FIRST MERCHANTS CORP
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
_______________________________
FORM 10-K
[Mark One]
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________to_________
Commission file number 0-17071
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Indiana
|
35-1544218
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
200 East Jackson
Muncie, Indiana
|
47305-2814
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (765)747-1500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of Each Class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.125 stated value per share
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer[X] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Small Reporting Company [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No[X]
The aggregate market value (not necessarily a reliable indication of the price at which more than a limited number of shares would trade) of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $229,674,000 as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2011).
As of February 17, 2012 there were 28,896,102 outstanding common shares, without par value, of the registrant.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
Documents
|
Part of Form 10-K into which incorporated
|
|
Portions of the Registrant’s Definitive
|
Part III (Items 10 through 14)
|
|
Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of
|
|
|
Shareholders to be held April 27, 2012
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 21 | ||||||
| 24 | ||||||
| 25 | ||||||
| 25 | ||||||
| 25 | ||||||
| 26 | ||||||
| 27 | ||||||
| 29 | ||||||
| 30 | ||||||
| 43 | ||||||
| 44 | ||||||
| 88 | ||||||
| 88 | ||||||
| 89 | ||||||
| 90 | ||||||
| 90 | ||||||
| 90 | ||||||
| 90 | ||||||
| 90 | ||||||
| 91 | ||||||
2
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operations
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Interest Income Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE) Basis
|
$
|
149,114
|
$
|
149,434
|
$
|
159,068
|
$
|
133,083
|
$
|
117,247
|
||||||||||
|
Less Tax Equivalent Adjustment
|
5,759
|
5,865
|
5,722
|
3,699
|
4,127
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net Interest Income
|
143,355
|
143,569
|
153,346
|
129,384
|
113,120
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Provision for Loan Losses
|
22,630
|
46,483
|
122,176
|
28,238
|
8,507
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses
|
120,725
|
97,086
|
31,170
|
101,146
|
104,613
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Other Income
|
49,120
|
48,544
|
51,201
|
36,367
|
40,551
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Other Expenses
|
135,938
|
142,311
|
151,558
|
108,792
|
102,182
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
|
33,907
|
3,319
|
(69,187
|
)
|
28,721
|
42,982
|
||||||||||||||
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
|
8,655
|
(3,590
|
)
|
(28,424
|
)
|
8,083
|
11,343
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
25,252
|
6,909
|
(40,763
|
)
|
20,638
|
31,639
|
||||||||||||||
|
Gain on Exchange of Preferred Stock to Trust Preferred Debt
|
11,353
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Loss on CPP Unamortized Discount
|
(1,401
|
)
|
(1,301
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Loss on Extinguishment of Trust Preferred Securities
|
(10,857
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Stock Dividends and Discount Accretion
|
(3,981
|
)
|
(5,239
|
)
|
(4,979
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders
|
$
|
9,013
|
$
|
11,722
|
$
|
(45,742
|
)
|
$
|
20,638
|
$
|
31,639
|
|||||||||
|
Per Share Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.48
|
$
|
(2.17
|
)
|
$
|
1.14
|
$
|
1.73
|
|||||||||
|
Diluted Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders
|
0.34
|
0.48
|
(2.17
|
)
|
1.14
|
1.73
|
||||||||||||||
|
Cash Dividends Paid - Common
|
0.04
|
0.04
|
0.47
|
0.92
|
0.92
|
|||||||||||||||
|
December 31 Book Value - Common
|
14.83
|
15.11
|
16.55
|
18.69
|
18.88
|
|||||||||||||||
|
December 31 Tangible Book Value - Common
|
9.64
|
9.21
|
9.25
|
10.93
|
11.60
|
|||||||||||||||
|
December 31 Market Value (Bid Price) - Common
|
8.47
|
8.86
|
5.94
|
22.21
|
27.84
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Average Balances
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
4,143,850
|
$
|
4,271,715
|
$
|
4,674,590
|
$
|
3,811,166
|
$
|
3,639,772
|
||||||||||
|
Total Loans
(2)
|
2,748,684
|
3,050,850
|
3,546,316
|
3,002,628
|
2,794,824
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Deposits
|
3,175,762
|
3,337,747
|
3,603,509
|
2,902,902
|
2,752,443
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements (long-term portion)
|
12,773
|
24,250
|
24,250
|
34,250
|
23,813
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
|
110,729
|
107,753
|
243,105
|
237,791
|
259,463
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Subordinated Debentures, Revolving Credit Lines and Term Loans
|
133,673
|
126,650
|
110,826
|
107,752
|
104,680
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
478,440
|
470,379
|
477,148
|
349,594
|
330,786
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Year-End Balances
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
4,173,076
|
$
|
4,170,848
|
$
|
4,480,952
|
$
|
4,784,155
|
$
|
3,782,087
|
||||||||||
|
Total Loans
(2)
|
2,731,279
|
2,857,152
|
3,277,824
|
3,726,247
|
2,880,578
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Deposits
|
3,134,655
|
3,268,880
|
3,536,536
|
3,718,811
|
2,884,121
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements (long-term portion)
|
10,000
|
24,250
|
24,250
|
34,250
|
34,250
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
|
138,095
|
82,684
|
129,749
|
360,217
|
294,101
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Subordinated Debentures, Revolving Credit Lines and Term Loans
|
194,974
|
226,440
|
194,790
|
135,826
|
115,826
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
514,467
|
454,408
|
463,785
|
395,903
|
339,936
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Financial Ratios
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Return on Average Assets
|
0.22
|
%
|
0.27
|
%
|
-0.98
|
%
|
0.54
|
%
|
0.87
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Return on Average Stockholders' Equity
|
1.88
|
2.49
|
(9.59
|
)
|
5.90
|
9.56
|
||||||||||||||
|
Average Earning Assets to Total Assets
|
90.35
|
90.42
|
94.74
|
72.39
|
90.15
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for Loan Losses as % of Total Loans
|
2.60
|
2.90
|
2.81
|
1.33
|
0.98
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Dividend Payout Ratio
|
11.76
|
8.33
|
n/m
|
(3)
|
80.70
|
53.18
|
||||||||||||||
|
Average Stockholders' Equity to Average Assets
|
11.55
|
11.01
|
10.21
|
9.17
|
9.09
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Tax Equivalent Yield on Earning Assets
|
4.99
|
5.32
|
5.56
|
6.44
|
7.10
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Cost of Supporting Liabilities
|
1.01
|
1.45
|
1.82
|
2.60
|
3.55
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net Interest Margin on Earning Assets
|
3.98
|
3.87
|
3.74
|
3.84
|
3.55
|
|||||||||||||||
_______________________________
(1) On December 31, 2008, the Corporation acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of Lincoln Bancorp, the holding company of Lincoln Bank, which was headquartered in Plainfield, Indiana. Lincoln Bank was a state chartered bank with branches in central Indiana. Lincoln Bancorp was merged into the Corporation and in 2009, Lincoln Bank was ultimately merged into First Merchants Bank, National Association, a subsidiary of the Corporation. The Corporation issued approximately 3,040,415 shares of its common stock at a cost of $19.78 per share and approximately $16.8 million in cash to complete the transaction. As a result of the acquisition, the Corporation increased its customer base and market share. The purchase had a recorded acquisition price of $77,290,000, including investments of $122,093,000; loans of $628,277,000, premises and equipment of $15,624,000; other assets of $86,091,000; deposits of $655,370,000; other liabilities of $136,280,000 and goodwill of $19,813,000. Additionally, core deposit intangibles totaling $12,461,000 were recognized and are amortizing over ten years. The combination was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. All assets and liabilities were recorded at their fair values as of December 31, 2008. The purchase accounting adjustments are being amortized over the life of the respective asset or liability.
(2) Includes loans held for sale.
(3) Not meaningful.
3
First Merchants Corporation (the “Corporation”) from time to time includes forward-looking statements in its oral and written communication. The Corporation may include forward-looking statements in filings with The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), such as Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, in other written materials and oral statements made by senior management to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others. The Corporation intends these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and the Corporation is including this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by the use of words like “believe”, “continue”, “pattern”, “estimate”, “project”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “expect” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “would”, “should”, “could”, “might”, “can”, “may” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include:
|
|
●
|
statements of the Corporation’s goals, intentions and expectations;
|
|
|
●
|
statements regarding the Corporation’s business plan and growth strategies;
|
|
|
●
|
statements regarding the asset quality of the Corporation’s loan and investment portfolios; and
|
|
|
●
|
estimates of the Corporation’s risks and future costs and benefits.
|
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including, among other things, those discussed in Item 1A, “RISK FACTORS”.
Because of these and other uncertainties, the Corporation’s actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, the Corporation’s past results of operations do not necessarily indicate its future results.
4
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
First Merchants Corporation (the “Corporation”) is a financial holding company headquartered in Muncie, Indiana and was organized in September 1982. The Corporation’s Common Stock is traded on NASDAQ’s Global Select Market System under the symbol FRME. The Corporation has one full-service bank charter, First Merchants Bank, National Association (the “Bank”), which opened for business in Muncie, Indiana, in March 1893. The Bank also operates Lafayette Bank and Trust, Commerce National Bank and First Merchants Trust Company as divisions of First Merchants Bank, N.A. The Bank includes seventy-eight banking locations in twenty-three Indiana and two Ohio counties. In addition to its branch network, the Corporation’s delivery channels include ATMs, check cards, remote deposit capture, interactive voice response systems and internet technology. The Corporation’s business activities are currently limited to one significant business segment, which is community banking.
Through the Bank, the Corporation offers a broad range of financial services, including accepting time deposits, savings and demand deposits; making consumer, commercial, agri-business and real estate mortgage loans; renting safe deposit facilities; providing personal and corporate trust services; providing full-service brokerage; and providing other corporate services, letters of credit and repurchase agreements.
The Corporation also operates First Merchants Insurance Services, Inc., operating as First Merchants Insurance Group, a full-service property, casualty, personal lines, and employee benefit insurance agency headquartered in Muncie, Indiana.
The Corporation had operated First Merchants Reinsurance Co. Ltd. (“FMRC”), a small life reinsurance company whose primary business included short-duration credit life, accidental/health insurance and debt cancellation contracts. This company was dissolved in December of 2011. There is no remaining exposure for the Corporation.
All inter-company transactions are eliminated during the preparation of consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2011, the Corporation had consolidated assets of $4.2 billion, consolidated deposits of $3.1 billion and stockholders’ equity of $514 million. As of December 31, 2011, the Corporation and its subsidiaries had 1,144 full-time equivalent employees.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Corporation makes its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, available on its website at www.firstmerchants.com
without charge, as soon as reasonably practicable, after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents can also be read and copied at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. SEC filings are also available to the public at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.
Additionally, the Corporation will also provide without charge, a copy of its Annual Report on Form 10-K to any shareholder by mail. Requests should be sent to Cynthia Holaday, Shareholder Relations, First Merchants Corporation, P.O. Box 792, Muncie, IN 47308-0792.
ACQUISITION POLICY
The Corporation anticipates that it will continue its policy of geographic expansion of its banking business through the acquisition of banks whose operations are consistent with its banking philosophy. Management routinely explores opportunities to acquire financial institutions and other financial services-related businesses and to enter into strategic alliances to expand the scope of its services and its customer base.
COMPETITION
The Bank is located in Indiana and Ohio counties where other financial services companies provide similar banking services. In addition to the competition provided by the lending and deposit gathering subsidiaries of national manufacturers, retailers, insurance companies and investment brokers, the Bank competes vigorously with other banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and finance companies located within their service areas.
5
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OF FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
BANK HOLDING COMPANY REGULATION
The Corporation is registered as a bank holding company and has elected to be a financial holding company. It is subject to the supervision of, and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “BHC Act”), as amended. Bank holding companies are required to file periodic reports with and are subject to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve has issued regulations under the BHC Act requiring a bank holding company to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to the Bank. Thus, it is the policy of the Federal Reserve that a bank holding company should stand ready to use its resources to provide adequate capital funds to the Bank during periods of financial stress or adversity. Additionally, under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), a bank holding company is required to guarantee the compliance of any subsidiary bank that may become “undercapitalized” (as defined in the FDICIA section of this Form 10-K) with the terms of any capital restoration plan filed by such subsidiary with its appropriate federal banking agency. Under the BHC Act, the Federal Reserve has the authority to require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or relinquish control of a non-bank subsidiary (other than a non-bank subsidiary of a bank) upon the determination that such activity constitutes a serious risk to the financial stability of any bank subsidiary.
The BHC Act requires the Corporation to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before:
|
●
|
acquiring direct or indirect control or ownership of any voting shares of any bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, the bank holding company will directly or indirectly own or control more than 5 percent of the voting shares of the bank or bank holding company;
|
|
|
●
|
merging or consolidating with another bank holding company; or
|
|
|
●
|
acquiring substantially all of the assets of any bank.
|
The BHC Act generally prohibits bank holding companies that have not become financial holding companies from (i) engaging in activities other than banking or managing or controlling banks or other permissible subsidiaries, and (ii) acquiring or retaining direct or indirect control of any company engaged in the activities other than those activities determined by the Federal Reserve to be closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks.
CAPITAL ADEQUACY GUIDELINES FOR BANK HOLDING COMPANIES
The BHC Act does not place territorial restrictions on such non-banking related activities. The Corporation is required to comply with the Federal Reserve’s risk-based capital guidelines. These guidelines require a minimum ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets of 8 percent (including certain off-balance sheet activities such as standby letters of credit). At least half of the total required capital must be “Tier 1 capital,” consisting principally of stockholders’ equity, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority interest in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less certain goodwill items. The remainder may consist of a limited amount of subordinate debt and intermediate-term preferred stock, certain hybrid capital instruments and other debt securities, cumulative perpetual preferred stock, and a limited amount of the general loan loss allowance.
In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the Federal Reserve has adopted a Tier 1 (leverage) capital ratio under which the Corporation must maintain a minimum level of Tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets. The ratio is 3 percent in the case of bank holding companies, which have the highest regulatory examination ratings and are not contemplating significant growth or expansion.
The following are the Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios as of December 31, 2011:
|
Corporation
|
Regulatory Minimum Requirement
|
|||||||
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
|
13.92
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
||||
|
Total risk-based capital ratio
|
16.54
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
||||
BANK REGULATION
The Bank is supervised, regulated and examined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”). The OCC has the authority to issue cease-and-desist orders if it determines that activities of the Bank regularly represent an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a violation of law. Federal law extensively regulates various aspects of the banking business such as reserve requirements, truth-in-lending and truth-in-savings disclosures, equal credit opportunity, fair credit reporting, trading in securities and other aspects of banking operations. Current federal law also requires banks, among other things, to make deposited funds available within specified time periods.
BANK CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The OCC has adopted risk-based capital ratio guidelines to which national banks are subject. The guidelines establish a framework that makes regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles. Risk-based capital ratios are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance sheet commitments to four risk-weighted categories, with higher levels of capital being required for the categories perceived as representing greater risk.
6
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OF FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES continued
BANK CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS continued
Like the capital guidelines established by the Federal Reserve, these guidelines divide a bank’s capital into tiers. Banks are required to maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 8 percent. The OCC may, however, set higher capital requirements when a bank’s particular circumstances warrant. Banks experiencing or anticipating significant growth are expected to maintain capital ratios, including tangible capital positions, well above the minimum levels.
In addition, the OCC established guidelines prescribing a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets as specified in the guidelines). These guidelines provide for a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 3 percent for banks that meet specified criteria, including that they have the highest regulatory rating and are not experiencing or anticipating significant growth. All other banks are required to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 3 percent plus an additional 1 to 2 percent.
The Bank exceeded the minimum risk-based capital guidelines of the OCC as of December 31, 2011.
FDIC IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991
The FDICIA requires, among other things, federal bank regulatory authorities to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to banks, which do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, FDICIA establishes five capital tiers: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action provisions of FDICIA.
“Undercapitalized” banks are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. A bank’s compliance with such plan is required to be guaranteed by the bank’s parent holding company. If an “undercapitalized” bank fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized. “Significantly undercapitalized” banks are subject to one or more restrictions, including an order by the FDIC to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets and cease receipt of deposits from correspondent banks, and restrictions on compensation of executive officers. “Critically undercapitalized” institutions may not, beginning 60 days after becoming “critically undercapitalized,” make any payment of principal or interest on certain subordinated debt or extend credit for a highly leveraged transaction or enter into any transaction outside the ordinary course of business. In addition, “critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator.
As of December 31, 2011, the Bank was “well capitalized” based on the “prompt corrective action” ratios described above. It should be noted that a bank’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying the OCC’s “prompt corrective action” regulations and that the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the bank’s overall financial condition or prospects.
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISES
Troubled Asset Relief Program; Capital Purchase Program
Congress, The United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) and the federal banking regulators, including the FDIC, have taken broad action since early September 2008 to address volatility in the U.S. banking system and financial markets.
In October 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) was enacted. The EESA authorized the Treasury to purchase from financial institutions and their holding companies up to $700 billion in mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities and certain other financial instruments, including debt and equity securities issued by financial institutions and their holding companies in a Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”). The purpose of TARP was to restore confidence and stability to the U.S. banking system and to encourage financial institutions to increase their lending to customers and to each other. The Treasury allocated $250 billion towards the TARP Capital Purchase Program. Under the TARP Capital Purchase Program, the Treasury purchased debt or equity securities from participating institutions. TARP also included direct purchases or guarantees of troubled assets of financial institutions. Participants in the TARP Capital Purchase Program are subject to executive compensation limits and are encouraged to expand their lending and mortgage loan modifications.
On February 20, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Letter Agreement (Purchase Agreement) with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Corporation sold (a) 116,000 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) and (b) a warrant to purchase 991,453 shares of the Corporation’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $116 million in cash (“Warrant”).
The Preferred Stock qualified as Tier I capital and was to pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5 percent per annum for the first five years and 9 percent per annum thereafter. The Series A Preferred Stock was non-voting except with respect to certain matters affecting the rights of the holders thereof, and was redeemable by the Corporation after three years. The Warrant had a ten year term and was immediately exercisable with an exercise price of $17.55 per share of common stock. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Treasury had agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the Warrant.
7
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISES continued
Troubled Asset Relief Program; Capital Purchase Program continued
On June 30, 2010, the Corporation entered into an Exchange Agreement with the Treasury whereby the Treasury exchanged 46,400 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock for 46,400 shares of trust preferred securities, having a liquidation amount of $1,000 per share (the “Capital Securities”) issued by the Corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary trust, First Merchants Capital Trust III, a Delaware Statutory Trust (the “Trust”). The Trust simultaneously issued 1,435 shares of the Trust’s common securities (the “Common Securities”) to the Corporation for the purchase price of $1.4 million which constituted all of the issued and outstanding common securities of the Trust. The Trust used the tendered Series A Preferred Stock and the proceeds from the sale of the Common Securities to purchase $47.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Fixed Rate Perpetual Junior Subordinated Debentures, Series A issued by the Corporation (the “Debentures”). The Capital Securities and the Debentures bore interest, payable quarterly, at a rate of 5 percent until February 20, 2014 when the rate would increase to 9 percent. The Capital Securities and Debentures were redeemable by the Corporation upon proper notice and regulatory approval (a) at any time, so long as the Capital Securities were held by the Treasury and (b) at any time after June 30, 2015, if the Capital Securities were held by a person or entity other than the Treasury. The 46,400 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, purchased from the Treasury were cancelled. Following the exchange, the Treasury continued to hold 69,600 shares of Series A Preferred Stock along with the Warrant to initially purchase up to 991,453 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. This particular exchange resulted in a gain on retirement of Preferred Stock and favorably impacted retained earnings by $10.1 million (net of deferred taxes), which was also considered as part of earnings available to common stockholders in the earnings per common share (“EPS”) computations.
On September 22, 2011, the Corporation entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Corporation issued 90,782.94 shares of the Corporation’s Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), having a liquidation amount per share equal to $1,000, for a total purchase price of $90,782,940. The Purchase Agreement was entered into, and the Series B Preferred Stock was issued, pursuant to the Small Business Lending Fund (“SBLF”) program, a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, that encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion.
The Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, beginning October 1, 2011. The Purchase Agreement defines the dividend rate as a percentage of the liquidation amount, and can fluctuate on a quarterly basis during the first ten quarters during which the Series B Preferred Stock is outstanding, based upon changes in the level of Qualified Small Business Lending (“QSBL”) by the Bank. Based upon the Bank’s level of QSBL over the baseline level calculated under the terms of the Purchase Agreement (the “Baseline”), the dividend rate for the initial dividend period has been set at 5 percent. For the second through tenth dividend periods, the dividend rate may be adjusted to between 1 percent and 5 percent per annum, to reflect the amount of change in the Bank’s level of QSBL. In addition to the dividend, in the event the Bank’s level of QSBL has not increased relative to the Baseline, at the beginning of the tenth calendar quarter, the Corporation will be subject to an additional lending incentive fee equal to 2 percent per annum. For the eleventh dividend period through the eighteenth dividend period, inclusive, and that portion of the nineteenth dividend period before, but not including, the four and one half year anniversary of the date of issuance, the dividend rate will be fixed at between 1 percent and 7 percent per annum based upon the increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline. After four and one half years from issuance, the dividend rate will increase to 9 percent.
The Series B Preferred Stock is non-voting, except in limited circumstances. In the event that the Corporation misses five dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock will have the right, but not the obligation, to appoint a representative as an observer on the Corporation’s Board of Directors. In the event that the Corporation misses six dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, and if the then outstanding aggregate liquidation amount of the Series B Preferred Stock is at least $25,000,000, then the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock will have the right to designate two directors to the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
The Series B Preferred Stock may be redeemed at any time at the Corporation’s option, at a redemption price of 100 percent of the liquidation amount plus accrued but unpaid dividends to the date of redemption for the current period, subject to the approval of its federal banking regulator.
The Series B Preferred Stock was issued in a private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Corporation has agreed to register the Series B Preferred Stock under certain circumstances set forth in Annex E to the Purchase Agreement. The Series B Preferred Stock is not subject to any contractual restrictions on transfer.
Also on September 22, 2011, the Corporation entered into and consummated two letter agreements (each, a “Repurchase Letter”) with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Corporation redeemed, out of the proceeds of the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock in the amount of $90,782,940 and cash of $25,813,171 (of which $21,165,000 was raised through a private placement of the Corporation’s common stock on September 9, 2011) for an aggregate redemption price of $116,596,111, including accrued but unpaid dividends to the date of redemption: (i) the remaining 69,600 shares of the Corporation’s Series A Preferred Stock, and (ii) all 46,400 Capital Securities held by the Treasury .
The foregoing summary of the terms of the Repurchase Letters is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the Repurchase Letters.
On November 23, 2011, the Corporation also repurchased the Warrant to purchase 991,453 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $17.55 per share with an expiration date of February 20, 2019 held by the Treasury. The Corporation was the successful bidder in a private auction for the Warrant conducted by the Treasury with a winning bid of $367,500.
8
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISES continued
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) into law. The Dodd-Frank Act is likely to have a broad impact on the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance changes. Many of the requirements called for in the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented over time and most will be subject to various federal agencies implementing regulations over the course of several years. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented by the various regulatory agencies through regulatory guidance, the full extent of the impact such requirements will have on the financial services industry, and on operations specifically, is currently unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may materially impact the profitability of the Corporation’s business activities, require changes to certain business practices, impose more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage requirements or otherwise adversely affect the business. At a minimum, the Dodd-Frank Act is likely to:
|
|
●
|
increase the cost of operations due to greater regulatory oversight, supervision and examination of banks and bank holding companies, including higher deposit insurance premiums;
|
|
|
●
|
limit the Corporation’s ability to raise additional capital through the use of trust preferred securities as new issuances of these securities may no longer be included as Tier 1 capital;
|
|
|
●
|
reduce the flexibility to generate or originate certain revenue-producing assets based on increased regulatory capital standards; and
|
|
|
●
|
limit the ability to expand consumer product and service offerings due to anticipated stricter consumer protection laws and regulations.
|
The timing and extent of these increases and limitations will remain unclear until the underlying implementing regulations are promulgated by the applicable federal agencies. In the interim, the Corporation’s management is currently taking steps to best prepare for the implementation and to minimize the adverse impact on the business, financial condition and results of operation.
On February 7, 2011, the FDIC adopted final rules implementing a portion of the Dodd-Frank Act relating to deposit insurance assessments. The rules modify the base amount for a financial institution’s insurance assessments from an institution’s insured deposits to the difference between an institution’s daily average consolidated assets and its daily average tangible equity. The rules also eliminated the requirement that the FDIC provide rebates to institutions on their deposit premiums once the reserve ratio exceeded 1.5 percent. These new rules became effective on April 1, 2011.
Deposit Insurance
The Bank is insured up to regulatory limits by the FDIC; and, accordingly, is subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund administered by the FDIC. The FDIC has adopted regulations establishing a permanent risk-related deposit insurance assessment system. Under this system, the FDIC places each insured bank in one of four risk categories based on (i) the bank’s capital evaluation, and (ii) supervisory evaluations provided to the FDIC by the bank’s primary federal regulator. Each insured bank’s annual assessment rate is then determined by the risk category in which it is classified by the FDIC.
When Dodd-Frank became effective, it permanently raised the previous Standard Maximum Deposit Insurance Amount (“SMDIA") to $250,000. The FDIC insurance coverage limit applies per depositor, per insured depository institution for each account ownership category. This provision became effective for depositors December 31, 2010.
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
Following a systemic risk determination, on October 14, 2008, the FDIC established the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”). The TLGP includes the Transaction Account Guarantee Program (“TAGP”), which provides unlimited deposit insurance coverage for noninterest-bearing transaction accounts (typically business checking accounts) and certain funds swept into noninterest-bearing savings accounts. Prior to December 31, 2009, institutions participating in the TAGP paid a 10 basis points fee (annualized) on the balance of each covered account in excess of $250,000, while the extra deposit insurance is in place. After December 31, 2009, those institutions that have not opted out of the TAGP extension will be charged an assessment rate ranging from 15 to 25 basis points, depending on the institution’s risk category. This program was extended to December 31, 2010 and the Bank continued its participation until the program expired on December 31, 2010, when the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act became effective which, in part, permanently raised the previous SMDIA to $250,000.
The TLGP also included the Debt Guarantee Program (“DGP”), under which the FDIC guaranteed certain senior unsecured debt of FDIC-insured institutions and their holding companies. The guarantee is effective through the earlier of the maturity date or June 30, 2012. Depending on the term of the debt maturity, the nonrefundable DGP fee ranges from 50 to 100 basis points (annualized) for covered debt outstanding until the earlier of maturity or June 30, 2012. The TAGP and the DGP are in effect for all eligible entities, unless the entity opted out on or before December 5, 2008. On March 17, 2009, the FDIC extended the DGP to June 30, 2009 from the original expiration date of April 30, 2009. In addition, beginning in the second quarter of 2009, the FDIC determined to impose a surcharge on debt issued under the DGP with a maturity of one-year or more.
On March 31, 2009, the Bank completed the issuance and sale of an aggregate of $79,000,000 of 2.625 percent Senior Notes (the "Notes") due March 30, 2012 through a pooled offering under the DGP. Including the FDIC fee, underwriting, legal and accounting expenses the effective rate is 3.812 percent. The Notes are issued by the Bank and are not obligations of, or guaranteed by, the Corporation. In connection with the terms of the TLGP, the Bank entered into a Master Agreement with the FDIC on January 16, 2009. The Master Agreement contains, among other things, certain terms and conditions that must be included in the governing documents for any senior debt securities issued by the Bank that are guaranteed pursuant to the FDIC’s TLGP.
9
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISES continued
DIVIDEND LIMITATIONS
National banking laws restrict the amount of dividends that an affiliate bank may declare in a year without obtaining prior regulatory approval. National banks are limited to the bank’s retained net income (as defined) for the current year plus those for the previous two years. At December 31, 2011, the Corporation’s affiliates (including the Bank and other affiliates) had a total of $14,225,000 retained net profits available for 2012 dividends to the Corporation without prior regulatory approval.
BROKERED DEPOSITS
Under FDIC regulations, no FDIC-insured depository institution can accept brokered deposits unless it (i) is well capitalized, or (ii) is adequately capitalized and received a waiver from the FDIC. In addition, these regulations prohibit any depository institution that is not well capitalized from (a) paying an interest rate on deposits in excess of 76 basis points over certain prevailing market rates or (b) offering “pass through” deposit insurance on certain employee benefit plan accounts unless it provides certain notice to affected depositors.
INTERSTATE BANKING AND BRANCHING
Under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (“Riegle-Neal”), subject to certain concentration limits, required regulatory approvals and other requirements, (i) financial holding companies such as the Corporation are permitted to acquire banks and bank holding companies located in any state; (ii) any bank that is a subsidiary of a bank holding company is permitted to receive deposits, renew time deposits, close loans, service loans and receive loan payments as an agent for any other bank subsidiary of that holding company; and (iii) banks are permitted to acquire branch offices outside their home states by merging with out-of-state banks, purchasing branches in other states, and establishing de novo branch offices in other states.
FINANCIAL SERVICES MODERNIZATION ACT
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the “Financial Services Modernization Act”) establishes a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial service providers by revising and expanding the existing BHC Act. Under this legislation, bank holding companies would be permitted to conduct essentially unlimited securities and insurance activities as well as other activities determined by the Federal Reserve Board to be financial in nature or related to financial services. As a result, the Corporation is able to provide securities and insurance services. Furthermore, under this legislation, the Corporation is able to acquire, or be acquired, by brokerage and securities firms and insurance underwriters. In addition, the Financial Services Modernization Act broadens the activities that may be conducted by national banks through the formation of financial subsidiaries. Finally, the Financial Services Modernization
Act modifies the laws governing the implementation of the Community Reinvestment Act and addresses a variety of other legal and regulatory issues affecting both day-to-day operations and long-term activities of financial institutions.
A bank holding company may become a financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized, is well managed and has at least a satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act, by filing a declaration that the bank holding company wishes to become a financial holding company. Also effective March 11, 2000, no regulatory approval is required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago approved the Corporation’s application to become a Financial Holding Company effective September 13, 2000.
USA PATRIOT ACT
As part of the USA Patriot Act, signed into law on October 26, 2001, Congress adopted the International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Act”). The Act authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other government agencies, to adopt special measures applicable to financial institutions such as banks, bank holding companies, broker-dealers and insurance companies. Among its other provisions, the Act requires each financial institution: (i) to establish an anti-money laundering program; (ii) to establish due diligence policies, procedures and controls that are reasonably designed to detect and report instances of money laundering in United States private banking accounts and correspondent accounts maintained for non-United States persons or their representatives; and (iii) to avoid establishing, maintaining, administering, or managing correspondent accounts in the United States for, or on behalf of, a foreign shell bank that does not have a physical presence in any country. In addition, the Act expands the circumstances under which funds in a bank account may be forfeited and requires covered financial institutions to respond under certain circumstances to requests for information from federal banking agencies within 120 hours.
Treasury regulations implementing the due diligence requirements were issued in 2002. These regulations required minimum standards to verify customer identity, encouraged cooperation among financial institutions, federal banking agencies, and law enforcement authorities regarding possible money laundering or terrorist activities, prohibited the anonymous use of “concentration accounts,” and required all covered financial institutions to have in place an anti-money laundering compliance program.
The Act also amended the Bank Holding Company Act and the Bank Merger Act to require the federal banking agencies to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s anti-money laundering activities when reviewing an application under these acts.
10
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISES continued
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), which became law on July 30, 2002, added new legal requirements for public companies affecting corporate governance, accounting and corporate reporting. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides for, among other things:
|
|
●
|
a prohibition on personal loans made or arranged by the issuer to its directors and executive officers (except for loans made by a bank subject to Regulation O);
|
|
|
●
|
independence requirements for audit committee members;
|
|
|
●
|
independence requirements for company auditors;
|
|
|
●
|
certification of financial statements on Forms 10-K and 10-Q reports by the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer;
|
|
|
●
|
the forfeiture by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of bonuses or other incentive-based compensation and profits from the sale of an issuer’s securities by such officers in the twelve-month period following initial publication of any financial statements that later require restatement due to corporate misconduct;
|
|
|
●
|
disclosure of off-balance sheet transactions;
|
|
|
●
|
two-business day filing requirements for insiders filing Form 4s;
|
|
|
●
|
disclosure of a code of ethics for financial officers and filing a Form 8-K for a change in or waiver of such code;
|
|
|
●
|
the reporting of securities violations “up the ladder” by both in-house and outside attorneys;
|
|
|
●
|
restrictions on the use of non-GAAP financial measures in press releases and SEC filings;
|
|
|
●
|
the formation of a public accounting oversight board; and
|
|
|
●
|
various increased criminal penalties for violations of securities laws.
|
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains provisions, which became effective upon enactment on July 30, 2002, including provisions, which became effective from within 30 days to one year from enactment. The SEC has been delegated the task of enacting rules to implement various provisions. In addition, each of the national stock exchanges developed new corporate governance rules, including rules strengthening director independence requirements for boards, the adoption of corporate governance codes and charters for the nominating, corporate governance and audit committees.
ADDITIONAL MATTERS
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to the Federal Reserve Act, which restricts financial transactions between banks and affiliated companies. The statute limits credit transactions between banks, affiliated companies and its executive officers and its affiliates. The statute prescribes terms and conditions for bank affiliate transactions deemed to be consistent with safe and sound banking practices. It also restricts the types of collateral security permitted in connection with the bank’s extension of credit to an affiliate. Additionally, all transactions with an affiliate must be on terms substantially the same or at least as favorable to the institution as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated parties.
In addition to the matters discussed above, the Bank is subject to additional regulation of its activities, including a variety of consumer protection regulations affecting its lending, deposit and collection activities and regulations affecting secondary mortgage market activities.
The earnings of financial institutions are also affected by general economic conditions and prevailing interest rates, both domestic and foreign, and by the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States Government and its various agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve regulates the supply of credit in order to influence general economic conditions, primarily through open market operations in United States Government obligations, varying the discount rate on financial institution borrowings, varying reserve requirements against financial institution deposits, and restricting certain borrowings by financial institutions and their subsidiaries. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on the operating results of the Bank in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.
Additional legislation and administrative actions affecting the banking industry may be considered by the United States Congress, state legislatures and various regulatory agencies, including those referred to above. It cannot be predicted with certainty whether such legislation or administrative action will be enacted or the extent to which the banking industry, the Corporation or the Bank would be affected.
For example, during the fourth quarter of 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 (“H.R. 4173”). As adopted, H.R. 4173 would potentially impact many aspects of the Corporation’s structure and operations. Examples of some of the changes proposed in the H.R. 4173 include (i) amendments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to establish deposit assessments on total assets less tangible equity, rather than total deposits; (ii) provisions providing shareholders of public companies to have a non-binding “say on pay” vote; and (iii) the creation of a new federal regulator, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, with enforcement authority for many of the consumer protection aspects of current statutes and regulations. The Corporation cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed regulation or statute will be adopted or the extent to which the business may be affected by any new regulation or statute.
11
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
STATISTICAL DATA
The following tables set forth statistical data on the Corporation and its subsidiaries.
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
The daily average balance sheet amounts, the related interest income or interest expense, and average rates earned or paid are presented in the following table:
|
Average Balance
|
Interest
Income /
Expense
|
Average
Rate
|
Average Balance
|
Interest
Income /
Expense
|
Average
Rate
|
Average Balance
|
Interest
Income /
Expense
|
Average
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
$
|
3,270
|
$
|
3
|
0.1
|
%
|
$
|
21,524
|
$
|
26
|
0.1
|
%
|
$
|
78,641
|
$
|
118
|
0.2
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest-bearing Deposits
|
69,030
|
282
|
0.4
|
106,820
|
381
|
0.4
|
77,237
|
366
|
0.5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank
Stock
|
32,396
|
1,319
|
4.1
|
36,338
|
1,252
|
3.4
|
35,487
|
1,379
|
3.9
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities:
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Taxable
|
648,167
|
19,230
|
3.0
|
399,721
|
12,957
|
3.2
|
279,130
|
12,335
|
4.4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax-Exempt
(2)
|
242,480
|
15,642
|
6.5
|
247,240
|
15,965
|
6.5
|
228,323
|
14,750
|
6.5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Securities
|
890,647
|
34,872
|
3.9
|
646,961
|
28,922
|
4.5
|
507,453
|
27,085
|
5.3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
|
9,322
|
554
|
5.9
|
11,878
|
684
|
5.8
|
14,220
|
854
|
6.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans:
(3)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
2,102,933
|
114,079
|
5.4
|
2,288,883
|
130,276
|
5.7
|
2,605,060
|
150,096
|
5.8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Mortgage
|
306,567
|
15,810
|
5.2
|
350,646
|
19,473
|
5.6
|
446,965
|
26,176
|
5.9
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Installment
|
320,570
|
19,273
|
6.0
|
380,293
|
23,637
|
6.2
|
458,726
|
28,490
|
6.2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax-Exempt
(2)
|
9,292
|
812
|
8.7
|
19,150
|
792
|
4.1
|
21,345
|
1,597
|
7.5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Loans
|
2,748,684
|
150,528
|
5.5
|
3,050,850
|
174,862
|
5.7
|
3,546,316
|
207,213
|
5.8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Earning Assets
|
3,744,027
|
187,004
|
5.0
|
%
|
3,862,493
|
205,443
|
5.3
|
%
|
4,245,134
|
236,161
|
5.6
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available
for Sale
|
9,225
|
14,245
|
922
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
(78,500
|
)
|
(87,058
|
)
|
(71,909
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and Due from Banks
|
62,659
|
56,635
|
72,118
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Premises and Equipment
|
51,895
|
53,870
|
58,559
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Assets
|
354,544
|
371,530
|
369,766
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
4,143,850
|
$
|
4,271,715
|
$
|
4,674,590
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest-bearing Deposits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NOW Accounts
|
$
|
774,593
|
$
|
1,453
|
0.2
|
%
|
$
|
755,793
|
$
|
3,300
|
0.4
|
%
|
$
|
699,738
|
$
|
3,606
|
0.5
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Money Market Deposit Accounts
|
469,621
|
1,557
|
0.3
|
467,313
|
2,520
|
0.5
|
431,534
|
3,550
|
0.8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Savings Deposits
|
297,073
|
668
|
0.2
|
285,760
|
812
|
0.3
|
301,261
|
1,219
|
0.4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Certificates and Other Time Deposits
|
1,032,781
|
18,603
|
1.8
|
1,295,367
|
33,244
|
2.6
|
1,686,844
|
50,016
|
3.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Interest-bearing Deposits
|
2,574,068
|
22,281
|
0.9
|
2,804,233
|
39,876
|
1.4
|
3,119,377
|
58,391
|
1.9
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Borrowings
|
455,135
|
15,609
|
3.4
|
427,242
|
16,133
|
3.8
|
567,607
|
18,702
|
3.3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Interest-bearing Liabilities
|
3,029,203
|
37,890
|
1.3
|
3,231,475
|
56,009
|
1.7
|
3,686,984
|
77,093
|
2.1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Noninterest-bearing Deposits
|
601,694
|
533,514
|
484,132
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Liabilities
|
34,513
|
36,347
|
26,326
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Liabilities
|
3,665,410
|
3,801,336
|
4,197,442
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stockholders' Equity
|
478,440
|
470,379
|
477,148
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
$
|
4,143,850
|
37,890
|
1.0
|
$
|
4,271,715
|
56,009
|
1.5
|
$
|
4,674,590
|
77,093
|
1.8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Interest Income
|
$
|
149,114
|
$
|
149,434
|
$
|
159,068
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Interest Margin
|
4.0
|
%
|
3.9
|
%
|
3.7
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_______________________________
(1) Average balance of securities is computed based on the average of the historical amortized cost balances without the effects of the fair value adjustment.
(2) Tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis, using a marginal tax rate of 35 percent for 2011, 2010 and 2009. These totals equal $5,759, $5,865, and $5,722, respectively.
(3) Non-accruing loans have been included in the average balances.
12
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME
The following table presents net interest income components on a tax-equivalent basis and reflects changes between periods attributable to movement in either the average balance or average interest rate for both earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The volume differences were computed as the difference in volume between the current and prior year times the interest rate of the prior year, while the interest rate changes were computed as the difference in rate between the current and prior year times the volume of the prior year. Volume/rate variances have been allocated on the basis of the absolute relationship between volume variances and rate variances.
|
2011 Compared to 2010
Increase (Decrease) Due To
|
2010 Compared to 2009
Increase (Decrease) Due To
|
2009 Compared to 2008
Increase (Decrease) Due To
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Fully Taxable Equivalent Basis)
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest Income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
$
|
134
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
$
|
90
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest-bearing Deposits
|
(149
|
)
|
50
|
(99
|
)
|
119
|
(104
|
)
|
15
|
670
|
(1,059
|
)
|
(389
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
(145
|
)
|
212
|
67
|
32
|
(159
|
)
|
(127
|
)
|
458
|
(470
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities
|
9,877
|
(3,927
|
)
|
5,950
|
6,686
|
(4,849
|
)
|
1,837
|
5,160
|
869
|
6,029
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
|
(151
|
)
|
21
|
(130
|
)
|
(136
|
)
|
(34
|
)
|
(170
|
)
|
646
|
(60
|
)
|
586
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans
|
(16,643
|
)
|
(7,561
|
)
|
(24,204
|
)
|
(28,329
|
)
|
(3,852
|
)
|
(32,181
|
)
|
32,919
|
(26,234
|
)
|
6,685
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Totals
|
(7,229
|
)
|
(11,210
|
)
|
(18,439
|
)
|
(21,701
|
)
|
(9,017
|
)
|
(30,718
|
)
|
39,987
|
(26,998
|
)
|
12,989
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest Expense:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NOW Accounts
|
80
|
(1,927
|
)
|
(1,847
|
)
|
274
|
(580
|
)
|
(306
|
)
|
1,441
|
(3,361
|
)
|
(1,920
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Money Market Deposit Accounts
|
12
|
(975
|
)
|
(963
|
)
|
275
|
(1,305
|
)
|
(1,030
|
)
|
1,680
|
(2,084
|
)
|
(404
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Savings Deposits
|
31
|
(175
|
)
|
(144
|
)
|
(60
|
)
|
(347
|
)
|
(407
|
)
|
187
|
(1,043
|
)
|
(856
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Certificates and Other Time Deposits
|
(5,926
|
)
|
(8,715
|
)
|
(14,641
|
)
|
(10,619
|
)
|
(6,153
|
)
|
(16,772
|
)
|
8,428
|
(14,438
|
)
|
(6,010
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Borrowings
|
1,013
|
(1,537
|
)
|
(524
|
)
|
(5,050
|
)
|
2,481
|
(2,569
|
)
|
1,577
|
(5,383
|
)
|
(3,806
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Totals
|
(4,790
|
)
|
(13,329
|
)
|
(18,119
|
)
|
(15,180
|
)
|
(5,904
|
)
|
(21,084
|
)
|
13,313
|
(26,309
|
)
|
(12,996
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in Net Interest Income (Fully Taxable Equivalent Basis)
|
$
|
(2,439
|
)
|
$
|
2,119
|
(320
|
)
|
$
|
(6,521
|
)
|
$
|
(3,113
|
)
|
(9,634
|
)
|
$
|
26,674
|
$
|
(689
|
)
|
25,985
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Tax Equivalent Adjustment Using Marginal Rate of 35%
for 2011, 2010, and 2009
|
106
|
(143
|
)
|
(2,023
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in Net Interest Income
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
$
|
(9,777
|
)
|
$
|
23,962
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. The investment securities portfolio is evaluated for OTTI by segregating the portfolio into two general segments and applying the appropriate OTTI model. Investment securities are generally evaluated for OTTI under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320,
Investments – Debt and Equity Securities
. However, certain purchased beneficial interest, including certain non-agency government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations are evaluated using the model outlined in ASC 325-10
, Investments - Other
.
In determining OTTI under ASC 320, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the Corporation has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not, will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.
When OTTI occurs, the amount of OTTI recognized in the income statement depends on whether the Corporation intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any recognized credit loss. If the intent is to sell or it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any recognized credit loss, the OTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis, less any recognized credit loss, and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If the intent is not to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis less any recognized credit loss, the OTTI has been separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors has been recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment. The Corporation’s management has evaluated all securities with unrealized losses for other-than-temporary impairment as of December 31, 2011.
The current unrealized losses are primarily concentrated within trust preferred securities held by the Corporation. Such investments have an amortized cost of $5.7 million and a fair value of $163,000, which is less than 1 percent of the Corporation’s entire investment portfolio. On all but one small pool investment, the Corporation utilized Moody’s to determine their fair value.
During 2011, management reviewed the trust preferred pool securities for OTTI related to credit losses using a cash flow analysis of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected. These cash flow analyses included forecasted loss rates applied at an individual security level based upon the characteristics of that individual security. As a result of the cash flow modeling during 2011, one trust preferred pool security was further impaired as a result of expected credit losses. Of the five partially impaired securities, remaining book values represent between 36 percent and 81 percent of par value. Discount rates used in the cash flow analyses on these variable rate securities were those margins in effect at the inception of the security added to the appropriate three-month LIBOR spot rate obtained from the forward LIBOR curve used to project future principal and interest payments. These spreads ranged from .85 percent to 1.57 percent spread over three-month LIBOR.
13
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INVESTMENT SECURITIES continued
In determining the fair value of the trust preferred securities, the Corporation utilizes a third party for portfolio accounting services, including market value input. The Corporation has obtained an understanding of what inputs were used by the vendor in pricing the portfolio and how the vendor classified the securities based upon these inputs. From these discussions, the Corporation’s management is comfortable that the classifications are proper. The Corporation has gained trust in the data for two reasons: (a) independent spot testing of the data is conducted by the Corporation through obtaining market quotes from various brokers on a periodic basis and (b) actual gains or loss resulting from the sale of certain securities has proven the data to be accurate over time.
See additional information regarding the analysis of the investment portfolio in Note 3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and approximate market value of the investment securities at the dates indicated were:
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Amortized Cost
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
|
Available for sale at December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities
|
$
|
99
|
$
|
18
|
$
|
117
|
||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
136,857
|
10,496
|
147,353
|
|||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
358,928
|
10,086
|
$
|
16
|
368,998
|
|||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
5,765
|
5,572
|
193
|
|||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
1,830
|
1,830
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total available for sale
|
503,479
|
20,600
|
5,588
|
518,491
|
||||||||||||
|
Held to maturity at December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury
|
||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
120,171
|
3,785
|
123,956
|
|||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
307,738
|
10,775
|
318,513
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total held to maturity
|
427,909
|
14,560
|
442,469
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total Investment Securities
|
$
|
931,388
|
$
|
35,160
|
$
|
5,588
|
$
|
960,960
|
||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Amortized Cost
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
|
Available for sale at December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities
|
$
|
600
|
$
|
16
|
$
|
616
|
||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
233,622
|
7,108
|
$
|
740
|
239,990
|
|||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
293,311
|
4,293
|
2,287
|
295,317
|
||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
5,856
|
5,674
|
182
|
|||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
3,265
|
3,265
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total available for sale
|
536,654
|
11,417
|
8,701
|
539,370
|
||||||||||||
|
Held to maturity at December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury
|
||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
10,070
|
389
|
5
|
10,454
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
277,357
|
2,064
|
3,605
|
275,816
|
||||||||||||
|
Total held to maturity
|
287,427
|
2,453
|
3,610
|
286,270
|
||||||||||||
|
Total Investment Securities
|
$
|
824,081
|
$
|
13,870
|
$
|
12,311
|
$
|
825,640
|
||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Amortized Cost
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
|
Available for sale at December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities
|
$
|
4,350
|
$
|
56
|
$
|
4,406
|
||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
236,933
|
9,307
|
$
|
9
|
246,231
|
|||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
154,488
|
2,321
|
831
|
155,978
|
||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
9,585
|
310
|
4,733
|
5,162
|
||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
1,830
|
1,830
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total available for sale
|
407,186
|
11,994
|
5,573
|
413,607
|
||||||||||||
|
Held to maturity at December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury
|
||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
15,990
|
327
|
13
|
16,304
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
133,520
|
2,488
|
131,032
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total held to maturity
|
149,510
|
327
|
2,501
|
147,336
|
||||||||||||
|
Total Investment Securities
|
$
|
556,696
|
$
|
12,321
|
$
|
8,074
|
$
|
560,943
|
||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Cost
|
Yield
|
Cost
|
Yield
|
Cost
|
Yield
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock at December 31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
$
|
13,238
|
6.0
|
%
|
$
|
13,522
|
6.0
|
%
|
$
|
13,432
|
6.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
18,032
|
2.0
|
%
|
20,362
|
1.6
|
%
|
25,144
|
2.5
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
31,270
|
4.0
|
%
|
$
|
33,884
|
3.3
|
%
|
$
|
38,576
|
3.7
|
%
|
||||||||||||
14
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INVESTMENT SECURITIES continued
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock have been reviewed for impairment and the analysis reflected no impairment. The Corporation’s Federal Home Loan Bank stock is primarily in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and it continues to produce sufficient financial results to pay dividends.
There were no issuers included in the investment security portfolio at December 31, 2011, 2010 or 2009 where the aggregate carrying value of any one issuer exceeded 10 percent of the Corporation's stockholders' equity at those dates. The term "issuer" excludes the U.S. Government and its sponsored agencies and corporations.
The maturity distribution and average yields for the securities portfolio at December 31, 2011 were:
|
Within 1 Year
|
1-5 Years
|
5-10 Years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities available for sale December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities
|
$
|
117
|
4.90
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
$
|
4,456
|
6.41
|
%
|
12,674
|
6.10
|
$
|
30,365
|
6.31
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
31
|
0.00
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
4,456
|
6.41
|
%
|
$
|
12,822
|
6.07
|
%
|
$
|
30,365
|
6.31
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Due After Ten Years
|
Equity and U.S. Government-
Sponsored Mortgage - Backed Securities |
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities
|
$
|
117
|
4.90
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
$
|
99,858
|
6.50
|
%
|
147,353
|
6.42
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
$
|
1,830
|
6.75
|
%
|
1,830
|
6.75
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
162
|
3.76
|
193
|
3.74
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
368,998
|
3.01
|
368,998
|
3.01
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
100,020
|
6.50
|
%
|
$
|
370,828
|
3.03
|
%
|
$
|
518,491
|
3.99
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Within 1 Year
|
1-5 Years
|
5-10 Years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities held to maturity at December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
$
|
1,835
|
1.84
|
%
|
$
|
4,533
|
2.86
|
%
|
$
|
44,735
|
6.10
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,835
|
1.84
|
%
|
$
|
4,533
|
2.86
|
%
|
$
|
44,735
|
6.10
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Due After Ten Years
|
Equity and U.S. Government-
Sponsored Mortgage - Backed
Securities |
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
Amount
|
Yield
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
$
|
69,068
|
6.32
|
%
|
$
|
120,171
|
6.03
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
307,738
|
3.05
|
%
|
307,738
|
3.05
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
69,068
|
6.32
|
%
|
$
|
307,738
|
3.05
|
%
|
$
|
427,909
|
3.89
|
%
|
||||||||||||
_______________________________
(1) Interest yields are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a 35 percent tax rate.
15
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INVESTMENT SECURITIES continued
The following tables show the Corporation’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Less than 12 Months
|
12 Months or Longer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities at December 31, 2011:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
6,176
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
6,176
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
$
|
163
|
$
|
(5,572
|
)
|
163
|
(5,572
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities
|
$
|
6,176
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
163
|
$
|
(5,572
|
)
|
$
|
6,339
|
$
|
(5,588
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Less than 12 Months
|
12 Months or Longer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities at December 31, 2010:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
$
|
31,796
|
$
|
(745
|
)
|
$
|
31,796
|
$
|
(745
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
229,441
|
(5,892
|
)
|
$
|
154
|
229,595
|
(5,892
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
151
|
$
|
(5,674
|
)
|
151
|
(5,674
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities
|
$
|
261,237
|
$
|
(6,637
|
)
|
$
|
305
|
$
|
(5,674
|
)
|
$
|
261,542
|
$
|
(12,311
|
)
|
|||||||||
LOAN PORTFOLIO
The following table shows the composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio for the years indicated:
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans at December 31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
$
|
532,523
|
19.6
|
%
|
$
|
530,322
|
18.7
|
%
|
$
|
675,860
|
20.7
|
%
|
$
|
904,646
|
24.3
|
%
|
$
|
662,701
|
23.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Agricultural Production Financing and
Other Loans to Farmers
|
104,526
|
3.9
|
95,516
|
3.4
|
121,031
|
3.7
|
135,099
|
3.6
|
114,324
|
4.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
81,780
|
3.0
|
106,615
|
3.8
|
158,725
|
4.9
|
252,487
|
6.8
|
165,425
|
5.8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and Farm Land
|
1,194,230
|
44.0
|
1,229,037
|
43.3
|
1,276,164
|
39.0
|
1,230,442
|
33.1
|
963,657
|
33.5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
481,493
|
17.7
|
522,051
|
18.4
|
621,442
|
19.0
|
806,765
|
21.7
|
597,939
|
20.8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home Equity
|
191,631
|
7.1
|
201,969
|
7.1
|
220,142
|
6.7
|
149,480
|
4.0
|
146,688
|
5.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals' Loans for Household and Other Personal
Expenditures
|
84,172
|
3.1
|
115,295
|
4.1
|
154,132
|
4.7
|
201,632
|
5.4
|
187,880
|
6.5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease Financing Receivables, Net of Unearned
Income
|
3,555
|
0.1
|
5,157
|
0.2
|
7,135
|
0.2
|
8,996
|
0.2
|
8,351
|
0.3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
39,505
|
1.5
|
29,721
|
1.0
|
35,157
|
1.1
|
32,405
|
0.9
|
29,878
|
1.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,713,415
|
100.0
|
%
|
2,835,683
|
100.0
|
%
|
3,269,788
|
100.0
|
%
|
3,721,952
|
100.0
|
%
|
2,876,843
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
(70,898
|
)
|
(82,977
|
)
|
(92,131
|
)
|
(49,543
|
)
|
(28,228
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Loans
|
$
|
2,642,517
|
$
|
2,752,706
|
$
|
3,177,657
|
$
|
3,672,409
|
$
|
2,848,615
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate Loans Held for Sale at December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $17,864,000, $21,469,000, $8,036,000, $4,295,000 and $3,735,000, respectively.
The majority of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is comprised of commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and residential real estate loans. Commercial and industrial loans made up 19.6 percent and 18.7 percent of total loans at December 31, 2011, and 2010. Commercial real estate loans made up 44 percent and 43.3 percent of total loans and residential real estate loans, including home equity, made up 24.8 percent and 25.5 percent of total loans at December 31, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The Bank generates loans from customers primarily in central Indiana, and Butler and Franklin counties in Ohio. The Bank’s loans are generally secured by specific items of collateral, including real property, consumer assets, and business assets.
16
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
LOAN MATURITIES
Presented in the table below are the maturities of loans (excluding residential real estate, home equity, individuals’ loans for household and other personal expenditures and lease financing) outstanding as of December 31, 2011. Also presented are the amounts due after one year classified according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Maturing
Within 1 Year
|
Maturing
1-5 Years
|
Maturing Over
5 Years
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
$
|
285,777
|
$
|
167,314
|
$
|
79,432
|
$
|
532,523
|
||||||||
|
Agricultural Production Financing and Other Loans to Farmers
|
87,072
|
14,564
|
2,890
|
104,526
|
||||||||||||
|
Real Estate - Construction
|
51,219
|
29,030
|
1,531
|
81,780
|
||||||||||||
|
Real Estate - Commercial and Farm Land
|
416,396
|
592,550
|
185,284
|
1,194,230
|
||||||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
22,573
|
13,282
|
3,650
|
39,505
|
||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
863,037
|
$
|
816,740
|
$
|
272,787
|
$
|
1,952,564
|
||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Maturing
1-5 Years
|
Maturing Over
5 Years
|
||||||
|
Loans Maturing After One Year with:
|
||||||||
|
Fixed Rate
|
$
|
479,255
|
$
|
260,545
|
||||
|
Variable Rate
|
337,485
|
12,242
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
816,740
|
$
|
272,787
|
||||
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
The table below summarizes non-performing assets and impaired loans for the years indicated:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Non-Performing Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-accrual loans
|
$
|
69,592
|
$
|
90,591
|
$
|
118,409
|
$
|
87,546
|
$
|
29,031
|
||||||||||
|
Renegotiated loans
|
14,308
|
7,139
|
8,833
|
130
|
145
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Non-performing loans (NPL)
|
83,900
|
97,730
|
127,242
|
87,676
|
29,176
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Real estate owned and repossessed assets
|
16,289
|
20,927
|
14,879
|
18,458
|
2,573
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Non-performing assets (NPA)
|
100,189
|
118,657
|
142,121
|
106,134
|
31,749
|
|||||||||||||||
|
90+ days delinquent and still accruing
|
580
|
1,330
|
3,967
|
5,982
|
3,578
|
|||||||||||||||
|
NPAs & 90+ days delinquent
|
$
|
100,769
|
$
|
119,987
|
$
|
146,088
|
$
|
112,116
|
$
|
35,327
|
||||||||||
|
Impaired Loans
|
$
|
79,775
|
$
|
116,204
|
$
|
178,754
|
$
|
206,126
|
$
|
86,949
|
||||||||||
Loans are reclassified to a non-accruing status when, in management’s judgment, the collateral value and financial condition of the borrower do not justify accruing interest. Interest previously recorded, but not deemed collectible, is reversed and charged against current income. Interest income on these loans is then recognized when collected.
Renegotiated loans are loans for which concessions are granted to the borrower due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower resulting in the inability of the borrower to meet the original contractual terms of the loans. These concessions may include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness, extensions of maturity date or other actions intended to minimize losses. Certain loans restructured may be excluded from restructured loan disclosures in years subsequent to the restructuring if the loans are in compliance with their modified terms. A non-accrual loan that is restructured generally remains non-accrual for a period of approximately six months to demonstrate that the borrower can meet the restructured terms. A borrower’s performance prior to the restructurings, as well as after, will be considered in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms resulting in the loan being returned to accruing status in a shorter or longer period of time than the standard six months. If the borrower’s performance under the modified terms is not reasonably assured, the loan will remain non-accrual.
Interest income of $1,304,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011, was recognized on the non-accruing and renegotiated loans listed in the table above, whereas interest income of $8,291,000 would have been recognized under their original loan terms.
In years prior to 2009, the Corporation globally included all classified loans, including substandard, doubtful and loss credits in impaired loans. At December 31, 2009, management refined the definition of impaired loans to be more specific and include all non-accrual loans and renegotiated loans as well as substandard, doubtful and loss grade loans that were still accruing but deemed impaired according to guidance set forth in ASC 310. Also included in impaired loans are accruing loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more. A loan is deemed impaired when, based on current information or events, it is probable that all amounts due of principal and interest according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. At December 31, 2011, commercial impaired loans totaled $79,775,000. A specific allowance for losses was not deemed necessary for a subset of the impaired loans totaling $59,835,000, but a specific allowance of $7,596,000 was recorded for the remaining balance of $19,940,000 and is included in the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2011. The average balance of the total aforementioned impaired loans for 2011 was $90,792,000.
17
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS continued
Potential problem loans:
In addition to the impaired loans discussed above, management has also identified loans totaling $206,088,000 as of December 31, 2011 that are deemed to be criticized, but not impaired. These loans are not included in the table above, or the impaired loan table in the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements. A criticized loan is a loan in which there are concerns as to the borrower’s ability to comply with present repayment terms.
See additional information regarding loan credit quality in Note 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
The following table summarizes the loan loss experience for the years indicated.
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for Loans Losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at January 1
|
$
|
82,977
|
$
|
92,131
|
$
|
49,543
|
$
|
28,228
|
$
|
26,540
|
||||||||||
|
Charge Offs:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
(1)
|
9,818
|
22,832
|
42,147
|
7,475
|
2,403
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Commercial Real Estate
(2)
|
29,807
|
32,823
|
34,775
|
6,580
|
2,186
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
1,441
|
2,426
|
3,770
|
3,018
|
1,845
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
7,407
|
9,437
|
8,491
|
5,536
|
2,123
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Finance Leases
|
54
|
411
|
17
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total Charge Offs
|
48,473
|
67,572
|
89,594
|
22,626
|
8,557
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Recoveries:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
(3)
|
8,828
|
6,750
|
5,248
|
1,354
|
551
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Commercial Real Estate
(4)
|
2,811
|
1,420
|
993
|
3,435
|
410
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
942
|
938
|
1,015
|
1,002
|
437
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
1,176
|
2,827
|
701
|
1,233
|
340
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Finance Leases
|
7
|
9
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Recoveries
|
13,764
|
11,935
|
7,966
|
7,024
|
1,738
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net Charge Offs
|
34,709
|
55,637
|
81,628
|
15,602
|
6,819
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Provisions for Loan Losses
|
22,630
|
46,483
|
122,176
|
28,238
|
8,507
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Adjustment Related to Acquisition
|
2,040
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance Acquired in Acquisition
|
8,679
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31
|
$
|
70,898
|
$
|
82,977
|
$
|
92,131
|
$
|
49,543
|
$
|
28,228
|
||||||||||
|
Ratio of Net Charge Offs During the Period to Average Loans Outstanding During the Period
|
1.26
|
%
|
1.82
|
%
|
2.30
|
%
|
0.52
|
%
|
0.24
|
%
|
||||||||||
The adjustment related to acquisition in the table above totaling $2,040,000 was an adjustment to the carrying amount of Goodwill resulting from the continued evaluation of the credit quality of Lincoln Bank’s acquired loan portfolio in accordance with ASC 805,
Business Combinations
. In the first quarter 2009, immediately following the acquisition of Lincoln, further analysis of the loan portfolio identified certain loans that were determined to have a lower fair value than was originally identified.
See the information regarding the analysis of loan loss experience in the “PROVISION/ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
_______________________________
(1) Category includes the charge offs for commercial and industrial, tax-exempt loans and agricultural production financing and other loans to farmers.
(2) Category includes the charge offs for construction, commercial and farm land.
(3) Category includes the recoveries for commercial and industrial, loans to financial institutions, tax-exempt loans and agricultural production financing and other loans to farmers.
(4) Category includes the recoveries for construction, commercial and farm land.
18
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Presented below is an analysis of the composition of the allowance for loan losses and percent of loans in each category to total loans as of December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
$
|
17,731
|
25.0
|
%
|
$
|
32,508
|
23.1
|
%
|
$
|
48,771
|
25.5
|
%
|
$
|
16,368
|
28.8
|
%
|
$
|
7,928
|
28.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
37,919
|
53.5
|
36,341
|
47.1
|
30,188
|
43.9
|
14,408
|
39.8
|
7,211
|
39.3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
2,902
|
4.1
|
3,622
|
4.1
|
2,242
|
4.7
|
6,608
|
5.5
|
6,086
|
6.5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
12,343
|
17.4
|
10,408
|
25.5
|
10,751
|
25.7
|
12,122
|
25.7
|
7,003
|
25.9
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Finance Leases
|
3
|
0.0
|
98
|
0.2
|
179
|
0.2
|
37
|
0.2
|
0.3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
70,898
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
82,977
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
92,131
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
49,543
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
28,228
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to multiple borrowers engaged in similar activities, which would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. As of December 31, 2011, the only concentrations of commercial loans within a single industry (as segregated by North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS code”)), in excess of 10 percent of total loans were Lessors of Nonresidential Buildings at 14.5 percent and Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings at 11.6 percent.
LOAN LOSS CHARGE OFF PROCEDURES
The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses to cover probable credit losses identified during its loan review process. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge offs less recoveries. All charge offs are approved by the Bank’s senior loan officers or loan committees, depending on the amount of the charge off, and are reported to the Bank’s Board of Directors. The Bank charges off loans when a determination is made that all or a portion of a loan is uncollectible.
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
In banking, loan losses are a cost of doing business. Although Bank management emphasizes the early detection and charge off of loan losses, it is inevitable that certain losses, which have not been specifically identified, exist in the portfolio. Accordingly, the provision for loan losses is charged to earnings on an anticipatory basis, and recognized loan losses are deducted from the established allowance. Over time, all net loan losses are charged to earnings. During the year, an estimate of the expected losses for the year serves as a starting point in determining the appropriate level of the provision for loan losses. Based on management’s judgment as to the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses the amount actually provided in any period may be greater or less than net loan losses for the same period. The determination of the provision for loan losses in any period is based on management’s continuing review and evaluation of the loan portfolio, and its judgment as to the impact of current economic conditions on the portfolio. The evaluation by management includes consideration of past loan loss experience, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, and the current condition and amount of loans outstanding. See additional information in the “PROVISION/ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Impaired loans are measured by the present value of expected future cash flows, or the fair value of the collateral of the loans, if collateral dependent. For the Corporation, all non-accrual loans, renegotiated loans, as well as substandard, doubtful and loss grade loans that were deemed impaired according to guidance set fort in ASC 310 are included in the impaired loan total. The fair value for impaired loans is measured based on the value of the collateral securing those loans and is determined using several methods. The fair value of real estate is generally determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. The appraisers typically determine the value of the real estate by utilizing an income or market valuation approach. If an appraisal is not available, the fair value may be determined by using a cash flow analysis. Fair value on other collateral such as business assets is typically valued by using the financial information such as financial statements and aging reports provided by the borrower and is discounted as considered appropriate. Information on commercial impaired loans is summarized in the table below:
DEPOSITS
The average balances, interest expense and average rates on deposits for the years ended December 2011, 2010 and 2009 are presented within the "DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY, INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL" table on page 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As of December 31, 2011, certificates of deposit and other time deposits of $100,000 or more mature as follows:
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Maturing 3
Months or Less
|
Maturing 3-6
Months
|
Maturing 6-12
Months
|
Maturing Over
12 Months
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Certificates of Deposit and Other Time Deposits
|
$
|
46,360
|
$
|
26,801
|
$
|
68,881
|
$
|
122,745
|
$
|
264,787
|
||||||||||
|
Percent
|
18
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
26
|
%
|
46
|
%
|
100
|
%
|
||||||||||
19
PART I: ITEM 1. BUSINESS
RETURN ON EQUITY AND ASSETS
See the information regarding return on equity and assets presented within the “FIVE – YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA” on page 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Balance at December 31:
|
||||||||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements (Short-term Portion)
|
$
|
146,305
|
$
|
85,621
|
$
|
101,437
|
||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances (Short-term Portion)
|
49,785
|
18,930
|
45,850
|
|||||||||
|
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
|
78,996
|
|||||||||||
|
Total Short-term Borrowings
|
$
|
275,086
|
$
|
104,551
|
$
|
147,287
|
||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements are categorized as borrowings maturing within one year and are secured by U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprise obligations, certain municipal securities and mortgage loans.
Pertinent information with respect to short-term borrowings is summarized below:
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Outstanding Balance at December 31:
|
||||||||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements (Short-term Portion)
|
0.7
|
%
|
0.5
|
%
|
0.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances (Short-term Portion)
|
4.8
|
4.9
|
4.9
|
|||||||||
|
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
|
2.7
|
|||||||||||
|
Total Short-term Borrowings
|
2.0
|
%
|
1.3
|
%
|
1.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Year:
|
||||||||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements (Short-term Portion)
|
0.9
|
%
|
0.7
|
%
|
1.0
|
%
|
||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances (Short-term Portion)
|
4.4
|
5.4
|
4.7
|
|||||||||
|
Federal Funds Purchased
|
0.4
|
0.5
|
0.1
|
|||||||||
|
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
|
2.8
|
|||||||||||
|
Total Short-term Borrowings
|
2.3
|
%
|
2.0
|
%
|
2.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Highest Amount Outstanding at Any Month End During the Year:
|
||||||||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements (Short-term Portion)
|
$
|
152,315
|
$
|
93,321
|
$
|
103,352
|
||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances (Short-term Portion)
|
104,029
|
47,854
|
104,946
|
|||||||||
|
Federal Funds Purchased
|
27,945
|
7,746
|
58,110
|
|||||||||
|
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
|
78,996
|
|||||||||||
|
Total Short-term Borrowings
|
$
|
363,285
|
$
|
148,921
|
$
|
266,408
|
||||||
|
Average Amount Outstanding During the Year:
|
||||||||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements (Short-term Portion)
|
$
|
107,641
|
$
|
83,323
|
$
|
92,931
|
||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances (Short-term Portion)
|
55,678
|
33,154
|
65,716
|
|||||||||
|
Federal Funds Purchased
|
6,180
|
1,125
|
26,995
|
|||||||||
|
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
|
78,988
|
|||||||||||
|
Total Short-term Borrowings
|
$
|
248,487
|
$
|
117,602
|
$
|
185,642
|
||||||
20
PART I: ITEM 1A. AND ITEM 1B
RISK FACTORS
There are a number of factors, including those specified below, that may adversely affect the Corporation’s business, financial results or stock price. Additional risks that the Corporation currently does not know about or currently views as immaterial may also impair the Corporation’s business or adversely impact its financial results or stock price.
INDUSTRY AND CORPORATE RISK FACTORS
|
●
|
The recent banking crisis, including the Enactment of EESA and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) may significantly affect the financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or stock price of the Corporation.
|
The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption for the last couple of years, reaching unprecedented levels. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers seemingly without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength.
EESA, which established TARP, was signed into law in October 2008. As part of TARP, the Treasury established the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) to provide up to $700 billion of funding to eligible financial institutions through the purchase of capital stock and other financial instruments for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. Then, on February 17, 2009, President Obama signed ARRA, as a sweeping economic recovery package intended to stimulate the economy and provide for broad infrastructure, energy, health, and education needs. There can be no assurance as to the actual impact that EESA or its programs, including the CPP, and ARRA or its programs, will have on the national economy or financial markets. The failure of these significant legislative measures to help stabilize the financial markets and a continuation or worsening of current financial market conditions could materially and adversely affect the Corporation’s business, financial condition, results of operations, access to credit or the trading price of common shares.
There have been numerous actions undertaken in connection with or following EESA and ARRA by the Federal Reserve Board, Congress, the Treasury, the FDIC, the SEC and others in efforts to address the current liquidity and credit crisis in the financial industry that followed the sub-prime mortgage market meltdown which began in 2007. These measures include homeowner relief that encourages loan restructuring and modification; the establishment of significant liquidity and credit facilities for financial institutions and investment banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate; emergency action against short selling practices; a temporary guaranty program for money market funds; the establishment of a commercial paper funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial paper issuers; and coordinated international efforts to address illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector. The purpose of these legislative and regulatory actions is to help stabilize the U.S. banking system. EESA, ARRA and the other regulatory initiatives described above may not have their desired effects. If the volatility in the markets continues and economic conditions fail to improve or worsen, the business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
|
●
|
The Corporation’s business and financial results are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions.
|
The Corporation’s business activities and earnings are affected by general business conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the United States economy and the state and local economies in which the Corporation operates. For example, a prolonged economic downturn, continued increase in unemployment, or other events that affect household and/or corporate incomes could result in further deterioration of credit quality, an increase in the allowance for loan losses, or reduced demand for loan or fee-based products and services. Changes in the financial performance and condition of the Corporation’s borrowers could negatively affect repayment of those borrowers’ loans. In addition, changes in securities market conditions and monetary fluctuations could adversely affect the availability and terms of funding necessary to meet the Corporation’s liquidity needs.
|
●
|
Changes in the domestic interest rate environment could reduce the Corporation’s net interest income.
|
The operations of financial institutions, such as the Corporation, are dependent to a large degree on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans and investments and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. An institution’s net interest income is significantly affected by market rates of interest, which in turn are affected by prevailing economic conditions, by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and by the policies of various regulatory agencies. Like all financial institutions, the Corporation’s balance sheet is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. Volatility in interest rates can also result in the flow of funds away from financial institutions into direct investments. Direct investments, such as U.S. Government and corporate securities and other investment vehicles, including mutual funds, generally pay higher rates of return than financial institutions, because of the absence of federal insurance premiums and reserve requirements.
|
●
|
Changes in the laws, regulations and policies governing banks and financial services companies could alter the Corporation’s business environment and adversely affect operations.
|
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Its fiscal and monetary policies determine in a large part the Corporation’s cost of funds for lending and investing and the return that can be earned on those loans and investments, both of which affect the Corporation’s net interest margin. Federal Reserve Board policies can also materially affect the value of financial instruments that the Corporation holds, such as debt securities. The Corporation and the Bank are heavily regulated at the federal and state levels. This regulation is to protect depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole. Congress and state legislatures and federal and state agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes in statutes, regulations or policies could affect the Corporation in substantial and unpredictable ways, including limiting the types of financial services and products that the Corporation offers and/or increasing the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products.
21
PART I: ITEM 1A. AND ITEM 1B
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS continued
INDUSTRY AND CORPORATE RISK FACTORS continued
The Corporation cannot predict whether any of this potential legislation will be enacted, and if enacted, the effect that it or any regulations would have on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations. See a description of recent legislation in the “Legislature and Regulatory Initiatives to Address Financial and Economic Crises” section of Item 1: Business of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
●
|
The banking and financial services industry is highly competitive, and competitive pressures could intensify and adversely affect the Corporation’s financial results.
|
The Corporation operates in a highly competitive industry that could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. The Corporation competes with other banks, savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, finance companies, mortgage banking companies, credit unions and investment companies. In addition, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks. Many of the Corporation’s competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and some have lower cost structures. Also, the potential need to adapt to industry changes in information technology systems, on which the Corporation and financial services industry are highly dependent, could present operational issues and require capital spending.
|
●
|
Acts or threats of terrorism and political or military actions taken by the United States or other governments could adversely affect general economic or industry conditions.
|
Geopolitical conditions may also affect the Corporation’s earnings. Acts or threats of terrorism and political or military actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to terrorism, or similar activity, could adversely affect general economic or industry conditions.
|
●
|
The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.
|
The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the Corporation’s loan portfolio. The Corporation’s allowance consists of three components: probable losses estimated from individual reviews of specific loans, probable losses estimated from historical loss rates, and probable losses resulting from economic, environmental, qualitative or other deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the first two components of the allowance. The process for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is critical to the Corporation’s financial results. It requires management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments, as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are uncertain. Therefore, the allowance for loan losses, considering current factors at the time, including economic conditions and ongoing internal and external examination processes, will increase or decrease as deemed necessary to ensure the allowance for loan losses remains adequate. In addition, the allowance as a percentage of charge offs and nonperforming loans will change at different points in time based on credit performance, loan mix and collateral values.
In connection with recent economic developments, many financial institutions, including the Corporation, have experienced unusual and significant declines in the performance of their loan portfolios, and the values of real estate collateral supporting many loans have declined. If current trends in the housing and real estate markets continue, it is likely that loan delinquencies and credit losses may increase. Although the Corporation believes its underwriting and loan review procedures are appropriate for the various kinds of loans it makes, the Corporation’s results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected in the event the quality of its loan portfolio deteriorates.
|
●
|
The Corporation may suffer losses in its loan portfolio despite its underwriting practices.
|
The Corporation seeks to mitigate the risks inherent in its loan portfolio by adhering to specific underwriting practices. The Corporation’s strategy for credit risk management includes conservative credit policies and underwriting criteria for all loans, as well as an overall credit limit for each customer significantly below legal lending limits. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on a regional geographic, industry and customer level, regular credit quality reviews and management reviews of large credit exposures and loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality. There is a continuous review of the loan portfolio, including an internally administered loan “watch” list and an independent loan review. The evaluation takes into consideration identified credit problems, as well as the possibility of losses inherent in the loan portfolio that are not specifically identified. Although the Corporation believes that its underwriting criteria are appropriate for the various kinds of loans it makes, the Corporation may incur losses on loans due to the factors previously discussed.
|
●
|
The Corporation faces operational risks because the nature of the financial services business involves a high volume of transactions.
|
The Corporation operates in diverse markets and relies on the ability of its employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from the Corporation’s operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside of the Corporation, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements and business continuation and disaster recovery. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. In the event of a breakdown in the internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, the Corporation could suffer financial loss, face regulatory action and suffer damage to its reputation.
22
PART I: ITEM 1A. AND ITEM 1B
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS continued
INDUSTRY AND CORPORATE RISK FACTORS continued
|
●
|
A natural disaster could harm the Corporation’s business.
|
Natural disasters could harm the Corporation’s operations directly through interference with communications, as well as through the destruction of facilities and operational, financial and management information systems. These events could prevent the Corporation from gathering deposits, originating loans and processing and controlling its flow of business.
|
●
|
The Corporation faces systems failure risks as well as security risks, including “hacking” and “identity theft”.
|
The computer systems and network infrastructure the Corporation uses could be vulnerable to unforeseen problems. The Corporation’s operations are dependent upon the ability to protect computer equipment against damage from fire, power loss or telecommunication failure. Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in operations could adversely affect the business and financial results. In addition, computer systems and network infrastructure present security risks, and could be susceptible to hacking or identity theft.
|
●
|
The Corporation relies on dividends from its subsidiaries for its liquidity needs.
|
The Corporation is a separate and distinct legal entity from its bank and non-bank subsidiaries. The Corporation receives substantially all of its cash from dividends paid by its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the Corporation’s stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the bank subsidiaries may pay to the Corporation.
|
●
|
The Corporation’s reported financial results depend on management’s selection of accounting methods and certain assumptions and estimates.
|
The Corporation’s accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how it records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation’s management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods, so they comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and reflect management’s judgment of the most appropriate manner to report the Corporation’s financial condition and results. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances yet might result in the Corporation’s reporting materially different results than would have been reported under a different alternative. Certain accounting policies are critical to presenting the Corporation’s financial condition and results, and require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are uncertain. Materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions or estimates. These critical accounting policies include: the allowance for loan losses; the valuation of investment securities; the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets; and pension accounting. Because of the uncertainty of estimates involved in these matters, the Corporation may be required to do one or more of the following: significantly increase the allowance for loan losses and/or sustain loan losses that are significantly higher than the reserve provided; recognize significant provision for impairment of its investment securities; recognize significant impairment on its goodwill and intangible assets; or significantly increase its pension liability. As part of its function of assisting the Corporation’s Board of Directors in discharging its responsibility of ensuring all types of risk to the organization are properly being managed, mitigated and monitored by management, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors oversees management’s accounting policies and methods. For more information, refer to “CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES” under Item 7 Part II of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
●
|
A write-down of all or part of the Corporation’s goodwill could materially reduce its net income and net worth.
|
At December 31, 2011, the Corporation had over $141 million of goodwill recorded on its consolidated balance sheet. Under ASC 340-20,
Other Assets and Deferred Costs
, the Corporation is required to evaluate goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, as well as on an interim basis, if events or changes indicate that the asset may be impaired. An impairment loss must be recognized for any excess of carrying value over the fair value of goodwill. The fair value is determined based on internal valuations using management’s assumptions of future growth rates, future attrition, discount rates, multiples of earnings or other relevant factors. The resulting estimated fair value could result in material write-downs of goodwill and recording of impairment losses. Such a write-down could materially reduce the Corporation’s net income and overall net worth. The Corporation also cannot predict the occurrence of certain future events that might adversely affect the fair value of goodwill. Such events include, but are not limited to, strategic decisions made in response to economic and competitive conditions, the effect of the economic environment on the Corporation’s customer base, or a material negative change in its relationship with significant customers.
|
●
|
Changes in accounting standards could materially impact the Corporation’s financial statements.
|
From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board changes the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Corporation’s financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how the Corporation records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the Corporation could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively; resulting in the restating of prior period financial statements.
23
INDUSTRY AND CORPORATE RISK FACTORS continued
|
●
|
Significant legal actions could subject the Corporation to substantial uninsured liabilities.
|
The Corporation is from time to time subject to claims related to its operations. These claims and legal actions, including supervisory actions by the Corporation’s regulators, could involve large monetary claims and significant defense costs. To protect itself from the cost of these claims, the Corporation maintains insurance coverage in amounts and with deductibles that it believes are appropriate for its operations. However, the Corporation’s insurance coverage may not cover all claims against the Corporation or continue to be available to the Corporation at a reasonable cost. As a result, the Corporation may be exposed to substantial uninsured liabilities, which could adversely affect the Corporation’s results of operations and financial condition
|
●
|
Negative publicity could damage the Corporation’s reputation and adversely impact its business and financial results.
|
Reputation risk, or the risk to the Corporation’s earnings and capital from negative publicity, is inherent in the Corporation’s business. Negative publicity can result from the Corporation’s actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance and acquisitions, and actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities. Negative publicity can adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to keep and attract customers and can expose the Corporation to litigation and regulatory action. Although the Corporation takes steps to minimize reputation risk in dealing with customers and other constituencies, the Corporation is inherently exposed to this risk.
|
●
|
Acquisitions may not produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within timeframes originally anticipated and may result in unforeseen integration difficulties.
|
The Corporation regularly explores opportunities to acquire banks, financial institutions, or other financial services businesses or assets. The Corporation cannot predict the number, size or timing of acquisitions. Difficulty in integrating an acquired business or company may cause the Corporation not to realize expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected benefits from the acquisition. The integration could result in higher than expected deposit attrition (run-off), loss of key employees, disruption of the Corporation’s business or the business of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Also, the negative effect of any divestitures required by regulatory authorities in acquisitions or business combinations may be greater than expected.
|
●
|
The Corporation may not be able to pay dividends in the future in accordance with past practice.
|
The Corporation has traditionally paid a quarterly dividend to common stockholders. The payment of dividends is subject to legal and regulatory restrictions. Any payment of dividends in the future will depend, in large part, on the Corporation’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by the Corporation’s Board of Directors. Additionally, due to participation in the CPP, the Corporation may not increase the dividend for three years from the date of the Agreement without the consent of the U.S. Treasury, unless the preferred shares sold to the U.S. Treasury have been redeemed in whole or transferred to a third party which is not an affiliate of the Corporation.
|
●
|
The Corporation’s stock price can be volatile.
|
The Corporation’s stock price can fluctuate widely in response to a variety of factors, including: actual or anticipated variations in the Corporation’s quarterly operating results; recommendations by securities analysts; significant acquisitions or business combinations; strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Corporation; new technology used or services offered by the Corporation’s competitors; news reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the banking and financial services industry, and changes in government regulations. General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, including terrorist attacks, economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes, credit loss trends or currency fluctuations, could also cause the Corporation’s stock price to decrease, regardless of the Corporation’s operating results.
None.
24
The headquarters of the Corporation and the Bank is located at 200 East Jackson Street, Muncie, Indiana. The building is owned by the Bank.
The Bank conducts business through numerous facilities owned and leased. Of the seventy-eight banking offices operated by the Bank, fifty-five are owned and twenty-three are leased from non-affiliated third parties.
None of the properties owned by the Corporation are subject to any major encumbrances. The net investment of the Corporation and subsidiaries in real estate and equipment at December 31, 2011 was $51,013,000.
There is no pending legal proceeding, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business of the Corporation or its subsidiaries, of a material nature to which the Corporation or its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their properties are subject. Further, there is no material legal proceeding in which any director, officer, principal shareholder, or affiliate of the Corporation, or any associate of any such director, officer or principal shareholder, is a party, or has a material interest, adverse to the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries.
None of the routine legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, in which the Corporation or its affiliates are involved are expected to have a material adverse impact on the financial position or the results of operations of the Corporation.
25
The names, ages, and positions with the Corporation and the Bank of all executive officers of the Corporation and all persons chosen to become executive officers are listed below. The officers are elected by the Board of Directors of the Corporation for a term of one year or until the election of their successors. There are no arrangements between any officer and any other person pursuant to which he or she was selected as an officer.
Michael C. Rechin
, 53, President and Chief Executive Officer, Corporation
Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation since April 2007; Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation from November 2005 to April 2007; Executive Vice President, Corporate Banking National City Bank from 1995 to November 2005.
Mark K. Hardwick
, 41, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Corporation
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation since December 2005; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation from April 2002 to December 2005; Corporate Controller of the Corporation from November 1997 to April 2002.
Michael J. Stewart
, 46, Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer, Corporation
Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer of the Corporation since February 2008; Executive Vice President from December 2006 to February 2008 for National City Corp; Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer for National City Bank of Indiana from December 2002 to December 2006.
Jami L. Bradshaw
, 49, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, Corporation
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Corporation since May 2007; Vice President and Corporate Controller of the Corporation from 2006 to May 2007; and Assistant Vice President and Assistant Controller of the Corporation from 2002 to 2006.
Robert R. Connors
, 62, Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer, Corporation
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Corporation since January 2006; Senior Vice President of Operations and Technology of the Corporation from August 2002 to January 2006.
Kimberly J. Ellington
, 52, Senior Vice President and Director of Human Resources, Corporation
Senior Vice President and Director of Human Resources of the Corporation since 2004; Vice President and Director of Human Resources of the Corporation from 1999 to 2004.
Jeffrey B. Lorentson
, 48, Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Corporation
Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Corporation since June 2007; Corporate Controller of First Indiana Bank from June 2006 to June 2007; First Vice President and Corporate Controller of the Corporation from 2003 to 2006; Vice President and Corporate Controller of the Corporation from 2002 to 2003.
John J. Martin
, 45, Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, Corporation
Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Corporation since June 2009; First Vice President and Deputy Chief Credit Officer of the Corporation from July 2008 to June 2009; First Vice President and Senior Manager of Lending Process of the Corporation from January 2008 to July 2008; Senior Vice President and Regional Senior Credit Officer of National City Bank from May 2000 to December 2007.
26
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders on First Merchants Corporation’s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the Russell 2000 index and the SNL Bank $1B - $5B index. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in the Corporation’s common stock and in each of the indexes (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on December 31, 2006 and tracks it through December 31, 2011.
|
Period Ending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
12/31/06
|
12/31/07
|
12/31/08
|
12/31/09
|
12/31/10
|
12/31/11
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
First Merchants Corporation
|
100.00
|
83.67
|
88.72
|
25.16
|
37.72
|
36.24
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Russell 2000
|
100.00
|
98.43
|
65.18
|
82.89
|
105.14
|
100.75
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
SNL Bank $1B-$5B
|
100.00
|
72.84
|
60.42
|
43.31
|
49.09
|
44.77
|
||||||||||||||||||
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
27
PART II: ITEM 5. AND ITEM 6.
STOCK INFORMATION
|
Price Per Share
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HIGH
|
LOW
|
Dividends Declared
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quarter
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$
|
9.45
|
$
|
6.96
|
$
|
7.87
|
$
|
5.26
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
0.01
|
||||||||||||
|
Second Quarter
|
9.70
|
9.42
|
7.90
|
7.09
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Third Quarter
|
9.40
|
9.07
|
6.70
|
7.37
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
9.04
|
9.11
|
6.63
|
7.34
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
||||||||||||||||||
Numbers rounded to nearest cent when applicable.
The table above lists per share prices and dividend payments during 2011 and 2010. Prices are as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation – Global Select Market System.
COMMON STOCK LISTING
First Merchants Corporation common stock is traded over-the-counter on the NASDAQ Global Select Market System. Quotations are carried in many daily papers. The NASDAQ symbol is FRME (Cusip #320817-10-9). At the close of business on February 17, 2012, the number of shares outstanding was 28,896,102. There were 3,659 stockholders of record on that date.
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASES
There were no purchases of the Corporation’s common stock by or on behalf of the Corporation during the quarter ended December 31, 2011.
_______________________________
(1) The “DIVIDEND LIMITATIONS” section of “BUSINESS” included as Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the “CAPITAL” and “LIQUIDITY” sections of “Management's Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 13. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include discussions regarding dividend restrictions.
28
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information about the Corporation’s common stock that may be issued under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2011.
|
Plan Category
|
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
Weighted-average
exercised price of
outstanding options
warrants and rights
|
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensations
plans (excluding securities
reflected in first column)
|
|||||||||
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders
|
1,027,766
|
$
|
22.54
|
879,875
|
(1)
|
|||||||
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders
(2)
|
8,106
|
26.73
|
413,784
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
1,035,872
|
$
|
22.57
|
1,293,659
|
(1)
|
|||||||
The selected financial data is presented within the “FIVE – YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA” on page 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
_______________________________
(1) This number does not include shares remaining available for future issuance under the 2009 Long-term Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by the Corporation’s shareholders at the 2009 annual meeting. The aggregate number of shares that are available for grants under that Plan in any calendar year is equal to the sum of: (a) 1 percent of the number of common shares of the Corporation outstanding as of the last day of the preceding calendar year; plus (b) the number of shares that were available for grants, but not granted, under the Plan in any previous year; but in no event will the number of shares available for grants in any calendar year exceed 1.5 percent of the number of common shares of the Corporation outstanding as of the last day of the preceding calendar year. The 2009 Long-term Equity Incentive Plan will expire in 2019.
(2) The only plan reflected above that was not approved by the Corporation’s stockholders relates to certain First Merchants Corporation Stock Option Agreements (“Agreements”). These Agreements provided for non-qualified stock options of the common stock of the Corporation, awarded between 1995 and 2002 to each director of First Merchants Bank, National Association (“First Merchants”) who, on the date of the grants: (a) were serving as a director of First Merchants; (b) were not an employee of the Corporation, First Merchants, or any of the Corporation’s other affiliated banks or the non-bank subsidiaries; and (c) were not serving as a director of the Corporation. The exercise price of the shares was equal to the fair market value of the shares upon the grant of the option. Options became 100 percent vested when granted and are fully exercisable six months after the date of the grant, for a period of ten years.
29
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Generally accepted accounting principles require management to apply significant judgment to certain accounting, reporting and disclosure matters. Management must use assumptions and estimates to apply those principles where actual measurement is not possible or practical. For a complete discussion of the Corporation’s significant accounting policies, see Note 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional detail.
On July 1, 2009, the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) became the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) officially recognized source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, AICPA, EITF and related literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the way companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – 2011
As of December 31, 2011, total assets equaled $4.2 billion, an increase of $2.2 million from December 31, 2010. Loans and investments, the Corporation’s primary earning assets, totaled $3.7 billion, consistent with the prior year’s total of $3.7 billion. While loans decreased $126 million, investment securities increased $120 million. Excess liquidity mainly created by the decline in the loan portfolio was used to increase the investment securities portfolio. Details of these changes are included within the “EARNING ASSETS” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses declined by $12.1 million during 2011, as the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio improved throughout the year. Details of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and non-performing loans are discussed within the “LOAN QUALITY” and “PROVISION/ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES” sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In 2011, the Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance increased by $27.6 million. This increase is due to purchases of $25 million in new policies in 2011 plus increases in the value of the existing policies.
Taxes, both current and deferred, decreased in 2011 by $9.2 million. The decrease is primarily due to the receipt of $3 million in refunds and timing differences associated with the deductibility of the provision for loan losses and the utilization of federal net operating loss carryforwards. Additionally, the deferred tax liability associated with the net unrealized gain on securities available for sale increased. Partially offsetting these changes was an increase in the deferred tax asset associated with pensions and other employee benefits. Details of the change is discussed within the “INCOME TAX” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Corporation was able to maintain all regulatory capital ratios in excess of the regulatory definition of “well-capitalized” as discussed in the “CAPITAL” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Net income available to stockholders was $9 million, or $0.34 per fully diluted common share, a decrease of $2.7 million from 2010. Income before income taxes increased by $30.6 million, primarily due to a decrease in the Provision for Loan Losses of $23.9 million. Additionally, losses and dividends related to preferred stock transactions totaled $16.2 million in 2011 versus gains and dividends of $4.8 million in 2010. The details are discussed within Note 13. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses totaled $70.9 million as of year end 2011. The allowance now provides 101.9 percent coverage of all non-accrual loans and 2.6 percent of total loans. Provision expense for the year declined from $46.5 million in 2010 to $22.6 million in 2011 as net charge offs also declined during the year from $55.6 million in 2010 to $34.7 million in 2011. Additional details are discussed within the “PROVISION/ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the primary source of the Corporation’s earnings. Net interest margin is a function of net interest income and the level of average earning assets. The following table presents the Corporation’s interest income, interest expense, and net interest income as a percent of average earning assets for the three-year period ending in 2011.
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Net Interest Income
|
$
|
143,355
|
$
|
143,569
|
$
|
153,346
|
||||||
|
FTE Adjustment
|
$
|
5,759
|
$
|
5,865
|
$
|
5,722
|
||||||
|
Net Interest Income on a Fully Taxable Equivalent Basis
|
$
|
149,114
|
$
|
149,434
|
$
|
159,068
|
||||||
|
Average Earning Assets
|
$
|
3,744,027
|
$
|
3,862,493
|
$
|
4,245,134
|
||||||
|
Interest Income (FTE) as a Percent of Average Earning Assets
|
4.99
|
%
|
5.32
|
%
|
5.56
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest Expense as a Percent of Average Earning Assets
|
1.01
|
%
|
1.45
|
%
|
1.82
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net Interest Income (FTE) as a percent of Average Earning Assets
|
3.98
|
%
|
3.87
|
%
|
3.74
|
%
|
||||||
30
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – 2011 continued
Net Interest Income continued
In 2011, asset yields decreased 33 basis points on a fully taxable equivalent basis (FTE) and interest cost decreased 44 basis points, resulting in an 11 basis point increase in the interest margin compared to 2010. A decrease in earning assets, primarily due to a smaller loan portfolio and a decline in interest-bearing liabilities, produced a negative volume variance of $2,439,000 (FTE). Furthermore, a declining interest rate environment produced a positive rate variance of $2,225,000 (FTE), resulting in a net decrease of $214,000 in net interest income.
In 2010, asset yields decreased 24 basis points (FTE) and interest cost decreased 37 basis points, resulting in a 13 basis point increase in the interest margin compared to 2009. A decrease in earning assets, primarily due to a smaller loan portfolio and a decline in interest-bearing liabilities, produced a negative volume variance of $6,519,000 (FTE). In addition, a declining interest rate environment produced a negative rate variance of $3,258,000 (FTE), resulting in a net decrease of $9,777,000 in net interest income.
Average earning assets include the average balance of securities classified as available for sale, computed based on the average of the historical amortized cost balances without the effects of the fair value adjustment. In addition, annualized amounts are computed utilizing a 30/360 day basis.
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income increased $576,000 or 1.2 percent in 2011 compared to 2010. Increases were realized in gains on the sale of mortgage loans, investment commissions, earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance and interchange from electronic card transactions were $612,000, $511,000, $498,000 and $453,000 respectively. Additionally, fee income from origination of loan level hedges increased $523,000 from 2011 to 2010. Offsetting these increases was a decrease of $1,311,000 in service charges on deposit accounts due to a decrease in the volume of customer overdrafts and returned items. Likewise, insurance commissions were $565,000 lower in 2011 than 2010.
Non-Interest Expenses
Non-interest expenses decreased $6.4 million or 4.5 percent in 2011 compared to 2010. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $1,482,000 and represented the only material increase. Base salaries were down $741,000 while commissions and incentives were up $2,697,000 over prior year. The net increase in salaries was offset by year over year declines in FDIC expenses of $2,590,000, credit related expenses of $1,822,000 and amortization of core deposit intangibles of $1,173,000.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense in 2011 was $8,655,000 on pre-tax income of $33,907,000, or 25.5 percent. For the same period in 2010, the income tax benefit was $3,590,000 on pre-tax income of $3,319,000. Additional details are discussed within the “INCOME TAXES” section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – 2010
As of December 31, 2010, total assets equaled $4.2 billion, a decrease of $310 million from December 31, 2009. Loans and investments, the Corporation’s primary earning assets, totaled $3.7 billion, a decrease of $157 million from the prior year. While loans decreased $421 million, investment securities increased $264 million. As loan demand declined and deposits increased, the excess liquidity was used to strategically reduce higher paying term deposit liabilities and borrowings such as Federal Home Loan Bank advances and brokered certificates of deposit by $400 million. Details of these changes are included within the “EARNING ASSETS” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Taxes, both current and deferred, decreased in 2010 by $19 million. The decrease is due to the receipt of $17.6 million in refunds and timing differences associated with the deductibility of the provision for loan losses, pensions, and other employee benefits. Details of the change is discussed within the “INCOME TAX” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Corporation was able to maintain all regulatory capital ratios in excess of the regulatory definition of “well-capitalized” as discussed in the “CAPITAL” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Net income available to stockholders was $11.7 million, or $0.48 per fully diluted common share, an increase of $57.5 million from 2009.
The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses totaled $83 million as of year end 2010. The allowance now provides 91.6 percent coverage of all non-accrual loans and 2.9 percent of total loans. Provision expense for the year declined from $122.2 million in 2009 to $46.5 million in 2010 as net charge offs also declined during the year from $81.6 million to $55.6 million.
31
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – 2010 continued
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the primary source of the Corporation’s earnings. Net interest margin is a function of net interest income and the level of average earning assets. The following table presents the Corporation’s interest income, interest expense, and net interest income as a percent of average earning assets for the three-year period ending in 2010.
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||
|
Net Interest Income
|
$
|
143,569
|
$
|
153,346
|
$
|
129,384
|
||||||
|
FTE Adjustment
|
$
|
5,865
|
$
|
5,722
|
$
|
3,699
|
||||||
|
Net Interest Income on a Fully Taxable Equivalent Basis
|
$
|
149,434
|
$
|
159,068
|
$
|
133,083
|
||||||
|
Average Earning Assets
|
$
|
3,862,493
|
$
|
4,245,134
|
$
|
3,463,477
|
||||||
|
Interest Income (FTE) as a Percent of Average Earning Assets
|
5.32
|
%
|
5.56
|
%
|
6.44
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest Expense as a Percent of Average Earning Assets
|
1.45
|
%
|
1.82
|
%
|
2.60
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net Interest Income (FTE) as a percent of Average Earning Assets
|
3.87
|
%
|
3.74
|
%
|
3.84
|
%
|
||||||
In 2010, asset yields decreased 24 basis points (FTE) and interest cost decreased 37 basis points, resulting in a 13 basis point increase in the interest margin compared to 2009. A decrease in earning assets, primarily due a smaller loan portfolio and a decline in interest-bearing liabilities, produced a negative volume variance of $6,519,000 (FTE). In addition, a declining interest rate environment produced a negative rate variance of $3,258,000 (FTE), resulting in a decrease of $9,777,000 in net interest income.
In 2009, asset yields decreased 88 basis points (FTE) and interest cost decreased 78 basis points, resulting in a 10 basis point decrease in the interest margin compared to 2008. Growth in earning assets, primarily due to the Lincoln acquisition on December 31, 2008, produced a positive volume variance of $26,674,000 (FTE), and a declining interest rate environment produced a negative rate variance of $2,712,000 (FTE), resulting in an increase of $23,962,000 in net interest income.
Average earning assets include the average balance of securities classified as available for sale, computed based on the average of the historical amortized cost balances without the effects of the fair value adjustment. In addition, annualized amounts are computed utilizing a 30/360 day basis.
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income decreased $2.7 million in 2010 compared to 2009. The sale of investment securities in 2010 resulted in net gains of $3,406,000, which was $7,735,000 less than the net gains for the same period in 2009. Net other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1,544,000, recognized on pooled trust preferred investments in 2010, was $5,185,000 less than the amount recognized in 2009. Service charges declined $1,845,000 from 2009 to 2010 due to a decrease in fee income for overdrafts and returned items. Increases to non-interest income included; 1) an increase in interchange income of $1,192,000, due to an increase in electronic card transactions, and 2) increased cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance (BOLI) of $484,000, due to improved market conditions.
Non-Interest Expenses
Non-interest expenses decreased $9.2 million, in 2010 compared to 2009. Salaries and employee benefits decreased $3,072,000, or 4 percent, due to cost savings realized after the Lincoln Bank acquisition in 2009 and other staff reductions. During 2009, pre-payment penalties of $1.9 million were realized as FHLB borrowings were strategically reduced. FDIC expense decreased $2,273,000 due to the special assessment that occurred in 2009 offset by increasing rates in 2010. Processing expense decreased $1,093,000 due to one-time expenses incurred in 2009 related to the consolidation of the core systems after the Lincoln Bank acquisition. Core deposit intangible amortization related to prior acquisitions decreased $388,000, or 7.6 percent. Offsetting these reductions was $2.6 million in increased OREO and credit related expenses.
Income Tax Benefit
The income tax benefit in 2010 was $3,590,000 on pre-tax income of $3,319,000. This benefit is the result of high tax-exempt interest income on investment securities and loans. For the same period in 2009, the income tax benefit was $28,424,000 on a pre-tax loss of $69,187,000. Additional details are discussed within the “INCOME TAXES” section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
32
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
CAPITAL
To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain a minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets, Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier I capital to average assets of 10 percent, 6 percent and 5 percent, respectively. The Corporation’s regulatory capital exceeded the regulatory “well capitalized” standard at December 31, 2011. See additional information on the Corporation’s and Bank’s capital ratios in Note 14. REGULATORY CAPITAL, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Tier I regulatory capital consists primarily of total stockholders’ equity and subordinated debentures issued to business trusts categorized as qualifying borrowings, less non-qualifying intangible assets and unrealized net securities gains or losses. The Corporation's Tier I capital to average assets ratio was 10.17 percent and 9.5 percent at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
At December 31, 2011, the Corporation had a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 13.92 percent and total risk-based capital ratio of 16.54 percent, compared to 12.82 percent and 15.74 percent, respectively, at December 31, 2010. Regulatory capital guidelines require a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of at least 4 percent and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8 percent.
On March 31, 2010, the Corporation entered into securities purchase agreements with six groups of institutional investors, pursuant to which the Corporation sold an aggregate of 4,200,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for gross proceeds of approximately $24.2 million. The purchase price for each share of common stock was $5.75. The common stock was issued and registered pursuant to a prospectus supplement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in connection with a takedown from the Corporation’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-158334), which was declared effective by the SEC on May 1, 2009.
On June 30, 2010, the Corporation completed an exchange of 46,400 shares of the Corporation’s Series A Preferred Stock held by the Treasury for $46,400,000 in aggregate principal amount of trust preferred securities issued through the Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary trust, First Merchants Capital Trust III. The trust preferred securities qualified as Tier 1 capital, subject to the 25 percent aggregate limitation on Tier 1 capital for these and similar securities. After the completed exchange, the Treasury continued to hold 69,600 shares of Series A Preferred Stock along with a warrant to purchase up to 991,453 shares of the Corporation’s common stock (“the Warrant”), which was also issued pursuant to the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”).
On September 9, 2011, the Corporation entered into securities purchase agreements with two investors, pursuant to which the Corporation sold an aggregate of 2,822,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for gross proceeds of approximately $21.2 million. The purchase price for each share of common stock was $7.5. The common stock was issued in a direct private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
On September 22, 2011, the Corporation entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Corporation issued 90,782.94 shares of the Corporation’s Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), having a liquidation amount per share equal to $1,000, for a total purchase price of $90,782,940. The Purchase Agreement was entered into, and the Series B Preferred Stock was issued, pursuant to the SBLF program, a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, that encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion.
Also on September 22, 2011, the Corporation entered into and consummated two letter agreements with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Corporation redeemed, out of the proceeds of the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock in the amount of $90,782,940 and cash of $25,813,171 (of which $21,165,000 was raised through the private placement of the Corporation’s common stock on September 9, 2011) for an aggregate redemption price of $116,596,111, including accrued but unpaid dividends to the date of redemption: (i) the remaining 69,600 shares of the Corporation’s Series A Preferred Stock, and (ii) all 46,400 Capital Securities held by the Treasury.
The Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, beginning October 1, 2011. The Purchase Agreement defines the dividend rate as a percentage of the liquidation amount, and can fluctuate on a quarterly basis during the first ten quarters during which the Series B Preferred Stock is outstanding, based upon changes in the level of Qualified Small Business Lending (“QSBL”) by the Bank.
The Series B Preferred Stock is non-voting, except in limited circumstances. In the event that the Corporation misses five dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock will have the right, but not the obligation, to appoint a representative as an observer on the Corporation’s Board of Directors. In the event that the Corporation misses six dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, and if the then outstanding aggregate liquidation amount of the Series B Preferred Stock is at least $25,000,000, then the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock will have the right to designate two directors to the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
The Series B Preferred Stock may be redeemed at any time at the Corporation’s option, at a redemption price of 100 percent of the liquidation amount plus accrued but unpaid dividends to the date of redemption for the current period, subject to the approval of its federal banking regulator.
On November 23, 2011, the Corporation repurchased the Warrant to purchase 991,453 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $17.55 per share with an expiration date of February 20, 2019 held by the Treasury. The Corporation was the successful bidder in a private auction for the Warrant conducted by the Treasury with a winning bid of $367,500. See Note 13. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY, to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
33
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
CAPITAL continued
Management believes that all of the above capital ratios are meaningful measurements for evaluating the safety and soundness of the Corporation. Additionally, management believes the following table is meaningful when considering performance measures of the Corporation. The table below details and reconciles tangible earnings per share, return on tangible capital and tangible assets to traditional GAAP measures.
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Average Goodwill
|
$
|
141,357
|
$
|
141,357
|
||||
|
Average Core Deposit Intangible (CDI)
|
10,655
|
15,026
|
||||||
|
Average Deferred Tax on CDI
|
(2,458
|
)
|
(3,385
|
)
|
||||
|
Intangible Adjustment
|
$
|
149,554
|
$
|
152,998
|
||||
|
Average Stockholders' Equity (GAAP capital)
|
$
|
478,440
|
$
|
470,379
|
||||
|
Average Cumulative Preferred Stock issued under the Capital Purchase Program
|
(74,181
|
)
|
(89,847
|
)
|
||||
|
Intangible Adjustment
|
(149,554
|
)
|
(152,998
|
)
|
||||
|
Average Tangible Capital
|
$
|
254,705
|
$
|
227,534
|
||||
|
Average Assets
|
$
|
4,143,850
|
$
|
4,271,715
|
||||
|
Intangible Adjustment
|
(149,554
|
)
|
(152,998
|
)
|
||||
|
Average Tangible Assets
|
$
|
3,994,296
|
$
|
4,118,717
|
||||
|
Net Income (Loss) available to Common Stockholders
|
$
|
9,013
|
$
|
11,722
|
||||
|
CDI amortization, net of tax
|
2,112
|
2,852
|
||||||
|
Tangible Net Income (Loss) available to Common Stockholders
|
$
|
11,125
|
$
|
14,574
|
||||
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.48
|
||||
|
Diluted Tangible Earnings Per Share
|
$
|
0.42
|
$
|
0.60
|
||||
|
Return on Average GAAP Capital
|
1.88
|
%
|
2.49
|
%
|
||||
|
Return on Average Tangible Capital
|
4.37
|
%
|
6.40
|
%
|
||||
|
Return on Average Assets
|
0.22
|
%
|
0.27
|
%
|
||||
|
Return on Average Tangible Assets
|
0.28
|
%
|
0.35
|
%
|
||||
34
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
LOAN QUALITY
The Corporation’s primary business focus is small business, middle market commercial, residential and commercial real estate, auto and other consumer lending, which results in portfolio diversification. Commercial loans are individually underwritten and judgmentally risk rated. They are periodically monitored and prompt corrective actions are taken on deteriorating loans. Retail loans are typically underwritten with statistical decision-making tools and are managed throughout their life cycle on a portfolio basis.
At December 31, 2011, non-performing loans totaled $83,900,000, a decrease of $13,830,000 from December 31, 2010. Loans 90 days past due, other than non-accrual and renegotiated loans, decreased by $750,000 during the same period. The amount of non-accrual loans totaled $69,592,000 at December 31, 2011. The quality and amount of non-performing loans may increase or decrease going forward due to portfolio growth, routine problem loan recognition and resolution through collections, sales or charge offs. The performance of any loan can be affected by external factors, such as economic conditions, or internal factors, such as actions of a borrower’s management. The Corporation’s coverage ratio of allowance for loan losses to non-accrual loans increased from 91.6 percent at December 31, 2010, to 101.9 percent at December 31, 2011. See additional information in the “PROVISION/ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Impaired loans include all commercial non-accrual loans and renegotiated loans as well as substandard, doubtful and loss grade loans that were still accruing but deemed impaired according to guidance set forth in ASC 310. Also included in impaired loans are accruing commercial loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more. A loan is deemed impaired when, based on current information or events, it is probable that all amounts due of principal and interest according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. At December 31, 2011, commercial impaired loans totaled $79,775,000. A specific allowance for losses was not deemed necessary for a subset of impaired loans totaling $59,835,000, but a specific allowance of $7,597,000 was recorded for the remaining balance of $19,940,000 and is included in the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2011. The average balance of the total aforementioned impaired loans for 2011 was $90,792,000.
In connection with economic developments during the past several years, many financial institutions have experienced deterioration in the performance of their loan portfolios. The values of real estate collateral supporting many loans declined, one result of which was increased charge offs. While the Corporation’s non-performing and impaired loan totals improved in 2010 and again in 2011, further deterioration of housing and real estate values may result in continued elevated levels of loan delinquencies and credit losses. Although the Corporation believes its underwriting and loan review procedures are appropriate for the various kinds of loans it makes, its results of operations and its financial condition could be adversely affected in the event the quality of its loan portfolio deteriorates.
In 2011, total net charge offs were $34,709,000, a decrease of $20,928,000 from 2010 and down $46,919,000 from 2009. The Corporation incurred eight commercial loan charge offs over $1 million in 2011 totaling $12,814,000, or 36.9 percent, of total net charge offs for the year. The largest charge off equaling $2,124,000, was incurred on a commercial and industrial loan. Four large recoveries totaling $8,471,000 were recognized during the year. Commercial and farm real estate accounted for $20,312,000, or 58.5 percent of total net charge offs. In 2009, new home construction weakened, home values declined, and construction and land development continued to decline, all of which resulted in a deterioration in values and subsequently charge offs of loans to builders and developers. While some stabilization was evident in 2010 and 2011, charge offs continued at a historically elevated level as the overall weak economic conditions continued to impact the loan portfolio.
The table below represents loan loss experience for the years indicated.
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Allowance for Loan Losses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at January 1
|
$
|
82,977
|
$
|
92,131
|
$
|
49,543
|
||||||
|
Charge Offs
|
48,473
|
67,572
|
89,594
|
|||||||||
|
Recoveries
|
13,764
|
11,935
|
7,966
|
|||||||||
|
Net Charge Offs
|
34,709
|
55,637
|
81,628
|
|||||||||
|
Provision for Loan Losses
|
22,630
|
46,483
|
122,176
|
|||||||||
|
Adjustment related to acquisition
|
2,040
|
|||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31
|
$
|
70,898
|
$
|
82,977
|
$
|
92,131
|
||||||
|
Ratio of Net Charge Offs During the Period to Average Loans Outstanding During the Period
|
1.26
|
%
|
1.82
|
%
|
2.30
|
%
|
||||||
|
Ratio of Allowance to Non-Accrual Loans
|
101.88
|
%
|
91.60
|
%
|
77.81
|
%
|
||||||
The distribution of the net charge offs for the years indicated is provided in the following table.
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
December 31,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Net Charge Offs:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
$
|
1,043
|
$
|
15,091
|
$
|
36,029
|
||||||
|
Agricultural production financing and other loans to farmers
|
(45
|
)
|
991
|
870
|
||||||||
|
Real estate loans
|
||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
6,684
|
4,550
|
14,329
|
|||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
20,312
|
26,853
|
19,453
|
|||||||||
|
Residential
|
3,871
|
6,098
|
5,132
|
|||||||||
|
Home Equity
|
2,360
|
512
|
2,658
|
|||||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and other personal expenditures
|
499
|
1,488
|
2,755
|
|||||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of unearned income
|
(7
|
)
|
54
|
402
|
||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
(8
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Total Net Charge Offs
|
$
|
34,709
|
$
|
55,637
|
$
|
81,628
|
||||||
35
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
LOAN QUALITY continued
Commercial construction and land development loans were $81,780,000 at December 31, 2011, a decrease of $24,835,000 from December 31, 2010. Construction and land development loans represent 3 percent of total loans. Management continues to closely monitor this segment of the portfolio, as well as being very selective with additional exposure to this industry.
At December 31, 2011, non-performing assets, which includes non-accrual loans, renegotiated loans, and other real estate owned, plus loans 90-days delinquent, totaled $100,769,000; a decrease of $19,218,000 from December 31, 2010 as noted in the table below. Renegotiated Loans increased $7,169,000 as the focus on commercial and consumer loan workouts continued during 2011. Other real estate owned decreased $4,638,000 from December 31, 2010. Current appraisals are obtained to determine value as management continues to aggressively market these real estate assets.
The following table summarizes the non-accrual loans, loans contractually past due 90 days or more other than non-accruing loans, real estate owned, renegotiated loans and impaired loans for the Corporation.
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Non-Performing Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Non-accrual loans
|
$
|
69,592
|
$
|
90,591
|
||||
|
Renegotiated loans
|
14,308
|
7,139
|
||||||
|
Non-performing loans (NPL)
|
83,900
|
97,730
|
||||||
|
Real estate owned and repossessed assets
|
16,289
|
20,927
|
||||||
|
Non-performing assets (NPA)
|
100,189
|
118,657
|
||||||
|
90+ days delinquent and still accruing
|
580
|
1,330
|
||||||
|
NPAs & 90+ days delinquent
|
$
|
100,769
|
$
|
119,987
|
||||
|
Impaired Loans (includes substandard, doubtful and loss)
|
$
|
79,775
|
$
|
116,204
|
||||
The composition of the non-performing assets and 90-day delinquent loans is detailed n the following table.
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Non Performing Assets and 90+ Days Delinquent:
|
||||||||
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
$
|
13,725
|
$
|
10,499
|
||||
|
Agricultural production financing and other loans to farmers
|
544
|
|||||||
|
Real estate loans
|
||||||||
|
Construction
|
17,784
|
28,907
|
||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
46,985
|
54,297
|
||||||
|
Residential
|
18,398
|
20,768
|
||||||
|
Home Equity
|
3,142
|
4,571
|
||||||
|
Individual's loans for household and other personal expenditures
|
162
|
401
|
||||||
|
Other loans
|
573
|
|||||||
|
Non performing assets plus 90+ days delinquent
|
$
|
100,769
|
$
|
119,987
|
||||
PROVISION/ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses is maintained through the provision for loan losses, which is a charge against earnings. The provision for loan losses in 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $22,630,000, $46,483,000 and $122,176,000, respectively, showing a significant decline in each year.
The amount actually provided for loan losses in any period may be greater than or less than net loan losses, based on management’s judgment as to the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. The determination of the provision in any period is based on management’s continuing review and evaluation of the loan portfolio, and its judgment as to the impact of current economic conditions on the portfolio.
The amount provided for loan losses and the determination of the adequacy of the allowance are based on a continuous review of the loan portfolio, including an internally administered loan "watch" list and an independent loan review. The evaluation takes into consideration identified credit problems, as well as the possibility of losses inherent in the loan portfolio that are not specifically identified. See the “CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2011. The process for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is critical to the Corporation’s financial results. It requires management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments, as estimates about the effect of uncertain matters are needed. The allowance for loan losses considers current factors, including economic conditions and ongoing internal and external examination processes and will increase or decrease as deemed necessary to ensure the allowance for loan losses remains adequate. In addition, the allowance as a percentage of charge offs and nonperforming loans will change at different points in time based on credit performance, loan mix and collateral values.
36
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
PROVISION/ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES continued
At December 31, 2011, the allowance for loan losses was $70,898,000, a decrease of $12,079,000 from year-end 2010. As a percent of loans, the allowance decreased to 2.6 percent at December 31, 2011 from 2.9 percent at December 31, 2010. During 2011, the allowance decreased by $5,976,000 in specific reserves against impaired loans and by $6,103,000 in the ASC 450,
Contingencies
,
allocation for loans not deemed impaired according to guidance set forth in ASC 310.
The allowance as a percent of loans decreased from year end 2010, reflecting the impact of the stabilizing economic environment on the Corporation’s loan portfolio, resulting in fewer charge offs and lower specific reserves. Loans are generally secured by specific items of collateral, including real property and business assets. The fair value for impaired loans is measured based on the value of the collateral securing those loans and is determined using several methods. The fair value of real estate is generally determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. The appraisers typically determine the value of the real estate by utilizing an income or market valuation approach. Updated “as is” or “liquidation value” appraisals are obtained as individual circumstances and or market conditions warrant. Partially charged off loans measured for impairment based on their collateral value are generally not returned to performing status subsequent to receiving updated appraisals or restructure of the loan. If an appraisal is not available, the fair value may be determined by using a cash flow analysis. Fair value on other collateral such as business assets is typically valued by using the financial information such as financial statements and aging reports provided by the borrower. Both appraised values and values based on borrower’s financial information are discounted as considered appropriate based on age and quality of the information and current market conditions.
Loans deemed impaired according to guidance set forth in ASC 310 are evaluated during problem loan meetings held within each reporting period by a special assets management team. Loan collateral and customer financial information are reviewed and the level of impairment is assessed to determine appropriate and accurate reserve and or charge off amounts. Loans or portions of loans are charged off when they are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as an asset is not warranted. It is the Corporation’s policy to recognize losses promptly to prevent overstatement of assets, earnings and capital.
The following table summarizes loan loss reserves by loan segment.
|
December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Residential
|
Finance
Leases
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance Balances:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
4,701
|
$
|
2,504
|
$
|
733
|
$
|
7,938
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
13,030
|
35,415
|
$
|
2,902
|
11,610
|
$
|
3
|
62,960
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Allowance for Loan Losses
|
$
|
17,731
|
$
|
37,919
|
$
|
2,902
|
$
|
12,343
|
$
|
3
|
$
|
70,898
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Residential
|
Finance
Leases
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance Balances:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
5,726
|
$
|
7,545
|
$
|
643
|
$
|
13,914
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
26,782
|
28,796
|
$
|
3,622
|
9,765
|
$
|
98
|
69,063
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Allowance for Loan Losses
|
$
|
32,508
|
$
|
36,341
|
$
|
3,622
|
$
|
10,408
|
$
|
98
|
$
|
82,977
|
||||||||||||
The historical loss allocation for loans not deemed impaired according to ASC 310 is the product of the volume of loans within the non-impaired criticized and non-criticized risk grade classifications, each segmented by call code, and the historical loss factor for each respective classification and call code segment. The historical loss factors are based upon actual loss experience within each risk and call code classification. The historical look back period for non-criticized loans is the most recent rolling-four-quarter average and aligns with the look back period for non-impaired criticized loans. Each of the rolling-four-quarter periods used to obtain the average, includes all charge offs for the previous twelve-month period; therefore, the historical look back period goes back seven quarters. The resulting allocation is more reflective of current conditions. Criticized loans are grouped based on the risk grade assigned to the loan. Loans with a special mention grade are assigned a loss factor and loans with a classified grade, but not impaired, are assigned a separate loss factor. The loss factor computation for this allocation includes a segmented historical loss migration analysis of non-impaired loans, by risk grade, to charge off. Given the credit improvement in the loan portfolio during 2011 and the resulting decreases in both non-impaired criticized loans and net charge offs, the overall historical loss allocation adjusted downward in 2011.
In addition to the specific reserves and historical loss components of the allowance, consideration is given to various environmental factors to help ensure that losses inherent in the portfolio are reflected in the allowance for loan losses. The environmental component adjusts the historical loss allocations for commercial and consumer loans to reflect relevant current conditions that, in management’s opinion, have an impact on loss recognition. Environmental factors that management reviews in the analysis include: National and local economic trends and conditions; trends in growth in the loan portfolio and growth in higher risk areas; levels of, and trends in, delinquencies and non-accruals; experience and depth of lending management and staff; adequacy of, and adherence to, lending policies and procedures including those for underwriting; industry concentrations of credit; and adequacy of risk identification systems and controls through the internal loan review and internal audit processes. Each environmental factor receives an individual qualitative allocation that, in management’s opinion, reflects losses inherent in the portfolio that are not reflected in the historical loss components of the allowance. At December 31, 2011, the allocation related to environmental considerations totaled $31,133,000, an increase of $15,648,000 from December 31, 2010.
37
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
PROVISION/ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES continued
As mentioned in the “CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Corporation’s primary market areas for lending are central Indiana and Butler and Franklin counties in Ohio. When evaluating the adequacy of the allowance, consideration is given to this regional geographic concentration and the closely associated effect changing economic conditions have on the Corporation’s customers. In management’s opinion, the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2011 is reflective of both the banking environment within the Corporation’s footprint and the Corporation’s recent loan and loss trends.
GOODWILL
During the deteriorating economic conditions in the last few years, the financial markets have continued to reflect lower valuations for the stocks of financial institutions, when compared to historic valuation metrics, largely driven by both the constriction in available credit and the losses suffered. Additionally, many bank stocks with geographic exposure in certain markets, including Indiana and Ohio, have been depressed. The Corporation’s stock activity, as well as the price, has been adversely impacted by the economic conditions affecting the banking industry since 2009. Management has concluded that the 2011 trading value of the stock price is not indicative or reflective of fair value (per ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
) as the Corporation’s minimal free float driven by large index fund positions, coupled with meaningful long-term retail holdings, has created unusual volatility in the stock price given modest fundamental changes in demand and appears to be impacting the price as well.
The two-step goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of impairment loss to be recognized, if any. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed to measure impairment loss, if any. Under the second step, the fair value is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to determine an implied goodwill value. This allocation is similar to a purchase price allocation performed in purchase accounting. If the implied goodwill value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The Corporation used an independent, outside firm to help determine the fair value of the Corporation, as of October 1, 2011, for purposes of the first step of the impairment test. The Discounted Earnings method (an “Income Approach”) as well as the Guideline Publicly Traded Company Method and the Transaction Method (both Market Approaches that apply market multiples to various financial metrics to derive value) were used and weighted to form the conclusion of fair value. The Discounted Earnings method was given primary weight in the fair value analysis.
The Discounted Earnings method was based primarily on: 1) management projections derived from expected balance sheet and income statement assumptions, based on current economic conditions, which show signs of improvements; 2) present value factors based on an implied market cost of equity, and; 3) historic (long-term) price-to-earnings multiples for comparable companies. Determining the Corporation’s fair value using the Discounted Earnings method involves a significant amount of judgment. The methodology is largely based on unobservable level three inputs. The test results are dependent upon attaining actual financial results consistent with the forecasts and assumptions used in the valuation model. The Discounted Earnings method relied on a terminal Price/Earnings (“P/E”) multiple. The P/E multiple used to determine terminal value was notably lower than the historic P/E multiple observed for the Corporation, the peer group, and the NASDAQ community banking index (“ABAQ”). Based on the results of the step one analysis, the fair value exceeded the Corporation’s carrying value; therefore, it was concluded goodwill is not impaired.
Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed on the Discounted Earnings methodology by testing a range of the following metrics: 1) implied market cost of equity; and 2) historic (long-term) price-to-earnings multiples for comparable companies. Based on the sensitivity testing, at the low-end of the sensitivity test range (for both metrics), fair value of the Corporation exceeded its carrying value. For reasons that include but are not limited to the aforementioned, management believes the Corporation’s recently traded stock price is not indicative of fair value.
38
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity management is the process by which the Corporation ensures that adequate liquid funds are available for the holding company and its subsidiaries. These funds are necessary in order to meet financial commitments on a timely basis. These commitments include withdrawals by depositors, funding credit obligations to borrowers, paying dividends to stockholders, paying operating expenses, funding capital expenditures, and maintaining deposit reserve requirements. Liquidity is monitored and closely managed by the asset/liability committee.
The Corporation’s liquidity is dependent upon the receipt of dividends from the Bank, which are subject to certain regulatory limitations and access to other funding sources. Liquidity of the Bank is derived primarily from core deposit growth, principal payments received on loans, the sale and maturity of investment securities, net cash provided by operating activities, and access to other funding sources.
The most stable source of liability-funded liquidity for both the long-term and short-term is deposit growth and retention in the core deposit base. In addition, Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") advances are utilized as a funding source. At December 31, 2011, total borrowings from the FHLB were $138,095,000. The Bank has pledged certain mortgage loans and investments to the FHLB. The total available remaining borrowing capacity from the FHLB at December 31, 2011 was $94,812,000.
The Bank currently has $79 million of 2.625 percent Senior Notes (the “Notes”) that are guaranteed by the FDIC under its Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) and are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Including the FDIC fee, underwriting, legal and accounting expenses, the effective rate on the Notes is 3.812 percent. The Notes are due March 30, 2012. The Notes are issued by the Bank and are not obligations of, or guaranteed by, the Corporation. In connection with the FDIC’s TLGP, the Bank entered into a Master Agreement with the FDIC that contains, among other things, certain terms and conditions that must be included in the governing documents for any senior debt securities issued by the Bank that are guaranteed pursuant to the FDIC’s TLGP.
For further discussion, see Note 9. BORROWINGS, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The principal source of asset-funded liquidity is investment securities classified as available for sale, the market values of which totaled $518,491,000 at December 31, 2011, a decrease of $20,879,000, or 3.9 percent, from December 31, 2010. Securities classified as held to maturity that are maturing within a short period of time can also be a source of liquidity. Securities classified as held to maturity and that are maturing in one year or less totaled $1,835,000 at December 31, 2011. In addition, other types of assets such as cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, and loans and interest-bearing deposits with other banks maturing within one year are sources of liquidity.
The Corporation currently has a $55 million credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. comprised of (a) a term loan in the principal amount of $5 million (the “Term Loan”) and (b) a subordinated debenture in the principal amount of $50 million (the “Subordinated Debt”). Pursuant to the terms of the underlying Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), the Term Loan and the Subordinated Debt each mature on February 15, 2015. The Term Loan is secured by a pledge of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Bank.
The Loan Agreement contains certain customary representations and warranties and financial and negative covenants. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the Loan Agreement. At December 31, 2011, the Corporation has failed to comply with a financial covenant in the Loan Agreement requiring the Corporation to maintain, on an annualized basis, a minimum return on average total assets of at least 0.75 percent.
The Loan Agreement provides that upon an event of default as the result of the Corporation’s failure to comply with a financial covenant, Bank of America may (a) declare the $5 million outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan immediately due and payable, (b) exercise all of its rights and remedies at law, in equity and/or pursuant to any or all collateral documents, including foreclosing on the collateral if payment of the Term Loan is not made in full, and (c) add a default rate of 3 percent per annum to the Term Loan. Because the Subordinated Debt is treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes, the Loan Agreement does not provide Bank of America with any right of acceleration or other remedies with regard to the Subordinated Debt upon an event of default caused by the Corporation’s breach of a financial covenant. To date, Bank of America has chosen to apply the default rate, but not to accelerate the Term Loan based on the Corporation’s failure to meet these financial covenants.
In the normal course of business, the Bank is a party to a number of other off-balance sheet activities that contain credit, market and operational risk that are not reflected in whole or in part in the consolidated financial statements. Such activities include: traditional off-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments, commitments under operating leases and long-term debt.
The Bank provides customers with off-balance sheet credit support through loan commitments and standby letters of credit. Summarized credit-related financial instruments at December 31, 2011 are as follows:
|
December 31,
|
||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
|||
|
Amounts of Commitments:
|
||||
|
Loan Commitments to Extend Credit
|
$
|
619,901
|
||
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
28,665
|
|||
|
$
|
648,566
|
|||
Since many of the commitments are expected to expire unused or be only partially used, the total amount of unused commitments in the preceding table does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
39
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
LIQUIDITY continued
In addition to owned banking facilities, the Corporation has entered into a number of long-term leasing arrangements to support ongoing activities. The required payments under such commitments and borrowings at December 31, 2011 are as follows:
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017 and
after
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating Leases
|
$
|
2,273
|
$
|
1,938
|
$
|
1,740
|
$
|
1,534
|
$
|
1,166
|
$
|
741
|
$
|
9,392
|
||||||||||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements
|
146,305
|
10,000
|
156,305
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
|
49,785
|
217
|
26,207
|
27,000
|
29,009
|
5,877
|
138,095
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Subordinated Debentures and Term Loans
|
79,148
|
55,000
|
60,826
|
194,974
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
277,511
|
$
|
2,155
|
$
|
37,947
|
$
|
83,534
|
$
|
30,175
|
$
|
67,444
|
$
|
498,766
|
||||||||||||||
INTEREST SENSITIVITY AND DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Asset/Liability Management has been an important factor in the Corporation's ability to record consistent earnings growth through periods of interest rate volatility and product deregulation. Management and the Board of Directors monitor the Corporation's liquidity and interest sensitivity positions at regular meetings to review how changes in interest rates may affect earnings. Decisions regarding investment and the pricing of loan and deposit products are made after analysis of reports designed to measure liquidity, rate sensitivity, the Corporation’s exposure to changes in net interest income given various rate scenarios and the economic and competitive environments.
It is the objective of the Corporation to monitor and manage risk exposure to net interest income caused by changes in interest rates. It is the goal of the Corporation’s Asset/Liability function to provide optimum and stable net interest income. To accomplish this, management uses two asset liability tools. GAP/Interest Rate Sensitivity Reports and Net Interest Income Simulation Modeling are constructed, presented and monitored quarterly.
Management believes that the Corporation's liquidity and interest sensitivity position at December 31, 2011, remained adequate to meet the Corporation’s primary goal of achieving optimum interest margins while avoiding undue interest rate risk. The following table presents the Corporation’s interest rate sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 2011.
|
At December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
1-180 Days
|
181-365 Days
|
1-5 Years
|
Beyond 5 Years
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Rate-Sensitive Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest-bearing Deposits
|
$
|
52,851
|
$
|
52,851
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Investment Securities
|
77,264
|
$
|
66,789
|
$
|
376,462
|
$
|
425,885
|
946,400
|
||||||||||||
|
Loans
|
1,460,438
|
299,364
|
778,092
|
122,487
|
2,660,381
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
31,270
|
31,270
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Rate-sensitive Assets
|
$
|
1,590,553
|
$
|
366,153
|
$
|
1,185,824
|
$
|
548,372
|
$
|
3,690,902
|
||||||||||
|
Rate-Sensitive Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest-bearing Deposits
|
$
|
1,289,798
|
$
|
298,845
|
$
|
760,855
|
$
|
138,649
|
$
|
2,488,147
|
||||||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements
|
146,305
|
10,000
|
156,305
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
|
49,241
|
2,055
|
57,414
|
29,385
|
138,095
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Subordinated Debentures and Term Loans
|
133,992
|
56,702
|
4,280
|
194,974
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Rate-sensitive Liabilities
|
$
|
1,619,336
|
$
|
357,602
|
$
|
828,269
|
$
|
172,314
|
$
|
2,977,521
|
||||||||||
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap by Period
|
$
|
(28,783
|
)
|
$
|
8,551
|
$
|
357,555
|
$
|
376,058
|
|||||||||||
|
Cumulative Rate Sensitivity Gap
|
$
|
(28,783
|
)
|
$
|
(20,232
|
)
|
$
|
337,323
|
$
|
713,381
|
||||||||||
|
Cumulative Rate Sensitivity Gap Ratio
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
at December 31, 2011
|
98.2
|
%
|
99.0
|
%
|
112.0
|
%
|
124.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
at December 31, 2010
|
69.2
|
%
|
76.2
|
%
|
101.7
|
%
|
119.4
|
%
|
||||||||||||
The Corporation had a cumulative negative gap of $20,232,000 in the one-year horizon at December 31, 2011 or 0.48 percent of total assets.
The Corporation places its greatest credence in net interest income simulation modeling. The above GAP/Interest Rate Sensitivity Report is believed by the Corporation's management to have two major shortfalls. The GAP/Interest Rate Sensitivity Report fails to precisely gauge how often an interest rate sensitive product reprices, nor is it able to measure the magnitude of potential future rate movements.
Net interest income simulation modeling, or earnings-at-risk, measures the sensitivity of net interest income to various interest rate movements. The Corporation's asset liability process monitors simulated net interest income under three separate interest rate scenarios; base, rising and falling. Estimated net interest income for each scenario is calculated over a twelve-month horizon. The immediate and parallel changes to the base case scenario used in the model are presented below. The interest rate scenarios are used for analytical purposes and do not necessarily represent management's view of future market movements. Rather, these are intended to provide a measure of the degree of volatility interest rate movements may introduce into the earnings of the Corporation.
40
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
INTEREST SENSITIVITY AND DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK continued
The base scenario is highly dependent on numerous assumptions embedded in the model, including assumptions related to future interest rates. While the base sensitivity analysis incorporates management's best estimate of interest rate and balance sheet dynamics under various market rate movements, the actual behavior and resulting earnings impact will likely differ from that projected. For certain assets, the base simulation model captures the expected prepayment behavior under changing interest rate environments. Assumptions and methodologies regarding the interest rate or balance behavior of indeterminate maturity products, such as savings, money market, NOW and demand deposits, reflect management's best estimate of expected future behavior.
The comparative rising 200 basis points and falling 100 basis points scenarios below, as of December 31, 2011, assume further interest rate changes in addition to the base simulation discussed above. These changes are immediate and parallel changes to the base case scenario. In the current rate environment, many driver rates are at or near historical lows, thus total rate movements (beginning point minus ending point) to each of the various driver rates utilized by management have the following results:
|
At December 31, 2011
|
||
|
RISING
|
FALLING
|
|
|
Driver Rates
|
(200 Basis Points)
|
(100 Basis Points)
|
|
Prime
|
200
|
0
|
|
Federal Funds
|
200
|
0
|
|
One-Year CMT
|
200
|
(2)
|
|
Three-Year CMT
|
200
|
(6)
|
|
Five-Year CMT
|
200
|
0
|
|
CD's
|
200
|
(42)
|
|
FHLB
|
200
|
0
|
Results for the base, rising 200 basis points, and falling 100 basis points interest rate scenarios are listed below based upon the Corporation’s rate sensitive assets and liabilities at December 31, 2011. The net interest income shown represents cumulative net interest income over a twelve-month time horizon. Balance sheet assumptions used for the base scenario are the same for the rising and falling simulations.
|
At December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||
|
RISING
|
FALLING
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Base
|
(200 Basis Points)
|
(100 Basis Points)
|
|||||||||
|
Net Interest Income
|
$
|
142,706
|
$
|
146,352
|
$
|
140,332
|
||||||
|
Variance from Base
|
$
|
3,646
|
$
|
(2,374
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Percent of Change from Base
|
0.00
|
%
|
2.55
|
%
|
-1.66
|
%
|
||||||
The comparative rising 200 basis points and falling 100 basis points scenarios below, as of December 31, 2010, assume further interest rate changes in addition to the base simulation discussed above. These changes are immediate and parallel changes to the base case scenario. In addition, total rate movements (beginning point minus ending point) to each of the various driver rates utilized by management in the base simulation are as follows:
|
At December 31, 2010
|
||
|
RISING
|
FALLING
|
|
|
Driver Rates
|
(200 Basis Points)
|
(100 Basis Points)
|
|
Prime
|
200
|
0
|
|
Federal Funds
|
200
|
0
|
|
One-Year CMT
|
200
|
(3)
|
|
Three-Year CMT
|
200
|
(37)
|
|
Five-Year CMT
|
200
|
(77)
|
|
CD's
|
200
|
(59)
|
|
FHLB
|
200
|
(47)
|
Results for the base, rising 200 basis points, and falling 100 basis points interest rate scenarios are listed below. The net interest income shown represents cumulative net interest income over a twelve-month time horizon. Balance sheet assumptions used for the base scenario are the same for the rising and falling simulations.
|
At December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||
|
RISING
|
FALLING
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Base
|
(200 Basis Points)
|
(100 Basis Points)
|
|||||||||
|
Net Interest Income
|
$
|
144,603
|
$
|
147,478
|
$
|
140,811
|
||||||
|
Variance from Base
|
$
|
2,875
|
$
|
(3,792
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Percent of Change from Base
|
0.00
|
%
|
1.99
|
%
|
-2.62
|
%
|
||||||
41
PART II: ITEM 7. AND ITEM 7A. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
EARNING ASSETS
The following table presents the earning asset mix as of December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. Earnings assets decreased by $28,712,000. Fed Funds sold and Interest-bearing time deposits decreased $7,463,000 and $12,365,000 respectively. Investments increased by approximately $119,603,000, while loans and loans held for sale decreased by $125,873,000. Excess liquidity mainly created by the decline in the loan portfolio was used to increase the investment securities portfolio. The four largest loan segments that experienced declines were residential real estate, commercial and farmland, individuals’ loans and construction. Increases were experienced in the agriculture, commercial and industrial and other segments.
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
$
|
7,463
|
||||||
|
Interest-bearing Time Deposits
|
$
|
52,851
|
65,216
|
|||||
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale
|
518,491
|
539,370
|
||||||
|
Investment Securities Held to Maturity
|
427,909
|
287,427
|
||||||
|
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
|
17,864
|
21,469
|
||||||
|
Loans
|
2,713,415
|
2,835,683
|
||||||
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
31,270
|
33,884
|
||||||
|
$
|
3,761,800
|
$
|
3,790,512
|
|||||
DEPOSITS AND BORROWINGS
The table below reflects the level of deposits and borrowed funds (repurchase agreements; FHLB advances; subordinated debentures and term loans) based on year-end levels at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Deposits
|
$
|
3,134,655
|
$
|
3,268,880
|
||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements
|
156,305
|
109,871
|
||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
|
138,095
|
82,684
|
||||||
|
Subordinated Debentures and Term Loans
|
194,974
|
226,440
|
||||||
|
$
|
3,624,029
|
$
|
3,687,875
|
|||||
The Corporation has leveraged its capital position with FHLB advances, as well as repurchase agreements, which are pledged against acquired investment securities as collateral for the borrowings. Further discussion regarding FHLB advances is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading “LIQUIDITY”. Additionally, the interest rate risk is included as part of the Corporation’s interest simulation discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “INTEREST SENSITIVITY AND DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK”.
INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense totaled $8,655,000 for 2011 compared to a benefit of $3,590,000 for 2010. The Corporation’s federal statutory income tax rate is 35 percent and its state tax rate varies from 0 to 8.5 percent depending on the state in which the subsidiary company is domiciled. The Corporation’s effective tax rate is lower than the blended effective statutory federal and state rates primarily due to the Corporation’s income on tax-exempt securities and loans, income generated by the subsidiaries domiciled in a state with no state or local income tax, income tax credits generated from investments in affordable housing projects, tax-exempt earnings from bank-owned life insurance contracts and reduced state taxes, resulting from the effect of state income apportionment. The reconciliation of federal statutory to actual tax expense is shown in Note 18, INCOME TAX, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Corporation’s tax asset, deferred and receivable decreased from $45,623,000 at December 31, 2010 to $36,424,000 at December 31, 2011. The Corporation received net refunds during 2011 of $2,977,000. The most notable refund was a result of the carry back of the remaining 2009 net operating loss to the 2008 tax year. In addition, the Corporation’s net deferred tax asset has decreased from $34,935,000 at December 31, 2010 to $31,858,000 at December 31, 2011. This change is primarily driven from the decrease in the deferred tax asset associated with the deductibility of the provision for loan losses and the utilization of the federal net operating loss carryforward. Additionally, the deferred tax liability associated with the net unrealized gain on securities available for sale increased. Partially offsetting these changes was an increase in the deferred tax asset associated with pensions and other employee benefits.
The Corporation has recorded a valuation allowance of $15,701,000 related to deferred state taxes as it does not anticipate having future state taxable income sufficient to fully utilize the deferred state tax asset. This is primarily due to the Corporation’s current tax structure as noted above.
42
INFLATION
Changing prices of goods, services and capital affect the financial position of every business enterprise. The level of market interest rates and the price of funds loaned or borrowed fluctuate due to changes in the rate of inflation and various other factors, including government monetary policy.
Fluctuating interest rates affect the Corporation’s net interest income and loan volume. As the inflation rate increases, the purchasing power of the dollar decreases. Those holding fixed-rate monetary assets incur a loss, while those holding fixed-rate monetary liabilities enjoy a gain. The nature of a financial holding company’s operations is such that there will generally be an excess of monetary assets over monetary liabilities, and, thus, a financial holding company will tend to suffer from an increase in the rate of inflation and benefit from a decrease
OTHER
The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission, including the Corporation, and that address is www.sec.gov.
The quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk information are presented in the “INTEREST SENSITIVITY AND DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
43
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders
First Merchants Corporation
Muncie, Indiana
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Merchants Corporation (Corporation) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011. The Corporation's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our audits included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Merchants Corporation as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), First Merchants Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO)
and our report dated March 15, 2012, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ BKD, LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 15, 2012
44
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Cash and due from banks
|
$
|
73,312
|
$
|
50,844
|
||||
|
Federal funds sold
|
7,463
|
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
73,312
|
58,307
|
||||||
|
Interest-bearing time deposits
|
52,851
|
65,216
|
||||||
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
518,491
|
539,370
|
||||||
|
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $442,469 and $286,270)
|
427,909
|
287,427
|
||||||
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
17,864
|
21,469
|
||||||
|
Loans
|
2,713,415
|
2,835,683
|
||||||
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
(70,898
|
)
|
(82,977
|
)
|
||||
|
Net loans
|
2,642,517
|
2,752,706
|
||||||
|
Premises and equipment
|
51,013
|
52,450
|
||||||
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
31,270
|
33,884
|
||||||
|
Interest receivable
|
17,723
|
18,674
|
||||||
|
Core deposit intangibles
|
9,114
|
12,662
|
||||||
|
Goodwill
|
141,357
|
141,357
|
||||||
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
124,329
|
96,731
|
||||||
|
Other real estate owned
|
16,289
|
20,927
|
||||||
|
Tax asset, deferred and receivable
|
36,424
|
45,623
|
||||||
|
Other assets
|
12,613
|
24,045
|
||||||
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$
|
4,173,076
|
$
|
4,170,848
|
||||
|
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
|
Deposits:
|
||||||||
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
$
|
646,508
|
$
|
583,696
|
||||
|
Interest-bearing
|
2,488,147
|
2,685,184
|
||||||
|
Total Deposits
|
3,134,655
|
3,268,880
|
||||||
|
Borrowings:
|
||||||||
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
156,305
|
109,871
|
||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
138,095
|
82,684
|
||||||
|
Subordinated debentures and term loans
|
194,974
|
226,440
|
||||||
|
Total Borrowings
|
489,374
|
418,995
|
||||||
|
Interest payable
|
2,925
|
4,262
|
||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
31,655
|
24,303
|
||||||
|
Total Liabilities
|
3,658,609
|
3,716,440
|
||||||
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
|
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Preferred Stock, no-par value:
|
||||||||
|
Authorized -- 500,000 shares
|
||||||||
|
Series A, Issued and outstanding - 0 and 69,600 shares
|
67,880
|
|||||||
|
Preferred Stock, no-par value, $1,000 liquidation value:
|
||||||||
|
Authorized -- 500,000 shares
|
||||||||
|
Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B
|
||||||||
|
Issued and outstanding -- 90,782.94 and 0 shares
|
90,783
|
|||||||
|
Cumulative Preferred Stock, $1,000 par value, $1,000 liquidation value:
|
||||||||
|
Authorized -- 600 shares
|
||||||||
|
Issued and outstanding -- 125 shares
|
125
|
125
|
||||||
|
Common Stock, $.125 stated value:
|
||||||||
|
Authorized -- 50,000,000 shares
|
||||||||
|
Issued and outstanding - 28,559,707 and 25,574,251 shares
|
3,570
|
3,197
|
||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
254,874
|
232,503
|
||||||
|
Retained earnings
|
168,717
|
160,860
|
||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(3,602
|
)
|
(10,157
|
)
|
||||
|
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
514,467
|
454,408
|
||||||
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$
|
4,173,076
|
$
|
4,170,848
|
||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
INTEREST INCOME
|
||||||||||||
|
Loans receivable:
|
||||||||||||
|
Taxable
|
$
|
149,716
|
$
|
174,070
|
$
|
205,616
|
||||||
|
Tax-exempt
|
528
|
515
|
1,038
|
|||||||||
|
Investment securities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Taxable
|
19,230
|
12,957
|
12,335
|
|||||||||
|
Tax-exempt
|
10,167
|
10,377
|
9,587
|
|||||||||
|
Federal funds sold
|
3
|
26
|
118
|
|||||||||
|
Deposits with financial institutions
|
282
|
381
|
366
|
|||||||||
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
1,319
|
1,252
|
1,379
|
|||||||||
|
Total Interest Income
|
181,245
|
199,578
|
230,439
|
|||||||||
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
||||||||||||
|
Deposits
|
22,281
|
39,876
|
58,391
|
|||||||||
|
Federal funds purchased
|
25
|
5
|
28
|
|||||||||
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
1,511
|
1,712
|
1,997
|
|||||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
4,181
|
5,368
|
9,232
|
|||||||||
|
Subordinated debentures, revolving credit lines and term loans
|
9,892
|
9,048
|
7,445
|
|||||||||
|
Total Interest Expense
|
37,890
|
56,009
|
77,093
|
|||||||||
|
NET INTEREST INCOME
|
143,355
|
143,569
|
153,346
|
|||||||||
|
Provision for loan losses
|
22,630
|
46,483
|
122,176
|
|||||||||
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
120,725
|
97,086
|
31,170
|
|||||||||
|
OTHER INCOME
|
||||||||||||
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
11,972
|
13,283
|
15,128
|
|||||||||
|
Fiduciary activities
|
7,650
|
7,692
|
7,409
|
|||||||||
|
Other customer fees
|
10,024
|
8,990
|
7,922
|
|||||||||
|
Commission income
|
5,660
|
6,225
|
6,397
|
|||||||||
|
Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance
|
2,596
|
2,098
|
1,614
|
|||||||||
|
Net gains and fees on sales of loans
|
7,418
|
6,806
|
6,849
|
|||||||||
|
Net realized gains on sales of available for sale securities
|
2,439
|
3,406
|
11,141
|
|||||||||
|
Other-than-temporary impairment on available for sale securities
|
(2,788
|
)
|
(3,049
|
)
|
(11,134
|
)
|
||||||
|
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income before taxes
|
2,388
|
1,505
|
4,405
|
|||||||||
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
|
(400
|
)
|
(1,544
|
)
|
(6,729
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other income
|
1,761
|
1,588
|
1,470
|
|||||||||
|
Total Other Income
|
49,120
|
48,544
|
51,201
|
|||||||||
|
OTHER EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
74,735
|
73,253
|
76,325
|
|||||||||
|
Net occupancy
|
10,118
|
9,935
|
10,250
|
|||||||||
|
Equipment
|
6,794
|
7,323
|
7,595
|
|||||||||
|
Marketing
|
2,002
|
1,970
|
2,134
|
|||||||||
|
Outside data processing fees
|
5,671
|
5,093
|
6,186
|
|||||||||
|
Printing and office supplies
|
1,242
|
1,259
|
1,419
|
|||||||||
|
Core deposit amortization
|
3,548
|
4,721
|
5,109
|
|||||||||
|
FDIC assessments
|
5,531
|
8,121
|
10,394
|
|||||||||
|
Other real estate owned and credit-related expenses
|
10,614
|
12,436
|
9,823
|
|||||||||
|
Other expenses
|
15,683
|
18,200
|
22,323
|
|||||||||
|
Total Other Expenses
|
135,938
|
142,311
|
151,558
|
|||||||||
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX
|
33,907
|
3,319
|
(69,187
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
8,655
|
(3,590
|
)
|
(28,424
|
)
|
|||||||
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
25,252
|
6,909
|
(40,763
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Gain on exchange of preferred stock for trust preferred debt
|
11,353
|
|||||||||||
|
Loss on CPP unamortized discount
|
(1,401
|
)
|
(1,301
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of trust preferred securities
|
(10,857
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion
|
$
|
(3,981
|
)
|
(5,239
|
)
|
(4,979
|
)
|
|||||
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
|
$
|
9,013
|
$
|
11,722
|
$
|
(45,742
|
)
|
|||||
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS PER SHARE:
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.48
|
$
|
(2.17
|
)
|
|||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.48
|
$
|
(2.17
|
)
|
|||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
25,252
|
$
|
6,909
|
$
|
(40,763
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax:
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on securities available for sale arising during the period, net of tax
of ($10,658), $106, and ($5,587)
|
19,793
|
(197
|
)
|
10,376
|
||||||||
|
Unrealized loss on securities transferred to held-to-maturity, net of tax of $2,864
|
(5,315
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale for which a portion of an other-than-temporary
impairment has been recognized in income, net of tax of $86, $539, and $1,333
|
160
|
(1,001
|
)
|
(2,476
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) arising during the period, net of tax of $1,146, ($155), and $622
|
(2,129
|
)
|
288
|
(933
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income net of tax of $714, $652, and $1,544
|
(1,326
|
)
|
(1,210
|
)
|
(2,868
|
)
|
||||||
|
Defined Benefit Pension Plans, net of tax of $2,492, ($526), and ($1,826)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net Gain Arising During Period
|
26
|
156
|
3,043
|
|||||||||
|
Prior Service Cost Arising During Period
|
(5,722
|
)
|
583
|
(326
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
|
1,068
|
50
|
22
|
|||||||||
|
6,555
|
(1,331
|
)
|
6,838
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
31,807
|
$
|
5,578
|
$
|
(33,925
|
)
|
|||||
The following table represents the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale
|
$
|
18,244
|
$
|
5,094
|
||||
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale for which a portion of an other-
than-temporary impairment has been recognized in income
|
(3,168
|
)
|
(3,328
|
)
|
||||
|
Net realized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
|
(1,841
|
)
|
288
|
|||||
|
Defined Benefit Plans
|
(16,837
|
)
|
(12,211
|
)
|
||||
|
$
|
(3,602
|
)
|
$
|
(10,157
|
)
|
|||
47
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
Preferred
|
Common Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
Paid in
Capital
|
Retained Earnings
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances, December 31, 2008
|
125
|
$
|
125
|
21,178,123
|
$
|
2,647
|
$
|
202,299
|
$
|
206,496
|
$
|
(15,664
|
)
|
$
|
395,903
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net Loss for 2009
|
(40,763
|
)
|
(40,763
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash Dividends on Common Stock ($.47 per Share)
|
(9,985
|
)
|
(9,985
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash Dividends on Preferred Stock under Capital Purchase Program
|
(4,269
|
)
|
(4,269
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warrants issued under Capital Purchase Program
|
4,245
|
4,245
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accretion of Discount on Preferred Stock
|
619
|
(619
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Stock issued under Capital Purchase Program
|
116,000
|
111,754
|
111,754
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax Benefit from Stock Options Exercised
|
60
|
60
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation
|
50,564
|
6
|
2,288
|
2,294
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Issued Under Employee Benefit Plans
|
122,572
|
16
|
809
|
825
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Issued Under Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
|
65,015
|
8
|
519
|
527
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Options Exercised
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Redeemed
|
(14,059
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(191
|
)
|
(193
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adjustment to issuance of stock related to acquisition
|
(174,474
|
)
|
(22
|
)
|
(3,429
|
)
|
(3,451
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances, December 31, 2009
|
116,125
|
$
|
112,498
|
21,227,741
|
$
|
2,653
|
$
|
206,600
|
$
|
150,860
|
$
|
(8,826
|
)
|
$
|
463,785
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
6,909
|
6,909
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax
|
(1,331
|
)
|
(1,331
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash Dividends on Common Stock ($.04 per Share)
|
(989
|
)
|
(989
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash Dividends on Preferred Stock under Capital Purchase Program
|
(5,366
|
)
|
(5,366
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative Preferred Stock Converted to Trust Preferred Securities
|
(46,400
|
)
|
(46,400
|
)
|
(46,400
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gain on Exchange of Preferred Stock for Trust Preferred Debt
|
11,353
|
11,353
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loss on Capital Purchase Program Unamortized Discount
|
1,301
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accretion of Discount on Preferred Stock
|
606
|
(606
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Private Stock Issuance
|
4,200,000
|
525
|
23,625
|
24,150
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax Benefit (Loss) from Stock Options Exercised
|
(50
|
)
|
(50
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation
|
49,833
|
6
|
1,744
|
1,750
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Issued Under Employee Benefit Plans
|
97,966
|
12
|
570
|
582
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Issued Under Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
|
11,545
|
2
|
89
|
91
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Redeemed
|
(12,834
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
(75
|
)
|
(76
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances, December 31, 2010
|
69,725
|
$
|
68,005
|
25,574,251
|
$
|
3,197
|
$
|
232,503
|
$
|
160,860
|
$
|
(10,157
|
)
|
$
|
454,408
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
25,252
|
25,252
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax
|
6,555
|
6,555
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash Dividends on Common Stock ($.04 per Share)
|
(1,067
|
)
|
(1,067
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash Dividends on Preferred Stock under Capital Purchase Program
|
(3,662
|
)
|
(3,662
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accretion of Discount on Preferred Stock
|
319
|
(319
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loss on Capital Purchase Program Unamortized Discount
|
1,401
|
(1,401
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Repurchase of Capital Purchase Program Warrants
|
(368
|
)
|
(368
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loss on Extinguishment of Trust Preferred Securities
|
(10,857
|
)
|
(10,857
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Adjustment Related to First Merchants Reinsurance Co. LTD
|
(89
|
)
|
(89
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Stock Redeemed under Capital Purchase Program
|
(69,600
|
)
|
(69,600
|
)
|
(69,600
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Stock issued under the Small Business Lending Fund
|
90,783
|
90,783
|
90,783
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Private Stock Issuance
|
2,822,000
|
353
|
20,812
|
21,165
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation
|
72,824
|
9
|
1,306
|
1,315
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Issued Under Employee Benefit Plans
|
93,797
|
12
|
657
|
669
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Issued Under Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
|
11,073
|
1
|
88
|
89
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Redeemed
|
(14,238
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(124
|
)
|
(126
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances, December 31, 2011
|
90,908
|
$
|
90,908
|
28,559,707
|
$
|
3,570
|
$
|
254,874
|
$
|
168,717
|
$
|
(3,602
|
)
|
$
|
514,467
|
|||||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
48
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Cash Flow From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
25,252
|
$
|
6,909
|
$
|
(40,763
|
)
|
|||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Provision for loan losses
|
22,630
|
46,483
|
122,176
|
|||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
5,158
|
5,702
|
5,962
|
|||||||||
|
Change in deferred taxes
|
8,256
|
(1,810
|
)
|
(10,858
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
1,315
|
1,750
|
2,294
|
|||||||||
|
Tax expense (benefit) from stock options exercised
|
50
|
(60
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Mortgage loans originated for sale
|
(297,031
|
)
|
(254,712
|
)
|
(305,778
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans
|
300,636
|
241,279
|
302,037
|
|||||||||
|
Gains on sales of securities available for sale
|
(2,439
|
)
|
(3,406
|
)
|
(11,141
|
)
|
||||||
|
Recognized loss on other-than-temporary-impairment
|
400
|
1,544
|
6,729
|
|||||||||
|
Change in interest receivable
|
951
|
2,144
|
3,158
|
|||||||||
|
Change in interest payable
|
(1,337
|
)
|
(1,449
|
)
|
(3,133
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other adjustments
|
21,693
|
36,567
|
(53,013
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
85,484
|
$
|
81,051
|
$
|
17,610
|
||||||
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net change in interest-bearing deposits
|
$
|
12,365
|
$
|
8,809
|
$
|
(35,202
|
)
|
|||||
|
Purchases of:
|
||||||||||||
|
Securities available for sale
|
(200,688
|
)
|
(311,465
|
)
|
(385,697
|
)
|
||||||
|
Securities held to maturity
|
(82,700
|
)
|
(180,311
|
)
|
(165,844
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
|
75,930
|
117,804
|
309,246
|
|||||||||
|
Proceeds from maturities of:
|
||||||||||||
|
Securities available for sale
|
60,459
|
65,688
|
134,337
|
|||||||||
|
Securities held to maturity
|
45,595
|
40,825
|
38,568
|
|||||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgages
|
33,452
|
|||||||||||
|
Change in Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
2,614
|
4,692
|
(4,257
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
|
(25,000
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Net change in loans
|
61,363
|
345,518
|
296,416
|
|||||||||
|
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned
|
13,612
|
20,641
|
39,595
|
|||||||||
|
Other adjustments
|
8,287
|
(2,348
|
)
|
(2,125
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
$
|
(28,163
|
)
|
$
|
109,853
|
$
|
258,489
|
|||||
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net change in :
|
||||||||||||
|
Demand and savings deposits
|
$
|
68,803
|
$
|
84,993
|
$
|
184,228
|
||||||
|
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits
|
(203,028
|
)
|
(352,649
|
)
|
(366,503
|
)
|
||||||
|
Borrowings
|
306,535
|
2,382
|
126,587
|
|||||||||
|
Repayment of borrowings
|
(252,509
|
)
|
(65,247
|
)
|
(294,715
|
)
|
||||||
|
Dividends on common stock
|
(1,067
|
)
|
(989
|
)
|
(9,985
|
)
|
||||||
|
Dividends on preferred stock
|
(3,662
|
)
|
(4,931
|
)
|
(4,269
|
)
|
||||||
|
Stock issued in private equity placement
|
21,165
|
24,150
|
||||||||||
|
Stock issued under employee benefit plans
|
669
|
582
|
825
|
|||||||||
|
Stock issued under dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plans
|
89
|
91
|
527
|
|||||||||
|
Cumulative preferred stock issued (CPP)
|
116,000
|
|||||||||||
|
Cumulative preferred stock issued (SBLF)
|
90,783
|
|||||||||||
|
Cumulative preferred stock redeemed (CPP)
|
(69,600
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Repurchase of stock warrant (CPP)
|
(368
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Tax (expense) benefit from stock options exercised
|
(50
|
)
|
60
|
|||||||||
|
Stock redeemed
|
(126
|
)
|
(76
|
)
|
(193
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
$
|
(42,316
|
)
|
$
|
(311,744
|
)
|
$
|
(247,438
|
)
|
|||
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
15,005
|
(120,840
|
)
|
28,661
|
||||||||
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1
|
58,307
|
179,147
|
150,486
|
|||||||||
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31
|
$
|
73,312
|
$
|
58,307
|
$
|
179,147
|
||||||
|
Additional cash flows information:
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest paid
|
$
|
39,227
|
$
|
57,458
|
$
|
80,226
|
||||||
|
Income tax paid (refunded)
|
(2,977
|
)
|
(17,674
|
)
|
3,184
|
|||||||
|
Exchange of preferred stock for trust preferred debt
|
46,400
|
|||||||||||
|
Loans transferred to other real estate owned
|
14,188
|
32,950
|
42,708
|
|||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
49
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 1
NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of First Merchants Corporation (the “Corporation”), and its wholly owned subsidiaries, First Merchants Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”), and First Merchants Insurance Services, Inc. operating as First Merchants Insurance Group (“FMIG”), conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reporting practices followed by the banking industry. The Bank also operates Lafayette Bank and Trust, Commerce National Bank and First Merchants Trust Company as divisions of First Merchants Bank, N.A.
During 2009, the Corporation completed two charter mergers of affiliate banks. On April 17, 2009 the merger of the Lincoln Bank charter into First Merchants Bank of Central Indiana, National Association, was completed and on September 25, 2009, the Corporation completed the merger of three of its subsidiary banks and charters into its single remaining full-service bank charter. The three merged charters were First Merchants Bank of Central Indiana, National Association, Lafayette Bank and Trust Company, National Association and Commerce National Bank. In September 2010, the consolidation of First Merchants Trust Company, National Association into First Merchants Bank, National Association, was completed.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Corporation is a financial holding company whose principal activity is the ownership and management of the Bank and operates in a single significant business segment. The Bank operates under a national bank charter and provides full banking services. As a national bank, the Bank is subject to the regulation of the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The OCC and the FDIC regulate or monitor virtually all areas of the Bank’s operations. The Bank must undergo regular on-site examinations by the OCC and FDIC and must submit periodic reports to both.
The Bank generates commercial, mortgage, and consumer loans and receives deposits from customers located primarily in central Indiana and Butler and Franklin counties in Ohio. The central Indiana counties served by the Bank are Adams, Brown, Carroll, Clinton, Delaware, Fayette, Hamilton, Hendricks, Henry, Howard, Jasper, Jay, Johnson, Madison, Miami, Montgomery, Morgan, Randolph, Tippecanoe, Union, Wabash, Wayne and White counties. The Bank’s loans are generally secured by specific items of collateral, including real property, consumer assets and business assets.
CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and all its subsidiaries, after elimination of all material intercompany transactions.
A brief description of current accounting practices and current valuation methodologies are presented below.
AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES
are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices when available. Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. There are no securities classified within Level 1 of the hierarchy. If quoted prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. Level 2 securities include agencies, mortgage backs, state and municipal and equity securities. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy and include corporate obligations and equity securities.
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recorded as interest income from securities. Realized gains and losses are recorded as net security gains (losses). Gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the specific-identification method.
Effective April 1, 2009, the Corporation adopted new accounting guidance related to recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairment (ASC 320-10). Available for sale and held to maturity securities are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. The investment securities portfolio is evaluated for OTTI by segregating the portfolio into two general segments and applying the appropriate OTTI model. Investment securities are generally evaluated for OTTI under ASC 320. However, certain purchased beneficial interest, including certain non-agency government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations are evaluated using the model outlined in ASC 325-10.
In determining OTTI under ASC 320, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the Corporation has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether a decline exists that is other-than-temporary, involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.
When the Corporation does not intend to sell a debt security, and it is more likely than not, the Corporation will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it recognizes the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors has been recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment.
50
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 1
NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES
continued
If the intent is to sell or it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any recognized credit loss, the OTTI is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis, less any recognized credit loss, and its fair value at the balance sheet date.
Prior to the adoption of accounting guidance on April 1, 2009, management considered, in determining whether OTTI exists, (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) the intent and ability of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. For equity securities, when the Corporation has decided to sell an impaired available for sale security and the entity does not expect the fair value of the security to fully recover before the expected time of sale, the security is deemed other-than-temporarily impaired in the period in which the decision to sell is made. The Corporation recognizes an impairment loss when the impairment is deemed other-than-temporary even if a decision to sell has not been made.
HELD TO MATURITY SECURITIES
are classified as held to maturity when the Corporation has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Securities held to maturity are carried at amortized cost. For held to maturity debt securities, the amount of an OTTI recorded in other comprehensive income for the noncredit portion of a previous other-than-temporary impairment is amortized prospectively over the remaining life of the security on the basis of the timing of future estimated cash flows of the security.
INTEREST RATE AGREEMENTS
are estimated by a third party using inputs that are primarily unobservable and cannot be corroborated by observable market data and, therefore, are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
LOANS HELD FOR SALE
are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market. Market is determined using the aggregate method. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income based on the difference between estimated sales proceeds and aggregate cost.
LOANS
held in the Corporation’s portfolio are carried at the principal amount outstanding. Certain non-accrual and substantially delinquent loans may be considered to be impaired. A loan is impaired when, based on current information or events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due (principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. In applying the provisions of ASC 310, the Corporation considers its investment in one-to-four family residential loans and consumer installment loans to be homogeneous and therefore excluded from separate identification for evaluation of impairment. Interest income is accrued on the principal balances of loans, except for installment loans with add-on interest, for which a method that approximates the level yield method is used. The accrual of interest on impaired loans is discontinued when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed when considered uncollectable. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received and the loan is returned to accruing status. Certain loan fees and direct costs are being deferred and amortized as an adjustment of yield on the loans.
Impaired loans are carried at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate, or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to increase, such increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of the loan is confirmed. The valuation would be considered Level 3, consisting of appraisals of underlying collateral and discounted cash flow analysis.
Loan commitments and letters-of-credit generally have short-term, variable-rate features and contain clauses which limit the Bank’s exposure to changes in customer credit quality. Accordingly, their carrying values, which are immaterial at the respective balance sheet dates, are reasonable estimates of fair value.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
is maintained to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio and is based on ongoing, quarterly assessments of the probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is charged against current operating results. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The Corporation’s strategy for credit risk management includes conservative credit policies and underwriting criteria for all loans, as well as an overall credit limit for each customer significantly below legal lending limits. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on a regional geographic, industry and customer level, regular credit quality reviews and management reviews of large credit exposures and loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality.
The Corporation’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of three key elements – the determination of the appropriate reserves for specifically identified loans, probable losses estimated from historical loss rates, and probable losses resulting from economic, environmental, qualitative or other deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the first two components of the allowance.
Larger commercial loans that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review. Where appropriate, reserves are allocated to individual loans based on management’s estimate of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan given the availability of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available to the Corporation. Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired as provided in ASC 310. Any allowances for impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or fair value of the underlying collateral. The Corporation evaluates the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for a loss accrual. Historical loss rates are applied to other commercial loans not subject to specific reserve allocations.
51
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 1
NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
continued
The historical allocation for commercial loans graded pass are established by loan segments using loss rates based on the Corporation’s migration analysis. This migration analysis shows the loss rates for each segment of loans based on the loan grades at the beginning of the twelve month period. This loss rate is then applied to the current portfolio of loans in each respective loan segment.
Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment and residential mortgage loans, are not individually risk graded. Reserves are established for each segment of loans using loss rates based on charge offs for the same period as the migration analysis used for commercial loans.
Historical loss allocations for commercial and consumer loans may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. Factors which management considers in the analysis include the effects of the national and local economies, trends in loan growth and charge-off rates, changes in mix, concentration of loans in specific industries, asset quality trends (delinquencies, charge offs and non-accrual loans), risk management and loan administration, changes in the internal lending policies and credit standards, examination results from bank regulatory agencies and the Corporation’s internal loan review.
PENSION
benefits are provided to the Corporation’s employees. Its accounting policies related to pensions and other post retirement benefits reflect the guidance in ASC 715,
Compensation – Retirement Benefits.
The Corporation does not consolidate the assets and liabilities associated with the pension plan. Instead, the Corporation recognizes the funded status of the plan in the balance sheet. The measurement of the funded status and the annual pension expense involves actuarial and economic assumptions. Various statistical and other factors, which attempt to anticipate future events, are used in calculating the expense and liabilities related to the plans. Key factors include assumptions on the expected rates of return on plan assets, discount rates, expected rates of salary increases and health care costs and trends. The Corporation considers market conditions, including changes in investment returns and interest rates in making these assumptions. The primary assumptions used in determining the Corporation’s pension and post retirement benefit obligations and related expenses are presented in Note 17. PENSION AND OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
is carried at cost net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line and declining balance methods based on the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to forty years. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, while major additions and improvements are capitalized. Gains and losses on dispositions are included in current operations.
FEDERAL RESERVE AND FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK
are required investments for institutions that are members of the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) and Federal Home Loan Bank systems. The required investment in the common stock is based on a predetermined formula.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
that are subject to amortization, including core deposit intangibles, are being amortized on both the straight-line and accelerated basis over three to twenty years. Intangible assets are periodically evaluated as to the recoverability of their carrying value.
GOODWILL
is maintained by applying the provisions of ASC 350. For purchase acquisitions, the Corporation is required to record the assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, and the liabilities assumed at their fair value, which in many instances involves estimates based on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques that may include estimates of attrition, inflation, asset growth rates or other relevant factors. In addition, the determination of the useful lives for which an intangible asset will be amortized is subjective.
Under ASC 350,
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
, the Corporation is required to evaluate goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, as well as on an interim basis, if events or changes indicate that the asset may be impaired, indicating that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Corporation has historically elected to test for goodwill impairment as of September 30 of each year. Based on the economic environment, earnings and stock price in 2011, the Corporation used a third party to evaluate goodwill for impairment as of October 1, 2011. The methodology and results of the test are further discussed in the “GOODWILL” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. An impairment loss must be recognized for any excess of carrying value over fair value of the goodwill or the indefinite-lived intangible with subsequent reversal of the impairment loss being prohibited. The tests for impairment fair values are based on internal valuations using management’s assumptions of future growth rates, future attrition, discount rates, multiples of earnings or other relevant factors. The resulting estimated fair values could have a significant impact on the carrying values of goodwill or intangibles and could result in impairment losses being recorded in future periods.
The Corporation cannot predict the occurrence of certain future events that might adversely affect the reported value of goodwill. Such events include, but are not limited to, strategic decisions made in response to economic and competitive conditions, the effect of the economic environment on the Corporation’s customer base, or a material negative change in its relationship with significant customers.
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
consists of assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure and are held for sale. They are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net income or expense from foreclosed assets.
52
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 1
NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
are carried at the fair value of the derivatives and reflects the estimated amounts that would have been received to terminate these contracts at the reporting date based upon pricing or valuation models applied to current market information.
As part of the asset/liability management program, the Corporation will utilize, from time to time, interest rate floors, caps or swaps to reduce its sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations. These are derivative instruments, which are recorded as assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Changes in the fair values of derivatives are reported in the consolidated statements of operations or other comprehensive income (“OCI”) depending on the use of the derivative and whether the instrument qualifies for hedge accounting. The key criterion for the hedge accounting is that the hedged relationship must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in those cash flows that are attributable to the hedged risk, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis.
Derivatives that qualify for the hedge accounting treatment are designated as either: a hedge of the fair value of the recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (a fair value hedge) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (a cash flow hedge). To date, the Corporation has only entered into a cash flow hedge. For cash flow hedges, changes in the fair values of the derivative instruments are reported in OCI to the extent the hedge is effective. The gains and losses on derivative instruments that are reported in OCI are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations in the periods in which the results of operations are impacted by the variability of the cash flows of the hedged item. Generally, net interest income is increased or decreased by amounts receivable or payable with respect to the derivatives, which qualify for hedge accounting. At inception of the hedge, the Corporation establishes the method it uses for assessing the effectiveness of the hedging derivative and the measurement approach for determining the ineffective aspect of the hedge. The ineffective portion of the hedge, if any, is recognized currently in the consolidated statements of operations. The Corporation excludes the time value expiration of the hedge when measuring ineffectiveness.
The Corporation offers interest rate derivative products (e.g. interest rate swaps) to certain of its high-quality commercial borrowers. This product allows customers to enter into an agreement with the Corporation to swap their variable rate loan to a fixed rate. These derivative products are designed to reduce, eliminate or modify the risk of changes in the borrower’s interest rate or market price risk. The extension of credit incurred through the execution of these derivative products is subject to the same approvals and rigorous underwriting standards as the related traditional credit product. The Corporation limits its risk exposure to these products by entering into a mirror-image, offsetting swap agreement with a separate, well-capitalized and rated counterparty previously approved by the Credit and Asset Liability Committee. By using these interest rate swap arrangements, the Corporation is also better insulated from the interest rate risk associated with underwriting fixed-rate loans. These derivative contracts are not designated against specific assets or liabilities under ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
, and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. The derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and changes in fair value of both the customer and the offsetting swap agreements are recorded (and essentially offset) in non-interest income. The fair value of the derivative instruments incorporates a consideration of credit risk (in accordance with ASC 820), resulting in some volatility in earnings each period.
INCOME TAX
in the consolidated statements of income includes deferred income tax provisions or benefits for all significant temporary differences in recognizing income and expenses for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The Corporation files consolidated income tax returns with its subsidiaries.
The Corporation adopted the provisions of the ASC 740,
Income Taxes
, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. As a result of the implementation of ASC 740, the Corporation did not identify any uncertain tax positions that it believes should be recognized in the financial statements. The tax years still subject to examination by taxing authorities are years subsequent to 2007.
STOCK OPTION AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD PLANS
are maintained by the Corporation. The compensation costs are recognized for stock options and restricted stock awards issued to employees and directors based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. The market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards. Compensation expense is recognized over the appropriate service period, which is generally two or three years.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
have been computed based upon the weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding during each year.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
have been made to prior financial statements to conform to the current financial statement presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.
CURRENT ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
continue to present financial institutions with circumstances and challenges which, in some cases, have resulted in large and unanticipated declines in the fair values of investments and other assets, constraints on liquidity and capital and significant credit quality problems, including severe volatility in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting loans.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared using values and information currently available to the Corporation.
Given the volatility of current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities recorded in the financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments in asset values, the allowance for loan losses and capital that could negatively impact the Corporation’s ability to meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity.
53
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 2
RESTRICTION ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The Corporation considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents is defined to include cash on hand, deposits in other institutions and federal funds sold.
Effective October 3, 2008, the FDIC’s insurance limits temporarily increased to $250,000. On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law, which, in part permanently raised the standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000. At December 31, 2011, the Corporation’s interest-bearing cash accounts held at other institutions exceeded federally insured limits by approximately $12,037,000. Each correspondent bank’s financial performance and market rating are reviewed on a quarterly basis to ensure the Corporation has deposits only at institutions providing minimal risk for those exceeding the federally insured limits.
On November 9, 2010, the FDIC implemented section 343 of the Dodd-Frank Act providing unlimited insurance coverage on noninterest-bearing transaction accounts. Beginning December 31, 2010, through December 31, 2012, all noninterest-bearing transaction accounts are fully insured, regardless of the balance of the account, at all FDIC-insured institutions. The Corporation’s noninterest-bearing transaction deposits at other institutions of approximately $10,320,000 are fully insured.
Additionally, the Corporation had approximately $36,963,000 at the Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank, which are government-sponsored entities not insured by the FDIC.
The Corporation is required to maintain reserve funds in cash and/or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve required at December 31, 2011, was $23,668,000.
NOTE 3
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and approximate market value of the investment securities at the dates indicated were:
|
Amortized Cost
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
Available for sale at December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities
|
$
|
99
|
$
|
18
|
$
|
117
|
||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
136,857
|
10,496
|
147,353
|
|||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
358,928
|
10,086
|
$
|
16
|
368,998
|
|||||||||||
|
Corporate Obligations
|
5,765
|
5,572
|
193
|
|||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
1,830
|
1,830
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total available for sale
|
503,479
|
20,600
|
5,588
|
518,491
|
||||||||||||
|
Held to maturity at December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
120,171
|
3,785
|
123,956
|
|||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
307,738
|
10,775
|
318,513
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total held to maturity
|
427,909
|
14,560
|
442,469
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total Investment Securities
|
$
|
931,388
|
$
|
35,160
|
$
|
5,588
|
$
|
960,960
|
||||||||
|
Available for sale at December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities
|
$
|
600
|
$
|
16
|
$
|
616
|
||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
233,622
|
7,108
|
$
|
740
|
239,990
|
|||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
293,311
|
4,293
|
2,287
|
295,317
|
||||||||||||
|
Corporate Obligations
|
5,856
|
5,674
|
182
|
|||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
3,265
|
3,265
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total available for sale
|
536,654
|
11,417
|
8,701
|
539,370
|
||||||||||||
|
Held to maturity at December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
10,070
|
389
|
5
|
10,454
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
277,357
|
2,064
|
3,605
|
275,816
|
||||||||||||
|
Total held to maturity
|
287,427
|
2,453
|
3,610
|
286,270
|
||||||||||||
|
Total Investment Securities
|
$
|
824,081
|
$
|
13,870
|
$
|
12,311
|
$
|
825,640
|
||||||||
In August of 2011, the Corporation transferred selected state and municipal securities from available for sale to held to maturity. The cost basis of the securities was $97.3 million prior to the transfer and was increased by the $8.5 million in unrealized gains to $105.8 million. The Corporation does not intend to sell the securities; therefore, the securities were transferred to held to maturity.
Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost. The historical cost of these investments totaled $11,925,000 and $273,853,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Total fair value of these investments was $6,339,000 and $261,542,000, which is approximately 0.7 and 31.6 percent of the Corporation's available for sale and held to maturity investment portfolio at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
54
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 3
INVESTMENT SECURITIES continued
Except as discussed below, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary. Should the impairment of any of these securities become other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) is identified.
The Corporation’s management has evaluated all securities with unrealized losses for OTTI as of December 31, 2011. The evaluations are based on the nature of the securities, the extent and duration of the loss and the intent and ability of the Corporation to hold these securities either to maturity or through the expected recovery period.
The current unrealized losses are primarily concentrated within trust preferred securities held by the Corporation. Such investments have an amortized cost of $5.7 million and a fair value of $163,000, which is less than 1 percent of the Corporation’s entire investment portfolio. On all but one small pool investment, the Corporation utilized Moody’s to determine their fair value.
In determining the fair value of the trust preferred securities, the Corporation utilizes a third party for portfolio accounting services, including market value input. The Corporation has obtained an understanding of what inputs are being used by the vendor in pricing the portfolio and how the vendor was classifying these securities based upon these inputs. From these discussions, the Corporation’s management is comfortable that the classifications are proper. The Corporation has gained trust in the data for two reasons: (a) independent spot testing of the data is conducted by the Corporation through obtaining market quotes from various brokers on a periodic basis and (b) actual gains or loss resulting from the sale of certain securities has proven the data to be accurate over time. Discount rates used in the cash flow analysis on these variable rate securities were those margins in effect at the inception of the security added to the appropriate three-month LIBOR spot rate obtained from the forward LIBOR curve used to project future principal and interest payments. These spreads ranged from .85 percent to 1.57 percent spread over LIBOR.
U.S. Government-Sponsored Mortgage-Backed Securities
The unrealized losses on the Corporation’s investment in government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities were a result of interest rate changes. The Corporation expects to recover the amortized cost basis over the term of the securities. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Corporation does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not, the Corporation will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Corporation does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2011. As noted in the table above, the government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities portfolio contains unrealized losses of $16,000 on two securities in the available for sale portfolio.
Corporate Obligations
The Corporation’s unrealized losses on trust preferred securities total $5.6 million on a book value of $5.7 million. The decline in value is attributable to temporary illiquidity and the financial crisis affecting these markets coupled with the potential credit loss resulting from the adverse change in expected cash flows. Due to the illiquidity in the market, it is unlikely that the Corporation would be able to recover its investment in these securities if the Corporation sold the securities at this time. The Corporation has analyzed the cash flow characteristics of the securities and this analysis included utilizing the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of deferrals or defaults of trust preferred securities. The Corporation has recognized a loss of $400,000 in 2011, equal to the credit loss, establishing a new, lower amortized cost basis. The credit loss was calculated by comparing expected discounted cash flows based on performance indicators of the underlying assets in the security to the carrying value of the investment. Because the Corporation does not intend to sell the investment and it is not more likely than not, the Corporation will be required to sell the investment before recovery of its new, lower amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, it does not consider the remainder of the investment securities, which are classified as Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy, to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2011.
Certain Losses Recognized on Investments
Certain debt securities have experienced fair value deterioration due to credit losses and other market factors. The following table provides information about debt securities for which only a credit loss was recognized in income and other losses are recorded in other comprehensive income.
|
Accumulated Credit Losses in 2011
|
Accumulated Credit Losses in 2010
|
|||||||
|
Credit losses on debt securities held:
|
||||||||
|
Balance, January 1
|
$
|
10,955
|
$
|
9,411
|
||||
|
Additions related to other-than-temporary losses not previously recognized
|
400
|
1,544
|
||||||
|
Balance, December 31
|
$
|
11,355
|
$
|
10,955
|
||||
55
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 3
INVESTMENT SECURITIES continued
The following table shows the Corporation’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
Fair Value
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Less than 12 Months
|
12 Months or Longer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Temporarily Impaired Investment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities at December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
6,176
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
6,176
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
$
|
163
|
$
|
(5,572
|
)
|
163
|
(5,572
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities
|
$
|
6,176
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
163
|
$
|
(5,572
|
)
|
$
|
6,339
|
$
|
(5,588
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Temporarily Impaired Investment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities at December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
$
|
31,796
|
$
|
(745
|
)
|
$
|
31,796
|
$
|
(745
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
229,441
|
(5,892
|
)
|
$
|
154
|
229,595
|
(5,892
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
151
|
$
|
(5,674
|
)
|
151
|
(5,674
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities
|
$
|
261,237
|
$
|
(6,637
|
)
|
$
|
305
|
$
|
(5,674
|
)
|
$
|
261,542
|
$
|
(12,311
|
)
|
|||||||||
The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale and held to maturity at December 31, 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
Available for Sale
|
Held to Maturity
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amortized Cost
|
Fair Value
|
Amortized Cost
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
Maturity Distribution at December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Due in one year or less
|
$
|
4,384
|
$
|
4,456
|
$
|
1,835
|
$
|
1,835
|
||||||||
|
Due after one through five years
|
12,231
|
12,822
|
4,533
|
4,593
|
||||||||||||
|
Due after five through ten years
|
28,048
|
30,365
|
44,735
|
46,182
|
||||||||||||
|
Due after ten years
|
98,058
|
100,020
|
69,068
|
71,346
|
||||||||||||
|
$
|
142,721
|
$
|
147,663
|
$
|
120,171
|
$
|
123,956
|
|||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
358,928
|
368,998
|
307,738
|
318,513
|
||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
1,830
|
1,830
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total Investment Securities
|
$
|
503,479
|
$
|
518,491
|
$
|
427,909
|
$
|
442,469
|
||||||||
Securities with a carrying value of approximately $299,478,000, $271,091,000 and $261,691,000 were pledged at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to secure certain deposits and securities sold under repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as permitted or required by law.
Gross gains of $2,439,000, $3,636,000 and $11,158,000 in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and gross losses of $0, $230,000 and $17,000 in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were realized on sales of available for sale securities.
56
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE
The Corporation’s primary lending focus is small business and middle market commercial and residential real estate, auto and small consumer lending. The following tables show the composition of the loan portfolio, loan grades and the allowance for loan losses excluding loans held for sale. Residential real estate loans held for sale at December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, were $17,864,000 and $21,469,000, respectively.
The following table shows the composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio by loan class for the years indicated:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Loans:
|
||||||||
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
$
|
532,523
|
$
|
530,322
|
||||
|
Agricultural production financing and other loans to farmers
|
104,526
|
95,516
|
||||||
|
Real estate loans
|
||||||||
|
Construction
|
81,780
|
106,615
|
||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
1,194,230
|
1,229,037
|
||||||
|
Residential
|
481,493
|
522,051
|
||||||
|
Home Equity
|
191,631
|
201,969
|
||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and other personal expenditures
|
84,172
|
115,295
|
||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of unearned income
|
3,555
|
5,157
|
||||||
|
Other loans
|
39,505
|
29,721
|
||||||
|
2,713,415
|
2,835,683
|
|||||||
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
(70,898
|
)
|
(82,977
|
)
|
||||
|
Total Loans
|
$
|
2,642,517
|
$
|
2,752,706
|
||||
The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses to cover probable credit losses identified during its loan review process. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge offs less recoveries. All charge offs are approved by the Bank’s senior loan officers or loan committees, depending on the amount of the charge off, and are reported to the Bank’s Board of Directors. The Bank charges off loans when a determination is made that all or a portion of a loan is uncollectible. The allowance for loan losses is maintained through the provision for loan losses, which is a charge against earnings.
The amount provided for loan losses in a given period may be greater than or less than net loan losses, and is based on management’s judgment as to the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. The determination of the provision for loan losses in a given period is based on management’s continuing review and evaluation of the loan portfolio, including an internally administered loan "watch" list and an independent loan review. The evaluation takes into consideration identified credit problems, the possibility of losses inherent in the loan portfolio that are not specifically identified and management’s judgment as to the impact of current economic conditions on the portfolio.
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2011. The process for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is critical to the Corporation’s financial results. It requires management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments, as estimates about the effect of uncertain matters are needed. The allowance for loan losses considers current factors, including economic conditions and ongoing internal and external examination processes and will increase or decrease as deemed necessary to ensure the allowance for loan losses remains adequate. In addition, the allowance as a percentage of charge offs and nonperforming loans will change at different points in time based on credit performance, loan mix and collateral values.
The historical loss allocation for loans not deemed impaired according to ASC 310 is the product of the volume of loans within the non-impaired criticized and non-criticized risk grade classifications, each segmented by call code, and the historical loss factor for each respective classification and call code segment. The historical loss factors are based upon actual loss experience within each risk and call code classification. The historical look back period for non-criticized loans looks to the most recent rolling-four-quarter average and aligns with the look back period for non-impaired criticized loans. Each of the rolling four quarter periods used to obtain the average, includes all charge offs for the previous twelve-month period; therefore, the historical look back period includes seven quarters. The resulting allocation is reflective of current conditions. Criticized loans are grouped based on the risk grade assigned to the loan. Loans with a special mention grade are assigned a loss factor and loans with a classified grade, but not impaired, are assigned a separate loss factor. The loss factor computation for this allocation includes a segmented historical loss migration analysis of criticized risk grades to charge off.
In addition to the specific reserves and historical loss components of the allowance, consideration is given to various environmental factors to help ensure that losses inherent in the portfolio are reflected in the allowance for loan losses. The environmental component adjusts the historical loss allocations for commercial and consumer loans to reflect relevant current conditions that, in management’s opinion, have an impact on loss recognition. Environmental factors that management reviews in the analysis include: national and local economic trends and conditions; trends in growth in the loan portfolio and growth in higher risk areas; levels of, and trends in, delinquencies and non-accruals; experience and depth of lending management and staff; adequacy of, and adherence to, lending policies and procedures including those for underwriting; industry concentrations of credit; and adequacy of risk identification systems and controls through the internal loan review and internal audit processes.
57
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE continued
The risk characteristics of the Corporation’s material portfolio segments are as follows:
Commercial
Commercial loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.
Commercial real estate
These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral and risk grade criteria. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans.
Residential and Consumer
With respect to residential loans that are secured by 1-4 family residences and are generally owner occupied, the Corporation generally establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires PMI if that ratio is exceeded. Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in 1-4 family residences, and consumer loans are secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles. Some consumer loans are unsecured such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income and credit rating of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.
The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses by loan segment for the year ended December 31, 2011:
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
Real Estate Commercial
|
Consumer
|
Residential
|
Finance
Leases
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances, January 1
|
$
|
32,508
|
$
|
36,341
|
$
|
3,622
|
$
|
10,408
|
$
|
98
|
$
|
82,977
|
||||||||||||
|
Provision for losses
|
(13,787
|
)
|
28,574
|
(221
|
)
|
8,166
|
(102
|
)
|
22,630
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Recoveries on loans
|
8,828
|
2,811
|
942
|
1,176
|
7
|
13,764
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans charged off
|
(9,818
|
)
|
(29,807
|
)
|
(1,441
|
)
|
(7,407
|
)
|
(48,473
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Balances, December 31, 2011
|
$
|
17,731
|
$
|
37,919
|
$
|
2,902
|
$
|
12,343
|
$
|
3
|
$
|
70,898
|
||||||||||||
The following table summarize the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years indicated:
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
||||||||
|
Balance, January 1
|
$
|
92,131
|
$
|
49,543
|
||||
|
Provision for losses
|
46,483
|
122,176
|
||||||
|
Adjustment related to acquisition
|
2,040
|
|||||||
|
Recoveries on loans
|
11,935
|
7,966
|
||||||
|
Loans charged off
|
(67,572
|
)
|
(89,594
|
)
|
||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
$
|
82,977
|
$
|
92,131
|
||||
58
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE continued
The following tables show the Corporation’s allowance for credit losses and loan portfolio by loan segment for the years indicated:
|
December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Residential
|
Finance Leases
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance Balances:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
4,701
|
$
|
2,504
|
$
|
733
|
$
|
7,938
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
13,030
|
35,415
|
$
|
2,902
|
11,610
|
$
|
3
|
62,960
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Allowance for Loan Losses
|
$
|
17,731
|
$
|
37,919
|
$
|
2,902
|
$
|
12,343
|
$
|
3
|
$
|
70,898
|
||||||||||||
|
Loan Balances:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
18,793
|
$
|
51,980
|
$
|
12,546
|
$
|
83,319
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
657,760
|
1,224,031
|
$
|
84,172
|
660,578
|
$
|
3,555
|
2,630,096
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Loans
|
$
|
676,553
|
$
|
1,276,011
|
$
|
84,172
|
$
|
673,124
|
$
|
3,555
|
$
|
2,713,415
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Residential
|
Finance Leases
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance Balances:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
5,726
|
$
|
7,545
|
$
|
643
|
$
|
13,914
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
26,782
|
28,796
|
$
|
3,622
|
9,765
|
$
|
98
|
69,063
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Allowance for Loan Losses
|
$
|
32,508
|
$
|
36,341
|
$
|
3,622
|
$
|
10,408
|
$
|
98
|
$
|
82,977
|
||||||||||||
|
Loan Balances:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
28,965
|
$
|
77,705
|
$
|
9,534
|
$
|
116,204
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
626,594
|
1,257,947
|
$
|
115,295
|
714,486
|
$
|
5,157
|
2,719,479
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Loans
|
$
|
655,559
|
$
|
1,335,652
|
$
|
115,295
|
$
|
724,020
|
$
|
5,157
|
$
|
2,835,683
|
||||||||||||
Information on non-performing assets, including non-accruing, real estate owned and renegotiated loans, plus accruing loans contractually past due 90 days or more, is summarized below:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Non-Performing Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Non-accrual loans
|
$
|
69,592
|
$
|
90,591
|
||||
|
Renegotiated loans
|
14,308
|
7,139
|
||||||
|
Non-performing loans (NPL)
|
83,900
|
97,730
|
||||||
|
Real estate owned and repossessed assets
|
16,289
|
20,927
|
||||||
|
Non-performing assets (NPA)
|
100,189
|
118,657
|
||||||
|
90+ days delinquent and still accruing
|
580
|
1,330
|
||||||
|
NPAS & 90+ days delinquent
|
$
|
100,769
|
$
|
119,987
|
||||
Loans are reclassified to a non-accruing status when, in management’s judgment, the collateral value and financial condition of the borrower do not justify accruing interest. Interest previously recorded, but not deemed collectible, is reversed and charged against current income. Payments subsequently received on non-accrual loans are applied to principal. A loan is returned to accrual status when principal and interest are no longer past due and collectability is probable, typically after a minimum of six consecutive months of performance. Payments received on impaired accruing or delinquent loans are applied to interest income as accrued.
The following table summarizes the Corporation’s non-accrual loans by loan class for the years indicated:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
$
|
12,246
|
$
|
9,812
|
||||
|
Agriculture production financing and other loans
|
544
|
|||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||
|
Construction
|
8,990
|
17,164
|
||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
31,093
|
45,308
|
||||||
|
Residential
|
14,805
|
15,115
|
||||||
|
Home Equity
|
1,896
|
2,648
|
||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and other personal expenditures
|
1
|
|||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of unearned income
|
||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
561
|
|||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
69,592
|
$
|
90,591
|
||||
59
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE continued
Impaired loans include all commercial non-accrual loans and renegotiated loans as well as substandard, doubtful and loss grade loans that were still accruing but deemed impaired according to guidance set forth in ASC 310. Also included in impaired loans are accruing commercial loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more. A loan is deemed impaired when, based on current information or events, it is probable that all amounts due of principal and interest according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected.
Impaired loans are measured by the present value of expected future cash flows or the fair value of the collateral of the loans, if collateral dependent. The fair value for impaired loans is measured based on the value of the collateral securing those loans and is determined using several methods. The fair value of real estate is generally based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. The appraisers typically determine the value of the real estate by utilizing an income or market valuation approach. If an appraisal is not available, the fair value may be determined by using a cash flow analysis. Fair value on other collateral such as business assets is typically valued by using the financial information such as financial statements and aging reports provided by the borrower and is discounted as considered appropriate.
The following tables show the composition of the Corporation’s commercial impaired loans by loan class as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
December 31,2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unpaid Principal
Balance
|
Recorded
Investment
|
Related
Allowance
|
Average Recorded Investment
|
Interest Income Recognized
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and industrial
|
$
|
23,364
|
$
|
10,116
|
$
|
13,399
|
$
|
615
|
||||||||||||
|
Agriculture production financing and
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
other loans to farmers
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
14,301
|
7,701
|
8,836
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
49,242
|
34,571
|
39,032
|
591
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
7,491
|
6,185
|
6,539
|
20
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Home equity
|
4,425
|
1,241
|
1,500
|
15
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
other personal expenditures
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
unearned income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other loans
|
99
|
21
|
24
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
98,922
|
$
|
59,835
|
$
|
69,330
|
$
|
1,241
|
||||||||||||
|
Impaired loans with related allowance:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and industrial
|
$
|
8,691
|
$
|
8,104
|
$
|
4,142
|
$
|
8,196
|
$
|
174
|
||||||||||
|
Agriculture production financing and
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
other loans to farmers
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
961
|
961
|
321
|
961
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
12,115
|
8,748
|
2,183
|
10,028
|
140
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
1,888
|
1,575
|
391
|
1,687
|
7
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Home equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
other personal expenditures
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
unearned income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other loans
|
579
|
552
|
559
|
590
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
24,234
|
$
|
19,940
|
$
|
7,596
|
$
|
21,462
|
$
|
321
|
||||||||||
|
Total Impaired Loans
|
$
|
123,156
|
$
|
79,775
|
$
|
7,596
|
$
|
90,792
|
$
|
1,562
|
||||||||||
60
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE continued
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||
|
Unpaid Principal
Balance
|
Recorded
Investment
|
Related Allowance
|
||||||||||
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial and industrial
|
$
|
30,006
|
$
|
16,572
|
||||||||
|
Agriculture production financing and
|
||||||||||||
|
other loans to farmers
|
966
|
530
|
||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
12,598
|
9,150
|
||||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
64,064
|
43,653
|
||||||||||
|
Residential
|
7,909
|
5,153
|
||||||||||
|
Home equity
|
4,460
|
1,245
|
||||||||||
|
Other loans
|
101
|
14
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
120,104
|
$
|
76,317
|
||||||||
|
Impaired loans with related allowance:
|
||||||||||||
|
Commercial and industrial
|
$
|
11,477
|
$
|
11,374
|
$
|
5,250
|
||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
9,353
|
7,824
|
2,049
|
|||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
17,984
|
17,076
|
5,496
|
|||||||||
|
Residential
|
2,740
|
2,691
|
465
|
|||||||||
|
Home equity
|
458
|
446
|
178
|
|||||||||
|
Other loans
|
476
|
476
|
476
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
42,488
|
$
|
39,887
|
$
|
13,914
|
||||||
|
Total Impaired Loans
|
$
|
162,592
|
$
|
116,204
|
$
|
13,914
|
||||||
In addition to the impaired loans outlined above, the Corporation has identified $3,544,000 in non-accrual residential mortgage loans which have been deemed impaired in accordance with ASC 310. Specific reserves totaling $342,000 have been set on nine of these loans with a total principal balance of $1,104,000.
As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to: (i) the level of criticized commercial loans, (ii) net charge offs, (iii) non-performing loans and (iv) the general national and local economic conditions.
61
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE continued
The Corporation utilizes a risk grading of pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss to assess the overall credit quality of large commercial loans. All large commercial credit grades are reviewed at a minimum of once a year for pass grade loans. Loans with grades below pass are reviewed more frequently depending on the grade. A description of the general characteristics of these grades is as follows:
|
|
●
|
Pass – Loans that are considered to be of acceptable credit quality.
|
|
|
●
|
Special Mention – Loans which possess some credit deficiency or potential weakness, which deserves close attention. A special mention asset has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Corporation’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose the Corporation to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. Such loans pose an unwarranted financial risk that, if not corrected, could weaken the loan adversely impacting the future repayment ability of the borrower. The key distinctions of this category’s classification are that it is indicative of an unwarranted level of risk; and weaknesses are considered “potential”, not “defined”, impairments to the primary source of repayment. Examples include businesses that may be suffering from inadequate management, loss of key personnel or significant customer or litigation.
|
|
|
●
|
Substandard – A substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified have a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Corporation will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Other characteristics may include:
|
|
|
o
|
the likelihood that a loan will be paid from the primary source of repayment is uncertain or financial deterioration is underway and very close attention is warranted to ensure that the loan is collected without loss,
|
|
|
o
|
the primary source of repayment is gone, and the Corporation is forced to rely on a secondary source of repayment, such as collateral liquidation or guarantees,
|
|
|
o
|
loans have a distinct possibility that the Corporation will sustain some loss if deficiencies are not corrected,
|
|
|
o
|
unusual courses of action are needed to maintain a high probability of repayment,
|
|
|
o
|
the borrower is not generating enough cash flow to repay loan principal; however, it continues to make interest payments,
|
|
|
o
|
the Corporation is forced into a subordinated or unsecured position due to flaws in documentation,
|
|
|
o
|
loans have been restructured so that payment schedules, terms and collateral represent concessions to the borrower when compared to the normal loan terms,
|
|
|
o
|
the Corporation is seriously contemplating foreclosure or legal action due to the apparent deterioration of the loan, and
|
|
|
o
|
there is significant deterioration in market conditions to which the borrower is highly vulnerable.
|
|
|
●
|
Doubtful – Loans that have all of the weaknesses of those classified as Substandard. However, based on currently existing facts, conditions and values, these weaknesses make full collection of principal highly questionable and improbable. Other credit characteristics may include the primary source of repayment is gone or there is considerable doubt as to the quality of the secondary sources of repayment. The possibility of loss is high, but because of certain important pending factors that may strengthen the loan, loss classification is deferred until the exact status of repayment is known.
|
|
|
●
|
Loss – Loans that are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuing to carry them as an asset is not warranted. Loans will be classified as Loss when it is neither practical not desirable to defer writing off or reserving all or a portion of a basically worthless asset, even though partial recovery may be possible at some time in the future.
|
62
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE continued
The following tables summarize the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, by loan class for the years indicated. Consumer Non-Performing loans include accruing consumer loans 90 plus days delinquent and consumer non-accrual loans. The entire balance of a loan is considered delinquent if the minimum payment contractually required to be made is not received by the specified date.
|
December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial Pass
|
Commercial Special Mention
|
Commercial Substandard
|
Commercial Doubtful
|
Commercial Loss
|
Consumer Performing
|
Consumer
Non Performing
|
Total Loans
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
$
|
478,885
|
$
|
22,405
|
$
|
28,025
|
$
|
3,208
|
$
|
532,523
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Agriculture production financing and
other loans
|
101,289
|
1,582
|
1,655
|
104,526
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
47,611
|
3,672
|
22,376
|
$
|
7,762
|
$
|
359
|
81,780
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
1,033,397
|
54,697
|
103,330
|
1,724
|
1,035
|
47
|
1,194,230
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
139,237
|
9,175
|
16,699
|
500
|
308,306
|
7,576
|
481,493
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home Equity
|
15,912
|
499
|
3,317
|
170,776
|
1,127
|
191,631
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and
other personal expenditures
|
84,121
|
51
|
84,172
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of
unearned income
|
3,555
|
3,555
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
38,917
|
15
|
21
|
552
|
39,505
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,855,248
|
$
|
92,045
|
$
|
175,423
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
$
|
575,555
|
$
|
9,160
|
$
|
2,713,415
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial Pass
|
Commercial Special Mention
|
Commercial Substandard
|
Commercial Doubtful
|
Commercial Loss
|
Consumer Performing
|
Consumer
Non Performing
|
Total Loans
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
$
|
454,305
|
$
|
19,928
|
$
|
53,199
|
$
|
2,870
|
$
|
20
|
$
|
530,322
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Agriculture production financing and
other loans
|
92,293
|
574
|
2,649
|
95,516
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
66,918
|
10,100
|
28,167
|
1,430
|
106,615
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
1,038,861
|
38,676
|
146,213
|
5,287
|
1,229,037
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
144,163
|
9,220
|
18,747
|
1,169
|
$
|
340,932
|
$
|
7,820
|
522,051
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home Equity
|
17,913
|
283
|
2,872
|
524
|
178,470
|
1,907
|
201,969
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and
other personal expenditures
|
115,239
|
56
|
115,295
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of
unearned income
|
280
|
18
|
4,859
|
5,157
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
27,642
|
1,295
|
784
|
29,721
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,842,375
|
$
|
80,076
|
$
|
252,649
|
$
|
11,280
|
$
|
20
|
$
|
639,500
|
$
|
9,783
|
$
|
2,835,683
|
||||||||||||||||
63
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE continued
The following tables show a past due aging of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, by loan class, for the years indicated:
|
December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current
|
30-59 Days Past Due
|
60-89 Days Past Due
|
Loans > 90 Days And Accruing
|
Non-
Accrual
|
Total Past
Due & Non-Accrual
|
Total Loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
$
|
518,764
|
$
|
1,332
|
$
|
135
|
$
|
46
|
$
|
12,246
|
$
|
13,759
|
$
|
532,523
|
||||||||||||||
|
Agriculture production financing and other loans
|
104,464
|
62
|
62
|
104,526
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
69,305
|
328
|
3,126
|
31
|
8,990
|
12,475
|
81,780
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
1,140,897
|
16,457
|
5,783
|
31,093
|
53,333
|
1,194,230
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
458,925
|
5,485
|
2,087
|
191
|
14,805
|
22,568
|
481,493
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home Equity
|
187,788
|
1,096
|
590
|
261
|
1,896
|
3,843
|
191,631
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and other personal
expenditures
|
82,837
|
1,075
|
208
|
51
|
1
|
1,335
|
84,172
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of unearned income
|
3,555
|
3,555
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
38,944
|
561
|
561
|
39,505
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,605,479
|
$
|
25,835
|
$
|
11,929
|
$
|
580
|
$
|
69,592
|
$
|
107,936
|
$
|
2,713,415
|
||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current
|
30-59 Days Past Due
|
60-89 Days Past Due
|
Loans > 90 Days And Accruing
|
Non-
Accrual
|
Total Past
Due & Non-Accrual
|
Total Loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
$
|
518,683
|
$
|
1,477
|
$
|
211
|
$
|
139
|
$
|
9,812
|
$
|
11,639
|
$
|
530,322
|
||||||||||||||
|
Agriculture production financing and other loans
|
94,972
|
544
|
544
|
95,516
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
86,710
|
1,543
|
996
|
202
|
17,164
|
19,905
|
106,615
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
1,171,580
|
6,769
|
5,380
|
45,308
|
57,457
|
1,229,037
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
498,066
|
5,261
|
3,363
|
246
|
15,115
|
23,985
|
522,051
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home Equity
|
196,276
|
1,825
|
534
|
686
|
2,648
|
5,693
|
201,969
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and other personal
expenditures
|
112,760
|
1,989
|
489
|
57
|
2,535
|
115,295
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of unearned income
|
5,157
|
5,157
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
29,721
|
29,721
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,713,925
|
$
|
18,864
|
$
|
10,973
|
$
|
1,330
|
$
|
90,591
|
$
|
121,758
|
$
|
2,835,683
|
||||||||||||||
See the information regarding the analysis of loan loss experience in the “LOAN QUALITY/PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Given recent economic conditions, borrowers of all types are experiencing declines in income and cash flow. As a result, borrowers are occasionally seeking to reduce contractual cash outlays including debt payments. Concurrently, in an effort to preserve and protect its earning assets, specifically troubled loans, the Corporation is working to maintain its relationship with certain customers who are experiencing financial difficulty by contractually modifying the borrower’s debt agreement with the Corporation. In certain loan restructuring situations, the Corporation may grant a concession to a debtor experiencing financial difficulty, resulting in a trouble debt restructuring. A concession is deemed to be granted when, as a result of the restructuring, the Corporation does not expect to collect all amounts due, including interest accrued at the original contract rate. If the payment of principal at original maturity is primarily dependent on the value of collateral, the current value of the collateral is considered in determining whether the principal will be paid.
64
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE continued
The following tables summarize troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the period ended December 31, 2011:
|
Pre-Modification
|
Post-Modification
|
Number
|
||||||||||
|
Recorded Balance
|
Recorded Balance
|
of Loans
|
||||||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
$
|
4,023
|
$
|
4,033
|
17
|
|||||||
|
Agriculture production financing and other loans
|
||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
791
|
726
|
5
|
|||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
17,297
|
15,260
|
19
|
|||||||||
|
Residential
|
6,892
|
7,076
|
52
|
|||||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and other personal expenditures
|
90
|
94
|
9
|
|||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
12
|
12
|
1
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
29,105
|
$
|
27,201
|
103
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Term
|
Rate
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
Modification
|
Modification
|
Combination
|
Modification
|
|||||||||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
$
|
3,816
|
$
|
118
|
$
|
3,934
|
||||||||||
|
Agriculture production financing and other loans
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
581
|
$
|
125
|
17
|
723
|
|||||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
10,338
|
954
|
2,810
|
14,102
|
||||||||||||
|
Residential
|
5,610
|
99
|
1,022
|
6,731
|
||||||||||||
|
Home Equity
|
55
|
34
|
89
|
|||||||||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and other personal expenditures
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Lease financing receivables, net of unearned income
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Other Loans
|
12
|
12
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
20,412
|
$
|
1,178
|
$
|
4,001
|
$
|
25,591
|
||||||||
Loans secured by commercial and farm real estate made up 57 percent of the post-modification balances of the troubled debt restructured loans in the twelve months ending December 31, 2011. The second largest class of troubled debt restructurings in 2011 was residential real estate loans, including home equity, accounting for 26 percent of the total.
The following table summarizes troubled debt restructures that occurred between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011, that subsequently defaulted during the period:
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
||||||||
|
December 31, 2011
|
||||||||
|
Number of Loans
|
Recorded Balance
|
|||||||
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
3
|
$
|
471
|
|||||
|
Agriculture production financing and other loans
|
||||||||
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||
|
Commercial and farm land
|
3
|
1,951
|
||||||
|
Residential
|
7
|
557
|
||||||
|
Individuals loans for household and other personal expenditures
|
1
|
5
|
||||||
|
Other
|
||||||||
|
Total
|
14
|
$
|
2,984
|
|||||
For potential consumer loan restructures, impairment evaluation occurs prior to modification. Any subsequent impairment is typically addressed through the charge off process, or may be addressed through a specific reserve. Consumer troubled debt restructurings are generally included in the general historical allowance for loan loss at the post modification balance. Consumer non-accrual and delinquent troubled debt restructurings are also considered in the calculation of the non-accrual and delinquency trend environmental allowance allocation. Commercial troubled debt restructured loans risk graded special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss are individually evaluated for impairment under ASC 310. Any resulting specific reserves are included in the allowance for loan losses. Commercial 30 – 89 day delinquent troubled debt restructurings are included in the calculation of the delinquency trend environmental allowance allocation. All commercial non-impaired loans, including non-accrual and 90+ day delinquents, are included in the ASC 450 loss migration analysis.
65
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 5
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Cost at December 31:
|
||||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
14,296
|
$
|
14,296
|
||||
|
Buildings and Leasehold Improvements
|
62,317
|
60,736
|
||||||
|
Equipment
|
39,789
|
44,308
|
||||||
|
Total Cost
|
116,402
|
119,340
|
||||||
|
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
|
(65,389
|
)
|
(66,890
|
)
|
||||
|
Net
|
$
|
51,013
|
$
|
52,450
|
||||
The Corporation is committed under various noncancelable lease contracts for certain subsidiary office facilities and equipment. Total lease expense for 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $2,636,000, $2,801,000 and $2,555,000, respectively. The future minimum rental commitments required under the operating leases in effect at December 31, 2011, expiring at various dates through the year 2018 are as follows for the years ending December 31:
|
2012
|
$
|
2,273
|
||
|
2013
|
1,938
|
|||
|
2014
|
1,740
|
|||
|
2015
|
1,534
|
|||
|
2016
|
1,166
|
|||
|
After 2016
|
741
|
|||
|
Total Future Minimum Obligations
|
$
|
9,392
|
NOTE 6
GOODWILL
The carrying amount of goodwill at December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $141,357,000 respectively. No impairment loss was recorded in 2011 and 2010. The impact of deteriorating economic conditions has significantly impacted the banking industry in 2010 and 2011 and has impacted the financial results of the Corporation. The Corporation tested goodwill for impairment during 2010 and 2011. In both valuations, the fair value exceeded the Corporation’s carrying value; therefore, it was concluded goodwill is not impaired. For additional details related to impairment testing, see the “GOODWILL” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
NOTE 7
CORE DEPOSIT AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
The carrying basis and accumulated amortization of recognized core deposit and other intangibles at December 31 were:
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Gross carrying amount
|
$
|
45,422
|
$
|
45,422
|
||||
|
Accumulated amortization
|
(36,308
|
)
|
(32,760
|
)
|
||||
|
Core Deposit and Other Intangibles
|
$
|
9,114
|
$
|
12,662
|
||||
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was $3,548,000, $4,721,000 and $5,109,000, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the following five years is:
|
2012
|
$
|
1,858
|
||
|
2013
|
1,441
|
|||
|
2014
|
1,437
|
|||
|
2015
|
1,437
|
|||
|
2016
|
1,399
|
|||
|
After 2016
|
1,542
|
|||
|
$
|
9,114
|
66
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 8
DEPOSITS
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Demand Deposits
|
$
|
1,438,513
|
$
|
1,362,927
|
||||
|
Savings Deposits
|
757,166
|
763,949
|
||||||
|
Certificates and Other Time Deposits of $100,000 or more
|
264,787
|
334,748
|
||||||
|
Other Certificates and Time Deposits
|
551,247
|
661,569
|
||||||
|
Brokered Deposits
|
122,942
|
145,687
|
||||||
|
Total Deposits
|
$
|
3,134,655
|
$
|
3,268,880
|
||||
|
Certificates and Other Time Deposits Maturing in Years Ending December 31:
|
||||
|
2012
|
$
|
519,025
|
||
|
2013
|
274,365
|
|||
|
2014
|
70,387
|
|||
|
2015
|
33,814
|
|||
|
2016
|
39,530
|
|||
|
After 2016
|
1,855
|
|||
|
$
|
938,976
|
|||
NOTE 9
BORROWINGS
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements
|
$
|
156,305
|
$
|
109,871
|
||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
|
138,095
|
82,684
|
||||||
|
Subordinated Debentures and Term Loans
|
194,974
|
226,440
|
||||||
|
Total Borrowings
|
$
|
489,374
|
$
|
418,995
|
||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements consist of obligations of the Bank to other parties. The obligations are secured by U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprise obligations. The maximum amount of outstanding agreements at any month-end during 2011 and 2010 totaled $162,315,000 and $117,571,000, respectively, and the average of such agreements totaled $120,415,000 and $107,573,000 during 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Included in the outstanding balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances are $48,000,000 and $51,000,000 of putable advances as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 respectively. Maturities of securities sold under repurchase agreements; Federal Home Loan Bank advances
,
subordinated debentures and term loans as of December 31, 2011, are as follows:
|
Maturities in Years Ending December 31:
|
Securities Sold
Under Repurchase Agreements
|
Federal Home
Loan Bank
Advances
|
Subordinated
Debentures and
Term Loans
|
|||||||||
|
2012
|
$
|
146,305
|
$
|
49,785
|
$
|
79,148
|
||||||
|
2013
|
217
|
|||||||||||
|
2014
|
10,000
|
26,207
|
||||||||||
|
2015
|
27,000
|
55,000
|
||||||||||
|
2016
|
29,009
|
|||||||||||
|
After 2016
|
5,877
|
60,826
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
156,305
|
$
|
138,095
|
$
|
194,974
|
|||||||
67
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 9
BORROWINGS continued
The terms of a security agreement with the FHLB require the Corporation to pledge, as collateral for advances, qualifying first mortgage loans, investment securities and multifamily loans in an amount equal to at least 155 percent of these advances depending on the type of collateral pledged. Advances, with interest rates from 0.86 to 6.81 percent, are subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of prepayment. The total available remaining borrowing capacity from the FHLB at December 31, 2011, was $94,812,000.
Subordinated Debentures and Term Loans
. Five borrowings were outstanding on December 31, 2011, for $194,974,000.
|
|
●
|
First Merchants Capital Trust III
. The Corporation entered into a junior subordinated debenture on June 30, 2010 for $47,835,000, subsequent to an Exchange Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) whereby the Treasury exchanged 46,400 shares of the Corporation’s Preferred Stock for 46,400 shares of trust preferred securities, issued by First Merchants Capital Trust III. The Trust used 46,400 shares of tendered preferred stock and $1.4 million in proceeds from the sale of Common Securities to the Corporation to purchase the debentures. On September 22, 2011, the Corporation redeemed the Capital Securities and Debentures pursuant to a Repurchase Letter agreement with the Treasury. For more information related to this debt repayment, see Note 15. Regulatory Capital, Equity Offering and Capital Purchase Program in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
●
|
First Merchants Capital Trust II
. The subordinated debenture, entered into on July 2, 2007, for $56,702,000 will mature on September 15, 2037. The Corporation may redeem the debenture no earlier than September 15, 2012, subject to the prior approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as required by law or regulation. Interest is fixed at 6.495 percent for the period from the date of issuance through September 15, 2012, and thereafter, at an annual floating rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 1.56 percent, reset quarterly. Interest is payable in March, June, September and December of each year. The Corporation holds all of the outstanding common securities of First Merchants Capital Trust II.
|
|
|
●
|
CNBC Statutory Trust I
. As part of the March 1, 2003, acquisition of CNBC Bancorp, the Corporation assumed $4,124,000 of a junior subordinated debenture entered into on February 22, 2001. The subordinated debenture of $4,124,000 will mature on February 22, 2031. Interest is fixed at 10.2 percent and payable on February 22 and August 22 of each year. The Corporation may redeem the debenture, in whole or in part, at its option commencing February 22, 2011, at a redemption price of 105.1 percent of the outstanding principal amount and, thereafter, at a premium which declines annually. On or after February 22, 2021, the securities may be redeemed at face value with prior approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation holds all of the outstanding common securities of CNBC Statutory Trust I.
|
|
|
●
|
Bank of America, N.A.
The Corporation currently has a $55 million credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. comprised of (a) a term loan in the principal amount of $5 million (the “Term Loan”) and (b) a subordinated debenture in the principal amount of $50 million (the “Subordinated Debt”). Pursuant to the terms of the underlying Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), the Term Loan and the Subordinated Debt each mature on February 15, 2015. The Term Loan is secured by a pledge of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Bank.
The Loan Agreement contains certain customary representations and warranties and financial and negative covenants. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the Loan Agreement. At December 31, 2011, the Corporation failed to meet the minimum return on average total assets covenant of 0.75 percent.
The Loan Agreement provides that upon an event of default as the result of the Corporation’s failure to comply with a financial covenant, Bank of America may (a) declare the $5 million outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan immediately due and payable, (b) exercise all of its rights and remedies at law, in equity and/or pursuant to any or all collateral documents, including foreclosing on the collateral if payment of the Term Loan is not made in full, and (c) add a default rate of 3 percent per annum to the Term Loan. Because the Subordinated Debt is treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes, the Loan Agreement does not provide Bank of America with any right of acceleration or other remedies with regard to the Subordinated Debt upon an event of default caused by the Corporation’s breach of a financial covenant. To date, Bank of America has chosen to apply the default rate, but not to accelerate the Term Loan based on the Corporation’s failure to meet these financial covenants.
|
|
|
●
|
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
. On March 31, 2009, the Bank, entered into $79,000,000 of 2.625 percent Senior Notes (the “Notes”) due on March 30, 2012 through a pooled offering. Including the FDIC fee, underwriting, legal and accounting expenses, the effective rate is 3.812 percent. The Notes are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation under its Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. The Notes are issued by the Bank and are not an obligation of, or guaranteed by, the Corporation. In connection with the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, the Bank entered into a Master Agreement with the FDIC on January 16, 2009. The Master Agreement contains, among other things, certain terms and conditions that must be included in the governing documents for any senior debt securities issued by the Bank that is guaranteed pursuant to the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.
|
68
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 9
BORROWINGS continued
Subordinated Debentures and Term Loans
. Six borrowings were outstanding on December 31, 2010, for $226,440,000.
|
|
●
|
First Merchants Capital Trust III
. The Corporation entered into a junior subordinated debenture on June 30, 2010 for $47,835,000. The Corporation may redeem the debenture, in whole or in part, at its option while the Capital Securities or this Security are held by the United States Department of the Treasury in conjunction with Troubled Asset Relief Program assistance provided to the Corporation, or at any time on or after June 30, 2015, subject to the prior approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as required by law or regulation. Interest is fixed at 5.00 percent for the period from the date of issuance through February 19, 2014, and thereafter, at a fixed rate of 9 percent. Interest is payable in February, May, August and November of each year. The Corporation holds all of the outstanding common securities of First Merchants Capital Trust III.
|
|
|
●
|
First Merchants Capital Trust II
. The subordinated debenture, entered into on July 2, 2007, for $56,702,000 will mature on September 15, 2037. The Corporation may redeem the debenture no earlier than September 15, 2012, subject to the prior approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as required by law or regulation. Interest is fixed at 6.495 percent for the period from the date of issuance through September 15, 2012, and thereafter, at an annual floating rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 1.56 percent, reset quarterly. Interest is payable in March, June, September and December of each year. The Corporation holds all of the outstanding common securities of First Merchants Capital Trust II.
|
|
|
●
|
CNBC Statutory Trust I
. As part of the March 1, 2003, acquisition of CNBC Bancorp, the Corporation assumed $4,124,000 of a junior subordinated debenture entered into on February 22, 2001. The subordinated debenture of $4,124,000 will mature on February 22, 2031. Interest is fixed at 10.2 percent and payable on February 22 and August 22 of each year. The Corporation may redeem the debenture, in whole or in part, at its option commencing February 22, 2011, at a redemption price of 105.1 percent of the outstanding principal amount and, thereafter, at a premium which declines annually. On or after February 22, 2021, the securities may be redeemed at face value with prior approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation holds all of the outstanding common securities of CNBC Statutory Trust I.
|
|
|
●
|
Bank of America, N.A.
The Corporation currently has a $55 million credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. comprised of (a) a term loan in the principal amount of $5 million (the “Term Loan”) and (b) a subordinated debenture in the principal amount of $50 million (the “Subordinated Debt”). Pursuant to the terms of the underlying Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), the Term Loan and the Subordinated Debt each mature on February 15, 2015. The Term Loan is secured by a pledge of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Bank.
The Loan Agreement contains certain customary representations and warranties and financial and negative covenants. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the Loan Agreement. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation failed to meet the minimum return on average total assets covenant of 0.75 percent.
The Loan Agreement provides that upon an event of default as the result of the Corporation’s failure to comply with a financial covenant, Bank of America may (a) declare the $5 million outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan immediately due and payable, (b) exercise all of its rights and remedies at law, in equity and/or pursuant to any or all collateral documents, including foreclosing on the collateral if payment of the Term Loan is not made in full, and (c) add a default rate of 3 percent per annum to the Term Loan. Because the Subordinated Debt is treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes, the Loan Agreement does not provide Bank of America with any right of acceleration or other remedies with regard to the Subordinated Debt upon an event of default caused by the Corporation’s breach of a financial covenant. To date, Bank of America has chosen to apply the default rate, but not to accelerate the Term Loan based on the Corporation’s failure to meet these financial covenants.
|
|
|
●
|
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
. On March 31, 2009, the Bank, entered into $79,000,000 of 2.625 percent Senior Notes (the “Notes”) due on March 30, 2012 through a pooled offering. Including the FDIC fee, underwriting, legal and accounting expenses, the effective rate is 3.812 percent. The Notes are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation under its Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. The Notes are issued by the Bank and are not an obligation of, or guaranteed by, the Corporation. In connection with the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, the Bank entered into a Master Agreement with the FDIC on January 16, 2009. The Master Agreement contains, among other things, certain terms and conditions that must be included in the governing documents for any senior debt securities issued by the Bank that is guaranteed pursuant to the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.
|
69
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 10
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Corporation is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Corporation principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Corporation manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities and through the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Corporation enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Corporation’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Corporation’s known or expected cash payments principally related to certain variable-rate liabilities. The Corporation also has derivatives that are a result of a service the Corporation provides to certain qualifying customers, and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk in the Corporation’s assets or liabilities. The Corporation manages a matched book with respect to its derivative instruments offered as a part of this service to its customers in order to minimize its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of the Corporation’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
Asset Derivatives
|
Liability Derivatives
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2011
|
December 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2011
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate contracts
|
Other Assets |
$
|
424
|
Other Assets |
$
|
1,393
|
Other Liabilities |
$
|
2,305
|
Other Liabilities | |||||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate contracts
|
Other Assets |
$
|
5,241
|
Other Assets |
$
|
3,718
|
Other Liabilities |
$
|
5,492
|
Other Liabilities |
$
|
3,876
|
|||||||
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Corporation’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Corporation primarily uses interest rate swaps and interest rate caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the payment of fixed amounts to a counterparty in exchange for the Corporation receiving variable payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up front premium. As of December 31, 2011, the Corporation had two interest rate swaps with a notional of $26 million and one interest rate cap with a notional of $13 million that were designated as cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2010, the Corporation had one interest rate swap with a notional of $13 million and one interest rate cap with a notional of $13 million that were designated as cash flow hedges.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During 2011, such derivatives were used to hedge the forecasted variable cash outflows (LIBOR-based) associated with existing trust preferred securities when the outflows convert from a fixed rate to variable rate in September 2012. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Corporation did not recognize any ineffectiveness.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Corporation’s variable-rate liabilities. During the next twelve months, the Corporation does not expect to reclassify any amounts from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest.
Non-designated Hedges
The Corporation does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and result from a service the Corporation provides to certain customers. The Corporation executes interest rate swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting interest rate swaps that the Corporation executes with a third party, such that the Corporation minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized directly in earnings. As of December 31, 2011, the notional amount of customer-facing swaps was approximately $111,191,000. This amount is offset with third party counterparties, as described above. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Corporation recognized a net loss of $94,000 and $134,000, respectively, related to the changes in fair value of these swaps.
70
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 10
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES continued
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Income Statement
The tables below present the effect of the Corporation’s derivative financial instruments on the Income Statement for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
Derivatives in Cash
Flow Hedging
Relationships
|
Location of Gain
(Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income (Effective
Portion) for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2011
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income (Effective
Portion) for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2010
|
|||
|
Interest Rate Products
|
Interest Income
|
|||||
|
Other Income
|
$
|
442
|
||||
|
$
|
442
|
|||||
|
Derivatives Not
Designated as Hedging
Instruments under
FASB ASC 815-10
|
Location of Gain
(Loss) Recognized
in
Income on Derivative
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2011
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2010
|
|||||
|
Interest Rate Contracts
|
Other income
|
$
|
(94
|
)
|
$
|
(134
|
)
|
|
The Corporation’s exposure to credit risk occurs because of nonperformance by its counterparties. The counterparties approved by the Corporation are usually financial institutions, which are well capitalized and have credit ratings through Moody’s and/or Standard & Poor’s, at or above investment grade. The Corporation’s control of such risk is through quarterly financial reviews, comparing mark-to-market values with policy limitations, credit ratings and collateral pledging.
Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features
The Corporation has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Corporation fails to maintain its status as a well/adequate capitalized institution, then the Corporation could be required to terminate or fully collateralize all outstanding derivative contracts.
The Corporation has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Corporation defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Corporation could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
As of December 31, 2011, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position related to these agreements was $7,949,000. As of December 31, 2011, the Corporation has minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and has posted collateral of $6,456,000. If the Corporation had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2011, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value.
NOTE 11
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Corporation used fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments, to certain assets, and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. The accounting guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies only when other guidance requires or permits assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value; it does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances.
As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. It represents an exit price at the measurement date. Market participants are buyers and sellers, who are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact in the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset or liability being measured. Current market conditions, including imbalances between supply and demand, are considered in determining fair value. The Corporation values its assets and liabilities in the principal market where it sells the particular asset or transfers the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity. In the absence of a principal market, the valuation is based on the most advantageous market for the asset or liability (i.e., the market where the asset could be sold or the liability transferred at a price that maximizes the amount to be received for the asset or minimizes the amount to be paid to transfer the liability).
71
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 11
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS continued
Valuation inputs refer to the assumptions market participants would use in pricing a given asset or liability. Inputs can be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs are those assumptions which market participants would use in pricing the particular asset or liability. These inputs are based on market data and are obtained from a source independent of the Corporation. Unobservable inputs are assumptions based on the Corporation’s own information or estimate of assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are based on the best and most current information available on the measurement date. All inputs, whether observable or unobservable, are ranked in accordance with a prescribed fair value hierarchy which gives the highest ranking to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest ranking to unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market activity (Level 3). Fair values for assets or liabilities classified as Level 2 are based on one or a combination of the following factors: (i) quoted prices for similar assets; (ii) observable inputs for the asset or liability, such as interest rates or yield curves; or (iii) inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Corporation considers an input to be significant if it drives 10 percent or more of the total fair value of a particular asset or liability.
Assets and liabilities are considered to be fair valued on a recurring basis if fair value is measured regularly (i.e., daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly). Recurring valuation occurs at a minimum on the measurement date. Assets and liabilities are considered to be fair valued on a nonrecurring basis if the fair value measurement of the instrument does not necessarily result in a change in the amount recorded on the balance sheet. Generally, nonrecurring valuation is the result of the application of other accounting pronouncements which require assets or liabilities to be assessed for impairment or recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of assets or liabilities transferred in or out of Level 3 is measured on the transfer date, with any additional changes in fair value subsequent to the transfer considered to be realized or unrealized gains or losses.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Investment Securities
Where quoted, market prices are available in an active market and securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. There are no securities classified within Level 1 of the hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. Level 2 securities include agencies, government-sponsored mortgage backs, state and municipal and equity securities. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy and include state and municipal, corporate obligations and equity securities. Level 3 fair value on state and municipal, corporate obligations and equity securities was determined using a discounted cash flow model that incorporated market estimates of interest rates and volatility in markets that have not been active.
Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply such techniques as matrix pricing to determine the value of identical or similar investment securities (Level 2). Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique widely used in the banking industry to value investment securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for specific investment securities but rather relying on the investment securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted investment securities. Any investment security not valued based upon the methods above are considered Level 3.
Corporate Obligations
The pooled trust preferred securities in the portfolio fall within the scope of ASC 325-10 (formerly EITF 99-20) and include $5.7 million amortized cost, with a fair value of $163,000. These securities were rated A or better at inception, but at December 31, 2011, Moody’s ratings on these securities range from Ca to C. The issuers in these securities are primarily banks, but some of the pools do include a limited number of insurance companies. The Corporation uses an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) evaluation process to compare the present value of expected cash flows to determine whether an adverse change in cash flows has occurred. The OTTI process considers the structure and term of the collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the process details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the process include expected future default rates and prepayments as well as recovery assumptions on defaults and deferrals. In addition, the process is used to “stress” each CDO, or make assumptions more severe than expected activity, to determine the degree to which assumptions could deteriorate before the CDO could no longer fully support repayment of the Corporation’s note class. For 2011, OTTI losses were $2.8 million, of which $400,000 was recorded as expense and an unrealized gain of $2.4 million was recorded in other comprehensive income.
72
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 11
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS continued
Interest Rate Derivative Agreements
See information regarding the Corporation’s interest rate derivative products in Note 10. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The fair value is estimated by a third party using inputs that are primarily unobservable and cannot be corroborated by observable market data and, therefore, are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
In 2011, approximately, $18,711,000 was transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 due to limited availability of similar securities in active markets. Additionally, the Corporation transferred $97.3 million of selected state and municipal securities from available for sale to held to maturity. These securities are valued at amortized cost and are no longer classified within the fair value hierarchy. All securities were previously classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the ASC 820-10 fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
| Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2011
|
Fair Value
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities
|
$
|
117
|
$
|
117
|
||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
147,353
|
126,712
|
$
|
20,641
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
368,998
|
368,998
|
||||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
193
|
193
|
||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
1,830
|
1,826
|
4
|
|||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swap asset
|
5,241
|
5,241
|
||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate cap
|
424
|
424
|
||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swap liability
|
(7,797
|
)
|
(7,797
|
)
|
||||||||||||
| Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
Fair Value
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities
|
$
|
616
|
$
|
616
|
||||||||||||
|
State and municipal
|
239,990
|
239,990
|
||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
|
295,317
|
295,317
|
||||||||||||||
|
Corporate obligations
|
182
|
$
|
182
|
|||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
3,265
|
3,261
|
4
|
|||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swap asset
|
4,002
|
4,002
|
||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate cap
|
1,109
|
1,109
|
||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swap liability
|
(3,876
|
)
|
(3,876
|
)
|
||||||||||||
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of recurring fair value measurements recognized in the accompanying balance sheet using significant unobservable Level 3 inputs for year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Available for
Sale Securities
|
Interest Rate
Swap Asset
|
Interest
Rate Cap
|
Interest Rate
Swap Liability
|
|||||||||||||
|
Beginning Balance
|
$
|
186
|
$
|
4,002
|
$
|
1,109
|
$
|
(3,876
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total realized and unrealized gains and losses
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Included in net income
|
(400
|
)
|
3,827
|
(3,921
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
2,029
|
(2,588
|
)
|
(685
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Transfers in/(out) of Level 3
|
18,711
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Principal payments
|
312
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Ending balance
|
$
|
20,838
|
$
|
5,241
|
$
|
424
|
$
|
(7,797
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Available for
Sale Securities
|
Interest Rate
Swap Asset
|
Interest
Rate Cap
|
Interest Rate
Swap Liability
|
|||||||||||||
|
Beginning Balance
|
$
|
2,483
|
$
|
2,624
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Total realized and unrealized gains and losses
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Included in net income
|
(1,544
|
)
|
1,094
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
(1,081
|
)
|
284
|
$
|
158
|
|||||||||||
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
951
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Transfers in/(out) of Level 3
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Principal payments
|
328
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Ending balance
|
$
|
186
|
$
|
4,002
|
$
|
1,109
|
$
|
(3,876
|
)
|
|||||||
73
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 11
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS continued
Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy for year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2011
|
Fair Value
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
|
Impaired Loans
|
$
|
22,885
|
$
|
22,885
|
||||||||||||
|
Other real estate owned (collateral dependent)
|
$
|
7,882
|
$
|
7,882
|
||||||||||||
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
Fair Value
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
|
Impaired Loans
|
$
|
45,432
|
$
|
45,432
|
||||||||||||
|
Other real estate owned (collateral dependent)
|
$
|
6,314
|
$
|
6,314
|
||||||||||||
Impaired Loans (collateral dependent) and Other Real Estate Owned
Loan impairment is reported when substantial doubt about the collectability of scheduled payments exists. Impaired loans are carried at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate, or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to increase, such increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of the loan is confirmed. During 2011, certain impaired loans were partially charged off or re-evaluated. Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when impairment is determined using the fair value method.
The fair value for impaired loans and other real estate owned is measured based on the value of the collateral securing those loans/real estate and is determined using several methods. The fair value of real estate is generally determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. The appraisers typically determine the value of the real estate by utilizing an income or market valuation approach. If an appraisal is not available, the fair value may be determined by using a cash flow analysis. Fair value on other collateral such as business assets is typically calculated by using financial information such as financial statements and aging reports provided by the borrower and is discounted as considered appropriate.
The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments are as follows
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
Assets at December 31:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
73,312
|
$
|
73,312
|
$
|
58,307
|
$
|
58,307
|
||||||||
|
Interest-bearing time deposits
|
52,851
|
52,851
|
65,216
|
65,216
|
||||||||||||
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
518,491
|
518,491
|
539,370
|
539,370
|
||||||||||||
|
Investment securities held to maturity
|
427,909
|
442,469
|
287,427
|
286,270
|
||||||||||||
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
17,864
|
17,864
|
21,469
|
21,469
|
||||||||||||
|
Loans
|
2,642,517
|
2,658,227
|
2,752,706
|
2,715,924
|
||||||||||||
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
31,270
|
31,270
|
33,884
|
33,884
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swap asset
|
5,665
|
5,665
|
5,111
|
5,111
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest receivable
|
17,723
|
17,723
|
18,674
|
18,674
|
||||||||||||
|
Liabilities at December 31:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Deposits
|
$
|
3,134,655
|
$
|
3,139,757
|
$
|
3,268,880
|
$
|
3,280,489
|
||||||||
|
Borrowings:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
156,305
|
157,342
|
109,871
|
110,494
|
||||||||||||
|
FHLB Advances
|
138,095
|
141,693
|
82,684
|
87,463
|
||||||||||||
|
Subordinated debentures and term loans
|
194,974
|
142,632
|
226,440
|
176,259
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swap liability
|
7,797
|
7,797
|
3,876
|
3,876
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest payable
|
2,925
|
2,925
|
4,262
|
4,262
|
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
: The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates carrying value.
Interest-bearing time deposits
: The fair value of interest-bearing time deposits approximates carrying value.
Investment securities
: Fair value is based on quoted market prices, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.
Mortgage loans held for sale
: The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale approximates carrying value.
74
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 11
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS continued
Loans:
The fair value for loans is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. See Impaired Loans above.
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
: The fair value of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock is based on the price which it may be resold to the Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank.
Interest receivable and Interest payable
: The fair value of interest receivable/payable approximates carrying value.
Derivative instruments
: The fair value of interest rate swaps reflect the estimated amounts that would have been received to terminate these contracts at the reporting date based upon pricing or valuation models applied to current market information. Interest rate caps are valued using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rose above the strike rate of the caps. The projected cash receipts on the caps are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities.
Deposits:
The fair values of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand accounts and savings deposits are equal to the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. The carrying amounts for variable rate, fixed-term certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the balance sheet date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit and other time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on such time deposits.
Borrowings:
The fair value of borrowings is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation, based on current rates for similar debt.
NOTE 12
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
In the normal course of business there are outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, which are not included in the accompanying financial statements. The Corporation's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making such commitments as they do for instruments that are included in the consolidated balance sheets.
Financial instruments, whose contract amount represents credit risk as of December 31, were as follows:
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Amounts of commitments:
|
||||||||
|
Loan commitments to extend credit
|
$
|
619,901
|
$
|
531,752
|
||||
|
Standby letters of credit
|
$
|
28,665
|
$
|
37,713
|
||||
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer, as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.
The Corporation and subsidiaries are also subject to claims and lawsuits, which arise primarily in the ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Corporation.
75
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 13
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
National banking laws restrict the maximum amount of dividends that a bank may pay in any calendar year. National banks are limited to the bank’s retained net income (as defined) for the current year plus those for the previous two years. The amount at December 31, 2011, available for 2012 dividends from the Corporation’s subsidiaries (both banking and non-banking) was $14,225,000.
Total stockholders' equity for all subsidiaries at December 31, 2011, was $609,983,000 of which $595,758,000 was restricted from dividend distribution to the Corporation.
The Corporation has a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, enabling stockholders to elect to have their cash dividends on all shares held automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Corporation’s common stock. In addition, stockholders may elect to make optional cash payments up to an aggregate of $2,500 per quarter for the purchase of additional shares of common stock. The stock is credited to participant accounts at fair market value. Dividends are reinvested on a quarterly basis.
Equity Offering
On September 9, 2011, the Corporation entered into securities purchase agreements with two investors, pursuant to which the Corporation sold an aggregate of 2,822,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for gross proceeds of approximately $21.2 million. The purchase price for each share of common stock was $7.5. The common stock was issued in a direct private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
Preferred Stock
On February 20, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Letter Agreement (Purchase Agreement) with the Unites States Treasury (the “Treasury”), pursuant to which the Corporation sold (a) 116,000 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (“the Series A Preferred Stock”) and (b) a warrant to purchase 991,453 shares of the Corporation’s common stock (the “Warrant”) for an aggregate purchase price of $116 million in cash.
The Preferred Stock qualified as Tier I capital and was to pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5 percent per annum for the first five years and 9 percent per annum thereafter. The Series A Preferred Stock was non-voting except with respect to certain matters affecting the rights of the holders thereof, and was redeemable by the Corporation after three years. The Warrant had a ten year term and was immediately exercisable with an exercise price of $17.55 per share of common stock. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Treasury had agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the Warrant.
On June 30, 2010, the Corporation entered into an Exchange Agreement with the Treasury whereby the Treasury exchanged 46,400 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock for 46,400 shares of trust preferred securities, having a liquidation amount of $1,000 per share (the “Capital Securities”) issued by the Corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary trust, First Merchants Capital Trust III, a Delaware Statutory Trust (the “Trust”). The Trust simultaneously issued 1,435 shares of the Trust’s common securities (the “Common Securities”) to the Corporation for the purchase price of $1.4 million which constituted all of the issued and outstanding common securities of the Trust. The Trust used the tendered Series A Preferred Stock and the proceeds from the sale of the Common Securities to purchase $47.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Fixed Rate Perpetual Junior Subordinated Debentures, Series A issued by the Corporation (the “Debentures”). The Capital Securities and the Debentures bore interest, payable quarterly, at a rate of five percent until February 20, 2014 when the rate increases to nine percent. The Capital Securities and Debentures were redeemable by the Corporation upon proper notice and regulatory approval (a) at any time, so long as the Capital Securities were held by the Treasury and (b) at any time after June 30, 2015, if the Capital Securities were held by a person or entity other than the Treasury. The Series A Preferred Stock, purchased from the Treasury were cancelled. Following the exchange, the Treasury continued to hold 69,600 shares of Series A Preferred Stock along with the Warrant to initially purchase up to 991,453 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. This particular exchange resulted in a gain on retirement of Preferred Stock and favorably impacting retained earnings by $10.1 million (net of deferred taxes), which was also considered as part of earnings available to common stockholders in the earnings per common share (“EPS”) computations.
On September 22, 2011, the Corporation entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Corporation issued 90,782.94 shares of the Corporation’s Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), having a liquidation amount per share equal to $1,000, for a total purchase price of $90,782,940. The Purchase Agreement was entered into, and the Series B Preferred Stock was issued, pursuant to the SBLF program, a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, that encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion.
76
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 13
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY continued
Preferred Stock continued
The Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, beginning October 1, 2011. The Purchase Agreement defines the dividend rate as a percentage of the liquidation amount, and can fluctuate on a quarterly basis during the first ten quarters during which the Series B Preferred Stock is outstanding, based upon changes in the level of Qualified Small Business Lending (“QSBL”) by the Bank. Based upon the Bank’s level of QSBL over the baseline level calculated under the terms of the Purchase Agreement (the “Baseline”), the dividend rate for the initial dividend period has been set at 5 percent. For the second through tenth dividend periods, the dividend rate may be adjusted to between 1 percent and 5 percent per annum, to reflect the amount of change in the Bank’s level of QSBL. In addition to the dividend, in the event the Bank’s level of QSBL has not increased relative to the Baseline, at the beginning of the tenth calendar quarter, the Corporation will be subject to an additional lending incentive fee equal to 2 percent per annum. For the eleventh dividend period through the eighteenth dividend period, inclusive, and that portion of the nineteenth dividend period before, but not including, the four and one half year anniversary of the date of issuance, the dividend rate will be fixed at between 1 percent and 7 percent per annum based upon the increase in QSBL as compared to the baseline. After four and one half years from issuance, the dividend rate will increase to 9 percent.
The Series B Preferred Stock is non-voting, except in limited circumstances. In the event that the Corporation misses five dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock will have the right, but not the obligation, to appoint a representative as an observer on the Corporation’s Board of Directors. In the event that the Corporation misses six dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, and if the then outstanding aggregate liquidation amount of the Series B Preferred Stock is at least $25,000,000, then the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock will have the right to designate two directors to the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
The Series B Preferred Stock may be redeemed at any time at the Corporation’s option, at a redemption price of 100 percent of the liquidation amount plus accrued but unpaid dividends to the date of redemption for the current period, subject to the approval of its federal banking regulator.
The Series B Preferred Stock was issued in a private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Corporation has agreed to register the Series B Preferred Stock under certain circumstances set forth in Annex E to the Purchase Agreement. The Series B Preferred Stock is not subject to any contractual restrictions on transfer.
Also on September 22, 2011, the Corporation entered into and consummated two letter agreements (each, a “Repurchase Letter”) with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Corporation redeemed, out of the proceeds of the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock in the amount of $90,782,940 and cash of $25,813,171 (of which $21,165,000 was raised through a private placement of the Corporation’s common stock on September 9, 2011) for an aggregate redemption price of $116,596,111, including accrued but unpaid dividends to the date of redemption: (i) the remaining 69,600 shares of the Corporation’s Series A Preferred Stock, and (ii) all 46,400 Capital Securities held by the Treasury .
The foregoing summary of the terms of the Repurchase Letters is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the Repurchase Letters.
On November 23, 2011, the Corporation also repurchased the Warrant to purchase 991,453 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $17.55 per share with an expiration date of February 20, 2019 (the “Warrant”) held by the Treasury. The Corporation was the successful bidder in a private auction for the Warrant conducted by the Treasury with a winning bid of $367,500.
NOTE 14
REGULATORY CAPITAL
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies and are assigned to a capital category. The assigned capital category is largely determined by three ratios that are calculated according to the regulations: total risk adjusted capital, Tier 1 capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios. The ratios are intended to measure capital relative to assets and credit risk associated with those assets and off-balance sheet exposures of the entity. The capital category assigned to an entity can also be affected by qualitative judgments made by regulatory agencies about the risk inherent in the entity's activities that are not part of the calculated ratios.
There are five capital categories defined in the regulations, ranging from well capitalized to critically undercapitalized. Classification of a bank in any of the undercapitalized categories can result in actions by regulators that could have a material effect on a bank's operations.
77
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 14
REGULATORY CAPITAL continued
At December 31, 2011, the management of the Corporation believes that it meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. The most recent notifications from the regulatory agencies categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, a bank must maintain a minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets, Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier I capital to average assets of 10 percent, 6 percent and 5 percent, respectively. It should be noted that a bank's capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying the OCC's "prompt corrective action" regulations and that the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the Bank's overall financial condition or prospects.
Actual and required capital amounts and ratios are listed below.
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Required For
|
Required For
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Actual
|
Adequate Capital
|
Actual
|
Adequate Capital
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
487,393
|
16.54
|
%
|
$
|
235,781
|
8.00
|
%
|
$
|
476,490
|
15.74
|
%
|
$
|
242,195
|
8.00
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
|
First Merchants
|
477,805
|
16.26
|
235,089
|
8.00
|
450,629
|
14.89
|
242,088
|
8.00
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
410,132
|
13.92
|
%
|
$
|
117,890
|
4.00
|
%
|
$
|
388,090
|
12.82
|
%
|
$
|
121,098
|
4.00
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
|
First Merchants
|
440,909
|
15.00
|
117,545
|
4.00
|
412,654
|
13.64
|
121,044
|
4.00
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
410,132
|
10.17
|
%
|
$
|
161,350
|
4.00
|
%
|
$
|
388,090
|
9.50
|
%
|
$
|
163,352
|
4.00
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
|
First Merchants
|
440,909
|
10.96
|
160,848
|
4.00
|
412,654
|
10.14
|
162,790
|
4.00
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE 15
LOAN SERVICING
Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The loans are serviced primarily for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the unpaid balances totaled $136,867,000, $163,139,000 and $202,757,000 at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The amount of capitalized servicing assets is considered immaterial.
NOTE 16
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock options and restricted stock awards ("RSAs") have been issued to directors, officers and other management employees under the Corporation's 1999 Long-term Equity Incentive Plan and the 2009 Long-term Equity Incentive Plan. The stock options, which have a ten-year life, become 100 percent vested ranging from three months to two years and are fully exercisable when vested. Option exercise prices equal the Corporation's common stock closing price on NASDAQ on the date of grant. RSAs provide for the issuance of shares of the Corporation's common stock at no cost to the holder and generally vest after three years. The RSAs vest only if the employee is actively employed by the Corporation on the vesting date and, therefore, any unvested shares are forfeited. RSAs for employees retired from the Corporation are either immediately vested at retirement or continue to vest after retirement, depending on which plan the shares were granted under. Deferred stock units ("DSUs") have been credited to non-employee directors who have elected to defer payment of compensation under the Corporation's 2008 Equity Compensation Plan for Non-employee Directors. DSUs credited are equal to the restricted shares that the non-employee director would have received under the plan. As of December 31, 2011, all outstanding DSUs have been converted to RSA’s due to director retirements.
The Corporation’s 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) provides eligible employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries an opportunity to purchase shares of common stock of the Corporation through quarterly offerings financed by payroll deductions. The price of the stock to be paid by the employees shall be equal to 85 percent of the average of the closing price of the Corporation’s common stock on each trading day during the offering period. However, in no event shall such purchase price be less than the lesser of an amount equal to 85 percent of the market price of the Corporation’s stock on the offering date or an amount equal to 85 percent of the market value on the date of purchase. Common stock purchases are made quarterly and are paid through advance payroll deductions up to a calendar year maximum of $25,000.
Compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards is recorded by recognizing the unamortized grant date fair value of these awards over the remaining service periods of those awards, with no change in historical reported fair values and earnings. Awards are valued at fair value in accordance with provisions of share-based compensation guidance and are recognized on a straight-line basis over the service periods of each award. To complete the exercise of vested stock options, RSA’s and ESPP options, the Corporation generally issues new shares from its authorized but unissued share pool. Share-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 were $1,315,000, $1,750,000, and $2,294,000, respectively, and has been recognized as a component of salaries and benefits expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
78
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 16
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION continued
The estimated fair value of the stock options granted during 2011, 2010, and 2009 was calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following summarizes the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model:
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
2.74 | % | 2.38 | % | 2.03 | % | |||||||||
|
Expected price volatility
|
45.43 | % | 43.54 | % | 35.19 | % | |||||||||
|
Dividend yield
|
3.65 | % | 4.02 | % | 3.72 | % | |||||||||
|
Forfeiture rate
|
5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 4.00 | % | |||||||||
|
Weighted-average expected life, until exercise
|
6.91 |
years
|
6.68 |
years
|
6.57 |
years
|
|||||||||
The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions used to value share-based awards. The risk-free rate of interest, for periods equal to the expected life of the option, is based on a U.S. government instrument over a similar contractual term of the equity instrument. Expected price volatility is based on historical volatility of the Corporation’s common stock. In addition, the Corporation generally uses historical information to determine the dividend yield and weighted-average expected life of the options until exercise. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior with regard to option exercise timing and forfeiture rates are considered separately for valuation and attribution purposes.
Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Share-based compensation guidance requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods, if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Pre-vesting forfeitures were estimated to be approximately 5 percent for the year months ended December 31, 2011, based on historical experience.
The following table summarizes the components of the Corporation's share-based compensation awards recorded as expense:
|
Year Ended
|
Year Ended
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 31, 2011
|
December 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||
|
Stock and ESPP Options
|
||||||||||||
|
Pre-tax compensation expense
|
$
|
237
|
$
|
632
|
$
|
832
|
||||||
|
Income tax benefit
|
(21
|
)
|
(71
|
)
|
(87
|
)
|
||||||
|
Stock and ESPP option expense, net of income taxes
|
$
|
216
|
$
|
561
|
$
|
745
|
||||||
|
Restricted Stock Awards
|
||||||||||||
|
Pre-tax compensation expense
|
$
|
1,078
|
$
|
1,118
|
$
|
1,462
|
||||||
|
Income tax benefit
|
(371
|
)
|
(391
|
)
|
(501
|
)
|
||||||
|
Restricted stock awards expense, net of income taxes
|
$
|
707
|
$
|
727
|
$
|
961
|
||||||
|
Total Share-Based Compensation:
|
||||||||||||
|
Pre-tax compensation expense
|
$
|
1,315
|
$
|
1,750
|
$
|
2,294
|
||||||
|
Income tax benefit
|
(392
|
)
|
(462
|
)
|
(588
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total share-based compensation expense, net of income taxes
|
$
|
923
|
$
|
1,288
|
$
|
1,706
|
||||||
As of December 31, 2011, unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options and RSAs totaling $57,736 and $1,212,269, respectively, is expected to be recognized over weighted-average periods of 0.59 and 1.39 years, respectively.
Stock option activity under the Corporation's stock option plans, as of December 31, 2011, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2011, were as follows:
|
Number of
Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Term (in Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011
|
1,061,429
|
$
|
23.01
|
|||||||||||||
|
Granted
|
52,298
|
$
|
9.14
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cancelled
|
(77,856
|
)
|
$
|
20.25
|
||||||||||||
|
Outstanding December 31, 2011
|
1,035,871
|
$
|
22.57
|
4.37
|
88,425
|
|||||||||||
|
Vested and Expected to Vest at December 31, 2011
|
1,035,871
|
$
|
22.57
|
4.37
|
88,425
|
|||||||||||
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2011
|
955,121
|
$
|
23.82
|
4.00
|
1,350
|
|||||||||||
The weighted-average grant date fair value was $3.09 for stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2011.
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Corporation's closing stock price on the last trading day of 2011 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their stock options on December 31, 2011. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Corporation's common stock. There were no stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2011.
79
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 16
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION continued
The following table summarizes information on unvested RSAs outstanding as of December 31, 2011:
|
Number of
Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value
|
|||||||
|
Unvested RSAs at January 1, 2011
|
272,737
|
$
|
12.46
|
|||||
|
Granted
|
144,184
|
$
|
8.90
|
|||||
|
Forfeited
|
(6,010
|
)
|
$
|
8.81
|
||||
|
Vested
|
(72,824
|
)
|
$
|
23.24
|
||||
|
Unvested RSAs at December 31, 2011
|
338,087
|
$
|
8.65
|
|||||
The grant date fair value of ESPP options was estimated at the beginning of the October 1, 2011, quarterly offering period of approximately $17,000. The ESPP options vested during the three months ending December 31, 2011, leaving no unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested ESPP options at December 31, 2011.
NOTE 17
PENSION AND OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Corporation’s defined-benefit pension plans cover approximately 33 percent of the Corporation’s employees. The benefits are based primarily on years of service and employees’ pay near retirement. Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to service-to-date, but also for those expected to be earned in the future. The Corporation also maintains post retirement benefit plans that provide health insurance benefits to retirees. The plans allow retirees to be carried under the Corporation’s health insurance plan, generally from ages 55 to 65. The retirees pay 100 percent of the premiums due for their coverage.
The table below sets forth the plans’ funded status and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, using measurement dates of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Change in benefit obligation
|
||||||||
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$
|
61,422
|
$
|
57,852
|
||||
|
Service Cost
|
252
|
342
|
||||||
|
Interest Cost
|
3,208
|
3,291
|
||||||
|
Actuarial Loss (Gain)
|
7,346
|
3,226
|
||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(3,459
|
)
|
(3,289
|
)
|
||||
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
68,769
|
61,422
|
||||||
|
Change in plan assets
|
||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
63,275
|
60,656
|
||||||
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
1,726
|
5,419
|
||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
||||||||
|
Employer contributions
|
536
|
489
|
||||||
|
Benefits Paid
|
(3,459
|
)
|
(3,289
|
)
|
||||
|
End of Year
|
62,078
|
63,275
|
||||||
|
Funded Status at End of Year
|
$
|
(6,691
|
)
|
$
|
1,853
|
|||
|
Assets and Liabilities Recognized in the Balance Sheets:
|
||||||||
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
$
|
(10,928
|
)
|
$
|
7,419
|
|||
|
Assets
|
$
|
$
|
6,938
|
|||||
|
Liabilities
|
$
|
6,691
|
$
|
5,085
|
||||
|
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic
Benefit Cost Consist of:
|
||||||||
|
Accumulated Loss
|
$
|
(16,310
|
)
|
$
|
(11,027
|
)
|
||
|
Prior Service Credit
|
(56
|
)
|
(71
|
)
|
||||
|
$
|
(16,366
|
)
|
$
|
(11,098
|
)
|
|||
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit plans was $68,729,000 and $61,275,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
80
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 17
PENSION AND OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS continued
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets is included in the table below. At the end of 2010, the accumulated benefit obligation of the Retirement Pension Plan, the largest plan, was not in excess of plan assets; therefore, it was not included in the table below in 2010. At the end of 2011, the accumulated benefit obligation of the Retirement Pension Plan was in excess of plan assets, and is included in the table below for 2011.
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Projected Benefit Obligation
|
$
|
68,769
|
$
|
5,085
|
||||
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
|
$
|
68,729
|
$
|
5,085
|
||||
|
Fair Value of Plan Assets
|
$
|
62,078
|
||||||
The following table shows the components of net periodic pension costs:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Service Cost
|
$
|
252
|
$
|
342
|
||||
|
Interest Cost
|
3,208
|
3,291
|
||||||
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets
|
(4,313
|
)
|
(4,136
|
)
|
||||
|
Amortization of Prior Service Costs
|
25
|
25
|
||||||
|
Amortization of Net Loss
|
1,129
|
1,026
|
||||||
|
Net Periodic Pension Cost
|
$
|
301
|
$
|
548
|
||||
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Net Periodic Pension Cost
|
$
|
301
|
$
|
548
|
||||
|
Net gain (loss)
|
9,933
|
1,942
|
||||||
|
Actuarial gain (loss)
|
(1,129
|
)
|
(1,026
|
)
|
||||
|
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit
|
(25
|
)
|
(25
|
)
|
||||
|
Total Recognized in other Comprehensive Income
|
8,779
|
891
|
||||||
|
Total Recognized in NPPC and OCI
|
$
|
9,080
|
$
|
1,439
|
||||
The estimated net loss and transition obligation for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic pension cost over the next fiscal year are:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Amortization of Net Loss
|
$
|
(2,319
|
)
|
$
|
(1,160
|
)
|
||
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
|
(25
|
)
|
(25
|
)
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
(2,344
|
)
|
$
|
(1,185
|
)
|
||
Significant assumptions include:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Weighted-average Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligation:
|
||||||||
|
Discount Rate
|
4.50
|
%
|
5.40
|
%
|
||||
|
Rate of Compensation Increase
|
4.00
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
||||
|
Weighted-average Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Cost:
|
||||||||
|
Discount Rate
|
5.40
|
%
|
5.90
|
%
|
||||
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets
|
7.00
|
%
|
7.00
|
%
|
||||
|
Rate of Compensation Increase
|
4.00
|
%
|
3.50
|
%
|
||||
At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Corporation based its estimate of the expected long-term rate of return on analysis of the historical returns of the plans and current market information available. The plans’ investment strategies are to provide for preservation of capital with an emphasis on long-term growth without undue exposure to risk. The assets of the plans’ are invested in accordance with the plans’ Investment Policy Statement, subject to strict compliance with ERISA and any other applicable statutes.
The plans’ risk management practices include quarterly evaluations of investment managers, including reviews of compliance with investment manager guidelines and restrictions; ability to exceed performance objectives; adherence to the investment philosophy and style; and ability to exceed the performance of other investment managers. The evaluations are reviewed by management with appropriate follow-up and actions taken, as deemed necessary. The Investment Policy Statement generally allows investments in cash and cash equivalents, real estate, fixed income debt securities and equity securities, and specifically prohibits investments in derivatives, options, futures, private placements, short selling, non-marketable securities and purchases of non-investment grade bonds.
81
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 17
PENSION AND OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS continued
At December 31, 2011, the maturities of the plans’ debt securities ranged from 45 days to 10.83 years, with a weighted average maturity of 5.38 years. At December 31, 2010, the maturities of the plans’ debt securities ranged from 55 days to 12.8 years, with a weighted average maturity of 5.41 years.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as of December 31, 2011. The minimum contribution required in 2012 will likely be zero but the Corporation may decide to make a discretionary contribution during the year.
|
2012
|
$
|
3,810
|
||
|
2013
|
3,937
|
|||
|
2014
|
4,120
|
|||
|
2015
|
4,260
|
|||
|
2016
|
4,249
|
|||
|
After 2016
|
21,781
|
|||
|
$
|
42,157
|
Plan assets are re-balanced quarterly. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, plan assets by category are as follows:
|
December 31, 2011
|
December 31, 2010
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Actual
|
Target
|
Actual
|
Target
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
3.2
|
%
|
3.0
|
%
|
5.3
|
%
|
4.0
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
49.7
|
51.0
|
51.5
|
48.0
|
||||||||||||
|
Debt securities
|
45.5
|
44.0
|
43.2
|
48.0
|
||||||||||||
|
Alternative investments
|
1.6
|
2.0
|
||||||||||||||
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||||||
The First Merchants Corporation Retirement and Income Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”), a Section 401(k) qualified defined contribution plan, was amended on March 1, 2005 to provide enhanced retirement benefits, including employer and matching contributions, for eligible employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The Corporation matches employees’ contributions primarily at the rate of 50 percent for the first 6 percent of base salary contributed by participants.
Beginning in 2005, employees who have completed 1,000 hours of service and are an active employee on the last day of the year receive an additional retirement contribution after year-end. The amount of a participant’s retirement contribution varies from 2 to 7 percent of salary based upon years of service. Employees hired after January 1, 2010 do not participate in the additional retirement contribution. Full vesting occurs after five years of service. The Corporation’s expense for the Savings Plan, including the additional retirement contribution, was $2,824,000 for 2011, $2,728,000 for 2010 and $2,991,000 for 2009.
The Corporation maintains post retirement benefit plans that provide health insurance benefits to retirees. The plans allow retirees to be carried under the Corporation’s health insurance plan, generally from ages 55 to 65. The retirees pay 100 percent of the premiums due for their coverage. The accrued benefits payable under the plans totaled $4,116,000 and $4,475,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Post retirement plan expense totaled $528,000, $574,000 and $705,000 for the years ending December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Pension Plan Assets
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as the general classification of pension plan assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, plan assets are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 plan assets total $46,945,000 and include cash and cash equivalents, U.S. companies, U.S. mutual funds, international mutual funds, bond mutual funds and specialty alternative funds. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of plan assets with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. Level 2 plan assets total $15,133,000 and include U.S. Government agencies, taxable municipals and corporate bonds. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, plan assets are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. There are no assets classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy at December 31, 2011.
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2011
|
Fair Value
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash & cash equivalents
|
$
|
2,009
|
$
|
2,009
|
||||||||||||
|
Equity Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. companies
|
611
|
611
|
||||||||||||||
|
U.S. mutual funds
|
26,508
|
26,508
|
||||||||||||||
|
International mutual funds
|
3,701
|
3,701
|
||||||||||||||
|
Debt Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Bond mutual funds
|
13,133
|
13,133
|
||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
314
|
$
|
314
|
|||||||||||||
|
Taxable municipals
|
7,632
|
7,632
|
||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds
|
7,186
|
7,186
|
||||||||||||||
|
Specialty alternative funds
|
984
|
984
|
||||||||||||||
82
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 18
INCOME TAX
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||
|
Income Tax Expense for the Year Ended December 31:
|
||||||||||||
|
Currently Payable:
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
399
|
$
|
(1,780
|
)
|
$
|
(13,387
|
)
|
||||
|
State
|
(4,179
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Deferred:
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal
|
8,256
|
(1,810
|
)
|
(15,037
|
)
|
|||||||
|
State
|
4,179
|
|||||||||||
|
Total Income Tax Expense
|
$
|
8,655
|
$
|
(3,590
|
)
|
$
|
(28,424
|
)
|
||||
|
Reconciliation of Federal Statutory to Actual Tax Expense:
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal Statutory Income Tax at 35%
|
$
|
11,867
|
$
|
1,162
|
$
|
(24,216
|
)
|
|||||
|
Tax-exempt Interest Income
|
(3,714
|
)
|
(3,733
|
)
|
(3,623
|
)
|
||||||
|
Non-deductible Interest Expense
|
649
|
421
|
||||||||||
|
Stock Compensation
|
69
|
150
|
205
|
|||||||||
|
Earnings on Life Insurance
|
(899
|
)
|
(725
|
)
|
(550
|
)
|
||||||
|
Tax Credits
|
(99
|
)
|
(116
|
)
|
(758
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other
|
782
|
(749
|
)
|
518
|
||||||||
|
Actual Tax Expense
|
$
|
8,655
|
$
|
(3,590
|
)
|
$
|
(28,424
|
)
|
||||
Tax expense applicable to security gains and losses, including unrealized losses relating to other-than-temporary impairment charges, for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was $714,000, $652,000 and $1,544,000, respectively.
The Corporation or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With a few exceptions, the Corporation is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2008.
The tax effects of temporary differences related to deferred taxes shown on the balance sheets were:
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Deferred Tax Asset at December 31:
|
||||||||
|
Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Differences in Accounting for Loan Losses
|
$
|
29,690
|
$
|
35,014
|
||||
|
Differences in Accounting for Loan Fees
|
805
|
641
|
||||||
|
Differences in Accounting for Loans and Securities
|
440
|
|||||||
|
Deferred Compensation
|
7,612
|
7,423
|
||||||
|
Difference in Accounting for Pensions and Other Employee Benefits
|
3,750
|
|||||||
|
Federal & State Income Tax Loss Carryforward and Credits
|
12,416
|
14,196
|
||||||
|
Other
|
8,796
|
579
|
||||||
|
Total Assets
|
63,069
|
58,293
|
||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Differences in Depreciation Methods
|
5,859
|
5,387
|
||||||
|
Differences in Accounting for Loans and Securities
|
42
|
|||||||
|
Difference in Accounting for Pensions and Other Employee Benefits
|
581
|
|||||||
|
State Income Tax
|
354
|
354
|
||||||
|
Net Unrealized Gain on Securities Available for Sale
|
8,118
|
951
|
||||||
|
Other
|
1,137
|
2,827
|
||||||
|
Total Liabilities
|
15,510
|
10,100
|
||||||
|
Net Deferred Tax Asset Before Valuation Allowance
|
47,559
|
48,193
|
||||||
|
Valuation allowance:
|
||||||||
|
Beginning Balance
|
(13,258
|
)
|
(12,680
|
)
|
||||
|
Increase During the Year
|
(2,443
|
)
|
(578
|
)
|
||||
|
Ending Balance
|
(15,701
|
)
|
(13,258
|
)
|
||||
|
Net Deferred Tax Asset
|
$
|
31,858
|
$
|
34,935
|
||||
The decrease in the Corporation’s net deferred tax asset was primarily driven by significant decreases in the timing differences associated with the deductibility of the provision for loan losses and utilization of the federal net operating loss carryforward. Additionally, the deferred tax liability associated with the net unrealized gain on securities available for sale increased. Partially offsetting these changes was an increase in the deferred tax asset associated with pensions and other employee benefits.
The Corporation has recorded a valuation allowance of $15,701,000 related to deferred state taxes as it does not anticipate having future state taxable income sufficient to fully utilize the deferred state tax asset. This is primarily due to the Corporation’s current tax structure as discussed in the “INCOME TAXES” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As of December 31, 2011, the Corporation had approximately $125,102,000 of state tax loss carryforward available to offset future franchise tax. This state loss carryforward has a full valuation allowance.
83
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 19
NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the combination of all dilutive common share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Corporation’s share-based compensation plans, and the weighted-average shares outstanding during the reporting period.
Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of in-the-money share-based awards, which are calculated based on the average share price for each period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of share-based awards, the amount of compensation expense, if any, for future service that the Corporation has not yet recognized, and the amount of estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when share-based awards are exercised, are assumed to be used to repurchase common stock in the current period.
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net
Income
|
Weighted-Average Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
Net
Income
|
Weighted-Average Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
Net
Income (Loss)
|
Weighted-Average Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic net income (loss) per share:
|
$
|
25,252
|
$
|
6,909
|
$
|
(40,763
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gain on exchange of preferred stock for trust
preferred debt
|
11,353
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loss on CPP unamortized discount
|
(1,401
|
)
|
(1,301
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of trust preferred securities
|
(10,857
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
(3,981
|
)
|
(5,239
|
)
|
(4,979
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
9,013
|
26,550,043
|
$
|
0.34
|
11,722
|
24,519,033
|
$
|
0.48
|
(45,742
|
)
|
21,116,616
|
$
|
(2.17
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
|
143,805
|
123,392
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
$
|
9,013
|
26,693,848
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
11,722
|
24,642,425
|
$
|
0.48
|
$
|
(45,742
|
)
|
21,116,616
|
$
|
(2.17
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Options to purchase 1,029,577, 1,052,994, and 1,094,383 shares of common stock with weighted average exercise prices of $22.57, $23.01, and $23.51 at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common stock.
NOTE 20
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
The following table sets forth certain quarterly results for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
Net Income
Per Share
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Interest Income
|
Interest Expense
|
Net Interest Income
|
Provision for Loan Losses
|
Net Realized Gains on Available for Sale Securities
|
Loss on Extinguishment of Trust Preferred Securities
|
Loss on CPP Unamortized Discount
|
Preferred Stock Dividends and Discount Accretion
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders
|
Basic
|
Diluted
|
Basic
|
Diluted
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
March
|
$
|
46,366
|
$
|
10,889
|
$
|
35,477
|
$
|
5,594
|
$
|
63
|
$
|
988
|
$
|
4,473
|
25,605,571
|
25,763,378
|
$
|
0.17
|
$
|
0.17
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
June
|
45,721
|
9,874
|
35,847
|
5,625
|
825
|
990
|
4,498
|
25,656,826
|
25,782,799
|
0.18
|
0.18
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
September
|
45,085
|
9,234
|
35,851
|
5,556
|
861
|
$
|
10,857
|
$
|
1,401
|
868
|
(6,384
|
)
|
26,367,067
|
26,367,067
|
(0.25
|
)
|
(0.25
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December
|
44,073
|
7,893
|
36,180
|
5,855
|
290
|
1,135
|
6,426
|
28,540,469
|
28,699,505
|
0.24
|
0.24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$
|
181,245
|
$
|
37,890
|
$
|
143,355
|
$
|
22,630
|
$
|
2,039
|
$
|
10,857
|
$
|
1,401
|
$
|
3,981
|
$
|
9,013
|
26,550,043
|
26,693,848
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.34
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average Shares
Outstanding
|
Net Income
Per Share
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Interest Income
|
Interest Expense
|
Net Interest Income
|
Provision for Loan Losses
|
Net Realized Gains (Losses) on Available for Sale Securities
|
Gain on Exchange of Preferred Stock for Trust Preferred Debt
|
Loss on CPP Unamortized Discount
|
Preferred Stock Dividends and Discount Accretion
|
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders
|
Basic
|
Diluted
|
Basic
|
Diluted
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
March
|
$
|
51,699
|
$
|
15,484
|
$
|
36,215
|
$
|
13,869
|
$
|
1,354
|
$
|
1,450
|
$
|
136
|
21,373,405
|
21,462,175
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
0.01
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
June
|
50,491
|
14,312
|
36,179
|
15,015
|
(143
|
)
|
$
|
11,353
|
$
|
1,301
|
1,443
|
8,266
|
25,523,145
|
25,633,452
|
0.35
|
0.35
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
September
|
49,431
|
13,749
|
35,682
|
10,521
|
(654
|
)
|
870
|
765
|
25,550,222
|
25,685,538
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December
|
47,957
|
12,464
|
35,493
|
7,078
|
1,305
|
1,476
|
2,555
|
25,571,893
|
25,737,352
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$
|
199,578
|
$
|
56,009
|
$
|
143,569
|
$
|
46,483
|
$
|
1,862
|
$
|
11,353
|
$
|
1,301
|
$
|
5,239
|
$
|
11,722
|
24,519,033
|
24,642,425
|
$
|
0.48
|
$
|
0.48
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 21
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (parent company only)
Presented below is condensed financial information as to financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Corporation. As the result of merging multiple bank charters into one bank charter throughout 2009 and 2010, all but a few employees and their related expenses were moved from the parent company to the Bank beginning on January 1, 2011.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||
|
Cash
|
$
|
20,654
|
$
|
31,382
|
||||
|
Investment in Subsidiaries
|
611,809
|
570,865
|
||||||
|
Goodwill
|
448
|
448
|
||||||
|
Other Assets
|
8,540
|
8,968
|
||||||
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
641,451
|
$
|
611,663
|
||||
|
Liabilities
|
||||||||
|
Borrowings
|
$
|
115,826
|
$
|
147,188
|
||||
|
Other Liabilities
|
11,158
|
10,067
|
||||||
|
Total Liabilities
|
126,984
|
157,255
|
||||||
|
Stockholders' Equity
|
514,467
|
454,408
|
||||||
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
$
|
641,451
|
$
|
611,663
|
||||
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||
|
Income
|
||||||||||||
|
Dividends from Subsidiaries
|
$
|
4,677
|
$
|
3,256
|
$
|
14,224
|
||||||
|
Administrative Services Fees from Subsidiaries
|
28,489
|
22,153
|
||||||||||
|
Other Income
|
(11
|
)
|
190
|
1,656
|
||||||||
|
Total Income
|
4,666
|
31,935
|
38,033
|
|||||||||
|
Expenses
|
||||||||||||
|
Amortization of Fair Value Adjustments
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest Expense
|
7,661
|
6,816
|
5,772
|
|||||||||
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
2,688
|
25,884
|
22,259
|
|||||||||
|
Net Occupancy and Equipment Expenses
|
31
|
6,213
|
5,854
|
|||||||||
|
Telephone Expenses
|
21
|
918
|
1,078
|
|||||||||
|
Postage and Courier Expenses
|
1
|
1,786
|
1,653
|
|||||||||
|
Other Expenses
|
1,501
|
5,382
|
5,901
|
|||||||||
|
Total Expenses
|
11,903
|
46,999
|
42,517
|
|||||||||
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Tax Benefit and Equity in Undistributed Income of Subsidiaries
|
(7,238
|
)
|
(15,064
|
)
|
(4,484
|
)
|
||||||
|
Income Tax Benefit
|
3,256
|
5,970
|
4,948
|
|||||||||
|
Income (Loss) Before Equity in Undistributed Income of Subsidiaries
|
(3,982
|
)
|
(9,094
|
)
|
464
|
|||||||
|
Equity in Undistributed (Distributions in Excess of) Income of Subsidiaries
|
29,234
|
16,003
|
(41,227
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
25,252
|
6,909
|
(40,763
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Gain on Exchange of Preferred Stock
|
11,353
|
|||||||||||
|
Loss on CPP Unamortized Discount
|
(1,401
|
)
|
(1,301
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Loss on Extinguishment of Trust Preferred Securities
|
(10,857
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Preferred Stock Dividends and Discount Accretion
|
(3,981
|
)
|
(5,239
|
)
|
(4,979
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders
|
$
|
9,013
|
$
|
11,722
|
$
|
(45,742
|
)
|
|||||
85
PART II: ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 21
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (parent company only) continued
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||
|
Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$
|
25,252
|
$
|
6,909
|
$
|
(40,763
|
)
|
|||||
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
|
||||||||||||
|
Provided by Operating Activities
|
||||||||||||
|
Share-based Compensation
|
524
|
1,750
|
2,294
|
|||||||||
|
Tax Benefit from Share Based Compensation
|
50
|
(60
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Distributions in Excess of (Equity in Undistributed) Income of Subsidiaries
|
(28,530
|
)
|
(16,003
|
)
|
41,227
|
|||||||
|
Net Change in:
|
||||||||||||
|
Other Assets
|
5,747
|
3,309
|
(2,315
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Other Liabilities
|
1,091
|
(744
|
)
|
(19,866
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Investment in Subsidiaries - Operating Activities
|
(6,593
|
)
|
(20
|
)
|
4,809
|
|||||||
|
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities
|
(2,509
|
)
|
(4,749
|
)
|
(14,674
|
)
|
||||||
|
Investing Activities - Investment in Subsidiaries
|
(12,500
|
)
|
(58,000
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(12,500
|
)
|
(58,000
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash Dividends
|
(4,729
|
)
|
(5,920
|
)
|
(14,254
|
)
|
||||||
|
Borrowings
|
||||||||||||
|
Repayment of Borrowings
|
(46,400
|
)
|
(20,000
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Preferred stock issued under Capital Purchase Program
|
116,000
|
|||||||||||
|
Preferred stock redemption under Capital Purchase Program
|
(69,600
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Preferred stock issued under Small Business Lending Fund
|
90,783
|
|||||||||||
|
Repurchase of Common Stock Warrants under Capital Purchase Program
|
(368
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Common Stock Issued
|
21,165
|
24,150
|
||||||||||
|
Stock Issued Under Employee Benefit Plans
|
669
|
582
|
825
|
|||||||||
|
Stock Issued Under Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
|
89
|
91
|
527
|
|||||||||
|
Stock Options Exercised
|
||||||||||||
|
Tax Benefit from Share Based Compensation
|
(50
|
)
|
60
|
|||||||||
|
Stock Redeemed
|
(126
|
)
|
(76
|
)
|
(193
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other
|
298
|
198
|
||||||||||
|
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities
|
(8,219
|
)
|
18,975
|
82,965
|
||||||||
|
Net Change in Cash
|
(10,728
|
)
|
1,726
|
10,291
|
||||||||
|
Cash, Beginning of the Year
|
31,382
|
29,656
|
19,365
|
|||||||||
|
Cash, End of Year
|
$
|
20,654
|
$
|
31,382
|
$
|
29,656
|
||||||
NOTE 22
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On February 10, 2012, the Bank entered into an agreement with the FDIC to purchase approximately $117 million of loans and assume $136 million of deposits in Shelby County Indiana. Under the Modified Whole Bank transaction without loss share, the FDIC excluded all construction and development loans, all land loans, all non-performing loans including non-accrual, restructured and 90 days past due credits and all OREO balances. The remaining assets were purchased for a $29 million discount and the deposits were assumed at no premium.
The Bank also acquired the main office building in Shelbyville, Indiana for $1.4 million. Asset and liability balances are subject to change based on activities between the bid valuation and the purchase dates. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are subject to internal adjustment under generally accepted accounting principles.
NOTE 23
ACCOUNTING MATTERS
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05.
The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-12,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05
.
The amendments to the Codification in ASU No. 2011-12 are effective at the same time as the amendments in ASU No. 2011-05
, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income
, so that entities will not be required to comply with the presentation requirements in ASU No. 2011-05 that ASU No. 2011-12 is deferring.
86
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(table dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 23
ACCOUNTING MATTERS continued
In order to defer only those changes in ASU No. 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the paragraphs in ASU No. 2011-12 supersede certain pending paragraphs in ASU No. 2011-05. The amendments are being made to allow the FASB time to re-deliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the FASB is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, The Corporation will continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU No. 2011-05.
All other requirements in ASU No. 2011-05 are not affected by ASU No. 2011-12, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. The Corporation will apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.
The eligibility criteria for offsetting are different in IFRS and U.S. GAAP. Offsetting, otherwise known as netting, is the presentation of assets and liabilities as a single net amount in the statement of financial position (balance sheet). Unlike IFRS, U.S. GAAP allows companies the option to present net in their balance sheets derivatives that are subject to a legally enforceable netting arrangement with the same party where rights of set-off are only available in the event of default or bankruptcy.
To address these differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP, in January 2011 the FASB and the IASB (the Boards) issued an exposure draft that proposed new criteria for netting that were narrower than the current conditions currently in U.S. GAAP. Nevertheless, in response to feedback from their respective stakeholders, the Boards decided to retain their existing offsetting models. Instead, the Boards have issued common disclosure requirements related to offsetting arrangements to allow investors to better compare financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS or U.S. GAAP.
The amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification in this ASU require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Coinciding with the release of ASU No. 2011-11, the IASB has issued
Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Amendments to IFRS 7)
. This amendment requires disclosures about the offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities common to those in ASU No. 2011-11.
The Corporation is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Corporation will also provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-09, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80): Disclosures about an Employer's Participation in a Multiemployer Plan.
ASU 2011-09 is intended to address concerns from various users of financial statements on the lack of transparency about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Users of financial statements have requested additional disclosure to increase awareness of the commitments and risks involved with participating in multiemployer pension plans. The amendments in this ASU will require additional disclosures about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Previously, disclosures were limited primarily to the historical contributions made to the plans.
ASU 2011-09 applies to nongovernmental entities that participate in multiemployer plans. For the Corporation, ASU 2011-09 is effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permissible for both public and nonpublic entities. ASU 2011-09 should be applied retrospectively for all prior periods presented.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment.
ASU 2011-08 is intended to simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. ASU 2011-08 permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is "more likely than not" that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50%.
ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The Corporation is assessing the impact of ASU 2011-08 on goodwill impairment testing but does not expect an impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
87
PART II: ITEM 9., ITEM 9A. AND ITEM 9B.
In connection with its audits for the two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, there have been no disagreements with the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or audit scope or procedure, nor have there been any changes in accountants.
At the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”), the Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Corporation reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of the Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. As part of its function of assisting the Corporation’s Board of Directors in discharging its responsibility of ensuring all types of risk to the organization are properly being managed, mitigated and monitored by management, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors oversees management’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Accordingly, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 is effective based on the specified criteria.
There have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referenced above that occurred during the Corporation’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
BKD, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, which appears below.
88
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders
First Merchants Corporation
Muncie, Indiana
We have audited First Merchants Corporation's (Corporation) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Corporation's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, First Merchants Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of First Merchants Corporation and our report dated March 15, 2012, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
BKD, LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 15, 2012
None
89
The information in the Corporation’s Proxy Statement dated March 12, 2012 furnished to its stockholders in connection with an annual meeting to be held April 27, 2012 (the “2012 Proxy Statement”), under the captions "BOARD OF DIRECTORS”; “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE”; "BOARD COMMITTEES - AUDIT COMMITTEE"; and "SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE", is expressly incorporated herein by reference. The information required under this item relating to executive officers is set forth in Part I, “Supplemental Information - Executive Officers of the Registrant” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Banking Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Corporate Controller and Corporate Treasurer. It is part of the Corporation’s Code of Business Conduct, which applies to all employees and directors of the Corporation and its affiliates. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct may be obtained, free of charge, by writing to First Merchants Corporation at 200 East Jackson Street, Muncie, IN 47305. In addition, the Code of Ethics is maintained on the Corporation’s website, which can be accessed at www.firstmerchants.com.
The information in the Corporation’s 2012 Proxy Statement, under the captions, "BOARD COMMITTEES - COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Compensation and Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation and Compensation and Human Resources Committee Report"; "BOARD COMMITTEES - RISK AND CREDIT POLICY COMMITTEE"; "COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS"; and "COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS" is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
The information in the Corporation’s 2012 Proxy Statement, under the captions, "SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT", is expressly incorporated herein by reference. The information required under this item relating to equity compensation plans is set forth in Part II, Item 5 under the table entitled “Equity Compensation Plan Information” on this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The information in the Corporation’s 2012 Proxy Statement, under the captions, "CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - BOARD INDEPENDENCE"; and "TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS", is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
The information in the Corporation’s 2012 Proxy Statement, under the caption "INDEPENDENT AUDITOR", is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
90
PART IV: ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(a) 1. The following financial statements are filed as part of this document under Item 8 hereof:
Independent accountants' report
Consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010
Consolidated statements of operations, years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated statements of stockholders' equity, years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated statements of cash flows, years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Notes to consolidated financial statements
(a) 2. Financial statement schedules:
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
(a) 3. Exhibits:
| Exhibit No : | Description of Exhibits : |
|
3.1
|
First Merchants Corporation Articles of Incorporation, as amended (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2011)
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws of First Merchants Corporation dated October 28, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2009)
|
|
3.3
|
First Merchants Corporation Articles of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation for the Series B Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
4.1
|
First Merchants Corporation Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of First Merchants Capital Trust II dated as of July 2, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2007)
|
|
4.2
|
Indenture dated as of July 2, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2007)
|
|
4.3
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of July 2, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2007)
|
|
4.4
|
Form of Capital Securities Certification of First Merchants Capital Trust II (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2007)
|
|
4.5
|
Form of Certificate for the First Merchants Corporation Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A dated February 20, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
4.6
|
Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of First Merchants Corporation dated February 20, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
4.7
|
First Merchants Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 filed on August 21, 2009)
|
|
4.8
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
4.9
|
Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
4.10
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
4.11
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
4.12
|
Form of Capital Securities Certificate of First Merchants Capital Trust III (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
10.1
|
First Merchants Corporation Senior Management Incentive Compensation Program, dated February 11, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.2
|
First Merchants Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective April 29, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 10-Q filed on August 11, 2008) (1)
|
|
10.3
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Michael C. Rechin dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.4
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Mark K. Hardwick dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.5
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Michael J. Stewart dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.6
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with John J. Martin dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.7
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Jami L. Bradshaw dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.8
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Robert R. Connors dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
91
PART IV: ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS
FINANCIAL INFORMATION continued
(a) 3. Exhibits:
| Exhibit No : | Description of Exhibits : |
|
10.9
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Kimberly J. Ellington dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.10
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Jeffery B. Lorentson dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.11
|
Resolution of the Board of Directors of First Merchants Corporation on director compensation dated December 4, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2007) (1)
|
|
10.12
|
First Merchants Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and amendments thereto (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997) (1)
|
|
10.13
|
First Merchants Corporation 2009 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan effective May 6, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's form 8-K filed on May 11, 2009) (1)
|
|
10.14
|
First Merchants Corporation Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Plan dated January 1, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2007) (1)
|
|
10.15
|
First Merchants Corporation Participation Agreement of Michael C. Rechin dated January 26, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2007) (1)
|
|
10.16
|
First Merchants Corporation 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan effective July 1, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on May 11, 2009) (1)
|
|
10.17
|
Letter Agreement dated February 20, 2009, between First Merchants Corporation and the United States Department of the Treasury, which includes the Securities Purchase Agreement-Standard Terms attached thereto (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
10.18
|
Form of Senior Executive Officer Letter Agreement dated February 20, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
10.19
|
Form of Waiver dated February 20, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
10.20
|
ARRA Letter Agreement dated February 20, 2009, between First Merchants Corporation and the United States Department of the Treasury (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
10.21
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement between First Merchants Corporation and six groups of institutional investors, dated March 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8K filed on March 30, 2010
|
|
10.22
|
Exchange Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
10.23
|
First Merchants Corporation Share Purchase Agreement with Castle Creek Capital Partners IV, L.P. and Endicott Opportunity Partners III, L.P. dated September 9, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2011)
|
|
10.24
|
First Merchants Corporation Securities Purchase Agreement with the U.S. Department of Treasury, with respect to the Series B Preferred Stock dated September 22, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
10.25
|
First Merchants Corporation Repurchase Letter with the U.S. Department of Treasury, with respect to the Designated Preferred Stock dated September 22, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
10.26
|
First Merchants Corporation Repurchase Letter with the U.S. Department of Treasury, with respect to the Capital Securities dated September 22, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
10.27
|
2011 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.28
|
Purchase and Assumption Agreement – Modified Whole Bank; All Deposits, among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, receiver of SCB Bank, Shelbyville, Indiana, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and First Merchants Bank, dated as of February 10, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2012)
|
|
10.29
|
First Merchants Corporation repurchase of a warrant held by the U.S. Treasury Department, dated November 23, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on November 23, 2011)
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (2)
|
|
23
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (2)
|
|
24
|
Limited Power of Attorney (2)
|
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
|
|
32
|
Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
|
|
99.1
|
Financial statements and independent registered public accounting firm’s report for First Merchants Corporation 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2004) (2)
|
|
99.2
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer required under §111(b)(4) of the EESA (2)
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document (3)
|
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (3)
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (3)
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (3)
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (3)
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkebase Document (3)
|
|
(1) Management contract or compensatory plan
|
|
|
(2) Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(3) Furnished herewith.
|
92
PART IV: ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 15th day of March, 2012.
|
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
|
|||
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael C. Rechin | |
|
Michael C. Rechin,
|
|||
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report on Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated, on this 15 th day of March, 2012.
|
/s/ Michael C. Rechin
|
/s/ Mark K. Hardwick
|
||||
|
Michael C. Rechin, President and
|
Mark K. Hardwick, Executive Vice
|
||||
|
Chief Executive
|
President and Chief
|
||||
|
Officer (Principal
|
Financial Officer
|
||||
|
Executive Officer)
|
(Principal Financial
|
||||
|
and Accounting Officer)
|
|||||
|
/s/ Jerry R. Engle*
|
/s/ Michael C. Rechin
|
||||
|
Jerry R. Engle, Director
|
Michael C. Rechin, Director
|
||||
|
/s/ Roderick English*
|
/s/ Charles E. Schalliol*
|
||||
|
Roderick English, Director
|
Charles E. Schalliol, Director
|
||||
|
__________________
|
/s/ Patrick A. Sherman*
|
||||
|
Dr. Jo Ann M. Gora, Director
|
Patrick A. Sherman, Director
|
||||
|
/s/ William L. Hoy*
|
__________________
|
||||
|
William L. Hoy, Director
|
Terry L. Walker, Director
|
||||
|
/s/ Gary J. Lehman*
|
/s/ Jean L. Wojtowicz*
|
||||
|
Gary J. Lehman, Director
|
Jean L. Wojtowicz, Director
|
||||
|
*
|
By Mark K. Hardwick as Attorney-in Fact pursuant to a Limited Power of Attorney executed by the directors listed above, which Power of Attorney is being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit hereto.
|
|
|
By:
|
Mark K. Hardwick
|
|
|
Mark K. Hardwick
|
|||
|
As Attorney-in-Fact
March 15, 2012
|
|||
93
PART IV: ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| Exhibit No : | Description of Exhibits : |
|
3.1
|
First Merchants Corporation Articles of Incorporation, as amended (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2011)
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws of First Merchants Corporation dated October 28, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2009)
|
|
3.3
|
First Merchants Corporation Articles of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation for the Series B Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
4.1
|
First Merchants Corporation Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of First Merchants Capital Trust II dated as of July 2, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2007)
|
|
4.2
|
Indenture dated as of July 2, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2007)
|
|
4.3
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of July 2, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2007)
|
|
4.4
|
Form of Capital Securities Certification of First Merchants Capital Trust II (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on July 3, 2007)
|
|
4.5
|
Form of Certificate for the First Merchants Corporation Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A dated February 20, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
4.6
|
Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of First Merchants Corporation dated February 20, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
4.7
|
First Merchants Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 filed on August 21, 2009)
|
|
4.8
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
4.9
|
Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
4.10
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
4.11
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
4.12
|
Form of Capital Securities Certificate of First Merchants Capital Trust III (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
10.1
|
First Merchants Corporation Senior Management Incentive Compensation Program, dated February 11, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.2
|
First Merchants Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective April 29, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 10-Q filed on August 11, 2008) (1)
|
|
10.3
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Michael C. Rechin dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.4
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Mark K. Hardwick dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.5
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Michael J. Stewart dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.6
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with John J. Martin dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.7
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Jami L. Bradshaw dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.8
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Robert R. Connors dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.9
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Kimberly J. Ellington dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.10
|
First Merchants Corporation Change of Control Agreement, as amended, with Jeffery B. Lorentson dated June 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.11
|
Resolution of the Board of Directors of First Merchants Corporation on director compensation dated December 4, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2007) (1)
|
|
10.12
|
First Merchants Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and amendments thereto (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997) (1)
|
|
10.13
|
First Merchants Corporation 2009 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan effective May 6, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's form 8-K filed on May 11, 2009) (1)
|
|
10.14
|
First Merchants Corporation Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Plan dated January 1, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2007) (1)
|
|
10.15
|
First Merchants Corporation Participation Agreement of Michael C. Rechin dated January 26, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2007) (1)
|
|
10.16
|
First Merchants Corporation 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan effective July 1, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant's Form 8-K filed on May 11, 2009) (1)
|
|
10.17
|
Letter Agreement dated February 20, 2009, between First Merchants Corporation and the United States Department of the Treasury, which includes the Securities Purchase Agreement-Standard Terms attached thereto (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
10.18
|
Form of Senior Executive Officer Letter Agreement dated February 20, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
94
INDEX TO EXHIBITS continued
| Exhibit No : | Description of Exhibits : |
|
10.19
|
Form of Waiver dated February 20, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
10.20
|
ARRA Letter Agreement dated February 20, 2009, between First Merchants Corporation and the United States Department of the Treasury (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009)
|
|
10.21
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement between First Merchants Corporation and six groups of institutional investors, dated March 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8K filed on March 30, 2010
|
|
10.22
|
Exchange Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
|
|
10.23
|
First Merchants Corporation Share Purchase Agreement with Castle Creek Capital Partners IV, L.P. and Endicott Opportunity Partners III, L.P. dated September 9, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2011)
|
|
10.24
|
First Merchants Corporation Securities Purchase Agreement with the U.S. Department of Treasury, with respect to the Series B Preferred Stock dated September 22, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
10.25
|
First Merchants Corporation Repurchase Letter with the U.S. Department of Treasury, with respect to the Designated Preferred Stock dated September 22, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
10.26
|
First Merchants Corporation Repurchase Letter with the U.S. Department of Treasury, with respect to the Capital Securities dated September 22, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
10.27
|
2011 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2011) (1)
|
|
10.28
|
Purchase and Assumption Agreement – Modified Whole Bank; All Deposits, among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, receiver of SCB Bank, Shelbyville, Indiana, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and First Merchants Bank, dated as of February 10, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2012)
|
|
10.29
|
First Merchants Corporation repurchase of a warrant held by the U.S. Treasury Department, dated November 23, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to registrant’s Form 8-K filed on November 23, 2011)
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (2)
|
|
23
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (2)
|
|
24
|
Limited Power of Attorney (2)
|
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
|
|
32
|
Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
|
|
99.1
|
Financial statements and independent registered public accounting firm’s report for First Merchants Corporation 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2004) (2)
|
|
99.2
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer required under §111(b)(4) of the EESA (2)
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document (3)
|
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (3)
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (3)
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (3)
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (3)
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkebase Document (3)
|
|
(1) Management contract or compensatory plan
|
|
|
(2) Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(3) Furnished herewith.
|
95
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I: Item 1A. and Item 1BItem 1A. Risk Factors ContinuedItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsPart 1: Item 2. , Item 3. and Item 4Item 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. [reserved]Part Ii: Item 5. and Item 6. Part IIPart Ii: Item 5. and Item 6Part IIItem 5. Market For The Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesPart Ii: Item 5. and Item 6. Stock InformationItem 6. Selected Financial DataPart Ii: Item 7. and Item 7A. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations ContinuedItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskPart Ii: Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataPart Ii: Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Consolidated Financial StatementsPart Ii: Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataPart Ii: Item 9. , Item 9A. and Item 9BItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart Iii: Item 10. , Item 11. , Item 12. , Item 13. and Item 14Part IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPart Iv: Item 15. Financial Statement Schedules and ExhibitsPart IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules