HBIA 10-Q Quarterly Report Sept. 30, 2013 | Alphaminr

HBIA 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013

HILLS BANCORPORATION
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 form10q.htm HILLS BANCORPORATION 10-Q 9-30-2013

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

Commission file number: 0-12668

Hills Bancorporation

Incorporated in Iowa
I.R.S. Employer Identification
No. 42-1208067

131 MAIN STREET, HILLS, IOWA 52235

Telephone number: (319) 679-2291

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

þ Yes o No

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).

þ Yes o No

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated Filer þ
Non-accelerated filer o
Small Reporting Company o

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o Yes þ No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

SHARES OUTSTANDING
CLASS
At October 31, 2013
Common Stock, no par value
4,726,245

HILLS BANCORPORATION
Index to Form 10-Q

Part I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page
Number
Item 1.
Financial Statements
3
4
5
6
7
9
Item 2.
36
Item 3.
53
Item 4.
53
Part II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
54
Item 1A.
54
Item 2.
54
Item 3.
54
Item 4.
54
Item 5.
54
Item 6.
55
56
57
Page 2

HILLS BANCORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Amounts In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
ASSETS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
December 31, 2012
Cash and cash equivalents
$
56,923
$
63,582
Investment securities available for sale at fair value (amortized cost September 30, 2013 $225,527; December 31, 2012 $219,777)
227,679
226,182
Stock of Federal Home Loan Bank
7,580
8,062
Loans held for sale
2,811
28,256
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses (September 30, 2013 $24,750; December 31, 2012 $25,160)
1,767,603
1,697,002
Property and equipment, net
29,876
30,624
Tax credit real estate
18,267
18,745
Accrued interest receivable
8,460
7,851
Deferred income taxes, net
8,874
7,144
Other real estate
588
746
Goodwill
2,500
2,500
Prepaid FDIC insurance
-
2,957
Other assets
2,979
6,069
Total Assets
$
2,134,140
$
2,099,720
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits
$
250,226
$
273,973
Interest-bearing deposits
1,443,079
1,388,571
Total deposits
$
1,693,305
$
1,662,544
Short-term borrowings
29,163
38,783
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
125,000
125,000
Accrued interest payable
1,092
1,361
Other liabilities
18,337
16,121
Total Liabilities
$
1,866,897
$
1,843,809
Redeemable Common Stock Held by Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
$
28,140
$
30,715
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, no par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued September 30, 2013 - 5,071,780 shares; December 31, 2012 - 5,064,383 shares
$
-
$
-
Paid in capital
42,013
42,241
Retained earnings
244,787
229,625
Accumulated other comprehensive income
1,329
3,955
Unearned ESOP shares
(1,513
)
(1,513
)
Treasury stock at cost (September 30, 2013 - 341,666 shares; December 31, 2012 - 328,065 shares)
(19,373
)
(18,397
)
Total Stockholders' Equity
$
267,243
$
255,911
Less maximum cash obligation related to ESOP shares
28,140
30,715
Total Stockholders' Equity Less Maximum Cash Obligations Related to ESOP Shares
$
239,103
$
225,196
Total Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity
$
2,134,140
$
2,099,720
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 3

HILLS BANCORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited) (Amounts In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Interest income:
Loans, including fees
$
20,104
$
20,907
$
60,000
$
63,291
Investment securities:
Taxable
303
460
957
1,535
Nontaxable
823
857
2,497
2,544
Federal funds sold
11
32
57
90
Total interest income
$
21,241
$
22,256
$
63,511
$
67,460
Interest expense:
Deposits
$
2,684
$
3,396
$
8,488
$
10,493
Short-term borrowings
41
61
102
156
FHLB borrowings
1,409
1,983
4,181
5,963
Total interest expense
$
4,134
$
5,440
$
12,771
$
16,612
Net interest income
$
17,107
$
16,816
$
50,740
$
50,848
Provision for loan losses
112
(608
)
(309
)
(2,900
)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
$
16,995
$
17,424
$
51,049
$
53,748
Noninterest income:
Net gain on sale of loans
$
531
$
1,023
$
1,793
$
2,589
Trust fees
1,185
1,160
3,740
3,450
Service charges and fees
2,022
1,970
5,969
5,802
Rental revenue on tax credit real estate
398
397
1,114
1,189
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets
18
163
168
604
Other noninterest income
591
608
1,939
1,880
$
4,745
$
5,321
$
14,723
$
15,514
Noninterest expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits
$
6,158
$
5,782
$
18,312
$
17,725
Occupancy
907
773
2,780
2,469
Furniture and equipment
1,183
1,183
3,650
3,477
Office supplies and postage
445
427
1,222
1,145
Advertising and business development
624
608
1,895
1,705
Outside services
1,819
1,689
5,378
5,026
Rental expenses on tax credit real estate
614
560
1,571
1,774
FDIC insurance assessment
229
259
760
784
Loss on extinguishment of debt - Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
-
3,544
-
3,544
Other noninterest expense
432
447
1,298
1,382
$
12,411
$
15,272
$
36,866
$
39,031
Income before income taxes
$
9,329
$
7,473
$
28,906
$
30,231
Income taxes
2,705
1,971
8,558
8,759
Net income
$
6,624
$
5,502
$
20,348
$
21,472
Earnings per share:
Basic
$
1.41
$
1.16
$
4.32
$
4.52
Diluted
$
1.40
$
1.16
$
4.31
$
4.51
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 4

HILLS BANCORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited) (Amounts In Thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Net income
$
6,624
$
5,502
$
20,348
$
21,472
Other comprehensive (loss) income before tax:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period
(1,084
)
152
(4,236
)
(876
)
Less:  reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income
-
-
(17
)
(6
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax:
$
(1,084
)
$
152
$
(4,253
)
$
(882
)
Tax benefit (expense) related to other comprehensive loss
414
(58
)
1,627
337
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
$
(670
)
$
94
$
(2,626
)
$
(545
)
Comprehensive income
$
5,954
$
5,596
$
17,722
$
20,927

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 5

HILLS BANCORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited) (Amounts In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
Paid In Capital
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Unearned ESOP
Shares
Treasury Stock
Maximum Cash
Obligation Related
To ESOP Shares
Total
Balance, December 31, 2011
$
41,467
$
207,790
$
4,974
$
(2,017
)
$
(15,959
)
$
(27,826
)
$
208,429
Issuance of 8,797 shares of common stock
488
-
-
-
-
-
488
Forfeiture of 718 shares of common stock
(41
)
-
-
-
-
-
(41
)
Share-based compensation
13
-
-
-
-
-
13
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation
38
-
-
-
-
-
38
Change related to ESOP shares
-
-
-
-
-
(1,772
)
(1,772
)
Net income
-
21,472
-
-
-
-
21,472
Cash dividends ($1.05 per share)
-
(4,998
)
-
-
-
-
(4,998
)
Purchase of 25,990 shares of common stock
-
-
-
-
(1,739
)
-
(1,739
)
Other comprehensive loss
-
-
(545
)
-
-
-
(545
)
Balance, September 30, 2012
$
41,965
$
224,264
$
4,429
$
(2,017
)
$
(17,698
)
$
(29,598
)
$
221,345
Balance, December 31, 2012
$
42,241
$
229,625
$
3,955
$
(1,513
)
$
(18,397
)
$
(30,715
)
$
225,196
Issuance of 6,180 shares of common stock
240
-
-
-
-
-
240
Issuance of 1,592 shares of common stock   under the employee stock purchase plan
111
-
-
-
-
-
111
Unearned restricted stock compensation
(660
)
-
-
-
-
-
(660
)
Forfeiture of 375 shares of common stock
(25
)
-
-
-
-
-
(25
)
Share-based compensation
21
-
-
-
-
-
21
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation
85
-
-
-
-
-
85
Change related to ESOP shares
-
-
-
-
-
2,575
2,575
Net income
-
20,348
-
-
-
-
20,348
Cash dividends ($1.10 per share)
-
(5,186
)
-
-
-
-
(5,186
)
Purchase of 13,601 shares of common stock
-
-
-
-
(976
)
-
(976
)
Other comprehensive loss
-
-
(2,626
)
-
-
-
(2,626
)
Balance, September 30, 2013
$
42,013
$
244,787
$
1,329
$
(1,513
)
$
(19,373
)
$
(28,140
)
$
239,103

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 6

HILLS BANCORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (Amounts In Thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income
$
20,348
$
21,472
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities:
Depreciation
2,176
2,149
Provision for loan losses
(309
)
(2,900
)
Net gain on sale of investment securities
(17
)
(6
)
Share-based compensation
21
13
Forfeiture of common stock
(25
)
(41
)
Compensation expensed through issuance of common stock
176
400
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
(85
)
(38
)
Provision for deferred income taxes
(103
)
1,529
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets
(168
)
(604
)
Increase in accrued interest receivable
(609
)
(425
)
Amortization of discount on investment securities, net
834
747
Decrease in prepaid FDIC insurance
2,957
694
Decrease (increase) in other assets
3,175
(827
)
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities
1,287
81
Loans originated for sale
(178,872
)
(235,155
)
Proceeds on sales of loans
206,110
246,356
Net gain on sales of loans
(1,793
)
(2,589
)
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities
$
55,103
$
30,856
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale
$
21,070
$
43,126
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale
566
246
Purchases of investment securities available for sale
(27,721
)
(51,634
)
Loans made to customers, net of collections
(71,241
)
(45
)
Proceeds on sale of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets
1,275
2,476
Purchases of property and equipment
(1,428
)
(2,756
)
Income from tax credit real estate, net
478
937
Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities
$
(77,001
)
$
(7,650
)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits
$
30,761
$
81,674
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
(9,620
)
(7,709
)
Stock options exercised
175
88
Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation
85
38
Payments on FHLB borrowings
-
(40,000
)
Purchase of treasury stock
(976
)
(1,739
)
Dividends paid
(5,186
)
(4,998
)
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities
$
15,239
$
27,354

(Continued)
Page 7

HILLS BANCORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (Continued) (Amounts In Thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
$
(6,659
)
$
50,560
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of year
63,582
29,291
End of period
$
56,923
$
79,851
Supplemental Disclosures
Cash payments for:
Interest paid to depositors
$
8,757
$
10,681
Interest paid on other obligations
4,283
6,119
Income taxes paid
6,800
8,208
Noncash activities:
(Decrease) increase in maximum cash obligation related to ESOP shares
$
(2,575
)
$
1,772
Transfers to other real estate owned
949
1,666

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 8

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial reporting and with instructions for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X.  These financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which in the opinion of management are considered necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods shown.  Certain prior year amounts may be reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.  The Company considers that it operates as one business segment, a commercial bank.

The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2012, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date.  Operating results for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company's annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2013.

The Company evaluated subsequent events through the filing date of its quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the SEC.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards:

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset, other than goodwill, is impaired.   Under the new standard, if an entity concludes, based on an evaluation of all relevant qualitative factors, that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, it will not be required to perform the quantitative impairment test for that asset.  The standard is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted.  The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income.  The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, and the amendments should be prospectively applied.  The amendments do not change the current requirement for reporting net income or other comprehensive income.  The amendments require an organization to present on the face of the financial statements or in the footnotes the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income if the item reclassified is required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period.  Additionally, for other amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required to provide additional detail about those amounts.  The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Page 9

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 2. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of actual common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur from the exercise of common stock options outstanding.  ESOP shares are considered outstanding for this calculation unless unearned.

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods presented is as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
2013
2012
Common shares outstanding at the beginning of the period
4,708,910
4,746,393
4,712,328
4,759,818
Weighted average number of net shares redeemed
(720
)
(4,818
)
(364
)
(9,203
)
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)
4,708,190
4,741,575
4,711,964
4,750,615
Weighted average of potential dilutive shares attributable to stock options granted, computed under the treasury stock method
3,220
6,777
3,755
6,954
Weighted average number of shares (diluted)
4,711,410
4,748,352
4,715,719
4,757,569
Net income (In thousands)
$
6,624
$
5,502
$
20,348
$
21,472
Earnings per share:
Basic
$
1.41
$
1.16
$
4.32
$
4.52
Diluted
$
1.40
$
1.16
$
4.31
$
4.51

Page 10

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 3. Other Comprehensive Income

The following table summarizes the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Unrealized Gains
on Securities
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Unrealized Gains
on Securities
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Balance at the beginning of the period
$
659
$
659
$
3,955
$
3,955
Current period, other comprehensive income (loss)
670
670
(2,626
)
(2,626
)
Balance September 30, 2013
$
1,329
$
1,329
$
1,329
$
1,329

Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Unrealized Gains
on Securities
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Unrealized Gains
on Securities
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Balance at the beginning of the period
$
4,335
$
4,335
$
4,974
$
4,974
Current period, other comprehensive income (loss)
94
94
(545
)
(545
)
Balance September 30, 2012
$
4,429
$
4,429
$
4,429
$
4,429
Page 11

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 4. Securities

The carrying values of investment securities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Securities available for sale
State and political subdivisions
$
135,056
59.32
%
$
134,332
59.39
%
Other securities (FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA)
92,623
40.68
91,850
40.61
Total securities available for sale
$
227,679
100.00
%
$
226,182
100.00
%

Investment securities have been classified in the consolidated balance sheets according to management’s intent.  Available-for-sale securities consist of debt securities not classified as trading or held to maturity.  Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related deferred tax effect, are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity.  There were no trading or held to maturity securities as of September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012. The carrying amount of available-for-sale securities and their approximate fair values were as follows as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

Amortized Cost
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Gross Unrealized
(Losses)
Estimated Fair Value
September 30, 2013:
State and political subdivisions
$
133,288
$
3,182
$
(1,414
)
$
135,056
Other securities (FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA)
92,239
477
(93
)
92,623
Total
$
225,527
$
3,659
$
(1,507
)
$
227,679
December 31, 2012:
State and political subdivisions
$
128,848
$
5,593
$
(109
)
$
134,332
Other securities (FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA)
90,929
946
(25
)
91,850
Total
$
219,777
$
6,539
$
(134
)
$
226,182
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities classified according to their contractual maturities at September 30, 2013, were as follows (in thousands):
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
$
45,053
$
45,344
Due after one year through five years
108,733
111,048
Due after five years through ten years
71,641
71,190
Due over ten years
100
97
Total
$
225,527
$
227,679
As of September 30, 2013 investment securities with a carrying value of $29.16 million were pledged to collateralize short-term borrowings.

Page 12

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 4. Securities (continued)

The following table shows the fair value, gross unrealized losses and the percentage of fair value represented by gross unrealized losses of applicable investment securities owned by the Company, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Total
September 30, 2013
Unrealized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Description of Securities
#
Fair Value
Loss
%
#
Fair Value
Loss
%
#
Fair Value
Loss
%
State and political subdivisions
163
$
37,949
$
(1,381
)
3.64
%
10
$
2,080
$
(33
)
1.59
%
173
$
40,029
$
(1,414
)
3.53
%
Other securities (FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA)
6
16,647
(93
)
0.56
%
-
-
-
-
6
16,647
(93
)
0.56
%
Total temporarily impaired securities
169
$
54,596
$
(1,474
)
2.70
%
10
$
2,080
$
(33
)
1.59
%
179
$
56,676
$
(1,507
)
2.66
%

Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Total
December 31, 2012
Unrealized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Description of Securities
#
Fair Value
Loss
%
#
Fair Value
Loss
%
#
Fair Value
Loss
%
State and political subdivisions
37
$
7,854
$
(92
)
1.17
%
2
$
483
$
(17
)
3.52
%
39
$
8,337
$
(109
)
1.31
%
Other securities (FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA)
5
12,865
(25
)
0.19
%
-
-
-
-
5
12,865
(25
)
0.19
%
Total temporarily impaired securities
42
$
20,719
$
(117
)
0.56
%
2
$
483
$
(17
)
3.52
%
44
$
21,202
$
(134
)
0.63
%
The Company considered the following information in reaching the conclusion that the impairments disclosed in the table above are temporary and not other-than-temporary impairments.  Two of the ten state and political subdivision securities with gross unrealized losses greater than twelve months as of September 30, 2013 are municipal bonds which are rated Ba2.  Bonds with a Ba2 rating are less than investment grade.   The aggregate fair value of these Ba2 rated bonds is $0.49 million while their amortized cost is $0.50 million, representing an unrealized loss of $0.01 million.  None of the unrealized losses in the above table were due to the deterioration in the credit quality of any of the issues that might result in the non-collection of contractual principal and interest.  The unrealized losses are due to changes in interest rates.  The Company has not recognized any unrealized loss in income because management does not have the intent to sell the securities included in the previous table.  Management has concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis.
Page 13

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans

Classes of loans are as follows:

September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
(Amounts In Thousands)
Agricultural
$
82,740
$
76,190
Commercial and financial
166,175
148,034
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
31,852
25,788
Construction, land development and commercial
67,302
79,097
Mortgage, farmland
131,105
113,841
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
596,838
583,567
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
103,278
104,278
Mortgage, multi-family
239,795
214,812
Mortgage, commercial
310,847
312,506
Loans to individuals
19,034
20,350
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
42,761
43,102
$
1,791,727
$
1,721,565
Net unamortized fees and costs
626
597
$
1,792,353
$
1,722,162
Less allowance for loan losses
24,750
25,160
$
1,767,603
$
1,697,002

The Bank primarily makes loans in the Bank’s market area.  The Bank’s market area includes the counties of Johnson, Linn and Washington as well as the contiguous counties of Benton, Buchanan, Cedar, Delaware, Henry, Iowa, Jefferson, Jones, Keokuk, Louisa, and Muscatine.  Out of market area financing is limited and according to the Bank’s loan policy is subject to additional preapproval requirements.

Agricultural loans include loans made to finance agricultural production and other loans to farmers and farming operations.  Agricultural loans, most of which are secured by crops and machinery, are provided to finance capital improvement and farm operations as well as acquisitions of livestock and machinery.  The ability of the borrower to repay may be affected by many factors outside of the borrower’s control including adverse weather conditions, loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agricultural products and the impact of government regulations.  The ultimate repayment of agricultural loans is dependent upon the profitable operation or management of the agricultural entity.  Agricultural loans generally have a term of one year and may have a fixed or variable rate.

Page 14

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

The Bank’s commercial and financial loans include loans to contractors, retailers and other businesses.  The Bank provides a wide range of business loans, including lines of credit for working capital and operational purposes and term loans for the acquisition of equipment.  Although most loans are made on a secured basis, loans may be made on an unsecured basis where warranted by the overall financial condition of the borrower.  Terms of commercial and financial loans generally range from one to five years.  Interest rates for commercial loans can be fixed or variable.  The Bank’s commercial and financial loans are primarily made based on the reported cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower.  The collateral support provided by the borrower for most of these loans and the probability of repayment is based on the liquidation of the pledged collateral and enforcement of personal guarantees, if applicable.  The primary repayment risks of commercial loans are that the cash flows of the borrower may be unpredictable, and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value.

The Bank offers loans both to individuals that are constructing personal residences and to real estate developers and building contractors for the acquisition of land for development and the construction of homes and commercial properties.  Construction loans generally have a term of one year or less, with interest payable at maturity.  Interest rate arrangements are variable for construction projects.  Generally, collateral for construction loans is the underlying construction project.

Loans for farmland are made to individuals and businesses. The primary source of repayment is the cash flow generated by the collateral underlying the loan.  The secondary repayment source would be the liquidation of the collateral.  Terms for real estate loans secured by farmland range from one to five years with an amortization period of 25 years or less.  Generally, interest rates are fixed for mortgage loans secured by farmland.

Residential real estate loans include first and junior liens on 1 to 4 family residences.  The Bank sells certain mortgage loans to third parties on the secondary market.  For the loans sold on the secondary market the Bank does not retain any percentage of ownership or servicing rights.  Interest rates for residential real estate mortgages are determined by competitive pricing factors on the secondary market and within the Bank’s market area.  Collateral for residential real estate mortgages is generally the underlying property.  Generally, repayment of these loans is from monthly principal and interest payments from the borrower’s personal cash flows and liquidity, and collateral values are a function of residential real estate values in the markets that the Bank serves.

Multi-family real estate loans are primarily secured by properties such as apartment complexes.  The primary source of repayment is the cash flow generated by the collateral underlying the loan.  The secondary repayment source would be the liquidation of the collateral.  Terms for commercial real estate loans range from one to five years with an amortization period of 25 years or less.  Generally, interest rates for multi-family loans are fixed for the loan term.

The Bank originates loans for commercial properties to individuals and businesses.  The primary source of repayment is the cash flow generated by the collateral underlying the loan.  The secondary repayment source would be the liquidation of the collateral.  Terms for commercial real estate loans range from one to five years with an amortization period of 25 years or less.  The Bank offers both fixed and variable rate loans for commercial real estate.

The Bank offers loans to individuals including personal loans and automobile loans.  These consumer loans typically have shorter terms and lower balances.

Obligations to State and Political Subdivisions include only tax-exempt loans.
Page 15

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

Changes in the allowance for loan losses, the allowance for loan losses applicable to impaired loans and the related loan balance of impaired loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were as follows:

Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
Agricultural
Commercial and Financial
Real Estate:
Construction and
land development
Real Estate:
Mortgage,
farmland
Real Estate:
Mortgage, 1 to 4
family
Real Estate:
Mortgage, multi-
family and
commercial
Other
Total
(Amounts In Thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$
2,379
$
4,878
$
2,988
$
2,150
$
6,984
$
4,370
$
651
$
24,400
Charge-offs
-
(283
)
-
-
(103
)
(44
)
(19
)
(449
)
Recoveries
12
220
76
-
85
258
36
687
Provision
150
58
(258
)
139
105
(12
)
(70
)
112
Ending balance
$
2,541
$
4,873
$
2,806
$
2,289
$
7,071
$
4,572
$
598
$
24,750

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Agricultural
Commercial and Financial
Real Estate: Construction and
land development
Real Estate:
Mortgage,
farmland
Real Estate:
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family
Real Estate:
Mortgage, multi-family and
commercial
Other
Total
(Amounts In Thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$
1,653
$
4,573
$
3,175
$
1,746
$
8,088
$
5,104
$
821
$
25,160
Charge-offs
-
(778
)
(220
)
-
(651
)
(327
)
(143
)
(2,119
)
Recoveries
30
772
242
-
434
414
126
2,018
Provision
858
306
(391
)
543
(800
)
(619
)
(206
)
(309
)
Ending balance
$
2,541
$
4,873
$
2,806
$
2,289
$
7,071
$
4,572
$
598
$
24,750
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment
$
3
$
13
$
-
$
4
$
69
$
218
$
1
$
308
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment
$
2,538
$
4,860
$
2,806
$
2,285
$
7,002
$
4,354
$
597
$
24,442
Loans:
Ending balance
$
82,740
$
166,175
$
99,154
$
131,105
$
700,116
$
550,642
$
61,795
$
1,791,727
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment
123
1,868
1,722
459
4,519
17,912
12
26,615
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment
$
82,617
$
164,307
$
97,432
$
130,646
$
695,597
$
532,730
$
61,783
$
1,765,112
Page 16

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were as follows:

Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
Agricultural
Commercial and Financial
Real Estate:
Construction and
land development
Real Estate:
Mortgage,
farmland
Real Estate:
Mortgage, 1 to 4
family
Real Estate:
Mortgage, multi-
family and
commercial
Other
Total
(Amounts In Thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$
1,607
$
5,203
$
4,104
$
1,687
$
8,271
$
5,171
$
627
$
26,670
Charge-offs
-
(162
)
(88
)
-
(378
)
(3
)
(46
)
(677
)
Recoveries
10
461
8
-
155
99
52
785
Provision
287
(818
)
8
(36
)
89
(186
)
48
(608
)
Ending balance
$
1,904
$
4,684
$
4,032
$
1,651
$
8,137
$
5,081
$
681
$
26,170

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Agricultural
Commercial and Financial
Real Estate: Construction and
land development
Real Estate:
Mortgage,
farmland
Real Estate:
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family
Real Estate:
Mortgage, multi-family and
commercial
Other
Total
(Amounts In Thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$
1,354
$
6,429
$
4,994
$
1,411
$
9,051
$
6,150
$
761
$
30,150
Charge-offs
-
(991
)
(689
)
-
(1,113
)
(214
)
(136
)
(3,143
)
Recoveries
43
1,156
15
-
409
225
215
2,063
Provision
507
(1,910
)
(288
)
240
(210
)
(1,080
)
(159
)
(2,900
)
Ending balance
$
1,904
$
4,684
$
4,032
$
1,651
$
8,137
$
5,081
$
681
$
26,170
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment
$
3
$
24
$
41
$
-
$
66
$
82
$
-
$
216
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment
$
1,901
$
4,660
$
3,991
$
1,651
$
8,071
$
4,999
$
681
$
25,954
Loans:
Ending balance
$
68,769
$
142,888
$
106,738
$
102,457
$
689,835
$
526,427
$
52,251
$
1,689,365
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment
$
14
$
3,012
$
2,136
$
810
$
3,122
$
19,921
$
-
$
29,015
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment
$
68,755
$
139,876
$
104,602
$
101,647
$
686,713
$
506,506
$
52,251
$
1,660,350
Page 17

