FOE 10-K Annual Report Dec. 31, 2016 | Alphaminr

FOE 10-K Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016

FERRO CORP
10-Qs and 10-Ks
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009
PROXIES
DEF 14A
Filed on March 25, 2021
DEF 14A
Filed on March 27, 2020
DEF 14A
Filed on March 21, 2019
DEF 14A
Filed on March 22, 2018
DEF 14A
Filed on March 23, 2017
DEF 14A
Filed on March 24, 2016
DEF 14A
Filed on March 23, 2015
DEF 14A
Filed on March 26, 2014
DEF 14A
Filed on March 28, 2012
DEF 14A
Filed on March 29, 2011
DEF 14A
Filed on March 29, 2010
10-K 1 c214-20161231x10k.htm 10-K 10-K 123116



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________________________________

Form 10-K

( Mark One)





ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

or



TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to __________

Commission file number 1-584

FERRO CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Ohio

34-0217820

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

6060 Parkland Blvd.

Suite 250

Mayfield Heights, OH

(Address of Principal Executive O ffices)

44124

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 216-875-5600





Securities Registered Pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, par value $1.00

New York Stock Exchange



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES NO

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  YES NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES NO

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained here, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES NO

The aggregate market value of Ferro Corporation Common Stock, par value $1.00, held by non-affiliates and based on the closin g sale price as of June 30, 2016 , was approximately $1,096,926 ,000 .

On January 31, 2017, there were 83,438,992 shares of Ferro Corporation Common Stock, par value $1.00 outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statem ent for Ferro Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.










TABLE OF CONTENTS





 PART I

Item 1

Business

Page 3

Item 1A

Risk Factors

Page 7

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

Page 15

Item 2

Properties

Page 15

Item 3

Legal Proceedings

Page 15

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

Page 16



PART II

Item 5

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Page 18

Item 6

Selected Financial Data

Page 19

Item 7

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Page 20

Item 7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Page 43

Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Page 44

Item 9

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Page 9 7

Item 9A

Controls and Procedures

Page 9 7

Item 9B

Other Information

Page 100



PART III

Item 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Page 101

Item 11

Executive Compensation

Page 101

Item 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Page 101

Item 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Page 10 2

Item 14

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Page  10 2



PART IV

Item 15

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Page 10 3



2


PART I

Item 1 — Business

History, Organization and Products

Ferro Corporation was incorporated in Ohio in 1919 as an enameling company and today is a leading producer of specialty materials that are sold to a broad range of manufacturers who, in turn, make products for many end-use markets.  When we use the terms “Ferro,” “we,” “us” or “the Company,” we are referring to Ferro Corporation and its subsidiaries unless indicated otherwise.

Ferro’s products fall into two general categories: functional coatings, which perform specific functions in the manufacturing processes and end products of our customers; and color solutions, which provide aesthetic and performance characteristics to our customers’ products. Our products are manufactured in approximately 41 facilities around the world.  They include:

Frits, porcelain and other glass enamels, glazes, stains, decorating colors, pigments, inks, polishing materials, dielectrics, electronic glasses, and other specialty coatings.

Ferro develop s and deliver s innovative products to our customers based on our strengths in the following technologies :

·

Particle Engineering — Our ability to design and produce very small particles made of a broad variety of materials, with precisely controlled characteristics of shape, size and size distribution. We understand how to disperse these particles within liquid, paste and gel formulations.

·

Color and Glass Science — Our understanding of the chemistry required to develop and produce pigments that provide color characteristics ideally suited to customers’ applications. We have a demonstrated ability to provide glass-based coatings with properties that precisely meet customers’ needs in a broad variety of applications.

·

Surface Chemistry and Surface Application Technology — Our understanding of chemicals and materials used to develop products and processes that involve the interface between layers and the surface properties of materials.

·

Formulation — Our ability to develop and manufacture combinations of materials that deliver specific performance characteristics designed to work within customers’ particular products and manufacturing processes.

We differentiate ourselves in our industry by the consistent high quality of our products, combined with delivery of localized technical service and customized application technology support.  Our value-added technology services assist customers in their material specification and evaluation, product design, and manufacturing process characterization in order to help them optimize the application of our products.

Ferro’s operations are divided into four business units, which comprise three reportable segments listed below:



Tile Coating Systems (1)

Porcelain Enamel (1)

Performance Colors and Glass

Pigments, Powders and Oxides

_____________________

(1)

Tile Coating Systems and Porcelain Enamel are combined into one reportable segment, Performance Coatings, for financial reporting purposes.

Financial information about our segments is included herein in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3


Markets and Customers

Ferro’s products are used in a variety of product applications in markets including:





Appliances

Household furnishings

Automobiles

Industrial products

Building and renovation

Packaging

Electronics

Many of our products are used as coatings on our customers’ products, such as glazes and decorations on tile, glass and dinnerware. Other products are supplied to customers as powders that are used to manufacture electronic components and other products. Still other products are added during our customers’ manufacturing processes to provide desirable properties to their end product. Often, our products are a small portion of the total cost of our customers’ products, but they can be critical to the appearance or functionality of those products.

Our customers include manufacturers of ceramic tile, major appliances, construction materials, aut omobile parts, automobile, architectural and container glass, and electronic components and devices . Many of our customers, including makers of major appliances and automobile parts, purchase materials from more than one of our business units. Our customer base is well diversified both geographically and by end market.

We generally sell our products directly to our customers. However, a portion of our business uses indirect sales channels, such as agents and distributors, to del iver products to mar ket. In 2016 , no single customer or related group of customers represented more than 10% of net sales. In addition, none of our reportable segments is dependent on any single customer or related group of customers.

Backlog of Orders and Seasonality

Generally, there is no significant lead time between customer orders and delivery in any of our business segments. As a result, we do not consider that the dollar amount of backlogged orders believed to be firm is material information for an understanding of our business. We also do not regard any material part of our business to be seasonal. However, customer demand has historically been higher in the second quarter when building and renovation markets are particularly active, and this quarter is normally the strongest for sales and operating profit.

Competition

In most of our markets, we have a substantial number of competitors, none of which is dominant. Due to the diverse nature of our product lines, no single competitor directly matches all of our product offerings. Our competition varies by product and by region, and is based primarily on price, product quality and performance, customer service and technical support, and our ability to develop custom products to meet specific customer requirements.

We are a worldwide leader in the production of glass enamels, porcelain enamels, and ceramic tile coatings. There is strong competition in our markets, ranging from large multinational corporations to local producers. While many of our customers purchase customized products and formulations from us, our customers could generally buy from other sources, if necessary.

4


Raw Materials and Supplier Relations

Raw materials widely used in our operations include:





Metal Oxides:

Other Inorganic Materials:

Aluminum oxide (1)

Boron (2)

Cobalt oxide (1)(2)

Clay (2)

Iron Oxide (1)

Feldspar (2)

Lead Oxide (1)

Lithium (2)

Nickel oxide (1)(2)

Silica (2)

Titanium dioxide (1)(2)

Zircon (2)

Zinc oxide (2)

Zirconium dioxide (2)







Precious and Non-precious Metals:

Energy:

Bismuth (1)

Electricity

Chrome (1)(2)

Natural gas

Copper (1)

Gold (1)

Silver (1)





(1)

Primarily used by the Performance Colors and Glass and the Pigments, Powders and Oxides segments .

(2)

Primarily used by the Performance Coatings segment .

These raw materials make up a large portion of our product costs in certain of our product lines, and fluctuations in the cost of raw materials can have a significant impact on the financial performance of the related businesses. We attempt to pass through to our customers raw material cost increases.

We have a broad supplier base and, in many instances, multiple sources of essential raw materials are available worldwide if problems arise with a particular supplier. We maintain many comprehensive supplier agreements for strategic and critical raw materials. We did not encounte r raw material shortages in 2016 that significantly affected our manufacturing operations, but we are subject to volatile raw material costs that can affect our results of operations.

Environmental Matters

As part of the production of some of our products, we handle, process, use and store hazardous materials. As a result, we operate manufacturing facilities that are subject to a broad array of environmental laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate, particularly for plant wastes and emissions. In addition, some of our products are subject to restrictions under laws or regulations such as California ’s Proposition 65 or the European Union’s (“EU”) chemical substances directive. The costs to comply with complex environmental laws and regulations are significant and will continue for the industry and us for the foreseeable future. These routine costs are expensed as they are incurred. While these costs may increase in the future, they are not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with the environmental regulations to which our operations are subject and that, to the extent we may not be in compliance with such regulations, non-compliance will not have a materially adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

5


Our policy is to operate our plants and facilities in a manner that protects the environment and the health and safety of our employees and the public. We intend to continue to make expenditures for environmental protection and improvements in a timely manner consistent with available technology. Although we cannot precisely predict future environmental spending, we do not expect the costs to have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations. Capital expenditures for environmental protection were $ 1.4 million in 2016 , $5.5 million in 2015 , and $0.7 million in 2014 . We also accrue for environmental remediation costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and we can reasonably estimate the amount. We determine the timing and amount of any liability based upon assumptions regarding future events, and inherent uncertainties exist in such evaluations primarily due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulations and legal standards regarding liability, and evolving technologies. We adjust these liabilities periodically as remediation efforts progress, the nature and extent of contamination become s more certain, or as additional technical or legal information become s available.

Research and Development

We are involved worldwide in research and development activities relating to new and existing products, services and technologies required by our customers’ continually changing markets. Our research and development resources are organized into centers of excellence that support our regional and worldwide major business units . These centers are augmented by local laboratories that provide technical service and support to meet customer and market needs in various geographic areas.

Total expenditures for product and application technology, including research and development, customer technical support and other related activities , were $27.3 million in 2016 , $25.6 million in 2015 , and $22.7 million in 2014 .

Patents, Trademarks and Licenses

We own a substantial number of patents and patent applications relating to our various products and their uses. While these patents are of importance to us and we exercise diligence to ensure that they are valid, we do not believe that the invalidity or expiration of any single patent or group of patents would have a material adverse effect on our businesses. Our patents will expire at various dates through the year 2034 . We also use a number of trademarks that are important to o ur businesses as a whole or to particular segment s of our business . We believe that these trademarks are adequately protected.

Employees

At December 31, 2016 , we employed 5,125 full -time employees, including 4,326 employees in our foreign c onsolidated subsidiaries and 799 in the Unit ed States (“U.S.”) . T otal employment increased by 218 in o ur foreign subsidiaries and by 6 1 in the U.S. from the prior year end due to the additions related to acquisitions and new b usiness opportunities net of cost r eduction initiatives .

Collectiv e bargaining agreements cover 12.5 % of our U.S. workforce. Approximately 8.1% of all U.S. employees are affected by labor agreements that expire in 2017, and we expect to complete renewals of these agreements with no significant disruption to the related businesses. We consider our relations with our employees, including those covered by collective bargaining agreements, to be good.

Our employees in Europe have protections afforded them by local laws and regulations through unions and works councils. Some of these laws and regulations may affect the timing, amount and nature of restructuring and cost reduction programs in that region.

Domestic and Foreign Operations

We began international operations in 1927. Our products are manufactured and/or distributed through our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates in the following countries:



6


Consolidated Subsidiaries:





Argentina

Egypt

Luxembourg

Spain

Australia

France

Malaysia

Taiwan

Belgium

Germany

Mexico

Thailand

Brazil

India

Netherlands

United Kingdom

Bulgaria

Indonesia

Poland

United States

Canada

Ireland

Portugal

Turkey

China

Italy

Romania

Colombia

Japan

Russia



Unconsolidated Affiliates:





China

Egypt

Italy

South Korea

Ecuador

Indonesia

Spain





Financial information for geograp hic areas is included in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K . More than 70% of our net sales are outside of the U.S. Our customers represent more than 30 industries and operate in approximately 100 countries.

Our U.S. parent company receives technical service fees and/or royalties from many of its foreign subsidiaries. As a matter of corporate policy, the foreign subsidiaries have historically been expected to remit a portion of their annual earnings to the U.S. parent company as dividends. To the extent earnings of foreign subsidiaries are not remitted to the U.S. parent company, those earnings are indefinitely re-invested in those subsidiaries.

Available Information

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, including any amendments, will be made available free of charge on our Web site, www.ferro.com, as soon as reasonably practical, following the filing of the reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our Corporate G overnance Principles, legal and ethical p olicies, Guidelines for Determining Director Independence, and charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance and Nomination Committee are available free of charge on our Web site or to any shareholder who requests them from the Ferro Corporation Investor Relations Department located at 6060 Parkland Blvd., Suite 250, Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124.

Forward-looking Statements

Certain statements contained here and in future filings with the SEC reflect our expectations with respect to future performance and constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are subject to a variety of uncertainties, unknown risks and other factors concerning our operations and the business environment, which are difficult to predict and are beyond our control.

Item 1A — Risk Fac tors

Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those suggested by statements contained in this filing and could adversely affect our future financial performance. Such factors include the following:

We sell our products into industries where demand has been unpredictable, cyclical or heavily influenced by consumer spending, and such demand and our results of operations may be further impacted by macro-economic circumstances.

We sell our products to a wide variety of customers who supply many different market segments. Many of these market segments, such as building and renovation, major appliances, transportation, and electronics, are cyclical or closely tied to consumer demand. Consumer demand is difficult to accurately forecast and incorrect forecasts of demand or unforeseen reductions in demand can adversely

7


affect costs and profitability due to factors such as underused manufacturing capacity, excess inventory, or working capital needs. Our forecasting systems and modeling tools may not accurately predict changes in demand for our products or other market conditions.

Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in capital markets and economies in the U.S. and elsewhere around the world. Concerns over fluctuating prices, energy costs, geopolitical issues, government deficits and debt loads, and the availability and cost of credit have contributed to economic uncertainty around the world. Our customers may be impacted by these conditions and may modify, delay, or cancel plans to purchase our products. Additionally, if customers are not successful in generating sufficient revenue or are precluded from securing financing, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, accounts receivable that are owed to us. A reduction in demand or inability of customers to pay us for our products may adversely affect our earnings and cash flow.

We strive to improve operating margins through sales growth, price increases, productivity gains, and improved purchasing techniques, but we may not achieve the desired improvements.

We work to improve operating profit margins through activities such as growing sales to achieve increased economies of scale, increasing prices, improving manufacturing processes, and adopting purchasing techniques that lower costs or provide increased cost predictability to realize cost savings. However, these activities depend on a combination of improved product design and engineering, effective manufacturing process control initiatives, cost-effective redistribution of production, and other efforts that may not be as successful as anticipated. The success of sales growth and price increases depends not only on our actions but also on the strength of customer demand and competitors' pricing responses, which are not fully predictable. Failure to successfully implement actions to improve operating margins could adversely affect our financial performance.

The global scope of our operations exposes us to risks related to currency conversion rates, new and different regulatory schemes and changing economic, regulatory, social and political conditions around the world.

More than 70% of our ne t sales during 2016 were outside of the U.S. In order to support our customers, access regional markets and compete effectively, our operations are located around the world. Our operations are subject to economic, regulatory, social and political conditions in multiple locations and we are subject to risks relating to currency conversion rates. We also may encounter difficulties expanding into additional growth markets around the world. Other risks inherent in international operations include the following:



·

New and different legal and regulatory requirements and enforcement m echanisms in the U.S. and other countries ;

·

U.S. and other export licenses may be difficult to obtain and we may be subject to import or export duties or import quotas or other trade restrictions or barriers;

·

Increased costs, and decreased availability, of transportation or shipping;

·

Credit risk and financial conditions of local customers and distributors;

·

Risk of nationalization of private enterprises by foreign governments or restrictions on investments;

·

Potentially adverse tax consequences, including imposition or increase of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by subsidiaries; and

·

P olitical, economic and social conditions, including the possibility of hyperinflationary conditions, deflation, and political instability in certain countries.

We have subsidiaries in Turkey and in Egypt, countries with recent political strains that are located near politically volatile regions. Such conditions could potentially impact our ability to recover both the cost of our investments and earnings from those investments. While we attempt to anticipate these changes and manage our business appropriately in each location where we do business, these changes are often beyond our control and difficult to forecast.

The consequences of these risks may have significant adverse effects on our results of operations or financial position, and if we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could be exposed to civil and criminal penalties, reputational harm, and restrictions on our operations.

8


We may not be able to complete or successfully integrate future acquisitions into our business, which could adversely affect our business or results of operations.

As part of our strategy, we have and intend to continue to pursue acquisitions. Our success in accomplishing growth through acquisitions may be limited by the availability and suitability of acquisition candidates and by our financial resources, including available cash and borrowing capacity. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulty determining appropriate valuation, integrating operations, technologies, services and products of the acquired product lines or businesses, personnel turnover, and the diversion of management's attention from other business matters. In addition, we may be unable to achieve anticipated benefits from these acquisitions in the time frame that we anticipate, or at all, which could adversely affect our business or results of operations.

We have a presence in regions of the world where it can be difficult for a multi-national company such as Ferro to compete lawfully with local competitors, which may cause us to lose business opportunities.

We pursue business opportunities around the world and many of our most promising growth opportunities are in developing markets and the Asia-Pacific region, including the People’s Republic of China, Latin America , and the Middle East . Although we have been able to compete successfully in those markets to date, local laws and customs can make it difficult for a multi-national company such as Ferro to compete on a “level playing field” with local competitors without engaging in conduct that would be illegal under U.S. or other countries anti- bribery laws. Our strict policy of observing the highest standards of legal and ethical conduct may cause us to lose some otherwise attractive business opportunities to competitors in these regions.

We have undertaken and continue to undertake optimization and cost-savings initiatives, including restructuring programs, to improve our operating performance, but we may not be able to implement and/or administer these initiatives in the manner contemplated and these initiatives may not produce the desired results.

We have undertaken optimization and cost-savings initiatives, including restructuring programs, and may undertake additional optimization and cost-savings initiatives in the future. These initiatives involve, among other things, restructuring programs that involve plant closures and staff reductions. Although we expect these initiatives to help us achieve incremental cost savings and operational efficiencies, we may not be able to implement and/or administer these initiatives, including plant closures and staff reductions, in the manner contemplated, which could cause the initiatives to fail to achieve the desired results. Additionally, the implementation of these initiatives may result in impairment charges, some of which could be material. Even if we do implement and administer these initiatives in the manner contemplated, they may not produce the desired results. Accordingly, the initiatives that we have implemented and those that we may implement in the future may not improve our operating performance and may not help us achieve cost savings. Failure to successfully implement and/or administer these initiatives could have an adverse effect on our financial performance.

Our businesses depend on a continuous stream of new products, and failure to introduce new products could affect our sales, profitability and liquidity.

One way that we remain competitive is by developing and introducing new and improved products on an ongoing basis. Customers continually evaluate our products in comparison to those offered by our competitors. A failure to introduce new products at the right time that are price competitive and that provide the performance and other features required by customers could adversely affect our sales, or could require us to compensate by lowering prices. In addition, when we invest in new product development, we face risks related to production delays, cost over-runs and unanticipated technical difficulties, which could impact sales, profitability and/or liquidity.

Our strategy includes seeking opportunities in new growth markets, and failure to identify or successfully enter such markets could affect our ability to grow our revenues and earnings.

Certain of our products are sold into mature markets and part of our strategy is to identify and enter into markets growing more rapidly. These growth opportunities may involve new geographies, new product lines, new technologies, or new customers.  We may not successfully exploit such opportunities and our ability to increase our revenue and earnings could be impacted as a result .



9


We rely on information systems to conduct our business and interruption, or damage to, or failure or compromise of, these systems may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We rely on information systems to obtain, process, analyze and manage data to forecast and facilitate the purchase and distribution of our products; to receive, process, and ship orders on a ti mely basis; to account for our product and service transactions with customers; to manage the accurate billing and collections for thousands of customers; to process payments to suppliers; and to manage data and records relating to our employees, contractors, and other individuals. Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected if these systems are interrupted, damaged, or compromised or if they fail for any extended period of time, due to events including but not limited to programming errors, computer viruses and security breaches. Information privacy and security risks have generally increased in recent years because of the proliferation of new technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyber-attacks, and prevention of privacy or security breaches cannot be assured. In addition, the processing and storage of certain information is increasingly subject to privacy and data security regulations and such regulations are country-specific and subject to differing interpretations and may be inconsistent among jurisdictions. We may be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance our information privacy and security measures, investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities and/or comply with regulatory requirements. In addition, third-party service providers are responsible for managing a significant portion of our information systems, and we are subject to risk as a result of possible information privacy and security breaches of those third parties. The consequences of these risks could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

We are subject to a number of restrictive covenants under our revolving credit facility, which could affect our flexibility to fund ongoing operations and strategic initiatives, and, if we are unable to maintain compliance with such covenants, could lead to significant challenges in meeting our liquidity requirements.

Our New Credit Facility , entered into on February 14, 2017, contains a number of restrictive covenants, including those described in more detail in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10 ‑K. These covenants include limitations on use of loan proceeds, limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock, limitations on acquisitions and dispositions and limitations on certain types of investments.  The New Credit Facility also contains standard provisions relating to conditions of borrowing and customary events of default, including the non-payment of obligations by the Company and the bankruptcy of the Company. Specific to the revolving credit facility, the Company is subject to a financial covenant regarding the Company’s max imum leverage ratio . If an event of default occurs, all amounts outstanding under the New Credit Facility may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. The New Credit Facility is described in more detail in “Capital Resources and Liquidity” under Item 7 and in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We depend on external financial resources, and the economic environment and credit market uncertainty could interrupt our access to capital markets, borrowings, or financial transactions to hedge certain risks, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

At December 31, 2016 , we had approximately $574.5 million of short-term and long-term debt with varying maturities and approximately $35.1 million of off balance sheet arrangements, including consignment arrangements for precious metals, bank guarantees, and standby letters of credit. These arrangements have allowed us to make investments in growth opportunities and fund working capital requirements. In addition, we may enter into financial transactions to hedge certain risks, including foreign exchange, commodity pricing, and sourcing of certain raw materials. Our continued access to capital markets, the stability of our lenders, customers and financial partners and their willingness to support our needs are essential to our liquidity and our ability to meet our current obligations and to fund operations and our strategic initiatives. An interruption in our access to external financing or financial transactions to hedge risk could adversely affect our business prospects and financial condition. See further information regarding our liquidity in “Capital Resources and Liquidity” under Item 7 and in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10 ‑K.

We depend on reliable sources of energy and raw materials, minerals and other supplies, at a reasonable cost, but the availability of these materials and supplies could be interrupted and/or their prices could change and adversely affect our sales and profitability.

We purchase energy and many raw materials, which we use to manufacture our products. Changes in their availability or price could affect our ability to manufacture enough products to meet customers' demands or to manufacture products profitably. We try to maintain multiple sources of raw materials and supplies where practical, but this may not prevent unanticipated changes in their

10


availability or cost and, for certain raw materials, there may not be alternative sources. We may not be able to pass cost increases through to our customers. Significant disruptions in availability or cost increases could adversely affect our manufacturing volume or costs, which could negatively affect product sales or profitability of our operations.

Sales of our products to certain customers or into certain industries may expose us to different and complex regulatory regimes.

We seek to expand our customer base and the industries into which we sell. Selling products to certain customers or into certain industries, such as governments or the defense industry, requires compliance with regulatory regimes that do not apply to sales involving other customers or industries and that can be complex and difficult to navigate. Our failure to comply with these regulations could result in liabilities or damage to our reputation, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Regulatory authorities in the U.S., European Union and elsewhere are taking a much more aggressive approach to regulating hazardous materials and other substances, and those regulations could affect sales of our products.

Legislation and regulations concerning hazardous materials and other substances can restrict the sale of products and/or increase the cost of producing them. Some of our products are subject to restrictions under laws or regulations such as California’s Proposition 65 or the EU’s chemical substances directive. The EU “REACH” registration system requires us to perform studies of some of our products or components of our products and to register the information in a central database, increasing the cost of these products. As a result of such regulations, customers may avoid purchasing some products in favor of less hazardous or less costly alternatives. It may be impractical for us to continue manufacturing heavily regulated products, and we may incur costs to shut down or transition such operations to alternative products. These circumstances could adversely affect our business, including our sales and operating profits.

The markets for our products are highly competitive and subject to intense price competition, which could adversely affect our sales and earnings performance.

Our customers typically have multiple suppliers from which to choose. If we are unwilling or unable to provide products at competitive prices, and if other factors, such as product performance and value-added services do not provide an offsetting competitive advantage, customers may reduce, discontinue, or decide not to purchase our products. If we could not secure alternate customers for lost business, our sales and earnings performance could be adversely affected.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights , including trade secrets, or to successfully resolve claims of infringement brought against us, our product sales and financial performance could be adversely affected.

Our performance may depend in part on our ability to establish, protect and enforce intellectual property rights with respect to our products, technologies and proprietary rights and to defend against any claims of infringement, which involves complex legal, scientific and factual questions and uncertainties. We may have to rely on litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights. The intellectual property laws of some countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. In addition, we may face claims of infringement that could interfere with our ability to use technology or other intellectual property rights that are material to our business operations. If litigation that we initiate is unsuccessful, we may not be able to protect the value of some of our intellectual property. In the event a claim of infringement against us is successful, we may be required to pay royalties or license fees to continue to use technology or other intellectual property rights that we have been using or we may be unable to obtain necessary licenses from third parties at a reasonable cost or within a reasonable time.

Our operations are subject to operating hazards and, as a result, to stringent environmental, health and safety regulations, and compliance with those regulations could require us to make significant investments.

Our production facilities are subject to hazards associated with the manufacture, handling, storage, and transportation of chemical materials and products. These hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to, or destruction of, property and equipment and environmental contamination and other environmental damage and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We strive to maintain our production facilities and conduct our manufacturing operations in a manner that is safe and in compliance with all applicable environmental, health and safety regulations. Compliance with changing regulations, or other circumstances, may require us to make significant capital investments, incur training costs, make changes in manufacturing processes or product

11


formulations, or incur costs that could adversely affect our profitability, and violations of these laws could lead to substantial fines and penalties. These costs may not affect competitors in the same way due to differences in product formulations, manufacturing locations or other factors, and we could be at a competitive disadvantage, which might adversely affect financial performance.

We have limited or no redundancy for certain of our manufacturing facilities, and damage to or interference with those facilities could interrupt our operations, increase our costs of doing business and impair our ability to deliver our products on a timely basis.

If certain of our existing production facilities become incapable of manufacturing products for any reason, we may be unable to meet production requirements, we may lose revenue and we may not be able to maintain our relationships with our customers. Without operation of certain existing production facilities, we may be limited in our ability to deliver products until we restore the manufacturing capability at the particular facility, find an alternative manufacturing facility or arrange an alternative source of supply. Although we carry business interruption insurance to cover lost revenue and profits in an amount we consider adequate, this insurance does not cover all possible situations. In addition, our business interruption insurance would not compensate us for the loss of opportunity and potential adverse impact on relations with our existing customers resulting from our inability to produce products for them.

If we are unable to manage our general and administrative expenses, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively impacted.

We may not be able to manage our administrative expense in all circumstances. While we attempt to effectively manage such expenses, including through projects designed to create administrative efficiencies, increases in staff-related and other administrative expenses may occur from time to time. Recently, we have made significant efforts to achieve general and administrative cost savings and improve our operational performance. As a part of these initiatives, we have and will continue to consolidate business and management operations and enter into arrangements with third parties offering additional cost savings. It cannot be assured that our strategies to reduce our general and administrative costs and improve our operating performance will be successful or achieve the anticipated savings.

Our multi-jurisdictional tax structure may not provide favorable tax efficiencies.

We conduct our business operations in a number of countries and are subject to taxation in those jurisdictions. While we seek to minimize our worldwide effective tax rate, our corporate structure may not optimize tax efficiency opportunities. We develop our tax position based upon the anticipated nature and structure of our business and the tax laws, administrative practices and judicial decisions now in effect in the countries in which we have assets or conduct business, which are subject to change or differing interpretations. In addition, our effective tax rate could be adversely affected by several other factors, including: increases in expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes, the tax effects of restructuring charges or purchase accounting for acquisitions, changes related to our ability to ultimately realize future benefits attributed to our deferred tax assets, including those related to other-than-temporary impairment, and a change in our decision to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings. Further, we are subject to review and audit by both domestic and foreign tax authorities, which may result in adverse decisions. Increased tax expense could have a negative effect on our operating results and financial condition.

