GGG 10-K Fiscal year ended Dec. 27, 2013

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Commission File No. 001-09249

Graco Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

88 –11th Avenue Northeast

Minneapolis, MN 55413

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(612) 623-6000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share

Shares registered on the New York Stock Exchange.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   Yes X No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   Yes No X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes X No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes X No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer” and “accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer X Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes No X

The aggregate market value of 60,501,329 shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $3,824,289,015 as of June 28, 2013.

60,862,154 shares of common stock were outstanding as of February 4, 2014.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 25, 2014, are incorporated by reference into Part III, as specifically set forth in said Part III.

1

Table of Contents

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT

ON FORM 10-K

2

Table of Contents

Graco Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Graco,” “us,” “we,” or “our Company”) design, manufacture and market premium equipment to pump, meter, mix and dispense a wide variety of fluids and coatings. Our equipment is used around the world in a broad range of industries, including construction; automotive; industrial and machinery; mining, oil and gas; public works and other industries.

We sell our products in the following geographic markets: North, Central and South America (the Americas); Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA); and Asia Pacific. Sales in the Americas represent approximately 54 percent of our Company’s total sales; sales in EMEA approximately 26 percent; and sales in Asia Pacific approximately 20 percent. Part II, Item 7, Results of Operations and Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K contain financial information about these geographic markets. We provide marketing and product design in each of these geographic regions. Our Company also provides application assistance to distributors and employs sales personnel in each of these geographic regions.

We classify our business into three reportable segments, each with a worldwide focus: Industrial, Contractor and Lubrication. Financial information concerning these segments is set forth in Part II, Item 7, Results of Operations and Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K.

Graco Inc. is a Minnesota corporation and was incorporated in 1926. For more information about our Company and our products, services and solutions, visit our website at www.graco.com. The information on the website is not part of this report nor any other report filed or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Our Company’s Strengths and Objectives

We specialize in providing fluid handling equipment solutions for difficult-to-handle materials with high viscosities, abrasive or corrosive properties and multiple component materials that require precise ratio control. We aim to serve niche markets, providing high customer value through product differentiation. Our products enable customers to reduce their use of labor, material and energy, improve quality and achieve environmental compliance.

We strive for, and we believe we achieve, manufacturing and engineering excellence. We centralize our manufacturing operations, which allows for leveraging overhead. Graco has a continuous improvement culture, and we make ongoing capital investments in our manufacturing facilities. Our high quality manufacturing and engineering drive cost savings, reliability and quality in our products.

Our strategies for long-term growth include investing in new products, expanding geographically, targeting new industries and making acquisitions. We make significant investments in developing innovative, high quality products. We strategically add commercial resources focused on expanding third party distribution in growing and emerging markets. We leverage our product technologies for new applications and markets. We make targeted acquisitions, including one small acquisition in 2013 and a second small acquisition in early fiscal year 2014. We coordinate and drive these long-term growth strategies across our geographic regions.

We have strong relationships with material suppliers, end users and channel partners. Our channel partners, which include independent distributors and selective retailers, are present and active throughout our geographic regions. We have been successful in growing third party distribution with experience in specialized end user applications. We intend to further add and develop specialized third party distribution in all geographic regions to reach the new end user markets and applications that are the focus of many of our new product development initiatives.

Our Company’s financial performance has been consistently strong, in part due to an ability to leverage our operations. Our management strives to provide excellent returns for our shareholders.

Manufacturing and Distribution

We manufacture most of our products in the United States. We also manufacture some of our products in Belgium, Romania, Switzerland and the People’s Republic of China (“P.R.C.”). Our manufacturing is aligned with our business segments and is co-located with product development to accelerate technology improvements and improve our cost structure. We do critical machining, assembly and testing in-house for most of our products to control quality, improve response time and maximize cost-effectiveness. We make our products in focused factories and product cells. We source raw materials and components from suppliers around the world.

We sell our equipment primarily through third party distributors worldwide. We primarily distribute our products from our warehouses to distributors, who sell our products to end users. Outside of the United States, our subsidiaries located in Australia,

3

Table of Contents

Belgium, Japan, Italy, Korea, Mexico, the P.R.C. and Switzerland distribute our Company’s products. Significant operations in Maasmechelen, Belgium; St. Gallen, Switzerland; and Shanghai, P.R.C. reinforce our commitment to their regions.

During 2013, manufacturing capacity met business demand. Production requirements in the immediate future are expected to be met through existing facilities, the installation of new automatic and semi-automatic machine tools, efficiency and productivity improvements, the use of leased space and available subcontract services.

For more details on our facilities, see Item 2, Properties .

Product Development

Our primary product development efforts are carried out in facilities located in Minneapolis, Anoka and Rogers, Minnesota; North Canton, Ohio; St. Gallen, Switzerland; and Suzhou, P.R.C. The product development and engineering groups focus on new product design, product improvements, new applications for existing products and strategic technologies for their specific customer base. Our product development efforts focus on bringing new and supplemental return-on-investment value to end users of our products. Total product development expenditures for all segments were $51 million in 2013, $49 million in 2012, and $42 million in 2011.

Our Company consistently makes significant investments in new products, and in 2013 we invested $51 million, or 4.6 percent of sales, in our product development activities. Our product development activities are focused both on upgrades to our current product lines to provide features and benefits that will provide a return-on-investment to our end user customers and on development of products that will reach into new industries and applications to incrementally grow our sales. Sales of products that refresh and upgrade our product lines are measured and compared to planned results. Sales of products that provide entry into new industries and applications are also measured, with additional focus on commercial resources and activities to build specialized third party distribution and market acceptance by end users.

Business Segments

Industrial Segment

The Industrial segment is the largest of our Company’s businesses and represents approximately 59 percent of our total sales. This segment includes the Applied Fluid Technologies division, Industrial Products division and Process division. The Industrial segment primarily makes products for industrial customers that manufacture their own products (such as appliances, vehicles, airplanes and furniture).

Most Industrial segment equipment is sold worldwide through specialized third party distributors, integrators, design centers, original equipment manufacturers and material suppliers. Some products are sold directly to end users. We work with material suppliers to develop or adapt our equipment for use with specialized and hard-to-handle materials. Distributors promote and sell the equipment, hold inventory, provide product application expertise and offer on-site service, technical support and integration capabilities. Integrators implement large individual installations in manufacturing plants where products and services from a number of different manufacturers are aggregated into a single system. Design centers engineer systems for their customers using our products. Original equipment manufacturers incorporate our Company’s Industrial segment products into systems and assemblies that they then supply to their customers.

Applied Fluid Technologies

In addition to making products for use by industrial customers, the Applied Fluid Technologies division also sells equipment for use by construction contractors. The Applied Fluid Technologies division makes equipment to pump, meter, mix and dispense high performance protective coatings and polyurethane foam (protective coatings and foam); and equipment to pump, meter, mix and dispense sealants and adhesives and composites (advanced fluid dispense).

We make plural component proportioning equipment that applies polyurethane foam to insulate walls, roofing, water heaters, refrigerators, hot tubs and other items. This equipment is used in packaging, architectural design and cavity filling. We also make equipment that applies two-component polyurea coatings to tanks, pipes, roofs, truck beds and concrete. In 2013, we purchased EcoQuip Inc. EcoQuip manufactures vapor-abrasive blasting equipment, which is a product category complementary to protective coatings equipment.

Our advanced fluid dispense products include pumps, meters, applicators and valves that meter, mix and dispense sealant and adhesives. This equipment bonds, molds, seals, vacuum encapsulates, laminates and gaskets parts and devices in a wide variety of industrial applications. We also offer advanced composites equipment, which includes gel coat equipment, chop and wet-out systems, resin transfer molding systems and applicators. This equipment is used, for example, in the manufacture of vehicles, aircraft, boats, wind turbines and bridge materials.

4

Table of Contents

A key product strategy of the Applied Fluid Technologies division is to create and sell technologically superior equipment. We also strive to offer a full range of best-value standard products by using a standardized, modular product structure, with pre-engineered products to cover a broad range of configurations and applications.

