HHHEF 20-F Report ended Dec. 31, 2009

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.   20549

FORM   20-F

(  ) REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

(  ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to _____________

OR

(  )  SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report:  _______

Commission file number 016353

KOKOMO ENTERPRISES INC.

(formerly Zab Resources Inc.)

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia, Canada

(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)

Suite 1000, 1111 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 2K3

(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:

Common Stock, Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Common Shares Without Par Value

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:  None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:  8,420,278 common shares as of December 31, 2009 and 10,920,278 as of May 31, 2010.  No preferred shares issued and outstanding

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   Yes [   ]     No [X]

- 1 -

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   Yes [  ]    No [X ]

Note- Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes [X]    No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [  ]                         Accelerated filer [   ]                   Non-accelerated filer [X]

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S.  GAAP [  ]

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued

Other [X]

By the International Accounting Standards Board [  ]

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17 [X]

Item 18 [  ]

If this is an Annual Report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)

Yes [    ]     No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (s 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes [    ]     No [X]

- 2 -

KOKOMO ENTERPRISES INC.

(formerly ZAB Resources Inc.)

FORM 20-F ANNUAL REPORT 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

4

4

4

8

16

24

29

33

33

36

45

47

47

47

47

48

49

50

50

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

- 3 -

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The selected financial data in Table I has been derived from the audited financial statements of Kokomo Enterprises Inc. (formerly Zab Resources Inc.) (hereinafter referred to as the “Company” or the “Registrant” or “Kokomo”) which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada.  The information should be read in conjunction with the Registrant's financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 17 of this Annual Report.

All financial figures presented herein and throughout this Annual Report are expressed in Canadian dollars (Cdn$) unless otherwise specified.  On April 16, 2009, the Company’s share capital was consolidated on the basis of twenty-five old for one-new common share. All common shares and per share amounts included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F (2009) and in the Company’s Audited Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 have been restated to give retroactive effect to the 25:1 share consolidation, which took effect on April 16, 2009 as described in Results of Operations in Item 4.(a) of this document and in note 1 to the Audited Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

TABLE I

Note : All common shares and per share amounts included in the above table  for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 have been restated to give retroactive effect to the 25:1 consolidation described in Information on the Company under Item 4.  of this Annual Report.

- 4 -

Had the financial statements of Kokomo been prepared in accordance with accounting principles and practices generally accepted in the United States and required by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), certain selected financial data would be disclosed as per Table II.

TABLE II

A discussion of the differences between accounting principles and practices generally accepted in Canada and accounting principles and practices generally accepted in the United States and required by the SEC is contained in Note 13 to the financial statements included in Item 17 of this Annual Report.

Exchange Rates

⁽¹⁾ The high and low exchange rate in each month has been calculated using the monthly rate of the Bank of       Canada.

⁽²⁾ The average exchange rate for the period has been calculated using the yearly rate of the Bank of Canada.

⁽³⁾ The high and low exchange rate in each period was determined from the yearly rate of the Bank of Canada.

All of the amounts in the Exchange rates tables above are stated in U.S. currency.  Accordingly, at the closing on December 31, 2009, the U.S. $1.00 was equal to Cdn $1.0510.  At the closing on May 31, 2010, the U.S. $1.00 was equal to Cdn $1.0435.

- 5 -

The Company, and the Securities of the Company, should be considered a highly speculative investment. The following risk factors should be given special consideration when evaluating an investment in any of the Company's Securities:

1). RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS

- Regulations : Kokomo’s proposed mineral exploration programs, are subject to extensive federal, provincial and local laws and regulations governing such exploration, development and operation of mining activities as well as the protection of the environment, including laws and regulations relating to obtaining permits to mine, protection of air and water quality, hazardous waste management, mine reclamation and the protection of endangered or threatened species.

- Exploration and Development :  The resource properties in which the Company has an interest are in the exploration stages only and do not have a known body of commercial ore.  Exploration and development of natural resource properties involve a high degree of risk and few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing properties.  Substantial expenditures are required to establish reserves through drilling, to develop processes to extract the resources and, in the case of new properties, to develop the extraction and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for extraction.  Although substantial benefits may be derived from the discovery of a major deposit, no assurance can be given that resources will be discovered in sufficient quantities or grades to justify commercial operations or that the funds required for development can be obtained on a timely basis.

- Operating Hazards and Risks : Exploration for natural resources involves many risks, which even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome.  Operations in which the Company has a direct or indirect interest will be subject to all the hazards and risks normally incidental to exploration, development and production of resources, any of which could result in work stoppages, damages to persons or property and possible environmental damages.  Although the Company may obtain liability insurance in an amount which it considers adequate, the nature of these risks is such that liabilities might exceed policy limits, the liabilities and hazards might not be insurable against, or the Company might not elect to insure itself against such liabilities due to high premium costs or other reasons, in which event the Company could incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon its financial condition.

- Fluctuating Metal Prices :  The prices of those commodities have fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years, and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company's control including international, economic and political trends, expectations of inflation or deflation, currency exchange rate fluctuations, interest rates fluctuations, global or regional consumptive patterns, speculative activities and increased production due to new extraction developments and improved extraction and production methods.  The effect of these factors on the prices of metals, and therefore the economic viability of the Company's interest in exploration projects, cannot be accurately predicted.

- Environmental Factors :  Should the Company decide to conduct any mineral exploration works then all phases of the Company's mineral exploration works shall be subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates.  Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees.

- Competition :  The resource industry is intensely competitive in all of its respective phases, and the Company competes with many companies possessing much greater financial resources and technical facilities than the Company.  As such, competition is adversely affecting the Company's ability to acquire suitable mineral exploration properties at reasonable prices.

- 6 -

- Management :  The Company is dependent on a relatively small number of key employees, the loss of any of whom could have an adverse effect on the Company.

- Dilution :  There are a number of outstanding securities and agreements pursuant to which common shares of the Company may be issued in the future.  This will result in further dilution to the Company's shareholders.

- Revenues and Dividends :  In the past, the Company used to generate some revenues and does not anticipate generating any revenues in the near future.  Consequently, if the Company requires additional funds for the exploration and development of its interests in mineral properties or for operating capital purposes, or for acquiring interests in other mineral properties, the Company will have to seek equity or debt financing which may or may not be available.  Furthermore, the Company has not paid any dividends in the past and does not expect to pay dividends in the future.  In the event of generating any earnings, the Company expects to retain its earnings to finance further growth and, when appropriate, retire debt.

- Requirement of New Capital :  As a company without any revenues, the Company typically needs more capital than it has available to it or can expect to generate through the sale of its assets.  In the past, the Company has had to raise, by way of debt and equity financings, considerable funds to meet its capital needs.  There is no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to raise funds needed for its business.  Failure to raise the necessary funds in a timely fashion will limit the Company's growth.

- U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations :  The Company is classified as a Passive Foreign Investment Company ("PFIC") for U.S. Federal Income Tax purposes.  Classification as a PFIC will create U.S. Tax consequences to a U.S. shareholder of the Company that are unique to the PFIC provisions and that are not encountered in other investments.  Prospective investors are advised to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of an investment in the common shares of the Company.

- Penny Stock :  The Company's securities are deemed to be Penny Stocks and are therefore subject to Penny Stock rules as defined in Rule 3a(51)(1) of the 1934 Exchange Act.  The Penny Stock disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity of the Company's securities in the secondary market.  Penny Stocks are low-priced shares of small companies not traded on a U.S. national exchange or quoted on Nasdaq.  The Company's securities are quoted for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board.  Penny Stocks, such as the Company's securities, can be very risky.  Prices of Penny Stocks are often not available.  Investors in Penny Stocks are often unable to sell stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock.  Investors may lose all their investment in Penny Stocks.  There is no guaranteed rate of return on Penny Stocks.  Before an investor purchases any Penny Stock, U.S. Federal law requires a salesperson to tell the investor the " offer " and the " bid " on the Penny Stock, and the " compensation " the salesperson and the firm receive for the trade.  The firm also must mail a confirmation of these prices to the investor after the trade.  The Investor's Broker-dealer is required to obtain the investor's signature to show that the investor has received the statement titled "Important Information on Penny Stocks" before the investor first trades in a Penny Stock.  This Statement is required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and contains important information on Penny Stocks.  Furthermore, under penalty of Federal Law the Investor's brokerage firm must tell the investor at two different times - before the investor agrees to buy or sell a Penny Stock, and after the trade, by written confirmation the following:  1) the bid and offer price quotes for the Penny Stock, and the number of shares to which the quoted prices apply, 2) the brokerage firm's compensation for the trade, 3) the compensation received by the brokerage firm's salesperson for the trade.  In addition, to these items listed above the investor's brokerage firm must send the investor monthly account statements and a written statement of the investor's financial situation and investment goals as required by the Securities Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990.

- Disruption in Trading :  Trading in the common shares of the Company may be halted for certain reasons, including the failure by the Company to submit documents to the Regulatory Authorities in the time periods required.

- 7 -

2). RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANY’S INVESTMENTS

On March 26, 2004, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.5 – Incorporated by reference) with an arm’s length party (the “Arm’s Length Party”) in respect to certain mineral claims, which are situated in the Kamloops Mining Division in British Columbia (the “Extra High Property”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Option Agreement as amended on March 8, 2005, the Company obtained the right to acquire a 100% undivided interest in the Extra High Property, subject to a 1.5% net smelter returns royalty (the “Arm’s Length Royalty”), by making staged cash payments totaling $150,000 and incurring exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property totaling $500,000 over a period of three years.  Upon the Company earning a 100% undivided interest in the Extra High Property, the Company obtained the right to purchase at any time 50% of the Arm’s Length Royalty by paying to the Arm’s Length Party the sum of $500,000 leaving the Arm’s Length Party with a 0.75% NSR royalty.

On September 8, 2006, the Company entered into an Option Agreement with Colt Resources Inc. (“Colt”) , a company formerly related by certain common officers and directors, whereby Colt obtained the right to acquire a 50% undivided interest, subject to the Arm’s Length Royalty in the Extra High Property by incurring exploration expenditures of $240,000 on the Extra High Property by no later than February 28, 2007 and by making cash payments to the Company totaling $133,770 by no later than March 26, 2007. On October 31, 2006, the Company and Colt entered into an Amending Agreement whereby Colt was granted an extension period until June 26, 2007 to incur exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property and to make the cash payments to the Company. On June 14, 2007, the Company amended its Option Agreement with Colt whereby Colt would have the right to acquire a 34% interest in the Extra High Property by making cash payments to the Company totalling $193,770 by no later than June 26, 2007. The Amending Agreement released Colt of the requirement to incur $240,000 in exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property.  Colt made its final payment to the Company and earned its 34% interest in the Extra High Property, thus reducing the Company’s interest to 66%.

On January 21, 2008, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (the “2008 Option Agreement”) ( Exhibit 10.11.3 - Incorporated by reference) with Colt Resources Inc. (“Colt”) whereby Colt was granted the right and option to acquire, in two separate equal tranches, the Company’s 66% undivided interest in the Extra High Property. Pursuant to the 2008 Option Agreement, Colt has exercised the first tranche of the option by making a cash payment of $250,000 to the Company and has acquired from the Company a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.  As a result of exercising the first tranche of the option, thus increasing its undivided interest to 67% in the Extra High Property, Colt has become the operator of the Extra High Property.  In order to exercise the second tranche of the option, Colt was required to make a cash payment of $250,000 to the Company on or before December 31, 2008.  As of December 31, 2008, Colt did not exercise the second tranche of the option.  As a result, Colt now holds a 67% undivided interest in the Extra High Property and the Company holds a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.  Pursuant to the Joint Venture which the Company and Colt have formed, each party shall henceforth contribute its proportionate share of property related expenditures.  If any party fails to contribute its share of future property related expenditures, then its interest will be diluted on a straight-line basis.  If any party’s interest is diluted to less than 10%, then that party’s interest in the Extra High Property will be converted into a 0.5% net smelter returns royalty.

Exploration for natural resources involves many risks, which even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome.  It is quite possible that the Company may lose all its investment in the Extra High Property and might have to write-off, in its entirety, the Company’s investment in the Extra High Property.

The legal and commercial name of the company is KOKOMO ENTERPRISES INC.

- 8 -

The Company was incorporated by memorandum under the Company Act of the Province of British Columbia, Canada on August 24, 1984 (Exhibit 3.1 – Incorporated by reference) and was registered extra-provincially in the Province of Ontario, Canada on October 19, 1984.  On May 31, 1988, the Company adopted as the French form of its name "Ressources Armeno Inc.".  On May 25, 1992, the name of the Company was changed to Ag Armeno Mines and Minerals Inc. in the English form, and "Les Mines et Mineraux Ag Armeno Inc." in the French form.  On April 25, 2000, the name of the Company was changed from Ag Armeno Mines and Minerals Inc. in the English form, and "Les Mines et Mineraux Ag Armeno Inc.", in the French form, to Golden Nugget Exploration Inc.  On May 2, 2002, the name of the Company was changed from Golden Nugget Exploration Inc. to Lucky 1 Enterprises Inc.  On January 17, 2005, the name of the Company was changed from Lucky 1 Enterprises Inc. to Bronx Ventures Inc. and the Company adopted new Articles (Exhibit 3.2 - Incorporated by reference).  On March 19, 2007, the Company changed its name to Zab Resources Inc.  On April 16, 2009, the Company changed its name from Zab Resources Inc. to Kokomo Enterprises Inc.

On April 4, 1985, the Company's common shares were listed and posted for trading on the Vancouver Stock Exchange, on the Montreal Exchange on January 15, 1988 and, on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on May 11, 1988.  On July 12, 1991, the Company voluntarily de-listed its common shares from the Montreal Exchange, and, on October 3, 1994, the Company's shares were delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market.  Effective October 4, 1994, the Company's shares have been listed for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board.  Effective November 29, 1999 the Vancouver Stock Exchange became known as the Canadian Venture Exchange (hereinafter referred to as the “CDNX”) as a result of the merger between the Vancouver Stock Exchange and the Alberta Stock Exchange.  On July 5, 2001, the Company made a formal application to the CDNX requesting the voluntary delisting of the Company’s common shares from trading on the CDNX, as a result of which, the common shares of the Company were delisted from trading on the CDNX effective at the close of trading on July 31, 2001.

