FTAI 10-Q Quarterly Report Sept. 30, 2015 | Alphaminr
Fortress Transportation & Infrastructure Investors LLC
ALPHAMINR

FTAI 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015

Balance Sheet
Cash Flow
Income Statement
Debt
FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2025
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2015
PROXIES
DEF 14A
Filed on May 29, 2025
DEF 14A
Filed on April 16, 2025
DEF 14A
Filed on May 29, 2024
DEF 14A
Filed on April 12, 2024
DEF 14A
Filed on May 25, 2023
DEF 14A
Filed on April 11, 2023
DEF 14A
Filed on May 26, 2022
DEF 14A
Filed on April 14, 2022
DEF 14A
Filed on April 16, 2021
DEF 14A
Filed on April 28, 2020
DEF 14A
Filed on April 9, 2019
DEF 14A
Filed on April 18, 2018
DEF 14A
Filed on April 19, 2017
DEF 14A
Filed on May 6, 2016
10-Q 1 ftai0930201510-q.htm Q315 10-Q 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ____
Commission file number 001-37386
FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter )

Delaware
32-0434238
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1345 Avenue of the Americas, 46th Floor,
New York, NY
10105
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) (212) 798-6100
_______________________________________________
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer þ
Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
There were 75,718,183 common shares representing limited liability company interests outstanding at November 4, 2015 .



FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
Item 1.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.

2





FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

Notes
September 30,
2015
December 31, 2014
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents

$
448,299

$
22,125

Restricted cash
2
16,169

21,084

Accounts receivable, net

11,849

9,588

Leasing equipment, net
4
616,019

509,379

Finance leases, net
5
85,401

102,813

Property, plant, and equipment, net
6
294,352

227,381

Investment in and advances to unconsolidated entity
7
11,370

21,569

Tendered bonds
9
—

298,000

Intangible assets, net
8
46,648

52,169

Goodwill
3
116,584

116,584

Other assets

35,445

24,048

Total assets
$
1,682,136

$
1,404,740

Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$
32,367

$
43,174

Debt
9
274,942

592,867

Maintenance deposits

30,001

35,575

Security deposits

15,950

13,622

Other liabilities

8,066

6,005

Total liabilities

361,326

691,243

Commitments and contingencies
17


Equity
Common shares ($0.01 par value per share; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized; 75,718,183 and 53,502,873 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)

757

535

Additional paid in capital

1,209,183

613,683

Accumulated deficit


(14,070
)

—

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

(16
)
214

Shareholders' equity

1,195,854

614,432

Non-controlling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiaries

124,956

99,065

Total equity

1,320,810

713,497

Total liabilities and equity

$
1,682,136

$
1,404,740






See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


3



FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Notes
2015
2014
2015
2014
Revenues
Equipment leasing revenues
$
24,360

$
10,571

$
70,031

$
28,018

Infrastructure revenues
10,873

5,509

32,739

6,493

Total revenues
11
35,233

16,080

102,770

34,511

Expenses
Operating expenses
17,879

9,360

50,198

12,705

General and administrative
2,568

401

4,905

1,349

Acquisition and transaction expenses

2,206

808

4,172

11,281

Management fees and incentive allocation to affiliate
14
4,606

1,698

10,505

3,535

Depreciation and amortization
4, 6, 8
11,548

4,118

32,875

8,741

Interest expense

4,668

1,348

14,240

2,920

Total expenses
43,475

17,733

116,895

40,531

Other income (expense)
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated entities
7
(9,584
)
1,700

(7,118
)
4,831

Gain on sale of equipment, net
1,746

1,849

2,037

4,064

Interest income
159

52

462

66

Other income, net
15

154

6

134

Total other income (expense)
(7,664
)
3,755

(4,613
)
9,095

(Loss) Income before income taxes
(15,906
)
2,102

(18,738
)
3,075

Provision for income taxes
13
150

156

646

714

Net (loss) income
(16,056
)
1,946

(19,384
)
2,361

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries
(4,318
)
(2,085
)
(12,257
)
(1,744
)
Net (loss) income attributable to shareholders
$
(11,738
)
$
4,031

$
(7,127
)
$
4,105

(Loss) Earnings per Share:
16
Basic and Diluted

$
(0.16
)
$
0.08

$
(0.11
)
$
0.08

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

Basic

75,718,183

53,502,873

64,114,734

53,502,873

Diluted

75,718,183

53,502,873

64,114,734

53,502,873



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


4



FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Net (loss) income
$
(16,056
)
$
1,946

$
(19,384
)
$
2,361

Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge
(94
)
116

(230
)
(25
)
Comprehensive (loss) income
$
(16,150
)
$
2,062

$
(19,614
)
$
2,336

Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest
$
(4,318
)
$
(2,085
)
$
(12,257
)
$
(1,744
)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to shareholders
$
(11,832
)
$
4,147

$
(7,357
)
$
4,080













































See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5



FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)


Common Stock
Additional Paid In Capital
Accumulated Deficit
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Non-Controlling Interest in Equity of Consolidated Subsidiaries
Total Equity
Equity - December 31, 2014
$
535

$
613,683

$
—

$
214

$
99,065

$
713,497



Comprehensive (loss) income:

Net (loss) income for the period


6,943

(14,070
)


(12,257
)
(19,384
)
Other comprehensive loss






(230
)
—

(230
)
Total comprehensive loss
(12,257
)
(19,614
)
Capital contributions


295,879





34,787

330,666

Capital distributions


(44,917
)




(309
)
(45,226
)
Issuance of common shares
222

348,929





—

349,151

Dividends declared


(11,358
)




—

(11,358
)
Equity-based compensation


24





3,670

3,694

Equity - September 30, 2015
$
757

$
1,209,183

$
(14,070
)
$
(16
)
$
124,956

$
1,320,810







































See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6



FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015
2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income
$
(19,384
)
$
2,361

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in loss (earnings) of unconsolidated entities
7,118

(4,831
)
Gain on sale of equipment
(2,037
)
(4,064
)
Security deposits and maintenance claims included in earnings
(439
)
—

Equity-based compensation
3,694

284

Depreciation and amortization
32,875

8,741

Change in current and deferred income taxes
127

714

Change in fair value of non-hedge derivative
14

19

Amortization of lease intangibles and incentives
5,380

1,652

Amortization of deferred financing costs
1,101

188

Operating distributions from unconsolidated entities
160

6,942

Bad debt expense
255

175

Other
(362
)
(9
)
Change in:
Accounts receivable
(2,718
)
(4,917
)
Other assets
(3,540
)
(4,365
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
4,109

(32,884
)
Management fees payable to affiliate
(1,207
)
434

Other liabilities
1,724

1,774

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
26,870

(27,786
)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Change in restricted cash
4,915

(6,120
)
Investment in notes receivable
(10,776
)
—

Construction deposit related to vessel
—

(3,725
)
Principal collections on finance leases
17,412

9,028

Acquisition of leasing equipment
(136,672
)
(215,770
)
Acquisition of property plant and equipment
(88,068
)
(16,038
)
Acquisition of lease intangibles
(2,447
)
(3,745
)
Acquisition of CMQR
—

(11,308
)
Acquisition of Jefferson Terminal
—

(47,811
)
Acquisition of pre-existing debt relationships
—

(97,616
)
Purchase deposit for aircraft and aircraft engines
(250
)
(7,427
)
Proceeds from sale of leasing equipment
9,000

18,975

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
253

428

Proceeds from sale of equipment held for sale
—

135

Return of capital distributions from unconsolidated entities
2,921

6,307

Net cash used in investing activities
$
(203,712
)
$
(374,687
)


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

7



FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015
2014
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from debt
$
200

$
175,349

Repayment of debt
(19,764
)
(26,886
)
Payment of deferred financing costs
—

(4,793
)
Receipt of security deposits
1,695

1,974

Return of security deposits
(710
)
(500
)
Receipt of maintenance deposits
7,127

2,274

Release of maintenance deposits
(10,673
)
—

Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of underwriter's discount
354,057

—

Common shares issuance costs
(2,998
)
—

Capital contributions from shareholders
295,879

290,930

Capital distributions to shareholders
(44,917
)
(43,410
)
Capital contributions from non-controlling interests
34,787

43,612

Capital distributions to non-controlling interests
(309
)
(422
)
Cash dividends paid
(11,358
)
—

Net cash provided by financing activities
603,016

438,128

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
426,174

35,655

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
22,125

7,236

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
448,299

$
42,891

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Acquisition of leasing equipment
$
(1,083
)
$
(25,748
)
Acquisition of CMQR
$
—

$
(2,991
)
Acquisition of Jefferson
$
—

$
(38,207
)
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
$
(59
)
$
(5,000
)
Settled and assumed security deposits
$
2,463

$
940

Billed, assumed and settled maintenance deposits
$
(2,710
)
$
13,042

Non-cash contribution of non-controlling interest
$
—

$
38,207

Common share issuance costs
$
(1,908
)
$
—

Change in fair value of cash flow hedge
$
(230
)
$
(25
)











See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

8

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)




1.
ORGANIZATION
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (the “Company”) is a Delaware limited liability company which, through its subsidiary, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure General Partnership (the “Partnership”), is engaged in the ownership and leasing of aviation equipment, offshore energy equipment and shipping containers, and also owns and operates a short line railroad in North America, Central Maine and Québec Railway (“CMQR”), and a multi-modal crude oil and refined products terminal in Beaumont, Texas (“Jefferson Terminal”). The Company has five reportable segments, Aviation Leasing, Offshore Energy, Shipping Containers, Jefferson Terminal and Railroad, which operate in two primary businesses, Equipment Leasing and Infrastructure (Note 15).
The Company is managed by FIG LLC (the “Manager”), an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC (“Fortress”), pursuant to a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) which provides for the Company to bear obligations for management fees and expense reimbursements payable to the Manager (Note 14).
At December 31, 2014 , through their investment in the Company, the beneficial owners of the Partnership were Fortress Worldwide Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LP (the “Onshore Fund”), with an 89.97% interest and Fortress Worldwide Transportation and Infrastructure Offshore LP (the “Offshore Fund”) with a 9.98% interest; in addition, Fortress Worldwide Transportation and Infrastructure Master GP LLP (the “Master GP”) holds a 0.05% interest. The Master GP is owned by an affiliate of Fortress. The Onshore Fund and the Offshore Fund (collectively, the “Initial Shareholders”) are investment vehicles which are sponsored by Fortress. The general partner of the Onshore Fund and the Offshore Fund is an affiliate of Fortress.
Initial Public Offering (“IPO”)
In May 2015, the remaining capital commitments of the investors of the Onshore Fund, Offshore Fund and Master GP were called.  Through a series of transactions, (i) the Master GP contributed its rights to previously undistributed incentive allocations pursuant to the partnership agreement in exchange for the limited partnership interests in the Onshore Fund and the Offshore Fund equal to the amount of any such undistributed incentive allocations and (ii) 53,502,873 common shares were issued to the Onshore Fund and Offshore Fund based on their relative interests in the Company.
On May 20, 2015, the Company completed an IPO of 20 million common shares at a price to the public of $17.00 per share. On June 15, 2015, the underwriters exercised their overallotment option, pursuant to which the Company issued an additional 2.2 million shares to such underwriters at the IPO price. At September 30, 2015 , the Company was owned 29.3% by public shareholders and 70.7% by the Initial Shareholders.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Accounting —-The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information. Certain information or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2014 has been derived from audited financial statements but does not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. The operating results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. The interim financial information contained herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2014 included in Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2015.
Principles of Consolidation —The Company consolidates all entities in which it has a controlling financial interest and in which it has control over significant operating decisions, as well as variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The ownership interest of other investors in consolidated subsidiaries is recorded as non-controlling interest.

9

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



The Company uses the equity method of accounting for investments in entities in which the Company exercises significant influence but which do not meet the requirements for consolidation. Under the equity method, the Company records its proportionate share of the underlying net income (loss) of these entities.
Variable Interest Entities —The assessment of whether an entity is a VIE and the determination of whether to consolidate a VIE requires judgment. VIEs are defined as entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. A VIE is required to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary, and only by its primary beneficiary, which is defined as the party who has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and who has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
The VIE in which the Company has an interest is WWTAI IES MT6015 Ltd. (“MT6015”), an entity formed in 2014 which has entered into a contract with a shipbuilder for the construction of an offshore multi service / inspection, maintenance and repair vessel (the “Vessel”) for a price of approximately $75 million . A subsidiary of the Company and a third party each hold a 50% interest in MT6015 and have equal representation on its board of directors. In connection with the initial capitalization of MT6015, another subsidiary of the Company provided the partner with a $3,725 loan which was utilized by the partner to fund its equity contribution to MT6015. In addition, the agreement provides the Company with disproportionate voting rights, in certain situations, as defined in the agreement. Accordingly, the Company determined that MT6015 is a VIE and that it was the primary beneficiary; accordingly, MT6015 has been presented on a consolidated basis in the accompanying financial statements.
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , MT6015 had total assets of $7,533 and $7,450 , respectively, which are available only to settle the obligations of MT6015. Other than entering into the above commitment, MT6015 has conducted no operations, and no creditors of MT6015 have recourse to any assets or to the general credit of the Company.
Reclassifications —Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Use of Estimates —The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Risks and Uncertainties —In the normal course of business, the Company encounters several significant types of economic risk including credit, market, and capital market risks. Credit risk is the risk of the inability or unwillingness of a lessee, customer, or derivative counterparty to make contractually required payments or to fulfill its other contractual obligations. Market risk reflects the risk of a downturn or volatility in the underlying industry segments in which the Company operates which could adversely impact the pricing of the services offered by the Company or a lessee’s or customer’s ability to make payments, increase the risk of unscheduled lease terminations and depress lease rates and the value of the Company’s leasing equipment or operating assets. Capital market risk is the risk that the Company is unable to obtain capital at reasonable rates to fund the growth of its business or to refinance existing debt facilities. The Company, through its subsidiaries, also conducts operations outside of the United States; such international operations are subject to the same risks as those associated with its United States operations as well as additional risks, including unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, heightened risk of political and economic instability, potentially adverse tax consequences and the burden of complying with foreign laws. The Company does not have significant exposure to foreign currency risk as all of its leasing arrangements, terminal services revenue and the majority of freight rail revenue are denominated in U.S. dollars.
Restricted Cash —Restricted cash of $16,169 and $21,084 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively, consists of cash held in segregated accounts pursuant to the requirements of the Company’s debt agreements (Note 9).
Goodwill —The Company reviews the carrying values of goodwill at least annually to assess impairment since these assets are not amortized. An annual impairment review is conducted as of October 1st of each year. Additionally, the Company reviews the carrying value of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The determination of fair value involves significant management judgment. Impairment is expensed when incurred. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , there was no impairment of goodwill.
Concentration of Credit Risk —The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk with respect to amounts due from customers on its finance leases and operating leases. The Company attempts to limit its credit risk by performing

10

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



ongoing credit evaluations. During the three months ended September 30, 2015 , the Company earned approximately 11.7% of its revenue from one customer in the offshore energy segment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , the Company earned approximately 23.1% of its revenue from two customers, one each in the offshore energy and Jefferson Terminal segments. During the three months ended September 30, 2014 , the Company earned approximately 25.6% of its revenue from two customers, one each in the aviation leasing and offshore energy segments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 , the Company earned approximately 51.5% of its revenue from four customers in the following segments: two in aviation leasing, one in shipping containers, and one in offshore energy. As of September 30, 2015 , accounts receivable from two customers in the offshore segment each represented 17.6% and 17.2% of total accounts receivable, net. As of December 31, 2014 , the Company had accounts receivable from one customer in the offshore segment that represented 11.7% of total accounts receivable, net.
The Company maintains cash and restricted cash balances, which generally exceed federally insured limits, and subject the Company to credit risk, in high credit quality financial institutions. The Company monitors the financial condition of these institutions and has not experienced any losses associated with these accounts.
Provision for Doubtful Accounts —The Company determines the provision for doubtful accounts based on its assessment of the collectability of its receivables on a customer-by-customer basis. The provision for doubtful accounts at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $73 and $111 , respectively. Bad debt expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $96 and $255 , respectively. Bad debt expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $ 132 and $175 , respectively.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) —Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding those resulting from investments by and distributions to owners. The Company’s comprehensive income (loss) represents net income (loss), as presented in the consolidated Statements of Operations, adjusted for fair value changes related to derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges and the Company’s pro-rata share of items of comprehensive income derived from investments in unconsolidated entities.
The Company had reclassification adjustments of $32 and $104 , which impacted accumulated other comprehensive income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , the Company had reclassification adjustments of $ 42 and $ 130 , respectively.
Derivative Financial Instruments— In the normal course of business the Company may utilize interest rate derivatives to manage its exposure to interest rate risks, principally related to the hedging of variable rate interest payments on various debt facilities. If certain conditions are met, an interest rate derivative may be specifically designated as a cash flow hedge. In connection with its debt obligations (Note 9), the Company has entered into one interest rate derivative designated as a cash flow hedge and one non-hedge derivative. The Company does not enter into speculative derivative transactions. Derivative assets of $4 and $232 , as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively, were recorded within other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. A derivative liability of $16 as of September 30, 2015 has been recorded within accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On the date that the Company enters into an interest rate derivative, its designation as a cash flow hedge is formally documented. On an ongoing basis, an assessment is made as to whether the interest rate derivative has been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the variable rate interest payments on the associated debt and whether the interest rate derivative is expected to remain highly effective in future periods. If it were to be determined that the interest rate derivative is not (or has ceased to be) highly effective as a cash flow hedge, the use of hedge accounting would be discontinued prospectively.
All interest rate derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. For interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the interest rate derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the interest payments on the debt are recorded in earnings. The ineffective portion of the interest rate derivative, if any, is calculated and recorded in interest expense. Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivatives are recorded in earnings on a current basis. The estimated net amount of existing losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2015 expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months is approximately $70 .
In the event of a termination of an interest rate derivative prior to its contractual maturity, any related net gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date of termination would be reclassified into earnings, unless it remains probable that interest payments on the debt will continue to occur, in which case the amount in

11

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



accumulated other comprehensive income would be reclassified into earnings as the interest payments on the debt affect earnings.
Other Investment— During the three months ended September 30, 2015 , the Company invested $10,776 in a terminal site under development. The notes receivable has been recorded within Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet within the Corporate segment as of September 30, 2015 .
Recent Accounting Pronouncements — In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which changes the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The standard states that a strategic shift should include a disposal of (i) major geographical area of operations, (ii) a major line of business, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity. ASU 2014-08 is effective prospectively for new disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 14, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2014-08 beginning January 1, 2015, which had no impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Unadopted Accounting Pronouncements —
The FASB has recently issued or discussed a number of proposed standards on such topics as leases, financial instruments and hedging. Some of the proposed changes are significant and could have a material impact on the Company’s financial reporting. The Company has not yet fully evaluated the potential impact of these proposals, but will make such an evaluation as the standards are finalized.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU-2014-09”) which provides a single comprehensive model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers and supersedes existing revenue recognition guidance. The new standard requires that a company recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. Companies will need to use more judgment and estimates than under the guidance currently in effect, including estimating the amount of variable revenue to recognize over each identified performance obligation. Additional disclosures will be required to help users of financial statements understand the nature, amount and timing of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year, making it effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 while also providing for early adoption but not before the original effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”). ASU 2015-02 amends the consolidation guidance for VIEs and general partners’ investments in limited partnerships and modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. ASU 2015-03 should be applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each period presented should be adjusted to reflect the effects of adoption. The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) ("ASU 2015-15"). ASU 2015-15 provides further guidance related to the presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements.  ASU 2015-15 allows companies to defer and present debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortize the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings of the line-of-credit arrangement. The guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those

12

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



fiscal years with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations- Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement- Period Adjustments ("ASU 2015-16") . ASU 2015-16 requires an acquirer in a business combination to recognize adjustments to the initial purchase accounting that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments in this update require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. ASU No. 2015-16 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
3.
ACQUISITIONS
JEFFERSON TERMINAL
The Company, through its subsidiaries, acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Jefferson Refinery, LLC, Port of Beaumont Petroleum Transload Terminal I, LLC, and Port of Beaumont Petroleum Transload Terminal II, LLC (collectively “Jefferson Terminal”). Jefferson Terminal is comprised of complementary energy logistics assets and is headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas. Its principal operations are to engage in the business of terminalling, storage, throughput and transloading of crude oil and petroleum products. The acquisition of Jefferson Terminal was consummated on August 27, 2014.
Jefferson Terminal was purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $607.8 million , including assumed liabilities of $522.0 million (of which $97.6 million relates to pre-existing debt relationships) and equity consideration of $38.2 million . The Company owns an approximately 60% interest in Jefferson Terminal. The remaining approximately 40% interest in Jefferson Terminal is owned by a portion of the retaining shareholders and a private equity fund sponsored by Fortress, each holding an interest of approximately 20% and accounted for as non-controlling interests in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In connection with the acquisition, a $100 million loan was also obtained (Note 9). The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination under ASC 805 Business Combinations and the results of operations of the acquired business of Jefferson Terminal have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition. Subsequent to the acquisition, measurement period adjustments as of the acquisition date were made to decrease construction in progress within property, plant, and equipment, net by $947 , increase intangible assets, net by $ 128 , increase goodwill by $1,358 , increase accounts payable and accrued liabilities assumed by $390 and increase other liabilities assumed by $ 149 .

Supplementary Pro Forma Information — The unaudited pro forma information has been derived from the Company's historical consolidated financial statements and has been prepared to give effect to the acquisition, assuming that the acquisition of Jefferson Terminal occurred on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma pre-tax net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 have been adjusted to reflect the additional depreciation and amortization that would have resulted from changes in the estimated fair value of assets and liabilities.

Pro forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Accordingly, the unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative or either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2013.

Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Revenues
$
17,006

$
37,158

Pre-tax net loss
$
(2,244
)
$
(37,585
)

During three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recognized $1,539 and $1,539 in revenue, respectively, and $2,231 and $7,457 in loss before taxes, respectively, which includes acquisition and transaction related expenses of $284 and $5,414 , respectively.

13

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



4.
LEASING EQUIPMENT, NET
Leasing equipment, net is summarized as follows:
September 30, 2015
Equipment
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Jefferson Terminal
Total
Leasing equipment:
$
426,142

$
182,355

$
44,327

$
652,824

Less: Accumulated depreciation
(27,332
)
(8,204
)
(1,269
)
(36,805
)
Leasing equipment, net
$
398,810

$
174,151

$
43,058

$
616,019

December 31, 2014
Equipment
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Jefferson Terminal
Total
Leasing equipment:
$
298,204

$
182,355

$
44,326

$
524,885

Less: Accumulated depreciation
(11,331
)
(3,737
)
(438
)
(15,506
)
Leasing equipment, net
$
286,873

$
178,618

$
43,888

$
509,379

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , the Company acquired seventeen commercial jet engines and four aircraft, and also sold three commercial jet engines. Depreciation expense for leasing equipment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $7,888 and $22,072 respectively. Depreciation expense for leasing equipment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $3,136 and $7,633 , respectively.
5.
FINANCE LEASES, NET
Finance leases, net are summarized as follows:
September 30, 2015
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Total
Finance leases
$
20,543

$
86,701

$
107,244

Unearned revenue
(10,329
)
(11,514
)
(21,843
)
Finance leases, net
$
10,214

$
75,187

$
85,401

December 31, 2014
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Total
Finance leases
$
22,045

$
109,492

$
131,537

Unearned revenue
(11,580
)
(17,144
)
(28,724
)
Finance leases, net
$
10,465

$
92,348

$
102,813

At September 30, 2015 , future minimum lease payments to be received under finance leases for the remainder of the lease terms are as follows:
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Total
2015
$
506

$
4,369

$
4,875

2016
2,013

25,680

27,693

2017
2,008

51,308

53,316

2018
2,008

5,344

7,352

2019
2,008

—

2,008

Thereafter
12,000

—

12,000

Total
$
20,543

$
86,701

$
107,244


14

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



6.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property, plant and equipment, net is summarized as follows:
September 30, 2015
Railroad
Jefferson Terminal
Total
Land and improvements
$
5,478

$
14,014

$
19,492

Construction in progress
1,770

50,188

51,958

Buildings and improvements
544

2,193

2,737

Crude oil terminal machinery and equipment
—

207,846

207,846

Track and track related assets
15,750

—

15,750

Railroad equipment
1,307

—

1,307

Railcars and locomotives
1,521

—

1,521

Computer hardware and software
104

34

138

Furniture and fixtures
10

317

327

Vehicles
390

258

648

26,874

274,850

301,724

Less: accumulated depreciation
(2,299
)
(7,899
)
(10,198
)
Spare parts
$
—

$
2,826

$
2,826

Property, plant and equipment, net
$
24,575

$
269,777

$
294,352

December 31, 2014
Railroad
Jefferson Terminal
Total
Land and improvements
$
5,484

$
9,573

$
15,057

Construction in progress
—

145,716

145,716

Buildings and improvements
436

2,139

2,575

Crude oil terminal machinery and equipment
—

50,627

50,627

Track and track related assets
12,022

—

12,022

Railroad equipment
1,268

—

1,268

Railcars and locomotives
1,293

—

1,293

Computer hardware and software
—

34

34

Furniture and fixtures
—

317

317

Vehicles
321

258

579


20,824

208,664

229,488

Less: accumulated depreciation
(962
)
(1,145
)
(2,107
)
Property, plant and equipment, net
$
19,862

$
207,519

$
227,381

During nine months ended September 30, 2015 additional property, plant and equipment of $75,315 was acquired, and is mainly related to land and improvements and crude oil terminal machinery and equipment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , disposals of railroad equipment totaled $253 . Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was $2,764 and $8,114 , for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively. Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was $ 676 and $ 796 , for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. Spare parts are depreciated in conjunction with the underlying asset when placed in service.

15

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



7.
INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITY
The following table presents the ownership interest and carrying values of the Company’s investment in unconsolidated entity:
Carrying Value
Date Acquired
Ownership Percentage
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Intermodal Finance I, Ltd.
September 2012
51%
$
11,370

$
21,569

Intermodal Finance I, Ltd.
The Company owns a 51% non-controlling interest in Intermodal Finance I Ltd., a joint venture. Intermodal Finance I, Ltd owns a portfolio of multiple finance leases, representing 6 customers and comprising approximately 65,000 shipping containers as well as a portfolio of approximately 38,000 shipping containers subject to multiple operating leases to a single customer. During the three months ended September 30, 2015 , Intermodal Finance I, Ltd. recorded an impairment charge of $ 20,604 , which resulted from certain operating leases not being renewed and containers being returned at a faster pace than expected.  Additionally, due to challenging market conditions for shipping containers, a limited number of the returned containers were sold at values lower than previously estimated.  The Company's proportionate share of the impairment charge was $10,508 based on its 51% ownership percentage.
Summary financial information for Intermodal Finance I, Ltd. is as follows:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Revenue
Total revenues
$
3,935

$
5,021

$
12,429

$
15,838

Expenses
Operating expenses
296

520

722

1,242

General and administrative
241

192

614

608

Depreciation and amortization
586

471

1,785

1,808

Interest expense
930

1,434

2,788

3,930

Loss on debt extinguishment
—

119

—

119

Loss on disposal of equipment
266

—

317

—

Impairment expense
20,604

—

20,604

—

Total expenses
22,923

2,736

26,830

7,707

Gain on early termination of finance lease
—

917

—

917

Other income
96

—

130

—

Total other income
96

917

130

917

Net income (loss)
(18,892
)
3,202

(14,271
)
9,048




—

Comprehensive income (loss)
$
(18,892
)
$
3,202

$
(14,271
)
$
9,048

Company's equity in (loss) earnings
$
(9,584
)
$
1,700

$
(7,118
)
$
4,831


16

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



September 30,
December 31,
2015
2014
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
4,062

$
5,214

Restricted cash
1,820

2,320

Accounts receivable
1,016

1,051

Other receivables
7

—

Leasing assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $5,949 and $4,449, respectively
51,165

74,045

Finance leases, net
41,534

62,393

Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization of $794 and $602, respectively
1,160

1,524

Other assets
12

8

Total assets
$
100,776

$
146,555

Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
180

157

Syndication liabilities
3,201

5,152

Debt
93,077

120,303

Other liabilities
97

383

Total liabilities
96,555

125,995

Members’ Equity
Members’ equity
4,221

20,560

Total members’ equity
4,221

20,560

Total liabilities and members’ equity
$
100,776

$
146,555

Company’s investment in and advances to unconsolidated entity
$
11,370

$
21,569


17

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



8.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES, NET
The Company’s intangible assets and liabilities, net are summarized as follows:
September 30, 2015
Aviation Leasing
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Total
Intangible assets:
Acquired favorable lease intangibles
$
22,882

$
—

$
—

$
22,882

Accumulated amortization
(8,075
)
—

—

(8,075
)
Total acquired favorable lease intangibles, net
14,807

—

—

14,807

Customer relationships
—

35,513

225

35,738

Accumulated amortization
—

(3,833
)
(64
)
(3,897
)
Total acquired customer relationships, net
—

31,680

161

31,841

Total intangible assets, net
$
14,807

$
31,680

$
161

$
46,648

Intangible liabilities:
Acquired unfavorable lease intangibles
$
396

$
—

$
—

$
396

Accumulated amortization
(105
)
—

—

(105
)
Total acquired unfavorable lease intangibles, net
$
291

$
—

$
—

$
291

December 31, 2014
Aviation Leasing
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Total
Intangible assets:
Acquired favorable lease intangibles
$
20,435

$
—

$
—

$
20,435

Accumulated amortization
(2,796
)
—

—

(2,796
)
Total acquired favorable lease intangibles, net
17,639

—

—

17,639

Customer relationships
—

35,513

225

35,738

Accumulated amortization
—

(1,180
)
(28
)
(1,208
)
Total acquired customer relationships, net
—

34,333

197

34,530

Total intangible assets, net
$
17,639

$
34,333

$
197

$
52,169

Intangible liabilities:
Acquired unfavorable lease intangibles
$
261

$
—

$
—

$
261

Accumulated amortization
(24
)
—

—

(24
)
Total acquired unfavorable lease intangibles, net
$
237

$
—

$
—

$
237


18

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)




Intangible liabilities relate to unfavorable lease intangibles and are included as a component of other liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amortization recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Classification in Consolidated Statements of Operations
2015
2014
2015
2014
Lease intangibles
$
1,405

$
796

$
5,198

$
1,652

Equipment leasing revenues
Customer relationships
896

306

2,689

312

Depreciation and amortization
Total
$
2,301

$
1,102

$
7,887

$
1,964

As of September 30, 2015 , estimated net annual amortization of intangibles is as follows:
September 30, 2015
2015
$
2,548

2016
9,533

2017
6,951

2018
6,145

2019
4,571

Thereafter
16,609

Total
$
46,357

9.
DEBT
Debt is summarized as follows:
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Loans payable
Container Loan #1
$
36,581

$
42,040

Container Loan #2
11,702

19,115

FTAI Pride Credit Agreement
68,750

73,438

CMQR Credit Agreement
9,284

9,416

Jefferson Terminal Credit Agreement
99,000

99,750

Total loans payable
225,317

243,759

Bonds payable
Series 2010 Bonds
—

298,000

Series 2012 Bonds (including unamortized premium of $1,763 and $1,791 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)
47,273

48,521

Total bonds payable
47,273

346,521

Note payable to non-controlling interest
Note payable to non-controlling interest
2,352

2,587

Total note payable to non-controlling interest
2,352

2,587

Total debt
$
274,942

$
592,867

Total debt due within one year
$
23,947

$
23,915


As of December 31, 2014, Series 2010 Bonds purchased by the Company were deemed to be owned by the Company,
and were classified as assets, Tendered bonds, in the Consolidated Balance Sheet with an equal corresponding amount

19

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



as Debt. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Jefferson County Industrial Development Corporation, the Company, and Amegy Bank as the related trustee, agreed to cancel the Series 2010 Bonds. Accordingly, the Series 2010 Bonds are no longer reported within Tendered Bonds or Debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2015.
10.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements and disclosures require the use of valuation techniques to measure fair value that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized as follows:
• Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
•
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market corroborated inputs.
•
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which require the Company to develop its own assumptions about how market participants price the asset or liability.
The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
•
Market approach—Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
•
Income approach—Uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market expectations about those future amounts.
•
Cost approach—Based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , by level within the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement.
Fair Value as of
Fair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Hierarchy as of
September 30, 2015
September 30, 2015
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Valuation Technique
Assets:





Cash and cash equivalents
$
448,299

$
448,299

$
—

$
—

Market
Restricted cash
16,169

16,169

—

—

Market
Derivative assets
4

—

4

—

Income
Total assets at fair value
$
464,472

$
464,468

$
4

$
—


Liabilities at fair value
$
16

$
—

$
16

$
—

Income
Fair Value as of
Fair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Hierarchy as of
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2014
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Valuation Technique
Assets:





Cash and cash equivalents
$
22,125

$
22,125

$
—

$
—

Market
Restricted cash
21,084

21,084

—

—

Market
Derivative assets
232

—

232

—

Income
Total assets at fair value
$
43,441

$
43,209

$
232

$
—


At December 31, 2014 , the Company had no liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

20

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



The Company’s cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash consist largely of demand deposit accounts with initial maturities of 90 days or less that are considered to be highly liquid and easily tradable. These instruments are valued using inputs observable in active markets for identical instruments and are therefore classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s derivatives are valued using discounted cash flow models with observable market inputs (i.e., cash rates, futures rates, swap rates and contractual cash flows) that can be verified and do not involve significant judgments and are therefore classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Except as discussed below, the Company’s financial instruments other than cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and derivatives consist principally of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, bonds payable, security deposits, maintenance deposits and management fees payable, whose fair value approximates their carrying value based on an evaluation of pricing data, vendor quotes, and historical trading activity or due to their short maturity profiles.
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , the Company’s notes receivable, included as a component of other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet, consisted of a $3,725 loan bearing interest at 12.0% made to the Company’s joint venture partner in MT 6015 (Note 2) which is collateralized by other property owned by the joint venture partner. At September 30, 2015 , the Company's notes receivable also included a $10,776 loan bearing interest at 10% related to a terminal site under development, collateralized by property at that site. The fair values of these notes receivable approximate carrying value due to both bearing a market rate of interest for similar types of loans and is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
The fair values of Container Loan #1 and Container Loan #2, reported in Debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , were approximately $36,900 and $42,515 , respectively, and $11,726 and $19,129 , respectively, based upon current market interest rates for similar types of loans. The fair value of Series 2012 bonds, reported in Debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, was approximately $48,447 at September 30, 2015 and approximated carrying value at December 31, 2014 , based upon market prices for similar municipal securities. The fair values of all other items reported as Debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate their carrying values due to their bearing market rates of interest, and are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
The Company measures the fair value of certain assets and liabilities on a non-recurring basis when GAAP requires the application of fair value, including events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying amounts of assets may not be recoverable. Assets subject to these measurements include goodwill, intangible assets, property, plant and equipment and leasing equipment. The Company records such assets at fair value when it is determined the carrying value may not be recoverable. Fair value measurements for assets subject to impairment tests are based on an income approach which uses Level 3 inputs, which include the Company’s assumptions as to future cash flows from operation of the underlying businesses and the leasing and eventual sale of assets.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , no impairment charges were recognized related to the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. See Note 7 for impairment recorded by the Company's investment in unconsolidated entity during the three months ended September 30, 2015 .

21

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



11.
REVENUES
Components of revenue are as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Revenues
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Total
Equipment leasing revenues






Lease income
$
10,664

$
5,816

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
16,480

Maintenance revenue
5,510

—

—

—

—

5,510

Finance lease income
—

418

1,726

—

—

2,144

Other revenue
—

201

25

—

—

226

Total equipment leasing revenues
$
16,174

$
6,435

$
1,751

$
—

$
—

$
24,360

Infrastructure revenues






Lease income
—

—

—

1,030

—

1,030

Rail revenues
—

—

—

—

6,641

6,641

Terminal services revenues
—

—

—

3,202

—

3,202

Total infrastructure revenues
$
—

$
—

$
—

$
4,232

$
6,641

$
10,873

Total revenues
$
16,174

$
6,435

$
1,751

$
4,232

$
6,641

$
35,233

Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Revenues
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Total
Equipment leasing revenues
Lease income
$
4,031

$
2,570

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
6,601

Maintenance revenue
1,425

—

—

—

—

1,425

Finance lease income
—

423

2,064

—

—

2,487

Other revenue
3

30

25

—

—

58

Total equipment leasing revenues
$
5,459

$
3,023

$
2,089

$
—

$
—

$
10,571

Infrastructure revenues
Lease income
—

—

—

439

—

439

Rail revenues
—

—

—

—

3,970

3,970

Terminal services revenues
—

—

—

1,100

—

1,100

Total infrastructure revenues
$
—

$
—

$
—

$
1,539

$
3,970

$
5,509

Total revenues
$
5,459

$
3,023

$
2,089

$
1,539

$
3,970

$
16,080


22

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Equipment Leasing

Infrastructure


Revenues
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Total
Equipment leasing revenues
Lease income
$
30,211

$
18,419

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
48,630

Maintenance revenue
12,895

—

—

—

—

12,895

Finance lease income
—

1,247

5,496

—

—

6,743

Other revenue
1,120

568

75

—

—

1,763

Total equipment leasing revenues
$
44,226

$
20,234

$
5,571

$
—

$
—

$
70,031

Infrastructure revenues
Lease income
—

—

—

3,850

—

3,850

Rail revenues
—

—

—

—

18,488

18,488

Terminal services revenues
—

—

—

10,401

—

10,401

Total infrastructure revenues
—

—

—

$
14,251

$
18,488

$
32,739

Total revenues
$
44,226

$
20,234

$
5,571

$
14,251

$
18,488

$
102,770

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Revenues
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Total
Equipment leasing revenues
Lease income
$
10,018

$
6,281

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
16,299

Maintenance revenue
4,029

—

—

—

—

4,029

Finance lease income
—

1,288

6,294

—

—

7,582

Other revenue
3

30

75

—

—

108

Total equipment leasing revenues
$
14,050

$
7,599

$
6,369

$
—

$
—

$
28,018

Infrastructure revenues
Lease income
—

—

—

439

—

439

Rail revenues
—

—

—

—

4,954

4,954

Terminal services revenues
—

—

—

1,100

—

1,100

Total infrastructure revenues
—

—

—

$
1,539

$
4,954

$
6,493

Total revenues
$
14,050

$
7,599

$
6,369

$
1,539

$
4,954

$
34,511

Minimum future annual revenues contracted to be received under existing operating leases of equipment at September 30, 2015 are as follows:
September 30, 2015
2015
$
22,422

2016
55,351

2017
36,400

2018
23,813

2019
9,857

Thereafter
3,218

$
151,061

12.
EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION
In 2015, subsequent to the IPO, the Company established a Nonqualified Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan (“Incentive Plan”) which provides for the ability to award equity compensation awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and performance awards to eligible employees, consultants, directors, and

23

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



other individuals who provide services to the Company, each as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Amounts are in thousands except share data.
As of September 30, 2015 , the Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of up to 30,000,000 shares. The Company accounts for equity-based compensation expense in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 718 Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) and is reported within Operating Expenses and General and Administrative in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Stock Options
In June 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 15,000 stock options ( 5,000 options each) to its three independent directors pursuant to the Incentive Plan with a grant date fair value of $24 which immediately vested upon grant and expire after 10 years . The fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model using the following assumptions:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Expected volatility
Due to the lack of historical data for the Company’s own stock, the Company has based its expected volatility on a representative peer group with similar business characteristics.
28%
Risk free interest rate
The risk-free rate is determined using the implied yield currently available on U.S. government bonds with a term consistent with the expected term on the date of grant.
2.4%
Expected dividend yield
The expected dividend yield is based on management’s current expected dividend rate.
6.50%
Expected term
Expected term used represents the period of time the options granted are expected to be outstanding.
5 years
Options
Weighted-Average Exercise Price (per share)
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Stock options outstanding at January 1, 2015
—




Granted
15,000

$
16.98



Exercised
—




Forfeited and cancelled
—




Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2015
15,000


9.67
$
—

Restricted Shares
The Company has granted equity based compensation to employees of a subsidiary consisting of 1.3 million restricted shares of such subsidiary’s equity instruments in exchange for services to be provided. One award for 1.25 million restricted shares vests in three tranches over three years , subject to continued employment and the achievement of three separate performance conditions based on EBITDA for that subsidiary, as defined. The award expires in August 2017. The award is equity based, with compensation expense recognized ratably over the remaining service period when it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. The grant date fair value of the award is $23,879 which was based on the fair value per share on August 27, 2014, the date of grant, and estimated using a market approach. As of September 30, 2015 , the achievement of one performance condition representing 50% of the grant value remains probable.
A second award vests over four years , subject to continued employment. The grant date fair value of the award is $800 , which is based on the fair value per share on the date of grant, estimated using a market approach.
All restricted shares were outstanding and unvested as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 . The awards have an assumed forfeiture rate of zero .
Common Units

24

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



The Company has granted equity based compensation to employees of a subsidiary consisting of 1.4 million common units of such subsidiary’s equity instruments with an aggregate grant date fair value of $1,752 in exchange for services to be provided. The awards have varying terms, ranging between 16 and 36 months , and vest subject to continued employment through each respective vesting date. The awards are equity based, with compensation expense recognized ratably over the vesting periods. The awards have an assumed forfeiture rate of zero .
The fair value of the awards are based on the fair value of the operating subsidiary on each date of grant, which was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis which requires the application of discount factors and terminal multiples to projected cash flows. Discount factors and terminal multiples were based on market based inputs and transactions, as available at the measurement dates.
The Company's Statements of Operations includes the following expense related to its stock-based compensation arrangements:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Remaining Expense To Be Recognized, If All Vesting Conditions Are Met
Stock Options
$
—

$
24

$
—

Restricted Shares
903

2,675

20,866

Common Units
191

995

744

Total
$
1,094

$
3,694

$
21,610

During both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to restricted shares of $ 284 .
13.
INCOME TAXES

The current and deferred components of the income tax expense included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations are as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Current:
Federal
$
50

$
210

$
99

$
558

State and local
8

(15
)
59

—

Foreign
80

—

319

—

Total current provision
138

195

477

558

Deferred:




Federal
(97
)
(29
)
(53
)
156

State and local
4

(10
)
5

—

Foreign
105

—

217

—

Total deferred provision (benefit)
12

(39
)
169

156

Total provision for income taxes
$
150

$
156

$
646

$
714

The Company is taxed as a flow-through entity for U.S. income tax purposes and its taxable income or loss generated is the responsibility of its owners. Taxable income or loss generated by the Company’s corporate subsidiaries is subject to U.S. federal, state and foreign corporate income tax in locations where they conduct business.

The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal tax rate of 35% primarily due to a significant portion of its income that is not subject to U.S. corporate tax rates or that is deemed to be foreign sourced and is either not taxable or taxable at effectively lower tax rates.

As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , the Company had not established a liability for uncertain tax positions as no such positions existed. In general, the Company’s tax returns and the tax returns of its corporate

25

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal, state and foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities. Generally, the Company is not subject to examination by taxing authorities for tax years prior to 2011. The Company does not believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change within 12 months of the reporting date.
14.
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT AND AFFILIATE TRANSACTIONS
The Manager is paid annual fees in exchange for advising the Company on various aspects of its business, formulating its investment strategies, arranging for the acquisition and disposition of assets, arranging for financing, monitoring performance, and managing its day-to-day operations, inclusive of all costs incidental thereto. In addition, the Manager may be reimbursed for various expenses incurred by the Manager on the Company’s behalf, including the costs of legal, accounting and other administrative activities. In May 2015, in connection with the IPO, the Company entered into a new management agreement with the Manager, (the “Management Agreement”) which replaced its then-existing management agreement as a private fund. The terms of each arrangement, pre-IPO and post-IPO, are described below.
Pre-IPO Management Agreement
The pre-IPO management fee was calculated at an annual rate of 1.25% for any Onshore Fund or Offshore Fund investor (collectively, the “Fund Investors”) with a capital commitment of at least $100 million and 1.50% for any capital commitment of less than $100 million, payable semi-annually in arrears. Commencing with the date of the initial closing of the Onshore Fund and the Offshore Fund and continuing through the third anniversary of their final closing (the “Fund Commitment Period”), this percentage was applied to the weighted average of all capital called, reduced for any return of capital resulting from the partial or complete disposition of any Portfolio Investment, as defined. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , pre-IPO management fees were $3,873 . During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , pre-IPO management fees were $1,698 and $3,535 , respectively.
In addition, affiliates of the Manager were entitled to receive an amount not to exceed $1 million per annum to cover legal, compliance, operational, tax, accounting, insurance, transfer agent and informational technology services (“Specified General and Administrative Expenses”) performed by employees of such affiliates on behalf of the Company or the Onshore Fund and the Offshore Fund. No expenses were reimbursed to the Manager or its affiliates for any period prior to the IPO.
Prior to the IPO, the Master GP was entitled to an incentive return (the “Incentive Return”) generally equal to 10% of the Partnership’s profits (before certain taxes), as defined, subject to: i) an 8% cumulative preferred return payable to the Onshore Fund and Offshore Fund investors and ii) a clawback provision which requires amounts previously distributed as Incentive Return to be returned to the Company for the benefit of the Onshore Fund and Offshore Fund investors (after adjusting for tax in accordance with the partnership agreement) if, upon the termination of the Company, the amounts ultimately distributed to the Master GP exceed its allocable amount.

The Incentive Return was distributable to the Master GP from Distributable Proceeds of the Partnership (as defined) as they were distributed. Accordingly, an Incentive Return would have been paid to the Master GP in connection with a particular investment if and when such investment generated proceeds in excess of the capital called with respect to such investment, plus an 8% cumulative preferred return on such investment and on all previously liquidated investments. If, upon the termination of the Partnership, the aggregate amount paid to the Master GP as Incentive Return exceeded the amount actually due after taking into account the aggregate return to the Onshore Fund and the Offshore Fund investors, the excess was required to be returned by the Master GP (“clawed back”, after adjusting for tax in accordance with the Company agreements) to the Company for benefit of the Fund Investors.

Immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO, the Master GP contributed its rights to previously undistributed incentive return pursuant to the Partnership Agreement in exchange for limited partnership interests in each of the Onshore Fund and Offshore Fund equal to the amount of any such undistributed incentive returns.

Certain employees of an affiliate of the Manager are or may become entitled to receive profit sharing arrangements from the Master GP, pursuant to which they receive a portion of the Master GP’s Incentive Return. The Company is not required to reimburse the Master GP for such amounts. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , the Master GP did not incur any amounts payable to these employees under such profit sharing arrangements attributable to the operations of the Company.

Post-IPO Management Agreement

26

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)




The Manager is entitled to a management fee, incentive allocations (comprised of income incentive allocation and capital gains incentive allocation, defined below) and reimbursement of certain expenses. The post-IPO management fee is determined by taking the average value of total equity (excluding non-controlling interests) determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP at the end of the two most recently completed months multiplied by an annual rate of 1.50% , and is payable monthly in arrears in cash. The total post-IPO management fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were $4,606 and $6,632 , respectively.

The income incentive allocation is calculated and distributable quarterly in arrears based on the pre-incentive allocation net income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter (the “Income Incentive Allocation”). For this purpose, pre-incentive allocation net income means, with respect to a calendar quarter, net income attributable to shareholders during such quarter calculated in accordance with GAAP excluding the Company’s pro rata share of (1) realized or unrealized gains and losses, and (2) certain non-cash or one-time items, and (3) any other adjustments as may be approved by the Company’s independent directors. Pre-incentive allocation net income does not include any Income Incentive Allocation or Capital Gains Incentive Allocation (described below) paid to the Master GP during the relevant quarter.

A subsidiary of the Company allocates and distributes to the Master GP an Income Incentive Allocation with respect to its pre-incentive allocation net income in each calendar quarter as follows: (1) no Income Incentive Allocation in any calendar quarter in which pre-incentive allocation net income, expressed as a rate of return on the average value of the Company’s net equity capital (excluding non-controlling interests) at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters, does not exceed 2.0% for such quarter ( 8.0% annualized); (2) 100% of pre-incentive allocation net income with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive allocation net income, if any, that is equal to or exceeds 2.00% but does not exceed 2.2223% for such quarter; and (3) 10.0% of the amount of pre-incentive allocation net income, if any, that exceeds 2.2223% for such quarter. These calculations will be prorated for any period of less than three months. No Income Incentive Allocation was due to the Master GP for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 .

Capital Gains Incentive Allocation is calculated and distributable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year and is equal to 10% of the Company’s pro rata share of cumulative realized gains from the date of the IPO through the end of the applicable calendar year, net of the Company’s pro rata share of cumulative realized or unrealized losses, the cumulative non-cash portion of equity-based compensation expenses and all realized gains upon which prior performance-based Capital Gains Incentive Allocation payments were made to the Master GP. No Capital Gains Incentive Allocation was due to the Master GP for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 .

The Company will pay all of its operating expenses, except those specifically required to be borne by the Manager under the Management Agreement. The expenses required to be paid by the Company include, but are not limited to, issuance and transaction costs incident to the acquisition, disposition and financing of the company’s assets, legal and auditing fees and expenses, the compensation and expenses of the Company’s independent directors, the costs associated with the establishment and maintenance of any credit facilities and other indebtedness of the Company (including commitment fees, legal fees, closing costs, etc.), expenses associated with other securities offerings of the Company, costs and expenses incurred in contracting with third parties (including affiliates of the Manager), the costs of printing and mailing proxies and reports to the Company’s shareholders, costs incurred by the Manager or its affiliates for travel on the Company’s behalf, costs associated with any computer software or hardware that is used for the Company, costs to obtain liability insurance to indemnify the Company’s directors and officers and the compensation and expenses of the Company’s transfer agent.

The Company will pay or reimburse the Manager and its affiliates for performing certain legal, accounting, due diligence tasks and other services that outside professionals or outside consultants otherwise would perform, provided that such costs and reimbursements are no greater than those which would be paid to outside professionals or consultants. The Manager is responsible for all of its other costs incident to the performance of its duties under the Management Agreement, including compensation of the Manager’s employees, rent for facilities and other “overhead” expenses; the Company will not reimburse the Manager for these expenses. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , expense reimbursement of $1,677 and $2,319 was recorded in General and Administrative, respectively, and $882 and $1,103 was recorded in Acquisition and Transaction expenses, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


27

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



If the Company terminates the Management Agreement, it will generally be required to pay the Manager a termination fee. The termination fee is equal to the amount of the management fee during the 12 months immediately preceding the date of the termination. In addition, an Incentive Allocation Fair Value Amount will be distributable to the Master GP if the Master GP is removed due to the termination of the Management Agreement in certain specified circumstances. The Incentive Allocation Fair Value Amount is an amount equal to the Income Incentive Allocation and the Capital Gains Incentive Allocation that would be paid to the Master GP if the Company’s assets were sold for cash at their then current fair market value (as determined by an appraisal, taking into account, among other things, the expected future value of the underlying investments).

Upon the successful completion of a post-IPO offering of the Company’s common shares or other equity securities (including securities issued as consideration in an acquisition), the Company will grant the Manager options to purchase common shares in an amount equal to 10% of the number of common shares being sold in the offering (or if the issuance relates to equity securities other than the Company’s common shares, options to purchase a number of common shares equal to 10% of the gross capital raised in the equity issuance divided by the fair market value of a common share as of the date of issuance), with an exercise price equal to the offering price per share paid by the public or other ultimate purchaser or attributed to such securities in connection with an acquisition (or the fair market value of a common share as of the date of the equity issuance if it relates to equity securities other than our common shares). Any ultimate purchaser of common shares for which such options are granted may be an affiliate of Fortress.
As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , amounts receivable from the Manager or its affiliates of $0 and $335 , respectively, are included within other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , amounts due to the Manager or its affiliates of $976 and $160 , respectively, excluding accrued management fees, are included within other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , amounts due to the Manager or its affiliates of $1,497 and $3,626 , respectively, related to accrued management fees, are included within accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Other Affiliate Transactions
As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , a private equity fund sponsored by Fortress owns an approximately 20% interest in Jefferson Terminal which has been accounted for as a component of non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The carrying amount of this non-controlling interest at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $71,519 and $54,273 . For the three and nine months ending September 30, 2015 , the amount of this non-controlling interest share of net loss was $(2,034) and $(5,591) . For both the three and nine months ending September 30, 2014 , the amount of this non-controlling interest share of net loss was $(1,710) .
A non-controlling interest holder of Jefferson Terminal provides construction services for Jefferson Terminal. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , accounts payable due to this vendor was $4,093 and $14,025 , respectively.
15.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company’s reportable segments represent strategic business units comprised of investments in different types of transportation and infrastructure assets. The Company has five reportable segments which operate in the Equipment Leasing and Infrastructure businesses across several market sectors. The Company’s reportable segments are Aviation Leasing, Offshore Energy, Shipping Containers, Jefferson Terminal and Railroad. Aviation Leasing consists of aircraft and aircraft engines held for lease and are typically held long-term. Offshore Energy consists of vessels and equipment that support offshore oil and gas drilling and production which are typically subject to long-term operating leases. Shipping Containers consist of investments in shipping containers and related equipment subject to operating leases and finance leases and also includes an investment in an unconsolidated entity engaged in the acquisition and leasing of shipping containers (on both an operating lease and finance lease basis). Jefferson Terminal consists of a multi-modal crude oil and refined products terminal and other related assets. Railroad consists of our CMQR railroad operations.
With the CMQR and Jefferson Terminal acquisitions during 2014, the Company created two new reporting segments, Jefferson Terminal and Railroad. The Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) also implemented Adjusted Net Income as the key performance measure during the same period. This segment structure and performance measure reflects the current management of the businesses and provides the CODM with the information necessary to assess operational performance as well as make resource and allocation decisions. These changes have been reflected within

28

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



the following tables, and the accompanying 2014 tables have been conformed to the current presentation described above.
Corporate consists primarily of unallocated Company level general and administrative expenses and management fees. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies; however financial information presented by segment include the impact of intercompany eliminations. The Company evaluates investment performance for each reportable segment primarily based on Net Income attributable to shareholders and Adjusted Net Income.
Adjusted Net Income is defined as net income attributable to shareholders, adjusted (a) to exclude the impact of provision for income taxes, equity-based compensation expense, acquisition and transaction expenses, losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations, changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments, asset impairment charges, incentive allocations, and equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities; (b) to include the impact of cash income tax payments, the Company’s pro-rata share of the Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities (collectively “Adjusted Net Income”), and (c) to exclude the impact of the non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Income.
The Company believes that net income attributable to shareholders as defined by GAAP is the most appropriate earnings measurement with which to reconcile Adjusted Net Income. Adjusted Net Income should not be considered as an alternative to Net Income attributable to shareholders as determined in accordance with GAAP.

29

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



The following tables set forth certain information for each reportable segment of the Company:
I. For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Revenues
Equipment leasing revenues
$
16,174

$
6,435

$
1,751

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
24,360

Infrastructure revenues
—

—

—

4,232

6,641

—

10,873

Total revenues
16,174

6,435

1,751

4,232

6,641

—

35,233

Expenses
Operating expenses
1,208

724

128

8,599

7,220

—

17,879

General and administrative
—

—

—

—

—

2,568

2,568

Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

—

—

2,206

2,206

Management fees and incentive allocation to affiliate
—

—

—

—

—

4,606

4,606

Depreciation and amortization
6,122

1,489

—

3,469

468

—

11,548

Interest expense
—

946

591

2,988

143

—

4,668

Total expenses
7,330

3,159

719

15,056

7,831

9,380

43,475

Other income (expense)
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

(9,584
)
—

—

—

(9,584
)
Gain on sale of equipment, net
1,674

—

—

—

72

—

1,746

Interest income
3

115

—

41

—

—

159

Other income (expense), net
—

—

(5
)
20

—

—

15

Total other income (expense)
1,677

115

(9,589
)
61

72

—

(7,664
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
10,521

3,391

(8,557
)
(10,763
)
(1,118
)
(9,380
)
(15,906
)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
308

—

(164
)
4

—

2

150

Net income (loss)
10,213

3,391

(8,393
)
(10,767
)
(1,118
)
(9,382
)
(16,056
)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries
—

196

—

(4,454
)
(54
)
(6
)
(4,318
)
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders
$
10,213

$
3,195

$
(8,393
)
$
(6,313
)
$
(1,064
)
$
(9,376
)
$
(11,738
)

30

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income to Net Income attributable to shareholders:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
$
10,521

$
3,195

$
1,956

$
(5,762
)
$
(884
)
$
(7,168
)
$
1,858

Add: Non-controlling share of adjustments to Adjusted Net Income
370

Add: Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated entities
(9,584
)
Add: Cash payments for income taxes
(3
)
Less: Incentive allocations
—

Less: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from investments in unconsolidated entities
(924
)
Less: Asset impairment charges
—

Less: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
(5
)
Less: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

Less: Acquisition and transaction expenses
(2,206
)
Less: Equity-based compensation expense
(1,094
)
Less: Provision for income taxes
(150
)
Net Loss attributable to shareholders
$
(11,738
)
Summary information with respect to the Company’s geographic sources of revenue is as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Revenues
Africa
$
2,668

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
2,668

Asia
6,611

1,887

1,316

—

—

—

9,814

Europe
5,785

4,130

—

—

—

—

9,915

North America
821

418

435

4,232

6,641

—

12,547

South America
289

—

—

—

—

—

289

Total revenues
$
16,174

$
6,435

$
1,751

$
4,232

$
6,641

$
—

$
35,233



31

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



II. For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure


Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Revenues
Equipment leasing revenues
$
44,226

$
20,234

$
5,571

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
70,031

Infrastructure revenues
—

—

—

14,251

18,488

—

32,739

Total revenues
44,226

20,234

5,571

14,251

18,488

—

102,770

Expenses
Operating expenses
1,923

1,685

298

24,773

21,519

—

50,198

General and administrative
—

—

—

—

—

4,905

4,905

Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

—

—

4,172

4,172

Management fees and incentive allocation to affiliate
—

—

—

—

—

10,505

10,505

Depreciation and amortization
16,774

4,467

—

10,238

1,396

—

32,875

Interest expense
—

2,854

1,858

9,094

434

—

14,240

Total expenses
18,697

9,006

2,156

44,105

23,349

19,582

116,895

Other income (expense)
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

(7,118
)
—

—

—

(7,118
)
Gain on sale of equipment, net
1,958

—

—

—

79

—

2,037

Interest income
11

368

—

83

—

—

462

Other income (expense), net
—

—

(14
)
20

—

—

6

Total other income (expense)
1,969

368

(7,132
)
103

79

—

(4,613
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
27,498

11,596

(3,717
)
(29,751
)
(4,782
)
(19,582
)
(18,738
)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
720

—

(129
)
53

—

2

646

Net income (loss)
26,778

11,596

(3,588
)
(29,804
)
(4,782
)
(19,584
)
(19,384
)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries
—

566

—

(12,653
)
(166
)
(4
)
(12,257
)
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders
$
26,778

$
11,030

$
(3,588
)
$
(17,151
)
$
(4,616
)
$
(19,580
)
$
(7,127
)

32

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income to Net Income attributable to shareholders:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure


Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
$
27,271

$
11,030

$
6,805

$
(15,718
)
$
(3,656
)
$
(15,382
)
$
10,350

Add: Non-controlling share of adjustments to Adjusted Net Income
1,050

Add: Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated entities
(7,118
)
Add: Cash payments for income taxes
507

Less: Incentive allocations
—

Less: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from investments in unconsolidated entities
(3,390
)
Less: Asset impairment charges
—

Less: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
(14
)
Less: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

Less: Acquisition and transaction expenses
(4,172
)
Less: Equity-based compensation expense
(3,694
)
Less: Provision for income taxes
(646
)
Net Loss attributable to shareholders
$
(7,127
)
Summary information with respect to the Company’s geographic sources of revenue is as follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure


Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Revenues







Africa
$
8,466

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
8,466

Asia
18,367

5,597

4,043

—

—

—

28,007

Europe
14,931

13,378

—

—

—

—

28,309

North America
1,914

1,259

1,528

14,251

18,488

—

37,440

South America
548

—

—

—

—

—

548

Total revenues
$
44,226

$
20,234

$
5,571

$
14,251

$
18,488

$
—

$
102,770



33

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



II. For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Revenues














Equipment leasing revenues
$
5,459

$
3,023

$
2,089

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
10,571

Infrastructure revenues
—

—

—

1,539

3,970

—

5,509

Total revenues
5,459

3,023

2,089

1,539

3,970

—

16,080








Expenses







Operating expenses
600

150

60

2,479

6,071

—

9,360

General and administrative
—

—

—

—

—

401

401

Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

284

420

104

808

Management fees and incentive allocation to affiliate
—

—

—

—

—

1,698

1,698

Depreciation and amortization
2,443

561

—

704

410

—

4,118

Interest expense
—

181

699

456

12

—

1,348

Total expenses
3,043

892

759

3,923

6,913

2,203

17,733








Other income (expense)







Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

1,700

—

—

—

1,700

Gain on sale of equipment, net
1,849

—

—

—

—

—

1,849

Interest income
6

46

—

—

—

—

52

Other income, net
—

—

1

153

—

—

154

Total other income
1,855

46

1,701

153

—

—

3,755

Income (loss) before income taxes
4,271

2,177

3,031

(2,231
)
(2,943
)
(2,203
)
2,102

Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(31
)
—

(7
)
194

—

—

156

Net income (loss)
4,302

2,177

3,038

(2,425
)
(2,943
)
(2,203
)
1,946

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries
—

179

—

(2,264
)
—

—

(2,085
)
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders
$
4,302

$
1,998

$
3,038

$
(161
)
$
(2,943
)
$
(2,203
)
$
4,031


34

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income to Net Income attributable to shareholders:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
$
4,271

$
1,998

$
3,092

$
368

$
(2,523
)
$
(2,099
)
$
5,107

Add: Non-controlling share of adjustments to Adjusted Net Income
233

Add: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
1,700

Add: Cash payments for income taxes
—

Less: Incentive allocations
—

Less: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from investments in unconsolidated entities
(1,762
)
Less: Asset impairment charges
—

Less: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
1

Less: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

Less: Acquisition and transaction expenses
(808
)
Less: Equity-based compensation expense
(284
)
Less: Provision for income taxes
(156
)
Net Income attributable to shareholders
$
4,031

Summary information with respect to the Company’s geographic sources of revenue is as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Revenues
Africa
$
2,517

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
2,517

Asia
367

1,886

1,498

—

—

—

3,751

Europe
2,575

714

—

—

—

—

3,289

North America
—

423

591

1,539

3,970

—

6,523

South America
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total revenues
$
5,459

$
3,023

$
2,089

$
1,539

$
3,970

$
—

$
16,080



35

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



III. For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure


Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Revenues














Equipment leasing revenues
$
14,050

$
7,599

$
6,369

$
—

$
—



$
28,018

Infrastructure revenues
—

—

—

1,539

4,954



6,493

Total revenues
14,050

7,599

6,369

1,539

4,954

—

34,511








Expenses







Operating expenses
1,453

396

179

2,530

8,147

—

12,705

General and administrative
—

—

—

—

—

1,349

1,349

Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

5,414

5,628

239

11,281

Management fees and incentive allocation to affiliate
—

—

—

—

—

3,535

3,535

Depreciation and amortization
6,146

1,310

—

749

536

—

8,741

Interest expense
—

252

2,155

456

12

45

2,920

Total expenses
7,599

1,958

2,334

9,149

14,323

5,168

40,531








Other income (expense)







Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

4,831

—

—

—

4,831

Gain on sale of equipment, net
4,064

—

—

—

—

—

4,064

Interest income
20

46

—

—

—

—

66

Other income (expense), net
—

—

(19
)
153

—

—

134

Total other income
4,084

46

4,812

153

—

—

9,095

Income (loss) before income taxes
10,535

5,687

8,847

(7,457
)
(9,369
)
(5,168
)
3,075

Provision for income taxes
307

—

111

296

—

—

714

Net income (loss)
10,228

5,687

8,736

(7,753
)
(9,369
)
(5,168
)
2,361

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries
—

520

—

(2,264
)
—

—

(1,744
)
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders
$
10,228

$
5,167

$
8,736

$
(5,489
)
$
(9,369
)
$
(5,168
)
$
4,105


36

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income to Net Income attributable to shareholders:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
$
10,535

$
5,167

$
8,928

$
272

$
(3,741
)
$
(4,929
)
$
16,232

Add: Non-controlling share of adjustments to Adjusted Net Income
233

Add: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
4,831

Add: Cash payments for income taxes
—

Less: Incentive allocations
—

Less: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from investments in unconsolidated entities
(4,893
)
Less: Asset impairment charges
—

Less: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
(19
)
Less: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

Less: Acquisition and transaction expenses
(11,281
)
Less: Equity-based compensation expense
(284
)
Less: Provision for income taxes
(714
)
Net Income attributable to shareholders
$
4,105

Summary information with respect to the Company’s geographic sources of revenue is as follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure


Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Revenues







Africa
$
4,828

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
4,828

Asia
1,544

5,597

4,572

—

—

—

11,713

Europe
6,156

714

—

—

—

—

6,870

North America
1,522

1,288

1,797

1,539

4,954

—

11,100

South America
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total revenues
$
14,050

$
7,599

$
6,369

$
1,539

$
4,954

$
—

$
34,511



37

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



IV. Balance Sheet and location of long-lived assets
The following tables sets forth summarized balance sheet information and the geographic location of property, plant and equipment and leasing equipment, net as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 :

September 30, 2015

Equipment Leasing

Infrastructure





Aviation Leasing

Offshore Energy

Shipping Containers

Jefferson Terminal

Railroad

Corporate

Total
Total assets
$
425,072

$
208,608

$
89,483

$
487,655

$
34,799

$
436,519

$
1,682,136

Debt
—

71,102

48,283

146,273

9,284

—

274,942

Total liabilities
48,062

74,659

48,427

161,537

21,728

6,913

361,326

Non-controlling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries
—

7,582

—

115,319

1,457

598

124,956

Total equity
377,010

133,949

41,056

326,118

13,071

429,606

1,320,810

Total liabilities and equity
$
425,072

$
208,608

$
89,483

$
487,655

$
34,799

$
436,519

$
1,682,136

September 30, 2015
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Property, plant and equipment and leasing equipment, net
Africa
$
47,269

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
47,269

Asia
174,038

39,513

—

—

—

—

213,551

Europe
129,012

134,638

—

—

—

—

263,650

North America
43,914

—

—

312,835

24,575

—

381,324

South America
4,577

—

—

—

—

—

4,577

Total property, plant and equipment and leasing equipment, net
$
398,810

$
174,151

$
—

$
312,835

$
24,575

$
—

$
910,371


38

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)



December 31, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Total assets
$
308,957

$
212,699

$
117,298

$
721,266

$
30,605

$
13,915

$
1,404,740

Debt
—

76,024

61,154

446,272

9,417

—

592,867

Total liabilities
50,282

81,903

61,434

470,710

19,499

7,415

691,243

Non-controlling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries
—

7,319

—

91,118

628

—

99,065

Total equity
258,675

130,796

55,864

250,556

11,106

6,500

713,497

Total liabilities and equity
$
308,957

$
212,699

$
117,298

$
721,266

$
30,605

$
13,915

$
1,404,740

December 31, 2014
Equipment Leasing
Infrastructure
Aviation Leasing
Offshore Energy
Shipping Containers
Jefferson Terminal
Railroad
Corporate
Total
Property, plant and equipment and leasing equipment, net
Africa
$
47,945

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
47,945

Asia
119,232

40,637

—

—

—

—

159,869

Europe
105,762

137,981

—

—

—

—

243,743

North America
13,335

—

—

251,407

19,862

—

284,604

South America
599

—

—

—

—

—

599

Total property, plant and equipment and leasing equipment, net
$
286,873

$
178,618

$
—

$
251,407

$
19,862

$
—

$
736,760

16.
EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the Company by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the Company by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, plus potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities are calculated using the treasury stock method.

The Company completed an IPO on May 20, 2015 in which the Initial Shareholders, immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO, received shares in proportion to their respective ownership percentages. As a result, the Company is retrospectively presenting the shares outstanding for all prior periods presented.

The calculation of basic and diluted EPS is presented below (in thousands, except share and per share data).

Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Net Income (loss) Attributable to Shareholders
$
(11,738
)
$
4,031

$
(7,127
)
$
4,105

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding - Basic
75,718,183

53,502,873

64,114,734

53,502,873

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding - Diluted
75,718,183

53,502,873

64,114,734

53,502,873

Basic and Diluted EPS
$
(0.16
)
$
0.08

$
(0.11
)
$
0.08


39

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise noted)




For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , 1834 and 422 shares, respectively have been excluded from the calculation of Diluted EPS because the impact would be anti-dilutive.
17.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of business the Company and its subsidiaries may be involved in various claims, legal proceedings, or may enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. Within the Company’s Offshore Energy segment, a lessee has asserted that it is entitled to certain reimbursable expenses or adjustments per the terms of the related charter agreement. Although the Company believes it has strong defenses against these claims, the range of potential damages is $ 0 to $ 3,978 . No amount has been recorded for this matter in the Company's consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2015 , and the Company will continue to vigorously defend against these claims. The Company’s maximum exposure under other arrangements is unknown as no additional claims have been made. The Company believes the risk of loss in connection with such arrangements is remote.
In connection with the formation of MT6015, a consolidated VIE (Note 2), the joint venture partner is obligated to fund an additional equity contribution of $11,925 and secure a charter for the vessel, at which time the Company would be obligated to contribute additional equity of $11,925 .
Two of the Company’s subsidiaries are lessees under various operating and capital leases. As of September 30, 2015 , minimum future rental payments under these leases are as follows:
September 30, 2015
2015
$
1,680

2016
6,628

2017
5,889

2018
5,333

2019
4,892

Thereafter
48,450

$
72,872

18.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 27, 2015, Jefferson Terminal extended its lease with the Port of Beaumont from 30 to 50 years.
On November 3, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on its common stock of $0.33 per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, payable on November 30, 2015 to the holders of record on November 20, 2015.



40



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on the Company’s present beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to the Company. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words such as “outlook,” “believes,” “expects,” “potential,” “continues,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates” or the negative version of those words or other comparable words. Any forward-looking statements contained in this report are based upon our historical performance and on our current plans, estimates and expectations in light of information currently available to us. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by us, that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, financial results, financial condition, business, prospects, growth strategy and liquidity. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not limited to:
•
changes in economic conditions generally and specifically in our industry sectors, and other risks relating to the global economy;
•
reductions in cash flows received from our assets;
•
our ability to take advantage of acquisition opportunities at favorable prices;
•
a lack of liquidity surrounding our assets, which could impede our ability to vary our portfolio in an appropriate manner;
•
the relative spreads between the yield on the assets we acquire and the cost of financing;
•
adverse changes in the financing markets we access affecting our ability to finance our acquisitions;
•
customer defaults on their obligations;
•
our ability to renew existing contracts and win additional contracts with existing or potential customers;
•
the availability and cost of capital for future acquisitions;
•
concentration of a particular type of asset or in a particular sector;
•
competition within the aviation, energy, intermodal transport and rail sectors;
•
the competitive market for acquisition opportunities;
•
risks related to operating through joint ventures or partnerships or through consortium arrangements;
•
obsolescence of our assets or our ability to sell, re-lease or re-charter our assets;
•
exposure to uninsurable losses and force majeure events;
•
infrastructure operations may require substantial capital expenditures;
•
the legislative/regulatory environment and exposure to increased economic regulation;
•
exposure to the oil and gas industry’s volatile oil and gas prices;
•
difficulties in obtaining effective legal redress in jurisdictions in which we operate with less developed legal systems;
•
our ability to maintain our exemption from registration under the 1940 Act and the fact that maintaining such exemption imposes limits on our operations;
•
our ability to successfully utilize leverage in connection with our investments;
•
foreign currency risk and risk management activities;
•
effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting;
•
exposure to environmental risks, including increasing environmental legislation and the broader impacts of climate change;
•
changes in interest rates and/or credit spreads, as well as the success of any hedging strategy we may undertake in relation to such changes;

41



•
actions taken by national, state, or provincial governments, including nationalization, or the imposition of new taxes, could materially impact the financial performance or value of our assets;
•
our dependence on our Manager and its professionals and conflicts of interest in our relationship with our Manager;
•
volatility in the market price of our common shares;
•
the inability to pay dividends to our shareholders in the future; and
•
other risks described in the “Risk Factors” section.
These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this report. The forward-looking statements made in this report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement except as required by law, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from what we may have expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We caution that you should not place undue reliance on any of our forward-looking statements. Furthermore, new risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us.

42



Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help you understand Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (the “Company”). The Company’s MD&A should be read in conjunction with its unaudited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes, and with Part II, item 1A, “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
We own and acquire high quality infrastructure and related equipment that is essential for the transportation of goods and people globally. We currently invest across four market sectors: aviation, energy, intermodal transport and rail. We target assets that, on a combined basis, generate strong cash flows with potential for earnings growth and asset appreciation. We believe that there are a large number of acquisition opportunities in our markets, and that our Manager’s expertise and business and financing relationships, together with our access to capital, will allow us to take advantage of these opportunities. We are externally managed by FIG LLC (the “Manager”), an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC (“Fortress”), which has a dedicated team of professionals who collectively have acquired over $17 billion in transportation and infrastructure assets since 2002. As of September 30, 2015 , we had total consolidated assets of $1.7 billion and total equity of $ 1.3 billion .
In May 2015, the remaining capital commitments of the investors of the Onshore Fund, Offshore Fund and Master GP were called.  Through a series of transactions, (i) the Master GP contributed its rights to previously undistributed incentive allocations pursuant to the Partnership Agreement in exchange for the limited partnership interests in the Onshore Fund and the Offshore Fund equal to the amount of any such undistributed incentive allocations and (ii) 53,502,873 common shares were issued to the Onshore Fund and Offshore Fund based on their relative interests in the Company.
On May 20, 2015, we completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of 20 million common shares at a price to the public of $17.00 per share. On June 15, 2015, the underwriters exercised their overallotment option, pursuant to which we issued an additional 2.2 million shares to such underwriters at the IPO price.
The Company has used and intends to use the net proceeds from the IPO, together with other sources of capital and liquidity, for the acquisition of new assets in the sectors the Company currently invests in, as well as to opportunistically acquire assets across the entire transportation and transportation-related infrastructure and equipment market. In addition, the Company may use such net proceeds for follow-on investments in existing assets, working capital and other general purposes.
Operating Segments
Our operations consist of two primary strategic business units – Infrastructure and Equipment Leasing. Our Infrastructure Business acquires long-lived assets that provide mission-critical services or functions to transportation networks and typically have high barriers to entry. The Company targets or develops operating businesses with strong margins, stable cash flows and upside from earnings growth and asset appreciation driven by increased use and inflation. Our Equipment Leasing Business acquires assets that are designed to carry cargo or people or provide functionality to transportation infrastructure. Transportation equipment assets are typically long-lived, moveable and leased by us on either operating leases or finance leases to companies that provide transportation services. Our leases generally provide for long-term contractual cash flow with high cash-on-cash yields and may include structural protections to mitigate credit risk.
Our reportable segments are comprised of interests in different types of infrastructure and equipment leasing assets. We currently conduct our business through our corporate operating segment and the following five reportable segments: Aviation Leasing, Offshore Energy, Shipping Containers, all of which are within Equipment Leasing Business, and Jefferson Terminal and Railroad, which together comprise our Infrastructure Business. The Aviation Leasing segment consists of aircraft and aircraft engines held for lease and are typically held long-term. The Offshore Energy segment consists of vessels and equipment that support offshore oil and gas activities and are typically subject to long-term operating leases. The Shipping Containers segment consists of investments in shipping containers subject to operating leases and finance leases as well as an investment in an unconsolidated entity engaged in the acquisition and leasing of shipping containers on both an operating lease and finance lease basis. The Jefferson Terminal segment consists of a multi-modal crude and refined products terminal and other related assets which were acquired in 2014. The Railroad segment consists of our Central Maine and Quebec Railway (“CMQR”) short line railroad operations also acquired in 2014. The Corporate operating segment primarily consists of unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses and management fees.
The Company’s reportable segments are comprised of investments in different types of transportation infrastructure and equipment. Each segment requires different investment strategies. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies; however, financial information presented by segment includes the impact of intercompany eliminations.

43



Results of Operations
The Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) utilizes Adjusted Net Income as the key performance measure. This performance measure reflects the current management of our businesses and provides the CODM with the information necessary to assess operational performance as well as make resource and allocation decisions. Adjusted Net Income should not be considered as an alternative to net income attributable to shareholders as determined in accordance with GAAP. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the CODM implemented Adjusted Net Income as the key performance measure and prior periods have been conformed to the current presentation.
Adjusted Net Income is defined as net income attributable to shareholders, adjusted (a) to exclude the impact of provision for income taxes, equity-based compensation expense, acquisition and transaction expenses, losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations, changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments, asset impairment charges, incentive allocations, and equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities, (b) to include the impact of cash income tax payments, our pro-rata share of the Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities (collectively “Adjusted Net Income”), and (c) to exclude the impact of the non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Income. We evaluate investment performance for each reportable segment primarily based on Adjusted Net Income. We believe that net income attributable to shareholders as defined by GAAP is the most appropriate earnings measurement with which to reconcile Adjusted Net Income.
In addition, we view Adjusted EBITDA as a secondary measurement to Adjusted Net Income, which serves as a useful supplement to investors, analysts and management to measure operating performance of deployed assets and to compare the Company’s operating results to the operating results of our peers and between periods on a consistent basis. Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies because other entities may not calculate Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner.
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income attributable to shareholders, adjusted (a) to exclude the impact of provision for income taxes, equity-based compensation expense, acquisition and transaction expenses, losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations, changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments, asset impairment charges, incentive allocations, depreciation and amortization expense, and interest expense, (b) to include the impact of principal collections on direct finance leases (collectively, “Adjusted EBITDA”) and our pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities, and (c) to exclude the impact of equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities and the non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA.
Discussed below are our consolidated results of operations for each of our reportable segments (all amounts in U.S. dollars and expressed in thousands).
The following table presents our consolidated results of operations and reconciliation of Net Income attributable to shareholders to Adjusted Net Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Revenues
Equipment leasing revenues
Lease income
$
16,480

$
6,601

$
9,879

$
48,630

$
16,299

$
32,331

Maintenance revenue
5,510

1,425

4,085

12,895

4,029

8,866

Finance lease income
2,144

2,487

(343
)
6,743

7,582

(839
)
Other revenue
226

58

168

1,763

108

1,655

Total equipment leasing revenues
24,360

10,571

13,789

70,031

28,018

42,013

Infrastructure revenues
Lease income
1,030

439

591

3,850

439

3,411

Rail revenues
6,641

3,970

2,671

18,488

4,954

13,534

Terminal services revenues
3,202

1,100

2,102

10,401

1,100

9,301

Total infrastructure revenues
10,873

5,509

5,364

32,739

6,493

26,246

Total revenues
35,233

16,080

19,153

102,770

34,511

68,259


44


Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Expenses
Operating expenses
17,879

9,360

8,519

50,198

12,705

37,493

General and administrative
2,568

401

2,167

4,905

1,349

3,556

Acquisition and transaction expenses
2,206

808

1,398

4,172

11,281

(7,109
)
Management fees and incentive allocation to affiliate
4,606

1,698

2,908

10,505

3,535

6,970

Depreciation and amortization
11,548

4,118

7,430

32,875

8,741

24,134

Interest expense
4,668

1,348

3,320

14,240

2,920

11,320

Total expenses
43,475

17,733

25,742

116,895

40,531

76,364


Other income (expense)
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated entities
(9,584
)
1,700

(11,284
)
(7,118
)
4,831

(11,949
)
Gain on sale of equipment, net
1,746

1,849

(103
)
2,037

4,064

(2,027
)
Interest income
159

52

107

462

66

396

Other income
15

154

(139
)
6

134

(128
)
Total other income (expense)
(7,664
)
3,755

(11,419
)
(4,613
)
9,095

(13,708
)
(Loss) Income before income taxes
(15,906
)
2,102

(18,008
)
(18,738
)
3,075

(21,813
)
Provision for income taxes
150

156

(6
)
646

714

(68
)
Net (loss) income
(16,056
)
1,946

(18,002
)
(19,384
)
2,361

(21,745
)
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries
(4,318
)
(2,085
)
(2,233
)
(12,257
)
(1,744
)
(10,513
)
Net (loss) income attributable to shareholders
$
(11,738
)
$
4,031

$
(15,769
)
$
(7,127
)
$
4,105

$
(11,232
)
Add: Provision for income taxes
150

156

(6
)
646

714

(68
)
Add: Equity-based compensation expense
1,094

284

810

3,694

284

3,410

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
2,206

808

1,398

4,172

11,281

(7,109
)
Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
5

(1
)
6

14

19

(5
)
Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities (1)
924

1,762

(838
)
3,390

4,893

(1,503
)
Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Cash payments for income taxes
3

—

3

(507
)
—

(507
)
Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
9,584

(1,700
)
11,284

7,118

(4,831
)
11,949

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Income (2)
(370
)
(233
)
(137
)
(1,050
)
(233
)
(817
)
Adjusted Net Income
$
1,858

$
5,107

$
(3,249
)
$
10,350

$
16,232

$
(5,882
)
______________________________________________________________________________________
(1) Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities includes the Company’s proportionate share of the unconsolidated entities’ net income adjusted for asset impairment charges of $10,508 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 . Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities includes the Company’s proportionate share of the unconsolidated entities’ net income adjusted for loss on extinguishment of debt of $62 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 .
(2) Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Income is comprised of the following for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively: (i) equity-based compensation of $368 and $114 , (ii) provision for income tax of $1 and $119 , and (iii) cash tax payments of $1 and $0 . Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Income is comprised of the following for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively: (i) equity-based compensation of $1,099 and $114 , (ii) provision for income tax of $21 and $119 , and (iii) cash tax payments of $(70) and $0 .

45



The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Net Income attributable to shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Net (loss) income attributable to shareholders
$
(11,738
)
$
4,031

$
(15,769
)
$
(7,127
)
$
4,105

$
(11,232
)
Add: Provision for income taxes
150

156

(6
)
646

714

(68
)
Add: Equity-based compensation expense
1,094

284

810

3,694

284

3,410

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
2,206

808

1,398

4,172

11,281

(7,109
)
Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
5

(1
)
6

14

19

(5
)
Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Depreciation and amortization expense (3)
13,015

4,914

8,101

38,255

10,393

27,862

Add: Interest expense
4,668

1,348

3,320

14,240

2,920

11,320

Add: Principal collections on direct finance leases
11,270

3,363

7,907

17,412

9,028

8,384

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities (4)
5,369

17,351

(11,982
)
16,200

33,946

(17,746
)
Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
9,584

(1,700
)
11,284

7,118

(4,831
)
11,949

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA (5)
(3,004
)
(795
)
(2,209
)
(9,041
)
(978
)
(8,063
)
Adjusted EBITDA
$
32,619

$
29,759

$
2,860

$
85,583

$
66,881

$
18,702

________________________________________________________
(3) Depreciation and amortization expense includes $11,548 and $4,118 of depreciation and amortization expense, $1,405 and $796 of lease intangible amortization, and $62 and $0 of amortization for lease incentives in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense includes $32,875 and $8,741 of depreciation and amortization expense, $5,198 and $1,652 of lease intangible amortization, and $182 and $0 of amortization for lease incentives in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(4) The Company’s pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities includes adjustments for the following items for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) net income (loss) of $(9,635) and $1,633 , (ii) interest expense of $474 and $793 , (iii) depreciation and amortization expense of $299 and $240 , (iv) principal collections of finance leases of $3,723 and $14,685 , and (v) asset impairment charges of $10,508 and $0 , respectively. The Company’s pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities includes adjustments for the following items for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) net income (loss) of $(7,278) and $4,614 , (ii) interest expense of $1,422 and $2,066 , (iii) depreciation and amortization expense of $910 and $922 , (iv) principal collections of finance leases of $10,638 and $26,344 , and (v) asset impairment charges of $10,508 and $0 , respectively.
(5) Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of the following items for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) equity based compensation of $368 and $114 , (ii) provision for income taxes of $1 and $119 , (iii) interest expense of $1,185 and $206 , and (iv) depreciation and amortization expense of $1,450 and $356 , respectively. Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of the following items for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) equity based compensation of $1,099 and $114 , (ii) provision for income taxes of $21 and $119 , (iii) interest expense of $3,630 and $277 , and (iv) depreciation and amortization expense of $4,291 and $468 , respectively.
Revenues
Total revenues increased by $19,153 and $68,259 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, primarily from acquisitions of leasing equipment in 2015 and the full impact of acquisitions completed in the second half of 2014 for lease income, maintenance revenue, rail revenues, and terminal services revenues.
In Equipment Leasing, lease income increased by $9,879 and $32,331 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, driven by the acquisitions of assets on-lease within the Aviation Leasing and Offshore Energy segments. Maintenance revenue increased by $4,085 and $8,866 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, as the number of assets subject to leases with maintenance arrangements increased in the comparable periods.

46


In Infrastructure, the Railroad segment acquisition in the second quarter of 2014 contributed higher rail revenues of $2,671 and $13,534 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. The Jefferson Terminal acquisition in the third quarter of 2014 contributed higher terminal services revenues and lease income of $2,693 and $12,712 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively.
Expenses
Total expenses increased by $25,742 and $76,364 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. This was driven by an increase in operating expenses of $8,519 and $37,493 , in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, specifically related to higher expense incurred for facility operations and compensation and benefits, primarily due to the inclusion of Jefferson Terminal and CMQR, both acquired during 2014.
Management fees and incentive allocation to affiliate increased by $2,908 and $6,970 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, attributable to an increase in the weighted average contributed capital and capital raised during the Company’s IPO.
Depreciation and amortization increased by $7,430 and $24,134 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, due to additional assets acquired in the Aviation Leasing and Offshore Energy segments in 2014, as well as the assets acquired in conjunction with the acquisition of Jefferson Terminal and CMQR and also placed into service during 2015.
Interest expense increased by $3,320 and $11,320 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, due to borrowings in connection with the CMQR, Jefferson Terminal, and FTAI Pride acquisitions.
Acquisition and transaction expenses increased by $1,398 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 due to increased investment activity, but decreased by $7,109 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 , as 2014 included costs related to the acquisitions of Jefferson Terminal and CMQR.
Other Income
Total other income decreased by $11,419 and $13,708 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. This was driven by lower equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities generated related to a shipping container joint venture of $11,284 and $11,949 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. Lower equity in earnings during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily driven by an asset impairment charge recorded by the shipping container joint venture. Additionally, the decrease in total other income was further affected by lower gains on sale of aviation equipment of $175 and $2,106 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively.
Net (Loss) Income
Net income attributable to shareholders decreased by $15,769 and $11,232 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, driven primarily by the changes discussed above, and also impacted by increases in net loss attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries.
Adjusted Net Income
Adjusted Net Income was $1,858 and $10,350 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, decreasing by $3,249 and $5,882 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes in Net (loss) income attributable to shareholders noted above, the decrease in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was also driven by lower acquisition and transaction expenses during 2015. The decrease in each respective period was offset by increases from equity-based compensation expense and equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, which are excluded from Adjusted Net Income.

47


Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA was $32,619 and $85,583 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, increasing by $2,860 and $18,702 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes in Net (loss) income attributable to shareholders noted above, the increase in each respective period was primarily due to increased (i) equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, (ii) depreciation and amortization expense from additional assets acquired or placed into service across nearly all segments, (iii) interest expense on borrowings executed in the second half of 2014 (iv) equity-based compensation expense and (v) principal collections on direct finance leases. The increase in three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was offset by (i) a decrease in our pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities and (ii) higher non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA, mainly due to Jefferson Terminal. The increase in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was also offset by lower acquisition and transaction expenses, mainly due to costs to acquire Jefferson Terminal and CMQR, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 .
Aviation Leasing Segment
In our Aviation Leasing segment, we own and manage 58 aviation assets, including 41 commercial jet engines and 17 commercial passenger aircraft.
As of September 30, 2015 , 24 of our commercial jet engines and 15 of our commercial aircraft were leased to operators or other third parties. Aviation assets currently off lease are either undergoing repair and/or maintenance, or are currently held in short term storage awaiting a future lease. Our aviation equipment was approximately 82% utilized as of September 30, 2015 , based on the equity value of our on-hire leasing equipment as a percentage of the total equity value of our leasing equipment. Our aircraft assets currently have a weighted average remaining lease term of 30 months, and our engine assets, currently on-lease, have an average remaining lease term of 17 months. The chart below describes the assets in our Aviation Leasing segment:
Jet Engine Assets
Engine Type
Number
Manufacturer
Aircraft Compatibility
CFM56-3
11
CFMI
B737-300 / B737-400 / B737-500
CFM56-5
1
CFMI
A320
CFM56-7
2
CFMI
B737-NG
CF6-80
8
General Electric
B747 / B767
PW2037
6
Pratt & Whitney
B757
PW4056
5
Pratt & Whitney
B747 / B767
RB211
6
Rolls Royce
B757
V2527-A5
2
IAE
A320 / A321 / A319
Aircraft Assets
Airframe Type
Number
Manufacturer
B747-400
1
Boeing
B757-200
2
Boeing
B767-300ER
2
Boeing
A320-200
3
Airbus
B737-800
4
Boeing
B737-700
5
Boeing


48


The following table presents our results of operations and reconciliation of Net Income attributable to shareholders to Adjusted Net Income for the Aviation Leasing segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Revenues
Equipment leasing revenues
Lease income
$
10,664

$
4,031

$
6,633

$
30,211

$
10,018

$
20,193

Maintenance revenue
5,510

1,425

4,085

12,895

4,029

8,866

Other revenue
—

3

(3
)
1,120

3

1,117

Total revenues
16,174

5,459

10,715

44,226

14,050

30,176

Expenses












Operating expenses
1,208

600

608

1,923

1,453

470

Depreciation and amortization
6,122

2,443

3,679

16,774

6,146

10,628

Total expenses
7,330

3,043

4,287

18,697

7,599

11,098

Other income












Gain on sale of equipment, net
1,674

1,849

(175
)
1,958

4,064

(2,106
)
Interest income
3

6

(3
)
11

20

(9
)
Total other income
1,677

1,855

(178
)
1,969

4,084

(2,115
)
Income before income taxes
10,521

4,271

6,250

27,498

10,535

16,963

Provision (benefit) for income taxes
308

(31
)
339

720

307

413

Net Income attributable to shareholders
$
10,213

$
4,302

$
5,911

$
26,778

$
10,228

$
16,550

Add: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
308

(31
)
339

720

307

413

Add: Equity-based compensation expense
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Cash payments for income taxes


—



(227
)
—

(227
)
Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Income
—

—

—

—

—

—

Adjusted Net Income
$
10,521

$
4,271

$
6,250

$
27,271

$
10,535

$
16,736


49


The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Net Income attributable to shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA for the Aviation Leasing segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Net Income attributable to shareholders
$
10,213

$
4,302

$
5,911

$
26,778

$
10,228

$
16,550

Add: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
308

(31
)
339

720

307

413

Add: Equity-based compensation expense
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Depreciation and amortization expense (1)
7,589

3,239

4,350

22,154

7,798

14,356

Add: Interest expense
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Principal collections on direct finance leases
—

500

(500
)
—

689

(689
)
Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—
—
—
Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA
—

—

—

—
—
—
Adjusted EBITDA
$
18,110

$
8,010

$
10,100

$
49,652

$
19,022

$
30,630

______________________________________________________________________________________
(1) Depreciation and amortization expense includes $6,122 and $2,443 of depreciation expense, $1,405 and $796 of lease intangible amortization, and $62 and $0 of amortization for lease incentives in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense includes $16,774 and $6,146 of depreciation expense, $5,198 and $1,652 of lease intangible amortization, and $182 and $0 of amortization for lease incentives in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Revenues
Total revenue in the Aviation Leasing segment increased by $ 10,715 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 , due to higher lease income and maintenance revenue, driven by newly acquired assets on-lease. Lease income increased by $ 6,633 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 mainly due to (i) higher aircraft lease income of $6,303 primarily driven by the purchase of ten aircraft with in-place leases during the fourth quarter of 2014 and two in the third quarter of 2015, and (ii) higher engine lease income of $993 primarily driven by net nine additional jet engines on-lease, offset by (iii) $671 of lease amortization. Maintenance revenue increased by $ 4,085 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 due t o net nine addi tional aircraft and net twelve additional jet engines on-lease in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 .
Total revenues in the Aviation Leasing segment increased by $ 30,176 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 , driven by higher lease income, maintenance revenue, and other revenue. Lease income increased by $ 20,193 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 mainly due to (i) higher aircraft lease income of $20,908 primarily driven by ten aircraft acquired with in-place leases during the fourth quarter of 2014 and two in the third quarter of 2015 less two on-lease aircraft sold in the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and (ii) higher engine lease income of $2,975 primarily driven by net seventeen additional engines on-lease in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014, offset by (iii) by lease amortization of $3,728 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Maintenance revenue increased by $ 8,866 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 due to ten additional aircraft and net eight additional jet engines on-lease in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Other revenue increased by $ 1,117 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 primarily due to income recognized from the forfeiture of two security deposits in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , which did not occur in the prior year.


50


Expenses
Total expenses in the Aviation Leasing segment increased by $ 4,287 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 . This increase was primarily driven by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $ 3,679 , driven by the depreciation of twelve aircraft and net eight jet engines, and higher operating expenses of $608 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 . The increase in operating expenses was primarily the result of increased (i) repair and maintenance expenses of $550 associated with an on-lease aircraft, (ii) other operating expenses of $132 mainly driven by engine transportation and storage of jet engines, software related costs, and director's fees, and (iii) professional fees of $128 related to newly purchased assets and legal fees for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 . These increases were offset by decreased (i) insurance expense of $57 as the number of aircraft and jet engines requiring lessor coverage decreased and (ii) bad debt expense of $127 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 .

Total expenses in the Aviation Leasing segment increased by $ 11,098 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 . This increase was primarily driven by depreciation and amortization expense, which increased by $ 10,628 primarily due to net ten aircraft and net seven jet engines in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and an increase in operating expenses of $470 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 . The increase in operating expenses was driven by higher (i) repairs and maintenance expense of $395 primarily due to costs associated with an on-lease aircraft offset by repair and maintenance costs associated with nine jet engines in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to one jet engine in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , (ii) other operating expenses of $284 primarily due to increased transportation and storage of jet engines, and software related costs, and (iii) professional fees of $59 primarily due to increased tax consulting fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 . The increase in operating expenses was offset by decreased (i) insurance expense of $168 as the number of aircraft and jet engines requiring lessor coverage decreased and (ii) bad debt expense of $165 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 .

Other Income
Total other income in the Aviation Leasing segment decreased by $ 178 and $2,115 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, as the Company recognized a lower gain on sale of equipment of $ 175 and $ 2,106 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively.
Net Income
Net Income attributable to shareholders increased by $5,911 and $16,550 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, driven by the changes discussed above.
Adjusted Net Income
Adjusted Net Income in the Aviation Leasing segment was $10,521 and $27,271 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, increasing by $6,250 and $16,736 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, primarily driven by the changes to net income attributable to shareholders noted above.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA in the Aviation Leasing segment was $ 18,110 and $49,652 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, increasing by $ 10,100 and $30,630 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes in Net Income attributable to shareholders noted above, this movement was primarily due to additional depreciation and amortization expense for the additional aircraft and engines owned and on-lease in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 .

Offshore Energy Segment
In our Offshore Energy segment, we own one remotely operated vehicle (“ROV”) support vessel, one construction support vessel and one anchor handling tug supply (“AHTS”) vessel. In addition we have contracted with a Norwegian shipyard

51


to build a new inspection, maintenance, and repair (“IMR”) vessel. The chart below describes the assets in our Offshore Energy segment as of September 30, 2015 :
Offshore Energy Assets
Asset Type
Year Built
Description
Lease Expiration
Economic Interest (%)
AHTS Vessel
2010
Anchor handling tug supply vessel  with accommodation for 30  personnel and a total bollard pull  of 68.5 tons
November 2023
100%
Construction Support Vessel
2014
Construction support vessel with
250-ton crane, 2,000 square meter
deck space, a moon pool, and
accommodation for 100 personnel
October 2015 (firm period)
100%
ROV Support Vessel
2011
Construction support vessel with
accommodation for 120 personnel,
a moon pool, and a 50-ton crane
April 2019
85%
IMR Vessel
EstimatedQ1 2016
IMR vessel with 150-ton crane,
1,100 square meter deck space, a
moon pool, accommodation for 90
personnel
Estimated March 2024
50%

The following table presents our results of operations and reconciliation of Net Income attributable to shareholders to Adjusted Net Income for the Offshore Energy segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Revenues
Equipment leasing revenues












Lease income
$
5,816

$
2,570

$
3,246

$
18,419

$
6,281

$
12,138

Finance lease income
418

423

(5
)
1,247

1,288

(41
)
Other revenue
201

30

171

568

30

538

Total revenues
6,435

3,023

3,412

20,234

7,599

12,635

Expenses
Operating expenses
724

150

574

1,685

396

1,289

Depreciation and amortization
1,489

561

928

4,467

1,310

3,157

Interest expense
946

181

765

2,854

252

2,602

Total expenses
3,159

892

2,267

9,006

1,958

7,048

Other income
Interest income
115

46

69

368

46

322

Total other income
115

46

69

368

46

322

Income before income taxes
3,391

2,177

1,214

11,596

5,687

5,909

Provision for income taxes
—

—

—

—

—

—

Net Income
3,391

2,177

1,214

11,596

5,687

5,909

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries
196

179

17

566

520

46

Net Income attributable to shareholders
$
3,195

$
1,998

$
1,197

$
11,030

$
5,167

$
5,863

Add: Provision for income taxes
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Equity-based compensation expense
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

—

—

—


52


Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Cash payments for income taxes
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Income
—

—

—

—

—

—

Adjusted Net Income
$
3,195

$
1,998

$
1,197

$
11,030

$
5,167

$
5,863


The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Net Income attributable to shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA for the Offshore Energy segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Net Income attributable to shareholders
$
3,195

$
1,998

$
1,197

$
11,030

$
5,167

$
5,863

Add: Provision for income taxes
—

—

—

—
—
—
Add: Equity-based compensation expense
—

—

—

—
—
—
Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

—
—
—
Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—
—
—
Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—

—

—

—
—
—
Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—
—
—
Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Depreciation and amortization expense
1,489

561

928

4,467

1,310

3,157

Add: Interest expense
946

181

765

2,854

252

2,602

Add: Principal collections on direct finance leases
88

75

13

251

214

37

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—
—
—
Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—
—
—
Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA (1)
(86
)
(90
)
4

(259
)
(273
)
14

Adjusted EBITDA
$
5,632

$
2,725

$
2,907

$
18,343

$
6,670

$
11,673

________________________________________________________
(1) Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of the following items for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) depreciation expense of $57 and $56 , (ii) and interest expense of $29 and $34 , respectively. Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of the following items for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) depreciation expense of $169 and $168 , (ii) and interest expense of $90 and $105 , respectively.
Revenues
Total revenues in the Offshore Energy segment increased by $3,412 and $12,635 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, driven by higher lease income derived from a new offshore construction support vessel acquired and put into service in September 2014.

53



Expenses
Total expenses in the Offshore Energy segment increased by $2,267 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. The offshore construction support vessel placed into service in September 2014 is the primary driver of increased depreciation and amortization of $928, increased interest expense of $765 and increased operating expenses of $574 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in operating expenses was primarily the result of increased (i) management fees of $162 due to hiring a manager for the offshore construction support vessel in June 2015, (ii) insurance expense of $146 related to the offshore construction support vessel placed into service in September 2014, (iii) professional fees of $91, and (iv) other operating expenses of $70 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014.
Total expenses in the Offshore Energy segment increased by $7,048 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The offshore construction support vessel placed into service in September 2014 is the primary driver of increased depreciation and amortization of $3,157, increased interest expense of $2,602 and increased operating expenses of $1,289 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in operating expenses was primarily the result of increased (i) management fees of $255 due to hiring a manager for the offshore construction support vessel in June 2015, (ii) insurance expense of $491 related to the offshore construction support vessel placed into service in September 2014, (iii) facility operations of $287, and (iv) other operating expenses of $134 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Other Income
Total other income in the Offshore Energy segment increased by $69 and $322 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, primarily due to increased interest income and fees earned related to the loan made to our partner in the MT6015 joint venture.
Net Income
Net Income attributable to shareholders increased by $1,197 and $5,863 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, driven by net loss attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries, as well as the changes discussed above.
Adjusted Net Income
Adjusted Net Income was $3,195 and $11,030 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, increasing by $1,197 and $5,863 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. This increase in each respective period was due to the changes in Net Income attributable to shareholders noted above.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA was $5,632 and $18,343 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, increasing by $2,907 and $11,673 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. In addition to the changes in Net Income attributable to shareholders, the increase in each respective period was primarily driven by higher (i) depreciation and amortization expense, (ii) interest expense and (iii) principal collections on the direct finance leases related to an offshore construction vessel.

54



Shipping Containers Segment
In our Shipping Containers segment, we own, either directly or through a joint venture, interests in approximately 145,000 maritime shipping containers and related equipment through three separate portfolios. Substantially all of these shipping containers are currently leased to operators or other third parties and, as of September 30, 2015 , are 67.7% levered. The weighted average remaining lease term for these assets is 1.7 years. The chart below describes the assets in our Shipping Containers segment as of September 30, 2015 :
Shipping Containers Assets
Number
Type
Average Age
Lease Type
Customer Mix
Economic Interest (%)
Portfolio #1
103,000
20’ Dry
20’ Reefer
20’ Specials
40’ Dry
40’ HC Dry
40’ HC Reefer
40’ Specials
45’ Dry
~8 Years
Direct Finance Lease/Operating Lease
7 Customers
51%
Portfolio #2
39,000
20’ Dry
40’ Dry
40’ HC Dry
~10 years
Direct Finance Lease
1 Customer
100%
Portfolio #3
3,000
45’ Dry
53’ Dry
53’ Chassis
~7 years
Direct Finance Lease
1 Customer
100%
The following table presents our results of operations and reconciliation of Net Income attributable to shareholders to Adjusted Net Income for the Shipping Containers segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Revenues
Equipment leasing revenues
Finance lease income
$
1,726

$
2,064

$
(338
)
$
5,496

$
6,294

$
(798
)
Other revenue
25

25

—

75

75

—

Total revenues
1,751

2,089

(338
)
5,571

6,369

(798
)
Expenses






Operating expenses
128

60

68

298

179

119

Interest expense
591

699

(108
)
1,858

2,155

(297
)
Total expenses
719

759

(40
)
2,156

2,334

(178
)
Other income (expense)
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated entities
(9,584
)
1,700

(11,284
)
(7,118
)
4,831

(11,949
)
Other income (expense), net
(5
)
1

(6
)
(14
)
(19
)
5

Total other income (expense)
(9,589
)
1,701

(11,290
)
(7,132
)
4,812

(11,944
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
(8,557
)
3,031

(11,588
)
(3,717
)
8,847

(12,564
)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(164
)
(7
)
(157
)
(129
)
111

(240
)
Net Income (loss) attributable to shareholders
$
(8,393
)
$
3,038

$
(11,431
)
$
(3,588
)
$
8,736

$
(12,324
)
Add: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(164
)
(7
)
(157
)
(129
)
111

(240
)
Add: Equity-based compensation expense
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

—

—

—


55


Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
5

(1
)
6

14

19

(5
)
Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—



—

—

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities (1)
924

1,762

(838
)
3,390

4,893

(1,503
)
Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Cash payments for income taxes
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
9,584

(1,700
)
11,284

7,118

(4,831
)
11,949

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Income
—

—

—

—

—

—

Adjusted Net Income
$
1,956

$
3,092

$
(1,136
)
$
6,805

$
8,928

$
(2,123
)
________________________________________________________
(1) Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities includes the Company’s proportionate share of the unconsolidated entities’ net income adjusted for asset impairment charges of $10,508 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 . Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities includes the Company’s proportionate share of the unconsolidated entities’ net income adjusted for loss on extinguishment of debt of $62 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 .

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Net Income attributable to shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA for the Shipping Containers segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Net Income (loss) attributable to shareholders
$
(8,393
)
$
3,038

$
(11,431
)
$
(3,588
)
$
8,736

$
(12,324
)
Add: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(164
)
(7
)
(157
)
(129
)
111

(240
)
Add: Equity-based compensation expense
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
5

(1
)
6

14

19

(5
)
Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Depreciation and amortization expense
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Interest expense
591

699

(108
)
1,858

2,155

(297
)
Add: Principal collections on direct finance leases
11,182

2,788

8,394

17,161

8,125

9,036

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities (2)
5,369

17,351

(11,982
)
16,200

33,946

(17,746
)
Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
9,584

(1,700
)
11,284

7,118

(4,831
)
11,949

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA
—

—

—

—

—

—

Adjusted EBITDA
$
18,174

$
22,168

$
(3,994
)
$
38,634

$
48,261

$
(9,627
)
_______________________________________________________
(2) The Company’s pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities includes adjustments for the following items for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) net income (loss) of $(9,635) and $1,633 , (ii) interest expense of $474 and $793 , (iii) depreciation and amortization expense of $299 and $240 , (iv) principal collections of finance leases of $3,723 and $14,685 , and (v) asset impairment charges of $10,508 and $0 , respectively. The Company’s pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities includes the following items for nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) net income (loss) of $(7,278) and $4,614 , (ii) interest expense of $1,422 and $2,066 , (iii) depreciation and amortization expense of $910 and $922 , (iv) principal collections of finance leases of $10,638 and $26,344 , and (v) asset impairment charges of $10,508 and $0 , respectively.