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

The following table presents the credit quality indicators by type of loans in each category as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (amounts in thousands):

Agricultural
Commercial and
Financial
Real Estate:
Construction, 1 to 4
family residential
Real Estate:
Construction, land
development and
commercial
September 30, 2013
Grade:
Pass
$
71,917
$
134,059
$
27,396
$
56,994
Potential Watch
3,438
11,036
1,384
4,774
Watch
1,550
15,383
2,760
3,858
Substandard
5,835
5,697
312
1,676
Total
$
82,740
$
166,175
$
31,852
$
67,302

Real Estate:
Mortgage,
farmland
Real Estate:
Mortgage, 1 to 4
family first liens
Real Estate: Mortgage,
1 to 4 family junior
liens
Real Estate:
Mortgage, multi-
family
September 30, 2013
Grade:
Pass
$
122,593
$
524,283
$
95,965
$
197,317
Potential Watch
4,553
27,236
1,639
17,376
Watch
1,570
25,295
3,719
24,281
Substandard
2,389
20,024
1,955
821
Total
$
131,105
$
596,838
$
103,278
$
239,795

Real Estate:
Mortgage,
commercial
Loans to
individuals
Obligations of
state and
political subdivisions
Total
September 30, 2013
Grade:
Pass
$
264,347
$
18,500
$
40,630
$
1,554,001
Potential Watch
22,432
112
1,072
95,052
Watch
14,810
292
1,059
94,577
Substandard
9,258
130
-
48,097
Total
$
310,847
$
19,034
$
42,761
$
1,791,727
Page 18

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)
Agricultural
Commercial and
Financial
Real Estate:
Construction, 1 to 4
family residential
Real Estate:
Construction, land
development and
commercial
December 31, 2012
Grade:
Pass
$
70,821
$
123,005
$
20,698
$
67,011
Potential Watch
1,169
7,996
2,232
4,636
Watch
1,376
10,927
1,826
3,855
Substandard
2,824
6,106
1,032
3,595
Total
$
76,190
$
148,034
$
25,788
$
79,097

Real Estate:
Mortgage,
farmland
Real Estate:
Mortgage, 1 to 4
family first liens
Real Estate: Mortgage,
1 to 4 family junior
liens
Real Estate:
Mortgage, multi-
family
December 31, 2012
Grade:
Pass
$
106,041
$
517,684
$
94,219
$
173,348
Potential Watch
2,434
24,240
3,839
11,098
Watch
1,863
21,266
3,584
27,936
Substandard
3,503
20,377
2,636
2,430
Total
$
113,841
$
583,567
$
104,278
$
214,812

Real Estate:
Mortgage,
commercial
Loans to
individuals
Obligations of
state and
political subdivisions
Total
December 31, 2012
Grade:
Pass
$
267,883
$
19,763
$
42,022
$
1,502,495
Potential Watch
11,687
118
-
69,449
Watch
24,890
318
1,080
98,921
Substandard
8,046
151
-
50,700
Total
$
312,506
$
20,350
$
43,102
$
1,721,565

The below are descriptions of the credit quality indicators:

Pass – Pass rated loans are supported by sound payment capacity, are adequately collateralized and have no apparent weaknesses that would affect the full repayment of the loan under the established terms and conditions.

Potential Watch – Potential watch rated loans are supported by adequate payment capacity, are adequately collateralized and are performing according to the established terms and conditions.  However, the loan requires more than average monitoring due to a potential weakness.  The potential watch indicator assists the Company in identifying and monitoring loans for which credit quality could deteriorate.
Page 19

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

Watch – Watch rated loans are supported by a marginal payment capacity and may be marginally collateralized.  There are identified weaknesses that if not monitored and corrected may adversely affect the Company’s credit position.  A watch credit would typically have a weakness in one of the general categories (cash flow, collateral position or payment history) but not in all categories.

Substandard – Substandard loans are not adequately supported by the paying capacity of the borrower and may be inadequately collateralized.  These loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses.  For these loans, it is more probable than not that the Company could sustain some loss if the deficiency(ies) is not corrected.

Past due loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

90 Days
Total
Accruing Loans
30 - 59 Days
60 - 89 Days
or More
Total Past
Loans
Past Due 90
Past Due
Past Due
Past Due
Due
Current
Receivable
Days or More
(Amounts In Thousands)
September 30, 2013
Agricultural
$
492
$
-
$
-
$
492
$
82,248
$
82,740
$
-
Commercial and financial
871
492
13
1,376
164,799
166,175
13
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
-
859
-
859
30,993
31,852
-
Construction, land development and commercial
144
385
823
1,352
65,950
67,302
91
Mortgage, farmland
-
60
171
231
130,874
131,105
171
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
596
1,399
2,144
4,139
592,699
596,838
1,127
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
355
264
95
714
102,564
103,278
66
Mortgage, multi-family
846
-
68
914
238,881
239,795
-
Mortgage, commercial
2,817
302
509
3,628
307,219
310,847
14
Loans to individuals
27
13
12
52
18,982
19,034
12
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
-
-
-
-
42,761
42,761
-
$
6,148
$
3,774
$
3,835
$
13,757
$
1,777,970
$
1,791,727
$
1,494
December 31, 2012:
Agricultural
$
374
$
-
$
-
$
374
$
75,816
$
76,190
$
-
Commercial and financial
712
100
100
912
147,122
148,034
10
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
-
-
-
-
25,788
25,788
-
Construction, land development and commercial
909
15
-
924
78,173
79,097
-
Mortgage, farmland
-
-
512
512
113,329
113,841
-
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
5,433
1,579
2,033
9,045
574,522
583,567
1,592
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
640
43
221
904
103,374
104,278
221
Mortgage, multi-family
840
-
845
1,685
213,127
214,812
592
Mortgage, commercial
2,060
-
1,415
3,475
309,031
312,506
228
Loans to individuals
22
-
-
22
20,328
20,350
-
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
-
-
-
-
43,102
43,102
-
$
10,990
$
1,737
$
5,126
$
17,853
$
1,703,712
$
1,721,565
$
2,643
The Company does not have a significant amount of loans that are past due less than 90 days where there are serious doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the loan repayment terms.
Page 20

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

Certain impaired loan information by loan type at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, was as follows:

September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Non-accrual
loans
Accruing loans
past due 90 days
or more (1)
TDR loans (2)
Non-
accrual
loans
Accruing loans
past due 90 days
or more (1)
TDR loans (2)
(Amounts In Thousands)
(Amounts In Thousands)
Agricultural
$
-
$
-
$
122
$
-
$
-
$
-
Commercial and financial
108
13
1,748
265
10
1,824
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
-
-
-
714
-
-
Construction, land development and commercial
1,572
91
58
2,169
-
95
Mortgage, farmland
-
171
288
512
-
294
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
1,909
1,127
1,295
580
1,592
1,065
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
199
66
-
17
221
90
Mortgage, multi-family
476
-
5,643
2,027
592
5,739
Mortgage, commercial
1,804
14
9,899
1,401
228
10,323
Loans to individuals
-
12
-
-
-
-
$
6,068
$
1,494
$
19,053
$
7,685
$
2,643
$
19,430
(1) There were $0.09 million TDR loans included within accruing loans past due 90 days or more as of September 30, 2013.  There were no TDR loans included within accruing loans past due 90 days or more as of December 31, 2012.
(2) Total TDR loans were $20.68 million and $22.13 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  Included in the total nonaccrual loans were $1.54 million and $2.69 million of TDR loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Loans 90 days or more past due that are still accruing interest decreased $1.15 million from December 31, 2012 to September 30, 2013. The average accruing loans past due 90 days or more balance was $62,000 as of September 30, 2013 and $110,000 as of December 31, 2012.  The accruing loans past due 90 days or more balances are believed to be adequately collateralized and the Company expects to collect all principal and interest as contractually due under these loans.
Page 21

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

The Company may modify the terms of a loan to maximize the collection of amounts due.  Such a modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”).  In most cases, the modification is either a reduction in interest rate, conversion to interest only payments or an extension of the maturity date.  The borrower is experiencing financial difficulties or is expected to experience difficulties in the near-term, so a concessionary modification is granted to the borrower that would otherwise not be considered.  TDR loans accrue interest as long as the borrower complies with the revised terms and conditions and has demonstrated repayment performance at a level commensurate with the modified terms over several payment cycles.

Below is a summary of information for TDR loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Number
Number
of
Recorded
Commitments
of
Recorded
Commitments
contracts
investment
outstanding
contracts
investment
outstanding
(Amounts In Thousands)
(Amounts In Thousands)
Agriculture
1
$
122
$
-
-
$
-
$
-
Commercial and financial
12
1,856
54
11
1,927
15
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
-
-
-
-
-
-
Construction, land development and commercial
3
190
-
3
401
-
Mortgage, farmland
1
288
-
1
295
-
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
11
1,701
-
8
1,277
-
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
-
-
-
2
90
8
Mortgage, multi-family
3
6,051
-
5
7,364
-
Mortgage, commercial
7
10,475
-
8
10,771
-
Loans to individuals
-
-
-
-
-
-
38
$
20,683
$
54
38
$
22,125
$
23

The Company had no loan modifications considered TDR loans during the three months ended September 30, 2013.  The following is a summary of TDR loans that were modified during the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Number
Pre-modification
Post-modification
of
recorded
recorded
contracts
investment
investment
(Amounts In Thousands)
Agriculture
1
$
125
$
125
Commercial and financial
2
66
66
Real estate:
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first lien
3
483
448
6
$
674
$
639

The Company had commitments to lend $0.05 million in additional borrowings to restructured loan customers as of September 30, 2013.  The Company had commitments to lend $0.02 million in additional borrowings to restructured loan customers as of December 31, 2012.  These commitments were in the normal course of business and allowed the borrowers to build pre-sold homes and commercial property, which was expected to increase their overall cash flow.  The additional borrowings were not used to facilitate payments on these loans.
Page 22

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

There were $0.09 million and $0.0 million of TDR loans that were in payment default (defined as past due 90 days or more) as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  As of September 30, 2013, TDR loans in payment default consisted of a $0.09 million land development construction loan.

