FRAF 10-Q Quarterly Report June 30, 2014 | Alphaminr
FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP /PA/

FRAF 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2014

FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP /PA/
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 fraf-20140630x10q.htm 10-Q c0cf48953aa4408

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from__________ to___________

Commission file number 0-12126

FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

PENNSYLVANIA

25-1440803

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

20 South Main Street, Chambersburg

PA17201-0819

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(717) 264-6116

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.   See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)  Yes No

There were 4,193,398 outstanding shares of the Registrant’s common stock as of July 3 1 , 2014 .


INDEX

Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1

Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 3 0 , 2014 and December 31, 2013 (unaudited)

1

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months ended June 3 0 , 2014

2

and 2013 (unaudited)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months ended

3

June 3 0 , 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Six Months

3

ended June 3 0 , 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months ended June 3 0 , 2014

4

and 2013 (unaudited)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

5

Item 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition

27

Item 3

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

51

Item 4

Controls and Procedures

51

Part II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1

Legal Proceedings

52

Item 1A

Risk Factors

52

Item 2

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

52

Item 3

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

52

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

52

Item 5

Other Information

52

Item 6

Exhibits

52

SIGNATURE PAGE

53

EXHIBITS


Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 Financial Statements

C

onsolidated Balance Sheet s

(unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30

December 31

2014

2013

Assets

Cash and due from banks

$

17,515

$

13,542

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

37,276

27,203

Total cash and cash equivalents

54,791

40,745

Investment securities available for sale, at fair value

175,419

159,674

Restricted stock

1,938

1,906

Loans held for sale

600

349

Loans

732,719

723,413

Allowance for loan losses

(9,519)

(9,702)

Net Loans

723,200

713,711

Premises and equipment, net

15,762

16,145

Bank owned life insurance

21,816

21,530

Goodwill

9,016

9,016

Other intangible assets

491

698

Other real estate owned

4,112

4,708

Deferred tax asset, net

4,717

5,445

Other assets

10,689

10,660

Total assets

$

1,022,551

$

984,587

Liabilities

Deposits

Noninterest-bearing checking

$

129,270

$

121,565

Money management, savings and interest checking

665,627

610,245

Time

105,807

113,914

Total Deposits

900,704

845,724

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

2,264

23,834

Long-term debt

12,000

12,403

Other liabilities

7,624

7,238

Total liabilities

922,592

889,199

Shareholders' equity

Common stock, $1 par value per share,15,000,000 shares authorized with

4,581,342 shares issued and 4,192,791 shares outstanding at June 30, 2014 and

4,560,700 shares issued and 4,168,673 shares outstanding at December 31, 2013

4,581

4,561

Capital stock without par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized with no

shares issued and outstanding

-

-

Additional paid-in capital

36,980

36,636

Retained earnings

68,623

65,897

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(3,277)

(4,696)

Treasury stock, 388,551 shares at June 30, 2014 and 392,027 shares at

December 31, 2013, at cost

(6,948)

(7,010)

Total shareholders' equity

99,959

95,388

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$

1,022,551

$

984,587

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1


Consolidated Statements of Income

For the Three Months Ended

For the Six Months Ended

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) (unaudited)

June 30

June 30

2014

2013

2014

2013

Interest income

Loans, including fees

$

7,648

$

8,035

$

15,159

$

16,332

Interest and dividends on investments:

Taxable interest

661

365

1,302

718

Tax exempt interest

376

381

734

757

Dividend income

31

22

56

40

Deposits and obligations of other banks

45

73

84

131

Total interest income

8,761

8,876

17,335

17,978

Interest expense

Deposits

694

1,162

1,396

2,265

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

2

12

9

30

Long-term debt

121

122

242

243

Total interest expense

817

1,296

1,647

2,538

Net interest income

7,944

7,580

15,688

15,440

Provision for loan losses

266

803

464

1,605

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

7,678

6,777

15,224

13,835

Noninterest income

Investment and trust services fees

1,101

1,130

2,192

2,148

Loan service charges

250

192

418

442

Mortgage banking activities

19

40

32

18

Deposit service charges and fees

525

452

990

888

Other service charges and fees

317

233

584

455

Debit card income

337

316

643

602

Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance

144

153

286

305

Other real estate owned (losses) gains, net

(62)

(141)

(185)

(141)

Other

10

47

62

89

OTTI losses recognized in earnings

-

(50)

-

(50)

Securities gains, net

221

29

221

29

Total noninterest income

2,862

2,401

5,243

4,785

Noninterest expense

Salaries and employee benefits

4,107

4,018

8,357

8,232

Net occupancy expense

586

568

1,262

1,136

Furniture and equipment expense

237

244

491

491

Advertising

270

317

586

652

Legal and professional fees

353

359

618

639

Data processing

493

451

884

845

Pennsylvania bank shares tax

173

204

347

409

Intangible amortization

104

106

207

213

FDIC insurance

222

270

454

515

ATM/debit card processing

178

165

357

346

Other

892

923

1,741

1,730

Total noninterest expense

7,615

7,625

15,304

15,208

Income before federal income taxes

2,925

1,553

5,163

3,412

Federal income tax expense

606

198

1,018

506

Net income

$

2,319

$

1,355

$

4,145

$

2,906

Per share

Basic earnings per share

$

0.55

$

0.33

$

0.99

$

0.71

Diluted earnings per share

$

0.55

$

0.33

$

0.99

$

0.70

Cash dividends declared

$

0.17

$

0.17

$

0.34

$

0.34

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2


C onsolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Three Months Ended

For the Six Months Ended

June 30

June 30

(Dollars in thousands) (unaudited)

2014

2013

2014

2013

Net Income

$

2,319

$

1,355

$

4,145

$

2,906

Securities:

Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period

774

(1,768)

2,194

(1,591)

Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income

(221)

21

(221)

21

Net unrealized (losses) gains

553

(1,747)

1,973

(1,570)

Tax effect

(188)

594

(671)

534

Net of tax amount

365

(1,153)

1,302

(1,036)

Derivatives:

Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period

(4)

42

(12)

44

Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (1)

94

152

189

332

Net unrealized gains

90

194

177

376

Tax effect

(30)

(66)

(60)

(128)

Net of tax amount

60

128

117

248

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

425

(1,025)

1,419

(788)

Total Comprehensive Income

$

2,744

$

330

$

5,564

$

2,118

Reclassification adjustment / Statement line item

Tax  expense (benefit)

Tax  expense (benefit)

(1) Derivatives / interest expense on deposits

$

(32)

$

(52)

$

(64)

$

(113)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

For the S ix months June 3 0 , 201 4 and 20 1 3 :

Accumulated

Additional

Other

Common

Paid-in

Retained

Comprehensive

Treasury

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) (unaudited)

Stock

Capital

Earnings

Loss

Stock

Total

Balance at December 31, 2012

$

4,503

$

35,788

$

62,475

$

(4,050)

$

(7,082)

$

91,634

Net income

-

-

2,906

-

-

2,906

Other comprehensive loss

-

-

-

(788)

-

(788)

Cash dividends declared, $.34 per share

-

-

(1,399)

-

-

(1,399)

Treasury shares issued under stock option plans, 3,701 shares

-

(20)

-

-

67

47

Common stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan, 22,920 shares

23

338

-

-

-

361

Balance at June 30, 2013

$

4,526

$

36,106

$

63,982

$

(4,838)

$

(7,015)

$

92,761

Balance at December 31, 2013

$

4,561

$

36,636

$

65,897

$

(4,696)

$

(7,010)

$

95,388

Net income

-

-

4,145

-

-

4,145

Other comprehensive income

-

-

-

1,419

-

1,419

Cash dividends declared, $.34 per share

-

-

(1,419)

-

-

(1,419)

Treasury shares issued under stock option plans, 3,476 shares

-

(10)

-

-

62

52

Common stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan, 20,642 shares

20

354

-

-

-

374

Balance at June 30, 2014

$

4,581

$

36,980

$

68,623

$

(3,277)

$

(6,948)

$

99,959

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30

2014

2013

(Dollars in thousands) (unaudited)

Cash flows from operating activities

Net income

$

4,145

$

2,906

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

732

754

Net amortization of loans and investment securities

893

910

Amortization and net change in mortgage servicing rights valuation

8

33

Amortization of intangibles

207

213

Provision for loan losses

464

1,605

Net realized gains on sales of securities

(221)

(29)

Impairment writedown on securities recognized in earnings

-

50

Loans originated for sale

(3,554)

(5,270)

Proceeds from sale of loans

3,303

5,099

Writedown of other real estate owned

200

135

Net (gain) loss on sale or disposal of other real estate/other repossessed assets

(15)

6

Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance

(286)

(305)

(Increase) decrease in other assets

(118)

1,077

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

526

(265)

Other, net

87

705

Net cash provided by operating activities

6,371

7,624

Cash flows from investing activities

Proceeds from sales and calls of investment securities available for sale

1,582

5,147

Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of securities available for sale

12,313

18,376

Purchase of investment securities available for sale

(28,362)

(42,743)

Net (increase) decrease in restricted stock

(32)

1,436

Net (increase) decrease in loans

(10,012)

23,614

Capital expenditures

(321)

(275)

Proceeds from sale of other real estate/other repossessed assets

493

15

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

(24,339)

5,570

Cash flows from financing activities

Net increase in demand deposits, NOW, and savings accounts

63,087

50,532

Net decrease in time deposits

(8,107)

(43,175)

Net decrease in repurchase agreements

(21,570)

(3,275)

Long-term debt payments

(403)

(4)

Dividends paid

(1,419)

(1,399)

Treasury stock issued under stock option plans

52

47

Common stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan

374

361

Net cash provided by financing activities

32,014

3,087

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

14,046

16,281

Cash and cash equivalents as of January 1

40,745

77,834

Cash and cash equivalents as of June 30

$

54,791

$

94,115

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

Cash paid during the year for:

Interest on deposits and other borrowed funds

$

1,670

$

2,607

Income taxes

$

236

$

300

Noncash Activities

Loans transferred to Other Real Estate

$

82

$

293

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4


FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Franklin Financial Services Corporation (the Corporation), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Farmers and Merchants Trust Company of Chambersburg (the Bank) and Franklin Future Fund Inc.  Farmers and Merchants Trust Company of Chambersburg is a commercial bank that has one wholly-owned subsidiary, Franklin Financial Properties Corp. Franklin Financial Property Corp. holds real estate assets that are leased by the Bank. Franklin Future Fund Inc. is a non-bank investment company. The activities of non-bank entities are not significant to the consolidated totals.  All significant intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of June 3 0 , 201 4 , and for all other periods presented have been made.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted.  It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Corporation’s 201 3 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The consolidated results of operations for the period ended June 3 0 , 201 4 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.  Management has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 201 3 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements.

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold.  Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one-day periods.

Earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period end.  A reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used to calculate basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share follows:

For the Three Months Ended

For the Six Months Ended

June 30

June 30

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

2014

2013

2014

2013

Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)

4,184

4,126

4,178

4,119

Impact of common stock equivalents

7

7

6

7

Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted)

4,191

4,133

4,184

4,126

Anti-dilutive options excluded from calculation

34

46

37

57

Net income

$

2,319

$

1,355

$

4,145

$

2,906

Basic earnings per share

$

0.55

$

0.33

$

0.99

$

0.71

Diluted earnings per share

$

0.55

$

0.33

$

0.99

$

0.70

Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Receivables (Topic 310): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans Upon Foreclosure. ASU 2014-04 “ Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans Upon Foreclosure” clarifies that a creditor is considered to have physical possession of residential real estate that is collateral for a residential mortgage loan when it obtains legal title to the collateral or a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement is completed.  Consequently, it should reclassify the loan to other real estate owned at that time.  ASU 2014-04 applies to all creditors who obtain physical possession resulting from an in substance repossession or foreclosure of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan in satisfaction of a receivable.  The ASU does not apply to commercial real estate loans, as the foreclosure process and applicable laws for those assets are significantly different from residential real estate.  The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014.  The Corporation does not believe ASU 2014-04 will have a material effect on its financial statements.

Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists .  ASU 2013-11 “ Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit

5


When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists,” require an entity with an unrecognized tax benefit that is ‘not available’ or not intended to be used at the reporting date to present the unrecognized tax benefit as a liability that should not be combined with deferred tax assets.  Otherwise, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented as a reduction to the related deferred tax asset.  The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date.  The amendments in ASU 2013-11 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  The Corporation adopted this ASU 2013-11 at March 31, 2014.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments in this Update (ASU 2014-09) establish a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries under U.S. GAAP, including those that previously followed industry-specific guidance such as the real estate, construction and software industries. The revenue standard’s core principle is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. To accomplish this objective, the standard requires five basic steps: i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The ASU is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. Three basic transition methods are available – full retrospective, retrospective with certain practical expedients, and a cumulative effect approach. Under the third alternative, an entity would apply the new revenue standard only to contracts that are incomplete under legacy U.S. GAAP at the date of initial application (e.g. January 1, 2017) and recognize the cumulative effect of the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. That is, prior years would not be restated and additional disclosures would be required to enable users of the financial statements to understand the impact of adopting the new standard in the current year compared to prior years that are presented under legacy U.S. GAAP. Early adoption is prohibited under U.S. GAAP. The Corporation does not believe ASU 2014-09 will have a material effect on its financial statements.

Note 3. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in shareholders' equity are as follows:

June 30

December 31

2014

2013

(Dollars in thousands)

Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities

$

1,232

$

(741)

Tax effect

(419)

252

Net of tax amount

813

(489)

Net unrealized losses on derivatives

(384)

(561)

Tax effect

131

191

Net of tax amount

(253)

(370)

Accumulated pension adjustment

(5,814)

(5,814)

Tax effect

1,977

1,977

Net of tax amount

(3,837)

(3,837)

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

$

(3,277)

$

(4,696)

Note 4. Guarantees

The Corporation does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit.  Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  Generally, all letters of credit, when issued, have expiration dates within one year.  The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank generally holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments .  The Bank had $ 2 2 . 5 million and $ 2 0 .2 million of standby letters of credit as of June 3 0 , 201 4 and

6


December 31, 201 3 , respectively. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees.  The amount of the liability as of June 3 0 , 201 4 and December 31, 201 3 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued was not material.

