GHI 10-Q Quarterly Report March 31, 2017 | Alphaminr
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP

GHI 10-Q Quarter ended March 31, 2017

GREYSTONE HOUSING IMPACT INVESTORS LP
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 atax-10q_20170331.htm ATAX-10Q-20170331 atax-10q_20170331.htm

Fa

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to

Commission File Number:  000-24843

AMERICA FIRST MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

47-0810385

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1004 Farnam Street, Suite 400

Omaha, Nebraska 68102

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(402) 444-1630

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non- accelerated filer

(do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES NO


INDEX

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Forward-Looking Statements

This report (including, but not limited to, the information contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”) contains forward-looking statements.  All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this report, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements.  When used, statements which are not historical in nature, including those containing words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  We have based forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.  This report also contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other industry data.  This data involves several assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates.  We have not independently verified the statistical and other industry data generated by independent parties which are contained in this report and, accordingly, we cannot guarantee their accuracy or completeness.

These forward-looking statements are subject, but not limited, to various risks and uncertainties, including those relating to:

current maturities of our financing arrangements and our ability to renew or refinance such financing arrangements;

defaults on the mortgage loans securing our mortgage revenue bonds (“MRBs”);

the competitive environment in which we operate;

risks associated with investing in multifamily, student, senior citizen residential and commercial properties, including changes in business conditions and the general economy;

the general level of interest rates;

our ability to use borrowings to finance our assets;

local, regional, national and international economic and credit market conditions;

recapture of previously issued Low Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTCs”) in accordance with Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code;

changes in the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Capital Fund Program (“HUD”);

appropriations risk related to funding of Federal housing programs, including HUD Section 8; and

changes in the U.S. corporate tax code and other government regulations affecting our business.

Other risks, uncertainties and factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements we make. We are not obligated to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the industry in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described under the headings “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of America First Multifamily Investors, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

All references to “we,” “us,” and the “Partnership” in this document mean America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. (“ATAX”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. See Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, of the Partnership’s report for additional details.


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

AMERICA FIRST MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS, L.P.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

March 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Unaudited

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$

22,778,461

$

20,748,521

Restricted cash

5,911,527

6,757,699

Interest receivable, net

7,273,689

6,983,203

Mortgage revenue bonds held in trust, at fair value (Note  6)

731,091,380

590,194,179

Mortgage revenue bonds, at fair value (Note 6)

27,814,516

90,016,872

Public housing capital fund trusts, at fair value (Note 7)

55,851,799

57,158,068

Real estate assets: (Note 8)

Land and improvements

13,626,868

17,354,587

Buildings and improvements

105,088,950

113,089,041

Real estate assets before accumulated depreciation

118,715,818

130,443,628

Accumulated depreciation

(15,101,930

)

(16,217,028

)

Net real estate assets

103,613,888

114,226,600

Investment in unconsolidated entities (Note 9)

29,584,325

19,470,006

Property loans, net of loan loss allowance (Note 10)

30,964,833

29,763,334

Other assets (Note 12)

8,647,287

8,795,192

Total Assets

$

1,023,531,705

$

944,113,674

Liabilities

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

$

7,871,698

$

7,255,327

Income taxes payable

2,600,047

-

Distribution payable

8,678,628

8,017,950

Unsecured lines of credit (Note 13)

-

40,000,000

Secured line of credit, net (Note 14)

-

19,816,667

Debt financing, net (Note 15)

598,123,706

495,383,033

Mortgages payable and other secured financing, net (Note 16)

51,175,060

51,379,512

Derivative swaps, at fair value (Note 17)

1,228,758

1,339,283

Total Liabilities

669,677,897

623,191,772

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 18)

Redeemable Series A preferred units, approximately $57.0 and $40.9 million redemption value,

10.0 million authorized, 5.7 million and 4.1 million issued and outstanding, respectively (Note 19)

56,890,218

40,788,034

Partnersʼ Capital

General Partner (Note 1)

296,318

102,536

Beneficial Unit Certificate holders

296,667,272

280,026,669

Total Partnersʼ Capital

296,963,590

280,129,205

Noncontrolling interest

-

4,663

Total Capital

296,963,590

280,133,868

Total Liabilities and Partnersʼ Capital

$

1,023,531,705

$

944,113,674

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


AMERICA FIRST MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS, L.P.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

Revenues:

Property revenues

$

3,729,778

$

5,074,104

Investment income

11,470,186

9,157,234

Contingent interest income

132,650

174,396

Other interest income

645,137

514,125

Other income

62,637

-

Total revenues

16,040,388

14,919,859

Expenses:

Real estate operating (exclusive of items shown below)

2,484,216

2,636,677

Depreciation and amortization

1,592,826

2,124,898

Amortization of deferred financing costs

740,238

532,187

Interest expense

5,442,253

4,770,135

General and administrative

3,130,880

2,332,371

Total expenses

13,390,413

12,396,268

Other Income:

Gain on sale of MF Properties

7,168,587

-

Gain on sale of securities

-

8,097

Income before income taxes

9,818,562

2,531,688

Income tax expense

2,458,047

-

Net income

7,360,515

2,531,688

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

71,653

(12

)

Partnership net income

7,288,862

2,531,700

Redeemable Series A preferred unit distributions and accretion

(324,642

)

(1,684

)

Net income available to Partners

$

6,964,220

$

2,530,016

Net income (loss) available to Partners and noncontrolling interest allocated to:

General Partner

$

1,147,072

$

67,155

Limited Partners - Unitholders

5,794,702

2,462,861

Limited Partners - Restricted Unitholders

22,446

-

Noncontrolling interest

71,653

(12

)

$

7,035,873

$

2,530,004

Unitholdersʼ interest in net income per unit (basic and diluted):

Net income per unit, basic and diluted

$

0.10

$

0.04

Distributions declared, per unit

$

0.125

$

0.125

Weighted average number of units outstanding, basic

60,037,687

60,252,928

Weighted average number of units outstanding, diluted

60,037,687

60,252,928

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


AMERICA FIRST MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS, L.P.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

Net income

$

7,360,515

$

2,531,688

Reversal of net unrealized gain on sale of securities

-

(236,439

)

Unrealized gain on securities

18,980,366

12,337,427

Unrealized gain on bond purchase commitments

220,944

1,587,813

Comprehensive income

26,561,825

16,220,489

Comprehensive income (loss) allocated to noncontrolling interest

71,653

(12

)

Partnership comprehensive income

$

26,490,172

$

16,220,501

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


AMERICA FIRST MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS, L.P.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017 and 2016

(UNAUDITED)

General Partner

# of Units - Restricted and Unrestricted

Beneficial Unit

Certificate Holders - Restricted and Unrestricted

Non-controlling

Interest

Total

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Income (Loss)

Balance at December 31, 2016

$

102,536

60,224,538

$

280,026,669

$

4,663

$

280,133,868

$

38,895,484

Distribution to noncontrolling

interest

-

-

(76,316

)

(76,316

)

Distributions paid or accrued

Regular distribution

(42,610

)

(4,218,413

)

-

(4,261,023

)

-

Distribution of Tier 2

earnings (Note 3)

(1,104,401

)

(3,313,203

)

-

(4,417,604

)

-

Net income (loss) allocable to

Partners

1,147,072

5,817,148

71,653

7,035,873

-

Repurchase of Beneficial Unit

Certificates

-

(144,748

)

(823,358

)

-

(823,358

)

-

Restricted units awarded

-

173,138

-

-

-

-

Restricted units compensation

expense

1,708

-

169,132

-

170,840

-

Unrealized gain on securities

189,804

-

18,790,562

-

18,980,366

18,980,366

Unrealized gain on bond

purchase commitment

2,209

-

218,735

-

220,944

220,944

Balance at March 31, 2017

$

296,318

60,252,928

$

296,667,272

$

-

$

296,963,590

$

58,096,794

General Partner

# of Units

Beneficial Unit

Certificate Holders

Non-controlling

Interest

Total

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Income (Loss)

Balance at December 31, 2015

$

399,077

60,252,928

$

312,720,264

$

5,486

$

313,124,827

$

60,963,687

Reversal of net unrealized

gain sale of securities

(2,364

)

(234,075

)

(236,439

)

(236,439

)

Distributions paid or

accrued

(76,077

)

(7,531,616

)

-

(7,607,693

)

-

Net income (loss) allocated to

Partners and noncontrolling

interests:

Redeemable Series A

Preferred Unit distribution

accrued and accretion

(17

)

(1,667

)

-

(1,684

)

-

Net income (loss)

67,172

2,464,528

(12

)

2,531,688

-

Unrealized gain on

securities

123,374

12,214,053

-

12,337,427

12,337,427

Unrealized gain on bond

purchase commitment

15,878

1,571,935

-

1,587,813

1,587,813

Balance at March 31, 2016

$

527,043

60,252,928

$

321,203,422

$

5,474

$

321,735,939

$

74,652,488

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


AMERICA FIRST MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS, L.P.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income

$

7,360,515

$

2,531,688

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization expense

1,592,826

2,124,898

Gain on sale of MF Property

(7,168,587

)

-

Gain on sale of securities

-

(8,097

)

Non-cash loss on derivatives

121,349

1,110,407

Restricted unit compensation expense

170,840

-

Bond premium/discount amortization

(35,767

)

(33,573

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

740,238

532,187

Deferred income tax expense & income tax payable

2,458,047

-

Change in preferred return receivable from unconsolidated entities

(581,772

)

-

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions

Increase in interest receivable

(290,486

)

(793,661

)

(Increase) decrease in other assets

(97,700

)

(354,030

)

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses

612,007

(244,234

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

4,881,510

4,865,585

Cash flows from investing activities:

Capital expenditures

(112,629

)

(157,084

)

Proceeds from sale of MF Properties

13,750,000

-

Proceeds from sale of mortgage revenue bond

-

9,295,000

Proceeds from the sale of MBS Securities

-

14,997,069

Acquisition of mortgage revenue bonds

(59,585,000

)

(11,500,000

)

Contributions to unconsolidated entities

(6,412,262

)

(2,442,846

)

Restricted cash - debt collateral paid

(32,966

)

(750,000

)

Restricted cash - debt collateral released

514,903

812,196

Decrease in restricted cash

364,235

134,615

Principal payments received on mortgage revenue bonds

1,114,063

1,523,757

Principal payments received on taxable bonds

3,888

-

Advances on property loans

(1,701,499

)

(5,836,758

)

Principal payments received on property loans

500,000

8,516

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

(51,597,267

)

6,084,465

Cash flows from financing activities:

Distributions paid

(8,289,468

)

(8,759,343

)

Proceeds from the sale of redeemable Series A Preferred Units

16,131,000

10,000,000

Payment of offering costs related to the sale of redeemable Series A Preferred Units

-

(19,052

)

Repurchase of beneficial unit certificates

(823,358

)

-

Payment of tax withholding related to restricted unit awards

(153,306

)

-

Distribution to noncontrolling interest

(76,316

)

-

Proceeds from debt financing

135,100,000

-

Principal payments on debt financing

(31,593,250

)

(21,600,363

)

Principal payments on mortgages payable

(233,630

)

(234,752

)

Principal borrowing on unsecured lines of credit

22,460,000

15,487,639

Principal payments on unsecured and secured lines of credit

(82,460,000

)

(5,000,000

)

Increase (decrease) in security deposit liability related to restricted cash

(100,762

)

62,399

Debt financing and other deferred costs

(1,215,213

)

(99,907

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

48,745,697

(10,163,379

)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

2,029,940

786,671

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

20,748,521

17,035,782

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

22,778,461

$

17,822,453

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for interest

$

4,907,078

$

3,646,802

Supplemental disclosure of non cash investing and financing activities:

Distributions declared but not paid for beneficial unit certificates and general partner

$

8,678,628

$

7,607,693

Distributions declared but not paid for Series A Preferred Units

$

320,823

$

1,667

Land contributed as investment in an unconsolidated entity

$

3,091,023

$

-

Capital expenditures financed through accounts payable

$

33,072

$

17,360

Deferred financing costs financed through accounts payable

$

46,764

$

-

Other assets financed through accounts payable

$

40,000

$

-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


AMERICA FIRST MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

1. Basis of Presentation

General

America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. (the “Partnership”) was formed on April 2, 1998, under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act for the purpose of acquiring, holding, selling and otherwise dealing with a portfolio of mortgage revenue bonds (“MRBs”) which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for affordable multifamily and student housing residential properties (collectively “Residential Properties”) and commercial properties. In addition, the Partnership may acquire interests in multifamily, student, and senior citizen residential properties (“MF Properties”) in order to position itself for future investments in MRBs issued to finance these properties or to operate the MF Property until its “highest and best use” can be determined by management.

The general partner of the Partnership is America First Capital Associates Limited Partnership Two (“AFCA 2” or “General Partner”).  The general partner of AFCA 2 is Burlington Capital LLC (“Burlington”). The Partnership has issued Beneficial Unit Certificates (“BUCs”) representing assigned limited partner interests to investors (“Unitholders”). The Partnership has also issued non-cumulative, non-voting and non-convertible Series A Preferred Units which represent limited partnership interests in the Partnership.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Consolidation

The “Partnership,” as used herein, includes America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The “wholly-owned subsidiaries” include the MF Properties owned by a limited partnership in which one of the wholly-owned subsidiaries (“the Greens Hold Co”) holds a 99% limited partner interest. All intercompany transactions are eliminated.  At March 31, 2017, the consolidated subsidiaries of the Partnership (the “Consolidated Subsidiaries”) consist of:

ATAX TEBS I, LLC, a special purpose entity owned and controlled by the Partnership, created to hold MRBs to facilitate the Tax Exempt Bond Securitization (“TEBS”) Financing (“M24 TEBS Financing”) with Freddie Mac.

ATAX TEBS II, LLC, a special purpose entity owned and controlled by the Partnership, created to hold MRBs to facilitate the second TEBS Financing, (“M31 TEBS Financing”) with Freddie Mac.

ATAX TEBS III, LLC, a special purpose entity owned and controlled by the Partnership, created to hold MRBs to facilitate the third TEBS Financing (“M33 TEBS Financing”), with Freddie Mac.

ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, committed to loan money or provide equity for the development of multifamily properties.

Six MF Properties which are either owned by the Partnership or subsidiaries of the Partnership.

Investment in unconsolidated entities

The Partnership makes initial investments in and is committed to invest, through ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, in certain limited liability companies (“Vantage Properties”). ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC holds a limited membership interest in the Vantage Properties. The investments will be used to construct multifamily properties. The Partnership does not have a controlling interest in the Vantage Properties and accounts for its limited partnership interests using the equity method of accounting.  The Partnership earns a return on its investment accruing immediately on its contributed capital which is guaranteed during the construction phase of the multifamily properties by an unrelated third party.  Due to the guarantee provided during the construction phase, cash flows are expected to be sufficient to make the payments. As a result, the Partnership records the return on the investment earned by the Partnership as investment income in the Partnership’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes

No provision has been made for income taxes because the Unitholders are required to report their share of the Partnership’s taxable income for federal and state income tax purposes, except for certain entities described below.

7


The Greens Hold Co, a wholly- owned subsidiary of the Partnership, is a corporation subject to federal and state income taxes .  The Partnership will recognize income tax expense or benefit for the federal and state income taxes incurred by the entity on the Partnership’s condensed cons olidated financial statements .

The Partnership evaluates its tax positions taken in the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements under the interpretation for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. As such, the Partnership may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if the Partnership believes it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities. The Partnership accrues interest and penalties as incurred within income tax expense.

Deferred income tax expense, or benefit, is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences (items that are treated differently for tax purposes than for financial reporting purposes) and the utilization of tax net operating losses (“NOL”) generated in prior years that had been previously recognized as deferred income tax assets. The Partnership provides for a valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets if it believes all, or some portion, of the deferred income tax asset may not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances that causes a change in the estimated ability to realize the related deferred income tax asset is included in deferred tax expense.

Restricted Unit Awards (“RUAs”)

The Partnership’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), as approved by the Unitholders in September 2015, permits the grant of Restricted Units and other awards to the employees of Burlington, the Partnership, or any affiliate of either, and members of Burlington’s Board of Managers for up to 3.0 million BUCs.  RUAs are generally granted with vesting conditions ranging from three months to three years. RUAs currently provide for the payment of quarterly distributions during the restriction period. The RUAs provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control or upon death or disability of the Participant. The Partnership accounts for forfeitures when they occur.

The fair value of each RUA is estimated on the grant date based on the Partnership’s exchange-listed closing price of the BUCs. The Partnership recognizes compensation expense for the RUAs on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period.

Estimates and assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. These condensed consolidated financial statements and notes have been prepared consistently with the 2016 Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position at March 31, 2017, and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been made. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016, was derived from audited annual financial statements, but does not contain all the footnote disclosures from the annual financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-05. The ASU eliminates guidance specific to real estate sales in Accounting Standards Codification 360-20. As such, sales and partial sales of real estate assets will now be subject to the same derecognition model as all other nonfinancial assets. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The effective date of this guidance coincides with revenue recognition guidance. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

8


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations; Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” The ASU modifies the requirements to meet the definition of a business unde r Topic 805, “Business Combinations.” The amendments provide a screen to determine when a set of identifiable assets and liabilities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. The impact is expected to result in fewer transactions being accounted for as business combinations. The ASU is effective for the Partne rship for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and is applied prospectively. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements; however, it is expected that the new stand ard would reduce the number of future real estate acquisitions that will be accounted for as business combinations and, therefore, reduce the amount of acquisition costs that will be expensed.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows; Restricted Cash.” The ASU requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for the Partnership’s annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and is applied retrospectively. The Partnership has not elected early adoption as of March 31, 2017 and is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230).” The ASU clarifies the presentation of cash receipts and cash payments related to certain transactions. The ASU is effective for the Partnership for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and is applied retrospectively. The Partnership has not elected early adoption as of March 31, 2017 and is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this pronouncement on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326).” The ASU enhances the methodology of measuring expected credit losses to include the use of forward-looking information to better inform credit loss estimates. The ASU is effective for the Partnership’s annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and is applied under a modified-retrospective approach. The Partnership is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this pronouncement on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” The ASU requires the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. The ASU offers specific accounting guidance for embedded lease arrangements, lease terms and incentives, sale-leaseback agreements, and related disclosures. The ASU is effective for the Partnership’s annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires a modified retrospective adoption, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership has performed a preliminary assessment of its lessor and lessee leasing arrangements. Lessor arrangements with tenants at the MF Properties are not expected to be materially impacted by adoption of the standard as substantially all leases are for terms of 12 months or less. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic 825-10).” The ASU simplifies and clarifies the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The ASU is effective for the Partnership’s annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Partnership is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The updated standard is a new comprehensive revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner that depicts the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. During 2016, the FASB issued ASU Nos. 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2016-20 that provide additional guidance related to the identification of performance obligations within a contract, assessing collectability, contract costs, and other technical corrections and improvements. ASU 2014-09 will become effective for the Partnership for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods within the annual period. ASU 2014-09 allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption. The Partnership has not selected a transition method. The Partnership has completed an evaluation of its revenue-producing contracts and determined they are primarily leases and investment agreements that are not within the scope of this standard. As a result, the Partnership does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact to the Partnership’s reported property revenues, investment income and other interest income. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate the impact on other revenue and income sources.

9


3. Partnership Income, Expenses and Cash Distributions

The Partnership’s Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the “Amended and Restated LP Agreement”) contains provisions for the distribution of Net Interest Income, Net Residual Proceeds and Liquidation Proceeds, for the allocation of income or loss from operations and for the allocation of income and loss arising from a repayment, sale, or liquidation of investments.  Income and losses will be allocated to each Unitholder on a periodic basis, as determined by the General Partner, based on the number of BUCs held by each Unitholder as of the last day of the period for which such allocation is to be made. Distributions of Net Interest Income and Net Residual Proceeds will be made to each Unitholder of record on the last day of each distribution period based on the number of BUCs held by each Unitholder on that date. For purposes of the Amended and Restated LP Agreement, cash distributions, if any, received by the Partnership from its investment in MF Properties will be included in the Partnership’s Net Interest Income and cash distributions received by the Partnership from the sale of such properties will be included in the Partnership’s Net Residual Proceeds.

Series A Preferred Units were created pursuant to the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated LP Agreement (the “First Amendment”), which became effective on March 30, 2016. The holders of the Series A Preferred Units are entitled to distributions at a fixed rate prior to payment of distributions to other Unitholders.

Cash distributions are currently made on a quarterly basis. AFCA 2 can elect to make distributions on a monthly or semi-annual basis. On each distribution date, Net Interest Income is distributed 99% to the limited partners and Unitholders as a class and 1% to AFCA 2 and Net Residual Proceeds are distributed 100% to the limited partners and Unitholders as a class, except that Net Interest Income and Net Residual Proceeds representing contingent interest in an amount equal to 0.9% per annum of the principal amount of the MRBs on a cumulative basis (defined as Net Interest Income (Tier 2) and Net Residual Proceeds (Tier 2), respectively) are distributed 75% to the limited partners and Unitholders as a class and 25% to AFCA 2.

4. Net income per BUC

The Partnership has disclosed basic and diluted net income per BUC on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The unvested RUAs issued under the Plan are considered participating securities. The Partnership uses the two-class method to allocate net income available to BUCs and the unvested Restricted Units. Unvested Restricted Units are included with BUCs for the calculation of diluted net income per BUC using the treasury stock method, if the treasury stock method is more dilutive than the two-class method. There were no dilutive units for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

5. Variable Interest Entities

Consolidated Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”)

The Partnership determined the TOB Trusts, Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings are VIEs and the Partnership is the primary beneficiary.  As such, the Partnership reports the TOB Trusts, Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings on a consolidated basis. The Partnership reports the senior floating-rate participation interests (“SPEARS”) related to the TOB Trusts and the Class A Certificates for both the Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings as secured debt financings on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The MRBs secured by the TOB Trusts, Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings are reported as assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. In determining the primary beneficiary of these specific VIEs, the Partnership considered which party has the power to control the activities of the VIEs which most significantly impact their financial performance, the risks that the entity was designed to create, and how each risk affects the VIE.  The executed agreements related to the TOB Trusts, Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings stipulate the Partnership has the sole right to cause the Trusts to sell the underlying assets. If they were sold, the extent to which the VIEs will be exposed to gains or losses would result from decisions made by the Partnership.

Non-Consolidated VIEs

The Partnership has variable interests in certain entities that are the borrowers on the Partnership’s MRBs and/or property loans. The Partnership has no equity ownership interest in the entities, but the MRBs and property loans issued by the Partnership are considered variable interests. In addition, the Partnership’s investments in unconsolidated entities are considered variable interests. The Partnership does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of such VIEs. As a result, the Partnership is not considered the primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the financial statements of these entities in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

10


The Partnership held variable inter ests in 21 and 20 non-consolidated VIEs at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The following table summarizes information regarding the Partnership’s variable interests in these entities at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Maximum Exposure to Loss

March 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Mortgage revenue bonds

$

137,871,000

$

137,921,000

Property loans

16,857,297

16,476,073

Investment in unconsolidated entities

29,584,325

19,470,006

$

184,312,622

$

173,867,079

The maximum exposure to loss for the MRBs is equal to the cost adjusted for paydowns at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The difference between a MRB’s carrying value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the maximum exposure to loss is a function of the unrealized gains or losses on the MRB.

The maximum exposure to loss on the property loans at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is equal to the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest. The difference between a property loans’ carrying value and the maximum exposure is the value of loan loss allowances that have been previously recorded against the property loans.

11


6 . Investments in Mortgage Revenue Bonds (“MRBs”)

MRBs owned by the Partnership have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for Residential Properties and commercial properties.  MRBs are either held directly by the Partnership or are held in trusts created in connection with debt financing transactions (Note 15). The Partnership had the following investments in MRBs at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

March 31, 2017

Description of Mortgage Revenue Bonds Held in Trust

State

Cost Adjusted for

Paydowns

Cumulative

Unrealized Gain

Cumulative

Unrealized Loss

Estimated Fair Value

Courtyard - Series A & B (2)

CA

$

16,458,000

$

110,929

$

-

$

16,568,929

Glenview Apartments - Series A (4)

CA

4,659,536

243,342

-

4,902,878

Harmony Court Bakersfield - Series A & B (2)

CA

5,727,000

32,990

-

5,759,990

Harmony Terrace - Series A & B (2)

CA

14,300,000

225,094

-

14,525,094

Harden Ranch - Series A (3)

CA

6,896,254

458,986

-

7,355,240

Las Palmas II - Series A & B (2)

CA

3,465,000

55,226

-

3,520,226

Montclair Apartments - Series A (4)

CA

2,524,331

182,019

-

2,706,350

San Vicente - Series A & B (2)

CA

5,320,000

-

(30,004

)

5,289,996

Santa Fe Apartments - Series A (4)

CA

3,058,132

298,645

-

3,356,777

Seasons at Simi Valley - Series A (2)

CA

4,376,000

373,438

-

4,749,438

Seasons Lakewood - Series A & B (2)

CA

12,610,000

162,961

-

12,772,961

Seasons San Juan Capistrano - Series A & B (2)

CA

18,949,000

-

(117,692

)

18,831,308

Summerhill - Series A & B (2)

CA

9,795,000

140,099

-

9,935,099

Sycamore Walk - Series A (2)

CA

3,632,000

185,900

-

3,817,900

The Village at Madera - Series A & B (2)

CA

4,804,000

-

(31,581

)

4,772,419

Tyler Park Townhomes - Series A (3)

CA

6,009,773

314,519

-

6,324,292

Westside Village Market - Series A (3)

CA

3,927,375

152,881

-

4,080,256

Lake Forest (1)

FL

8,606,000

1,010,956

-

9,616,956

Ashley Square (1)

IA

5,024,000

417,085

-

5,441,085

Brookstone (1)

IL

7,460,242

1,689,582

-

9,149,824

Copper Gate Apartments (3)

IN

5,145,000

597,695

-

5,742,695

Renaissance - Series A (4)

LA

11,321,742

1,657,217

-

12,978,959

Live 929 Apartments (2)

MD

40,656,400

4,474,464

-

45,130,864

Woodlynn Village (1)

MN

4,310,000

387,771

-

4,697,771

Greens Property - Series A (3)

NC

8,189,000

990,540

-

9,179,540

Silver Moon - Series A (4)

NM

7,920,141

626,949

-

8,547,090

Ohio Properties - Series A (1)

OH

14,191,000

2,605,877

-

16,796,877

Bridle Ridge (1)

SC

7,500,000

676,500

-

8,176,500

Columbia Gardens (2)

SC

15,211,629

-

(689,295

)

14,522,334

Companion at Thornhill Apartments (2)

SC

11,483,057

642,679

-

12,125,736

Cross Creek (1)

SC

6,126,494

2,774,745

-

8,901,239

The Palms at Premier Park Apartments (3)

SC

19,375,997

2,368,538

-

21,744,535

Willow Run (2)

SC

15,211,458

-

(682,914

)

14,528,544

Arbors at Hickory Ridge (3)

TN

11,432,508

1,100,249

-

12,532,757

Pro Nova 2014-1 (2)

TN

10,041,165

797,435

-

10,838,600

Avistar at Chase Hill - Series A (3)

TX

9,821,495

646,280

-

10,467,775

Avistar at Copperfield - Series A (2)

TX

10,000,000

981,390

-

10,981,390

Avistar at the Crest - Series A (3)

TX

9,526,850

747,812

-

10,274,662

Avistar at the Oaks - Series A (3)

TX

7,691,162

708,946

-

8,400,108

Avistar at the Parkway - Series A (4)

TX

13,300,000

912,068

-

14,212,068

Avistar at Wilcrest - Series A (2)

TX

3,775,000

288,734

-

4,063,734

Avistar at Wood Hollow - Series A (2)

TX

31,850,000

2,663,590

-

34,513,590

Avistar in 09 - Series A (3)

TX

6,641,021

482,819

-

7,123,840

Avistar on the Boulevard - Series A (3)

TX

16,230,017

1,590,214

-

17,820,231

Avistar on the Hills - Series A (3)

TX

5,313,805

420,499

-

5,734,304

Bella Vista (1)

TX

6,365,000

645,602

-

7,010,602

Bruton Apartments (2)

TX

18,135,889

2,262,691

-

20,398,580

Concord at Gulfgate - Series A (2)

TX

19,185,000

2,002,365

-

21,187,365

Concord at Little York - Series A (2)

TX

13,440,000

1,402,751

-

14,842,751

Concord at Williamcrest - Series A (2)

TX

20,820,000

1,953,644

-

22,773,644

Crossing at 1415 - Series A (2)

TX

7,590,000

91,901

-

7,681,901

Decatur Angle (2)

TX

22,912,234

1,541,021

-

24,453,255

Heights at 515 - Series A (2)

TX

6,435,000

362,774

-

6,797,774

12


Heritage Square - Series A (4)

TX

11,137,303

899,415

-

12,036,718

Oaks at Georgetown - Series A & B (2)

TX

17,842,000

-

(6,057

)

17,835,943

Runnymede (1)

TX

10,250,000

1,387,645

-

11,637,645

Southpark (1)

TX

11,770,930

3,605,964

-

15,376,894

Vantage at Harlingen - Series B (4)

TX

24,483,475

1,389,153

-

25,872,628

Vantage at Judson -Series B (4)

TX

26,304,679

2,175,003

-

28,479,682

15 West Apartments (2)

WA

9,840,735

1,352,502

-

11,193,237

Mortgage revenue bonds held in trust

$

676,378,829

$

56,270,094

$

(1,557,543

)

$

731,091,380

(1)

MRBs owned by ATAX TEBS I, LLC (M24 TEBS), Note 15

(2)

MRBs held by Deutsche Bank in a secured financing transaction, Note 15

(3)

MRBs owned by ATAX TEBS II, LLC (M31 TEBS), Note 15

(4)

MRBs owned by ATAX TEBS III, LLC (M33 TEBS), Note 15

March 31, 2017

Description of Mortgage Revenue Bonds held by the Partnership

State

Cost Adjusted for

Paydowns

Cumulative

Unrealized Gain

Cumulative

Unrealized Loss

Estimated Fair Value

Seasons at Simi Valley - Series B

CA

1,944,000

20,065

-

1,964,065

Sycamore Walk - Series B

CA

1,815,000

-

(17,134

)

1,797,866

Greens Property - Series B

NC

939,743

130,989

-

1,070,732

Ohio Properties - Series B

OH

3,546,470

505,116

-

4,051,586

Avistar at Chase Hill - Series B

TX

956,476

13,545

-

970,021

Avistar at Copperfield - Series B

TX

4,000,000

151,942

-

4,151,942

Avistar at the Crest - Series B

TX

752,296

76,170

-

828,466

Avistar at the Oaks - Series B

TX

550,200

56,026

-

606,226

Avistar at the Parkway - Series B

TX

125,000

6,657

-

131,657

Avistar at Wilcrest - Series B

TX

1,550,000

14,359

-

1,564,359

Avistar at Wood Hollow - Series B

TX

8,410,000

426,910

-

8,836,910

Avistar in 09 - Series B

TX

453,865

46,217

-

500,082

Avistar on the Boulevard - Series B

TX

447,016

45,261

-

492,277

Crossing at 1415 - Series B

TX

335,000

1,319

-

336,319

Heights at 515 - Series B

TX

510,000

2,008

-

512,008

Mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership

$

26,335,066

$

1,496,584

$

(17,134

)

$

27,814,516

13


December 31, 2016

Description of Mortgage Revenue Bonds Held in Trust

State

Cost Adjusted for

Paydowns

Cumulative

Unrealized Gain

Cumulative

Unrealized Loss

Estimated Fair Value

Glenview Apartments - Series A (4)

CA

$

4,670,000

$

132,402

$

-

$

4,802,402

Harmony Terrace - Series A & B (2)

CA

14,300,000

-

-

14,300,000

Harden Ranch - Series A (3)

CA

6,912,535

369,738

-

7,282,273

Montclair Apartments - Series A (4)

CA

2,530,000

108,608

-

2,638,608

Santa Fe Apartments - Series A (4)

CA

3,065,000

177,093

-

3,242,093

Seasons at Simi Valley - Series A (2)

CA

4,376,000

308,335

-

4,684,335

Sycamore Walk - Series A (2)

CA

3,632,000

130,431

-

3,762,431

Tyler Park Townhomes - Series A (3)

CA

6,024,120

237,582

-

6,261,702

Westside Village Market - Series A (3)

CA

3,936,750

102,641

-

4,039,391

Lake Forest (1)

FL

8,639,000

899,694

-

9,538,694

Ashley Square (1)

IA

5,039,000

338,556

-

5,377,556

Brookstone (1)

IL

7,462,678

1,457,340

-

8,920,018

Copper Gate Apartments (3)

IN

5,145,000

528,855

-

5,673,855

Renaissance - Series A (4)

LA

11,348,364

826,369

-

12,174,733

Live 929 Apartments (2)

MD

40,687,425

3,587,993

-

44,275,418

Woodlynn Village (1)

MN

4,310,000

294,976

-

4,604,976

Greens Property - Series A (3)

NC

8,210,000

844,585

-

9,054,585

Silver Moon - Series A (4)

NM

7,933,259

465,382

-

8,398,641

Ohio Properties - Series A (1)

OH

14,215,000

2,327,468

-

16,542,468

Bridle Ridge (1)

SC

7,535,000

517,881

-

8,052,881

Columbia Gardens (2)

SC

15,214,223

-

(927,030

)

14,287,193

Companion at Thornhill Apartments (2)

SC

11,500,000

645,552

-

12,145,552

Cross Creek (1)

SC

6,122,312

2,655,730

-

8,778,042

The Palms at Premier Park Apartments (3)

SC

19,826,716

1,784,386

-

21,611,102

Willow Run (2)

SC

15,214,085

-

(917,852

)

14,296,233

Arbors at Hickory Ridge (3)

TN

11,461,719

891,274

-

12,352,993

Pro Nova 2014-1 (2)

TN

10,041,924

685,576

-

10,727,500

Avistar at Chase Hill - Series A (3)

TX

9,844,994

589,023

-

10,434,017

Avistar at the Crest - Series A (3)

TX

9,549,644

753,267

-

10,302,911

Avistar at the Oaks - Series A (3)

TX

7,709,040

563,138

-

8,272,178

Avistar at the Parkway - Series A (4)

TX

13,300,000

-

(78,749

)

13,221,251

Avistar in 09 - Series A (3)

TX

6,656,458

359,562

-

7,016,020

Avistar on the Boulevard - Series A (3)

TX

16,268,850

1,283,272

-

17,552,122

Avistar on the Hills - Series A (3)

TX

5,326,157

423,496

-

5,749,653

Bella Vista (1)

TX

6,365,000

500,162

-

6,865,162

Bruton Apartments (2)

TX

18,145,000

349,886

-

18,494,886

Concord at Gulfgate - Series A (2)

TX

19,185,000

1,200,246

-

20,385,246

Concord at Little York - Series A (2)

TX

13,440,000

1,044,752

-

14,484,752

Concord at Williamcrest - Series A (2)

TX

20,820,000

1,302,534

-

22,122,534

Crossing at 1415 - Series A (2)

TX

7,590,000

-

(45,555

)

7,544,445

Decatur Angle (2)

TX

22,950,214

-

(290,985

)

22,659,229

Heights at 515 - Series A (2)

TX

6,435,000

-

(38,623

)

6,396,377

Heritage Square - Series A (4)

TX

11,161,330

905,455

-

12,066,785

Oaks at Georgetown - Series A & B (2)

TX

17,842,000

-

-

17,842,000

Runnymede (1)

TX

10,250,000

774,285

-

11,024,285

Southpark (1)

TX

11,751,861

3,286,203

-

15,038,064

Vantage at Harlingen - Series B (4)

TX

24,529,580

917,720

-

25,447,300

Vantage at Judson -Series B (4)

TX

26,356,498

1,658,508

-

28,015,006

15 West Apartments (2)

WA

9,850,000

1,584,281

-

11,434,281

Mortgage revenue bonds held in trust

$

554,678,736

$

37,814,237

$

(2,298,794

)

$

590,194,179

(1)

MRBs owned by ATAX TEBS I, LLC (M24 TEBS), Note 15

(2)

MRBs held by Deutsche Bank in a secured financing transaction, Note 15

(3)

MRBs owned by ATAX TEBS II, LLC (M31 TEBS), Note 15

(4)

MRBs owned by ATAX TEBS III, LLC (M33 TEBS), Note 15

14


December 31, 2016

Description of Mortgage Revenue Bonds held by the Partnership

State

Cost Adjusted for

Paydowns

Cumulative

Unrealized Gain

Cumulative

Unrealized Loss

Estimated Fair Value

Courtyard - Series A & B

CA

$

16,458,000

$

-

$

-

$

16,458,000

Harmony Court Bakersfield - Series A & B

CA

5,727,000

29,252

-

5,756,252

Las Palmas II - Series A & B

CA

3,465,000

15,139

-

3,480,139

San Vicente - Series A & B

CA

5,320,000

-

(30,019

)

5,289,981

Seasons at Simi Valley - Series B

CA

1,944,000

27,727

-

1,971,727

Seasons Lakewood - Series A & B

CA

12,610,000

-

-

12,610,000

Seasons San Juan Capistrano - Series A & B

CA

18,949,000

-

-

18,949,000

Summerhill - Series A & B

CA

9,795,000

-

(174,982

)

9,620,018

Sycamore Walk - Series B

CA

1,815,000

-

(64,432

)

1,750,568

The Village at Madera - Series A & B

CA

4,804,000

-

(84,437

)

4,719,563

Greens Property - Series B

NC

940,479

118,216

-

1,058,695

Ohio Properties - Series B

OH

3,549,780

449,068

-

3,998,848

Avistar at Chase Hill - Series B

TX

957,627

41,820

-

999,447

Avistar at the Crest - Series B

TX

753,201

64,228

-

817,429

Avistar at the Oaks - Series B

TX

550,836

47,231

-

598,067

Avistar at the Parkway - Series B

TX

125,000

-

(3,341

)

121,659

Avistar in 09 - Series B

TX

454,390

38,961

-

493,351

Avistar on the Boulevard - Series B

TX

447,554

38,165

-

485,719

Crossing at 1415 - Series B

TX

335,000

-

(2,614

)

332,386

Heights at 515 - Series B

TX

510,000

-

(3,977

)

506,023

Mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership

$

89,510,867

$

869,807

$

(363,802

)

$

90,016,872

See Note 22 for a description of the methodology and significant assumptions for determining the fair value of the MRBs. Unrealized gains or losses on the MRBs are recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) to reflect changes in their estimated fair values resulting from market conditions and fluctuations in the present value of the expected cash flows from the MRBs.

Bond Activity in the First Quarter of 2017

The following table includes the details of the MRB acquisitions during the three months ended March 31, 2017:

Property Name

Month

Acquired

Property Location

Units

Maturity Date

Base Interest Rate

Principal

Outstanding at Date

of Acquisition

Avistar at Copperfield - Series A

February

Houston, TX

192

5/1/2054

5.75

%

$

10,000,000

Avistar at Copperfield - Series B

February

Houston, TX

192

6/1/2054

12.00

%

4,000,000

Avistar at Wilcrest - Series A

February

Houston, TX

88

5/1/2054

5.75

%

3,775,000

Avistar at Wilcrest - Series B

February

Houston, TX

88

6/1/2054

12.00

%

1,550,000

Avistar at Wood Hollow - Series A

February

Austin, TX

409

5/1/2054

5.75

%

31,850,000

Avistar at Wood Hollow - Series B

February

Austin, TX

409

6/1/2054

12.00

%

8,410,000

$

59,585,000

Bond Activity in the First Quarter of 2016

In March 2016, the Partnership sold the Pro Nova 2014-2 bond for approximately $9.5 million, which approximated the MRB’s carrying value plus accrued interest. The Partnership used approximately $8.4 million of the proceeds from the sale to pay in full and collapse the TOB Trust securitizing this MRB (Note 15). The following table includes details of the MRB redeemed:

Property Name

Month

Exchanged

Property Location

Units

Maturity Date

Base Interest Rate

Principal

Outstanding at Date of Exchange

Pro Nova - 2014B 1

March

Knoxville, TN

-

5/1/2025

5.25

%

$

9,295,000

1 This is a commercial property. Accordingly, unit information is not applicable.

15


The following table includes the details of the MRB acquisitions during the three months ended March 31, 2016:

Property Name

Month

Acquired

Property Location

Units

Maturity Date

Base Interest Rate

Principal

Outstanding at Date

of Acquisition

Companion at Thornhill Apartments

January

Lexington, SC

178

1/1/2052

5.80

%

$

11,500,000

7. PHC Certificates

The Partnership owned 100% of the Residual Participation Receipts (“LIFERs”) in three tender option bond trusts (“PHC TOB Trusts”) that contain the PHC Certificates.  The assets held by the PHC Trusts consist of custodial receipts evidencing loans made to a number of local public housing authorities.  Principal and interest on these loans are payable by the respective public housing authorities out of annual appropriations to be made to the public housing authorities by HUD under HUD’s Capital Fund Program established under the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 (the “Capital Fund Program”).  The PHC Trusts have a first lien on these annual Capital Fund Program payments to secure the public housing authorities’ respective obligations to pay principal and interest on their loans.  The loans payable by the public housing authorities are not debts of, or guaranteed by, the United States of America or HUD.  Interest payable on the public housing authority debt held by the PHC Trusts is exempt from federal income taxes.  The PHC Certificates issued by each of the PHC Trusts have been rated investment grade by Standard & Poor’s.

The Partnership had the following investments in the PHC Certificates at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

March 31, 2017

Description of PHC Certificates

Weighted

Average Lives (Years)

Investment

Rating

Weighted

Average Interest

Rate Over Life

Cost Adjusted for

Paydowns

Cumulative

Unrealized Gain

Cumulative

Unrealized Loss

Estimated Fair

Value

PHC Certificate Trust I

8.06

AA-

5.31%

$

26,042,245

$

-

$

(570,800

)

$

25,471,445

PHC Certificate Trust II

7.40

A+

4.32%

10,608,479

-

(142,189

)

10,466,290

PHC Certificate Trust III

8.57

BBB

5.45%

20,132,750

-

(218,686

)

19,914,064

$

56,783,474

$

-

$

(931,675

)

$

55,851,799

December 31, 2016

Description of PHC Certificates

Weighted

Average Lives (Years)

Investment

Rating

Weighted

Average Interest

Rate Over Life

Cost Adjusted for

Paydowns

Cumulative

Unrealized Gain

Cumulative

Unrealized Loss

Estimated Fair

Value

PHC Certificate Trust I

8.31

AA-

5.36%

$

26,077,158

$

672,097

$

-

$

26,749,255

PHC Certificate Trust II

7.65

A+

4.31%

10,600,967

84,756

-

10,685,723

PHC Certificate Trust III

8.79

BBB

5.42%

20,122,937

-

(399,847

)

19,723,090

$

56,801,062

$

756,853

$

(399,847

)

$

57,158,068

See Note 22 for a description of the methodology and significant assumptions for determining the fair value of the PHC Certificates. Unrealized gains or losses on the PHC Certificates are recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) to reflect changes in their estimated fair values resulting from market conditions and fluctuations in the present value of the expected cash flows from the PHC Certificates .

16


8. Real Estate Assets

The following tables summarizes information regarding the Partnership’s real estate assets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Real Estate Assets at March 31, 2017

Property Name

Location

Number of

Units

Land and Land

Improvements

Buildings and

Improvements

Carrying Value on

March 31, 2017

Eagle Village

Evansville, IN

511

$

567,880

$

12,661,690

$

13,229,570

Residences of DeCordova

Granbury, TX

110

1,170,337

8,036,532

9,206,869

Residences of Weatherford

Weatherford, TX

76

1,942,229

5,757,148

7,699,377

Suites on Paseo

San Diego, CA

394

3,162,463

38,387,617

41,550,080

The 50/50 MF Property

Lincoln, NE

475

-

32,928,878

32,928,878

Jade Park

Daytona, FL

144

2,292,035

7,317,084

9,609,119

Land held for development

Various

N/A

4,491,925

-

4,491,925

$

118,715,818

Less accumulated depreciation

(15,101,930

)

Total real estate assets

$

103,613,888

Real Estate Assets at December 31, 2016

Property Name

Location

Number of

Units

Land and Land

Improvements

Buildings and

Improvements

Carrying Value on

December 31, 2016

Eagle Village

Evansville, IN

511

$

567,880

$

12,655,244

$

13,223,124

Northern View

Highland Heights, KY

294

688,539

8,088,059

8,776,598

Residences of DeCordova

Granbury, TX

110

1,170,337

8,029,404

9,199,741

Residences of Weatherford

Weatherford, TX

76

1,942,229

5,751,260

7,693,489

Suites on Paseo

San Diego, CA

394

3,162,463

38,365,351

41,527,814

The 50/50 MF Property

Lincoln, NE

475

-

32,928,878

32,928,878

Jade Park

Daytona, FL

144

2,292,035

7,270,845

9,562,880

Land held for development

Various

N/A

7,531,104

-

7,531,104

$

130,443,628

Less accumulated depreciation

(16,217,028

)

Total real estate assets

$

114,226,600

Recent Transactions

In March 2017, the Partnership sold its 99% limited partner interest in Northern View. Gross proceeds from the sale were approximately $13.8 million. The Partnership recognized a gain on sale of approximately $7.2 million before income taxes. The gain on sale, net of income taxes, is considered Tier 2 income (See Note 3). The Partnership determined the sale did not meet the criteria for discontinued operations.

Net income (loss), exclusive of the gains on sale, related to the Arboretum (sold in June 2016), Woodland Park (Sold in July 2016) and Northern View MF Properties for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

Net income (loss)

$

(3,291

)

$

172,552

At March 31, 2017, the Partnership had executed a Purchase and Sale Agreement (“PSA”) to sell a parcel of land in St. Petersburg, Florida. The carrying value of the land is approximately $3.0 million. See Note 24 for further discussion.

During 2016, the Partnership executed PSAs to acquire two contiguous tracts of land in Omaha, Nebraska. If these tracts of land are successfully acquired, they will be classified as “Land held for development.”

9. Investment in Unconsolidated Entities

ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, has equity commitments and reported equity contributions as investment in unconsolidated entities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The investments represent the Partnership’s maximum exposure to loss. ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC is the only limited equity investor in the unconsolidated

17


entities. An affiliate of the unconsolidated entities guarantees ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC’s return on its investments during the construc tion period. The return on these investments earned by the Partnership is reported as investment income.

In March 2017, the Partnership closed on an $11.7 million equity commitment to fund construction of the Vantage at Panama City Beach multifamily property. The Partnership also entered into a guarantee agreement related to the property’s construction loan (Note 18).

The following table provides the details of the investments in unconsolidated entities at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Property Name

Location

Units

Carrying Value at March 31, 2017

Carrying Value at December 31, 2016

Maximum

Remaining

Equity Commitment at March 31, 2017

Vantage at Corpus Christi

Corpus Christi, TX

288

$

8,689,554

$

8,447,343

$

1,550,000

Vantage at Waco

Waco, TX

288

8,118,507

5,964,861

1,592,039

Vantage at Boerne

Boerne, TX

288

7,458,519

5,057,802

1,695,453

Vantage at Panama City Beach

Panama City Beach, FL

288

5,317,745

-

6,427,707

$

29,584,325

$

19,470,006

$

11,265,199

10. Property Loans, Net of Loan Loss Allowances

The Partnership had the following Property Loans, Net of Loan Loss Allowances, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

March 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Property loans receivable

$

38,063,647

$

36,862,148

Less: Loan loss allowance

(7,098,814

)

(7,098,814

)

Total property loans receivable

$

30,964,833

$

29,763,334

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Partnership advanced funds to Vantage at Brooks, LLC and Vantage at Braunfels, LLC of $879,000 and $823,000, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Partnership advanced net funds to Cross Creek of $6,000, to FAH of $2,500, to Vantage at Brooks, LLC of $3.7 million and to Vantage at Braunfels, LLC of $2.1 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Partnership received $500,000 of principal from the Winston Group, Inc.

The Partnership’s property loans to Ashley Square, Cross Creek, and Lake Forest remain on nonaccrual status at March 31, 2017. The Partnership recognizes interest income on impaired loans when cash is received and the Partnership will reassess the property loan’s nonaccrual status.

The following table summarizes the Partnership’s property loans, net of loan loss allowances, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

March 31, 2017

Outstanding

Balance

Accrued Interest

Loan Loss

Allowances

Interest

Allowance

Net Taxable

Property Loans

Arbors at Hickory Ridge

$

191,264

$

58,587

$

-

$

-

$

249,851

Ashley Square

5,078,342

-

(3,596,342

)

-

1,482,000

Avistar (February 2013 portfolio)

274,496

101,441

-

-

375,937

Avistar (June 2013 portfolio)

251,622

92,988

-

-

344,610

Cross Creek

7,155,545

-

(3,447,472

)

-

3,708,073

Greens Property

850,000

500,449

-

-

1,350,449

Lake Forest

4,623,704

-

(55,000

)

-

4,568,704

Ohio Properties

2,390,446

1,082,461

-

-

3,472,907

Vantage at Brooks, LLC

8,078,002

67,317

-

-

8,145,319

Vantage at Braunfels, LLC

7,170,226

59,752

-

-

7,229,978

Winston Group, Inc

2,000,000

14,000

-

-

2,014,000

Total

$

38,063,647

$

1,976,995

$

(7,098,814

)

$

-

$

32,941,828

18


December 31, 2016

Outstanding

Balance

Accrued Interest

Loan Loss

Allowances

Interest

Allowance

Net Taxable

Property Loans

Arbors at Hickory Ridge

$

191,264

$

54,742

$

-

$

-

$

246,006

Ashley Square

5,078,342

-

(3,596,342

)

-

1,482,000

Avistar (February 2013 portfolio)

274,496

90,491

-

-

364,987

Avistar (June 2013 portfolio)

251,622

82,951

-

-

334,573

Cross Creek

7,155,545

-

(3,447,472

)

-

3,708,073

Greens Property

850,000

467,511

-

-

1,317,511

Lake Forest

4,623,704

-

(55,000

)

-

4,568,704

Ohio Properties

2,390,446

1,021,723

-

-

3,412,169

Vantage at Brooks, LLC

7,199,424

743,928

-

-

7,943,352

Vantage at Braunfels, LLC

6,347,305

703,416

-

-

7,050,721

Winston Group, Inc

2,500,000

-

-

-

2,500,000

Total

$

36,862,148

$

3,164,762

$

(7,098,814

)

$

-

$

32,928,096

11. Income Tax Provision

The Partnership recognizes current income tax expense for federal, state, and local income taxes incurred by our taxable subsidiary, the Greens Hold Co, which owns all the MF Properties except the Suites on Paseo and Jade Park. The Partnership’s income tax expense fluctuates from period to period based on the timing of the taxable income. Deferred income tax expense is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences and the utilization of net operating losses generated in prior years that had been previously recognized as a deferred income tax asset.

The following represents income tax expense for the Greens Hold Co for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

Current income tax expense

$

2,622,047

$

-

Deferred income tax benefit

(164,000

)

-

Total income tax expense

$

2,458,047

$

-

12. Other Assets

The following represents the Other Assets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

March 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Deferred financing costs - net

$

386,548

$

456,890

Fair value of derivative instruments (Note 19)

151,730

383,604

Taxable bonds at fair market value

4,179,205

4,084,599

Bond purchase commitments - fair value (Note 20)

2,620,393

2,399,449

Other assets

1,309,411

1,470,650

Total other assets

$

8,647,287

$

8,795,192

13. Unsecured Lines of Credit

The following represents the unsecured lines of credit (“LOC”) at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Unsecured Lines of Credit

Outstanding on March 31, 2017

Total Commitment

Maturity

Variable /

Fixed

Reset

Frequency

Period End

Rate

Bankers Trust

$

-

$

40,000,000

May 2018

Variable

Monthly

3.31

%

Bankers Trust operating

-

7,500,000

May 2018

Variable

Monthly

4.06

%

Total unsecured lines of credit

$

-

$

47,500,000

19


Unsecured Lines of Credit

Outstanding on December 31, 2016

Total Commitment

Maturity

Variable /

Fixed

Reset

Frequency

Period End

Rate

Bankers Trust

$

40,000,000

$

40,000,000

May 2018

Variable

Monthly

3.13

%

Bankers Trust operating

-

7,500,000

May 2018

Variable

Monthly

3.88

%

Total unsecured lines of credit

$

40,000,000

$

47,500,000

The Partnership is required to make prepayments of the principal to reduce the Bankers Trust Operating LOC to zero for fifteen consecutive calendar days during each calendar quarter.  For all periods presented the Partnership has fulfilled its prepayment obligation.   In addition, the Partnership has fulfilled its second quarter of 2017 prepayment obligation as it maintained a zero balance in the Operating LOC for the first fifteen days of April 2017. The Partnership is in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2017.

14. Secured Line of Credit

In December 2016, the Partnership entered into a secured Credit Agreement of up to $20.0 million with Bankers Trust. The secured LOC was paid in full in February 2017 and is no longer available to the Partnership at March 31, 2017.

15. Debt Financing

The following represents the Debt Financing, net of deferred financing costs, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Outstanding Debt

Financings on

March 31, 2017, net

Restricted

Cash

Years

Acquired

Stated Maturities

Reset

Frequency

SIFMA

Based Rates

Facility Fees

Period End

Rates

TOB & Term A/B

Trusts Securitization

Fixed - Term TOB

$

46,846,532

$

-

2014

July 2017 - July 2019

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.01% - 4.39%

Fixed - Term A/B

275,162,869

1,247,698

2016-2017

March 2017 - February 2027

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.64% - 4.46%

Variable - TOB

42,455,000

-

2012

June 2017

Weekly

1.48 - 1.56%

1.62%

3.10 - 3.18%

TEBS Financings

Variable - TEBS I

60,404,699

52,065

2010

September 2017 (2)

Weekly

0.97

%

1.85%

2.82%

Variable - TEBS II (1)

91,226,919

171,322

2014

July 2019

Weekly

0.95

%

1.67%

2.62%

Variable - TEBS III (1)

82,027,687

3,483,665

2015

July 2020

Weekly

0.95

%

1.44%

2.39%

Total Debt Financings

$

598,123,706

(1)

Facility fees are variable

(2)

ATAX TEBS I, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, may terminate the M24 TEBS Financing at its option on either September 15, 2017 or September 15, 2020. Should the Partnership not elect to terminate the M24 TEBS Financing on these dates, the full term of the M24 TEBS Financing will run through the final principal payment date associated with the securitized bonds, or July 15, 2050.

Outstanding Debt

Financings on

December 31, 2016, net

Restricted

Cash

Years

Acquired

Stated Maturities

Reset

Frequency

SIFMA

Based Rates

Facility Fees

Period End

Rates

TOB & Term A/B

Trusts Securitization

Fixed - Term TOB

$

46,860,699

$

-

2014

July 2017 - July 2019

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.01% - 4.39%

Fixed - Term A/B

171,778,950

1,373,695

2016

March 2017 - December 2026

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.64% - 4.56%

Variable - TOB

42,455,000

-

2012

Dec 2016

Weekly

1.29 - 1.39%

1.62%

2.91 - 3.01%

TEBS Financings

Variable - TEBS I

60,430,991

396,412

2010

September 2017

Weekly

0.77%

1.85%

2.62%

Variable - TEBS II (1)

91,768,081

170,988

2014

July 2019

Weekly

0.75%

1.62%

2.37%

Variable - TEBS III (1)

82,089,312

3,495,592

2015

July 2020

Weekly

0.75%

1.39%

2.14%

Total Debt Financings

$

495,383,033

(1)

Facility fees are variable

20


At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Partnership posted cash collateral (i.e. restricted cash) related to the interest rate swaps associated with specific Term A/B Trusts. In addition, to mitigate its exposure to interest rate fluctuations on the variable rate TEBS Financings, the Partnership also entered into interest rate cap agreements (Note 17).

The TOB and Term A/B Trusts are subject to a Master Trust Agreement with DB that contains covenants with which the Partnership is required to comply. If the Partnership were to be out of compliance with any of these covenants, a termination event of the financing facilities would be triggered. The most restrictive covenant within the Master Trust Agreement states that cash available to distribute for the trailing twelve months must be at least two times trailing twelve-month interest expense. At March 31, 2017, the Partnership was in compliance with these covenants.

Debt Financing Activity in the First Quarter of 2017

In February 2017, the Partnership entered into 19 new Term A/B Trust financings secured by various MRBs. The Partnership capitalized costs totaling approximately $1.2 million as deferred financing costs, of which approximately $921,000 was paid to a related party (Note 21). The following table summarizes the terms of the new Term A/B Trusts:

Term A/B Trusts Securitization

Outstanding Term A/B

Trust Financing at

March 31, 2017, net

Year

Acquired

Stated Maturity

Fixed Interest

Rate

San Vicente - Series A

$

3,106,826

2017

February 2022

3.89

%

San Vicente - Series B

1,532,587

2017

June 2018

3.76

%

Las Palmas - Series A

1,503,641

2017

February 2022

3.89

%

Las Palmas - Series B

1,479,573

2017

June 2018

3.76

%

The Village at Madera - Series A

2,740,786

2017

February 2022

3.89

%

The Village at Madera - Series B

1,443,242

2017

July 2018

3.76

%

Harmony Court Bakersfield - Series A

3,315,877

2017

February 2022

3.89

%

Harmony Court Bakersfield - Series B

1,676,521

2017

July 2018

3.76

%

Summerhill - Series A

5,721,078

2017

February 2022

3.89

%

Summerhill - Series B

2,837,225

2017

July 2018

3.76

%

Courtyard - Series A

9,118,911

2017

February 2022

3.89

%

Courtyard - Series B

5,242,064

2017

July 2018

3.76

%

Seasons Lakewood - Series A

6,545,788

2017

February 2022

3.89

%

Seasons Lakewood - Series B

4,427,691

2017

August 2018

3.76

%

Seasons San Juan Capistrano - Series A

11,032,559

2017

February 2022

3.89

%

Seasons San Juan Capistrano - Series B

5,535,047

2017

August 2018

3.76

%

Avistar at Wood Hollow - Series A

26,821,903

2017

February 2027

4.46

%

Avistar at Wilcrest - Series A

3,165,250

2017

February 2027

4.46

%

Avistar at Copperfield - Series A

8,409,054

2017

February 2027

4.46

%

Total Term A/B Trust Financing

$

105,655,623

In March 2017, the Partnership refinanced four Term A/B Trusts into new Term A/B Trusts with longer stated terms. Based on the terms of the new and old Term A/B Trusts, the refinancing was accounted for as a modification, with approximately $47,000 capitalized as deferred financing costs. The following table summarizes the terms of the new Term A/B Trusts:

Term A/B Trusts Securitization

Outstanding Term A/B

Trust Financing at

March 31, 2017, net

Year

Acquired

Stated Maturity

Fixed Interest

Rate

Oaks at Georgetown - Series A

$

11,085,441

2017

March 2022

3.89

%

Oaks at Georgetown - Series B

4,681,745

2017

August 2018

3.76

%

Harmony Terrace - Series A

6,198,322

2017

March 2022

3.89

%

Harmony Terrace - Series B

6,277,910

2017

August 2018

3.76

%

Total Term A/B Trust Financing

$

28,243,418

Debt Financing Activity in the First Quarter of 2016

The three MBS TOB Trusts and the TOB Trust collateralized by the Pro Nova 2014-2 MRB were paid in full and collapsed in January 2016 and March 2016, respectively.

21


The following represents the Debt Financi ng contractual maturities for the next five years and thereafter:

2017

$

116,900,695

2018

38,554,927

2019

130,763,081

2020

83,278,656

2021

2,303,044

Thereafter

231,975,250

Total

$

603,775,653

16. Mortgages Payable and Other Secured Financing

The following represents the Mortgages payable and other secured financing, net of deferred financing costs, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

MF Property Mortgage Payables

Outstanding Mortgage

Payable at

March 31, 2017, net

Year

Acquired

Stated Maturity

Variable / Fixed

Reset Frequency

Variable

Based Rate

Facility Fees

Period End

Rate

Eagle Village (1)

$

7,797,894

2010

September 2018

Variable

Monthly

0.81

%

3.00

%

3.81

%

Residences of DeCordova

1,727,786

2012

June 2017

Fixed

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.75

%

Residences of Weatherford

5,528,191

2011

June 2017

Fixed

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.75

%

The 50/50 MF

Property--Mortgage (2)

24,984,591

2013

March 2020

Variable

Monthly

3.75

%

N/A

3.75

%

The 50/50 MF Property--TIF

Loan

3,673,665

2014

December 2019

Fixed

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.65

%

Jade Park

7,462,933

2016

October 2021

Fixed

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.85

%

Total Mortgage Payable\Weighted

Average Period End Rate

$

51,175,060

3.98

%

(1)

Variable rate is based on LIBOR

(2)

Variable rate is based on Wall Street Journal Prime Rate

MF Property Mortgage Payables

Outstanding Mortgage

Payable at

December 31, 2016, net

Year

Acquired

Stated Maturity

Variable / Fixed

Reset Frequency

Variable

Based Rate

Facility Fees

Period End

Rate

Eagle Village (1)

7,845,711

2010

September 2018

Variable

Monthly

0.63

%

3.00

%

3.63

%

Residences of DeCordova

1,744,858

2012

June 2017

Fixed

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.75

%

Residences of Weatherford

5,589,086

2011

June 2017

Fixed

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.75

%

The 50/50 MF

Property--Mortgage (2)

25,082,636

2013

March 2020

Variable

Monthly

3.50

%

N/A

3.50

%

The 50/50 MF Property--TIF

Loan

3,656,090

2014

December 2019

Fixed

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.65

%

Jade Park

7,461,131

2016

October 2021

Fixed

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.85

%

Total Mortgage Payable\Weighted

Average Period End Rate

$

51,379,512

3.83

%

(1)

Variable rate is based on LIBOR

(2)

Variable rate is based on Wall Street Journal Prime Rate

The following represents the Mortgages payable and other secured financing contractual maturities for the next five years and thereafter:

2017

$

8,017,670

2018

8,475,223

2019

4,166,034

2020

23,968,377

2021

6,858,994

Thereafter

-

Total mortgages payable and other secured financings

$

51,486,298

22


17 . Interest Rate Derivative Agreements

The following represents the interest rate derivatives, excluding interest rate swaps, at March 31, 2017:

Purchase Date

Initial Notional Amount

Maturity Date

Effective

Capped Rate

Index

Purchase Price

Variable Debt

Financing Facility

Hedged

Maximum

Potential

Cost of

Borrowing

Counterparty

Fair Value - Asset (Liability) (1)

Sept 2010

$

31,936,667

Sept 2017

3.0

%

SIFMA

$

921,000

M24 TEBS

5.0

%

Bank of New York Mellon

$

-

Sept 2010

31,936,667

Sept 2017

3.0

%

SIFMA

845,600

M24 TEBS

5.0

%

Barclays Bank PLC

-

Sept 2010

31,936,667

Sept 2017

3.0

%

SIFMA

928,000

M24 TEBS

5.0

%

Royal Bank of Canada

-

Aug 2013

93,305,000

Sept 2017

1.5

%

SIFMA

793,000

M24 TEBS

3.5

%

Deutsche Bank

29

July 2014

31,565,000

Aug 2019

3.0

%

SIFMA

315,200

M31 TEBS

4.4

%

Barclays Bank PLC

8,622

July 2014

31,565,000

Aug 2019

3.0

%

SIFMA

343,000

M31 TEBS

4.4

%

Royal Bank of Canada

8,622

July 2014

31,565,000

Aug 2019

3.0

%

SIFMA

333,200

M31 TEBS

4.4

%

SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

8,622

July 2015

28,095,000

Aug 2020

3.0

%

SIFMA

210,000

M33 TEBS

4.3

%

Wells Fargo Bank

41,945

July 2015

28,095,000

Aug 2020

3.0

%

SIFMA

187,688

M33 TEBS

4.3

%

Royal Bank of Canada

41,945

July 2015

28,095,000

Aug 2020

3.0

%

SIFMA

174,900

M33 TEBS

4.3

%

SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

41,945

$

151,730

(1)

For additional details, see Note 22 to the Partnership's condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Partnership has contracted for two interest rate swaps with DB related to the Decatur Angle and Bruton Term A/B Financings securitized by MRBs for Decatur Angle and Bruton Apartments. The following table summarizes the terms of the interest rate swaps at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Purchase Date

Initial Notional Amount

Effective Date

Termination Date

Fixed Rate Paid

Period End Variable Rate Received

Variable Rate & Index

Counterparty

March 31, 2017 - Fair Value of Liability

December 31, 2016 - Fair Value of Liability

Sept 2014

$

23,000,000

Oct 2016

Oct 2021

1.96

%

0.68

%

70% 30-day LIBOR

Deutsche Bank

$

(637,090

)

$

(738,574

)

Sept 2014

$

18,126,731

April 2017

April 2022

2.06

%

N/A

70% 30-day LIBOR

Deutsche Bank

(591,668

)

(600,709

)

$

(1,228,758

)

$

(1,339,283

)

The Partnership’s interest rate derivatives and interest rate swaps are not designated as hedging instruments and, accordingly, they are recorded at fair value. Changes in fair value are included in current period earnings as interest expense. See Note 22 for a description of the methodology and significant assumptions for determining the fair value of the interest rate derivatives and interest rate swap arrangements. The interest rate derivatives are presented within Other assets and the interest rate swap arrangements are reported as a derivative swap liability on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

18. Commitments and Contingencies

The Partnership, from time to time, may be subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business.  These matters are frequently covered by insurance.  If it has been determined that a loss is probable, the estimated amount of the loss is accrued in the condensed consolidated financial statements. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Bond Purchase Commitments

As part of the Partnership’s strategy of acquiring MRBs, it will enter into bond purchase commitments related to MRBs to be issued and secured by properties under construction.  Upon satisfaction of the terms of the bond purchase commitment, the proceeds from the MRBs issued will be used to pay off the construction related debt. The Partnership bears no construction or stabilization risk during

23


the commitment period. The Partnership accounts for bond purchase commitments as available-for-sale securities and reports the asset or liability at fair value. Changes in the fair value of bond purchase commitments are recorded in Other comprehensive income.

The following table represents the bond purchase commitments at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Bond Purchase Commitments

Commitment Date

Maximum

Committed

Amounts for

2017

Maximum

Committed

Amounts for

2018

Rate

Closing

Date (1)

Fair Value at

March 31, 2017

Fair Value at

December 31,2016

Villas at Plano Gateway Apartments

December 2014

$

-

$

-

6.00

%

N/A

$

-

$

838,200

Village at Rivers Edge

May 2015

11,000,000

-

6.00

%

Q2 2017

643,720

467,720

Palo Alto

July 2015

19,540,000

-

5.80

%

Q3 2017

1,116,320

627,429

Village at Avalon

November 2015

-

16,400,000

5.80

%

Q2 2018

860,353

466,100

Total

$

30,540,000

$

16,400,000

$

2,620,393

$

2,399,449

(1)

The closing dates are estimated.

On April 1, 2017, the bond purchase commitment for the Villas at Plano Gateway Apartments expired effective April 1, 2017. The bond purchase commitment was cancelled and the Partnership has no obligation under the agreement after expiration.

Property Loan Commitments

ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, committed to loan approximately $17.0 million to unrelated third parties to build two new multifamily residential properties, Vantage at Brooks, LLC and Vantage at Braunfels, LLC, both located in Texas. At March 31, 2017, the Partnership’s remaining maximum commitments totaled approximately $1.7 million (see Note 11).

Other Guarantees & Commitments

In March 2017, the Partnership entered into a guaranty agreement whereby the Partnership has guaranteed payment of the construction loan of Vantage at Panama City Beach, LLC. The Partnership will only have to perform on the guarantee upon a default by Vantage at Panama City Beach, LLC. The guarantee is initially for the entire amount of the construction loan and decreases to 50% and 25% as certain debt service coverage levels are obtained by the borrower. The construction loan has a maximum available balance of $25.6 million. At March 31, 2017, there was no outstanding balance on the construction loan and the Partnership had no exposure under the guarantee. The Partnership is also required to maintain minimum cash and net worth requirements, which were met as of March 31, 2017.

In connection with the sale of the Greens Property in 2012, the Partnership entered into guarantee agreements with an unaffiliated entity under which the Partnership has guaranteed certain obligations of the general partner of the Greens of Pine Glen limited partnership, including an obligation to repurchase the interests of BC Partners if certain “repurchase events” occur.  Remaining potential repurchase events relate primarily to the delivery of LIHTCs, or tax credit recapture and foreclosure.  No amount has been accrued for this contingent liability because the likelihood of a repurchase event is remote.  The maximum exposure to the Partnership at March 31, 2017, under the guarantee provision of the repurchase clause is approximately $2.8 million and represents 75% of the equity contributed by BC Partners.

In connection with the Ohio Properties transaction in 2011, the Partnership entered into guarantee agreements with an unaffiliated entity under which the Partnership has guaranteed certain obligations of the general partner of these limited partnerships, including an obligation to repurchase the interests of BC Partners if certain “repurchase events” occur.  Remaining potential repurchase events relate primarily to the delivery of LIHTCs, or tax credit recapture and foreclosure.  No amount has been accrued for this contingent liability because the likelihood of a repurchase event is remote.  The maximum exposure to the Partnership at March 31, 2017, under the guarantee provision of the repurchase clause is approximately $4.4 million and represents 75% of the equity contributed by BC Partners.

The 50/50 MF Property has a ground lease with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln with an initial lease term expiring in March 2038. There is also an option to extend the lease for an additional five-year period.  Annual lease payments are $100 per year. In conjunction with the ground lease, the 50/50 MF Property has entered into an agreement whereby it is required to make monthly payments, when cash is available at the property, to the University of Nebraska-Lincoln based on its revenues.  The minimum aggregate annual payment due under the agreement for the twelve-month period from August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2017 is approximately $122,000. The minimum aggregate annual expense increases 2% annually until July 31, 2034 and increases 3% annually thereafter.  The 50/50

24


MF Property may be required to make additional payments under the agreement if its gross revenues exceed certain thresholds. The agreement will terminate upon termination of the ground lease . The Partnership reported accounts payable related to this agreement of approximately $52,000 and $21,000 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Partnership reported expenses related to the agreement of approximately $42,000 for the three months end ed March 31, 2017 and 2016.

As the holder of residual interests issued in connection with its TOB Trust, Term A/B Trust and TEBS Financing arrangements, the Partnership is required to guarantee certain losses that can be incurred by the trusts created in connection with these financings.  These guarantees may result from a downgrade in the investment rating of PHCs held by the trust or of the senior securities issued by the trust, a ratings downgrade of the liquidity provider for the trust, increases in short term interest rates beyond pre-set maximums, an inability to re-market the senior securities or an inability to obtain liquidity for the trust. In the case of the TEBS, Freddie Mac will step in first on an immediate basis and the Partnership will have 10 to 14 days to remedy. In each of these cases, the trust will be collapsed.  If the proceeds from the sale of the trust collateral are not sufficient to pay the principal amount of the senior securities with accrued interest and the other expenses of the trusts and the Partnership does not remedy, there is a termination and the Partnership will be required to fund any such shortfall pursuant to its guarantee. If the Partnership does not fund the shortfall, the default and liquidation provisions will be invoked against the Partnership. In the event of a shortfall the maximum exposure to loss would be approximately $603.8 million prior to the consideration of the proceeds from the sale of the trust collateral. The Partnership has never been, and does not expect in the future, to be required to reimburse the financing facilities for any shortfall.

19. Redeemable Series A Preferred Units

In March 2017, the Partnership issued non-cumulative, non-voting, non-convertible Series A Preferred Units via private placements to two financial institutions. The Partnership had previously issued Series A Preferred Units to these financial institutions during 2016. The Series A Preferred Units are redeemable in the future and represent limited partnership interests in the Partnership.  The following table summarizes the outstanding Series A Preferred Units at March 31, 2017:

March 31, 2017

Month Issued

Units

Purchase Price

Distribution Rate

Redemption Price per Unit

Earliest Redemption Date

March 2016

1,000,000

$

10,000,000

3.00

%

$

10.00

March 2022

May 2016

1,386,900

13,869,000

3.00

%

10.00

May 2022

September 2016

1,000,000

10,000,000

3.00

%

10.00

September 2022

December 2016

700,000

7,000,000

3.00

%

10.00

December 2022

March 2017

1,613,100

16,131,000

3.00

%

10.00

March 2023

5,700,000

$

57,000,000

20. Restricted Unit Awards (“RUAs”)

The Partnership’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”), as approved by the Unitholders, permits the grant of Restricted Units and other awards to the employees of Burlington, the Partnership, or any affiliate of either, and members of Burlington’s Board of Managers for up to 3.0 million BUCs. RUAs are generally granted with vesting conditions ranging from three months to approximately three years. RUAs currently provide for the payment of quarterly distributions during the vesting period. The RUA’s provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control or death or disability of the Participant.

The fair value of each RUA is estimated on the grant date based on the Partnership’s exchange-listed closing price of the BUCs. The Partnership recognizes compensation expense for the RUAs on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period. The compensation expense for RUAs totaled approximately $171,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017. No compensation expense for RUAs was recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

The following table represents nonvested Restricted Units at and for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Restricted Units Awarded

Weighted-average Grant-date Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2017

158,304

$

6.03

Granted

173,138

5.70

Vested

-

-

Nonvested at March 31, 2017

331,442

$

5.86

25


At March 31, 2017 , there was approximately $1.6 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested RUAs granted under the Plan.  The remaining expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years. The total intrinsic value of nonvested RUAs was approxima tely $1.9 million at March 31, 2017.

21. Transactions with Related Parties

The General Partner of the Partnership, AFCA 2, is entitled to receive an administrative fee from the Partnership equal to 0.45% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of any of its MRBs, property loans collateralized by real property, and other investments for which the owner of the financed property or other third party is not obligated to pay such administrative fee directly to AFCA 2.  The Partnership paid or accrued administrative fees to AFCA 2 of approximately $865,000 and $687,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In addition to the administrative fees paid directly by the Partnership, AFCA 2 receives administrative fees directly from the owners of properties financed by certain of the MRBs held by the Partnership.  These administrative fees also equal 0.45% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of these MRBs and totaled approximately $15,000 and $19,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

AFCA 2 earns placement fees in connection with the acquisition of certain MRBs, equity investments in unconsolidated entities and select property loans.  These placement fees were paid by the owners of the respective properties and, accordingly, have not been reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements because these properties are not considered consolidated VIEs or related parties.  AFCA 2 earned placement fees of approximately $938,000 and $388,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

An affiliate of AFCA 2, Burlington Capital Properties, LLC (f/k/a America First Properties Management Company, LLC) (“Properties Management”) provided property management services for the MF Properties (excluding Suites on Paseo) and seven of the properties collateralized by the MRBs during the three months ended March 31, 2017. Properties Management earned management fees of approximately $244,000 and $312,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  For the properties collateralized by the MRBs, these property management fees are not Partnership expenses, but are paid in each case by the owner of the Residential Properties.  For MF Properties, the property management fees are reflected as real estate operating expenses on the Partnership’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.  The property management fees are paid out of the revenues generated by the respective property prior to the payment of debt service on the Partnership's MRBs and property loans, if applicable.

An affiliate of AFCA 2, Farnam Capital Advisors, LLC, acts as an origination advisor and consultant to the borrowers when MRBs, investments in unconsolidated entities, select notes receivable, and financing facilities are acquired by the Partnership. The borrowers paid origination fees of approximately $269,000 and $194,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These origination fees were paid by the borrower and have not been reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The Partnership paid consulting fees to the affiliate of approximately $921,000 for services related to origination of Term A/B Trusts during the three months ended March 31, 2017. No such fees were paid to the affiliate during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

22. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Current accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a framework for measuring fair value and provides for expanded disclosures about fair value measurements.  The guidance:

Defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date; and

Establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability on the measurement date.

Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk.  To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, the fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for asset or liabilities.

26


The categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value.

Investments in MRBs and Bond Purchase Commitments. The fair values of the Partnership’s investments in MRBs and mortgage bond purchase commitments have each been based on a discounted cash flow or yield to maturity analysis. There is no active trading market for the MRBs and price quotes for the MRBs are not available.  If available, the Partnership may also consider price quotes on similar MRBs or other information from external sources, such as pricing services.  The estimates of the fair values of these MRBs, whether estimated by the Partnership or based on external sources, are based largely on unobservable inputs the Partnership believes would be used by market participants.  Additionally, the calculation methodology used by the external sources and the Partnership encompasses the use of judgment in its application. To validate changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s investments in MRBs between reporting periods, the Partnership looks at the key inputs such as changes in the ‘A’ rated municipal bond rates on similar MRBs as well as changes in the operating performance of the underlying property serving as collateral for each MRB.  The Partnership validates that the changes in the estimated fair value of the MRBs move with the changes in these monitored factors.  Given these facts, the fair value measurement of the Partnership’s investment in MRBs is categorized as a Level 3 input.  At March 31, 2017, the range of effective yields on the individual MRBs was 4.8% to 12.0% per annum. At December 31, 2016, the range of effective yields on the individual MRBs was 4.9% to 12.4% per annum.

The fair value of the bond purchase commitments is determined in the same manner as the MRBs.

Investments in Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificates. The fair value of the Partnership’s investment in PHC Certificates at March 31, 2017 is based upon prices obtained from a third-party pricing service, which are indicative of market prices. There is no active trading market for the trusts’ certificates owned by the Partnership. The valuation methodology of the Partnership’s third party pricing service incorporates commonly used market pricing methods. It considers the underlying characteristics of each PHC Trust as well as other quantitative and qualitative characteristics including, but not limited to, market interest rates, security ratings from rating agencies, the impact of potential political and regulatory change, and other inputs. The Partnership analyzes pricing data received from the third-party pricing service by comparing it to the Partnership’s internal valuation methodology. The Partnership’s internal valuation methodology begins with the current market yield rate for a “AAA” rated tax-free municipal bond for a term consistent with the weighted-average life of each of the Public Housing Capital Fund trusts, adjusted largely for unobservable inputs the Partnership believes would be used by market participants. The valuation methodologies used by the third-party pricing service and the Partnership encompass the use of judgment in their application. Due to the judgments involved, the fair value measurement of the Partnership’s investment in PHC Certificates is categorized as a Level 3 input.

The fair value of the Partnership’s investment in PHC Certificates at December 31, 2016 was based on a yield to maturity analysis performed by the Partnership. The Partnership’s valuation methodology begins with the current market yield rate for a “AAA” rated tax-free municipal bond for a term consistent with the weighted-average life of each of the Public Housing Capital Fund trusts, adjusted largely for unobservable inputs the Partnership believes would be used by market participants. The Partnership validates that the changes in the estimated fair value of PHC Certificates move with the changes in the market yield rates of investment grade rated mortgage revenue municipal bonds with terms of similar length. Given these facts, the fair value measurement of the Partnership’s investment in PHC Certificates is categorized as a Level 3 input.  At December 31, 2016, the range of effective yields on the PHC Certificates was 4.3% to 6.0% per annum.

Taxable Bonds. The fair values of the Partnership’s investments in taxable bonds have each been based on a discounted cash flow or yield to maturity analysis. There is no active trading market for the taxable bonds and price quotes are not available. The estimates of the fair values of these taxable bonds, whether estimated by the Partnership or based on external sources, are based largely on unobservable inputs the Partnership believes would be used by market participants.  Additionally, the calculation methodology used by the external sources and the Partnership encompasses the use of judgment in its application. To validate changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s investments in taxable bonds between reporting periods, management looks at the key inputs such as changes in the current market yields on similar bonds as well as changes in the operating performance of the underlying property serving as collateral for each bond.  The Partnership validates that the changes in the estimated fair value of the taxable bonds move with the changes in these monitored factors.  Given these facts the fair value measurement of the Partnership’s investment in taxable bonds is categorized as a Level 3 input.

Interest Rate Derivatives. The effect of the Partnership’s interest rate derivatives is to set a cap, or upper limit, on the base rate of interest paid on the Partnership’s variable rate debt equal to the notional amount of the derivative agreement.   The effect of the Partnership’s interest rate swaps is to change a variable rate debt obligation to a fixed rate for that portion of the debt equal to the notional amount of the derivative agreement.  The fair value of the interest rate derivatives is based on a model whose inputs are not

27


observable and therefore is categorized as a Level 3 input.  The inputs in the v aluation model include three-month LIBOR rates, unobservable adjustments to account for the SIFMA index, as well as any recent interest rate cap trades with similar terms.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2017 are summarized as follows:

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017

Description

Assets and

Liabilities at Fair

Value

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

Significant

Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets and Liabilities

Mortgage revenue bonds, held in trust

$

731,091,380

$

-

$

-

$

731,091,380

Mortgage revenue bonds

27,814,516

-

-

27,814,516

Bond purchase commitments (reported within

other assets)

2,620,393

-

-

2,620,393

PHC Certificates

55,851,799

-

-

55,851,799

Taxable bonds (reported within other

assets)

4,179,205

-

-

4,179,205

Derivative contracts (reported within other

assets)

151,730

-

-

151,730

Derivative swap liability

(1,228,758

)

-

-

(1,228,758

)

Total Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value, net

$

820,480,265

$

-

$

-

$

820,480,265

The following tables summarizes the activity related to Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2017:

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant

Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Mortgage

Revenue Bonds (1)

Bond Purchase

Commitments

PHC Certificates

Taxable Bonds

Interest Rate Derivatives (2)

Total

Beginning Balance January 1, 2017

$

680,211,051

$

2,399,449

$

57,158,068

$

4,084,599

$

(955,679

)

$

742,897,488

Total gains (losses)

(realized/unrealized)

Included in earnings (interest

income and interest expense)

53,355

-

(17,588

)

-

(121,349

)

(85,582

)

Included in other

comprehensive (loss) income

20,170,553

220,944

(1,288,681

)

98,494

-

19,201,310

Purchases

59,585,000

-

-

-

-

59,585,000

Settlements

(1,114,063

)

-

-

(3,888

)

-

(1,117,951

)

Ending Balance March 31, 2017

$

758,905,896

$

2,620,393

$

55,851,799

$

4,179,205

$

(1,077,028

)

$

820,480,265

Total amount of losses for the period

included in earnings attributable to

the change in unrealized gains or

losses relating to assets or liabilities

held on March 31, 2017

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

(121,349

)

$

(121,349

)

(1) Mortgage revenue bonds includes both bonds held in trust as well as those held by the Partnership.

(2) Interest rate derivatives include derivative contracts reported in other assets as well as derivative swap liabilities.

28


Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows:

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016

Description

Assets and

Liabilities at Fair

Value

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

Significant

Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets and Liabilities

Mortgage revenue bonds held in trust

$

590,194,179

$

-

$

-

$

590,194,179

Mortgage revenue bonds

90,016,872

-

-

90,016,872

Bond purchase commitments (reported within

other assets)

2,399,449

-

-

2,399,449

PHC Certificates

57,158,068

-

-

57,158,068

Taxable bonds (reported within other assets)

4,084,599

-

-

4,084,599

Derivative contracts (reported within other

assets)

383,604

-

-

383,604

Interest swap liability

(1,339,283

)

-

-

(1,339,283

)

Total Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value

$

742,897,488

$

-

$

-

$

742,897,488

The following tables summarizes the activity related to Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2016:

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant

Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Mortgage

Revenue Bonds (1)

Bond Purchase Commitments

PHC Certificates

Taxable Bonds

Interest Rate Derivatives (2)

Total

Beginning Balance January 1, 2016

$

583,683,137

$

5,634,360

$

60,707,290

$

4,824,060

$

(972,898

)

$

653,875,949

Total gains (losses)

(realized/unrealized)

Included in earnings

-

-

-

-

(1,110,407

)

(1,110,407

)

Included in other

comprehensive (loss) income

11,351,627

1,587,813

869,344

116,456

-

13,925,240

Purchases

11,500,000

-

-

-

-

11,500,000

Sale of securities

(9,747,125

)

-

-

-

(399

)

(9,747,524

)

Settlements

(411,270

)

-

(1,071,294

)

(2,412

)

-

(1,484,976

)

Ending Balance March 31, 2016

$

596,376,369

$

7,222,173

$

60,505,340

$

4,938,104

$

(2,083,704

)

$

666,958,282

Total amount of losses for the period

included in earnings attributable to

the change in unrealized gains or

losses relating to assets or liabilities

still held as of March 31, 2016

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

(1,110,407

)

$

(1,110,407

)

(1) Mortgage revenue bonds includes both bonds held in trust as well as those held by the Partnership.

(2) Interest rate derivatives include derivative contracts reported in other assets as well as derivative swap liabilities.

Total gains and losses included in earnings for the periods shown above are included in the Partnership’s condensed consolidated statements of operations as interest expense.

The Partnership estimates the fair value of each financial liability using a discounted cash flow model based on the debt amortization schedules at the effective rate of interest for each period represented.  This estimate of fair value is based on Level 3 inputs.  The table below represents the fair value of the financial liabilities held on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

March 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Carrying Amount

Fair Value

Carrying Amount

Fair Value

Financial Liabilities:

Debt financing and LOCs

$

598,123,706

$

597,301,799

$

555,199,700

$

553,083,924

Mortgages payable and other secured financing

$

51,175,060

$

51,210,197

$

51,379,512

$

51,595,281

29


23. Segments

The Partnership has four reportable segments, Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments, MF Properties, Public Housing Capital Fund Trusts, and Other Investments.  In addition to the four reportable segments, the Partnership also separately reports its consolidation and elimination information because it does not allocate certain items to the segments.  In January 2016, the Partnership sold its three remaining MBS Securities and eliminated this operating segment.

The Amended and Restated LP Agreement authorizes the Partnership to make investments tax-exempt securities other than in MRBs provided that the tax-exempt investments are rated in one of the four highest rating categories by a national securities rating agency. The Amended and Restated LP Agreement also allows the Partnership to invest in other securities whose interest may be taxable for federal income tax purposes. Total tax-exempt and other investments cannot exceed 25% of the Partnership’s total assets at the time of acquisition as required under the Amended and Restated LP Agreement.  In addition, the amount of other investments is limited based on the conditions to the exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940.  The Partnership’s tax-exempt and other investments include PHC Certificates, MBS Securities, and Other Investments, which are reported as three separate segments.

Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments Segment

The Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments segment consists of the Partnership’s portfolio of MRBs and related property loans which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for Residential Properties and commercial properties in their market areas.  Such MRBs are held as investments and the related property loans, net of loan loss, are reported as such on the Partnership’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.  At March 31, 2017, the Partnership held 89 MRBs. The Residential Properties financed by MRBs contain a total of 10,656 rental units. In addition, one bond (Pro Nova 2014-1) is collateralized by commercial real estate. All general and administrative expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations are allocated to this operating segment.

MF Properties Segment

The MF Properties segment consists of multifamily, student housing, and senior citizen residential properties held by the Partnership. During the time the Partnership holds an interest in an MF Property, any net rental income generated by the MF Properties in excess of debt service will be available for distribution to the Partnership in accordance with its interest in the MF Property.  At March 31, 2017, the Partnership consolidated the results of six MF Properties containing a total of 1,710 rental units. Income tax expense for the Greens Hold Co is reported within this segment.

Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Segment

The Public Housing Capital Fund Trust segment consists of the assets, liabilities, and related income and expenses of the Partnership’s PHC Certificates (see Note 7).

Other Investments Segment

The Other investments segment consists of the operations of ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, which is invested in unconsolidated entities (Note 9) and has issued property loans due from Vantage at Brooks LLC and Vantage at Braunfels LLC (Note 10).

30


The following table details certain key financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

2017

2016

Total revenues

Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments

$

10,588,498

$

8,779,054

MF Properties

3,792,415

5,074,104

Public Housing Capital Fund Trust

708,786

730,902

MBS Securities Investments

-

48,755

Other Investments

950,689

287,044

Total revenues

$

16,040,388

$

14,919,859

Interest expense

Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments

$

4,571,455

$

3,784,390

MF Properties

525,587

670,333

Public Housing Capital Fund Trust

345,211

300,720

MBS Securities Investments

-

14,692

Other Investments

-

-

Total interest expense

$

5,442,253

$

4,770,135

Depreciation expense

Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments

$

-

$

-

MF Properties

1,355,231

1,646,231

Public Housing Capital Fund Trust

-

-

MBS Securities Investments

-

-

Other Investments

-

-

Total depreciation expense

$

1,355,231

$

1,646,231

Partnership net income (loss)

Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments

$

2,229,053

$

2,030,293

MF Properties

3,745,545

(267,803

)

Public Housing Capital Fund Trust

363,575

430,182

MBS Securities Investments

-

51,984

Other Investments

950,689

287,044

Partnership net income

$

7,288,862

$

2,531,700

The following table details certain key financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

March 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Total assets

Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments

$

849,050,799

$

764,995,675

MF Properties

120,380,712

129,895,112

Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificates

56,246,529

57,461,268

Other Investments

44,959,622

34,540,280

Consolidation/eliminations

(47,105,957

)

(42,778,661

)

Total assets

$

1,023,531,705

$

944,113,674

24. Subsequent Events

In April 2017, Partnership obtained an increase in the Bankers Trust line of credit commitment from $40 million to $50 million. The Partnership paid a commitment fee of $30,000 related to the increase in the commitment, which will be capitalized as deferred financing cost.

In April 2017, the Partnership’s Land held for development in St. Petersburg, Florida met the criteria as assets held for sale.

31


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

In Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the “Partnership” refers to America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. and its Consolidated Subsidiaries at March 31, 2017. See Note 2 and Note 5 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements for further disclosure.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Partnership’s critical accounting policies are the same as those described in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Executive Summary

The Partnership was formed for the primary purpose of acquiring a portfolio of MRBs that are issued by state and local housing authorities to provide construction and/or permanent financing for affordable multifamily and student housing (collectively “Residential Properties”) and commercial properties in their market areas. We expect and believe the interest received on these bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. We may also invest in other types of securities that may or may not be secured by real estate to the extent allowed by the Amended and Restated LP Agreement of the Partnership. We may acquire interests MF Properties in order to position ourselves for future investments in bonds issued to finance these properties and which we expect and believe will generate tax-exempt interest.

At March 31, 2017, the Partnership has four reportable segments: (1) Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments, (2) MF Properties, (3) Public Housing Capital Fund Trust, and (4) Other Investments. In the first quarter of 2016, the Partnership sold its remaining three mortgage-backed securities (“MBS Securities”). The sale of the Partnership’s MBS Securities eliminated the MBS Securities Investment reportable segment. In addition to the reportable segments, the Partnership also separately reports its consolidation and elimination information because it does not allocate certain items to the segments.  See Notes 2 and 23 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details.

Recent Investment Activity

The following table presents information regarding the investment activity of the Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

Recent Investment Activity

#

Amount in

000's

Retired Debt

or Note in

000's

Tier 2 income distributable to the General Partner

in 000's (1)

Notes to the

Partnership's

condensed consolidated

financial

statements

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

Mortgage revenue bond acquisitions

6

$

59,585

N/A

N/A

6

MF Property sold

1

13,750

N/A

1,071

8

Investments in unconsolidated entities

3

9,503

N/A

N/A

9

Property loan redemptions

1

500

N/A

N/A

10

Property loan advances

3

1,705

N/A

N/A

10

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016

MBS Securities sold

3

$

15,081

$

11,945

$

-

15

Mortgage revenue bond sold

1

9,479

8,375

-

6, 15

Mortgage revenue bond acquisitions

1

11,500

N/A

N/A

6

Investment in an unconsolidated entity

1

2,443

N/A

N/A

9

Property loan advances, net

2

5,828

N/A

N/A

10

(1) See "Cash Available for Distribution" in this Item 2 below.

32


Recent Financing and Derivative Activities

The following table presents information regarding the financing and derivative activity of the Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

Recent Financing and Derivative Activity

#

Amount of

Change

in Debt,

Derivative,

Preferred

Units in

000's

Secured

Maximum

SIFMA Cap

Rate (1)

Notes to the

Partnership's

condensed

consolidated

financial

statements

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

Net borrowing on unsecured LOCs

2

$

(40,000

)

No

N/A

13

Net borrowing on secured LOC

1

(20,000

)

Yes

N/A

14

New Term A/B Financings with DB

19

106,810

Yes

N/A

15

Refinance of Term A/B Financings with DB

4

(2,245

)

Yes

N/A

15

Redeemable Series A preferred unit issuance

2

16,131

N/A

N/A

19

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016

Net borrowing on unsecured LOCs

3

$

10,488

No

N/A

13

TOB Financing with DB paid in full and collapsed

4

(20,320

)

Yes

N/A

15

Redeemable Series A preferred unit issuance

1

10,000

N/A

N/A

19

Interest rate derivative sold

1

(11,000

)

N/A

1.0

%

17

(1) See "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in Item 3 below.

Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments Segment

The Partnership’s primary purpose is to acquire and hold as investments a portfolio of MRBs which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for Residential Properties and commercial properties in their market areas.

The table below compares total revenues, other income, total interest expense and net income for the Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments segment, reported in 000’s, for the periods indicated:

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

$ Change

% Change

Mortgage Revenue Bond

Investments

Total revenues

$

10,588

$

8,779

$

1,809

20.6

%

Total interest expense

$

4,571

$

3,784

$

787

20.8

%

Net income

$

2,229

$

2,030

$

199

9.8

%

The increase in total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due to the following factors:

An increase of approximately $2.1 million in recurring investment income from MRBs purchased during 2016 and 2017;

A decrease of approximately $222,000 in recurring investment income due to MRB principal payments received, sales and redemptions during 2016 and 2017; and

A decrease of approximately $42,000 in contingent interest income in the first quarter of 2017.

The increase in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is attributable to the following factors:

An increase of approximately $1.0 million due to rising interest rates;

An increase of approximately $776,000 due to increased borrowings, specifically with Term A/B Trusts; and

A decrease of approximately $1.0 million related to fair value adjustments for interest rate derivates.

33


The increase in net income f or the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due to the changes in total revenues and interest expense above and additional general administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased approximately $ 782,000 from additional salaries and restricted unit award expenses and approximately $192,000 of additional administrative fees due to more assets held by the Partnership.

MF Properties Segment

The Partnership’s strategy has been to acquire ownership positions in MF Properties while assessing the viability of restructuring the property ownership through a sale of the MF Properties.

The table below compares total revenues, other income, total interest expense, and net income for the MF Properties segment, reported in 000’s, for the periods indicated:

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

$ Change

% Change

MF Properties

Total revenues

$

3,792

$

5,074

$

(1,282

)

-25.3

%

Other income - Gain on

sale of MF Properties

7,169

-

7,169

100.0

%

Total interest expense

526

670

(144

)

-21.5

%

Net income

3,746

(268

)

4,014

1497.8

%

At March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Partnership and its Consolidated Subsidiaries owned six and eight MF Properties, respectively, which contain a total of 1,710 and 2,217 rental units, respectively.

The decrease in total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due to the following factors:

A decrease of approximately $1.4 million from the sales of the Arboretum and Woodland Park in June and July 2016, respectively, and the sale of Northern View in March 2017;

A decrease of approximately $244,000 less revenue from ongoing operation of the MF Properties, primarily related to declining occupancy at the 50/50 MF Property; and

An increase of approximately $319,000 from the acquisition of Jade Park in September 2016.

Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 consists entirely of the gain on the sale of Northern View in March 2017.

The decrease in interest for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due to the following factors:

A decrease of approximately $173,000 due to lower borrowings, specifically for mortgages related to Arboretum and Woodland Park that were paid off at sale in June and July 2016; and

An increase of approximately $29,000 due to rising interest rates on variable-rate mortgages.

The increase in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due primarily to the $7.2 million gain on sale of Northern View in March 2017. The gain on sale was offset by approximately $2.5 million of income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

At March 31, 2017, Properties Management, an affiliate of AFCA 2, provided property management services for five of the MF Properties and seven of the properties collateralized by the MRBs.  Management believes this relationship provides greater insight and understanding of the underlying property operations and their ability to meet the Partnership’s debt service requirements.

Other Investments Segment

The Other Investments segment consists of the operations of ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, which holds noncontrolling equity investments in certain multifamily projects and has issued property loans due from multifamily projects.

34


The table below compares total revenues and net income for the Other Investments segment, reported in 000’s, for the periods indicated:

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

$ Change

% Change

Other Investments

Total revenues

$

951

$

287

$

664

231.4

%

Net income

$

951

$

287

$

664

231.4

%

The increase in total revenues and net income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to same period in 2016 are due to the following factors:

An increase of approximately $563,000 from returns on investments in unconsolidated entities due to additional equity contributions made during 2016 and 2017; and

An increase of approximately $101,000 in interest income from property loans due to additional principal advances during 2016 and 2017.

Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Segment

The PHC Certificates consist of custodial receipts evidencing loans made to several public housing authorities.

The table below compares total revenues and net income for the Public Housing Capital Fund Trust segment, reported in 000’s, for the periods indicated:

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

$ Change

% Change

PHC Trusts

Total revenues

$

709

$

731

$

(22

)

-3.0

%

Total interest expense

$

345

$

301

$

44

14.6

%

Net income

$

364

$

430

$

(66

)

-15.3

%

The slight decrease in total revenues and net income when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2017 to the same period in 2016 was the result of principal reductions of the PHC Certificates during 2016. Interest expense increased slightly due to rising interest rates during 2016 and the first quarter of 2017.

Former MBS Securities Investments Segment

In January 2016, the Partnership sold its three remaining MBS Securities and collapsed the related MBS TOB Trusts and paid all obligations in full using proceeds from the sale. The sale of the Partnership’s remaining MBS Securities eliminated the MBS Securities Investments segment in the first quarter of 2016.

The table below compares total revenues and net income for the MBS Securities Investments segment, reported in 000’s, for the periods indicated:

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

$ Change

% Change

MBS Securities

Total revenues

$

-

$

49

$

(49

)

-100.0

%

Total interest expense

$

-

$

15

$

(15

)

-100.0

%

Net income

$

-

$

52

$

(52

)

-100.0

%

There were no operations in the MBS Securities Investments segment during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Discussion of the Residential Properties Securing our Mortgage Revenue Bond Holdings and MF Properties

The following tables outline certain information regarding the Residential Properties on which the Partnership holds MRBs as investments and the MF Properties.

35


Non-Consolidated Properties - Stabilized

The owners of the following properties either do not meet the definition of a VIE and/or the Partnership has evaluated and determined it is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE.  As a result, the Partnership does not report the assets, liabilities and results of operations of these properties on a consolidated basis.  At March 31, 2017, these Residential Properties have met the stabilization criteria (see footnote 3 below the table). Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds for the non-consolidated stabilized properties was current at March 31, 2017.

Economic Occupancy (2)

Number

Physical Occupancy (1) at March 31,

For the 3 Months Ended

March 31,

Property Name

State

of Units

2017

2016

2017

2016

Non-Consolidated Properties-Stabilized (3)

Glenview Apartments

CA

88

99

%

98

%

99

%

100

%

Harden Ranch

CA

100

99

%

98

%

98

%

98

%

Montclair Apartments

CA

80

99

%

99

%

101

%

100

%

Santa Fe Apartments

CA

89

99

%

98

%

103

%

98

%

Seasons at Simi Valley

CA

69

100

%

99

%

131

%

149

%

Sycamore Walk

CA

112

99

%

100

%

100

%

102

%

Tyler Park Townhomes

CA

88

97

%

99

%

96

%

98

%

Westside Village Market

CA

81

100

%

99

%

101

%

100

%

Lake Forest Apartments

FL

240

93

%

88

%

90

%

87

%

Ashley Square Apartments

IA

144

92

%

95

%

85

%

93

%

Brookstone Apartments

IL

168

99

%

100

%

97

%

96

%

Copper Gate (6)

IN

128

98

%

100

%

96

%

99

%

Renaissance Gateway

LA

208

99

%

96

%

111

%

92

%

Live 929 Apartments

MD

575

87

%

91

%

87

%

89

%

Woodlynn Village

MN

59

97

%

97

%

99

%

97

%

Greens of Pine Glen Apartments

NC

168

98

%

96

%

87

%

89

%

Silver Moon

NM

151

93

%

88

%

84

%

81

%

Ohio Properties (4)

OH

362

97

%

98

%

92

%

97

%

Bridle Ridge Apartments

SC

152

99

%

99

%

97

%

98

%

Companion at Thornhill Apartments

SC

178

94

%

98

%

85

%

80

%

Cross Creek Apartments

SC

144

99

%

94

%

97

%

92

%

Palms at Premier Park

SC

240

94

%

94

%

86

%

81

%

Arbors of Hickory Ridge

TN

348

91

%

90

%

79

%

80

%

Avistar at Chase Hill

TX

232

86

%

88

%

74

%

77

%

Avistar at the Crest

TX

200

95

%

97

%

78

%

86

%

Avistar at the Oaks

TX

156

94

%

96

%

84

%

85

%

Avistar in 09

TX

133

92

%

95

%

81

%

87

%

Avistar on the Boulevard

TX

344

91

%

92

%

80

%

81

%

Avistar on the Hills

TX

129

95

%

97

%

85

%

89

%

Bella Vista Apartments

TX

144

94

%

94

%

91

%

94

%

Bruton Apartments

TX

264

95

%

14

%

93

%

4

%

Concord at Gulfgate

TX

288

98

%

84

%

92

%

77

%

Concord at Little York

TX

276

99

%

77

%

90

%

66

%

Concord at Williamcrest

TX

288

96

%

86

%

87

%

75

%

Decatur Angle

TX

302

95

%

57

%

90

%

34

%

Heritage Square Apartments

TX

204

90

%

96

%

83

%

79

%

Runnymede Apartments

TX

252

100

%

99

%

97

%

98

%

South Park Ranch Apartments

TX

192

98

%

100

%

97

%

99

%

Vantage at Judson

TX

288

94

%

91

%

85

%

79

%

15 West Apartments (5)

WA

120

96

%

n/a

96

%

n/a

7,784

95

%

89

%

90

%

82

%

(1)

Physical occupancy is defined as the total number of units occupied divided by total units at the date of measurement.

(2)

Economic occupancy is defined as the net rental income received divided by the maximum amount of rental income to be derived from each property. This statistic is reflective of rental concessions, delinquent rents and non-revenue units such as model units and employee units. Physical occupancy is a point in time measure while economic occupancy is a measurement over the period presented. Therefore, economic occupancy for a period may exceed the actual occupancy at any point in time.

(3)

A property is considered stabilized once it reaches 90% occupancy for 90 days and an achievement of 1.15 times debt service coverage ratio on amortizing debt service.

36


(4)

The Partnership holds approximately $17.7 million of MRBs secured by Crescent Village, Willow Bend and Postwoods (Ohio Properties).  Crescent Village is located in Cincinnati, Ohio, Willow Bend is located in Columbus (Hilliard), Ohio and Postwoods is located in Reynoldsburg, Ohio.

(5)

Newly stabilized properties.  Previous period results are not available.

(6)

The physical and economic occupancy amounts for Copper Gate are based on the latest available financial information, which is as of December 31, 2016.

Overall physical occupancy for the stabilized Residential Properties increased at March 31, 2017 as compared to March 31, 2016. The increase is primarily due to the stabilization of the Concord at Gulfgate, Concord at Little York, Concord at Williamcrest, Bruton Apartments and Decatur Angle properties during the latter half 2016.

Overall economic occupancy increased for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is due primarily to the stabilization of Bruton Apartments and Decatur Angle during the latter half of 2016 when significant progress was made on renovations at each property. Economic occupancy also increased due to the addition of 15 West in the fourth quarter of 2016, which has higher economic occupancy than the average of the portfolio.

Non-Consolidated Properties - Not Stabilized

The owners of the following properties do not meet the definition of a VIE and/or the Partnership has evaluated and determined it is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE.  As a result, the Partnership does not report the assets, liabilities and results of operations of these properties on a consolidated basis.  At March 31, 2017, these Residential Properties have not met the stabilization criteria (see footnote 3 below the table). Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds for the non-consolidated non-stabilized properties was current at March 31, 2017.

Economic Occupancy (2)

Number

Physical Occupancy (1) at March 31,

For the 3 Months Ended

March 31,

Property Name

State

of Units

2017

2016

2017

2016

Non-Consolidated Properties-Non Stabilized (3)

Courtyard Apartments (4)

CA

108

99

%

n/a

100

%

n/a

Harmony Court Bakersfield (4)

CA

96

96

%

n/a

92

%

n/a

Harmony Terrace (4)

CA

136

100

%

n/a

135

%

n/a

Las Palmas (4)

CA

81

100

%

n/a

92

%

n/a

San Vicente (4)

CA

50

100

%

n/a

99

%

n/a

Seasons Lakewood (4)

CA

85

99

%

n/a

108

%

n/a

Seasons San Juan Capistrano (4)

CA

112

96

%

n/a

100

%

n/a

Summerhill (4)

CA

128

98

%

n/a

98

%

n/a

The Village at Madera (4)

CA

75

100

%

n/a

99

%

n/a

Columbia Gardens

SC

188

72

%

83

%

72

%

78

%

Willow Run

SC

200

72

%

88

%

73

%

69

%

Avistar at Copperfield (4)

TX

192

83

%

n/a

70

%

n/a

Avistar at the Parkway

TX

236

87

%

44

%

75

%

37

%

Avistar at Wilcrest (4)

TX

88

91

%

n/a

76

%

n/a

Avistar at Wood Hollow (4)

TX

409

86

%

n/a

85

%

n/a

Crossing at 1415

TX

112

77

%

51

%

45

%

36

%

Heights at 515

TX

96

81

%

65

%

66

%

58

%

Oaks at Georgetown (4)

TX

192

94

%

n/a

82

%

n/a

Vantage at Harlingen

TX

288

92

%

78

%

71

%

67

%

2,872

89

%

70

%

84

%

58

%

(1)

Physical occupancy is defined as the total number of units occupied divided by total units at the date of measurement.

(2)

Economic occupancy is defined as the net rental income received divided by the maximum amount of rental income to be derived from each property. This statistic is reflective of rental concessions, delinquent rents and non-revenue units such as model units and employee units. Physical occupancy is a point in time measure while economic occupancy is a measurement over the period presented. Therefore, economic occupancy for a period may exceed the actual occupancy at any point in time.

(3)

During the first quarter of 2017, these properties were under construction or renovation.  As such, these properties are not considered stabilized as they have not met the criteria for stabilization. Stabilization is generally defined as 90% occupancy for 90 days and an achievement of 1.15 times debt service coverage ratio on amortizing debt service.

(4)

Previous period occupancy numbers are not available as these are new investments subsequent to the first quarter of 2016.

Physical and economic occupancy increased in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the first quarter of 2016 primarily due to the addition of non-stabilized Residential Properties with high occupancy subsequent to the first quarter of 2016. These new Residential Properties are scheduled for major rehabilitations and may show a decline in physical and economic occupancy until the

37


rehabilitations are completed. There is no comparable data for the non-stabilized Residential Properties in the first qu arter of 2016 since they were either under significant renovations or were new investments.

MF Properties

The MF Properties are owned by the Partnership and the Greens Hold Co. We own two MF Properties directly and the subsidiary holds controlling ownership interest in the remaining MF Properties.  The properties are encumbered by mortgage loans and other secured financing with an aggregate net principal balance of $51.2 million at March 31, 2017.  We report the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of these properties on a consolidated basis.  At March 31, 2017, all the MF Properties have met the stabilization criteria (see footnote 3 below the table). Debt service on our mortgages payable and other secured financing was current at March 31, 2017.

Economic Occupancy (2)

Number

Physical Occupancy (1) at March 31,

For the 3 Months Ended

March 31,

Property Name

State

of Units

2017

2016

2017

2016

MF Properties-Stabilized (3)

Suites on Paseo

CA

394

95

%

92

%

97

%

79

%

Jade Park (4)

FL

144

81

%

n/a

74

%

n/a

Eagle Village

IN

511

79

%

86

%

83

%

90

%

The 50/50 MF Property

NE

475

75

%

98

%

73

%

98

%

Residences at DeCordova

TX

110

98

%

96

%

93

%

95

%

Residences at Weatherford

TX

76

100

%

99

%

98

%

101

%

1,710

84

%

93

%

85

%

90

%

((1)

Physical occupancy is defined as the total number of units occupied divided by total units at the date of measurement.

(2)

Economic occupancy is defined as the net rental income received divided by the maximum amount of rental income to be derived from each property. This statistic is reflective of rental concessions, delinquent rents and non-revenue units such as model units and employee units. Physical occupancy is a point in time measure while economic occupancy is a measurement over the period presented. Therefore, economic occupancy for a period may exceed the actual occupancy at any point in time.

(3)

A property is considered stabilized once it reaches 90% occupancy for 90 days and an achievement of 1.15 times debt service coverage ratio on amortizing debt service for all MF Properties that are not student housing residential properties. Suites on Paseo, Eagle Village and the 50/50 MF Property are student housing residential properties.

(4)

Previous period occupancy numbers are not available as the property was acquired in September 2016.

Physical and economic occupancy decreased in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the first quarter of 2016 due to declining occupancy at the 50/50 MF Property and the addition of Jade Park with a physical occupancy that is lower than the average of other MF Properties. The Partnership is implementing marketing and pricing changes at the 50/50 MF Property to increase physical occupancy for the fall 2017 semester. Jade Park is currently undergoing an in-place rehabilitation, which has resulted in lower physical and economic occupancy. Occupancy at Jade Park is expected to increase as renovations are completed in the coming quarter.

Results of Operations

The tables and following discussions of the Partnership’s change in total revenues and total expenses, and net income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements and Notes thereto included in Item 1 of this report as well as the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

38


Discussion of the Total Revenues and Other Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

The table below compares revenue and other income for the Partnership for the periods presented:

Change in Total Revenues and Other Income (in 000’s)

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

$ Change

% Change

Revenues and Other Income:

Property revenues

$

3,730

$

5,075

$

(1,345

)

-26.5

%

Investment income

11,470

9,157

2,313

25.3

%

Contingent interest income

133

174

(41

)

-23.6

%

Other interest income

645

514

131

25.5

%

Other income

62

-

62

100.0

%

Gain on sale of MF Property

7,169

-

7,169

100.0

%

Gain on sale of securities

-

8

(8

)

N/A

Total Revenues and Other Income

$

23,209

$

14,928

$

8,281

55.5

%

Property revenues. The decrease in property revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due to the following factors:

A decrease of approximately $1.4 million from the sales of the Arboretum and Woodland Park in June and July 2016, respectively, and the sale of Northern View in March 2017;

A decrease of approximately $244,000 less revenue from ongoing operations of the MF Properties, primarily related to declining occupancy at the 50/50 MF Property; and

An increase of approximately $319,000 from the acquisition of Jade Park in September 2016.

The MF Properties owned by the Partnership at March 31, 2017 averaged monthly net rental revenue of approximately $431 per unit in the first quarter of 2017 as compared with $409 per unit in the first quarter of 2016.

Investment income. Investment income includes interest earned on MRBs, PHC Certificates, MBS Securities (for 2016 only) and other equity investments.  The increase in investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due to the following factors:

An increase of approximately $2.1 million in recurring investment income from MRBs purchased during 2016 and 2017;

An increase of approximately $563,000 from returns on investments in unconsolidated entities due to additional equity contributions made during 2016 and 2017; and

A decrease of approximately $222,000 in recurring investment income due to MRB principal payments received, sales and redemptions during 2016 and 2017.

Contingent interest income. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, contingent interest income was received from available excess cash at Lake Forest. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, contingent interest income was received from available excess cash at Ashley Square.

Other interest income. Other interest income is comprised primarily of interest income on property loans. The increase in other interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was due to the following factors:

An increase of approximately $101,000 in interest income from property loans of Vantage at Brooks and Vantage at New Braunfels due to additional advances in 2016 and 2017;

An increase of approximately $40,000 in interest income from the property loan to the Winston Group, Inc.; and

A decrease of approximately $32,000 in interest income due to settlement of the Foundation for Affordable Housing property loan in December 2016.

Gain on sale of MF Properties. The gain reported for the three months ended March 31, 2017, is from the sale of Northern View in March 2017.

39


Discussion of the Total Expenses for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

The table below compares expenses for the Partnership for the periods presented:

Change in Total Expenses (in 000’s)

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

$ Change

% Change

Expenses:

Real estate operating (exclusive of

items shown below)

$

2,484

$

2,637

$

(153

)

-5.8

%

Depreciation and amortization

1,593

2,125

(532

)

-25.0

%

Amortization of deferred financing

costs

740

532

208

39.1

%

Interest

5,442

4,770

672

14.1

%

General and administrative

3,131

2,332

799

34.3

%

Total Expenses

$

13,390

$

12,396

$

994

8.0

%

Real estate operating expenses. Real estate operating expenses are associated with the MF Properties and are comprised principally of real estate taxes, property insurance, utilities, property management fees, repairs and maintenance, and salaries and related employee expenses of on-site employees. The decrease in real estate operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due to the following factors:

A decrease of approximately $622,000 related to the sales of the Arboretum and Woodland Park during 2016; and

An increase of approximately $270,000 related to the acquisition of Jade Park in September 2016.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation results primarily from the MF Properties.  Amortization consists of in-place lease intangible assets recorded as part of the acquisition-method of accounting for the acquisition of MF Properties.  The decrease in depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due to the following factors:

A decrease of approximately $391,000 in depreciation related to the sales of the Arboretum and Woodland Park during 2016 and Northern View in 2017;

A decrease of approximately $460,000 in amortization at the Suites on Paseo due to the full amortization of acquired in-place leases during 2016; and

An increase of approximately $333,000 in depreciation related to the acquisition of Jade Park in September 2016.

Amortization of deferred financing costs. Deferred financing costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the life of the related debt financing, mortgage payable or other secured financing. The increase in amortization of deferred financing costs for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is due primarily to $203,000 additional expense related to the $20 million secured line of credit arrangement initiated in December 2016 and matured in March 2017.

Interest expense. The increase in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is attributable to the following factors:

An increase of approximately $1.0 million due to rising interest rates;

An increase of approximately $654,000 due to increased borrowings, specifically with Term A/B Trusts; and

A decrease of approximately $1.0 million related to fair value adjustments for interest rate derivatives.

General and administrative expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is attributable to the following factors:

An increase of approximately $611,000 in salaries and benefits expense related primarily to bonuses on significant transactions during the first quarter of 2017;

An increase of approximately $171,000 due to restricted unit awards first issued in September 2016;

40


An increase of approximately $199,000 for administrative fees due to mo re assets owned by the Partnership; and

A decrease of approximately $110,000 in professional fees.

Discussion of the Income Tax Expense for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, the Greens Hold Co, is a corporation subject to federal and state income tax. The Greens Hold Co owns controlling equity interests in the MF Properties, except for Suites on Paseo and Jade Park. The gain on sale of Northern View and normal operating income of the owned MF Properties are subject to federal and state income taxes and the Partnership recorded income tax expense of approximately $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Cash Available for Distribution (“CAD”)

The Partnership utilizes a calculation of CAD as a metric to help determine the Partnership’s ability to make distributions to Unitholders.  The Partnership believes that CAD provides relevant information about the Partnership’s operations and is necessary, along with net income, for understanding its operating results.  To calculate CAD, the Partnership begins with net income and adds back non-cash expenses consisting of amortization expense related to debt financing costs and bond issuance costs, interest rate derivative expense or income, provision for loan losses, impairments on bonds and property loans, and Restricted Units compensation expense, to the Partnership’s net income (loss) as computed in accordance with GAAP, and deducts Tier 2 income (see Note 3 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements) attributable to the Partnership as defined in the Amended and Restated LP Agreement.  Net income is the GAAP measure most comparable to CAD. There is no generally accepted methodology for computing CAD, and the Partnership’s computation of CAD may not be comparable to CAD reported by other companies.  Although the Partnership considers CAD to be a useful measure of the Partnership’s operating performance, CAD is a non-GAAP measure that should not be considered as an alternative to net income or net cash flows from operating activities which are calculated in accordance with GAAP, or any other measures of financial performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP.

The table below shows the calculation of CAD (and a reconciliation of the Partnership’s GAAP net income to CAD) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2017

2016

Partnership net income

$

7,288,862

$

2,531,700

Change in fair value of derivatives and interest rate

derivative amortization

121,349

1,110,407

Depreciation and amortization expense

1,592,826

2,124,898

Amortization of deferred financing costs

740,238

532,187

Restricted units compensation

expense

170,840

-

Deferred income taxes

(164,000

)

-

Redeemable Series A preferred unit distribution and

accretion

(324,642

)

(1,684

)

Tier 2 Income distributable to the General Partner (1)

(1,104,401

)

(43,599

)

Bond purchase premium (discount) amortization

(accretion), net of cash received

(23,507

)

34,696

Total CAD

$

8,297,565

$

6,288,605

Weighted average number of units outstanding, basic

60,037,687

60,252,928

Net income per unit, basic

$

0.10

$

0.04

Total CAD per unit, basic

$

0.14

$

0.10

Distributions per unit

$

0.125

$

0.125

(1)

As described in Note 3 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements, Net Interest Income representing contingent interest and Net Residual Proceeds representing contingent interest (Tier 2 income) will be distributed 75% to the limited partners and Unitholders as a class and 25% to the General Partner. This adjustment represents the 25% of Tier 2 income due to the General Partner.  For the three months ended March 3, 2017, the Partnership reported approximately $4.3 million of Tier 2 income from the gain on the sale of Northern View and approximately $133,000 from contingent interest received from Lake Forest. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Partnership reported approximately $174,000 from contingent interest received from Lake Forest.

There was no non-recurring CAD per unit earned by the Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. Distributions to the Unitholders are determined by the Partnership’s General Partner and may increase or decrease at its discretion.

41


Liq uidity and Capital Resources

The Partnership’s principal source of cash flow includes:

Interest income earned on MRBs;

Interest income earned on the PHC Certificates;

Excess cash flow generated by the MF Properties;

Excess proceeds from the sale of assets; and

Cash flow, net of expenses, from general Partnership operations.

Other sources of cash flow may include:

Interest payments received from property loans; and

Contingent interest received from investments in MRBs or property loans.

Interest income is primarily comprised of fixed rate base interest payments received on our MRBs and PHC Certificates which provides consistent cash receipts throughout the year.  Certain of the MRBs may also generate payments of contingent interest to us from time to time when the underlying Residential Properties generate excess net cash flow.   For additional details, see the Partnership’s condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

Similarly, the economic performance of MF Properties will affect the amount of cash distributions, if any, received by the Partnership from ownership of these properties.  The economic performance of the MF Properties depends on the rental and occupancy rates of the property and on the level of operating expenses. Occupancy rates and rents are directly affected by the supply of, and demand for, apartments in the market area in which a property is located.  This, in turn, is affected by several factors such as local or national economic conditions, the amount of new apartment construction and the affordability of single-family homes.  In addition, factors such as government regulation (such as zoning laws), inflation, real estate and other taxes, labor problems, and natural disasters can affect the economic operations of an apartment property.  For discussion related to economic risk see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Other sources of cash available to the Partnership include:

Unsecured lines of credit;

Debt financing;

Mortgages payable and other secured financings;

Sale of Series A Preferred Units; and

Sale of additional BUCs.

At March 31, 2017, the Partnership had borrowed the following amounts:

Debt financing, net - $598.1 million; and

Mortgages payable and other secured financing, net - $51.2 million.

In addition, as of March 31, 2017, the Partnership had issued 5.7 million Series A Preferred units at a subscription price of $10.00 per unit.  We issued approximately 1.6 million Series A Preferred Units during the three months ended March 31, 2017 for gross proceeds of approximately $16.1 million. We did not issue any BUCs during 2017 or 2016.

Our principal uses of cash are (i) general, administrative and operating expenses, (ii) interest and principal payable on the unsecured and secured lines of credit, (iii) interest and principal payable on the debt financing and mortgages payable and other secured financing, and (iv) payment of distributions to Series A Preferred Unitholders and BUC holders. We also use cash to acquire additional investments.

(i)

Payment of general, administrative, and operating expenses

The MF Properties’ primary uses of cash were for operating expenses.  We also used cash for general and administrative expenses. For additional details, see the Partnership’s condensed consolidated statement of cash flows in this Form 10-Q.

42


(ii)

Payment of interest and principal on unsecured and secured lines of credit

We maintain two unsecured lines of credit: an operating and a revolving line of credit. Our operating line of credit allows for the advance of up to $7.5 million to be used for general operations. We are required to make prepayments of the principal to reduce outstanding principal balance on the operating line to zero for fifteen consecutive days during each calendar quarter. We fulfilled this requirement during the three months ended March 31, 2017. In addition, we have fulfilled this requirement for the second quarter of 2017. Our $50 million revolving line of credit may be utilized for the purchase of multifamily real estate and taxable or tax-exempt MRBs. Advances on the line of credit are due on the 270 th day following the advance date, but may be extended by making certain payments for up to an additional 270 days. Our $20 million secured term line of credit was used to finance the purchase of MRBs and matured in March 2017. The secured line of credit was closed and is not available for use by the Partnership at March 31, 2017.

(iii)

Payment of interest and principal on debt and mortgages payable and other secured financing

Our debt financing arrangements consist of various secured financing transactions to leverage our portfolio of MRBs and other investments. The financing arrangements generally involve the securitization of MRBs and other investments into trusts whereby we retain beneficial interests in the trusts that provide certain rights to the underlying investment assets. The remaining beneficial interests are sold to unaffiliated parties with the proceeds being received by the Partnership. The beneficial interests held by unaffiliated parties require periodic interest payments, which may be fixed or variable depending on the terms of the arrangement, and scheduled principal payments.

Our mortgages payable and other secured financing arrangements are used to leverage our MF Properties. The mortgages and other secured financing are entered into with financial institutions and are secured by security interests in the MF Properties. The mortgages and other secured financing bear interest, which may be fixed or variable depending on the terms of the arrangement, and scheduled principal payments.

We anticipate refinancing all financing arrangements coming due in 2017 with similar arrangements of terms greater than one year.

(iv)

Payment of distributions to the Unitholders – Series A Preferred and BUC holders

Distributions to the Series A Preferred unitholders, if declared by the General Partner, will be paid at a fixed rate of 3.0% annually.  The Series A Preferred units are non-cumulative, non-voting and non-convertible.

Distributions to the BUC holders may increase or decrease at the determination of the General Partner.  The per unit cash available for distribution primarily depends on the amount of interest and other cash received by us from our portfolio of MRBs and other investments, the amount of our outstanding debt and the effective interest rates paid by us on this debt, the level of operating and other cash expenses incurred by us, and the number of units outstanding. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we generated cash available for distribution of $0.14 per unit. For further discussion, see the “Cash Available for Distribution” in this section.

Leverage Ratio

We utilize leverage to enhance rates of return to our Unitholders. We use target ratios for each type of financing obligation utilized by us to manage an overall 70% leverage constraint, as previously established by the Partnership’s Board of Managers (the “Board”).  The amount of leverage utilized is dependent upon several factors, including the assets being leveraged, the leverage program utilized, constraints of market collateral calls and the liquidity and marketability of the underlying collateral of the asset being leveraged. We defined our leverage ratio as total outstanding debt divided by total assets using the carrying value of the MRBs, PHC Certificates, initial finance costs and the MF Properties at cost. At March 31, 2017, our overall leverage ratio was approximately 66%.

Cash Flows

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we generated $2.0 million of cash, which was the net result of $4.9 million provided by operating activities, $51.6 million used in investing activities, and $48.7 million provided by financing activities.

Cash provided by operating activities were steady at $4.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Cash used in investing activities totaled $51.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to cash provided by investing activities of $6.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease is due primarily to an increase of $48.1 million of cash used for MRB acquisitions. In addition, the sale of MRBs in the first quarter of 2016 resulted in cash of $9.3 million and such sale did not reoccur in the first quarter of 2017.

43


Cash provided by financing activities totaled $48.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to cash used in financing activities of $10.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase is due to an increase of net proceeds from Debt Financing of $125.1 million, which was offset by a decrease of net proceeds from unsecured and secured lines of credit of $70.5 million.   In addition, the Partnership received $6.1 million of additional proceeds from the issuance of Series A Preferred Units for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016.

We believe our cash balance and cash provided by the sources discussed herein will be sufficient to pay, or refinance, our debt obligations and to meet our liquidity needs over the next 12 months.

Contractual Obligations

As discussed herein and in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, the debt and mortgage obligations of the Partnership consist of scheduled principal payments on the TOB Trust and Term A/B Trust financing facilities with DB, the TEBS credit facilities with Freddie Mac, and payments on the MF Property mortgages payable and other secured financing.

The Partnership’s contractual obligations presented in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which is incorporated by reference herein, have only changed pursuant to the executed contracts during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as disclosed herein.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion on recently issued accounting pronouncements, please see Note 2 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

There have been no material changes in market risk, except as discussed below, from the information provided under “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Item 7A of the Partnership’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Mortgage Revenue Bonds and PHC Certificate Sensitivity Analysis

We value our MRBs using discounted cash flow and yield to maturity analyses which encompasses judgment in its application.  The key assumption in our yield to maturity analysis is the range of effective yields of the individual MRBs.  The effective yield analysis for each MRB considers the current market yield on similar MRBs as well as the debt service coverage ratio of each underlying property serving as collateral for the MRB.

We value the PHC Certificates based upon prices obtained from a third-party pricing service, which are indicative of market prices. There is no active trading market for the trusts’ certificates. The valuation methodology of our third-party pricing service incorporates commonly used market pricing methods. It considers the underlying characteristics of each PHC Trust as well as other quantitative and qualitative characteristics including, but not limited to, market interest rates, security ratings from rating agencies, the impact of potential political and regulatory change, and other inputs. The fair value estimate by the third-party pricing service encompasses the use of judgement in its application.

We completed a sensitivity analysis which is hypothetical and is as of a specific point in time.  If available, we may also consider price quotes on similar MRBs or other information from external sources, such as pricing services.  Pricing services, broker quotes and our analyses provide indicative pricing only. The results of the sensitivity analysis may not be indicative of actual changes in fair value and should be used with caution.

44


The table below summarizes the sensitivity analysis metrics rela ted to the investments in the MRBs and PHC Certificates at March 31, 2017:

Description

Estimated Fair Value in 000's

Range of Effective Yields used in Valuation

Range of Effective Yields if 10% Adverse Applied

Additional Unrealized Losses with 10% Adverse Change in 000's

Mortgage Revenue Bonds

$

758,906

4.8

%

-  12.0%

5.2

%

-  13.1%

$

42,983

PHC Certificates

55,852

5.0

%

-   5.9%

5.5

%

-    6.4%

1,896

Geographic Risk

The properties securing the MRBs are geographically dispersed throughout the United States with significant concentrations (geographic risk) in Texas, California, and South Carolina.  At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the geographic concentration in Texas as a percentage of the total MRB principal outstanding was approximately 50% and 45%, respectively.  At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the geographic concentration in California as a percentage of the total MRB principal outstanding was approximately 18% and 20%, respectively.   At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the geographic concentration in South Carolina as a percentage of the total MRB principal outstanding was approximately 11% and 12%, respectively.  After review of the properties’ economic performance in Texas, California and South Carolina as compared to general market conditions in these markets, we do not believe we are exposed to adverse risk in these markets.

Summary of Interest Rates on Borrowings and Interest Rate Cap Agreements

At March 31, 2017, the total costs of borrowing by investment type were as follows:

range between approximately 3.3% and 4.1% for the unsecured LOCs;

range between approximately 2.4% and 2.8% for the M24, M31, and M33 TEBS facilities;

range between approximately 3.1% and 4.4% for the TOB Trusts securitized by MRBs;

range between approximately 3.6% and 4.6% for the Term A/B Trusts securitized by MRBs;

range between approximately 3.1% and 3.2% for the PHC Trust Certificates TOB Trusts; and

range between approximately 3.8% and 4.8% for the MF Property mortgages and other secured financing.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Partnership’s interest rate cap agreements at March 31, 2017:

Purchase Date

Initial Notional Amount

Maturity Date

Effective

Capped Rate

Index

Purchase Price

Variable Debt

Financing Facility

Hedged

Maximum

Potential

Cost of

Borrowing

Counterparty

Fair Value - Asset (Liability) (1)

Sept 2010

$

31,936,667

Sept 2017

3.0

%

SIFMA

$

921,000

M24 TEBS

5.0

%

Bank of New York Mellon

$

-

Sept 2010

31,936,667

Sept 2017

3.0

%

SIFMA

845,600

M24 TEBS

5.0

%

Barclays Bank PLC

-

Sept 2010

31,936,667

Sept 2017

3.0

%

SIFMA

928,000

M24 TEBS

5.0

%

Royal Bank of Canada

-

Aug 2013

93,305,000

Sept 2017

1.5

%

SIFMA

793,000

M24 TEBS

3.5

%

Deutsche Bank

29

July 2014

31,565,000

Aug 2019

3.0

%

SIFMA

315,200

M31 TEBS

4.4

%

Barclays Bank PLC

8,622

July 2014

31,565,000

Aug 2019

3.0

%

SIFMA

343,000

M31 TEBS

4.4

%

Royal Bank of Canada

8,622

July 2014

31,565,000

Aug 2019

3.0

%

SIFMA

333,200

M31 TEBS

4.4

%

SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

8,622

July 2015

28,095,000

Aug 2020

3.0

%

SIFMA

210,000

M33 TEBS

4.3

%

Wells Fargo Bank

41,945

July 2015

28,095,000

Aug 2020

3.0

%

SIFMA

187,688

M33 TEBS

4.3

%

Royal Bank of Canada

41,945

July 2015

28,095,000

Aug 2020

3.0

%

SIFMA

174,900

M33 TEBS

4.3

%

SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

41,945

$

151,730

(1)

For additional details, see Note 22 to the Partnership's condensed consolidated financial statements.

45


The Partnership has contracted for two interest rate swaps with DB related to the Decatur Angle and Bruton Term A/B Financings securitized by MRBs for Decatur Angle and Bruton Apartments. The following table summarizes the terms of the interest ra te swaps at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Purchase Date

Initial Notional Amount

Effective Date

Termination Date

Fixed Rate Paid

Period End Variable Rate Received

Variable Rate & Index

Counterparty

March 31, 2017 - Fair Value of Liability

December 31, 2016 - Fair Value of Liability

Sept 2014

$

23,000,000

Oct 2016

Oct 2021

1.96

%

0.68

%

70% 30-day LIBOR

Deutsche Bank

$

(637,090

)

$

(738,574

)

Sept 2014

$

18,126,731

April 2017

April 2022

2.06

%

N/A

70% 30-day LIBOR

Deutsche Bank

(591,668

)

(600,709

)

$

(1,228,758

)

$

(1,339,283

)

Interest Rates Risk – Change in Net Interest Income

The following table sets forth information regarding the impact on the Partnership’s income assuming a change in interest rates:

Description

- 25 basis points

+ 50 basis points

+ 100 basis points

+ 150 basis points

+ 200 basis points

TOB & Term A/B Debt Financings

$

5,432

$

(10,911

)

$

(22,612

)

$

(36,573

)

$

(60,366

)

TEBS Debt Financings

301,160

(602,615

)

(1,124,345

)

(1,588,447

)

(2,137,967

)

Other Investment Financings

15,022

(30,030

)

(60,041

)

(90,033

)

(120,008

)

Total

$

321,614

$

(643,556

)

$

(1,206,998

)

$

(1,715,053

)

$

(2,318,341

)

The interest rate sensitivity table (“Table”) represents the change in interest income from investments net of interest on debt and interest rate derivative expenses, and CAD, over the next twelve months assuming an immediate parallel shift in the LIBOR yield curve and the resulting implied forward rates are realized as a component of this shift in the curve.  Assumptions include anticipated interest rates, relationships between interest rate indices and outstanding investments, liabilities and interest rate derivative positions.

No assurance can be made that the assumptions included in the Table presented herein will occur or that other events would not occur that would affect the outcomes of the analysis.  Furthermore, the results included in the Table assume the Partnership does not act to change its sensitivity to the movement in interest rates.

As the above information incorporates only those material positions or exposures that existed as of March 31, 2017, it does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. The ultimate economic impact of these market risks will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our risk mitigating strategies at that time and the overall business and economic environment.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the  Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s current disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that (i) information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Partnership’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that there were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

46


PART II - OTHE R INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The risk factors affecting the Partnership are described in Item 1A “Risk Factors” in the Partnership’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10‑K, which is incorporated by reference herein. There have been no material changes from these previously disclosed risk factors for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On March 8, 2017, the Partnership announced that the Board of Managers of Burlington, which is the general partner of the Partnership’s General Partner, authorized a unit repurchase program for up to 254,656 of the Partnership’s outstanding BUCs. Under the terms of the repurchase program, BUCs may be repurchased from time to time at the Partnership’s discretion on the open market, through block trades, or otherwise, subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements, and other considerations.  The program does not have a stated expiration date and will continue until all the BUCs authorized under the program have been repurchased, or the program is otherwise modified or terminated by the Board in its sole discretion.  For the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Partnership repurchased 144,748 BUCs under the program for approximately $823,000.

Information on the BUCs repurchased during the three months ended March 31, 2017 under the program is as follows:

Period

Total number of shares (or units) purchased

Average price paid per share (or unit)

Total number of shares (or units) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs

Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares (or units) that may yet be purchased under the plans or program

January 1 - January 31, 2017

-

$

-

-

-

February 1 - February 28, 2017

-

-

-

-

March 1 - March 31, 2017

144,748

5.69

144,748

109,908

144,748

$

5.69

144,748

Item 6. Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed as required by Item 15(a)(3) of this report.  Exhibit numbers refer to the paragraph numbers under Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

10.1

Series A Preferred Units Subscription Agreement dated March 3, 2017.

10.2

Series A Preferred Units Subscription Agreement dated March 31, 2017.

31.1

Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101

The following materials from the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are filed herewith, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets on March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Such materials are presented with detailed tagging of notes and financial statement schedules.

47


SIGNA TURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

AMERICA FIRST MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS, L.P.

Date: May 5, 2017

By:

/s/ Chad L. Daffer

Chad L. Daffer

Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 5, 2017

By:

/s/ Craig S. Allen

Craig S. Allen

Chief Financial Officer

48

TABLE OF CONTENTS