FTK 10-Q Quarterly Report Sept. 30, 2013 | Alphaminr
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES INC/CN/
ALPHAMINR

FTK 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013

Balance Sheet
Cash Flow
Income Statement
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES INC/CN/
10-Qs and 10-Ks
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q
 		Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q
 		Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009
PROXIES
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 2, 2025
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 24, 2024
DEF 14A
 		Filed on July 27, 2023
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 28, 2023
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 29, 2022
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 5, 2022
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 22, 2021
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 3, 2020
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 24, 2019
DEF 14A
 		Filed on March 30, 2018
DEF 14A
 		Filed on March 24, 2017
DEF 14A
 		Filed on March 23, 2016
DEF 14A
 		Filed on March 27, 2015
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 18, 2014
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 10, 2013
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 16, 2012
DEF 14A
 		Filed on April 18, 2011
DEF 14A
 		Filed on July 13, 2010
10-Q 1 a2013093010q.htm 10-Q 2013.09.30 10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to
Commission File Number 1-13270
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
90-0023731
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
10603 W. Sam Houston Parkway N. #300
Houston, TX
77064
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(713) 849-9911
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
¨
Accelerated filer
x
Non-accelerated filer
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ¨ No x
As of October 31, 2013, there were 51,644,969 outstanding shares of Flotek Industries, Inc. common stock, $0.0001 par value.


TABLE OF CONTENTS



2


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
September 30,
2013
December 31,
2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
4,369

$
2,700

Restricted cash
—

150

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $767 and $714 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively
62,244

42,259

Inventories, net
70,857

45,177

Deferred tax assets, net
1,591

1,274

Other current assets
4,953

4,654

Total current assets
144,014

96,214

Property and equipment, net
77,269

56,499

Goodwill
66,271

26,943

Deferred tax assets, net
14,763

16,045

Other intangible assets, net
78,662

24,166

TOTAL ASSETS
$
380,979

$
219,867

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
$
23,884

$
22,373

Accrued liabilities
13,613

6,503

Income taxes payable
3,379

3,479

Interest payable
132

114

Convertible senior notes, net of discount
—

5,133

Current portion of long-term debt
35,529

4,329

Total current liabilities
76,537

41,931

Long-term debt, less current portion
41,110

22,455

Deferred tax liabilities, net
25,491

751

Total liabilities
143,138

65,137

Commitments and contingencies


Stockholders’ equity:
Cumulative convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
—

—

Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized; 58,158,051 shares issued and 51,614,119 shares outstanding at September 30, 2013; 53,123,978 shares issued and 49,601,495 shares outstanding at December 31, 2012
6

5

Additional paid-in capital
261,887

195,485

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(201
)
(40
)
Accumulated deficit
(11,846
)
(37,019
)
Treasury stock, at cost; 5,198,003 and 2,198,193 shares at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively
(12,005
)
(3,701
)
Total stockholders’ equity
237,841

154,730

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$
380,979

$
219,867


See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
3

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Revenue
$
98,388

$
78,628

$
270,217

$
236,126

Cost of revenue
60,886

44,785

162,491

135,807

Gross margin
37,502

33,843

107,726

100,319

Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative
19,542

17,171

58,640

47,860

Depreciation and amortization
2,038

1,170

5,231

3,166

Research and development
835

909

2,689

2,363

Total expenses
22,415

19,250

66,560

53,389

Income from operations
15,087

14,593

41,166

46,930

Other income (expense):
Loss on extinguishment of debt
—

—

—

(6,386
)
Change in fair value of warrant liability
—

—

—

2,649

Interest expense
(530
)
(1,830
)
(1,495
)
(6,245
)
Other income (expense), net
59

(17
)
117

(367
)
Total other income (expense)
(471
)
(1,847
)
(1,378
)
(10,349
)
Income before income taxes
14,616

12,746

39,788

36,581

Income tax expense
(5,648
)
(2,940
)
(14,615
)
(9,991
)
Net income
$
8,968

$
9,806

$
25,173

$
26,590

Earnings per common share:
Basic earnings per common share
$
0.17

$
0.20

$
0.50

$
0.55

Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.16

$
0.19

$
0.47

$
0.52

Weighted average common shares:
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic earnings per common share
52,742

48,384

50,819

48,054

Weighted average common shares used in computing diluted earnings per common share
55,317

53,478

53,407

50,737



See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
4

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Net income
$
8,968

$
9,806

$
25,173

$
26,590

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(22
)
12

(179
)
(16
)
Unrealized gain on investments available for sale
5

—

18

—

Other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(17
)
$
12

$
(161
)
$
(16
)
Comprehensive income
$
8,951

$
9,818

$
25,012

$
26,574



See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
5

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
25,173

$
26,590

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Change in fair value of warrant liability
—

(2,649
)
Depreciation and amortization
10,948

8,468

Amortization of deferred financing costs
65

739

Accretion of debt discount
55

2,862

Gain on sale of assets
(3,452
)
(3,039
)
Stock compensation expense
8,697

9,571

Deferred income tax provision
(315
)
1,018

Excess tax benefit related to share-based awards
(835
)
(579
)
Non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt
—

4,270

Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash
150

—

Accounts receivable, net
(6,521
)
532

Inventories
(2,055
)
(4,287
)
Other current assets
259

(2,213
)
Accounts payable
(17,341
)
808

Accrued liabilities
4,931

1,092

Income taxes payable
1,585

(2,993
)
Interest payable
16

(1,733
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
21,360

38,457

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
(9,985
)
(15,243
)
Proceeds from sale of assets
4,595

3,376

Payments for acquisition, net of cash acquired
(53,396
)
—

Purchase of patents and other intangible assets
—

(31
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(58,786
)
(11,898
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of indebtedness
(9,777
)
(51,828
)
Proceeds of borrowings
26,190

—

Borrowings on revolving credit facility
231,696

—

Repayments on revolving credit facility
(204,319
)
—

Debt issuance costs
(1,207
)
—

Issuance costs of preferred stock and detachable warrants
(200
)
—

Excess tax benefit related to share-based awards
835

579

Purchase of treasury stock
(5,325
)
(497
)
Proceeds from sale of common stock
567

—

Proceeds from exercise of stock options
491

167

Proceeds from the exercise of stock warrants
323

263

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
39,274

(51,316
)
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
(179
)
(16
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
1,669

(24,773
)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
2,700

46,682

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
$
4,369

$
21,909



See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
6

FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands)
Common Stock
Treasury Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Accumulated
Deficit
Total
Shares
Issued
Par
Value
Shares
Cost
Balance, December 31, 2012
53,124

$
5

2,198

$
(3,701
)
$
195,485

$
(40
)
$
(37,019
)
$
154,730

Net income
—

—

—

—

—

—

25,173

25,173

Other comprehensive loss
—

—

—

—

—

(161
)
—

(161
)
Issuance costs of preferred stock and
detachable warrants
—

—

—

—

(200
)
—

—

(200
)
Stock warrants exercised
267

—

—

—

323

—

—

323

Stock options exercised
472

—

—

—

3,469

—

—

3,469

Stock surrendered for exercise of stock
options
—

—

191

(2,979
)
—

—

—

(2,979
)
Restricted stock granted
794

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Restricted stock forfeited
—

—

62

—

—

—

—

—

Stock granted in incentive performance
plan
217

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Treasury stock purchased
—

—

339

(5,325
)
—

—

—

(5,325
)
Excess tax benefit related to share-based
awards
—

—

—

—

835

—

—

835

Employee stock purchase plan
—

—

(32
)
—

567

—

—

567

Stock compensation expense
—

—

—

—

8,697

—

—

8,697

Stock issued in Florida Chemical Company
acquisition
3,284

1

—

—

52,711

—

—

52,712

Return of borrowed shares under share
lending agreement
—

—

2,440

—

—

—

—

—

Balance, September 30, 2013
58,158

$
6

5,198

$
(12,005
)
$
261,887

$
(201
)
$
(11,846
)
$
237,841



See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Note 1 — Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Nature of Operations
Flotek Industries, Inc. (“Flotek” or the “Company”) is a technology-driven, global developer and supplier of drilling, completion and production technologies and related services. With its acquisition of Florida Chemical Company, Inc. on May 10, 2013 (see Note 3), the Company expanded its energy specialty chemical technologies and added consumer and industrial chemical technologies as a new product line.
Flotek's strategic focus, and that of its diversified wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”), now includes energy related chemical technologies, drilling and artificial lift technologies, and consumer and industrial chemical technologies. Within energy technologies, the Company provides oilfield specialty chemicals and logistics, down-hole drilling tools and down-hole production tools used in the energy and mining industries. Flotek's products and services enable customers to drill wells more efficiently, to realize increased production from both new and existing wells and to decrease future well operating costs. Major customers include leading oilfield service providers, pressure-pumping service companies, onshore and offshore drilling contractors, and major and independent oil and gas exploration and production companies. Within consumer and industrial chemical technologies, the Company provides products for the flavor and fragrance industry and the industrial chemical industry. Major customers include beverage and food companies, fragrance companies, and companies providing household and industrial cleaning products.
The Company is headquartered in Houston, Texas, with operating locations in Florida, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Wyoming and The Netherlands. Flotek’s products are marketed both domestically and internationally, with international presence and/or initiatives in over 20 countries.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying footnotes (collectively the “Financial Statements”) reflect all adjustments, in the opinion of management, necessary for fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented. All such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The Financial Statements, including selected notes, have been prepared in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting and do not include all information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for comprehensive financial statement reporting. These interim Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”). A copy of the Annual Report is available on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov , under the Company’s ticker symbol (“FTK”) or on Flotek’s website, www.flotekind.com . The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013.
Business Combinations
Acquisitions are accounted for by applying the acquisition method. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. Costs incurred to affect the acquisition are recognized as expenses as incurred.
Cash Management
In January 2013, the Company began using a controlled disbursement account for its main cash account. Under this system, outstanding checks can be in excess of the cash balances at the bank before the disbursement account is funded, creating a book overdraft. Book overdrafts on this account are presented as a current liability in accounts payable in the consolidated balance sheets.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

8
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The reclassifications did not impact net income.
Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Application of New Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted the accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2012-02, “ Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment ,” which permits a company to perform qualitative assessments regarding the likelihood that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired and subsequently assess the need to perform a quantitative impairment test. Implementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted the accounting guidance in ASU No. 2013-02, " Comprehensive Income: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ," which provides accounting guidance on the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance requires an entity to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income if the amount is reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, a cross reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail about the reclassification amounts is required. Implementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 — Acquisition of Florida Chemical Company, Inc.
On May 10, 2013, the Company acquired Florida Chemical Company, Inc. ("Florida Chemical"), the world's largest processor of citrus oils and a pioneer in solvent, chemical synthesis, and flavor and fragrance applications from citrus oils. Florida Chemical has been an innovator in creating high performance, bio-based products for a variety of industries, including applications in the oil and gas industry. The acquisition brings a portfolio of high performance renewable and sustainable chemistries that perform well in the oil and gas industry as well as non-energy related markets. This expands the Company's business into consumer and industrial chemical technologies which provide products for the flavor and fragrance industry and the specialty chemical industry. These technologies are used by beverage and food companies, fragrance companies, and companies providing household and industrial cleaning products.
The Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Florida Chemical's common stock. The purchase consideration transferred is as follows (in thousands):
Cash
$
49,500

Common stock (3,284,180 shares)
52,711

Repayment of debt
4,227

Total purchase price
$
106,438


9
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

The allocation of the purchase consideration was based upon the estimated fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition. The allocation was made to major categories of assets and liabilities based on management's best estimates, supported by independent third-party analyses. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired, and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. The allocation of purchase consideration is as follows (in thousands):
Cash
$
331

Net working capital, net of cash
15,574

Property and equipment:
Personal property
13,400

Real property
6,750

Other assets
205

Other intangible assets:
Customer relationships
29,270

Trade names
12,670

Proprietary technology
14,080

Goodwill
39,328

Deferred tax impact of valuation adjustment
(25,170
)
Total purchase price allocation
$
106,438

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2012. This financial information does not purport to represent the results of operations which would actually have been obtained had the acquisition been completed as of January 1, 2012, or the results of operations that may be obtained in the future. Also, this financial information does not reflect the cost of any integration activities or benefits from the merger and synergies that may be derived from any integration activities, both of which may have a material effect on the consolidated results of operations in the periods following the completion of the merger.
Pro forma financial information is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Revenue
$
98,388

$
97,173

$
294,559

$
301,382

Net income
8,968

11,129

27,313

28,115

Earnings per common share:
Basic
$
0.17

$
0.23

$
0.54

$
0.59

Diluted
$
0.16

$
0.22

$
0.51

$
0.55

Pro forma adjustments include, but are not limited to, adjustments for amortization expense for acquired finite lived intangible assets, depreciation expense for the fair value of acquired property and equipment, interest expense for increased long-term debt and revolving credit facility borrowings required for the acquisition, and income tax expense on Florida Chemical income before income taxes. In addition, pro forma adjustments eliminate historical amortization, depreciation, and interest expense from the pro forma results of operations.

10
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

The acquisition was financed through increased long term debt of $25.0 million , additional borrowings on the Company's revolving credit facility of $28.7 million and the issuance of 3.3 million shares of the Company's common stock. An escrow fund totaling $10.0 million has been established to cover the indemnification obligations of Florida Chemical stockholders. Results of Florida Chemical's operations are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition, May 10, 2013. The Company's consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 include $18.6 million and $33.1 million of revenue, respectively, and $3.9 million and $6.6 million of income from operations, respectively, related to the operations of Florida Chemical.
The Company incurred $1.4 million of acquisition costs in connection with the transaction which have been expensed as incurred and included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Note 4 — Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Supplemental cash flow information is as follows (in thousands):
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities:
Value of shares issued in acquisition of Florida Chemical
$
52,711

$
—

Fair value of warrant liability reclassified to additional paid-in capital
—

13,973

Equipment acquired through capital leases
866

1,072

Exercise of stock options by common stock surrender
2,979

—

Supplemental cash payment information:
Interest paid
$
1,410

$
4,357

Income taxes paid
13,343

12,158

Note 5 — Revenue
The Company differentiates revenue and cost of revenue based on whether the source of revenue is attributable to products, rentals or services. Revenue and cost of revenue by source are as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Revenue:
Products
$
76,376

$
56,621

$
204,229

$
170,302

Rentals
15,375

16,374

46,794

51,420

Services
6,637

5,633

19,194

14,404

$
98,388

$
78,628

$
270,217

$
236,126

Cost of revenue:
Products
$
50,367

$
32,910

$
131,875

$
101,528

Rentals
6,868

7,806

17,666

23,312

Services
1,610

2,271

7,179

5,665

Depreciation
2,041

1,798

5,771

5,302

$
60,886

$
44,785

$
162,491

$
135,807


11
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

Note 6 — Inventories
Inventories are as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Raw materials
$
18,341

$
12,883

Work-in-process
1,779

342

Finished goods
54,229

34,704

Inventories
74,349

47,929

Less reserve for excess and obsolete inventory
(3,492
)
(2,752
)
Inventories, net
$
70,857

$
45,177

Note 7 — Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Land
$
5,078

$
1,442

Buildings and leasehold improvements
30,252

18,520

Machinery, equipment and rental tools
70,420

54,279

Equipment in progress
5,389

9,382

Furniture and fixtures
2,398

1,358

Transportation equipment
5,710

5,136

Computer equipment and software
5,880

6,743

Property and equipment
125,127

96,860

Less accumulated depreciation
(47,858
)
(40,361
)
Property and equipment, net
$
77,269

$
56,499

Depreciation expense, including expense recorded in cost of revenue, totale d $3.0 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, and $8.4 million and $6.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

12
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

Note 8 — Goodwill
Changes in the carrying value of goodwill for each reporting unit are as follows (in thousands):
Energy Chemical Technologies
Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies
Teledrift TM
Total
Balance at December 31, 2012
$
11,610

$
—

$
15,333

$
26,943

Add:
Acquisition of Florida Chemical
18,686

20,642

—

39,328

Balance at September 30, 2013
$
30,296

$
20,642

$
15,333

$
66,271

Prior to the acquisition of Florida Chemical, the Company had four reporting units, Energy Chemical Technologies, Drilling Tools, Teledrift, and Artificial Lift Technologies, of which only two, Energy Chemical Technologies and Teledrift, had an existing goodwill balance. For segment reporting purposes, the Teledrift reporting unit is consolidated within the Drilling Technologies segment.
During May 2013, as a result of the Florida Chemical acquisition, the Company recognized $39.3 million of goodwill. During the fair value assessment process, the Company identified two separate reporting units, one of which was consolidated within the Energy Chemical Technologies segment and the other which was identified as the Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies reporting unit and segment. The Company recognized $18.7 million of additional goodwill within the Energy Chemical Technologies reporting unit and $20.6 million of goodwill within the Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies reporting unit.

Note 9 — Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Cost
Accumulated Amortization
Cost
Accumulated Amortization
Finite lived intangible assets:




Patents and technology
$
19,000

$
2,924

$
4,314

$
1,654

Customer Lists
52,607

8,313

23,337

6,688

Non-compete agreements
—

—

402

402

Trademarks and brand names
7,191

1,889

6,151

1,513

Other
157

—

915

801

Total finite lived intangible assets acquired
78,955

13,126

35,119

11,058

Deferred financing costs
1,256

53

1,290

1,185

Total amortizable intangible assets
80,211

$
13,179

36,409

$
12,243

Indefinite lived intangible assets:


Trademarks and brand names
11,630

—

Total other intangibles assets
$
91,841

$
36,409

Carrying value:
Other intangible assets, net
$
78,662

$
24,166

With the acquisition of Florida Chemical on May 10, 2013, the Company recorded increases in finite lived intangible assets of $14.1 million in patents and technology, $29.3 million in customer lists and $1.0 million in trademarks and brand names. In addition, the Company recorded $11.6 million in indefinite lived trademarks and brand names. These acquired intangible assets are recorded at fair value as of the date of acquisition.

13

Finite lived intangible assets acquired are amortized on a straight-line basis over two to 20 years. Amortization of finite lived intangible assets totaled $1.3 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 , respectively, and $2.7 million and $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 , respectively.
Note 10 — Convertible Notes, Long-Term Debt and Credit Facility
Convertible notes and long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Convertible notes:
Convertible senior unsecured notes (2008 Notes)
$
—

$
5,188

Less discount on notes
—

(55
)
Convertible senior notes reported as current, net of discount
$
—

$
5,133

Long-term debt:
Term loan
$
47,619

$
25,000

Borrowings under revolving credit facility
27,377

—

Capital lease obligations
1,643

1,784

Total long-term debt
76,639

26,784

Less current portion of long-term debt
(35,529
)
(4,329
)
Long-term debt, less current portion
$
41,110

$
22,455

Credit Facility
On September 23, 2011, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Borrowers”) entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”). The Company may borrow under the Credit Facility for working capital, permitted acquisitions, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. Under terms of the Credit Facility, as amended on May 10, 2013 , the Company (a) may borrow up to $75 million under a revolving credit facility and (b) has borrowed $50 million under a term loan.
The Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the Company’s domestic personal property, including accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and other intangible assets. The Credit Facility contains customary representations, warranties, and both affirmative and negative covenants, including a financial covenant to maintain a consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to debt ratio of 1.10 to 1.00, a financial covenant to maintain a ratio of funded debt to adjusted EBITDA of not greater than 4.0 to 1.0, and an annual limit on capital expenditures of approximately $36 million . The Credit Facility restricts the payment of cash dividends on common stock. In the event of default, PNC Bank may accelerate the maturity date of any outstanding amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility.
Each of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries is fully obligated for Credit Facility indebtedness as a Borrower or as a guarantor pursuant to a guaranty dated September 23, 2011.
(a) Revolving Credit Facility
Under the revolving credit facility, the Company may borrow up to $75 million . This includes a sublimit of $10 million that may be used for letters of credit. The revolving credit facility is secured by substantially all the Company's domestic accounts receivable and inventory.
At September 30, 2013 , eligible accounts receivable and inventory securing the revolving credit facility provided availability of approximately $74.8 million under the revolving credit facility.
The interest rate on advances under the revolving credit facility varies based on the level of borrowing. Rates range (a) between PNC Bank's base lending rate plus 0.5% to 1.0% or (b) between the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.5% to 2.0% . PNC Bank's base lending rate was 3.25% at September 30, 2013 . The Company is required to pay a monthly facility fee of 0.25% on any unused amount under the commitment based on daily averages. At September 30, 2013 , $27.4 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility, with $7.4 million borrowed as base rate loans at an interest rate of 3.75% and $20.0 million borrowed as LIBOR loans at an interest rate of 1.69% .
Borrowing under the revolving credit agreement is classified as current debt as a result of the required lockbox arrangement and subjective acceleration clauses.

14
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

(b) Term Loan
The Company increased borrowing to $50 million under the term loan on May 10, 2013 . Monthly principal payments of $0.6 million are required. The unpaid balance of the term loan is due May 10, 2018 . Prepayments are permitted, and may be required in certain circumstances. Amounts repaid under the term loan may not be reborrowed. The term loan is secured by substantially all of the Company's domestic equipment and other intangible assets.
The interest rate on the term loan varies based on the level of borrowing under the revolving credit facility. Rates range (a) between PNC Bank's base lending rate plus 1.25% to 1.75% or (b) between LIBOR plus 2.25% to 2.75% . At September 30, 2013 , $47.6 million was outstanding under the term loan, with $1.6 million borrowed as base rate loans at an interest rate of 4.50% and $46.0 million borrowed as LIBOR loans at an interest rate of 2.44% .
Convertible Notes
The Company’s convertible notes have consisted of Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes (“2008 Notes”) and Convertible Senior Secured Notes (“2010 Notes”). On February 15, 2013, the Company repurchased the remaining $5.2 million of outstanding 2008 Notes. Following this repurchase, the Company no longer has any outstanding convertible senior notes.
In February 2008, the Company issued the 2008 Notes at par, in an aggregate principal amount of $115 million . The 2008 Notes had an interest rate of 5.25% and a scheduled maturity on February 15, 2028 . The Company accounted for both the liability and equity components of the 2008 Notes using the Company’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate of 11.5% . The Company used a five -year expected term for accretion of the associated debt discount which represented the period from inception until contractual call/put options contained in the 2008 Notes became exercisable on February 15, 2013 . The Company assumed an effective tax rate of 38% . At the date of issuance, the discount on the 2008 Notes was $27.8 million , with an associated deferred tax liability of $10.6 million .
In March 2010 the Company exchanged $40 million of 2008 Notes for aggregate consideration of $36 million of 2010 Notes and $2 million worth of shares of the Company’s common stock. The transaction was accounted for as an exchange of debt. Accordingly, no gain or loss was recognized and the difference between the debt exchanged and the net carrying value of the debt was recorded as a reduction of previously recognized debt discount. The remaining debt discount continued to be accreted over the same period, at an assumed rate of 9.9% , using the effective interest method. The Company capitalized commitment fees related to the Exchange Agreement that were amortized using the effective interest method over the period the convertible debt was expected to remain outstanding.
The 2010 Notes carried the same maturity date, interest rate, conversion rights, conversion rate, redemption rights and guarantees as the 2008 Notes. The only difference in terms was that the 2010 Notes were secured by a second priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets, while the 2008 Notes remained unsecured.
The convertible notes had a scheduled maturity on February 15, 2028 . On or after February 15, 2013, the Company could redeem, for cash, all or a portion of the convertible notes at a price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal amount, plus any associated accrued and unpaid interest. Holders of the convertible notes could require the Company to purchase all, or a portion, of the holder’s outstanding notes on each of February 15, 2013, February 15, 2018, and February 15, 2023. The convertible notes were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of the note holders, subject to certain contractual conditions. The conversion rate was 43.9560 shares per $1,000 principal note amount (equal to a conversion price of approximately $22.75 per share).
In May 2011, note holders exchanged $4.5 million of the 2008 Notes for 559,007 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon exchange, the Company recognized a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $1.1 million representing the difference between the reacquisition price of the debt over its net carrying amount including write-off of proportionate unaccreted discount and unamortized deferred financing costs.
On January 5, 2012, the Company repurchased all $36 million of the outstanding 2010 Notes for cash equal to 104.95% of the original principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. As a result of this transaction, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $5.4 million , consisting of a cash premium of $1.8 million and the write-off of unaccreted discount and unamortized deferred financing costs. Upon repurchase, the 2010 Notes were canceled and the second priority liens on the Company’s assets were released.
On June 25, 2012, the Company repurchased $15 million of outstanding 2008 Notes for cash equal to 102% of the original principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. As a result of this transaction, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of

15
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

debt of $1 million , consisting of the cash premium of $0.3 million and the write-off of unaccreted discount and unamortized deferred financing costs.
On December 31, 2012, the Company repurchased $50.3 million of outstanding 2008 Notes for cash equal to the original principal amount and a total premium of $0.3 million , plus accrued and unpaid interest. As a result of this transaction, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.9 million , consisting of the cash premium and the write-off of unaccreted discount and unamortized debt financing costs.
On February 15, 2013, the Company repurchased the remaining $5.2 million of outstanding 2008 Notes for cash equal to the original principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. These 2008 Notes were either tendered by the holder pursuant to the Company's tender offer or were redeemed by the Company pursuant to provisions of the indenture for the 2008 Notes. Following this repurchase, the Company no longer has any outstanding convertible senior notes.
Guarantees of the Convertible Notes
The convertible notes were guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. Flotek Industries, Inc., the parent company, is a holding company with no independent assets or operations. The guarantees provided by the Company’s subsidiaries were full and unconditional, and joint and several. Any subsidiaries of the Company that were not guarantors were deemed to be “minor” subsidiaries in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 3-10, “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.” The agreements governing the Company’s long-term indebtedness did not contain any significant restrictions on the ability of the Company, or any guarantor, to obtain funds from subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
Share Lending Agreement
Concurrent with the offering of the 2008 Notes, the Company entered into a share lending agreement (the “Share Lending Agreement”) with Bear, Stearns International Limited which was subsequently acquired and became an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Company (the “Borrower”). In accordance with the Share Lending Agreement, the Company loaned 3.8 million shares of its common stock (the “Borrowed Shares”) to the Borrower for a period commencing February 11, 2008 and ending on the earlier of February 15, 2028 or the date the 2008 Notes were paid. The Borrower was permitted to use the Borrowed Shares only for the purpose of directly or indirectly facilitating the sale of the 2008 Notes and for the establishment of hedge positions by holders of the 2008 Notes. The Company did not require collateral to mitigate any inherent or associated risk of the Share Lending Agreement.
The Company did not receive any proceeds for the Borrowed Shares, but did receive a nominal loan fee of $0.0001 for each share loaned. The Borrower retained all proceeds from sales of Borrowed Shares pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement. Upon conversion or replacement of the 2008 Notes, the number of Borrowed Shares proportionate to the converted or repaid notes were to be returned to the Company. The Borrowed Shares were issued and outstanding for corporate law purposes. Accordingly, holders of Borrowed Shares possessed all of the rights of a holder of the Company’s outstanding shares, including the right to vote the shares on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and the right to receive any dividends or other distributions declared or paid on outstanding shares of common stock. Under the Share Lending Agreement, the Borrower agreed to pay to the Company, within one business day after a payment date, an amount equal to any cash dividends that the Company paid on the Borrowed Shares, and to pay or deliver to the Company, upon termination of the loan of Borrowed Shares, any other distribution, in liquidation or otherwise, that the Company made on the Borrowed Shares.
To the extent the Borrowed Shares loaned under the Share Lending Agreement were not sold or returned to the Company, the Borrower agreed to not vote any borrowed shares of which the Borrower was the owner of record. The Borrower also agreed, under the Share Lending Agreement, to not transfer or dispose of any borrowed shares unless such transfer or disposition was pursuant to a registration statement that was effective under the Securities Act. Investors that purchased shares from the Borrower, and all subsequent transferees of such purchasers, were entitled to the same voting rights, with respect to owned shares, as any other holder of common stock.
The Company valued the share lending arrangement at $0.5 million at the date of issuance. The corresponding fair value was recognized as a debt issuance cost and was amortized to interest expense through the earliest put date of the related debt, February 15, 2013.
During June 2012 and November 2011, the Borrower returned 659,340 shares and 701,102 shares, respectively, of the Company’s borrowed common stock. On January 22, 2013, the remaining 2,439,558 shares of the Company's common stock held by J.P. Morgan Markets Limited were returned to the Company. No consideration was paid by the Company for the return of the Borrowed Shares. The Share Lending Agreement has been terminated.

16
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

Shares that had been loaned under the Share Lending Agreement were not considered outstanding for the purpose of computing and reporting earnings per share.
Capital Lease Obligations
The Company leases equipment and vehicles under capital leases. At September 30, 2013 , the Company had $1.6 million of capital lease obligations.
Note 11 — Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income, adjusted for the effect of assumed conversion of convertible notes, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding combined with dilutive common share equivalents outstanding, if the effect is dilutive.
In connection with the sale of the 2008 Notes, the Company entered into a Share Lending Agreement for 3.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 10). Contractual undertakings of the Borrower had the effect of substantially eliminating the economic dilution that otherwise would result from the issuance of the Borrowed Shares, and all shares outstanding under the Share Lending Agreement were contractually obligated to be returned to the Company. As a result, shares loaned under the Share Lending Agreement were not considered outstanding for the purpose of computing and reporting earnings per share. The Share Lending Agreement was terminated on January 22, 2013 upon the return of all Borrowed Shares to the Company.
On February 15, 2013, the Company repurchased the remaining $5.2 million of outstanding 2008 Notes for cash. Following this repurchase, the Company no longer has any outstanding convertible senior notes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 , the Company’s convertible notes were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share, as inclusion was anti-dilutive. In addition, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, approximately 0.1 million stock options with an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the Company’s common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share.
Basic and diluted earnings per common share are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Net income - Basic
$
8,968

$
9,806

$
25,173

$
26,590

Impact of assumed conversions:
Interest on convertible notes
—

414

—

—

Net income - Diluted
$
8,968

$
10,220

$
25,173

$
26,590

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic
52,742

48,384

50,819

48,054

Assumed conversions:
Incremental common shares from warrants
1,365

1,493

1,404

1,617

Incremental common shares from stock options
1,134

1,003

1,143

986

Incremental common shares from restricted stock units
76

158

41

80

Incremental common shares from convertible senior notes
—

2,440

—

—

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted
55,317

53,478

53,407

50,737

Basic earnings per common share
$
0.17

$
0.20

$
0.50

$
0.55

Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.16

$
0.19

$
0.47

$
0.52

Note 12 — Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received for selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company categorizes financial assets and liabilities into the three levels

17
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

of the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value and bases categorization within the hierarchy on the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement.
•
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
•
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and
•
Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity or that are based on the reporting entity’s assumptions about the inputs.
Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Company had no liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 . There were no transfers in or out of either Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 . During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 , there were no transfers in or out of the Level 3 hierarchy.
Changes in Level 3 liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
Nine months ended
September 30, 2013
Year ended
December 31, 2012
Balance, beginning of period
$
—

$
16,622

Fair value adjustments, net
—

(2,649
)
Reclassification to additional paid-in capital
—

(13,973
)
Net transfers in/(out)
—

—

Balance, end of period
$
—

$
—

On June 14, 2012, provisions in the Company’s Exercisable and Contingent Warrant Certificates were amended to eliminate anti-dilution price adjustment provisions and remove cash settlement provisions of a change of control event. Upon amendment, the warrants met the requirements for classification as equity. All fluctuations in the fair value of the warrant liability prior to June 2012 were recognized as non-cash income or expense items within the statement of operations. The fair value accounting methodology for the warrant liability is no longer required following the contractual amendment.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s marketable securities, convertible notes and long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
Marketable securities
$
220

$
220

$
—

$
—

2008 Notes (1)
—

—

5,133

5,163

Term loan
47,619

47,619

25,000

25,000

Borrowings under revolving credit facility
27,377

27,377

—

—

Capital lease obligations
1,643

1,601

1,784

1,736

(1) The carrying value of the 2008 Notes represents the discounted debt component only, while the fair value of the Notes is based on the market value of the respective notes, including convertible equity features.
The estimated fair value of the 2008 Notes is based upon quoted market prices. The carrying value of the term loan and borrowings under the revolving credit facility approximate their fair value because the interest rates are variable. The fair value of capital lease obligations is based on recent lease rates adjusted for a risk premium.


18
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED


Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company's non-financial assets, including property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustment in certain circumstances. No impairment of any of these assets was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 .
Note 13 — Income Taxes
The Company’s corporate organizational structure requires the filing of two separate consolidated U.S. Federal income tax returns. Taxable income of one group cannot be offset by tax attributes, including net operating losses, of the other group.
A reconciliation of the effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate is as follows:
Three months ended September 30,

Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Federal statutory tax rate
35.0
%
35.0
%
35.0
%
35.0
%
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
3.6

1.1

3.2

2.1

Change in valuation allowance
0.2

(6.9
)
(0.1
)
(5.1
)
Warrant liability fair value adjustment
—

(2.3
)
—

(1.9
)
Domestic production activities deduction
(2.3
)
(2.8
)
(2.4
)
(2.5
)
Other
2.1

(1.0
)
1.0

(0.3
)
Effective income tax rate
38.6
%
23.1
%
36.7
%
27.3
%
Fluctuations in effective tax rates were historically impacted by non-cash changes in the fair value of the Company’s warrant liability, permanent tax differences with no associated income tax impact, and existing deferred tax asset valuation allowances.
The change in the net deferred tax asset (liability) relates primarily to an increase in deferred tax liabilities from the acquisition of Florida Chemical. Deferred taxes are presented in the balance sheets as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Current deferred tax assets
$
1,591

$
1,274

Non-current deferred tax assets
14,763

16,045

Non-current deferred tax liabilities
(25,491
)
(751
)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
$
(9,137
)
$
16,568

As part of its acquisition assessment, the Company recognized a deferred tax asset related to Florida Chemical's allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory obsolescence reserve expected to be realized in the future. In addition, the Company recorded a deferred tax liability for the difference between the assigned fair values of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the tax bases of those assets.
Note 14 — Convertible Preferred Stock and Stock Warrants
In August 2009, the Company sold 16,000 units (the “Units”), consisting of preferred stock and warrants for $1,000 per Unit. Each Unit consisted of one share of Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock (“Convertible Preferred Stock”), detachable warrants to purchase up to 155 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $2.31 per share (“Exercisable Warrants”) and detachable contingent warrants to purchase up to 500 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $2.45 per share (“Contingent Warrants”).
The gross proceeds from issuance of the Units were allocated, at the date of the transaction, based upon the preferred stock and warrants relative fair values. The Company obtained third-party valuations to assist in quantifying the relative fair value of the Unit's debt and equity components. The fair value of the warrants was determined with the Black-Scholes option-pricing model assuming a five -year term, a volatility rate of 54% , a risk-free rate of return of 2.7% , and an assumed dividend rate of zero . The fair value of the preferred stock component was determined based upon a valuation of the beneficial conversion right and the host contract. The fair value of the beneficial conversion right was estimated based upon a Monte Carlo simulation of the Company’s possible future stock price to assess the likelihood of conversion. Due to a lack of comparable transactions by companies with similar credit ratings, the value of the host contract was determined by applying a risk-adjusted rate of return to the annual dividend. At the date of the transaction, the Company recorded approximately 68% of the proceeds or $10.8 million (net of the discount recognized upon the allocation of proceeds to the detachable warrants) as preferred stock in stockholders' equity. The fair value

19
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

of the detachable warrants was assessed at $5.2 million and recorded as a warrant liability. The Company determined that the conversion option embedded within the preferred stock had intrinsic value beneficial to the holders of the preferred stock. The intrinsic value was determined to be $5.2 million and was recorded as a beneficial conversion discount with an offset to additional paid-in capital at the date of the transaction. The preferred stock conversion period was estimated to be thirty-six months based upon an evaluation of the conversion options.
Preferred Stock
Each share of Convertible Preferred Stock was convertible at any time, at the holder’s option, into 434.782 shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion rate represented an equivalent conversion price of approximately $2.30 per share of common stock.
Each share of Convertible Preferred Stock had a liquidation preference of $1,000 . Dividends accrued at a rate of 15% of the liquidation preference per year and accumulated, if not paid quarterly. Subsequent to February 11, 2010, the Company had the ability to convert the preferred shares into common shares if the closing price of the common stock met certain price criteria. In the event any Convertible Preferred Stock was converted, the Company was obligated to pay an amount, in cash or common stock, equal to eight quarterly dividend payments less any dividends previously paid.
On January 6, 2011, the Company paid all accumulated and unpaid dividends on the outstanding shares of Convertible Preferred Stock in shares of the Company’s common stock. The payment, at an annual rate of 15% of the liquidation preference, covered the period from issuance, August 12, 2009, through December 31, 2010. Dividends per share were paid in shares of commons stock valued at $4.81 , based upon the prior ten business day volume-weighted average price per share. Fractional shares were paid in cash.
On February 4, 2011, the Company exercised its contractual right to mandatorily convert all outstanding shares of Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock at the prevailing conversion rate of 434.782 shares of common stock for each share of preferred stock. The Company issued 4,871,719 shares of common stock for preferred share conversions during 2011, including those mandatorily converted. Holders of preferred shares subject to mandatory conversion were entitled to eight quarterly dividend payments. On February 4, 2011, dividends per share of $91.67 were paid in shares of common stock valued at $6.63 , based upon the prior ten business day volume-weighted average price per share. Fractional shares were paid in cash.
Stock Warrants
Exercisable Warrants were exercisable upon issuance and expire August 12, 2014 , if not exercised. Contingent Warrants became exercisable on November 9, 2009, and expire November 9, 2014 , if not exercised. Prior to June 14, 2012, the warrants contained anti-dilution price protection in the event the Company issued shares of common stock or securities exercisable for, or convertible into, common stock at a price per share less than the warrants’ exercise price. In accordance with these contractual anti-dilution price adjustment provisions, the warrants were re-priced as a result of a payment of a portion of the initial and deferred commitment fees related to the Company’s term loan with common stock on March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010.
Due to the anti-dilution price adjustment provisions established at the issuance date, the warrants were deemed to be a liability and were recorded at fair value at the date of issuance. The warrant liability was adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period through the statement of operations during the period the anti-dilution price adjustment provisions were in effect. On June 14, 2012, contractual provisions within the Company’s Exercisable and Contingent Warrant agreements were modified to eliminate the anti-dilution price adjustment provisions of the warrants and remove the cash settlement provisions in the event of a change of control. The amended warrants now qualify to be classified as equity. Accordingly, the Company revalued the warrants as of June 14, 2012, the date of contractual amendment. The change in fair value of the warrant liability compared to the fair value on December 31, 2011, $2.6 million , was recognized in income during 2012. The revalued warrant liability of $14.0 million was reclassified to additional-paid-in-capital on June 14, 2012. There will no longer be fair value adjustments as long as the warrants continue to meet the criteria for equity classification.
The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the warrant liability for each reporting period. On June 14, 2012, the date the warrants were amended, inputs into the fair value calculation included the actual remaining term of the warrants, a volatility rate of 58.1% , a risk-free rate of return of 0.36% , and an assumed dividend rate of zero .
At September 30, 2013 , Exercisable and Contingent Warrants to purchase up to 1,277,250 shares of common stock at $1.21 per share remain outstanding.

20
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

Note 15 — Business Segment, Geographic and Major Customer Information
Segment Information
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that is regularly evaluated by chief operating decision-makers in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. With its acquisition of Florida Chemical Company, Inc. on May 10, 2013 (see Note 3), the Company added operations in a new segment, Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies (previously referred to as Non-energy Chemical Technologies). The operations of the Company are now categorized into four reportable segments: Energy Chemical Technologies (previously referred to as Chemical Technologies), Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies, Drilling Technologies and Artificial Lift Technologies.

•
Energy Chemical Technologies designs, develops, manufactures, packages and markets specialty chemicals, some of which hold patent protection, used in oil and gas well cementing, stimulation, acidizing, drilling and production. Activities in this segment also include construction and management of automated material handling facilities and management of loading facilities and blending operations for oilfield services companies.

•
Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies designs, develops and manufactures products that are sold to companies in the flavor and fragrance industry and the specialty chemical industry. These technologies are used by beverage and food companies, fragrance companies, and companies providing household and industrial cleaning products.

•
Drilling Technologies rents, sells, inspects, manufactures and markets down-hole drilling equipment used in energy, mining, water well and industrial drilling activities.
•
Artificial Lift Technologies assembles and markets artificial lift equipment, including the Petrovalve™ product line of rod pump components, electric submersible pumps, gas separators, valves and services that support natural gas, oil and coal bed methane production activities.
The Company evaluates performance based upon a variety of criteria. The primary financial measure is segment operating income. Various functions, including certain sales and marketing activities and general and administrative activities, are provided centrally by the corporate office. Costs associated with corporate office functions, other corporate income and expense items, and income tax provisions (benefits), are not allocated to reportable segments.
Summarized financial information of the reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):
As of and for the three months ended September 30,
Energy Chemical Technologies
Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies
Drilling Technologies
Artificial Lift Technologies
Corporate and
Other
Total
2013
Net revenue from external customers
$
51,670

$
15,292

$
27,569

$
3,857

$
—

$
98,388

Gross margin
21,849

3,588

10,821

1,244

—

37,502

Income (loss) from operations
16,247

2,301

4,309

769

(8,539
)
15,087

Depreciation and amortization
932

382

2,438

60

213

4,025

Total assets
121,876

97,129

136,832

16,542

8,600

380,979

Capital expenditures
161

165

1,596

225

328

2,475

2012
Net revenue from external customers
$
44,189

$
—

$
30,424

$
4,015

$
—

$
78,628

Gross margin
20,774

—

11,252

1,817

—

33,843

Income (loss) from operations
16,530

—

5,329

1,384

(8,650
)
14,593

Depreciation and amortization
460

—

2,277

54

176

2,967

Total assets
53,076

—

122,533

10,563

31,963

218,135

Capital expenditures
733

—

2,384

5

2,643

5,765


21
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

As of and for the nine months ended September 30,
Energy Chemical Technologies
Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies
Drilling Technologies
Artificial Lift Technologies
Corporate and
Other
Total
2013
Net revenue from external customers
$
144,029

$
27,967

$
86,268

$
11,953

$
—

$
270,217

Gross margin
61,548

7,281

34,622

4,275

—

107,726

Income (loss) from operations
45,300

4,648

15,510

2,712

(27,004
)
41,166

Depreciation and amortization
2,201

634

7,215

181

717

10,948

Total assets
121,876

97,129

136,832

16,542

8,600

380,979

Capital expenditures
3,077

165

4,066

1,669

1,008

9,985

2012
Net revenue from external customers
$
137,827

$
—

$
89,214

$
9,085

$
—

$
236,126

Gross margin
61,856

—

34,764

3,699

—

100,319

Income (loss) from operations
50,005

—

17,320

2,284

(22,679
)
46,930

Depreciation and amortization
1,321

—

6,738

148

261

8,468

Total assets
53,076

—

122,533

10,563

31,963

218,135

Capital expenditures
2,896

—

7,724

73

4,550

15,243

Geographic Information
Revenue by country is based on the location where services are provided and products are sold. No individual country other than the United States (“U.S.”) accounted for more than 10% of revenue. Revenue by geographic location is as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
U.S.
$
84,640

$
68,512

$
234,151

$
206,394

Other countries
13,748

10,116

36,066

29,732

Total
$
98,388

$
78,628

$
270,217

$
236,126

Long-lived assets held in countries other than the U.S. are not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
Major Customers
Revenue from major customers, as a percentage of consolidated revenue, is as follows:
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Customer A
15.5
%
16.6
%
16.6
%
15.2
%
Customer B
*

*

*

10.4
%
Customer C
*

12.1
%
*

*

* This customer did not account for more than 10% of revenue.
Over 97% of the revenue from major customers was for sales within the Energy Chemical Technologies segment.

22
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

Note 16 — Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company is subject to routine litigation and other claims that arise in the normal course of business. Management is not aware of any pending or threatened lawsuits or proceedings that are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Representation Agreements
In February 2011, the Company entered into two separate representation agreements with Basin Supply Corporation (“Basin Supply”), a multinational, energy industry-focused supply chain management company, to market certain of the Company’s specialty chemicals and down-hole drilling products and services within various international markets, including the Middle East, Africa, Latin America and the former Soviet Union. Both agreements are effective through December 31, 2015. Under each agreement, Basin Supply is also eligible to receive warrants to purchase Flotek common stock (at an exercise price of 125% of the price of Flotek's common stock on the grant date) upon exceeding contractually defined annual base and “stretch” sales targets. The number of warrants that could be issued under the terms of each of the agreements is 100,000 per year during 2013 and 2014.
Concentrations and Credit Risk
The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from the oil and gas industry. Customers include major integrated oil and natural gas companies, independent oil and natural gas companies, pressure pumping service companies and state-owned national oil companies. This concentration of customers in one industry increases credit and business risks.
Certain mud-motor inventory parts in the Drilling Technologies segment and stock parts in the Artificial Lift Technologies segment are primarily sourced from China.
The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk within trade accounts receivable as the Company does not generally require collateral as support for trade receivables. In addition, the majority of the Company’s cash is maintained at one major financial institution and balances often exceed insurable amounts.
Non-binding Letter of Intent
In July 2013, the Company entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent to acquire Eclipse IOR Services, LLC, a leading provider of enhanced recovery technologies for oil and natural gas producers. Subject to successful completion of due diligence, total consideration is expected to be approximately $6.5 million .

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”), and in particular, Part I, Item 2 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-5, of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but instead represent the Company’s current assumptions and beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside the Company’s control. Such statements include estimates, projections, and statements related to Flotek Industries, Inc.’s (“Flotek” or the “Company”) business plan, objectives, expected operating results and assumptions upon which those statements are based. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report are based on information available as of the date of this Quarterly Report.
The forward-looking statements relate to future industry trends and economic conditions, forecast performance or results of current and future initiatives and the outcome of contingencies and other uncertainties that may have a significant impact on the Company’s business, future operating results and liquidity. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by words including, but not limited to, “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “forecast,” “project” and similar expressions, or future-tense or conditional constructions such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” etc. The Company cautions that these statements are merely predictions, and are not to be considered guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties that can cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, anticipated or implied.
A detailed discussion of potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from forward-looking statements is included in Part I, Item 1A - “Risk Factors” of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended

23

December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) and periodically in subsequent reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company has no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events, except as required by law.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements and the related notes thereto, as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (“2012 Annual Report”). Phrases such as “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Flotek Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Executive Summary
Flotek is a diversified, technology-driven company that develops and supplies oilfield products, services and equipment to the oil, gas and mining industries, and high value compounds to companies that make cleaning products, cosmetics, food and beverages and other products that are sold in the consumer and industrial markets.
The Company’s oilfield businesses include specialty chemicals and logistics, down-hole drilling tools and down-hole production-related tools. Flotek’s technologies enable customers to drill wells more efficiently, increase well production and decrease well operating costs. The Company also provides automated bulk material handling, loading facilities and blending capabilities. Through its acquisition of Florida Chemical Company (See Note 3 - Acquisition of Florida Chemical Company, hereafter, “Florida Chemical”) in May 2013, Flotek sources citrus oil domestically and internationally and is the largest processor of citrus oil in the world. Products produced from processed citrus oil include (1) high value compounds used as additives by companies in the flavors and fragrances markets and (2) environmentally friendly chemicals for use in numerous industries around the world, specifically oil and gas (“O&G”) industries. The Company has combined the research efforts of the newly acquired business with its previously existing organic R&D effort to strengthen its focus on developing environmentally responsible products for the oil and gas industry and other markets.
Flotek operates in over 20 domestic and international markets, including the Gulf Coast, Southwest, Rocky Mountains, Northeastern and Mid-Continental regions of the United States (the “U.S.”), Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America, Europe, Africa, Middle East, Australia and Asia-Pacific. Customers include major integrated O&G companies, oilfield services companies, independent O&G companies, pressure-pumping service companies, national and state-owned oil companies, and international supply chain management companies. As a result of its Florida Chemical acquisition, customers now also include non-energy-related citrus oil users, including household and commercial cleaning product companies, fragrance and cosmetic companies, and food manufacturing companies.
The operations of the Company are categorized into four reportable segments: Energy Chemical Technologies (formerly known as “Chemical Technologies,”), Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies (formerly known as “Non-Energy Chemical Technologies,”), Drilling Technologies and Artificial Lift Technologies.

•
Energy Chemical Technologies designs, develops, manufactures, packages and markets specialty chemicals used in O&G well cementing, stimulation, acidizing, drilling and production. Activities in this segment also include construction and management of automated material handling facilities and management of loading facilities and blending operations for oilfield services companies.

•
Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies designs, develops and manufactures products that are sold to companies in the flavor and fragrance industries and specialty chemical industry. These technologies are used by beverage and food companies, fragrance companies, and companies providing household and industrial cleaning products.

•
Drilling Technologies rents, sells, inspects, manufactures and markets down-hole drilling equipment used in energy, mining, water well and industrial drilling activities.

•
Artificial Lift Technologies assembles and markets artificial lift equipment, including the Petrovalve product line of rod pump components, electric submersible pumps, gas separators, valves and services that support natural gas, oil and coal bed methane production activities.
Market Conditions
The Company’s success is sensitive to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, drilling activity, customer demand for its advanced technology products, market prices for raw materials and governmental actions.

24

Drilling activity levels are influenced by a number of factors, including the number of rigs in operation, the geographical areas of rig activity, and drill rig efficiency (rig days required per well). Additional factors that influence the level of drilling activity include:
•
Historical, current, and anticipated future O&G prices,
•
Federal, State and local governmental actions that may encourage or discourage drilling activity,
•
Customers’ strategies relative to capital funds allocations,
•
Weather conditions, and
•
Technological changes to drilling methods and economics.
Historical North American drilling activity is reflected in “TABLE A” below:
Customers’ demand for advanced technology products and services provided by the Company are dependent on their recognition of the value of:
•
Chemistries that improve the economics of their O&G operations,
•
Drilling products that improve drilling operations and efficiencies, and
•
Chemistries that are economically viable, socially responsible and ecologically sound.
Market prices for citrus oils can be influenced by:
•
Historical, current, and anticipated future production levels of the global citrus (primarily orange) crop,
•
Weather related risks, and
•
Health and condition of citrus trees (e.g., disease and pests).
Governmental actions may restrict the future use of hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to, the following industrial applications:
•
O&G drilling and completion operations,
•
O&G production operations, and
•
Non-O&G industrial solvents.

TABLE A
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
% Change

2013
2012
% Change
North American Average Active Drilling Rigs
U.S.
1,770

1,906

(7.1
)%
1,763

1,955

(9.8
)%
Canada
350

325

7.7
%
349

362

(3.6
)%
Total Average North American Drilling Rigs
2,120

2,231

(5.0
)%
2,112

2,317

(8.8
)%
U.S. Average Active Drilling Rigs by Type
Vertical
436

531

(17.9
)%
443

567

(21.9
)%
Horizontal
1,073

1,153

(6.9
)%
1,096

1,164

(5.8
)%
Directional
261

222

17.6
%
224

224

—
%
Total Average U.S. Drilling Rigs by Type
1,770

1,906

(7.1
)%
1,763

1,955

(9.8
)%
Oil vs. Natural Gas Average North American Drilling Rigs
Oil
1,609

1,658

(3.0
)%
1,610

1,611

(0.1
)%
Natural Gas
511

573

(10.8
)%
502

706

(28.9
)%
Total Average Oil vs Natural Gas Drilling Rigs
2,120

2,231

(5.0
)%
2,112

2,317

(8.8
)%
U.S. Average Wells Drilled per Quarter per Rig
5.37

5.07

5.9
%
5.21

4.92

5.9
%
Source: Rig and well counts are per Baker Hughes, Inc. ( www.bakerhughes.com ). Rig counts are the averages of the weekly rig count activity. Well counts are the number of wells drilled in the reporting period divided by the average weekly rig count.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, total North American active drilling rig count saw a decrease when compared to the comparable periods of 2012, primarily in natural gas drilling rigs. Publicly available data from Baker Hughes indicates that rigs are becoming more efficient, drilling more wells per quarter per rig as various drilling and support technology efficiencies make their way into the market. Although overall U.S. rig activity decreased 7.1% and 9.8% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 2012, respectively, the number of wells drilled per rig per quarter increased from

25

5.07 and 4.92 for the three months and nine months ending September 30, 2012 to 5.37 and 5.21 for the same periods in 2013, respectively.
U.S. drilling rigs by type showed a modest shift with decreases ranging from 5.8% to 6.9% in drilling rig activity by horizontal drilling rigs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 periods when compared to the comparable periods of 2012, a decrease of 17.9% and 21.9% in vertical drilling rig activity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 , respectively, when compared to the 2012 periods, and an increase in directional drilling rigs for the three months ended September 30, 2013 of 17.6% when compared to 2012.
Average North American oil drilling rig activity decreased by 3.0% and 0.1% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 , respectively, when compared to the same periods of 2012. North American natural gas drilling rigs have decreased by 10.8% and 28.9% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 , respectively, compared to the same periods of 2012.
Company Outlook
Future economic conditions are expected to remain consistent with recent market conditions. Increases in drilling rig operating efficiencies noted above are resulting in pricing pressure on rig-based operations. To some extent, those pressures impact drilling suppliers such as Flotek, especially in our Drilling Technologies segment. Our tools are being leased for a smaller amount of time per well drilled, which is partially offset by the expansion in the number of wells being drilled per quarter per rig.
The Company is expanding its Energy Chemical Technologies production capacity in response to increasing customer demand. In addition, the Company is continuing to expand Drilling Technologies' product offerings. The Company continues to pursue and develop new and existing market opportunities associated with the Company’s specialty chemical and drilling technology products. Capital expenditures, exclusive of acquisitions, totaled $10.0 million and $15.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company pursues acquisitions when strategic opportunities arise.
The Company continues to pursue selected strategic relationships, both domestically and internationally, to expand its business:

•
In March 2013, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent with an Affiliate of Gulf Energy, LLC, a leading Oman-based oil and gas concern, to construct an advanced oilfield chemistry production facility and state-of-the-art R&D organization to address the growing need for advanced oilfield chemistries in the Middle East and North Africa.

•
In July 2013, the Company entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent to acquire Eclipse IOR Services, LLC, a leading provider of enhanced recovery technologies for O&G producers.

•
In August 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with AlMansoori Production Service Company of Abu Dhabi in the UAE to provide certain chemistry technologies.
The Company believes governmental reaction to constituents’ environmental concerns regarding the hydraulic fracturing process and the use of hazardous chemicals in O&G operations could work to its advantage. These environmental concerns favor our chemistries as economical replacements for more hazardous chemicals currently in use in many drilling and producing operations. California and Colorado have grass-roots, citizen movements that are aimed specifically at “greening” the hydraulic fracturing process, and management believes it is likely these environmental concerns/reactions will broaden to other states in the quarters to come.
The outlook for the Company’s consumer and industrial chemistries will be driven by availability and demand for citrus oils and other bio-based raw materials. Current crop expectations for the fourth quarter of 2013 and beyond are sufficient to meet the Company’s needs to supply its flavor and fragrance business as well as the industrial markets. However, market price volatility will likely result in revenue and margin fluctuations from quarter to quarter.
The Company works to maintain a portfolio of products which are adaptable to meet our customers’ demands for customized products for the various drilling and producing environments in which they operate. The Company's commitment to research and development ("R&D") permits the Company to remain responsive to increased demand and continued growth. The Company remains committed to continued development of its product technologies and believes the new growth of its business through the recent acquisition of Florida Chemical will strategically advance its existing assets and technologies to better serve our customers' needs. The Company believes that it is well-positioned to respond to increased demand for the Company's suite of hydrocarbon stimulation and completion products, particularly the Company's Complex nano-Fluid Chemistries. In addition, the Company anticipates continued strong demand for its Teledrift Pro-series tool product lines and its recently introduced Stemulator™ tool.

26

Changes to global geo-political and economic events could have an impact, either positive or negative, on the Company’s business. In the event of significant adverse changes to the demand for O&G production, the market conditions affecting the Company could change quickly and materially. Should such adverse changes to market conditions occur, management believes the Company has adequate liquidity to withstand the impact of such changes. In addition, management believes the Company is well-positioned to take advantage of significant increases in demand for its products should market conditions improve dramatically in the near term.
Consolidated Results of Operations (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Revenue
$
98,388

$
78,628

$
270,217

$
236,126

Cost of revenue
60,886

44,785

162,491

135,807

Gross margin
37,502

33,843

107,726

100,319

Gross margin %
38.1
%
43.0
%
39.9
%
42.5
%
Selling, general and administrative costs
19,542

17,171

58,640

47,860

Selling, general and administrative costs %
19.9
%
21.8
%
21.7
%
20.3
%
Depreciation and amortization
2,038

1,170

5,231

3,166

Research and development
835

909

2,689

2,363

Income from operations
15,087

14,593

41,166

46,930

Income from operations %
15.3
%
18.6
%
15.2
%
19.9
%
Loss on extinguishment of debt
—

—

—

(6,386
)
Change in fair value of warrant liability
—

—

—

2,649

Interest and other expense, net
(471
)
(1,847
)
(1,378
)
(6,612
)
Income before income taxes
14,616

12,746

39,788

36,581

Income tax expense
(5,648
)
(2,940
)
(14,615
)
(9,991
)
Net income
$
8,968

$
9,806

$
25,173

$
26,590

Net income %
9.1
%
12.5
%
9.3
%
11.3
%

Consolidated Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Consolidated revenue for the third quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 increased $19.8 million , or 25.1% , and $34.1 million , or 14.4% , respectively, relative to the comparable periods of 2012 . The increase in revenue for both periods was primarily due to the acquisition of Florida Chemical, contributing incremental revenue of $18.6 million during the quarter and $33.1 million for the nine month period. Excluding the impact of the acquisition, revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 increased by $1.2 million or 1.5% to $79.8 million. Excluding the impact of the acquisition, year to date revenue increased $1.0 million or 0.4% when compared with the year to date 2012 revenue while the total average North American drilling rig count decreased by 8.8%. Revenue increases in the Energy Chemical Technologies segment were partially offset by revenue declines in the Drilling Technologies segment.
Consolidated gross margin for the quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 increased $3.7 million , or 10.8% , and $7.4 million , or 7.4% , respectively, relative to comparable periods of 2012 . The increase in gross margin compared to the third quarter and year to date periods was primarily due to the increase in revenue. Gross margin percentage declined in both quarterly and year over year comparisons. The decline in gross margin percentage was primarily attributable to portfolio mix resulting from the inclusion of Florida Chemical in 2013 results and proportionately higher sales of nonproprietary products in the Energy Chemical Technologies segment, partially offset by supply chain benefits from the Florida Chemical acquisition and proportionately higher sales of technology tools in the Drilling Technologies segment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) are not directly attributable to products sold or services provided. SG&A for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 increased by $2.4 million , or 13.8% compared to the same period of 2012. Excluding the incremental SG&A costs of the Florida Chemical business acquired, SG&A costs increased $0.2 million, or 1.2% compared

27

to the same period of 2012. SG&A costs as a percentage of revenue declined from 21.8% to 19.9% in the three months ended September 30, 2013 versus the same period of 2012 as revenues grew significantly faster than SG&A costs.
SG&A costs for the year to date period ended September 30, 2013 increased by $10.8 million , or 22.5% compared to the same period of 2012. Excluding the incremental SG&A costs of the Florida Chemical business acquired, SG&A costs increased $6.9 million primarily due to costs incurred in 2013 related to executive severance ($1.0 million), implementation of the Company's new ERP system ($0.8 million), and expenses related to the pursuit of acquisitions and major initiatives in international markets ($1.6 million). Excluding these items and the incremental SG&A costs of the Florida Chemical business, SG&A costs increased $3.4 million or 7.1% primarily due to increases in headcount, general insurance, and travel related costs.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 increased by $0.9 million or 74.2% , and $2.1 million or 65.2% relative to comparable periods of 2012 , respectively. This increase for the quarter ($0.8 million) and year to date ($1.4 million) periods was primarily attributable to incremental depreciation and amortization of assets recognized as part of the acquisition of Florida Chemical.
R&D expense decreased $0.1 million or 8.1% for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and increased $0.3 million or 13.8% for the year to date period ended September 30, 2013 , respectively, over the comparable periods of 2012. The increase in R&D is primarily attributable to new product development, and Flotek's commitment to remaining responsive to increased demand and continued growth of our existing product lines. Management remains committed to R&D investment.
Interest and other expense f or the quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 decreased by $1.4 million , or 74.5% , and $5.2 million , or 79.2% relative to comparable periods of 2012 , respectively. The decline in interes t expense was primarily due to the repayment of the Company's convertible notes of $50.3 million at the end of the fourth quarter of 2012 and $5.2 million during the first quarter of 2013.
The Company recorded an income tax provision of $5.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 , yielding an effective tax rate of 38.6% , compared to an income tax provision of $2.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 , yielding an effective tax rate of 23.1% . The income tax provision was $14.6 million yielding an effective tax rate of 36.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 , compared to an income tax provision of $10.0 million reflecting an effective tax rate of 27.3% for the comparable period in 2012 . Fluctuations in effective tax rates were historically impacted by non-cash changes in the fair value of the Company’s warrant liability, permanent tax differences with no associated income tax impact, and existing deferred tax asset valuation allowances.
Results by Segment
Energy Chemical Technologies (dollars in thousands)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Revenue
$
51,670

$
44,189

$
144,029

$
137,827

Gross margin
21,849

20,774

61,548

61,856

Gross margin %
42.3
%
47.0
%
42.7
%
44.9
%
Income from operations
16,247

16,530

45,300

50,005

Income from operations %
31.4
%
37.4
%
31.5
%
36.3
%
Energy Chemical Technologies Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Energy Chemical Technologies revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 increased $7.5 million , or 16.9% , relative to the comparable period of 2012 . Excluding the incremental revenue impact of the Florida Chemical acquisition of $3.3 million, revenue increased $4.2 million or 9.4% for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period of 2012. Increased sales of stimulation chemical additives accounted for the majority of the revenue increase for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 relative to the comparable period of 2012. Energy Chemical Technologies revenue for year to date ended September 30, 2013 increased $6.2 million , or 4.5% , relative to the comparable period of 2012 . Excluding the incremental revenue impact of the Florida Chemical acquisition of $5.1 million, revenue was relatively flat compared to the period ended September 30, 2012.

28

Management estimates a negative impact to sales revenue in September 2013 in excess of $3.0 million due to reduced oilfield activity as a result of record rainfalls and flooding in Colorado.
Energy Chemical Technologies’ gross margin for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 increased $1.1 million , or 5.2% and decreased $0.3 million , or 0.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 . The increase in gross margin for the third quarter was primarily due to the increase in revenue partially offset by the impact of product mix. The decline in gross margin percentage for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to product portfolio mix resulting from proportionately higher sales of nonproprietary products partially offset by the supply chain benefits of the Florida Chemical acquisition.
Income from operations for the Energy Chemical Technologies segment decreased $0.3 million , or 1.7% , for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, and declined $4.7 million , or 9.4% , for the year to date period. The quarterly decrease in income from operations is primarily attributable to an increase in headcount, travel and insurance cost offsetting the increase in income from additional revenue. The year to date decrease in income from operations is primarily related to increased headcount, travel and insurance cost relative to the same period in 2012. The decline in income from operations percentage of revenue in both the quarter and year to date comparisons is primarily due to decreases in gross margin percentages resulting from product portfolio mix and increased headcount and travel related costs incurred in pursuit of growth opportunities.
Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies (dollars in thousands)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Revenue
$
15,292

$
—

$
27,967

$
—

Gross margin
3,588

—

7,281

—

Gross margin %
23.5
%
—
%
26.0
%
—
%
Income from operations
2,301

—

4,648

—

Income from operations %
15.0
%
—
%
16.6
%
—
%

CICT Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
CICT revenue for the third quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 was $15.3 million and $28.0 million respectively. Revenue for the third quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 is incremental to the Company for both the periods as the segment is a new segment acquired during the second quarter of 2013. CICT revenue is primarily driven by demand for d-Limonene and other bio-based chemistries produced for a multitude of industries, as well as from citrus isolates produced for the flavor and fragrance industry. Revenue for CICT is subject to market seasonality and availability of raw materials.
CICT gross margin for the third quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 contributed incrementally to the Company's overall consolidated margin as part of the new segment of business acquired during the second quarter of 2013. The primary drivers of the segments margins of the CICT segment are demand for the Company's bio-based chemistries and the high value flavor and fragrance isolates. The general direction of the citrus oil markets and seasonality of flavor compounds can also impact margin results.
Income from operations for the third quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 contributed incrementally to the Company's overall consolidated income from operations over the comparable periods of 2012.
Drilling Technologies (dollars in thousands)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Revenue
$
27,569

$
30,424

$
86,268

$
89,214

Gross margin
10,821

11,252

34,622

34,764

Gross margin %
39.3
%
37.0
%
40.1
%
39.0
%
Income from operations
4,309

5,329

15,510

17,320

Income from operations %
15.6
%
17.5
%
18.0
%
19.4
%

29

Drilling Technologies Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

Drilling Technologies revenue for the quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 decreased $2.9 million or 9.4% and $2.9 million or 3.3% respectively, relative to the same periods in 2012. Revenue declines can be primarily attributed to a decline in actuated tool rentals.

•
Product revenue for the third quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter of 2012 decreased by $2.0 million, or 18.4%. The year to date revenue increased by $0.6 million or 2.3% relative to the same period in 2012 due to improved sales of centralizers, float equipment, and motor equipment in the Northeast, Bakken, and Eagle Ford regions that were a result of higher sales to existing customers and better pricing on customer contracts.

•
Rental revenue for the third quarter decreased $1.1 million, or 6.5% in relation to the third quarter of 2012 due to actuated tool rental revenue (motors, jars and shocks) declining by $3.0 million or 43% in 2013 due to increased competition, competitive pricing pressure, and strategic selection of higher margin rental jobs for these tools. Partially offsetting the actuated tool decrease was an increase in Teledrift MWD, initial rentals for the Stemulator product line and other drilling tool rentals of $1.9 million or 19%. Rental revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 decreased by $4.7 million or 9.1% in comparison to the year to date 2012 period. This year to date decline is also due to a $7.6 million or 37% decrease in actuated tool rentals for the same reasons as stated above for the quarter. The Teledrift MWD, Stemulator and other rentals increased by $2.9 million or 10% to partially offset the actuated tool decrease year to date.

•
Service revenue for the third quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 increased $.2 million, or 4.8% and $1.1 million, or 11.5%, respectively, relative to comparable periods in 2012. The increased service revenue was primarily related to increased rig installations, inspections, and increased pricing of service offered in the market.


Drilling Technologies gross margin for the quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 decreased slightly by $0.4 million , or 3.8% , and $0.1 million , or 0.4% , respectively over comparable periods of 2012 but increased as a percentage of revenue by 2.3% for the quarter and 1.2% year to date. The rental mix change from lower margin actuated tool rentals to higher margin Teledrift and other drilling tools helped to increase the overall gross margin percentages.
Drilling Technologies income from operations for the quarter and year to date periods ended September 30, 2013 decreased by $1.0 million , or 19.1% , and $1.8 million , or 10.5% , respectively over the same periods in 2012 primarily due to increased salary, medical, and general insurance expenses.
Artificial Lift Technologies (dollars in thousands)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Revenue
$
3,857

$
4,015

$
11,953

$
9,085

Gross margin
1,244

1,817

4,275

3,699

Gross margin %
32.3
%
45.3
%
35.8
%
40.7
%
Income from operations
769

1,384

2,712

2,284

Income from operations %
19.9
%
34.5
%
22.7
%
25.1
%
Artificial Lift Technologies Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Revenue for the Artificial Lift Technologies segment for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 decreased slightly by $0.2 million , or 3.9% from the same quarter in 2012. Declining international valve sales from a 2012 contract were offset by increased pump equipment sales domestically. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 revenue increased by $2.9 million , or 31.6% , relative to the same period in 2012 as sales of pumps and pump equipment have increased due to rebounds in the gas workover drilling market, additional installs in 2013, and diversification into more oil related equipment sales in the Bakken region.
Artificial Lift Technologies gross margin decreased by $0.6 million or 31.5% quarter to date September 30, 2013 as compared to quarter to date September 30, 2012 due to the decreased international valve sales that carry higher margins which in large

30

part were replaced by lower margin domestic pump equipment sales. The gross margins increased by $0.6 million or 15.6% year to date 2013, relative to the same period in 2012 due to the increased sales of pump equipment this year. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin has declined by 4.9% year to date from 2012 as the increase in revenue in 2013 is almost entirely made up of pump equipment which carries much lower margins than the international valve sales, which were flat year over year.
Income from operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 decreased by $0.6 million or 44.4% compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, but increased $0.4 million or 18.7% , for the year to date period ended September 30, 2013 .
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as “structured finance” or “special purpose entities” (“SPEs”), established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of September 30, 2013 , the Company was not involved in any unconsolidated SPEs.
The Company has not made any guarantees to customers or vendors nor does the Company have any off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, change in financial condition, revenue, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that would be material to investors.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company’s Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Preparation of these statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 2 of "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements" and Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations, “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, and the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report describe the significant accounting policies and critical accounting estimates used to prepare the consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting policies and estimates are defined as those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most subjective judgments. The Company regularly reviews and challenges judgments, assumptions and estimates related to critical accounting policies. The Company’s estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and expected changes in the business environment; however, actual results may materially differ from the estimates.
As part of the acquisition process the Company reaffirmed policies and estimates surrounding business combination in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), specifically, utilizing the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 805, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141R, as amended by FSP SAFAS No. 141(R)-1 which became effective on January 1, 2009. ASC Topic 805 requires an acquiring entity in a transaction to recognize all of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value at the acquisition date at their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, to recognize and measure pre-acquisition contingencies, including contingent consideration, at fair value (if possible), to remeasure liabilities related to contingent consideration at fair value in each subsequent reporting period and to expense all acquisition relates costs. Though the Company has implemented business combination accounting guidance, there have been no significant changes in the Company’s critical accounting estimates during the three months ended September 30, 2013 .
Application of New Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted the accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2012-02, “ Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment ,” which permits a company to perform qualitative assessments regarding the likelihood that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired and subsequently assess the need to perform a quantitative impairment test. Implementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted the accounting guidance in ASU No. 2013-02, " Comprehensive Income: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ," which provides accounting guidance on the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance requires an entity to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income if the amount is reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period,

31

a cross reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail about the reclassification amounts is required. Implementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Overview
Ongoing capital requirements arise from the Company’s need to service debt, acquire and maintain equipment, and fund working capital requirements. During the first half of 2013 , the Company funded capital requirements primarily with operating cash flows and draws upon the Company's Revolving Credit Facility. Additionally, during the first half of 2013, the Company financed the acquisition of Florida Chemical through a combination of cash, additional term borrowings, advances on its revolving credit facility, and issuance of common stock.
The Company's primary source of debt financing is its Revolving Credit Facility with PNC Bank. This credit facility contains provisions for revolving debt of up to $75.0 million , based on a borrowing base supported by accounts receivable and inventory, and a term loan of $50.0 million . As of September 30, 2013 , the Company had $27.4 million in outstanding borrowings under the revolving debt portion of the credit facility and $47.6 million outstanding under the term loan. At September 30, 2013 , the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants. Significant terms of the Company’s credit facility are discussed in Part I, Item 1 — "Financial Statements" in Note 10 of "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements" in this Quarterly Report.
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $4.4 million at September 30, 2013 . During the first three quarters of 2013, the Company generated $21.4 million of cash inflows from operations, net of $19.0 million expended in working capital. The Company used a net $58.8 million of cash in investing activities. The Company used $10.0 million for capital expenditures and a net $53.4 million for the purchase of Florida Chemical. Partially offsetting the cash outflows in investing activities were proceeds of $4.6 million from the sale of assets. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $39.3 million . The Company repaid draws and term loans on the amended Credit Facility of $204.3 million , and $3.6 million , respectively. Additionally, the Company paid $5.2 million of principal on convertible debt (completely repaying all convertible debt), $5.3 million in purchases of treasury stock for tax withholding purposes related to vesting of restricted stock awards and $1.0 million in capital lease payments. In May 2013, the Company amended its Credit Facility with PNC Bank. As of September 30, 2013 gross proceeds from draws on the amended Credit Facility and term loans were $231.7 million and $26.2 million , respectively.
Plan of Operations for 2013
The Company’s 2013 Plan of Operations anticipates stable industry economic conditions and includes the following initiatives:
•
Continue capital expenditure budget for 2013, with remaining total $8.0 million, excluding amounts received from lost-in-hole revenue.
•
Expand into identified foreign markets to realize strategic benefits for existing business segments.
•
Continue to actively explore opportunities with existing and potential business partners to broaden geographic market penetration and use of new products and services.
•
Emphasize development of product lines that could contribute to gross margin improvement.
•
Manage operating cash flows through receivables, payables and inventory management.
•
Manage asset utilization to enhance and increase operating and market synergies across all business and product lines.
•
Pursue selected strategic acquisitions, partnerships, and contracts as opportunities arise.


32

Cash Flows
Consolidated cash flows by type of activity are noted below (in thousands):
Nine months ended September 30,
2013
2012
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
21,360

$
38,457

Net cash used in investing activities
(58,786
)
(11,898
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
39,274

(51,316
)
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
(179
)
(16
)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
$
1,669

$
(24,773
)
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $21.4 million and $38.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. Consolidated net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $25.2 million , compared to consolidated net income of $26.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 .
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 , net non-cash contributions to net income totaled $15.2 million . Contributory non-cash items consisted of depreciation and amortization ( $10.9 million ) and stock-based compensation expense ( $8.7 million ). Non-cash reductions to net income included net gains on asset disposals ( $3.5 million ) and net increases in deferred income taxes ( $0.3 million ).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 , noncash reductions to net income totaled $20.7 million , primarily consisting of stock compensation expense ( $9.6 million ), asset depreciation and amortization ( $8.5 million ), a loss on extinguishment of debt ( $4.3 million ), accretion of debt discount ( $2.9 million ), deferred income taxes ($1.0 million), and deferred financing cost amortization ( $0.7 million ) partially offset by non-cash contributions to net income of a decrease in the fair value of the Company's warrant liability ($2.7 million), a net gain on sale of assets ( $3.0 million ) and recognized incremental tax benefits related to the Company’s shared based awards ( $0.6 million ).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 , net working capital was reduced by $19.0 million . Working capital was used to decrease accounts payable and accrued liabilities ( $12.4 million ), increase inventory ( $2.1 million ), and increase accounts receivable ( $6.5 million ). Offsetting the reductions to working capital was increased income taxes payable ( $1.6 million ), decreased other current assets ( $0.3 million ), increased accrued liabilities ( $4.9 million ), and decreased restricted cash ( $0.2 million ).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 , changes in working capital used was $8.8 million of cash primarily to meet increased market demand for Flotek's products and services. Use of working capital was primarily evidenced by increased inventory ( $4.3 million ), decreased income taxes payable ( $3.0 million ), increased other current assets ( $2.2 million ), and decreased interest payable ( $1.7 million ) partially offset by decreased accounts receivable ( $0.5 million ) and increased accounts payable and accrued liabilities ( $1.9 million ).
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $58.8 million and $11.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. The change in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was largely due to payments made for the Florida Chemical acquisition in May 2013 ( $53.4 million ). Also, capital expenditures were $10.0 million and $15.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 , respectively. Cash flows used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were partially offset by $4.6 million and $3.4 million , respectively, of proceeds received from the sale of fixed assets.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $39.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 . Cash provided by financing activities consisted primarily of borrowings from the Company's revolving credit facility ( $231.7 million ) and issuances under the Company's term loan ( $26.2 million ), proceeds from the sale of common stock ( $0.6 million ) and exercise of stock options ( $0.5 million ). Cash provided by financing activities were partially offset by repayment of borrowings against the Company's Revolving Credit Facility ( $204.3 million ), purchases of treasury stock for tax withholding purposes related to vesting of restricted stock awards ( $5.3 million ), repayments of the Company's convertible notes ( $5.2 million ), monthly term loan payments ( $3.6 million ), payments on capital lease obligations ( $1.0 million ), and debt issuance costs ( $1.2 million ).

33

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 , financing activities used net cash of $51.3 million . Net cash used in financing activities during the first nine months of 2012 consisted primarily of repayments of the Company's senior unsecured convertible debt ($36.0 million), and repayments of its senior secured convertible debt ($15.0 million). Additional payments made during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 consisted of cash outlay incurred in the reacquisition of common stock pursuant to payment made for employee taxes associated with stock based compensation transactions ( $0.5 million ). These payments were partially offset by a decrease in the excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation ( $0.6 million ), proceeds from warrant exercises ( $0.3 million ), and proceeds from the exercise of stock options ( $0.2 million ).
Although the Company has no immediate intention to access the capital markets, the Company intends to file a "universal" shelf registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the coming weeks. This shelf registration statement will register the issuance and sale from time to time of various securities by the Company, including but not limited to senior notes, subordinated notes, preferred stock, common stock, and warrants. Once this shelf registration statement is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and becomes effective, the Company will have the financial flexibility to access the capital markets quickly and efficiently from time to time as the need may arise.
Contractual Obligations
Cash flows from operations are dependent on a variety of factors, including fluctuations in operating results, accounts receivable collections, inventory management, and the timing of payments for goods and services. Correspondingly, the impact of contractual obligations on the Company’s liquidity and capital resources in future periods is analyzed in conjunction with such factors.
Material contractual obligations consist of repayment of amounts borrowed on the Company's Credit Facility with PNC Bank and payment of capital and operating lease obligations. Contractual obligations at September 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
Payments Due by Period
Total
Less than 1 year
1 - 3 years
3 - 5 years
More than 5 years
Term loan
$
47,619

$
7,143

$
14,286

$
26,190

$
—

Interest expense on term loan (1)
6,671

2,023

3,072

1,576

—

Borrowings under revolving credit facility (2)
27,377

27,377

—

—

—

Capital lease obligations
1,643

1,009

634

—

—

Operating lease obligations
9,372

1,641

2,518

1,662

3,551

Total
$
92,682

$
39,193

$
20,510

$
29,428

$
3,551

(1) Interest expense amounts assume interest rates on this variable rate obligation remain unchanged from September 30, 2013 rates.
(2) The borrowing is classified as current debt. The weighted-average interest rate is 2.25% at September 30, 2013.
Item  3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and, to a limited extent, commodity prices and foreign currency exchange rates. There have been no material changes to the quantitative or qualitative disclosures about market risk set forth in Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Item  4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance that control objectives are attained. The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide such reasonable assurance.

34

The Company's management, with the participation of the principal executive and principal financial officers, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2013, as required by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2013.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company's system of internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
On May 10, 2013, the Company acquired Florida Chemical Company, Inc. ("Florida Chemical"). The Company has excluded Florida Chemical from its evaluation of internal control over financial reporting as permitted by guidance issued by the staff of the SEC for a recently acquired business.


35
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item  1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to routine litigation and other claims that arise in the normal course of business. Management is not aware of any pending or threatened lawsuits or proceedings that are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Item  1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Item  2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Repurchases of the Company's equity securities during the three months ended September 30, 2013 are as follows:
Period
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
Average
Price Paid
per Share
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
Maximum
Dollar Value of
Shares that
May Yet be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs (2)
July 1, 2013 to July 31, 2013
1,886

$
19.29

—

$
25,000,000

August 1, 2013 to August 31, 2013
2,015

$
19.79

—

$
25,000,000

September 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013
45,127

$
21.24

—

$
25,000,000

Total
49,028

$
21.11

—



(1) The Company purchased shares of its common stock (a) to satisfy tax withholding requirements and payment remittance obligations related to period vesting of restricted shares and exercise of non-qualified stock options, and (b) to satisfy payments required for common stock upon the exercise of stock options.
(2) In November 2012, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $25 million of the Company's common stock. Repurchases may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Through September 30, 2013 , the Company has not repurchased any of its common stock and $25 million may yet be used to purchase shares.
Item  3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item  4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item  5. Other Information
None.

36

Item  6. Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007).
3.2

Certificate of Designations for Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).
3.3

Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).
3.4

Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Appendix F to the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on September 27, 2001).
4.1

Form of Certificate of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Appendix E to the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on September 27, 2001).
4.2

Form of Certificate of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Certificate of Designations for Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).
4.3

Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of the Company, dated August 31, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on October 28, 2005).
4.4

Form of Exercisable Warrant, dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).
4.5

Form of Contingent Warrant, dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).
4.6

Form of Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated as of June 14, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2012).
31.1

*
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
31.2

*
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
32.1

*
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
32.2

*
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
101.INS

**
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH

**
XBRL Schema Document.
101.CAL

**
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB

**
XBRL Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE

**
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF

**
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
*

Filed herewith.
**

Furnished with this Form 10-Q, not filed.


37

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
By:
/s/    JOHN W. CHISHOLM
John W. Chisholm
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
Date: November 6, 2013
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
By:
/s/    H. RICHARD WALTON
H. Richard Walton
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 6, 2013


38
TABLE OF CONTENTS