ILLUMINA, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 29, 2013
or
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period from to .
|
||
Commission file number: 001-35406
Illumina, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
33-0804655
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
5200 Illumina Way
San Diego, California
|
92122
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (858) 202-4500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
As of
January 31, 2014
, there were
128.2 million
shares (excluding
47.5 million
shares held in treasury) of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding. The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), based on the closing price for the Common Stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on June 28, 2013 (the last trading day before June 30, 2013), was
$6.9 billion
. This amount excludes an aggregate of approximately
33.3 million
shares of Common Stock held by officers and directors and each person known by the registrant to own 10% or more of the outstanding Common Stock. Exclusion of shares held by any person should not be construed to indicate that such person possesses the power, directly or indirectly, to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the registrant, or that the registrant is controlled by or under common control with such person.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the
2014
annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Items 10 through 14 of Part III of this Report.
ILLUMINA, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 29, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
1
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements discuss our current expectations concerning future results or events, including our future financial performance. We make these forward-looking statements in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include, among others:
|
•
|
statements concerning our expectations as to our future financial performance, results of operations, or other operational results or metrics;
|
|
•
|
statements concerning the benefits that we expect will result from our business activities and certain transactions we have completed, such as product introductions, increased revenue, decreased expenses, and avoided expenses and expenditures; and
|
|
•
|
statements of our expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated developments (including new products and services), and other matters that are not historical facts.
|
These statements may be made expressly in this document or may be incorporated by reference to other documents we have filed or will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. You can identify many of these statements by looking for words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should,” or “will” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology and similar references to future periods. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties that may cause actual results or events to be materially different from any future results or events expressed or implied by us in those statements. Many of the factors that will determine or affect these results or events are beyond our ability to control or project. Specific factors that could cause actual results or events to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include:
|
•
|
our ability to maintain our revenue levels and profitability during periods of research funding reduction or uncertainty and adverse economic and business conditions, including as a result of slowing or uncertain economic growth in the United States or worldwide;
|
|
•
|
our ability to further develop and commercialize our instruments and consumables and to deploy new products, services, and applications, and expand the markets, for our technology platforms;
|
|
•
|
our ability to manufacture robust instrumentation and consumables;
|
|
•
|
our ability to successfully identify and integrate acquired technologies, products, or businesses;
|
|
•
|
our expectations and beliefs regarding future prospects and growth of the business and the markets in which we operate;
|
|
•
|
the assumptions underlying our critical accounting policies and estimates;
|
|
•
|
our assessments and estimates that determine our effective tax rate;
|
|
•
|
our assessments and beliefs regarding the future outcome of pending legal proceedings and the liability, if any, that we may incur as a result of those proceedings; and
|
|
•
|
other factors detailed in our filings with the SEC, including the risks, uncertainties, and assumptions described in Item 1A “Risk Factors” below, or in information disclosed in public conference calls, the date and time of which are released beforehand.
|
Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this annual report. We undertake no obligation, and do not intend, to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, to review or confirm analysts’ expectations, or to provide interim reports or updates on the progress of any current financial quarter, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this annual report. Given these uncertainties, we caution investors not to unduly rely on our forward-looking statements.
2
Available Information
Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge on our website,
www.illumina.com
. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report. Such reports are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with, or furnishing to, the SEC. The SEC also maintains an Internet site at
www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that electronically file with the SEC. Copies of our annual report on Form 10-K will be made available, free of charge, upon written request.
_______________________________________
Illumina®, illuminaDx, BaseSpace®, BeadArray, BeadXpress®, BlueGnome®, cBot, CSPro®, DASL®, DesignStudio, Epicentre®, GAIIx, Genetic Energy, Genome Analyzer, GenomeStudio®, GoldenGate®, HiScan®, HiSeq®, HiSeq X, Infinium®, iSelect®, MiSeq®, MiSeqDx, NeoPrep, NextBio®, Nextera®, NextSeq, SeqMonitor, Solexa®, TruGenome, TruSeq®, TruSight, Understand Your Genome, UYG, VeraCode®, the pumpkin orange color, and the Genetic Energy streaming bases design are certain of our trademarks. This report also contains brand names, trademarks, or service marks of companies other than Illumina, and these brand names, trademarks, and service marks are the property of their respective holders.
_______________________________________
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this annual report on Form 10-K to “Illumina,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Illumina, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
3
ITEM 1.
Business.
Overview
We are a leading developer, manufacturer, and marketer of life science tools and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variation and function. We were incorporated in California in April 1998 and reincorporated in Delaware in July 2000. Our principal executive offices are located at 5200 Illumina Way, San Diego, California 92122. Our telephone number is (858) 202-4500.
Using our proprietary technologies, we provide innovative sequencing- and array-based solutions for genotyping, copy number variation analysis, methylation studies, and gene expression profiling of DNA and RNA. Our customers include leading genomic research centers, academic institutions, government laboratories, hospitals, and reference laboratories as well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, commercial molecular diagnostic, and consumer genomics companies.
Our broad portfolio of systems, consumables, and analysis tools are designed to accelerate and simplify genetic analysis. This portfolio addresses a range of genomic complexity, price points, and throughputs, enabling customers to select the best solution for their scientific challenge. Our leading edge sequencing instruments can be used to efficiently perform a range of nucleic acid (DNA, RNA) analyses on large numbers of samples. For more focused studies, our array-based solutions provide ideal tools to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) involving single-nucleotide polymorphism, genotyping and copy number variation analyses, as well as gene expression profiling, and other DNA and RNA studies.
To provide our customers with more comprehensive sample-to-answer workflow solutions, we acquired: NextBio, a leader in clinical and genomic informatics, in November 2013; Advanced Liquid Logic Inc., a leader in digital microfluidics and liquid handling solutions, in July 2013; and Epicentre Technologies Corporation, a leading provider of nucleic acid sample preparation reagents and specialty enzymes for sequencing and microarray applications, in 2011.
Over the last two years, we have taken significant steps to support our goal of becoming a leader in the reproductive health market by acquiring Verinata Health, Inc. (Verinata) in February 2013 and BlueGnome Ltd. (BlueGnome) in 2012. Our acquisition of Verinata further strengthened our focus on reproductive health by adding to our portfolio Verinata’s verifi® prenatal test, a comprehensive non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) for high-risk pregnancies, and what we believe to be the most comprehensive intellectual property portfolio in the NIPT industry. Our acquisition of BlueGnome, a leading provider of genetic solutions for the screening of chromosomal abnormalities and genetic variations associated with developmental delay, cancer, and infertility, expanded our ability to establish integrated solutions in reproductive health and cancer.
Industry Background
Genetics Primer
The instruction set for all living cells is encoded in deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, with the complete set of DNA for any organism referred to as its genome. DNA contains small regions called genes, which comprise a string of nucleotide bases labeled A, C, G, and T, representing adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine, respectively. These nucleotide bases are present in a precise order known as the DNA sequence. When a gene is “expressed,” a partial copy of its DNA sequence - called messenger RNA (mRNA) - is used as a template to direct the synthesis of a particular protein. Proteins, in turn, direct all cellular function. The illustration below is a simplified gene expression schematic.
4
Variations among organisms are due, in large part, to differences in their DNA sequences. Changes caused by insertions, deletions, inversions, translocations, or duplications of nucleotide bases may result in certain genes becoming over-expressed (excessive protein production), under-expressed (reduced protein production), or silenced altogether, sometimes triggering changes in cellular function. These changes can be the result of heredity, but most often they occur at random. The most common form of variation in humans is called a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), which is a variation in a single position of a nucleotide base in a DNA sequence. Copy number variations (CNVs) occur when there are fewer or more copies of certain genes, segments of a gene, or stretches of DNA.
In humans, genetic variation accounts for many of the physical differences we see (e.g., height, hair, eye color, etc.). More importantly, these genetic variations can have medical consequences affecting disease susceptibility, including predisposition to complex genetic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. They can also impact an individual’s response to certain drug treatments, causing them to respond well, not respond at all, or experience adverse side effects - an area of study known as pharmacogenomics.
Scientists are studying these variations and their consequences in humans, as well as a broad range of animals, plants, and microorganisms. Researchers investigating human, viral, and bacterial genetic variation are helping us to better understand the mechanisms of disease, and thereby develop more effective therapeutics and diagnostics. Greater insight into genetic variation in plants (e.g., food and biofuel crops) and animals (e.g., livestock and domestic animals) is enabling scientists to improve crop yields and animal breeding programs.
The methods for studying genetic variation and biological function include sequencing, SNP genotyping, CNV analysis, gene expression profiling, and gene regulation and epigenetic analysis, each of which is addressed by our breadth of products and services.
Life Sciences Research Primer
Life science research encompasses the study of all living things, from humans, animals, and plants, to viruses and bacteria. It is being performed in government, university, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and agrigenomics laboratories around the world, where scientists are seeking to expand our knowledge of the biological functions essential for life. Beginning at the genetic level, where our tools are used to elucidate the correlation between gene sequence and biological processes, life science research expands to include the study of the cells, tissues, organs, systems, and other components that make up living organisms. This research supports development of new, more effective clinical diagnostics and medicines to improve human health, as well as advances in agriculture and animal husbandry to meet the world’s growing needs for food and energy.
Molecular Diagnostics Primer
Molecular diagnostic assays (or tests) are designed to identify the biological indicators linked with disease and drug response, providing physicians with information to more effectively diagnose, treat, and monitor both acute and chronic disease conditions. They are an integral part of personalized healthcare, where the unique makeup of each individual can be taken into account in diagnosing disease and managing treatment through the use of precision therapies. Biological indicators that can be measured by these assays include protein or gene expression, methylation levels, copy number variations, and the presence or absence of a specific gene or group of genes.
5
There are molecular diagnostics assays in development and on the market, including assays for infectious disease, cancer, and heart disease, as well as molecular-based drug metabolism and response assays to help physicians understand a patient’s disease risk profile or to select the most effective therapy with the fewest side effects. Our innovative technologies and products are contributing to the development of a wide range of genomic-based molecular diagnostics assays, including our own FDA-cleared MiSeqDx Cystic Fibrosis System, which offers a complete solution for accurate, comprehensive cystic fibrosis testing.
Increased public knowledge about ancestral and genealogical information derived from genomic data and the clinical relevance of genetic markers has prompted consumer interest in having personal genomes analyzed, sparking the development of the consumer genomics market. Several companies, including Illumina, now offer personal sequencing or genotyping services, working with physician groups and genetic counselors to interpret the results for consumers.
We believe the growth in consumer genomics and the use of genomic-based diagnostic assays will trigger a fundamental shift in the practice of medicine and the economics of the pharmaceutical industry and health care by facilitating an increased emphasis on preventative and predictive molecular medicine, ushering in the era of personalized healthcare.
Our Principal Markets
We believe that genomics will play an increasingly important role in molecular biology, and that by empowering genetic analysis, our tools will advance disease research, drug development, and the creation of molecular diagnostic tests. In addition to developing sequencing- and array-based solutions for life science, applied, and consumer genomics markets, we are facilitating the transition of sequencing to the clinic, by supporting and carrying out clinical trials to gather data for regulatory submissions in the United States and globally, and establishing infrastructure to offer products designed and manufactured in compliance with global quality standards for medical devices. Effective December 30, 2013, we realigned our business to target the markets and customers outlined below on a more comprehensive basis.
Life Sciences
Historically, our core business has been in the life sciences research market, which consists of laboratories generally associated with universities, medical research centers, and government institutions, as well as biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. Researchers at these institutions are using our products and services in a broad spectrum of scientific activities, such as: next-generation sequencing, mid-to-high-complexity genotyping and gene expression (for whole-genome discovery and profiling), and low complexity genotyping and gene expression (for high-throughput targeted screening). Sequencing is growing the most rapidly among these three areas due to the improved performance of next generation sequencing technologies. It is fueled by private and public funding, new global initiatives to broadly characterize genetic variation, and the migration of legacy genetic applications to sequencing-based technologies.
We also provide products and services for other life sciences applied markets, such as the agricultural genomics market, where government and corporate researchers use our sequencing- and array-based tools to accelerate and enhance agricultural research to help identify desirable traits in plants and animals, leading to healthier and more productive crops and livestock.
Reproductive and Genetic Health
Our technologies and products provide reproductive health solutions ranging from preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), as well as neonatal and genetic health testing. Our PGS solutions are used in connection with in-vitro fertilizations (IVF) to determine, before implantation, whether an embryo has an abnormal number of chromosomes, which is a major cause of IVF failure and miscarriages. In IVF cases where there is a family history of disease or when one or both parents are carriers for certain genetic conditions, our PGD solutions identify, before implantation, which embryos have genes associated with severe genetic disorders. Our NIPT solutions provide non-invasive tests for early identification of fetal chromosomal abnormalities by analyzing cell-free DNA in maternal blood, and our neonatal and carrier screening solutions provide early identification of genetic disorders in newborns as well as adults who are considering their reproductive options.
Oncology
Cancer is a disease of the genome, and the goal of cancer genomics is to identify genomic changes that transform a normal cell into a cancerous one. Understanding these genomic changes may lead to a more accurate diagnosis, a better understanding of the prognosis, and the selection of individually targeted therapies. Our sequencing- and array-based solutions provide researchers and clinicians in the research, translational, and clinical oncology markets with tools to identify the
6
molecular changes in a tumor, during all stages of tumor progression, transform discoveries into new treatments or therapies for cancer patients, and create diagnostic tests to identify patients most likely to be helped or harmed by a particular treatment or therapy.
Enterprise Informatics
Enterprise informatics solutions increase the utility of genomic data by providing tools that allow customers to analyze, archive, and share genomic data. The integration of our instruments with data analysis software solutions allow customers to go from raw genomic data to meaningful results. Our BaseSpace genomics analysis platform, which can be hosted onsite or in a cloud-based system, integrates directly with our sequencing instruments to streamline sequencing-data analysis, facilitate data sharing, provide data storage solutions, and provide access to a growing number of data analysis applications.
In 2013, we acquired NextBio, which provides a platform for aggregating and analyzing large quantities of genomic and phenotypic data for research and clinical applications. Ultimately, we believe that large-scale genomic databases containing both genomic and phenotypic information will enhance the value of human genome sequencing and accelerate the pace of discovery.
New and Emerging Markets
Our markets are characterized by rapid change and innovation brought about by next generation sequencing, and new applications and opportunities appear and evolve quickly. Through our new and emerging market business unit we assess new opportunities against our corporate strategies and consider whether there is a compelling unmet need and the opportunity to transform the market with our products and services. Some of the markets that provide immediate and near-term opportunities to expand the use of next generation sequencing include: transplant diagnostics, where sequencing is used to evaluate donor and patient compatibility; forensic genomics, where sequencing is used to investigate criminal cases; consumer genomics, where genotyping is primarily used to reveal ancestry and genealogical linkage information; and population sequencing, where sequencing is used to catalogue the complete spectrum of genetic variation in large populations.
Our Principal Technologies
Our unique technology platforms enable the scale of experimentation necessary for population-scale studies, genome-wide discovery, target selection, and validation studies (see Figure 1 below). More than 10,000 customer-authored scientific papers have been published to date using these technologies, representing the efforts of a large and dynamic Illumina user community. Through rapid innovation, we are changing the economics of genetic research, enabling projects that were previously considered unapproachable.
Figure 1: Illumina Platform Overview:
7
Sequencing Technology
DNA sequencing is the process of determining the order of nucleotide bases (A, C, G, or T) in a DNA sample. Our portfolio of sequencing platforms represents a family of systems that we believe are setting the standard for productivity, cost-effectiveness, and accuracy among next-generation sequencing technologies. They are used by customers to perform whole-genome, de novo, exome, and targeted re-sequencing of genomes, and to analyze specific gene regions and genes.
Whole-genome sequencing determines an organism’s complete DNA sequence. In de novo sequencing, the goal is to sequence a representative sample from a species never before sequenced. In targeted re-sequencing, a sequence of nucleotide bases is compared to a standard or reference sequence from a previously sequenced species to identify changes that reflect genetic variation. Understanding the similarities and differences in DNA sequence between and within species furthers our understanding of the function of the structures encoded in the DNA.
Our DNA sequencing technology is based on our proprietary reversible terminator-based sequencing chemistry, referred to as sequencing by synthesis (SBS) biochemistry, and tracks the addition of labeled nucleotides as the DNA chain is copied - in a massively parallel fashion. Our SBS sequencing technology provides researchers with a broad range of applications and the ability to sequence even large mammalian genomes in days rather than weeks or years. Our highest throughput sequencing instrument, the HiSeq X, has the ability to generate up to 1.8 terabases (Tb) (16 human genomes) of DNA sequence in less than three days. Since the launch of our first sequencing system in 2007, our systems have reduced the cost of sequencing by more than a factor of 10,000 and decreased the sequencing time per gigabase (Gb) by nearly a factor of 2,000.
BeadArray Technology
Our BeadArray technology combines microscopic beads and a substrate in a proprietary manufacturing process to produce arrays that can perform many assays simultaneously, enabling large-scale analysis of genetic variation and biological function in a unique high-throughput, cost effective, and flexible manner. The arrays manufactured using BeadArray technology are imaged by our HiScan and iScan systems for a broad range of DNA and RNA analysis applications including SNP discovery, SNP genotyping, CNV analysis, gene expression analysis, and methylation analysis.
Our proprietary BeadArray technology consists of microscopic silica beads, with each bead covered with hundreds of thousands of copies of oligonucleotides, or oligos, that act as the capture sequences in one of our assays. We deploy our BeadArray technology on BeadChips - silicon wafers the size of a microscope slide, with varying numbers of sample sites per slide. BeadChips are chemically etched to create tens of millions of wells for each sample site.
Using our BeadArray technology, we achieve high-throughput analysis with a high density of test sites per array, and are able to format arrays in various configurations. We seek to maximize cost effectiveness by reducing use of expensive consumables and valuable samples, and through the low manufacturing costs associated with our technologies. Our ability to vary the size, shape, and format of the well patterns and to create specific bead pools for different applications provides the flexibility to address multiple markets and market segments.
Our Products
Our products give our customers the ability to analyze the genome at any level of complexity, from whole-genome sequencing to targeted panels, and enable us to serve a number of markets, including research, agriculture, reproductive and genetic health, oncology, pharmaceuticals, commercial molecular diagnostic, and consumer genomics companies.
The majority of our product sales consist of instruments and consumables (which include reagents, flow cells, and BeadChips) based on our proprietary technologies. For the fiscal years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, instrument sales comprised
26%
,
27%
, and
35%
, respectively, of total revenues, and consumable sales represented
62%
,
64%
, and
56%
, respectively, of total revenues.
Sequencing Platforms
Based on our proprietary SBS technology, our next-generation sequencing platforms are designed to meet the workflow, output, and accuracy demands of a full range of sequencing applications. Our sequencing platforms can generate between 500 Mb and 1.8 Tb of genomic data, depending on the instrument and application, at different price points per Gb and for different applications ranging from small genome, amplicon, and targeted gene panel sequencing to population-scale whole human genome sequencing.
8
Array Platforms
The HiScan and iScan Systems are dedicated array scanners that support the rapid, sensitive, and accurate imaging of our array-based genetic analysis products. They incorporate high-performance lasers, optics, and detection systems, delivering sub-micron resolution and unmatched throughput rates. The HiScan and iScan support our Infinium, GoldenGate, DASL, gene expression, and methylation assays.
Consumables
We have developed a variety of sample preparation and sequencing kits to simplify workflows and accelerate analysis. Our sequencing applications include whole-genome sequencing kits, which enable sequencing of entire genomes of any size and complexity, and targeted resequencing kits, which enable sequencing of exomes, specific genes, or other genomic regions of interest. Our sequencing kits enable researchers to extend read lengths, achieve higher Gb of mappable data, and deliver the highest yield of perfect reads to maximize the ability to accurately characterize the target genome. Through our acquisition of Epicentre Technologies Corporation in 2011, we acquired the proprietary Nextera technology for next-generation sequencing library preparation. This technology has enabled us to offer sequencing library preparation kits with lower sample input requirements that greatly simplify genetic analysis workflows and significantly reduce the time from sample preparation to answer.
Our array-based genotyping consumables enable customers to perform a wide-range of analyses, including analyzing diversity across a species, disease-related mutations, and genetic characteristics associated with cancer. Customers may select from a range of human, animal, and agriculturally relevant genome panels or create their own custom arrays that can be used to investigate up to 1,000,000 genetic markers targeting any species.
Our Services
In addition to the products we supply to customers, we also provide genotyping and whole genome sequencing services through our CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited laboratory.
FastTrack Services
One of the ways in which we compete and extend the reach of our systems in the genetic analysis market is to deliver services that leverage our proprietary technologies and the expertise of our scientists to perform genotyping and sequencing services for our customers. We began offering genotyping services to academic institutions, biotechnology, and pharmaceutical customers in 2002, and we expanded to deliver sequencing services in 2007. Using our FastTrack services, customers can perform whole-genome sequencing projects (including phasing and long-read sequencing services) and microarray projects (including whole-genome association studies, DNA copy number studies, linkage analysis, fine mapping, and DNA methylation studies).
Service Partnership Programs
To complement our own service capabilities, we have developed partnered programs such as our Certified Service Providers (CSPro) and Illumina Genome Network (IGN), to create a world-wide network of Illumina technology-enabled service offerings that broaden our market reach. Illumina CSPro is a collaborative service partnership established between Illumina and leading genome centers and research laboratories to ensure the delivery of high-quality genetic analysis services. It provides a competitive advantage for service providers, while also ensuring that customers will receive Illumina data quality and service. To become a CSPro provider, participating laboratories must complete a three-phased Illumina certification process. There are more than 90 Illumina CSPro-certified organizations worldwide providing sequencing, genotyping, and gene expression services using our technologies and products.
Introduced in 2010, the IGN links researchers interested in conducting large whole genome sequencing projects with leading institutes worldwide that possess our next-generation sequencing technology. The IGN provides a cost-effective and dependable way to complete large sequencing projects. All IGN partners are experienced and well-published using Illumina technology, and each has completed Illumina’s Certified Service Provider (CSPro) certification. Each IGN partner possesses ten or more high-throughput Illumina sequencing systems, providing the scalability to handle even the largest sequencing projects with rapid completion times. Current members include: British Columbia Cancer Agency’s Genome Sciences Centre; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology; Macrogen; the Northwest Genomics Center at the University of Washington; the New York Genome Center; Takara Bio; and Illumina’s own FastTrack Services.
9
Individual Genome Sequencing
Since June 2009, Illumina's Clinical Services Laboratory has been offering personal genome sequencing from our CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited laboratory using Illumina next-generation sequencing technology. We offer a variety of individual sequencing options, including: the TruGenome Undiagnosed Disease Test, which aids in the diagnosis of inherited diseases of a single-gene; the TruGenome Predisposition Screen, which evaluates carrier status and enables patient-physician discussions about managing risk for a pre-defined set of adult-onset conditions; and TruGenome Technical Sequence Data, which provides whole-genome sequencing services for situations where the physician is able to analyze and interpret whole-genome sequencing data. For each service, individuals are required to follow our physician-mediated process, which involves pre-service consultation and informed consent that includes review of the information potentially to be learned in the report. The final genome data is returned to the physician who then meets with the patient and discusses implications and possible actions based on the results.
Intellectual Property
We have an extensive intellectual property portfolio, including, as of February 1, 2014, ownership of, or exclusive licenses to, 402 issued U.S. patents and 383 pending U.S. patent applications, including 22 allowed applications that have not yet issued as patents. Our issued patents include those directed to various aspects of our arrays, assays, oligo synthesis, sequencing technology, instruments, and chemical detection technologies, and have terms that expire between 2014 and 2032. We continue to file new patent applications to protect the full range of our technologies. We have filed or have been granted counterparts for many of these patents and applications in foreign countries.
We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, copyright, and trademark protection, as well as continuing technological innovation and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our competitive position. Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain patent protection for our products and processes, to preserve our trade secrets, to enforce our patents, copyrights and trademarks, to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties, and to acquire licenses related to enabling technology or products.
We are party to various exclusive and non-exclusive license agreements and other arrangements with third parties that grant us rights to use key aspects of our array and sequencing technologies, assay methods, chemical detection methods, reagent kits, and scanning equipment. Our exclusive licenses expire with the termination of the underlying patents, which will occur between 2014 and 2020. We have additional nonexclusive license agreements with various third parties for other components of our products. In most cases, the agreements remain in effect over the term of the underlying patents, may be terminated at our request without further obligation, and require that we pay customary royalties while the agreement is in effect.
Research and Development
We have made substantial investments in research and development since our inception. We have assembled a team of skilled scientists and engineers who are specialists in biology, chemistry, informatics, instrumentation, optical systems, software, manufacturing, and other related areas required to complete the development of our products. Our research and development efforts have focused primarily on the tasks required to optimize and support commercialization of the products and services derived from our technologies.
Our research and development expenses for fiscal
2013
,
2012
, and
2011
were
$276.7 million
,
$231.0 million
, and
$196.9 million
, respectively. We expect research and development expense to increase during
2014
to support the growth of our business and as we continue to expand our research and product development efforts.
Marketing and Distribution
Our current products address the genetic analysis portion of the life sciences market, in particular, experiments involving sequencing, SNP genotyping, and gene expression profiling. These experiments include many areas of biologic research, including basic human disease research, pharmaceutical drug discovery and development, pharmacogenomics, toxicogenomics, and animal and agricultural research. Our potential customers include leading genomic research centers, academic institutions, government laboratories, hospitals, reference laboratories, and clinical research organizations, as well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, commercial molecular diagnostic, and consumer genomics companies.
We market and distribute our products directly to customers in North America, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific region. In each of these areas, we have dedicated sales, service, and application support personnel responsible for expanding and managing their respective customer bases. In addition, in certain markets within Europe, the Asia-Pacific
10
region, Latin America, the Middle East, and South Africa we sell our products and provide services to customers through distributors that specialize in life science products. We expect to continue to increase our sales and distribution resources during
2014
and beyond as we launch a number of new products and expand the number of customers that can use our products.
Manufacturing
We manufacture sequencing and array platforms, reagent kits, and scanning equipment. Our manufacturing capacity for consumables and instruments has grown during 2013 to support increased customer demand. We are exploring ways to increase the level of automation in the manufacturing process to continue to accelerate throughput and improve the quality and manufacturing yield as we increase the complexity of our products. We adhere to access and safety standards required by federal, state, and local health ordinances, such as standards for the use, handling, and disposal of hazardous substances. Our key manufacturing and distribution facilities operate under a quality management system certified to ISO 13485, which demonstrates the organization’s ability to provide medical devices and related services that consistently meet customer and applicable regulatory requirements.
Raw Materials
Our manufacturing operations require a wide variety of raw materials, electronic and mechanical components, chemical and biochemical materials, and other supplies. We have multiple commercial sources for many of our components and supplies; however, there are some raw materials and components that we obtain from single source suppliers. To mitigate potential risks arising from single source suppliers, we believe that we can redesign our products for alternative components or use alternative reagents, if required. In addition, while we generally attempt to keep our inventory at minimal levels, we purchase incremental inventory as circumstances warrant to protect our supply chain.
Competition
Although we believe that our products and services provide significant advantages over products and services currently available from other sources, we expect to continue to encounter intense competition from other companies that offer products and services for sequencing, SNP genotyping, gene expression, and molecular diagnostics markets. These include companies such as Affymetrix, Inc.; Agilent Technologies, Inc.; BGI; Luminex Corporation; Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.; QIAGEN N.V.; Roche Holding AG.; and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., among others. Some of these companies have or will have substantially greater financial, technical, research, and other resources and larger, more established marketing, sales, distribution, and service organizations than we do. In addition, they may have greater name recognition than we do in the markets we address and in some cases a larger installed base of systems. Each of these markets is very competitive and we expect new competitors to emerge and the intensity of competition to increase. In order to effectively compete with these companies, we will need to demonstrate that our products have superior throughput, cost, and accuracy advantages over competing products.
Segment and Geographic Information
In accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance for segment reporting, we have determined that we have one operating segment for purposes of recording and reporting our financial results.
We currently sell our products to a number of customers outside the United States, including customers in other areas of North America, Latin America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Shipments to customers outside the United States totaled
$706.5 million
, or
50%
of our total revenue, during fiscal
2013
, compared to
$580.1 million
, or
51%
, and
$526.8 million
, or
50%
, in fiscal
2012
and
2011
, respectively. The U.S. dollar has been determined to be the functional currency of the Company’s international operations due to the primary economic environment of our foreign subsidiaries. We expect that sales to international customers will continue to be an important and growing source of revenue. See note “13. Segment Information, Geographic Data, and Significant Customers” in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information concerning our foreign and domestic operations.
Backlog
Our backlog was approximately
$330 million
and
$260 million
at
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, respectively. Generally, our backlog consists of orders believed to be firm as of the balance sheet date; however, we may allow customers to make product substitutions as we launch new products. The timing of shipments depends on several factors, including agreed upon shipping schedules, which may span multiple quarters, and whether the product is catalog or custom.
11
We expect the majority of the backlog as of
December 29, 2013
, to be shipped within the fiscal year ending
December 28, 2014
. Although we generally recognize revenue upon the transfer of title to a customer, we may be required to defer the recognition of revenue even after title transfer depending on the specific arrangement with a customer and the applicable accounting treatment.
Seasonality
Historically, demand for our products is affected by a number of variables, namely spending associated with the end of the U.S. government fiscal year as well as the end of the calendar year, and lower consumable utilization during the summer vacation months in Europe. During 2013, we saw sequential revenue growth due to demand for our innovative products and a slight benefit from calendar year-end spending.
Environmental Matters
We are committed to the protection of our employees and the environment. Our operations require the use of hazardous materials that subject us to a variety of federal, state, and local environmental and safety laws and regulations. We believe we are in material compliance with current applicable laws and regulations; however, we could be held liable for damages and fines should contamination of the environment or individual exposures to hazardous substances occur. In addition, we cannot predict how changes in these laws and regulations, or the development of new laws and regulations, will affect our business operations or the cost of compliance.
Government Regulation
As we continue to expand our product lines to encompass products that are intended to be used for the diagnosis of disease, regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and other countries will be a significant factor in the development, testing, production, and marketing of such products. Products that we develop in the molecular diagnostic markets, depending on their intended use, will be regulated as medical devices by the FDA and comparable agencies of other countries and may require either receiving clearance following a pre-market notification process, also known as a 510(k) clearance, or premarket approval (PMA), from the FDA prior to marketing. Obtaining the requisite regulatory approvals can be expensive and may involve considerable delay.
The shorter 510(k) clearance process, which we utilized for our FDA-cleared MiSeqDx instrument, generally takes from three to six months after submission, but it can take significantly longer. The 510(k) submission process may be utilized if it is demonstrated that the new product is “substantially equivalent” to a similar product that has already been cleared by the FDA. The longer PMA process, which we intend to use for an IVD version of our HiSeq 2500 system, is much more costly, uncertain, and generally takes from nine months to one year after filing, but it can take significantly longer. Because we cannot be certain that any molecular diagnostic products that we develop will be subject to the shorter 510(k) clearance process, or will ultimately be approved at all, the regulatory approval process for such products may be significantly delayed and may be significantly more expensive than anticipated. If we fail to obtain, or experience significant delays in obtaining, regulatory approvals for molecular diagnostic products that we develop, we may not be able to launch or successfully commercialize such products in a timely manner, or at all.
Changes to the current regulatory framework, including the imposition of additional or new regulations, could arise at any time during the development or marketing of our products, which may negatively affect our ability to obtain or maintain FDA or comparable regulatory approval of our products, if required.
In addition, if our products labeled as “Research Use Only,” or RUO, are used, or could be used, for the diagnosis of disease, the regulatory requirements related to marketing, selling, and supporting such products could be uncertain, even if such use by our customers is without our consent. If the FDA or other regulatory authorities assert that any of our RUO products are subject to regulatory clearance or approval, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Employees
As of
December 29, 2013
, we had
more than 3,000
employees. We consider our employee relations to be positive. Our success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain employees. In addition, we employ a number of temporary and contract employees. We face competition in this regard from other companies, research and academic institutions, government entities, and other organizations.
12
|
ITEM 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
Our business is subject to various risks, including those described below. In addition to the other information included in this Form 10-K, the following issues could adversely affect our operating results or our stock price.
If we do not successfully manage the development, manufacturing, and launch of new products or
services, including product transitions, our financial results could be adversely
affected.
We face risks associated with launching new products and pre-announcing products and services when the products or services have not been fully developed or tested. For instance, in January 2014 we announced significant additions to our instrument platforms, the HiSeq X Ten and the NextSeq 500, which include dramatic technology advances. If our products and services are not able to deliver the performance or results expected by our target markets or are not delivered on a timely basis, our reputation and credibility may suffer. If we encounter development challenges or discover errors in our products late in our development cycle, we may delay the product launch date. In addition, we may experience difficulty in managing or forecasting customer reactions, purchasing decisions, or transition requirements or programs (such as trade-in programs) with respect to newly launched products (or products in development) relative to our existing products, which could adversely affect sales of our existing products. The expenses or losses associated with unsuccessful product development or launch activities or lack of market acceptance of our new products could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
We face intense competition, which could render our products obsolete, result in significant price reductions, or substantially limit the volume of products that we sell.
We compete with life sciences companies that design, manufacture, and market products for analysis of genetic variation and biological function and other applications using a wide-range of competing technologies. We anticipate that we will continue to face increased competition as existing companies develop new or improved products and as new companies enter the market with new technologies. One or more of our competitors may render our technology obsolete or uneconomical. Some of our competitors have greater financial and personnel resources, broader product lines, a more established customer base, and more experience in research and development than we do. Furthermore, life sciences and pharmaceutical companies, which are our potential customers and strategic partners, could also develop competing products. We believe that customers in our markets display a significant amount of loyalty to their initial supplier of a particular product; therefore, it may be difficult to generate sales to potential customers who have purchased products from competitors. To the extent we are unable to be the first to develop or supply new products, our competitive position may suffer.
The market for molecular diagnostics products is currently limited and highly competitive, with several large companies already having significant market share, intellectual property portfolios, and regulatory expertise. Established diagnostic companies also have an installed base of instruments in several markets, including clinical and reference laboratories, which could deter acceptance of our products. In addition, some of these companies have formed alliances with genomics companies that provide them access to genetic information that may be incorporated into their diagnostic tests.
Our continued growth is dependent on continuously developing and commercializing new
products.
Our target markets are characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, changes in customer needs, existing and emerging competition, strong price competition, and frequent new product introductions. Accordingly, our continued growth depends on continuously developing and commercializing new products and services, including improving our existing products and services, in order to address evolving market requirements on a timely basis. If we fail to innovate or adequately invest in new technologies, our products and services will become dated, and we could lose our competitive position in the markets that we serve as customers purchase new products offered by our competitors. We believe that successfully introducing new products and technologies in our target markets on a timely basis provides a significant competitive advantage because customers make an investment of time in selecting and learning to use a new product and may be reluctant to switch once that selection is made.
To the extent that we fail to introduce new and innovative products, or such products are not accepted in the market or suffer significant delays in development, we may lose market share to our competitors, which will be difficult or impossible to regain. An inability, for technological or other reasons, to develop successfully and timely introduce new products could reduce our growth rate or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business. In the past, we have experienced, and are likely to experience in the future, delays in the development and introduction of new products. There can be no assurance that we will keep pace with the rapid rate of change in our markets or that our new products will adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace, achieve market acceptance, or compete successfully with competing technologies. Some of the factors affecting market acceptance of new products and services include:
13
|
•
|
availability, quality, and price relative to competing products and services;
|
|
•
|
the functionality and performance of new and existing products and services;
|
|
•
|
the timing of introduction of new products or services relative to competing products and services;
|
|
•
|
scientists’ and customers’ opinions of the utility of new products or services;
|
|
•
|
citation of new products or services in published research;
|
|
•
|
regulatory trends and approvals; and
|
|
•
|
general trends in life sciences research and applied markets.
|
We may also have to write off excess or obsolete inventory if sales of our products are not consistent with our expectations or the market requirements for our products change due to technical innovations in the marketplace.
Our success depends upon the continued emergence and growth of markets for analysis of genetic variation and biological function.
We design our products primarily for applications in the life sciences, diagnostic, agricultural, and pharmaceutical industries. The usefulness of our technologies depends in part upon the availability of genetic data and its usefulness in identifying or treating disease. We are focusing on markets for analysis of genetic variation and biological function, namely sequencing, genotyping, and gene expression profiling. These markets are new and emerging, and they may not develop as quickly as we anticipate, or reach their full potential. Other methods of analysis of genetic variation and biological function may emerge and displace the methods we are developing. Also, researchers may not be able to successfully analyze raw genetic data or be able to convert raw genetic data into medically valuable information. For instance, demand for our microarray products may be adversely affected if researchers fail to find meaningful correlations between genetic variation, such as SNPs, and disease susceptibility through genome wide association studies. In addition, factors affecting research and development spending generally, such as changes in the regulatory environment affecting life sciences and pharmaceutical companies, and changes in government programs that provide funding to companies and research institutions, could harm our business. If useful genetic data is not available or if our target markets do not develop in a timely manner, demand for our products may grow at a slower rate than we expect, and we may not be able to sustain profitability.
Reduction or delay in research and development budgets and government funding may adversely affect our revenue.
A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from genomic research centers, academic institutions, government laboratories, and clinical research organizations, as well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, and consumer genomics companies, and their capital spending budgets can have a significant effect on the demand for our products and services. These budgets are based on a wide variety of factors, including the allocation of available resources to make purchases, funding from government sources, the spending priorities among various types of research equipment, and policies regarding capital expenditures during recessionary periods. Any decrease in capital spending or change in spending priorities of our customers could significantly reduce our revenue. Moreover, we have no control over the timing and amount of purchases by our customers, and, as a result, revenue from these sources may vary significantly due to factors that can be difficult to forecast. Any delay or reduction in purchases by our customers or our inability to forecast fluctuations in demand could harm our future operating results.
The timing and amount of revenues from customers that rely on government and academic research funding may vary significantly due to factors that can be difficult to forecast, and there remains significant uncertainty concerning government and academic research funding worldwide as governments in the United States and Europe, in particular, focus on reducing fiscal deficits while at the same time confronting uncertain economic growth. Funding for life science research has increased more slowly during the past several years compared to previous years and has declined in some countries. Government funding of research and development is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Other programs, such as defense, entitlement programs, or general efforts to reduce budget deficits could be viewed by governments as a higher priority. These budgetary pressures may result in reduced allocations to government agencies that fund research and development activities, such as the U.S. National Institute of Health, or NIH. Past proposals to reduce budget deficits have included reduced NIH and other research and development allocations. Any shift away from the funding of life sciences research and development or delays surrounding the approval of government budget proposals may cause our customers to delay or forego purchases of our products, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
14
Our acquisitions expose us to risks that could adversely affect our business, and we
may not achieve the anticipated benefits of acquisitions of businesses or
technologies.
As part of our strategy to develop and identify new products, services, and technologies, we have made, and may continue to make, acquisitions of technologies, products, or businesses. Acquisitions involve numerous risks and operational, financial, and managerial challenges, including the following, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations:
|
•
|
difficulties in integrating new operations, technologies, products, and personnel;
|
|
•
|
lack of synergies or the inability to realize expected synergies and cost-savings;
|
|
•
|
difficulties in managing geographically dispersed operations;
|
|
•
|
underperformance of any acquired technology, product, or business relative to our expectations and the price we paid;
|
|
•
|
negative near-term impacts on financial results after an acquisition, including acquisition-related earnings charges;
|
|
•
|
the potential loss of key employees, customers, and strategic partners of acquired companies;
|
|
•
|
claims by terminated employees and shareholders of acquired companies or other third parties related to the transaction;
|
|
•
|
the issuance of dilutive securities, assumption or incurrence of additional debt obligations or expenses, or use of substantial portions of our cash;
|
|
•
|
diversion of management’s attention and company resources from existing operations of the business;
|
|
•
|
inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, and policies;
|
|
•
|
the impairment of intangible assets as a result of technological advancements, or worse-than-expected performance of acquired companies; and
|
|
•
|
assumption of, or exposure to, unknown contingent liabilities or liabilities that are difficult to identify or accurately quantify.
|
In addition, the successful integration of acquired businesses requires significant efforts and expense across all operational areas, including sales and marketing, research and development, manufacturing, finance, legal, and information technologies. There can be no assurance that any of the acquisitions we make will be successful or will be, or will remain, profitable. Our failure to successfully address the above risks may prevent us from achieving the anticipated benefits from any acquisition in a reasonable time frame, or at all.
If the quality of our products does not meet our customers’ expectations, then our reputation could suffer and ultimately our
sales and operating earnings could be negatively
impacted.
In the course of conducting our business, we must adequately address quality issues associated with our products and services, including defects in our engineering, design, and manufacturing processes, as well as defects in third-party components included in our products. Because our instruments and consumables are highly complex, the occurrence of defects may increase as we continue to introduce new products and services and as we scale up manufacturing to meet increased demand for our products and services. Although we have established internal policies and procedures aligned to global quality standards to minimize risks that may arise from product quality issues, there can be no assurance that we will be able to eliminate or mitigate occurrences of these issues and associated liabilities. In addition, identifying the root cause of quality issues, particularly those affecting reagents and third-party components, may be difficult, which increases the time needed to address quality issues as they arise and increases the risk that similar problems could recur. Finding solutions to quality issues can be expensive, and we may incur significant costs or lost revenue in connection with, for example, shipment holds, product recalls, and warranty or other service obligations. In addition, quality issues can impair our relationships with new or existing customers and adversely affect our brand image, and our reputation as a producer of high quality products could suffer, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
15
Litigation, other proceedings, or third party claims of intellectual property
infringement could require us to spend significant time and money and could prevent
us from selling our products or services.
Our success depends in part on our non-infringement of the patents or proprietary rights of third parties. Third parties have asserted and may in the future assert that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization. As we enter new markets or introduce new products, we expect that competitors will likely claim that our products infringe their intellectual property rights as part of a business strategy to impede our successful competition. In addition, third parties may have obtained and may in the future obtain patents allowing them to claim that the use of our technologies infringes these patents. We could incur substantial costs and divert the attention of our management and technical personnel in defending ourselves against any of these claims. Any adverse ruling or perception of an adverse ruling in defending ourselves against these claims could have an adverse impact on our stock price, which may be disproportionate to the actual import of the ruling itself. Furthermore, parties making claims against us may be able to obtain injunctive or other relief, which effectively could block our ability to develop further, commercialize, or sell products or services, and could result in the award of substantial damages against us. In the event of a successful infringement claim against us, we may be required to pay damages and obtain one or more licenses from third parties, or be prohibited from selling certain products or services. In addition, we may be unable to obtain these licenses at a reasonable cost, if at all. We could therefore incur substantial costs related to royalty payments for licenses obtained from third parties, which could negatively affect our gross margins and earnings per share. In addition, we could encounter delays in product introductions while we attempt to develop alternative methods or products. Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain any of these licenses on favorable terms could prevent us from commercializing products, and the prohibition of sale of any of our products or services could adversely affect our ability to grow or maintain profitability.
We depend on third-party manufacturers and suppliers for some of our products, or components and materials
used in our products, and if shipments from these manufacturers or suppliers are
delayed or interrupted, or if the quality of the products, components, or materials supplied do
not meet our requirements, we may not be able to launch, manufacture, or ship our
products in a timely manner, or at all.
The complex nature of our products requires customized, precision-manufactured components and materials that currently are available from a limited number of sources, and, in the case of some components and materials, from only a single source. If deliveries from these vendors are delayed or interrupted for any reason, or if we are otherwise unable to secure a sufficient supply, we may not be able to obtain these components or materials on a timely basis or in sufficient quantities or qualities, or at all, in order to meet demand for our products. We may need to enter into contractual relationships with manufacturers for commercial-scale production of some of our products, or develop these capabilities internally, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to do this on a timely basis, in sufficient quantities, or on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, the lead time needed to establish a relationship with a new supplier can be lengthy, and we may experience delays in meeting demand in the event we must switch to a new supplier. The time and effort required to qualify a new supplier could result in additional costs, diversion of resources, or reduced manufacturing yields, any of which would negatively impact our operating results. Accordingly, we may not be able to establish or maintain reliable, high-volume manufacturing at commercially reasonable costs or at all. In addition, the manufacture or shipment of our products may be delayed or interrupted if the quality of the products, components, or materials supplied by our vendors does not meet our requirements. Current or future social and environmental regulations or critical issues, such as those relating to the sourcing of conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or the need to eliminate environmentally sensitive materials from our products, could restrict the supply of components and materials used in production or increase our costs. Any delay or interruption to our manufacturing process or in shipping our products could result in lost revenue, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
If we are unable to increase our manufacturing capacity and develop and maintain
operation of our manufacturing capability, we may not be able to launch or support
our products in a timely manner, or at all.
We continue to rapidly increase our manufacturing capacity to meet the anticipated demand for our products. Although we have significantly increased our manufacturing capacity and we believe we have plans in place sufficient to ensure we have adequate capacity to meet our current business plans, there are uncertainties inherent in expanding our manufacturing capabilities, and we may not be able to sufficiently increase our capacity in a timely manner. For example, manufacturing and product quality issues may arise as we increase production rates at our manufacturing facilities and launch new products. Also, we may not manufacture the right product mix to meet customer demand, especially as we introduce new products. As a result, we may experience difficulties in meeting customer, collaborator, and internal demand, in which case we could lose customers or be required to delay new product introductions, and demand for our products could decline. Additionally, in the past, we have experienced variations in manufacturing conditions and quality control issues that have temporarily reduced or suspended production of certain products. Due to the intricate nature of manufacturing complex instruments, consumables, and products
16
that contain DNA, we may encounter similar or previously unknown manufacturing difficulties in the future that could significantly reduce production yields, impact our ability to launch or sell these products (or to produce them economically), prevent us from achieving expected performance levels, or cause us to set prices that hinder wide adoption by customers.
Additionally, we currently manufacture in a limited number of locations. Our manufacturing facilities are located in San Diego and the San Francisco Bay Area in California; Madison, Wisconsin; and Singapore. These areas are subject to natural disasters such as earthquakes, wildfires, or floods. If a natural disaster were to damage one of our facilities significantly or if other events were to cause our operations to fail, we may be unable to manufacture our products, provide our services, or develop new products.
Also, many of our manufacturing processes are automated and are controlled by our custom-designed laboratory information management system (LIMS). Additionally, the decoding process in our array manufacturing requires significant network and storage infrastructure. If either our LIMS system or our networks or storage infrastructure were to fail for an extended period of time, it may adversely impact our ability to manufacture our products on a timely basis and could prevent us from achieving our expected shipments in any given period.
If we lose our key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional
personnel, we may be unable to achieve our goals.
We are highly dependent on our management and scientific personnel, including Jay Flatley, our Chief Executive Officer. The loss of their services could adversely impact our ability to achieve our business objectives. In addition, the continued growth of our business depends on our ability to hire additional qualified personnel with expertise in molecular biology, chemistry, biological information processing, sales, marketing, and technical support. We compete for qualified management and scientific personnel with other life science companies, universities, and research institutions, particularly those focusing on genomics. Competition for these individuals, particularly in the San Diego and San Francisco area, is intense, and the turnover rate can be high. Failure to attract and retain management and scientific personnel would prevent us from pursuing collaborations or developing our products or technologies. Additionally, integration of acquired companies and businesses can be disruptive, causing key employees of the acquired business to leave. Further, we use share-based compensation, including restricted stock units and performance stock units to attract key personnel, incentivize them to remain with us, and align their interests with those of the Company by building long-term stockholder value. If our stock price decreases, the value of these equity awards decreases and therefore reduces a key employee’s incentive to stay.
Any inability to effectively protect our proprietary technologies could harm our
competitive position.
Our success depends to a large extent on our ability to develop proprietary products and technologies and to obtain patents and maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property in the United States and other countries. If we do not protect our intellectual property adequately, competitors may be able to use our technologies and thereby erode our competitive advantage. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, and many companies have encountered significant challenges in establishing and enforcing their proprietary rights outside of the United States. These challenges can be caused by the absence of rules and methods for the establishment and enforcement of intellectual property rights outside of the United States.
The proprietary positions of companies developing tools for the life sciences, genomics, agricultural, and pharmaceutical industries, including our proprietary position, generally are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. We will be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our proprietary technologies are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. We intend to apply for patents covering our technologies and products as we deem appropriate. However, our patent applications may be challenged and may not result in issued patents or may be invalidated or narrowed in scope after they are issued. Questions as to inventorship or ownership may also arise. Any finding that our patents or applications are unenforceable could harm our ability to prevent others from practicing the related technology, and a finding that others have inventorship or ownership rights to our patents and applications could require us to obtain certain rights to practice related technologies, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all. Furthermore, as issued patents expire, we may lose some competitive advantage as others develop competing products, and, as a result, we may lose revenue.
In addition, our existing patents and any future patents we obtain may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our technologies or from developing competing products and may therefore fail to provide us with any competitive advantage. We may need to initiate lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, or litigate against third party claims, which would be expensive, and, if we lose, may cause us to lose some of our intellectual property rights and reduce our ability to compete in the marketplace. Furthermore, these lawsuits may divert the attention of our management and technical personnel.
17
There is also the risk that others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or design around our patented technologies. In that regard, certain patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents issue, and publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature tend to lag behind actual discoveries by several months.
We also rely upon trade secrets and proprietary know-how protection for our confidential and proprietary information, and we have taken security measures to protect this information. These measures, however, may not provide adequate protection for our trade secrets, know-how, or other confidential information. Among other things, we seek to protect our trade secrets and confidential information by entering into confidentiality agreements with employees, collaborators, and consultants. There can be no assurance that any confidentiality agreements that we have with our employees, collaborators, and consultants will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets and confidential information or will provide adequate remedies in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of such information. Accordingly, there also can be no assurance that our trade secrets will not otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors.
Our products, if used for the diagnosis of disease, could be subject to government
regulation, and the regulatory approval and maintenance process for such products may
be expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain both in timing and in outcome.
Products are not subject to FDA clearance or approval if they are not intended to be used for the diagnosis of disease. However, as we expand our product line to encompass products that are intended to be used for the diagnosis of disease, such as our FDA-cleared MiSeqDx, certain of our products will become subject to regulation by the FDA, or comparable international agencies, including requirements for regulatory clearance or approval of such products before they can be marketed. Such regulatory approval processes or clearances may be expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain, and our failure to obtain or comply with such approvals and clearances could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or operating results. In addition, changes to the current regulatory framework, including the imposition of additional or new regulations, could arise at any time during the development or marketing of our products, which may negatively affect our ability to obtain or maintain FDA or comparable regulatory approval of our products, if required.
Molecular diagnostic products, in particular, depending on their intended use, may be regulated as medical devices by the FDA and comparable international agencies and may require either receiving clearance from the FDA following a pre-market notification process or premarket approval from the FDA, in each case prior to marketing. Obtaining the requisite regulatory approvals can be expensive and may involve considerable delay. If we fail to obtain, or experience significant delays in obtaining, regulatory approvals for molecular diagnostic products that we develop, we may not be able to launch or successfully commercialize such products in a timely manner, or at all.
In addition, if our products labeled as “Research Use Only,” or RUO, are used, or could be used, for the diagnosis of disease, the regulatory requirements related to marketing, selling, and supporting such products could be uncertain, even if such use by our customers is without our consent. If the FDA or other regulatory authorities assert that any of our RUO products are subject to regulatory clearance or approval, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be adversely affected.
If product or service liability lawsuits are successfully brought against us, we may face reduced demand for our products and incur significant liabilities.
We face an inherent risk of exposure to product or service liability claims if our technologies or products are alleged to have caused harm or do not perform in accordance with specifications, in part because our products are used for sensitive applications. We cannot be certain that we would be able to successfully defend any product or service liability lawsuit brought against us. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product or service liability claims may result in:
|
•
|
decreased demand for our products;
|
|
•
|
injury to our reputation;
|
|
•
|
increased product liability insurance costs;
|
|
•
|
costs of related litigation; and
|
|
•
|
substantial monetary awards to plaintiffs.
|
Although we carry product and service liability insurance, if we become the subject of a successful product or service liability lawsuit, our insurance may not cover all substantial liabilities, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
18
As we develop, market, or sell diagnostic tests, we may encounter delays in receipt, or limits in the amount, of reimbursement approvals and public health funding, which will impact our ability to grow revenues in the healthcare market.
Physicians and patients may not order diagnostic tests that we develop, market, or sell, such as our verifi prenatal test, unless third-party payors, such as managed care organizations as well as government payors such as Medicare and Medicaid and governmental payors outside of the United States, pay a substantial portion of the test price. Third-party payors are often reluctant to reimburse healthcare providers for the use of medical tests that involve new technologies or provide novel diagnostic information. In addition, third-party payors are increasingly limiting reimbursement coverage for medical diagnostic products and, in many instances, are exerting pressure on diagnostic product suppliers to reduce their prices. Reimbursement by a payor may depend on a number of factors, including a payor's determination that tests using our technologies are:
|
•
|
not experimental or investigational,
|
|
•
|
medically necessary,
|
|
•
|
appropriate for the specific patient,
|
|
•
|
cost-effective,
|
|
•
|
supported by peer-reviewed publications, and
|
|
•
|
included in clinical practice guidelines
|
Since each third-party payor often makes reimbursement decisions on an individual patient basis, obtaining such approvals is a time-consuming and costly process that requires us to provide scientific and clinical data supporting the clinical benefits of each of our products. As a result, there can be no assurance that reimbursement approvals will be obtained. This process can delay the broad market introduction of new products, and could have a negative effect on our results of operations. As a result, third-party reimbursement may not be consistent or financially adequate to cover the cost of diagnostic products that we develop, market, or sell. This could limit our ability to sell our products or cause us to reduce prices, which would adversely affect our results of operations.
Even if we are being reimbursed for our tests, third party payors may withdraw their coverage policies, cancel their contracts with us at any time, review and adjust the rate of reimbursement, require co-payments from patients, or stop paying for our tests, which would reduce our revenues. In addition, insurers, including managed care organizations as well as government payors such as Medicare and Medicaid, have increased their efforts to control the cost, utilization, and delivery of healthcare services. These measures have resulted in reduced payment rates and decreased utilization for the clinical laboratory industry. Reductions in the reimbursement rate of payors may occur in the future. Reductions in the prices at which our tests are reimbursed could have a negative impact on our results of operations.
Billing complexities associated with obtaining payment or reimbursement for our diagnostic tests may negatively affect our revenues, cash flow, and profitability, and we may incur additional financial risk related to collections and reimbursement in connection with the commercialization of our diagnostic tests.
Billing for clinical laboratory testing services is complex, and we have limited experience in billing and pursuing reimbursement and payment for diagnostic tests. As a result of this lack of experience and uncertainty with respect to reimbursement, we may also face an increased risk in our collection efforts, including potential write-offs of doubtful accounts and long collection cycles for accounts receivable related to our testing service, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Among the factors complicating our billing of third-party payors are:
|
•
|
disputes among payors as to which party is responsible for payment;
|
|
•
|
disparity in coverage among various payors;
|
|
•
|
disparity in information and billing requirements among payors; and
|
|
•
|
incorrect or missing billing information, which is required to be provided by the prescribing physician.
|
These billing complexities, and the related uncertainty in obtaining payment for our tests, could negatively affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
19
Doing business internationally creates operational and financial risks for our
business.
Conducting and launching operations on an international scale requires close coordination of activities across multiple jurisdictions and time zones and consumes significant management resources. If we fail to coordinate and manage these activities effectively, including the risks noted below, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be adversely affected. We are focused on expanding our international operations in key markets. We have sales offices located internationally throughout Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, and Brazil, as well as manufacturing facilities in Singapore. During
2013
, a significant portion of our sales to international customers were denominated in foreign currencies while the majority of our purchases of raw materials from international suppliers were denominated in U.S. dollars. Shipments to customers outside the United States comprised
50%
,
51%
, and
50%
of our total revenue for fiscal years
2013
,
2012
, and
2011
, respectively. We intend to continue to expand our international presence by selling to customers located outside of the United States and we expect the total amount of non-U.S. sales to continue to grow.
International sales entail a variety of risks, including:
|
•
|
longer payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable outside of the United States;
|
|
•
|
longer sales cycles due to the volume of transactions taking place through public tenders;
|
|
•
|
currency exchange fluctuations;
|
|
•
|
challenges in staffing and managing foreign operations;
|
|
•
|
tariffs and other trade barriers;
|
|
•
|
unexpected changes in legislative or regulatory requirements of foreign countries into which we sell our products;
|
|
•
|
difficulties in obtaining export licenses or in overcoming other trade barriers and restrictions resulting in delivery delays; and
|
|
•
|
significant taxes or other burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws.
|
Changes in the value of the relevant currencies may affect the cost of certain items required in our operations. Changes in currency exchange rates may also affect the relative prices at which we are able sell products in the same market. Our revenues from international customers may be negatively impacted as increases in the U.S. dollar relative to our international customers local currency could make our products more expensive, impacting our ability to compete. Our costs of materials from international suppliers may increase if in order to continue doing business with us they raise their prices as the value of the U.S. dollar decreases relative to their local currency. Foreign policies and actions regarding currency valuation could result in actions by the United States and other countries to offset the effects of such fluctuations. The recent global financial downturn has led to a high level of volatility in foreign currency exchange rates and that level of volatility may continue, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
We are subject to risks related to taxation in multiple jurisdictions.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgments based on interpretations of existing tax laws or regulations are required in determining the provision for income taxes. Our effective income tax rate could be adversely affected by various factors, including, but not limited to, changes in the mix of earnings in tax jurisdictions with different statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in existing tax laws or tax rates, changes in the level of non-deductible expenses (including share-based compensation), changes in our future levels of research and development spending, mergers and acquisitions, or the result of examinations by various tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, if the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or other taxing authority disagrees with the positions taken by the Company on its tax returns, we could have additional tax liability, including interest and penalties. If material, payment of such additional amounts upon final adjudication of any disputes could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.
An inability to manage our growth or the expansion of our operations could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our business has grown rapidly, with total revenues increasing from
$73.5 million
for the year ended January 1, 2006 to
$1.42 billion
for the year ended
December 29, 2013
, and with the number of employees increasing from 375 to
more than 3,000
during the same period. We expect to continue to experience substantial growth in order to achieve our operating plans. The continued global expansion of our business and addition of new personnel may place a strain on our management and operational systems. Our ability to effectively manage our operations and growth requires us to continue to expend funds to
20
enhance our operational, financial, and management controls, reporting systems, and procedures and to attract and retain sufficient numbers of talented employees on a global basis. If we are unable to scale up and implement improvements to our manufacturing process and control systems in an efficient or timely manner, or if we encounter deficiencies in existing systems and controls, then we will not be able to make available the products required to successfully commercialize our technology. Our future operating results will depend on the ability of our management to continue to implement and improve our research, product development, manufacturing, sales and marketing, and customer support programs, enhance our operational and financial control systems, expand, train, and manage our employee base, integrate acquired businesses, and effectively address new issues related to our growth as they arise. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage our recent or any future expansion or acquisition successfully, and any inability to do so could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our operating results may vary significantly from period to period, and we may not be
able to sustain operating profitability.
Our revenue is subject to fluctuations due to the timing of sales of high-value products and services, the effects of new product launches and related promotions, the timing and availability of our customers’ funding, the impact of seasonal spending patterns, the timing and size of research projects our customers perform, changes in overall spending levels in the life sciences industry, and other unpredictable factors that may affect customer ordering patterns. Given the difficulty in predicting the timing and magnitude of sales for our products and services, we may experience quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in revenue resulting in the potential for a sequential decline in quarterly revenue. While we anticipate future growth, there is some uncertainty as to the timing of revenue recognition on a quarterly basis. This is because a substantial portion of our quarterly revenue is typically recognized in the last month of a quarter and because the pattern for revenue generation during that month is normally not linear, with a concentration of orders in the final weeks of the quarter. In light of that, our revenue cut-off and recognition procedures, together with our manufacturing and shipping operations, may experience increased pressure and demand during the time period shortly before the end of a fiscal quarter.
A large portion of our expenses are relatively fixed, including expenses for facilities, equipment, and personnel. In addition, we expect operating expenses to continue to increase significantly in absolute dollars, and we expect that our research and development and selling and marketing expenses will increase at a higher rate in the future as a result of the development and launch of new products. Accordingly, our ability to sustain profitability will depend in part on the rate of growth, if any, of our revenue and on the level of our expenses, and if revenue does not grow as anticipated, we may not be able to maintain annual or quarterly profitability. Any significant delays in the commercial launch of our products, unfavorable sales trends in our existing product lines, or impacts from the other factors mentioned above, could adversely affect our future revenue growth or cause a sequential decline in quarterly revenue. In addition, non-cash share-based compensation expense and expenses related to prior and future acquisitions are also likely to continue to adversely affect our future profitability. Due to the possibility of significant fluctuations in our revenue and expenses, particularly from quarter to quarter, we believe that quarterly comparisons of our operating results are not a good indication of our future performance. If our operating results fluctuate or do not meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors, our stock price could decline.
From time to time, we receive large orders that have a significant effect on our operating results in the period in which the order is recognized as revenue. The timing of such orders is difficult to predict, and the timing of revenue recognition from such orders may affect period to period changes in net sales. As a result, our operating results could vary materially from quarter to quarter based on the receipt of such orders and their ultimate recognition as revenue.
Changes in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates, and judgments
by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our
financial results or financial condition.
Generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines, and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business, such as revenue recognition, asset impairment and fair value determinations, inventories, business combinations and intangible asset valuations, and litigation, are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates, and judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates, or judgments could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance or financial condition.
Ethical, legal, and social concerns related to the use of genetic information could
reduce demand for our products or services.
Our products may be used to provide genetic information about humans, agricultural crops, and other living organisms. The information obtained from our products could be used in a variety of applications, which may have underlying ethical,
21
legal, and social concerns regarding privacy and the appropriate uses of the resulting information, including preimplantation genetic screening of embryos, prenatal genetic testing, genetic engineering or modification of agricultural products, or testing genetic predisposition for certain medical conditions, particularly for those that have no known cure. Governmental authorities could, for social or other purposes, call for limits on or regulation of the use of genetic testing or prohibit testing for genetic predisposition to certain conditions, particularly for those that have no known cure. Similarly, such concerns may lead individuals to refuse to use genetics tests even if permissible. These and other ethical, legal, and social concerns about genetic testing may limit market acceptance of our technology for certain applications or reduce the potential markets for our technology, either of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our strategic investments may result in losses.
We periodically make strategic investments in various public and private companies with businesses or technologies that may complement our business. The market values of these strategic investments may fluctuate due to market conditions and other conditions over which we have no control. Other-than-temporary declines in the market price and valuations of the securities that we hold in other companies would require us to record losses related to our investment. This could result in future charges to our earnings. It is uncertain whether or not we will realize any long-term benefits associated with these strategic investments.
Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information, and that of our customers, and personally identifiable information of our customers and employees, in our data centers and on our networks. The secure maintenance of this information is important to our operations and business strategy. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance, or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost, or stolen. Any such access, disclosure, or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, and damage to our reputation.
Unforeseen problems with the implementation and maintenance of our information systems could have an adverse effect on our operations.
As a part of our ongoing effort to upgrade our current information systems, we are implementing new enterprise resource planning software and other software applications to manage certain of our business operations. As we implement and add functionality, problems could arise that we have not foreseen. Such problems could adversely impact our ability to provide quotes, take customer orders, and otherwise run our business in a timely manner. In addition, if our new systems fail to provide accurate and increased visibility into pricing and cost structures, it may be difficult to improve or maximize our profit margins. As a result, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
We also rely on our technology infrastructure, among other functions, to interact with suppliers; sell our products and services; fulfill orders; bill, collect, and make payments; ship products; provide services and support to customers; track customers; fulfill contractual obligations; and otherwise conduct business. Our systems may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural disasters, power loss, telecommunication failures, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, computer denial-of-service attacks, unauthorized access to customer or employee data or company trade secrets, and other attempts to harm our systems. When we upgrade or change systems, we may suffer interruptions in service, loss of data, or reduced functionality. Certain of our systems are not redundant, and our disaster recovery planning is not sufficient for every eventuality. Despite any precautions we may take, such problems could result in, among other consequences, interruptions in our services, which could harm our reputation and financial results.
Conversion of our outstanding convertible notes may result in losses.
As of
December 29, 2013
, we had
$920 million
aggregate principal amount of convertible notes due 2016 outstanding. The notes are convertible into cash, and if applicable, shares of our common stock under certain circumstances, including trading price conditions related to our common stock. If the trading price of our common stock remains significantly above the conversion price of
$83.55
with respect to convertible notes due 2016, we expect that the noteholders will elect to convert the applicable notes. Upon conversion, we are required to record a gain or loss for the difference between the fair value of the notes to be extinguished and their corresponding net carrying value. The fair value of the notes to be extinguished depends on our current incremental borrowing rate. The net carrying value of our notes has an implicit interest rate of
4.5%
with respect to
22
convertible notes due 2016. If our incremental borrowing rate at the time of conversion is lower than the implied interest rate of the notes, we will record a loss in our consolidated statement of income during the period in which the notes are converted.
Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws include anti-takeover provisions that may make it difficult for another company to acquire control of us or limit the price investors might be willing to pay for our stock.
Certain provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws could delay the removal of incumbent directors and could make it more difficult to successfully complete a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest involving us. Our Certificate of Incorporation has provisions that give our Board the ability to issue preferred stock and determine the rights and designations of the preferred stock at any time without stockholder approval. The rights of the holders of our common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of our outstanding voting stock. In addition, the staggered terms of our board of directors could have the effect of delaying or deferring a change in control.
In addition, certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), including Section 203 of the DGCL, may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in the control or management of Illumina. Section 203 of the DGCL provides, with certain exceptions, for waiting periods applicable to business combinations with stockholders owning at least 15% and less than 85% of the voting stock (exclusive of stock held by directors, officers, and employee plans) of a company.
The above factors may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or otherwise delaying or preventing changes in the control or management of Illumina, including transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium over the fair market value of our common stock.
|
ITEM 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments.
|
None.
|
ITEM 2.
|
Properties.
|
The following chart summarizes the facilities we lease as of
December 29, 2013
, including the location and size of each principal facility, and their designated use. We believe our facilities are adequate for our current and near-term needs, and that we will be able to locate additional facilities as needed.
|
Approximate
|
Lease
|
||||||
|
Location
|
Square Feet
|
Operation
|
Expiration Dates
|
||||
|
San Diego, CA
|
557,000
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing, Warehouse, Distribution, and Administrative
|
2015 – 2031
|
|||
|
San Francisco Bay Area, CA*
|
161,000
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing, and Administrative
|
2014 – 2018
|
|||
|
Singapore
|
104,000
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing, and Administrative
|
2015 – 2016
|
|||
|
Cambridge, United Kingdom
|
66,000
|
|
R&D and Administrative
|
2021 - 2024
|
|||
|
Eindhoven, the Netherlands
|
42,000
|
|
Distribution and Administrative
|
2015
|
|||
|
Madison, WI
|
27,000
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing, and Administrative
|
2018
|
|||
|
Morrisville, NC
|
23,000
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing
|
2016
|
|||
|
Other
|
30,000
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing, and Administrative
|
2014 - 2016
|
|||
_____________________
*Excludes approximately 98,000 square feet in San Francisco, California, as the lease does not commence until 2014.
23
|
ITEM 3.
|
Legal Proceedings.
|
We are involved in various lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to intellectual property, employment, and contractual matters. In connection with these matters, we assess, on a regular basis, the probability and range of possible loss based on the developments in these matters. A liability is recorded in the financial statements if it is believed to be probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable and unfavorable results could occur, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. We regularly review outstanding legal matters to determine the adequacy of the liabilities accrued and related disclosures. The amount of ultimate loss may differ from these estimates. Each matter presents its own unique circumstances, and prior litigation does not necessarily provide a reliable basis on which to predict the outcome, or range of outcomes, in any individual proceeding. Because of the uncertainties related to the occurrence, amount, and range of loss on any pending litigation or claim, we are currently unable to predict their ultimate outcome, and, with respect to any pending litigation or claim where no liability has been accrued, to make a meaningful estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome. In the event that opposing litigants in outstanding litigations or claims ultimately succeed at trial and any subsequent appeals on their claims, any potential loss or charges in excess of any established accruals, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows in the period in which the unfavorable outcome occurs or becomes probable, and potentially in future periods.
On November 24, 2010, Syntrix Biosystems, Inc. filed suit against us in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Tacoma (Case No. C10-5870-BHS) alleging that we willfully infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,951,682 by selling our BeadChip array products, and that we misappropriated Syntrix’s trade secrets. In November and December 2012, we filed motions for summary judgment that the patent is not infringed and is invalid, and that Syntrix’s trade secrets claims are barred by various statutes of limitation. Syntrix filed a motion for summary judgment that the patent is valid. On January 30, 2013, the Court granted our motion for summary judgment on Syntrix’s trade secret claims, and dismissed those claims from the case. The Court denied Syntrix’s motion for summary judgment on validity, and denied our motion for summary judgment for non-infringement and invalidity. On March 14, 2013, a jury reached a verdict in favor of Syntrix, finding that Illumina’s BeadChip kits infringe the Syntrix patent. During trial, the court dismissed Syntrix’s claim that the alleged infringement was willful. On July 1, 2013, the Court entered a Final Amended Judgment for $115.1 million, in accordance with the jury verdict, including supplemental damages and prejudgment interest. In addition, the court awarded Syntrix an ongoing royalty of 8% for accused sales from March 15, 2013, until the patent expires on September 16, 2019. On July 17, 2013, we filed a post-trial motion asking the District Court to vacate the amended judgment and enter judgment as a matter of law in our favor or, alternatively, to grant a new trial. On November 4, 2013, the Court issued an Order denying our motion for judgment as a matter of law and upholding the jury verdict.
We believe strongly that we did not infringe the Syntrix patent and that the patent is invalid. Therefore, we disagree with the judgment and contend that the judgment is not supported by the law or facts. Accordingly, on December 3, 2013, we filed a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit challenging the Final Amended Judgment.
As a result of the amended judgment, we have recorded a legal contingency accrual of
$132.9 million
as of
December 29, 2013
, which includes the damages and prejudgment interest awarded to Syntrix, estimated additional damages through
December 29, 2013
, and an estimate of interest accrued on the damages subsequent to June 19, 2013. For the year ended
December 29, 2013
, such charges totaled
$132.9 million
,
$114.6 million
of which was recorded within operating expenses, and the remainder was recorded to cost of sales. In December 2013, we secured the amount of the judgment by executing a supersedeas bond and deposited
$12.0 million
of the accrued post-judgment ongoing royalty amounts with the Court. We will continue to deposit with the Court ongoing royalties on future sales at the royalty rate stated in the Final Amended Judgment during the appeal process. Funds deposited with the Court are reported as restricted cash in other long-term assets.
|
ITEM 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures.
|
Not applicable.
24
|
ITEM 5.
|
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Market Information
Our common stock has been quoted on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ILMN” since July 28, 2000. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, the quarterly high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market.
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$
|
56.58
|
|
$
|
48.00
|
|
$
|
55.39
|
|
$
|
28.72
|
|
|||
|
Second Quarter
|
$
|
77.11
|
|
$
|
53.77
|
|
$
|
53.00
|
|
$
|
37.77
|
|
|||
|
Third Quarter
|
$
|
85.81
|
|
$
|
72.13
|
|
$
|
49.27
|
|
$
|
38.92
|
|
|||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$
|
110.54
|
|
$
|
72.77
|
|
$
|
57.00
|
|
$
|
44.78
|
|
|||
Stock Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder returns on our common stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total stockholder returns on the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index for the same period. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 28, 2008 in our common stock and in each index and that all dividends were reinvested. No cash dividends have been declared on our common stock. Stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns.
Compare 5-Year Cumulative Total Return Among Illumina, NASDAQ Composite Index,
and NASDAQ Biotechnology Index
25
Holders
As of
January 31, 2014
, we had
228
record holders of our common stock.
Dividends
We have never paid cash dividends and have no present intention to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The indenture for our
0.25%
convertible senior notes due 2016, which notes are convertible into cash and, in certain circumstances, shares of our common stock, requires us to increase the conversion rate applicable to the notes if we pay any cash dividends.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
None during the fiscal quarter ended
December 29, 2013
.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
None during the fiscal quarter ended
December 29, 2013
.
|
ITEM 6.
|
Selected Financial Data.
|
The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial data for each of our last five fiscal years during the period ended
December 29, 2013
.
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013
(52 weeks)
|
December 30,
2012
(52 weeks)
|
January 1,
2012
(52 weeks) |
January 2,
2011
(52 weeks) |
January 3,
2010
(53 weeks) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
1,421,178
|
|
$
|
1,148,516
|
|
$
|
1,055,535
|
|
$
|
902,741
|
|
$
|
666,324
|
|
||||
|
Income from operations
|
$
|
134,107
|
|
$
|
200,752
|
|
$
|
199,461
|
|
$
|
211,654
|
|
$
|
125,597
|
|
||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
125,308
|
|
$
|
151,254
|
|
$
|
86,628
|
|
$
|
124,891
|
|
$
|
72,281
|
|
||||
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
||||
|
Shares used in calculating net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Basic
|
125,076
|
|
122,999
|
|
123,399
|
|
123,581
|
|
123,154
|
|
|||||||||
|
Diluted
|
139,936
|
|
133,693
|
|
138,937
|
|
143,433
|
|
137,096
|
|
|||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
January 2,
2011 |
January 3,
2010 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments(1),(2)
|
$
|
1,165,603
|
|
$
|
1,350,204
|
|
$
|
1,189,568
|
|
$
|
894,289
|
|
$
|
693,527
|
|
||||
|
Working capital
|
$
|
1,295,472
|
|
$
|
1,482,477
|
|
$
|
1,317,698
|
|
$
|
723,881
|
|
$
|
540,354
|
|
||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,019,006
|
|
$
|
2,566,085
|
|
$
|
2,195,840
|
|
$
|
1,839,113
|
|
$
|
1,429,937
|
|
||||
|
Long-term debt, current portion(1)
|
$
|
29,288
|
|
$
|
36,967
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
311,609
|
|
$
|
290,202
|
|
|||||
|
Long-term debt, less current portion(1)
|
$
|
839,305
|
|
$
|
805,406
|
|
$
|
807,369
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity(2)
|
$
|
1,533,202
|
|
$
|
1,318,581
|
|
$
|
1,075,215
|
|
$
|
1,197,675
|
|
$
|
864,248
|
|
||||
26
In addition to the following notes, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further information regarding our consolidated results of operations and financial position for periods reported therein and for known factors that will impact comparability of future results.
_______________________________________
|
(1)
|
During 2011, we issued
$920.0 million
principal amount of
0.25%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2016, which was classified as long-term liability as of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
. In February 2007, we issued
$400.0 million
principal amount of
0.625%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2014. Due to the
0.625%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 being convertible during the fiscal years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
,
January 2, 2011
, and
January 3, 2010
, we classified the outstanding principal amount of these notes as current in our consolidated balance sheet in the respective periods. As of
January 1, 2012
, the outstanding principal amount of the
0.625%
Convertible Senior Notes was not convertible and was therefore reclassified to long-term liability. See note “6. Convertible Senior Notes” in Part II, Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for further information.
|
|
(2)
|
For the fiscal years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
,
January 1, 2012
,
January 2, 2011
, and
January 3, 2010
, we repurchased
0.9 million
,
1.9 million
,
9.2 million
,
0.8 million
, and
6.1 million
shares, respectively, of common stock for
$50.0 million
,
$82.5 million
,
$570.3 million
,
$44.0 million
, and
$175.1 million
, respectively. See note “9. Stockholders’ Equity” in Part II, Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. This MD&A is organized as follows:
|
•
|
Business Overview and Outlook
. High level discussion of our operating results and significant known trends that affect our business.
|
|
•
|
Results of Operations
. Detailed discussion of our revenues and expenses.
|
|
•
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
. Discussion of key aspects of our statements of cash flows, changes in our financial position, and our financial commitments.
|
|
•
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
. We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements.
|
|
•
|
Contractual Obligations.
Tabular disclosure of known contractual obligations as of
December 29, 2013
.
|
|
•
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
. Discussion of significant changes since our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments underlying our financial statements.
|
This MD&A discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for additional factors relating to such statements, and see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report for a discussion of certain risk factors applicable to our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods.
Business Overview and Outlook
This overview and outlook provides a high level discussion of our operating results and significant known trends that affect our business. We believe that an understanding of these trends is important to understanding our financial results for the periods being reported herein as well as our future financial performance. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive, nor is it intended to be a substitute for the detailed discussion and analysis provided elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
About Illumina
We are a leading developer, manufacturer, and marketer of life science tools and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variation and function. Using our proprietary technologies, we provide innovative sequencing- and array-based solutions for genotyping, copy-number variation (CNV) analysis, methylation studies, and gene expression profiling of DNA and RNA. Our customers include leading genomic research centers, academic institutions, government laboratories, hospitals, and reference laboratories, as well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, commercial molecular diagnostic, and consumer genomics companies.
27
Our portfolio of instruments, consumables, and analysis tools are designed to simplify and accelerate genetic analysis. This portfolio addresses a broad range of genomic complexity, throughput, and price points, enabling customers to select the best solution for their scientific challenge. These systems can be used to efficiently perform a range of nucleic acid (DNA, RNA) analyses on large numbers of samples. For more focused studies, our array-based solutions provide ideal tools to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) involving single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and CNV analyses, as well as gene expression profiling and other DNA and RNA studies.
To provide our customers with more comprehensive sample-to-answer workflow solutions, we acquired: NextBio, a leader in clinical and genomic informatics, in November 2013; Advanced Liquid Logic Inc., a leader in digital microfluidics and liquid handling solutions, in July 2013; and Epicentre Technologies Corporation, a leading provider of nucleic acid sample preparation reagents and specialty enzymes for sequencing and microarray applications, in 2011.
During the last two years, we have taken significant steps to support our goal of becoming a leader in the reproductive health market by acquiring Verinata Health, Inc. (Verinata) in February 2013 and BlueGnome Ltd. (BlueGnome) in 2012. Our acquisition of Verinata further strengthened our focus on reproductive health by adding to our product portfolio Verinata’s verifi® prenatal test, a comprehensive non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) for high-risk pregnancies, and what we believe to be the most comprehensive intellectual property portfolio in the NIPT industry. Our acquisition of BlueGnome, a leading provider of genetic solutions for the screening of chromosomal abnormalities associated with developmental delay, cancer, and infertility, expanded our ability to establish integrated solutions in reproductive health and cancer.
Our financial results have been, and will continue to be, impacted by several significant trends, which are described below. While these trends are important to understanding and evaluating our financial results, this discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in Item 1, Part I of this report, and the other transactions, events, and trends discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, Part I of this report.
Funding Environment
While many of our customers receive funding from government agencies to purchase our products or services, we are diversifying our customer base to include more customers that do not depend on government funding. In
2013
, approximately 45% of our total revenue came from customers who are not directly reliant on government agencies for funding. We estimate that less than 30% of our total revenue in
2013
came from academic or government customers in the United States that, directly or indirectly, derive funding from the U.S. National Institute of Health (NIH). NIH funding for the U.S. fiscal year 2014 is set to increase more than 3% compared to the 2013 sequestration budget, and we believe that allocations within the NIH budget will continue to favor genetic analysis tools generally and, in particular, research programs that utilize next-generation sequencing.
Next-Generation Sequencing
Next-generation sequencing has become a core technology for modern life science research and is increasingly being used in the applied, molecular diagnostics, and translational markets. Our sequencing instrument installed base continued to expand in 2013, and we believe that expansion of the sequencing market, including an increase in the number of samples available and enhancements in our product portfolio, will continue to drive demand for our next-generation sequencing technologies. As a result, we believe that our sequencing consumable revenue will continue to grow in future periods.
Our portfolio of sequencing platforms represents a family of systems that are designed to meet the workflow, output, and accuracy demands of a full range of sequencing applications. Our MiSeq sequencing system is a low-cost desktop sequencing system that provides individual researchers with rapid turnaround time, high accuracy, and streamlined workflow. NextSeq 500, launched in January 2014, provides flexibility from whole genome sequencing to targeted panels in a desktop platform. Our HiSeq 2500 sequencing system allows customers to sequence an entire human genome in approximately a day. HiSeq X Ten, announced in January 2014, is a set of ten ultra-high-throughput sequencers built for large-scale human whole-genome sequencing with the ability to generate 1.8 terabases of DNA sequence per sequencer in less than three days.
MicroArrays
As a complement to next-generation sequencing, we believe microarrays offer a less expensive, faster, and highly accurate technology for use when genetic content is already known. The information content of microarrays is fixed and reproducible. As such, microarrays provide repeatable, standardized assays for certain subsets of nucleotide bases within the overall genome. We believe that life science researchers will migrate certain array studies to sequencing; however, we expect this decline to be offset by demand from customers in consumer, reproductive health, and applied markets. Additionally,
28
demand in the array market has trended toward microarrays that have large-sample numbers at a lower complexity, thus having a lower selling price per sample, and we believe our innovation in microarray products supports the lower selling price.
Financial Overview
Financial highlights for
2013
include the following:
|
•
|
Net revenue
increased
by
24%
in
2013
compared to
2012
. Our sales increased across our portfolio of sequencing products, including consumables, instruments, and services.
|
|
•
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue (gross margin) was
64.2%
in
2013
,
a decrease
from
67.4%
in
2012
. Gross margin decreased in
2013
due in large part to an impairment charge associated with the discontinuation of the Eco and NuPCR product lines, higher amortization of acquired intangible assets, and legal contingencies associated with the Syntrix litigation matter. See note “10. Legal Proceedings” in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. We believe our gross margin in future periods will depend on several factors, including: market conditions that may impact our pricing power; sales mix changes among consumable, instrument, and services; product mix changes between established products and new products in new markets; our cost structure for manufacturing operations; royalties; and our ability to create innovative and high premium products that meet or stimulate customer demand.
|
|
•
|
Income from operations
decreased
by
$66.6 million
in
2013
compared to
2012
. This was a result of higher operating expenses offsetting the increase in gross profit. During the current period, we recorded a
$115.4 million
legal contingency expense in operating expenses associated primarily with the Syntrix patent litigation matter. Additionally, our research and development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses increased from the prior year by
$45.7 million
and
$95.0 million
, respectively, and we expect such expenses to continue to grow as we continue to invest in the growth of our business.
|
|
•
|
Our effective tax rate was
21.3%
in
2013
, as compared to
32.1%
in
2012
. The variance from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% in 2013 was primarily attributable to a higher mix of foreign earnings taxed at rates lower than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and the retroactive reinstatement of the federal research and development credit for 2012 which was enacted in January 2013. These items offset the impact of recording a valuation allowance which was primarily related to the estimated limitation on utilizing foreign tax credits in the U.S. Our future effective tax rate may vary from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate due to the mix of earnings in tax jurisdictions with different statutory tax rates and the other factors discussed in the risk factor “We are subject to risks related to taxation in multiple jurisdictions” in Part I Item 1A of this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 29, 2013
. We anticipate that our effective tax rate will trend lower than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate in the future due to the portion of our earnings that will be subject to lower statutory tax rates.
|
In 2013, the Internal Revenue Service began an audit of the corporate income tax return filed for fiscal year 2011. The Internal Revenue Service continues to gather information and has not yet proposed any adjustments to the filed return.
|
•
|
We ended
2013
with cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments totaling
$1.17 billion
.
|
29
Results of Operations
To enhance comparability, the following table sets forth audited consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
stated as a percentage of total revenue.
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Product revenue
|
89.0
|
%
|
91.9
|
%
|
93.5
|
%
|
||
|
Service and other revenue
|
11.0
|
|
8.1
|
|
6.5
|
|
||
|
Total revenue
|
100.0
|
|
100.0
|
|
100.0
|
|
||
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cost of product revenue
|
28.7
|
|
27.6
|
|
29.2
|
|
||
|
Cost of service and other revenue
|
4.8
|
|
3.8
|
|
2.5
|
|
||
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
2.3
|
|
1.2
|
|
1.1
|
|
||
|
Total cost of revenue
|
35.8
|
|
32.6
|
|
32.8
|
|
||
|
Gross profit
|
64.2
|
|
67.4
|
|
67.2
|
|
||
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Research and development
|
19.5
|
|
20.1
|
|
18.7
|
|
||
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
26.8
|
|
24.9
|
|
24.8
|
|
||
|
Legal contingencies
|
8.1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Unsolicited tender offer related expense
|
1.0
|
|
2.0
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
(0.8
|
)
|
0.2
|
|
0.1
|
|
||
|
Headquarter relocation
|
0.2
|
|
2.3
|
|
4.0
|
|
||
|
Restructuring
|
—
|
|
0.4
|
|
0.8
|
|
||
|
Total operating expense
|
54.8
|
|
49.9
|
|
48.4
|
|
||
|
Income from operations
|
9.4
|
|
17.5
|
|
18.8
|
|
||
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Interest income
|
0.3
|
|
1.4
|
|
0.7
|
|
||
|
Interest expense
|
(2.7
|
)
|
(3.3
|
)
|
(3.3
|
)
|
||
|
Cost-method investment related gain, net
|
4.3
|
|
4.0
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Other expense, net
|
(0.1
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
(3.7
|
)
|
||
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
1.8
|
|
1.9
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
||
|
Income before income taxes
|
11.2
|
|
19.4
|
|
12.5
|
|
||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
2.4
|
|
6.2
|
|
4.4
|
|
||
|
Net income
|
8.8
|
%
|
13.2
|
%
|
8.1
|
%
|
||
Our fiscal year is the 52 or 53 weeks ending the Sunday closest to December 31, with quarters of 13 or 14 weeks ending the Sunday closest to March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31. Each of the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
were 52 weeks.
