HBAN 10-Q Quarterly Report June 30, 2013 | Alphaminr
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC/MD

HBAN 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2013

HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC/MD
10-Qs and 10-Ks
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K
Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009
PROXIES
DEF 14A
Filed on March 6, 2025
DEF 14A
Filed on March 7, 2024
DEF 14A
Filed on March 9, 2023
DEF 14A
Filed on March 10, 2022
DEF 14A
Filed on March 12, 2021
DEF 14A
Filed on March 12, 2020
DEF 14A
Filed on March 7, 2019
DEF 14A
Filed on March 8, 2018
DEF 14A
Filed on March 9, 2017
DEF 14A
Filed on March 10, 2016
DEF 14A
Filed on March 12, 2015
DEF 14A
Filed on March 6, 2014
DEF 14A
Filed on March 7, 2013
DEF 14A
Filed on March 8, 2012
DEF 14A
Filed on March 9, 2011
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 26, 2010
10-Q 1 d573781d10q.htm FORM 10-Q FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 2013

Commission File Number 1-34073

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Maryland 31-0724920

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

41 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43287

Registrant’s telephone number (614) 480-8300

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

There were 829,674,914 shares of Registrant’s common stock ($0.01 par value) outstanding on June 30, 2013.


Table of Contents

HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

66

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

67

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

68

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

69

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

70

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

71

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Overview

6

Discussion of Results of Operations

9

Risk Management and Capital:

Credit Risk

25

Market Risk

40

Liquidity Risk

42

Operational Risk

46

Compliance Risk

47

Capital

47

Fair Value

50

Business Segment Discussion

52

Additional Disclosures

64

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

144

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

144

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

144

Item 1A. Risk Factors

144

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

144

Item 6. Exhibits

145

Signatures

146

2


Table of Contents

Glossary of Acronyms and Terms

The following listing provides a comprehensive reference of common acronyms and terms used throughout the document:

2012 Form 10-K Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012
ABL Asset Based Lending
ACL Allowance for Credit Losses
AFCRE Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate
ABS Asset-Backed Securities
AFS Available-for-Sale
ALCO Asset & Liability Management Committee
ALLL Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
ARM Adjustable Rate Mortgage
ASC Accounting Standards Codification
ASU Accounting Standards Update
ATM Automated Teller Machine
AULC Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments
AVM Automated Valuation Methodology
C&I Commercial and Industrial
CapPR Capital Plan Review
CCAR Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
CDO Collateralized Debt Obligations
CDs Certificates of Deposit
CFPB Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
CMO Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
CRE Commercial Real Estate
Dodd-Frank Act Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
EPS Earnings Per Share
EVE Economic Value of Equity
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHA Federal Housing Administration
FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FICA Federal Insurance Contributions Act
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association
FRB Federal Reserve Bank
FTE Fully-Taxable Equivalent
FTP Funds Transfer Pricing
GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
HAMP Home Affordable Modification Program
HARP Home Affordable Refinance Program
HTM Held-to-Maturity
IRS Internal Revenue Service
ISE Interest Sensitive Earnings
LCR Liquidity Coverage Ratio

3


Table of Contents
LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate
LGD Loss-Given-Default
LTV Loan to Value
MBS Mortgage-Backed Security
MD&A Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area
MSR Mortgage Servicing Rights
NALs Nonaccrual Loans
NCO Net Charge-off
NIM Net interest margin
NPAs Nonperforming Assets
NPR Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
N.R. Not relevant. Denominator of calculation is a gain in the current period compared with a loss in the prior period, or vice-versa.
OCC Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OCI Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
OCR Optimal Customer Relationship
OLEM Other Loans Especially Mentioned
OREO Other Real Estate Owned
OTTI Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
PD Probability-Of-Default
Plan Huntington Bancshares Retirement Plan
Problem Loans Includes nonaccrual loans and leases (Table 18), troubled debt restructured loans (Table 19), accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more (aging analysis section of Footnote 3), and Criticized commercial loans (credit quality indicators section of Footnote 3).
REIT Real Estate Investment Trust
ROC Risk Oversight Committee
SAD Special Assets Division
SBA Small Business Administration
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
SERP Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
SRIP Supplemental Retirement Income Plan
TDR Troubled Debt Restructured Loan
U.S. Treasury U.S. Department of the Treasury
UCS Uniform Classification System
UPB Unpaid Principal Balance
USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture
VA U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs
VIE Variable Interest Entity
WGH Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending

4


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

When we refer to “we,” “our,” and “us” in this report, we mean Huntington Bancshares Incorporated and our consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates that we refer only to the parent company, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated. When we refer to the “Bank” in this report, we mean our only bank subsidiary, The Huntington National Bank, and its subsidiaries.

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

INTRODUCTION

We are a multi-state diversified regional bank holding company organized under Maryland law in 1966 and headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Through the Bank, we have 147 years of servicing the financial needs of our customers. Through our subsidiaries, we provide full-service commercial and consumer banking services, mortgage banking services, automobile financing, equipment leasing, investment management, trust services, brokerage services, customized insurance service programs, and other financial products and services. Our over 700 banking offices are located in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Selected financial services and other activities are also conducted in various other states. International banking services are available through the headquarters office in Columbus, Ohio and a limited purpose office located in the Cayman Islands and another limited purpose office located in Hong Kong. Our foreign banking activities, in total or with any individual country, are not significant.

This MD&A provides information we believe necessary for understanding our financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. The MD&A included in our 2012 Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with this MD&A as this discussion provides only material updates to the 2012 Form 10-K. This MD&A should also be read in conjunction with the financial statements, notes and other information contained in this report.

Our discussion is divided into key segments:

Executive Overview —Provides a summary of our current financial performance and business overview, including our thoughts on the impact of the economy, legislative and regulatory initiatives, and recent industry developments. This section also provides our outlook regarding our expectations for the remainder of 2013.

Discussion of Results of Operations —Reviews financial performance from a consolidated Company perspective. It also includes a Significant Items section that summarizes key issues helpful for understanding performance trends. Key consolidated average balance sheet and income statement trends are also discussed in this section.

Risk Management and Capital —Discusses credit, market, liquidity, operational, and compliance risks, including how these are managed, as well as performance trends. It also includes a discussion of liquidity policies, how we obtain funding, and related performance. In addition, there is a discussion of guarantees and / or commitments made for items such as standby letters of credit and commitments to sell loans, and a discussion that reviews the adequacy of capital, including regulatory capital requirements.

Business Segment Discussion —Provides an overview of financial performance for each of our major business segments and provides additional discussion of trends underlying consolidated financial performance.

Additional Disclosures —Provides comments on important matters including forward-looking statements, critical accounting policies and use of significant estimates, recent accounting pronouncements and developments, and acquisitions.

A reading of each section is important to understand fully the nature of our financial performance and prospects.

5


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Summary of 2013 Second Quarter Results

For the quarter, we reported net income of $150.7 million, or $0.17 per common share, compared with $151.8 million, or $0.17 per common share, in the prior quarter ( see Table 1 ).

Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income was $431.5 million for the quarter, down $1.4 million, or less than 1%, from the prior quarter. The decrease reflected a 4 basis point decrease in the net interest margin, partially offset by a $0.2 billion increase in average earnings assets as well as an additional day in the quarter. The primary items affecting the net interest margin were a 7 basis point negative impact from the mix and yield of earning assets, which was partially offset by a 3 basis point positive impact from the mix and cost of deposits.

The provision for credit losses decreased $4.9 million, or 16%, from the prior quarter. This reflected a $16.9 million, or 33%, decrease in NCOs to $34.8 million, or an annualized 0.34% of average total loans and leases, from $51.7 million, or an annualized 0.51%, in the prior quarter.

Noninterest income decreased $3.6 million, or 1%, from the prior quarter. The decrease in noninterest income reflected the $11.6 million, or 26%, decrease in mortgage banking income as the benefit of net mortgage servicing rights decreased by $11.6 million. Other income decreased $7.9 million, or 24%, as the prior quarter included a $7.6 million gain on the sale of Low Income Housing Tax Credit investments. These were partially offset by a $7.1 million, or 12%, increase in service charges on deposit accounts that follow yearly seasonal trends in customer activity, an 8% annualized growth in consumer checking households, and a $4.4 million, or 56%, increase in capital markets activity.

Noninterest expense increased $3.1 million, or 1%, from the prior quarter due to a $5.0 million, or 2%, increase in personnel costs, reflecting higher commission expense and a $3.3 million, or 30%, seasonal increase in marketing. These were partially offset by a $2.9 million decline in OREO and foreclosure expense.

The period-end ACL as a percentage of total loans and leases decreased to 1.86% from 1.91% in the prior quarter. The ACL as a percentage of period-end NALs increased 7 percentage points to 214%. NALs declined by $16.8 million, or 4%, to $363.5 million, or 0.87% of total loans. The decreases primarily reflected meaningful improvement in commercial real estate NALs.

The tangible common equity to tangible asset ratio decreased to 8.78% from 8.92% in the prior quarter, resulting primarily from net unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities and cash flow hedging derivatives during the quarter, partially offset by retained earnings. Our Tier 1 common risk-based capital ratio at quarter end was 10.71%, up from 10.62% in the prior quarter. The regulatory Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio at June 30, 2013 was 12.24%, up from 12.16%, at March 31, 2013. All capital ratios were impacted by the repurchase of 10.0 million common shares over the quarter at an average price per share of $7.50.

Business Overview

General

Our general business objectives are: (1) grow net interest income and fee income, (2) increase cross-sell and share-of-wallet across all business segments, (3) improve efficiency ratio, (4) continue to strengthen risk management, including sustained improvement in credit metrics, and (5) maintain strong capital and liquidity positions.

During the 2013 second quarter, we continued to demonstrate progress in our strategic priorities. We returned to pre-recession, normal credit levels, reflecting our disciplined and prudent lending approach and also continued to experience double-digit household growth. Expenses were managed to levels slightly below our expectations. Revenue was relatively unchanged as strategic growth overcame multiple environmental headwinds and the prior quarters’ gains from the sale of Low Income Housing Tax Credit investments. We remain on track to deliver sustainable levels of long-term profitability. Existing strategic investments continue to mature and we are focused on expense management and a more robust continuous improvement effort across the enterprise.

Economy

Consumer lending and deposits increased over the same quarter last year as consumer confidence in the recovery rises. Our commercial loan pipeline continues to be strong as business owners are seeing more signs of economic growth. Employment across our Midwest markets continues to improve with Ohio creating the largest month-to-month employment increase in the nation in May and Michigan coming in third.

6


Table of Contents

Legislative and Regulatory

Regulatory reforms continue to be released, which impose additional restrictions on current business practices. Recent items affecting us include the Federal Reserve’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and the recently issued final Basel III rule.

Capital Plans Rule / Supervisory and Company-Run Stress Test Requirements – During 2012, we participated in the Federal Reserve’s Capital Plan Review (CapPR) process and made our capital plan submission in January 2013. On March 14, 2013, we announced that the Federal Reserve had completed its review of our capital plan submission and did not object to our proposed capital actions. The capital plan review process included reviews of our internal capital planning process and our plans to make capital distributions, such as dividend payments or stock repurchases, as well as a stress test requirement designed to test our capital adequacy throughout times of economic and financial stress.

Beginning with our Capital Plan submission in January 2014, we will be subject to the Federal Reserve’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process. One of the primary additional elements of CCAR will be supervisory stress tests conducted by the Federal Reserve under different hypothetical macro-economic scenarios in addition to the stress tests routinely conducted by management. After completing its review, the Federal Reserve may object or not object to our proposed capital actions, such as plans to pay or increase common stock dividends or increase common stock repurchase programs. Beginning with our January 2014 submission, we will be subject to the OCC’s Annual Stress Test at the bank-level. The OCC stipulated that it will consult closely with the Federal Reserve to provide common stress scenarios which can be used at both the depository institution and bank holding company levels.

Basel III Capital rules for U.S. banking organizations – On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve voted to adopt final Basel III capital rules for U.S. banking organizations. The final rules establish an integrated regulatory capital framework and will implement in the United States the Basel III regulatory capital reforms from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. Under the final rule, minimum requirements will increase for both the quantity and quality of capital held by banking organizations. Consistent with the international Basel framework, the final rule includes a new minimum ratio of common equity tier 1 capital (Tier I Common) to risk-weighted assets and a common equity tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets that will apply to all supervised financial institutions. The rule also raises the minimum ratio of tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and includes a minimum leverage ratio of 4% for all banking organizations. These new minimum capital ratios will become effective for us on January 1, 2015 and will be fully phased-in on January 1, 2019.

Following the Basel III regulatory capital levels that we must satisfy to avoid limitations on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments during the applicable transition period, from January 1, 2015 until January 1, 2019.

Basel III Regulatory Capital Levels
January 1, January 1, January 1, January 1, January 1,
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Tier 1 common equity

4.5 % 5.125 % 5.75 % 6.375 % 7.0 %

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio

6.0 % 6.625 % 7.25 % 7.875 % 8.5 %

Total risk-based capital ratio

8.0 % 8.625 % 9.25 % 9.875 % 10.5 %

The final rule emphasizes common equity tier 1 capital, the most loss-absorbing form of capital, and implements strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments. The final rule also improves the methodology for calculating risk-weighted assets to enhance risk sensitivity. Banks and regulators use risk weighting to assign different levels of risk to different classes of assets.

We have evaluated the impact of the Basel III final rule on our regulatory capital ratios and estimate a reduction of approximately 60 basis points to our Basel I Tier I Common risk-based capital ratio based on our June 30, 2013 balance sheet composition. The estimate is based on management’s current interpretation, expectations, and understanding of the final U.S. Basel III rules. We anticipate that our capital ratios, on a Basel III basis, will continue to exceed the well capitalized minimum capital requirements. We are evaluating options to mitigate the capital impact of the final rule prior to its effective implementation date.

Expectations

We are seeing an uptick in manufacturing across our markets led by the auto industry along with continued investments in the local oil and gas exploration industry. We believe these developments, along with recent upward revisions to economic growth forecasts in 2014, will trigger further business investment. We also are seeing a stronger than expected housing recovery across much of our region. We believe this, along with an increase in consumer confidence, will lead to more consumer spending. We will remain disciplined as we manage our returns on an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile.

Net interest income is expected to modestly grow over the remainder of 2013. We anticipate an increase in total loans will be partially offset by a reduction in total securities, as the portfolio’s cash flow is not reinvested into additional securities. However, those benefits to net interest income are expected to be mostly offset by continued downward NIM pressure. NIM for 2013 is not expected to fall below the mid 3.30%s due to continued deposit repricing and mix shift opportunities while maintaining a disciplined approach to loan pricing.

7


Table of Contents

The C&I portfolio is expected to see growth consistent with the anticipated increase in customer activity. Our C&I loan pipeline remains robust with much of this reflecting the positive impact from our investments in specialized commercial verticals, focused OCR sales process, and continued support of middle market and small business lending. Given automobile loan yields are relatively more attractive than similar duration securities and the recent decline in estimated securitization gains, we currently do not anticipate any automobile securitizations in the second half of 2013. Residential mortgages and home equity loan balances are expected to increase modestly. CRE loans are expected to remain in the current $5 billion range.

We anticipate the increase in total loans will outpace growth in total deposits. This reflects our continued focus on the overall cost of funds, as well as the continued shift towards low- and no-cost demand deposits and money market deposit accounts.

Noninterest income, when compared with 2012 levels, is expected to be flat to slightly down, excluding the impact of any automobile loan sales and any net MSR impact. The anticipated slowdown in mortgage banking activity is expected to be mostly offset by continued growth in new customers, increased contribution from higher cross-sell, and the continued maturation of our previous strategic investments.

Effective December 31, 2013, the benefits earned in the Company’s pension plan will be frozen, as approved by the board of directors on July 17, 2013. As a result of the accounting treatment for the unamortized prior service pension cost and the change in the projected benefit obligation related to the curtailment, a one-time non-cash pre-tax gain of approximately $35 million, or $0.03 per share, is expected to be recognized in the 2013 third quarter.

Third quarter expenses are expected to modestly increase due to higher commission expense and higher occupancy and equipment expense related to our continued in-store expansion. Expenses will be consistent with previous expectations, with a modest downward bias related to the pension related expense and excluding the aforementioned one-time gain. We continue to evaluate additional cost saving opportunities and remain committed to posting positive operating leverage in 2013.

NPAs are expected to experience continued improvement. This quarter, NCOs were slightly below our expected normalized range of 35 to 55 basis points. The level of provision for credit losses was below our long-term expectation, and we continue to expect moderate quarterly volatility.

The effective tax rate for 2013 is expected to be in the range of 25% to 28%, primarily reflecting the impacts of tax-exempt income, tax advantaged investments, and general business credits.

8


Table of Contents

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This section provides a review of financial performance from a consolidated perspective. It also includes a “Significant Items” section that summarizes key issues important for a complete understanding of performance trends. Key Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Unaudited Condensed Statement of Income trends are discussed. All earnings per share data are reported on a diluted basis. For additional insight on financial performance, please read this section in conjunction with the “Business Segment Discussion.”

9


Table of Contents

Table 1—Selected Quarterly Income Statement Data (1)

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

Second First Fourth Third Second

Interest income

$ 462,582 $ 465,319 $ 478,995 $ 483,787 $ 487,544

Interest expense

37,645 41,149 44,940 53,489 58,582

Net interest income

424,937 424,170 434,055 430,298 428,962

Provision for credit losses

24,722 29,592 39,458 37,004 36,520

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

400,215 394,578 394,597 393,294 392,442

Service charges on deposit accounts

68,009 60,883 68,083 67,806 65,998

Mortgage banking income

33,659 45,248 61,711 44,614 38,349

Trust services

30,666 31,160 31,388 29,689 29,914

Electronic banking

23,345 20,713 21,011 22,135 20,514

Brokerage income

19,546 17,995 17,415 16,526 19,025

Insurance income

17,187 19,252 17,268 17,792 17,384

Gain on sale of loans

3,348 2,616 20,690 6,591 4,131

Bank owned life insurance income

15,421 13,442 13,767 14,371 13,967

Capital markets fees

12,229 7,834 12,694 11,596 13,260

Securities gains (losses)

(410 ) (509 ) 863 4,169 350

Other income

25,655 33,575 32,761 25,778 30,927

Total noninterest income

248,655 252,209 297,651 261,067 253,819

Personnel costs

263,862 258,895 253,952 247,709 243,034

Outside data processing and other services

49,898 49,265 48,699 50,396 48,568

Net occupancy

27,656 30,114 29,008 27,599 25,474

Equipment

24,947 24,880 26,580 25,950 24,872

Deposit and other insurance expense

13,460 15,490 16,327 15,534 15,731

Professional services

9,341 7,192 22,514 17,510 15,037

Marketing

14,239 10,971 16,456 16,842 17,396

Amortization of intangibles

10,362 10,320 11,647 11,431 11,940

OREO and foreclosure expense

(271 ) 2,666 4,233 4,982 4,106

Loss (Gain) on early extinguishment of debt

1,782 (2,580 )

Other expense

32,371 33,000 41,212 38,568 40,691

Total noninterest expense

445,865 442,793 470,628 458,303 444,269

Income before income taxes

203,005 203,994 221,620 196,058 201,992

Provision for income taxes

52,354 52,214 54,341 28,291 49,286

Net income

$ 150,651 $ 151,780 $ 167,279 $ 167,767 $ 152,706

Dividends on preferred shares

7,967 7,970 7,973 7,983 7,984

Net income applicable to common shares

$ 142,684 $ 143,810 $ 159,306 $ 159,784 $ 144,722

Average common shares—basic

834,730 841,103 847,220 857,871 862,261

Average common shares—diluted

843,840 848,708 853,306 863,588 867,551

Net income per common share—basic

$ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.19 $ 0.19 $ 0.17

Net income per common share—diluted

0.17 0.17 0.19 0.19 0.17

Cash dividends declared per common share

0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04

Return on average total assets

1.08 % 1.10 % 1.19 % 1.19 % 1.10 %

Return on average common shareholders’ equity

10.4 10.7 11.6 11.9 11.1

Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (2)

12.0 12.4 13.5 13.9 13.1

Net interest margin (3)

3.38 3.42 3.45 3.38 3.42

Efficiency ratio (4)

64.0 63.3 62.3 64.5 62.8

Effective tax rate

25.8 25.6 24.5 14.4 24.4

Revenue—FTE

Net interest income

$ 424,937 $ 424,170 $ 434,055 $ 430,298 $ 428,962

FTE adjustment

6,587 5,923 5,470 5,254 5,747

Net interest income (3)

431,524 430,093 439,525 435,552 434,709

Noninterest income

248,655 252,209 297,651 261,067 253,819

Total revenue (3)

$ 680,179 $ 682,302 $ 737,176 $ 696,619 $ 688,528

(1)

Comparisons for presented periods are impacted by a number of factors. Refer to the “Significant Items” for additional discussion regarding these key factors.

(2)

Net income excluding expense for amortization of intangibles for the period divided by average tangible common shareholders’ equity. Average tangible common shareholders’ equity equals average total common shareholders’ equity less average intangible assets and goodwill. Expense for amortization of intangibles and average intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.

(3)

On a fully-taxable equivalent (FTE) basis assuming a 35% tax rate.

(4)

Noninterest expense less amortization of intangibles divided by the sum of FTE net interest income and noninterest income excluding securities gains.

10


Table of Contents

Table 2—Selected Year to Date Income Statement Data(1)

Six Months Ended June 30, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Interest income

$ 927,901 $ 967,481 $ (39,580 ) (4 )%

Interest expense

78,794 121,310 (42,516 ) (35 )

Net interest income

849,107 846,171 2,936

Provision for credit losses

54,314 70,926 (16,612 ) (23 )

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

794,793 775,245 19,548 3

Service charges on deposit accounts

128,892 126,290 2,602 2

Mortgage banking income

78,907 84,767 (5,860 ) (7 )

Trust services

61,826 60,820 1,006 2

Electronic banking

44,058 39,144 4,914 13

Brokerage income

37,541 38,285 (744 ) (2 )

Insurance income

36,439 36,259 180

Gain on sale of loans

5,964 30,901 (24,937 ) (81 )

Bank owned life insurance income

28,863 27,904 959 3

Capital markets fees

20,063 23,056 (2,993 ) (13 )

Securities gains (losses)

(919 ) (263 ) (656 ) 249

Other income

59,230 71,976 (12,746 ) (18 )

Total noninterest income

500,864 539,139 (38,275 ) (7 )

Personnel costs

522,757 486,532 36,225 7

Outside data processing and other services

99,163 91,160 8,003 9

Net occupancy

57,770 54,553 3,217 6

Equipment

49,827 50,417 (590 ) (1 )

Deposit and other insurance expense

28,950 36,469 (7,519 ) (21 )

Professional services

16,533 25,734 (9,201 ) (36 )

Marketing

25,210 30,965 (5,755 ) (19 )

Amortization of intangibles

20,682 23,471 (2,789 ) (12 )

OREO and foreclosure expense

2,395 9,056 (6,661 ) (74 )

Gain on early extinguishment of debt

(2,580 ) 2,580 (100 )

Other expense

65,371 101,168 (35,797 ) (35 )

Total noninterest expense

888,658 906,945 (18,287 ) (2 )

Income before income taxes

406,999 407,439 (440 )

Provision for income taxes

104,568 101,463 3,105 3

Net income

$ 302,431 $ 305,976 $ (3,545 ) (1 )%

Dividends declared on preferred shares

15,937 16,033 (96 ) (1 )

Net income applicable to common shares

$ 286,494 $ 289,943 $ (3,449 ) (1 )%

Average common shares—basic

837,917 863,380 (25,463 ) (3 )%

Average common shares—diluted

846,274 868,357 (22,083 ) (3 )

Per common share

Net income per common share - basic

$ 0.34 $ 0.34 $ %

Net income per common share - diluted

0.34 0.33 0.01 3

Cash dividends declared

0.09 0.08 0.01 13

Revenue—FTE

Net interest income

$ 849,107 $ 846,171 $ 2,936 %

FTE adjustment

12,510 9,682 2,828 29

Net interest income (2)

861,617 855,853 5,764 1

Noninterest income

500,864 539,139 (38,275 ) (7 )

Total revenue (2)

$ 1,362,481 $ 1,394,992 $ (32,511 ) (2 )%

(1) Comparisons for presented periods are impacted by a number of factors. Refer to the ‘Significant Items” discussion.
(2) On a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis assuming a 35% tax rate.

11


Table of Contents

Significant Items

Definition of Significant Items

From time-to-time, revenue, expenses, or taxes are impacted by items judged by us to be outside of ordinary banking activities and / or by items that, while they may be associated with ordinary banking activities, are so unusually large that their outsized impact is believed by us at that time to be infrequent or short-term in nature. We refer to such items as Significant Items. Most often, these Significant Items result from factors originating outside the company; e.g., regulatory actions / assessments, windfall gains, changes in accounting principles, one-time tax assessments / refunds, litigation actions, etc. In other cases, they may result from our decisions associated with significant corporate actions outside of the ordinary course of business; e.g., merger / restructuring charges, recapitalization actions, goodwill impairment, etc.

Even though certain revenue and expense items are naturally subject to more volatility than others due to changes in market and economic environment conditions, as a general rule volatility alone does not define a Significant Item. For example, changes in the provision for credit losses, gains / losses from investment activities, asset valuation writedowns, etc., reflect ordinary banking activities and are, therefore, typically excluded from consideration as a Significant Item.

We believe the disclosure of Significant Items provides a better understanding of our performance and trends to ascertain which of such items, if any, to include or exclude from an analysis of our performance; i.e., within the context of determining how that performance differed from expectations, as well as how, if at all, to adjust estimates of future performance accordingly. To this end, we adopted a practice of listing Significant Items in our external disclosure documents; e.g., earnings press releases, investor presentations, Forms 10-Q and 10-K.

Significant Items for any particular period are not intended to be a complete list of items that may materially impact current or future period performance.

Significant Items Influencing Financial Performance Comparisons

Earnings comparisons were impacted by the Significant Items summarized below:

1. Litigation Reserve. During the 2012 first quarter, a $23.5 million addition to litigation reserves was recorded in other noninterest expense. This resulted in a negative impact of $0.02 per common share on a year-to-date basis.

2. Bargain Purchase Gain. During the 2012 first quarter, an $11.4 million bargain purchase gain associated with the FDIC-assisted Fidelity Bank acquisition was recorded in noninterest income. This resulted in a positive impact of $0.01 per common share on a year-to-date basis.

The following table reflects the earnings impact of the above-mentioned Significant Items for periods affected by this Results of Operations discussion:

Table 3—Significant Items Influencing Earnings Performance Comparison

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2013 March 31, 2013 June 30, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

After-tax EPS (2) After-tax EPS (2) After-tax EPS (2)

Net income

$ 150,651 $ 151,780 $ 152,706

Earnings per share, after-tax

$ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.17

Change from prior quarter—$

(0.02 )

Change from prior quarter—%

% (11 )% %

Change from year-ago—$

$ $ $ 0.01

Change from year-ago—%

% % 6 %

12


Table of Contents
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013 June 30, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

After-tax EPS (2) After-tax EPS (2)

Net income

$ 302,431 $ 305,976

Earnings per share, after-tax

$ 0.34 $ 0.33

Change from a year-ago—$

0.01 0.03

Change from a year-ago—%

3 % 10 %

Significant Items - favorable (unfavorable) impact:

Earnings (1) EPS (2) Earnings (1) EPS (2)

Bargain purchase gain

11,409 0.01

Litigation reserves addition

(23,500 ) (0.02 )

(1)

Pretax unless otherwise noted.

(2)

After-tax.

Net Interest Income / Average Balance Sheet

The following tables detail the change in our average balance sheet and the net interest margin:

13


Table of Contents

Table 4—Consolidated Quarterly Average Balance Sheets

Average Balances Change
2013 2012 2Q13 vs. 2Q12

(dollar amounts in millions)

Second First Fourth Third Second Amount Percent

Assets:

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

$ 84 $ 72 $ 73 $ 82 $ 124 $ (40 ) (32 )%

Loans held for sale

678 709 840 1,829 410 268 65

Securities:

Available-for-sale and other securities:

Taxable

6,728 6,964 7,131 8,014 8,285 (1,557 ) (19 )

Tax-exempt

591 549 492 423 387 204 53

Total available-for-sale and other securities

7,319 7,513 7,623 8,437 8,672 (1,353 ) (16 )

Trading account securities

84 85 97 66 54 30 56

Held-to-maturity securities—taxable

1,711 1,717 1,652 796 611 1,100 180

Total securities

9,114 9,315 9,372 9,299 9,337 (223 ) (2 )

Loans and leases: (1)

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

17,033 16,954 16,507 16,343 16,094 939 6

Commercial real estate:

Construction

586 598 576 569 584 2

Commercial

4,429 4,694 4,897 5,153 5,491 (1,062 ) (19 )

Commercial real estate

5,015 5,292 5,473 5,722 6,075 (1,060 ) (17 )

Total commercial

22,048 22,246 21,980 22,065 22,169 (121 ) (1 )

Consumer:

Automobile

5,283 4,833 4,486 4,065 4,985 298 6

Home equity

8,263 8,395 8,345 8,369 8,310 (47 ) (1 )

Residential mortgage

5,225 4,978 5,155 5,177 5,253 (28 ) (1 )

Other consumer

461 412 431 444 462 (1 )

Total consumer

19,232 18,618 18,417 18,055 19,010 222 1

Total loans and leases

41,280 40,864 40,397 40,120 41,179 101

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(746 ) (772 ) (783 ) (855 ) (908 ) 162 (18 )

Net loans and leases

40,534 40,092 39,614 39,265 40,271 263 1

Total earning assets

51,156 50,960 50,682 51,330 51,050 106

Cash and due from banks

940 904 1,459 960 928 12 1

Intangible assets

563 571 581 597 609 (46 ) (8 )

All other assets

3,976 4,065 4,115 4,106 4,158 (182 ) (4 )

Total assets

$ 55,889 $ 55,728 $ 56,054 $ 56,138 $ 55,837 $ 52 %

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:

Deposits:

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 12,879 $ 12,165 $ 13,121 $ 12,329 $ 12,064 $ 815 7 %

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

5,927 5,977 5,843 5,814 5,939 (12 )

Total demand deposits

18,806 18,142 18,964 18,143 18,003 803 4

Money market deposits

15,069 15,045 14,749 14,515 13,182 1,887 14

Savings and other domestic deposits

5,115 5,083 4,960 4,975 4,978 137 3

Core certificates of deposit

4,778 5,346 5,637 6,131 6,618 (1,840 ) (28 )

Total core deposits

43,768 43,616 44,310 43,764 42,781 987 2

Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more

324 360 359 300 298 26 9

Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs

1,779 1,697 1,756 1,878 1,421 358 25

Deposits in foreign offices

316 340 342 356 357 (41 ) (11 )

Total deposits

46,187 46,013 46,767 46,298 44,857 1,330 3

Short-term borrowings

701 762 1,012 1,329 1,391 (690 ) (50 )

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

757 686 42 107 626 131 21

Subordinated notes and other long-term debt

1,292 1,348 1,374 1,638 2,251 (959 ) (43 )

Total interest-bearing liabilities

36,058 36,644 36,074 37,043 37,061 (1,003 ) (3 )

All other liabilities

1,064 1,085 1,017 1,035 1,094 (30 ) (3 )

Shareholders’ equity

5,888 5,834 5,842 5,731 5,618 270 5

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 55,889 $ 55,728 $ 56,054 $ 56,138 $ 55,837 $ 52 %

(1) For purposes of this analysis, NALs are reflected in the average balances of loans.

14


Table of Contents

Table 5—Consolidated Quarterly Net Interest Margin Analysis

Average Rates (2)

Fully-taxable equivalent basis (1)

2013 2012
Second First Fourth Third Second

Assets

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

0.27 % 0.16 % 0.28 % 0.21 % 0.31 %

Loans held for sale

3.39 3.22 3.18 3.18 3.46

Securities:

Available-for-sale and other securities:

Taxable

2.29 2.31 2.32 2.29 2.33

Tax-exempt

3.94 3.96 4.03 4.15 4.23

Total available-for-sale and other securities

2.42 2.43 2.43 2.39 2.41

Trading account securities

0.60 0.50 1.01 1.07 1.64

Held-to-maturity securities—taxable

2.29 2.29 2.24 2.81 2.97

Total securities

2.38 2.39 2.38 2.41 2.45

Loans and leases: (3)

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

3.75 3.83 3.88 3.90 3.99

Commercial real estate:

Construction

3.93 4.05 4.13 3.84 3.66

Commercial

4.13 4.00 4.20 3.85 3.93

Commercial real estate

4.09 4.01 4.19 3.85 3.89

Total commercial

3.83 3.87 3.96 3.89 3.97

Consumer:

Automobile

3.96 4.28 4.52 4.87 4.68

Home equity

4.16 4.20 4.24 4.27 4.30

Residential mortgage

3.82 3.97 4.07 4.02 4.14

Other consumer

6.66 7.05 7.16 7.16 7.42

Total consumer

4.07 4.22 4.33 4.40 4.43

Total loans and leases

3.95 4.03 4.13 4.12 4.18

Total earning assets

3.68 % 3.75 % 3.80 % 3.79 % 3.89 %

Liabilities

Deposits:

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

% % % % %

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.07

Total demand deposits

0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02

Money market deposits

0.24 0.23 0.27 0.33 0.30

Savings and other domestic deposits

0.27 0.30 0.33 0.37 0.39

Core certificates of deposit

1.13 1.19 1.21 1.25 1.38

Total core deposits

0.34 0.37 0.41 0.47 0.50

Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more

0.50 0.52 0.61 0.68 0.66

Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs

0.62 0.67 0.71 0.71 0.75

Deposits in foreign offices

0.14 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19

Total deposits

0.36 0.38 0.42 0.48 0.51

Short-term borrowings

0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.16

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

0.14 0.18 1.20 0.50 0.21

Subordinated notes and other long-term debt

2.35 2.54 2.55 2.91 2.83

Total interest-bearing liabilities

0.42 % 0.45 % 0.50 % 0.58 % 0.63 %

Net interest rate spread

3.26 % 3.30 % 3.30 % 3.21 % 3.26 %

Impact of noninterest-bearing funds on margin

0.12 0.12 0.15 0.17 0.16

Net interest margin

3.38 % 3.42 % 3.45 % 3.38 % 3.42 %

(1)

FTE yields are calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.

(2)

Loan and lease and deposit average rates include impact of applicable derivatives, non-deferrable fees, and amortized deferred fees.

(3)

For purposes of this analysis, NALs are reflected in the average balances of loans.

15


Table of Contents

Table 6—Average Loans/Leases and Deposits

Second Quarter First Quarter 2Q13 vs 2Q12 2Q13 vs 1Q13

(dollar amounts in millions)

2013 2012 2013 Amount Percent Amount Percent

Loans/Leases:

Commercial and industrial

$ 17,033 $ 16,094 $ 16,954 $ 939 6 % $ 79 %

Commercial real estate

5,015 6,075 5,292 (1,060 ) (17 ) (277 ) (5 )

Total commercial

22,048 22,169 22,246 (121 ) (1 ) (198 ) (1 )

Automobile

5,283 4,985 4,833 298 6 450 9

Home equity

8,263 8,310 8,395 (47 ) (1 ) (132 ) (2 )

Residential mortgage

5,225 5,253 4,978 (28 ) (1 ) 247 5

Other loans

461 462 412 (1 ) (0 ) 49 12

Total consumer

19,232 19,010 18,618 222 1 614 3

Total loans and leases

$ 41,280 $ 41,179 $ 40,864 $ 101 % $ 416 1 %

Deposits:

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 12,879 $ 12,064 $ 12,165 $ 815 7 % $ 714 6 %

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

5,927 5,939 5,977 (12 ) (0 ) (50 ) (1 )

Total demand deposits

18,806 18,003 18,142 803 4 664 4

Money market deposits

15,069 13,182 15,045 1,887 14 24

Savings and other domestic time deposits

5,115 4,978 5,083 137 3 32 1

Core certificates of deposit

4,778 6,618 5,346 (1,840 ) (28 ) (568 ) (11 )

Total core deposits

43,768 42,781 43,616 987 2 152

Other deposits

2,419 2,076 2,397 343 17 22 1

Total deposits

$ 46,187 $ 44,857 $ 46,013 $ 1,330 3 % $ 174 %

2013 Second Quarter versus 2012 Second Quarter

Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income decreased $3.2 million, or 1%, from the year-ago quarter. This reflected a 4 basis point decrease in the FTE net interest margin, partially offset by a $0.1 billion, or less than 1%, increase in average total earning assets. The primary items impacting the decrease in the net interest margin were:

21 basis point negative impact from the mix and yield of earning assets primarily reflecting a decrease in consumer loan yields.

Partially offset by:

16 basis point positive impact from the mix and yield of deposits reflecting the strategic focus on changing the funding sources to no-cost demand deposits and low cost money market deposits.

The $0.1 billion, or less than 1%, increase in average total loans and leases primarily reflected:

$0.9 billion, or 6%, growth in average C&I loans. This reflected the continued growth across most business lines, with particularly strong growth in the healthcare vertical, dealer floorplan, and equipment finance.

$0.3 billion, or 6%, increase in average automobile loans. In addition, $0.3 billion of automobile loans were transferred from held for sale to automobile loans and leases on June 30, as there are no securitizations expected for the remainder of 2013. This transfer had a minimal impact on average balances.

Partially offset by:

$1.1 billion, or 17%, decrease in average commercial real estate (CRE) loans. This reflected continued runoff of the noncore portfolio and managed reduction of the core portfolios as acceptable returns for new core origination were balanced against internal concentration limits and increased competition for projects sponsored by high quality developers.

16


Table of Contents

The $1.0 billion, or 3%, decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities from the year-ago quarter reflected:

$1.5 billion, or 36%, decrease in subordinated notes and other short and long-term debt including the repayment of $0.6 billion of TLGP related debt and the redemption of $0.2 billion of trust preferred securities in 2012 second half.

$1.8 billion, or 28%, decrease in average core certificates of deposit due to the strategic focus on changing the funding sources to no-cost demand deposits and low cost money markets deposits.

Partially offset by:

$1.9 billion, or 14%, increase in money market deposits reflecting the strategic focus on increased share of wallet and customer preference for increased liquidity.

2013 Second Quarter versus 2013 First Quarter

Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income increased $1.4 million, or less than 1%, from the last quarter reflecting a $0.2 billion increase in average earnings assets as well as an additional day in the quarter, partially offset by a 4 basis point decrease in net interest margin. The primary items affecting the net interest margin were:

7 basis point negative impact from the mix and yield of earning assets.

Partially offset by:

2 basis point positive impact from the mix and yield of deposits.

The $0.4 billion, or 1%, increase in average total loans and leases from the 2013 first quarter reflected:

$0.5 billion, or 9%, increase in automobile loans.

$0.2 billion, or 5%, increase in residential mortgage loans.

Partially offset by:

$0.3 billion, or 5%, decrease in commercial real estate loans.

The $0.6 billion, or 2%, decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities from the 2013 first quarter reflected:

$0.6 billion, or 11%, decrease in core certificates of deposits.

17


Table of Contents

Table 7—Consolidated YTD Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Margin Analysis

YTD Average Balances YTD Average Rates (2)
Fully-taxable equivalent basis (1) Six Months Ended June 30, Change Six Months Ended June 30,

(dollar amounts in millions)

2013 2012 Amount Percent 2013 2012

Assets:

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

$ 78 $ 112 $ (34 ) (30 )% 0.22 % 0.19 %

Loans held for sale

694 837 (143 ) (17 ) 3.35 3.71

Securities:

Available-for-sale and other securities:

Taxable

6,845 8,228 (1,383 ) (17 ) 2.30 2.36

Tax-exempt

570 396 174 44 3.95 4.20

Total available-for-sale and other securities

7,415 8,624 (1,209 ) (14 ) 3.95 4.20

Trading account securities

85 52 33 63 0.55 1.65

Held-to-maturity securities—taxable

1,714 622 1,092 176 2.29 2.98

Total securities

9,214 9,298 (84 ) (1 ) 2.38 2.47

Loans and leases: (3)

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

16,994 15,458 1,536 10 3.79 4.00

Commercial real estate:

Construction

592 591 1 3.99 3.76

Commercial

4,561 5,373 (812 ) (15 ) 4.06 3.88

Commercial real estate

5,153 5,964 (811 ) (14 ) 4.06 3.87

Total commercial

22,147 21,422 725 3 3.85 3.96

Consumer:

Automobile

5,058 4,781 277 6 4.11 4.77

Home equity

8,277 8,272 5 4.17 4.30

Residential mortgage

5,102 5,214 (112 ) (2 ) 3.89 4.15

Other consumer

488 473 15 3 6.76 7.44

Total consumer

18,925 18,740 185 1 4.15 4.46

Total loans and leases

41,072 40,162 910 2 3.99 4.20

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(758 ) (934 ) 176 (19 )

Net loans and leases

40,314 39,228 1,086 3

Total earning assets

51,058 50,409 649 1 3.71 % 3.90 %

Cash and due from banks

922 970 (48 ) (5 )

Intangible assets

567 611 (44 ) (7 )

All other assets

4,020 4,191 (171 ) (4 )

Total assets

$ 55,809 $ 55,247 $ 562 1 %

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:

Deposits:

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 12,524 $ 11,668 $ 856 7 % % %

Demand deposits–interest-bearing

5,952 5,792 160 3 0.04 0.06

Total demand deposits

18,476 17,460 1,016 6 0.01 0.02

Money market deposits

15,057 13,162 1,895 14 0.23 0.28

Savings and other domestic deposits

5,099 4,898 201 4 0.29 0.42

Core certificates of deposit

5,060 6,564 (1,504 ) (23 ) 1.16 1.49

Total core deposits

43,692 42,084 1,608 4 0.36 0.52

Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more

342 323 19 6 0.51 0.67

Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs

1,738 1,361 377 28 0.65 0.77

Deposits in foreign offices

328 393 (65 ) (17 ) 0.15 0.19

Total deposits

46,100 44,161 1,939 4 0.37 0.53

Short-term borrowings

732 1,451 (719 ) (50 ) 0.11 0.16

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

722 523 199 38 0.16 0.21

Subordinated notes and other long-term debt

1,320 2,452 (1,132 ) (46 ) 2.45 2.78

Total interest-bearing liabilities

36,350 36,919 (569 ) (2 ) 0.44 0.66

All other liabilities

1,074 1,105 (31 ) (3 )

Shareholders’ equity

5,861 5,555 306 6

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 55,809 $ 55,247 $ 562 1 %

Net interest rate spread

3.28 3.24

Impact of noninterest-bearing funds on margin

0.12 0.17

Net interest margin

3.40 % 3.41 %

(1)

FTE yields are calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.

(2)

Loan, lease, and deposit average rates include the impact of applicable derivatives, non-deferrable fees, and amortized deferred fees.

(3)

For purposes of this analysis, nonaccrual loans are reflected in the average balances of loans.

18


Table of Contents

2013 First Six Months versus 2012 First Six Months

Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income for the first six-month period of 2013 increased $5.8 million, or less than 1%, from the comparable year-ago period. This reflected the benefit of a $0.6 billion, or 1%, increase in average total earning assets. The fully-taxable equivalent net interest margin decreased to 3.40% from 3.41%. The increase in average earning assets reflected:

$0.9 billion, or 2%, increase in average total loans and leases.

The following table details the change in our reported loans and deposits:

Table 8—Average Loans/Leases and Deposits— 2013 First Six Months vs. 2012 First Six Months

Six Months Ended June 30, Change

(dollar amounts in millions)

2013 (1) 2012 Amount Percent

Loans/Leases:

Commercial and industrial

$ 16,994 $ 15,458 $ 1,536 10 %

Commercial real estate

5,153 5,964 (811 ) (14 )

Total commercial

22,147 21,422 725 3

Automobile

5,058 4,781 277 6

Home equity

8,277 8,272 5

Residential mortgage

5,102 5,214 (112 ) (2 )

Other consumer

488 473 15 3

Total consumer

18,925 18,740 185 1

Total loans and leases

$ 41,072 $ 40,162 $ 910 2 %

Deposits:

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 12,524 $ 11,668 $ 856 7 %

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

5,952 5,792 160 3

Total demand deposits

18,476 17,460 1,016 6

Money market deposits

15,057 13,162 1,895 14

Savings and other domestic deposits

5,099 4,898 201 4

Core certificates of deposit

5,060 6,564 (1,504 ) (23 )

Total core deposits

43,692 42,084 1,608 4

Other deposits

2,408 2,077 331 16

Total deposits

$ 46,100 $ 44,161 $ 1,939 4 %

(1) The acquisition of Fidelity Bank on March 30, 2012, contributed to the increase in average loans and deposits.

The $0.9 billion, or 2%, increase in average total loans and leases primarily reflected:

$1.5 billion, or 10%, increase in the average C&I portfolio, primarily reflecting a combination of factors, including growth across multiple business lines including healthcare vertical, dealer floorplan, and equipment finance.

$0.3 billion, or 6%, increase in the average automobile portfolio. While having a minimal impact on average balances, $0.3 billion of automobile loans were transferred from held for sale to automobile loan and leases on June 30, 2013, as there are no securitizations expected for the remainder of 2013.

Partially offset by:

$0.8 billion, or 14%, decline in the average CRE loans. This reflected continued runoff of the noncore and core portfolios as we balanced acceptable returns for new core origination against internal concentration limits and increased competition, particularly pricing, for high quality developers and projects.

