GLBZ 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2015

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 0-24047

GLEN BURNIE BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 766-3300

Inapplicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed from last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-Accelerated Filer ☐ Smaller Reporting Company ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

At August 6, 2015, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock was 2,771,174.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

GLEN BURNIE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The accompanying condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2014, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. However, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited consolidated financial statements have been included in the results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015.

Basic earnings per share of common stock are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are calculated by including the average dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the periods. Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of stock options, calculated using the treasury stock method.

Diluted earnings per share calculations were not required for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, since there were no options outstanding.

The FASB has issued several exposure drafts which, if adopted, would significantly alter the Company’s (and all other financial institutions’) method of accounting for, and reporting, its financial assets and some liabilities from a historical cost method to a fair value method of accounting as well as the reported amount of net interest income. Also, the FASB has issued several exposure drafts regarding a change in the accounting for leases. Under this exposure draft, the total amount of “lease rights” and total amount of future payments required under all leases would be reflected on the balance sheets of all entities as assets and debt. If the changes under discussion in either of these exposure drafts are adopted, the financial statements of the Company could be materially impacted as to the amounts of recorded assets, liabilities, capital, net interest income, interest expense, depreciation expense, rent expense and net income. The Company has not determined the extent of the possible changes at this time. The exposure drafts are in different stages of review, approval and possible adoption.

ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, is expected to eliminate diversity in practice as it provides guidance on financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The changes were effective for the Company during the first quarter of 2014. Adoption of this ASU had no impact on the financial statements of the Company.

In May 2014, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (the “IASB”) jointly issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Previous revenue recognition guidance in GAAP comprised broad revenue recognition concepts together with numerous revenue requirements for particular industries or transactions, which sometimes resulted in different accounting for economically similar transactions. In contrast, IFRS provided limited revenue recognition guidance and, consequently, could be difficult to apply to complex transactions. Accordingly, the FASB and the IASB initiated a joint project to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS that would: (1) Remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements; (2) Provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues; (3) Improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets; (4) Provide more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements; and (5) Simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. To meet those objectives, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, ”Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies generally will be required to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. The standard is now effective for public entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is not permitted. For financial reporting purposes, the standard allows for either full retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or modified retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU No. 2014-09 and will be closely monitoring developments and additional guidance to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, ”Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” The amendments in the ASU require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation , as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. The amendments in this ASU are effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015; early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this ASU either: (1) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date; or (2) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. As of June 30, 2014, the Company did not have any share-based payment awards that include performance targets that could be achieved after the requisite service period. As such, the adoption of ASU No. 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2014-11, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860).” ASU 2014-11 requires that repurchase-to-maturity transactions be accounted for as secured borrowings consistent with the accounting for other repurchase agreements. In addition, ASU 2014-11 requires separate accounting for repurchase financings, which entails the transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty. ASU 2014-11 requires entities to disclose certain information about transfers accounted for as sales in transactions that are economically similar to repurchase agreements. In addition, ASU 2014-11 requires disclosures related to collateral, remaining contractual tenor and of the potential risks associated with repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions and repurchase-to-maturity transactions. ASU 2014-11 became effective for us on January 1, 2015 and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2015-01, “Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20) – Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items.” ASU 2015-01 eliminates from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items, which, among other things, required an entity to segregate extraordinary items considered to be unusual and infrequent from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. ASU 2015-01 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2016, though early adoption is permitted. ASU 2015-01 is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810) – Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” ASU 2015-02 implements changes to both the variable interest consolidation model and the voting interest consolidation model. ASU 2015-02 (i) eliminates certain criteria that must be met when determining when fees paid to a decision maker or service provider do not represent a variable interest, (ii) amends the criteria for determining whether a limited partnership is a variable interest entity and (iii)  eliminates the presumption that a general partner controls a limited partnership in the voting model. ASU 2015-02 will be effective for us on January 1, 2016 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) – Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs . ” ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in ASU 2015-03. ASU 2015-03 will be effective for us on January 1, 2016, though early adoption is permitted. ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2015-05, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) – Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.” ASU 2015-05 addresses accounting for fees paid by a customer in cloud computing arrangements such as (i) software as a service, (ii) platform as a service (iii) infrastructure as a service and (iv) other similar hosting arrangements. ASU 2015-05 provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. ASU 2015-05 will be effective for us on January 1, 2016 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

In May 2015, the FASB Issued ASU 2015-09, ”Financial Services-Insurance: Disclosures About Short-Duration Contracts.” ASU 2015-09 requires entities to provide additional disclosures about the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses to increase the transparency of significant estimates. ASU 2015-09 also requires entities to disclose information about significant changes in methodologies and assumption used to calculate the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, including reasons for the change and the effects on the financial statements. ASU 2015-09 also requires entities to disclose a rollforward of the liability of unpaid claims and claim adjustment expense for annual and interim reporting periods. The effective date of ASU 2015-09 is for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim reporting periods within annual period beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU 2015-09 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements.

Fair Value Hierarchy

ASC 820-10 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. In accordance with ASC 820-10, these inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

☐          Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

☐          Level 2 – Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices in active markets for similar securities)

☐          Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs (including the Company’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities that are subject to ASC 820-10.

The Company’s bond holdings in the investment securities portfolio are the only asset or liability subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis. Two assets are valued under Level 1 inputs at June 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014. The Company has assets measured by fair value measurements on a non-recurring basis during 2015. At June 30, 2015, these assets include 33 loans classified as impaired, which include nonaccrual, past due 90 days or more and still accruing, and a homogeneous pool of indirect loans all considered to be impaired loans, which are valued under Level 3 inputs and one property classified as OREO valued under Level 2 inputs.

The changes in the assets subject to fair value measurements are summarized below by Level:

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are summarized below. The fair values of a significant portion of these financial instruments are estimates derived using present value techniques and may not be indicative of the net realizable or liquidation values. Also, the calculation of estimated fair values is based on market conditions at a specific point in time and may not reflect current or future fair values.

Fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar instruments or estimated using discounted cash flows. The discounts used are estimated using comparable market rates for similar types of instruments adjusted to be commensurate with the credit risk, overhead costs and optionality of such instruments.

The fair value of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, investments in restricted stocks and accrued interest receivable are equal to the carrying amounts. The fair values of investment securities are determined using market quotations. The fair value of loans receivable is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis.

The fair value of non-interest bearing deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposit accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and accrued interest payable are equal to the carrying amounts. The fair value of fixed-maturity time deposits is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis.

The gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2015 are as follows:

At June 30, 2015, the company owned one pooled trust preferred security issued by Regional Diversified Funding, Senior Notes with a Moody’s rating of Ca. The market for this security (two different portions) at June 30, 2015 was not active and markets for similar securities were also not active. As a result, the Company had cash flow testing performed as of June 30, 2015 by an unrelated third party specialist in order to measure the possible extent of other-than-temporary-impairment (“OTTI”). This testing assumed future defaults on the currently performing financial institutions of 150 basis points applied annually with a 0% recovery on both current and future defaulting financial institutions. No write-down was taken in the first six months of 2015.

Declines in the fair value of held to maturity and available for sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary-impairment losses, management considers, among other things, (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain it’s investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

As of June 30, 2015, management had the ability and intent to hold the securities classified as available for sale for a period of time sufficient for a recovery of cost. On June 30, 2015, the Bank held 29 investment securities having continuous unrealized loss positions for more than 12 months. Management has determined that all unrealized losses are either due to increases in market interest rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased, current call features that are nearing, and the effect the sub-prime market has had on all mortgage-backed securities. The Bank has no mortgage-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. Management does not believe any of the securities are impaired due to reasons of credit quality. Except as noted above, as of June 30, 2015, management believes the impairments detailed in the table above are temporary and no impairment loss has been realized in the Company’s consolidated income statement.

A rollforward of the cumulative other-than-temporary credit losses recognized in earnings for all debt securities for which a portion of an other-than-temporary loss is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss is as follows:

Forward-Looking Statements

When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, the words or phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made, and readers are advised that various factors could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected. While it is impossible to identify all such factors, such factors include, but are not limited to, those risks identified in the Company’s periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Overview

Glen Burnie Bancorp, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), through its subsidiary, The Bank of Glen Burnie, a Maryland banking corporation (the “Bank”), operates a commercial bank with eight offices in Anne Arundel County Maryland. The Company had consolidated net income of $518,000 ($0.19 basic and diluted earnings per share) for the second quarter of 2015, compared to the second quarter of 2014 consolidated net income of $435,000 ($0.16 basic and diluted income per share), a 19.08% increase. Year-to-date net income was $898,000 ($0.32 basic and diluted earnings per share), compared to the 2014 consolidated net income of $908,000 ($0.33 basic and diluted income per share), a 1.10% decrease. The increase in net income for the three month period was primarily due to the increase in gains on investment securities and a non-recurring gain of $421,000 on the redemption of insurance policies in the quarter. This was partially offset by a reduction in loan and state and municipal income and an increase in the provision for loan loss. The decrease in net income for the six month period was primarily due to the decline in loan and state and municipal income and the increase in the provision for loan losses. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, deposits increased by $9,726,000 and net loans decreased by $8,190,000.

Results Of Operations

Net Interest Income . The Company’s consolidated net interest income prior to provision for credit losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was $2,767,000 and $5,627,000, compared to $2,932,000 and $6,019,000, respectively, for the same period in 2014, a decrease of $165,000 (5.63%) for the three months and a decrease of $392,000 (6.52%) for the six months.

Interest income for the second quarter decreased from $3,560,000 in 2014 to $3,374,000 in 2015, a 5.22% decrease. Interest income for the six months decreased from $7,235,000 in 2014 to $6,854,000 in 2015, a 5.27% decrease. The primary reason for the decline in interest income for the 2015 period when compared to the 2014 period was the decline in loan income as both yields and balances declined.

Interest expense for the second quarter decreased from $628,000 in 2014 to $607,000 in 2015, a 3.35% decrease. Interest expense for the six months increased from $1,216,000 in 2014 to $1,227,000 in 2015, a 0.91% increase. Interest expense in the second quarter decreased due to the decrease in interest rates paid. Interest expense for the six month period increased due to the increase in deposit balances.

Net interest margins on a tax equivalent basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was 3.16% and 3.24%, compared to 3.33% and 3.54% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 . The decrease of the net interest margin for both periods was primarily due to declining yields on earning assets, as loan balances have declined and the balances of lower yielding securities have continued to increase.

Provision for Credit Losses . The Company made a provision for credit losses of $150,000 and $300,000 during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2015 and $112,000 and $150,000 during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2015, the allowance for credit losses equaled 60.80% of non-accrual and past due loans compared to 104.84% at December 31, 2014 and 70.28% at June 30, 2014. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded net charge-offs of $68,000 and $144,000, compared to net charge-offs of $425,000 and $459,000 during the corresponding period of the prior year. On an annualized basis, net charge-offs for the 2015 period represent 0.10% of the average loan portfolio.

Other Income . Other income increased from $510,000 for the three month period ended June 30, 2014, to $1,038,000 for the corresponding 2015 period, a $528,000 (103.53%) increase. Other income increased from $943,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2014, to $1,576,000 for the corresponding 2015 period, a $633,000 (67.13%) increase. The increase for the three and six month periods were due to an increase in gains on investment securities and non-recurring gains on the redemption of insurance policies.

Other Expenses . Other expenses increased from $2,832,000 for the three month period ended June 30, 2014, to $2,869,000 for the corresponding 2015 period, a $37,000 (1.31%) increase. The increase for the three month period was primarily due to an increase in collection expense offset by various decreases in other categories. Other expenses decreased from $5,747,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2014, to $5,688,000 for the corresponding 2015 period, a $59,000 (1.03%) decrease. The decrease for the six month period was primarily due to a decrease in occupancy expense and other expenses including other loan expense, postage expense, and losses on Other Real Estate Owned, partially offset by the increase in collection expense.

Income Taxes . During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded income tax expense of $268,000 and $317,000, compared to income tax expense of $63,000 and $157,000 for the same respective periods in 2014. The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and six month period in 2015 was 34.10% and 26.09%, respectively, compared to 12.65% and 14.74% for the prior year period. The increase in the effective tax rate for the three and six month periods were due to the gain of $421,000 on the redemption of insurance policies and a payment to the Comptroller of Maryland of $66,000 for unentitled refunds received in 2004 and 2007.

Comprehensive Income. In accordance with regulatory requirements, the Company reports comprehensive income in its financial statements. Comprehensive income consists of the Company’s net income, adjusted for unrealized gains and losses on the Bank’s investment portfolio of investment securities. For the second quarter of 2015, comprehensive loss, net of tax, totaled $365,000, compared to the June 30, 2014 comprehensive income, net of tax, of $1,089,000. Year-to-date, comprehensive income, net of tax, totaled $181,000, compared to the June 30, 2014 comprehensive income of $2,737,000. The decrease for the three and six month periods were due to a decrease in the net unrealized gain on securities during the second quarter.

Financial Condition

General. The Company’s assets increased to $403,571,000 at June 30, 2015 from $394,630,000 at December 31, 2014, primarily due to an increase in investment securities, offset by a decrease in loans and cash and cash equivalents. The Bank’s net loans totaled $ 265,796,000 at June 30, 2015, compared to $273,986,000 at December 31, 2014, a decrease of $8,190,000 (2.99%), primarily attributable to a decrease in indirect lending with lesser decreases in refinance loans, installment business secured loans and residential construction (non-homeowner occupied). There was also an increase in mortgage participations sold. These decreases were partially offset by increases in commercial and industrial loans and various other loan categories.

The Company’s total investment securities portfolio (investment securities available for sale) totaled $107,509,000 at June 30, 2015, a $19,516,000 (22.18%) increase from $87,993,000 at December 31, 2014. The Bank’s cash and due from banks (cash due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and federal funds sold), as of June 30, 2015, totaled $10,379,000, a decrease of $2,901,000 (21.85%) from the December 31, 2014 total of $13,280,000. The increase in investment securities was funded by the decrease in cash and cash equivalents and loans. The increase in deposits was also used to fund the investment increase.

Deposits as of June 30, 2015, totaled $348,603,000, which is an increase of $9,726,000 (2.87%) from $338,877,000 at December 31, 2014. Demand deposits as of June 30, 2015, totaled $97,759,000, which is an increase of $9,196,000 (10.38%) from $88,563,000 at December 31, 2014. NOW accounts as of June 30, 2015, totaled $30,363,000, which is an increase of $3,373,000 (12.50%) from $26,990,000 at December 31, 2014. Money market accounts as of June 30, 2015, totaled $19,432,000, which is a decrease of $1,033,000 (5.05%), from $20,465,000 at December 31, 2014. Savings deposits as of June 30, 2015, totaled $78,501,000, which is an increase of $3,528,000 (4.71%) from $74,973,000 at December 31, 2014. Certificates of deposit over $100,000 totaled $35,698,000 on June 30, 2015, which is a decrease of $420,000 (1.17%) from $36,118,000 at December 31, 2014. Other time deposits (made up of certificates of deposit less than $100,000 and individual retirement accounts) totaled $86,850,000 on June 30, 2015, which is a $4,918,000 (5.36%) decrease from the $91,768,000 total at December 31, 2014.

Asset Quality . The following tables set forth the amount of the Bank’s current, past due, and non-accrual loans by categories of loans and restructured loans, at the dates indicated.

The following table analyzes the age of past due loans, including both accruing and non-accruing loans, segregated by class of loans as of the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014.

The balances in the above charts have not been reduced by the allowance for loan loss and the unearned income on loans. For the period ending June 30, 2015, the allowance for loan loss is $3,274,000 and the unearned income is $1,114,000. For the period ending December 31, 2014, the allowance for loan loss is $3,118,000 and the unearned income is $1,127,000.