On July 30, 1986, the Company's share capital split on the basis of one-old-for-two-new common shares. On May 25, 1992, the Company's share capital was consolidated on the basis of ten-old-for-one-new common share.  On April 25, 2000, the Company’s share capital was consolidated on the basis of fifteen-old-for-one-new common share.  On May 2, 2002, the Company’s share capital was consolidated on the basis of five-old-for-one-new common share and its authorized share capital was subsequently increased to 200,000,000 common shares without par value. On January 17, 2005, the Company’s share capital was consolidated on the basis of thirty-five-old-for-one-new common share and its authorized share capital was increased to an unlimited number of common and preferred shares without par value.  On March 19, 2007, the Company subdivided its capital stock on a 1 (old) share for 50 (new) shares basis.  As a result, the shares of Bronx Ventures Inc. were de-listed from trading and the shares of Zab Resources Inc. commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board in the USA under the symbol “ZABRF” on March 22, 2007.

Effective November 28, 2007, the common shares of the Company have been listed for trading on the Canadian National Stock Exchange (“CNSX”) (formerly known as the Canadian Trading and Quotation System (CNQ)) under the trading symbol “ZABK”.  On October 17, 2008, the Company’s CNSX symbol was changed to “ZAB” pursuant to the CNSX adopting a three character symbol format.

On April 16, 2009, the Company’s share capital was consolidated on the basis of 25 (old) shares for 1 (new) share basis.  As a result, the shares of Zab were de-listed from trading and the shares of Kokomo commenced trading in Canada on the CNSX under the symbol “KKO”, and in the U.S.A. the shares of Kokomo commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “KKOEF”.  The Cusip number of the Company’s common shares is 500323100.

The Company was registered extra-provincially under the Corporations Registration Act in the Province of Nova Scotia, Canada from June 26, 2008 until September 30, 2009.

- 9 -

Since its incorporation, the Company has been engaged primarily in the acquisition, exploration and, if warranted, the development of natural resource properties and, for a brief period of time, the Company, through its formerly owned Ecuadorean subsidiary, Armenonic del Ecuador S.A. (“Armenonic”) operated the San Bartolome lead/zinc/silver mine in Ecuador.

Kokomo is a junior mineral exploration company.  The Company has a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property located in the Province of British Columbia, and the Company has a one-half percent (1/2%) gross royalty interest in certain lithium mineral properties located in the Province of Ontario.  The principal business of Kokomo is in mineral exploration.  The Company's ability to pursue its stated primary business and to meet its obligations as they come due is dependent upon the ability of management to obtain the necessary financings either through private placements or by means of public offerings of the Company's securities or through the exercise of incentive stock options or warrants or through debt financings or through the sale of its assets.

Effective September 25, 2009, the Company's head office is located at:  Suite 1000 – 1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 2K3.  The telephone number is (604) 681-1519 (ext 6106) and the telefax number is (604) 681-9428.  The contact person is Bedo H. Kalpakian.

The Company's registered office and records office is located at:  P.O. Box 10068, #1600 -609 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V7Y 1C3.  The telefax number is (604) 669-3877.

The Registrar and Transfer Agent of the Company is Computershare Trust Company of Canada, 9 ^th Floor, 100 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2Y1.  The telefax number is (416) 981-9800.

The auditors of the Company are Smythe Ratcliffe, Chartered Accountants, 7 ^th floor, Marine Building, 355 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 2G8.  The telefax number is (604) 688-4675.

Summary

Kokomo is a junior mineral exploration company.  The Company has a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property located in the Province of British Columbia, and the Company has a one-half percent (1/2%) gross royalty interest in certain lithium mineral properties located in the Province of Ontario.  The principal business of Kokomo is in mineral exploration.

Kokomo is a reporting issuer in the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec and Ontario and files all public documents, including an AIF in its alternate form, on www.Sedar.com . The Company is a foreign private issuer in the United States of America and in this respect files, on EDGAR, its Annual Report on Form 20-F and other reports on Form 6K.  The following link, http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?action=getcompany&CIK=0000825171&owner=exclude&count=40 will give you direct access to the Company’s filings.

Presently, Kokomo is seeking mineral prospects of merit to get involved in.  It should be noted that there are no assurances that Kokomo shall be successful in its attempts of seeking mineral prospects of merit to get involved in.

In January 2009, as a result of the Company being invited by the Department of Natural Resources of the Province of Nova Scotia, Canada (“DNR”) to participate in a tender for a Special License in respect to the exploration of salt and potash on certain claims located in the Province of Nova Scotia, Canada, the Company participated in the tender and submitted to the DNR a deposit in the amount of $25,000 which represented 10% of the first year’s work program that the Company had proposed to conduct on the subject claims.  Due to the delay in being granted a Special License, the Company has withdrawn its application for a Special License and as a result, the DNR has refunded to the Company the application fee of $4,101 and the $25,000 deposit which were submitted by the Company in support of the Company’s application.  Consequently, the Company has decided not to renew its registration as an extra-provincially registered company under the Corporations Registration Act in the Province of Nova Scotia, Canada.  The Company was registered extra-provincially under the Corporations Registration Act in the Province of Nova Scotia, Canada from June 26, 2008 until September 30, 2009.

- 10 -

Not Applicable.

I. Extra High Property, Kamloops Mining Division, British Columbia, Canada

On March 26, 2004, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.5 – Incorporated by reference) with an arm’s length party (the “Arm’s Length Party”) in respect to certain mineral claims, which are situated in the Kamloops Mining Division in British Columbia (the “Extra High Property”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Option Agreement as amended on March 8, 2005, the Company obtained the right to acquire a 100% undivided interest in the Extra High Property, subject to a 1.5% net smelter returns royalty (the “Arm’s Length Royalty”), by making staged cash payments totalling $150,000 and incurring exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property totalling $500,000 over a period of three years.  Upon the Company earning a 100% undivided interest in the Extra High Property, the Company obtained the right to purchase at any time 50% of the Arm’s Length Royalty by paying to the Arm’s Length Party the sum of $500,000 leaving the Arm’s Length Party with a 0.75% NSR royalty.

In the spring of 2004, the Company commissioned an independent review of the Extra High Mineral Property by Erik Ostensoe, P. Geo., who prepared a report, dated the 22 ^nd day of April, 2004 titled “National Policy 43-101 Report, Extra High Mineral Property, Kamloops Mining Division, British Columbia”.  The report recommended exploration work programs be carried out on the Extra High Mineral Property in order to evaluate the mineral potential of the Extra High Mineral Property.  This report has been filed on www.Sedar.com by the Company.

Commencing in May, 2005 and up to December, 2005, the Company conducted its exploration program on the Extra High Property.  The exploration program consisted of soil sampling, geological mapping, trenching and diamond drilling.  A total of 1,874.3 metres of NQ diamond drilling and 455 lineal metres of trenching were completed while 194 soil samples were collected over 4 areas on the Extra High Mineral Property.  The exploration work program was conducted by, and was under the direct supervision of, J.W. Murton, P. Eng, a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.  At the time, Mr. J.W. Murton was a director of Kokomo.  Mr. J. W. Murton has recommended a two phase exploration program on the Extra High Mineral Property due to the positive results obtained from the 2005 exploration program.  Mr. J. W. Murton has prepared for Kokomo a Technical Report (NI 43-101) on the Extra High Property (2005 Exploration Program) dated February 28, 2006 which has been filed by the Company on www.Sedar.com , and on the Company’s Corporate Website, www.kokomoenterprises.ca .  For further particulars about the Extra High Mineral Property and the 2005 Exploration Program, please visit either www.sedar.com or www. kokomoenterprises.ca .

On September 8, 2006, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.11 – Incorporated by reference) with Colt whereby Colt obtained the right to acquire a 50% undivided interest, subject to the Arm’s Length Royalty, in the Extra High Property by incurring exploration expenditures of $240,000 on the Extra High Property by no later than February 28, 2007 and by making cash payments to the Company totaling $133,770 by no later than March 26, 2007.

On September 12, 2006, the Company and the Arm’s Length Party amended the Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.5.1 – Incorporated by reference) by entering into an Amending Agreement whereby the Company was granted an extension period until June 26, 2007 to make the balance of cash payments to the Arm’s Length Party and incur the remaining exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property.

- 11 -

On October 31, 2006, the Company and Colt entered into an Amending Agreement (Exhibit 10.11.2 – Incorporated by reference) whereby Colt was granted an extension period until June 26, 2007 to incur exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property and to make the cash payments to the Company.

Upon Colt earning its 50% undivided interest in the Extra High Property, the Company and Colt would thereafter equally contribute to all future exploration costs.  If any party would fail to contribute its share of future exploration costs, then its respective interest would be diluted on a straight-line basis.  If any party’s interest would be diluted to less than a 10% interest, then that party’s interest in the Extra High Property would be converted into a 0.5% NSR royalty.

On April 16, 2007, the Company and the Arm’s Length Party amended the Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.5.2 – Incorporated by reference) by entering into an Amending Agreement whereby the Company was released of the requirement to incur the remaining exploration expenditures but instead was required to make a cash payment of $60,000 (paid) to the Arm’s Length Party.

On June 14, 2007, the Company amended its Option Agreement with Colt whereby Colt would have the right to acquire a 34% interest in the Extra High Property by making cash payments to the Company totalling $193,770 by no later than June 26, 2007. The Amending Agreement released Colt of the requirement to incur $240,000 in exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property.

On June 26, 2007, the Company made its final payment to the Arm’s Length Party thereby earning a 100% undivided interest in the Extra High Property subject only to the Arm’s Length Royalty. Colt made its final payment to the Company and earned its 34% interest in the Extra High Property, thus reducing the Company’s interest to 66%.

During 2007, the Company and its joint venture partner Colt conducted a diamond drilling program on the Extra High Property.  A total of 1,293.59 metres were drilled in 8 NQ diamond drill holes.  The diamond drilling program was targeted at expanding the previously indicated mineralization in the K7 lens and was successful in revealing the potential for larger zones of lower grade mineralization lying adjacent to the massive sulphide mineralization indicated in earlier work.  The diamond drilling program was conducted by and was under the direct supervision of J. W. Murton, P. Eng., a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.  At the time, Mr. J. W. Murton was a director of the Company.  For further particulars about the diamond drilling program please see the report on the 2007 Diamond Drilling Program dated February 28, 2008 that was prepared for the Company and Colt by J. W. Murton, P. Eng. which has been filed by the Company on its corporate website www.kokomoenterprises.ca .

At December 31, 2007, the Company held a 66% interest in the Extra High Property.

As at December 31, 2007, Colt has made option payment totalling $193,770 to the Company.

On January 21, 2008, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (the “2008 Option Agreement”) ( Exhibit 10.11.3 - Incorporated by reference) with Colt whereby Colt was granted the right and option to acquire, in two separate equal tranches, the Company’s 66% undivided interest in the Extra High Property. Pursuant to the 2008 Option Agreement, Colt has exercised the first tranche of the option by making a cash payment of $250,000 to the Company and has acquired from the Company a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.  As a result of Colt exercising the first tranche of the option, thus increasing its undivided interest to 67% in the Extra High Property, Colt has become the operator of the Extra High Property.

In order to exercise the second tranche of the option, Colt was required to make a cash payment of $250,000 to the Company on or before December 31, 2008.  As of December 31, 2008, Colt did not exercise the second tranche of the option.  As a result Colt now holds a 67% undivided interest in the Extra High Property and the Company holds a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.  Pursuant to the Joint Venture which the Company and Colt have formed, each party shall henceforth contribute its proportionate share of property related expenditures.  If any party fails to contribute its share of future property related expenditures, then its interest will be diluted on a straight-line basis.  If any party’s interest is diluted to less than 10%, then that party’s interest in the Extra High Property will be converted into a 0.5% net smelter returns royalty.

- 12 -

As at December 31, 2008, Colt has made option payments totaling $443,770 to the Company.

As at December 31, 2008, the Company held a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.

As at December 31, 2009, the Company’s investment in the Extra High Property consists of costs incurred as follows:

2009

2008

2007

Cumulative to 2009

Acquisition (property option payments)

Staking

Assessment and miscellaneous

Geological, geochemical, trenching and drilling

Colt property option payments

As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company holds a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.

Exploration for natural resources involves many risks, which even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome.  It is quite possible that Kokomo might lose all its investment in the Extra High Property and might have to write-off, in its entirety, Kokomo’s investment in the Extra High Property.

It should be noted that there are no assurances whatsoever that commercial quantities of minerals can be discovered on the Extra High Property, or, if discovered, that they can be developed or placed into commercial production.

Legal Description of Property.

The British Columbia Government’s Mineral Titles Branch has recently introduced a Mineral Titles Conversion Program whereby Mineral Property owners are being encouraged to convert their old tenure claims to new tenures. As a result, Kokomo has converted all of its old Extra High mineral property tenures to the following new Extra High mineral property tenures and which are more particularly described as follows:-

The Extra High Property, consisting of a total area of approximately 1,074 hectares, is located on Samatosum Mountain, immediately south of the formerly producing Samatosum Mine, 60 km northeast of Kamloops, British Columbia.

II.

Mt. Blunt Property (formerly known as Blunt Mountain Property) Omineca Mining Division, British Columbia, Canada

During 2006, the Company staked 22 mineral tenures totaling 9,934.522 hectares located in the Omineca Mining Division of British Columbia (the “Blunt Mountain Property”) for an acquisition cost of $3,974 and spent $2,134 in exploration related expenses for a total amount of $6,108.

The original Blunt Mountain property that had been acquired in 2006 was allowed to lapse on the anniversary dates in April and May of 2007.  A decision was made to re-stake a portion of the original property which was named Mt. Blunt and was acquired for a total cost of $1,322.