19


Table of Contents

The $1.9 billion, or 4%, increase in average total deposits reflected:

$1.9 billion, or 14%, increase in money market deposits.

$1.0 billion, or 6%, increase in total demand deposits.

Partially offset by:

$1.5 billion, or 23%, decline in core certificates of deposits.

20


Table of Contents

Provision for Credit Losses

(This section should be read in conjunction with the Credit Risk section.)

The provision for credit losses is the expense necessary to maintain the ALLL and the AULC at levels appropriate to absorb our estimate of inherent credit losses in the loan and lease portfolio and the portfolio of unfunded loan commitments and letters-of-credit.

The provision for credit losses for the 2013 second quarter declined $4.9 million, or 16%, from the prior quarter and declined $11.8 million, or 32%, from the year-ago quarter. The provision for credit losses for the first six-month period of 2013 declined $16.6 million, or 23%, compared with the first six-month period of 2012. The current quarter’s provision for credit losses was $10.1 million less than total NCOs, and the provision for credit losses for the first six-month period of 2013 was $32.2 million less than total NCOs for the same period. (See Credit Quality discussion). Given the absolute low level of the provision for credit losses and the uncertain and uneven nature of the economic recovery, some degree of volatility on a quarter-to-quarter basis is expected.

Noninterest Income

(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 2.)

The following table reflects noninterest income for each of the past five quarters:

Table 9—Noninterest Income

2013 2012 2Q13 vs 2Q12 2Q13 vs 1Q13

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Second First Fourth Third Second Amount Percent Amount Percent

Service charges on deposit accounts

$ 68,009 $ 60,883 $ 68,083 $ 67,806 $ 65,998 $ 2,011 3 % $ 7,126 12 %

Mortgage banking income

33,659 45,248 61,711 44,614 38,349 (4,690 ) (12 ) (11,589 ) (26 )

Trust services

30,666 31,160 31,388 29,689 29,914 752 3 (494 ) (2 )

Electronic banking

23,345 20,713 21,011 22,135 20,514 2,831 14 2,632 13

Brokerage income

19,546 17,995 17,415 16,526 19,025 521 3 1,551 9

Insurance income

17,187 19,252 17,268 17,792 17,384 (197 ) (1 ) (2,065 ) (11 )

Gain on sale of loans

3,348 2,616 20,690 6,591 4,131 (783 ) (19 ) 732 28

Bank owned life insurance income

15,421 13,442 13,767 14,371 13,967 1,454 10 1,979 15

Capital markets fees

12,229 7,834 12,694 11,596 13,260 (1,031 ) (8 ) 4,395 56

Securities gains (losses)

(410 ) (509 ) 863 4,169 350 (760 ) (217 ) 99 (19 )

Other income

25,655 33,575 32,761 25,778 30,927 (5,272 ) (17 ) (7,920 ) (24 )

Total noninterest income

$ 248,655 $ 252,209 $ 297,651 $ 261,067 $ 253,819 $ (5,164 ) (2 )% $ (3,554 ) (1 )%

2013 Second Quarter versus 2012 Second Quarter

The $5.2 million, or 2%, decrease in total noninterest income from the year-ago quarter reflected:

$5.3 million, or 17%, decrease in other noninterest income including a $4.3 million reduction in gains on the sale of Low Income Housing Tax Credit investments.

$4.7 million, or 12%, decrease in mortgage banking income as the benefit of net mortgage servicing rights decreased by $2.5 million while origination and secondary marketing income declined $2.3 million primarily due to lower spreads.

Partially offset by:

$2.8 million, or 14%, increase in electronic banking.

$1.5 million, or 10%, increase in bank owned life insurance income.

2013 Second Quarter versus 2013 First Quarter

The $3.6 million, or 1%, decrease in total noninterest income from the prior quarter reflected:

$11.6 million, or 26%, decrease in mortgage banking income as the benefit of net mortgage servicing rights decreased by $11.6 million.

$7.9 million, or 24%, decrease in other noninterest income as the prior quarter included a $7.6 million gain on the sale of Low Income Housing Tax Credit investments.

21


Table of Contents

Partially offset by:

$7.1 million, or 12%, increase in service charges on deposit accounts which reflect yearly seasonality trends in customer activity and an 8% annualized growth in consumer checking households.

$4.4 million, or 56%, increase in capital markets activity.

$2.6 million, or 13%, increase in electronic banking.

2013 First Six Months versus 2012 First Six Months

Noninterest income for the first six-month period of 2013 decreased $38.3 million, or 7%, from the comparable year-ago period.

Table 10—Noninterest Income—2013 First Six Months vs. 2012 First Six Months

Six Months Ended June 30, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Service charges on deposit accounts

$ 128,892 $ 126,290 $ 2,602 2 %

Mortgage banking income

78,907 84,767 (5,860 ) (7 )

Trust services

61,826 60,820 1,006 2

Electronic banking

44,058 39,144 4,914 13

Brokerage income

37,541 38,285 (744 ) (2 )

Insurance income

36,439 36,259 180

Gain on sale of loans

5,964 30,901 (24,937 ) (81 )

Bank owned life insurance income

28,863 27,904 959 3

Capital markets fees

20,063 23,056 (2,993 ) (13 )

Securities gains (losses)

(919 ) (263 ) (656 ) N.M.

Other income

59,230 71,976 (12,746 ) (18 )

Total noninterest income

$ 500,864 $ 539,139 $ (38,275 ) (7 )%

The $38.3 million, or 7%, decrease in total noninterest income reflected:

$24.9 million, or 81%, decrease in gain on sale of loans, primarily related to the year-ago period’s automobile loan securitization.

$12.7 million, or 18%, decrease in other noninterest income, primarily related to prior year’s $11.4 million bargain purchase gain from the FDIC-assisted Fidelity Bank acquisition and due to auto operating lease portfolio run off.

$5.9 million, or 7%, decrease in mortgage banking income. This primarily reflected a $6.2 million decrease in origination and secondary marketing income.

Partially offset by:

$4.9 million, or 13%, increase in electronic banking income, primarily reflecting the seasonality and increase in debit card usage.

22


Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense

(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 1.)

The following table reflects noninterest expense for each of the past five quarters:

Table 11—Noninterest Expense

2013 2012 2Q13 vs 2Q12 2Q13 vs 1Q13

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Second First Fourth Third Second Amount Percent Amount Percent

Personnel costs

$ 263,862 $ 258,895 $ 253,952 $ 247,709 $ 243,034 $ 20,828 9 % $ 4,967 2 %

Outside data processing and other services

49,898 49,265 48,699 50,396 48,568 1,330 3 633 1

Net occupancy

27,656 30,114 29,008 27,599 25,474 2,182 9 (2,458 ) (8 )

Equipment

24,947 24,880 26,580 25,950 24,872 75 67

Deposit and other insurance expense

13,460 15,490 16,327 15,534 15,731 (2,271 ) (14 ) (2,030 ) (13 )

Professional services

9,341 7,192 22,514 17,510 15,037 (5,696 ) (38 ) 2,149 30

Marketing

14,239 10,971 16,456 16,842 17,396 (3,157 ) (18 ) 3,268 30

Amortization of intangibles

10,362 10,320 11,647 11,431 11,940 (1,578 ) (13 ) 42

OREO and foreclosure expense

(271 ) 2,666 4,233 4,982 4,106 (4,377 ) (107 ) (2,937 ) (110 )

Loss (Gain) on early extinguishment of debt

1,782 (2,580 ) 2,580 (100 )

Other expense

32,371 33,000 41,212 38,568 40,691 (8,320 ) (20 ) (629 ) (2 )

Total noninterest expense

$ 445,865 $ 442,793 $ 470,628 $ 458,303 $ 444,269 $ 1,596 % $ 3,072 1 %

Number of employees (full-time equivalent), at period-end

12,155 12,052 11,806 11,731 11,417 738 6 103 1

2013 Second Quarter versus 2012 Second Quarter

The $1.6 million, or less than 1%, increase in total noninterest expense from the year-ago quarter reflected:

$20.8 million, or 9%, increase in personnel costs, reflecting increased salaries and benefits and a 6% increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees, primarily reflecting growth in the in-store initiative and mortgage business.

Partially offset by:

$8.3 million, or 20%, decrease in other expense, reflecting lower representations and warranties-related expenses and lower litigation expense.

$5.7 million, or 38%, decrease in professional services, reflecting a decrease in legal and outside consultant expenses.

$4.4 million, or 107%, decline in OREO and foreclosure expense, as there were net recoveries of $0.3 million during the 2013 second quarter.

$3.2 million, or 18%, decrease in marketing, primarily reflecting the refinement of targeted marketing programs and reduced promotional offers.

2013 Second Quarter versus 2013 First Quarter

The $3.1 million, or 1%, increase in total noninterest expense from the prior quarter reflected:

$5.0 million, or 2%, increase in personnel costs reflecting higher commission expense.

$3.3 million, or 30%, seasonal increase in marketing.

Partially offset by:

$2.9 million, or 110%, decrease in OREO and foreclosure.

$2.0 million, or 13%, decrease in deposit and other insurance expense.

2013 First Six Months versus 2012 First Six Months

Noninterest expense for the first six-month period of 2013 decreased $18.3 million, or 2%, from the comparable year-ago period.

23


Table of Contents

Table 12—Noninterest Expense—2013 First Six Months vs. 2012 First Six Months

Six Months Ended June 30, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Personnel costs

$ 522,757 $ 486,532 $ 36,225 7 %

Outside data processing and other services

99,163 91,160 8,003 9

Net occupancy

57,770 54,553 3,217 6

Equipment

49,827 50,417 (590 ) (1 )

Deposit and other insurance expense

28,950 36,469 (7,519 ) (21 )

Professional services

16,533 25,734 (9,201 ) (36 )

Marketing

25,210 30,965 (5,755 ) (19 )

Amortization of intangibles

20,682 23,471 (2,789 ) (12 )

OREO and foreclosure expense

2,395 9,056 (6,661 ) (74 )

Gain on early extinguishment of debt

(2,580 ) 2,580 N.M.

Other expense

65,371 101,168 (35,797 ) (35 )

Total noninterest expense

$ 888,658 $ 906,945 $ (18,287 ) (2 )%

Number of employees (full-time equivalent), at period-end

12,155 11,417 738 6 %

The $18.3 million, or 2%, decrease in total noninterest expense reflected:

$35.8 million, or 35%, decrease in other expense, primarily reflecting a decrease in operating lease expense as the automobile lease portfolio continues to run off and is expected to be essentially zero by the end of the year and the decrease in the provision for mortgage representations and warranties. The year-ago period’s included a $23.5 million addition to litigation reserves.

$9.2 million, or 36%, decrease in professional services.

$7.5 million, or 21%, decrease in deposit and other insurance, reflecting lower insurance premiums.

Partially offset by:

$36.2 million, or 7%, increase in personnel costs, primarily reflecting an increase in bonuses, commissions, and full-time equivalent employees, as well as increased salaries and benefits.

$8.0 million, or 9%, increase in outside data processing and other services primarily related to continued IT infrastructure investments.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes in the 2013 second quarter was $52.4 million and $49.3 million in the 2012 second quarter. The provision for income taxes for the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 was $104.6 million and $101.5 million, respectively. Both quarters included the benefits from tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments, and general business credits. At June 30, 2013, we had a net federal deferred tax asset of $159.0 million and a net state deferred tax asset of $39.7 million. At December 31, 2012, we had a net federal deferred tax asset of $171.4 million and a net state deferred tax asset of $32.4 million. Based on both positive and negative evidence and our level of forecasted future taxable income, there was no impairment to the net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there was no disallowed deferred tax asset for regulatory capital purposes.

We file income tax returns with the IRS and various state, city, and foreign jurisdictions. Federal income tax audits have been completed for tax years through 2009. We have appealed certain proposed adjustments resulting from the IRS examination of our 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 tax returns. We believe the tax positions taken related to such proposed adjustments are correct and supported by applicable statutes, regulations, and judicial authority, and intend to vigorously defend them. In 2011, we entered into discussions with the Appeals Division of the IRS for the 2006 and 2007 tax returns. It is possible the ultimate resolution of the proposed adjustments, if unfavorable, may be material to the results of operations in the period it occurs. Nevertheless, although no assurances can be given, we believe the resolution of these examinations will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position. In the first quarter of 2013, the IRS began an examination of our 2010 and 2011 consolidated federal income tax returns. Various state and other jurisdictions remain open to examination, including Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Illinois.

24


Table of Contents

RISK MANAGEMENT AND CAPITAL

Risk awareness, identification and assessment, reporting, and active management are key elements in overall risk management. We manage risk to an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile through a control framework and by monitoring and responding to identified potential risks. Controls include, among others, effective segregation of duties, access, authorization and reconciliation procedures, as well as staff education and a disciplined assessment process.

We identify primary risks, and the sources of those risks, within each business unit. We utilize Risk and Control Self-Assessments (RCSA) to identify exposure risks. Through this RCSA process, we continually assess the effectiveness of controls associated with the identified risks, regularly monitor risk profiles and material exposure to losses, and identify stress events and scenarios to which we may be exposed. Our chief risk officer is responsible for ensuring that appropriate systems of controls are in place for managing and monitoring risk across the Company. Potential risk concerns are shared with the Risk Management Committee, Risk Oversight Committee, and the board of directors, as appropriate. Our internal audit department performs on-going independent reviews of the risk management process and ensures the adequacy of documentation. The results of these reviews are reported regularly to the audit committee and board of directors.

We believe that our primary risk exposures are credit, market, liquidity, operational, and compliance oriented. More information on risk can be found in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A of our 2012 Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC. Additionally, the MD&A included in our 2012 Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with this MD&A as this discussion provides only material updates to the 2012 Form 10-K. Our definition, philosophy, and approach to risk management have not materially changed from the discussion presented in the 2012 Form 10-K.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a counterparty is not able to meet the agreed upon terms of the financial obligation. The majority of our credit risk is associated with lending activities, as the acceptance and management of credit risk is central to profitable lending. We also have significant credit risk associated with our available-for-sale and other investment and held-to-maturity securities portfolios (see Note 4 and Note 5 of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) . We engage with other financial counterparties for a variety of purposes including investing, asset and liability management, mortgage banking, and trading activities. While there is credit risk associated with derivative activity, we believe this exposure is minimal.

We continue to focus on the identification, monitoring, and managing of our credit risk. In addition to the traditional credit risk mitigation strategies of credit policies and processes, market risk management activities, and portfolio diversification, we use additional quantitative measurement capabilities utilizing external data sources, enhanced use of modeling technology, and internal stress testing processes. Our portfolio management resources demonstrate our commitment to maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile. In our efforts to continue to identify risk mitigation techniques, we have focused on product design features, origination policies, and treatment strategies for delinquent or stressed borrowers.

Loan and Lease Credit Exposure Mix

At June 30, 2013, loans and leases totaled $41.7 billion, representing a $1.0 billion, or 2%, increase compared to $40.7 billion at December 31, 2012, primarily reflecting growth in the automobile portfolio, partially offset by a decline in the CRE portfolio. The automobile portfolio increase reflected a continued strong level of high quality originations.

At June 30, 2013, commercial loans and leases totaled $22.0 billion and represented 52% of our total loan and lease credit exposure. Our commercial portfolio is diversified along product type, customer size, and geography, and is comprised of the following ( see Commercial Credit discussion) :

C&I – C&I loans and leases are made to commercial customers for use in normal business operations to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases, or other projects. The majority of these borrowers are customers doing business within our geographic regions. C&I loans and leases are generally underwritten individually and secured with the assets of the company and/or the personal guarantee of the business owners. The financing of owner occupied facilities is considered a C&I loan even though there is improved real estate as collateral. This treatment is a result of the credit decision process, which focuses on cash flow from operations of the business to repay the debt. The operation, sale, rental, or refinancing of the real estate is not considered the primary repayment source for these types of loans. As we expand our C&I portfolio, we have developed a “vertical” strategy to ensure that new products or lending types are embedded within the structured, centralized Commercial Lending area with designated experienced credit officers.

CRE – CRE loans consist of loans for income-producing real estate properties, real estate investment trusts, and real estate developers. We mitigate our risk on these loans by requiring collateral values that exceed the loan amount and underwriting the loan with projected cash flow in excess of the debt service requirement. These loans are made to finance properties such as apartment buildings, office and industrial buildings, and retail shopping centers, and are repaid through cash flows related to the operation, sale, or refinance of the property.

25


Table of Contents

Construction CRE – Construction CRE loans are loans to developers, companies, or individuals used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property. Our construction CRE portfolio primarily consists of retail, multi family, office, and warehouse project types. Generally, these loans are for construction projects that have been presold or preleased, or have secured permanent financing, as well as loans to real estate companies with significant equity invested in each project. These loans are underwritten and managed by a specialized real estate lending group that actively monitors the construction phase and manages the loan disbursements according to the predetermined construction schedule.

Total consumer loans and leases were $19.7 billion at June 30, 2013 and represented 48% of our total loan and lease credit exposure. The consumer portfolio is primarily comprised of automobile, home equity loans and lines-of-credit, and residential mortgages (see Consumer Credit discussion) .

Automobile – Automobile loans are primarily comprised of loans made through automotive dealerships and include exposure in selected states outside of our primary banking markets. No state outside of our primary banking markets represented more than 5% of our total automobile portfolio at June 30, 2013.

Home equity – Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines-of-credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first-lien or junior-lien on the borrower’s residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home or refinance existing mortgage debt. Products include closed-end loans which are generally fixed-rate with principal and interest payments, and variable-rate, interest-only lines-of-credit which do not require payment of principal during the 10-year revolving period of the line-of-credit. Applications are underwritten centrally in conjunction with an automated underwriting system. The home equity underwriting criteria is based on minimum credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, and LTV ratios, with current collateral valuations.

Residential mortgage – Residential mortgage loans represent loans to consumers for the purchase or refinance of a residence. These loans are generally financed over a 15-year to 30-year term, and in most cases, are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence. Applications are underwritten centrally and we do not originate residential mortgages that allow negative amortization or allow the borrower multiple payment options. Residential mortgage loans include a complete full appraisal for collateral valuation.

Other consumer – Primarily consists of consumer loans not secured by real estate, including personal unsecured loans.

The table below provides the composition of our total loan and lease portfolio:

Table 13—Loan and Lease Portfolio Composition

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,

Commercial: (1)

Commercial and industrial

$ 17,113 41 % $ 17,267 42 % $ 16,971 42 % $ 16,478 41 % $ 16,322 41 %

Commercial real estate:

Construction

607 1 574 1 648 2 541 1 591 1

Commercial

4,286 10 4,485 11 4,751 12 4,956 12 5,317 13

Total commercial real estate

4,893 11 5,059 12 5,399 14 5,497 13 5,908 14

Total commercial

22,006 52 22,326 54 22,370 56 21,975 54 22,230 55

Consumer:

Automobile

5,810 14 5,036 12 4,634 11 4,276 11 3,808 10

Home equity

8,369 20 8,474 21 8,335 20 8,381 21 8,344 21

Residential mortgage

5,168 12 5,051 12 4,970 12 5,192 13 5,123 13

Other consumer

387 2 397 1 419 1 436 1 454 1

Total consumer

19,734 48 18,958 46 18,358 44 18,285 46 17,729 45

Total loans and leases

$ 41,740 100 % $ 41,284 100 % $ 40,728 100 % $ 40,260 100 % $ 39,959 100 %

(1) As defined by regulatory guidance, there were no commercial loans outstanding that would be considered a concentration of lending to a particular industry or group of industries.

26


Table of Contents

As shown in the table above, our loan portfolio is diversified by consumer and commercial credit. We designate specific loan types, collateral types, and loan structures as part of our credit concentration policy. C&I lending by segment, specific limits for CRE primary project types, loans secured by residential real estate, shared national credit exposure, and unsecured lending represent examples of specifically tracked components of our concentration management process. Our concentration management process is approved by our Risk Oversight Committee and is one of the strategies utilized to ensure a high quality, well diversified portfolio that is consistent with our overall objective of maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile.

The table below provides our total loan and lease portfolio segregated by the type of collateral securing the loan or lease:

Table 14—Loan and Lease Portfolio by Collateral Type

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,

Secured loans:

Real estate—commercial

$ 8,749 21 % $ 9,041 22 % $ 9,128 22 % $ 9,278 23 % $ 9,398 23 %

Real estate—consumer

13,537 32 13,525 33 13,305 33 13,573 33 13,467 33

Vehicles

7,763 19 6,924 17 6,659 16 6,096 15 5,650 14

Receivables/Inventory

5,260 13 5,383 13 5,178 13 5,046 13 5,026 13

Machinery/Equipment

2,831 7 2,815 7 2,749 7 2,639 7 2,759 7

Securities/Deposits

924 2 840 2 826 2 717 2 789 2

Other

1,020 2 1,014 2 1,090 3 1,110 3 1,043 3

Total secured loans and leases

40,084 96 39,542 96 38,935 96 38,459 96 38,132 95

Unsecured loans and leases

1,656 4 1,742 4 1,793 4 1,801 4 1,827 5

Total loans and leases

$ 41,740 100 % $ 41,284 100 % $ 40,728 100 % $ 40,260 100 % $ 39,959 100 %

Commercial Credit

Refer to the “Commercial Credit” section of our 2012 Form 10-K for our commercial credit underwriting and on-going credit management processes.

C&I PORTFOLIO

The C&I portfolio continues to have strong origination activity as evidenced by the growth over the past 12 months. The credit quality of the portfolio continues to improve as we maintain focus on high quality originations. Problem loans have trended downward, reflecting a combination of proactive risk identification and effective workout strategies implemented by the SAD. Nevertheless, we continue to proactively identify borrowers that may be facing financial difficulty to assess all potential solutions.

CRE PORTFOLIO

We manage the risks inherent in this portfolio specific to CRE lending, focusing on the quality of the developer, and the specifics associated with each project. Generally, we: (1) limit our loans to 80% of the appraised value of the commercial real estate at origination, (2) require net operating cash flows to be 125% of required interest and principal payments, and (3) if the commercial real estate is nonowner occupied, require that at least 50% of the space of the project be preleased. We actively monitor both geographic and project-type concentrations and performance metrics of all CRE loan types, with a focus on loans identified as higher risk based on the risk rating methodology. Both macro-level and loan-level stress-test scenarios based on existing and forecast market conditions are part of the on-going portfolio management process for the CRE portfolio.

In 2010, we segregated our CRE portfolio into core and noncore segments. We believe segregating noncore CRE from core CRE improved our ability to understand the nature, performance prospects, and problem resolution opportunities of these segments, thus allowing us to continue to deal proactively with any emerging credit issues.

A CRE loan is generally considered core when the borrower is an experienced, well-capitalized developer in our Midwest footprint, and has either an established meaningful relationship with us that generated an acceptable return on capital or demonstrates the prospect of becoming one. The core CRE portfolio was $3.7 billion at June 30, 2013, representing 76% of total CRE loans. The performance of the core portfolio has met our expectations based on the consistency of the asset quality metrics within the portfolio. Based on our extensive project level assessment process, including forward-looking collateral valuations, we continue to believe the credit quality of the core portfolio is stable. Loans are not reclassified between the core and noncore segments based on performance.

27


Table of Contents

Credit quality data regarding the ACL and NALs, segregated by core CRE loans and noncore CRE loans, is presented in the following table:

Table 15—Commercial Real Estate—Core vs. Noncore Portfolios

June 30, 2013
Ending Nonaccrual

(dollar amounts in millions)

Balance Prior NCOs ACL $ ACL % Credit Mark (1) Loans

Total core

$ 3,704 $ 32 $ 86 2.32 % 3.16 % $ 38

Noncore—SAD (2)

487 116 119 24.44 38.97 54

Noncore—Other

702 8 55 7.83 8.87 2

Total noncore

1,189 124 174 14.63 22.70 56

Total commercial real estate

$ 4,893 $ 156 $ 260 5.31 % 8.24 % $ 94

December 31, 2012
Ending Nonaccrual

(dollar amounts in millions)

Balance Prior NCOs ACL $ ACL % Credit Mark (1) Loans

Total core

$ 3,937 $ 21 $ 100 2.54 % 3.06 % $ 41

Noncore—SAD (2)

597 145 129 21.61 36.93 82

Noncore—Other

865 18 61 7.05 8.95 4

Total noncore

1,462 163 190 13.00 21.72 86

Total commercial real estate

$ 5,399 $ 184 $ 290 5.37 % 8.49 % $ 127

(1)

Calculated as (Prior NCOs + ACL $) / (Ending Balance + Prior NCOs).

(2)

Noncore loans managed by SAD, the area responsible for managing loans and relationships designated as Classified Loans.

As shown in the above table, the ending balance of the CRE portfolio at June 30, 2013, declined $0.5 billion, or 9%, compared with December 31, 2012. The decline in the noncore segment primarily reflected amortization and payoffs as we actively focus on the noncore portfolio to reduce our overall CRE exposure. This reduction demonstrates our continued commitment to achieving a materially lower risk profile in the CRE portfolio, consistent with our overall objective of maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile. The decline in the core segment primarily reflected continued payoffs, partially offset by originations. We continue to support our core developer customers as appropriate. However, new core originations are balanced against internal concentration limits and increased competition, particularly pricing, for high quality developers and projects.

Also, as shown above, substantial reserves for the noncore portfolio have been established. At June 30, 2013, the ACL related to the noncore portfolio was 14.63%. The combination of the existing ACL and prior NCOs represents the total credit actions taken on each segment of the portfolio. From this data, we calculate a credit mark that provides a consistent measurement of the cumulative credit actions taken against a specific portfolio segment. The 38.97% credit mark associated with the SAD-managed noncore portfolio is an indicator of the proactive portfolio management strategy employed for this portfolio.

Consumer Credit

Refer to the “Consumer Credit” section of our 2012 Form 10-K for our consumer credit underwriting and on-going credit management processes.

AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO

Our strategy in the automobile portfolio continued to focus on high quality borrowers as measured by both FICO and internal custom scores, combined with appropriate LTVs, terms, and profitability. Our strategy and operational capabilities allow us to appropriately manage the origination quality across the entire portfolio, including our newer markets. Although increased origination volume and entering new markets can be associated with increased risk levels, we believe our strategy and operational capabilities significantly mitigate these risks.

We have continued to consistently execute our value proposition and take advantage of available market opportunities. Importantly, we have maintained our high credit quality standard while expanding the portfolio. We have developed and implemented a loan securitization strategy to ensure we remain within our established portfolio concentration limits. During the 2013 second quarter, $0.3 billion was transferred from loans held for sale to the automobile portfolio based on our intent and ability to hold these loans for the foreseeable future.

28


Table of Contents

During the 2013 second quarter, we expanded further into New England by entering into the Connecticut market. Consistent with our expansion process, the Connecticut market is managed by seasoned professionals with local market knowledge.

RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE SECURED PORTFOLIOS

The properties securing our residential mortgage and home equity portfolios are primarily located within our geographic footprint. The continued stress on home prices has caused the performance in these portfolios to remain weaker than historical levels. The residential-secured portfolio originations continue to be of high quality, with the majority of the negative credit impact coming from loans originated in 2006 and earlier. We continue to evaluate all of our policies and processes associated with managing these portfolios. Our loss mitigation and foreclosure activities are consolidated in one location under common management. This structure allows us to focus on effectively helping our customers with appropriate solutions for their specific circumstances.

Table 16—Selected Home Equity and Residential Mortgage Portfolio Data

Home Equity Residential Mortgage
Secured by first-lien Secured by junior-lien
(dollar amounts in millions) 06/30/13 12/31/12 06/30/13 12/31/12 06/30/13 12/31/12

Ending balance

$ 4,641 $ 4,380 $ 3,728 $ 3,955 $ 5,168 $ 4,970

Portfolio weighted average LTV ratio (1)

71 % 71 % 81 % 81 % 76 % 76 %

Portfolio weighted average FICO score (2)

759 755 746 741 740 738
Home Equity Residential Mortgage (3)
Secured by first-lien Secured by junior-lien
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012

Originations

$ 952 $ 886 $ 210 $ 302 $ 816 $ 532

Origination weighted average LTV ratio (1)

67 % 72 % 81 % 82 % 78 % 84 %

Origination weighted average FICO score (2)

781 771 756 759 759 754

(1) The LTV ratios for home equity loans and home equity lines-of-credit are cumulative and reflect the balance of any senior loans. LTV ratios reflect collateral values at the time of loan origination.
(2) Portfolio weighted average FICO scores reflect currently updated customer credit scores whereas origination weighted average FICO scores reflect the customer credit scores at the time of loan origination.
(3) Represents only owned-portfolio originations.

Home Equity Portfolio

Our home equity portfolio (loans and lines-of-credit) consists of both first-lien and junior-lien mortgage loans with underwriting criteria based on minimum credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, and LTV ratios. We offer closed-end home equity loans which are generally fixed-rate with principal and interest payments, and variable-rate interest-only home equity lines-of-credit which do not require payment of principal during the 10-year revolving period of the line-of-credit. Applications are underwritten centrally in conjunction with an automated underwriting system.

Given the low interest rate environment over the past several years, many borrowers have utilized the line-of-credit home equity product as the primary source of financing their home versus residential mortgages. The proportion of the home equity portfolio secured by a first-lien has increased significantly over the past three years, positively impacting the portfolio’s risk profile. At June 30, 2013, 55% of our total home equity portfolio was secured by first-lien mortgages. The first-lien position, combined with continued high average FICO scores, significantly reduces the PD associated with these loans.

Within the home equity line-of-credit portfolio, the standard product is a 10-year interest-only draw period with a 20-year fully amortizing term at the end of the draw period. Prior to 2007, the standard product was a 10-year draw period with a balloon payment, while subsequent originations convert to a 20-year amortizing loan structure. After the 10-year draw period, the borrower must reapply to extend the existing structure or begin repaying the debt in a traditional term structure.

29


Table of Contents

The principal and interest payment associated with the term structure will be higher than the interest-only payment, resulting in “maturity” risk. Our maturity risk can be segregated into two distinct segments: (1) home equity lines-of-credit underwritten with a balloon payment at maturity and (2) home equity lines-of-credit with an automatic conversion to a 20-year amortizing loan. We manage this risk based on both the actual maturity date of the line-of-credit structure and at the end of the 10-year draw period. This maturity risk is embedded in the portfolio which we address with proactive contact strategies beginning one year prior to maturity. In certain circumstances, our Home Saver group is able to provide payment and structure relief to borrowers experiencing significant financial hardship associated with the payment adjustment.

The table below summarizes our home equity line-of-credit portfolio by maturity date:

Table 17—Maturity Schedule of Home Equity Line-of-Credit Portfolio

June 30, 2013

(dollar amounts in millions)

1 year or less 1 to 2 years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years More than
4 years
Total

Secured by first-lien

$ 49 $ 58 $ 6 $ $ 2,245 $ 2,358

Secured by junior-lien

268 270 156 136 2,310 3,140

Total home equity line-of-credit

$ 317 $ 328 $ 162 $ 136 $ 4,555 $ 5,498

The amounts in the above table maturing in four years or less primarily consist of balloon payment structures and represent the most significant maturity risk. The amounts maturing in more than four years primarily consist of home equity lines-of-credit with a 20-year amortization period after the 10-year draw period.

Historically, less than 30% of our home equity lines-of-credit that are one year or less from maturity actually reach the maturity date as borrowers apply to re-establish the revolving period under current underwriting standards. We anticipate this percentage will decline in future periods as our proactive approach to managing maturity risk continues to evolve.

Residential Mortgages Portfolio

At June 30, 2013, 46% of our total residential mortgage portfolio were ARMs. These ARMs primarily consist of a fixed-rate of interest for the first 3 to 5 years and then adjust annually. At June 30, 2013, ARM loans that were expected to have rates reset through 2015 totaled $1.4 billion. These loans scheduled to reset are primarily associated with loans originated subsequent to 2007, and as such, are not subject to the most significant declines in underlying property value . Given the quality of our borrowers, the relatively low current interest rates, and the results of our continued analysis (including possible impacts of changes in interest rates), we believe that we have a relatively limited exposure to ARM reset risk. Nonetheless, we have taken actions to mitigate our risk exposure. We initiate borrower contact at least six months prior to the interest rate resetting and have been successful in converting many ARMs to fixed-rate loans through this process. Given the relatively low current interest rates, many fixed-rate products currently offer a better interest rate to our ARM borrowers.

Several government programs continued to impact the residential mortgage portfolio, including various refinance programs such as HARP and HAMP, which positively affected the availability of credit for the industry. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, we closed $360 million in HARP residential mortgages and $5 million in HAMP residential mortgages. The HARP and HAMP residential mortgage loans are part of our residential mortgage portfolio or serviced for others. We are subject to repurchase risk associated with residential mortgage loans sold in the secondary market. An appropriate level of reserve for representations and warranties related to residential mortgage loans sold has been established to address this repurchase risk inherent in the portfolio (see Operational Risk discussion).

Credit Quality

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

We believe the most meaningful way to assess overall credit quality performance is through an analysis of credit quality performance ratios. This approach forms the basis of most of the discussion in the sections immediately following: NPAs and NALs, TDRs, ACL, and NCOs. In addition, we utilize delinquency rates, risk distribution and migration patterns, and product segmentation in the analysis of our credit quality performance.

Credit quality performance in the 2013 second quarter reflected overall continued improvement. Our overall credit quality performance is returning to normalized, pre-recession levels. NALs and NCOs declined 4% and 33%, respectively, compared to the prior quarter. Commercial criticized and commercial classified loans also declined, reflecting the continued improvement in the commercial portfolio. The ACL to total loans ratio declined to 1.86% and our ACL coverage ratios remained at appropriate levels. Our ACL as a percentage of NALs remained strong at 214%. The improvement in the NCO rate was centered in the CRE and home equity portfolios. The remaining portfolios were relatively consistent compared to the prior quarter.

30


Table of Contents

NPAs, NALs, AND TDRs

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

NPAs and NALs

NPAs consist of (1) NALs, which represent loans and leases no longer accruing interest, (2) impaired loans held for sale, (3) OREO properties, and (4) other NPAs. Any loan in our portfolio may be placed on nonaccrual status prior to the policies described below when collection of principal or interest is in doubt. Also, when a borrower with discharged non-reaffirmed debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is identified and the loan is determined to be collateral dependent, the consumer loan is placed on nonaccrual status.

C&I and CRE loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 90-days past due. With the exception of residential mortgage loans guaranteed by government organizations which continue to accrue interest, residential mortgage loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 150-days past due. First-lien home equity loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 150-days past due. Junior-lien home equity loans are placed on nonaccrual status at the earlier of 120-days past due or when the related first-lien loan has been identified as nonaccrual. Automobile and other consumer loans are generally charged-off when the loan is 120-days past due.

When interest accruals are suspended, accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals charged to earnings and prior year amounts generally charged-off as a credit loss. When, in our judgment, the borrower’s ability to make required interest and principal payments has resumed and collectability is no longer in doubt, the loan or lease is returned to accrual status.

31


Table of Contents

The following table reflects period-end NALs and NPAs detail for each of the last five quarters:

Table 18—Nonaccrual Loans and Leases and Nonperforming Assets

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,

Nonaccrual loans and leases:

Commercial and industrial

$ 80,037 $ 80,928 $ 90,705 $ 109,452 $ 133,678

Commercial real estate

93,643 110,803 127,128 148,986 219,417

Automobile

7,743 6,770 7,823 11,814

Residential mortgage

122,040 118,405 122,452 123,140 75,048

Home equity

60,083 63,405 59,525 51,654 46,023

Total nonaccrual loans and leases (1)

363,546 380,311 407,633 445,046 474,166

Other real estate owned, net

Residential

17,353 19,538 21,378 23,640 21,499

Commercial

3,713 5,601 6,719 30,566 17,109

Total other real estate owned, net

21,066 25,139 28,097 54,206 38,608

Other nonperforming assets (2)

12,087 10,045 10,045 10,476 10,476

Total nonperforming assets

$ 396,699 $ 415,495 $ 445,775 $ 509,728 $ 523,250

Nonaccrual loans as a % of total loans and leases

0.87 % 0.92 % 1.00 % 1.11 % 1.19 %

Nonperforming assets ratio (3)

0.95 1.01 1.09 1.26 1.31

(NPA+90days)/(Loan+OREO) (4)

1.38 1.48 1.59 1.75 1.76

(1) Nonaccrual loans and leases related to Chapter 7 bankruptcy loans were $59.6 million, $59.9 million, $60.1 million, and $63.0 million at June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and September 30, 2012, respectively.
(2) Other nonperforming assets includes certain impaired investment securities.
(3) This ratio is calculated as nonperforming assets divided by the sum of loans and leases, other nonperforming assets, and net other real estate owned.
(4) This ratio is calculated as the sum of nonperforming assets and total accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more divided by the sum of loans and leases and net other real estate owned.

The $18.8 million, or 5%, decline in NPAs compared with March 31, 2013, primarily reflected:

$17.2 million, or 15%, decline in CRE NALs, reflecting both NCO activity and problem credit resolutions, including borrower payments and payoffs partially resulting from successful workout strategies implemented by our SAD. Although we anticipate some degree of quarter-to-quarter volatility in our NAL levels, we expect that the overall trend will continue to be lower.

$4.1 million, or 16%, decline in net OREO properties, primarily reflecting strong sale activity.

$3.3 million, or 5%, decrease in home equity NALs, despite significantly lower NCOs. We continue to work with troubled borrowers to take advantage of the current low interest-rate environment and the recent stabilization of home prices. The NAL balances have been written down to collateral value, less anticipated selling costs. This substantially limits any significant future risk of additional loss on these loans and makes a modification more likely for borrowers with consistent cash flow.

Partially offset by:

$3.6 million, or 3%, increase in residential mortgage NALs, primarily associated with a small number of larger problem loans. The NAL balances have been written down to collateral value, less anticipated selling costs. This substantially limits any significant future risk of additional loss on these loans.

Compared with December 31, 2012, NPAs decreased $49.1 million, or 11%, primarily reflecting:

$33.5 million, or 26%, decline in CRE NALs, reflecting both NCO activity and problem credit resolutions, including borrower payments and payoffs partially resulting from successful workout strategies implemented by our SAD. Although we anticipate some degree of quarter-to-quarter volatility in our NAL levels, we expect that the overall trend will continue to be lower.

$10.7 million, or 12%, decline in C&I NALs, reflecting problem credit resolutions, including payoffs partially resulting from successful workout strategies implemented by our SAD. The decline was associated with loans throughout our footprint, with no specific industry concentration.

$7.0 million, or 25%, decrease in OREO, primarily reflecting strong sale activity.

32


Table of Contents

TDR Loans

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

TDRs are modified loans in which a concession is provided to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. TDRs can be classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loans. Nonaccrual TDRs are included in NALs whereas accruing TDRs are excluded from NALs, as it is probable that all contractual principal and interest due under the restructured terms will be collected. TDRs primarily reflect our loss mitigation efforts to proactively work with borrowers having difficulty making their payments.

The table below presents our accruing and nonaccruing TDRs at period-end for each of the past five quarters:

Table 19—Accruing and Nonaccruing Troubled Debt Restructured Loans

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,

Troubled debt restructured loans—accruing:

Commercial and industrial

$ 94,583 $ 90,642 $ 76,586 $ 55,809 $ 57,008

Commercial real estate

184,372 192,167 208,901 222,155 202,190

Automobile

32,768 34,379 35,784 33,719 34,460

Home equity

135,759 162,087 (1) 110,581 92,763 66,997

Residential mortgage

293,933 288,041 290,011 280,890 298,967

Other consumer

3,383 2,514 2,544 2,644 3,038

Total troubled debt restructured loans—accruing

744,798 769,830 724,407 687,980 662,660

Troubled debt restructured loans—nonaccruing:

Commercial and industrial

14,541 14,970 19,268 28,859 35,535

Commercial real estate

26,118 26,588 32,548 20,284 55,022

Automobile

7,743 6,770 7,823 11,814

Home equity

10,227 11,235 6,951 7,756 374

Residential mortgage

80,563 84,317 84,515 83,163 28,332

Other consumer

113 113 113

Total troubled debt restructured loans—nonaccruing

139,192 143,880 151,218 151,989 119,376

Total troubled debt restructured loans

$ 883,990 $ 913,710 $ 875,625 $ 839,969 $ 782,036

(1) Included $43,068 thousand incorrectly reflected as TDRs in the 2013 first quarter.

The increase in the accruing TDR home equity portfolio from the 2012 second quarter is primarily related to the refinancing of certain maturing lines-of-credit structured as a 10-year draw period with a balloon payment to a new loan with a 20-year amortization period. Based on the borrower’s financial condition, we believe the new 20-year amortizing loan would not have been available to the borrower through normal channels or other sources. As such, we view this as a concession and have designated the new loan as a TDR.

Our strategy is to structure commercial TDRs in a manner that avoids new concessions subsequent to the initial TDR terms. However, there are times when subsequent modifications are required, such as when the modified loan matures. Often the loans are performing in accordance with the TDR terms, and a new note is originated with similar modified terms. These loans are subjected to the normal underwriting standards and processes for other similar credit extensions, both new and existing. If the loan is not performing in accordance with the existing TDR terms, typically a more aggressive strategy is put in place. In accordance with ASC 310-20-35, the refinanced note is evaluated to determine if it is considered a new loan or a continuation of the prior loan. A new loan is considered for removal of the TDR designation. A continuation of the prior note requires the continuation of the TDR designation, and because the refinanced note constitutes a new legal agreement, it is included in our TDR activity table (below) as a new TDR and a restructured TDR removal during the period.

The types of concessions granted are consistent with those granted on new TDRs and include interest rate reductions, amortization or maturity date changes beyond what the collateral supports, and principal forgiveness based on the borrower’s specific needs at a point in time. Our policy does not limit the number of times a loan may be modified. A loan may be modified multiple times if it is considered to be in the best interest of both the borrower and us.

33


Table of Contents

Loans are not automatically considered to be accruing TDRs upon the granting of a new concession. If the loan is in accruing status and no loss is expected based on the modified terms, the modified TDR remains in accruing status. For loans that are on nonaccrual status before the modification, collection of both principal and interest must not be in doubt, and the borrower must be able to exhibit sufficient cash flows for a six-month period of time to service the debt in order to return to accruing status. This six-month period could extend before or after the restructure date.

The following table reflects TDR activity for each of the past five quarters:

Table 20—Troubled Debt Restructured Loan Activity

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Second First Fourth Third Second

TDRs, beginning of period

$ 913,710 $ 875,625 $ 839,968 $ 782,035 $ 776,065

New TDRs

115,955 164,407 (2) 169,850 196,707 94,631

Payments

(39,818 ) (44,183 ) (61,491 ) (51,125 ) (38,299 )

Charge-offs

(8,083 ) (5,395 ) (16,985 ) (22,537 ) (16,551 )

Sales

(2,738 ) (4,814 ) (2,933 ) (3,978 ) (1,840 )

Transfer to OREO

(2,453 ) (1,124 ) (3,403 ) (15,974 ) (860 )

Restructured TDRs—accruing (1)

(46,987 ) (53,936 ) (40,682 ) (30,439 ) (20,135 )

Restructured TDRs—nonaccruing (1)

(2,520 ) (10,674 ) (7,138 ) (14,721 ) (10,833 )

Other

(43,076 ) (2) (6,196 ) (1,561 ) (143 )

TDRs, end of period

$ 883,990 $ 913,710 $ 875,625 $ 839,968 $ 782,035

(1) Represents existing TDRs that were re-underwritten with new terms providing a concession. A corresponding amount is included in the New TDRs amount above.
(2) Included a $43,068 thousand reduction of home equity TDRs incorrectly reflected as new TDRs in the 2013 first quarter.

ACL

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

We maintain two reserves, both of which in our judgment are appropriate to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio: the ALLL and the AULC. Combined, these reserves comprise the total ACL. Our Credit Administration group is responsible for developing the methodology assumptions and estimates used in the calculation, as well as determining the appropriateness of the ACL. The ALLL represents the estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the reported date. Additions to the ALLL result from recording provision expense for loan losses or increased risk levels resulting from loan risk-rating downgrades, while reductions reflect charge-offs (net of recoveries), decreased risk levels resulting from loan risk-rating upgrades, or the sale of loans. The AULC is determined by applying the transaction reserve process to the unfunded portion of the loan exposures adjusted by an applicable funding expectation.

A provision for credit losses is recorded to adjust the ACL to the level we have determined to be appropriate to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio. The provision for credit losses in the 2013 second quarter was $24.7 million, compared with $29.6 million in the prior quarter and $36.5 million in the year-ago quarter. The provision for credit losses during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 was $54.3 million, compared with $70.9 million in the comparable year-ago period. (See Provision for Credit Losses discussion).

We regularly evaluate the appropriateness of the ACL by performing on-going evaluations of the loan and lease portfolio, including such factors as the differing economic risks associated with each loan category, the financial condition of specific borrowers, the level of delinquent loans, the value of any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or other documented support. We evaluate the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on the ability of borrowers to meet their financial obligations when quantifying our exposure to credit losses and assessing the appropriateness of our ACL at each reporting date. In addition to general economic conditions and the other factors described above, we also consider the impact of collateral value trends and portfolio diversification.