Industrial Products

The Industrial Products division makes finishing equipment that applies paint and other coatings to products such as motor vehicles, appliances, furniture and other industrial and consumer products. Our finishing equipment includes liquid and powder finishing products. Our finishing equipment pumps, meters and applies liquids on wood, metals and plastics, and coats powder finish on metals. Finishing strategies include creating and selling technologically superior equipment, providing environmental compliance solutions and providing excellent end user service through specialized third party distribution.

Our liquid finishing equipment includes paint circulating and paint supply pumps, paint circulating advanced control systems, plural component coating proportioners, various accessories to filter, transport, agitate and regulate fluid, and spare parts such as spray tips, seals and filter screens. We also offer a variety of applicators that use different methods of atomizing and spraying the paint or other coatings depending on the viscosity of the fluid, the type of finish desired, and the need to maximize transfer efficiency, minimize overspray and minimize the release of volatile organic compounds into the air. Manufacturers in the automotive, automotive feeder, commercial and recreational vehicle, military and utility vehicle, aerospace, farm, construction, wood and general metals industries use our liquid finishing products.

Our powder finishing products are sold under the Gema® trademark. Gema powder systems coat window frames, metallic furniture, automotive components and sheet metal. Primary end-users of our Gema powder finishing products include manufacturers in the construction, home appliance, automotive component and custom coater industries. We strive to provide innovative production solutions in powder coating for end users in emerging and developed markets.

Process

Our Process division makes pumps that move chemicals, petroleum, food and other fluids. The Process division strives to provide high quality, long lasting products with differentiated technology for specified applications. Manufacturers and processors in the food and beverage, dairy, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, oil and gas, electronics, wastewater, mining and ceramics industries use our pumps. We offer pumps for sanitary applications including FDA-compliant 3-A sanitary pumps, diaphragm pumps, transfer pumps and drum and bin unloaders. Our pumps provide a mechanized solution to a traditionally manual process in a factory of moving fluids from large barrels into equipment that dispenses the fluid into jars or other containers. Subsequent to the 2013 fiscal year end, we purchased QED Environmental Systems, Inc. QED Environmental Systems is a manufacturer of fluid management solutions for the environmental monitoring and remediation industries, an industry in which we have had little previous presence.

Contractor Segment

The Contractor segment generated approximately 31 percent of our Company’s 2013 total sales. The Contractor segment directs its product development, sales and marketing efforts toward three broad applications: paint, texture and pavement maintenance. The Contractor segment markets airless paint and texture sprayers (air, gas, hydraulically- and electrically-powered), accessories (spray guns, hoses and filters) and spare parts (tips and seals) to professional painters in the construction and maintenance industries, tradesmen and do-it-yourselfers. The products are distributed primarily through distributor outlets whose main products are paint and other coatings. Contractor products are also sold through general equipment distributors outside of North America. Certain sprayers and accessories are distributed globally through the home center channel.

Contractor equipment includes a wide variety of sprayers, such as sprayers that apply markings on roads, parking lots, fields, bike paths, crosswalks and floors; texture to walls and ceilings; highly viscous coatings to roofs; and paint to walls and structures. Contractor equipment includes scarifiers that remove markings on roads and other surfaces. We also offer several models of professional grade handheld paint sprayers.

Our Contractor segment sells broad product families with multiple offerings. Our Contractor segment strives for technological innovation in its products. Painters are encouraged to upgrade their equipment regularly to take advantage of the new and/or more advanced features. The Contractor segment strives to expand base markets using new and core technologies.

Contractor products are marketed and sold in all major geographic areas. We continue to add distributors throughout the world that specialize in the sale of Contractor products. Throughout the world, we are pursuing a broad strategy of converting contractors accustomed to manually applying paint and other coatings by brush-and-roller to spray technology.

5

Table of Contents

Lubrication Segment

The Lubrication segment represented approximately 10 percent of our Company’s sales during 2013. The Lubrication segment focuses its engineering, marketing and sales efforts on two main applications: vehicle services and industrial lubrication. The Lubrication segment markets and sells our lubrication equipment worldwide, although the bulk of its sales come from North America. Our lubrication products are sold through independent third party distributors and directly to original equipment manufacturers. Our key Lubrication segment strategies are to provide products with differentiated features that are unique to the industries served and to develop products for geographic expansion. We continue to expand our Lubrication segment sales and marketing resources in EMEA, Asia Pacific, and South and Central America.

In vehicle services, we supply pumps, hose reels, meters, valves and accessories. Our customers include fast oil change facilities, service garages, fleet service centers, automobile dealerships, auto parts stores, service truck builders and heavy equipment service centers.

In industrial lubrication, we offer systems, components and accessories for the automatic lubrication of industrial and commercial equipment, compressors, turbines and on- and off-road vehicles. We offer products that automatically lubricate bearings, gears and generators, and products that evacuate and dispense lubricants. Industries served include gas transmission and petrochemical, pulp and paper, mining and construction, agricultural equipment, food and beverage, material handling, metal manufacturing, wind energy and oil and gas exploration. In 2013, we introduced new electric grease pumps for the mining and heavy equipment industries.

Raw Materials

The primary materials and components in our products are steel of various alloys, sizes and hardness; specialty stainless steel and aluminum bar stock, tubing and castings; tungsten carbide; electric and gas motors; injection molded plastics; sheet metal; forgings; powdered metal; hoses; and electronic components. The materials and components that we use are generally adequately available through multiple sources of supply. To manage cost, we engage in significant global sourcing of materials and components, primarily in the Asia Pacific region.

In 2013, our raw material costs were fairly stable, although we experienced price decreases in copper, stainless steel, aluminum and rare earth metals. These price decreases were somewhat offset by price increases in certain specialty resins and steels. We did not experience any significant shortages of materials in 2013.

We endeavor to address fluctuations in the price and availability of various materials and components through adjustable surcharges and credits, close management of current suppliers, price negotiations and an intensive search for new suppliers. We have performed risk assessments of our key suppliers, and we factor the risks identified into our commodity plans.

Intellectual Property

We own a number of patents and have patent applications pending both in the United States and in other countries, license our patents to others, and are a licensee of patents owned by others. In our opinion, our business is not materially dependent upon any one or more of these patents or licenses. Our Company also owns a number of trademarks in the United States and foreign countries, including registered trademarks for “GRACO,” “Gema,” several forms of a capital “G,” and various product trademarks that are material to our business, inasmuch as they identify Graco and our products to our customers.

Competition

We encounter a wide variety of competitors that vary by product, industry and geographic area. Each of our segments generally has several competitors. Our competitors are both U.S. and foreign companies and range in size. We believe that our ability to compete depends upon product quality, product reliability, innovation, design, customer support and service, personal relationships, specialized engineering and competitive pricing. Although no competitor duplicates all of our products, some competitors are larger than our Company, both in terms of sales of directly competing products and in terms of total sales and financial resources. We also face competitors with different cost structures and expectations of profitability and these companies may offer competitive products at lower prices. We may have to refresh our product line and continue development of our distribution channel to stay competitive. We are also facing competitors who illegally sell counterfeits of our products or otherwise infringe on our intellectual property rights. We may have to increase our intellectual property enforcement activities.

Environmental Protection

Our compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations did not have a material effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position during the fiscal year ended December 27, 2013.

6

Table of Contents

Employees

As of December 27, 2013, we employed approximately 2,700 persons, excluding the employees of the held separate Liquid Finishing businesses (see below). Of this total, approximately 850 were employees based outside the United States, and 800 were hourly factory workers in the United States. None of our Company’s United States employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Various national industry-wide labor agreements apply to certain employees in various countries outside the United States. Compliance with such agreements has no material effect on our Company or our operations.

Acquisition and Planned Divestiture of ITW Liquid Finishing Businesses

We purchased the finishing businesses of Illinois Tool Works Inc. (“ITW Finishing Group”) in April 2012 (the “Finishing Brands Acquisition”). The acquisition included powder and liquid finishing equipment operations, technologies and brands. In liquid finishing, brands include Binks® spray finishing equipment, DeVilbiss® spray guns and accessories, Ransburg® electrostatic equipment and accessories and BGK curing technology (“Liquid Finishing”). In powder finishing, we acquired the Gema® business (“Powder Finishing”). In March 2012, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued an order for our Company to hold the Liquid Finishing assets separate from our other businesses. In May 2012, the FTC issued a proposed decision and order that requires us to sell the held separate Liquid Finishing business assets no later than 180 days from the date the order becomes final. The FTC has not yet issued a final decision and order. We believe that the FTC will require us to sell all of the Liquid Finishing assets that are currently held separate. We have retained the services of an investment bank to help us market the held separate businesses and identify potential buyers.

Changes in Laws and Regulations – Changes may impact how we can do business and the cost of doing business around the world.

The speed and frequency of implementation and the complexity of new or revised laws and regulations globally appear to be increasing. In addition, as our business grows and/or geographically expands, we may become subject to laws and regulations previously inapplicable to our business. These laws and regulations increase our costs of doing business, may affect the manner in which our products will be produced or delivered and may impact our long-term ability to provide returns to our shareholders.

Economic Environment – Demand for our products depends on the level of commercial and industrial activity worldwide.

An economic downturn or financial market turmoil may depress demand for our equipment in all major geographies and markets. If our distributors and original equipment manufacturers are unable to purchase our products because of unavailable credit or unfavorable credit terms or are simply unwilling to purchase our products, our net sales and earnings will be adversely affected. An economic downturn may affect our ability to satisfy the financial covenants in the terms of our financing arrangements.

Growth Strategies – Our growth strategies may not provide the return on investment desired if we are not successful in implementation of these strategies.

Making acquisitions, investing in new products, expanding geographically and targeting new industries are among our growth strategies. We may not obtain the return on investment desired if we are not successful in implementing these growth strategies. Suitable acquisitions must be located, completed and effectively integrated into or added to our existing businesses or corporate structure for this growth strategy to be successful. We may not be able to obtain financing at a reasonable cost. We may be unsuccessful in acquiring and effectively integrating into or adding businesses to our current operations or corporate structure, and may not realize projected efficiencies and cost-savings from the businesses we acquire. We cannot predict how customers, competitors, suppliers and employees will react to the acquisitions that we make. We make significant investments in developing products that have innovative features and differentiated technology in their industries and in niche markets. We are expanding the geographies in which we do business with third party distributors. We cannot predict whether and when we will be able to realize the expected financial results and accretive effect of the acquisitions that we make, the new products that we develop and the channel expansions that we make.

Acquisition - Our acquisition of the finishing businesses of ITW includes a requirement that we divest the acquired Liquid Finishing businesses, which has not been completed and remains subject to FTC approval.

On April 2, 2012, the Company closed its $650 million acquisition of the ITW finishing businesses. The acquisition added the Gema business, a global leader in powder coating technology, which represented approximately one-third of the businesses purchased. The remaining two-thirds of the acquisition is a collection of Liquid Finishing businesses, which the FTC has ordered to be held separate

7

Table of Contents

from Gema and other Graco businesses while the FTC investigates and considers a settlement proposal from Graco. In compliance with the FTC’s order, the Liquid Finishing businesses are being run independently by existing management under the supervision of a trustee who reports directly to the FTC. In May 2012, the FTC issued a proposed decision and order, subject to a 30-day comment period, which requires Graco to sell the Liquid Finishing business assets, including business activities related to the development, manufacture, and sale of Liquid Finishing products under the Binks®, DeVilbiss®, Ransburg® and BGK brand names, no later than 180 days from the date the order becomes final. The FTC has not yet issued its final decision and order. The Company has retained the services of an investment bank to help it market the Liquid Finishing businesses and identify potential buyers. Until the sale of the Liquid Finishing business assets is completed, Graco must continue to hold the Liquid Finishing business assets separate from its other businesses and maintain them as viable and competitive. The hold separate order requires the Company to provide sufficient resources to maintain the viability, competitiveness and marketability of the Liquid Finishing businesses, including general funds, capital, working capital and reimbursement of losses. We cannot predict to what extent or when the required regulatory approvals will be obtained. We cannot predict the extent of the acquired businesses required to be divested, although we believe that the FTC will require us to sell all of the Liquid Finishing business assets that are currently held separate. Additional risk factors include whether the Company will be able to find a suitable purchaser(s) and structure the divestiture on acceptable terms, and whether the Company will be able to complete a divestiture in a time frame that is satisfactory to the FTC.

Political Instability – Uncertainty surrounding political leadership may limit our growth opportunities.

Domestic political instability, including government shut downs, may limit our ability to grow our business. International political instability may prevent us from expanding our business into certain geographies and may also limit our ability to grow our business. Terrorist activities and civil disturbances may harm our business.

Intellectual Property – Demand for our products may be affected by new entrants who copy our products and/or infringe on our intellectual property.

From time to time, our Company has been faced with instances where competitors have infringed or improperly used our intellectual property and/or taken advantage of our design and development efforts. The ability to enforce intellectual property varies across jurisdictions. Asian copiers are becoming more prevalent. If our Company is unable to effectively meet these challenges, they could adversely affect our revenues and profits and hamper our ability to grow.

Suppliers – Risks associated with foreign sourcing, supply interruption, delays in raw material or component delivery, supply shortages and counterfeit components may adversely affect our production or profitability.

We are sourcing an increasing percentage of our materials and components from suppliers outside the United States, and from suppliers within the United States who engage in foreign sourcing. Long lead times or supply interruptions associated with a global supply base may reduce our flexibility and make it more difficult to respond promptly to fluctuations in demand or respond quickly to product quality problems. Changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies and fluctuations in the price of commodities may impact the manufacturing costs of our products and affect our profitability. Protective tariffs, unpredictable changes in duty rates, and trade regulation changes may make certain foreign-sourced parts no longer competitively priced. Long supply chains may be disrupted by environmental events or other political factors. Raw materials may become limited in availability from certain regions. Port labor disputes may delay shipments. We source a large volume and a variety of electronic components, which exposes us to an increased risk of counterfeit components entering our supply chain. If counterfeit components unknowingly become part of our products, we may need to stop delivery and rebuild our products. We may be subject to warranty claims and may need to recall products.

Foreign Operations – Conducting business internationally exposes our Company to risks that could harm our business.

In 2013, approximately 55 percent of our sales were generated by customers located outside the United States. We are increasing our presence in advancing economies. Operating and selling outside of the United States exposes us to certain risks that could adversely impact our sales volume, rate of growth or profitability. These risks include: complying with foreign legal and regulatory requirements, international trade factors (export controls, trade sanctions, duties, tariff barriers and other restrictions), protection of our proprietary technology in certain countries, potentially burdensome taxes, potential difficulties staffing and managing local operations, and changes in exchange rates. Changes in exchange rates will impact our reported sales and earnings and may make it difficult for some of our distributors to purchase products.

Competition – Our success depends upon our ability to develop, market and sell new products that meet our customers’ needs, and anticipate industry changes.

Our profitability will be affected if we do not develop new products and technologies that meet our customers’ needs. Our ability to develop, market and sell products that meet our customers’ needs depends upon a number of factors, including anticipating the

8

Table of Contents

features and products that our customers will need in the future, identifying and entering into new markets, and training our distributors. Changes in industries in which we participate, including consolidation of competitors and customers, could affect our success. Price competition and competitor strategies could affect our success.

Legal Proceedings – Costs associated with claims, litigation, administrative proceedings and regulatory reviews, and potentially adverse outcomes, may affect our profitability.

As our Company grows, we are at an increased risk of being a target in litigation, administrative proceedings and regulatory reviews. The cost of defending such matters appears to be increasing, particularly in the United States. We may also need to pursue claims or litigation to protect our interests. Such costs may adversely affect our Company’s profitability. Our businesses expose us to potential toxic tort, product liability and commercial claims. Successful claims against the Company may adversely affect our results.

Anti-Corruption Laws – We may incur costs and suffer damages if our employees, agents, distributors or suppliers violate anti-bribery, anti-corruption or trade laws and regulations.

Bribery, corruption and trade laws and regulations, and enforcement thereof, is increasing in frequency and severity on a global basis. If our internal controls and compliance program do not successfully prevent our employees, agents, distributors, suppliers and other third parties with whom we do business from violating anti-corruption laws, we may incur defense costs, fines, penalties and reputational damage.

Major Customers – Our Contractor segment depends on a few large customers for a significant portion of its sales. Significant declines in the level of purchases by these customers could reduce our sales and impact segment profitability.

Our Contractor segment derives a significant amount of revenue from a few large customers. Substantial decreases in purchases by these customers, difficulty in collecting amounts due or the loss of their business would adversely affect the profitability of this segment. The business of these customers is dependent upon the economic vitality of the construction and home maintenance markets. If these markets decline, the business of our customers could be adversely affected and their purchases of our equipment could decrease.

Variable Industries – Our success may be affected by variations in the construction and automotive industries.

Our business may be affected by fluctuations in residential, commercial and institutional building and remodeling activity. Changes in construction materials and techniques may also impact our business. Our business may also be affected by fluctuations in the automotive industry.

Security Breaches – Intrusion into our information systems may impact our business.

Security breaches or intrusion into our information systems, and the breakdown, interruption in or inadequate upgrading or maintenance of our information processing software, hardware or networks may impact our business. Security breaches or intrusion into the systems or data of the third parties with whom we conduct business may also harm our business.

Natural Disasters – Our operations are at risk of damage or destruction by natural disasters.

The loss of, or substantial damage to, one of our facilities could make it difficult to supply our customers with product and provide our employees with work. Flooding, tornadoes, typhoons, unusually heavy precipitation or earthquakes could adversely impact our operations.

None.

9

Table of Contents

Our facilities are in satisfactory condition, suitable for their respective uses, and are generally adequate to meet current needs. A description of our principal facilities is set forth in the chart below. Facilities are used by all segments, unless otherwise noted.

10

Table of Contents

11

Table of Contents

Our Company is engaged in routine litigation, administrative proceedings and regulatory reviews incident to our business. It is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these unresolved matters, but management believes that they will not have a material effect upon our operations or consolidated financial position.

Not applicable.

Executive Officers of Our Company

The following are all the executive officers of Graco Inc. as of February 18, 2014:

Patrick J. McHale, 52, is President and Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since June 2007. He served as Vice President and General Manager, Lubrication Equipment Division from June 2003 to June 2007. He was Vice President, Manufacturing and Distribution Operations from April 2001 to June 2003. He served as Vice President, Contractor Equipment Division from February 2000 to April 2001. From September 1999 to February 2000, he was Vice President, Lubrication Equipment Division. Prior to September 1999, he held various manufacturing management positions in Minneapolis, Minnesota; Plymouth, Michigan; and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Mr. McHale joined the Company in 1989.

David M. Ahlers, 55, became Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Communications in April 2010. From September 2008 through March 2010, he served as the Company’s Vice President, Human Resources. Prior to joining Graco, Mr. Ahlers held various human resources positions, including, most recently, Chief Human Resources Officer and Senior Managing Director of GMAC Residential Capital, from August 2003 to August 2008. He joined the Company in 2008.

Caroline M. Chambers, 49, was elected Vice President, Corporate Controller and Information Systems on December 6, 2013. She has also served as the Company’s principal accounting officer since September 2007. From April 2009 to December 2013, she was Vice President and Corporate Controller. She served as Vice President and Controller from December 2006 to April 2009. She was Corporate Controller from October 2005 to December 2006 and Director of Information Systems from July 2003 through September 2005. Prior to becoming Director of Information Systems, she held various management positions in the internal audit and accounting departments. Prior to joining Graco, Ms. Chambers was an auditor with Deloitte & Touche in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Paris, France. Ms. Chambers joined the Company in 1992.

Mark D. Eberlein, 53, is Vice President and General Manager, Process Division, a position he has held since January 2013. From November 2008 to December 2012, he was Director, Business Development, Industrial Products Division. He was Director, Manufacturing Operations, Industrial Products Division from January to October 2008. From 2001 to 2008, he was Manufacturing Operations Manager of a variety of Graco business divisions. Prior to joining Graco, Mr. Eberlein worked as an engineer at Honeywell and at Sheldahl. He joined the Company in 1996.

Karen Park Gallivan, 57, became Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in September 2005. She was Vice President, Human Resources from January 2003 to September 2005. Prior to joining Graco, she was Vice President of Human Resources and Communications at Syngenta Seeds, Inc. from January 1999 to January 2003. From 1988 through January 1999, she was the general counsel of Novartis Nutrition Corporation. Prior to joining Novartis, Ms. Gallivan was an attorney with the law firm of Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, L.L.P. She joined the Company in 2003.

James A. Graner, 69, became Chief Financial Officer in September 2005, a position he held in conjunction with Treasurer from September 2005 to June 2011. He served as Vice President and Controller from March 1994 to September 2005. He was Treasurer from May 1993 through February 1994. Prior to becoming Treasurer, he held various managerial positions in the treasury, accounting and information systems departments. He joined the Company in 1974.

Dale D. Johnson, 59, became Vice President and General Manager, Contractor Equipment Division in April 2001. From January 2000 through March 2001, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer. From December 1996 to January 2000, he was Vice President, Contractor Equipment Division. Prior to becoming the Director of Marketing, Contractor Equipment Division in June 1996, he held various marketing and sales positions in the Contractor Equipment division and the Industrial Equipment division. He joined the Company in 1976.

Jeffrey P. Johnson, 54, became Vice President and General Manager, EMEA in January 2013. From February 2008 to December 2012 he was Vice President and General Manager, Asia Pacific. He served as Director of Sales and Marketing, Applied Fluid Technologies Division, from June 2006 until February 2008. Prior to joining Graco, he held various sales and marketing positions,

12

Table of Contents

including, most recently, President of Johnson Krumwiede Roads, a full-service advertising agency, and European sales manager at General Motors Corp. He joined the Company in 2006.

David M. Lowe, 58, became Executive Vice President, Industrial Products Division in April 2012. From February 2005 to April 2012, he was Vice President and General Manager, Industrial Products Division. He was Vice President and General Manager, European Operations from September 1999 to February 2005. Prior to becoming Vice President, Lubrication Equipment Division in December 1996, he was Treasurer. Mr. Lowe joined the Company in 1995.

Bernard J. Moreau, 53, is Vice President and General Manager, South and Central America, a position he has held since January 2013. From November 2003 to December 2012, he was Sales and Marketing Director, EMEA, Industrial/Automotive Equipment Division. From January 1997 to October 2003, he was Sales Manager, Middle East, Africa and East Europe. Prior to 1997, he worked in various Graco sales engineering and sales management positions, mainly to support Middle East, Africa and southern Europe territories. He joined the Company in 1985.

Peter J. O’Shea, 49, became Vice President and General Manager, Asia Pacific in January 2013. From January 2012 until December 2012, he was Director of Sales and Marketing, Industrial Products Division, and from 2008 to 2012, he was Director of Sales and Marketing, Industrial Products Division and Applied Fluid Technologies Division. He was Country Manager, Australia - New Zealand from 2005 to 2008, and from 2002 to 2005 he served as Business Development Manager, Australia - New Zealand. Prior to becoming Business Development Manager, Australia - New Zealand, he worked in various Graco sales management positions. Mr. O’Shea joined the Company in 1995.

Charles L. Rescorla, 62, was elected Vice President, Corporate Manufacturing, Distribution Operations and Corporate Development on December 6, 2013. From June 2011 to December 2013, he was Vice President, Corporate Manufacturing, Information Systems and Distribution Operations. He was Vice President, Manufacturing, Information Systems and Distribution Operations from April 2009 to June 2011. He served as Vice President, Manufacturing and Distribution Operations from September 2005 to April 2009. From June 2003 to September 2005, he was Vice President, Manufacturing/Distribution Operations and Information Systems. From April 2001 until June 2003, he was Vice President and General Manager, Industrial/Automotive Equipment Division. Prior to April 2001, he held various positions in manufacturing and engineering management. Mr. Rescorla joined the Company in 1988.

Christian E. Rothe, 40, became Vice President and Treasurer in June 2011. Prior to joining Graco, he held various positions in business development, accounting and finance, including, most recently, at Gardner Denver, Inc., a manufacturer of highly engineered products, as Vice President, Treasurer from January 2011 to June 2011, Vice President - Finance, Industrial Products Group from October 2008 to January 2011, and Director, Strategic Planning and Development from October 2006 to October 2008. Mr. Rothe joined the Company in 2011.

Mark W. Sheahan, 49, became Vice President and General Manager, Applied Fluid Technologies Division in February 2008. He served as Chief Administrative Officer from September 2005 until February 2008, and was Vice President and Treasurer from December 1998 to September 2005. Prior to becoming Treasurer in December 1996, he was Manager, Treasury Services. He joined the Company in 1995.

Brian J. Zumbolo, 44, became Vice President and General Manager, Lubrication Equipment Division in August 2007. He was Director of Sales and Marketing, Lubrication Equipment and Applied Fluid Technologies, Asia Pacific, from November 2006 through July 2007. From February 2005 to November 2006, he was the Director of Sales and Marketing, High Performance Coatings and Foam, Applied Fluid Technologies Division. Mr. Zumbolo was the Director of Sales and Marketing, Finishing Equipment from May 2004 to February 2005. Prior to May 2004, he held various marketing positions in the Industrial Equipment division. Mr. Zumbolo joined the Company in 1999.

Except as otherwise noted above, the Board of Directors elected or re-elected the above executive officers to their current positions on December 7, 2012, effective January 1, 2013.

13

Table of Contents

Graco Common Stock

Graco common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “GGG.” As of February 4, 2014, the share price was $67.67 and there were 60,862,154 shares outstanding and 2,767 common shareholders of record, which includes nominees or broker dealers holding stock on behalf of an estimated 42,000 beneficial owners.

High and low sales prices for the Company’s common stock and dividends declared for each quarterly period in the past two years were as follows:

The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the common stock of the Company for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones Industrial Machinery Index over the same period (assuming the value of the investment in Graco common stock and each index was $100 on December 26, 2008, and all dividends were reinvested).

14

Table of Contents

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On September 14, 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to 6,000,000 shares of its outstanding common stock, primarily through open-market transactions. The authorization expires on September 30, 2015.

In addition to shares purchased under the Board authorization, the Company purchases shares of common stock held by employees who wish to tender owned shares to satisfy the exercise price or tax withholding on stock option exercises.

Information on issuer purchases of equity securities follows:

Graco Inc. and Subsidiaries (in thousands, except per share amounts)

Net sales in 2012 included $93 million from Powder Finishing operations acquired in April 2012. The Company used long-term borrowings and available cash balances to complete the $668 million purchase of Powder Finishing and Liquid Finishing businesses in 2012.

15

Table of Contents

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis reviews significant factors affecting the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements. The discussion is organized in the following sections:

Overview

Graco designs, manufactures and markets systems and equipment to pump, meter, mix and dispense a wide variety of fluids and coatings. The Company specializes in equipment for applications that involve difficult-to-handle materials with high viscosities, materials with abrasive or corrosive properties and multiple-component materials that require precise ratio control. Graco sells primarily through independent third-party distributors worldwide to industrial and contractor end-users. More than half of our sales are outside of the United States. Graco’s business is classified by management into three reportable segments, each responsible for product development, manufacturing, marketing and sales of their products.

Graco’s key strategies include developing and marketing new products, leveraging products and technologies into additional, growing end user markets, expanding distribution globally and completing strategic acquisitions that provide additional channel and technologies. Long-term financial growth targets accompany these strategies, including our expectation of 10 percent revenue growth and 12 percent consolidated net earnings growth. In 2013, the Process division was created within the Industrial segment to provide specific focus on development of product and channel related to industrial in-plant applications. In addition, a regional management team was formed to focus on building commercial resources in South and Central America. We continued to develop new products in each division including products that are expected to drive incremental sales growth, such as the development of equipment for packaging applications as well as continued refresh and upgrades of existing product lines. We acquired EcoQuip and QED, with combined annual revenues of approximately $30 million. Both acquisitions were completed in December 2013, although the QED acquisition closed subsequent to fiscal year end.

Manufacturing is a key competency of the Company. Our management team in Minneapolis provides strategic manufacturing expertise, and is also responsible for factories not fully aligned with a single division. Our primary manufacturing facilities are in the United States and Switzerland, and our primary distribution facilities are located in the United States, Belgium, Switzerland, P.R.C., Japan, Korea and Australia.

Finishing Brands Acquisition

On April 2, 2012, we completed the Finishing Brands acquisition, including Powder Finishing operations and Liquid Finishing operations. Results of the Powder Finishing business have been included in the Industrial segment since the date of acquisition. Pursuant to the hold separate order issued by the FTC, the Liquid Finishing business is being held separate from the rest of Graco’s businesses until the FTC has issued its final order and the divestiture of the Liquid Finishing business is completed.

We have retained the services of an investment bank to help us market the Liquid Finishing businesses and identify potential buyers. While we seek a buyer, we must continue to hold the Liquid Finishing business assets separate from our other businesses and maintain them as viable and competitive. In accordance with the hold separate order, the Liquid Finishing businesses are managed independently by experienced Liquid Finishing business managers, under the supervision of a trustee appointed by the FTC, who reports directly to the FTC.

Under terms of the hold separate order, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the Liquid Finishing businesses that most significantly impact the economic performance of those businesses. Therefore, we have determined that the Liquid Finishing businesses are variable interest entities for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary and that they should not be consolidated. Furthermore, the Company does not have a controlling interest in the Liquid Finishing businesses, nor is it able to exert significant influence over the Liquid Finishing businesses. Consequently, our investment in the shares of the Liquid Finishing businesses has been reflected as a cost-method investment on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 27, 2013 and December 28, 2012, and their results of operations have not been consolidated with those of the Company. As a cost-method investment, income is recognized based on dividends received from current earnings of Liquid Finishing. Dividends of $28 million

16

Table of Contents

and $12 million received in 2013 and 2012, respectively, are included in other expense (income) on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. We evaluate our cost-method investment for other-than-temporary impairment at each reporting period. As of December 27, 2013, we evaluated our investment in Liquid Finishing and determined that there was no impairment.

Results of Operations

Net sales, operating earnings, net earnings and earnings per share were as follows (in millions except per share amounts):

2013 Summary:

2012 Summary:

17

Table of Contents

The following table presents net sales by geographic region (in millions):

In 2013, sales in the Americas increased by 11 percent in total, with increases of 6 percent in the Industrial segment, 22 percent in the Contractor segment and flat in the Lubrication segment as compared to the prior year. The increase in the Americas was led by the Contractor segment, which benefited from growth in U.S. housing starts and construction spending. Increased sales in the Industrial segment were driven by improvement in a variety of general industrial, construction and process-related end-markets. Sales in the Lubrication segment reflected modest demand growth in vehicle service applications and a low rate of investment by industrial lubrication customers.

In 2013, sales in EMEA increased by 10 percent (8 percent at consistent translation rates). Sales in the Industrial segment increased by 12 percent (9 percent at consistent translation rates). Sales increased by 4 percent in the Contractor segment (2 percent at consistent translation rates) and increased by 14 percent in the Lubrication segment (12 percent at consistent translation rates). We continued to see growth during 2013 in the emerging markets of EMEA, though end-markets in many industries remained weak in Western Europe throughout much of the year.

In 2013, sales in Asia Pacific grew by 3 percent (5 percent at consistent translation rates). Sales increased by 7 percent in the Industrial segment (10 percent at consistent translation rates). Sales in the Contractor segment decreased by 4 percent (3 percent at consistent translation rates) and sales in the Lubrication segment decreased by 13 percent (10 percent at consistent translation rates). Industrial project activity was strong in the fourth quarter, which brought the Industrial segment back to modest growth for the year. However, we continue to see lack of growth in a number of markets throughout Asia Pacific, including shipyards, container manufacturing, heavy machinery, manufacturing, housing, paint and mining, and we face an increased level of competition in the region.

In 2012, sales in the Americas increased by 13 percent, with increases of 19 percent in the Industrial segment, 5 percent in the Contractor segment and 13 percent in the Lubrication segment as compared to the prior year. Growth related to the acquired Powder Finishing business was 4 percentage points. The increase in the Americas reflected strength across a range of product lines with growth in a number of industrial end-markets as well as growth in the housing and construction industries.

In 2012, sales in EMEA increased by 22 percent (28 percent at consistent translation rates), primarily due to the sales from Powder Finishing of $52 million since the acquisition. Sales of legacy Graco products in the Industrial segment decreased by 2 percent during 2012 (increased by 3 percent at consistent translation rates). Sales decreased by 5 percent in the Contractor segment (flat at consistent translation rates) and increased by 2 percent in the Lubrication segment (7 percent at consistent translation rates). We continued to see growth during 2012 in the emerging markets of Eastern Europe and the Middle East, though end-markets in many industries remained weak in Western Europe.

In 2012, sales in Asia Pacific grew by 5 percent overall. Sales of Powder Finishing equipment were $22 million from the date of acquisition. Sales decreased by 7 percent in 2012 for legacy Graco products in the Industrial segment. Sales in the Contractor

18

Table of Contents

segment grew by 4 percent and sales in the Lubrication segment decreased by 10 percent. Activity levels in many end-markets remained challenging throughout the region and across product categories throughout 2012.

The following table presents components of net sales change:

The following table presents an overview of components of operating earnings as a percentage of net sales:

2013 Compared to 2012

Operating earnings as a percentage of sales were 25 percent in 2013 as compared to 22 percent in 2012. Expense leverage and reductions of acquisition and divestiture costs led to the improvements in operating earnings as a percentage of sales.

Gross profit margin as a percentage of sales was 55 percent in 2013 as compared to 54 percent in 2012. The favorable effect of realized price increases and higher production volume offset the unfavorable effect of changes in product mix, including increased sales of powder finishing equipment and Contractor segment sales. For 2012, non-recurring purchase accounting effects reduced the gross margin percentage by approximately 1 percentage point.

Operating expenses for the year increased $2 million over 2012 with business activity-related increases largely offset by decreases in acquisition and divestiture costs in 2013. Acquisition and divestiture costs were $2 million in 2013, as compared to $16 million in 2012. Overall, product development spending was 5 percent of sales in 2013, consistent with 2012.

Interest expense was $18 million in 2013, a decrease of $1 million from 2012. Other expense (income) included dividends received from the Liquid Finishing businesses that are held separate from the Company’s other businesses. Dividends for the year totaled $28 million in 2013 and $12 million in 2012.

19

Table of Contents

The effective income tax rate was 27 percent for the year as compared to 31 percent in 2012. The lower rate for 2013 reflected the effects of higher after-tax dividend income received from the Liquid Finishing businesses and the federal R&D credit that was renewed in 2013, effective retroactive to the beginning of 2012. There was no R&D credit recognized in 2012.

2012 Compared to 2011

Operating earnings as a percentage of sales were 22 percent in 2012 as compared to 25 percent in 2011. The impact of purchase accounting related to the Powder Finishing acquisition, higher acquisition/divestiture costs and an increase in pension costs were partially offset by other operating improvements.

Gross profit margin as a percentage of sales was 54 percent in 2012 as compared to 56 percent in 2011. Non-recurring purchase accounting effects totaling $7 million related to acquired inventory with the Powder Finishing operations reduced the gross margin percentage by approximately 1 percentage point. Strong operating performance and cost management improved margins on the legacy Graco operations, partially offsetting the lower margin rates on acquired Powder Finishing operations.

Operating expenses for the year increased $45 million, including $25 million from Powder Finishing operations, an increase of $8 million for acquisition and divestiture costs, an increase of $5 million in product development spending and an increase of $5 million in pension expense. Overall, product development spending was 5 percent of sales in 2012, consistent with 2011.

The purchase of Powder Finishing and Liquid Finishing operations had significant impacts on interest expense (an increase of $10 million for the year) and other expense (income), which included dividend income of $12 million received from the Liquid Finishing businesses held as a cost-method investment.

The effective income tax rate was 31 percent for the year as compared to 32 percent in 2011. The 2012 effective tax rate was reduced by the effect of the investment income from the Liquid Finishing businesses held separate and the effect of a tax rate change on deferred liabilities related to a tax holiday received in a foreign jurisdiction.

Segment Results

The following table presents net sales and operating earnings by business segment (in millions):

Management looks at economic and financial indicators relevant to each segment and geography to gauge the business environment, as noted in the discussion below for each segment.

20

Table of Contents

Industrial

The following table presents net sales, components of net sales change and operating earnings as a percentage of sales for the Industrial segment (dollars in millions):

In 2013, sales in the Industrial segment totaled $652 million, an increase of 8 percent from the prior year. First quarter 2013 sales from the acquired Powder Finishing operations contributed approximately 5 percentage points to the 2013 sales growth. Overall for the Industrial segment, sales increased by 6 percent in the Americas, increased 12 percent in EMEA (9 percent at consistent translation rates) and increased 7 percent in Asia Pacific (10 percent at consistent translation rates).

Operating earnings as a percentage of sales were 32 percent in 2013 as compared to 31 percent in 2012. The effects of purchase accounting related to inventory reduced the operating margin rate for 2012 by approximately 1 percentage point.

In 2012, sales in the Industrial segment totaled $603 million, an increase of 20 percent from the prior year, including $93 million from Powder Finishing operations acquired in April 2012. Without Powder Finishing, sales increased by 10 percent in the Americas, decreased 2 percent in EMEA (3 percent increase at consistent translation rates) and decreased 7 percent in Asia Pacific.

Operating earnings as a percentage of sales were 31 percent in 2012 as compared to 35 percent in 2011. Powder Finishing operations contributed to segment earnings, but at a lower rate on sales, which drove the decrease in the operating margin for the Industrial segment.

In this segment, sales in each geographic region are significant and management looks at economic and financial indicators in each region, including gross domestic product, industrial production, capital investment rates, automobile production, building construction and the level of the U.S. dollar versus the euro, the Canadian dollar, the Australian dollar and various Asian currencies.

21

Table of Contents

Contractor

The following table presents net sales, components of net sales change and operating earnings as a percentage of sales for the Contractor segment (dollars in millions):

In 2013, sales in the Contractor segment increased 15 percent as compared to 2012. By geography, sales increased by 22 percent in the Americas, increased 4 percent in Europe (2 percent at consistent translation rates) and decreased 4 percent in Asia Pacific.

Operating earnings as a percentage of sales were 21 percent in 2013 as compared to 18 percent in 2012. Higher sales and the leveraging of expenses drove the improvement of operating earnings as a percentage of sales.

In 2012, sales in the Contractor segment increased 3 percent. By geography, sales increased by 5 percent in the Americas, decreased 5 percent in Europe (flat at consistent translation rates) and increased 4 percent in Asia Pacific.

Higher sales and the leveraging of expenses led to improvements in operating earnings as a percentage of sales.

In this segment, sales in all regions are significant and management reviews economic and financial indicators in each region, including levels of residential, commercial and institutional construction, remodeling rates and interest rates. Management also reviews gross domestic product for the regions and the level of the U.S. dollar versus the euro and other currencies.

Lubrication

The following table presents net sales, components of net sales change and operating earnings as a percentage of sales for the Lubrication segment (dollars in millions):

In 2013, sales in the Lubrication segment decreased by 1 percentage point compared to 2012. By geography, sales were flat in the Americas, increased 14 percent in EMEA, and decreased 13 percent in Asia Pacific.

22

Table of Contents

In 2012, sales in the Lubrication segment increased 7 percent. By geography, sales increased by 13 percent in the Americas, 2 percent in Europe (7 percent at consistent translation rates) and decreased 10 percent in Asia Pacific.

Operating earnings were $23 million or 20 percent of sales as compared to $19 million or 18 percent of sales in 2011. Improved gross margin rates and leveraging of expenses led to improvement in operating earnings as a percentage of sales.

Although the Americas represent the substantial majority of sales for the Lubrication segment and indicators in that region are the most significant, management monitors indicators such as levels of gross domestic product, capital investment, industrial production and mining activity worldwide.

Unallocated corporate

(in millions)

Unallocated corporate includes items such as stock compensation, non-service portion of pension expense, bad debt expense, contributions to the Company’s charitable foundation and certain other charges or credits driven by corporate decisions, including expense related to acquisition/divestiture activities. In 2013, unallocated corporate included $16 million of stock compensation, $6 million related to the non-service cost portion of pension expense, $2 million related to acquisition/divestiture activities, and $2 million of contributions to the Company’s charitable foundation. In 2012, acquisition/divestiture expense totaled $16 million, stock compensation totaled $12 million, the non-service portion of pension expense was $8 million and contributions to the Company’s charitable foundation totaled $2 million.

Financial Condition and Cash Flow

Working Capital. The following table highlights several key measures of asset performance (dollars in millions):

In 2013, the Company’s financial condition was strong. Cash flows from operations were $243 million, a 28 percent increase over 2012. Changes in receivables and inventories increased in line with volume growth. Primary uses of cash included net payments on long-term debt of $148 million, share repurchases of $68 million, dividends of $61 million, capital expenditures of $23 million and business acquisitions of $12 million.

Cash flows from operations totaled $190 million in 2012. Changes in receivables and inventories moderated during 2012 after increasing in 2011. Primary uses of cash included investments in businesses held separately of $427 million, business acquisitions of $240 million, payments on long-term lines of credit of $393 million, capital expenditures of $18 million and dividends of $54 million.

Capital Structure. At December 27, 2013, the Company’s capital structure included current notes payable of $10 million, long-term debt of $408 million and shareholders’ equity of $634 million. At December 28, 2012, the Company’s capital structure included current notes payable of $8 million, long-term debt of $556 million and shareholders’ equity of $454 million.

Shareholders’ equity increased by $180 million in 2013. The key components of changes in shareholders’ equity include current year earnings of $211 million, reduced by $70 million of shares repurchased and $63 million of dividends declared, and increased by $42 million for shares issued and increases in other comprehensive income due mainly to pension and post-retirement medical liability adjustments.

Liquidity and Capital Resources . The Company had cash totaling $20 million at December 27, 2013 and $31 million at December 28, 2012, held in deposit accounts.

There were no changes to the Company’s credit agreements during 2013. On March 27, 2012, the Company’s $250 million credit agreement was terminated in connection with the execution of a new unsecured revolving credit agreement. The current credit agreement is with a syndicate of lenders and expires in March 2017. It provides up to $450 million of committed credit,

23

Table of Contents

available for general corporate purposes, working capital needs, share repurchases and acquisitions. The Company may borrow up to $50 million under the swingline portion of the facility for daily working capital needs.

Under terms of the revolving credit agreement, loans denominated in U.S. dollars bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either a base rate or a LIBOR-based rate. Loans denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars bear interest at a LIBOR-based rate. The base rate is an annual rate equal to a margin ranging from zero percent to 1 percent, depending on the Company’s cash flow leverage ratio (debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and extraordinary non-operating or non-cash charges and expenses) plus the highest of (i) the bank’s prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5 percent or (iii) one-month LIBOR plus 1.5 percent. In general, LIBOR-based loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 1 percent to 2 percent, depending on the Company’s cash flow leverage ratio. The Company is also required to pay a fee on the undrawn amount of the loan commitment at an annual rate ranging from 0.15 percent to 0.40 percent, depending on the Company’s cash flow leverage ratio.

The agreement requires the Company to maintain certain financial ratios as to cash flow leverage and interest coverage. The Company is in compliance with all financial covenants of its debt agreements.

On April 2, 2012, the Company paid $660 million to complete the Finishing Brands acquisition, using available cash and $350 million of borrowings on the new credit agreement. In July 2012, the Company made an additional payment of $8 million, representing the difference between cash balances acquired and the amount estimated at the time of closing. Assets acquired in the acquisition included $18 million of cash, of which $6 million was available to Powder Finishing operations.

In May 2012, the FTC issued a proposed decision and order which requires Graco to sell the Liquid Finishing business assets, including Liquid Finishing business activities related to the development, manufacture, and sale of products under the Binks, DeVilbiss, Ransburg and BGK brand names, no later than 180 days from the date the order becomes final. The FTC has not yet issued its final decision and order. The Company has retained the services of an investment bank to help it market the Liquid Finishing businesses and identify potential buyers. The Company believes its investment in the Liquid Finishing businesses, carried at a cost of $422 million, is not impaired.

Under terms of the FTC’s hold separate order, the Company is required to provide sufficient resources to maintain the viability, competitiveness and marketability of the Liquid Finishing businesses, including general funds, capital, working capital and reimbursement of losses. To the extent that the Liquid Finishing businesses generate funds in excess of financial resources needed, the Company has access to such funds consistent with practices in place prior to the acquisition. During 2013 and 2012, the Company received a total of $28 million and $12 million, respectively, of dividends from current earnings of the Liquid Finishing businesses.

On December 27, 2013, the Company had $502 million in lines of credit, of which $355 million was unused. Internally generated funds and unused financing sources are expected to provide the Company with the flexibility to meet its liquidity needs in 2014, including its capital expenditure plan of approximately $25-30 million, planned dividends (estimated at $67 million) and acquisitions. If acquisition opportunities increase, the Company believes that reasonable financing alternatives are available for the Company to execute on those opportunities.

In December 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors increased the Company’s regular common dividend from an annual rate of $1.00 to $1.10 per share, a 10 percent increase.

Cash Flow. A summary of cash flow follows (in millions):

Cash Flows From Operating Activities . Net cash provided by operating activities was $243 million in 2013 and $190 million in 2012. During 2013, changes in receivables and inventories increased in line with volume growth. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 was driven by net income of $211 million and adjustments for depreciation and amortization and share-based compensation.

24

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by operating activities was $190 million in 2012 and $162 million in 2011. During 2012, changes in receivables and inventories moderated after increasing in 2011.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities. During 2013, cash used in investing activities was $31 million compared to $695 million in 2012. During 2013, cash outflows consisted of $23 million of additions to property, plant and equipment, and business acquisitions of $12 million. During 2012, cash outflows included an investment in businesses held separate of $427 million, business acquisitions of $240 million and $18 million of additions of property, plant and equipment.

Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities . During 2013, cash used in financing activities was $226 million. Net payments on outstanding lines of credit were $148 million, share repurchases totaled $68 million and cash dividends paid were $61 million in 2013. These cash uses were offset by the issuance of stock of $42 million. During 2012, cash provided by financing activities was $233 million. We used $350 million of borrowings on a $450 million revolving credit facility to fund business acquisitions and investments. Net payments on outstanding lines of credit, subsequent to the acquisition transaction, were $94 million in 2012 and cash dividends paid totaled $54 million.

In September 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to 6 million shares of its outstanding stock, primarily through open-market transactions. This authorization will expire on September 30, 2015. Under the current authorization, 5 million shares remain available for purchase as of December 27, 2013.

The Company repurchased and retired nearly 1 million shares at a cost of $68 million in 2013. We made $1 million and $43 million of share repurchases in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Share repurchases will continue in 2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations . As of December 27, 2013, the Company is obligated to make cash payments in connection with its long-term debt, operating leases and purchase obligations in the amounts listed below. The Company has no significant off-balance sheet debt or other unrecorded obligations other than the items noted in the following table. In addition to the commitments noted in the following table, the Company could be obligated to perform under standby letters of credit totaling $3 million at December 27, 2013. The Company has also guaranteed the debt of its subsidiaries up to $10 million. All debt of subsidiaries is reflected in the consolidated balance sheets.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The Company’s most significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note A to the consolidated financial statements. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in conformity with U.S. GAAP, requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual amounts will differ from those estimates. The Company considers the following policies to involve the most judgment in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Excess and Discontinued Inventory . The Company’s inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Reserves for excess and discontinued products are estimated. The amount of the reserve is determined based on projected sales information, plans for discontinued products and other factors. Though management considers these balances adequate, changes in sales volumes due to unanticipated economic or competitive conditions are among the factors that would result in materially different amounts for this item.

25

Table of Contents

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The Company performs impairment testing for goodwill and other intangible assets annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. For goodwill, the Company performs impairment reviews for the Company’s reporting units using a fair-value method based on management’s judgments and assumptions. The Company estimates the fair value of the reporting units by an allocation of market capitalization value, cross-checked by a present value of future cash flows calculation. The estimated fair value is then compared with the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including recorded goodwill. Based on our most recent goodwill impairment assessment performed during the fourth quarter of 2013, the fair value of each reporting unit significantly exceeded its carrying value. Accordingly, step two of the impairment analysis was not required.

The Company also performs a separate impairment test for each other intangible asset with indefinite life, based on estimated future use and discounting estimated future cash flows. A considerable amount of management judgment and assumptions are required in performing the impairment tests. Though management considers its judgments and assumptions to be reasonable, changes in economic or market conditions, product offerings or marketing strategies could change the estimated fair values and result in impairment charges.

Product Warranty. A liability is established for estimated warranty claims to be paid in the future that relate to current and prior period sales. The Company estimates these costs based on historical claim experience, changes in warranty programs and other factors, including evaluating specific product warranty issues. The establishment of reserves requires the use of judgment and assumptions regarding the potential for losses relating to warranty issues. Though management considers these balances adequate, changes in the Company’s warranty policy or a significant change in product defects versus historical averages are among the factors that would result in materially different amounts for this item.

Income Taxes. In the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, management calculates income taxes. This includes estimating current tax liability as well as assessing temporary differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and financial statement purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on the balance sheet using statutory rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. These assets and liabilities are analyzed regularly and management assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recoverable from future taxable income. A valuation allowance is established to the extent that management believes that recovery is not likely. Liabilities for uncertain tax positions are also established for potential and ongoing audits of federal, state and international issues. The Company routinely monitors the potential impact of such situations and believes that liabilities are properly stated. Valuations related to amounts owed and tax rates could be impacted by changes to tax codes, changes in statutory rates, the Company’s future taxable income levels and the results of tax audits.

Retirement Obligations. The measurements of the Company’s pension and postretirement medical obligations are dependent on a number of assumptions including estimates of the present value of projected future payments, taking into consideration future events such as salary increase and demographic experience. These assumptions may have an impact on the expense and timing of future contributions.

The assumptions used in developing the required estimates for pension obligations include discount rate, inflation, salary increases, retirement rates, expected return on plan assets and mortality rates. The assumptions used in developing the required estimates for postretirement medical obligations include discount rates, rate of future increase in medical costs and participation rates.

For U.S. plans, the Company establishes its discount rate assumption by reference to a yield curve published by an actuary and projected plan cash flows. For plans outside the U.S., the Company establishes a rate by country by reference to highly rated corporate bonds. These reference points have been determined to adequately match expected plan cash flows. The Company bases its inflation assumption on an evaluation of external market indicators. The salary assumptions are based on actual historical experience, the near-term outlook and assumed inflation. Retirement rates are based on experience. The investment return assumption is based on the expected long-term performance of plan assets. In setting this number, the Company considers the input of actuaries and investment advisors, its long-term historical returns, the allocation of plan assets and projected returns on plan assets. The Company maintained its investment return assumption for its U.S. plan at 8.5 percent for 2014 and set the return assumption for its Swiss plan at 2.0 percent. Mortality rates are based on a common group mortality table for males and females.

26

Table of Contents

Net pension cost in 2013 was $14 million and was allocated to cost of products sold and operating expenses based on salaries and wages. At December 27, 2013, a one-half percentage point decrease in the indicated assumptions would have the following effects (in millions):

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The accounting standards updates issued by The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) that will be effective for the Company in 2014 will not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company sells and purchases products and services in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and pays variable interest rates on borrowings under certain credit facilities. Consequently, the Company is subject to profitability risk arising from exchange and interest rate movements. The Company may use a variety of financial and derivative instruments to manage foreign currency and interest rate risks. The Company does not enter into any of these instruments for trading purposes to generate revenue. Rather, the Company’s objective in managing these risks is to reduce fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange and interest rates.

The Company may use forward exchange contracts, options and other hedging activities to hedge the U.S. dollar value resulting from anticipated currency transactions and net monetary asset and liability positions. At December 27, 2013, the currencies to which the Company had the most significant balance sheet exchange rate exposure were the euro, Swiss franc, Canadian dollar, British pound, Japanese yen, Australian dollar, Chinese yuan renminbi and South Korean won. It is not possible to determine the true impact of currency rate changes; however, the direct translation effect on net sales and net earnings can be estimated. Changes in translation rates had no significant effect on 2013 net sales or earnings. In 2012, the effect of the stronger U.S. dollar compared to other currencies (primarily the euro) resulted in a decrease in sales and net earnings of approximately $15 million and $5 million, respectively. In 2011, the calculated translation effect resulted in an increase in net sales and net earnings of approximately $17 million and $7 million, respectively.

2014 Outlook

We expect growth in every region of the world in 2014. In the Americas, the continued recovery in the construction market should provide a tailwind for both our Contractor and Industrial segments. Further, we expect the general economic environment for industrial manufacturing to remain stable in the United States through 2014. Although the economies of Western Europe are still struggling to find their footing, we expect growth from the emerging markets of Eastern Europe to drive moderate growth in the EMEA region in 2014. While our Asia Pacific region will continue to face weak economic conditions and difficult comparables into the first half of 2014, we are hopeful that the business will gain momentum as the year progresses. With a modest increase in volumes, we expect factory performance in 2014 to remain solid and continue to drive profitability. The Graco team is focused on executing our strategies for growth in 2014.

The Company’s backlog is typically small compared to annual sales and is not a good indicator of future business levels. In addition to economic growth, the successful launch of new products and expanded distribution coverage, the sales outlook is dependent on many factors, including realization of price increases and stable foreign currency exchange rates.

27

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

The Company desires to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions regarding forward-looking statements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is filing this Cautionary Statement in order to do so. From time to time various forms filed by our Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Form 10-K and our Form 10-Qs and Form 8-Ks, and other disclosures, including our 2013 Overview report, press releases, earnings releases, analyst briefings, conference calls and other written documents or oral statements released by our Company, may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally use words such as “expect,” “foresee,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “project,” “should,” “estimate,” “will,” and similar expressions, and reflect our Company’s expectations concerning the future. All forecasts and projections are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon currently available information, but various risks and uncertainties may cause our Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these statements in light of new information or future events.

Future results could differ materially from those expressed, due to the impact of changes in various factors. These risk factors include, but are not limited to: changes in laws and regulations; economic conditions in the United States and other major world economies; our Company’s growth strategies, which include making acquisitions, investing in new products, expanding geographically and targeting new industries; whether we are able to effectively complete a divestiture of the acquired Liquid Finishing businesses, which has not been completed and remains subject to FTC approval; political instability; new entrants who copy our products or infringe on our intellectual property; supply interruptions or delays; risks incident to conducting business internationally; the ability to meet our customers’ needs and changes in product demand; results of and costs associated with, litigation, administrative proceedings and regulatory reviews incident to our business; compliance with anti-corruption laws; the possibility of decline in purchases from few large customers of the Contractor segment; variations in activity in the construction and automotive industries; security breaches and natural disasters. Please refer to Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2013 for a more comprehensive discussion of these and other risk factors. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

Investors should realize that factors other than those identified above and in Item 1A might prove important to the Company’s future results. It is not possible for management to identify each and every factor that may have an impact on the Company’s operations in the future as new factors can develop from time to time.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2013. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992).

Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 27, 2013.

The Company’s independent auditors have issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. That report appears in this Form 10-K.

28

Table of Contents

REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Graco Inc.

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Graco Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 27, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 27, 2013, of the Company and our report dated February 18, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 18, 2014

29

Table of Contents

Consolidated Financial Statements

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Graco Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Graco Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 27, 2013 and December 28, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 27, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Graco Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 27, 2013 and December 28, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 27, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 18, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 18, 2014

30

Table of Contents

GRACO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In thousands except per share amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

(In thousands)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

31

Table of Contents

GRACO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)