Revenue
|
2013 - 2012
|
2012 - 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
Change
|
% Change
|
2011
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Product revenue
|
$
|
1,264,656
|
|
$
|
1,055,826
|
|
$
|
208,830
|
|
20
|
%
|
$
|
987,280
|
|
$
|
68,546
|
|
7
|
%
|
||||||
|
Service and other revenue
|
156,522
|
|
92,690
|
|
63,832
|
|
69
|
|
68,255
|
|
24,435
|
|
36
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
1,421,178
|
|
$
|
1,148,516
|
|
$
|
272,662
|
|
24
|
%
|
$
|
1,055,535
|
|
$
|
92,981
|
|
9
|
%
|
||||||
Product revenue consists primarily of revenue from sales of consumables and instruments. Services and other revenue consists primarily of instrument service contract revenue as well as sequencing and genotyping service revenue.
30
2013
Compared to
2012
Consumables revenue
increased
$151.0 million
, or
21%
, to
$880.3 million
in
2013
compared to
$729.3 million
in the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to increased sales of sequencing consumables, driven by the growth in the installed base for both HiSeq and MiSeq systems, as well as higher consumable sales per HiSeq instrument in the installed base.
Instrument revenue
increased
$57.2 million
, or
18%
, to
$371.5 million
in
2013
compared to
$314.3 million
in the prior year, driven primarily by an increase in HiSeq shipments.
The increase in service and other revenue in
2013
compared to the prior year was driven by an increase in sequencing service volume and instrument service contract revenue as a result of our growing installed base.
2012
Compared to
2011
Consumables revenue
increased
$133.5 million
, or
22%
, to
$729.3 million
in 2012 compared to
$595.8 million
in 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to increased sales of sequencing consumables, driven by higher consumable sales per HiSeq instrument and the growth in both the HiSeq and MiSeq installed base.
Instrument revenue
decreased
$58.8 million
, or
16%
, to
$314.3 million
in
2012
compared to
$373.1 million
in 2011, driven by a decrease in HiSeq shipments, partially offset by a full year of MiSeq shipments in
2012
as compared to less than two quarters of shipments in 2011.
Revenue in 2011 reflects the impact of discounts provided to customers under our Genome Analyzer trade-in program. The estimated incremental sales incentive provided under this trade-in program was approximately $11.1 million, based on the total discount provided from list price in excess of our average discount on HiSeq 2000 sales during the period. The Genome Analyzer trade-in program was completed in Q4 2011. See “Revenue Recognition” in note “1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Part II, Item 8, of this Form 10-K for additional information on the Genome Analyzer trade-in program.
The increase in service and other revenue in
2012
compared to 2011 was driven by an increase in our instrument service contract revenue as a result of our growing installed base as well as an increase in our genotyping and sequencing service revenue.
Gross Margin
|
2013 - 2012
|
2012 - 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
Change
|
% Change
|
2011
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total gross profit
|
$
|
911,887
|
|
$
|
773,528
|
|
$
|
138,359
|
|
18
|
%
|
$
|
709,098
|
|
$
|
64,430
|
|
9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total gross margin
|
64.2
|
%
|
67.4
|
%
|
67.2
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2013
Compared to
2012
Gross profit in
2013
increased
in comparison to the prior year, primarily due to the increase in revenue. Gross margin decreased in 2013 in comparison to the prior year, primarily due to impairments associated with the discontinuation of the Eco and NuPCR product lines, an increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets due to recent acquisitions, and an increase in legal contingencies, which had an aggregate impact to gross margins of 3.9%. Acquisitions also contributed to the decrease in gross margin. These decreases were partially offset by the favorable impacts from higher instrument margins, higher mix of sequencing consumables, and operational efficiencies.
2012
Compared to
2011
Gross profit in
2012
increased in comparison to
2011
primarily due to higher sales. Gross margin improved in 2012 due in large part to the shift in sales mix from instruments to consumables, which have a higher margin than instruments. This improvement was partially offset by a legal settlement charge recorded to cost of sales in 2012. In addition, instrument sales in 2011 were affected by promotional discounts provided to customers on HiSeq 2000 sales, including the Genome Analyzer
31
trade-in program. Based on the estimated amount of incremental sales incentive provided, the Genome Analyzer trade-in program negatively impacted our gross margin by approximately 1.1% in 2011. This trade-in program was completed in Q4 2011.
Operating Expense
|
2013 - 2012
|
2012 - 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
Change
|
% Change
|
2011
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Research and development
|
$
|
276,743
|
|
$
|
231,025
|
|
$
|
45,718
|
|
20
|
%
|
$
|
196,913
|
|
$
|
34,112
|
|
17
|
%
|
||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
381,040
|
|
285,991
|
|
95,049
|
|
33
|
|
261,843
|
|
24,148
|
|
9
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Legal contingencies
|
115,369
|
|
—
|
|
115,369
|
|
100
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Unsolicited tender offer related expense
|
13,621
|
|
23,136
|
|
(9,515
|
)
|
(41
|
)
|
—
|
|
23,136
|
|
100
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
(11,617
|
)
|
2,774
|
|
(14,391
|
)
|
(519
|
)
|
919
|
|
1,855
|
|
202
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Headquarter relocation
|
2,624
|
|
26,328
|
|
(23,704
|
)
|
(90
|
)
|
41,826
|
|
(15,498
|
)
|
(37
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Restructuring
|
—
|
|
3,522
|
|
(3,522
|
)
|
(100
|
)
|
8,136
|
|
(4,614
|
)
|
(57
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Total operating expense
|
$
|
777,780
|
|
$
|
572,776
|
|
$
|
205,004
|
|
36
|
%
|
$
|
509,637
|
|
$
|
63,139
|
|
12
|
%
|
||||||
2013
Compared to
2012
Research and development expense
increased
by
$45.7 million
, or
20%
, in
2013
from
2012
, primarily due to increased headcount and consulting services as we continue to increase our investment in the development of new products as well as enhancements to existing products. In 2012, we recorded a $21.4 million impairment charge for an in-process research and development asset. The lack of such charge in 2013 partially offset the increase in overall research and development expense.
Selling, general and administrative expense
increased
by
$95.0 million
, or
33%
in
2013
from
2012
. The increase is primarily driven by increased headcount and consulting services to support the growth of our Company and our focus on global business process improvements, as well as increased amortization of intangible assets.
Recently completed acquisitions also contributed to the increases in research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense.
During
2013
, we recorded
$115.4 million
in legal contingency charges within operating expenses primarily related to the Syntrix litigation matter. The amount recorded in operating expenses included the damages and prejudgment interest awarded to Syntrix through March 14, 2013, the jury verdict date. See additional discussions on this matter in note “10. Legal Proceedings” in Part II, Item 8 of this form 10-K
.
During
2013
, we recorded
$13.6 million
of expenses incurred in relation to an unsolicited tender offer in Q1 2012. The expenses consisted primarily of advisory and legal fees. The advisory related expenses decreased from the prior year as the advisory service arrangements were completed.
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net, in
2013
primarily consisted of gains from changes in fair value of contingent consideration of
$18.8 million
. Such gains were partially offset by transaction and other acquisition related costs of $7.2 million. Acquisition related (gain) expense, net in the prior year consisted of changes in fair value of contingent consideration of $2.0 million and transaction costs of $0.8 million.
We completed the relocation of our headquarters in 2012. During
2013
, we recorded additional cease-use loss due to a delay in the sublease of portions of our prior headquarters and accretion of interest expense related to the facility exit obligation recorded upon vacating our former headquarters. Headquarter relocation expense recorded in
2012
consisted of cease-use loss recorded upon vacating our prior headquarters, accretion expense related to the facility exit obligation, double rent expense during the transition to our new facility, and moving expenses.
In late 2011, we announced restructuring plans to reduce our global workforce and to consolidate certain facilities. As a result of the restructuring effort, we recorded additional restructuring charges of
$3.5 million
during
2012
, comprised primarily of severance pay and other employee separation costs. Restructuring activities were completed during 2012.
32
2012
Compared to
2011
Research and development expense increased by
$34.1 million
, or
17%
, in
2012
from
2011
primarily due to a
$21.4 million
impairment loss recognized for IPR&D recorded as a result of a prior acquisition and increased personnel expenses as we continue to increase our investment in projects to develop and commercialize new products. In addition, we incurred increased facilities expenses in 2012 as the rental fees for our current headquarters are higher than our prior facility.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased by
$24.1 million
in
2012
from
2011
. The increase is primarily driven by a $15.8 million increase in personnel expenses associated with increased headcount, and a $9.5 million increase in legal and other consulting fees. Personnel expenses included salaries, share-based compensation, and benefits. These increases in expense were partially offset by a $2.3 million decrease in bad debt expense, as certain customer bankruptcies impacted us in 2011. In addition, we had the benefit of a $2.3 million legal settlement gain recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2011.
During Q1 2012, CKH Acquisition Corporation and Roche Holding Ltd. (together, “Roche”) made an unsolicited tender offer to purchase all outstanding shares of our common stock for up to $51.00 per share. During 2012, we recorded
$23.1 million
of expenses incurred in relation to Roche’s unsolicited tender offer, consisting primarily of legal, advisory, and other professional fees.
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net
, in 2012 consisted of acquisition transaction costs of $0.8 million and changes in fair value of contingent consideration of
$2.0 million
.
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net
in 2011 consisted of gains related to changes in fair value of contingent consideration offset by acquired in-process research and development of $5.4 million related to a milestone payment for a prior acquisition.
In Q3 2012, we completed the relocation of our headquarters that started in 2011. During 2012, we incurred
$26.3 million
in additional headquarter relocation expense, primarily consisting of cease-use loss associated with vacating our prior headquarters, double rent expense during the transition to our new facility, and accretion of interest expense on the lease exit liability. Headquarter relocation expense recorded in 2011 consisted of accelerated depreciation and rent expense on the new facility during the transition period of occupying both the current and new facility.
In late 2011, we announced restructuring plans to reduce our global workforce and to consolidate certain facilities. As a result of the restructuring effort, we recorded additional restructuring charges of
$3.5 million
during 2012, comprised primarily of separation and other employee costs.
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
2013 - 2012
|
2012 - 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
Change
|
% Change
|
2011
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest income
|
$
|
4,887
|
|
$
|
16,208
|
|
$
|
(11,321
|
)
|
(70
|
)%
|
7,052
|
|
9,156
|
|
130
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(39,690
|
)
|
(37,779
|
)
|
(1,911
|
)
|
5
|
|
(34,790
|
)
|
(2,989
|
)
|
9
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Cost-method investment related gain, net
|
61,357
|
|
45,911
|
|
15,446
|
|
34
|
|
—
|
|
45,911
|
|
100
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Other expense, net
|
(1,347
|
)
|
(2,484
|
)
|
1,137
|
|
(46
|
)
|
(38,678
|
)
|
36,194
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
$
|
25,207
|
|
$
|
21,856
|
|
$
|
3,351
|
|
15
|
%
|
$
|
(66,416
|
)
|
$
|
88,272
|
|
(133
|
)%
|
||||||
2013
Compared to
2012
Interest income primarily consisted of returns from our investment portfolio. Interest income decreased in
2013
from
2012
as a result of a decrease in our investment portfolio balance as well as a decline in average market rates during the period. Furthermore, interest income in 2012 included a $6.0 million recovery of a note receivable. Interest expense in
2013
remained relatively consistent as compared to
2012
and consisted primarily of accretion of discount on our convertible senior notes.
In
2013
, we recognized
$61.4 million
in gains from sales of cost-method investments, of which $55.2 million related to the sale of our minority ownership interest in Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Cost-method investment related gain in 2012 consisted of a gain of $48.6 million on the sale of our minority ownership interest in deCODE Genetics, partially offset
33
by an impairment loss of $2.7 million on another cost-method investment that was determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
Other expense, net
, in
2013
and
2012
primarily consisted of net foreign exchange losses and losses on the extinguishment of debt recorded on conversions of our 0.625% convertible senior notes due 2014.
2012
Compared to
2011
Interest income increased in 2012 primarily due to a $6.0 million recovery of a previously impaired note receivable and an increase in realized gains from our investment portfolio. Interest expenses in both 2012 and 2011 are primarily comprised of accretion of the discount on our convertible senior notes.
Cost-method investment related gain in 2012 consisted of a gain of $48.6 million on the sale of our minority ownership interest in deCODE Genetics, partially offset by an impairment loss of $2.7 million on another cost-method investment that was determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
Other expense, net
in 2012 primarily consisted of foreign exchange losses.
Other expense, net
, in 2011 primarily consisted of a $37.6 million loss on the extinguishment of debt recorded on conversions of our 0.625% convertible senior notes due 2014.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
2013 - 2012
|
2012 - 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
Change
|
% Change
|
2011
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
159,314
|
|
$
|
222,608
|
|
$
|
(63,294
|
)
|
(28
|
)%
|
$
|
133,045
|
|
$
|
89,563
|
|
67
|
%
|
||||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
34,006
|
|
71,354
|
|
(37,348
|
)
|
(52
|
)
|
46,417
|
|
24,937
|
|
54
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
125,308
|
|
$
|
151,254
|
|
$
|
(25,946
|
)
|
(17
|
)%
|
$
|
86,628
|
|
$
|
64,626
|
|
75
|
%
|
||||||
|
Effective tax rate
|
21.3
|
%
|
32.1
|
%
|
34.9
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2013
Compared to
2012
Our effective tax rate was
21.3%
in
2013
, as compared to
32.1%
in 2012. The variance from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% in 2013 was primarily attributable to a higher mix of foreign earnings taxed at rates lower than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and the retroactive reinstatement of the federal research and development credit for 2012 which was enacted in January 2013. These items offset the impact of recording a valuation allowance which was primarily related to the estimated limitation on utilizing foreign tax credits in the U.S. In 2012 the variance from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% was primarily attributable to the change in the mix of earnings in tax jurisdictions with different statutory rates.
The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which was signed into law on January 2, 2013, included the retroactive reinstatement of the federal research and development credit from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013. Our provision for income taxes for the year ended December 30, 2012 did not include the impact of the federal research credit generated in 2012 since the law was enacted subsequent to our 2012 reporting period. Instead, the retroactive reinstatement of the federal research credit generated in 2012 reduced our provision for income taxes for 2013 by approximately $2.9 million.
2012
Compared to
2011
Our effective tax rate was
32.1%
for 2012. The variance from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% was primarily attributable to the change in the mix of earnings in tax jurisdictions with different statutory rates. The effective tax rate in 2011 was 34.9%, which closely approximated the U.S. federal statutory tax rate because a significant portion of our earnings were subject to U.S. taxation.
34
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At
December 29, 2013
, we had approximately
$711.6 million
in cash and cash equivalents, a
$277.7 million
increase from last year, due to the factors described in the “Cash Flow Summary” below. Our primary source of liquidity, other than our holdings of cash, cash equivalents, and investments, has been cash flows from operations. Our ability to generate cash from operations provides us with the financial flexibility we need to meet operating, investing, and financing needs. Cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries at
December 29, 2013
were approximately
$412.6 million
. It is our intention to indefinitely reinvest all current and future foreign earnings in foreign subsidiaries.
Historically, we have liquidated our short-term investments and/or issued debt and equity securities to finance our business needs as a supplement to cash provided by operating activities. At
December 29, 2013
, we have
$454.0 million
in short-term investments. Our short-term investments include marketable securities consisting of debt securities in government-sponsored entities, corporate debt securities, and U.S. Treasury notes.
We anticipate that our current cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, together with cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to fund our near term capital and operating needs for at least the next 12 months. Operating needs include the planned costs to operate our business, including amounts required to fund working capital and capital expenditures. Our primary short-term needs for capital, which are subject to change, include expenditures related to:
|
•
|
support of commercialization efforts related to our current and future products, including expansion of our direct sales force and field support resources both in the United States and abroad;
|
|
•
|
acquisitions of equipment and other fixed assets for use in our current and future manufacturing and research and development facilities;
|
|
•
|
repurchases of our outstanding common stock;
|
|
•
|
the continued advancement of research and development efforts;
|
|
•
|
potential strategic acquisitions and investments;
|
|
•
|
repayments of debt obligations; and
|
|
•
|
the expansion needs of our facilities, including costs of leasing additional facilities.
|
As of
December 29, 2013
,
$29.6 million
principal amount of our 0.625% convertible senior notes due 2014 remained outstanding, with a maturity date of
February 15, 2014
. $920.0 million in principal amount of our convertible senior notes due 2016 (“2016 Notes”) remained outstanding as of
December 29, 2013
. The 2016 Notes are convertible into cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock prior to maturity if the trading price of our common stock remains at least 130% above $83.55 for a sustained period. It is our intent and policy to settle conversions of the 2016 Notes through combination settlement, which essentially involves repayment of an amount of cash equal to the principal amount and delivery of the excess of conversion value over the principal amount in shares of common stock.
As of
December 29, 2013
, we have
$49.5 million
in fair value of contingent considerations associated with prior acquisitions to be settled in future periods.
Our Board of Directors authorized several common stock repurchase programs. In 2013, we used
$50.0 million
to repurchase our outstanding shares under these programs. As of
December 29, 2013
, we had authorization from our Board of Directors to repurchase up to an additional
$117.5 million
of our common stock. On January 30, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized an additional $250.0 million to repurchase shares of our common stock on a discretionary basis. In July 2013, the Company settled with a hedging counterparty outstanding warrants to purchase approximately 3.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock for $125.0 million in cash.
We expect that our revenue and the resulting operating income, as well as the status of each of our new product development programs, will significantly impact our cash management decisions.
Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including:
|
•
|
our ability to successfully commercialize and further develop our technologies and create innovative products in our markets;
|
|
•
|
scientific progress in our research and development programs and the magnitude of those programs;
|
|
•
|
competing technological and market developments; and
|
35
|
•
|
the need to enter into collaborations with other companies or acquire other companies or technologies to enhance or complement our product and service offerings.
|
Cash flow Summary
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
386,421
|
|
$
|
291,873
|
|
$
|
358,140
|
|
||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(69,649
|
)
|
(150,012
|
)
|
(400,999
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(38,719
|
)
|
(10,755
|
)
|
97,016
|
|
|||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(397
|
)
|
(103
|
)
|
(126
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
277,656
|
|
$
|
131,003
|
|
$
|
54,031
|
|
||
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities in
2013
consisted of net income of
$125.3 million
, net adjustments of
$107.7 million
, and a change in net operating assets and liabilities of
$153.4 million
. The primary non-cash expenses added back to net income included share-based compensation of
$105.8 million
, depreciation and amortization expenses related to property and equipment and intangible assets of
$97.9 million
, accretion of debt discount of
$36.2 million
, and impairments of
$25.2 million
. The adjustments to net income also included
$61.4 million
in cost-method investment related gain,
$36.7 million
in deferred income taxes, and
$56.7 million
in incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation. The main driver in the change in net operating assets was an increase in legal contingencies due to a patent litigation.
Cash provided by operating activities in
2012
consisted of net income of
$151.3 million
plus net adjustments of
$158.6 million
, offset by a change in net operating assets of
$18.0 million
. The primary non-cash expenses added back to net income included share-based compensation of
$94.3 million
, depreciation and amortization expenses related to property and equipment and intangible assets of
$65.3 million
, impairment of IPR&D of
$21.4 million
, and the accretion of debt discount of
$35.0 million
. The adjustments to net income also included
$20.8 million
in incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation,
$45.9 million
in net cost-method investment related gain, and
$6.0 million
in recovery of a previously impaired note receivable. The main drivers in the change in net operating assets included increases in accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities.
Cash provided by operating activities in
2011
consisted of net income of
$86.6 million
plus net adjustments of
$236.5 million
and changes in net operating assets of
$35.0 million
. The primary non-cash expenses added back to net income included share-based compensation of
$92.1 million
, depreciation and amortization expenses related to property and equipment and intangible assets of
$69.2 million
, debt extinguishment loss of
$37.6 million
, and the accretion of debt discount of
$32.2 million
. The adjustments to net income also included
$46.4 million
in incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation. The main drivers in the change in net operating assets included increases in accrued liabilities, and decreases in inventory and accounts payable.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities totaled
$69.6 million
in
2013
. We purchased
$364.0 million
of available-for-sale securities and
$812.8 million
of our available-for-sale securities matured or were sold during the period. We also paid net cash of
$523.5 million
for acquisitions, and invested
$79.2 million
in capital expenditures primarily associated with the purchase of manufacturing, research, and development equipment, leasehold improvements, and information technology equipment and systems.
Cash used in investing activities totaled
$150.0 million
in
2012
. We purchased
$925.5 million
of available-for-sale securities and
$898.8 million
of our available-for-sale securities matured or were sold during the period. We received
$50.8 million
in proceeds from a sale of a cost-method investment and used
$15.9 million
for purchases of strategic investments. We also paid net cash of
$83.2 million
for acquisitions, used
$12.2 million
for purchases of intangible assets, and invested
$68.8 million
in capital expenditures primarily associated with the purchase of manufacturing and servicing equipment, leasehold improvements, and information technology equipment and systems. In addition, we received
$6.0 million
from recovery of a note previously impaired.
36
Cash used in investing activities totaled
$401.0 million
in
2011
. During the year we purchased
$1.3 billion
of available-for-sale securities, and
$1.1 billion
of our available-for-sale securities matured or were sold during
2011
. We used
$58.3 million
, net of cash acquired, in an acquisition and
$13.8 million
in the purchases of strategic investments. We also incurred
$77.8 million
in capital expenditures primarily associated with the purchase of manufacturing, R&D, and servicing equipment, leasehold improvements, and information technology equipment and systems.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities totaled
$38.7 million
in
2013
. We received
$94.5 million
in proceeds from the issuance of common stock through the exercise of stock options and the sale of shares under our employee stock purchase plan, used
$50.0 million
to repurchase our common stock, and used
$125.0 million
for retirement of warrants. In addition, we received
$56.7 million
in incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation.
Cash used in financing activities totaled
$10.8 million
in
2012
. We received
$54.4 million
in proceeds from the issuance of common stock through the exercise of stock options and warrants and under our employee stock purchase plan. We used
$82.5 million
to repurchase our common stock in 2012. In addition, we received
$20.8 million
in incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation.
Cash provided by financing activities totaled
$97.0 million
in
2011
. We received
$903.5 million
in proceeds from the issuance of $920.0 million of our 0.25% convertible senior notes due 2016, net of issuance discounts, of which
$349.9 million
was used to repay the principal amount of our 0.625% convertible senior notes due 2014 upon conversions in 2011. We used
$570.4 million
in repurchases of our common stock. We also received
$67.5 million
in proceeds from the issuance of our common stock through the exercise of stock options and warrants and under our employee stock purchase plan. In addition, we received
$46.4 million
in incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not participate in any transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. During the fiscal year ended
December 29, 2013
, we were not involved in any “off-balance sheet arrangements” within the meaning of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations represent future cash commitments and liabilities under agreements with third parties, and exclude orders for goods and services entered into in the normal course of business that are not enforceable or legally binding. The following table represents our contractual obligations as of
December 29, 2013
, aggregated by type (amounts in thousands):
|
|
Payments Due by Period(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
More Than
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Contractual Obligation
|
Total
|
1 Year
|
1 – 3 Years
|
3 – 5 Years
|
5 Years
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Debt obligations(2)
|
$
|
955,412
|
|
$
|
31,962
|
|
$
|
923,450
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Leases
|
553,619
|
|
30,400
|
|
60,615
|
|
67,262
|
|
395,342
|
|
||||||||||
|
Purchase obligations
|
15,132
|
|
9,063
|
|
5,007
|
|
1,062
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Amounts due under executive deferred compensation plan
|
14,957
|
|
14,957
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,539,120
|
|
$
|
86,382
|
|
$
|
989,072
|
|
$
|
68,324
|
|
$
|
395,342
|
|
|||||
_______________________________________
|
(1)
|
The table excludes
$132.9 million
of contingent legal liability,
$128.0 million
of contingent consideration payments related to acquisitions, and
$49.0 million
of uncertain tax positions. These items were excluded because we cannot make reasonably reliable estimates regarding the timing and amounts of the settlement of such contingent payments or uncertain positions, if any. See notes “10. Legal Proceedings”, “3. Acquisitions”, and “11. Income Taxes”, respectively, in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussions of these items.
|
37
|
(2)
|
Debt obligations include the principal amount of our convertible senior notes due 2016 and 2014, as well as interest payments to be made under the notes. Although these notes mature in 2016 and 2014 respectively, they can be converted into cash and shares of our common stock prior to maturity if certain conditions are met. Any conversion prior to maturity can result in repayments of the principal amounts sooner than the scheduled repayments as indicated in the table. See note “6. Convertible Senior Notes” in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion of the terms of the convertible senior notes.
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience, market and other conditions, and various other assumptions it believes to be reasonable. Although these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions that may impact us in the future, the estimation process is, by its nature, uncertain given that estimates depend on events over which we may not have control. If market and other conditions change from those that we anticipate, our consolidated financial statements may be materially affected. In addition, if our assumptions change, we may need to revise our estimates, or take other corrective actions, either of which may also have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies and estimates have a higher degree of inherent uncertainty and require our most significant judgments. In addition, had we used estimates different from any of these, our consolidated financial statements could have been materially different from those presented. Members of our senior management have discussed the development and selection of our critical accounting policies and estimates, and our disclosure regarding them, with the audit committee of our board of directors. Our accounting policies are more fully described in note “1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies” in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Revenue Recognition
Our revenue is generated primarily from the sale of products and services. Product revenue primarily consists of sales of instruments and consumables used in genetic analysis. Service and other revenue primarily consists of revenue generated from genotyping and sequencing services and instrument service contracts. The timing of revenue recognition and the amount of revenue recognized in each case depends upon a variety of factors, including the specific terms of each arrangement and the nature of our deliverables and obligations. Determination of the appropriate amount of revenue recognized involves significant judgment and estimates.
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product or system is required, revenue is deferred until all the acceptance criteria have been met. All revenue is recorded net of discounts.
Revenue for product sales is recognized generally upon transfer of title to the customer, provided that no significant obligations remain and collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. Revenue from instrument service contracts is recognized as the services are rendered, typically evenly over the contract term. Revenue from genotyping and sequencing services is recognized when earned, which is generally at the time the genotyping or sequencing analysis data is made available to the customer or agreed upon milestones are reached.
In order to assess whether the price is fixed or determinable, we evaluate whether refund rights exist. If there are refund rights or payment terms based on future performance, we defer revenue recognition until the price becomes fixed or determinable. We assess collectibility based on a number of factors, including past transaction history and the creditworthiness of the customer. If we determine that collection of a payment is not reasonably assured, revenue recognition is deferred until receipt of payment.
We regularly enter into contracts where revenue is derived from multiple deliverables including products or services. These products or services are generally delivered within a short time frame, approximately three to six months, of the contract execution date. Revenue recognition for contracts with multiple deliverables is based on the individual units of accounting determined to exist in the contract. A delivered item is considered a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Items are considered to have stand-alone value when they are sold separately by any vendor or when the customer could resell the item on a stand-alone basis.
38
For transactions with multiple deliverables, consideration is allocated at the inception of the contract to all deliverables based on their relative selling price. The relative selling price for each deliverable is determined using vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of selling price or third-party evidence of selling price if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor third-party evidence exists, we use best estimate of the selling price for the deliverable.
In order to establish VSOE of selling price, we must regularly sell the product or service on a standalone basis with a substantial majority priced within a relatively narrow range. VSOE of selling price is usually the midpoint of that range. If there are not a sufficient number of standalone sales and VSOE of selling price cannot be determined, then we consider whether third party evidence can be used to establish selling price. Due to the lack of similar products and services sold by other companies within the industry, we have rarely established selling price using third-party evidence. If neither VSOE nor third party evidence of selling price exists, we determine our best estimate of selling price using average selling prices over a rolling 12-month period coupled with an assessment of current market conditions. If the product or service has no history of sales or if the sales volume is not sufficient, we rely upon prices set by our pricing committee adjusted for applicable discounts. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when we determine there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
In certain markets, the Company sells products and provides services to customers through distributors that specialize in life science products. In most sales through distributors, the product is delivered directly to customers. In cases where the product is delivered to a distributor, revenue recognition is deferred until acceptance is received from the distributor, and/or the end-user, if required by the applicable sales contract. The terms of sales transactions through distributors are consistent with the terms of direct sales to customers. These transactions are accounted for in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy described herein.
Investments
We invest in various types of securities, including debt securities in government-sponsored entities, corporate debt securities, and U.S. Treasury securities. As of
December 29, 2013
, we have
$454.0 million
in short-term investments. In accordance with the accounting standard for fair value measurements, we classify our investments as Level 1, 2, or 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets that we have the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable data points for the asset.
As discussed in note “5. Fair Value Measurements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, a majority of our security holdings have been classified as Level 2. These securities have been initially valued at the transaction price and subsequently valued utilizing a third party service provider who assesses the fair value using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly, such as yield curve, volatility factors, credit spreads, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments or debt, broker and dealer quotes, as well as other relevant economic measures. We perform certain procedures to corroborate the fair value of these holdings, and in the process, we apply judgment and estimates that if changed, could significantly affect our statement of financial positions.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. We regularly analyze customer accounts, review the length of time receivables are outstanding, review historical loss rates and assess current economic trends that may impact the level of credit losses in the future. Our gross trade accounts receivables totaled
$242.6 million
and the allowance for doubtful accounts was
$3.7 million
at
December 29, 2013
. Our allowance for doubtful accounts has generally been adequate to cover our actual credit losses. However, since we cannot reliably predict future changes in the financial stability of our customers, we may need to increase our reserves if the financial conditions of our customers deteriorate.
