HBAN 10-Q Quarterly Report March 31, 2013 | Alphaminr
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC/MD

HBAN 10-Q Quarter ended March 31, 2013

HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC/MD
10-Qs and 10-Ks
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009
PROXIES
DEF 14A
Filed on March 6, 2025
DEF 14A
Filed on March 7, 2024
DEF 14A
Filed on March 9, 2023
DEF 14A
Filed on March 10, 2022
DEF 14A
Filed on March 12, 2021
DEF 14A
Filed on March 12, 2020
DEF 14A
Filed on March 7, 2019
DEF 14A
Filed on March 8, 2018
DEF 14A
Filed on March 9, 2017
DEF 14A
Filed on March 10, 2016
DEF 14A
Filed on March 12, 2015
DEF 14A
Filed on March 6, 2014
DEF 14A
Filed on March 7, 2013
DEF 14A
Filed on March 8, 2012
DEF 14A
Filed on March 9, 2011
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 26, 2010
10-Q 1 d527183d10q.htm FORM 10-Q FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2013

Commission File Number 1-34073

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Maryland 31-0724920

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

41 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43287

Registrant’s telephone number (614) 480-8300

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

There were 838,757,987 shares of Registrant’s common stock ($0.01 par value) outstanding on March 31, 2013.


Table of Contents

HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 58
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 59
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 60
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 61
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 62
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 63

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Overview 6
Discussion of Results of Operations 9
Risk Management and Capital:
Credit Risk 20
Market Risk 33
Liquidity Risk 36
Operational Risk 39
Compliance Risk 41
Capital 41
Fair Value 44
Business Segment Discussion 45
Additional Disclosures 56

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 127

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures 127
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings 127

Item 1A.

Risk Factors 127

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 127

Item 6.

Exhibits 128
Signatures 130

2


Table of Contents

Glossary of Acronyms and Terms

The following listing provides a comprehensive reference of common acronyms and terms used throughout the document:

2012 Form 10-K Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012
ABL Asset Based Lending
ACL Allowance for Credit Losses
AFCRE Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate
ABS Asset-Backed Securities
AFS Available-for-Sale
ALCO Asset & Liability Management Committee
ALLL Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
ARM Adjustable Rate Mortgage
ASC Accounting Standards Codification
ASU Accounting Standards Update
ATM Automated Teller Machine
AULC Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments
AVM Automated Valuation Methodology
C&I Commercial and Industrial
CapPR Capital Plan Review
CCAR Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
CDO Collateralized Debt Obligations
CDs Certificates of Deposit
CFPB Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
CMO Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
CRE Commercial Real Estate
Dodd-Frank Act Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
EPS Earnings Per Share
EVE Economic Value of Equity
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHA Federal Housing Administration
FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FICA Federal Insurance Contributions Act
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association
FRB Federal Reserve Bank
FTE Fully-Taxable Equivalent
FTP Funds Transfer Pricing
GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
HAMP Home Affordable Modification Program
HARP Home Affordable Refinance Program
HTM Held-to-Maturities
IRS Internal Revenue Service
ISE Interest Sensitive Earnings
LCR Liquidity Coverage Ratio
LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate

3


Table of Contents
LGD Loss-Given-Default
LTV Loan to Value
MBS Mortgage-Backed Security
MD&A Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area
MSR Mortgage Servicing Rights
NALs Nonaccrual Loans
NCO Net Charge-off
NIM Net interest margin
NPAs Nonperforming Assets
NPR Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
N.R. Not relevant. Denominator of calculation is a gain in the current period compared with a loss in the prior period, or vice-versa.
OCC Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OCI Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
OCR Optimal Customer Relationship
OLEM Other Loans Especially Mentioned
OREO Other Real Estate Owned
OTTI Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
PD Probability-Of-Default
Plan Huntington Bancshares Retirement Plan
Problem Loans Includes nonaccrual loans and leases (Table 13), troubled debt restructured loans (Table 14), accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more (aging analysis section of Footnote 3), and Criticized commercial loans (credit quality indicators section of Footnote 3).
REIT Real Estate Investment Trust
ROC Risk Oversight Committee
SAD Special Assets Division
SBA Small Business Administration
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
SERP Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
SRIP Supplemental Retirement Income Plan
TDR Troubled Debt Restructured Loan
U.S. Treasury U.S. Department of the Treasury
UCS Uniform Classification System
UPB Unpaid Principal Balance
USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture
VA U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs
VIE Variable Interest Entity
WGH Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending

4


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

When we refer to “we,” “our,” and “us” in this report, we mean Huntington Bancshares Incorporated and our consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates that we refer only to the parent company, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated. When we refer to the “Bank” in this report, we mean our only bank subsidiary, The Huntington National Bank, and its subsidiaries.

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

INTRODUCTION

We are a multi-state diversified regional bank holding company organized under Maryland law in 1966 and headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Through the Bank, we have 147 years of servicing the financial needs of our customers. Through our subsidiaries, we provide full-service commercial and consumer banking services, mortgage banking services, automobile financing, equipment leasing, investment management, trust services, brokerage services, customized insurance service programs, and other financial products and services. Our over 700 banking offices are located in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Selected financial services and other activities are also conducted in various other states. International banking services are available through the headquarters office in Columbus, Ohio and a limited purpose office located in the Cayman Islands and another limited purpose office located in Hong Kong. Our foreign banking activities, in total or with any individual country, are not significant.

This MD&A provides information we believe necessary for understanding our financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. The MD&A included in our 2012 Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with this MD&A as this discussion provides only material updates to the 2012 Form 10-K. This MD&A should also be read in conjunction with the financial statements, notes and other information contained in this report.

Our discussion is divided into key segments:

Executive Overview —Provides a summary of our current financial performance, and business overview, including our thoughts on the impact of the economy, legislative and regulatory initiatives, and recent industry developments. This section also provides our outlook regarding our expectations for the remainder of 2013.

Discussion of Results of Operations —Reviews financial performance from a consolidated Company perspective. It also includes a Significant Items section that summarizes key issues helpful for understanding performance trends. Key consolidated average balance sheet and income statement trends are also discussed in this section.

Risk Management and Capital —Discusses credit, market, liquidity, operational, and compliance risks, including how these are managed, as well as performance trends. It also includes a discussion of liquidity policies, how we obtain funding, and related performance. In addition, there is a discussion of guarantees and / or commitments made for items such as standby letters of credit and commitments to sell loans, and a discussion that reviews the adequacy of capital, including regulatory capital requirements.

Business Segment Discussion —Provides an overview of financial performance for each of our major business segments and provides additional discussion of trends underlying consolidated financial performance.

Additional Disclosures —Provides comments on important matters including forward-looking statements, critical accounting policies and use of significant estimates, recent accounting pronouncements and developments, and acquisitions.

A reading of each section is important to understand fully the nature of our financial performance and prospects.

5


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Summary of 2013 First Quarter Results

For the quarter, we reported net income of $151.8 million, or $0.17 per common share, compared with $167.3 million, or $0.19 per common share, in the prior quarter ( see Table 1 ).

Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income was $430.1 million for the quarter, down $9.4 million, or 2%, from the prior quarter. The decrease reflected the seasonal impact of a fewer number of calendar days in the quarter, as well as a 3 basis point decrease in NIM, partially offset by a $0.3 billion increase in average earnings assets. The primary items affecting the NIM were a 5 basis point negative impact from the mix and yield of earning assets and a 3 basis point lower benefit from noninterest-bearing funds, which were partially offset by a 5 basis point positive impact from the reduction in total funding costs.

The provision for credit losses decreased $9.9 million, or 25%, from the prior quarter. This reflected an $18.4 million, or 26%, decrease in NCOs to $51.7 million, or an annualized 0.51% of average total loans and leases, from $70.1 million, or an annualized 0.69%, in the prior quarter.

Noninterest income decreased $45.4 million, or 15%, from the prior quarter. Gain on sale of loans decreased $18.1 million, or 87%, primarily related to the prior quarter automobile loan securitization. Mortgage banking income decreased $16.5 million, or 27%, primarily due to lower origination and secondary marketing income. Lower than expected commercial customer transactions negatively impacted both capital markets revenue and service charges on commercial deposit accounts, more than offsetting the favorable impact from continued commercial customer relationship growth of 11.9% annualized during the quarter. The decrease in service charges on deposit accounts also reflects typical seasonality and the February 2013 implementation of a new posting order for consumer transaction accounts. The full-year impact from the new posting order, which was incorporated into previous 2013 guidance, is estimated to be between $25 million and $30 million. Consumer household checking account growth of 11.8% annualized during the quarter partially offset the unfavorable impact from the new posting order.

Noninterest expense decreased $27.8 million, or 6%, from the prior quarter. Professional services decreased $15.3 million, 68%, primarily reflecting the decline in regulatory-related expenses. Other expenses decreased $8.2 million, or 20%, due to lower litigation and travel expenses, while marketing decreased $5.5 million, or 33%, as the latest advertising campaign did not launch until late in the quarter. Personnel costs increased $4.9 million, or 2%, reflecting approximately $8 million of costs related to the annual payroll tax resets, partially offset by approximately $5 million in lower commission expense due to lower levels of capital markets and other customer-related activities.

The period-end ACL as a percentage of total loans and leases decreased to 1.91% from 1.99% in the prior quarter. The ACL as a percentage of period end NALs increased 8 percentage points to 207%. NALs declined by $27.3 million, or 7%, to $380.3 million, or 0.92% of total loans. The decreases primarily reflect continued improvement in commercial NALs.

The tangible common equity to tangible asset ratio increased to 8.92% from 8.76% in the prior quarter. Our Tier 1 common risk-based capital ratio at quarter end was 10.62%, up from 10.48% in the prior quarter. The regulatory Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio at March 31, 2013 was 12.16%, up from 12.02%, at December 31, 2012. All capital ratios were impacted by the repurchase of 4.7 million common shares over the quarter at an average price per share of $7.07.

The Federal Reserve completed its review of our January 2013 capital plan submission and did not object to our proposed capital actions. This allows us to increase our quarterly common stock dividend to $0.05 per common share and gives us the potential to repurchase up to $227.0 million of common stock through the first quarter of 2014. Reinvesting excess capital to organically grow the business remains our priority. Importantly, dividends and share repurchases provide us additional means of creating long-term shareholder value.

Business Overview

General

Our general business objectives are: (1) grow net interest income and fee income, (2) increase cross-sell and share-of-wallet across all business segments, (3) improve efficiency ratio, (4) continue to strengthen risk management, including sustained improvement in credit metrics, and (5) maintain strong capital and liquidity positions.

The year is off to a solid start, and the first quarter results continue to demonstrate that our strategies are working. We have differentiated ourselves by investing in innovative products and customer services, including our Fair Play approach. As a result, we are continuing to see double digit household growth and recognition by national entities of our customer service execution. Our growth has occurred in a challenging economic and regulatory environment. While some companies are hesitant to invest in light of the uncertain economy, we will continue to look for areas where we can improve efficiency, continue to deliver positive operating leverage, and selectively invest in our businesses in order to drive our long-term profitability.

6


Table of Contents

Economy

The FRB of Philadelphia Coincident Economic Activity Index, a proxy for overall economic growth, indicates the recoveries in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana have been stronger than in the overall nation since the recession ended in June 2009. Led by Indiana and Michigan, five of our six footprint states are forecasted to grow faster than the overall nation over the six months beginning in March 2013. For the 12 months ended January 31, 2013, home prices rose 13.9% in the Detroit MSA, well above the S&P Case Shiller index for the nation, which rose 8.1%. In aggregate, housing markets in our footprint states have mirrored the national recovery trend. Firming of natural gas prices and a gradual improvement in the global economy should also provide some additional support to economic growth as the year progresses.

Legislative and Regulatory

Regulatory reforms continue to be adopted which impose additional restrictions on current business practices. Recent items affecting us include the Federal Reserve’s Capital Plan Review and a recently issued CFPB bulletin.

Capital Plans Rule / Supervisory and Company-Run Stress Test Requirements – During 2012, we participated in the Federal Reserve’s Capital Plan Review (CapPR) process and made our capital plan submission in January 2013. On March 14, 2013, we announced that the Federal Reserve had completed its review of our capital plan submission and did not object to our proposed capital actions. The capital plan review process included reviews of our internal capital planning process and our plans to make capital distributions, such as dividend payments or stock repurchases, as well as a stress test requirement designed to test our capital adequacy throughout times of economic and financial stress.

CFPB Issues Bulletin on Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act – On March 21, 2013, the CFPB issued a bulletin to provide guidance about compliance with requirements of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) for indirect auto lenders that permit auto dealers to increase consumer interest rates and that compensate dealers with a share of the increased interest revenues. The Bulletin states that indirect auto lenders may be liable for pricing disparities on a prohibited basis within the lender’s portfolio arising from dealer markup and compensation policies. The Bulletin further states that indirect auto lenders should take steps to ensure they are operating in compliance with ECOA. Those steps may include, but are not limited to, eliminating dealer pricing discretion or, if dealer pricing discretion is retained, imposing controls on dealer pricing discretion, testing the lender’s portfolio, monitoring dealer compliance, and when unexplained disparities on prohibited bases are found, addressing the effects of such discretion through corrective action against dealers and remuneration of affected consumers. Our indirect auto lending business is subject to this Bulletin, and we are currently evaluating this regulatory guidance to ensure it is appropriately incorporated into the operation and conduct of our business.

Expectations

We are starting to see positive signs in both our business and consumer customer bases as the economic recovery progresses. We believe the soundness of our strategy will continue to drive growth and improve our profitability. Our retail customers and our mortgage lending businesses are benefiting from recovering housing markets. Although a recent uptick among our business customers of drawing down cash balances to support working capital needs and to fund new projects has negative near-term implications on our balance sheet, we are encouraged by this activity as it suggests improving confidence among business owners and implies a more robust long-term economic outlook. Competition continues to pressure asset yields and more recently loan structure, but we will remain disciplined as we manage our aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile.

Net interest income is expected to modestly grow over the course of 2013, as we anticipate an increase in total loans, excluding the impact of any future loan securitizations. However, those benefits to net interest income are expected to be mostly offset by downward NIM pressure. 2013 NIM is not expected to fall below the mid 3.30%’s due to continued deposit repricing and mix shift opportunities while maintaining a disciplined approach to loan pricing.

The C&I portfolio is expected to continue to see growth in 2013, although we expect growth will be more heavily weighted to the back half of the year as the economic recovery progresses. Our C&I sales pipeline remains robust with much of this reflecting the positive impact from our investments in specialized commercial verticals, focused OCR sales process and continued support of middle market and small business lending. While on-balance sheet loans are expected to increase, we will continue to evaluate the use of automobile loan securitizations due to our expectation of continued strong levels of originations. We currently anticipate one securitization in the second half of 2013. Residential mortgages and home equity loan balances are expected to increase modestly. CRE loans likely will experience declines from current levels but are expected to remain in the $5.0 billion range.

7


Table of Contents

Excluding potential future automobile loan securitizations, we anticipate the increase in total loans will modestly outpace growth in total deposits. This reflects our continued focus on the overall cost of funds, the continued shift towards low- and no-cost demand deposits and money market deposit accounts.

Noninterest income over the course of the year, excluding the impact of any automobile loan sales and any net MSR impact, is expected to be at similar levels as 2012. The anticipated slowdown in mortgage banking activity is expected to be offset by continued growth in new customers, increased contribution from higher cross-sell, and the continued maturation of our previous strategic investments.

Noninterest expense in the 2013 first quarter was below our expected average quarterly run rate for the year. The second quarter is expected to increase due to higher commission expense related to a more normal level of commercial customer-related activity, annual merit increases, higher marketing expense as we continue the launch our new media campaign, and equipment related to our continued in-store expansion. We remain committed to posting positive operating leverage in 2013 as growth in total revenue is expected to outpace total expense growth.

Overall credit quality is expected to experience continued improvement, and NCOs while in the normalized range this quarter, are expected to remain volatile but reach normalized levels by the end of 2013. The level of provision for credit losses was at the low end of our long-term expectation, and we expect some quarterly volatility within each of the loan categories given the absolute low level of the provision for credit losses and the uncertain and uneven nature of the economic recovery.

We anticipate an effective tax rate for the remainder of 2013 to be in the range of 25% to 28%, primarily reflecting the impact of tax-exempt income, tax advantaged investments, and general business credits.

8


Table of Contents

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This section provides a review of financial performance from a consolidated perspective. It also includes a “Significant Items” section that summarizes key issues important for a complete understanding of performance trends. Key Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Unaudited Condensed Statement of Income trends are discussed. All earnings per share data are reported on a diluted basis. For additional insight on financial performance, please read this section in conjunction with the “Business Segment Discussion.”

9


Table of Contents

Table 1 - Selected Quarterly Income Statement Data (1)

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

First Fourth Third Second First

Interest income

$ 465,319 $ 478,995 $ 483,787 $ 487,544 $ 479,937

Interest expense

41,149 44,940 53,489 58,582 62,728

Net interest income

424,170 434,055 430,298 428,962 417,209

Provision for credit losses

29,592 39,458 37,004 36,520 34,406

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

394,578 394,597 393,294 392,442 382,803

Service charges on deposit accounts

60,883 68,083 67,806 65,998 60,292

Mortgage banking income

45,248 61,711 44,614 38,349 46,418

Trust services

31,160 31,388 29,689 29,914 30,906

Electronic banking

20,713 21,011 22,135 20,514 18,630

Brokerage income

17,995 17,415 16,526 19,025 19,260

Insurance income

19,252 17,268 17,792 17,384 18,875

Gain on sale of loans

2,616 20,690 6,591 4,131 26,770

Bank owned life insurance income

13,442 13,767 14,371 13,967 13,937

Capital markets fees

8,051 12,918 11,805 13,455 9,982

Securities gains (losses)

(509 ) 863 4,169 350 (613 )

Other income

33,358 32,537 25,569 30,732 40,863

Total noninterest income

252,209 297,651 261,067 253,819 285,320

Personnel costs

258,895 253,952 247,709 243,034 243,498

Outside data processing and other services

49,265 48,699 50,396 48,568 42,592

Net occupancy

30,114 29,008 27,599 25,474 29,079

Equipment

24,880 26,580 25,950 24,872 25,545

Deposit and other insurance expense

15,490 16,327 15,534 15,731 20,738

Professional services

7,192 22,514 17,510 15,037 10,697

Marketing

10,971 16,456 16,842 17,396 13,569

Amortization of intangibles

10,320 11,647 11,431 11,940 11,531

OREO and foreclosure expense

2,666 4,233 4,982 4,106 4,950

Loss (Gain) on early extinguishment of debt

1,782 (2,580 )

Other expense

33,000 41,212 38,568 40,691 60,477

Total noninterest expense

442,793 470,628 458,303 444,269 462,676

Income before income taxes

203,994 221,620 196,058 201,992 205,447

Provision for income taxes

52,214 54,341 28,291 49,286 52,177

Net income

$ 151,780 $ 167,279 $ 167,767 $ 152,706 $ 153,270

Dividends on preferred shares

7,970 7,973 7,983 7,984 8,049

Net income applicable to common shares

$ 143,810 $ 159,306 $ 159,784 $ 144,722 $ 145,221

Average common shares—basic

841,103 847,220 857,871 862,261 864,499

Average common shares—diluted

848,708 853,306 863,588 867,551 869,164

Net income per common share—basic

$ 0.17 $ 0.19 $ 0.19 $ 0.17 $ 0.17

Net income per common share—diluted

0.17 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.17

Cash dividends declared per common share

0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04

Return on average total assets

1.10 % 1.19 % 1.19 % 1.10 % 1.13 %

Return on average common shareholders’ equity

10.7 11.6 11.9 11.1 11.4

Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (2)

12.4 13.5 13.9 13.1 13.5

Net interest margin (3)

3.42 3.45 3.38 3.42 3.40

Efficiency ratio (4)

63.3 62.3 64.5 62.8 63.8

Effective tax rate

25.6 24.5 14.4 24.4 25.4

Revenue—FTE

Net interest income

$ 424,170 $ 434,055 $ 430,298 $ 428,962 $ 417,209

FTE adjustment

5,923 5,470 5,254 5,747 3,935

Net interest income (3)

430,093 439,525 435,552 434,709 421,144

Noninterest income

252,209 297,651 261,067 253,819 285,320

Total revenue (3)

$ 682,302 $ 737,176 $ 696,619 $ 688,528 $ 706,464

(1)

Comparisons for presented periods are impacted by a number of factors. Refer to the “Significant Items” for additional discussion regarding these key factors.

10


Table of Contents
(2)

Net income excluding expense for amortization of intangibles for the period divided by average tangible common shareholders’ equity. Average tangible common shareholders’ equity equals average total common shareholders’ equity less average intangible assets and goodwill. Expense for amortization of intangibles and average intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.

(3)

On a fully-taxable equivalent (FTE) basis assuming a 35% tax rate

(4)

Noninterest expense less amortization of intangibles divided by the sum of FTE net interest income and noninterest income excluding securities gains.

Significant Items

Definition of Significant Items

From time-to-time, revenue, expenses, or taxes, are impacted by items judged by us to be outside of ordinary banking activities and / or by items that, while they may be associated with ordinary banking activities, are so unusually large that their outsized impact is believed by us at that time to be infrequent or short-term in nature. We refer to such items as Significant Items. Most often, these Significant Items result from factors originating outside the company; e.g., regulatory actions / assessments, windfall gains, changes in accounting principles, one-time tax assessments / refunds, litigation actions, etc. In other cases, they may result from our decisions associated with significant corporate actions outside of the ordinary course of business; e.g., merger / restructuring charges, recapitalization actions, goodwill impairment, etc.

Even though certain revenue and expense items are naturally subject to more volatility than others due to changes in market and economic environment conditions, as a general rule volatility alone does not define a Significant Item. For example, changes in the provision for credit losses, gains / losses from investment activities, asset valuation writedowns, etc., reflect ordinary banking activities and are, therefore, typically excluded from consideration as a Significant Item.

We believe the disclosure of Significant Items provides a better understanding of our performance and trends to ascertain which of such items, if any, to include or exclude from an analysis of our performance; i.e., within the context of determining how that performance differed from expectations, as well as how, if at all, to adjust estimates of future performance accordingly. To this end, we adopted a practice of listing Significant Items in our external disclosure documents; e.g., earnings press releases, investor presentations, Forms 10-Q and 10-K.

Significant Items for any particular period are not intended to be a complete list of items that may materially impact current or future period performance.

Significant Items Influencing Financial Performance Comparisons

Earnings comparisons were impacted by the Significant Items summarized below:

1. Litigation Reserve. During the 2012 first quarter, a $23.5 million addition to litigation reserves was recorded in other noninterest expense. This resulted in a negative impact of $0.02 per common share.

2. Bargain Purchase Gain. During the 2012 first quarter, an $11.4 million bargain purchase gain associated with the FDIC-assisted Fidelity Bank acquisition was recorded in noninterest income. This resulted in a positive impact of $0.01 per common share.

11


Table of Contents

The following table reflects the earnings impact of the above-mentioned Significant Items for periods affected by this Results of Operations discussion:

Table 2 - Significant Items Influencing Earnings Performance Comparison

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 March 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

After-tax EPS (2) After-tax EPS (2) After-tax EPS (2)

Net income

$ 151,780 $ 167,279 $ 153,270

Earnings per share, after-tax

$ 0.17 $ 0.19 $ 0.17

Change from prior quarter—$

(0.02 ) 0.03

Change from prior quarter—%

(11 )% % 21 %

Change from year-ago—$

$ $ 0.05 $ 0.03

Change from year-ago—%

% 36 % 21 %

Significant Items—favorable (unfavorable) impact:

Earnings (1) EPS (2) Earnings (1) EPS (2) Earnings (1) EPS (2)

Bargain purchase gain

$ $ $ $ $ 11,409 0.01

Litigation reserves addition

(23,500 ) (0.02 )

(1)

Pretax unless otherwise noted.

(2)

After-tax.

Net Interest Income / Average Balance Sheet

The following tables detail the change in our average balance sheet and the net interest margin:

12


Table of Contents

Table 3 - Consolidated Quarterly Average Balance Sheets

Average Balances Change
2013 2012 1Q13 vs. 1Q12

(dollar amounts in millions)

First Fourth Third Second (2) First Amount Percent

Assets:

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

$ 72 $ 73 $ 82 $ 124 $ 100 $ (28 ) (28 )%

Loans held for sale

709 840 1,829 410 1,265 (556 ) (44 )

Securities:

Available-for-sale and other securities:

Taxable

6,964 7,131 8,014 8,285 8,171 (1,207 ) (15 )

Tax-exempt

549 492 423 387 404 145 36

Total available-for-sale and other securities

7,513 7,623 8,437 8,672 8,575 (1,062 ) (12 )

Trading account securities

85 97 66 54 50 35 70

Held-to-maturity securities—taxable

1,717 1,652 796 611 632 1,085 172

Total securities

9,315 9,372 9,299 9,337 9,257 58 1

Loans and leases: (1)

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

16,954 16,507 16,343 16,094 14,824 2,130 14

Commercial real estate:

Construction

598 576 569 584 598

Commercial

4,694 4,897 5,153 5,491 5,254 (560 ) (11 )

Commercial real estate

5,292 5,473 5,722 6,075 5,852 (560 ) (10 )

Total commercial

22,246 21,980 22,065 22,169 20,676 1,570 8

Consumer:

Automobile

4,833 4,486 4,065 4,985 4,576 257 6

Home equity

8,395 8,345 8,369 8,310 8,234 161 2

Residential mortgage

4,978 5,155 5,177 5,253 5,174 (196 ) (4 )

Other consumer

412 431 444 462 485 (73 ) (15 )

Total consumer

18,618 18,417 18,055 19,010 18,469 149 1

Total loans and leases

40,864 40,397 40,120 41,179 39,145 1,719 4

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(772 ) (783 ) (855 ) (908 ) (961 ) 189 (20 )

Net loans and leases

40,092 39,614 39,265 40,271 38,184 1,908 5

Total earning assets

50,960 50,682 51,330 51,050 49,767 1,193 2

Cash and due from banks

904 1,459 960 928 1,012 (108 ) (11 )

Intangible assets

571 581 597 609 613 (42 ) (7 )

All other assets

4,065 4,115 4,106 4,158 4,225 (160 ) (4 )

Total assets

$ 55,728 $ 56,054 $ 56,138 $ 55,837 $ 54,656 $ 1,072 2 %

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:

Deposits:

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 12,165 $ 13,121 $ 12,329 $ 12,064 $ 11,273 $ 892 8 %

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

5,977 5,843 5,814 5,939 5,646 331 6

Total demand deposits

18,142 18,964 18,143 18,003 16,919 1,223 7

Money market deposits

15,045 14,749 14,515 13,182 13,141 1,904 14

Savings and other domestic deposits

5,083 4,960 4,975 4,978 4,817 266 6

Core certificates of deposit

5,346 5,637 6,131 6,618 6,510 (1,164 ) (18 )

Total core deposits

43,616 44,310 43,764 42,781 41,387 2,229 5

Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more

360 359 300 298 347 13 4

Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs

1,697 1,756 1,878 1,421 1,301 396 30

Deposits in foreign offices

340 342 356 357 430 (90 ) (21 )

Total deposits

46,013 46,767 46,298 44,857 43,465 2,548 6

Short-term borrowings

762 1,012 1,329 1,391 1,512 (750 ) (50 )

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

686 42 107 626 419 267 64

Subordinated notes and other long-term debt

1,348 1,374 1,638 2,251 2,652 (1,304 ) (49 )

Total interest-bearing liabilities

36,644 36,074 37,043 37,061 36,775 (131 )

All other liabilities

1,085 1,017 1,035 1,094 1,116 (31 ) (3 )

Shareholders’ equity

5,834 5,842 5,731 5,618 5,492 342 6

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 55,728 $ 56,054 $ 56,138 $ 55,837 $ 54,656 $ 1,072 2 %

(1) For purposes of this analysis, NALs are reflected in the average balances of loans.
(2) The acquisition of Fidelity Bank on March 30, 2012, contributed to the increase in average loans and deposits

13


Table of Contents

Table 4 - Consolidated Quarterly Net Interest Margin Analysis

Average Rates (2)

Fully-taxable equivalent basis (1)

2013 2012
First Fourth Third Second First

Assets

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

0.16 % 0.28 % 0.21 % 0.31 % 0.05 %

Loans held for sale

3.22 3.18 3.18 3.46 3.80

Securities:

Available-for-sale and other securities:

Taxable

2.31 2.32 2.29 2.33 2.39

Tax-exempt

3.96 4.03 4.15 4.23 4.17

Total available-for-sale and other securities

2.43 2.43 2.39 2.41 2.47

Trading account securities

0.50 1.01 1.07 1.64 1.65

Held-to-maturity securities—taxable

2.29 2.24 2.81 2.97 2.98

Total securities

2.39 2.38 2.41 2.45 2.50

Loans and leases: (3)

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

3.83 3.88 3.90 3.99 4.01

Commercial real estate:

Construction

4.05 4.13 3.84 3.66 3.85

Commercial

4.00 4.20 3.85 3.93 3.82

Commercial real estate

4.01 4.19 3.85 3.89 3.82

Total commercial

3.87 3.96 3.89 3.97 3.96

Consumer:

Automobile

4.28 4.52 4.87 4.68 4.87

Home equity

4.20 4.24 4.27 4.30 4.30

Residential mortgage

3.97 4.07 4.02 4.14 4.17

Other consumer

7.05 7.16 7.16 7.42 7.47

Total consumer

4.22 4.33 4.40 4.43 4.49

Total loans and leases

4.03 4.13 4.12 4.18 4.21

Total earning assets

3.75 % 3.80 % 3.79 % 3.89 % 3.91 %

Liabilities

Deposits:

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

% % % % %

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

0.04 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.06

Total demand deposits

0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

Money market deposits

0.23 0.27 0.33 0.30 0.26

Savings and other domestic deposits

0.30 0.33 0.37 0.39 0.45

Core certificates of deposit

1.19 1.21 1.25 1.38 1.60

Total core deposits

0.37 0.41 0.47 0.50 0.54

Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more

0.52 0.61 0.68 0.66 0.68

Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs

0.67 0.71 0.71 0.75 0.79

Deposits in foreign offices

0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.18

Total deposits

0.38 0.42 0.48 0.51 0.55

Short-term borrowings

0.12 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.16

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

0.18 1.20 0.50 0.21 0.21

Subordinated notes and other long-term debt

2.54 2.55 2.91 2.83 2.74

Total interest-bearing liabilities

0.45 % 0.50 % 0.58 % 0.63 % 0.68 %

Net interest rate spread

3.30 % 3.30 % 3.21 % 3.26 % 3.23 %

Impact of noninterest-bearing funds on margin

0.12 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.17

Net interest margin

3.42 % 3.45 % 3.38 % 3.42 % 3.40 %

(1)

FTE yields are calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.

(2)

Loan and lease and deposit average rates include impact of applicable derivatives, non-deferrable fees, and amortized deferred fees.

(3)

For purposes of this analysis, NALs are reflected in the average balances of loans.

14


Table of Contents

Table 5 - Average Loans/Leases and Deposits

First Quarter Fourth Quarter 1Q13 vs 1Q12 1Q13 vs 4Q12

(dollar amounts in millions)

2013 2012 2012 Amount Percent Amount Percent

Loans/Leases:

Commercial and industrial

$ 16,954 $ 14,824 $ 16,507 $ 2,130 14 % $ 447 3 %

Commercial real estate

5,292 5,852 5,473 (560 ) (10 ) (181 ) (3 )

Total commercial

22,246 20,676 21,980 1,570 8 266 1

Automobile

4,833 4,576 4,486 257 6 347 8

Home equity

8,395 8,234 8,345 161 2 50 1

Residential mortgage

4,978 5,174 5,155 (196 ) (4 ) (177 ) (3 )

Other loans

412 485 431 (73 ) (15 ) (19 ) (4 )

Total consumer

18,618 18,469 18,417 149 1 201 1

Total loans and leases

$ 40,864 $ 39,145 $ 40,397 $ 1,719 4 % $ 467 1 %

Deposits:

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 12,165 $ 11,273 $ 13,121 $ 892 8 % $ (956 ) (7 )%

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

5,977 5,646 5,843 331 6 134 2

Total demand deposits

18,142 16,919 18,964 1,223 7 (822 ) (4 )

Money market deposits

15,045 13,141 14,749 1,904 14 296 2

Savings and other domestic time deposits

5,083 4,817 4,960 266 6 123 2

Core certificates of deposit

5,346 6,510 5,637 (1,164 ) (18 ) (291 ) (5 )

Total core deposits

43,616 41,387 44,310 2,229 5 (694 ) (2 )

Other deposits

2,397 2,078 2,457 319 15 (60 ) (2 )

Total deposits

$ 46,013 $ 43,465 $ 46,767 $ 2,548 6 % $ (754 ) (2 )%

2013 First Quarter versus 2012 First Quarter

Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income increased $8.9 million, or 2%, from the year-ago quarter. This reflected a $1.2 billion, or 2%, increase in average total earning assets and a 2 basis point increase in the FTE net interest margin. The primary items impacting the increase in the net interest margin were:

20 basis point impact from the reduction in the cost of subordinated notes and other long-term debt, reflecting the benefit of the redemption of $230 million of trust preferred securities in 2012.

17 basis point positive impact from the reduction in total deposit costs.

Partially offset by:

18 basis point negative impact from the mix and yield of loans.

11 basis point negative impact from the yield on total securities.

The $1.7 billion, or 4%, increase in average total loans and leases primarily reflected:

$2.1 billion, or 14%, increase in C&I loans. This reflected the continued growth across most business lines with particularly strong growth in equipment finance, dealer floorplan, and health care.

$0.3 billion, or 6%, increase in automobile loans. No automobile loans were transferred to held for sale during the 2013 first quarter as the only currently planned securitization is expected to be in the second half of 2013.

Partially offset by:

$0.6 billion, or 10%, decrease in CRE loans. This reflected continued runoff of the noncore and core portfolios as we balanced acceptable returns for new core origination against internal concentration limits and increased competition, particularly pricing, for high quality developers and projects.

15


Table of Contents

$0.2 billion, or 4%, decrease in residential mortgages due to payoffs and the mix of originations shifted towards more saleable loans.

The $2.2 billion, or 5%, increase in average core deposits from the year-ago quarter reflected:

$1.9 billion, or 14%, increase in money market deposits.

$1.2 billion, or 7%, increase in total demand deposits.

Partially offset by:

$1.2 billion, or 18%, decrease in core certificates of deposit.

2013 First Quarter versus 2012 Fourth Quarter

Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income decreased $9.4 million, or 2%, from the last quarter reflecting the seasonal impact of a fewer number of calendar days in the quarter, as well as a 3 basis point decrease in NIM, partially offset by a $0.3 billion increase in average earnings assets. The primary items affecting the NIM were:

5 basis point negative impact from the mix and yield of earning assets.

3 basis point lower benefit from noninterest bearing funds.

Partially offset by:

5 basis point positive impact from the reduction in total funding costs.

The $0.5 billion, or 1%, increase in average total loans and leases from the 2012 fourth quarter reflected:

$0.4 billion, or 3%, increase in commercial and industrial loans.

$0.3 billion, or 8%, increase in automobile loans.

Partially offset by:

$0.2 billion, or 3%, decrease in commercial real estate loans.

$0.2 billion, or 3%, decrease in residential mortgages.

The $0.7 billion, or 2%, decrease in average total core deposits from the 2012 fourth quarter reflected:

$1.0 billion, or 7%, decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits primarily reflecting our continued effort to reduce collateralized deposits.

Partially offset by:

$0.3 billion, or 2%, increase in money market deposits.

16


Table of Contents

Provision for Credit Losses

(This section should be read in conjunction with the Credit Risk section.)

The provision for credit losses is the expense necessary to maintain the ALLL and the AULC at levels appropriate to absorb our estimate of inherent credit losses in the loan and lease portfolio and the portfolio of unfunded loan commitments and letters-of-credit.

The provision for credit losses for the 2013 first quarter declined $9.9 million, or 25%, from the prior quarter and declined $4.8 million, or 14%, from the year-ago quarter. The current quarter’s provision for credit losses was $22.1 million less than total NCOs. (See Credit Quality discussion). Given the absolute low level of the provision for credit losses and the uncertain and uneven nature of the economic recovery, some degree of volatility on a quarter to quarter basis is expected.

Noninterest Income

(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 2.)

The following table reflects noninterest income for each of the past five quarters:

Table 6 - Noninterest Income

2013 2012 1Q13 vs 1Q12 1Q13 vs 4Q12

(dollar amounts in thousands)

First Fourth Third Second First Amount Percent Amount Percent

Service charges on deposit accounts

$ 60,883 $ 68,083 $ 67,806 $ 65,998 $ 60,292 $ 591 1 % $ (7,200 ) (11 )%

Mortgage banking income

45,248 61,711 44,614 38,349 46,418 (1,170 ) (3 ) (16,463 ) (27 )

Trust services

31,160 31,388 29,689 29,914 30,906 254 1 (228 ) (1 )

Electronic banking

20,713 21,011 22,135 20,514 18,630 2,083 11 (298 ) (1 )

Brokerage income

17,995 17,415 16,526 19,025 19,260 (1,265 ) (7 ) 580 3

Insurance income

19,252 17,268 17,792 17,384 18,875 377 2 1,984 11

Gain on sale of loans

2,616 20,690 6,591 4,131 26,770 (24,154 ) (90 ) (18,074 ) (87 )

Bank owned life insurance income

13,442 13,767 14,371 13,967 13,937 (495 ) (4 ) (325 ) (2 )

Capital markets fees

8,051 12,918 11,805 13,455 9,982 (1,931 ) (19 ) (4,867 ) (38 )

Securities gains (losses)

(509 ) 863 4,169 350 (613 ) 104 (17 ) (1,372 ) (159 )

Other income

33,358 32,537 25,569 30,732 40,863 (7,505 ) (18 ) 821 3

Total noninterest income

$ 252,209 $ 297,651 $ 261,067 $ 253,819 $ 285,320 $ (33,111 ) (12 )% $ (45,442 ) (15 )%

2013 First Quarter versus 2012 First Quarter

The $33.1 million, or 12%, decrease in total noninterest income from the year-ago quarter reflected:

$24.2 million, or 90%, decrease in gain on sale of loans, primarily related to the prior year’s automobile loan securitization.

$7.5 million, or 18%, decrease in other income related to the prior year’s $11.4 million bargain purchase gain from the FDIC-assisted Fidelity Bank acquisition and a $2.7 million decrease in operating lease income. 2013 first quarter other income included a $7.6 million gain on the sale of Low Income Housing Tax Credit investments.

2013 First Quarter versus 2012 Fourth Quarter

The $45.4 million, or 15%, decrease in total noninterest income from the prior quarter reflected:

$18.1 million, or 87%, decrease in gain on sale of loans, primarily related to prior quarter’s automobile loan securitization.

$16.5 million, or 27%, decrease in mortgage banking income, primarily related to lower origination and secondary marketing income.

$7.2 million, or 11%, decrease in service charges on deposit accounts reflect typical seasonality and the February implementation of a new posting order for consumer transaction accounts.

$4.9 million, or 38%, decrease in capital market activity. Lower than expected commercial customer transactions negatively impacted both capital markets revenue and service charges on commercial deposit accounts, more than offsetting the favorable impact from continued growth in total customer relationships.

17


Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense

(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 1.)

The following table reflects noninterest expense for each of the past five quarters:

Table 7 - Noninterest Expense

2013 2012 1Q13 vs 1Q12 1Q13 vs 4Q12

(dollar amounts in thousands)

First Fourth Third Second First Amount Percent Amount Percent

Personnel costs

$ 258,895 $ 253,952 $ 247,709 $ 243,034 $ 243,498 $ 15,397 6 % $ 4,943 2 %

Outside data processing and other services

49,265 48,699 50,396 48,568 42,592 6,673 16 566 1

Net occupancy

30,114 29,008 27,599 25,474 29,079 1,035 4 1,106 4

Equipment

24,880 26,580 25,950 24,872 25,545 (665 ) (3 ) (1,700 ) (6 )

Deposit and other insurance expense

15,490 16,327 15,534 15,731 20,738 (5,248 ) (25 ) (837 ) (5 )

Professional services

7,192 22,514 17,510 15,037 10,697 (3,505 ) (33 ) (15,322 ) (68 )

Marketing

10,971 16,456 16,842 17,396 13,569 (2,598 ) (19 ) (5,485 ) (33 )

Amortization of intangibles

10,320 11,647 11,431 11,940 11,531 (1,211 ) (11 ) (1,327 ) (11 )

OREO and foreclosure expense

2,666 4,233 4,982 4,106 4,950 (2,284 ) (46 ) (1,567 ) (37 )

Loss (Gain) on early extinguishment of debt

1,782 (2,580 )

Other expense

33,000 41,212 38,568 40,691 60,477 (27,477 ) (45 ) (8,212 ) (20 )

Total noninterest expense

$ 442,793 $ 470,628 $ 458,303 $ 444,269 $ 462,676 $ (19,883 ) (4 )% $ (27,835 ) (6 )%

Number of employees (full-time equivalent), at period-end

12,052 11,806 11,731 11,417 11,166 886 8 % 246 2 %

2013 First Quarter versus 2012 First Quarter

The $19.9 million, or 4%, decrease in total noninterest expense from the year-ago quarter reflected:

$27.5 million, or 45%, decrease in other expense, reflecting a $2.1 million, or 73%, decrease to $0.7 million in operating lease expense as the automobile lease portfolio continues to run off and is expected to be essentially zero by the end of the year. The year ago quarter included a $23.5 million addition to litigation reserves.

$5.2 million, or 25%, decrease in deposit and other insurance expense, reflecting lower insurance premiums.

$3.5 million, or 33%, decrease in professional services, reflecting a decline in legal and outside consultant expenses.

Partially offset by:

$15.4 million, or 6%, increase in personnel costs, reflecting an increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees as well as higher salaries and benefits.

$6.7 million, or 16%, increase in outside data processing and other services primarily related to continued IT infrastructure investments.

2013 First Quarter versus 2012 Fourth Quarter

The $27.8 million, or 6%, decrease in total noninterest expense from the prior quarter reflected:

$15.3 million, or 68%, decrease in professional costs, primarily reflecting the decline in regulatory-related expense.

$8.2 million, or 20%, decrease in other expenses due to lower litigation and travel expense.

$5.5 million, or 33%, decrease in the marketing, as the latest advertising campaign did not launch until late in the quarter.

18


Table of Contents

Partially offset by:

$4.9 million, or 2%, increase in personnel costs, reflecting approximately $8 million related to the annual payroll tax resets, partially offset by approximately $5 million in lower commission expense due to lower levels of capital markets and other customer-related activities.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes in the 2013 first quarter was $52.2 million. This compared with a provision for income taxes of $54.3 million in the 2012 fourth quarter and $52.2 million in the 2012 first quarter. All three quarters included the benefits from tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments, and general business credits. At March 31, 2013, we had a net federal deferred tax asset of $116.9 million and a net state deferred tax asset of $37.4 million. Based on both positive and negative evidence and our level of forecasted future taxable income, there was no impairment to the deferred tax asset at March 31, 2013. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there was no disallowed deferred tax asset for regulatory capital purposes.

We file income tax returns with the IRS and various state, city, and foreign jurisdictions. Federal income tax audits have been completed for tax years through 2009. We have appealed certain proposed adjustments resulting from the IRS examination of our 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 tax returns. We believe the tax positions taken related to such proposed adjustments are correct and supported by applicable statutes, regulations, and judicial authority, and intend to vigorously defend them. In 2011, we entered into discussions with the Appeals Division of the IRS for the 2006 and 2007 tax returns. It is possible the ultimate resolution of the proposed adjustments, if unfavorable, may be material to the results of operations in the period it occurs. Nevertheless, although no assurances can be given, we believe the resolution of these examinations will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position. In the current quarter, the IRS began an examination of our 2010 and 2011 consolidated federal income tax returns. Various state and other jurisdictions remain open to examination, including Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Illinois.

19


Table of Contents

RISK MANAGEMENT AND CAPITAL

Risk awareness, identification and assessment, reporting, and active management are key elements in overall risk management. We manage risk to an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile through a control framework and by monitoring and responding to identified potential risks. Controls include, among others, effective segregation of duties, access, authorization and reconciliation procedures, as well as staff education and a disciplined assessment process.

We identify primary risks, and the sources of those risks, within each business unit. We utilize Risk and Control Self-Assessments (RCSA) to identify exposure risks. Through this RCSA process, we continually assess the effectiveness of controls associated with the identified risks, regularly monitor risk profiles and material exposure to losses, and identify stress events and scenarios to which we may be exposed. Our chief risk officer is responsible for ensuring that appropriate systems of controls are in place for managing and monitoring risk across the Company. Potential risk concerns are shared with the Risk Management Committee, Risk Oversight Committee, and the board of directors, as appropriate. Our internal audit department performs on-going independent reviews of the risk management process and ensures the adequacy of documentation. The results of these reviews are reported regularly to the audit committee and board of directors.

We believe that our primary risk exposures are credit, market, liquidity, operational, and compliance oriented. More information on risk can be found in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A of our 2012 Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC. Additionally, the MD&A included in our 2012 Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with this MD&A as this discussion provides only material updates to the 2012 Form 10-K. Our definition, philosophy, and approach to risk management have not materially changed from the discussion presented in the 2012 Form 10-K.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a counterparty is not able to meet the agreed upon terms of the financial obligation. The majority of our credit risk is associated with lending activities, as the acceptance and management of credit risk is central to profitable lending. We also have significant credit risk associated with our available-for-sale and other investment and held-to-maturity securities portfolios (see Note 4 and Note 5 of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) . We engage with other financial counterparties for a variety of purposes including investing, asset and liability management, mortgage banking, and for trading activities. While there is credit risk associated with derivative activity, we believe this exposure is minimal.

We continue to focus on the identification, monitoring, and managing of our credit risk. In addition to the traditional credit risk mitigation strategies of credit policies and processes, market risk management activities, and portfolio diversification, we use additional quantitative measurement capabilities utilizing external data sources, enhanced use of modeling technology, and internal stress testing processes. Our portfolio management resources demonstrate our commitment to maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile. In our efforts to continue to identify risk mitigation techniques, we have focused on product design features, origination policies, and treatment strategies for delinquent or stressed borrowers.

Loan and Lease Credit Exposure Mix

At March 31, 2013, loans and leases totaled $41.3 billion, representing a $0.6 billion, or 1%, increase compared to $40.7 billion at December 31, 2012, primarily reflecting growth in the C&I and automobile portfolios, partially offset by a decline in the CRE portfolio. The C&I portfolio increase was spread across several segments and represented a continuation of the growth in high quality loans originated over recent quarters. The automobile portfolio increase primarily reflected a continued strong level of high quality originations.

At March 31, 2013, commercial loans and leases totaled $22.3 billion and represented 54% of our total credit exposure. Our commercial portfolio is diversified along product type, customer size, and geography, and is comprised of the following ( see Commercial Credit discussion) :

C&I – C&I loans and leases are made to commercial customers for use in normal business operations to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases, or other projects. The majority of these borrowers are customers doing business within our geographic regions. C&I loans and leases are generally underwritten individually and secured with the assets of the company and/or the personal guarantee of the business owners. The financing of owner occupied facilities is considered a C&I loan even though there is improved real estate as collateral. This treatment is a result of the credit decision process, which focuses on cash flow from operations of the business to repay the debt. The operation, sale, rental, or refinancing of the real estate is not considered the primary repayment source for these types of loans. As we expand our C&I portfolio, we have developed a “vertical” strategy to ensure that new products or lending types are embedded within the structured, centralized Commercial Lending area with designated experienced credit officers.

20


Table of Contents

CRE – CRE loans consist of loans for income-producing real estate properties, real estate investment trusts, and real estate developers. We mitigate our risk on these loans by requiring collateral values that exceed the loan amount and underwriting the loan with projected cash flow in excess of the debt service requirement. These loans are made to finance properties such as apartment buildings, office and industrial buildings, and retail shopping centers, and are repaid through cash flows related to the operation, sale, or refinance of the property.

Construction CRE – Construction CRE loans are loans to developers, companies, or individuals used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property. Our construction CRE portfolio primarily consists of retail, multi family, office, and warehouse project types. Generally, these loans are for construction projects that have been presold or preleased, or have secured permanent financing, as well as loans to real estate companies with significant equity invested in each project. These loans are underwritten and managed by a specialized real estate lending group that actively monitors the construction phase and manages the loan disbursements according to the predetermined construction schedule.

Total consumer loans and leases were $19.0 billion at March 31, 2013 and represented 46% of our total loan and lease credit exposure. The consumer portfolio is primarily comprised of automobile, home equity loans and lines-of-credit, and residential mortgages (see Consumer Credit discussion) .

Automobile – Automobile loans are primarily comprised of loans made through automotive dealerships and include exposure in selected states outside of our primary banking markets. No state outside of our primary banking markets represented more than 5% of our total automobile portfolio at March 31, 2013.

Home equity – Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines-of-credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first-lien or junior-lien on the borrower’s residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home or refinance existing mortgage debt. Products include closed-end loans which are generally fixed-rate with principal and interest payments, and variable-rate, interest-only lines-of-credit which do not require payment of principal during the 10-year revolving period of the line-of-credit. Applications are underwritten centrally in conjunction with an automated underwriting system. The home equity underwriting criteria is based on minimum credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, and LTV ratios, with current collateral valuations.

Residential mortgage – Residential mortgage loans represent loans to consumers for the purchase or refinance of a residence. These loans are generally financed over a 15-year to 30-year term, and in most cases, are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence. Applications are underwritten centrally and we do not originate residential mortgages that allow negative amortization or allow the borrower multiple payment options. Residential mortgage loans include a complete full appraisal for collateral valuation.

Other consumer – Primarily consists of consumer loans not secured by real estate, including personal unsecured loans.

The table below provides the composition of our total loan and lease portfolio:

Table 8 - Loan and Lease Portfolio Composition

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,

Commercial: (1)

Commercial and industrial

$ 17,267 42 % $ 16,971 42 % $ 16,478 41 % $ 16,322 41 % $ 15,838 39 %

Commercial real estate:

Construction

574 1 648 2 541 1 591 1 597 1

Commercial

4,485 11 4,751 12 4,956 12 5,317 13 5,443 13

Total commercial real estate

5,059 12 5,399 14 5,497 13 5,908 14 6,040 14

Total commercial

22,326 54 22,370 56 21,975 54 22,230 55 21,878 53

Consumer:

Automobile

5,036 12 4,634 11 4,276 11 3,808 10 4,787 12

Home equity

8,474 21 8,335 20 8,381 21 8,344 21 8,261 20

Residential mortgage

5,051 12 4,970 12 5,192 13 5,123 13 5,284 13

Other consumer

397 1 419 1 436 1 454 1 469 2

Total consumer

18,958 46 18,358 44 18,285 46 17,729 45 18,801 47

Total loans and leases

$ 41,284 100 % $ 40,728 100 % $ 40,260 100 % $ 39,959 100 % $ 40,679 100 %

(1) As defined by regulatory guidance, there were no commercial loans outstanding that would be considered a concentration of lending to a particular industry or group of industries.

21


Table of Contents

As shown in the table above, our loan portfolio is diversified by consumer and commercial credit. We designate specific loan types, collateral types, and loan structures as part of our credit concentration policy. C&I lending by segment, specific limits for CRE primary project types, loans secured by residential real estate, shared national credit exposure, and unsecured lending represent examples of specifically tracked components of our concentration management process. Our concentration management process is approved by our board of directors and is one of the strategies utilized to ensure a high quality, well diversified portfolio that is consistent with our overall objective of maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile.

The table below provides our total loan and lease portfolio segregated by the type of collateral securing the loan or lease:

Table 9 - Loan and Lease Portfolio by Collateral Type (1)

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,

Secured loans:

Real estate—commercial

$ 9,041 22 % $ 9,128 22 % $ 9,278 23 % $ 9,398 23 % $ 9,326 24 %

Real estate—consumer

13,525 33 13,305 33 13,573 33 13,467 33 13,470 34

Vehicles

6,928 17 6,659 16 6,096 15 5,650 14 6,623 16

Receivables/Inventory

5,383 13 5,178 13 5,046 13 5,026 13 4,749 12

Machinery/Equipment

2,815 7 2,749 7 2,639 7 2,759 7 2,536 6

Securities/Deposits

840 2 826 2 717 2 789 2 733 2

Other

1,015 2 1,090 3 1,110 3 1,043 3 983 2

Total secured loans and leases

39,547 96 38,935 96 38,459 96 38,132 95 38,420 96

Unsecured loans and leases

1,737 4 1,793 4 1,801 4 1,827 5 1,738 4

Total loans and leases

$ 41,284 100 % $ 40,728 100 % $ 40,260 100 % $ 39,959 100 % $ 40,158 100 %

(1) Loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition of Fidelity Bank are reflected in the above table effective June 30, 2012.

Commercial Credit

Refer to the “Commercial Credit” section of our 2012 Form 10-K for our commercial credit underwriting and on-going credit management processes.

C&I PORTFOLIO

While some C&I borrowers have been challenged by the continued weakness in the economy, problem loans have trended downward, reflecting a combination of proactive risk identification and effective workout strategies implemented by the SAD. Nevertheless, we continue to proactively identify borrowers that may be facing financial difficulty to assess all potential solutions.

CRE PORTFOLIO

We manage the risks inherent in this portfolio specific to CRE lending, focusing on the quality of the developer, and the specifics associated with each project. Generally, we: (1) limit our loans to 80% of the appraised value of the commercial real estate at origination, (2) require net operating cash flows to be 125% of required interest and principal payments, and (3) if the commercial real estate is nonowner occupied, require that at least 50% of the space of the project be preleased. We actively monitor both geographic and project-type concentrations and performance metrics of all CRE loan types, with a focus on loans identified as higher risk based on the risk rating methodology. Both macro-level and loan-level stress-test scenarios based on existing and forecast market conditions are part of the on-going portfolio management process for the CRE portfolio.

In 2010, we segregated our CRE portfolio into core and noncore segments. We believe segregating noncore CRE from core CRE improved our ability to understand the nature, performance prospects, and problem resolution opportunities of these segments, thus allowing us to continue to deal proactively with any emerging credit issues. We have not subsequently originated any noncore CRE loans.

A CRE loan is generally considered core when the borrower is an experienced, well-capitalized developer in our Midwest footprint, and has either an established meaningful relationship with us that generated an acceptable return on capital or demonstrates the prospect of becoming one. The core CRE portfolio was $3.7 billion at March 31, 2013, representing 74% of total CRE loans. The performance of the core portfolio has met our expectations based on the consistency of the asset quality metrics within the portfolio. Based on our extensive project level assessment process, including forward-looking collateral valuations, we continue to believe the credit quality of the core portfolio is stable. Loans are not reclassified between the core and noncore segments based on performance.

22


Table of Contents

Credit quality data regarding the ACL and NALs, segregated by core CRE loans and noncore CRE loans, is presented in the following table:

Table 10 - Commercial Real Estate - Core vs. Noncore Portfolios

March 31, 2013
Ending Nonaccrual

(dollar amounts in millions)

Balance Prior NCOs ACL $ ACL% Credit Mark (1) Loans

Total core

$ 3,744 $ 30 $ 87 2.32 % 3.10 % $ 48

Noncore—SAD (2)

567 125 127 22.40 36.42 61

Noncore—Other

748 17 58 7.75 9.80 2

Total noncore

1,315 142 185 14.07 22.44 63

Total commercial real estate

$ 5,059 $ 172 $ 272 5.38 % 8.49 % $ 111

December 31, 2012
Ending Nonaccrual

(dollar amounts in millions)

Balance Prior NCOs ACL $ ACL% Credit Mark (1) Loans

Total core

$ 3,937 $ 21 $ 100 2.54 % 3.06 % $ 41

Noncore—SAD (2)

597 145 129 21.61 36.93 82

Noncore—Other

865 18 61 7.05 8.95 4

Total noncore

1,462 163 190 13.00 21.72 86

Total commercial real estate

$ 5,399 $ 184 $ 290 5.37 % 8.49 % $ 127

(1)

Calculated as (Prior NCOs + ACL $) / (Ending Balance + Prior NCOs).

(2)

Noncore loans managed by SAD, the area responsible for managing loans and relationships designated as Classified Loans.

As shown in the above table, the ending balance of the CRE portfolio at March 31, 2013, declined $0.3 billion, or 6%, compared with December 31, 2012. The decline in the noncore segment primarily reflected amortization and payoffs as we actively focus on the noncore portfolio to reduce our overall CRE exposure. This reduction demonstrates our continued commitment to achieving a materially lower risk profile in the CRE portfolio, consistent with our overall objective of maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile. The decline in the core segment primarily reflected continued payoffs, partially offset by originations. We continue to support our core developer customers as appropriate, however, new core originations are balanced against internal concentration limits and increased competition, particularly pricing, for high quality developers and projects.

Also, as shown above, substantial reserves for the noncore portfolio have been established. At March 31, 2013, the ACL related to the noncore portfolio was 14.07%. The combination of the existing ACL and prior NCOs represents the total credit actions taken on each segment of the portfolio. From this data, we calculate a credit mark that provides a consistent measurement of the cumulative credit actions taken against a specific portfolio segment. The 36.42% credit mark associated with the SAD-managed noncore portfolio is an indicator of the proactive portfolio management strategy employed for this portfolio.

Consumer Credit

Refer to the “Consumer Credit” section of our 2012 Form 10-K for our consumer credit underwriting and on-going credit management processes.

AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO

Our strategy in the automobile portfolio continued to focus on high quality borrowers as measured by both FICO and internal custom scores, combined with appropriate LTVs, terms, and profitability. Our strategy and operational capabilities allow us to appropriately manage the origination quality across the entire portfolio, including our newer markets. Although increased origination volume and entering new markets can be associated with increased risk levels, we believe our strategy and operational capabilities significantly mitigate these risks.

23


Table of Contents

We have continued to consistently execute our value proposition and take advantage of available market opportunities. Importantly, we have maintained our high credit quality standard while expanding the portfolio. We have developed and implemented a loan securitization strategy to ensure we remain within our established portfolio concentration limits.

RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE SECURED PORTFOLIOS

The properties securing our residential mortgage and home equity portfolios are primarily located within our geographic footprint. The continued stress on home prices has caused the performance in these portfolios to remain weaker than historical levels. The residential-secured portfolio originations continue to be of high quality, with the majority of the negative credit impact coming from loans originated in 2006 and earlier. We continue to evaluate all of our policies and processes associated with managing these portfolios. Our loss mitigation and foreclosure activities are consolidated in one location under common management. This structure allows us to focus on effectively helping our customers with appropriate solutions for their specific circumstances.

Table 11 - Selected Home Equity and Residential Mortgage Portfolio Data

(dollar amounts in millions)

Home Equity Residential Mortgage
Secured by first-lien Secured by junior-lien
03/31/13 12/31/12 03/31/13 12/31/12 03/31/13 12/31/12

Ending balance

$ 4,645 $ 4,380 $ 3,829 $ 3,955 $ 5,051 $ 4,970

Portfolio weighted average LTV ratio (1)

71 % 71 % 81 % 81 % 76 % 76 %

Portfolio weighted average FICO score (2)

754 755 738 741 736 738
Home Equity Residential Mortgage (3)
Secured by first-lien Secured by junior-lien
Three Months Ended March 31,
2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012

Originations

$ 548 $ 427 $ 106 $ 147 $ 319 $ 202

Origination weighted average LTV ratio (1)

66 % 71 % 81 % 81 % 75 % 78 %

Origination weighted average FICO score (2)

778 772 751 757 759 755

(1) The LTV ratios for home equity loans and home equity lines-of-credit are cumulative and reflect the balance of any senior loans. LTV ratios reflect collateral values at the time of loan origination.
(2) Portfolio weighted average FICO scores reflect currently updated customer credit scores whereas origination weighted average FICO scores reflect the customer credit scores at the time of loan origination.
(3) Represents only owned-portfolio originations.

Home Equity Portfolio

Our home equity portfolio (loans and lines-of-credit) consists of both first-lien and junior-lien mortgage loans with underwriting criteria based on minimum credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, and LTV ratios. We offer closed-end home equity loans which are generally fixed-rate with principal and interest payments, and variable-rate interest-only home equity lines-of-credit which do not require payment of principal during the 10-year revolving period of the line-of-credit. Applications are underwritten centrally in conjunction with an automated underwriting system.

Given the low interest rate environment over the past several years, many borrowers have utilized the line-of-credit home equity product as the primary source of financing their home versus residential mortgages. The proportion of the home equity portfolio secured by a first-lien has increased significantly over the past three years, positively impacting the portfolio’s risk profile. At March 31, 2013, 55% of our total home equity portfolio was secured by first-lien mortgages. The first-lien position, combined with continued high average FICO scores, significantly reduces the PD associated with these loans.

Within the home equity line-of-credit portfolio, the standard product is a 10-year interest-only draw period with a 20-year fully amortizing term at the end of the draw period. Prior to 2007, the standard product was a 10-year draw period with a balloon payment, while subsequent originations convert to a 20-year amortizing loan structure. After the 10-year draw period, the borrower must reapply to extend the existing structure or begin repaying the debt in a traditional term structure.

24


Table of Contents

The principal and interest payment associated with the term structure will be higher than the interest-only payment, resulting in “maturity” risk. Our maturity risk can be segregated into two distinct segments: (1) home equity lines-of-credit underwritten with a balloon payment at maturity and (2) home equity lines-of-credit with an automatic conversion to a 20-year amortizing loan. We manage this risk based on both the actual maturity date of the line-of-credit structure and at the end of the 10-year draw period. This maturity risk is embedded in the portfolio which we address with proactive contact strategies beginning one year prior to maturity. In certain circumstances, our Home Saver group is able to provide payment and structure relief to borrowers experiencing significant financial hardship associated with the payment adjustment.

The table below summarizes our home equity line-of-credit portfolio by maturity date:

Table 12 - Maturity Schedule of Home Equity Line-of-Credit Portfolio

March 31, 2013

(dollar amounts in millions)

1 year or less 1 to 2 years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years More than
4 years
Total

Secured by first-lien

$ 46 $ 63 $ 19 $ $ 2,204 $ 2,332

Secured by junior-lien

236 259 196 143 2,377 3,211

Total home equity line-of-credit

$ 282 $ 322 $ 215 $ 143 $ 4,581 $ 5,543

The amounts in the above table maturing in four years or less primarily consist of balloon payment structures and represent the most significant maturity risk. The amounts maturing in more than four years primarily consist of home equity lines-of-credit with a 20-year amortization period after the 10-year draw period.

Historically, less than 30% of our home equity lines-of-credit that are one year or less from maturity actually reach the maturity date as borrowers apply to re-establish the revolving period under current underwriting standards. We anticipate this percentage will decline in future periods as our proactive approach to managing maturity risk continues to evolve.

Residential Mortgages Portfolio

At March 31, 2013, 50% of our total residential mortgage portfolio were ARMs. These ARMs primarily consist of a fixed-rate of interest for the first 3 to 5 years, and then adjust annually. At March 31, 2013, ARM loans that were expected to have rates reset through 2015 totaled $1.4 billion. These loans scheduled to reset are primarily associated with loans originated subsequent to 2007, and as such, are not subject to the most significant declines in underlying property value . Given the quality of our borrowers, the relatively low current interest rates, and the results of our continued analysis (including possible impacts of changes in interest rates), we believe that we have a relatively limited exposure to ARM reset risk. Nonetheless, we have taken actions to mitigate our risk exposure. We initiate borrower contact at least six months prior to the interest rate resetting, and have been successful in converting many ARMs to fixed-rate loans through this process. Given the relatively low current interest rates, many fixed-rate products currently offer a better interest rate to our ARM borrowers.

Several government programs continued to impact the residential mortgage portfolio, including various refinance programs such as HAMP and HARP, which positively affected the availability of credit for the industry. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, we closed $211 million in HARP residential mortgages and $1 million in HAMP residential mortgages. The HARP residential mortgage loans are considered current and are either part of our residential mortgage portfolio or serviced for others. The HAMP refinancings are associated with residential mortgages that are serviced for others. We are subject to repurchase risk associated with residential mortgage loans sold in the secondary market. An appropriate level of reserve for representations and warranties related to residential mortgage loans sold has been established to address this repurchase risk inherent in the portfolio (see Operational Risk discussion).

Credit Quality

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

We believe the most meaningful way to assess overall credit quality performance is through an analysis of credit quality performance ratios. This approach forms the basis of most of the discussion in the sections immediately following: NPAs and NALs, TDRs, ACL, and NCOs. In addition, we utilize delinquency rates, risk distribution and migration patterns, and product segmentation in the analysis of our credit quality performance.

Credit quality performance in the 2013 first quarter, reflected overall continued improvement. NALs and NCOs declined 7% and 26%, respectively, compared to the prior quarter. Commercial criticized and commercial classified loans also declined reflecting the continued improvement in the commercial portfolio. The ACL to total loans ratio declined to 1.91% and our ACL coverage ratios remained at appropriate levels. Our ACL as a percentage of NALs remained strong at 207%.

25


Table of Contents

NPAs, NALs, AND TDRs

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

NPAs and NALs

NPAs consist of (1) NALs, which represent loans and leases no longer accruing interest, (2) impaired loans held for sale, (3) OREO properties, and (4) other NPAs. Any loan in our portfolio may be placed on nonaccrual status prior to the policies described below when collection of principal or interest is in doubt. Also, when a borrower with discharged non-reaffirmed debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is identified and the loan is determined to be collateral dependent, the consumer loan is placed on nonaccrual status.

C&I and CRE loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 90-days past due. With the exception of residential mortgage loans guaranteed by government organizations which continue to accrue interest, residential mortgage loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 150-days past due. First-lien home equity loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 150-days past due. Junior-lien home equity loans are placed on nonaccrual status at the earlier of 120-days past due or when the related first-lien loan has been identified as nonaccrual. Automobile and other consumer loans are generally charged-off when the loan is 120-days past due.

When interest accruals are suspended, accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals charged to earnings and prior year amounts generally charged-off as a credit loss. When, in our judgment, the borrower’s ability to make required interest and principal payments has resumed and collectability is no longer in doubt, the loan or lease is returned to accrual status.

26


Table of Contents

The following table reflects period-end NALs and NPAs detail for each of the last five quarters:

Table 13 - Nonaccrual Loans and Leases and Nonperforming Assets

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,

Nonaccrual loans and leases:

Commercial and industrial

$ 80,928 $ 90,705 $ 109,452 $ 133,678 $ 142,492

Commercial real estate

110,803 127,128 148,986 219,417 205,105

Automobile

6,770 7,823 11,814

Residential mortgage

118,405 122,452 123,140 75,048 74,114

Home equity

63,405 59,525 51,654 46,023 45,847

Total nonaccrual loans and leases (1)

380,311 407,633 445,046 474,166 467,558

Other real estate owned, net

Residential

19,538 21,378 23,640 21,499 31,850

Commercial

5,601 6,719 30,566 17,109 16,897

Total other real estate owned, net

25,139 28,097 54,206 38,608 48,747

Other nonperforming assets (2)

10,045 10,045 10,476 10,476 10,772

Total nonperforming assets

$ 415,495 $ 445,775 $ 509,728 $ 523,250 $ 527,077

Nonaccrual loans as a % of total loans and leases

0.92 % 1.00 % 1.11 % 1.19 % 1.15 %

Nonperforming assets ratio (3)

1.01 1.09 1.26 1.31 1.29

(NPA+90days)/(Loan+OREO) (4)

1.48 1.59 1.75 1.76 1.68

(1) Nonaccrual loans and leases related to Chapter 7 bankruptcy loans were $59.9 million, $60.1 million, and $63.0 million at March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and September 30, 2012, respectively.
(2) Other nonperforming assets represent an investment security backed by a municipal bond.
(3) This ratio is calculated as nonperforming assets divided by the sum of loans and leases, other nonperforming assets, and net other real estate.
(4) This ratio is calculated as the sum of nonperforming assets and total accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more divided by the sum of loans and leases and net other real estate.

The $30.3 million, or 7%, decline in NPAs compared with December 31, 2012, primarily reflected:

$16.3 million, or 13%, decline in CRE NALs, reflecting both NCO activity and problem credit resolutions, including borrower payments and payoffs partially resulting from successful workout strategies implemented by our SAD. Although we anticipate some degree of quarter-to-quarter volatility in our NAL levels, we expect that the overall trend will continue to be lower.

$9.8 million, or 11%, decline in C&I NALs, reflecting problem credit resolutions, including payoffs partially resulting from successful workout strategies implemented by our SAD. The decline was associated with loans throughout our footprint, with no specific industry concentration.

$4.0 million, or 3%, decrease in residential mortgage NALs, primarily due to successful workouts of several larger problem loans as well as a lower level of inflows compared to prior quarters. The NAL balances have been written down to collateral value, less anticipated selling costs which substantially limits any significant future risk of additional loss on these loans.

Partially offset by:

$3.9 million, or 7%, increase in home equity NALs, primarily reflecting lower NCOs as we continue to work with troubled borrowers to take advantage of the current low interest-rate environment and the recent stabilization of home prices. The NAL balances have been written down to collateral value, less anticipated selling costs which substantially limits any significant future risk of additional loss on these loans, and make a modification more likely for borrowers with consistent cash flow.

27


Table of Contents

TDR Loans

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

TDRs are modified loans in which a concession is provided to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. TDRs can be classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loans. Nonaccrual TDRs are included in NALs whereas accruing TDRs are excluded from NALs, as it is probable that all contractual principal and interest due under the restructured terms will be collected. TDRs primarily reflect our loss mitigation efforts to proactively work with borrowers having difficulty making their payments.

The table below presents our accruing and nonaccruing TDRs at period-end for each of the past five quarters:

Table 14 - Accruing and Nonaccruing Troubled Debt Restructured Loans

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,

Troubled debt restructured loans—accruing:

Commercial and industrial

$ 90,642 $ 76,586 $ 55,809 $ 57,008 $ 53,795

Commercial real estate

192,167 208,901 222,155 202,190 231,923

Automobile

34,379 35,784 33,719 34,460 35,521

Home equity

162,087 110,581 92,763 66,997 59,270

Residential mortgage

288,041 290,011 280,890 298,967 294,836

Other consumer

2,514 2,544 2,644 3,038 4,233

Total troubled debt restructured loans—accruing

769,830 724,407 687,980 662,660 679,578

Troubled debt restructured loans—nonaccruing:

Commercial and industrial

14,970 19,268 28,859 35,535 26,886

Commercial real estate

26,588 32,548 20,284 55,022 39,606

Automobile

6,770 7,823 11,814

Home equity

11,235 6,951 7,756 374 334

Residential mortgage

84,317 84,515 83,163 28,332 29,549

Other consumer

113 113 113 113

Total troubled debt restructured loans—nonaccruing

143,880 151,218 151,989 119,376 96,488

Total troubled debt restructured loans

$ 913,710 $ 875,625 $ 839,969 $ 782,036 $ 776,066

The increase in the accruing TDR home equity portfolio is primarily related to the refinancing of certain maturing lines-of-credit structured as a 10-year draw period with a balloon payment to a new loan with a 20-year amortization period. Based on the borrower’s financial condition, we believe the new 20-year amortizing loan would not have been available to the borrower through normal channels or other sources. As such, we view this as a concession and have designated the new loan as a TDR.

Our strategy is to structure commercial TDRs in a manner that avoids new concessions subsequent to the initial TDR terms. However, there are times when subsequent modifications are required, such as when the modified loan matures. Often the loans are performing in accordance with the TDR terms, and a new note is originated with similar modified terms. These loans are subjected to the normal underwriting standards and processes for other similar credit extensions, both new and existing. If the loan is not performing in accordance with the existing TDR terms, typically a more aggressive strategy is put in place. In accordance with ASC 310-20-35, the refinanced note is evaluated to determine if it is considered a new loan or a continuation of the prior loan. A new loan is considered for removal of the TDR designation. A continuation of the prior note requires the continuation of the TDR designation, and because the refinanced note constitutes a new legal agreement, they are included in our TDR activity table (below) as a new TDR and a restructured TDR removal during the period.

The types of concessions granted are consistent with those granted on new TDRs and include interest rate reductions, amortization or maturity date changes beyond what the collateral supports, and principal forgiveness based on the borrower’s specific needs at a point in time. Our policy does not limit the number of times a loan may be modified. A loan may be modified multiple times if it is considered to be in the best interest of both the borrower and us.

Loans are not automatically considered to be accruing TDRs upon the granting of a new concession. Accrual status is determined based on delinquency status and whether collection of principal and interest is in doubt. If the loan is not 90-days past due and no loss is expected based on the modified terms, the modified TDR remains in accruing status. For loans that are on nonaccrual status before the modification, collection of both principal and interest must not be in doubt, and the borrower must be able to exhibit sufficient cash flows for a six-month period of time to service the debt in order to return to accruing status. This six-month period could extend before or after the restructure date.

28


Table of Contents

The following table reflects TDR activity for each of the past five quarters:

Table 15 - Troubled Debt Restructured Loan Activity

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

First Fourth Third Second First

TDRs, beginning of period

$ 875,625 $ 839,968 $ 782,035 $ 776,065 $ 805,650

New TDRs

164,407 169,850 196,707 94,631 136,237

Payments

(44,183 ) (61,491 ) (51,125 ) (38,299 ) (40,120 )

Charge-offs

(5,395 ) (16,985 ) (22,537 ) (16,551 ) (25,042 )

Sales

(4,814 ) (2,933 ) (3,978 ) (1,840 ) (5,036 )

Transfer to OREO

(1,124 ) (3,403 ) (15,974 ) (860 ) (1,472 )

Restructured TDRs—accruing (1)

(53,936 ) (40,682 ) (30,439 ) (20,135 ) (62,327 )

Restructured TDRs—nonaccruing (1)

(10,674 ) (7,138 ) (14,721 ) (10,833 ) (30,388 )

Other

(6,196 ) (1,561 ) (143 ) (1,437 )

TDRs, end of period

$ 913,710 $ 875,625 $ 839,968 $ 782,035 $ 776,065

(1) Represents existing commercial TDRs that were re-underwritten with new terms providing a concession. A corresponding amount is included in the New TDRs amount above.

ACL

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

We maintain two reserves, both of which in our judgment are appropriate to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio: the ALLL and the AULC. Combined, these reserves comprise the total ACL. Our Credit Administration group is responsible for developing the methodology assumptions and estimates used in the calculation, as well as determining the appropriateness of the ACL. The ALLL represents the estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the reported date. Additions to the ALLL result from recording provision expense for loan losses or increased risk levels resulting from loan risk-rating downgrades, while reductions reflect charge-offs (net of recoveries), decreased risk levels resulting from loan risk-rating upgrades, or the sale of loans. The AULC is determined by applying the transaction reserve process to the unfunded portion of the loan exposures adjusted by an applicable funding expectation.

A provision for credit losses is recorded to adjust the ACL to the level we have determined to be appropriate to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio. The provision for credit losses in the 2013 first quarter was $29.6 million, compared with $39.5 million in the prior quarter and $34.4 million in the year-ago quarter. (See Provision for Credit Losses discussion).

We regularly evaluate the appropriateness of the ACL by performing on-going evaluations of the loan and lease portfolio, including such factors as the differing economic risks associated with each loan category, the financial condition of specific borrowers, the level of delinquent loans, the value of any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or other documented support. We evaluate the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on the ability of borrowers to meet their financial obligations when quantifying our exposure to credit losses and assessing the appropriateness of our ACL at each reporting date. In addition to general economic conditions and the other factors described above, we also consider the impact of collateral value trends and portfolio diversification.

Our ACL evaluation process includes the on-going assessment of credit quality metrics, and a comparison of certain ACL benchmarks to current performance. While the total ACL balance has declined in recent quarters, all of the relevant benchmarks remain strong.

29


Table of Contents

The table below reflects the allocation of our ACL among our various loan categories during each of the past five quarters:

Table 16 - Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses (1)

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,

Commercial

Commercial and industrial

$ 238,098 42 % $ 241,051 42 % $ 257,081 41 % $ 280,548 41 % $ 246,026 39 %

Commercial real estate

267,436 12 285,369 14 280,376 13 305,391 14 339,494 14

Total commercial

505,534 54 526,420 56 537,457 54 585,939 55 585,520 53

Consumer

Automobile

35,973 12 34,979 11 33,281 11 30,217 10 36,552 12

Home equity

115,858 21 118,764 20 122,605 21 135,562 21 168,898 20

Residential mortgage

63,062 12 61,658 12 67,220 13 78,015 13 89,129 13

Other consumer

26,342 1 27,254 1 28,579 1 29,913 1 32,970 2

Total consumer

241,235 46 242,655 44 251,685 46 273,707 45 327,549 47

Total allowance for loan and lease losses

746,769 100 % 769,075 100 % 789,142 100 % 859,646 100 % 913,069 100 %

Allowance for unfunded loan commitments

40,855 40,651 53,563 50,978 50,934

Total allowance for credit losses

$ 787,624 $ 809,726 $ 842,705 $ 910,624 $ 964,003

Total allowance for loan and leases losses as % of:

Total loans and leases

1.81 % 1.89 % 1.96 % 2.15 % 2.24 %

Nonaccrual loans and leases

196 189 177 181 195

Nonperforming assets

180 173 155 164 173

Total allowance for credit losses as % of:

Total loans and leases

1.91 % 1.99 % 2.09 % 2.28 % 2.37 %

Nonaccrual loans and leases

207 199 189 192 206

Nonperforming assets

190 182 165 174 183

(1) Percentages represent the percentage of each loan and lease category to total loans and leases.

The reduction in the ALLL compared with December 31, 2012 primarily reflected a decline in the CRE portfolio. This decline reflected significant improvements in the level of Criticized and Classified loans combined with lower CRE loan balances.

The ACL to total loans declined to 1.91% at March 31, 2013, compared to 1.99% at December 31, 2012. We believe the decline in the ratio is appropriate given the continued improvement in the risk profile of our loan portfolio. Further, we believe that early identification of loans with changes in credit metrics and aggressive action plans for these loans, combined with originating high quality new loans will contribute to continued improvement in our key credit quality metrics. The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Coincident Economic Activity Index, a proxy for overall economic growth, indicates the recoveries in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana have been stronger than in the overall United States since the recession ended in June 2009. The firming of natural gas prices and a gradual improvement in the global economy should also provide some additional support to economic growth as the year progresses.

We have significant exposure to loans secured by residential real estate and continue to be an active lender in our communities. Recently, real estate values have begun to slowly rise from their 2011 levels. Industry indices, as well as our own view of our primary markets, indicate home prices continued to slowly increase across our primary markets. In aggregate, the housing markets in our footprint states have mirrored the national recovery trend.

Given the combination of these noted positive and negative factors, we believe that our ACL is appropriate and its coverage level is reflective of the quality of our portfolio and the current operating environment.

NCOs

Any loan in any portfolio may be charged-off prior to the policies described below if a loss confirming event has occurred. Loss confirming events include, but are not limited to, bankruptcy (unsecured), continued delinquency, foreclosure, or receipt of an asset valuation indicating a collateral deficiency and that asset is the sole source of repayment. Additionally, discharged, collateral dependent non-reaffirmed debt in Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings will result in a charge-off to estimated collateral value, less anticipated selling costs at the time of the modification.

