HUBG 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

or

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 0-27754

HUB GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2000 Clearwater Drive

Oak Brook, Illinois 60523

(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(630) 271-3600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ¨ No x

On October 27, 2014, the registrant had 36,750,359 outstanding shares of Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share, and 662,296 outstanding shares of Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share.

Table of Contents

HUB GROUP, INC.

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

HUB GROUP, INC.

(in thousands, except share amounts)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

HUB GROUP, INC.

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

HUB GROUP, INC.

(in thousands)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

HUB GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Hub Group, Inc. (“we”, “us” or “our”) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. However, we believe that the disclosures contained herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

The financial statements reflect, in our opinion, all material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly present our financial position as of September 30, 2014 and results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

These unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Results of operations in interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year due partially to seasonality.

We report two business segments, Hub and Mode, based on the way we manage, evaluate and internally report our business activities.

Hub offers comprehensive intermodal, truck brokerage and logistics services. Our employees operate the freight through a network of operating centers located in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Each operating center is strategically located in a market with a significant concentration of shipping customers and one or more railheads. Hub has full time employees located throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Mode has independent business owners who sell and operate the business throughout North America, as well as sales only agents. Mode also has a company managed operation and corporate offices in Dallas, TX, a temperature protected services division, Temstar, located in Oak Brook, IL and corporate offices in Memphis, TN.

Mode markets and operates its freight transportation services, consisting of intermodal, truck brokerage and logistics, primarily through agents who enter into contractual arrangements with Mode.

6

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of operating results and certain other financial data for our business segments (in thousands):

The following tables summarize our revenue by segment and business line (in thousands):

7

Table of Contents

The following tables summarize our revenue by segment and business line (in thousands):

8

Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of our earnings per share (in thousands, except for per share data):

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and long term debt materially approximated fair value as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

We consider as cash equivalents all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, our cash is with high quality financial institutions in DDAs (Demand Deposit Accounts).

Restricted investments included $21.6 million and $20.8 million as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, of mutual funds which are reported at fair value.

The fair value measurement of these securities is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets which are defined as “Level 1” of the fair value hierarchy in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the Codification.

We have standby letters of credit that expire at various dates in 2014 and 2015. As of September 30, 2014, our letters of credit were $6.1 million.

Our unused and available borrowings under our bank revolving line of credit were $43.9 million as of September 30, 2014 and $44.8 million as of December 31, 2013. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of September 30, 2014.

In 2014 we entered into various Equipment Notes (“Notes”) for the purchase of tractors and containers. The Notes are secured by the underlying equipment financed in the agreements.

9

Table of Contents

Our outstanding debt is as follows (in thousands):

As a recruiting tool for our owner-operators, we are guaranteeing certain company driver and owner-operators’ lease payments for tractors. The guarantees expire at various dates through 2020.

The potential maximum exposure under these lease guarantees was approximately $30.4 million and $39.0 million as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The potential maximum exposure represents the amount of the remaining lease payments on all outstanding guaranteed leases as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. However, upon default, we have the option to purchase the tractors. We could then sell the tractors and use the proceeds to recover all or a portion of the amounts paid under the guarantees. Alternatively, we can contract with another owner-operator who would assume the lease. There were no material defaults during the periods ended September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and no potential material defaults.

We had a liability of approximately $0.4 million as of September 30, 2014 and $0.7 million as of December 31, 2013, representing the fair value for estimated defaults of the guarantees, based on a discounted cash-flow analysis which is included in current and non-current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We are amortizing the amounts over the remaining lives of the respective guarantees.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, we exercised our purchase option on approximately 2,000 containers that are currently leased. The purchases totaling approximately $7.8 million will occur as the leases expire throughout 2014. As of September 30, 2014, we have purchased approximately 1,925 containers with the remaining 75 containers to be purchased in the fourth quarter for approximately $0.3 million.

In March 2014, we entered into an equipment purchase contract for the acquisition of 300 Freightliner tractors. The total purchase price of these tractors is approximately $39.3 million. As of October 16, 2014, we have received approximately 216 tractors. We expect to take delivery of the remaining units by the end of the year.

10

Table of Contents

In April 2014, we entered into equipment purchase contracts for the acquisition of up to 4,000 containers. We have decided to acquire 3,500 new 53’ containers at a total cost of $38.3 million. As of October 16, 2014, we have received approximately 2,694 containers. We expect to take delivery of the remaining units by the end of the year.

We intend to finance the purchase of the remaining new containers and tractors with secured fixed rate debt.

We are a party to litigation incident to our business, including claims for personal injury and/or property damage, bankruptcy preference claims, and claims regarding freight lost or damaged in transit, improperly shipped or improperly billed. Some of the lawsuits to which we are party are covered by insurance and are being defended by our insurance carriers. Some of the lawsuits are not covered by insurance and we defend those ourselves. We do not believe that the outcome of this litigation will have a materially adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

On January 25, 2013, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California (Sacramento Division) by Salvador Robles against our subsidiary, Comtrak Logistics, Inc., now known as Hub Group Trucking, Inc. Mr. Robles drove a truck for Hub Group Trucking in California, first as an independent contractor and then as an employee. The action seeks class certification on behalf of a class comprised of present and former California-based truck drivers for Hub Group Trucking who were classified as independent contractors, from January 2009 to the present. The complaint alleges Hub Group Trucking has misclassified such drivers as independent contractors and that such drivers were employees. The complaint asserts various violations of the California Labor Code and claims that Hub Group Trucking has engaged in unfair competition practices. The complaint seeks, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory damages and attorney’s fees. In May 2013, the complaint was amended to add similar claims based on Mr. Robles’ status as an employed company driver. These additional claims are only on behalf of Mr. Robles and not a putative class. In August 2013, the district court stayed proceedings in the case pending decisions by the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit to decide whether the claims in two cases raising some similar claims should be dismissed on federal preemption grounds. In July 2014, the Court of Appeals ruled that the claims in those cases were not preempted. The case is now proceeding. As previously reported in our 8-K filed on September 9, 2014, a second complaint alleging substantially similar claims was filed by Carlos Barillas against Hub Group Trucking in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino on July 24, 2014.

The Company believes that the California independent contractor truck drivers were properly classified as independent contractors at all times. Nevertheless, because lawsuits are expensive, time-consuming and could interrupt our business operations, we decided to make settlement offers to individual drivers with respect to the claims alleged in the Robles and Barillas lawsuits, without admitting liability. To date, 92% of the drivers have accepted the settlement offers. In the third quarter of 2014, the Hub segment recorded a charge of $10.3 million. This charge includes $9.3 million for payments made to drivers who have accepted the settlement offer and $1.0 million of related legal, communication and implementation costs. This charge is included in Driver settlements and related costs in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

On September 12, 2014, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division) by Christian Lubinski against Hub Group Trucking. The action seeks class certification on behalf of a class comprised of present and former owner-operators providing delivery services in Illinois for Hub Group Trucking. The complaint alleges Hub Group Trucking has misclassified such drivers as independent contractors and that such drivers are employees. The complaint alleges that Hub Group Trucking has made illegal deductions from the drivers’ pay and has failed to properly compensate the drivers for all hours worked, reimburse business expenses, pay employment taxes, and provide workers’ compensation and other employment benefits. The complaint asserts various violations of the Illinois Wage Payment and Collections Act and claims that Hub Group Trucking has been unjustly enriched. The complaint seeks, among other things, monetary damages for the relevant statutory period and attorneys’ fees.

11

Table of Contents

We cannot reasonably estimate at this time the possible loss or range of loss, if any, that may arise from the remaining unresolved claims in the Robles, Barillas and Lubinski lawsuits.