We have significant deferred tax assets, and if we are unable to utilize these assets, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

To fully realize the carrying value of our net deferred tax assets, we will have to generate adequate taxable profits in various tax jurisdictions. At December 31, 2016 , we had $80.3 million of net deferred tax assets, after valuation allowances. If we do not generate adequate profits within the time periods required by applicable tax statutes, the carrying value of the tax assets will not be realized. If it becomes unlikely that the carrying value of our net deferred tax assets will be realized, the valuation allowances may need to be increased in our consolidated financial statements, adversely affecting results of operations. Further information on our deferred tax assets is presented in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10 ‑K.

12


We may not be successful in implementing our strategies to increase our return on invested capital.

We are taking steps to generate a higher return on invested capital. There are risks associated with the implementation of these steps, which may be complicated and may involve substantial capital investment. To the extent we fail to achieve these strategies, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

We are subject to stringent labor and employment laws in certain jurisdictions in which we operate, we are party to various collective bargaining arrangements, and our relationship with our employees could deteriorate, which could adversely impact our operations.

A majority of our full-time employees are employed outside the U.S. In certain jurisdictions where we operate, labor and employment laws are relatively stringent and, in many cases, grant significant job protection to certain employees, including rights on termination of employment. In addition, in certain countries where we operate, our employees are members of unions or are represented by works councils. We are often required to consult and seek the consent or advice of these unions and/or works councils. These regulations and laws, coupled with the requirement to consult with the relevant unions or works councils, could have a significant impact on our flexibility in managing costs and responding to market changes.

Furthermore, approximately 12.5 % of our U.S. employees as of December 31, 2016 , are subject to collective bargaining arrangements or similar arrangements. Approximately 8.1% of all U.S. employees are affected by labor agreements that expire in 2017, and we expect to complete renewals of these agreements with no significant disruption to the related businesses. W hile we expect to be able to renew these  agreements without significant disruption to our business when they are scheduled to expire, there can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate labor agreements on satisfactory terms or that actions by our employees will not be disruptive to our business. If these workers were to engage in a strike, work stoppage or other slowdown or if other employees were to become unionized, we could experience a significant disruption of our operations and/or higher ongoing labor costs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Employee benefit costs, especially postretirement costs, constitute a significant element of our annual expenses, and funding these costs could adversely affect our financial condition.

Employee benefit costs are a significant element of our cost structure. Certain expenses, particularly postretirement costs under defined benefit pension plans and healthcare costs for employees and retirees, may increase significantly at a rate that is difficult to forecast and may adversely affect our financial results, financial condition or cash flows. Changes in the applicable discount rate can affect our postretirement obligation. Declines in global capital markets may cause reductions in the value of our pension plan assets. Such circumstances could have an adverse effect on future pension expense and funding requirements. Further information regarding our retirement benefits is presented in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10 ‑K.

Our implementation and operation of business information systems and processes could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.

We have been implementing and operating information systems and related business processes for our business operations. Implementation and operation of information systems and related processes involves risk, including risks related to programming and data transfer. Costs of implementation also could be greater than anticipated. In addition, we may be unable or decide not to implement such systems and processes in certain locations. Inherent risks, decisions and constraints related to implementation and operation of information systems could result in operating inefficiencies and could impact our ability to perform business transactions. These risks could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

We are subject to risks associated with outsourcing functions to third parties.

We have entered into outsourcing agreements with third parties, and rely on such parties, to provide certain services in support of our business. One such vendor provides a number of business services related to our information systems and finance and accounting activity. Arrangements with third party service providers may make our operations vulnerable if vendors fail to provide the expected service or there are changes in their own operations, financial condition, or other matters outside of our control. If these service providers are unable to perform to our requirements or to provide the level of service expected, our operating results and financial condition may

13


suffer and we may be forced to pursue alternatives to provide these services, which could result in delays, business disruptions and additional expenses.

There are risks associated with the manufacture and sale of our materials into industries making products for sensitive applications.

We manufacture and sell materials to parties that make products for sensitive applications, such as medical devices. The supply of materials that enter the human body involves the risk of injury to consumers, as well as commercial risks. Injury to consumers could result from, among other things, tampering by unauthorized third parties or the introduction into the material of foreign objects, substances, chemicals and other agents during the manufacturing, packaging, storage, handling or transportation phases. Shipment of adulterated materials may be a violation of law and may lead to an increased risk of exposure to product liability or other claims, product recalls and increased scrutiny by federal and state regulatory agencies. Such claims or liabilities may not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against third parties. In addition, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our materials caused illness or injury could have a material adverse effect on our reputation with existing and potential customers, which could negatively impact our business, operating results or financial condition.

We are exposed to lawsuits in the normal course of business, which could harm our business.

We are from time to time exposed to certain legal proceedings, which may include claims involving product liability, infringement of intellectual property rights of third parties and other claims. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, we can give no assurance that we will prevail on claims made against us in the lawsuits that we currently face or that additional claims will not be made against us in the future. We do not believe that lawsuits we currently face are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. Future claims or lawsuits, if they were to result in a ruling adverse to us, could give rise to substantial liability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.

We are exposed to intangible asset risk, and a write down of our intangible assets could have an adverse impact to our operating results and financial position.

We have recorded intangible assets, including goodwill, in connection with business acquisitions. We are required to perform goodwill impairment tests on at least an annual basis and whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows. As a result of our annual and other periodic evaluations, we may determine that the intangible asset values need to be written down to their fair values, which could result in material charges that could be adverse to our operating results and financial position. See further information regarding our goodwill and other intangible assets in “Critical Accounting Policies” under Item 7 and in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Interest rates on some of our borrowings are variable, and our borrowing costs could be adversely affected by interest rate increases.

Portions of our debt obligations have variable interest rates. Generally, when interest rates rise, our cost of borrowings increases. We estimate, based on the debt obligations outstanding at December 31, 2016 , that a one percent increase in interest rates would cause interest expense to increase by $5.6 million annually . Although interest rates have remained relatively stable over the past few years, future increases could raise our cost of borrowings and adversely affect our financial performance. See further information regarding our interest rates on our debt obligations in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” under Item 7A and in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Many of our assets are encumbered by liens that have been granted to lenders, and those liens affect our flexibility to dispose of property and businesses.

Certain of our debt obligations are secured by substantially all of our assets. These liens could reduce our ability and/or extend the time to dispose of property and businesses, as these liens must be cleared or waived by the lenders prior to any disposition. These security interests are described in more detail in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10 ‑K.

14


We may not pay dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as our Board of Directors from time to time may declare out of funds legally available for such purposes. Our Board of Directors has no obligation to declare dividends under Ohio law or our amended Articles of Incorporation. We may not pay dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. Any determination by our Board of Directors to pay dividends in the future will be based on various factors, including our financial condition, results of operations and current anticipated cash needs and any limits our then-existing credit facility and other debt instruments place on our ability to pay dividends.

We are exposed to risks associated with acts of God, terrorists and others, as well as fires, explosions, wars, riots, accidents, embargoes, natural disasters, strikes and other work stoppages, quarantines and other governmental actions, and other events or circumstances that are beyond our control.

Ferro is exposed to risks from various events that are beyond our control, which may have significant effects on our results of operations. While we attempt to mitigate these risks through appropriate loss prevention measures, insurance, contingency planning and other means, we may not be able to anticipate all risks or to reasonably or cost-effectively manage those risks that we do anticipate. As a result, our operations could be adversely affected by circumstances or events in ways that are significant and/or long lasting.

The risks and uncertainties identified above are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial also may adversely affect us. If any known or unknown risks and uncertainties develop into actual events, these developments could have material adverse effects on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.



Item 1B — Unresolved Staff Comments

None .

Item 2 — Properties

We lease our corporate headquarters offices, which are located at 6060 Parkland Blvd. , Mayfield Heights, Ohio.  The C ompany owns other corporate facilities worldwide.  We own principal manufacturing plants that range in size from 18,000 sq. ft. to over 700,000 sq. ft.  Plants we own with more than 250,000 sq. ft. are located in Spain; Germany; Belgium; Colombia; Mexico; Cleveland, Ohio; and Penn Yan, New York .  The locations of these principal manufacturing plants by reportable segment are as follows:

Pigments, Powders and Oxides-U.S.: Penn Yan, New York and Norcross, Georgia.  Outside the U.S.: Colombia, China, India, Belgium, France, Romania, Spain and Brazil.



Performance Colors and Glass-U.S.: Washington, Pennsylvania, and Orrville, Ohio.  Outside the U.S.:  Brazil, China, France, Germany, Mexico, Spain, and the United Kingdom.



Performance Coatings-U.S.: Cleveland, Ohio.  Outside the U.S.: Argentina, Brazil, China, Egypt, France, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, Spain, Poland, Portugal, and Thailand.

In addition, we lease manufacturing facilities for the Performance Colors and Glass segment in the United Kingdom; Germany; Japan; Italy; King of Prussia, Pennsylvania; and Vista, California.  We also lease manufacturing facilities for the Performance Coatings segment in Italy and Poland.  In some instances, the manufacturing facilities are used for two or more segments.  Leased facilities range in size from 15 ,000 sq. ft. to over 100,000 sq. ft.



Item 3 — Legal Proceedings

There are various lawsuits and claims pending against the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. We do not currently expect the resolution of such matters to materially affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.



15


Item 4 — Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

16


Executive Officers of the Registrant

The executive officers of the Company as of March 1 , 2017 , are listed below, along wi th their ages and business experience during the past five years. The year indicates when the individual was named to the indicated position with Ferro, unless otherwise indicated .

Peter T. Thomas — 6 1

Chairman of the Board of Directors, 2014

President and Chief Executive Officer, 2013

Interim President and Chief Executive Officer, 2012

Mark H. Duesenberg — 55

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, 2008

Benjamin J. Schlater — 41

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 2016

Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategy, 2015

Treasurer and head of corporate development, strategic and financial planning and risk management, Veyance Technologies, a global manufacturing company, 2007

17


PART II

Item 5 — Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol FOE. On January 31, 2017 , we had 901 shareholders of record for our common stock, and the closing price of the common stock was $ 14.14 per share.

The chart below compares Ferro’s cumulative total shareholder return for the fi ve years ended December 31, 2016 , to that of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the Standard & Poor’s MidCap Specialty Chemicals Index. In all cases, the information is presented on a dividend-reinvested basis and assumes investment of $100.00 on December 31, 2011 . At December 31, 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $14.33 per share.

COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR

CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURNS

Picture 2

The quarterly high and low intra-day sales prices and dividends declared per share for our common stock during 2016 and 2015 were as follows:









2016

2015



High

Low

Dividends

High

Low

Dividends

First Quarter

$

12.76

$

8.47

$

$

13.49

$

11.11

$

Second Quarter

14.88

11.42

17.09

12.15

Third Quarter

14.70

11.80

17.07

10.75

Fourth Quarter

16.17

12.46

13.30

10.06

The restrict ive covenants contained in our C redit F acility limit the amount of dividends we can pay on our common stock. For further discussion, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

18


The Company’s Board of Directors approved share repurchase programs, under which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock on the open market, including through a Rule 10b5-1 plan, or in privately negotiated transactions.



The Company repurchased 1,175, 437 shares of common stock at an average price of $9. 72 per share for a total cost of $11.4 million during 2016.  Under the share repurchase programs, the Company has repurchased an aggregate of 4,458,345 shares of common stock, at an average price of $11. 21 per share, for a total cost of $50.0 million.  As of December 31, 2016 , $50.0 million may still be purchased under the programs.

The following table summarizes purchases of our common stock by the Company and affiliated purchasers during the three months ended December 31, 2016 :













Total Number

Maximum Dollar



of Shares

Amount that



Purchased as

May Yet Be



Total Number

Average

Part of Publicly

Purchased



of Shares

Price Paid

Announced Plans

Under the Plans



Purchased

per Share

or Programs

or Programs



(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

October 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016

$

$

50,000,000

November 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016

$

$

50,000,000

December 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

$

$

50,000,000

Total







Item 6 — Selected Financial Data

The following table presents selected financial data for the last five years ended December 31st:











2016

2015

2014

2013

2012



(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)



Net sales

$

1,145,292

$

1,075,341

$

1,111,626

$

1,188,582

$

1,267,695

Income (loss) from continuing operations

44,577

99,883

(8,609)

63,905

(386,104)

Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders

0.52

1.16

(0.10)

0.73

(4.49)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders

0.51

1.14

(0.10)

0.72

(4.49)

Cash dividends declared per common shares

-

-

-

-

-

Total assets

1,283,769

1,225,351

1,091,554

1,004,781

1,074,841

Long-term debt, including current portion

563,033

470,805

302,383

265,226

293,915

In 2015, we adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03.  The ASU requires debt issuance costs for term loans to be presented in the balance sheet as a reduction of the related debt liability rather than an asset. The adoption resulted in the reclassificatio n of $5.3 million, $3.4 million and $4.3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the term loan from Total assets to a reduction in Long-term debt, including current portion within the financial data abov e as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

In 2014, we commenced a process to market for sale all of the assets in our Polymer Additives reportable segment.  During 2014, we sold substantially all of the assets related to our North America-based Polymer Additives business, which is presented as discontinued operations in 2012 through 2014. In 2016, we completed the disposition of the Europe-based Polymer Additives business, which is presented as discontinued operations in 2012 through 2016 .

In 2014, we sold substantially all of the assets in our Specialty Plastics business, which is presented as discontinued operations in 2012 through 2014.

In 2013, we sold our Pharmaceuticals business, which is presented as discontinued o perations in 2012 through 2013.

19


Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

During the year ended December 31, 2016 , net sales increased $70.0 million, or 6.5% , compared with 2015 . The increase was driven by an increase in sales in Pigme nts, Powders and Oxides of $81.6 mi llion, partially offset by a decrease in sales in Performance Coatings of $6.4 million and Performance Colo rs and Glass of $5.3 million. G ross profit increased $49.5 million compared with 2015 .  As a percentage of net sales , gross profit rate increased approximately 260 basis points to 30.7% , from 28.1% in the prior year.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 , selling, general and administrative (“SG&A” ) expenses increased $24.8 million, or 11.4% , compared with 2015 , primarily driven by the increase in expense in pension and other postretirement benefits of $ 14.9 million .

For the year ended December 31, 2016 , net loss was $19.9 million, compared with net income of $63.1 million in 2015 , and net loss attributable to common shareholders was $20.8 million, compared with net income attributable to common shareholders of $64.1 million in 2015 . Income from continuing operations was $44.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 , compared with income from continuing operations of $99.9 million in 2015 .



2016 Transactional Activity

Business Acquisitions

Acquisition of Cappelle: As discussed in Note 4, in the fourth quarter of 2016 , the Company acquired 100% of the share capital of Belgium-based Cappelle Pigments NV (“Cappelle”), a leader in specialty, high-performance inorganic and organic pigments used in coating s , inks and plastics, for €40 . 0 million (approximately $42.4 million).

Acquisition of ESL: As discussed in Note 4, in the fourth quarter of 2016 , the Company acquired 100% of the membership interest of Electro-Science Laboratories , Inc. (“ESL”), a leader in electronic packaging materials for $78.0 million.

Acquisition of Delta Performance Products: As discussed in Note 4, in the third quarter of 2016, the Company acquired certain assets of Delta Performance Products, LLC, for a cash purchase price of $4.4 million.

Acquisition of Pinturas: As discussed in Note 4, in the second quarter of 2016, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of privately held Pinturas Benicarló, S.L. (“Pinturas”) for €16.5 million in cash (approximately $18.4 million).

Acquisition of Ferer: As discussed in Note 4, in the first quarter of 2016, the Company completed the purchase of 100% of the equity of privately held Istanbul-based Ferer Dis Ticaret Ve Kimyasallar Anonim Sirketi A.S. (“Ferer”) for approximately $9.4 million in cash.

Disposition of the Europe-based Polymer Additives business

As discussed in Note 3, in the third quarter of 2016, the Company completed the disposition of the Europe-based Polymer Additives business to Plahoma Two AG, an affiliate of the LIVIA Group.

Outlook

The Company delivered strong performance throughout 2016.  Sales increased 6.5% primarily due to acquisitions acquired within the last year.  In addition, gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, increased to 30.7% from 28.1%.  Partially offsetting the higher gross profit were increased SG&A costs, primarily driven by an increase in pension and postretirement benefits expense and incentive compensation expense. Our effective tax ra te for 2016 was 28.6 %.

For 2017 , we expec t gro ss margin will continue to improve .  W e anticipate benefitting from strategic actions taken to improve growth in our core businesses and will continue to benefit from recent acquisitions. Raw material costs are expected to increase in 2017 , however ou r expectation is to offset these cost increases through pricing actions, product reformulations and optimization actions . In addition, foreign currency exchange rates continue to be volatile, and we anticipate changes in rates will adversely impact reported results.

20


We remain focused on the integration of our recent acquisitions and continue to work toward achieving the identified synergies.  We will continue to focus on opportunities to optimize our cost structure and make our business processes and systems more efficient, and to leverage tax planning opportunities.  We continue to expect cash flow from operating activities to be positive for 2017 , providing additional liquidity.



21


Results of Operations - Consolidated

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

For the year ended December 31, 2016 , income from continuing operations was $44.6 million, compared with income from continuing operations of $99.9 million in 2015 . For the year ended December 31, 2016 , net loss was $19.9 million, compared with net income of $63.1 million in 2015 . For the year ended December 31, 2016 , net loss attributable to common shareholders was $20.8 million, or $0.25 loss per share, compared with net income attributable to common shareholders of $64.1 million, or $0.74 earnings per share in 2015 .

Net Sales











2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Net sales

$

1,145,292

$

1,075,341

$

69,951

6.5

%

Cost of sales

794,075

773,661

20,414

2.6

%

Gross profit

$

351,217

$

301,680

$

49,537

16.4

%

Gross profit as a % of net sales

30.7

%

28.1

%



Net sales increased by $70.0 million, or 6.5% , in the year ended December 31, 2016 , compared with the prior year. The n et sales increas e was driven by higher sal es in Pig me nts, Powders and Oxides of $81.6 mi llion, partially offset by a decrease in sales in Performance Colors and Glass of $5.3 million and Performance Coatings of $6.4 million .  The increase in net sales was primarily driven by the sales from Nubiola of $66.3 million and sales from Al Salomi of $22.1 million , partially offset by a decrease in sales of frits an d glazes from Latin America of $23.9 million.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased $49.5 million, or 16.4% , in 2016 to $351.2 million, compared with $301.7 million in 2015 and , as a percentage of net sales , it increased 260 basis points to 30.7% . The significant driver of the increased gross profit was strong performance in our Pigments, Powders and Oxides segment which exceede d prior- year gross profit by $38.6 milli on, primarily driven by sales from Nubiola. The i ncrease in gross profit was primarily due to an increase in sales vol umes and mix of $48.6 million, decreases in raw material costs of $21.0 million and decreases in m anufacturing costs of $11.1 million, partially offset by unfa vorable product pricing of $15.0 million and unfavorabl e foreign currency impacts of $9.1 million.

G eographic Revenues

The following table presents our sales on the basis of where sales originated.









2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Geographic Revenues on a sales origination basis

Europe

$

515,055

$

474,400

$

40,655

8.6

%

United States

300,187

281,976

18,211

6.5

%

Asia Pacific

179,464

161,027

18,437

11.4

%

Latin America

150,586

157,938

(7,352)

(4.7)

%

Net sales

$

1,145,292

$

1,075,341

$

69,951

6.5

%



The increase in net sales of $70.0 million, compared with 2015 , was driven by increased sales from Europe, Asia Pacific and the United States , pa rtially mitigat ed by a decrease in sales from Latin America . The increase from Europe was primarily attrib utable to Nubiola sales of $24.6 million and an increase in P erformance Coatings sales of $11.2 million a nd the increase from Asia Pacific was attributable to an increase in sales in all segments. The increase from the United S tates was attributable to an increase in sales in Pigments, Powders and Oxides of $29.4 million, pa rt ially offset by lower sales in Per formance Colors and Glass of $11.5 m illion. The decrease in sales from Lat in America was attributable to the sale of our interest in an operating affiliate in Venezuela in 2015 which contributed $8.4 million in net sales .

22


The follow ing table presents our sales on the basis of where sold products were shipped.









2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Geographic Revenues on a shipped-to basis

Europe

$

501,231

$

466,861

$

34,370

7.4

%

Asia Pacific

244,057

220,806

23,251

10.5

%

United States

239,771

213,531

26,240

12.3

%

Latin America

160,233

174,143

(13,910)

(8.0)

%

Net sales

$

1,145,292

$

1,075,341

$

69,951

6.5

%



Selling, General and Administrative Expense

The following table includes SG&A components with significant changes between 2016 and 2015 .









2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Personnel expenses

$

119,785

$

114,386

$

5,399

4.7

%

Business development

12,890

13,527

(637)

(4.7)

%

Stock-based compensation

7,245

8,868

(1,623)

(18.3)

%

Incentive compensation

10,852

4,982

5,870

117.8

%

Pension and other postretirement benefits

16,417

1,494

14,923

998.9

%

Bad debt

1,383

667

716

107.3

%

All other expenses

73,130

72,975

155

0.2

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

$

241,702

$

216,899

$

24,803

11.4

%

SG&A expenses were $24.8 million higher in 2016 compared with the prior year . As a percentage of net sales , SG&A expenses increased 90 basis points from 20.2 % in 2015 to 21.1 % in 201 6 . The most si gnificant driver of the increase in SG&A expenses in 2016 was the change in the mark-to-market loss and curtailment and settlement effects on our defined benefit pension plans and postretirement health care and lif e insurance be nefit plans of $8.1 million, and is included within the pension and other postretirement benefits line above. The expense in 2016 was higher than the prior year due to the loss from expected returns on plan assets exceeding actual returns and a decrease in the discount rate compared with the prior ye ar . Excluding the impacts of the pension and other postretirement benefits expense, SG&A expenses decreased 30 basis points from 20.0% in 2015 to 19.7% in 2016 . The increase in personnel expenses was attributable to the acquisitions acquired which contributed $5.5 million and the in crease in incentive compensation was a result of the Company’s performance relative to targets for certain awards compared with the prior year .

The following table presents SG&A expenses attributable to sales, research and development , and operations costs as strategic services and presents other SG&A costs as functional services .











2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Strategic services

$

116,807

$

107,729

$

9,078

8.4

%

Functional services

106,798

95,320

11,478

12.0

%

Incentive compensation

10,852

4,982

5,870

117.8

%

Stock-based compensation

7,245

8,868

(1,623)

(18.3)

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

$

241,702

$

216,899

$

24,803

11.4

%



SG&A e xpenses were $24.8 million higher in 2016, compared with 2015.  The increase in SG&A expenses was driven by higher expenses in functional services due to the increase in pension and other postretirement benefit expense. The increase in strategic expenses was due to the increased expenses of $8.7 million associated with the acquisitions acq uired within the last year and an in crease in bad debt expense of $0.7 million in 2016, compared with 2015.

23


Restructuring and Impairment Charges











2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Employee severance

$

1,353

$

4,015

$

(2,662)

(66.3)

%

Goodwill impairment

13,198

13,198

NM

%

Other restructuring costs

1,356

5,640

(4,284)

(76.0)

%

Restructuring and impairment charges

$

15,907

$

9,655

$

6,252

64.8

%

Restructuring and impairment charges increased by $6.3 million in 2016 , compared with 2015 . The increase was driven by an impairment charge within our Tile Coating Systems reporting unit, a component of our Performance Coatings operating segment in 2016 of $13.2 million. This increase was partially mitigated by a decrease in employee severance cost of $2.7 million in 2016 , compa red with 2015 and the early termination cost of a contract associated with restructuring a corporate function of $2.8 million in 2015 .

Interest Expense









2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Interest expense

$

20,246

$

15,464

$

4,782

30.9

%

Amortization of bank fees

1,353

1,125

228

20.3

%

Interest capitalization

(52)

(1,426)

1,374

(96.4)

%

Interest expense

$

21,547

$

15,163

$

6,384

42.1

%

Interest expense in 2016 in creased $6.4 million compared with 2015 , primarily due to an increase in the average long-term d ebt balance for the 2016 period compared with 2015 , as well as less interest capitalization associated with long-term capital projects , which was driven by the substantial completion of the Antwerp, Belgium facility in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Income Tax Expense

In 2016 , we recorded an income tax expense of $17.9 million, or 28.6 % of income before income taxes, compared to an income tax benefit of $45.1 million, or (82.3%) of income before income taxes in 2015 .  The 2016 effective tax rate is less than the statutory income tax rate of 35% , primarily as a result of a $5.5 million benefit related to greater levels of income earned in lower tax jurisdictions, $4.8 million net benefit for the release of valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets that were utilized in the current year, $2.0 million in net benefit for the release of valuation allowances, which are deemed no longer necessary based upon changes in the current and expected future years operating profits , $1.8 million benefit related to notional interest deductions, $2.8 million benefit for the generation of tax credits offset by a $4.1 million expense related to the impairment of book basis goodwill and a $2.1 million expense related to non-deductible expenses . The 2015 effective tax rate was less than the statutory income tax rate of 35% primarily as a result of a $3.8 million benefit related to greater levels of income earned in lower tax jurisdictions, $3.1 million benefit for the release of the valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets that wer e utilized in the current year and $63.3 million benefit for the release of valuation allowances in certain jurisdictions, which are deemed no longer necessary based upon a change from a cumulative three-year loss to income and our expectation of sufficient future taxable income to be able to realize the respective benefits , offset by $2.4 million expense related to ne w uncertain tax positions and $1.7 million expense related to non-deductible expenses .

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

For the year ended December 31, 2015 , income from continuing operations was $ 99.9 million, compared with a loss from continuing operations of $ 8.6 million in 2014 . For the year ended December 31, 2015 , net income was $63.1 million, compared with net income of $86.2 million in 2014 . For the year ended December 31, 2015 , net income attributable to common shareholders was $64.1 million, or $0.74 earnings per share, compared with net income attributable to common shareholders of $86.1 million, or $0.99 earnings per share in 2014 .

24


Net Sales









2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Net sales

$

1,075,341

$

1,111,626

$

(36,285)

(3.3)

%

Cost of sales

773,661

826,541

(52,880)

(6.4)

%

Gross profit

$

301,680

$

285,085

$

16,595

5.8

%

Gross profit as a % of net sales

28.1

%

25.6

%

Net sales decreased by $ 36.3 million, or 3.3 % in the year ended December 31, 2015 , compared with the prior year. Net sales decreased $36.3 million, primarily driven by a decrease in sales in Performance Coatings and Performance Colors an d Glass of $55.2 million and $30.9 million, respectively, partially mitigated by an increase in net sales in Pigments, Powders and Oxides of $ 49.8 million. The main driver of the decrease in net sales was unfavorable foreign currency impacts, which totaled approximately $132.4 million, and unfavorable pricing impacts of $16.6 million, partially mitigated by $56.9 million of sales from Nubiola, which was acquired in the third quarter of 2015, and $56.0 million of sales from Vetriceramici, which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2014 .

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased $16.6 million, or 5.8 % in 2015 to $301.7 million , compared with $285.1 million in 2014 and as a percentage of net sales , it increased 250 basis points to 28 .1%. The significant driver of the increased gross profit was strong performance in our Pigments, Powders and Oxides segment which exceeded prior-year gross profit by $17.2 million, primarily driven by Nubiola, which was acquired in the third quarter of 2015.  Gross profit was negatively impacted by a charge of $5.8 million related to a purchase price adjustment f rom the acquisition of Nubiola , for step up of inventory acquired and subsequently sold in the third quarter that will not recur.

G eographic Revenues

The following table presents our sales on the basis of where sales originated.









2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Geographic Revenues on a sales origination basis

Europe

$

474,400

$

499,045

$

(24,645)

(4.9)

%

United States

281,976

263,452

18,524

7.0

%

Asia Pacific

161,027

188,099

(27,072)

(14.4)

%

Latin America

157,938

161,030

(3,092)

(1.9)

%

Net sales

$

1,075,341

$

1,111,626

$

(36,285)

(3.3)

%

The decline in net sales of $36.3 million, compared with 2014 , was driven by decreased sales from Europe, Asia Pacific and Latin America, partially mitigated by an increas e in sales from the United States. The decline in sales from Eu rope was due to lower sales in Performance Colors and Glass an d Performance Coatings of $23.0 million and $18.7 million, respectively, and was largely due to unfavorable foreign currency impacts. T he decrease from Europe was partially m itigated by increased sales in Pig ments, Powders and Oxides of $17.1 million, driven by sales from Nubiola, which was acquired in the third quarter of 2015. The decline from Asia Pacific was driven by lower sales of $22.6 million in Performance Coatings , lower sales of $4.5 million in Performance Colors and Glass and the result of the sale of our North American and Asian metal powders business, which comprised $7.5 million of t he decrease.  The lower sales from Latin America was due to lower sales in Performance Coatings and Performance Colors and Glass of $8.9 million and $7.4 million, respectively, partia ll y mitigated by higher sales in Pigments, Powders and Oxides of $13.2 million. The decline in sales from Latin America in Performance Coatings was primarily due to the unfavorable foreign currency impacts related to the change in currency exchange mechanisms in Venezuela during the first quarter of 2015 and the sale of our operating affiliate in Venezuela in the fourth quarte r of 2015. The higher sales from the United States in 2015 compared to 2014, was driven by higher sales volumes within Pigments, Powders and Oxides and Performance Colors and Glass, pa rt ially offset by lower sales in Performance Coatings.

25


The following table presents our sales on the basis of where sold products were shipped.











2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Geographic Revenues on a shipped-to basis

Europe

$

466,861

$

489,019

$

(22,158)

(4.5)

%

Asia Pacific

220,806

231,348

(10,542)

(4.6)

%

United States

213,531

205,456

8,075

3.9

%

Latin America

174,143

185,803

(11,660)

(6.3)

%

Net sales

$

1,075,341

$

1,111,626

$

(36,285)

(3.3)

%







Selli ng, General and Administrative Expense

The following table includes SG&A components with significant changes between 2015 and 2014.











2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Personnel expenses

$

114,386

$

107,159

$

7,227

6.7

%

Business development

13,527

3,468

10,059

290.1

%

Stock-based compensation

8,868

9,679

(811)

(8.4)

%

Incentive compensation

4,982

11,598

(6,616)

(57.0)

%

Pension and other postretirement benefits

1,494

85,081

(83,587)

(98.2)

%

Bad debt

667

2,657

(1,990)

(74.9)

%

All other expenses

72,975

67,120

5,855

8.7

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

$

216,899

$

286,762

$

(69,863)

(24.4)

%



SG&A expenses were $69.9 million lower in 2015 compared with the prior year. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses decreased 560 basis points from 25.8% in the prior year to 20.2% in 2015 . The most significant driver of the decrease in SG&A expenses in 2015 was the change in the mark-to-market loss and curtailment and settlement effects on our defined benefit pension plans and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans of $80.3 million, and is included within the pension and other postretirement benefits line above. The expense in 2014 was primarily related to changes in actuarial assumptions used in calculating the value of the U.S. pension liability. In addition, during 2014, the Company adopted the use of new mortality tables within its calculation assumptions, which had a one-time impact of increasing the liability.  The new mortality tables reflect underlying increases in life expectancy of participants, thus driving longer benefit payment periods. The impact of the change in mortality assumption on the U.S. pension liability was an increase of the liability of approximately $18 million. Excluding the impacts of the pension and other postretirement benefits expense , SG&A expenses increased 190 basis points from 18.1% in 2014 to 20.0% in 2015. Included in SG&A expenses were $8.1 million and $12.5 million of expenses attributable to Nubiola and Vetriceramici, which were acquired in the third quarter of 2015 and the fourth quarter of 2014, respectively. The increase in business development costs of $10.1 million was a result of higher costs associated with professional fees that were related to business development activities. These increases were offset by lower incentive compensation expense of $6.6 million, which is based on certain performance metrics, and lower bad debt expenses of $2.0 million.  The decrease in SG&A is also a result of foreign currency impacts.



26


The following table presents SG&A expenses attributable to sales, research and development and operations costs as strategic services and other SG&A expenses as functional services.











2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Strategic services

$

107,729

$

101,296

$

6,433

6.4

%

Functional services

95,320

164,189

(68,869)

(41.9)

%

Incentive compensation

4,982

11,598

(6,616)

(57.0)

%

Stock-based compensation

8,868

9,679

(811)

(8.4)

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

$

216,899

$

286,762

$

(69,863)

(24.4)

%

SG&A expenses were $69.1 million lower in 2015, compared with 2014.  The decrease in SG &A expenses was driven by lower expenses in functional services from the change in the mark-to-market loss and curtailment and settlement effects on our defined benefit pension plans and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans of $80.3 million, partially offset by an increase in business development expenses of $10.1 million. Lower SG&A expenses were also driven by lower incentive and stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by higher expenses in strategic services driven by the Vetriceramici and Nubiola acquisitions.

Restructuring and Impairment Charges











2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Employee severance

$

4,015

$

2,744

$

1,271

46.3

%

Lease termination costs

2,468

(2,468)

100.0

%

Other restructuring costs

5,640

3,637

2,003

55.1

%

Restructuring and impairment charges

$

9,655

$

8,849

$

806

9.1

%



Restructuring and impairment charges increased in 2015 compared with 2014. The primary drivers were the increase in employee severance cost of $1.3 million in 2015 compared with 2014 and the early termination cost of a contract associated with restructuring a corporate function of $2.8 million during in 2015. The increase in restructuring and impairment charges was partially mitigated by a decrease of $2.5 million due to a lease termination charge that occurred in 2014.

Interest Expense









2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Interest expense

$

15,464

$

16,895

$

(1,431)

(8.5)

%

Amortization of bank fees

1,125

1,337

(212)

(15.9)

%

Interest capitalization

(1,426)

(1,969)

543

(27.6)

%

Interest expense

$

15,163

$

16,263

$

(1,100)

(6.8)

%



Interest expen se in 2015 decreased $1.1 million compared with 2014, primarily due to the redemption of the 7.875% Senior Notes and refinancing of the 2013 Revolving Credit Facility during the third quarter of 2014.  The decrease was partially offset by less interest capitalization associated with long-term capital projects , which was driven by the substantial completion of the Antwerp, Belgium facility in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Income Tax Expense

In 2015, we recorded an income tax benefit of $45.1 million, or (82.3%) of income before income taxes, compared to an income tax benefit of $34.2 million, or 79.9% of loss before taxes in 2014. The 2015 effective tax rate was less than the statutory income tax rate of 35% primarily as a result of $3.8 million benefit related to greater levels of income earned in lower tax jurisdictions, a $3.1 million benefit for the release of the valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets that we re utilized in the current year and $63.3 million benefit for the release of valuation allowances in certain jurisdictions, which are deemed no longer necessary based upon a

27


change from a cumulative three-year loss to income and our expectation of sufficient future taxable income to be able to realize the respective benefits , offset by $2.4 million expense related to ne w uncertain tax positions and $1.7 million expense related to non-deductible expenses .  The 2014 effective tax rate was greater than the statutory income tax rate of 35% primarily as a result of a $17.4 million benefit related to the release of valuation allowances for deferred tax assets that were utilized in the 2014, the release of valuation allowances deemed no longer necessary and the expiration of fully valued tax attributes, $15.2 million of benefit related to 2014 domestic foreign tax credit generated and utilized, and foreign tax rate differences from the statutory income tax rate of 35%.

Results of Operations - Segment Information

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

Performance Coatings















Change due to



Volume /



2016

2015

$ Change

% Change

Price

Mix

Currency

Other



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales

$

526,981

$

533,370

$

(6,389)

(1.2)

%

$

(15,923)

43,979

(34,445)

$

Segment gross profit

139,454

126,945

12,509

9.9

%

(15,923)

23,181

(7,265)

12,516

Gross profit as a % of segment net sales

26.5

%

23.8

%



Net sales declined in Performance Coatings compared with 2015 , primarily driven by a decreas e in sales of $20.9 million in frits and glazes, and $8.4 millio n due to the sale of our Venez uela business , partially mitigated by $22.1 million in sales from Al Salomi.  The decrease in net sales was impacted by unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $3 4.4 million and lower product pricing of $15.9 million, partially offset by increased sales volume and mix of $44 .0 million . Gross profit increased $12 .5 million from 2015 , primarily driven by lower manufacturing costs of $4 .6 million, hig he r sales volumes and mix of $23.2 million, and lower raw material costs of $7.9 million, partially offset by unfavorable product pricing impacts of $15.9 million and unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $7.3 million.











2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales by Region

Europe

$

289,780

$

278,581

$

11,199

4.0

%

Latin America

101,565

123,152

(21,587)

(17.5)

%

Asia Pacific

89,573

85,850

3,723

4.3

%

United States

46,063

45,787

276

0.6

%

Net sales

$

526,981

$

533,370

$

(6,389)

(1.2)

%



The net sales decrease of $6.4 m illion was driven by declines in sales from Latin America, partially mitiga ted by an increase in sales from Europe, Asia Pacific and the United States .  The sales decline from Latin America included a decrease in sales in frits and glazes of $23.9 million and a decrease in sales from Venezuela of $8.4 million , partially mitigated by increased sales in digital inks and opacifiers of $5.7 million and $5.3 million, respect ively.  The increase in sales from Europe was primary attributable to $22.1 million in sales from Al Salomi, partially offset by decreased sales in digital inks and Vetriceramic i products of $5.7 million and $4.6 million , respectively.  The increase from Asia Pacific was primarily due to increased sales in digital i nks and frits and glazes of $2.7 million and $2.5 million, partially offset by decreased sales in porcelain enamel of $1.3 million. The increase from the United States was fully attributable to increased sales in porcelain enamel of $0.3 million.



28


Performance Colors and Glass











Change due to



Volume /



2016

2015

$ Change

% Change

Price

Mix

Currency

Other



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales

$

371,464

$

376,769

$

(5,305)

(1.4)

%

$

587

$

(951)

$

(4,941)

$

Segment gross profit

133,716

128,209

5,507

4.3

%

587

(3,224)

(1,636)

9,780

Gross profit as a % of segment net sales

36.0

%

34.0

%



Net sales decreased compared with 2015 , primarily driven by lower sales of our electronics products and industrial products of $3.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Net sales were impacted by unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $4.9 million and u nfavorable volume and mix of $1.0 million , partially mitigated by high er product pricing of $0.6 million. Gross profit increased from 2015 , primarily due t o lower raw material costs of $7.9 million, l ower manufacturing costs of $1.9 million an d higher product pricing of $0.6 million, partially offset by l ower sales volumes and mix of $3.2 million and unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $1.6 million.











2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales by Region

Europe

$

160,475

$

157,174

$

3,301

2.1

%

United States

132,432

143,919

(11,487)

(8.0)

%

Asia Pacific

59,121

56,082

3,039

5.4

%

Latin America

19,436

19,594

(158)

(0.8)

%

Net sales

$

371,464

$

376,769

$

(5,305)

(1.4)

%



The net sales decline of $5.3 million was driven by lower sal es from the United States and Latin America, partially mitigated by increased sales from Europe and Asia P acific. The decrease in sales from the United States was attributable to lower sales across all product lines, and the decline in sales from Latin America was primarily due to low er sales of decoration products of $0 .2 millio n.  The increase in sales from Europe was partially attributable to increased s ales of electronics and automobile products of $2.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in sales in industrial products of $0.9 million .  The increase in sales from Asia Pacific was primarily due to higher sale s of automotive products of $3.4 million, partially offset by lower sale s in decoration products of $0.3 million.

Pigments, Powders and Oxides











Change due to



Volume /



2016

2015

$ Change

% Change

Price

Mix

Currency

Other



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales

$

246,847

$

165,202

$

81,645

49.4

%

$

368

82,100

(823)

$

Segment gross profit

84,293

45,678

38,615

84.5

%

368

28,615

(186)

9,818

Gross profit as a % of segment net sales

34.1

%

27.6

%



29


Net sales increased compared with 2 015 , primarily due to higher sale s from Nubiola products of $66.3 million , an increase in sales of surface technology products and of pigments of $6.1 million and $5.7 million, respectively , and an increase in sales from Cappelle of $2.2 million .  Net sales were positively impacted by higher volumes and mix of $82.1 million and f avorable product pricing of $0.4 million, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $0.8 million.  Gross profit increased from 2015 , primarily due to hig her sales volumes and mix of $ 28.6 million, fa vorable raw material costs of $5.2 million, lower manufacturing costs of $4 .6 million and f avorable product pricing of $0.4 million, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $0.2 million. Gross profit was negatively impacted by a charge of $5.8 million in 2015, related to a purchase price adjustment from the acquisition of Nubiola for step up of inventory acquired an d subsequently sold that will not recur.











2016

2015

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales by Region

United States

$

121,692

$

92,270

$

29,422

31.9

%

Europe

64,800

38,645

26,155

67.7

%

Asia Pacific

30,770

19,095

11,675

61.1

%

Latin America

29,585

15,192

14,393

94.7

%

Net sales

$

246,847

$

165,202

$

81,645

49.4

%

The increase in net sales of $81.6 million compared with 2015 was due to higher sales across all re gions.  The increase in sales from the Unite d States was driven by increased sales from Nuiobla of $17.7 million and in creased sales in surface technology and pigments of $6.1 million and $3.6 million , respectively . The increase in sales from Europe and Latin America was dri ven by sales from Nubiola of $24.6 million and $14.6 million, respect ively.  The increase in sales from Asia Pacific was primarily driv en by sales from Nubiola of $9.3 million and pigments of $2.5 million .

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

Performance Coatings











Change due to



Volume /



2015

2014

$ Change

% Change

Price

Mix

Currency

Other



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales

$

533,370

$

588,538

$

(55,168)

(9.4)

%

$

(19,411)

$

55,049

$

(90,806)

$

Segment gross profit

126,945

131,043

(4,098)

(3.1)

%

(19,411)

15,053

(18,667)

18,927

Gross profit as a % of segment net sales

23.8

%

22.3

%



Net sales decreased in Performance Coatings compared with 2014 due to lower sales of frits and glazes, colors, porcelain enamels, digital inks and other tile product lines of $54.3 million, $17.9 million, $17.8 million, $12.8 million and $6.9 million, respectively. The sales decline was partially mitigated by an increase of $54.5 million in sales from Vetriceramici, which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2014.  A substantial portion of the decline in sales was attributed to unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $90.8 million and lower product pricing of $19.4 million, partially mitigated by favorable mix and higher sales volumes of $22.7 million and $32.3 million, respectively. Gross profit decreased from 2014, and was driven by lower product pricing impacts of $19.4 million and unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $18.7 million, partially mitigated by favorable volume and mix of $ 15.1 million, lower manufacturing costs of $11.1 million and favorable raw material impacts of $7.8 million.

30












2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales by Region

Europe

$

278,581

$

297,324

$

(18,743)

(6.3)

%

Latin America

123,152

132,015

(8,863)

(6.7)

%

Asia Pacific

85,850

108,419

(22,569)

(20.8)

%

United States

45,787

50,780

(4,993)

(9.8)

%

Net sales

$

533,370

$

588,538

$

(55,168)

(9.4)

%

The net sales decrease of $55.2 million compared with 2014 reflected lower sales in all regions.  The decline from Asia Pacific was driven by lower sales of frits and glaze products, digital inks, porcelain enamels, and colors of $12.4 million, $4.0 million, $3.3 million, and $2.9 million respe ctively. The decline in sales from Europe was attributable to lower sales of our porcelain enamel products, partially mitigated by higher sales of tile products, including Vetriceramici sales. The de cline in sale s from Latin America compared to 2014 was due to lower sales in colors and porcelain enamel products, partially mitigated by higher sales of digit al inks products. The decline from the United States was attributable to porcelain enamel products .

Performance Colors and Glass











Change due to



Volume /



2015

2014

$ Change

% Change

Price

Mix

Currency

Other



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales

$

376,769

$

407,674

$

(30,905)

(7.6)

%

$

2,451

$

2,707

$

(36,063)

$

Segment gross profit

128,209

134,964

(6,755)

(5.0)

%

2,451

(6,798)

(12,278)

9,870

Gross profit as a % of segment net sales

34.0

%

33.1

%



Net sales decreased $30.9 million in 2015 compared with 2014, with d ecreases of $18.0 million in decoration, $6.4 million in industrial products, $7.1 million in automotive, and $0.9 million in electronics, partially mitigated by an increase in sales of $1.5 million from Vetriceramici, which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2014. Net sales reflected unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $36.1 million and lower sales volume of $5.3 million, partially mitigated by favorable mix of $8.0 million and higher product pricing of $2.5 million. Gross profit decreased from 2014, due to unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $12.3 million, unfavorable sales volumes and mix of $6.8 million, and higher manufacturing costs of $1.0 million, partially mitigated by favorable raw material impacts of $10.9 million and higher product pricing impacts of $2.5 million.











2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales by Region

Europe

$

157,174

$

180,175

$

(23,001)

(12.8)

%

United States

143,919

139,937

3,982

2.8

%

Asia Pacific

56,082

60,537

(4,455)

(7.4)

%

Latin America

19,594

27,025

(7,431)

(27.5)

%

Net sales

$

376,769

$

407,674

$

(30,905)

(7.6)

%

The decrease in net sales of $30.9 million compared with 2014, was primarily driven by lower sales in decoration pro ducts and industrial products from Europe of $8.0 million and $7.5 million, respectively, and lower sales of decoration products from Latin America and Asia Pacific of $8.3 million and $3.0 million.  The decrease was partially mitigated by higher sales in electronic s products from the Uni ted States of $4.0 million .

31


Pigments, Powders and Oxides











Change due to



Volume /



2015

2014

$ Change

% Change

Price

Mix

Currency

Other



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales

$

165,202

$

115,414

$

49,788

43.1

%

$

400

$

54,910

$

(5,522)

$

Segment gross profit

45,678

28,480

17,198

60.4

%

400

13,099

(1,250)

4,949

Gross profit as a % of segment net sales

27.6

%

24.7

%



Net sales increased compared with 2014, primarily due to higher volume and mix of $54.9 million, of which $56.9 million is related to sales from the Nubiola acquisition in the third quarter of 2015. The increase in sales is also due to favorable product pricing impacts of $0.4 million, partially mitigated by unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $5.5 million. Gross profit increased from 2014 and was a result of favorable volume and mix of $13.1 million, lower manufacturing costs of $3.6 million, favorable raw material impacts of $1.3 million, and higher product pricing of $0.4 million, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $1.2 million.  Gross profit was negatively impacted by a charge of $5.8 million related to a purchase price adjustment from the acquisition of Nubiola, which was acquired in the third quarter of 2015, for step up of inventory acquired and subsequently sold in the third quarter that will not recur.











2015

2014

$ Change

% Change



(Dollars in thousands)

Segment net sales by Region

United States

$

92,270

$

72,735

$

19,535

26.9

%

Europe

38,645

21,546

17,099

79.4

%

Asia Pacific

19,095

19,143

(48)

(0.3)

%

Latin America

15,192

1,990

13,202

663.4

%

Net sales

$

165,202

$

115,414

$

49,788

43.1

%

The increase in net sales of $49.8 million in 2015 compared with 2014 , was due to higher sales from the United States, Europe and Latin America . The increase in sales from the United States was driven by increases of $4.8 million in surface finishing products, $0.6 million in pigments, and $15.2 million by sales from Nubiola, which was acquired in the third quar ter of 2015, partially offset by a decrease in sales of $0.5 million in liquid coatings. The increase in sales from Europe and Latin America was driven by sales from Nubiola of $21.2 million and $13.7 million, r espectively, partially offset by a decrease in sales of $4.1 million and $0.5 million in pigments, respectively.

Summary of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 , and 2014











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

62,630

$

51,202

$

60,473

Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities

(150,822)

(244,600)

75,204

Net cash provided by (used for)  financing activities

81,997

119,726

(18,143)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

(6,603)

(8,448)

(5,362)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

$

(12,798)

$

(82,120)

$

112,172

Operating activities. Cash flows from operating activities increased $11.4 million in 2016 compared to 2015 . The increase was due to lower cash outflows for other assets and liabilities of $28.0 million and higher earnings after consideration of non-cash items of $30.4 million , partially offset by higher cash out flows for wor king capital of $43.2 million .

Cash fl ows from operating activities decreased $9.3 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . The change was driven by lower net income of $23.1 million. The decrease was partially mitigated by reduced payments associated with restructuring activities of $9.8 million and by a cash inflows of $12.2 million in 2015 related to working capital, compared to cash outflows of $12.3 million in 2014 .

32


Investing activities. Cash flows from investing activities increased approximately $93.8 million in 2016 . The increase was primarily due to lower cash outflows for business combinations of $ 72 .6 million and low er capital expenditures of $18.1 million which was driven by lower spend fo r the Antwerp, Belgium facility.  This facility was substantially completed in the fourth quarter of 2015 .

Cash flows from investing activities decreased appro ximately $319.8 million in 2015 compared with 2014 . The decrease was driven primarily by business acquisitio ns, net of cash acquired, of $202.2 million in 2015, compared to cash used for busin ess acquisitions in 2014 of $115.6 million, partially offset by net proceeds from the sales of our North America-based Polymer Additives assets and Specialty Plastics business in 2014 of $149.5 million and $88.3 million, respectively. Capital expenditures decreased $10.7 million in 2015 compared with 2014.

Financing activities. Cash flows from financing activities decreased $37.7 million in 2016 compared with 2015 , driven by the $50.0 million prepayment on the term loan facilit y that was made in January 2016 and a net borrowing decrease on the revolving credit facility of $28.4 million, partially mitigated by decreased purchase of treasury stock of $27.1 million and an increase in net bo rrowings on loans payable of $11.9 million .

Cash flows from fi nancing activities i ncreased $137.9 million in 2015 compared with 2014 . The increase was primarily the result of net borrowings on the revolving credit facility of $170.0 million in 2015 compared to a repayment of $9.2 million in 2014. Net borrowings in 2015 were primarily used to fund acquisitions , the Company’s share repurchase program, and for other general business use. Further, we had a cash outflow of $41.0 million in 2014, related to repayment of debt outstanding under our accounts receivable securitization program , which expired during the year.

We have paid no dividends on our common stock since 2009.

33


Capital Resources and Liquidity

Major debt instruments that were outstanding during 2016 are described below.

Credit Facility

On July 31, 2014, the Company entered into a credit facility (the “ Cre dit Facility”) with a group of l enders to refinance the majority of its then outs tanding debt . The Credit Facility consisted of a $200 million secured revolving line of credit with a term of five years and a $300 million secured term loan facility with a term of seven years. On January 25, 2016, the Company amended the Credit Facility by entering into the Incremental Assumption Agreement (the “Incremental Agreement”) to increase the revolving line of credit commitment amount from $200 million to $300 million.  The Company then used a portion of the increase in the revolving line of credit to repay $50 million of the term loan facility. The Credit Facility was amended and a portion of the outstanding term loan was repaid to increase the amount of total liquidity available under the Credit Facility and reduce the total cost of borrowings. On August 29, 2016, the Company amended the Credit Facility by entering into the Second Incremental Assumption Agreement (the “Second Incremental Agreement”) to increase the revolving line of credit commitment amount to $400 million. The increase in the revolving l ine of credit commitment was used for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions .

Principal payments on the term loan facility of $0.75 million quarterly, are payable commencing December 31, 2014, with the remaining balance due on th e maturity date. At December 31 , 201 6, the Company had borrowed $243.3 million under the term loan facility, taking into account all prior quarterly payments and the $50 million prepayment that was made in January 2016, at an annual rate of 4.0%.  There are no additional borrowings available under the term loan facility.

Certain of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries have guaranteed the Comp any’s obligations under the Credit Facility and such obligations are secured by (a) substantially all of the personal property of the Company and the U.S. subsidiary guarantors and (b) a pledge of 100% of the stock of most of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries and 65% of most of the stock of the Company’s first tier foreign subsidiaries.

Interest Rate – Term Loan:  The interest rates applicable to the term loans will be, at the Company’s option, equal to either a base rate or a London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rate plus, in both cases, an applicable margin.

·

The base rate will be the highest of (i) the federal f unds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) syndication agent’s prime rate or (iii) the daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00%.

·

The applicable margin for base rate loans is 2.25%.

·

The LIBOR rate will be set as quoted by Bloomberg and shall not be less than 0.75%.

·

The applicable margin for LIBOR rate loans is 3.25%.

·

For LIBOR rate loans, the Company may choose to set the duration on individual borrowings for periods of one, two, three or six months, with the interest rate based on the applicable LIBOR rate for the corresponding duration.

Interest Rate – Revolving Credit Line:  The interest rates applicable to loans under the revolving credit line will be, at the Company’s option, equal to either a base rate or a LIBOR rate plus an applicable variable margin.  The variable margin will be based on the ratio of (a) the Company’s total consolidated debt outstanding at such time to (b) the Company’s consolidated EBITDA computed for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters most recently ended.

·

The base rate will be the highest of (i) the federal f unds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) syndication agent’s prime rate or (iii) the daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00%.

·

The applicable margin for base rate loans will vary between 1.50% and 2.00%.

·

The LIBOR rate will be set as quoted by Bloomberg for U.S. Dollars.

·

The applicable margin for LIBOR Rate Loans will vary between 2.50% and 3.00%.

·

For LIBOR rate loans, the Company may choose to set the duration on individual borrowings for periods of one, two, three or six months, with the interest rate based on the applicable LIBOR rate for the corresponding duration.



34


At December 31, 2016 , the Company had borrowed $311.6 millio n under the revolving credit facilities at a weighted average interest rate of 3.5 %.  The borrowing on the revolving credit line was used to fund the acquisitions, the share repurchase program s , and for other general business purposes . After reductions for outstanding letters of credit secured by these facilities, we had $ 84.1 million of additional borrowing s available under the revolving credit facilities at December 31, 2016 .

The Credit Facility contains customary restrictive covenants including, but not limited to, limitations on use of loan proceeds, limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock, limitations on acquisitions and dispositions, and limitations on certain types of investments.  The Credit Facility also contains standard provisions relating to conditions of borrowing and customary events of default, including the non-payment of obligations by the Company and the bankruptcy of the Company.

Specific to the revolving credit facility, the Company is subject to financial covenants regarding the Company’s outstanding net indebtedness and interest coverage ratios.

If an event of default occurs, all am ounts outstanding under the Credit Facility may be accelerated and become immediately due and p ayable. The Company was in compliance with our maximum leverage ratio covenant , as defined within our Credit Facility , as of September 30, 2016 . The financial covenants are not applicable as of December 31, 2016, due to the refinancing of the Credit Facility , which is described below .

On February 14, 2017, the Company entered into a new credit facility (the “ New Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders to refinanc e its outstanding Credit Facility and to provide liquidity for ongoing working capital requirements and general corporate purposes. The New Cred it Facility consists of a $400 million secured revolving line of credit with a term of five years, a $357.5 million secured term loan facility with a term of seven years and a €250 million secured euro term loan faci lity with a term of seven years.  Refer to Note 8 for further details on the New Credit Facility.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Consignment and Customer Arrangements for Precious Metals. We use precious metals, primarily silver, in the production of some of our products. We obtain most precious metals from financial institutions under consignment agreements (generally referred to as our precious metals consignment program). The financial institutions retain ownership of the precious metals and charge us fees based on the amounts we consign and the period of consignment. These fees were $ 0.8 million, $0.8 million and $0.8 million for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 respectively.  We had on hand precious metals owned by participants in our precious metals consignment program of $28.7 mill ion at December 31, 2016 and $20.5 million at December 31, 2015 , measured at fair value based on market prices for identical assets and net of credits.

The consignment agreements under our precious metals program involve short-term commitments that typically mature within 30 to 90 days of each transaction and are typically renewed on an ongoing basis. As a result, the Company relies on the continued willingness of financial institutions to participate in these arrangements to maintain this source of liquidity. On occasion, we have been required to deliver cash collateral. While no deposits were outstanding at December 31, 2016 , or December 31, 2015 , we may be required to furnish cash collateral in the future based on the quantity and market value of the precious metals under consignment and the amount of collateral-free lines provided by the financial institutions. The amount of cash collateral required is subject to review by the financial institutions and can be changed at any time at their discretion, based in part on their assessment of our creditworthiness.

Bank Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit.

At December 31, 2016 , the Company and its subsidiaries had bank guarantees and standby letters of credit issued by financial institutions that totaled $ 6 .4 million. These agreements primarily relate to Ferro’s insurance programs, foreign energy purchase contracts and foreign tax payments.

Other Financing Arrangements

We maintain other lines of credit to provide global flexibility for Ferro’s short-term liquidity requirements. These facilities are uncommitted lines for our international operations and totaled $7.3 million at December 31, 2016 . We had $6.7 million of additional borrowings available under these lines at December 31, 2016 .

35


Liquidity Requirements

Our primary sources of liquidity are available cash and cash equivalents, availabl e lines of credit under the Credit Facility, and cash flows from operating activities. As of December 31, 2016 , we had $45.6 million of cash and cash equivalents. Substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents were held by foreign subsidiaries. Cash generated in the U.S. is generally used to pay down amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes , including acquisitions . If needed, we could repatriate the majority of cash held by foreign subsidiaries without the need to accrue and pay U.S. income taxes. We do not anticipate a liquidity need requiring such repatriation of these funds to the U.S.

Our liquidity requirements primarily include debt service, purchase commitments, labor costs, working capital requirements, restructuring expenditures, capital investments, precious metals cash collateral requirements, and postretirement obligations. We expect to meet these requirements in the long term through cash provided by operating activities and availability under existing credit facilities or other financing arrangements. Cash flows from operating activities are primarily driven by earnings before noncash charges and changes in working capital needs . In 2016 , cash flows from financing and operating activities were used to fund our investing activities. Additionally, we used the borrowing s available under the Credit Facility to fund the acquisitions , the share repurchase program s , an d for other general business purposes . We had a dditional borrowing capacity $112.0 million at December 31, 2016 , available under various credit facilities, primarily our revolving credit facility.

Our credit facilities contain a number of restrictive covenants, including those described in more detail in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These covenants include customary operating restrictions, including, but not limited to, limitations on use of loan proceeds, limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock, limitations on acquisitions and dispositions, and limitations on certain types of investments. We are also subject to customary financial covenants under our credit facilities, including a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio. These covenants under our credit facilities restrict the amount of our borrowings, reducing our flexibility to fund ongoing operations and strategic initiatives. These facilities are described in more detail in “Capital Resources and Liquidity” under Item 7 and in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The most critical of these ratios is the leverage ratio for the revolving credit facility. The Company was in compliance with the covenant s , as defined within our Credit Facility , as of September 30, 2016 . The financial covenants are not applicable as of December 31, 2016 , due to the refinancing of the Credit Facility . Refer to Note 8 for further details on the New Credit Facility.

Difficulties experienced in global capital markets could affect the ability or willingness of counterparties to perform under our various lines of credit, forward contracts, and precious metals program. These counterparties are major, reputable, multinational institutions, all having inv estment-grade credit ratings, except for one, which is not rated . Accordingly, we do not anticipate counterparty default. However, an interruption in access to external financing could adversely affect our business prospects and financial condition.

We assess on an ongoing basis our portfolio of businesses, as well as our financial and capital structure, to ensure that we have sufficient capital and liquidity to meet our strategic objectives. As part of this process, from time to time we evaluate the possible divestiture of businesses that are not critical to our core strategic objectives and, where appropriate, pursue the sale of such businesses and assets such a s sales we completed in 2014 and 2016 . We also evaluate and pursue acquisition opportunities that we believe will enhance our strategic position such as the acquisitions we completed in 2016, 2015 and 2014 . Generally, we publicly announce material divestiture and acquisition transactions only when we have entered into definitive agreements relating to those transaction s.

36


Th e Company’s aggregate amount of contractual obligations for the next five years and thereafter is set forth below:









2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Thereafter

Totals

(Dollars in thousands)

Loans Payable (1)

$

11,452

$

$

$

$

$

$

11,452

Long-term debt (2)

6,105

5,612

316,813

4,601

232,176

2,634

567,941

Interest (3)

106

73

33

17

7

7

243

Operating lease obligations

8,435

5,966

5,193

3,825

2,645

4,398

30,462

Purchase commitments (4)

54,664

10,632

9,241

6,875

6,737

12,696

100,845

Taxes (5)

15,799

15,799

Retirement and other postemployment benefits (6)

9,590

9,411

19,001



$

106,151

$

31,694

$

331,280

$

15,318

$

241,565

$

19,735

$

745,743

_____________________

(1)

Loans Payable includ es our loans payable to banks.

(2)

Long-term debt excludes imputed interest and executory costs on capitalized lease obligations and unamortized issuance costs on the term loan facility.

(3)

Interest represents only contractual payments for fixed-rate debt.

(4)

Purchase commitments are noncancelable contractual obligations for raw materials and energy.

(5)

We have not projected payments past 2017 due to uncertainties in estimating the amount and period of any payments.  The amount above relates to our current income tax liability as of De cember 31, 2016 .  We have $ 27.8 million in gross liabilities related to unrecog nized tax benefits, including $3.1 million of accrued interest and penalties that are not included in the above table since we cannot reasonably predict the timing of cash settlements with various taxing authorities.

(6)

The funding amounts are based on the minimum contributions required under our various plans and applicable regulations in each respective country. We have not p rojected contributions past 2018 due to uncertainties regarding the assumptions involved in estimating future required contributions.

Critical Accounting Policies

When we prepare our consolidated financial statements we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts we report in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes. We consider the policies discussed below to be more critical than other policies because their application requires our most subjective or complex judgments. These estimates and judgments arise because of the inherent uncertainty in predicting future events. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize sales typically when we ship goods to our customers and when all of the following criteria are met:

·

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

·

The selling price is fixed or determinable;

·

Collection is reasonably assured; and

·

Title and risk of loss has passed to our customers.

In order to ensure the revenue recognition in the proper period, we review material sales contracts for proper cut-off based upon the business practices and legal requirements of each country. For sales of products containing precious metals, we report revenues gross along with their corresponding cost of sales to arrive at gross profit. We record revenues this way because we act as the principal in the transactions into which we enter.

37


Restructuring and Cost Reduction Programs

In recent years, we have developed and initiated a global cost reduction program with the objectives of leveraging our global scale, realigning and lowering our cost structure, and optimizing capacity utilization. Management continues to evaluate our businesses, and therefore, there may be additional provisions for new optimization and cost-savings initiatives, as well as changes in estimates to amounts previously recorded, as payments are made or actions are completed.

Restructuring charges include both termination benefits and asset writedowns. We estimate accruals for termination benefits based on various factors including length of service, contract provisions, local legal requirements, projected final service dates, and salary levels. We also analyze the carrying value of long-lived assets and record estimated accelerated depreciation through the anticipated end of the useful life of the assets affected by the restructuring or record an asset impairment. In all likelihood, this accelerated depreciation will result in reducing the net book value of those assets to zero at the date operations cease. While we believe that changes to our estimates are unlikely, the accuracy of our estimates depends on the successful completion of numerous actions. Changes in our estimates could increase our restructuring costs to such an extent that it could have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. Other events, such as negotiations with unions and works councils, may also delay the resulting cost savings.

Accounts Receivable and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Ferro sells its products to customers in diversified industries throughout the world. No customer or related group of customers represents greater than 10% of net sales or accounts receivable. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and require collateral principally for export sales, when industry practices allow and as market conditions dictate, subject to our ability to negotiate secured terms relative to competitive offers. We regularly analyze significant customer accounts and provide for uncollectible accounts based on historical experience, customer payment history, the length of time the receivables are past due, the financial health of the customer, economic conditions, and specific circumstances, as appropriate. Changes in these factors could result in additional allowances. Customer accounts we conclude to be uncollectible or to require excessive collection costs are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. Historically, write-offs of uncollectible accounts have been within our expectations.

Goodwill

We review goodwill for impairment each year using a measurement date of October 31st or more frequently in the event of an impairment indicator. We annually, or more frequently as warranted, evaluate the appropriateness of our reporting units utilizing operating segments as the starting point of our analysis.  In the event of a change in our reporting units, we would allocate goodwill based on the relative fair value. We estimate the fair values of the reporting units associated with these assets using the average of both the income approach and the market approach, which we believe provides a reasonable estimate of the reporting units’ fair values, unless facts and circumstances exist that indicate more representative fair values. The income approach uses projected cash flows attributable to the reporting units over their useful lives and allocates certain corporate expenses to the reporting units. We use historical results, trends and our projections of market growth, internal sales efforts and anticipated cost structure assumptions to estimate future cash flows. Using a risk-adjusted, weighted-average cost of capital, we discount the cash flow projections to the measurement date. The market approach estimates a price reasonably expected to be paid by a market participant in the purchase of similar businesses. If the fair value of any reporting unit was determined to be less than its carrying value, we would proceed to the second step and obtain comparable market values or independent appraisals of its assets and liabilities to determine the amount of any impairment.

The significant assumptions and ranges of assumptions we used in our impairment analyses of goodwill at October 31, 2016 and 2015 , were as follows:









Significant Assumptions

2016

2015

Weighted-average cost of capital

10.75% - 13.5

%

11.5% - 12.75

%

Residual growth rate

3.0

%

3.0

%





Our estimates of fair value can be adversely affected by a variety of factors. Reductions in actual or projected growth or profitability at our reporting units due to unfavorable market conditions or significant increases in cost structure could lead to the impairment of any

38


related goodwill. Additionally, an increase in inflation, interest rates or the risk-adjusted, weighted-average cost of capital could also lead to a reduction in the fair value of one or more of our reporting units and therefore lead to the impairment of goodwill.

Based on our 2016 annual impairment test performed as of October 31, 2016 , we recognized an im pairment loss of $13.2 million in our Tile Coating Systems reporting unit, a component of our Performance Coatings segment. For the remaining reporting units tested for impairment, the fair values exceeded the carrying values of the respective reporting units by amounts ranging from 27.2% to 303.7 % at the 2016 measurement date. The lowest cushion relates to goodwill associated with th e Performance Coatings reportable segment, which had a goodwill balance of $28.1 million at December 31, 2016 .   A future potential impairment is possible for any of these reporting units if actual results are materially less than forecasted results. Some of the factors that could negatively affect our cash flows and, as a result, not support the carrying values of our reporting units are: new environmental regulations or legal restrictions on the use of our products that would either reduce our product revenues or add substantial costs to the manufacturing process, thereby reducing operating margins; new technologies that could make our products less competitive or require substantial capital investment in new equipment or manufacturing processes; and substantial downturns in economic conditions.

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

The Company’s long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets. We review property, plant and equipment and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable. The following are examples of such events or changes in circumstances:

·

An adverse change in the business climate or market price of a long-lived asset or asset group;

·

An adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset or asset group is used or in its physical condition;

·

Current operating losses for a long-lived asset or asset group combined with a history of such losses or projected or forecasted losses that demonstrate that the losses will continue; or

·

A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise significantly disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life.

The carrying amount of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets is not recoverable if the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset group. In the event of impairment, we recognize a loss for the excess of the recorded value over fair value. The long-term nature of these assets requires the estimation of cash inflows and outflows several years into the future and only takes into consideration technological advances known at the time of review.

Income Taxes

The breadth of our operations and complexity of income tax regulations require us to assess uncertainties and make judgments in estimating the ultimate amount of income taxes we will pay. Our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits reflect management’s best assessment of estimated current and future taxes to be paid. The final income taxes we pay are based upon many factors, including existing income tax laws and regulations, negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions, outcomes of tax litigation, and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state and international income tax audits. The resolution of these uncertainties may result in adjustments to our income tax assets and liabilities in the future.

Deferred income taxes result from differences between the financial and tax basis of our assets and liabilities. We adjust our deferred income tax assets and liabilities for changes in income tax rates and income tax laws when changes are enacted. We record valuation allowances to reduce deferred income tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the need for and the magnitude of appropriate valuation allowances against deferred income tax assets. The realization of these assets is dependent on generating future taxable income, our ability to carry back or carry forward net operating losses and credits to offset tax liabilities, as well as successful implementation of various tax strategies to generate tax where net operating losses or credit carryforwards exist. In evaluating our ability to realize the deferred income tax assets, we rely principally on the reversal of existing temporary differences, the availability of tax planning strategies, and forecasted income.

We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Our estimate of the

39


potential outcome of any uncertain tax positions is subject to management’s assessment of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that time. We record a liability for the difference between the benefit recognized and measured based on a more-likely-than-not threshold and the tax position taken or expected to be taken on the tax return. To the extent that our assessment of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. We report tax-related interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We use derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates , and precious metal prices. The accounting for derivative financial instruments can be complex and can require significant judgment. Generally, the derivative financial instruments that we use are not complex, and observable market-based inputs are available to measure their fair value. We do not engage in speculative transactions for trading purposes. Financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, expose us to counterparty credit risk for nonperformance. We manage our exposure to counterparty credit risk through minimum credit standards and procedures to monitor concentrations of credit risk. We enter into these derivative financial instruments with major, reputable, multinational financial institutions. Accordingly, we do not anticipate counter-party default. We continuously evaluate the effectiveness of derivative financial instruments designated as hedges to ensure that they are highly effective. In the event the hedge becomes ineffective, we discontinue hedge treatment. Except as noted below, we do not expect any changes in our risk policies or in the nature of the transactions we enter into to mitigate those risks.

We manage foreign currency risks in a wide variety of foreign currencies principally by entering into forward contracts to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on transactions arising from international trade. Our objective in entering into these forward contracts is to preserve the economic value of nonfunctional currency cash flows. Our principal foreign currency exposures relate to the Euro, the Thailand Baht , the Indonesian Rupiah, the Japanese Yen, a nd the Romanian Leu . We mark these forward contracts to fair value based on market prices for comparable contracts and recognize the resulting gains or losses as other income or expense from foreign currency transactions.

Precious metals (primarily silver, gold, platinum and palladium) represent a significant portion of raw material costs in our electronic s products. When we enter into a fixed price sales contract at the customer’s request to establish the price for the precious metals content of the order, we also enter into a forward purchase arrangement with a precious metals supplier to completely cover the value of the precious metals content. Our current precious metal contracts are designated as normal purchase contracts, which are not marked to market.

We also purchase portions of our energy requirements, including natural gas and electricity, under fixed price contracts to reduce the volatility of cost changes. Our current energy contracts are designated as normal purchase contracts, which are not marked to market.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

We sponsor defined benefit plans in the U.S. and many countries outside the U.S., and we also sponsor retiree medical benefits for a segment of our salaried and hourly work force within the U. S. The U.S. pension plans and retiree medical plans represent approximately 89% of pension plan assets, 73% of benefit obligations and 24 % of net periodic pension expense as of December 31, 2016 .

The assumptions we use in actuarial calculations for these plans have a significant impact on benefit obligations and annual net periodic benefit costs. We meet with our actuaries annually to discuss key economic assumptions used to develop these benefit obligations and net periodic costs.

We determine the discount rate for the U.S. pension and retiree medical plans based on a bond model. Using the pension plans’ projected cash flows, the bond model considers all possible bond portfolios that produce matching cash flows and selects the portfolio with the highest possible yield. These portfolios are based on bonds with a quality rating of AA or better under either Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or Standard & Poor’s Rating Group, but exclude certain bonds, such as callable bonds, bonds with small amounts outstanding, and bonds with unusually high or low yields. The discount rates for the non-U.S. plans are based on a yield curve method, using AA-rated bonds applicable in their respective capital markets. The duration of each plan’s liabilities is used to select the rate from the yield curve corresponding to the same duration.

40


For the market-related value of plan assets, we use fair value, rather than a calculated value. The market-related value recognizes changes in fair value in a systematic and rational manner over several years. We calculate the expected return on assets at the beginning of the year for defined benefit plans as the weighted-average of the expected return for the target allocation of the principal asset classes held by each of the plans. In determining the expected returns, we consider both historical performance and an estimate of future long-term rates of return. The Company consults with and considers the opinion of its actuaries in developing appropriate return assumptions. Our target asset allocation percentages are 35% fixed income, 60% equity, and 5% other investments for U.S. plans and 75% fixed income, 24% equity, and 1% other investments for non-U.S. plans. In 2016, investment returns on average plan assets were approximately 7 % within the U.S. p l ans and 23% within non-U.S. plans . In 2015, actual return on plan assets, were lower than the expected return. Future actual pension expense will depend on future investment allocation and performance, changes in future discount rates and various other factors related to the population of participants in the Company’s pension plans.

All other assumptions are reviewed periodically by our actuaries and us and may be adjusted based on current trends and expectations as well as past experience in the plans. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company adopted the use of new mortality tables within its calculation assumptions, which had a one-time impact of increasing the liability. The new mortality tables reflect underlying increases in life expectancy of participants, thus driving longer benefit payment periods. The impact of the change in mortality assumption on the U.S. pension liability was an increase of the liability of approximately $18 million.

The following table provides the sensitivity of net annual periodic benefit costs for our pension plans, including a U.S. nonqualified retirement plan, and the retiree medical plan to a 25-basis-point decrease in both the discount rate and asset return assumption:











25 Basis Point



25 Basis Point

Decrease in



Decrease in

Asset Return



Discount Rate

Assumption





(Dollars in thousands)

U.S. pension plans

$

(465)

$

681

U.S. retiree medical plan

(34)

N/A

Non-U.S. pension plans

(63)

17

Total

$

(562)

$

698



The following table provides the rates used in the assumptions and the changes between 2016 and 2015 :











2016

2015

Change

Discount rate used to measure the benefit cost:

U.S. pension plans

4.70

%

4.25

%

0.45

%

U.S. retiree medical plan

4.50

%

3.95

%

0.55

%

Non-U.S. pension plans

3.12

%

2.72

%

0.40

%

Discount rate used to measure the benefit obligation:

U.S. pension plans

4.40

%

4.70

%

(0.30)

%

U.S. retiree medical plan

4.20

%

4.50

%

(0.30)

%

Non-U.S. pension plans

2.24

%

3.12

%

(0.88)

%

Expected return on plan assets:

U.S. pension plans

8.20

%

8.20

%

%

Non-U.S. pension plans

3.41

%

3.50

%

(0.09)

%

Our overall net periodic benefit cost for all defined benefit plans was $ 20.2 million in 2016 and $1.5 million in 2015 . The change is mainly the result of increased mark to market actuarial net losses in 2016 .

For 2017 , assuming expected returns on plan assets and no actuarial gains or losses, we expect our o verall net periodic benefit income to be approximately $1.2 million, compared with income of ap proximately $0.1 million in 2016 on a comparable basis.

41


Inventories

We value inventory at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined utilizing the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. We periodically evaluate the net realizable value of inventories based primarily upon their age, but also upon assumptions of future usage in production, customer demand and market conditions. Inventories have been reduced to the lower of cost or realizable value by allowances for slow moving or obsolete goods. If actual circumstances are less favorable than those projected by management in its evaluation of the net realizable value of inventories, additional write-downs may be required. Slow moving, excess or obsolete materials are specifically identified and may be physically separated from other materials, and we rework or dispose of these materials as time and manpower permit.

Environmental Liabilities

Our manufacturing facilities are subject to a broad array of environmental laws and regulations in the countries in which they are located. The costs to comply with complex environmental laws and regulations are significant and will continue for the foreseeable future. We expense these recurring costs as they are incurred. While these costs may increase in the future, they are not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

We also accrue for environmental remediation costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and we can reasonably estimate the amount. We determine the timing and amount of any liability based upon assumptions regarding future events. Inherent uncertainties exist in such evaluations primarily due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulations and legal standards regarding liability, and evolving technologies. We adjust these liabilities periodically as remediation efforts progress or as additional technical or legal information becomes available.

Impact of Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of accounting standards we recently adopted or will be required to adopt.

42


Item 7A — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The primary objective of the following information is to provide forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our exposure to instruments that are sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and costs of raw materials and energy.

Our exposure to interest rate risk arises from our debt portfolio. We manage this risk by controlling the mix of fixed versus variable-rate debt after considering the interest rate environment and expected future cash flows. Our objective is to limit variability in earnings, cash flows and overall borrowing costs caused by changes in interest rates, while preserving operating flexibility.

We operate internationally and enter into transactions denominated in foreign currencies. These transactions expose us to gains and losses arising from exchange rate movements between the dates foreign currencies are recorded and the dates they are settled. We manage this risk by entering into forward currency contracts that substantially offset these gains and losses.

We are subject to cost changes with respect to our raw materials and energy purchases. We attempt to mitigate raw materials cost increases through product reformulat ions, price increases and productivity improvements. We enter into forward purchase arrangements with preci ous metals suppliers to completely cover the value of the precious metals content of fixed price sales contracts. These agreements are designated as normal purchase contracts, which are not marked to market, and had purchase commitments totaling $ 1.8 million at December 31, 2016 . In addition, we purchase portions of our natural gas, electricity and oxygen requirements under fixed price contracts to reduce the volatility of these costs. These energy contracts are designated as normal purchase contracts, which are not marked to market, and had purchase commitments totaling $ 99.1 million at December 31, 2016 .

The notional amounts, carrying amounts of assets (liabilities), and fair values associated with our exposure to these market risks and sensitivity analysis about potential gains (losses) resulting from hypothetical changes in market rates are presented below:











December 31,

December 31,



2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Variable-rate debt:

Carrying amount

$

551,085

$

461,717

Fair value

570,441

466,571

Change in annual interest expense from 1% change in interest rates

5,611

4,690

Fixed-rate debt:

Carrying amount

8,228

4,610

Fair value

7,315

3,956

Change in fair value from 1% increase in interest rates

NM

NM

Change in fair value from 1% decrease in interest rates

NM

NM

Foreign currency forward contracts:

Notional amount

338,186

338,418

Carrying amount and fair value

350

(1,207)

Change in fair value from 10% appreciation of U.S. dollar

15,589

19,814

Change in fair value from 10% depreciation of U.S. dollar

(19,054)

(24,217)

NM -- Not meaningful



43


Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ferro Corporation

Cleveland, Ohio

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ferro Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included t he financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial st atement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements a nd financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ferro Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 1, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

March 1, 2017





44


FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS









Years Ended December 31,



2016

2015

2014





(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Net sales

$

1,145,292

$

1,075,341

$

1,111,626

Cost of sales

794,075

773,661

826,541

Gross profit

351,217

301,680

285,085

Selling, general and administrative expenses

241,702

216,899

286,762

Restructuring and impairment charges

15,907

9,655

8,849

Other expense (income):

Interest expense

21,547

15,163

16,263

Interest earned

(630)

(363)

(118)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

14,384

Foreign currency losses, net

12,906

4,495

1,159

Miscellaneous (income) expense, net

(2,660)

1,048

622

Income (loss) before income taxes

62,445

54,783

(42,836)

Income tax expense (benefit)

17,868

(45,100)

(34,227)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

44,577

99,883

(8,609)

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

(64,464)

(36,779)

94,840

Net (loss) income

(19,887)

63,104

86,231

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

930

(996)

160

Net (loss) income attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders

$

(20,817)

$

64,100

$

86,071



Amounts attributable to Ferro Corporation:

Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax

43,647

100,879

(8,769)

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income tax

(64,464)

(36,779)

94,840

(Loss) income attributable to Ferro Corporation

$

(20,817)

$

64,100

$

86,071

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

83,298

86,718

86,920

Incremental common shares attributable to performance shares, deferred stock units, restricted stock units, and stock options

1,612

1,715

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding

84,910

88,433

86,920

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders:

Basic earnings (loss):

Continuing operations

$

0.52

$

1.16

$

(0.10)

Discontinued operations

(0.77)

(0.42)

1.09



$

(0.25)

$

0.74

$

0.99

Diluted earnings (loss):

Continuing operations

$

0.51

$

1.14

$

(0.10)

Discontinued operations

(0.76)

(0.42)

1.09



$

(0.25)

$

0.72

$

0.99



See accompanying not es to consolidated financial statements.

45


FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDA TED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) I NCOME











Years Ended December 31,



2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Net (loss) income

$

(19,887)

$

63,104

$

86,231

Other comprehensive loss, net of income tax:

Foreign currency translation loss

(47,101)

(40,801)

(29,415)

Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation included in net (loss) income

1,115

Postretirement benefit liabilities gain (loss)

330

(77)

(1,054)

Other comprehensive loss, net of income tax

(45,656)

(40,878)

(30,469)

Total comprehensive (loss) income

(65,543)

22,226

55,762

Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

599

(2,361)

(11)

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Ferro Corporation

$

(66,142)

$

24,587

$

55,773



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



46


FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLID

ATED BALANCE SHEETS









December 31,

December 31,



2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

ASSETS

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$

45,582

$

58,380

Accounts receivable, net

259,687

231,970

Inventories

229,847

184,854

Deferred income taxes

12,088

Other receivables

37,814

34,088

Other current assets

9,087

15,695

Current assets held-for-sale

16,215

Total current assets

582,017

553,290

Other assets

Property, plant and equipment, net

262,026

260,429

Goodwill

148,296

145,669

Intangible assets, net

137,850

106,633

Deferred income taxes

106,454

87,385

Other non-current assets

47,126

48,767

Non-current assets held-for-sale

23,178

Total assets

$

1,283,769

$

1,225,351

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Current liabilities

Loans payable and current portion of long-term debt

$

17,310

$

7,446

Accounts payable

127,655

120,380

Accrued payrolls

35,859

28,584

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

65,203

54,664

Current liabilities held-for-sale

7,156

Total current liabilities

246,027

218,230

Other liabilities

Long-term debt, less current portion

557,175

466,108

Postretirement and pension liabilities

162,941

148,249

Other non-current liabilities

62,594

66,990

Non-current liabilities held-for-sale

1,493

Total liabilities

1,028,737

901,070

Equity

Ferro Corporation shareholders’ equity:

Common stock, par value $1 per share; 300.0 million shares authorized; 93.4 million shares issued; 83.4 million and 84.0 million shares outstanding at December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively

93,436

93,436

Paid-in capital

306,566

314,854

Retained earnings

114,690

135,507

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(106,643)

(61,318)

Common shares in treasury, at cost

(160,936)

(166,020)

Total Ferro Corporation shareholders’ equity

247,113

316,459

Noncontrolling interests

7,919

7,822

Total equity

255,032

324,281

Total liabilities and equity

$

1,283,769

$

1,225,351



See a ccompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

47


FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONS OLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY











Ferro Corporation Shareholders



Common Shares

Accumulated



in Treasury

Retained

Other

Non-



Common

Paid-in

(Deficit)

Comprehensive

controlling

Total



Shares

Amount

Stock

Capital

Earnings

Income (Loss) (a)

Interests

Equity





(In thousands)

Balances at December 31, 2013

6,730

$

(143,802)

$

93,436

$

318,055

$

(14,664)

$

8,493

$

12,325

$

273,843

Net income

86,071

160

86,231

Other comprehensive (loss)

(30,298)

(171)

(30,469)

Stock-based compensation transactions

(285)

7,744

(651)

7,093

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(682)

(682)

Balances at December 31, 2014

6,445

(136,058)

93,436

317,404

71,407

(21,805)

11,632

336,016

Net income (loss)

64,100

(996)

63,104

Other comprehensive (loss)

(39,513)

(1,365)

(40,878)

Purchase of treasury stock

3,283

(38,571)

(38,571)

Stock-based compensation transactions

(297)

8,609

(2,550)

6,059

Sale of noncontrolling interest

(581)

(581)

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(868)

(868)

Balances at December 31, 2015

9,431

(166,020)

93,436

314,854

135,507

(61,318)

7,822

324,281

Net (loss) income

(20,817)

930

(19,887)

Other comprehensive loss

(45,325)

(331)

(45,656)

Purchase of treasury stock

1,175

(11,429)

(11,429)

Stock-based compensation transactions

(610)

16,513

(8,288)

8,225

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(502)

(502)

Balances at December 31, 2016

9,996

$

(160,936)

$

93,436

$

306,566

$

114,690

$

(106,643)

$

7,919

$

255,032



_____________________

(a)

Accumulated translation adjustments were ($107 .7 ) million , ($62.1 ) million , and ($22.6) million and accumulated postretirement benefit liability adjustments were $1.1 million , $0.8 million , and $0 .9 million at December 31, 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , respectively, all net of tax.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



48


FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSO

LIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS









2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities

Net (loss) income

$

(19,887)

$

63,104

$

86,231

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:

(Gain) loss on sale of assets and businesses

(2,764)

1,836

(124,026)

Depreciation and amortization

46,805

41,061

35,384

Interest amortization

1,353

1,125

3,106

Restructuring and impairment charges

50,868

13,270

11,564

Loss on extinguishment of debt

14,384

Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts

1,383

639

2,731

Retirement benefits

14,436

(5,986)

55,755

Deferred income taxes

(11,451)

(66,328)

(21,310)

Stock-based compensation

7,245

8,868

9,679

Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:

Accounts receivable

(21,893)

20,208

(5,667)

Inventories

(10,271)

6,562

(12,575)

Other receivables and other current assets

(3,006)

4,147

(8,570)

Accounts payable

1,162

(14,605)

5,936

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

11,626

(23,547)

(12,515)

Other operating activities

(2,976)

848

20,366

Net cash provided by operating activities

62,630

51,202

60,473

Cash flows from investing activities

Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets

(24,945)

(43,087)

(53,768)

Proceeds from sale of businesses, net

237,830

Proceeds from sale of assets

3,634

642

6,740

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

(129,511)

(202,155)

(115,598)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

(150,822)

(244,600)

75,204

Cash flows from financing activities

Net borrowings (repayments) under loans payable (1)

4,596

(7,261)

(41,101)

Proceeds from revolving credit facility

355,743

242,390

457,907

Principal payments on term loan facility

(53,000)

(3,000)

(750)

Principal payments on revolving credit facility

(214,188)

(72,390)

(467,112)

Proceeds from term loan facility

300,000

Repayment of 7.875% Senior Notes

(260,451)

Payment of debt issuance costs

(711)

(7,071)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

1,140

404

684

Purchase of treasury stock

(11,429)

(38,571)

Other financing activities

(154)

(1,846)

(249)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

81,997

119,726

(18,143)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

(6,603)

(8,448)

(5,362)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

(12,798)

(82,120)

112,172

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

58,380

140,500

28,328

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

45,582

$

58,380

$

140,500

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest

$

17,486

$

16,188

$

28,536

Income taxes

$

19,734

$

21,364

$

9,376

_____________________

(1)

Includes cash flows related to loans payable to banks , the payment of the assumption of debt relating to acquisitions and our domestic accounts receivable sales program.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.





49


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

1. Our Business

Ferro Corporation (“Ferro,” “we,” “us” or “the Company”) is a leading producer of specialty materials that are sold to a broad range of manufacturers who, in turn, make products for many end-use markets. Ferro’s products fall into two general categories: functional coatings, which perform specific functions in the manufacturing processes and end products of our customers; and color solutions, which provide aesthetic and performance characteristics to our customers’ products. We differentiate ourselves in our industry by the consistent high quality of our products, combined with delivery of localized technical service and customized application technology supp ort.  Our value-added technical services assist customers in their material specification and evaluation, product design, and manufacturing process characterization in order to help them optimize the application of our products. We manage our businesses through four business units that are differentiated from one another by product type. We have grouped these units by their product type below:





Tile Coating Systems

Porcelain Enamel

Performance Colors and Glass

Pigments, Powders and Oxides

We produce our products primarily in the Europe-Middle East region, the U.S. , the Asia-Pacific region, and Latin America.

We sell our products directly to customers and through the use of agents or distributors throughout the world. Our p roducts are sold principally in Europe , the U.S. , the Asia-Pacific region, and Latin America. Our customers manufacture products to serve a variety of end markets, including building and renovation, electronics, automobiles, appliances, household furnishings, packaging, and industrial products.

The Company owned 51% of an operating affiliate in Venezuela that was a c onsolidated subsidiary of Ferro. During the fourth quarter of 2015, we sold the operating affiliate in Venezuela for a cash purchase price of $0.5 million. During 2015, the Ministry of Economy, Finance, and Public Banking, and the Central Bank of Venezuela published a new exchange rate, the Foreign Exchange Marginal System (“SIMADI”). We concluded in March 2015 that SIMADI was the most relevant exchange mechanism available, and began using SIMADI to translate the local currency financial statements.  As a result of the revaluation, we recognized a $1.9 million foreign currency loss and a $2.6 million loss due to lower of cost or market charges against our inventory, prior to the adjustment for losses allocated to our noncontrolling interest partner, which is recorded within Foreign currency losses, net and Cost of sales, respectively, in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

In the first quarter of 2014, the Ve nezuelan government expanded and introduced alternative market mechanisms for monetary exchange between the local currency, the Bolivar, and the United States Dollar. As a result of changes in the political and economic environment in the country, we began to remeasure the monetary assets and liabilities of the entity utilizing the most relevant exchange mechanism available, which we concluded to be SICAD I in the first quarter of 2014. The impact of the remeasurement in 2014, prior to adjustment for losses allocated to our noncontrolling interest partner, was a loss of $1.6 mil lion, which is recorded within Foreign currency losses, net in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.



During the second quarter of 2014, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of our Specialty Plastics and Polymer Additives reportable segments were classified as held-for-sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As further discussed in Note 3, the Specialty Plastics sale closed on July 1, 2014, and the North America-based Polymer Additives sale closed on December 19, 2014. Therefore, the Specialty Plastics and North America-based Polymer Additives operating results, net of income tax, have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement s of operations for all periods presented. In the third quarter of 2016, we completed the disposition of the Europe-based Polymer Additives business and have classified the related operating results, net of income tax, as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.



50


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)



2. Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the parent company and the accounts of its subsidiaries. When we consolidate our financial statements, we eliminate intercompany transactions, accounts and profits. When we exert significant influence over an investee but do not control it, we account for the investment and the investment income using the equity method. These investments are reported in the Other non-current assets section of our balance sheet. We consolidate four legal entities in which we do not own 100% of the equity interests, either directly or indirectly through our subsidiaries. These entities have non-controlling interest ownerships ranging from 5% to 41%.

When we acquire a subsidiary, its financial results are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition. When we dispose of a subsidiary, its financial results are included in our consolidated financial statements until the date of the disposition. In the event that a disposal group meets the criteria for discontinued operations, prior periods are adjusted to reflect the classification.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation within the operating activities section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions in the Preparation of Financial Statements

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which requires us to make estimates and to use judgments and assumptions that affect the timing and amount of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses recorded and disclosed. The more significant estimates and judgments relate to revenue recognition, restructuring and cost reduction programs, goodwill, asset impairment, income taxes, pension and other postretirement benefits, inventories, and environmental liabilities. Actual outcomes could differ from our estimates, resulting in changes in revenues or costs that could have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial results of our operations outside of the U.S. are recorded in local currencies, which generally are also the functional currencies for financial reporting purposes. The results of operations outside of the U.S. are translated from these functional currencies into U.S. dollars using the average monthly currency exchange rates. We use the average currency exchange rate for these results of operations as a reasonable approximation of the results had specific currency exchange rates been used for each individual transaction. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded as incurred as Other expense (income) in the consolidated statements of operations. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates at the balance sheet dates, and we record the resulting foreign currency translation adjustment as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in equity.

Revenue Recognition

We typically recognize sales when we ship goods to our customers and when all of the following criteria are met:

·

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

·

The selling price is fixed or determinable;

·

Collection is reasonably assured; and

·

Title and risk of loss has passed to our customers.

In order to ensure the revenue recognition in the proper period, we review material sales contracts for proper cut-off based upon the business practices and legal requirements of each country. For sales of all products, including those containing precious metals, we

51


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

report revenues gross along with their corresponding cost of sales to arrive at gross profit. We record revenues this way because we act as the principal in the transactions into which we enter.

The amount of shipping and handling fees invoiced to our customers at the time our product is shipped is included in net sales. Credit memos issued to customers for sales returns, discounts allowed and sales adjustments are recorded when they are incurred as a reduction of sales.

Additionally, we provide certain of our customers with incentive rebate programs to promote customer loyalty and encourage greater product sales. We accrue customer rebates over the rebate periods based upon estimated attainments of the provisions in the rebate agreements and record these rebate accruals as reductions of sales.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred and are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses. Total expenditures for product and application technology, including research and development, customer technical support and other related activities, were approximately $27.3 million for 2016, $25.6 million for 2015 and $22.7 million for 2014.

Restructuring Programs

We expense costs associated with exit and disposal activities designed to restructure operations and reduce ongoing costs of operations when we incur the related liabilities or when other triggering events occur. After the appropriate level of management having the authority approves the detailed restructuring plan and the appropriate criteria for recognition are met, we establish accruals for employee termination costs. The accruals are estimates that are based upon factors including statutory and union requirements, affected employees’ lengths of service, contract provisions, salary level, and health care benefit choices. We also analyze the carrying value of affected long-lived assets for impairment and reductions in their remaining estimated useful lives. In addition, we record the fair value of any new or remaining obligations when existing operating lease contracts are terminated or abandoned as a result of our exit and disposal activities.

Asset Impairment

The Company’s long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment, goodwill, and intangible assets. We review property, plant and equipment and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable. The following are examples of such events or changes in circumstances:

·

An adverse change in the business climate or market price of a long-lived asset or asset group;

·

An adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset or asset group is used or in its physical condition;

·

Current operating losses for a long-lived asset or asset group combined with a history of such losses or projected or forecasted losses that demonstrate that the losses will continue; or

·

A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise significantly disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life.

The carrying amount of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets is not recoverable if the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset group. In the event of impairment, we recognize a loss for the excess of the recorded value over fair value. The long-term nature of these assets requires the estimation of cash inflows and outflows several years into the future and only takes into consideration technological advances known at the time of review.

We review goodwill for impairment annually using a measurement date of October 31, primarily due to the timing of our annual budgeting process, or more frequently in the event of an impairment indicator. The fair value of each reporting unit that has goodwill is estimated using the average of both the income approach and the market approach, which we believe provides a reasonable estimate of

52


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

the reporting unit’s fair value, unless facts or circumstances exist which indicate a more representative fair value. The income approach is a discounted cash flow model, which uses projected cash flows attributable to the reporting unit, including an allocation of certain corporate expenses based primarily on a proportional sales method. We use historical results, trends and our projections of market growth, internal sales efforts and anticipated cost structure assumptions to estimate future cash flows. Using a risk-adjusted, weighted-average cost of capital, we discount the cash flow projections to the measurement date. The market approach estimates a price reasonably expected to be paid by a market participant in the purchase of the reporting units based on a comparison to similar businesses. If the fair value of any reporting unit was determined to be less than its carrying value, we would obtain comparable market values or independent appraisals of its net assets.

Derivative Financial Instruments

As part of our risk management activities, we employ derivative financial instruments, primarily foreign currency forward contracts, to hedge certain anticipated transactions, firm commitments, or assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. We also purchase portions of our energy and precious metal requirements under fixed price forward purchase contracts designated as normal purchase contracts.

We record derivatives on our balance sheet as either assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings.  As of December 31, 2016, we did not have any derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges. The ineffective portion, if any, in the change in value of these derivatives is immediately recognized in earnings. For derivatives that are not designated as hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in current earnings. We use derivatives only to manage well-defined risks and do not use derivatives for speculative purposes.

Postretirement and Other Employee Benefits

We recognize postretirement and other employee benefits as employees render the services necessary to earn those benefits. We determine defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations with the assistance of third parties who perform certain actuarial calculations. The calculations and the resulting amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements are affected by assumptions including the discount rate, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the annual rate of change in compensation for plan-eligible employees, estimated changes in costs of healthcare benefits, mortality tables, and other factors. We evaluate the assumptions used on an annual basis.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, Income Taxes, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax effects of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

We record deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future income, tax planning strategies, and recent financial operations.

We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits.

53


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions within the income tax expense line in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. These instruments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

Accounts Receivable and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Ferro sells its products to customers in diversified industries throughout the world. No customer or related group of customers represents greater than 10% of net sales or accounts receivable. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and require collateral principally for export sales, when industry practices allow and as market conditions dictate, subject to our ability to negotiate secured terms relative to competitive offers. We regularly analyze significant customer accounts and provide for uncollectible accounts based on historical experience, customer payment history, the length of time the receivables are past due, the financial health of the customer, economic conditions and specific circumstances, as appropriate. Changes in these factors could result in additional allowances. Customer accounts we conclude to be uncollectible or to require excessive collection costs are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. Historically, write-offs of uncollectible accounts have been within our expectations. Detailed information about the allowance for doubtful accounts is provided below:











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$

8,166

$

7,784

$

10,325

Bad debt expense

1,383

667

2,657



We had an asset securitization program for Ferro’s U.S. trade accounts receivable where we sold undivided variable percentage interests in our domestic receivables to various purchasers, and could obtain up to $50 million in the form of cash or letters of credit. Advances received under this program were accounted for as borrowings secured by the receivables and are included in net cash provided by financing activities. The purchasers had no recourse to Ferro’s other assets for failure of payment of the receivables as a result of the lack of creditworthiness, or financial inability to pay, of the related obligor.  In May 2014, the program expired and amounts outstanding were repaid at that time.

Inventories

We value inventory at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined utilizing the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. We periodically evaluate the net realizable value of inventories based primarily upon their age, but also upon assumptions of future usage in production, customer demand and market conditions. Inventories have been reduced to the lower of cost or market value by allowances for slow moving or obsolete goods.

We maintain raw materials on our premises that we do not own, including precious metals consigned from financial institutions and customers, and consigned to our broker; and raw materials consigned to vendors. Although we have physical possession of the goods, their value is not reflected on our balance sheet because we do not have title.

We obtain precious metals under consignment agreements with financial institutions for periods of one year or less. These precious metals are primarily silver, gold, platinum, and palladium and are used in the production of certain products for our customers. Under these arrangements, the financial institutions own the precious metals, and accordingly, we do not report these precious metals as inventory on our consolidated balance sheets although they physically are in our possession. These agreements are cancelable by either party at the end of each consignment period, however, because we have access to a number of consignment arrangements with available capacity, our consignment needs can be shifted among the other participating institutions in order to ensure our supply. In certain cases,

54


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

these financial institutions can require cash deposits to provide additional collateral beyond the value of the underlying precious metals. The financial institutions charge us fees for these consignment arrangements, and these fees are recorded as cost of sales.

Property, Plant and Equipment

We record property, plant and equipment at historical cost. In addition to the original purchased cost, including transportation, installation and taxes, we capitalize expenditures that increase the utility or useful life of existing assets. For constructed assets, we capitalize interest costs incurred during the period of construction. We expense repair and maintenance costs, including the costs of major planned overhauls of equipment, as incurred. We depreciate property, plant and equipment on a straight-line basis, generally over the following estimated useful lives of the assets:





Buildings

20 to 40 years

Machinery and equipment

5 to 15 years



Other Capitalized Costs

We capitalize the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use after the preliminary project stage has been completed, and management, with the relevant authority, authorizes and commits to funding a computer software project, and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. External direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use computer software, payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with the project, and interest costs incurred when developing computer software for internal use are capitalized within Intangible assets. Capitalization ceases when the project is substantially complete, generally after all substantial testing is completed. We expense training costs and data conversion costs as incurred. We amortize software on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, which has historically been in a range of 1 to 10 years.

Environmental Liabilities

As part of the production of some of our products, we handle, process, use and store hazardous materials. As part of these routine processes, we expense recurring costs associated with control and disposal of hazardous materials as they are incurred. Occasionally we are subject to ongoing, pending or threatened litigation related to the handling of these materials or other matters. If, based on available information, we believe that we have incurred a liability and we can reasonably estimate the amount, we accrue for environmental remediation and other contingent liabilities. We disclose material contingencies if the likelihood of the potential loss is reasonably possible but the amount is not reasonably estimable.

In estimating the amount to be accrued for environmental remediation, we use assumptions about:

·

Remediation requirements at the contaminated site;

·

The nature of the remedy;

·

Existing technology;

·

The outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies;

·

Other potentially responsible parties at multi-party sites; and

·

The number and financial viability of other potentially responsible parties.

We actively monitor the status of sites, and, as assessments and cleanups proceed, we update our assumptions and adjust our estimates as necessary. Because the timing of related payments is uncertain, we do not discount the estimated remediation costs.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement



55


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-17, Income Taxes: Topic 740: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes .  ASU 2015-17 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position.  During the second quarter of 2016, we elected to prospectively adopt ASU 2015-17, thus reclassifying current deferred tax assets to non-current on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  The prior reporting period was not retrospectively adjusted.  Other than this reclassification, the adoption of ASU 2015-17 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Standards

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Topic 350: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 is intended to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. This pronouncement is effective for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations: Topic 805: Clarifying the Definition of a Business. ASU 2017-01 is intended to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or dispositions) of assets or businesses. This pronouncement is effective for its annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods.  The Company is in the process of assessing the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes: Topic 740: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. ASU 2016-16 is intended to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. This pronouncement is effective for its annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is in the process of assessing the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.



In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flow: Topic 230: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 is intended to address eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice . This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is in the process of assessing the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.



In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation: Topic 718: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows.  This pronouncement is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is in the process of assessing the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.



In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases: Topic 842. ASU 2016-02 requires companies to recognize a lease liability and asset on the balance sheet for operating leases with a term greater than one year.  This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is in the process of assessing the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.



In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 . This ASU replaces nearly all existing U.S. GAAP guidance on revenue recognition. The standard prescribes a five-step model for recognizing revenue, the

56


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

application of which will require significant judgment. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Our evaluation of ASU 2014-09 is ongoing.  While we anticipate some changes to revenue recognition for certain customer contracts, we do not currently believe ASU 2014-09 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

No other new accounting pronouncements issued or with effective dates during fiscal 2016 had or are expected to have a material impact of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





3 . Discontinued Operations

Polymer Additives

During 2014, we commenced a process to market for sale all of the assets of our Polymer Additives business.  We determined that the criteria to classify these assets as held-for-sale under ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, were met.  For purposes of applying the guidance within ASC 360, the assets have been categorized into two disposal groups: (1) our Europe-based Polymer Additives assets, including the Antwerp, Belgium dibenzoates manufacturing assets, and related Polymer Additives European headquarters and lab facilities and (2) the remainder of the Polymer Additives assets, our North America-based Polymer Additives business. During 2014, we sold substantially all of the assets related to our North America-based Polymer Additives business for a cash purchase price of $153.5 million.  The transaction resulted in net proceeds of $149.5 million after expenses, and a gain of approximately $72.7 million. We have classified the operating results and gain on sale, net of income tax, as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all relevant periods presented.



During 2016, the Company completed the disposition of the Europe-based Polymer Additives business to Plahoma Two AG, an affiliate of the LIVIA Group.  The Company made a capital contribution of €12 million (approximately $13.6 million) to its subsidiaries that owned the assets prior to t he close of the sale.  In 2016 , an impairment charge of $50.9 million was recorded under ASC Topic 360 Property, Plant and Equipment. The charge was calculated as the difference of the executed transaction price and the carrying value of the assets. The impairment charge included $1.1 million associated with the reclassification of foreign currency translation loss from Accumulated ot her comprehensive loss .  The Europe-based Polymer Additives operating results, net of income tax, are classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented and the assets and liabilities are classified as held-for-sale in the accompan ying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2015 , as the criteria to do so under ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment we re met as of the respective reporting dates .

Specialty Plastics

During 2014, we sold substantially all of the assets related to our Specialty Plastics business to A. Schulman, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, A. Schulman Castellon, S.L.U. (collectively "Schulman") for a cash purchase price of $91.0 million. The transaction resulted in net proceeds of $88.3 million after expenses, and a gain of approximately $54.9 million. Assets included in the transaction were Ferro's plastics manufacturing sites in Stryker, Ohio; Evansville and Plymouth, Indiana; Carpentersville, Illinois; and Castellon, Spain. We have classified the Specialty Plastics operating results and gain on sale, net of income tax, as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all relevant periods presented.

57


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

The table below summarizes results for Po lymer Additives and Specialty Plastics , for t he years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 , which are reflected in our consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations.  Interes t expense has been allocated to the discontinued operations based on the ratio of net assets of each business to consolidated net assets excluding debt.











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Net sales

$

18,481

$

33,825

$

343,348

Cost of sales

28,473

53,213

295,697

Gross (loss) profit

(9,992)

(19,388)

47,651

Selling, general and administrative expenses

3,094

4,189

17,737

Restructuring and impairment charges

50,902

11,792

21,769

Interest expense

325

763

3,846

Gain on sale of business, net

(127,579)

Miscellaneous (income) expense, net

(392)

647

1,090

(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income taxes

(63,921)

(36,779)

130,788

Income tax expense

543

35,948

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

$

(64,464)

$

(36,779)

$

94,840



The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities which are classified as he ld-fo r-sale at December 31, 2015 :











December 31, 2015



Accounts receivable, net

$

4,028

Inventories

9,733

Other current assets

2,454

Current assets held-for-sale

16,215

Property, plant and equipment, net

22,973

Other non-current assets

205

Non-current assets held-for-sale

23,178

Total assets held-for-sale

$

39,393



Accounts payable

$

5,736

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

1,420

Current liabilities held-for-sale

7,156

Other non-current liabilities

1,493

Total liabilities held-for-sale

$

8,649

4. Acquisitions

Cappelle

On December 9, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of the share capital of Belgium-based Cappelle Pigments NV (“Cappelle”), a leader in specialty, high-performance inorganic and organic pigments used in coating s , inks and plastics, for €40. 0 million (approximately $42. 4 million ).  The acquired business contributed net sales of $2.2 million and net loss attributable to Ferro Corporation of $1.8 million for the period from December 9, 2016 , to December 31, 2016 . The loss attributable to Ferro Corporation was primarily driven by purchase price adjustments .

The information included herein has been prepared based on the allocation of the purchase price using the fair value and useful lives of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which were determined with the assistance of third parties who performed independent valuations using discounted cash flow and comparative market approaches and estimates made by management. The

58


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

Company preliminarily recorded $3.5 million of goodwill, $24.1 million of personal and real property, $3.5 million of a deferred tax liability, debt of $10.3 million and $28. 6 million of net working capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

ESL

On October 31, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interest of Electro-Science Laboratories , Inc. (“ESL”), a leader in electronic packaging materials for $78.0 million.  ESL is headquartered in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.  The acquisition of ESL enhances the Company’s position in the electronic packaging materials space with complementary products, and offers a platform for g rowth in our Performance Colors and Glass segment.  ESL produces thick-film pastes and ceramics tape systems that enable important functionality in a wide variety of industrial and consumer applications. The acquired business contributed net sales of $6.1 million and net income attributable to Ferro Corporation of $0.5 million for the period from October 31, 2016 , to December 31, 2016. The Company incurred acquisition costs during the year ended December 31, 2016 of $1.9 million, which is included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.

The information included herein has been prepared based on the allocation of the purchase price using the fair value and useful lives of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which were determined with the assistance of third parties who performed independent valuations using discounted cash flow and comparative market approaches and estimates made by management. The Company preliminarily recorded $39.5 million of intangible assets, $19.9 million of goodwill, $2.9 million of personal and real property , $2.0 million of a deferred tax liability related to the amortizable intangibles assets and $17.7 million of net working capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

Delta Performance Products

On August 1, 2016, the Company acquired certain assets of Delta Performance Products, LLC, for a cash purchase price of $4.4 mill ion. The information included herein has been prepared based on the allocation of the purchase price using the fair value and useful lives of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which were determined with the assistance of third parties who performed independent valuations using discounted cash flow and comparative market approaches and estimates made by management. The Company preliminarily recorded $3.2 million of amortizable intangible assets, $0.4 million of goodwill, $0.2 million of a deferred tax asset and $0.6 million of net working capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

Pinturas

On June 1, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of privately held Pinturas Benicarló, S.L. (“Pinturas”) for €16 . 5 million in cash (approximately $18 . 4 million). The information included herein has been prepared based on the preliminary allocation of the purchase price using estimates of the fair value and useful lives of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which were determined with the assistance of third parties who performed independent valuations using discounted cash flow and comparative market approaches and estimates made by management. As of December 31, 2016, the purchase price allocation is subject to further adjustment until all information is fully evaluated by the Company. The Company preliminarily recorded $8.8 million of amortizable intangible assets, $3.9 million of goodwill, $0.7 million of personal and real property, $2. 7 million of a deferred tax liability related to the amortizable intangible assets, and $7 . 7 million of net working capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

Ferer



On January 5, 2016, the Company completed the purchase of 100% of the equity of privately held Istanbul-based Ferer Dis Ticaret Ve Kimyasallar Anonim Sirketi A.S. (“Fe rer”) on a cash-free and debt-free basis for $9.4 million in cash. The information included herein has been prepared based on the preliminary allocation of the purchase price using estimates of the fair value and useful lives of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which were determined with the assistance of third parties who performed independent valuations using discounted cash flow and comparative market approaches and estimates made by management. As of December 31, 2016, the purchase price allocation is subject to further adjustment until all information is fully evaluated by the Company. The Company

59


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

preliminarily recorded $3.3 million of amortizable intangible assets, $4.5 million of goodwill, $0.6 million of personal and real property, $0.7 million of a deferred tax liability related to the amortizable intangible assets, and $1.7 million of net working capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

Al Salomi

On November 17, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of Egypt-based tile coatings manufacturer Al Salomi for Frits and Glazes (“Al Salomi”) for Egyptian Pound (“EGP”) 307 million (approximately $38.2 million), including the assumption of debt. The acquired business contributed net sales of $24.4 million and net loss attributable to Ferro Corporation of $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 , and net sales of $2.3 million and net loss attributable to Ferro Corporation of $0.5 million for the period ending November 17, 2015 , to December 31, 2015.

The information included herein has been prepared based on the allocation of the purchase price using the fair value and useful lives of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which were determined with the assistance of third parties who performed independent valuations using discounted cash flow and comparative market approaches and estimates made by management. The Company recorded $15.0 million of amortizable intangible assets, $14.3 million of goodwill, $10.7 million of personal and real property, $4.8 million of a deferred tax liability related to the amortizable intangible assets, and $3.0 million of net working capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

Nubiola

On July 7, 2015, the Company acquired the entire share capital of Corporación Química Vhem, S.L., Dibon USA, LLC and Ivory Corporation, S.A. (together with their direct and indirect subsidiaries, “Nubiola”) on a cash-free and debt-free basis for €167 million (approximately $184.2 million).  The acquisition was funded with excess cash and borrowings under the Company’s existing revolving credit facility.  See Note 8 for additional detail on the revolving credit facility.  During the second quarter of 2016, the Company finalized a purchase price adjustment for the settlement of an escrow that reduced the fair value of the net assets acquired to $168.1 million.  As a result of the purchase price adjustment, the carrying amount of goodwill decreased $11.7 million, amortizable intangible assets decreased $6.4 million and the related deferred tax liability decreased $1.9 million.  The impact of the change on the consolidated statements of operations was not material. Nubiola is a worldwide producer of specialty inorganic pigments and the world’s largest producer of Ultramarine Blue. Nubiola also produces specialty Iron Oxides, Chrome Oxide Greens and Corrosion Inhibitors. Nubiola has production facilities in Spain, Colombia, Romania, and India and a joint venture in China.

The information included herein has been prepared based on the allocation of the purchase price using the fair value and useful lives of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which were determined with the assistance of third parties who performed independent valuations using discounted cash flow and comparative market approaches and estimates made by management.

60


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocations:







July 7, 2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Net working capital (1)

$

46,642

Cash and equivalents

19,966

Personal property

39,444

Real property

28,510

Intangible assets

26,757

Other assets and liabilities

(20,733)

Goodwill

27,498

Net assets acquired

$

168,084



(1) Net working capital is defined as current assets, less cash, le ss current liabilities .

The acquired business contributed net sales of $123.2 million and net income attributable to Ferro Corporation of $24 . 4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, and net sales of $56.9 million and net income attributable to Ferro Corporation of $0.3 million for the period from July 7, 2015, to December 31, 2015.  The Company incurred acquisition related costs of $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, which is recorded within Selling, general and administrative expenses, in our consolidated statements of operations.

The fair value of the receivables acquired is $24.5 million, with a gross contractual amount of $25.2 million.  The Company recorded acquired intangible assets subject to amortization of $21.1 million, which is comprised of $5.4 million of customer relationships and $15.7 million of technology/know-how, which will be amortized over 20 years and 15 years, respectively.  The Company recorded acquired indefinite-lived intangible assets of $5.6 million related to trade names and trademarks.  Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purch ase price over the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the acquisition and is a result of anticipated synergies.  Goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

The following unaudited pro froma information represents the consolidated results of the Company as if the Nubiola acquisition occurred as of January 1, 2014:







2015

2014



(unaudited)



(In thousands, except per share amounts)



Net sales

$

1,141,200

$

1,251,266

Net income attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders

$

69,489

$

100,187

Net earnings per share attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders - Basic

$

0.80

$

1.15

Net earnings per share attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders - Diluted

$

0.79

$

1.15



The unaudited pro forma information has been adjusted with the respect to certain aspects of the acquisition to reflect the following:

·

Additional depreciation and amortization expenses that would have been recognized assuming fair value adjustments to the existing Nubiola assets acquired, including intangible assets and fixed assets.

·

Elimination of revenue and costs of goods sold for sales from Nubiola to the Company, which would be eliminated as intercompany transactions for Nubiola and the Company on a consolidated basis.

·

Increased interest expense due to additional borrowings to fund the acquisition.

·

Acquisition-related costs, which were included in the Company’s results.

·

Adjustments for the income tax effect of the pro forma adjustments related to the acquisition.

61


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

Thermark

In February 2015, the Company acquired TherMark Holdings, Inc., a leader in laser making technology, for a cash purchase price of $5.5 million.  The Company recorded $4.6 million of amortizable intangible assets, $2.5 million of goodwill, $1.7 million of a deferred tax liability related to the amortizable intangible assets, and $0.1 million of net working capital on our consolidated balance sheet.

Vetriceramici

In 2014, Ferro Coatings Italy S.R.L., a 100% owned subsidiary of Ferro, acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares and voting interest of Vetriceramici S.p.A. (“Vetriceramici”) for a purchase price of €87.2 million in cash, or $108.9 million, based on the exchange rate on the closing date of Dec ember 1, 2014 . Vetriceramici is an Italian manufacturing, marketing and distribution group that offers a range of products to its customers for the production of ceramic tiles, with some diversification in the glass sector.  Vetriceramici has manufacturing facilities in Italy and Mexico, a mixing plant in Poland and research and development and sales offices in Italy and Turkey.

The acquired business contributed net sales of $53.7 million and net income attributable to Ferro Corporation of $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, and net sales of $60.1 million and net income attributable to Ferro Corporation of $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.  The acquired business contributed net sales of $4.1 million and net loss attributable to Ferro of $0.6 million from the date of the acquisition through December 31, 2014. The Company incurred acquisition costs of $1.4 million and $1.7 million during the year s ended December 31, 2015 , and December 31, 2014, respectively, which is included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.

The information included herein has been prepared based on the allocation of the purchase price using the fair value and useful lives of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which were determined with the assistance of third parties who performed independent valuations using discounted cash flow and comparative market approaches and estimates made by management.

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocations:









December 1, 2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Net working capital (1)

$

27,055

Real property

8,291

Personal property

12,204

Other assets and liabilities

(13,169)

Intangible assets

42,060

Goodwill

32,431

Net assets acquired

$

108,872



(1) Net working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.

The fair value of the receivables acquired is $26.0 million, with a gross contractual amount of $27.0 mi llion. The Company recorded acquired intangible assets subject to amortization of $37.9 million, which is comprised of $27.8 million of customer relationships and $10.1 millio n of technology/know-how, which are amortized over 20 and 10 years, respecti vely.  The Company recorded acquired indefinite-lived intangible assets of $4.2 million related to trade names and trademarks. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the acquisition and is a result of anticipated synergies. Goodwill has been allocated to the Performance Coatings and Performance Colors and Glass segments of $31.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively.  The amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible for tax purposes is $12.4 million.

62


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

Other

In July 2014, the Company acquired certain commercial assets of a reseller of our porcelain enamel products in Turkey for a cash purchase price of $6.7 million, which is recorded in Intangible assets, net on the consolidated balance sheets.

5. Inventories



Inventory at December 31 consisted of the following:







2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Raw materials

$

72,943

$

56,291

Work in process

38,859

33,099

Finished goods

118,045

95,464

Total inventories

$

229,847

$

184,854

In the production of some of our products, we use precious metals, some of which we obtain from financial institutions under consignment agreements with terms of one year or less. The financial institutions retain ownership of the precious metals and charge us fees based on the amounts we consign. These fees were $0.8 milli on for 2016 , $0.8 mill ion for 2015 , and $0 . 8 million for 2014 . We had on hand precious metals owned by participants in our precious metals consignment program of $ 28 . 7 million at December 31, 2016 , and $20 . 5 million at December 31, 2015 , measured at fair value based on market prices for identical assets.

6. Property, Plant and Equipment



Property, Plant and Equipment at December 31 consisted of the following:







2016

2015





(Dollars in thousands)



Land

$

37,136

$

31,009

Buildings

171,809

167,653

Machinery and equipment

477,376

468,485

Construction in progress

15,063

14,544

Total property, plant and equipment

701,384

681,691

Total accumulated depreciation

(439,358)

(421,262)

Property, plant and equipment, net

$

262,026

$

260,429

Depreciation expense was $ 37 . 9 million for 2016 , $36 . 2 million for 2015 , and $31 . 3 million for 2014 . Noncash investing activities for capital expenditures, consisting of new capital leases during the year and unpaid capital expenditure liabilities at year end, were $ 5 . 0 million for 2016 , $6 . 6 million for 2015 , and $7 . 9 million for 2014 .

As discussed in Note 3 - Discontinued Operations , our Europe-bas ed Polymer Additives assets have been classified as held-for-sale under ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment until the ultimate sale of the business in 2016. As such, at each historical reporting date, these assets were tested for impairment comparing the fair value of the assets less costs to sell to the carrying value.  The fair value was determined using both the market approach and income approach, utilizing Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy, which indicated the fair value less costs to sell was less than the carrying value .  As a result of th e analysis, the assets had a carrying value that exceeded fair value, resulting in impairment charges totaling $50.9 million, $11.8 million and $21.6 million that are included in ( Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, in our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended Decembe r 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 , respectively.

63


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

The following table present information about the Company’s impairment charges on assets that were measured on a fair value basis for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The table also indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used by the Company to determine the fair value:









Fair Value Measurements Using

Total

Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

(Losses)



(Dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2016

$

$

$

$

$

(50,902)

December 31, 2015

$

$

$

33,711

$

33,711

$

(11,792)

December 31, 2014

$

$

$

37,400

$

37,400

$

(21,566)



The inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are classified into the following categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

During 2016, we recorded a $3.9 mil lion gain on sale from the sale proceeds of a closed site in Australia which was recorded in Miscellaneous (income) expense, net in our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

During 2014, we sold non-operating real estate assets located in South Plainfield, New Jersey and in Criciuma, Brazil, which resulted in gains of $1.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.  The gains on sale were offset by lo sses associated with sale of our corporate related real estate and the write-off of tenant improvements of $3.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively.  The net loss of $3.3 million related to these transactions is recorded in Miscellaneous (income) expense, net in our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.





64


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Details and activity in the Company’s goodwill by segment are as follows :











Pigments,

Performance



Performance

Powders and

Colors and



Coatings

Oxides

Glass

Total



(Dollars in thousands)

Goodwill, net at December 31, 2014

$

31,591

9,676

52,466

$

93,733

Acquisitions

14,305

(1)

39,151

(2)

2,477

(3)

55,933

Other adjustments

(462)

(462)

Foreign currency adjustments

(1,950)

(33)

(1,552)

(3,535)

Goodwill, net at December 31, 2015

43,484

48,794

53,391

145,669

Acquisitions

(7,756)

(4), (5)

28,332

(5)

20,576

Impairments

(13,198)

(13,198)

Foreign currency adjustments

(2,196)

(617)

(1,938)

(4,751)

Goodwill, net at December 31, 2016

$

28,090

$

40,421

$

79,785

$

148,296



(1) During 2015, the Company recorded goodwill related to the Al Salomi acquisition.  Refer to Note 4 for additional details.

(2) During 2015, the Company recorded goodwill related to the Nubiola acquisition.  Refer to Note 4 for additional details.

(3) During 2015, the Company recorded goodwill related to the TherMark acquisition.  Refer to Note 4 for additional details.

(4) During 2016, the Company recorded a purchase price adjustment within the measurement period for goodwill related to the Nubiola acquisition.  Refer to Note 4 for additional details.

(5) During 2016, the Company recorded goodwill related to the Delta Performance Products, Ferer, Pinturas, ESL and Cappelle acquisitions.  Refer to Note 4 for additional details.











December 31,

December 31,



2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Goodwill, gross

$

206,763

$

190,938

Accumulated impairment losses

(58,467)

(45,269)

Goodwill, net

$

148,296

$

145,669



The significant assumptions and ranges of assumptions we used in our impairment analysis of goodwill follow:









Significant Assumptions

2016

2015

Weighted-average cost of capital

10.75% - 13.5

%

11.5% - 12.75

%

Residual growth rate

3.0

%

3.0

%

D uring the fourth quarter of 2016 and 2015 , we performed our annual goodwill impairment testing. The test entailed comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their carrying value as of the meas urement date of October 31, 2016, and October 31, 2015 , respectively.  We performed step 1 of the annual impairment test as defined in ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. During our October 31, 2016, goodwill impairment assessment, an impairment indicator was identified within our Tile Coating Systems reporting unit, a component of our Performance Coatings segment. The impairment indicator was indicative of the performance of the reporting unit in total. We compared the carrying value against the fair value, and determined that the carrying value exceed ed the fair value.  As a result , an impairment loss of $13.2 million has been included in restructuring and impairment charges in the consolidated

65


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 .  The Company is not aware of any events or circumstances that occurred between the annual assessment date and December 31, 2016 which would further require a goodwill impairment test .









Fair Value Measurements Using

Total

Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

(Losses)



(Dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2016

$

$

$

$

$

(13,198)



A mortizable intangible assets at December 31 consisted of the following:







Estimated



Economic Life

2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Gross amortizable intangible assets:

Patents

10 - 16 years

$

5,147

$

5,229

Land rights

20 - 40 years

4,746

4,947

Technology/know-how and other

1- 30 years

84,837

66,558

Customer relationships

12 - 20 years

80,153

46,320

Total gross amortizable intangible assets

174,883

123,054

Accumulated amortization:

Patents

(4,981)

(4,880)

Land rights

(2,698)

(2,671)

Technology/know-how and other

(34,775)

(16,473)

Customer relationships

(5,311)

(2,234)

Total accumulated amortization

(47,765)

(26,258)

Amortizable intangible assets, net

$

127,118

$

96,796

We amortize amortizable intangible assets on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets was $ 8.9 million for 2016 , $4.9 milli on for 2015 , and $2.3 million for 2014 . Aggregate amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets is expected to be approxi mately $11.4 million for 2017, $11.1 million for 2018, $10.7 million for 2019, $9.5 million for 2020, and $8.4 million for 2021.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets at December 31 consisted of the following:









2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Indefinite-lived intangibles assets:

Trade names and trademarks

$

10,732

$

9,837





66


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

8. Debt and Other Financing

Loans payable and current portion of long-term debt at December 31 consisted of the following:













2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Loans payable

$

11,452

$

2,749

Current portion of long-term debt

5,858

4,697

Loans payable and current portion of long-term debt

$

17,310

$

7,446



Long-term debt at December 31 consisted of the following:









2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)



Revolving credit facility

$

311,555

$

170,000

Term loan facility, net of unamortized issuance costs

239,530

291,717

Capital lease obligations

3,720

4,478

Other notes

8,228

4,610

Total long-term debt

563,033

470,805

Current portion of long-term debt

(5,858)

(4,697)

Long-term debt, less current portion

$

557,175

$

466,108





The annual maturities of long-term debt for each of the five years after December 31, 2016 , are as follows (in thousands):







2017

$

6,105

2018

5,612

2019

316,813

2020

4,601

2021

232,176

Thereafter

2,634

Total maturities of long-term debt

567,941

Unamortized issuance costs on Term loan facility

(3,720)

Imputed interest and executory costs on capitalized lease obligations

(1,188)

Total long-term debt

$

563,033



Credit Facility

On July 31, 2014, the Company entered into a credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders to refinance the majority of its then outstanding debt.  The Credit Facility consisted of a $200 million secured revolving line of credit with a term of five years and a $300 million secured term loan facility with a term of seven years. The Credit Facility replaces the prior $250 million revolving credit facility (described below) and provided funding to repurchase the 7.875% Senior Notes (descried below). On January 25, 2016, the Company amended the Credit Facility by entering into the Incremental Assumption Agreement (the “Incremental Agreement”) to increase the revolving line of credit commitment amount from $200 million to $300 million.  The Company then used a portion of the increase in the revolving line of credit to repay $50 million of the term loan facility. The Credit Facility was amended and a portion of the outstanding term loan was repaid to increase the amount of total liquidity available under the Credit Facility and reduce the total cost of borrowings. On August 29, 2016, the Company amended the Credit Facility by entering into the Second Incremental Assumption

67


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

Agreement (the “Second Incremental Agreement”) to increase the revolving line of credit commitment amount to $400 million. The increase in the revolving line of credit commitment will be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions.

Principal payments on the term loan facility of $0.75 million quarterly, are payable commencing December 31, 2014, with the remaining balance due on the maturity date.  At December 31, 2016 , after taking into account all prior quarterly payments and the $50 million prepayment that was made in January 2016, the Company had borrowed $243.3 million under the term loan facility at an annual rate of 4.0% .  There are no additional borrowings available under the term loan facility.

Certain of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries have guaranteed the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility and such obligations are secured by (a) substantially all of the personal property of the Company and the U.S. subsidiary guarantors and (b) a pledge of 100% of the stock of most of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries and 65% of most of the stock of the Company’s first tier foreign subsidiaries.

Interest Rate – Term Loan:  The interest rates applicable to the term loans will be, at the Company’s option, equal to either a base rate or a London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rate plus, in both cases, an applicable margin.

·

The base rate will be the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% , (ii) syndication agent’s prime rate or (iii) the daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00% .

·

The applicable margin for base rate loans is 2.25% .

·

The LIBOR rate will be set as quoted by Bloomberg and shall not be less than 0.75% .

·

The applicable margin for LIBOR rate loans is 3.25% .

·

For LIBOR rate loans, the Company may choose to set the duration on individual borrowings for periods of one, two, three or six months, with the interest rate based on the applicable LIBOR rate for the corresponding duration.

Interest Rate – Revolving Credit Line:  The interest rates applicable to loans under the revolving credit line will be, at the Company’s option, equal to either a base rate or a LIBOR rate plus an applicable variable margin.  The variable margin will be based on the ratio of (a) the Company’s total consolidated debt outstanding at such time to (b) the Company’s consolidated EBITDA computed for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters most recently ended.

·

The base rate will be the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% , (ii) syndication agents’s prime rate or (iii) the daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00% .

·

The applicable margin for base rate loans will vary between 1.50% and 2.00% .

·

The LIBOR rate will be set as quoted by Bloomberg for U.S. Dollars.

·

The applicable margin for LIBOR Rate Loans will vary between 2.50% and 3.00% .

·

For LIBOR rate loans, the Company may choose to set the duration on individual borrowings for periods of one, two, three or six months, with the interest rate based on the applicable LIBOR rate for the corresponding duration.

At December 31, 2016 , the Company had borrowed $311.6 millio n under the revolving credit facilities at a weighted average interest rate of 3.5% . The borrowing on the revolving credit line was used to fund the acquisitions , the share repurchase programs, and for other general business purposes. After reductions for outstanding letters of credit secured by these facilities, we had $84.1 mi llion of additional borrowing s available under the revolving credit facilities at December 31, 2016 .

The Credit Facility contains customary restrictive covenants including, but not limited to, limitations on use of loan proceeds, limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock, limitations on acquisitions and dispositions, and limitations on certain types of investments.  The Credit Facility also contains standard provisions relating to conditions of borrowing and customary events of default, including the non-payment of obligations by the Company and the bankruptcy of the Company.

68


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

Specific to the revolving credit facility, the Company is subject to financial covenants regarding the Company’s outstanding net indebtedness and interest coverage ratios.

If an event of default occurs, all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. The Company was in compliance with the covenants , as defined within our Credit Facility , as of September 30, 2016 . The financial covenants are not applicable as of December 31, 2016, due to the refinancing of the Credit Facility which is described below .

New Credit Facility

On February 14, 2017, the Company entered into a new credit facility (the “ New Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders to refinance its then outstanding credit facility debt and to provide liquidity for ongoing working capital requirements and general corporate purposes .

The New Credit Facility consists of a $400 million secured revolving line of credit with a term of five years, a $357.5 million secured term loan facility with a term of seven years and a €250 million secured euro term loan facility with a term of seven years. The term loans are payable in equal quarterly installments in an amount equal to 0.25% of the original principal amount of the term loans, with the remaining balance due on the maturity date thereof.  In addition, the Company is required, on an annual basis, to make a prepayment of term loans until they are fully paid and then to the revolving loans in an amount equal to a portion of the Company’s excess cash flow, as calculated pursuant to the New Credit Facility.

Subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, the Company can request additional commitments under the revolving line of credit or term loans in the aggregate principal amount of up to $250 million to the extent that existing or new lenders agree to provide such additional commitments and/or term loans and certain additional debt subject to satisfaction of certain covenant levels.

Certain of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries have guaranteed the Company’s obligations under the New Credit Facility and such obligations are secured by (a) substantially all of the personal property of the Company and the U.S. subsidiary guarantors and (b) a pledge of 100% of the stock of certain of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries and 65% of the stock of certain of the Company’s direct foreign subsidiaries.

Interest Rate – Term Loans:  The interest rates applicable to the U.S. term loans will be, at the Company’s option, equal to either a base rate or a LIBOR rate plus, in both cases, an applicable margin.  The interest rates applicable to the Euro term loans will be a Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“ EURIBOR ”) rate plus an applicable margin.

·

The base rate for U.S. term loans will be the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% , (ii) syndication agent ’s prime rate or (iii) the daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00% .  The applicable margin for base rate loans is 1.50% .

·

The LIBOR rate for U.S. term loans shall not be less than 0.75% and the applicable margin for LIBOR rate U.S. term loans is 2.50% .

·

The EURIBOR rate for Euro term loans shall not be less than 0% and the applicable margin for EURIBOR rate loans is 2.75% .

·

For LIBOR rate term loans and EURIBOR rate term loans, the Company may choose to set the duration on individual borrowings for periods of one, two, three or six months, with the interest rate based on the applicable LIBOR rate or EURIBOR rate, as applicable, for the corresponding duration.

Interest Rate – Revolving Credit Line:  The interest rates applicable to loans under the revolving credit line will be, at the Company’s option, equal to either a base rate or a LIBOR rate plus, in both cases, an applicable variable margin.  The variable margin will be based on the ratio of (a) the Company’s total consolidated debt outstanding at such time to (b) the Company’s consolidated EBITDA computed for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters most recently ended.

69


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

·

The base rate for revolving loans will be the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% , (ii) syndication agent ’s prime rate or (iii) the daily LIBOR rate plus 1.00% .  The applicable margin for base rate loans will vary between 0.75% to 1.75% .

·

The LIBOR rate for revolving loans shall not be less than 0% and the applicable margin for LIBOR rate revolving loans will vary between 1.75% and 2.75% .

·

For LIBOR rate revolving loans, the Company may choose to set the duration on individual borrowings for periods of one, two, three or six months, with the interest rate based on the applicable LIBOR rate for the corresponding duration.

The New Credit Facility contains customary restrictive covenants including, but not limited to, limitations on use of loan proceeds, limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock, limitations on acquisitions and dispositions, and limitations on certain types of investments. The New Credit Facility also contains standard provisions relating to conditions of borrowing and customary events of default, including the non-payment of obligations by the Company and the bankruptcy of the Company.

Specific to the revolving credit facility, the Company is subject to a financial covenant regarding the Company’s maximum leverage ratio.

If an event of default occurs, all amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable.

7.875% Senior Notes and 2013 Revolving Credit Facility

In conjunction with the redemption of the 7.875% Senior Notes and the termination of the 2013 Revolving Credit Facility in the third quarter of 2014, the Company recorded a charge of $14.4 million, which is comprised of a repurchase premium of $10.5 million and the write-off of unamortized issuance costs of $3.9 million. This charge is included within Loss on debt extinguishment in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Other Financing Arrangements

We maintain other lines of credit to provide global flexibility for Ferro’s short-term liquidity requirements. These facilities are uncommitted lines for our international operations and totaled $ 7.3 million at December 31, 2016, and $8. 0 million at December 31, 2015. The unused portions of these lines provided additional liquidity of $ 6.7 million at December 31, 2016 , and $7. 3 million at December 31, 2015 .

70


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

9. Financial Instruments

The following table presents financial instrument assets (liabilities) at the carrying amount, fair value and classification within the fair value hierarchy:









December 31, 2016



Carrying

Fair Value



Amount

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3



(Dollars in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents

$

45,582

$

45,582

$

45,582

$

$

Loans payable

(11,452)

(11,452)

(11,452)

Revolving credit facility

(311,555)

(318,389)

(318,389)

Term loan facility (1)

(239,530)

(252,052)

(252,052)

Other long-term notes payable

(8,228)

(7,315)

(7,315)

Foreign currency forward contracts, net

350

350

350





December 31, 2015



Carrying

Fair Value



Amount

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3



(Dollars in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents

$

58,380

$

58,380

$

58,380

$

$

Loans payable

(2,749)

(2,749)

(2,749)

Revolving credit facility

(170,000)

(169,019)

(169,019)

Term loan facility (1)

(291,717)

(297,552)

(297,552)

Other long-term notes payable

(4,610)

(3,956)

(3,956)

Foreign currency forward contracts, net

(1,207)

(1,207)

(1,207)



(1) The carrying value of the term loan facility is net of unamortized debt issuance costs.

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents are based on the fair values of identical assets. The fair values of loans payable are based on the present value of expected future cash flows and approximate their carrying amounts due to the short periods to maturity.  The fair values of the revolving credit facility, the term loan facility and the other long- term notes payable are based on the present value of expected future cash flows and interest rates that would be currently available to the company for issuance of similar types of debt instruments with similar terms remaining maturities adjusted for the Company’s non-performance risk.

Derivative Instruments

Foreign currency forward contracts. We manage foreign currency risks principally by entering into forward contracts to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on transactions. These forward contracts are not formally designated as hedges. Gains and losses on these foreign currency forward contracts are netted with gains and losses from currency fluctuations on transactions arising from international trade, primarily intercompany transactions, and reported as Foreign currency losses, net in the consolidated statements of operations. Net foreign currency loss was approximately $12.9 million in 2016 , $4.5 million in 2015 , and $1.2 million in 2014 , which is primarily comprised of the foreign exchange impact on transactions in countries where it is not economically feasible for us to enter into hedging arrangements and hedging inefficiencies, such as timing of transactions.  In 2016, the net foreign currency loss includes a $9.1 million loss from the devaluation of the Egyptian pound and a loss on a foreign contract related to the Euro dominated purchase of the Cappelle acquisition of $1.2 million.  I n 2015, the net foreign currency loss includes a loss on a foreign currency contract related to the Euro dominated purchase of the Nubiola acquisition of $2.7 million. We incurred net losses of $2.7 million in 2016 , net gains of $8.3 million in 2015 and net gains of $10.5 million in 2014 , arising from the change in fair value of our fin ancial instruments, which are netted against the related net gains and losses on international trade transactions. The fair values of these contracts are based on market prices for comparable contracts. The notional amount of foreign currency forward contracts was $338.2 million at December 31, 2016 , and $ 338.4 million at December 31, 2015 .

71


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

The following table presents the effect on our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively, of foreign currency forward contracts:







Amount of (Loss) Gain



Recognized in Earnings





2016

2015

2014

Location of (Loss) Gain in Earnings





(Dollars in thousands)

Foreign currency forward contracts

$

(2,714)

$

8,304

$

10,526

Foreign currency losses, net







The following table presents the fair value on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31 of foreign currency forward contracts:









2016

2015

Balance Sheet Location



(Dollars in thousands)

Asset derivatives:

Foreign currency forward contracts

$

1,854

$

913

Other current assets

Liability derivatives:

Foreign currency forward contracts

$

(1,504)

$

(2,120)

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

10. Income Taxes



Income tax expense (benefit) is based on our earnings (losses) from continuing operations before income taxes as presented in the following table:















2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

U.S.

$

7,416

$

10,520

$

(69,868)

Foreign

55,029

44,263

27,032

Total

$

62,445

$

54,783

$

(42,836)



Our income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations consists of the following components:









2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Current:

U.S. federal

$

4,616

$

146

$

(25,712)

Foreign

24,675

21,041

12,181

State and local

28

41

(1,272)

Total current

29,319

21,228

(14,803)

Deferred:

U.S. federal

379

(56,521)

1,168

Foreign

(11,830)

(3,764)

(20,684)

State and local

(6,043)

92

Total deferred

(11,451)

(66,328)

(19,424)

Total income tax expense (benefit)

$

17,868

$

(45,100)

$

(34,227)



72


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

In addition, income tax (benefit) expense that we allocated directly to Ferro Corporation shareholders’ equity is detailed in the following table:











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Postretirement benefit liability adjustments

$

30

$

32

$

(45)

Stock options exercised

(2,355)

(835)

Total income tax (benefit) expense allocated to Ferro Corporation shareholders' equity

$

(2,325)

$

32

$

(880)



A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and our effective tax rate follows:











2016

2015

2014

U.S. federal statutory income tax rate

35.0

%

35.0

%

35.0

%

Goodwill dispositions and impairments

8.3

(0.2)

0.8

Non-deductible expenses

3.4

3.0

Miscellaneous

3.2

1.7

(6.7)

Uncertain tax positions

1.7

4.3

(4.3)

Net adjustment of prior-year accrual, including tax audit settlements

1.5

0.2

(8.1)

U.S. tax costs of foreign dividends

0.6

1.7

4.7

Foreign substitute tax payment

(3.9)

Domestic production activities deduction

(0.2)

3.1

State taxes

(0.7)

0.6

5.4

Tax rate changes

(0.7)

3.4

(4.6)

Foreign currency

(1.6)

2.3

(0.1)

Notional interest deduction

(2.8)

(2.8)

Other tax credits

(2.9)

(2.3)

7.8

Adjustment of valuation allowances

(7.4)

(118.4)

30.7

Foreign tax rate difference

(8.8)

(6.9)

16.2

Effective tax rate

28.6

%

(82.3)

%

79.9

%



We have refundable income taxes of $9.2 million at December 31, 2016 , and $5.6 million at December 31, 2015 , classified as Other receivables on our consolidated balance sheets. We also have income taxes payable of $15.8 million at December 31, 2016 , and $8.6 million at December 31, 2015 , classified as Accrued expenses and other current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.

73


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 were:









2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Deferred tax assets:

Pension and other benefit programs

$

51,189

$

46,348

Foreign operating loss carryforwards

30,352

35,925

Accrued liabilities

20,942

19,036

U.S foreign tax credit carryforwards

19,753

23,620

Other credit carryforwards

11,277

13,379

Other

5,643

3,955

State and local operating loss carryforwards

3,975

4,540

Currency differences

3,138

Inventories

1,962

2,454

Allowance for doubtful accounts

1,744

1,701

Domestic operating loss carryforwards

1,837

Capitalized interest

1,749

Capitalized research costs

552

Total deferred tax assets

149,975

155,096

Deferred tax liabilities:

Property, plant and equipment and intangibles -- depreciation and amortization

28,418

26,051

Other

3,091

2,475

Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries

779

616

Total deferred tax liabilities

32,288

29,142

Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance

117,687

125,954

Valuation allowance

(37,354)

(55,043)

Net deferred tax assets

$

80,333

$

70,911



The amounts of foreign operating loss carryforwards, foreign tax credit carryforwards, and other credit carryforwards included in the table of temporary differences are net of reserves for unrecognized tax benefits.

At December 31, 2016 , we had $3.1 m illion of tax benefits from domestic operating loss carryforwards and $31.6 million from foreign operating loss carryforwards, some of which can be carried forward indefinitely and others that expire in one to twenty years. At December 31, 2016, we had $ 41.6 million of tax benefits from tax credit carryforwards, some of which can be carried forward indefinitely. These operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards expire as follows:











Operating Loss

Tax Credit



Carryforwards

Carryforwards

Expiring in:

(Dollars in thousands)

2017

$

4,694

$

6,935

2018-2022

11,281

11,616

2023-2027

2,723

14,938

2028-2032

1,992

5,359

2033-2037

2,232

813

2038-Indefinitely

11,739

1,908

Total

$

34,661

$

41,569

We assess the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize the existing deferred tax assets. A significant piece of objective negative evidence evaluated by jurisdiction was the cumulative loss

74


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

incurred over the three-year period ended December 31, 2016 . Such objective evidence limits the ability to consider other subjective evidence such as our projections for future income.

Based on this assessment, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $37.3 million in order to measure only the portion of the deferred tax assets that more likely than not will be realized. The most significant items that changed the valuation allowance from 2015 to 2016 primarily related to the release of valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets that were utilized in the current year, the recording of a valuation allowance to reduce the amount of deferred tax assets to a balance more likely than not to be realized , the removal of a valuation allowance deemed no longer necessary based upon the expiration of the deferred tax asset or removal for jurisdictions which were liquidated in the current year and no longer necessary, and the release of a valuation allowance based upon a change in the current and expected future years operating profits which will result in continued profitability that will more likely than not allow for the utilization of a deferred tax asset balance .

We classified net deferred incom e tax assets as of December 31 as detailed in the following table:









2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Current assets

$

$

12,088

Non-current assets

106,454

87,385

Current liabilities

(1,074)

Non-current liabilities

(26,121)

(27,488)

Net deferred tax assets

$

80,333

$

70,911



Activity and balances of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized below:











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at beginning of year

$

34,541

$

36,879

$

38,739

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

1,445

2,664

3,411

Additions for tax positions of prior years

170

4,136

1,908

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

(2,827)

(1,135)

(2,551)

Reductions as a results of expiring statutes of limitations

(2,718)

(6,259)

(700)

Foreign currency adjustments

(526)

(1,744)

(1,953)

Settlements with taxing authorities

(1,975)

Balance at end of year

$

30,085

$

34,541

$

36,879

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective rate was $11.0 million at December 31, 2016, and $11.0 million at December 31, 2015. The Company recognizes interest accrued and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of income tax expense. The Company recognized $0.1 million of expense in 2016, $0.6 million of expense in 2015, and $0.9 million of benefit in 2014 for interest, net of tax, and penalties. The Company accrued $3.1 million at December 31, 2016, and $3.1 million at December 31, 2015, for payment of interest, net of tax, and penalties.

We anticipate that $2.8 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest and penalties, may be reversed within the next 12 months. These liabilities relate to international tax issues and are expected to reverse due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations periods and the anticipation of the closure of tax examinations.

The Company conducts business globally, and, as a result, the U.S. parent company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the U.S. parent company and its subsidiaries are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world. With few exceptions, we are not subject to federal, state, local or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 200 5 .

75


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

At December 31, 2016, we provided $0.8 million for deferred income taxes on $7.8 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. We have not provided deferred income taxes on undistributed earnings of approximately $83.7 million, since we intend to indefinitely reinvest the earnings and it is not practicable to estimate the additional taxes that might be payable on the eventual remittance of such earnings.

11. Contingent Liabilities

The Company had bank guarantees and standby letters of credit issued by financial institutions that totaled $6.4 million at December 31, 2016 , and $8.1 million at December 31, 2015 . These agreements primarily relate to Ferro’s insurance programs, foreign energy purchase contracts and foreign tax payments. If the Company fails to perform its obligations, the guarantees and letters of credit may be drawn down by their holders, and we would be liable to the financial institutions for the amounts drawn.

We have recorded environmental liabilities of $7.2 million at December 31, 2016 , and $7.4 million at December 31, 2015 , for costs associated with the remediation of certain of our properties that have been contaminated. The balance at December 31, 2016 , and December 31, 2015 , was primarily comprised of liabilities related to a non-operating facility in Brazil, and for retained environmental obligations related to a site in the United States that was part of the sale of our North American and Asian metal powders produc t lines in 2013. The costs include legal and consulting fees, site studies, the design and implementation of remediation plans, post-remediation monitoring, and related activities. The ultimate liability could be affected by numerous uncertainties, including the extent of contamination found, the required period of monitoring and the ultimate cost of required remediation.

In 2013, the Supreme Court in Argentina ruled unfavorably related to certain export taxes associated with a divested operation.  As a result of this ruling, we have recorded a liability of $8.7 million at December 31, 2016 , and $7.8 million at December 31, 2015 . The liability that has been recorded represents our estimate of the amount that is probable and estimable.

There are various lawsuits and claims pending against the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. We do not currently expect the ultimate liabilities, if any, and expenses related to suc h lawsuits and claims to materially affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

12. Retirement Benefits

Defined Benefit Pension Plans









U.S. Pension Plans

Non-U.S. Plans



2016

2015

2014

2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Service cost

$

16

$

17

$

16

$

1,372

$

1,478

$

1,767

Interest cost

15,552

18,718

19,746

3,319

3,560

5,105

Expected return on plan assets

(19,735)

(29,168)

(28,139)

(1,712)

(2,623)

(3,151)

Amortization of prior service cost

11

12

12

37

259

61

Mark-to-market actuarial net losses

9,127

18,807

71,583

11,180

5,085

17,494

Curtailment and settlement effects (gains) losses

(12,640)

688

35

(123)

Special termination benefits

330

35

40

Net periodic benefit cost (credit)

$

4,971

$

(4,254)

$

63,218

$

15,214

$

7,829

$

21,193

Weighted-average assumptions:

Discount rate

4.70

%

4.25

%

5.25

%

3.12

%

2.72

%

4.12

%

Rate of compensation increase

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.16

%

3.28

%

2.88

%

Expected return on plan assets

8.20

%

8.20

%

8.20

%

3.41

%

3.50

%

4.44

%





In 2016, the mark-to-market actuarial net loss on the U.S. pension plans of $9.1 million consisted of a charge of $5.7 million to remeasure the liability ba s ed on a lower discount rate compared with the prior year, and a $3.4 million of loss from expected returns on

76


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

plan assets exceeding actual returns .  The mark-to-market actuarial net loss of $11.2 million for non-U.S. plans was primarily driven by remeasurement of the respective liabilities at lower discount rates.

In 2015, the mark-to-market actuarial net loss on the U.S. pension plans of $18.8 million primarily consisted of $20.8 million of loss from expected returns on plan assets exceeding actual returns , partially offset by an increase in the discount rate compared with the prior year .  The mark-to-market actuarial net loss of $5.1 million for non-U.S. plans primarily consisted of $11.0 million of loss from expected returns on plan assets exceeding actual returns, partially offset by an increase in the discount rate . In 2015, the Company initiated and executed on a buyout of terminated vested participants in our U.S. defined benefit pension plan. In October 2015, the buyout was funded and reduced plan assets and liability by $71 million and resulted in a settlement gain of $12.6 million.

In 2014, the mark-to-market actuarial net loss on the U.S. pension plans of $71.6 million consisted of $69.8 million of losses due to a decrease in the discount rate compared with the prior year and a change in the underlying mortality assumption , in addition to $1.8 million of loss from expected returns on plan assets exceeding actual returns. In 2014, the discount rate used to value the liability declined by 100 basis points compared with the prior year, thereby increasing the value of the liability by $50.3 million.  Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company adopted the use of new mortality tables within its valuation assumptions, which increased the liability. The new mortality tables reflect underlying increases in life expectancy of the participants, thus driving longer benefit payment periods. The impact of the change in mortality assumption on the U.S. pension liability was an increase of $17.8 million. The mark-to-market actuarial net loss of $17.5 million for non-U.S. plans primarily consisted of $30.8 million of loss es due to decrease s in the respective plans’ discount rate s and the change in mortality assumptions compared with 2014 , partially offset by $13.2 million of gains from actual returns on plan assets exceeding expectations .

77


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)











U.S. Pension Plans

Non-U.S. Pension Plans



2016

2015

2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Change in benefit obligation

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

$

346,951

$

454,030

$

123,764

$

146,706

Service cost

16

17

1,372

1,478

Interest cost

15,552

18,718

3,319

3,560

Curtailments

Amendments

189

Settlements

(144)

(71,290)

(34,528)

(579)

Special termination benefits

330

35

Plan participants' contributions

54

20

Benefits paid

(22,918)

(23,144)

(3,195)

(3,179)

Actuarial loss (gain)

5,745

(31,380)

20,490

(11,142)

Exchange rate effect

(8,116)

(13,324)

Benefit obligation at end of year

$

345,202

$

346,951

$

103,490

$

123,764

Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year

$

345,202

$

346,951

$

93,401

$

118,680

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

$

278,735

$

381,147

$

63,649

$

82,345

Actual return on plan assets

16,354

(8,379)

10,977

(13,638)

Employer contributions

522

401

3,060

4,979

Plan participants' contributions

54

20

Benefits paid

(22,918)

(23,144)

(3,195)

(3,179)

Effect of settlements

(144)

(71,290)

(34,746)

(579)

Exchange rate effect

(6,116)

(6,299)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$

272,549

$

278,735

$

33,683

$

63,649

Amounts recognized in the balance sheet:

Other non-current assets

$

$

$

484

$

841

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

(579)

(729)

(2,070)

(1,834)

Postretirement and pension liabilities

(72,074)

(67,487)

(68,221)

(59,122)

Funded status

$

(72,653)

$

(68,216)

$

(69,807)

$

(60,115)



During 2016, the Company settled a pension obligation in Great Britain for an amount of $32.2 million, which is included in settlements for the Non-U.S. pension .





78


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)







U.S. Pension Plans

Non-U.S. Pension Plans



2016

2015

2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31:

Discount rate

4.40

%

4.70

%

2.24

%

3.12

%

Rate of compensation increase

N/A

N/A

3.14

%

3.16

%

Pension plans with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

Benefit obligations

$

345,202

$

346,951

$

73,903

$

66,291

Plan assets

272,549

278,735

3,612

5,336

Pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

Projected benefit obligations

$

345,202

$

346,951

$

73,393

$

65,777

Accumulated benefit obligations

345,202

346,951

63,538

60,888

Plan assets

272,549

278,735

3,179

4,881



Activity and balances in Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to defined benefit pension plans are summarized below:









U.S. Pension Plans

Non-U.S. Pension Plans



2016

2015

2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Prior service (cost):

Balance at beginning of year

$

(18)

$

(30)

$

(425)

$

(636)

Amounts recognized as net periodic benefit costs

11

12

37

259

Exchange rate effects

123

(48)

Balance at end of year

$

(7)

$

(18)

$

(265)

$

(425)

Estimated amounts to be amortized in 2017

$

(7)

$

(37)

The overall investment objective for defined benefit pension plan assets is to achieve the highest level of investment return that is compatible with prudent investment practices, asset class risk and current and future benefit obligations of the plans. Based on the potential risks and expected returns of various asset classes, the Company establishes asset allocation ranges for major asset classes. For U.S. plans, the target allocations are 35% fixed income, 60% equity, and 5% other investments. For non-U.S. plans, the target allocations are 75% fixed income, 24% equity, and 1% other investments. The Company invests in funds and with asset managers that track broad investment indices. The equity funds generally capture the returns of the equity markets in th e U.S., Europe, Japan, and Asia Pacific and also reflect various investment styles, such as growth, value, and large or small capitalization. The fixed income funds generally capture the returns of government and investment-grade corporate fixed income securities in the U.S. and Europe and also reflect various durations of these securities.

We base the expected return on plan assets at the beginning of the year on the weighted-average expected return for the target asset allocations of the major asset classes held by each plan. In determining the expected return, the Company considers both historical performance and an estimate of future long-term rates of return. The Company consults with and considers the opinion of its actuaries in developing appropriate return assumptions.

79


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

The fair values of our pension plan assets at December 31, 2016 , by asset category are as follows:









Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total



(Dollars in thousands)

U.S. plans:

Fixed income:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

3

$

$

$

3

Guaranteed deposits

1,817

1,817

Mutual funds

85,580

85,580

Commingled funds

777

371

1,148

Equities:

U.S. common stocks

4,057

4,057

Mutual funds

156,675

156,675

Commingled funds

1,096

1,096

Real estate

22,173

22,173

Total

$

246,315

$

3,690

$

22,544

$

272,549

Non-U.S. plans

Fixed income:

Guaranteed deposits

$

97

$

726

$

26,332

$

27,155

Mutual funds

365

365

Other

3,679

2,153

5,832

Equities:

Mutual funds

200

200

Real estate

84

84

Other assets

47

47

Total

$

4,388

$

2,879

$

26,416

$

33,683



80


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

The fair values of our pension plan assets at December 31, 2015 , by asset category are as follows:











Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total



(Dollars in thousands)

U.S. plans:

Fixed income:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

44

$

$

$

44

Guaranteed deposits

1,956

1,956

Mutual funds

88,672

88,672

Commingled funds

879

366

1,245

Equities:

U.S. common stocks

3,148

3,148

Mutual funds

162,332

162,332

Commingled funds

1,264

1,264

Real estate

20,074

20,074

Total

$

254,196

$

4,099

$

20,440

$

278,735

Non-U.S. plans

Fixed income:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

299

$

$

$

299

Guaranteed deposits

142

2,148

54,006

56,296

Mutual funds

171

171

Other

4,188

2,267

6,455

Equities:

Mutual funds

319

319

Real estate

59

59

Other assets

50

50

Total

$

5,169

$

4,415

$

54,065

$

63,649

The Company’s U.S. pension plans held 0.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock with a market value of $4.1 million at December 31, 2016 , and 0.3 million shares with a market value of $3.1 million at December 31, 2015 .

Level 3 assets consist primarily of guaranteed deposits and real estate investments. The guaranteed deposits in Level 3 are in the form of contracts with insurance companies that secure the payment of benefits and are valued based on discounted cash flow models using the same discount rate used to value the related plan liabilities. The real estate investments in Level 3 are in the form of commingled funds invested in non-public real estate development and investment companies and are valued based on estimated capitalization factors applied to the earnings streams from portfolio properties and fee income, discounted cash flows of development projects, and estimated market values of undeveloped land, all of which are reduced by reported liabilities and appropriate taxes.

81


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

A rollforward of Level 3 assets is presented below. Unrealized ga ins included in earnings were $13.0 million in 2016 and $0 million in 2015 .









Guaranteed

Commingled



deposits

Real estate

funds

Other assets

Total



(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2014

$

28,929

$

17,648

$

489

$

2

$

47,068

Purchases

31,157

31,157

Sales

(282)

(282)

(Losses) gains included in earnings

(2,342)

2,485

(123)

(2)

18

Exchange rate effect

(3,456)

(3,456)

Balance at December 31, 2015

$

54,006

$

20,133

$

366

$

$

74,505

Sales

(33,084)

(33,084)

Gains included in earnings

10,867

2,124

5

12,996

Exchange rate effect

(5,457)

(5,457)

Balance at December 31, 2016

$

26,332

$

22,257

$

371

$

$

48,960



We expect to contribute approximately $0.6 million to our U.S. pension plans and $2.4 million to ou r non-U.S. pension plans in 2017 .

We estimate that future pension benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, will be as follows:











U.S. Plans

Non-U.S. Plans



(Dollars in thousands)

2017

$

23,590

$

4,256

2018

23,442

3,534

2019

23,469

4,164

2020

23,470

3,767

2021

23,529

3,734

2022-2026

116,026

21,698



Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Benefit Plans













2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Net periodic benefit cost:

Interest expense

$

944

$

970

$

1,205

Amortization of prior service credit

(105)

Mark-to-market actuarial net (gain) loss

(164)

(3,051)

499

Curtailment (gain) recognized

(930)

Total net periodic benefit cost (credit)

$

780

$

(2,081)

$

669

Weighted-average assumptions:

Discount rate

4.50

%

3.95

%

4.90

%

Current trend rate for health care costs

6.60

%

7.10

%

7.30

%

Ultimate trend rate for health care costs

4.50

%

4.50

%

4.50

%

Year that ultimate trend rate is reached

2036

2028

2028



82


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effect:











1-Percentage-

1-Percentage-



Point

Point



Increase

Decrease



(Dollars in thousands)

Effect on total of service and interest costs components

$

60

$

(52)

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation

1,262

(1,106)













2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Change in benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

$

22,030

$

25,717

Interest cost

944

970

Curtailments

Benefits paid

(1,754)

(1,606)

Actuarial (loss)

(164)

(3,051)

Benefit obligation at end of year

$

21,056

$

22,030

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

$

$

Employer contributions

1,754

1,606

Benefits paid

(1,754)

(1,606)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$

$

Amounts recognized in the balance sheet:

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

$

(2,208)

$

(2,345)

Postretirement and pension liabilities

(18,848)

(19,685)

Funded status

$

(21,056)

$

(22,030)

Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31:

Discount rate

4.20

%

4.50

%

Current trend rate for health care costs

6.50

%

6.60

%

Ultimate trend rate for health care costs

4.50

%

4.50

%

Year that ultimate rend rate is reached

2036

2036







The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 provides subsidies for certain drug costs to companies that provide coverage that is actuarially equivalent to the drug coverage under Medicare Part D. We estimate that future postretirement health care and life insurance benefit payments will be as follows:











Before Medicare

After Medicare



Subsidy

Subsidy



(Dollars in thousands)

2017

$

2,208

$

1,970

2018

2,139

1,911

2019

2,069

1,851

2020

1,987

1,779

2021

1,907

1,710

2022-2026

8,147

7,330



83


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

Other Retirement Plans

We also have defined contribution retirement plans covering certain employees. Our contributions are determined by the terms of the plans and are limited to amounts that are deductible for income taxes. Generally, benefits under these plans vest over a period of five years from date of employment. The largest plan covers salaried and most hourly employees in the U.S. In this plan, the Company contributes a percentage of eligible employee basic compensation and also a percentage of employee contributions. The expense applicable to these plans was $4.2 million , $3.4 million, and $4.9 million in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , respectively.



13. Stock-based Compensation

On May 22, 2013, our shareholders approved the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which was adopted by the Board of Directors on February 22, 2013, subject to shareholder approval. The Plan’s purpose is to promote the Company’s long-term financial interests and growth by attracting, retaining and motivating high quality key employees and directors, motivating such employees and directors to achieve the Company’s short- and long-range performance goals and objectives, thereby aligning their interests with those of its shareholders. The Plan reserves 4,400,000 shares of common stock to be issued for grants of several different types of long-term incentives including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, performance shares, other common stock based awards, and dividend equivalent rights.

The 2010 Lon g Term Incentive Plan (the “Previous Plan”) was replaced by the Plan, and no future grants have been made under the Previous Plan. However, any outstanding awards or grants made under the Previous Plan will continue until the end of their specified terms.

Stock options, performance share units, deferred stock units, and restricted share units were the only grant types outstanding at December 31, 2016 . Stock options, performance share units , and restricted share units are discussed below. Activities in other grant types were not significant.

Stock Options

General Information

Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016 , have a term of 10 years, vest evenly over three or four years on the anniversary of the grant date, and have an exercise price equal to the per share fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. Accelerated vesting is used for options held by employees who meet both the age and years of service requirements to retire prior to the end of the vesti ng period. In the case of death or retirement , the stock options become 100% vested and exercisable.

Stock Option Valuation Model and Method Information

We estimate the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We use judgment in selecting assumptions for the model, which may significantly impact the timing and amount of compensation expense, and we base our judgments primarily on historical data. When appropriate, we adjust the historical data for circumstances that are not likely to occur in the future.

84


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

The following table details the determination of the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options:





Assumption

Estimation Method

Expected life, in years

Historical stock option exercise experience

Risk-free interest rate

Yield of U.S. Treasury Bonds with remaining maturity equal to expected life of the stock option

Expected volatility

Historical daily price observations of the Company’s common stock over a period equal to the expected life of the stock option

Expected dividend yield

Historical dividend rate at the date of grant

The following table details the weighted-average grant-date fair values and the assumptions used for estimating the fair values of stock options granted in the respective years:











2016

2015

2014

Weighted-average grant-date fair value

$

4.94

$

8.45

$

9.54

Expected life, in years

6.0

6.0

6.0

Risk-free interest rate

1.4 - 1.6

%

1.9% - 2.1

%

2.0% - 2.2

%

Expected volatility

52.0 - 53.6

%

55.0% - 80.1

%

82.7% - 86.3

%

Expected dividend yield

%

%

%



Stock Option Activity Information

A summary of stock option activity follows:











Weighted-



Average



Weighted-

Remaining

Aggregate



Number of

Average

Contractual

Intrinsic



Options

Exercise Price

Term

Value



Outstanding at December 31, 2015

1,900,320

11.30

Granted

341,800

9.65

Exercised

(196,925)

5.79

Forfeited or expired

(226,345)

17.27

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

1,818,850

$

10.85

5.51

$

7,827

Exercisable at December 31, 2016

1,372,895

$

14.37

4.47

$

6,193

Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2016

1,721,357

$

10.88

5.48

$

7,409



We calculated the aggregate intrinsic value in the table above by taking the total pretax difference between our common stock’s closing market value per share on the last trading day of the year and the stock option exercise price for each grant and multiplying that result by the number of shares that would have been received by the option holders had they exercised all their in-the-money stock options.

Information related to stock options exercised follows:









2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Proceeds from the exercise of stock options

$

1,140

$

404

$

684

Intrinsic value of stock options exercised

1,496

457

1,129

Income tax benefit related to stock options exercised

524

160

395



85


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

Stock-Based Compensation Expense Information

A summary of amounts recorded and to be recorded for stock-based compensation related to stock options follows:









2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Compensation expense recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses

$

1,388

$

1,736

$

2,626

Deferred income tax benefits related to compensation expense

486

608

919

Total fair value of stock options vested

1,757

1,664

2,545

Unrecognized compensation cost

513

702

779

Expected weighted-average recognition period for unrecognized compensation, in years

2.1

2.6

2.2



Performance Share Units

General Information

Performance share units, expressed as shares of the Company’s common stock, are earned only if the Company meets specific performance targets over a three -year period. The grants have a duration of three years.

The Plan allows for payout of up to 200% of the vesting-date fair value of the awards . We pay half of the earned value in cash and half in unrestricted shar es of common stock. The portion of the grants that will be paid in cash are treated as liability awards , and therefore, we remeasure our liability and the related compensation expense at each balance sheet date, based on fair value. We treat the po rtion of the grants that will be settled with common stock as equity awards, and therefore, the amount of stock-based compensation we record over the performance period is based on the fair value on the grant date. The compensation expense and number of shares expected to vest for all performance share units are adjusted for the achievement of the performance share units’ performance conditions, based upon our best estimate using available information .

Performance Share Unit Valuation Model and Method Information

The estimated fair value of perform ance share units granted in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 is based on the closing price of the C ompany’s stock on the date of issuance and recorded based on achievement of target performance metrics.  As of December 31, 2016 , w e had 0.2 million, 0.2 million and 0.2 million performance share units outs tanding associated with our 2016 , 2015 and 2014 grants , respectively.

The weighted average grant date fair value of our performance share units was $10.07 for shares granted in 2016 , $12.32 for shares granted in 2015 and $13.09 for shares granted in 2014 . All performance share units are initially expensed at target and are evaluated each reporting period for likelihood of ach ieving the performance criteria, and the expense is adjusted, as appropriate.

86


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

Performance Share Unit Activity Information

A summary of performance share unit activity follows:









Weighted-



Average



Remaining



Number of

Contractual



Units

Term



Outstanding at December 31, 2015

889,220

Granted

291,500

Earned

(342,973)

Forfeited or expired

(183,757)

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

653,990

2.0

Expected to vest at December 31, 2016

653,990

2.0



Performance Share Expense Information

A summary of amounts recorded and to be recorded for stock-based compensation related to performance share units follows:









2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Compensation expense recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses

$

3,437

$

4,669

$

3,520

Deferred income tax benefits related to compensation expense

1,203

1,634

1,232

Unrecognized compensation cost

3,733

2,858

3,390

Expected weighted-average recognition period for unrecognized compensation, in years

2.0

1.5

2.2



Restricted Share Units

In 2016, 0.3 million and in 2015 and 2014, 0.2 million restricted share units were granted, and fair value is determined based on the closing price of the C ompany’s stock on the date of issuance . Restricted share units are expressed as equivalent shares of the Company’s common stock, and have a three- year vesting period. Total expense included in Selling general and administrative expense related to restricted share units granted in 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation cost in 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $2.4 million, $2.9 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

Directors’ Deferred Compensation

Separate from the Plan, the Company has established the Ferro Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-employee Directors, permitting its non-employee directors to voluntarily defer all or a portion of their compensation. The voluntarily deferred amounts are placed in individual accounts in a benefit trust known as a “rabbi trust” and invested in the Company’s common stock with dividends reinvested in additional shares. All disbursements from the trust are made in the Company’s common stock. The stock held in the rabbi trust is classified as treasury stock in shareholders’ equity and the deferred compensation obligation that is required to be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock, is classified as paid-in capital. The rabbi trust held 0.2 million shares, valued at $2.1 million, at December 31, 2016 , and 0.3 million shares, valued at $3.2 million, at December 31, 2015 .

87


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

14. Restructuring and Cost Reduction Programs

Our restructu ring and cost reduction program has be en developed with the objective of leveraging our global scale, realigning and lowering our cost structure and optimizing capacity utilization.  Total charges resulting from these activities were $2.7 million in 2016 , $9 . 5 million in 2015 , and $8 . 8 million in 2014 , which is reported as Restructuring and impairment charges in our consolidated statement of operations. Descriptions of the restruct uring program follow:

Global Cost Reduction Program

In 2013, we initiated a Global Cost Reduction Program that was designed to address 3 key areas of the company - (1) business realignment, (2) operational efficiency and (3) corporate and back office functions.  Business realignment was targeted at right-sizing our commercial management organizations globally.  The operational efficiency component of the program was designed to improve the efficiency of our plant operations and supply chain.  The corporate and back office initiative is principally comprised of work that we are doing with our strategic partners in the areas of finance and accounting and information technology outsourci ng .

We have summarized the charges associated w ith this restructuring program by major type of charges below:









Employee



Severance

Other Costs

Total



(Dollars in thousands)

Expected restructuring charges:

Global Cost Reduction Program

$

29,857

$

22,479

$

52,336

Total expected restructuring charges

$

29,857

$

22,479

$

52,336



Restructuring charges incurred:

Global Cost Reduction Program

$

2,744

$

6,105

$

8,849

Charges incurred in 2014

$

2,744

$

6,105

$

8,849

Global Cost Reduction Program

4,015

5,519

9,534

Charges incurred in 2015

$

4,015

$

5,519

$

9,534

Global Cost Reduction Program

1,353

1,356

2,709

Charges incurred in 2016

$

1,353

$

1,356

$

2,709

Cumulative restructuring charges incurred:

Global Cost Reduction Program

29,857

22,479

52,336

Cumulative restructuring charges incurred as of  December 31, 2016

$

29,857

$

22,479

$

52,336



We have summarized the charges associated with the restructuring programs by segments below:









Total

Cumulative



Expected

Charges To



Charges

2016

2015

2014

Date



(Dollars in thousands)

Performance Coatings

$

4,104

$

192

$

204

$

527

$

4,104

Performance Colors and Glass

19,061

205

2,300

1,279

19,061

Pigments, Powders and Oxides

2,939

630

1,970

80

2,939

Segment Total

26,104

1,027

4,474

1,886

26,104

Corporate Restructuring Charges

26,232

1,682

5,060

6,963

26,232

Total Restructuring Charges

$

52,336

$

2,709

$

9,534

$

8,849

$

52,336



88


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

We have summarized the activities and accruals related to our restructuring and cost reduction programs below:











Employee



Severance

Other Costs

Total



(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2013

$

6,183

$

4,579

$

10,762

Restructuring charges

2,744

6,105

8,849

Cash payments

(8,337)

(9,669)

(18,006)

Non-cash items

(71)

(78)

(149)

Balance at December 31, 2014

$

519

$

937

$

1,456

Restructuring charges

$

4,015

$

5,519

$

9,534

Cash payments

(3,832)

(4,341)

(8,173)

Non-cash items

(9)

(38)

(47)

Balance at December 31, 2015

$

693

$

2,077

$

2,770

Restructuring charges

$

1,353

$

1,356

$

2,709

Cash payments

(1,634)

(1,089)

(2,723)

Non-cash items

(173)

(855)

(1,028)

Balance at December 31, 2016

$

239

$

1,489

$

1,728





We expect to make cash payments to settle the remaining liability for employee severance benefits and other costs primarily over the next twelve months where applicable , except where l egal or contractual obligations would require it to expand beyond that period .



15. Leases

Rent expense for all operating leases was $9.8 million in 2016 , $9.1 million in 2015 , and $13.4 million in 2014 .

The Company has a number of capital lease arrangements primarily relating to buildings and equipment. Assets held under capital leases and included in property, plan t and equipment at December 31 follow:











2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Gross amounts capitalized

Buildings

$

3,100

$

3,100

Equipment

3,989

4,086



7,089

7,186

Accumulated amortization

Buildings

(3,100)

(3,100)

Equipment

(2,079)

(1,595)



(5,179)

(4,695)

Net assets under capital leases

$

1,910

$

2,491



89


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

At December 31, 2016 , future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable leases are as follow s :











Capital Leases

Operating Leases



(Dollars in thousands)

2017

$

961

$

8,435

2018

897

5,966

2019

753

5,193

2020

485

3,825

2021

279

2,645

Thereafter

1,533

4,398

Net minimum lease payments

$

4,908

$

30,462

Less amount representing imputed interest and executory costs

1,188

Present value of net minimum lease payments

3,720

Less current portion

714

Long-term obligations at December 31, 2016

$

3,006

16. Miscellaneous (Income ) Expense, Net

Components of Miscellaneous (income) expense, net follow:









2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

(Gain) loss on sale of assets

$

(3,891)

$

57

$

(2,470)

Argentina export tax matter

1,128

1,070

515

Other, net

103

(79)

2,577

Total Miscellaneous (income) expense, net

$

(2,660)

$

1,048

$

622



In 2016, we recorded a $3.9 mil lion gain on sale from the sale proceeds of a closed site in Australia which was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2016.

In 2013, the Supreme Court in Argentina ruled unfavorably related to certain export taxes associated with a divested operation.  As a resul t of this ruling, we recorded a $1.1 million charge in 2016 , $1.1 million charge in 2015 and $0.5 million charge in 2014 related to interest on the exposures.

90


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

17. Earnings (Loss) per Share

Details of the calculations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share follow:











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Basic earnings (loss) per share computation:

Net (loss) income attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders

$

(20,817)

$

64,100

$

86,071

Adjustment for loss (income) from discontinued operations

64,464

36,779

(94,840)

Total

$

43,647

$

100,879

$

(8,769)

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

83,298

86,718

86,920

Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders

$

0.52

$

1.16

$

(0.10)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share computation:

Net (loss) income attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders

$

(20,817)

$

64,100

$

86,071

Adjustment for loss (income) from discontinued operations

64,464

36,779

(94,840)

Total

$

43,647

$

100,879

$

(8,769)

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

83,298

86,718

86,920

Assumed exercise of stock options

549

432

Assumed satisfaction of deferred stock unit conditions

36

Assumed satisfaction of restricted stock unit conditions

544

338

Assumed satisfaction of performance stock unit conditions

483

945

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding

84,910

88,433

86,920

Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders

$

0.51

$

1.14

$

(0.10)

The number of anti-dilutive or unearned shares, was 1. 7 million, 1. 8 million, and 1. 4 million common shares for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , respectively.  These shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive impact.



18. Share Repurchase Program



The Company’s Board of Directors approved share repurchase programs, under which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock on the open market, including through a Rule 10b5-1 plan, or in privately negotiated transactions.



The timing and amount of shares to be repurchased will be determined by the Company, based on evaluation of market and business conditions, share price, and other factors.  The share repurchase programs do not obligate the Company to repurchase any dollar amount or number of common shares, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time.



The Company repurchased 1,175, 437 shares of common stock at an average price of $9. 72 per share for a total cost of $11.4 million during 2016 and had repurchased 3,282,908 shares of common stock at average price of $11.75 for a total cost of $38.6 million during 2015.  Under the share repurchase programs, the Company has repurchased an aggregate of 4,458,345 shares of common stock, at an average price of $11. 21 per share, for a total cost of $50.0 million.  As of December 31, 2016 , $50.0 million of common stock may still be repurchased under the programs.



91


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

19 . Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss )

Changes in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of income tax , were as follows:









Postretirement



Benefit Liability

Translation

Other



Adjustments

Adjustments

Adjustments

Total



(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2013

$

1,942

$

6,621

$

(70)

$

8,493

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

(29,244)

(29,244)

Reclassification to earnings:

Postretirement benefit liabilities (loss)

(1,054)

(1,054)

Net current period other comprehensive (loss)

(1,054)

(29,244)

(30,298)

Balance at December 31, 2014

888

(22,623)

(70)

(21,805)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

(39,436)

(39,436)

Reclassification to earnings:

Postretirement benefit liabilities gain

(77)

(77)

Net current period other comprehensive (loss)

(77)

(39,436)

(39,513)

Balance at December 31, 2015

811

(62,059)

(70)

(61,318)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

(46,770)

(46,770)

Reclassification to earnings:

Postretirement benefit liabilities gain

330

330

Foreign currency translation adjustment (1)

1,115

1,115

Net current period other comprehensive (loss)

330

(45,655)

(45,325)

Balance at December 31, 2016

$

1,141

$

(107,714)

$

(70)

$

(106,643)

(1) Includes a release of accumulated foreign currency translation of $1.1 million related to the Company’s sale of the Europe-based Polymer Additives business (Note 3), which is included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.





20. Reporting for Segments

As discussed in Note 3, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the Polymer Additives and the Specialty Plastics reportable segments were sold during 2014 and included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations for all years presented. The retained assets and operations of the Specialty Plastics reportable segment, which includes the manufacturing facilities in Edison, New Jersey, are reflected within our Pigments, Powders and Oxides reportable segment.  All periods presented reflect these changes to the composition of our reportable segments. The Company’s reportable segments for 2016 include Performance Coatings, Performance Colors and Glass, and Pigments, Powders and Oxides.

Net sales to external customers by segment are presented in the table below. Sales between segments were not material.











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Performance Coatings

$

526,981

$

533,370

$

588,538

Performance Colors and Glass

371,464

376,769

407,674

Pigments, Powders and Oxides

246,847

165,202

115,414

Total net sales

$

1,145,292

$

1,075,341

$

1,111,626



92


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

S egment gross profit is the metric utilized by management to evaluate segment performance . We measure segment gross profit for internal reporting purposes by excluding certain other cost of sales not directly attributab le to business units and pension and other postretirement benefits mark-to-market adjustments. Assets by segment are not regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker. Each segment’s gross profit and reconciliations to Income (loss) before income taxes are presented in the table below:











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Performance Coatings

$

139,454

$

126,945

$

131,043

Performance Colors and Glass

133,716

128,209

134,964

Pigments, Powders and Oxides

84,293

45,678

28,480

Other cost of sales

(6,246)

848

(9,402)

Total gross profit

351,217

301,680

285,085

Selling, general and administrative expenses

241,702

216,899

286,762

Restructuring and impairment charges

15,907

9,655

8,849

Other expense, net

31,163

20,343

32,310

Income (loss) before income taxes

$

62,445

$

54,783

$

(42,836)



Each segment’s capital expenditures for long-lived assets are detailed below:











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Performance Coatings

$

9,139

$

8,148

$

6,546

Performance Colors and Glass

7,123

6,620

4,216

Pigments, Powders and Oxides

4,867

2,412

453

Total segment expenditures for long-lived assets

21,129

17,180

11,215

Unallocated corporate expenditures for long-lived assets

2,896

3,142

12,127

Total expenditures for long lived assets (1)

$

24,025

$

20,322

$

23,342

_____________________

(1)

Excludes capital expenditures of discontinued operations of $0.9 million, $22.7 million and $30.5 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively.



We sell our products throughout the world and we attribute sales to countries based on the country where we generate the customer invoice. No single country other than the U.S ., Spain, and Germany rep resent greater than 10% of our net sales. Net sales by geography are as follows:











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

United States

$

300,187

$

281,976

$

263,452

Spain

188,972

174,742

211,449

Germany

111,522

114,757

125,405

Other international

544,611

503,866

511,320

Total net sales

$

1,145,292

$

1,075,341

$

1,111,626



93


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

No ne of our operations in countries other than Spain, U.S ., Colombia and Germany ow ns greater than 10% of consolidated long-lived assets. Long-lived assets that consist of property, plant, an d equipment by geography at December 31 are as follows:











2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Spain

$

51,358

$

58,657

United States

40,661

38,466

Colombia

30,700

31,595

Germany

24,916

24,890

Other international

114,391

106,821

Total long-lived assets

$

262,026

$

260,429

21. Unconsolidated Affiliates Accounted For Under the Equity Method

At December 31, 2016 , our percentage of ownership interest in these affiliates ranged from 34% to 50% . Because we exert significant influence over these affiliates, but we do not control them, our investments have been accounted for under the equity method. Investment income from these equity method investments, which is reported in Miscellaneous (income) expense, net was $0.3 million in 2016 , $0.8 million in 2015 , and $0.8 million in 2014 . The balance of our equity method investments, which is reported in Other non-current assets, was $15 . 1 million at December 31, 2016 , and $16.0 million at December 31, 2015 .

The income that we record for these investments is equal to our proportionate share of the affiliates’ income and our investments are equal to our proportionate share of the affiliates’ shareholders’ equity based on our ownership percentage. We have summarized below condensed income statement and balance sheet information for the combined equity method investees:











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Net sales

$

42,555

$

47,443

$

54,469

Gross profit

4,842

4,799

4,896

Income from continuing operations

694

1,887

254

Net income

236

1,292

133











2016

2015



(Dollars in thousands)

Current assets

$

38,246

$

40,499

Non-current assets

28,124

27,252

Current liabilities

(16,283)

(15,893)

Non-current liabilities

(16,923)

(14,678)



We had the following transactions with our equity-method investees:











2016

2015

2014



(Dollars in thousands)

Sales

$

4,589

$

6,740

$

5,255

Purchases

758

3,485

7,632

Dividends and interest received

268

332

172

Commission and royalties received

1,003

197

462

Commissions and royalties paid

26

165

34

94


Table of Contents

FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 – (Continued)

22. Quarterly Data (Unaudited )









Net Income

Earnings (Loss) Attributable to



(Loss)

Ferro Corporation Common



Attributable

Shareholders Per Common



Net Income

to Ferro

Share



Net Sales

Gross Profit

(Loss)

Corporation

Basic

Diluted



(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

2015

Quarter 1

$

262,772

$

70,635

$

9,015

$

10,970

$

0.12

$

0.13

Quarter 2

268,214

77,640

6,785

6,599

0.08

0.08

Quarter 3

279,365

77,028

(3,561)

(4,059)

(0.05)

(0.05)

Quarter 4

264,990

76,377

50,865

50,590

0.59

0.58

Total

$

1,075,341

$

301,680

$

63,104

$

64,100

$

0.74

$

0.72

2016

Quarter 1

$

277,451

$

84,229

$

(9,730)

$

(9,966)

$

(0.12)

$

(0.12)

Quarter 2

297,977

98,373

19,112

18,969

0.23

0.22

Quarter 3

288,527

88,981

(8,674)

(8,884)

(0.11)

(0.11)

Quarter 4

281,337

79,634

(20,595)

(20,936)

(0.25)

(0.25)

Total

$

1,145,292

$

351,217

$

(19,887)

$

(20,817)

$

(0.25)

$

(0.25)

Quarterly earnings per share amounts do not always add to the full-year amounts due to the averaging of shares.

Restructurin g and impairment charges in 2016 were $0.9 million in the first quarter, $0.8 million in the second quarter, $0 million in the third quarter, and $14. 2 million in the fourth quarter. Restructurin g and impairment charges in 2015 were $0.5 million in the first quarter, $1.1 million in the second quarter, $3.8 million in the third quarter, and $4.3 million in the fourth quarter. Mark-to-market net losses on our postretirement benefit plans were $ 20.1 million and $20.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively.



23. Subsequent Events



On February 14, 2017, the Company entered into a new credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders to refinance its outstanding Credit Facility and to provide liquidity for ongoing working capital requirements and general corporate purposes.  The New Credit Facility consists of a $400 million secured revolving line of credit with a term of five years, a $357.5 million secured term loan facility with a term of seven years and a 250 million euro term loan facility with a term of seven years. Refer to Note 8 for further details on the New Credit Facility.



95


Item 9 — Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A — Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Ferro is committed to maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of December 31, 2016 . The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures include components of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016 .

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Other Remediation

During the fourth quarter of 2016 , there were no changes in our internal controls or in other factors that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control system is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of its management and directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Entities that m anagement has excluded from its assessment of the Company's internal con trol over financial reporting are Pinturas Benicarló, S.L. (“Pinturas”) , which was acquired on June 1, 2016, Electro-Science Laboratories , LLC (“ESL”) , which was acquired on October 31, 2016, and Cappelle Pigments NV (together with their direct and indirect subsidiaries, “Cappelle”) , which was acquired on December 9, 2016, whose financial statements constitute 10.1 % of the Company’s total assets, 1.1% of total net sales, and 3.2 % of total net income of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 . In making this assessment, the Company used the control criteria framework of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission published in its report entitled Internal Cont rol - Integrated Framework (2013 ). Management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016 .

96


Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 , which is included below.

97


R EPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ferro Corporation

Cleveland, Ohio

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Ferro Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial rep orting at Pinturas Benicarló, S.L. (“Pinturas”), which was acquired on June 1, 2016, Electro-Science Lab oratories, LLC ( “ESL”), which was acquired on October 31, 2016 , and Cappelle Pigments NV (together with their direct and indirect subsidiaries, “Cappelle”), which was acquired on December 9, 2016 , and whose fi na ncial statements constitute 10.1 % o f the Company’s total assets, 1.1% of total net sales, and 3.2 % of total net income of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Pinturas, ESL and Cappelle. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.



98


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, of the Company and our report dated March 1, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

March 1, 2017

Item 9B — Other Information

None .

99


PART III

Item 10 — Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information on Ferro’s directors is contained under the heading “Election of Directors” of the Proxy Statem ent for Ferro Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated here by reference. The information about the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee financial expert is contained under the heading “Corporate Governance — Board Committees — Audit Committee” of the Proxy Statem ent for Ferro Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated here by reference. Information on Ferro’s executive officers is contained under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Section 16(a) filing information is contained un der the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of the Proxy Statem ent for Ferro Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated here by reference.

Ferro has adopted a series of policies dealing with business and ethics. These policies apply to all Ferro Directors, officers and employees. A summary of these policies may be found on Ferro’s Web site and the full text of the policies is available in print, free of charge, by writing to: General Counsel, Ferro Corporation, 6060 Parkland Blvd. Suite 250, Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124, USA. Exceptions, waivers and amendments of those policies may be made, if at all, only by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and, in the event any such exceptions, waivers or amendments are granted, a description of the change or event will be posted on Ferro’s Web site ( www.ferro.com ) within four business days. Ferro maintains a worldwide hotline that allows employees throughout the world to report confidentially any detected violations of these legal and ethical conduct policies consistent with local legal requirements and subject to local legal limitations.

Item 11 — Executive Compensation

The information on executive compensation is contained under the headings “Executive Compensation Discussion & Analysis” and “2016 Executive Compensation” of the Proxy Statem ent for Ferro Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated here by reference.

Item 12 — Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information on security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is contained under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management — Stock Ownership by Other Major Shareholders” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Stock Ownership by Director and Executive Officers ” of the Proxy Statement for Ferro Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated here by reference.

100


The numbers of shares issued and available for issuance under Ferro’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016 , were as follows:











Weighted-Average

Number of Shares



Number of Shares to Be

Exercise Price of

Remaining Available for



Issued on Exercise of

Outstanding

Future Issuance Under



Outstanding Options,

Options, and

Equity Compensation

Equity Compensation Plan

and Other Awards

Other Awards

Plans (1)

Approved by Ferro Shareholders

3,353,750

(2)

$

5.88

2,610,048

(3)

Not Approved by Ferro Shareholders

164,118

Total

3,517,868

$

5.88

(4)

2,610,048



_____________________

(1)

Excludes shares listed under “Number of Shares to Be Issued on Exercise of Outstanding Options and Other Awards .

(2)

Includes options and other awards issued under the Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan and prior equity compensation plans.

(3)

Shares are only available under the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan and may be issued as stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares or units, performance shares or units, and other common stock-based awards.

(4)

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options and other awards; excludes phantom units.

A description follows of the material features of each plan that was not approved by Ferro shareholders:

·

Executive Employee Deferred Compensation Plan. The Executive Employee Deferred Compensation Plan allows participants to defer up to 75% of annual base salary and up to 100% of incentive cash bonus awards and cash performance share payouts. Participants may elect to have all or a portion of their deferred compensation accounts deemed to be invested in shares of Ferro Common Stock and credited with hypothetical appreciation, depreciation, and dividends. When distributions are made from this Plan in respect of such shares, the distributions are made in actual shares of Ferro Common Stock.

·

Supplemental Executive Defined Contribution Plan. The Supplemental Executive Defined Contribution Plan allows participants to be credited annually with matching and basic pension contributions that they would have received under the Company’s 401(k) plan except for the applicable IRS limitations on compensation and contributions. Contributions vest at 20% for each year of service, are deemed invested in Ferro Common Stock and earn dividends. Distributions are made in Ferro Common Stock or in cash.

Item 13 — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

There are no relationships or transactions that are required to be reported. The information about director independence is contained under the heading “Corporate Governance — Director Independence” of the Proxy Statement for Ferro Corporation’s 20 17 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated here by reference.

Item 14 — Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information co ntained under the heading “Accounting Firm Information — Fees” of the Proxy Statement for Ferro Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated here by reference.

101


PART IV

Item 15 — Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(a)

The consolidated financial statements of Ferro Corporation and subsidiaries contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

·

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ;

·

Consolidated Statements o f Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ;

·

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015 ;

·

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ;

·

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ; and

·

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(b)

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , contained on page 105 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All other schedules have been omitted because the material is not applicable or is not required as permitted by the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements.

(c)

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index beginning on page 106 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

102


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.







FERRO CORPORATION





By

/s/  Peter T. Thomas



Peter T. Thomas



Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: March 1 , 201 7

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in their i ndicated capacities as of the 1st day of March , 2017 .





/s/  Peter T. Thomas

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Peter T. Thomas

(Principal Executive Officer)



/s/  Benjamin J. Schlater

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Benjamin J. Schlater

(Pr incipal Financial Officer)



/s/ James A. Barna

Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

James A. Barna

(Principal Accounting Officer)



/s/  Richard J. Hipple

Director

Richard J. Hipple



/s/  Gregory E. Hyland

Director

Gregory E. Hyland



/s/  David A. Lorber

Director

David A. Lorber



/s/  Timothy K. Pistell

Director

Timothy K. Pistell



/s/ Andrew M. Ross

Director

Andrew M. Ross



/s/ Allen A. Spizzo

Director

Allen A. Spizzo



/s/  Ronald P. Vargo

Director

Ronald P. Vargo



103


FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES

Yea rs Ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014









Additions Charged



Balance at

(Reductions Credited) to

Adjustment for



Beginning of

Costs and

Differences in

Balance at



Period

Expenses

Deductions

Exchange Rates

End of Period



(Dollars in thousands)

Allowance for Possible Losses on Collection of Accounts Receivable:

Year ended December 31, 2016

$

7,784

1,383

(820)

(181)

$

8,166

Year ended December 31, 2015

$

10,325

667

(1,802)

(1,406)

$

7,784

Year ended December 31, 2014

$

12,093

2,657

(3,442)

(983)

$

10,325

Valuation Allowance on Net Deferred Tax Assets:

Year ended December 31, 2016

$

55,043

(16,686)

1

(1,003)

$

37,354

Year ended December 31, 2015

$

147,887

(86,597)

1

(6,247)

$

55,043

Year ended December 31, 2014

$

193,984

(37,801)

(8,296)

$

147,887

(1) Included within this deduction is $6 . 8 million and $63.3 million for the year s ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, of valuation allowance release, resulting from the conclusion that the underlying deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized.



104


EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are filed with this report or are incorporated here by reference to a prior filing in accordance with Rule 12b-32 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

Exhibit:





2

Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement or successor:

2.1

Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated April 29, 2015, by and among Ferro Corporation, the sellers party thereto, Corporación Química Vhem, S.L. and Dibon USA, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 9, 2015).

2.2

Addendum to Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated July 7, 2015, by and among Ferro Corporation, Ferro Spain Management Company, S.L.U., the sellers party thereto, Corporación Química Vhem, S.L. and Dibon USA, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 9, 2015).

3

Articles of Incorporation and by-laws:

3.1

Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ferro Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 5, 2008).

3.2

Certificate of Amendment to the Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ferro Corporation filed December 29, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 5, 2008).

3.3

Certificate of Amendment to the Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ferro Corporation filed June 23, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 5, 2008).

3.4

Certificate of Amendment to the Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ferro Corporation filed October 14, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 17, 2011).

3.5

Certificate of Amendment to the Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ferro Corporation filed on April 25, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014).

3.6

Ferro Corporation Amended and Restated Code of Regulations ; Amended and Restated as of December 8, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Curr ent Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2015 ).

4

Instruments defining rights of security holders, including indentures:

4.1

Senior Indenture, dated as of March 5, 2008, by and between Ferro Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 5, 2008).

4.2

First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 19, 2008, by and between Ferro Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association (with Form of 6.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 19, 2008).

4.3

Form of Indenture, by and between Ferro Corporation and Wilmington Trust FSB (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR, filed July 27, 2010).

4.4

First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 24, 2010, by and between Ferro Corporation and Wilmington Trust FSB (with Form of 7.875% Senior Notes due 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 24, 2010).

4.5

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated July 31, 2014, by and between Ferro Corporation and Wilmington Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 5, 2014).

The Company agrees, upon request, to furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any instrument authorizing long-term debt that does not authorize debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

10

Material Contracts:

10.1

Credit Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2014, among Ferro Corporation, the lenders party thereto, PNC Bank, National Association, as the administrative agent, collateral agent and a letter of credit issuer, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., as the syndication agent and as a letter of credit issuer, and the various financial institutions and other persons from time to time party hereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 5, 2014).

105


10.2

Incremental Assumption Agreement, dated January 25, 2016, by and among Ferro Corporation , PNC Bank, National Association, as the administrative agent, the collateral agent and as an issuer, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as an issuer, and various financial institutions as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 26, 2016).

10.3

Second Incremental Assumption Agreement, dated August 29, 2016, by and among Ferro Corporation, PNC Bank, National Association, as the administrative agent, the collateral agent and as an issuer, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as an issuer, and various financial institutions as lenders. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ferro Corporation’s current Report on Form 8K, filed August 30, 2016).

10.4

Retention Agreement, dated September 1, 2016, by and between Jeffrey L. Rutherford and Ferro Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016).*

10.5

Third Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 28, 2013, by and among Ferro Corporation, certain of Ferro Corporation’s subsidiaries, PNC Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent and the Collateral Agent, and various financial institutions as Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 28, 2013).

10.6

Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 15, 2012, by and among Ferro Corporation, certain of Ferro Corporation’s subsidiaries, PNC Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent and the collateral Agent, and various financial institutions as Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 19, 2012).

10.7

First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement and Amended and Restated Subsidiary Guaranty (Domestic) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).

10.8

Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated August 24, 2010, by and among Ferro Corporation, PNC Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent, the Collateral Agent and the Issuer, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A., as the Syndication Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 24, 2010).

10.9

First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 26, 2010, by and among Ferro Corporation, the several banks and other financial institutions or entities listed on the signature pages hereto as Lenders, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as Original Term Loan Administrative Agent, and PNC Bank, National Association, as New Term Loan Administrative Agent and as Revolving Loan Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 27, 2010).

10.10

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated October 26, 2009, among Ferro Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries; various financial institutions; Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch; PNC Bank, National Association; National City Bank; KeyBank National Association; and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 27, 2009).

10. 11

Amendment and Restatement and Resignation and Appointment Agreement, dated October 26, 2009, among Ferro Corporation; the several banks and other financial institutions or entities listed on the signature pages thereto; Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch,; National City Bank; and PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 27, 2009).

10. 12

Second Amendment to Purchase and Contribution Agreement by and between Ferro Corporation and Ferro Finance Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 29, 2013).

10.1 3

First Amendment to Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2011, between Ferro Corporation and Ferro Finance Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 3, 2011).

10.1 4

Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated June 2, 2009, between Ferro Corporation and Ferro Finance Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 3, 2009).

10.1 5

Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2013, by and among PNC Bank, National Association, Ferro Finance Corporation and Market Street Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.

10.16

Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2013, among Ferro Finance Corporation, Ferro Corporation, Market Street Funding LLC and PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 30, 2013).

106


10.17

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement among Ferro Finance Corporation, Ferro Corporation, Market Street Funding LLC and PNC Bank, National Association, as Agent and LC Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 29, 2013).

10.18

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2012, among Ferro Finance Corporation, Ferro Corporation, Market Street Funding, LLC, and PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 31, 2012).

10.19

Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2011, among Ferro Finance Corporation, Ferro Corporation, Market Street Funding, LLC, and PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 3, 2011).

10.20

Ferro Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).*

10.21

Ferro Corporation 2003 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).*

10.22

Form of Terms of Incentive Stock Option Award Grants under the Ferro Corporation 2003 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).*

10.23

Form of Terms of Performance Share Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2003 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).*

10.24

Ferro Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).*

10 .25

Form of Terms of Performance Share Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2003 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).*

10.2 6

Form of Terms of Nonstatutory Stock Option Grants under the Ferro Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).*

10.27

Form of Terms of Performance Share Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).*

10.28

Form of Terms of Restricted Share Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).*

10. 29

Form of Terms of Deferred Stock Unit Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014).*

10.30

Form of Terms of Deferred Stock Unit Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).*

10.31

Ferro Corporation 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 6, 2010).*

10.32

Form of Terms of Nonstatutory Stock Option Grants under the Ferro Corporation 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).*

10.33

Form of Terms of Performance Share Unit Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).*

10.34

Form of Terms of Restricted Share Unit Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).*

10.35

Ferro Corporation 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 23, 2013).*

10.36

Form of Terms of Nonstatutory Stock Options Grants under the Ferro Corporation 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

107


10.37

Form of Terms of Performance Share Unit Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.38

Form of Terms of Restricted Share Unit Awards under the Ferro Corporation 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.39

Terms of Retention Restricted Stock Units Award for Mr. Peter T. Thomas (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 30, 2014).*

10.40

Amendment to the Ferro Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Executive Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).*

10.41

Ferro Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Executive Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).*

10.42

Ferro Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).*

10.43

Ferro Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).*

10.44

Ferro Corporation Supplemental Defined Benefit Plan for Executive Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.*

10.45

Amendment to the Ferro Corporation Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan for Executive Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).*

10.46

Ferro Corporation Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan for Executive Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Ferro Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).*

10.47

Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 26, 2013).*

10.48

Change in Control Agreement, dated March 22, 2013, between Peter T. Thomas and Ferro Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Ferro Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2013).*

10.49

Form of Change in Control Agreement, dated May 2, 2012, between Jeffrey R. Rutherford and Ferro Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2010).*

10.50

Form of Change in Control Agreement, dated January 1, 2009 (Mark H. Duesenberg, and Ann E. Killian have entered into this form of change in control agreement) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 7, 2009).*

10.51

Ferro Corporation Executive Separation Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 28, 2010).*

10.5 5

Letter Agreement, dated November 12, 2012, between Peter T. Thomas and Ferro Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to Ferro Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).*

10.5 6

Letter Agreement, dated November 12, 2012, between Jeffry L. Rutherford and Ferro Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Ferro Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).*

12

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.

21

List of Subsidiaries.

23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350.

32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350.

101

XBRL Documents:

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.**

________________

* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which one or more Directors and/or executives of Ferro Corporation may be participants.

108


** In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 t o this Annual Report on Form 10- K shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.



109


TABLE OF CONTENTS