39
Inventory Valuation
Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market. We record adjustments to inventory for potentially excess, obsolete, or impaired goods in order to state inventory at net realizable value. We must make assumptions about future demand, market conditions, and the release of new products that will supersede old ones. We regularly review inventory for excess and obsolete products and components, taking into account product life cycles, quality issues, historical experience, and usage forecasts. Our gross inventory totaled
$172.0 million
and the cumulative adjustment for potentially excess and obsolete inventory was
$17.9 million
at
December 29, 2013
. Historically, our inventory adjustment has been adequate to cover our losses. However, if actual market conditions are less favorable than anticipated, additional inventory adjustments could be required.
Contingencies
We are involved in various lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to intellectual property, employment, and contractual matters. In connection with these matters, we assess, on a regular basis, the probability and range of possible loss based on the developments in these matters. A liability is recorded in the financial statements if it is believed to be probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable and unfavorable resolutions could occur, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. We regularly review outstanding legal matters to determine the adequacy of the liabilities accrued and related disclosures in consideration of many factors, which include, but are not limited to, past history, scientific and other evidence, and the specifics and status of each matter. We may change our estimates if our assessment of the various factors changes and the amount of ultimate loss may differ from our estimates, resulting in a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows.
Business Combinations
Under the acquisition method of accounting, we allocate the fair value of the total consideration transferred to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The fair values assigned, defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants, are based on estimates and assumptions determined by management. We record the excess consideration over the aggregate fair value of tangible and intangible assets, net of liabilities assumed, as goodwill. These valuations require us to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, additional contingent consideration is earned by the sellers upon completion of certain future performance milestones. In these cases, a liability is recorded on the acquisition date for an estimate of the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration by applying the income approach utilizing variable inputs such as anticipated future cash flows, risk-free adjusted discount rates, and nonperformance risk. Any change in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date is recognized in acquisition related (gain) expense, net, a component of operating expenses, in our consolidated statements of income. This method requires significant management judgment, including the probability of achieving certain future milestones and discount rates. Future changes in our estimates could result in expenses or gains.
Management typically uses the discounted cash flow method to value our acquired intangible assets. This method requires significant management judgment to forecast future operating results and establish residual growth rates and discount factors. The estimates we use to value and amortize intangible assets are consistent with the plans and estimates that we use to manage our business and are based on available historical information and industry estimates and averages. If the subsequent actual results and updated projections of the underlying business activity change compared with the assumptions and projections used to develop these values, we could experience impairment charges. In addition, we have estimated the economic lives of certain acquired assets and these lives are used to calculate depreciation and amortization expense. If our estimates of the economic lives change, depreciation or amortization expenses could be accelerated or slowed.
Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets — Impairment Assessments
We regularly perform reviews to determine if the carrying values of our long-lived assets are impaired. A review of identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets is performed when an event occurs indicating the potential for impairment. If indicators of impairment exist, we assess the recoverability of the affected long-lived assets and compare their fair values to the respective carrying amounts.
40
In order to estimate the fair value of identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets, we estimate the present value of future cash flows from those assets. The key assumptions that we use in our discounted cash flow model are the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the asset over an extended period of time and a rate of return that considers the relative risk of achieving the cash flows, the time value of money, and other factors that a willing market participant would consider. Significant judgment is required to estimate the amount and timing of future cash flows and the relative risk of achieving those cash flows.
Assumptions and estimates about future values and remaining useful lives are complex and often subjective. They can be affected by a variety of factors, including external factors such as industry and economic trends, and internal factors such as changes in our business strategy and our internal forecasts. For example, if our future operating results do not meet current forecasts or if we experience a sustained decline in our market capitalization that is determined to be indicative of a reduction in fair value of our reporting unit, we may be required to record future impairment charges for purchased intangible assets. Impairment charges could materially decrease our future net income and result in lower asset values on our balance sheet.
Share-Based Compensation
We are required to measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments based on estimated fair value. We estimate the fair value of stock options granted and stock purchases under our employee stock purchase plan using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option-pricing model. The fair value of our restricted stock units is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of grant.
The determination of fair value of share-based awards using the BSM model requires the use of certain estimates and highly judgmental assumptions that affect the amount of share-based compensation expense recognized in our consolidated statements of income. These include estimates of the expected volatility of our stock price, expected life of an award, expected dividends, and the risk-free interest rate. We determine the volatility of our stock price by equally weighing the historical and implied volatility of our common stock. The historical volatility of our common stock over the most recent period is generally commensurate with the estimated expected life of our stock awards, adjusted for the impact of unusual fluctuations not reasonably expected to recur, and other relevant factors. Implied volatility is calculated from the implied market volatility of exchange-traded call options on our common stock. The expected life of an award is based on historical forfeiture experience, exercise activity, and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards. We determined expected dividend yield to be 0% given we have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and we currently do not anticipate paying such cash dividends. The risk-free interest rate is based upon U.S. Treasury securities with remaining terms similar to the expected term of the share-based awards. We amortize the fair value of share-based compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, share-based compensation expense may differ materially from what we have recorded in the current period.
Warranties
We generally provide a one-year warranty on instruments. Additionally, we provide a warranty on consumables through the expiration date, which generally ranges from six to twelve months after the manufacture date. We establish an accrual for estimated warranty expenses based on historical experience as well as anticipated product performance. We periodically review the adequacy of our warranty reserve, and adjust, if necessary, the warranty percentage and accrual based on actual experience and estimated costs to be incurred. If our estimates of warranty obligation change or if actual product performance is below our expectations we may incur additional warranty expense.
Cease-Use Loss upon Exit of Facility
We may, from time to time, relocate or consolidate our office locations and cease to use a facility for which the lease continues beyond the cease-use date. We estimate cease-use loss as the present value of the remaining lease obligation offset by estimated sublease rental receipts during the remaining lease period, adjusted for deferred items and leasehold improvements. In this process, management is required to make significant judgments to estimate the present value of future cash flows from the assumed sublease, including the amount and timing of estimated sublease rental receipts, and the risk-adjusted discount rate. These assumptions are subjective in nature and the actual future cash flows could differ from our estimates, resulting in significant adjustments to the cease-use loss recorded.
41
Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits reflect our best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid. Significant judgments and estimates based on interpretations of existing tax laws or regulations in the United States and the numerous foreign jurisdictions where we are subject to income tax are required in determining our provision for income taxes. Changes in tax laws, statutory tax rates, and estimates of the company’s future taxable income could impact the deferred tax assets and liabilities provided for in the consolidated financial statements and would require an adjustment to the provision for income taxes.
Deferred tax assets are regularly assessed to determine the likelihood they will be recovered from future taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when we believe it is more likely than not the future realization of all or some of a deferred tax asset will not be achieved. In evaluating our ability to recover deferred tax assets within the jurisdiction which they arise, we consider all available positive and negative evidence. Factors reviewed include the cumulative pre-tax book income for the past three years, scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, our history of earnings and reliability of our forecasts, projections of pre-tax book income over the foreseeable future, and the impact of any feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. Based on the available evidence as of
December 29, 2013
, we were not able to conclude it is more likely than not certain U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized. Therefore, we recorded a valuation allowance of
$19.1 million
against certain U.S. deferred tax assets.
We recognize the impact of a tax position in our financial statements only if that position is more likely than not of being sustained upon examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. Tax authorities regularly examine our returns in the jurisdictions in which we do business and we regularly assess the tax risk of the company’s return filing positions. Due to the complexity of some of the uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in payments that are materially different from our current estimate of the tax liability. These differences, as well as any interest and penalties, will be reflected in the provision for income taxes in the period in which they are determined.
|
ITEM 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Our investment portfolio is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. The fair market value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates while income earned on floating rate securities may decline as a result of decreases in interest rates. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. We attempt to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk, and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in investment grade securities. We have historically maintained a relatively short average maturity for our investment portfolio, and we believe a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments. In addition, if a 100 basis point change in overall interest rates were to occur in
2014
, our interest income would change by approximately
$11.7 million
in relation to amounts we would expect to earn, based on our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments as of
December 29, 2013
.
Changes in interest rates may also impact gains or losses from the conversion of our outstanding convertible senior notes.
During 2011, we issued
$920 million
in aggregate principal amount of our
0.25%
convertible senior notes due 2016. At our election, the notes are convertible into cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock in each case under certain circumstances, including trading price conditions related to our common stock. If the trading price of our common stock reaches a price for a sustained period at 130% above the conversion price of
$83.55
, the notes will become convertible. Upon conversion, we are required to record a gain or loss for the difference between the fair value of the debt to be extinguished and its corresponding net carrying value. The fair value of the debt to be extinguished depends on our then-current incremental borrowing rate. If our incremental borrowing rate at the time of conversion is higher or lower than the implied interest rate of the notes, we will record a gain or loss in our consolidated statement of income during the period in which the notes are converted. The implicit interest rate for the notes is
4.5%
. An incremental borrowing rate that is a hypothetical 100 basis points lower than the implicit interest rate upon conversion of $100 million aggregate principal amount of the notes would result in a loss of approximately
$2.2 million
.
42
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We conduct a portion of our business in currencies other than the company’s U.S. dollar functional currency. These transactions give rise to monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The value of these monetary assets and liabilities are subject to changes in currency exchange rates from the time the transactions are originated until settlement in cash. Our foreign currency exposures are primarily concentrated in the Euro, Yen, British pound sterling, Australian dollar, and Singapore dollar. Both realized and unrealized gains or losses on the value of these monetary assets and liabilities are included in the determination of net income. We recorded a
$4.3 million
net currency exchange loss for the fiscal year ended
December 29, 2013
on business transactions, excluding hedging transactions, which are included in other income (expense), net, in our consolidated statements of income.
We use forward exchange contracts to manage a portion of the foreign currency exposure risk for foreign subsidiaries with monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We only use derivative financial instruments to reduce foreign currency exchange rate risks; we do not hold any derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We primarily use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposures, and they generally have terms of one month or less. Realized and unrealized gains or losses on the value of financial contracts entered into to hedge the exchange rate exposure of these monetary assets and liabilities are also included in the determination of net income, as they have not been designated for hedge accounting. These contracts, which settle monthly, effectively fix the exchange rate at which these specific monetary assets and liabilities will be settled, so that gains or losses on the forward contracts offset the gains or losses from changes in the value of the underlying monetary assets and liabilities. As of
December 29, 2013
, the total notional amount of outstanding forward contracts in place for foreign currency purchases was
$54.7 million
.
43
|
ITEM 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Page
|
44
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Illumina, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Illumina, Inc. as of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
December 29, 2013
. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Illumina, Inc. at
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
December 29, 2013
, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Illumina, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 29, 2013
, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated
February 18, 2014
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ E
RNST
& Y
OUNG
LLP
San Diego, California
February 18, 2014
45
ILLUMINA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except par value)
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
||||||
|
ASSETS
|
|||||||
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
711,637
|
|
$
|
433,981
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
453,966
|
|
916,223
|
|
|||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
238,946
|
|
214,975
|
|
|||
|
Inventory
|
154,099
|
|
158,718
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax assets, current portion
|
36,076
|
|
30,451
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
22,811
|
|
32,700
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
1,617,535
|
|
1,787,048
|
|
|||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
202,666
|
|
166,167
|
|
|||
|
Goodwill
|
723,061
|
|
369,327
|
|
|||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
331,173
|
|
130,196
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax assets, long-term portion
|
88,480
|
|
40,183
|
|
|||
|
Other assets
|
56,091
|
|
73,164
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,019,006
|
|
$
|
2,566,085
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
73,655
|
|
$
|
65,727
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
219,120
|
|
201,877
|
|
|||
|
Long-term debt, current portion
|
29,288
|
|
36,967
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
322,063
|
|
304,571
|
|
|||
|
Long-term debt
|
839,305
|
|
805,406
|
|
|||
|
Long-term legal contingencies
|
132,933
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
191,221
|
|
134,369
|
|
|||
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Conversion option subject to cash settlement
|
282
|
|
3,158
|
|
|||
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Preferred stock: $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 320,000 shares authorized; 175,205 shares issued and 127,723 outstanding at December 29, 2013; 170,171 shares issued and 123,943 outstanding at December 30, 2012
|
1,753
|
|
1,703
|
|
|||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
2,562,705
|
|
2,419,831
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
1,234
|
|
2,123
|
|
|||
|
Retained earnings
|
207,855
|
|
82,547
|
|
|||
|
Treasury stock, 47,482 shares and 46,228 shares at cost at December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, respectively
|
(1,240,345
|
)
|
(1,187,623
|
)
|
|||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
1,533,202
|
|
1,318,581
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
3,019,006
|
|
$
|
2,566,085
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
ILLUMINA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Product revenue
|
$
|
1,264,656
|
|
$
|
1,055,826
|
|
$
|
987,280
|
|
||
|
Service and other revenue
|
156,522
|
|
92,690
|
|
68,255
|
|
|||||
|
Total revenue
|
1,421,178
|
|
1,148,516
|
|
1,055,535
|
|
|||||
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cost of product revenue
|
407,877
|
|
317,283
|
|
308,228
|
|
|||||
|
Cost of service and other revenue
|
67,811
|
|
43,552
|
|
26,118
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
33,603
|
|
14,153
|
|
12,091
|
|
|||||
|
Total cost of revenue
|
509,291
|
|
374,988
|
|
346,437
|
|
|||||
|
Gross profit
|
911,887
|
|
773,528
|
|
709,098
|
|
|||||
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Research and development
|
276,743
|
|
231,025
|
|
196,913
|
|
|||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
381,040
|
|
285,991
|
|
261,843
|
|
|||||
|
Legal contingencies
|
115,369
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Unsolicited tender offer related expense
|
13,621
|
|
23,136
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
(11,617
|
)
|
2,774
|
|
919
|
|
|||||
|
Headquarter relocation
|
2,624
|
|
26,328
|
|
41,826
|
|
|||||
|
Restructuring
|
—
|
|
3,522
|
|
8,136
|
|
|||||
|
Total operating expense
|
777,780
|
|
572,776
|
|
509,637
|
|
|||||
|
Income from operations
|
134,107
|
|
200,752
|
|
199,461
|
|
|||||
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interest income
|
4,887
|
|
16,208
|
|
7,052
|
|
|||||
|
Interest expense
|
(39,690
|
)
|
(37,779
|
)
|
(34,790
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cost-method investment related gain, net
|
61,357
|
|
45,911
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other expense, net
|
(1,347
|
)
|
(2,484
|
)
|
(38,678
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
25,207
|
|
21,856
|
|
(66,416
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
159,314
|
|
222,608
|
|
133,045
|
|
|||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
34,006
|
|
71,354
|
|
46,417
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
125,308
|
|
$
|
151,254
|
|
$
|
86,628
|
|
||
|
Net income per basic share
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
||
|
Net income per diluted share
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
||
|
Shares used in calculating basic net income per share
|
125,076
|
|
122,999
|
|
123,399
|
|
|||||
|
Shares used in calculating diluted net income per share
|
139,936
|
|
133,693
|
|
138,937
|
|
|||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
ILLUMINA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
Years Ended
|
|||||||||||
|
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
125,308
|
|
$
|
151,254
|
|
$
|
86,628
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax
|
(889
|
)
|
6
|
|
352
|
|
||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
$
|
124,419
|
|
$
|
151,260
|
|
$
|
86,980
|
|
|||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
48
ILLUMINA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
Additional
|
Accumulated Other
|
Retained Earnings
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Common Stock
|
Paid-In
|
Comprehensive
|
(Accumulated
|
Treasury Stock
|
Stockholders’
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Income
|
Deficit)
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of January 2, 2011
|
151,513
|
|
1,516
|
|
1,891,288
|
|
1,765
|
|
(155,335
|
)
|
(24,904
|
)
|
(541,559
|
)
|
1,197,675
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
86,628
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
86,628
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
352
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
352
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock, net of repurchases
|
15,194
|
|
152
|
|
104,268
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(19,990
|
)
|
(572,207
|
)
|
(467,787
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Convertible note, equity portion, net of tax and issuance costs
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
155,366
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
155,366
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Tax impact from the issuance of convertible debt
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(59,427
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(59,427
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Tax benefit related to conversions of convertible debt
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
11,409
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
11,409
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Reclassification of conversion option subject to cash settlement
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,667
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,667
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
92,153
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
92,153
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
43,122
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
43,122
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Equity based contingent compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,457
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,457
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Issuance of treasury stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
597
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
229
|
|
4,003
|
|
4,600
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2012
|
166,707
|
|
1,668
|
|
2,249,900
|
|
2,117
|
|
(68,707
|
)
|
(44,665
|
)
|
(1,109,763
|
)
|
1,075,215
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
151,254
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
151,254
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock, net of repurchases
|
3,464
|
|
35
|
|
55,106
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,875
|
)
|
(83,306
|
)
|
(28,165
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Reclassification of conversion option subject to cash settlement
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,565
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,565
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
94,385
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
94,385
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
17,015
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
17,015
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Equity based contingent compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,306
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,306
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Issuance of treasury stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(5,446
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
312
|
|
5,446
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 30, 2012
|
170,171
|
|
1,703
|
|
2,419,831
|
|
2,123
|
|
82,547
|
|
(46,228
|
)
|
(1,187,623
|
)
|
1,318,581
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
125,308
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
125,308
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(889
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(889
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock, net of repurchases
|
5,034
|
|
50
|
|
98,215
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,254
|
)
|
(52,722
|
)
|
45,543
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Reclassification of conversion option subject to cash settlement
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,338
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,338
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
105,771
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
105,771
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
53,032
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
53,032
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Equity based contingent compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,278
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,278
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fair value of options assumed in acquisition
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
240
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
240
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Warrant retirement
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(125,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(125,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 29, 2013
|
175,205
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
$
|
2,562,705
|
|
$
|
1,234
|
|
$
|
207,855
|
|
(47,482
|
)
|
$
|
(1,240,345
|
)
|
$
|
1,533,202
|
|
|||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
49
|
ILLUMINA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
125,308
|
|
$
|
151,254
|
|
$
|
86,628
|
|
||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation expense
|
50,810
|
|
48,249
|
|
55,575
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
47,115
|
|
17,070
|
|
13,617
|
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
105,826
|
|
94,324
|
|
92,092
|
|
|||||
|
Accretion of debt discount
|
36,237
|
|
35,004
|
|
32,173
|
|
|||||
|
Change in facility exit obligation
|
2,624
|
|
22,367
|
|
23,638
|
|
|||||
|
Contingent compensation expense
|
8,278
|
|
6,306
|
|
3,457
|
|
|||||
|
Incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation
|
(56,678
|
)
|
(20,783
|
)
|
(46,354
|
)
|
|||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
(36,663
|
)
|
(21,698
|
)
|
19,227
|
|
|||||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
(18,784
|
)
|
1,975
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cost-method investment related gain, net
|
(61,357
|
)
|
(45,911
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Impairments
|
25,214
|
|
21,438
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
555
|
|
—
|
|
37,611
|
|
|||||
|
Other
|
4,533
|
|
251
|
|
9,949
|
|
|||||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
(15,928
|
)
|
(34,441
|
)
|
(7,011
|
)
|
|||||
|
Inventory
|
6,217
|
|
(23,707
|
)
|
22,152
|
|
|||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
1,783
|
|
(3,062
|
)
|
(2,016
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other assets
|
(16,357
|
)
|
(2,903
|
)
|
(4,004
|
)
|
|||||
|
Accounts payable
|
2,389
|
|
15,112
|
|
(21,097
|
)
|
|||||
|
Accrued liabilities
|
38,550
|
|
24,388
|
|
38,945
|
|
|||||
|
Long-term legal contingencies
|
132,933
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
3,816
|
|
6,640
|
|
8,058
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
386,421
|
|
291,873
|
|
358,140
|
|
|||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
(364,001
|
)
|
(925,478
|
)
|
(1,310,269
|
)
|
|||||
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities
|
523,635
|
|
498,371
|
|
568,447
|
|
|||||
|
Maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
289,197
|
|
400,379
|
|
492,444
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash paid for acquisitions
|
(523,501
|
)
|
(83,156
|
)
|
(58,302
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from (purchases of) strategic investments
|
95,580
|
|
40,881
|
|
(13,769
|
)
|
|||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(79,215
|
)
|
(68,781
|
)
|
(77,800
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cash paid for intangible assets
|
(11,344
|
)
|
(12,228
|
)
|
(1,750
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(69,649
|
)
|
(150,012
|
)
|
(400,999
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Payments on current portion of long-term financing obligations
|
(10,852
|
)
|
—
|
|
(349,874
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payments on acquisition related contingent consideration liability
|
(3,985
|
)
|
(3,374
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
903,492
|
|
|||||
|
Incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation
|
56,678
|
|
20,783
|
|
46,354
|
|
|||||
|
Common stock repurchases
|
(50,020
|
)
|
(82,522
|
)
|
(570,406
|
)
|
|||||
|
(Payments for) proceeds from warrant settlements
|
(125,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
5,512
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
94,460
|
|
54,358
|
|
61,938
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(38,719
|
)
|
(10,755
|
)
|
97,016
|
|
|||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(397
|
)
|
(103
|
)
|
(126
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
277,656
|
|
131,003
|
|
54,031
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
433,981
|
|
302,978
|
|
248,947
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
711,637
|
|
$
|
433,981
|
|
$
|
302,978
|
|
||
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$
|
50,086
|
|
$
|
74,037
|
|
$
|
9,806
|
|
||
|
Unsettled short-term investments purchase
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
9,154
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
50
ILLUMINA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “Illumina,” “we,” “us,” the “Company,” and “our” refer to Illumina, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
|
1.
|
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization and Business
Illumina, Inc. is a leading developer, manufacturer, and marketer of life science tools and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variation and function. Using its proprietary technologies, Illumina provides innovative sequencing- and array-based solutions for genotyping, copy-number variation analysis, methylation studies, and gene expression profiling of DNA and RNA. The Company’s customers include leading genomic research centers, academic institutions, government laboratories, hospitals, and reference laboratories, as well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, commercial molecular diagnostic, and consumer genomics companies.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Fiscal Year
The Company’s fiscal year is 52 or 53 weeks ending the Sunday closest to December 31, with quarters of 13 or 14 weeks ending the Sunday closest to March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31. Each of the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
were
52
weeks.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Segment Information
For fiscal year 2013 and prior, the Company was organized in
two
operating segments for purposes of recording and reporting its financial results: Life Sciences and Diagnostics. The Life Sciences operating segment included all products and services related to the research market, namely the product lines based on the Company’s sequencing, BeadArray, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technologies. The Diagnostics operating segment focused on the clinical and personalized application of the Company’s products and services for such uses as diagnosing disease, identifying genetic abnormalities, and identifying effective treatment therapies, with an initial emphasis on reproductive health and cancer. During all periods presented, the Diagnostics operating segment was immaterial to the financial statements as a whole. Accordingly, the financial results for both operating segments have been reported on an aggregate basis as
one
reportable segment.
In late 2013, the Company announced organizational changes effective December 30, 2013 for the primary purpose of achieving scalability in business operations to support the growth in its strategic markets. The Company separated the roles of the Chief Executive Officer and the President, with core market and operational functions centralized and reporting to the President. Corporate functions and the President report to the CEO. As a result, the Company began operations as
one
operating segment as of December 30, 2013, and will continue to report under
one
reportable segment.
Concentrations of Risk
The Company operates in markets that are highly competitive and rapidly changing. Significant technological changes, shifting customer needs, the emergence of competitive products or services with new capabilities, and other factors could negatively impact the Company’s operating results. A significant portion of the Company’s customers consist of university and research institutions that management believes are, to some degree, directly or indirectly supported by the United States
51
Government. A significant change in current research funding, particularly with respect to the National Institutes of Health, could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s future revenues and results of operations.
The Company is also subject to risks related to its financial instruments including its cash and cash equivalents, investments, and accounts receivable. Most of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of
December 29, 2013
were deposited with U.S. financial institutions, either domestically or with their foreign branches. The Company’s investment policy restricts the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer to
5%
of the portfolio at the time of purchase and to any one industry sector, as defined by Bloomberg classifications, to
25%
of the portfolio at the time of purchase. There is no limit to the percentage of the portfolio that may be maintained in U.S. Treasury securities, debt securities in U.S. government-sponsored entities, and money market funds.
The Company’s products require customized products and components that currently are available from a limited number of sources. The Company sources certain key products and components included in its products from single vendors.
The Company performs a regular review of customer activity and associated credit risks and does not require collateral or enter into netting arrangements. Shipments to customers outside the United States comprised
50%
,
51%
, and
50%
of the Company’s revenue for the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, respectively. Customers outside the United States represented
52%
and
54%
of the Company’s gross trade accounts receivable balance as of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, respectively.
International sales entail a variety of risks, including currency exchange fluctuations, longer payment cycles, and greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection. The Company is also subject to general geopolitical risks, such as political, social and economic instability, and changes in diplomatic and trade relations. The risks of international sales are mitigated in part by the extent to which sales are geographically distributed. The Company has historically not experienced significant credit losses from investments and accounts receivable. Approximately
18%
of the Company’s revenue is derived from European countries other than the United Kingdom. As the credit and economic conditions in certain southern European countries continue to deteriorate, the Company regularly reviews its outstanding accounts receivables in these countries and assesses the allowance for doubtful accounts accordingly. As of
December 29, 2013
, outstanding accounts receivables beyond standard payment terms from these countries accounted for less than
5%
of the Company’s accounts receivable balance, and the Company has not experienced significant difficulties in collecting the accounts receivable outstanding in these countries.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company determines the fair value of its assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy with three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, to measure fair value:
|
•
|
Level 1 —
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 —
Inputs, other than Level 1, that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 —
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
The carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities, excluding acquisition related contingent consideration liabilities, approximate the related fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Functional Currency
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency of the Company’s international operations. The Company remeasures its foreign subsidiaries’ monetary assets and liabilities to the U.S. dollar and records the net gains or losses resulting from remeasurement in other expense, net in the consolidated statements of income.
52
Acquisitions
The Company measures all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including contingent considerations and all contractual contingencies, at fair value as of the acquisition date. Contingent purchase considerations to be settled in cash are remeasured to estimated fair value at each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded in acquisition related (gain) expense, net, a component of operating expenses. In addition, the Company capitalizes in-process research and development (IPR&D) and either amortizes it over the life of the product upon commercialization, or impairs it if the project is abandoned. Post-acquisition adjustments in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and liabilities for uncertain tax positions are recorded in current period income tax expense.
Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
Cash equivalents are comprised of short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of
90 days
or less at the date of purchase.
Short-term investments consist of U.S. Treasury securities, debt securities in U.S. government-sponsored entities, and corporate debt securities. Management classifies short-term investments as available-for-sale at the time of purchase and evaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date. All short-term investments are recorded at estimated fair value. Unrealized gains and losses for available-for-sale securities are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity. The Company evaluates its investments to assess whether those with unrealized loss positions are other than temporarily impaired. Impairments are considered to be other than temporary if they are related to deterioration in credit risk or if it is likely that the Company will sell the securities before the recovery of their cost basis. Realized gains, losses, and declines in value judged to be other than temporary are determined based on the specific identification method and are reported in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income.
Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the net invoice value and are not interest bearing. The Company considers receivables past due based on the contractual payment terms. The Company reserves specific receivables if collectibility is no longer reasonably assured. The Company also reserves a percentage of its trade receivable balance based on collection history and current economic trends that might impact the level of future credit losses. The Company re-evaluates such reserves on a regular basis and adjusts its reserves as needed. Once a receivable is deemed to be uncollectible, such balance is charged against the reserve.
Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, on a first in, first out basis. Inventory includes raw materials and finished goods that may be used in the research and development process and such items are expensed as consumed or expired. Provisions for slow moving, excess, and obsolete inventories are estimated based on product life cycles, quality issues, historical experience, and usage forecasts.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, subject to review of impairment, and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally range from
three
to
seven years
, using the straight-line method. Amortization of leasehold improvements is recorded over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the related assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. When assets are sold, or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operating expense.
Leases
Leases are reviewed and classified as capital or operating at their inception. The Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, which includes the construction build-out period and lease extension periods, if appropriate. The difference between rent payments and straight-line rent expense is recorded as deferred rent in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities. Landlord allowances are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term as a reduction to rent expense. The Company capitalizes leasehold improvements and amortizes the value over the shorter of the lease term or expected useful lives.
53
Headquarter relocation expenses consisted of expenses such as accelerated depreciation expense, impairment of assets, additional rent expense during the transition period when both the new and former headquarter facilities were occupied, moving expenses, cease-use losses, and accretion of interest expense on lease exit liability.