During the summer of 2007, J.W. Murton conducted an evaluation, mapping and sampling of the Mt. Blunt property for a total cost of $9,320.  Rock samples were collected and submitted for analysis.  Results from the analytical work did not reveal sufficient metal values to make the Mt. Blunt property worthy of further work, as a result of which, J.W. Murton recommended that the Company allow the Mt. Blunt property to lapse.  At December 31, 2007, the Company decided to abandon the property and has written off its investment in this property.

III.

The Whiteman Property, Vernon Mining Division, British Columbia, Canada

The Whiteman Property consisted of 5 Mineral Tenures totaling 1,736.825 hectares located on Whiteman Creek in the Vernon Mining Division, 25 km south west from Vernon British Columbia.  The acquisition cost for the Whiteman property was $695 and the Company spent $4,162 in exploration related expenses for a total amount of $4,857.  During the year ended December 31, 2006, this amount was written off.  The Company followed up with Mr. J. W. Murton’s recommendation and allowed the claims to lapse on May 12, 2007.

IV.

Lithium Properties, Ontario, Canada

On July 31, 2008 the Company entered into a Property Purchase Agreement (“the Agreement”) with an arm’s length party in respect to all of the Company’s Lithium properties located in Ontario whereby the Company has sold all of its Lithium properties to the arm’s length party.  As consideration, the arm’s length party paid to the Company $50,000 cash and issued to the Company 25,000 fully paid non-assessable common shares of a publicly listed company.  And, pursuant to the Agreement, the arm’s length party is obligated to pay to the Company one-half percent (1/2%) gross receipts royalty after six months from the date of commencement of commercial production from the Lithium properties.   At the end of fiscal year 2000, the Company had written-off these properties.

- 14 -

V.

Hope Creek Property, British Columbia, Canada

On October 24, 2008, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.13 – Incorporated by reference) with two individuals, who are at arm’s length to the Company, in respect to certain mineral claims which are situated in the Lillooet Mining Division in British Columbia (the “Hope Creek Property”). Pursuant to the terms of the Option Agreement, the Company obtained the right to acquire a 100% undivided interest in the Hope Creek Property, subject to a 1% NSR royalty, by issuing 2,000 common shares, making staged cash payments totaling $90,000 over three years, incurring not less than $50,000 in exploration expenditures on the Hope Creek Property by December 31, 2008 and incurring additional optional exploration expenditures totaling $250,000 over a period of three years.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company fulfilled its commitment and issued 2,000 common shares and incurred $68,654 in exploration expenditures by December 31, 2008. The $90,000 staged cash payments are optional and are payable as follows: (i) $15,000 on or before December 31, 2009; (ii) $25,000 on or before December 31, 2010; and (iii) $50,000 on or before December 31, 2011.

The Company qualified for the BC Mineral Exploration Tax Credit in the amount of $1,060 in 2009 and $7,178 in 2008 for exploration expenses incurred on the Hope Creek Property. These amounts have been credited against expenses incurred on this property.

The Company conducted a diamond drilling program as of October 28, 2008 on the Company’s optioned Hope Creek Property.

The diamond drilling program was targeted at disseminated and shear hosted mineralization in a complex acid to intermediate phase volcanogenic environment. Earlier work by the property owners had indicated zinc mineralization in a shear structure and related copper/zinc soil geochemical anomalies in the areas sampled.  Three diamond drill holes were completed in the program.

All diamond drill core samples were split using a mechanical sample splitter for the NQ core with ½ the core sample stored and marked in the core box in secure storage with the remaining ½ core sample shipped to EcoTech Laboratories Ltd. in Kamloops, B.C. Canada. All gold results were by fire assay using industry standard methods and all samples were also analyzed using ICP methods.  All ICP results for base metals greater than 10,000 ppm were further analysed using industry standard assay procedures.

The diamond drilling program was conducted by and was under the direct supervision of J.W. Murton, P. Eng., a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.  At the time, J.W. Murton was a director of the Company.

As the results obtained from the diamond drilling program did not meet the Company’s expectations, on October 14, 2009, the Company formally terminated the Option Agreement dated October 24, 2008 in respect to the Hope Creek Property and has written it off.

VI.

Securities of a related company

During 2007, the Company owned 7,564,006 shares in the capital of Las Vegas From Home.com Entertainment Inc. (“Las Vegas”), a related company.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company sold, through the facilities of the TSX Venture Exchange, the Company’s marketable securities of 7,564,000 shares in the capital of Las Vegas for total proceeds of $431,371 which had a total acquisition cost of $2,483,113.  Of the realized loss on disposition, $1,058,892 has been reflected in 2006 and the remainder has been reflected in 2008.

- 15 -

During 2005, the Company entered into a Private Placement Financing Agreement with Colt, a formerly related company.  The Company purchased 1,000,000 common shares in the capital of Colt at $0.01 per share for a total purchase price of $10,000. During 2006, the Company entered into a Private Placement Financing Agreement with Colt whereby the Company purchased 1,500,000 common shares in the capital of Colt at $0.01 per share for a total purchase price of $15,000.   The shares of Colt began trading on the CNSX on March 1, 2007 and during 2007 the Company sold all of its marketable securities of 2,500,000 in the capital of Colt for total gross proceeds to the Company of $125,000.

Item. 5.A.  Results of Operations

Selected annual information from the audited financial statements for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is shown in the following table:

Note : All common shares and per share amounts included in the above table  for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 have been restated to give retroactive effect to the 25:1 consolidation described in Information on the Company under Item 4.  of this Annual Report.

All financial figures presented herein are expressed in Canadian Dollars (CDN$) unless otherwise specified.

For the year ended December 31, 2009:-

·

The Company’s operating expenses were $484,131 as compared to $523,257 during the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to $790,303 during the corresponding period in 2007.  Items which mainly contributed to the reduction in operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2009 were Legal, accounting and audit, Office and miscellaneous, Finance, interest and foreign exchange, and Telephone, travel, meals and entertainment.

- 16 -

·

The Company realized a loss of $2,101 as compared to a loss of $1,043,609 on the sale of its marketable securities during the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to a gain of $109,454 during the corresponding period of 2007.

·

The Company recorded a net loss of $550,218 as compared to a net loss of $1,511,761 during the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to a net loss of $676,166 during the corresponding period of 2007.

·

The basic and diluted loss per common share was $0.15 as compared to a basic and diluted loss per common share of $1.38 during the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to a basic and diluted loss per common share of $0.73 during the corresponding period in 2007.

·

The Company’s total assets were $162,205 as compared to $244,894 during the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to $1,476,545 during the corresponding period in 2007.

·

The Company had a working capital deficiency of $40,613 as compared to a working capital deficiency of $81,578 during the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to a working capital of $772,764 for the corresponding period in 2007.

·

The Company’s weighted average number of common shares outstanding was 3,776,899 as compared to 1,093,301 during the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to 927,406 for the corresponding period in 2007.

On March 3, 2010, the Company announced that it will enter into non-brokered Private Placement Financing Agreements with certain investors, including officers and directors of the Company (the “Subscribers”) whereby the Subscribers will purchase up to 4,500,000 Units of the securities of the Company at the price of $0.06 per Unit for total proceeds to the Company of up to $270,000. Each Unit shall consist of one common share in the capital of the Company and one warrant to purchase an additional common share in the capital of the Company at $0.10 per common share for a period of two years from closing date.  In connection with this non-brokered private placement financing, the Company has closed the first and second tranches on March 11, 2010 and April 16, 2010, respectively, and has issued, in aggregate, 2,000,000 Units in the capital of the Company.  All securities issued are subject to a hold period which expire on July 12, 2010 in respect to the first tranche and August 17, 2010 in respect to the second tranche.

During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 7,325,333 units in the securities of the Company to various investors for total proceeds to the Company of $518,150.  Each Unit consists of one common share in the capital of the Company and one warrant to purchase an additional common share in the capital of the Company.  Of the 7,325,333 units sold, 5,242,000 share purchase warrants entitle the holders to purchase one common share at a price of $0.10 for a period of two years from closing date, and the remaining 2,083,333 share purchase warrants entitle the holders to purchase one common share at a price of $0.10 for a period of five years from closing date,   As at December 31, 2009, all of the 7,325,333 share purchase warrants remain unexercised.  All securities issued were subject to a four month hold period.

The Company finances its exploration programs through the issuance of flow-through common shares.  Income tax deductions relating to these expenditures are claimable only by the investors.  Proceeds from common shares issued pursuant to flow-through financings are credited to capital stock.

During 2008, the Company issued 2,000 common shares to an arm’s length party at a market value of $0.75 per common share for a total value of $1,500 in accordance with the Hope Creek Property Option Agreement.

During 2007, the Company entered into Private Placement Agreements to sell an aggregate of 120,000 units in the securities of the Company at a price of US $1.25 per unit for total proceeds to the Company of US $150,000 (Cdn $155,945). Each unit consisted of one common share and one non-transferable share purchase warrant, which entitled the holder to purchase one common share at a price of US $2.50 for a period of one year from the closing date. The Company paid finders’ fees to an arm’s length third party in the sum of US $15,000 (Cdn $15,320) in connection with these Private Placement Agreements.  During 2008, all of the 120,000 share purchase warrants expired unexercised.

- 17 -

During 2007, the Company entered into Private Placement Flow-Through Financing Agreements with two directors, for the purchase of 48,000 flow-through share units in the securities of the Company at the purchase price of $1.25 per unit for total proceeds to the Company of $60,000. Each unit consisted of common shares (the “flow-through shares”) of the Company that will be a “flow-through share” pursuant to the provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “ITA”) and one non-transferable common share purchase warrant, which entitled the holder to purchase one common share  at a price of $1.25 per flow-through warrant share until December 31, 2008. As at December 31, 2008, all 48,000 share purchase warrants expired unexercised.

The Company’s Board of Directors resolved effective as of July 1, 2005, to remunerate two independent directors for an aggregate monthly amount of $2,501 plus GST.  Effective June 30, 2007, the Company and the two directors agreed to terminate the aforementioned arrangement. As of June 30, 2007, an aggregate amount of $37,166 in directors’ fees remained payable to the two directors (the “Debt”).  The two directors and the Company entered into respective Share for Debt Settlement Agreements on July 12, 2007 and the Company issued an aggregate of 29,733 common shares at the fair market value price of $1.25 per share as full and final settlement of the Debt.

During 2006, the Company issued 48,000 flow-through share units in the securities of the Company to two individuals, one of which is a director of the Company, at the price of $1.25 per unit for total proceeds to the Company of $60,000.  Each unit consisted of one flow-through share and one flow-through common share purchase warrant, which entitled the holder to purchase one common share at a price of $1.25 per share until December 31, 2007.  During 2007, 16,000 of the flow-through share warrants were exercised at $1.25 per flow-through share for total proceeds to the Company of $20,000 and the remaining unexercised balance of 32,000 flow-through share warrants expired.

The Board of Directors of the Company resolved to adopt on April 12, 2004, the 2004 Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 10.7 - Incorporated by reference) which provides for the granting of incentive stock options to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company entitling them to purchase up to 20% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company as of the day of granting. Shareholders subsequently approved the 2004 Stock Option Plan at the Company’s Annual General Meeting which was held on April 30, 2004.  The 2004 Stock Option Plan replaces the Company’s 2002 and 2003 Stock Option Plans (See Exhibit 10.1 – Incorporated by reference).  The 2004 Stock Option Plan was re-approved by the Shareholders at the Company’s Annual General Meeting held on June 18, 2009.

The material terms of the 2004 Stock Option Plan are outlined in the Company’s Information Circular included with the 2010 Notice of Annual General Meeting ( see Exhibit 18* - Attached herewith ) which has been filed on Sedar .

Effective January 2004, the Company adopted the new requirements of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”) Handbook Section 3870, which requires an expense to be recognized in the financial statements for all forms of employee stock-based compensation, including stock options.  Options granted are accounted for using the fair value method where compensation expense is calculated using the Black-Scholes options pricing model.

At the Company’s 2005 Special General Meeting held on January 10, 2005, the shareholders approved the deletion of the Pre-Existing Company Provisions in the notice of Articles of the Company and approved the alteration of the Company’s Notice of Articles.  The shareholders approved the increase of the Company's authorized capital to an unlimited number of Common and Preferred Shares, both without par value, approved the adoption of new articles in substitution for the old articles of the Company (Exhibit 3.2 - Incorporated by reference). In addition, the shareholders approved the consolidation of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company on the basis of 35 common shares before consolidation to 1 common share after consolidation and approved changing the name of the Company to Bronx Ventures Inc.  All material terms are provided in greater detail in the Company’s Notice of Special General Meeting and Information circular dated November 29, 2004 (Exhibit 20.4 – Incorporated by reference).

- 18 -

On April 16, 2009, the Company changed its name from Zab Resources Inc. to Kokomo Enterprises Inc. and its share capital was consolidated on the basis of 25 (old) shares for 1 (new) share basis. ( Exhibit 3.4 - Incorporated by reference).  As a result, the shares of Kokomo commenced trading in Canada on the CNSX under the symbol “KKO”, and in the U.S.A. the shares of Kokomo commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “KKOEF”.  The Cusip number of the Company’s common shares is 500323100.

At the Annual General Meeting of the Company’s shareholders which was held on June 18, 2009, the shareholders received the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the Auditor’s Report thereon; fixed the number of Directors for the ensuing year at four; elected Bedo H. Kalpakian, Jacob H. Kalpakian, J. Wayne Murton and Gregory T. McFarlane as Directors of the Company; re-appointed the Company’s Auditor, Smythe Ratcliffe, Chartered Accountants, for the ensuing year and authorized the Directors to fix the remuneration to be paid to the Auditor and, re-approved the Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan.  On December 7, 2009, J. Wayne Murton resigned from his position as a director of the Company.  In order to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of J. Wayne Murton, Mr. Fred A.C. Tejada was appointed as a director of the Company on December 18, 2009.

Disclosure of the differences between accounting principles and practices generally accepted in Canada and those generally accepted in the United States and required by the SEC, are included in Note 13 of the financial statements included in Item 17 of the Annual Report.

On February 8, 2010, the Company entered into a binding letter of intent (“LOI”) with an arm’s length party to acquire a 75% right, title and interest in the surface rights of the Zaniza Iron Ore Property which covers an area of approximately 153 square kilometers and is located in the Municipality of Sola De Vega in the State of Oaxaca in Mexico ( see Exhibit 10.21* – Attached herewith ).  The parties to the LOI have agreed to enter into a Definitive Agreement which will be subject to the approvals of the CNSX, the Board of Directors of the Company, and if required by the CNSX, the approval of the shareholders of the Company.  The consideration payable by the Company to the arm’s length party shall be a cash payment of US $100,000 upon the execution of the Definitive Agreement, and the issuance of a Convertible Debenture for the amount of US $900,000, which will have a maturity of 4 years, shall bear simple interest at an annual rate of 5%, and may be converted into Kokomo shares at the price of US $0.10 per share in year one, US $0.25 per share in year two, US $0.50 per share in year three and US $1.00 per share in year four.  There are no assurances whatsoever that this contemplated transaction shall be consummated.

During the three months period ended March 31, 2010, the Company had a net loss of $109,169 or $0.01 per share as compared to a net loss of $111,608 or $0.10 per share for the same three months period ended March 31, 2009 as compared to a net loss of $139,647 or $0.13 per share for the same three months period ended March 31, 2008.

Operating costs remained relatively unchanged to $109,169 as compared to $109,539 for the same period in 2009 as compared to $119,925 for the same period in 2008.

During the three months period ended March 31, 2010, the Company’s weighted average number of common shares were 9,507,778 as compared to 1,094,945 for the corresponding period in 2009 and as compared to 1,092,945 for the corresponding period in 2008.

- 19 -

Summary of Quarterly Results

Note: Earnings (loss) per common share calculations have been restated to give retroactive effect to the 25:1 consolidation described in the Information on the Company under Item 4.  of this Annual Report.

The diluted loss per share calculations are not reflected as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The Company’s business is not of a seasonal nature.

The Company is presently not a party to any legal proceedings whatsoever.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has incurred significant operating losses over the past three fiscal years, has limited resources, and no sources of operating cash flow.

During 2010, the Company shall require at least $500,000 so as to conduct its operations uninterruptedly.  In order to meet this requirement, the Company intends to seek equity and/or debt financings through private placements and/or public offerings and/or loans.  In the past, the Company has been successful in securing equity and debt financings in order to conduct its operations uninterruptedly.  While the Company does not give any assurances whatsoever that in the future it will continue being successful in securing equity and/or debt financings in order to conduct its operations uninterruptedly, it is the Company’s intention to pursue these methods for future funding of the Company.

Pursuant to the Option Agreement dated September 8, 2006, as amended (Exhibit 10.11 – Incorporated by reference), with Colt, the Company has received $193,770 as of December 31, 2007.

- 20 -

On January 21, 2008, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (the “2008 Option Agreement”) ( Exhibit 10.11.3 - Incorporated by reference) with Colt whereby Colt was granted the right and option to acquire, in two separate equal tranches, the Company’s 66% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.  Pursuant to the 2008 Option Agreement, Colt has exercised the first tranche of the option by making a cash payment of $250,000 to the Company and has acquired from the Company a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.  However, Colt did not exercise the second tranche of the option.  As a result of exercising the first tranche of the option, Colt now holds a 67% undivided interest in the Extra High Property and has become the operator of the Extra High Property and the Company now owns a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.

On March 3, 2010, the Company announced that it will enter into non-brokered Private Placement Financing Agreements with certain investors, including officers and directors of the Company (the “Subscribers”) whereby the Subscribers will purchase up to 4,500,000 Units of the securities of the Company at the price of $0.06 per Unit for total proceeds to the Company of up to $270,000. Each Unit shall consist of one common share in the capital of the Company and one warrant to purchase an additional common share in the capital of the Company at $0.10 per common share for a period of two years from closing date.  In connection with this non-brokered private placement financing, the Company has closed the first and second tranches on March 11, 2010 and April 16, 2010, respectively, and has issued, in aggregate, 2,000,000 Units in the capital of the Company.  All securities issued are subject to a hold period which expire on July 12, 2010 in respect to the first tranche and August 17, 2010 in respect to the second tranche.

During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 7,325,333 units in the securities of the Company to various investors for total proceeds to the Company of $518,150.  Each Unit consists of one common share in the capital of the Company and one warrant to purchase an additional common share in the capital of the Company.  Of the 7,325,333 units sold, 5,242,000 share purchase warrants entitle the holders to purchase one common share at a price of $0.10 for a period of two years from closing date, and the remaining 2,083,333 share purchase warrants entitle the holders to purchase one common share at a price of $0.10 for a period of five years from closing date. As at December 31, 2009, all of the 7,325,333 share purchase warrants remain unexercised.  All securities issued were subject to a four month hold period.

Funds raised through the issuance of flow-through shares are required to be expended on qualified Canadian mineral exploration expenditures, as defined pursuant to Canadian income tax legislation.  As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has expended on its Canadian mineral properties all funds received by the Company through the issuance of flow-through common shares.

During 2008, the Company issued to arm’s length parties 2,000 common shares at a market value of $0.75 per common share for a total value of $1,500 in accordance with the Hope Creek Property Option Agreement.

During 2007, the Company entered into Private Placement Agreements to sell an aggregate of 120,000 units in the securities of the Company at a price of US $1.25 per unit for total proceeds to the Company of US $150,000 (Cdn $155,945). Each unit consisted of one common share and one non-transferable share purchase warrant, which entitled the holder to purchase one common share at a price of US $2.50 for a period of one year from the closing date. The Company paid finders’ fees to an arm’s length third party in the sum of US $15,000 (Cdn $15,320) in connection with these Private Placement Agreements.  As at December 31, 2008, all of the 120,000 share purchase warrants expired unexercised.

During 2007, the Company entered into Private Placement Flow-Through Financing Agreements with two directors, for the purchase of 48,000 flow-through share units in the securities of the Company at the purchase price of $1.25 per unit for total proceeds to the Company of $60,000. Each unit consisted of common shares (the “flow-through shares”) of the Company that will be a “flow-through share” pursuant to the provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “ITA”) and one non-transferable common share purchase warrant, which entitled the holder to purchase one common share  at a price of $1.25 per flow-through warrant share until December 31, 2008. As at December 31, 2008, all 48,000 share purchase warrants expired unexercised.

- 21 -

The Company’s Board of Directors resolved effective as of July 1, 2005, to remunerate two independent directors for an aggregate monthly amount of $2,501 plus GST.  Effective June 30, 2007, the Company and the two directors agreed to terminate the aforementioned arrangement. As of June 30, 2007, an aggregate amount of $37,166 in directors’ fees remained payable to the two directors (the “Debt”).  The two directors and the Company entered into respective Share for Debt Settlement Agreements on July 12, 2007 and the Company issued an aggregate of 29,733 common shares at the fair market value price of $1.25 per share as full and final settlement of the Debt.

As at December 31, 2009, an aggregate of 7,325,333 warrants were outstanding.  One warrant is required to purchase one common share at an exercise price of $0.10.  If any warrants are exercised in the future, then any funds received by the Company from the exercising of warrants shall be used for general working capital purposes.  However, there are no assurances whatsoever that any warrants will be exercised before their expiry.  As at December 31, 2009, there were no warrants exercised.  Subsequent to the year-ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued, in aggregate, 2,000,000 share purchase warrants with an exercise price of $0.10 per share purchase warrant.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, there were no stock option granted to Directors, Officers, Employees and Consultants.  As at December 31, 2009, there are 178,242 stock options outstanding (2008: 178,242) (2007: 178,242) which have been granted to Directors, Officers, Employees and Consultants which expire on June 15, 2011 and are exercisable at Cdn $1.25 per common share.  If any stock options are exercised in the future, then any funds received by the Company from the exercising of stock options shall be used for general working capital purposes.  However, there are no assurances whatsoever that any stock options will be exercised before their expiry.  As at December 31, 2009, there were no stock options exercised.  On March 8, 2010, a total of 10,000 stock options have been forfeited as a result of the resignation of J. Wayne Murton from the Company’s Board.

As at December 31, 2009, the Company had $5,158 in cash as compared to $3,357 for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $18,461 for the year ended December 31, 2007.  Marketable securities as at December 31, 2009 were $0 as compared to $3,250 for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $983,321 for the year ended December 31, 2007.  GST receivable as at December 31, 2009 were $4,910 as compared to $8,250 for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $14,672 for the year ended December 31, 2007.  Mineral exploration tax credit receivable as at December 31, 2009 was $1,060 as compared to $7,178 for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $Nil for the year ended December 31, 2007.

As at December 31, 2009, the Company’s total assets were $162,205 as compared to $244,894 for the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to $1,476,545 for the corresponding period in 2007.  The Company’s total liabilities were $51,741 as compared to $103,613 for the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to $315,412 for the corresponding period in 2007.

As at December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a net loss of $550,218 as compared to a net loss of $1,511,761 for the corresponding period in 2008 and as compared to a net loss of $676,166 during the corresponding period of 2007.

For the three months ended March 31, 2010:-

·

The Company’s operating expenses were $109,169 as compared to $109,539 for the corresponding period in 2009 as compared to $119,925 for the corresponding period in 2008.

·

The Company realized a net loss of $109,169 as compared to a net loss of $111,608 for the corresponding period in 2009 as compared to a net loss of $139,647 for the corresponding period in 2008.

- 22 -

·

The Company’s total assets were $164,427 as compared to $261,317 for the corresponding period in 2009 as compared to $1,058,035 for the corresponding period in 2008.

·

The Company’s total liabilities were $52,132 as compared to $230,393 for the corresponding period in 2009 as compared to $74,689 for the corresponding period in 2008.

·

The Company had a working capital deficiency of $38,782 as compared to a working capital deficiency of $217,475 as compared to a working capital of $825,284.

The Company does not have a research and development department nor does it have any patents or licenses.

Commodity prices have recently improved, and should this trend continue then companies such as Kokomo will have difficulty in acquiring mineral properties of merit at reasonable prices.

The Company has no off balance sheet arrangements whatsoever and the Company’s financial information including its balance sheet and statement of operations and deficit have been fairly represented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company has no Short and Long Term Debt Obligations, Capital Lease Obligations, Purchase Lease Obligations, or Other Long Term Liabilities reflected on the Company’s Balance Sheet.

In respect to information covered by Items 5.E. and 5.F., all financial information and statements have been fairly represented in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

Special Note regarding Forward-Looking Statements

We make certain forward looking-statements in this Form 20-F within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to our financial condition, profitability, liquidity, resources, business outlook, proposed acquisitions, market forces, corporate strategies, contractual commitments, capital requirements and other matters.  The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbour for forward-looking statements.  To comply with the terms of the safe harbour, we note that a variety of factors could cause our actual results and experience to differ substantially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements.  When words and expressions such as: “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “plans,”  “intends,” “objectives,” “goals,” “aims,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “possible,” “seeks,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “might,” “likely,” “enable” or similar words or expressions are used in this Form 20-F, as well as statements containing phrases such as “in our view,” “there can be no assurances,” “although no assurances can be given,” or “there is no way to anticipate with certainty,” forward-looking statements are being made.  These forward-looking statements speak as of the date of this Form 20-F.

- 23 -

The forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risk and uncertainties.  These risks and uncertainties may affect the operation, performance, development and results of our business and could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in our forward-looking statements.  These statements are based on our current beliefs as to the outcome projected or implied in the forward-looking statements.  Furthermore, some forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions of future events which may not prove to be accurate.  The forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties referred to in “Item 3.D. RISK FACTORS,” and elsewhere within the document and in other of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all such risk factors which can cause actual results to differ significantly from those forecast in any forward-looking statements.  Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not overly rely or attach undue weight to forward-looking statements as an indication of our actual future results.

As of May 31, 2010, the name, municipality of residence and the principal occupation of the directors and officers of the Company are the following:

*Members of the Company’s audit committee.

(1) As a result of the resignation of the Company’s former director namely J. Wayne Murton on December 7, 2009, Fred A.C. Tejada joined the Company’s Board of Directors on December 18, 2009.

- 24 -

Jacob H. Kalpakian is the nephew of Bedo H. Kalpakian.  All directors serve for a term of one year until the next annual general meeting or until the date of their resignation, whichever occurs first.

There are no arrangements or understandings whatsoever with major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or member of senior management.

Certain directors, officers and employees of the Company are covered under a group medical and dental insurance plan.  Presently there exists no plan regarding directors' and officers' pension, retirement or other similar benefits.  Furthermore, there are no amounts set aside or accrued by the Company to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits.

The Company’s Board of Directors resolved effective as of July 1, 2005, to remunerate two independent Directors for an aggregate monthly amount of $2,501 plus G.S.T.  Pursuant to the resolution, both independent Directors, namely Mr. J. W. Murton and Mr. Gregory T. McFarlane, each received a monthly remuneration of $1,667 plus G.S.T. and $834 respectively.  Effective as of June 30, 2007, the Company and the two Directors agreed to terminate the aforementioned arrangement. As of June 30, 2007 an aggregate amount of $37,166 in directors’ fees remained payable to the two Directors (the “Debt”).  The two Directors and the Company entered into respective Share for Debt Settlement Agreements on July 12, 2007 (Exhibit 10.9.1 - Incorporated by reference) and the Company issued an aggregate of 29,733 common shares at the fair market value price of $1.25 per share as full and final settlement of the Debt.

In the past, the Company hired the services of J.W. Murton & Associates to provide geological services.  J.W. Murton & Associates is a private company owned by a former director of the Company.  For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009, J. W. Murton & Associates has provided geological services to the Company in the amount of  $4,317 (2008: $68,444) (2007: $33,797) plus G.S.T.

