GBDC 10-Q Quarterly Report Dec. 31, 2012 | Alphaminr
GOLUB CAPITAL BDC, Inc.

GBDC 10-Q Quarter ended Dec. 31, 2012

GOLUB CAPITAL BDC, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 v333238_10q.htm QUARTERLY REPORT

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-Q



þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2012

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to

Commission File Number 814-00794



Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware 27-2326940
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

150 South Wacker Drive, Suite 800
Chicago, IL 60606

(Address of principal executive offices)

(312) 205-5050

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of February 7, 2013, the Registrant had 33,105,336 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

Page
Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.

Financial Statements

2
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2012 (unaudited) and September 30, 2012 2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended December 31, 2012 (unaudited) and 2011 (unaudited) 3
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the three months ended December 31, 2012 (unaudited) and 2011 (unaudited) 4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended December 31, 2012 (unaudited) and 2011 (unaudited) 5
Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of December 31, 2012 (unaudited) and September 30, 2012 6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) 27

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

50

Item 3.

Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

68

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

68
Part II. Other Information

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

69

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

69

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

69

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

69

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

69

Item 5.

Other Information

69

Item 6.

Exhibits

70

i


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. Financial Information

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012
(unaudited)
Assets
Investments, at fair value (cost of $765,626 and $669,841, respectively) $ 768,342 $ 672,910
Cash and cash equivalents 21,420 13,891
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 39,226 37,036
Interest receivable 3,245 3,906
Deferred financing costs 6,373 5,898
Other assets 397 455
Total Assets $ 839,003 $ 734,096
Liabilities
Debt $ 400,450 $ 352,300
Interest payable 2,473 1,391
Management and incentive fees payable 4,782 4,203
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 1,452 1,073
Payable for investments purchased 10,456
Total Liabilities 419,613 358,967
Net Assets
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 1,000,000 shares authorized, zero shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 28,605,336 and 25,688,101 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively 29 26
Paid in capital in excess of par 419,648 375,563
Capital distributions in excess of net investment income 779 347
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and derivative instruments 5,384 5,737
Net realized loss on investments and derivative instruments (6,450 ) (6,544 )
Total Net Assets 419,390 375,129
Total Liabilities and Total Net Assets $ 839,003 $ 734,096
Number of common shares outstanding 28,605,336 25,688,101
Net asset value per common share $ 14.66 $ 14.60



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Three months ended December 31,
2012 2011
Investment income
Interest income $ 18,327 $ 12,100
Dividend income 267 377
Total investment income 18,594 12,477
Expenses
Interest and other debt financing expenses 2,995 2,366
Base management fee 2,468 1,874
Incentive fee 2,394 909
Professional fees 493 588
Administrative service fee 548 262
General and administrative expenses 118 136
Total expenses 9,016 6,135
Net investment income 9,578 6,342
Net loss on investments
Net realized gain (loss) on investments 94 (2,115 )
Net realized gain on derivative instruments 264
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments (353 ) 343
Net change in unrealized appreciation on derivative instruments 1,357
Net loss on investments (259 ) (151 )
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations $ 9,319 $ 6,191
Per Common Share Data
Basic and diluted earnings per common share $ 0.33 $ 0.28
Dividends and distributions declared per common share $ 0.32 $ 0.32
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 27,933,613 21,734,720



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets (unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)

Common Stock Paid in Capital in Excess
of Par
Capital Distributions in Excess of Net Investment Income Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments and Derivative Instruments Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Derivative Instruments Total
Net Assets
Shares Par Amount
Balance at September 30, 2011 21,733,903 $ 22 $ 318,302 $ (398 ) $ (1,519 ) $ 142 $ 316,549
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
resulting from operations
6,342 1,700 (1,851 ) 6,191
Distributions to stockholders:
Stock issued in connection with dividend reinvestment plan 25,052 375 375
Dividends and distributions (6,955 ) (6,955 )
Balance at December 31, 2011 21,758,955 $ 22 $ 318,677 $ (1,011 ) $ 181 $ (1,709 ) $ 316,160
Balance at September 30, 2012 25,688,101 $ 26 $ 375,563 $ 347 $ 5,737 $ (6,544 ) $ 375,129
Issuance of common stock, net of offering and underwriting costs (1) 2,894,120 3 43,742 43,745
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
resulting from operations
9,578 (353 ) 94 9,319
Distributions to stockholders:
Stock issued in connection with dividend reinvestment plan 23,115 343 343
Dividends and distributions (9,146 ) (9,146 )
Balance at December 31, 2012 28,605,336 $ 29 $ 419,648 $ 779 $ 5,384 $ (6,450 ) $ 419,390

(1) On October 16, 2012, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. priced a public offering of 2,600,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $15.58 per share. On November 14, 2012, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. sold an additional 294,120 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $15.58 per share pursuant to the underwriters’ partial exercise of the over-allotment option.



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
(In thousands)

Three Months Ended December 31,
2012 2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations $ 9,319 $ 6,191
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from
operations to net cash used in operating activities
Amortization of deferred financing costs 366 340
Accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums (2,440 ) (1,090 )
Net realized (gain) loss on investments (94 ) 2,115
Net realized gain on derivative instruments (264 )
Net change in unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on investments 353 (343 )
Net change in unrealized depreciation on derivative instruments (1,357 )
Fundings of revolving loans, net (2,828 ) (1,046 )
Fundings of investments (235,325 ) (144,546 )
Proceeds from principal payments and sales of portfolio investments 145,609 42,876
Proceeds from derivative instruments 264
Payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest (705 ) (185 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Interest receivable 661 (127 )
Cash collateral on deposit with custodian 122
Other assets 58 21
Interest payable 1,082 723
Management and incentive fees payable 579 1,114
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 379 79
Payable for investments purchased 10,456
Receivable for investments sold (1,449 )
Net cash used in operating activities (72,530 ) (96,562 )
Cash flows from investing activities
Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents (2,190 ) 8,961
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (2,190 ) 8,961
Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings on debt 107,650 74,217
Repayments of debt (59,500 )
Capitalized debt financing costs (841 ) (939 )
Proceeds from shares sold, net of underwriting costs 43,825
Offering costs paid (80 )
Dividends and distributions paid (8,805 ) (6,580 )
Net cash provided by financing activities 82,249 66,698
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 7,529 (20,903 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 13,891 46,350
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 21,420 $ 25,447
Supplemental information:
Cash paid during the period for interest $ 1,547 $ 1,304
Dividends and distributions declared during the period $ 9,146 $ 6,955



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
December 31, 2012
(In thousands)

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount
Cost Percentage
of
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Investments
Canada
Debt investments
Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures, Entertainment
Extreme Fitness, Inc. (3) (4) Subordinated debt N/A 14.50 % 11/2015 $ 2,889 $ 2,810 0.1 % $ 289
Extreme Fitness, Inc. Senior loan N/A 8.00 % 12/2012 596 596 0.1 596
Total Canada $ 3,485 $ 3,406 0.2 % $ 885
Fair Value as percentage of Principal Amount
25.4 %
United States
Debt investments
Aerospace and Defense
Aderant North
America, Inc.*
Senior loan P + 4.00 % 7.25 % 12/2018 $ 4,529 $ 4,484 1.1 % $ 4,484
ILC Dover, LP Senior loan P + 4.75 % 8.00 % 07/2017 85 78 80
ILC Dover, LP Senior loan L + 5.75 % 7.01 % 07/2017 4,393 4,315 1.0 4,349
ILC Dover, LP Senior loan L + 5.75 % 7.02 % 07/2017 612 606 0.1 606
Tresys Technology Holdings, Inc. Senior loan L + 6.75 % 8.75 % 12/2017 4,025 3,925 0.9 3,965
Tresys Technology Holdings, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 6.75 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (10 ) (10 )
Whitcraft LLC Subordinated debt N/A 12.00 % 12/2018 1,877 1,850 0.4 1,877
White Oak
Technologies, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 03/2017 1,905 1,869 0.4 1,886
White Oak
Technologies, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 03/2017 (7 ) (4 )
17,426 17,110 3.9 17,233
Automobile
ABRA, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 13.50 % 04/2017 966 947 0.2 966
ABRA, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 13.50 % 04/2017 9,623 9,456 2.3 9,623
American Driveline Systems, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.00 % 01/2016 2,847 2,803 0.7 2,762
American Driveline Systems, Inc. Senior loan P + 4.50 % 7.75 % 01/2016 325 319 0.1 313
CLP Auto Interior Corporation* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 4.96 % 06/2013 3,036 3,036 0.7 2,975
Express Oil
Change, LLC*
Senior loan P + 3.50 % 6.75 % 12/2017 1,889 1,870 0.4 1,870
Express Oil
Change, LLC (5)
Senior loan P + 3.50 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (5 ) (5 )
Express Oil Change, LLC Senior loan P + 3.50 % 6.75 % 12/2017 151 148 148
Federal-Mogul Corporation Senior loan L + 1.94 % 2.15 % 12/2014 1,971 1,933 0.4 1,821
Federal-Mogul Corporation Senior loan L + 1.94 % 2.15 % 12/2015 1,006 985 0.2 929
K&N Engineering, Inc. (5) Senior loan P + 4.25 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (6 )
K&N Engineering, Inc. Senior loan P + 4.25 % 7.50 % 12/2016 3,183 3,132 0.8 3,183
24,997 24,618 5.8 24,585



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount
Cost Percentage
of
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Banking
Prommis Fin Co.* (3) (4) Senior loan L + 9.50 % 10.50 % 06/2015 201 191 161
Prommis Fin Co.* (3) (4) Second lien L + 9.50 % 10.50 % 06/2015 403 382 133
Prommis Fin Co.* (3) (4) Second lien L + 9.50 % 10.50 % 06/2015 202 191
Prommis Fin Co. Senior loan L + 9.00 % 10.00 % 06/2015 120 119 120
926 883 414
Beverage, Food and Tobacco
ABP Corporation (5) Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 06/2016 (5 )
ABP Corporation* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 06/2016 4,524 4,463 1.1 4,524
Ameriqual Group, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 03/2016 1,774 1,751 0.4 1,685
Ameriqual Group, LLC* Senior loan L + 7.50 % 9.00 % 03/2016 837 826 0.2 754
Atkins Nutritionals, Inc* Second lien L + 8.69 % 10.19 % 12/2015 6,121 6,000 1.5 6,121
Candy Intermediate Holdings, Inc. Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.51 % 06/2018 4,975 4,816 1.2 5,039
First Watch
Restaurants, Inc.
Senior loan L + 7.50 % 8.75 % 12/2016 421 394 0.1 421
First Watch
Restaurants, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 7.50 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (28 )
First Watch
Restaurants, Inc.*
Senior loan P + 6.50 % 9.75 % 12/2016 11,472 11,290 2.7 11,472
IL Fornaio (America) Corporation* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 06/2017 4,423 4,406 1.1 4,423
IT'SUGAR LLC Senior loan L + 8.50 % 10.00 % 04/2017 4,245 4,171 1.0 4,245
IT'SUGAR LLC Subordinated debt
N/A 8.00 % 10/2017 1,707 1,707 0.5 2,270
Julio & Sons Company (5) Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 09/2014 (13 )
Julio & Sons Company* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.00 % 09/2016 7,103 7,050 1.7 7,103
Julio & Sons Company (5) Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 09/2016 (11 )
Richelieu Foods, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.76 % 11/2015 2,082 2,049 0.5 2,082
Richelieu Foods, Inc. Senior loan P + 4.00 % 7.25 % 11/2015 137 128 137
49,821 48,994 12.0 50,276
Building and Real Estate
ASP PDM Acquisition Co. LLC* Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.75 % 12/2013 451 442 0.1 338
Global Claims
Services, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 06/2018 829 817 0.2 829
Global Claims
Services, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 06/2018 (1 )
KHKI Acquisition, Inc. Senior loan L + 5.00 % 8.50 % 03/2017 2,626 2,626 0.4 1,576
Tecta America Corp. Senior loan P + 7.75 % 11.00 % 03/2014 3,779 3,779 0.8 3,267
7,685 7,663 1.5 6,010
Cargo Transport
RedPrairie Corporation* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 6.75 % 12/2018 2,000 1,960 0.5 2,003
RedPrairie Corporation Second lien L + 10.00 % 11.25 % 12/2019 7,500 7,350 1.8 7,587
9,500 9,310 2.3 9,590
Chemicals, Plastics and Rubber
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 14.00 % 04/2015 2,167 2,121 0.5 2,167
Road Infrastructure Investment, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 03/2017 (39 ) (3 )
Road Infrastructure Investment, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 03/2018 4,127 4,072 1.0 4,135
6,294 6,154 1.5 6,299



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (unaudited) — (Continued)
December 31, 2012
(In thousands)

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Containers, Packaging and Glass
Fort Dearborn Company* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 10/2017 50 50 50
Fort Dearborn Company* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 10/2018 192 190 192
Fort Dearborn Company* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 10/2017 481 476 0.1 481
Fort Dearborn Company* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 10/2018 1,843 1,825 0.4 1,843
John Henry
Holdings Inc.
Second lien L + 9.00 % 10.25 % 06/2020 1,175 1,146 0.3 1,152
3,741 3,687 0.8 3,718
Diversified Conglomerate Manufacturing
Chase Industries, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 6.75 % 11/2017 11,785 11,575 2.8 11,667
Pasternack
Enterprises, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 12/2017 1,290 1,277 0.3 1,277
Sunless Merger
Sub, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 07/2016 2,261 2,253 0.5 2,171
Sunless Merger
Sub, Inc.
Senior loan P + 4.00 % 7.25 % 07/2016 65 64 54
Tecomet Inc. Senior loan L + 5.25 % 7.00 % 12/2016 1,681 1,658 0.4 1,681
Tecomet Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 7.00 % 12/2016 4,363 4,302 1.0 4,363
Tecomet Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (6 )
TIDI Products, LLC* Senior loan L + 7.00 % 8.25 % 07/2018 8,769 8,592 2.1 8,769
TIDI Products, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 7.00 % N/A (6) 07/2017 (12 )
Vintage Parts, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.00 % 8.50 % 12/2013 76 76 76
Vintage Parts, Inc.* Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.75 % 12/2013 1,141 1,131 0.3 1,175
Vintage Parts, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 5.81 % 12/2013 5,462 5,448 1.3 5,298
36,893 36,358 8.7 36,531
Diversified Conglomerate Service
Agility Recovery Solutions Inc. Senior loan L + 6.75 % 8.00 % 12/2017 5,498 5,361 1.3 5,416
Agility Recovery Solutions Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 6.75 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (7 ) (7 )
API Healthcare Corporation* Senior loan L + 9.11 % 10.61 % 02/2017 9,464 9,312 2.3 9,464
Consona Holdings, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 6.75 % 08/2018 1,078 1,044 0.3 1,078
Consona Holdings, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.25 % 08/2018 1,563 1,548 0.4 1,563
Consona
Holdings, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 08/2017 (3 )
Document
Technologies, LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (15 )
Document
Technologies, LLC
Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 12/2016 4,992 4,925 1.2 4,992
EAG, Inc.* Senior loan P + 3.50 % 6.75 % 07/2017 2,560 2,527 0.6 2,560
HighJump
Acquisition LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 8.75 % N/A (6) 07/2016 (11 )
HighJump
Acquisition LLC
Senior loan L + 8.75 % 10.00 % 07/2016 5,427 5,369 1.3 5,427
Marathon Data Operating Co., LLC Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.50 % 08/2017 4,807 4,695 1.1 4,807
Marathon Data Operating Co., LLC (5) Senior loan L + 6.25 % N/A (6) 08/2017 (10 )



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

8


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
MSC.Software Corporation* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 7.75 % 11/2017 10,419 10,223 2.4 10,262
Navex Global, Inc. Senior loan L + 7.50 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (20 )
Navex Global, Inc.* Senior loan L + 7.50 % 9.00 % 12/2016 18,103 17,732 4.3 18,103
NetSmart
Technologies, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 7.03 % 8.28 % 12/2017 8,537 8,447 2.0 8,446
NetSmart
Technologies, Inc.
Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.25 % 12/2017 667 653 0.2 652
PC Helps Support, LLC Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.51 % 09/2017 2,324 2,292 0.6 2,324
PC Helps
Support, LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 09/2017 (2 )
Secure-24, LLC Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.50 % 08/2017 9,265 9,050 2.2 9,265
Secure-24, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 6.25 % N/A (6) 08/2017 (8 )
Secure-24, LLC Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.50 % 08/2017 553 538 0.1 553
Source Medical Solutions, Inc. Second lien L + 9.50 % 10.75 % 03/2018 9,294 9,071 2.2 9,155
94,551 92,711 22.5 94,060
Diversified Natural Resources, Precious Metals, and Minerals
Metal Spinners, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 8.00 % 12/2014 1,466 1,433 0.3 1,466
Metal Spinners, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 8.00 % 12/2014 2,935 2,874 0.7 2,935
4,401 4,307 1.0 4,401
Electronics
Cape Electrical
Supply LLC* (4)
Senior loan L + 5.75 % 7.00 % 06/2013 1,332 1,319 0.3 1,332
Ecommerce
Industries, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 6.75 % N/A (6) 10/2016 (25 )
Ecommerce
Industries, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 8.39 % 9.64 % 10/2016 13,352 13,166 3.2 13,352
Entrust, Inc./Entrust Limited* Second lien L + 9.50 % 10.75 % 04/2019 5,204 5,153 1.2 5,204
Entrust, Inc./Entrust Limited* Second lien L + 9.50 % 10.75 % 04/2019 11,523 11,411 2.7 11,523
Rogue Wave
Holdings, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 7.00 % 8.25 % 11/2017 6,307 6,229 1.5 6,228
Sparta Systems, Inc. Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 12/2017 55 46 46
Sparta Systems, Inc. Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 12/2017 6,838 6,753 1.6 6,753
Syncsort Incorporated (5) Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 03/2015 (4 )
Syncsort Incorporated* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.50 % 03/2015 7,138 7,036 1.7 7,138
Time-O-Matic, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 13.25 % 12/2016 11,598 11,434 2.8 11,598
63,347 62,518 15.0 63,174
Farming and Agriculture
AGData, L.P. Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.75 % 08/2016 2,774 2,745 0.7 2,774
Finance
Ascensus, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.75 % 8.00 % 12/2018 18,093 17,731 4.2 17,731
Bonddesk Group LLC* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 09/2016 995 988 0.2 995
Compass Group Diversified
Holdings, LLC*
Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 10/2017 8,366 8,023 2.0 8,413
Pillar
Processing LLC* (3)
Senior loan L + 5.50 % 5.82 % 11/2013 1,802 1,745 0.3 1,441
Pillar
Processing LLC* (3)
Senior loan N/A 14.50 % 05/2014 3,125 2,830 0.1 469
32,381 31,317 6.8 29,049



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

9


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Healthcare, Education and Childcare
Advanced Pain Management Holdings, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 14.00 % 06/2016 7,999 7,877 1.9 7,999
Alegeus
Technologies, LLC*
Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 08/2018 871 859 0.2 871
Avatar
International, LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 7.50 % N/A (6) 09/2016 (7 )
Avatar
International, LLC*
Senior loan L + 7.50 % 8.75 % 09/2016 7,804 7,704 1.9 7,804
Avatar
International, LLC
Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.25 % 09/2016 1,684 1,667 0.4 1,684
Campus Management Acquisition Corp. Second lien L + 6.80 % 8.55 % 09/2015 5,067 5,012 1.1 4,662
DDC Center Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 9.50 % 10/2014 8,134 8,142 1.9 8,134
DDC Center Inc. Senior loan P + 5.25 % 10.75 % 10/2013 182 182 182
Delta Educational Systems* Senior loan P + 4.75 % 8.00 % 12/2016 2,203 2,168 0.5 2,071
Dialysis Newco, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 13.00 % 09/2018 8,839 8,727 2.1 8,839
Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.50 % 06/2017 5,196 5,068 1.2 5,144
Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 6.25 % N/A (6) 06/2017 (15 ) (10 )
G & H Wire
Company, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 11/2016 (12 )
G & H Wire
Company, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.00 % 11/2016 8,915 8,780 2.1 8,915
Hospitalists Management
Group, LLC
Senior loan L + 4.50 % 6.00 % 05/2017 455 445 0.1 410
Hospitalists Management Group, LLC Senior loan L + 4.50 % 6.00 % 05/2017 3,841 3,771 0.9 3,649
Hospitalists Management
Group, LLC
Senior loan L + 4.50 % 6.00 % 05/2017 218 209 173
IntegraMed
America, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 7.25 % N/A (6) 09/2017 (17 )
IntegraMed
America, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 7.25 % 8.50 % 09/2017 14,566 14,255 3.5 14,566
Maverick Healthcare Group, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.25 % 12/2016 2,120 2,096 0.5 2,120
National Healing Corporation Senior loan L + 6.75 % 8.25 % 11/2017 3,560 3,414 0.8 3,560
National Healing Corporation* Second lien L + 10.00 % 11.50 % 11/2018 17,976 17,008 4.3 17,976
NeuroTherm, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 02/2016 1,559 1,538 0.4 1,559
NeuroTherm, Inc. Senior loan P + 4.00 % 7.25 % 02/2016 46 41 46
Northwestern Management Services, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 6.75 % 10/2017 3,077 3,040 0.7 3,039
Northwestern Management Services, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 10/2017 (6 ) (6 )
Northwestern Management Services, LLC Senior loan L + 5.50 % 6.75 % 10/2017 95 89 89
Pentec Acquisition
Sub, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 05/2018 2,214 2,174 0.5 2,104
Pentec Acquisition
Sub, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 05/2017 (4 ) (10)



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

10


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
PhysioTherapy Associates
Holdings, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.01 % 04/2018 575 565 0.1 576
Reliant Pro
ReHab, LLC*
Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 06/2016 3,553 3,510 0.8 3,553
Reliant Pro
ReHab, LLC
Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 06/2016 966 953 0.2 966
Reliant Pro
ReHab, LLC
Senior loan P + 3.75 % 7.00 % 06/2016 638 631 0.2 638
Renaissance Pharma (U.S.) Holdings Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 06/2017 (6 )
Renaissance Pharma (U.S.) Holdings Inc. Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 06/2017 2,388 2,345 0.6 2,388
Southern Anesthesia and Surgical Senior loan P + 5.75 % 9.00 % 11/2017 6,312 6,159 1.5 6,249
Southern Anesthesia and Surgical (5) Senior loan P + 5.75 % N/A (6) 11/2017 (15 ) (11 )
Surgical Information Systems, LLC Second lien L + 7.48 % 8.99 % 12/2015 3,899 3,852 0.9 3,899
WIL Research
Company, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 04/2018 790 780 0.2 788
125,742 122,979 29.5 124,616
Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares, and Durable Consumer
Top Knobs USA, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.75 % 7.00 % 11/2017 2,151 2,124 0.5 2,124
WII Components, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.25 % 07/2016 1,708 1,690 0.4 1,708
WII Components, Inc. Senior loan P + 3.75 % 7.00 % 07/2016 15 14 15
Zenith Products Corporation* Senior loan L + 5.75 % 6.09 % 09/2013 3,369 3,337 0.7 3,032
7,243 7,165 1.6 6,879
Insurance
AssuredPartners
Capital, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 05/2018 1,526 1,511 0.4 1,511
AssuredPartners
Capital, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 5.75 % N/A (6) 11/2018 (19 ) (19 )
Captive Resources
Midco, LLC*
Senior loan L + 5.50 % 6.75 % 10/2018 3,579 3,544 0.8 3,543
Captive Resources
Midco, LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 10/2017 (4 ) (4 )
Evolution1, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.25 % 06/2016 4,596 4,548 1.1 4,596
Evolution1, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 4.75 % N/A (6) 06/2016 (17 )
Evolution1, Inc. Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.25 % 06/2016 89 85 89
9,790 9,648 2.3 9,716
Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment
Competitor Group Holdings, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 7.75 % N/A (6) 11/2018 (51 ) (52 )
Competitor Group Holdings, Inc. Senior loan L + 7.75 % 9.76 % 11/2018 884 869 0.2 869
Competitor Group Holdings, Inc.* Senior loan L + 7.75 % 9.00 % 11/2018 12,870 12,648 3.0 12,645
Octane Fitness, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.00 % 12/2015 4,675 4,562 1.1 4,675
Pride Manufacturing Company, LLC* Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.75 % 11/2015 697 689 0.2 662
Service Companies, The* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 9.00 % 03/2014 6,548 6,502 1.6 6,548
Starplex Operating, L.L.C. Senior loan L + 7.50 % 8.75 % 12/2017 479 450 0.1 454



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

11


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Starplex
Operating, L.L.C.*
Senior loan L + 7.50 % 8.75 % 12/2017 14,379 14,129 3.4 14,163
40,532 39,798 9.6 39,964
Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals
Benetech, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.25 % 10/2017 6,536 6,504 1.6 6,503
Benetech, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 6.00 % N/A (6) 10/2017 (5 ) (6 )
6,536 6,499 1.6 6,497
Personal and Non-Durable Consumer Products
Dr. Miracles, Inc.* (4) Senior loan L + 5.50 % 8.00 % 03/2014 3,002 2,990 0.6 2,702
Hygenic Corporation, The* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 10/2018 3,431 3,381 0.8 3,380
Hygenic Corporation, The (5) Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 10/2017 (4 ) (4 )
Massage Envy, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 7.25 % N/A (6) 09/2018 (18 )
Massage Envy, LLC Senior loan L + 7.25 % 8.50 % 09/2018 16,954 16,552 4.0 16,954
Team Technologies Acquisition Company (5) Senior loan L + 4.75 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (4 ) (4 )
Team Technologies Acquisition Company Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 12/2017 3,537 3,502 0.8 3,502
26,924 26,399 6.2 26,530
Personal, Food and Miscellaneous Services
Affordable Care Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 4.75 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (3 ) (3 )
Affordable Care Inc. Senior loan L + 4.75 % 7.00 % 12/2018 3,559 3,524 0.8 3,523
Automatic Bar Controls, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.75 % 7.26 % 03/2016 972 962 0.2 933
Automatic Bar Controls, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.75 % N/A (6) 03/2016 (1 ) (6 )
Brasa (Holdings) Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.50 % 07/2019 5,113 4,969 1.2 5,113
Focus Brands Inc. Second lien L + 9.00 % 10.25 % 08/2018 11,195 11,058 2.7 11,474
Focus Brands Inc. Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.27 % 02/2018 5,813 5,763 1.4 5,857
National Veterinary Associates, Inc. Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 12/2017 621 606 0.1 606
National Veterinary Associates, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (1 ) (1 )
National Veterinary Associates, Inc. Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 12/2017 6,052 6,000 1.4 5,999
PMI Holdings, Inc. Senior loan P + 4.25 % 7.50 % 06/2017 124 122 124
PMI Holdings, Inc. Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 06/2017 2,649 2,626 0.6 2,649
Restaurant
Technologies, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 05/2017 1,075 1,067 0.3 1,075
Restaurant
Technologies, Inc.
Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 05/2017 117 116 117
Trusthouse
Service Group, Inc.
Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 06/2018 99 95 99
Trusthouse
Service Group, Inc.
Senior loan P + 4.25 % 7.50 % 06/2017 67 63 67
Trusthouse
Service Group, Inc.
Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 06/2018 2,969 2,921 0.7 2,969
Vetcor Merger
Sub LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 6.50 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (25 ) (24 )
Vetcor Merger Sub LLC Senior loan L + 6.50 % 7.75 % 12/2017 304 295 0.1 296
Vetcor Merger
Sub LLC*
Senior loan L + 6.50 % 7.75 % 12/2017 6,005 5,938 1.4 5,940
46,734 46,095 10.9 46,807



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

12


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Personal Transportation
PODS Funding
Corp. II (4)
Subordinated debt N/A 21.00 % 11/2017 3,400 3,400 0.8 3,400
PODS Funding
Corp. II (4)
Subordinated debt N/A 21.00 % 11/2017 579 579 0.1 579
PODS Funding
Corp. II (4)
Second lien N/A 15.50 % 05/2017 450 445 0.1 450
PODS Funding
Corp. II (4)
Second lien N/A 15.50 % 05/2017 2,110 2,062 0.5 2,110
PODS Funding Corp. II Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.26 % 11/2016 773 755 0.2 773
PODS Funding
Corp. II*
Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.25 % 11/2016 6,783 6,627 1.6 6,783
14,095 13,868 3.3 14,095
Printing and Publishing
Digital Technology International, LLC. Senior loan P + 6.00 % 9.25 % 09/2016 928 921 0.2 891
Digital Technology International, LLC. Senior loan L + 7.25 % 8.75 % 09/2016 6,284 6,188 1.4 6,033
Market Track, LLC* Senior loan L + 6.11 % 7.36 % 08/2018 3,138 3,094 0.7 3,138
Market Track, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 6.11 % N/A (6) 08/2018 (6 )
Market Track, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 7.65 % N/A (6) 08/2018 (4 )
Trade Service
Company, LLC*
Senior loan L + 5.75 % 7.00 % 10/2016 1,714 1,695 0.4 1,714
Trade Service
Company, LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 5.75 % N/A (6) 10/2016 (1 )
12,064 11,887 2.7 11,776
Retail Stores
Barcelona
Restaurants, LLC* (7)
Senior loan L + 10.00 % 11.50 % 03/2017 4,952 4,871 1.2 4,952
Barcelona
Restaurants, LLC (5) (7)
Senior loan L + 10.00 % N/A (6) 03/2017 (5 )
Benihana, Inc. Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.25 % 08/2017 182 149 182
Benihana, Inc.* Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.25 % 02/2018 13,456 13,124 3.2 13,456
Capital Vision
Services, LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 7.25 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (18 ) (19 )
Capital Vision
Services, LLC
Senior loan L + 7.25 % 8.50 % 12/2017 380 366 0.1 366
Capital Vision
Services, LLC
Senior loan L + 7.25 % 8.50 % 12/2017 13,459 13,260 3.2 13,257
DTLR, Inc.* Senior loan L + 8.00 % 11.00 % 12/2015 17,304 17,121 4.1 17,304
Marshall Retail
Group, LLC, The (5)
Senior loan L + 6.50 % N/A (6) 10/2016 (14 )
Marshall Retail
Group, LLC, The*
Senior loan L + 6.50 % 8.00 % 10/2016 10,279 10,115 2.5 10,279
Restaurant Holding Company, LLC Senior loan L + 7.50 % 9.00 % 02/2017 9,415 9,259 2.3 9,509
Rubio's
Restaurants, Inc.* (4)
Senior loan L + 7.00 % 8.75 % 06/2015 8,124 8,037 1.9 8,124
Sneaker Villa, Inc. Senior loan L + 8.50 % 10.00 % 12/2017 4,636 4,520 1.1 4,566
Sneaker Villa, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 8.50 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (9 ) (9 )
Sneaker Villa, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 8.50 % N/A (6) 12/2017 (19 ) (19 )
Specialty Commerce Corp. Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.50 % 07/2017 5,344 5,278 1.3 5,344
Specialty Commerce Corp. (5) Senior loan L + 6.00 % N/A (6) 07/2017 (8 )
Vision Source L.P. (5) Senior loan L + 6.75 % N/A (6) 04/2016 (8 )
Vision Source L.P.* Senior loan L + 6.75 % 8.00 % 04/2016 13,116 12,937 3.1 13,116
100,647 98,956 24.0 100,408



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

13


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Telecommunications
Hosting.com, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.50 % 5.75 % 10/2016 827 818 0.2 827
Hosting.com, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 4.50 % N/A (6) 10/2016 (2 )
NameMedia, Inc. Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.50 % 11/2014 28 27 28
NameMedia, Inc. Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.50 % 11/2014 1,331 1,316 0.3 1,331
2,186 2,159 0.5 2,186
Utilities
PowerPlan
Consultants, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 03/2017 (2 )
PowerPlan
Consultants, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.76 % 03/2018 5,030 4,965 1.2 5,030
5,030 4,963 1.2 5,030
Total debt investments United States $ 752,260 $ 738,791 177.1 % $ 742,618
Fair Value as a percentage of Principal Amount 98.7 %



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

14


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (unaudited) — (Continued)
December 31, 2012
(In thousands)

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount/
Shares/
Contracts
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Equity investments Aerospace and Defense
Tresys Technology Holdings, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 295 $ 295 0.1 % $ 295
Whitcraft LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 670 0.2 753
Whitcraft LLC Warrant N/A N/A N/A 147
965 0.3 1,195
Automobile
ABRA, Inc LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 208 1,471 0.4 1,836
Express Oil Change, LLC LLC Interest N/A N/A N/A 77 77 77
K&N Engineering, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 4 22
K&N Engineering, Inc. Preferred stock A N/A N/A N/A 62 73
K&N Engineering, Inc. Preferred stock B N/A N/A N/A 18 23
1,632 0.4 2,031
Banking
Prommis Solutions Inc.* Preferred LLC
interest
N/A N/A N/A 1 472
Prommis Solutions Inc.* A-1 LLC interset N/A N/A N/A
Prommis Solutions Inc.* A-2 LLC interest N/A N/A N/A
472
Beverage, Food and Tobacco
Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 51 746 0.2 746
First Watch Restaurants, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 7 691 0.2 746
Goode Seed Co-Invest, LLC LLC units N/A N/A N/A 356 356 0.1 356
Julio & Sons Company LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 521 521 0.1 619
Richelieu Foods, Inc. LP interest N/A N/A N/A 220 220 193
2,534 0.6 2,660
Diversified Conglomerate Manufacturing
Oasis Outsourcing Holdings, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 1,088 1,088 0.3 1,385
Sunless Merger Sub, Inc Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 148 95
TIDI Products, LLC LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 315 315 0.1 315
1,551 0.4 1,795
Diversified Conglomerate Service
Document
Technologies, LLC
LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 24 490 0.1 536
Marathon Data
Operating Co., LLC
Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 264 0.1 264
Marathon Data
Operating Co., LLC
Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 1 264 0.1 264
Navex Global, Inc. LP interest N/A N/A N/A 666 0.2 757
PC Helps Support, LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 7 7
PC Helps Support, LLC Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 61 61
Secure-24, LLC LLC units N/A N/A N/A 253 253 0.1 253
2,005 0.6 2,142



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

15


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount/
Shares/
Contracts
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Finance
Pillar Processing LLC* Common stock N/A N/A N/A
Healthcare, Education and Childcare
Advanced Pain Management
Holdings, Inc.
Common stock N/A N/A N/A 67 67
Advanced Pain Management
Holdings, Inc.
Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 13 1,273 0.3 1,445
Avatar International, LLC LP interest N/A N/A N/A 1 695 0.2 695
Dialysis Newco, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 871 871 0.2 932
Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 270 270 0.1 270
G & H Wire
Company, Inc.
LP interest N/A N/A N/A 102 102
Hospitalists Management Group, LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 38 32
IntegraMed America, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 514 0.1 607
National Healing Corporation Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 695 799 0.3 1,127
NeuroTherm, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 569 0.1 569
Northwestern Management
Services, LLC
LLC units N/A N/A N/A 3 3 3
Northwestern Management
Services, LLC
LLC units N/A N/A N/A 249 0.1 249
Pentec Healthcare
Infusions, Inc.
Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 1 116 83
Reliant Pro ReHab, LLC Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 2 264 0.1 263
Southern Anesthesia and Surgical LLC units N/A N/A N/A 487 487 0.1 487
Surgical Information Systems, LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 4 414 0.1 346
6,731 1.7 7,210
Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares, and Durable Consumer
Top Knobs USA, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 3 73 73
Insurance
Captive Resources
Midco, LLC
LLC units N/A N/A N/A 1 121 121
Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment
Competitor Group Holdings, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 708 708 0.2 708
Personal and Non-Durable Consumer Products
Hygenic Corporation, The LP interest N/A N/A N/A 1 61 61
Massage Envy, LLC LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 749 749 0.2 749
Team Technologies Acquisition Company Common stock N/A N/A N/A 148 148
958 0.2 958
Personal Transportation
PODS Funding Corp. II Warrant N/A N/A N/A 271 151



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

16


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest
Rate (2)
Maturity
Date
Principal
Amount/
Shares/
Contracts
Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair
Value
Printing and Publishing
Market Track, LLC Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 145 145
Market Track, LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 145 145
290 290
Retail Stores
Barcelona
Restaurants, LLC (7)
LP interest N/A N/A N/A 1,996 1,996 0.6 2,538
Benihana, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 43 699 0.2 699
Capital Vision
Services, LLC
LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 402 402 0.1 402
Rubio's Restaurants, Inc. Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 199 945 0.1 599
Sneaker Villa, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 4 411 0.1 411
Vision Source L.P. Common stock N/A N/A N/A
Vision Source L.P. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 9 936 0.2 856
5,389 1.3 5,505
Total equity investments United States $ 23,429 5.9 % $ 24,839
Total United States $ 762,220 183.0 % $ 767,457
Total investments $ 765,626 183.2 % $ 768,342

* Denotes that all or a portion of the loan secures the notes offered in the Debt Securitization (as defined in Note 6).
(1) The majority of the investments bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR” or “L”) or Prime (“P”) and which reset daily, quarterly or semiannually. For each we have provided the spread over LIBOR or Prime and the weighted average current interest rate in effect at December 31, 2012. Certain investments are subject to a LIBOR or Prime interest rate floor. For fixed rate loans, a spread above a reference rate is not applicable.
(2) For portfolio companies with multiple interest rate contracts, the interest rate shown is a weighted average current interest rate in effect at December 31, 2012.
(3) Loan was on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2012, meaning that the Company has ceased recognizing interest income on the loan.
(4) A portion of the interest may be deferred through a PIK rate option.
(5) The negative fair value is the result of the capitalized discount on the loan or the unfunded commitment being valued below par. The negative cost is the result of the capitalized discount being greater than the principal amount outstanding on the loan.
(6) The entire commitment was unfunded at December 31, 2012. As such, no interest is being earned on this investment.
(7) The Company is an “affiliated person,” as that term is defined in the 1940 Act, of the portfolio company as it owns five percent or more of the portfolio company's voting securities.



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

17


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2012
(In thousands)

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Principal Amount Cost Percentage
of
Net Assets
Fair Value
Investments
Canada
Debt investments
Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures, Entertainment
Extreme Fitness, Inc. (3) (4) Subordinated debt N/A 14.50 % 11/2015 $ 2,870 $ 2,810 0.4 % $ 1,435
Extreme Fitness, Inc. Senior loan N/A 8.00 % 10/2012 508 508 0.1 508
Total Canada $ 3,378 $ 3,318 0.5 % $ 1,943
Fair Value as percentage of Principal Amount 57.5 %
United States
Debt investments
Aerospace and Defense
ILC Dover, LP (5) Senior loan L + 6.00 % N/A (6) 07/2017 $ $ (8 ) % $ (8 )
ILC Dover, LP Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.25 % 07/2017 4,407 4,323 1.2 4,319
Whitcraft LLC Subordinated debt N/A 12.00 % 12/2018 1,877 1,848 0.5 1,877
White Oak Technologies, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 03/2017 1,929 1,891 0.5 1,890
White Oak Technologies, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 03/2017 (9 ) (9 )
8,213 8,045 2.2 8,069
Automobile
ABRA, Inc. (5) Subordinated debt N/A N/A (6) 04/2017 (22 )
ABRA, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 12.00 % 04/2017 9,623 9,445 2.6 9,623
American Driveline Systems, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.00 % 01/2016 2,862 2,814 0.7 2,776
American Driveline Systems, Inc. Senior loan P + 4.50 % 7.75 % 01/2016 293 287 0.1 282
CLP Auto Interior Corporation* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 4.97 % 06/2013 3,053 3,053 0.8 2,992
Federal-Mogul Corporation Senior loan L + 1.94 % 2.17 % 12/2014 1,976 1,934 0.5 1,930
Federal-Mogul Corporation Senior loan L + 1.94 % 2.16 % 12/2015 1,008 986 0.3 985
K&N Engineering, Inc. (5) Senior loan P + 4.25 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (6 )
K&N Engineering, Inc. Senior loan P + 4.25 % 7.50 % 12/2016 3,207 3,153 0.9 3,207
22,022 21,644 5.9 21,795
Banking
Prommis Fin Co.* (3) (4) Senior loan L + 10.50 % 10.50 % 06/2015 196 191 167
Prommis Fin Co.* (3) (4) Second lien L + 10.50 % 10.50 % 06/2015 393 382 0.1 259
Prommis Fin Co.* (3) (4) Second lien L + 10.50 % 10.50 % 06/2015 196 191
Prommis Fin Co. Senior loan L + 9.00 % 10.00 % 06/2015 95 93 95
880 857 0.1 521
Beverage, Food and Tobacco
ABP Corporation (5) Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 06/2016 (6 )
ABP Corporation* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 06/2016 4,536 4,470 1.2 4,536
Ameriqual Group, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 03/2016 1,774 1,749 0.4 1,685
Ameriqual Group, LLC* Senior loan L + 7.50 % 9.00 % 03/2016 839 828 0.2 755
Atkins Nutrionals, Inc. Senior loan L + 8.88 % 10.38 % 12/2015 5,028 4,926 1.3 5,028
Candy Intermediate Holdings, Inc. Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.51 % 06/2018 4,987 4,822 1.3 5,050



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

18


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Principal Amount Cost Percentage
of
Net Assets
Fair Value
First Watch Restaurants, Inc. (5) Senior loan P + 6.50 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (30 )
First Watch Restaurants, Inc. (5) Senior loan P + 6.50 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (30 )
First Watch Restaurants, Inc.* Senior loan P + 6.50 % 9.75 % 12/2016 11,530 11,335 3.1 11,530
IL Fornaio (America) Corporation* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 06/2017 4,423 4,405 1.2 4,423
It'Sugar LLC Senior loan L + 8.50 % 10.00 % 04/2017 4,255 4,178 1.1 4,255
It'Sugar LLC Subordinated debt N/A 8.00 % 10/2017 1,707 1,707 0.5 1,707
Julio & Sons Company (5) Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 09/2014 (15 )
Julio & Sons Company* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.00 % 09/2016 7,121 7,065 1.9 7,121
Julio & Sons Company (5) Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 09/2016 (12 )
Richelieu Foods, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.76 % 11/2015 2,111 2,075 0.5 2,048
Richelieu Foods, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 11/2015 (10 ) (18 )
48,311 47,457 12.7 48,120
Broadcasting and Entertainment
Univision Communications Inc. Senior loan L + 2.00 % 2.22 % 09/2014 3,997 3,969 1.1 3,992
Building and Real Estate
ASP PDM Acquisition Co. LLC* Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.75 % 12/2013 453 442 0.1 340
Global Claims Services, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 06/2018 831 819 0.2 831
Global Claims Services, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 06/2018 (1 )
KHKI Acquisition, Inc. Senior loan P + 5.00 % 8.50 % 03/2013 2,626 2,625 0.6 2,101
Tecta America Corp. Senior loan P + 5.75 % 9.00 % 03/2014 3,506 3,506 0.8 2,994
7,416 7,391 1.7 6,266
Cargo Transport
TMW Systems, Inc.* Senior loan P + 3.00 % 6.25 % 05/2016 1,686 1,667 0.4 1,686
Chemicals, Plastics and Rubber
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 14.00 % 04/2015 4,700 4,650 1.3 4,700
Road Infrastructure Investment, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 03/2018 4,137 4,080 1.1 4,142
Road Infrastructure Investment, LLC Senior loan L + 5.00 % 5.46 % 03/2017 231 190 0.1 228
9,068 8,920 2.5 9,070
Containers, Packaging and Glass
Fort Dearborn Company* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.50 % 08/2015 1,349 1,333 0.4 % 1,349
Fort Dearborn Company* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 7.00 % 08/2016 3,159 3,118 0.8 3,159
4,508 4,451 1.2 4,508



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

19


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Schedule of Investments — (Continued)
September 30, 2012
(In thousands)

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Principal Amount Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair Value
Diversified Conglomerate Manufacturing
Oasis Outsourcing Holdings, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 13.00 % 04/2017 11,970 11,775 3.2 11,970
Pasternack
Enterprises, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 4.50 % 6.00 % 02/2014 3,492 3,453 0.9 3,492
Sunless Merger Sub, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.26 % 07/2016 2,322 2,313 0.6 2,322
Sunless Merger Sub, Inc.* Senior loan P + 3.75 % 7.00 % 07/2016 29 28 29
Tecomet Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 7.00 % 12/2016 6,082 5,992 1.6 5,991
Tecomet Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (6 )
TIDI Products, LLC* Senior loan L + 7.00 % 8.25 % 07/2018 8,791 8,606 2.3 8,703
TIDI Products, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 7.00 % N/A (6) 07/2017 (13 ) (8 )
Vintage Parts, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.00 % 8.50 % 12/2013 82 82 82
Vintage Parts, Inc.* Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.75 % 12/2013 1,239 1,228 0.3 1,239
Vintage Parts, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 5.86 % 12/2013 5,934 5,914 1.6 5,934
39,941 39,372 10.5 39,754
Diversified Conglomerate Service
API Healthcare Corporation* Senior loan L + 9.03 % 10.53 % 02/2017 9,587 9,424 2.6 9,587
Consona Holdings, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 6.75 % 08/2018 1,092 1,056 0.3 1,081
Consona Holdings, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.25 % 08/2018 1,567 1,551 0.4 1,551
Consona Holdings, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 08/2017 (3 ) (2 )
Document
Technologies, LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 5.00 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (15 )
Document
Technologies, LLC
Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 12/2016 4,717 4,646 1.3 4,694
EAG, Inc.* Senior loan P + 3.50 % 6.75 % 07/2017 2,629 2,593 0.7 2,629
Employment Law
Training, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 7.50 % N/A (6) 12/2016 (22 )
Employment Law
Training, Inc. *
Senior loan L + 7.50 % 9.00 % 12/2016 18,219 17,822 4.9 18,219
Evolution1, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.25 % 06/2016 4,619 4,567 1.2 4,619
Evolution1, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 4.75 % N/A (6) 06/2016 (19 )
Evolution1, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 4.75 % N/A (6) 06/2016 (4 )
HighJump
Acquisition LLC (5)
Senior loan L + 8.75 % N/A (6) 07/2016 (12 )
HighJump
Acquisition LLC
Senior loan L + 8.75 % 10.00 % 07/2016 5,441 5,379 1.5 5,441
Marathon Data Operating Co., LLC Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.50 % 08/2017 4,818 4,700 1.3 4,746
Marathon Data Operating Co., LLC (5) Senior loan L + 6.25 % N/A (6) 08/2017 (10 ) (10 )
MSC.Software Corporation* Senior loan L + 7.74 % 9.24 % 12/2016 6,238 6,133 1.7 6,238
NS Holdings, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.63 % 6.00 % 06/2015 260 257 0.1 260
NS Holdings, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.27 % 7.68 % 06/2015 1,963 1,941 0.5 1,963
PC Helps Support, LLC Senior loan P + 4.25 % 7.50 % 09/2017 2,390 2,355 0.6 2,354
PC Helps Support, LLC (5) Senior loan P + 4.25 % N/A (6) 09/2017 (3 ) (3 )
Secure-24, LLC Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.50 % 08/2017 9,288 9,061 2.4 9,149
Secure-24, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 6.25 % N/A (6) 08/2017 (8 ) (8 )
Secure-24, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 6.25 % N/A (6) 08/2017 (16 ) (17 )
Sumtotal Systems, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.00 % 5.25 % 12/2015 1,415 1,403 0.4 1,415
74,243 72,776 19.9 73,906



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

20


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Principal Amount Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair Value
Diversified Natural Resources, Precious Metals, and Minerals
Metal Spinners, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 8.00 % 12/2014 1,619 1,578 0.4 1,619
Metal Spinners, Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 8.00 % 12/2014 2,974 2,904 0.8 2,974
4,593 4,482 1.2 4,593
Electronics
Blue Coat Systems, Inc.* Second lien L + 10.00 % 11.50 % 08/2018 5,424 5,277 1.5 5,573
Blue Coat Systems, Inc. Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.50 % 02/2018 8,085 7,940 2.2 8,156
Cape Electrical
Supply LLC* (4)
Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 11/2013 1,465 1,437 0.4 1,465
Ecommerce
Industries, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 6.75 % N/A (6) 10/2016 (27 )
Ecommerce
Industries, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 8.34 % 9.59 % 10/2016 13,530 13,329 3.6 13,530
Entrust, Inc.* Senior loan L + 7.47 % 8.97 % 03/2017 4,053 4,006 1.1 4,053
Entrust, Inc.* Senior loan L + 7.45 % 8.95 % 03/2017 8,046 7,935 2.1 8,046
Rogue Wave
Holdings, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 10.00 % 11.25 % 08/2016 3,982 3,945 1.1 3,982
Syncsort Incorporated (5) Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 03/2015 (4 )
Syncsort Incorporated* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.50 % 03/2015 8,032 7,918 2.1 8,032
Time-O-Matic, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 13.25 % 12/2016 11,561 11,386 3.1 11,561
64,178 63,142 17.2 64,398
Farming and Agriculture
AGData, L.P. Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.75 % 08/2016 2,814 2,782 0.8 2,814
Finance
Bonddesk Group LLC* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 09/2016 1,010 1,002 0.3 1,010
Compass Group Diversified
Holdings, LLC*
Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.25 % 10/2017 8,387 8,025 2.2 8,408
Pillar Processing LLC* (3) Senior loan L + 5.50 % 5.95 % 11/2013 2,412 2,389 0.4 1,361
Pillar Processing LLC* (3) Senior loan N/A 14.50 % 05/2014 3,125 2,947
14,934 14,363 2.9 10,779
Healthcare, Education and Childcare
Advanced Pain Management
Holdings, Inc. (4)
Subordinated debt N/A 14.00 % 06/2016 $ 7,958 $ 7,828 2.1 % $ 7,958
Alegeus Technologies, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 08/2018 873 860 0.2 860
Avatar International, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 7.50 % N/A (6) 09/2016 (8 )
Avatar International, LLC* Senior loan L + 7.50 % 8.75 % 09/2016 7,855 7,747 2.1 7,855
Avatar International, LLC Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.25 % 09/2016 1,695 1,677 0.5 1,695
Campus Management Acquisition Corp. Second lien L + 10.35 % 12.10 % 09/2015 5,067 5,007 1.2 4,662
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. Senior loan L + 3.50 % 3.92 % 01/2017 406 406 0.1 409
Community Hospices of America, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.25 % 12/2015 4,955 4,891 1.3 4,955
Community Hospices of America, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 12/2015 (5 )
Community Hospices of America, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt L + 11.75 % 13.75 % 06/2016 1,874 1,844 0.5 1,874
DDC Center Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 9.50 % 10/2014 8,205 8,211 2.2 8,205
DDC Center Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 9.50 % 12/2012 227 227 0.1 227
DDC Center Inc. Senior loan P + 5.25 % 10.75 % 10/2013 182 182 182



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

21


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Principal Amount Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair Value
Delta Educational
Systems, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.00 % 7.00 % 11/2012 2,740 2,735 0.7 2,685
Dialysis Newco, Inc. (4) Subordinated debt N/A 13.00 % 09/2018 8,795 8,677 2.3 8,795
G & H Wire
Company, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 5.50 % N/A (6) 11/2016 (13 )
G & H Wire
Company, Inc.*
Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.00 % 11/2016 8,974 8,829 2.4 8,839
Hospitalists Management Group, LLC Senior loan L + 4.50 % 6.00 % 05/2017 455 445 0.1 419
Hospitalists Management Group, LLC Senior loan L + 4.50 % 6.00 % 05/2017 3,986 3,909 1.0 3,826
Hospitalists Management Group, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 4.50 % N/A (6) 05/2017 (10 ) (36 )
The Hygenic Corporation* Senior loan L + 2.50 % 2.73 % 04/2013 1,961 1,951 0.5 1,961
IntegraMed
America, Inc. (5)
Senior loan L + 7.25 % N/A (6) 09/2017 (18 ) (16 )
IntegraMed America, Inc. Senior loan L + 7.25 % 8.50 % 09/2017 14,603 14,275 3.8 14,311
Maverick Healthcare Group, LLC Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.25 % 12/2016 2,148 2,123 0.6 2,148
National Healing Corporation Senior loan L + 6.75 % 8.25 % 11/2017 3,569 3,415 1.0 3,569
National Healing Corporation* Second lien L + 10.00 % 11.50 % 11/2018 17,976 16,967 4.8 17,976
NeuroTherm, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.50 % 02/2016 1,591 1,567 0.4 1,591
NeuroTherm, Inc. Senior loan P + 4.00 % 7.25 % 02/2016 124 118 124
Pentec Acquisition Sub, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.50 % 05/2018 2,243 2,200 0.6 2,198
Pentec Acquisition Sub, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 05/2017 (4 ) (4 )
PhysioTherapy Associates Holdings, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.01 % 04/2018 577 566 0.2 578
Reliant Pro ReHab, LLC* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 06/2016 3,601 3,554 1.0 3,601
Reliant Pro ReHab, LLC Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 06/2016 872 858 0.2 872
Reliant Pro ReHab, LLC Senior loan P + 3.75 % 7.00 % 06/2016 550 542 0.1 550
Renaissance Pharma (U.S.) Holdings Inc. Senior loan P + 4.25 % 7.50 % 06/2017 71 65 68
Renaissance Pharma (U.S.) Holdings Inc. Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.76 % 06/2017 2,449 2,402 0.6 2,424
Surgical Information Systems, LLC Second lien L + 7.40 % 8.91 % 12/2015 4,291 4,235 1.1 4,291
WIL Research Company, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 04/2018 792 781 0.2 788
121,665 119,036 31.9 120,440
Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares, and Durable Consumer
Top Knobs USA, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.75 % 7.76 % 11/2016 1,094 1,079 0.3 1,094
WII Components, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.25 % 07/2016 1,732 1,712 0.5 1,732
WII Components, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 4.75 % N/A (6) 07/2016 (1 )
Zenith Products Corporation* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 5.93 % 09/2013 3,409 3,367 0.9 3,239
6,235 6,157 1.7 6,065
Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment
Competitor Group, Inc.* Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.50 % 01/2017 16,807 16,525 4.5 16,807
Competitor Group, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 8.00 % N/A (6) 01/2017 (8 )
Competitor Group, Inc. Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.50 % 01/2017 1,257 1,230 0.3 1,257
Cortz, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.00 % 03/2014 6,609 6,582 1.8 6,609
Octane Fitness, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.00 % 12/2015 4,675 4,552 1.2 4,675



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

22


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Principal Amount Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair Value
Pride Manufacturing Company, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.50 % 7.25 % 11/2015 737 728 0.2 722
The Service Companies* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 9.00 % 03/2014 6,612 6,557 1.8 6,612
36,697 36,166 9.8 36,682
Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals
Benetech, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.00 % 5.22 % 12/2013 8,845 8,737 2.4 8,845
Personal and Non-Durable Consumer Products
Dr. Miracles, Inc.* (4) Senior loan L + 7.50 % 10.00 % 03/2014 3,092 3,077 0.7 % 2,783
Massage Envy, LLC Senior loan L + 7.25 % 8.50 % 09/2018 63 45 47
Massage Envy, LLC Senior loan L + 7.25 % 8.50 % 09/2018 17,061 16,638 4.5 16,804
20,216 19,760 5.2 19,634
Personal, Food and Miscellaneous Services
Affordable Care Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.25 % 12/2015 3,525 3,490 0.9 3,525
Affordable Care Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 4.75 % N/A (6) 12/2015 (6 )
Automatic Bar Controls, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.75 % 7.25 % 03/2016 972 962 0.2 933
Automatic Bar Controls, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.75 % N/A (6) 03/2016 (2 ) (6 )
Brasa (Holdings) Inc.* Senior loan L + 6.25 % 7.50 % 07/2019 5,126 4,976 1.3 5,049
Focus Brands Inc. Second lien L + 9.00 % 10.25 % 08/2018 6,481 6,363 1.8 6,578
Focus Brands Inc. Senior loan L + 5.00 % 6.26 % 02/2018 5,951 5,898 1.6 6,033
Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.25 % 03/2016 4,170 4,101 1.1 4,170
NVA Acquisition Company Senior loan L + 4.25 % 5.50 % 06/2016 1,881 1,867 0.5 1,881
PMI Holdings, Inc.
(Papa Murphys) (5)
Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 06/2017 (3 )
PMI Holdings, Inc.
(Papa Murphys)
Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.51 % 06/2017 2,709 2,683 0.7 2,709
Restaurant Technologies, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 05/2017 1,077 1,069 0.3 1,056
Restaurant Technologies, Inc. Senior loan L + 4.75 % 6.00 % 05/2017 117 116 114
Trusthouse Service Group, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 06/2018 (4 )
Trusthouse Service Group, Inc. Senior loan P + 4.25 % 7.50 % 06/2017 82 77 82
Trusthouse Service Group, Inc. Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 06/2018 2,976 2,926 0.8 2,976
Vetcor Merger Sub LLC* Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.50 % 02/2015 9,646 9,646 2.6 9,646
44,713 44,159 11.8 44,746
Personal Transportation
PODS Funding Corp. II (4) Subordinated debt N/A 21.00 % 11/2017 2,802 2,802 0.7 2,802
PODS Funding Corp. II (4) Subordinated debt N/A 21.00 % 11/2017 579 579 0.2 579
PODS Funding Corp. II (4) Second lien N/A 15.50 % 05/2017 447 441 0.1 447
PODS Funding Corp. II (4) Second lien N/A 15.50 % 05/2017 2,096 2,045 0.6 2,096
PODS Funding Corp. II Senior loan L + 7.00 % 8.50 % 11/2016 773 753 0.2 773
PODS Funding Corp. II* Senior loan L + 7.00 % 8.50 % 11/2016 5,955 5,807 1.6 5,955
12,652 12,427 3.4 12,652
Printing and Publishing
Digital Technology International, LLC. Senior loan P + 6.00 % 9.25 % 09/2016 928 921 0.2 928
Digital Technology International, LLC. Senior loan L + 7.25 % 8.75 % 09/2016 6,333 6,230 1.7 6,333
Market Track, LLC* Senior loan L + 6.11 % 7.36 % 08/2018 3,150 3,104 0.8 3,103
Market Track, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 6.11 % N/A (6) 08/2018 (6 ) (6)



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

23


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above Index (1) Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Principal Amount Cost Percentage
of Total
Net Assets
Fair Value
Market Track, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 7.65 % N/A (6) 08/2018 (4 ) (4 )
Trade Service Company, LLC* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.75 % 06/2013 1,026 1,024 0.3 1,026
Trade Service Company, LLC* (4) Senior loan N/A 14.00 % 06/2013 765 764 0.2 765
Trade Service Company, LLC Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 06/2013
12,202 12,033 3.2 12,145
Retail Stores
Barcelona Restaurants, LLC* Senior loan L + 10.00 % 11.50 % 03/2017 4,964 4,878 1.3 4,964
Barcelona Restaurants, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 10.00 % N/A (6) 03/2017 (5 )
Benihana, Inc. Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.25 % 08/2017 365 329 0.1 335
Benihana, Inc.* Senior loan L + 8.00 % 9.25 % 02/2018 13,456 13,108 3.5 13,166
Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc.* Senior loan P + 5.50 % 8.75 % 08/2017 2,761 2,597 0.7 2,767
Chuy's OPCO, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 7.00 % N/A (6) 05/2016 (2 )
Chuy's OPCO, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 7.00 % N/A (6) 05/2016 (9 )
Chuy's OPCO, Inc. Senior loan L + 7.00 % 8.50 % 05/2016 942 929 0.3 942
DTLR, Inc. (fka Levtran)* Senior loan L + 8.00 % 11.00 % 12/2015 7,904 7,806 2.1 7,904
The Marshall Retail Group, LLC (5) Senior loan L + 6.50 % N/A (6) 10/2016 (15 )
The Marshall Retail Group, LLC* Senior loan L + 6.50 % 8.00 % 10/2016 10,414 10,238 2.8 10,414
Michaels Stores, Inc. Senior loan L + 2.25 % 2.69 % 10/2013 2,917 2,920 0.8 2,932
Restaurant Holding Company, LLC Senior loan L + 7.50 % 9.00 % 02/2017 9,517 9,350 2.6 9,660
Rubio's Restaurants, Inc* (4) Senior loan L + 7.75 % 9.50 % 06/2015 8,246 8,149 2.2 8,246
Specialty Catalog Corp. Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.50 % 07/2017 5,396 5,326 1.4 5,342
Specialty Catalog Corp. (5) Senior loan L + 6.00 % N/A (6) 07/2017 (8 ) (8 )
Vision Source L.P. (5) Senior loan L + 6.75 % N/A (6) 04/2016 (9 )
Vision Source L.P.* Senior loan L + 6.75 % 8.00 % 04/2016 13,201 13,007 3.5 13,201
80,083 78,589 21.3 79,865
Telecommunications
Hosting.com, Inc.* Senior loan L + 4.50 % 5.76 % 10/2016 846 836 0.2 846
Hosting.com, Inc. (5) Senior loan L + 4.50 % N/A (6) 10/2016 (2 )
NameMedia, Inc. Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.50 % 11/2014 28 27 28
NameMedia, Inc. Senior loan L + 6.00 % 7.50 % 11/2014 2,159 2,131 0.6 2,159
West Corporation (5) Senior loan L + 1.75 % N/A (6) 10/2012 (8 )
3,033 2,984 0.8 3,033
Utilities
PowerPlan Consultants, Inc. (3) Senior loan L + 5.25 % N/A (6) 03/2017 (2 )
PowerPlan Consultants, Inc.* Senior loan L + 5.25 % 6.76 % 03/2018 5,164 5,093 1.4 5,164
5,164 5,091 1.4 5,164
Total debt investments United States
$ 658,309 $ 646,457 173.2 % $ 649,542
Fair Value as a percentage of Principal Amount
98.7 %



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

24


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Schedule of Investments — (Continued)
September 30, 2012
(In thousands)

Investment
Type
Spread Above
Index (1)
Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Principal
Amount/
Shares/
Contracts
Cost Percentage of Total Net Assets Fair Value
Equity investments
Aerospace and Defense
Whitcraft LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 $ 670 0.2 % $ 753
Whitcraft LLC Warrant N/A N/A N/A 147
670 0.2 900
Automobile
ABRA, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 208 1,471 0.4 1,688
K&N Engineering, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 4 4
K&N Engineering, Inc. Preferred stock A N/A N/A N/A 62 62
K&N Engineering, Inc. Preferred stock B N/A N/A N/A 18 18
1,555 0.4 1,772
Banking
Prommis Solutions Inc.* Preferred LLC
interest
N/A N/A N/A 1 472
Prommis Solutions Inc.* A-1 LLC interset N/A N/A N/A
Prommis Solutions Inc.* A-2 LLC interest N/A N/A N/A
472
Beverage, Food and Tobacco
Atkins Nutrionals, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 57 796 0.3 1,063
First Watch
Restaurants, Inc.
Common stock N/A N/A N/A 7 691 0.2 691
Julio & Sons Company LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 521 521 0.2 619
Richelieu Foods, Inc. LP interest N/A N/A N/A 220 220 0.1 193
2,228 0.8 2,566
Diversified Conglomerate Manufacturing
Oasis Outsourcing Holdings, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 1,088 1,088 0.4 1,385
Sunless Merger Sub, Inc. Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 148 129
TIDI Products, LLC LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 315 315 0.1 315
1,551 0.5 1,829
Diversified Conglomerate Service
Document
Technologies, LLC
LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 24 490 0.1 490
Employment Law Training, Inc. LP interest N/A N/A N/A 666 0.2 757
Marathon Data Operating Co., LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 264 0.1 264
Marathon Data Operating Co., LLC Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 1 264 0.1 264
PC Helps Support, LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 7 7
PC Helps Support, LLC Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 61 61
Secure-24, LLC LLC Units N/A N/A N/A 253 253 0.1 253
2,005 0.6 2,096
Finance
Pillar Processing LLC* N/A N/A N/A
Healthcare, Education and Childcare
Advanced Pain Management Holdings, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 67 67
Advanced Pain Management Holdings, Inc. Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 13 1,273 0.4 1,369
Avatar International, LLC LP interest N/A N/A N/A 1 695 0.2 695
Dialysis Newco, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 871 871 0.2 871
G & H Wire Company, Inc. LP interest N/A N/A N/A 102 102



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

25


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment
Type
Spread Above
Index (1)
Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Principal
Amount/
Shares/
Contracts
Cost Percentage of Total Net Assets Fair Value
Hospitalists Management Group, LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 38 38
IntegraMed America, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 514 0.1 514
National Healing Corporation Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 695 799 0.3 1,127
NeuroTherm, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 569 0.2 569
Pentec Healthcare
Infusions, Inc.
Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 1 116 116
Reliant Pro ReHab, LLC Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 2 264 0.1 263
Surgical Information Systems, LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 4 414 0.1 414
5,722 1.6 6,078
Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares, and Durable Consumer
Top Knobs USA, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 3 73 73
Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment
Competitor Group, Inc. Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 12 88 0.1 193
Competitor Group, Inc. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 87 107
175 0.1 300
Personal and Non-Durable Consumer Products
Massage Envy, LLC LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 749 749 0.2 749
Personal Transportation
PODS Funding Corp. II Warrant N/A N/A N/A 271
Printing and Publishing
Market Track, LLC Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 145 145
Market Track, LLC Common stock N/A N/A N/A 1 145 145
290 290
Retail Stores
Barcelona Restaurants, LLC LP interest N/A N/A N/A 1,996 1,996 0.7 2,538
Benihana, Inc. LLC interest N/A N/A N/A 43 699 0.2 699
Rubio's Restaurants, Inc. Preferred stock N/A N/A N/A 199 945 0.2 599
Vision Source L.P. Common stock N/A N/A N/A 9 936 0.2 936
4,576 1.3 4,772
Total equity investments United States
$ 20,066 5.7 % $ 21,425
Total United States
$ 666,523 178.9 % $ 670,967
Total investments
$ 669,841 179.4 % $ 672,910

* Denotes that all or a portion of the loan secures the notes offered in the Debt Securitization (as defined
in Note 6).
(1) The majority of the investments bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to LIBOR or Prime and which reset daily, quarterly or semiannually. For each we have provided the spread over LIBOR or Prime and the weighted average current interest rate in effect at September 30, 2012. Certain investments are subject to a LIBOR or Prime interest rate floor. For fixed rate loans, a spread above a reference rate is not applicable.
(2) For portfolio companies with multiple interest rate contracts, the interest rate shown is a weighted average current interest rate in effect at September 30, 2012.
(3) Loan was on non-accrual status as of September 30, 2012, meaning that the Company has ceased recognizing interest income on the loan.
(4) A portion of the interest may be deferred through a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) rate option.
(5) The negative fair value is the result of the capitalized discount on the loan or the unfunded commitment being valued below par. The negative cost is the result of the capitalized discount being greater than the principal amount outstanding on the loan.
(6) The entire commitment was unfunded at September 30, 2012. As such, no interest is being earned on this investment.



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

26


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 1. Organization

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (“GBDC” and, collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) is an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company. GBDC has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). In addition, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, GBDC has elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

On April 13, 2010, Golub Capital BDC LLC (“GBDC LLC”) converted from a Delaware limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, leaving GBDC as the surviving entity (the “Conversion”). At the time of the Conversion, all limited liability company interests were exchanged for 8,984,863 shares of common stock in GBDC. GBDC had no assets or operations prior to the Conversion and, as a result, the books and records of GBDC LLC have become the books and records of the surviving entity. On April 14, 2010, GBDC completed its initial public offering (the “Offering”).

GBDC LLC was formed in the State of Delaware on November 9, 2009 to continue and expand the business of Golub Capital Master Funding LLC (“GCMF”) which commenced operations on July 7, 2007. All of the outstanding limited liability company interests in GCMF were initially held by three Delaware limited liability companies, Golub Capital Company IV, LLC, Golub Capital Company V LLC and Golub Capital Company VI LLC (collectively, the “Capital Companies”). In November 2009, the Capital Companies formed GBDC LLC, into which they contributed 100% of the limited liability company interests of GCMF and from which they received a proportionate number of limited liability company interests in GBDC LLC. In February 2010, GEMS Fund L.P. (“GEMS”), a limited partnership affiliated through common management with the Capital Companies, purchased an interest in GBDC LLC. As a result of the Conversion, the Capital Companies and GEMS received shares of common stock in GBDC.

Subsequent to the Conversion, GCMF became a wholly owned subsidiary of GBDC. GCMF’s financial results are consolidated with GBDC, and the portfolio investments held by GCMF are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The Company’s investment strategy is to invest in senior secured, one stop (a loan that combines characteristics of traditional first lien senior secured loans and second lien or subordinated loans), second lien and subordinated (a loan that ranks senior only to a borrower’s equity securities and ranks junior to all of such borrower’s other indebtedness in priority of payment) loans and warrants and equity securities to middle market companies that are, in most cases, sponsored by private equity investors. The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) with GC Advisors LLC (the “Investment Adviser”), under which the Investment Adviser manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to, the Company. Prior to April 14, 2010, Golub Capital Incorporated (the “Investment Manager”) served as the investment adviser for the Company.

Note 2. Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Updates

Basis of presentation: The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements of the Company and related financial information have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Articles 6 or 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications consisting solely of normal accruals that are necessary for the fair presentation of financial results as of and for the periods presented. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

27


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 2. Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Updates  – (continued)

Fair value of financial instruments: The Company applies fair value to all of its financial instruments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework used to measure fair value and requires disclosures for fair value measurements. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, the Company has categorized its financial instruments carried at fair value, based on the priority of the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of the market participant who holds the financial instrument rather than an entity specific measure. Therefore, when market assumptions are not readily available, the Company’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that management believes market participants would use in pricing the financial instrument at the measurement date.

The availability of observable inputs can vary depending on the financial instrument and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of product, whether the product is new, whether the product is traded on an active exchange or in the secondary market and the current market conditions. To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for financial instruments classified as Level 3.

Any changes to the valuation methodology are reviewed by management and the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) to confirm that the changes are justified. As markets change, new products develop and the pricing for products becomes more or less transparent, the Company will continue to refine its valuation methodologies.

Use of estimates: The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Consolidation: As permitted under Regulation S-X and ASC Topic 946 — Financial Services — Investment Companies , the Company will generally not consolidate its investment in a company other than an investment company subsidiary or a controlled operating company whose business consists of providing services to the Company. Accordingly, the Company consolidated the results of the Company’s subsidiaries in its consolidated financial statements.

Assets related to transactions that do not meet ASC Topic 860 — Transfers and Servicing requirements for accounting sale treatment are reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition as investments. Those assets are owned by special purpose entities that are consolidated in the Company’s financial statements. The creditors of the special purpose entities have received security interests in such assets and such assets are not intended to be available to the creditors of the Company (or any affiliate of the Company).

Cash and cash equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition. The Company deposits its cash in financial institutions and, at times, such balances may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.

Restricted cash and cash equivalents: Restricted cash and cash equivalents include amounts that are collected and are held by trustees who have been appointed as custodians of the assets securing certain of the Company’s financing transactions. Restricted cash is held by the trustees for payment of interest expense and principal on the outstanding borrowings or reinvestment into new assets. In addition, restricted cash and cash equivalents include amounts held within the Company’s small business investment companies (“SBICs”).

28


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 2. Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Updates  – (continued)

This amount is generally restricted to the originations of new loans from the SBICs and the payment of U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) debentures and related interest expense.

Revenue recognition:

Investments and related investment income: Interest income is accrued based upon the outstanding principal amount and contractual interest terms of debt investments. In addition, the Company may generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, amendment, structuring or due diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance and consulting fees. Loan origination fees, original issue discount and market discount or premium are capitalized, and the Company accretes or amortizes such amounts over the life of the loan as interest income. All other income is recorded into income when earned. The Company records prepayment premiums on loans as interest income. When the Company receives principal payments on a loan in an amount that exceeds the loan’s accreted or amortized cost, it records the excess principal payment as interest income. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, interest income included $2,440 and $1,090, respectively, of accretion of discounts.

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, the Company had interest receivable of $3,245 and $3,906, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company earned interest of $18,327 and $12,100, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company received interest in cash, which excludes income from amortization of loan origination fees, original issue discount and market discount or premium, in the amounts of $16,306 and $10,610, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company received loan origination fees of $3,734 and $3,904, respectively. These loan origination fees are capitalized and amortized or accreted over the life of the loan as interest income.

For investments with contractual PIK interest, which represents contractual interest accrued and added to the principal balance that generally becomes due at maturity, the Company will not accrue PIK interest if the portfolio company valuation indicates that the PIK interest is not collectible. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company capitalized $1,037 and $287, respectively, of PIK interest into the principal balance. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company received PIK payments in cash of $332 and $102, respectively.

Dividend income on preferred equity securities is recorded as dividend income on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are payable by the portfolio company and are expected to be collected. Dividend income on common equity securities is recorded on the record date for private portfolio companies or on the ex-dividend date for publicly traded portfolio companies. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded dividend income of $267 and $377, respectively.

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Realized gains or losses on investments are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the disposition and the cost basis of investment, without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized. The Company reports current period changes in fair value of investments that are measured at fair value as a component of the net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the consolidated statements of operations.

Non-accrual loans: A loan may be left on accrual status during the period the Company is pursuing repayment of the loan. Management reviews all loans that become 90 days or more past due on principal and interest, or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected, for possible placement on non-accrual status. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, unpaid interest credited to income is reversed. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in management’s judgment, are likely to remain current. The total fair value of non-accrual loans was $2,493 and $3,222 as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

29


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 2. Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Updates  – (continued)

Income taxes: The Company has elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and operates in a manner so as to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs. In order to qualify as a RIC, among other things, the Company is required to meet certain source of income and asset diversification requirements and timely distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each year. The Company has made, and intends to continue to make, the requisite distributions to its stockholders, which will generally relieve the Company from U.S. federal income taxes with respect to all income distributed to its stockholders.

Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to retain taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next tax year in an amount less than what would trigger payments of federal income tax under subchapter M of the Code. The Company would then pay a 4% excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income may exceed estimated current year dividend distributions, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, no amount was recorded for U.S. federal excise tax.

The Company accounts for income taxes in conformity with ASC Topic 740 — Income Taxes . ASC Topic 740 provides guidelines for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in financial statements. ASC Topic 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. It is the Company’s policy to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax benefits in income tax expense. There were no material uncertain income tax positions through December 31, 2012. The 2009, 2010 and 2011 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal and most state tax authorities.

Dividends and distributions: Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded on the declaration date. The amount to be paid out as a dividend or distribution is determined by the Board each quarter and is generally based upon the earnings estimated by management. Net realized capital gains, if any, are distributed at least annually, although the Company may decide to retain such capital gains for investment.

The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) that provides for reinvestment of any distributions the Company declares in cash on behalf of its stockholders, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash. As a result, if the Board authorizes and the Company declares a cash distribution, then stockholders who have not “opted out” of the DRIP will have their cash distribution automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock, rather than receiving the cash dividend. The Company may use newly issued shares under the guidelines of the DRIP (if the Company’s shares are trading at a premium to net asset value), or the Company may purchase shares in the open market in connection with the obligations under the plan. In particular, if the Company’s shares are trading at a significant discount to net asset value and the Company is otherwise permitted under applicable law to purchase such shares, the Company intends to purchase shares in the open market in connection with any obligations under the DRIP.

In the event the market price per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of a distribution exceeds the most recently computed net asset value per share of the common stock, the Company will issue shares of common stock to participants in the DRIP at the greater of the most recently computed net asset value per share of common stock or 95% of the current market price per share of common stock (or such lesser discount to the current market price per share that still exceeds the most recently computed net asset value per share of common stock).

30


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 2. Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Updates  – (continued)

Deferred financing costs: Deferred financing costs represent fees and other direct incremental costs incurred in connection with the Company’s borrowings. As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, the Company had deferred financing costs of $6,373 and $5,898, respectively. These amounts are amortized and included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the estimated average life of the borrowings. Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $366 and $340, respectively.

Deferred offering costs: Deferred offering costs consist of fees paid in relation to legal, accounting, regulatory and printing work completed in preparation of equity offerings. Deferred offering costs are charged against the proceeds from equity offerings when received. As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, deferred offering costs, which are included in other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition, were $252 and $130, respectively.

Note 3. Related Party Transactions

Investment Advisory Agreement: On April 14, 2010, GBDC entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Investment Adviser, under which the Investment Adviser manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to, GBDC. The Investment Advisory Agreement was subsequently amended on July 16, 2010. The Board most recently reapproved the Investment Advisory Agreement on February 5, 2013. The Investment Adviser is a registered investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

The Investment Adviser also sponsors or manages, and may in the future sponsor or manage, other investment funds, accounts or investment vehicles, together referred to as accounts, that have investment mandates that are similar, in whole and in part, with the Company. The Investment Adviser and its affiliates may determine that an investment is appropriate for the Company and for one or more of those other accounts. In such event, depending on the availability of such investment and other appropriate factors, and pursuant to the Investment Adviser’s allocation policy, the Investment Adviser or its affiliates may determine that the Company should invest side-by-side with one or more other accounts. The Company does not intend to make any investments if they are not permitted by applicable law and interpretive positions of the SEC and its staff, or if they are inconsistent with the Investment Adviser’s allocation procedures.

The Investment Adviser receives fees for providing services, consisting of two components, a base management fee and an Incentive Fee (as defined below).

The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate equal to 1.375% of average adjusted gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters (including assets purchased with borrowed funds and securitization-related assets, leverage, unrealized depreciation or appreciation on derivative instruments and cash collateral on deposit with custodian but adjusted to exclude cash and cash equivalents so that investors do not pay the base management fee on such assets) and is payable quarterly in arrears. Such amount is adjusted, based on the actual number of days elapsed relative to the total number of days in such calendar quarter, for any share issuances or repurchases during such calendar quarter. For purposes of the Investment Advisory Agreement, cash equivalents means U.S. government securities and commercial paper instruments maturing within 270 days of purchase (which is different than the GAAP definition, which defines cash equivalents as U.S. government securities and commercial paper instruments maturing within 90 days of purchase). To the extent that the Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates provides investment advisory, collateral management or other similar services to a subsidiary of the Company, the base management fee will be reduced by an amount equal to the product of (1) the total fees paid to the Investment Adviser by such subsidiary for such services and (2) the percentage of such subsidiary’s total equity, including membership interests and any class of notes not exclusively held by one or more third parties, that is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company.

31


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 3. Related Party Transactions  – (continued)

The Company has structured the calculation of the Incentive Fee to include a fee limitation such that an Incentive Fee for any quarter can only be paid to the Investment Adviser if, after such payment, the cumulative Incentive Fees paid to the Investment Adviser since April 13, 2010, the effective date of the Company’s election to become a BDC, would be less than or equal to 20.0% of the Company’s Cumulative Pre-Incentive Fee Net Income (as defined below).

The Company accomplishes this limitation by subjecting each quarterly Incentive Fee payable under the Income and Capital Gain Incentive Fee Calculation (as defined below) to a cap (the “Incentive Fee Cap”). The Incentive Fee Cap in any quarter is equal to the difference between (a) 20.0% of Cumulative Pre-Incentive Fee Net Income and (b) cumulative Incentive Fees of any kind paid to the Investment Adviser by GBDC since April 13, 2010. To the extent the Incentive Fee Cap is zero or a negative value in any quarter, no Incentive Fee would be payable in that quarter. “Cumulative Pre-Incentive Fee Net Income” is equal to the sum of (a) Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (as defined below) for each period since April 13, 2010 and (b) cumulative aggregate realized capital gains, cumulative aggregate realized capital losses, cumulative aggregate unrealized capital depreciation and cumulative aggregate unrealized capital appreciation since April 13, 2010.

“Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company receives from portfolio companies but excluding fees for providing managerial assistance) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus operating expenses for the calendar quarter (including the base management fee, taxes, any expenses payable under the Investment Advisory Agreement and an administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with GC Service Company, LLC (including, as the context may require, Golub Capital LLC, after the assignment of the Administration Agreement to Golub Capital LLC on February 5, 2013, the “Administrator”), any expenses of securitizations and any interest expense and dividends paid on any outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the Incentive Fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature such as market discount, debt instruments with PIK interest, preferred stock with PIK dividends and zero coupon securities, accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash.

Incentive Fees are calculated and payable quarterly in arrears (or, upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date).

The income and capital gains incentive fee calculation (the “Income and Capital Gain Incentive Fee Calculation”) has two parts, the income component (the “Income Incentive Fee”) and the capital gains component (the “Capital Gain Incentive Fee” and, together with the Income Incentive Fee, the “Incentive Fee”). The Income Incentive Fee is calculated quarterly in arrears based on the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. As described in Note 7 — Derivative Instruments, in June 2011, the Company entered into a total return swap (the “TRS”) with Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) for the purpose of gaining economic exposure to a portfolio of broadly syndicated loans. The TRS was subsequently terminated on April 11, 2012. For purposes of the computation of the Incentive Fee, the Company:

treated the interest spread, which represents the difference between the interest and fees received on the reference assets underlying the TRS and the interest paid to Citibank on the settled notional value of the TRS, as part of the Income Incentive Fee; and
treated the realized gains and losses on the sale or maturity of reference assets underlying the TRS and futures contracts as part of the Capital Gain Incentive Fee.

32


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 3. Related Party Transactions  – (continued)

For the periods ending on or prior to September 30, 2011, the Company had included interest spread payments from the TRS in the Capital Gain Incentive Fee as this is consistent with GAAP, which records such payments in net realized gains/(losses) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statement of operations. However, the Company changed its methodology in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 pursuant to discussions with the staff of the SEC, resulting in the TRS interest spread payments being included in the Income Incentive Fee.

For the three months ended December 31, 2011, including the interest spread payments from the TRS in the Income Incentive Fee caused an increase in the Incentive Fee by $647 as the Company was in the “catch-up” provision as described below. Upon reviewing the Income and Capital Gain Incentive Fee Calculation and the treatment of the interest spread payments from the TRS, the Investment Adviser irrevocably waived the incremental portion of the Incentive Fee attributable from the TRS interest spread payments for the three months ended December 31, 2011. For the three months ended December 31, 2011, after taking into account the waiver by the Investment Adviser, the Income Incentive Fee was $909, rather than $1,556.

For the three months ended December 31, 2012 the Income Incentive Fee was $2,394.

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Because of the structure of the Income Incentive Fee, it is possible that an Incentive Fee may be calculated under this formula with respect to a period in which the Company has incurred a loss. For example, if the Company receives Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income in excess of the hurdle rate (as defined below) for a calendar quarter, the Income Incentive Fee will result in a positive value and an Incentive Fee will be paid unless the payment of such Incentive Fee would cause the Company to pay Incentive Fees on a cumulative basis that exceed 20.0% of Cumulative Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the Company’s net assets (defined as total assets less indebtedness and before taking into account any Incentive Fees payable during the period) at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a fixed “hurdle rate” of 2.0% quarterly. If market interest rates rise, the Company may be able to invest funds in debt instruments that provide for a higher return, which would increase Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income and make it easier for the Investment Adviser to surpass the fixed hurdle rate and receive an Incentive Fee based on such net investment income. The Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income used to calculate this part of the Incentive Fee is also included in the amount of its total assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds and securitization-related assets, unrealized depreciation or appreciation on derivative instruments and cash collateral on deposit with custodian) used to calculate the 1.375% base management fee annual rate.

The Company calculates the Income Incentive Fee with respect to its Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income quarterly, in arrears, as follows:

Zero in any calendar quarter in which the Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate;
100% of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 2.5% in any calendar quarter. This portion of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 2.5%) is referred to as the “catch-up” provision. The catch-up is meant to provide the Investment Adviser with 20.0% of the Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply if this net investment income exceeds 2.5% in any calendar quarter; and
20.0% of the amount of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any calendar quarter.

33


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 3. Related Party Transactions  – (continued)

The sum of these calculations yields the “Income Incentive Fee”. This amount is appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the quarter.