In the third quarter, the Hub segment recorded a full write-off of $11.9 million related to software development costs as a result of our decision to terminate a long-term technology project. Upon deployment in the third quarter, it was discovered that the software did not properly integrate with our current systems or meet the criteria for which it was designed. We do not believe the software can be cost effectively salvaged and it has no value on the open market. This charge is included in Impairment of software in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Update No. 2014-09—Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This Standard provides guidance on how to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For public organizations, the guidance in the update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The update provides two transition methods to the new guidance: a retrospective approach and a modified retrospective approach. Early application is not permitted. We plan to adopt this standard January 1, 2017, as required. We are currently evaluating the transition method and effect this update will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update to Topic 360 – Property, Plant and Equipment and Topic 205 – Presentation of Financial Statements: Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in the update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 25-20. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period and is to be applied prospectively. We plan to adopt this standard January 1, 2015, as required. We do not expect this new guidance to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

On October 22, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $75.0 million of our Class A Common Stock. This authorization expires December 31, 2015. We may make purchases from time to time as market conditions warrant, and any repurchased shares are expected to be held in treasury for future use.

12

Table of Contents

HUB GROUP, INC.

The information contained in this quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “expects,” “hopes,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and subject to risks. Such statements should be viewed with caution. Actual results or experience could differ materially from the forward-looking statements as a result of many factors. We assume no liability to update any such forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially include:

13

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Hub Group, Inc. (“we”, “us” or “our”) reports two distinct business segments, Hub and Mode. The Mode segment includes only the business we acquired on April 1, 2011. The Hub segment includes all business other than Mode. Hub Group (as opposed to just Hub), refers to the consolidated results for the whole company, including both the Mode and Hub segments. For the segment financial results, refer to Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements.

We are the largest intermodal marketing company (“IMC”) in the United States and a full service transportation provider offering intermodal, truck brokerage and logistics services. We operate through a nationwide network of operating centers and independent business owners.

As an IMC, we arrange for the movement of our customers’ freight in containers and trailers over long distances. We contract with railroads to provide transportation for the long-haul portion of the shipment and with local trucking companies, known as “drayage companies,” for local pickup and delivery. As part of the intermodal services, we negotiate rail and drayage rates, electronically track shipments in transit, consolidate billing and handle claims for freight loss or damage on behalf of our customers.

As of September 30, 2014, approximately 71% of Hub’s drayage needs were met by our subsidiary, Hub Group Trucking, Inc., which assists us in providing reliable, cost effective intermodal services to our customers. Hub Group Trucking has terminals in Atlanta, Birmingham, Charlotte, Chattanooga, Chicago, Cleveland, Columbus (OH), Dallas, Hammond (IN), Harrisburg, Huntsville, Indianapolis, Jacksonville, Kalamazoo, Kansas City, Milwaukee, Memphis, Nashville, Newark, Los Angeles, Perry (FL), Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Salt Lake City, Savannah, Seattle, St. Louis, Stockton, and Titusville (FL). As of September 30, 2014, Hub Group Trucking leased or owned 1,072 tractors, leased or owned 448 trailers, employed 1,047 drivers and contracted with 1,821 owner-operators.

We also arrange for the transportation of freight by truck, providing customers with another option for their transportation needs. We match the customers’ needs with carriers’ capacity to provide the most effective service and price combinations. As part of our truck brokerage services, we negotiate rates, track shipments in transit and handle claims for freight loss or damage on behalf of our customers.

Our logistics service consists of complex transportation management services, including load consolidation, mode optimization and carrier management. These service offerings are designed to take advantage of the increasing trend for shippers to outsource all or a greater portion of their transportation needs.

Hub has full time marketing representatives throughout North America who service local, regional and national accounts. We believe that fostering long-term customer relationships is critical to our success and allows us to better understand our customers’ needs and specifically tailor our transportation services to them.