56


Revenues
Total revenues in the Shipping Containers segment decreased by $338 and $798 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 respectively, principally driven by lower finance lease income as a result of the amortization of the underlying principal balances.
Expenses
Total expenses in the Shipping Containers segment decreased by $40 and $178 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. This was driven by a decrease in interest expense of $108 and $297 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 respectively, primarily related to lower principal balances on the term loans entered into to finance the acquisition of shipping containers in prior periods. This was offset by higher operating expenses of $68 and $119 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, driven by an increase in management fees.
Other Income
Total other income in the Shipping Containers segment decreased $11,290 and $11,944 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, driven by lower equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities from our shipping container joint venture by $11,284 and $11,949 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to an impairment recognized by the shipping container joint venture.
Net Income (loss)
Net income attributable to shareholders decreased by $11,431 and $12,324 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, driven by the changes discussed above.
Adjusted Net Income
Adjusted Net Income was $1,956 and $6,805 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , decreasing by $1,136 and $2,123 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes in Net Income attributable to shareholders noted above, the decrease in each respective period was primarily impacted by lower equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities, a lower pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities, and a higher tax benefit for income taxes.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA was $18,174 and $38,634 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , decreasing by $3,994 and $9,627 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes in Net Income attributable to shareholders noted above, the decrease in each respective period was primarily due to a lower pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities driven by an asset impairment charge related to a shipping container joint venture, offset by higher principal collections on direct finance leases and lower equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities.

57


Jefferson Terminal Segment
The following table presents our results of operations and reconciliation of Net loss attributable to shareholders to Adjusted Net Loss for the Jefferson Terminal segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Revenues
Infrastructure revenues









Lease income
$
1,030

$
439

$
591

$
3,850

$
439

$
3,411

Terminal services revenues
3,202

1,100

2,102

10,401

1,100

9,301

Total revenues
4,232

1,539

2,693

14,251

1,539

12,712

Expenses
Operating expenses
8,599

2,479

6,120

24,773

2,530

22,243

Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

284

(284
)
—

5,414

(5,414
)
Depreciation and amortization
3,469

704

2,765

10,238

749

9,489

Interest expense
2,988

456

2,532

9,094

456

8,638

Total expenses
15,056

3,923

11,133

44,105

9,149

34,956

Other income
Interest income
41

—

41

83

—

83

Other income, net
20

153

(133
)
20

153

(133
)
Total other income
61

153

(92
)
103

153

(50
)
Loss before income taxes
(10,763
)
(2,231
)
(8,532
)
(29,751
)
(7,457
)
(22,294
)
Provision for income taxes
4

194

(190
)
53

296

(243
)
Net loss
(10,767
)
(2,425
)
(8,342
)
(29,804
)
(7,753
)
(22,051
)
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries
(4,454
)
(2,264
)
(2,190
)
(12,653
)
(2,264
)
(10,389
)
Net loss attributable to shareholders
$
(6,313
)
$
(161
)
$
(6,152
)
$
(17,151
)
$
(5,489
)
$
(11,662
)
Add: Provision for income taxes
4

194

(190
)
53

296

(243
)
Add: Equity-based compensation expense
903

284

619

2,675

284

2,391

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

284

(284
)
—

5,414

(5,414
)
Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Cash payments for income taxes
3

—

3

(280
)
—

(280
)
Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Loss (1)
(359
)
(233
)
(126
)
(1,015
)
(233
)
(782
)
Adjusted Net Loss
$
(5,762
)
$
368

$
(6,130
)
$
(15,718
)
$
272

$
(15,990
)
______________________________________________________
(1) Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Loss is comprised of the following for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively: (i) equity-based compensation of $357 and $114 , (ii) provision for income tax of $1 and $119 , and (iii) cash tax payments of $1 and $0 . Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Loss is comprised of the following for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively: (i) equity-based compensation of $1,064 and $114 , (ii) provision for income tax of $21 and $119 , and (iii) cash tax payments of $(70) and $0 .

58



The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Net loss attributable to shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA for the Jefferson Terminal segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Net loss attributable to shareholders
$
(6,313
)
$
(161
)
$
(6,152
)
$
(17,151
)
$
(5,489
)
$
(11,662
)
Add: Provision for income taxes
4

194

(190
)
53

296

(243
)
Add: Equity-based compensation expense
903

284

619

2,675

284

2,391

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

284

(284
)
—

5,414

(5,414
)
Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—



—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Depreciation and amortization expense
3,469

704

2,765

10,238

749

9,489

Add: Interest expense
2,988

456

2,532

9,094

456

8,638

Add: Principal collections on direct finance leases
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA (2)
(2,878
)
(705
)
(2,173
)
(8,682
)
(705
)
(7,977
)
Adjusted EBITDA
$
(1,827
)
$
1,056

$
(2,883
)
$
(3,773
)
$
1,005

$
(4,778
)
________________________________________________________
(2) Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of the following items for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) equity-based compensation of $357 and $114 , (ii) provision for income taxes of $1 and $119 , (iii) interest expense of $1,150 and $172 , and (iv) depreciation and amortization expense of $1,370 and $300 , respectively. Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of the following items for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (i) equity-based compensation of $1,064 and $114 , (ii) provision for income taxes of $21 and $119 , (iii) interest expense of $3,525 and $172 , and (iv) depreciation and amortization expense of $4,072 and $300 , respectively.
Revenues
Total revenues for the Jefferson Terminal segment increased in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 by $2,693 and $12,712 , respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 due to the increase in both lease income and terminal service revenue. Lease income is derived from the leasing of rail cars that were purchased in 2014. Lease income increased by $591 and $3,411 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , as lease contracts were entered into starting August 2014. Terminal services revenue in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased by $2,102 and $9,301 , respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , as the acquisition of Jefferson Terminal occurred on August 27, 2014 thereby affecting both the three and nine month periods.
Expenses
Total expenses in the Jefferson Terminal segment increased by $11,133 and $34,956 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. Expenses increased due to higher (i) operating expenses of $6,120 and $22,243 incurred in connection with terminal operations, including $619 and $2,391 of equity-based compensation expense, (ii) amortization expense related to acquired customer relationships of $590 and $3,012 (iii) depreciation expense of $2,175 and $6,477 related to tank railcars and property, plant and equipment and (iv) interest expense of $2,532 and $8,638 related to term debt used to finance the purchase of Jefferson Terminal, as well as amounts outstanding on previously issued municipal bonds, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively.
Net Loss

59


Net loss attributable to shareholders was $ 6,313 and $17,151 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, increasing by $6,152 and $11,662 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes discussed above, Net loss attributable to shareholders was also affected by net loss attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries, which was $ 4,454 and $12,653 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , an increase of $2,190 and $10,389 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.
Adjusted Net Loss
Adjusted Net Loss was $5,762 and $15,718 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, increasing by $6,130 and $15,990 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes in Net loss attributable to shareholders noted above, each respective period was impacted by the absence of acquisition and transaction expenses of $284 and $5,414 incurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively, related to the acquisition of Jefferson Terminal. Adjusted Net Loss was also affected by higher non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Loss of $126 and $782 offset by higher equity-based compensation expense of $619 and $2,391 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA was $(1,827) and $(3,773) in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , decreasing by $2,883 and $4,778 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively.
In the three months ended September 30, 2015 , in addition to the changes in Net loss attributable to shareholders noted above, Adjusted EBITDA was impacted by (i) higher adjustment for the non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA of $ 2,173 , comprised of equity-based compensation expense of $243 , provision for income taxes of $(118) , interest expense of $978 , and depreciation and amortization expense of $1,070 and (ii) lower acquisition and transaction expenses of $ 284 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 . These were offset by higher (i) depreciation and amortization expense of $ 2,765 related to acquired customer relationships, tank railcars and property, plant and equipment, (ii) interest expense of $ 2,532 and (iii) equity-based compensation expense of $ 619 , in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 .
In the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , in addition to the changes in Net loss attributable to shareholders noted above, Adjusted EBITDA was impacted by (i) higher adjustment for the non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA of $7,977 , comprised of equity-based compensation expense of $950 , provision for income taxes of $(98) , interest expense of $3,353 , and depreciation and amortization expense of $3,772 and (ii) lower acquisition and transaction expenses of $ (5,414) in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 . These were offset by higher (i) depreciation and amortization expense of $ 9,489 related to acquired customer relationships, tank railcars and property, plant and equipment, (ii) interest expense of $ 8,638 and (iii) equity-based compensation expense of $ 2,391 , in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 .

Railroad Segment
The following table presents our results of operations and reconciliation of Net loss attributable to shareholders to Adjusted Net Loss for the Railroad segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Revenues
Infrastructure revenues









Rail revenues
$
6,641

$
3,970

$
2,671

$
18,488

$
4,954

$
13,534

Total revenues
6,641

3,970

2,671

18,488

4,954

13,534

Expenses
Operating expenses
7,220

6,071

1,149

21,519

8,147

13,372

Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

420

(420
)
—

5,628

(5,628
)
Depreciation and amortization
468

410

58

1,396

536

860


60


Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Interest expense
143

12

131

434

12

422

Total expenses
7,831

6,913

918

23,349

14,323

9,026

Other income
Gain on sale of equipment, net
72

—

72

79

—

79

Total other income
72

—

72

79

—

79

Loss before income taxes
(1,118
)
(2,943
)
1,825

(4,782
)
(9,369
)
4,587

Provision for income taxes
—

—

—

—

—

—

Net loss
(1,118
)
(2,943
)
1,825

(4,782
)
(9,369
)
4,587

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries
(54
)
—

(54
)
(166
)
—

(166
)
Net loss attributable to shareholders
$
(1,064
)
$
(2,943
)
$
1,879

$
(4,616
)
$
(9,369
)
$
4,753

Add: Provision for income taxes
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Equity-based compensation expense
191

—

191

995

—

995

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

420

(420
)
—

5,628

(5,628
)
Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Cash payments for income taxes
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Loss (1)
(11
)
—

(11
)
(35
)
—

(35
)
Adjusted Net Loss
$
(884
)
$
(2,523
)
$
1,639

$
(3,656
)
$
(3,741
)
$
85

______________________________________________________
(1) Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Loss is comprised of equity-based compensation of $11 and $0 , respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 . Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Loss is comprised of equity-based compensation of $35 and $0 , respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 .

61



The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Net loss attributable to shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA for the Railroad segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,

Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

Change
2015

2014

2015

2014

(in thousands)
Net loss attributable to shareholders
$
(1,064
)
$
(2,943
)
$
1,879

$
(4,616
)
$
(9,369
)
$
4,753

Add: Provision for income taxes
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Equity-based compensation expense
191

—

191

995

—

995

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
—

420

(420
)
—

5,628

(5,628
)
Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Depreciation and amortization expense
468

410

58

1,396

536

860

Add: Interest expense
143

12

131

434

12

422

Add: Principal collections on direct finance leases
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA (1)
(40
)
—

(40
)
(100
)
—

(100
)
Adjusted EBITDA
$
(302
)
$
(2,101
)
$
1,799

$
(1,891
)
$
(3,193
)
$
1,302

________________________________________________________
(1) Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of the following items for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 : (i) equity-based compensation of $11 and $0 , (ii) interest expense of $6 and $0 , and (iii) depreciation and amortization expense of $23 and $0 , respectively. Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of the following items for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 : (i) equity-based compensation of $35 and $0 , (ii) interest expense of $15 and $0 , and (iii) depreciation and amortization expense of $50 and $0 .
Revenues

Total Railroad segment revenues increased by $2,671 and $13,534 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 . The acquisition of CMQR was finalized by June 30, 2014 and therefore impacts the comparability of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to the same period in 2014. The increase in the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 resulted from increased volumes and customers in during 2015.
Expenses
Total expenses in the Railroad segment were $7,831 and $23,349 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively as compared to total expenses of $6,913 and $14,323 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively.
Expenses were comprised of (i) operating expenses of $7,220 and $21,519 incurred in connection with railroad operations, (ii) depreciation expense of $457 and $1,360 related to property, plant, and equipment, (iii) amortization expense of $11 and $36 related to acquired customer relationships, and (iv) interest expense of $143 and $434 related to borrowings under the CMQR Credit Agreement used to finance construction and improvements to the railroad, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively. Expenses in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 were mainly comprised of acquisition and transaction expenses and operating expenses incurred in connection with railroad operations, since the acquisition occurred during the second quarter of 2014.
Net Loss

62


Net loss attributable to shareholders was $1,064 and $4,616 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively compared to a net loss of $ 2,943 and $9,369 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes discussed above, the increase was also due to a net loss attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries of $54 and $166 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively.
Adjusted Net Loss
Adjusted Net Loss was $ 884 and $3,656 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , increasing by $1,639 and $85 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes in Net loss attributable to shareholders noted above, Adjusted Net Loss was impacted by equity-based compensation expense of $ 191 and $995 recorded in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively, and the absence of acquisition and transaction expenses of $420 and $5,628 incurred in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , in connection with the acquisition of CMQR, respectively. Adjusted Net Loss was also affected by the non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Loss of $11 and $35 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA was $(302) and $(1,891) in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , increasing by $1,799 and $1,302 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively.
In addition to the changes in Net loss attributable to shareholders noted above, Adjusted EBITDA was also impacted by higher (i) equity-based compensation expense of $ 191 and 995 , (ii) depreciation and amortization expense of $ 58 and $860 , and (iii) interest expense of $ 131 and 422 , offset by increased non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA of $ (40) and (100) , and the absence of acquisition and transaction expenses, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively.

Corporate
The following table presents our results of operations and reconciliation of Net loss attributable to shareholders to Adjusted Net Loss for Corporate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Expenses
General and administrative
2,568

401

2,167

4,905

1,349

3,556

Acquisition and transaction expenses
2,206

104

2,102

4,172

239

3,933

Management fees and incentive allocation to affiliate
4,606

1,698

2,908

10,505

3,535

6,970

Interest expense
—

—

—

—

45

(45
)
Total expenses
9,380

2,203

7,177

19,582

5,168

14,414

Loss before income taxes
(9,380
)
(2,203
)
(7,177
)
(19,582
)
(5,168
)
(14,414
)
Provision for income taxes
2

—

2

2

—

2

Net loss
(9,382
)
(2,203
)
(7,179
)
(19,584
)
(5,168
)
(14,416
)
Less: Loss attributable to non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries
(6
)
—

(6
)
(4
)
—

(4
)
Net loss attributable to shareholders
$
(9,376
)
$
(2,203
)
$
(7,173
)
$
(19,580
)
$
(5,168
)
$
(14,412
)
Add: Provision for income taxes
2

—

2

2

—

2

Add: Equity-based compensation expense
—

—

—

24

—

24

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
2,206

104

2,102

4,172

239

3,933

Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—



—

—

—

—

Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—


63


Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted Net Income from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Cash payments for income taxes
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted Net Loss
—

—

—

—

—

—

Adjusted Net Loss
$
(7,168
)
$
(2,099
)
$
(5,069
)
$
(15,382
)
$
(4,929
)
$
(10,453
)
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Net loss attributable to shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA for Corporate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Three Months Ended September 30,
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Change
2015
2014
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Net loss attributable to shareholders
$
(9,376
)
$
(2,203
)
$
(7,173
)
$
(19,580
)
$
(5,168
)
$
(14,412
)
Add: Provision for income taxes
2

—

2

2

—

2

Add: Equity-based compensation expense
—

—

—

24

—

24

Add: Acquisition and transaction expenses
2,206

104

2,102

4,172

239

3,933

Add: Losses on the modification or extinguishment of debt and capital lease obligations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Asset impairment charges
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Incentive allocations
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Depreciation and amortization expense
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Interest expense
—

—

—

—

45

(45
)
Add: Principal collections on direct finance leases
—

—

—

—

—

—

Add: Pro-rata share of Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

—

—

—

—

—

Less: Non-controlling share of Adjusted EBITDA
—

—

—

—

—

—

Adjusted EBITDA
$
(7,168
)
$
(2,099
)
$
(5,069
)
$
(15,382
)
$
(4,884
)
$
(10,498
)
Expenses
In Corporate, total expenses increased by $7,177 and $14,414 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. This was mainly due to higher (i) management fees of $2,908 and $6,970 attributable to an increase in the weighted average contributed capital and capital raised during the Company’s IPO, (ii) general and administrative expenses of $2,167 and $3,556 as we expand our customer base and lines of businesses, including reimbursements to our manager and (iii) acquisition and transaction expenses for additional investment activities of $2,102 and $3,933 , in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively.
Adjusted Net Loss
Adjusted Net Loss was $7,168 and $15,382 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , increasing by $5,069 and $10,453 , as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes in Net loss attributable to shareholders noted above, Adjusted Net Loss was primarily impacted by higher acquisition and transaction expenses incurred for potential acquisition opportunities in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , as well as equity-based compensation recorded in 2015, which is excluded from Adjusted Net Loss.

64


Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA was $(7,168) and $(15,382) in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , decreasing by $5,069 and $10,498 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 , respectively. In addition to the changes in Net loss attributable to shareholders noted above, the decrease in each respective period was primarily impacted by higher acquisition and transaction expenses incurred for potential acquisition opportunities in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , as well as equity-based compensation expense recorded in 2015.

Transactions with Affiliates and Affiliated Entities
We are managed by FIG LLC (the “Manager”), an affiliate of Fortress, pursuant to a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) which provides for the Company to bear obligations for management fees and expense reimbursements payable to the Manager. Our Management Agreement requires our Manager to manage our business affairs in conformity with a broad asset acquisition strategy adopted and monitored by our board of directors. From time to time, we may engage (subject to our strategy) in material transactions with our Manager or another entity managed by our Manager or one of its affiliates or other affiliates of Fortress, which may include, but are not limited to, certain financing arrangements, acquisition of assets, acquisition of debt obligations, debt, co-investments, and other assets that present an actual, potential or perceived conflict of interest. Please see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this filing for more information.
A non-controlling interest holder of Jefferson Terminal provides construction services for Jefferson Terminal. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , accounts payable due to this vendor was $4,093 and $14,025 , respectively.
Subsequent Events
On November 3, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on its common stock of $0.33 per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, payable on November 30, 2015 to the holders of record on November 20, 2015.


Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal uses of liquidity have been (i) acquisitions of transportation infrastructure and equipment, (ii) distributions to our partners, (iii) expenses associated with our operating activities and (iv) debt service obligations associated with our investments (all dollar amounts are expressed in thousands).
•
In the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , cash used for the purpose of making investments was $238,213 and $403,440, respectively.
•
In nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , distributions to shareholders were $ 44,917 and $ 43,410 , respectively, and distributions to non-controlling interest were $ 309 and $422 , respectively.
•
Uses of liquidity associated with our operating expenses are captured on a net basis in our cash flows from operating activities. Uses of liquidity associated with our debt obligations are captured in our cash flows from financing activities.
Our principal sources of liquidity to fund these uses have been (i) revenues from our infrastructure and equipment assets (including finance lease collections and maintenance reserve collections) net of operating expenses, (ii) borrowings, (iii) distributions received from unconsolidated investees, (iv) capital contributions from our shareholders and (v) proceeds from the issuance of common shares.
•
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , cash flows from operating activities, plus the principal collections on finance leases and maintenance reserve collections were $51,409 and $(16,484), respectively.
•
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , additional borrowings of $ 200 were obtained in connection with the CMQR Credit Agreement and we made total principal repayments of $ 19,764 . During nine months ended September 30, 2014 , additional borrowings of $175,349 were obtained in connection with the Jefferson Terminal Facility of $100 million, the FTAI Pride Credit Agreement of $75 million, and the CMQR Credit Agreement of $10 million and we made total principal repayments of $ 26,886 .
•
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , we received $3,081 and $13,249 in cash distributions from our unconsolidated investees, respectively, of which $ 160 and $ 6,942 was included in cash flows from operating activities, respectively.

65


•
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , proceeds from the sale of assets were $9,253 and $19,538, respectively.
•
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , capital contributions from shareholders were $ 295,879 and $ 290,930 , respectively, and capital contributions from non-controlling interests were $ 34,787 and $ 43,612 , respectively.
•
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , proceeds from the issuance of common stock were $351,059, net of issuance costs of $ 2,998 .
The Company is currently evaluating over $1.5 billion of potential Infrastructure and Equipment Leasing transactions which could occur within the next 12 months. However, as of the date of this filing, none of the above-referenced pipeline transactions or negotiations are definitive or included within the planned liquidity needs of the Company.

Historical Cash Flow
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014
The following table compares the historical cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 :
Nine Months Ended

September 30, 2015
September 30, 2014

(in thousands)
Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
26,870

$
(27,786
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(203,712)
(374,687)
Net cash provided by financing activities
603,016
438,128
Net cash provided by operating activities was $ 26,870 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $ 27,786 in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 , representing a $54,656 increase. Net loss was $ 19,384 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , compared to income of $ 2,361 in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 , a decrease of $21,745. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was driven by non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income which include a decrease in gain on sale of equipment of $2,027, an increase of (i) $24,134 relating to depreciation and amortization, (ii) $3,728 of amortization of lease intangibles and incentives, (iii) $11,949 in equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, and (iv) $3,410 of equity based compensation, offset by a decrease in operating distributions from an unconsolidated entity of $6,782 and a decrease due to security deposits and maintenance claims included in earnings of $439 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 . The increase was also driven by lower cash outflows related to accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $36,993 and higher cash inflows related to accounts receivable by $2,199 related to an increase in our customer base, offset by an increase in cash outflows for management fees payable of $1,641 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 .
Net cash used in investing activities was $ 203,712 and $ 374,687 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively, representing a $170,975 decrease. Cash used in the acquisition of leasing equipment, related lease intangibles and purchase deposits for aircraft and jet engines decreased year over year by $87,573 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 . Additionally, cash was used to fund the acquisition of Jefferson Terminal of $47,811 and purchase CMQR of $11,308 in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 , both of which did not occur in the nine months ending September 30, 2015 . In conjunction with Jefferson Terminal, the Company funded term loans and other receivables of $97,616 in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 . The Company also received $17,412 in principal collections on financing leases in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 , as compared to $9,028 in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 . These decreases in cash used in investing activities were offset by higher cash flows used in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 for (i) the acquisitions of property plant and equipment of $72,030 related to the continued expansion and development of Jefferson Terminal and CMQR and (ii) investment in notes receivable of $10,776, as well as a decrease in proceeds from sale of assets of $10,285 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to September 30, 2014 .
Net cash provided by financing activities was $ 603,016 and $ 438,128 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively, representing a $164,888 increase. Such increase was attributable to (i) the issuance of common shares net of issuance costs paid of $351,059, (ii) an increase in capital contributions from shareholders of $4,949, and (iii) a decrease in payment of deferred financing costs of $4,793 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months

66


ended September 30, 2014 . These increases in cash inflows were offset by (i) an increase in cash outflows for maintenance deposits, net of receipts of $5,820, (ii) a decrease in proceeds from debt, net of repayment of debt of $168,027, (iii) a decrease in capital contributions from non-controlling interests of $8,825, and (iv) an increase in cash dividends paid of $11,358 in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 .
Liquidity
The Company uses Funds Available for Distribution (“FAD”) in evaluating its ability to meet its stated dividend policy. FAD is not a financial measure in accordance with GAAP. The GAAP measure most directly comparable to FAD is net cash provided by operating activities. The Company believes FAD is a useful metric for investors and analysts for similar purposes.
The Company defines FAD as: net cash provided by operating activities plus principal collections on finance leases, proceeds from sale of assets, and return of capital distributions from unconsolidated entities, less required payments on debt obligations and capital distributions to non-controlling interest, and excluding changes in working capital.
Nine Months Ended

September 30, 2015
September 30, 2014

(in thousands)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
$
26,870

$
(27,786
)
Add: Principal Collections on Finance Leases
17,412

9,028

Add: Proceeds from sale of assets
9,253

19,538

Add: Return of Capital Distributions from Unconsolidated Entities
2,921

6,307

Less: Required Payments on Debt Obligations
(19,764
)
(26,886
)
Less: Capital Distributions to Non-Controlling Interest
(309
)
(422
)
Exclude: Changes in Working Capital
1,632

39,958

Funds Available for Distribution (FAD)
$
38,015

$
19,737

Limitations
FAD is subject to a number of limitations and assumptions and there can be no assurance that the Company will generate FAD sufficient to meet its intended dividends. FAD has material limitations as a liquidity measure of the Company because such measure excludes items that are required elements of the Company’s net cash provided by operating activities as described below. FAD should not be considered in isolation nor as a substitute for analysis of the Company’s results of operations under GAAP and it is not the only metric that should be considered when evaluating the Company’s ability to meet its stated dividend policy. Specifically:
•
FAD does not include equity capital raised, proceeds from any debt issuance or future equity offering, historical cash and cash equivalents and expected investments in the Company’s operations.
•
FAD does not give pro forma effect to prior acquisitions, certain of which cannot be quantified.
•
While FAD reflects the cash inflows from sale of certain assets, FAD does not reflect the cash outflows to acquire assets as the Company relies on alternative sources of liquidity to fund such purchases.
•
FAD does not reflect expenditures related to capital expenditures, acquisitions and other investments as the Company has multiple sources of liquidity and intends to fund these expenditures with future incurrences of indebtedness, additional capital contributions and/or future issuances of equity.
•
FAD does not reflect any maintenance capital expenditures necessary to maintain the same level of cash generation from our capital investments.
•
FAD does not reflect changes in working capital balances as management believes that changes in working capital are primarily driven by short term timing differences which are not meaningful to the Company’s distribution decisions.
•
Management has significant discretion to make distributions and the Company is not bound by any contractual provision that requires it to use cash for distributions.
If such factors were included in FAD, there can be no assurance that the results would be consistent with the Company’s presentation of FAD.


67


Debt Obligations
As of December 31, 2014, Series 2010 Bonds purchased by the Company were deemed to be owned by the Company,
and were classified as assets, Tendered Bonds, in the Consolidated Balance Sheet with an equal corresponding amount
as Debt. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Jefferson County Industrial Development Corporation, the Company, and Amegy Bank as the related trustee, agreed to extinguish and cancel the Series 2010 Bonds. Accordingly, the Series 2010 Bonds are no longer reported within Tendered Bonds or Debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2015.
Additional information regarding our debt agreements is disclosed in our Amendment No. 7 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 14, 2015.

Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our future obligations, by period due, as of September 30, 2015 , under our various contractual obligations and commitments. We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2015 .
Payments Due by Period (in thousands)
Total
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
Container Loan #1
$
36,581

$
1,820

$
7,279

$
27,482

$
—

$
—

$
—

Container Loan #2
11,702

364

7,371

452

3,515

—

—

Note payable to non-controlling interest
2,352

168

403

403

403

403

572

FTAI Pride Credit Agreement
68,750

1,562

6,250

6,250

6,250

48,438

—

CMQR Credit Agreement
9,284

—

—

9,284

—

—

—

Jefferson Terminal Credit Agreement
99,000

250

2,000

5,000

91,750

—

—

Jefferson Bonds Payable
45,510

—

1,320

1,425

1,545

1,670

39,550

Total principal payments on loans and bonds payable
$
273,179

$
4,164

$
24,623

$
50,296

$
103,463

$
50,511

$
40,122

Total estimated interest payments (1)
78,760

6,079

18,304

16,965

7,550

5,073

24,789

Operating lease obligations
72,755

1,674

6,603

5,864

5,308

4,867

48,439

Capital lease obligations
117

6

25

25

25

25

11

Total contractual obligations
$
424,811

$
11,923

$
49,555

$
73,150

$
116,346

$
60,476

$
113,361

______________________________
(1) Estimated interest payments based on interest rates as of September 30, 2015 .
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
There were no material changes in our critical accounting policies as disclosed in Amendment No. 7 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2015.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please see note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this filing for recent accounting pronouncements.
Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of changes in value of a financial instrument, caused by fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in our results of operations and cash flows. We are exposed to the market risks described below.

68


Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in the level of interest rates and the spread between different interest rates. Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including the U.S. government’s monetary and tax policies, global economic factors and other factors beyond our control. We are exposed to changes in the level of interest rates and to changes in the relationship or spread between interest rates. Our primary interest rate exposure relates to our term loan arrangements.
Our borrowing agreements generally require payments based on a variable interest rate index, such as LIBOR. Therefore, to the extent our borrowing costs are not fixed, increases in interest rates may reduce our net income by increasing the cost of our debt without any corresponding increase in rents or cash flow from our finance leases. We manage our exposure to interest rate movements through the use of interest rate derivatives (interest rate swaps and caps). As a result, when market rates of interest change, there is generally not a material impact on our interest expense, future earnings or cash flows.
The following discussion about the potential effects of changes in interest rates is based on a sensitivity analysis, which models the effects of hypothetical interest rate shifts on our financial condition and results of operations. Although we believe a sensitivity analysis provides the most meaningful analysis permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC, it is constrained by several factors, including the necessity to conduct the analysis based on a single point in time and by the inability to include the extraordinarily complex market reactions that normally would arise from the market shifts modeled. Although the following results of a sensitivity analysis for changes in interest rates may have some limited use as a benchmark, they should not be viewed as a forecast. This forward-looking disclosure also is selective in nature and addresses only the potential interest expense impacts on our financial instruments and, in particular, does not address the mark-to-market impact on our interest rate derivatives. It also does not include a variety of other potential factors that could affect our business as a result of changes in interest rates.
As of September 30, 2015 , assuming we do not hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations related to our outstanding floating rate debt, a hypothetical 100-basis point increase/decrease in our variable interest rate on our borrowings would result in an interest expense increase/(decrease) of approximately $2.2 million and $(2.2) million, respectively, over the next twelve months before the impact of interest rate derivatives.
Through the use of an interest rate swap, we have reduced our exposure to interest rate changes with respect to 70% of the outstanding principal balance of Container Loan #1. Through the use of an interest rate cap, we have reduced our exposure to interest rate changes with respect to 50% of the outstanding principal balance of that portion of Container Loan #2 attributable to equipment which is subject to direct finance leases having a five year term (representing a notional amount of approximately $2.5 million at September 30, 2015 ).
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Our functional currency is U.S. dollars. All of our leasing arrangements are denominated in U.S. dollars. Currently, the majority of freight rail revenue is also denominated in U.S. dollars, but a portion is denominated in Canadian dollars. Although foreign exchange risk could arise from our operations in multiple jurisdictions, we do not have significant exposure to foreign currency risk as our leasing arrangements are denominated in U.S. dollars. All of our purchase agreements are negotiated in U.S. dollars, and we currently receive the majority of revenue in U.S. dollars. We pay substantially all of our expenses in U.S. dollars; however we pay some expenses in Canadian dollars. Because we currently receive the majority of our revenues in U.S. dollars and pay substantially all of our expenses in U.S. dollars, we do not expect a change in foreign exchange rates would have a significant impact on our results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4.    Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of and for the period covered by this report. In addition, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during its most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

69


Item 1.         Legal Proceedings
We may be involved in litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. Although we will be unable to predict with certainty the eventual outcome of any litigation, in the opinion of management, our legal proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 1A.         Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following risks and other information in this Form 10-Q in evaluating us and our common stock. Any of the following risks, as well as additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition. The risk factors generally have been separated into the following groups: risks related to our business, risks related to our Manager, risks related to taxation and risks related to our common shares. However, these categories do overlap and should not be considered exclusive.
Risks Related to Our Business
Uncertainty relating to macroeconomic conditions may reduce the demand for our assets, result in non-performance of contracts by our lessees or charterers, limit our ability to obtain additional capital to finance new investments, or have other unforeseen negative effects.
Uncertainty and negative trends in general economic conditions in the United States and abroad, including significant tightening of credit markets and commodity price volatility, historically have created difficult operating environments for owners and operators in the transportation industry. Many factors, including factors that are beyond our control, may impact our operating results or financial condition and/or affect the lessees and charterers that form our customer base. For some years, the world has experienced weakened economic conditions and volatility following adverse changes in global capital markets. More recently, excess supply in oil and gas markets has put significant downward pressure on prices for these commodities, and may affect demand for assets used in production, refining and transportation of oil and gas. In particular, the significant decline in oil prices during 2015 has resulted in lower exploration and production budgets worldwide, with industry experts predicting that exploration and production spending will decrease by approximately 25% in 2015 (as compared to 2014). These conditions have resulted in significant contraction, de-leveraging and reduced liquidity in the credit markets. A number of governments have implemented, or are considering implementing, a broad variety of governmental actions or new regulations for the financial markets. In addition, limitations on the availability of capital, higher costs of capital for financing expenditures or the desire to preserve liquidity, may cause our current or prospective customers to make reductions in future capital budgets and spending.
Further, demand for our assets is related to passenger and cargo traffic growth, which in turn is dependent on general business and economic conditions. We cannot assure you that the recent global economic downturn will not continue or worsen, which could have an adverse impact on passenger and cargo traffic levels and consequently our lessees’ and charterers’ business, which may in turn result in a significant reduction in revenues, earnings and cash flows, difficulties accessing capital and a deterioration in the value of our assets. We may also become exposed to increased credit risk from our customers and third parties who have obligations to us, which could result in increased non-performance of contracts by our lessees or charterers and adversely impact our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The industries in which we operate have experienced periods of oversupply during which lease rates and asset values have declined, particularly during the recent economic downturn, and any future oversupply could materially adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.
The oversupply of a specific asset is likely to depress the lease or charter rates for and the value of that type of asset and result in decreased utilization of our assets, and the industries in which we operate have experienced periods of oversupply during which rates and asset values have declined, particularly during the recent economic downturn. Factors that could lead to such oversupply include, without limitation:
•
general demand for the type of assets that we purchase;
•
general macroeconomic conditions, including market prices for commodities that our assets may serve;
•
geopolitical events, including war, prolonged armed conflict and acts of terrorism;
•
outbreaks of communicable diseases and natural disasters;
•
governmental regulation;
•
interest rates;

70


•
the availability of credit;
•
restructurings and bankruptcies of companies in the industries in which we operate, including our customers;
•
manufacturer production levels and technological innovation;
•
manufacturers merging or exiting the industry or ceasing to produce certain asset types;
•
retirement and obsolescence of the assets that we own;
•
our railroad infrastructure may be damaged, including by flooding and railroad derailments;
•
increases in supply levels of assets in the market due to the sale or merging of operating lessors; and
•
reintroduction of previously unused or dormant assets into the industries in which we operate.
These and other related factors are generally outside of our control and could lead to persistence of, or increase in, the oversupply of the types of assets that we acquire or decreased utilization of our assets, either of which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow. In addition, lessees may redeliver our assets to locations where there is oversupply, which may lead to additional repositioning costs for us if we move them to areas with higher demand. Positioning expenses vary depending on geographic location, distance, freight rates and other factors, and may not be fully covered by drop-off charges collected from the last lessees of the equipment or pick-up charges paid by the new lessees. Positioning expenses can be significant if a large portion of our assets are returned to locations with weak demand, which could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
There can be no assurance that any target returns will be achieved.
Our target returns for assets are targets only and are not forecasts of future profits. We develop target returns based on our Manager’s assessment of appropriate expectations for returns on assets and the ability of our Manager to enhance the return generated by those assets through active management. There can be no assurance that these assessments and expectations will be achieved and failure to achieve any or all of them may materially adversely impact our ability to achieve any target return with respect to any or all of our assets.
In addition, our target returns are based on estimates and assumptions regarding a number of other factors, including, without limitation, holding periods, the absence of material adverse events affecting specific investments (which could include, without limitation, natural disasters, terrorism, social unrest or civil disturbances), general and local economic and market conditions, changes in law, taxation, regulation or governmental policies and changes in the political approach to transportation investment, either generally or in specific countries in which we may invest or seek to invest. Many of these factors, as well as the other risks described elsewhere in this report, are beyond our control and all could adversely affect our ability to achieve a target return with respect to an asset. Further, target returns are targets for the return generated by specific assets and not by us. Numerous factors could prevent us from achieving similar returns, notwithstanding the performance of individual assets, including, without limitation, taxation and fees payable by us or our operating subsidiaries, including fees and incentive allocation payable to our Manager.
There can be no assurance that the returns generated by any of our assets will meet our target returns, or any other level of return, or that we will achieve or successfully implement our asset acquisition objectives, and failure to achieve the target return in respect of any of our assets could, among other things, have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Further, even if the returns generated by individual assets meet target returns, there can be no assurance that the returns generated by other existing or future assets would do so, and the historical performance of the assets in our existing portfolio should not be considered as indicative of future results with respect to any assets.
Contractual defaults may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows by decreasing revenues and increasing storage, positioning, collection, recovery and lost equipment expenses.
The success of our business depends in large part on the success of the operators in the sectors in which we participate. Cash flows from our assets are substantially impacted by our ability to collect compensation and other amounts to be paid in respect of such assets from the customers with which we enter into leases, charters or other contractual arrangements. Inherent in the nature of the leases, charters and other arrangements for the use of such assets is the risk that we may not receive, or may experience delay in realizing, such amounts to be paid. While we target the entry into contracts with credit-worthy counterparties, no assurance can be given that such counterparties will perform their obligations during the term of the leases, charters or other contractual arrangements. In addition, when counterparties default, we may fail to recover all of our assets, and the assets we do recover may be returned in damaged condition or to locations where we will not be able to efficiently lease, charter or sell them. In most cases, we maintain, or require our lessees to maintain, certain insurances to cover the risk of damages or loss of our assets. However, these insurance policies may not be sufficient to protect us against a loss.

71


Depending on the specific sector, the risk of contractual defaults may be elevated due to excess capacity as a result of oversupply during the recent economic downturn. We lease assets to our customers pursuant to fixed-price contracts, and our customers then seek to utilize those assets to transport goods and provide services. If the price at which our customers receive for their transportation services decreases as a result of an oversupply in the marketplace, then our customers may be forced to reduce their prices in order to attract business (which may have an adverse effect on their ability to meet their contractual lease obligations to us), or may seek to renegotiate or terminate their contractual lease arrangements with us to pursue a lower-priced opportunity with another lessor, which may have a direct, adverse effect on us. See “-The industries in which we operate have experienced periods of oversupply during which lease rates and asset values have declined, particularly during the financial crisis, and any future oversupply could materially adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows”. Any default by a material customer would have a significant impact on our profitability at the time the customer defaulted, which could materially adversely affect our operating results and growth prospects. In addition, some of our counterparties may reside in jurisdictions with legal and regulatory regimes that make it difficult and costly to enforce such counterparties’ obligations.
We may not be able to renew or obtain new or favorable charters or leases, which could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operating leases are subject to greater residual risk than direct finance leases because we will own the assets at the expiration of an operating lease term and we may be unable to renew existing charters or leases at favorable rates, or at all, or sell the leased or chartered assets, and the residual value of the asset may be lower than anticipated. In addition, our ability to renew existing charters or leases or obtain new charters or leases will also depend on prevailing market conditions, and upon expiration of the contracts governing the leasing or charter of the applicable assets, we may be exposed to increased volatility in terms of rates and contract provisions. For example, in the fourth quarter of 2015 we are taking redelivery of a construction support vessel, the Pride, because its prior charter has expired and we do not currently have a replacement lessee under contract. Likewise, our customers may reduce their activity levels or seek to terminate or renegotiate their charters or leases with us. If we are not able to renew or obtain new charters or leases in direct continuation, or if new charters or leases are entered into at rates substantially below the existing rates or on terms otherwise less favorable compared to existing contractual terms, or if we are unable to sell assets for which we are unable to obtain new contracts or leases, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
If we acquire a high concentration of a particular type of asset, or concentrate our investments in a particular sector, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected by changes in market demand or problems specific to that asset or sector.
If we acquire a high concentration of a particular asset, or concentrate our investments in a particular sector, our business and financial results could be adversely affected by sector-specific or asset-specific factors. For example, if a particular sector experiences difficulties such as increased competition or oversupply, the operators we rely on as a lessor may be adversely affected and consequently our business and financial results may be similarly affected. If we acquire a high concentration of a particular asset and the market demand for a particular asset declines, it is redesigned or replaced by its manufacturer or it experiences design or technical problems, the value and rates relating to such asset may decline, and we may be unable to lease or charter such asset on favorable terms, if at all. Any decrease in the value and rates of our assets may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We operate in highly competitive markets.
The business of acquiring transportation and transportation-related infrastructure assets is highly competitive. Market competition for opportunities includes traditional transportation and infrastructure companies, commercial and investment banks, as well as a growing number of non-traditional participants, such as hedge funds, private equity funds and other private investors, including other affiliates of Fortress. Some of these competitors may have access to greater amounts of capital and/or to capital that may be committed for longer periods of time or may have different return thresholds than us, and thus these competitors may have certain advantages not shared by us. In addition, competitors may have incurred, or may in the future incur, leverage to finance their debt investments at levels or on terms more favorable than those available to us. Strong competition for investment opportunities could result in fewer such opportunities for us, as certain of these competitors have established and are establishing investment vehicles that target the same types of assets that we intend to purchase.
In addition, some of our competitors may have longer operating histories, greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than us, and consequently, may be able to compete more effectively in one or more of our target markets. We likely will not always be able to compete successfully with our competitors and competitive pressures or other factors may also result in significant price competition, particularly during industry downturns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Litigation to enforce our contracts and recover our assets has inherent uncertainties that are increased by the location of our assets in jurisdictions that have less developed legal systems.

72


While some of our contractual arrangements are governed by New York law and provide for the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in the state of New York, our ability to enforce our counterparties’ obligations under such contractual arrangements is subject to applicable laws in the jurisdiction in which enforcement is sought. While some of our existing assets are used in specific jurisdictions, transportation and transportation-related infrastructure assets by their nature generally move throughout multiple jurisdictions in the ordinary course of business. As a result, it is not possible to predict, with any degree of certainty, the jurisdictions in which enforcement proceedings may be commenced. Litigation and enforcement proceedings have inherent uncertainties in any jurisdiction and are expensive. These uncertainties are enhanced in countries that have less developed legal systems where the interpretation of laws and regulations is not consistent, may be influenced by factors other than legal merits and may be cumbersome, time-consuming and even more expensive. For example, repossession from defaulting lessees may be difficult and more expensive in jurisdictions whose laws do not confer the same security interests and rights to creditors and lessors as those in the United States and where the legal system is not as well developed. As a result, the remedies available and the relative success and expedience of collection and enforcement proceedings with respect to the our owned assets in various jurisdictions cannot be predicted. To the extent more of our business shifts to areas outside of the United States and Europe, such as China, it may become more difficult and expensive to enforce our rights and recover our assets.
Certain liens may arise on our assets.
Certain of our assets are currently subject to liens under separate financing arrangements entered into by two of our subsidiaries in connection with acquisitions of shipping containers. In the event of a default under such arrangements by the applicable subsidiary, the lenders thereunder would be permitted to take possession of or sell such assets. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources.” In addition, our currently owned assets and assets that we purchase in the future may be subject to other liens based on the industry practices relating to such assets. Until they are discharged, these liens could impair our ability to repossess, re-lease or sell our assets, and to the extent our lessees or charterers do not comply with their obligations to discharge any liens on the applicable assets, we may find it necessary to pay the claims secured by such liens in order to repossess such assets. Such payments could materially adversely affect our operating results and growth prospects.
The values of the assets that we purchase may fluctuate due to various factors.
The fair market values of our assets may decrease or increase depending on a number of factors, including the prevailing level of charter or lease rates from time to time, general economic and market conditions affecting our target markets, type and age of assets, supply and demand for assets, competition, new governmental or other regulations and technological advances, all of which could impact our profitability and our ability to lease, charter or sell such assets. In addition, our assets depreciate as they age and may generate lower revenues and cash flows. We must be able to replace such older, depreciated assets with newer assets, or our ability to maintain or increase our revenues and cash flows will decline. In addition, if we dispose of an asset for a price that is less than the depreciated book value of the asset on our balance sheet or if we determine that an asset’s value has been impaired, we will recognize a related charge in our consolidated statement of operations and such charge could be material.
Our use of joint ventures or partnerships, and our Manager’s outsourcing of certain functions, may present unforeseen obstacles or costs.
We have acquired and may in the future acquire interests in certain assets in cooperation with third-party partners or co-investors through jointly-owned acquisition vehicles, joint ventures or other structures. In these co-investment situations, our ability to control the management of such assets depends upon the nature and terms of the joint arrangements with such partners and our relative ownership stake in the asset, each of which will be determined by negotiation at the time of the investment and the determination of which is subject to the discretion of our Manager. Depending on our Manager’s perception of the relative risks and rewards of a particular asset, our Manager may elect to acquire interests in structures that afford relatively little or no operational and/or management control to us. Such arrangements present risks not present with wholly-owned assets, such as the possibility that a co-investor becomes bankrupt, develops business interests or goals that conflict with our interests and goals in respect of the assets, all of which could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, our Manager expects to utilize third party contractors to perform services and functions related to the operation and leasing of our assets. These functions may include billing, collections, recovery and asset monitoring. Because we and our Manager do not directly control these third parties, there can be no assurance that the services they provide will be delivered at a level commensurate with our expectations, or at all. The failure of any such third party contractors to perform in accordance with our expectations could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are subject to the risks and costs of obsolescence of our assets.

73


Technological and other improvements expose us to the risk that certain of our assets may become technologically or commercially obsolete. For example, in our Aviation Leasing segment, as manufacturers introduce technological innovations and new types of aircraft, some of our assets could become less desirable to potential lessees. Such technological innovations may increase the rate of obsolescence of existing aircraft faster than currently anticipated by us. In addition, the imposition of increased regulation regarding stringent noise or emissions restrictions may make some of our aircraft less desirable and less valuable in the marketplace. In our Offshore Energy segment, development and construction of new, sophisticated, high-specification assets could cause our assets to become less desirable to potential charterers, and insurance rates may also increase with the age of a vessel, making older vessels less desirable to potential charterers. Any of these risks may adversely affect our ability to lease, charter or sell our assets on favorable terms, if at all, which could materially adversely affect our operating results and growth prospects.
The North American rail sector is a highly regulated industry and increased costs of compliance with, or liability for violation of, existing or future laws, regulations and other requirements could significantly increase our costs of doing business, thereby adversely affecting our profitability.
The rail sector is subject to extensive laws, regulations and other requirements including, but not limited to, those relating to the environment, safety, rates and charges, service obligations, employment, labor, immigration, minimum wages and overtime pay, health care and benefits, working conditions, public accessibility and other requirements. These laws and regulations are enforced by US and Canadian federal agencies including the US and Canadian Environmental Protection Agencies, the US and Canadian Departments of Transportation (USDOT or Transport Canada), the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA or Canadian provincial equivalents), the US Federal Railroad Administration, or FRA, and the U.S. Surface Transportation Board, or STB, as well as numerous other state, provincial, local and federal agencies. Ongoing compliance with, or a violation of, these laws, regulations and other requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We believe that our rail operations are in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations. However, these laws and regulations, and the interpretation or enforcement thereof, are subject to frequent change and varying interpretation by regulatory authorities, and we are unable to predict the ongoing cost to us of complying with these laws and regulations or the future impact of these laws and regulations on our operations. In addition, from time to time we are subject to inspections and investigations by various regulators. In April 2015, we received a notice from Transport Canada that it is investigating a possible violation under the Railway Safety Act related to inspections of our operations conducted in March 2015. We believe we are in compliance with applicable requirements, and, while we cannot predict with certainty the outcome of the investigation, we do not believe it will have a material adverse effect on the Company. Violation of environmental or other laws, regulations and permits can result in the imposition of significant administrative, civil and criminal penalties, injunctions and construction bans or delays.
Legislation passed by the US Congress or Canadian Parliament or new regulations issued by federal agencies can significantly affect the revenues, costs and profitability of our business. For instance, in December 2009, a proposed bill called the “Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2009” was introduced in the Senate but not advanced. In addition, more recently proposed bills such as the “Rail Shipper Fairness Act of 2015,” if adopted, could increase government involvement in railroad pricing, service and operations and significantly change the federal regulatory framework of the railroad industry. Several of the changes under consideration could have a significant negative impact on FTAI’s ability to determine prices for rail services, meet service standards and could force a reduction in capital spending. Statutes imposing price constraints or affecting rail-to-rail competition could adversely affect FTAI’s profitability.
Under various US and Canadian federal, state, provincial and local environmental requirements, as the owner or operator of terminals or other facilities, we may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of contamination at or from our existing locations, whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence of such contamination. The failure to timely report and properly remediate contamination may subject us to liability to third parties and may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent our property or to borrow money using our property as collateral. Additionally, we may be liable for the costs of remediating third-party sites where hazardous substances from our operations have been transported for treatment or disposal, regardless of whether we own or operate that site. In the future, we may incur substantial expenditures for investigation or remediation of contamination that has not yet been discovered at our current or former locations or locations that we may acquire.
A discharge of hydrocarbons or hazardous substances into the environment associated with operating our rail assets could subject us to substantial expense, including the cost to recover the materials spilled, restore the affected natural resources, pay fines and penalties, and natural resource damages and claims made by employees, neighboring landowners, government authorities and other third parties, including for personal injury and property damage. We may experience future catastrophic sudden or gradual releases into the environment from our facilities or discover historical releases that were previously unidentified or not assessed. Although our inspection and testing programs are designed to prevent, detect and address any such

74


releases promptly, the liabilities incurred due to any future releases into the environment from our assets, have the potential to substantially affect our business. Such events could also subject us to media and public scrutiny that could have a negative effect on our operations and also on the value of our common shares.
Our business could be adversely affected if service on the railroads is interrupted or if more stringent regulations are adopted regarding railcar design or the transportation of crude oil by rail.
As a result of hydraulic fracturing and other improvements in extraction technologies, there has been a substantial increase in the volume of crude oil and liquid hydrocarbons produced and transported in North America, and a geographic shift in that production versus historical production. The increase in volume and shift in geography has resulted in a growing percentage of crude oil being transported by rail. High-profile accidents involving crude-oil-carrying trains in Quebec, North Dakota and Virginia, and more recently in West Virginia and Illinois, have raised concerns about the environmental and safety risks associated with crude oil transport by rail and the associated risks arising from railcar design.
In May 2015, the DOT issued new production standards and operational controls for rail tank cars used in “High-Hazard Flammable Trains” (i.e. trains carrying commodities such as ethanol, crude oil and other flammable liquids).  Similar standards have been adopted in Canada. The new standard applies for all cars manufactured after October 1, 2015, and existing tank cars must be retrofitted within the next three to eight years.  The applicable operational controls include reduced speed restrictions, and maximum lengths on trains carrying these materials.  Retrofitting our tank cars will be required under these new standards.  While we may be able to pass some of these costs on to our customers, there may be additional costs that we cannot pass on to them. We continue to monitor the railcar regulatory landscape and remain in close contact with railcar suppliers and other industry stakeholders to stay informed of railcar regulation rulemaking developments.  It is unclear how these regulations will impact the crude-by-rail industry, and any such impact would depend on a number of factors that are outside of our control.  If, for example, overall volume of crude-by-rail decreases, or if we do not have access to a sufficient number of compliant cars to transport required volumes under our existing contracts, our operations may be negatively affected.  This may lead to a decrease in revenues and other consequences.
The adoption of additional federal, state, provincial or local laws or regulations, including any voluntary measures by the rail industry regarding railcar design or crude oil and liquid hydrocarbon rail transport activities, or efforts by local communities to restrict or limit rail traffic involving crude oil, could affect our business by increasing compliance costs and decreasing demand for our services, which could adversely affect our financial position and cash flows. Moreover, any disruptions in the operations of railroads, including those due to shortages of railcars, weather-related problems, flooding, drought, accidents, mechanical difficulties, strikes, lockouts or bottlenecks, could adversely impact our customers’ ability to move their product and, as a result, could affect our business.
Our assets are exposed to unplanned interruptions caused by catastrophic events outside of our control which may disrupt our business and cause damage or losses that may not be adequately covered by insurance.
The operations of transportation and infrastructure projects are exposed to unplanned interruptions caused by significant catastrophic events, such as cyclones, earthquakes, landslides, floods, explosions, fires, major plant breakdowns, pipeline or electricity line ruptures or other disasters. Operational disruption, as well as supply disruption, could adversely impact the cash flows available from these assets. For example, the 2011 earthquake in Japan and the related nuclear reactor accidents have caused the disruption of cargo shipping lines by closing off certain ports and requiring additional precautionary and safety measures at other ports around the world. In addition, the cost of repairing or replacing damaged assets could be considerable. Repeated or prolonged interruption may result in temporary or permanent loss of customers, substantial litigation or penalties for regulatory or contractual non-compliance, and any loss from such events may not be recoverable under relevant insurance policies. Although we believe that we are adequately insured against these types of events, either indirectly through our lessees or charterers or through our own insurance policies, no assurance can be given that the occurrence of any such event will not materially adversely affect us. In addition, if a lessee or charterer is not obligated to maintain sufficient insurance, we may incur the costs of additional insurance coverage during the related lease or charter. We can give no assurance that such insurance will be available at commercially reasonable rates, if at all.
Our assets generally require routine maintenance, and we may be exposed to unforeseen maintenance costs.
We may be exposed to unforeseen maintenance costs for our assets associated with a lessee’s or charterer’s failure to properly maintain the asset. We enter into leases and charters with respect to some of our assets pursuant to which the lessees are primarily responsible for many obligations, which generally include complying with all governmental requirements applicable to the lessee or charterer, including operational, maintenance, government agency oversight, registration requirements and other applicable directives. Failure of a lessee or charterer to perform required maintenance during the term of a lease or charter could result in a decrease in value of an asset, an inability to re-lease or charter an asset at favorable rates, if at all, or a potential inability to utilize an asset. Maintenance failures would also likely require us to incur maintenance and modification costs upon the termination of the applicable lease or charter; such costs to restore the asset to an acceptable

75


condition prior to re-leasing, charter or sale could be substantial. Any failure by our lessees or charterers to meet their obligations to perform required scheduled maintenance or our inability to maintain our assets could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Some of our customers operate in highly regulated industries and changes in laws or regulations, including laws with respect to international trade, may adversely affect our ability to lease, charter or sell our assets.
Some of our customers operate in highly regulated industries such as aviation and offshore energy. A number of our contractual arrangements-for example, our leasing aircraft engines or offshore energy equipment to third-party operators-require the operator (our customer) to obtain specific governmental or regulatory licenses, consents or approvals. These include consents for certain payments under such arrangements and for the export, import or re-export of the related assets. Failure by our customers or, in certain circumstances, by us, to obtain certain licenses and approvals could negatively affect our ability to conduct our business. In addition, the shipment of goods, services and technology across international borders subjects the operation of our assets to international trade laws and regulations. Moreover, many countries, including the United States, control the export and re-export of certain goods, services and technology and impose related export recordkeeping and reporting obligations. Governments also may impose economic sanctions against certain countries, persons and other entities that may restrict or prohibit transactions involving such countries, persons and entities. If any such regulations or sanctions affect the asset operators that are our customers, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be materially adversely affected.
It is impossible to predict whether third parties will allege liability related to our purchase of the MM&A assets out of bankruptcy, including possible claims related to the July 6, 2013 train derailment near Lac-Mégantic, Quebec.
On July 6, 2013, prior to our ownership, a train carrying crude oil on the MM&A line derailed near Lac-Mégantic, Quebec which resulted in fires that claimed the lives of 47 individuals (the “Incident”). Approximately 2 million gallons of crude oil were either burned or released into the environment, including into the nearby Chaudière River. Prior to our acquisition of the MM&A assets in May and June 2014, we received written assurance from the Quebec Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment, Wildlife and Parks that it would take full responsibility for the environmental clean-up and that it would not hold CMQR liable for any environmental damages or costs relating to clean-up or restoration of the affected area as a result of the Incident. While we don’t anticipate any liability relating to the Incident, including liability for claims alleging personal injury, property damage or natural resource damages, there can be no assurance that such claims relating to the Incident will not arise in the future. No claims have been made or threatened against us as of June 30, 2015 and we do not anticipate any expenditures relating to environmental clean-up (including impacts to the Chaudière River) as a result of the Incident.
Certain of our assets are subject to purchase options held by the charterer or lessee of the asset which, if exercised, could reduce the size of our asset base and our future revenues.
We have granted purchase options to the charterers and lessees of certain of our assets. The market values of these assets may change from time to time depending on a number of factors, such as general economic and market conditions affecting the industries in which we operate, competition, cost of construction, governmental or other regulations, technological changes and prevailing levels of charter or lease rates from time to time. The purchase price under a purchase option may be less than the asset’s market value at the time the option may be exercised. In addition, we may not be able to obtain a replacement asset for the price at which the asset is sold. In such cases, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be materially adversely affected.
The profitability of our Offshore Energy segment may be impacted by the profitability of the offshore oil and gas industry generally, which is significantly affected by, among other things, volatile oil and gas prices.
Demand for assets in the Offshore Energy segment and our ability to secure charter contracts for our assets at favorable charter rates following expiry or termination of existing charters will depend, among other things, on the level of activity in the offshore oil and gas industry. The offshore oil and gas industry is cyclical and volatile, and demand for oil-service assets depends on, among other things, the level of development and activity in oil and gas exploration, as well as the identification and development of oil and gas reserves and production in offshore areas worldwide. The availability of high quality oil and gas prospects, exploration success, relative production costs, the stage of reservoir development, political concerns and regulatory requirements all affect the level of activity for charterers of oil-service vessels. Accordingly, oil and gas prices and market expectations of potential changes in these prices significantly affect the level of activity and demand for oil-service assets. Oil and gas prices can be extremely volatile (and have declined significantly in the last six months) and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, such as: worldwide demand for oil and gas; costs of exploring, developing, producing and delivering oil and gas; expectations regarding future energy prices; the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to set and maintain production levels and impact pricing; the level of production in non-OPEC countries; governmental regulations and policies regarding development of oil and gas reserves; local and international political,

76


economic and weather conditions; domestic and foreign tax policies; political and military conflicts in oil-producing and other countries; and the development and exploration of alternative fuels. Any reduction in the demand for our assets due to these or other factors could materially adversely affect our operating results and growth prospects.
Our Shipping Containers segment is affected by the lack of an international title registry for containers, which increases the risk of ownership disputes.
Although the Bureau International des Containers registers and allocates a unique four letter prefix to every container in accordance with International Standardization Organization (“ISO”) standard 6346 (Freight container coding, identification and marking) there is no internationally recognized system of recordation or filing to evidence our title to containers nor is there an internationally recognized system for filing security interest in containers. While this has not historically had a material impact on our intermodal assets, the lack of a title recordation system with respect to containers could result in disputes with lessees, end-users, or third parties, such as creditors of end-users, who may improperly claim ownership of the containers, especially in countries with less developed legal systems.
Our international operations involve additional risks, which could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We and our customers operate in various regions throughout the world. As a result, we may, directly or indirectly, be exposed to political and other uncertainties, including risks of:
•
terrorist acts, armed hostilities, war and civil disturbances;
•
acts of piracy;
•
significant governmental influence over many aspects of local economies;
•
seizure, nationalization or expropriation of property or equipment;
•
repudiation, nullification, modification or renegotiation of contracts;
•
limitations on insurance coverage, such as war risk coverage, in certain areas;
•
political unrest;
•
foreign and U.S. monetary policy and foreign currency fluctuations and devaluations;
•
the inability to repatriate income or capital;
•
complications associated with repairing and replacing equipment in remote locations;
•
import-export quotas, wage and price controls, imposition of trade barriers;
•
U.S. and foreign sanctions or trade embargoes;
•
restrictions on the transfer of funds into or out of countries in which we operate;
•
compliance with U.S. Treasury sanctions regulations restricting doing business with certain nations or specially designated nationals;
•
regulatory or financial requirements to comply with foreign bureaucratic actions;
•
compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations;
•
changing taxation policies, including confiscatory taxation;
•
other forms of government regulation and economic conditions that are beyond our control; and
•
governmental corruption.
Any of these or other risks could adversely impact our customers’ international operations which could materially adversely impact our operating results and growth opportunities.
We may make acquisitions in emerging markets throughout the world, and investments in emerging markets are subject to greater risks than developed markets and could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
To the extent that we acquire assets in emerging markets-which we may do throughout the world-additional risks may be encountered that could adversely affect our business. Emerging market countries have less developed economies and infrastructure and are often more vulnerable to economic and geopolitical challenges and may experience significant fluctuations in gross domestic product, interest rates and currency exchange rates, as well as civil disturbances, government

77


instability, nationalization and expropriation of private assets and the imposition of taxes or other charges by government authorities. In addition, the currencies in which investments are denominated may be unstable, may be subject to significant depreciation and may not be freely convertible or may be subject to the imposition of other monetary or fiscal controls and restrictions.
Emerging markets are still in relatively early stages of their development and accordingly may not be highly or efficiently regulated. Moreover, emerging markets tend to be shallower and less liquid than more established markets which may adversely affect our ability to realize profits from our assets in emerging markets when we desire to do so or receive what we perceive to be their fair value in the event of a realization. In some cases, a market for realizing profits from an investment may not exist locally. In addition, issuers based in emerging markets are not generally subject to uniform accounting and financial reporting standards, practices and requirements comparable to those applicable to issuers based in more developed countries, thereby potentially increasing the risk of fraud and other deceptive practices. Settlement of transactions may be subject to greater delay and administrative uncertainties than in developed markets and less complete and reliable financial and other information may be available to investors in emerging markets than in developed markets. In addition, economic instability in emerging markets could adversely affect the value of our assets subject to leases or charters in such countries, or the ability of our lessees or charters, which operate in these markets, to meet their contractual obligations. As a result, lessees or charterers that operate in emerging market countries may be more likely to default under their contractual obligations than those that operate in developed countries. Liquidity and volatility limitations in these markets may also adversely affect our ability to dispose of our assets at the best price available or in a timely manner.
As we have and may continue to acquire assets located in emerging markets throughout the world, we may be exposed to any one or a combination of these risks, which could adversely affect our operating results.
We are actively evaluating acquisitions of assets and operating companies in other transportation and infrastructure sectors which could result in additional risks and uncertainties for our business and unexpected regulatory compliance costs.
While our existing portfolio consists of assets in the aviation, energy, intermodal transport and rail sectors, we are actively evaluating acquisitions of assets and operating companies in other sectors of the transportation and transportation-related infrastructure and equipment markets and we plan to be flexible as other attractive opportunities arise over time. To the extent we make acquisitions in other sectors, we will face numerous risks and uncertainties, including risks associated with the required investment of capital and other resources and with combining or integrating operational and management systems and controls. Entry into certain lines of business may subject us to new laws and regulations and may lead to increased litigation and regulatory risk. Many types of transportation assets, including certain rail, airport and seaport assets, are subject to registration requirements by U.S. governmental agencies, as well as foreign governments if such assets are to be used outside of the United States. Failing to register the assets, or losing such registration, could result in substantial penalties, forced liquidation of the assets and/or the inability to operate and, if applicable, lease the assets. We may need to incur significant costs to comply with the laws and regulations applicable to any such new acquisition. The failure to comply with these laws and regulations could cause us to incur significant costs, fines or penalties or require the assets to be removed from service for a period of time resulting in reduced income from these assets. In addition, if our acquisitions in other sectors produce insufficient revenues, or produce investment losses, or if we are unable to efficiently manage our expanded operations, our results of operations will be adversely affected, and our reputation and business may be harmed.
We may acquire operating businesses, including businesses whose operations are not fully matured and stabilized. These businesses may be subject to significant operating and development risks, including increased competition, cost overruns and delays, and difficulties in obtaining approvals or financing. These factors could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
We have acquired, and may in the future acquire, operating businesses including businesses whose operations are not fully matured and stabilized (such as Jefferson Terminal). While we have deep experience in the construction and operation of these companies, we are nevertheless subject to significant risks and contingencies of an operating business, and these risks are greater where the operations of such businesses are not fully matured and stabilized. Key factors that may affect our operating businesses include, but are not limited to:
•
competition from market participants;
•
general economic and/or industry trends, including pricing for the products or services offered by our operating businesses;
•
the issuance and/or continued availability of necessary permits, licenses, approvals and agreements from governmental agencies and third parties as are required to construct and operate such businesses;
•
changes or deficiencies in the design or construction of development projects;

78


•
unforeseen engineering, environmental or geological problems;
•
potential increases in construction and operating costs due to changes in the cost and availability of fuel, power, materials and supplies;
•
the availability and cost of skilled labor and equipment;
•
our ability to enter into additional satisfactory agreements with contractors and to maintain good relationships with these contractors in order to construct development projects within our expected cost parameters and time frame, and the ability of those contractors to perform their obligations under the contracts and to maintain their creditworthiness;
•
potential liability for injury or casualty losses which are not covered by insurance;
•
potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, environmental groups, local or other groups which may delay or prevent development activities;
•
local and economic conditions;
•
changes in legal requirements; and
•
force majeure events, including catastrophes and adverse weather conditions.
Any of these factors could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Terrorist attacks could negatively impact our operations and our profitability and may expose us to liability and reputational damage.
Terrorist attacks may negatively affect our operations. Such attacks have contributed to economic instability in the United States and elsewhere, and further acts of terrorism, violence or war could similarly affect world trade and the industries in which we and our customers operate. In addition, terrorist attacks or hostilities may directly impact airports or aircraft, ports where our containers and vessels travel, or our physical facilities or those of our customers. In addition, it is also possible that our assets could be involved in a terrorist attack. The consequences of any terrorist attacks or hostilities are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Although our lease and charter agreements generally require the counterparties to indemnify us against all damages arising out of the use of our assets, and we carry insurance to potentially offset any costs in the event that our customer indemnifications prove to be insufficient, our insurance does not cover certain types of terrorist attacks, and we may not be fully protected from liability or the reputational damage that could arise from a terrorist attack which utilizes our assets.
Because we are a recently formed company with a limited operating history, our historical financial and operating data may not be representative of our future results.
We are a recently formed limited liability company with a limited operating history. Our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows reflected in our consolidated financial statements may not be indicative of the results we would have achieved if we were a public company or results that may be achieved in future periods. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient income to pay our operating expenses and make satisfactory distributions to our shareholders, or any distributions at all. Further, we only make acquisitions identified by our Manager. As a result of this concentration of assets, our financial performance depends on the performance of our Manager in identifying target assets, the availability of opportunities falling within our asset acquisition strategy and the performance of those underlying assets.
Future changes in accounting rules could significantly impact how both we and our customers account for our leases.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. In May 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a revised exposure draft, “Leases” (the “Lease ED”), which would replace the existing guidance in the Accounting Standards Codification 840 (“ASC 840”), Leases. Pursuant to the Lease ED, leases would be classified as either leases of property or leases of assets other than property. Leases of property will continue to use operating lease accounting. Leases of assets other than property would use the receivable residual approach. Under the receivable residual approach, a lease receivable would be recognized for the lessor’s right to receive lease payments, a portion of the carrying amount of the underlying asset would be allocated between the right of use granted to the lessee and the lessor’s residual value and profit or loss would only be recognized at commencement if it is reasonably assured. It is anticipated that the final standard would have an effective date no earlier than 2017. When and if the proposed guidance becomes effective, it may have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Our leases and charters require payments in U.S. dollars, but many of our customers operate in other currencies; if foreign currencies devalue against the U.S. dollar, our lessees or charterers may be unable to meet their payment obligations to us in a timely manner.

79


Our current leases and charters require that payments be made in U.S. dollars. If the currency that our lessees or charterers typically use in operating their businesses devalues against the U.S. dollar, our lessees or charterers could encounter difficulties in making payments to us in U.S. dollars. Furthermore, many foreign countries have currency and exchange laws regulating international payments that may impede or prevent payments from being paid to us in U.S. dollars. Future leases or charters may provide for payments to be made in euros or other foreign currencies. Any change in the currency exchange rate that reduces the amount of U.S. dollars obtained by us upon conversion of future lease payments denominated in euros or other foreign currencies, may, if not appropriately hedged by us, have a material adverse effect on us and increase the volatility of our earnings.
Our inability to obtain sufficient capital would constrain our ability to grow our portfolio and to increase our revenues.
Our business is capital intensive, and we have used and may continue to employ leverage to finance our operations. Accordingly, our ability to successfully execute our business strategy and maintain our operations depends on the availability and cost of debt and equity capital. Additionally, our ability to borrow against our assets is dependent, in part, on the appraised value of such assets. If the appraised value of such assets declines, we may be required to reduce the principal outstanding under our debt facilities or otherwise be unable to incur new borrowings.
We can give no assurance that the capital we need will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. Our inability to obtain sufficient capital, or to renew or expand our credit facilities, could result in increased funding costs and would limit our ability to:
•
meet the terms and maturities of our existing and future debt facilities;
•
purchase new assets or refinance existing assets;
•
fund our working capital needs and maintain adequate liquidity; and
•
finance other growth initiatives.
In addition, we conduct our operations so that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”). As such, certain forms of financing such as finance leases may not be available to us. Please see “- If we are deemed an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.”
The effects of various environmental regulations may negatively affect the industries in which we operate which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants to air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites and noise and emission levels. Under some environmental laws in the United States and certain other countries, strict liability may be imposed on the owners or operators of assets, which could render us liable for environmental and natural resource damages without regard to negligence or fault on our part. We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and third-party claims for property or natural resource damage and personal injury, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws and regulations in connection with our or our lessee’s or charterer’s current or historical operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. While we typically maintain liability insurance coverage and typically require our lessees to provide us with indemnity against certain losses, the insurance coverage is subject to large deductibles, limits on maximum coverage and significant exclusions and may not be sufficient or available to protect against any or all liabilities and such indemnities may not cover or be sufficient to protect us against losses arising from environmental damage. In addition, changes to environmental standards or regulations in the industries in which we operate could limit the economic life of the assets we acquire or reduce their value, and also require us to make significant additional investments in order to maintain compliance, which would negatively impact our cash flows and results of operations.
If we are deemed an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We conduct our operations so that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the

80


issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Excluded from the term “investment securities,” among other things, are U.S. government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company for certain privately-offered investment vehicles set forth in Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.
We are a holding company that is not an investment company because we are engaged in the business of holding securities of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, which are engaged in transportation and related businesses which lease assets pursuant to operating leases and finance leases. The Investment Company Act may limit our and our subsidiaries’ ability to enter into financing leases and engage in other types of financial activity because less than 40% of the value of our and our subsidiaries’ total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis can consist of “investment securities.”
If we or any of our subsidiaries were required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, the registered entity would become subject to substantial regulation that would significantly change our operations, and we would not be able to conduct our business as described in this report. We have not obtained a formal determination from the SEC as to our status under the Investment Company Act and, consequently, any violation of the Investment Company Act would subject us to material adverse consequences.
Risks Related to Our Manager
We are dependent on our Manager and other key personnel at Fortress and may not find suitable replacements if our Manager terminates the Management Agreement or if other key personnel depart.
Our officers and other individuals who perform services for us are employees of our Manager. We are completely reliant on our Manager, which has significant discretion as to the implementation of our operating policies and strategies, to conduct our business. We are subject to the risk that our Manager will terminate the Management Agreement and that we will not be able to find a suitable replacement for our Manager in a timely manner, at a reasonable cost, or at all. Furthermore, we are dependent on the services of certain key employees of our Manager and certain key employees of Fortress whose compensation is partially or entirely dependent upon the amount of management fees earned by our Manager or the incentive allocations distributed to the General Partner and whose continued service is not guaranteed, and the loss of such personnel or services could materially adversely affect our operations. We do not have key man insurance for any of the personnel of the Manager that are key to us. An inability to find a suitable replacement for any departing employee of our Manager or Fortress on a timely basis could materially adversely affect our ability to operate and grow our business.
In addition, our Manager may assign our Management Agreement to an entity whose business and operations are managed or supervised by Mr. Wesley R. Edens, who is a principal and a Co-Chairman of the board of directors of Fortress, an affiliate of our Manager, and a member of the management committee of Fortress since co-founding Fortress in May 1998. In the event of any such assignment to a non-affiliate of Fortress, the functions currently performed by our Manager’s current personnel may be performed by others. We can give you no assurance that such personnel would manage our operations in the same manner as our Manager currently does, and the failure by the personnel of any such entity to acquire assets generating attractive risk-adjusted returns could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
There are conflicts of interest in our relationship with our Manager.
Our Management Agreement, the Partnership Agreement and our operating agreement were negotiated among affiliated parties, and their terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if they had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third-party.
There are conflicts of interest inherent in our relationship with our Manager insofar as our Manager and its affiliates - including investment funds, private investment funds, or businesses managed by our Manager, including Seacastle Ships Holdings Inc., Trac Intermodal and Florida East Coast Railway, L.L.C. - invest in transportation and transportation-related infrastructure assets and whose investment objectives overlap with our asset acquisition objectives. Certain opportunities appropriate for us may also be appropriate for one or more of these other investment vehicles. Certain members of our board of directors and employees of our Manager who are our officers also serve as officers and/or directors of these other entities. For example, we have some of the same directors and officers as Seacastle Ships Holdings Inc., Trac Intermodal and Florida East Coast Railway, L.L.C. Although we have the same Manager, we may compete with entities affiliated with our Manager or Fortress, including Seacastle Ships Holdings Inc., Trac Intermodal and Florida East Coast Railway, L.L.C., for certain target assets. From time to time, affiliates of Fortress focus on investments in assets with a similar profile as our target assets that we may seek to acquire. These affiliates may have meaningful purchasing capacity, which may change over time depending upon a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, available equity capital and debt financing, market conditions and cash on hand. Fortress has multiple existing and planned funds focused on investing in one or more of our target sectors, each with significant

81


current or expected capital commitments. We may co-invest with these funds in transportation and transportation-related infrastructure assets. Fortress funds generally have a fee structure similar to ours, but the fees actually paid will vary depending on the size, terms and performance of each fund. Fortress had approximately $72 billion of assets under management as of September 30, 2015 .
Our Management Agreement generally does not limit or restrict our Manager or its affiliates from engaging in any business or managing other pooled investment vehicles that invest in assets that meet our asset acquisition objectives. Our Manager intends to engage in additional transportation and infrastructure related management and transportation, infrastructure and other investment opportunities in the future, which may compete with us for investments or result in a change in our current investment strategy. In addition, our operating agreement provides that if Fortress or an affiliate or any of their officers, directors or employees acquire knowledge of a potential transaction that could be a corporate opportunity, they have no duty, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to offer such corporate opportunity to us, our shareholders or our affiliates. In the event that any of our directors and officers who is also a director, officer or employee of Fortress or its affiliates acquires knowledge of a corporate opportunity or is offered a corporate opportunity, provided that this knowledge was not acquired solely in such person’s capacity as a director or officer of FTAI and such person acts in good faith, then to the fullest extent permitted by law such person is deemed to have fully satisfied such person’s fiduciary duties owed to us and is not liable to us if Fortress or its affiliates pursues or acquires the corporate opportunity or if such person did not present the corporate opportunity to us.
The ability of our Manager and its officers and employees to engage in other business activities, subject to the terms of our Management Agreement, may reduce the amount of time our Manager, its officers or other employees spend managing us. In addition, we may engage (subject to our strategy) in material transactions with our Manager or another entity managed by our Manager or one of its affiliates, including Seacastle Ships Holdings Inc., Trac Intermodal and Florida East Coast Railway, L.L.C., which may include, but are not limited to, certain acquisitions, financing arrangements, purchases of debt, co-investments, consumer loans, servicing advances and other assets that present an actual, potential or perceived conflict of interest. Our board of directors adopted a policy regarding the approval of any “related person transactions” pursuant to which, certain of the material transactions described above may require disclosure to, and approval by, the independent members of our board of directors. It is possible that actual, potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to investor dissatisfaction, litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. Appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult, and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with one or more potential, actual or perceived conflicts of interest. Regulatory scrutiny of, or litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which could materially adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including causing an inability to raise additional funds, a reluctance of counterparties to do business with us, a decrease in the prices of our equity securities and a resulting increased risk of litigation and regulatory enforcement actions.
The structure of our Manager’s and the General Partner’s compensation arrangements may have unintended consequences for us. We have agreed to pay our Manager a management fee and the General Partner is entitled to receive incentive allocations from Holdco that are each based on different measures of performance. Consequently, there may be conflicts in the incentives of our Manager to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for us. In addition, because the General Partner and our Manager are both affiliates of Fortress, the Income Incentive Allocation paid to the General Partner may cause our Manager to place undue emphasis on the maximization of earnings, including through the use of leverage, at the expense of other objectives, such as preservation of capital, to achieve higher incentive allocations. Investments with higher yield potential are generally riskier or more speculative than investments with lower yield potential. This could result in increased risk to the value of our portfolio of assets and our common shares.
Our directors have approved a broad asset acquisition strategy for our Manager and do not approve each acquisition made by our Manager. In addition, we may change our strategy without a shareholder vote, which may result in our acquiring assets that are different, riskier or less profitable than our current assets.
Our Manager is authorized to follow a broad asset acquisition strategy. We may pursue other types of acquisitions as market conditions evolve. Our Manager makes decisions about our investments in accordance with broad investment guidelines adopted by our board of directors. Accordingly, we may, without a shareholder vote, change our target sectors and acquire a variety of assets that differ from, and are possibly riskier than, our current asset portfolio. Consequently, our Manager has great latitude in determining the types and categories of assets it may decide are proper investments for us, including the latitude to invest in types and categories of assets that may differ from those in our existing portfolio. Our directors will periodically review our strategy and our portfolio of assets. However, our board does not review or pre-approve each proposed acquisition or our related financing arrangements. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, the directors rely primarily on information provided to them by our Manager. Furthermore, transactions entered into by our Manager may be difficult or impossible to reverse by the time they are reviewed by the directors even if the transactions contravene the terms of the Management Agreement. In addition, we may change our asset acquisition strategy, including our target asset classes, without a shareholder vote.

82


Our asset acquisition strategy may evolve in light of existing market conditions and investment opportunities, and this evolution may involve additional risks depending upon the nature of the assets we target and our ability to finance such assets on a short or long-term basis. Opportunities that present unattractive risk-return profiles relative to other available opportunities under particular market conditions may become relatively attractive under changed market conditions and changes in market conditions may therefore result in changes in the assets we target. Decisions to make acquisitions in new asset categories present risks that may be difficult for us to adequately assess and could therefore reduce or eliminate our ability to pay dividends on our common shares or have adverse effects on our liquidity or financial condition. A change in our asset acquisition strategy may also increase our exposure to interest rate, foreign currency or credit market fluctuations. In addition, a change in our asset acquisition strategy may increase our use of non-match-funded financing, increase the guarantee obligations we agree to incur or increase the number of transactions we enter into with affiliates. Our failure to accurately assess the risks inherent in new asset categories or the financing risks associated with such assets could adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
Our Manager will not be liable to us for any acts or omissions performed in accordance with the Management Agreement, including with respect to the performance of our assets.
Pursuant to our Management Agreement, our Manager will not assume any responsibility other than to render the services called for thereunder in good faith and will not be responsible for any action of our board of directors in following or declining to follow its advice or recommendations. Our Manager, its members, managers, officers and employees will not be liable to us or any of our subsidiaries, to our board of directors, or our or any subsidiary’s shareholders or partners for any acts or omissions by our Manager, its members, managers, officers or employees, except liability to the Company, our shareholders, directors, officers and employees and persons controlling us, by reason of acts constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence or reckless disregard of our Manager’s duties under our Management Agreement. We will, to the full extent lawful, reimburse, indemnify and hold our Manager, its members, managers, officers and employees, sub-advisers and each other person, if any, controlling our Manager harmless of and from any and all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims of any nature whatsoever (including attorneys’ fees) in respect of or arising from any acts or omissions of an indemnified party made in good faith in the performance of our Manager’s duties under our Management Agreement and not constituting such indemnified party’s bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence or reckless disregard of our Manager’s duties under our Management Agreement.
Our Manager’s due diligence of potential asset acquisitions or other transactions may not identify all pertinent risks, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our Manager intends to conduct due diligence with respect to each asset acquisition opportunity or other transaction it pursues. It is possible, however, that our Manager’s due diligence processes will not uncover all relevant facts, particularly with respect to any assets we acquire from third parties. In these cases, our Manager may be given limited access to information about the asset and will rely on information provided by the seller of the asset. In addition, if asset acquisition opportunities are scarce, the process for selecting bidders is competitive, or the timeframe in which we are required to complete diligence is short, our ability to conduct a due diligence investigation may be limited, and we would be required to make decisions based upon a less thorough diligence process than would otherwise be the case. Accordingly, transactions that initially appear to be viable may prove not to be over time, due to the limitations of the due diligence process or other factors.
Risks Related to Taxation
Shareholders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on their share of our taxable income, regardless of whether they receive any cash dividends from us.
So long as we would not be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 if we were a U.S. Corporation and 90% of our gross income for each taxable year constitutes “qualifying income” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), on a continuing basis, FTAI will be treated, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as a partnership and not as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. Shareholders may be subject to U.S. federal, state, local and possibly, in some cases, non-U.S. income taxation on their allocable share of our items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit (including our allocable share of those items of Holdco or any other entity in which we invest that is treated as a partnership or is otherwise subject to tax on a flow through basis) for each of our taxable years ending with or within their taxable year, regardless of whether they receive cash dividends from us. Shareholders may not receive cash dividends equal to their allocable share of our net taxable income or even the tax liability that results from that income.
In addition, certain of our holdings, including holdings, if any, in a Controlled Foreign Corporation (“CFC”) or a Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”), may produce taxable income prior to our receipt of cash relating to such income, and shareholders subject to U.S. federal income tax will be required to take such income into account in determining their taxable income.

83


Under our operating agreement, in the event of an inadvertent partnership termination in which the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has granted us limited relief, each shareholder also is obligated to make such adjustments as are required by the IRS to maintain our status as a partnership. Such adjustments may require shareholders to recognize additional amounts in income during the years in which they have held common shares. We may also be required to make payments to the IRS.
Tax gain or loss on a sale or other disposition of our common shares could be more or less than expected.
If a sale of our common shares by a shareholder is taxable in the United States, the shareholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized by such shareholder on such sale and such shareholder’s adjusted tax basis in those shares. Prior distributions to such shareholder in excess of the total net taxable income allocated to such shareholder, which will have decreased such shareholder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares, will effectively increase any gain recognized by such shareholder if the shares are sold at a price greater than such shareholder’s adjusted tax basis in those shares, even if the price is less than their original cost to such shareholder. A portion of the amount realized, whether or not representing gain, may be treated as ordinary income to such shareholder.
Our ability to make distributions depends on our receiving sufficient cash distributions from our subsidiaries, and we cannot assure our shareholders that we will be able to make cash distributions to them in amounts that are sufficient to fund their tax liabilities.
Our subsidiaries may be subject to local taxes in each of the relevant territories and jurisdictions in which they operate, including taxes on income, profits or gains and withholding taxes. As a result, our funds available for distribution is indirectly reduced by such taxes, and the post-tax return to our shareholders is similarly reduced by such taxes.
In general, a shareholder that is subject to U.S. federal income tax must include in income its allocable share of FTAI’s items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit (including, so long as FTAI is treated as a partnership for tax purposes, FTAI’s allocable share of those items of Holdco and any pass-through subsidiaries of Holdco) for each of our taxable years ending with or within such shareholder’s taxable year. However, the cash distributed to a shareholder may not be sufficient to pay the full amount of such shareholder’s tax liability in respect of its investment in us, because each shareholder’s tax liability depends on such shareholder’s particular tax situation and the tax treatment of our underlying activities or assets.
If we are treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the value of the shares could be adversely affected.
We have not requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the IRS on our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or on any other matter affecting us. As of the date of the consummation of our initial public offering, under then current law and assuming full compliance with the terms of our operating agreement (and other relevant documents) and based upon factual statements and representations made by us, our outside counsel opined that we will be treated as a partnership, and not as an association or a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, opinions of counsel are not binding upon the IRS or any court, and the IRS may challenge this conclusion and a court may sustain such a challenge. The factual representations made by us upon which our outside counsel relied relate to our organization, operation, assets, activities, income, and present and future conduct of our operations. In general, if an entity that would otherwise be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes is a “publicly traded partnership” (as defined in the Code) it will be nonetheless treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, unless the exception described below, and upon which we intend to rely, applies. A publicly traded partnership will, however, be treated as a partnership, and not as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, so long as 90% or more of its gross income for each taxable year constitutes “qualifying income” within the meaning of the Code and it is not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. We refer to this exception as the “Qualifying Income Exception.”
Qualifying income generally includes dividends, interest, capital gains from the sale or other disposition of stocks and securities and certain other forms of investment income. We currently expect that a substantial portion of our income will constitute either “Subpart F” income (defined below) derived from CFCs or QEF Inclusions (as defined below). While we believe that such income constitutes qualifying income, no assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with such position. We also believe that our return from investments will include interest, dividends, capital gains and other types of qualifying income, but no assurance can be given as to the types of income that will be earned in any given year.
If we fail to satisfy the Qualifying Income Exception, we would be required to pay U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates on our worldwide income. In addition, we would likely be liable for state and local income and/or franchise taxes on such income. Dividends to shareholders would constitute ordinary dividend income taxable to such shareholders to the extent of our earnings and profits, and the payment of these dividends would not be deductible by us. Taxation of us as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation could result in a material adverse effect on our cash flow and the after-tax returns for shareholders and thus could result in a substantial reduction in the value of our common shares.

84


Non-U.S. Holders (defined below) should anticipate being required to file U.S. tax returns and may be required to pay U.S. tax solely on account of owning and disposing of our common shares.
In light of our intended investment activities, we may be, or may become, engaged in a U.S. trade or business for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in which case some portion of our income would be treated as effectively connected income with respect to Non-U.S. Holders. Moreover, we anticipate that, in the future, we will sell interests in U.S. real holding property corporations (each a “USRPHC”) and therefore be deemed to be engaged in a U.S. trade or business for that reason at such time. If we were to realize gain from the sale or other disposition of a U.S. real property interest (including a USRPHC) or were otherwise engaged in a U.S. trade or business, Non-U.S. Holders generally would be required to file U.S. federal income tax returns and would be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax on their allocable share of the effectively connected income on gain at the highest marginal U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to ordinary income. Non-U.S. holders that are corporations may also be subject to a branch profits tax on their allocable share of such income. In addition, if we were treated as being engaged in a U.S. trade or business, a portion of any gain recognized by a Non-U.S. Holder on the sale or exchange of its common shares could be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as effectively connected income, and hence such Non-U.S. Holder could be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the sale or exchange. Accordingly, Non-U.S. Holders should anticipate being required to file U.S. tax returns and may be required to pay U.S. tax solely on account of owning our common shares.
Non-U.S. Holders that hold (or are deemed to hold) more than 5% of our common shares (or held, or were deemed to hold, more than 5% of our common shares) may be subject to U.S. federal income tax upon the disposition of some or all their common shares.
If a Non-U.S. Holder held more than 5% of our common shares at any time during the 5 year period preceding such Non-U.S. Holder’s disposition of our common shares, and we were considered a USRPHC (determined as if we were a U.S. corporation) at any time during such 5 year period because of our current or previous ownership of U.S. real property interests above a certain threshold, such Non-U.S. Holder may be subject to U.S. tax on such disposition of our common shares (and may have a U.S. tax return filing obligation).
Tax-exempt shareholders may face certain adverse U.S. tax consequences from owning our common shares.
We are not required to manage our operations in a manner that would minimize the likelihood of generating income that would constitute “unrelated business taxable income” (“UBTI”) to the extent allocated to a tax-exempt shareholder. Although we expect to invest through subsidiaries that are treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes and such corporate investments would generally not result in an allocation of UBTI to a shareholder on account of the activities of those subsidiaries, we may not invest through corporate subsidiaries in all cases. Moreover, UBTI includes income attributable to debt-financed property and we are not prohibited from debt financing our investments, including investments in subsidiaries. Furthermore, we are not prohibited from being (or causing a subsidiary to be) a guarantor of loans made to a subsidiary. If we (or certain of our subsidiaries) were treated as the borrower for U.S. tax purposes on account of those guarantees, some or all of our investments could be considered debt-financed property. The potential for income to be characterized as UBTI could make our common shares an unsuitable investment for a tax-exempt entity. Tax-exempt shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of an investment in common shares.
We may hold or acquire certain investments through an entity classified as a PFIC or CFC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Certain of our investments may be in non-U.S. corporations or may be acquired through a non-U.S. subsidiary that would be classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such an entity may be a PFIC or a CFC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. U.S. Holders indirectly owning an interest in a PFIC or a CFC may experience adverse U.S. tax consequences.
If substantially all of the U.S. source rental income derived from aircraft or ships used to transport passengers or cargo in international traffic (“U.S. source international transport rental income”) of any of our non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries is attributable to activities of personnel based in the United States, such subsidiary could be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at regular tax rates, rather than at a rate of 4% on gross income, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased funds available for distribution to our shareholders.
We expect that the U.S. source international transport rental income of our non-U.S. subsidiaries generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax, on a gross income basis, at a rate of not in excess of 4% as provided in Section 887 of the Code. If, contrary to expectations, any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries that is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes did not comply with certain administrative guidelines of the IRS, such that 90% or more of such subsidiary’s U.S. source international transport rental income were attributable to the activities of personnel based in the United States (in the case of bareboat leases) or from “regularly scheduled transportation” as defined is such administrative guidelines (in the case of time-charter leases), such subsidiary’s U.S. source rental income would be treated as income effectively connected with a trade or

85


business in the United States. In such case, such subsidiary’s U.S. source international transport rental income would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a maximum rate of 35%. In addition, such subsidiary would be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such taxes would adversely affect our business and would result in decreased funds available for distribution to our shareholders.
Our subsidiaries may become subject to unanticipated tax liabilities that may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our subsidiaries may be subject to income, withholding or other taxes in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions by reason of their activities and operations, where their assets are used, or where the lessees of their assets (or others in possession of their assets) are located, and it is also possible that taxing authorities in any such jurisdictions could assert that our subsidiaries are subject to greater taxation than we currently anticipate. For example, a portion of certain of our non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries’ income is treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, and is accordingly subject to U.S. federal income tax. It is possible that the IRS could assert that a greater portion of any such non-U.S. subsidiaries’ income is effectively connected income that should be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Our structure involves complex provisions of U.S. federal income tax law for which no clear precedent or authority may be available. Our structure also is subject to potential legislative, judicial or administrative change and differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis.
The U.S. federal income tax treatment of our shareholders depends in some instances on determinations of fact and interpretations of complex provisions of U.S. federal income tax law for which no clear precedent or authority may be available. Prospective investors should be aware that the U.S. federal income tax rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process, the IRS, and the U.S. Treasury Department, frequently resulting in revised interpretations of established concepts, statutory changes, revisions to regulations and other modifications and interpretations. The IRS pays close attention to the proper application of tax laws to partnerships. The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of an investment in our common shares may be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial interpretation at any time, possibly on a retroactive basis, and any such action may affect our investments and commitments that were previously made, and could adversely affect the value of our shares or cause us to change the way we conduct our business.
Our organizational documents and agreements permit the board of directors to modify our operating agreement from time to time, without the consent of shareholders, in order to address certain changes in Treasury regulations, legislation or interpretation. In some circumstances, such revisions could have a material adverse impact on some or all shareholders. Moreover, we will apply certain assumptions and conventions in an attempt to comply with applicable rules and to report income, gain, deduction, loss and credit to shareholders in a manner that reflects such shareholders’ beneficial ownership of partnership items, taking into account variation in ownership interests during each taxable year because of trading activity. However, these assumptions and conventions may not be in compliance with all aspects of applicable tax requirements. It is possible that the IRS will assert successfully that the conventions and assumptions used by us do not satisfy the technical requirements of the Code and/or Treasury regulations and could require that items of income, gain, deduction, loss or credit, including interest deductions, be adjusted, reallocated, or disallowed, in a manner that adversely affects shareholders.
We could incur a significant tax liability if the IRS successfully asserts that the “anti-stapling” rules apply to our investments in our non-U.S. and U.S. subsidiaries, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased funds available for distribution to our shareholders.
If we were subject to the “anti-stapling” rules of Section 269B of the Code, we would incur a significant tax liability as a result of owning more than 50% of the value of both U.S. and non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries, whose equity interests constitute “stapled interests” that may only be transferred together. If the “anti-stapling” rules applied, our non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries that are treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes would be treated as U.S. corporations, which would cause those entities to be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on their worldwide income. Because we intend to separately manage and operate our non-U.S. and U.S. corporate subsidiaries and structure their business activities in a manner that would allow us to dispose of such subsidiaries separately, we do not expect that the “anti-stapling” rules will apply. However, there can be no assurance that the IRS would not successfully assert a contrary position, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased funds available for distribution to our shareholders.
We cannot match transferors and transferees of our shares, and we have therefore adopted certain income tax accounting positions that may not conform with all aspects of applicable tax requirements. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could adversely affect the value of our shares.
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of our shares, we have adopted depreciation, amortization and other tax accounting positions that may not conform with all aspects of existing Treasury regulations. A successful IRS challenge to those positions could adversely affect the amount of tax benefits available to our shareholders. It also could affect the timing of

86


these tax benefits or the amount of gain on the sale of our common shares and could have a negative impact on the value of our common shares or result in audits of and adjustments to our shareholders’ tax returns.
We may allocate items of income, gain, loss, and deduction using a monthly or other convention, whereby any such items we recognize in a given month are allocated to our shareholders as of a specified date of such month. As a result, if a shareholder transfers its common shares, it might be allocated income, gain, loss, and deduction realized by us after the date of the transfer. Similarly, if a shareholder acquires additional common shares, it might be allocated income, gain, loss, and deduction realized by us prior to its ownership of such common shares. Consequently, our shareholders may recognize income in excess of cash distributions received from us, and any income so included by a shareholder would increase the basis such shareholder has in it common shares and would offset any gain (or increase the amount of loss) realized by such shareholder on a subsequent disposition of its common shares.
The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our common shares within a 12-month period will result in our termination for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
We will be considered to have terminated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes if there is a sale or exchange of 50% or more of our common shares within a 12-month period. Our termination would, among other things, result in the closing of our taxable year for all shareholders and could result in a deferral of depreciation and amortization deductions allowable in computing our taxable income.
Risks Related to Our Common Shares
There can be no assurance that the market for our shares will provide you with adequate liquidity.
There can be no assurance that an active trading market for our common shares will develop or be sustained in the future. Accordingly, if an active trading market for our common shares does not develop or is not maintained, the liquidity of our common shares, your ability to sell your common shares when desired and the prices that you may obtain for your common shares will be adversely affected.
The market price and trading volume of our common shares may be volatile, which could result in rapid and substantial losses for our shareholders.
Even if an active trading market develops, the market price of our common shares may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our common shares may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our common shares declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at or above your purchase price, if at all. The market price of our common shares may fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. Some of the factors that could negatively affect our share price or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our common shares include:
•
a shift in our investor base;
•
our quarterly or annual earnings, or those of other comparable companies;
•
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
•
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;
•
announcements by us or our competitors of significant investments, acquisitions or dispositions;
•
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common shares;
•
changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts or our ability to meet those estimates;
•
the operating and share price performance of other comparable companies;
•
overall market fluctuations;
•
general economic conditions; and
•
developments in the markets and market sectors in which we participate.
Stock markets in the United States have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. Market fluctuations, as well as general political and economic conditions such as acts of terrorism, prolonged economic uncertainty, a recession or interest rate or currency rate fluctuations, could adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and due to our taking advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, our common shares could be less attractive to investors.

87


We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. As such, we have taken advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (a) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (b) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of our initial public offering, (c) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common shares that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (d) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period. Because we have taken advantage of each of these exemptions, we do not know if some investors will find our common shares less attractive as a result. The result may be a less active trading market for our common shares and our share price may be more volatile.
We are required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls, and the outcome of that effort may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
As a public company, we are required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the timing of when to comply with the auditor attestation requirements will be determined based on whether we take advantage of certain JOBS Act provisions applicable to emerging growth companies). Section 404 requires that we evaluate our internal control over financial reporting to enable management to report on the effectiveness of those controls. We have undertaken a review of our internal controls and procedures. While we have begun the process of evaluating our internal controls, we are in the early phases of our review. The outcome of our review may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. During the course of our review, we may identify control deficiencies of varying degrees of severity, and we may incur significant costs to remediate those deficiencies or otherwise improve our internal controls. As a public company, we are required to report control deficiencies that constitute a “material weakness” in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, we may be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, including the SEC or the NYSE. Furthermore, if we discover a material weakness, our share price could decline and our ability to raise capital could be impaired.
Your percentage ownership in us may be diluted in the future.
Your percentage ownership in FTAI may be diluted in the future because of equity awards that may be granted to our Manager pursuant to our Management Agreement. Upon the successful completion of an offering of our common shares or other equity securities (including securities issued as consideration in an acquisition), we will grant our Manager options to purchase common shares in an amount equal to 10% of the number of common shares being sold in such offering (or if the issuance relates to equity securities other than our common shares, options to purchase a number of common shares equal to 10% of the gross capital raised in the equity issuance divided by the fair market value of a common share as of the date of the issuance), with an exercise price equal to the offering price per share paid by the public or other ultimate purchaser or attributed to such securities in connection with an acquisition (or the fair market value of a common share as of the date of the equity issuance if it relates to equity securities other than our common shares), and any such offering or the exercise of the option in connection with such offering would cause dilution.
Our board of directors has adopted the Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors Nonqualified Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) which provides for the grant of equity-based awards, including restricted stock, stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance awards, restricted stock units, tandem awards and other equity-based and non-equity based awards, in each case to our Manager, to the directors, officers, employees, service providers, consultants and advisors of our Manager who perform services for us, and to our directors, officers, employees, service providers, consultants and advisors. We have initially reserved 30,000,000 common shares for issuance under the Incentive Plan; on the date of any equity issuance by the Company during the ten-year term of the Incentive Plan (including in respect of securities issued as consideration in an acquisition), the maximum number of shares available for issuance under the Plan will be increased to include an additional number of common shares equal to ten percent (10%) of either (i) the total number of common shares newly issued by the Company in such equity issuance or (ii) if such equity issuance relates to equity securities other than our common shares, a number of our common shares equal to 10% of (i) the gross capital raised in an equity issuance of equity securities other than common shares during the ten-year term of the Incentive Plan, divided by (ii) the fair market value of a common share as of the date of such equity issuance.
Sales or issuances of shares of our common shares could adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common shares in the public market, or the perception that such sales might occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common shares. The issuance of our common shares in connection with

88


property, portfolio or business acquisitions or the exercise of outstanding options or otherwise could also have an adverse effect on the market price of our common shares.
We and our executive officers, directors, Initial Shareholders and the General Partner have agreed that, for a period of 180 days from May 14, 2015, we and they will not, without the prior written consent of the representatives of the underwriters in our initial public offering, dispose of or hedge any shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common shares. The underwriters, in their sole discretion, may release any of the securities subject to these lock-up agreements at any time, which, in the case of officers and directors, shall be with notice. If the restrictions under the lock-up agreements are waived or upon the expiration of the lock-up agreements, a substantial amount of our common shares may become available for sale into the market, subject to applicable law, which could reduce the market price for our common shares.
The incurrence or issuance of debt, which ranks senior to our common shares upon our liquidation, and future issuances of equity or equity-related securities, which would dilute the holdings of our existing common shareholders and may be senior to our common shares for the purposes of making distributions, periodically or upon liquidation, may negatively affect the market price of our common shares.
We have incurred and may in the future incur or issue debt or issue equity or equity-related securities to finance our operations. Upon our liquidation, lenders and holders of our debt and holders of our preferred shares (if any) would receive a distribution of our available assets before common shareholders. Any future incurrence or issuance of debt would increase our interest cost and could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. We are not required to offer any additional equity securities to existing common shareholders on a preemptive basis. Therefore, additional issuances of common shares, directly or through convertible or exchangeable securities (including limited partnership interests in our operating partnership), warrants or options, will dilute the holdings of our existing common shareholders and such issuances, or the perception of such issuances, may reduce the market price of our common shares. Any preferred shares issued by us would likely have a preference on distribution payments, periodically or upon liquidation, which could eliminate or otherwise limit our ability to make distributions to common shareholders. Because our decision to incur or issue debt or issue equity or equity-related securities in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, nature or success of our future capital raising efforts. Thus, common shareholders bear the risk that our future incurrence or issuance of debt or issuance of equity or equity-related securities will adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
Our determination of how much leverage to use to finance our acquisitions may adversely affect our return on our assets and may reduce funds available for distribution.
We utilize leverage to finance many of our asset acquisitions, which entitles certain lenders to cash flows prior to retaining a return on our assets. While our Manager targets using only what we believe to be reasonable leverage, our strategy does not limit the amount of leverage we may incur with respect to any specific asset. The return we are able to earn on our assets and funds available for distribution to our shareholders may be significantly reduced due to changes in market conditions, which may cause the cost of our financing to increase relative to the income that can be derived from our assets.
While we currently intend to pay regular quarterly dividends to our shareholders, we may change our dividend policy at any time.
Although we currently intend to pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common shares, we may change our dividend policy at any time. The declaration and payment of dividends to holders of our common shares will be at the discretion of our board of directors in accordance with applicable law after taking into account various factors, including actual results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, restrictions imposed by applicable law, our taxable income, our operating expenses and other factors our board of directors deem relevant. Our long term goal is to maintain a payout ratio of between 50-60% of funds available for distribution, with remaining amounts used primarily to fund our future acquisitions and opportunities. As a public company, there can be no assurance that we will pay dividends in amounts or on a basis consistent with prior distributions to our investors, if at all. Because we are a holding company and have no direct operations, we will only be able to pay dividends from our available cash on hand and any funds we receive from our subsidiaries and our ability to receive distributions from our subsidiaries may be limited by the financing agreements to which they are subject. For example, the Jefferson Terminal Credit Agreement (as herein defined) contains a covenant that limits its ability to pay dividends to us. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Debt Obligations” for a discussion of the restrictions on distributions contained in the Jefferson Terminal Credit Agreement. In addition, pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the General Partner will be entitled to receive incentive allocations before any amounts are distributed by the Company based both on our consolidated net income and capital gains income in each fiscal quarter and for each fiscal year, respectively.
Anti-takeover provisions in our operating agreement and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control.

89


Provisions in our operating agreement may make it more difficult and expensive for a third party to acquire control of us even if a change of control would be beneficial to the interests of our shareholders. For example, our operating agreement provides for a staggered board, requires advance notice for proposals by shareholders and nominations, places limitations on convening shareholder meetings, and authorizes the issuance of preferred shares that could be issued by our board of directors to thwart a takeover attempt. In addition, certain provisions of Delaware law may delay or prevent a transaction that could cause a change in our control. The market price of our shares could be adversely affected to the extent that provisions of our operating agreement discourage potential takeover attempts that our shareholders may favor.
There are certain provisions in our operating agreement regarding exculpation and indemnification of our officers and directors that differ from the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) in a manner that may be less protective of the interests of our shareholders.
Our operating agreement provides that to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law our directors or officers will not be liable to us. Under the DGCL, a director or officer would be liable to us for (i) breach of duty of loyalty to us or our shareholders, (ii) intentional misconduct or knowing violations of the law that are not done in good faith, (iii) improper redemption of shares or declaration of dividend, or (iv) a transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. In addition, our operating agreement provides that we indemnify our directors and officers for acts or omissions to the fullest extent provided by law. Under the DGCL, a corporation can only indemnify directors and officers for acts or omissions if the director or officer acted in good faith, in a manner he reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation, and, in criminal action, if the officer or director had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. Accordingly, our operating agreement may be less protective of the interests of our shareholders, when compared to the DGCL, insofar as it relates to the exculpation and indemnification of our officers and directors.
As a public company, we will incur additional costs and face increased demands on our management.
As a newly public company with shares listed on the NYSE, we need to comply with an extensive body of regulations that did not apply to us previously, including certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, regulations of the SEC and requirements of the NYSE. We expect these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities to our board of directors more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming a public company, we have added independent directors and created additional board committees. In addition, we may incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements and maintaining directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules, which may impose additional costs on us and have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they downgrade their recommendations regarding our common shares, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common shares will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If any of the analysts who cover us downgrades our common units or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our common share price may decline. If analysts cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our common share price or trading volume to decline and our common shares to be less liquid.
Item 2.         Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.
Item 3.         Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.
Item 4.         Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.
Item 5.         Other Information

None.

90


Item 6.         Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:

FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS LLC
By:
/s/ Joseph P. Adams, Jr.
Joseph P. Adams, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
November 4, 2015


By:
/s/ Jonathan G. Atkeson
Jonathan G. Atkeson
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
November 4, 2015


By:
/s/ Scott Christopher
Scott Christopher
Chief Accounting Officer
November 4, 2015








91



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
Description
3.1
Certificate of Formation (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed April 30, 2015).
3.2
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 21, 2015).
10.1
Fourth Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of Fortress Worldwide Transportation and Infrastructure General Partnership (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 21, 2015).
10.2
Management and Advisory Agreement, dated as of  May 20, 2015, between Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC and FIG LLC (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 21, 2015).
10.3
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC Nonqualified Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 21, 2015).
10.4
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of  May 20, 2015, among Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC, FIG LLC and Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Master GP LLC (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 21, 2015).
10.5
Form of director and officer indemnification agreement of Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed April 30, 2015).
10.6
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2014, among Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as administrative agent, Jefferson Gulf Coast Energy Partners LLC and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed April 30, 2015).
21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed April 30, 2015).
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.


92

TABLE OF CONTENTS