Note 5 . Investments

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available for sale as of June 3 0 , 2014 and December 31, 2013 is as follows :

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross

Gross

Amortized

unrealized

unrealized

Fair

June 30, 2014

cost

gains

losses

value

Equity securities

$

110

$

284

$

-

$

394

U.S. Government agency securities

15,376

99

(80)

15,395

Municipal securities

64,018

1,762

(730)

65,050

Corporate debt securities

1,000

-

-

1,000

Trust preferred securities

5,931

-

(625)

5,306

Agency mortgage-backed securities

85,859

905

(412)

86,352

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

1,845

45

(14)

1,876

Asset-backed securities

48

-

(2)

46

$

174,187

$

3,095

$

(1,863)

$

175,419

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross

Gross

Amortized

unrealized

unrealized

Fair

December 31, 2013

cost

gains

losses

value

Equity securities

$

1,472

$

499

$

(1)

$

1,970

U.S. Government agency securities

11,771

94

(114)

11,751

Municipal securities

56,861

1,400

(1,404)

56,857

Corporate debt securities

1,002

-

(1)

1,001

Trust preferred securities

5,922

-

(871)

5,051

Agency mortgage-backed securities

81,352

726

(1,051)

81,027

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

1,984

16

(31)

1,969

Asset-backed securities

51

-

(3)

48

$

160,415

$

2,735

$

(3,476)

$

159,674

At June 3 0 , 2014 and December 31, 2013, the fair value of investment securities pledged to secure public funds, trust balances, repurchase agreements, deposit and other obligations totaled $ 83.9 million and $ 107.6 million, respectively.

7


The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at June 30 , 2014, by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because of prepayment or call options embedded in the securities.

(Dollars in thousands)

Amortized cost

Fair value

Due in one year or less

$

2,741

$

2,780

Due after one year through five years

11,474

11,911

Due after five years through ten years

27,749

28,064

Due after ten years

44,409

44,042

86,373

86,797

Mortgage-backed securities

87,704

88,228

$

174,077

$

175,025

The following table provides additional detail about trust preferred securities as of June 3 0 , 201 4 :

Trust Preferred Securities

(Dollars in thousands)

Deal Name

Single Issuer or Pooled

Class

Amortized Cost

Fair Value

Gross Unrealized Gain (Loss)

Lowest Credit Rating Assigned

Number of Banks Currently Performing

Deferrals and Defaults as % of Original Collateral

Expected Deferral/ Defaults as a Percentage of Remaining Performing Collateral

Huntington Cap Trust

Single

Preferred Stock

$

937

$

844

$

(93)

BB+

1

None

None

Huntington Cap Trust II

Single

Preferred Stock

887

821

(66)

BB+

1

None

None

BankAmerica Cap III

Single

Preferred Stock

962

836

(126)

BB+

1

None

None

Wachovia Cap Trust II

Single

Preferred Stock

276

257

(19)

BBB+

1

None

None

Corestates Captl Tr II

Single

Preferred Stock

934

871

(63)

BBB+

1

None

None

Chase Cap VI JPM

Single

Preferred Stock

961

865

(96)

BBB

1

None

None

Fleet Cap Tr V

Single

Preferred Stock

974

812

(162)

BB+

1

None

None

$

5,931

$

5,306

$

(625)

The following table provides additional detail about private label mortgage-backed securities as of June 3 0 , 201 4 :

Private Label Mortgage Backed Securities

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross

Cumulative

Origination

Amortized

Fair

Unrealized

Collateral

Lowest Credit

Credit

OTTI

Description

Date

Cost

Value

Gain (Loss)

Type

Rating Assigned

Support %

Charges

RALI 2004-QS4 A7

3/1/2004

$

129

$

134

$

5

ALT A

BBB+

12.53

$

-

MALT 2004-6 7A1

6/1/2004

424

444

20

ALT A

CCC

14.38

-

RALI 2005-QS2 A1

2/1/2005

308

321

13

ALT A

CC

5.78

10

RALI 2006-QS4 A2

4/1/2006

575

567

(8)

ALT A

D

-

293

GSR 2006-5F 2A1

5/1/2006

91

98

7

Prime

D

-

15

RALI 2006-QS8 A1

7/28/2006

318

312

(6)

ALT A

D

-

197

$

1,845

$

1,876

$

31

$

515

8


Impairment :

The investment portfolio contained 99 securities with $75.8 million of temporarily impaired fair value and $1.9 million in unrealized losses at June 30, 2014. The total unrealized loss position has improved by $1.6 million since year-end 2013.

For securities with an unrealized loss, Management applies a systematic methodology in order to perform an assessment of the potential for other-than-temporary impairment.  In the case of debt securities, investments considered for other-than-temporary impairment: (1) had a specified maturity or repricing date; (2) were generally expected to be redeemed at par, and (3) were expected to achieve a recovery in market value within a reasonable period of time. In addition, the Bank considers whether it intends to sell these securities or whether it will be forced to sell these securities before the earlier of amortized cost recovery or maturity. Equity securities are assessed for other-than-temporary impairment based on the length of time of impairment, dollar amount of the impairment and general market and financial conditions relating to specific issues.  The impairment identified on debt and equity securities and subject to assessment at June 30, 2014, was deemed to be temporary and required no further adjustments to the financial statements, unless otherwise noted.

The following table reflects temporary impairment in the investment portfolio (excluding restricted stock), aggregated by investment category, length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position and the number of securities in each category as of June 3 0 , 2014 and December 31, 2013:

June 30, 2014

Less than 12 months

12 months or more

Total

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

(Dollars in thousands)

Value

Losses

Count

Value

Losses

Count

Value

Losses

Count

U.S. Government agency securities

$

2,078

$

(2)

3

$

7,509

$

(78)

13

$

9,587

$

(80)

16

Municipal securities

10,051

(111)

14

15,070

(619)

21

25,121

(730)

35

Trust preferred securities

-

-

-

5,306

(625)

7

5,306

(625)

7

Agency mortgage-backed securities

20,400

(126)

21

14,472

(286)

17

34,872

(412)

38

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

-

-

-

879

(14)

2

879

(14)

2

Asset-backed securities

-

-

-

5

(2)

1

5

(2)

1

Total temporarily impaired securities

$

32,529

$

(239)

38

$

43,241

$

(1,624)

61

$

75,770

$

(1,863)

99

December 31, 2013

Less than 12 months

12 months or more

Total

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

(Dollars in thousands)

Value

Losses

Count

Value

Losses

Count

Value

Losses

Count

Equity securities

$

22

$

(1)

1

$

-

$

-

-

$

22

$

(1)

1

U.S. Government agency securities

3,971

(85)

7

3,807

(29)

7

7,778

(114)

14

Municipal securities

16,770

(1,022)

24

3,160

(382)

4

19,930

(1,404)

28

Corporate debt securities

-

-

-

1,001

(1)

1

1,001

(1)

1

Trust preferred securities

-

-

-

5,051

(871)

7

5,051

(871)

7

Agency mortgage-backed securities

40,395

(999)

38

2,213

(52)

4

42,608

(1,051)

42

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

-

-

-

911

(31)

2

911

(31)

2

Asset-backed securities

-

-

-

48

(3)

3

48

(3)

3

Total temporarily impaired securities

$

61,158

$

(2,107)

70

$

16,191

$

(1,369)

28

$

77,349

$

(3,476)

98

The municipal bond portfolio has the largest unrealized loss at $730 thousand, but this is $674 thousand less than at the prior-year end.  The unrealized loss in this portfolio is deemed to be non-credit related and no other-than-temporary impairment charges have been recorded.

The trust preferred portfolio contains seven securities with a fair value of $5.3 million and an unrealized loss of $62 5 thousand. The trust-preferred securities held by the Bank are single entity issues, not pooled trust preferred securities.  Therefore, the impairment review of these securities is based only on the issuer and the security cannot be impaired by the performance of other issuers as if it was a pooled trust-preferred bond. All of the Bank’s trust preferred securities are

9


single issue, variable rate notes with long maturities ( 2027 2028 ).  None of these bonds have suspended or missed a dividend payment. At June 30, 2014, the Bank believes it will be able to collect all interest and principal due on these bonds and no other-than-temporary-impairment charges were recorded.

The PLMBS sector shows a gross unrealized loss of $14 thousand. These bonds were all rated AAA at time of purchase, but have since experienced rating declines. Some have experienced increased delinquencies and defaults, while others have seen the credit support increase as the bonds paid-down. The Bank monitors the performance of the PLMBS investments on a regular basis and reviews delinquencies, default rates, credit support levels and various cash flow stress test scenarios. In determining the credit related loss, Management considers all principal past due 60 days or more as a loss. If additional principal moves beyond 60 days past due, it will also be considered a loss. As a result of the analysis on PLMBS it was determined that no impairment charge was required at quarter end. The Bank has recorded $515 thousand of cumulative impairment charges on this portfolio. Management continues to monitor these securities and it is possible that additional write-downs may occur if current loss trends continue. The Bank is currently participating in a class-action lawsuit against one PLMBS servicer that centers on defective warranties and representations made as part of the underwriting process.

The Bank held $1.9 million of restricted stock at June 30, 2014.  Except for $30 thousand, this investment represents stock in FHLB Pittsburgh. The Bank is required to hold this stock to be a member of FHLB and it is carried at cost of $100 per share.

FHLB stock is evaluated for impairment primarily based on an assessment of the ultimate recoverability of its cost. As a government sponsored entity, FHLB has the ability to raise funding through the U.S. Treasury that can be used to support its operations.  There is not a public market for FHLB stock and the benefits of FHLB membership (e.g., liquidity and low cost funding) add value to the stock beyond purely financial measures. Management intends to remain a member of the FHLB and believes that it will be able to fully recover the cost basis of this investment.

10


Note 6 . Loans

The Bank reports i t s loan portfolio based on the primary collateral of the loan. It further classifies these loans by the primary purpose, either consumer or commercial. The Bank’s residential real estate loans include long-term loans to individuals and businesses secured by mortgages on the borrower’s real property and include home equity loans .  Construction loans are made to finance the purchase of land and the construction of residential and commercial buildings thereon, and are secured by mortgages on real estate. Commercial real estate loans include construction, owner and non-owner occupied properties and farm real estate. Commercial loans are made to businesses of various sizes for a variety of purposes including property, plant and equipment, working capital and loans to government municipalities .  Commercial lending is concentrated in the Bank’s primary market, but also includes purchased loan participations. Consumer loans are comprised of installment loans and unsecured personal lines of credit.

A summary of loans outstanding, by primary collateral, at the end of the reporting periods is as follows:

Change

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014

December 31, 2013

Amount

%

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

Consumer first liens

$

102,849

$

103,573

$

(724)

(0.7)

Consumer junior liens and lines of credit

35,131

34,636

495

1.4

Total consumer

137,980

138,209

(229)

(0.2)

Commercial first lien

58,639

58,466

173

0.3

Commercial junior liens and lines of credit

4,940

5,939

(999)

(16.8)

Total commercial

63,579

64,405

(826)

(1.3)

Total residential real estate 1-4 family

201,559

202,614

(1,055)

(0.5)

Residential real estate - construction

Consumer

2,414

3,960

(1,546)

(39.0)

Commercial

8,868

8,559

309

3.6

Total residential real estate construction

11,282

12,519

(1,237)

(9.9)

Commercial real estate

322,465

329,373

(6,908)

(2.1)

Commercial

190,130

170,327

19,803

11.6

Total commercial

512,595

499,700

12,895

2.6

Consumer

7,283

8,580

(1,297)

(15.1)

732,719

723,413

9,306

1.3

Less: Allowance for loan losses

(9,519)

(9,702)

183

1.9

Net Loans

$

723,200

$

713,711

$

9,489

1.3

Included in the loan balances are the following:

Net unamortized deferred loan costs

$

472

$

372

Unamortized discount on purchased loans

$

(49)

$

(92)

Loans pledged as collateral for borrowings and commitments from:

FHLB

$

594,772

$

607,524

Federal Reserve Bank

57,689

45,809

$

652,461

$

653,333

11


Note 7 . Loan Quality

The following table presents, by c l ass , the activity in the Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL) for the periods ended:

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

Junior Liens &

Commercial

(Dollars in thousands)

First Liens

Lines of Credit

Construction

Real Estate

Commercial

Consumer

Total

Allowance at March 31, 2014

$

1,133

$

276

$

374

$

5,509

$

2,309

$

144

$

9,745

Charge-offs

(241)

-

-

(234)

(11)

(37)

(523)

Recoveries

-

-

-

-

13

18

31

Provision

187

(10)

(113)

137

55

10

266

Allowance at June 30, 2014

$

1,079

$

266

$

261

$

5,412

$

2,366

$

135

$

9,519

Allowance at December 31, 2013

$

1,108

$

278

$

291

$

5,571

$

2,306

$

148

$

9,702

Charge-offs

(257)

-

(27)

(348)

(12)

(80)

(724)

Recoveries

3

-

-

-

33

41

77

Provision

225

(12)

(3)

189

39

26

464

Allowance at June 30, 2014

$

1,079

$

266

$

261

$

5,412

$

2,366

$

135

$

9,519

Allowance at March 31, 2013

$

973

$

296

$

837

$

6,682

$

1,972

$

183

$

10,943

Charge-offs

(39)

-

-

-

(317)

(40)

(396)

Recoveries

1

-

-

3

68

16

88

Provision

430

(18)

(136)

45

479

3

803

Allowance at June 30, 2013

$

1,365

$

278

$

701

$

6,730

$

2,202

$

162

$

11,438

Allowance at December 31, 2012

$

913

$

306

$

899

$

6,450

$

1,620

$

191

$

10,379

Charge-offs

(39)

(45)

-

(167)

(327)

(84)

(662)

Recoveries

9

-

-

3

75

29

116

Provision

482

17

(198)

444

834

26

1,605

Allowance at June 30, 2013

$

1,365

$

278

$

701

$

6,730

$

2,202

$

162

$

11,438

12


The following table presents, by c la ss , loans that were evaluated for the ALL under the specific reserve (individually) and those that were evaluated under the general reserve (collectively) and the amount of the ALL established in each class as of June 3 0 , 201 4 and December 31, 201 3 :

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

Junior Liens &

Commercial

(Dollars in thousands)

First Liens

Lines of Credit

Construction

Real Estate

Commercial

Consumer

Total

June 30, 2014

Loans evaluated for allowance:

Individually

$

1,158

$

51

$

525

$

22,210

$

1,924

$

-

$

25,868

Collectively

160,330

40,020

10,757

300,255

188,206

7,283

706,851

Total

$

161,488

$

40,071

$

11,282

$

322,465

$

190,130

$

7,283

$

732,719

Allowance established for loans evaluated:

Individually

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

68

$

957

$

-

$

1,025

Collectively

1,079

266

261

5,344

1,409

135

8,494

Allowance at June 30, 2014

$

1,079

$

266

$

261

$

5,412

$

2,366

$

135

$

9,519

December 31, 2013

Loans evaluated for allowance:

Individually

$

2,354

$

50

$

537

$

25,107

$

1,996

$

-

$

30,044

Collectively

159,685

40,525

11,982

304,266

168,331

8,580

693,369

Total

$

162,039

$

40,575

$

12,519

$

329,373

$

170,327

$

8,580

$

723,413

Allowance established for loans evaluated:

Individually

$

9

$

-

$

-

$

89

$

1,002

$

-

$

1,100

Collectively

1,099

278

291

5,482

1,304

148

8,602

Allowance at December 31, 2013

$

1,108

$

278

$

291

$

5,571

$

2,306

$

148

$

9,702

13


The following table shows additional information about those loans considered to be impaired at June 3 0 , 201 4 and December 31, 201 3 :

Impaired Loans

With No Allowance

With Allowance

(Dollars in thousands)

Unpaid

Unpaid

Recorded

Principal

Recorded

Principal

Related

June 30, 2014

Investment

Balance

Investment

Balance

Allowance

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

$

2,271

$

2,348

$

-

$

-

$

-

Junior liens and lines of credit

120

145

-

-

-

Total

2,391

2,493

-

-

-

Residential real estate - construction

525

553

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

21,338

27,103

916

1,022

68

Commercial

139

392

1,898

2,019

957

Total

$

24,393

$

30,541

$

2,814

$

3,041

$

1,025

December 31, 2013

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

$

3,030

$

3,500

$

9

$

39

$

9

Junior liens and lines of credit

108

127

-

-

-

Total

3,138

3,627

9

39

9

Residential real estate - construction

537

556

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

24,188

30,334

966

1,043

89

Commercial

88

89

1,970

2,043

1,002

Total

$

27,951

$

34,606

$

2,945

$

3,125

$

1,100

14


The following table shows the average of impaired loans and related interest income for the th ree and six months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 and 201 3 :

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30, 2014

June 30, 2014

Average

Interest

Average

Interest

(Dollars in thousands)

Recorded

Income

Recorded

Income

Investment

Recognized

Investment

Recognized

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

$

2,289

$

15

$

2,753

$

25

Junior liens and lines of credit

120

-

123

-

Total

2,409

15

2,876

25

Residential real estate - construction

527

-

530

-

Commercial real estate

22,399

81

24,032

174

Commercial

2,056

-

2,074

1

Total

$

27,391

$

96

$

29,512

$

200

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30, 2013

June 30, 2013

Average

Interest

Average

Interest

(Dollars in thousands)

Recorded

Income

Recorded

Income

Investment

Recognized

Investment

Recognized

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

$

3,439

$

4

$

4,283

$

8

Junior liens and lines of credit

679

4

722

1

Total

4,118

8

5,005

9

Residential real estate - construction

550

-

692

-

Commercial real estate

29,705

96

24,218

36

Commercial

2,454

-

4,219

36

Total

$

36,827

$

104

$

34,134

$

81

15


The following table presents the aging of payments of the loan portfolio :

(Dollars in thousands)

Loans Past Due and Still Accruing

Total

Current

30-59 Days

60-89 Days

90 Days+

Total

Non-Accrual

Loans

June 30, 2014

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

$

159,292

$

316

$

213

$

392

$

921

$

1,275

$

161,488

Junior liens and lines of credit

39,811

111

28

11

150

110

40,071

Total

199,103

427

241

403

1,071

1,385

201,559

Residential real estate - construction

10,138

-

619

-

619

525

11,282

Commercial real estate

303,567

546

2,167

-

2,713

16,185

322,465

Commercial

187,344

225

18

-

243

2,543

190,130

Consumer

7,160

84

31

8

123

-

7,283

Total

$

707,312

$

1,282

$

3,076

$

411

$

4,769

$

20,638

$

732,719

December 31, 2013

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

$

156,916

$

1,725

$

497

$

302

$

2,524

$

2,599

$

162,039

Junior liens and lines of credit

40,204

204

19

41

264

107

40,575

Total

197,120

1,929

516

343

2,788

2,706

202,614

Residential real estate - construction

11,458

523

-

-

523

538

12,519

Commercial real estate

309,531

634

-

207

841

19,001

329,373

Commercial

167,747

78

60

44

182

2,398

170,327

Consumer

8,430

117

23

10

150

-

8,580

Total

$

694,286

$

3,281

$

599

$

604

$

4,484

$

24,643

$

723,413

16


The following table reports the internal credit rating for the loan portfolio.  Consumer purpose loans (mortgage, home equity and installment) are assigned a rating of either pass or substandard.  Substandard consumer loans are comprised of loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing and nonaccrual loans.  Commercial loans may be assigned any rating in accordance with the Bank’s internal risk rating system.

(Dollars in thousands)

Pass

Special Mention

Substandard

Doubtful

Total

June 30, 2014

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

$

153,596

$

2,880

$

5,012

$

-

$

161,488

Junior liens and lines of credit

39,708

-

363

-

40,071

Total

193,304

2,880

5,375

-

201,559

Residential real estate - construction

10,128

-

1,154

-

11,282

Commercial real estate

285,623

6,514

30,328

-

322,465

Commercial

171,302

9,134

9,694

-

190,130

Consumer

7,275

-

8

-

7,283

Total

$

667,632

$

18,528

$

46,559

$

-

$

732,719

December 31, 2013

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

$

150,762

$

3,653

$

7,624

$

-

$

162,039

Junior liens and lines of credit

40,102

66

407

-

40,575

Total

190,864

3,719

8,031

-

202,614

Residential real estate - construction

10,955

-

1,564

-

12,519

Commercial real estate

281,857

11,861

35,655

-

329,373

Commercial

154,888

3,393

12,046

-

170,327

Consumer

8,570

-

10

-

8,580

Total

$

647,134

$

18,973

$

57,306

$

-

$

723,413

17


The following table presents information on the Bank’s Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR) loans:

Troubled Debt Restructurings

That Have Defaulted on

(Dollars in thousands)

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Modified Terms YTD

Number of

Recorded

Number of

Recorded

Contracts

Investment

Performing*

Nonperforming*

Contracts

Investment

June 30, 2014

Residential real estate - construction

1

$

525

$

-

$

525

-

$

-

Residential real estate

5

603

603

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

12

15,556

14,609

947

-

-

Total

18

$

16,684

$

15,212

$

1,472

-

$

-

December 31, 2013

Residential real estate - construction

1

$

537

$

-

$

537

-

$

-

Residential real estate

5

625

625

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

12

15,877

14,318

1,559

-

-

Total

18

$

17,039

$

14,943

$

2,096

-

$

-

*The performing status is determined by the loan’s compliance with the modified terms .

There were no new TDR loans made during 2014.

The following table reports new TDR loans made during 2013, concession granted and the recorded investment as of June 3 0 , 2013:

New During Period

Number of

Pre-TDR

After-TDR

Recorded

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013

Contracts

Modification

Modification

Investment

Concession

Residential real estate

1

$

75

$

75

$

75

multiple

Commercial real estate

1

8,014

8,014

8,014

multiple

2

$

8,089

$

8,089

$

8,089

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

Residential real estate

1

$

75

$

75

$

75

multiple

Commercial real estate

2

10,458

10,745

10,659

multiple

3

$

10,533

$

10,820

$

10,734

18


Note 8. Pension

The c omponents of pension expense for the periods presented are as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30

Six Months Ended June 30

(Dollars in thousands)

2014

2013

2014

2013

Components of net periodic cost:

Service cost

$

83

$

114

$

169

$

228

Interest cost

194

179

391

358

Expected return on plan assets

(291)

(312)

(581)

(624)

Recognized net actuarial loss

81

159

163

318

Net period cost

$

67

$

140

$

142

$

280

The Bank expects its pension expense to de crease to approximately $ 27 5 thousand in 201 4 compared to $ 560 thousand in 201 3 .

Note 9 .  Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique.  Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Corporation could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated.  The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates.  As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates maybe different than the amounts reported at each year-end.

FASB ASC Topic 820, Financial Instruments , requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, including those financial assets and liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis. The Corporation does not report any nonfinancial assets at fair value. FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC Topic 820 are as follows:

Level 1 : Valuation is based on unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 : Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.  There may be substantial differences in the assumptions used for securities within the same level.  For example, prices for U.S. Agency securities have fewer assumptions and are closer to level 1 valuations than the private label mortgage backed securities that require more assumptions and are closer to level 3 valuations.

Level 3 : Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Corporation’s assumptions regarding what market participants would assume when pricing a financial instrument.

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments at June 3 0 , 201 4 and December 31, 201 3 .

Cash and Cash Equivalents: For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment securities :  The fair value of investment securities is determined in accordance with the methods described under FASB ASC Topic 820 as discussed below.

Restricted stock: The carrying value of restricted stock approximates its fair value based on redemption provisions for the restricted stock.

19


Loans held for sale : The fair value of loans held for sale is determined by the price set between the Bank and the purchaser prior to origination. These loans are usually sold at par.

Net loans: The fair value of fixed-rate loans is estimated for each major type of loan (e.g. real estate, commercial, industrial and agricultural and consumer) by discounting the future cash flows associated with such loans using rates currently offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of comparable credit quality.  The model considers scheduled principal maturities, repricing characteristics, prepayment assumptions and interest cash flows.  The discount rates used are estimated based upon consideration of a number of factors including the treasury yield curve, expense and service charge factors. For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit quality, carrying values approximate the fair value.

Accrued Interest Receivable: T he carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Mortgage servicing rights: The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on observable market prices when available or the present value of expected future cash flows when not available.  Assumptions such as loan default rates, costs to service, and prepayment speeds significantly affect the estimate of future cash flows. Mortgage servicing rights are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.

Deposits, Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Long-term debt: The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.  The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit and long-term debt is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates approximating those currently offered for certificates of deposit and borrowings with similar remaining maturities. For securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the carrying value approximates a reasonable estimate of the fair value.

Accrued interest payable: The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Derivatives: The fair value of the interest rate swaps is based on other similar financial instruments and is classified as Level 2.

The following information regarding the fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Corporation since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities.  Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Corporation’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.

20


The fair value of the Corporation's financial instruments are as follows:

June 30, 2014

Carrying

Fair

(Dollars in thousands)

Amount

Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

54,791

$

54,791

$

54,791

$

-

$

-

Investment securities available for sale

175,419

175,419

394

175,025

-

Restricted stock

1,938

1,938

-

1,938

-

Loans held for sale

600

600

-

600

-

Net loans

723,200

726,748

-

-

726,748

Accrued interest receivable

3,210

3,210

-

3,210

-

Mortgage servicing rights

176

176

-

-

176

Financial liabilities:

Deposits

$

900,704

$

901,068

$

-

$

901,068

$

-

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

2,264

2,264

-

2,264

-

Long-term debt

12,000

12,418

-

12,418

-

Accrued interest payable

206

206

-

206

-

Interest rate swaps

384

384

-

384

-

December 31, 2013

Carrying

Fair

(Dollars in thousands)

Amount

Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

40,745

$

40,745

$

40,745

$

-

$

-

Investment securities available for sale

159,674

159,674

1,970

157,704

-

Restricted stock

1,906

1,906

-

1,906

-

Loans held for sale

349

349

-

349

-

Net loans

713,711

722,119

-

-

722,119

Accrued interest receivable

3,087

3,087

-

3,087

-

Mortgage servicing rights

184

184

-

-

184

Financial liabilities:

Deposits

$

845,724

$

846,289

$

-

$

846,289

$

-

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

23,834

23,834

-

23,834

-

Long-term debt

12,403

12,999

-

12,999

-

Accrued interest payable

229

229

-

229

-

Interest rate swaps

561

561

-

561

-

21


Recurring Fair Value Measurements

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 3 0 , 201 4 and December 31, 201 3 are as follows:

(Dollars in Thousands)

Fair Value at June 30, 2014

Asset  Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Equity securities

$

394

$

-

$

-

$

394

Obligations of U.S. Government agencies

-

15,395

-

15,395

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

-

65,050

-

65,050

Corporate debt securities

-

1,000

-

1,000

Trust Preferred Securities

-

5,306

-

5,306

Agency mortgage-backed securities

-

86,352

-

86,352

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

-

1,876

-

1,876

Asset-backed securities

-

46

-

46

Total assets

$

394

$

175,025

$

-

$

175,419

Liability Description

Interest rate swaps

$

-

$

384

$

-

$

384

Total liabilities

$

-

$

384

$

-

$

384

(Dollars in Thousands)

Fair Value at December 31, 2013

Asset  Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Equity securities

$

1,970

$

-

$

-

$

1,970

Obligations of U.S. Government agencies

-

11,751

-

11,751

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

-

56,857

-

56,857

Corporate debt securities

-

1,001

-

1,001

Trust Preferred Securities

-

5,051

-

5,051

Agency mortgage-backed securities

-

81,027

-

81,027

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

-

1,969

-

1,969

Asset-backed securities

-

48

-

48

Total assets

$

1,970

$

157,704

$

-

$

159,674

Liability Description

Interest rate swaps

$

-

$

561

$

-

$

561

Total liabilities

$

-

$

561

$

-

$

561

The Corporation used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair values for financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis .

Investment securities :  Level 1 securities represent equity securities that are valued using quoted market prices from nationally recognized markets. Level 2 securities represent debt securities that are valued using a mathematical model based upon the specific characteristics of a security in relationship to quoted prices for similar securities.

Interest rate swaps : The interest rate swaps are valued using a discounted cash flow model that uses verifiable market environment inputs to calculate the fair value. This method is not depend e nt on the input of any significant judgments or assumptions by Management.

22


Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 3 0 , 201 4 and December 31, 201 3 are as follows:

(Dollars in Thousands)

Fair Value at June 30, 2014

Asset  Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Impaired loans (1)

$

-

$

-

$

2,730

$

2,730

Other real estate owned (1)

-

-

831

831

Mortgage servicing rights

-

-

176

176

Total assets

$

-

$

-

$

3,737

$

3,737

(Dollars in Thousands)

Fair Value at December 31, 2013

Asset  Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Impaired loans (1)

$

-

$

-

$

8,588

$

8,588

Other real estate owned (1)

-

-

498

498

Mortgage servicing rights

-

-

184

184

Total assets

$

-

$

-

$

9,270

$

9,270

(1)

Includes assets directly charged-down to fair value during the year-to-date period.

The Corporation used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair values for financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis .

Impaired loans : Impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.  Collateral values are estimated using Level 3 inputs based on customized discounting criteria.

Other real estate : The fair value of other real estate, upon initial recognition, is estimated using Level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy based on observable market data and Level 3 inputs based on customized discounting criteria.  In connection with the measurement and initial recognition of the foregoing assets, the Corporation recognizes charge-offs through the allowance for loan losses.

Mortgage servicing rights : The fair value of mortgage servicing rights, upon initial recognition, is estimated using a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income.  The model incorporates Level 3 assumptions such as cost to service, discount rate, prepayment speeds, default rates and losses.

The Corporation did not record any liabilities at fair value for which measurement of the fair value was made on a nonrecurring basis at June 3 0 , 201 4 . For financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, there were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 during the period ending June 3 0 , 201 4 .

23


The following table presents additional quantitative information about Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

(Dollars in Thousands)

at June 30, 2014

Range

Asset  Description

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input

(Weighted Average)

Impaired loans (1)

$

2,730

Appraisal

Appraisal Adjustments (2)

0% - 100% (30.44%)

Cost to sell

0% - 10%  (4.70%)

Other real estate owned (1)

831

Appraisal

Appraisal Adjustments (2)

Cost to sell

8% (8%)

Mortgage servicing rights

176

Discounted Cash Flow (3)

at December 31, 2013

Impaired loans (1)

$

8,588

Appraisal

Appraisal Adjustments (2)

0% - 60% (5%)

Cost to sell

5% - 13.5%  (7%)

Other real estate owned (1)

498

Appraisal

Appraisal Adjustments (2)

Cost to sell

8% (8%)

Mortgage servicing rights

184

Discounted Cash Flow (3)

(1) Includes assets directly charged-down to fair value during the year-to-date period.