Hub’s yield management group works with pricing and operations to enhance Hub’s customer margins. We are working on margin enhancement projects including matching up inbound and outbound loads, reducing empty miles, improving our recovery of accessorial costs, using Hub Group Trucking more, and eliminating or improving low contribution freight.

Hub’s top 50 customers represent approximately 63% of the Hub segment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. We use various performance indicators to manage our business. We closely monitor margin and gains and losses for our top 50 customers. We also evaluate on-time performance, cost per load and daily sales outstanding by customer account. Vendor cost changes and vendor service issues are also monitored closely.

14

Table of Contents

Mode has approximately 240 agents, consisting of 101 sales/operating agents, known as Independent Business Owners (“IBOs”), who sell and operate the business throughout North America and 139 sales only agents. Mode also has a company managed operation and corporate offices in Dallas, a temperature protected services division, Temstar, located in Oak Brook, IL and corporate offices in Memphis. Mode’s top 20 customers represent approximately 35% of the Mode segment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. We closely monitor revenue and margin for these customers. We believe Mode brings us highly complementary service offerings, more scale and a talented sales channel that allows us to better reach small and midsize customers.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

The following table summarizes our revenue by segment and business line (in thousands) for the three months ended September 30:

Revenue

Hub Group’s revenue increased 3.4% to $913.4 million in 2014 from $883.0 million in 2013.

The Hub segment revenue increased 2.0% to $691.8 million. Hub intermodal revenue decreased 2% to $460.9 million due to a 4% decline in volume and slightly lower fuel surcharges, partially offset by an increase in price and mix. Hub truck brokerage revenue decreased slightly to $84.2 million. Price, fuel and mix combined increased 12%, which was primarily due to a 10% increase in length of haul. Volume was down 12%. Hub logistics revenue increased 18% to $146.7 million due to growth with existing customers and customers we onboarded last year.

Mode’s revenue increased 12.9% to $245.4 million in 2014 from $217.4 million in 2013. Mode intermodal revenue increased 21% while Mode truck brokerage revenue increased 7% and Mode logistics revenue increased 3%. Mode’s intermodal volume increased 16% while truck brokerage saw increases in price and mix to offset a 7% volume decline. Mode’s logistics revenue increased 3% due to growth across multiple business lines.

15

Table of Contents

Gross Margin

Hub Group’s gross margin increased slightly to $93.2 million in 2014 from $93.1 million in 2013.

The Hub segment gross margin decreased 4.7% to $64.1 million. The intermodal and truck brokerage margin declines more than offset the increase in logistics gross margin. Intermodal margin declined because of rail service issues and increased drayage costs. Rail service severely impacted our third quarter results. Slower train speeds and late trains hurt fleet utilization by 1.4 days which led to higher repositioning and accessorial costs as well as more empty miles. Service problems were compounded by chassis shortages and insufficient gate reservations on the West Coast. Higher drayage costs also negatively impacted our third quarter profitability as a result of our business model change in California from independent contractors to employee drivers. In total, the rail and drayage issues impacted intermodal gross margin by approximately $6 million in the third quarter. Truck brokerage gross margin is down because of lower value added services. Logistics gross margin is up due to growth with customers we onboarded last year and existing customers. Hub’s gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased to 9.3% as compared to last year’s 9.9%. This decrease is due to lower yields in intermodal and truck brokerage slightly offset by an increase in logistics yield as a result of more cost effective purchasing.

Mode’s gross margin increased 12.4% to $29.1 million in 2014 from $25.9 million in 2013 due to growth in intermodal and truck brokerage. Mode’s gross margin as a percentage of revenue remained consistent at 11.9% in both 2014 and 2013.

CONSOLIDATED OPERATING EXPENSES

The following table includes certain items in the consolidated statements of income as a percentage of revenue:

Salaries and Benefits

Hub Group’s salaries and benefits decreased to $30.9 million in 2014 from $31.9 million in 2013. As a percentage of revenue, Hub Group’s salaries and benefits decreased to 3.4% in 2014 from 3.6% in 2013 due to increased revenue and lower costs.

16

Table of Contents

The Hub segment decrease of $0.8 million was due to decreases in employee bonuses of $2.0 million, due to our current estimate that no earnings per share based bonus will be earned in 2014, and commission expense of $0.3 million, partially offset by increases in salaries of $1.1 million, due to higher headcount and merit increases, and employee benefits of $0.4 million.

Mode’s salaries and benefits expense decreased to $3.4 million in 2014 from $3.6 million in 2013. The decrease was due primarily to decreases in both employee bonuses and salaries of $0.1 million each due to reduced headcount.

Hub Group’s headcount as of September 30, 2014 was 1,473, which excludes drivers, as driver costs are included in transportation costs. As of September 30, 2014, Mode had 124 employees.

Agent Fees and Commissions

Hub Group’s agent fees and commissions expense increased to $16.6 million in 2014 from $14.6 million in 2013. These expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 1.9% in 2014 from 1.6% in 2013.

The Hub segment agent fees and commissions expense decreased by $0.4 million in 2014 due to a smaller Hub agent program.

The Mode segment agent fees and commissions expense increase of $2.4 million was due to the increase in gross margin.

General and Administrative

Hub Group’s general and administrative expense increased to $13.9 million in 2014 from $13.8 million in 2013. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses decreased to 1.5% in 2014 from 1.6% in 2013.

The Hub segment increase of $0.1 million was due primarily to increases in repairs and maintenance expense, outside sales commissions and general insurance of $0.2 million each as well as travel and entertainment and other taxes, each for $0.1 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in rent expense of $0.5 million, equipment lease expense of $0.1 million and outside consultant expense of $0.1 million.

Mode’s general and administrative expense remained consistent at $1.7 million in both 2014 and 2013.

Depreciation and Amortization

Hub Group’s depreciation and amortization increased to $2.0 million in 2014 from $1.6 million in 2013. This expense as a percentage of revenue remained constant at 0.2% in both 2014 and 2013.

The Hub segment’s depreciation expense increased to $1.6 million in 2014 from $1.1 million in 2013. This increase was related primarily to depreciation for the new corporate headquarters and more depreciation related to computer software.

Mode’s depreciation expense decreased to $0.3 million in 2014 from $0.5 million in 2013. The decrease in expense was primarily related to less depreciation related to computer software.

Driver Settlements and Related Costs

In the third quarter of 2014, the Hub segment recorded a charge of $10.3 million. This charge includes $9.3 million in settlements for individual drivers and $1.0 million of related legal, communication and implementation costs. This expense as a percentage of revenue was 1.1% in 2014. See Note 8 of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements for more details.

17

Table of Contents

Impairment of Software

In the third quarter of 2014, the Hub segment recorded a charge of $11.9 million related to the write-off of software development costs as a result of our decision to terminate a long-term technology project. This expense as a percentage of revenue was 1.3% in 2014. See Note 9 of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements for more details.

Other Income (Expense)

Hub Group’s interest expense increased slightly to $0.4 million in 2014 from $0.3 million in 2013 due to higher debt.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes decreased to $2.9 million in 2014 from $12.4 million in 2013. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in pretax income. Our effective rate was 38.9% in 2014 and 39.9% in 2013. The 2014 rate was lower primarily due to the enactment of Pennsylvania income tax changes in July 2013 which increased our 2013 effective rate.

Net Income

Net income decreased to $4.5 million in 2014 from $18.6 million in 2013 due primarily to the driver settlements and related costs and the software impairment charge, partially offset by less income tax expense.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share were $0.12 in 2014 and $0.50 in 2013. Basic earnings per share decreased primarily due to the decrease in net income.

Diluted earnings per share were $0.12 in 2014 and $0.50 in 2013. Diluted earnings per share decreased primarily due to the decrease in net income.

18

Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

The following table summarizes our revenue by segment and business line (in thousands) for the nine months ended September 30: