FGBI 10-Q Quarterly Report June 30, 2015 | Alphaminr
First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.

FGBI 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2015

FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 form10q63015.htm FIRST GUARANTY BANK JUNE 30, 2015 FORM 10-Q form10q63015.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2015
Commission File Number 000-52748
FGB LOGO
FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Louisiana
26-0513559
(State or other jurisdiction incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
400 East Thomas Street
Hammond, Louisiana
70401
(Address of principal executive office)
(Zip Code)
(985) 345-7685
(Telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x

As of August 13 , 2015 the registrant had 6,291,332 shares of $1 par value common stock outstanding.
1

Table of Contents
Page
Part I.
Item 1.
3
3
4
5
6
7
8
Item 2.
24
Item 3.
40
Item 4.
42
Part II.
42
Item 1.
42
Item 1A.
42
Item 6.
43
Signatures
44
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks
$
16,939
$
44,365
Federal funds sold
340
210
Cash and cash equivalents
17,279
44,575
Interest-earning time deposits with banks 3,747 10,247
Investment securities:
Available for sale, at fair value
464,083
499,808
Held to maturity, at cost ( estimated fair value of $182,935 and $139,688 respectively )
185,160
141,795
Investment securities
649,243
641,603
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
1,468
1,621
Loans, net of unearned income
810,376
790,321
Less: allowance for loan losses
9,505
9,105
Net loans
800,871
781,216
Premises and equipment, net
20,181
19,211
Goodwill
1,999
1,999
Intangible assets, net
1,562
1,733
Other real estate, net
2,482
2,198
Accrued interest receivable
7,208
6,384
Other assets
6,673
8,089
Total Assets
$
1,512,713
$
1,518,876
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand
$
207,742
$
207,969
Interest-bearing demand
418,662
432,294
Savings
77,354
74,550
Time
643,540
657,026
Total deposits
1,347,298
1,371,839
Short-term borrowings
13,800
1,800
Accrued interest payable
1,997
1,997
Long-term borrowings 1,155 1,455
Other liabilities
2,711
2,202
Total Liabilities
1,366,961
1,379,293
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock:
Series C - $1,000 par value - authorized 39,435 shares; issued and outstanding 39,435 39,435 39,435
Common stock:
$1 par value - authorized 100,600,000 shares; issued 6,291,332 and 6,294,227 shares
6,291
6,294
Surplus
39,387
39,387
Treasury stock, at cost, 0 and 2,895 shares - (54 )
Retained earnings
59,275
54,280
Accumulated other comprehensive income
1,364
241
Total Shareholders' Equity
145,752
139,583
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
$
1,512,713
$
1,518,876
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands, except share data) 2015 2014 2015
2014
Interest Income:
Loans (including fees)
$ 10,391 $ 9,977
$
21,129 $
19,485
Deposits with other banks
21 49 42
81
Securities (including FHLB stock)
3,598 3,283 6,943
6,624
Total Interest Income
14,010 13,309 28,114
26,190
Interest Expense:
Demand deposits
346 332 704 683
Savings deposits
9 8 17 16
Time deposits
1,798 1,958 3,641
3,925
Borrowings
35 28 70 58
Total Interest Expense
2,188 2,326 4,432
4,682
Net Interest Income
11,822 10,983 23,682 21,508
Less: Provision for loan losses
400 357 1,010 657
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses
11,422 10,626 22,672 20,851
Noninterest Income:
Service charges, commissions and fees
682 651 1,328 1,331
ATM and debit card fees 461 429 887 821
Net gains on securities
623 56 939
209
Net gains (loss) on sale of loans
4 (6 ) 4
(7
)
Other
349 355 702 762
Total Noninterest Income
2,119 1,485 3,860
3,116
Noninterest Expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
3,859 3,953 7,905
7,784
Occupancy and equipment expense
986 1,009 1,969
2,002
Other
2,876 3,139 5,739 5,940
Total Noninterest Expense
7,721 8,101 15,613 15,726
Income Before Income Taxes
5,820 4,010 10,919 8,241
Less: Provision for income taxes
1,958 1,340 3,663 2,786
Net Income
3,862 2,670 7,256 5,455
Preferred Stock Dividends
(99 ) (99 ) (197 )
(197
)
Income Available to Common Shareholders
$ 3,763 $ 2,571
$
7,059 $
5,258
Per Common Share:
Earnings $ 0.60 $ 0.41
$
1.12 $ 0.84
Cash dividends paid $ 0.16 $ 0.16 $ 0.32 $ 0.32
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
6,291,332 6,291,332
6,291,332
6,291,332
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4

FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands) 2015 2014 2015 2014
Net Income $ 3,862 $ 2,670 $ 7,256 $ 5,455
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period (4,119 ) 6,426 2,640 13,203
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income (623 ) (56 ) (939 ) (209 )
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities (4,742 ) 6,370 1,701 12,994
Tax impact 1,612 (2,166 ) (578 ) (4,418 )
Other comprehensive income (loss) (3,130 ) 4,204 1,123 8,576
Comprehensive Income $ 732 $ 6,874 $ 8,379 $ 14,031
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5

FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (unaudited)
Series C Accumulated
Preferred Common Other
Stock Stock Treasury Retained Comprehensive
$1,000 Par $1 Par Surplus Stock Earnings Income/(Loss) Total
(in thousands, except per share data)
Balance December 31, 2013
$ 39,435 $ 6,294 $
39,387
$ (54 ) $
47,477
$
(9,134
)
$
123,405
Net income
-
-
-
-
5,455
-
5,455
Other comprehensive income
-
-
-
-
-
8,576
8,576
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.32 per share)
-
-
-
-
(2,013
)
-
(2,013
)
Preferred stock dividend
-
-
-
-
(197
)
-
(197
)
Balance June 30, 2014 (unaudited)
$ 39,435 $
6,294
$ 39,387 $ (54
)
$
50,722
$
(558
)
$
135,226
Balance December 31, 2014
$ 39,435 $
6,294
$
39,387
$ (54
)
$
54,280
$
241
$ 139,583
Net income - - - - 7,256 - 7,256
Reclassification of treasury stock under the LBCA (1) - (3 ) - 54 (51 ) - -
Other comprehensive income
-
-
-
-
-
1,123
1,123
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.32 per share)
-
-
-
-
(2,013
)
-
(2,013
)
Preferred stock dividend
-
-
-
-
(197
)
-
(197
)
Balance June 30, 2015 (unaudited)
$ 39,435 $ 6,291 $
39,387
$ -
$
59,275
$
1,364
$
145,752
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
( 1) Effective January 1, 2015, companies incorporated under Louisiana law became subject to the Louisiana Business Corporation Act (which replaced the Louisiana Business Corporation Law). Provisions of the Louisiana Business Corporation Act eliminate the concept of treasury stock and provide that shares reacquired by a company are to be treated as authorized but unissued shares. As a result of this change in law, shares previously classified as treasury stock were reclassified as a reduction to issued shares of common stock in the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2015, reducing the stated value of common stock and retained earnings.
6

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)
2015
2014
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income
$
7,256
$
5,455
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses
1,010
657
Depreciation and amortization
1,031
1,086
Amortization/Accretion of investments
1,099
983
Gain on sale/call of securities
(939
) (209 )
Gain on sale of assets (10 ) (10 )
ORE write downs and loss on disposition
137
469
FHLB stock dividends (2 ) (2 )
Net decrease in loans held for sale - 8
Change in other assets and liabilities, net
(997
)
1,133
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
8,585
9,570
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Funds invested in certificates of deposit - (7,250 )
Proceeds from maturities and calls of certificates of deposit 6,500 -
Proceeds from maturities and calls of HTM securities 8,366
5,141
Proceeds from maturities, calls and sales of AFS securities 371,267 438,922
Funds Invested in AFS securities (384,235 )
(471,466
)
Proceeds from sale/redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
1,868 1,248
Funds invested in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
(1,713 ) -
Net increase in loans
(21,160 ) (36,323 )
Purchase of premises and equipment
(1,801 )
(1,608
)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment 4 52
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
74 2,700
Net Cash (Used In) Investing Activities
(20,830
)
(68,584
)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
(24,541 )
24,982
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and short-term borrowings
12,000
(3,988
)
Proceeds from long-term borrowings - 1,555
Repayment of long-term borrowings
(300
)
(300
)
Dividends paid
(2,210
)
(2,210
)
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities
(15,051
)
20,039
Net Decrease In Cash and Cash Equivalents
(27,296
)
(38,975
)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the Beginning of the Period
44,575
61,484
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of the Period
$
17,279
$
22,509
Noncash Activities:
Loans transferred to foreclosed assets
$
495
$
672
Cash Paid During The Period:
Interest on deposits and borrowed funds
$
4,432
$
4,765
Income taxes
$
4,300
$
2,800
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements and the footnotes of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. ("First Guaranty" or the “Company”) thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and note disclosures for First Guaranty previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in First Guaranty’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary First Guaranty Bank (the "Bank"). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Those adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations at June 30, 2015 and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year or any other interim period. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term are the allowance for loan losses, valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and other purchase accounting adjustments.

Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, "Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs." The amendments in this guidance require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU.
This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. This guidance must be adopted retrospectively, wherein the balance sheet of each period presented should be adjusted to reflect the new guidance.  The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon First Guaranty’s financial statements.

8

Note 3. Securities
A summary comparison of securities by type at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is shown below.
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
Amortized Cost
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Fair Value
Available for sale:
U.S Treasuries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,000 $ - $ - $ 36,000
U.S. Government Agencies
281,825 64 (2,077 ) 279,812 295,620 30 (4,155 ) 291,495
Corporate debt securities
128,779 3,803 (1,507 ) 131,075 126,654 4,415 (1,006 ) 130,063
Mutual funds or other equity securities
1,828 2,125 - 3,953 570 4 - 574
Municipal bonds
49,461 277 (495 ) 49,243 40,599 1,077 - 41,676
Total available-for-sale securities
$ 461,893 $ 6,269 $ (4,079 ) $ 464,083 $ 499,443 $ 5,526 $ (5,161 ) $ 499,808
Held to maturity:
U.S. Government Agencies
$ 131,329 $ - $ (1,708 ) $ 129,621 $ 84,479 $ - $ (1,950 ) $ 82,529
Mortgage-backed securities 53,831 26 (543 ) 53,314 57,316 57 (214 ) 57,159
Total held to maturity securities
$ 185,160 $ 26 $ (2,251 ) $ 182,935 $ 141,795 $ 57 $ (2,164 ) $ 139,688
The scheduled maturities of securities at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to call or prepayments. Mortgage-backed securities are not due at a single maturity because of amortization and potential prepayment of the underlying mortgages. For this reason they are presented separately in the maturity table below.
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost Fair Value
Available For Sale:
Due in one year or less
$
21,333
$
21,482 $ 71,547 $ 71,665
Due after one year through five years
288,752
289,470 219,470 219,785
Due after five years through 10 years
98,643
98,401 158,076 157,531
Over 10 years
53,165
54,730 50,350 50,827
Total available-for-sale securities
$
461,893
$
464,083 $ 499,443 $ 499,808
Held to Maturity:
Due in one year or less
$
-
$
-
$ - $ -
Due after one year through five years
36,976
36,760
24,999 24,609
Due after five years through 10 years
94,353
92,861
59,480 57,920
Over 10 years
-
-
- -
Subtotal 131,329 129,621 84,479 82,529
Mortgage-backed Securities 53,831 53,314 57,316 57,159
Total held to maturity securities
$
185,160
$
182,935 $ 141,795 $ 139,688
At June 30, 2015 $508.8 million of First Guaranty's securities were pledged to secure public fund deposits and borrowings. The pledged securities had a market value of $506.6 million as of June 30, 2015.
The following is a summary of the fair value of securities with gross unrealized losses and an aging of those gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2015.
At June 30, 2015
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
(in thousands) Number of Securities
Fair Value
Gross Unrealized Losses
Number of Securities
Fair Value
Gross Unrealized Losses
Number of Securities
Fair Value
Gross Unrealized Losses
Available for sale:
U.S. Treasuries - $ - $ - - $ - $ - - $ - $ -
U.S. Government agencies
45
118,120
(825 ) 23
90,889
(1,252
) 68 209,009
(2,077
)
Corporate debt securities
84
28,961
(821 ) 30
10,118
(686
) 114
39,079
(1,507
)
Mutual funds or other equity securities
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
Municipal bonds 21 22,050 (495 ) - - - 21 22,050 (495 )
Total available-for-sale securities
150
$
169,131
$
(2,141
) 53
$
101,007
$
(1,938
) 203
$
270,138
$
(4,079
)
Held to maturity:
U.S. Government agencies
23
105,966
(1,192
) 7
23,655
(516
)
30
129,621
(1,708
)
Mortgage-backed securities 24 45,158 (543 ) - - - 24 45,158 (543 )
Total held to maturity
47
$
151,124
$
(1,735
) 7
$
23,655
$
(516
) 54
$
174,779
$
(2,251
)
9

The following is a summary of the fair value of securities with gross unrealized losses and an aging of those gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2014.
At December 31, 2014
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
(in thousands)
Number
of Securities
Fair Value
Gross Unrealized Losses
Number of Securities
Fair Value
Gross Unrealized Losses
Number of Securities
Fair Value
Gross Unrealized Losses
Available for sale:
U.S. Treasuries 4 $ 24,000 $ - - $ - $ - 4 $ 24,000 $ -
U.S. Government agencies
4
43,983
(17
) 66
232,482
(4,138
) 70
276,465
(4,155
)
Corporate debt securities
37
15,395
(238
) 50
15,397
(768
) 87
30,792
(1,006
)
Mutual funds or other equity securities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total available for sale
45
$
83,378
$
(255
) 116
$
247,879
$
(4,906
) 161
$
331,257
$
(5,161
)
Held to maturity:
U.S. Government agencies
1
$
4,993
$
(7
) 19
$
77,536
$
(1,943
) 20
$
82,529
$
(1,950
)
Mortgage-backed securities 7 12,008 (13 ) 12 29,415 (201 ) 19 41,423 (214 )
Total held to maturity
8
$
17,001
$
(20
) 31
$
106,951
$
(2,144
) 39
$
123,952
$
(2,164
)
Securities are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (iii) the recovery of contractual principal and interest and (iv) the intent and ability of First Guaranty to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
The amount of investment securities issued by U.S. Government and Government sponsored agencies with unrealized losses and the amount of unrealized losses on those investment securities are the result of changes in market interest rates. First Guaranty has the ability and intent to hold these securities in its current portfolio until recovery, which may be until maturity.
The corporate debt securities consist primarily of corporate bonds issued by financial, insurance, utility, manufacturing, industrial, consumer products and oil and gas organizations. First Guaranty believes that each of the issuers will be able to fulfill the obligations of these securities based on evaluations described above. First Guaranty has the ability and intent to hold these securities until they recover, which could be at their maturity dates.
At June 30, 2015, First Guaranty believes that the securities with unrealized losses reflect impairment that is temporary and there are no securities with other-than-temporary impairment.

At June 30, 2015, First Guaranty's exposure to bond issuers that exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity is below:
At June 30, 2015
(in thousands)
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
$
143,013
$
141,427
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac-FHLMC)
66,564
65,927
Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae-FNMA)
124,258
123,211
Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB)
133,150
132,182
Total
$
466,985
$
462,747
10

Note 4. Loans
The following table summarizes the components of First Guaranty's loan portfolio as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
(in thousands except for %)
Balance
As % of Category
Balance
As % of Category
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
54,847
6.8
%
$
52,094
6.6
%
Farmland
14,997
1.8
%
13,539
1.7
%
1- 4 Family
127,844
15.7
%
118,181
14.9
%
Multifamily
14,235
1.8
%
14,323
1.8
%
Non-farm non-residential
310,604
38.2
%
328,400
41.5
%
Total Real Estate
522,527
64.3
%
526,537
66.5
%
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
27,939
3.5
%
26,278
3.3
%
Commercial and industrial
220,379
27.1
%
196,339
24.8
%
Consumer and other
41,448
5.1
%
42,991
5.4
%
Total Non-Real Estate 289,766 35.7 % 265,608 33.5 %
Total loans before unearned income
812,293
100.0
%
792,145
100.0
%
Unearned income
(1,917
)
(1,824
)
Total loans net of unearned income
$
810,376
$
790,321
The following table summarizes fixed and floating rate loans by contractual maturity, excluding nonaccrual loans, as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 unadjusted for scheduled principal payments, prepayments, or repricing opportunities. The average life of the loan portfolio may be substantially less than the contractual terms when these adjustments are considered.
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
Fixed
Floating
Total
Fixed Floating Total
One year or less
$
94,635
$
65,980
$
160,615
$
88,686
$
72,250
$
160,936
One to five years
281,662
228,096
509,758
253,306
225,655
478,961
Five to 15 years
52,902
36,229
89,131
67,012
39,634
106,646
Over 15 years
32,901
9,159
42,060
25,304
8,104
33,408
Subtotal
$
462,100
$
339,464
801,564
$
434,308
$
345,643
779,951
Nonaccrual loans
10,729
12,194
Total loans before unearned income
812,293
792,145
Unearned income
(1,917
)
(1,824 )
Total loans net of unearned income $ 810,376 $ 790,321
As of June 30, 2015 $188.8 million of floating rate loans were at their interest rate floor. At December 31, 2014 $195.7 million of floating rate loans were at the floor rate. Nonaccrual loans have been excluded from these totals.
The following tables present the age analysis of past due loans at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
As of June 30, 2015
(in thousands)
30-89 Days Past Due
90 Days or Greater
Total Past Due
Current
Total Loans
Recorded Investment 90 Days Accruing
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
301
$
287
$
588
$
54,259
$
54,847
$
-
Farmland
-
165
165
14,832
14,997
-
1 - 4 family
2,267
5,627
7,894
119,950
127,844
374
Multifamily
-
4,325
4,325
9,910
14,235
2,987
Non-farm non-residential
3,690
1,182
4,872 305,732
310,604
-
Total Real Estate
6,258
11,586
17,844
504,683
522,527
3,361
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
-
721
721
27,218
27,939
-
Commercial and industrial
96
1,777
1,873
218,506
220,379
-
Consumer and other
90
6
96
41,352
41,448
-
Total Non-Real Estate
186
2,504
2,690
287,076
289,766
-
Total loans before unearned income
$
6,444
$
14,090
$
20,534
$
791,759
$
812,293
$
3,361
Unearned income
(1,917
)
Total loans net of unearned income
$
810,376
11

As of December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
30-89 Days Past Due
90 Days or Greater
Total Past Due
Current
Total Loans
Recorded Investment 90 Days Accruing
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
338
$
486
$
824
$
51,270
$
52,094
$
-
Farmland
10
153
163
13,376
13,539
-
1 - 4 family
2,924
4,418
7,342
110,839
118,181
599
Multifamily
2,990
-
2,990
11,333
14,323
-
Non-farm non-residential
1,509
4,993
6,502
321,898
328,400
-
Total Real Estate
7,771
10,050
17,821
508,716
526,537
599
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
-
832
832
25,446
26,278
-
Commercial and industrial
1,241
1,907
3,148
193,191
196,339
-
Consumer and other
105
4
109
42,882
42,991
-
Total Non-Real Estate 1,346 2,743 4,089 261,519 265,608 -
Total loans before unearned income
$
9,117
$
12,793
$
21,910
$
770,235
$
792,145
$
599
Unearned income
(1,824
)
Total loans net of unearned income
$
790,321
The tables above include $10.7 million and $12.2 million of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. See the tables below for more detail on nonaccrual loans.
The following is a summary of nonaccrual loans by class at the dates indicated:
in thousands)
As of June 30, 2015
As of December 31, 2014
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
287 $
486
Farmland
165
153
1 - 4 family
5,253
3,819
Multifamily
1,338 -
Non-farm non-residential
1,182
4,993
Total Real Estate
8,225
9,451
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
721
832
Commercial and industrial
1,777
1,907
Consumer and other
6
4
Total Non-Real Estate 2,504 2,743
Total Nonaccrual Loans
$
10,729 $
12,194
12


The following table identifies the credit exposure of the loan portfolio by specific credit ratings as of the dates indicated:
As of June 30, 2015
As of December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard Doubtful Total
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
49,662
$
3,357
$
1,828 $ -
$
54,847
$
46,451
$
559
$
5,084
$ - $
52,094
Farmland
14,832
19
146 -
14,997
13,299
87
153
-
13,539
1 - 4 family
114,842
5,625
7,377 -
127,844
103,582
6,113
8,486
-
118,181
Multifamily
4,047 5,863
4,325
-
14,235
3,581
6,414
4,328
-
14,323
Non-farm non-residential
280,770
12,888
16,946
-
310,604
300,319
6,788
21,293
-
328,400
Total Real Estate
464,153
27,752
30,622
- 522,527
467,232
19,961
39,344
-
526,537
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
24,866
6
3,067
-
27,939
22,789
7
3,482
-
26,278
Commercial and industrial
210,196
8,405
1,778
- 220,379
185,839
8,611
1,889
-
196,339
Consumer and other
41,163
247
38 -
41,448
42,831
123
37
-
42,991
Total Non-Real Estate 276,225 8,658 4,883 - 289,766 251,459 8,741 5,408 - 265,608
Total loans before unearned income
$
740,378
$
36,410
$
35,505 $ -
$
812 ,293 $
718,691
$
28,702
$
44,752
$ - $
792,145
Unearned income
(1,917
)
(1,824
)
Total loans net of unearned income
$
810,376
$
790,321

13

Note 5. Allowance for Loan Losses
A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses, by portfolio type, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
As of June 30,
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Beginning
Allowance (12/31/14)
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision
Ending
Allowance (6/30/15)
Beginning
Allowance (12/31/13)
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision
Ending Allowance(6/30/14)
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
702
$
(97
)
$
3 $ 281
$
889 $
1,530
$ (1,032 ) $
2
$ (59 ) $
441
Farmland
21
-
-
(15 )
6
17
-
-
3
20
1 - 4 family
2,131
(159
) 57 447 2,476
1,974
(182
)
38
(254 )
1,576
Multifamily
813
-
20 (1 )
832
376
-
28
20
424
Non-farm non-residential
2,713
(28
) 4 (320 )
2,369
3,607
(1,264
)
8
921
3,272
Total real estate
6 ,380
(284
) 84 392
6,572
7,504
(2,478
)
76
631
5,733
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
293 (336 ) 2 68
27
46
(2
)
1
(7 )
38
Commercial and industrial
1,797
(18
) 9 427
2,215
2,176
(149
)
10
(186 )
1,851
Consumer and other
371
(145
)
78
136
440
208
(157
)
102
35
188
Unallocated 264
-
- (13 ) 251 421 - - 184 605
Total Non-Real Estate 2,725
(499
) 89 618 2,933 2,851 (308 ) 113 26 2,682
Total
$
9,105
$
(783
)
$
173
$ 1,010
$
9,505
$
10,355
$
(2,786
) $ 189 $ 657 $ 8,415
Negative provisions are caused by changes in the composition and credit quality of the loan portfolio.  The result is an allocation of the loan loss reserve from one category to another.
14

A summary of the allowance and loans individually and collectively evaluated for impairment are as follows :
As of June 30, 2015
(in thousands)
Allowance
Individually
Evaluated
for Impairment
Allowance
Collectively Evaluated
for Impairment
Total Allowance for
Credit Losses
Loans
Individually Evaluated for Impairment
Loans
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
Total Loans before Unearned Income
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
222
$ 667
$
889 $ 823 $ 54,024 $ 54,847
Farmland
- 6
6
-
14,997
14,997
1 - 4 family
699 1,777
2,476
3,133 124,711
127,844
Multifamily
518
314 832 7,201 7,034 14,235
Non-farm non-residential
706
1,663
2,369
12,392
298,212 310,604
Total Real Estate
2,145
4,427 6,572
23,549
498,978 522,527
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
-
27
27
2,346
25,593
27,939
Commercial and industrial
-
2,215
2,215
1,645
218,734
220,379
Consumer and other
-
440 440
-
41,448
41,448
Unallocated - 251 251 - - -
Total Non-Real Estate - 2,933 2,933 3,991 285,775 289,766
Total
$
2,145
$ 7,360
$
9,505 $ 27,540 $ 784,753 $
812,293
Unearned Income (1,917 )
Total loans net of unearned income $ 810,376
As of December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
Allowance
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
Allowance
Collectively Evaluated
for Impairment
Total Allowance for Credit Losses
Loans
Individually Evaluated for Impairment
Loans
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
Total Loans before Unearned Income
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
126
$ 576
$
702
$
4,150
$ 47,944 $
52,094
Farmland
-
21
21
-
13,539
13,539
1 - 4 family
598
1,533
2,131
3,420
114,761
118,181
Multifamily
437
376
813
7,201
7,122
14,323
Non-farm non-residential
468
2,245
2,713
16,287
312,113
328,400
Total Real Estate
1,629
4,751
6,380
31,058
495,479
526,537
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
262
31
293
2,650
23,628
26,278
Commercial and industrial
19
1,778
1,797
1,664
194,675
196,339
Consumer and other
-
371
371
-
42,991
42,991
Unallocated - 264 264 - - -
Total Non-Real Estate 281 2,444 2,725 4,314 261,294 265,608
Total
$
1,910
$ 7,195
$
9,105
$
35,372
$ 756,773 $
792,145
Unearned Income (1,824 )
Total loans net of unearned income $ 790,321
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that First Guaranty will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due are considered in evaluating loan impairment. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.
The significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls are considered on a case-by-case basis; all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed are factors considered. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. This process is applied to impaired loan relationships in excess of $250,000.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, individual consumer and residential loans are not separately identified for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.
15

The following is a summary of impaired loans by class as of the date indicated:
As of June 30, 2015
(in thousands)
Recorded Investment
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Related Allowance
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income Recognized
Interest Income Cash Basis
Impaired Loans with no related allowance:
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$ -
Farmland
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 - 4 family
606 885
-
885
25
28
Multifamily
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-farm non-residential
3,673
4,129
-
4,128
82
83
Total Real Estate
4,279
5,014
-
5,013
107
111
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
2,346
2,681
-
2,326
70
90
Commercial and industrial
1,645
1,854
-
1,854
40
-
Consumer and other
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Non-Real Estate 3,991 4,535 - 4,180 110 90
Total Impaired Loans with no related allowance 8,270 9,549 - 9,193 217 201
Impaired Loans w ith an allowance recorded:
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
823
823
222
828
19 25
Farmland
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 - 4 family
2,527
2,551
699
2,527
65
29
Multifamily
1,338
1,338
483
1,337
40
45
Non-farm non-residential
8,719
8,719
706
8,790 219 203
Total Real Estate
13,407
13,431
2,110
13,482
343
302
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
-
-
-
-
-
-
Commercial and industrial
-
-
-
-
-
-
Consumer and other
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Non-Real Estate - - - - - -
Total Impaired Loans with an allowance recorded 13,407 13,431 2,110 13,482 343 302
Total Impaired Loans
$
21,677
$
22,980
$
2,110
$
22,675
$
560
$ 503
16

The following is a summary of impaired loans by class as of the date indicated:
As of December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
Recorded Investment
Unpaid Principal Balance
Related Allowance
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income Recognized
Interest Income Cash Basis
Impaired Loans with no related allowance:
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
3,308
$
4,359
$
-
$
3,479
$
217
$ 224
Farmland
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 - 4 family
1,368
1,656
-
397
72
43
Multifamily
-
-
-
148
31
34
Non-farm non-residential
7,439
9,008
-
8,694
422
275
Total Real Estate
12,115
15,023
-
12,718
742
576
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
-
-
-
-
-
-
Commercial and industrial
-
-
-
-
-
-
Consumer and other
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Non-Real Estate - - - - - -
Total Impaired Loans with no related allowance 12,115 15,023 - 12,718 742 576
Impaired Loans w ith an allowance recorded:
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
842
842
126
829
48
43
Farmland
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 - 4 family
2,052
2,068
598
2,062
97
87
Multifamily
1,338
1,337
398
1,340
60
55
Non-farm non-residential
8,848
8,913
468
8,948
317
327
Total Real Estate
13,080
13,160
1,590
13,179
522
512
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
2,650
2,650
262
-
-
-
Commercial and industrial
1,664
1,854
19
-
-
-
Consumer and other
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Non-Real Estate 4,314 4,504 281 - - -
Total Impaired Loans with an allowance recorded 17,394 17,664 1,871 13,179 522 512
Total Impaired Loans
$
29,509
$
32,687
$
1,871
$
25,897
$
1,264
$ 1,088
17

Troubled Debt Restructurings
A troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") is considered such if the lender for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. The modifications to First Guaranty's TDRs were concessions on the interest rate charged. The effect of the modifications to First Guaranty was a reduction in interest income. These loans have an allocated reserve in First Guaranty's allowance for loan losses. First Guaranty has not restructured any loans that are considered troubled debt restructurings in the six months ended June 30, 2015.

The following table identifies the troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
June 30, 2015 December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans Accruing Loans
(in thousands) Current 30-89 Days Past Due Nonaccrual Total TDRs Current 30-89 Days Past Due Nonaccrual Total TDRs
Real Estate:
Construction & land development $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Farmland - - - - - - - -
1-4 Family - - 1,745 1,745 - 1,752 - 1,752
Multifamily - - - - - - - -
Non-farm non residential 3,443 - 230 3,673 2,998 452 230 3,680
Total Real Estate 3,443 - 1,975 5,418 2,998 2,204 230 5,432
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural - - - - - - - -
Commercial and industrial - - - - - - - -
Consumer and other - - - - - - - -
Total Non-Real Estate - - - - - - - -
Total $ 3,443 $ - $ 1,975 $ 5,418 $ 2,998 $ 2,204 $ 230 $ 5,432
The following table discloses TDR activity for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
Troubled Debt Restructured Loans Activity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(in thousands)
Beginning balance  December 31, 2014
New TDRs
Charge-offs
post-
modification
Transferred to ORE
Paydowns
Construction to permanent financing
Restructured
to market
terms
Ending balance
June 30, 2015
Real Estate:
Construction & land development
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$ - $ - $ -
Farmland
-
-
-
-
-
- - -
1 - 4 family
1,752
-
-
-
(7
) - - 1,745
Multifamily
-
-
-
-
-
- - -
Non-farm non-residential
3,680
-
-
-
(7
) - - 3,673
Total Real Estate
5,432
-
-
(14
) - - 5,418
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
-
-
-
-
-
- - -
Commercial and industrial
-
-
-
-
-
- - -
Consumer and other
-
-
-
-
-
- - -
Total Non-Real Estate - - - - - - - -
Total Impaired Loans with no related allowance $ 5,432 $ - $ - $ - $ (14 ) $ - $ - $ 5,418
There were no commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose terms have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring at June 30, 2015.
During the previous twelve months ended June 30, 2015, one troubled debt restructured lending relationship of $1.7 million secured by one-to-four family real estate subsequently defaulted.
18

Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer amortized, but are subject to impairment testing. Other intangible assets continue to be amortized over their useful lives. First Guaranty's goodwill is the difference in purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired from its acquisition of Homestead Bancorp in 2007. Goodwill totaled $2.0 million at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. No impairment charges have been recognized on First Guaranty's intangible assets. Mortgage servicing rights were relatively unchanged totaling $0.1 million at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Other intangible assets recorded include core deposit intangibles, which are subject to amortization. The weighted-average amortization period remaining for First Guaranty's core deposit intangibles is 4.9 years at June 30, 2015. The core deposits intangible reflect the value of deposit relationships, including the beneficial rates, which arose from acquisitions.
Note 7. Other Real Estate (ORE)
Other real estate owned consists of the following at the dates indicated:
(in thousands)
June 30, 2015 December 31, 2014
Real Estate Owned Acquired by Foreclosure:
Residential $ 1,227 $ 1,121
Construction & land development 106 127
Non-farm non-residential 1,149 950
Total Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Property $ 2,482 $ 2,198
Loans secured by one-to-four family residential properties in the process of foreclosure totaled $0.5 million as of June 30, 2015 .
Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies
Off-balance sheet commitments
First Guaranty is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of the involvement in particular classes of financial instruments.
The exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The same credit policies are used in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for balance sheet instruments. Unless otherwise noted, collateral or other security is not required to support financial instruments with credit risk.
Below is a summary of the notional amounts of the financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
Contract Amount
(in thousands)
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Commitments to Extend Credit
$
83,826
$
59,675
Unfunded Commitments under lines of credit
$
112,689
$
111,247
Commercial and Standby letters of credit
$
6,954
$
7,743
Litigation
The nature of First Guaranty’s business ordinarily results in a certain amount of claims, litigation and legal and administrative cases, all of which are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. When First Guaranty determines it has defenses to the claims asserted, it defends itself. First Guaranty will consider settlement of cases when it is in the best interests of both First Guaranty and its shareholders.
While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available as of June 30, 2015, any incremental liability arising from First Guaranty’s legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on First Guaranty’s financial position.

19

Note 9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table details the changes in the single component of accumulated other comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2015:
(in thousands)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income:
Balance December 31, 2014
$ 241
Reclassification adjustments to net income:
Realized gains on securities (939 )
Provision for income taxes 319
Unrealized gains arising during the period, net of tax 1,743
Balance June 30, 2015 $ 1,364
The following table details the changes in the single component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2014:
(in thousands)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:
Balance December 31, 2013
$ (9,134 )
Reclassification adjustments to net income:
Realized gains on securities (209 )
Provision for income taxes 71
Unrealized gains arising during the period, net of tax 8,714
Balance June 30, 2014 $ (558 )
20

Note 10. Fair Value
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Valuation techniques use certain inputs to arrive at fair value. Inputs to valuation techniques are the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. They may be observable or unobservable. First Guaranty uses a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds or credit risks) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value follows, as well as the classification of such instruments within the valuation hierarchy.
Securities available for sale. Securities are classified within Level 1 where quoted market prices are available in an active market. Inputs include securities that have quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. If quoted market prices are unavailable, fair value is estimated using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, at which point the securities would be classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy. Securities classified within Level 3 in First Guaranty's portfolio as of June 30, 2015 include municipal bonds and one preferred equity security.
Impaired loans. Loans are measured for impairment using the methods permitted by ASC Topic 310. Fair value of impaired loans is measured by either the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent (Level 2 or Level 3), or the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate (Level 3). Fair value of the collateral is determined by appraisals or by independent valuation.
Other real estate owned. Properties are recorded at the balance of the loan or at estimated fair value less estimated selling costs, whichever is less, at the date acquired. Fair values of other real estate owned ("OREO") at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are determined by sales agreement or appraisal, and costs to sell are based on estimation per the terms and conditions of the sales agreement or amounts commonly used in real estate transactions. Inputs include appraisal values or recent sales activity for similar assets in the property’s market; thus OREO measured at fair value would be classified within either Level 2 or Level 3 of the hierarchy.
Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis including assets and liabilities related to reporting units measured at fair value in the testing of goodwill impairment, as well as intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.
The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
(in thousands)
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Available for Sale Securities Fair Value Measurements Using:
Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets
$
502
$
36,504
Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs
452,582
454,524
Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs
10,999
8,780
Securities available for sale measured at fair value $ 464,083 $ 499,808
First Guaranty's valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While the methodologies used are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value.

The change in Level 1 securities available for sale from December 31, 2014 was due principally to a reduction in Treasury bills of $36.0 million.
21

The following table measures financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
(in thousands)
At June 30, 2015
At December 31, 2014
Impaired Loans - Fair Value Measurements Using:
Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets
$
-
$
-
Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs
2,660
5,244
Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs
9,188
15,618
Impaired loans measured at fair value $ 11,848 $ 20,862
Other Real Estate Owned - Fair Value Measurements Using:
Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets
$
-
$
-
Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs
1,943
1,847
Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs
539
351
Other real estate owned measured at fair value $ 2,482 $ 2,198
ASC 825-10 provides First Guaranty with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The fair value option established by this statement permits First Guaranty to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each reporting date subsequent to implementation.
First Guaranty has chosen not to elect the fair value option for any items that are not already required to be measured at fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Note 11. Financial Instruments
Fair value estimates are generally subjective in nature and are dependent upon a number of significant assumptions associated with each instrument or group of similar instruments, including estimates of discount rates, risks associated with specific financial instruments, estimates of future cash flows and relevant available market information. Fair value information is intended to represent an estimate of an amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between a willing buyer and seller engaging in an exchange transaction. However, since there are no established trading markets for a significant portion of First Guaranty’s financial instruments, First Guaranty may not be able to immediately settle financial instruments; as such, the fair values are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized through immediate settlement. In addition, the majority of the financial instruments, such as loans and deposits, are held to maturity and are realized or paid according to the contractual agreement with the customer.
Quoted market prices are used to estimate fair values when available. However, due to the nature of the financial instruments, in many instances quoted market prices are not available. Accordingly, estimated fair values have been estimated based on other valuation techniques, such as discounting estimated future cash flows using a rate commensurate with the risks involved or other acceptable methods. Fair values are estimated without regard to any premium or discount that may result from concentrations of ownership of financial instruments, possible income tax ramifications or estimated transaction costs. The fair value estimates are subjective in nature and involve matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Fair values are also estimated at a specific point in time and are based on interest rates and other assumptions at that date. As events change the assumptions underlying these estimates, the fair values of financial instruments will change.
Disclosure of fair values is not required for certain items such as lease financing, investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, obligations of pension and other postretirement benefits, premises and equipment, other real estate, prepaid expenses, the value of long-term relationships with depositors (core deposit intangibles) and other customer relationships, other intangible assets and income tax assets and liabilities. Fair value estimates are presented for existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses have not been considered in the estimates. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not purport to represent and should not be considered representative of the underlying market or franchise value of First Guaranty.
Because the standard permits many alternative calculation techniques and because numerous assumptions have been used to estimate the fair values, reasonable comparison of the fair value information with other financial institutions' fair value information cannot necessarily be made. The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of financial instruments are as follows:
Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold and federal funds purchased.
These items are generally short-term and the carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets are a reasonable estimation of the fair values.
Investment Securities.
Fair values are principally based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments or the use of discounted cash flow analyses.
22


Loans Held for Sale.
Fair values of mortgage loans held for sale are based on commitments on hand from investors or prevailing market prices. These loans are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Loans, net.
Fair values are computed present values using net present value formulas. The present value is the sum of the present value of all projected cash flows on an item at a specified discount rate. The discount rate is set as an appropriate rate index, plus or minus an appropriate spread. These loans are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Accrued interest receivable.
The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.
Deposits.
The fair value of demand deposits, savings and interest-bearing demand deposits is the amount payable on demand. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Accrued interest payable.
The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
Borrowings.
The carrying amount of federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings approximate their fair values. The fair value of First Guaranty’s long-term borrowings is computed using net present value formulas. The present value is the sum of the present value of all projected cash flows on an item at a specified discount rate. The discount rate is set as an appropriate rate index, plus or minus an appropriate spread. Borrowings are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other Unrecognized Financial Instruments.
The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees charged to enter into similar legally binding agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and customers' credit ratings. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. Noninterest-bearing deposits are held at cost. The fair values of letters of credit are based on fees charged for similar agreements or on estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 the fair value of guarantees under commercial and standby letters of credit was not material.
The estimated fair values and carrying values of the financial instruments at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are presented in the following table:
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
Carrying Value
Estimated Fair Value
Carrying Value
Estimated Fair Value
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
17,279
$
17,279
$
44,575
$
44,575
Securities, available for sale
464,083
464,083
499,808
499,808
Securities, held to maturity
185,160 182,935
141,795
139,688
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
1,468
1,468
1,621
1,621
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
800,871
799,531
781,216
780,470
Accrued interest receivable
7,208 7,208
6,384
6,384
Liabilities
Deposits
$
1,347,298
$
1,348,190
$
1,371,839
$
1,373,537
Borrowings
14,955
14,955
3,255
3,255
Accrued interest payable
1,997
1,997
1,997
1,997
There is no material difference between the contract amount and the estimated fair value of off-balance sheet items that are primarily comprised of short-term unfunded loan commitments that are generally at market prices.
23

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of First Guaranty's financial condition and results of operations is intended to highlight the significant factors affecting First Guaranty's financial condition and results of operations presented in the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q. This discussion is designed to provide readers with a more comprehensive view of the operating results and financial position than would be obtained from reading the consolidated financial statements alone. Reference should be made to those statements for an understanding of the following review and analysis. The financial data at June 30, 2015 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 have been derived from unaudited consolidated financial statements and include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and provisions) necessary to present fairly First Guaranty's financial position and results of operations for such periods.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 in an effort to encourage corporations to provide information about a company's anticipated future financial performance. This act provides a safe harbor for such disclosure, which protects us from unwarranted litigation, if actual results are different from management expectations. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements and reflects management’s current views and estimates of future economic circumstances, industry conditions, company performance and financial results. The words “may,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “continue,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties, including, changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected; competition among depository and other financial institutions; inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments; adverse changes in the securities markets; changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities; our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities, if any; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans; changes in our financial condition or results of operations that reduce capital available to pay dividends; and changes in the financial condition or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own, which could cause our actual results and experience to differ from the anticipated results and expectations, expressed in such forward-looking statements.
24

Second Quarter and Six Months Ended 2015 Financial Overview
First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. is a Louisiana corporation and a bank holding company headquartered in Hammond, LA. First Guaranty Bank, the wholly-owned subsidiary of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc., is a Louisiana chartered commercial bank that provides personalized commercial banking services primarily to Louisiana customers through 21 banking facilities primary located throughout Southeast, Southwest and North Louisiana. We emphasize personal relationships and localized decision making to ensure that products and services are matched to customer needs. First Guaranty competes for business principally on the basis of personal service to customers, customer access to officers and directors and competitive interest rates and fees.
Financial highlights for the second quarter and six months period ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
Total assets were $1.5 billion at each of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Total deposits were $1.3 billion at June 30, 2015 and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2014. Total loans were $810.4 million at June 30, 2015, an increase of $20.1 million, or 2.5%, compared with December 31, 2014. Common shareholders’ equity was $106.3 million and $100.1 million at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
Net income for the second quarter of 2015 and 2014 was $3.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively.  Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $7.3 million compared to $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in net income for the 2015 periods was the result of higher loan interest income and non-interest income and lower interest expense compared to the same periods in 2014.
Net income available to common shareholders after preferred stock dividends was $3.8 million and $2.6 million for the second quarter of 2015 and 2014, respectively. Net income available to common shareholders after preferred stock dividends was $7.1 million and $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The dividends paid on preferred stock remained the same at $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.
Earnings per common share were $0.60 and $0.41 for the second quarter of 2015 and 2014, respectively and $1.12 and $0.84 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Net interest income for the second quarter of 2015 was $11.8 million compared to $11.0 million for the same period in 2014. Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $23.7 million compared to $21.5 million for the same period in 2014.
The provision for loan losses for the second quarter of 2015 and 2014 was $0.4 million. The provision for loan losses for the first six months of 2015 was $1.0 million compared to $0.7 million for the first six months of 2014.
The net interest margin for the first six months of 2015 was 3.18% which was an increase of 10 basis points from the net interest margin of 3.08% for the first six months of 2014. First Guaranty attributed the improvement in the net interest margin to the gradual shift in interest earning asset balances from securities to loans and the continued reduction in interest expense over the last year.
Investment securities totaled $649.2 million at June 30, 2015, an increase of $7.6 million when compared to $641.6 million at December 31, 2014. At June 30, 2015, available for sale securities, at fair value, totaled $464.1 million, a decrease of $35.7 million when compared to $499.8 million at December 31, 2014. At June 30, 2015, held to maturity securities, at amortized cost, totaled $185.2 million, an increase of $43.4 million when compared to $141.8 million at December 31, 2014.  The increase in investment securities was primary associated with the purchase of municipal securities and short term agency securities used to collateralize public funds.
Total loans net of unearned income were $810.4 million at June 30, 2015 compared to $790.3 million at December 31, 2014. The net loan portfolio at June 30, 2015 totaled $800.9 million, a net increase of $19.7 million from the December 31, 2014 net loan portfolio balance of $781.2 million. Total loans net of unearned income are reduced by the allowance for loan losses which totaled $9.5 million at June 30, 2015 and $9.1 million at December 31, 2014.
Total impaired loans decreased $7.8 million to $21.7 million at June 30, 2015 compared to $29.5 million at December 31, 2014.
Return on average assets for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was 1.01% and 0.74%, respectively. Return on average assets for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was 0.95% and 0.76%, respectively.  Return on average common equity for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was 14.00% and 10.98%, respectively. Return on average common equity for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was 13.43% and 11.60 %, respectively.  Return on average assets is calculated by dividing annualized net income before preferred dividends by average assets.  Return on average common equity is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by average common equity.
Book value per common share was $16.90 as of June 30, 2015 compared to $15.23 as of June 30, 2014.  Tangible book value per share was $16.35 as of June 30, 2015 compared to $14.63 as of June 30, 2014.  The increase in book value was due to the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income/loss (“AOCI”) and an increase in retained earnings. Our AOCI is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities.
First Guaranty's Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.16 per common share in the second quarter of 2015 and 2014.  First Guaranty has paid 88 consecutive quarterly dividends as of June 30, 2015.
25

Financial Condition
Changes in Financial Condition from December 31, 2014 to June 30, 2015
General .
Total assets at June 30, 2015 decreased $6.2 million or 0.4% from December 31, 2014 and to $1.5 billion at June 30, 2015.  The decrease was primarily attributed to a $27.3 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents as a result of seasonal fluctuations in public funds deposits.
Loans.
Net loans increased $19.7 million or 2.5% to $800.9 million at June 30, 2015 from $781.2 million at December 31, 2014. Net loans increased during the first six months of 2015 primarily due to a $24.0 million increase in commercial and industrial loans, a $9.7 million increase in one-to four-family residential loans, a $2.8 million increase in construction and land development loans, and a $1.7 million increase in agricultural and farmland loans.  Commercial and industrial loans increased due to an increase in local originations of small business loans. One-to-four-family residential loans increased primarily due to an increase in local loan originations and the purchase of conforming one-to four-family residential loans. Construction and land development loans increased principally due to the funding of unfunded commitments on various construction projects. Non-farm non-residential loans decreased $17.8 million primarily due to loan payoffs as of June 30, 2015.  Agricultural and farmland loans increased due to seasonal fundings on agricultural loan commitments.
As of June 30, 2015, 64.3% of our loan portfolio was secured primarily by real estate. There are no significant concentrations of credit to any individual borrower. The largest portion of our loan portfolio, at 38.2% as of June 30, 2015, was non-farm non-residential loans secured by real estate. Approximately 42% of the loan portfolio is based on a floating rate tied to the prime rate or LIBOR as of June 30, 2015. 84% of the loan portfolio is scheduled to mature within 5 years from June 30, 2015.

Net loa ns are reduced by the allowance for loan losses which totaled $9.5 million at June 30, 2015 and $9.1 million at December 31, 2014. Loan charge-offs totaled $0.8 million during the first six months of 2015 and $2.8 million during the same period in 2014. Recoveries totaled $0.2 million during the first six months of 2015 and the first six months of 2014. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on loans and Note 5 for information on the allowance for loan losses.
Investment Securities.
Investment securities at June 30, 2015 totaled $649.2 million, an increase of $7.6 million compared to $641.6 million at December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily attributed to the deployment of surplus cash into short term investment securities used to collateralize public funds deposits. The investment portfolio consisted of available-for-sale securities at fair market value for a total of $464.1 million and held-to-maturity securities at amortized cost of $185.2 million.
Our investment securities portfolio is comprised of both available-for-sale securities and securities that we intend to hold to maturity. We purchase securities for our investment portfolio to provide a source of liquidity, to provide an appropriate return on funds invested, to manage interest rate risk and to meet pledging requirements for public funds and borrowings.
The securities portfolio consists principally of U.S. Government and Government agency securities, agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt securities and municipal bonds. U.S. government agencies consist of FHLB, FFCB, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae obligations. The mortgage backed securities that we purchased were issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  The securities portfolio provides First Guaranty with a balance to credit risk when compared to other categories of assets. Management monitors the securities portfolio for both credit and interest rate risk. First Guaranty generally limits the purchase of corporate securities to individual issuers to manage concentration and credit risk. Corporate securities generally have a maturity of 10 years or less. U.S. Government securities consist of U.S. Treasury bills that have maturities of less than 30 days. Municipal securities usually have maturities of 15 years or less.  Government agency securities generally have maturities of 15 years or less.  Agency mortgage backed securities have stated final maturities of 15 to 20 years.
Our available-for-sale securities portfolio totaled $464.1 million at June 30, 2015, a decrease of $35.7 million, or 7.1%, compared to $499.8 million at December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily due to the transfer of securities classified as available-for-sale to held-to-maturity. The securities transferred to held-to-maturity were $51.8 million of government agency securities with unrealized losses of $128,000 used for the collateralization of public funds deposits. These securities have contractual maturities of five to ten years. We had an unrealized gain of $2.6 million on the conversion of a preferred security into common stock with a readily determinable fair market value during the first quarter of 2015 . The pre-tax unrealized gain was approximately $2.1 million as of June 30, 2015.  First Guaranty is liquidating the common stock during 2015 and the gains will be recognized into income as the stock is sold. During the second quarter of 2015 gains of $0.5 million were realized.
Our held-to-maturity securities portfolio had an amortized cost of $185.2 million at June 30, 2015, an increase of $43.4 million, or 30.6%, compared to $141.8 million at December 31, 2014. The increase was due to the transfer of securities classified as available-for-sale to held-to-maturity that was partially offset by early payoffs of $5.0 million of government agencies and the continued amortization of our mortgage-backed securities.
At June 30, 2015, $21.5 million or 3.3% of the securities portfolio was scheduled to mature in less than one year. $326.4 million or 50.3% of the securities portfolio is scheduled to mature between one and five years. Securities, not including mortgage backed securities, with contractual maturity dates over 10 years totaled $54.7 million or 8.4% of the total portfolio at June 30, 2015. The weighted average maturity of the securities portfolio was 4.6 years at June 30, 2015 compared to 5.3 years at December 31, 2014. The average maturity of the securities portfolio is affected by call options that may be exercised by the issuer of the securities and are influenced by market interest rates. Prepayments of mortgages that collateralize mortgage-backed securities also affect the maturity of the securities portfolio.  Based on internal forecasts as of June 30, 2015, management believes that the securities portfolio has a forecasted weighted average life of approximately 4.6 years based on the current interest rate environment.  A parallel interest rate shock of 400 basis points is forecasted to increase the weighted average life of the portfolio to approximately 5.2 years.
There was no other than temporary impairment of securities in the six months ended June 30, 2015 or June 30, 2014.
26

Nonperforming Assets .
Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans and other real-estate owned. Non-performing loans (including nonaccruing troubled debt restructurings described below) are those on which the accrual of interest has stopped or loans which are contractually 90 days past due on which interest continues to accrue. Loans are ordinarily placed on nonaccrual status when principal and interest is delinquent for 90 days or more .  However, management may elect to continue the accrual when the asset is well secured and in the process of collection. It is our policy to discontinue the accrual of interest income on any loan for which we have reasonable doubt as to the payment of interest or principal. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income is reversed. Nonaccrual loans are returned to accrual status when the financial position of the borrower indicates there is no longer any reasonable doubt as to the payment of principal or interest. Other real estate owned consists of property acquired through formal foreclosure, in-substance foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure.

The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.
(in thousands)
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Nonaccrual loans:
Real Estate:
Construction and land development
$
287
$
486
Farmland
165
153
1 - 4 family residential
5,253
3,819
Multifamily
1,338
-
Non-farm non-residential
1,182
4,993
Total Real Estate 8,225 9,451
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
721
832
Commercial and industrial
1,777
1,907
Consumer and other
6
4
Total Non-Real Estate 2,504 2,743
Total nonaccrual loans
10,729
12,194
Loans 90 days and greater delinquent & accruing:
Real Estate:
Construction and land development
-
-
Farmland
-
-
1 - 4 family residential
374
599
Multifamily
2,987
-
Non-farm non-residential
-
-
Total Real Estate 3,361 599
Non-Real Estate:
Agricultural
-
-
Commercial and industrial
-
-
Consumer and other
-
-
Total Non-Real Estate - -
Total loans 90 days and greater delinquent & accruing
3,361
599
Total non-performing loans
14,090
12,793
Real Estate Owned:
Real Estate Loans:
Construction and land development
106
127
Farmland
-
-
1 - 4 family residential
1,227
1,121
Multifamily
-
-
Non-farm non-residential
1,149
950
Total Real Estate 2,482 2,198
Non-Real Estate Loans:
Agricultural
-
-
Commercial and industrial
-
-
Consumer and other
-
-
Total Non-Real Estate
-
-
Total Real Estate Owned 2,482 2, 198
Total non-performing assets
$
16,572
$
14,991
Non-performing assets to total loans 2.05 % 1.90 %
Non-performing assets to total assets 1.10 % 0.99 %
Non-performing loans to total loans 1.74 % 1.62 %
27

At June 30, 2015, nonperforming assets totaled $16.6 million, or 1.10% of total assets, compared to $15.0 million or 0.99% of total assets at December 31, 2014, which represented an increase of $1.6 million or 10.6%. The increase in non-performing assets occurred primarily as a result of one multifamily real estate loan with a balance of $3.0 million that was 90 days past due and still accruing as of June 30, 2015. The loan is adequately secured by collateral with a personal guarantee and First Guaranty expects collection of all outstanding principal and interest. Management has not identified additional information on any loans not already included in impaired loans or the nonperforming assets that indicates possible credit problems that could cause doubt as to the ability of borrowers to comply with the loan repayment terms in the future.
At June 30, 2015 nonaccrual loans totaled $10.7 million, a decrease of $1.5 million or 12.1% compared to nonaccrual loans of $12.2 million at December 31, 2014.  One non-farm non-residential loan relationship in the amount of $2.9 million secured by a commercial property returned to accrual status in the first quarter of 2015.  A $0.9 million non-farm non-residential loan relationship secured by a commercial property returned to accrual status in the second quarter of 2015.  The decreases in non-accrual loans were partially offset by an increase in non-accrual loans associated with two lending relationships that occurred in the first quarter of 2015: (1) a loan secured by one-to-four family residential properties in the aggregate amount of $1.7 million; and (2) a loan in the amount of $1.3 million that was secured by a multi-family property.  Nonaccrual loans were concentrated in three loan relationships for a total of $4.7 million or 44.1% of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2015.
At June 30, 2015 loans 90 days or greater delinquent and still accruing totaled $3.4 million compared to $0.6 million at December 31, 2014 ; an increase of $2.8 million. The increase was associated with a multi-family loan that totaled $3.0 million and was secured by commercial real estate . As previously noted, First Guaranty believes that the loan is adequately secured and all principal and interest will be collected.

Other real estate owned at June 30, 2015 totaled $2.5 million, an increase of $0.3 million from $2.2 million at December 31, 2014. The increase in other real estate owned was due to the addition of $0.2 million in non-farm non-residential properties and $0.3 million in residential properties offset by write-downs of $0.1 million and sales of $73,000, primarily related to residential properties.

At June 30, 2015, our largest non-performing assets were comprised of the following nonaccrual loans:  (1) a lending relationship secured with three one-to-four family residential loans that in aggregate total $1.7 million; (2) a commercial and industrial loan with a balance of $1.6 million secured by equipment, which has a USDA government guarantee for $1.3 million; and (3) a multi-family loan with a balance of $1.3 million secured by a commercial property.
Troubled Debt Restructurings .
Another category of assets which contribute to our credit risk is troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). A TDR is a loan for which a concession has been granted to the borrower due to a deterioration of the borrower’s financial condition. Such concessions may include reduction in interest rates, deferral of interest or principal payments, principal forgiveness and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral. We strive to identify borrowers in financial difficulty early and work with them to modify to more affordable terms before such loan reaches nonaccrual status. In evaluating whether to restructure a loan, management analyzes the long-term financial condition of the borrower, including guarantor and collateral support, to determine whether the proposed concessions will increase the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest. TDRs that are not performing in accordance with their restructured terms and are either contractually 90 days past due or placed on nonaccrual status are reported as non-performing loans. Our policy provides that nonaccrual TDRs are returned to accrual status after a period of satisfactory and reasonable future payment performance under the terms of the restructuring. Satisfactory payment performance is generally no less than six consecutive months of timely payments and demonstrated ability to continue to repay.
The following is a summary of loans restructured as TDRs at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
(in thousands) June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Restructured Loans:
In Compliance with Modified Terms
$
3,443
$
2,998
Past Due 30 through 89 days and still accruing - 2,204
Past Due 90 days and greater and still accruing - -
Restructured Loans that subsequently defaulted 1,975 230
Total Restructured Loans $ 5,418 $ 5,432
At June 30, 2015, we had four outstanding TDRs: (1) a $2.9 million non-farm non-residential loan secured by commercial real estate, which is performing in accordance with its modified terms; (2) a $0.5 million non-farm non-residential loan secured by commercial real estate, which is performing in accordance with its modified terms; (3) a $1.7 million lending relationship with three individual loans secured by one-to-four family residential properties that subsequently defaulted and is on nonaccrual; and (4) a $0.2 million loan secured by commercial real estate that subsequently defaulted and is on nonaccrual.  The restructuring of these loans was related to interest rate or amortization concessions.
28

Allowance for Loan Losses.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained to absorb potential losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, offset by recoveries of previously charged-off loans and is decreased by loan charge-offs. The provision is a charge to current expense to provide for current loan losses and to maintain the allowance commensurate with management’s evaluation of the risks inherent in the loan portfolio. Various factors are taken into consideration when determining the amount of the provision and the adequacy of the allowance. These factors include but are not limited to:
past due and non-performing assets;
specific internal analysis of loans requiring special attention;
the current level of regulatory classified and criticized assets and the associated risk factors with each;
changes in underwriting standards or lending procedures and policies;
charge-off and recovery practices;
national and local economic and business conditions;
nature and volume of loans;
overall portfolio quality;
adequacy of loan collateral;
quality of loan review system and degree of oversight by our board of directors;
competition and legal and regulatory requirements on borrowers;
examinations of the loan portfolio by federal and state regulatory agencies and examinations; and
review by our internal loan review department and independent accountants.
The data collected from all sources in determining the adequacy of the allowance is evaluated on a regular basis by management with regard to current national and local economic trends, prior loss history, underlying collateral values, credit concentrations and industry risks. An estimate of potential loss on specific loans is developed in conjunction with an overall risk evaluation of the total loan portfolio. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as new information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general, and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as doubtful, substandard, and impaired. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. Also, a specific reserve is allocated for our syndicated loans, including shared national credits. The general component covers non-classified loans and special mention loans and is based on historical loss experience for the past three years adjusted for qualitative factors described above. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect the estimate of probable losses.
The balance in the allowance for loan losses is principally influenced by the provision for loan losses and by net loan loss experience.  Additions to the allowance are charged to the provision for loan losses.  Losses are charged to the allowance as incurred and recoveries on losses previously charged to the allowance are credited to the allowance at the time recovery is collected.
The allowance for losses was $9.5 million or 1.17% of total loans and 67.5% of nonperforming loans at June 30, 2015, up from $9.1 million at December 31, 2014.

Comparing June 30, 2015 to December 31, 2014, the increase in allowance was attributed to growth in the loan portfolio. The increase in 90 day past due loans was related to one credit relationship in the amount of $3.0 million. First Guaranty anticipates that the borrower will return to performing status.  There was general improvement in the credit quality of the loan portfolio and the impaired loan portfolio did not suffer additional declines in estimated fair value. The credit quality improvements were across most loan portfolio types with the largest improvement in non-farm non-residential loans, commercial and industrial loans, and construction and land development loans. Special mention credits increased principally due to several impaired loans receiving upgraded risk status to special mention from impaired.
First Guaranty charged off $0.8 million in loan balances during the first six months of 2015.  The charged-off loan balances were concentrated in one loan relationship which totaled $0.3 million or 42.8% of the total charged off amount.  The details of the $0.8 million in charged off loans were as follows:
1.
First Guaranty charged off a $0.3 million agricultural loan.
2. $0.5 million of charge-offs for the first six months of 2015 were comprised of smaller loans and overdrawn deposit accounts.
Provisions totaled $1.0 million in the first six months of 2015 as compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2014. The provisions made in the first six months of 2015 were taken to provide for current loan losses and to maintain the allowance proportionate to risks inherent in the loan portfolio. Total charge-offs were $0.8 million for first six months of 2015 as compared to $2.8 million for the same period in 2014.  First Guaranty attributed the decline in charged-off loans from the first six months of 2014 to the first six months of 2015 to a general improvement in the credit quality of the loan portfolio and to the fact that charge-offs in the first six months of 2014 were concentrated in two loan relationships that had specific reserves from prior periods.  Recoveries totaled $0.2 million during the first six months of 2015 and during the first six months of 2014. For more information, see Note 5 to Consolidated Financial Statements.
29


Other information related to the allowance for loan losses are as follows:
(in thousands)
June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014
Loans:
Average outstanding balance
$
796,063
$
711,915
Balance at end of period
$
810,376
$
736,220
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance at beginning of year
$
9,105
$
10,355
Charge-offs
(783
)
(2,786
)
Recoveries
173
189
Provision 1,010 657
Balance at end of period
$
9,505
$
8,415
30

Deposits .
Managing the mix and pricing the maturities of deposit liabilities is an important factor affecting our ability to maximize our net interest margin. The strategies used to manage interest-bearing deposit liabilities are designed to adjust as the interest rate environment changes. We regularly assess our funding needs, deposit pricing and interest rate outlooks. From December 31, 2014 to June 30, 2015, total deposits decreased $24.5 million, or 1.8%, to $1.3 billion. Time deposits decreased $13.5 million, or 2.1%, to $643.5 million at June 30, 2015 compared to $657.0 million at December 31, 2014. Interest-bearing demand deposits decreased $13.6 million from December 31, 2014 to June 30, 2015 . At June 30, 2015, we had $25.7 million in brokered deposits.

As we seek to strengthen our net interest margin and improve our earnings, attracting core noninterest-bearing deposits will be a primary emphasis. Management will continue to evaluate and update our product mix in its efforts to attract additional core customers. We currently offer a number of noninterest-bearing deposit products that are competitively priced and designed to attract and retain customers with primary emphasis on core deposits.

As of June 30, 2015 , the aggregate amount of outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or equal to $250,000 was approximately $326.9 million . At June 30, 2015, approximately $235.9 million of First Guaranty's certificates of deposit had a remaining term greater than one year.
The following table compares deposit categories for the periods indicated.

Total Deposits
For the Six Months Ended June 30, For the Years Ended December, 31
2015
2014
2013
(in thousands except for %)
Average Balance
Percent
Weighted Average Rate
Average Balance
Percent
Weighted Average Rate
Average Balance
Percent
Weighted Average Rate
Noninterest-bearing Demand
$
210,613
15.3
%
0.0
%
$
200,127
15.3
%
0.0
%
$
196,589
15.8
%
0.0
%
Interest-bearing Demand
431,446
31.3
%
0.3
%
386,363
29.6
%
0.3
%
334,573
26.8
%
0.4
%
Savings
75,805
5.5
%
0.0
%
69,719
5.4
%
0.0
%
64,639
5.2
%
0.1
%
Time
659,964
47.9
%
1.1
%
649,165
49.7
%
1.2
%
650,540
52.2
%
1.5
%
Total Deposits
$
1,377,828
100.0
%
0.6
%
$
1,305,374
100.0
%
0.8
%
$
1,246,341
100.0
%
0.9
%
Individual and Business Deposits
For the Six Months Ended June 30, For the Years Ended December, 31
2015
2014
2013
(in thousands except for %)
Average Balance
Percent
Weighted Average Rate
Average Balance
Percent
Weighted Average Rate
Average Balance
Percent
Weighted Average Rate
Noninterest-bearing Demand
$
205,866
26.9
%
0.0
%
$
197,332
25.3
%
0.0
%
$
193,773
24.6
%
0.0
%
Interest-bearing Demand
113,848
14.9
%
0.2
%
105,569
13.5
%
0.2
%
85,384
10.9
%
0.3
%
Savings
65,089
8.5
%
0.1
%
61,288
7.9
%
0.0
%
57,819
7.3
%
0.1
%
Time
379,615
49.7
%
1.4
%
414,975
53.3
%
1.4
%
450,178
57.2
%
1.8
%
Total Deposits
$
764,418
100.0
%
0.7
%
$
779,164
100.0
%
0.8
%
$
787,154
100.0
%
1.1
%

Public Fund Deposits
For the Six Months Ended June 30, For the Years Ended December, 31
2015
2014
2013
(in thousands except for %)
Average Balance
Percent
Weighted Average Rate
Average Balance
Percent
Weighted Average Rate
Average Balance
Percent
Weighted Average Rate
Noninterest-bearing Demand
$
4,747
0.8
%
0.0
%
$
2,795
0.5
%
0.0
%
$
2,816
0.6
%
0.0
%
Interest-bearing Demand
317,598
51.8
%
0.4
%
280,794
53.4
%
0.4
%
249,189
54.3
%
0.4
%
Savings
10,716
1.7
%
0.0
%
8,431
1.6
%
0.0
%
6,820
1.5
%
0.1
%
Time
280,349
45.7
%
0.7
%
234,190
44.5
%
0.7
%
200,362
43.6
%
0.8
%
Total Deposits
$
613,410
100.0
%
0.5
%
$
526,210
100.0
%
0.5
%
$
459,187
100.0
%
0.6
%
The following table sets forth the distribution of our time deposit accounts.
( in thousands)
June 30, 2015
Time deposits of less than $100,000 $ 177,236
Time deposits of $100,000 through $250,000 139,381
Time deposits of more than $250,000 326,923
Total Time Deposits $ 643,540

31


At June 30, 2015, public funds deposits totaled $599.9 million compared to $601.5 million at December 31, 2014. Public fund time deposits totaled $276.0 million at June 30, 2015 compared to $266.7 million at December 31, 2014. We have developed a program for the retention and management of public funds deposits. Since 2012, we have maintained public funds deposits in excess of $400.0 million. These deposits are from local government entities such as school districts, hospital districts, sheriff departments and other municipalities. $480.2 million , or 80%, of these accounts at June 30, 2015, are under contracts with terms of three years or less. Three of these relationships account for 41 % of our total public funds deposits, each of which is currently under contract with us. These deposits generally have stable balances as we maintain both operating accounts and time deposits for these entities.  There is a seasonal component to public deposit levels associated with annual tax collections.  Public funds will increase at the end of the year and during the first quarter. Public funds generally decline in the second and third quarters. Public funds deposit accounts are collateralized by FHLB letters of credit, by Louisiana municipal bonds and by eligible government and government agency securities such as those issued by the FHLB, FFCB, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac.  We invest the majority of these public deposits in our investment portfolio.
The following table sets forth public funds as a percent of total deposits .
(in thousands except for %)
June 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011
Public Funds:
Noninterest-bearing Demand
$ 4,343 $ 3,241 $ 3,016 $ 3,735 $ 2,552
Interest-bearing Demand 308,009 321,382 296,739 265,296 208,230
Savings 11,498 10,142 7,209 6,415 3,918
Time 276,028 266,743 208,614 195,052 217,205
Total Public Funds $ 599,878 $ 601,508 $ 515,578 $ 470,498 $ 431,905
Total Deposits $ 1,347,298 $ 1,371,839 $ 1,303,099 $ 1,252,612 $ 1,207,302
Total Public Funds as a percent of Total Deposits 44.5 % 43.9 % 39.6 % 37.6 % 35.8 %
32

Borrowings .
First Guaranty maintains borrowing relationships with other financial institutions as well as the Federal Home Loan Bank on a short and long-term basis to meet liquidity needs. At June 30, 2015 , short-term borrowings totaled $13.8 million compared to $1.8 million at December 31, 2014. Short-term borrowings consisted of a line of credit totaling $1.8 million and collateralized short-term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $12.0 million.  First Guaranty had long-term borrowings totaling $1.2 million as of June 30, 2015 and $1.5 million at December 31, 2014.
At June 30, 2015, First Guaranty had $170.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank letters of credit outstanding obtained solely for collateralizing public deposits.
Total Shareholders' Equity.
Total shareholders' equity increased to $145.8 million at June 30, 2015 from $139.6 million at December 31, 2014. The increase in shareholders' equity was principally the result of an increase in retained earnings of $5.0 million and a $1.1 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income.  The market value of First Guaranty's securities portfolio increased primarily due to the unrealized gain on conversion of a preferred security into common stock with a readily determinable fair market value during the six months ended June 30, 2015. The $5.0 million increase in retained earnings was due to net income of $7.3 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2015, partially offset by $2.0 million in cash dividends paid on our common stock and $0.2 million in dividends paid on our preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with our participation in the SBLF.

Results of Operations for the Second Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
Performance Summary
Three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $3.9 million, an increase of $1.2 million, or 44.6%, from $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $3.8 million which was an increase of $1.2 million from $2.6 million for the same period in 2014. The increase in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily the result of increased loan interest income, increased noninterest income, and lower interest expense. Earnings per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $0.60 per common share, an increase of 46.3% or $0.19 per common share from $0.41 per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2014.
Six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $7.3 million, an increase of $1.8 million, or 33.0%, from $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Net income available to common shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $7.1 million which was an increase of $1.8 million from $5.3 million for the same period in 2014. The increase in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily the result of increased loan interest income, increased noninterest income, and lower interest expense. Earnings per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $1.12 per common share, an increase of 33.3% or $0.28 per common share from $0.84 per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Net I nterest Income
Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets, including loans and securities, and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and other borrowed funds. Interest rate fluctuations, as well as changes in the amount and type of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, combine to affect net interest income. Our net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It is also affected by changes in yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds.
A financial institution’s asset and liability structure is substantially different from that of a non-financial company, in that virtually all assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Accordingly, changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on a financial institution’s performance. The impact of interest rate changes depends on the sensitivity to the change of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The effects of the low interest rate environment in recent years and our interest sensitivity position is discussed below.
Three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $11.8 million and $11.0 million, respectively. The increase in net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily due to the increase in the average balance of our total interest-earning assets and a decrease in the average rate of our total interest-bearing liabilities. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the average balance of our total interest-earning assets increased by $89.5 million to $1.5 billion, which was partially offset by the decrease in the average yield of interest-earning assets by four basis points to 3.75% from 3.79% for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The average rate of our total interest-bearing liabilities decreased by eight basis points to 0.76% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 0.84% for the three months ended June 30, 2014, which was partially offset by the increase in the average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities by $50.3 million to $1.2 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2015. As a result, our net interest rate spread increased four basis points to 2.99% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from 2.95% for the three months ended June 30, 2014, and our net interest margin also increased three basis points to 3.16% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from 3.13% for the three months ended June 30, 2014.
Six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $23.7 million and $21.5 million, respectively. The increase in net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily due to the increase in the average balance of our total interest-earning assets, an increase in the average yield of interest earning assets and a decrease in the average rate of our total interest-bearing liabilities. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the average balance of our total interest-earning assets increased by $92.7 million to $1.5 billion, and the average yield of interest-earning assets increased by three basis points to 3.78% from 3.75% for the six months ended June 30, 2014.  The average rate of our total interest-bearing liabilities decreased by nine basis points to 0.76% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 0.85% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, which was partially offset by the increase in the average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities by $55.2 million to $1.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015. As a result, our net interest rate spread increased twelve basis points to 3.02% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 2.90% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and our net interest margin also increased ten basis points to 3.18% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 3.08% for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
33

Interest Income
Three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. Interest income increased $0.7 million, or 5.3%, to $14.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Interest income on loans increased $0.4 million and interest income on securities increased $0.3 million. The increase in interest income resulted primarily from an $89.5 million increase in the average balance of our interest-earnings assets to $1.5 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2015. This was partially offset by a decrease in the average yield of interest-earning assets by four basis points to 3.75% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 3.79% for the three months ended June 30, 2014.
Interest income on loans increased $0.4 million, or 4.1%, to $10.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as a result of an increase in the average balance of loans, partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on loans. The average balance of loans increased by $75.0 million to $795.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from $720.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as a result of new loan originations, the majority of which were one-to-four family residential loans, a purchased pool of performing commercial leases, and commercial and industrial loans.  Partially offsetting the increase in the average balance of loans was a decrease in the average yield on loans, which decreased by 32 basis points to 5.24% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from 5.56% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 due to pay-offs of higher-yielding existing loans in the current low interest rate environment.
In terest income on securities increased $0.3 million, or 9.6%, to $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in the average balance of securities. The average balance of securities increased $56.2 million to $672.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from $615.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 due to an increase in the average balance of our municipal securities and short-term agency securities.  The average yield on securities increased by one basis point to 2.15% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from 2.14% for the three months ended June 30, 2014.
Six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. Interest income increased $1.9 million, or 7.3%, to $28.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 primarily as a result of a $1.6 million increase in interest income on loans. The increase in interest income resulted primarily from a $92.7 million increase in the average balance of our interest-earnings assets to $1.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The average yield of interest-earning assets increased by three basis points to 3.78% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 3.75% for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Interest income on loans increased $1.6 million, or 8.4%, to $21.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as a result of an increase in the average balance of loans, partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on loans. The average balance of loans (excluding loans held for sale) increased by $84.1 million to $796.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $711.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as a result of new loan originations, the majority of which were one-to-four family residential loans, a purchased pool of performing commercial leases and commercial and industrial loans. First Guaranty's syndicated loan portfolio balances stayed relatively constant from the six months ended June 30, 2014 to the six months ended June 30, 2015.  First Guaranty attributes most of the growth in commercial and industrial loans to our business strategy to grow small business loans. Partially offsetting the increase in the average balance of loans was a decrease in the average yield on loans, which decreased by 17 basis points to 5.35% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 5.52% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 due to pay-offs of higher-yielding existing loans in the current low interest rate environment.
In terest income on securities increased $0.3 million, or 4.8%, to $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in the average balance of securities. The average balance of securities increased $42.4 million to $672.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $629.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 due to an increase in the average balance of our municipal securities and short-term agency securities. The average yield on securities decreased by four basis points to 2.08% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 2.12% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 due to payoffs of higher yielding securities, which were primarily reinvested in shorter duration lower yielding securities.
34

Interest Expense
Three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. Interest expense decreased $0.1 million, or 5.9%, to $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 due to a decrease in the average rate on time deposits. The average rate of time deposits decreased by 11 basis points during the three months ended June 30, 2015 to 1.10%, reflecting downward repricing of our time deposits in the continued low interest rate environment. The average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased by $48.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2015 to $1.2 billion as a result of a $41.4 million increase in the average balance of interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits along with a $7.4 million increase in the average balance of time deposits.
Six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. Interest expense decreased $0.3 million, or 5.3%, to $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 due to a decrease in the average rate on time deposits.  The average rate of time deposits decreased by 12 basis points during the six months ended June 30, 2015 to 1.11%, reflecting downward repricing of our time deposits in the continued low interest rate environment. The average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased by $58.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 to $1.2 billion as a result of a $41.7 million increase in the average balance of interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits along with a $17.1 million increase in the average balance of time deposits.
The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments were made, as the effect thereof was not material. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, but have been reflected in the tables as loans carrying a zero yield. Loans, net of unearned income, include loans held for sale. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.
The net interest income yield shown below in the average balance sheet is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest-earning assets and is a measure of the efficiency of the earnings from balance sheet activities. It is affected by changes in the difference between interest on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the percentage of interest-earning assets funded by interest-bearing liabilities.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
( in thousands except for %)
Average Balance Interest Yield/Rate (5) Average Balance Interest Yield/Rate (5)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits with banks
$
30,805
$
21 0.27
%
$
72,556
$
49
0.27
%
Securities (including FHLB stock)
672,093 3,598 2.15
%
615,903
3,283 2.14
%
Federal funds sold
364
-
-
%
282
-
-
%
Loans held for sale - - - % - - - %
Loans, net of unearned income
794,999 10,391 5.24
%
719,992
9,977
5.56
%
Total interest-earning assets
1,498,261
$
14,010 3.75
%
1,408,733
$
13,309
3.79
%
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks
5,044
9,325
Premises and equipment, net
19,869
19,535
Other assets
5,723
7,307
Total Assets
$
1,528,897
$
1,444,900
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
$
422,407
$
346 0.33
%
$
389,446
$
332
0.34
%
Savings deposits
76,563 9 0.05
%
68,102
8 0.05
%
Time deposits
654,863 1,798 1.10
%
647,457
1,958
1.21
%
Borrowings
6,065 35 2.31
%
4,547
28
2.47
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
1,159,898
$
2,188 0.76
%
1,109,552
$
2,326
0.84
%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
215,467
197,169
Other
6,316
4,817
Total Liabilities
1,381,681
1,311,538
Shareholders' equity
147,216
133,362
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
$
1,528,897
$
1,444,900
Net interest income
$
11,822
$
10,983
Net interest rate spread (1)
2.99
%
2.95
%
Net interest-earning assets (2)
$
338,363
$
299,181
Net interest margin (3), (4)
3.16
%
3.13
%
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
129.17
%
126.96
%
(1) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.
(2) Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
(3) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
(4) The tax adjusted net interest margin was 3.20% and 3.15% for the above periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 respectively. A 35% tax rate was used to calculate the effect on securities income from tax exempt securities.
(5) Annualized.
35

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
( in thousands except for %)
Average Balance Interest Yield/Rate (5) Average Balance Interest Yield/Rate (5)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits with banks
$
33,510
$
42 0.25
%
$
67,283
$
81
0.24
%
Securities (including FHLB stock)
671,957 6,943 2.08
%
629,591
6,624 2.12
%
Federal funds sold
301
-
-
%
334
-
-
%
Loans, net of unearned income
796,063 21,129 5.35
%
711,915
19,485
5.52
%
Total interest-earning assets
1,501,831
$
28,114 3.78
%
1,409,123
$
26,190
3.75
%
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks
6,816
9,471
Premises and equipment, net
19,575
19,542
Other assets
5,921
8,278
Total Assets
$
1,534,143
$
1,446,414
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
$
431,446
$
704 0.33
%
$
397,409
$
683
0.35
%
Savings deposits
75,805 17 0.05
%
68,109
16 0.05
%
Time deposits
659,964 3,641 1.11
%
642,832
3,925
1.23
%
Borrowings
5,119 70 2.74
%
8,767
58
1.34
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
1,172,334
$
4,432 0.76
%
1,117,117
$
4,682
0.85
%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
210,613
193,886
Other
5,763
4,595
Total Liabilities
1,388,710
1,315,598
Shareholders' equity
145,433
130,816
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
$
1,534,143
$
1,446,414
Net interest income
$
23,682
$
21,508
Net interest rate spread (1)
3.02
%
2.90
%
Net interest-earning assets (2)
$
329,497
$
292,006
Net interest margin (3), (4)
3.18
%
3.08
%
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
128.11
%
126.14
%
(1) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.
(2) Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
(3) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
(4) The tax adjusted net interest margin was 3.21% and 3.10% for the above periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 respectively. A 35% tax rate was used to calculate the effect on securities income from tax exempt securities.
(5) Annualized.
36

Provision for Loan Losses.
A provision for loan losses is a charge to income in an amount that management believes is necessary to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. The provision is based on management’s regular evaluation of current economic conditions in our specific markets as well as regionally and nationally, changes in the character and size of the loan portfolio, underlying collateral values securing loans, and other factors which deserve recognition in estimating loan losses. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or as future events change.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the provision for loan losses was $0.4 million compared to $0.4 million for the same period in 2014.  The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2015 was $9.5 million and was 1.17% of total loans.  The increase in the provision was principally due to growth in loans.
We recorded a $1.0 million provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2014. The increase in the provision was principally due to growth in loans.
We believe that the allowance is adequate to cover potential losses in the loan portfolio given the current economic conditions, and current expected net charge-offs and non-performing asset levels.
Noninterest Income.
Our primary sources of recurring noninterest income are customer service fees, loan fees, gains on the sales of loans and available-for-sale securities and other service fees. Noninterest income does not include loan origination fees which are recognized over the life of the related loan as an adjustment to yield using the interest method.
Noninterest income totaled $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $0.6 million from $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014.  The majority of the increase was due to higher gains on securities sales.  Net securities gains were $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to $0.1 million for the same period in 2014. The gains on securities sales occurred as First Guaranty sold investment securities in order to fund loan growth and as First Guaranty liquidated its shares in a preferred security that converted to common stock in the first quarter of 2015.  Service charges, commissions and fees totaled $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.  ATM and debit card fees totaled $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to $0.4 million for the same period in 2014. Other noninterest income totaled $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and $0.4 million for the same period in 2014.
Noninterest income totaled $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $0.7 million from $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The majority of the increase was due to higher gains on securities sales. Net securities gains were $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to $0.2 million for the same period in 2014. The gains on securities sales occurred as First Guaranty sold investment securities in order to fund loan growth and as First Guaranty liquidated its shares in a preferred security that converted to common stock in the first quarter of 2015. Service charges, commissions and fees totaled $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014. ATM and debit card fees totaled $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $0.8 million for the same period in 2014. Other noninterest income totaled $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
37

Noninterest Expense.
Noninterest expense includes salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment expense and other types of expenses.  Noninterest expense totaled $7.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and $8.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Salaries and benefits expense totaled $3.9 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. Occupancy and equipment expense totaled $1.0 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. Other noninterest expense totaled $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, a decrease of $0.3 million when compared to $3.1 million for the same period in 2014. The largest drop in non-interest expense occurred due to lower costs associated with other real estate owned.
Noninterest expense totaled $15.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $15.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.  Salaries and benefits expense increased $0.1 million to $7.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $7.8 million for the same period in 2014. Occupancy and equipment expense totaled $2.0 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.  Other noninterest expense totaled $5.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, a decrease of $0.2 million when compared to $5.9 million for the same period in 2014. The largest drop in non-interest expense occurred due to lower costs associated with other real estate owned.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of other noninterest expense:

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands) 2015 2014
2015
2014
Other noninterest expense:
Legal and professional fees
$ 459 $ 420
$
790
$
876
Data processing
284 273 616
548
Marketing and public relations
202 165
369
341
Taxes - sales, capital, and franchise
194 174 365
346
Operating supplies
109 91
202
192
Travel and lodging
214 163 410
297
Telephone 48 62 95 124
Amortization of core deposits 80 80 160 160
Donations 75 75 170 150
Net costs from other real estate and repossessions
148 330 291 514
Regulatory assessment 271 251 540 612
Other
792 1,055
1,731
1,780
Total other noninterest expense
$ 2,876 $ 3,139
$
5,739
$
5,940
Income Taxes.
The amount of income tax expense is influenced by the amount of pre-tax income, the amount of tax-exempt income and the amount of other non-deductible expenses.  The provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $2.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively.  The provision for income taxes increased due to the increase in income before taxes. First Guaranty’s statutory tax rate was 35.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2015, which was unchanged from the second quarter of 2014.
The provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $3.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively. The provision for income taxes increased due to the increase in income before taxes. Our statutory tax rate was 35.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014.
38

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity .
Liquidity refers to the ability or flexibility to manage future cash flows to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers and fund operations. Maintaining appropriate levels of liquidity allows us to have sufficient funds available to meet customer demand for loans, withdrawal of deposit balances and maturities of deposits and other liabilities. Liquid assets include cash and due from banks, interest-earning demand deposits with banks, federal funds sold and available for sale investment securities.

Loans maturing within one year or less at June 30, 2015 totaled $160.6 million. At June 30, 2015, time deposits maturing within one year or less totaled $407.6 million. First Guaranty’s held-to-maturity ("HTM") portfolio at June 30, 2015 was $185.2 million or 28.5% of the investment portfolio compared to $141.8 million or 22.1% at December 31, 2014. The securities in the held-to-maturity portfolio are used to collateralize public funds deposits and may also be used to secure borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank or Federal Reserve Bank. The agency securities in the HTM portfolio have maturities of 10 years or less. The mortgage backed securities have stated final maturities of 15 to 20 years at June 30, 2015. The HTM portfolio had a forecasted weighted average life of approximately 5.0 years based on current interest rates. Management regularly monitors the size and composition of the HTM portfolio to evaluate its effect on First Guaranty’s liquidity. First Guaranty’s available-for-sale ("AFS") portfolio was $464.1 million or 71.5% of the investment portfolio as of June 30, 2015. The majority of the AFS portfolio was comprised of  U.S. Government Agencies, municipal bonds and investment grade corporate bonds. Management believes these securities are readily marketable and enhance First Guaranty’s liquidity.
First Guaranty maintained a net borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $131.4 million and $156.4 million at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. First Guaranty also has a discount window line with the Federal Reserve Bank. We also maintain federal funds lines of credit at various correspondent banks with borrowing capacity of $70.5 million and a revolving line of credit for $2.5 million with an availability of $0.7 million as of June 30, 2015. Management believes there is sufficient liquidity to satisfy current operating needs.
Capital Resources.
First Guaranty's capital position is reflected in shareholders’ equity, subject to certain adjustments for regulatory purposes. Further, our capital base allows us to take advantage of business opportunities while maintaining the level of resources we deem appropriate to address business risks inherent in daily operations.
Total shareholders’ equity increased to $145.8 million at June 30, 2015 from $139.6 million at December 31, 2014. The increase in total shareholders’ equity was principally the result of an increase in retained earnings of $5.0 million and a $1.1 million increase in the balance of the accumulated other comprehensive income from $0.2 million at December 31, 2014 to $1.4 million at June 30, 2015. The market value of available for sale securities (after taxes) increased primarily as a result of an unrealized gain on conversion of a preferred security into common stock with a readily determinable fair value. The $5.0 million increase in retained earnings was due to net income of $7.3 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2015, partially offset by $2.0 million in cash dividends paid on our common stock and $0.2 million in dividends paid on our Series C Preferred Stock issued to the Treasury in connection with our participation in the SBLF. We are currently at the contractual minimum dividend rate of 1.0% on our SBLF capital. Beginning on March 22, 2016, the per annum dividend rate on the Series C Preferred Stock will increase to a fixed rate of 9.0% if any Series C Preferred Stock remains outstanding.
Regulatory Capital .
Risk-based capital regulations adopted by the FDIC require banks to achieve and maintain specified ratios of capital to risk-weighted assets. Similar capital regulations apply to bank holding companies over $1.0 billion in assets. The risk-based capital rules are designed to measure “Tier 1” capital (consisting of common equity, retained earnings and a limited amount of qualifying perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities, net of goodwill and other intangible assets and accumulated other comprehensive income) and total capital in relation to the credit risk of both on- and off- balance sheet items. Under the guidelines, one of its risk weights is applied to the different on balance sheet items. Off-balance sheet items, such as loan commitments, are also subject to risk weighting. Applicable bank holding companies and all banks must maintain a minimum total capital to total risk weighted assets ratio of 8.00%, at least half of which must be in the form of core or Tier 1 capital. These guidelines also specify that bank holding companies that are experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels.
At June 30, 2015, we satisfied the minimum regulatory capital requirements and were well capitalized within the meaning of federal regulatory requirements.
"Well Capitalized Minimums"
As of June 30, 2015
As of December 31, 2014
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio
Consolidated
5.00
%
9.32
%
9.33 %
Bank
5.00
%
9.05
%
9.26 %
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital Ratio
Consolidated
8.00
%
12.98
%
13.16 %
Bank
8.00
%
12.64
%
13.08 %
Total Risk-based Capital Ratio
Consolidated
10.00
%
13.85
%
14.05 %
Bank
10.00
%
13.52
%
13.96 %
Common Equity Tier One Capital Ratio
Consolidated
6.50
% 9.37 % * %
Bank 6.50 % 12.64 % * %
*Not applicable at December 31, 2014.
39

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk
Our asset/liability management (ALM) process consists of quantifying, analyzing and controlling interest rate risk (IRR) to maintain reasonably stable net interest income levels under various interest rate environments. The principal objective of ALM is to maximize net interest income while operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate risk and to maintain adequate levels of liquidity.
The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, one of our most significant forms of market risk is interest rate risk, which is inherent in our lending and deposit-taking activities. Our assets, consisting primarily of loans secured by real estate and fixed rate securities in our investment portfolio, have longer maturities than our liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits. As a result, a principal part of our business strategy is to manage interest rate risk and reduce the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. The board of directors of First Guaranty Bank has established two committees, the management asset liability committee and the board investment committee, to oversee the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determining the level of risk that is appropriate given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the board of directors. The management asset liability committee is comprised of senior officers of the Bank and meets as needed to review our asset liability policies and interest rate risk position. The board ALCO investment committee is comprised of certain members of the board of directors of the Bank and meets monthly. The management asset liability committee provides a monthly report to the board ALCO investment committee.
The need for interest sensitivity gap management is most critical in times of rapid changes in overall interest rates. We generally seek to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations by maintaining a relatively balanced mix of rate sensitive assets and liabilities on a one-year time horizon and greater than one-year time horizon. Because of the significant impact on net interest margin from mismatches in repricing opportunities, we monitor the asset-liability mix periodically depending upon the management asset liability committee’s assessment of current business conditions and the interest rate outlook. We maintain exposure to interest rate fluctuations within prudent levels using varying investment strategies. These strategies include, but are not limited to, frequent internal modeling of asset and liability values and behavior due to changes in interest rates. We monitor cash flow forecasts closely and evaluate the impact of both prepayments and extension risk.
The following interest sensitivity analysis is one measurement of interest rate risk. This analysis, which we prepare monthly, reflects the contractual maturity characteristics of assets and liabilities over various time periods. This analysis does not factor in prepayments or interest rate floors on loans which may significantly change the report. This table includes nonaccrual loans in their respective maturity periods. The gap indicates whether more assets or liabilities are subject to repricing over a given time period. The interest sensitivity analysis at June 30, 2015 illustrated below reflects a liability-sensitive position with a negative cumulative gap on a one-year basis.
The interest spread and liability funding discussed below are directly related to changes in asset and liability mixes, volumes, maturities and repricing opportunities for interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Interest-sensitive assets and liabilities are those which are subject to repricing in the near term, including both floating or adjustable rate instruments and instruments approaching maturity. The interest sensitivity gap is the difference between total interest-sensitive assets and total interest-sensitive liabilities. Interest rates on our various asset and liability categories do not respond uniformly to changing market conditions. Interest rate risk is the degree to which interest rate fluctuations in the marketplace can affect net interest income.
June 30, 2015
Interest Sensitivity Within
(in thousands except for %)
3 Months Or Less
Over 3 Months thru 12
Months
Total One Year
Over One Year
Total
Earning Assets:
Loans (including loans held for sale) $
349,416
$
84,683
$
434,099
$
376,277
$
810,376
Securities (including FHLB stock)
6,746
16,204
22,950
627,761
650,711
Federal Funds Sold
340
-
340
-
340
Other earning assets
17,282
-
17,282
-
17,282
Total earning assets
$
373,784
$
100,887
$
474,671
$
1,004,038
$
1,478,709
Source of Funds:
Interest-bearing accounts:
Demand deposits
$
418,662
$
-
$
418,662
$
-
$
418,662
Savings deposits
77,354
-
77,354
-
77,354
Time deposits
159,444
248,196
407,640
235,900
643,540
Short-term borrowings
13,800
-
13,800
-
13,800
Long-term borrowings
-
-
-
1,155
1,155
Noninterest-bearing, net
-
-
-
324,198
324,198
Total source of funds
$
669,260
$
248,196
$
917,456
$
561,253
$
1,478,709
Period gap
$
(295,476
)
$
(147,309
)
$
(442,785
)
$
442,785
Cumulative gap
$
(295,476
)
$
(442,785
)
$
(442,785
)
$
-
Cumulative gap as a percent of earning assets
-20.0
% -29.9 % -29.9 %
40

Net interest income at risk measures the risk of a decline in earnings due to changes in interest rates. The first table below presents an analysis of our interest rate risk as measured by the estimated changes in net interest income resulting from an instantaneous and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve over a 12-month horizon at June 30, 2015. Shifts are measured in 100 basis point increments (+400 through -100 basis points) from base case. We don’t present shifts less than 100 basis points because of the current low interest rate environment. The base case scenario encompasses key assumptions for asset/liability mix, loan and deposit growth, pricing, prepayment speeds, deposit decay rates, securities portfolio cash flows and reinvestment strategy and the market value of certain assets under the various interest rate scenarios. The base case scenario assumes that the current interest rate environment is held constant throughout the forecast period for a static balance sheet and the instantaneous shocks are performed against that yield curve. The second table presents an analysis of our interest rate risk as measured by the estimated changes in net interest income resulting from a gradual shift in the yield curve over a 12 month horizon.
Instantaneous Changes in Interest Rates (In Basis Points)
Percent Change In Net Interest Income
+400 (17.93%)
+300 (10.57%)
+200
(6.44%)
+100 (2.87%)
Base -%
-100 (3.85%)
Gradual Change in Interest Rates (In Basis Points) Percent Change In Net Interest Income
+400 (4.52%)
+300
(2.89%)
+200
(1.70%)
+100 (0.78%)
Base -%
-100 (0.80%)

These scenarios above are both instantaneous shocks and gradual interest rate ramps that assume balance sheet management will mirror the base case. Even if interest rates change in the designated amounts, there can be no assurance that our assets and liabilities would perform as anticipated. Additionally, a change in the U.S. Treasury rates in the designated amounts accompanied by a change in the shape of the U.S. Treasury yield curve would cause significantly different changes to net interest income than indicated above. Strategic management of our balance sheet would be adjusted to accommodate these movements. As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the methods of analysis presented above. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Also, the ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase. We consider all of these factors in monitoring exposure to interest rate risk.
41

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), a Company's “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. First Guaranty maintains such controls designed to ensure this material information is communicated to Management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decision regarding required disclosure.
Management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report are effective. There were no changes in First Guaranty's internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter in the period covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, First Guaranty's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
At June 30, 2015, First Guaranty is subject to various legal proceedings in the normal course of business and otherwise. It is our belief that the ultimate resolution of such claims will not have a material adverse effect on First Guaranty's financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to our risk factors as disclosed in First Guaranty's Annual Report on Form 10-K.
42


Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are either filed as part of this report or are incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document.
43

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, First Guaranty has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
Date: August 13, 2015
By: /s/ Alton B. Lewis
Alton B. Lewis
Principal Executive Officer
Date: August 13, 2015
By: /s/ Eric J. Dosch
Eric J. Dosch
Principal Financial Officer
Secretary and Treasurer
44
TABLE OF CONTENTS