Management Services Agreement between the Company, Bedo H. Kalpakian, Jacob H. Kalpakian and Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., a company related by common directors, dated November 1, 2001 as amended on August 18, 2003 and on July 31, 2005, by resolutions of the Directors of Kokomo, (the “Management Services Agreement”) (Exhibit 10.4 - Incorporated by reference).  Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement dated November 1, 2001, as amended by the Addendum to the Management Services Agreement dated July 31, 2005 (Exhibit 10.41 - Incorporated by reference) the aggregate amount of payments made for Management Fees totaled $360,000 during the year ended December 31, 2009, (2008: $360,000) (2007: $360,000) and was paid to Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd, (the “Manager”) the principals of which are Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian, both of whom are directors of the Company.  The Management Services Agreement expires in October, 2010 and is renewable on an annual basis and may be terminated by either party by giving three months notice in writing.  The Company reimburses Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., for all travelling and other expenses incurred on behalf of the Company by Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd.  The aggregate amount of payments made for Management Fees totaled $90,000 during the three month period ended March 31, 2010, (March 31, 2009: $90,000) (March 31, 2008: $90,000).

- 25 -

Pursuant to indemnity agreements dated April 1, 1993, January 7, 2008 and December 18, 2009, between the Company and each of Bedo H. Kalpakian, Jacob H. Kalpakian, Gregory T. McFarlane,  Maria P. Arenas and Fred A.C. Tejada (collectively "the directors and officers"), the Company agreed to indemnify and save the directors and officers, their heirs and personal representatives harmless from and against all costs, charges and expenses arising out of their association with the Registrant.  These costs, charges and expenses include any amounts paid to settle an action or to satisfy a judgement brought or found against the directors and/or officers and any amounts paid to settle an administrative action or proceeding provided that the indemnified party has acted in good faith and in the best interests of the Company.  The Company Act requires a Court Order to be obtained prior to the Company making payment under the indemnity agreements.  To date, the Company has not made any payments under the indemnity agreements.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, and up to and including the date of this Annual Report no incentive stock options were exercised by any of the Company’s directors or officers.  As of the date of this Annual Report, there are 168,242 incentive stock options outstanding granted to directors and officers.

The Company has no long term incentive plans in place and, has not granted any stock appreciation rights.

6.C.1.  Directors’ Terms of service.

All directors are elected annually by the Company’s shareholders to serve for a term of one year until the next annual general meeting of the shareholders.  All directors may be annually re-elected by the Company’s shareholders at the annual general meeting of the shareholders for additional one year terms.  Bedo H. Kalpakian has served as a director since 1984; Jacob H. Kalpakian has served as a director since 1991; Gregory T. McFarlane has served as a director since 1992 and Fred A.C. Tejada has served as a director since December 2009.

6.C.2.  Details of Directors’ Service Contracts.

Management Services Agreement between the Company, Bedo H. Kalpakian, Jacob H. Kalpakian and Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., a private company which is owned by Bedo and Jacob Kalpakian, dated November 1, 2001 as amended on August 18, 2003 and on July 31, 2005, by resolutions of the Directors of the Company, (the “Management Services Agreement”) (Exhibit 10.4 - Incorporated by reference).   Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement dated November 1, 2001, as amended by the Addendum to the Management Services Agreement dated July 31, 2005 (Exhibit 10.41 - Incorporated by reference) the aggregate amount of payments made for Management Fees totaled $360,000 during the year ended December 31, 2009, (2008: $360,000) (2007: $360,000) and was paid to Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd, (the “Manager”).  The Management Services Agreement expires in October, 2010 and is renewable on an annual basis and may be terminated at anytime by either party on three months written notice.  The Company reimburses Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., for all travelling and other expenses incurred on behalf of the Company by Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2010, the Company has paid $90,000 (March 31, 2009: $90,000) (March 31, 2008: $90,000) to Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., in respect to Management fees.

6.C.3.  Details relating to the Company’s audit committee and remuneration committee.

All directors are elected annually by the Company’s shareholders to act as directors of the Company for a term of one year.  The Company’s audit committee is appointed on an annual basis by the Company’s directors.  Presently, the Company’s audit committee consists of the following directors; Bedo H. Kalpakian, Gregory T. McFarlane and Fred A.C. Tejada.  The majority of the members of the audit committee must be made up of directors who are not officers of the Company.    The audit committee is also responsible to monitor compliance of the Company’s Code of Ethics (see item 16.B).

- 26 -

Pursuant to Canadian National Policy (52-110) with respect to Audit Committee Disclosure, the charter of the Company’s Audit Committee and other information required to be disclosed have been disclosed in the Company’s Annual Information Circular with respect to the Company’s Annual Shareholder’s meeting which is scheduled to take place on June 4, 2010.  The Information Circular (see Exhibit 18* – Attached herewith) includes the Company’s Audit Committee Disclosure under Form 52-110F2.

The Company does not have a remuneration committee or an executive committee largely due to its size.

The Company employs 2 individuals in Management.

The Company’s employees are not represented by a union or other collective bargaining organization and the Company has not experienced any work stoppage by its employees.  The Company believes that its employee relations are good.

The number of common shares beneficially owned (directly and indirectly) by officers and directors of the Company as of May 31, 2010 are as follows:

Notes :*

Based on 10,920,278 issued and outstanding common shares as of May 31, 2010

(1)

Of these common shares, 3,267,133 are held by Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., 270,000 are held by BHK Management Inc. and 153,000 are held by a family member.

(2)

Of these common shares, 3,267,133 are held by Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., 270,000 are held by 30 Rock Management Inc. and 224,000

are  held by a family member.

(3)    Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd.,.is a private company controlled by and in which Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian are the principal

shareholders.

(4)    BHK Management Inc. is a private company controlled by Bedo H. Kalpakian.

(5)    30 Rock Management Inc. is a private company controlled by Jacob H. Kalpakian.

The number of common shares beneficially owned (directly and indirectly) by officers and directors of the Company as of May 31, 2009, are as follows:

- 27 -

Notes :*

Based on 1,094,945 issued and outstanding common shares as of May 31, 2009

(1)

Of these common shares, 49,800 are held by Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., a private company of which Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian are the principal shareholders with equal ownership. (i.e. 24,900 shares each)

The number of common shares beneficially owned (directly and indirectly) by officers and directors of the Company as of May 31, 2008, are as follows

Notes :*

Based on 1,092,945 issued and outstanding common shares as of May 31, 2008

(1)

Of these common shares, 58,760 are held by Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., a private company of which Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian are the principal shareholders with equal ownership. (i.e. 29,380 shares each)

From time to time the Company grants Incentive Stock Options to its directors, officers, employees and consultants.  The incentive stock options entitle the holders to acquire common shares of the Company from treasury.  The incentive stock options are a means of rewarding future services provided to the Company and are not intended as a substitute for salaries or wages, or as a means of compensation for past services rendered.

At the Company’s Annual General Meeting of shareholders held on April 30, 2004, the shareholders of the Company approved the Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 10.7 - Incorporated by reference). Shareholders of the Company re-approved the 2004 Stock Option Plan at the Company’s Annual General Meeting which took place on June 18, 2009.  Furthermore, the Shareholders of the Company will be asked to re-approve the 2004 Stock Option Plan at the Company’s Annual General Meeting which is scheduled to take place on June 4, 2010 ( see Exhibit 18*-Attached herewith ).

The Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan reserves for granting to directors, officers, employees and consultants up to 20% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company calculated from time to time on a rolling basis.  The terms of the options are determined at the date of grant.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, there were no stock options granted.  As at December 31, 2009, there were 178,242 stock options outstanding and exercisable at a price of $1.25 per share which were granted to Directors, Officers, Employees and Consultants on June 15, 2007 and which have a term of 4 years.  If any stock options are exercised in the future, then any funds received by the Company from the exercising of stock options shall be used for general working capital purposes.  However, there are no assurances whatsoever that any stock options will be exercised before their expiry.  On March 8, 2010,   10,000 stock options were forfeited as a result of the resignation of a former director namely J. Wayne Murton.  As of May 31, 2010, there were no stock options exercised.

- 28 -

7.A.1. The Company is a publicly-owned corporation, the common shares of which are owned by Canadian residents, U.S. residents, and residents of other countries.  The Company is neither directly nor indirectly owned nor controlled by any other corporation or any foreign government.  All shares in the following tables have been re-stated to give retroactive effect to the Company’s 25:1 share consolidation on April 16, 2009.

As at May 31, 2010, the following persons or corporations beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control over shares carrying more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company:

(1)

Of these shares, 428,752 common shares are held by Bedo H. Kalpakian directly, 468,920 common shares are held by Jacob H. Kalpakian directly, 3,807,133 common shares are held by private companies which are controlled by and in which Bedo H. Kalpakian and/or Jacob H. Kalpakian are the principal shareholders and 377,000 common shares are held by family members of Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian.

* Based on 10,920,278 issued and outstanding common shares as of May 31, 2010 .

As at May 31, 2009, the following persons or corporations beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control over shares carrying more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company:

(1)

Of these shares, 256,752 common shares are held by Bedo H. Kalpakian directly, 224,920 common shares are held by Jacob H. Kalpakian directly and, 49,800 common shares are held by Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., a private company of which Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian are the principal shareholders.

* Based on 1,094,945 issued and outstanding common shares as of May 31, 2009 .

As at May 31, 2008, the following persons or corporations beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control over shares carrying more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company:

(1)

Of these shares, 258,592 common shares are held by Bedo H. Kalpakian directly, 224,921 common shares are held by Jacob H. Kalpakian directly and, 58,760 common shares are held by Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., a private company of which Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian are the principal shareholders.

* Based on 1,092,945 issued and outstanding common shares as of May 31, 2008 .

- 29 -

7.A.1.(c) All shareholders of the Company have equal voting rights.  Holders of common shares of the Company are entitled to one vote per share at all meetings of shareholders, to receive dividends as and when declared by the Directors, and to receive a pro-rata share of the assets of the Company available for distribution to common shareholders in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.  There are no pre-emptive, conversion or surrender rights attached to the common shares of the Company.

7.A.2. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had 8,420,278 issued and outstanding common shares.  The number of outstanding common shares of the Company held in the United States and the number of recorded holders thereof were 314,594 outstanding common shares and 312 recorded shareholders respectively.

7.A.3. To the best of the Company’s knowledge the Company is not controlled directly or indirectly by another corporation or by any foreign government or by any natural or legal person severally or jointly other than as disclosed in 7.A.1.in this Annual Report.

7.A.4. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, there are no known arrangements which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of the Company.

The Company shares office space with Las Vegas, a company related by certain common officers and directors.  Effective as of March 1, 2007, Las Vegas invoices the Company $1,500 plus G.S.T.  per month for providing office space, telephone and photocopy services, office supplies, reception, accounting, secretarial and other miscellaneous services for as long as such services are required by the Company.  As at December 31, 2009, Las Vegas charged the Company for its share of (i) office expenses of $14,400 (2008 - $14,400) (2007 - $12,000); (ii) rent of $3,600 (2008 - $3,600) (2007 - $4,000) and iii) other expenses paid on behalf of the Company in the amount of $1,247 (2008 - $2,563) (2007 - $504).

As at December 31, 2009, the Company charged Las Vegas for its share of other expenses paid on behalf of Las Vegas in the amount of $2,575 (2008: $3,950) (2007 - $4,061).

As at March 31, 2010, Las Vegas charged the Company for its share of (i) office expense of $3,600 (March 31, 2009 - $3,600) (March 31, 2008 - $3,600) ; (ii) rent of $900 (March 31, 2009 - $900) (March 31, 2008 - $900)  and iii) other expenses paid on behalf of the Company in the amount of $35 (March 31, 2009 - $nil) (March 31, 2008 - $nil).

Las Vegas is related to the Company by virtue of the fact that Las Vegas’ CEO and President, namely Jacob H. Kalpakian, is the Vice President of the Company, and the Chairman and CFO of Las Vegas namely Bedo H. Kalpakian, is the CEO, CFO and President of the Company.  Furthermore, Gregory T. McFarlane is a director of both the Company and Las Vegas.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company sold, through the facilities of the TSX.V, the Company’s marketable securities of 7,564,000 shares in the capital of Las Vegas for total proceeds of $431,371 which had a total acquisition cost of $2,483,113.  Of the realized loss on disposition, $1,058,892 has been reflected in 2006 and the remainder has been reflected in 2008.

As at March 31, 2010, the Company charged 99 Capital Corporation (“99 Capital”), a company formerly related with certain common officers and directors for its share of other expenses paid on behalf of 99 Capital in the amount of $3,175 (March 31, 2009 - $nil) (March 31, 2008 - $nil).

99 Capital was related to the Company by virtue of the fact that the Company’s President, CEO and CFO namely Bedo H. Kalpakian, was the Chairman and CFO of 99 Capital from November 2009 up to June 2010 and the Company’s Vice President namely Jacob H. Kalpakian was the President and CEO of 99 Capital from November 2009 up to June 2010.

- 30 -

Pursuant to the New Management Services Agreement dated November 1, 2001, as amended on August 18, 2003 and on July 31, 2005, the aggregate amount of payments made for Management Fees totaled $360,000 during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009 (2008: $360,000) (2007: $360,000)  and was paid to Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., (the “Manager”) the principals of which are Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian, both of whom are directors of the Company.  The New Management Services Agreement expires in October, 2010 and is renewable on an annual basis and may be terminated by either party by giving three months notice in writing. As at March 31, 2010, the aggregate amount of payments made for Management Fees totaled $90,000 (March 31, 2009: $90,000) (March 31, 2008: $90,000).

The Company’s Board of Directors resolved effective as of July 1, 2005, to remunerate two independent Directors for an aggregate monthly amount of $2,501 plus G.S.T.  Effective as of June 30, 2007, the Company and the two Directors agreed to terminate the aforementioned arrangement.  As of June 30, 2007 an aggregate amount of $37,166 in directors’ fees remained payable to the two Directors (the “Debt”).  The two Directors and the Company entered into respective Share for Debt Settlement Agreements on July 12, 2007 (Exhibit 10.9.1 - Incorporated by reference) and the Company issued an aggregate of 29,733 common shares at the fair market value price of $1.25 per share as full and final settlement of the Debt.

In the past, the Company hired the services of J.W. Murton & Associates to provide geological services.  J.W. Murton & Associates is a private company owned by J.W. Murton, a former director of the Company.  For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009, J. W. Murton & Associates has provided geological services to the Company in the amount of $4,317 (December 31, 2008: $68,444) (December 31, 2007: $33,797) plus G.S.T.

On September 8, 2006, the Company entered into an option agreement for the Extra High Property with Colt; this agreement was subsequently amended on October 31, 2006 and June 14, 2007. The terms of the agreement were completed in full on June 26, 2007 (see Item 4.D – I.)

On January 21, 2008, the Company entered into an option agreement for the Extra High Property with Colt (the “2008 Option Agreement”) (see Item 4.D – I).

Colt was previously related to the Company by virtue of the fact that Bedo H. Kalpakian was the President and CEO of Colt and is the President, CEO and CFO of the Company, and Jacob H. Kalpakian was the Vice President and Director of Colt and is the Vice President and Director of the Company.  Furthermore, J. Wayne Murton was a former Director of the Company and is a director of Colt.

In connection with the non-brokered private placement financing which the Company completed during the year ended December 31, 2009 (see Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources of this Annual Report ), an aggregate of 4,176,333 Units in the capital of the Company were subscribed for by the family of two directors of the Company.  In addition, a total of 37,500 Units were subscribed for by an officer of the Company.

In connection with the closing of the first tranche of the non-brokered private placement financing announced on March 11, 2010 (see Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources of this Annual Report ) , a total of 1,250,000 Units in the capital of the Company were subscribed for by a company owned by two directors of the Company.

During 2007, the Company entered into Private Placement Flow-Through Financing Agreements with two directors, for the purchase of 48,000 flow-through share units in the securities of the Company at the purchase price of $1.25 per unit for total proceeds to the Company of $60,000. Each unit consisted of common shares (the “flow-through shares”) of the Company that will be a “flow-through share” pursuant to the provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “ITA”) and one non-transferable common share purchase warrant, which entitled the holder to purchase one common share  at a price of $1.25 per flow-through warrant share until December 31, 2008. As at December 31, 2008, all 48,000 share purchase warrants expired unexercised.

- 31 -

During 2006, the Company issued 48,000 flow-through share units in the securities of the Company to two individuals, one of which is a director of the Company, at the price of $1.25 per unit for total proceeds to the Company of $60,000.  Each unit consisted of one flow-through share and one flow-through common share purchase warrant, which entitled the holder to purchase one common share at a price of $1.25 per share until December 31, 2007.  During 2007, 16,000 of the flow-through share warrants were exercised at $1.25 per flow-through share for total proceeds to the Company of $20,000 and the remaining unexercised balance of 32,000 flow-through share warrants expired.

During 2005 and 2006 the Company acquired, through Private Placement financings, an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares in the capital of Colt for a total cost to the Company of $25,000.  During 2007, the Company sold all of the Company’s marketable securities of 2,500,000 shares in the capital of Colt for total gross proceeds to the Company of $125,000.

Pursuant to a Loan Agreement between the Company and First Lithium Resources Inc. (formerly Mountain Capital Inc.) (“MCI”), a company that was formerly related to the Company by two current directors and one former director of the Company, the Company borrowed $30,000 from MCI (the “Loan”).  The Loan together with interest, at a fixed rate of 10% per annum calculated annually and not in advance, was repaid to MCI on June 1, 2009 (see Exhibit- 10.20 – Incorporated by reference).

MCI was previously related to the Company by virtue of the fact that Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian were Directors and Officers of MCI, and J. Wayne Murton was a Director of the Company and is presently a Director of MCI.

The Company is or was related to the following companies by common management and/or directors and/or officers:

-

Las Vegas From Home.com Entertainment Inc. (“Las Vegas”), a public company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange, also quoted in the U.S.A. on the Pink Sheets and on the Berlin & Frankfurt Stock Exchanges. Jacob H. Kalpakian, and Bedo H. Kalpakian are officers, directors and shareholders of Las Vegas and Gregory T. McFarlane is a director of Las Vegas;

-

Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., a private company incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, the principal shareholders of which are Jacob H. Kalpakian and Bedo H. Kalpakian, directors of the Company;

-

BHK Management Inc., a private company incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, the principal shareholder of which is Bedo H. Kalpakian, a director of the Company;

-

30 Rock Management Inc., a private company incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, the principal shareholder of which is Jacob H. Kalpakian, a director of the Company;

-

Colt Resources Inc. (“Colt”), a reporting issuer in the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia and Ontario and a public company listed on the CNSX in Canada and on the Pink Sheets in the U.S.A.   Colt was formerly related to the Company by certain directors and officers as more particularly described in this Annual Report.

-

J.W. Murton & Associates, a private company incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, the principal shareholder of which is J. Wayne Murton, a former director of the Company;

-

First Lithium Resources Inc. (formerly Mountain Capital Inc. (“MCI”) is a public company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange.  J. Wayne Murton is a director and shareholder of MCI.  MCI was formerly related to the Company by certain directors and officers as more particularly described in this Annual Report.

-

Touchdown Capital Inc. (“Touchdown”) is a public company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange.   Jacob H. Kalpakian and Bedo H. Kalpakian were officers and directors of Touchdown from July 2005 until June 2010.

-

99 Capital Corporation (“99 Capital”) is a public company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange.  Jacob H. Kalpakian and Bedo H. Kalpakian were officers and directors of 99 Capital from November 2009 until June 2010.

- 32 -

As at December 31, 2009, the Company charged Colt for its share of certain expenses in the amount of $615 (2008 - $11,340; 2007 - $nil).

As at December 31, 2009, Colt charged the Company for its share of certain expenses paid on behalf of the Company in the amount of $nil (2008 - $255; 2007 - $1,250).

As at December 31, 2009, Touchdown was charged by the Company for its share of certain expenses paid on behalf of Touchdown in the amount of $2,275 (2008 - $2,195; 2007 - $nil).

Not Applicable.

The Company’s Audited Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, are included in Item 17 of this report.

The Company is presently not a party to any legal proceeding of any kind.

The Company's corporate legal counsels are:  Anfield Sujir Kennedy & Durno, Barristers and Solicitors, (Attn: Michael Kennedy), located at #1600 - 609 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V7Y 1C3.  The telefax number is (604) 669-3877.

The Company has never paid and does not intend to pay any dividends in the future.

There have been no significant changes in the affairs of the Company since the year ended December 31, 2009.

On April 4, 1985, the Company's common shares were listed and posted for trading on the Vancouver Stock Exchange, on the Montreal Exchange on January 15, 1988 and, on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on May 11, 1988.  On July 12, 1991, the Company voluntarily de-listed its common shares from the Montreal Exchange, and, on October 3, 1994, the Company's shares were delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market.  Effective October 4, 1994, the Company's shares have been listed for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board.  Effective on November 29, 1999 the Vancouver Stock Exchange became known as the CDNX as a result of the merger between the Vancouver Stock Exchange and the Alberta Stock Exchange.  On July 5, 2001, the Company made a formal application to the CDNX requesting the voluntary delisting of the Company’s common shares from trading on the CDNX, as a result of which, the common shares of the Company were de-listed from trading on the CDNX effective at the close of trading on July 31, 2001. The trading symbol of the Company's common shares when they were listed on the CDNX was "GGG".  During the period commencing from January, 2001, up to July 31, 2001, a total of 373,095 common shares of the Company traded on the CDNX at prices ranging from a high of $0.40 to a low of $0.22.

- 33 -

On July 30, 1986, the Company's share capital split on the basis of one-old-for-two-new common shares. On May 25, 1992, the Company's share capital was consolidated on the basis of ten-old-for-one-new common share.  On April 25, 2000, the Company’s share capital was consolidated on the basis of fifteen-old-for-one-new common share.  On May 2, 2002, the Company’s name was changed to Lucky 1 Enterprises Inc. and its share capital was consolidated on the basis of five-old-for-one-new common share and its authorized share capital was subsequently increased to 200,000,000 common shares without par value.  On January 17, 2005, the Company’s name was changed to Bronx Ventures Inc. and its share capital was consolidated on the basis of thirty-five-old-for-one-new-common share, and its authorized share capital was subsequently increased to an unlimited number of common and preferred shares without par value. Effective at the opening of business on January 24, 2005, the common shares of Lucky 1 Enterprises Inc. were de-listed, and the common shares of Bronx Ventures Inc. commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board in the U.S.A. under the trading symbol “BRXVF”.  On March 19, 2007, the Company changed its name to Zab Resources Inc. and subdivided its stock on a one (1) old for 50 (new) shares basis. As a result, the shares of Bronx Ventures Inc. were de-listed from trading and the shares of Zab Resources Inc. commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board in the USA under the symbol “ZABRF” on March 22, 2007.

Effective November 28, 2007, the common shares of the Company have been listed for trading on the Canadian National Stock Exchange (“CNSX”) (formerly Canadian Trading and Quotation System (CNQ))

under the trading symbol “ZABK”.  On October 17, 2008, the Company’s CNSX symbol was changed to “ZAB” pursuant to the CNSX adopting a three character symbol format.

On April 16, 2009, the Company changed its name from Zab Resources Inc. (“Zab”) to Kokomo Enterprises Inc. (“Kokomo”) and the Company’s share capital was consolidated on the basis of 25 (old) shares of Zab for 1 (new) share of Kokomo.  As a result, the shares of Zab were de-listed from trading and the shares of Kokomo commenced trading in Canada on the CNSX under the symbol “KKO”, and in the U.S.A. the shares of Kokomo commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “KKOEF”.  The Cusip number of the Company’s common shares is 500323100.

The following tables set forth the market price range and trading volumes of the common shares of the Company on the OTC Bulletin Board and on the CNSX for the periods indicated.

OTC BULLETIN BOARD

Trading Range

- 34 -

CNSX

Canadian National Stock Exchange

(formerly CanadianTrading & Quotation System)

Trading Range

On April 4, 1985, the Company's common shares were listed and posted for trading on the Vancouver Stock Exchange, on the Montreal Exchange on January 15, 1988 and, on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on May 11, 1988.  On July 12, 1991, the Company voluntarily de-listed its common shares from the Montreal Exchange, and, on October 3, 1994, the Company's shares were de-listed from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market.  Effective October 4, 1994, the Company's shares have been listed for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board.  The current trading symbol of the Company’s common shares on the OTC Bulletin Board is “KKOEF”.  Effective on November 29, 1999 the Vancouver Stock Exchange became known as the CDNX as a result of the merger between the Vancouver Stock Exchange and the Alberta Stock Exchange.  On July 5, 2001, the Company made a formal application to the CDNX requesting the voluntary delisting of the Company’s common shares from trading on the CDNX, as a result of which, the common shares of the Company were de-listed from trading on the CDNX effective at the close of trading on July 31, 2001.

- 35 -

Effective November 28, 2007, the common shares of the Company were listed for trading on the Canadian National Stock Exchange (“CNSX”) (formerly known as the Canadian Trading and Quotation System (“CNQ”))  Canada under the trading symbol “ZABK”.  Effective on October 17, 2008, the Company’s CNSX symbol was changed to “ZAB” pursuant to the CNSX adopting a three character symbol format.

On April 16, 2009, the Company changed its name from Zab Resources Inc. (“Zab”) to Kokomo Enterprises Inc. (“Kokomo”), and the Company consolidated its capital stock on the basis of 25 (old) shares of Zab for 1 (new) share of Kokomo.  As a result, the shares of Zab were de-listed from trading and the shares of Kokomo commenced trading in Canada on the CNSX under the symbol “KKO”, and in the U.S.A. the shares of Kokomo commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “KKOEF”.  The Cusip number of the Company’s common shares is 500323100.

Effective April 16, 2009, the Company’s name was changed to Kokomo Enterprises Inc., its share capital was consolidated on the basis of 25 (old) shares of Zab for 1 (new) share of Kokomo.

The authorized share capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of common and preferred shares without par value of which 10,920,278 common shares are issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2010.  No preferred shares have been issued.

Holders of common shares of the Company are entitled to one vote per share at all meetings of shareholders of the Company, to receive dividends as and when declared by the Directors, and to receive a pro-rata share of the assets of the Company available for distribution to common shareholders in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.  There are no pre-emptive, conversion or surrender rights attached to the common shares of the Company.

All shares have been issued pursuant to resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company.

All warrants have been issued pursuant to resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company.

The following summarizes the warrants that have been granted, exercised, cancelled or expired during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

- 36 -

As of May 31, 2010, the following warrants are outstanding:

The Company’s shareholders re-approved its 2004 Stock Option Plan whereby the Company may reserve for granting to directors, officers, employees and consultants up to 20% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company calculated from time to time on a rolling basis.  The Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan has received the required re-approval of the Company’s shareholders and of its Board of Directors.  From time to time, the Company grants stock options to its directors, employees and consultants on terms and conditions acceptable to the Regulatory Authorities. The stock options entitle the holders to acquire common shares of the Company from treasury (See Exhibit 10.7 – Incorporated by reference).

The following summarizes the employee and director stock options that have been granted, exercised, cancelled and expired during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

As at December 31, 2009, the weighted average remaining contractual life is 1.45 years.

- 37 -

At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, all stock options outstanding were exercisable. All options

vested immediately upon grant.

The Company applies the fair value method using the Black-Scholes option pricing model in accounting for its stock options granted.  Accordingly, during 2009 compensation of $nil (2008 - nil; 2007 - $9,800) was recognized as salaries and benefits, and during 2009 compensation of $nil (2008 - $nil; 2007 - $208,547) was recognized as directors’ compensation.

As at May 31, 2010, the following stock options were outstanding and exercisable:

*As a result of the resignation of the Company’s former director namely J. Wayne Murton on December 7, 2009 .

There are no special voting rights attached to any of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares.  All shares which were issued from the Company’s Treasury were issued for cash or in the case of Finder’s Fees, for services rendered.

CAPITAL STOCK

Authorized: Unlimited number of Common and Preferred shares without par value, of which there are no preferred shares issued.

All common shares and per share amounts have been restated to give retroactive effect to the 25:1 share consolidation, which took effect on April 16, 2009.

- 38 -

- 39 -

The Company’s shareholders considered and approved a special resolution to adopt new Articles for the Company at the Company’s Special Meeting which was held on January 10, 2005, (Exhibit 3.2 - Incorporated by reference).

