||||||||
Further details regarding these factors and their impact on our operating results and liquidity are provided throughout the following management’s discussion and analysis.
Quarter Ended November 27, 2010 Compared to the Quarter Ended November 28, 2009
Sales
We offer a variety of training courses, consulting services, and training related products that are focused on leadership, productivity, strategy execution, sales force performance, trust, and effective communications that are provided both domestically and internationally through our sales force or through international licensee partners. For the quarter ended November 27, 2010, our consolidated sales increased by $7.5 million compared to the same period of fiscal 2010. The following sales analysis for the quarter ended November 27, 2010 is based on activity through our primary delivery channels:
U.S./Canada Direct
– This channel includes our four regional field offices that serve our clients in the United States and Canada and our government services group. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we had improved sales performance in this channel primarily due to increased sales from our government services group and improved sales at three of our four regional offices compared to fiscal 2010. Sales through our government services group increased $5.7 million primarily due to governmental services contracts obtained during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. We recognized $6.1 million from these contracts during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, which was more than ten percent of our total consolidated sales during the quarter. Sales through our regional sales offices also increased, and were up by $0.9 million compared to fiscal 2010. However, due to ongoing budget approval issues at the U.S. federal level, our sales through the government services group may be adversely affected if a budget is not approved in a timely manner.
International Direct –
Our three directly owned international offices are located in Australia, Japan, and the United Kingdom. The increase in international direct sales was primarily due to improved sales in Japan, which increased $1.2 million (on a continuing operations basis) compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in sales was attributable to improved publishing sales, the favorable impact of translating sales to U.S. dollars, and improved training
13
sales. Sales also increased by $0.1 million at our office in Australia. These increases were partially offset by decreased sales in the United Kingdom.
International Licensees –
In countries or foreign locations where we do not have a directly owned office, our training and consulting services are delivered through independent licensees, which may translate and adapt our curriculum to local preferences and customs, if necessary. During the quarter ended November 27, 2010, the majority of our foreign licensees had increased sales compared to the prior year.
National Account Practices –
Our national account practices are comprised of programs that are not typically offered in our regional field offices and includes
Helping Clients Succeed
from the sales performance group,
The Leader In Me
curriculum designed for students from our education practice, and
Winning Customer Loyalty
from our customer loyalty practice. The decrease in national account practice sales was due to a $0.7 million decrease in sales performance revenues primarily from a significant contract that launched in the prior year and has continued through the quarter ended November 27, 2010, but at a reduced rate. Despite the slow start to fiscal 2011, we anticipate that the sales performance group will grow significiantly during fiscal 2011 compared to the prior year.
Self-Funded Marketing –
This group includes our public programs, book and audio sales, and speeches. The increase in sales was primarily due to increased speeches delivered, which was partially offset by a slight decrease in public program sales.
Other –
Our other sales are comprised primarily of leasing and shipping and handling revenues. The decrease in other sales was primarily due to reduced leasing revenues as certain lease contracts at our corporate headquarters expired in prior periods. We are actively seeking new tenants for available property and believe that we will be successful in attracting new tenants to occupy vacant space at our corporate campus.
Gross Profit
Gross profit consists of net sales less the cost of services provided or the cost of products sold. For the quarter ended November 27, 2010, our consolidated gross profit increased to $25.1 million compared to $20.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to increased sales as previously described. Our consolidated gross margin, which is gross profit stated in terms of a percentage of sales, decreased to 63.6 percent of sales compared to 64.6 percent in fiscal 2010. The slight decrease in gross margin was primarily due to an increase in onsite training days delivered and a decrease in facilitator (training days delivered by client personnel) training days. Training days delivered by client facilitators generally have higher margins than onsite programs because there are generally no presenter or consultant costs associated with these sales. In addition, we experienced a shift in our mix of sales to programs and arrangements that had decreased margins. However, these factors were partially offset by increased international royalty revenues.
Operating Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative
–
Our selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased $2.5 million compared to the prior year. However, as a percent of sales, SG&A expenses declined to 50.2 percent in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to 54.1 percent of sales in the prior year. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to 1) a $1.0 million increase in associate costs resulting from increased commissions on improved sales compared to the prior year; 2) a $0.8 million increase in conference costs for our annual sales and delivery conference, which was held on a greatly reduced scale in fiscal 2010; 3) a $0.2 million increase in associate costs resulting from the addition of new personnel; 4) a $0.2 million increase in share-based compensation costs; and 5) a $0.2 million increase in travel expenses.
14
Depreciation and Amortization
–
Depreciation expense decreased by $0.1 million compared to the same quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated. We currently expect depreciation expense to total approximately $3.6 million during fiscal 2011.
Amortization expense from definite-lived intangible assets decreased by approximately $33,000 compared to the prior year primarily due to decreasing amortization expense resulting from the acquisition of CoveyLink Worldwide, LLC in fiscal 2009. We expect that intangible asset amortization expense will total $3.5 million in fiscal 2011.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 of approximately 71 percent was higher than statutory combined rates primarily due to foreign withholding taxes for which we cannot utilize a foreign tax credit, the accrual of taxable interest income on the management stock loan program, and actual and deemed dividends from foreign subsidiaries for which we also cannot utilize foreign tax credits. These items are expected to add approximately $2.3 million to our income tax expense during fiscal 2011.
However, our cash paid for income taxes will remain significantly less than our income tax provision during the foreseeable future as we utilize domestic net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred income tax assets. After our domestic net operating loss carryforwards are utilized, we will be able to utilize our foreign tax credits, which will reduce our income tax liability in future periods. After utilization of these deferred tax assets, we expect to report a more normalized income tax rate.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At November 27, 2010 we had $1.7 million of cash and cash equivalents compared to $3.5 million at August 31, 2010 and our net working capital (current assets less current liabilities) totaled $7.9 million at November 27, 2010 compared to $4.6 million at August 31, 2010. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, our cash balance decreased primarily due to the repatriation of the remaining proceeds from the sale of our Japan products division from Japan to the United States and the utilization of those proceeds to repay our Line of Credit and fund working capital requirements.
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from the sale of services and products in the normal course of business and proceeds from our revolving Line of Credit facility. We may use the Line of Credit facility for general corporate purposes as well as for other transactions, unless prohibited by the terms of the Line of Credit agreement. The Line of Credit also contains customary representations and guarantees as well as provisions for repayment and liens. Our Line of Credit agreement expires in March 2011 and is therefore classified as a current obligation on our condensed consolidated balance sheet at November 27, 2010. We are currently in negotiations with our lender to renew the Line of Credit as described below in “Sources of Liquidity.” At November 27, 2010, we had $11.3 million outstanding on the Line of Credit and the available funding was contractually reduced to $10.0 million on December 31, 2010. We had $5.5 million outstanding on the Line of Credit on December 31, 2010.
In addition to customary non-financial terms and conditions, our line of credit requires us to be in compliance with specified financial covenants, including (i) a funded debt to EBITDAR ratio requirement of less than 3.00 to 1.00; (ii) a fixed charge coverage ratio requirement in excess of 1.5 to 1.0; (iii) a minimum net worth of at least $67.0 million; and (iv) a capital expenditure limitations of less than $8.0 million per year. We believe that we were in compliance with the terms and covenants of the line of credit agreement for the quarter ended November 27, 2010.
In addition to our $13.5 million Line of Credit facility, we have a long-term lease on our corporate campus that is accounted for as a long-term financing obligation.
15
The following discussion is a description of the primary factors affecting our cash flows and their effects upon our liquidity and capital resources during the quarter ended November 27, 2010.
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Our primary source of cash from operating activities was the sale of goods and services to our customers in the normal course of business. The primary uses of cash for operating activities were payments for selling, general, and administrative expenses, payments for direct costs necessary to conduct training programs, payments to suppliers for materials used in products sold, and to fund working capital needs. Our cash used for operating activities totaled $2.1 million for the quarter ended November 27, 2010 compared to $1.6 million provided by operating activities during the quarter ended November 28, 2009. The decrease in cash flows from operating activities was primarily driven by changes in working capital compared to the prior year and was partially offset by improved income from operations. As previously mentioned, we have recognized significant sales through our government services channel during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 and the first quarter of fiscal 2011. As of November 27, 2010, we had not yet received payment for a significant amount of these sales and our accounts receivable were significantly higher than at year end. However, subsequent to November 27, 2010 we have received $9.8 million in payments on these sales and expect an improvement in the collection cycle for these receivables during fiscal 2011. We also used cash to pay our seasonally high August 31 accrued liabilities, which primarily consisted of year end commissions and bonuses. We believe that our continued efforts to improve working capital balances and improve income from operations will improve our cash flows from operating activities in future periods of fiscal 2011. However, the success of these efforts, and their eventual contribution to our cash flows, is dependent upon numerous factors, many of which are not within our control.
Cash Flows From Investing Activities and Capital Expenditures
During the quarter ended November 27, 2010, we used $1.3 million of cash for investing activities. Our primary uses of cash for investing activities were additional spending on curriculum development and the purchase of property and equipment in the normal course of business. We spent $1.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 primarily to develop new productivity and leadership offerings. Our purchases of property and equipment, which totaled $0.3 million, consisted primarily of computer hardware and software items.
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 our net cash provided by financing activities totaled $1.7 million, which consisted primarily of proceeds from our line of credit facility to finance working capital needs as described above. Partially offsetting the cash obtained from our line of credit was $0.2 million of cash used for principal payments on our financing obligation.
Sources of Liquidity
Going forward, we will continue to incur costs necessary for the operation and potential growth of the business. We anticipate using cash on hand, cash provided by the sale of goods and services to our clients on the condition that we can continue to generate positive cash flows from operating activities, proceeds from our line of credit, and other financing alternatives, if necessary, for these expenditures. We are currently in negotiations with the lender on our line of credit and we believe that we will be successful in obtaining a new or extended line of credit from our lender prior to the expiration of the current credit facility in March 2011 to ensure available liquidity in future periods. Additional potential sources of liquidity include factoring receivables, issuance of additional equity, or issuance of debt from public or private sources. However, no assurance can be provided that we will obtain a new or extended line of credit or obtain additional financing from other sources on terms that would be acceptable to us. If necessary, we will evaluate all of these options
16
and select one or more of them depending on overall capital needs and the associated cost of capital. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining a renewal or extension of our Line of Credit, or additional financing, we believe that cash flows from operations combined with a number of initiatives we would implement in the months preceding the due date would create sufficient liquidity to pay down the required outstanding balance on the line of credit. These initiatives include deferral of capital purchases for externally developed curriculum and uncommitted capital expenditures; deferral of executive team compensation; deferral of certain related party contractual earnout payments; substantial reduction of associate salaries; reduction of operating expenses, including non-critical travel; and deferral of payments to other vendors in order to generate sufficient cash.
Considering the foregoing, we anticipate that our existing capital resources should be adequate to enable us to maintain our operations for at least the upcoming twelve months. However, our ability to maintain adequate capital for our operations in the future is dependent upon a number of factors, including sales trends, our ability to contain costs, levels of capital expenditures, collection of accounts receivable, and other factors. Some of the factors that influence our operations are not within our control, such as economic conditions and the introduction of new technology and products by our competitors. We will continue to monitor our liquidity position and may pursue additional financing alternatives, as described above, to maintain sufficient resources for future growth and capital requirements. However, there can be no assurance such financing alternatives will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
Contractual Obligations
The Company has not structured any special purpose or variable interest entities, or participated in any commodity trading activities, which would expose us to potential undisclosed liabilities or create adverse consequences to our liquidity. Required contractual payments primarily consist of 1) lease payments resulting from the sale of our corporate campus (financing obligation); 2) payments to HP Enterprise Services for outsourcing services related to information systems, warehousing, and distribution services; 3) minimum rent payments for office and warehouse space; 4) the repayment of our Line of Credit obligation; and 5) short-term purchase obligations for inventory items and other products and services used in the ordinary course of business. There have been no significant changes to our expected required contractual obligations from those disclosed at August 31, 2010.
According to the terms of the agreements associated with the sale of the Consumer Solutions Business Unit assets that closed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we assigned the benefits and obligations relating to the leases of our retail stores to Franklin Covey Products, LLC (Franklin Covey Products), an entity in which we own approximately 19 percent. However, we remain secondarily liable for these leases and may have to fulfill the obligations contained in the lease agreements, including making lease payments, if Franklin Covey Products is unable to fulfill its obligations pursuant to the terms of the lease agreements. Any default by Franklin Covey Products in its lease payment obligations could provide us with certain remedies against Franklin Covey Products, including potentially allowing us to terminate the Master License Agreement. If Franklin Covey Products is unable to satisfy the obligations contained in the lease agreements and we are unable to obtain adequate remedies, our results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.
Other Items
The Company is the creditor for a loan program that provided the capital to allow certain management personnel the opportunity to purchase shares of our common stock. For further information regarding our management common stock loan program, refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010. The inability of the Company to collect all, or a portion, of these receivables could have an adverse impact upon our financial position and future cash flows compared to full collection of the loans.
17
USE OF ESTIMATES AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The significant accounting polices used to prepare our consolidated financial statements are outlined primarily in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements presented in Part II, Item 8 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010. Some of those accounting policies require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions and base those estimates and assumptions on historical experience, factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, including changes in economic conditions and other circumstances that are not within our control, but which may have an impact on these estimates and our actual financial results.
The following items require significant judgment and often involve complex estimates:
Revenue Recognition
We derive revenues primarily from the following sources:
|
·
|
Training and Consulting Services
– We provide training and consulting services to both organizations and individuals in leadership, productivity, strategic execution, goal alignment, sales force performance, and communication effectiveness skills.
|
|
·
|
Products
– We sell books, audio media, training accessories, and other related products.
|
We recognize revenue when: 1) persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, 2) delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered, 3) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and 4) collectability is reasonably assured. For training and service sales, these conditions are generally met upon presentation of the training seminar or delivery of the consulting services. For product sales, these conditions were generally met upon shipment of the product to the customer or by completion of the sales transaction in a retail store.
Some of our training and consulting contracts contain multiple deliverable elements that include training along with other products and services. For transactions that contain more than one element, we recognize revenue in accordance with the guidance for multiple element arrangements. On September 1, 2010, we adopted the provisions of EITF 08-1,
Revenue Recognition – Multiple Element Arrangements
(FASC 650-25). This consensus amends existing guidance on multiple element revenue arrangements to improve the ability of entities to recognize revenue from the sale of delivered items that are part of a multiple-element arrangement when other items have not yet been delivered. One of the previous requirements was that there must be objective and reliable evidence of the standalone selling price of the undelivered items, which must be supported by vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) or third-party evidence (TPE). The provisions of EITF 08-1 eliminate the requirements that all undelivered elements have VSOE or TPE before an entity can recognize the portion of an overall arrangement that is attributable to items that have already been delivered. The “residual method” of allocating revenue is thereby eliminated, and entities are required to allocate the arrangement consideration at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. The adoption of EITF 08-1 did not have a material impact on our financial statements during the quarter ended November 27, 2010.
Our international strategy includes the use of licensees in countries where we do not have a wholly-owned operation. Licensee companies are unrelated entities that have been granted a license to translate our content and curriculum, adapt the content and curriculum to the local culture, and sell our training seminars and products in a specific country or region. Licensees are required to pay us royalties based upon a percentage of their sales to clients. We recognize royalty income each
18
period based upon the sales information reported to us from our licensees. Royalty revenue is reported as a component of training and consulting service sales in our consolidated statements of operations.
Revenue is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated amounts for discounts and product returns.
Share-Based Compensation
Our shareholders have approved a performance based long-term incentive plan (the LTIP) that provides for annual grants of share-based performance awards to certain managerial personnel and executive management as directed by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The number of common shares that are vested and issued to LTIP participants is variable and is based entirely upon the achievement of specified financial performance objectives during a defined performance period. Due to the variable number of common shares that may be issued under the LTIP, we reevaluate our LTIP grants on a quarterly basis and adjust the number of shares expected to be awarded based upon actual and estimated financial results of the Company compared to the performance goals set for the award. Adjustments to the number of shares awarded, and to the corresponding compensation expense, are made on a cumulative basis at the adjustment date based upon the estimated probable number of common shares to be awarded.
The analysis of our LTIP awards contain uncertainties because we are required to make assumptions and judgments about the eventual number of shares that will vest in each LTIP grant. The assumptions and judgments that are essential to the analysis include forecasted sales and operating income levels during the LTIP service periods. The evaluation of LTIP performance awards and the corresponding use of estimated amounts may produce additional volatility in our consolidated financial statements as we record cumulative adjustments to the estimated number of common shares to be awarded under the LTIP grants as described above.
During fiscal 2010 we also granted options to purchase shares of our common stock that have a share price, or market based, vesting condition. As a result, we used a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value of these stock options. The Monte Carlo option pricing model required the input of subjective assumptions, including items such as the expected term of the options. If factors change and we use different assumptions for estimating share-based compensation expense related to stock options, our share-based compensation expense may differ materially from that recorded in the current period.
Accounts Receivable Valuation
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the existing accounts receivable balance. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon historical write-off experience and current economic conditions and we review the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular basis. Receivable balances over 90 days past due, which exceed a specified dollar amount, are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the probability for recovery is considered remote. We do not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to our customers.
Our allowance for doubtful accounts calculations contain uncertainties because the calculations require us to make assumptions and judgments regarding the collectability of customer accounts, which may be influenced by a number of factors that are not within our control, such as the financial health of each customer. We regularly review the collectability assumptions of our allowance for doubtful accounts calculation and compare them against historical collections. Adjustments to the assumptions may either increase or decrease our total allowance for doubtful accounts. For example, a 10 percent increase to our allowance for doubtful accounts at November 27, 2010 would decrease our reported income from operations by approximately $0.1 million.
19
Inventory Valuation
Our inventories are primarily comprised of training materials and related accessories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventories are reduced to their fair market value through the use of inventory loss reserves, which are recorded during the normal course of business.
Our inventory loss reserve calculations contain uncertainties because the calculations require us to make assumptions and judgments regarding a number of factors, including future inventory demand requirements and pricing strategies. During the evaluation process we consider historical sales patterns and current sales trends, but these may not be indicative of future inventory losses. While we have not made material changes to our inventory valuation methodology during the past three years, our inventory requirements may change based on projected customer demand, technological and product life cycle changes, longer or shorter than expected usage periods, and other factors that could affect the valuation of our inventories. If our estimates regarding consumer demand and other factors are inaccurate, we may be exposed to losses that may have a materially adverse impact upon our financial position and results of operations. For example, a 10 percent increase to our inventory reserves at November 27, 2010 would decrease our reported income from operations by $0.1 million.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We use an estimate of undiscounted future net cash flows of the assets over their remaining useful lives in determining whether the carrying value of the assets is recoverable. If the carrying values of the assets exceed the anticipated future cash flows of the assets, we calculate an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated fair value, which may be based upon discounted cash flows over the estimated remaining useful life of the asset. If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new cost basis, which is then depreciated or amortized over the remaining useful life of the asset. Impairment of long-lived assets is assessed at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are independent from other groups of assets.
Our impairment evaluation calculations contain uncertainties because they require us to make assumptions and apply judgment in order to estimate future cash flows, forecast the useful lives of the assets, and select a discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows. Although we have not made any material recent changes to our long-lived assets impairment assessment methodology, if forecasts and assumptions used to support the carrying value of our long-lived tangible and definite-lived intangible assets change in the future, significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible assets that are deemed to have an indefinite life and goodwill balances are not amortized, but rather are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. The Covey trade name intangible asset was generated by the merger with the Covey Leadership Center and has been deemed to have an indefinite life. This intangible asset is tested for impairment using the present value of estimated royalties on trade name related revenues, which consist primarily of training seminars and international licensee royalties. Our goodwill at November 27, 2010 was generated by the acquisition of CoveyLink Worldwide, LLC during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and the subsequent payment of the first of five potential earnout payments contained in the acquisition agreement.
20
Our impairment evaluation calculations for goodwill and the Covey trade name contain uncertainties because they require us to make assumptions and apply judgment in order to estimate future cash flows, to estimate an appropriate royalty rate, and to select a discount rate that reflects the inherent risk of future cash flows. Our valuation methodology for the Covey trade name has remained unchanged during the past three years. However, if forecasts and assumptions used to support the carrying value of our indefinite-lived intangible asset change in future periods, significant impairment charges could result that would have an adverse effect upon our results of operations and financial condition. The valuation methodologies for both indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill are also dependent upon the share price of our common stock and corresponding market capitalization, which may differ from estimated royalties used in our annual impairment testing. Based upon the fiscal 2010 evaluation of the Covey trade name and goodwill, our trade-name related revenues, licensee royalties, and overall sales levels would have to suffer significant reductions before we would be required to impair them. However, future declines in our share price may trigger additional impairment testing and may result in impairment charges.
Income Taxes
We regularly evaluate our United States federal and various state and foreign jurisdiction income tax exposures. We account for certain aspects of our income tax provision using the provisions of FASC 740-10-05 (formerly FIN 48), which addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. We may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon final settlement. The provisions of FASC 740-10-05 also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest, and penalties on income taxes, accounting for income taxes in interim periods, and require increased disclosure of various income tax items. Taxes and penalties are components of our overall income tax provision.
We record previously unrecognized tax benefits in the financial statements when it becomes more likely than not (greater than a 50 percent likelihood) that the tax position will be sustained. To assess the probability of sustaining a tax position, we consider all available evidence. In many instances, sufficient positive evidence may not be available until the expiration of the statute of limitations for audits by taxing jurisdictions, at which time the entire benefit will be recognized as a discrete item in the applicable period.
Our unrecognized tax benefits result from uncertain tax positions about which we are required to make assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions. The calculation of our income tax provision or benefit, as applicable, requires estimates of future taxable income or losses. During the course of the fiscal year, these estimates are compared to actual financial results and adjustments may be made to our tax provision or benefit to reflect these revised estimates. Our effective income tax rate is also affected by changes in tax law and the results of tax audits by various jurisdictions. Although we believe that our judgments and estimates discussed herein are reasonable, actual results could differ, and we could be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.
We establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when we estimate it is more likely than not that the tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether valuation allowances are needed on our deferred income tax assets contains uncertainties because we must project future income, including the use of tax-planning strategies, by individual tax jurisdictions. Changes in industry and economic conditions and the competitive environment may impact the accuracy of our projections. We regularly assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be realized and determine if adjustments to our valuation allowance are necessary.
21
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
Certain written and oral statements made by the Company in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or achievements, and may contain words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” or words or phrases of similar meaning. In our reports and filings we may make forward looking statements regarding our expectations about future sales levels, future training and consulting sales activity, anticipated expenses, the adequacy of existing capital resources, the ability of the Company to obtain a renewal or extension of its line of credit agreement, projected cost reduction and strategic initiatives, our expectations about the effect of the sale of the CSBU on our business, expected levels of depreciation and amortization expense, expectations regarding tangible and intangible asset valuation expenses, the seasonality of future sales, the seasonal fluctuations in cash used for and provided by operating activities, expected improvements in cash flows from operating activities, expected improvements in our collection cycle for receivables, future compliance with the terms and conditions of our line of credit, the ability to borrow on our Line of Credit, expected repayment of our line of credit in future periods, estimated capital expenditures, the impact of the Federal budgeting process, and cash flow estimates used to determine the fair value of long-lived assets. These, and other forward-looking statements, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are disclosed from time to time in reports filed by us with the SEC, including reports on Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and 10-K. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the matters discussed in Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010, entitled “Risk Factors.” In addition, such risks and uncertainties may include unanticipated developments in any one or more of the following areas: unanticipated costs or capital expenditures; difficulties encountered by HP Enterprise Services in operating and maintaining our information systems and controls, including without limitation, the systems related to demand and supply planning, inventory control, and order fulfillment; delays or unanticipated outcomes relating to our strategic plans; dependence on existing products or services; the rate and consumer acceptance of new product introductions; competition; the number and nature of customers and their product orders, including changes in the timing or mix of product or training orders; pricing of our products and services and those of competitors; adverse publicity; and other factors which may adversely affect our business.
The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors may emerge and it is not possible for our management to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any single factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.
The market price of our common stock has been and may remain volatile. In addition, the stock markets in general have experienced increased volatility. Factors such as quarter-to-quarter variations in revenues and earnings or losses and our failure to meet expectations could have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock. In addition, the price of our common stock can change for reasons unrelated to our performance. Due to our low market capitalization, the price of our common stock may also be affected by conditions such as a lack of analyst coverage and fewer potential investors.
Forward-looking statements are based on management’s expectations as of the date made, and the Company does not undertake any responsibility to update any of these statements in the future except as required by law. Actual future performance and results will differ and may differ
22
materially from that contained in or suggested by forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in our filings with the SEC.
There have been no material changes from the information previously reported under Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010. During the quarter ended November 27, 2010, we did not utilize any foreign currency or interest rate derivative instruments.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f)) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
23
For further information regarding our Risk Factors, please refer to Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010.
The Company acquired the following securities during the fiscal quarter ended November 27, 2010:
|
Period
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
Weighted
Average Price Paid Per Share
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
|
Maximum Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
|
|||||||||
|
Common Shares:
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
September 1, 2010 to October 2, 2010
|
- | $ | - |
none
|
$ | 2,413 | |||||||
|
October 3, 2010 to October 30, 2010
(2)
|
500 | 7.95 |
none
|
2,413 | |||||||||
|
October 31, 2010 to November 27, 2010
|
- | - |
none
|
2,413 | (1) | ||||||||
|
Total Common Shares
|
500 | $ | 7.95 |
none
|
|||||||||
|
|
(1)
|
In January 2006, our Board of Directors approved the purchase of up to $10.0 million of our outstanding common stock. All previous authorized common stock purchase plans were canceled. Pursuant to the terms of this stock purchase plan, we have acquired 1,009,300 shares of our common stock for $7.6 million through November 27, 2010.
|
|
|
(2)
|
These shares were acquired from a former employee who approached us regarding a purchase transaction. The shares were valued using the closing share price of our common stock on the date of the transaction.
|
|
(A)
|
Exhibits:
|
|
|
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
32
|
Section 1350 Certifications.
|
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
FRANKLIN COVEY CO.
|
||||
|
Date:
|
January 6, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert A. Whitman
|
|
|
Robert A. Whitman
|
||||
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
||||
|
Date:
|
January 6, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Stephen D. Young
|
|
|
Stephen D. Young
|
||||
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I. Financial InformationItem 1. Financial StatementsNote 1 Basis Of PresentationNote 2 InventoriesNote 3 Commitments and ContingenciesNote 4 Share-based CompensationNote 5 Income TaxesNote 6 Comprehensive IncomeNote 7 Earnings Per ShareNote 8 Segment InformationItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 4. Controls and ProceduresPart II. Other InformationItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsItem 6. Exhibits