(2) Qualitative adjustments are discounts specific to each asset and are made as needed.

(3) Valuation and inputs are determined by a third-party pricing service without adjustment.

Note 1 0 .  Financial Derivatives

The Board of Directors has given Management authorization to enter into additional derivative activity including interest rate swaps, caps and floors, forward-rate agreements, options and futures contracts in order to hedge interest rate risk.  The Bank is exposed to credit risk equal to the positive fair value of a derivative instrument, if any, as a positive fair value indicates that the counterparty to the agreement is financially liable to the Bank.  To limit this risk, counterparties must have an investment grade long-term debt rating and individual counterparty credit exposure is limited by Board approved parameters.  Management anticipates continuing to use derivatives, as permitted by its Board-approved policy, to manage interest rate risk.

Information regarding the interest rate swaps as of June 3 0 , 201 4 follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Amount Expected to

be Expensed into

Notional

Maturity

Interest Rate

Earnings within the

Amount

Date

Fixed

Variable

next 12 Months

$

10,000

5/30/2015

3.87%

0.04%

$

351

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows as of June 3 0 , 201 4 and December 31, 201 3 :

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

(Dollars in thousands)

Balance Sheet

Date

Type

Location

Fair Value

June 30, 2014

Interest rate contracts

Other liabilities

$

384

December 31, 2013

Interest rate contracts

Other liabilities

$

561

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Income for the Three and Six Months E nded June 3 0 , 201 4 and 20 1 3 follows:

24


Derivatives in ASC Topic 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

(Dollars in thousands)

Amount of Gain

Location of

or (Loss)

Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in

Recognized in

Income on

Location of

Amount of Gain

Income on

Derivatives

Amount of Gain

Gain or (Loss)

or (Loss)

Derivative (Ineffective

(Ineffective Portion

or (Loss)

Reclassified from

Reclassified from

Portion and Amount

and Amount

Recognized in OCI

Accumulated OCI

Accumulated OCI

Excluded from

Excluded from

net of tax on Derivative

into Income

into Income

Effectiveness

Effectiveness

Date / Type

(Effective Portion)

(Effective Portion)

(Effective Portion)

Testing)

Testing)

Interest rate contracts

Three months ended:

June 30, 2014

$

60

Interest Expense

$

(94)

Other income (expense)

$

-

June 30, 2013

$

128

Interest Expense

$

(152)

Other income (expense)

$

-

Six months ended:

June 30, 2014

$

117

Interest Expense

$

(189)

Other income (expense)

$

-

June 30, 2013

$

248

Interest Expense

$

(332)

Other income (expense)

$

-

Interest Rate Swap Agreements (“Swap Agreements”)

The Bank has entered into interest rate swap agreements as part of its asset/liability management program.  The swap agreements are free-standing derivatives and are recorded at fair value in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of condition.  The Bank is party to master netting arrangements with its financial institution counterparties; however, the Bank does not offset assets and liabilities under these arrangements for financial statement presentation purposes.  The master netting arrangements provide for a single net settlement of all swap agreements, as well as collateral, in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract.  Collateral, in the form of marketable securities, is posted by the counterparty with net liability positions in accordance with contract thresholds.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase (“Repurchase Agreements”)

The Bank enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities.  Under these arrangements, the Bank may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Bank to repurchase the agreements.  As a result, these repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing arrangements (i.e., secured borrowings) and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities.  The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of condition, while the securities underlying the repurchase agreements remain in the respective investment securities asset accounts.  In other words, there is no offsetting or netting of the investment securities assets with the repurchase agreement liabilities.  In addition, as the Bank does not enter into reverse repurchase agreements, there is no such offsetting to be done with repurchase agreements.

25


The following table presents the liabilities subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or repurchase agreements as of June 3 0 , 201 4 and December 31, 201 3 .  As of these dates, all of the Bank’s swap agreement with an institutional counterpart y w as in a liability position.  Therefore, there were no assets to be recognized in the consolidated statements of condition.  The Bank has no swap agreements with our commercial banking customers .

Net Amounts

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the

Gross

Gross Amounts

of Liabilities

Statements of Condition

Amounts of

Offset in the

Presented in the

Recognized

Statements of

Statements of

Financial

Cash Collateral

Net

(Dollars in thousands)

Liabilities

Condition

Condition

Instruments

Pledged

Amount

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

June 30, 2014

$

384

$

-

$

384

$

384

$

-

$

-

December 31, 2013

$

561

$

-

$

561

$

561

$

-

$

-

1 Note 1 1 . Reclassification

Certain prior period amounts may have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.  Such reclassifications did not affect reported net income .

26


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 3 0 , 201 4 and 201 3

Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements appearing herein which are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such forward-looking statements refer to a future period or periods, reflecting management’s current views as to likely future developments, and use words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” or similar terms.  Because forward-looking statements involve certain risks, uncertainties and other factors over which the Corporation has no direct control, actual results could differ materially from those contemplated in such statements.  These factors include (but are not limited to) the following: general economic conditions, changes in interest rates, changes in the Corporation’s cost of funds, changes in government monetary policy, changes in government regulation and taxation of financial institutions, changes in the rate of inflation, changes in technology, the intensification of competition within the Corporation’s market area, and other similar factors.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management has identified critical accounting policies for the Corporation to include Allowance for Loan Losses, Mortgage Servicing Rights, Financial Derivatives, Temporary Investment Impairment and Stock-based Compensation.  There were no changes to the critical accounting policies disclosed in the 201 3 Annual Report on Form 10-K in regards to application or related judgments and estimates used.  Please refer to Item 7 of the Corporation’s 201 3 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed disclosure of the critical accounting policies.

Results of Operations

Year-to-Date Summary

At June 3 0 , 201 4 , total assets were $1.0 2 3 billion, an increase of $ 38.0 million from December 31, 201 3 . Net loans in creased to $7 23 . 2 million and total deposits increased to $ 900 . 7 million.  The Corporation reported net income for the first six months of 201 4 of $ 4.1 million.  This is a 42.6 % increase versus net income of $ 2 . 9 million for the same period in 201 3 . Total revenue (interest income and noninterest income) decreased $ 185 thousand year-over-year. Interest income decreased $ 643 thousand , while interest expense decrease d by $ 891 thousand , resulting in a $ 248 thousand in crease in net interest income. The provision for loan losses was $ 464 thousand for the period, $ 1.1 million less than in 201 3 . Noninterest income increased $ 458 thousand , while n oninterest expense increased $96 thousand . Income tax expense doubled from $506 thousand in 2013 to $1.0 million in 2014. The effective tax rate increased from 14.8% in 2013 to 19.7% in 2014 due to tax exempt income comprising a less significant amount of income before federal income taxes. Diluted earnings per share increased to $ . 99 in 201 4 from $. 70 in 201 3 .

27


Key performance ratios as of, or for the six months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 and 201 3 are listed below:

June 30,

2014

2013

Performance measurements

Return on average assets*

0.82%

0.56%

Return on average equity*

8.60%

6.34%

Return on average tangible assets (1)*

0.85%

0.59%

Return on average tangible equity (1)*

9.77%

7.38%

Efficiency ratio (1)

70.63%

72.66%

Net interest margin*

3.56%

3.35%

Current dividend yield*

3.42%

4.25%

Dividend payout ratio

34.23%

48.14%

Shareholders' Value (per common share)

Diluted earnings per share

$

0.99

$

0.70

Basic earnings per share

0.99

0.71

Regular cash dividends paid

0.34

0.34

Book value

23.85

22.44

Tangible book value (1)

21.57

20.04

Market value

19.90

16.00

Market value/book value ratio

83.44%

71.30%

Price/earnings multiple*

10.05

11.43

Safety and Soundness

Risk-based capital ratio (Total)

14.53%

13.06%

Leverage ratio (Tier 1)

9.26%

8.41%

Common equity ratio

9.78%

8.98%

Tangible common equity ratio (1)

8.93%

8.10%

Nonperforming loans/gross loans

2.87%

4.26%

Nonperforming assets/total assets

2.46%

3.52%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of loans

1.30%

1.57%

Net charge-offs/average loans*

0.18%

0.15%

Trust assets under management (fair value)

$

582,647

$

557,776

* Annualized

(1) See GAAP versus Non-GAAP disclosures that follow

28


GAAP versus Non-GAAP Disclosure The Corporation supplements its traditional GAAP measurements with Non-GAAP measurements. The Non-GAAP measurements include Return on Average Tangible Assets, Return on Average Tangible Equity, Tangible Book Value and Tangible Common Equity ratio. As a result of merger transactions, intangible assets (primarily goodwill, core deposit intangibles and customer list) were created. The Non-GAAP disclosures are intended to eliminate the effects of the intangible assets and allow for better comparisons to periods when such assets did not exist.  However, not all companies use the same calculation methods for the same non-GAAP measurements and therefore may not be comparable. The following table shows the adjustments made between the GAAP and NON-GAAP measurements:

GAAP Measurement

Calculation

Return on Average Assets

Net Income / Average Assets

Return on Average Equity

Net Income / Average Equity

Book Value

Total Shareholders’ Equity / Shares Outstanding

Common Equity Ratio

Total Shareholders’ Equity / Total Assets

Non- GAAP Measurement

Calculation

Return on Average Tangible Assets

Net Income plus Intangible Amortization (net of tax) / Average Assets less Average Intangible Assets

Return on Average Tangible Equity

Net Income plus Intangible Amortization (net of tax) / Average Equity less Average Intangible Assets

Tangible Book Value

Total Shareholders’ Equity less Intangible Assets / Shares outstanding

Tangible Common Equity Ratio

Efficiency Ratio

Total Shareholders’ Equity less Intangible Assets / Total Assets less Intangible Assets

Noninterest expense  / tax equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less net securities gains or losses

Comparison of the three months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 to the three months ended June 3 0 , 201 3 :

Net Interest Income

The most important source of the Corporation’s earnings is net interest income, which is defined as the difference between income on interest-earning assets and the expense of interest-bearing liabilities supporting those assets.  Principal categories of interest-earning assets are loans and securities, while deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase (Repos), short-term borrowings and long-term debt are the principal categories of interest-bearing liabilities.  Demand deposits enhance net interest income because they are noninterest-bearing deposits. For the purpose of this discussion, balance sheet items refer to the average balance for the year and net interest income is adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis.  This tax-equivalent adjustment facilitates performance comparisons between taxable and tax-free assets by increasing the tax-free income by an amount equivalent to the Federal income taxes that would have been paid if this income were taxable at the Corporation’s 34% Federal statutory rate.

Tax equivalent net interest income for the second quarter of 201 4 in creased $4 61 thousand quarter over quarter.  Average interest-earning assets de creased $ 29.6 million from 201 3 , but the yield on these assets in creased by 11 basis points.  The average balance of investment securities increased $ 25. 5 million while average loans decreased $ 2. 2 million quarter over quarter.  Average mortgage loans increased $ 5 . 7 million, but the increase was offset by a decrease in the average balance of commercial loans and consumer loans.  Average commercial loans decreased $ 5 .4 million, as new originations did not surpass continued run- off.  Average consumer loans, including home equity loans, decreased $ 2 .6 million, as consumers continue to borrow less.

Interest expense was $ 8 17 thousand for the second quarter, a decrease of $ 4 79 thousand from the 201 3 total of $ 1. 3 million.  Average interest-bearing liabilities de creased $4 8 . 8 million to $ 78 8 . 8 million for 201 4 from an average balance of $8 3 7 . 7 million in 201 3 .  The average cost of these liabilities decreased from . 6 2 % in 201 3 to . 4 2 % in 201 4 .  Average interest-bearing deposits de creased $ 22 . 3 million and t he cost of these deposits decreased from . 5 9 % to . 3 6 %. The decrease was primarily due to $46.9 million of brokered deposits that were called or matured in May 2013. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (Repos) decreased $ 2 6 . 4 million on average over the prior year quarter while the average rate remained constant at . 1 5% in both years. The average balance of long-term debt decreased $ 1 21 thousand, due to prepayments and amortizations .

29


The changes in the balance sheet and interest rates resulted in a n in crease in tax equivalent net interest income of $4 61 thousand to $8. 4 million in 201 4 compared to $8. 0 million in 201 3 . This in crease was due to a $ 275 thousand in crease from high er volume and a $186 thousand increase due to changes in rates.

The following table presents average balances, tax-equivalent (T/E) interest income, and yields earned or rates paid on the assets or liabilities.  All nontaxable interest income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34%.

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

2014

2013

Average

Income or

Average

Average

Income or

Average

(Dollars in thousands)

balance

expense

yield/rate

balance

expense

yield/rate

Interest-earning assets:

Interest-bearing obligations of other

banks and federal funds sold

$

48,903

$

45

0.37%

$

101,799

$

73

0.29%

Investment securities:

Taxable

125,219

692

2.22%

103,062

387

1.51%

Nontaxable

46,397

563

4.86%

43,027

561

5.23%

Loans:

Commercial, industrial and agricultural

582,877

6,184

4.20%

588,246

6,408

4.37%

Residential mortgage

82,954

854

4.13%

77,231

818

4.25%

Home equity loans and lines

58,750

772

5.27%

59,513

869

5.86%

Consumer

7,786

149

7.68%

9,592

161

6.73%

Loans

732,367

7,959

4.31%

734,582

8,256

4.51%

Total interest-earning assets

952,886

9,259

3.90%

982,470

9,277

3.79%

Other assets

71,627

73,223

Total assets

$

1,024,513

$

1,055,693

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Deposits:

Interest-bearing checking

$

206,850

60

0.12%

$

171,308

36

0.08%

Money Management

391,283

424

0.43%

404,394

501

0.50%

Savings

63,704

12

0.08%

60,783

14

0.09%

Time

107,865

198

0.74%

155,525

611

1.58%

Total interest-bearing deposits

769,702

694

0.36%

792,010

1,162

0.59%

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

6,855

2

0.15%

33,260

12

0.15%

Long- term debt

12,286

121

3.93%

12,407

122

3.94%

Total interest-bearing liabilities

788,843

817

0.42%

837,677

1,296

0.62%

Noninterest-bearing deposits

129,464

116,700

Other liabilities

7,871

8,262

Shareholders' equity

98,335

93,054

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$

1,024,513

$

1,055,693

T/E net interest income/Net interest margin

8,442

3.55%

7,981

3.26%

Tax equivalent adjustment

(498)

(401)

Net interest income

$

7,944

$

7,580

30


Provision for Loan Losses

For the second quarter of 201 4 , the Bank recorded net charge-offs of $ 492 thousand compared to $ 308 thousand in 201 3 . P rovision expense for the second quarter was $ 266 thousand and as a result, the allowance for loan losses (ALL) de creased $ 183 thousand over year-end 201 3 .  For more information refer to the Loan Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses discussion in the Financial Condition section.

Noninterest Income

For the second quarter of 201 4 , noninterest income in creased $ 4 61 thousand from the same period in 201 3 .  Investment and trust service fees de creased due to lower nonre curring estate fees. Loan service charges in creased due to commercial origination fees. Mortgage banking fees de creased, as 201 4 had lower reversal s of previously recorded impairment charges compared to prior year .  Deposit service charges in creased due to higher account analysis fees and higher retail and commercial overdraft fees.  Other service charges and fees in creased primarily due to in creases in ATM fees, while debit card income also increased. The net losses in o ther real estate owned decreased from prior year due to l ess write down s in 2014 . No other than temporary impairment charges were recorded in 2014 compared to OTTI losses on 3 equity securities in 2013 .  S ecurity gains were higher in 2014 compared to prior year as the Corporation liquidated the majority of its equity portfolio.

The following table presents a comparison of noninterest income for the three months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 and 201 3 :

For the Three Months Ended

June 30

Change

(Dollars in thousands)

2014

2013

Amount

%

Noninterest Income

Investment and trust services fees

$

1,101

$

1,130

$

(29)

(2.6)

Loan service charges

250

192

58

30.2

Mortgage banking activities

19

40

(21)

(52.5)

Deposit service charges and fees

525

452

73

16.2

Other service charges and fees

317

233

84

36.1

Debit card income

337

316

21

6.6

Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance

144

153

(9)

(5.9)

Other real estate owned

(62)

(141)

79

(56.0)

Other

10

47

(37)

(78.7)

OTTI losses recognized in income

-

(50)

50

N/A

Securities gain (losses), net

221

29

192

662.1

Total noninterest income

$

2,862

$

2,401

$

461

19.2

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the second quarter of 201 4 de creased $ 10 thousand compared to the same period in 201 3 .  The increase in salaries and benefits was primarily due to annual salary adjustments ($ 85 thousand) and health insurance expense ($ 39 thousand), but these increases were partially offset by a $ 73 thousand decrease in pension expense. Net o ccupancy expense increased due to higher depreciation and real estate tax expenses . Data processing expenses increased as all 2014 payments to a particular vendor were made in second quarter compared to payments being made in the second and third quarters in 2013 . Bank shares tax expense decreased year over year due to a change by the state of Pennsylvania in the method of calculating the shares tax. Other expenses de creased due to declines in supply expense and other real estate carrying costs .

31


The following table presents a comparison of noninterest expense for the three months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 and 201 3 :

For the Three Months Ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30

Change

Noninterest Expense

2014

2013

Amount

%

Salaries and benefits

$

4,107

$

4,018

$

89

2.2

Net occupancy expense

586

568

18

3.2

Furniture and equipment expense

237

244

(7)

(2.9)

Advertising

270

317

(47)

(14.8)

Legal and professional fees

353

359

(6)

(1.7)

Data processing

493

451

42

9.3

Pennsylvania bank shares tax

173

204

(31)

(15.2)

Intangible amortization

104

106

(2)

(1.9)

FDIC insurance

222

270

(48)

(17.8)

ATM/debit card processing

178

165

13

7.9

Other

892

923

(31)

(3.4)

Total noninterest expense

$

7,615

$

7,625

$

(10)

(0.1)

Provision for Income Taxes

For the second quarter of 201 4 the Corporation recorded a Federal income tax expense of $ 606 thousand compared to $ 198 thousand for the same quarter in 201 3 . While pretax income was higher in 2014 due primarily to less provision expense, 2013 benefited from a higher ratio of tax exempt income to pre-tax income. As a result, t he effective tax rate increased quarter over quarter to 20 . 7 % for the second quarter of 201 4 compared to 1 2 . 7 % for 201 3 .  All taxable income for the Corporation is taxed at a rate of 34%.

Comparison of the six months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 to the six months ended June 3 0 , 201 3 :

Net Interest Income

Tax equivalent net interest income for the first half of 201 4 in creased $ 417 thousand year over year .  Average interest-earning assets de creased $ 3 4. 9 million from 201 3 , but the yield on these assets in creased by 5 basis points.  The average balance of investment securities increased $ 25. 3 million while average loans decreased $ 15 . 3 million ( 2 . 1 %) year over year .  Average mortgage loans increased $ 7 . 5 million, but the increase was offset by a decrease in the average balance of commercial loans and consumer loans.  Average commercial loans decreased $ 19 . 3 million, as commercial loans continue to run- off.  Average consumer loans, including home equity loans, decreased $ 3 .6 million, as consumers continue to borrow less.

Interest expense was $ 1.6 million for the first half of 2014 , a decrease of $ 89 1 thousand from the 201 3 total of $ 2 . 5 million.  Average interest-bearing liabilities de creased $ 48 . 1 million to $ 78 6 . 1 million for 201 4 from an average balance of $8 3 4 . 2 million in 201 3 .  The average cost of these liabilities decreased from . 61 % in 201 3 to . 4 2 % in 201 4 .  Average interest-bearing deposits de creased $ 20 .2 million and t he cost of these deposits decreased from . 5 8% to . 3 7 %. The decrease was primarily due to $46.9 million of brokered deposits that were called or matured in May 2013. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (Repos) decreased $ 2 7 . 8 million on average over the prior year quarter while the average rate remained constant at . 1 5% in both years. The average balance of long-term debt decreased $ 71 thousand, due to prepayments and amortizations .

The changes in the balance sheet and interest rates resulted in a n in crease in tax equivalent net interest income of $4 1 7 thousand to $ 16 . 6 million in 2014 compared to $ 16 . 2 million in 2013.  This in crease was due to a $ 269 thousand in crease from highe r volume a nd a $ 148 thousand increase due to changes in rates.

The Bank’s net interest margin in creased from 3. 3 5% in 201 3 to 3.5 6 % in 201 4 .  The in crease in the net interest margin is the result of a n in crease in the rate on interest-earning assets of 5 basis points, compared to a decrease in the yield on interest-bearing liabilities of 19 basis points.

The following table presents average balances, tax-equivalent (T/E) interest income, and yields earned or rates paid on the assets or liabilities.  All nontaxable interest income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34%.

32


For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2014

2013

Average

Income or

Average

Average

Income or

Average

(Dollars in thousands)

balance

expense

yield/rate

balance

expense

yield/rate

Interest-earning assets:

Interest-bearing obligations of other

banks and federal funds sold

$

47,550

$

84

0.36%

$

92,396

$

131

0.29%

Investment securities:

Taxable

122,885

1,358

2.23%

99,223

757

1.54%

Nontaxable

43,755

1,101

5.32%

42,084

1,114

5.34%

Loans:

Commercial, industrial and agricultural

578,084

12,179

4.19%

597,370

12,990

4.39%

Residential mortgage

82,841

1,713

4.17%

75,335

1,672

4.48%

Home equity loans and lines

59,061

1,558

5.32%

60,357

1,768

5.91%

Consumer

8,077

301

7.52%

10,346

336

6.55%

Loans

728,063

15,751

4.31%

743,408

16,766

4.55%

Total interest-earning assets

942,253

18,294

3.92%

977,111

18,768

3.87%

Other assets

71,420

73,207

Total assets

$

1,013,673

$

1,050,318

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Deposits:

Interest-bearing checking

$

197,481

109

0.11%

$

158,861

61

0.08%

Money Management

391,317

845

0.44%

396,236

1,049

0.53%

Savings

62,325

24

0.08%

59,471

30

0.10%

Time

110,112

418

0.77%

166,915

1,125

1.36%

Total interest-bearing deposits

761,235

1,396

0.37%

781,483

2,265

0.58%

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

12,548

9

0.15%

40,351

30

0.15%

Long- term debt

12,343

242

3.92%

12,414

243

3.95%

Total interest-bearing liabilities

786,126

1,647

0.42%

834,248

2,538

0.61%

Noninterest-bearing deposits

122,807

115,672

Other liabilities

7,573

7,945

Shareholders' equity

97,167

92,453

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$

1,013,673

$

1,050,318

T/E net interest income/Net interest margin

16,647

3.56%

16,230

3.35%

Tax equivalent adjustment

(959)

(790)

Net interest income

$

15,688

$

15,440

33


Provision for Loan Losses

For 201 4 , the Bank recorded net charge-offs of $ 647 thousand compared to $ 546 thousand in 201 3 . The charge-offs were offset by the provision expense of $ 464 thousand for the year and as a result, the allowance for loan losses (ALL) de creased $ 1 83 thousand over year-end 201 3 .  For more information refer to the Loan Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses discussion in the Financial Condition section.

Noninterest Income

For the first half of 201 4 , noninterest income in creased $ 4 58 thousand from the same period in 201 3 .  Investment and trust service fees increased due to higher recurring asset management fees. Loan service charg es decreased as mortgage production fees declined in 201 4 compared to 201 3, and from lower service charges on commercial and consumer loans. Mortgage banking fees in creased, as 201 4 had lower amortization costs co mpared to 2013 .  Deposit service charges in creased due to higher account analysis fees and higher retail and commercial overdraft fees.  Other service charges and fees in creased primarily due to in creases in ATM fees, while debit card income also increased. Net losses on o ther real estate owned in creased from prior year due to larger write-down s in 2014 compared to 2013 . No other than temporary impairment charges were recorded in 2014 compared to OTTI losses on 3 equity securities in 2013 . S ecurity gains were higher in 2014 compared to prior year as the Corporation liquidated the majority of its equity portfolio.

The following table presents a comparison of noninterest income for the six months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 and 201 3 :

For the Six Months Ended

June 30

Change

(Dollars in thousands)

2014

2013

Amount

%

Noninterest Income

Investment and trust services fees

$

2,192

$

2,148

$

44

2.0

Loan service charges

418

442

(24)

(5.4)

Mortgage banking activities

32

18

14

77.8

Deposit service charges and fees

990

888

102

11.5

Other service charges and fees

584

455

129

28.4

Debit card income

643

602

41

6.8

Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance

286

305

(19)

(6.2)

Other real estate owned

(185)

(141)

(44)

31.2

Other

62

89

(27)

(30.3)

OTTI losses recognized in income

-

(50)

50

N/A

Securities gain (losses), net

221

29

192

662.1

Total noninterest income

$

5,243

$

4,785

$

458

9.6

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the first half of 201 4 increased $ 9 6 thousand compared to the same period in 201 3 .  The increase in salaries and benefits was primarily due to annual salary adjustments ($ 227 thousand), but these increases were partially offset by a $1 60 thousand decrease in health insurance and a $ 138 thousand decrease in pension expense.  Health insurance expense declined due to lower claims expense during the year from the Bank’s participation in a self-insured health insurance plan . Net o ccupancy expense increased due to higher costs for snow removal and utilities in 2014 compared to 2013 . Data processing expenses increased as all 2014 payments to a particular vendor were made in second quarter compared to payments being made in the second and third quarters in 2013. Bank shares tax expense decreased year over year due to a change in the calculation. FDIC expense decrease d as the Corporation’s balance sheet was smaller in 2014 compared to 2013.

34


The following table presents a comparison of noninterest expense for the six months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 and 201 3 :

For the Six Months Ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30

Change

Noninterest Expense

2014

2013

Amount

%

Salaries and benefits

$

8,357

$

8,232

$

125

1.5

Net occupancy expense

1,262

1,136

126

11.1

Furniture and equipment expense

491

491

-

-

Advertising

586

652

(66)

(10.1)

Legal and professional fees

618

639

(21)

(3.3)

Data processing

884

845

39

4.6

Pennsylvania bank shares tax

347

409

(62)

(15.2)

Intangible amortization

207

213

(6)

(2.8)

FDIC insurance

454

515

(61)

(11.8)

ATM/debit card processing

357

346

11

3.2

Other

1,741

1,730

11

0.6

Total noninterest expense

$

15,304

$

15,208

$

96

0.6

Provision for Income Taxes

For the first half of 201 4 the Corporation recorded a Federal income tax expense of $ 1.0 million compared to $ 506 thousand for the same period in 201 3 . While pretax income was higher in 2014 due to primarily due to less provision expense, 2013 benefited from a higher ratio of tax exempt income to pre-tax income. As a result, t he effective tax rate increased year over year to 1 9 . 7 % for the first half of 201 4 compared to 1 4 . 8 % for 201 3 .  All taxable income for the Corporation is taxed at a rate of 34%.

Financial Condition

Summary:

At June 3 0 , 201 4 , assets totaled $1.0 2 3 b illion, an increase of $ 38 . 0 million from the 201 3 year-end balance of $ 984.6 m illion. Investment securities increased $ 15.7 million, while net loans in creased $ 9 . 5 million. Deposits were up $ 55 . 0 million in the first half of 201 4 due to increases in every deposit category except time deposits . Shareholders’ equity increased $ 4 . 6 million during the first six months as retained earnings increased approximately $ 2 . 7 million , other comprehensive loss improved $ 1.4 million and the Corporation’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) added an additional $ 3 74 thousand in new capital.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $ 54.8 million at June 30 , 201 4 , an increase of $ 14. 1 million from the prior year-end balance of $ 40 . 7 million.  The increase is due to inflows of deposits as well as slow loan growth opportunities. Interest-bearing deposits are held primarily at the Federal Reserve.

Investment Securities:

The investment portfolio has grown 8.5%, on a cost basis, since year-end 2013. However, the composition of the portfolio is essentially unchanged. Municipal securities and U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities continue to comprise the greatest portion of the portfolio at 37% and 50% of the portfolio, respectively. The Bank invested $28.4 million during the first six months of 2014 with the purchases spread between U.S. Agency securities, U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities and m unicipal securities.

The investment portfolio had a net unrealized gain of $1.2 million at June 30, compared to an unrealized loss of $741 thousand at year-end 2013. The trust preferred securities sector continues to hold the largest net unrealized loss.

The portfolio averaged $166.6 million with a yield of 2.98% for the first half of 2014. This compares to an average of $14 1 .3 million and a yield of 2.65% for the same period in 2013.  The improvement in the yield is primarily the result of a slow-down in prepayments on mortgage-backed securities.

During 2014, the equity portfolio was reduced significantly as the Corporation took advantage of price increases and sold selected holdings with gains. The municipal bond portfolio is well diversified geographically (issuers from within 28 states) and is comprised primarily of general obligation bonds (69%).  Most municipal bonds have credit enhancements in

35


the form of private bond insurance or other credit support. The largest geographic municipal bond exposure is to twenty issuers in the state of Texas with a fair value of $9.9 million and eleven issuers in the state of Pennsylvania with a fair value of $7.1 million. The municipal bond portfolio contains $6 3.7 million of bonds rated A, or higher and $1.4 million that are not rated by Moody’s rating agency.  No municipal bonds are rated below investment grade. The Bank holds one variable rate corporate bond in the financial services sector that will mature in September 2014.

The holdings of trust preferred investments and private-label mortgage-backed securities are unchanged since year-end and are detailed in separate tables .