Our ACL evaluation process includes the on-going assessment of credit quality metrics, and a comparison of certain ACL benchmarks to current performance. While the total ACL balance has declined in recent quarters, all of the relevant benchmarks remain strong.

34


Table of Contents

The table below reflects the allocation of our ACL among our various loan categories during each of the past five quarters:

Table 21—Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses (1)

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,

Commercial

Commercial and industrial

$ 233,679 41 % $ 238,098 42 % $ 241,051 42 % $ 257,081 41 % $ 280,548 41 %

Commercial real estate

255,849 11 267,436 12 285,369 14 280,376 13 305,391 14

Total commercial

489,528 52 505,534 54 526,420 56 537,457 54 585,939 55

Consumer

Automobile

39,990 14 35,973 12 34,979 11 33,281 11 30,217 10

Home equity

115,626 20 115,858 21 118,764 20 122,605 21 135,562 21

Residential mortgage

63,802 12 63,062 12 61,658 12 67,220 13 78,015 13

Other consumer

24,130 2 26,342 1 27,254 1 28,579 1 29,913 1

Total consumer

243,548 48 241,235 46 242,655 44 251,685 46 273,707 45

Total allowance for loan and lease losses

733,076 100 % 746,769 100 % 769,075 100 % 789,142 100 % 859,646 100 %

Allowance for unfunded loan commitments

44,223 40,855 40,651 53,563 50,978

Total allowance for credit losses

$ 777,299 $ 787,624 $ 809,726 $ 842,705 $ 910,624

Total allowance for loan and leases losses as % of:

Total loans and leases

1.76 % 1.81 % 1.89 % 1.96 % 2.15 %

Nonaccrual loans and leases

202 196 189 177 181

Nonperforming assets

185 180 173 155 164

Total allowance for credit losses as % of:

Total loans and leases

1.86 % 1.91 % 1.99 % 2.09 % 2.28 %

Nonaccrual loans and leases

214 207 199 189 192

Nonperforming assets

196 190 182 165 174

(1) Percentages represent the percentage of each loan and lease category to total loans and leases.

The reduction in the ALLL compared with both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, primarily reflected a decline in the CRE portfolio. This decline reflected improvements in the level of Criticized and Classified loans. The consumer portfolio ALLL increased slightly reflecting an increase in the automobile portfolio due entirely to increased ending balances. The underlying asset quality in the automobile portfolio remained strong. This increase was mostly offset by declines in the home equity and other consumer portfolios reflecting improving credit quality.

The ACL to total loans declined to 1.86% at June 30, 2013, compared to 1.99% at December 31, 2012. We believe the decline in the ratio is appropriate given the continued improvement in the risk profile of our loan portfolio. Further, we believe that early identification of loans with changes in credit metrics and aggressive action plans for these loans, combined with originating high quality new loans will contribute to continued improvement in our key credit quality metrics.

We have significant exposure to loans secured by residential real estate and continue to be an active lender in our communities. Recently, real estate values have begun to slowly rise from their 2011 levels. Industry indices, as well as our own view of our primary markets, indicate home prices continued to slowly increase across our primary markets. In aggregate, the housing markets in our footprint states have continued to mirror the national recovery trend.

Given the combination of these noted positive and negative factors, we believe that our ACL is appropriate and its coverage level is reflective of the quality of our portfolio and the current operating environment.

35


Table of Contents

NCOs

Any loan in any portfolio may be charged-off prior to the policies described below if a loss confirming event has occurred. Loss confirming events include, but are not limited to, bankruptcy (unsecured), continued delinquency, foreclosure, or receipt of an asset valuation indicating a collateral deficiency and that asset is the sole source of repayment. Additionally, discharged, collateral dependent non-reaffirmed debt in Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings will result in a charge-off to estimated collateral value, less anticipated selling costs at the time of the modification.

C&I and CRE loans are either charged-off or written down to net realizable value at 90-days past due. Automobile loans and other consumer loans are charged-off at 120-days past due. First-lien and junior-lien home equity loans are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, at 150-days past due and 120-days past due, respectively. Residential mortgages are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, at 150-days past due.

36


Table of Contents

The following table reflects NCO detail for each of the last five quarters:

Table 22—Quarterly Net Charge-off Analysis

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Second First Fourth Third Second

Net charge-offs by loan and lease type:

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

$ 1,586 $ 3,317 $ 7,052 $ 13,023 $ 15,678

Commercial real estate:

Construction

1,079 (798 ) 11,038 (280 ) (1,531 )

Commercial

1,305 13,575 10,333 17,654 30,709

Commercial real estate

2,384 12,777 21,371 17,374 29,178

Total commercial

3,970 16,094 28,423 30,397 44,856

Consumer:

Automobile

1,463 2,594 1,896 4,019 449

Home equity

14,654 19,983 25,013 46,592 21,045

Residential mortgage

8,620 6,148 9,687 16,880 10,786

Other consumer

6,083 6,868 5,111 7,207 7,109

Total consumer

30,820 35,593 41,707 74,698 39,389

Total net charge-offs

$ 34,790 $ 51,687 $ 70,130 $ 105,095 $ 84,245

Net charge-offs—annualized percentages:

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

0.04 % 0.08 % 0.17 % 0.32 % 0.39 %

Commercial real estate:

Construction

0.74 (0.53 ) 7.67 (0.20 ) (1.05 )

Commercial

0.12 1.16 0.84 1.37 2.24

Commercial real estate

0.19 0.97 1.56 1.21 1.92

Total commercial

0.07 0.29 0.52 0.55 0.81

Consumer:

Automobile

0.11 0.21 0.17 0.40 0.04

Home equity

0.71 0.95 1.20 2.23 1.01

Residential mortgage

0.66 0.49 0.75 1.30 0.82

Other consumer

5.29 6.67 4.74 6.49 6.15

Total consumer

0.64 0.76 0.91 1.65 0.83

Net charge-offs as a % of average loans

0.34 % 0.51 % 0.69 % 1.05 % 0.82 %

In assessing NCO trends, it is helpful to understand the process of how commercial loans are treated as they deteriorate over time. The ALLL established is consistent with the level of risk associated with the original underwriting. As a part of our normal portfolio management process for commercial loans, the loan is periodically reviewed and the ALLL is increased or decreased based on the revised risk rating. In certain cases, the standard ALLL is determined to not be appropriate, and a specific reserve is established based on the projected cash flow or collateral value of the specific loan. Charge-offs, if necessary, are generally recognized in a period after the specific ALLL was established. If the previously established ALLL exceeds that necessary to satisfactorily resolve the problem loan, a reduction in the overall level of the ALLL could be recognized. Consumer loans are treated in much the same manner as commercial loans, with increasing reserve factors applied based on the risk characteristics of the loan, although specific reserves are not identified for consumer loans. In summary, if loan quality deteriorates, the typical credit sequence would be periods of reserve building, followed by periods of higher NCOs as the previously established ALLL is utilized. Additionally, an increase in the ALLL either precedes or is in conjunction with increases in NALs. When a loan is classified as NAL, it is evaluated for specific ALLL or charge-off. As a result, an increase in NALs does not necessarily result in an increase in the ALLL or an expectation of higher future NCOs.

Our overall NCOs are returning to pre-recession levels, however, we anticipate NCO levels for both the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios will remain at elevated levels in the near future. The home equity portfolio will continue to be impacted by borrowers that are seeking to refinance, but are in a negative equity position because of the junior-lien loan. Right-sizing and debt forgiveness associated with these situations are becoming more frequent as borrowers realize the impact to their credit is minor, and that a default on a junior-lien loan is not likely to cause borrowers to lose their home.

All residential mortgage loans greater than 150-days past due are charged-down to the estimated value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs. The remaining balance is in delinquent status until a modification can be completed, or the loan goes through the foreclosure process. For the home equity portfolio, virtually all of the defaults represent full charge-offs, as there is no remaining equity, creating a lower delinquency rate but a higher NCO impact.

37


Table of Contents

2013 Second Quarter versus 2013 First Quarter

C&I NCOs decreased $1.7 million, or 52%, primarily reflecting higher recoveries from prior charge-offs. Current quarter NCOs did not represent any specific concentration in either geography or project type. Given the relatively low absolute level of NCOs in this portfolio, some degree of volatility on a quarter-to-quarter basis is expected.

CRE NCOs decreased $10.4 million, or 81%, reflecting significant recoveries in the current quarter, as well as lower charge-off activity. As with the C&I portfolio, given the low absolute level of NCOs in the portfolio, some degree of volatility on a quarter-to-quarter basis is expected.

Automobile NCOs decreased $1.1 million, or 44%, consistent with our expectations for the portfolio. The relatively low levels of NCOs reflected the continued high credit quality of originations and a strong resale market for used automobiles. We anticipate continued strength in the used automobile market for the remainder of 2013.

Residential mortgage NCOs increased $2.5 million, or 40%, reflecting large dollar NCO activity on a small number of loans. We do not believe the increase to be a reversal of the positive trends experienced in the portfolio over the past year. As the absolute level of NCOs continues to decline, the portfolio will be subject to some degree of volatility on a quarter-to-quarter basis.

Home equity NCOs decreased $5.3 million, or 27%, primarily reflecting improved delinquencies and the continued migration toward higher quality borrowers and improved loan structures. Additionally, the continued improvement in the underlying mortgage market and rising home prices had a positive impact.

38


Table of Contents

The table below reflects NCO activity for the first six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Table 23—Year to Date Net Charge-off Analysis

Six Months Ended June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Net charge-offs by loan and lease type:

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

$ 4,903 $ 44,173

Commercial real estate:

Construction

281 (2,717 )

Commercial

14,880 42,401

Commercial real estate

15,161 39,684

Total commercial

20,064 83,857

Consumer:

Automobile

4,057 3,527

Home equity

34,637 44,774

Residential mortgage

14,768 21,356

Other consumer

12,951 13,723

Total consumer

66,413 83,380

Total net charge-offs

$ 86,477 $ 167,237

Net charge-offs—annualized percentages:

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial

0.06 % 0.57 %

Commercial real estate:

Construction

0.09 (0.92 )

Commercial

0.65 1.58

Commercial real estate

0.59 1.33

Total commercial

0.18 0.78

Consumer:

Automobile

0.16 0.15

Home equity

0.84 1.08

Residential mortgage

0.58 0.82

Other consumer

5.31 5.80

Total consumer

0.70 0.89

Net charge-offs as a % of average loans

0.42 % 0.83 %

2013 First Six Months versus 2012 First Six Months

C&I NCOs decreased $39.3 million, or 89%, primarily reflecting credit quality improvement in the underlying portfolio, as well as our on-going proactive credit management practices. Also, the first six-month period of 2013 reflected higher recoveries from prior charge-offs.

CRE NCOs decreased $24.5 million, or 62%, reflecting significant recoveries during the first six-month period of 2013. This performance is consistent with our expectations for the portfolio, as some degree of quarterly volatility is expected given the low absolute levels of NCOs in the portfolio. There was no concentration in either geography or project type, and the NCOs were generally associated with small relationships.

Automobile NCOs increased $0.5 million, or 15%. The relatively low levels of NCOs reflected the continued high credit quality of originations and a strong resale market for used vehicles.

Home equity NCOs decreased $10.1 million, or 23%, primarily reflecting improved delinquency rates and fewer significant dollar size losses compared to the year-ago period. The performance of the portfolio is consistent with our expectations.

Residential mortgage NCOs declined $6.6 million, or 31%, and reflected improvement in the overall economy compared to the year-ago period.

39


Table of Contents

Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of loss due to changes in market values of assets and liabilities. We incur market risk in the normal course of business through exposures to market interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, and credit spreads. We have identified two primary sources of market risk: interest rate risk and price risk.

Interest Rate Risk

OVERVIEW

Huntington actively manages interest rate risk, as changes in market interest rates can have a significant impact on reported earnings. The interest rate risk process is designed to compare income simulations in market scenarios designed to alter the direction, magnitude, and speed of interest rate changes, as well as the slope of the yield curve. These scenarios are designed to illustrate the embedded optionality in the balance sheet from, among other things, faster or slower mortgage prepayments and changes in deposit mix.

INCOME SIMULATION AND ECONOMIC VALUE ANALYSIS

Interest rate risk measurement is calculated and reported to the ALCO monthly and ROC at least quarterly. The information reported includes period-end results and identifies any policy limits exceeded, along with an assessment of the policy limit breach and the action plan and timeline for resolution, mitigation, or assumption of the risk.

Huntington uses two approaches to model interest rate risk: Interest Sensitive Earnings at Risk (ISE analysis) and Economic Value of Equity (EVE analysis). Under ISE analysis, net interest income is modeled utilizing various assumptions for assets, liabilities, and derivative positions under various interest rate scenarios over a one year time horizon. Market implied forward rates and various likely and extreme interest rate scenarios are used for ISE analysis. These likely and extreme scenarios include rapid and gradual interest rate ramps, rate shocks and yield curve twists.

The ISE analysis used in the following table reflects the analysis used monthly by management. It models gradual -25, +100 and +200 basis point parallel shifts in market interest rates over the next one-year period, beyond the interest rate change implied by the forward yield curve. Due to the current low level of short-term interest rates, the analysis reflects a declining interest rate scenario of 25 basis points, the point at which many assets and liabilities reach zero percent.

Huntington is within Board policy limits for the +100 and +200 basis point scenarios. There is no policy limit for the -25 basis point scenario. The table below shows the results of the scenario as of June 30, 2013:

Table 24—Interest Sensitive Earnings at Risk

Interest Sensitive Earnings at Risk (%)

Basis point change scenario

-25 +100 +200

Board policy limits

-2.0 % -4.0 %

June 30, 2013

-0.5 1.7 3.1

The ISE at risk reported at June 30, 2013, shows that Huntington is asset sensitive, meaning that earnings increase (decrease) when rates rise (fall). The primary reason for these results is that more assets (primarily LIBOR-indexed loans to customers) than liabilities (primarily non-maturity deposits) will reprice over the modeled one-year period. Compared to recent periods, the ISE results for June 30, 2013 reflect higher market rates. The primary impact of higher rates is to slow prepayments on mortgage-related assets, which extends their lives. The impact to ISE from recent higher rate movement has been minimal due to short term rates remaining relatively unchanged. This impact notwithstanding, these results are very similar to those at year-end 2012.

The following table shows the income sensitivity of selected assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. The table compares the ISE analysis for selected Huntington portfolios to a portfolio that assumes 100% sensitivity to changes in interest rates. We calculate the percent change in interest income/expense as the change in the base Huntington portfolio divided by the change in the 100% sensitive portfolio.

The results for the +100 and +200 basis point ramps also confirm the asset sensitive nature of the portfolio. In both the +100 and +200 basis point ramps, interest income for total loans (37.0% and 37.9%, respectively) increases faster than interest expense for interest bearing deposits (33.6% and 35.5%, respectively). Additionally, while this analysis reflects that total interest-sensitive income reprices slower than total interest-sensitive expense for both +100 and +200 basis point ramps, it does not include the impact of non-interest-sensitive items, like demand deposits and equity, that will enhance asset sensitivity. The -25 basis point parallel ramp also confirms the asset sensitive position as the interest income for total loans (-9.6%), decreases faster than the interest expense of deposits (-7.5%).

40


Table of Contents

Table 25—Interest Income/Expense Sensitivity

Percent of
Total Earning
Assets (1)
Percent Change in Interest Income/Expense
For a Given Change  in Interest
Rates Over / (Under) Base Case Parallel Ramp

Basis point change scenario

-25 +100 +200

Total loans

81 % -9.6 % 37.0 % 37.9 %

Total investments and other earning assets

19 -3.8 26.1 18.6

Total interest-sensitive income

-8.4 34.5 34.0

Total interest-bearing deposits

64 -7.5 33.6 35.5

Total borrowings

5 -9.1 54.3 54.7

Total interest-sensitive expense

-7.6 35.3 36.1

(1) At June 30, 2013

The EVE analysis measures the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, and the change in this equity value as rates change. Management focuses on the -25, +100, and +200 basis point shock scenarios.

The EVE analysis used in the following table reflects the analysis used monthly by management. It models immediate -25, +100 and +200 basis point parallel shifts in market interest rates. Due to the current low level of short-term interest rates, the analysis reflects a declining interest rate scenario of 25 basis points, the point at which many assets and liabilities reach zero percent.

Huntington is within Board policy limits for the +100 and +200 basis point scenarios. There is no policy limit for the -25 basis point scenario. The table below shows the results of the scenario as of June 30, 2013:

Table 26—Economic Value of Equity at Risk

Economic Value of Equity at Risk (%)

Basis point change scenario

-25 +100 +200

Board policy limits

-5.0 % -12.0 %

June 30, 2013

0.9 -4.9 -10.6

The EVE at risk reported at June 30, 2013 shows that as interest rates increase (decrease) immediately, the economic value of equity position will decrease (increase) since the amount and duration of the assets are longer than the amount and duration of liabilities. When interest rates rise, fixed rate assets generally lose economic value; the longer the duration, the greater the value lost. The opposite is true when interest rates fall.

Compared to recent periods, the EVE results for June 30, 2013 reflect higher market rates. The primary impact of higher rates is to slow prepayments on mortgage-related assets, which extends their lives. As a result of this extension, and the decline in the value of fixed income securities as rates rise, these EVE results show more liability sensitivity than those at December 31, 2012.

The following table details the economic value sensitivity to changes in market interest rates at June 30, 2013 for loans, investments, deposits, and borrowings. The change in economic value for each portfolio is measured as the percent change from the base economic value for that portfolio. The analysis reflects that, in a sharply higher rate scenario, total tangible assets are more sensitive than total tangible liabilities. Investments and other earning assets contribute to this sensitivity, largely due to fixed rate securities investments.

41


Table of Contents

Table 27—Economic Value Sensitivity

Percent of
Total Net
Tangible
Assets (1)
Percent Change in Economic Value
For a Given Change in  Interest Rates
Over / (Under) Base Case Parallel Shocks

Basis point change scenario

-25 +100 +200

Total loans

75 % 0.4 % -1.7 % -3.4 %

Total investments and other earning assets

17 0.9 -4.0 -8.0

Total net tangible assets (2)

0.5 -2.1 -4.1

Total deposits

83 -0.4 1.7 3.2

Total borrowings

5 -0.1 0.4 0.8

Total net tangible liabilities (3)

-0.4 1.6 3.0

(1) At June 30, 2013.
(2) Tangible assets excluding ALLL.
(3) Tangible liabilities excluding AULC.

MSRs

(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 6 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)

At June 30, 2013 we had a total of $155.5 million of capitalized MSRs representing the right to service $15.2 billion in mortgage loans. Of this $155.5 million, $37.5 million was recorded using the fair value method and $118.0 million was recorded using the amortization method.

MSR fair values are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans, which can be greatly reduced by prepayments. Prepayments usually increase when mortgage interest rates decline and decrease when mortgage interest rates rise. We have employed strategies to reduce the risk of MSR fair value changes or impairment. In addition, we engage a third party to provide valuation tools and assistance with our strategies with the objective to decrease the volatility from MSR fair value changes. However, volatile changes in interest rates can diminish the effectiveness of these hedges. We typically report MSR fair value adjustments net of hedge-related trading activity in the mortgage banking income category of noninterest income. Changes in fair value between reporting dates are recorded as an increase or a decrease in mortgage banking income.

MSRs recorded using the amortization method generally relate to loans originated with historically low interest rates, resulting in a lower probability of prepayments and, ultimately, impairment. MSR assets are included in accrued income and other assets in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Price Risk

Price risk represents the risk of loss arising from adverse movements in the prices of financial instruments that are carried at fair value and are subject to fair value accounting. We have price risk from trading securities, securities owned by our broker-dealer subsidiaries, foreign exchange positions, equity investments, investments in securities backed by mortgage loans, and marketable equity securities held by our insurance subsidiaries. We have established loss limits on the trading portfolio, on the amount of foreign exchange exposure that can be maintained, and on the amount of marketable equity securities that can be held by the insurance subsidiaries.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk of loss due to the possibility that funds may not be available to satisfy current or future commitments resulting from external macro market issues, investor and customer perception of financial strength, and events unrelated to us, such as war, terrorism, or financial institution market specific issues. In addition, the mix and maturity structure of Huntington’s balance sheet, the amount of on-hand cash and unencumbered securities, and the availability of contingent sources of funding can have an impact on Huntington’s ability to satisfy current or future funding commitments. We manage liquidity risk at both the Bank and the parent company.

The overall objective of liquidity risk management is to ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations, and can maintain sufficient levels of on-hand liquidity, under both normal business-as-usual and unanticipated stressed circumstances. The ALCO was appointed by the ROC to oversee liquidity risk management and the establishment of liquidity risk policies and limits. Contingency funding plans are in place, which measure forecasted sources and uses of funds under various scenarios in order to prepare for unexpected liquidity shortages. Liquidity risk is reviewed monthly for the Bank and the parent company, as well as its subsidiaries. In addition, liquidity working groups meet regularly to identify and monitor liquidity positions, provide policy guidance, review funding strategies, and oversee the adherence to, and maintenance of, the contingency funding plans.

42


Table of Contents

Investment securities portfolio

The expected weighted average maturities of our AFS and HTM portfolios are significantly shorter than their contractual maturities as reflected in Note 4 and Note 5 of the Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Particularly regarding the MBS and ABS, prepayments of principal and interest that historically occur in advance of scheduled maturities will shorten the expected life of these portfolios. The expected weighted average maturities, which take into account expected prepayments of principal and interest under existing interest rate conditions, are shown in the following table:

Table 28—Expected life of investment securities

June 30, 2013
Available-for-Sale & Other Held-to-Maturity
Securities Securities
Amortized Fair Amortized Fair

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Cost Value Cost Value

Under 1 year

$ 383,136 $ 385,591 $ $

1 - 5 years

3,986,629 4,050,384 407,561 408,431

6 - 10 years

1,791,179 1,758,362 1,548,533 1,540,435

Over 10 years

375,618 286,303 216,135 217,883

Other securities

334,568 335,018

Total

$ 6,871,130 $ 6,815,658 $ 2,172,229 $ 2,166,749

Bank Liquidity and Sources of Liquidity

Our primary sources of funding for the Bank are retail and commercial core deposits. At June 30, 2013, these core deposits funded 78% of total assets (105% of total loans). At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, total core deposits represented 95% of total deposits.

Core deposits are comprised of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand deposits, money market deposits, savings and other domestic deposits, consumer certificates of deposit both over and under $250,000, and nonconsumer certificates of deposit less than $250,000. Noncore deposits consist of brokered money market deposits and certificates of deposit, foreign time deposits, and other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more comprised primarily of public fund certificates of deposit greater than $250,000.

Core deposits may increase our need for liquidity as certificates of deposit mature or are withdrawn before maturity and as nonmaturity deposits, such as checking and savings account balances, are withdrawn. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $0.9 billion from December 31, 2012, but include certain large commercial deposits that may be more short-term in nature.

Demand deposit overdrafts that have been reclassified as loan balances were $17.7 million and $17.2 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more and brokered deposits and negotiable CDs totaled $2.0 billion and $1.9 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

43


Table of Contents

The following tables reflect deposit composition and short-term borrowings detail for each of the last five quarters:

Table 29—Deposit Composition

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,

By Type

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 13,491 29 % $ 12,757 27 % $ 12,600 27 % $ 12,680 27 % $ 12,324 27 %

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

5,977 13 6,135 13 6,218 13 5,909 13 6,060 13

Money market deposits

15,131 33 15,165 32 14,691 32 14,926 32 13,756 30

Savings and other domestic deposits

5,054 11 5,174 11 5,002 11 4,949 11 4,961 11

Core certificates of deposit

4,353 9 5,170 11 5,516 12 5,817 12 6,508 14

Total core deposits

44,006 95 44,401 94 44,027 95 44,281 95 43,609 95

Other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more

283 1 355 1 354 1 352 1 260 1

Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs

1,695 4 1,807 4 1,594 3 1,795 4 1,888 4

Deposits in foreign offices

347 304 1 278 1 313 319

Total deposits

$ 46,331 100 % $ 46,867 100 % $ 46,253 100 % $ 46,741 100 % $ 46,076 100 %

Total core deposits:

Commercial

$ 18,922 43 % $ 18,502 42 % $ 18,358 42 % $ 19,207 43 % $ 18,324 42 %

Consumer

25,084 57 25,899 58 25,669 58 25,074 57 25,285 58

Total core deposits

$ 44,006 100 % $ 44,401 100 % $ 44,027 100 % $ 44,281 100 % $ 43,609 100 %

Table 30—Federal Funds Purchased and Repurchase Agreements

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,

Balance at period-end

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 627 $ 725 $ 576 $ 1,249 $ 1,191

Other short-term borrowings

3 8 14 11 15

Weighted average interest rate at period-end

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

0.09 % 0.09 % 0.15 % 0.14 % 0.19 %

Other short-term borrowings

3.63 2.50 1.98 1.99 1.57

Maximum amount outstanding at month-end during the period

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 757 $ 781 $ 1,166 $ 1,464 $ 1,286

Other short-term borrowings

10 9 26 16 26

Average amount outstanding during the period

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 693 $ 752 $ 996 $ 1,315 $ 1,365

Other short-term borrowings

9 10 16 15 26

Weighted average interest rate during the period

Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

0.08 % 0.10 % 0.12 % 0.15 % 0.15 %

Other short-term borrowings

1.91 2.13 1.52 1.67 0.92

To the extent we are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, we may meet our liquidity needs through sources of wholesale funding or asset securitization or sale. Sources of wholesale funding include other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more, brokered deposits and negotiable CDs, deposits in foreign offices, short-term borrowings, FHLB advances, other long-term debt, and subordinated notes. At June 30, 2013, total wholesale funding was $5.2 billion, unchanged from $5.2 billion at December 31, 2012.

44


Table of Contents

The Bank also has access to the Federal Reserve’s discount window. These borrowings are secured by commercial loans and home equity lines-of-credit. The Bank is also a member of the FHLB, and as such, has access to advances from this facility. These advances are generally secured by residential mortgages, other mortgage-related loans, and available-for-sale securities. Information regarding amounts pledged, for the ability to borrow if necessary, and the unused borrowing capacity at both the Federal Reserve Bank and the FHLB, is outlined in the following table:

Table 31—Federal Reserve and FHLB Borrowing Capacity

June 30, December 31,

(dollar amounts in billions)

2013 2012

Loans and securities pledged:

Federal Reserve Bank

$ 10.5 $ 10.2

FHLB

8.3 8.2

Total loans and securities pledged

$ 18.8 $ 18.4

Total unused borrowing capacity at Federal Reserve Bank and FHLB

$ 10.7 $ 10.3

At June 30, 2013, we believe the Bank had sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations for the foreseeable future.

Parent Company Liquidity

The parent company’s funding requirements consist primarily of dividends to shareholders, debt service, income taxes, operating expenses, funding of nonbank subsidiaries, repurchases of our stock, and acquisitions. The parent company obtains funding to meet obligations from interest received from the Bank, interest and dividends received from direct subsidiaries, net taxes collected from subsidiaries included in the federal consolidated tax return, fees for services provided to subsidiaries, and the issuance of debt securities.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the parent company had $0.9 billion, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents.

On July 18, 2013, we announced that the board of directors had declared a quarterly common stock cash dividend of $0.05 per common share. The dividend is payable on October 1, 2013, to shareholders of record on September 17, 2013. Based on the current quarterly dividend of $0.05 per common share, cash demands required for common stock dividends are estimated to be approximately $41.5 million per quarter. Based on the current dividend, cash demands required for Series A Preferred Stock are estimated to be approximately $7.7 million per quarter. Cash demands required for Series B Preferred Stock are expected to be approximately $0.3 million per quarter.

Based on a regulatory dividend limitation, the Bank could not have declared and paid a dividend to the parent company at June 30, 2013, without regulatory approval due to the deficit position of its undivided profits. We do not anticipate that the Bank will need to pay dividends in the near future as we continue to build Bank regulatory capital above its already well-capitalized level. To help meet any additional liquidity needs, we have an open-ended, automatic shelf registration statement filed and effective with the SEC, which permits us to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity securities.

With the exception of the items discussed above, the parent company does not have any significant cash demands. It is our policy to keep operating cash on hand at the parent company to satisfy cash demands for the next 18 months.

Basel III includes short-term liquidity (Liquidity Coverage Ratio) and long-term funding (Net Stable Funding Ratio) standards. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio, or LCR, is designed to ensure that banking organizations maintain an adequate level of cash, or assets that can readily be converted to cash, to meet potential short-term liquidity needs. The Net Stable Funding Ratio is designed to promote a stable maturity structure of assets and liabilities of banking organizations over a one-year time horizon. These requirements are subject to change by our banking regulators.

Considering the factors discussed above, and other analyses that we have performed, we believe the parent company has sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations for the foreseeable future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of business, we enter into various off-balance sheet arrangements. These arrangements include financial guarantees contained in standby letters-of-credit issued by the Bank and commitments by the Bank to sell mortgage loans.

Standby letters-of-credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. Most of these arrangements mature within two years and are expected to expire without being drawn upon. Standby letters-of-credit are included in the determination of the amount of risk-based capital that the parent company and the Bank are required to hold.

45


Table of Contents

Through our credit process, we monitor the credit risks of outstanding standby letters-of-credit. When it is probable that a standby letter-of-credit will be drawn and not repaid in full, a loss is recognized in the provision for credit losses. At June 30, 2013, we had $457.7 million of standby letters-of-credit outstanding, of which 81% were collateralized. Included in this $457.7 million are letters-of-credit issued by the Bank that support securities that were issued by our customers and remarketed by The Huntington Investment Company, our broker-dealer subsidiary.

We enter into forward contracts relating to the mortgage banking business to hedge the exposures we have from commitments to extend new residential mortgage loans to our customers and from our mortgage loans held for sale. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had commitments to sell residential real estate loans of $745.4 million and $849.8 million, respectively. These contracts mature in less than one year.

We do not believe that off-balance sheet arrangements will have a material impact on our liquidity or capital resources.

Operational Risk

As with all companies, we are subject to operational risk. Operational risk is the risk of loss due to human error; inadequate or failed internal systems and controls; violations of, or noncompliance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, or ethical standards; and external influences such as market conditions, fraudulent activities, disasters, and security risks. We continuously strive to strengthen our system of internal controls to ensure compliance with laws, rules, and regulations, and to improve the oversight of our operational risk. For example, we actively and continuously monitor cyber-attacks such as attempts related to eFraud and loss of sensitive customer data. We evaluate internal systems, processes and controls to mitigate loss from cyber-attacks and, to date, have not experienced any material losses.

To mitigate operational risks, we have established a senior management Operational Risk Committee and a senior management Legal, Regulatory, and Compliance Committee. The responsibilities of these committees, among other duties, include establishing and maintaining management information systems to monitor material risks and to identify potential concerns, risks, or trends that may have a significant impact and ensuring that recommendations are developed to address the identified issues. Both of these committees report any significant findings and recommendations to the Risk Management Committee. Additionally, potential concerns may be escalated to our ROC, as appropriate.

The goal of this framework is to implement effective operational risk techniques and strategies, minimize operational and fraud losses, and enhance our overall performance.

Representation and Warranty Reserve

We primarily conduct our mortgage loan sale and securitization activity with FNMA and FHLMC. In connection with these and other securitization transactions, we make certain representations and warranties that the loans meet certain criteria, such as collateral type and underwriting standards. We may be required to repurchase individual loans and / or indemnify these organizations against losses due to a loan not meeting the established criteria. We have a reserve for such losses, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities. The reserves are estimated based on historical and expected repurchase activity, average loss rates, and current economic trends. The level of mortgage loan repurchase losses depends upon economic factors, investor demand strategies and other external conditions containing a level of uncertainty and risk that may change over the life of the underlying loans. We currently do not have sufficient information to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss related to representation and warranty exposure.

The table below reflects activity in the representations and warranties reserve:

Table 32—Summary of Reserve for Representations and Warranties on Mortgage Loans Serviced for Others

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Second First Fourth Third Second

Reserve for representations and warranties, beginning of period

$ 28,932 $ 28,588 $ 27,468 $ 26,298 $ 24,802

Reserve charges

(1,531 ) (2,470 ) (3,062 ) (2,833 ) (2,677 )

Provision for representations and warranties

638 2,814 4,182 4,003 4,173

Reserve for representations and warranties, end of period

$ 28,039 $ 28,932 $ 28,588 $ 27,468 $ 26,298

46


Table of Contents

Table 33—Mortgage Loan Repurchase Statistics

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Second First Fourth Third Second

Number of loans sold

5,747 5,798 7,696 6,093 5,935

Amount of loans sold (UPB)

$ 921,458 $ 846,419 $ 1,124,286 $ 992,310 $ 890,592

Number of loans repurchased (1)

32 46 79 44 55

Amount of loans repurchased (UPB) (1)

$ 2,969 $ 5,874 $ 9,563 $ 5,721 $ 8,998

Number of claims received

71 146 166 139 227

Successful dispute rate (2)

45 % 62 % 45 % 44 % 48 %

Number of make whole payments (3)

19 29 48 39 47

Amount of make whole payments (3)

$ 1,304 $ 2,274 $ 2,876 $ 2,815 $ 2,130

(1)

Loans repurchased are loans that fail to meet the purchaser’s terms.

(2)

Successful disputes are a percent of close out requests.

(3)

Make whole payments are payments to reimburse for losses on foreclosed properties.

Foreclosure Documentation

Compared to the high volume servicers, we service a relatively low volume of residential mortgage foreclosures. We have reviewed our residential foreclosure process. We have not found evidence of financial injury to any borrowers from any foreclosure by the Bank that should not have proceeded. We continuously review our processes and controls to ensure that our foreclosure processes are appropriate.

Compliance Risk

Financial institutions are subject to several laws, rules, and regulations at both the federal and state levels. These broad-based mandates include, but are not limited to, expectations relating to anti-money laundering, lending limits, client privacy, fair lending, and community reinvestment. Additionally, the volume and complexity of recent regulatory changes have increased our overall compliance risk. As such, we utilize various resources to help ensure expectations are met, including a team of compliance experts dedicated to ensuring our conformance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Our colleagues receive training for several broad-based laws and regulations including, but not limited to, anti-money laundering and customer privacy. Additionally, colleagues engaged in lending activities receive training for laws and regulations related to flood disaster protection, equal credit opportunity, fair lending, and / or other courses related to the extension of credit. We set a high standard of expectation for adherence to compliance management and seek to continuously enhance our performance.

Capital

Both regulatory capital and shareholders’ equity are managed at the Bank and on a consolidated basis. We have an active program for managing capital and maintain a comprehensive process for assessing the Company’s overall capital adequacy. We believe our current levels of both regulatory capital and shareholders’ equity are adequate.

Regulatory Capital

Basel III and the Dodd-Frank Act

On July 2, 2013, the FRB voted to adopt final Basel III Capital rules for U.S. banking organizations. The final rules establish an integrated regulatory capital framework and will implement in the United States the Basel III regulatory capital reforms from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. Under the final rule, minimum requirements will increase for both the quantity and quality of capital held by banking organizations. Consistent with the international Basel framework, the final rule includes a new minimum ratio of common equity tier 1 capital (Tier I Common) to risk-weighted assets and a common equity tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent of risk-weighted assets that will apply to all supervised financial institutions. The rule also raises the minimum ratio of tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and includes a minimum leverage ratio of 4 percent for all banking organizations. These new minimum capital ratios will become effective for us on January 1, 2015 and will be fully phased-in on January 1, 2019.

47


Table of Contents

The final rule emphasizes common equity tier 1 capital, the most loss-absorbing form of capital, and implements strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments. The final rule also improves the methodology for calculating risk-weighted assets to enhance risk sensitivity. Banks and regulators use risk weighting to assign different levels of risk to different classes of assets.

We have evaluated the impact of the Basel III final rule on our regulatory capital ratios and estimate a reduction of approximately 60 basis points to our Basel I Tier I Common risk-based capital ratio based on our June 30, 2013 balance sheet composition. This estimate is based on management’s current understanding, expectation, and understanding of the final U.S. Basel III rules. We anticipate that our capital ratios, on a Basel III basis, will continue to exceed the well-capitalized minimum requirements. We are evaluating options to mitigate the capital impact of the final rule prior to its effective implementation date.

Capital Planning

In 2012, we participated in the FRB’s CapPR process and made our capital plan submission in January 2013. On March 14, 2013, we announced that the FRB had completed its review of our capital plan submission and did not object to our proposed capital actions. The planned actions included the potential repurchase of up to $227.0 million of common stock and an increase of our common per share dividend from $0.04 to $0.05 through the 2014 first quarter.

Beginning with our Capital Plan submission in January 2014, we will be subject to the FRB’s CCAR process. One of the primary additional elements of CCAR will be supervisory stress tests conducted by the FRB under different hypothetical macro-economic scenarios in addition to the stress tests routinely conducted by management. After completing its review, the FRB may object or not object to our proposed capital actions, such as plans to pay or increase common stock dividends or increase common stock repurchase programs. Beginning with our January 2014 submission, we will also be subject to the OCC’s Annual Stress Test at the bank-level. The OCC stipulated that it will consult closely with the FRB to provide common stress scenarios which can be used at both the depository institution and bank holding company levels.

Capital Adequacy

The FRB establishes capital adequacy requirements, including well-capitalized standards for the Company. The OCC establishes similar capital adequacy requirements and standards for the Bank. Regulatory capital primarily consists of Tier 1 risk-based capital and Tier 2 risk-based capital. The sum of Tier 1 risk-based capital and Tier 2 risk-based capital equals our total risk-based capital.

Risk-based capital guidelines require a minimum level of capital as a percentage of “risk-weighted assets”. Risk-weighted assets consist of total assets plus certain off-balance sheet and market items, subject to adjustment for predefined credit risk factors. At June 30, 2013, both the Company and the Bank were well-capitalized under applicable regulatory capital adequacy guidelines.

Tier 1 common equity, a non-GAAP financial measure, is used by banking regulators, investors and analysts to assess and compare the quality and composition of our capital with the capital of other financial services companies. We use Tier 1 common equity, along with the other capital measures, to assess and monitor our capital position. Tier 1 common equity is defined as Tier 1 capital less elements of Tier 1 capital not in the form of common equity (e.g. perpetual preferred stock, noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries, and trust preferred capital debt securities).

48


Table of Contents

The following table presents risk-weighted assets and other financial data necessary to calculate certain financial ratios, including the Tier 1 common equity ratio, which we use to measure capital adequacy:

Table 34—Capital Adequacy

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,

Consolidated capital calculations:

Common shareholders’ equity

$ 5,398 $ 5,481 $ 5,404 $ 5,422 $ 5,263

Preferred shareholders’ equity

386 386 386 386 386

Total shareholders’ equity

5,784 5,867 5,790 5,808 5,649

Goodwill

(444 ) (444 ) (444 ) (444 ) (444 )

Other intangible assets

(114 ) (124 ) (132 ) (144 ) (159 )

Other intangible assets deferred tax liability (1)

40 43 46 50 56

Total tangible equity (2)

5,266 5,342 5,260 5,270 5,102

Preferred shareholders’ equity

(386 ) (386 ) (386 ) (386 ) (386 )

Total tangible common equity (2)

$ 4,880 $ 4,956 $ 4,874 $ 4,884 $ 4,716

Total assets

$ 56,114 $ 56,055 $ 56,153 $ 56,443 $ 56,623

Goodwill

(444 ) (444 ) (444 ) (444 ) (444 )

Other intangible assets

(114 ) (124 ) (132 ) (144 ) (159 )

Other intangible assets deferred tax liability (1)

40 43 46 50 56

Total tangible assets (2)

$ 55,596 $ 55,530 $ 55,623 $ 55,905 $ 56,076

Tier 1 capital

$ 5,885 $ 5,829 $ 5,741 $ 5,720 $ 5,714

Preferred shareholders’ equity

(386 ) (386 ) (386 ) (386 ) (386 )

Trust preferred securities

(299 ) (299 ) (299 ) (335 ) (449 )

REIT preferred stock

(50 ) (50 ) (50 ) (50 ) (50 )

Tier 1 common equity (2)

$ 5,150 $ 5,094 $ 5,006 $ 4,949 $ 4,829

Risk-weighted assets (RWA)

$ 48,080 $ 47,937 $ 47,773 $ 48,147 $ 47,890

Tier 1 common equity / RWA ratio (2)

10.71 % 10.62 % 10.48 % 10.28 % 10.08 %

Tangible equity / tangible asset ratio (2)

9.47 9.62 9.46 9.43 9.10

Tangible common equity / tangible asset ratio (2)

8.78 8.92 8.76 8.74 8.41

Tangible common equity / RWA ratio (2)

10.15 10.34 10.20 10.14 9.85

(1)

Other intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.

(2)

Tangible equity, Tier 1 common equity, tangible common equity, and tangible assets are non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, any ratios utilizing these financial measures are also non-GAAP. These financial measures have been included as they are considered to be critical metrics with which to analyze and evaluate financial condition and capital strength. Other companies may calculate these financial measures differently.

Our Tier 1 common equity risk-based ratio improved 23 basis points to 10.71% at June 30, 2013, compared with 10.48% at December 31, 2012. This increase primarily reflected the increase in retained earnings, partially offset by the repurchase of 14.7 million common shares and the impacts related to the payments of dividends.

The following table presents certain regulatory capital data at both the consolidated and Bank levels for each of the past five quarters:

Table 35—Regulatory Capital Data

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,

Total risk-weighted assets

Consolidated $ 48,080 $ 47,937 $ 47,773 $ 48,147 $ 47,890
Bank 48,026 47,842 47,676 48,033 47,786

Tier 1 risk-based capital

Consolidated 5,885 5,829 5,741 5,720 5,714
Bank 5,343 5,162 5,003 4,818 4,636

Tier 2 risk-based capital

Consolidated 1,120 1,144 1,187 1,192 1,190
Bank 819 947 1,091 1,196 1,294

Total risk-based capital

Consolidated 7,005 6,973 6,928 6,912 6,904
Bank 6,162 6,109 6,094 6,014 5,930

Tier 1 leverage ratio

Consolidated 10.64 % 10.57 % 10.36 % 10.29 % 10.34 %
Bank 9.68 9.38 9.05 8.68 8.42

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio

Consolidated 12.24 12.16 12.02 11.88 11.93
Bank 11.13 10.79 10.49 10.03 9.70

Total risk-based capital ratio

Consolidated 14.57 14.55 14.50 14.36 14.42
Bank 12.83 12.77 12.78 12.52 12.41

49


Table of Contents

The increase in our consolidated Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios compared with December 31, 2012, primarily reflected an increase in retained earnings, partially offset by the repurchase of 14.7 million common shares and the impacts related to the payments of dividends.

Shareholders’ Equity

We generate shareholders’ equity primarily through the retention of earnings, net of dividends. Other potential sources of shareholders’ equity include issuances of common and preferred stock. Our objective is to maintain capital at an amount commensurate with our risk profile and risk tolerance objectives, to meet both regulatory and market expectations, and to provide the flexibility needed for future growth and business opportunities. Shareholders’ equity totaled $5.8 billion at June 30, 2013, and was essentially unchanged when compared with December 31, 2012.

Dividends

We consider disciplined capital management as a key objective, with dividends representing one component. Our strong capital ratios and expectations for continued earnings growth positions us to continue to actively explore additional capital management opportunities.

On July 18, 2013, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per common share, payable on October 1, 2013. Also, cash dividends of $0.05 and $0.04 per common share were declared on April 17, 2013 and January 17, 2013, respectively. Our 2013 capital plan to the FRB (see Capital Planning section above) included quarterly common dividends of $0.05 per common share through the 2014 first quarter.

On July 18, 2013, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on our 8.50% Series A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock of $21.25 per share. The dividend is payable on October 15, 2013. Also, cash dividends of $21.25 per share were declared on April 17, 2013 and January 17, 2013.

On July 18, 2013, our board of directors also declared a quarterly cash dividend on our Floating Rate Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock of $7.42 per share. The dividend is payable on October 15, 2013. Also, cash dividends of $7.44 and $7.51 per share were declared on April 17, 2013 and January 17, 2013, respectively.

Share Repurchases

From time to time the board of directors authorizes the Company to repurchase shares of our common stock. Although we announce when the board of directors authorizes share repurchases, we typically do not give any public notice before we repurchase our shares. Future stock repurchases may be private or open-market repurchases, including block transactions, accelerated or delayed block transactions, forward transactions, and similar transactions. Various factors determine the amount and timing of our share repurchases, including our capital requirements, the number of shares we expect to issue for employee benefit plans and acquisitions, market conditions (including the trading price of our stock), and regulatory and legal considerations, including the FRB’s response to our capital plan.

Our board of directors has authorized a share repurchase program consistent with our capital plan of the potential repurchase of up to $227.0 million of common stock. During the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, we repurchased 10.0 million common shares at a weighted average share price of $7.50. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, we repurchased 14.7  million common shares at a weighted average share price of $7.36.

Fair Value

Fair Value Measurements

The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value inherently result in a higher degree of financial statement volatility. We estimate the fair value of a financial instrument using a variety of valuation methods. Where financial instruments are actively traded and have quoted market prices, quoted market prices are used for fair value. We characterize active markets as those where transaction volumes are sufficient to provide objective pricing information, with reasonably narrow bid/ask spreads, and where received quoted prices do not vary widely. When the financial instruments are not actively traded, other observable market inputs, such as quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, may be used, if available, to determine fair value. Inactive markets are characterized by low transaction volumes, price quotations that vary substantially among market participants, or in which minimal information is released publicly. When observable market prices do not exist, we estimate fair value primarily by using cash flow and other financial modeling methods. Our valuation methods consider factors such as liquidity and concentration concerns and, for the derivatives portfolio, counterparty credit risk. Other factors such as model assumptions, market dislocations, and unexpected correlations can affect estimates of fair value. Changes in these underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates in any of these areas could materially impact the amount of revenue or loss recorded.

50


Table of Contents

The FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of financial instruments that considers the attributes specific to particular assets or liabilities and establishes a three-level hierarchy for determining fair value based on the transparency of inputs to each valuation as of the fair value measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 – inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices of identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 – inputs that are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

At the end of each quarter, we assess the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. As necessary, assets or liabilities may be transferred within hierarchy levels due to changes in availability of observable market inputs at the measurement date. The fair values measured at each level of the fair value hierarchy, additional discussion regarding fair value measurements, and a brief description of how fair value is determined for categories that have unobservable inputs, can be found in Note 13 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

51


Table of Contents

BUSINESS SEGMENT DISCUSSION

Overview

We have four major business segments: Retail and Business Banking; Regional and Commercial Banking; Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate; and Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending. A Treasury / Other function also includes our insurance business and other unallocated assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. While this section reviews financial performance from a business segment perspective, it should be read in conjunction with the Discussion of Results of Operations, Note 18 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and other sections for a full understanding of our consolidated financial performance.

Business segment results are determined based upon our management reporting system, which assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each of the business segments. The process is designed around our organizational and management structure and, accordingly, the results derived are not necessarily comparable with similar information published by other financial institutions.

Optimal Customer Relationship (OCR)

Our OCR initiative is a cross-business segment strategy designed to increase overall customer profitability and retention by deepening product and service penetration to consumer and commercial customers. We believe this can be accomplished by taking our broad array of services and products and delivering them through a rigorous and disciplined sales management process that is consistent across all business segments and regions. It is also supported by robust sales and referral technology.

OCR was introduced in late 2009. Through 2010, much of the effort was spent on defining processes, sales training, and systems development to fully capture and measure OCR performance metrics. In 2011, we introduced OCR-related metrics for commercial relationships, which complements the previously disclosed consumer OCR-related metrics. In 2013, we continue to experience strong consumer household and commercial relationship growth.

CONSUMER OCR PERFORMANCE

For consumer OCR performance, there are three key performance metrics: (1) the number of checking account households, (2) the number of services penetration per consumer checking account household, and (3) the revenue generated. Consumer households from all business segments are included.

The growth in consumer checking account number of households is a result of both new sales of checking accounts and improved retention of existing checking account households. The overall objective is to grow the number of households, along with an increase in product penetration.

We use the checking account since it typically represents the primary banking relationship product. We count additional products by type, not number of products. For example, a household that has one checking account and one mortgage, we count as having two services. A household with four checking accounts, we count as having one service. The household relationship utilizing four or more services is viewed to be more profitable and loyal. The overall objective, therefore, is to decrease the percentage of 1-3 services per consumer checking account household, while increasing the percentage of those with 4 or more services. Since we have made significant strides toward having the vast majority of our customer with 4+ products, this quarter we have changed our measurement to 6+ products. We are holding ourselves to a higher performance standard.

The following table presents consumer checking account household OCR metrics:

Table 36—Consumer Checking Household OCR Cross-sell Report

2013 2012
Second First Fourth Third Second

Number of households

1,291,177 1,265,086 1,228,812 1,203,508 1,167,413

Product Penetration by Number of Services (1)

1 Service

3.3 % 2.7 % 3.1 % 4.3 % 3.6 %

2-3 Services

19.9 17.3 18.6 19.8 20.4

4-5 Services

30.1 29.3 31.1 31.3 32.3

6+ Services

46.7 50.7 47.2 44.6 43.7

Total revenue (in millions)

$ 239.1 $ 239.4 $ 251.2 $ 246.0 $ 249.7

(1) The definitions and measurements used in our OCR process are periodically reviewed and updated prospectively.

52


Table of Contents

Our emphasis on cross-sell, coupled with customers increasingly being attracted by our “Fair Play” banking philosophy with benefits such as 24-Hour Grace ® on overdrafts and Asterisk-Free Checking™, are having a positive effect as the number of households increased by 5% from the end of last year. The percent of consumer households with 4-5 products at the end of the 2013 second quarter was 30.1%, down slightly from the end of last year resulting from our periodic review of consumer products and services definitions. The percent of consumer households with 6 or more products at the end of the 2013 second quarter was 46.7%, down from 50.7% at March 31, 2013 and down slightly from the end of last year. This decline was due to the updated products and services definitions. Total consumer checking account household revenue in the 2013 second quarter was $239.1 million, down less than 1%, from the 2013 first quarter, primarily related to typical seasonality and the February 2013 implementation of a new posting order for consumer transaction accounts. Total consumer checking account household revenue was down $10.6 million, or 4%, from the year-ago quarter, primarily due to the new posting order for consumer transaction accounts.

COMMERCIAL OCR PERFORMANCE

For commercial OCR performance, there are three key performance metrics: (1) the number of commercial relationships, (2) the number of services penetration per commercial relationship, and (3) the revenue generated. Commercial relationships include relationships from all business segments.

The growth in the number of commercial relationships is a result of both new sales of checking accounts and improved retention of existing commercial accounts. The overall objective is to grow the number of relationships, along with an increase in product service distribution.

The commercial relationship is defined as a business banking or commercial banking customer with a checking account relationship. We use this metric because we believe that the checking account anchors a business relationship and creates the opportunity to increase our cross-sell. Multiple sales of the same type of product are counted as one product, the same as consumer.

The following table presents commercial relationship OCR metrics:

Table 37—Commercial Relationship OCR Cross-sell Report

2013 2012
Second First Fourth Third Second

Commercial Relationships (1)

158,010 155,584 151,083 149,333 147,190

Product Penetration by Number of Services (2)

1 Service

22.8 % 23.7 % 24.6 % 25.9 % 26.5 %

2-3 Services

40.9 40.2 40.4 40.6 40.9

4+ Services

36.3 36.1 35.0 33.5 32.6

Total revenue (in millions)

$ 178.6 $ 175.1 $ 189.8 $ 175.7 $ 189.2

(1) Checking account required.
(2) The definitions and measurements used in our OCR process are periodically reviewed and updated prospectively.

53


Table of Contents

By focusing on targeted relationships we are able to achieve higher product service distribution among our commercial relationships, but leverage these relationships to generate a deeper share of wallet. The percent of commercial relationships utilizing 4 or more products at the end of 2013 second quarter was 36.3%, up from 35.0% from the end of last year. For the first six-month period of 2013, commercial relationships grew 5%. Total commercial relationship revenue in the 2013 second quarter was $178.6 million, up $3.5 million, 2%, from the 2013 first quarter, and down $10.6 million, 6% from the year-ago quarter. This was due to lower commercial customer transaction volumes.

Revenue Sharing

Revenue is recorded in the business segment responsible for the related product or service. Fee sharing is recorded to allocate portions of such revenue to other business segments involved in selling to, or providing service to, customers. Results of operations for the business segments reflect these fee sharing allocations.

Expense Allocation

The management accounting process that develops the business segment reporting utilizes various estimates and allocation methodologies to measure the performance of the business segments. Expenses are allocated to business segments using a two-phase approach. The first phase consists of measuring and assigning unit costs (activity-based costs) to activities related to product origination and servicing. These activity-based costs are then extended, based on volumes, with the resulting amount allocated to business segments that own the related products. The second phase consists of the allocation of overhead costs to all four business segments from Treasury / Other. We utilize a full-allocation methodology, where all Treasury / Other expenses, except those related to our insurance business, reported Significant Items (except for the goodwill impairment), and a small amount of other residual unallocated expenses, are allocated to the four business segments.

Funds Transfer Pricing (FTP)

We use an active and centralized FTP methodology to attribute appropriate net interest income to the business segments. The intent of the FTP methodology is to eliminate all interest rate risk from the business segments by providing matched duration funding of assets and liabilities. The result is to centralize the financial impact, management, and reporting of interest rate and liquidity risk in the Treasury / Other function where it can be centrally monitored and managed. The Treasury / Other function charges (credits) an internal cost of funds for assets held in (or pays for funding provided by) each business segment. The FTP rate is based on prevailing market interest rates for comparable duration assets (or liabilities), and includes an estimate for the cost of liquidity (liquidity premium). Deposits of an indeterminate maturity receive an FTP credit based on a combination of vintage-based average lives and replicating portfolio pool rates. Other assets, liabilities, and capital are charged (credited) with a four-year moving average FTP rate. The denominator in the net interest margin calculation has been modified to add the amount of net funds provided by each business segment for all periods presented.

Treasury / Other

The Treasury / Other function includes revenue and expense related to our insurance business, and assets, liabilities, and equity not directly assigned or allocated to one of the four business segments. Other assets include investment securities and bank owned life insurance. The financial impact associated with our FTP methodology, as described above, is also included.

Net interest income includes the impact of administering our investment securities portfolios and the net impact of derivatives used to hedge interest rate sensitivity. Noninterest income includes insurance income, miscellaneous fee income not allocated to other business segments, such as bank owned life insurance income and any investment security and trading asset gains or losses. Noninterest expense includes any insurance-related expenses, as well as certain corporate administrative, merger, and other miscellaneous expenses not allocated to other business segments. The provision for income taxes for the business segments is calculated at a statutory 35% tax rate, though our overall effective tax rate is lower. As a result, Treasury / Other reflects a credit for income taxes representing the difference between the lower actual effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate used to allocate income taxes to the business segments.

The $37.6 million, or 93.7%, year over year increase in net income for Treasury/Other was primarily the result of the FTP process described above; partially offset by an increase in personnel costs.

54


Table of Contents

Net Income by Business Segment

We reported net income of $302.4 million during the first six-month period of 2013. This compared with net income of $306.0 million during the first six-month period of 2012. The segregation of net income by business segment for the first six-month period of 2013 and 2012 is presented in the following table:

Table 38—Net Income by Business Segment

Six Months Ended June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Retail and Business Banking

$ 38,562 $ 58,376

Regional and Commercial Banking

66,331 41,832

AFCRE

84,865 124,753

WGH

35,051 40,947

Treasury/Other

77,622 40,068

Total net income

$ 302,431 $ 305,976

Average Loans/Leases and Deposits by Business Segment

The segregation of total average loans and leases and total average deposits by business segment for the first six-month period of 2013 and 2012 is presented in the following table:

Table 39—Average Loans/Leases and Deposits by Business Segment

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

(dollar amounts in millions)

Retail and
Business Banking
Regional and
Commercial
Banking
AFCRE WGH Treasury /
Other
TOTAL

Average Loans/Leases

Commercial and industrial

$ 3,414 $ 10,638 $ 2,291 $ 596 $ 55 $ 16,994

Commercial real estate

419 366 4,159 209 5,153

Total commercial

3,833 11,004 6,450 805 55 22,147

Automobile

5,061 (3 ) 5,058

Home equity

7,498 7 1 854 (83 ) 8,277

Residential mortgage

1,073 7 4,091 (69 ) 5,102

Other consumer

286 4 58 24 116 488

Total consumer

8,857 18 5,120 4,969 (39 ) 18,925

Total loans and leases

$ 12,690 $ 11,022 $ 11,570 $ 5,774 $ 16 $ 41,072

Average Deposits

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 5,230 $ 3,219 $ 554 $ 3,230 $ 291 $ 12,524

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

4,761 92 50 1,042 7 5,952

Money market deposits

8,332 2,022 252 4,442 9 15,057

Savings and other domestic deposits

4,923 15 12 150 (1 ) 5,099

Core certificates of deposit

4,956 22 2 75 5 5,060

Total core deposits

28,202 5,370 870 8,939 311 43,692

Other deposits

135 216 68 832 1,157 2,408

Total deposits

$ 28,337 $ 5,586 $ 938 $ 9,771 $ 1,468 $ 46,100

55


Table of Contents
Six months ended June 30, 2012

(dollar amounts in millions)

Retail and
Business Banking
Regional and
Commercial
Banking
AFCRE WGH Treasury /
Other
TOTAL

Average Loans/Leases

Commercial and industrial

$ 3,272 $ 9,315 $ 2,005 $ 781 $ 85 $ 15,458

Commercial real estate

613 388 4,800 168 (5 ) 5,964

Total commercial

3,885 9,703 6,805 949 80 21,422

Automobile

4,780 1 4,781

Home equity

7,420 25 1 814 12 8,272

Residential mortgage

1,039 8 4,162 5 5,214

Other consumer

362 5 94 40 (28 ) 473

Total consumer

8,821 38 4,875 5,016 (10 ) 18,740

Total loans and leases

$ 12,706 $ 9,741 $ 11,680 $ 5,965 $ 70 $ 40,162

Average Deposits

Demand deposits—noninterest-bearing

$ 4,538 $ 2,735 $ 474 $ 3,698 $ 223 $ 11,668

Demand deposits—interest-bearing

4,616 99 49 1,023 5 5,792

Money market deposits

7,405 1,613 236 3,907 1 13,162

Savings and other domestic deposits

4,716 14 16 154 (2 ) 4,898

Core certificates of deposit

6,419 25 2 111 7 6,564

Total core deposits

27,694 4,486 777 8,893 234 42,084

Other deposits

172 237 57 726 885 2,077

Total deposits

$ 27,866 $ 4,723 $ 834 $ 9,619 $ 1,119 $ 44,161

56


Table of Contents

Retail and Business Banking

Table 40—Key Performance Indicators for Retail and Business Banking

Six Months Ended June 30, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Net interest income

$ 409,809 $ 442,946 $ (33,137 ) (7 )%

Provision for credit losses

58,017 64,886 (6,869 ) (11 )

Noninterest income

184,578 186,995 (2,417 ) (1 )

Noninterest expense

477,044 475,246 1,798

Provision for income taxes

20,764 31,433 (10,669 ) (34 )

Net income

$ 38,562 $ 58,376 $ (19,814 ) (34 )%

Number of employees (full-time equivalent)

5,311 5,572 (261 ) (5 )%

Total average assets (in millions)

$ 14,411 $ 14,259 $ 152 1

Total average loans/leases (in millions)

12,690 12,706 (16 )

Total average deposits (in millions)

28,337 27,866 471 2

Net interest margin

2.94 % 3.20 % (0.26 )% (8 )

NCOs

$ 61,583 $ 76,139 $ (14,556 ) (19 )

NCOs as a % of average loans and leases

0.97 % 1.20 % (0.23 )% (19 )

Return on average common equity

5.5 8.3 (2.8 ) (34 )

2013 First Six Months vs. 2012 First Six Months

Retail and Business Banking reported net income of $38.6 million in the first six-month period of 2013. This was a decrease of $19.8 million, or 34%, when compared to the year-ago period. The decrease in net income reflected a combination of factors described below.

The decrease in net interest income from the year-ago period reflected:

26 basis points decrease in the net interest margin. This decrease was mainly due to a 29 basis point decrease in deposit spreads that resulted from a reduction in the funds transfer prices rates assigned to those deposits.

Partially offset by:

$0.5 billion, or 2%, increase in total average deposits.

7 basis points increase in loan spreads, driven by a reduction in funds transfer price assigned to loans.

The decrease in total average loans and leases from the year-ago period reflected:

$52 million, or 1.3%, decrease in the commercial portfolio, which was primarily driven by increased payoff activity from the acquired Fidelity portfolio.

Partially offset by:

$36 million, or 0.4%, increase in consumer loans which reflected growth in residential mortgages and consumer first-lien refinance loans.

The increase in total average deposits from the year-ago period reflected:

$0.9 billion, or 13%, increase in money market deposits.

$0.8 billion, or 9%, increase in demand deposits.

57


Table of Contents

Partially offset by:

$1.5 billion, or 23%, decrease in core certificate of deposits, which reflected continued focus on product mix in reducing the overall cost of deposits.

The decrease in the provision for credit losses from the year-ago period reflected:

A continued improvement in the credit quality of the portfolio, as evidenced by a 23 basis point reduction in NCOs and a $5 million decline in NALs.

The decrease in noninterest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$7.7 million decline related to miscellaneous other fee income items, primarily due to the change in posting order.

$2.1 million, or 26%, decrease in gain on sale of loans.

$1.6 million, or 33%, decrease in SBA servicing fees.

Partially offset by:

$4.9 million, or 13%, increase in electronic banking income, due to strong consumer household growth combined with a 16% increase in consumer debit card spending.

$4.7 million, or 5%, increase in deposit service charge income due to strong household and account growth.

The increase in noninterest expense from the year-ago period reflected:

$12.6 million increase in expenses related to expansion of our Giant Eagle and Meijer in-stores branch network.

Partially offset by:

$10.5 million, or 6%, decrease in expenses related to our traditional branches.

58


Table of Contents

Regional and Commercial Banking

Table 41—Key Performance Indicators for Regional and Commercial Banking

Six Months Ended June 30, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Net interest income

$ 137,344 $ 132,121 $ 5,223 4 %

Provision (reduction in allowance) for credit losses

(7,627 ) 37,609 (45,236 ) (120 )

Noninterest income

64,231 67,403 (3,172 ) (5 )

Noninterest expense

107,154 97,558 9,596 10

Provision for income taxes

35,717 22,525 13,192 59

Net income

$ 66,331 $ 41,832 $ 24,499 59 %

Number of employees (full-time equivalent)

746 687 59 9 %

Total average assets (in millions)

$ 11,837 $ 10,630 $ 1,207 11

Total average loans/leases (in millions)

11,022 9,741 1,281 13

Total average deposits (in millions)

5,586 4,723 863 18

Net interest margin

2.62 % 2.81 % (0.19 )% (7 )

NCOs

$ (3,144 ) $ 19,086 $ (22,230 ) (116 )

NCOs as a % of average loans and leases

(0.06 )% 0.39 % (0.45 )% (115 )

Return on average common equity

13.3 9.9 3.4 34

2013 First Six Months vs. 2012 First Six Months

Regional and Commercial Banking reported net income of $66.3 million in the first six-month period of 2013. This was an increase of $24.5 million, or 59%, compared to the year-ago period. The increase in net income reflected a combination of factors described below.

The increase in net interest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$1.3 billion, or 13%, increase in total average loans and leases.

$0.9 billion, or 18%, increase in average total deposits.

Partially offset by:

19 basis point decrease in the net interest margin due to compressed deposit margins resulting from declining rates and reduced FTP rates, partially offset by a small increase on the commercial loan spread.

The increase in total average loans and leases from the year-ago period reflected:

$0.5 billion, or 27%, increase in the equipment finance portfolio average balance, which reflected our focus on developing vertical strategies in business aircraft, rail industry, lender finance, and syndications.

$0.4 billion, or 37%, increase in the healthcare portfolio average balance due to strategic focus on the banking needs of the healthcare industry, specifically targeting alternate site real estate, seniors’ real estate, medical technology, community hospitals, metro hospitals, and health care services.

$0.3 billion, or 6%, increase in the general middle market portfolio average balance primarily in our major metro markets overcoming a $0.3 billion or 8% reduction in the funded balances of lines of credit due to a reduction in the average utilization rate.

$0.2 billion, or 10%, increase in the large corporate portfolio average balance due to establishing relationships with targeted prospects within our footprint.

59


Table of Contents

Partially offset by:

$0.2 billion, or 42%, decrease in commercial loans managed by SAD, which reflected improved credit quality in the portfolio.

The increase in total average deposits from the year-ago period reflected:

$0.9 billion, or 20%, increase in core deposits, which primarily reflected a $0.5 billion increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits. Regional and Commercial Banking initiated a strategic focus to gain a deeper share of wallet with certain key relationships. This focus was specifically targeted to liquidity solutions for these customers and resulted in significant deposit growth. Middle market accounts, such as not-for-profit universities and healthcare, contributed $0.7 billion of the balance growth, while large corporate accounts contributed $0.2 billion.

The decrease in the provision for credit losses from the year-ago period reflected:

A continued improvement in the credit quality of the portfolio, as evidenced by a 45 basis point reduction in NCOs and a $42 million decline in NALs.

The decrease in noninterest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$2.2 million, or 10%, decrease in capital markets related income attributed to a $3.4 million, or 30%, decrease in sales of customer interest rate protection products, partially offset by a $0.8 million or 17% increase in foreign exchange revenue and a $0.2 million or 3% increase in institutional brokerage income.

$2.4 million, or 12%, decrease in deposit service charge income and other Treasury Management related revenue reflecting the impact of earnings credits by our customers.

$1.4 million, or 48%, decrease in syndications revenue attributed to a lengthening of the sales cycle.

Partially offset by:

$2.8 million increase related to miscellaneous other fee income items.

The increase in noninterest expense from the year-ago period reflected:

$8.0 million, or 16%, increase in personnel costs, primarily reflecting a 9% increase in FTE. This increase in personnel is attributable to our strategic investments in our core footprint markets, vertical strategies, and product capabilities.

$2.9 million, or 26%, increase in allocated overhead.

$1.6 million, or 40%, increase in outside data processing and other services, primarily attributed to Treasury Management products and services, such as the new Commercial Card product implemented in 2013.

Partially offset by:

$1.9 million, or 31%, decrease in credit quality related expenses reflecting the continued improvement in the commercial loan portfolio as evidenced by a 42% reduction in the average balance of the SAD portfolio compared to the year ago period.

$1.0 million decrease related to miscellaneous other expense items, stemming from improved credit quality in the commercial loan portfolio.

60


Table of Contents

Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate

Table 42—Key Performance Indicators for Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate

Six Months Ended June 30, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Net interest income

$ 175,731 $ 177,192 $ (1,461 ) (1 )%

Provision (reduction in allowance) for credit losses

(12,802 ) (47,082 ) (34,280 ) (73 )

Noninterest income

16,246 45,018 (28,772 ) (64 )

Noninterest expense

74,217 77,365 (3,148 ) (4 )

Provision for income taxes

45,697 67,174 (21,477 ) (32 )

Net income

$ 84,865 $ 124,753 $ (39,888 ) (32 )%

Number of employees (full-time equivalent)

271 271 %

Total average assets (in millions)

$ 12,269 $ 12,482 $ (213 ) (2 )

Total average loans/leases (in millions)

11,570 11,680 (110 ) (1 )

Total average deposits (in millions)

939 834 105 13

Net interest margin

2.87 % 2.82 % 0.05 % 2

NCOs

$ 16,261 $ 52,637 $ (36,376 ) (69 )

NCOs as a % of average loans and leases

0.28 % 0.90 % (0.62 )% (69 )

Return on average common equity

31.6 41.6 (10.0 ) (24 )

2013 First Six Months vs. 2012 First Six Months

AFCRE reported net income of $84.9 million in the first six-month period of 2013. This was a decrease of $39.9 million, or 32%, compared to the year-ago period. The decrease in net income reflected a combination of factors described below.

The decrease in net interest income from the year ago period reflected:

$0.1 billion, or 1%, decrease in average loans reflecting a $0.6 billion, or 13%, decrease in commercial real estate loans offset by a $0.3 billion, or 6%, increase in indirect automobile loans and a $0.3 billion, or 21%, increase in automobile floor plan loans.

$0.2 billion, or 40%, decrease in average loans held for sale related to automobile loan securitization activities.

Partially offset by:

5 basis point increase in the net interest margin. This increase primarily reflected purchase accounting adjustments related to certain acquired commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios, as well as the continuation of our risk-based pricing strategies in the CRE portfolio and maintaining our pricing discipline on indirect auto loan originations.

The reduction in allowance for credit losses from the year-ago period reflected:

A reduction in the levels of reserve releases associated with declines in non-performing loans. During the first six month period of 2013, NALs declined by $127 million.

The decrease in noninterest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$23.0 million, or 100%, decrease in gain on sale of loans resulting from the $23.0 million gain on securitization and sale of $1.3 billion of indirect auto loans in the 2012 first quarter.

$5.0 million, or 75%, decrease in operating lease income resulting from the continued runoff of that portfolio, as we exited that business at the end of 2008.

The decrease in noninterest expense from the year-ago period reflected:

$3.8 million, or 76%, decrease in operating lease expense resulting from the continued runoff of that portfolio.

61


Table of Contents

Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending

Table 43—Key Performance Indicators for Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending

Six Months Ended June 30, Change

(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)

2013 2012 Amount Percent

Net interest income

$ 86,299 $ 95,215 $ (8,916 ) (9 )%

Provision for credit losses

16,726 15,512 1,214 8

Noninterest income

170,705 168,231 2,474 1

Noninterest expense

186,353 184,939 1,414 1

Provision for income taxes

18,874 22,048 (3,174 ) (14 )

Net income

$ 35,051 $ 40,947 $ (5,896 ) (14 )%

Number of employees (full-time equivalent)

2,164 2,042 122 6 %

Total average assets (in millions)

$ 7,434 $ 7,547 $ (113 ) (1 )

Total average loans/leases (in millions)

5,774 5,965 (191 ) (3 )

Total average deposits (in millions)

9,771 9,619 152 2

Net interest margin

1.75 % 1.88 % (0.13 )% (7 )

NCOs

$ 14,618 $ 23,335 $ (8,717 ) (37 )

NCOs as a % of average loans and leases

0.51 % 0.78 % (0.27 )% (35 )

Return on average common equity

9.8 11.0 (1.2 ) (11 )

Mortgage banking origination volume (in millions)

$ 2,401 $ 2,448 $ (47 ) (2 )

Noninterest income shared with other business segments (1)

20,669 24,400 (3,731 ) (15 )

Total assets under management (in billions)—eop

16.8 15.0 1.8 12

Total trust assets (in billions)—eop

78.4 63.5 14.9 23

(1) Amount is not included in noninterest income reported above.

eop—End of Period.

2013 First Six Months vs. 2012 First Six Months

WGH reported net income of $35.1 million in the first six-month period of 2013. This was an decrease of $5.9 million, or 14%, when compared to the year-ago period. The decrease in net income reflected a combination of factors described below.

The decrease in net interest income from the year-ago period reflected:

13 basis point decrease in the net interest margin, primarily due to compressed deposit margins resulting from declining rates and reduced FTP rates.

$0.2 billion, or 3%, decrease in average total loans and leases.

Partially offset by:

$0.2 billion, or 2%, increase in average total deposits.

The increase in provision for credit losses reflected:

$7.7 million, or 108% increase in total delinquencies.

$4.9 million, or 122% increase in classified assets, which includes a small number of large balance loans.

Partially offset by:

$8.7 million, or 37% decline in NCOs.

The increase in noninterest income from the year-ago period reflected:

$4.7 million, or 71%, increase in other income, primarily due to a gain on sale of certain Low Income Housing Tax Credit investments.

$1.6 million, or 7%, increase in brokerage income.

62


Table of Contents

Partially offset by:

$5.1 million, or 7%, decrease in mortgage banking income due to a higher percentage of mortgages retained on the balance sheet and the narrower spread on production.

The increase in noninterest expense from the year-ago period reflected:

$3.3 million, or 3%, increase in personnel costs, which reflected higher sales commissions.

$0.8 million, or 2%, increase in other expenses, primarily due to loan system conversion costs and an increase in allocated overhead expense.

Partially offset by:

$1.3 million, or 8%, decrease in outside data processing and other services expense.

63


Table of Contents

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

Forward-Looking Statements

This report, including MD&A, contains certain forward-looking statements, including certain plans, expectations, goals, projections, and statements, which are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Statements that do not describe historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as expect, anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, plan, target, goal, or similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as will, may, might, should, would, could, or similar variations. The forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained or implied in the forward-looking statements: (1) worsening of credit quality performance due to a number of factors such as the underlying value of collateral that could prove less valuable than otherwise assumed and assumed cash flows may be worse than expected; (2) changes in economic conditions, including impacts from the implementation of the Budget Control Act of 2011, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2013, as well as the continuing economic uncertainty in the US, the European Union, and other areas; (3) movements in interest rates; (4) competitive pressures on product pricing and services; (5) success, impact, and timing of our business strategies, including market acceptance of any new products or services implementing our “Fair Play” banking philosophy; (6) changes in accounting policies and principles and the accuracy of our assumptions and estimates used to prepare our financial statements; (7) extended disruption of vital infrastructure; (8) the final outcome of significant litigation; (9) the nature, extent, timing, and results of governmental actions, examinations, reviews, reforms, regulations, and interpretations, including those related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Basel III regulatory capital reforms, as well as those involving the OCC, Federal Reserve, and CFPB; and (10) the outcome of judicial and regulatory decisions regarding practices in the residential mortgage industry, including among other things the processes followed for foreclosing residential mortgages. Additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those described above can be found in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and documents subsequently filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and are based on information available at that time. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements were made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events except as required by federal securities laws. As forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, caution should be exercised against placing undue reliance on such statements.

Non-Regulatory Capital Ratios

In addition to capital ratios defined by banking regulators, the Company considers various other measures when evaluating capital utilization and adequacy, including:

Tangible common equity to tangible assets,

Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets using Basel I and proposed Basel III definitions, and

Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets using Basel I definition.

These non-regulatory capital ratios are viewed by management as useful additional methods of reflecting the level of capital available to withstand unexpected market conditions. Additionally, presentation of these ratios allows readers to compare the Company’s capitalization to other financial services companies. These ratios differ from capital ratios defined by banking regulators principally in that the numerator excludes preferred securities, the nature and extent of which varies among different financial services companies. These ratios are not defined in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) or federal banking regulations. As a result, these non-regulatory capital ratios disclosed by the Company may be considered non-GAAP financial measures.

Because there are no standardized definitions for these non-regulatory capital ratios, the Company’s calculation methods may differ from those used by other financial services companies. Also, there may be limits in the usefulness of these measures to investors. As a result, the Company encourages readers to consider the consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in this Form 10-Q in their entirety, and not to rely on any single financial measure. Basel III Tier 1 common capital ratio estimates are based on management’s current interpretation, expectations, and understanding of the final U.S. Basel III rules adopted by the Federal Reserve Board and released on July 2, 2013.

64


Table of Contents

Risk Factors

Information on risk is discussed in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A of our 2012 Form 10-K. Additional information regarding risk factors can also be found in the Risk Management and Capital discussion of this report.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Significant Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to establish critical accounting policies and make accounting estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect amounts recorded and reported in our financial statements. Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2012 Form 10-K, as supplemented by this report, lists significant accounting policies we use in the development and presentation of our financial statements. This MD&A, the significant accounting policies, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables and other qualitative and quantitative factors necessary for an understanding and evaluation of our company, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

An accounting estimate requires assumptions about uncertain matters that could have a material effect on the financial statements if a different amount within a range of estimates were used or if estimates changed from period to period. Estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time, and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce results that significantly differ from when those estimates were made.

Our most significant accounting estimates relate to our ACL, income taxes and deferred tax assets, and fair value measurements of investment securities, goodwill, pension, and other real estate owned. These significant accounting estimates and their related application are discussed in our 2012 Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments

Note 2 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting pronouncements adopted during 2013 and the expected impact of accounting pronouncements recently issued but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affect financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable section of this MD&A and the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

65


Table of Contents

Item 1: Financial Statements

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands, except number of shares)

June 30, December 31,

Assets

Cash and due from banks

$ 993,906 $ 1,262,806

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

76,715 70,921

Trading account securities

80,927 91,205

Loans held for sale (includes $418,386 and $452,949 respectively, measured at fair value) (1)

458,275 764,309

Available-for-sale and other securities

6,815,658 7,566,175

Held-to-maturity securities

2,172,229 1,743,876

Loans and leases (includes $91,140 and $142,762 respectively, measured at fair value) (2)

41,739,847 40,728,425

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(733,076 ) (769,075 )

Net loans and leases

41,006,771 39,959,350

Bank owned life insurance

1,620,604 1,596,056

Premises and equipment

626,745 617,257

Goodwill

444,268 444,268

Other intangible assets

113,874 132,157

Accrued income and other assets

1,703,715 1,904,805

Total assets

$ 56,113,687 $ 56,153,185

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Liabilities

Deposits

$ 46,331,434 $ 46,252,683

Short-term borrowings

630,405 589,814

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

983,420 1,008,959

Other long-term debt

155,126 158,784

Subordinated notes

1,114,368 1,197,091

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

1,115,419 1,155,643

Total liabilities

50,330,172 50,362,974

Shareholders’ equity

Preferred stock—authorized 6,617,808 shares:

Series A, 8.50% fixed rate, non-cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock, par value of $0.01, and liquidation value per share of $1,000

362,507 362,507

Series B, floating rate, non-voting, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, par value of $0.01, and liquidation value per share of $1,000

23,785 23,785

Common stock

8,310 8,441

Capital surplus

7,390,041 7,475,149

Less treasury shares, at cost

(10,719 ) (10,921 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(283,736 ) (150,817 )

Retained (deficit) earnings

(1,706,673 ) (1,917,933 )

Total shareholders’ equity

5,783,515 5,790,211

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 56,113,687 $ 56,153,185

Common shares authorized (par value of $0.01)

1,500,000,000 1,500,000,000

Common shares issued

831,030,258 844,105,349

Common shares outstanding

829,674,914 842,812,709

Treasury shares outstanding

1,355,344 1,292,640

Preferred shares issued

1,967,071 1,967,071

Preferred shares outstanding

398,007 398,007

(1) Amounts represent loans for which Huntington has elected the fair value option.
(2) Amounts represent certain assets of a consolidated VIE for which Huntington has elected the fair value option.

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

66


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Interest and fee income:

Loans and leases

$ 405,445 $ 428,859 $ 812,324 $ 840,907

Available-for-sale and other securities

Taxable

38,539 48,244 78,724 97,068

Tax-exempt

2,760 2,124 5,375 4,323

Held-to-maturity securities—taxable

9,778 4,538 19,616 9,252

Other

6,060 3,779 11,862 15,931

Total interest income

462,582 487,544 927,901 967,481

Interest expense:

Deposits

29,591 41,790 61,626 85,570

Short-term borrowings

179 558 413 1,141

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

273 333 574 555

Subordinated notes and other long-term debt

7,602 15,901 16,181 34,044

Total interest expense

37,645 58,582 78,794 121,310

Net interest income

424,937 428,962 849,107 846,171

Provision for credit losses

24,722 36,520 54,314 70,926

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

400,215 392,442 794,793 775,245

Service charges on deposit accounts

68,009 65,998 128,892 126,290

Mortgage banking

33,659 38,349 78,907 84,767

Trust services

30,666 29,914 61,826 60,820

Electronic banking

23,345 20,514 44,058 39,144

Brokerage

19,546 19,025 37,541 38,285

Insurance

17,187 17,384 36,439 36,259

Gain on sale of loans

3,348 4,131 5,964 30,901

Bank owned life insurance income

15,421 13,967 28,863 27,904

Capital markets fees

12,229 13,260 20,063 23,056

Net gains on sales of securities

610 603 797 1,227

Impairment losses recognized in earnings on available-for-sale securities

(1,020 ) (253 ) (1,716 ) (1,490 )

Other noninterest income

25,655 30,927 59,230 71,976

Total noninterest income

248,655 253,819 500,864 539,139

Personnel costs

263,862 243,034 522,757 486,532

Outside data processing and other services

49,898 48,568 99,163 91,160

Net occupancy

27,656 25,474 57,770 54,553

Equipment

24,947 24,872 49,827 50,417

Deposit and other insurance expense

13,460 15,731 28,950 36,469

Professional services

9,341 15,037 16,533 25,734

Marketing

14,239 17,396 25,210 30,965

Amortization of intangibles

10,362 11,940 20,682 23,471

OREO and foreclosure expense

(271 ) 4,106 2,395 9,056

Loss (Gain) on extinguishment of debt

(2,580 ) (2,580 )

Other noninterest expense

32,371 40,691 65,371 101,168

Total noninterest expense

445,865 444,269 888,658 906,945

Income before income taxes

203,005 201,992 406,999 407,439

Provision for income taxes

52,354 49,286 104,568 101,463

Net income

150,651 152,706 302,431 305,976

Dividends on preferred shares

7,967 7,984 15,937 16,033

Net income applicable to common shares

$ 142,684 $ 144,722 $ 286,494 $ 289,943

Average common shares—basic

834,730 862,261 837,917 863,380

Average common shares—diluted

843,840 867,551 846,274 868,357

Per common share:

Net income—basic

$ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.34 $ 0.34

Net income—diluted

0.17 0.17 0.34 0.33

Cash dividends declared

0.05 0.04 0.09 0.08

OTTI losses for the periods presented:

Total OTTI losses

$ (1,020 ) $ (2,245 ) $ (1,716 ) $ (1,721 )

Noncredit-related portion of loss recognized in OCI

1,992 231

Impairment losses recognized in earnings on available-for-sale securities

$ (1,020 ) $ (253 ) $ (1,716 ) $ (1,490 )

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

67


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Net income

$ 150,651 $ 152,706 $ 302,431 $ 305,976

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale and other securities:

Non-credit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold

3,945 (463 ) 7,754 4,064

Unrealized net gains (losses) on available-for-sale and other securities arising during the period, net of reclassification for net realized gains

(76,664 ) 2,716 (81,989 ) 20,562

Total unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale and other securities

(72,719 ) 2,253 (74,235 ) 24,626

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivatives

(56,410 ) 16,343 (69,380 ) 6,674

Change in accumulated unrealized losses for pension and other post-retirement obligations

5,348 3,243 10,696 6,486

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(123,781 ) 21,839 (132,919 ) 37,786

Comprehensive income

$ 26,870 $ 174,545 $ 169,512 $ 343,762

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

68


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

Preferred Stock Accumulated
Series B Other Retained
(All amounts in thousands, Series A Floating Rate Common Stock Capital Treasury Stock Comprehensive Earnings
except for per share amounts) Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Surplus Shares Amount Loss (Deficit) Total

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

Balance, beginning of period

363 $ 362,507 35 $ 23,785 865,585 $ 8,656 $ 7,596,809 (1,178 ) $ (10,255 ) $ (173,763 ) $ (2,389,639 ) $ 5,418,100

Net income

305,976 305,976

Other comprehensive income (loss)

37,786 37,786

Repurchase of common stock

(6,426 ) (64 ) (40,166 ) (40,230 )

Cash dividends declared:

Common ($0.08 per share)

(68,923 ) (68,923 )

Preferred Series A ($42.50 per share)

(15,407 ) (15,407 )

Preferred Series B ($17.64 per share)

(626 ) (626 )

Recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation

12,820 12,820

Other share-based compensation activity

438 4 13 (41 ) (24 )

Other

5 (18 ) (138 ) (108 ) (241 )

Balance, end of period

363 $ 362,507 35 $ 23,785 859,597 $ 8,596 $ 7,569,481 (1,196 ) $ (10,393 ) $ (135,977 ) $ (2,168,768 ) $ 5,649,231

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

Balance, beginning of period

363 $ 362,507 35 $ 23,785 844,105 $ 8,441 $ 7,475,149 (1,292 ) $ (10,921 ) $ (150,817 ) $ (1,917,933 ) $ 5,790,211

Net income

302,431 302,431

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(132,919 ) (132,919 )

Repurchases of common stock

(14,734 ) (147 ) (108,651 ) (108,798 )

Cash dividends declared:

Common ($0.09 per share)

(75,094 ) (75,094 )

Preferred Series A ($42.50 per share)

(15,406 ) (15,406 )

Preferred Series B ($14.95 per share)

(531 ) (531 )

Recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation

17,896 17,896

Other share-based compensation activity

1,659 16 6,280 (137 ) 6,159

Other

(633 ) (63 ) 202 (3 ) (434 )

Balance, end of period

363 $ 362,507 35 $ 23,785 831,030 $ 8,310 $ 7,390,041 (1,355 ) $ (10,719 ) $ (283,736 ) $ (1,706,673 ) $ 5,783,515

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

69


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

Six Months Ended
June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Operating activities

Net income

$ 302,431 $ 305,976

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Provision for credit losses

54,314 70,926

Depreciation and amortization

135,364 138,876

Share-based compensation expense

17,896 12,820

Change in deferred income taxes

72,943 121,029

Originations of loans held for sale

(1,583,569 ) (1,915,289 )

Principal payments on and proceeds from loans held for sale

1,624,214 1,836,963

Gain on sale of loans held for sale

(34,687 ) (19,012 )

Gain on early extinguishment of debt

(2,580 )

Bargain purchase gain

(11,409 )

Net gain on sales of securities

(797 ) (1,227 )

Impairment losses recognized in earnings on available-for-sale securities

1,716 1,490

Net change in:

Trading account securities

10,278 (7,938 )

Accrued income and other assets

(9,016 ) 160,496

Accrued expense and other liabilities

(181,999 ) (130,346 )

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

409,088 560,775

Investing activities

Increase (decrease) in interest bearing deposits in banks

86,480 67,714

Net cash received from acquisition

40,310

Proceeds from:

Maturities and calls of available-for-sale and other securities

772,700 949,026

Maturities of held-to-maturity securities

111,280 40,852

Sales of available-for-sale and other securities

328,031 307,160

Purchases of available-for-sale and other securities

(777,389 ) (1,779,203 )

Purchases of held-to-maturity securities

(248,741 )

Net proceeds from sales of loans

236,373 1,527,739

Net loan and lease activity, excluding sales

(1,077,734 ) (2,248,763 )

Proceeds from sale of operating lease assets

7,499 16,784

Purchases of premises and equipment

(49,127 ) (55,477 )

Proceeds from sales of other real estate

20,800 20,684

Purchases of loans and leases

(18,110 ) (393,191 )

Other, net

2,015 2,205

Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities

(605,923 ) (1,504,160 )

Financing activities

Increase (decrease) in deposits

82,055 2,084,321

Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings

109,480 (331,381 )

Maturity/redemption of subordinated notes

(50,000 ) (88,600 )

Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances

2,275,000 815,000

Maturity/redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank advances

(2,300,566 ) (387,548 )

Maturity/redemption of long-term debt

(2,086 ) (919,814 )

Dividends paid on preferred stock

(15,943 ) (15,752 )

Dividends paid on common stock

(67,569 ) (69,117 )

Repurchases of common stock

(108,798 ) (40,230 )

Other, net

6,362 (874 )

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

(72,065 ) 1,046,005

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(268,900 ) 102,620

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,262,806 1,115,968

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 993,906 $ 1,218,588

Supplemental disclosures:

Income taxes paid (refunded)

$ 49,699 $ 4,703

Interest paid

75,957 128,425

Non-cash activities

Loans transferred to loans held for sale

50,788 1,656,486

Loan transfer to portfolio from held-for-sale

307,303

Dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter

47,832 47,859

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

70


Table of Contents

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Huntington reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals which are, in the opinion of Management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, the results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the SEC and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Huntington’s 2012 Form 10-K, which include descriptions of significant accounting policies, as updated by the information contained in this report, should be read in conjunction with these interim financial statements.

For statement of cash flows purposes, cash and cash equivalents are defined as the sum of “Cash and due from banks” which includes amounts on deposit with the Federal Reserve and “Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.”

In conjunction with applicable accounting standards, all material subsequent events have been either recognized in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosed in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATE

ASU 2011-11 — Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The ASU amends Topic 210 by requiring additional improved information to be disclosed regarding financial instruments and derivative instruments that are offset in accordance with the conditions under ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 810-10-45 or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments are effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The disclosures required by the amendments were applied retrospectively for all comparative periods presented (See Note 14). The amendments did not have a material impact on Huntington’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2013-01— Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities . The ASU amends Update 2011-11 to clarify that the scope applies to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or subject to master netting or similar arrangements. Other types of financial assets and liabilities subject to master netting or similar arrangements are not subject to the disclosure requirements in Update 2011-11. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods (See Note 14). The amendments did not have a material impact on Huntington’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2013-02— Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The ASU requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. The amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012 (See Note 8). The amendments did not have a material impact on Huntington’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

ASU 2013-11— Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. The ASU requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. However, if a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The amendments will not have a material impact on Huntington’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3. LOANS / LEASES AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

Loans and leases for which Huntington has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until maturity or payoff, are classified in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as loans and leases. Except for loans which are accounted for at fair value, loans and leases are carried at the principal amount outstanding, net of unamortized deferred loan origination fees and costs and net of unearned income. At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of these net unamortized deferred loan origination fees and costs and net unearned income was $174.8 million and $174.5 million, respectively.

71


Table of Contents

Loan and Lease Portfolio Composition

The following table provides a detailed listing of Huntington’s loan and lease portfolio at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

June 30, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Loans and leases:

Commercial and industrial

$ 17,112,784 $ 16,970,689

Commercial real estate

4,892,443 5,399,240

Automobile

5,810,103 4,633,820

Home equity

8,369,226 8,335,342

Residential mortgage

5,167,843 4,969,672

Other consumer

387,448 419,662

Loans and leases

41,739,847 40,728,425

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(733,076 ) (769,075 )

Net loans and leases

$ 41,006,771 $ 39,959,350

As shown in the table above, the primary loan and lease portfolios are: C&I, CRE, automobile, home equity, residential mortgage, and other consumer. For ACL purposes, these portfolios are further disaggregated into classes. The classes within each portfolio are as follows:

Portfolio

Class

Commercial and industrial Owner occupied
Purchased credit-impaired
Other commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate Retail properties
Multi family
Office
Industrial and warehouse
Purchased credit-impaired
Other commercial real estate
Automobile NA (1)
Home equity Secured by first-lien
Secured by junior-lien
Residential mortgage Residential mortgage
Purchased credit-impaired
Other consumer Other consumer
Purchased credit-impaired

(1) Not applicable. The automobile loan portfolio is not further segregated into classes.

Fidelity Bank acquisition

(See Note 19 for additional information regarding the Fidelity Bank acquisition).

On March 30, 2012, Huntington acquired the loans of Fidelity Bank located in Dearborn, Michigan from the FDIC. Under the agreement, loans with a fair value of $523.9 million were transferred to Huntington. These loans were recorded at fair value in accordance with applicable accounting guidance, ASC 805. The fair values for the loans were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms (Level 3), and reflected an estimate of probable losses and the credit risk associated with the loans.

72


Table of Contents

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans

Purchased loans with evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination for which it is probable at acquisition that we will be unable to collect all contractually required payments are considered to be credit impaired. Purchased credit-impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value, which is estimated by discounting the cash flows expected to be collected at the acquisition date. Because the estimate of expected cash flows reflects an estimate of future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loans, an allowance for credit losses is not recorded at the acquisition date. The excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value, referred to as the accretable yield, is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loan, or pool of loans, on a level-yield basis. The difference between the contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. A subsequent decrease in the estimate of cash flows expected to be received on purchased credit-impaired loans generally results in the recognition of an allowance for credit losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows result in reversal of any nonaccretable difference (or allowance for loan and lease losses to the extent any has been recorded) with a positive impact on interest income subsequently recognized. The measurement of cash flows involves assumptions and judgments for interest rates, prepayments, default rates, loss severity, and collateral values. All of these factors are inherently subjective and significant changes in the cash flow estimates over the life of the loan can result.

The following table presents a rollforward of the accretable yield for three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Balance, beginning of period

$ 35,160 $ 27,586 $ 23,251 $

Impact of acquisition/purchase on March 30, 2012

27,586

Additions

Accretion

(3,781 ) (2,825 ) (7,100 ) (2,825 )

Reclassification from nonaccretable difference

1,326 16,554

Balance, end of period

$ 32,705 $ 24,761 $ 32,705 $ 24,761

In the 2013 second quarter, $2.3 million of provision for credit losses expense was recorded on the purchased impaired loan portfolio. At June 30, 2013, there was $2.3 million of allowance for loan losses recorded on the purchased impaired loan portfolio. The following table reflects the outstanding balance of all contractually required payments and carrying amounts of the acquired loans at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Ending
Balance
Unpaid
Balance
Ending
Balance
Unpaid
Balance

Commercial and industrial

$ 50,246 $ 72,766 $ 54,472 $ 80,294

Commercial real estate

106,193 191,632 126,923 226,093

Residential mortgage

2,051 3,531 2,243 4,104

Other consumer

131 232 140 245

Total

$ 158,621 $ 268,161 $ 183,778 $ 310,736

73


Table of Contents

Loan and Lease Purchases and Sales

The following table summarizes significant portfolio loan and lease purchase and sale activity for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Commercial Commercial Home Residential Other
(dollar amounts in thousands) and Industrial Real Estate Automobile Equity Mortgage Consumer Total

Portfolio loans and leases purchased during the:

Three-month period ended June 30, 2013

$ 34,196 $ $ $ $ $ $ 34,196

Six-month period ended June 30, 2013

$ 55,737 $ $ $ $ $ $ 55,737

Three-month period ended June 30, 2012

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Six-month period ended June 30, 2012

$ 477,501 $ 378,122 $ $ 13,025 $ 62,324 $ 85 $ 931,057

Portfolio loans and leases sold or transferred to loans held for sale during the:

Three-month period ended June 30, 2013

$ 55,464 $ 87 $ $ $ 151,013 $ $ 206,564

Six-month period ended June 30, 2013

$ 83,066 $ 3,991 $ $ $ 155,403 $ 242,460

Three-month period ended June 30, 2012

$ 71,718 $ 26,273 $ 1,483,748 $ $ 179,621 $ $ 1,761,360

Six-month period ended June 30, 2012

$ 125,165 $ 47,742 $ 2,783,748 $ $ 179,621 $ $ 3,136,276

NALs and Past Due Loans

Loans are considered past due when the contractual amounts due with respect to principal and interest are not received within 30 days of the contractual due date.

Any loan in any portfolio may be placed on nonaccrual status prior to the policies described below when collection of principal or interest is in doubt. When a borrower with debt is discharged in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy and not reaffirmed by the borrower, the loan is determined to be collateral dependent and placed on nonaccrual status.

All classes within the C&I and CRE portfolios (except for purchased credit-impaired loans) are placed on nonaccrual status at 90-days past due. Residential mortgage loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 150-days past due, with the exception of residential mortgages guaranteed by government organizations which continue to accrue interest at the rate guaranteed by the government agency. First-lien home equity loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 150-days past due. Junior-lien home equity loans are placed on nonaccrual status at the earlier of 120-days past due or when the related first-lien loan has been identified as nonaccrual. Automobile and other consumer loans are generally charged-off when the loan is 120-days past due.

For all classes within all loan portfolios, when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, any accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals charged to interest income, and prior year amounts charged-off as a credit loss.

For all classes within all loan portfolios, cash receipts received on NALs are applied entirely against principal until the loan or lease has been collected in full, after which time any additional cash receipts are recognized as interest income. However, for secured non-reaffirmed debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, payments are applied to principal and interest when the borrower has demonstrated a capacity to continue payment of the debt and collection of the debt is reasonably assured. For unsecured non-reaffirmed debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy where the carrying value has been fully charged-off, payments are recorded as loan recoveries.

Regarding all classes within the C&I and CRE portfolios, the determination of a borrower’s ability to make the required principal and interest payments is based on an examination of the borrower’s current financial statements, industry, management capabilities, and other qualitative measures. For all classes within the consumer loan portfolio, the determination of a borrower’s ability to make the required principal and interest payments is based on multiple factors, including number of days past due and, in some instances, an evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition. When, in Management’s judgment, the borrower’s ability to make required principal and interest payments resumes and collectability is no longer in doubt, the loan or lease is returned to accrual status. For these loans that have been returned to accrual status, cash receipts are applied according to the contractual terms of the loan.

74


Table of Contents

The following table presents NALs by loan class at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

2013 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

June 30, December 31,

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 48,021 $ 53,009

Other commercial and industrial

32,016 37,696

Total commercial and industrial

$ 80,037 $ 90,705

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 31,353 $ 31,791

Multi family

13,231 19,765

Office

27,486 30,341

Industrial and warehouse

3,211 6,841

Other commercial real estate

18,362 38,390

Total commercial real estate

$ 93,643 $ 127,128

Automobile

$ 7,743 $ 7,823

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 28,409 $ 27,091

Secured by junior-lien

31,674 32,434

Total home equity

$ 60,083 $ 59,525

Residential mortgage

$ 122,040 $ 122,452

Other consumer

$ $

Total nonaccrual loans

$ 363,546 $ 407,633

75


Table of Contents

The following table presents an aging analysis of loans and leases, including past due loans, by loan class at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012: (1)

June 30, 2013

90 or more
Past Due Total Loans days past due
(dollar amounts in thousands) 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 or more days Total Current and Leases and accruing

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 10,243 $ 4,479 $ 32,793 $ 47,515 $ 4,323,352 $ 4,370,867 $

Purchased credit-impaired

1,392 1,420 24,851 27,663 22,583 50,246 24,851

Other commercial and industrial

12,508 6,562 13,493 32,563 12,659,108 12,691,671

Total commercial and industrial

$ 24,143 $ 12,461 $ 71,137 $ 107,741 $ 17,005,043 $ 17,112,784 $ 24,851 (2)

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 3,620 $ 286 $ 6,847 $ 10,753 $ 1,249,009 $ 1,259,762 $

Multi family

10,636 866 9,394 20,896 932,519 953,415

Office

6,428 2,194 21,374 29,996 901,880 931,876

Industrial and warehouse

1,022 2,102 1,499 4,623 536,273 540,896

Purchased credit-impaired

4,824 1,257 45,051 51,132 55,061 106,193 45,051

Other commercial real estate

5,250 404 9,374 15,028 1,085,273 1,100,301

Total commercial real estate

$ 31,780 $ 7,109 $ 93,539 $ 132,428 $ 4,760,015 $ 4,892,443 $ 45,051 (2)

Automobile

$ 30,814 5,584 $ 3,442 $ 39,840 $ 5,770,263 $ 5,810,103 $ 3,392

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 17,666 $ 6,676 $ 28,088 $ 52,430 $ 4,588,234 $ 4,640,664 $ 4,806

Secured by junior-lien

31,764 10,735 31,141 73,640 3,654,922 3,728,562 9,439

Total home equity

$ 49,430 $ 17,411 $ 59,229 $ 126,070 $ 8,243,156 $ 8,369,226 $ 14,245

Residential mortgage:

Residential mortgage

$ 135,161 $ 48,260 $ 164,750 $ 348,171 $ 4,817,622 $ 5,165,793 $ 92,245 (3)

Purchased credit-impaired

106 234 340 1,710 2,050 107

Total residential mortgage

$ 135,267 $ 48,260 $ 164,984 $ 348,511 $ 4,819,332 $ 5,167,843 $ 92,352

Other consumer:

Other consumer

$ 5,075 $ 959 $ 1,367 $ 7,401 $ 379,916 $ 387,317 $ 1,367

Purchased credit-impaired

69 69 62 131

Total other consumer

$ 5,144 $ 959 $ 1,367 $ 7,470 $ 379,978 $ 387,448 $ 1,367

Total loans and leases

$ 276,580 $ 91,784 $ 393,697 $ 762,062 $ 40,977,785 $ 41,739,847 $ 181,258

76


Table of Contents

December 31, 2012

90 or more
Past Due Total Loans days past due
(dollar amounts in thousands) 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 or more days Total Current and Leases and accruing

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 11,409 $ 6,302 $ 31,997 $ 49,708 $ 4,236,211 $ 4,285,919 $

Purchased credit-impaired

986 3,533 26,648 31,167 23,305 54,472 26,648

Other commercial and industrial

20,273 4,211 14,786 39,270 12,591,028 12,630,298

Total commercial and industrial

$ 32,668 $ 14,046 $ 73,431 $ 120,145 $ 16,850,544 $ 16,970,689 $ 26,648

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 3,459 $ 4,203 $ 9,677 $ 17,339 $ 1,413,520 $ 1,430,859 $

Multi family

7,961 1,314 12,062 21,337 963,063 984,400

Office

1,054 2,415 23,335 26,804 909,310 936,114

Industrial and warehouse

6,597 118 5,433 12,148 584,754 596,902

Purchased credit-impaired

556 1,751 56,660 58,967 67,956 126,923 56,660

Other commercial real estate

2,725 2,192 25,463 30,380 1,293,662 1,324,042

Total commercial real estate

$ 22,352 $ 11,993 $ 132,630 $ 166,975 $ 5,232,265 $ 5,399,240 $ 56,660

Automobile

$ 36,267 $ 7,803 $ 4,438 $ 48,508 $ 4,585,312 $ 4,633,820 $ 4,418

Home equity

Secured by first-lien

$ 26,288 $ 9,992 $ 28,322 $ 64,602 $ 4,315,985 $ 4,380,587 $ 5,202

Secured by junior-lien

34,365 16,553 35,150 86,068 3,868,687 3,954,755 12,998

Total home equity

$ 60,653 $ 26,545 $ 63,472 $ 150,670 $ 8,184,672 $ 8,335,342 $ 18,200

Residential mortgage

Residential mortgage

$ 118,582 $ 44,747 $ 164,035 $ 327,364 $ 4,640,065 $ 4,967,429 $ 92,925 (4)

Purchased credit-impaired

58 609 667 1,576 2,243 609

Total residential mortgage

$ 118,640 $ 44,747 $ 164,644 $ 328,031 $ 4,641,641 $ 4,969,672 $ 93,534

Other consumer

Other consumer

$ 7,431 $ 2,117 $ 1,672 $ 11,220 $ 408,302 $ 419,522 $ 1,672

Purchased credit-impaired

76 76 64 140

Total other consumer

$ 7,431 $ 2,193 $ 1,672 $ 11,296 $ 408,366 $ 419,662 $ 1,672

Total loans and leases

$ 278,011 $ 107,327 $ 440,287 $ 825,625 $ 39,902,800 $ 40,728,425 $ 201,132

(1) NALs are included in this aging analysis based on the loan’s past due status.
(2) All amounts represent accruing purchased impaired loans related to the FDIC-assisted Fidelity Bank acquisition. Under the applicable accounting guidance (ASC 310-30), the loans were recorded at fair value upon acquisition and remain in accruing status.
(3) Includes $87,135 thousand guaranteed by the U.S. government.
(4) Includes $90,816 thousand guaranteed by the U.S. government.

77


Table of Contents

Allowance for Credit Losses

Huntington maintains two reserves, both of which reflect Management’s judgment regarding the appropriate level necessary to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio: the ALLL and the AULC. Combined, these reserves comprise the total ACL. The determination of the ACL requires significant estimates, including the timing and amounts of expected future cash flows on impaired loans and leases, consideration of current economic conditions, and historical loss experience pertaining to pools of homogeneous loans and leases, all of which may be susceptible to change.

The appropriateness of the ACL is based on Management’s current judgments about the credit quality of the loan portfolio. These judgments consider on-going evaluations of the loan and lease portfolio, including such factors as the differing economic risks associated with each loan category, the financial condition of specific borrowers, the level of delinquent loans, the value of any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or other documented support. Further, Management evaluates the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on the ability of borrowers to meet their financial obligations when quantifying our exposure to credit losses and assessing the appropriateness of our ACL at each reporting date. In addition to general economic conditions and the other factors described above, additional factors also considered include: the impact of declining residential real estate values; the diversification of CRE loans; the development of new or expanded Commercial business segments such as healthcare, ABL, and energy, and the overall condition of the manufacturing industry. Also, the ACL assessment includes the on-going assessment of credit quality metrics, and a comparison of certain ACL benchmarks to current performance. Management’s determinations regarding the appropriateness of the ACL are reviewed and approved by the Company’s board of directors.

The ALLL consists of two components: (1) the transaction reserve, which includes a loan level allocation per ASC 310-10, specific reserves related to loans considered to be impaired, and loans involved in troubled debt restructurings allocated per ASC 310-40, and (2) the general reserve. The transaction reserve component includes both (1) an estimate of loss based on pools of commercial and consumer loans and leases with similar characteristics and (2) an estimate of loss based on an impairment review of each impaired C&I and CRE loan greater than $1.0 million. For the C&I and CRE portfolios, the estimate of loss based on pools of loans and leases with similar characteristics is made by applying a PD factor and a LGD factor to each individual loan based on a continuously updated loan grade, using a standardized loan grading system. The PD factor and an LGD factor are determined for each loan grade using statistical models based on historical performance data. The PD factor considers on-going reviews of the financial performance of the specific borrower, including cash flow, debt-service coverage ratio, earnings power, debt level, and equity position, in conjunction with an assessment of the borrower’s industry and future prospects. The LGD factor considers analysis of the type of collateral and the relative LTV ratio. These reserve factors are developed based on credit migration models that track historical movements of loans between loan ratings over time and a combination of long-term average loss experience of our own portfolio and external industry data using a 24-month emergence period.

In the case of more homogeneous portfolios, such as automobile loans, home equity loans, and residential mortgage loans, the determination of the transaction reserve also incorporates PD and LGD factors. The estimate of loss is based on pools of loans and leases with similar characteristics. The PD factor considers current credit scores unless the account is delinquent, in which case a higher PD factor is used. The credit score provides a basis for understanding the borrowers past and current payment performance, and this information is used to estimate expected losses over the 12-month emergence period. The performance of first-lien loans ahead of our junior-lien loans is available to use as part of our updated score process. The LGD factor considers analysis of the type of collateral and the relative LTV ratio. Credit scores, models, analyses, and other factors used to determine both the PD and LGD factors are updated frequently to capture the recent behavioral characteristics of the subject portfolios, as well as any changes in loss mitigation or credit origination strategies, and adjustments to the reserve factors are made as required. Models utilized in the ALLL estimation process are subject to the Company’s model validation policies.

The general reserve consists of the economic reserve and risk-profile reserve components. The economic reserve component considers the potential impact of changing market and economic conditions on portfolio performance. The risk-profile component considers items unique to our structure, policies, processes, and portfolio composition, as well as qualitative measurements and assessments of the loan portfolios including, but not limited to, management quality, concentrations, portfolio composition, industry comparisons, and internal review functions.

The estimate for the AULC is determined using the same procedures and methodologies as used for the ALLL. The loss factors used in the AULC are the same as the loss factors used in the ALLL while also considering a historical utilization of unused commitments. The AULC is reflected in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The ACL is increased through a provision for credit losses that is charged to earnings, based on Management’s quarterly evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, and is reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries, and the ACL associated with securitized or sold loans. There were no material changes in assumptions or estimation techniques compared with prior periods that impacted the determination of the current period’s ALLL and AULC.

78


Table of Contents

The following table presents ALLL and AULC activity by portfolio segment for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Commercial Commercial Home Residential Other
(dollar amounts in thousands) and Industrial Real Estate Automobile Equity Mortgage Consumer Total

Three-month period ended June 30, 2013:

ALLL balance, beginning of period

$ 238,098 $ 267,436 $ 35,973 $ 115,858 $ 63,062 $ 26,342 $ 746,769

Loan charge-offs

(8,981 ) (14,194 ) (5,219 ) (17,766 ) (9,692 ) (7,386 ) (63,238 )

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off

7,395 11,810 3,756 3,112 1,072 1,303 28,448

Provision for loan and lease losses

(2,833 ) (9,203 ) 5,480 14,422 9,617 3,871 21,354

Allowance for loans sold or transferred to loans held for sale

(257 ) (257 )

ALLL balance, end of period

$ 233,679 $ 255,849 $ 39,990 $ 115,626 $ 63,802 $ 24,130 $ 733,076

AULC balance, beginning of period

$ 33,835 $ 4,404 $ $ 1,912 $ 6 $ 698 $ 40,855

Provision for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

3,636 4 (224 ) (48 ) 3,368

AULC balance, end of period

$ 37,471 $ 4,408 $ $ 1,688 $ 6 $ 650 $ 44,223

ACL balance, end of period

$ 271,150 $ 260,257 $ 39,990 $ 117,314 $ 63,808 $ 24,780 $ 777,299

Six-month period ended June 30, 2013:

ALLL balance, beginning of period

$ 241,051 $ 285,369 $ 34,979 $ 118,764 $ 61,658 $ 27,254 $ 769,075

Loan charge-offs

(21,994 ) (36,561 ) (10,907 ) (44,298 ) (17,593 ) (16,027 ) (147,380 )

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off

17,091 21,400 6,850 9,661 2,825 3,076 60,903

Provision for loan and lease losses

(2,469 ) (14,359 ) 9,068 31,499 17,176 9,827 50,742

Allowance for loans sold or transferred to loans held for sale

(264 ) (264 )

ALLL balance, end of period

$ 233,679 $ 255,849 $ 39,990 $ 115,626 $ 63,802 $ 24,130 $ 733,076

AULC balance, beginning of period

$ 33,868 $ 4,740 $ $ 1,356 $ 3 $ 684 $ 40,651

Provision for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

3,603 (332 ) 332 3 (34 ) 3,572

AULC balance, end of period

$ 37,471 $ 4,408 $ $ 1,688 $ 6 $ 650 $ 44,223

ACL balance, end of period

$ 271,150 $ 260,257 $ 39,990 $ 117,314 $ 63,808 $ 24,780 $ 777,299

79


Table of Contents
Commercial Commercial Home Residential Other
(dollar amounts in thousands) and Industrial Real Estate Automobile Equity Mortgage Consumer Total

Three-month period ended June 30, 2012:

ALLL balance, beginning of period

$ 246,026 $ 339,494 $ 36,552 $ 168,898 $ 89,129 $ 32,970 $ 913,069

Loan charge-offs

(23,718 ) (35,747 ) (4,999 ) (23,083 ) (11,903 ) (8,642 ) (108,092 )

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off

8,040 6,569 4,550 2,038 1,117 1,533 23,847

Provision for loan and lease losses

50,200 (4,925 ) (1,446 ) (12,291 ) 886 4,052 36,476

Allowance for loans sold or transferred to loans held for sale

(4,440 ) (1,214 ) (5,654 )

ALLL balance, end of period

$ 280,548 $ 305,391 $ 30,217 $ 135,562 $ 78,015 $ 29,913 $ 859,646

AULC balance, beginning of period

$ 42,276 $ 5,780 $ $ 2,108 $ 1 $ 769 $ 50,934

Provision for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

568 (555 ) 82 3 (54 ) 44

AULC balance, end of period

$ 42,844 $ 5,225 $ $ 2,190 $ 4 $ 715 $ 50,978

ACL balance, end of period

$ 323,392 $ 310,616 $ 30,217 $ 137,752 $ 78,019 $ 30,628 $ 910,624

Six-month period ended June 30, 2012:

ALLL balance, beginning of period

$ 275,367 $ 388,706 $ 38,282 $ 143,873 $ 87,194 $ 31,406 $ 964,828

Loan charge-offs

(57,224 ) (57,149 ) (12,609 ) (48,348 ) (23,648 ) (17,074 ) (216,052 )

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off

13,051 17,465 9,082 3,574 2,292 3,351 48,815

Provision for loan and lease losses

49,354 (43,631 ) 597 36,463 13,391 12,230 68,404

Allowance for loans sold or transferred to loans held for sale

(5,135 ) (1,214 ) (6,349 )

ALLL balance, end of period

$ 280,548 $ 305,391 $ 30,217 $ 135,562 $ 78,015 $ 29,913 $ 859,646

AULC balance, beginning of period

$ 39,658 $ 5,852 $ $ 2,134 $ 1 $ 811 $ 48,456

Provision for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

3,186 (627 ) 56 3 (96 ) 2,522

AULC balance, end of period

$ 42,844 $ 5,225 $ $ 2,190 $ 4 $ 715 $ 50,978

ACL balance, end of period

$ 323,392 $ 310,616 $ 30,217 $ 137,752 $ 78,019 $ 30,628 $ 910,624

Any loan in any portfolio may be charged-off prior to the policies described below if a loss confirming event has occurred. Loss confirming events include, but are not limited to, bankruptcy (unsecured), continued delinquency, foreclosure, or receipt of an asset valuation indicating a collateral deficiency and that asset is the sole source of repayment. Additionally, discharged, collateral dependent non-reaffirmed debt in Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings will result in a charge-off to estimated collateral value, less anticipated selling costs.

C&I and CRE loans are either charged-off or written down to net realizable value at 90-days past due. Automobile loans and other consumer loans are charged-off at 120-days past due. First-lien and junior-lien home equity loans are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, at 150-days past due and 120-days past due, respectively. Residential mortgages are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, at 150-days past due.

80


Table of Contents

Credit Quality Indicators

To facilitate the monitoring of credit quality for C&I and CRE loans, and for purposes of determining an appropriate ACL level for these loans, Huntington utilizes the following categories of credit grades:

Pass = Higher quality loans that do not fit any of the other categories described below.

OLEM = The credit risk may be relatively minor yet represent a risk given certain specific circumstances. If the potential weaknesses are not monitored or mitigated, the loan may weaken or inadequately protect Huntington’s position in the future. For these reasons, Huntington considers the loans to be potential problem loans.

Substandard = Inadequately protected loans by the borrower’s ability to repay, equity, and/or the collateral pledged to secure the loan. These loans have identified weaknesses that could hinder normal repayment or collection of the debt. It is likely Huntington will sustain some loss if any identified weaknesses are not mitigated.

Doubtful = Loans that have all of the weaknesses inherent in those loans classified as Substandard, with the added elements of the full collection of the loan is improbable and that the possibility of loss is high.

The categories above, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions, are assigned upon initial approval of the loan or lease and subsequently updated as appropriate.

Commercial loans categorized as OLEM, Substandard, or Doubtful are considered Criticized loans. Commercial loans categorized as Substandard or Doubtful are also considered Classified loans.

For all classes within all consumer loan portfolios, each loan is assigned a specific PD factor that is partially based on the borrower’s most recent credit bureau score (FICO), which we update quarterly. A FICO credit bureau score is a credit score developed by Fair Isaac Corporation based on data provided by the credit bureaus. The FICO credit bureau score is widely accepted as the standard measure of consumer credit risk used by lenders, regulators, rating agencies, and consumers. The higher the FICO credit bureau score, the higher likelihood of repayment and therefore, an indicator of higher credit quality.

Huntington assesses the risk in the loan portfolio by utilizing numerous risk characteristics. The classifications described above, and also presented in the table below, represent one of those characteristics that are closely monitored in the overall credit risk management processes. The table below shows an increase in FICO scores less than 650 for the automobile portfolio, and to a lesser degree, the home equity and residential mortgage portfolios. These increases are proportional to growth in the portfolio and do not reflect a deterioration in asset quality for the portfolios, as other risk characteristics mitigate any increased level of risk associated with the FICO score distribution.

81


Table of Contents

The following table presents each loan and lease class by credit quality indicator at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

June 30, 2013
Credit Risk Profile by UCS classification

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pass OLEM Substandard Doubtful Total

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 4,019,839 $ 156,690 $ 193,794 $ 544 $ 4,370,867

Purchased credit-impaired

5,447 2,499 42,300 50,246

Other commercial and industrial

12,208,553 130,952 351,468 698 12,691,671

Total commercial and industrial

$ 16,233,839 $ 290,141 $ 587,562 $ 1,242 $ 17,112,784

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 1,096,592 $ 22,079 $ 141,091 $ $ 1,259,762

Multi family

896,219 15,029 42,052 115 953,415

Office

827,692 15,667 88,483 34 931,876

Industrial and warehouse

491,788 11,688 37,420 540,896

Purchased credit-impaired

15,637 8,457 81,368 731 106,193

Other commercial real estate

995,884 15,287 88,882 248 1,100,301

Total commercial real estate

$ 4,323,812 $ 88,207 $ 479,296 $ 1,128 $ 4,892,443

Credit Risk Profile by FICO score (1)
750+ 650-749 <650 Other (2) Total

Automobile

$ 2,598,464 $ 2,231,028 $ 819,828 $ 160,783 $ 5,810,103

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 2,915,640 $ 1,384,432 $ 294,703 $ 45,889 $ 4,640,664

Secured by junior-lien

1,899,341 1,305,376 456,991 66,854 3,728,562

Total home equity

$ 4,814,981 $ 2,689,808 $ 751,694 $ 112,743 $ 8,369,226

Residential mortgage:

Residential mortgage

$ 2,702,524 $ 1,664,577 $ 720,024 $ 78,667 $ 5,165,792

Purchased credit-impaired

429 1,126 341 155 2,051

Total residential mortgage

$ 2,702,953 $ 1,665,703 $ 720,365 $ 78,822 $ 5,167,843

Other consumer:

Other consumer

$ 154,863 $ 151,411 $ 48,614 $ 32,429 $ 387,317

Purchased credit-impaired

90 41 131

Total other consumer

$ 154,863 $ 151,501 $ 48,655 $ 32,429 $ 387,448

December 31, 2012
Credit Risk Profile by UCS classification

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pass OLEM Substandard Doubtful Total

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 3,970,597 $ 108,731 $ 205,822 $ 769 $ 4,285,919

Purchased credit-impaired

1,663 6,555 46,254 54,472

Other commercial and industrial

12,146,017 145,111 337,805 1,365 12,630,298

Total commercial and industrial

$ 16,118,277 $ 260,397 $ 589,881 $ 2,134 $ 16,970,689

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 1,184,987 $ 63,976 $ 181,896 $ $ 1,430,859

Multi family

902,616 24,098 57,548 138 984,400

Office

826,533 26,488 83,093 936,114

Industrial and warehouse

540,484 15,132 41,286 596,902

Purchased credit-impaired

10,052 18,085 98,786 126,923

Other commercial real estate

1,177,213 43,454 103,262 113 1,324,042

Total commercial real estate

$ 4,641,885 $ 191,233 $ 565,871 $ 251 $ 5,399,240

82


Table of Contents
Credit Risk Profile by FICO score (1)
750+ 650-749 <650 Other (2) Total

Automobile

$ 2,233,439 $ 1,900,824 $ 682,518 $ 117,039 $ 4,933,820 (3)

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 2,618,888 $ 1,345,621 $ 357,019 $ 59,059 $ 4,380,587

Secured by junior-lien

2,046,143 1,375,636 491,226 41,750 3,954,755

Total home equity

$ 4,665,031 $ 2,721,257 $ 848,245 $ 100,809 $ 8,335,342

Residential mortgage

Residential mortgage

$ 2,561,210 $ 1,673,485 $ 711,750 $ 20,984 $ 4,967,429

Purchased credit-impaired

373 1,303 567 2,243

Total residential mortgage

$ 2,561,583 $ 1,674,788 $ 712,317 $ 20,984 $ 4,969,672

Other consumer

Other consumer

$ 169,792 $ 167,389 $ 59,815 $ 22,526 $ 419,522

Purchased credit-impaired

93 47 140

Total other consumer

$ 169,792 $ 167,482 $ 59,862 $ 22,526 $ 419,662

(1) Reflects currently updated customer credit scores.
(2) Reflects deferred fees and costs, loans in process, loans to legal entities, etc.
(3) Included $0.3 billion of loans reflected as loans held for sale related to an automobile securitization expected to be completed in 2013. During the 2013 second quarter, this amount was transferred from loans held for sale to the automobile portfolio based on Management’s intent and ability to hold these loans for the foreseeable future.

83


Table of Contents

Impaired Loans

For all classes within the C&I and CRE portfolios, all loans with an outstanding balance of $1.0 million or greater are evaluated on a quarterly basis for impairment. Generally, consumer loans within any class are not individually evaluated on a regular basis for impairment. All TDRs, regardless of the outstanding balance amount, are also considered to be impaired. Loans acquired with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination for which it is probable at acquisition that all contractually required payments will not be collected are also considered to be impaired.

Once a loan has been identified for an assessment of impairment, the loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. This determination requires significant judgment and use of estimates, and the eventual outcome may differ significantly from those estimates.

When a loan in any class has been determined to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is measured using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, the observable market price of the loan, or the fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. When the present value of expected future cash flows is used, the effective interest rate is the original contractual interest rate of the loan adjusted for any premium or discount. When the contractual interest rate is variable, the effective interest rate of the loan changes over time. A specific reserve is established as a component of the ALLL when a loan has been determined to be impaired. Subsequent to the initial measurement of impairment, if there is a significant change to the impaired loan’s expected future cash flows, or if actual cash flows are significantly different from the cash flows previously estimated, Huntington recalculates the impairment and appropriately adjusts the specific reserve. Similarly, if Huntington measures impairment based on the observable market price of an impaired loan or the fair value of the collateral of an impaired collateral dependent loan, Huntington will adjust the specific reserve.

When a loan within any class is impaired, the accrual of interest income is discontinued unless the receipt of principal and interest is no longer in doubt. Interest income on TDRs is accrued when all principal and interest is expected to be collected under the post-modification terms. Cash receipts received on nonaccruing impaired loans within any class are generally applied entirely against principal until the loan has been collected in full, after which time any additional cash receipts are recognized as interest income. Cash receipts received on accruing impaired loans within any class are applied in the same manner as accruing loans that are not considered impaired.

84


Table of Contents

The following tables present the balance of the ALLL attributable to loans by portfolio segment individually and collectively evaluated for impairment and the related loan and lease balance at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Commercial Commercial Residential Other
(dollar amounts in thousands) and Industrial Real Estate Automobile Home Equity Mortgage Consumer Total

ALLL at June 30, 2013:

Portion of ALLL balance:

Attributable to purchased credit-impaired loans

$ 917 $ 1,411 $ $ $ $ $ 2,328

Attributable to loans individually evaluated for impairment

13,723 28,831 890 4,474 12,565 177 60,660

Attributable to loans collectively evaluated for impairment

219,039 225,607 39,100 111,152 51,237 23,953 670,088

Total ALLL balance

$ 233,679 $ 255,849 $ 39,990 $ 115,626 $ 63,802 $ 24,130 $ 733,076

Loan and Lease Ending Balances at June 30, 2013:

Portion of loan and lease ending balance:

Attributable to purchased credit-impaired loans

$ 50,246 $ 106,193 $ $ $ 2,051 $ 131 $ 158,621

Individually evaluated for impairment

132,197 244,870 40,511 145,987 374,496 3,383 941,444

Collectively evaluated for impairment

16,930,341 4,541,380 5,769,592 8,223,239 4,791,296 383,934 40,639,782

Total loans and leases evaluated for impairment

$ 17,112,784 $ 4,892,443 $ 5,810,103 $ 8,369,226 $ 5,167,843 $ 387,448 $ 41,739,847

85


Table of Contents
(dollar amounts in thousands) Commercial and
Industrial
Commercial
Real Estate
Automobile Home
Equity
Residential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Total

ALLL at December 31, 2012

Portion of ALLL balance:

Attributable to purchased credit-impaired loans

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Attributable to loans individually evaluated for impairment

11,694 31,133 1,446 4,783 14,176 213 63,445

Attributable to loans collectively evaluated for impairment

229,357 254,236 33,533 113,981 47,482 27,041 705,630

Total ALLL balance:

$ 241,051 $ 285,369 $ 34,979 $ 118,764 $ 61,658 $ 27,254 $ 769,075

Loan and Lease Ending Balances at December 31, 2012

Portion of loan and lease ending balances:

Attributable to purchased credit-impaired loans

$ 54,472 $ 126,923 $ $ $ 2,243 $ 140 $ 183,778

Individually evaluated for impairment

119,535 298,891 43,607 117,532 374,526 2,657 956,748

Collectively evaluated for impairment

16,796,682 4,973,426 4,590,213 8,217,810 4,592,903 416,865 39,587,899

Total loans and leases evaluated for impairment

$ 16,970,689 $ 5,399,240 $ 4,633,820 $ 8,335,342 $ 4,969,672 $ 419,662 $ 40,728,425

86


Table of Contents

The following tables present by class the ending, unpaid principal balance, and the related ALLL, along with the average balance and interest income recognized only for loans and leases individually evaluated for impairment and purchased credit-impaired loans: (1), (2)

June 30, 2013 Three Months Ended
June 30, 2013
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Ending
Balance
Unpaid
Principal
Balance (5)
Related
Allowance
Average
Balance
Interest
Income
Recognized
Average
Balance
Interest
Income
Recognized

With no related allowance recorded:

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 5,556 $ 5,995 $ $ 4,668 $ 42 $ 4,204 $ 84

Purchased credit-impaired

Other commercial and industrial

17,177 29,088 6,603 71 11,456 306

Total commercial and industrial

$ 22,733 $ 35,083 $ $ 11,271 $ 113 $ 15,660 $ 390

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 37,593 $ 39,009 $ $ 48,806 $ 606 $ 51,522 $ 1,310

Multi family

4,206 4,324 4,662 70 5,152 158

Office

9,240 13,916 12,473 311 15,161 531

Industrial and warehouse

10,470 11,592 10,625 152 12,560 349

Purchased credit-impaired

Other commercial real estate

7,223 8,928 9,250 127 9,764 224

Total commercial real estate

$ 68,732 $ 77,769 $ $ 85,816 $ 1,266 $ 94,159 $ 2,572

Automobile

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Secured by junior-lien

Total home equity

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Residential mortgage:

Residential mortgage

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Purchased credit-impaired

2,051 3,531 2,200 49 2,214 92

Total residential mortgage

$ 2,051 $ 3,531 $ $ 2,200 $ 49 $ 2,214 $ 92

Other consumer

Other consumer

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Purchased credit-impaired

131 232 144 3 143 6

Total other consumer

$ 131 $ 232 $ $ 144 $ 3 $ 143 $ 6

With an allowance recorded:

Commercial and industrial: (3)

Owner occupied

$ 39,375 $ 45,050 $ 4,416 $ 42,193 $ 340 $ 43,158 $ 691

Purchased credit-impaired

50,246 72,766 917 51,784 1,198 52,682 2,249

Other commercial and industrial

70,089 84,618 10,435 73,533 966 62,427 1,624

Total commercial and industrial

$ 159,710 $ 202,434 $ 15,768 $ 167,510 $ 2,504 $ 158,267 $ 4,564

Commercial real estate: (4)

Retail properties

$ 57,306 $ 84,816 $ 6,805 $ 53,584 $ 399 $ 54,780 $ 855

Multi family

13,690 15,293 2,264 15,058 154 15,961 331

Office

54,634 61,935 12,679 48,321 417 45,158 801

Industrial and warehouse

17,343 18,654 1,013 19,138 183 19,624 368

Purchased credit-impaired

106,193 191,632 1,411 112,163 2,531 117,083 4,753

Other commercial real estate

33,165 38,442 6,316 34,941 439 39,967 818

Total commercial real estate

$ 282,331 $ 410,772 $ 30,488 $ 283,205 $ 4,123 $ 292,573 $ 7,926

Automobile

$ 40,511 $ 42,055 $ 890 $ 40,830 $ 866 $ 41,756 $ 1,303

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 86,637 $ 89,320 $ 1,449 $ 99,684 $ 950 $ 91,875 $ 1,892

Secured by junior-lien

59,350 72,064 3,025 59,971 721 53,739 1,313

Total home equity

$ 145,987 $ 161,384 $ 4,474 $ 159,655 $ 1,671 $ 145,614 $ 3,205

Residential mortgage (6):

Residential mortgage

$ 374,496 $ 414,987 $ 12,565 $ 373,426 $ 2,870 $ 373,793 $ 5,742

Purchased credit-impaired

Total residential mortgage

$ 374,496 $ 414,987 $ 12,565 $ 373,426 $ 2,870 $ 373,793 $ 5,742

Other consumer:

Other consumer

$ 3,383 $ 3,383 $ 177 $ 2,948 $ 32 $ 2,851 $ 55

Purchased credit-impaired

Total other consumer

$ 3,383 $ 3,383 $ 177 $ 2,948 $ 32 $ 2,851 $ 55

87


Table of Contents
December 31, 2012 Three Months Ended
June 30, 2012
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Ending
Balance
Unpaid
Principal
Balance (5)
Related
Allowance
Average
Balance
Interest
Income
Recognized
Average
Balance
Interest
Income
Recognized

With no related allowance recorded:

Commercial and industrial:

Owner occupied

$ 1,050 $ 1,091 $ $ 8,038 $ 36 $ 5,614 $ 60

Purchased credit-impaired

54,472 80,294 70,641 832 70,641 832

Other commercial and industrial

31,841 54,520 11,114 162 8,196 255

Total commercial and industrial

$ 87,363 $ 135,905 $ $ 89,793 $ 1,030 $ 84,451 $ 1,147

Commercial real estate:

Retail properties

$ 54,216 $ 56,569 $ $ 54,861 $ 722 $ 51,532 $ 1,476

Multi family

5,719 5,862 6,033 96 6,112 193

Office

20,051 24,843 4,010 27 2,598 52

Industrial and warehouse

15,013 17,476 6,799 100 7,178 206

Purchased credit-impaired

126,923 226,093 174,299 1,950 174,299 1,950

Other commercial real estate

10,479 10,728 16,113 125 18,067 273

Total commercial real estate

$ 232,401 $ 341,571 $ $ 262,115 $ 3,020 $ 259,786 $ 4,150

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Secured by junior-lien

Total home equity

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Residential mortgage:

Residential mortgage

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Purchased credit-impaired

2,243 4,104 4,805 34 4,805 34

Total residential mortgage

$ 2,243 $ 4,104 $ $ 4,805 $ 34 $ 4,805 $ 34

Other consumer

Other consumer

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Purchased credit-impaired

140 245 864 9 864 9

Total other consumer

$ 140 $ 245 $ $ 864 $ 9 $ 864 $ 9

With an allowance recorded:

Commercial and industrial: (3)

Owner occupied

$ 46,266 $ 56,925 $ 5,730 $ 33,400 $ 293 $ 38,411 $ 695

Purchased credit-impaired

Other commercial and industrial

40,378 52,996 5,964 86,688 627 87,909 1,482

Total commercial and industrial

$ 86,644 $ 109,921 $ 11,694 $ 120,088 $ 920 $ 126,320 $ 2,177

Commercial real estate: (4)

Retail properties

$ 65,004 $ 73,000 $ 8,144 $ 118,628 $ 906 $ 121,163 $ 3,185

Multi family

17,410 18,531 2,662 25,288 206 31,312 828

Office

40,375 45,164 9,214 17,218 51 20,167 158

Industrial and warehouse

22,450 25,374 1,092 22,596 74 24,547 353

Purchased credit-impaired

Other commercial real estate

48,174 63,148 10,021 75,986 456 77,907 1,618

Total commercial real estate

$ 193,413 $ 225,217 $ 31,133 $ 259,716 $ 1,693 $ 275,096 $ 6,142

Automobile

$ 43,607 $ 44,790 $ 1,446 $ 34,991 $ 794 $ 35,518 $ 1,616

Home equity:

Secured by first-lien

$ 76,258 $ 80,831 $ 1,329 $ 47,568 $ 561 $ 43,659 $ 1,040

Secured by junior-lien

41,274 63,390 3,454 15,919 222 16,196 437

Total home equity

$ 117,532 $ 144,221 $ 4,783 $ 63,487 $ 783 $ 59,855 $ 1,477

Residential mortgage (6):

Residential mortgage

$ 374,526 $ 413,583 $ 14,176 $ 325,842 $ 2,866 $ 329,151 $ 5,803

Purchased credit-impaired

Total residential mortgage

$ 374,526 $ 413,583 $ 14,176 $ 325,842 $ 2,866 $ 329,151 $ 5,803

Other consumer:

Other consumer

$ 2,657 $ 2,657 $ 213 $ 3,748 $ 26 $ 4,572 $ 59

Purchased credit-impaired

Total other consumer

$ 2,657 $ 2,657 $ 213 $ 3,748 $ 26 $ 4,572 $ 59

88


Table of Contents
(1) These tables do not include loans fully charged-off.
(2) All automobile, home equity, residential mortgage, and other consumer impaired loans included in these tables are considered impaired due to their status as a TDR.
(3) At June 30, 2013, $41,644 thousand of the $109,464 thousand commercial and industrial loans with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR. At December 31, 2012, $44,265 thousand of the $86,644 thousand commercial and industrial loans with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR.
(4) At June 30, 2013, $30,865 thousand of the $176,138 thousand commercial real estate loans with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR. At December 31, 2012, $31,605 thousand of the $193,413 thousand commercial real estate loans with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR.
(5) The differences between the ending balance and unpaid principal balance amounts represent partial charge-offs.
(6) At June 30, 2013, $32,435 thousand of the $374,496 thousand residential mortgages loans with an allowance recorded were guaranteed by the U.S. government. At December 31, 2012, $28,695 thousand of the $374,526 thousand residential mortgage loans with an allowance recorded were guaranteed by the U.S. government.

TDR Loans

TDRs are modified loans where a concession was provided to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. Loan modifications are considered TDRs when the concessions provided are not available to the borrower through either normal channels or other sources. However, not all loan modifications are TDRs.

TDR Concession Types

The Company’s standards relating to loan modifications consider, among other factors, minimum verified income requirements, cash flow analysis, and collateral valuations. Each potential loan modification is reviewed individually and the terms of the loan are modified to meet a borrower’s specific circumstances at a point in time. All commercial TDRs are reviewed and approved by our SAD. The types of concessions provided to borrowers include:

Interest rate reduction: A reduction of the stated interest rate to a nonmarket rate for the remaining original life of the debt.

Amortization or maturity date change beyond what the collateral supports, including any of the following:

(1) Lengthens the amortization period of the amortized principal beyond market terms. This concession reduces the minimum monthly payment and increases the amount of the balloon payment at the end of the term of the loan. Principal is generally not forgiven.
(2) Reduces the amount of loan principal to be amortized. This concession also reduces the minimum monthly payment and increases the amount of the balloon payment at the end of the term of the loan. Principal is generally not forgiven.
(3) Extends the maturity date or dates of the debt beyond what the collateral supports. This concession generally applies to loans without a balloon payment at the end of the term of the loan.

89


Table of Contents

Chapter 7 bankruptcy: A bankruptcy court’s discharge of a borrower’s debt is considered a concession when the borrower does not reaffirm the discharged debt.

Other: A concession that is not categorized as one of the concessions described above. These concessions include, but are not limited to: principal forgiveness, collateral concessions, covenant concessions, and reduction of accrued interest.

Principal forgiveness may result from any TDR modification of any concession type. However, the aggregate amount of principal forgiven as a result of loans modified as TDRs during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, was not significant.

TDRs by Loan Type

Following is a description of TDRs by the different loan types:

Commercial loan TDRs – Commercial accruing TDRs often result from loans receiving a concession with terms that are not considered a market transaction to Huntington. The TDR remains in accruing status as long as the customer is less than 90-days past due on payments per the restructured loan terms and no loss is expected.

Commercial nonaccrual TDRs result from either: (1) an accruing commercial TDR being placed on nonaccrual status, or (2) a workout where an existing commercial NAL is restructured and a concession was given. At times, these workouts restructure the NAL so that two or more new notes are created. The primary note is underwritten based upon our normal underwriting standards and is sized so projected cash flows are sufficient to repay contractual principal and interest. The terms on the secondary note(s) vary by situation, and may include notes that defer principal and interest payments until after the primary note is repaid. Creating two or more notes often allows the borrower to continue a project or weather a temporary economic downturn and allows Huntington to right-size a loan based upon the current expectations for a borrower’s or project’s performance.

Our strategy involving TDR borrowers includes working with these borrowers to allow them to refinance elsewhere, as well as allow them time to improve their financial position and remain our customer through refinancing their notes according to market terms and conditions in the future. A subsequent refinancing or modification of a loan may occur when either the loan matures according to the terms of the TDR-modified agreement or the borrower requests a change to the loan agreements. At that time, the loan is evaluated to determine if it is creditworthy. It is subjected to the normal underwriting standards and processes for other similar credit extensions, both new and existing. The refinanced note is evaluated to determine if it is considered a new loan or a continuation of the prior loan. A new loan is considered for removal of the TDR designation, whereas a continuation of the prior note requires a continuation of the TDR designation. In order for a TDR designation to be removed, the borrower must no longer be experiencing financial difficulties and the terms of the refinanced loan must not represent a concession.

Residential Mortgage loan TDRs – Residential mortgage TDRs represent loan modifications associated with traditional first-lien mortgage loans in which a concession has been provided to the borrower. The primary concessions given to residential mortgage borrowers are amortization or maturity date changes and interest rate reductions. Residential mortgages identified as TDRs involve borrowers unable to refinance their mortgages through the Company’s normal mortgage origination channels or through other independent sources. Some, but not all, of the loans may be delinquent.

Automobile, Home Equity, and Other Consumer loan TDRs – The Company may make similar interest rate, term, and principal concessions as with residential mortgage loan TDRs.

TDR Impact on Credit Quality

Huntington’s ALLL is largely determined by updated risk ratings assigned to commercial loans, updated borrower credit scores on consumer loans, and borrower delinquency history in both the commercial and consumer portfolios. These updated risk ratings and credit scores consider the default history of the borrower, including payment redefaults. As such, the provision for credit losses is impacted primarily by changes in borrower payment performance rather than the TDR classification. TDRs can be classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loans. Nonaccrual TDRs are included in NALs whereas accruing TDRs are excluded from NALs as it is probable that all contractual principal and interest due under the restructured terms will be collected.

Our TDRs may include multiple concessions and the disclosure classifications are presented based on the primary concession provided to the borrower. The majority of our concessions for the C&I and CRE portfolios are the extension of the maturity date coupled with an increase in the interest rate. In these instances, the primary concession is the maturity date extension.

90


Table of Contents

TDR concessions may also result in the reduction of the ALLL within the C&I and CRE portfolios. This reduction is derived from payments and the resulting application of the reserve calculation within the ALLL. The transaction reserve for non-TDR C&I and CRE loans is calculated based upon several estimated probability factors, such as PD and LGD, both of which were previously discussed. Upon the occurrence of a TDR in our C&I and CRE portfolios, the reserve is measured based on discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs, of the modified loan in accordance with ASC 310-10. The resulting TDR ALLL calculation often results in a lower ALLL amount because (1) the discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs, indicate a lower estimated loss, (2) if the modification includes a rate increase, the discounting of the cash flows on the modified loan, using the pre-modification interest rate, exceeds the carrying value of the loan, or (3) payments may occur as part of the modification. The ALLL for C&I and CRE loans may increase as a result of the modification, as the discounted cash flow analysis may indicate additional reserves are required.

TDR concessions on consumer loans may increase the ALLL. The concessions made to these borrowers often include interest rate reductions, and therefore, the TDR ALLL calculation results in a greater ALLL compared with the non-TDR calculation as the reserve is measured based on the estimation of the discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs, on the modified loan in accordance with ASC 310-10. The resulting TDR ALLL calculation often results in a higher ALLL amount because (1) the discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs, indicate a higher estimated loss or, (2) due to the rate decrease, the discounting of the cash flows on the modified loan, using the pre-modification interest rate, indicates a reduction in the expected cash flows or collateral value, less anticipated selling costs. In certain instances, the ALLL may decrease as a result of payments made in connection with the modification.

Commercial loan TDRs – In instances where the bank substantiates that it will collect its outstanding balance in full, the note is considered for return to accrual status upon the borrower sustaining sufficient cash flows for a six-month period of time. This six-month period could extend before or after the restructure date. If a charge-off was taken as part of the restructuring, any interest or principal payments received on that note are applied to first reduce the bank’s outstanding book balance and then to recoveries of charged-off principal, unpaid interest, and/or fee expenses while the TDR is in nonaccrual status.

Residential Mortgage, Automobile, Home Equity, and Other Consumer loan TDRs – Modified loans identified as TDRs are aggregated into pools for analysis. Cash flows and weighted average interest rates are used to calculate impairment at the pooled-loan level. Once the loans are aggregated into the pool, they continue to be classified as TDRs until contractually repaid or charged-off.

Residential mortgage loans not guaranteed by a U.S. government agency such as the FHA, VA, and the USDA, including TDR loans, are reported as accrual or nonaccrual based upon delinquency status. Nonaccrual TDRs are those that are greater than 150-days contractually past due. Loans guaranteed by U.S. government organizations continue to accrue interest upon delinquency.

The following tables present by class and by the reason for the modification, the number of contracts, post-modification outstanding balance, and the financial effects of the modification for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

91


Table of Contents
New Troubled Debt Restructurings During The Three-Month Period Ended (1)
June 30, 2013 June 30, 2012
(dollar amounts in thousands) Number of
Contracts
Post-modification
Outstanding
Ending

Balance
Financial effects
of modification (2)
Number of
Contracts
Post-modification
Outstanding
Ending

Balance
Financial effects
of modification (2)

C&I - Owner occupied:

Interest rate reduction

5 $ 607 $ (7 ) 4 $ 1,187 $ (2 )

Amortization or maturity date change

22 4,161 13 30 8,312 618

Other

3 751 90 4 1,260 (121 )

Total C&I—Owner occupied

30 $ 5,519 $ 96 38 $ 10,759 $ 495

C&I—Other commercial and industrial:

Interest rate reduction

7 $ 25,187 $ 446 11 $ 3,750 $ 217

Amortization or maturity date change

31 15,573 690 43 19,554 (830 )

Other

7 1,961 3 1,500 (184 )

Total C&I—Other commercial and industrial

45 $ 42,721 $ 1,136 57 $ 24,804 $ (797 )

CRE—Retail properties:

Interest rate reduction

2 $ 738 $ (3 ) 4 $ 3,232 $ 959

Amortization or maturity date change

2 404 (1 ) 5 1,292 (3 )

Other

3 5,894 1,201

Total CRE—Retail properties

7 $ 7,036 $ 1,197 9 $ 4,524 $ 956

CRE—Multi family:

Interest rate reduction

3 $ 487 $ (1 ) $ $

Amortization or maturity date change

6 493 8 3 196 2

Other

1 3,927 26 2 5,586 797

Total CRE—Multi family

10 $ 4,907 $ 33 5 $ 5,782 $ 799

CRE—Office:

Interest rate reduction

4 $ 6,080 $ 1,656 $ $

Amortization or maturity date change

2 479 11 2 1,576 363

Other

2 282

Total CRE—Office

8 $ 6,841 $ 1,667 2 $ 1,576 $ 363

CRE—Industrial and warehouse:

Amortization or maturity date change

2 452 (4 ) 3 1,335 (185 )

Other

Total CRE—Industrial and Warehouse

2 $ 452 $ (4 ) 3 $ 1,335 $ (185 )

92


Table of Contents

CRE—Other commercial real estate:

Interest rate reduction

2 $ 847 $ 53 7 $ 2,037 $ (216 )

Amortization or maturity date change

4 700 2 14 5,877 2

Other

1 352 (1 )

Total CRE—Other commercial real estate

7 $ 1,899 $ 54 21 $ 7,914 $ (214 )

Automobile:

Interest rate reduction

4 $ 31 $ 8 $ 91 $ 2

Amortization or maturity date change

360 1,986 (14 ) 428 2,904 (18 )

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

464 2,649 241

Total Automobile

828 $ 4,666 $ 227 436 $ 2,995 $ (16 )

Residential mortgage:

Interest rate reduction

26 $ 2,056 $ 7 3 $ 6,133 $ (49 )

Amortization or maturity date change

123 15,347 44 143 19,039 688

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

21 1,751 310

Other

6 577 14

Total Residential mortgage

176 $ 19,731 $ 375 146 $ 25,172 $ 639

First-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

43 $ 3,652 $ 279 63 $ 7,389 $ 1,182

Amortization or maturity date change

48 3,550 (193 ) 11 1,263 (1 )

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

16 987 37

Total First-lien home equity

107 $ 8,189 $ 123 74 $ 8,652 $ 1,181

Junior-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

11 $ 599 $ 105 15 $ 544 $ 85

Amortization or maturity date change

313 12,488 (1,175 ) 5 264 (1 )

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

55 568 1,349

Total Junior-lien home equity

379 $ 13,655 $ 279 20 $ 808 $ 84

Other consumer:

Interest rate reduction

2 $ 195 $ 41 1 $ 44 $ 4

Amortization or maturity date change

1 1 6 268 26

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

3 143 40

Total Other consumer

6 $ 339 $ 81 7 $ 312 $ 30

Total new troubled debt restructurings

1,605 $ 115,955 $ 5,264 818 $ 94,633 $ 3,335

93


Table of Contents
New Troubled Debt Restructurings During The Six-Month Period Ended (1)
June 30, 2013 June 30, 2012
(dollar amounts in thousands) Number of
Contracts
Post-modification
Outstanding
Ending

Balance
Financial
effects of
modification (2)
Number of
Contracts
Post-modification
Outstanding
Ending

Balance
Financial effects
of modification (2)

C&I—Owner occupied:

Interest rate reduction

14 $ 5,275 $ (472 ) 14 $ 4,968 $ 132

Amortization or maturity date change

33 9,014 (12 ) 47 11,034 571

Other

8 2,424 89 8 2,771 1,258

Total C&I—Owner occupied

55 $ 16,713 $ (395 ) 69 $ 18,773 $ 1,961

C&I—Other commercial and industrial:

Interest rate reduction

12 $ 42,756 $ 447 17 $ 5,066 $ 262

Amortization or maturity date change

66 37,633 3,395 71 24,010 (838 )

Other

14 7,000 211 18 31,002 65

Total C&I—Other commercial and industrial

92 $ 87,389 $ 4,053 106 $ 60,078 $ (511 )

CRE—Retail properties:

Interest rate reduction

2 $ 738 $ (3 ) 8 $ 6,027 $ 957

Amortization or maturity date change

6 903 (2 ) 10 3,050 (21 )

Other

5 9,723 1,182

Total CRE—Retail properties

13 $ 11,364 $ 1,177 18 $ 9,077 $ 936

CRE—Multi family:

Interest rate reduction

6 $ 2,651 $ 10 2 $ 334 $ (5 )

Amortization or maturity date change

8 1,235 7 13 1,697 (71 )

Other

2 7,883 (7 ) 6 7,618 676

Total CRE—Multi family

16 $ 11,769 $ 10 21 $ 9,649 $ 600

CRE—Office:

Interest rate reduction

4 $ 6,080 $ 1,656 3 $ 2,116 $ 363

Amortization or maturity date change

7 4,343 23 2 1,576 363

Other

2 282 3 306

Total CRE—Office

13 $ 10,705 $ 1,679 8 $ 3,998 $ 726

CRE—Industrial and warehouse:

Interest rate reduction

$ $ 1 $ 3,000 $ 4

Amortization or maturity date change

5 1,093 (3 ) 6 2,773 (121 )

Other

1 5,867

Total CRE—Industrial and Warehouse

6 $ 6,960 $ (3 ) 7 $ 5,773 $ (117 )

CRE—Other commercial real estate:

Interest rate reduction

9 $ 1,490 $ 52 7 $ 2,037 $ (216 )

Amortization or maturity date change

4 700 2 28 52,553 3,762

Other

1 352 (1 ) 2 9,435 (2,004 )

Total CRE—Other commercial real estate

14 $ 2,542 $ 53 37 $ 64,025 $ 1,542

94


Table of Contents

Automobile:

Interest rate reduction

8 $ 73 $ 21 $ 220 $ 4

Amortization or maturity date change

688 3,911 (34 ) 900 6,280 (43 )

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

713 4,288 377

Other

Total Automobile

1,409 $ 8,272 $ 343 921 $ 6,500 $ (39 )

Residential mortgage:

Interest rate reduction

32 $ 8,473 $ (36 ) 4 $ 6,166 $ (49 )

Amortization or maturity date change

177 23,011 69 205 26,092 934

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

65 6,590 443

Other

12 1,285 30

Total Residential mortgage

286 $ 39,359 $ 506 209 $ 32,258 $ 885

First-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

59 $ 5,314 $ 421 130 $ 15,003 $ 2,480

Amortization or maturity date change

77 5,550 (569 ) 26 2,897 (5 )

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

58 3,454 614

Other

Total First-lien home equity

194 $ 14,318 $ 466 156 $ 17,900 $ 2,475

Junior-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

16 $ 749 $ 125 37 $ 1,476 $ 217

Amortization or maturity date change

540 21,371 (2,367 ) 19 872 (17 )

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

180 2,257 3,119

Other

Total Junior-lien home equity

736 $ 24,377 $ 877 56 $ 2,348 $ 200

Other consumer:

Interest rate reduction

3 $ 219 $ 42 5 $ 163 $ 13

Amortization or maturity date change

5 64 2 11 328 29

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

17 280 56

Other

Total Other consumer

25 $ 563 $ 100 16 $ 491 $ 42

Total new troubled debt restructurings

2,859 $ 234,331 $ 8,866 1,624 $ 230,870 $ 8,700

(1) TDRs may include multiple concessions and the disclosure classifications are based on the primary concession provided to the borrower.
(2) Amount represents the financial impact via provision for loan and lease losses as a result of the modification.

Any loan within any portfolio or class is considered as payment redefaulted at 90-days past due.

95


Table of Contents

The following tables present TDRs that have defaulted within one year of modification during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Troubled Debt Restructurings That Have  Redefaulted (1)
Within One Year Of Modification During The
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2013
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2012
(dollar amounts in thousands) Number of
Contracts
Ending
Balance
Number of
Contracts
Ending
Balance

C&I—Owner occupied:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

1 5 472

Other

4 736

Total C&I—Owner occupied

5 $ 736 5 $ 472

C&I—Other commercial and industrial:

Interest rate reduction

$ 3 $ 529

Amortization or maturity date change

3 116 7 494

Other

1 97

Total C&I—Other commercial and industrial

3 $ 116 11 $ 1,120

CRE—Retail Properties:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

1 151

Other

Total CRE—Retail properties

$ 1 $ 151

CRE—Multi family:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

1 119

Other

Total CRE—Multi family

$ 1 $ 119

CRE—Office:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

2 1,131

Other

Total CRE—Office

2 $ 1,131 $

CRE—Industrial and Warehouse:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

Other

Total CRE—Industrial and Warehouse

$ $

CRE—Other commercial real estate:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $ 917

Amortization or maturity date change

1 49 1 118

Other

1 5

Total CRE—Other commercial real estate

2 $ 54 2 $ 1,035

Automobile:

Interest rate reduction

1 $ 19 1 $

Amortization or maturity date change

7 90 43

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

31 146

Other

Total Automobile

39 $ 255 44 $

96


Table of Contents

Residential mortgage:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $ 29

Amortization or maturity date change

15 2,629 38 5,742

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

19 1,304

Other

1 317 4 417

Total Residential mortgage

35 $ 4,250 43 $ 6,188

First-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $ 54

Amortization or maturity date change

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

2 18

Other

Total First-lien home equity

2 $ 18 1 $ 54

Junior-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $ 98

Amortization or maturity date change

1 57 1 65

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

6 160

Other

Total Junior-lien home equity

7 $ 217 2 $ 163

Other consumer:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

3

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

Other

Total Other consumer

$ 3 $

Total troubled debt restructurings with subsequent redefault

95 $ 6,777 113 $ 9,302

97


Table of Contents
Troubled Debt Restructurings That Have  Redefaulted (1)
Within One Year of Modification During The Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013 June 30, 2012
( dollar amounts in thousands) Number of
Contracts
Ending
Balance
Number of
Contracts
Ending
Balance

C&I—Owner occupied:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $ 1,011

Amortization or maturity date change

4 471 6 653

Other

7 1,203

Total C&I—Owner occupied

11 $ 1,674 7 $ 1,664

C&I—Other commercial and industrial:

Interest rate reduction

$ 3 $ 529

Amortization or maturity date change

9 116 9 638

Other

3 459

Total C&I—Other commercial and industrial

9 $ 116 15 $ 1,626

CRE—Retail Properties:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

3 835 2 375

Other

Total CRE—Retail properties

3 $ 835 2 $ 375

CRE—Multi family:

Interest rate reduction

$ 2 $ 1,399

Amortization or maturity date change

1 119

Other

Total CRE—Multi family

$ 3 $ 1,518

CRE—Office:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

2 1,131

Other

Total CRE—Office

2 $ 1,131 $

CRE—Industrial and Warehouse:

Interest rate reduction

$ $

Amortization or maturity date change

Other

Total CRE—Industrial and Warehouse

$ $

CRE—Other commercial real estate:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $ 917

Amortization or maturity date change

1 49 4 670

Other

1 5

Total CRE—Other commercial real estate

2 $ 54 5 $ 1,587

Automobile:

Interest rate reduction

1 $ 19 3 $

Amortization or maturity date change

20 187 103

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

98 461

Other

Total Automobile

119 $ 667 106 $

Residential mortgage:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $ 29

Amortization or maturity date change

37 5,387 58 8,444

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

36 3,168

Other

2 418 4 417

Total Residential mortgage

75 $ 8,973 63 $ 8,890

98


Table of Contents

First-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

$ 9 $ 821

Amortization or maturity date change

1 14

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

6 749

Other

Total First-lien home equity

6 $ 749 10 $ 835

Junior-lien home equity:

Interest rate reduction

$ 2 $ 112

Amortization or maturity date change

1 57 2 80

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

20 569

Other

Total Junior-lien home equity

21 $ 626 4 $ 192

Other consumer:

Interest rate reduction

$ 1 $

Amortization or maturity date change

3

Chapter 7 bankruptcy

1 2

Other

Total Other consumer

1 $ 2 4 $

Total troubled debt restructurings with subsequent redefault

249 $ 14,827 219 $ 16,687

(1) Subsequent redefault is defined as a payment redefault within 12 months of the restructuring date. Payment redefault is defined as 90-days past due for any loan in any portfolio or class. Any loan in any portfolio or class may be considered to be in payment redefault prior to the guidelines noted above when collection of principal or interest is in doubt.

Pledged Loans and Leases

At June 30, 2013, the Bank has access to the Federal Reserve’s discount window and advances from the FHLB – Cincinnati. As of June 30, 2013, these borrowings and advances are secured by $18.9 billion of loans and securities.

99


Table of Contents

4. AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND OTHER SECURITIES

Listed below are the contractual maturities (under 1 year, 1-5 years, 6-10 years, and over 10 years) of available-for-sale and other securities at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Fair Value Amortized
Cost
Fair Value

U.S. Treasury:

Under 1 year

$ $ $ $

1-5 years

50,782 51,254 51,111 51,770

6-10 years

507 521 508 539

Over 10 years

1 3 1 2

Total U.S. Treasury

51,290 51,778 51,620 52,311

Federal agencies: mortgage-backed securities:

Under 1 year

1 1

1-5 years

162,968 164,652 182,722 185,792

6-10 years

486,260 490,116 503,045 521,068

Over 10 years

2,819,868 2,847,309 3,464,196 3,557,809

Total Federal agencies: mortgage-backed securities

3,469,096 3,502,077 4,149,964 4,264,670

Other agencies:

Under 1 year

5,030 5,086 4,934 5,017

1-5 years

305,021 311,716 304,769 314,149

6-10 years

27,899 28,312 39,143 40,460

Over 10 years

Total other agencies

337,950 345,114 348,846 359,626

Total U.S. Government backed agencies

3,858,336 3,898,969 4,550,430 4,676,607

Municipal securities:

Under 1 year

6,197 6,239 466 466

1-5 years

179,502 183,855 173,300 177,593

6-10 years

337,621 330,280 257,314 265,490

Over 10 years

51,612 51,289 58,000 57,451

Total municipal securities

574,932 571,663 489,080 501,000

Private-label CMO:

Under 1 year

1-5 years

6-10 years

2,713 2,767 7,394 7,567

Over 10 years

54,032 50,067 68,163 64,001

Total private-label CMO

56,745 52,834 75,557 71,568

Asset-backed securities:

Under 1 year

26,000 26,087 26,000 26,258

1-5 years

540,312 545,047 506,319 514,616

6-10 years

239,975 239,319 204,525 210,477

Over 10 years

469,582 370,477 389,471 277,732

Total asset-backed securities

1,275,869 1,180,930 1,126,315 1,029,083

Covered bonds:

Under 1 year

1-5 years

281,341 286,911 282,080 290,625

6-10 years

Over 10 years

Total covered bonds

281,341 286,911 282,080 290,625

Corporate debt:

Under 1 year

26,585 26,650 27,153 27,411

1-5 years

258,262 265,391 458,516 468,077

6-10 years

190,462 183,078 158,878 162,453

Over 10 years

10,130 10,444 10,146 10,201

Total corporate debt

485,439 485,563 654,693 668,142

Other:

Under 1 year

1,500 1,498

1-5 years

3,900 3,770 2,400 2,400

6-10 years

Over 10 years

Non-marketable equity securities

316,172 316,172 308,075 308,075

Marketable equity securities

18,396 18,846 16,877 17,177

Total other

338,468 338,788 328,852 329,150

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$ 6,871,130 $ 6,815,658 $ 7,507,007 $ 7,566,175

100


Table of Contents

Other securities at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 include $165.6 million of stock issued by the FHLB of Cincinnati, $3.5 million of stock issued by the FHLB of Indianapolis, and $147.1 million and $139.0 million, respectively, of Federal Reserve Bank stock. Other securities also include corporate debt and marketable equity securities. Non-marketable equity securities are valued at amortized cost. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Huntington did not have any material equity positions in FNMA or FHLMC.

The following tables provide amortized cost, fair value, and gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income by investment category at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Unrealized

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Gross
Gains
Gross
Losses
Fair Value

June 30, 2013

U.S. Treasury

$ 51,290 $ 488 $ $ 51,778

Federal agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

3,469,096 50,969 (17,988 ) 3,502,077

Other agencies

337,950 7,325 (161 ) 345,114

Total U.S. Government backed securities

3,858,336 58,782 (18,149 ) 3,898,969

Municipal securities

574,932 7,534 (10,803 ) 571,663

Private-label CMO

56,745 781 (4,692 ) 52,834

Asset-backed securities

1,275,869 7,875 (102,814 ) 1,180,930

Covered bonds

281,341 5,570 286,911

Corporate debt

485,439 9,641 (9,517 ) 485,563

Other securities

338,468 523 (203 ) 338,788

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$ 6,871,130 $ 90,706 $ (146,178 ) $ 6,815,658

Unrealized

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Gross
Gains
Gross
Losses
Fair Value

December 31, 2012

U.S. Treasury

$ 51,620 $ 691 $ $ 52,311

Federal agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

4,149,964 114,984 (278 ) 4,264,670

Other agencies

348,846 10,781 (1 ) 359,626

Total U.S. Government backed securities

4,550,430 126,456 (279 ) 4,676,607

Municipal securities

489,080 13,927 (2,007 ) 501,000

Private-label CMO

75,557 1,087 (5,076 ) 71,568

Asset-backed securities

1,126,315 16,287 (113,519 ) 1,029,083

Covered bonds

282,080 8,545 290,625

Corporate debt

654,693 15,301 (1,852 ) 668,142

Other securities

328,852 333 (35 ) 329,150

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$ 7,507,007 $ 181,936 $ (122,768 ) $ 7,566,175

101


Table of Contents

The following tables provide detail on investment securities with unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Less than 12 Months Over 12 Months Total

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses

June 30, 2013

U.S. Treasury

$ $ $ $ $ $

Federal agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

1,067,989 (17,988 ) 1,067,989 (17,988 )

Other agencies

7,587 (161 ) 7,587 (161 )

Total U.S. Government backed securities

1,075,576 (18,149 ) 1,075,576 (18,149 )

Municipal securities

244,896 (10,803 ) 244,896 (10,803 )

Private-label CMO

26,089 (123 ) 21,748 (4,569 ) 47,837 (4,692 )

Asset-backed securities

347,595 (10,065 ) 119,861 (92,749 ) 467,456 (102,814 )

Covered bonds

Corporate debt

237,719 (9,517 ) 237,719 (9,517 )

Other securities

3,020 (131 ) 2,749 (72 ) 5,769 (203 )

Total temporarily impaired securities

$ 1,934,895 $ (48,788 ) $ 144,358 $ (97,390 ) $ 2,079,253 $ (146,178 )

Less than 12 Months Over 12 Months Total

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses

December 31, 2012

U.S. Treasury

$ $ $ $ $ $

Federal agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

44,836 (278 ) 44,836 (278 )

Other agencies

801 (1 ) 801 (1 )

Total U.S. Government backed securities

45,637 (279 ) 45,637 (279 )

Municipal securities

51,316 (2,007 ) 51,316 (2,007 )

Private-label CMO

22,793 34,617 (5,076 ) 57,410 (5,076 )

Asset-backed securities

28,089 (73 ) 108,660 (113,446 ) 136,749 (113,519 )

Covered bonds

Corporate debt

138,792 (1,472 ) 119,620 (380 ) 258,412 (1,852 )

Other securities

1,630 (35 ) 1,630 (35 )

Total temporarily impaired securities

$ 286,627 $ (3,831 ) $ 264,527 $ (118,937 ) $ 551,154 $ (122,768 )

The following table is a summary of realized securities gains and losses for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Gross gains on sales of securities

$ 988 $ 704 $ 1,187 $ 1,483

Gross (losses) on sales of securities

(378 ) (101 ) (390 ) (256 )

Net gain on sales of securities

$ 610 $ 603 $ 797 $ 1,227

Pooled-Trust-Preferred, and Private-Label CMO Securities

The highest risk category of our investment portfolio are the private-label CMO and the pooled-trust-preferred portfolios. Of the $52.8 million of the private-label CMO securities reported at fair value at June 30, 2013, approximately $19.6 million are rated below investment grade. The pooled-trust-preferred securities are in the asset-backed securities portfolio. The performance of the underlying securities in each of these categories continued to reflect the economic environment. Each of these securities in these two categories is subjected to a rigorous review of its projected cash flows. These reviews are supported with analysis from independent third parties.

102


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the relevant characteristics of our pooled-trust-preferred securities portfolio, which are included in asset-backed securities, at June 30, 2013. Each security is part of a pool of issuers and supports a more senior tranche of securities except for the I-Pre TSL II, and MM Comm III securities which are the most senior class.

Trust Preferred Securities Data

June 30, 2013

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized Fair Unrealized Lowest
Credit
# of Issuers
Currently
Performing/
Actual
Deferrals
and
Defaults
as a % of
Original
Expected
Defaults as
a % of
Remaining
Performing
Excess

Deal Name

Par Value Cost Value Loss (2) Rating (3) Remaining (4) Collateral Collateral Subordination (5)

Alesco II (1)

$ 41,647 $ 30,035 $ 11,686 $ (18,349 ) C 30/35 11 % 11 % %

Alesco IV (1)

21,735 8,246 4,621 (3,625 ) C 31/37 9 13

ICONS

20,000 20,000 14,520 (5,480 ) BB 22/23 3 13 50

I-Pre TSL II

25,783 25,718 22,210 (3,508 ) A 22/24 5 10 74

MM Comm III

7,162 6,843 5,086 (1,757 ) B 6/10 5 8 26

Pre TSL IX (1)

5,000 3,955 1,734 (2,221 ) C 30/44 20 13 4

Pre TSL X (1)

17,313 8,801 5,421 (3,380 ) C 34/48 25 12

Pre TSL XI (1)

25,000 21,336 8,367 (12,969 ) C 41/60 26 14 1

Pre TSL XIII (1)

28,546 22,041 10,867 (11,174 ) C 43/61 27 21 5

Reg Diversified (1)

25,500 6,908 518 (6,390 ) D 23/42 40 13

Soloso (1)

12,500 2,526 118 (2,408 ) C 37/64 32 22

Tropic III

31,000 31,000 11,442 (19,558 ) CC 24/41 30 17 34

Total at June 30, 2013

$ 261,186 $ 187,409 $ 96,590 $ (90,819 )

Total at December 31, 2012

$ 266,863 $ 195,760 $ 84,296 $ (111,464 )

(1) Security was determined to have OTTI. As such, the book value is net of recorded credit impairment.
(2) The majority of securities have been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or longer.
(3) For purposes of comparability, the lowest credit rating expressed is equivalent to Fitch ratings even where the lowest rating is based on another nationally recognized credit rating agency.
(4) Includes both banks and/or insurance companies.
(5) Excess subordination percentage represents the additional defaults in excess of both current and projected defaults that the CDO can absorb before the bond experiences credit impairment. Excess subordinated percentage is calculated by (a) determining what percentage of defaults a deal can experience before the bond has credit impairment, and (b) subtracting from this default breakage percentage both total current and expected future default percentages.

Security Impairment

Huntington evaluates its available-for-sale securities portfolio on a quarterly basis for indicators of OTTI. Huntington assesses whether OTTI has occurred when the fair value of a debt security is less than the amortized cost basis at period-end. Management reviews the amount of unrealized loss, the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position, the credit rating history, market trends of similar security classes, time remaining to maturity, and the source of both interest and principal payments to identify securities which could potentially be impaired. OTTI is considered to have occurred; (1) if Huntington intends to sell the security; (2) if it is more likely than not Huntington will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) the present value of the expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover all contractually required principal and interest payments.

For securities that Huntington does not expect to sell and it is not more likely than not to be required to sell, the OTTI is separated into credit and noncredit components. A discounted cash flow analysis, which includes evaluating the timing of the expected cash flows, is completed for all debt securities subject to credit impairment. The measurement of the credit loss component is equal to the difference between the debt security’s cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s original effective yield. The credit-related OTTI, represented by the expected loss in principal, is recognized in noninterest income. The remaining difference between the security’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is due to factors that are not credit-related and, therefore, are recognized in OCI. Huntington believes that it will fully collect the carrying value of securities on which noncredit-related OTTI has been recognized in OCI. Noncredit-related OTTI results from other factors, including increased liquidity spreads and extension of the security. For securities which Huntington does expect to sell, or if it is more likely than not Huntington will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, all OTTI is recognized in earnings. Presentation of OTTI is made in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income on a gross basis with a reduction for the amount of OTTI recognized in OCI. Once an OTTI is recorded, when future cash flows can be reasonably estimated, future cash flows are re-allocated between interest and principal cash flows to provide for a level-yield on the security.

103


Table of Contents

Huntington applied the related OTTI guidance on the debt security types listed below.

Alt-A mortgage-backed and private-label CMO securities are collateralized by first-lien residential mortgage loans. The securities are valued by a third party pricing specialist using a discounted cash flow approach and proprietary pricing model. The model uses inputs such as estimated prepayment speeds, losses, recoveries, default rates that are implied by the underlying performance of collateral in the structure or similar structures, discount rates that are implied by market prices for similar securities, collateral structure types, and house price depreciation / appreciation rates that are based upon macroeconomic forecasts.

Pooled-trust-preferred securities are CDOs backed by a pool of debt securities issued by financial institutions. The collateral generally consists of trust-preferred securities and subordinated debt securities issued by banks, bank holding companies, and insurance companies. A full cash flow analysis is used to estimate fair values and assess impairment for each security within this portfolio. A third party pricing specialist with direct industry experience in pooled-trust-preferred security evaluations is engaged to provide assistance estimating the fair value and expected cash flows on this portfolio. The full cash flow analysis is completed by evaluating the relevant credit and structural aspects of each pooled-trust-preferred security in the portfolio, including collateral performance projections for each piece of collateral in the security and terms of the security’s structure. The credit review includes an analysis of profitability, credit quality, operating efficiency, leverage, and liquidity using available financial and regulatory information for each underlying collateral issuer. The analysis also includes a review of historical industry default data, current/near term operating conditions, and the impact of macroeconomic and regulatory changes. Using the results of our analysis, we estimate appropriate default and recovery probabilities for each piece of collateral then estimate the expected cash flows for each security. The cumulative probability of default ranges from a low of 1% to 100%.

Many collateral issuers have the option of deferring interest payments on their debt for up to five years. For issuers who are deferring interest, assumptions are made regarding the issuers ability to resume interest payments and make the required principal payment at maturity; the cumulative probability of default for these issuers currently ranges from 1% to 100%, and a 10% recovery assumption. The fair value of each security is obtained by discounting the expected cash flows at a market discount rate, ranging from LIBOR plus 4.0% to LIBOR plus 15.8% as of June 30, 2013. The market discount rate is determined by reference to yields observed in the market for similarly rated collateralized debt obligations, specifically high-yield collateralized loan obligations. The relatively high market discount rate is reflective of the uncertainty of the cash flows and illiquid nature of these securities. The large differential between the fair value and amortized cost of some of the securities reflects the high market discount rate and the expectation that the majority of the cash flows will not be received until near the final maturity of the security (the final maturities range from 2032 to 2035).

For the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the following table summarizes by security type the total OTTI losses recognized in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for securities evaluated for impairment as described above.

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Available-for-sale and other securities:

Alt-A Mortgage-backed

$ $ $ $

Pooled-trust-preferred

(1,020 ) (1,380 )

Private label CMO

(248 ) (336 ) (1,485 )

Total debt securities

(1,020 ) (248 ) (1,716 ) (1,485 )

Equity securities

(5 ) (5 )

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$ (1,020 ) $ (253 ) $ (1,716 ) $ (1,490 )

104


Table of Contents

The following table rolls forward the OTTI amounts recognized in earnings on debt securities held by Huntington for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 as follows:

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Balance, beginning of period

$ 50,129 $ 56,904 $ 49,433 $ 56,764

Reductions from sales/maturities

(1,298 ) (1,298 ) (1,097 )

Credit losses not previously recognized

Additional credit losses

1,020 248 1,716 1,485

Balance, end of period

$ 49,851 $ 57,152 $ 49,851 $ 57,152

The fair values of these assets have been impacted by various market conditions. The unrealized losses were primarily the result of wider liquidity spreads on asset-backed securities and increased market volatility on non-agency mortgage and asset-backed securities that are collateralized by certain mortgage loans. In addition, the expected average lives of the asset-backed securities backed by trust-preferred securities have been extended, due to changes in the expectations of when the underlying securities would be repaid. The contractual terms and / or cash flows of the investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost. Huntington does not intend to sell, nor does it believe it will be required to sell these securities until the fair value is recovered, which may be maturity and; therefore, does not consider them to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2013.

As of June 30, 2013, Management has evaluated all other investment securities with unrealized losses and all non-marketable securities for impairment and concluded no additional OTTI is required.

5. HELD-TO-MATURITY SECURITIES

These are debt securities that Huntington has the intent and ability to hold until maturity. The debt securities are carried at amortized cost and adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using the interest method.

Listed below are the contractual maturities (under 1 year, 1-5 years, 6-10 years, and over 10 years) of held-to-maturity securities at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value

Federal agencies: mortgage-backed securities:

Under 1 year

$ $ $ $

1-5 years

6-10 years

24,901 22,995 24,901 24,739

Over 10 years

2,055,440 2,054,902 1,624,483 1,672,702

Total Federal agencies: mortgage-backed securities

2,080,341 2,077,897 1,649,384 1,697,441

Other agencies:

Under 1 year

1-5 years

6-10 years

14,348 14,166 15,108 15,338

Over 10 years

67,898 65,457 69,399 71,341

Total other agencies

82,246 79,623 84,507 86,679

Total U.S. Government backed agencies

2,162,587 2,157,520 1,733,891 1,784,120

Municipal securities:

Under 1 year

1-5 years

6-10 years

Over 10 years

9,642 9,229 9,985 9,985

Total municipal securities

9,642 9,229 9,985 9,985

Total held-to-maturity securities

$ 2,172,229 $ 2,166,749 $ 1,743,876 $ 1,794,105

105


Table of Contents

The following table provides amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value by investment category at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Unrealized

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Gross
Gains
Gross
Losses
Fair
Value

June 30, 2013

Federal Agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

$ 2,080,341 $ 16,107 $ (18,551 ) $ 2,077,897

Other agencies

82,246 (2,623 ) 79,623

Total U.S. Government backed securities

2,162,587 16,107 (21,174 ) 2,157,520

Municipal securities

9,642 (413 ) 9,229

Total held-to-maturity securities

$ 2,172,229 $ 16,107 $ (21,587 ) $ 2,166,749

Unrealized

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortized
Cost
Gross
Gains
Gross
Losses
Fair
Value

December 31, 2012

Federal Agencies:

Mortgage-backed securities

$ 1,649,384 $ 48,219 $ (162 ) $ 1,697,441

Other agencies

84,507 2,172 86,679

Total U.S. Government backed securities

1,733,891 50,391 (162 ) 1,784,120

Municipal securities

9,985 9,985

Total held-to-maturity securities

$ 1,743,876 $ 50,391 $ (162 ) $ 1,794,105

Security Impairment

Huntington evaluates the held-to-maturity securities portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment. Impairment would exist when the present value of the expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. Under these circumstances, any impairment would be recognized in earnings. As of June 30, 2013, Management has evaluated held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses for impairment and concluded no OTTI is required.

6. LOAN SALES AND SECURITIZATIONS

Residential Mortgage Loans

The following table summarizes activity relating to residential mortgage loans sold with servicing retained for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Residential mortgage loans sold with servicing retained

$ 913,994 $ 850,215 $ 1,750,127 $ 1,856,300

Pretax gains resulting from above loan sales (1)

32,727 24,713 68,295 53,654

(1) Recorded in mortgage banking income.

A MSR is established only when the servicing is contractually separated from the underlying mortgage loans by sale or securitization of the loans with servicing rights retained. At initial recognition, the MSR asset is established at its fair value using assumptions consistent with assumptions used to estimate the fair value of existing MSRs. At the time of initial capitalization, MSRs may be recorded using either the fair value method or the amortization method. The election of the fair value method or amortization method is made at the time each servicing class is established. Subsequently, servicing rights are accounted for based on the methodology chosen for each respective servicing class. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of MSRs carried under the fair value method, as well as amortization or impairment of MSRs recorded using the amortization method, during the period is recorded as an increase or decrease in mortgage banking income, which is reflected in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

106


Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the changes in MSRs recorded using either the fair value method or the amortization method for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Fair Value Method:

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Fair value, beginning of period

$ 35,582 $ 62,454 $ 35,202 $ 65,001

Change in fair value during the period due to:

Time decay (1)

(625 ) (793 ) (1,234 ) (1,649 )

Payoffs (2)

(3,601 ) (4,253 ) (6,759 ) (8,292 )

Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions (3)

6,188 (12,347 ) 10,335 (9,999 )

Fair value, end of period:

$ 37,544 $ 45,061 $ 37,544 $ 45,061

Weighted-average life (years)

4.2 3.2 4.2 3.2

(1) Represents decrease in value due to passage of time, including the impact from both regularly scheduled loan principal payments and partial loan paydowns.
(2) Represents decrease in value associated with loans that paid off during the period.
(3) Represents change in value resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment spreads.

Amortization Method:

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Carrying value, beginning of period

$ 104,345 $ 85,895 $ 85,545 $ 72,434

New servicing assets created

9,465 8,069 18,750 18,356

Impairment (charge) / recovery

7,940 (6,665 ) 21,591 893

Amortization and other

(3,772 ) (4,063 ) (7,908 ) (8,447 )

Carrying value, end of period

$ 117,978 $ 83,236 $ 117,978 $ 83,236

Fair value, end of period

$ 129,050 $ 83,320 $ 129,050 $ 83,320

Weighted-average life (years)

6.4 3.6 6.4 3.6

MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of MSRs occur, the precise terms and conditions are typically not readily available. Therefore, the fair value of MSRs is estimated using a discounted future cash flow model. The model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees and assumptions related to prepayments, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenues, costs to service, and other economic factors. Changes in the assumptions used may have a significant impact on the valuation of MSRs.

MSR values are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans, which can be greatly impacted by the level of prepayments. Huntington hedges the value of certain MSRs against changes in value attributable to changes in interest rates using a combination of derivative instruments and trading securities.

For MSRs under the fair value method, a summary of key assumptions and the sensitivity of the MSR value at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, to changes in these assumptions follows:

June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012
Decline in fair value due to Decline in fair value due to

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Actual 10%
adverse
change
20%
adverse
change
Actual 10%
adverse
change
20%
adverse
change

Constant prepayment rate (annualized)

11.80 % $ (2,280 ) $ (4,436 ) 19.52 % $ (2,608 ) $ (5,051 )

Spread over forward interest rate swap rates

1,233 bps (1,560 ) (3,120 ) 1,288 bps (1,290 ) (2,580 )

107


Table of Contents

For MSRs under the amortization method, a summary of key assumptions and the sensitivity of the MSR value at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, to changes in these assumptions follows:

June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012
Decline in fair value due to Decline in fair value due to

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Actual 10%
adverse
change
20%
adverse
change
Actual 10%
adverse
change
20%
adverse
change

Constant prepayment rate (annualized)

7.40 % $ (6,892 ) $ (13,474 ) 15.45 % $ (4,936 ) $ (9,451 )

Spread over forward interest rate swap rates

915 bps (5,175 ) (10,350 ) 940 bps (3,060 ) (6,119 )

Total servicing fees included in mortgage banking income amounted to $10.9 million and $11.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, servicing fees totaled $22.1 million and $23.4 million, respectively. The unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for third parties was $15.2 billion and $15.6 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Automobile Loans and Leases

Huntington has retained servicing responsibilities on sold automobile loans and receives annual servicing fees and other ancillary fees on the outstanding loan balances. Automobile loan servicing rights are accounted for using the amortization method. A servicing asset is established at fair value at the time of the sale. The servicing asset is then amortized against servicing income. Impairment, if any, is recognized when carrying value exceeds the fair value as determined by calculating the present value of expected net future cash flows. The primary risk characteristic for measuring servicing assets is payoff rates of the underlying loan pools. Valuation calculations rely on the predicted payoff assumption and, if actual payoff is quicker than expected, then future value would be impaired.

Changes in the carrying value of automobile loan servicing rights for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and the fair value at the end of each period were as follows:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Carrying value, beginning of period

$ 30,436 $ 30,780 $ 35,606 $ 13,377

New servicing assets created

19,883

Amortization and other

(4,748 ) (4,043 ) (9,918 ) (6,523 )

Carrying value, end of period

$ 25,688 $ 26,737 $ 25,688 $ 26,737

Fair value, end of period

$ 25,742 $ 27,596 $ 25,742 $ 27,596

Weighted-average life (years)

3.8 4.5 3.8 4.5

A summary of key assumptions and the sensitivity of the automobile loan servicing rights value to changes in these assumptions at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 follows:

June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012
Decline in fair value due to Decline in fair value due to

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Actual 10%
adverse
change
20%
adverse
change
Actual 10%
adverse
change
20%
adverse
change

Constant prepayment rate (annualized)

15.10 % $ (795 ) $ (1,602 ) 13.80 % $ (880 ) $ (1,771 )

Spread over forward interest rate swap rates

500 bps (13 ) (27 ) 500 bps (18 ) (36 )

Servicing income, net of amortization of capitalized servicing assets and impairment, amounted to $2.6 million and $2.1 million for the three-month periods ending June 30, 2013, and 2012, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, servicing income, net of amortization of capitalized servicing assets, amounted to $5.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The unpaid principal balance of automobile loans serviced for third parties was $2.0 billion and $2.5 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

108


Table of Contents

7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Business segments are based on segment leadership structure, which reflects how segment performance is monitored and assessed. A rollforward of goodwill by business segment for the first six-month period of 2013 is presented in the table below:

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Retail &
Business
Banking
Regional &
Commercial
Banking
AFCRE WGH Treasury/
Other
Huntington
Consolidated

Balance, beginning of period

$ 286,824 $ 16,169 $ $ 98,951 $ 42,324 $ 444,268

Adjustments

Balance, end of period

$ 286,824 $ 16,169 $ $ 98,951 $ 42,324 $ 444,268

Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis at October 1 of each year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. No events or changes in circumstances since the October 1, 2012, annual impairment test were noted that would indicate it was more likely than not a goodwill impairment existed.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Huntington’s other intangible assets consisted of the following:

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Value

June 30, 2013

Core deposit intangible

$ 380,249 $ (318,794 ) $ 61,455

Customer relationship

106,974 (54,782 ) 52,192

Other

25,164 (24,937 ) 227

Total other intangible assets

$ 512,387 $ (398,513 ) $ 113,874

December 31, 2012

Core deposit intangible

$ 380,249 $ (302,003 ) $ 78,246

Customer relationship

104,574 (50,925 ) 53,649

Other

25,164 (24,902 ) 262

Total other intangible assets

$ 509,987 $ (377,830 ) $ 132,157

The estimated amortization expense of other intangible assets for the remainder of 2013 and the next five years is as follows:

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amortization
Expense

2013

$ 20,773

2014

36,711

2015

20,549

2016

7,336

2017

6,854

2018

5,983

109


Table of Contents

8. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The components of other comprehensive income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were as follows:

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2013
Tax (Expense)

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pretax Benefit After-tax

Noncredit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold

$ 6,102 $ (2,157 ) $ 3,945

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities arising during the period

(119,321 ) 42,105 (77,216 )

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income

926 (327 ) 599

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities

(112,293 ) 39,621 (72,672 )

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale equity securities

(68 ) 21 (47 )

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships arising during the period

(82,327 ) 28,815 (53,512 )

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income

(4,459 ) 1,561 (2,898 )

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships

(86,786 ) 30,376 (56,410 )

Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost included in net income

8,227 (2,879 ) 5,348

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

$ (190,920 ) $ 67,139 $ (123,781 )

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2012
Tax (Expense)

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pretax Benefit After-tax

Noncredit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold

$ (713 ) 250 (463 )

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities arising during the period

4,575 (1,661 ) 2,914

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income

(350 ) 123 (227 )

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities

3,512 (1,288 ) 2,224

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale equity securities

44 (15 ) 29

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships arising during the period

23,211 (8,117 ) 15,094

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income

1,932 (683 ) 1,249

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships

25,143 (8,800 ) 16,343

Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost included in net income

4,990 (1,747 ) 3,243

Total other comprehensive income

$ 33,689 $ (11,850 ) $ 21,839

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
Tax (expense)

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pretax Benefit After-tax

Noncredit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold

$ 11,996 $ (4,242 ) $ 7,754

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities arising during the period

(128,019 ) 45,138 (82,881 )

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income

1,231 (435 ) 796

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities

(114,792 ) 40,461 (74,331 )

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale equity securities

152 (56 ) 96

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships arising during the period

(98,254 ) 34,389 (63,865 )

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income

(8,485 ) 2,970 (5,515 )

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships

(106,739 ) 37,359 (69,380 )

Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost included in net income

16,455 (5,759 ) 10,696

Total other comprehensive income

$ (204,924 ) $ 72,005 $ (132,919 )

110


Table of Contents
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2012
Tax (expense)

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Pretax Benefit After-tax

Noncredit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold

6,252 (2,188 ) 4,064

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities arising during the period

31,362 (11,223 ) 20,139

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income

263 (92 ) 171

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities

37,877 (13,503 ) 24,374

Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale equity securities

387 (135 ) 252

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships arising during the period

(16,457 ) 5,759 (10,698 )

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income

26,725 (9,353 ) 17,372

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships

10,268 (3,594 ) 6,674

Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost included in net income

9,979 (3,493 ) 6,486

Total other comprehensive income

$ 58,511 $ (20,725 ) $ 37,786

The following table presents activity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013:

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Unrealized
gains and
(losses) on debt
securities (1)
Unrealized
gains and
(losses) on
equity
securities
Unrealized
gains and
(losses) on
cash flow
hedging
derivatives
Unrealized
gains (losses)
for pension
and other post-
retirement
obligations
Total

Balance, December 31, 2012

$ 38,304 $ 194 $ 47,084 $ (236,399 ) $ (150,817 )

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

(75,127 ) 96 (63,865 ) (138,896 )

Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI

796 (5,515 ) 10,696 5,977

Period change

(74,331 ) 96 (69,380 ) 10,696 (132,919 )

Balance, June 30, 2013

$ (36,027 ) $ 290 $ (22,296 ) $ (225,703 ) $ (283,736 )

(1) Amount at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 includes $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of net unrealized gains on securities transferred from the available-for-sale securities portfolio to the held-to-maturity securities portfolio. The net unrealized gains will be recognized in earnings over the remaining life of the security using the effective interest method.

111


Table of Contents

The following table presents the reclassification adjustments out of accumulated OCI included in net income and the impacted line items as listed on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013:

Reclassifications out of accumulated OCI

Accumulated OCI components

Amounts
reclassified from
accumulated OCI

Location of net gain (loss)

reclassified from accumulated

OCI into earnings

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Three
Months Ended
June 30, 2013
Six
Months Ended
June 30, 2013

Gains (losses) on debt securities:

Amortization of unrealized gains (losses)

$ 60 $ 115 Interest income - held-to-maturity securities - taxable

Realized gain (loss) on sale of securities

34 370 Noninterest income - net gains (losses) on sale of securities

OTTI recorded

(1,020 ) (1,716 ) Noninterest income - net gains (losses) on sale of securities

(926 ) (1,231 ) Total before tax
327 435 Tax (expense) benefit

$ (599 ) $ (796 ) Net of tax

Gains (losses) on cash flow hedging relationships:

Interest rate contracts

$ 4,374 $ 8,290 Interest income - loans and leases

Interest rate contracts

85 195 Noninterest income - other income

4,459 8,485 Total before tax
(1,561 ) (2,970 ) Tax (expense) benefit

$ 2,898 $ 5,515 Net of tax

Amortization of defined benefit pension and post-retirement items:

Actuarial gains (losses)

$ (9,954 ) $ (19,909 ) Noninterest expense - personnel costs

Prior service costs

1,727 3,454 Noninterest expense - personnel costs

(8,227 ) (16,455 ) Total before tax
2,879 5,759 Tax (expense) benefit

$ (5,348 ) $ (10,696 ) Net of tax

9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Share Repurchase Program

On March 14, 2013, Huntington announced that the Federal Reserve did not object to Huntington’s proposed capital actions included in Huntington’s capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve in January of this year. These actions included an increase in the quarterly dividend per common share to $0.05, starting in the second quarter of 2013 and potential repurchase of up to $227 million of common stock through the first quarter of 2014. Huntington’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase program consistent with Huntington’s capital plan. This program replaced the previously authorized share repurchase program authorized by Huntington’s board of directors in 2012.

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, Huntington repurchased a total of 10.0 million shares of common stock, at a weighted average share price of $7.50. Under both share repurchase programs, Huntington repurchased a total of 14.7 million shares of common stock during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, at a weighted average share price of $7.36.

10. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is the amount of earnings (adjusted for dividends declared on preferred stock) available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share is the amount of earnings available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period adjusted to include the effect of potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares include incremental shares issued for stock options, restricted stock units and awards, distributions from deferred compensation plans, and the conversion of Huntington’s convertible preferred stock. Potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in periods in which the effect would be antidilutive. For diluted earnings per share, net income available to common shares can be affected by the conversion of Huntington’s convertible preferred stock. Where the effect of this conversion would be dilutive, net income available to common shareholders is adjusted by the associated preferred dividends and deemed dividend. The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, was as follows:

112


Table of Contents
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) 2013 2012 2013 2012

Basic earnings per common share:

Net income

$ 150,651 $ 152,706 $ 302,431 $ 305,976

Preferred stock dividends

(7,967 ) (7,984 ) (15,937 ) (16,033 )

Net income available to common shareholders

$ 142,684 $ 144,722 $ 286,494 $ 289,943

Average common shares issued and outstanding

834,730 862,261 837,917 863,380

Basic earnings per common share

$ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.34 $ 0.34

Diluted earnings per common share

Net income available to common shareholders

$ 142,684 $ 144,722 $ 286,494 $ 289,943

Effect of assumed preferred stock conversion

Net income applicable to diluted earnings per share

$ 142,684 $ 144,722 $ 286,494 $ 289,943

Average common shares issued and outstanding

834,730 862,261 837,917 863,380

Dilutive potential common shares:

Stock options and restricted stock units and awards

7,758 4,075 7,019 3,769

Shares held in deferred compensation plans

1,352 1,215 1,338 1,208

Conversion of preferred stock

Dilutive potential common shares:

9,110 5,290 8,357 4,977

Total diluted average common shares issued and outstanding

843,840 867,551 846,274 868,357

Diluted earnings per common share

$ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.34 $ 0.33

For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, approximately 11.2 million and 17.7 million, respectively, of options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would be antidilutive. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, amounts not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share were 11.1 million and 17.7 million shares, respectively.

11. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Huntington sponsors nonqualified and incentive share based compensation plans. These plans provide for the granting of stock options and other awards to officers, directors, and other employees. Compensation costs are included in personnel costs on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Stock options are granted at the closing market price on the date of the grant. Options granted typically vest ratably over three years or when other conditions are met. Stock options, which represented a significant portion of our grant values, have no intrinsic value until the stock price increases. Options granted prior to May 2004 have a term of ten years. All options granted after May 2004 have a term of seven years.

In 2012, shareholders approved the Huntington Bancshares Incorporated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) which authorized 51.0 million shares for future grants. The Plan is the only active plan under which Huntington is currently granting share based options and awards. At June 30, 2013, 24.2 million shares from the Plan were available for future grants. Huntington issues shares to fulfill stock option exercises and restricted stock unit and award vesting from available authorized common shares. At June 30, 2013, the Company believes there are adequate authorized common shares to satisfy anticipated stock option exercises and restricted stock unit and award vesting in 2013.

Huntington uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value share-based compensation expense. Forfeitures are estimated at the date of grant based on historical rates and reduce the compensation expense recognized. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the date of grant. Expected volatility is based on the estimated volatility of Huntington’s stock over the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the dividend rate and stock price at the date of the grant.

113


Table of Contents

The following table illustrates the weighted-average assumptions used in the option-pricing model for options granted for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2013 2012 2013 2012

Assumptions

Risk-free interest rate

0.78 % 1.10 % 0.78 % 1.10 %

Expected dividend yield

2.83 2.36 2.83 2.37

Expected volatility of Huntington’s common stock

35.0 35.0 35.0 34.9

Expected option term (years)

5.5 6.0 5.5 6.0

Weighted-average grant date fair value per share

$ 1.71 $ 1.80 $ 1.71 $ 1.79

The following table illustrates total share-based compensation expense and related tax benefit for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Share-based compensation expense

$ 9,875 $ 7,517 $ 17,896 $ 12,820

Tax benefit

3,349 2,501 6,033 4,261

Huntington’s stock option activity and related information for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, was as follows:

(amounts in thousands, except years and per share amounts)

Options Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life  (Years)
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Outstanding at January 1, 2013

26,768 $ 8.87

Granted

3,273 7.06

Exercised

(1,238 ) 5.72

Forfeited/expired

(1,740 ) 9.92

Outstanding at June 30, 2013

27,063 $ 8.73 4.3 $ 36,984

Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2013 (1)

12,249 $ 6.39 5.6 $ 18,112

Exercisable at June 30, 2013

13,491 $ 11.05 3.0 $ 17,271

(1) The number of options expected to vest includes an estimate of expected forfeitures.

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair value of underlying stock exceeds the “in-the-money” option exercise price. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, cash received for the exercises of stock options was $7.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively. The tax benefit realized from stock option exercises was $0.7 million and less than $0.1 million for each respective period.

Huntington also grants restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance share awards and other stock-based awards. Restricted stock units and awards are issued at no cost to the recipient, and can be settled only in shares at the end of the vesting period. Restricted stock awards provide the holder with full voting rights and cash dividends during the vesting period. Restricted stock units do not provide the holder with voting rights or cash dividends during the vesting period, but do accrue a dividend equivalent that is paid upon vesting, and are subject to certain service restrictions. Performance share awards are payable contingent upon Huntington achieving certain predefined performance objectives over the three-year measurement period. The fair value of these awards is the closing market price of Huntington’s common stock on the date of award.

114


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the status of Huntington’s restricted stock units and performance share awards as of June 30, 2013, and activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013:

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

Restricted
Stock
Units
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair  Value
Per Share
Performance
Share
Awards
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share

Nonvested at January 1, 2013

8,484 $ 6.40 694 $ 6.77

Granted

6,733 7.10 1,125 7.06

Vested

(477 ) 6.50

Forfeited

(569 ) 6.67 (170 ) 6.90

Nonvested at June 30, 2013

14,171 $ 6.72 1,649 $ 6.95

The weighted-average grant date fair value of nonvested shares granted for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were $7.10 and $6.71, respectively. The total fair value of awards vested was $3.1 million and $1.7 million during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, and 2012, respectively. As of June 30, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards was $70.6 million with a weighted-average expense recognition period of 2.7 years.

12. BENEFIT PLANS

Huntington sponsors the Plan, a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees hired or rehired prior to January 1, 2010. The Plan provides benefits based upon length of service and compensation levels. The funding policy of Huntington is to contribute an annual amount that is at least equal to the minimum funding requirements but not more than the amount deductible under the Internal Revenue Code. There is no required minimum contribution for 2013.

Subsequent to the end of the 2013 second quarter, the board of directors approved, and management communicated, a curtailment of the Company’s pension plan effective December 31, 2013. As a result of the accounting treatment for the unamortized prior service pension cost and the change in the projected benefit obligation, an estimated one-time, non-cash, pre-tax gain of approximately $35 million, $0.03 per share, is expected to be recognized in the 2013 third quarter.

In addition, Huntington has an unfunded defined benefit post-retirement plan that provides certain healthcare and life insurance benefits to retired employees who have attained the age of 55 and have at least 10 years of vesting service under this plan. For any employee retiring on or after January 1, 1993, post-retirement healthcare benefits are based upon the employee’s number of months of service and are limited to the actual cost of coverage. Life insurance benefits are a percentage of the employee’s base salary at the time of retirement, with a maximum of $50,000 of coverage. The employer paid portion of the post-retirement health and life insurance plan was eliminated for employees retiring on and after March 1, 2010. Eligible employees retiring on and after March 1, 2010, who elect retiree medical coverage, will pay the full cost of this coverage. Huntington will not provide any employer paid life insurance to employees retiring on and after March 1, 2010. Eligible employees will be able to convert or port their existing life insurance at their own expense under the same terms that are available to all terminated employees.

The following table shows the components of net periodic benefit expense of the Plan and the Post-Retirement Benefit Plan:

Pension Benefits
Three Months Ended

June 30,
Post Retirement Benefits
Three Months Ended
June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Service cost

$ 7,134 $ 6,217 $ $

Interest cost

7,307 7,304 215 337

Expected return on plan assets

(12,091 ) (11,433 )

Amortization of transition asset

(1 )

Amortization of prior service cost

(1,442 ) (1,442 ) (338 ) (338 )

Amortization of gains (losses)

9,784 6,740 (150 ) (83 )

Settlements

1,500 1,750

Benefit expense

$ 12,192 $ 9,135 $ (273 ) $ (84 )

115


Table of Contents
Pension Benefits
Six Months Ended
June 30,
Post Retirement Benefits
Six Months Ended
June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Service cost

$ 14,268 $ 12,434 $ $

Interest cost

14,614 14,608 431 675

Expected return on plan assets

(24,182 ) (22,865 )

Amortization of transition asset

(2 )

Amortization of prior service cost

(2,884 ) (2,884 ) (676 ) (676 )

Amortization of gains (losses)

19,568 13,479 (300 ) (166 )

Settlements

3,000 3,500

Benefit expense

$ 24,384 $ 18,270 $ (545 ) $ (167 )

The Bank, as trustee, held all Plan assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Plan assets consisted of investments in a variety of Huntington mutual funds and Huntington common stock as follows:

Fair Value

(dollar amounts in thousands)

June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012

Cash

$ 16,374 3 % $ 22 %

Cash equivalents:

Huntington funds - money market

6,012 1

Fixed income:

Huntington funds - fixed income funds

78,110 12 84,688 13

Corporate obligations

164,539 26 149,241 24

U.S. Government Obligations

47,204 8 36,595 6

U.S. Government Agencies

6,539 1 7,511 1

Equities:

Huntington funds

265,904 43 312,479 49

Exchange Traded Funds

2,678

Huntington common stock

45,659 7 37,069 6

Other common stock

470

Fair value of plan assets

$ 627,477 100 % $ 633,617 100 %

Investments of the Plan are accounted for at cost on the trade date and are reported at fair value. All of the Plan’s investments at June 30, 2013, are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy, except for corporate obligations, U.S. government obligations, and U.S. government agencies, which are classified as level 2. In general, investments of the Plan are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate risk, credit risk, and overall market volatility. Due to the level of risk associated with certain investments, it is reasonably possible changes in the values of investments will occur in the near term and such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the Plan assets.

The investment objective of the Plan is to maximize the return on Plan assets over a long time period, while meeting the Plan obligations. At June 30, 2013, Plan assets were invested 3% in cash and cash equivalents, 50% in equity investments, and 47% in bonds, with an average duration of 12 years on bond investments. Although it may fluctuate with market conditions, Management has targeted a long-term allocation of Plan assets of 20% to 50% in equity investments and 80% to 50% in bond investments. The allocation of Plan assets between equity investments and fixed income investments will change from time to time with the allocation to fixed income investments increasing as the funding level increases.

Huntington also sponsors other nonqualified retirement plans, the most significant being the SERP and the SRIP. The SERP provides certain former officers and directors, and the SRIP provides certain current and former officers and directors of Huntington and its subsidiaries with defined pension benefits in excess of limits imposed by federal tax law. Subsequent to the end of the 2013 second quarter, the board of directors approved, and management communicated, a curtailment of the Company’s SRIP plan effective December 31, 2013.

Huntington has a defined contribution plan that is available to eligible employees. Huntington matches participant contributions, up to the first 4% of base pay contributed to the Plan.

116


Table of Contents

The following table shows the costs of providing the SERP, SRIP, and defined contribution plans:

Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

SERP & SRIP

$ 1,187 $ 833 $ 2,379 $ 1,666

Defined contribution plan

4,569 4,128 8,944 8,586

Benefit cost

$ 5,756 $ 4,961 $ 11,323 $ 10,252

13. FAIR VALUES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Huntington follows the fair value accounting guidance under ASC 820 and ASC 825.

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A three-level valuation hierarchy was established for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Transfers in and out of Level 1, 2, or 3 are recorded at fair value at the beginning of the reporting period.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Mortgage loans held for sale

Huntington elected to apply the fair value option for mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell which are included in loans held for sale. Mortgage loans held for sale are classified as Level 2 and are estimated using security prices for similar product types.

Available-for-sale securities and trading account securities

Securities accounted for at fair value include both the available-for-sale and trading portfolios. Huntington uses prices obtained from third party pricing services and recent trades to determine the fair value of securities. AFS and trading securities are classified as Level 1 using quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical securities that Huntington has the ability to access at the measurement date. 1% of the positions in these portfolios are Level 1, and consist of U.S. Treasury securities and money market mutual funds. When quoted market prices are not available, fair values are classified as Level 2 using quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices of identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, and inputs that are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. 96% of the positions in these portfolios are Level 2, and consist of U.S. Government and agency debt securities, agency mortgage backed securities, asset-backed securities, municipal securities and other securities. For both Level 1 and Level 2 securities, management uses various methods and techniques to corroborate prices obtained from the pricing service, including reference to dealer or other market quotes, and by reviewing valuations of comparable instruments. If relevant market prices are limited or unavailable, valuations may require significant management judgment or estimation to determine fair value, in which case the fair values are classified as Level 3. 3% of our positions are Level 3, and consist of non-agency ALT-A asset-backed securities, private-label CMO securities, pooled-trust-preferred CDO securities and municipal securities. A significant change in the unobservable inputs for these securities may result in a significant change in the ending fair value measurement of these securities.

The Alt-A, private label CMO and pooled-trust-preferred securities portfolios are classified as Level 3 and as such use significant estimates to determine the fair value of these securities which results in greater subjectivity. The Alt-A and private label CMO securities portfolios are subjected to a monthly review of the projected cash flows, while the cash flows of the pooled-trust-preferred securities portfolio are reviewed quarterly. These reviews are supported with analysis from independent third parties, and are used as a basis for impairment analysis.

Alt-A mortgage-backed and private-label CMO securities are collateralized by first-lien residential mortgage loans. The securities valuation methodology incorporates values obtained from a third party pricing specialist using a discounted cash flow approach and a proprietary pricing model and includes assumptions management believes market participants would use to value the securities under current market conditions. The model uses inputs such as estimated prepayment speeds, losses, recoveries, default rates that are implied by the underlying performance of collateral in the structure or similar structures, house price depreciation / appreciation rates that are based upon macroeconomic forecasts and discount rates that are implied by market prices for similar securities with similar collateral structures.

117


Table of Contents

Pooled-trust-preferred securities are CDOs backed by a pool of debt securities issued by financial institutions. The collateral generally consists of trust-preferred securities and subordinated debt securities issued by banks, bank holding companies, and insurance companies. A full cash flow analysis is used to estimate fair values and assess impairment for each security within this portfolio. We engage a third party pricing specialist with direct industry experience in pooled-trust-preferred securities valuations to provide assistance in estimating the fair value and expected cash flows for each security in this portfolio. The PD of each issuer and the market discount rate are the most significant inputs in determining fair value. Management evaluates the PD assumptions provided by the third party pricing specialist by comparing the current PD to the assumptions used the previous quarter, actual defaults and deferrals in the current period, and trend data on certain financial ratios of the issuers. Huntington also evaluates the assumptions related to discount rates. Relying on cash flows is necessary because there was a lack of observable transactions in the market and many of the original sponsors or dealers for these securities are no longer able to provide a fair value that is compliant with ASC 820.

Huntington utilizes the same processes to determine the fair value of investment securities classified as held-to-maturity for impairment evaluation purposes.

Automobile loans

Effective January 1, 2010, Huntington consolidated an automobile loan securitization that previously had been accounted for as an off-balance sheet transaction. As a result, Huntington elected to account for the automobile loan receivables and the associated notes payable at fair value per guidance supplied in ASC 825. The automobile loan receivables are classified as Level 3. The key assumptions used to determine the fair value of the automobile loan receivables included projections of expected losses and prepayment of the underlying loans in the portfolio and a market assumption of interest rate spreads. Certain interest rates are available from similarly traded securities while other interest rates are developed internally based on similar asset-backed security transactions in the market.

MSRs

MSRs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the fair value of these assets is classified as Level 3. Huntington determines the fair value of MSRs using an income approach model based upon our month-end interest rate curve and prepayment assumptions. The model, which is operated and maintained by a third party, utilizes assumptions to estimate future net servicing income cash flows, including estimates of time decay, payoffs, and changes in valuation inputs and assumptions. Servicing brokers and other sources of information (e.g. discussion with other mortgage servicers and industry surveys) are used to obtain information on market practice and assumptions. On at least a quarterly basis, third party marks are obtained from at least one service broker. Huntington reviews the valuation assumptions against this market data for reasonableness and adjusts the assumptions if deemed appropriate. Any recommended change in assumptions and / or inputs are presented for review to the Mortgage Price Risk Subcommittee for final approval.

Derivatives

Derivatives classified as Level 1 consist of exchange traded options and forward commitments to deliver mortgage-backed securities which are valued using quoted prices. Asset and liability conversion swaps and options, and interest rate caps are classified as Level 2. These derivative positions are valued using a discounted cash flow method that incorporates current market interest rates. Derivatives classified as Level 3 consist primarily of interest rate lock agreements related to mortgage loan commitments. The determination of fair value includes assumptions related to the likelihood that a commitment will ultimately result in a closed loan, which is a significant unobservable assumption. A significant increase or decrease in the external market price would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.

Securitization trust notes payable

Consists of certain securitization trust notes payable related to the automobile loan receivables measured at fair value. The notes payable are classified as Level 2 and are valued based on interest rates for similar financial instruments.

118


Table of Contents

Assets and Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are summarized below:

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

Netting Balance at

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Adjustments (1) June 30, 2013

Assets

Loans held for sale

$ $ 418,386 $ $ $ 418,386

Trading account securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed

Federal agencies: Other agencies

Municipal securities

5,668 5,668

Other securities

75,145 114 75,259

75,145 5,782 80,927

Available-for-sale and other securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

51,778 51,778

Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed

3,502,077 3,502,077

Federal agencies: Other agencies

345,114 345,114

Municipal securities

513,563 58,100 571,663

Private-label CMO

19,908 32,926 52,834

Asset-backed securities

1,061,069 119,861 1,180,930

Covered bonds

286,911 286,911

Corporate debt

485,563 485,563

Other securities

18,846 3,770 22,616

70,624 6,217,975 210,887 6,499,486

Automobile loans

91,140 91,140

MSRs

37,544 37,544

Derivative assets

47,821 259,971 1,581 (60,591 ) 248,782

Liabilities

Derivative liabilities

18,083 162,163 5,807 (46,556 ) 139,497

Other liabilities

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

Netting Balance at

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Adjustments (1) December 31, 2012

Assets

Mortgage loans held for sale

$ $ 452,949 $ $ $ 452,949

Trading account securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed

Federal agencies: Other agencies

Municipal securities

15,218 15,218

Other securities

75,729 258 75,987

75,729 15,476 91,205

Available-for-sale and other securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

52,311 52,311

Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed

4,264,670 4,264,670

Federal agencies: Other agencies

359,626 359,626

Municipal securities

439,772 61,228 501,000

Private-label CMO

22,793 48,775 71,568

Asset-backed securities

919,046 110,037 1,029,083

Covered bonds

290,625 290,625

Corporate debt

668,142 668,142

Other securities

17,177 3,898 21,075

69,488 6,968,572 220,040 7,258,100

Automobile loans

142,762 142,762

MSRs

35,202 35,202

Derivative assets

6,368 465,517 13,180 (99,368 ) 385,697

Liabilities

Derivative liabilities

6,813 228,312 478 (83,415 ) 152,188

Other liabilities

(1) Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle positive and negative positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

119


Table of Contents

The tables below present a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, for financial instruments measured on a recurring basis and classified as Level 3. The classification of an item as Level 3 is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 measurements may also include observable components of value that can be validated externally. Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Available-for-sale securities

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs Derivative
instruments
Municipal
securities
Private-
label CMO
Asset-
backed
securities
Automobile
loans

Opening balance

$ 35,582 $ 9,006 $ 59,098 $ 45,546 $ 115,455 $ 116,039

Transfers into Level 3

Transfers out of Level 3

Total gains/losses for the period:

Included in earnings

1,962 (11,676 ) 29 (1,557 ) (504 )

Included in OCI

537 (814 ) 7,897

Purchases

Sales

(10,254 )

Repayments

(24,395 )

Issues

Settlements

(1,556 ) (1,535 ) (1,581 ) (1,934 )

Closing balance

$ 37,544 $ (4,226 ) $ 58,100 $ 32,926 $ 119,861 $ 91,140

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) for assets held at end of the reporting date

$ 1,962 $ (13,232 ) $ 537 $ (814 ) $ 7,897 $ (504 )

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Available-for-sale securities

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs Derivative
instruments
Municipal
securities
Private-
label CMO
Asset-
backed
securities
Automobile
loans

Opening balance

$ 62,454 $ 7,443 $ 85,447 $ 70,231 $ 125,696 $ 250,774

Transfers into Level 3

Transfers out of Level 3

Total gains/losses for the period:

Included in earnings

(17,393 ) 5,496 (16 ) 40 (558 )

Included in OCI

706 (2,615 )

Purchases

Sales

(7,000 )

Repayments

(40,185 )

Issues

Settlements

(548 ) (296 ) (3,776 ) (3,447 )

Closing balance

$ 45,061 $ 12,391 $ 78,151 $ 67,145 $ 119,674 $ 210,031

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) for assets held at end of the reporting date

$ (17,393 ) $ 4,949 $ $ 706 $ (2,615 ) $ (558 )

120


Table of Contents
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Available-for-sale securities

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs Derivative
instruments
Municipal
securities
Private-
label CMO
Asset-
backed
securities
Automobile
loans

Opening balance

$ 35,202 $ 12,702 $ 61,228 $ 48,775 $ 110,037 $ 142,762

Transfers into Level 3

Transfers out of Level 3

Total gains/losses for the period:

Included in earnings

2,342 (13,158 ) (240 ) (2,296 ) 633

Included in OCI

692 77 20,686

Purchases

Sales

(10,254 )

Repayments

(52,255 )

Issues

Settlements

(3,770 ) (3,820 ) (5,432 ) (8,566 )

Closing balance

$ 37,544 $ (4,226 ) $ 58,100 $ 32,926 $ 119,861 $ 91,140

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) for assets held at end of the reporting date

$ 2,342 $ (16,928 ) $ 692 $ 77 $ 20,686 $ 633

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Available-for-sale securities

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs Derivative
instruments
Municipal
securities
Private-
label CMO
Asset-
backed
securities
Automobile
loans

Opening balance

$ 65,001 $ (169 ) $ 95,092 $ 72,364 $ 121,698 $ 296,250

Transfers into Level 3

Transfers out of Level 3

Total gains/losses for the period:

Included in earnings

(19,940 ) 6,221 (1,006 ) (136 ) (650 )

Included in OCI

4,879 5,178

Purchases

Sales

(7,000 )

Repayments

(85,569 )

Issues

Settlements

6,339 (9,941 ) (9,092 ) (7,066 )

Closing balance

$ 45,061 $ 12,391 $ 78,151 $ 67,145 $ 119,674 $ 210,031

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) for assets held at end of the reporting date

$ (19,940 ) $ 5,508 $ $ 4,879 $ 5,178 $ (650 )

121


Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the classification of gains and losses due to changes in fair value, recorded in earnings for Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Available-for-sale securities

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs Derivative
instruments
Municipal
securities
Private-
label CMO
Asset-
backed
securities
Automobile
loans

Classification of gains and losses in earnings:

Mortgage banking income (loss)

$ 1,962 $ (11,676 ) $ $ $ $

Securities gains (losses)

(1,020 )

Interest and fee income

29 (537 ) (1,165 )

Noninterest income

661

Total

$ 1,962 $ (11,676 ) $ $ 29 $ (1,557 ) $ (504 )

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Available-for-sale securities

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs Derivative
instruments
Municipal
securities
Private-
label CMO
Asset-
backed
securities
Automobile
loans

Classification of gains and losses in earnings:

Mortgage banking income (loss)

$ (17,393 ) $ 5,496 $ $ $ $

Securities gains (losses)

(249 )

Interest and fee income

233 40 (2,265 )

Noninterest income

1,707

Total

$ (17,393 ) $ 5,496 $ $ (16 ) $ 40 $ (558 )

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Available-for-sale securities

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs Derivative
instruments
Municipal
securities
Private-
label CMO
Asset-
backed
securities
Automobile
loans

Classification of gains and losses in earnings:

Mortgage banking income (loss)

$ 2,342 $ (13,158 ) $ $ $ $

Securities gains (losses)

(336 ) (1,379 )

Interest and fee income

96 (917 ) (2,024 )

Noninterest income

2,657

Total

$ 2,342 $ (13,158 ) $ $ (240 ) $ (2,296 ) $ 633

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Available-for-sale securities

(dollar amounts in thousands)

MSRs Derivative
instruments
Municipal
securities
Private-
label CMO
Asset-
backed
securities
Automobile
loans

Classification of gains and losses in earnings:

Mortgage banking income (loss)

$ (19,940 ) $ 6,889 $ $ $

Securities gains (losses)

(1,485 )

Interest and fee income

479 (136 ) (4,289 )

Noninterest income

(668 ) 3,639

Total

$ (19,940 ) $ 6,221 $ $ (1,006 ) $ (136 ) $ (650 )

122


Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities under the fair value option

The following table presents the fair value and aggregate principal balance of certain assets and liabilities under the fair value option:

June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Fair value
carrying
amount
Aggregate
unpaid
principal
Difference Fair value
carrying
amount
Aggregate
unpaid
principal
Difference

Assets

Mortgage loans held for sale

$ 418,386 $ 429,036 $ (10,650 ) $ 452,949 $ 438,254 $ 14,695

Automobile loans

91,140 88,662 2,478 142,762 140,916 1,846

Liabilities

The following tables present the net gains (losses) from fair value changes, including net gains (losses) associated with instrument specific credit risk for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Net gains (losses) from fair value changes
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Assets

Mortgage loans held for sale

$ (20,681 ) $ 8,585 $ (25,344 ) $ 3,690

Automobile loans

(504 ) (558 ) 632 (651 )

Liabilities

Securitization trust notes payable

(579 ) (1,922 )

Gains (losses) included
in fair value changes associated
with instrument specific credit risk
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Assets

Automobile loans

$ 826 $ 2,012 $ 1,153 $ 2,578

Assets and Liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

Certain assets and liabilities may be required to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition. These assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an on-going basis; however, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment. At June 30, 2013, assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as follows:

Fair Value Measurements Using

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Fair Value at
June 30, 2013
Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Other
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
Total
Gains/(Losses)
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30, 2013

Impaired loans

$ 18,721 $ $ $ 18,721 $ (5,458 )

Accrued income and other assets

21,066 21,066 (1,165 )

Periodically, Huntington records nonrecurring adjustments of collateral-dependent loans measured for impairment when establishing the ACL. Such amounts are generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan. Appraisals are generally obtained to support the fair value of the collateral and incorporate measures such as recent sales prices for comparable properties and cost of construction. In cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, an impairment charge is recognized. At June 30, 2013, Huntington identified $18.7 million of impaired loans for which the fair value is recorded based upon collateral value. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, nonrecurring fair value impairment of $5.5 million was recorded within the provision for credit losses.

123


Table of Contents

Other real estate owned properties are initially valued based on appraisals and third party price opinions, less estimated selling costs. At June 30, 2013, Huntington had $21.1 million of OREO assets. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, fair value losses of $1.2 million were recorded within noninterest expense.

Significant unobservable inputs for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis

The table below presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Fair Value at
June 30,  2013

Valuation
Technique

Significant Unobservable Input Range (Weighted Average)

MSRs

$ 37,544 Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 7.0% - 42.0% (12.0%)

Spread over forward interest
rate swap rates

-437 - 4,569 (1,233)

Derivative assets

1,581 Consensus Pricing Net market price -8.3% - 11.5% (-1.0%)

Derivative liabilities

5,807 Estimated Pull thru % 50.0% - 90.0% (76.0%)

Municipal securities

58,100 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 1.7% - 12.0% (3.2%)

Private-label CMO

32,926 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 4.4% - 8.7% (7.0%)
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 9.2% - 26.7% (16.1%)
Probability of default 0.1% - 4.0% (0.7%)
Loss Severity 4.0% - 64.0% (32.1%)

Asset-backed securities

119,861 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 4.0% - 15.8% (8.6%)
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 5.1% - 5.1% (5.1%)
Cumulative prepayment rate 0.0% - 100.0% (17.1%)
Constant default 1.4% - 4.0% (2.8%)
Cumulative default 0.8% - 100.0% (18.0%)
Loss given default 85.0% - 100.0% (94.6%)
Cure given deferral 0.0% - 90.0% (36.6%)
Loss severity 48.0% - 68.0% (62.6%)

Automobile loans

91,140 Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 15.6%
Discount rate 0.3% - 5.0% (1.4%)

Impaired loans

18,721 Appraisal value NA NA

Other real estate owned

21,066 Appraisal value NA NA

124


Table of Contents

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Fair Value at
December 31,
2012

Valuation

Technique

Significant Unobservable Input

Range (Weighted
Average)

MSRs

$35,202 Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 10.0% - 31.0% (20.0%)
Spread over forward interest rate swap rates -568 - 4,552 (1,288)

Derivative assets

13,180 Consensus Pricing Net market price -2.3% - 10.8% (3.0%)

Derivative liabilities

478 Estimated Pull thru % 38.0% - 89.0% (75.0%)

Municipal securities

61,228 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 1.7% - 12.0% (3.1%)

Private-label CMO

48,775 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 3.0% - 8.5% (6.2%)
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 5.1% - 26.7% (14.8%)
Probability of default 0.1% - 4.0% (1.0%)
Loss Severity 0.0% - 64.0% (27.8%)

Asset-backed securities

110,037 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 4.5% - 16.6% (9.0%)
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 5.1% - 9.8% (5.3%)
Cumulative prepayment rate 0.0% - 100.0% (6.9%)
Constant default 0.3% - 4.0% (2.8%)
Cumulative default 1.1% - 100.0% (20.1%)
Loss given default 85.0% - 100.0% (92.4%)
Cure given deferral 0.0% - 90.0% (34.7%)
Loss severity 20.0% - 72.0% (64.9%)

Automobile loans

142,762 Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 15.6%
Discount rate 0.8% - 5.0% (4.0%)

Impaired loans

150,873 Appraisal value

Other real estate owned

28,097 Appraisal value

The following provides a general description of the impact of a change in an unobservable input on the fair value measurement and the interrelationship between unobservable inputs, where relevant/significant. Interrelationships may also exist between observable and unobservable inputs. Such relationships have not been included in the discussion below.

A significant change in the unobservable inputs may result in a significant change in the ending fair value measurement of Level 3 instruments. In general, prepayment rates increase when market interest rates decline and decrease when market interest rates rise and higher prepayment rates generally result in lower fair values for MSR assets, Private-label CMO securities, Asset-backed securities, and automobile loans.

Credit loss estimates, such as probability of default, constant default, cumulative default, loss given default, cure given deferral, and loss severity, are driven by the ability of the borrowers to pay their loans and the value of the underlying collateral and are impacted by changes in macroeconomic conditions, typically increasing when economic conditions worsen and decreasing when conditions improve. An increase in the estimated prepayment rate typically results in a decrease in estimated credit losses and vice versa. Higher credit loss estimates generally result in lower fair values. Credit spreads generally increase when liquidity risks and market volatility increase and decrease when liquidity conditions and market volatility improve.

Discount rates and spread over forward interest rate swap rates typically increase when market interest rates increase and/or credit and liquidity risks increase and decrease when market interest rates decline and/or credit and liquidity conditions improve. Higher discount rates and credit spreads generally result in lower fair market values.

Net market price and pull through percentages generally increase when market interest rates increase and decline when market interest rates decline. Higher net market price and pull through percentages generally result in higher fair values.

125


Table of Contents

Fair values of financial instruments

The following table provides the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of Huntington’s financial instruments that are carried either at fair value or cost at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Amount Value Amount Value

Financial Assets:

Cash and short-term assets

$ 1,069,621 $ 1,069,621 $ 1,333,727 $ 1,333,727

Trading account securities

80,927 80,927 91,205 91,205

Loans held for sale

458,275 458,275 764,309 773,013

Available-for-sale and other securities

6,815,658 6,815,658 7,566,175 7,566,175

Held-to-maturity securities

2,172,229 2,166,749 1,743,876 1,794,105

Net loans and leases

41,006,771 39,356,382 39,959,350 38,401,965

Derivatives

248,782 248,782 385,697 385,697

Financial Liabilities:

Deposits

46,331,434 46,415,586 46,252,683 46,330,715

Short-term borrowings

630,405 623,551 589,814 584,671

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

983,420 983,420 1,008,959 1,008,959

Other long-term debt

155,126 154,578 158,784 156,719

Subordinated notes

1,114,368 1,129,481 1,197,091 1,183,827

Derivatives

139,497 139,497 152,188 152,188

The following table presents the level in the fair value hierarchy for the estimated fair values of only Huntington’s financial instruments that are not already on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Estimated Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Balance at

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 June 30, 2013

Financial Assets

Loans held for sale

$ $ $ $

Held-to-maturity securities

2,166,749 2,166,749

Net loans and leases

39,265,242 39,265,242

Financial liabilities

Deposits

40,542,678 5,872,908 46,415,586

Short-term borrowings

623,551 623,551

Other long-term debt

154,578 154,578

Subordinated notes

1,129,481 1,129,481
Estimated Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Balance at

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 December 31, 2012

Financial Assets

Loans held for sale

$ $ $ 316,007 $ 316,007

Held-to-maturity securities

1,794,105 1,794,105

Net loans and leases

38,259,203 38,259,203

Financial liabilities

Deposits

39,136,127 7,194,588 46,330,715

Short-term borrowings

584,671 584,671

Other long-term debt

2,124 154,595 156,719

Subordinated notes

1,183,827 1,183,827

The short-term nature of certain assets and liabilities result in their carrying value approximating fair value. These include trading account securities, customers’ acceptance liabilities, short-term borrowings, bank acceptances outstanding, FHLB advances, and cash and short-term assets, which include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in banks, and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. Loan commitments and letters-of-credit generally have short-term, variable-rate features and contain clauses that limit Huntington’s exposure to changes in customer credit quality. Accordingly, their carrying values, which are immaterial at the respective balance sheet dates, are reasonable estimates of fair value. Not all the financial instruments listed in the table above are subject to the disclosure provisions of ASC Topic 820.

126


Table of Contents

Certain assets, the most significant being operating lease assets, bank owned life insurance, and premises and equipment, do not meet the definition of a financial instrument and are excluded from this disclosure. Similarly, mortgage and nonmortgage servicing rights, deposit base, and other customer relationship intangibles are not considered financial instruments and are not included above. Accordingly, this fair value information is not intended to, and does not, represent Huntington’s underlying value. Many of the assets and liabilities subject to the disclosure requirements are not actively traded, requiring fair values to be estimated by Management. These estimations necessarily involve the use of judgment about a wide variety of factors, including but not limited to, relevancy of market prices of comparable instruments, expected future cash flows, and appropriate discount rates.

The following methods and assumptions were used by Huntington to estimate the fair value of the remaining classes of financial instruments:

Held-to-maturity securities

Fair values are determined by using models that are based on security-specific details, as well as relevant industry and economic factors. The most significant of these inputs are quoted market prices, and interest rate spreads on relevant benchmark securities.

Loans and direct financing leases

Variable-rate loans that reprice frequently are based on carrying amounts, as adjusted for estimated credit losses. The fair values for other loans and leases are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses and employ interest rates currently being offered for loans and leases with similar terms. The rates take into account the position of the yield curve, as well as an adjustment for prepayment risk, operating costs, and profit. This value is also reduced by an estimate of expected losses and the credit risk associated in the loan and lease portfolio. The valuation of the loan portfolio reflected discounts that Huntington believed are consistent with transactions occurring in the marketplace.

Deposits

Demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair values of fixed-rate time deposits are estimated by discounting cash flows using interest rates currently being offered on certificates with similar maturities.

Debt

Fixed-rate, long-term debt is based upon quoted market prices, which are inclusive of Huntington’s credit risk. In the absence of quoted market prices, discounted cash flows using market rates for similar debt with the same maturities are used in the determination of fair value.

14. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Derivative financial instruments are recorded in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as either an asset or a liability (in accrued income and other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively) and measured at fair value.

Derivatives used in Asset and Liability Management Activities

A variety of derivative financial instruments, principally interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and collars are used in asset and liability management activities to protect against the risk of adverse price or interest rate movements. These instruments provide flexibility in adjusting Huntington’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates without exposure to loss of principal and higher funding requirements.

The following table presents the gross notional values of derivatives used in Huntington’s asset and liability management activities at June 30, 2013, identified by the underlying interest rate-sensitive instruments:

Fair Value Cash Flow

(dollar amounts in thousands )

Hedges Hedges Total

Instruments associated with:

Loans

$ $ 8,894,000 $ 8,894,000

Deposits

356,175 356,175

Subordinated notes

598,000 598,000

Other long-term debt

35,000 35,000

Total notional value at June 30, 2013

$ 989,175 $ 8,894,000 $ 9,883,175

127


Table of Contents

The following table presents additional information about the interest rate swaps used in Huntington’s asset and liability management activities at June 30, 2013:

Average Weighted-Average
Notional Maturity Fair Rate

(dollar amounts in thousands )

Value (years) Value Receive Pay

Asset conversion swaps

Receive fixed - generic

$ 8,894,000 2.7 $ (38,240 ) 0.91 % 0.37 %

Total asset conversion swaps

8,894,000 2.7 (38,240 ) 0.91 0.37

Liability conversion swaps

Receive fixed - generic

989,175 3.6 73,638 3.37 0.37

Total liability conversion swaps

989,175 3.6 73,638 3.37 0.37

Total swap portfolio

$ 9,883,175 2.8 $ 35,398 1.16 % 0.37 %

These derivative financial instruments were entered into for the purpose of managing the interest rate risk of assets and liabilities. Consequently, net amounts receivable or payable on contracts hedging either interest earning assets or interest bearing liabilities were accrued as an adjustment to either interest income or interest expense. The net amounts resulted in an increase to net interest income of $25.0 million and $27.7 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013, and 2012, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the net amounts resulted in an increase to net interest income of $50.1 million and $52.4 million, respectively.

In connection with the sale of Huntington’s Class B Visa ® shares, Huntington entered into a swap agreement with the purchaser of the shares. The swap agreement adjusts for dilution in the conversion ratio of Class B shares resulting from the Visa ® litigation. At June 30, 2013, the fair value of the swap liability of $0.4 million is an estimate of the exposure liability based upon Huntington’s assessment of the probability-weighted potential Visa ® litigation losses and certain fixed payments required to be made through the term of the swap.

The following table presents the fair values at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 of Huntington’s financial instruments. Amounts in the table below are presented gross without the impact of any net collateral arrangements:

Asset derivatives included in accrued income and other assets:

June 30, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Interest rate contracts designated as hedging instruments

$ 60,591 $ 169,222

Interest rate contracts not designated as hedging instruments

199,380 296,295

Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments

18,744 5,605

Commodities contracts not designated as hedging instruments

697

Total contracts

$ 279,412 $ 471,122

Liability derivatives included in accrued expenses and other liabilities

June 30, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Interest rate contracts designated as hedging instruments

$ 25,193 $

Interest rate contracts not designated as hedging instruments

137,415 228,757

Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments

16,760 4,655

Commodities contracts not designated as hedging instruments

604

Total contracts

$ 179,972 $ 233,412

Fair value hedges are established to convert deposits and subordinated and other long-term debt from fixed-rate obligations to floating rate. The changes in fair value of the derivative are, to the extent that the hedging relationship is effective, recorded through earnings and offset against changes in the fair value of the hedged item.

128


Table of Contents

The following table presents the change in fair value for derivatives designated as fair value hedges as well as the offsetting change in fair value on the hedged item for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Interest rate contracts

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging deposits (1)

$ (1,560 ) $ (968 ) $ (3,314 ) $ (436 )

Change in fair value of hedged deposits (1)

1,557 1,006 3,304 413

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging subordinated notes (2)

(23,899 ) 14,516 (32,020 ) 5,759

Change in fair value of hedged subordinated notes (2)

23,899 (14,516 ) 32,020 (5,759 )

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging other long-term debt (2)

(1,175 ) 631 (1,572 ) 284

Change in fair value of hedged other long-term debt (2)

1,175 (631 ) 1,572 (284 )

(1) Effective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in Interest expense—deposits in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Any resulting ineffective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2) Effective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in Interest expense—subordinated notes and other long-term debt in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Any resulting ineffective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

For cash flow hedges, interest rate swap contracts were entered into that pay fixed-rate interest in exchange for the receipt of variable-rate interest without the exchange of the contract’s underlying notional amount, which effectively converts a portion of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate debt. This reduces the potentially adverse impact of increases in interest rates on future interest expense. Other LIBOR-based commercial and industrial loans as well as investment securities were effectively converted to fixed-rate by entering into contracts that swap certain variable-rate interest payments for fixed-rate interest payments at designated times.

To the extent these derivatives are effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flows, changes in the derivatives’ fair value will not be included in current earnings but are reported as a component of OCI in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity. These changes in fair value will be included in earnings of future periods when earnings are also affected by the changes in the hedged cash flows. To the extent these derivatives are not effective, changes in their fair values are immediately included in noninterest income.

129


Table of Contents

The following table presents the gains and (losses) recognized in OCI and the location in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income of gains and (losses) reclassified from OCI into earnings for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 for derivatives designated as effective cash flow hedges:

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships

Amount of gain or
(loss) recognized in
OCI on derivatives
(effective portion)
(after-tax)

Location of gain or (loss) reclassified from

accumulated OCI into earnings (effective portion)

Amount of (gain) or loss
reclassified from
accumulated OCI into

earnings (effective
portion)
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Interest rate contracts

Loans

$ (53,511 ) $ 15,832 Interest and fee income - loans and leases $ (4,374 ) $ 1,926

Investment Securities

(738 ) Noninterest income - other income (85 )

FHLB Advances

Interest expense - federal home loan bank advances

Deposits

Interest expense - deposits

Subordinated notes

Interest expense - subordinated notes and other long-term debt 6

Other long term debt

Interest expense - subordinated notes and other long-term debt

Total

$ (53,511 ) $ 15,094 $ (4,459 ) $ 1,932

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships

Amount of gain or (loss)
recognized in OCI on
derivatives (effective
portion) (after-tax)

Location of gain or (loss) reclassified from

accumulated OCI into earnings (effective portion)

Amount of (gain) or
loss reclassified from
accumulated OCI into
earnings (effective
portion)
Six Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Interest rate contracts

Loans

$ (63,849 ) $ (9,995 ) Interest and fee income - loans and leases $ (8,290 ) $ 26,712

Investment Securities

(703 ) Interest and fee income - investment securities (195 )

FHLB Advances

Interest expense - federal home loan bank advances

Deposits

Interest expense - deposits

Subordinated notes

Interest expense - subordinated notes and other long-term debt 13

Other long term debt

Interest expense - subordinated notes and other long-term debt

Total

$ (63,849 ) $ (10,698 ) $ (8,485 ) $ 26,725

During the next twelve months, Huntington expects to reclassify to earnings $27.6 million of after-tax unrealized gains on cash flow hedging derivatives currently in OCI.

The following table details the gains and (losses) recognized in noninterest income on the ineffective portion on interest rate contracts for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships

Interest rate contracts

Loans

$ 620 $ 31 $ 908 $ 45

FHLB Advances

130


Table of Contents

Derivatives used in trading activities

Various derivative financial instruments are offered to enable customers to meet their financing and investing objectives and for their risk management purposes. Derivative financial instruments used in trading activities consisted predominantly of interest rate swaps, but also included interest rate caps, floors, and futures, as well as foreign exchange options and commodity contracts. Interest rate options grant the option holder the right to buy or sell an underlying financial instrument for a predetermined price before the contract expires. Interest rate futures are commitments to either purchase or sell a financial instrument at a future date for a specified price or yield and may be settled in cash or through delivery of the underlying financial instrument. Interest rate caps and floors are option-based contracts that entitle the buyer to receive cash payments based on the difference between a designated reference rate and a strike price, applied to a notional amount. Written options, primarily caps, expose Huntington to market risk but not credit risk. Purchased options contain both credit and market risk. The interest rate risk of these customer derivatives is mitigated by entering into similar derivatives having offsetting terms with other counterparties. The credit risk to these customers is evaluated and included in the calculation of fair value.

The net fair values of these derivative financial instruments, for which the gross amounts are included in accrued income and other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, were $65.4 million and $63.4 million, respectively. The total notional values of derivative financial instruments used by Huntington on behalf of customers, including offsetting derivatives, were $12.8 billion and $12.0 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Huntington’s credit risks from derivative financial instruments used for trading purposes were $187.1 million and $296.1 million at the same dates, respectively.

Financial assets and liabilities that are offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

Huntington records derivatives at fair value as further described in Note 13. Huntington records these derivatives net of any master netting arrangement in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Collateral agreements are regularly entered into as part of the underlying derivative agreements with Huntington’s counterparties to mitigate counterparty credit risk.

All derivatives are carried on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Derivative balances are presented on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements. Cash collateral exchanged with counterparties is also netted against the applicable derivative fair values. Huntington enters into derivative transactions with two primary groups: broker-dealers and banks, and Huntington’s customers. Different methods are utilized for managing counterparty credit exposure and credit risk for each of these groups.

Huntington enters into transactions with broker-dealers and banks for various risk management purposes. These types of transactions generally are high dollar volume. Huntington enters into bilateral collateral and master netting agreements with these counterparties, and routinely exchange cash and high quality securities collateral with these counterparties. Huntington enters into transactions with customers to meet their financing, investing, payment and risk management needs. These types of transactions generally are low dollar volume. Huntington generally enters into master netting agreements with customer counterparties, however collateral is generally not exchanged with customer counterparties.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, aggregate credit risk associated with these derivatives, net of collateral that has been pledged by the counterparty, was $23.4 million and $17.4 million, respectively. The credit risk associated with interest rate swaps is calculated after considering master netting agreements with broker-dealers and banks.

At June 30, 2013, Huntington pledged $162.1 million of investment securities and cash collateral to counterparties, while other counterparties pledged $106.5 million of investment securities and cash collateral to Huntington to satisfy collateral netting agreements. In the event of credit downgrades, Huntington would not be required to provide additional collateral.

131


Table of Contents

The following tables present the gross amounts of these assets and liabilities with any offsets to arrive at the net amounts recognized in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets

Gross amounts not offset in
the condensed consolidated
balance sheets

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Gross amounts
of recognized
assets
Gross amounts
offset in the
condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
Net amounts of
assets
presented in
the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
Financial
instruments
cash collateral
received
Net amount

Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets

June 30, 2013

Derivatives $ 324,928 $ (106,107 ) $ 218,821 $ (38,509 ) $ (7,424 ) $ 172,888

December 31, 2012

Derivatives 473,374 (101,620 ) 371,754 (62,409 ) (755 ) 308,590

Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities

Gross amounts not offset in
the condensed consolidated
balance sheets

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Gross amounts
of recognized
liabilities
Gross amounts
offset in the
condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
Net amounts of
assets
presented in
the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
Financial
instruments
cash collateral
received
Net amount

Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities

June 30, 2013

Derivatives $ 225,488 $ (92,072 ) $ 133,416 $ (112,279 ) $ (4,116 ) $ 17,021

December 31, 2012

Derivatives 235,664 (85,667 ) 149,997 (97,233 ) (455 ) 52,309

Derivatives used in mortgage banking activities

Huntington also uses certain derivative financial instruments to offset changes in value of its MSRs. These derivatives consist primarily of forward interest rate agreements and forward commitments to deliver mortgage-backed securities. The derivative instruments used are not designated as hedges. Accordingly, such derivatives are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in mortgage banking income . The following table summarizes the derivative assets and liabilities used in mortgage banking activities

June 30, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Derivative assets:

Interest rate lock agreements

$ 1,581 $ 13,180

Forward trades and options

28,380 763

Total derivative assets

29,961 13,943

Derivative liabilities:

Interest rate lock agreements

(5,362 ) (33 )

Forward trades and options

(719 ) (2,158 )

Total derivative liabilities

(6,081 ) (2,191 )

Net derivative asset (liability)

$ 23,880 $ 11,752

The total notional value of these derivative financial instruments at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, was $0.7 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively. The total notional amount at June 30, 2013, corresponds to trading assets with a fair value of $2.0 million and trading liabilities with a fair value of $2.9 million. Total MSR hedging gains and (losses) for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were $(15.8) million and $19.8 million, respectively and $(23.6) million and $17.6 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Included in total MSR hedging gains and losses for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were net gains and (losses) related to derivative instruments of $(15.8) million and $19.8 million, respectively, and $(23.6) million and $17.6 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These amounts are included in mortgage banking income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

132


Table of Contents

15. VIEs

Consolidated VIEs

Consolidated VIEs at June 30, 2013, consisted of automobile loan and lease securitization trusts formed in 2009 and 2006. Huntington has determined the trusts are VIEs. Huntington has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of these trusts because it has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and it has either the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The following tables present the carrying amount and classification of the consolidated trusts’ assets and liabilities that were included in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

June 30, 2013
2009 2006 Other
Automobile Automobile Consolidated

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Trust Trust Trusts Total

Assets:

Cash

$ 10,433 $ 123,872 $ $ 134,305

Loans and leases

91,140 237,058 328,198

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(1,683 ) (1,683 )

Net loans and leases

91,140 235,375 326,515

Accrued income and other assets

395 765 277 1,437

Total assets

$ 101,968 $ 360,012 $ 277 $ 462,257

Liabilities:

Other long-term debt

$ $ $ $

Accrued interest and other liabilities

277 277

Total liabilities

$ $ $ 277 $ 277

December 31, 2012
2009 2006 Other
Automobile Automobile Consolidated

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Trust Trust Trusts Total

Assets:

Cash

$ 12,577 $ 91,113 $ $ 103,690

Loans and leases

142,762 356,162 498,924

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(2,671 ) (2,671 )

Net loans and leases

142,762 353,491 496,253

Accrued income and other assets

617 1,353 288 2,258

Total assets

$ 155,956 $ 445,957 $ 288 $ 602,201

Liabilities:

Other long-term debt

$ $ 2,086 $ $ 2,086

Accrued interest and other liabilities

1 288 289

Total liabilities

$ $ 2,087 $ 288 $ 2,375

133


Table of Contents

The automobile loans and leases were designated to repay the securitized notes. Huntington services the loans and leases and uses the proceeds from principal and interest payments to pay the securitized notes during the amortization period. Huntington has not provided financial or other support that was not previously contractually required.

Unconsolidated VIEs

The following tables provide a summary of the assets and liabilities included in Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the maximum exposure to losses, associated with its interests related to unconsolidated VIEs for which Huntington holds an interest, but is not the primary beneficiary, to the VIE at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012:

June 30, 2013

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Total Assets Total Liabilities Maximum Exposure to Loss

2012-1 Automobile Trust

$ 8,817 $ $ 8,817

2012-2 Automobile Trust

10,346 10,346

2011 Automobile Trust

4,806 4,806

Tower Hill Securities, Inc.

84,449 65,000 84,449

Trust Preferred Securities

13,764 312,894

Low Income Housing Tax Credit Partnerships

345,226 127,673 345,226

Total

$ 467,408 $ 505,567 $ 453,644

December 31, 2012

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Total Assets Total Liabilities Maximum Exposure to Loss

2012-1 Automobile Trust

$ 12,649 $ $ 12,649

2012-2 Automobile Trust

13,616 13,616

2011 Automobile Trust

7,076 7,076

Tower Hill Securities, Inc.

87,075 65,000 87,075

Trust Preferred Securities

13,764 312,894

Low Income Housing Tax Credit Partnerships

391,878 152,047 391,878

Total

$ 526,058 $ 529,941 $ 512,294

2012-1 AUTOMOBILE TRUST, 2012-2 AUTOMOBILE TRUST, and 2011 AUTOMOBILE TRUST

During the 2012 fourth quarter, 2012 first quarter and 2011 third quarter, we transferred automobile loans totaling $1.0 billion, $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, to trusts in securitization transactions. The securitizations and the resulting sale of all underlying securities qualified for sale accounting. Huntington has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of these trusts because it has neither the obligation to absorb losses of the entities that could potentially be significant to the VIEs nor the right to receive benefits from the entities that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. Huntington is not required and does not currently intend to provide any additional financial support to the trusts. Investors and creditors only have recourse to the assets held by the trusts. The interest Huntington holds in the VIEs relates to servicing rights which are included within accrued income and other assets of Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The maximum exposure to loss is equal to the carrying value of the servicing asset.

TOWER HILL SECURITIES, INC.

In 2010, we transferred approximately $92.1 million of municipal securities, $86.0 million in Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (Real Estate Investment Trust) Class E Preferred Stock and cash of $6.1 million to Tower Hill Securities, Inc. in exchange for $184.1 million of Common and Preferred Stock of Tower Hill Securities, Inc. The municipal securities and the REIT Shares will be used to satisfy $65.0 million of mandatorily redeemable securities issued by Tower Hill Securities, Inc. and are not available to satisfy the general debts and obligations of Huntington or any consolidated affiliates. The transfer was recorded as a secured financing. Interests held by Huntington consist of municipal securities within available for sale and other securities and Series B preferred securities within other long term debt of Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The maximum exposure to loss is equal to the carrying value of the municipal securities.

134


Table of Contents

TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES

Huntington has certain wholly-owned trusts whose assets, liabilities, equity, income, and expenses are not included within Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. These trusts have been formed for the sole purpose of issuing trust-preferred securities, from which the proceeds are then invested in Huntington junior subordinated debentures, which are reflected in Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as subordinated notes. The trust securities are the obligations of the trusts, and as such, are not consolidated within Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. A list of trust preferred securities outstanding at June 30, 2013 follows:

Principal amount of Investment in
subordinated note/ unconsolidated

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Rate debenture issued to trust (1) subsidiary

Huntington Capital I

0.98 %(2) $ 111,816 $ 6,186

Huntington Capital II

0.90 (3) 54,593 3,093

Sky Financial Capital Trust III

1.67 (4) 72,165 2,165

Sky Financial Capital Trust IV

1.68 (4) 74,320 2,320

Total

$ 312,894 $ 13,764

(1) Represents the principal amount of debentures issued to each trust, including unamortized original issue discount.
(2) Variable effective rate at June 30, 2013, based on three month LIBOR + 0.70.
(3) Variable effective rate at June 30, 2013, based on three month LIBOR + 0.625.
(4) Variable effective rate at June 30, 2013, based on three month LIBOR + 1.40.

Each issue of the junior subordinated debentures has an interest rate equal to the corresponding trust securities distribution rate. Huntington has the right to defer payment of interest on the debentures at any time, or from time-to-time for a period not exceeding five years provided that no extension period may extend beyond the stated maturity of the related debentures. During any such extension period, distributions to the trust securities will also be deferred and Huntington’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock will be restricted. Periodic cash payments and payments upon liquidation or redemption with respect to trust securities are guaranteed by Huntington to the extent of funds held by the trusts. The guarantee ranks subordinate and junior in right of payment to all indebtedness of the Company to the same extent as the junior subordinated debt. The guarantee does not place a limitation on the amount of additional indebtedness that may be incurred by Huntington.

LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PARTNERSHIPS

Huntington makes certain equity investments in various limited partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital, to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings, and to assist in achieving goals associated with the Community Reinvestment Act. The primary activities of the limited partnerships include the identification, development, and operation of multi family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants. Generally, these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity.

Huntington is a limited partner in each Low Income Housing Tax Credit Partnership. A separate unrelated third party is the general partner. Each limited partnership is managed by the general partner, who exercises full and exclusive control over the affairs of the limited partnership. The general partner has all the rights, powers and authority granted or permitted to be granted to a general partner of a limited partnership under the Ohio Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. Duties entrusted to the general partner of each limited partnership include, but are not limited to: investment in operating companies, company expenditures, investment of excess funds, borrowing funds, employment of agents, disposition of fund property, prepayment and refinancing of liabilities, votes and consents, contract authority, disbursement of funds, accounting methods, tax elections, bank accounts, insurance, litigation, cash reserve, and use of working capital reserve funds. Except for limited rights granted to consent to certain transactions, the limited partner(s) may not participate in the operation, management, or control of the limited partnership’s business, transact any business in the limited partnership’s name or have any power to sign documents for or otherwise bind the limited partnership. In addition, the general partner may only be removed by the limited partner(s) in the event the general partner fails to comply with the terms of the agreement and/or is negligent in performing its duties.

Huntington believes the general partner of each limited partnership has the power to direct the activities which most significantly affect the performance of each partnership, therefore, Huntington has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any LIHTC partnership. Huntington uses the equity or effective yield method to account for its investments in these entities. These investments are included in accrued income and other assets. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Huntington had gross investment commitments of $493.4 million (net of amortization: $345.2 million) and $532.1 million (net of amortization: $391.9 million), respectively, of which $365.8 million and $380.0 million, respectively, were funded. The unfunded portion is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities.

135


Table of Contents

16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Commitments to extend credit

In the ordinary course of business, Huntington makes various commitments to extend credit that are not reflected in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The contractual amounts of these financial agreements at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, were as follows:

June 30, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Contract amount represents credit risk:

Commitments to extend credit

Commercial

$ 9,814,313 $ 9,209,094

Consumer

6,196,952 6,189,447

Commercial real estate

767,082 797,605

Standby letters-of-credit

457,662 514,705

Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates, are variable-rate, and contain clauses that permit Huntington to terminate or otherwise renegotiate the contracts in the event of a significant deterioration in the customer’s credit quality. These arrangements normally require the payment of a fee by the customer, the pricing of which is based on prevailing market conditions, credit quality, probability of funding, and other relevant factors. Since many of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contract amounts are not necessarily indicative of future cash requirements. The interest rate risk arising from these financial instruments is insignificant as a result of their predominantly short-term, variable-rate nature.

Standby letters-of-credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. Most of these arrangements mature within two years. The carrying amount of deferred revenue associated with these guarantees was $1.3 million and $1.4 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Through the Company’s credit process, Huntington monitors the credit risks of outstanding standby letters-of-credit. When it is probable that a standby letter-of-credit will be drawn and not repaid in full, losses are recognized in the provision for credit losses. At June 30, 2013, Huntington had $458 million of standby letters-of-credit outstanding, of which 81% were collateralized. Included in this $458 million total are letters-of-credit issued by the Bank that support securities that were issued by customers and remarketed by The Huntington Investment Company, the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary.

Huntington uses an internal grading system to assess an estimate of loss on its loan and lease portfolio. This same loan grading system is used to monitor credit risk associated with standby letters-of-credit. Under this grading system as of June 30, 2013, approximately $45 million of the standby letters-of-credit were rated strong with sufficient asset quality, liquidity, and good debt capacity and coverage; approximately $390 million were rated average with acceptable asset quality, liquidity, and modest debt capacity; and approximately $23 million were rated substandard with negative financial trends, structural weaknesses, operating difficulties, and higher leverage.

Commercial letters-of-credit represent short-term, self-liquidating instruments that facilitate customer trade transactions and generally have maturities of no longer than 90 days. The goods or cargo being traded normally secures these instruments.

Commitments to sell loans

Huntington enters into forward contracts relating to its mortgage banking business to hedge the exposures from commitments to make new residential mortgage loans with existing customers and from mortgage loans classified as loans held for sale. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Huntington had commitments to sell residential real estate loans of $745.4 million and $849.8 million, respectively. These contracts mature in less than one year.

Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, city, and foreign jurisdictions. Federal income tax audits have been completed through 2009. The Company has appealed certain proposed adjustments resulting from the IRS examination of the 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 tax returns. Management believes the tax positions taken related to such proposed adjustments were correct and supported by applicable statutes, regulations, and judicial authority, and intend to vigorously defend them. In 2011, Management entered into discussions with the Appeals Division of the IRS for the 2006 and 2007 tax returns. It is possible the ultimate resolution of the proposed adjustments, if unfavorable, may be material to the results of operations in the period it occurs. However, although no assurance can be given, Management believes the resolution of these examinations will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position. In the first quarter of 2013, the IRS began an examination of our 2010 and 2011 consolidated federal income tax returns. Various state and other jurisdictions remain open to examination for tax years 2006 and forward.

136


Table of Contents

Huntington accounts for uncertainties in income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. At June 30, 2013, Huntington had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $6.2 million in income tax liability related to uncertain tax positions. Total interest accrued on the unrecognized tax benefits was $0.4 million as of June 30, 2013. Huntington recognizes interest and penalties on income tax assessments or income tax refunds in the financial statements as a component of provision for income taxes. It is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could decrease in the next twelve months. Management estimates that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could decrease $5 to $6 million due to a change regarding the technical merits of certain tax positions taken.

Litigation

The nature of Huntington’s business ordinarily results in a certain amount of claims, litigation, investigations, and legal and administrative cases and proceedings, all of which are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. When the Company determines it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, it vigorously defends itself. The Company will consider settlement of cases when, in Management’s judgment, it is in the best interests of both the Company and its shareholders to do so.

On at least a quarterly basis, Huntington assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For matters where it is probable the Company will incur a loss and the amount can be reasonably estimated, Huntington establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is adjusted as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For matters where a loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.

In certain cases, exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual to the extent such loss is reasonably possible, but not probable. Management believes an estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of amounts accrued, for current legal proceedings is from $0 to approximately $130.0 million at June 30, 2013. For certain other cases, Management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss at this time. Any estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants in several of the current proceedings whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the numerous unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, Management’s estimate will change from time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate.

While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, Management believes that the amount it has already accrued is adequate and any incremental liability arising from the Company’s legal proceedings will not have a material negative adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position as a whole. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position in a particular period.

The following supplements the discussion of certain matters previously reported in Item 3 (Legal Proceedings) of the 2012 Form 10-K for events occurring through the date of this filing:

The Bank has been a defendant in three lawsuits, which collectively may be material, arising from its commercial lending, depository, and equipment leasing relationships with Cyberco Holdings, Inc. (Cyberco), based in Grand Rapids, Michigan. In November 2004, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the IRS raided the Cyberco facilities and Cyberco’s operations ceased. An equipment leasing fraud was uncovered, whereby Cyberco sought financing from equipment lessors and financial institutions, including the Bank, allegedly to purchase computer equipment from Teleservices Group, Inc. (Teleservices). Cyberco created fraudulent documentation to close the financing transactions while, in fact, no computer equipment was ever purchased or leased from Teleservices which proved to be a shell corporation.

On June 22, 2007, a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan (District Court) was filed by El Camino Resources, Ltd, ePlus Group, Inc., and Bank Midwest, N.A., all of whom had lending relationships with Cyberco, against the Bank, which alleged that Cyberco defrauded plaintiffs and converted plaintiffs’ property through various means in connection with the equipment leasing scheme and alleged that the Bank aided and abetted Cyberco in committing the alleged fraud and conversion. The complaint further alleged that the Bank’s actions entitle one of the plaintiffs to recover $1.9 million from the Bank as a form of unjust enrichment. In addition, plaintiffs claimed direct damages of approximately $32.0 million and additional consequential damages in excess of $20.0 million. On July 1, 2010, the District Court issued an Opinion and Order adopting in full a federal magistrate’s recommendation for summary judgment in favor of the Bank on all claims except the unjust enrichment claim, and a partial summary judgment was entered on July 1, 2010. On February 6, 2012, the District Court dismissed the remaining count for unjust enrichment following a finding by the bankruptcy court that the plaintiff must pursue its rights, if any, with respect to that count in a bankruptcy court. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on March 2, 2012, appealing the District Court’s judgment against them on the aiding and abetting and conversion claims. Oral arguments before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals were held January 24, 2013, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s judgment in an opinion issued on April 8, 2013. The plaintiffs then filed a motion for rehearing en banc, which the Sixth Circuit denied on May 30, 2013.

137


Table of Contents

The Bank is also involved with the Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings of both Cyberco, filed on December 9, 2004, and Teleservices, filed on January 21, 2005. The Cyberco bankruptcy trustee commenced an adversary proceeding against the Bank on December 8, 2006, seeking over $70.0 million he alleged was transferred to the Bank. The Bank responded with a motion to dismiss and all but the preference claims were dismissed on January 29, 2008. The Cyberco bankruptcy trustee alleged preferential transfers in the amount of approximately $1.2 million. The Bankruptcy Court ordered the case to be tried in July 2012, and entered a pretrial order governing all pretrial conduct. The Bank filed a motion for summary judgment based on the Cyberco trustee seeking recovery in connection with the same alleged transfers as the Teleservices trustee in the case described below. The Bankruptcy Court granted the motion in principal part and the parties stipulated to a full dismissal which was entered on June 19, 2012.

The Teleservices bankruptcy trustee filed an adversary proceeding against the Bank on January 19, 2007, seeking to avoid and recover alleged transfers that occurred in two ways: (1) checks made payable to the Bank to be applied to Cyberco’s indebtedness to the Bank, and (2) deposits into Cyberco’s bank accounts with the Bank. A trial was held as to only the Bank’s defenses. Subsequently, the trustee filed a summary judgment motion on her affirmative case, alleging the fraudulent transfers to the Bank totaled approximately $73.0 million and seeking judgment in that amount (which includes the $1.2 million alleged to be preferential transfers by the Cyberco bankruptcy trustee). On March 17, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Opinion determining the alleged transfers made to the Bank were not received in good faith from the time period of April 30, 2004, through November 2004, and that the Bank had failed to show a lack of knowledge of the avoidability of the alleged transfers from September 2003, through April 30, 2004. The trustee then filed an amended motion for summary judgment on her affirmative case and a hearing was held on July 1, 2011.

On March 30, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Opinion on the trustee’s motion determining the Bank was the initial transferee of the checks made payable to it and was a subsequent transferee of all deposits into Cyberco’s accounts. The Bankruptcy Court ruled Cyberco’s deposits were themselves transfers to the Bank under the Bankruptcy Code, and the Bank was liable for both the checks and the deposits, totaling approximately $73.0 million. The Bankruptcy Court ruled the Bank may be entitled to a credit of approximately $4.0 million for the Cyberco trustee’s recoveries in preference actions filed against third parties that received payments from Cyberco within 90 days preceding Cyberco’s bankruptcy. Lastly, the Bankruptcy Court ruled that it will award prejudgment interest to the Teleservices trustee at a rate to be determined. A trial was held on these remaining issues on April 30, 2012, and the Court gave a bench opinion on July 23, 2012. In that opinion, the Court denied the Bank the $4.0 million credit, but ruled approximately $0.9 million in deposits were either double-counted or were outside the timeframe in which the Teleservices trustee can recover. Therefore, the Bankruptcy Court’s recommended award will be reduced by this $0.9 million. Further, the Bankruptcy Court ruled the interest rate specified in the federal statute governing post-judgment interest, which is based on treasury bill rates, will be the rate of interest for determining prejudgment interest. The rulings of the Bankruptcy Court in its March 2011 and March 2012 opinions, as well as its July 23, 2012, bench opinion, will not be reduced to judgment by the Bankruptcy Court. Rather, the Bankruptcy Court has delivered a report and recommendation to the District Court for the Western District of Michigan, recommending a judgment be entered in the principal amount of $71.8 million, plus interest through July 27, 2012, in the amount of $8.8 million. The District Court is conducting a de novo review of the fact findings and legal conclusions in the Bankruptcy Court’s opinions.

In the pending bankruptcy cases of Cyberco and Teleservices, the Bank moved to substantively consolidate the two bankruptcy estates, principally on the ground that Teleservices was the alter ego and a mere instrumentality of Cyberco at all times. On July 2, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Opinion denying the Bank’s motions for substantive consolidation of the two bankruptcy estates. The Bank has appealed this ruling and the appeal is pending.

On January 17, 2012, the Company was named a defendant in a putative class action filed on behalf of all 88 counties in Ohio against MERSCORP, Inc. and numerous other financial institutions that participate in the mortgage electronic registration system (MERS). The complaint alleges that recording of mortgages and assignments thereof is mandatory under Ohio law and seeks a declaratory judgment that the defendants are required to record every mortgage and assignment on real property located in Ohio and pay the attendant statutory recording fees. The complaint also seeks damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. Although Huntington has not been named as a defendant in the other cases, similar litigation has been initiated against MERSCORP, Inc. and other financial institutions in other jurisdictions throughout the country.

138


Table of Contents

17. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The parent company condensed financial statements, which include transactions with subsidiaries, are as follows::

Balance Sheets

June 30, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 921,099 $ 921,471

Due from The Huntington National Bank

207,414

Due from non-bank subsidiaries

66,552 78,006

Investment in The Huntington National Bank

4,945,666 4,754,886

Investment in non-bank subsidiaries

795,060 774,055

Accrued interest receivable and other assets

158,151 131,358

Total assets

$ 6,886,528 $ 6,867,190

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Short-term borrowings

$ $

Long-term borrowings

643,277 662,894

Dividends payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities

459,736 414,085

Total liabilities

1,103,013 1,076,979

Shareholders’ equity (1)

5,783,515 5,790,211

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 6,886,528 $ 6,867,190

(1) See Huntington’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity.

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended

Statements of Income

June 30, June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Income

Dividends from

The Huntington National Bank

$ $ $ $

Non-bank subsidiaries

8,450

Interest from

The Huntington National Bank

936 10,703 5,087 23,589

Non-bank subsidiaries

796 1,592 1,618 3,225

Other

517 404 913 817

Total income

2,249 12,699 7,618 36,081

Expense

Personnel costs

14,797 10,488 28,210 20,201

Interest on borrowings

2,433 8,294 8,550 17,473

Other

9,803 7,269 14,867 14,848

Total expense

27,033 26,051 51,627 52,522

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

(24,784 ) (13,352 ) (44,009 ) (16,441 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

(6,164 ) (148 ) (14,016 ) (11,240 )

Income (loss) before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

(18,620 ) (13,204 ) (29,993 ) (5,201 )

Increase (decrease) in undistributed net income of:

The Huntington National Bank

163,401 158,536 319,037 300,960

Non-bank subsidiaries

5,870 7,374 13,387 10,217

Net income

$ 150,651 $ 152,706 $ 302,431 $ 305,976

Other comprehensive income (loss) (1)

(123,781 ) 21,839 (132,919 ) 37,786

Comprehensive income

$ 26,870 $ 174,545 $ 169,512 $ 343,762

(1) See Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for other comprehensive income (loss) detail.

139


Table of Contents
Six Months Ended

Statements of Cash Flows

June 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012

Operating activities

Net income

$ 302,431 $ 305,976

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

(340,189 ) (327,875 )

Depreciation and amortization

143 129

Other, net

47,556 83,764

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

9,941 61,994

Investing activities

Repayments from subsidiaries

227,987 233,648

Advances to subsidiaries

(2,150 ) (20,103 )

Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities

225,837 213,545

Financing activities

Payment of borrowings

(50,000 ) (85,475 )

Dividends paid on stock

(83,512 ) (84,869 )

Repurchases of common stock

(108,798 ) (40,230 )

Other, net

6,160 86

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

(236,150 ) (210,488 )

Change in cash and cash equivalents

(372 ) 65,051

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

921,471 917,954

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 921,099 $ 983,005

Supplemental disclosure:

Interest paid

$ 8,550 $ 17,473

18. SEGMENT REPORTING

We have four major business segments: Retail and Business Banking, Regional and Commercial Banking, Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate, and Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending. A Treasury / Other function includes our insurance business and other unallocated assets, liabilities, revenue, and expense.

Segment results are determined based upon the Company’s management reporting system, which assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each of the business segments. The process is designed around the Company’s organizational and management structure and, accordingly, the results derived are not necessarily comparable with similar information published by other financial institutions. A description of each segment and table of financial results is presented below.

Retail and Business Banking : The Retail and Business Banking segment provides a wide array of financial products and services to consumer and small business customers including but not limited to checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit, consumer loans, and small business loans and leases. Other financial services available to consumer and small business customers include investments, insurance services, interest rate risk protection products, foreign exchange hedging, and treasury management services. Huntington serves customers primarily through our network of traditional branches in Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Indiana, West Virginia, and Kentucky. Huntington also has branches located in grocery stores in Ohio and Michigan. In addition to our extensive branch network, customers can access Huntington through online banking, mobile banking, telephone banking, and over 1,400 ATMs.

Huntington established a “Fair Play” banking philosophy and built a reputation for meeting the banking needs of consumers in a manner which makes them feel supported and appreciated. Huntington believes customers are recognizing this and other efforts as key differentiators and it is earning us more customers and deeper relationships.

Business Banking is a dynamic and growing part of our business and we are committed to being the bank of choice for small businesses in our markets. Business Banking is defined as companies with revenues up to $25 million and consists of approximately 163,000 businesses. Huntington continues to develop products and services that are designed specifically to meet the needs of small business. Huntington continues to look for ways to help companies find solutions to their capital needs.

140


Table of Contents

Regional and Commercial Banking: This segment provides a wide array of products and services to the middle market and large corporate customers base located primarily within our eleven regional commercial banking markets. Products and services are delivered through a relationship banking model and include commercial lending, as well as depository and liquidity management products. Dedicated teams collaborate with our relationship bankers to deliver complex and customized treasury management solutions, equipment and technology leasing, international services, capital markets services such as interest rate risk protection products, foreign exchange hedging and sales, trading of securities, mezzanine investment capabilities, and employee benefit programs (insurance, 401(k)). The Commercial Banking team specializes in serving a number of industry segments such as not-for-profit organizations, health-care entities, and large publicly traded companies.

Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate : This segment provides lending and other banking products and services to customers outside of our normal retail and commercial banking segments. Our products and services include financing for the purchase of automobiles by customers at automotive dealerships, financing the acquisition of new and used vehicle inventory of automotive dealerships, and financing for land, buildings, and other commercial real estate owned or constructed by real estate developers, automobile dealerships, or other customers with real estate project financing needs. Products and services are delivered through highly specialized relationship-focused bankers and product partners. Huntington creates well-defined relationship plans which identify needs where solutions are developed and customer commitments are obtained.

The Automotive Finance team services automobile dealerships, its owners, and consumers buying automobiles through these dealerships. Huntington has provided new and used automobile financing and dealer services throughout the Midwest since the early 1950s. This consistency in the market and our focus on working with strong dealerships, has allowed us to expand into selected markets outside of the Midwest and to actively deepen relationships while building a strong reputation.

The Commercial Real Estate team serves real estate developers, REITs, and other customers with lending needs that are secured by commercial properties. Most of our customers are located within our footprint.

Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending: This segment consists of our wealth management, government banking, and home lending businesses. In wealth management, Huntington provides financial services to high net worth clients in our primary banking markets and Florida. Huntington provides these services through a unified sales team, which consists of private bankers, trust officers, and investment advisors. Aligned with the eleven regional commercial banking markets, this coordinated service model delivers products and services directly and through the other segment product partners. A fundamental point of differentiation is our commitment to be in the market, working closely with clients and their other advisors to identify needs, offer solutions and provide ongoing advice in an optimal client relationship.

The Government Finance Group provides financial products and services to government and other public sector entities in our primary banking markets. A locally based team of relationship managers works with clients to meet their trust, lending, and treasury management needs.

Home Lending originates and services consumer loans and mortgages for customers who are generally located in our primary banking markets. Consumer and mortgage lending products are primarily distributed through the Retail and Business Banking segment, as well as through commissioned loan originators. Closely aligned, our Community Development group serves an important role as it focuses on delivering on our commitment to the communities Huntington serves.

The segment also includes the related businesses of investment management, investment servicing, custody, corporate trust, and retirement plan services. Huntington Asset Advisors provides investment management services through a variety of internal and external channels, including advising the Huntington Funds, our proprietary family of mutual funds and Huntington Strategy Shares, our actively-managed exchange-traded funds. Huntington Asset Services offers administrative and operational support to fund complexes, including fund accounting, transfer agency, administration, and distribution services. Our retirement plan services business offers fully bundled and third party distribution of a variety of qualified and non-qualified plan solutions.

Treasury / Other function includes our insurance brokerage business, which specializes in commercial property and casualty, employee benefits, personal lines, life and disability and specialty lines of insurance. Huntington also provides brokerage and agency services for residential and commercial title insurance and excess and surplus product lines of insurance. As an agent and broker we do not assume underwriting risks; instead we provide our customers with quality, noninvestment insurance contracts. The Treasury / Other function also includes technology and operations, other unallocated assets, liabilities, revenue, and expense.

141


Table of Contents

Listed below is certain operating basis financial information reconciled to Huntington’s June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, reported results by business segment:

Three Months Ended June 30,
Retail & Regional &
Income Statements Business Commercial Treasury/ Huntington

(dollar amounts in thousands )

Banking Banking AFCRE WGH Other Consolidated

2013

Net interest income

$ 204,560 67,945 87,661 42,631 22,140 $ 424,937

Provision for credit losses

25,477 (387 ) (5,302 ) 4,933 1 24,722

Noninterest income

98,614 33,929 7,891 76,051 32,170 248,655

Noninterest expense

236,875 54,739 37,306 94,361 22,584 445,865

Income taxes

14,288 16,633 22,242 6,786 (7,595 ) 52,354

Net income

$ 26,534 $ 30,889 $ 41,306 $ 12,602 $ 39,320 $ 150,651

2012

Net interest income

$ 221,645 67,919 86,862 48,386 4,150 $ 428,962

Provision for credit losses

16,047 24,329 (4,828 ) 971 1 36,520

Noninterest income

97,739 35,470 10,299 80,593 29,718 253,819

Noninterest expense

240,385 51,691 38,526 94,022 19,645 444,269

Income taxes

22,033 9,579 22,212 11,895 (16,433 ) 49,286

Net income

$ 40,919 $ 17,790 $ 41,251 $ 22,091 $ 30,655 $ 152,706

Six Months Ended June 30,
Retail & Regional &
Income Statements Business Commercial Treasury/ Huntington

(dollar amounts in thousands )

Banking Banking AFCRE WGH Other Consolidated

2013

Net interest income

$ 409,809 137,344 175,731 86,299 39,924 $ 849,107

Provision for credit losses

58,017 (7,627 ) (12,802 ) 16,726 54,314

Noninterest income

184,578 64,231 16,246 170,705 65,104 500,864

Noninterest expense

477,044 107,154 74,217 186,353 43,890 888,658

Income taxes

20,764 35,717 45,697 18,874 (16,484 ) 104,568

Net income

$ 38,562 $ 66,331 $ 84,865 $ 35,051 $ 77,622 $ 302,431

2012

Net interest income

$ 442,946 132,121 177,192 95,215 (1,303 ) $ 846,171

Provision for credit losses

64,886 37,609 (47,082 ) 15,512 1 70,926

Noninterest income

186,995 67,403 45,018 168,231 71,492 539,139

Noninterest expense

475,246 97,558 77,365 184,939 71,837 906,945

Income taxes

31,433 22,525 67,174 22,048 (41,717 ) 101,463

Net income

$ 58,376 $ 41,832 $ 124,753 $ 40,947 $ 40,068 $ 305,976

Assets at Deposits at
June 30, December 31, June 30, December 31,

(dollar amounts in thousands)

2013 2012 2013 2012

Retail & Business Banking

$ 14,369,686 $ 14,362,630 $ 28,209,069 $ 28,367,264

Regional & Commercial Banking

11,884,929 11,540,966 5,639,029 5,862,858

AFCRE

12,533,086 12,085,128 1,021,396 995,035

WGH

7,683,464 7,570,256 10,069,230 9,507,785

Treasury / Other

9,642,522 10,594,205 1,392,710 1,519,741

Total

$ 56,113,687 $ 56,153,185 $ 46,331,434 $ 46,252,683

142


Table of Contents

19. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

On March 30, 2012, Huntington acquired the loans, deposits and certain other assets and liabilities of Fidelity Bank located in Dearborn, Michigan from the FDIC. Under the agreement, approximately $523.9 million of loans, a receivable of $95.9 million from the FDIC, and $152.3 million of other assets (primarily cash and due from banks and investment securities) were transferred to Huntington. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations”. The fair values for loans were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms (Level 3). This value was reduced by an estimate of probable losses and the credit risk associated with the loans. The fair values of deposits were estimated by discounting cash flows using interest rates currently being offered on deposits with similar maturities (Level 3). Additionally, approximately $713.4 million of deposits and $45.2 million of other borrowings were assumed. Huntington recognized an $11.2 million bargain purchase gain during 2012, which is included in other noninterest income.

143


Table of Contents

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures for the current period can be found in the Market Risk section of this report, which includes changes in market risk exposures from disclosures presented in Huntington’s 2012 Form 10-K.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Huntington maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Huntington’s Management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of Huntington’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon such evaluation, Huntington’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, Huntington’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There have not been any significant changes in Huntington’s internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Huntington’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

In accordance with the instructions to Part II, the other specified items in this part have been omitted because they are not applicable or the information has been previously reported.

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

Information required by this item is set forth in Note 16 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

Information required by this item is set forth in Part 1 Item 2- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) and (b)

Not Applicable

(c)

Period

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs (1)
Maximum Number of Shares (or
Approximate Dollar Value) that
May Yet Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs (2)

April 1, 2013 to April 30, 2013

2,031,755 $ 7.03 2,031,755 $ 212,721,695

May 1, 2013 to May 31, 2013

4,344,471 7.61 6,376,226 179,665,498

June 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013

3,619,498 7.64 9,995,724 152,002,102

Total

9,995,724 $ 7.50 9,995,724 $ 152,002,102

(1) The reported shares were repurchased pursuant to Huntington’s publicly announced stock repurchase authorizations.
(2) The number shown represents, as of the end of each period, the maximum number of shares (approximate dollar value) of Common Stock that may yet be purchased under publicly announced stock repurchase authorizations. The shares may be purchased, from time-to-time, depending on market conditions.

144


Table of Contents

On March 14, 2013, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated was notified by the Federal Reserve that it had no objection to Huntington’s proposed capital actions included in Huntington’s capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve in January of this year. These actions included the potential repurchase of up to $227 million shares of common stock, starting in the second quarter of 2013 through the first quarter of 2014. Huntington’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program consistent with Huntington’s capital plan. During the 2013 second quarter, Huntington repurchased a total of 10.0 million shares at a weighted average share price of $7.50.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Index

This report incorporates by reference the documents listed below that we have previously filed with the SEC. The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference information in this document. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this document, except for any information that is superseded by information that is included directly in this document.

This information may be read and copied at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The SEC also maintains an Internet web site that contains reports, proxy statements, and other information about issuers, like us, who file electronically with the SEC. The address of the site is http://www.sec.gov . The reports and other information filed by us with the SEC are also available at our Internet web site. The address of the site is http://www.huntington.com . Except as specifically incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, information on those web sites is not part of this report. You also should be able to inspect reports, proxy statements, and other information about us at the offices of the NASDAQ National Market at 33 Whitehall Street, New York, New York.

Exhibit
Number
Document Description

Report or Registration

Statement

SEC File or
Registration
Number
Exhibit
Reference
3.1 Articles of Restatement of Charter.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the year ended December 31, 1993.

000-02525 3 (i)
3.2 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Restatement of Charter.

Current Report on Form 8-K

dated May 31, 2007

000-02525 3.1
3.3 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Restatement of Charter.

Current Report on Form 8-K

dated May 7, 2008

000-02525 3.1
3.4 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Restatement of Charter.

Current Report on Form 8-K

dated April 27, 2010

001-34073 3.1
3.5 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of April 22, 2008.

Current Report on Form 8-K

dated April 22, 2008

000-02525 3.1
3.6 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of April 22. 2008.

Current Report on Form 8-K

dated April 22, 2008

000-02525 3.2
3.7 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of November 12, 2008.

Current Report on Form 8-K

dated November 12, 2008

001-34073 3.1
3.8 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of December 31, 2006.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the year ended December 31, 2006

000-02525 3.4
3.9 Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as of December 28, 2011.

Current Report on Form 8-K

dated December 28, 2011.

001-34073 3.1
3.10 Bylaws of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as amended and restated, as of July 18, 2012.

Current Report on Form 8-K

dated July 24, 2012.

001-34073 3.1
4.1 Instruments defining the Rights of Security Holders - reference is made to Articles Fifth, Eighth, and Tenth of Articles of Restatement of Charter, as amended and supplemented. Instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
10.1 Schedule identifying material details of Executive Agreements.
10.2 * Huntington Bancshares Incorporated Executive Agreement
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – Chief Executive Officer.
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – Chief Financial Officer.
32.1 Section 1350 Certification – Chief Executive Officer.
32.2 Section 1350 Certification – Chief Financial Officer.
101 ** The following material from Huntington’s Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (1) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (3) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (4) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (5) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (6) the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
** Furnished, not filed.

145


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

(Registrant)

Date: July 29, 2013

/s/ Stephen D. Steinour

Stephen D. Steinour
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: July 29, 2013

/s/ David S. Anderson

David S. Anderson
Interim Chief Financial Officer

146

TABLE OF CONTENTS