Information regarding impaired loans as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 is as follows:

September 30, 2013
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
Average Recorded
Investment
Interest Income
Recognized
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
(Amounts In Thousands)
Agricultural
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Commercial and financial
990
2,442
-
998
11
1,053
33
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
140
140
-
229
-
229
-
Construction, land development and commercial
1,582
3,237
-
1,751
2
1,883
4
Mortgage, farmland
288
288
-
288
4
291
14
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
2,447
3,353
-
2,466
7
2,436
21
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
199
471
-
199
-
218
-
Mortgage, multi-family
476
1,077
-
484
-
676
-
Mortgage, commercial
2,745
5,555
-
2,919
12
3,026
35
Loans to individuals
-
20
-
-
-
-
-
$
8,867
$
16,583
$
-
$
9,334
$
36
$
9,812
$
107
With an allowance recorded:
Agricultural
$
123
$
123
$
3
$
124
$
1
$
124
$
4
Commercial and financial
878
878
13
895
12
925
37
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Construction, land development and commercial
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mortgage, farmland
171
171
4
171
3
171
8
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
1,807
2,080
68
1,819
22
1,859
66
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
66
66
1
66
1
67
3
Mortgage, multi-family
5,643
5,643
200
5,660
64
5,691
192
Mortgage, commercial
9,048
9,048
18
9,072
135
9,124
402
Loans to individuals
12
12
1
12
1
13
1
$
17,748
$
18,021
$
308
$
17,819
$
239
$
17,974
$
713
Total:
Agricultural
$
123
$
123
$
3
$
124
$
1
$
124
$
4
Commercial and financial
1,868
3,320
13
1,893
23
1,978
70
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
140
140
-
229
-
229
-
Construction, land development and commercial
1,582
3,237
-
1,751
2
1,883
4
Mortgage, farmland
459
459
4
459
7
462
22
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
4,254
5,433
68
4,285
29
4,295
87
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
265
537
1
265
1
285
3
Mortgage, multi-family
6,119
6,720
200
6,144
64
6,367
192
Mortgage, commercial
11,793
14,603
18
11,991
147
12,150
437
Loans to individuals
12
32
1
12
1
13
1
$
26,615
$
34,604
$
308
$
27,153
$
275
$
27,786
$
820
Page 23

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

Information regarding impaired loans as of December 31, 2012 is as follows:

Recorded
Investment
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
(Amounts In Thousands)
Agricultural
$
-
$
-
$
-
Commercial and financial
364
1,911
-
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
714
946
-
Construction, land development and commercial
2,264
3,520
-
Mortgage, farmland
806
808
-
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
952
1,332
-
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
68
361
-
Mortgage, multi-family
2,027
2,766
-
Mortgage, commercial
2,369
5,046
-
Loans to individuals
-
20
-
$
9,564
$
16,710
$
-
With an allowance recorded:
Agricultural
$
-
$
-
$
-
Commercial and financial
1,788
1,788
22
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
-
-
-
Construction, land development and commercial
-
-
-
Mortgage, farmland
-
-
-
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
2,286
2,487
83
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
259
259
7
Mortgage, multi-family
6,331
6,331
241
Mortgage, commercial
9,530
9,530
20
Loans to individuals
-
-
-
$
20,194
$
20,395
$
373
Total:
Agricultural
$
-
$
-
$
-
Commercial and financial
2,152
3,699
22
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
714
946
-
Construction, land development and commercial
2,264
3,520
-
Mortgage, farmland
806
808
-
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
3,238
3,819
83
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
327
620
7
Mortgage, multi-family
8,358
9,097
241
Mortgage, commercial
11,899
14,576
20
Loans to individuals
-
20
-
$
29,758
$
37,105
$
373
Page 24

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 5. Loans (continued)

Impaired loans decreased $3.14 million from December 31, 2012 to September 30, 2013.  Impaired loans include any loan that has been placed on nonaccrual status, accruing loans past due 90 days or more and TDR loans.  Impaired loans also include loans that, based on management’s evaluation of current information and events, the Company expects to be unable to collect in full according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement.  Impaired loans were 1.49% of loans held for investment as of September 30, 2013 and 1.73% as of December 31, 2012.  The decrease in impaired loans is due mainly to a decrease in nonaccrual loans of $1.62 million from December 31, 2012 to September 30, 2013 primarily resulting from the payoff of $1.24 million in multi-family real estate loans and a decrease in accruing loans past due 90 days or more of $1.15 million.

The Company regularly reviews a substantial portion of the loans in the portfolio and assesses whether the loans are impaired in accordance with ASC 310.  If the loans are impaired, the Company determines if a specific allowance is appropriate.  In addition, the Company's management also reviews and, where determined necessary, provides allowances for particular loans based upon (1) reviews of specific borrowers and (2) management’s assessment of areas that management considers are of higher credit risk, including loans that have been restructured.  Loans that are determined not to be impaired and for which there are no specific allowances are classified into one or more risk categories. Based upon the risk category assigned, the Company allocates a percentage, as determined by management, for a required allowance needed.  The determination of the appropriate percentage begins with historical loss experience factors, which are then adjusted for levels and trends in past due loans, levels and trends in charged-off and recovered loans, trends in volume growth, trends in problem and watch loans, trends in restructured loans, local economic trends and conditions, industry and other conditions, and effects of changing interest rates.

Specific allowances for losses on impaired loans are established if the loan balances exceed the net present value of the relevant future cash flows or the fair value of the relevant collateral based on updated appraisals and/or updated collateral analysis for the properties if the loan is collateral dependent.  The Company recognizes a charge off related to an impaired loan if there is a collateral shortfall or it is unlikely the borrower can make all principal and interest payments as contractually due.

For loans that are collateral dependent, losses are evaluated based on the portion of a loan that exceeds the fair market value of the collateral.  In general, this is the amount that the carrying value of the loan exceeds the related appraised value less estimated costs to sell the collateral.  Generally, it is the Company’s policy not to rely on appraisals that are older than one year prior to the date the impairment is being measured.  The most recent appraisal values may be adjusted if, in the Company’s judgment, experience and other market data indicate that the property’s value, use, condition, exit market or other variable affecting its value may have changed since the appraisal was performed, consistent with the December 2006 joint interagency guidance on the allowance for loan losses.  The charge off or loss adjustment supported by an appraisal is considered the minimum charge off.  Any adjustments made to the appraised value are to provide an additional charge off or specific reserve based on the applicable facts and circumstances.  In instances where there is an estimated decline in value, a specific reserve may be provided or a charge off taken pending confirmation of the amount of the loss from an updated appraisal.  Upon receipt of the new appraisals, an additional specific reserve may be provided or charge off taken based on the appraised value of the collateral.  On average, appraisals are obtained within one month of order.

Page 25

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of September 30, 2013 are as follows:
September 30, 2013
Carrying
Amount
Estimated Fair
Value
Readily
Available
Market
Prices(1)
Observable
Market
Prices(2)
Company
Determined
Market
Prices(3)
(Amounts In Thousands)
Financial instrument assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
56,923
$
56,923
$
56,923
$
-
$
-
Investment securities
235,259
235,259
-
235,259
-
Loans held for sale
2,811
2,811
2,811
Loans
Agricultural
80,199
82,894
-
-
82,894
Commercial and financial
161,302
166,959
-
-
166,959
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
30,895
30,371
-
-
30,371
Construction, land development and commercial
65,453
64,522
-
-
64,522
Mortgage, farmland
128,816
128,334
-
-
128,334
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
590,719
592,889
-
-
592,889
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
102,326
102,810
-
-
102,810
Mortgage, multi-family
237,866
239,274
-
-
239,274
Mortgage, commercial
308,204
309,885
-
-
309,885
Loans to individuals
18,781
18,963
-
-
18,963
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
42,416
42,371
-
-
42,371
Accrued interest receivable
8,460
8,460
-
8,460
-
Total financial instrument assets
$
2,070,430
$
2,082,727
$
56,923
$
246,530
$
1,779,274
Financial instrument liabilities:
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing deposits
$
250,226
$
250,226
$
-
$
250,226
$
-
Interest-bearing deposits
1,443,079
1,448,957
-
1,448,957
-
Short-term borrowings
29,163
29,163
-
29,163
-
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
125,000
133,029
-
133,029
-
Accrued interest payable
1,092
1,092
-
1,092
-
Total financial instrument liabilities
$
1,848,560
$
1,862,467
$
-
$
1,862,467
$
-
Face Amount
Financial instrument with off-balance sheet risk:
Loan commitments
$
362,985
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Letters of credit
11,229
-
-
-
-
Total financial instrument liabilities with off-balance-sheet risk
$
374,214
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(1) Considered Level 1 under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”).
(2) Considered Level 2 under ASC 820.
(3) Considered Level 3 under ASC 820 and are based on valuation models that use significant assumptions that are not observable in an active market.
Page 26

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

The carrying value and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of December 31, 2012 are as follows:

December 31, 2012
Carrying
Amount
Estimated Fair
Value
Readily
Available
Market
Prices(1)
Observable
Market
Prices(2)
Company
Determined
Market
Prices(3)
(Amounts In Thousands)
Financial instrument assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
63,582
$
63,582
$
63,582
$
-
$
-
Investment securities
234,244
234,244
-
234,244
-
Loans held for sale
28,256
28,256
-
28,256
-
Loans
Agricultural
74,537
72,605
-
-
72,605
Commercial and financial
143,461
138,350
-
-
138,350
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
24,940
25,516
-
-
25,516
Construction, land development and commercial
76,770
78,827
-
-
78,827
Mortgage, farmland
112,095
116,751
-
-
116,751
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
577,027
603,442
-
-
603,442
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
102,730
107,049
-
-
107,049
Mortgage, multi-family
212,972
223,295
-
-
223,295
Mortgage, commercial
309,242
323,639
-
-
323,639
Loans to individuals
19,968
20,148
-
-
20,148
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
42,663
42,487
-
-
42,487
Accrued interest receivable
7,851
7,851
-
7,851
-
Total financial instrument assets
$
2,030,338
$
2,086,042
$
63,582
$
270,351
$
1,752,109
Financial instrument liabilities:
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing deposits
$
273,973
$
273,973
$
-
$
273,973
$
-
Interest-bearing deposits
1,388,571
1,400,509
-
1,400,509
-
Short-term borrowings
38,783
38,783
-
38,783
-
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
125,000
136,842
-
136,842
-
Accrued interest payable
1,361
1,361
-
1,361
-
Total financial instrument liabilities
$
1,827,688
$
1,851,468
$
-
$
1,851,468
$
-
Face Amount
Financial instrument with off-balance sheet risk:
Loan commitments
$
344,120
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Letters of credit
10,778
-
-
-
-
Total financial instrument liabilities with off-balance-sheet risk
$
354,898
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
(1) Considered Level 1 under ASC 820.
(2) Considered Level 2 under ASC 820.
(3) Considered Level 3 under ASC 820 and are based on valuation models that use significant assumptions that are not observable in an active market.

Page 27

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Fair value of financial instruments :  FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) provides a single definition for fair value, a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures concerning fair value.  Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

The Company determines the fair market value of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC 820.  There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as follows:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1.  Observable inputs include the quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

Level 3 Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments.  Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

It is the Company’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements.  Recent market conditions have led to diminished, and in some cases, non-existent trading in certain of the financial asset classes.  The Company is required to use observable inputs, to the extent available, in the fair value estimation process unless that data results from forced liquidations or distressed sales.  Despite the Company’s best efforts to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs, the current market environment has diminished the observability of trades and assumptions that have historically been available.

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for estimating fair value for assets or liabilities not recorded at fair value.

ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents :  The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and short-term instruments approximate their fair values (Level 1).

Investment securities available for sale :  Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.  Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available.  If a quoted price is not available, the fair value is obtained from benchmarking the security against similar securities.  All of the Company’s securities are considered Level 2.

The pricing for investment securities is obtained from an independent source.  There are no level 1 or level 3 investment securities owned by the Company.  The Company obtains an understanding of the independent source’s valuation methodologies used to determine fair value by level of security. The Company validates assigned fair values on a sample basis using an additional third-party provider pricing service to determine if the fair value measurement is reasonable.  Due to the nature of our investment portfolio, we do not expect significant and unusual fluctuations as fair value changes primarily relate to interest rate changes.   No unusual fluctuations were identified during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.   If a fluctuation requiring investigation was identified, the Company would research the change with the independent source or other available information.

Page 28

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

ASSETS (continued)

Loans held for sale :  Loans held for sale are carried at historical cost.  The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between origination of the loan and its sale on the secondary market (Level 2).  The market is active for these loans and as a result prices for similar assets are available.

Loans :  The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis.  For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values (Level 3).  The fair values for other loans are determined using estimated future cash flows, discounted at the interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality utilizing an entrance price concept (Level 3).  The Company does record nonrecurring fair value adjustments to loans to reflect (1) partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or appraised value of the collateral or (2) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value (Level 3).  These loans are considered Level 3 as the instruments used to determine fair market value require significant management judgment and estimation.

Foreclosed assets :  The Company does not record foreclosed assets at fair value on a recurring basis.  Foreclosed assets consist mainly of other real estate owned but may include other types of assets repossessed by the Company.  Foreclosed assets are adjusted to the lower of carrying value or fair value less the cost of disposal.   Fair value is generally based upon independent market prices or appraised values of the collateral, and may include a marketability discount as deemed necessary by management based on its experience with similar types of real estate.  The value of foreclosed assets is evaluated periodically as a nonrecurring fair value adjustment.  Foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3.

Off-balance sheet instruments :  Fair values for outstanding letters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties' credit standing.  The fair value of the outstanding letters of credit is not significant. Unfunded loan commitments are not valued since the loans are generally priced at market at the time of funding (Level 2).

Accrued interest receivable :  The fair value of accrued interest receivable equals the amount receivable due to the current nature of the amounts receivable (Level 2).