On March 26, 2004, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.5 – Incorporated by reference) with an arm’s length party (the “Arm’s Length Party”) in respect to certain mineral claims, which are situated in the Kamloops Mining Division in British Columbia (the “Extra High Property”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Option Agreement as amended on March 8, 2005, the Company obtained the right to acquire a 100% undivided interest in the Extra High Property, subject to a 1.5% net smelter returns royalty (the “Arm’s Length Royalty”), by making staged cash payments totalling $150,000 and incurring exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property totalling $500,000 over a period of three years.  Upon the Company earning a 100% undivided interest in the Extra High Property, the Company obtained the right to purchase at any time 50% of the Arm’s Length Royalty by paying to the Arm’s Length Party the sum of $500,000 leaving the Arm’s Length Party with a 0.75% NSR royalty.

On September 8, 2006, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.11 – Incorporated by reference) with Colt Resources Inc. (“Colt”) whereby Colt obtained the right to acquire a 50% undivided interest, subject to the Arm’s Length Royalty, in the Extra High Property by incurring exploration expenditures of $240,000 on the Extra High Property by no later than February 28, 2007 and by making cash payments to the Company totaling $133,770 by no later than March 26, 2007.  On September 12, 2006, the Company and the Arm’s Length Party amended the Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.5.1 – Incorporated by reference) by entering into an Amending Agreement whereby the Company was granted an extension period until June 26, 2007 to make the balance of cash payments to the Arm’s Length Party and incur the remaining exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property.  On October 31, 2006, the Company and Colt entered into an Amending Agreement (Exhibit 10.11.2 – Incorporated by reference) whereby Colt was granted an extension period until June 26, 2007 to incur exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property and to make the cash payments to the Company.  Upon Colt earning its 50% undivided interest in the Extra High Property, the Company and Colt would thereafter equally contribute to all future exploration costs.  If any party would fail to contribute its share of future exploration costs, then its respective interest would be diluted on a straight-line basis.  If any party’s interest would be diluted to less than a 10% interest, then that party’s interest in the Extra High Property would be converted into a 0.5% NSR royalty.  On April 16, 2007, the Company and the Arm’s Length Party amended the Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.5.2 – Incorporated by reference) by entering into an Amending Agreement whereby the Company was released of the requirement to incur the remaining exploration expenditures but instead was required to make a cash payment of $60,000 (paid) to the Arm’s Length Party.

On June 14, 2007, the Company amended its Option Agreement with Colt whereby Colt would have the right to acquire a 34% interest in the Extra High Property by making cash payments to the Company totalling $193,770 by no later than June 26, 2007. The Amending Agreement released Colt of the requirement to incur $240,000 in exploration expenditures on the Extra High Property.  On June 26, 2007, the Company made its final payment to the Arm’s Length Party thereby earning a 100% undivided interest in the Extra High Property subject only to the Arm’s Length Royalty. Colt made its final payment to the Company and earned its 34% interest in the Extra High Property, thus reducing the Company’s interest to 66%.

On January 21, 2008, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (the “2008 Option Agreement”) (see Exhibit 10.11.3 - Incorporated by reference ) with Colt whereby Colt was granted the right and option to acquire, in two separate equal tranches, the Company’s 66% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.  Pursuant to the 2008 Option Agreement, Colt has exercised the first tranche of the option by making a cash payment of $250,000 to the Company and has acquired from the Company a 33% undivided interest in the Extra High Property.  As a result of exercising the first tranche of the option, Colt now holds a 67% undivided interest in the Extra High Property and has become the operator of the Extra High Property.

- 40 -

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company sold all of its Ontario Lithium Properties (Mineral Leases) to an arm’s length party for gross proceeds of $54,500 consisting of $50,000 cash payment and marketable securities of $4,500 valued at the quoted market price at receipt (see Exhibit 10.12 – Incorporated by reference).  Furthermore, the arm’s length party is obligated to pay to the Company one-half percent (1/2%) gross receipts royalty after six months from the date of commencement of commercial production from the Ontario Lithium Properties (Mineral Leases).  These properties were previously written-off at the end of fiscal year 2000.

On October 24, 2008, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (see Exhibit 10.13 – Incorporated by reference) with two individuals, who are at arm’s length to the Company, in respect to certain mineral claims which are situated in the Lillooet Mining Division in British Columbia (the “Hope Creek Property”). Pursuant to the terms of the Option Agreement, the Company obtained the right to acquire a 100% undivided interest in the Hope Creek Property, subject to a 1% NSR royalty, by issuing 2,000 common shares, making staged cash payments totaling $90,000 over three years, incurring not less than $50,000 in exploration expenditures on the Hope Creek Property by December 31, 2008 and incurring additional optional exploration expenditures totaling $250,000 over a period of three years.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company fulfilled its commitment and issued 2,000 common shares and incurred $68,654 in exploration expenditures by December 31, 2008. The $90,000 staged cash payments are optional and payable as follows: (i) $15,000 on or before December 31, 2009; (ii) $25,000 on or before December 31, 2010; and (iii) $50,000 on or before December 31, 2011.  On October 14, 2009, the Company terminated the Option Agreement and the Company’s investment in the Hope Creek Property has been written-off.

The New Management Services Agreement dated November 1, 2001 (Exhibit 10.4 - Incorporated by reference) as amended on August 18, 2003 and on July 31, 2005, (Exhibit 10.4.1 - Incorporated by reference) the aggregate amount of payments made for Management Fees totaled $360,000 during the year ended December 31, 2009 (2008: $360,000) (2007: $360,000) and was paid to Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., (the “Manager”) the principals of which are Bedo H. Kalpakian and Jacob H. Kalpakian, both of whom are directors of the Company.  The New Management Services Agreement expires in October, 2010 and is renewable on an annual basis and may be terminated by either party by giving three months notice in writing. The Company reimburses Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd., for all travelling and other expenses incurred on behalf of the Company by Kalpakian Bros. of B.C. Ltd.

On February 8, 2010, the Company entered into a binding letter of intent (“LOI”) with an arm’s length party to acquire a 75% right, title and interest in the surface rights of the Zaniza Iron Ore Property which covers an area of approximately 153 square kilometers and is located in the Municipality of Sola De Vega in the State of Oaxaca in Mexico ( see Exhibit 10.21* – Attached herewith ) .  The parties to the LOI have agreed to enter into a Definitive Agreement which will be subject to the approvals of the CNSX, the Board of Directors of the Company, and if required by the CNSX, the approval of the stockholders of the Company.  The consideration payable by the Company to the arm’s length party shall be a cash payment of US $100,000 upon the execution of the Definitive Agreement, and the issuance of a Convertible Debenture for the amount of US $900,000, which will have a maturity of 4 years, shall bear simple interest at an annual rate of 5%, and may be converted into Kokomo shares at the price of US $0.10 per share in year one, US $0.25 per share in year two, US $0.50 per share in year three and US $1.00 per share in year four.  On June 22, 2010, the Parties to the LOI entered into and executed an Amending Agreement ( see Exhibit 10.22* – Attached herewith ), whereby the Parties have agreed that in the event a Definitive Agreement is not entered into and is not executed by the Parties by August 31, 2010, then the LOI shall terminate. There are no assurances whatsoever that this contemplated transaction shall be consummated.

(a)

No governmental laws, decrees or regulations in the Province of British Columbia, Canada, restrict export or import of capital, including, but not limited to, foreign exchange controls, or affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of the Registrant's securities.

(b)

There are no limitations on the right of non-resident or foreign owners to hold or vote such securities imposed by foreign law or by the charter or other constituent document of the Registrant.

- 41 -

General

The following comments summarize the material Canadian and U.S. Federal Income Tax consequences for a shareholder of the Registrant who is a non-resident of Canada and who is a resident of the United States subject to taxation under the laws of the United States.

The following is based upon the current provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Tax Act") and regulations thereunder, the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") and regulations thereunder, the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention, 1980 (the "Convention"), the current administrative policies and practices published by Revenue Canada or by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and all specific proposals to amend the Tax Act and regulations thereunder that have been publicly announced by the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof, and judicial decisions, all of which are subject to change.  The following does not take into account the tax laws of the various provinces or territories of Canada or the tax laws of the various state and local jurisdictions of the United States or foreign jurisdictions.

The following is intended to be a general description of the Canadian and U.S. Federal income tax considerations material to a purchase of the common shares and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any prospective holders.  The following does not address consequences peculiar to any holder subject to special provision of Canadian or U.S. income tax law.  Therefore, prospective holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of an investment in the common shares of Kokomo Enterprises Inc.

CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

Dividends on Common Stock

Under the Tax Act, a non-resident of Canada is subject to withholding tax at the rate of 25% on dividends from a corporation resident in Canada.  The Convention reduces this rate to 15% for a shareholder resident in the United States.  Withholding tax is further reduced to 5% if the United States resident shareholder is a corporation that beneficially owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the corporation paying the dividend.

Exemptions from Withholding Tax

The Convention provides exemption from Canadian income tax on dividends paid to religious, scientific, literary, educational or charitable organizations or to an organization constituted and operated exclusively to administer or provide benefits under one or more pension, retirement or employee benefit funds or plans. To qualify for exemption such organizations must be resident in the United States and be exempt from income tax under the laws of the United States.

Dispositions of Common Stock

The following comments apply only to a shareholder whose Common stock constitutes capital property to him for purposes of the Income Tax Act.

- 42 -

Common stock will generally constitute capital property unless the holder is a trader or dealer in securities or is engaged in a venture in the nature of trade in respect of Common Stock.

Common stock of a resident public corporation will constitute taxable Canadian property of a shareholder at a particular time if at any time in the preceding five (5) years, 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the Registrant belonged to the non-resident shareholder, persons with whom the non-resident did not deal at arm's length, or to the non-resident shareholder and persons with whom the non-resident shareholder did not deal at arm's length.

Under the Tax Act, a non-resident of Canada is subject to Canadian tax on taxable capital gains from dispositions of taxable Canadian property and may deduct allowable capital losses from dispositions of taxable Canadian property.  If the shares are considered taxable Canadian property, the vendor may be required to withhold tax pursuant to section 116 of the Tax Act.

Upon disposal of capital property the amount, if any, by which a taxpayer's proceeds of disposition exceed or are exceeded by the adjusted cost base of the capital property (including expenses of disposition) represent the capital gain (or loss) on disposition of the capital property.  One half of the gain (the "taxable capital gain") is brought into income and taxed at normal rates.  One half of the loss (the "allowable capital loss") can be deducted from taxable capital gains realized in the same year.  Pursuant to the Federal Budget which was announced on February 28, 2000, the taxable capital gain and allowable capital loss inclusion rate was reduced from three-fourths to two-thirds for dispositions after February 27, 2000.  On October 18, 2000, the Federal Budget further reduced the inclusion rate from two-thirds to one-half for dispositions after October 17, 2000.  For dispositions of taxable Canadian property any excess of allowable capital losses over taxable capital gains becomes a "net capital loss" which can be carried to other years to reduce taxable capital gains from the disposition of such property.

The Convention gives protection to United States residents from Canadian tax on certain gains derived from the alienation of property.  There is no protection for a gain on a disposition of shares the value of which is derived principally from real property in Canada.  Protection under the Convention will be available as long as the Registrant remains a Canadian public corporation or its shares continue to be listed on a prescribed stock exchange.

Revenue Canada has indicated that it considers the protection of the Convention with respect to capital gains extend to a "deemed disposition" under the Tax Act, including the "deemed disposition" arising upon the death of a taxpayer.

U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

KOKOMO ENTERPISES INC. (formerly Zab Resources Inc.) ("Kokomo") is classified as a Passive Foreign Investment company (PFIC) for U.S. federal income tax purposes since the following conditions have applied for at least one taxable year since 1986:

1)  75% or more of its gross income has been passive;

2)  The average percentage of its assets producing passive income is at least 50%.

The following is intended to be a general description of the U.S. Federal income tax considerations material to a purchase of the common shares and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any prospective holders. Prospective holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of an investment in the common shares of Kokomo.

Since Kokomo has satisfied the PFIC criteria for at least one taxable year since 1986, while a shareholder holds shares in Kokomo, it remains a PFIC as to that shareholder even if it no longer meets the income or asset test.  Classification as a PFIC will create U.S. tax consequences to a U.S. Shareholder that are unique to the PFIC provisions and that are not encountered in other investments.

- 43 -

Generally, a U.S. shareholder will realize ordinary income on the receipt of cash dividends or property distributions from an investment in the shares of a foreign corporation to the extent such dividends are paid out of the foreign company's current accumulated earnings and profits.  To the extent of any withholding taxes, both individual and corporate investors must include such taxes in income and, in turn, claim a foreign tax credit.  Certain corporate investors are also entitled to gross up the underlying foreign corporate income taxes and claim a foreign tax credit.

Thus, under the general rule, no U.S. federal income tax consequences occur until an actual dividend is paid.  Although this general rule can apply in a PFIC investment, there are significant deviations from this general rule and many elections available to a U.S. shareholder that can alter the U.S. federal income tax consequences.  Such consequences will be unique to each U.S. shareholder.

In the absence of any PFIC elections, a U.S. shareholder of a PFIC, will be taxed under the excess distribution method.  Under this method, where a current year dividend exceeds 125% of the average of dividends during the preceding three taxable years, the excess must be allocated rateably to each day in the taxpayer's holding period.

The amount of the excess allocated to the current year and to years when the corporation was not a PFIC is included in the shareholder's gross income for the year of the distribution.  The remainder of the excess is not included in gross income, but the U.S. shareholder must pay a deferred tax amount by allocating the remaining excess to all PFIC years, re-computing the tax for each PFIC year and computing and paying the resultant interest on the recomputed tax for each PFIC year.  As indicated above, foreign tax credit relief is available for withholding taxes for both individual and corporate investors.  Relief for underlying corporate tax is only available for certain corporate investors.

Under the excess distribution method, gain on the disposition of PFIC shares results in the same allocation process; gross income inclusion; tax re-computation; and interest charges as an excess distribution.

In lieu of the excess distribution method, a U.S. shareholder may elect to treat a PFIC as a Qualified Electing Fund ("QEF") and be taxed under the QEF method.  If that election is made, the U.S. shareholder will be taxed currently on its pro-rata share of the earnings of the QEF.  The current income inclusion eliminates the interest charge under the excess distribution method.  Thus, unlike the excess distribution method that requires the receipt of cash from an actual dividend or sale, the QEF method invokes taxation without the receipt of cash.

Shareholders, who make a QEF election may, or may not, remain subject to tax under the excess distribution method.  If the U.S. shareholder makes the QEF election for the foreign corporation's first tax year as a PFIC that is included in the shareholder's holding period, the excess distribution will not apply to the shareholder.  Thus, this type of shareholder will include its pro-rata share of PFIC earnings as a dividend, claim the appropriate foreign tax credit, and not face any interest charge.

If the shareholder makes the QEF election at a later time, in the absence of any other PFIC election, current taxation under the QEF method will apply prospectively.  However, the excess distribution method continues to apply prior to the effective date of the QEF election.

If the shareholder makes the QEF election at a later time, the shareholder has an additional option to make a purging election.  If a purging election is made, the PFIC stock would be treated as if it were sold and the gain treated as an excess distribution requiring:  a gross income inclusion; allocation to PFIC years in the shareholder's holding period, a tax re-computation for PFIC years in the shareholder's holding period; and an interest charge payment.  As a result of the purging election, thereafter the excess distribution method would not apply to that shareholder.

- 44 -

Under the QEF method, the U.S. shareholder has another option.  In lieu of paying the tax on its pro-rata share of PFIC earnings, the U.S. shareholder in a QEF on the last day of the QEF's tax year may elect to extend the time for payment of any of its undistributed PFIC earnings tax liability for the tax year.  If the election is made, the election is treated as an extension of time to pay tax and, thus, the U.S. shareholder is liable for interest.

In lieu of any of the above-described methods, since Kokomo is regularly traded on a national securities exchange, U.S. shareholders may wish to make an election to mark to market.

A U.S. shareholder of a PFIC may make a mark to market election for marketable PFIC stock.  If the election is made, the shareholder includes in income each year an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the PFIC stock as of the close of the tax year over the shareholder's adjusted basis in the stock.  Decreases in market value are allowed as deductions, within certain prescribed limits.

Generally, under the mark to market election, the general PFIC rules under the excess distribution method and QEF method do not apply.  However, if the mark to market election is made after a U.S. shareholder has maintained its investment, there are provisions that ensure that the interest charge on amounts attributable to periods before the election is not avoided.

PERSONS CONSIDERING THE PURCHASE OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHARES SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH REGARD TO THE APPLICATION OF CANADIAN, U.S. AND OTHER TAX LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATION.

Not Applicable.

Not Applicable.

We have filed this 2009 Annual Report on Form 20-F with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Statements made in this Annual Report as to the contents of any contract, agreement or other document referred to are not necessarily complete.  With respect to each such contract, agreement or other document filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report, reference is made to the exhibit for a more complete description of the matter involved, and each such statement shall be deemed qualified in its entirety by such reference.

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act and file reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Reports and other information which we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Annual Report on Form 20-F, may be inspected at the public reference facilities of the Securities and Exchange Commission at: 450 Fifth Street N.W., Room 1024, Washington, D.C. 20549.  Additionally, copies of this material may also be obtained from the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Site at http://www.sec.gov .  The Commission’s telephone number is 1-800-SEC-0330.

Not Applicable.

Financial Instruments

The Company has classified its cash and cash equivalents as held-for-trading; marketable securities as available-for-sale; and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and payable to related parties, as other financial liabilities.

- 45 -

The carrying values of cash, payable to related parties, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the relatively short periods to maturity of those financial instruments.

The Company’s risk exposure and the impact on the Company’s financial instruments are summarized below:

(a)

Credit risk

Credit risk arises from the non-performance of counterparties of contractual financial obligations.

The Company’s concentration of credit risk and maximum exposure thereto is as follows relating to funds held in Canada:

(b)

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in satisfying its financial obligations as they become due. The Company manages its liquidity risk by forecasting cash flows from operations and anticipated investing and financing activities. At March 31, 2010, the Company had accounts payable excluding accrued liabilities of $15,829 (March 31, 2009 - $84,691; March 31, 2008 - $6,519) which are due within 30 days and amounts payable to related parties of $14,903 (March 31, 2009 - $130,702; March 31, 2008 - $28,170) which are due on demand.

(c)

Market risk

Market risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Market risk comprises three types of risk: interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and other price risk. The Company is not exposed to foreign currency risk.

(i)

Interest rate risk

The Company’s cash consists of cash held in bank accounts earning interest at variable interest rates. Fluctuations in market rates do not have a significant impact on estimated fair values as of March 31, 2010. The Company is not exposed to significant interest rate risk.

(ii)

Other price risk

Other price risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk or foreign exchange risk. The Company is not exposed to other price risk.

- 46 -

Not Applicable.

The Company is not in default in the payment of principal, interest, sinking fund instalment or any other default with respect to any indebtedness of the Company.

There have been no changes in the constituent instruments defining the rights of holders of common stock and no issuance of any other securities that has modified the rights of holders of common stock.

Use of Proceeds from Offering

Not Applicable.

a)

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.  Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures [(as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d -14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)] as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F.  Based on such evaluation, he has concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective and designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms.

b)

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING.  Our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(c) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act.  Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of our consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.  In making this assessment, they used the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  Based on this assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, all internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective may not prevent or detect misstatements and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

c)

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS.  There were no changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could affect these controls subsequent to the date of evaluation by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

[ Exhibit 31.1* – Attached herewith ]

- 47 -

16.A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

The financial experience of Bedo H. Kalpakian, including his experience currently serving as Chief Financial Officer of one other public company and of the registrant and a private company, and his experience in actively supervising principal financial officers, principal accounting officers, accountants, controllers and auditors determines that he is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  (See Item 6.C.3. in this Annual Report for further details on the Audit Committee.)

16.B. Code of Ethics

On May 31, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a Code of Ethics (the “Code”) for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and its principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar function (the “Senior Financial Officers”) to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct in the practice of financial management, full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure; and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.  These Senior Financial Officers are expected to abide by this Code as well as by all of the Company’s other applicable business policies, standards and guidelines. (Exhibit 14.1 –Incorporated by reference)

The Code of Ethics can be accessed electronically at http://www.kokomoenterprises.ca .

(a)

Audit Fees: The aggregate fees billed for each of the last three fiscal years by the Company’s Auditors were (2009: $28,668) (2008: $48,478) and (2007:  $38,587).

(b)

Audit – Related Fees were (2009: $3,400) (2008: $ $7,478) and (2007: $3,087) which are included in the amounts disclosed in item (a) above.

(c)

Tax Fees: Tax fees were (2009: $1,500) (2008: $1,500) and (2007: $1,500) which are included in the amounts disclosed in item (a) above.

(d)

All other Fees: There were no other fees.

For further details with respect to the Audit Committee’s Charter included in the Company’s Information Circular dated April 19, 2010. ( see Exhibit 18* – Attached herewith )

The Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures : The Audit Committee has adopted procedures to pre-approve audit services and all non-audit related services to be rendered by the Company’s external auditors. The Chairman of the Audit Committee has been delegated authority to pre-approve audit services up to a maximum cost of $30,000 and individual assignments up to a maximum cost of $5,000. All other assignments must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee.  All amounts which exceed the authorized amounts require further approval from the Audit Committee.

- 48 -

The Company’s Audited Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, together with the report of the auditors, Smythe Ratcliffe, Chartered Accountants, are filed as part of this Annual Report.  The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian dollars (Cdn $).

A) Index to Financial Statements

i) Financial Statements

-Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the years 2009 and 2008 Page 53

-Comments by Independent Accountants for United States Readers on Canada - United States Reporting Conflict Page 53

-Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 Page 54

-Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 Page 55

-Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Page 56

-Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 Page 57

-Notes to the Financial Statements Page 58-81

- 49 -

The Company's financial statements which are required to be filed hereunder are listed in Item 17 and are specifically incorporated herein by this reference.  The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian dollars (Cdn $) and are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation and Memorandum and Articles (Incorporated by reference – Previously filed on Registration Statement on Form 20-F, May 1988)

3.2

New Articles (Incorporated by reference) –Static Copy of British Columbia Business Corporations Act ( BCBCA ). Previously filed on Form 20-F 2004 (SEC Accession No. 0000945234-05-000483)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000094523405000483/o17223exv3w2.htm

3.4

Certificate of Name Change to Kokomo Enterprises Inc.

SEC Accession No. 0001137171-09-000478 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717109000478/ex0304.htm

10.1      2003 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference previously filed on Form 20-F/A, June 2003)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717103000199/form20f2002bcl.htm

10.4      Management Services Agreement, (Incorporated by reference - previously filed on Form 20-F, 2001 as amended on August 14, 2003 and July 1, 2005) http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/999999999702037711/9999999997-02-037711.txt

10.4.1   Addendum to the Management Services Agreement dated July 31, 2005 – Previously filed on Form 20F 2005)  (US Sec Accession No. 0001137171-06-001515) http:// www .sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717106001515/ex1041.htm

10.5       Property Option Agreement – Previously filed on Form 20-F 2003. (SEC Accession No. 0001137171-04-000850)
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717104000850/option.htm

10.5.1    Amendment to the Property Option Agreement dated September 12, 2006 – (SEC Accession No.0001137171-07-000906 )

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717107000906/ex1005a.htm

10.5.2    Amendment to the Property Option Agreement dated April 17, 2007 –  (SEC Accession No. 0001137171-07-000906)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717107000906/ex1005b.htm

10.7      2004 Stock Option Plan - Previously filed on Form 20-F 2003. (SEC Accession No. 0001137171-04-000850) http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717104000850/ex93.htm

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717104000850/debtsettlement2.htm

10.9.1    Debt Settlement Agreements dated July 12, 2007 – ( SEC Accession No. 0001137171-08-000659)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717108000659/ex100901.htm

- 50 -

10.11     Property Option Agreement with Colt Capital Corp. dated September 8, 2006 – (SEC Accession No . 0001137171-07-000906)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717107000906/ex1011.htm

10.11.1  First Amendment dated September 22, 2006 to the Property Option Agreement (SEC Accession No. 0001137171-07-000906)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717107000906/ex1011a.htm

10.11.2  Second Amendment dated October 31, 2006 to the Property Option Agreement (SEC Accession No. 0001137171-07-000906)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717107000906/ex1011b.htm

10.11.3 Option Agreement with Colt Resources Inc. dated January 21, 2008 – ( SEC Accession No. 0001137171-08-000659 )

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717108000659/ex101103.htm

10.12  Property Purchase Agreement with James Bay Midarctic Developments Inc. dated July 31, 2008 -  (SEC Accession No. 0001137171-09-000478)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717109000478/ex1012.htm

10.13* Hope Creek Property Option Agreement dated October 24, 2008 - (SEC Accession No. 0001137171-09-000478)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717109000478/ex1013.htm

10.20  Loan Agreement with Mountain Capital Inc. (now known as First Lithium Resources Inc.) (SEC Accession No. 0001137171-09-000478)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717109000478/ex1020.htm

10.21* Letter of Intent dated February 8, 2010 between the Company and MMYC (Attached herewith).

10.22* Amending Agreement dated June 22, 2010 between the Company and MMYC (Attached herewith).

11.1* Statement explaining in reasonable detail how earnings/loss per share is calculated

14.1       Code of Ethics - Previously filed on Form 20-F 2003. (SEC Accession No.
0001137171-04-000850) http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717104000850/ex96.htm

18. * Notice of Annual General Meeting, 2010 and Management Proxy Materials

19.

Notice of Annual General Meeting, 2009 and Management Proxy Materials (Incorporated by reference – previously filed on Form 6K for the month of May, 2009 ( SEC Accession No. 0001137171-09-000424 )

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717109000424/ex992.htm

20.

Notice of Annual General Meeting, 2008 and Management Proxy Materials (Incorporated by reference – previously filed on Form 6K June 16, 2008 (SEC Accession No. 0001137171-08-000573)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717108000573/ex992.htm

20.1

Notice of Annual General Meeting, 2007 and Management Proxy Materials (Incorporated by reference – previously filed on Form 6K May 31, 2007 (Accession Number 0001137171-07-000842) http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717107000842/0001137171-07-000842-index.htm

20.4       Notice of Special General Meeting, 2005 and Management Proxy Materials

(Incorporated by reference - previously filed on Form 6-K December 3, 2004)

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/825171/000113717104001556/ex2.htm

31.1* Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 302, Certified by

Bedo H. Kalpakian, President, C.E.O. & C.F.O. (Attached)

Page 86

32.1* Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 906, Certified by

Bedo H. Kalpakian, C.E.O & C.F.O. (Attached)

Page 87

99. * Financial Exhibits: – (unaudited)

99.1*

Schedules I - Marketable Securities - Other Investments

Page 82

99.2*

Schedules II - Amounts Receivable from Related Parties and Underwriters,

Promoters and Employees other than Related Parties

Page 83

99.3*

Schedules III & IV - Property, Plant and Equipment and Accumulated

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment

Page 84

* Filed Herewith (Attached)

- 51 -

KOKOMO ENTERPRISES INC.

(formerly Zab Resources Inc.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008

(Canadian Dollars)

Index

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

1

Financial Statements

Balance Sheets

2

Statements of Operations

3

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

4

Statements of Cash Flows

5

Notes to Financial Statements

6 – 29

- 52 -

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF KOKOMO ENTERPRISES INC.

(formerly Zab Resources Inc.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

We have audited the balance sheets of Kokomo Enterprises Inc. (formerly Zab Resources Inc.) (an exploration stage company) as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

“Smythe Ratcliffe LLP” (signed)

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

April 27, 2010

COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR US READERS ON CANADA-US REPORTING DIFFERENCES

In the United States, reporting standards of the PCAOB for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in note 2 to the financial statements. Our report to the stockholders dated April 27, 2010 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditors’ report when these are adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

“Smythe Ratcliffe LLP” (signed)

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

April 27, 2010

- 53 -

KOKOMO ENTERPRISES INC.

(formerly Zab Resources Inc.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

December 31

(Canadian Dollars)