In 2012, the Company completed the relocation of its headquarters to another facility in San Diego, California. The Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense for leasehold improvements at its former headquarter facility based on the reassessed useful lives of less than a year. The Company recorded cease-use losses and the corresponding facility exit obligation upon vacating its former headquarters, calculated as the present value of the remaining lease obligation offset by estimated sublease rental receipts during the remaining lease period, adjusted for deferred items and estimated lease incentives. The key assumptions used in the calculation include the amount and timing of estimated sublease rental receipts, and the risk-adjusted discount rate.
Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill, which has an indefinite useful life, represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired. The change in the carrying value of goodwill during the year ended
December 29, 2013
was due to goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually during the second quarter, or more frequently if an event occurs indicating the potential for impairment. During its goodwill impairment review, the Company may assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of its reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. The qualitative factors include, but are not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, and the overall financial performance of the Company. If, after assessing the totality of these qualitative factors, the Company determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of its reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then no additional assessment is deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Company proceeds to perform the two-step test for goodwill impairment. The first step involves comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of loss, which involves comparing the implied fair value of the goodwill to the carrying value of the goodwill. The Company may also elect to bypass the qualitative assessment in a period and elect to proceed to perform the first step of the goodwill impairment test. The Company performed its annual assessment for goodwill impairment in the second quarter of
2013
, noting
no
impairment.
IPR&D, which also has an indefinite useful life, is reviewed for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if an event occurs indicating the potential for impairment. The IPR&D impairment test requires the Company to assess the fair value of the asset as compared to its carrying value and record an impairment charge if the carrying value exceeds the fair value. During the second fiscal quarter of 2012, the Company recorded
$21.4 million
in impairment charges of IPR&D within research and development expenses in the consolidated statements of income, when resources previously assigned to the research project were re-directed with no plans for additional investments to be made to the project in the foreseeable future.
The Company’s identifiable intangible assets are typically comprised of acquired core technologies, licensed technologies, customer relationships, and trade names. The cost of identifiable intangible assets with finite lives is generally amortized on a straight-line basis over the assets’ respective estimated useful lives.
The Company regularly performs reviews to determine if any event has occurred that may indicate its intangible assets with finite useful lives and other long-lived assets are potentially impaired. If indicators of impairment exist, the Company performs an impairment test to assess the recoverability of the affected assets by determining whether the carrying amount of such assets exceeds the undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the affected assets are not recoverable, the Company estimates the fair value of the assets and records an impairment loss if the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value. Factors that may indicate potential impairment include a significant decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization compared to its net book value, significant changes in the ability of a particular asset to generate positive cash flows the Company’s strategic business objectives, and the pattern of utilization of a particular asset.
During 2013, the Company decided to discontinue its Eco and NuPCR product lines to better align its product portfolio with its core strategy. As a result, the Company recorded a total impairment charge of
$25.2 million
in cost of product revenue,
$22.9 million
of which related to identifiable intangible assets, including developed technology and license agreements.
54
Derivatives
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange rate risks in the normal course of business. To manage a portion of the accounting exposure resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company enters into foreign exchange contracts to hedge monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. These foreign exchange contracts are carried at fair value and are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the value of the derivatives are recognized in other expense, net, along with an offsetting remeasurement gain or loss on the underlying foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities.
As of
December 29, 2013
, the Company had foreign exchange forward contracts in place to hedge exposures in the euro, Japanese yen, and Australian dollar. As of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, the total notional amount of outstanding forward contracts in place for foreign currency purchases was
$54.7 million
and
$51.2 million
, respectively. Non-designated foreign exchange forward contract related gain was
$3.5 million
for the year ended December 29, 2013 and immaterial for the years ended December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012.
Reserve for Product Warranties
The Company generally provides a
one
-year warranty on instruments. Additionally, the Company provides a warranty on its consumables through the expiration date, which generally ranges from
six
to
twelve
months after the manufacture date. At the time revenue is recognized, the Company establishes an accrual for estimated warranty expenses based on historical experience as well as anticipated product performance. The Company periodically reviews the adequacy of its warranty reserve and adjusts the warranty accrual, if necessary, based on actual experience and estimated costs to be incurred. Warranty expense is recorded as a component of cost of product revenue.
Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenue is generated primarily from the sale of products and services. Product revenue primarily consists of sales of instruments and consumables used in genetic analysis. Service and other revenue primarily consists of revenue generated from genotyping and sequencing services and instrument service contracts.
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product or system is required, revenue is deferred until all the acceptance criteria have been met. All revenue is recorded net of discounts.
Revenue from product sales is recognized generally upon transfer of title to the customer, provided that no significant obligations remain and collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. Revenue from instrument service contracts is recognized as the services are rendered, typically evenly over the contract term. Revenue from genotyping and sequencing services is recognized when earned, which is generally at the time the genotyping or sequencing analysis data is made available to the customer or agreed upon milestones are reached.
In order to assess whether the price is fixed or determinable, the Company evaluates whether refund rights exist. If there are refund rights or payment terms based on future performance, the Company defers revenue recognition until the price becomes fixed or determinable. The Company assesses collectibility based on a number of factors, including past transaction history and the creditworthiness of the customer. If the Company determines that collection of a payment is not reasonably assured, revenue recognition is deferred until receipt of payment.
The Company regularly enters into contracts where revenue is derived from multiple deliverables including products or services. These products or services are generally delivered within a short time frame, approximately
three
to
six months
, after the contract execution date. Revenue recognition for contracts with multiple deliverables is based on the individual units of accounting determined to exist in the contract. A delivered item is considered a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Items are considered to have stand-alone value when they are sold separately by any vendor or when the customer could resell the item on a stand-alone basis. Consideration is allocated at the inception of the contract to all deliverables based on their relative selling price. The relative selling price for each deliverable is determined using vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of selling price or third-party evidence of selling price if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor third-party evidence exists, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for the deliverable.
55
In order to establish VSOE of selling price, the Company must regularly sell the product or service on a standalone basis with a substantial majority priced within a relatively narrow range. VSOE of selling price is usually the midpoint of that range. If there are not a sufficient number of standalone sales and VSOE of selling price cannot be determined, then the Company considers whether third party evidence can be used to establish selling price. Due to the lack of similar products and services sold by other companies within the industry, the Company has rarely established selling price using third-party evidence. If neither VSOE nor third party evidence of selling price exists, the Company determines its best estimate of selling price using average selling prices over a rolling 12-month period coupled with an assessment of current market conditions. If the product or service has no history of sales or if the sales volume is not sufficient, the Company relies upon prices set by the Company’s pricing committee adjusted for applicable discounts. The Company recognizes revenue for delivered elements only when it determines there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
During the fiscal year ended January 1, 2012, the Company completed its Genome Analyzer trade-in program that enabled certain Genome Analyzer customers to trade in their Genome Analyzer and receive a discount on the purchase of a HiSeq 2000. The incentive was limited to customers who had purchased a Genome Analyzer prior to the beginning of the incentive program in early 2010 and was the only significant trade-in program offered by the Company. The Company accounted for HiSeq 2000 discounts related to the Genome Analyzer trade-in program as reductions to revenue upon recognition of the HiSeq 2000 sales revenue, which is later than the date the trade-in program was launched.
In certain markets, the Company sells products and provides services to customers through distributors that specialize in life science products. In most sales through distributors, the product is delivered directly to customers. In cases where the product is delivered to a distributor, revenue recognition is deferred until acceptance is received from the distributor, and/or the end-user, if required by the applicable sales contract. The terms of sales transactions through distributors are consistent with the terms of direct sales to customers. These transactions are accounted for in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy described herein.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted and stock purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). This model incorporates various assumptions including expected volatility, expected term of an award, expected dividends, and the risk-free interest rates. The Company determines the expected volatility by equally weighing the historical and implied volatility of the Company’s common stock. The historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period is generally commensurate with the estimated expected term of the Company’s stock awards, adjusted for the impact of unusual fluctuations not reasonably expected to recur and other relevant factors. The implied volatility is calculated from the implied market volatility of exchange-traded call options on the Company’s common stock. The expected term of an award is based on historical forfeiture experience, exercise activity, and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards. The expected dividend yield is determined to be
0%
given that the Company has never declared or paid cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying such cash dividends. The risk-free interest rate is based upon U.S. Treasury securities with remaining terms similar to the expected term of the share-based awards. The fair value of restricted stock units granted is based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company recognizes the fair value of share-based compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards.
Shipping and Handling Expenses
Shipping and handling expenses are included in cost of product revenue.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include personnel expenses, contractor fees, license fees, facilities costs, and utilities. Expenditures relating to research and development are expensed in the period incurred.
Advertising Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs were
$14.5 million
,
$10.5 million
, and
$9.4 million
for the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, respectively.
56
Restructuring Charges
During the year ended January 1, 2012, the Company announced and executed a restructuring plan to reduce the Company’s workforce and to consolidate certain facilities. The Company measured and accrued the liabilities associated with employee separation costs at fair value as of the date the plan was announced and terminations were communicated to employees, which primarily consisted of severance pay and other separation costs such as outplacement services and benefits.
The fair value measurement of restructuring related liabilities requires certain assumptions and estimates to be made by the Company, such as the retention period of certain employees, the timing and amount of sublease income on properties to be vacated, and the operating costs to be paid until lease termination. It is the Company’s policy to use the best estimates based on facts and circumstances available at the time of measurement, review the assumptions and estimates periodically, and adjust the liabilities when necessary.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined using the enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the provision for income taxes in the period that includes the enactment date.
Deferred tax assets are regularly assessed to determine the likelihood they will be recovered from future taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when the Company believes it is more likely than not the future realization of all or some of a deferred tax asset will not be achieved. In evaluating the ability to recover deferred tax assets within the jurisdiction which they arise the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence. Factors reviewed include the cumulative pre-tax book income for the past three years, scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, history of earnings and reliable forecasting, projections of pre-tax book income over the foreseeable future, and the impact of any feasible and prudent tax planning strategies.
The Company recognizes excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation to stockholders’ equity only when realized. When assessing whether excess tax benefits relating to share-based compensation have been realized, the Company follows the with-and-without approach excluding any indirect effects of the excess tax deductions. Under this approach, excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation are not deemed to be realized until after the utilization of all other tax benefits available to the Company.
The Company recognizes the impact of a tax position in the financial statements only if that position is more likely than not of being sustained upon examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. Any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be reflected in income tax expense.
Net Income per Share
Basic net income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed based on the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period.
Dilutive potential common shares consist of shares issuable under convertible senior notes, equity awards, and warrants. Convertible senior notes have a dilutive impact when the average market price of the Company’s common stock exceeds the applicable conversion price of the respective notes. Potentially dilutive common shares from equity awards and warrants are determined using the average share price for each period under the treasury stock method. In addition, the following amounts are assumed to be used to repurchase shares: proceeds from exercise of equity awards and warrants; the average amount of unrecognized compensation expense for equity awards; and estimated tax benefits that will be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the expenses related to equity awards become deductible. In loss periods, basic net loss per share and diluted net loss per share are identical because the otherwise dilutive potential common shares become anti-dilutive and therefore excluded.
57
The following table presents the calculation of weighted average number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended
|
|||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
125,076
|
|
122,999
|
|
123,399
|
|
||
|
Effect of dilutive potential common shares from:
|
||||||||
|
Convertible senior notes
|
1,340
|
|
967
|
|
3,783
|
|
||
|
Equity awards
|
4,404
|
|
3,906
|
|
4,703
|
|
||
|
Warrants
|
9,116
|
|
5,821
|
|
7,052
|
|
||
|
Weighted average shares used in calculating diluted net income per share
|
139,936
|
|
133,693
|
|
138,937
|
|
||
|
Potentially dilutive shares excluded from calculation due to anti-dilutive effect
|
996
|
|
2,556
|
|
2,418
|
|
||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other comprehensive income. Accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheets at
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
includes accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on the Company’s available-for-sale securities.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
$
|
1,289
|
|
$
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax
|
(55
|
)
|
834
|
|
|||
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
$
|
1,234
|
|
$
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Balance Sheet Account Details
|
Short-Term Investments
The following is a summary of short-term investments (in thousands):
|
|
December 29, 2013
|
December 30, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Debt securities in government-sponsored entities
|
$
|
82,226
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
$
|
82,143
|
|
$
|
314,638
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
314,873
|
|
|||||||
|
Corporate debt securities
|
342,034
|
|
312
|
|
(376
|
)
|
341,970
|
|
471,989
|
|
1,059
|
|
(187
|
)
|
472,861
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
29,795
|
|
58
|
|
—
|
|
29,853
|
|
128,256
|
|
233
|
|
—
|
|
128,489
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
$
|
454,055
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
$
|
(477
|
)
|
$
|
453,966
|
|
$
|
914,883
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
$
|
(203
|
)
|
$
|
916,223
|
|
|||||||
58
As of
December 29, 2013
, the Company had
111
available-for-sale securities in a gross unrealized loss position which had been in such position for less than twelve months. There were no impairments considered other-than-temporary as it is more likely than not the Company will hold the securities until maturity or the recovery of the cost basis. The following table shows the estimated fair values and the gross unrealized losses of the Company’s available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months as of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, respectively, aggregated by investment category (in thousands):
|
|
December 29, 2013
|
December 30, 2012
|
|||||||||||||
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||||||||||
|
Debt securities in government-sponsored entities
|
$
|
73,362
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
$
|
28,176
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|||
|
Corporate debt securities
|
168,118
|
|
(373
|
)
|
130,224
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
241,480
|
|
$
|
(474
|
)
|
$
|
158,400
|
|
$
|
(203
|
)
|
|||
Realized gains and losses are determined based on the specific identification method and are reported in interest income. To conform to the current year classification, the Company reclassified in the consolidated statements of cash flows,
$235.0 million
and
$332.4 million
of callable bonds redeemed prior to maturity from sales to maturities of available-for-sale securities for the years ended
December 30, 2012
and
January 1, 2012
, respectively.
Contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities as of
December 29, 2013
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
||
|
Due within one year
|
$
|
127,081
|
|
|
After one but within five years
|
326,885
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
453,966
|
|
Cost-Method Investments
As of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, the aggregate carrying amounts of the Company’s cost-method investments in non-publicly traded companies were
$22.1 million
and
$56.3 million
, respectively, which were included in other assets. The Company’s cost-method investments are assessed for impairment quarterly. The Company does not estimate the fair value of cost-method investments if there are no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investments.
During the year ended
December 29, 2013
, the Company recorded cost-method investment related gains of
$61.4 million
, of which
$55.2 million
related to the sale of the Company’s minority interest in Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. During the year ended December 30, 2012, the Company recorded
$48.6 million
in a gain from the sale of its minority ownership interest in deCODE Genetics, Inc. and
$6.0 million
in interest income from the recovery of a previously impaired loan from an investee.
No impairment losses were recorded during the years ended
December 29, 2013
and January 1, 2012. During the year ended December 30, 2012, the Company determined that a cost-method investment was other-than-temporarily impaired and recorded an impairment loss of
$2.7 million
. This determination was based upon operational performance trends coupled with uncertainty regarding the entity’s ability to obtain additional funding in a required timeframe for the entity to continue operations.
59
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist of the following (in thousands):
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
||||||
|
Accounts receivable from product and service sales
|
$
|
241,360
|
|
$
|
217,369
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
1,266
|
|
1,886
|
|
|||
|
Total accounts receivable, gross
|
242,626
|
|
219,255
|
|
|||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(3,680
|
)
|
(4,280
|
)
|
|||
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
$
|
238,946
|
|
$
|
214,975
|
|
|
Inventory
Inventory consists of the following (in thousands):
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
||||||
|
Raw materials
|
$
|
57,398
|
|
$
|
61,665
|
|
|
|
Work in process
|
70,016
|
|
75,675
|
|
|||
|
Finished goods
|
26,685
|
|
21,378
|
|
|||
|
Total inventory
|
$
|
154,099
|
|
$
|
158,718
|
|
|
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net consists of the following (in thousands):
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
||||||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
$
|
104,571
|
|
$
|
87,734
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
175,340
|
|
158,112
|
|
|||
|
Computer hardware and software
|
73,544
|
|
58,313
|
|
|||
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
10,511
|
|
8,022
|
|
|||
|
Building
|
7,670
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Construction in progress
|
8,531
|
|
7,390
|
|
|||
|
Total property and equipment, gross
|
380,167
|
|
319,571
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(177,501
|
)
|
(153,404
|
)
|
|||
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
$
|
202,666
|
|
$
|
166,167
|
|
|
Capital expenditures included accrued expenditures of
$5.9 million
for the year ended
January 1, 2012
. This amount has been excluded from the consolidated statements of cash flows. Accrued capital expenditures were immaterial for the years ended
December 29, 2013
, and
December 30, 2012
.
Restructuring
In late 2011, the Company implemented a cost reduction initiative that included workforce reductions and the consolidation of certain facilities. In total, the Company notified approximately
200
employees of their involuntary termination. Restructuring activities were completed during the year ended December 30, 2012.
60
A summary of the pre-tax charges and total costs associated with the initiative is as follows (in thousands):
|
Employee Separation costs
|
Facilities Exit Costs
|
Other Costs
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
Amount recorded in accrued liabilities as of January 1, 2012
|
$
|
3,496
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
$
|
3,526
|
|
|||
|
Additional expenses
|
2,780
|
|
221
|
|
521
|
|
3,522
|
|
|||||||
|
Cash payments
|
(6,276
|
)
|
(221
|
)
|
(551
|
)
|
(7,048
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Amount recorded in accrued liabilities as of December 30, 2012
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Cumulative expense recorded since inception in restructuring expense
|
$
|
10,463
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
$
|
974
|
|
$
|
11,658
|
|
|||
Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
||||||
|
Accrued compensation expenses
|
$
|
82,705
|
|
$
|
59,864
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue, current portion
|
50,834
|
|
55,817
|
|
|||
|
Accrued taxes payable
|
30,435
|
|
23,021
|
|
|||
|
Customer deposits
|
13,569
|
|
13,765
|
|
|||
|
Reserve for product warranties
|
10,407
|
|
10,136
|
|
|||
|
Acquisition related contingent consideration liability, current portion
|
6,719
|
|
9,490
|
|
|||
|
Facility exit obligation, current portion
|
5,570
|
|
8,063
|
|
|||
|
Unsettled short-term investment purchase
|
—
|
|
9,154
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
18,881
|
|
12,567
|
|
|||
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
$
|
219,120
|
|
$
|
201,877
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Acquisitions
|
Current Year Acquisitions
On February 21, 2013, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Verinata Health, Inc., a provider of non-invasive tests for the early identification of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. With this acquisition, the Company strengthened its reproductive health product portfolio by gaining access to Verinata’s verifi® non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) as well as what management believes to be the most comprehensive intellectual property portfolio in the NIPT industry.
The contractual price for the acquisition was
$350.0 million
, plus potential cash payments of up to
$100.0 million
based on the achievement of certain regulatory and revenue milestones. The aggregate purchase price was determined to be
$396.3 million
, including total cash payment of
$339.3 million
,
$56.2 million
in fair value of the contingent milestone payments,
$0.2 million
in fair value of converted stock options attributed to pre-combination services, and
$0.5 million
in loss realized on settlement of preexisting relationships. In connection with the transaction, the Company deposited into escrow
$30.0 million
of consideration otherwise payable to shareholders of Verinata. This amount is included in the aggregate consideration and will be held in escrow to cover indemnification claims under the acquisition agreement, if any, for a period of
1.5 years
following the completion of the acquisition. As of
December 29, 2013
, transaction costs of
$3.4 million
were expensed as incurred in acquisition related (gain) expense, net.
In conjunction with the acquisition, the Company assumed the Verinata Health, Inc. 2008 Stock Plan and converted, as of the acquisition date, the unvested stock options outstanding under the plan, all of which were in the money, into
0.4 million
unvested stock options to purchase Illumina’s common stock, retaining the original vesting schedules. The fair value of all converted options was
$18.9 million
,
$0.2 million
of which was attributed to the pre-combination service period and was included in the calculation of purchase price. The remaining fair value will be recognized over the awards’ remaining vesting periods subsequent to the acquisition. The weighted-average acquisition-date fair value of the converted options was
61
determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) market price of
$48.36
per share, which was the closing price of Illumina’s common stock on the acquisition date; (ii) weighted average expected term of
2.3 years
; (iii) weighted average risk-free interest rate of
0.32%
; (iv) weighted average annualized volatility of
42%
; and (v)
no
dividend yield. The weighted average acquisition-date fair value per share of the assumed stock options was
$42.63
.
An initial liability of
$56.2 million
was recorded for an estimate of the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration. Any change in the fair value of the contingent milestone consideration subsequent to the acquisition date was and will be recognized in the consolidated statement of income. The fair value of the regulatory milestone payments was measured by the probability-weighted discounted cash flows and the fair value of the revenue milestone payments was measured using a risk-neutral option pricing model, which captures the present value of the expected payment and the probability of reaching the revenue targets. Key assumptions used in the fair value assessments included discount rates ranging from
6%
to
20%
, volatility of
50%
, risk-free rates of
0.26%
, revenue projections, and the probability of achieving regulatory milestones. This fair value measurement of the contingent consideration is based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the Company’s own assumptions in measuring fair value.
As of
December 29, 2013
, the allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition date was as follows (in thousands):
|
Allocation of purchase price
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
9,151
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
2,801
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
979
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
12,083
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
978
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
176,490
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
227,453
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
(2,539
|
)
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
(3,803
|
)
|
|
|
Lease financing obligation
|
(9,695
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
(18,741
|
)
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
396,267
|
|
In conjunction with the acquisition, the Company assumed Verinata’s building lease, for which Verinata was considered the accounting owner of the leased building and as such, recorded the fair value of the building as an asset as of the acquisition date. The building is depreciated over a useful life of
30 years
. The Company also recorded the related lease financing obligation as a liability assumed, representing the present value of all remaining building lease payments with an interest rate of
6.0%
. The annual future minimum payments, including the balloon payment at the end of the lease for the value of the building to be transferred to the landlord, are
$0.9 million
for each of the years of 2014, 2015, and 2016, and
$8.3 million
for 2017.
The following table summarizes the fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired (amounts in thousands):
|
Weighted Average Useful Lives (in years)
|
Fair Value
|
||||
|
Developed technology
|
13
|
$
|
170,200
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
5
|
4,690
|
|
||
|
Trade name
|
2
|
1,600
|
|
||
|
Total intangible assets acquired, excluding goodwill
|
$
|
176,490
|
|
||
62
The fair value of the developed technology and trade name was estimated using an income approach. Under the income approach, an intangible asset’s fair value is equal to the present value of future economic benefits to be derived from ownership of the asset. The estimated fair value was developed by discounting future net cash flows to their present value at market-based rates of return. The fair value of the customer relationships was developed using a cost approach by estimating the time and personnel effort in constructing the customer base. The useful life of the intangible assets for amortization purposes was determined by considering the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the intangible assets adjusted as appropriate for the entity-specific factors including legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other factors that may limit the useful life of intangible assets.
The excess of the fair value of the total consideration over the estimated fair value of the net assets was recorded as goodwill, which was primarily attributable to the synergies expected from combining the technologies of Illumina with those of Verinata, including complementary products that will enhance the Company’s overall product portfolio, and the value of the workforce that became our employees following the closing of the acquisitions. The goodwill recognized is not deductible for income tax purposes.
During 2013, the Company also completed acquisitions of Advanced Liquid Logic Inc., a provider of liquid handling solutions, NextBio, a provider of clinical and genomic informatics tools, and another development-stage company. As a result of these transactions, the Company recorded developed technologies of
$79.7 million
with a weighted average useful life of
eight years
and goodwill of
$126.3 million
. The purchase price allocation for the NextBio acquisition is preliminary and subject to change as more detailed analyses are completed and additional information with respect to the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired becomes available.
Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of the Company as if the acquisitions completed during the year ended December 29, 2013 had occurred at the beginning of the applicable annual reporting period, with pro forma adjustments to give effect to intercompany transactions to be eliminated, amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation, and transaction costs directly associated with the acquisitions (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
Years Ended
|
|||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
1,433,935
|
|
$
|
1,161,241
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
113,869
|
|
$
|
92,645
|
|
|
|
Net income per share-basic
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
Net income per share-diluted
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
These unaudited pro forma consolidated financial results have been prepared for illustrative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that actually would have resulted had the acquisition occurred on the first day of the earliest period presented, or of the future results of the consolidated entities. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information does not reflect any operating efficiencies and cost savings that may be realized from the integration of the acquisition.
Prior Year Acquisitions
On September 19, 2012, the Company announced the acquisition of BlueGnome Ltd. (BlueGnome), a provider of cytogenetics and in vitro fertilization screening products. Total consideration for the acquisition was
$95.5 million
, which included
$88.0 million
in initial cash payments and
$7.5 million
in fair value of contingent cash consideration of up to
$20.0 million
based on the achievement of certain revenue based milestones by December 28, 2014.
The Company estimated the fair value of contingent cash consideration using a probability weighted discounted cash flow approach, a Level 3 measurement, using a discount rate of
30%
. The Company also agreed to pay up to
$20.0 million
to BlueGnome shareholders contingent upon the retention of certain key employees and certain other criteria. Such contingent payments are recognized as contingent compensation expense over the retention period through December 28, 2014.
63
As a result of this acquisition, the Company recorded developed technologies of
$25.0 million
, customer relationships of
$16.8 million
, and a trade name of
$7.1 million
with average useful lives of
seven
,
five
, and
ten years
, respectively. The Company recorded the excess consideration of approximately
$47.5 million
as goodwill.
On
January 10, 2011
, the Company acquired Epicentre Technologies Corporation (Epicentre), a provider of nucleic acid sample preparation reagents and specialty enzymes used in sequencing and microarray applications. Total consideration for the acquisition was
$71.4 million
, which included
$59.4 million
in net cash payments,
$4.6 million
in the fair value of contingent consideration settled in stock that is subject to forfeiture if certain non-revenue based milestones are not met, and
$7.4 million
in the fair value of contingent cash consideration of up to
$15.0 million
based on the achievement of certain revenue based milestones by
January 10, 2013
.
The Company estimated the fair value of contingent stock consideration based on the closing price of its common stock as of the acquisition date. Approximately
229,000
shares of common stock were issued to Epicentre shareholders in connection with the acquisition, which shares are subject to forfeiture if certain non-revenue-based milestones are not met.
The Company estimated the fair value of contingent cash consideration using a probability weighted discounted cash flow approach, a Level 3 measurement, using a discount rate of
21%
and estimated the fair value of contingent stock consideration based on the closing price of its common stock as of the acquisition date.
One third
of these shares issued with an assessed fair value of
$4.6 million
were recorded as purchase price and the remaining shares were recorded as compensation costs for post-acquisition service.
The Company allocated
$0.9 million
of the total consideration to tangible assets, net of liabilities, and
$26.9 million
to identified intangible assets, including additional developed technologies of
$23.3 million
, a trade name of
$2.5 million
, and customer relationships of
$1.1 million
, with weighted average useful lives of approximately
nine
,
ten
, and
three years
, respectively. The Company recorded the excess consideration of
$43.6 million
as goodwill.
In addition, the Company agreed to pay the former shareholders of another development stage company acquired in 2008 a certain amount of contingent cash consideration based on the achievement of certain product-related and employment-related milestones. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance effective at the time, such consideration was accounted for as additional elements of the cost of acquisition, resulting in additional IPR&D charges in the years ended January 1, 2012 and January 2, 2011 when the contingencies were resolved beyond a reasonable doubt and the considerations were issued or became issuable.
Summary of Contingent Compensation Expenses and IPR&D Charges
Contingent compensation expenses and IPR&D charges as a result of acquisitions consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Contingent compensation expense, included in research and development expense
|
$
|
544
|
|
$
|
3,419
|
|
$
|
4,799
|
|
||
|
Contingent compensation expense, included in selling, general and administrative expense
|
13,066
|
|
5,732
|
|
1,258
|
|
|||||
|
Total contingent compensation expense
|
$
|
13,610
|
|
$
|
9,151
|
|
$
|
6,057
|
|
||
|
IPR&D, included in acquisition related expense (gain), net
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
5,425
|
|
||
|
4.
|
Intangible Assets
|
The Company’s intangible assets, excluding goodwill, include acquired core and licensed technologies, license agreements, trade name, and customer relationships. Amortization for the intangible assets that have finite useful lives is generally recorded on a straight-line basis over their useful lives.