Non-marketable equity investments :  Non-marketable equity investments are recorded under the cost or equity method of accounting.  There are generally restrictions on the sale and/or liquidation of these investments, including stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank.  The carrying value of stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank approximates fair value (Level 2).
Page 29

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

LIABILITIES

Deposit liabilities :  Deposit liabilities are carried at historical cost.  The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market account deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.  If the fair value of the fixed maturity certificates of deposit is calculated at less than the carrying amount, the carrying value of these deposits is reported as the fair value (Level 2).  Deposit liabilities are classified as Level 2 due to available prices for similar liabilities in the market.

Short-term borrowings :  Short-term borrowings are carried at historical cost and include federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.  The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the relatively short time between the origination of the liability and its expected realization (Level 2).  Short-term borrowings are classified as Level 2 due to available prices for similar liabilities in the market.

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings :  Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings are recorded at historical cost.  The fair values of the Company’s Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements (Level 2).  Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings are classified as Level 2 due to available prices for similar liabilities in the market.

Accrued interest payable :  The fair value of accrued interest payable equals the amount payable due to the current nature of the amounts payable (Level 2).

Page 30

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below represents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

September 30, 2013
Readily
Available
Market
Prices(1)
Observable
Market
Prices(2)
Company
Determined
Market
Prices(3)
Total at
Fair Value
(Amounts In Thousands)
State and political subdivisions
$
-
$
135,056
$
-
$
135,056
Other securities (FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA)
-
92,623
-
92,623
Total
$
-
$
227,679
$
-
$
227,679

December 31, 2012
Readily
Available
Market
Prices(1)
Observable
Market
Prices(2)
Company
Determined
Market
Prices(3)
Total at
Fair Value
(Amounts In Thousands)
State and political subdivisions
$
-
$
134,332
$
-
$
134,332
Other securities (FHLB, FHLMC and FNMA)
-
91,850
-
91,850
Total
$
-
$
226,182
$
-
$
226,182
(1) Considered Level 1 under ASC 820.
(2) Considered Level 2 under ASC 820.
(3) Considered Level 3 under ASC 820 and are based on valuation models that use significant assumptions that are not observable in an active market.

There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 .

Page 31

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company is required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP.  These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.  The following tables present the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013
September 30, 2013
September 30, 2013
Readily
Available
Market
Prices(1)
Observable
Market
Prices(2)
Company
Determined
Market
Prices(3)
Total at
Fair Value
Total Losses
Total Losses
(Amounts in Thousands)
Impaired Loans
Agricultural
$
-
$
-
$
120
$
120
$
-
$
-
Commercial and financial
-
-
1,855
1,855
-
5
Real Estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
-
-
140
140
-
-
Construction, land development and commercial
-
-
1,582
1,582
-
-
Mortgage, farmland
-
-
455
455
-
-
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
-
-
4,186
4,186
72
317
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
-
-
264
264
-
59
Mortgage, multi-family
-
-
5,919
5,919
41
41
Mortgage, commercial
-
-
11,775
11,775
-
229
Loans to individuals
-
-
11
11
-
-
Foreclosed assets
-
-
250
250
23
23
Total
$
-
$
-
$
26,557
$
26,557
$
136
$
674
(1) Considered Level 1 under ASC 820.
(2) Considered Level 2 under ASC 820.
(3) Considered Level 3 under ASC 820 and are based on valuation models that use significant assumptions that are not observable in an active market.
Page 32

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis (continued)

Year Ended
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2012
Readily
Available
Market
Prices(1)
Observable
Market
Prices(2)
Company
Determined
Market
Prices(3)
Total at
Fair Value
Total Losses
(Amounts in Thousands)
Impaired Loans
Agricultural
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Commercial and financial
-
-
2,130
2,130
302
Real Estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
-
-
714
714
-
Construction, land development and commercial
-
-
2,264
2,264
1,176
Mortgage, farmland
-
-
806
806
-
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
-
-
3,155
3,155
665
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
-
-
320
320
82
Mortgage, multi-family
-
-
8,117
8,117
-
Mortgage, commercial
-
-
11,879
11,879
210
Loans to individuals
-
-
-
-
12
Foreclosed assets
-
-
234
234
164
Total
$
-
$
-
$
29,619
$
29,619
$
2,611

(1) Considered Level 1 under ASC 820.
(2) Considered Level 2 under ASC 820.
(3) Considered Level 3 under ASC 820 and are based on valuation models that use significant assumptions that are not observable in an active market.

Collateral-dependent impaired loans are evaluated and valued at the time the loan is identified as impaired, at the lower of cost or fair value and are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.  Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans.  Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets and is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers hired by the Company.  Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, change in market conditions from the time of valuation, and/or management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and the client’s business.

Foreclosed assets in the table above consist of property acquired through foreclosures and settlements of loans.  Property acquired is carried at the estimated fair value of the property, less disposal costs, and is classified as a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.  The estimated fair value of the property is determined based on appraisals by licensed appraisers hired by the Company.  Appraised and reported values are discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, and /or management’s expertise and knowledge of the property.

During the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company revised the classification of impaired loans and foreclosed assets from previous filings.  In previous filings, the Company classified impaired loans and foreclosed assets as Level 2 under ASC 820.  The Company revised the classification to Level 3 as the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation due to the inherent subjectivity of the inputs used to determine value.  The resulting change in presentation does not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.

Page 33

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 7. Stock Repurchase Program

On July 26, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to a total of 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “2005 Stock Repurchase Program”).  The authorization was previously set to expire on December 31, 2013.  In September 2012 the Company’s Board of Directors extended the expiration date of the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program to December 31, 2014.  The Company expects the purchases pursuant to the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program to be made from time to time in private transactions at a price equal to the most recent quarterly independent appraisal of the shares of the Company’s common stock and with the Board reviewing the overall results of the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program on a quarterly basis.  All purchases made pursuant to the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program since its inception have been made on that basis.  The amount and timing of stock repurchases will be based on various factors, such as the Board’s assessment of the Company’s capital structure and liquidity, the amount of interest shown by shareholders in selling shares of stock to the Company at their appraised value, and applicable regulatory, legal and accounting factors.  The Company has purchased 341,666 shares of its common stock in privately negotiated transactions from August 1, 2005 through September 30, 2013.  Of these 341,666 shares, 4,208 shares were purchased during the quarter ended September 30, 2013, at an average price per share of $72.68.

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

Concentrations of credit risk :  The Bank’s loans, commitments to extend credit, unused lines of credit and outstanding letters of credit have been granted to customers primarily within the Bank's market area.  Investments in securities issued by state and political subdivisions within the state of Iowa totaled approximately $61.82 million.  The concentrations of credit by type of loan are set forth in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  Outstanding letters of credit were granted primarily to commercial borrowers.  Although the Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its debtors' ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon the economic conditions in Johnson, Linn and Washington Counties, Iowa.

Contingencies :  In the normal course of business, the Company and Bank are involved in various legal proceedings.  In the opinion of management, any liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk :  The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.  These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, credit card participations and standby letters of credit.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, credit card participations and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.  The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.  A summary of the Bank’s commitments at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows:

September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
(Amounts In Thousands)
Firm loan commitments and unused portion of lines of credit:
Home equity loans
$
37,858
$
36,030
Credit cards
42,440
44,554
Commercial, real estate and home construction
111,696
96,326
Commercial lines and real estate purchase loans
170,991
167,210
Outstanding letters of credit
11,229
10,778

Page 34

HILLS BANCORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 9. Income Taxes

Federal income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was computed using the consolidated effective federal tax rate.  The Company also recognized income tax expense pertaining to state franchise taxes payable individually by the subsidiary bank.  The Company files a consolidated tax return for federal purposes and separate tax returns for State of Iowa purposes.  The tax years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.  For state tax purposes, the tax years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 remain open for examination.  There were no material unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2013  and December 31, 2012 and therefore no interest or penalties on unrecognized tax benefits has been recorded.  As of September 30, 2013, the Company does not anticipate any significant increase in unrecognized tax benefits during the twelve-month period ending September 30, 2014.

Income taxes as a percentage of income before taxes were 29.61% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 28.97% for the same period in 2012.  The increase in the effective tax rate is due to tax-exempt interest income and income tax credits and the relationship to total income before income taxes.

Note 10. Subsequent Event

The Company intends to enter into two interest rate swaps prior to year ending December 31, 2013.  Each interest rate swap will be in a notional amount of $25.00 million.  The intent of the interest rate swaps is to fix the interest rates on the Company’s future cash flows attributable to interest payments on $50.00 million of variable rate debt.

Page 35

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition of Hills Bancorporation (“Hills Bancorporation” or “the Company”) and its banking subsidiary Hills Bank and Trust Company (“the Bank”) for the dates and periods indicated.  The discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying footnotes.

Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This report contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain.  Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company include, but are not limited to, the following:

· The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts its operations which may be less favorable than expected and may result in, among other things, a deterioration in the credit quality and value of the Company’s assets.

· The effects of financial market disruptions, and monetary and other governmental actions designed to address such disruptions.

· The financial strength of the counterparties with which the Company or the Company’s customers do business and as to which the Company has investment or financial exposure.

· The credit quality and credit agency ratings of the securities in the Company’s investment securities portfolio, a deterioration or downgrade of which could lead to other-than-temporary impairment of the affected securities and the recognition of an impairment loss.

· The effects of, and changes in, laws, regulations and policies affecting banking, securities, insurance and monetary and financial matters as well as any laws otherwise affecting the Company.

· The effects of changes in interest rates (including the effects of changes in the rate of prepayments of the Company’s assets) and the policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

· The ability of the Company to compete with other financial institutions as effectively as the Company currently intends due to increases in competitive pressures in the financial services sector.

· The ability of the Company to obtain new customers and to retain existing customers.

· The timely development and acceptance of products and services, including products and services offered through alternative electronic delivery channels.

· Technological changes implemented by the Company and by other parties, including third party vendors, which may be more difficult or more expensive than anticipated or which may have unforeseen consequences to the Company and its customers.
Page 36

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

· The ability of the Company to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems.

· The ability of the Company to retain key executives and employees and the difficulty that the Company may experience in replacing key executives and employees in an effective manner.

· Consumer spending and saving habits which may change in a manner that affects the Company’s business adversely.

· The economic impact of natural disasters, terrorist attacks and military actions.

· Business combinations and the integration of acquired businesses and assets which may be more difficult or expensive than expected.

· The costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation.

· Changes in accounting policies and practices that may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board.

· The ability of the Company to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated.

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning the Company and its business, including other factors that could materially affect the Company’s financial results, is included in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial information contained within these financial statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on approximate measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective decisions and assessments, management has identified its most critical accounting policies to be those which are related to the allowance for loan losses. The Company's allowance for loan losses methodology incorporates a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative in establishing an allowance for loan losses that management believes is appropriate at each reporting date. Quantitative factors include the Company's historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, changes in impaired loans, and other factors. Quantitative factors also incorporate known information about individual loans, including borrowers' sensitivity to interest rate movements. Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in the Company's markets, including economic conditions throughout the Midwest and the state of certain industries.  Determinations relating to the possible level of future loan losses are based in part on subjective judgments by management.  The future impact of the global recession has introduced additional uncertainty into such determinations.  Future loan losses in excess of current estimates, could materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial position.  Size and complexity of individual credits in relation to loan structure, existing loan policies and pace of portfolio growth are other qualitative factors that are considered in the methodology. As the Company adds new products and increases the complexity of its loan portfolio, it will enhance its methodology accordingly. This discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein, as well as other relevant portions of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.  Although management believes the levels of the allowance as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio, a decline in local economic conditions, or other factors, could result in increasing losses that cannot be reasonably predicted at this time.

Page 37

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Overview

This overview highlights selected information and may not contain all of the information that is important to you in understanding our performance during the period.  For a more complete understanding of trends, events, commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources, and critical accounting estimates, you should carefully read this entire report.

The Company is a holding company engaged in the business of commercial banking.  The Company’s subsidiary is Hills Bank and Trust Company, Hills, Iowa (the “Bank”), which is wholly-owned.  The Bank was formed in Hills, Iowa in 1904.  The Bank is a full-service commercial bank extending its services to individuals, businesses, governmental units and institutional customers primarily in the communities of Hills, Iowa City, Coralville, North Liberty, Lisbon, Mount Vernon, Kalona, Wellman, Cedar Rapids and Marion, Iowa.  At September 30, 2013, the Bank has seventeen full-service locations.

Net income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 was $20.35 million compared to $21.47 million for the same nine months of 2012, a decrease of 5.22%.  The $1.12 million decrease in net income was caused by a number of factors.  The principal factors in the decrease in net income for the first nine months of 2013 are an increase in the provision for loan losses of $2.59 million, a decrease in other income of $0.79 million and a decrease in other expenses of $2.17 million.

The Company achieved a return on average assets of 1.23% and a return on average equity of 11.36% for the twelve months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the twelve months ended September 30, 2012, which were 1.34% and 12.77%, respectively. Dividends of $1.10 per share were paid in January 2013 to 2,199 shareholders.  The 2012 dividend was $1.05 per share.

The Bank’s net interest income is the largest component of revenue and it is primarily a function of the average earning assets and the net interest margin percentage. The Bank achieved a net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis of 3.55% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 3.63% for the same nine months of 2012.  Average earning assets were $1.985 billion in 2013 and $1.937 billion in 2012.

Highlights noted on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2013 for the Company included the following:

Ÿ Total assets were $2.134 billion, an increase of $34.42 million since December 31, 2012.
Ÿ Cash and cash equivalents were $56.92 million, a decrease of $6.66 million since December 31, 2012.
Ÿ Net loans were $1.770 billion, an increase of $45.16 million since December 31, 2012.
Ÿ Total deposits were $1.693 billion, an increase of $30.76 million since December 31, 2012.

Reference is made to Note 6 for a discussion of fair value measurements which relate to methods used by the Company in recording assets and liabilities on its financial statements.
Page 38

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Financial Condition

The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
(Amounts In Thousands)
(Amounts In Thousands)
Agricultural
$
82,740
4.62
%
$
76,190
4.43
%
Commercial and financial
166,175
9.27
148,034
8.60
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
31,852
1.78
25,788
1.50
Construction, land development and commercial
67,302
3.76
79,097
4.59
Mortgage, farmland
131,105
7.32
113,841
6.61
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
596,838
33.31
583,567
33.90
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
103,278
5.76
104,278
6.06
Mortgage, multi-family
239,795
13.38
214,812
12.48
Mortgage, commercial
310,847
17.35
312,506
18.15
Loans to individuals
19,034
1.06
20,350
1.18
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
42,761
2.39
43,102
2.50
$
1,791,727
100.00
%
$
1,721,565
100.00
%
Net unamortized fees and costs
626
597
$
1,792,353
$
1,722,162
Less allowance for loan losses
24,750
25,160
$
1,767,603
$
1,697,002
Loan demand has been steady and is expected to remain steady throughout the year ending December 31, 2013.  As indicated above, growth in the commercial loan portfolio and real estate loans secured by farmland have been primarily responsible for the increase in total loans as a result of general improvement in market conditions.  Management expects the commercial loan growth to remain steady or increase due to seasonality and fluctuations in commercial loan demand.  Real estate loans secured by farmland are expected to increase based on increasing agricultural land prices along with growth in the Bank’s agricultural customer base.

The Bank has an established formal loan origination policy.  In general, the loan origination policy attempts to reduce the risk of credit loss to the Bank by requiring, among other things, maintenance of minimum loan to value ratios, evidence of appropriate levels of insurance carried by borrowers and documentation of appropriate types and amounts of collateral and sources of expected payment.  The collateral relied upon in the loan origination policy is generally the property being financed by the Bank.  The source of expected payment is generally the income produced from the property being financed.  Personal guarantees are required of individuals owning or controlling at least 20% of the ownership of an entity.  Limited or proportional guarantees may be accepted in circumstances if approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.  Financial information provided by the borrower is verified as considered necessary by reference to tax returns, or audited, reviewed or compiled financial statements.  The Bank does not originate subprime loans.  In order to modify, restructure or otherwise change the terms of a loan, the Bank’s policy is to evaluate each borrower situation individually.  Modifications, restructures, extensions and other changes are done to improve the Bank’s position and to protect the Bank’s capital.  If a borrower is not current with its payments, any additional loans to such borrowers are evaluated on an individual borrower basis.

Page 39

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The Company has not experienced any significant time lapses in recognizing the required provisions for collateral dependent loans, nor has the Company delayed appropriate charge offs.  When an updated appraisal value has been obtained, the Company has used the appraisal amount in determining the appropriate charge off or required reserve.  The Company also evaluates any changes in the financial condition of the borrower and guarantors (if applicable), economic conditions, and the Company’s loss experience with the type of property in question.  Any information utilized in addition to the appraisal is intended to identify additional charge offs or provisions, not to override the appraised value.

In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102, Selected Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues, the Company determines and assigns ratings to loans using factors that include the following: an assessment of the financial condition of the borrower; a realistic determination of the value and adequacy of underlying collateral; the condition of the local economy and the condition of the specific industry of the borrower; an analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories; and a review of delinquent and classified loans.

Through the credit risk rating process, loans are reviewed to determine if they are performing in accordance with the original contractual terms. If the borrower has failed to comply with the original contractual terms, further action may be required by the Company, including a downgrade in the credit risk rating, movement to non-accrual status, a charge-off or the establishment of a specific impairment reserve. In the event a collateral shortfall is identified during the credit review process, the Company will work with the borrower for a principal reduction and/or a pledge of additional collateral and/or additional guarantees. In the event that these options are not available, the loan may be subject to a downgrade of the credit risk rating. If the Company determines a loan amount or portion thereof is uncollectible, the loan’s credit risk rating is immediately downgraded and the uncollectible amount is charged-off.  The Bank’s credit and legal departments undertake a thorough and ongoing analysis to determine if additional impairment and/or charge-offs are appropriate and to begin a workout plan for the loan to minimize actual losses.

The following table presents the allowance for loan losses on loans by type of loans and the percentage in each category to total loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

September 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Amount
% of Total
Allowance
% of Loans to
Total Loans
Amount
% of
Total
Allowance
% of Loans
to Total
Loans
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Agricultural
$
2,541
10.27
%
4.62
%
$
1,653
6.57
%
4.43
%
Commercial and financial
4,873
19.69
9.27
4,573
18.18
8.60
Real estate:
Construction, 1 to 4 family residential
957
3.87
1.78
848
3.37
1.50
Construction, land development and commercial
1,849
7.47
3.76
2,327
9.25
4.59
Mortgage, farmland
2,289
9.25
7.32
1,746
6.94
6.61
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family first liens
6,119
24.72
33.31
6,540
25.99
33.90
Mortgage, 1 to 4 family junior liens
952
3.85
5.76
1,548
6.15
6.06
Mortgage, multi-family
1,929
7.79
13.38
1,840
7.31
12.48
Mortgage, commercial
2,643
10.68
17.35
3,264
12.97
18.15
Loans to individuals
253
1.02
1.06
382
1.52
1.18
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
345
1.39
2.39
439
1.75
2.50
$
24,750
100.00
%
100.00
%
$
25,160
100.00
%
100.00
%

Page 40

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The allowance for loan losses totaled $24.75 million at September 30, 2013 compared to $25.16 million at December 31, 2012.  The percentage of the allowance to outstanding loans was 1.38% and 1.46% at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  The allowance was based on management’s consideration of a number of factors, including composition of the loan portfolio, loans with higher credit risks and the overall amount of loans outstanding.  The reduction in the allowance in 2013 is the result of a decrease in the historical loss rates used in the allowance for loan losses calculation as well as improvements in asset quality.  Credit quality has improved to levels experienced prior to the recession.  Improvement of credit quality has been trending throughout the Bank’s market.

The adequacy of the allowance is reviewed quarterly and adjusted as appropriate after consideration has been given to the impact of economic conditions on the borrowers’ ability to repay, loan collateral values, past collection experience, the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio and such other factors that deserve current recognition. The growth of the loan portfolio and the trends in problem and watch loans are significant elements in the determination of the provision for loan losses.  Quantitative factors include the Company’s historical loss experience, which is then adjusted for levels and trends in past due, levels and trends in charged-off and recovered loans, trends in volume growth, trends in problem and watch loans, trends in restructured loans, local economic trends and conditions, industry and other conditions, and effects of changing interest rates.

Management has determined that the allowance for loan losses was appropriate at September 30, 2013, and that the loan portfolio is diversified and secured, without undue concentration in any specific risk area. This process involves a high degree of management judgment; however, the allowance for loan losses is based on a comprehensive, well documented, and consistently applied analysis of the Company’s loan portfolio. This analysis takes into consideration all available information existing as of the financial statement date, including environmental factors such as economic, industry, geographical and political factors. The relative level of allowance for loan losses is reviewed and compared to industry data. This review encompasses levels of total impaired loans, portfolio mix, portfolio concentrations, current geographic risks and overall levels of net charge-offs.

Residential real estate loan products that include features such as loan-to-values in excess of 100% or interest only payments, which expose a borrower to payment increases in excess of changes in the market interest rate, increase the credit risk of a loan.  The Bank has not offered and does not intend to offer this type of loan product.

Investment securities available for sale held by the Company increased by $1.50 million from December 31, 2012 to September 30, 2013.  The fair value of securities available for sale was $2.15 million more than the amortized cost of such securities as of September 30, 2013.  At December 31, 2012, the fair value of the securities available for sale was $6.41 million more than the amortized cost of such securities.

Deposits increased by $30.76 million in the first nine months of 2013.  Repurchase agreements decreased $9.62 million in the same period.  In the opinion of the Company’s management, the Company continues to have sufficient liquidity resources available to fund expected additional loan growth.

Brokered deposits are included in total deposits and totaled $38.98 million as of September 30, 2013 with an average rate of 0.57%.  Brokered deposits were $41.54 million as of December 31, 2012 with an average rate of 0.70%.  As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, brokered deposits were 2.30% and 2.50% of total deposits, respectively.

Page 41

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Dividends and Equity

In January 2013, Hills Bancorporation paid a dividend of $5.19 million or $1.10 per share.  The dividend was $1.05 per share in January 2012.  After payment of the dividend and the adjustment for accumulated other comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2013 totaled $239.10 million.  Under risk-based capital rules, the total amount of Tier 1 risk-based capital was 15.99% and 15.33% as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  The Tier 1 risk-based capital was in excess of the required minimum of 8.00%.  Risk-based capital was 17.24% and 16.59% as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. As of September 30, 2013, the most recent notifications from the Federal Reserve System categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.

In July 2013, the Officer of the Comptroller of the Currency and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System adopted a final rule implementing agreements reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in “Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems”(BASEL III).   The final rule also adopts changes to the agencies’ regulatory capital requirements that meet the requirements of section 171 and section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.  The rule implements a revised definition of regulatory capital, a new 4.50% common equity tier 1 minimum capital requirement, a 6.00% tier 1 capital requirement, and a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.00%.   The Bank expects to remain categorized as well capitalized under the final rule when it becomes effective on January 1, 2015.

Page 42

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Net Income Overview

Net income decreased $1.12 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the first nine months of 2012.  Total net income was $20.35 million in 2013 and $21.47 million in the comparable period in 2012, a decrease of 5.22%.  The changes in net income in 2013 from the first nine months of 2012 were primarily the result of the following:

Ÿ Net interest income decreased by $0.11 million.
Ÿ The provision for loan losses increased by $2.59 million.
Ÿ Other income decreased by $0.79 million.
Ÿ Other expenses decreased by $2.17 million.

For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, basic earnings per share were $4.32 and $4.52, respectively. Diluted earnings per share were $4.31 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $4.51 for the same period in 2012.  The Company’s net income continues to be driven primarily by four primary factors.  The first important factor is the interaction between changes in net interest margin and changes in average earning assets, and the impact of those changes on net interest income.  The second significant factor affecting the Company’s net income is the provision for loan losses.  The third factor is the amount of loans originated for sale into the secondary market, and the fourth factor affecting net income is income tax expense.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the excess of the interest and fees earned on interest bearing assets over the interest expense of the interest bearing liabilities.  The factors that have the greatest impact on net interest income are the respective volumes of average interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and the net interest margin, which represents the average of the yield earned on interest earning assets over the rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.  Net interest income of $50.74 million for the first nine months of 2013 was derived from the Company’s $1.985 billion of average earning assets during that period and its tax-equivalent net interest margin of 3.55%.  Average earning assets in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $1.937 billion and the tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.63%. The importance of net interest margin is illustrated by the fact that a decrease in the net interest margin of 10 basis points to 3.45% would have resulted approximately in a $1.49 million decrease in income before income taxes in the nine month period ended September 30, 2013. Similarly, an increase in the net interest margin of 10 basis points to 3.65% would have resulted in approximately a $1.49 million increase in net interest income before taxes.  The decrease in net interest income for the nine month period was due to the decrease in interest rates on average earning assets, which have continued to trend downward.   The decrease in interest rates on average earnings assets result from the assets repricing from pre-recession rates and locking in for an average of 5 years at the current historically low interest rates available.  The Company has been able to lower the average cost of funding to the current level over the past 5 years.  While lower interest rates have allowed the Company to also reduce its interest expense, this reduction has not kept pace with the reduction in yield on the asset side, which is commonly referred to as “net interest compression.”  Based on our current rate environment there is diminished opportunity to continue to lower funding costs.  As a result, the Company expects continued net interest compression to impact earnings for the foreseeable future.  The Company believes net interest margin in dollars will be contingent on the growth of the Company’s earning assets.

Page 43

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Net Interest Income (continued)

The net interest margin for the first nine months of 2013 was 3.55% compared to 3.63% in 2012 for the same period.  The measure is shown on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35% to make the interest earned on taxable and non-taxable assets more comparable.  The change in average balances and average rates between periods and the effect on the net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the nine months ended in 2013 compared to the comparable period in 2012 are shown in the following table:

Increase (Decrease) in Net Interest Income
Change in
Average Balance
Change in
Average Rate
Volume Changes
Rate Changes
Net Change
(Amounts in Thousands)
Interest income:
Loans, net
$
52,153
(0.38
)%
$
1,673
$
(4,849
)
$
(3,176
)
Taxable securities
(1,837
)
(0.74
)
(55
)
(523
)
(578
)
Nontaxable securities
14,212
(0.56
)
480
(553
)
(73
)
Federal funds sold
(17,049
)
-
(33
)
-
(33
)
$
47,479
$
2,065
$
(5,925
)
$
(3,860
)
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand deposits
$
61,840
-
%
$
(97
)
$
9
$
(88
)
Savings deposits
56,196
(0.01
)
(81
)
18
(63
)
Time deposits
(47,927
)
(0.33
)
753
1,403
2,156
Short-term borrowings
(8,686
)
(0.08
)
25
23
48
FHLB borrowings
(58,963
)
0.15
1,926
(144
)
1,782
Interest-bearing other liabilities
(66
)
(0.26
)
1
5
6
$
2,394
$
2,527
$
1,314
$
3,841
Change in net interest income
$
4,592
$
(4,611
)
$
(19
)

Rate/volume variances are allocated on a consistent basis using the absolute values of changes in volume compared to the absolute values of the changes in rates.  Loan fees included in interest income are not material.  Interest on nontaxable securities and loans is shown on a tax-equivalent basis.

A summary of the net interest spread and margin is as follows:
(Tax Equivalent Basis)
2013
2012
Yield on average interest-earning assets
4.41
%
4.77
%
Rate on average interest-bearing liabilities
1.08
1.40
Net interest spread
3.33
%
3.37
%
Effect of noninterest-bearing funds
0.22
0.26
Net interest margin (tax equivalent interest income divided by average interest-earning assets)
3.55
%
3.63
%
Page 44

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Net Interest Income (continued)

In pricing loans and deposits, the Bank considers the U.S. Treasury indexes as benchmarks in determining interest rates.  The Federal Open Market Committee met six times during the first nine months of 2013.  The target rate remains unchanged since December 31, 2008 at 0.25%.  Interest rates on loans are generally affected by the target rate since interest rates for the U.S. Treasury market normally increase or decrease when the Federal Reserve Board raises or lowers the federal funds rate.  As of September 30, 2013, the rate indexes for the one, three and five year indexes were 0.11%, 0.73% and 1.54%, respectively.  The one year index decreased 38.89% from 0.18% at September 30, 2012, the three year index increased 102.78% and the five year index increased 120.00%.  The three year index was 0.36% and the five year index was 0.70% at September 30, 2012.  The targeted federal funds rate was 0.25% at September 30, 2013 and 2012.  The Company anticipates no significant changes in the indexes for 2013.  U.S. Treasury indexes are expected to remain low into 2015.

Provision for Loan Losses

The majority of the Company’s interest-earning assets are in net loans outstanding, which amounted to approximately $1.770 billion at September 30, 2013.  The provision is computed on a quarterly basis and is a result of management’s determination of the quality of the loan portfolio.  The provision reflects a number of factors, including the size of the loan portfolio, the overall composition of the loan portfolio and loan concentrations, the borrowers’ ability to repay, past loss experience, loan collateral values, the level of impaired loans and loans past due ninety days or more.  In addition, management considers the credit quality of the loans based on management’s review of problem and watch loans, including loans with historically higher credit risk.  The provision for loan losses was a reduction in expense of $0.31 million in 2013 compared to a reduction of expense of $2.90 million in 2012.  The reduction in expense in 2012 and 2013 was the result of a decrease in the historical loss rates used in the allowance for loan losses calculation as well as improvements in credit quality.  The Company believes that the provision for loan losses will increase for the foreseeable future resulting from projected increases in the size of the Company’s loan portfolio as well as stabilization of credit quality.

The allowance for loan losses decreased $0.41 million during the first nine months of 2013.  In the first nine months of 2013, there was a decrease of $0.55 million due to the volume and composition of loans outstanding and a $0.14 million increase in the amount allocated to the allowance due to a combination of deterioration in credit quality and charge-offs.  The Company believes the period of deteriorating credit quality is stabilizing.

The allowance for loan losses balance is affected by charge-offs, net of recoveries, for the periods presented.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, recoveries were $2.02 million and $2.06 million, respectively; and charge-offs were $2.12 million in 2013 and $3.14 million in 2012.  The allowance for loan losses totaled $24.75 million at September 30, 2013 compared to $25.16 million at December 31, 2012.  The allowance represented 1.38% and 1.46% of loans held for investment at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The provision reflects a number of factors, including the size of the loan portfolio, the overall composition of the loan portfolio and loan concentrations, the impact on the borrowers’ ability to repay, past loss experience, loan collateral values, the level of impaired loans and loans past due ninety days or more.  In addition, management considers the credit quality of the loans based on management’s review of problem and watch loans, including loans with historical higher credit risks.  Management expects credit quality to remain steady through the end of 2013.  Provision expense is expected to be dependent on the Company’s loan growth through the end of 2013.
Page 45

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Noninterest Income

The following table sets forth the various categories of noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
$ Change
% Change
(Amounts in thousands)
Net gain on sale of loans
$
1,793
$
2,589
$
(796
)
(30.75
)%
Trust fees
3,740
3,450
290
8.41
Service charges and fees
5,969
5,802
167
2.88
Rental revenue on tax credit real estate
1,114
1,189
(75
)
(6.31
)
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned and other reposessed assets
168
604
(436
)
(72.19
)
Other noninterest income
1,939
1,880
59
3.14
$
14,723
$
15,514
$
(791
)
(5.10
)%

Loans originated for sale in the first nine months of 2013 totaled $178.87 million compared to $235.16 million in the same period in 2012, a decrease of 23.94%.  In the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the net gain on sale of loans was $1.79 million and $2.59 million, respectively.  The amount of the net gain on sale of secondary market mortgage loans in each year can vary significantly.  The volume of activity in these types of loans is directly related to the level of interest rates.  A substantial portion of the decreased net gain on sale of loans resulted from a residential mortgage loan market where interest rates began to increase, resulting in a decline in the origination of loans generated for sale into the secondary market. The servicing of the loans sold into the secondary market is not retained by the Company so these loans do not provide an ongoing stream of income.  The Company believes residential mortgage interest rates will continue to rise for the foreseeable future resulting in decreased net gain on sale of loan income.

Trust fees increased $0.29 million in the first nine months of 2013 as a result of assets under management increasing from $1.078 billion as of September 30, 2012 to $1.126 billion as of September 30, 2013 due to market conditions and new trust relationships.

The net gain on sale of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets decreased $0.44 million to a net gain of $0.17 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.  The total net gain on sale of other real estate owned for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 consisted of a $0.19 million net gain on sale of 11 properties offset by a $0.02 million fair market value adjustment on 1 property.  During the same period in 2012, the gain consisted of a $0.14 million fair market value adjustment on 6 properties within other real estate owned, offset by a $0.74 million net gain on sale of 19 properties.

Page 46

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Noninterest Expenses

The following table sets forth the various categories of noninterest expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
$ Change
% Change
(Amounts in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits
$
18,312
$
17,725
$
587
3.31
%
Occupancy
2,780
2,469
311
12.60
Furniture and equipment
3,650
3,477
173
4.98
Office supplies and postage
1,222
1,145
77
6.72
Advertising and business development
1,895
1,705
190
11.14
Outside services
5,378
5,026
352
7.00
Rental expenses on tax credit real estate
1,571
1,774
(203
)
(11.44
)
FDIC insurance assessment
760
784
(24
)
(3.06
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt - Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
-
3,544
(3,544
)
(100.00
)
Other noninterest expense
1,298
1,382
(84
)
(6.08
)
$
36,866
$
39,031
$
(2,165
)
(5.55
)%

Noninterest expenses of $36.87 million decreased $2.17 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from the same period in 2012, a decrease of 5.55%.  The decrease in noninterest expenses is primarily attributed to a $3.54 million prepayment penalty paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 on the Bank’s prepayment of $40.00 million of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings.  Most other noninterest expense categories experienced marginal period-to-period increases for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Occupancy expense was $2.78 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 an increase of $0.31 million from the same period in 2012.  The negative variance is due to an increase of $0.07 million of janitorial expense resulting from an increase in offices using an outside service as well as a $0.11 million increase in building repairs and maintenance due to expenses associated with building upkeep.

Advertising and business development expense was $1.90 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 which was a $0.19 million increase from the same period in 2012.  The increase is primarily due to an increase in expense related to debit card reward point program started in late 2012.

Income Taxes

Federal and state income tax expenses were $8.56 million and $8.76 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Income taxes as a percentage of income before taxes were 29.61% in 2013 and 28.97% in 2012.
Page 47

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Net Income Overview

Net income increased to $6.62 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $5.50 million for the same period in 2012, an increase of 20.36%.  Earnings per share, both basic and diluted, increased for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 as a result of the increase in net income.  For the three month period ended September 30, 2013, basic earnings per share was $1.41 and diluted earnings per share was $1.40.  For the three months ended September 30, 2012, basic and diluted earnings per share was $1.16.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the excess of the interest and fees earned on interest-earning bearing assets over the interest expense of the interest-bearing liabilities.  The factors that have the greatest impact on net interest income are the volume of average earning assets and the net interest margin.  The decrease in net interest income for the three month period was due to the decrease in the interest rates on average earning assets, which have continued to trend downward.  While lower interest rates have allowed the Company to also reduce its interest expense, this reduction has not kept pace with the reductions in yield on the asset side, which is commonly referred to as “net interest compression.”  Based on our current rate environment there is diminished opportunity to continue to lower funding costs.  As a result, the Company expects continued net interest compression to impact earnings for the foreseeable future.  The Company believes net interest margin in dollars will be contingent on the growth of the Company’s earning assets.

The net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was 3.54% compared to 3.55% in 2012 for the same period.  The measure is shown on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35% to make the interest earned on taxable and non-taxable assets more comparable.  The change in average balances and average rates between periods and the effect on the net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the three months ended in 2013 compared to the comparable period in 2012 are shown in the following table:

Increase (Decrease) in Net Interest Income
Change in Average Balance
Change in Average Rate
Volume Changes
Rate Changes
Net Change
(Amounts in Thousands)
Interest income:
Loans, net
$
63,385
(0.35
)%
$
793
$
(1,559
)
$
(766
)
Taxable securities
(1,477
)
(0.60
)
(23
)
(134
)
(157
)
Nontaxable securities
11,470
(0.54
)
127
(179
)
(52
)
Federal funds sold
(31,594
)
-
(21
)
-
(21
)
$
41,784
$
876
$
(1,872
)
$
(996
)
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand deposits
$
67,154
(0.01
)%
$
(36
)
$
9
$
(27
)
Savings deposits
56,487
(0.01
)
(27
)
8
(20
)
Time deposits
(58,071
)
(0.34
)
285
474
759
Short-term borrowings
(13,643
)
(0.09
)
13
7
20
FHLB borrowings
(56,889
)
0.14
620
(47
)
574
Interest-bearing other liabilities
(70
)
0.01
-
-
-
$
(5,032
)
$
855
$
451
$
1,306
Change in net interest income
$
1,731
$
(1,421
)
$
310

Page 48

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Net Interest Income (continued)

Rate/volume variances are allocated on a consistent basis using the absolute values of changes in volume compared to the absolute values of the changes in rates.  Loan fees included in interest income are not material.  Interest on nontaxable securities and loans is shown on a tax-equivalent basis.

