FRPH 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2015

q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_________________

FORM 10-Q

_________________

or

Commission File Number: 001-36769

_____________________

FRP HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_____________________

904-396-5733

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  [x]    No  [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  [x]    No  [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  [_]    No  [x]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

FRP HOLDINGS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2015

CONTENTS

Page No.

Preliminary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.

Certain matters discussed in this report contain forward-looking statements, including without limitation relating to the Company's plans, strategies, objectives, expectations, intentions, capital expenditures, future liquidity, plans and timetables for completion of pending development projects and other transactions. The words or phrases “anticipate,” “estimate,” ”believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. The following factors and others discussed in the Company’s periodic reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission are among the principal factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements: uncertainties as to whether the Company will recognize the benefits of the spin-off of the transportation group; uncertainties as to whether the Company can complete, and the timetable for completion of pending or proposed development projects and other transactions; levels of construction activity in the markets served by our mining properties; risk insurance markets; availability and terms of financing; competition; interest rates, inflation and general economic conditions; demand for flexible warehouse/office facilities in the Baltimore-Washington-Northern Virginia area; and ability to obtain zoning and entitlements necessary for property development. However, this list is not a complete statement of all potential risks or uncertainties.

These forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof based on management’s current expectations, and the Company does not undertake an obligation to update such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Additional information regarding these and other risk factors may be found in the Company’s other filings made from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FRP HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Unaudited) (In thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes.

FRP HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(In thousands except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

FRP HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 AND 2014

(In thousands) (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

FRP HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

(Unaudited)

(1) Basis of Presentation . The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FRP Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “FRP”) inclusive of our operating real estate subsidiaries, FRP Development Corp. (“Development”) and Florida Rock Properties, Inc. (”Properties”) subsequent to the completed spin-off (the “Spin-off”) of our transportation assets into a new, publicly traded entity, Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc. (“Patriot”; stock symbol “PATI”) effective January 30, 2015. As a result of the Spin-off the former transportation segment of the Company is reported as a discontinued operation that cannot receive any corporate overhead allocation. Hence, all corporate overhead of the transportation group through the date of the spin-off is included in “corporate expense” on the Company’s consolidated income statements herein. See Note 3 for a breakdown of corporate expenses showing the amounts per the Company’s segments, the unallocated to any segment and the unallocated to discontinued operations. Reclassifications to the appropriate prior period line items and amounts have been made to be comparable to the current presentation. Our investment in the 50% owned Brooksville Joint Venture and in the Riverfront Investment Partners I, LLC are accounted for under the equity method of accounting (See Note 13). These statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (primarily consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and the information included under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2014.

Following the completion of the spin-off of the transportation business on January 30, 2015, management conducted a strategic review of the Company’s real estate operations.  As a result of this review, information that the Company’s chief operating decision maker (its chief executive officer) regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance changed. Therefore, beginning in fiscal year 2015, the Company is reporting its financial performance based on the three reportable segments described below.  Beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 2015, our financial statements reflected the new reporting structure with prior periods adjusted accordingly .

Our Mining and Royalties segment stays the same, but based on our strategic review the Developed Property Rentals segment has been broken down into an Asset Management segment and a Land Development and Construction segment to reflect how management now evaluates the real estate activities previously presented in the Developed Property Rentals segment. The Asset Management segment contains all the developed buildings capable of producing current rental income; the Land Development and Construction segments contains the remaining developable land not yet developed to its eventual highest and best use potential where the Company's focus is to add further entitlements, construct vertical improvements or market the property to third parties all in an effort to bring such property to income producing status or realization of its fair market value through sales or exchange. This Land Development and Construction segment is generally in a pre-income production state where objectives are long term capital investment for eventual production of long-term rental streams or capital investment to achieve highest potential market value for sale to third parties.

(2) Recently Issued Accounting Standards. In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, "Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20) Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items." This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. Effective first quarter 2015, the Company adopted ASU 2015-01 and will apply the new guidance, as applicable.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”, which relates to the financial statement presentation of debt issuance costs. This guidance requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a reduction of the related debt liability rather than an asset. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is permitted and will only result in a change in presentation of these costs on our balance sheets.

(3) Business Segments. The Company operates in three reportable business segments (i) Asset Management and (ii) Mining Royalty Land and (iii) Land Development and Construction. The Asset Management segment owns, leases, manages and operates commercial office/warehouse buildings primarily located in the Baltimore/Northern Virginia/Washington, DC area. The Mining Royalty Land segment owns real estate predominately in Florida and Georgia that is leased to mining companies in exchange for royalty or land rental income. The Land Development and Construction segment acquires, owns, entitles, and develops land to be used for income production via (i) construction by the Company of warehouse/office uses for our Asset Management segment, or (ii) other commercial, residential or mixed use projects through joint ventures or sales to third parties.

Subsequent to the Spin-off, the Company is receiving certain services from Patriot (e.g. executive oversight, accounting, information technology and human resource services) which are billed to the Company on a monthly basis in accordance with the Transition Services Agreement entered into and made effective as of the date of the Spin-off. As was the case prior to the Spin-off, these costs (excluding stock compensation) are included in the Company’s corporate expense and are fully allocated to the business segments. Certain other corporate expenses (primarily stock compensation, corporate aircraft and one-time Spin-off related expenses) are reported as “unallocated” on the Company’s consolidated income statement and are not allocated to any business segment. As a result of the Spin-off the former transportation segment of the Company is reported as a discontinued operation and thus is not allowed any corporate overhead allocation. Hence, all corporate overhead of the transportation group through the date of the Spin-off is included in “corporate expense” on the Company’s consolidated income statements herein. Reclassifications to the appropriate prior period line items and amounts have been made to be comparable to the current presentation.

Operating results and certain other financial data for the Company’s business segments are as follows (in thousands):

(4) Related Party Agreements with Patriot. In order to affect the Spin-off and govern our relationship with Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc. after the Spin-off, we entered into an Employee Matters Agreement and a Transition Services Agreement. The Employee Matters Agreement generally allocates responsibilities to each company for liabilities relating to each company’s current and former employees and allocated responsibilities under employee benefit plans. The Transition Services Agreement sets forth the terms on which Patriot is providing to FRP certain services that were shared prior to the Spin-off, including the services of certain shared executive officers, for a period of 12 or more months after the Spin-off.

The consolidated statements of income reflects charges and/or allocations from Patriot for these services of $924,000 and $525,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, and $2,361,000 and $2,022,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in the charges above are amounts recognized for stock-based executive compensation expense. These charges are reflected within corporate expenses on the consolidated statements of income.

To determine these allocations between FRP and Patriot, we generally employed the same methodology historically used by the Company pre Spin-off to allocate said expenses and thus we believe that the allocations to FRP are a reasonable approximation of the costs related to FRP’s operations but any such related-party transactions cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis as the terms were negotiated while Patriot was still a subsidiary of FRP.

(5)

On January 30, 2015, in connection with the Spin-off, the Company terminated its $55 million credit facility entered into with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in 2012 and simultaneously entered into a new five year credit agreement with Wells Fargo with a maximum facility amount of $20 million and a $10 million sublimit available for standby letters of credit. At September 30, 2014, prior to the Spin-off, the total amount outstanding on the credit facility was $17,645,000 of which the Company was allocated $10,363,000 and Patriot was allocated $7,282,000.  On the day of the spin-off the Company refinanced $10,483,000 into the Company’s new credit facility and Patriot refinanced $5,142,000 into Patriot’s new credit facility. As of June 30, 2015, there was $8,679,000 outstanding on the Company’s new credit facility and $2,610,000 outstanding under letters of credit and $8,711,000 available for borrowing and the Company was in compliance with all its loan covenants.

In January 2015 the Company prepaid the $1,314,000 remaining principal balance on 8.55% and 7.95% mortgages. The prepayment penalty of $116,000 is included in interest expense. The remaining deferred loan costs of $15,000 were also included in interest expense.

The fair values of the Company’s mortgage notes payable were estimated based on current rates available to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. At June 30, 2015, the carrying amount and fair value of such long-term debt was $41,196,000 and $44,475,000, respectively.

(6) Earnings per share. The following details the computations of the basic and diluted earnings per common share (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015, 62,021 and 76,691 shares attributable to outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2014, 24,290 and 31,790 shares attributable to outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

(7) Stock-Based Compensation Plans . As more fully described in Note 7 to the Company’s notes to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company’s stock-based compensation plan permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and stock awards. The number of common shares available for future issuance was 419,170 at June 30, 2015.

As a result of the Spin-off and pursuant to the Employee Matters Agreement, we made certain adjustments to the exercise price and number of outstanding FRP stock options. All outstanding options held by the Company directors, Company officers and key employees on January 30, 2015 were cancelled and replaced by an equal number of FRP options at 75.14% of the previous exercise price based upon the market value of FRP less the when issued market value of the Company on that

day. For FRP officers additional options were issued rather than issuing Patriot options for the 24.86% market value attributed to Patriot. The adjusted stock options are subject to the same vesting conditions and other terms that applied to the original FRP award immediately prior to the Spin-off, except as otherwise described above.

Subsequent to Spin-off, the realized tax benefit pertaining to options exercised and the remaining compensation cost of options previously granted prior to the Spin-off will be recognized by FRP or Patriot based on the employment location of the related employee or director.

T he Company recorded the following stock compensation expense (including unallocated to Patriot in periods prior to the Spin-off) in its consolidated statements of income (in thousands):

A summary of changes in outstanding options is presented below (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable in-the-money options was $2,679,000 and the aggregate intrinsic value of all outstanding in-the-money options was $3,429,000 based on the market closing price of $32.43 on June 30, 2015 less exercise prices.

The realized tax benefit to the Company or Patriot from options exercised in the nine months ended June 30, 2015 was $491,000. The unrecognized compensation cost of options granted but not yet vested as of June 30, 2015 was $755,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.4 years. Gains of $1,268,000 were realized by option holders during the nine months ended June 30, 2015.

(8) Contingent liabilities . Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are involved in litigation on matters and are subject to certain claims which arise in the normal course of business. The Company is fully insured and does not retain any self-insurance risk with respect to losses for third party liability and property damage.

Preliminary testing on the site of the Company's four phase master development known as Riverfront on the Anacostia in Washington, D.C. indicated the presence of contaminated soils that will have to be specially handled upon excavation in conjunction with construction of each phase. The Company previously agreed with our joint venture partner to bear the cost of handling the contaminated materials up to a cap of $1.871 million. In connection with that agreement, the Company recorded an expense in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 of $1.771 million for this environmental remediation liability. As of June 30, 2015, the total estimated cost of remediation on Phase I reached $2.077 million which is still within the projected budget for these remediation expenses as determined by our development partner. As a result, the Company recorded an additional $100,000 expense in the second quarter of 2015 in the Land Development and Construction segment and incurred a loss of $159,000 in equity in joint ventures as a result of our 77% pro rata share of these additional remediation costs incurred within the joint venture.

The Company has no obligation to remediate the contamination on Phases II, III and IV of the development until such time as it makes a commitment to commence construction there. The Company's position is that the prior tenant on the property is contractually responsible for the cost of removal of the contaminated materials and we are continuing to pursue this claim. The Company's actual expense to address this issue may be materially higher or lower than the expense previously recorded depending upon the actual costs incurred and any reimbursement that we receive from the prior tenant.

(9) Concentrations . Our Land Development and Construction and our Asset Management segments operate predominately in the Baltimore/Northern Virginia/Washington DC market area and a significant economic downturn affecting that region could adversely affect our financial results.

Likewise, our Mining Royalty Land segment generates the predominance of its revenue from mines in Florida and Georgia and is subject to the

effects of economic downturns and construction cycles in these markets. Additionally, this segment has one lessee that accounted for 65.0% of the segment’s revenues and $272,000 of accounts receivable at June 30, 2015. The termination of certain of this lessee’s underlying leases or non-performance under the leases could have a material adverse effect on the segment.

The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality institutions. At times, such amounts may exceed FDIC insured limits.

(10) Fair Value Measurements . Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Level 1 means the use of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 means the use of values that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Level 3 means the use of inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis consist of real estate assets and investments that were subject to impairment charges. There were no assets that met these criteria at June 30, 2015 or September 30, 2014. The fair value of all other financial instruments with the exception of mortgage notes (see Note 5) approximates the carrying value due to the short-term nature of such instruments. In addition, we believe the fair value of the amount outstanding pertaining to the revolver approximates the carrying value as the related debt agreement reflects present market terms and contains certain interest rates that reset periodically based on current market indices.

(11) Real Estate Held for Sale . In fiscal 2015, the Company and a buyer executed an amendment to extend the closing for the sale of phase two of the Windlass Run residential sale from March 2015 to August 2015 and increased the sales price by $188,000, to $11,188,000, to compensate the Company for the delay. Management believes this closing will occur on or before August 31, 2015. The book value of the property was $4,791,000 as of June 30, 2015 and is classified as real estate held for sale.

(12) Unusual or Infrequent Items Impacting Quarterly Results.

Operating profit includes expenses of $17,000 and $324,000 in the third quarter and nine months respectively of fiscal 2015 for non-recurring costs related to the Spin-off.

In January 2015 the Company prepaid the $1,314,000 remaining principal balance on 8.55% and 7.95% mortgages. The prepayment penalty of $116,000 is included in interest expense. The remaining deferred loan costs of $15,000 were also included in interest expense.

(13) Investment in Riverfront and Brooksville Joint Ventures.

Riverfront. On March 30, 2012 the Company entered into a Contribution Agreement with MRP SE Waterfront Residential, LLC. (“MRP”) to form a joint venture to develop the first phase only of the four phase master development known as Riverfront on the Anacostia in Washington, D.C. The purpose of the Joint Venture is to develop, own, lease and ultimately sell an approximately 300,000 square foot residential apartment building (including approximately 18,000 square feet of retail) on approximately 2 acres of the roughly 5.82 acre site. The joint venture, Riverfront Investment Partners I, LLC (“Riverfront I”) was formed in June 2013 as contemplated. The Company contributed land with an agreed to value of $13,500,000 (cost basis of $6,165,000) and contributed cash of $4,866,000 to the Joint Venture for a 76.91% stake in the venture. MRP contributed capital of $5,553,000 to the joint venture including development costs paid prior to formation of the joint venture. The Joint Venture closed on $17,000,000 of EB5 secondary financing and a nonrecourse construction loan for $65,000,000 on August 8, 2014. Both these financing sources are non-recourse to FRP. Construction commenced in October 2014. At this point, the Company anticipates lease up to occur in the second half of calendar 2016 and all of 2017. The Company’s equity interest in the joint venture is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as MRP acts as the administrative agent of the joint venture and oversees and controls the day to day operations of the project.

Other income for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 includes a loss of $226,000 representing the Company’s portion of the loss of this joint venture due primarily to expenses incurred in the joint venture with respect to the environmental remediation.

Brooksville. In 2006, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Florida Rock Industries, Inc. (now owned by Vulcan Materials Company) to jointly own and develop approximately 4,300 acres of land near Brooksville, Florida. Under the terms of the joint venture, FRP contributed its fee interest in approximately 3,443 acres formerly leased to Vulcan under a long-term mining lease which had a net book value of $2,548,000. Vulcan is entitled to mine a portion of the property until 2022 and pay royalties to the Company. FRP also contributed $3,018,000 for one-half of the acquisition costs of a 288-acre contiguous parcel. Vulcan contributed 553 acres that it owned as well as its leasehold interest in the 3,443 acres that it leased from FRP and $3,018,000 for one-half of the acquisition costs of the 288-acre contiguous parcel. The joint venture is jointly controlled by Vulcan and FRP, and they each have a mandatory obligation to fund