30


Table of Contents

C&I and CRE loans are either charged-off or written down to net realizable value at 90-days past due. Automobile loans and other consumer loans are charged-off at 120-days past due. First-lien and junior-lien home equity loans are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, at 150-days past due and 120-days past due, respectively. Residential mortgages are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, at 150-days past due.

31


Table of Contents

The following table reflects NCO detail for each of the last five quarters:

Table 17 - Quarterly Net Charge-off Analysis

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

First Fourth Third Second First

Net charge-offs by loan and lease type:

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

$ 3,317 $ 7,052 $ 13,023 $ 15,678 $ 28,495

Commercial real estate:

Construction

(798 ) 11,038 (280 ) (1,531 ) (1,186 )

Commercial

13,576 10,333 17,654 30,709 11,692

Commercial real estate

12,778 21,371 17,374 29,178 10,506

Total commercial

16,095 28,423 30,397 44,856 39,001

Consumer:

Automobile

2,594 1,896 4,019 449 3,078

Home equity

19,982 25,013 46,592 21,045 23,729

Residential mortgage

6,148 9,687 16,880 10,786 10,570

Other consumer

6,868 5,111 7,207 7,109 6,614

Total consumer

35,592 41,707 74,698 39,389 43,991

Total net charge-offs

$ 51,687 $ 70,130 $ 105,095 $ 84,245 $ 82,992

Net charge-offs—annualized percentages:

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

0.08 % 0.17 % 0.32 % 0.39 % 0.77 %

Commercial real estate:

Construction

(0.53 ) 7.67 (0.20 ) (1.05 ) (0.79 )

Commercial

1.16 0.84 1.37 2.24 0.89

Commercial real estate

0.97 1.56 1.21 1.92 0.72

Total commercial

0.29 0.52 0.55 0.81 0.75

Consumer:

Automobile

0.21 0.17 0.40 0.04 0.27

Home equity

0.95 1.20 2.23 1.01 1.15

Residential mortgage

0.49 0.75 1.30 0.82 0.82

Other consumer

6.67 4.74 6.49 6.15 5.45

Total consumer

0.76 0.91 1.65 0.83 0.95

Net charge-offs as a % of average loans

0.51 % 0.69 % 1.05 % 0.82 % 0.85 %

In assessing NCO trends, it is helpful to understand the process of how commercial loans are treated as they deteriorate over time. The ALLL established is consistent with the level of risk associated with the original underwriting. As a part of our normal portfolio management process for commercial loans, the loan is periodically reviewed and the ALLL is increased or decreased based on the revised risk rating. In certain cases, the standard ALLL is determined to not be appropriate, and a specific reserve is established based on the projected cash flow or collateral value of the specific loan. Charge-offs, if necessary, are generally recognized in a period after the specific ALLL was established. If the previously established ALLL exceeds that necessary to satisfactorily resolve the problem loan, a reduction in the overall level of the ALLL could be recognized. Consumer loans are treated in much the same manner as commercial loans, with increasing reserve factors applied based on the risk characteristics of the loan, although specific reserves are not identified for consumer loans. In summary, if loan quality deteriorates, the typical credit sequence would be periods of reserve building, followed by periods of higher NCOs as the previously established ALLL is utilized. Additionally, an increase in the ALLL either precedes or is in conjunction with increases in NALs. When a loan is classified as NAL, it is evaluated for specific ALLL or charge-off. As a result, an increase in NALs does not necessarily result in an increase in the ALLL or an expectation of higher future NCOs.

We anticipate a continuation of the pattern established over the last year of residential mortgage portfolio NCO annualized percentages being lower than the home equity portfolio NCO annualized percentages. As we have focused on originating high-quality home equity loans, we believe the PD risk is lower in the home equity portfolio. However, the LGD component is significantly higher than the residential mortgage portfolio, which results in our projection for lower NCOs in the residential mortgage portfolio relative to the home equity portfolio in the future. Therefore, we believe the residential mortgage NCO annualized percentage will remain lower compared to the home equity portfolio as a result of the entire first-lien composition of the residential mortgage portfolio, as well as the result of previous credit actions improving the underlying quality of these portfolios.

Both the home equity and residential mortgage portfolio NCO levels are anticipated to remain at elevated levels in the near future. The home equity portfolio will continue to be impacted by borrowers that are seeking to refinance, but are in a negative equity position because of the junior-lien loan. Right-sizing and debt forgiveness associated with these situations are becoming more frequent as borrowers realize the impact to their credit is minor, and that a default on a junior-lien loan is not likely to cause borrowers to lose their home.

32


Table of Contents

All residential mortgage loans greater than 150-days past due are charged-down to the estimated value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs. The remaining balance is in delinquent status until a modification can be completed, or the loan goes through the foreclosure process. For the home equity portfolio, virtually all of the defaults represent full charge-offs as there is no remaining equity, creating a lower delinquency rate but a higher NCO impact.

2013 First Quarter versus 2012 Fourth Quarter

C&I NCOs decreased $3.7 million, or 53%, primarily reflecting higher recoveries from prior charge-offs. Current quarter NCOs did not represent any specific concentration in either geography or project type. Given the relatively low absolute level of NCOs in this portfolio, some degree of volatility on a quarter to quarter basis is expected.

CRE NCOs decreased $8.6 million, or 40%. As with the C&I portfolio, given the low absolute level of NCOs in the portfolio, some degree of volatility on a quarter to quarter basis is expected.

Automobile NCOs increased $0.7 million, or 37%, consistent with our expectations for the portfolio. The relatively low levels of NCOs reflected the continued high credit quality of originations and a strong resale market for used automobiles. We anticipate continued strength in the used automobile market for the remainder of 2013.

Residential mortgage NCOs decreased $3.5 million, or 37%, primarily reflecting a continuation of the improving trend for this portfolio.

Home equity NCOs decreased $5.0 million, or 20%. The current quarter reflected fewer significant dollar size losses compared to the prior quarter.

Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of loss due to changes in market values of assets and liabilities. We incur market risk in the normal course of business through exposures to market interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, and credit spreads. We have identified two primary sources of market risk: interest rate risk and price risk.

Interest Rate Risk

OVERVIEW

Huntington actively manages interest rate risk, as changes in market interest rates can have a significant impact on reported earnings. The interest rate risk process is designed to compare income simulations in market scenarios designed to alter the direction, magnitude, and speed of interest rate changes, as well as the slope of the yield curve. These scenarios are designed to illustrate the embedded optionality in the balance sheet from, among other things, faster or slower mortgage prepayments and changes in deposit mix.

INCOME SIMULATION AND ECONOMIC VALUE ANALYSIS

Interest rate risk measurement is calculated and reported to the ALCO and ROC monthly. The information reported includes the identification of any policy limits exceeded, along with an assessment that describes the policy limit breach and outlines the action plan and timeline for resolution, mitigation, or assumption of the risk.

Huntington uses two approaches to model interest rate risk: Interest Sensitive Earnings at Risk (ISE analysis) and Economic Value of Equity (EVE analysis). Under ISE analysis, net interest income is modeled utilizing various assumptions for assets, liabilities, and derivative positions under various interest rate scenarios over a one year time horizon. Market implied forward rates and various likely and extreme interest rate scenarios are used for ISE analysis. These likely and extreme scenarios include rapid and gradual interest rate ramps, rate shocks and yield curve twists.

The ISE analysis used in the following table reflects the analysis used monthly by management. It models gradual -25, +100 and +200 basis point parallel shifts in market interest rates over the next one-year period, beyond the interest rate change implied by the forward yield curve. Due to the current low level of interest rates, the analysis reflects a declining interest rate scenario of 25 basis points, the point at which many assets and liabilities reach zero percent.

33


Table of Contents

Huntington is within Board policy limits for the +100 and +200 basis point scenarios. There is no policy limit for the -25 basis point scenario. The table below shows the results of the scenario as of March 31, 2013:

Table 18 - Interest Sensitive Earnings at Risk

Interest Sensitive Earnings at Risk (%)

Basis point change scenario

-25 +100 +200

Board policy limits

-2.0 % -4.0 %

March 31, 2013

-0.6 1.8 3.1

The ISE at risk reported at March 31, 2013, shows that Huntington is asset sensitive, meaning that earnings increase (decrease) when rates rise (fall). The primary reason for these results is that more assets (primarily LIBOR-indexed loans to customers) than liabilities (primarily non-maturity deposits) will reprice over the modeled one-year period.

The following table shows the income sensitivity of selected assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. The table compares the ISE analysis for selected Huntington portfolios to a portfolio that assumes 100% sensitivity to changes in interest rates. We calculate the percent change in interest income/expense as the change in the base Huntington portfolio divided by the change in the 100% sensitive portfolio.

The results for the +100 and +200 basis point ramps also confirm the asset sensitive nature of the portfolio. In both the +100 and +200 basis point ramps, interest income for total loans (37.1% and 38.5%, respectively) increases faster than interest expense for interest bearing deposits (33.5% and 35.5%, respectively). Additionally, total borrowings show changes in interest expense of 62.5% and 66.9% for +100 and +200 basis point scenarios, respectively. While these results are high, since total borrowings represent a small percentage of total interest-sensitive liabilities, the financial impact of their sensitivity to rising rates is minimal. The -25 basis point parallel ramp confirms the asset sensitive position as the interest income for total loans (-9.7%), decreases faster than the interest expense of deposits (-7.4%).

Table 19 - Interest Income/Expense Sensitivity

Percent of Percent Change in Interest Income/Expense
Total Earning For a Given Change in Interest Rates
Assets (1) Over / (Under) Base Case Parallel Ramp

Basis point change scenario

-25 +100 +200

Total loans

81 % -9.7 % 37.1 % 38.5 %

Total investments and other earning assets

19 -5.7 31.5 24.0

Total interest-sensitive income

-8.9 35.3 35.3

Total interest-bearing deposits

67 -7.4 33.5 35.5

Total borrowings

4 -13.5 62.5 66.9

Total interest-sensitive expense

-7.9 35.7 37.9

(1) At March 31, 2013

The EVE analysis measures the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, and the change in this equity value as rates change. Management focuses on the -25, +100, and +200 basis point shock scenarios.

The EVE analysis used in the following table reflects the analysis used monthly by management. It models immediate -25, +100 and +200 basis point parallel shifts in market interest rates. Due to the current low level of interest rates, the analysis reflects a declining interest rate scenario of 25 basis points, the point at which many assets and liabilities reach zero percent.

34


Table of Contents

Huntington is within Board policy limits for the +100 and +200 basis point scenarios. There is no policy limit for the -25 basis point scenario. The table below shows the results of the scenario as of March 31, 2013:

Table 20 - Economic Value of Equity at Risk

Economic Value of Equity at Risk (%)

Basis point change scenario

-25 +100 +200

Board policy limits

-5.0 % -12.0 %

March 31, 2013

0.6 -3.9 -9.2

The EVE at risk reported at March 31, 2013, shows that as interest rates increase (decrease) immediately, the economic value of equity position will decrease (increase), since the amount and duration of the assets are longer than the amount and duration of liabilities. When interest rates rise, fixed rate assets generally lose economic value; the longer the duration, the greater the value lost. The opposite is true when interest rates fall.

The following table details the economic value sensitivity to changes in market interest rates at March 31, 2013 for loans, investments, deposits, and borrowings. The change in economic value for each portfolio is measured as the percent change from the base economic value for that portfolio. The analysis reflects that, in a sharply higher rate scenario, total tangible assets are more sensitive than total tangible liabilities. Investments and other earning assets contribute to this sensitivity, largely due to fixed rate securities investments.

Table 21 - Economic Value Sensitivity

Percent of
Total Net Percent Change in Economic Value
Tangible For a Given Change in Interest Rates
Assets (1) Over / (Under) Base Case Parallel Shocks

Basis point change scenario

-25 +100 +200

Total loans

74 % 0.4 % -1.6 % -3.4 %

Total investments and other earning assets

18 0.7 -3.3 -6.9

Total net tangible assets (2)

0.4 -1.9 -4.0

Total deposits

84 -0.4 1.7 3.2

Total borrowings

4 -0.2 0.5 1.1

Total net tangible liabilities (3)

-0.4 1.6 3.1

(1) At March 31, 2013.
(2) Tangible assets excluding ALLL.
(3) Tangible liabilities excluding AULC.

MSRs

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 6 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

At March 31, 2013, we had a total of $139.9 million of capitalized MSRs representing the right to service $15.4 billion in mortgage loans. Of this $139.9 million, $35.6 million was recorded using the fair value method, and $104.3 million was recorded using the amortization method.

MSR fair values are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans, which can be greatly reduced by prepayments. Prepayments usually increase when mortgage interest rates decline and decrease when mortgage interest rates rise. We have employed strategies to reduce the risk of MSR fair value changes or impairment. In addition, we engage a third party to provide valuation tools and assistance with our strategies with the objective to decrease the volatility from MSR fair value changes. However, volatile changes in interest rates can diminish the effectiveness of these hedges. We typically report MSR fair value adjustments net of hedge-related trading activity in the mortgage banking income category of noninterest income. Changes in fair value between reporting dates are recorded as an increase or a decrease in mortgage banking income.

MSRs recorded using the amortization method generally relate to loans originated with historically low interest rates, resulting in a lower probability of prepayments and, ultimately, impairment. MSR assets are included in accrued income and other assets in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

35


Table of Contents

Price Risk

Price risk represents the risk of loss arising from adverse movements in the prices of financial instruments that are carried at fair value and are subject to fair value accounting. We have price risk from trading securities, securities owned by our broker-dealer subsidiaries, foreign exchange positions, equity investments, investments in securities backed by mortgage loans, and marketable equity securities held by our insurance subsidiaries. We have established loss limits on the trading portfolio, on the amount of foreign exchange exposure that can be maintained, and on the amount of marketable equity securities that can be held by the insurance subsidiaries.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk of loss due to the possibility that funds may not be available to satisfy current or future commitments resulting from external macro market issues, investor and customer perception of financial strength, and events unrelated to us, such as war, terrorism, or financial institution market specific issues. In addition, the mix and maturity structure of Huntington’s balance sheet, amount of on-hand cash and unencumbered securities, and the availability of contingent sources of funding, can have an impact on Huntington’s ability to satisfy current or future funding commitments. We manage liquidity risk at both the Bank and the parent company.

The overall objective of liquidity risk management is to ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations, and can maintain sufficient levels of on-hand liquidity, under both normal business as usual and unanticipated stressed circumstances. The ALCO was appointed by our ROC to oversee liquidity risk management and the establishment of liquidity risk policies and limits. Contingency funding plans are in place, which measure forecasted sources and uses of funds under various scenarios in order to prepare for unexpected liquidity shortages. Liquidity risk is reviewed monthly for the Bank and the parent company, as well as its subsidiaries. In addition, liquidity working groups meet regularly to identify and monitor liquidity positions, provide policy guidance, review funding strategies, and oversee the adherence to, and maintenance of, the contingency funding plans.

Investment securities portfolio

The expected weighted average maturities of our AFS and HTM portfolios are significantly shorter than their contractual maturities as reflected in Note 4 and Note 5 of the Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Particularly regarding MBS and ABS securities, prepayments of principal and interest that historically occur in advance of scheduled maturities will shorten the expected life of these portfolios. The expected weighted average maturities, which take account of the expected prepayments of principal and interest under existing interest rate conditions, are shown in the following table:

Table 22 - Expected life of investment securities

March 31, 2013
Available-for-Sale & Other Held-to-Maturity
Securities Securities
Amortized Fair Amortized Fair

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Cost Value Cost Value

Under 1 year

$ 375,415 $ 379,254 $ $

1 - 5 years

5,189,188 5,322,001 1,001,034 1,021,324

6 - 10 years

1,298,868 1,310,177 682,230 702,318

Over 10 years

256,080 164,489 9,810 9,812

Other securities

328,199 328,718

Total

$ 7,447,750 $ 7,504,639 $ 1,693,074 $ 1,733,454

Bank Liquidity and Sources of Liquidity

Our primary sources of funding for the Bank are retail and commercial core deposits. At March 31, 2013, these core deposits funded 79% of total assets (108% of total loans). At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, total core deposits represented 94% and 95%, respectively, of total deposits.

Core deposits are comprised of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand deposits, money market deposits, savings and other domestic deposits, consumer certificates of deposit both over and under $250,000, and nonconsumer certificates of deposit less than $250,000. Noncore deposits consist of brokered money market deposits and certificates of deposit, foreign time deposits, and other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more comprised primarily of public fund certificates of deposit more than $250,000.

36


Table of Contents

Core deposits may increase our need for liquidity as certificates of deposit mature or are withdrawn before maturity and as nonmaturity deposits, such as checking and savings account balances, are withdrawn. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $0.2 billion from December 31, 2012, but include certain large commercial deposits that may be more short-term in nature.

Demand deposit overdrafts that have been reclassified as loan balances were $12.9 million and $17.2 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more and brokered deposits and negotiable CDs totaled $2.2 billion and $1.9 billion at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The following tables reflect deposit composition and short-term borrowings detail for each of the last five quarters:

Table 23 - Deposit Composition

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,

By Type

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 12,757 27 % $ 12,600 27 % $ 12,680 27 % $ 12,324 27 % $ 11,797 26 %

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

6,135 13 6,218 13 5,909 13 6,060 13 6,126 14

Money market deposits

15,165 32 14,691 32 14,926 32 13,756 30 13,169 29

Savings and other domestic deposits

5,174 11 5,002 11 4,949 11 4,961 11 4,954 11

Core certificates of deposit

5,170 11 5,516 12 5,817 12 6,508 14 6,920 15

Total core deposits

44,401 94 44,027 95 44,281 95 43,609 95 42,966 95

Other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more

355 1 354 1 352 1 260 1 325 1

Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs

1,807 4 1,594 3 1,795 4 1,888 4 1,276 3

Deposits in foreign offices

304 1 278 1 313 319 442 1

Total deposits

$ 46,867 100 % $ 46,253 100 % $ 46,741 100 % $ 46,076 100 % $ 45,009 100 %

Total core deposits:

Commercial

$ 18,502 42 % $ 18,358 42 % $ 19,207 43 % $ 18,324 42 % $ 17,101 40 %

Consumer

25,899 58 25,669 58 25,074 57 25,285 58 25,865 60

Total core deposits

$ 44,401 100 % $ 44,027 100 % $ 44,281 100 % $ 43,609 100 % $ 42,966 100 %

Table 24 - Federal Funds Purchased and Repurchase Agreements

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,

Balance at period-end

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 725 $ 576 $ 1,249 $ 1,191 $ 1,482

Other short-term borrowings

8 14 11 15 22

Weighted average interest rate at period-end

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

0.09 % 0.15 % 0.14 % 0.19 % 0.14 %

Other short-term borrowings

2.50 1.98 1.99 1.57 0.81

Maximum amount outstanding at month-end during the period

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 781 $ 1,166 $ 1,464 $ 1,286 $ 1,590

Other short-term borrowings

9 26 16 26 23

Average amount outstanding during the period

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 752 $ 996 $ 1,315 $ 1,365 $ 1,501

Other short-term borrowings

10 16 15 26 11

Weighted average interest rate during the period

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

0.10 % 0.12 % 0.15 % 0.15 % 0.14 %

Other short-term borrowings

2.13 1.52 1.67 0.92 1.76

37


Table of Contents

To the extent we are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, we may meet our liquidity needs through sources of wholesale funding or asset securitization or sale. Sources of wholesale funding include other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more, brokered deposits and negotiable CDs, deposits in foreign offices, short-term borrowings, FHLB advances, other long-term debt, and subordinated notes. At March 31, 2013, total wholesale funding was $4.7 billion, a decrease from $5.2 billion at December 31, 2012.

The Bank also has access to the Federal Reserve’s discount window. These borrowings are secured by commercial loans and home equity lines-of-credit. The Bank is also a member of the FHLB, and as such, has access to advances from this facility. These advances are generally secured by residential mortgages, other mortgage-related loans, and available-for-sale securities. Information regarding amounts pledged, for the ability to borrow if necessary, and the unused borrowing capacity at both the Federal Reserve Bank and the FHLB, is outlined in the following table:

Table 25 - Federal Reserve and FHLB Borrowing Capacity

March 31, December 31,

(dollar amounts in billions)

2013 2012

Loans and securities pledged:

Federal Reserve Bank

$ 10.9 $ 10.2

FHLB

8.1 8.2

Total loans and securities pledged

$ 19.0 $ 18.4

Total unused borrowing capacity at Federal Reserve Bank and FHLB

$ 11.8 $ 10.3

At March 31, 2013, we believe the Bank had sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations for the foreseeable future.

Parent Company Liquidity

The parent company’s funding requirements consist primarily of dividends to shareholders, debt service, income taxes, operating expenses, funding of nonbank subsidiaries, repurchases of our stock, and acquisitions. The parent company obtains funding to meet obligations from interest received from the Bank, interest and dividends received from direct subsidiaries, net taxes collected from subsidiaries included in the federal consolidated tax return, fees for services provided to subsidiaries, and the issuance of debt securities.

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the parent company had $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents.

On April 17, 2013, we announced that the board of directors had declared a quarterly common stock cash dividend of $0.05 per common share. The dividend is payable on July 1, 2013, to shareholders of record on June 17, 2013. Based on the current quarterly dividend of $0.05 per common share, cash demands required for common stock dividends are estimated to be approximately $41.9 million per quarter. Based on the current dividend, cash demands required for Series A Preferred Stock are estimated to be approximately $7.7 million per quarter. Cash demands required for Series B Preferred Stock are expected to be approximately $0.3 million per quarter.

Based on a regulatory dividend limitation, the Bank could not have declared and paid a dividend to the parent company at March 31, 2013, without regulatory approval due to the deficit position of its undivided profits. We do not anticipate that the Bank will need to pay dividends in the near future as we continue to build Bank regulatory capital above its already well-capitalized level. To help meet any additional liquidity needs, we have an open-ended, automatic shelf registration statement filed and effective with the SEC, which permits us to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity securities.

Other parent company obligations due in the next 12 months include a $50 million subordinated note due in April 2013.

With the exception of the items discussed above, the parent company does not have any significant cash demands. It is our policy to keep operating cash on hand at the parent company to satisfy expected cash demands for the next 18 months.

38


Table of Contents

We sponsor a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees hired or rehired prior to January 1, 2010. The Plan provides benefits based upon length of service and compensation levels. Our policy is to contribute an annual amount that is at least equal to the minimum funding requirements. The Bank and other subsidiaries fund approximately 90% of pension contributions. Although not required, Huntington may choose to make a cash contribution to the Plan up to the maximum deductible limit in the 2013 plan year. Funding requirements are calculated annually as of the end of the year and are heavily dependent on the value of our pension plan assets and the interest rate used to discount plan obligations. To the extent that the low interest rate environment continues, including as a result of the Federal Reserve Maturity Extension Program, or the pension plan does not earn the expected asset return rates, annual pension contribution requirements in future years could increase and such increases could be significant. Any additional pension contributions are not expected to significantly impact liquidity.

Basel III includes short-term liquidity (Liquidity Coverage Ratio) and long-term funding (Net Stable Funding Ratio) standards. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio, or LCR, is designed to ensure that banking organizations maintain an adequate level of cash, or assets that can readily be converted to cash, to meet potential short-term liquidity needs. On January 7, 2013, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued a final standard on the Liquidity Coverage Ratio. The final standard delays full implementation of the LCR. Partial implementation begins on January 1, 2015 with 60% of the high quality liquid assets requirement and increases ratably until full implementation of the LCR effective January 1, 2019. The Net Stable Funding Ratio, which is scheduled to take effect by January 1, 2018, is designed to promote a stable maturity structure of assets and liabilities of banking organizations over a one-year time horizon. These requirements are subject to change by our banking regulators.

Considering the factors discussed above, and other analyses that we have performed, we believe the parent company has sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations for the foreseeable future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of business, we enter into various off-balance sheet arrangements. These arrangements include financial guarantees contained in standby letters-of-credit issued by the Bank and commitments by the Bank to sell mortgage loans.

Standby letters-of-credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. Most of these arrangements mature within two years and are expected to expire without being drawn upon. Standby letters-of-credit are included in the determination of the amount of risk-based capital that the parent company and the Bank are required to hold.

Through our credit process, we monitor the credit risks of outstanding standby letters-of-credit. When it is probable that a standby letter of credit will be drawn and not repaid in full, losses are recognized in the provision for credit losses. At March 31, 2013, we had $478.8 million of standby letters-of-credit outstanding, of which 81% were collateralized. Included in this $478.8 million are letters-of-credit issued by the Bank that support securities that were issued by our customers and remarketed by The Huntington Investment Company, our broker-dealer subsidiary.

We enter into forward contracts relating to the mortgage banking business to hedge the exposures we have from commitments to extend new residential mortgage loans to our customers and from our mortgage loans held for sale. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had commitments to sell residential real estate loans of $737.3 million and $849.8 million, respectively. These contracts mature in less than one year.

We do not believe that off-balance sheet arrangements will have a material impact on our liquidity or capital resources.

Operational Risk

As with all companies, we are subject to operational risk. Operational risk is the risk of loss due to human error; inadequate or failed internal systems and controls; violations of, or noncompliance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, or ethical standards; and external influences such as market conditions, fraudulent activities, disasters, and security risks. We continuously strive to strengthen our system of internal controls to ensure compliance with laws, rules, and regulations, and to improve the oversight of our operational risk. For example, we actively and continuously monitor cyber-attacks such as attempts related to eFraud and loss of sensitive customer data. We evaluate internal systems, processes and controls to mitigate loss from cyber-attacks and, to date, have not experienced any material losses.

To mitigate operational risks, we have established a senior management Operational Risk Committee and a senior management Legal, Regulatory, and Compliance Committee. The responsibilities of these committees, among other duties, include establishing and maintaining management information systems to monitor material risks and to identify potential concerns, risks, or trends that may have a significant impact and ensuring that recommendations are developed to address the identified issues. Both of these committees report any significant findings and recommendations to the Risk Management Committee. Additionally, potential concerns may be escalated to our ROC, as appropriate.

39


Table of Contents

The goal of this framework is to implement effective operational risk techniques and strategies, minimize operational and fraud losses, and enhance our overall performance.

Representation and Warranty Reserve

We primarily conduct our mortgage loan sale and securitization activity with FNMA and FHLMC. In connection with these and other securitization transactions, we make certain representations and warranties that the loans meet certain criteria, such as collateral type and underwriting standards. We may be required to repurchase individual loans and / or indemnify these organizations against losses due to a loan not meeting the established criteria. We have a reserve for such losses, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities. The reserves are estimated based on historical and expected repurchase activity, average loss rates, and current economic trends. The level of mortgage loan repurchase losses depends upon economic factors, investor demand strategies and other external conditions containing a level of uncertainty and risk that may change over the life of the underlying loans. We currently do not have sufficient information to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss related to representation and warranty exposure.

The table below reflects activity in the representations and warranties reserve:

Table 26 - Summary of Reserve for Representations and Warranties on Mortgage Loans Serviced for Others

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

First Fourth Third Second First

Reserve for representations and warranties, beginning of period

$ 28,588 $ 27,468 $ 26,298 $ 24,802 $ 23,218

Reserve charges

(2,470 ) (3,062 ) (2,833 ) (2,677 ) (2,056 )

Provision for representations and warranties

2,814 4,182 4,003 4,173 3,640

Reserve for representations and warranties, end of period

$ 28,932 $ 28,588 $ 27,468 $ 26,298 $ 24,802

Table 27 - Mortgage Loan Repurchase Statistics

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

First Fourth Third Second First

Number of loans sold

5,798 7,696 6,093 5,935 6,621

Amount of loans sold (UPB)

$ 846,419 $ 1,124,286 $ 992,310 $ 890,592 $ 1,008,055

Number of loans repurchased (1)

46 79 44 55 41

Amount of loans repurchased (UPB) (1)

$ 5,874 $ 9,563 $ 5,721 $ 8,998 $ 4,841

Number of claims received

146 166 139 227 134

Successful dispute rate (2)

62 % 45 % 44 % 48 % 46 %

Number of make whole payments (3)

29 48 39 47 33

Amount of make whole payments (3)

$ 2,274 $ 2,876 $ 2,815 $ 2,130 $ 1,611

(1)

Loans repurchased are loans that fail to meet the purchaser’s terms.

(2)

Successful disputes are a percent of close out requests.

(3)

Make whole payments are payments to reimburse for losses on foreclosed properties.

Foreclosure Documentation

Compared to the high volume servicers, we service a relatively low volume of residential mortgage foreclosures. We have reviewed our residential foreclosure process. We have not found evidence of financial injury to any borrowers from any foreclosure by the Bank that should not have proceeded. We continuously review our processes and controls to ensure that our foreclosure processes are appropriate.

40


Table of Contents

Compliance Risk

Financial institutions are subject to several laws, rules, and regulations at both the federal and state levels. These broad-based mandates include, but are not limited to, expectations relating to anti-money laundering, lending limits, client privacy, fair lending, and community reinvestment. Additionally, the volume and complexity of recent regulatory changes have increased our overall compliance risk. As such, we utilize various resources to help ensure expectations are met, including a team of compliance experts dedicated to ensuring our conformance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Our colleagues receive training for several broad-based laws and regulations including, but not limited to, anti-money laundering and customer privacy. Additionally, colleagues engaged in lending activities receive training for laws and regulations related to flood disaster protection, equal credit opportunity, fair lending, and / or other courses related to the extension of credit. We set a high standard of expectation for adherence to compliance management and seek to continuously enhance our performance.

Capital

Both regulatory capital and shareholders’ equity are managed at the Bank and on a consolidated basis. We have an active program for managing capital and maintain a comprehensive process for assessing the Company’s overall capital adequacy. We believe our current levels of both regulatory capital and shareholders’ equity are adequate.

Regulatory Capital

BASEL III and the Dodd-Frank Act

In June 2012, the FRB, OCC, and FDIC (collectively, the Agencies) each issued NPRs that would revise and replace the Agencies’ current capital rules to align with the BASEL III capital standards and meet certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. Certain requirements of the NPRs would establish more restrictive capital definitions, higher risk-weightings for certain asset classes, capital buffers and higher minimum capital ratios. The NPRs were in a comment period through October 22, 2012, and those comments are currently being evaluated by the Agencies. In late 2012, the Agencies announced that implementation of the BASEL III requirements would be delayed as certain aspects of the NPRs were to be enacted in 2013.

At the time of the NPR release, we evaluated the impact of the NPRs as proposed on our regulatory capital ratios and estimated a reduction of approximately 150 basis points to our BASEL I Tier I Common risk-based capital ratio based on our June 30, 2012, balance sheet composition. We anticipate that our capital ratios, on a BASEL III basis, would continue to exceed the well-capitalized minimum requirements. We are evaluating options to mitigate the capital impact of the NPRs and will provide further guidance upon issuance of the final rules by the Agencies.

Capital Planning

In 2012, we participated in the FRB’s CapPR process and made our capital plan submission in January 2013. On March 14, 2013, we announced that the FRB had completed its review of our capital plan submission and did not object to our proposed capital actions. The planned actions included the potential repurchase of up to $227.0 million of common stock and an increase of our common per share dividend from $0.04 to $0.05 through the 2014 first quarter.

We will be subject to the Federal Reserve’s supervisory stress tests beginning in late 2013. In October 2012, the OCC issued its Annual Stress Test final rule. In that ruling, the OCC stipulated it will consult closely with the Federal Reserve to provide common stress scenarios for use at both the depository institution and holding company levels. The OCC has deferred the requirement for us to complete separate annual stress tests at the bank-level until 2013.

Capital Adequacy

The FRB establishes capital adequacy requirements, including well-capitalized standards for the Company. The OCC establishes similar capital adequacy requirements and standards for the Bank. Regulatory capital primarily consists of Tier 1 risk-based capital and Tier 2 risk-based capital. The sum of Tier 1 risk-based capital and Tier 2 risk-based capital equals our total risk-based capital.

Risk-based capital guidelines require a minimum level of capital as a percentage of “risk-weighted assets”. Risk-weighted assets consist of total assets plus certain off-balance sheet and market items, subject to adjustment for predefined credit risk factors. At March 31, 2013, both the Company and the Bank were well-capitalized under applicable regulatory capital adequacy guidelines.

Tier 1 common equity, a non-GAAP financial measure, is used by banking regulators, investors and analysts to assess and compare the quality and composition of our capital with the capital of other financial services companies. We use Tier 1 common equity, along with the other capital measures, to assess and monitor our capital position. Tier 1 common equity is defined as Tier 1 capital less elements of Tier 1 capital not in the form of common equity (e.g. perpetual preferred stock, noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries, and trust preferred capital debt securities).

41


Table of Contents

The following table presents risk-weighted assets and other financial data necessary to calculate certain financial ratios, including the Tier 1 common equity ratio, which we use to measure capital adequacy:

Table 28 - Capital Adequacy

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,

Consolidated capital calculations:

Common shareholders’ equity

$ 5,481 $ 5,404 $ 5,422 $ 5,263 $ 5,164

Preferred shareholders’ equity

386 386 386 386 386

Total shareholders’ equity

5,867 5,790 5,808 5,649 5,550

Goodwill

(444 ) (444 ) (444 ) (444 ) (444 )

Other intangible assets

(124 ) (132 ) (144 ) (159 ) (171 )

Other intangible assets deferred tax liability (1)

43 46 50 56 60

Total tangible equity (2)

5,342 5,260 5,270 5,102 4,995

Preferred shareholders’ equity

(386 ) (386 ) (386 ) (386 ) (386 )

Total tangible common equity (2)

$ 4,956 $ 4,874 $ 4,884 $ 4,716 $ 4,609

Total assets

$ 56,055 $ 56,153 $ 56,443 $ 56,623 $ 55,877

Goodwill

(444 ) (444 ) (444 ) (444 ) (444 )

Other intangible assets

(124 ) (132 ) (144 ) (159 ) (171 )

Other intangible assets deferred tax liability (1)

43 46 50 56 60

Total tangible assets (2)

$ 55,530 $ 55,623 $ 55,905 $ 56,076 $ 55,322

Tier 1 capital

$ 5,829 $ 5,741 $ 5,720 $ 5,714 $ 5,709

Preferred shareholders’ equity

(386 ) (386 ) (386 ) (386 ) (386 )

Trust preferred securities

(299 ) (299 ) (335 ) (449 ) (532 )

REIT preferred stock

(50 ) (50 ) (50 ) (50 ) (50 )

Tier 1 common equity (2)

$ 5,094 $ 5,006 $ 4,949 $ 4,829 $ 4,741

Risk-weighted assets (RWA)

$ 47,937 $ 47,773 $ 48,147 $ 47,890 $ 46,716

Tier 1 common equity / RWA ratio (2)

10.62 % 10.48 % 10.28 % 10.08 % 10.15 %

Tangible equity / tangible asset ratio (2)

9.62 9.46 9.43 9.10 9.03

Tangible common equity / tangible asset ratio (2)

8.92 8.76 8.74 8.41 8.33

Tangible common equity / RWA ratio (2)

10.34 10.20 10.14 9.85 9.86

(1)

Other intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.

(2)

Tangible equity, Tier 1 common equity, tangible common equity, and tangible assets are non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, any ratios utilizing these financial measures are also non-GAAP. These financial measures have been included as they are considered to be critical metrics with which to analyze and evaluate financial condition and capital strength. Other companies may calculate these financial measures differently.

Our Tier 1 common equity risk-based ratio improved 14 basis points to 10.62% at March 31, 2013, compared with 10.48% at December 31, 2012. This increase primarily reflected the combination of an increase in retained earnings, partially offset by the repurchase of 4.7 million common shares and the impacts related to the payments of dividends.

42


Table of Contents

The following table presents certain regulatory capital data at both the consolidated and Bank levels for each of the past five quarters:

Table 29 - Regulatory Capital Data

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,

Total risk-weighted assets

Consolidated $ 47,937 $ 47,773 $ 48,147 $ 47,890 $ 46,716
Bank 47,842 47,676 48,033 47,786 46,498

Tier 1 risk-based capital

Consolidated 5,829 5,741 5,720 5,714 5,709
Bank 5,162 5,003 4,818 4,636 4,437

Tier 2 risk-based capital

Consolidated 1,144 1,187 1,192 1,190 1,186
Bank 947 1,091 1,196 1,294 1,372

Total risk-based capital

Consolidated 6,973 6,928 6,912 6,904 6,895
Bank 6,109 6,094 6,014 5,930 5,809

Tier 1 leverage ratio

Consolidated 10.57 % 10.36 % 10.29 % 10.34 % 10.55 %
Bank 9.38 9.05 8.68 8.42 8.24

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio

Consolidated 12.16 12.02 11.88 11.93 12.22
Bank 10.79 10.49 10.03 9.70 9.54

Total risk-based capital ratio

Consolidated 14.55 14.50 14.36 14.42 14.76
Bank 12.77 12.78 12.52 12.41 12.49

The increase in our consolidated Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios compared with December 31, 2012, primarily reflected an increase in retained earnings, partially offset by the repurchase of 4.7 million common shares and the impacts related to the payments of dividends.

Shareholders’ Equity

We generate shareholders’ equity primarily through the retention of earnings, net of dividends. Other potential sources of shareholders’ equity include issuances of common and preferred stock. Our objective is to maintain capital at an amount commensurate with our risk profile and risk tolerance objectives, to meet both regulatory and market expectations, and to provide the flexibility needed for future growth and business opportunities. Shareholders’ equity totaled $5.9 billion at March 31, 2013, representing a $0.1 billion, or 1%, increase compared with December 31, 2012, primarily reflecting an increase in retained earnings.

Dividends

We consider disciplined capital management as a key objective, with dividends representing one component. Our strong capital ratios and expectations for continued earnings growth positions us to continue to actively explore additional capital management opportunities.

On April 17, 2013, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per common share, payable on July 1, 2013. Also, cash dividends of $0.04 per share were declared on January 17, 2013. Our 2013 capital plan to the FRB (see Capital Planning section above) included quarterly common dividends of $0.05 per common share through the 2014 first quarter.

On April 17, 2013, our board of directors also declared a quarterly cash dividend on our 8.50% Series A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock of $21.25 per share. The dividend is payable on July 15, 2013. Also, cash dividends of $21.25 per share were declared on January 17, 2013.

On April 17, 2013, our board of directors also declared a quarterly cash dividend on our Floating Rate Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock of $7.44 per share. The dividend is payable on July 15, 2013. Also, cash dividends of $7.51 per share were declared on January 17, 2013.

Share Repurchases

From time to time the Board authorizes the Company to repurchase shares of our common stock. Although we announce when the Board authorizes share repurchases, we typically do not give any public notice before we repurchase our shares. Future stock repurchases may be private or open-market repurchases, including block transactions, accelerated or delayed block transactions, forward transactions, and similar transactions. Various factors determine the amount and timing of our share repurchases, including our capital requirements, the number of shares we expect to issue for employee benefit plans and acquisitions, market conditions (including the trading price of our stock), and regulatory and legal considerations, including the FRB’s response to our capital plan.

Our board of directors has authorized a share repurchase program consistent with our capital plan of the potential repurchase of up to $227.0 million of common stock. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, we repurchased 4.7 million common shares at a weighted average share price of $7.07.

43


Table of Contents

Fair Value

Fair Value Measurements

The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value inherently result in a higher degree of financial statement volatility. We estimate the fair value of a financial instrument using a variety of valuation methods. Where financial instruments are actively traded and have quoted market prices, quoted market prices are used for fair value. We characterize active markets as those where transaction volumes are sufficient to provide objective pricing information, with reasonably narrow bid/ask spreads, and where received quoted prices do not vary widely. When the financial instruments are not actively traded, other observable market inputs, such as quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, may be used, if available, to determine fair value. Inactive markets are characterized by low transaction volumes, price quotations that vary substantially among market participants, or in which minimal information is released publicly. When observable market prices do not exist, we estimate fair value primarily by using cash flow and other financial modeling methods. Our valuation methods consider factors such as liquidity and concentration concerns and, for the derivatives portfolio, counterparty credit risk. Other factors such as model assumptions, market dislocations, and unexpected correlations can affect estimates of fair value. Changes in these underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates in any of these areas could materially impact the amount of revenue or loss recorded.

The FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of financial instruments that considers the attributes specific to particular assets or liabilities and establishes a three-level hierarchy for determining fair value based on the transparency of inputs to each valuation as of the fair value measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 – inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices of identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 – inputs that are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

At the end of each quarter, we assess the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. As necessary, assets or liabilities may be transferred within hierarchy levels due to changes in availability of observable market inputs at the measurement date. The fair values measured at each level of the fair value hierarchy, additional discussion regarding fair value measurements, and a brief description of how fair value is determined for categories that have unobservable inputs, can be found in Note 13 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

44


Table of Contents

BUSINESS SEGMENT DISCUSSION

Overview

We have four major business segments: Retail and Business Banking; Regional and Commercial Banking; Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate; and Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending. A Treasury / Other function also includes our insurance business and other unallocated assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. While this section reviews financial performance from a business segment perspective, it should be read in conjunction with the Discussion of Results of Operations, Note 18 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and other sections for a full understanding of our consolidated financial performance.

Business segment results are determined based upon our management reporting system, which assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each of the business segments. The process is designed around our organizational and management structure and, accordingly, the results derived are not necessarily comparable with similar information published by other financial institutions.

Optimal Customer Relationship (OCR)

Our OCR initiative is a cross-business segment strategy designed to increase overall customer profitability and retention by deepening product and service penetration to consumer and commercial customers. We believe this can be accomplished by taking our broad array of services and products and delivering them through a rigorous and disciplined sales management process that is consistent across all business segments and regions. It is also supported by robust sales and referral technology.

OCR was introduced in late 2009. Through 2010, much of the effort was spent on defining processes, sales training, and systems development to fully capture and measure OCR performance metrics. In 2011, we introduced OCR-related metrics for commercial relationships, which complements the previously disclosed consumer OCR-related metrics. In 2013, we continue to experience strong consumer household and commercial relationship growth.

CONSUMER OCR PERFORMANCE

For consumer OCR performance, there are three key performance metrics: (1) the number of checking account households, (2) the number of services penetration per consumer checking account household, and (3) the revenue generated. Consumer households from all business segments are included.

The growth in consumer checking account number of households is a result of both new sales of checking accounts and improved retention of existing checking account households. The overall objective is to grow the number of households, along with an increase in product penetration.

We use the checking account since it typically represents the primary banking relationship product. We count additional products by type, not number of products. For example, a household that has one checking account and one mortgage, we count as having two services. A household with four checking accounts, we count as having one service. The household relationship utilizing four or more services is viewed to be more profitable and loyal. The overall objective, therefore, is to decrease the percentage of 1-3 services per consumer checking account household, while increasing the percentage of those with 4 or more services. We have made significant strides toward our 4+ cross-sell threshold and as we hold ourselves to a higher performance standard, we plan to increase our goals and measurement to drive 6+ products and services for our consumer customers.

The following table presents consumer checking account household OCR metrics:

Table 30 - Consumer Checking Household OCR Cross-sell Report

2013 2012
First Fourth Third Second First

Number of households

1,265,086 1,228,812 1,203,508 1,167,413 1,134,444

Product Penetration by Number of Services (1)

1 Service

2.7 % 3.1 % 4.3 % 3.6 % 3.7 %

2-3 Services

17.3 18.6 19.8 20.4 21.2

4+ Services

80.0 78.3 75.9 76.0 75.1

Total revenue (in millions)

$ 239.4 $ 251.2 $ 246.0 $ 249.7 $ 236.5

(1) The definitions and measurements used in our OCR process are periodically reviewed.

45


Table of Contents

Our emphasis on cross-sell, coupled with customers increasingly being attracted by the benefits offered through our “Fair Play” banking philosophy with programs such as 24-Hour Grace ® on overdrafts and Asterisk-Free Checking™, are having a positive effect. The percent of consumer households with 4 or more products at the end of the 2013 first quarter was 80.0%, up from 78.3% at the end of last year. For 2013, consumer household checking accounts grew at an 11.8% annualized rate. Total consumer checking account household revenue in the 2013 first quarter was $239.4 million, down $11.8 million, or 5%, from the 2012 fourth quarter, primarily related to typical seasonality and the February 2013 implementation of a new posting order for consumer transaction accounts. Total consumer checking account household revenue was up $2.9 million, or 1%, from the year-ago.

COMMERCIAL OCR PERFORMANCE

For commercial OCR performance, there are three key performance metrics: (1) the number of commercial relationships, (2) the number of services penetration per commercial relationship, and (3) the revenue generated. Commercial relationships include relationships from all business segments.

The growth in the number of commercial relationships is a result of both new sales of checking accounts and improved retention of existing commercial accounts. The overall objective is to grow the number of relationships, along with an increase in product service distribution.

The commercial relationship is defined as a business banking or commercial banking customer with a checking account relationship. We use this metric because we believe that the checking account anchors a business relationship and creates the opportunity to increase our cross-sell. Multiple sales of the same type of product are counted as one product, the same as consumer.

The following table presents commercial relationship OCR metrics:

Table 31 - Commercial Relationship OCR Cross-sell Report

2013 2012
First Fourth Third Second First

Commercial Relationships (1)

155,584 151,083 149,333 147,190 142,947

Product Penetration by Number of Services (2)

1 Service

23.7 % 24.6 % 25.9 % 26.5 % 27.2 %

2-3 Services

40.2 40.4 40.6 40.9 40.2

4+ Services

36.1 35.0 33.5 32.6 32.7

Total revenue (in millions)

$ 175.1 $ 189.8 $ 175.7 $ 189.2 $ 169.7

(1) Checking account required.
(2) The definitions and measurements used in our OCR process are periodically reviewed.

46


Table of Contents

By focusing on targeted relationships we are able to achieve higher product service distribution among our commercial relationships, but leverage these relationships to generate a deeper share of wallet. The percent of commercial relationships utilizing 4 or more products at the end of 2013 first quarter was 36.1%, up from 35.0% from the prior year. For the first three-month period of 2013, commercial relationships grew a 11.9% annualized rate. Total commercial relationship revenue in the 2013 first quarter was $175.1 million, down $14.7 million, 8%, from the 2012 fourth quarter. This was due to lower commercial customer transaction volumes.

Revenue Sharing

Revenue is recorded in the business segment responsible for the related product or service. Fee sharing is recorded to allocate portions of such revenue to other business segments involved in selling to, or providing service to, customers. Results of operations for the business segments reflect these fee sharing allocations.

Expense Allocation

The management accounting process that develops the business segment reporting utilizes various estimates and allocation methodologies to measure the performance of the business segments. Expenses are allocated to business segments using a two-phase approach. The first phase consists of measuring and assigning unit costs (activity-based costs) to activities related to product origination and servicing. These activity-based costs are then extended, based on volumes, with the resulting amount allocated to business segments that own the related products. The second phase consists of the allocation of overhead costs to all four business segments from Treasury / Other. We utilize a full-allocation methodology, where all Treasury / Other expenses, except those related to our insurance business, reported Significant Items (except for the goodwill impairment), and a small amount of other residual unallocated expenses, are allocated to the four business segments.

Funds Transfer Pricing (FTP)

We use an active and centralized FTP methodology to attribute appropriate net interest income to the business segments. The intent of the FTP methodology is to eliminate all interest rate risk from the business segments by providing matched duration funding of assets and liabilities. The result is to centralize the financial impact, management, and reporting of interest rate and liquidity risk in the Treasury / Other function where it can be centrally monitored and managed. The Treasury / Other function charges (credits) an internal cost of funds for assets held in (or pays for funding provided by) each business segment. The FTP rate is based on prevailing market interest rates for comparable duration assets (or liabilities), and includes an estimate for the cost of liquidity (liquidity premium). Deposits of an indeterminate maturity receive an FTP credit based on a combination of vintage-based average lives and replicating portfolio pool rates. Other assets, liabilities, and capital are charged (credited) with a four-year moving average FTP rate. The denominator in the net interest margin calculation has been modified to add the amount of net funds provided by each business segment for all periods presented.

Treasury / Other

The Treasury / Other function includes revenue and expense related to our insurance business, and assets, liabilities, and equity not directly assigned or allocated to one of the four business segments. Other assets include investment securities and bank owned life insurance. The financial impact associated with our FTP methodology, as described above, is also included.

Net interest income includes the impact of administering our investment securities portfolios and the net impact of derivatives used to hedge interest rate sensitivity. Noninterest income includes insurance income, miscellaneous fee income not allocated to other business segments, such as bank owned life insurance income and any investment security and trading asset gains or losses. Noninterest expense includes any insurance-related expenses, as well as certain corporate administrative, merger, and other miscellaneous expenses not allocated to other business segments. The provision for income taxes for the business segments is calculated at a statutory 35% tax rate, though our overall effective tax rate is lower. As a result, Treasury / Other reflects a credit for income taxes representing the difference between the lower actual effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate used to allocate income taxes to the business segments.

The $27.8 million, or 295%, year over year increase in net income for Treasury/Other was primarily the result of the FTP process described above; partially offset by an increase in personnel costs.

47


Table of Contents

Net Income by Business Segment

We reported net income of $151.8 million during the first three-month period of 2013. This compared with net income of $153.3 million during the first three-month period of 2012. The segregation of net income by business segment for the first three-month period of 2013 and 2012 is presented in the following table:

Table 32 - Net Income by Business Segment

Three Months Ended March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Retail and Business Banking

$ 13,125 $ 17,457

Regional and Commercial Banking

35,444 24,042

AFCRE

43,562 83,502

WGH

22,450 18,856

Treasury/Other

37,199 9,413

Total net income

$ 151,780 $ 153,270

Average Loans/Leases and Deposits by Business Segment

The segregation of total average loans and leases and total average deposits by business segment for the first three-month period of 2013 is presented in the following table:

Table 33 - Average Loans/Leases and Deposits by Business Segment

Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

(dollar amounts in millions)

Retail and
Business Banking
Regional and
Commercial
Banking
AFCRE WGH Treasury /
Other
TOTAL

Average Loans/Leases

Commercial and industrial

$ 3,420 $ 10,556 $ 2,310 $ 609 $ 59 $ 16,954

Commercial real estate

434 411 4,247 200 5,292

Total commercial

3,854 10,967 6,557 809 59 22,246

Automobile

4,834 (1 ) 4,833

Home equity

7,543 8 1 870 (27 ) 8,395

Residential mortgage

977 7 3,995 (1 ) 4,978

Other consumer

319 5 62 38 (12 ) 412

Total consumer

8,839 20 4,897 4,903 (41 ) 18,618

Total loans and leases

$ 12,693 $ 10,987 $ 11,454 $ 5,712 $ 18 $ 40,864

Average Deposits

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 5,137 $ 3,267 $ 551 $ 2,903 $ 307 $ 12,165

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

4,745 96 51 1,079 6 5,977

Money market deposits

8,179 2,038 246 4,573 9 15,045

Savings and other domestic deposits

4,897 13 11 163 (1 ) 5,083

Core certificates of deposit

5,234 24 2 81 5 5,346

Total core deposits

28,192 5,438 861 8,799 326 43,616

Other deposits

139 230 61 824 1,143 2,397

Total deposits

$ 28,331 $ 5,668 $ 922 $ 9,623 $ 1,469 $ 46,013

48


Table of Contents

Retail and Business Banking

Table 34 - Key Performance Indicators for Retail and Business Banking

Three Months Ended March 31, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Net interest income

$ 205,240 $ 221,301 $ (16,061 ) (7 )%

Provision for credit losses

32,547 48,839 (16,292 ) (33 )

Noninterest income

87,266 89,256 (1,990 ) (2 )

Noninterest expense

239,766 234,861 4,905 2

Provision for income taxes

7,068 9,400 (2,332 ) (25 )

Net income

$ 13,125 $ 17,457 $ (4,332 ) (25 )%

Number of employees (full-time equivalent)

5,815 5,390 425 8 %

Total average assets (in millions)

$ 14,400 $ 13,957 $ 443 3

Total average loans/leases (in millions)

12,693 12,434 259 2

Total average deposits (in millions)

28,331 27,467 864 3

Net interest margin

2.96 % 3.24 % (0.28 )% (9 )

NCOs

$ 30,250 $ 38,615 $ (8,365 ) (22 )

NCOs as a % of average loans and leases

0.95 % 1.24 % (0.29 )% (23 )

Return on average common equity

3.7 5.0 (1.3 ) (26 )

2013 First Three Months vs. 2012 First Three Months

Retail and Business Banking reported net income of $13.1 million in the first three-month period of 2013. This was a decrease of $4.3 million, or 25%, when compared to the year-ago period. The decrease in net income reflected a combination of factors described below.

The decrease in net interest income from the year-ago period reflected:

28 basis points decrease in the net interest margin. This decrease was mainly due to a decrease in deposit spreads that resulted from a reduction in the FTP rates assigned to those deposits.

Partially offset by:

14 basis points increase in loan spreads combined with $0.3 billion, or 2%, increase in total average loans and leases, along with a $0.9 billion, or 3%, increase in total average deposits.

The increase in total average loans and leases from the year-ago period reflected:

$0.2 billion, or 6%, increase in commercial loans.

The increase in total average deposits from the year-ago period reflected:

$1.0 billion, or 10%, increase in demand deposits.

$0.8 billion, or 10%, increase in money market deposits.

Partially offset by:

$1.1 billion, or 18%, decrease in core certificate of deposits, which reflected continued focus on product mix in reducing the overall cost of deposits.

49


Table of Contents

The decrease in the provision for credit losses from the year-ago period reflected:

A continued improvement in the credit quality of the portfolio, as evidenced by a 29 basis point reduction in NCOs and a $18 million decline in NALs.

The decrease in noninterest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$2.2 million decline related to miscellaneous other fee income items.

$2.0 million, or 38%, decrease in gain on sale of loans and loan servicing revenue.

Partially offset by:

$2.5 million, or 5%, increase in deposit service charge income due to strong household and account growth in the checking portfolio that more than offset a $4.9 million decline in service charges from a change in overdraft posting order.

$2.1 million, or 11%, increase in electronic banking income, also due to strong consumer household growth.

The increase in noninterest expense from the year-ago period reflected:

$4.3 million, or 6%, increase in personnel costs primarily related to the expansion of our Giant Eagle and Meijer in-store branch network.

$3.0 million, or 4%, increase in allocated overhead expense.

Partially offset by:

$2.6 million, or 20%, lower marketing expense.

50


Table of Contents

Regional and Commercial Banking

Table 35 - Key Performance Indicators for Regional and Commercial Banking

Three Months Ended March 31, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Net interest income

$ 69,399 $ 64,202 $ 5,197 8 %

Provision (reduction in allowance) for credit losses

(7,243 ) 13,280 (20,523 ) (155 )

Noninterest income

30,302 31,933 (1,631 ) (5 )

Noninterest expense

52,415 45,867 6,548 14

Provision for income taxes

19,085 12,946 6,139 47

Net income

$ 35,444 $ 24,042 $ 11,402 47 %

Number of employees (full-time equivalent)

741 669 72 11 %

Total average assets (in millions)

$ 11,800 $ 10,259 $ 1,541 15

Total average loans/leases (in millions)

10,987 9,250 1,737 19

Total average deposits (in millions)

5,668 4,680 988 21

Net interest margin

2.66 % 2.83 % (0.17 )% (6 )

NCOs

$ (3,933 ) $ 13,642 $ (17,575 ) (129 )

NCOs as a % of average loans and leases

(0.14 )% 0.59 % (0.73 )% (124 )

Return on average common equity

14.6 12.0 2.6 22

2013 First Three Months vs. 2012 First Three Months

Regional and Commercial Banking reported net income of $35.4 million in the first three-month period of 2013. This was an increase of $11.4 million, or 47%, compared to the year-ago period. The increase in net income reflected a combination of factors described below.

The increase in net interest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$1.7 billion, or 19%, increase in total average loans and leases.

$1.0 billion, or 21%, increase in average total deposits.

Partially offset by:

17 basis point decrease in the net interest margin due to compressed deposit margins resulting from declining rates and reduced FTP rates, partially offset by a small increase on the commercial loan spread.

The increase in total average loans and leases from the year-ago period reflected:

$0.7 billion, or 47%, increase in the equipment finance portfolio average balance, which reflected our focus on developing vertical strategies in business aircraft, rail industry, lender finance, and syndications.

$0.4 billion, or 18%, increase in the large corporate portfolio average balance due to establishing relationships with targeted prospects within our footprint.

$0.4 billion, or 38%, increase in the healthcare portfolio average balance due to strategic focus on the banking needs of the healthcare industry, specifically targeting alternate site real estate, seniors’ real estate, medical technology, community hospitals, metro hospitals, and health care services.

51


Table of Contents

$0.3 billion, or 7%, increase in the general middle market portfolio average balance primarily in our major metro markets overcoming a $0.3 billion or 7% reduction in the funded balances of lines of credit due to a reduction in the average utilization rate.

$0.1 billion, or 180%, increase in the franchise finance portfolio average balance, reflecting a focused effort to become an approved lender for specific franchise businesses and establishing relationships with targeted prospects within our footprint.

Partially offset by:

$0.2 billion, or 43%, decrease in commercial loans managed by SAD, which reflected improved credit quality in the portfolio.

The increase in total average deposits from the year-ago period reflected:

$1.0 billion, or 23%, increase in core deposits, which primarily reflected a $0.6 billion increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits. Regional and Commercial Banking initiated a strategic focus to gain a deeper share of wallet with certain key relationships. This focus was specifically targeted to liquidity solutions for these customers and resulted in significant deposit growth. Middle market accounts, such as not-for-profit universities and healthcare, contributed $0.7 billion of the balance growth, while large corporate accounts contributed $0.3 billion.

The decrease in the provision for credit losses from the year-ago period reflected:

A continued improvement in the credit quality of the portfolio, as evidenced by a 73 basis point reduction in NCOs and a $42 million decline in NALs.

The decrease in noninterest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$1.8 million, or 17%, decrease in capital markets related income attributed to a $2.8 million, or 54%, decrease in sales of customer interest rate protection products, partially offset by a $0.9 million or 35% increase in foreign exchange revenue and a $0.1 million or 4% increase in institutional brokerage income driven by stronger underwriting fees and fixed-income commissions compared to the prior year.

$1.8 million, or 17%, decrease in deposit service charge income and other Treasury Management related revenue reflecting the impact of earnings credits by our customers.

Partially offset by:

$2.2 million increase related to miscellaneous other fee income items.

The increase in noninterest expense from the year-ago period reflected:

$4.6 million, or 19%, increase in personnel costs, primarily reflecting an 11% increase in FTE. This increase in personnel is attributable to our strategic investments in our core footprint markets, vertical strategies, and product capabilities.

$1.8 million, or 32%, increase in allocated overhead expense.

52


Table of Contents

Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate

Table 36 - Key Performance Indicators for Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate

Three Months Ended March 31, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Net interest income

$ 88,070 $ 90,330 $ (2,260 ) (3 )%

Provision (reduction in allowance) for credit losses

(7,504 ) (42,254 ) (34,750 ) (82 )

Noninterest income

8,355 34,719 (26,364 ) (76 )

Noninterest expense

36,911 38,839 (1,928 ) (5 )

Provision for income taxes

23,456 44,962 (21,506 ) (48 )

Net income

$ 43,562 $ 83,502 $ (39,940 ) (48 )%

Number of employees (full-time equivalent)

268 271 (3 ) (1 )%

Total average assets (in millions)

$ 12,140 $ 12,656 $ (516 ) (4 )

Total average loans/leases (in millions)

11,454 11,468 (14 ) (0 )

Total average deposits (in millions)

922 811 111 14

Net interest margin

2.92 % 2.83 % 0.09 % 3

NCOs

$ 15,448 $ 21,410 $ (5,962 ) (28 )

NCOs as a % of average loans and leases

0.54 % 0.75 % (0.21 )% (28 )

Return on average common equity

32.5 54.4 (21.9 ) (40 )

2013 First Three Months vs. 2012 First Three Months

AFCRE reported net income of $43.6 million in the first three-month period of 2013. This was a decrease of $39.9 million, or 48%, compared to the year-ago period. The decrease in net income reflected a combination of factors described below.

The decrease in net interest income from the year ago period reflected:

$0.6 billion, or 67%, decrease in average loans held for sale related to automobile loan securitization activities in the year-ago period.

Partially offset by:

9 basis point increase in the net interest margin. This increase primarily reflected purchase accounting adjustments related to certain acquired commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios, as well as the continuation of our risk-based pricing strategies in the CRE portfolio and maintaining our pricing discipline on indirect auto loan originations.

The increase in provision for credit losses from the year-ago period reflected:

A reduction in the levels of reserve releases associated with declines in non-performing loans. During the 2013 first quarter, NALs declined $12 million as compared to $34 million during the year-ago period.

The decrease in noninterest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$23.0 million, or 100%, decrease in gain on sale of loans resulting from the $23.0 million gain on securitization and sale of $1.3 billion of indirect auto loans in the 2012 first quarter.

$2.7 million, or 72%, decrease in operating lease income resulting from the continued runoff of that portfolio, as we exited that business at the end of 2008.

The decrease in noninterest expense from the year-ago period reflected:

$2.1 million, or 73%, decrease in operating lease expense resulting from the continued runoff of that portfolio.

53


Table of Contents

Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending

Table 37 - Key Performance Indicators for Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending

Three Months Ended March 31, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Net interest income

$ 43,668 $ 46,829 $ (3,161 ) (7 )%

Provision for credit losses

11,792 14,541 (2,749 ) (19 )

Noninterest income

94,654 87,638 7,016 8

Noninterest expense

91,992 90,917 1,075 1

Provision for income taxes

12,088 10,153 1,935 19

Net income

$ 22,450 $ 18,856 $ 3,594 19 %

Number of employees (full-time equivalent)

2,134 2,012 122 6 %

Total average assets (in millions)

$ 7,363 $ 7,500 $ (137 ) (2 )

Total average loans/leases (in millions)

5,712 5,920 (208 ) (4 )

Total average deposits (in millions)

9,623 9,450 173 2

Net interest margin

1.80 % 1.88 % (0.08 )% (4 )

NCOs

$ 9,639 $ 12,261 $ (2,622 ) (21 )

NCOs as a % of average loans and leases

0.68 % 0.83 % (0.15 )% (18 )

Return on average common equity

12.5 9.9 2.6 26

Mortgage banking origination volume (in millions)

$ 1,119 $ 1,157 $ (38 ) (3 )

Noninterest income shared with other business segments (1)

9,733 11,264 (1,531 ) (14 )

Total assets under management (in billions)—eop

17.1 15.0 2.1 14

Total trust assets (in billions)—eop

76.3 62.4 13.9 22

(1) Amount is not included in noninterest income reported above.

eop—End of Period.

2013 First Three Months vs. 2012 First Three Months

WGH reported net income of $22.5 million in the first three-month period of 2013. This was an increase of $3.6 million, or 19%, when compared to the year-ago period. The increase in net income reflected a combination of factors described below.

The decrease in net interest income from the year-ago period reflected:

8 basis point decrease in the net interest margin, primarily due to compressed deposit margins resulting from declining rates and reduced FTP rates.

$0.2 billion, or 4%, decrease in average total loans and leases.

Partially offset by:

$0.2 billion, or 2%, increase in average total deposits.

The decrease in provision for credit losses reflected:

A continued improvement in the credit quality of the portfolio, as evidenced by a 15 basis point reduction in NCOs and a $19 million decline in NALs.

The increase in noninterest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$8.2 million increase in other income, primarily due to a gain on sale of certain Low Income Housing Tax Credit investments.

54


Table of Contents

Partially offset by:

$1.7 million, or 4%, decrease in mortgage banking income due to lower in mortgage production and a higher percentage of mortgages retained on the balance sheet.

The increase in noninterest expense from the year-ago period reflected:

$0.7 million, or 1%, increase in personnel costs, which reflected higher sales commissions and loan origination costs primarily related to the increased mortgage origination volume.

$0.5 million, or 3%, increase in other expenses, primarily due to loan system conversion costs, increased mortgage volume, and an increase in allocated overhead expense.

55


Table of Contents

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

Forward-Looking Statements

This report, including MD&A, contains certain forward-looking statements, including certain plans, expectations, goals, projections, and statements, which are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Statements that do not describe historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as expect, anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, plan, target, goal, or similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as will, may, might, should, would, could, or similar variations. The forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained or implied in the forward-looking statements: (1) worsening of credit quality performance due to a number of factors such as the underlying value of collateral that could prove less valuable than otherwise assumed and assumed cash flows may be worse than expected; (2) changes in economic conditions, including impacts from the implementation of the Budget Control Act of 2011 as well as the continuing economic uncertainty in the US, the European Union, and other areas; (3) movements in interest rates; (4) competitive pressures on product pricing and services; (5) success, impact, and timing of our business strategies, including market acceptance of any new products or services introduced to implement our “Fair Play” banking philosophy; (6) changes in accounting policies and principles and the accuracy of our assumptions and estimates used to prepare our financial statements; (7) extended disruption of vital infrastructure; (8) the final outcome of significant litigation; (9) the nature, extent, timing and results of governmental actions, examinations, reviews, reforms, and regulations including those related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, OCC, Federal Reserve, and CFPB; and (10) the outcome of judicial and regulatory decisions regarding practices in the residential mortgage industry, including among other things the processes followed for foreclosing residential mortgages. Additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those described above can be found in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and documents subsequently filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and are based on information available at that time. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements were made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events except as required by federal securities laws. As forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, caution should be exercised against placing undue reliance on such statements.

Non-Regulatory Capital Ratios

In addition to capital ratios defined by banking regulators, the Company considers various other measures when evaluating capital utilization and adequacy, including:

Tangible common equity to tangible assets,

Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets using Basel I and proposed Basel III definitions, and

Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets using Basel I definition.

These non-regulatory capital ratios are viewed by management as useful additional methods of reflecting the level of capital available to withstand unexpected market conditions. Additionally, presentation of these ratios allows readers to compare the Company’s capitalization to other financial services companies. These ratios differ from capital ratios defined by banking regulators principally in that the numerator excludes preferred securities, the nature and extent of which varies among different financial services companies. These ratios are not defined in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) or federal banking regulations. As a result, these non-regulatory capital ratios disclosed by the Company may be considered non-GAAP financial measures.

Because there are no standardized definitions for these non-regulatory capital ratios, the Company’s calculation methods may differ from those used by other financial services companies. Also, there may be limits in the usefulness of these measures to investors. As a result, the Company encourages readers to consider the consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in this Form 10-Q in their entirety, and not to rely on any single financial measure.

Risk Factors

Information on risk is discussed in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A of our 2012 Form 10-K. Additional information regarding risk factors can also be found in the Risk Management and Capital discussion of this report.

56


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Significant Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to establish critical accounting policies and make accounting estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect amounts recorded and reported in our financial statements. Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2012 Form 10-K as supplemented by this report lists significant accounting policies we use in the development and presentation of our financial statements. This MD&A, the significant accounting policies, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables and other qualitative and quantitative factors necessary for an understanding and evaluation of our company, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

An accounting estimate requires assumptions about uncertain matters that could have a material effect on the financial statements if a different amount within a range of estimates were used or if estimates changed from period to period. Estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time, and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce results that significantly differ from when those estimates were made.

Our most significant accounting estimates relate to our ACL, income taxes and deferred tax assets, and fair value measurements of investment securities, goodwill, pension, and other real estate owned. These significant accounting estimates and their related application are discussed in our 2012 Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments

Note 2 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting pronouncements adopted during 2013 and the expected impact of accounting pronouncements recently issued but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affect financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable section of this MD&A and the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

57


Table of Contents

Item 1: Financial Statements

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands, except number of shares)

March 31, December 31,

Assets

Cash and due from banks

$ 828,688 $ 1,262,806

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

71,317 70,921

Trading account securities

86,520 91,205

Loans held for sale (includes $415,126 and $452,949 respectively, measured at fair value) (1)

729,707 764,309

Available-for-sale and other securities

7,504,639 7,566,175

Held-to-maturity securities

1,693,074 1,743,876

Loans and leases (includes $116,039 and $142,762 respectively, measured at fair value) (2)

41,283,524 40,728,425

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(746,769 ) (769,075 )

Net loans and leases

40,536,755 39,959,350

Bank owned life insurance

1,609,610 1,596,056

Premises and equipment

620,833 617,257

Goodwill

444,268 444,268

Other intangible assets

124,236 132,157

Accrued income and other assets

1,805,319 1,904,805

Total assets

$ 56,054,966 $ 56,153,185

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Liabilities

Deposits

$ 46,867,141 $ 46,252,683

Short-term borrowings

732,705 589,814

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

183,491 1,008,959

Other long-term debt

156,301 158,784

Subordinated notes

1,188,674 1,197,091

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

1,059,516 1,155,643

Total liabilities

50,187,828 50,362,974

Shareholders’ equity

Preferred stock—authorized 6,617,808 shares:

Series A, 8.50% fixed rate, non-cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock, par value of $0.01, and liquidation value per share of $1,000

362,507 362,507

Series B, floating rate, non-voting, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, par value of $0.01, and liquidation value per share of $1,000

23,785 23,785

Common stock

8,401 8,441

Capital surplus

7,451,287 7,475,149

Less treasury shares, at cost

(11,141 ) (10,921 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(159,955 ) (150,817 )

Retained (deficit) earnings

(1,807,746 ) (1,917,933 )

Total shareholders’ equity

5,867,138 5,790,211

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 56,054,966 $ 56,153,185

Common shares authorized (par value of $0.01)

1,500,000,000 1,500,000,000

Common shares issued

840,087,217 844,105,349

Common shares outstanding

838,757,987 842,812,709

Treasury shares outstanding

1,329,230 1,292,640

Preferred shares issued

1,967,071 1,967,071

Preferred shares outstanding

398,007 398,007

(1) Amounts represent loans for which Huntington has elected the fair value option.
(2) Amounts represent certain assets and liabilities of a consolidated VIE for which Huntington has elected the fair value option.

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

58


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

2013 2012

Interest and fee income:

Loans and leases

$ 406,879 $ 412,048

Available-for-sale and other securities

Taxable

40,185 48,824

Tax-exempt

2,615 2,199

Held-to-maturity securities—taxable

9,838 4,714

Other

5,802 12,152

Total interest income

465,319 479,937

Interest expense:

Deposits

32,035 43,780

Short-term borrowings

234 583

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

301 222

Subordinated notes and other long-term debt

8,579 18,143

Total interest expense

41,149 62,728

Net interest income

424,170 417,209

Provision for credit losses

29,592 34,406

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

394,578 382,803

Service charges on deposit accounts

60,883 60,292

Mortgage banking

45,248 46,418

Trust services

31,160 30,906

Electronic banking

20,713 18,630

Brokerage

17,995 19,260

Insurance

19,252 18,875

Gain on sale of loans

2,616 26,770

Bank owned life insurance income

13,442 13,937

Capital markets fees

8,051 9,982

Net gains on sales of securities

187 624

Impairment losses recognized in earnings on available-for-sale securities

(696 ) (1,237 )

Other noninterest income

33,358 40,863

Total noninterest income

252,209 285,320

Personnel costs

258,895 243,498

Outside data processing and other services

49,265 42,592

Net occupancy

30,114 29,079

Equipment

24,880 25,545

Deposit and other insurance expense

15,490 20,738

Professional services

7,192 10,697

Marketing

10,971 13,569

Amortization of intangibles

10,320 11,531

OREO and foreclosure expense

2,666 4,950

Other noninterest expense

33,000 60,477

Total noninterest expense

442,793 462,676

Income before income taxes

203,994 205,447

Provision for income taxes

52,214 52,177

Net income

151,780 153,270

Dividends on preferred shares

7,970 8,049

Net income applicable to common shares

$ 143,810 $ 145,221

Average common shares—basic

841,103 864,499

Average common shares—diluted

848,708 869,164

Per common share:

Net income—basic

$ 0.17 $ 0.17

Net income—diluted

0.17 0.17

Cash dividends declared

0.04 0.04

OTTI losses for the periods presented:

Total OTTI losses

$ (696 ) $ (1,237 )

Noncredit-related portion of loss recognized in OCI

Impairment losses recognized in earnings on available-for-sale securities

$ (696 ) $ (1,237 )

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

59


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Net income

$ 151,780 $ 153,270

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale and other securities:

Non-credit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold

3,831 4,527

Unrealized net gains (losses) on available-for-sale and other securities arising during the period, net of reclassification for net realized gains

(5,347 ) 17,846

Total unrealized gains on available-for-sale and other securities

(1,516 ) 22,373

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivatives

(12,970 ) (9,669 )

Change in accumulated unrealized losses for pension and other post-retirement obligations

5,348 3,243

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(9,138 ) 15,947

Comprehensive income

$ 142,642 $ 169,217

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

60


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

Preferred Stock Accumulated
Series B Other Retained
(All amounts in thousands, Series A Floating Rate Common Stock Capital Treasury Stock Comprehensive Earnings

except for per share amounts)

Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Surplus Shares Amount Loss (Deficit) Total

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Balance, beginning of period

363 $ 362,507 35 $ 23,785 865,585 $ 8,656 $ 7,596,809 (1,178 ) $ (10,255 ) $ (173,763 ) $ (2,389,639 ) $ 5,418,100

Net income

153,270 153,270

Other comprehensive income (loss)

15,947 15,947

Cash dividends declared:

Common ($0.04 per share)

(34,588 ) (34,588 )

Preferred Series A ($21.25 per share)

(7,703 ) (7,703 )

Preferred Series B ($9.73 per share)

(346 ) (346 )

Recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation

5,303 5,303

Other share-based compensation activity

288 3 122 (20 ) 105

Other

(170 ) (21 ) 21 (111 ) (260 )

Balance, end of period

363 $ 362,507 35 $ 23,785 865,873 $ 8,659 $ 7,602,064 (1,199 ) $ (10,234 ) $ (157,816 ) $ (2,279,137 ) $ 5,549,828

Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

Balance, beginning of period

363 $ 362,507 35 $ 23,785 844,105 $ 8,441 $ 7,475,149 (1,292 ) $ (10,921 ) $ (150,817 ) $ (1,917,933 ) $ 5,790,211

Net income

151,780 151,780

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(9,138 ) (9,138 )

Repurchases of common stock

(4,738 ) (47 ) (33,553 ) (33,600 )

Cash dividends declared:

Common ($0.05 per share)

(33,569 ) (33,569 )

Preferred Series A ($21.25 per share)

(7,703 ) (7,703 )

Preferred Series B ($7.51 per share)

(267 ) (267 )

Recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation

8,021 8,021

Other share-based compensation activity

720 7 1,706 (83 ) 1,630

Other

(36 ) (37 ) (220 ) 29 (227 )

Balance, end of period

363 $ 362,507 35 $ 23,785 840,087 $ 8,401 $ 7,451,287 (1,329 ) $ (11,141 ) $ (159,955 ) $ (1,807,746 ) $ 5,867,138

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

61


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Operating activities

Net income

$ 151,780 $ 153,270

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Provision for credit losses

29,592 34,406

Depreciation and amortization

67,177 70,723

Share-based compensation expense

8,021 5,303

Change in deferred income taxes

49,939 62,119

Originations of loans held for sale

(798,655 ) (953,486 )

Principal payments on and proceeds from loans held for sale

865,553 1,008,227

Gain on sale of loans held for sale

(20,258 ) (10,417 )

Bargain purchase gain

(11,409 )

Net gain on sales of securities

(187 ) (624 )

Impairment losses recognized in earnings on available-for-sale securities

696 1,237

Net change in:

Trading account securities

4,685 (13,764 )

Accrued income and other assets

(11,734 ) (44,800 )

Accrued expense and other liabilities

(134,700 ) (23,515 )

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

211,909 277,270

Investing activities

Increase (decrease) in interest bearing deposits in banks

37,292 171

Net cash received from acquisition

40,310

Proceeds from:

Maturities and calls of available-for-sale and other securities

438,838 496,689

Maturities of held-to-maturity securities

50,136 18,089

Sales of available-for-sale and other securities

230,038 145,938

Purchases of available-for-sale and other securities

(618,975 ) (1,416,630 )

Net proceeds from sales of loans

39,150 1,397,343

Net loan and lease activity, excluding sales

(660,070 ) (1,077,171 )

Proceeds from sale of operating lease assets

3,786 8,970

Purchases of premises and equipment

(23,942 ) (29,342 )

Proceeds from sales of other real estate

9,206 5,545

Purchases of loans and leases

(21,541 ) (393,191 )

Other, net

401

Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities

(515,681 ) (803,279 )

Financing activities

Increase (decrease) in deposits

616,206 1,016,203

Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings

154,490 70,606

Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances

175,000

Maturity/redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank advances

(1,000,481 ) (351,235 )

Maturity/redemption of long-term debt

(2,086 ) (171,643 )

Dividends paid on preferred stock

(7,973 ) (7,703 )

Dividends paid on common stock

(33,683 ) (34,648 )

Repurchases of common stock

(33,600 )

Other, net

1,781 (322 )

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

(130,346 ) 521,258

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(434,118 ) (4,751 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,262,806 1,115,968

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 828,688 $ 1,111,217

Supplemental disclosures:

Income taxes paid (refunded)

$ 3,254 $ 3,117

Interest paid

38,312 73,353

Non-cash activities

Loans transferred to loans held for sale

26,316

Dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter

40,195 48,057

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

62


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Huntington reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals which are, in the opinion of Management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, the results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the SEC and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Huntington’s 2012 Form 10-K, which include descriptions of significant accounting policies, as updated by the information contained in this report, should be read in conjunction with these interim financial statements.

For statement of cash flows purposes, cash and cash equivalents are defined as the sum of “Cash and due from banks” which includes amounts on deposit with the Federal Reserve and “Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.”

In conjunction with applicable accounting standards, all material subsequent events have been either recognized in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosed in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATE

ASU 2011-11 — Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The ASU amends Topic 210 by requiring additional improved information to be disclosed regarding financial instruments and derivative instruments that are offset in accordance with the conditions under ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 810-10-45 or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments are effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The disclosures required by the amendments were applied retrospectively for all comparative periods presented (See Note 14). The amendments did not have a material impact on Huntington’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2013-01— Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities . The ASU amends Update 2011-11 to clarify that the scope applies to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or subject to master netting or similar arrangements. Other types of financial assets and liabilities subject to master netting or similar arrangements are not subject to the disclosure requirements in Update 2011-11. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods (See Note 14). The amendments did not have a material impact on Huntington’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2013-02— Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The ASU requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. The amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012 (See Note 8). The amendments did not have a material impact on Huntington’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3. LOANS / LEASES AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

Loans and leases for which Huntington has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until maturity or payoff, are classified in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as loans and leases. Except for loans which are accounted for at fair value, loans and leases are carried at the principal amount outstanding, net of unamortized deferred loan origination fees and costs and net of unearned income. At March 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of these net unamortized deferred loan origination fees and costs and net unearned income was $174.3 million and $174.5 million, respectively.

63


Table of Contents

Loan and Lease Portfolio Composition

The following table provides a detailed listing of Huntington’s loan and lease portfolio at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

March 31, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Loans and leases:

Commercial and industrial

$ 17,266,611 $ 16,970,689

Commercial real estate

5,058,876 5,399,240

Automobile

5,035,997 4,633,820

Home equity

8,473,654 8,335,342

Residential mortgage

5,050,884 4,969,672

Other consumer

397,502 419,662

Loans and leases

41,283,524 40,728,425

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(746,769 ) (769,075 )

Net loans and leases

$ 40,536,755 $ 39,959,350

As shown in the table above, the primary loan and lease portfolios are: C&I, CRE, automobile, home equity, residential mortgage, and other consumer. For ACL purposes, these portfolios are further disaggregated into classes. The classes within each portfolio are as follows:

Portfolio

Class

Commercial and industrial Owner occupied
Purchased credit-impaired
Other commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate Retail properties
Multi family
Office
Industrial and warehouse
Purchased credit-impaired
Other commercial real estate
Automobile NA (1)
Home equity Secured by first-lien
Secured by junior-lien
Residential mortgage Residential mortgage
Purchased credit-impaired
Other consumer Other consumer
Purchased credit-impaired

(1) Not applicable. The automobile loan portfolio is not further segregated into classes.

Fidelity Bank acquisition

(See Note 19 for additional information regarding the Fidelity Bank acquisition).

On March 30, 2012, Huntington acquired the loans of Fidelity Bank located in Dearborn, Michigan from the FDIC. Under the agreement, loans with a fair value of $523.9 million were transferred to Huntington. These loans were recorded at fair value in accordance with applicable accounting guidance, ASC 805. The fair values for the loans were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms (Level 3), and reflected an estimate of probable losses and the credit risk associated with the loans.

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans

Purchased loans with evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination for which it is probable at acquisition that we will be unable to collect all contractually required payments are considered to be credit impaired. Purchased credit-impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value, which is estimated by discounting the cash flows expected to be collected at the acquisition date. Because the estimate of expected cash flows reflects an estimate of future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loans, an allowance for credit losses is not recorded at the acquisition date. The excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value, referred to as the accretable yield, is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loan, or pool of loans, on a level-yield basis. The difference between the contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. A subsequent decrease in the estimate of cash flows expected to be received on purchased credit-impaired loans generally results in the recognition of an allowance for credit losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows result in reversal of any nonaccretable difference (or allowance for loan and lease losses to the extent any has been recorded) with a positive impact on interest income subsequently recognized. The measurement of cash flows involves assumptions and judgments for interest rates, prepayments, default rates, loss severity, and collateral values. All of these factors are inherently subjective and significant changes in the cash flow estimates over the life of the loan can result.

64


Table of Contents

The following table presents a rollforward of the accretable yield for three-month period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Balance, beginning of period

$ 23,251 $

Impact of acquisition/purchase on March 30, 2012

27,586

Accretion

(3,319 )

Reclassification from nonaccretable difference

15,228

Balance, end of period

$ 35,160 $ 27,586

At March 31, 2013, there was no allowance for loan losses recorded on the purchased impaired loan portfolio. The following table reflects the outstanding balance of all contractually required payments and carrying amounts of the acquired loans at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Ending
Balance
Unpaid
Balance
Ending
Balance
Unpaid
Balance

Commercial and industrial

$ 53,328 $ 78,632 $ 54,472 $ 80,294

Commercial real estate

118,133 217,938 126,923 226,093

Residential mortgage

2,348 4,013 2,243 4,104

Other consumer

157 238 140 245

Total

$ 173,966 $ 300,821 $ 183,778 $ 310,736

Loan and Lease Purchases and Sales

The following table summarizes significant portfolio loan and lease purchase and sale activity for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Commercial Commercial Home Residential Other

(dollar amounts in thousands)

and Industrial Real Estate Automobile Equity Mortgage Consumer Total

Portfolio loans and leases purchased during the:

Three-month period ended March 31, 2013

$ 21,541 $ $ $ $ $ $ 21,541

Three-month period ended March 31, 2012

$ 477,501 $ 378,122 $ $ 13,025 $ 62,324 $ 85 $ 931,057

Portfolio loans and leases sold or transferred to loans held for sale during the:

Three-month period ended March 31, 2013

$ 27,602 $ 3,903 $ $ $ 4,391 $ $ 35,896

Three-month period ended March 31, 2012

$ 53,447 $ 21,469 $ 1,300,000 $ $ $ $ 1,374,916

NALs and Past Due Loans

Loans are considered past due when the contractual amounts due with respect to principal and interest are not received within 30 days of the contractual due date.

65


Table of Contents

Any loan in any portfolio may be placed on nonaccrual status prior to the policies described below when collection of principal or interest is in doubt. When a borrower with debt is discharged in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy and not reaffirmed by the borrower, the loan is determined to be collateral dependent and placed on nonaccrual status.

All classes within the C&I and CRE portfolios (except for purchased credit-impaired loans) are placed on nonaccrual status at 90-days past due. Residential mortgage loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 150-days past due, with the exception of residential mortgages guaranteed by government organizations which continue to accrue interest at the rate guaranteed by the government agency. First-lien home equity loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 150-days past due. Junior-lien home equity loans are placed on nonaccrual status at the earlier of 120-days past due or when the related first-lien loan has been identified as nonaccrual. Automobile and other consumer loans are generally charged-off when the loan is 120-days past due.

For all classes within all loan portfolios, when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, any accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals charged to interest income, and prior year amounts charged-off as a credit loss.

For all classes within all loan portfolios, cash receipts received on NALs are applied entirely against principal until the loan or lease has been collected in full, after which time any additional cash receipts are recognized as interest income. However, for secured non-reaffirmed debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, payments are applied to principal and interest when the borrower has demonstrated a capacity to continue payment of the debt and collection of the debt is reasonably assured. For unsecured non-reaffirmed debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy where the carrying value has been fully charged-off, payments are recorded as loan recoveries.

Regarding all classes within the C&I and CRE portfolios, the determination of a borrower’s ability to make the required principal and interest payments is based on an examination of the borrower’s current financial statements, industry, management capabilities, and other qualitative measures. For all classes within the consumer loan portfolio, the determination of a borrower’s ability to make the required principal and interest payments is based on multiple factors, including number of days past due and, in some instances, an evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition. When, in Management’s judgment, the borrower’s ability to make required principal and interest payments resumes and collectability is no longer in doubt, the loan or lease is returned to accrual status. For these loans that have been returned to accrual status, cash receipts are applied according to the contractual terms of the loan.

The following table presents NALs by loan class at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

March 31, December 31,

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 52,730 $ 53,009

Other commercial and industrial

28,198 37,696

Total commercial and industrial

$ 80,928 $ 90,705

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 39,587 $ 31,791

Multi family

17,077 19,765

Office

26,632 30,341

Industrial and warehouse

3,398 6,841

Other commercial real estate

24,109 38,390

Total commercial real estate

$ 110,803 $ 127,128

Automobile

$ 6,770 $ 7,823

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 31,119 $ 27,091

Secured by junior-lien

32,286 32,434

Total home equity

$ 63,405 $ 59,525

Residential mortgage

$ 118,405 $ 122,452

Other consumer

$ $

Total nonaccrual loans

$ 380,311 $ 407,633

66


Table of Contents

The following table presents an aging analysis of loans and leases, including past due loans, by loan class at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012: (1)

March 31, 2013
90 or more
Past Due Total Loans days past due
(dollar amounts in thousands) 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 or more days Total Current and Leases and accruing

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 10,278 $ 4,681 $ 35,348 $ 50,307 $ 4,348,198 $ 4,398,505 $

Purchased credit-impaired

2,022 1,264 26,547 29,833 23,495 53,328 26,547

Other commercial and industrial

19,123 3,468 15,545 38,136 12,776,642 12,814,778

Total commercial and industrial

$ 31,423 $ 9,413 $ 77,440 $ 118,276 $ 17,148,335 $ 17,266,611 $ 26,547 (2)

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 3,919 $ $ 8,390 $ 12,309 $ 1,272,278 $ 1,284,587 $

Multi family

4,777 1,272 11,204 17,253 925,197 942,450

Office

4,773 73 12,722 17,568 913,422 930,990

Industrial and warehouse

2,933 1,909 4,842 555,747 560,589

Purchased credit-impaired

2,538 1,812 56,007 60,357 57,776 118,133 56,007

Other commercial real estate

4,064 415 14,500 18,979 1,203,148 1,222,127

Total commercial real estate

$ 23,004 $ 3,572 $ 104,732 $ 131,308 $ 4,927,568 $ 5,058,876 $ 56,007 (2)

Automobile

$ 22,610 4,927 $ 3,534 $ 31,071 $ 5,004,926 $ 5,035,997 $ 3,531

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 20,634 $ 9,592 $ 33,713 $ 63,939 $ 4,581,046 $ 4,644,985 $ 7,602

Secured by junior-lien

36,537 9,509 29,307 75,353 3,753,316 3,828,669 7,442

Total home equity

$ 57,171 $ 19,101 $ 63,020 $ 139,292 $ 8,334,362 $ 8,473,654 $ 15,044

Residential mortgage:

Residential mortgage

$ 114,753 $ 40,632 $ 172,524 $ 327,909 $ 4,720,627 $ 5,048,536 $ 94,360 (3)

Purchased credit-impaired

423 423 1,925 2,348 423

Total residential mortgage

$ 114,753 $ 40,632 $ 172,947 $ 328,332 $ 4,722,552 $ 5,050,884 $ 94,783

Other consumer:

Other consumer

$ 4,407 $ 1,639 $ 1,107 $ 7,153 $ 390,192 $ 397,345 $ 1,107

Purchased credit-impaired

157 157

Total other consumer

$ 4,407 $ 1,639 $ 1,107 $ 7,153 $ 390,349 $ 397,502 $ 1,107

Total loans and leases

$ 253,368 $ 79,284 $ 422,780 $ 755,432 $ 40,528,092 $ 41,283,524 $ 197,019

67


Table of Contents
December 31, 2012
90 or more
Past Due Total Loans days past due
(dollar amounts in thousands) 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 or more days Total Current and Leases and accruing

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 11,409 $ 6,302 $ 31,997 $ 49,708 $ 4,236,211 $ 4,285,919 $

Purchased credit-impaired

986 3,533 26,648 31,167 23,305 54,472 26,648

Other commercial and industrial

20,273 4,211 14,786 39,270 12,591,028 12,630,298

Total commercial and industrial

$ 32,668 $ 14,046 $ 73,431 $ 120,145 $ 16,850,544 $ 16,970,689 $ 26,648

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 3,459 $ 4,203 $ 9,677 $ 17,339 $ 1,413,520 $ 1,430,859 $

Multi family

7,961 1,314 12,062 21,337 963,063 984,400

Office

1,054 2,415 23,335 26,804 909,310 936,114

Industrial and warehouse

6,597 118 5,433 12,148 584,754 596,902

Purchased credit-impaired

556 1,751 56,660 58,967 67,956 126,923 56,660

Other commercial real estate

2,725 2,192 25,463 30,380 1,293,662 1,324,042

Total commercial real estate

$ 22,352 $ 11,993 $ 132,630 $ 166,975 $ 5,232,265 $ 5,399,240 $ 56,660

Automobile

$ 36,267 $ 7,803 $ 4,438 $ 48,508 $ 4,585,312 $ 4,633,820 $ 4,418

Home equity

Secured by first-lien

$ 26,288 $ 9,992 $ 28,322 $ 64,602 $ 4,315,985 $ 4,380,587 $ 5,202

Secured by junior-lien

34,365 16,553 35,150 86,068 3,868,687 3,954,755 12,998

Total home equity

$ 60,653 $ 26,545 $ 63,472 $ 150,670 $ 8,184,672 $ 8,335,342 $ 18,200

Residential mortgage

Residential mortgage

$ 118,582 $ 44,747 $ 164,035 $ 327,364 $ 4,640,065 $ 4,967,429 $ 92,925 (4)

Purchased credit-impaired

58 609 667 1,576 2,243 609

Total residential mortgage

$ 118,640 $ 44,747 $ 164,644 $ 328,031 $ 4,641,641 $ 4,969,672 $ 93,534

Other consumer

Other consumer

$ 7,431 $ 2,117 $ 1,672 $ 11,220 $ 408,302 $ 419,522 $ 1,672

Purchased credit-impaired

76 76 64 140

Total other consumer

$ 7,431 $ 2,193 $ 1,672 $ 11,296 $ 408,366 $ 419,662 $ 1,672

Total loans and leases

$ 278,011 $ 107,327 $ 440,287 $ 825,625 $ 39,902,800 $ 40,728,425 $ 201,132

(1) NALs are included in this aging analysis based on the loan’s past due status.
(2) All amounts represent accruing purchased impaired loans related to the FDIC-assisted Fidelity Bank acquisition. Under the applicable accounting guidance (ASC 310-30), the loans were recorded at fair value upon acquisition and remain in accruing status.
(3) Includes $88,596 thousand guaranteed by the U.S. government.
(4) Includes $90,816 thousand guaranteed by the U.S. government.

68


Table of Contents

Allowance for Credit Losses

Huntington maintains two reserves, both of which reflect Management’s judgment regarding the appropriate level necessary to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio: the ALLL and the AULC. Combined, these reserves comprise the total ACL. The determination of the ACL requires significant estimates, including the timing and amounts of expected future cash flows on impaired loans and leases, consideration of current economic conditions, and historical loss experience pertaining to pools of homogeneous loans and leases, all of which may be susceptible to change.

The appropriateness of the ACL is based on Management’s current judgments about the credit quality of the loan portfolio. These judgments consider on-going evaluations of the loan and lease portfolio, including such factors as the differing economic risks associated with each loan category, the financial condition of specific borrowers, the level of delinquent loans, the value of any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or other documented support. Further, Management evaluates the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on the ability of borrowers to meet their financial obligations when quantifying our exposure to credit losses and assessing the appropriateness of our ACL at each reporting date. In addition to general economic conditions and the other factors described above, additional factors also considered include: the impact of declining residential real estate values; the diversification of CRE loans; the development of new or expanded Commercial business segments such as healthcare, ABL, and energy, and the overall condition of the manufacturing industry. Also, the ACL assessment includes the on-going assessment of credit quality metrics, and a comparison of certain ACL benchmarks to current performance. Management’s determinations regarding the appropriateness of the ACL are reviewed and approved by the Company’s board of directors.

The ALLL consists of two components: (1) the transaction reserve, which includes a loan level allocation per ASC 310-10, specific reserves related to loans considered to be impaired, and loans involved in troubled debt restructurings allocated per ASC 310-40, and (2) the general reserve. The transaction reserve component includes both (1) an estimate of loss based on pools of commercial and consumer loans and leases with similar characteristics and (2) an estimate of loss based on an impairment review of each impaired C&I and CRE loan greater than $1.0 million. For the C&I and CRE portfolios, the estimate of loss based on pools of loans and leases with similar characteristics is made by applying a PD factor and a LGD factor to each individual loan based on a continuously updated loan grade, using a standardized loan grading system. The PD factor and an LGD factor are determined for each loan grade using statistical models based on historical performance data. The PD factor considers on-going reviews of the financial performance of the specific borrower, including cash flow, debt-service coverage ratio, earnings power, debt level, and equity position, in conjunction with an assessment of the borrower’s industry and future prospects. The LGD factor considers analysis of the type of collateral and the relative LTV ratio. These reserve factors are developed based on credit migration models that track historical movements of loans between loan ratings over time and a combination of long-term average loss experience of our own portfolio and external industry data using a 24-month emergence period.

In the case of more homogeneous portfolios, such as automobile loans, home equity loans, and residential mortgage loans, the determination of the transaction reserve also incorporates PD and LGD factors. The estimate of loss is based on pools of loans and leases with similar characteristics. The PD factor considers current credit scores unless the account is delinquent, in which case a higher PD factor is used. The credit score provides a basis for understanding the borrowers past and current payment performance, and this information is used to estimate expected losses over the 12-month emergence period. The performance of first-lien loans ahead of our junior-lien loans is available to use as part of our updated score process. The LGD factor considers analysis of the type of collateral and the relative LTV ratio. Credit scores, models, analyses, and other factors used to determine both the PD and LGD factors are updated frequently to capture the recent behavioral characteristics of the subject portfolios, as well as any changes in loss mitigation or credit origination strategies, and adjustments to the reserve factors are made as required. Models utilized in the ALLL estimation process are subject to the Company’s model validation policies.

The general reserve consists of the economic reserve and risk-profile reserve components. The economic reserve component considers the potential impact of changing market and economic conditions on portfolio performance. The risk-profile component considers items unique to our structure, policies, processes, and portfolio composition, as well as qualitative measurements and assessments of the loan portfolios including, but not limited to, management quality, concentrations, portfolio composition, industry comparisons, and internal review functions.

The estimate for the AULC is determined using the same procedures and methodologies as used for the ALLL. The loss factors used in the AULC are the same as the loss factors used in the ALLL while also considering a historical utilization of unused commitments. The AULC is reflected in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The ACL is increased through a provision for credit losses that is charged to earnings, based on Management’s quarterly evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, and is reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries, and the ACL associated with securitized or sold loans. There were no material changes in assumptions or estimation techniques compared with prior periods that impacted the determination of the current period’s ALLL and AULC.

69


Table of Contents

The following table presents ALLL and AULC activity by portfolio segment for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Commercial Commercial Home Residential Other
(dollar amounts in thousands) and Industrial Real Estate Automobile Equity Mortgage Consumer Total

Three-month period ended March 31, 2013:

ALLL balance, beginning of period

$ 241,051 $ 285,369 $ 34,979 $ 118,764 $ 61,658 $ 27,254 $ 769,075

Loan charge-offs

(13,013 ) (22,368 ) (5,688 ) (26,531 ) (7,901 ) (8,641 ) (84,142 )

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off

9,696 9,590 3,094 6,549 1,753 1,773 32,455

Provision for loan and lease losses

364 (5,155 ) 3,588 17,076 7,559 5,956 29,388

Allowance for loans sold or transferred to loans held for sale

(7 ) (7 )

ALLL balance, end of period

$ 238,098 $ 267,436 $ 35,973 $ 115,858 $ 63,062 $ 26,342 $ 746,769

AULC balance, beginning of period

$ 33,868 $ 4,740 $ $ 1,356 $ 3 $ 684 $ 40,651

Provision for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

(33 ) (336 ) 556 3 14 204

AULC balance, end of period

$ 33,835 $ 4,404 $ $ 1,912 $ 6 $ 698 $ 40,855

ACL balance, end of period

$ 271,933 $ 271,840 $ 35,973 $ 117,770 $ 63,068 $ 27,040 $ 787,624

Commercial Commercial Home Residential Other
(dollar amounts in thousands) and Industrial Real Estate Automobile Equity Mortgage Consumer Total

Three-month period ended March 31, 2012:

ALLL balance, beginning of period

$ 275,367 $ 388,706 $ 38,282 $ 143,873 $ 87,194 $ 31,406 $ 964,828

Loan charge-offs

(33,506 ) (21,402 ) (7,610 ) (25,265 ) (11,745 ) (8,432 ) (107,960 )

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off

5,011 10,896 4,532 1,536 1,175 1,818 24,968

Provision for loan and lease losses

(846 ) (38,706 ) 2,043 48,754 12,505 8,178 31,928

Allowance for loans sold or transferred to loans held for sale

(695 ) (695 )

ALLL balance, end of period

$ 246,026 $ 339,494 $ 36,552 $ 168,898 $ 89,129 $ 32,970 $ 913,069

AULC balance, beginning of period

$ 39,658 $ 5,852 $ $ 2,134 $ 1 $ 811 $ 48,456

Provision for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

2,618 (72 ) (26 ) (42 ) 2,478

AULC balance, end of period

$ 42,276 $ 5,780 $ $ 2,108 $ 1 $ 769 $ 50,934

ACL balance, end of period

$ 288,302 $ 345,274 $ 36,552 $ 171,006 $ 89,130 $ 33,739 $ 964,003

Any loan in any portfolio may be charged-off prior to the policies described below if a loss confirming event has occurred. Loss confirming events include, but are not limited to, bankruptcy (unsecured), continued delinquency, foreclosure, or receipt of an asset valuation indicating a collateral deficiency and that asset is the sole source of repayment. Additionally, discharged, collateral dependent non-reaffirmed debt in Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings will result in a charge-off to estimated collateral value, less anticipated selling costs.

70


Table of Contents

C&I and CRE loans are either charged-off or written down to net realizable value at 90-days past due. Automobile loans and other consumer loans are charged-off at 120-days past due. First-lien and junior-lien home equity loans are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, at 150-days past due and 120-days past due, respectively. Residential mortgages are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, at 150-days past due.

Credit Quality Indicators

To facilitate the monitoring of credit quality for C&I and CRE loans, and for purposes of determining an appropriate ACL level for these loans, Huntington utilizes the following categories of credit grades:

Pass = Higher quality loans that do not fit any of the other categories described below.

OLEM = The credit risk may be relatively minor yet represent a risk given certain specific circumstances. If the potential weaknesses are not monitored or mitigated, the loan may weaken or inadequately protect Huntington’s position in the future. For these reasons, Huntington considers the loans to be potential problem loans.

Substandard = Inadequately protected loans by the borrower’s ability to repay, equity, and/or the collateral pledged to secure the loan. These loans have identified weaknesses that could hinder normal repayment or collection of the debt. It is likely Huntington will sustain some loss if any identified weaknesses are not mitigated.

Doubtful = Loans that have all of the weaknesses inherent in those loans classified as Substandard, with the added elements of the full collection of the loan is improbable and that the possibility of loss is high.

The categories above, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions, are assigned upon initial approval of the loan or lease and subsequently updated as appropriate.

Commercial loans categorized as OLEM, Substandard, or Doubtful are considered Criticized loans. Commercial loans categorized as Substandard or Doubtful are also considered Classified loans.

For all classes within all consumer loan portfolios, each loan is assigned a specific PD factor that is partially based on the borrower’s most recent credit bureau score (FICO), which we update quarterly. A FICO credit bureau score is a credit score developed by Fair Isaac Corporation based on data provided by the credit bureaus. The FICO credit bureau score is widely accepted as the standard measure of consumer credit risk used by lenders, regulators, rating agencies, and consumers. The higher the FICO credit bureau score, the higher likelihood of repayment and therefore, an indicator of higher credit quality.

Huntington assesses the risk in the loan portfolio by utilizing numerous risk characteristics. The classifications described above, and also presented in the table below, represent one of those characteristics that are closely monitored in the overall credit risk management processes. The table below shows an increase in FICO scores less than 650 for the automobile portfolio, and to a lesser degree, the home equity and residential mortgage portfolios. These increases do not reflect a deterioration in asset quality for the portfolios, as other risk characteristics mitigate any increased level of risk associated with the FICO score distribution.

71


Table of Contents

The following table presents each loan and lease class by credit quality indicator at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

March 31, 2013
Credit Risk Profile by UCS classification

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pass OLEM Substandard Doubtful Total

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 4,039,666 $ 163,029 $ 194,963 $ 847 $ 4,398,505

Purchased credit-impaired

4,143 4,241 44,944 53,328

Other commercial and industrial

12,341,169 103,482 369,186 941 12,814,778

Total commercial and industrial

$ 16,384,978 $ 270,752 $ 609,093 $ 1,788 $ 17,266,611

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 1,108,198 $ 53,496 $ 122,893 $ $ 1,284,587

Multi family

862,711 28,545 51,080 114 942,450

Office

825,373 25,013 80,604 930,990

Industrial and warehouse

512,156 9,570 38,863 560,589

Purchased credit-impaired

15,486 14,223 88,227 197 118,133

Other commercial real estate

1,092,942 42,046 87,139 1,222,127

Total commercial real estate

$ 4,416,866 $ 172,893 $ 468,806 $ 311 $ 5,058,876
Credit Risk Profile by FICO score (1)
750+ 650-749 <650 Other (2) Total

Automobile

$ 2,367,944 $ 2,059,788 $ 772,540 $ 135,725 $ 5,335,997 (3)

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 2,841,421 $ 1,394,209 $ 358,284 $ 51,071 $ 4,644,985

Secured by junior-lien

1,921,096 1,353,986 498,480 55,107 3,828,669

Total home equity

$ 4,762,517 $ 2,748,195 $ 856,764 $ 106,178 $ 8,473,654

Residential mortgage:

Residential mortgage

$ 2,557,420 $ 1,687,397 $ 712,712 $ 91,007 $ 5,048,536

Purchased credit-impaired

616 640 1,092 2,348

Total residential mortgage

$ 2,558,036 $ 1,688,037 $ 713,804 $ 91,007 $ 5,050,884

Other consumer:

Other consumer

$ 155,349 $ 156,683 $ 56,805 $ 28,508 $ 397,345

Purchased credit-impaired

157 157

Total other consumer

$ 155,349 $ 156,683 $ 56,962 $ 28,508 $ 397,502
December 31, 2012
Credit Risk Profile by UCS classification

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pass OLEM Substandard Doubtful Total

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 3,970,597 $ 108,731 $ 205,822 $ 769 $ 4,285,919

Purchased credit-impaired

1,663 6,555 46,254 54,472

Other commercial and industrial

12,146,017 145,111 337,805 1,365 12,630,298

Total commercial and industrial

$ 16,118,277 $ 260,397 $ 589,881 $ 2,134 $ 16,970,689

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 1,184,987 $ 63,976 $ 181,896 $ $ 1,430,859

Multi family

902,616 24,098 57,548 138 984,400

Office

826,533 26,488 83,093 936,114

Industrial and warehouse

540,484 15,132 41,286 596,902

Purchased credit-impaired

10,052 18,085 98,786 126,923

Other commercial real estate

1,177,213 43,454 103,262 113 1,324,042

Total commercial real estate

$ 4,641,885 $ 191,233 $ 565,871 $ 251 $ 5,399,240

72


Table of Contents
Credit Risk Profile by FICO score (1)
750+ 650-749 <650 Other (2) Total

Automobile

$ 2,233,439 $ 1,900,824 $ 682,518 $ 117,039 $ 4,933,820 (3)

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 2,618,888 $ 1,345,621 $ 357,019 $ 59,059 $ 4,380,587

Secured by junior-lien

2,046,143 1,375,636 491,226 41,750 3,954,755

Total home equity

$ 4,665,031 $ 2,721,257 $ 848,245 $ 100,809 $ 8,335,342

Residential mortgage

Residential mortgage

$ 2,561,210 $ 1,673,485 $ 711,750 $ 20,984 $ 4,967,429

Purchased credit-impaired

373 1,303 567 2,243

Total residential mortgage

$ 2,561,583 $ 1,674,788 $ 712,317 $ 20,984 $ 4,969,672

Other consumer

Other consumer

$ 169,792 $ 167,389 $ 59,815 $ 22,526 $ 419,522

Purchased credit-impaired

93 47 140

Total other consumer

$ 169,792 $ 167,482 $ 59,862 $ 22,526 $ 419,662

(1) Reflects currently updated customer credit scores.
(2) Reflects deferred fees and costs, loans in process, loans to legal entities, etc.
(3) Includes $0.3 billion of loans reflected as loans held for sale related to an automobile securitization expected to be completed in 2013.

73


Table of Contents

Impaired Loans

For all classes within the C&I and CRE portfolios, all loans with an outstanding balance of $1.0 million or greater are evaluated on a quarterly basis for impairment. Generally, consumer loans within any class are not individually evaluated on a regular basis for impairment. All TDRs, regardless of the outstanding balance amount, are also considered to be impaired. Loans acquired with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination for which it is probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments will not be collected are also considered to be impaired.

Once a loan has been identified for an assessment of impairment, the loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. This determination requires significant judgment and use of estimates, and the eventual outcome may differ significantly from those estimates.

When a loan in any class has been determined to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is measured using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, the observable market price of the loan, or the fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. When the present value of expected future cash flows is used, the effective interest rate is the original contractual interest rate of the loan adjusted for any premium or discount. When the contractual interest rate is variable, the effective interest rate of the loan changes over time. A specific reserve is established as a component of the ALLL when a loan has been determined to be impaired. Subsequent to the initial measurement of impairment, if there is a significant change to the impaired loan’s expected future cash flows, or if actual cash flows are significantly different from the cash flows previously estimated, Huntington recalculates the impairment and appropriately adjusts the specific reserve. Similarly, if Huntington measures impairment based on the observable market price of an impaired loan or the fair value of the collateral of an impaired collateral dependent loan, Huntington will adjust the specific reserve.

When a loan within any class is impaired, the accrual of interest income is discontinued unless the receipt of principal and interest is no longer in doubt. Interest income on TDRs is accrued when all principal and interest is expected to be collected under the post-modification terms. Cash receipts received on nonaccruing impaired loans within any class are generally applied entirely against principal until the loan has been collected in full, after which time any additional cash receipts are recognized as interest income. Cash receipts received on accruing impaired loans within any class are applied in the same manner as accruing loans that are not considered impaired.

74


Table of Contents

The following tables present the balance of the ALLL attributable to loans by portfolio segment individually and collectively evaluated for impairment and the related loan and lease balance at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Commercial
and
Commercial Residential Other
(dollar amounts in thousands) Industrial Real Estate Automobile Home Equity Mortgage Consumer Total

ALLL at March 31, 2013:

Portion of ALLL balance:

Attributable to purchased credit-impaired loans

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Attributable to loans individually evaluated for impairment

15,438 26,228 1,072 6,488 14,666 160 64,052

Attributable to loans collectively evaluated for impairment

222,660 241,208 34,901 109,370 48,396 26,182 682,717

Total ALLL balance

$ 238,098 $ 267,436 $ 35,973 $ 115,858 $ 63,062 $ 26,342 $ 746,769

Loan and Lease Ending Balances at March 31, 2013:

Portion of loan and lease ending balance:

Attributable to purchased credit-impaired loans

$ 53,328 $ 118,133 $ $ $ 2,348 $ 157 $ 173,966

Individually evaluated for impairment

126,201 274,929 41,149 173,323 372,357 2,514 990,473

Collectively evaluated for impairment

17,087,082 4,665,814 4,994,848 8,300,331 4,676,179 394,831 40,119,085

Total loans and leases evaluated for impairment

$ 17,266,611 $ 5,058,876 $ 5,035,997 $ 8,473,654 $ 5,050,884 $ 397,502 $ 41,283,524

75


Table of Contents
(dollar amounts in thousands) Commercial
and Industrial
Commercial
Real Estate
Automobile Home Equity Residential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Total

ALLL at December 31, 2012

Portion of ALLL balance:

Attributable to purchased credit-impaired loans

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Attributable to loans individually evaluated for impairment

11,694 31,133 1,446 4,783 14,176 213 63,445

Attributable to loans collectively evaluated for impairment

229,357 254,236 33,533 113,981 47,482 27,041 705,630

Total ALLL balance:

$ 241,051 $ 285,369 $ 34,979 $ 118,764 $ 61,658 $ 27,254 $ 769,075

Loan and Lease Ending Balances at December 31, 2012

Portion of loan and lease ending balances:

Attributable to purchased credit-impaired loans

$ 54,472 $ 126,923 $ $ $ 2,243 $ 140 $ 183,778

Individually evaluated for impairment

119,535 298,891 43,607 117,532 374,526 2,657 956,748

Collectively evaluated for impairment

16,796,682 4,973,426 4,590,213 8,217,810 4,592,903 416,865 39,587,899

Total loans and leases evaluated for impairment

$ 16,970,689 $ 5,399,240 $ 4,633,820 $ 8,335,342 $ 4,969,672 $ 419,662 $ 40,728,425

76


Table of Contents

The following tables present by class the ending, unpaid principal balance, and the related ALLL, along with the average balance and interest income recognized only for loans and leases individually evaluated for impairment and purchased credit-impaired loans: (1), (2)

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2013 March 31, 2013
Unpaid Interest
Ending Principal Related Average Income

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Balance Balance (5) Allowance Balance Recognized

With no related allowance recorded:

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 4,251 $ 4,292 $ $ 3,741 $ 42

Purchased credit-impaired

53,328 78,632 53,900 1,017

Other commercial and industrial

1,319 2,340 16,310 234

Total commercial and industrial

$ 58,898 $ 85,264 $ $ 73,951 $ 1,293

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 54,681 $ 67,958 $ $ 54,237 $ 704

Multi family

5,590 5,732 5,642 88

Office

14,157 18,926 17,849 220

Industrial and warehouse

13,722 14,844 14,496 197

Purchased credit-impaired

118,133 217,938 122,528 2,254

Other commercial real estate

10,762 11,019 10,277 97

Total commercial real estate

$ 217,045 $ 336,417 $ $ 225,029 $ 3,560

Automobile

$ $ $ $ $

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ $ $ $ $

Secured by junior-lien

Total home equity

$ $ $ $ $

Residential mortgage:

Residential mortgage

$ $ $ $ $

Purchased credit-impaired

2,348 4,013 2,296 45

Total residential mortgage

$ 2,348 $ 4,013 $ $ 2,296 $ 45

Other consumer

Other consumer

$ $ $ $ $

Purchased credit-impaired

157 238 148 3

Total other consumer

$ 157 $ 238 $ $ 148 $ 3

With an allowance recorded:

Commercial and industrial: (3)

Owner occupied

$ 44,037 $ 56,021 $ 5,772 $ 44,251 $ 351

Purchased credit-impaired

Other commercial and industrial

76,594 110,519 9,666 51,313 658

Total commercial and industrial

$ 120,631 $ 166,540 $ 15,438 $ 95,564 $ 1,009

Commercial real estate: (4)

Retail properties

$ 55,656 $ 67,791 $ 5,324 $ 55,818 $ 456

Multi family

16,811 18,269 2,565 17,103 177

Office

45,123 50,196 9,341 41,787 384

Industrial and warehouse

19,991 21,265 939 20,166 186

Purchased credit-impaired

Other commercial real estate

38,436 47,019 8,059 44,980 379

Total commercial real estate

$ 176,017 $ 204,540 $ 26,228 $ 179,854 $ 1,582

Automobile

$ 41,149 $ 42,500 $ 1,072 $ 42,378 $ 437

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 112,731 $ 118,217 $ 2,099 $ 94,494 $ 942

Secured by junior-lien

60,592 82,353 4,389 50,933 592

Total home equity

$ 173,323 $ 200,570 $ 6,488 $ 145,427 $ 1,534

Residential mortgage (6):

Residential mortgage

$ 372,357 $ 412,074 $ 14,666 $ 373,441 $ 2,872

Purchased credit-impaired

Total residential mortgage

$ 372,357 $ 412,074 $ 14,666 $ 373,441 $ 2,872

Other consumer:

Other consumer

$ 2,514 $ 2,532 $ 160 $ 2,585 $ 23

Purchased credit-impaired

Total other consumer

$ 2,514 $ 2,532 $ 160 $ 2,585 $ 23

77


Table of Contents
December 31, 2012
Unpaid

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Ending
Balance
Principal
Balance (5)
Related
Allowance

With no related allowance recorded:

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 1,050 $ 1,091 $

Purchased credit-impaired

54,472 80,294

Other commercial and industrial

31,841 54,520

Total commercial and industrial

$ 87,363 $ 135,905 $

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 54,216 $ 56,569 $

Multi family

5,719 5,862

Office

20,051 24,843

Industrial and warehouse

15,013 17,476

Purchased credit-impaired

126,923 226,093

Other commercial real estate

10,479 10,728

Total commercial real estate

$ 232,401 $ 341,571 $

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ $ $

Secured by junior-lien

Total home equity

$ $ $

Residential mortgage:

Residential mortgage

$ $ $

Purchased credit-impaired

2,243 4,104

Total residential mortgage

$ 2,243 $ 4,104 $

Other consumer

Other consumer

$ $ $

Purchased credit-impaired

140 245

Total other consumer

$ 140 $ 245 $

With an allowance recorded:

Commercial and industrial: (3)

Owner occupied

$ 46,266 $ 56,925 $ 5,730

Purchased credit-impaired

Other commercial and industrial

40,378 52,996 5,964

Total commercial and industrial

$ 86,644 $ 109,921 $ 11,694

Commercial real estate: (4)

Retail properties

$ 65,004 $ 73,000 $ 8,144

Multi family

17,410 18,531 2,662

Office

40,375 45,164 9,214

Industrial and warehouse

22,450 25,374 1,092

Purchased credit-impaired

Other commercial real estate

48,174 63,148 10,021

Total commercial real estate

$ 193,413 $ 225,217 $ 31,133

Automobile

$ 43,607 $ 44,790 $ 1,446

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 76,258 $ 80,831 $ 1,329

Secured by junior-lien

41,274 63,390 3,454

Total home equity

$ 117,532 $ 144,221 $ 4,783

Residential mortgage (6):

Residential mortgage

$ 374,526 $ 413,583 $ 14,176

Purchased credit-impaired

Total residential mortgage

$ 374,526 $ 413,583 $ 14,176

Other consumer:

Other consumer

$ 2,657 $ 2,657 $ 213

Purchased credit-impaired

Total other consumer

$ 2,657 $ 2,657 $ 213

78


Table of Contents
(1) These tables do not include loans fully charged-off.
(2) All automobile, home equity, residential mortgage, and other consumer impaired loans included in these tables are considered impaired due to their status as a TDR.
(3) At March 31, 2013, $43,313 thousand of the $120,631 thousand commercial and industrial loans with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR. At December 31, 2012, $44,265 thousand of the $86,644 thousand commercial and industrial loans with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR.
(4) At March 31, 2013, $30,976 thousand of the $176,017 thousand commercial real estate loans with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR. At December 31, 2012, $31,605 thousand of the $193,413 thousand commercial real estate loans with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR.
(5) The differences between the ending balance and unpaid principal balance amounts represent partial charge-offs.
(6) At March 31, 2013, $28,712 thousand of the $372,357 thousand residential mortgages loans with an allowance recorded were guaranteed by the U.S. government. At December 31, 2012, $28,695 thousand of the $374,526 thousand residential mortgage loans with an allowance recorded were guaranteed by the U.S. government.

TDR Loans

TDRs are modified loans where a concession was provided to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. Loan modifications are considered TDRs when the concessions provided are not available to the borrower through either normal channels or other sources. However, not all loan modifications are TDRs.

TDR Concession Types

The Company’s standards relating to loan modifications consider, among other factors, minimum verified income requirements, cash flow analysis, and collateral valuations. Each potential loan modification is reviewed individually and the terms of the loan are modified to meet a borrower’s specific circumstances at a point in time. All commercial TDRs are reviewed and approved by our SAD. The types of concessions provided to borrowers include:

Interest rate reduction: A reduction of the stated interest rate to a nonmarket rate for the remaining original life of the debt.

Amortization or maturity date change beyond what the collateral supports, including any of the following:

(1) Lengthens the amortization period of the amortized principal beyond market terms. This concession reduces the minimum monthly payment and increases the amount of the balloon payment at the end of the term of the loan. Principal is generally not forgiven.

(2) Reduces the amount of loan principal to be amortized. This concession also reduces the minimum monthly payment and increases the amount of the balloon payment at the end of the term of the loan. Principal is generally not forgiven.

(3) Extends the maturity date or dates of the debt beyond what the collateral supports. This concession generally applies to loans without a balloon payment at the end of the term of the loan.

79


Table of Contents
Chapter 7 bankruptcy: A bankruptcy court’s discharge of a borrower’s debt is considered a concession when the borrower does not reaffirm the discharged debt.

Other: A concession that is not categorized as one of the concessions described above. These concessions include, but are not limited to: principal forgiveness, collateral concessions, covenant concessions, and reduction of accrued interest.

Principal forgiveness may result from any TDR modification of any concession type. However, the aggregate amount of principal forgiven as a result of loans modified as TDRs during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, was not significant.

TDRs by Loan Type

Following is a description of TDRs by the different loan types:

Commercial loan TDRs – Commercial accruing TDRs often result from loans receiving a concession with terms that are not considered a market transaction to Huntington. The TDR remains in accruing status as long as the customer is less than 90-days past due on payments per the restructured loan terms and no loss is expected.

Commercial nonaccrual TDRs result from either: (1) an accruing commercial TDR being placed on nonaccrual status, or (2) a workout where an existing commercial NAL is restructured and a concession was given. At times, these workouts restructure the NAL so that two or more new notes are created. The primary note is underwritten based upon our normal underwriting standards and is sized so projected cash flows are sufficient to repay contractual principal and interest. The terms on the secondary note(s) vary by situation, and may include notes that defer principal and interest payments until after the primary note is repaid. Creating two or more notes often allows the borrower to continue a project or weather a temporary economic downturn and allows Huntington to right-size a loan based upon the current expectations for a borrower’s or project’s performance.

Our strategy involving TDR borrowers includes working with these borrowers to allow them to refinance elsewhere, as well as allow them time to improve their financial position and remain our customer through refinancing their notes according to market terms and conditions in the future. A subsequent refinancing or modification of a loan may occur when either the loan matures according to the terms of the TDR-modified agreement or the borrower requests a change to the loan agreements. At that time, the loan is evaluated to determine if it is creditworthy. It is subjected to the normal underwriting standards and processes for other similar credit extensions, both new and existing. The refinanced note is evaluated to determine if it is considered a new loan or a continuation of the prior loan. A new loan is considered for removal of the TDR designation, whereas a continuation of the prior note requires a continuation of the TDR designation. In order for a TDR designation to be removed, the borrower must no longer be experiencing financial difficulties and the terms of the refinanced loan must not represent a concession.

Residential Mortgage loan TDRs – Residential mortgage TDRs represent loan modifications associated with traditional first-lien mortgage loans in which a concession has been provided to the borrower. The primary concessions given to residential mortgage borrowers are amortization or maturity date changes and interest rate reductions. Residential mortgages identified as TDRs involve borrowers unable to refinance their mortgages through the Company’s normal mortgage origination channels or through other independent sources. Some, but not all, of the loans may be delinquent.

Automobile, Home Equity, and Other Consumer loan TDRs – The Company may make similar interest rate, term, and principal concessions as with residential mortgage loan TDRs.

TDR Impact on Credit Quality

Huntington’s ALLL is largely determined by updated risk ratings assigned to commercial loans, updated borrower credit scores on consumer loans, and borrower delinquency history in both the commercial and consumer portfolios. These updated risk ratings and credit scores consider the default history of the borrower, including payment redefaults. As such, the provision for credit losses is impacted primarily by changes in borrower payment performance rather than the TDR classification. TDRs can be classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loans. Nonaccrual TDRs are included in NALs whereas accruing TDRs are excluded from NALs as it is probable that all contractual principal and interest due under the restructured terms will be collected.

Our TDRs may include multiple concessions and the disclosure classifications are presented based on the primary concession provided to the borrower. The majority of our concessions for the C&I and CRE portfolios are the extension of the maturity date coupled with an increase in the interest rate. In these instances, the primary concession is the maturity date extension.

80


Table of Contents

TDR concessions may also result in the reduction of the ALLL within the C&I and CRE portfolios. This reduction is derived from payments and the resulting application of the reserve calculation within the ALLL. The transaction reserve for non-TDR C&I and CRE loans is calculated based upon several estimated probability factors, such as PD and LGD, both of which were previously discussed. Upon the occurrence of a TDR in our C&I and CRE portfolios, the reserve is measured based on discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs, of the modified loan in accordance with ASC 310-10. The resulting TDR ALLL calculation often results in a lower ALLL amount because (1) the discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs, indicate a lower estimated loss, (2) if the modification includes a rate increase, the discounting of the cash flows on the modified loan, using the pre-modification interest rate, exceeds the carrying value of the loan, or (3) payments may occur as part of the modification. The ALLL for C&I and CRE loans may increase as a result of the modification, as the discounted cash flow analysis may indicate additional reserves are required.

TDR concessions on consumer loans may increase the ALLL. The concessions made to these borrowers often include interest rate reductions, and therefore, the TDR ALLL calculation results in a greater ALLL compared with the non-TDR calculation as the reserve is measured based on the estimation of the discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs, on the modified loan in accordance with ASC 310-10. The resulting TDR ALLL calculation often results in a higher ALLL amount because (1) the discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs, indicate a higher estimated loss or, (2) due to the rate decrease, the discounting of the cash flows on the modified loan, using the pre-modification interest rate, indicates a reduction in the expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs. In certain instances, the ALLL may decrease as a result of payments made in connection with the modification.

Commercial loan TDRs – In instances where the bank substantiates that it will collect its outstanding balance in full, the note is considered for return to accrual status upon the borrower sustaining sufficient cash flows for a six-month period of time. This six-month period could extend before or after the restructure date. If a charge-off was taken as part of the restructuring, any interest or principal payments received on that note are applied to first reduce the bank’s outstanding book balance and then to recoveries of charged-off principal, unpaid interest, and/or fee expenses while the TDR is in nonaccrual status.

Residential Mortgage, Automobile, Home Equity, and Other Consumer loan TDRs – Modified loans identified as TDRs are aggregated into pools for analysis. Cash flows and weighted average interest rates are used to calculate impairment at the pooled-loan level. Once the loans are aggregated into the pool, they continue to be classified as TDRs until contractually repaid or charged-off.

Residential mortgage loans not guaranteed by a U.S. government agency such as the FHA, VA, and the USDA, including TDR loans, are reported as accrual or nonaccrual based upon delinquency status. Nonaccrual TDRs are those that are greater than 150-days contractually past due. Loans guaranteed by U.S. government organizations continue to accrue interest upon delinquency.

81


Table of Contents

The following tables present by class and by the reason for the modification, the number of contracts, post-modification outstanding balance, and the financial effects of the modification for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

New Troubled Debt Restructurings During The Three-Month Period Ended (1)
March 31, 2013 March 31, 2012
(dollar amounts in thousands) Number of
Contracts
Post-
modification
Outstanding
Ending
Balance
Financial effects
of modification (2)
Number of
Contracts
Post-
modification
Outstanding
Ending
Balance
Financial effects
of modification (2)

C&I—Owner occupied:

Interest rate reduction

9 $ 4,668 $ (465 ) 10 $ 3,781 $ 134

Amortization or maturity date change

11 4,853 (25 ) 17 2,722 (47 )

Other

5 1,673 (1 ) 4 1,511 1,379

Total C&I—Owner occupied

25 $ 11,194 $ (491 ) 31 $ 8,014 $ 1,466

C&I—Other commercial and industrial:

Interest rate reduction

5 $ 17,569 $ 1 6 $ 1,316 $ 45

Amortization or maturity date change

35 22,060 2,705 28 4,456 (8 )

Other

7 5,039 211 15 29,502 249

Total C&I—Other commercial and industrial

47 $ 44,668 $ 2,917 49 $ 35,274 $ 286

CRE—Retail properties:

Interest rate reduction

$ $ 4 $ 2,795 $ (2 )

Amortization or maturity date change

4 499 (1 ) 5 1,758 (18 )

Other

2 3,829 (19 )

Total CRE—Retail properties

6 $ 4,328 $ (20 ) 9 $ 4,553 $ (20 )

CRE—Multi family:

Interest rate reduction

3 $ 2,164 $ 11 2 $ 334 $ (5 )

Amortization or maturity date change

2 742 (1 ) 10 1,501 (73 )

Other

1 3,956 (33 ) 4 2,032 (121 )

Total CRE—Multi family

6 $ 6,862 $ (23 ) 16 $ 3,867 $ (199 )

CRE—Office:

Interest rate reduction

$ $ 3 $ 2,116 $ 363

Amortization or maturity date change

5 3,864 12

Other

3 306

Total CRE—Office

5 $ 3,864 $ 12 6 $ 2,422 $ 363

CRE—Industrial and warehouse:

Interest rate reduction

$ $ 1 $ 3,000 $ 4

Amortization or maturity date change

3 641 1 3 1,438 64

Other

1 5,867

Total CRE—Industrial and Warehouse

4 $ 6,508 $ 1 4 $ 4,438 $ 68

CRE—Other commercial real estate:

Interest rate reduction

7 $ 643 $ (1 ) $ $

Amortization or maturity date change

14 46,676 3,760

Other

2 9,435 (2,004 )

Total CRE—Other commercial real estate

7 $ 643 $ (1 ) 16 $ 56,111 $ 1,756

82


Table of Contents

Automobile:

Interest rate reduction

4 $ 42 $ 13 $ 129 $ 2

Amortization or maturity date change

328 1,925 (20 ) 472 3,376 (25 )

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

249 1,639 136

Total Automobile

581 $ 3,606 $ 116 485 $ 3,505 $ (23 )

Residential mortgage:

Interest rate reduction

6 $ 6,417 $ (43 ) 1 $ 33 $

Amortization or maturity date change

54 7,664 25 62 7,053 246

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

44 4,839 133

Other

6 708 16

Total Residential mortgage

110 $ 19,628 $ 131 63 $ 7,086 $ 246

First-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

16 $ 1,662 $ 142 67 $ 7,614 $ 1,299

Amortization or maturity date change

335 34,990 (3,906 ) 15 1,635 (5 )

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

42 2,467 577

Total First-lien home equity

393 $ 39,119 $ (3,187 ) 82 $ 9,249 $ 1,294

Junior-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

5 $ 150 $ 20 22 $ 932 $ 131

Amortization or maturity date change

534 21,924 (2,826 ) 14 608 (16 )

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

125 1,689 1,770

Total Junior-lien home equity

664 $ 23,763 $ (1,036 ) 36 $ 1,540 $ 115

Other consumer:

Interest rate reduction

1 $ 24 $ 1 4 $ 119 $ 9

Amortization or maturity date change

4 63 2 5 60 4

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

14 137 16

Total Other consumer

19 $ 224 $ 19 9 $ 179 $ 13

Total new troubled debt restructurings

1,867 $ 164,407 $ (1,562 ) 806 $ 136,238 $ 5,365

(1) TDRs may include multiple concessions and the disclosure classifications are based on the primary concession provided to the borrower.
(2) Amounts represent the financial impact via provision for loan and lease losses as a result of the modification.

Any loan within any portfolio or class is considered as payment redefaulted at 90-days past due.

83


Table of Contents

The following tables present TDRs that have defaulted within one year of modification during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Troubled Debt Restructurings That Have  Redefaulted (1)
Within One Year Of Modification During The
Three Months Ended March 31,
2013
Three Months Ended March 31,
2012
(dollar amounts in thousands) Number of
Contracts
Ending Balance Number of
Contracts
Ending
Balance

C&I—Owner occupied:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $ 1,011

Amortization or maturity date change

3 479 1 19

Other

3 484

Total C&I—Owner occupied

6 $ 963 2 $ 1,030

C&I—Other commercial and industrial:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

6 42 2 144

Other

2 770

Total C&I—Other commercial and industrial

6 $ 42 4 $ 914

CRE—Retail Properties:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

3 945 1 224

Other

Total CRE—Retail properties

3 $ 945 1 $ 224

CRE—Multi family:

Interest rate reduction

$ 2 $ 1,998

Amortization or maturity date change

Other

Total CRE—Multi family

$ 2 $ 1,998

CRE—Office:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

Other

Total CRE—Office

$ $

CRE—Industrial and Warehouse:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

Other

Total CRE—Industrial and Warehouse

$ $

CRE—Other commercial real estate:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

3 572

Other

Total CRE—Other commercial real estate

$ 3 $ 572

Automobile:

Interest rate reduction

$ 2 $

Amortization or maturity date change

13 97 60

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

67 315

Other

Total Automobile

80 $ 412 62 $

84


Table of Contents

Residential mortgage:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

22 2,758 20 2,703

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

17 1,864

Other

1 101

Total Residential mortgage

40 $ 4,723 20 $ 2,703

First-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

$ 8 $ 767

Amortization or maturity date change

1 14

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

4 731

Other

Total First-lien home equity

4 $ 731 9 $ 781

Junior-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $ 14

Amortization or maturity date change

1 15

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

14 409

Other

Total Junior-lien home equity

14 $ 409 2 $ 29

Other consumer:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $

Amortization or maturity date change

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

1 2

Other

Total Other consumer

1 $ 2 1 $

Total troubled debt restructurings with subsequent redefault

154 $ 8,227 106 $ 8,251

(1) Subsequent redefault is defined as a payment redefault within 12 months of the restructuring date. Payment redefault is defined as 90-days past due for any loan within any portfolio or class. Any loan may be considered to be in payment redefault prior to the guidelines noted above when collection of principal or interest is in doubt.

Pledged Loans and Leases

At March 31, 2013, the Bank has access to the Federal Reserve’s discount window and advances from the FHLB – Cincinnati. As of March 31, 2013, these borrowings and advances are secured by $19.0 billion of loans and securities.

85


Table of Contents

4. AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND OTHER SECURITIES

Listed below are the contractual maturities (under 1 year, 1-5 years, 6-10 years, and over 10 years) of available-for-sale and other securities at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Fair Value Amortized
Cost
Fair Value

U.S. Treasury:

Under 1 year

$ $ $ $

1-5 years

50,947 51,526 51,111 51,770

6-10 years

508 537 508 539

Over 10 years

1 3 1 2

Total U.S. Treasury

51,456 52,066 51,620 52,311

Federal agencies: mortgage-backed securities:

Under 1 year

1 1

1-5 years

170,623 173,392 182,722 185,792

6-10 years

504,508 519,486 503,045 521,068

Over 10 years

3,400,142 3,484,055 3,464,196 3,557,809

Total Federal agencies: mortgage-backed securities

4,075,273 4,176,933 4,149,964 4,264,670

Other agencies:

Under 1 year

5,483 5,562 4,934 5,017

1-5 years

306,501 315,210 304,769 314,149

6-10 years

32,758 33,719 39,143 40,460

Over 10 years

Total other agencies

344,742 354,491 348,846 359,626

Total U.S. Government backed agencies

4,471,471 4,583,490 4,550,430 4,676,607

Municipal securities:

Under 1 year

125 126 466 466

1-5 years

180,238 185,309 173,300 177,593

6-10 years

348,124 353,519 257,314 265,490

Over 10 years

52,643 52,111 58,000 57,451

Total municipal securities

581,130 591,065 489,080 501,000

Private-label CMO:

Under 1 year

1-5 years

6-10 years

6,043 6,245 7,394 7,567

Over 10 years

64,033 60,735 68,163 64,001

Total private-label CMO

70,076 66,980 75,557 71,568

Asset-backed securities:

Under 1 year

26,000 26,180 26,000 26,258

1-5 years

497,044 504,242 506,319 514,616

6-10 years

264,637 271,501 204,525 210,477

Over 10 years

395,436 296,940 389,471 277,732

Total asset-backed securities

1,183,117 1,098,863 1,126,315 1,029,083

Covered bonds:

Under 1 year

1-5 years

281,711 289,409 282,080 290,625

6-10 years

Over 10 years

Total covered bonds

281,711 289,409 282,080 290,625

Corporate debt:

Under 1 year

26,768 26,951 27,153 27,411

1-5 years

293,788 307,094 458,516 468,077

6-10 years

196,952 197,343 158,878 162,453

Over 10 years

10,138 10,327 10,146 10,201

Total corporate debt

527,646 541,715 654,693 668,142

Other:

Under 1 year

500 500 1,500 1,498

1-5 years

2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400

6-10 years

1,500 1,500

Over 10 years

Non-marketable equity securities

311,738 311,738 308,075 308,075

Marketable equity securities

16,461 16,979 16,877 17,177

Total other

332,599 333,117 328,852 329,150

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$ 7,447,750 $ 7,504,639 $ 7,507,007 $ 7,566,175

86


Table of Contents

Other securities at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 include $165.6 million of stock issued by the FHLB of Cincinnati, $3.5 million of stock issued by the FHLB of Indianapolis, and $142.6 million and $139.0 million, respectively, of Federal Reserve Bank stock. Other securities also include corporate debt and marketable equity securities. Non-marketable equity securities are valued at amortized cost. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Huntington did not have any material equity positions in FNMA or FHLMC.

The following tables provide amortized cost, fair value, and gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income by investment category at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Unrealized

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Gross
Gains
Gross
Losses
Fair
Value

March 31, 2013

U.S. Treasury

$ 51,456 $ 610 $ $ 52,066

Federal agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

4,075,273 103,210 (1,550 ) 4,176,933

Other agencies

344,742 9,751 (2 ) 354,491

Total U.S. Government backed securities

4,471,471 113,571 (1,552 ) 4,583,490

Municipal securities

581,130 12,691 (2,756 ) 591,065

Private-label CMO

70,076 1,081 (4,177 ) 66,980

Asset-backed securities

1,183,117 16,759 (101,013 ) 1,098,863

Covered bonds

281,711 7,698 289,409

Corporate debt

527,646 16,668 (2,599 ) 541,715

Other securities

332,599 533 (15 ) 333,117

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$ 7,447,750 $ 169,001 $ (112,112 ) $ 7,504,639

Unrealized

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Gross
Gains
Gross
Losses
Fair
Value

December 31, 2012

U.S. Treasury

$ 51,620 $ 691 $ $ 52,311

Federal agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

4,149,964 114,984 (278 ) 4,264,670

Other agencies

348,846 10,781 (1 ) 359,626

Total U.S. Government backed securities

4,550,430 126,456 (279 ) 4,676,607

Municipal securities

489,080 13,927 (2,007 ) 501,000

Private-label CMO

75,557 1,087 (5,076 ) 71,568

Asset-backed securities

1,126,315 16,287 (113,519 ) 1,029,083

Covered bonds

282,080 8,545 290,625

Corporate debt

654,693 15,301 (1,852 ) 668,142

Other securities

328,852 333 (35 ) 329,150

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$ 7,507,007 $ 181,936 $ (122,768 ) $ 7,566,175

87


Table of Contents

The following tables provide detail on investment securities with unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Less than 12 Months Over 12 Months Total

(dollar amounts in thousands )

Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses

March 31, 2013

U.S. Treasury

$ $ $ $ $ $

Federal agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

198,901 (1,550 ) 198,901 (1,550 )

Other agencies

1,099 (2 ) 1,099 (2 )

Total U.S. Government backed securities

200,000 (1,552 ) 200,000 (1,552 )

Municipal securities

159,973 (2,756 ) 159,973 (2,756 )

Private-label CMO

21,434 29,855 (4,177 ) 51,289 (4,177 )

Asset-backed securities

48,626 (368 ) 115,455 (100,645 ) 164,081 (101,013 )

Covered bonds

Corporate debt

137,837 (2,289 ) 44,690 (310 ) 182,527 (2,599 )

Other securities

2,573 (15 ) 2,573 (15 )

Total temporarily impaired securities

$ 567,870 $ (6,965 ) $ 192,573 $ (105,147 ) $ 760,443 $ (112,112 )

Less than 12 Months Over 12 Months Total

(dollar amounts in thousands )

Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses

December 31, 2012

U.S. Treasury

$ $ $ $ $ $

Federal agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

44,836 (278 ) 44,836 (278 )

Other agencies

801 (1 ) 801 (1 )

Total U.S. Government backed securities

45,637 (279 ) 45,637 (279 )

Municipal securities

51,316 (2,007 ) 51,316 (2,007 )

Private-label CMO

22,793 34,617 (5,076 ) 57,410 (5,076 )

Asset-backed securities

28,089 (73 ) 108,660 (113,446 ) 136,749 (113,519 )

Covered bonds

Corporate debt

138,792 (1,472 ) 119,620 (380 ) 258,412 (1,852 )

Other securities

1,630 (35 ) 1,630 (35 )

Total temporarily impaired securities

$ 286,627 $ (3,831 ) $ 264,527 $ (118,937 ) $ 551,154 $ (122,768 )

The following table is a summary of realized securities gains and losses for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Gross gains on sales of securities

$ 199 $ 779

Gross (losses) on sales of securities

(12 ) (155 )

Net gain on sales of securities

$ 187 $ 624

Pooled-Trust-Preferred, and Private-Label CMO Securities

The highest risk category of our investment portfolio are the private-label CMO and the pooled-trust-preferred portfolios. Of the $67.0 million of the private-label CMO securities reported at fair value at March 31, 2013, approximately $30.8 million are rated below investment grade. The pooled-trust-preferred securities are in the asset-backed securities portfolio. The performance of the underlying securities in each of these categories continued to reflect the economic environment. Each of these securities in these two categories is subjected to a rigorous review of its projected cash flows. These reviews are supported with analysis from independent third parties.

88


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the relevant characteristics of our pooled-trust-preferred securities portfolio, which are included in asset-backed securities, at March 31, 2013. Each security is part of a pool of issuers and supports a more senior tranche of securities except for the I-Pre TSL II, and MM Comm III securities which are the most senior class.

Trust Preferred Securities Data

March 31, 2013

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Actual
Deferrals Expected
and Defaults
# of Issuers Defaults as a % of
Lowest Currently as a % of Remaining
Amortized Fair Unrealized Credit Performing/ Original Performing Excess

Deal Name

Par Value Cost Value Loss (2) Rating (3) Remaining (4) Collateral Collateral Subordination (5)

Alesco II (1)

$ 41,645 $ 30,238 $ 11,601 $ (18,637 ) C 31/35 8 % 10 % %

Alesco IV (1)

21,630 8,247 4,177 (4,070 ) C 32/39 9 13

ICONS

20,000 20,000 13,948 (6,052 ) BB 23/24 3 13 47

I-Pre TSL II

26,203 26,136 22,137 (3,999 ) A 22/24 5 10 73

MM Comm III

7,220 6,898 4,931 (1,967 ) B 6/10 5 9 22

Pre TSL IX (1)

5,000 3,955 1,757 (2,198 ) C 32/46 20 14 7

Pre TSL X (1)

17,466 9,041 5,158 (3,883 ) C 35/50 26 13

Pre TSL XI (1)

25,225 21,680 7,217 (14,463 ) C 42/62 29 15

Pre TSL XIII (1)

29,070 22,701 8,927 (13,774 ) C 43/63 30 22 3

Reg Diversified (1)

25,500 6,908 462 (6,446 ) D 24/43 40 12

Soloso (1)

12,500 3,546 335 (3,211 ) C 37/64 32 23

Tropic III

31,000 31,000 10,308 (20,692 ) CC 25/42 30 18 31

Total at March 31, 2013

$ 262,459 $ 190,350 $ 90,958 $ (99,392 )

Total at December 31, 2012

$ 266,863 $ 195,760 $ 84,296 $ (111,464 )

(1) Security was determined to have OTTI. As such, the book value is net of recorded credit impairment.
(2) The majority of securities have been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or longer.
(3) For purposes of comparability, the lowest credit rating expressed is equivalent to Fitch ratings even where the lowest rating is based on another nationally recognized credit rating agency.
(4) Includes both banks and/or insurance companies.
(5) Excess subordination percentage represents the additional defaults in excess of both current and projected defaults that the CDO can absorb before the bond experiences credit impairment. Excess subordinated percentage is calculated by (a) determining what percentage of defaults a deal can experience before the bond has credit impairment, and (b) subtracting from this default breakage percentage both total current and expected future default percentages.

Security Impairment

Huntington evaluates its available-for-sale securities portfolio on a quarterly basis for indicators of OTTI. Huntington assesses whether OTTI has occurred when the fair value of a debt security is less than the amortized cost basis at period-end. Management reviews the amount of unrealized loss, the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position, the credit rating history, market trends of similar security classes, time remaining to maturity, and the source of both interest and principal payments to identify securities which could potentially be impaired. OTTI is considered to have occurred; (1) if Huntington intends to sell the security; (2) if it is more likely than not Huntington will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) the present value of the expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover all contractually required principal and interest payments.

For securities that Huntington does not expect to sell and it is not more likely than not to be required to sell, the OTTI is separated into credit and noncredit components. A discounted cash flow analysis, which includes evaluating the timing of the expected cash flows, is completed for all debt securities subject to credit impairment. The measurement of the credit loss component is equal to the difference between the debt security’s cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s original effective yield. The credit-related OTTI, represented by the expected loss in principal, is recognized in noninterest income. The remaining difference between the security’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is due to factors that are not credit-related and, therefore, are recognized in OCI. Huntington believes that it will fully collect the carrying value of securities on which noncredit-related OTTI has been recognized in OCI. Noncredit-related OTTI results from other factors, including increased liquidity spreads and extension of the security. For securities which Huntington does expect to sell, or if it is more likely than not Huntington will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, all OTTI is recognized in earnings. Presentation of OTTI is made in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income on a gross basis with a reduction for the amount of OTTI recognized in OCI. Once an OTTI is recorded, when future cash flows can be reasonably estimated, future cash flows are re-allocated between interest and principal cash flows to provide for a level-yield on the security.

89


Table of Contents

Huntington applied the related OTTI guidance on the debt security types listed below.

Alt-A mortgage-backed and private-label CMO securities are collateralized by first-lien residential mortgage loans. The securities are valued by a third party pricing specialist using a discounted cash flow approach and proprietary pricing model. The model uses inputs such as estimated prepayment speeds, losses, recoveries, default rates that are implied by the underlying performance of collateral in the structure or similar structures, discount rates that are implied by market prices for similar securities, collateral structure types, and house price depreciation / appreciation rates that are based upon macroeconomic forecasts.

Pooled-trust-preferred securities are CDOs backed by a pool of debt securities issued by financial institutions. The collateral generally consists of trust-preferred securities and subordinated debt securities issued by banks, bank holding companies, and insurance companies. A full cash flow analysis is used to estimate fair values and assess impairment for each security within this portfolio. A third party pricing specialist with direct industry experience in pooled-trust-preferred security evaluations is engaged to provide assistance estimating the fair value and expected cash flows on this portfolio. The full cash flow analysis is completed by evaluating the relevant credit and structural aspects of each pooled-trust-preferred security in the portfolio, including collateral performance projections for each piece of collateral in the security and terms of the security’s structure. The credit review includes an analysis of profitability, credit quality, operating efficiency, leverage, and liquidity using available financial and regulatory information for each underlying collateral issuer. The analysis also includes a review of historical industry default data, current/near term operating conditions, and the impact of macroeconomic and regulatory changes. Using the results of our analysis, we estimate appropriate default and recovery probabilities for each piece of collateral then estimate the expected cash flows for each security. The cumulative probability of default ranges from a low of 1% to 100%.

Many collateral issuers have the option of deferring interest payments on their debt for up to five years. For issuers who are deferring interest, assumptions are made regarding the issuers ability to resume interest payments and make the required principal payment at maturity; the cumulative probability of default for these issuers currently ranges from 1% to 100%, and a 10% recovery assumption. The fair value of each security is obtained by discounting the expected cash flows at a market discount rate, ranging from LIBOR plus 4.3% to LIBOR plus 16.3% as of March 31, 2013. The market discount rate is determined by reference to yields observed in the market for similarly rated collateralized debt obligations, specifically high-yield collateralized loan obligations. The relatively high market discount rate is reflective of the uncertainty of the cash flows and illiquid nature of these securities. The large differential between the fair value and amortized cost of some of the securities reflects the high market discount rate and the expectation that the majority of the cash flows will not be received until near the final maturity of the security (the final maturities range from 2032 to 2035).

For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the following table summarizes by security type the total OTTI losses recognized in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for securities evaluated for impairment as described above.

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Available-for-sale and other securities:

Alt-A Mortgage-backed

$ $

Pooled-trust-preferred

(360 )

Private label CMO

(336 ) (1,237 )

Total debt securities

(696 ) (1,237 )

Equity securities

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$ (696 ) $ (1,237 )

90


Table of Contents

The following table rolls forward the OTTI amounts recognized in earnings on debt securities held by Huntington for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 as follows:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Balance, beginning of period

$ 49,433 $ 56,764

Reductions from sales/maturities

(1,097 )

Credit losses not previously recognized

Additional credit losses

696 1,237

Balance, end of period

$ 50,129 $ 56,904

The fair values of these assets have been impacted by various market conditions. The unrealized losses were primarily the result of wider liquidity spreads on asset-backed securities and increased market volatility on non-agency mortgage and asset-backed securities that are collateralized by certain mortgage loans. In addition, the expected average lives of the asset-backed securities backed by trust-preferred securities have been extended, due to changes in the expectations of when the underlying securities would be repaid. The contractual terms and / or cash flows of the investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost. Huntington does not intend to sell, nor does it believe it will be required to sell these securities until the fair value is recovered, which may be maturity and; therefore, does not consider them to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2013.

As of March 31, 2013, Management has evaluated all other investment securities with unrealized losses and all non-marketable securities for impairment and concluded no additional OTTI is required.

5. HELD-TO-MATURITY SECURITIES

These are debt securities that Huntington has the intent and ability to hold until maturity. The debt securities are carried at amortized cost and adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using the interest method.

Listed below are the contractual maturities (under 1 year, 1-5 years, 6-10 years, and over 10 years) of held-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Fair Value Amortized
Cost
Fair Value

Federal agencies: mortgage-backed securities:

Under 1 year

$ $ $ $

1-5 years

6-10 years

24,901 24,460 24,901 24,739

Over 10 years

1,575,139 1,614,685 1,624,483 1,672,702

Total Federal agencies: mortgage-backed securities

1,600,040 1,639,145 1,649,384 1,697,441

Other agencies:

Under 1 year

1-5 years

6-10 years

15,106 15,418 15,108 15,338

Over 10 years

68,118 69,079 69,399 71,341

Total other agencies

83,224 84,497 84,507 86,679

Total U.S. Government backed agencies

1,683,264 1,723,642 1,733,891 1,784,120

Municipal securities:

Under 1 year

1-5 years

6-10 years

Over 10 years

9,810 9,812 9,985 9,985

Total municipal securities

9,810 9,812 9,985 9,985

Total held-to-maturity securities

$ 1,693,074 $ 1,733,454 $ 1,743,876 $ 1,794,105

91


Table of Contents

The following table provides amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value by investment category at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Unrealized
Amortized Gross Gross Fair

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Cost Gains Losses Value

March 31, 2013

Federal Agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

$ 1,600,040 $ 39,574 $ (469 ) $ 1,639,145

Other agencies

83,224 1,273 84,497

Total U.S. Government backed securities

1,683,264 40,847 (469 ) 1,723,642

Municipal securities

9,810 2 9,812

Total held-to-maturity securities

$ 1,693,074 $ 40,849 $ (469 ) $ 1,733,454

Unrealized
Amortized Gross Gross Fair

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Cost Gains Losses Value

December 31, 2012

Federal Agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

$ 1,649,384 $ 48,219 $ (162 ) $ 1,697,441

Other agencies

84,507 2,172 86,679

Total U.S. Government backed securities

1,733,891 50,391 (162 ) 1,784,120

Municipal securities

9,985 9,985

Total held-to-maturity securities

$ 1,743,876 $ 50,391 $ (162 ) $ 1,794,105

Security Impairment

Huntington evaluates the held-to-maturity securities portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment. Impairment would exist when the present value of the expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. Under these circumstances, any impairment would be recognized in earnings. As of March 31, 2013, Management has evaluated held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses for impairment and concluded no OTTI is required.

6. LOAN SALES AND SECURITIZATIONS

Residential Mortgage Loans

The following table summarizes activity relating to residential mortgage loans sold with servicing retained for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Residential mortgage loans sold with servicing retained

$ 836,134 $ 1,006,084

Pretax gains resulting from above loan sales (1)

35,569 28,941

(1) Recorded in mortgage banking income.

A MSR is established only when the servicing is contractually separated from the underlying mortgage loans by sale or securitization of the loans with servicing rights retained. At initial recognition, the MSR asset is established at its fair value using assumptions consistent with assumptions used to estimate the fair value of existing MSRs. At the time of initial capitalization, MSRs are recorded using either the fair value method or the amortization method. The election of the fair value method or amortization method is made at the time each servicing asset is established. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of MSRs carried under the fair value method, as well as amortization or impairment of MSRs recorded using the amortization method, during the period is recorded as an increase or decrease in mortgage banking income, which is reflected in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

92


Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the changes in MSRs recorded using either the fair value method or the amortization method for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended

Fair Value Method:

March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Fair value, beginning of period

$ 35,202 $ 65,001

Change in fair value during the period due to:

Time decay (1)

(609 ) (856 )

Payoffs (2)

(3,157 ) (4,039 )

Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions (3)

4,146 2,348

Fair value, end of period

$ 35,582 $ 62,454

Weighted-average life (years)

3.6 3.2

(1) Represents decrease in value due to passage of time, including the impact from both regularly scheduled loan principal payments and partial loan paydowns.
(2) Represents decrease in value associated with loans that paid off during the period.
(3) Represents change in value resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment spreads.

Three Months Ended

Amortization Method:

March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Carrying value, beginning of year

$ 85,545 $ 72,434

New servicing assets created

9,286 10,287

Impairment recovery / (charge)

13,651 7,558

Amortization and other

(4,137 ) (4,384 )

Carrying value, end of period

$ 104,345 $ 85,895

Fair value, end of period

$ 104,512 $ 86,060

Weighted-average life (years)

4.6 3.7

MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of MSRs occur, the precise terms and conditions are typically not readily available. Therefore, the fair value of MSRs is estimated using a discounted future cash flow model. The model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees and assumptions related to prepayments, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenues, costs to service, and other economic factors. Changes in the assumptions used may have a significant impact on the valuation of MSRs.

MSR values are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans, which can be greatly impacted by the level of prepayments. Huntington hedges the value of certain MSRs against changes in value attributable to changes in interest rates using a combination of derivative instruments and trading securities.

For MSRs under the fair value method, a summary of key assumptions and the sensitivity of the MSR value at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, to changes in these assumptions follows:

March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Decline in fair value due to Decline in fair value due to
10% 20% 10% 20%
adverse adverse adverse adverse

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Actual change change Actual change change

Constant prepayment rate (annualized)

15.60 % $ (2,218 ) $ (4,484 ) 19.52 % $ (2,608 ) $ (5,051 )

Spread over forward interest rate swap rates

1,306 bps (1,426 ) (2,853 ) 1,288 bps (1,290 ) (2,580 )

93


Table of Contents

For MSRs under the amortization method, a summary of key assumptions and the sensitivity of the MSR value at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, to changes in these assumptions follows:

March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Decline in fair value due to Decline in fair value due to
10% 20% 10% 20%
adverse adverse adverse adverse

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Actual change change Actual change change

Constant prepayment rate (annualized)

10.60 % $ (5,017 ) $ (9,705 ) 15.45 % $ (4,936 ) $ (9,451 )

Spread over forward interest rate swap rates

946 bps (4,087 ) (8,173 ) 940 bps (3,060 ) (6,119 )

Total servicing fees included in mortgage banking income amounted to $11.2 million and $11.8 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for third parties was $15.4 billion and $15.6 billion at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Automobile Loans and Leases

Huntington has retained servicing responsibilities on sold automobile loans and receives annual servicing fees and other ancillary fees on the outstanding loan balances. Automobile loan servicing rights are accounted for using the amortization method. A servicing asset is established at fair value at the time of the sale. The servicing asset is then amortized against servicing income. Impairment, if any, is recognized when carrying value exceeds the fair value as determined by calculating the present value of expected net future cash flows. The primary risk characteristic for measuring servicing assets is payoff rates of the underlying loan pools. Valuation calculations rely on the predicted payoff assumption and, if actual payoff is quicker than expected, then future value would be impaired.

Changes in the carrying value of automobile loan servicing rights for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the fair value at the end of each period were as follows:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Carrying value, beginning of period

$ 35,606 $ 13,377

New servicing assets created

19,883

Impairment charge

(217 )

Amortization and other

(4,953 ) (2,480 )

Carrying value, end of period

$ 30,436 $ 30,780

Fair value, end of period

$ 30,823 $ 31,509

Weighted-average life (years)

4.1 4.7

A summary of key assumptions and the sensitivity of the automobile loan servicing rights value to changes in these assumptions at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 follows:

March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Decline in fair value due to Decline in fair value due to
10% 20% 10% 20%
adverse adverse adverse adverse

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Actual change change Actual change change

Constant prepayment rate (annualized)

15.12 % $ (1,023 ) $ (2,048 ) 13.80 % $ (880 ) $ (1,771 )

Spread over forward interest rate swap rates

500 bps (15 ) (30 ) 500 bps (18 ) (36 )

Servicing income, net of amortization of capitalized servicing assets and impairment, amounted to $2.7 million and $1.2 million for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The unpaid principal balance of automobile loans serviced for third parties was $2.3 billion and $2.5 billion at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

94


Table of Contents

7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Business segments are based on segment leadership structure, which reflects how segment performance is monitored and assessed. A rollforward of goodwill by business segment for the first three-month period of 2013 is presented in the table below:

Retail & Regional &
Business Commercial Treasury/ Huntington

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Banking Banking AFCRE WGH Other Consolidated

Balance, beginning of period

$ 286,824 $ 16,169 $ $ 98,951 $ 42,324 $ 444,268

Adjustments

Balance, end of period

$ 286,824 $ 16,169 $ $ 98,951 $ 42,324 $ 444,268

Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis at October 1 of each year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. No events or changes in circumstances since the October 1, 2012, annual impairment test were noted that would indicate it was more likely than not a goodwill impairment existed.

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Huntington’s other intangible assets consisted of the following:

Gross Net
Carrying Accumulated Carrying

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amount Amortization Value

March 31, 2013

Core deposit intangible

$ 380,249 $ (310,407 ) $ 69,842

Customer relationship

106,974 (52,825 ) 54,149

Other

25,164 (24,919 ) 245

Total other intangible assets

$ 512,387 $ (388,151 ) $ 124,236

December 31, 2012

Core deposit intangible

$ 380,249 $ (302,003 ) $ 78,246

Customer relationship

104,574 (50,925 ) 53,649

Other

25,164 (24,902 ) 262

Total other intangible assets

$ 509,987 $ (377,830 ) $ 132,157

The estimated amortization expense of other intangible assets for the remainder of 2013 and the next five years is as follows:

(dollar amounts Amortization

in thousands)

Expense

2013

$ 31,048

2014

36,711

2015

20,549

2016

7,336

2017

6,854

2018

5,983

95


Table of Contents

8. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The components of other comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, were as follows:

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2013
Tax (Expense)

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pretax Benefit After-tax

Noncredit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold

$ 5,894 $ (2,063 ) $ 3,831

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities arising during the period

(8,847 ) 3,062 (5,785 )

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income

454 (159 ) 295

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities

(2,499 ) 840 (1,659 )

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale equity securities

220 (77 ) 143

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships arising during the period

(15,929 ) 5,575 (10,354 )

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) losses included in net income

(4,026 ) 1,410 (2,616 )

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships

(19,955 ) 6,985 (12,970 )

Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost included in net income

8,227 (2,879 ) 5,348

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

$ (14,007 ) $ 4,869 $ (9,138 )

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2012
Tax (Expense)

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pretax Benefit After-tax

Noncredit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold

$ 6,964 (2,437 ) 4,527

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities arising during the period

26,788 (9,563 ) 17,225

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income

613 (215 ) 398

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities

34,365 (12,215 ) 22,150

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale equity securities

343 (120 ) 223

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships arising during the period

(39,669 ) 13,877 (25,792 )

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) losses included in net income

24,793 (8,670 ) 16,123

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships

(14,876 ) 5,207 (9,669 )

Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost included in net income

4,989 (1,746 ) 3,243

Total other comprehensive income

$ 24,821 $ (8,874 ) $ 15,947

96


Table of Contents

Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, were as follows:

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Unrealized
gains and
(losses) on debt
securities (1)
Unrealized
gains and
(losses) on
equity
securities
Unrealized
gains and
(losses) on
cash flow
hedging
derivatives
Unrealized
gains (losses)
for pension
and other post-
retirement
obligations
Total

Balance, December 31, 2011

$ (29,267 ) $ (30 ) $ 40,898 $ (185,364 ) $ (173,763 )

Period change

22,150 223 (9,669 ) 3,243 15,947

Balance, March 31, 2012

$ (7,117 ) $ 193 $ 31,229 $ (182,121 ) $ (157,816 )

Balance, December 31, 2012

$ 38,304 $ 194 $ 47,084 $ (236,399 ) $ (150,817 )

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

(1,954 ) 143 (10,354 ) (12,165 )

Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI

295 (2,616 ) 5,348 3,027

Period change

(1,659 ) 143 (12,970 ) 5,348 (9,138 )

Balance, March 31, 2013

$ 36,645 $ 337 $ 34,114 $ (231,051 ) $ (159,955 )

(1) Amount at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 includes $0.2 million of net unrealized gains on securities transferred from the available-for-sale securities portfolio to the held-to-maturity securities portfolio. The net unrealized gains will be recognized in earnings over the remaining life of the security using the effective interest method.

The following table presents the reclassification adjustments out of accumulated OCI included in net income and the impacted line items as listed on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013:

Reclassifications out of accumulated OCI

Amounts Location of net gain (loss)
reclassified from reclassified from accumulated

Accumulated OCI components

accumulated OCI

OCI into earnings

Three Months
Ended

(dollar amounts in thousands)

March 31, 2013

Gains (losses) on debt securities:

Amortization of unrealized gains (losses)

$ 55 Interest income—held-to-maturity securities—taxable

Realized gain (loss) on sale of securities

187 Noninterest income—net gains (losses) on sale of securities

OTTI recorded

(696 ) Noninterest income—net gains (losses) on sale of securities

(454 ) Total before tax
159 Tax (expense) benefit

$ (295 ) Net of tax

Gains (losses) on cash flow hedging relationships:

Interest rate contracts

$ 3,916 Interest income—loans and leases
110 Noninterest income—other income

4,026 Total before tax
(1,410 ) Tax (expense) benefit

$ 2,616 Net of tax

Amortization of defined benefit pension and post-retirement items:

Actuarial gains (losses)

$ (9,954 ) Noninterest expense—personnel costs

Prior service costs

1,727 Noninterest expense—personnel costs

(8,227 ) Total before tax
2,879 Tax (expense) benefit

$ (5,348 ) Net of tax

97


Table of Contents

9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Share Repurchase Program

On March 14, 2013, Huntington announced that the Federal Reserve did not object to Huntington’s proposed capital actions included in Huntington’s capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve in January of this year. These actions included an increase in the quarterly dividend per common share to $0.05, starting in the second quarter of 2013 and potential repurchase of up to $227 million of common stock through the first quarter of 2014. Huntington’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase program consistent with Huntington’s capital plan. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, Huntington repurchased a total of 4.7 million shares of common stock, at a weighted average share price of $7.07. Huntington did not repurchase any shares during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012.

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is the amount of earnings (adjusted for dividends declared on preferred stock) available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share is the amount of earnings available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period adjusted to include the effect of potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares include incremental shares issued for stock options, restricted stock units and awards, distributions from deferred compensation plans, and the conversion of Huntington’s convertible preferred stock. Potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in periods in which the effect would be antidilutive. For diluted earnings per share, net income available to common shares can be affected by the conversion of Huntington’s convertible preferred stock. Where the effect of this conversion would be dilutive, net income available to common shareholders is adjusted by the associated preferred dividends and deemed dividend. The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, was as follows:

Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) 2013 2012

Basic earnings per common share:

Net income

$ 151,780 $ 153,270

Preferred stock dividends

(7,970 ) (8,049 )

Net income available to common shareholders

$ 143,810 $ 145,221

Average common shares issued and outstanding

841,103 864,499

Basic earnings per common share

$ 0.17 $ 0.17

Diluted earnings per common share

Net income available to common shareholders

$ 143,810 $ 145,221

Effect of assumed preferred stock conversion

Net income applicable to diluted earnings per share

$ 143,810 $ 145,221

Average common shares issued and outstanding

841,103 864,499

Dilutive potential common shares:

Stock options and restricted stock units and awards

6,281 3,463

Shares held in deferred compensation plans

1,324 1,202

Conversion of preferred stock

Dilutive potential common shares:

7,605 4,665

Total diluted average common shares issued and outstanding

848,708 869,164

Diluted earnings per common share

$ 0.17 $ 0.17

For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately 10.6 million and 22.9 million, respectively, of options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would be antidilutive.

11. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Huntington sponsors nonqualified and incentive share based compensation plans. These plans provide for the granting of stock options and other awards to officers, directors, and other employees. Compensation costs are included in personnel costs on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Stock options are granted at the closing market price on the date of the grant. Options granted typically vest ratably over three years or when other conditions are met. Stock options, which represented a significant portion of our grant values, have no intrinsic value until the stock price increases. Options granted prior to May 2004 have a term of ten years. All options granted after May 2004 have a term of seven years.

98


Table of Contents

In 2012, shareholders approved the Huntington Bancshares Incorporated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) which authorized 51.0 million shares for future grants. The Plan is the only active plan under which Huntington is currently granting share based options and awards. At March 31, 2013, 34.6 million shares from the Plan were available for future grants. Huntington issues shares to fulfill stock option exercises and restricted stock unit and award vesting from available authorized common shares. At March 31, 2013, the Company believes there are adequate authorized common shares to satisfy anticipated stock option exercises and restricted stock unit and award vesting in 2013.

Huntington uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value share-based compensation expense. Forfeitures are estimated at the date of grant based on historical rates and reduce the compensation expense recognized. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the date of grant. Expected volatility is based on the estimated volatility of Huntington’s stock over the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the dividend rate and stock price at the date of the grant.

The following table illustrates the weighted-average assumptions used in the option-pricing model for options granted for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. There were no options granted for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013.

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2013 2012

Assumptions

Risk-free interest rate

% 1.17 %

Expected dividend yield

2.73

Expected volatility of Huntington’s common stock

30.0

Expected option term (years)

6.0

Weighted-average grant date fair value per share

$ $ 1.27

The following table illustrates total share-based compensation expense and related tax benefit for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Share-based compensation expense

$ 8,021 $ 5,303

Tax benefit

2,684 1,759

Huntington’s stock option activity and related information for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, was as follows:

Weighted-
Weighted- Average
Average Remaining Aggregate
Exercise Contractual Intrinsic

(amounts in thousands, except years and per share amounts)

Options Price Life (Years) Value

Outstanding at January 1, 2013

26,768 $ 8.87

Granted

Exercised

(445 ) 5.57

Forfeited/expired

(609 ) 13.52

Outstanding at March 31, 2013

25,714 $ 8.82 4.2 $ 26,954

Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2013 (1)

11,929 $ 6.29 5.6 $ 12,859

Exercisable at March 31, 2013

12,697 $ 11.40 2.9 $ 12,980

(1) The number of options expected to vest includes an estimate of expected forfeitures.

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair value of underlying stock exceeds the “in-the-money” option exercise price. For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, cash received for the exercises of stock options was $2.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The tax benefit realized from stock option exercises was $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million for each respective period.

99


Table of Contents

Huntington also grants restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance share awards and other stock-based awards. Restricted stock units and awards are issued at no cost to the recipient, and can be settled only in shares at the end of the vesting period. Restricted stock awards provide the holder with full voting rights and cash dividends during the vesting period. Restricted stock units do not provide the holder with voting rights or cash dividends during the vesting period, but do accrue a dividend equivalent that is paid upon vesting, and are subject to certain service restrictions. Performance share awards are payable contingent upon Huntington achieving certain predefined performance objectives over the three-year measurement period. The fair value of these awards is the closing market price of Huntington’s common stock on the date of award.

The following table summarizes the status of Huntington’s restricted stock units and performance share awards as of March 31, 2013, and activity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013:

Weighted- Weighted-
Average Average
Restricted Grant Date Performance Grant Date
Stock Fair Value Share Fair Value

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

Units Per Share Awards Per Share

Nonvested at January 1, 2013

8,484 $ 6.40 694 $ 6.77

Granted

3,383 7.14

Vested

(320 ) 6.58

Forfeited

(151 ) 6.43 (24 ) 6.77

Nonvested at March 31, 2013

11,396 $ 6.61 670 $ 6.77

The weighted-average grant date fair value of nonvested shares granted for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, were $7.14 and $5.88, respectively. The total fair value of awards vested was $2.1 million and $1.1 million during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively. As of March 31, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards was $51.1 million with a weighted-average expense recognition period of 2.3 years.

12. BENEFIT PLANS

Huntington sponsors the Plan, a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees hired or rehired prior to January 1, 2010. The Plan provides benefits based upon length of service and compensation levels. The funding policy of Huntington is to contribute an annual amount that is at least equal to the minimum funding requirements but not more than the amount deductible under the Internal Revenue Code. There is no required minimum contribution for 2013.

In addition, Huntington has an unfunded defined benefit post-retirement plan that provides certain healthcare and life insurance benefits to retired employees who have attained the age of 55 and have at least 10 years of vesting service under this plan. For any employee retiring on or after January 1, 1993, post-retirement healthcare benefits are based upon the employee’s number of months of service and are limited to the actual cost of coverage. Life insurance benefits are a percentage of the employee’s base salary at the time of retirement, with a maximum of $50,000 of coverage. The employer paid portion of the post-retirement health and life insurance plan was eliminated for employees retiring on and after March 1, 2010. Eligible employees retiring on and after March 1, 2010, who elect retiree medical coverage, will pay the full cost of this coverage. Huntington will not provide any employer paid life insurance to employees retiring on and after March 1, 2010. Eligible employees will be able to convert or port their existing life insurance at their own expense under the same terms that are available to all terminated employees.

The following table shows the components of net periodic benefit expense of the Plan and the Post-Retirement Benefit Plan:

Pension Benefits Post Retirement Benefits
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
March 31, March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Service cost

$ 7,134 $ 6,217 $ $

Interest cost

7,307 7,304 216 338

Expected return on plan assets

(12,091 ) (11,433 )

Amortization of transition asset

(1 )

Amortization of prior service cost

(1,442 ) (1,442 ) (338 ) (338 )

Amortization of gains (losses)

9,784 6,739 (150 ) (83 )

Settlements

1,500 1,750

Benefit expense

$ 12,192 $ 9,134 $ (272 ) $ (83 )

100


Table of Contents

The Bank, as trustee, held all Plan assets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Plan assets consisted of investments in a variety of Huntington mutual funds and Huntington common stock as follows:

Fair Value

(dollar amounts in thousands)

March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012

Cash

$ % $ 22 %

Cash equivalents:

Huntington funds—money market

1,746 6,012 1

Fixed income:

Huntington funds—fixed income funds

85,056 13 84,688 13

Corporate obligations

150,888 23 149,241 24

U.S. Government Obligations

35,464 5 36,595 6

U.S. Government Agencies

7,292 1 7,511 1

Equities:

Huntington funds

325,470 51 312,479 49

Exchange Traded Funds

974

Huntington common stock

42,719 7 37,069 6

Fair value of plan assets

$ 649,609 100 % $ 633,617 100 %

Investments of the Plan are accounted for at cost on the trade date and are reported at fair value. All of the Plan’s investments at March 31, 2013, are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy, except for corporate obligations, U.S. government obligations, and U.S. government agencies, which are classified as level 2. In general, investments of the Plan are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate risk, credit risk, and overall market volatility. Due to the level of risk associated with certain investments, it is reasonably possible changes in the values of investments will occur in the near term and such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the Plan assets.

The investment objective of the Plan is to maximize the return on Plan assets over a long time period, while meeting the Plan obligations. At March 31, 2013, Plan assets were invested less than 1% in cash and cash equivalents, 58% in equity investments, and 42% in bonds, with an average duration of 12 years on bond investments. Although it may fluctuate with market conditions, Management has targeted a long-term allocation of Plan assets of 20% to 50% in equity investments and 80% to 50% in bond investments. The allocation of Plan assets between equity investments and fixed income investments will change from time to time with the allocation to fixed income investments increasing as the funding level increases.

Huntington also sponsors other nonqualified retirement plans, the most significant being the SERP and the SRIP. The SERP provides certain former officers and directors, and the SRIP provides certain current and former officers and directors of Huntington and its subsidiaries with defined pension benefits in excess of limits imposed by federal tax law.

Huntington has a defined contribution plan that is available to eligible employees. Huntington matches participant contributions, up to the first 4% of base pay contributed to the Plan.

The following table shows the costs of providing the SERP, SRIP, and defined contribution plans:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

SERP & SRIP

$ 1,192 $ 833

Defined contribution plan

4,374 4,458

Benefit cost

$ 5,566 $ 5,291

101


Table of Contents

13. FAIR VALUES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Huntington follows the fair value accounting guidance under ASC 820 and ASC 825.

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A three-level valuation hierarchy was established for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Transfers in and out of Level 1, 2, or 3 are recorded at fair value at the beginning of the reporting period.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Mortgage loans held for sale

Huntington elected to apply the fair value option for mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell which are included in loans held for sale. Mortgage loans held for sale are classified as Level 2 and are estimated using security prices for similar product types.

Available-for-sale securities and trading account securities

Securities accounted for at fair value include both the available-for-sale and trading portfolios. Huntington uses prices obtained from third party pricing services and recent trades to determine the fair value of securities. AFS and trading securities are classified as Level 1 using quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical securities that Huntington has the ability to access at the measurement date. 1% of the positions in these portfolios are Level 1, and consist of U.S. Treasury securities and money market mutual funds. When quoted market prices are not available, fair values are classified as Level 2 using quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices of identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, and inputs that are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. 96% of the positions in these portfolios are Level 2, and consist of U.S. Government and agency debt securities, agency mortgage backed securities, asset-backed securities, municipal securities and other securities. For both Level 1 and Level 2 securities, management uses various methods and techniques to corroborate prices obtained from the pricing service, including reference to dealer or other market quotes, and by reviewing valuations of comparable instruments. If relevant market prices are limited or unavailable, valuations may require significant management judgment or estimation to determine fair value, in which case the fair values are classified as Level 3. 3% of our positions are Level 3, and consist of non-agency ALT-A asset-backed securities, private-label CMO securities, pooled-trust-preferred CDO securities and municipal securities. A significant change in the unobservable inputs for these securities may result in a significant change in the ending fair value measurement of these securities.

The Alt-A, private label CMO and pooled-trust-preferred securities portfolios are classified as Level 3 and as such use significant estimates to determine the fair value of these securities which results in greater subjectivity. The Alt-A and private label CMO securities portfolios are subjected to a monthly review of the projected cash flows, while the cash flows of the pooled-trust-preferred securities portfolio are reviewed quarterly. These reviews are supported with analysis from independent third parties, and are used as a basis for impairment analysis.

Alt-A mortgage-backed and private-label CMO securities are collateralized by first-lien residential mortgage loans. The securities valuation methodology incorporates values obtained from a third party pricing specialist using a discounted cash flow approach and a proprietary pricing model and includes assumptions management believes market participants would use to value the securities under current market conditions. The model uses inputs such as estimated prepayment speeds, losses, recoveries, default rates that are implied by the underlying performance of collateral in the structure or similar structures, house price depreciation / appreciation rates that are based upon macroeconomic forecasts and discount rates that are implied by market prices for similar securities with similar collateral structures.

Pooled-trust-preferred securities are CDOs backed by a pool of debt securities issued by financial institutions. The collateral generally consists of trust-preferred securities and subordinated debt securities issued by banks, bank holding companies, and insurance companies. A full cash flow analysis is used to estimate fair values and assess impairment for each security within this portfolio. We engage a third party pricing specialist with direct industry experience in pooled-trust-preferred securities valuations to provide assistance in estimating the fair value and expected cash flows for each security in this portfolio. The PD of each issuer and the market discount rate are the most significant inputs in determining fair value. Management evaluates the PD assumptions provided by the third party pricing specialist by comparing the current PD to the assumptions used the previous quarter, actual defaults and deferrals in the current period, and trend data on certain financial ratios of the issuers. Huntington also evaluates the assumptions related to discount rates. Relying on cash flows is necessary because there was a lack of observable transactions in the market and many of the original sponsors or dealers for these securities are no longer able to provide a fair value that is compliant with ASC 820

102


Table of Contents

Huntington utilizes the same processes to determine the fair value of investment securities classified as held-to-maturity for impairment evaluation purposes.

Automobile loans

Effective January 1, 2010, Huntington consolidated an automobile loan securitization that previously had been accounted for as an off-balance sheet transaction. As a result, Huntington elected to account for the automobile loan receivables and the associated notes payable at fair value per guidance supplied in ASC 825. The automobile loan receivables are classified as Level 3. The key assumptions used to determine the fair value of the automobile loan receivables included projections of expected losses and prepayment of the underlying loans in the portfolio and a market assumption of interest rate spreads. Certain interest rates are available from similarly traded securities while other interest rates are developed internally based on similar asset-backed security transactions in the market.

MSRs

MSRs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the fair value of these assets is classified as Level 3. Huntington determines the fair value of MSRs using an income approach model based upon our month-end interest rate curve and prepayment assumptions. The model, which is operated and maintained by a third party, utilizes assumptions to estimate future net servicing income cash flows, including estimates of time decay, payoffs, and changes in valuation inputs and assumptions. Servicing brokers and other sources of information (e.g. discussion with other mortgage servicers and industry surveys) are used to obtain information on market practice and assumptions. On at least a quarterly basis, third party marks are obtained from at least one service broker. Huntington reviews the valuation assumptions against this market data for reasonableness and adjusts the assumptions if deemed appropriate. Any recommended change in assumptions and / or inputs are presented for review to the Mortgage Price Risk Subcommittee for final approval.

Derivatives

Derivatives classified as Level 1 consist of exchange traded options and forward commitments to deliver mortgage-backed securities which are valued using quoted prices. Asset and liability conversion swaps and options, and interest rate caps are classified as Level 2. These derivative positions are valued using a discounted cash flow method that incorporates current market interest rates. Derivatives classified as Level 3 consist primarily of interest rate lock agreements related to mortgage loan commitments. The determination of fair value includes assumptions related to the likelihood that a commitment will ultimately result in a closed loan, which is a significant unobservable assumption. A significant increase or decrease in the external market price would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.

Securitization trust notes payable

Consists of certain securitization trust notes payable related to the automobile loan receivables measured at fair value. The notes payable are classified as Level 2 and are valued based on interest rates for similar financial instruments.

Assets and Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are summarized below:

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Netting Balance at

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Adjustments (1) March 31, 2013

Assets

Loans held for sale

$ $ 415,126 $ $ $ 415,126

Trading account securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed

96 96

Federal agencies: Other agencies

Municipal securities

6,835 6,835

Other securities

78,953 636 79,589

78,953 7,567 86,520

Available-for-sale and other securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

52,066 52,066

103


Table of Contents

Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed

4,176,933 4,176,933

Federal agencies: Other agencies

354,491 354,491

Municipal securities

531,967 59,098 591,065

Private-label CMO

21,434 45,546 66,980

Asset-backed securities

983,408 115,455 1,098,863

Covered bonds

289,409 289,409

Corporate debt

541,715 541,715

Other securities

16,979 4,400 21,379

69,045 6,903,757 220,099 7,192,901

Automobile loans

116,039 116,039

MSRs

35,582 35,582

Derivative assets

8,511 412,383 9,530 (99,693 ) 330,731

Liabilities

Derivative liabilities

8,794 200,453 524 (71,491 ) 138,280

Other liabilities

278 278

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Netting Balance at

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Adjustments (1) December 31, 2012

Assets

Mortgage loans held for sale

$ $ 452,949 $ $ $ 452,949

Trading account securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed

Federal agencies: Other agencies

Municipal securities

15,218 15,218

Other securities

75,729 258 75,987

75,729 15,476 91,205

Available-for-sale and other securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

52,311 52,311

Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed

4,264,670 4,264,670

Federal agencies: Other agencies

359,626 359,626

Municipal securities

439,772 61,228 501,000

Private-label CMO

22,793 48,775 71,568

Asset-backed securities

919,046 110,037 1,029,083

Covered bonds

290,625 290,625

Corporate debt

668,142 668,142

Other securities

17,177 3,898 21,075

69,488 6,968,572 220,040 7,258,100

Automobile loans

142,762 142,762

MSRs

35,202 35,202

Derivative assets

6,368 465,517 13,180 (99,368 ) 385,697

Liabilities

Derivative liabilities

6,813 228,312 478 (83,415 ) 152,188

Other liabilities

(1) Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle positive and negative positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

The tables below present a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, for financial instruments measured on a recurring basis and classified as Level 3. The classification of an item as Level 3 is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 measurements may also include observable components of value that can be validated externally. Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.

104


Table of Contents
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Available-for-sale securities
Asset-
Derivative Municipal Private- backed Automobile

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs instruments securities label CMO securities loans

Opening balance

$ 35,202 $ 12,702 $ 61,228 $ 48,775 $ 110,037 $ 142,762

Transfers into Level 3

Transfers out of Level 3

Total gains/losses for the period:

Included in earnings

380 (1,482 ) (270 ) (738 ) 1,137

Included in OCI

155 891 12,789

Purchases

Sales

Repayments

(27,860 )

Issues

Settlements

(2,214 ) (2,285 ) (3,850 ) (6,633 )

Closing balance

$ 35,582 $ 9,006 $ 59,098 $ 45,546 $ 115,455 $ 116,039

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) for assets held at end of the reporting date

$ 380 $ (3,696 ) $ 155 $ 891 $ 12,789 $ 1,137

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Available-for-sale securities
Asset-
Derivative Municipal Private- backed Automobile

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs instruments securities label CMO securities loans

Opening balance

$ 65,001 $ (169 ) $ 95,092 $ 72,364 $ 121,698 $ 296,250

Transfers into Level 3

Transfers out of Level 3

Total gains/losses for the period:

Included in earnings

(2,547 ) 725 (990 ) (176 ) (92 )

Included in OCI

4,173 7,793

Purchases

Sales

Repayments

(45,384 )

Issues

Settlements

6,887 (9,645 ) (5,316 ) (3,619 )

Closing balance

$ 62,454 $ 7,443 $ 85,447 $ 70,231 $ 125,696 $ 250,774

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) for assets held at end of the reporting date

$ (2,547 ) $ 559 $ $ (4,178 ) $ (7,793 ) $ (92 )

105


Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the classification of gains and losses due to changes in fair value, recorded in earnings for Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Available-for-sale securities
Asset-
Derivative Municipal Private- backed Automobile

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs instruments securities label CMO securities loans

Classification of gains and losses in earnings:

Mortgage banking income (loss)

$ 380 $ (1,482 ) $ $ $ $

Securities gains (losses)

(336 ) (359 )

Interest and fee income

66 (379 ) (859 )

Noninterest income

1,996

Total

$ 380 $ (1,482 ) $ $ (270 ) $ (738 ) $ 1,137

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Available-for-sale securities
Asset-
Derivative Municipal Private- backed Automobile

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs instruments securities label CMO securities loans

Classification of gains and losses in earnings:

Mortgage banking income (loss)

$ (2,547 ) $ 1,393 $ $ $ $

Securities gains (losses)

(1,237 )

Interest and fee income

247 (176 ) (2,024 )

Noninterest income

(668 ) 1,932

Total

$ (2,547 ) $ 725 $ $ (990 ) $ (176 ) $ (92 )

Assets and liabilities under the fair value option

The following table presents the fair value and aggregate principal balance of certain assets and liabilities under the fair value option:

March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Fair value Aggregate Fair value Aggregate
carrying unpaid carrying unpaid
amount principal Difference amount principal Difference

Assets

Mortgage loans held for sale

$ 415,126 $ 405,095 $ 10,031 $ 452,949 $ 438,254 $ 14,695

Automobile loans

116,039 113,056 2,983 142,762 140,916 1,846

Liabilities

The following tables present the net gains (losses) from fair value changes, including net gains (losses) associated with instrument specific credit risk for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Net gains (losses) from fair value changes
Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Assets

Mortgage loans held for sale

$ (4,663 ) $ (4,895 )

Automobile loans

1,137 (93 )

Liabilities

Securitization trust notes payable

(1,344 )

106


Table of Contents
Gains (losses) included
in fair value changes associated
with instrument specific credit risk
Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Assets

Automobile loans

$ 326 $ 566

Assets and Liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

Certain assets and liabilities may be required to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition. These assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an on-going basis; however, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment. At March 31, 2013, assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as follows:

Fair Value Measurements Using
Quoted Prices Significant Significant Total
In Active Other Other Gains/(Losses)
Markets for Observable Unobservable For the Three
Fair Value at Identical Assets Inputs Inputs Months Ended

(dollar amounts in thousands)

March 31, 2013 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) March 31, 2013

Impaired loans

$ 13,122 $ $ $ 13,122 $ (3,320 )

Accrued income and other assets

25,139 25,139 (1,159 )

Periodically, Huntington records nonrecurring adjustments of collateral-dependent loans measured for impairment when establishing the ACL. Such amounts are generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan. Appraisals are generally obtained to support the fair value of the collateral and incorporate measures such as recent sales prices for comparable properties and cost of construction. In cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, an impairment charge is recognized. At March 31, 2013, Huntington identified $13.1 million of impaired loans for which the fair value is recorded based upon collateral value. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, nonrecurring fair value impairment of $3.3 million was recorded within the provision for credit losses.

Other real estate owned properties are initially valued based on appraisals and third party price opinions, less estimated selling costs. At March 31, 2013, Huntington had $25.1 million of OREO assets. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, fair value losses of $1.2 million were recorded within noninterest expense.

107


Table of Contents

Significant unobservable inputs for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis

The table below presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

Significant
Fair Value at Valuation Unobservable Range

(dollar amounts in thousands)

March 31, 2013

Technique

Input

(Weighted Average)

MSRs

$ 35,582 Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 7.0% - 37.0%(16.0%)
Spread over forward interest rate swap rates -499 - 4,609(1,306)

Derivative assets

9,530 Consensus Pricing Net market price -2.6% - 12.3%(2.5%)

Derivative liabilities

524 Estimated Pull thru % 38.0% - 89.0%(73.0%)

Municipal securities

59,098 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 1.7% - 12.0%(3.2%)

Private-label CMO

45,546 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 3.0% - 7.9%(5.9%)
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 5.1% - 26.7%(14.3%)
Probability of default 0.1% - 4.0%(1.3%)
Loss Severity 0.0% - 64.0%(26.5%)

Asset-backed securities

115,455 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 4.3% - 16.3%(8.9%)
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 5.1% - 5.1%(5.1%)
Cumulative prepayment rate 0.0% - 100.0%(16.5%)
Constant default 1.5% - 4.0%(2.7%)
Cumulative default 0.9% - 100.0%(18.6%)
Loss given default 85.0% - 100.0%(94.4%)
Cure given deferral 0.0% - 75.0%(35.4%)
Loss severity 69.0% - 69.0%(69.0%)

Automobile loans

116,039 Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 15.6%
Discount rate 0.2% - 5.0%(1.3%)

Impaired loans

13,122 Appraisal value NA NA

Other real estate owned

25,139 Appraisal value NA NA

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value at Valuation Significant Range

(dollar amounts in thousands)

December 31, 2012

Technique

Unobservable Input

(Weighted Average)

MSRs

$ 35,202 Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 10.0% - 31.0%(20.0%)
Spread over forward interest rate swap rates -568 - 4,552(1,288)

Derivative assets

13,180 Consensus Pricing Net market price -2.3% - 10.8%(3.0%)

Derivative liabilities

478 Estimated Pull thru % 38.0% - 89.0%(75.0%)

Municipal securities

61,228 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 1.7% - 12.0%(3.1%)

Private-label CMO

48,775 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 3.0% - 8.5%(6.2%)
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 5.1% - 26.7%(14.8%)
Probability of default 0.1% - 4.0%(1.0%)
Loss Severity 0.0% - 64.0%(27.8%)

Asset-backed securities

110,037 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 4.5% - 16.6%(9.0%)
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 5.1% - 9.8%(5.3%)

108


Table of Contents
Cumulative prepayment rate 0.0% - 100.0% (6.9%)
Constant default 0.3% - 4.0%(2.8%)
Cumulative default 1.1% - 100.0%(20.1%)
Loss given default 85.0% - 100.0%(92.4%)
Cure given deferral 0.0% - 90.0%(34.7%)
Loss severity 20.0% - 72.0%(64.9%)

Automobile loans

142,762 Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 15.6%
Discount rate 0.8% - 5.0%(4.0%)

Impaired loans

150,873 Appraisal value

Other real estate owned

28,097 Appraisal value

The following provides a general description of the impact of a change in an unobservable input on the fair value measurement and the interrelationship between unobservable inputs, where relevant/significant. Interrelationships may also exist between observable and unobservable inputs. Such relationships have not been included in the discussion below.

A significant change in the unobservable inputs may result in a significant change in the ending fair value measurement of Level 3 instruments. In general, prepayment rates increase when market interest rates decline and decrease when market interest rates rise and higher prepayment rates generally result in lower fair values for MSR assets, Private-label CMO securities, Asset-backed securities, and automobile loans.

Credit loss estimates, such as probability of default, constant default, cumulative default, loss given default, cure given deferral, and loss severity, are driven by the ability of the borrowers to pay their loans and the value of the underlying collateral and are impacted by changes in macroeconomic conditions, typically increasing when economic conditions worsen and decreasing when conditions improve. An increase in the estimated prepayment rate typically results in a decrease in estimated credit losses and vice versa. Higher credit loss estimates generally result in lower fair values. Credit spreads generally increase when liquidity risks and market volatility increase and decrease when liquidity conditions and market volatility improve.

Discount rates and spread over forward interest rate swap rates typically increase when market interest rates increase and/or credit and liquidity risks increase and decrease when market interest rates decline and/or credit and liquidity conditions improve. Higher discount rates and credit spreads generally result in lower fair market values.

Net market price and pull through percentages generally increase when market interest rates increase and decline when market interest rates decline. Higher net market price and pull through percentages generally result in higher fair values.

109


Table of Contents

Fair values of financial instruments

The following table provides the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of Huntington’s financial instruments that are carried either at fair value or cost at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amount Value Amount Value

Financial Assets:

Cash and short-term assets

$ 900,005 $ 900,005 $ 1,333,727 $ 1,333,727

Trading account securities

86,520 86,520 91,205 91,205

Loans held for sale

729,707 737,211 764,309 773,013

Available-for-sale and other securities

7,504,639 7,504,639 7,566,175 7,566,175

Held-to-maturity securities

1,693,074 1,733,454 1,743,876 1,794,105

Net loans and leases

40,536,755 38,811,780 39,959,350 38,401,965

Derivatives

330,731 330,731 385,697 385,697

Financial Liabilities:

Deposits

46,867,141 46,953,781 46,252,683 46,330,715

Short-term borrowings

732,705 726,310 589,814 584,671

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

183,491 183,491 1,008,959 1,008,959

Other long-term debt

156,301 154,156 158,784 156,719

Subordinated notes

1,188,674 1,184,891 1,197,091 1,183,827

Derivatives

138,280 138,280 152,188 152,188

The following table presents the level in the fair value hierarchy for the estimated fair values of only Huntington’s financial instruments that are not already on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Estimated Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Balance at

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 March 31, 2013

Financial Assets

Loans held for sale

$ $ $ 314,807 $ 314,807

Held-to-maturity securities

1,733,454 1,733,454

Net loans and leases

38,695,741 38,695,741

Financial liabilities

Deposits

40,136,635 6,817,146 46,953,781

Short-term borrowings

726,310 726,310

Other long-term debt

154,156 154,156

Subordinated notes

1,184,891 1,184,891
Estimated Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Balance at

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 December 31, 2012

Financial Assets

Loans held for sale

$ $ $ 316,007 $ 316,007

Held-to-maturity securities

1,794,105 1,794,105

Net loans and leases

38,259,203 38,259,203

Financial liabilities

Deposits

39,136,127 7,194,588 46,330,715

Short-term borrowings

584,671 584,671

Other long-term debt

2,124 154,595 156,719

Subordinated notes

1,183,827 1,183,827

The short-term nature of certain assets and liabilities result in their carrying value approximating fair value. These include trading account securities, customers’ acceptance liabilities, short-term borrowings, bank acceptances outstanding, FHLB advances, and cash and short-term assets, which include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in banks, and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. Loan commitments and letters-of-credit generally have short-term, variable-rate features and contain clauses that limit Huntington’s exposure to changes in customer credit quality. Accordingly, their carrying values, which are immaterial at the respective balance sheet dates, are reasonable estimates of fair value. Not all the financial instruments listed in the table above are subject to the disclosure provisions of ASC Topic 820.

110


Table of Contents

Certain assets, the most significant being operating lease assets, bank owned life insurance, and premises and equipment, do not meet the definition of a financial instrument and are excluded from this disclosure. Similarly, mortgage and nonmortgage servicing rights, deposit base, and other customer relationship intangibles are not considered financial instruments and are not included above. Accordingly, this fair value information is not intended to, and does not, represent Huntington’s underlying value. Many of the assets and liabilities subject to the disclosure requirements are not actively traded, requiring fair values to be estimated by Management. These estimations necessarily involve the use of judgment about a wide variety of factors, including but not limited to, relevancy of market prices of comparable instruments, expected future cash flows, and appropriate discount rates.

The following methods and assumptions were used by Huntington to estimate the fair value of the remaining classes of financial instruments:

Held-to-maturity securities

Fair values are determined by using models that are based on security-specific details, as well as relevant industry and economic factors. The most significant of these inputs are quoted market prices, and interest rate spreads on relevant benchmark securities.

Loans and direct financing leases

Variable-rate loans that reprice frequently are based on carrying amounts, as adjusted for estimated credit losses. The fair values for other loans and leases are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses and employ interest rates currently being offered for loans and leases with similar terms. The rates take into account the position of the yield curve, as well as an adjustment for prepayment risk, operating costs, and profit. This value is also reduced by an estimate of expected losses and the credit risk associated in the loan and lease portfolio. The valuation of the loan portfolio reflected discounts that Huntington believed are consistent with transactions occurring in the marketplace.

Deposits

Demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair values of fixed-rate time deposits are estimated by discounting cash flows using interest rates currently being offered on certificates with similar maturities.

Debt

Fixed-rate, long-term debt is based upon quoted market prices, which are inclusive of Huntington’s credit risk. In the absence of quoted market prices, discounted cash flows using market rates for similar debt with the same maturities are used in the determination of fair value.

14. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Derivative financial instruments are recorded in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as either an asset or a liability (in accrued income and other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively) and measured at fair value.

Derivatives used in Asset and Liability Management Activities

A variety of derivative financial instruments, principally interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and collars are used in asset and liability management activities to protect against the risk of adverse price or interest rate movements. These instruments provide flexibility in adjusting Huntington’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates without exposure to loss of principal and higher funding requirements.

The following table presents the gross notional values of derivatives used in Huntington’s asset and liability management activities at March 31, 2013, identified by the underlying interest rate-sensitive instruments:

Fair Value Cash Flow

(dollar amounts in thousands )

Hedges Hedges Total

Instruments associated with:

Loans

$ $ 9,169,000 $ 9,169,000

Deposits

691,875 691,875

Subordinated notes

598,000 598,000

Other long-term debt

35,000 35,000

Total notional value at March 31, 2013

$ 1,324,875 $ 9,169,000 $ 10,493,875

111


Table of Contents

The following table presents additional information about the interest rate swaps used in Huntington’s asset and liability management activities at March 31, 2013:

Average Weighted-Average
Notional Maturity Fair Rate

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Value (years) Value Receive Pay

Asset conversion swaps

Receive fixed—generic

$ 9,169,000 2.7 $ 47,023 1.01 % 0.46 %

Total asset conversion swaps

9,169,000 2.7 47,023 1.01 0.46

Liability conversion swaps

Receive fixed—generic

1,324,875 2.9 100,272 2.88 0.36

Total liability conversion swaps

1,324,875 2.9 100,272 2.88 0.36

Total swap portfolio

$ 10,493,875 2.7 $ 147,295 1.24 % 0.45 %

These derivative financial instruments were entered into for the purpose of managing the interest rate risk of assets and liabilities. Consequently, net amounts receivable or payable on contracts hedging either interest earning assets or interest bearing liabilities were accrued as an adjustment to either interest income or interest expense. The net amounts resulted in an increase to net interest income of $25.1 million and $24.7 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

In connection with securitization activities, Huntington purchased interest rate caps with a notional value totaling $0.6 billion. These purchased caps were assigned to the securitization trust for the benefit of the security holders. Interest rate caps were also sold totaling $0.6 billion outside the securitization structure. Both the purchased and sold caps are marked to market through income.

In connection with the sale of Huntington’s Class B Visa ® shares, Huntington entered into a swap agreement with the purchaser of the shares. The swap agreement adjusts for dilution in the conversion ratio of Class B shares resulting from the Visa ® litigation. At March 31, 2013, the fair value of the swap liability of $0.4 million is an estimate of the exposure liability based upon Huntington’s assessment of the probability-weighted potential Visa ® litigation losses and certain fixed payments required to be made through the term of the swap.

The following table presents the fair values at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 of Huntington’s financial instruments. Amounts in the table below are presented gross without the impact of any net collateral arrangements:

Asset derivatives included in accrued income and other assets:

March 31, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Interest rate contracts designated as hedging instruments

$ 147,295 $ 169,222

Interest rate contracts not designated as hedging instruments

265,088 296,295

Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments

7,736 5,605

Commodities contracts not designated as hedging instruments

69

Total contracts

$ 420,188 $ 471,122

Liability derivatives included in accrued expenses and other liabilities

March 31, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Interest rate contracts designated as hedging instruments

$ $

Interest rate contracts not designated as hedging instruments

200,898 228,757

Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments

6,594 4,655

Commodities contracts not designated as hedging instruments

57

Total contracts

$ 207,549 $ 233,412

Fair value hedges are established to convert deposits and subordinated and other long-term debt from fixed-rate obligations to floating rate. The changes in fair value of the derivative are, to the extent that the hedging relationship is effective, recorded through earnings and offset against changes in the fair value of the hedged item.

112


Table of Contents

The following table presents the change in fair value for derivatives designated as fair value hedges as well as the offsetting change in fair value on the hedged item for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Interest rate contracts

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging deposits (1)

$ (1,754 ) $ 533

Change in fair value of hedged deposits (1)

1,748 (594 )

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging subordinated notes (2)

(8,121 ) (8,758 )

Change in fair value of hedged subordinated notes (2)

8,121 8,758

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging other long-term debt (2)

(397 ) (347 )

Change in fair value of hedged other long-term debt (2)

397 347

(1) Effective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in Interest expense—deposits in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Any resulting ineffective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2) Effective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in Interest expense—subordinated notes and other long-term debt in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Any resulting ineffective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

For cash flow hedges, interest rate swap contracts were entered into that pay fixed-rate interest in exchange for the receipt of variable-rate interest without the exchange of the contract’s underlying notional amount, which effectively converts a portion of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate debt. This reduces the potentially adverse impact of increases in interest rates on future interest expense. Other LIBOR-based commercial and industrial loans as well as investment securities were effectively converted to fixed-rate by entering into contracts that swap certain variable-rate interest payments for fixed-rate interest payments at designated times.

To the extent these derivatives are effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flows, changes in the derivatives’ fair value will not be included in current earnings but are reported as a component of OCI in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity. These changes in fair value will be included in earnings of future periods when earnings are also affected by the changes in the hedged cash flows. To the extent these derivatives are not effective, changes in their fair values are immediately included in noninterest income.

The following table presents the gains and (losses) recognized in OCI and the location in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income of gains and (losses) reclassified from OCI into earnings for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 for derivatives designated as effective cash flow hedges:

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships

Amount of gain or
(loss) recognized in
OCI on derivatives
(effective portion)
(after-tax)

Location of gain or (loss) reclassified from

accumulated OCI into earnings (effective portion)

Amount of (gain) or loss
reclassified from
accumulated OCI into
earnings (effective
portion)
Three Months Ended Three Months
Ended
March 31, March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Interest rate contracts

Loans

$ (10,339 ) $ (25,827 ) Interest and fee income - loans and leases $ (3,916 ) $ 24,786

Investment Securities

35 Noninterest income - other income (110 )

FHLB Advances

Interest expense - federal home loan bank advances

Deposits

Interest expense - deposits

Subordinated notes

Interest expense - subordinated notes and other long-term debt 7

Other long term debt

Interest expense - subordinated notes and other long-term debt

Total

$ (10,339 ) $ (25,792 ) $ (4,026 ) $ 24,793

During the next twelve months, Huntington expects to reclassify to earnings $32.1 million of after-tax unrealized gains on cash flow hedging derivatives currently in OCI.

113


Table of Contents

The following table details the gains and (losses) recognized in noninterest income on the ineffective portion on interest rate contracts for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.

Three Months Ended
March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships

Interest rate contracts

Loans

$ 288 $ 14

FHLB Advances

Derivatives used in trading activities

Various derivative financial instruments are offered to enable customers to meet their financing and investing objectives and for their risk management purposes. Derivative financial instruments used in trading activities consisted predominantly of interest rate swaps, but also included interest rate caps, floors, and futures, as well as foreign exchange options and commodity contracts. Interest rate options grant the option holder the right to buy or sell an underlying financial instrument for a predetermined price before the contract expires. Interest rate futures are commitments to either purchase or sell a financial instrument at a future date for a specified price or yield and may be settled in cash or through delivery of the underlying financial instrument. Interest rate caps and floors are option-based contracts that entitle the buyer to receive cash payments based on the difference between a designated reference rate and a strike price, applied to a notional amount. Written options, primarily caps, expose Huntington to market risk but not credit risk. Purchased options contain both credit and market risk. The interest rate risk of these customer derivatives is mitigated by entering into similar derivatives having offsetting terms with other counterparties. The credit risk to these customers is evaluated and included in the calculation of fair value.

The net fair values of these derivative financial instruments, for which the gross amounts are included in accrued income and other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, were $62.0 million and $63.4 million, respectively. The total notional values of derivative financial instruments used by Huntington on behalf of customers, including offsetting derivatives, were $12.0 billion at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Huntington’s credit risks from derivative financial instruments used for trading purposes were $261.9 million and $296.1 million at the same dates, respectively.

Financial assets and liabilities that are offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

Huntington records derivatives at fair value as further described in Note 13. Huntington records these derivatives net of any master netting arrangement in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Collateral agreements are regularly entered into as part of the underlying derivative agreements with Huntington’s counterparties to mitigate counterparty credit risk.

All derivatives are carried on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Derivative balances are presented on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements. Cash collateral exchanged with counterparties is also netted against the applicable derivative fair values. Huntington enters into derivative transactions with two primary groups: broker-dealers and banks, and Huntington’s customers. Different methods are utilized for managing counterparty credit exposure and credit risk for each of these groups.

Huntington enters into transactions with broker-dealers and banks for various risk management purposes. These types of transactions generally are high dollar volume. Huntington enters into bilateral collateral and master netting agreements with these counterparties, and routinely exchange cash and high quality securities collateral with these counterparties. Huntington enters into transactions with customers to meet their financing, investing, payment and risk management needs. These types of transactions generally are low dollar volume. Huntington generally enters into master netting agreements with customer counterparties, however collateral is generally not exchanged with customer counterparties.

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, aggregate credit risk associated with these derivatives, net of collateral that has been pledged by the counterparty, was $16.2 million and $17.4 million, respectively. The credit risk associated with interest rate swaps is calculated after considering master netting agreements with broker-dealers and banks.

At March 31, 2013, Huntington pledged $163.4 million of investment securities and cash collateral to counterparties, while other counterparties pledged $149.4 million of investment securities and cash collateral to Huntington to satisfy collateral netting agreements. In the event of credit downgrades, Huntington would not be required to provide additional collateral.

114


Table of Contents

The following tables present the gross amounts of these assets and liabilities with any offsets to arrive at the net amounts recognized in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets

Gross amounts not offset in the
condensed consolidated  balance
sheets

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Gross amounts
of recognized
assets
Gross amounts
offset in the
condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
Net amounts of
assets
presented in
the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
Financial
instruments
cash collateral
received
Net amount

Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets

March 31, 2013              Derivatives

$ 425,070 $ (104,575 ) $ 320,495 $ (47,428 ) $ (2,321 ) $ 270,746

December 31, 2012         Derivatives

473,374 (101,620 ) 371,754 (62,409 ) (755 ) 308,590

Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities

Gross amounts not offset in the
condensed consolidated  balance
sheets

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Gross amounts
of recognized
liabilities
Gross amounts
offset in the
condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
Net amounts of
assets
presented in
the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
Financial
instruments
cash collateral
received
Net amount

Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities

March 31, 2013              Derivatives

$ 212,430 $ (76,372 ) $ 136,058 $ (91,434 ) $ (469 ) $ 44,155

December 31, 2012         Derivatives

235,664 (85,667 ) 149,997 (97,233 ) (455 ) 52,309

Derivatives used in mortgage banking activities

Huntington also uses certain derivative financial instruments to offset changes in value of its MSRs. These derivatives consist primarily of forward interest rate agreements and forward commitments to deliver mortgage-backed securities. The derivative instruments used are not designated as hedges. Accordingly, such derivatives are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in mortgage banking income . The following table summarizes the derivative assets and liabilities used in mortgage banking activities

115


Table of Contents
March 31, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Derivative assets:

Interest rate lock agreements

$ 9,530 $ 13,180

Forward trades and options

706 763

Total derivative assets

10,236 13,943

Derivative liabilities:

Interest rate lock agreements

(79 ) (33 )

Forward trades and options

(2,143 ) (2,158 )

Total derivative liabilities

(2,222 ) (2,191 )

Net derivative asset (liability)

$ 8,014 $ 11,752

The total notional value of these derivative financial instruments at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, was $2.4 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively. The total notional amount at March 31, 2013, corresponds to trading assets with a fair value of $5.5 million and trading liabilities with a fair value of $1.7 million. Total MSR hedging gains and (losses) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, were $(7.9) million and $(2.2) million, respectively. Included in total MSR hedging gains and losses for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were net gains and (losses) related to derivative instruments of $(7.9) million and $(2.3) million, respectively. These amounts are included in mortgage banking income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

15. VIEs

Consolidated VIEs

Consolidated VIEs at March 31, 2013, consisted of automobile loan and lease securitization trusts formed in 2009 and 2006. Huntington has determined the trusts are VIEs. Huntington has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of these trusts because it has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and it has either the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The following tables present the carrying amount and classification of the consolidated trusts’ assets and liabilities that were included in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

March 31, 2013
2009 2006 Other
Automobile Automobile Consolidated

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Trust Trust Trusts Total

Assets:

Cash

$ 12,976 $ 123,870 $ $ 136,846

Loans and leases

116,039 293,378 409,417

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(2,083 ) (2,083 )

Net loans and leases

116,039 291,295 407,334

Accrued income and other assets

496 949 281 1,726

Total assets

$ 129,511 $ 416,114 $ 281 $ 545,906

Liabilities:

Other long-term debt

$ $ $ $

Accrued interest and other liabilities

281 281

Total liabilities

$ $ $ 281 $ 281

116


Table of Contents
December 31, 2012
2009 2006 Other
Automobile Automobile Consolidated

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Trust Trust Trusts Total

Assets:

Cash

$ 12,577 $ 91,113 $ $ 103,690

Loans and leases

142,762 356,162 498,924

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(2,671 ) (2,671 )

Net loans and leases

142,762 353,491 496,253

Accrued income and other assets

617 1,353 288 2,258

Total assets

$ 155,956 $ 445,957 $ 288 $ 602,201

Liabilities:

Other long-term debt

$ $ 2,086 $ $ 2,086

Accrued interest and other liabilities

1 288 289

Total liabilities

$ $ 2,087 $ 288 $ 2,375

The automobile loans and leases were designated to repay the securitized notes. Huntington services the loans and leases and uses the proceeds from principal and interest payments to pay the securitized notes during the amortization period. Huntington has not provided financial or other support that was not previously contractually required.

Unconsolidated VIEs

The following tables provide a summary of the assets and liabilities included in Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the maximum exposure to losses, associated with its’ interests related to unconsolidated VIEs for which Huntington holds an interest, but is not the primary beneficiary, to the VIE at March 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012:

March 31, 2013

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Total Assets Total Liabilities Maximum Exposure to Loss

2012-1 Automobile Trust

$ 10,586 $ $ 10,586

2012-2 Automobile Trust

11,990 11,990

2011 Automobile Trust

5,876 5,876

Tower Hill Securities, Inc.

85,056 65,000 85,056

Trust Preferred Securities

13,764 312,894

Low Income Housing Tax Credit Partnerships

328,105 116,070 328,105

Total

$ 455,377 $ 493,964 $ 441,613
December 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Total Assets Total Liabilities Maximum Exposure to Loss

2012-1 Automobile Trust

$ 12,649 $ $ 12,649

2012-2 Automobile Trust

13,616 13,616

2011 Automobile Trust

7,076 7,076

Tower Hill Securities, Inc.

87,075 65,000 87,075

Trust Preferred Securities

13,764 312,894

Low Income Housing Tax Credit Partnerships

391,878 152,047 391,878

Total

$ 526,058 $ 529,941 $ 512,294

117


Table of Contents

2012-1 AUTOMOBILE TRUST, 2012-2 AUTOMOBILE TRUST, and 2011 AUTOMOBILE TRUST

During the 2012 fourth quarter, 2012 first quarter and 2011 third quarter, we transferred automobile loans totaling $1.0 billion, $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, to trusts in securitization transactions. The securitizations and the resulting sale of all underlying securities qualified for sale accounting. Huntington has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of these trusts because it has neither the obligation to absorb losses of the entities that could potentially be significant to the VIEs nor the right to receive benefits from the entities that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. Huntington is not required and does not currently intend to provide any additional financial support to the trusts. Investors and creditors only have recourse to the assets held by the trusts. The interest Huntington holds in the VIEs relates to servicing rights which are included within accrued income and other assets of Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The maximum exposure to loss is equal to the carrying value of the servicing asset.

TOWER HILL SECURITIES, INC.

In 2010, we transferred approximately $92.1 million of municipal securities, $86.0 million in Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (Real Estate Investment Trust) Class E Preferred Stock and cash of $6.1 million to Tower Hill Securities, Inc. in exchange for $184.1 million of Common and Preferred Stock of Tower Hill Securities, Inc. The municipal securities and the REIT Shares will be used to satisfy $65.0 million of mandatorily redeemable securities issued by Tower Hill Securities, Inc. and are not available to satisfy the general debts and obligations of Huntington or any consolidated affiliates. The transfer was recorded as a secured financing. Interests held by Huntington consist of municipal securities within available for sale and other securities and Series B preferred securities within other long term debt of Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The maximum exposure to loss is equal to the carrying value of the municipal securities.

TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES

Huntington has certain wholly-owned trusts whose assets, liabilities, equity, income, and expenses are not included within Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. These trusts have been formed for the sole purpose of issuing trust-preferred securities, from which the proceeds are then invested in Huntington junior subordinated debentures, which are reflected in Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as subordinated notes. The trust securities are the obligations of the trusts, and as such, are not consolidated within Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. A list of trust preferred securities outstanding at March 31, 2013 follows:

Principal amount of Investment in
subordinated note/ unconsolidated

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Rate debenture issued to trust (1) subsidiary

Huntington Capital I

1.00 %(2) $ 111,816 $ 6,186

Huntington Capital II

0.91 (3) 54,593 3,093

Sky Financial Capital Trust III

1.68 (4) 72,165 2,165

Sky Financial Capital Trust IV

1.71 (4) 74,320 2,320

Total

$ 312,894 $ 13,764

(1) Represents the principal amount of debentures issued to each trust, including unamortized original issue discount.
(2) Variable effective rate at March 31, 2013, based on three month LIBOR + 0.70.
(3) Variable effective rate at March 31, 2013, based on three month LIBOR + 0.625.
(4) Variable effective rate at March 31, 2013, based on three month LIBOR + 1.40.

Each issue of the junior subordinated debentures has an interest rate equal to the corresponding trust securities distribution rate. Huntington has the right to defer payment of interest on the debentures at any time, or from time-to-time for a period not exceeding five years provided that no extension period may extend beyond the stated maturity of the related debentures. During any such extension period, distributions to the trust securities will also be deferred and Huntington’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock will be restricted. Periodic cash payments and payments upon liquidation or redemption with respect to trust securities are guaranteed by Huntington to the extent of funds held by the trusts. The guarantee ranks subordinate and junior in right of payment to all indebtedness of the Company to the same extent as the junior subordinated debt. The guarantee does not place a limitation on the amount of additional indebtedness that may be incurred by Huntington.

118


Table of Contents

LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PARTNERSHIPS

Huntington makes certain equity investments in various limited partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital, to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings, and to assist in achieving goals associated with the Community Reinvestment Act. The primary activities of the limited partnerships include the identification, development, and operation of multi family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants. Generally, these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity.

Huntington is a limited partner in each Low Income Housing Tax Credit Partnership. A separate unrelated third party is the general partner. Each limited partnership is managed by the general partner, who exercises full and exclusive control over the affairs of the limited partnership. The general partner has all the rights, powers and authority granted or permitted to be granted to a general partner of a limited partnership under the Ohio Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. Duties entrusted to the general partner of each limited partnership include, but are not limited to: investment in operating companies, company expenditures, investment of excess funds, borrowing funds, employment of agents, disposition of fund property, prepayment and refinancing of liabilities, votes and consents, contract authority, disbursement of funds, accounting methods, tax elections, bank accounts, insurance, litigation, cash reserve, and use of working capital reserve funds. Except for limited rights granted to consent to certain transactions, the limited partner(s) may not participate in the operation, management, or control of the limited partnership’s business, transact any business in the limited partnership’s name or have any power to sign documents for or otherwise bind the limited partnership. In addition, the general partner may only be removed by the limited partner(s) in the event the general partner fails to comply with the terms of the agreement and/or is negligent in performing its duties.

Huntington believes the general partner of each limited partnership has the power to direct the activities which most significantly affect the performance of each partnership, therefore, Huntington has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any LIHTC partnership. Huntington uses the equity or effective yield method to account for its investments in these entities. These investments are included in accrued income and other assets. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Huntington had gross investment commitments of $468.7 million (net of amortization: $328.1 million) and $532.1 million (net of amortization: $391.9 million), respectively, of which $352.6 million and $380.0 million, respectively, were funded. The unfunded portion is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, Huntington sold net LIHTC investments of $58.1 million resulting in a gain before tax of $7.6 million. The gain was included in other noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. There were not any sales of LIHTC investments during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012.

16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Commitments to extend credit

In the ordinary course of business, Huntington makes various commitments to extend credit that are not reflected in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The contractual amounts of these financial agreements at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, were as follows:

March 31, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Contract amount represents credit risk:

Commitments to extend credit

Commercial

$ 9,163,138 $ 9,209,094

Consumer

6,270,988 6,189,447

Commercial real estate

758,756 797,605

Standby letters-of-credit

478,801 514,705

Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates, are variable-rate, and contain clauses that permit Huntington to terminate or otherwise renegotiate the contracts in the event of a significant deterioration in the customer’s credit quality. These arrangements normally require the payment of a fee by the customer, the pricing of which is based on prevailing market conditions, credit quality, probability of funding, and other relevant factors. Since many of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contract amounts are not necessarily indicative of future cash requirements. The interest rate risk arising from these financial instruments is insignificant as a result of their predominantly short-term, variable-rate nature.

Standby letters-of-credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. Most of these arrangements mature within two years. The carrying amount of deferred revenue associated with these guarantees was $1.4 million and $1.4 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

119


Table of Contents

Through the Company’s credit process, Huntington monitors the credit risks of outstanding standby letters-of-credit. When it is probable that a standby letter-of-credit will be drawn and not repaid in full, losses are recognized in the provision for credit losses. At March 31, 2013, Huntington had $479 million of standby letters-of-credit outstanding, of which 81% were collateralized. Included in this $479 million total are letters-of-credit issued by the Bank that support securities that were issued by customers and remarketed by The Huntington Investment Company, the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary.

Huntington uses an internal grading system to assess an estimate of loss on its loan and lease portfolio. This same loan grading system is used to monitor credit risk associated with standby letters-of-credit. Under this grading system as of March 31, 2013, approximately $71 million of the standby letters-of-credit were rated strong with sufficient asset quality, liquidity, and good debt capacity and coverage; approximately $383 million were rated average with acceptable asset quality, liquidity, and modest debt capacity; and approximately $25 million were rated substandard with negative financial trends, structural weaknesses, operating difficulties, and higher leverage.

Commercial letters-of-credit represent short-term, self-liquidating instruments that facilitate customer trade transactions and generally have maturities of no longer than 90 days. The goods or cargo being traded normally secures these instruments.

Commitments to sell loans

Huntington enters into forward contracts relating to its mortgage banking business to hedge the exposures from commitments to make new residential mortgage loans with existing customers and from mortgage loans classified as loans held for sale. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Huntington had commitments to sell residential real estate loans of $737.3 million and $849.8 million, respectively. These contracts mature in less than one year.

Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, city, and foreign jurisdictions. Federal income tax audits have been completed through 2009. The Company has appealed certain proposed adjustments resulting from the IRS examination of the 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 tax returns. Management believes the tax positions taken related to such proposed adjustments were correct and supported by applicable statutes, regulations, and judicial authority, and intend to vigorously defend them. In 2011, Management entered into discussions with the Appeals Division of the IRS for the 2006 and 2007 tax returns. It is possible the ultimate resolution of the proposed adjustments, if unfavorable, may be material to the results of operations in the period it occurs. However, although no assurance can be given, Management believes the resolution of these examinations will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position. In the current quarter, the IRS began its examination of our 2010 and 2011 consolidated federal income tax returns. Various state and other jurisdictions remain open to examination for tax years 2006 and forward.

Huntington accounts for uncertainties in income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. At March 31, 2013, Huntington had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $6.2 million in income tax liability related to uncertain tax positions. Total interest accrued on the unrecognized tax benefits was $0.4 million as of March 31, 2013. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate of the tax liabilities. However, any ultimate settlement is not expected to be material to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as a whole. Huntington recognizes interest and penalties on income tax assessments or income tax refunds in the financial statements as a component of provision for income taxes. Huntington does not anticipate the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits to significantly change within the next 12 months.

Litigation

The nature of Huntington’s business ordinarily results in a certain amount of claims, litigation, investigations, and legal and administrative cases and proceedings, all of which are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. When the Company determines it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, it vigorously defends itself. The Company will consider settlement of cases when, in Management’s judgment, it is in the best interests of both the Company and its shareholders to do so.

On at least a quarterly basis, Huntington assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For matters where it is probable the Company will incur a loss and the amount can be reasonably estimated, Huntington establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is adjusted as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For matters where a loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.

120


Table of Contents

In certain cases, exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual to the extent such loss is reasonably possible, but not probable. Management believes an estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of amounts accrued, for current legal proceedings is from $0 to approximately $130.0 million at March 31, 2013. For certain other cases, Management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss at this time. Any estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants in several of the current proceedings whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the numerous unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, Management’s estimate will change from time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate.

While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, Management believes that the amount it has already accrued is adequate and any incremental liability arising from the Company’s legal proceedings will not have a material negative adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position as a whole. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position in a particular period.

The following supplements the discussion of certain matters previously reported in Item 3 (Legal Proceedings) of the 2012 Form 10-K for events occurring through the date of this filing:

The Bank is a defendant in three lawsuits, which collectively may be material, arising from its commercial lending, depository, and equipment leasing relationships with Cyberco Holdings, Inc. (Cyberco), based in Grand Rapids, Michigan. In November 2004, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the IRS raided the Cyberco facilities and Cyberco’s operations ceased. An equipment leasing fraud was uncovered, whereby Cyberco sought financing from equipment lessors and financial institutions, including the Bank, allegedly to purchase computer equipment from Teleservices Group, Inc. (Teleservices). Cyberco created fraudulent documentation to close the financing transactions while, in fact, no computer equipment was ever purchased or leased from Teleservices which proved to be a shell corporation.

On June 22, 2007, a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan (District Court) was filed by El Camino Resources, Ltd, ePlus Group, Inc., and Bank Midwest, N.A., all of whom had lending relationships with Cyberco, against the Bank, alleging that Cyberco defrauded plaintiffs and converted plaintiffs’ property through various means in connection with the equipment leasing scheme and alleges that the Bank aided and abetted Cyberco in committing the alleged fraud and conversion. The complaint further alleges that the Bank’s actions entitle one of the plaintiffs to recover $1.9 million from the Bank as a form of unjust enrichment. In addition, plaintiffs claimed direct damages of approximately $32.0 million and additional consequential damages in excess of $20.0 million. On July 1, 2010, the District Court issued an Opinion and Order adopting in full a federal magistrate’s recommendation for summary judgment in favor of the Bank on all claims except the unjust enrichment claim, and a partial summary judgment was entered on July 1, 2010. On February 6, 2012, the District Court dismissed the remaining count for unjust enrichment following a finding by the bankruptcy court that the plaintiff must pursue its rights, if any, with respect to that count in a bankruptcy court. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on March 2, 2012, appealing the District Court’s judgment against them on the aiding and abetting and conversion claims. Oral arguments before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals were held January 24, 2013, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s judgment in an opinion issued on April 8, 2013.

The Bank is also involved with the Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings of both Cyberco, filed on December 9, 2004, and Teleservices, filed on January 21, 2005. The Cyberco bankruptcy trustee commenced an adversary proceeding against the Bank on December 8, 2006, seeking over $70.0 million he alleges was transferred to the Bank. The Bank responded with a motion to dismiss and all but the preference claims were dismissed on January 29, 2008. The Cyberco bankruptcy trustee alleges preferential transfers in the amount of approximately $1.2 million. The Bankruptcy Court ordered the case to be tried in July 2012, and entered a pretrial order governing all pretrial conduct. The Bank filed a motion for summary judgment based on the Cyberco trustee seeking recovery in connection with the same alleged transfers as the Teleservices trustee in the case described below. The Bankruptcy Court granted the motion in principal part and the parties stipulated to a full dismissal which was entered on June 19, 2012.

The Teleservices bankruptcy trustee filed an adversary proceeding against the Bank on January 19, 2007, seeking to avoid and recover alleged transfers that occurred in two ways: (1) checks made payable to the Bank to be applied to Cyberco’s indebtedness to the Bank, and (2) deposits into Cyberco’s bank accounts with the Bank. A trial was held as to only the Bank’s defenses. Subsequently, the trustee filed a summary judgment motion on her affirmative case, alleging the fraudulent transfers to the Bank totaled approximately $73.0 million and seeking judgment in that amount (which includes the $1.2 million alleged to be preferential transfers by the Cyberco bankruptcy trustee). On March 17, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Opinion determining the alleged transfers made to the Bank were not received in good faith from the time period of April 30, 2004, through November 2004, and that the Bank had failed to show a lack of knowledge of the avoidability of the alleged transfers from September 2003, through April 30, 2004. The trustee then filed an amended motion for summary judgment on her affirmative case and a hearing was held on July 1, 2011.

121


Table of Contents

On March 30, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Opinion on the trustee’s motion determining the Bank was the initial transferee of the checks made payable to it and was a subsequent transferee of all deposits into Cyberco’s accounts. The Bankruptcy Court ruled Cyberco’s deposits were themselves transfers to the Bank under the Bankruptcy Code, and the Bank was liable for both the checks and the deposits, totaling approximately $73.0 million. The Bankruptcy Court ruled the Bank may be entitled to a credit of approximately $4.0 million for the Cyberco trustee’s recoveries in preference actions filed against third parties that received payments from Cyberco within 90 days preceding Cyberco’s bankruptcy. Lastly, the Bankruptcy Court ruled that it will award prejudgment interest to the Teleservices trustee at a rate to be determined. A trial was held on these remaining issues on April 30, 2012, and the Court gave a bench opinion on July 23, 2012. In that opinion, the Court denied the Bank the $4.0 million credit, but ruled approximately $0.9 million in deposits were either double-counted or were outside the timeframe in which the Teleservices trustee can recover. Therefore, the Bankruptcy Court’s recommended award will be reduced by this $0.9 million. Further, the Bankruptcy Court ruled the interest rate specified in the federal statute governing post-judgment interest, which is based on treasury bill rates, will be the rate of interest for determining prejudgment interest. The rulings of the Bankruptcy Court in its March 2011 and March 2012 opinions, as well as its July 23, 2012, bench opinion, will not be reduced to judgment by the Bankruptcy Court. Rather, the Bankruptcy Court has delivered a report and recommendation to the District Court for the Western District of Michigan, recommending a judgment be entered in the principal amount of $71.8 million, plus interest through July 27, 2012, in the amount of $8.8 million. The District Court is conducting a de novo review of the fact findings and legal conclusions in the Bankruptcy Court’s opinions.

In the pending bankruptcy cases of Cyberco and Teleservices, the Bank moved to substantively consolidate the two bankruptcy estates, principally on the ground that Teleservices was the alter ego and a mere instrumentality of Cyberco at all times. On July 2, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Opinion denying the Bank’s motions for substantive consolidation of the two bankruptcy estates. The Bank has appealed this ruling and the appeal is pending.

On January 17, 2012, the Company was named a defendant in a putative class action filed on behalf of all 88 counties in Ohio against MERSCORP, Inc. and numerous other financial institutions that participate in the mortgage electronic registration system (MERS). The complaint alleges that recording of mortgages and assignments thereof is mandatory under Ohio law and seeks a declaratory judgment that the defendants are required to record every mortgage and assignment on real property located in Ohio and pay the attendant statutory recording fees. The complaint also seeks damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. Although Huntington has not been named as a defendant in the other cases, similar litigation has been initiated against MERSCORP, Inc. and other financial institutions in other jurisdictions throughout the country.

17. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The parent company condensed financial statements, which include transactions with subsidiaries, are as follows:

Balance Sheets

March 31, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 964,693 $ 921,471

Due from The Huntington National Bank

108,115 207,414

Due from non-bank subsidiaries

71,502 78,006

Investment in The Huntington National Bank

4,902,675 4,754,886

Investment in non-bank subsidiaries

785,630 774,055

Accrued interest receivable and other assets

153,970 131,358

Total assets

$ 6,986,585 $ 6,867,190

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Short-term borrowings

$ $

Long-term borrowings

709,211 662,894

Dividends payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities

410,236 414,085

Total liabilities

1,119,447 1,076,979

Shareholders’ equity (1)

5,867,138 5,790,211

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 6,986,585 $ 6,867,190

(1) See Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity.

122


Table of Contents
Three Months Ended

Statements of Income

March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Income

Dividends from

The Huntington National Bank

$ $

Non-bank subsidiaries

8,450

Interest from

The Huntington National Bank

4,152 12,886

Non-bank subsidiaries

821 1,633

Other

396 413

Total income

5,369 23,382

Expense

Personnel costs

13,413 9,713

Interest on borrowings

6,117 9,179

Other

5,064 7,579

Total expense

24,594 26,471

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

(19,225 ) (3,089 )

Income taxes (benefit)

(7,852 ) (11,092 )

Income (loss) before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

(11,373 ) 8,003

Increase in undistributed net income of:

The Huntington National Bank

155,636 142,424

Non-bank subsidiaries

7,517 2,843

Net income

$ 151,780 $ 153,270

Other comprehensive income (loss) (1)

(9,138 ) 15,947

Comprehensive income

$ 142,642 $ 169,217

(1)

See Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for other comprehensive income (loss) detail.

123


Table of Contents
Three Months Ended

Statements of Cash Flows

March 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Operating activities

Net income

$ 151,780 $ 153,270

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

(167,048 ) (157,910 )

Depreciation and amortization

70 63

Other, net

20,857 (4,600 )

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

5,659 (9,177 )

Investing activities

Repayments from subsidiaries

112,469 114,793

Advances to subsidiaries

(1,250 ) (8,043 )

Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities

111,219 106,750

Financing activities

Dividends paid on stock

(41,656 ) (42,351 )

Repurchases of common stock

(33,600 )

Other, net

1,600 216

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

(73,656 ) (42,135 )

Change in cash and cash equivalents

43,222 55,438

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

921,471 917,954

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 964,693 $ 973,392

Supplemental disclosure:

Interest paid

$ 6,117 $ 9,179

18. SEGMENT REPORTING

We have four major business segments: Retail and Business Banking, Regional and Commercial Banking, Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate, and Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending. A Treasury / Other function includes our insurance business and other unallocated assets, liabilities, revenue, and expense.

Segment results are determined based upon the Company’s management reporting system, which assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each of the business segments. The process is designed around the Company’s organizational and management structure and, accordingly, the results derived are not necessarily comparable with similar information published by other financial institutions. A description of each segment and table of financial results is presented below.

Retail and Business Banking : The Retail and Business Banking segment provides a wide array of financial products and services to consumer and small business customers including but not limited to checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit, consumer loans, and small business loans and leases. Other financial services available to consumer and small business customers include investments, insurance services, interest rate risk protection products, foreign exchange hedging, and treasury management services. Huntington serves customers primarily through our network of traditional branches in Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Indiana, West Virginia, and Kentucky. Huntington also has branches located in grocery stores in Ohio and Michigan. In addition to our extensive branch network, customers can access Huntington through online banking, mobile banking, telephone banking, and over 1,400 ATMs.

Huntington established a “Fair Play” banking philosophy and built a reputation for meeting the banking needs of consumers in a manner which makes them feel supported and appreciated. Huntington believes customers are recognizing this and other efforts as key differentiators and it is earning us more customers and deeper relationships.

Business Banking is a dynamic and growing part of our business and we are committed to being the bank of choice for small businesses in our markets. Business Banking is defined as companies with revenues up to $25 million and consists of approximately 163,000 businesses. Huntington continues to develop products and services that are designed specifically to meet the needs of small business. Huntington continues to look for ways to help companies find solutions to their capital needs.

124


Table of Contents

Regional and Commercial Banking: This segment provides a wide array of products and services to the middle market and large corporate customers base located primarily within our eleven regional commercial banking markets. Products and services are delivered through a relationship banking model and include commercial lending, as well as depository and liquidity management products. Dedicated teams collaborate with our relationship bankers to deliver complex and customized treasury management solutions, equipment and technology leasing, international services, capital markets services such as interest rate risk protection products, foreign exchange hedging and sales, trading of securities, mezzanine investment capabilities, and employee benefit programs (insurance, 401(k)). The Commercial Banking team specializes in serving a number of industry segments such as not-for-profit organizations, health-care entities, and large publicly traded companies.

Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate : This segment provides lending and other banking products and services to customers outside of our normal retail and commercial banking segments. Our products and services include financing for the purchase of automobiles by customers at automotive dealerships, financing the acquisition of new and used vehicle inventory of automotive dealerships, and financing for land, buildings, and other commercial real estate owned or constructed by real estate developers, automobile dealerships, or other customers with real estate project financing needs. Products and services are delivered through highly specialized relationship-focused bankers and product partners. Huntington creates well-defined relationship plans which identify needs where solutions are developed and customer commitments are obtained.

The Automotive Finance team services automobile dealerships, its owners, and consumers buying automobiles through these dealerships. Huntington has provided new and used automobile financing and dealer services throughout the Midwest since the early 1950s. This consistency in the market and our focus on working with strong dealerships, has allowed us to expand into selected markets outside of the Midwest and to actively deepen relationships while building a strong reputation.

The Commercial Real Estate team serves real estate developers, REITs, and other customers with lending needs that are secured by commercial properties. Most of our customers are located within our footprint.

Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending: This segment consists of our wealth management, government banking, and home lending businesses. In wealth management, Huntington provides financial services to high net worth clients in our primary banking markets and Florida. Huntington provides these services through a unified sales team, which consists of private bankers, trust officers, and investment advisors. Aligned with the eleven regional commercial banking markets, this coordinated service model delivers products and services directly and through the other segment product partners. A fundamental point of differentiation is our commitment to be in the market, working closely with clients and their other advisors to identify needs, offer solutions and provide ongoing advice in an optimal client experience.

The Government Finance Group provides financial products and services to government and other public sector entities in our primary banking markets. A locally based team of relationship managers works with clients to meet their trust, lending, and treasury management needs.

Home Lending originates and services consumer loans and mortgages for customers who are generally located in our primary banking markets. Consumer and mortgage lending products are primarily distributed through the Retail and Business Banking segment, as well as through commissioned loan originators. Closely aligned, our Community Development group serves an important role as it focuses on delivering on our commitment to the communities Huntington serves.

The segment also includes the related businesses of investment management, investment servicing, custody, corporate trust, and retirement plan services. Huntington Asset Advisors provides investment management services through a variety of internal and external channels, including advising the Huntington Funds, our proprietary family of mutual funds and Huntington Strategy Shares, our actively-managed exchange-traded funds. Huntington Asset Services offers administrative and operational support to fund complexes, including fund accounting, transfer agency, administration, and distribution services. Our retirement plan services business offers fully bundled and third party distribution of a variety of qualified and non-qualified plan solutions.

Treasury / Other function includes our insurance brokerage business, which specializes in commercial property and casualty, employee benefits, personal lines, life and disability and specialty lines of insurance. Huntington also provides brokerage and agency services for residential and commercial title insurance and excess and surplus product lines of insurance. As an agent and broker we do not assume underwriting risks; instead we provide our customers with quality, noninvestment insurance contracts. The Treasury / Other function also includes technology and operations, other unallocated assets, liabilities, revenue, and expense.

125


Table of Contents

Listed below is certain operating basis financial information reconciled to Huntington’s March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and March 31, 2012, reported results by business segment:

Three Months Ended March 31,
Income Statements Retail &
Business
Regional &
Commercial
Treasury/ Huntington

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Banking Banking AFCRE WGH Other Consolidated

2013

Net interest income

$ 205,240 69,399 88,070 43,668 17,793 $ 424,170

Provision for credit losses

32,547 (7,243 ) (7,504 ) 11,792 29,592

Noninterest income

87,266 30,302 8,355 94,654 31,632 252,209

Noninterest expense

239,766 52,415 36,911 91,992 21,709 442,793

Income taxes

7,068 19,085 23,456 12,088 (9,483 ) 52,214

Net income

$ 13,125 $ 35,444 $ 43,562 $ 22,450 $ 37,199 $ 151,780

2012

Net interest income

$ 221,301 64,202 90,330 46,829 (5,453 ) $ 417,209

Provision for credit losses

48,839 13,280 (42,254 ) 14,541 34,406

Noninterest income

89,256 31,933 34,719 87,638 41,774 285,320

Noninterest expense

234,861 45,867 38,839 90,917 52,192 462,676

Income taxes

9,400 12,946 44,962 10,153 (25,284 ) 52,177

Net income

$ 17,457 $ 24,042 $ 83,502 $ 18,856 $ 9,413 $ 153,270

Assets at Deposits at
March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Retail & Business Banking

$ 14,474,672 $ 14,362,630 $ 28,719,332 $ 28,367,264

Regional & Commercial Banking

11,978,858 11,540,966 5,626,852 5,862,858

AFCRE

12,235,143 12,085,128 969,707 995,035

WGH

7,477,667 7,570,256 10,015,400 9,507,785

Treasury / Other

9,888,626 10,594,205 1,535,850 1,519,741

Total

$ 56,054,966 $ 56,153,185 $ 46,867,141 $ 46,252,683

19. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

On March 30, 2012, Huntington acquired the loans, deposits and certain other assets and liabilities of Fidelity Bank located in Dearborn, Michigan from the FDIC. Under the agreement, approximately $523.9 million of loans, a receivable of $95.9 million from the FDIC, and $152.3 million of other assets (primarily cash and due from banks and investment securities) were transferred to Huntington. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations”. The fair values for loans were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms (Level 3). This value was reduced by an estimate of probable losses and the credit risk associated with the loans. The fair values of deposits were estimated by discounting cash flows using interest rates currently being offered on deposits with similar maturities (Level 3). Additionally, approximately $713.4 million of deposits and $45.2 million of other borrowings were assumed. Huntington recognized an $11.2 million bargain purchase gain during 2012, which is included in other noninterest income.

126


Table of Contents

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures for the current period can be found in the Market Risk section of this report, which includes changes in market risk exposures from disclosures presented in Huntington’s 2012 Form 10-K.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Huntington maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Huntington’s Management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of Huntington’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon such evaluation, Huntington’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, Huntington’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There have not been any significant changes in Huntington’s internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Huntington’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

In accordance with the instructions to Part II, the other specified items in this part have been omitted because they are not applicable or the information has been previously reported.

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

Information required by this item is set forth in Note 16 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

Information required by this item is set forth in Part 1 Item 2- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) and (b)

Not Applicable

(c)

Period

Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs (1)
Maximum Number of Shares (or
Approximate Dollar Value) that
May Yet Be Purchased Under the

Plans or Programs (2)

January 1, 2013 to January 31, 2013

932,100 $ 6.97 24,259,969 $ 27,083,085

February 1, 2013 to February 28, 2013

2,682,944 6.98 26,942,913 8,357,364

March 1, 2013 to March 31, 2013

1,123,385 7.38 28,066,298 70,621

Total

4,738,429 $ 7.07 28,066,298 $ 70,621

(1) The reported shares were repurchased pursuant to Huntington’s publicly announced stock repurchase authorizations.
(2) The number shown represents, as of the end of each period, the maximum number of shares (approximate dollar value) of Common Stock that may yet be purchased under publicly announced stock repurchase authorizations. The shares may be purchased, from time-to-time, depending on market conditions.

127


Table of Contents

On March 14, 2013, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated was notified by the Federal Reserve that it had no objection to Huntington’s proposed capital actions included in Huntington’s capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve in January of this year. These actions included the potential repurchase of up to $227 million shares of common stock, starting in the second quarter of 2013 through the first quarter of 2014. Huntington’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program consistent with Huntington’s capital plan. During the 2013 first quarter, Huntington repurchased a total of 4.7 million shares at a weighted average share price of $7.07.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Index

This report incorporates by reference the documents listed below that we have previously filed with the SEC. The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference information in this document. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this document, except for any information that is superseded by information that is included directly in this document.

This information may be read and copied at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The SEC also maintains an Internet web site that contains reports, proxy statements, and other information about issuers, like us, who file electronically with the SEC. The address of the site is http://www.sec.gov . The reports and other information filed by us with the SEC are also available at our Internet web site. The address of the site is http://www.huntington.com . Except as specifically incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, information on those web sites is not part of this report. You also should be able to inspect reports, proxy statements, and other information about us at the offices of the NASDAQ National Market at 33 Whitehall Street, New York, New York.

Exhibit
Number
Document Description Report or Registration Statement SEC File or
Registration
Number
Exhibit
Reference
3.1 Articles of Restatement of Charter. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993. 000-02525 3 (i)
3.2 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Restatement of Charter. Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2007 000-02525 3.1
3.3 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Restatement of Charter. Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 7, 2008 000-02525 3.1
3.4 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Restatement of Charter. Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 27, 2010 001-34073 3.1
3.5 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of April 22, 2008. Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 22, 2008 000-02525 3.1
3.6 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of April 22. 2008. Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 22, 2008 000-02525 3.2
3.7 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of November 12, 2008. Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 12, 2008 001-34073 3.1
3.8 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of December 31, 2006. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 000-02525 3.4
3.9 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of December 28, 2011. Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 28, 2011. 001-34073 3.1
3.10 Bylaws of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as amended and restated, as of July 18, 2012. Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2012. 001-34073 3.1
4.1 Instruments defining the Rights of Security Holders—reference is made to Articles Fifth, Eighth, and Tenth of Articles of Restatement of Charter, as amended and supplemented. Instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
12.1 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
12.2 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.

128


Table of Contents
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – Chief Executive Officer.
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – Chief Financial Officer.
32.1 Section 1350 Certification – Chief Executive Officer.
32.2 Section 1350 Certification – Chief Financial Officer.
101** The following material from Huntington’s Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (1) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (3) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (4) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (5) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (6) the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
** Furnished, not filed.

129


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

(Registrant)

Date: April 29, 2013

/s/ Stephen D. Steinour

Stephen D. Steinour
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: April 29, 2013

/s/ Donald R. Kimble

Donald R. Kimble
Sr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

130

TABLE OF CONTENTS