The Capital Gain Incentive Fee equals (a) 20.0% of the Company’s Capital Gain Incentive Fee Base (as defined below), if any, calculated in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), which commenced with the calendar year ending December 31, 2010, less (b) the aggregate amount of any previously paid Capital Gain Incentive Fees. The Company’s “Capital Gain Incentive Fee Base” equals the sum of (1) realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative positive basis from the date the Company elected to become a BDC through the end of each calendar year, (2) all realized capital losses on a cumulative basis and (3) all unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis.

The cumulative aggregate realized capital losses are calculated as the sum of the amounts by which (a) the net sales price of each investment in the Company’s portfolio when sold is less than (b) the accreted or amortized cost base of such investment.
The cumulative aggregate realized capital gains are calculated as the sum of the differences, if positive, between (a) the net sales price of each investment in the Company’s portfolio when sold and (b) the accreted or amortized cost basis of such investment.
The aggregate unrealized capital depreciation is calculated as the sum of the differences, if negative, between (a) the valuation of each investment in the Company’s portfolio as of the applicable Capital Gain Incentive Fee calculation date and (b) the accreted or amortized cost basis of such investment.

The Company accrues the Capital Gain Incentive Fee if, on a cumulative basis, the sum of net realized gains and (losses) plus net unrealized appreciation and (depreciation) is positive. The Capital Gain Incentive Fee is calculated on a cumulative basis from April 13, 2012 through the end of each calendar year. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Capital Gain Incentive Fee was zero.

The sum of the Income Incentive Fee and the Capital Gain Incentive Fee is the “Incentive Fee.”

As described above, the Incentive Fee will not be paid at any time if, after such payment, the cumulative Incentive Fees paid to date would be greater than 20.0% of the Company’s Cumulative Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income since the effective date of the Company’s election to be treated as a BDC. Such amount, less any Incentive Fees previously paid, is referred to as the “Incentive Fee Cap.” If, for any relevant period, the Incentive Fee Cap calculation results in the Company paying less than the amount of the Incentive Fee calculated above, then the difference between the Incentive Fee and the Incentive Fee Cap will not be paid by GBDC and will not be received by the Investment Adviser as an Incentive Fee either at the end of such relevant period or at the end of any future period.

Administration Agreement: GBDC has also entered into the Administration Agreement. Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator furnishes GBDC with office facilities and equipment, provides GBDC with clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such facilities and provides GBDC with other administrative services as the Administrator, subject to review by the Board, determines necessary to conduct GBDC’s day-to-day operations. GBDC reimburses the Administrator the allocable portion (subject to the review and approval of the Board) of overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent, fees and expenses associated with performing compliance functions and GBDC’s allocable portion of the cost of its chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs. As permitted by the Administration Agreement, beginning January 1, 2012, the Administrator began charging the allocable portion of the cost of the Company’s chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs to the Company. The Board reviews such expenses to determine that these expenses are reasonable and comparable to administrative services charged by unaffiliated third party asset managers. Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator

34


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 3. Related Party Transactions  – (continued)

also provides on the Company’s behalf significant managerial assistance to those portfolio companies to which GBDC is required to provide such assistance and will be paid an additional amount based on the cost of the services provided, not to exceed the amount GBDC receives from such portfolio companies.

Included in accounts payable and accrued expenses is $548 and $507 as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively, for accrued allocated shared services under the Administration Agreement. The administrative service fee expense under the Administration Agreement for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $548 and $262, respectively.

Other related party transactions: The Investment Manager pays for certain unaffiliated third-party expenses incurred by the Company. Such expenses include postage, printing, office supplies and rating agency fees. These expenses are not marked-up and represent the same amount the Company would have paid had the Company paid the expenses directly. These expenses are subsequently reimbursed in cash.

Total expenses reimbursed to the Investment Manager during the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were zero and $106, respectively.

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses were $330 and $40, respectively, for accrued expenses paid on behalf of the Company by the Investment Manager.

Note 4. Investments

Investments consisted of the following:

December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012
Par Cost Fair Value Par Cost Fair Value
Senior secured $ 255,248 $ 250,874 $ 248,890 $ 280,579 $ 275,736 $ 273,989
One stop 366,734 360,274 363,560 267,393 262,876 265,705
Second lien (1) 81,917 79,950 81,446 44,856 43,348 44,367
Subordinated debt 51,846 51,099 49,607 68,859 67,815 67,424
Equity N/A 23,429 24,839 N/A 20,066 21,425
Total $ 755,745 $ 765,626 $ 768,342 $ 661,687 $ 669,841 $ 672,910

(1) Second lien loans include loans structured as first lien last out term loans.

35


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 4. Investments  – (continued)

The Company has invested in portfolio companies located in the United States and in Canada. The following tables show the portfolio composition by geographic region at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments in portfolio companies. The geographic composition is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company, which may not be indicative of the primary source of the portfolio company’s business.

December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012
Cost:
United States
Mid-Atlantic $ 121,209 15.8 % $ 76,509 11.5 %
Midwest 171,245 22.4 152,119 22.7
West 113,031 14.8 120,228 17.9
Southeast 210,675 27.5 178,316 26.6
Southwest 95,402 12.5 84,424 12.6
Northeast 50,658 6.6 54,927 8.2
Canada 3,406 0.4 3,318 0.5
Total $ 765,626 100.0 % $ 669,841 100.0 %
Fair Value:
United States
Mid-Atlantic $ 119,083 15.5 % $ 72,671 10.8 %
Midwest 171,566 22.3 152,527 22.6
West 113,365 14.8 122,371 18.2
Southeast 214,392 27.9 181,398 27.0
Southwest 96,746 12.6 85,633 12.7
Northeast 52,305 6.8 56,367 8.4
Canada 885 0.1 1,943 0.3
Total $ 768,342 100.0 % $ 672,910 100.0 %

36


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 4. Investments  – (continued)

The industry compositions of the portfolio at fair value, excluding derivative instruments, were as follows:

December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012
Cost:
Aerospace and Defense $ 18,075 2.4 % $ 8,715 1.3 %
Automobile 26,250 3.4 23,199 3.5
Banking 1,355 0.2 1,329 0.2
Beverage, Food and Tobacco 51,528 6.7 49,685 7.4
Broadcasting and Entertainment 3,969 0.6
Buildings and Real Estate 7,663 1.0 7,391 1.1
Cargo Transport 9,310 1.2 1,667 0.2
Chemicals, Plastics and Rubber 6,154 0.8 8,920 1.3
Containers, Packaging and Glass 3,687 0.5 4,451 0.7
Diversified Conglomerate Manufacturing 37,909 5.0 40,923 6.1
Diversified Conglomerate Service 94,716 12.4 74,781 11.2
Diversified Natural Resources, Precious Metals and Minerals 4,307 0.6 4,482 0.7
Electronics 62,518 8.2 63,142 9.4
Farming and Agriculture 2,745 0.4 2,782 0.4
Finance 31,317 4.1 14,363 2.2
Healthcare, Education and Childcare 129,710 16.9 124,758 18.6
Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer 7,238 0.9 6,230 0.9
Insurance 9,769 1.3
Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment 43,912 5.7 39,659 5.9
Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals 6,499 0.8 8,737 1.3
Personal and Non-Durable Consumer Products 27,357 3.6 20,509 3.1
Personal, Food and Miscellaneous Services 46,095 6.0 12,427 1.9
Personal Transportation 13,868 1.8 44,159 6.6
Printing and Publishing 12,177 1.6 12,323 1.8
Retail Stores 104,345 13.6 83,165 12.4
Telecommunications 2,159 0.3 2,984 0.4
Utilities 4,963 0.6 5,091 0.8
Total $ 765,626 100.0 % $ 669,841 100.0 %
Fair Value:
Aerospace and Defense $ 18,428 2.4 % $ 8,969 1.3 %
Automobile 26,616 3.4 23,567 3.5
Banking 414 0.1 521 0.1
Beverage, Food and Tobacco 52,936 6.9 50,686 7.5
Broadcasting and Entertainment 3,992 0.6
Buildings and Real Estate 6,010 0.8 6,266 0.9
Cargo Transport 9,590 1.2 1,686 0.3
Chemicals, Plastics and Rubber 6,299 0.8 9,070 1.3
Containers, Packaging and Glass 3,718 0.5 4,508 0.7
Diversified Conglomerate Manufacturing 38,326 5.0 41,583 6.2
Diversified Conglomerate Service 96,202 12.5 76,002 11.3
Diversified Natural Resources, Precious Metals and Minerals 4,401 0.5 4,593 0.7
Electronics 63,174 8.2 64,398 9.6
Farming and Agriculture 2,774 0.3 2,814 0.4
Finance 29,049 3.8 10,779 1.6
Healthcare, Education and Childcare 131,826 17.2 126,518 18.8
Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer 6,952 0.9 6,138 0.9
Insurance 9,837 1.3
Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment 41,557 5.4 38,925 5.8
Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals 6,497 0.8 8,845 1.3
Personal and Non-Durable Consumer Products 27,488 3.6 20,383 3.0
Personal, Food and Miscellaneous Services 46,807 6.1 44,746 6.6
Personal Transportation 14,246 1.9 12,652 1.9
Printing and Publishing 12,066 1.6 12,435 1.8
Retail Stores 105,913 13.8 84,637 12.6
Telecommunications 2,186 0.3 3,033 0.5
Utilities 5,030 0.7 5,164 0.8
Total $ 768,342 100.0 % $ 672,910 100.0 %

37


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 5. Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows ASC Topic 820 for measuring fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received in the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters, or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation models involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the assets or liabilities or market and the assets’ or liabilities’ complexity. The Company’s fair value analysis includes an analysis of the value of any unfunded loan commitments. Assets and liabilities are categorized for disclosure purposes based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. The valuation hierarchical levels are based upon the transparency of the inputs to the valuation of the asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1: Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level 2: Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3: Inputs include significant unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the assets or liabilities. The inputs into the determination of fair value are based upon the best information available and may require significant management judgment or estimation.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the categorization of an asset or a liability within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The Company assesses the levels of investments at each measurement date, and transfers between levels are recognized on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfers. There were no transfers among level 1, 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy for investments during the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The following section describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure different assets and liabilities at fair value and includes the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the assets and liabilities are categorized.

Level 1 assets and liabilities are valued using quoted market prices. Level 2 assets and liabilities are valued using market consensus prices that are corroborated by observable market data and quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board, based on input of management, the audit committee and independent valuation firms that have been engaged at the direction of the Board to assist in the valuation of each portfolio investment without a readily available market quotation at least once during a trailing twelve-month period under a valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process. This valuation process is conducted at the end of each fiscal quarter, with approximately 25% (based on fair value) of the Company’s valuation of debt and equity securities without readily available market quotations subject to review by an independent valuation firm. All assets (other than cash and cash equivalents) and liabilities as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012 were valued using Level 3 inputs of the fair value hierarchy.

When valuing Level 3 debt and equity investments, the Company may take into account the following factors, where relevant, in determining the fair value of the investments: the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons to publicly traded securities, changes in the interest rate environment and the credit markets generally that

38


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 5. Fair Value Measurements  – (continued)

may affect the price at which similar investments may be made and other relevant factors. In addition, for certain debt and equity investments, the Company may base its valuation on indicative bid and ask prices provided by an independent third party pricing service. Bid prices reflect the highest price that the Company and others may be willing to pay. Ask prices represent the lowest price that the Company and others may be willing to accept for an investment. The Company generally uses the midpoint of the bid/ask range as its best estimate of fair value of such investment.

Fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated by discounting remaining payments using applicable market rates or market quotes for similar instruments at the measurement date, if available.

ASC Topic 820 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate such value. As a result, with the exception of the line item titled “debt” which is reported at cost, all assets and liabilities approximate fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition due to their short maturity.

Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the assets and liabilities may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such assets and liabilities and may differ materially from the values that may ultimately be received or settled. Further, such assets and liabilities are generally subject to legal and other restrictions or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded instruments. If the Company were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, the Company may realize significantly less than the value at which such investment had previously been recorded.

The Company’s investments and borrowings are subject to market risk. Market risk is the potential for changes in the value due to market changes. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the investments and borrowings are traded.

The following table presents fair value measurements of the Company’s investments and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value:

As of December 31, 2012: Fair Value Measurements Using
Description Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:
Debt investments (1) $ $ $ 743,503 $ 743,503
Equity investments (1) 24,839 24,839
$ $ $ 768,342 $ 768,342

As of September 30, 2012: Fair Value Measurements Using
Description Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:
Debt investments (1) $ $ $ 651,485 $ 651,485
Equity investments (1) 21,425 21,425
$ $ $ 672,910 $ 672,910

(1) Refer to the consolidated schedules of investments for further details.

The net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 reported within the net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and the net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivative instruments in the Company’s consolidated statements of operation attributable to the Company’s Level 3 assets held as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1,719 and $(5,821), respectively.

39


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 5. Fair Value Measurements  – (continued)

The following table presents the changes in investments measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs for the three months ended December 31, 2012:

Three months ended December 31, 2012
Debt Investments Equity Investments Total
Fair value, beginning of period $ 651,485 $ 21,425 $ 672,910
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments (401 ) 48 (353 )
Realized gain on investments 55 39 94
Fundings of revolving loans, net 2,828 2,828
Fundings of investments 231,738 3,589 235,327
PIK interest 705 705
Proceeds from principal payments and
sales of portfolio investments
(145,347 ) (262 ) (145,609 )
Amortization of discount and premium 2,440 2,440
Fair value, end of period $ 743,503 $ 24,839 $ 768,342

The following table presents the changes in investments and derivatives measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs for the three months ended December 31, 2011:

Three months ended December 31, 2011
Debt Investments Equity Investments Derivative instruments (1) Total
Fair value, beginning of period $ 450,437 $ 9,390 $ (1,845 ) $ 457,982
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and derivative instruments 517 (174 ) 1,455 1,798
Realized (loss) gain on investments and derivative instruments (2,115 ) 636 (1,479 )
Fundings of revolving loans, net 1,231 1,231
Fundings of investments 139,722 4,824 144,546
Proceeds from principal payments and sales of portfolio investments (42,876 ) (42,876 )
Proceeds from derivative instruments (1) (636 ) (636 )
Amortization of discount and premium 1,090 1,090
Fair value, end of period $ 548,006 $ 14,040 $ (390 ) $ 561,656

(1) Refer to Note 7 for additional disclosures.

40


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 5. Fair Value Measurements  – (continued)

The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs of the Company’s level 3 investments as of December 31, 2012:

Quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Fair value at December 31, 2012 Valuation Techniques Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
Senior secured loans (1) (2) $ 205,839 Market comparable
companies
EBITDA multiples 5.2x – 13.6x (8.9x)
Market rate
approach
Market interest rate 5.7% – 16.5% (7.7%)
One stop loans $ 363,560 Market comparable
companies
EBITDA multiples 4.5x – 14.7x (9.2x)
Market rate
approach
Market interest rate 7.0% – 22.5% (9.2%)
Subordinated and second lien loans (3) (4) $ 110,417 Market comparable
companies
EBITDA multiples 7.0x – 16.5x (9.3x)
Market rate
approach
Market interest rate 8.0% – 21.0% (12.5%)
Equity securities $ 24,839 Market comparable
companies
EBITDA multiples 5.5x – 14.7x (9.4x)

(1) Excludes $39,066 of loans at fair value, which the Company valued using indicative bid and ask prices provided by an independent third party pricing service.
(2) Excludes $3,985 of loans at fair value. These loans were valued using only EBITDA multiples or on a liquidation basis.
(3) Excludes $20,214 of loans at fair value, which the Company valued using indicative bid and ask prices provided by an independent third party pricing service.
(4) Excludes $422 of non-accrual loans at fair value. These loans were valued using only EBITDA multiples or on a liquidation basis.

41


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 5. Fair Value Measurements  – (continued)

The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs of the Company’s level 3 investments as of September 30, 2012:

Quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Fair value at September 30, 2012 Valuation Techniques Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
Senior secured loans (1) (2) $ 216,063 Market comparable
companies
EBITDA multiples 4.5x –  14.5x (8.5x)
Market rate
approach
Market interest rate 2.7% – 28.0% (7.9%)
One stop loans $ 265,705 Market comparable
companies
EBITDA multiples 4.7x – 14.5x (8.9x)
Market rate
approach
Market interest rate 5.2% – 23.0% (8.9%)
Subordinated and second lien loans (3) (4) $ 97,946 Market comparable
companies
EBITDA multiples 7.0x – 11.0x (8.4x)
Market rate
approach
Market interest rate 8.0% – 21.0% (12.8%)
Equity securities $ 21,425 Market comparable
companies
EBITDA multiples 4.5x – 14.5x (9.0x)

(1) Excludes $56,058 of loans at fair value, which the Company valued using indicative bid and ask prices provided by an independent third party pricing service.
(2) Excludes $1,868 of loans at fair value. These loans were valued on a liquidation basis.
(3) Excludes $12,151 of loans at fair value, which the Company valued using indicative bid and ask prices provided by an independent third party pricing service.
(4) Excludes $1,694 of non-accrual loans at fair value. These loans were valued on a liquidation basis.

The above tables are not intended to be all-inclusive, but rather to provide information on significant unobservable inputs and valuation techniques used by the Company.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s debt and equity securities are earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiples and market interest rates. The Company uses EBITDA multiples on its loans and equity securities to determine any credit gains or losses. Significant increases or decreases in either of these inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. The Company uses market interest rates for loans to determine if the effective yield on a loan is commensurate with the market yields for that type of loan. If a loan’s effective yield is significantly less than the market yield for a similar loan with a similar credit profile, then the resulting fair value of the loan may be lower.

The following are the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s debt liabilities as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012. Fair value is estimated by discounting remaining payments using applicable market rates or market quotes for similar instruments at the measurement date, if available.

As of December 31, 2012 As of September 30, 2012
Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
Debt $ 400,450 $ 405,918 $ 352,300 $ 358,046

42


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 6. Borrowings

In accordance with the 1940 Act, with certain limited exceptions, the Company is only allowed to borrow amounts such that its asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% after such borrowing. On September 13, 2011, the Company received exemptive relief from the SEC allowing it to modify the asset coverage requirement to exclude the SBA debentures from this calculation. As such, the Company’s ratio of total consolidated assets to outstanding indebtedness may be less than 200%. This provides the Company with increased investment flexibility but also increases its risks related to leverage. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s asset coverage for borrowed amounts was 257.4%.

Debt Securitization: On July 16, 2010, the Company completed a $300,000 term debt securitization (“Debt Securitization”). The notes (“Notes”) offered in the Debt Securitization were issued by Golub Capital BDC 2010-1 LLC (the “Issuer”), a subsidiary of Golub Capital BDC 2010-1 Holdings LLC (“Holdings”), a direct subsidiary of the Company, and the Class A Notes and Class B Notes are secured by the assets held by the Issuer. The Debt Securitization was executed through a private placement of $174,000 of Aaa/AAA Class A Notes of the Issuer which bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 2.40%. The $10,000 face amount of Class B Notes bears interest at a rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.40%, and the $116,000 face amount of Subordinated Notes does not bear interest. The Class A Notes are included in the December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012 consolidated statements of financial condition. In partial consideration for the loans transferred to the Issuer as part of the Debt Securitization, Holdings retained all of the Class B and Subordinated Notes totaling $10,000 and $116,000, respectively, and all of the membership interests in the Issuer, which Holdings initially purchased for two hundred and fifty dollars.

During a period of up to three years from the closing date (which may be extended for two additional years, upon satisfaction of certain conditions), all principal collections received on the underlying collateral may be used by the Issuer to purchase new collateral under the direction of the Investment Adviser in its capacity as collateral manager of the Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investment strategy, allowing the Company to maintain the initial leverage in the Debt Securitization for such three-year period. The Notes are scheduled to mature on July 20, 2021.

The proceeds of the private placement of the Notes, net of expenses, were used to repay and terminate the Company’s prior credit facility, which was a $300,000 credit facility entered into on July 27, 2007. As part of the Debt Securitization, the Company entered into a master loan sale agreement with Holdings and the Issuer under which the Company agreed to sell or contribute certain senior secured and second lien loans (or participation interests therein) to Holdings, and Holdings agreed to sell or contribute such loans (or participation interests therein) to the Issuer and to purchase or otherwise acquire subordinated notes issued by the Issuer. The Notes are the secured obligations of the Issuer, and an indenture governing the Notes includes customary covenants and events of default.

The Investment Adviser serves as collateral manager to the Issuer under a collateral management agreement and receives a fee for providing these services. As a result, the Company has amended and restated its Investment Advisory Agreement to provide that the base management fee payable under such agreement is reduced by an amount equal to the total fees that are paid to the Investment Adviser by the Issuer for rendering such collateral management services.

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, there were 84 and 81 portfolio companies with a total fair value of $297,673 and $290,097, respectively, securing the Notes. The pool of loans in the Debt Securitization must meet certain requirements, including asset mix and concentration, collateral coverage, term, agency rating, minimum coupon, minimum spread and sector diversity requirements.

The interest charged under the Debt Securitization is based on three-month LIBOR, which as of December 31, 2012 was 0.3%. For the three months ended December 31, 2012, the effective average interest rate, which includes amortization of debt issuance costs on the Debt Securitization, was 3.2%, interest expense was $1,223 and cash paid for interest was $1,298. For the three months ended December 31, 2011, the effective

43


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 6. Borrowings  – (continued)

average interest rate, which includes amortization of debt issuance costs on the Debt Securitization, was 3.2%, interest expense was $1,235 and cash paid for interest was $1,178.

The classes, amounts, ratings and interest rates (expressed as a spread to LIBOR) of the Class A Notes are as follows:

Description Class A Notes
Type Senior Secured Floating Rate
Amount Outstanding $174,000
Moody's Rating “Aaa”
S&P Rating “AAA”
Interest Rate LIBOR + 2.40%
Stated Maturity July 20, 2021

SBA Debentures: On August 24, 2010, GC SBIC IV, L.P. (“SBIC IV”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, received approval for a license from the SBA to operate as an SBIC. On December 5, 2012, GC SBIC V, L.P. (“SBIC V”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, received a license from the SBA to operate as an SBIC. SBICs are subject to a variety of regulations and oversight by the SBA concerning the size and nature of the companies in which they may invest as well as the structures of those investments.

The licenses allow the Company’s SBICs to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and customary procedures. These debentures are non-recourse to the Company, have interest payable semiannually and a ten-year maturity. The interest rate is fixed at the time of issuance at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with ten-year maturities.

Under present SBIC regulations, the maximum amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures that may be issued by multiple licensees under common management is $225,000 and the maximum amount that may be issued by a single SBIC licensee is $150,000. An affiliate of the Investment Adviser manages another SBIC. As of December 31, 2012, the affiliated SBIC licensee had $41,600 of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding, while SBIC IV and SBIC V had $135,000 of and no outstanding SBA-guaranteed debentures, respectively, leaving incremental borrowing capacity of $15,000 and $33,400 for SBIC IV and SBIC V, respectively, under present SBIC regulations. As of September 30, 2012, SBIC IV had $123,500 of outstanding SBA-guaranteed debentures. On August 24, 2010, the date SBIC IV received its license from the SBA, the SBA restricted the affiliated SBIC licensee from making new investments. The affiliated SBIC licensee is limited to only making add-on investments in existing portfolio companies.

SBIC IV may borrow up to two times the amount of its regulatory capital, subject to customary regulatory requirements. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had committed and funded $75,000 to SBIC IV and had SBA-guaranteed debentures of $135,000 outstanding which mature between March 2021 and September 2022. The interest rate on $123,500 of outstanding debentures was fixed at an average annualized interest rate of 3.4%. The annualized interim financing rate on the remaining $11,500 of outstanding debentures was 1.5%. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the effective average interest rate, which includes amortization of fees paid on the debentures, was 3.9% and 3.4%, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, interest expense was $1,092 and $627, respectively. There were no interest payments made on SBA debentures during the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

SBIC V may borrow up to two times the amount of its regulatory capital, subject to customary regulatory requirements including, but not limited to, an examination by the SBA. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had committed $37,500 and funded $10,000 to SBIC V and had no SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding.

44


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 6. Borrowings  – (continued)

Revolving Credit Facility: On July 21, 2011, Golub Capital BDC Funding LLC (“Funding”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as administrative agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as lender. In December 2012, the Credit Facility was amended to increase the size of the Credit Facility from $75,000 to $150,000.

The period from the closing date until October 21, 2013 is referred to as the reinvestment period. All amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility are required to be repaid by October 20, 2017. Through the reinvestment period, the Credit Facility bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum. After the reinvestment period, the rate will reset to LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum for the remaining term of the Credit Facility. In addition to the stated interest expense on the Credit Facility, the Company is required to pay a fee of 0.50% per annum on any unused portion of the Credit Facility up to $30,000 and 2.00% on any unused portion in excess of $30,000. On January 25, 2013, the Credit Facility was amended to, among other things, amend the fee on the unused portion of the Credit Facility to 0.50% for the period from December 13, 2012 through January 28, 2013. After January 28, 2013, the Credit Facility will pay a fee of 0.50% per annum on any unused portion of the Credit Facility up to $60,000 and 2.00% on any unused portion in excess of $60,000.

The Credit Facility is secured by all of the assets held by Funding, and the Company has pledged its interests in Funding as collateral to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as the collateral agent, under an ancillary agreement to secure the obligations of the Company as the transferor and servicer under the Credit Facility. Both the Company and Funding have made customary representations and warranties and are required to comply with various covenants, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. Borrowing under the Credit Facility is subject to the leverage restrictions contained in the 1940 Act.

The Company plans to transfer certain loans and debt securities it has originated or acquired from time to time to Funding through a purchase and sale agreement and may cause Funding to originate or acquire loans in the future, consistent with the Company’s investment objectives.

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, the Company had outstanding debt under the Credit Facility of $91,450 and $54,800, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had borrowings on the Credit Facility of $96,150 and $35,517 and repayments on the Credit Facility of $59,500 and zero, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2012, the effective average interest rate on outstanding borrowings, which includes amortization of debt financing costs, was 2.8%, interest expense was $229 and cash paid for interest was $249. For the three months ended December 31, 2011, the effective average interest rate on outstanding borrowings, which includes amortization of debt financing costs, was 3.0%, interest expense was $164 and cash paid for interest was $125.

The average total debt outstanding (including the debt under the Debt Securitization, SBA debentures and Credit Facility) for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $338,768 and $273,495, respectively.

For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the effective average interest rate on the Company’s total debt outstanding was 3.4% and 3.5%, respectively.

A summary of the Company’s maturity requirements for borrowings as of December 31, 2012 is as follows:

Payments Due by Period
Total Less Than
1 Year
1 – 3 Years 3 – 5 Years More Than
5 Years
Debt Securitization $ 174,000 $ $ $ $ 174,000
SBA debentures 135,000 135,000
Credit Facility 91,450 91,450
Total borrowings $ 400,450 $ $ $ 91,450 $ 309,000

45


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 7. Derivative Instruments

The Company had sold or terminated all of its derivative instruments as of December 31, 2012. The following table summarizes the fair value and location of the Company’s derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2011:

Location December 31, 2011
Fair Value
Futures Contracts Unrealized depreciation on
derivative instruments
$ (239 )
TRS Unrealized depreciation on
derivative instruments
(390 )
Total $ (629 )

Realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments recorded by the Company for the three months ended December 31, 2011 are in the following location on the consolidated statements of operations:

Location Realized Gain (Loss) Location Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Futures Contracts Net realized gain (loss)
on derivative instruments
$ (372 ) Net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation)
on derivative instruments
$ (98 )
TRS Net realized gain (loss)
on derivative instruments
636 Net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation)
on derivative instruments
1,455
$ 264 $ 1,357

Futures contracts: In September 2012, the Company sold its remaining ten-year U.S. Treasury futures contracts. The Company had entered into the futures contracts to mitigate its exposure to adverse fluctuation in interest rates related to the Company’s SBA debentures. The cash collateral underlying the futures contracts was returned to the Company.

Based on the daily fluctuation of the fair value of the futures contracts, the Company recorded an unrealized gain or loss equal to the daily fluctuation in fair value. Upon maturity or settlement of the futures contracts, the Company realized a gain or loss based on the difference of the fair value of the futures contracts at inception and the fair value of the futures contracts at settlement or maturity. This gain or loss is included on the consolidated statements of operations as net realized gain (loss) on derivative instruments.

For the three months ended December 31, 2011, the realized loss on settlement of futures contracts was $372 and the change in unrealized depreciation related to the futures contracts was $98. As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of the futures contracts was $(239). The total volume of futures contracts that the Company entered into was two hundred and fifty for the three months ended December 31, 2011.

Total return swap termination: On April 11, 2012, GCMF terminated the TRS that it had entered into with Citibank.

Upon termination, cash collateral of $19,912 that had secured the obligations to Citibank under the TRS was returned to the Company and was used to fund new middle-market debt and equity investments.

GCMF entered into the TRS to gain economic exposure to a portfolio of broadly syndicated loans. Generally, under the terms of a total return swap, one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in the market value of the assets referenced by the total return swap, which may include a specified security, basket of securities or securities indices during the specified period, in return for periodic

46


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 7. Derivative Instruments  – (continued)

payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate. A total return swap is typically used to obtain exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or investing directly in such market.

The Company received from Citibank all interest and fees payable in respect of the loans included in the portfolio. The Company paid to Citibank interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 1.2% per annum based on the settled notional value of the TRS. Upon termination of the TRS, the Company received from Citibank the net appreciation in the value of the referenced loans. On a quarterly basis, net payment between the Company and Citibank for interest and realized appreciation and depreciation on the portfolio of loans occurs.

The Company acted as the manager of the rights and obligations of GCMF under the TRS.

For GAAP purposes, realized gains and losses on the TRS are composed of any gains or losses on the referenced portfolio of loans as well as the net interest received or owed at the time of the quarterly settlement. For GAAP purposes, unrealized gains and losses on the TRS are composed of the net interest income earned or interest expense owed during the period that was not previously settled as well as the change in fair value of the referenced portfolio of loans.

For the three months ended December 31, 2011, the change in the fair value of the TRS was $1,455. Realized gains on the TRS for the three months ended December 31, 2011 were $636, which consisted of spread interest income of $647 and a realized loss of $11 on the sale of the referenced loans.

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments: The Company had outstanding commitments to fund investments totaling $59,921 and $56,547 under various undrawn revolvers and other credit facilities as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

Indemnifications: In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties that provide general indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as these involve future claims that may be made against the Company but that have not occurred. The Company expects the risk of any future obligations under these indemnifications to be remote.

Off-balance sheet risk: Off-balance sheet risk refers to an unrecorded potential liability that may result in a future obligation or loss, even though it does not appear on the statements of financial condition. The Company has entered and, in the future, may again enter into derivative instruments that contain elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. Derivative instruments can be affected by market conditions, such as interest rate volatility, which could impact the fair value of the derivative instruments. If market conditions move against the Company, it may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the derivative instruments and may realize a loss. The Company minimizes market risk through monitoring its investments.

Concentration of credit and counterparty risk: Credit risk arises primarily from the potential inability of counterparties to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract. The Company was engaged and, in the future, may engage again in derivative transactions with counterparties. In the event that the counterparties do not fulfill their obligations, the Company may be exposed to risk. The risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparties or issuers of the instruments. The Company’s maximum loss that it could incur related to counterparty risk on its derivative instruments is the value of the collateral for that respective derivative instrument. It is the Company’s policy to review, as necessary, the credit standing of each counterparty.

47


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies  – (continued)

Legal proceedings: In the normal course of business, the Company may be subject to legal and regulatory proceedings that are generally incidental to its ongoing operations. While there can be no assurance of the ultimate disposition of any such proceedings, the Company does not believe any disposition will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 9. Financial Highlights

The financial highlights for the Company are as follows:

Three months ended December 31,
2012 2011
Per share data (1) :
Net asset value at beginning of period $ 14.60 $ 14.56
Net increase in net assets as a result of public offering 0.05
Dividends and distributions declared (0.32 ) (0.32 )
Net investment income 0.34 0.29
Net realized (loss) gain on investments (0.09 )
Net realized gain on derivative instruments 0.01
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments (0.01 ) 0.02
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
derivative instruments
0.06
Net asset value at ending of period $ 14.66 $ 14.53
Per share market value at end of period $ 15.98 $ 15.50
Total return based on market value (2) 2.52 % 6.53 %
Total return based on average net asset value/members' equity* 8.97 % 1.93 %
Shares outstanding at end of period 28,605,336 21,758,955
Ratios/Supplemental Data:
Ratio of expenses (without incentive fees) to average net
assets/members' equity*
6.37 % 6.47 %
Ratio of incentive fees to average net assets/members' equity* (3) 2.30 % 1.13 %
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets/members' equity* (3) 8.67 % 7.60 %
Ratio of net investment income to average net
assets/members' equity*
9.22 % 7.86 %
Net assets at end of period $ 419,390 $ 316,160
Average debt outstanding $ 338,768 $ 273,495
Average debt outstanding per share $ 11.84 $ 12.57
Portfolio turnover* 83.45 % 33.77 %

* Annualized for a period less than one year
(1) Based on actual number of shares outstanding at the end of the corresponding period or the weighted average shares outstanding for the period, unless otherwise noted, as appropriate.
(2) Total return based on market value assumes dividends are reinvested.
(3) During the three months ended December 31, 2011, the Investment Adviser irrevocably waived $647 of incentive fees attributable to the TRS. Had the Investment Adviser not waived these fees, the annualized ratio of incentive fees to average net assets and the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 1.93% and 8.40%, respectively, for the three months ended December 31, 2011.

48


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

Note 10. Earnings Per Share

The following information sets forth the computation of the net increase in net assets per share resulting from operations for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Three months ended December 31,
2012 2011
Earnings available to stockholders $ 9,319 $ 6,191
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding 27,933,613 21,734,720
Basic and diluted earnings per share $ 0.33 $ 0.28

Note 11. Dividends and Distributions

The Company’s dividends and distributions are recorded on the record date. The following table summarizes the Company’s dividend declarations and distributions during the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Date Declared Record Date Payment Date Amount
Per Share
Cash Distribution DRIP Shares Issued DRIP Shares Value
Three months ended December 31, 2012
11/27/2012 12/14/2012 12/28/2012 $ 0.32 $ 8,804 23,115 $ 342
Three months ended December 31, 2011
12/7/2011 12/19/2011 12/29/2011 $ 0.32 $ 6,580 25,052 $ 375

Note 12. Subsequent Events

On January 4, 2013, SBIC V received a $37,500 debenture capital commitment from the SBA. The commitment may be drawn upon subject to customary regulatory requirements including, but not limited to, an examination by the SBA.

On January 15, 2013, the Company priced a public offering of 4,500,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $15.87 per share, raising approximately $71,415 in gross proceeds. On January 18, 2013, the transaction closed, the shares were issued, and proceeds, net of offering costs but before expenses, of $69,108 were received. The Company has also granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 675,000 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments, if any. Golub Capital Employee Grant Program Rabbi Trust, a trust organized for the purpose of awarding equity incentive compensation to employees of Golub Capital, purchased an aggregate of $1,000 of shares in the offering at the public offering price per share.

On January 25, 2013, Funding entered into an amendment (the “Credit Facility Amendment”) to the documents governing Funding’s Credit Facility with Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as administrative agent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as lender. The Credit Facility Amendment is effective as of December 13, 2012. The Credit Facility Amendment, among other things, amended the fee on the unused portion of the Credit Facility to 0.50% for the period from December 13, 2012 through January 28, 2013. After January 28, 2013, the Credit Facility will pay a fee of 0.50% per annum on any unused portion of the Credit Facility up to $60,000 and 2.00% on any unused portion in excess of $60,000.

On February 5, 2013, the Company’s Board declared a quarterly distribution of $0.32 per share payable on March 28, 2013 to holders of record as of March 14, 2013 and consented to the assignment by GC Service Company, LLC of the Administration Agreement to Golub Capital LLC, following which Golub Capital LLC serves as the Company’s Administrator.

49


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. In this report, “we,” “us,” “our” and “Golub Capital BDC” refer to Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

our future operating results;
our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies;
the effect of investments that we expect to make;
our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;
actual and potential conflicts of interest with our investment adviser, GC Advisors LLC, or GC Advisors, and other affiliates of Golub Capital Incorporated and Golub Capital LLC (formerly Golub Capital Management LLC), collectively, Golub Capital;
the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its effect on the industries in which we invest;
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;
the use of borrowed money to finance a portion of our investments;
the adequacy of our financing sources and working capital;
the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies;
the ability of GC Advisors to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments;
the ability of GC Advisors or its affiliates to attract and retain highly talented professionals;
our ability to qualify and maintain our qualification as a regulated investment company, or RIC, and as a business development company;
the impact on our business of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations issued thereunder; and
the effect of changes to tax legislation and our tax position.

Such forward-looking statements may include statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “may,” “might,” “will,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” “can,” “would,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “potential,” “plan” or similar words. The forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict. Our actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth as “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

We have based the forward-looking statements included in this report on information available to us on the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements and future results could differ materially from historical performance. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we

50


TABLE OF CONTENTS

have filed or in the future may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, registration statements on Form N-2, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

You should understand that, under Section 27A(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 do not apply to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. In addition, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. As a business development company and a regulated investment company, or RIC, we are also subject to certain constraints, including limitations imposed by the 1940 Act and the Code. We were formed in November 2009 to continue and expand the business of our predecessor, Golub Capital Master Funding LLC, or GCMF, which commenced operations in July 2007, in making investments in senior secured, one stop (a loan that combines characteristics of traditional first lien senior secured loans and second lien or subordinated loans), subordinated (a loan that ranks senior only to a borrower’s equity securities and ranks junior to all of such borrower’s other indebtedness in priority of payment), second lien loans and warrants and equity securities of middle-market companies that are, in most cases, sponsored by private equity firms.

Our shares are currently listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “GBDC”.

Our investment objective is to maximize the total return to our stockholders in the form of current income and capital appreciation through debt and minority equity investments. We intend to achieve our investment objective by (1) accessing the established loan origination channels developed by Golub Capital, a leading lender to middle-market companies with over $7.0 billion in capital under management, (2) selecting investments within our core middle-market company focus, (3) partnering with experienced private equity firms, or sponsors, in many cases with whom we have invested alongside in the past, (4) implementing the disciplined underwriting standards of Golub Capital and (5) drawing upon the aggregate experience and resources of Golub Capital.

Our investment activities are managed by GC Advisors and supervised by our board of directors of which a majority of the members are independent of us.

Under an investment advisory agreement, or the Investment Advisory Agreement, entered into on April 14, 2010, and amended and restated on July 16, 2010, we have agreed to pay GC Advisors an annual base management fee based on our average adjusted gross assets as well as an incentive fee based on our investment performance. Our board of directors most recently reapproved the Investment Advisory Agreement on February 5, 2013. We entered into an administration agreement, or the Administration Agreement, with GC Service Company, LLC, or including, as the context may require, Golub Capital LLC after the assignment of the Administration Agreement to Golub Capital LLC on February 5, 2013, the Administrator, under which we have agreed to reimburse the Administrator for our allocable portion (subject to the review and approval of our independent directors) of overhead and other expenses incurred by GC Service in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement.

We seek to create a diverse portfolio that includes senior secured, one stop, subordinated and second lien loans and warrants and minority equity securities by investing approximately $5 to $25 million of capital, on average, in the securities of middle-market companies. We may also selectively invest more than $25 million in some of our portfolio companies and generally expect that the size of our individual investments will vary proportionately with the size of our capital base.

As of December 31, 2012, our portfolio at fair value was comprised of 32.4% senior secured loans, 47.3% one stop loans, 10.6% second lien loans, 6.5% subordinated loans and 3.2% equity securities. As of September 30, 2012, our portfolio at fair value was comprised of 40.7% senior secured loans, 39.5% one stop loans, 6.6% second lien loans, 10.0% subordinated loans and 3.2% equity.

51


TABLE OF CONTENTS

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, we had debt and equity investments in 129 and 121 portfolio companies, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, our income producing assets had a weighted average interest income (which excludes income resulting from amortization of fees and discounts) yield of 9.7% and 9.3% and a weighted average investment income (which includes interest income and amortization of fees and discounts) yield of 11.2% and 10.2%, respectively.

Revenues: We generate revenue in the form of interest income on debt investments and capital gains and distributions, if any, on portfolio company investments that we originate or acquire. Our debt investments, whether in the form of senior secured, one stop, second lien or subordinated loans, typically have a term of three to seven years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. In some instances, we receive payments on our debt investments based on scheduled amortization of the outstanding balances. In addition, we receive repayments of some of our debt investments prior to their scheduled maturity date. The frequency or volume of these repayments fluctuates significantly from period to period. Our portfolio activity also reflects the proceeds of sales of securities. In some cases, our investments provide for deferred interest payments or payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest. The principal amount of loans and any accrued but unpaid interest generally become due at the maturity date. In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, amendment, structuring or due diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance and consulting fees. Loan origination fees, original issue discount and market discount or premium are capitalized, and we accrete or amortize such amounts as interest income. We record prepayment premiums on loans as interest income. When we receive partial principal payments on a loan in an amount that exceeds its amortized or accreted cost, we record the excess principal payment as interest income. Dividend income on preferred equity securities is recorded as dividend income on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are payable by the portfolio company and are expected to be collected. Dividend income on common equity securities is recorded on the record date for private portfolio companies or on the ex-dividend date for publicly traded portfolio companies.

We recognize realized gains or losses on investments based on the difference between the net proceeds from the disposition and the cost basis of the investment or derivative instrument, without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized. We record current period changes in fair value of investments and derivative instruments that are measured at fair value as a component of the net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the consolidated statements of operations.

Expenses: Our primary operating expenses include the payment of fees to GC Advisors under the Investment Advisory Agreement, our allocable portion of overhead expenses under the Administration Agreement and other operating costs described below. Additionally, we pay interest expense on our outstanding debt. We bear all other out-of-pocket costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including:

organizational expenses;
calculating our net asset value (including the cost and expenses of any independent valuation firm);
fees and expenses incurred by GC Advisors payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or other advisors, in monitoring financial and legal affairs for us and in monitoring our investments and performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio companies or otherwise relating to, or associated with, evaluating and making investments;
interest payable on debt, if any, incurred to finance our investments and expenses related to unsuccessful portfolio acquisition efforts;
offerings of our common stock and other securities;
investment advisory and management fees;
administration fees and expenses, if any, payable under the Administration Agreement (including payments under the Administration Agreement between based upon our allocable portion of the Administrator’s overhead in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent and the allocable portion of the cost of our chief compliance officer, chief financial officer and their respective staffs);

52


TABLE OF CONTENTS

fees payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or other advisors, relating to, or associated with evaluating and making, investments in portfolio companies, including costs associated with meeting financial sponsors;
transfer agent, dividend agent and custodial fees and expenses;
U.S. federal and state registration fees;
all costs of registration and listing our shares on any securities exchange;
U.S. federal, state and local taxes;
independent directors’ fees and expenses;
costs of preparing and filing reports or other documents required by the SEC or other regulators;
costs of any reports, proxy statements or other notices to stockholders, including printing costs;
costs associated with individual or group stockholders;
costs associated with compliance under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
our allocable portion of any fidelity bond, directors and officers/errors and omissions liability insurance, and any other insurance premiums;
direct costs and expenses of administration, including printing, mailing, long distance telephone, copying, secretarial and other staff, independent auditors and outside legal costs;
proxy voting expenses; and
all other expenses incurred by us or the Administrator in connection with administering our business.

During periods of asset growth, we expect our general and administrative expenses to be relatively stable or decline as a percentage of total assets and increase during periods of asset declines. Incentive fees, interest expenses and costs relating to future offerings of securities would be additive to the expenses described above.

GC Advisors, as collateral manager for Golub Capital BDC 2010-1 LLC, or the Securitization Issuer, under the collateral management agreement, is entitled to receive an annual fee in an amount equal to 0.35% of the principal balance of the portfolio loans held by the Securitization Issuer at the beginning of the collection period relating to each payment date, which is payable in arrears on each payment date. This fee, which is less than the management fee payable under the Investment Advisory Agreement, is paid directly by the Securitization Issuer to GC Advisors and offset against such management fee. Accordingly, the 1.375% management fee paid by us to GC Advisors under the Investment Advisory Agreement on all of our assets, including those indirectly held through the Securitization Issuer, is reduced, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, by an amount equal to such 0.35% fee paid to GC Advisors by the Securitization Issuer. The term “collection period” refers to a quarterly period running from the day after the end of the prior collection period to the fifth business day of the calendar month in which a payment date occurs. This fee may be waived by the collateral manager. The collateral management agreement does not include any incentive fee payable to GC Advisors. In addition, the Securitization Issuer paid Wells Fargo Securities, LLC a structuring and placement fee for its services in connection with the initial structuring of a $300 million term debt securitization, or the Debt Securitization. The Securitization Issuer also agreed to pay ongoing administrative expenses to the trustee, collateral manager, independent accountants, legal counsel, rating agencies and independent managers in connection with developing and maintaining reports and providing required services in connection with the administration of the Debt Securitization. The administrative expenses are paid by the Securitization Issuer on each payment date in two parts: (1) a component that is paid in a priority to other amounts distributed by the Securitization Issuer, subject to an administrative expense cap equal to the sum of 0.04% per annum on the adjusted principal balance of the portfolio loans and other assets held by the Securitization Issuer on the last day of the collection period relating to such payment date, plus $150,000 per annum, and (2) a component that is paid in a subordinated position relative to other amounts distributed by the Securitization Issuer, equal to any amounts that exceed the aforementioned administrative expense cap. We

53


TABLE OF CONTENTS

believe that these administrative expenses approximate the amount of ongoing fees and expenses that we would be required to pay in connection with a traditional secured credit facility. Our common stockholders indirectly bear all of these expenses.

Recent Developments

On February 5, 2013, our board of directors declared a quarterly distribution of $0.32 per share payable on March 28, 2013 to holders of record as of March 14, 2013 and consented to the assignment by GC Service Company, LLC of the Administration Agreement to Golub Capital LLC, following which Golub Capital LLC serves as our Administrator.

On January 4, 2013, GC SBIC V, L.P., or SBIC V, our small business investment company, or SBIC, subsidiary received a $37.5 million debenture capital commitment from the Small Business Administration, or SBA. The commitment may be drawn upon subject to customary regulatory requirements including, but not limited to, an examination by the SBA.

On January 15, 2013, we priced a public offering of 4,500,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $15.87 per share, raising approximately $71.4 million in gross proceeds. On January 18, 2013, the transaction closed, the shares were issued, and proceeds, net of offering costs but before expenses, of $69.1 million were received. We have also granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 675,000 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments, if any. Golub Capital Employee Grant Program Rabbi Trust, a trust organized for the purpose of awarding equity incentive compensation to employees of Golub Capital, purchased an aggregate of $1.0 million of shares in the offering at the public offering price per share.

On January 25, 2013, Golub Capital BDC Funding LLC, or Funding, our wholly owned subsidiary, entered into an amendment, or the Credit Facility Amendment, to the documents governing Funding’s revolving credit facility, or the Credit Facility, with Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as administrative agent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as lender. The Credit Facility Amendment is effective as of December 13, 2012. The Credit Facility Amendment, among other things, amended the fee on the unused portion of the Credit Facility to 0.50% for the period from December 13, 2012 through January 28, 2013. After January 28, 2013, the Credit Facility will pay a fee of 0.50% per annum on any unused portion of the Credit Facility up to $60.0 million and 2.00% on any unused portion in excess of $60.0 million.

Consolidated Results of Operations

Consolidated operating results for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

Three months ended December 31, Variances
2012 2011 2012 vs. 2011
(In thousands)
Interest income $ 15,887 $ 11,010 $ 4,877
Income from accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums 2,440 1,090 1,350
Dividend income 267 377 (110 )
Total investment income 18,594 12,477 6,117
Total expenses 9,016 6,135 2,881
Net investment income 9,578 6,342 3,236
Net realized (losses) gains on investments and derivative instruments 94 (1,851 ) 1,945
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and derivative instruments (353 ) 1,700 (2,053 )
Net income $ 9,319 $ 6,191 $ 3,128
Average earning portfolio company
investments, at fair value
$ 663,077 $ 497,404 $ 165,673
Average debt outstanding $ 338,768 $ 273,495 $ 65,273

54


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 may not be indicative of the results we report in future periods. Net income can vary substantially from period to period for various reasons, including the recognition of realized gains and losses and unrealized appreciation and depreciation. As a result, quarterly comparisons of net income may not be meaningful.

Investment Income

Interest income increased by $4.9 million from the three months ended December 31, 2011 to the three months ended December 31, 2012 and was primarily driven by an increase of $165.7 million in the weighted average investment balance. To a lesser extent, the increase in interest income was driven by a higher weighted average annualized interest income yield (which excludes income resulting from amortization of fees and discounts), which increased from 9.3% for the three months ended December 31, 2011 to 9.7% for the three months ended December 31, 2012. The increase in the yield was driven primarily by an increase in prepayment penalties and other fees. Total prepayment penalties and other fees for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $0.9 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

Income from the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums increased by $1.4 million from the three months ended December 31, 2011 to the three months ended December 31, 2012. Income from the accretion of discounts and the amortization of premiums will fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter depending on the volume of payoffs and the discounts and premiums on the loans at the time of payoffs. Payoffs increased by $91.7 million from the three months ended December 31, 2011 to the three months ended December 31, 2012, which caused the increase in income from the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.

Annualized interest income yield (which excludes income resulting from amortization of fees and discounts) by security type for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

Three months ended December 31,
2012 2011
Senior secured 7.3 % 7.5 %
One stop 9.1 % 8.7 %
Second lien (1) 11.2 % 11.2 %
Subordinated debt 14.0 % 13.9 %

(1) Second lien loans include loans structured as first lien last out term loans.

Interest rate yields remained relatively consistent as pricing on new originations remained relatively consistent during the past year. However, based on current deal flow, we are seeing some spread compression on new transactions. For additional details on investment yields and asset mix, refer to the “ Liquidity and Capital Resources Portfolio Composition, Investment Activity and Yield ” section below.

Expenses

The following table summarizes our expenses:

Three months ended December 31, Variances
2012 2011 2012 vs. 2011
(In thousands)
Interest and other debt financing expenses $ 2,995 $ 2,366 $ 629
Base management fee 2,468 1,874 594
Incentive fee 2,394 909 1,485
Professional fees 493 588 (95 )
Administrative service fee 548 262 286
General and administrative expenses 118 136 (18 )
Total expenses $ 9,016 $ 6,135 $ 2,881

55


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Interest and debt financing expenses increased from the three months ended December 31, 2011 to the three months ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to an increase in the weighted average of outstanding borrowings from $273.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2011 to $338.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012. In addition to the $174.0 million of borrowings under the Debt Securitization that were outstanding for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we increased our use of debt through GC SBIC IV, L.P., or SBIC IV, our small business investment company, or SBIC, subsidiary and the Credit Facility, which had outstanding balances of $135.0 million and $91.5 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2012 and $100.0 million and $37.9 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2011.

The base management fee increased as a result of a sequential increase in average assets and average investments from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012. The administrative service expense increased during this same period due to an increase in costs associated with servicing a growing investment portfolio. In addition, as permitted under the Administration Agreement, beginning January 1, 2012, an allocable portion of the cost of our chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs were charged to us, which was also partially related to the increase in the administrative service fee from the three months ended December 31, 2011 to the three months ended December 31, 2012. These costs are permitted to be charged under the terms of the Administration Agreement but were previously being waived by the Administrator.

The incentive fee increased by $1.5 million from the three months ended December 31, 2011 to the three months ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the increase in pre-incentive fee net investment income. In addition, as further described below, the incentive fee for the three months ended December 31, 2011 was reduced by $0.6 million as GC Advisors irrevocably waived the incremental portion of the incentive fee attributable from the total return swap, or TRS, interest spread payments.

As described in the “Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses” section below, we entered into the TRS with Citibank for the purpose of gaining economic exposure to a portfolio of broadly syndicated loans. We subsequently terminated the TRS on April 11, 2012. For the periods ending September 30, 2011 and prior, we had included interest spread payments, which represent the difference between the interest and fees received on the referenced assets underlying the TRS and the interest paid to Citibank on the settled notional value of the TRS, from the TRS in the capital gains component of the incentive fee calculation as this is consistent with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or GAAP, which records such payments in net realized gains/(losses) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statement of operations. However, we changed our methodology during the three months ended December 31, 2011 pursuant to discussions with the staff, or the Staff, of the SEC, resulting in the TRS interest spread payments being included in the income component of the incentive fee calculation.

For the three months ended December 31, 2011, we received $0.6 million of interest spread payments from the TRS. Including the interest spread payments from the TRS in the income component of the incentive fee calculation caused an increase in the incentive fee by $0.6 million. Upon reviewing the incentive fee calculation and the treatment of the interest spread payments from the TRS, GC Advisors irrevocably waived the incremental portion of the incentive fee attributable from the TRS interest spread payments for the three months ended December 31, 2011. Taking into account the waiver by GC Advisors, the Income Incentive Fee was $0.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2011, rather than $1.6 million.

Golub Capital Incorporated pays for certain expenses incurred by us. These expenses are subsequently reimbursed in cash. Total expenses reimbursed by us to Golub Capital Incorporated for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were zero and $0.1 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses were $0.3 million and $40,000, respectively, for accrued expenses paid on behalf of us by Golub Capital Incorporated.

56


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses

The following table summarizes our net realized and unrealized gains (losses) for the periods presented:

Three months ended December 31, Variances
2012 2011 2012 vs. 2011
(In thousands)
Net realized gain (loss) on investments $ 94 $ (2,115 ) $ 2,209
Net realized gain on TRS 636 (636 )
Net realized loss on financial futures contracts (372 ) 372
Net realized gain (loss) 94 (1,851 ) 1,945
Unrealized (depreciation) on investments (5,768 ) (4,142 ) (1,626 )
Unrealized appreciation on investments 5,415 4,485 930
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on TRS 1,455 (1,455 )
Unrealized depreciation on financial futures contracts (98 ) 98
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments and derivative instruments $ (353 ) $ 1,700 $ (2,053 )

For the three months ended December 31, 2012, we had total asset sales of $14.0 million for a gain of $0.1 million. During the three months ended December 31, 2012, we had $5.8 million in unrealized depreciation on 94 portfolio company investments, which was partially offset by $5.4 million in unrealized appreciation on 47 portfolio company investments. Unrealized depreciation during the three months ended December 31, 2012 primarily resulted from the accretion of discounts and negative credit related adjustments which caused a reduction in fair value. Unrealized appreciation during the three months ended December 31, 2012 resulted from an increase in fair value primarily due to the rise in market prices and a reversal of prior period unrealized depreciation.

For the three months ended December 31, 2011, we had realized losses of $2.1 million primarily as a result of the sale of a non-accrual portfolio company. We had $4.5 million in unrealized appreciation on 30 portfolio company investments, which was partially offset by $4.1 million in unrealized depreciation on 81 portfolio company investments. Unrealized appreciation during the three months ended December 31, 2011 resulted from an increase in fair value primarily due to the rise in market prices and a reversal of prior period unrealized depreciation. Unrealized depreciation primarily resulted from the accretion of discounts and negative credit related adjustments which caused a reduction in fair value.

Termination of the Total Return Swap

On April 11, 2012, we terminated the TRS that we had entered into with Citibank. Cash collateral of $19.9 million that had secured the obligations to Citibank under the TRS was returned to us and was used to fund new middle-market debt and equity investments.

The purpose of entering into the TRS was to gain economic exposure to a portfolio of broadly syndicated loans. Generally, under the terms of a total return swap, one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in the market value of the assets referenced by the total return swap, which may include a specified security, basket of securities or securities indices during the specified period, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate.

For the three months ended December 31, 2011, the change in the fair value of the TRS was $1.5 million. Realized gains on the TRS for the three months ended December 31, 2011 were $0.6 million, primarily comprised of spread interest income.

Ten-Year U.S. Treasury Futures Contracts

In September of 2012, we sold our remaining ten-year U.S. Treasury futures contracts. We had entered into the futures contracts to mitigate our exposure to adverse fluctuation in interest rates related to our or SBA debentures. The cash collateral underlying the futures contracts was returned to us.

57


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Based on the daily fluctuation of the fair value of the futures contracts, we recorded an unrealized gain or loss equal to the daily fluctuation in fair value. Upon maturity or settlement of the futures contracts, we realized a gain or loss based on the difference of the fair value of the futures contracts at inception and the fair value of the futures contracts at settlement or maturity.

For the three months ended December 31, 2011, the realized loss on settlement of futures contracts was $0.4 million and the change in unrealized depreciation related to the futures contracts was $0.1 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As a business development company, we distribute substantially all of our net income to our stockholders and will have an ongoing need to raise additional capital for investment purposes. To fund growth, we have a number of alternatives available to increase capital, including raising equity, increasing debt, including through one or more additional securitization facilities or an amendment to the Debt Securitization, and funding from operational cash flow.

For the three months ended December 31, 2012, we experienced a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $7.5 million. During the same period, we used $72.5 million in operating activities, primarily as a result of fundings of portfolio investments of $235.3 million. This was partially offset by proceeds from principal payments and sales of portfolio investments of $145.6 million and net investment income of $9.6 million. During the same period, cash used in investment activities of $2.2 million was driven by the change in restricted cash and cash equivalents. Lastly, cash provided by financing activities was $82.2 million, primarily due to borrowings on debt of $107.7 million and proceeds from shares sold from our public offering of $43.8 million (described below), partially offset by repayments of debt of $59.5 million and distributions paid of $8.8 million.

For the three months ended December 31, 2011, we experienced a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $20.9 million. During the period we used $96.6 million in operating activities, primarily as a result of fundings of portfolio investments of $144.5 million. This was partially offset by proceeds from principal payments and sales of portfolio investments of $42.9 million and net investment income of $6.3 million. During the same period, cash provided by investment activities of $9.0 million was driven by the change in restricted cash and cash equivalents. Lastly, cash provided by financing activities was $66.7 million, primarily due to borrowings on debt of $74.2 million, partially offset by distributions paid of $6.6 million.

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $21.4 million and $13.9 million, respectively. In addition, we had restricted cash and cash equivalents of $39.2 million and $37.0 million as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents are available to fund new investments, pay operating expenses and pay distributions. As of December 31, 2012, $11.0 million of our restricted cash and cash equivalents could be used to fund new investments that meet the investment guidelines established in the Debt Securitization, which are described in further detail in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements, and for the payment of interest expense on the notes issued in the Debt Securitization. $6.5 million of such restricted cash and cash equivalents was used to fund investments that meet the guidelines under the Credit Facility as well as for the payment of interest expense and revolving debt of the Credit Facility. The remaining $21.7 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents can be used to fund new investments that meet the regulatory and investment guidelines established by the SBA for our SBICs, which are described in further detail in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements, and for interest expense and fees on our outstanding SBA debentures.

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, we had outstanding commitments to fund investments totaling $59.9 million and $56.5 million, respectively. These amounts may or may not be funded to the borrowing party now or in the future. The unfunded commitments relate to loans with various maturity dates, but the entire amount was eligible for funding to the borrowers as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively, subject to the terms of each loan’s respective credit agreement.

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, subject to leverage and borrowing base restrictions, we had approximately $58.5 million and $20.2 million, respectively, available for additional borrowings on the Credit Facility.

58


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under present SBIC regulations, the maximum amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures that may be issued by multiple licensees under common management is $225.0 million and the maximum amount that may be issued by a single SBIC licensee is $150.0 million. An affiliate of the Investment Adviser manages another SBIC. As of December 31, 2012, the affiliated SBIC licensee had $41.6 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding, while SBIC IV and SBIC V had $135.0 million and zero of outstanding SBA-guaranteed debentures, respectively, leaving incremental borrowing capacity of $15.0 million and $33.4 million for SBIC IV and SBIC V, respectively, under present SBIC regulations. As of September 30, 2012, SBIC IV had $123.0 million of outstanding SBA-guaranteed debentures. On August 24, 2010, the date SBIC IV received its license from the SBA, the SBA restricted the affiliated SBIC licensee from making new investments. The affiliated SBIC licensee is limited to only making add-on investments in existing portfolio companies.

SBIC IV may borrow up to two times the amount of its regulatory capital, subject to customary regulatory requirements. As of December 31, 2012, we had committed and funded $75.0 million to SBIC IV and had SBA-guaranteed debentures of $135.0 million outstanding which mature between March 2021 and September 2022. SBIC V may borrow up to two times the amount of its regulatory capital, subject to customary regulatory requirements including, but not limited to, an examination by the SBA. As of December 31, 2012, we had committed $37.5 million and funded $10.0 million to SBIC V, and SBIC V had no SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding.

In accordance with the 1940 Act, with certain limited exceptions, we are only allowed to borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% after such borrowing. On September 13, 2011, we received exemptive relief from the SEC allowing us to modify the asset coverage requirement to exclude the SBA debentures from this calculation. As such, our ratio of total consolidated assets to outstanding indebtedness may be less than 200%. This provides us with increased investment flexibility but also increases our risks related to leverage. As of December 31, 2012, our asset coverage for borrowed amounts was 257.4% (excluding the SBA debentures).

On October 16, 2012, we priced a public offering of 2,600,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $15.58 per share, raising approximately $40.5 million in gross proceeds. On October 19, 2012, the transaction closed, the shares were issued, and proceeds, net of offering costs but before expenses, of $39.4 million were received. On November 14, 2012, we sold an additional 294,120 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $15.58 per share pursuant to the underwriters’ partial exercise of the over- allotment option.

On January 15, 2013, we priced a public offering of 4,500,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $15.87 per share, raising approximately $71.4 million in gross proceeds. On January 18, 2013, the transaction closed, the shares were issued, and proceeds, net of offering costs but before expenses, of $69.1 million were received. We have also granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 675,000 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments, if any.

Although we expect to fund the growth of our investment portfolio through the net proceeds from future securities offerings and through our dividend reinvestment plan as well as future borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, we cannot assure you that our efforts to raise capital will be successful. In addition to capital not being available, it also may not be available on favorable terms.

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and available borrowings as of December 31, 2012, as well as subsequent events that have occurred after December 31, 2012, will be sufficient to fund our anticipated requirements through at least December 31, 2013.

59


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Portfolio Composition, Investment Activity and Yield

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, we had investments in 129 and 121 portfolio companies, respectively, with a total value of $768.3 million and $672.9 million, respectively. The following table shows the asset mix of our new originations for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Three months ended December 31,
2012 2011
(In thousands) Percentage of Commitments (In thousands) Percentage of Commitments
Senior secured $ 58,251 22.2 % $ 49,317 30.0 %
One stop 161,000 61.4 62,145 37.9
Second lien 39,410 15.0 20,731 12.6
Subordinated debt 27,075 16.5
Equity securities 3,586 1.4 4,866 3.0
Total new investment commitments $ 262,247 100.0 % $ 164,134 100.0 %

For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had approximately $131.6 million and $40.1 million in proceeds from principal payments of portfolio companies, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had sales of securities in six and two portfolio companies aggregating approximately $14.0 and $2.8 million, respectively.

The following table shows the par, amortized cost and fair value of our portfolio of investments excluding derivative instruments by asset class:

As of December 31, 2012 (1) As of September 30, 2012 (1)
Par Amortized Cost Fair
Value
Par Amortized Cost Fair
Value
(In thousands)
Senior secured:
Performing $ 250,066 $ 246,108 $ 246,819 $ 274,846 $ 270,209 $ 272,461
Non-accrual (2) 5,182 4,766 2,071 5,733 5,527 1,528
One stop:
Performing 366,734 360,274 363,560 267,393 262,876 265,705
Non-accrual (2)
Second lien (3) :
Performing 81,514 79,568 81,313 44,267 42,775 44,108
Non-accrual (2) 403 382 133 589 573 259
Subordinated debt:
Performing 48,755 48,098 49,318 65,989 65,005 65,989
Non-accrual (2) 3,091 3,001 289 2,870 2,810 1,435
Equity N/A 23,429 24,839 N/A 20,066 21,425
Total $ 755,745 $ 765,626 $ 768,342 $ 661,687 $ 669,841 $ 672,910

(1) 11 and 14 of our loans included a feature permitting a portion of the interest due on such loan to be PIK interest as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively.
(2) We refer to a loan as non-accrual when we cease recognizing interest income on the loan because we have stopped pursuing repayment of the loan or, in certain circumstances, it is past due 90 days or more on principal and interest or our management has reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. See “— Critical Accounting Policies — Revenue Recognition.”
(3) Second lien loans included $14.7 million and $14.0 million of loans structured as first lien last out term loans as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

60


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table shows the weighted average rate, spread over LIBOR of floating rate, fixed rate and fees of investments originated and the weighted average rate of sales and payoffs of portfolio companies during the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Three months ended December 31,
2012 2011
Weighted average rate of new investment fundings 8.3 % 9.7 %
Weighted average spread over LIBOR of new floating rate investment fundings 6.9 7.3
Weighted average rate of new fixed rate investment fundings 14.2
Weighted average fees of new investment fundings 1.8 2.5
Weighted average rate of sales and payoffs of portfolio companies 8.2 7.5

For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the weighted average annualized interest income (which excludes income resulting from amortization of fees and discounts) yield on the fair value of income producing loans in our portfolio was 9.7% and 9.3%, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, 90.3% and 89.7% of our portfolio at fair value and at cost, respectively, had interest rate floors that limit the minimum applicable interest rates on such loans. As of September 30, 2012, 84.4% and 83.7% of our portfolio at fair value and at cost, respectively, had interest rate floors that limited minimum interest rates on such loans.

GC Advisors regularly assesses the risk profile of each of our investments and rates each of them based on an internal system developed by Golub Capital and its affiliates. This system is not generally accepted in our industry or used by our competitors. It is based on the following categories, which we refer to as GC Advisors’ investment performance rating:

Risk Ratings Definition

Rating Definition
5 Involves the least amount of risk in our portfolio. The borrower is performing above expectations and the trends and risk factors are generally favorable.
4 Involves an acceptable level of risk that is similar to the risk at the time of origination. The borrower is generally performing as expected and the risk factors are neutral to favorable.
3 Involves a borrower performing below expectations and indicates that the loan’s risk has increased somewhat since origination. The borrower may be out of compliance with debt covenants; however, loan payments are generally not past due.
2 Involves a borrower performing materially below expectations and indicates that the loan’s risk has increased materially since origination. In addition to the borrower being generally out of compliance with debt covenants, loan payments may be past due (but generally not more than 180 days past due).
1 Involves a borrower performing substantially below expectations and indicates that the loan’s risk has substantially increased since origination. Most or all of the debt covenants are out of compliance and payments are substantially delinquent. Loans rated 1 are not anticipated to be repaid in full and we will reduce the fair market value of the loan to the amount we anticipate will be recovered.

61


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table shows the distribution of our investments on the 1 to 5 investment performance rating scale at fair value as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012.

December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012
Investment Performance Rating Investments at Fair Value
(In thousands)
Percentage of Total Investments Investments at Fair Value
(In thousands)
Percentage of Total Investments
5 $ 107,548 14.0 % $ 145,414 21.6 %
4 612,624 79.7 468,182 69.6
3 43,924 5.7 55,149 8.2
2 2,047 0.3 340 0.1
1 2,199 0.3 3,825 0.5
Total $ 768,342 100.0 % $ 672,910 100.0 %

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

A summary of our significant contractual payment obligations as of December 31, 2012 is as follows:

Payments Due by Period (In millions)
Total Less Than
1 Year
1 – 3 Years 3 – 5 Years (1) More Than
5 Years (1)
Debt Securitization $ 174.0 $ $ $ $ 174.0
SBA debentures 135.0 135.0
Credit Facility 91.5 91.5
Unfunded commitments (2) 59.9 59.9
Total contractual obligations $ 460.4 $ 59.9 $ $ 91.5 $ 309.0

(1) The notes offered in the Debt Securitization are scheduled to mature on July 20, 2021. The SBA debentures are scheduled to mature between March 2021 and September 2022. The Credit Facility is scheduled to mature on October 20, 2017.
(2) Unfunded commitments represent all amounts unfunded as of December 31, 2012. These amounts may or may not be funded to the borrowing party now or in the future. The unfunded commitments relate to loans with various maturity dates, but we are showing this amount in the less than one year category, as this entire amount was eligible for funding to the borrowers as of December 31, 2012.

We may become a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of our business to meet the financial needs of our portfolio companies. These instruments may include commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of liquidity and credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, we had outstanding commitments to fund investments totaling $59.9 million and $56.5 million, respectively.

We have certain contracts under which we have material future commitments. We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with GC Advisors in accordance with the 1940 Act. The Investment Advisory Agreement became effective upon the pricing of our initial public offering and was amended and restated on July 16, 2010 in order to offset fees payable in connection with the Debt Securitization against the base management fee. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, GC Advisors provides us with investment advisory and management services. For these services, we pay (1) a management fee equal to a percentage of the average adjusted value of our gross assets and (2) an incentive fee based on our performance. To the extent that GC Advisors or any of its affiliates provides investment advisory, collateral management or other similar services to a subsidiary of ours, we intend to reduce the base management fee by an amount equal to the product of (1) the total fees paid to GC Advisors by such subsidiary for such services and (2) the percentage of such subsidiary’s total equity that is owned, directly or indirectly, by us.

We also entered into the Administration Agreement with GC Service Company, LLC as our administrator on April 14, 2010. Effective February 5, 2013, we consented to the assignment by GC Service Company, LLC of the Administration Agreement to Golub Capital LLC, following which Golub Capital LLC serves as our Administrator. Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator furnishes us with office facilities and

62


TABLE OF CONTENTS

equipment, provides us clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such facilities and provides us with other administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations. We reimburse the Administrator for the allocable portion (subject to the review and approval of our board of directors) of overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent, the fees and expenses associated with performing compliance functions and our allocable portion of the cost of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs. The Administrator also provides on our behalf significant managerial assistance to those portfolio companies to which we are required to offer to provide such assistance.

If any of the contractual obligations discussed above are terminated, our costs under any new agreements that we enter into may increase. In addition, we would likely incur significant time and expense in locating alternative parties to provide the services we receive under our Investment Advisory Agreement and our Administration Agreement. Any new investment advisory agreement would also be subject to approval by our stockholders.

Distributions

In order to qualify as a RIC and to avoid corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on the income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required under the Code to distribute at least 90% of our net ordinary income and net short-term capital gains in excess of net long-term capital losses, if any, to our net stockholders on an annual basis. Additionally, we must meet the annual distribution requirements of the U.S. federal excise tax rules. We intend to make quarterly distributions to our stockholders as determined by our board of directors.

We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of our distributions from time to time. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the asset coverage requirements applicable to us as a business development company under the 1940 Act. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences, including the possible loss of our qualification as a RIC. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions.

To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a return of capital to our stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, the source of a distribution to our stockholders may be the original capital invested by the stockholder rather than our income or gains. Stockholders should read any written disclosure accompanying a dividend payment carefully and should not assume that the source of any distribution is our ordinary income or gains.

We have adopted an “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a distribution, then our stockholders’ cash distributions will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock unless a stockholder specifically “opts out” of our dividend reinvestment plan. If a stockholder opts out, that stockholder will receive cash distributions. Although distributions paid in the form of additional shares of our common stock will generally be subject to U.S. federal, state and local taxes in the same manner as cash distributions, stockholders participating in our dividend reinvestment plan will not receive any corresponding cash distributions with which to pay any such applicable taxes.

Related Party Transactions

We have entered into a number of business relationships with affiliated or related parties, including the following:

We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with GC Advisors. Mr. Lawrence Golub, our chairman, is a manager of GC Advisors, and Mr. David Golub, our chief executive officer, is a manager of GC Advisors, and each of Messrs. Lawrence Golub and David Golub owns an indirect pecuniary interest in GC Advisors.
The Administrator provides us with the office facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct day-to-day operations pursuant to our Administration Agreement.
We have entered into a license agreement with Golub Capital LLC, pursuant to which Golub Capital LLC has granted us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “Golub Capital.”

63


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under a staffing agreement, or Staffing Agreement, between Golub Capital and GC Advisors, Golub Capital has agreed to provide GC Advisors with the resources necessary to fulfill its obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement. The Staffing Agreement provides that Golub Capital will make available to GC Advisors experienced investment professionals and access to the senior investment personnel of Golub Capital for purposes of evaluating, negotiating, structuring, closing and monitoring our investments. The Staffing Agreement also includes a commitment that the members of GC Advisors’ investment committee will serve in such capacity. Services under the Staffing Agreement are provided on a direct cost reimbursement basis.
In our common stock offerings that closed on February 3, 2012, October 19, 2012 and January 18, 2013, Golub Capital Employee Grant Program Rabbi Trust, a trust organized for the purpose of awarding equity incentive compensation to employees of Golub Capital, purchased an aggregate of $3.1 million of shares, $3.0 million of shares and $1.0 million of shares, respectively, at each respective public offering price per share. In addition, in the offering that closed on February 3, 2012, Mr. William M. Webster IV, one of our directors, purchased 15,000 shares at the public offering price per share, and Mr. John T. Baily, one of our directors, purchased $75,000 of shares at the public offering price per share. In our common stock offering that closed on October 19, 2012, Mr. William M. Webster IV purchased 10,000 shares at the public offering price per share.
GC Advisors irrevocably waived $0.6 million of the incentive fee payable by us to GC Advisors for the three months ended December 31, 2011, representing the difference between (1) the incentive fee attributable to the TRS if the spread between the interest received on the reference assets underlying the TRS and the interest paid to Citibank on the settled notional value of the TRS were to be treated as part of the income component of the incentive fee and (2) the incentive fee attributable to the TRS if such interest spread were to be treated as part of the capital gains component of such incentive fee.

GC Advisors also sponsors or manages, and may in the future sponsor or manage, other investment funds, accounts or investment vehicles, collectively referred to as accounts, that have investment mandates that are similar, in whole or in part, with ours. GC Advisors and its affiliates may determine that an investment is appropriate for us and for one or more of those other accounts. In such event, depending on the availability of such investment and other appropriate factors, and pursuant to GC Advisors’ allocation policy, GC Advisors or its affiliates may determine that we should invest side-by-side with one or more other accounts. We do not intend to make any investments if they are not permitted by applicable law and interpretive positions of the SEC and its Staff, or if they are inconsistent with GC Advisors’ allocation procedures.

In addition, we have adopted a formal code of ethics that governs the conduct of our and GC Advisors’ officers, directors and employees. Our officers and directors also remain subject to the duties imposed by both the 1940 Act and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified the following items as critical accounting policies.

Valuation of Investments

We value investments for which market quotations are readily available at their market quotations. However, a readily available market value is not expected to exist for many of the investments in our portfolio, and we value these portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors under our valuation policy and process. We may seek pricing information with respect to certain of our investments from pricing services or brokers or dealers in order to value such investments. We also employ independent third party valuation firms for all of our investments for which there is not a readily available market value.

Valuation methods may include comparisons of the portfolio companies to peer companies that are public, the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio

64


TABLE OF CONTENTS

company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, discounted cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business and other relevant factors. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, we will consider the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate the private equity valuation. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a readily available market value existed for such investments and may differ materially from values that may ultimately be received or settled.

Our board of directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining, in good faith, the fair value of investments that are not publicly traded, whose market prices are not readily available on a quarterly basis or any other situation where portfolio investments require a fair value determination.

With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available, our board of directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

Our quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the investment professionals of GC Advisors responsible for credit monitoring.
Preliminary valuation conclusions are then documented and discussed with our senior management and GC Advisors.
The audit committee of our board of directors reviews these preliminary valuations.
At least once annually, the valuation for each portfolio investment is reviewed by an independent valuation firm.
Our board of directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith.

The factors that are taken into account in fair value pricing investments include: available current market data, including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables; applicable market yields and multiples; security covenants; call protection provisions; information rights; the nature and realizable value of any collateral; the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows and the markets in which it does business; comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public; comparable merger and acquisition transactions; and the principal market and enterprise values.

Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and estimates not verifiable by auditing procedures. Under current auditing standards, the notes to our consolidated financial statements refer to the uncertainty with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any change in such valuations, on our consolidated financial statements.

We follow Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , as amended, for measuring fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received in the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters, or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation models involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the assets or liabilities or market and the assets’ or liabilities’ complexity. Our fair value analysis includes an analysis of the value of any unfunded loan commitments. Assets and liabilities are categorized for disclosure purposes based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. The valuation hierarchical levels are based upon the transparency of the inputs to the valuation of the asset or labiality as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1: Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level 2: Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

65


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Level 3: Inputs include significant unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the assets or liabilities. The inputs into the determination of fair value are based upon the best information available and may require significant management judgment or estimation.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an asset’s or a liability’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and we consider factors specific to the asset or liability. We assess the levels of investments at each measurement date, and transfers between levels are recognized on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfers. There were no transfers among Level 1, 2 and 3 investments during the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The following section describes the valuation techniques used by us to measure different assets and liabilities at fair value and includes the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the assets and liabilities are categorized.

Level 1 assets and liabilities are valued using quoted market prices. Level 2 assets and liabilities are valued using market consensus prices that are corroborated by observable market data and quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors, based on input of management, the audit committee and independent valuation firms that have been engaged at the direction of our board of directors to assist in the valuation of each portfolio investment without a readily available market quotation at least once during a trailing twelve-month period under a valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process. This valuation process is conducted at the end of each fiscal quarter, with approximately 25% (based on fair value) of our valuation of debt and equity securities without readily available market quotations subject to review by an independent valuation firm.

When valuing Level 3 debt and equity investments, we may take into account the following factors, where relevant, in determining the fair value of the investments: the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the nature and realizable valuable of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons to publicly traded securities, and changes in the interest rate environment and the credit markets generally that may affect the price at which similar investments may be made and other relevant factors. In addition, for certain debt and equity investments, we may base our valuation on indicative bid and ask prices provided by an independent third party pricing service. Bid prices reflect the highest price that we and others may be willing to pay. Ask prices represent the lowest price that we and others may be willing to accept for an investment. We generally uses the midpoint of the bid/ask range as our best estimate of fair value of such investment.

Fair value of our debt is estimated by discounting remaining payments using applicable market rates or market quotes for similar instruments at the measurement date, if available.

Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the assets and liabilities may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a market existed for such assets and liabilities and may differ materially from the values that may ultimately be received or settled. Further, such assets and liabilities are generally subject to legal and other restrictions or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded instruments. If we were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, we may realize significantly less than the value at which such investment had previously been recorded.

Our investments and borrowings are subject to market risk. Market risk is the potential for changes in the value due to market changes. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the investments and borrowings are traded.

66


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Revenue Recognition:

Our revenue recognition policies are as follows:

Investments and Related Investment Income: Our board of directors determines the fair value of our portfolio of investments. Interest income is accrued based upon the outstanding principal amount and contractual interest terms of debt investments. Premiums, discounts, and origination fees are amortized or accreted into interest income over the life of the respective debt investment. For investments with contractual PIK interest, which represents contractual interest accrued and added to the principal balance that generally becomes due at maturity, we do not accrue PIK interest if the portfolio company valuation indicates that the PIK interest is not likely to be collectible. Dividend income on preferred equity securities is recorded as dividend income on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are payable by the portfolio company and are expected to be collected. Dividend income on common equity securities is recorded on the record date for private portfolio companies or on the ex-dividend date for publicly traded portfolio companies.

We account for investment transactions on a trade-date basis. Realized gains or losses on investments are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the disposition and the cost basis of investment, without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized. We report changes in fair value of investments that are measured at fair value as a component of the net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in our consolidated statement of operations.

We recorded the fair value of the futures contracts based on the unrealized gain or loss of the reference securities of the futures contracts. Upon maturity or settlement of the futures contracts, we realized a gain or loss based on the difference of the fair value of the futures contracts at inception and the fair value of the futures contracts at settlement or maturity. This gain or loss was included on the consolidated statements of operations as net realized gain (loss) on derivative instruments.

We recorded the fair value of our investment in the TRS based on the unrealized gain or loss of the reference securities of the TRS. For GAAP purposes, realized gains and losses on the TRS were composed of any gains or losses on the referenced portfolio of loans as well as the net interest received or owed at the time of the quarterly settlement. For GAAP purposes, unrealized gains and losses on the TRS were composed of the net interest income earned or interest expense owed during the period that was not previously settled as well as the change in fair value of the referenced portfolio of loans.

Non-accrual: Loans may be left on accrual status during the period we are pursuing repayment of the loan. Management reviews all loans that become past due 90 days or more on principal and interest or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected for possible placement on non-accrual status. We generally reverse accrued interest when a loan is placed on non-accrual. Interest payments received on non- accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment. We restore non-accrual loans to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in our management’s judgment, are likely to remain current. The total fair value of our non-accrual loans was $2.5 million and $3.2 million as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

Income taxes:

We have elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and operate in a manner so as to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs. In order to qualify as a RIC, we are required to meet certain source of income and asset diversification requirements and timely distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each year. We have made and intend to continue to make the requisite distributions to our stockholders, which will generally relieve us from U.S. federal income taxes.

Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to retain taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax year in an amount less than what would trigger payments of federal income tax under Subchapter M of the Code. We would then pay a 4% excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that we determine that our estimated current year annual taxable income may exceed estimated current year distributions, we accrue excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned.

67


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Because federal income tax regulations differ from GAAP, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified within capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain or loss are recognized at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. During the period covered by our predecessor’s financial statements, many of the loans in our portfolio had floating interest rates, and we expect that our loans in the future may also have floating interest rates. These loans are usually based on a floating LIBOR and typically have interest rate re-set provisions that adjust applicable interest rates under such loans to current market rates on a quarterly basis. In addition, the Class A Notes issued as a part of the Debt Securitization have a floating interest rate provision based on 3-month LIBOR that resets quarterly and the Credit Facility has a floating interest rate provision based on 1-month LIBOR that resets daily, and we expect that other credit facilities into which we enter in the future may have floating interest rate provisions.

Assuming that the consolidated statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2012 were to remain constant and that we took no actions to alter our existing interest rate sensitivity, the following table shows the annualized impact of hypothetical base rate changes in interest rates.

Change in interest rates Increase (decrease) in interest income Increase (decrease) in interest expense Net increase (decrease) in investment income
(in thousands)
Down 25 basis points $ (52 ) $ (664 ) $ 612
Up 100 basis points 449 2,655 (2,206 )
Up 200 basis points 6,495 5,309 1,186
Up 300 basis points 13,272 7,964 5,308

Although we believe that this analysis is indicative of our existing sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for changes in the credit market, credit quality, the size and composition of the assets in our portfolio and other business developments, including borrowing under the Debt Securitization or the Credit Facility or other borrowings, that could affect net increase in net assets resulting from operations, or net income. Accordingly, we can offer no assurances that actual results would not differ materially from the analysis above.

We may in the future hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act and applicable commodities laws. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the investments in our portfolio with fixed interest rates.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures.

As of the period covered by this report, we, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on our evaluation, our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of material information about us required to be included in our periodic SEC filings. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, are based upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. There has not been any change in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

68


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part II – Other Information

Item 1: Legal Proceedings.

Although we, GC Advisors and the Administrator may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of our operations in the normal course of business or otherwise, we, GC Advisors and the Administrator are currently not a party to any pending material legal proceedings.

Item 1A: Risk Factors.

None.

Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4: Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5: Other Information.

None.

69


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 6: Exhibits.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Number Description
31.1 Certifications by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2 Certifications by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

* Filed herewith

70


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
Dated: February 7, 2013

By

/s/ David B. Golub
David B. Golub
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: February 7, 2013

By

/s/ Ross A. Teune
Ross A. Teune
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

71


TABLE OF CONTENTS