FFWM 10-Q Quarterly Report Sept. 30, 2016

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

10-Ks and 10-Qs

10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013

PROXIES

DEF 14A	Filed on May 29, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on April 17, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on Sept. 30, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on Aug. 22, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on May 28, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on April 18, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on June 7, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on April 29, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on April 23, 2021
DEF 14A	Filed on April 24, 2020
DEF 14A	Filed on April 26, 2019
DEF 14A	Filed on July 26, 2018
DEF 14A	Filed on July 26, 2017
DEF 14A	Filed on July 21, 2016
DEF 14A	Filed on Sept. 25, 2015
DEF 14A	Filed on July 1, 2014

10-Q 1 ffwm-10q_20160930.htm FFWM-Q3-20160930 ffwm-10q_20160930.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-36461

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		20-8639702
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700 Irvine, CA 92612		92612
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(949) 202-4160

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:


Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒

Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of November 7th, 2016, there were 16,327,658 shares of registrant’s common stock outstanding

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Exhibit No.

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	41

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	41

Part II. Other Information

Item 1A	Risk Factors	41

Item 6	Exhibits	42

SIGNATURES		S-1

EXHIBITS		E-1

(i)

P ART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

I TEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
		(unaudited)
ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents	$	496,813		$	215,748
Securities available-for-sale (“AFS”)		542,703			565,135
Loans held for sale		200,002			—
Loans, net of deferred fees		2,308,829			1,765,483
Allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”)		(13,600	)		(10,600	)
Net loans		2,295,229			1,754,883

Investment in FHLB stock		25,677			21,492
Premises and equipment, net		5,342			2,653
Deferred taxes		10,156			15,392
Real estate owned (“REO”)		544			4,036
Goodwill and intangibles		2,232			2,416
Other assets		14,970			10,824
Total Assets	$	3,593,668		$	2,592,579

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Liabilities:
Deposits	$	2,338,737		$	1,522,176
Borrowings		951,000			796,000
Accounts payable and other liabilities		16,637			14,667
Total Liabilities		3,306,374			2,332,843

Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock, par value $0.001: 70,000,000 shares authorized; 16,300,833 and 15,980,526 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		16			16
Additional paid-in-capital		231,631			227,262
Retained earnings		50,548			33,762
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		5,099			(1,304	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		287,294			259,736

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	3,593,668		$	2,592,579

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	Quarter Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015			2016			2015
Interest income:
Loans	$	22,231	$	15,634		$	61,362		$	41,097
Securities AFS		3,202		1,107			9,423			2,744
Fed funds sold, FHLB stock and deposits		571		367			1,490			1,418
Total interest income		26,004		17,108			72,275			45,259

Interest expense:
Deposits		2,426		1,328			6,194			3,366
Borrowings		415		319			1,636			1,137
Total interest expense		2,841		1,647			7,830			4,503

Net interest income		23,163		15,461			64,445			40,756

Provision for loan losses		1,231		570			2,881			1,473

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		21,932		14,891			61,564			39,283

Noninterest income:
Asset management, consulting and other fees		6,141		5,870			18,127			17,642
Gain on sale of loans		7,238		205			7,238			205
Gain (loss) on capital markets activities		993		(2	)		(1,055	)		(28	)
Other income		707		795			2,664			1,673
Total noninterest income		15,079		6,868			26,974			19,492

Noninterest expense:
Compensation and benefits		12,059		10,870			36,707			29,440
Occupancy and depreciation		3,072		2,561			8,783			6,486
Professional services and marketing costs		3,525		1,481			7,808			4,051
Other expenses		2,880		2,044			7,505			4,311
Total noninterest expense		21,536		16,956			60,803			44,288

Income before taxes on income		15,475		4,803			27,735			14,487
Taxes on income		5,800		2,041			10,949			6,157
Net income	$	9,675	$	2,762		$	16,786		$	8,330


Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.60	$	0.22		$	1.04		$	0.87
Diluted	$	0.58	$	0.21		$	1.01		$	0.84
Shares used to compute net income per share:
Basic		16,257,008		12,623,924			16,132,112			9,534,056
Diluted		16,787,947		13,074,935			16,682,807			9,929,445

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES

IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY - Unaudited

(In thousands, except share amounts)


	Common Stock							Accumulated Other
	Number of Shares	Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings		Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balance: December 31, 2015	15,980,526	$	16	$	227,262	$	33,762	$	(1,304	)	$	259,736
Net income	—		—		—		16,786		—			16,786
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—		—		6,403			6,403
Stock based compensation	—		—		712		—		—			712
Issuance of common stock:
Exercise of options	293,471		—		3,657		—		—			3,657
Issuance of restricted stock	26,836		—		—		—		—			—
Balance: September 30, 2016	16,300,833	$	16	$	231,631	$	50,548	$	5,099		$	287,294

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME - UNAUDITED

(In thousands)

	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015

Net income	$	9,675		$	2,762		$	16,786		$	8,330
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized holding gains (loss) on securities arising during the period		(1,033	)		2,690			9,805			1,477
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax		(1,033	)		2,690			9,805			1,477
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income		425			(1,107	)		(4,035	)		(607	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(608	)		1,583			5,770			870

Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains (loss) included in net earnings		(993	)		(2	)		1,055			(28	)
Income tax (expense) benefit related to reclassification adjustment		397			1			(422	)		12
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net earnings, net of tax		(596	)		(1	)		633			(16	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(1,204	)		1,582			6,403			854
Total comprehensive income	$	8,471		$	4,344		$	23,189		$	9,184

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED

(In thousands)

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$	16,786		$	8,330
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		2,881			1,473
Stock–based compensation expense		712			383
Depreciation and amortization		1,338			995
Deferred tax provision		758			(1,068	)
Accretion of discounts on purchased loans, net		(755	)		(523	)
Gain on sale of loans		(7,238	)		(205	)
Gain on sale of capital market activities		(1,307	)		—
Increase in other assets		(1,429	)		(2,076	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities		1,970			(14	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		13,716			7,295

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net increase in loans		(1,008,136	)		(402,543	)
Proceeds from sale of REO		4,442			2,205
Proceeds from sale of loans		270,005			—
Purchases of premises and equipment		(4,027	)		(1,142	)
Purchases of securities AFS		(130,829	)		(225,396	)
Proceeds from sale of securities AFS		104,146			—
Maturities / payments – securities AFS		60,715			11,648
Cash acquired in acquisition		—			38,081
Purchases (net of redemptions) of FHLB stock		(4,185	)		(5,307	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(707,869	)		(582,454	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Increase in deposits		816,561			238,732
FHLB Advances – net increase		155,000			397,000
Proceeds – term note		—			10,114
Principal payments – term note		—			(30,000	)
Proceeds from sale of stock, net		3,657			135,959
Net cash provided by financing activities		975,218			751,805

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		281,065			176,646
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		215,748			29,692
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	496,813		$	206,338

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	7,334		$	4,444
Income taxes	$	10,050		$	7,650
Noncash transactions:
Recoveries (net of chargeoffs) added to allowance for loans losses	$	119		$	323
Transfer of loans to REO	$	950		$	—
Transfer of loans to loans held for sale	$	468,743		$	113,325
Mortgage servicing rights created from sale of loans	$	1,945		$	—

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 - UNAUDITED

NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements include First Foundation Inc. (“FFI”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries: First Foundation Advisors (“FFA”), First Foundation Bank (“FFB” or the “Bank”) and First Foundation Insurance Services (“FFIS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of FFB (collectively referred to as the “Company”). All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations reflect any interim adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature and which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period presented. The results for the 2016 interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices within the banking industry. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all information and footnotes required for interim financial statement presentation. Those financial statements assume that readers of this Report have read the most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K which contains the latest available audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2016 presentation.

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“ FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvement to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting . The new standard contains several amendments that will simplify the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, statutory tax withholding requirements, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The changes in the new standard eliminate the accounting for excess tax benefits to be recognized in additional paid-in capital and tax deficiencies recognized either in the income tax provision or in additional paid-in capital. The Company elected early adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the third quarter of 2016 which was applied using a modified retrospective approach. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recognized all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies that occurred in 2016 as income tax expense or benefit as a discrete event. An income tax benefit of approximately $0.8 million was recognized for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09. There was no change to retained earnings with respect to excess tax benefits, as this is not applicable to the Company. In addition there was no cumulative effect on retained earnings as a result of the election by the Company to adopt an accounting policy to account for forfeitures as they occur. With the early adoption of 2016-09, we have elected to present the cash flow statement on a prospective transition method and no prior periods have been adjusted. ASU 2016-09 requires the recognition of any tax benefits or deficiencies to be recognized in the period in which they occur. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09, our effective tax rate for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was decreased by 4.5% and 2.5%, respectively.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15 “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” which provides guidance for eight specific cash flow issues. FASB issued the standard to clarify areas where GAAP has been either unclear or lacking in specific guidance. This update is effective for the Company for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-15 on its financial statements and disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” which introduces new guidance for the accounting for credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. It also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination. The new model, referred to as the current expected credit losses (CECL) model, will apply to financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. Upon initial recognition of the exposure, the CECL model requires an entity to estimate the credit losses expected over the life of an exposure. This update is effective for the Company for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-13 on its financial statements and disclosures.

On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . The most significant change for lessees is the requirement under the new guidance to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all leases not considered short-term leases,

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

which is generally defined as a lease term of less than 12 months. This change will result in lessees recognizing right-of-use assets a nd lease liabilities for most leases currently accounted for as operating leases under current lease accounting guidance. The amendments in this u pdate are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is current ly evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-02 on its financial statements and disclosures.

On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments–Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10) . Changes made to the current measurement model primarily affect the accounting for equity securities with readily determinable fair values, where changes in fair value will impact earnings instead of other comprehensive income. The accounting for other financial instruments, such as loans, investments in debt securities, and financial liabilities is largely unchanged. The update also changes the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments including a requirement that public business entities use exit price when measuring the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for disclosure purposes. This update is generally effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-01 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments . The amendments in this update require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. For public companies, this update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal periods. The adoption of ASU No. 2015-16 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE 2: ACQUISITIONS

On June 16, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of Pacific Rim Bank (“PRB”), through a merger of PRB with and into the Bank, in exchange for 621,345 shares of its common stock with a fair value of $19.00 per share and $543,000 in cash, which was paid to dissenting shareholders. The primary reason for acquiring PRB was to expand our operations into Hawaii.

The acquisition is accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The acquired assets, assumed liabilities and identifiable intangible assets are recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values. Goodwill of $1.3 million, which is not tax deductible, is included in intangible assets in the table below.

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

The following table represents the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of PRB as of June 16, 201 5 and the fair value adjustments and amounts recorded by the Bank in 201 5 under the acquisition method of accounting:


	PRB Book Value			Fair Value Adjustments			Fair Value
(dollars in thousands)
Assets Acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	38,624		$	—		$	38,624
Securities AFS		7,179			115			7,294
Loans, net of deferred fees		80,192			(2,419	)		77,773
Allowance for loan losses		(2,034	)		2,034			—
Premises and equipment, net		251			(188	)		63
Investment in FHLB stock		152			—			152
Deferred taxes		—			2,258			2,258
REO		4,374			(672	)		3,702
Goodwill		—			1,300			1,300
Core deposit intangible		—			1,099			1,099
Other assets		269			—			269
Total assets acquired	$	129,007		$	3,527		$	132,534

Liabilities Assumed:
Deposits	$	119,663		$	178		$	119,841
Accounts payable and other liabilities		442			(98	)		344
Total liabilities assumed		120,105			80			120,185
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed		8,902			3,447			12,349
Total	$	129,007		$	3,527		$	132,534

Consideration:
Stock issued							$	11,806
Cash paid								543
Total							$	12,349

In many cases, the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined by estimating the cash flows expected to result from those assets and liabilities and discounting them at appropriate market rates. The most significant category of assets for which this procedure was used was that of acquired loans. The excess of expected cash flows above the fair value of the majority of loans will be accreted to interest income over the remaining lives of the loans in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310-20.

Certain loans, for which specific credit-related deterioration since origination was identified, are recorded at fair value reflecting the present value of the amounts expected to be collected. Income recognition on these “purchased credit impaired” loans is based on a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows to be collected. Acquired loans deemed impaired and considered collateral dependent, with the timing of the sale of loan collateral indeterminate, remain on nonaccrual status and have no accretable yield. All purchased credit impaired loans were classified as accruing loans as of and subsequent to the acquisition date.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles there was no carryover of the allowance for loan losses that had been previously recorded by PRB.

The Company recorded a deferred income tax asset of $2.3 million related to PRB’s operating loss carry-forward and other tax attributes of PRB, along with the effects of fair value adjustments resulting from applying the purchase method of accounting.

The fair value of savings and transaction deposit accounts acquired from PRB were assumed to approximate their carrying value as these accounts have no stated maturity and are payable on demand. Certificates of deposit accounts were valued by comparing the contractual cost of the portfolio to an identical portfolio bearing current market rates. The portfolio was segregated into pools based on remaining maturity. For each pool, the projected cash flows from maturing certificates were then calculated based on contractual rates and prevailing market rates. The valuation adjustment for each pool is equal to the present value of the difference of

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

these two cash flows, discounted at the assumed market rate for a ce rtificate with a corresponding maturity. This valuation adjustment will be accreted to reduce interest expense over the remaining maturities of the respective pools. The Company also recorded a core deposit intangible, which represents the value of the dep osit relationships acquired from PRB, of $1.1 million. The core deposit intangible will be amortized over a period of 7 years.

Pro Forma Information (unaudited)

The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the acquisition of PRB had occurred on January 1, 2015, for the nine months period ending September 30, 2015, after giving effect to certain adjustments. The unaudited pro forma information for these periods includes adjustments for interest income on loans acquired, amortization of intangibles arising from the transaction, adjustments for interest expense on deposits acquired, and the related income tax effects of all these items and the income tax benefits derived from PRB’s loss before taxes. The net effect of these pro forma adjustments was an increase of $0.2 million in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the transaction been effected on the assumed dates.

		Pro Forma
(dollars in thousands)
Net interest income	$	42,386
Provision for loan losses		1,473
Noninterest income		19,610
Noninterest expenses		47,050
Income before taxes		13,473
Taxes on income		5,728
Net income	$	7,745

Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.76
Diluted	$	0.73

The revenues (net interest income and noninterest income) and net income for the period from June 16, 2015 to September 30, 2015 related to the operations acquired from PRB and included in the results of operations for 2015 was approximately $1.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

NOTE 3 : FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

F air value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Current accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Company's own assumptions requiring significant judgment or estimation about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The following tables show the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of:

			Fair Value Measurement Level
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
(dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2016:
Investment securities available for sale:
US Treasury securities	$	300	$	300	$	—	$	—
Agency mortgage-backed securities		498,886		—		498,886		—
Beneficial interest – FHLMC securitizations		43,517		—		—		43,517
Total assets at fair value on a recurring basis	$	542,703	$	300	$	498,886	$	43,517

December 31, 2015:
Investment securities available for sale:
US Treasury securities	$	300	$	300	$	—	$	—
FNMA and FHLB Agency notes		16,013		—		16,013		—
Agency mortgage-backed securities		536,148		—		536,148		—
Beneficial interest – FHLMC securitizations		12,674		—		—		12,674
Total assets at fair value on a recurring basis	$	565,135	$	300	$	552,161	$	12,674

The increase in level 3 assets from December 31, 2015 was due to Beneficial interest – FHLMC securitization purchases. The Company did not have any material assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We have elected to use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available for sale are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to measure at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

Fair value estimates are made at a discrete point in time based on relevant market information and other information about the financial instruments. Because no active market exists for a significant portion of our financial instruments, fair value estimat es are based in large part on judgments we make primarily regarding current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, prepayment rates, and future expected loss experience. These estimates are subjective in nature and inva riably involve some inherent uncertainties. Additionally, unexpected changes in events or circumstances can occur that could require us to make changes to our assumptions and which, in turn, could significantly affect and require us to make changes to our previous estimates of fair value.

In addition, the fair value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of existing and anticipated future customer relationships and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments, such as premises and equipment and other real estate owned.

The Company does not currently have any material assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents . The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates its carrying value.

Investment Securities Available for Sale . Investment securities available-for-sale are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. When a market is illiquid or there is a lack of transparency around the inputs to valuation, the securities are classified as Level 3 and reliance is placed upon internally developed models, and management judgment and evaluation for valuation. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as level 3 include beneficial interests – FHLMC securitization. Significant assumptions in the valuation of these Level 3 securities as of September 30, 2016 included a prepayment rate of 15% and discount rates ranging from 4.0% to 10%.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (the “FHLB”). As a member, we are required to own stock of the FHLB, the amount of which is based primarily on the level of our borrowings from this institution. The fair value of that stock is equal to the carrying amount, is classified as restricted securities and is periodically evaluated for impairment based on our assessment of the ultimate recoverability of our investments in that stock. Any cash or stock dividends paid to us on such stock are reported as income.

Loans Held for Sale. Mortgage loans originated or transferred and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value, as determined by outstanding commitments from investors. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recorded as a valuation allowance and charged to earnings.

Loans . The fair value for loans with variable interest rates is the carrying amount. The fair value of fixed rate loans is derived by calculating the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be received by the various homogeneous categories of loans. All loans have been adjusted to reflect changes in credit risk.

Impaired Loans . ASC 820-10 applies to loans measured for impairment in accordance with ASC 310-10, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”, including impaired loans measured at an observable market price (if available), and at the fair value of the loan’s collateral (if the loan is collateral dependent) less estimated selling cost. The fair value of an impaired loan is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, we measure the impaired loan at nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available, or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price or a discounted cash flow has been used to determine the fair value, we measure the impaired loan at nonrecurring Level 3.

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

Mortgage Servicing Righ ts . Fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques that would incorporate assumptions that market participants would use in estimating the fair value of servicing. These assumptions might include estimat es of prepayment speeds, discount rate, costs to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late fees, among other considerations. Mortgage servicing rights are considered a Level 3 measurement at September 30, 2016 and are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets

Deposits . The fair value of demand deposits, savings deposits, and money market deposits is defined as the amounts payable on demand at quarter-end. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated based on the discounted value of the future cash flows expected to be paid on the deposits, using current market rates.

Borrowings . The fair value of $951 million in borrowings is the carrying value of overnight FHLB advances that approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of this instrument, resulting in a Level 2 classification. The fair value of term borrowings is derived by calculating the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid out by the Company. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments are as follows as of:

	Carrying		Fair Value Measurement Level
(dollars in thousands)	Value		1		2		3		Total
September 30, 2016:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	496,813	$	496,813	$	—	$	—	$	496,813
Securities AFS		542,703		300		498,886		43,517		542,703
Loans		2,295,229		—		—		2,313,425		2,313,425
Loans held for sale		200,002		—		—		200,002		200,002
Investment in FHLB stock		25,677		—		25,677		—		25,677

Liabilities:
Deposits		2,338,737		1,787,742		551,051		—		2,338,737
Borrowings		951,000		—		951,000		—		951,000

December 31, 2015:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	215,748	$	215,748	$	—	$	—	$	215,748
Securities AFS		565,135		300		552,161		12,674		565,135
Loans		1,754,883		—		—		1,779,941		1,779,941
Investment in FHLB stock		21,492		—		21,492		—		21,492

Liabilities:
Deposits		1,522,176		1,051,976		470,128		—		1,522,104
Borrowings		796,000		—		796,000		—		796,000

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

NOTE 4 : SECURITIES

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s securities AFS portfolio as of:

	Amortized		Gross Unrealized					Estimated
(dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
September 30, 2016:
US Treasury securities	$	300	$	—	$	—		$	300
Agency mortgage-backed securities		489,233		9,749		(96	)		498,886
Beneficial interests in FHLMC securitization		44,505		121		(1,109	)		43,517
Total	$	534,038	$	9,870	$	(1,205	)	$	542,703

December 31, 2015:
US Treasury securities	$	300	$	—	$	—		$	300
FNMA and FHLB Agency notes		16,108		—		(95	)		16,013
Agency mortgage-backed securities		538,269		909		(3,030	)		536,148
Beneficial interests in FHLMC securitization		12,674		476		(476	)		12,674
Total	$	567,351	$	1,385	$	(3,601	)	$	565,135

The US Treasury securities are pledged as collateral to the State of California to meet regulatory requirements related to the Bank’s trust operations.

The tables belo w indicate , a s o f September 30 , 2016 and December 31, 2015 th e gros s unrealize d losse s an d fai r value s o f ou r investments , aggregate d b y investmen t categor y and lengt h o f tim e tha t th e individua l securitie s hav e bee n i n a continuou s unrealize d los s position.

	Securities with Unrealized Loss at September 30, 2016
	Less than 12 months					12 months or more				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value			Unrealized Loss		Fair Value			Unrealized Loss	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Agency and FHLB Agency notes	$	46,649	$	(96	)	$	—	$	—	$	46,649	$	(96	)
Beneficial interests in FHLMC securitization		31,645		(1,109	)		—		—		31,645		(1,109	)
	$	78,294	$	(1,205	)	$	—	$	—	$	78,294	$	(1,205	)

	Securities with Unrealized Loss at December 31, 2015
	Less than 12 months					12 months or more				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value			Unrealized Loss		Fair Value			Unrealized Loss	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Agency notes	$	16,013	$	(95	)	$	—	$	—	$	16,013	$	(95	)
Agency mortgage backed securities		397,850		(3,030	)		—		—		397,850		(3,030	)
Beneficial interests in FHLMC securitization		12,674		(476	)		—		—		12,674		(476	)
	$	426,537	$	(3,601	)	$	—	$	—	$	426,537	$	(3,601	)

Unrealized losses in agency and FHLB agency notes, agency mortgage backed securities, and beneficial interests in FHLMC securitizations have not been recognized into income because the issuer bonds are of high credit quality, management does not intend to sell, it is not more likely than not that management would be required to sell the securities prior to their anticipated recovery, and the decline in fair value is largely due to changes in discount rates and assumptions regarding future interest rates. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach maturity.

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

The scheduled mat urities of securities AFS and the related weighted average yield s were as follows as of September 30, 2016 :

(dollars in thousands)	Less than 1 Year			1 Through 5 years			5 Through 10 Years			After 10 Years			Total
Amortized Cost:
US Treasury securities	$	—		$	300		$	—		$	—		$	300
Weighted average yield		—	%		0.90	%		—	%		—	%		0.90	%

Estimated Fair Value:
US Treasury Securities	$	—		$	300		$	—		$	—		$	300

Agency mortgage backed securities and beneficial interests in FHLMC securitizations are excluded from the above table because such securities are not due at a single maturity date. The weighted average yield of the agency mortgage backed securities and beneficial interests in FHLMC securitizations as of September 30, 2016 was 2.59%.

NOTE 5: LOANS

The following is a summary of our loans as of:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Outstanding principal balance:
Loans secured by real estate:
Residential properties:
Multifamily	$	986,921	$	627,311
Single family		576,886		533,257
Total real estate loans secured by residential properties		1,563,807		1,160,568
Commercial properties		459,703		358,791
Land and construction		20,034		12,320
Total real estate loans		2,043,544		1,531,679
Commercial and industrial loans		228,579		196,584
Consumer loans		34,248		37,206
Total loans		2,306,371		1,765,469
Premiums, discounts and deferred fees and expenses		2,458		14
Total	$	2,308,829	$	1,765,483

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the principal balances shown above are net of unaccreted discount related to loans acquired in an acquisition of $2.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

In 2012 and 2015, the Company purchased loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The carrying amount of these purchased credit impaired loans is as follows as of:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Outstanding principal balance:
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial properties	$	298		$	533
Land		—			1,616
Total real estate loans		298			2,149
Commercial and industrial loans		6,192			6,787
Consumer loans		5			14
Total loans		6,495			8,950
Unaccreted discount on purchased credit impaired loans		(1,625	)		(2,291	)
Total	$	4,870		$	6,659

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

Accretable yield, or income expected to be collected on purchased credit impaired loans, and the related changes, is as follows for the periods indicated:

(dollars in thousands)	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Year Ended December 31, 2015

Beginning balance	$	582		$	130
Accretion of income		(155	)		(529	)
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference		—			176
Acquisition		—			805
Disposals		(108	)		—
Ending balance	$	319		$	582

The following table summarizes our delinquent and nonaccrual loans as of:

	Past Due and Still Accruing												Total Past
(dollars in thousands)	30–59 Days			60-89 Days			90 Days or More			Nonaccrual			Due and Nonaccrual			Current		Total
September 30, 2016:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	4,021		$	4,021		$	1,559,786	$	1,563,807
Commercial properties		1,363			—			780			1,187			3,330			456,373		459,703
Land and construction		—			—			—			—			—			20,034		20,034
Commercial and industrial loans		4,145			5			3,136			4,184			11,470			217,109		228,579
Consumer loans		18			—			—			14			32			34,216		34,248
Total	$	5,526		$	5		$	3,916		$	9,406		$	18,853		$	2,287,518	$	2,306,371

Percentage of total loans		0.24	%		—	%		0.17	%		0.41	%		0.82	%

December 31, 2015:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,160,568	$	1,160,568
Commercial properties		1,232			—			793			1,552			3,577			355,214		358,791
Land and construction		—			—			—			—			—			12,320		12,320
Commercial and industrial loans		2,425			1,639			5,713			2,509			12,286			184,298		196,584
Consumer loans		1,010			—			1,991			75			3,076			34,130		37,206
Total	$	4,667		$	1,639		$	8,497		$	4,136		$	18,939		$	1,746,530	$	1,765,469

Percentage of total loans		0.26	%		0.09	%		0.48	%		0.23	%		1.07	%

The level of delinquent loans and nonaccrual loans have been adversely impacted by the loans acquired from acquisitions. As of September 30, 2016, of the $13.3 million in loans over 90 days past due, including loans on nonaccrual, $4.5 million, or 34% were loans acquired from acquisitions.

Accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal and, generally, when a loan becomes contractually past due for ninety days or more with respect to principal or interest. The accrual of interest may be continued on a well-secured loan contractually past due ninety days or more with respect to principal or interest if the loan is in the process of collection or collection of the principal and interest is deemed probable. The Bank considers a loan to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it believes it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The determination of past due, nonaccrual or impairment status of loans acquired in an acquisition, other than loans deemed purchased impaired, is the same as loans we originate.

The troubled debt restructure (“TDR”) activity during the first nine months of 2016 consisted of 6 commercial and industrial loans, with a recorded investment of $3.9 million, whose payment terms were restructured. The TDR activity during the first nine months of 2015 consisted of two commercial and industrial loans, with a recorded investment of $0.5 million, whose payment terms were restructured.

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

NOTE 6: ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The following is a roll forward of the Bank’s allowance for loan losses for the following periods:

(dollars in thousands)	Beginning Balance		Provision for Loan Losses			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Ending Balance
Quarter Ended September 30, 2016:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	5,353	$	951		$	—		$	—	$	6,304
Commercial properties		1,887		572			—			169		2,628
Land and construction		272		(70	)							202
Commercial and industrial loans		4,139		31			—			—		4,170
Consumer loans		549		(253	)		—			—		296
Total	$	12,200	$	1,231		$	—		$	169	$	13,600

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	6,799	$	(495	)	$	—		$	—	$	6,304
Commercial properties		1,813		696			(50	)		169		2,628
Land and construction		103		99								202
Commercial and industrial loans		1,649		2,521			—			—		4,170
Consumer loans		236		60			—			—		296
Total	$	10,600	$	2,881		$	(50	)	$	169	$	13,600

Year Ended December 31, 2015:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	6,546	$	253		$	—		$	—	$	6,799
Commercial properties		1,499		624			(310	)		—		1,813
Land and construction		67		36			—			—		103
Commercial and industrial loans		1,897		1,665			(1,913	)		—		1,649
Consumer loans		141		95			—			—		236
Total	$	10,150	$	2,673		$	(2,223	)	$	—	$	10,600

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by impairment method as of:

(dollars in thousands)	Allowance for Loan Losses								Unaccreted Credit
	Evaluated for Impairment				Purchased				Component
	Individually		Collectively		Impaired		Total		Other Loans
September 30, 2016:
Allowance for loan losses:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—	$	6,304	$	—	$	6,304	$	148
Commercial properties		—		2,628		—		2,628		149
Land and construction		—		202		—		202		3
Commercial and industrial loans		—		4,170		—		4,170		161
Consumer loans		—		296		—		296		20
Total	$	—	$	13,600	$	—	$	13,600	$	481
Loans:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	3,844	$	1,559,963	$	—	$	1,563,807	$	13,472
Commercial properties		1,187		458,334		182		459,703		24,982
Land and construction		—		20,034		—		20,034		436
Commercial and industrial loans		2,653		221,238		4,688		228,579		24,157
Consumer loans		14		34,234		—		34,248		1,477
Total	$	7,698	$	2,293,803	$	4,870	$	2,306,371	$	64,524

December 31, 2015:
Allowance for loan losses:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—	$	6,799	$	—	$	6,799	$	127
Commercial properties		30		1,783		—		1,813		363
Land and construction		—		103		—		103		42
Commercial and industrial loans		—		1,649		—		1,649		187
Consumer loans		—		236		—		236		13
Total	$	30	$	10,570	$	—	$	10,600	$	732
Loans:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—	$	1,160,568	$	—	$	1,160,568	$	7,747
Commercial properties		6,275		352,162		354		358,791		43,287
Land and construction		—		11,180		1,140		12,320		4,267
Commercial and industrial loans		5,687		185,732		5,165		196,584		28,231
Consumer loans		76		37,130		—		37,206		1,761
Total	$	12,038	$	1,746,772	$	6,659	$	1,765,469	$	85,293

The column labeled “Unaccreted Credit Component Other Loans” represents the amount of unaccreted credit component discount for loans acquired in an acquisition that were not classified as purchased impaired or individually evaluated for impairment as of the dates indicated, and the stated principal balance of the related loans. The unaccreted credit component discount is equal to 0.75% and 0.86% of the stated principal balance of these loans as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In addition to this unaccreted credit component discount, an additional $0.4 million and $0.3 million of the ALLL has been provided for these loans as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

The Bank categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, collateral adequacy, credit documentation, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Bank analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis typically includes larger, non-homogeneous loans such as loans secured by multifamily or commercial real estate and commerc ial and industrial loans. This analysis is performed on an ongoing basis as new information is obtained. The Bank uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass: Loans classified as pass are strong credits with no existing or known potential weaknesses deserving of management’s close attention.

Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Impaired: A loan is considered impaired, when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Purchased credit impaired loans are not considered impaired loans for these purposes.

Loans listed as pass include larger non-homogeneous loans not meeting the risk rating definitions above and smaller, homogeneous loans not assessed on an individual basis.

Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows as of:

(dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Impaired		Total
September 30, 2016:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	1,556,117	$	3,846	$	—	$	3,844	$	1,563,807
Commercial properties		456,548		—		1,968		1,187		459,703
Land and construction		20,034		—		—		—		20,034
Commercial and industrial loans		207,574		1,913		16,439		2,653		228,579
Consumer loans		34,234		—		—		14		34,248
Total	$	2,274,507	$	5,759	$	18,407	$	7,698	$	2,306,371

December 31, 2015:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	1,159,029	$	1,539	$	—	$	—	$	1,160,568
Commercial properties		351,988		174		354		6,275		358,791
Land and construction		11,180		—		1,140		—		12,320
Commercial and industrial loans		180,755		4,977		5,165		5,687		196,584
Consumer loans		37,130		—		—		76		37,206
Total	$	1,740,082	$	6,690	$	6,659	$	12,038	$	1,765,469

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

Impaired loans evaluated individually and any relate d allowance are as follows as of :

	With No Allowance Recorded					With an Allowance Recorded
(dollars in thousands)	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment			Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Related Allowance
September 30, 2016 :
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	3,844	$	3,844		$		$		$
Commercial properties		1,187		1,187			—		—		—
Commercial and industrial loans		2,653		2,653			—		—		—
Consumer		14		14			—		—		—
Total	$	7,698	$	7,698		$	—	$	—	$	—

December 31, 2015 :
Real estate loans:
Commercial properties	$	5,925	$	5,925	$		590	$	350	$	30
Commercial and industrial loans		7,770		5,687			—		—		—
Consumer loans		114		76			—		—		—
Total	$	13,809	$	11,688		$	590	$	350	$	30

The weighted average annualized average balance of the recorded investment for impaired loans, beginning from when the loan became impaired, and any interest income recorded on impaired loans after they became impaired is as follows for the:

	Nine months Ended September 30, 2016				Year Ended December 31, 2015
(dollars in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income after Impairment		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income after Impairment
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—	$	—	$	27	$	2
Commercial properties		1,788		5		6,487		281
Commercial and industrial loans		1,600		19		7,850		394
Consumer loans		3		—		105		—
Total	$	3,391	$	24	$	14,469	$	677

There was no interest income recognized on a cash basis in either 2016 or 2015 on impaired loans.

NOTE 7: DEPOSITS

The following table summarizes the outstanding balance of deposits and average rates paid thereon as of:

	September 30, 2016					December 31, 2015
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate

Demand deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	775,466		—		$	299,794		—
Interest-bearing		175,782		0.436	%		260,167		0.359	%
Money market and savings		836,494		0.697	%		492,015		0.531	%
Certificates of deposits		550,995		0.587	%		470,200		0.554	%
Total	$	2,338,737		0.420	%	$	1,522,176		0.404	%

At September 30, 2016, of the $179.5 million of certificates of deposits of $250,000 or more, $174.3 million mature within one year and $5.2 million mature after one year. Of the $371.4 million of certificates of deposit of less than $250,000, $360.4 million mature within one year and $11.0 million mature after one year. At December 31, 2015, of the $149.2 million of certificates of

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

deposits of $250,000 or more, $ 137.8 million mature within one year and $ 11.4 million mature after one year. Of the $321 million of certificates of deposit of l ess than $250,000, $292.5 million mature within one year and $28.5 million mature after one year.

NOTE 8: BORROWINGS

At September 30, 2016, our borrowings consisted of $951 million of overnight FHLB advances. At December 31, 2015, our borrowings consisted of $796.0 million of overnight FHLB advances. The FHLB advances were paid in full in the early part of October 2016 and January 2016, respectively, and bore interest rates of 0.38% and 0.27%, respectively. Because the Bank utilizes overnight borrowings, the balance of outstanding borrowings fluctuates on a daily basis. The average balance of overnight borrowings during the first nine months of 2016 was $499 million, as compared to $353 million during all of 2015.

NOTE 9: EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock that would then share in earnings. The following table sets forth the Company’s unaudited earnings per share calculations for the periods indicated:

	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016				Quarter Ended September 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Basic		Diluted		Basic		Diluted

Net income	$	9,675	$	9,675	$	2,762	$	2,762

Basic common shares outstanding		16,257,008		16,257,008		12,623,924		12,623,924
Effect of contingent shares issuable				796				796
Effect of options and restricted stock				530,143				450,215
Diluted common shares outstanding				16,787,947				13,074,935

Earnings per share	$	0.60	$	0.58	$	0.22	$	0.21

Based on a weighted average basis, options to purchase 14,500 shares of common stock were excluded for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Basic		Diluted		Basic		Diluted

Net income	$	16,786	$	16,786	$	8,330	$	8,330

Basic common shares outstanding		16,132,112		16,132,112		9,534,056		9,534,056
Effect of contingent shares issuable				796				796
Effect of options and restricted stock				549,899				394,593
Diluted common shares outstanding				16,682,807				9,929,445

Earnings per share	$	1.04	$	1.01	$	0.87	$	0.84

Based on a weighted average basis, options to purchase 4,401 and 56,847 shares of common stock were excluded for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 – UNAUDITED

NOTE 10 : SEGMENT REPORTING

For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had two reportable business segments: Banking (FFB and FFIS) and Wealth Management (FFA). The results of FFI and any elimination entries are included in the column labeled Other. The following tables show key operating results for each of our business segments used to arrive at our consolidated totals for the following periods:

(dollars in thousands)	Banking		Wealth Management		Other			Total
Quarter ended September 30, 2016:
Interest income	$	26,004	$	—	$	—		$	26,004
Interest expense		2,841		—		—			2,841
Net interest income		23,163		—		—			23,163
Provision for loan losses		1,231		—		—			1,231
Noninterest income		9,923		5,319		(163	)		15,079
Noninterest expense		16,134		4,697		705			21,536
Income (loss) before taxes on income	$	15,721	$	622	$	(868	)	$	15,475


Quarter ended September 30, 2015:
Interest income	$	17,108	$	—	$	—		$	17,108
Interest expense		1,509		—		138			1,647
Net interest income		15,599		—		(138	)		15,461
Provision for loan losses		570		—		—			570
Noninterest income		1,839		5,171		(142	)		6,868
Noninterest expense		11,653		4,685		618			16,956
Income (loss) before taxes on income	$	5,215	$	486	$	(898	)	$	4,803

		Banking				Wealth Management				Other						Total
Nine months ended September 30, 2016:
Interest income		$		72,275		$		—		$		—				$		72,275
Interest expense				7,830				—				—						7,830
Net interest income				64,445				—				—						64,445
Provision for loan losses				2,881				—				—						2,881
Noninterest income				11,505				15,917				(448		)				26,974
Noninterest expense				43,746				14,536				2,521						60,803
Income (loss) before taxes on income		$		29,323		$		1,381		$		(2,969		)		$		27,735

Nine months ended September 30, 2015:
Interest income	$		45,259		$		—		$		—				$		45,259
Interest expense			3,829				—				674						4,503
Net interest income			41,430				—				(674		)				40,756
Provision for loan losses			1,473				—				—						1,473
Noninterest income			4,501				15,426				(435		)				19,492
Noninterest expense			28,138				13,950				2,200						44,288
Income (loss) before taxes on income	$		16,320		$		1,476		$		(3,309		)		$		14,487

I TEM 2 .

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends in our businesses that accounted for the changes in our results of operations in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to our results of operations in the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015; and our financial condition at September 30, 2016 as compared to our financial condition at December 31, 2015. This discussion and analysis is based on and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report and our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the notes thereto, which are set forth in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K (“our 2015 10-K”) which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 15, 2016.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this report that are not historical facts or that discuss our expectations, beliefs or views regarding our future financial performance or future financial condition, or financial or other trends in our business or in the markets in which we operate, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Often, they include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may.” Such forward-looking statements are based on current information that is available to us, and on assumptions that we make, about future events or economic or financial conditions or trends over which we do not have control. In addition, our businesses and the markets in which we operate are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Those risks and uncertainties, and unexpected future events, could cause our financial condition or actual operating results in the future to differ, possibly significantly, from our expected financial condition and operating results that are set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

The principal risks and uncertainties to which our businesses are subject are discussed in Item 1A in our 2015 10-K and in this Item 2 below. Therefore, you are urged to read not only the information contained in this Item 2, but also the risk factors and other cautionary information contained in Item 1A of our 2015 10-K, which qualify the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

Due to these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report and not to make predictions about our future financial performance based solely on our historical financial performance. We also disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements contained in this report or in our 2015 10-K, except as may otherwise be required by applicable law or government regulations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and accounting practices in the banking industry. Certain of those accounting policies are considered critical accounting policies, because they require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding circumstances or trends that could materially affect the value of those assets, such as economic conditions or trends that could impact our ability to fully collect our loans or ultimately realize the carrying value of certain of our other assets. Those estimates and assumptions are made based on current information available to us regarding those economic conditions or trends or other circumstances. If changes were to occur in the events, trends or other circumstances on which our estimates or assumptions were based, or other unanticipated events were to occur that might affect our operations, we may be required under GAAP to adjust our earlier estimates and to reduce the carrying values of the affected assets on our balance sheet, generally by means of charges against income, which could also affect our results of operations in the fiscal periods when those charges are recognized. There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies as described in our 2015 10-K.

Utilization and Valuation of Deferred Income Tax Benefits. We record as a “deferred tax asset” on our balance sheet an amount equal to the tax credit and tax loss carryforwards and tax deductions (collectively “tax benefits”) that we believe will be available to us to offset or reduce income taxes in future periods. Under applicable federal and state income tax laws and regulations, tax benefits related to tax loss carryforwards will expire if they cannot be used within specified periods of time. Accordingly, the ability to fully use our deferred tax asset related to tax loss carryforwards to reduce income taxes in the future depends on the amount of taxable income that we generate during those time periods. At least once each year, or more frequently, if warranted, we make estimates of future taxable income that we believe we are likely to generate during those future periods. If we conclude, on the basis of those estimates and the amount of the tax benefits available to us, that it is more likely, than not, that we will be able to fully utilize those tax benefits prior to their expiration, we recognize the deferred tax asset in full on our balance sheet. On the other hand, if we conclude on the basis of those estimates and the amount of the tax benefits available to us that it has become more likely, than not, that

we will be unable to utilize those tax benefits in full prior to their expiration, then, we would establish a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax asset on our balance sheet to the amount with respect to which we believe it is still more likely, than not, that we will be able to use to offset or reduce taxes in the future. The establishment of such a valuation allowance, or any increase in an existing valuation allowance, would be effectuated through a charge to the provision for income taxes or a reduction in any income tax credit for the period in which such valuation allowance is established or increased.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. Our ALLL is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense and may be increased by a recapture of previously established chargeoffs. Loans are charged against the ALLL when management believes that collectability of the principal is unlikely. The ALLL is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible based on an evaluation of the collectability of loans and prior loan loss experience. This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, current economic conditions and certain other subjective factors that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. While we use the best information available to make this evaluation, future adjustments to our ALLL may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic or other conditions that can affect the collectability in full of loans in our loan portfolio.

Adoption of new or revised accounting standards. For some accounting standards, we may elect to take advantage of the extended transition period afforded by the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012 (or “JOBS Act”), for the implementation of new or revised accounting standards. As a result, we may not be required to comply with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies or we cease to be an “emerging growth” company as defined in the JOBS Act. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to the financials statements of companies that comply with public company effective dates.

We have two business segments, “Banking” and “Investment Management and Wealth Planning” (“Wealth Management”). Banking includes the operations of FFB and FFIS and Wealth Management includes the operations of FFA. The financial position and operating results of the stand-alone holding company, FFI, are included under the caption “Other” in certain of the tables that follow, along with any consolidation elimination entries.

Recent Developments and Overview

We experienced strong growth during the first nine months of 2016 with loan originations of $1.3 billion and deposit growth of $817 million. Our assets under management (“AUM”) in Wealth Management increased $126 million during the first nine months of 2016. Revenues and income before taxes continue to increase as our investments in staffing and systems are resulting in higher levels of interest earnings assets.

A $7.2 million gain was realized on the sale of $265 million of loans secured by multifamily properties to Freddie Mac who securitized the loans as part of their small balance loan program. The agreement with Freddie Mac to sell these loans provided for changes in pricing based upon changes in rates on certain treasury swap indices. In an effort to reduce the interest rate risk associated with this agreement, we entered into a swap agreement. In conjunction with the finalization of pricing under the agreement, we closed out our swap position and paid $2.4 million, including fees, to counterparties under the swap agreement, and the pricing on the loan sale increased by $2.2 million.

As of September 30, 2016, we have $200 million of multifamily loans classified as loans held for sale as part of a future sale and securitization of these loans.

A $0.8 million reduction in taxes on income was realized in the third quarter as a result of the early adoption of ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvement to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). Under this new standard, excess tax benefits and deficiencies resulting from the exercise of, or vesting of, stock awards are now recognized as income tax benefit or expense in the period in which they occur. For purposes of determining an annual effective tax rate, the excess tax benefits or deficiencies cannot be included but rather are required to be treated as discrete items in the period in which they occur. In addition, for diluted earnings per share calculations, excess tax benefits are no longer included in assumed proceeds when determining average diluted shares outstanding under the treasury stock method. As set forth in ASU 2016-09, we recognized the impact of these changes on a prospective basis and included any activity that occurred since January 1, 2016 in the results for the third quarter of 2016.

Results of Operations

Our net income for the quarter and nine months ending September 30, 2016 was $9.7 million and $16.8 million, respectively as compared to $2.8 million and $8.3 million for the corresponding periods in 2015. Income before taxes for the quarter and nine months ending September 30, 2016 was $15.5 million and $27.7 million, respectively, as compared to $4.8 million and $14.5 million for the corresponding periods in 2015. The effective tax rate, which was impacted by the adoption in the third quarter of 2016 of ASU 2016-09, was 39.5% and 42.5% for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The primary sources of revenue for Banking are net interest income, fees from its deposits, trust and insurance services, fees charged for consulting and administrative services and certain loan fees. The primary source of revenue for Wealth Management is asset management fees assessed on the balance of AUM. Compensation and benefit costs, which represent the largest component of noninterest expense accounted for 57% and 76%, respectively, of the total noninterest expense for Banking and Wealth Management in the first nine months of 2016.

The following table shows key operating results for each of our business segments for the quarter ended September 30:

(dollars in thousands)	Banking		Wealth Management		Other			Total
2016:
Interest income	$	26,004	$	—	$	—		$	26,004
Interest expense		2,841		—		—			2,841
Net interest income		23,163		—		—			23,163
Provision for loan losses		1,231		—		—			1,231
Noninterest income		9,923		5,319		(163	)		15,079
Noninterest expense		16,134		4,697		705			21,536
Income (loss) before taxes on income	$	15,721	$	622	$	(868	)	$	15,475
2015:
Interest income	$	17,108	$	—	$	—		$	17,108
Interest expense		1,509		—		138			1,647
Net interest income		15,599		—		(138	)		15,461
Provision for loan losses		570		—		—			570
Noninterest income		1,839		5,171		(142	)		6,868
Noninterest expense		11,653		4,685		618			16,956
Income (loss) before taxes on income	$	5,215	$	486	$	(898	)	$	4,803

General. Consolidated income before taxes was $15.5 million for the third quarter of 2016 as compared to $4.8 million in the third quarter of 2015. The increase was the result of a $10.5 million increase in income before taxes for Banking and a $0.1 million increase in income before taxes for Wealth Management. The increase in Banking was due to higher net interest income and higher noninterest income which were partially offset by a higher provision for loan losses and higher noninterest expenses. The increase in Wealth Management for the third quarter of 2016 was higher than the third quarter of 2015 due to a $0.1 million increase in noninterest income. Corporate interest expense decreased by $0.1 million due to the payoff of a term note in 2015, while corporate noninterest expenses increased by $0.1 million.

The following table show s key operating results for each of our business segments for the n ine months ended September 30:

(dollars in thousands)	Banking		Wealth Management		Other			Total
2016:
Interest income	$	72,275	$	—	$	—		$	72,275
Interest expense		7,830		—		—			7,830
Net interest income		64,445		—		—			64,445
Provision for loan losses		2,881		—		—			2,881
Noninterest income		11,505		15,917		(448	)		26,974
Noninterest expense		43,746		14,536		2,521			60,803
Income (loss) before taxes on income	$	29,323	$	1,381	$	(2,969	)	$	27,735
2015:
Interest income	$	45,259	$	—	$	—		$	45,259
Interest expense		3,829		—		674			4,503
Net interest income		41,430		—		(674	)		40,756
Provision for loan losses		1,473		—		—			1,473
Noninterest income		4,501		15,426		(435	)		19,492
Noninterest expense		28,138		13,950		2,200			44,288
Income (loss) before taxes on income	$	16,320	$	1,476	$	(3,309	)	$	14,487

General. Consolidated income before taxes for the first nine months of 2016 was $27.7 million as compared to $14.5 million for the first nine months of 2015. The increase was the result of a $13.0 million increase in income before taxes for Banking and a $0.3 million decrease in corporate expenses, which were partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in earnings before taxes for Wealth Management. The increase in Banking was due primarily to higher net interest income and higher noninterest income which were partially offset by a higher provision for loans losses and higher noninterest expenses. The decrease in Wealth Management was due to higher noninterest expenses which were partially offset by higher noninterest income. Corporate interest expense decreased $0.7 million due to the payoff of a term note in 2015, while corporate noninterest expenses increased by $0.3 million.

Net Interest Income. The following tables set forth , for the periods indicated, information regarding (i) the total dollar amount of interest income from interest-earning assets and the resultant average yields on those assets; (ii) the total dollar amount of interest expense and the average rate of interest on our interest-bearing liabilities; (iii) net interest income; (iv) net interest rate spread; and (v) net y ield on interest-earning assets :

	Quarter Ended September 30:
	2016							2015
(dollars in thousands)	Average Balances		Interest		Average Yield / Rate			Average Balances		Interest		Average Yield / Rate

Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	2,357,956	$	22,231		3.77	%	$	1,562,960	$	15,634		4.00	%
Securities		508,193		3,202		2.52	%		190,107		1,107		2.33	%
Fed funds, FHLB stock, and deposits		77,731		571		2.92	%		49,917		367		2.91	%
Total interest-earning assets		2,943,880		26,004		3.53	%		1,802,984		17,108		3.79	%

Noninterest-earning assets:
Nonperforming assets		8,794							2,553
Other		38,379							31,529
Total assets	$	2,991,053						$	1,837,066

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	191,133		213		0.44	%	$	315,933		379		0.48	%
Money market and savings		761,778		1,307		0.68	%		310,962		452		0.58	%
Certificates of deposit		568,068		906		0.63	%		370,959		497		0.53	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,520,979		2,426		0.63	%		997,854		1,328		0.53	%
Borrowings		362,576		415		0.46	%		334,022		319		0.38	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,883,555		2,841		0.60	%		1,331,876		1,647		0.49	%

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		806,861							300,414
Other liabilities		18,578							10,492
Total liabilities		2,708,994							1,642,782
Shareholders’ equity		282,059							194,284
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,991,053						$	1,837,066

Net Interest Income			$	23,163						$	15,461

Net Interest Rate Spread						2.93	%						3.30	%

Net Yield on Interest-earning Assets						3.15	%						3.43	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30:
	2016							2015
(dollars in thousands)	Average Balances		Interest		Average Yield / Rate			Average Balances		Interest		Average Yield / Rate

Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	2,143,315	$	61,362		3.82	%	$	1,378,191	$	41,097		3.98	%
Securities		525,089		9,423		2.39	%		154,538		2,744		2.37	%
Fed funds, FHLB stock, and deposits		62,147		1,490		3.20	%		41,837		1,418		4.53	%
Total interest-earning assets		2,730,551		72,275		3.53	%		1,574,566		45,259		3.83	%

Noninterest-earning assets:
Nonperforming assets		6,682							1,724
Other		35,450							22,886
Total assets	$	2,772,683						$	1,599,176

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	223,490		779		0.47	%	$	298,613		1,022		0.46	%
Money market and savings		636,612		3,087		0.65	%		236,699		1,030		0.58	%
Certificates of deposit		509,790		2,328		0.61	%		315,488		1,314		0.56	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,369,892		6,194		0.60	%		850,800		3,366		0.53	%
Borrowings		499,191		1,636		0.44	%		334,260		1,137		0.45	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,869,083		7,830		0.56	%		1,185,060		4,503		0.51	%

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		615,049							269,930
Other liabilities		15,573							10,075
Total liabilities		2,499,705							1,465,065
Shareholders’ equity		272,978							134,111
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,772,683						$	1,599,176

Net Interest Income			$	64,445						$	40,756

Net Interest Rate Spread						2.97	%						3.33	%

Net Yield on Interest-earning Assets						3.15	%						3.45	%

Net interest income is impacted by the volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), interest rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume) and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table provides a breakdown of the changes in net interest income due to volume and rate changes for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to corresponding periods in 2015:

	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016 vs. 2015									Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 vs. 2015
(dollars in thousands)	Increase (Decrease) due to:										Increase (Decrease) due to:
		Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Interest earned on:
Loans	$	7,525		$	(928	)	$	6,597		$	21,953		$	(1,688	)	$	20,265
Securities		1,997			98			2,095			6,653			26			6,679
Fed funds, FHLB stock, and deposits		203			1			204			567			(495	)		72
Total interest-earning assets		9,725			(829	)		8,896			29,173			(2,157	)		27,016
Interest paid on:
Demand deposits		(139	)		(27	)		(166	)		(269	)		26			(243	)
Money market and savings		760			95			855			1,922			135			2,057
Certificates of deposit		306			103			409			879			135			1,014
Borrowings		23			73			96			537			(38	)		499
Total interest-bearing liabilities		950			244			1,194			3,069			258			3,327
Net interest income	$	8,775		$	(1,073	)	$	7,702		$	26,104		$	(2,415	)	$	23,689

Net interest income increased 50 % from $ 15 . 5 million in the third quarter of 2015 , to $ 2 3 . 2 million in the third quarter of 2016 due primarily to a 63 % increase in interest-earning assets , which was partially offset by a decrease in our net interest rate spread . The decrease in the net interest rate spread from 3.30% in the third quarter of 2015 to 2.93% in the third quarter of 2016 was due to a decrease in yield on total interest-earning assets and an increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased from 3.79% to 3.53% due to an increase in the proportion of lower yielding securities to total interest-earning assets and a decrease in the yield on loans. The decrease in yield on loans was due to prepayments of higher yielding loans and the addition of loans at current ma rket rates which are lower than the current yield on our loan portfolio. The increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities was due primarily to increased costs of borrowings related to higher rates on FHLB advances which were partially offset by the payoff of our higher cost term note in the third quarter of 2015. The average rate on FHLB advances increased from 0.22% in the third quarter of 2015 to 0.46% in the third quarter of 2016.

Net interest income increased 58% from $40.8 million in the first nine months of 2015, to $64.4 million in the first nine months of 2016 due to a 73% increase in interest-earning assets, which was partially offset by a decrease in our net interest rate spread. The decrease in the net interest rate spread from 3.33% in the first nine months of 2015 to 2.97% in the first nine months of 2016 was primarily due to a decrease in yield on total interest-earning assets and an increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased from 3.83% to 3.53% due to an increase in the proportion of lower yielding securities to total interest-earning assets and a decrease in the yield on loans. The decrease in yield on loans was due to prepayments of higher yielding loans and the addition of loans at current market rates which are lower than the current yield on our loan portfolio. The increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities was due primarily to increased costs of borrowings related to higher rates on FHLB advances which were partially offset by the payoff of our higher cost term note in the third quarter of 2015. The average rate on FHLB advances increased from 0.20% in the first nine months of 2015 to 0.44% in the first nine months of 2016.

Provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses represents our estimate of the amount necessary to be charged against the current period’s earnings to maintain the ALLL at a level that we consider adequate in relation to the estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses is impacted by changes in loan balances as well as changes in estimated loss assumptions and charge-offs and recoveries. The amount of the provision also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, current economic conditions and certain other subjective factors that may affect the ability of borrowers to meet their repayment obligations to us. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded provisions for loan losses of $1.2 million and $2.9 million, respectively, as compared to $0.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increases in the provision for loan losses for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015 reflects the increase in loan balances during the 2016 periods when compared to the 2015 periods.

Noninterest income. Noninterest income for Banking includes fees charged to clients for trust services and deposit services, consulting fees, prepayment and late fees charged on loans and insurance commissions. The following table provides a breakdown of noninterest income for Banking for the quarter and nine months ended September 30:

(dollars in thousands)	2016			2015
Quarter Ended September 30:
Trust fees	$	799		$	555
Consulting fees		145			243
Deposit charges		105			125
Gain on sale of loans		7,238			205
Gain on capital markets activities		997			—
Prepayment fees		210			503
Other		429			208
Total noninterest income	$	9,923		$	1,839
Nine Months Ended September 30:
Trust fees	$	2,001		$	1,755
Consulting fees		536			736
Deposit charges		348			315
Gain on sale of loans		7,238			205
Loss on capital markets activities		(1,043	)		—
Prepayment fees		898			998
Other		1,527			492
Total noninterest income	$	11,505		$	4,501

Noninterest income for Banking increased from $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2015 to $9.9 million in the third quarter of 2016 due to a $7.2 million gain on the sale of loans and a $1.0 million gain on the sale of securities realized during the third quarter of 2016. The gain on sale of loans was realized on the sale of $265 million of loans secured by multifamily properties to Freddie Mac who securitized the loans as part of their small balance loan program. $2.2 million of this gain was related to a clause included in the

agreement with Freddie Mac which provided for changes in pricing based upon changes in rates on certain treasury swap indices. During the third quarter of 2016, we decided to sell $64 million of mortgage backed securities that carri ed higher risks of prepayments, resulting in the gain on sale of securities.

Noninterest income for Banking increased from $4.5 million in the first nine months of 2015 to $11.5 million in the first nine months of 2016. This $7.0 million increase was due to the recognition of the following during the first nine months of 2016: a $7.2 million gain on the sale of loans; $1.3 million gain on the sale of securities, $2.4 million of costs incurred to close out a swap and a $0.8 million increase in revenues related to our insurance agency operations. The gain on sale of loans was realized on the sale of $265 million of loans secured by multifamily properties to Freddie Mac who securitized the loans as part of their small balance loan program. The agreement with Freddie Mac to sell these loans provided for changes in pricing based upon changes in rates on certain treasury swap indices. In an effort to reduce the interest rate risk associated with this agreement, we entered into a swap agreement. In conjunction with the finalization of pricing under the agreement, we closed out our swap position and paid $2.4 million, including fees, to counterparties under the swap agreement, and the pricing on the loan sale increased by $2.2 million. During the first nine months of 2016, during favorable market conditions, we sold securities with less desirable features and higher prepayment risk to better position our securities portfolio. The increase in insurance agency revenues was due to a premium earned on a large life insurance policy and increasing revenues from our property and casualty activities which began operations in 2015.

Noninterest income for Wealth Management includes fees charged to high net-worth clients for managing their assets and for providing financial consulting services. The following table provides a breakdown of noninterest income for Wealth Management for the quarter and nine months ended September 30:

(dollars in thousands)	2016			2015
Quarter Ended September 30:
Asset management fees	$	5,301		$	5,146
Financial consulting fees		22			27
Other		(4	)		(2	)
Total noninterest income	$	5,319		$	5,171

Nine Months Ended September 30:
Asset management fees	$	15,856		$	15,360
Financial consulting fees		73			94
Other		(12	)		(28	)
Total noninterest income	$	15,917		$	15,426

Noninterest revenue for Wealth Management increased by $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2016 and $0.5 million during the first nine months of 2016 when compared to the corresponding periods in 2015 due to higher levels of AUM balances on which the asset management fees are calculated. AUM, which totaled $3.6 billion at September 30, 2016, increased by $126 million during the first nine months of 2016 as new account growth of $224 million and portfolio gains of $224 million were partially offset by net withdrawals and account terminations of $322 million.

Noninterest Expense . The following table provides a breakdown of noninterest expense for Banking and Wealth Management for the quarter and nine months ended September 30:

	Banking				Wealth Management
(dollars in thousands)	2016		2015		2016		2015
Quarter Ended September 30:
Compensation and benefits	$	8,252	$	7,084	$	3,576	$	3,508
Occupancy and depreciation		2,506		2,003		547		508
Professional services and marketing		2,797		900		421		388
Other expenses		2,579		1,666		153		281
Total noninterest expense	$	16,134	$	11,653	$	4,697	$	4,685

Nine Months Ended September 30:
Compensation and benefits	$	24,887	$	17,819	$	11,068	$	10,753
Occupancy and depreciation		7,072		4,910		1,619		1,445
Professional services and marketing		5,511		2,222		1,397		1,153
Other expenses		6,276		3,187		452		599
Total noninterest expense	$	43,746	$	28,138	$	14,536	$	13,950

The $4.5 million and $15.6 million increases in noninterest expense in Banking in the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015 were due primarily to increases in staffing and costs associated with the Bank’s expansion, the growth of its balances of loans and deposits and costs associated with our property and casualty

insurance agency operations which started during 2015. Compensation and benefits for Banking increased $1.2 million or 16% during the third quarter of 2016 as compared to the third quarter of 2015 as the number of full time equivalent employees (“FTE”) in Banking increased to 266.3 from 207.5 as a result of the increased staffing to support the growth in loans and deposits, a portion of which was offset by increased deferred c osts relating to the higher loan originations. Compensation and benefits for Banking increased $7.1 million or 40% during the first nine months of 2016 as compared to the first nine months of 2015 as the number of FTE in Banking increased to 256.2 from 180 .1 as a result of the acquisition of PRB , increased staffing to support the growth in loans and deposits and increased staffing for our property and casualty insurance agency operations . The increase s in occupancy and depreciation, professional services a nd marketing and other expenses of $3.3 million and $8.5 million for the third quarter and nine months ended of 2016 were related to higher legal costs related to ongoing litigation matters, costs associated with our expansion into additional corporate spa ce and opening of new offices, and costs related to the higher levels of loans and deposits, including FDIC insurance and customer service costs.

Noninterest expense in Wealth Management was relatively unchanged in the third quarter of 2016 as compared to the third quarter of 2015. The $0.5 million increase for the first nine months of 2016 as compared to corresponding period in 2015 was primarily due to increased compensation costs related to an increase in FTE from 55.3 for the first nine months of 2015 to 59.1 for the first nine months of 2016.

Financial Condition

The following table shows the financial position for each of our business segments, and of FFI and elimination entries used to arrive at our consolidated totals which are included in the column labeled Other and Eliminations, as of:

(dollars in thousands)	Banking		Wealth Management		Other and Eliminations			Total
September 30, 2016:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	496,725	$	1,624	$	(1,536	)	$	496,813
Securities AFS		542,703		—		—			542,703
Loans Held For Sale		200,002		—		—			200,002
Loans, net		2,295,229		—		—			2,295,229
FHLB Stock		25,677		—		—			25,677
Premises and equipment		4,546		671		125			5,342
Deferred taxes		9,495		481		180			10,156
REO		544		—		—			544
Goodwill and intangibles		2,232		—		—			2,232
Other assets		12,340		189		2,441			14,970
Total assets	$	3,589,493	$	2,965	$	1,210		$	3,593,668

Deposits	$	2,365,210	$	—	$	(26,473	)	$	2,338,737
Borrowings		951,000		—		—			951,000
Intercompany balances		2,309		162		(2,471	)		—
Other liabilities		10,761		2,356		3,520			16,637
Shareholders’ equity		260,213		447		26,634			287,294
Total liabilities and equity	$	3,589,493	$	2,965	$	1,210		$	3,593,668

December 31, 2015:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	215,671	$	5,682	$	(5,605	)	$	215,748
Securities AFS		565,135		—		—			565,135
Loans, net		1,754,883		—		—			1,754,883
FHLB Stock		21,492		—		—			21,492
Premises and equipment		1,996		545		112			2,653
Deferred taxes		14,466		630		296			15,392
REO		4,036		—		—			4,036
Goodwill and Intangibles		2,416		—		—			2,416
Other assets		8,645		314		1,865			10,824
Total assets	$	2,588,740	$	7,171	$	(3,332	)	$	2,592,579

Deposits	$	1,569,932	$	—	$	(47,756	)	$	1,522,176
Borrowings		796,000		—		—			796,000
Intercompany balances		2,748		121		(2,869	)		—
Other liabilities		9,309		2,634		2,724			14,667
Shareholders’ equity		210,751		4,416		44,569			259,736
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,588,740	$	7,171	$	(3,332	)	$	2,592,579

Our consolidated balance sheet is primarily affected by changes occurring in our Banking operations as our Wealth Management operations do not maintain significant levels of assets. Banking has experienced and is expected to continue to experience increase s in its total assets as a result of our growth strategy.

During the first n ine months of 2016 , total assets for the Company and FFB increased by $ 1.0 b illion. For FFB, during the first n ine months of 2016 , loans , including loans held for sale, and depos its increased $ 743 m illion and $ 795 million, respective ly, cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 281 million , secu rities AFS de creased by $ 22 million and FHLB advances in creased by $ 155 million.

Cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit and securities. Cash and cash equivalents, which primarily consist of funds held at the Federal Reserve Bank or at correspondent banks, including fed funds, increased $281 million during the first nine months of 2016. Changes in cash equivalents are primarily affected by the funding of loans, investments in securities, and changes in our sources of funding: deposits, FHLB advances and FFI borrowings.

Securities available for sale. The following table provides a summary of the Company’s AFS securities portfolio as of:

	Amortized		Gross Unrealized					Estimated
(dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
September 30, 2016:
US Treasury security	$	300	$	—	$	—		$	300
Agency mortgage-backed securities		489,233		9,749		(96	)		498,886
Beneficial interest – FHLMC securitization		44,505		121		(1,109	)		43,517
Total	$	534,038	$	9,870	$	(1,205	)	$	542,703

December 31, 2015:
US Treasury security	$	300	$	—	$	—		$	300
FNMA and FHLB Agency notes		16,108		—		(95	)		16,013
Agency mortgage-backed securities		538,269		909		(3,030	)		536,148
Beneficial interest – FHLMC securitization		12,674		476		(476	)		12,674
Total	$	567,351	$	1,385	$	(3,601	)	$	565,135

The US Treasury securities are pledged as collateral to the State of California to meet regulatory requirements related to FFB’s trust operations.

During the first nine months of 2016, the $33 million decrease in amortized cost of AFS securities was primarily the result of the sale of $104 million of AFS securities and the collection of $61 million in principal payments which were partially offset by the purchase of $131 million of AFS securities.

The scheduled maturities of securities AFS, other than agency mortgage-backed securities, and the related weighted average yield is as follows as of September 30, 2016:

(dollars in thousands)	Less than 1 Year			1 Through 5 years			5 Through 10 Years			After 10 Years			Total
Amortized Cost:
US Treasury securities	$	—		$	300		$	—		$	—		$	300
Weighted average yield		—	%		0.90	%		—	%		—	%		0.90	%

Estimated Fair Value:
US Treasury securities	$	—		$	300		$	—		$	—		$	300

Loans. The following table sets forth our loans, by loan category, as of:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Outstanding principal balance:
Loans secured by real estate:
Residential properties:
Multifamily	$	986,921	$	627,311
Single family		576,886		533,257
Total real estate loans secured by residential properties		1,563,807		1,160,568
Commercial properties		459,703		358,791
Land and construction		20,034		12,320
Total real estate loans		2,043,544		1,531,679
Commercial and industrial loans		228,579		196,584
Consumer loans		34,248		37,206
Total loans		2,306,371		1,765,469
Premiums, discounts and deferred fees and expenses		2,458		14
Total	$	2,308,829	$	1,765,483

The $543 million increase in loans, including loans classified as held for sale, during the first nine months of 2016 was the result of loan originations and funding of existing credit commitments of $1.3 billion, offset by $311 million of payoffs and the transfer of $469 million of loans held for sale. Loans held for sale, which totaled $200 million as of September 30, 2016, are not included in the above table.

Deposits. The following table sets forth information with respect to our deposits and the average rates paid on deposits, as of:

	September 30, 2016					December 31, 2015
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate

Demand deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	775,466		—		$	299,794		—
Interest-bearing		175,782		0.436	%		260,167		0.359	%
Money market and savings		836,494		0.697	%		492,015		0.531	%
Certificates of deposits		550,995		0.587	%		470,200		0.554	%
Total	$	2,338,737		0.420	%	$	1,522,176		0.404	%

During the first nine months of 2016 the weighted average rate of our interest-bearing deposits increased from 0.50% at December 31, 2015 to 0.63% at September 30, 2016, while the weighted average interest rates of both interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits increased from 0.40% at December 31, 2015 to 0.42% at September 30, 2016, as the increase in the proportion of noninterest-bearing deposits, which increased from $300 million at December 31, 2015 to $775 million at September 30, 2016, partially offset the impacts of the increase in rates on interest-bearing deposits. The increase in the weighted average rate of our interest-bearing deposits was the result of increases in market rates, the use of higher than market promotional rates to attract new clients and our success in attracting higher balance accounts which generally bear higher interest rates.

The growth in deposits was due primarily to the organic growth in deposits from our specialty deposit group and our branch offices.

The maturities of our Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more were as follows as of September 30, 2016:

(dollars in thousands)

3 months or less	$	149,731
Over 3 months through 6 months		45,895
Over 6 months through 12 months		70,579
Over 12 months		13,984
Total	$	280,189

FFB utilizes third party programs called CDARs and ICS which allows FFB to transfer funds of its clients in excess of the FDIC insurance limit (currently $250,000) to other institutions in exchange for an equal amount of funds from clients of these other institutions. This has allowed FFB to provide FDIC insurance coverage to its clients. Under certain regulatory guidelines, these deposits are considered brokered deposits. From time to time, the Bank will utilize brokered deposits as a source of funding. As of September 30, 2016 the Bank held $370.1 million of deposits which are classified as brokered deposits, including $109.7 million of CDARs and ICS reciprocal deposits.

Borrowings. At September 30 , 2016 and December 31, 2015 , our borrowings consisted of $951 million and $796 million, respectively, in overni ght FHLB advances. The FHLB advances were paid in full in the early parts of October, 2016 and January , 2016 , respectively. Because FFB utilizes overnight borrowings, the balance of outstanding borrowings fluctuates on a daily basis. The average balance of overnight borrowings during the first n ine months of 2016 was $ 499 million, as compared to $ 312 million during the first n ine months of 2015 . The weighted average interest rate on these overnight borrowings was 0.44 % for the first n ine months of 2016 , as compared to 0. 20 % during 2015 . The maximum amount of overnight borrowings outstanding at any month-end during the first n ine months of 2016 and 2015 w as $ 951 million and $ 660 million, respectively.

Delinquent Loans, Nonperforming Assets and Provision for Credit Losses

Loans are considered past due following the date when either interest or principal is contractually due and unpaid. Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as nonaccrual loans. Accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal and, generally, when a loan becomes contractually past due for 90 days or more with respect to principal or interest. However, the accrual of interest may be continued on a well-secured loan contractually past due 90 days or more with respect to principal or interest if the loan is in the process of collection or collection of the principal and interest is deemed probable. The following tables provide a summary of past due and nonaccrual loans as of:

	Past Due and Still Accruing												Total Past
(dollars in thousands)	30–59 Days			60-89 Days			90 Days or More			Nonaccrual			Due and Nonaccrual			Current		Total
September 30, 2016:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	4,021		$	4,021		$	1,559,786	$	1,563,807
Commercial properties		1,363			—			780			1,187			3,330			456,373		459,703
Land and construction		—			—			—			—			—			20,034		20,034
Commercial and industrial loans		4,145			5			3,136			4,184			11,470			217,109		228,579
Consumer loans		18			—			—			14			32			34,216		34,248
Total	$	5,526		$	5		$	3,916		$	9,406		$	18,853		$	2,287,518	$	2,306,371

Percentage of total loans		0.24	%		—	%		0.17	%		0.41	%		0.82	%

December 31, 2015:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,160,568	$	1,160,568
Commercial properties		1,232			—			793			1,552			3,577			355,214		358,791
Land and construction		—			—			—			—			—			12,320		12,320
Commercial and industrial loans		2,425			1,639			5,713			2,509			12,286			184,298		196,584
Consumer loans		1,010			—			1,991			75			3,076			34,130		37,206
Total	$	4,667		$	1,639		$	8,497		$	4,136		$	18,939		$	1,746,530	$	1,765,469

Percentage of total loans		0.26	%		0.09	%		0.48	%		0.23	%		1.07	%

The following table presents the composition of TDRs by accrual and nonaccrual status as of:

	September 30, 2016							December 31, 2015
(dollars in thousands)	Accrual			Nonaccrual	Total			Accrual	Nonaccrual		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	403	$	3,936	$	4,339	$	—	$	344	$	344

The following is a breakdown of our loan portfolio by the risk category of loans as of:

(dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Impaired		Total
September 30, 2016:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	1,556,117	$	3,846	$	—	$	3,844	$	1,563,807
Commercial properties		456,548		—		1,968		1,187		459,703
Land and construction		20,034		—		—		—		20,034
Commercial and industrial loans		207,574		1,913		16,439		2,653		228,579
Consumer loans		34,234		—		—		14		34,248
Total	$	2,274,507	$	5,759	$	18,407	$	7,698	$	2,306,371

December 31, 2015:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	1,159,029	$	1,539	$	—	$	—	$	1,160,568
Commercial properties		351,988		174		354		6,275		358,791
Land and construction		11,180		—		1,140		—		12,320
Commercial and industrial loans		180,755		4,977		5,165		5,687		196,584
Consumer loans		37,130		—		—		76		37,206
Total	$	1,740,082	$	6,690	$	6,659	$	12,038	$	1,765,469

We consider a loan to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, we believe that it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. We measure impairment using either the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the properties collateralizing the loan. Impairment losses are included in the ALLL through a charge to provision for loan losses. Adjustments to impairment losses due to changes in the fair value of the property collateralizing an impaired loan are considered in computing the provision for loan losses. Loans collectively reviewed for impairment include all loans except for loans which are individually reviewed based on specific criteria, such as delinquency, debt coverage, adequacy of collateral and condition of property collateralizing the loans. Impaired loans include nonaccrual loans (excluding those collectively reviewed for impairment), certain restructured loans and certain performing loans less than 90 days delinquent (“other impaired loans”) which we believe are not likely to be collected in accordance with the contractual terms of the loans.

In 2012 and in 2015, we purchased loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The carrying amount of these purchased credit impaired loans is as follows as of:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Outstanding principal balance:
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial properties	$	298		$	533
Land		—			1,616
Total real estate loans		298			2,149
Commercial and industrial loans		6,191			6,787
Consumer loans		5			14
Total loans		6,494			8,950
Unaccreted discount on purchased credit impaired loans		(1,625	)		(2,291	)
Total	$	4,869		$	6,659

Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table summarizes the activity in our ALLL for the periods indicated:

(dollars in thousands)	Beginning Balance		Provision for Loan Losses			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Ending Balance
Quarter ended September 30, 2016:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	5,353	$	951		$	—		$	—	$	6,304
Commercial properties		1,887		572			—			169		2,628
Land and construction		272		(70	)		—			—		202
Commercial and industrial loans		4,139		31			—			—		4,170
Consumer loans		549		(253	)		—			—		296
Total	$	12,200	$	1,231		$	—		$	169	$	13,600

Nine months ended September 30, 2016:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	6,799	$	(495	)	$	—		$	—	$	6,304
Commercial properties		1,813		696			(50	)		169		2,628
Land and construction		103		99			—			—		202
Commercial and industrial loans		1,649		2,521			—			—		4,170
Consumer loans		236		60			—			—		296
Total	$	10,600	$	2,881		$	(50	)	$	169	$	13,600
Year ended December 31, 2015:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	6,546	$	253		$	—		$	—	$	6,799
Commercial properties		1,499		624			(310	)		—		1,813
Land and construction		67		36			—			—		103
Commercial and industrial loans		1,897		1,665			(1,913	)		—		1,649
Consumer loans		141		95			—			—		236
Total	$	10,150	$	2,673		$	(2,223	)	$	—	$	10,600

Excluding the loans acquired in acquisitions, our ALLL represented 0.59%, and 0.61% of total loans outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

The amount of the ALLL is adjusted periodically by charges to operations (referred to in our income statement as the “provision for loan losses”) (i) to replenish the ALLL after it has been reduced due to loan write-downs or charge-offs, (ii) to reflect increases in the volume of outstanding loans, and (iii) to take account of changes in the risk of potential loan losses due to a deterioration in the condition of borrowers or in the value of property securing non–performing loans or adverse changes in economic conditions. The amounts of the provisions we make for loan losses are based on our estimate of losses in our loan portfolio. In estimating such losses, we use economic and loss migration models that are based on bank regulatory guidelines and industry standards, and our historical charge-off experience and loan delinquency rates, local and national economic conditions, a borrower’s ability to repay its borrowings, and the value of any property collateralizing the loan, as well as a number of subjective factors. However, these determinations involve judgments about changes and trends in current economic conditions and other events that can affect the ability of borrowers to meet their loan obligations to us and a weighting among the quantitative and qualitative factors we consider in determining the sufficiency of the ALLL. Moreover, the duration and anticipated effects of prevailing economic conditions or trends can be uncertain and can be affected by a number of risks and circumstances that are outside of our control. If changes in economic or market conditions or unexpected subsequent events were to occur, or if changes were made to bank regulatory guidelines or industry standards that are used to assess the sufficiency of the ALLL, it could become necessary for us to incur additional, and possibly significant, charges to increase the ALLL, which would have the effect of reducing our income.

In addition, the FDIC and the California Department of Business Oversight, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review the adequacy of our ALLL. These agencies may require us to make additional provisions for loan losses, over and above the provisions that we have already made, the effect of which would be to reduce our income.

The following table presents the balance in the ALLL and the recorded investment in loans by impairment method as of:

(dollars in thousands)	Allowance for Loan Losses								Unaccreted Credit
	Evaluated for Impairment				Purchased				Component
	Individually		Collectively		Impaired		Total		Other Loans
September 30, 2016:
Allowance for loan losses:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—	$	6,304	$	—	$	6,304	$	148
Commercial properties		—		2,628		—		2,628		149
Land and construction		—		202		—		202		3
Commercial and industrial loans		—		4,170		—		4,170		161
Consumer loans		—		296		—		296		20
Total	$	—	$	13,600	$	—	$	13,600	$	481
Loans:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	3,844	$	1,559,963	$	—	$	1,563,807	$	13,472
Commercial properties		1,187		458,334		182		459,703		24,982
Land and construction		—		20,034		—		20,034		436
Commercial and industrial loans		2,653		221,238		4,688		228,579		24,157
Consumer loans		14		34,234		—		34,248		1,477
Total	$	7,698	$	2,293,803	$	4,870	$	2,306,371	$	64,524

(dollars in thousands)	Allowance for Loan Losses								Unaccreted Credit
	Evaluated for Impairment				Purchased				Component
	Individually		Collectively		Impaired		Total		Other Loans
December 31, 2015:
Allowance for loan losses:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—	$	6,799	$	—	$	6,799	$	127
Commercial properties		30		1,783		—		1,813		363
Land and construction		—		103		—		103		42
Commercial and industrial loans		—		1,649		—		1,649		187
Consumer loans		—		236		—		236		13
Total	$	30	$	10,570	$	—	$	10,600	$	732
Loans:
Real estate loans:
Residential properties	$	—	$	1,160,568	$	—	$	1,160,568	$	7,747
Commercial properties		6,275		352,162		354		358,791		43,287
Land and construction		—		11,180		1,140		12,320		4,267
Commercial and industrial loans		5,687		185,732		5,165		196,584		28,231
Consumer loans		76		37,130		—		37,206		1,761
Total	$	12,038	$	1,746,772	$	6,659	$	1,765,469	$	85,293

The column labeled “Unaccreted Credit Component Other Loans” represents the amount of unaccreted credit component discount for loans acquired in an acquisition that were not classified as purchased credit impaired or individually evaluated for impairment as of the dates indicated, and the stated principal balances of the related loans. The unaccreted credit component discount is equal to 0.75% and 0.86% of the stated principal balances of these loans as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In addition to this unaccreted credit component discount, an additional $0.4 million and $0.3 million of the ALLL were provided for these loans as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Liquidity

Liquidity management focuses on our ability to generate, on a timely and cost-effective basis, cash sufficient to meet the funding needs of current loan demand, deposit withdrawals, principal and interest payments with respect to outstanding borrowings and to pay operating expenses. Our liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of funds management. Liquid assets are generally invested in marketable securities or held as cash at the Federal Reserve Bank, or other financial institutions.

We monitor our liquidity in accordance with guidelines established by our Board of Directors and applicable regulatory requirements. Our need for liquidity is affected by our loan activity, net changes in deposit levels and the maturities of our borrowings. The principal sources of our liquidity consist of deposits, loan interest and principal payments and prepayments, investment management and consulting fees, FHLB advances and proceeds from borrowings and sales of shares by FFI. The remaining balances of our lines of credit available to draw down totaled $431 million at September 30, 2016.

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities. During the n ine months ended September 30, 2016 , operating activities provided net cash of $ 13.7 million, comprised primarily of our net income of $ 16.8 million, and $ 5.7 million of non-cash charges, including provisions for loan losses, stock based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization and deferred income tax provision, offset partially by $8.5 gains on sales of loans and securities and a $ 1.4 million increase in other assets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, operating activities provided net cash of $7.3 million, comprised primarily of our net income of $8.3 million, and $2.9 million of non-cash charges, including provisions for loan losses, stock based compensation expense, bonus and other accruals, and depreciation and amortization, offset partially by a $2.1 million increase in other assets.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, investing activities used net cash of $708 million, primarily to fund a $1 billion net increase in loans and $131 million of securities purchases, offset partially by $270 million in cash received from the sale of loans and $165 million in cash received in proceeds from the sale, principal collection, and maturities of securities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, investing activities used net cash of $583 million, primarily to fund a $403 million net increase in loans and $225 million of securities purchases, offset partially by $38 million in cash received as a result of our acquisition of PRB.

Cash Flow Provided by Financing Activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, financing activities provided net cash of $975 million, consisting primarily of a net increase of $817 million in deposits, and a $155 million increase in FHLB advances. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, financing activities provided net cash of $752 million, consisting primarily of a net increase of $239 million in deposits, proceeds of $136 million from the sale of stock, and a $397 million increase in FHLB advances.

Ratio of Loans to Deposits. The relationship between gross loans and total deposits can provide a useful measure of a bank’s liquidity. Since repayment of loans tends to be less predictable than the maturity of investments and other liquid resources, the higher the loan-to-deposit ratio, the less liquid are our assets. On the other hand, since we realize greater yields on loans than we do on other interest-earning assets, a lower loan-to-deposit ratio can adversely affect interest income and earnings. As a result, our goal is to achieve a loan-to-deposit ratio that appropriately balances the requirements of liquidity and the need to generate a fair return on our assets. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our consolidated loan-to-deposit ratios were 107% and 116%, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The following table provides the off-balance sheet arrangements of the Company as of September 30, 2016:

(dollars in thousands)
Commitments to fund new loans	$	60,807
Commitments to fund under existing loans, lines of credit		198,443
Commitments under standby letters of credit		6,187

Some of the commitments to fund existing loans, lines of credit and letters of credit are expected to expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. As of September 30, 2016, the Bank was obligated on $129.0 million of letters of credit to the FHLB which were being used as collateral for public fund deposits, including $111.0 million of deposits from the State of California.

Capital Resources and Dividend Policy

Under federal banking regulations that apply to all United States based bank holding companies and federally insured banks, the Company (on a consolidated basis) and FFB (on a stand-alone basis) must meet specific capital adequacy requirements that, for the most part, involve quantitative measures, primarily in terms of the ratios of their capital to their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items, calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Under those regulations each bank holding company must meet a minimum capital ratio and each federally insured bank is determined by its primary federal bank regulatory agency to come within one of the following capital adequacy categories on the basis of its capital ratios: (i) well capitalized; (ii) adequately capitalized; (iii) undercapitalized; (iv) significantly undercapitalized; or (v) critically undercapitalized.

Certain qualitative assessments also are made by a banking institution’s primary federal regulatory agency that could lead the agency to determine that the banking institution should be assigned to a lower capital category than the one indicated by the quantitative measures used to assess the institution’s capital adequacy. At each successive lower capital category, a banking institution is subject to greater operating restrictions and increased regulatory supervision by its federal bank regulatory agency.

The following table sets forth the capital and capital ratios of FFI (on a consolidated basis) and FFB as of the respective dates indicated bel ow, as compared to the respective regulatory requirements applicable to them:

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
FFI
September 30, 2016
CET1 capital ratio	$	277,456		13.52	%	$	92,318		4.50	%
Tier 1 leverage ratio		277,456		9.28	%		119,589		4.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		277,456		13.52	%		123,091		6.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		291,566		14.21	%		164,121		8.00	%

December 31, 2015
CET1 capital ratio	$	256,007		17.44	%		66,072		4.50	%
Tier 1 leverage ratio		256,007		11.81	%	$	86,736		4.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		256,007		17.44	%		88,096		6.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		267,027		18.19	%		117,461		8.00	%

FFB
September 30, 2016
CET1 capital ratio	$	249,751		12.20	%	$	92,106		4.50	%	$	133,042		6.50	%
Tier 1 leverage ratio		249,751		8.37	%		119,385		4.00	%		149,232		5.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		249,751		12.20	%		122,808		6.00	%		163,744		8.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		263,861		12.89	%		163,744		8.00	%		204,680		10.00	%

December 31, 2015
CET1 capital ratio	$	206,341		14.10	%	$	65,872		4.50	%	$	95,148		6.50	%
Tier 1 leverage ratio		206,341		9.54	%		86,543		4.00	%		108,179		5.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		206,341		14.10	%		87,829		6.00	%		117,106		8.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		217,361		14.85	%		117,106		8.00	%		146,382		10.00	%

As of each of the dates set forth in the above table, the Company (on a consolidated basis) exceeded the minimum required capital ratios applicable to it and FFB (on a stand-alone basis) qualified as a well-capitalized depository institution under the capital adequacy guidelines described above.

As of September 30, 2016, the amount of capital at FFB in excess of amounts required to be Well Capitalized was $117 million for the CET-1 capital ratio, $101 million for the Tier 1 leverage ratio, $86 million for the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and $59 million for the Total risk-based capital ratio. No conditions or events have occurred since September 30, 2016 which we believe have changed FFI’s or FFB’s capital adequacy classifications from those set forth in the above table.

The “Basel III” rules adopted by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC (the “New Capital Rules”) introduced a capital conservation buffer which is an increment added to the minimum capital ratios. If a banking organization does not hold a capital conservation buffer composed of common equity tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements, it will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and executive compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. The capital buffer is measured against risk weighted assets and is therefore not applicable to the tier 1 leverage ratio. The implementation of the capital conservation buffer began on January 1, 2016 at 0.625%, and will increase by 0.625% on each subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019. The following table sets forth the minimum capital ratios plus the applicable increment of the capital conservation buffer as of the current year and when it is fully implemented in 2019:


	2016		2019
CET-1 to risk-weighted assets	5.125	%	7.000	%
Tier 1 capital (i.e., CET-1 plus Additional Tier 1) to risk-weighted assets	6.625	%	8.500	%
Total capital (i.e., Tier 1 plus Tier 2) to risk-weighted assets	8.625	%	10.500	%

During the n ine months of 2016 , and during the entirety of 2015 , FFI made cash capital c ontributions to FFB of $ 25.0 million and $ 76.5 million, respectively. As of September 30 , 2016 , FFI had $ 26.9 m illion of available capital and, therefore, has the ability and financial reso urces to contribute additional capital to FFB, if needed.

We did not pay dividends in 2016 or 2015 and we have no plans to pay dividends at least for the foreseeable future. Instead, it is our intention to retain internally generated cash flow to support our growth. Moreover, the payment of dividends is subject to certain regulatory restrictions.

We had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of September 30, 2016.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITAT IVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to certain financial risks, which are discussed in detail in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the section titled Asset and Liability Management: Interest Rate Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2016. There have been no material changes to our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk since December 31, 2015.

I TEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any system of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

In accordance with SEC rules, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness, as of September 30 2016, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2016, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

I TEM 1A .

RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in the risk factors that were disclosed in Item 1A, under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, which we filed with the SEC on March 15, 2016.

I TEM 6.

EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101		XBRL (eXtensive Business Reporting Language). The following financial materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016, formatted in XBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

*	Furnished and not filed.

S IGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

Dated: November 8, 2016	By:	/s/ JOHN M. MICHEL
		John M. Michel
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

S-1

IND EX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibits

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101		XBRL (eXtensive Business Reporting Language). The following financial materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016, formatted in XBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

*	Furnished and not filed.

E-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I Financial Information Item 1. Financial Statements Note 1: Basis Of Presentation Note 2: Acquisitions Note 3: Fair Value Measurements Note 4: Securities Note 5: Loans Note 6: Allowance For Loan Losses Note 7: Deposits Note 8: Borrowings Note 9: Earnings Per Share Note 10: Segment Reporting Item 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 4. Controls and Procedures Part II Other Information Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 6. Exhibits

FFWM 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016