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available for sale as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is as follows :

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross

Gross

Amortized

unrealized

unrealized

Fair

June 30, 2014

cost

gains

losses

value

Equity securities

$

110

$

284

$

-

$

394

U.S. Government agency securities

15,376

99

(80)

15,395

Municipal securities

64,018

1,762

(730)

65,050

Corporate debt securities

1,000

-

-

1,000

Trust preferred securities

5,931

-

(625)

5,306

Agency mortgage-backed securities

85,859

905

(412)

86,352

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

1,845

45

(14)

1,876

Asset-backed securities

48

-

(2)

46

$

174,187

$

3,095

$

(1,863)

$

175,419

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross

Gross

Amortized

unrealized

unrealized

Fair

December 31, 2013

cost

gains

losses

value

Equity securities

$

1,472

$

499

$

(1)

$

1,970

U.S. Government agency securities

11,771

94

(114)

11,751

Municipal securities

56,861

1,400

(1,404)

56,857

Corporate debt securities

1,002

-

(1)

1,001

Trust preferred securities

5,922

-

(871)

5,051

Agency mortgage-backed securities

81,352

726

(1,051)

81,027

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

1,984

16

(31)

1,969

Asset-backed securities

51

-

(3)

48

$

160,415

$

2,735

$

(3,476)

$

159,674

36


The following table provides additional detail about the Bank’s trust preferred securities as of June 3 0 , 201 4 :

(Dollars in thousands)

Deal Name

Single Issuer or Pooled

Class

Amortized Cost

Fair Value

Gross Unrealized Gain (Loss)

Lowest Credit Rating Assigned

Number of Banks Currently Performing

Deferrals and Defaults as % of Original Collateral

Expected Deferral/ Defaults as a Percentage of Remaining Performing Collateral

Huntington Cap Trust

Single

Preferred Stock

$

937

$

844

$

(93)

BB+

1

None

None

Huntington Cap Trust II

Single

Preferred Stock

887

821

(66)

BB+

1

None

None

BankAmerica Cap III

Single

Preferred Stock

962

836

(126)

BB+

1

None

None

Wachovia Cap Trust II

Single

Preferred Stock

276

257

(19)

BBB+

1

None

None

Corestates Captl Tr II

Single

Preferred Stock

934

871

(63)

BBB+

1

None

None

Chase Cap VI JPM

Single

Preferred Stock

961

865

(96)

BBB

1

None

None

Fleet Cap Tr V

Single

Preferred Stock

974

812

(162)

BB+

1

None

None

$

5,931

$

5,306

$

(625)

The following table provides additional detail about private label mortgage-backed securities as of June 3 0 , 201 4 :

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross

Cumulative

Origination

Amortized

Fair

Unrealized

Collateral

Lowest Credit

Credit

OTTI

Description

Date

Cost

Value

Gain (Loss)

Type

Rating Assigned

Support %

Charges

RALI 2004-QS4 A7

3/1/2004

$

129

$

134

$

5

ALT A

BBB+

12.53

$

-

MALT 2004-6 7A1

6/1/2004

424

444

20

ALT A

CCC

14.38

-

RALI 2005-QS2 A1

2/1/2005

308

321

13

ALT A

CC

5.78

10

RALI 2006-QS4 A2

4/1/2006

575

567

(8)

ALT A

D

-

293

GSR 2006-5F 2A1

5/1/2006

91

98

7

Prime

D

-

15

RALI 2006-QS8 A1

7/28/2006

318

312

(6)

ALT A

D

-

197

$

1,845

$

1,876

$

31

$

515

The investment portfolio contained 99 securities with $75.8 million of temporarily impaired fair value and $1.9 million in unrealized losses at June 30, 2014. The total unrealized loss position has improved by $1.6 million since year-end 2013.

For securities with an unrealized loss, Management applies a systematic methodology in order to perform an assessment of the potential for other-than-temporary impairment.  In the case of debt securities, investments considered for other-than-temporary impairment: (1) had a specified maturity or repricing date; (2) were generally expected to be redeemed at par, and (3) were expected to achieve a recovery in market value within a reasonable period of time. In addition, the Bank considers whether it intends to sell these securities or whether it will be forced to sell these securities before the earlier of amortized cost recovery or maturity. Equity securities are assessed for other-than-temporary impairment based on the length of time of impairment, dollar amount of the impairment and general market and financial conditions relating to specific issues.  The impairment identified on debt and equity securities and subject to assessment at June 30, 2014, was deemed to be temporary and required no further adjustments to the financial statements, unless otherwise noted.

37


The following table reflects temporary impairment in the investment portfolio (excluding restricted stock), aggregated by investment category, length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position and the number of securities in each category as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

June 30, 2014

Less than 12 months

12 months or more

Total

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

(Dollars in thousands)

Value

Losses

Count

Value

Losses

Count

Value

Losses

Count

U.S. Government agency securities

$

2,078

$

(2)

3

$

7,509

$

(78)

13

$

9,587

$

(80)

16

Municipal securities

10,051

(111)

14

15,070

(619)

21

25,121

(730)

35

Trust preferred securities

-

-

-

5,306

(625)

7

5,306

(625)

7

Agency mortgage-backed securities

20,400

(126)

21

14,472

(286)

17

34,872

(412)

38

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

-

-

-

879

(14)

2

879

(14)

2

Asset-backed securities

-

-

-

5

(2)

1

5

(2)

1

Total temporarily impaired securities

$

32,529

$

(239)

38

$

43,241

$

(1,624)

61

$

75,770

$

(1,863)

99

December 31, 2013

Less than 12 months

12 months or more

Total

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

(Dollars in thousands)

Value

Losses

Count

Value

Losses

Count

Value

Losses

Count

Equity securities

$

22

$

(1)

1

$

-

$

-

-

$

22

$

(1)

1

U.S. Government agency securities

3,971

(85)

7

3,807

(29)

7

7,778

(114)

14

Municipal securities

16,770

(1,022)

24

3,160

(382)

4

19,930

(1,404)

28

Corporate debt securities

-

-

-

1,001

(1)

1

1,001

(1)

1

Trust preferred securities

-

-

-

5,051

(871)

7

5,051

(871)

7

Agency mortgage-backed securities

40,395

(999)

38

2,213

(52)

4

42,608

(1,051)

42

Private-label mortgage-backed securities

-

-

-

911

(31)

2

911

(31)

2

Asset-backed securities

-

-

-

48

(3)

3

48

(3)

3

Total temporarily impaired securities

$

61,158

$

(2,107)

70

$

16,191

$

(1,369)

28

$

77,349

$

(3,476)

98

The municipal bond portfolio has the largest unrealized loss at $730 thousand, but this is $674 thousand less than at the prior-year end.  The unrealized loss in this portfolio is deemed to be non-credit related and no other-than-temporary impairment charges have been recorded.

The trust preferred portfolio contains seven securities with a fair value of $5.3 million and an unrealized loss of $62 5 thousand. The trust-preferred securities held by the Bank are single entity issues, not pooled trust preferred securities.  Therefore, the impairment review of these securities is based only on the issuer and the security cannot be impaired by the performance of other issuers as if it was a pooled trust-preferred bond. All of the Bank’s trust preferred securities are single issue, variable rate notes with long maturities (2027 – 2028).  None of these bonds have suspended or missed a dividend payment. At June 30, 2014, the Bank believes it will be able to collect all interest and principal due on these bonds and no other-than-temporary-impairment charges were recorded.

The PLMBS sector shows a gross unrealized loss of $14 thousand. These bonds were all rated AAA at time of purchase, but have since experienced rating declines. Some have experienced increased delinquencies and defaults, while others have seen the credit support increase as the bonds paid-down. The Bank monitors the performance of the PLMBS investments on a regular basis and reviews delinquencies, default rates, credit support levels and various cash flow stress test scenarios. In determining the credit related loss, Management considers all principal past due 60 days or more as a loss. If additional principal moves beyond 60 days past due, it will also be considered a loss. As a result of the analysis on PLMBS it was determined that no impairment charge was required at quarter end. The Bank has recorded $515 thousand of cumulative impairment charges on this portfolio. Management continues to monitor these securities and it is possible that additional write-downs may occur if current loss trends continue. The Bank is currently participating in a class-action lawsuit against one PLMBS servicer that centers on defective warranties and representations made as part of the underwriting process.

38


The following table represents the cumulative credit losses on securities recognized in earnings as of June 3 0 , 201 4 and 2013 .

(Dollars in thousands)

Six Months Ended

2014

2013

Balance of cumulative credit-related OTTI at January 1

$

515

$

490

Additions for credit-related OTTI not previously recognized

-

-

Additional increases for credit-related OTTI previously recognized when there is no intent to sell

and no requirement to sell before recovery of amortized cost basis

-

-

Decreases for previously recognized credit-related OTTI because there was an intent to sell

-

-

Reduction for increases in cash flows expected to be collected

-

-

Balance of credit-related OTTI at June 30

$

515

$

490

The Bank held $1.9 million of restricted stock at June 30, 2014.  Except for $30 thousand, this investment represents stock in FHLB Pittsburgh. The Bank is required to hold this stock to be a member of FHLB and it is carried at cost of $100 per share.

FHLB stock is evaluated for impairment primarily based on an assessment of the ultimate recoverability of its cost. As a government sponsored entity, FHLB has the ability to raise funding through the U.S. Treasury that can be used to support its operations.  There is not a public market for FHLB stock and the benefits of FHLB membership (e.g., liquidity and low cost funding) add value to the stock beyond purely financial measures. Management intends to remain a member of the FHLB and believes that it will be able to fully recover the cost basis of this investment.

Loans:

Residential real estate: This category is comprised of consumer purpose loans secured by residential real estate and to a lesser extent, commercial purpose loans secured by residential real estate.  The consumer purpose category represents traditional residential mortgage loans and home equity products (primarily junior liens and lines of credit). Commercial purpose loans in this category represent loans made for various business needs, but are secured with residential real estate. In addition to the real estate collateral, it is possible that additional security is provided by personal guarantees or UCC filings. These loans are underwritten as commercial loans and are not originated to be sold.

Total residential real estate loans de creased $ 1.1 million over 201 3 , primarily in the commercial junior liens and consumer first lien loan categor ies .  In the first half of 201 4 , the Bank originated $ 9 . 8 million in mortgages, including approximately $ 3 . 6 million for a fee through a third party brokerage agreement. The Bank does not originate or hold any loans that would be considered sub-prime or Alt-A, and does not generally originate mortgages outside of its primary market area.

Home equity lending has continued to be slow and the Bank has seen both the fixed rate loan product and the variable rate line product continue to decline in 201 4 . Many consumers have seen equity in their homes disappear or have been reluctant to borrow due to uncertainty in the economy. Despite low rates, the Bank expects that home equity lending will not pick up significantly until the overall economy improves.

Residential real estate construction: The largest component of this category represents loans to residential real estate developers ($ 8. 9 million), while loans for individuals to construct personal residences totaled $ 2 . 4 million at June 3 0 , 201 4 .  The Bank’s exposure to residential construction loans is concentrated primarily in south central Pennsylvania.

Real estate construction loans, including residential real estate and land development loans, frequently provide an interest reserve in order to assist the developer during the development stage when minimal cash flow is generated. All real estate construction loans are underwritten in the same manner, regardless of the use of an interest reserve. Real estate construction loans are monitored on a regular basis by either an independent third party inspector or the assigned loan officer depending on loan amount or complexity of the project. This monitoring process includes at a minimum, the submission of invoices and AIA documents of costs incurred by the borrower, on-site inspections, and a signature by the assigned loan officer for disbursement of funds. The Bank has no residential real estate construction loans with an interest reserve.

Commercial loans and commercial real estate: Loans in this category include commercial, industrial, farm, agricultural, land development and municipal government loans. Collateral for these loans may include commercial real estate, farm real estate, equipment or other business assets. Total commercial real estate loans de creased to $ 322.5 million from $ 329.4 million at the end of 201 3 . At June 3 0 , 201 4 , the Bank had $ 9 . 3 million in land development real estate construction loans funded with an interest reserve and capitalized $ 25 thousand of interest from these reserves on active projects. The largest sectors (by collateral) in the commercial real estate category are: land development ($5 4 . 6 million),

39


office buildings ($ 3 8 . 1 million) , farm land ($37.3 million), hotels and motels ($3 4 . 4 million), and auto dealerships ($ 18 . 4 million ) . Commercial loans in creased by 2 . 6 % compared to year end , an increase of $ 12 . 9 million .   The largest sectors (by industry) in the commercial loan category are: utilities ($ 30 . 1 million), manufacturing ($2 8 . 2 million), retail trade ($22.4 million), public administration ($ 20.7 million) , and construction ($1 7 . 3 million).  The Ba nk is very active in its market in pursuing commercial lending opportunities, but supplements in-market growth with purchased loan participations. The Bank purchases commercial loan participations in an effort to increase its commercial lending and diversify its loan mix, both geographically and by industry sector.  Purchased loans are originated primarily within the south central Pennsylvania market and are purchased from only a few select counter parties. These loans usually represent an opportunity to participate in larger credits that are not available in market, with the benefit of lower origination and servicing costs .  In the first half of 201 4 , the Bank purchased $ 1 1. 6 million of loan participations and commitments.  At June 30 , 201 4 , the Bank held $1 33 . 9 million in purchased loan participations in its portfolio.

Consumer loans decreased $ 1.3 million due primarily to regular payments and maturities.  The Bank believes consumer portfolio will continue to run-down, as consumers are unwilling to increase their debt.

The following table presents a summary of loans outstanding, by primary collateral as of:

Change

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014

December 31, 2013

Amount

%

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

Consumer first liens

$

102,849

$

103,573

$

(724)

(0.7)

Consumer junior liens and lines of credit

35,131

34,636

495

1.4

Total consumer

137,980

138,209

(229)

(0.2)

Commercial first lien

58,639

58,466

173

0.3

Commercial junior liens and lines of credit

4,940

5,939

(999)

(16.8)

Total commercial

63,579

64,405

(826)

(1.3)

Total residential real estate 1-4 family

201,559

202,614

(1,055)

(0.5)

Residential real estate - construction

Consumer

2,414

3,960

(1,546)

(39.0)

Commercial

8,868

8,559

309

3.6

Total residential real estate construction

11,282

12,519

(1,237)

(9.9)

Commercial real estate

322,465

329,373

(6,908)

(2.1)

Commercial

190,130

170,327

19,803

11.6

Total commercial

512,595

499,700

12,895

2.6

Consumer

7,283

8,580

(1,297)

(15.1)

732,719

723,413

9,306

1.3

Less: Allowance for loan losses

(9,519)

(9,702)

183

1.9

Net Loans

$

723,200

$

713,711

$

9,489

1.3

Included in the loan balances are the following:

Net unamortized deferred loan costs

$

472

$

372

Unamortized discount on purchased loans

$

(49)

$

(92)

Loans pledged as collateral for borrowings and commitments from:

FHLB

$

594,772

$

607,524

Federal Reserve Bank

57,689

45,809

$

652,461

$

653,333

40


Loan Quality :

Management utilizes a risk rating scale ranging from 1 (Prime) to 9 (Loss) to evaluate loan quality. This risk rating scale is used primarily for commercial purpose loans. Consumer purpose loans are identified as either a pass or substandard rating. Substandard consumer loans are loans that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing.  Loans rated 1 – 4 are considered pass credits. Loans that are rated 5 are pass credits, but have been identified as credits that are likely to warrant additional attention and monitoring. Loans rated 6 (Special Mention) or worse begin to receive enhanced monitoring and reporting by the Bank. Loans rated 7 (Substandard) or 8 (Doubtful) exhibit the greatest financial weakness and present the greatest possible risk of loss to the Bank. Nonaccrual loans are rated no better than 7.   The following factors represent some of the factors used in determining the risk rating of a borrower: cash flow, debt coverage, liquidity, management, and collateral. Risk ratings, for pass credits, are generally reviewed annually for term debt and at renewal for revolving or renewing debt. The Bank monitors loan quality by reviewing four measurements: (1) loans rated 6 or worse (collectively “watch list”), (2) delinquent loans, (3) other real estate owned (OREO), and (4) net-charge-offs. Management compares trends in these measurements with the Bank’s internally established targets, as well as its national peer group.

Watch list loans exhibit financial weaknesses that increase the potential risk of default or loss to the Bank. However, inclusion on the watch list, does not by itself, mean a loss is certain. The watch list includes both performing and nonperforming loans. Watch list loans totaled $65.1 million at quarter-end compared to $76.3 million at the prior year- end. The watch list is comprised of $18.5 million rated 6 and $46.6 million rated 7. The Bank has no loans rated 8-doubtful or 9-loss.  The credit composition of the portfolio, by primary collateral is shown in Note 7 of the accompanying financial statement. Included in the substandard loan total is $20.6 million of nonaccrual loans. The Bank’s Loan Management Committee reviews these loans and risk ratings on a quarterly basis in order to proactively identify and manage problem loans. In addition, a committee meets monthly to discuss possible workout strategies for OREO and all credits rated 7 or worse. Management also tracks other commercial loan risk measurements including high loan to value loans, concentrations, participations and policy exceptions and reports these to the Credit Risk Oversight Committee of the Board of Directors. The Bank also uses a third-party consultant to assist with internal loan review with a goal of reviewing 60% of commercial loans each year. The FDIC defines certain supervisory loan-to-value lending limits.  The Bank’s internal loan–to-value limits are all equal to, or have a lower loan-to-value limit, than the supervisory limits.  At June 30, 2014, the Bank had loans of $24 .3 million that exceeded the supervisory limit.

Delinquent loans are a result of borrowers’ cash flow and/or alternative sources of cash being insufficient to repay loans.  The Bank’s likelihood of collateral liquidation to repay the loans becomes more probable the further behind a borrower falls, particularly when loans reach 90 days or more past due. Management monitors the performance status of loans by the use of an aging report. The aging report can provide an early indicator of loans that may become severely delinquent and possibly result in a loss to the Bank.  See Note 7 in the accompanying financial statements for a note that presents the aging of payments in the loan portfolio.

Nonaccruing loans generally represent Management’s determination that the borrower will be unable to repay the loan in accordance with its contractual terms and that collateral liquidation may or may not fully repay both interest and principal. It is the Bank’s policy to evaluate the probable collectability of principal and interest due under terms of loan contracts for all loans 90-days or more, nonaccrual loans, or impaired loans. Further, it is the Bank’s policy to discontinue accruing interest on loans that are not adequately secured and in the process of collection.  Upon determination of nonaccrual status, the Bank subtracts any current year accrued and unpaid interest from its income, and any prior year accrued and unpaid interest from the allowance for loan losses.  Management continually monitors the status of nonperforming loans, the value of any collateral and potential of risk of loss.  Nonaccrual loans are rated no better than 7 (Substandard).

41


Loan quality, as measured by the balance of nonperforming loans, is virtually unchanged from year-end. However, the performance ratios related to nonperforming loans ha ve improved since December 31, 2013. The following table presents a summary of nonperforming assets:

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014

December 31, 2013

Nonaccrual loans

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

$

1,275

$

2,599

Junior liens and lines of credit

110

107

Total

1,385

2,706

Residential real estate - construction

525

538

Commercial real estate

16,185

19,001

Commercial

2,543

2,398

Total nonaccrual loans

20,638

24,643

Loans past due 90 days or more and not included above

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

First liens

392

302

Junior liens and lines of credit

11

41

Total

403

343

Commercial real estate

-

207

Commercial

-

44

Consumer

8

10

Total loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing

411

604

Total nonperforming loans

21,049

25,247

Other real estate owned

4,112

4,708

Total nonperforming assets

$

25,161

$

29,955

Nonaccrual loans to total gross loans

2.82%

3.41%

Nonperforming loans to total gross loans

2.87%

3.49%

Nonperforming assets to total assets

2.46%

3.04%

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans

45.22%

38.43%

The following table identifies the most significant loans in nonaccrual status. These seven nonaccrual loans account for 84% of the total nonaccrual balance. The table also indicates those significant non a ccrual loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDR). A TDR loan is maintained on nonaccrual status until a satisfactory repayment history is established.  It is possible that other nonaccrual loans could be removed from nonaccrual status in 2014.  However, it is also possible that other loans may become delinquent and nonperforming loans could remain at a high level due to lengthy workout periods on these loans. All loans on the watch list that are not on nonaccrual or past due 90 days more are considered potential problem loans. Potential problem loans at June 30, 2014 totaled $44. 4 million compared to $51. 6 million at year-end 2013.

42


The following table provides information on the most significant nonaccrual loans as of June 3 0 , 201 4 .

ALL

Nonaccrual

TDR

Last

(Dollars in thousands)

Balance

Reserve

Date

Status

Collateral

Location

Appraisal(1)

Credit 1 - Commercial real estate

$

3,040

$

-

Dec-10

N

1st lien on 92 acres undeveloped commercial real estate

PA

Dec-13

$

3,304

Credit 2 - Residential real estate and commercial real estate

895

-

Aug-11

N

1st lien on commercial and residential properties and 70 acres of farmland

PA

Jun-13

$

1,272

Credit 3 - Residential real estate

2,022

-

Mar-12

Y

1st and 2nd liens on commercial real estate, residential real estate and business assets

PA

Oct-13

$

4,320

Credit 4 - Residential real estate

883

-

Jun-12

N

1st lien residential development land - 75 acres

WV

Oct-13

$

1,250

2nd lien residential real estate

PA

Credit 5 - Commercial real estate

7,264

-

Sep-12

Y

1st lien residential real estate development -379 acres and other commercial and residential properties

PA

Apr-14

$

7,332

Credit 6 - Commercial / commercial real estate

2,489

948

Mar-13

N

Liens on land, commercial and residential real estate and business assets

PA

May-14

$

3,056

Credit 7 - Commercial real estate

811

-

Mar-14

N

1st lien on commercial real estate

PA

Jun-13

$

1,550

$

17,404

$

948

(1) Appraisal value, as reported, does not reflect the pay-off of any senior liens or the cost to liquidate the collateral, but does reflect only the Bank’s share of the collateral if it is a participated loan.

Credit 1 has been charged down by $3.5 million since being placed on nonaccrual due to declining appraisal values.  This credit is part of a participated loan and the lead bank has begun foreclosure action. Credit 2 is in the process of foreclosure and the real estate is listed for sale.  Credit 3 is a TDR that is not performing in accordance with the modified terms. Credit 4 has been written down by $1.6 million since being placed on nonaccrual, including a write-down of $1.2 million in 2013.  Foreclosure has been delayed as the borrower is expected to close on third party financing.  Credit 5 is a TDR and is performing in accordance with its modified terms. The Bank holds real estate collateral, but the loan is not considered collateral dependent for repayment. Credit 6, the borrower and guarantor have filed bankruptcy. Credit 7 is a new nonaccrual loan in 2014 and is performing under a forbearance agreement with the Bank.

In addition to monitoring nonaccrual loans, the Bank also closely monitors impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings (TDR).  A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all interest and principal payments due according to the originally contracted terms of the loan agreement.  Nonaccrual loans and TDR loans are always considered impaired. For impaired loans with balances less than $100 thousand and consumer purpose loans, a specific reserve analysis is not performed and these loans are added to the general allocation pool. In accordance with financial accounting standards, TDR loans are always considered impaired until they are paid off.  However, an impaired TDR loan can be a performing loan. Impaired loans totaled $27.2 million at quarter-end compared to $30.9 million at year-end 2013. Included in the impaired loan total is $16.7 million of TDR loans. Note 7 of the accompanying financial statements provides additional information on the composition of the impaired loans, including the allowance for loan loss that has been established for impaired loans.

A loan is considered a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) if the creditor (the Bank), for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. These concessions may include lowering the rate, extending the maturity, reamortization of the payment, or a combination of multiple concessions.   The Bank reviews all loans rated 6 or worse when it is providing a loan restructure, modification or new credit facility to determine if the action is a TDR.  If a TDR loan is placed on nonaccrual status, it remains on

43


nonaccrual status for at least six months to ensure performance. All TDR loans except one, Credit 3 in the table of significant nonaccrual loans, are in compliance with their modified terms. See Note 7 in the accompanying financial statements for a note that identifies TDR loans in the portfolio.

The Bank holds $4.1 million of other real estate owned (OREO), comprised of eight properties compared to $4.7 million and eight properties at December 31, 2013.  The most significant OREO holdings are listed in the table below. Property 1 was written down by $181 thousand in 2014 and one parcel was sold in July 2014 . The appraised value for Property 2 reflects an “as is” valuation.  A second appraisal that reflects the commercial and industrial development potential of the property, which is the most likely use for the property, was $6.9 million.  The Bank has reported the lower of the two valuations.

During 2014, the Bank has incurred a net loss of $185 thousand on OREO and an expense of $20 thousand to hold and maintain OREO.

The following table provides additional information on significant other real estate owned properties:

June 30, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

Date

Acquired

Balance

Collateral

Location

Last Appraisal

Property 1 (2 properties)

2011

$

831

unimproved and improved real estate for residential development on two tracts

PA

Jan-14

$

970

Property 2

2012

2,758

1st, 2nd, and 3rd liens residential development land - four tracts with 200 acres

PA

Apr-14

$

2,950

$

3,589

At June 3 0 , 2014, the Bank had $ 788 thousand of residential properties in the process of foreclosure compared to $1.1 million at the end of 2013.

Allowance for Loan Losses:

Management performs a monthly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses (ALL). The ALL is determined by segmenting the loan portfolio based on the loan’s collateral. The Bank further classifies the portfolio based on the primary purpose of the loan, either consumer or commercial.  When calculating the ALL, consideration is given to a variety of factors in establishing this estimate including, but not limited to, current economic conditions, diversification of the loan portfolio, delinquency statistics, results of internal loan reviews, historical charge-offs, the adequacy of the underlying collateral (if collateral dependent) and other relevant factors. The Bank begins enhanced monitoring of all loans rated 6 (OAEM) or worse, and obtains a new appraisal or asset valuation for any loan rated 7 (substandard) or worse. Management, at its discretion, may determine that additional adjustments to the appraisal or valuation are required.  Valuation adjustments will be made as necessary based on factors, including, but not limited to: the economy, deferred maintenance, industry, type of property/equipment, age of the appraisal, etc. and the knowledge Management has about a particular situation. In addition, the cost to sell or liquidate the collateral is also estimated and deducted from the valuation in order to determine the net realizable value to the Bank. When determining the allowance for loan losses, certain factors involved in the evaluation are inherently subjective and require material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change, including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans. Management monitors the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on an ongoing basis and reports its adequacy quarterly to the Credit Risk Oversight Committee of the Board of Directors. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2014 is adequate.

The analysis for determining the ALL is consistent with guidance set forth in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and the Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. The analysis has two components, specific and general allocations. The specific component addresses specific reserves established for impaired loans. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all interest and principal payments due according to the originally contracted terms of the loan agreement.  Collateral values discounted for market conditions and selling costs are used to establish specific allocations for impaired loans. It is possible that as a result of the credit analysis, a specific reserve is not required for an impaired loan. For impaired loans with balances less than $100 thousand and consumer purpose loans, a specific reserve analysis is

44


not performed and these loans are added to the general allocation pool.  The specific allowance of $1.0 million is comprised primarily of the allowance established for Credit 6 in the table of significant nonaccrual  loans.  Note 7 in the accompanying financial statements provides additional information about the ALL established for impaired loans.

The general allocation component addresses the reserves established for pools of homogenous loans. The general component includes a quantitative and qualitative analysis. When calculating the general allocation, the Bank segregates its loan portfolio into the following sectors based primarily on the type of supporting collateral:  residential real estate, commercial, industrial or agricultural real estate; commercial and industrial (C&I non-real estate), and consumer.  The residential real estate sector is further segregated by first lien loans, junior liens and home equity products, and residential real estate construction. The quantitative analysis uses the Bank’s eight quarter rolling historical loan loss experience adjusted for factors derived from current economic and market conditions that have been determined to have an effect on the probability and magnitude of a loss.   The historical loss experience factor was .95% of gross loans at June 30, 2014 compared to .99% at December 31, 2013.  The qualitative analysis utilizes a risk matrix that incorporates qualitative and environmental factors such as: loan volume, management, loan review process, credit concentrations, competition, and legal and regulatory issues. These factors are each risk rated from minimal to high risk and in total can add up to a maximum qualitative factor of 37.5 basis points. At quarter-end, this factor was 20.5 basis points unchanged from year-end 2013.  These factors are determined on the basis of Management’s observation, judgment and experience.

Real estate appraisals and collateral valuations are an important part of the Bank’s process for determining potential loss on collateral dependent loans and thereby have a direct effect on the determination of loan reserves, charge-offs and the calculation of the allowance for loan losses.  As long as the loan remains a performing loan, no further updates to appraisals are required. If a loan or relationship migrates to risk rating of 7 or worse, an evaluation for impairment status is made based on the current information available at the time of downgrade and a new appraisal or collateral valuation is obtained.

In determining the allowance for loan losses, Management, at its discretion, may determine that additional adjustments to the fair value obtained from an appraisal or collateral valuation are required. Adjustments will be made as necessary based on factors, including, but not limited to the economy, deferred maintenance, industry, type of property or equipment etc., and the knowledge Management has about a particular situation. In addition, the cost to sell or liquidate the collateral is also estimated and deducted from the valuation in order to determine the net realizable value to the Bank. If an appraisal is not available, Management may make its best estimate of the real value of the collateral or use last known market value and apply appropriate discounts.  If an adjustment is made to the collateral valuation, this will be documented with appropriate support and reported to the Loan Management Committee.

45


The following table shows the loans that were evaluated for the allowance for loan losses under a specific reserve (individually) and those that were evaluated under a general reserve (collectively), and the amount of the allowance established in each loan class as of June 3 0 , 201 4 :

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

Junior Liens &

Commercial

(Dollars in thousands)

First Liens

Lines of Credit

Construction

Real Estate

Commercial

Consumer

Total

June 30, 2014

Loans evaluated for allowance:

Individually

$

1,158

$

51

$

525

$

22,210

$

1,924

$

-

$

25,868

Collectively

160,330

40,020

10,757

300,255

188,206

7,283

706,851

Total

$

161,488

$

40,071

$

11,282

$

322,465

$

190,130

$

7,283

$

732,719

Allowance established for loans evaluated:

Individually

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

68

$

957

$

-

$

1,025

Collectively

1,079

266

261

5,344

1,409

135

8,494

Allowance at June 30, 2014

$

1,079

$

266

$

261

$

5,412

$

2,366

$

135

$

9,519

December 31, 2013

Loans evaluated for allowance:

Individually

$

2,354

$

50

$

537

$

25,107

$

1,996

$

-

$

30,044

Collectively

159,685

40,525

11,982

304,266

168,331

8,580

693,369

Total

$

162,039

$

40,575

$

12,519

$

329,373

$

170,327

$

8,580

$

723,413

Allowance established for loans evaluated:

Individually

$

9

$

-

$

-

$

89

$

1,002

$

-

$

1,100

Collectively

1,099

278

291

5,482

1,304

148

8,602

Allowance at December 31, 2013

$

1,108

$

278

$

291

$

5,571

$

2,306

$

148

$

9,702

During the second quarter of 2014, $266 thousand was added to the allowance for loan losses (ALL) thorough the provision for loan loss expense.  This is a sizable reduction from the provision expense of $803 thousand for the same period in 2013.

Charged-off loans usually result from: (1) a borrower being legally relieved of loan repayment responsibility through bankruptcy, (2) insufficient collateral sale proceeds to repay a loan; or (3) the borrower and/or guarantor does not own other assets that, if sold, would generate sufficient sale proceeds to repay a loan.

The Bank recorded net loan charge-offs of $492 thousand for the second quarter of 2014 and $647 thousand year-to-date. In 2013, net charge-offs were $308 thousand and $546 thousand, for the second quarter and year-to-date period, respectively.

46


The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods ended:

Residential Real Estate 1-4 Family

Junior Liens &

Commercial

(Dollars in thousands)

First Liens

Lines of Credit

Construction

Real Estate

Commercial

Consumer

Total

Allowance at March 31, 2014

$

1,133

$

276

$

374

$

5,509

$

2,309

$

144

$

9,745

Charge-offs

(241)

-

-

(234)

(11)

(37)

(523)

Recoveries

-

-

-

-

13

18

31

Provision

187

(10)

(113)

137

55

10

266

Allowance at June 30, 2014

$

1,079

$

266

$

261

$

5,412

$

2,366

$

135

$

9,519

Allowance at December 31, 2013

$

1,108

$

278

$

291

$

5,571

$

2,306

$

148

$

9,702

Charge-offs

(257)

-

(27)

(348)

(12)

(80)

(724)

Recoveries

3

-

-

-

33

41

77

Provision

225

(12)

(3)

189

39

26

464

Allowance at June 30, 2014

$

1,079

$

266

$

261

$

5,412

$

2,366

$

135

$

9,519

Allowance at December 31, 2012

$

913

$

306

$

899

$

6,450

$

1,620

$

191

$

10,379

Charge-offs

(547)

(45)

-

(2,855)

(363)

(162)

(3,972)

Recoveries

13

-

-

203

100

59

375

Provision

729

17

(608)

1,773

949

60

2,920

Allowance at December 31, 2013

$

1,108

$

278

$

291

$

5,571

$

2,306

$

148

$

9,702

June 30, 2014

December 31, 2013

June 30, 2013

Net loans charged-off as a percentage of average gross loans

0.18%

0.49%

0.15%

Net loans charged-off as a percentage of the provision for loan losses

139.44%

123.18%

34.02%

Allowance as a percentage of loans

1.30%

1.34%

1.57%

Net charge-offs

$

647

$

3,597

$

546

47


Deposits:

Total deposits increased $ 55 . 0 million during the first half of 201 4 to $9 00 . 7 million. Non-interest bearing deposits in creased $ 7 . 7 million, while savings and interest-bearing checking increased $ 55 . 4 million and time deposits de creased $ 8 . 1 million . The in crease in non-inte rest bearing checking accounts occurred primarily in small business checking accounts ($ 3. 7 million) and municipal checking accounts ($ 5 . 3 million). Interest bearing checking increased by $ 33 . 5 million, primarily from commercial deposits. The Bank’s Money Management product increased $ 16 . 9 million due primarily to an increase in commercial deposits.  Retail time deposits decreased since year-end, as customers moved funds to more liquid accounts.  As of June 3 0 , 201 4 , the Bank had $5. 6 million in CDARS reciprocal time deposits included in brokered time deposits.

Change

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014

December 31, 2013

Amount

%

Noninterest-bearing checking

$

129,270

$

121,565

$

7,705

6.3

Interest-bearing checking

213,960

180,450

33,510

18.6

Money management

387,311

370,401

16,910

4.6

Savings

64,356

59,394

4,962

8.4

Total interest-bearing checking and savings

665,627

610,245

55,382

9.1

Retail time deposits

100,188

108,283

(8,095)

(7.5)

Brokered time deposits

5,619

5,631

(12)

(0.2)

Total time deposits

105,807

113,914

(8,107)

(7.1)

Total deposits

$

900,704

$

845,724

$

54,980

6.5

Overdrawn deposit accounts reclassified as loans

$

138

$

106

Borrowings:

The balance of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are accounted for as collateralized financings, decreased $ 21 . 6 million from year-end to $2.3 million .  The Bank is transitioning customers from this product to a deposit sweep product , which provides full FDIC coverage.  This will free-up collateral that was required to cover these balances and will increase the Bank’s liquidity. The long-term debt from the FHLB decreased due to scheduled amortization.

Shareholders’ Equity:

Total shareholders’ equity increased $ 4 . 6 million to $ 100.0 million at June 3 0 , 201 4 , compared to $9 5 . 4 million at the end of 201 3 .  The increase in retained earnings from the Corporation’s net income of $ 4 . 1 million was partially offset by the cash dividend of $ 1.4 million . The Corporation’s dividend payout ratio is 3 4 . 2 % for the first half of 201 4 compared to 4 8 . 1 % in 201 3 .

As part of its quarterly dividend decision, the Corporation considers current and future income projections, dividend yield, payout ratio, and current and future capital ratios. In April 201 4 , the Board of Directors declared a $.17 per share regular quarterly dividend for the second quarter of 201 4 .  This compares to a regular quarterly cash dividend of $. 1 7 paid in the first quarter of 201 3 . On July 24, 2014 the Board of Directors declared a $.17 per share regular quarterly dividend for the third quarter of 2014, which will be paid on August 27, 2014.

In addition, the Corporation considers how dividend decisions may affect the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP), which has raised $ 3 74 thousand in new capital this year with 20 , 642 new shares purchased.  The Corporation continually explores other sources of capital as part of its capital management plan for the Corporation and the Bank.  The Corporation did not repurchase any shares of the Corporation’s common stock during the first six months of 201 4 .

48


Capital adequacy is currently defined by regulatory agencies through the use of several minimum required ratios.  At June 3 0 , 201 4 , the Corporation was well capitalized as defined by the banking regulatory agencies .  Regulatory capital ratios for the Corporation and the Bank are shown below:

Regulatory Ratios

Well Capitalized

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2014

December 31, 2013

Minimum

Minimum

Total Risk-based Capital Ratio

Franklin Financial Services Corporation

14.63%

14.24%

8.00%

N/A

Farmers & Merchants Trust Company

14.17%

13.78%

8.00%

10.00%

Tier 1 Risk-based Capital Ratio

Franklin Financial Services Corporation

13.36%

12.97%

4.00%

N/A

Farmers & Merchants Trust Company

12.91%

12.52%

4.00%

6.00%

Tier 1 Leverage Ratio

Franklin Financial Services Corporation

9.35%

9.14%

4.00%

N/A

Farmers & Merchants Trust Company

8.93%

8.81%

4.00%

5.00%

Economy

The Corporation’s primary market area includes Franklin, Fulton, Cumberland and Huntingdon County, PA.  This area is diverse in demographic and economic makeup.  County populations range from a low of approximately 15,000 in Fulton County to over 2 20 ,000 in Cumberland County. Unemployment in the Bank’s market area has remained virtually unchanged over the past year and ranges from a low of 4 . 6 % in Cumberland County to high of 6 . 9 % in Fulton County.  The market area has a diverse economic base and local industries include, warehousing, truck & rail shipping centers, light and heavy manufacturers, health-care, higher education institutions, farming and agriculture, and a varied service sector.  The Corporation’s primary market area is located in south central Pennsylvania and provides easy access to the major metropolitan markets on the east coast via trucking and rail transportation. Because of this, warehousing and distribution companies continue to find the area attractive. The local economy is not overly dependent on any one industry or business and Management believes that the Bank’s primary market area continues to be well suited for growth as the recession eases.

The following provides selected economic data for the Bank’s primary market:

Economic Data

June 30, 2014

December 31, 2013

Unemployment Rate (seasonally adjusted)

Market area range (1)

4.6% - 6.9%

5.9% - 9.2%

Pennsylvania

5.6%

7.3%

United States

6.1%

6.7%

Housing Price Index - year over year change

PA, nonmetropolitan statistical area

1.1%

1.3%

United States

4.9%

4.6%

Franklin County Building Permits - year over year change

Residential, estimated

19.5%

18.2%

Multifamily, estimated

-24.8%

-68.5%

(1) Franklin, Cumberland, Fulton and Huntingdon Counties

Unlike many companies, the assets and liabilities of the Corporation are financial in nature. As such, interest rates and changes in interest rates may have a more significant effect on the Corporation’s financial results than on other types of industries. Because of this, the Corporation watches the actions of the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee ( FOMC) as it makes decisions about interest rate changes. The FOMC continues to hold short-term rates at historic lows. The FOMC continued its tapering of bond purchases that it began at the end of 2013 and it is expected that the quantitative

49


easing program will end in 2014.  It continues to monitor employment and inflation data as it considers the timing of an increase in the Fed Funds rate.  Many analysts believe that the FOMC will begin to increase rates in 2015.

Liquidity

The Corporation must meet the financial needs of the customers that it serves, while providing a satisfactory return on the shareholders’ investment.  In order to accomplish this, the Corporation must maintain sufficient liquidity in order to respond quickly to the changing level of funds required for both loan and deposit activity.  The goal of liquidity management is to meet the ongoing cash flow requirements of depositors who want to withdraw funds and of borrowers who request loan disbursements. The Bank regularly reviews it liquidity position by measuring its projected net cash flows (in and out) at a 30 and 90-day interval.  The Bank stresses this measurement by assuming a level of deposit out-flows that have not historically been realized. In addition to this forecast, other funding sources are reviewed as a method to provide emergency funding if necessary.  The objective of this measurement is to identify the amount of cash that could be raised quickly without the need to liquidate assets.  The Bank also stresses its liquidity position utilizing different longer-term scenarios.  The varying degrees of stress create pressure on deposit flows in its local market, reduce access to wholesale funding and limit access of funds available through brokered deposit channels. In addition to stressing cash flow, specific liquidity risk indicators are monitored to help identify risk areas.  This analysis will help identify and quantify the potential cash surplus/deficit over a variety of time horizons to ensure the Bank has adequate funding resources.  Assumptions used for liquidity stress testing are subjective.  Should an evolving liquidity situation or business cycle present new data, potential assumption changes will be considered.  The Bank believes it can meet all anticipated liquidity demands.

Historically, the Corporation has satisfied its liquidity needs from earnings, repayment of loans and amortizing investment securities, maturing investment securities, loan` sales, deposit growth and its ability to access existing lines of credit.  All investment securities are classified as available for sale; therefore, securities that are not pledged as collateral for borrowings are an additional source of readily available liquidity, either by selling the security or, more preferably, to provide collateral for additional borrowing. At June 3 0 , 201 4 , the Bank had approximately $ 84 million (fair value) in its investment portfolio pledged as collateral for deposits and Repos.  Another source of available liquidity for the Bank is a line of credit with the FHLB.  At June 3 0 , 201 4 , the Bank had approximately $35 million available on this line of credit and $16 million of unsecured lines of credit at correspondent banks. A t June 3 0 , 201 4 , the Bank had an excess borrowing capacity of $ 2 26.9 million, which includes the amount available on the line of credit.

The Bank has established credit at the Federal Reserve Discount Window and as of quarter-end had the ability to borrow approximately $ 39 million.

Off Balance Sheet Commitments

The Corporation’s financial statements do not reflect various commitments that are made in the normal course of business, which may involve some liquidity risk.  These commitments consist mainly of unfunded loans and letters of credit made under the same standards as on-balance sheet instruments.  Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them will expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk to the Corporation.  Unused commitments and standby letters of credit totaled $2 52 . 5 million and $2 39 . 6 million, respectively, at June 3 0 , 201 4 and December 31, 201 3 .

The Corporation has entered into various contractual obligations to make future payments.  These obligations include time deposits, long-term debt, operating leases, deferred compensation and pension payments.  These amounts have not changed materially from those reported in the Corporation’s 201 3 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

50


Item 3 .  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There were no material changes in the Corporation’s exposure to market risk during the six months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 . For more information on market risk refer to the Corporation’s 201 3 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Pr ocedures

Evaluation of Controls and Procedures

The Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon the evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 3 0 , 201 4 , the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Corporation’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

The management of the Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Corporation’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

51


Part II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The nature of the Corporation’s business generates a certain amount of litigation involving matters arising in the ordinary course of business.  However, in management’s opinion, there are no proceedings pending to which the Corporation is a party or to which our property is subject, which, if determined adversely to the Corporation, would be material in relation to our shareholders’ equity or financial condition.  In addition, no material proceedings are pending or are known to be threatened or contemplated against us by governmental authorities or other parties.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There were no material changes in the Corporation’s risk factors during the six months ended June 3 0 , 201 4 . For more information, refer to the Corporation’s 201 3 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered  Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3. Defaults by the Company on its Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

Item 5. Other In formation

None

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

3.1   Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation.  (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.)

3.2   Bylaws of the Corporation. (Filed as Exhibit 99 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.)

31.1 Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Principal Executive Officer

31.2 Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Principal Financial Officer

32.1 Section 1350 Certifications – Principal Executive Officer

32.2 Section 1350 Certifications – Principal Financial Officer

101 Interactive Data File (XBRL)

FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

and SUBSIDIARIES

52


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Franklin Financial Services Corporation

August 11 , 2014

/s/ William E. Snell, Jr

William E. Snell, Jr.

President and Chief Executive Officer

( Principal Executive )

August 11 , 2014

/s/ Mark R. Hollar

Mark R. Hollar

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

53


TABLE OF CONTENTS