A summary of the net interest spread and margin is as follows:

(Tax Equivalent Basis)
2013
2012
Yield on average interest-earning assets
4.36
%
4.65
%
Rate on average interest-bearing liabilities
1.04
1.37
Net interest spread
3.32
%
3.28
%
Effect of noninterest-bearing funds
0.22
0.27
Net interest margin (tax equivalent interest income divided by average interest-earning assets)
3.54
%
3.55
%

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was an expense of $0.11 million in 2013 compared to a reduction of expense of $0.61 million in 2012, an increase of $0.72 million.  The reduction in expense in 2012 was greater than 2013 as the result of decreases in historical loss rates used in the allowance for loan losses calculation as well as improvements in asset quality.  The Company believes that the provision for loan losses will increase for the foreseeable future resulting from projected increases in the size of the Company’s loan portfolio as well as stabilization of credit quality.

The allowance for loan losses increased $0.35 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013.  In the three months ended September 30, 2013, there was an increase of $0.64 million due to the volume and composition of loans outstanding and a $0.29 million decrease in the amount allocated to the allowance due to a combination of an improvement in credit quality and charge-offs.  The Company believes the period of deteriorating credit quality is stabilizing.

The allowance for loan losses balance is affected by charge-offs, net of recoveries, for the periods presented.  For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, recoveries were $0.69 million and $0.79 million, respectively; and charge-offs were $0.45 million in 2013 and $0.68 million in 2012.  The allowance for loan losses totaled $24.75 million at September 30, 2013 compared to $26.17 million at September 30, 2012.  The allowance represented 1.38% and 1.55% of loans held for investment at September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

Page 49

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Noninterest Income

The following table sets forth the various categories of noninterest income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Three Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
$ Change
% Change
(Amounts in thousands)
Net gain on sale of loans
$
531
$
1,023
$
(492
)
(48.09
)%
Trust fees
1,185
1,160
25
2.16
Service charges and fees
2,022
1,970
52
2.64
Rental revenue on tax credit real estate
398
397
1
0.25
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned and other reposessed assets
18
163
(145
)
(88.96
)
Other noninterest income
591
608
(17
)
(2.80
)
$
4,745
$
5,321
$
(576
)
(10.83
)%

In the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the net gain on sale of loans was $0.53 million and $1.02 million, respectively.  The amount of the net gain on sale of secondary market mortgage loans in each year can vary significantly.  The volume of activity in these types of loans is directly related to the level of interest rates.  A substantial portion of the decreased net gain on sale of loans resulted from a residential mortgage loan market where interest rates began to increase, resulting in a decline in the value of loans generated for sale into the secondary market.  The servicing of the loans sold into the secondary market is not retained by the Company so these loans do not provide an ongoing stream of income.  The Company believes residential mortgage interest rates will continue to rise for the foreseeable future resulting in decreased net gain on sale of loan income.

Trust fees increased $0.03 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 as a result of assets under management increasing from $1.078 billion as of September 30, 2012 to $1.126 billion as of September 30, 2013 due to market conditions and new trust relationships.

The net gain on sale of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets decreased $0.15 million to a net gain of $0.02 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013.  The total net gain on sale of other real estate owned for the three months ended September 30, 2013 consisted of a $0.04 million net gain on sale of 3 properties and a $0.02 million fair market value adjustment on 1 property.  During the same period in 2012, the gain consisted of a $0.02 million fair market value adjustment on 1 property within other real estate owned and a $0.18 million net gain on sale of 5 properties.

Page 50

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Discussion of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Noninterest Expenses

The following table sets forth the various categories of noninterest expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Three Months Ended September 30,
2013
2012
$ Change
% Change
(Amounts in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits
$
6,158
$
5,782
$
376
6.50
%
Occupancy
907
773
134
17.34
Furniture and equipment
1,183
1,183
-
-
Office supplies and postage
445
427
18
4.22
Advertising and business development
624
608
16
2.63
Outside services
1,819
1,689
130
7.70
Rental expenses on tax credit real estate
614
560
54
9.64
FDIC insurance assessment
229
259
(30
)
(11.58
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt - Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
-
3,544
(3,544
)
(100.00
)
Other noninterest expense
432
447
(15
)
(3.36
)
$
12,411
$
15,272
$
(2,861
)
(18.73
)%
Other expenses of $12.41 million decreased $2.86 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from the same period in 2012, a decrease of 18.73%.  The decrease in noninterest expenses is primarily attributed to a $3.54 million prepayment penalty paid during the three months ended September 30, 2012 on the Bank’s prepayment of $40.00 million of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings.  Most other noninterest expense categories experienced marginal period-to-period increases for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Occupancy expense increased by $0.13 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from the same period in 2012.  The increase is due to a $0.11 million increase in building repairs and maintenance due to expenses associated with building upkeep.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013 the Bank has not incurred any loss on extinguishment of debt relating to prepayment of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings.  As of September 30, 2012 the Bank incurred a prepayment penalty of $3.54 million resulting from the Bank prepayment of $40.00 million of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings.

Income Taxes

Federal and state income tax expenses were $2.71 million and $1.97 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Income taxes as a percentage of income before taxes were 29.00% in 2013 and 26.37% in 2012.
Page 51

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Liquidity

The Company actively monitors and manages its liquidity position with the objective of maintaining sufficient cash flows to fund operations, meet client commitments, take advantage of market opportunities and provide a margin against unforeseeable liquidity needs.  Federal funds sold and investment securities available for sale are readily marketable assets.  Maturities of all investment securities are managed to meet the Company’s normal liquidity needs, to respond to market changes or to adjust the Company’s interest rate risk position.  Investment securities available for sale comprised 10.67% of the Company’s total assets at September 30, 2013, compared to 10.77% at December 31, 2012.

The Company has historically maintained a stable deposit base and a relatively low level of large deposits, which has mitigated the volatility in the Company’s liquidity position.  As of September 30, 2013, the Company had borrowed $125.00 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Des Moines. Advances are used as a means of providing both long and short-term, fixed-rate funding for certain assets and for managing interest rate risk.  The Company had additional borrowing capacity available from the FHLB of approximately $406.02 million at September 30, 2013.

As additional sources of liquidity, the Company has the ability to borrow up to $10.00 million from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, and has lines of credit with three banks totaling $209.17 million. The borrowings under these credit lines would be secured by the Bank’s investment securities.  The combination of high levels of potentially liquid assets, low dependence on volatile liabilities and additional borrowing capacity provided sources of liquidity for the Company which management considered sufficient at September 30, 2013.

As of September 30, 2013, investment securities with a carrying value of $29.16 million were pledged to collateralize public and trust deposits, short-term borrowings and for other purposes, as permitted by law.  As of December 31, 2012, investment securities with a carrying value of $38.78 million were pledged.

Contractual Obligations

There have been no material changes with regard to contractual obligations disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Page 52

HILLS BANCORPORATION

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company's primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates.  Interest rate risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings or capital arising from movements in interest rates.  Interest rate risk arises from repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and options risk.  Repricing risk is the difference between the timing of rate changes and the timing of cash flows.  Basis risk is the difference from changing rate relationships among different yield curve affecting Bank activities.  Yield curve risk is the difference from changing rate relationships across the spectrum of maturities.  Option risk is the difference resulting from interest-related options imbedded in Bank products.  The Bank’s primary source of interest rate risk exposure arises from repricing risk.  To measure this risk the Bank uses a static gap measurement system that identifies the repricing gaps across the full maturity spectrum of the Bank’s assets and liabilities and an earnings simulation approach.  The gap schedule is known as the interest rate sensitivity report.  The report reflects the repricing characteristics of the Bank’s assets and liabilities.  The report details the calculation of the gap ratio.  This ratio indicated the amount if interest-earning assets repricing within a given period in comparison to the amount of interest-bearing liabilities repricing within the same period of time.  A gap ratio of 1.0 indicates a matched position, in which case the effect on net interest income due to interest rate movements will be minimal.  A gap ratio of less than 1.0 indicates that more liabilities than assets reprice within the time period, and a ratio greater than 1.0 indicates that more assets reprice than liabilities.

The Company's asset/liability management, or its management of interest rate risk, is focused primarily on evaluating and managing net interest income given various risk criteria.  Factors beyond the Company's control, such as market interest rates and competition, may also have an impact on the Company's interest income and interest expense.  In the absence of other factors, the Company's overall yield on interest-earning assets will increase as will its cost of funds on its interest-bearing liabilities when market interest rates increase over an extended period of time.  Inversely, the Company's yields and cost of funds will decrease when market rates decline.  The Company is able to manage these swings to some extent by attempting to control the maturity or rate adjustments of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities over given periods of time.

The Bank maintains an Asset/Liability Committee, which meets at least quarterly to review the interest rate sensitivity position and to review and develop various strategies for managing interest rate risk within the context of the following factors: 1) capital adequacy, 2) asset/liability mix, 3) economic outlook, 4) market characteristics and 5) the interest rate forecast.  In addition, the Bank uses a simulation model to review various assumptions relating to interest rate movement.  The model attempts to limit rate risk even if it appears the Bank’s asset and liability maturities are perfectly matched and a favorable interest margin is present.  The Bank’s policy is to generally maintain a balance between profitability and interest rate risk.

In order to minimize the potential effects of adverse material and prolonged increases or decreases in market interest rates on the Company's operations, management has implemented an asset/liability program designed to mitigate the Company's interest rate sensitivity.  The program emphasizes the origination of adjustable rate loans, which are held in the portfolio, the investment of excess cash in short or intermediate term interest-earning assets, and the solicitation of transaction deposit accounts, which are less sensitive to changes in interest rates and can be re-priced rapidly.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Page 53

HILLS BANCORPORATION
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

No material legal proceedings are pending.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table sets forth information about the Company’s stock purchases, all of which were made pursuant to the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program, for the three months ended September 30, 2013:

Period
Total number of
shares purchased
Average price
paid per share
Total number of shares
purchased as part of
publicly announced
plans or programs
Maximum number
of shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plans or
programs (1)
July 1 to July 31
1,328
$
72.00
338,786
411,214
August 1 to August 31
806
73.00
339,592
410,408
September 1 to September 30
2,074
73.00
341,666
408,334
Total
4,208
$
72.68
341,666
408,334
(1)  On July 26, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “2005 Stock Repurchase Program”).  The Company’s Board of Directors authorized the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program to December 31, 2014. The Company expects the purchases pursuant to the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program to be made from time to time in private transactions at a price equal to the most recent quarterly independent appraisal of the shares of the Company’s common stock and with the Board reviewing the overall results of the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program on a quarterly basis.  All purchases made pursuant to the 2005 Stock Repurchase Program since its inception have been made on that basis.  The amount and timing of stock repurchases will be based on various factors, such as the Board’s assessment of the Company’s capital structure and liquidity, the amount of interest shown by shareholders in selling shares of stock to the Company at their appraised value, and applicable regulatory, legal and accounting factors.

During the first nine months of 2013, the Company issued 800 shares of restricted stock under the 2010 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.  The restricted shares were issued to officers of the Company for no cash consideration and will vest over a five-year period from the date of grant.  The issuance of these shares was exempt from the registration requirements of the SEC pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Hills Bancorporation has no senior securities.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None

Page 54

HILLS BANCORPORATION
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)

Item 6. Exhibits

3.1 Articles of Incorporation of Hills Bancorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form S-3 filed with the Commission on May 12, 2011.
3.2 By-laws of Hills Bancorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form S-3 filed with the Commission on May 12, 2011.
31 Certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32 Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS XBRL Instance Document (1)
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1)
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (1)
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1)
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1)

(1) Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and are otherwise not subject to liability under these sections.

Page 55

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

HILLS BANCORPORATION
Date:  November 7, 2013
By: /s/ Dwight O. Seegmiller
Dwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 7, 2013
By: /s/ Shari DeMaris
Shari DeMaris, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer

Page 56

HILLS BANCORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

Exhibit
Number
Description
Page Number In The Sequential
Numbering System September
30, 2013 Form 10-Q
Certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
58-59
Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
60
Page 57

TABLE OF CONTENTS