additional capital contributions of up to $2,380,000. Capital contributions of $2,347,000 have been made by each party as of June 30, 2015. Distributions will be made on a 50-50 basis except for royalties and depletion specifically allocated to the Company. Other income for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 includes a loss of $29,000 representing the Company’s portion of the loss of this joint venture. In April 2011, the Florida Department of Community Affairs issued its Final Order approving the development of the Project, and zoning for the Project was obtained from Hernando County in August 2012. We will continue to monitor the residential market in Hernando County and pursue opportunities to partner with a master community developer or major homebuilder to commence construction when the market dictates.

Real estate revenues included $237,000 of royalties from the mining activities on this property in the nine months ended June 30, 2015 and $156,000 in nine months ended June 30, 2014. Allocated depletion expense of $6,000 was included in real estate cost of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2015.

Investments in Joint Ventures (in thousands):

Summarized Unaudited Financial Information for the Investments in Joint Ventures (in thousands):

(14) Discontinued operations.

Effective January 30, 2015, we spun off our transportation assets into a new, publicly traded entity, Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc. The Company has accounted for the Patriot operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Shareholders’ equity was reduced by $34,241,000 due to this distribution on January 30, 2015. Comprehensive income of $40,000 was included in that amount.

The results of operations associated with discontinued operations for the three month and nine month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands):

The components of the balance sheet at September 30, 2014 are as follows (in thousands):

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial information and related notes that appear in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion also presents net operating income (“NOI”), a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Regulation G”) to supplement the financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. FRP uses this metric to analyze its continuing operations and to monitor, assess, and identify meaningful trends in its operating and financial performance. This measure is not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for GAAP financial measures. Refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a more detailed discussion, including a reconciliation of NOI to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

Overview – This section provides management's discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of FRP Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 as well as the first nine months of fiscal year 2015.

On January 30, 2015, FRP Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq GM: FRPH) (the “Company”) completed the spin-off of its transportation business into a new, separately traded public company - Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc. (Nasdaq GM: PATI) (“Patriot”) - resulting in FRPH becoming a pure real estate company. As a result, the former transportation segment is reported as a discontinued operation without any corporate overhead allocation. Hence, all corporate overhead of the transportation group through the date of the spin-off is included in “corporate expense” on the Company’s historical consolidated income statements.

In the third quarter, the Company reported net income from continuing operations of $2,047,000 or $.21 per diluted share, an increase of $293,000 over the same quarter last year.

For the first nine months of this fiscal year, the Company reported net income from continuing operations of $4,022,000 or $.41 per diluted share, an increase of $185,000 from the same period last year.

Following the completion of the spin-off of the transportation business on January 30, 2015, management conducted a strategic review of the Company’s real estate operations.  As a result of this review, information that the Company’s chief operating decision maker (its chief executive officer) regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance changed. Therefore, beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 2015 (with prior periods adjusted accordingly), the Company reports its financial performance based on the three reportable segments, Asset Management, Mining Royalty Lands

and Land Development and Construction, as described below.

Our Mining and Royalties segment remains unaffected, but our Developed Property Rentals segment has been broken down into an Asset Management segment and a Land Development and Construction segment to reflect how management now evaluates the real estate activities previously presented in the Developed Property Rentals segment. The Asset Management segment contains all the developed buildings capable of producing current rental income; the Land Development and Construction segments contains the remaining developable land not yet developed to its eventual highest and best use potential where the Company's focus is to add further entitlements, construct vertical improvements or market the property to third parties all in an effort to bring such property to income producing status or realization of its fair market value through sales or exchange. This Land Development and Construction segment includes land that is generally in a pre-income production state where objectives are long term capital investment for eventual production of long-term rental streams or capital investment to achieve highest potential market value for sale to third parties.

The Company’s operations are influenced by a number of external and internal factors. External factors include levels of economic and industrial activity in the United States and the Southeast, construction activity and costs, aggregates sales by lessees from the Company’s mining properties, interest rates, market conditions in the Baltimore/Northern Virginia/Washington DC area, and our ability to obtain zoning and entitlements necessary for property development. Internal factors include administrative costs and group health claims experience. Financial results of the Company for any individual quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year.

Asset Management Segment.

The Asset Management segment owns, leases and manages warehouse/office buildings located predominately in the Baltimore/Northern Virginia/Washington, DC market area.  We focus primarily on owning flexible type facilities that cater to the maximum number of tenant types. As most of our buildings are less than 150,000 square feet, we focus on local and regional vs. national tenants. Hands-on service provided by our in-house construction and property management teams keeps us close to our tenant base. These practices are the cornerstone of our mission to provide the highest quality product and services at competitive rates resulting in tenant satisfaction and ultimately, retention.

These assets create revenue and cash flows through tenant rental payments, lease management fees and reimbursements for building operating costs. The major cash outlays incurred in this segment are for operating expenses, real estate taxes, building repairs, lease commissions and other lease closing costs, construction of tenant improvements, capital to acquire existing operating buildings and

closing costs related thereto and personnel costs of our property management team. Most of these buildings were constructed by us through our Land Development and Construction segment. Additionally, over the years, we have opportunistically acquired existing operating buildings, typically in connection with a deferred like-kind (Section 1031) exchange opportunity.  Today, this segment consists of just over 3.6 million square feet.

Management focuses on several factors to measure our success on a comparative basis in this segment. The major factors we focus on are (1) revenue growth, (2) growth in occupied square feet, (3) actual occupancy rate, (4) average annual occupied square feet, (5) average annual occupancy rate (defined as the occupied sf at the end of each month during a fiscal year divided by the number of months to date in that fiscal year as a percentage of the average number of square feet in the portfolio over that same time period), (6) growth of our portfolio (in square feet), and (7) tenant retention success rate (as a percentage of total square feet to be renewed).

Mining Royalty Lands Segment.

Our Mining Royalty Lands segment owns 14 properties comprising approximately 15,000 acres currently under lease for mining rents or royalties (this does not include the 4,280 acres owned in our Brooksville joint venture with Vulcan Materials).  Other than one location in Virginia, all of these properties are located in Florida and Georgia.  The typical lease in this segment requires the tenant to pay us a royalty based on the number of tons of mined materials sold from our property during a given fiscal year multiplied by a percentage of the average annual sales price per ton sold. As a result of this royalty payment structure, we do not bear the cost risks associated with the mining operations, however, we are subject to the cyclical nature of the construction markets in these States as both volumes and prices tend to fluctuate through those cycles. In certain locations, typically where the reserves on our property have been depleted but the tenant still has a need for the leased land, we collect a fixed annual rental amount. We believe strongly in the potential for future growth in construction in Florida and Georgia which would directly benefit our profitability in this segment.

The major expenses in this segment are comprised of collection and accounting for royalties, management’s oversight of the mining leases, land entitlement for post-mining uses and property taxes at our non-leased locations and at our Grandin location which, unlike our other leased mining locations, are not paid by the tenant.  As such, our costs in this business are very low as a percentage of revenue, are relatively stable and are not affected by increases in production at our locations. Our current mining tenants include Vulcan Materials, Martin Marietta and Cemex, among others.

Additionally, these locations provide us with excellent opportunities for valuable “2nd lives” for these assets through proper land planning and entitlement. Examples of this are (i) the 4,200 acre Brooksville, Florida property that we recently entitled as a development of regional impact for a large mixed-use development with our joint venture partner, Vulcan Materials, (ii) the 105 waterfront lots approved for future development at our Ft. Myers, Florida location (iii) the mined out Gulf Hammock quarry, approximately 1,600 acres inclusive of several large lakes resulting from the mining operations, which we currently have listed for sale and (iv) our Lakeside Business park in Maryland which at one time was a 135 acre sand and gravel mining operation.

Land Development and Construction Segment.

Through our Land Development and Construction segment, we own and are continuously monitoring for their “highest and best use” several parcels of land that are in various stages of development.  Our overall strategy in this segment is to convert all of our non-income producing lands into income production through (i) an orderly process of constructing new warehouse/office buildings for us to own and operate or (ii) a sale to, or joint venture with, third parties.

Revenues in this segment are generated predominately from land sales and interim property rents. The significant cash outlays incurred in this segment are for land acquisition costs, entitlement costs, property taxes, design and permitting, the personnel costs of our in-house management team and horizontal and vertical construction costs.

Since 1990, one of our primary strategies in this segment has been to acquire, entitle and ultimately develop commercial/industrial business parks providing 5–15 building pads which we typically convert into warehouse/office buildings. To date, our management team has converted 26 of these pads into developed buildings that we continue to own and manage through the Asset Management segment. Our typical practice has been to transfer these assets to the Asset Management segment on the earlier to occur of (i) commencement of rental revenue or (ii) issuance of the certificate of occupancy. We have also opportunistically sold several of these pad sites over time to third party “users”.

The remaining pad sites in our inventory today are fully entitled, located in business parks in four different submarkets in the

DC/Baltimore/Northern Virginia area, and can support an additional 1.2 million sf. of warehouse/office buildings.

Summary of Our Remaining Lot Inventory:

We completed a third build-to-suit building for the same tenant at our Patriot Business Park and transferred that asset to the Asset Management segment on or about November 2014 when the building was approved for occupancy. We also submitted plans for vertical construction for one warehouse/office building at each of our Hollander and Windlass Run business parks and are now under construction on an 80,000 sf spec building at Hollander Business Park. Having sites ready for vertical construction has rewarded us in the past.  It is the main reason why we were able to convert 3 of our finished pads at Patriot Business Park into build-to-suit opportunities in 2012, 2013 and 2014.  We will continue to actively monitor these submarkets where we have lots ready for construction and take advantage of the opportunities presented to us.

In addition to the inventory of finished building lots, we have several other properties that were either spun-off to us from Florida Rock Industries in 1986 or acquired by us from unrelated 3rd parties.  These properties, as a result of our “highest and best use” studies, are being prepared for income generation through sale or joint venture with third parties, and in certain cases we are leasing these properties on an interim basis for an income stream while we wait for the development market to ripen.

Our strategy when selling parcels outright is to attempt to convert the proceeds into income producing real estate for our Asset Management segment through a Section 1031 tax-deferred exchange. An example of this would be the Windlass Run residential land whereby we sold phase 1 for $8 million and used the proceeds in a Section 1031

exchange to acquire our Transit Business Park in 2013.

An example of property in this segment being developed through joint venture is Phase I of our Riverfront on the Anacostia project which was contributed to a joint venture with MRP in 2014 and is now under construction as a 305 unit apartment building including 18,000 sf of ground floor retail.

As of June 30, 2015, we have one property in this segment (Windlass Run residential phase II) under contract for sale and expect that transaction to close on or before August 31, 2015 for $11,188,000. In second quarter, we entered into a long term ground lease on a 3.6 acre parcel at our Hollander business park for use by the tenant as a compressed natural gas filling station. Rent will commence when all of the entitlements are complete and the facility placed into service, estimated to be during the 4 ^th quarter of fiscal 2015. We will continue to hold this property in this segment as Management believes it is not appropriate to move it to the Asset Management segment with only a ground lease in place as it still has potential for a second life as an improved building post ground lease.

Significant Investment Lands Inventory:

RIVERFRONT ON THE ANACOSTIA:

This property consists of 5.8 acres on the Anacostia River and is immediately adjacent to the Washington National’s baseball park in the SE Central Business District of Washington, DC.  Once zoned for industrial use and under a ground lease, this property is no longer under lease and has been re-zoned for the construction of

approximately 1.1M square feet of “mixed-use” development in four phases.  In 2014, approximately 2.1 acres (Phase I) of the total 5.8 acres was contributed to a joint venture owned by the Company (77%) and our partner, MRP Realty (23%), and construction commenced in October, 2014 on a 305 unit residential apartment building with approximately 18,000 sq. ft. of first floor retail space.  Lease up is expected to commence in 2016 and continue through 2017. Phases II, III and IV are slated for residential, office, and hotel/residential buildings, respectively, all with permitted first floor retail uses. In accordance with our Master Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval, the next step for development of Phase II requires us to submit plans to the Zoning Commission for final design approval within two years of issuance of the construction permit for Phase I (i.e. by December of 2016).

WINDLASS RUN RESIDENTIAL:

We originally purchased this 179 acre tract for $5.2 million in 2002.  When purchased, the entire parcel was zoned for commercial/industrial uses.  Today, some 70 acres of this original tract makes up our Windlass Run Business Park.  We successfully rezoned the remaining acreage for medium density residential development and on April 17, 2013, we entered into a contract to sell the residential portion of the property for $19 million. Phase I of the sale closed within the quarter ending September 30, 2013 for $8.0 million and the proceeds of this sale were used in a Section 1031 exchange to acquire the Transit Business Park.  Phase II of the sale is scheduled for settlement in August 2015 for $11 million.

HAMPSTEAD TRADE CENTER: We purchased this 117 acre tract in 2005 for $4.3 million in a Section 1031 exchange with plans of developing it as a commercial business park. The “great recession” caused us to reassess our plans for this property. As a result, Management determined that the prudent course of action is to attempt to rezone the property for residential uses and sell the entire tract to another developer such that we can redeploy this capital into an asset with more near-term income producing potential. Residential studies are on-going today.

SQUARE 664E, WASHINGTON, DC

This property sits on the Anacostia River at the base of South Capitol Street in an area named Buzzard Point, approximately 1 mile down river from our RiverFront on the Anacostia property. The Square 664E property consists of approximately 2 acres and is currently under lease to Vulcan Materials for use as a concrete batch plant. The lease terminates on August 31, 2021 and Vulcan has the option to renew for one additional period of five (5) years. In the quarter ending December 31, 2014, the District of Columbia announced that it had selected Buzzard Point for the future site of the new DC United major league soccer stadium. The selected stadium location, consisting of approximately 5 acres of land, is separated from our property by just one small industrial lot and two side streets.

Comparative Results of Operations for the Three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Results

Net income from continuing operations was $2,047,000, up 16.7% from the same quarter last year. Total revenues for the Company were $8,497,000, up 11%, over the same quarter last year. Our operating profit improved to $3,889,000, a 36% increase over the same quarter last year.

Post Spin-off we are reporting any net gain/(loss) from the transportation business as “discontinued operations” and we currently have no other discontinued operations being reported. In the quarter we received no benefit to after tax net income versus a $1,731,000 benefit in the same quarter last year. GAAP accounting rules do not allow corporate overhead expense to be allocated to a discontinued operation of the Company which resulted in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 including an additional $528,000 of corporate overhead expense to the Company that was associated with the discontinued transportation operations.

The improvement in results is mostly attributable to the addition of the third build-to-suit building at Patriot Business Park and improved volumes at several of our mining locations somewhat offset by increases in (i) depreciation expense due to the addition of the third build-to-suit at Patriot Business Park, (ii) non-reimbursed property taxes (at our Anacostia property), and (iii) higher interest expense as a result of less capitalized interest in this quarter.

The Company’s interest expense increased by $49,000 this quarter due to less debt outstanding and less capitalized interest in this quarter versus the same quarter last year as a result of the completion of construction activities at Patriot Business Park.

Asset Management Segment Results

Highlights of the Third Quarter 2015:

• Revenue up $427,000, or 7%, over the same quarter last year due to the addition of income producing square feet to our portfolio.
• Operating profit was up $310,000, or 11%, over the same quarter last year.