The following is a summary of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets as of the respective balance sheet dates (in thousands):
64
|
|
December 29, 2013
|
December 30, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Intangibles,
Net
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Intangibles,
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Licensed technologies
|
$
|
48,361
|
|
$
|
(31,927
|
)
|
$
|
16,434
|
|
$
|
47,329
|
|
$
|
(25,471
|
)
|
$
|
21,858
|
|
|||||
|
Core technologies
|
321,700
|
|
(45,534
|
)
|
276,166
|
|
99,800
|
|
(27,427
|
)
|
72,373
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Customer relationships
|
26,770
|
|
(7,376
|
)
|
19,394
|
|
18,780
|
|
(2,214
|
)
|
16,566
|
|
|||||||||||
|
License agreements
|
18,917
|
|
(4,947
|
)
|
13,970
|
|
14,404
|
|
(3,933
|
)
|
10,471
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Trade name
|
11,800
|
|
(6,591
|
)
|
5,209
|
|
9,600
|
|
(672
|
)
|
8,928
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
$
|
427,548
|
|
$
|
(96,375
|
)
|
$
|
331,173
|
|
$
|
189,913
|
|
$
|
(59,717
|
)
|
$
|
130,196
|
|
|||||
Additions to intangible assets during the year ended
December 29, 2013
were primarily due to acquisitions during the year. The components of such intangibles assets acquired are as follows (in thousands):
|
Weighted Average
Useful Lives
(years)
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
||||
|
Core technologies
|
12
|
$
|
249,900
|
|
|
|
License agreements
|
10
|
10,013
|
|
||
|
Customer relationships
|
4
|
7,990
|
|
||
|
Trade name
|
2
|
2,200
|
|
||
|
Licensed technologies
|
5
|
1,032
|
|
||
|
Total intangible asset additions
|
$
|
271,135
|
|
||
The estimated annual amortization of intangible assets for the next five years is shown in the following table (in thousands). Actual amortization expense to be reported in future periods could differ from these estimates as a result of acquisitions, divestitures, asset impairments, among other factors.
|
Estimated Annual Amortization
|
|||
|
2014
|
$
|
49,376
|
|
|
2015
|
45,974
|
|
|
|
2016
|
40,582
|
|
|
|
2017
|
36,106
|
|
|
|
2018
|
27,310
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
131,825
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
331,173
|
|
65
|
5.
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
The following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, respectively (in thousands):
|
December 29, 2013
|
December 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Money market funds (cash equivalent)
|
$
|
478,755
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
478,755
|
|
$
|
252,126
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
252,126
|
|
|||||||
|
Debt securities in government-sponsored entities
|
—
|
|
82,143
|
|
—
|
|
82,143
|
|
—
|
|
314,873
|
|
—
|
|
314,873
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Corporate debt securities
|
—
|
|
341,970
|
|
—
|
|
341,970
|
|
—
|
|
472,861
|
|
—
|
|
472,861
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
29,853
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
29,853
|
|
128,489
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
128,489
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Deferred compensation plan assets
|
—
|
|
17,805
|
|
—
|
|
17,805
|
|
—
|
|
13,626
|
|
—
|
|
13,626
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
508,608
|
|
$
|
441,918
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
950,526
|
|
$
|
380,615
|
|
$
|
801,360
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,181,975
|
|
|||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Acquisition related contingent consideration liabilities
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
49,480
|
|
$
|
49,480
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
12,519
|
|
$
|
12,519
|
|
|||||||
|
Deferred compensation liability
|
—
|
|
14,957
|
|
—
|
|
14,957
|
|
—
|
|
12,071
|
|
—
|
|
12,071
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
14,957
|
|
$
|
49,480
|
|
$
|
64,437
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
12,071
|
|
$
|
12,519
|
|
$
|
24,590
|
|
|||||||
The Company holds available-for-sale securities that consist of highly liquid, investment grade debt securities. The Company determines the fair value of its debt securities based upon one or more valuations reported by its investment accounting and reporting service provider. The investment service provider values the securities using a hierarchical security pricing model that relies primarily on valuations provided by an industry-recognized valuation service. Such valuations may be based on trade prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs) or valuation models using inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2 inputs), such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, yield curve, volatility factors, credit spreads, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments or debt, broker and dealer quotes, as well as other relevant economic measures. The Company’s deferred compensation plan assets consist primarily of mutual funds. The Company performs certain procedures to corroborate the fair value of its holdings, including comparing valuations obtained from its investment service provider to valuations reported by the Company’s asset custodians.
The Company reassesses the fair value of contingent consideration to be settled in cash related to acquisitions on a quarterly basis using the income approach. This is a Level 3 measurement. Significant assumptions used in the measurement include probabilities of achieving the remaining milestones and the discount rates, which depend on the milestone risk profiles. The changes in fair value of the contingent considerations during the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
were due to changes in the estimated payments and a shorter discounting period.
66
Changes in estimated fair value of contingent consideration liabilities from
January 2, 2011
through
December 29, 2013
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Contingent
Consideration
Liability
(Level 3 Measurement)
|
||
|
Balance as of January 2, 2011
|
$
|
3,738
|
|
|
Acquisition of Epicentre
|
7,400
|
|
|
|
Change in estimated fair value, recorded in acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2012
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of BlueGnome
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
Change in estimated fair value, recorded in acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
(3,594
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2012
|
12,519
|
|
|
|
Additional liability recorded for current period acquisitions
|
60,184
|
|
|
|
Change in estimated fair value, recorded in acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
(18,784
|
)
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
(4,439
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2013
|
$
|
49,480
|
|
|
6.
|
Convertible Senior Notes
|
0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016
In 2011, the Company issued
$920.0 million
aggregate principal amount of
0.25%
convertible senior notes due 2016 (2016 Notes) in an offering conducted in accordance with Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 2016 Notes were issued at
98.25%
of par value. Debt issuance costs of approximately
$0.4 million
were primarily comprised of legal, accounting, and other professional fees, the majority of which were recorded in other noncurrent assets and are being amortized to interest expense over the
five
-year term of the 2016 Notes.
The 2016 Notes will be convertible into cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, at the Company’s election, based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of
11.9687
shares per
$1,000
principal amount of the 2016 Notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately
$83.55
per share), only in the following circumstances and to the following extent:
(1) during the five business-day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per 2016 Note for each day of such measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock and the conversion rate on each such day; (2) during any calendar quarter (and only during that quarter) after the calendar quarter ending March 31, 2011, if the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock for 20 or more trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeds 130% of the applicable conversion price in effect on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter; (3) upon the occurrence of specified events described in the indenture for the 2016 Notes; and (4) at any time on or after December 15, 2015 through the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date.
As noted in the indenture for the 2016 Notes, it is the Company’s intent and policy to settle conversions through combination settlement, which essentially involves repayment of an amount of cash equal to the “principal portion” and delivery of the “share amount” in excess of the conversion value over the principal portion in shares of common stock. In general, for each
$1,000
in principal, the “principal portion” of cash upon settlement is defined as the lesser of
$1,000
, and the conversion value during the
20
-day observation period as described in the indenture for the 2016 Notes. The conversion value is the sum of the daily conversion value which is the product of the effective conversion rate divided by
20
days and the daily volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Company’s common stock. The “share amount” is the cumulative “daily share amount” during the observation period, which is calculated by dividing the daily VWAP into the difference between the daily conversion value (i.e., conversion rate x daily VWAP) and
$1,000
.
67
The Company pays
0.25%
interest per annum on the principal amount of the 2016 Notes semiannually in arrears in cash on March 15 and September 15 of each year. The 2016 Notes mature on
March 15, 2016
. If a designated event, as defined in the indenture for the 2016 Notes, such as an acquisition, merger, or liquidation, occurs prior to the maturity date, subject to certain limitations, holders of the 2016 Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their 2016 Notes for cash at a repurchase price equal to
100%
of the principal amount of the 2016 Notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.
The Company accounts separately for the liability and equity components of the 2016 Notes in accordance with authoritative guidance for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion. The guidance requires the carrying amount of the liability component to be estimated by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated conversion feature. Because the Company has no outstanding non-convertible public debt, the Company determined that senior, unsecured corporate bonds traded on the market represent a similar liability to the convertible senior notes without the conversion option. Based on market data available for publicly traded, senior, unsecured corporate bonds issued by companies in the same industry and with similar maturity, the Company estimated the implied interest rate of its 2016 Notes to be
4.5%
, assuming no conversion option. Assumptions used in the estimate represent what market participants would use in pricing the liability component, including market interest rates, credit standing, and yield curves, all of which are defined as Level 2 observable inputs. The estimated implied interest rate was applied to the 2016 Notes, which resulted in a fair value of the liability component of
$748.5 million
upon issuance, calculated as the present value of implied future payments based on the
$920.0 million
aggregate principal amount. The
$155.4 million
difference between the cash proceeds of
$903.9 million
and the estimated fair value of the liability component was recorded in additional paid-in capital as the 2016 Notes were not considered redeemable.
As a policy election under applicable guidance related to the calculation of diluted net income per share, the Company elected the combination settlement method as its stated settlement policy and applied the treasury stock method in the calculation of dilutive impact of the 2016 Notes. During the years ended December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, the 2016 Notes were not convertible. However, as the market price of the Company’s common stock exceeded the conversion price during the last months of 2013, the calculation of dilutive potential common shares outstanding for the year ended December 29, 2013 reflects the dilutive impact from the 2016 Notes. The 2016 Notes had no dilutive impact for the year ended December 30, 2012. If the 2016 Notes were converted as of
December 29, 2013
, the if-converted value would exceed the principal amount by
$209.0 million
.
0.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014
In 2007, the Company issued
$400.0 million
principal amount of
0.625%
convertible senior notes due 2014 (2014 Notes). The Company pays
0.625%
interest per annum on the principal amount of the 2014 Notes semi-annually in arrears in cash on February 15 and August 15 of each year. The 2014 Notes mature on
February 15, 2014
. The effective interest rate of the liability component was estimated to be
8.3%
.
The Company entered into hedge transactions concurrently with the issuance of the 2014 Notes under which the Company is entitled to purchase up to approximately
18.3 million
shares of the Company’s common stock at a strike price of approximately
$21.83
per share, subject to adjustment. The convertible note hedge transactions had the effect of reducing dilution to the Company’s stockholders upon conversion of the 2014 Notes. Also concurrently with the issuance of the 2014 Notes, the Company sold to the hedge counterparties warrants exercisable, on a cashless basis, for up to approximately
18.3 million
shares of the Company’s common stock at a strike price of
$31.435
per share, subject to adjustment. The proceeds from these warrants partially offset the cost to the Company of the convertible note hedge transactions.
The 2014 Notes became convertible into cash and shares of the Company’s common stock in various prior periods and became convertible again from April 1, 2012 through, and including,
February 12, 2014
. In all cases of conversions of the 2014 Notes, the principal amount of all 2014 Notes converted was repaid with cash and the excess of the conversion value over the principal amount was paid in shares of common stock. The equity dilution resulting from the issuance of common stock related to the conversion of the 2014 Notes was offset by repurchase of the same amount of shares under the convertible note hedge transactions, which were automatically exercised in accordance with their terms at the time of each such conversion. As of
December 29, 2013
, there remained in place the balance of the convertible note hedge transactions with respect to
$29.6 million
principal amount of the 2014 Notes, which are convertible for up to approximately
1.4 million
shares of the Company’s common stock. If the remaining 2014 Notes were converted as of
December 29, 2013
, the if-converted value would exceed the principal amount by
$109.3 million
.
68
As a result of the conversions during the year ended
December 29, 2013
, the Company recorded losses on extinguishment of debt calculated as the difference between the estimated fair value of the debt and the carrying value of the notes as of the settlement dates. To measure the fair value of the converted notes as of the settlement dates, the applicable interest rates were estimated using Level 2 observable inputs and applied to the converted notes using the same methodology as in the issuance date valuation.
The following table summarizes information about the conversion of the 2014 Notes during year ended
December 29, 2013
(in thousands, except percentages):
|
2014 Notes
|
||||
|
Cash paid for principal of notes converted
|
$
|
10,555
|
|
|
|
Conversion value over principal amount paid in shares of common stock
|
$
|
21,217
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of common stock issued upon conversion
|
317
|
|
||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
|
Effective interest rate used to measure fair value of converted notes upon conversion
|
0.5% - 0.8%
|
|
||
The following table summarizes information about the equity and liability components of the 2014 and 2016 Notes (dollars in thousands). The fair values of the respective notes outstanding were measured based on quoted market prices.
|
December 29, 2013
|
December 30, 2012
|
||||||
|
Principal amount of convertible notes outstanding
|
$
|
949,570
|
|
$
|
960,125
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discount of liability component
|
(80,977
|
)
|
(117,752
|
)
|
|||
|
Net carrying amount of liability component
|
868,593
|
|
842,373
|
|
|||
|
Less: current portion
|
(29,288
|
)
|
(36,967
|
)
|
|||
|
Long-term debt
|
$
|
839,305
|
|
$
|
805,406
|
|
|
|
Conversion option subject to cash settlement
|
$
|
282
|
|
$
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
Carrying value of equity component, net of issuance costs
|
$
|
274,304
|
|
$
|
271,966
|
|
|
|
Fair value of outstanding notes
|
$
|
1,428,743
|
|
$
|
993,916
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining amortization period of discount on the liability component
|
2 years
|
|
3 years
|
|
|||
|
7.
|
Commitments
|
Leases
The Company leases office and manufacturing facilities under various noncancellable lease agreements. Facility leases generally provide for periodic rent increases, and many contain escalation clauses and renewal options. Certain leases require the Company to pay property taxes and routine maintenance. The Company is headquartered in San Diego, California and leases facilities in San Diego and the San Francisco Bay Area in California; Madison, Wisconsin; Morrisville, North Carolina; Australia; Brazil; China; France; Japan; Singapore; the Netherlands; and the United Kingdom. The lease for the Company’s headquarters expires in
2031
, with
four
five
-year options to extend.
During 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to sublease sections of its former headquarters. The sublease has an initial term of approximately
ten
years. In conjunction with the sublease, the Company issued a letter of credit in the amount of
$8.0 million
, which will decrease ratably to
zero
over the term of the sublease.
69
Annual future minimum payments under operating leases as of
December 29, 2013
were as follows (in thousands):
|
Operating Leases
|
Sublease Income
|
Net Operating Leases
|
|||||||||
|
2014
|
$
|
29,526
|
|
$
|
(2,478
|
)
|
$
|
27,048
|
|
||
|
2015
|
29,463
|
|
(2,552
|
)
|
26,911
|
|
|||||
|
2016
|
29,327
|
|
(2,629
|
)
|
26,698
|
|
|||||
|
2017
|
29,383
|
|
(2,708
|
)
|
26,675
|
|
|||||
|
2018
|
29,601
|
|
(2,789
|
)
|
26,812
|
|
|||||
|
Thereafter
|
395,342
|
|
(14,708
|
)
|
380,634
|
|
|||||
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
$
|
542,642
|
|
$
|
(27,864
|
)
|
$
|
514,778
|
|
||
Rent expenses were
$28.1 million
,
$21.4 million
, and
$17.4 million
for the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, respectively.
The Company recorded facility exit obligations upon vacating its former headquarters during the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
. Changes in the facility exit obligation from
January 1, 2012
through
December 29, 2013
are as follows (in thousands):
|
Headquarter Facility Exit Obligation
|
|||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2012:
|
$
|
25,049
|
|
|
Adjustment to facility exit obligation
|
24,878
|
|
|
|
Accretion of interest expense
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
(6,704
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2012:
|
45,352
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to facility exit obligation
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
Accretion of interest expense
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
(9,758
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2013
|
$
|
38,218
|
|
Warranties
Changes in the Company’s reserve for product warranties from
January 2, 2011
through
December 29, 2013
are as follows (in thousands):
|
Warranty Reserve
|
|||
|
Balance as of January 2, 2011
|
$
|
16,761
|
|
|
Additions charged to cost of revenue
|
17,913
|
|
|
|
Repairs and replacements
|
(22,708
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2012
|
11,966
|
|
|
|
Additions charged to cost of revenue
|
17,279
|
|
|
|
Repairs and replacements
|
(19,109
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2012
|
10,136
|
|
|
|
Additions charged to cost of revenue
|
15,674
|
|
|
|
Repairs and replacements
|
(15,403
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2013
|
$
|
10,407
|
|
70
|
8.
|
Share-based Compensation Expense
|
Total share-based compensation expense for all stock awards consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Cost of product revenue
|
$
|
6,223
|
|
$
|
7,575
|
|
$
|
6,951
|
|
||
|
Cost of service and other revenue
|
777
|
|
461
|
|
695
|
|
|||||
|
Research and development
|
37,439
|
|
30,879
|
|
32,105
|
|
|||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
61,387
|
|
55,409
|
|
52,341
|
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation expense before taxes
|
105,826
|
|
94,324
|
|
92,092
|
|
|||||
|
Related income tax benefits
|
(32,819
|
)
|
(30,759
|
)
|
(32,168
|
)
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes
|
$
|
73,007
|
|
$
|
63,565
|
|
$
|
59,924
|
|
||
The assumptions used for the specified reporting periods and the resulting estimates of weighted-average fair value per share of options granted and for stock purchased under the ESPP during those periods are as follows:
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Stock options granted:
|
|||||||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.14 - 1.86%
|
|
0.56 - 0.93%
|
|
0.85 - 2.23%
|
|
|||||
|
Expected volatility
|
30 - 44%
|
|
41 - 48%
|
|
41 - 53%
|
|
|||||
|
Expected term
|
0.8 - 9.4 years
|
|
4.0 - 6.6 years
|
|
4.7 - 5.5 years
|
|
|||||
|
Expected dividends
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Weighted average fair value per share
|
$
|
40.66
|
|
$
|
15.47
|
|
$
|
27.47
|
|
||
|
Stock purchased under the ESPP:
|
|||||||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.08 - 0.15%
|
|
0.09 - 0.17%
|
|
0.16 - 0.30%
|
|
|||||
|
Expected volatility
|
31 - 32%
|
|
33 - 64%
|
|
43 - 48%
|
|
|||||
|
Expected term
|
0.5 - 1.0 year
|
|
0.5 - 1.0 year
|
|
0.5 - 1.0 year
|
|
|||||
|
Expected dividends
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Weighted average fair value per share
|
$
|
19.30
|
|
$
|
16.45
|
|
$
|
20.08
|
|
||
As of
December 29, 2013
, approximately
$216.9 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options, restricted stock, and ESPP shares issued to date is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
2.2 years
.
|
9.
|
Stockholders’ Equity
|
The Company’s 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan (the 2005 Stock Plan), 2005 Solexa Equity Incentive Plan (the 2005 Solexa Equity Plan), the Verinata Health, Inc. 2008 Stock Plan (the 2008 Stock Plan), and the New Hire Stock and Incentive Plan allow for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock units and awards, and performance stock units. During
December 29, 2013
, the stockholders ratified an amendment to increase the maximum number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2005 Stock Plan by
5.0 million
shares. As of
December 29, 2013
, approximately
6.8 million
shares remained available for future grants under the 2005 Stock Plan, the 2005 Solexa Equity Plan, and the 2008 Verinata Health Stock Plan. There is no set number of shares reserved for issuance under the New Hire Stock and Incentive Plan.
71
Stock Options
Stock options granted at the time of hire primarily vest over a
four
or
five
-year period, with
25%
or
20%
of options vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and the remaining options vesting monthly over the remaining vesting period. Stock options granted subsequent to hiring primarily vest monthly over a
four
or
five
-year period.
Each grant of options has a maximum term of
ten
years, measured from the applicable grant date, subject to earlier termination if the optionee’s service ceases. Vesting in all cases is subject to the individual’s continued service through the vesting date. The Company satisfies option exercises through the issuance of new shares.
The Company’s stock option activity under all stock option plans from
January 2, 2011
through
December 29, 2013
is as follows:
|
Options
(in thousands)
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||
|
Outstanding at January 2, 2011
|
11,882
|
|
$
|
22.83
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
1,399
|
|
64.98
|
|
||
|
Exercised
|
(2,784
|
)
|
17.98
|
|
||
|
Cancelled
|
(119
|
)
|
33.49
|
|
||
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2012
|
10,378
|
|
29.69
|
|
||
|
Granted
|
251
|
|
40.79
|
|
||
|
Exercised
|
(2,071
|
)
|
20.34
|
|
||
|
Cancelled
|
(207
|
)
|
39.18
|
|
||
|
Outstanding at December 30, 2012
|
8,351
|
|
32.10
|
|
||
|
Granted
|
512
|
|
14.74
|
|
||
|
Exercised
|
(3,006
|
)
|
27.70
|
|
||
|
Cancelled
|
(133
|
)
|
41.80
|
|
||
|
Outstanding at December 29, 2013
|
5,724
|
|
$
|
32.64
|
|
|
At
December 29, 2013
, outstanding options to purchase
4.7 million
shares were exercisable with a weighted average per share exercise price of
$31.83
. The weighted average remaining life of options outstanding and exercisable is
4.9 years
and
4.5 years
, respectively, as of
December 29, 2013
.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable as of
December 29, 2013
was
$445.0 million
and
$370.9 million
, respectively. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the product of the number of options outstanding multiplied by the difference between the Company’s closing stock price per share on the last trading day of the fiscal period, which was
$110.38
as of
December 27, 2013
, and the exercise price. Total intrinsic value of options exercised was
$141.7 million
,
$60.6 million
, and
$136.5 million
for the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, respectively. Total fair value of options vested was
$24.0 million
,
$31.9 million
, and
$49.5 million
for the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, respectively.
Restricted Stock
The Company issues restricted stock units (RSU), restricted stock awards (RSA), and performance stock units (PSU). The Company grants RSU and PSU pursuant to its 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan and 2008 Stock Plan. RSU are share awards that, upon vesting, will deliver to the holder shares of the Company’s common stock. For grants to new hires prior to July 2011 and for grants to existing employees, RSU generally vest
15%
on the first anniversary of the grant date,
20%
on the second anniversary of the grant date,
30%
on the third anniversary of the grant date, and
35%
on the fourth anniversary of the grant date. For grants to new hires subsequent to July 2011, RSU generally vest over a
four
-year period with equal vesting on anniversaries of the grant date. The Company satisfies RSU vesting through the issuance of new shares. The Company issues PSU for which the number of shares issuable at the end of a
three
-year performance period will range from
50%
and
150%
of the shares approved in the award based on the Company’s performance relative to specified earnings per share targets.
72
The Company also issues RSA that are released based on service related vesting conditions. RSA may be issued from the Company’s treasury stock or granted pursuant to the Company’s 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan.
A summary of the Company’s restricted stock activity and related information from
January 2, 2011
through
December 29, 2013
is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair Value per Share
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
RSA
|
RSU
|
PSU
|
RSA
|
RSU
|
PSU
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at January 2, 2011
|
—
|
|
3,109
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
40.39
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Awarded
|
230
|
|
1,550
|
|
—
|
|
65.95
|
|
42.02
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Vested
|
—
|
|
(827
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
36.47
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Cancelled
|
—
|
|
(356
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
42.15
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2012
|
230
|
|
3,476
|
|
—
|
|
65.95
|
|
41.87
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Awarded
|
312
|
|
1,640
|
|
599
|
|
47.91
|
|
48.52
|
|
49.66
|
|
||||||||
|
Vested
|
(77
|
)
|
(1,062
|
)
|
—
|
|
65.95
|
|
38.48
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Cancelled
|
—
|
|
(394
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
—
|
|
45.05
|
|
50.54
|
|
||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 30, 2012
|
465
|
|
3,660
|
|
587
|
|
53.84
|
|
45.49
|
|
49.64
|
|
||||||||
|
Awarded
|
—
|
|
1,532
|
|
584
|
|
—
|
|
77.53
|
|
59.16
|
|
||||||||
|
Vested
|
(217
|
)
|
(1,308
|
)
|
—
|
|
54.27
|
|
42.97
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Cancelled
|
—
|
|
(256
|
)
|
(70
|
)
|
—
|
|
49.24
|
|
50.42
|
|
||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 29, 2013
|
248
|
|
3,628
|
|
1,101
|
|
$
|
53.46
|
|
$
|
59.66
|
|
$
|
54.64
|
|
|||||
Pre-tax intrinsic values of all outstanding restricted and performance stock and total fair values of vested restricted and performance stock are as follows (in thousands):
|
Years Ended
|
|||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Pre-tax intrinsic value of outstanding restricted and performance stock:
|
|||||||||||
|
RSA
|
$
|
27,384
|
|
$
|
25,437
|
|
$
|
6,986
|
|
||
|
RSU
|
400,421
|
|
200,383
|
|
105,944
|
|
|||||
|
PSU
|
121,555
|
|
32,149
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Fair value of restricted and performance stock vested:
|
|||||||||||
|
RSA
|
$
|
11,750
|
|
$
|
5,039
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
RSU
|
56,212
|
|
40,870
|
|
30,155
|
|
|||||
|
PSU
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
A total of
15.5 million
shares of the Company’s common stock have been reserved for issuance under its 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discount, but only through payroll deductions, during defined offering periods. The price at which stock is purchased under the ESPP is equal to
85%
of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or last day of the offering period, whichever is lower. The initial offering period commenced in July 2000.
The ESPP provides for annual increases of shares available for issuance by the lesser of
3%
of the number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year,
3.0 million
shares, or such
73
lesser amount as determined by the Company’s board of directors. Approximately
400,000
,
328,000
, and
328,000
shares were issued under the ESPP during the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, respectively. As of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, there were approximately
15.0 million
and
15.4 million
shares available for issuance under the ESPP, respectively.
Warrants
In connection with the offering of the Company’s 2014 Notes, the Company sold warrants to purchase
18.3 million
shares of common stock to counterparties to the convertible note hedge transactions. The warrants have an exercise price of
$31.435
per share. In July 2013, the Company settled with a hedging counterparty outstanding warrants to purchase approximately
3.0 million
shares of the Company’s common stock for
$125.0 million
in cash. As of
December 29, 2013
, warrants to purchase
15.4 million
shares of the Company’s common stock remained outstanding. All outstanding warrants expire in equal installments during the
40
consecutive scheduled trading days beginning on May 16, 2014.
During the year ended January 1, 2012, the remaining warrants assumed by the Company in a prior acquisition to purchase approximately
505,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock were exercised, resulting in cash proceeds to the Company of approximately
$5.5 million
.
Share Repurchases
During the years ended
December 29, 2013
, December 30, 2012, and January 1, 2012, the Company repurchased approximately
0.9 million
shares for
$50.0 million
,
1.9 million
shares for
$82.5 million
, and
2.4 million
shares for
$156.0 million
, respectively. In addition, concurrently with the issuance of the Company’s 2016 Notes in 2011, approximately
4.9 million
shares were repurchased for
$314.3 million
.
As of
December 29, 2013
, the Company had authorization to repurchase up to an additional
$117.5 million
of its common stock, which was part of the
$250.0 million
stock repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors in April 2012 via a combination of Rule 10b5-1 and discretionary share repurchase programs. In addition, on January 30, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized up to
$250.0 million
to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock on a discretionary basis.
In August 2011, the Company’s board of directors authorized a
$100.0 million
discretionary repurchase program, which became completely utilized as of January 1, 2012. In July 2010, the Company’s board of directors authorized a
$200.0 million
stock repurchase program, with
$100.0 million
allocated to repurchasing Company common stock under a 10b5-1 plan over a
twelve
month period and
$100.0 million
allocated to repurchasing Company common stock at management’s discretion during open trading windows. This authorized repurchase amount had been utilized completely as of January 1, 2012.
Stockholder Rights Plan
In connection with the unsolicited tender offer by Roche (refer to note “15. Unsolicited Tender Offer”), on January 25, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (Right) for each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock. Each Right entitled the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of the Company’s Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value
$0.01
per share (Preferred Shares), at a price of
$275.00
per
one thousandth
of a Preferred Share, subject to adjustment. The Rights were not exercisable until such time that the Board of Directors determined to eliminate its deferral of the date on which separate Rights certificates are issued and the Rights traded separately from the Company’s common stock (Distribution Date). If a person or group (triggering party) acquired
15%
or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, each Right would have entitled holders other than the triggering party to purchase, at the exercise price of the Right, a number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the exercise price of the Right. If the Company was acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after a person acquires
15%
or more of the Company’s common stock, each Right would have entitled holders other than the triggering party to purchase, at the Right’s then-current exercise price, a number of common shares of the acquiring company that at the time of such transaction have a market value of two times the exercise price of the Right. The Board of Directors would have been entitled to redeem the Rights at a price of
$0.001
per Right at any time before the Distribution Date. The Board of Directors would have been entitled to exchange the Rights at an exchange ratio per Right of
one
share of common stock after any person acquires beneficial ownership of
15%
or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, and prior to the acquisition of
50%
or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. In 2013, the expiration date was amended to March 27, 2013 from January 26, 2017, and the Rights expired accordingly.
74
|
10.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
The Company is involved in various lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to intellectual property, employment, and contractual matters. In connection with these matters, the Company assesses, on a regular basis, the probability and range of possible loss based on the developments in these matters. A liability is recorded in the financial statements if it is believed to be probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable and unfavorable results could occur, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. The Company regularly reviews outstanding legal matters to determine the adequacy of the liabilities accrued and related disclosures. The amount of ultimate loss may differ from these estimates. Each matter presents its own unique circumstances, and prior litigation does not necessarily provide a reliable basis on which to predict the outcome, or range of outcomes, in any individual proceeding. Because of the uncertainties related to the occurrence, amount, and range of loss on any pending litigation or claim, the Company is currently unable to predict their ultimate outcome, and, with respect to any pending litigation or claim where no liability has been accrued, to make a meaningful estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome. In the event that opposing litigants in outstanding litigations or claims ultimately succeed at trial and any subsequent appeals on their claims, any potential loss or charges in excess of any established accruals, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows in the period in which the unfavorable outcome occurs or becomes probable, and potentially in future periods.
On November 24, 2010, Syntrix Biosystems, Inc. filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Tacoma (Case No. C10-5870-BHS) alleging that the Company willfully infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,951,682 by selling its BeadChip array products, and that the Company misappropriated Syntrix’s trade secrets. In November and December 2012, the Company filed motions for summary judgment that the patent is not infringed and is invalid, and that Syntrix’s trade secrets claims are barred by various statutes of limitation. Syntrix filed a motion for summary judgment that the patent is valid. On January 30, 2013, the Court granted the Company’s motion for summary judgment on Syntrix’s trade secret claims, and dismissed those claims from the case. The Court denied Syntrix’s motion for summary judgment on validity, and denied the Company’s motion for summary judgment for non-infringement and invalidity. On March 14, 2013, a jury reached a verdict in favor of Syntrix, finding that Illumina’s BeadChip kits infringe the Syntrix patent. During trial, the Court dismissed Syntrix’s claim that the alleged infringement was willful. On July 1, 2013, the Court entered a Final Amended Judgment for
$115.1 million
, in accordance with the jury verdict, including supplemental damages and prejudgment interest. In addition, the Court awarded Syntrix an ongoing royalty of
8%
for accused sales from March 15, 2013 until the patent expires on September 16, 2019. On July 17, 2013, the Company filed a post-trial motion asking the District Court to vacate the amended judgment and enter judgment as a matter of law in the Company’s favor or, alternatively, to grant a new trial. On November 4, 2013, the Court issued an Order denying the Company’s motion for judgment as a matter of law and upholding the jury verdict. On December 3, 2013 the Company filed a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit challenging the Final Amended Judgment.
As a result of the amended judgment, the Company has recorded a legal contingency accrual of
$132.9 million
as of
December 29, 2013
, which includes the damages and prejudgment interest awarded to Syntrix, estimated additional damages through
December 29, 2013
, and an estimate of interest accrued on the damages subsequent to June 19, 2013. For the year ended
December 29, 2013
, such charges totaled
$132.9 million
,
$114.6 million
of which was recorded within operating expenses, and the remainder was recorded to cost of sales. In December 2013, the Company secured the amount of the judgment by executing a supersedeas bond and deposited
$12.0 million
of the accrued post-judgment ongoing royalty amounts with the Court. The Company will continue to deposit with the Court ongoing royalties on future sales at the royalty rate stated in the Final Amended Judgment during the appeal process. Funds deposited with the Court are reported as restricted cash in other long-term assets.
75
|
11.
|
Income Taxes
|
The income (loss) before income taxes summarized by region is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
(53,703
|
)
|
$
|
102,296
|
|
$
|
(7,100
|
)
|
||
|
Foreign
|
213,017
|
|
120,312
|
|
140,145
|
|
|||||
|
Total income before income taxes
|
$
|
159,314
|
|
$
|
222,608
|
|
$
|
133,045
|
|
||
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
78,419
|
|
$
|
57,285
|
|
$
|
43,161
|
|
||
|
State
|
8,854
|
|
10,121
|
|
3,958
|
|
|||||
|
Foreign
|
39,416
|
|
31,504
|
|
24,154
|
|
|||||
|
Total current provision
|
126,689
|
|
98,910
|
|
71,273
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Federal
|
(69,102
|
)
|
(7,724
|
)
|
(22,738
|
)
|
|||||
|
State
|
(15,222
|
)
|
(7,708
|
)
|
(8,050
|
)
|
|||||
|
Foreign
|
(8,359
|
)
|
(12,124
|
)
|
5,932
|
|
|||||
|
Total deferred benefit
|
(92,683
|
)
|
(27,556
|
)
|
(24,856
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total tax provision
|
$
|
34,006
|
|
$
|
71,354
|
|
$
|
46,417
|
|
||
The provision for income taxes reconciles to the amount computed by applying the federal statutory rate to income before taxes as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Tax at federal statutory rate
|
$
|
55,760
|
|
$
|
77,913
|
|
$
|
46,566
|
|
||
|
State, net of federal benefit
|
647
|
|
4,056
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|||||
|
Research and other credits
|
(10,977
|
)
|
(2,613
|
)
|
(7,418
|
)
|
|||||
|
Acquired in-process research & development
|
—
|
|
137
|
|
1,989
|
|
|||||
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
10,544
|
|
(37
|
)
|
(688
|
)
|
|||||
|
Permanent differences
|
1,120
|
|
2,380
|
|
1,668
|
|
|||||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
(3,859
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,311
|
)
|
|||||
|
Impact of foreign operations
|
(18,006
|
)
|
(11,470
|
)
|
5,579
|
|
|||||
|
Other
|
(1,223
|
)
|
988
|
|
81
|
|
|||||
|
Total tax provision
|
$
|
34,006
|
|
$
|
71,354
|
|
$
|
46,417
|
|
||
76
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
||||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net operating losses
|
$
|
66,969
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
Tax credits
|
36,277
|
|
16,447
|
|
|||
|
Other accruals and reserves
|
103,539
|
|
47,306
|
|
|||
|
Stock compensation
|
36,728
|
|
39,175
|
|
|||
|
Inventory adjustments
|
9,034
|
|
8,977
|
|
|||
|
Impairment of cost-method investment
|
3,540
|
|
1,406
|
|
|||
|
Other amortization
|
9,571
|
|
5,195
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
14,704
|
|
13,469
|
|
|||
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
280,362
|
|
134,539
|
|
|||
|
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
|
(19,132
|
)
|
(1,756
|
)
|
|||
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
261,230
|
|
132,783
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Purchased intangible amortization
|
(98,671
|
)
|
(20,116
|
)
|
|||
|
Convertible debt
|
(27,821
|
)
|
(38,910
|
)
|
|||
|
Property and equipment
|
(13,311
|
)
|
(10,867
|
)
|
|||
|
Other
|
(6,349
|
)
|
(6,682
|
)
|
|||
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(146,152
|
)
|
(76,575
|
)
|
|||
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
$
|
115,078
|
|
$
|
56,208
|
|
|
A valuation allowance is established when it is more likely than not the future realization of all or some of the deferred tax assets will not be achieved. The evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance is performed on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, and includes a review of all available positive and negative evidence. Based on the available evidence as of
December 29, 2013
, the Company was not able to conclude it is more likely than not certain U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized. Therefore, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of
$19.1 million
against certain U.S. deferred tax assets. During the year ended
December 29, 2013
, the valuation allowance increased by
$17.4 million
, primarily due to a
$10.5 million
increase in the provision for income taxes as a result of the estimated limitation on foreign tax credit utilization in the United States, and a
$6.8 million
increase in goodwill related to pre-acquisition deferred tax assets from entities acquired during the year.
As of
December 29, 2013
, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state tax purposes of
$164.2 million
and
$228.1 million
, respectively, which will begin to expire in
2020
and
2014
, respectively, unless utilized prior. In addition, the Company also had federal and state tax credit carryforwards of
$16.1 million
and
$51.5 million
, respectively, which will begin to expire in 2023 and 2019, respectively, unless utilized prior.
Pursuant to Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, utilization of the Company’s net operating loss and credits may be subject to annual limitations in the event of any significant future changes in its ownership structure. These annual limitations may result in the expiration of net operating losses and credits prior to utilization. The deferred tax assets as of
December 29, 2013
are net of any previous limitations due to Section 382 and 383.
The Company recognizes excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation to stockholders’ equity only when realized. When assessing whether excess tax benefits relating to share-based compensation have been realized, the Company follows the with-and-without approach excluding any indirect effects of the excess tax deductions. Under this approach, excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation are not deemed to be realized until after the utilization of all other tax benefits available to the Company. During the year ended
December 29, 2013
, the Company realized
$53.0 million
of such excess tax benefits, and recorded a corresponding credit to additional paid in capital. As of
December 29, 2013
, the Company has
$3.6 million
of unrealized excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation. These tax benefits will
77
be accounted for as a credit to additional paid-in capital, if and when realized, rather than a reduction of the provision for income taxes.
The Company’s manufacturing operations in Singapore operate under various tax holidays and incentives that will expire in 2018. For the year ended
December 29, 2013
, these tax holidays and incentives resulted in a
$7.5 million
decrease to the provision for income taxes and an increase in net income per diluted share of
$0.05
.
It is the Company’s intention to indefinitely reinvest all current and future foreign earnings in order to ensure sufficient working capital to support and expand existing operations outside the United States. Accordingly, residual U.S. income taxes have not been provided on
$235.1 million
of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as of
December 29, 2013
. In the event the Company was required to repatriate funds from outside of the United States, such repatriation would be subject to local laws, customs, and tax consequences.
The following table summarizes the gross amount of the Company’s uncertain tax positions (in thousands):
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
37,585
|
|
$
|
28,396
|
|
$
|
22,729
|
|
||
|
Increases related to prior year tax positions
|
4,794
|
|
2,573
|
|
875
|
|
|||||
|
Decreases related to prior year tax positions
|
(223
|
)
|
(69
|
)
|
(382
|
)
|
|||||
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
7,503
|
|
6,685
|
|
5,174
|
|
|||||
|
Decreases related to lapse of statute of limitations
|
(613
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
49,046
|
|
$
|
37,585
|
|
$
|
28,396
|
|
||
Included in the balance of uncertain tax positions as of
December 29, 2013
, and
December 30, 2012
, are
$40.1 million
and
$29.9 million
, respectively, of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective income tax rate in future periods.
Any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are reflected in the provision for income taxes. The Company recognized expense of
$1.0 million
,
$0.8 million
, and
$1.1 million
, related to potential interest penalties on uncertain tax positions during the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, respectively. The Company recorded a liability for potential interest and penalties of
$3.5 million
and
$2.1 million
as of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, respectively.
The Company is currently under examination by the IRS for tax year 2011. The IRS continues to gather information regarding the 2011 federal tax return and has not yet proposed any adjustments to the filed return. Tax years
1997
to
2013
remain subject to future examination by the major tax jurisdictions in which the Company is subject to tax. Given the uncertainty of potential adjustments from the current examination as well as the impact of the current examination on the potential expiration of the statute of limitations, it is reasonably possible that the balance of unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly over the next 12 months. However, at this time, an estimate of the range of reasonably possible adjustments to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits cannot be determined given the number of matters being examined and the number of years that are potentially subject to examination.
|
12.
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
Retirement Plan
The Company has a 401(k) savings plan covering substantially all of its employees in the United States. Company contributions to the plan are discretionary. During the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, the Company made matching contributions of
$7.0 million
,
$5.5 million
, and
$5.3 million
, respectively.
78
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company adopted the Illumina, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the Plan) that became effective January 1, 2008. Eligible participants, which include the Company’s senior level employees and members of the board of directors, can contribute up to
80%
of their base salary and
100%
of all other forms of compensation into the Plan, including bonus, equity awards, commission, and director fees. The Company has agreed to credit the participants’ contributions with earnings that reflect the performance of certain independent investment funds. On a discretionary basis, the Company may also make employer contributions to participant accounts in any amount determined by the Company. The vesting schedules of employer contributions are at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. However, all employer contributions shall become 100% vested upon the occurrence of the participant’s disability, death or retirement or a change in control of the Company. The benefits under this plan are unsecured. Participants are generally eligible to receive payment of their vested benefit at the end of their elected deferral period or after termination of their employment with the Company for any reason or at a later date to comply with the restrictions of Section 409A. As of
December 29, 2013
, no employer contributions were made to the Plan.
In January 2008, the Company also established a rabbi trust for the benefit of the participants under the Plan. In accordance with authoritative guidance related to consolidation of variable interest entities and accounting for deferred compensation arrangements where amounts earned are held in a rabbi trust and invested, the Company has included the assets of the rabbi trust in its consolidated balance sheet since the trust’s inception. As of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, the assets of the trust were
$17.8 million
and
$13.6 million
, respectively, and liabilities of the Company were
$15.0 million
and
$12.1 million
, respectively. The assets and liabilities are classified as other assets and accrued liabilities, respectively, on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the values of the assets held by the rabbi trust are recorded in other (expense) income, net in the consolidated statement of income, and changes in the values of the deferred compensation liabilities are recorded in cost of sales or operating expenses.
|
13.
|
Segment Information, Geographic Data, and Significant Customers
|
For 2013 and prior, the Company was organized in
two
operating segments: Life Sciences and Diagnostics. Life Sciences operating segment included all products and services related to the research market, namely the product lines based on the Company’s sequencing, BeadArray, and real-time PCR technologies. The Diagnostics operating segment focused on opportunities in molecular diagnostics. During all periods presented, the Diagnostics operating segment had limited activity. Accordingly, the Company’s operating results for both units were reported on an aggregate basis as
one
reportable segment.
In late 2013, we announced organizational changes effective December 30, 2013, for the primary purpose of achieving scalability in our business operations to support our growth in strategic markets. The Company has separated the roles of the Chief Executive Officer and the President, with core market and operational groups reporting to the President, and corporate functions and the President reporting to the CEO. As a result, the Company began operations as
one
operating segment starting in December 30, 2013, and will continue to report under
one
reportable segment.
The Company had revenue in the following regions for the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
(in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||||||||
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
January 1,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
714,662
|
|
$
|
568,443
|
|
$
|
528,723
|
|
||
|
Europe
|
354,682
|
|
291,404
|
|
277,971
|
|
|||||
|
Asia-Pacific
|
276,442
|
|
232,498
|
|
197,005
|
|
|||||
|
Other markets
|
75,392
|
|
56,171
|
|
51,836
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,421,178
|
|
$
|
1,148,516
|
|
$
|
1,055,535
|
|
||
Revenues are attributable to geographic areas based on the region of destination.
The majority of our product sales consist of consumables and instruments. For the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
, consumable sales represented
62%
,
64%
, and
56%
, respectively, of total revenues and instrument sales comprised
26%
,
27%
, and
35%
, respectively, of total revenues. The Company’s customers include
79
leading genomic research centers, academic institutions, government laboratories, hospitals, and reference laboratories, as well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, commercial molecular diagnostic, and consumer genomics companies. The Company had no customers that provided more than 10% of total revenue in the years ended
December 29, 2013
,
December 30, 2012
, and
January 1, 2012
.
Net long-lived assets exclude goodwill and other intangible assets since they are not allocated on a geographic basis. The Company had net long-lived assets consisting of property and equipment in the following regions as of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
(in thousands):
|
December 29,
2013 |
December 30,
2012 |
||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
150,470
|
|
$
|
126,749
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
24,122
|
|
21,740
|
|
|||
|
Singapore
|
21,311
|
|
12,504
|
|
|||
|
Other countries
|
6,763
|
|
5,174
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
202,666
|
|
$
|
166,167
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)
|
The following financial information reflects all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results and cash flows of interim periods. All quarters for fiscal years
2013
and
2012
ended
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
were
13
weeks. Summarized quarterly data for fiscal years
2013
and
2012
are as follows (in thousands except per share data):
|
First Quarter
|
Second Quarter
|
Third Quarter
|
Fourth Quarter
|
||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
330,958
|
|
$
|
346,094
|
|
$
|
356,800
|
|
$
|
387,326
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
219,292
|
|
$
|
223,409
|
|
$
|
209,940
|
|
$
|
259,246
|
|
|||
|
Net (loss) income
|
$
|
(22,587
|
)
|
$
|
35,877
|
|
$
|
31,357
|
|
$
|
80,661
|
|
|||
|
Net (loss) income per share, basic
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|||
|
Net (loss) income per share, diluted
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|||
|
2012
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
272,770
|
|
$
|
280,607
|
|
$
|
285,874
|
|
$
|
309,265
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
181,011
|
|
$
|
192,997
|
|
$
|
195,873
|
|
$
|
203,647
|
|
|||
|
Net income
|
$
|
26,202
|
|
$
|
23,401
|
|
$
|
29,748
|
|
$
|
71,903
|
|
|||
|
Net income per share, basic
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|||
|
Net income per share, diluted
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|||
|
15.
|
Unsolicited Tender Offer
|
On January 27, 2012, CKH Acquisition Corporation and Roche Holding Ltd. (together, “Roche”) commenced an unsolicited tender offer (Offer) to purchase all outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock for
$44.50
per share. As more fully described in the Company’s Solicitation/Recommendation on Schedule 14D-9 filed with the SEC on February 7, 2012 in response to the Offer, the Company’s Board of Directors unanimously recommended that the Company’s stockholders reject the Offer and not tender their shares to Roche for purchase.
On March 28, 2012, Roche revised the Offer to purchase all outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock for
$51.00
per share. As more fully described in the Amendment No. 11 to Solicitation/Recommendation on Schedule 14D-9 filed with the SEC on April 2, 2012 in response to the revised Offer, the Company’s Board of Directors unanimously recommended that the Company’s stockholders reject the Roche offer and not tender their shares to Roche for purchase. The Offer expired, without being extended, on April 20, 2012.
80
During the years ended
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, the Company recorded
$13.6 million
and
$23.1 million
, respectively in expenses in relation to the Offer, such expenses consisting primarily of legal, advisory, proxy solicitation, and other professional services fees.
ITEM 9.
Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
|
ITEM 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures.
|
We design our internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that (1) our transactions are properly authorized; (2) our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use; and (3) our transactions are properly recorded and reported in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also maintain internal controls and procedures to ensure that we comply with applicable laws and our established financial policies.
Based on management’s evaluation (under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO)), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the fourth quarter of
2013
, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect internal control over financial reporting.
An evaluation was also performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of
2013
and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. The evaluation did not identify any such change.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework). Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 29, 2013
. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 29, 2013
has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
81
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Illumina, Inc.
We have audited Illumina, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 29, 2013
, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). Illumina, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Illumina, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 29, 2013
, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Illumina, Inc. as of
December 29, 2013
and
December 30, 2012
, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
December 29, 2013
of Illumina, Inc. and our report dated
February 18, 2014
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ E
RNST
& Y
OUNG
LLP
San Diego, California
February 18, 2014
82
|
ITEM 9B.
|
Other Information.
|
None.
|
ITEM 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.
|
(a) Identification of Directors. Information concerning our directors is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Proposal One: Election of Directors,” “Information About Directors,” “Director Compensation,” and “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” to be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2014
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 28, 2014
.
(b) Identification of Executive Officers. Information concerning our executive officers is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Executive Officers” to be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2014
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 28, 2014
.
(c) Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” to be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2014
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 28, 2014
.
(d) Information concerning the audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC rules adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” to be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2014
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 28, 2014
.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics for our directors, officers, and employees, which is available on our website at www.illumina.com in the Corporate Governance portal of the Investor Relations section under “Company.” A copy of the Code of Ethics is available in print free of charge to any stockholder who requests a copy. Interested parties may address a written request for a printed copy of the Code of Ethics to: Corporate Secretary, Illumina, Inc., 5200 Illumina Way, San Diego, California 92122. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethics for our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our website. The information on, or that can be accessed from, our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.
|
ITEM 11.
|
Executive Compensation.
|
Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Director Compensation,” and “Executive Compensation” to be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2014
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 28, 2014
.
|
ITEM 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
|
Information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and information covering securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Stock Ownership of Principal Stockholders and Management,” “Executive Compensation,” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” to be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2014
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 28, 2014
.
|
ITEM 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
|
Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Proposal One: Election of Directors,” “Information About Directors,” “Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation,” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” to be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2014
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 28, 2014
.
83
|
ITEM 14.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
|
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Proposal Two: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Independent Registered Public Accountants” to be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2014
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 28, 2014
.
|
ITEM 15.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
|
1.
Financial Statements:
See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
2.
Financial Statement Schedule:
See “Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves” in this section of this Form 10-K.
3.
Exhibits:
The exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K.
84
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
|
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
|
Additions Charged
to (Reductions from) Expense/
Revenue(1)
|
Deductions(2)
|
Balance at
End of
Period
|
||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 29, 2013
|
|||||||||||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
4,280
|
|
(422
|
)
|
(178
|
)
|
$
|
3,680
|
|
|||
|
Year ended December 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
3,997
|
|
2,191
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
$
|
4,280
|
|
|||
|
Year ended January 1, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
1,686
|
|
4,201
|
|
(1,890
|
)
|
$
|
3,997
|
|
|||
_______________________________________
|
(1)
|
Additions to and reductions from allowance for doubtful accounts are recorded to selling, general and administrative expense.
|
|
(2)
|
Deductions for allowance for doubtful accounts are for accounts receivable written off.
|
85
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
||||||||||
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
Filed
|
|||||||
|
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Form
|
File Number
|
Exhibit
|
Date
|
Herewith
|
|||||||
|
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Illumina, Inc., TP Corporation, Verinata Health, Inc. and Shareholder Representative Services LLC (as the Stockholder Representative), dated as of January 6, 2013
|
10-K
|
000-35406
|
2.1
|
|
2/15/2013
|
|||||||
|
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
3.1
|
|
9/23/2008
|
|
||||||
|
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
3.2
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
||||||
|
4.1
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate
|
S-1/A
|
333-33922
|
4.1
|
|
7/3/2000
|
|
||||||
|
4.2
|
Indenture related to the 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014, dated as of February 16, 2007, between Illumina and The Bank of New York, as trustee
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
4.1
|
|
2/16/2007
|
|
||||||
|
4.3
|
Indenture related to the 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016, dated as of March 18, 2011, between Illumina and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
|
10-Q
|
000-30361
|
4.1
|
|
5/4/2011
|
|||||||
|
+10.1
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Illumina and each of its directors and executive officers
|
10-Q
|
000-30361
|
10.55
|
|
7/25/2008
|
|||||||
|
+10.2
|
Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement between Illumina and Jay T Flatley, dated October 22, 2008
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.33
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|||||||
|
+10.3
|
Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement between Illumina and each of its executive officers
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.34
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|||||||
|
+10.4
|
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated through February 2, 2012
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.4
|
|
2/24/2012
|
|||||||
|
+10.5
|
2005 Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated through May 29, 2013
|
S-8
|
333-190322
|
4.5
|
|
8/2/2013
|
|
||||||
|
+10.6
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.6
|
|
2/24/2012
|
|||||||
|
+10.7
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.7
|
|
2/24/2012
|
|||||||
|
+10.8
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Employees under 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.8
|
|
2/24/2012
|
|||||||
|
+10.9
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employees under 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.9
|
|
2/24/2012
|
|||||||
|
+10.10
|
New Hire Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated through October 28, 2009
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.7
|
|
2/26/2010
|
|
||||||
|
10.11
|
License Agreement, effective as of May 6, 1998, between Tufts University and Illumina
|
10-Q
|
000-30361
|
10.5
|
|
5/3/2007
|
|
||||||
86
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS — (Continued)
|
|||||||||||||
|
+10.12
|
The Solexa Unapproved Company Share Option Plan
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
99.3
|
|
11/26/2007
|
|
||||||
|
+10.13
|
The Solexa Share Option Plan for Consultants
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
99.4
|
|
11/26/2007
|
|
||||||
|
+10.14
|
Solexa Limited Enterprise Management Incentive Plan
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
99.5
|
|
11/26/2007
|
|
||||||
|
+10.15
|
Amended and Restated Solexa 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.25
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|
||||||
|
+10.16
|
Amended and Restated Solexa 1992 Stock Option Plan
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.26
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|
||||||
|
10.17
|
License Agreement, dated June 24, 2002, between Dade Behring Marburg GmbH and Illumina (with certain confidential portions omitted)
|
S-3/A
|
333-111496
|
10.23
|
|
3/2/2004
|
|
||||||
|
10.18
|
Non-exclusive License Agreement, dated January 24, 2002, between Amersham Biosciences Corp. and Illumina (with certain confidential portions omitted)
|
S-3/A
|
333-111496
|
10.24
|
|
3/2/2004
|
|
||||||
|
10.19
|
Amended and Restated Lease between BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC and Illumina for the 9885 Towne Centre Drive property, dated January 26, 2007
|
10-Q
|
000-30361
|
10.41
|
|
5/3/2007
|
|
||||||
|
10.20
|
Lease between BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC and Illumina for the 9865 Towne Centre Drive property, dated January 26, 2007
|
10-Q
|
000-30361
|
10.42
|
|
5/3/2007
|
|
||||||
|
10.21
|
Settlement and Release Agreement between Affymetrix, Inc. and Illumina, dated January 9, 2008
|
10-K
|
000-30361
|
10.44
|
|
2/26/2008
|
|
||||||
|
10.22
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedge Transaction, dated February 12, 2007, by and between Illumina and Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
10.1
|
|
2/16/2007
|
|
||||||
|
10.23
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedge Transaction, dated February 12, 2007, by and between Illumina and Deutsche Bank AG London
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
10.2
|
|
2/16/2007
|
|
||||||
|
10.24
|
Confirmation Issuer Warrant Transaction, dated February 12, 2007, by and between Illumina and Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
10.3
|
|
2/16/2007
|
|
||||||
|
10.25
|
Confirmation Issuer Warrant Transaction, dated February 12, 2007, by and between Illumina and Deutsche Bank AG London
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
10.4
|
|
2/16/2007
|
|
||||||
|
10.26
|
Amendment to the Confirmation of Issuer Warrant Transaction, dated February 13, 2007, by and between Illumina and Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
10.5
|
|
2/16/2007
|
|
||||||
|
10.27
|
Amendment to the Confirmation of Issuer Warrant Transaction, dated February 13, 2007, by and between Illumina and Deutsche Bank AG London
|
8-K
|
000-30361
|
10.6
|
|
2/16/2007
|
|
||||||
|
10.28
|
Amended and Restated Lease Agreement, dated March 27, 2012, between ARE-SD Region No. 32, LLC and Illumina
|
10-Q
|
000-30361
|
10.1
|
|
5/3/2012
|
|||||||
|
10.29
|
Deferred Compensation Plan, effective December 1, 2007
|
14D-9
|
005-60457
|
99(e)(6)
|
|
2/7/2012
|
|||||||
|
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of Illumina
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
||||||
87
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS — (Continued)
|
|||||||||||||
|
23.1
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
||||||
|
24.1
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page)
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
||||||
|
31.1
|
Certification of Jay T. Flatley pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
||||||
|
31.2
|
Certification of Marc A. Stapley pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
||||||
|
32.1
|
Certification of Jay T. Flatley pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
||||||
|
32.2
|
Certification of Marc A. Stapley pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
||||||
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
X
|
|||||||||||
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
X
|
|||||||||||
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
X
|
|||||||||||
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
X
|
|||||||||||
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
X
|
|||||||||||
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
X
|
|||||||||||
_______________________________________
|
+
|
Management contract or corporate plan or arrangement
|
|
Supplemental Information
No Annual Report to stockholders or proxy materials has been sent to stockholders as of the date of this report. The Annual Report to stockholders and proxy material will be furnished to our stockholders subsequent to the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and we will furnish such material to the SEC at that time.
88
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on
February 18, 2014
.
|
ILLUMINA
, I
NC.
|
||
|
|
By
|
/s/ J
AY
T. F
LATLEY
|
|
Jay T. Flatley
Chief Executive Officer
|
||
89
February 18, 2014
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jay T. Flatley and Marc A. Stapley, and each or any one of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their, his, or her substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
/s/ J
AY
T. F
LATLEY
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
Jay T. Flatley
|
||||
|
/s/ M
ARC
A. S
TAPLEY
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
Marc A. Stapley
|
||||
|
/s/ M
ICHEL
B
OUCHARD
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
Michel Bouchard
|
||||
|
/s/ W
ILLIAM
H. R
ASTETTER
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
William H. Rastetter
|
||||
|
/s/ F
RANCIS
A. D
ESOUZA
|
President and Director
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
Francis A. deSouza
|
||||
|
/s/ A. B
LAINE
B
OWMAN
|
Director
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
A. Blaine Bowman
|
||||
|
/s/ D
ANIEL
M. B
RADBURY
|
Director
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
Daniel M. Bradbury
|
||||
|
/s/ K
ARIN
E
ASTHAM
|
Director
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
Karin Eastham
|
||||
|
/s/ R
OBERT
S. E
PSTEIN
|
Director
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
Robert S. Epstein
|
||||
|
/s/ G
ERALD
M
ÖLLER
|
Director
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
Gerald Möller
|
||||
|
/s/ D
AVID
R. W
ALT
|
Director
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
David R. Walt
|
||||
|
/s/ R
OY
W
HITFIELD
|
Director
|
February 18, 2014
|
||
|
Roy Whitfield
|
||||
90
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules