INUVO, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2018
or
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from __________________ to __________________________
Commission file number:
001-32442
|
INUVO, INC.
|
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
Nevada
|
|
87-0450450
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
500 President Clinton Ave., Suite 300, Little Rock, AR
|
|
72201
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
(501) 205-8508
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
NYSE American
|
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
o
Yes
þ
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
o
Yes
þ
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
þ
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company:
|
Large accelerated filer
|
o
|
Accelerated filer
|
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
þ
|
Smaller reporting company
|
þ
|
|
Emerging growth company
|
o
|
||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has not elected to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act:
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
o
Yes
þ
No
The aggregate market value of the outstanding common stock, other than shares held by persons who may be deemed affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing sales price for the registrant’s common stock on
June 29, 2018
(the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter), as reported on the NYSE American, was approximately
$21.0 million
.
As of
March 8, 2019
, there were
32,350,906
shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. None.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page No.
|
|
Part I
|
||
|
|
||
|
Item 1.
|
Business.
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors.
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments.
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Properties.
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings.
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Part II
|
||
|
|
||
|
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data.
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures.
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other Information.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Part III
|
||
|
|
||
|
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation.
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Part IV
|
||
|
|
||
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
|
|
|
Item 16.
|
Form 10-K Summary
|
|
3
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “will,” “should,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. This report includes, among others, statements regarding our:
|
•
|
risks associated with our pending Merger;
|
|
•
|
material dependence on our relationships with Yahoo!, Google, Microsoft Online and other demand partners and risks associated with declining revenue from Yahoo!;
|
|
•
|
dependence on our financing arrangements with Western Alliance Bank, which is collateralized by our assets;
|
|
•
|
dependence on relationships with supply partners and the introduction of new products and services, which require significant investment;
|
|
•
|
the seasonality of our business and restricted cash flow during seasonal low periods;
|
|
•
|
dependence on our ability to effectively market and attract traffic to our sites;
|
|
•
|
risks associated with our failure to adhere to the covenants and restrictions in our grant agreement with the state of Arkansas;
|
|
•
|
need to keep pace with technology changes;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations of quarterly financial results and the trading price of our common stock;
|
|
•
|
vulnerability to interruptions of services;
|
|
•
|
dependence on key personnel;
|
|
•
|
vulnerability to regulatory and legal uncertainties and our ability to comply with applicable laws and regulations;
|
|
•
|
need to protect our intellectual property;
|
|
•
|
vulnerability to publishers who could fabricate clicks;
|
|
•
|
vulnerability to a downturn and to uncertainty in global economic conditions; and
|
|
•
|
the dilutive impact to our stockholders from outstanding restricted stock grants, options and convertible securities.
|
These forward-looking statements were based on various factors and were derived utilizing numerous assumptions and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should consider the areas of risk described in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and readers should carefully review this report in its entirety, including the risks described in Item 1A - Risk Factors appearing in this report.
Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and you should not rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business.
OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
Unless specifically set forth to the contrary, when used in this report the terms "Inuvo," the “Company,” "we," "us," "our" and similar terms refer to Inuvo, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its subsidiaries. When used in this report, “
2017
” means the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017
, "
2018
" means the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2018
, and “
2019
” means the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2019
. The information which appears on our corporate web site at www.inuvo.com is not part of this report. In February 2017, the Company acquired the assets and certain liabilities of a technology company, NetSeer, Inc. This acquisition will be referred to throughout the filing as the “2017 asset acquisition." The information which appears on our corporate web site at www.inuvo.com is not part of this report.
4
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Company Overview
Inuvo is a technology company that provides data-driven platforms that can automatically identify and message online audiences for any product or service across devices, channels and formats, including video, mobile, connected TV, display, social and native. These capabilities allow Inuvo’s clients to engage with their customers and prospects in a manner that drives engagement from the first contact with the consumer. Inuvo facilitates over a billion marketing messages to consumers every single month and counts among its clients numerous world-renowned names in industries that have included retail, automotive, insurance, health care, technology, telecommunications and finance. Inuvo counts among its many contractual relationships, three clients who collectively manage over 50% of all U.S. digital media budgets.
Inuvo’s solution incorporates a proprietary form of artificial intelligence, or AI, branded the IntentKey. This sophisticated machine learning technology uses interactions with Internet content as a source of information from which to predict consumer intent. The AI includes a continually updated database of over 500 million machine profiles which Inuvo utilizes to deliver highly aligned online audiences to its clients. Inuvo earns revenue when consumers view or click on its client’s messages. Inuvo’s business scales through account management activity with existing clients and by adding new clients through sales activity.
As part of Inuvo’s technology strategy, it owns a collection of websites including alot.com and earnspendlive.com, where Inuvo creates content in health, finance, travel, careers, auto, education and living categories. These sites provide the means to test Inuvo’s technologies, while also delivering high quality consumers to clients through the interaction with proprietary content in the form of images, videos, slideshows and articles.
There are many barriers to entry to Inuvo’s business that would require proficiency in large scale data center management, software development, data products, analytics, artificial intelligence, integration to the internet of things, or IOT, the relationships required to execute within the IOT and the ability to process tens of billions of transactions daily. Inuvo’s intellectual property is protected by 15 issued and 8 pending patents.
Recent Developments
On November 2, 2018, Inuvo entered into the Merger Agreement with ConversionPoint Technologies ("CPT"), ConversionPoint Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CPT (“Parent”), CPT Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“CPT Merger Sub”), and CPT Cigar Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Inuvo Merger Sub”). The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Inuvo will merge with and into Inuvo Merger Sub with Inuvo as the surviving corporation in the Inuvo Merger (the “Inuvo Merger”), and CPT merging with and into CPT Merger Sub with CPT as the surviving corporation in the CPT Merger (the “CPT Merger” and collectively with the Inuvo Merger, the “Merger”). Upon consummation of the Merger, CPT and Inuvo will be wholly-owned subsidiaries of Parent.
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger our stockholders will be entitled to receive $0.45 in cash and 0.18877 shares of Parent common stock for each share of common stock of Inuvo, and CPT’s stockholders will be entitled to receive 0.9840 shares of Parent common stock for each share of common stock of CPT. Each outstanding option to acquire a share of our common stock will be converted into an option to acquire 0.2370 shares of Parent’s common stock. In addition, unvested restricted stock units will vest in full immediately prior to consummation of the Merger and will be entitled to receive the merger consideration. No fractional shares of Parent common stock will be issued in the Merger and Parent stockholders and CPT stockholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional interests.
The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties from each party to the agreement, and each party has agreed to customary covenants, including, among others, covenants relating to (1) the conduct of the CPT’s and Inuvo’s businesses during the interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the Merger, (2) our obligations to facilitate our stockholders’ consideration of, and voting upon, the Merger Agreement and the Inuvo Merger, (3) CPT’s obligations to facilitate its stockholders’ consideration of, and voting upon, the Merger Agreement and the CPT Merger, (4) the recommendation by our Board of Directors in favor of approval of the Merger Agreement and the Inuvo Merger by our stockholders, and (5) Inuvo’s non-solicitation obligations relating to alternative business combination transactions.
5
The completion of the Merger is subject to (1) the approval of CPT’s stockholders and Inuvo’s stockholders, (2) regulatory approvals, (3) the closing of financing to the Parent of $36,000,000 (the “Financing”), (4) the approval of the listing of shares of Parent’s common stock on NASDAQ and conditional approval for listing on the TSX, (5) the delivery of customary opinions from counsel to the CPT and Inuvo to the effect that the Merger will qualify as a tax-free exchange for federal income tax purposes (6) Parent entering into separation agreements with Mr. Howe, our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Ruiz, our Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and Mr. Pisaris, our General Counsel, and (7) other customary closing conditions. Immediately following the Merger, Mr. Howe will serve as non-executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the Parent and an additional individual appointed by Inuvo shall serve on the seven member board of directors of the Parent.
The Merger Agreement contains customary termination rights for both Inuvo and CPT and further provides that (1) a termination payment of approximately $2.8 million will be payable by us to CPT in certain circumstances; and (2) a termination payment of approximately $2.8 million will be payable by CPT to Inuvo in certain circumstances, including if the Parent fails to consummate the Financing by May 31, 2019.
In addition, on November 1, 2018, Inuvo and ConversionPoint Investments, LLC., an affiliate of CPT (the "Noteholder") entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for up to $2 million pursuant to which Inuvo issued and sold a $1,000,000 principal amount 10% senior unsecured subordinated convertible promissory note ("the Subordinated Promissory Note") to the Noteholder which we are using for working capital. The terms of the Subordinated Promissory Note are described in Note 8 to the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing later in this report.
On March 1, 2019, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated November 2, 2018 (the “
Amendment
”) to (i) due to the delays in the SEC’s ability to review and declare effective securities filings because of the government shutdown, extend the outside date for New Parent to receive funding in a financing from May 31, 2019 to July 12, 2019, and extend the outside termination date for closing of the Mergers from June 30, 2019, to August 5, 2019, (ii) permit the issuances of the above described Notes and permit us to issue up to 3,272,728 shares of common stock or securities convertible into up to 3,272,728 shares of our common stock, and waive any breach of our representations, warranties, or covenants that would be caused by the stock issuance. Our exchange ratio of 0.18877 shares of New Parent common stock for each share of our common stock for the stock portion of the merger consideration is adjusted downward to account for the dilutive effect of the stock issuance, and (iii) permit us to amend our articles of incorporation to increase the amount of its authorized shares of common stock from 40,000,000 to 60,000,000.
On December 17, 2018 the Parent filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC for, among other matters, the stockholder meetings to be held by each of Inuvo and CPT. Unfortunately, as a result of the recent shutdown of the U.S. government between December 22, 2018 and January 25, 2019, the processing of this registration statement by the SEC was delayed. While all parties continue to diligently pursue its effectiveness and all actions necessary to proceed to a closing of the Merger, at this time we are unable to predict when such a closing may occur. The information which appears in this report gives no effect to the possible closing of the Merger.
Products and Services
The Inuvo digital marketplace allows advertisers and publishers the opportunity to buy and sell advertising space in real time and includes the following products and services:
|
•
|
ValidClick: A software as a service and delivery platform for publishers that offers a pay-per-click solution where advertisements are targeted to consumers based on content and behaviors.
|
|
•
|
IntentKey: A consumer intent recognition system designed to reach highly targeted mobile and desktop In-Market audiences with precision.
|
|
•
|
Digital Publishing: Branded web properties like alot.com, earnspendlive.com, search4answers.com and many more with content developed, edited and published by Inuvo in categories like health, finance, travel, entertainment, careers, education, lifestyle and automotive.
|
Key Relationships
We maintain long-standing relationships with Yahoo!, Google and Microsoft Online that provide access to hundreds of thousands of advertisers from which most of our ValidClick and Digital Publishing revenue originates. When an advertisement is clicked, we effectively sell that click to these partners who then sell it to the advertisers. We maintain multi-year service
6
contracts with these companies. We also have contracts with OpenX and AppNexus that provide access to advertisers and publishers for the IntentKey. In
2018
, these customers accounted for
92.9%
of our total revenue as compared to 92.6% in 2017.
In addition to our key customer relationships, we maintain important distribution relationships with owners and publishers of websites and mobile applications. We provide these partners with advertisements which they use to monetize their websites and mobile applications. We continuously monitor our partners' traffic with a variety of proprietary and patent protected software tools that can determine the quality of the traffic that is viewing and clicking on served advertisements.
Strategy
Our business strategy has been to develop technologies that displace intermediaries while cultivating relationships that provide access to media spend and media inventory. In this regard, we have proprietary demand and supply side technologies, consumer targeting technologies, on-page or in-app ad-unit technologies, proprietary data and data management technologies, and advertising fraud detection technologies. We have both direct and indirect relationships at some of the largest media buyers and/or consolidators in the industry. For our core business, the immediate strategy is to complement our indirect channels with more direct advertiser and publisher relationships as a way to reduce concentration risk and improve margins.
Our ability to compete requires that our technology delivers strong monetization of publisher content. To accelerate the time to market for these technologies and so as to gain competitive reconnaissance, we have developed a set of owned and operated digital properties. These websites provide the means to test advertising technology in a controlled environment which in turn reduces the time to market for the introduction of those technologies. The strategy has the added benefit of providing a high quality directly controlled source of advertising inventory which can be adapted to meet demand and supply changes in near real time.
Our industry is currently in a consolidation phase. Our business strategy aligns with this trend as it is by design an end-to-end complete approach to the value chain. We evaluate acquisition candidates as opportunities arise that have either advertisers or advertising relationships we do not possess or publishers or publishing partners with whom we do not currently have a relationship.
Our device strategy is to become screen agnostic. We will continue to develop technologies that allow us to distribute ads across any medium.
Sales and Marketing
We drive general awareness of our brands through various marketing channels including our websites, social media, blogs, public relations, trade shows and conferences. Sales and marketing for our products differs based on whether they are demand or supply facing.
The demand side of our business includes sales executives who create demand from agencies, trading desks and brands directly. Leveraging our IntentKey
technology to highlight our differentiation, our sales executives explain how we identify the most relevant content and audiences, allowing us to target these consumers when they are most prone to engage / respond / subscribe / tune-in and watch. Our product organization fulfills the business development initiatives that cement profitable relationships with programmatic demand partners, who are incorporated into our stack to drive monetization for our publishing partners.
The supply side of our business includes sales executives who sell to publishers directly. Creating differentiation, they explain our unique ability to create incremental revenue streams for publishers through our custom placements and unique approach to maximizing yield while preserving user experience.
Both demand and supply relationships require account management/campaign management, plus operations teams, who ensure that publisher implementations are successful, advertising campaigns deliver anticipated results and clients’ expectations are exceeded.
Competition
We face significant competition in our industry. Competitors continue to increase their suite of offerings across marketing channels to better compete for total advertising dollars.
7
A significant number of competitors have greater name recognition and are better capitalized than we are. Our ability to remain competitive in our market segment depends upon our ability to be innovative and to efficiently provide unique solutions to our demand and supply customers. There are no assurances we will be able to remain competitive in our markets in the future.
Technology Platforms
Our proprietary applications are constructed from established, readily available technologies. Some of the basic elements of our products are built on components from leading software and hardware providers such as Oracle, Microsoft, Sun, Dell, EMC, and Cisco, while some components are constructed from leading open source software projects such as Apache Web Server, MySQL, Java, Perl, Java and Linux. By seeking to strike the proper balance between using commercially available software and open source software, our technology expenditures are directed toward maintaining our technology platforms while minimizing third-party technology supplier costs.
We strive to build high-performance, availability and reliability into our product offerings. We safeguard against the potential for service interruptions at our third-party technology vendors by engineering controls into our critical components. We deliver our hosted solutions from facilities, geographically disbursed throughout the United States and maintain ready, on-demand services through third-party cloud providers Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services to enhance our business continuity. Our applications are monitored 24 hours a day, 365 days a year by specialized monitoring systems that aggregate alarms to a human-staffed network operations center. If a problem occurs, appropriate engineers are notified, and corrective action is taken.
Intellectual Property Rights
We own intellectual property (IP) and related IP rights that relate to our products, services and assets. Our IP portfolio includes patents, trade secrets and trademarks. We actively seek to protect our IP rights and to deter unauthorized use of our IP and other assets. While our IP rights are important to our success, our business as a whole is not significantly dependent on any single patent, trademark, or other IP right.
Our trademarks include the U.S. Federal Registration for our consumer facing brand ALOT® in the United States. Our patents include fifteen patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and eight pending patent applications.
To distinguish our products and services from our competitors’ products, we have obtained trademarks and trade names for our products. We also protect details about our processes, products, and strategies as trade secrets, keeping confidential the information that we believe provides us with a competitive advantage.
Employees
As of
February 28, 2019
, we had
60
full-time employees, none of which are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
Seasonality
Our future results of operations may be subject to fluctuation because of seasonality. Historically, in the later part of the fourth quarter and the earlier part of the first quarter we experience lower revenue due to a decline in demand for inventory on websites and apps and the recalibrating of advertiser’s marketing budgets after the holiday selling season. If we are not able to appropriately adjust to seasonal or other factors, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
History
We were incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in October 1987 and operated within the oil and gas industry. This endeavor was not profitable, and from 1993 to 1997 we had essentially no operations. In 1997 we reorganized and through 2006 we acquired a number of companies involved in advertising and internet marketing. In 2009, following the weakness in the economy, a new team was called in to assess the array of businesses that had been acquired in the preceding years and as a result between 2009 and 2011, we sold or retired eleven businesses.
In March 2012, as part of a long-term strategy, we acquired Vertro, Inc. ("Vertro"), which owns and operates the ALOT product portfolio. This acquisition included the ALOT brand, as well as a long-standing relationship with Google. In 2013, with a grant funded by the State of Arkansas, we moved the headquarters to Arkansas where we have remained.
8
In February 2017, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with NetSeer, Inc. ("NetSeer") which allowed us to advance our technology strategy while increasing both our number of advertisers and publishers. We exchanged 3,529,000 shares of Inuvo common stock and assumed approximately $6.8 million of specified liabilities in this business combination (See Note 17).
More Information
Our web site address is www.inuvo.com. We file with, or furnish to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as well as various other information. This information can be found on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. In addition, we make available free of charge through the Investor Relations page of our web site our annual reports, quarterly reports, and current reports, and all amendments to any of those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after providing such reports to the SEC.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
An investment in our common stock involves a significant degree of risk. You should not invest in our common stock unless you can afford to lose your entire investment. You should consider carefully the following risk factors and other information in this report before deciding to invest in our common stock. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected and you could lose your entire investment in our company.
The Merger is subject to closing conditions that, if not satisfied or waived in a timely manner or at all, will result in the Merger not being completed or delayed. A failure to complete or delay in completing the Merger may have an adverse effect on our businesses due to uncertainty or operating restrictions while the Merger is pending or cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
The Merger will not be completed unless all of the conditions to the Merger have been satisfied or, if permissible, waived. We cannot predict what the effect on the market price of our common stock would be if the Merger is not completed, but depending on market conditions at the time, it could result in a decline in market price. A substantial delay in completing the Merger due to the need to satisfy the conditions to closing the Merger, or the imposition of any unfavorable terms, conditions, or restrictions in obtaining a waiver from such conditions or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on the anticipated benefits of, or increase the costs associated with the Merger. In addition, we are subject to certain restrictions on the operation of our business while the Merger is pending, which could impair our ability to operate our businesses and prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the Merger. Any of these situations could also result in a decline in the market price of our common stock. Also, the uncertainty regarding whether the Merger will be completed (including uncertainty regarding whether the conditions to closing will be met) could impact our relationships with our employees, suppliers and partners. These restrictions and uncertainties could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, or results of operations and could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock or an increase in the volatility of the market prices.
We have a history of losses, and our revenues declined in 2018 from 2017 and we cannot anticipate with any degree of certainty what our revenues will be in future periods. Our working capital deficit has increased substantially at December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017.
We reported a net loss of approximately $5.9 million in 2018 as compared to a net loss of approximately $3.1 million in 2017. At December 31, 2018, we had a cash balance of approximately $229,000 and a working capital deficit of approximately $6.9 million as compared to a cash balance of approximately $4.1 million and a working capital deficit of approximately $6.2 million at December 31, 2017. As described elsewhere in this report, our industry is currently in a consolidation phase and our strategic decisions to discontinue certain non-strategic technologies in response to our changing industry involved the short-term loss of revenue and margin in anticipation of future growth and margins starting in 2019. We estimate that the revenue loss associated with this decision was $7.2 million in 2018. In addition, we are incurring certain additional costs associated with the Merger which also adversely impacts our working capital. Since our credit facility is dependent upon receivables, and we do not know when, if ever, that our revenues will return to historic levels or if we will be able to replace those lost revenues with revenues from other sources, the combination of lower credit availability and recent negative cash flows generated from operating activities introduces potential risk of operation without interruption.
We rely on three customers for a significant portion of our revenues.
We are reliant upon Yahoo!, Google and Microsoft Online for most of our revenue. During
2018
they accounted for
71.8%
,
10.1%
and
5.5%
of our revenues, respectively. In 2017, Yahoo!, Google and OpenX accounted for
66.7%
,
10.4%
and
9.4%
of our revenues. The amount of revenue we receive from
9
these customers is dependent on a number of factors outside of our control, including the amount they charge for advertisements, the depth of advertisements available from them, and their ability to display relevant ads in response to our end-user queries.
We would likely experience a significant decline in revenue and our business operations could be significantly harmed if (i) these customers do not approve our new websites, publishers and / or applications, (ii) if we or our publishers violate their guidelines or they change their guidelines, or (iii) if our contracts with these customers are terminated or expire without being renewed. In addition, if any of these preceding circumstances were to occur, we may not be able to find a suitable alternate paid search results provider or otherwise replace the lost revenues. Our contracts with each of these customers contain broad termination provisions and our Yahoo! contract expires in November 2020, our Google contract expires in February 2021 and our Microsoft Online contract expires in February 2020. The loss of any of these customers or a material change in the revenue or gross profit they generate would have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition in future periods.
We are dependent upon relationships with and the success of our supply partners.
Our supply partners are very important to our success. We must recruit and maintain partners who are able to drive traffic successfully to their websites and mobile applications, resulting in clicks on advertisements we have delivered. These partners may experience difficulty in attracting and maintaining users for a number of reasons, including competition, rapidly changing markets and technology, industry consolidation and changing consumer preferences. Further, we may not be able to further develop and maintain relationships with distribution partners. They may be able to make their own deals directly with advertisers, may view us as competitors or may find our competitors offerings more desirable. Any of these potential events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.
The success of our owned sites is dependent on our ability to acquire traffic in a profitable manner.
Our ALOT-branded websites are dependent on our ability to attract traffic in a profitable manner. We use a predictive model to calculate the rate of return for marketing campaigns, which includes estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and assumptions are not accurate, we may not be able to effectively manage our marketing decisions and could acquire traffic in an unprofitable manner. In addition, we may not be able to maintain and grow our traffic for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, acceptance of our websites by consumers, the availability of advertising to promote our websites, competition, and sufficiency of capital to purchase advertising. We advertise on search engine websites to drive traffic to our owned and operated websites. Our keyword advertising is done primarily with Google and Facebook, but also with Yahoo! and Bing. If we are unable to maintain and grow traffic to our sites in a profitable manner, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Failure to comply with the covenants and restrictions in our credit facility could impact our ability to access capital as needed.
We have a credit facility with Western Alliance Bank ("Western Alliance Bank"), the parent company of Bridge Bank, N.A. our original lender, expired in October 2018. Effective October 11, 2018, we entered into a new agreement with Western Alliance Bank which superseded the expiring facility. The new agreement may be terminated by either party at any time and has a sub-limit provision that expires on April 30, 2019. While we believe we will be able to renew with substantially similar terms and conditions, there are no assurances that we will be able to renew. In that event, our liquidity in future periods would be materially adversely impacted. In addition, the credit facility contains a number of covenants that requires us to, among other things:
|
•
|
pay fees to the lender associated with the credit facility;
|
|
•
|
maintain our corporate existence in good standing;
|
|
•
|
grant the lender a security interest in our assets;
|
|
•
|
provide financial information to the lender; and
|
|
•
|
refrain from any transfer of any of our business or property, subject to customary exceptions.
|
In the event of a breach of our covenants we cannot provide any assurance that our lender would provide a waiver or reset our covenants. A breach in our covenants could result in a default under the credit facility, and in such event Western Alliance Bank could elect to declare all borrowings outstanding, if any, to be due and payable. If this occurs and we have outstanding obligations and are not able to repay, Western Alliance Bank could require us to apply all of our available cash to repay the debt amounts and could then proceed against the underlying collateral. Should this occur, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay our debt in full, we would be able to borrow sufficient funds to refinance the debt, or that we would be able to obtain a waiver to cure any such default. In such an event, our ability to conduct our business as it is currently conducted would be in jeopardy.
10
Our business must keep pace with rapid technological change to remain competitive.
Our business operates in a market characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent new product and service announcements, enhancements, and changing customer demands. We must adapt to rapidly changing technologies and industry standards and continually improve the speed, performance, features, ease of use and reliability of our services. This includes making our products and services compatible and maintaining compatibility with multiple operating systems, desktop and mobile devices, and evolving network infrastructure. If we fail to do this, our results of operations and financial position could be adversely affected.
Our quarterly operating results can be difficult to predict and can fluctuate substantially, which could result in volatility in the price of our common stock.
Our quarterly revenues and other operating results have varied in the past and are likely to continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter. Our agreements with distribution partners and key customers do not require minimum levels of usage or payments, and our revenues therefore fluctuate based on the actual usage of our service each quarter by existing and new distribution partners. Quarterly fluctuations in our operating results also might be due to numerous other factors, including:
|
•
|
our ability to attract new distribution partners, including the length of our sales cycles, or to sell increased usage of our service to existing distribution partners;
|
|
•
|
technical difficulties or interruptions in our services;
|
|
•
|
changes in privacy protection and other governmental regulations applicable to our industry;
|
|
•
|
changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors;
|
|
•
|
the financial condition and business success of our distribution partners;
|
|
•
|
purchasing and budgeting cycles of our distribution partners;
|
|
•
|
acquisitions of businesses and products by us or our competitors;
|
|
•
|
competition, including entry into the market by new competitors or new offerings by existing competitors;
|
|
•
|
discounts offered to advertisers by upstream advertising networks;
|
|
•
|
our history of litigation;
|
|
•
|
our ability to hire, train and retain sufficient sales, client management and other personnel;
|
|
•
|
timing of development, introduction and market acceptance of new services or service enhancements by us or our competitors;
|
|
•
|
concentration of marketing expenses for activities such as trade shows and advertising campaigns;
|
|
•
|
expenses related to any new or expanded data centers; and
|
|
•
|
general economic and financial market conditions.
|
Our services may be interrupted if we experience problems with our network infrastructure
. The performance of our network infrastructure is critical to our business and reputation. Because our services are delivered solely through the internet, our network infrastructure could be disrupted by a number of factors, including, but not limited to:
|
•
|
unexpected increases in usage of our services;
|
|
•
|
computer viruses and other security issues;
|
|
•
|
interruption or other loss of connectivity provided by third-party internet service providers;
|
|
•
|
natural disasters or other catastrophic events; and
|
|
•
|
server failures or other hardware problems.
|
While we have data centers in multiple, geographically dispersed locations and active back-up and disaster recovery plans, we cannot assure you that serious interruptions will not occur in the future. If our services were to be interrupted, it could cause loss of users, customers and business partners, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.
We depend on key personnel, the loss of whom could harm our business.
Our success depends in part on the retention of personnel critical to our business operations. Loss of key personnel may result in disruption of operations, loss of key business relationships or expertise, additional recruiting and training costs, and diminished anticipated benefits of acquisitions. Our future success is substantially dependent on the continued service of our key senior management. We have experienced difficulty from time to time in attracting or retaining the personnel necessary to support the growth of our business, and we may experience similar difficulties in the future.
Regulatory and legal uncertainties could harm our business.
While there are currently relatively few laws or regulations directly applicable to internet-based commerce or commercial search activity, there is increasing awareness of such activity and interest from state and federal lawmakers in regulating these services. New regulation of activities in which we are involved or
11
the extension of existing laws and regulations to internet-based services could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position.
Failure to comply with federal, state and international privacy and data security laws and regulations, or the expansion of current or the enactment of new privacy and data security laws or regulations, could adversely affect our business.
A variety of federal, state and international laws and regulations govern the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of consumer data. In addition, various federal, state and foreign legislative and regulatory bodies may expand current or enact new laws regarding privacy matters. For example, recently there have been Congressional hearings and increased attention to the capture and use of location-based information relating to users of smartphones and other mobile devices, and internationally the European Union’s new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) went into effect in May 2018. We have posted privacy policies and practices concerning the collection, use and disclosure of subscriber data on our websites and applications. The existing and soon to be enacted privacy and data security related laws and regulations are evolving and subject to potentially differing interpretations. Several Internet companies have incurred penalties for failing to abide by the representations made in their privacy policies and practices. In addition, several states have adopted legislation that requires businesses to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect sensitive personal information and to provide notice to consumers in the event of a security breach. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with our posted privacy policies or with any data-related consent orders, FTC requirements or orders or other federal, state or international privacy or consumer protection-related laws, including the GDPR, regulations or industry self-regulatory principles could result in claims, proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others or other liabilities, which could adversely affect our business.
We may face third party intellectual property infringement claims that could be costly to defend and result in the loss of significant rights.
From time to time third parties have asserted infringement claims against us including copyright, trademark and patent infringement, among other things. While we believe that we have defenses to these types of claims under appropriate trademark laws, we may not prevail in our defenses to any intellectual property infringement claims. In addition, we may not be adequately insured for any judgments awarded in connection with any litigation. Any such claims and resulting litigation could subject us to significant liability for damages or result in the invalidation of our proprietary rights, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Even if we were to prevail, these claims could be time-consuming, expensive to defend, and could result in the diversion of management's time and attention.
We are subject to risks from publishers who could fabricate clicks either manually or technologically.
Our business involves the establishment of relationships with website owners and publishers. In exchange for their consumer traffic, we provide an advertising placement service and share a portion of the revenue we collect with that website publisher. Although we have click fraud detection software in place, we cannot guarantee that we will identify all fraudulent clicks or be able to recover funds distributed for fabricated clicks. This risk could materially impact our ability to borrow, our cash flow and the stability of our business.
Our business is seasonal and our financial results may vary significantly from period to period.
Our future results of operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year because of numerous factors, including seasonality. Historically, in the later part of the fourth quarter and the earlier part of the first quarter we experience lower Revenue Per Click (“RPC”) due to a decline in demand for inventory on website and app space and the recalibrating of advertiser’s marketing budgets after the holiday selling season. If we are not able to appropriately adjust to seasonal or other factors, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
A downturn or uncertainty in global economic conditions may have a significant negative effect on our access to credit and our ability to raise capital and may impact our business, operating results or financial condition.
A future downturn or uncertainty in global economic conditions, may result in significant reductions in, and heightened credit quality standards for, available capital and liquidity from banks and other providers of credit and substantial reductions and/or fluctuations in equity and currency values worldwide, which may make it difficult for us to raise additional capital or obtain additional credit, when needed, on acceptable terms or at all. Moreover, deteriorated economic conditions, or the threat of a prolonged recessionary period, may cause disruptions and volatility in global financial markets, increased rates of default and bankruptcy and have a negative impact on the levels of consumer spending. These macroeconomic developments could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition in a number of ways. For example, current or potential customers, such as advertisers, may delay or decrease spending with us or may not pay us or may delay paying us for previously performed services. In addition, if consumer spending decreases, this may result in fewer clicks on our advertisers’ ads displayed on our or our partner websites.
Failure to comply with the covenants and restrictions in our grant agreement with the State of Arkansas could result in the repayment of a portion of the grant, which we may not be able to repay or finance on favorable terms.
In January 2013, we
12
entered into an agreement with the State of Arkansas whereby we were granted
$1,750,000
for the relocation of the Company to Arkansas and for the purchase of equipment. The grant was contingent upon us having at least
50
full-time equivalent permanent positions within
four
years, maintaining at least
50
full-time equivalent permanent positions for the following six years and paying those positions an average total compensation of $90,000 per year. As of
December 31, 2018
, we had
39
full-time employees located in Arkansas. Failure to meet the requirements of the grant after the initial four-year period, may require us to repay a portion of the grant, up to but not to exceed the full amount of the grant. At December 31, 2018, we accrued a contingent liability of $55,000 for the lower than required employment. Should the lower than required employment continue, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay our grant in full, we would be able to borrow sufficient funds to refinance the grant, or that we would be able to obtain a waiver to cure any such default. In such an event, our ability to conduct our business as it is currently conducted would be in jeopardy.
Significant dilution will occur if outstanding convertible securities options are exercised or restricted stock unit grants vest.
As of
December 31, 2018
, we had stock options outstanding to purchase a total of
264,246
shares with exercise prices ranging from
$0.56
to
$3.70
per share, with a weighted average exercise price of
$2.84
. We also had
1,571,864
restricted stock units outstanding. If outstanding stock options are exercised or restricted stock units vest, dilution will occur to our stockholders, which may be significant. In addition, in relation to a debt security, under certain circumstances, they have the right to convert their debt to Inuvo stock. See Note 2 and Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Our corporate headquarters are located in Little Rock, Arkansas where we entered into a five-year agreement to lease office space on October 1, 2015. The lease is for 12,245 square feet. We also have office space in San Jose, CA where in June 2017, we entered into a five-year agreement to lease 4,801 square feet of office space.
In addition to our office space, we maintain data center operations in third-party collocation facilities in Little Rock, AR and San Jose, CA.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Litigation related to the mergers that could prevent or delay the completion of the mergers and/or result in the payment of damages following the completion of the mergers.
On December 19, 2018 and December 20, 2018, Peter D’Arcy and Morris Akerman, both of whom claim to be stockholders of Inuvo, commenced separate putative class action lawsuits, captioned D’Arcy v. Inuvo, Inc. et al., No. 1:18-cv-02023-UNA, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware; and Akerman v. Inuvo, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-cv-02407, in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The two lawsuits each name Inuvo and the members of Inuvo’s board of directors as defendants. The D’Arcy action also names ConversionPoint Technologies, Inc. and various entities created to effect the merger as defendants. The complaints filed in the lawsuits assert claims under Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act challenging the adequacy of the disclosures relating to the merger transactions made in a joint consent solicitation statement/prospectus.
On December 21, 2018, Domenic Spagnolo, another purported stockholder of Inuvo, filed a substantially similar lawsuit, captioned Spagnolo v. Inuvo, Inc. et al., No. 1:18-cv-12099, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. This complaint similarly challenged the adequacy of disclosure under the same sections of the Exchange Act against Inuvo and its directors.
Each of the foregoing lawsuits seeks, among other relief, an injunction preventing the parties from consummating the merger transactions, damages in the event the merger transactions are consummated, and an award of attorneys’ fees. Inuvo believes the claims asserted in the lawsuits are without merit. Inuvo intends to vigorously contest the lawsuits. On February 4, 2019, Inuvo filed a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative to stay, the Akerman and Spagnolo action pending the resolution of the first- filed D’Arcy case. Then, on March 4, 2019, we filed a second motion to dismiss the Spagnolo action based on a failure to state a claim under the law. In the Akerman action, no hearings have had been scheduled. In the Spagnolo action, the Court ordered Plaintiff Spagnolo an opportunity to amend his complaint in response to the motion to dismiss or, or, alternatively, to oppose the motion to dismiss by March 25, 2019. If Plaintiff Spagnolo files an amended complaint, we will have three weeks to respond. Further, Plaintiff Spagnolo filed
13
a preliminary injunction, seeking to enjoin a shareholder vote on the merger. Per court order, the Company responded to the preliminary injunction on March 1, 2019. Plaintiff Spagnolo was ordered to reply by March 8, 2019.
On January 4, 2019 and January 8, 2019, respectively, two more purported stockholders of Inuvo, Adam Franchi and Les Thomas, filed substantially similar putative class action lawsuits, captioned Franchi v. Inuvo, Inc. et al., No. A-19-787021-C and Thomas v. Inuvo, Inc. et al., No. T19-57 , in the District Court of the State of Nevada in the County of Clark. These complaints also name Inuvo and the members of Inuvo’s board of directors as defendants. The Franchi action also names ConversionPoint Technologies, Inc. and various entities created to effect the merger as defendants. Both complaints assert breach of fiduciary duties claims arising from the adequacy of the disclosures relating to the merger transactions made in a joint consent solicitation statement/prospectus, and both complaints seek an injunction preventing the parties from consummating the merger transactions, damages in the event the merger transactions are consummated, and an award of attorneys’ fees.
Inuvo believes the claims asserted in these most recent lawsuits are similarly without merit. Inuvo intends to vigorously contest these lawsuits. On January 25, 2018, the Thomas plaintiff filed a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin the merger. A hearing on the preliminary injunction is scheduled for March 18, 2019. On February 5 and 14, 2019, Inuvo filed motions to dismiss, or in the alternative to stay, the Franchi and Thomas actions, respectively, pending the resolution of the first-filed D’Arcy action. A hearing on the Franchi motion is yet to be scheduled. A hearing on the Thomas motion is scheduled for April 1, 2019.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE American under the symbol "INUV."
As of
March 8, 2019
, the last reported sale price of the common stock on NYSE American was
$1.28
and there were approximately
407
stockholders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
We have not declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock since our inception. Under Nevada law, we are prohibited from paying dividends if the distribution would result in our company not being able to pay its debts as they become due in the normal course of business if our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to pay the dividends, or if we were to be dissolved at the time of distribution to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution. Our board of directors has complete discretion on whether to pay dividends subject to compliance with applicable Nevada law. Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, the frequency, and the amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant. While our board of directors will make any future decisions regarding dividends, as circumstances surrounding us change, it currently does not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None, except as previously reported.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None
14
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
.
Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Company Overview
Inuvo is a technology company that provides data-driven platforms that can automatically identify and message online audiences for any product or service across devices, channels and formats, including video, mobile, connected TV, display, social and native. These capabilities allow Inuvo’s clients to engage with their customers and prospects in a manner that drives engagement from the first contact with the consumer. Inuvo facilitates over a billion marketing messages to consumers every single month and counts among its clients numerous world-renowned names in industries that have included retail, automotive, insurance, health care, technology, telecommunications and finance. Inuvo counts among its many contractual relationships, three clients who collectively manage over 50% of all U.S. digital media budgets.
Inuvo’s solution incorporates a proprietary form of artificial intelligence, or AI, branded the IntentKey. This sophisticated machine learning technology uses interactions with Internet content as a source of information from which to predict consumer intent. The AI includes a continually updated database of over 500 million machine profiles which Inuvo utilizes to deliver highly aligned online audiences to its clients. Inuvo earns revenue when consumers view or click on its client’s messages. Inuvo’s business scales through account management activity with existing clients and by adding new clients through sales activity.
As part of Inuvo’s technology strategy, it owns a collection of websites like alot.com and earnspendlive.com, where Inuvo creates content in health, finance, travel, careers, auto, education and living categories. These sites provide the means to test Inuvo’s technologies, while also delivering high quality consumers to clients through the interaction with proprietary content in the form of images, videos, slideshows and articles.
There are many barriers to entry to Inuvo’s business that would require proficiency in large scale data center management, software development, data products, analytics, artificial intelligence, integration to the internet of things, or IOT, the relationships required to execute within the IOT and the ability to process tens of billions of transactions daily. Inuvo’s intellectual property is protected by 15 issued and 8 pending patents.
2018 Overview
In 2018, we executed on the three goals we had set for the company when we made the decision to purchase NetSeer in the prior year: 1) to bring artificial intelligence to digital marketing; 2) to re-imagine how consumer information is collected and used for marketing purposes; and 3) to expand our marketing technology footprint beyond search advertising. As is the case with most acquisitions, there were components of the NetSeer business that were aligned with these strategies and some that were not.
We had gained sufficient experience with the NetSeer assets to begin re-engineering the business so as to align with these strategic goals. Our first decision was to focus all of our attention on the most differentiated component of the asset which was the artificial intelligence technology being used to manufacture this incredibly rich source of consumer prospecting information (Data). This decision had implications that included: a) discontinuing certain non-strategic technologies including a proprietary marketing platform; b) finding a suitable substitute(s) marketing platform for the execution of the data; and c) raising capital to fund the strategy and working capital needs throughout the re-engineering period which we estimated would take the entire fiscal 2018 year.
There was a trade-off associated with the decision to discontinue the non-strategic technologies which involved the short-term loss of revenue and margin in anticipation of future growth and margins starting in 2019. We estimate that the revenue loss associated with this decision was $7.2 million in 2018. The attrition of revenue occurred faster than we had expected and as a result, we accelerated the elimination of expenses and resources associated with the discontinued technologies including the elimination of approximately 20 full time employees. We raised approximately $2.1 million (net) in May of 2018 to ensure continuity of the strategy.
15
In January of 2019, we completed the re-engineering with the announcement of the integration of the IntentKey into the world’s largest independent marketplace for digital advertising, AppNexus which was the solution to the problem identified in b) above. This means our Data is now executable on one of the world’s best advertising platforms used by thousands of potential Inuvo clients. Early results from new and existing clients suggest both better results and a materially improved competitive positioning as evidenced by a strong pipeline of RFP’s. We are convinced that the technology we have and the integration we have engineered is a game changing paradigm shift for an industry burdened by a plethora of consumer data privacy and technology complications which we have now re-imagined with the IntentKey data platform and doing so faster, better and cheaper.
Heading into 2019, we are effectively a business with two data management platforms, the IntentKey and ValidClick. In both cases, we leverage these platforms to consummate a transaction between consumer and advertiser. This means we now can serve clients across numerous marketing channels with enviable enabling relationships like AppNexus, Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft Online. While the ValidClick business was effectively flat year-over-year, this was more the consequence of limited resources and their allocation towards strategy than it was opportunity. Now that we are past the investment stage with the IntentKey, we expect the ValidClick business to continue to grow in what remains the largest single marketing spend category.
The foundation, which was laid in 2018, was the catalyst for the announced Merger with ConversionPoint Technologies in November of 2018. The combination of Inuvo’s front end marketing technologies with ConversionPoint’s back-end eCommerce engagement technologies represent the next wave of digital technology consolidation and we will be among the first to execute on this opportunity. This new positioning within eCommerce technology combined with a stronger product value proposition and more capital with greater operating scale forms the foundation of our excitement for the Merger.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported periods. The more critical accounting estimates include estimates related to revenue recognition and accounts receivable allowances. We also have other key accounting policies, which involve the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that are significant to understanding our results, which are described in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements for
2018
and
2017
appearing elsewhere in this report.
The estimates and assumptions that management makes affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates and assumptions used are based upon management’s regular evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. We regularly evaluate estimates and assumptions related to allowances for sale chargebacks, allowances for doubtful accounts, goodwill and purchased intangible asset valuations, lives of intangible assets, deferred income tax asset valuation allowances, contingent liabilities, including the Arkansas grant contingency, and stock compensation. Though actual results may differ from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements, in the past such differences have been immaterial. Because our procedures require review of estimates and assumptions throughout the fiscal year, and differences between the estimates and assumptions and the actual results have been minor and immaterial, we have no reason not to believe the accuracy of our estimates and assumptions will continue into future quarters.
Results of Operations
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
|
Net Revenue
|
$
|
73,330,642
|
|
$
|
79,554,493
|
|
$
|
(6,223,851
|
)
|
(7.8
|
%)
|
|||
|
Cost of Revenue
|
29,921,482
|
|
36,669,543
|
|
(6,748,061
|
)
|
(18.4
|
%)
|
||||||
|
Gross Profit
|
$
|
43,409,160
|
|
$
|
42,884,950
|
|
524,210
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
||||
|
Marketing Cost (TAC)
|
$
|
31,852,190
|
|
$
|
28,578,401
|
|
3,273,789
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
||||
|
Gross Profit adjusted for Marketing Cost (TAC)
|
$
|
11,556,970
|
|
$
|
14,306,549
|
|
(2,749,579
|
)
|
(19.2
|
%)
|
||||
Net revenue
16
Net revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2018
was $73.3 million compared to $79.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2017
. The decline in net revenue was primarily due to the strategic decision to discontinue non-strategic technologies including a proprietary marketing platform. We estimate that the revenue loss associated with this decision was approximately $7.2 million in 2018. In addition, we experienced lower monetization for our inventory from our largest Demand partner. We have not seen an appreciable change in monetization for our inventory and we do not know whether monetization will return to former levels.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue is primarily generated by payments to website publishers and app developers that host advertisements we serve and to ad exchanges that provide access to supply inventory where we serve advertisements. The decrease in the cost of revenue in 2018 compared to 2017 is due primarily to lower revenue and to the loss of revenue associated with the discontinuation of non-strategic revenue including a proprietary marketing platform discussed in the
Net Revenue
section.
Operating Expenses
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
|
Marketing costs (TAC)
|
$
|
31,852,190
|
|
$
|
28,578,401
|
|
$
|
3,273,789
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|||
|
Compensation
|
8,524,476
|
|
10,200,117
|
|
(1,675,641
|
)
|
(16.4
|
%)
|
||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
8,502,874
|
|
8,342,906
|
|
159,968
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Operating expenses
|
$
|
48,879,540
|
|
$
|
47,121,424
|
|
$
|
1,758,116
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|||
Operating expenses increased by $1.8M or 3.7% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017.
Marketing costs include those expenses required to attract an audience to our owned web properties. Marketing costs increased 11.5% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in marketing costs was partially due to adjusting traffic acquisition campaigns as a result of lower monetization experienced in the second half of the year.
Compensation expense decreased 16.4% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 due primarily to lower headcount. Our total employment, both full-time and part-time, was 66 at December 31, 2018 compared to 89 at the same time last year.
Selling, general and administrative costs were $8.5 million, an increase of 1.9% over 2017. Among the higher 2018 expenses compared to 2017 were professional fees, IT costs and depreciation and amortization expense, offset by lower corporate expenses, travel and entertainment expenses and facility and marketing expenses.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, net, which represents interest expense on the bank credit facility, capital lease obligations and notes payable, was higher in 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 primarily due to higher interest rates on the credit line this year compared to last year.
Income tax benefit
In 2017, we recognized an income tax benefit of
$1,498,076
. due to the passing of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017. The new law reduced corporate income tax rates from 35% to 21%. As a result, the deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded in the consolidated balance sheet were revalued at the new tax rates. Both the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities were reduced. The decrease in the deferred tax liability resulted in the one-time tax benefit.
Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations
Certain of our subsidiaries previously operated in the European Union ("EU"). Though operations ceased in 2009, statutory requirements made it necessary to have a continued presence in the EU for varying terms until November 2015. Profits and losses generated from the remaining assets and liabilities are accounted for as discontinued operations.
17
In the third quarter of 2016, our petition with the UK (United Kingdom) Companies House to strike off and dissolve the remaining subsidiary in the EU was approved. As of
December 31, 2017
, we recorded a net income of
$1,109
due primarily to the adjustment of certain accrued liabilities. No further charges or adjustments are expected.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On October 11, 2018, we entered into the Amended and Restated Business Financing Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Financing Agreement”) with Western Alliance Bank. The Amended and Restated Financing Agreement, which is secured by all of our assets, superseded in its entirety the prior Business Financing Agreement, as amended, that we entered into on March 1, 2012 with Bridge Bank, N.A. which is now owned by Western Alliance Bank. The Amended and Restated Financing Agreement does not have a term and either party may terminate upon notice to the other party. As a result of the amended terms of our lending relationship with Western Alliance Bank, we have additional access to credit (See Note 6 in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report).
During the third quarter of 2017, we filed an S-3 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to replace an existing, expiring S-3 "shelf" registration statement, which permits us to offer and sell up to
$15 million
of our securities from time to time in one or more offerings. In May 2018, we took down from this shelf registration statement approximately $2.3 million in the underwritten public offering. The underwritten public offering was
2,860,000
shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $.
70
per share and an additional
429,000
shares to cover overallotments in connection with the offering. The net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable was approximately
$2.0 million
.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, our revenues declined 7.8% from the prior year. The lower revenue in 2018 is principally responsible for our $5.9 million net loss in 2018. Of the $5.9 million loss, approximately $4.1 million was depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense. Further, we had roughly $500 thousand of merger related costs and an additional $175 thousand dollars in other non-cash accruals. Since our credit facility is dependent upon receivables, and we do not know when, if ever, that our revenues will return to historic levels or if we will be able to replace those lost revenues with revenues from other sources, the combination of lower credit availability and recent negative cash flows generated from operating activities introduces potential risk of losing operation without interruption. As described earlier in this report, on November 2, 2018, we entered into the Merger Agreement. At the closing the Merger, which is subject to a number of conditions precedent, the Company will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of CPT. In addition, on November 1, 2018, we borrowed $1 million from an affiliate of CPT which we are using for working capital, and on November 2, 2018, four directors of the Company lent us $62,500 each, for an aggregate of $250,000, to cover certain costs associated with the pending Merger. In March 2019, we sold an aggregate of $1,440,000 Original Issue Discount Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Notes due September 1, 2020 in a private placement and received $1,200,000 in proceeds which we are using for working capital. Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement and the credit facility with the additional borrowing, together with this additional capital raise, we believe we will have sufficient cash and credit to operate until the Merger closes. There are no assurances we will be successful in our efforts to generate revenues, report profitable operations or close the Merger in which case we would need to find additional sources of credit and make substantial reductions to operating expense.
Cash Flows - Operating
Net cash used in operating activities was
$2,100,167
during
2018
. We reported a net loss of
$5,890,832
, which included non-cash expenses; depreciation and amortization of
$3,181,619
and stock-based compensation of
$915,469
. The change in operating assets and liabilities was a net use of cash of
$334,674
primarily due to a decrease in the accounts payable balance by
$4,114,512
, partially offset by a decrease in the accounts receivable balance by
$4,058,591
. Our terms are such that we generally collect receivables prior to paying trade payables. Media sales, which are part of the business acquired in 2017, typically have slower payment terms than the terms of related payables.
During
2017
, cash used in operating activities was
$1,148,281
. We reported a net loss of
$3,057,700
, which included a deferred income tax benefit of
$1,406,600
due to the change in tax legislation. Additional non-cash expenses included the non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization of
$3,029,801
and stock-based compensation expenses of
$1,279,807
. The change in operating assets and liabilities was a net use of cash of
$1,396,224
.
Cash Flows - Investing
Net cash used in investing activities was
$1,634,919
and
$1,322,930
for
2018
and
2017
, respectively. Cash used in investing activities in both years has primarily consisted of capitalized internal development costs.
18
Cash Flows - Financing
Net cash used in financing activities was
$120,644
during
2018
net of repayments on our revolving line of credit and capital leases. In addition, in May 2018, we sold approximately $2.3 million of common shares in the underwritten public offering. The net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable was approximately
$2.0 million
. On November 1, 2018, we borrowed $1 million from an affiliate of CPT which we are using for working capital, and on November 2, 2018, four directors of the Company lent us $62,500 each, for an aggregate of $250,000, to cover certain costs associated with the pending Merger.
During
2017
, net cash used in financing activities was
$2,609,093
which largely consisted of proceeds from the revolving credit facility used to pay off the debt acquired in the NetSeer asset acquisition.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
December 31, 2018
, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors. The term "off-balance sheet arrangement" generally means any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement to which an entity unconsolidated with us is a party, under which we have any obligation arising under a guarantee contract, derivative instrument or variable interest or a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to such entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Our consolidated financial statements begin on page F-1 at the end of this annual report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC rules and regulations, and to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls will prevent all errors and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the control. The design of any systems of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
19
Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of
December 31, 2018
, the end of the period covered by this report, our management concluded their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. As of the evaluation date, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that we maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC rules and regulations, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
•
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
|
|
•
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
|
|
•
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
Because of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2018
. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 2013 Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework
. Based upon this assessment, our management concluded that as of
December 31, 2018
our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation that occurred during the year ended
December 31, 2018
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
.
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table provides information on our current executive officers and directors:
20
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard K. Howe
|
56
|
Executive Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; Class I Director
|
||
|
Wallace D. Ruiz
|
67
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
|
||
|
John B. Pisaris, Esq.
|
53
|
General Counsel
|
||
|
Don Walker “Trey” Barrett III
|
54
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
||
|
Charles D. Morgan
|
76
|
Class III director
|
||
|
Gordon J. Cameron
|
54
|
Class I director
|
||
|
G. Kent Burnett
|
74
|
Class II director
|
||
|
Patrick Terrell
|
64
|
Class III director
|
||
Richard K. Howe.
Mr. Howe has been a member of our board of directors since November 2008, and has served as Executive Chairman of the board since March 2012 and as our Chief Executive Officer since December 2012. Previously, he served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from November 2008 until March 2012. Prior to joining Inuvo, Mr. Howe served as Chief Marketing, Strategy and M&A Officer at the billion dollar multi-channel marketing services leader Acxiom Corporation (NasdaqGS: ACXM) where, since 2004, he led the company's transition to online marketing services, the expansion into China and the development of the big data consulting services group. From 2001 to 2004, he served as general manager of Global Marketing Services (GMS) at Fair Isaac & Company (NYSE: FICO), a leading provider of analytics products and services where he drove the company's online initiatives. Between 1999 and 2001, Mr. Howe started, grew and sold private Internet search innovator, ieWild. Mr. Howe has over his career led the acquisition, merger or divestiture of a dozen companies on three continents worth many hundreds of millions of dollars to shareholders. Mr. Howe earned a bachelor’s degree with distinction in engineering from Concordia University, Canada, and he earned his master’s degree in engineering from McGill University, Canada.
Wallace D. Ruiz.
Mr. Ruiz has served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2010. From 2005 until April 2009, Mr. Ruiz was Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of SRI Surgical Express, Inc. (Nasdaq: STRC), a Tampa, Florida provider of outsourced sterilization and supply chain management services to healthcare providers. From 1995 until 2004 he was Chief Financial Officer of Novadigm, Inc. (Nasdaq: NVDM), a developer and worldwide marketer of enterprise infrastructure software that was acquired by Hewlett-Packard Company in 2004. Since March 2018 he has been a member of the board of directors of Truli Technologies, Inc. (OTCPink: TRLI). Mr. Ruiz received a B.S. in Computer Science from St. John’s University and a M.B.A. in Accounting and Finance from Columbia University. Mr. Ruiz is a Certified Public Accountant.
John B. Pisaris
. Mr. Pisaris has served as our General Counsel since March 2012 following our acquisition of Vertro. He served as general counsel of Vertro from October 2004 until March 2012. From February 2004 to September 2004, Mr. Pisaris served as vice president of legal of Vertro, and prior to that was a partner at Porter Wright Morris& Arthur, LLP, a law firm, from January 2002 to January 2004.
Don Walker “Trey” Barrett, III.
Mr. Barrett joined Inuvo in February 2010 as Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Business Development, and was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in February 2013. Prior to joining Inuvo, Mr. Barnett served as Acxiom Corporation's Director of Interactive Media Products overseeing the innovation and development of the Relevance-X product line. With over 25 years of data-driven direct marketing experience, he has been involved in several successful business start-ups in the direct and interactive marketing industries. Mr. Barnett earned a bachelor’s degrees in Marketing and Economics from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville.
Charles D. Morgan.
Mr. Morgan has been a member of our board of directors since June 2009. Since 2008, he has been the Chief Executive Officer of First Orion Corp., a private company that developed and markets PrivacyStar, an application that helps protect the mobile phone users' privacy. He also serves as a member and is the past Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Hendrix College. Mr. Morgan has extensive experience managing and investing in both private and public companies including Acxiom Corporation (NasdaqGS: ACXM), an information services company he helped grow from an early stage company to $1.4 billion in revenues during his tenure as Chief Executive Officer from 1975 to 2008. Mr. Morgan has served on the board and in various leadership roles with the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) throughout his career, serving in 2001 as chairman of the DMA board. Mr. Morgan was employed by IBM as a systems engineer for six years prior to joining Acxiom, and he holds a mechanical engineering degree from the University of Arkansas.
21
Gordon J. Cameron
. Mr. Cameron has been a member of our board of directors since November 2016. He is a business transformation executive with three decades of success in growing businesses while managing risk. Mr. Cameron is currently an Executive Vice President in Retail Lending at PNC Financial Services, one of the largest diversified financial services institutions in the United States, where he serves as a credit risk executive, a position he has held since 2008. Prior to PNC Financial Services, Mr. Cameron was the Chief Credit Officer, Retail and Small Business Lending, at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce from 2005 to 2008. Mr. Cameron was the Chief Scientist Transaction Analytics, Global Account Management Solutions at Fair Isaac Corporation FICO from 2001 to 2005. Prior to his tenure with Fair Isaac Corporation, Mr. Cameron held executive positions at IeWild Inc., HNC Software Inc., Advanta National Bank/Fleet, The Cambell Group LTD and Fidelity Bank N.A. Mr. Cameron received a MBA from Widener University School of Management and a B.S. in Finance from Pennsylvania State University.
G. Kent Burnett
.
Mr. Burnett has been a member of our board of directors since November 2016. He is a retired technology and ecommerce executive. Mr. Burnett joined Dillard’s, Inc., one of the nation’s largest fashion retailers, in 1979. Mr. Burnett held various executive level technology positions at Dillard’s, including Chief Information Officer, Western Division Chairman and from 2009 to 2016 was Vice President of Technology and Ecommerce. Prior to joining Dillard’s Mr. Burnett held various marketing, technology and engineering positions with IBM. Since 2012 he has been a member of the Board of Directors of First Orion Corp., a phone call protection and data provider, and from February 2012 to April 2013 he served as a member of the Board of Directors of Acumen Brands, an ecommerce retailer. Mr. Burnett received his undergraduate degree from the University of Arkansas.
Patrick Terrell.
Mr. Terrell has been a member of our board of directors since January 2013. Since 2002 and 2004, respectively, Mr. Terrell has been the managing member of both PatRick Investments, LLC and Terrell Group Management, private equity and real estate investment companies. He also serves on the board of directors of Routeware Inc. Mr. Terrell served as founder and CEO of Leading Technology, a $300 million per year manufacturer of personal computers. Additionally, he founded Byte Shops Northwest, which serviced personal computers, and grew to $50 million in annual revenues. Mr. Terrell attended Oregon State University.
There are no family relationships between any of the directors.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of honest and ethical conduct in running our business efficiently, serving our stockholders interests and maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. To further this commitment, we have adopted our Code of Conduct and Business Code of Ethics, which applies to all our directors, officers and employees. To assist in its governance, our board has formed two standing committees composed entirely of independent directors, Audit and Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation. A discussion of each committee’s function is set forth below. Additionally, we have adopted and published to all employees our Whistleblower Notice establishing procedures by which any employee may bring to the attention of our Audit Committee any disclosure regarding accounting, internal control or other auditing issues affecting our company or any improper activities of any officer or employee. Disclosure may be made anonymously.
Our bylaws, the charters of each board committee, the independent status of a majority of our board of directors, our Code of Conduct and Business Code of Ethics and our Whistleblower Notice provide the framework for our corporate governance. Copies of our bylaws, committee charters, Code of Conduct and Business Code of Ethics and Whistleblower Notice may be found on our website at
www.inuvo.com
. Copies of these materials also are available without charge upon written request to our corporate secretary.
Board of directors
The board of directors oversees our business affairs and monitors the performance of management. In accordance with our corporate governance principles, the board of directors does not involve itself in day-to-day operations. The directors keep themselves informed through discussions with the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer and by reading the reports and other materials that we send them and by participating in board of directors and committee meetings. Commencing with our 2008 annual meeting, our directors were divided into three classes and designated Class I, Class II and Class III. Directors may be assigned to each class in accordance with a resolution or resolutions adopted by the board of directors. Directors are elected for a full term of three years. Our directors hold office until their successors have been elected and duly qualified unless the director resigns or by reason of death or other cause is unable to serve in the capacity of director. If any director resigns, dies or is otherwise unable to serve out his or her term, or if the board increases the number of directors, the board may fill any vacancy by a vote of a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a
22
quorum exists. A director elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the unexpired term of his or her predecessor. Vacancies occurring by reason of the removal of directors without cause may only be filled by vote of the stockholders.
Board leadership structure and board’s role in risk oversight
Mr. Richard K. Howe serves as both the Executive Chairman of our board of directors and our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Charles D. Morgan, an independent director, serves as our Lead Independent Director. Our board believes our current structure provides independence and oversight, and facilitates the communication between senior management and the full board of directors regarding risk oversight, which the board believes strengthens its risk oversight activities. Moreover, the structure allows the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to better focus on his responsibilities of running the company, enhancing stockholder value and expanding and strengthening our business, while allowing the Lead Independent Director to lead the board in its fundamental role of providing independent oversight of management.
Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, strategic risk and reputation risk. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks we face, while the board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, the board of directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. To do this, the board of directors meets regularly with management, as well as independently, to review Inuvo's risks. Both our General Counsel and our Chief Financial Officer attend many of the board meetings and are available to address any questions or concerns raised by any member of the board on risk management and any other matter. The independent members of the board work together to provide strong, independent oversight of our management and affairs through the board's standing committees and, when necessary, special meetings of independent directors. Our independent directors may meet at any time in their sole discretion without any other directors or representatives of management present. Each independent director has access to the members of our management team or other employees as well as full access to our books and records. We have no policy limiting, and exert no control over, meetings of our independent directors.
Board committees
The board of directors has standing Audit and Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees. Each committee has a written charter. The charters are available on our website at
www.inuvo.com
. Except as set forth below, all committee members are independent directors. Information concerning the current membership and function of each committee is as follows:
|
Director
|
Audit Committee Member
|
|
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee Member
|
|
|
Charles D. Morgan
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
Patrick Terrell
|
a
|
|
a
|
|
|
Gordon J. Cameron
|
a
;
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
G. Kent Burnett
|
|
|
a
;
(1)
|
|
(1)
Denotes Chairperson.
Audit Committee
.
The Audit Committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to:
|
•
|
the integrity of our financial statements;
|
|
•
|
our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; and
|
|
•
|
the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accountants.
|
The Audit Committee is composed of two directors, each of whom have been determined by the board of directors to be independent as defined by the NYSE American Company Guide. The board has determined that each of Mr. Terrell and Mr. Cameron qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. During 2018, the Audit Committee held four meetings.
23
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee
. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is responsible for:
|
•
|
overseeing our compensation programs and practices, including our executive compensation plans and incentive compensation plans;
|
|
•
|
recommending the slate of director nominees for election to our board of directors;
|
|
•
|
identifying and recommending candidates to fill vacancies occurring between annual stockholder meetings;
|
|
•
|
reviewing the composition of board committees; and
|
|
•
|
monitoring compliance with, reviews, and recommends changes to our various corporate governance policies and guidelines.
|
The Chief Executive Officer provides input to the committee with respect to the individual performance and compensation recommendations for the other executive officers. The committee’s charter authorizes the committee to retain an independent consultant, and from time to time has done so. The committee did not retain a consultant in 2018. The committee also prepares and supervises the board’s annual review of director independence and the board’s annual self-evaluation.
A majority of the persons serving on our board of directors must be independent. Thus, the committee has considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his immediate family and us or our affiliates, including those reported under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below. The committee also reviewed transactions and relationships between directors or their affiliates and members of our senior management or their affiliates. As a result of this review, the committee affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Morgan, Terrell, Cameron and Burnett are independent as defined by the NYSE American Company Guide.
The committee considers all qualified candidates for our board of directors identified by members of the committee, by other members of the board of directors, by senior management and by our stockholders. The committee reviews each candidate including each candidate’s independence, skills and expertise based on a variety of factors, including the person’s experience or background in management, finance, regulatory matters and corporate governance. Further, when identifying nominees to serve as director, while we do not have a policy regarding the consideration of diversity in selecting directors, the committee seeks to create a board that is strong in its collective knowledge and has a diversity of skills and experience with respect to accounting and finance, management and leadership, vision and strategy, business operations, business judgment, industry knowledge and corporate governance. In addition, prior to nominating an existing director for re-election to the board of directors, the committee will consider and review an existing director’s board and committee attendance and performance, length of board service, experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to the board, equity ownership in Inuvo and independence.
The committee follows the same process and uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates proposed by stockholders, members of the board of directors and members of senior management. Based on its assessment of each candidate, the committee recommends candidates to the board. However, there is no assurance that there will be any vacancy on the board at the time of any submission or that the committee will recommend any candidate for the board.
During 2018 the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee was composed of three directors, all of whom have been determined by the board of directors to be independent as defined by the NYSE American Company Guide. Mr. Burnett serves as Chairman of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. During 2018, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee held one meeting and took action by unanimous written consent three times.
Stockholder nominations
Stockholders who would like to propose a candidate to serve on our board of directors may do so by submitting the candidate’s name, resume and biographical information to the attention of our corporate secretary. All proposals for nomination received by the corporate secretary will be presented to the committee for appropriate consideration. It is the policy of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee to consider director candidates recommended by stockholders who appear to be qualified to serve on our board of directors. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee may choose not to consider an unsolicited recommendation if no vacancy exists on the board of directors and the
24
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee does not perceive a need to increase the size of the board of directors. In order to avoid the unnecessary use of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee’s resources, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee will consider only those director candidates recommended in accordance with the procedures set forth below. To submit a recommendation of a director candidate to the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee, a stockholder should submit the following information in writing, addressed to the corporate secretary of Inuvo at our main office:
|
•
|
the name and address of the person recommended as a director candidate;
|
|
•
|
all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
|
|
•
|
the written consent of the person being recommended as a director candidate to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected;
|
|
•
|
as to the person making the recommendation, the name and address, as they appear on our books, of such person, and number of shares of our common stock owned by such person;
provided, however
, that if the person is not a registered holder of our common stock, the person should submit his or her name and address along with a current written statement from the record holder of the shares that reflects the recommending person’s beneficial ownership of our common stock; and
|
|
•
|
a statement disclosing whether the person making the recommendation is acting with or on behalf of any other person and, if applicable, the identity of such person.
|
Director qualification
The following is a discussion for each director of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee to recommend to the board, and for the board to conclude that the individual should be serving as a director of Inuvo.
Class I Directors
Richard K. Howe -
Mr. Howe’s track record as a successful high-technology operating and marketing executive in data, analytics, and marketing services as a result of building and/or running over a dozen businesses in five countries were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the board viewed favorably his position at companies that include Inuvo as president and CEO, Acxiom Corporation as chief marketing, business strategy and M&A officer, Fair Isaac & Company where he served as general manager, and ieWild, Inc. as co-founder and chairman and CEO; his service as a board member for the non-profit organization Business for Diplomatic Action; and his academic achievements at Concordia University and McGill University in making their recommendation.
Gordon J. Cameron
- Mr. Cameron's track record as a senior executive in a variety of business segments and his in excess three decades of experience in building successful businesses were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the board viewed favorably his position as Executive Vice President in Retail Lending at PNC Financial Services, one of the largest diversified financial services institutions in the United States, as well as his positions with companies such as Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Fair Isaac Corporation FICO, IeWild Inc., HNC Software Inc., Advanta National Bank/Fleet, The Cambell Group LTD and Fidelity Bank N.A and his academic achievements at Widener University School of Management and Pennsylvania State University in making their recommendation.
Class II Directors
G. Kent Burnett
-
Mr. Burnett's track record as a successful technology and ecommerce executive holding executive level technology positions were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee of the board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the board viewed favorably his experience at Dillard’s including as Chief Information Officer, Western Division Chairman and Vice President of Technology and Ecommerce, as well as his experience in various marketing, technology and engineering positions with IBM and his membership on the boards of directors of First Orion Corp. and Acumen Brands in making their recommendation.
25
Class III directors
Charles D. Morgan -
Mr. Morgan’s successful track record as a high-technology executive in data, analytics, outsourcing and marketing services with a network of relationships worldwide as a result of building a billion dollar annual revenue enterprise as chairman and chief executive officer were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the board viewed favorably his experience at companies such as Acxiom Corporation as Chairman and CEO and IBM as a systems engineer; his role as an equity owner of Bridgehampton Capital Management LLC and a significant investor in its funds; his service as Chairman of the Advisory Board and co-manager of investments for Bridgehampton Capital Management LLC; his leadership on the board and in various leadership roles with the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) including his service as chairman of the DMA in 2001; his service as a member and past chairman of the board of trustees of Hendrix College; and his academic achievements at the University of Arkansas in making their recommendation.
Patrick Terrell
- Mr. Terrell’s track record as a successful operating executive and investor were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the board viewed favorably Mr. Terrell’s services as founder and CEO of Leading Technology, a manufacturer of personal computers, his founding of Byte Shops Northwest, and his services as managing member of Terrell Group Management and PatRick Investments, LLC in making their recommendation.
In addition to the each of the individual skills and background described above, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and our board also concluded that each of these individuals will continue to provide knowledgeable advice to our other directors and to senior management on numerous issues facing our company and on the development and execution of our strategy.
Compensation of directors
Each independent member of our board of directors receives the following fees:
|
•
|
$30,000 annual retainer payable quarterly; and
|
|
•
|
$30,000 of restricted stock units, calculated at fair market value on the date of grant, vesting March 31.
|
The following table provides information concerning the compensation paid to our independent directors for their services as members of our board of directors for 2018. The information in the following table excludes any reimbursement of out-of-pocket travel and lodging expenses which we may have paid.
|
Director Compensation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Fees earned or paid in cash ($)
|
Stock
awards
($)
|
Option
awards
($)
|
Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
($)
|
Nonqualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
($)
|
All other
compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Charles D. Morgan
|
30,000
|
|
27,060
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
57,060
|
|
|||||||
|
Charles L. Pope
(1)
|
22,500
|
|
8,557
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
31,057
|
|
|||||||
|
Patrick Terrell
|
30,000
|
|
27,060
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
57,060
|
|
|||||||
|
Gordon J. Cameron
|
30,000
|
|
27,060
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
57,060
|
|
|||||||
|
G. Kent Burnett
|
30,000
|
|
27,060
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
57,060
|
|
|||||||
(1) Mr. Pope served as a member of our board of directors from September 2008 until July 2018.
Audit Committee Report
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the board of directors in its oversight of our financial reporting processes. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the financial statements, including establishing accounting and financial reporting principles and designing systems of internal control over financial reporting.
26
Our independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion as to the conformity of our consolidated financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and auditing management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
With respect to the year ended December 31, 2018, in addition to its other work, the Audit Committee:
|
•
|
reviewed and discussed with management and Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., our independent registered public accounting firm, our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2018 and the year then ended;
|
|
•
|
discussed with Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, “
Communication with Audit Committees
,” as amended, with respect to its review of the findings of the independent registered public accounting firm during its examination of our consolidated financial statements; and
|
|
•
|
received from Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. written affirmation of its independence as required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, “
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees
.” In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., its independence and determined that the provision of non-audit services was compatible with maintaining auditor independence.
|
The audit committee recommended, based on the review and discussion summarized above, that the board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in the 2018 10-K for filing with the SEC.
|
Dated March 6, 2019
|
|
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Inuvo, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gordon J. Cameron, Chairman
|
|
|
|
/s/Patrick Terrell
|
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the year ended December 31, 2018 and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the year ended December 31, 2018, as well as any written representation from a reporting person that no Form 5 is required, we are not aware that any officer, director or 10% or greater stockholder failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the aforementioned Forms, reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the year ended December 31, 2018.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Compensation philosophy
The fundamental objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers, motivate these executive officers to materially contribute to our long-term business success, and align the interests of our executive officers and stockholders by rewarding our executives for individual and corporate performance based on targets established by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee.
We believe that achievement of these compensation program objectives enhances long-term stockholder value. When designing compensation packages to reflect these objectives, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has adopted the following four principles as a guide:
|
•
|
Alignment with stockholder interests:
Compensation should be tied, in part, to our stock performance through the granting of equity awards to align the interests of executive officers with those of our stockholders;
|
|
•
|
Recognition for business performance:
Compensation should correlate in large part with our overall financial performance;
|
27
|
•
|
Accountability for individual performance:
Compensation should partially depend on the individual executive’s performance, in order to motivate and acknowledge the key contributors to our success; and
|
|
•
|
Competition:
Compensation should generally reflect the competitive marketplace and be consistent with that of other well-managed companies in our peer group. In implementing this compensation philosophy, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee takes into account the compensation amounts from the previous years for each of the named executive officers, and internal compensation equity between the named executive officers and other employees.
|
2018 compensation determination process
In 2018, the compensation program for our executive officers consisted of the following components:
|
•
|
base salary;
|
|
•
|
cash bonus plan;
|
|
•
|
2010 Plan awards;
|
|
•
|
2017 Plan awards; and
|
|
•
|
other fringe benefits and perquisites.
|
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation package consists of elements of compensation that are typically used to incentivize and reward executive management at other companies of our size, in our geographic area or in our industry. Each of these components is designed to meet the program's objectives of providing a combination of fixed and variable, performance-based compensation linked to individual and corporate performance. In the course of setting the initial compensation level for new hires or adjusting the compensation of existing employees, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee considered the advice and input of our management. Our Chief Executive Officer typically makes recommendations to the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee for any proposed changes in salary, as well as performance-based awards and stock option grants, for the other named executive officers. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee decides any salary change, as well as performance-based awards and stock option grants, for the Chief Executive Officer.
Base salary
Base salary is an important component of executive compensation because it provides executives with an assured-level of income, assists us in attracting executives and recognizes different levels of responsibility and authority among executives. The determination of base salaries is based upon the executive’s qualifications and experience, scope of responsibility and potential to achieve the goals and objectives established for the executive. Additionally, contractual provisions in executive employment agreements, past performance, internal pay equity and comparison to competitive salary practices are also considered.
In general, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee considers two types of potential base salary increases including “merit increases” based upon the executives’ individual performance and/or “market adjustments” based upon the peer group salary range for similar executives.
Plan awards
The objective of our long-term incentive program is to provide a long-term retention incentive for the named executive officers and others and to align their interests directly with those of our stockholders by way of stock ownership. Under our 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (the “
2010 Plan
”), and our 2017 Equity Compensation Plan (the “
2017 Plan
”), the board of directors or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has the discretion to determine whether equity awards will be granted to named executive officers and if so, the number of shares subject to each award. Both plans allow the board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee to grant options and restricted stock and other stock-based awards with respect to up to shares of our common stock, valued in whole or in part by reference to the fair market value of the stock. In most instances, these long-term grants vest over a multi-year basis.
The board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee determines the recipients of long-term incentive awards based upon such factors as performance, the length of continuous employment, managerial level, any prior
28
awards, and recruiting and retention demands, expectations and needs. All our employees are eligible for awards. The board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee grants such awards by formal action, which awards are not final until a stock option agreement is delivered by us and executed by both the company and the employee. There is no set schedule for the board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee to consider and grant awards. The board and the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee have the discretion to make grants whenever it deems it appropriate in our best interests. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has discretion to grant equity awards at any time.
We do not have any program, plan or practice in place to time option or other award grants with the release of material, non-public information and does not release such information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation. The exercise price of stock subject to options awarded under the our plans is the fair market value of the stock on the date the grant is approved by the board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. Under the terms of each plan, the fair market value of the stock is the closing sales price of the stock on the date the grant is approved by the board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee as reported by the NYSE American.
Cash Bonus Plan
For 2018 we approved a 2018 Management Incentive Program. The program established a variable cash incentive pool which may be awarded to executive officers and our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, based on achieving certain revenue and net income levels as determined by our 2018 financial results or at the discretion of the Committee. The program provided that the total incentive pool which was available for distribution would be divided between our executive officers (75% in the aggregate) and other employees (25% in the aggregate), subject to their continued employment with our company. The percentage of pool participation by each of our individual executive officers was fixed by the program and the amount of individual awards to our employees, other than our executive officers, was determined by our Chief Executive Officer. No cash bonuses were paid to our executive officers for 2018 because the targets under the 2018 Management Incentive Program were not met.
Other compensation and benefits
We have historically provided perquisites and other types of non-cash benefits on a very limited basis in an effort to avoid an entitlement mentality, reinforce a pay-for-performance orientation and minimize expense. Such benefits, when provided, can include additional health care benefits and additional life insurance.
Retirement and other post-termination benefits
Other than our 401(k) plan, employment agreements with our named executive officers and certain other employment agreements which provide for severance for termination without cause, we have not entered into any employment agreements that provide for a continuation of post-employment benefits. Our benefits plans are generally the same for all employees, and so as of the date of this report, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee does not believe that any such plans in their present forms would continue post-employment, except as required by law (including with respect to COBRA), or otherwise set forth in this report. We do not currently maintain any other retirement or post-termination benefits plans.
Change in control severance policy
We do not currently maintain any change in control severance plans or severance policies, except as provided in the executive employment agreements and the 2010 Plan and 2017 Plan, both of which are discussed in this section. Therefore, none of our named executive officers will receive any cash severance payments in the event we undergo a change in control, unless their employment agreement otherwise provides.
Insurance
All full-time employees, including the named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our standard medical, dental, long-term and short-term disability and life insurance plans. The terms of such benefits for the named executive officers are generally the same as those for all other company employees, with the exception of the level of life insurance coverage. We pay approximately 95% of the annual health insurance premium with employees paying the balance through payroll deductions. We pay for up to $1,000,000 of basic life insurance and AD&D insurance for our CEO, CFO, COO and General Counsel. All other full-time employees can elect basic life insurance and AD&D insurance coverage equal to their annual salary, up to $150,000, paid by us.
29
401(k)
Our employees can participate in a 401(k) plan, which is a qualified defined contribution retirement plan, sponsored by Insperity, professional employer organization that provides services to us. Participants are provided the opportunity to make salary reduction contributions to the plan on a pre-tax basis. We have the ability to make discretionary matching contributions and discretionary profit sharing contributions to such plan. Our practice has been to match participant’s contributions up to the first four percent of their annual earnings. The company match is fully vested when made. The company suspended its match in November 2018.
Other benefits
We seek to maintain an open and inclusive culture in our facilities and operations among executives and other company employees. Thus, we do not provide executives with separate dining or other facilities, nor do we have programs for providing personal-benefit perquisites to executives, such as defraying the cost of personal entertainment or family travel. Our basic health care and other insurance programs are generally the same for all eligible employees, including the named executive officers.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes all compensation recorded by us in each of the last two completed fiscal years for:
|
•
|
all individuals serving as our principal executive officer or acting in a similar capacity during the year ended December 31, 2018;
|
|
•
|
our two most highly compensated named executive officers at December 31, 2018 whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000; and
|
|
•
|
up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been made in this table but for the fact that the individual was not serving as a named executive officer of our company at December 31, 2018.
|
The value attributable to any option awards is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in the valuations of the option awards are included in Note 12 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 appearing later in this report.
|
Name and principal position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Nonequity incentive plan compen-sation ($)
|
Non-qualified deferred compen-sation earnings ($)
|
All
other compen-sation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Richard K. Howe,
|
2018
|
425,000
|
|
—
|
|
272,897
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
11,000
|
|
708,897
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
2017
|
420,000
|
|
245,000
|
|
442,175
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,800
|
|
1,117,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wallace D. Ruiz,
|
2018
|
275,000
|
|
—
|
|
97,463
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
11,000
|
|
383,463
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
2017
|
275,000
|
|
105,000
|
|
157,919
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,800
|
|
548,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don (Trey) Barrett III
|
2018
|
250,000
|
|
—
|
|
129,951
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,220
|
|
386,171
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
2017
|
250,000
|
|
140,000
|
|
210,560
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,000
|
|
603,560
|
|
On March 1, 2012, we entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Howe and Ruiz. Mr. Barrett does not have an employment agreement and his compensation is set by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee.
30
Executive Employment Agreements
The employment agreements entered into by Messrs. Howe and Ruiz, each referred to as an executive, have an initial term of one year, after which each executive’s employment agreement automatically renews for additional one-year periods on the same terms and conditions, unless either party to the agreement exercises the respective termination rights available to such party in the agreement. The employment agreements currently provide for a minimum annual base salary of $425,000 for Mr. Howe, and $275,000 for Mr. Ruiz. The employment agreements require our company to compensate the executives and provide them with certain benefits if their employment is terminated. The compensation and benefits the executives are entitled to receive upon termination of employment vary depending on whether their employment is terminated:
|
•
|
by us for cause (as defined in the employment agreements);
|
|
•
|
by us without cause, or by the executive for good reason (as defined in the employment agreements);
|
|
•
|
due to death or disability; or
|
|
•
|
by the executive without good reason.
|
In the event of a termination by our company without cause or a termination by the executive for good reason, the executive would be entitled to receive the following:
|
•
|
his earned but unpaid basic salary through the termination date, plus a portion of the executive’s bonus based upon the bonus he would have earned in the year in which his employment was terminated, pro-rated for the amount of time employed by us during such year and paid on the original date such bonus would have been payable;
|
|
•
|
an amount payable over the 12-month period following termination equal to one times the sum of his basic salary at the time of termination, plus a termination bonus equal to the bonus paid to the executive during the four fiscal quarters prior to the date of termination (except that if a target bonus has been established for Mr. Howe, each such person’s termination bonus is equal to his target bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, increased or decreased pursuant to actual performance versus targeted performance in the then current plan measured as of the end of the calendar month preceding the termination date), or in the event of a change of control (as defined below), the greater of the relevant calculation above or the bonus paid to the executive during the four fiscal quarters prior to the change of control;
|
|
•
|
any other amounts or benefits owing to the executive under our then-applicable employee benefit, long-term incentive, or equity plans and programs, within the terms of such plans, payable over the 12-month period following termination; and
|
|
•
|
benefits (including health, life, and disability) as if the executive was still an employee during the 12-month period following termination.
|
Finally, in the event of a termination without cause by our company, with good reason by the executive, or following a change of control (as defined in the employment agreements), any equity award held by the executive will immediately and fully vest and become exercisable throughout the full term of such award as if the executive were still employed by us. In the event of a termination by us with cause, Messrs. Ruiz and Howe would be entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of such executive’s base salary through the date of termination.
In the event of a termination by us of Mr. Ruiz upon the death or permanent disability of such executive, the executive would be entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of such executive’s base salary through the date of termination, the earned but unpaid portion of any vested incentive compensation under and consistent with plans adopted by us prior to the date of termination, and over the 12 months following the date of termination an amount equal to 20% base salary at the time of termination for each year of employment with us, capped at 100% of the base salary.
In the event of a termination by us of Mr. Howe upon the death or permanent disability of such executive, the executive would be entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of such executive’s base salary through the date of termination, any other amounts or benefits owing to the executive under any of our then-applicable employee benefit, long-term incentive or equity plans and programs, and over the 12 months following the date of termination an amount equal to 20% base salary at the time of termination for each year of employment with us, capped at 100% of the base salary.
31
In the event of a termination by Mr. Ruiz without good reason, such executive is entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of such executive’s base salary through the date of termination, and the earned but unpaid portion of any vested incentive compensation under and consistent with our plans adopted by us prior to the date of termination. In the event of a termination by Mr. Howe without good reason, such executive is entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of his base salary through the termination date and any other amounts and benefits owing to the executive under our then applicable employee benefit, long term incentive or equity plans and programs.
The executive may terminate employment for any reason (other than good reason) upon giving 30 days’ advance written notice to us. As to a termination by Mr. Ruiz for any reason other than a good reason, we will pay the executive the earned but unpaid portion of his base salary through the termination date and any earned but unpaid vested incentive compensation under and consistent with plans adopted by us prior to the date of termination. As to a termination by Mr. Howe for any reason other than a good reason, we will pay the executive the earned but unpaid portion of his base salary through the termination date and any other amounts and benefits owing to the executive under our then applicable employee benefit, long term incentive or equity plans and programs.
Outstanding equity awards at year end
The following table provides information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer outstanding as of December 31, 2018.
|
OPTION AWARDS
|
STOCK AWARDS
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Number of securities underlying unexercised options
(#) exercisable
|
Number of securities underlying unexercised options
(#) unexercisable
|
Equity incentive plan awards: Number of securities underlying unexercised unearned options
(#)
|
Option exercise price
($)
|
Option expiration date
|
Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)
|
Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested ($)
|
Equity incentive plan awards: Number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested (#)
|
Equity incentive plan awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested (#)
|
|||||||||
|
Richard K. Howe
|
120,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
3/14/2021
|
126,000
|
|
134,820
|
|
294,000
|
|
314,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wallace D. Ruiz
|
43,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
3/14/2021
|
45,000
|
|
48,150
|
|
105,000
|
|
112,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don (Trey) Barrett III
|
40,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
3/14/2021
|
60,000
|
|
64,200
|
|
140,000
|
|
149,800
|
|
Our equity compensation plans
Information regarding our 2010 Plan and 2017 Plan is contained in Note 12 to the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing later in this report.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
At March 1, 2019, we had 32,757,817 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The following table sets forth information known to us as of March 1, 2019 relating to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by:
|
•
|
each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;
|
|
•
|
each director and nominee;
|
|
•
|
each named executive officer; and
|
|
•
|
all named executive officers and directors as a group.
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner in the table set forth below is care of 500 President Clinton Avenue, Suite 300, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201. We believe that all persons, unless otherwise noted, named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as being owned by them. Under securities
32
laws, a person is considered to be the beneficial owner of securities owned by him (or certain persons whose ownership is attributed to him) and that can be acquired by him within 60 days from March 1, 2019, including upon the exercise of options, warrants or convertible securities. We determine a beneficial owner’s percentage ownership by assuming that options, warrants or convertible securities that are held by him, but not those held by any other person, and which are exercisable within 60 days of the that date, have been exercised or converted.
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
No. of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
% of Class
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
Charles Morgan
(1)
|
2,061,200
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
||
|
Richard K. Howe
(2)
|
1,094,808
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
||
|
Patrick Terrell
(3)
|
684,694
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
||
|
Wallace D. Ruiz
(4)
|
373,483
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
||
|
John B. Pisaris
|
320,855
|
|
1
|
%
|
||
|
Don Walker “Trey” Barrett III
(5)
|
359,290
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
||
|
G. Kent Burnett
(6)
|
173,685
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
||
|
Gordon J. Cameron
(7)
|
120,815
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
||
|
All named executive officers, directors and director nominees as a group (eight persons)
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
|
5,188,800
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
||
|
Onset V L.P.
(8)
|
2,559,691
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
||
|
Ingalls & Snyder, LLC
(9)
|
2,349,471
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
||
|
Renaissance Technologies LLC
(10)
|
1,633,390
|
|
5
|
%
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes 38,961 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise restricted stock grants and shares of common stock held by Ingalls & Snyder, LLC on his behalf. See footnote 9.
|
(2) Includes 120,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options.
(3) Includes 38,961 shares pursuant to the exercise of restricted stock grants.
(4) Includes 43,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options.(5)
(5) Includes 40,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options.
|
(6)
|
Includes 38,961 shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of restricted stock grants.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes 6,630 shies held by Mrs. Cameron and 38,961 shares pursuant to the exercise of restricted stock grants.
|
|
(8)
|
Onset V L.P.’s address is 2400 Sand Hill Road, Suite 150, Menlo Park CA 94025.
|
|
(9)
|
Pursuant to the Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on June 26, 2018, Ingalls & Snyder, LLC has dispositive power over shares held by Mr. Charles D. Morgan and Mr. G. Kent Burnett who serve as members of Inuvo's board of directors and Mr. Richard K. Howe who serves as Inuvo's Chairman and CEO. The principal business address of Ingalls & Snyder, LLC is 1325 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10019-6066. See footnote 1.
|
|
(10)
|
Renaissance Technologies LLC’s address is 800 Third Avenue, New York NY 10022.
|
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth securities authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders as well as any equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders as of December 31, 2018.
33
|
Plan category
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights(a) (1)
|
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) (2)
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Plans approved by our stockholders:
|
||||||||||
|
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
|
13,748
|
|
$
|
2.97
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
2010 Equity Compensation Plan
|
1,088,862
|
|
$
|
2.83
|
|
612,237
|
|
|||
|
2017 Equity Compensation Plan
|
733,500
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
1,524,836
|
|
|||
|
Plans not approved by stockholders
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
The numbers in this column (a) reflect shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of outstanding RSUs.
|
|
(2)
|
The weighted-average exercise prices in this column are based on outstanding options and do not take into account unvested awards of RSUs as these awards do not have an exercise price.
|
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
In April 2013, we entered into a Services Agreement with First Orion Corp. whereby we provided each other with office and technical support services on a cost plus 30% basis. The fees under the Services Agreement fluctuated depending on usage and in 2018 and 2017, we received a total of $31,500 and $117,385, respectively from First Orion Corp. for providing services.
On November 2, 2018, each of Messrs. Howe, Morgan, Burnett and Cameron lent us $62,500, for an aggregate of $250,000, under the terms of 10% Promissory Notes. We used the proceeds from these notes to pay certain costs associated with the pending Merger. The notes are unsecured, bear interest at 10% per annum and the principal and accrued interest is due on November 2, 2019, subject to acceleration upon an Event of Default or Change of Control (as both terms are defined in the note).
Other than these transactions, there have been no transactions since January 1, 2017 nor are there any currently proposed transactions in which we were or are to be participant in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Director independence
Each of Messrs. Morgan, Terrell, Cameron and Burnett are independent directors as defined by the NYSE American Company Guide.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
The following table shows the fees that were billed for the audit and other services provided for the years indicated.
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
||||||
|
Audit Fees
|
$
|
262,000
|
|
$
|
331,711
|
|
||
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
32,000
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Tax Fees
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
All Other Fees
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
294,000
|
|
$
|
331,711
|
|
||
Audit Fees
- This category includes the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with engagements for those fiscal years. This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of interim financial statements.
34
Audit-Related Fees
- This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” The services for the fees disclosed under this category include consultation regarding our correspondence with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other accounting consulting.
Tax Fees
- This category consists of professional services rendered by CBIZ MHM, an affiliate of our independent registered public accounting firm, for tax compliance and tax advice. The services for the fees disclosed under this category include tax return preparation and technical tax advice.
All Other Fees
- This category consists of fees for other miscellaneous items.
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. leases substantially all of its personnel, who work under the control of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. shareholders, from wholly-owned subsidiaries of CBIZ, Inc., in an alternative practice structure.
Our board of directors has adopted a procedure for pre-approval of all fees charged by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the procedure, the Audit Committee of the board approves the engagement letter with respect to audit, tax and review services. Other fees are subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee of the board. The audit fees paid to the auditors with respect to 2018 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee of the board of directors.
35
PART IV
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
.
1. Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements and Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm are listed in the “Index to Financial Statements and Schedules” beginning on page F-1 and included on pages F-2 through F-22.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are either not required under the related instructions, are not applicable (and therefore have been omitted), or the required disclosures are contained in the consolidated financial statements herein.
3. Exhibits (including those incorporated by reference).
*** Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Commission under Rule 24b-2. The omitted material has been filed separately with the Commission. The location of the omitted confidential information is indicated in the exhibit with asterisks (***).
|
No.
|
Exhibit Description
|
Form
|
Date Filed
|
Number
|
Filed or Furnished Herewith
|
|||
|
1.1
|
8-K
|
5/11/18
|
1.1
|
|||||
|
2.1
|
8-K
|
7/24/09
|
2.4
|
|||||
|
2.2
|
8-K
|
10/17/11
|
2.5
|
|||||
|
2.3
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
2.1
|
|||||
|
2.4
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
2.2
|
|||||
|
2.5
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
2.3
|
|||||
|
2.6
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
2.4
|
|||||
|
2.7
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
2.5
|
|||||
|
2.8
|
8-K/A
|
3/5/19
|
2.1
|
|||||
|
3(i).1
|
10-KSB
|
3/1/04
|
4
|
|||||
|
3(i).2
|
10-KSB
|
3/31/06
|
3.2
|
|||||
|
3(i).3
|
8-K
|
7/24/09
|
3.4
|
|||||
|
3(i).4
|
8-K
|
12/10/10
|
3(i).4
|
|||||
|
3(i).5
|
10-K
|
3/29/12
|
3(i).5
|
|||||
|
3(i).6
|
10-K
|
3/29/12
|
3(i).6
|
|||||
|
3(ii).1
|
10-K
|
3/31/10
|
3(ii).4
|
|||||
|
3(ii).2
|
8-K
|
3/6/12
|
3(ii).1
|
|||||
|
4.1
|
8-K
|
2/19/08
|
4.1
|
|||||
|
4.2
|
8-K
|
10/17/11
|
10.23
|
|||||
|
4.3
|
8-K
|
3/6/18
|
4.1
|
|||||
|
10.1
|
8-K
|
3/6/12
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.2
|
8-K
|
3/6/12
|
10.6
|
|||||
36
|
10.3
|
8-K
|
3/6/12
|
10.7
|
|||||
|
10.4
|
10-Q
|
8/9/12
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.5
|
10-Q
|
11/8/12
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.6
|
10-Q
|
5/9/13
|
10.8
|
|||||
|
10.7
|
10-K
|
3/10/14
|
10.27
|
|||||
|
10.8
|
10-Q
|
10/30/14
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.9
|
10-Q
|
10/30/14
|
10.2
|
|||||
|
10.10
|
10-Q
|
10/26/16
|
10.26
|
|||||
|
10.11
|
10-K
|
2/16/17
|
10.31
|
|||||
|
10.12
|
10-Q
|
5/5/17
|
10.26
|
|||||
|
10.13
|
10-Q
|
8/8/17
|
10.29
|
|||||
|
10.14
|
10-Q
|
11/7/18
|
10.4
|
|||||
|
10.15
|
Filed
|
|||||||
|
10.16
|
10-K
|
3/13/13
|
10.25
|
|||||
|
10.17
|
10-Q
|
4/29/15
|
10.31
|
|||||
|
10.18
|
10-K
|
2/16/17
|
10.32
|
|||||
|
10.19
|
Filed ***
|
|||||||
|
10.20
|
10-Q
|
5/15/12
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.21
|
10-Q/A
|
12/28/12
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.22
|
10-Q/A
|
1/6/14
|
10.28
|
|||||
|
10.23
|
10-K
|
2/12/16
|
10.24
|
|||||
|
10.24
|
10-Q
|
4/27/16
|
10.25
|
|||||
|
10.25
|
8-K
|
3/6/18
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.26
|
8-K
|
5/15/18
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.27
|
10-Q
|
11/7/18
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.28
|
Filed ***
|
|||||||
|
10.29
|
10-Q
|
11/7/18
|
10.5
|
|||||
|
10.30
|
8-K
|
3/05/19
|
10.1
|
|||||
|
10.31
|
8-K
|
3/05/19
|
10.2
|
|||||
|
10.32
|
DEF14A
|
4/30/2010
|
A
|
|||||
|
10.33
|
S-8
|
2/29/2012
|
99.2
|
|||||
|
10.34
|
DEF14A
|
4/28/2017
|
A
|
|||||
|
10.35
|
10-K
|
3/13/2013
|
10.23
|
|||||
|
10.36
|
10-K
|
3/13/2013
|
10.24
|
|||||
|
10.37
|
10-Q
|
4/29/2015
|
10.30
|
|||||
|
10.38
|
10-Q
|
8/8/2017
|
10.28
|
|||||
|
10.39
|
8-K
|
3/6/2012
|
10.2
|
|||||
|
10.4
|
8-K
|
3/6/2012
|
10.4
|
|||||
|
10.41
|
8-K
|
3/6/2012
|
10.5
|
|||||
|
10.42
|
8-K
|
2/7/2017
|
10.1
|
|||||
37
|
21.1
|
Filed
|
|||||||
|
23.1
|
Filed
|
|||||||
|
31.1
|
Filed
|
|||||||
|
31.2
|
Filed
|
|||||||
|
32.1
|
Filed
|
|||||||
|
32.2
|
Filed
|
|||||||
|
99.1
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
99.1
|
|||||
|
99.2
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
99.2
|
|||||
|
99.3
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
99.3
|
|||||
|
99.4
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
99.4
|
|||||
|
99.5
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
99.5
|
|||||
|
99.6
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
99.6
|
|||||
|
99.7
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
99.7
|
|||||
|
99.8
|
8-K
|
11/5/18
|
99.8
|
|||||
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
Filed
|
||||||
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
Filed
|
||||||
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
Filed
|
||||||
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
Filed
|
||||||
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
Filed
|
||||||
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
Filed
|
||||||
|
*
|
The Company has omitted schedules and similar attachments to the subject agreement pursuant to Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K. The Company will furnish a copy of any omitted schedule or similar attachment to the SEC upon request.
|
|||||||
|
***
|
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Rule 24b-2. The omitted confidential material has been filed separately. The location of the omitted confidential information is indicated in the exhibit with asterisks (***).
|
|||||||
38
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
The Company has elected not to provide this optional information.
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
Inuvo, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2019
|
By:
|
/s/ Wallace D. Ruiz
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard K. Howe
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, and principal executive officer
|
|
March 15, 2019
|
|
Richard K. Howe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Wallace D. Ruiz
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer
|
|
March 15, 2019
|
|
Wallace D. Ruiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ G. Kent Burnett
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2019
|
|
G. Kent Burnett
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gordon J. Cameron
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2019
|
|
Gordon J. Cameron
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Charles D. Morgan
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2019
|
|
Charles D. Morgan
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick Terrell
|
Director
|
March 15, 2019
|
||
|
Patrick Terrell
|
||||
40
INUVO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2018
AND
2017
INDEX TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
CONTENTS
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Inuvo, Inc.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Inuvo, Inc. (“Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.
March 15, 2019
Clearwater, Florida
F-2
Inuvo, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cash
|
$
|
228,956
|
|
$
|
4,084,686
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $63,727 and $83,789, respectively
|
6,711,595
|
|
10,759,250
|
|
|||
|
Unbilled revenue
|
11,754
|
|
4,330
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
259,712
|
|
395,861
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
7,212,017
|
|
15,244,127
|
|
|||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
2,123,672
|
|
2,306,279
|
|
|||
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|||||
|
Goodwill
|
9,853,342
|
|
9,853,342
|
|
|||
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
|
9,441,681
|
|
10,808,018
|
|
|||
|
Other assets
|
35,170
|
|
36,070
|
|
|||
|
Total other assets
|
19,330,193
|
|
20,697,430
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
28,665,882
|
|
$
|
38,247,836
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|||||||
|
Current liabilities
|
|||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
9,499,541
|
|
$
|
13,614,053
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
2,489,834
|
|
2,887,816
|
|
|||
|
Financed receivables
|
1,859,853
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Notes payable
|
250,000
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Revolving line of credit
|
—
|
|
4,900,000
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
14,099,228
|
|
21,401,869
|
|
|||
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred tax liability
|
2,339,832
|
|
2,331,900
|
|
|||
|
Convertible promissory note
|
1,000,000
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
193,007
|
|
426,725
|
|
|||
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
3,532,839
|
|
2,758,625
|
|
|||
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|||||||
|
Preferred stock, $.001 par value:
|
|||||||
|
Authorized shares 500,000, none issued and outstanding
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Common stock, $.001 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Authorized shares 40,000,000; issued shares 32,757,817 and 28,994,981 respectively; outstanding shares 32,381,290 and 28,618,454, respectively
|
32,759
|
|
28,996
|
|
|||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
138,867,509
|
|
136,033,967
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(126,469,894
|
)
|
(120,579,062
|
)
|
|||
|
Treasury stock, at cost - 376,527 shares
|
(1,396,559
|
)
|
(1,396,559
|
)
|
|||
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
11,033,815
|
|
14,087,342
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
28,665,882
|
|
$
|
38,247,836
|
|
|
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm and notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Inuvo, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Net revenue
|
$
|
73,330,642
|
|
$
|
79,554,493
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
29,921,482
|
|
36,669,543
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
43,409,160
|
|
42,884,950
|
|
|||
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|||||
|
Marketing costs (TAC)
|
31,852,190
|
|
28,578,401
|
|
|||
|
Compensation
|
8,524,476
|
|
10,200,117
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
8,502,874
|
|
8,342,906
|
|
|||
|
Total operating expenses
|
48,879,540
|
|
47,121,424
|
|
|||
|
Operating loss
|
(5,470,380
|
)
|
(4,236,474
|
)
|
|||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(420,452
|
)
|
(318,193
|
)
|
|||
|
Loss from continuing operations before taxes
|
(5,890,832
|
)
|
(4,554,667
|
)
|
|||
|
Income tax benefit
|
—
|
|
1,498,076
|
|
|||
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
(5,890,832
|
)
|
(3,056,591
|
)
|
|||
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
(1,109
|
)
|
|||
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(5,890,832
|
)
|
$
|
(3,057,700
|
)
|
|
|
Per common share data
|
|
|
|||||
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
31,019,623
|
|
28,155,320
|
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
31,019,623
|
|
28,155,320
|
|
|||
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm and notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Inuvo, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2018
and
2017
|
|
Common Stock
|
Additional Paid in Capital
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
Treasury Stock
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances as of December 31, 2016
|
24,923,662
|
|
$
|
25,300
|
|
$
|
130,418,413
|
|
$
|
(117,521,362
|
)
|
$
|
(1,396,559
|
)
|
$
|
11,525,792
|
|
|||||
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3,057,700
|
)
|
—
|
|
(3,057,700
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,279,807
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,279,807
|
|
||||||||||
|
Stock issued for vested restricted stock awards
|
309,057
|
|
309
|
|
22,200
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
22,509
|
|
||||||||||
|
2017 asset acquisition
|
3,529,000
|
|
3,529
|
|
4,455,715
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,459,244
|
|
||||||||||
|
Taxes withheld on vested restricted stock
|
(97,539
|
)
|
(97,539
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Treasury Stock Retirement
|
(143,265
|
)
|
(142
|
)
|
(44,629
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(44,771
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Balances as of December 31, 2017
|
28,618,454
|
|
$
|
28,996
|
|
$
|
136,033,967
|
|
$
|
(120,579,062
|
)
|
$
|
(1,396,559
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,087,342
|
|
||||
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(5,890,832
|
)
|
—
|
|
(5,890,832
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
915,469
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
915,469
|
|
||||||||||
|
Stock issued for vested restricted stock awards
|
527,866
|
|
528
|
|
(528
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Shares withheld for taxes on vested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
(78,747
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(78,747
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Sale of common stock
|
3,289,000
|
|
3,289
|
|
1,997,294
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,000,583
|
|
||||||||||
|
Cancellation of common stock
|
(54,030
|
)
|
(54
|
)
|
54
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Balances as of December 31, 2018
|
32,381,290
|
|
$
|
32,759
|
|
$
|
138,867,509
|
|
$
|
(126,469,894
|
)
|
$
|
(1,396,559
|
)
|
$
|
11,033,815
|
|
|||||
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm and notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Inuvo, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2018
and
2017
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Operating activities:
|
|||||||
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(5,890,832
|
)
|
$
|
(3,057,700
|
)
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
3,181,619
|
|
3,029,801
|
|
|||
|
Stock based compensation
|
915,469
|
|
1,279,807
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of financing fees
|
40,382
|
|
25,600
|
|
|||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
7,931
|
|
(1,406,600
|
)
|
|||
|
(Recovery)/Provision for doubtful accounts
|
(20,062
|
)
|
60,789
|
|
|||
|
Write-off of publisher payable
|
—
|
|
315,137
|
|
|||
|
Adjustment of European liabilities related to discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
1,109
|
|
|||
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenue
|
4,058,591
|
|
(1,216,611
|
)
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
139,031
|
|
52,687
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
(4,114,512
|
)
|
437,241
|
|
|||
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
(417,784
|
)
|
(669,541
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(2,100,167
|
)
|
(1,148,281
|
)
|
|||
|
Investing activities:
|
|||||||
|
Purchases of equipment and capitalized development costs
|
(1,634,919
|
)
|
(1,558,693
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash received from NetSeer asset acquisition
|
—
|
|
235,763
|
|
|||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(1,634,919
|
)
|
(1,322,930
|
)
|
|||
|
Financing activities:
|
|||||||
|
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
|
2,000,583
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from financed receivables
|
1,859,853
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from convertible promissory note
|
1,000,000
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from note payable
|
250,000
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Net proceeds on revolving line of credit
|
(4,900,000
|
)
|
4,900,000
|
|
|||
|
Payments on capital leases
|
(211,671
|
)
|
(158,782
|
)
|
|||
|
Net taxes paid on RSU grants exercised
|
(77,044
|
)
|
(97,376
|
)
|
|||
|
Prepaid financing fees
|
(42,365
|
)
|
25,600
|
|
|||
|
Payoff of NetSeer debt acquired
|
—
|
|
(2,015,577
|
)
|
|||
|
Treasury Stock Repurchase
|
—
|
|
(44,772
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(120,644
|
)
|
2,609,093
|
|
|||
|
Net change – cash
|
(3,855,730
|
)
|
137,882
|
|
|||
|
Cash, beginning of year
|
4,084,686
|
|
3,946,804
|
|
|||
|
Cash, end of year
|
$
|
228,956
|
|
$
|
4,084,686
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information:
|
|||||||
|
Interest paid
|
$
|
388,757
|
|
$
|
268,960
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
|
NetSeer asset acquisition (See Note 17)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4,459,244
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment under capital lease
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
530,407
|
|
|
|
Write-down of domain names due to settlement of contingent liability
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
369,506
|
|
|
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm and notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Inuvo, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2018
and
2017
Note 1 – Organization and Business
Company Overview
Inuvo, Inc. is a technology company that provides data-driven platforms that can automatically identify and message online audiences for any product or service across devices, channels and formats, including video, mobile, connected TV, display, social and native. These capabilities allow Inuvo’s clients to engage with their customers and prospects in a manner that drives engagement from the first contact with the consumer. Inuvo facilitates over a billion marketing messages to consumers every single month and counts among its clients numerous world-renowned names in industries that have included retail, automotive, insurance, health care, technology, telecommunications and finance. Inuvo counts among its many contractual relationships,
three
clients who collectively manage over
50%
of all U.S. digital media budgets.
Inuvo’s solution incorporates a proprietary form of artificial intelligence, or AI, branded the IntentKey. This sophisticated machine learning technology uses interactions with Internet content as a source of information from which to predict consumer intent. The AI includes a continually updated database of over
500 million
machine profiles which Inuvo utilizes to deliver highly aligned online audiences to its clients. Inuvo earns revenue when consumers view or click on its client’s messages. Inuvo’s business scales through account management activity with existing clients and by adding new clients through sales activity.
As part of Inuvo’s technology strategy, it owns a collection of websites like alot.com and earnspendlive.com, where Inuvo creates content in health, finance, travel, careers, auto, education and living categories. These sites provide the means to test Inuvo’s technologies, while also delivering high quality consumers to clients through the interaction with proprietary content in the form of images, videos, slideshows and articles.
There are many barriers to entry to Inuvo’s business that would require proficiency in large scale data center management, software development, data products, analytics, artificial intelligence, integration to the internet of things, or IOT, the relationships required to execute within the IOT and the ability to process tens of billions of transactions daily. Inuvo’s intellectual property is protected by
15
issued and
8
pending patents.
Liquidity
On October 11, 2018, we entered into the Amended and Restated Business Financing Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Financing Agreement”) with Western Alliance Bank. The Amended and Restated Financing Agreement, which is secured by all of our assets, superseded in its entirety the prior the Business Financing Agreement, as amended, that we entered into on March 1, 2012 with Bridge Bank, N.A. which is now owned by Western Alliance Bank. The Amended and Restated Financing Agreement does not have a term and either party may terminate upon notice to the other party.
During the third quarter of 2017, we filed an S-3 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to replace an existing, expiring S-3 "shelf" registration statement, which permits us to offer and sell up to
$15 million
of our securities from time to time in one or more offerings. In May 2018, we took down from this shelf registration statement approximately
$2.3 million
in the underwritten public offering. The underwritten public offering of
2,860,000
shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $.
70
per share and an additional
429,000
shares to cover overallotments in connection with the offering. The net proceeds were
$2.0 million
after deducting the underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses payable.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, our revenues declined
7.8%
from the prior year. The lower revenue in 2018 is principally responsible for our
$5.9 million
net loss in 2018. Of the
$5.9 million
loss, approximately
$4.1 million
was depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense. Further, we had roughly
$500 thousand
of merger related costs and an additional
$175 thousand
dollars in other non-cash accruals. Since our credit facility is dependent upon receivables, and we do not know when, if ever, that our revenues will return to historic levels or if we will be able to replace those lost revenues with revenues from other sources, the combination of lower credit availability and recent negative cash flows generated from operating activities introduces potential risk of operation without interruption. As described earlier in this report, on November 2, 2018, we entered into the Merger Agreement. At the closing the Merger, which is subject to a number of conditions precedent, the Company will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of CPT. In addition, on November 1, 2018, we borrowed
$1 million
from an affiliate of CPT which we are using for working capital, and on November 2, 2018,
four
directors
F-7
of the Company lent us
$62,500
each, for an aggregate of
$250,000
, to cover certain costs associated with the pending Merger. In March 2019, we sold an aggregate of
$1,440,000
Original Issue Discount Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Notes due September 1, 2020 in a private placement and received
$1,200,000
in proceeds which we are using for working capital. Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement and the credit facility with the additional borrowing, together with this additional capital raise, we believe we will have sufficient cash and credit to operate until the Merger closes. There are no assurances we will be successful in our efforts to generate revenues, report profitable operations or close the Merger in which case we would need to find additional sources of credit and make substantial reductions to operating expense.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation
- The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and cash equivalents
- Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Revenue recognition
- In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (Topic 606) "Revenue from
Contracts with Customers." Topic 606 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition” (Topic 605), and requires entities to recognize revenue when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach and elected to apply the new guidance only to contracts that were not complete as of the date of adoption. The cumulative impact to retained earnings was not material.
Most of our revenue is generated through clicks on advertisements presented on our properties or those of our partners. We
recognize revenue from clicks in the period in which the click occurs. Payments to partners who display advertisements on our
behalf are recognized as cost of revenue. Revenue from data sales and commissions is recognized in the period in which the
transaction occurs and the other revenue recognition criteria are met. Effective January 1, 2018, revenues are recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. We also recognize revenue from serving impressions when we complete all or a part of an order from an advertiser. The revenue is recognized in the period that the impression is served.
The below table is the proportion of revenue that is generated through advertisements on our partners sites and owned sites:
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||||||||
|
Partners
|
$
|
52,087,368
|
|
71.0
|
%
|
$
|
59,745,179
|
|
75.1
|
%
|
||
|
Owned Sites
|
21,243,274
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
19,809,314
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
73,330,642
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
79,554,493
|
|
100
|
%
|
||
The following table presents our revenue disaggregated by channel:
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2018
|
2017
|
||||||
|
Mobile
|
$
|
50,785,680
|
|
$
|
49,216,065
|
|
|
|
Desktop
|
21,398,065
|
|
29,392,347
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
1,146,897
|
|
946,081
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
73,330,642
|
|
$
|
79,554,493
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
- Accounts receivable consists of trade receivables from customers. We record accounts receivable at its net realizable value, recognizing an allowance for doubtful accounts based on our best estimate of probable credit losses on our
F-8
existing accounts receivable. Balances are written off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the possibility of recovery is considered remote.
Marketing costs
- Marketing costs or Traffic Acquisition Costs ("TAC") include the purchase of sponsored listings from search engines and is our primary method of attracting consumers to our owned and operated applications and websites. We expense these costs as incurred and present them as a separate line item in operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Property and equipment
- Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized while maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Costs of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from accounts and the net gain or loss is reflected as an operating expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over
three years
for equipment,
five
to
seven years
for furniture and fixtures and
two
to
three years
for software. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease. Depreciation expense was
$1,815,281
and
$1,503,449
, respectively, for the years ended
December 31, 2018
and
2017
.
Capitalized Software Costs
- We capitalize certain costs related to internally developed software and amortize these costs using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, generally
two years
. We do not sell internally developed software. Certain development costs not meeting the criteria for capitalization, in accordance with
ASC 350-40 Internal-Use Software
, are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill
- Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. In accordance with
ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(“ASC 350”), we test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis or more frequently if we believe indicators of impairment exist. The impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying value, including goodwill.
We generally determine the fair value of our reporting units using the income approach methodology of valuation that includes the undiscounted cash flow method as well as other generally accepted valuation methodologies. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, the amount it exceeds fair value is equivalent to the amount of impairment loss.
We determined there was
no
impairment of goodwill during
2018
and
2017
.
See Note 5, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, for more information.
Intangible Assets
- We allocate a portion of the purchase price of acquisitions to identifiable intangible assets and we amortize definite-lived assets over their estimated useful lives. We consider our indefinite-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Trade names are not amortized as they are believed to have an indefinite life. Trade names are reviewed annually for impairment under ASC 350.
As a result of our acquisition of Vertro, Inc. ("Vertro") in March 2012, we recognized an asset for the customer relationship with Google of
$8,820,000
and assigned it a useful life of
20
years. A primary reason for acquiring Vertro was its relationship with Google. Up to the time of the acquisition, we principally had access to the Yahoo! inventory of advertisements. Among the many valuable assets acquired in the Vertro transaction was this Google relationship and the access it provided to an enormous inventory of advertisements. In addition, we acquired the ALOT brand, whose products are monetized through Google and has historically produced a better margin than monetization through Yahoo!. In determining the useful life of this asset, we considered the strategic importance of Vertro's strong relationship with Google. Vertro and its predecessor company had contracts and successful renewals with Google that date back to 2006. The Google contract has been extended through February 2021. We expect the relationship with Google to continue through the
20
-year amortization period and beyond.
At the time of the Vertro acquisition, we engaged a third party valuation service to determine the fair value of the acquired assets. At the close of the
2018
and
2017
fiscal years, we again engaged a third party valuation service to reassess the fair value of the acquired assets. We recorded
no
impairment of intangible assets during
2018
or
2017
.
See Note 5, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, for more information.
F-9
Income taxes
- We utilize the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in
ASC 740
,
Income Taxes
(“ASC 740”). Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we must project future levels of taxable income, which requires significant judgment. We examine evidence related to the history of taxable losses or income, the economic conditions in which we operate, organizational characteristics, our forecasts and projections, as well as factors affecting liquidity. All our deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded as long-term assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. In 2017, we recognized an income tax benefit of
$1,498,076
due to the passing of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017. The new law reduced corporate income tax rates from 35% to 21%. As a result, the deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded in the 2017 consolidated balance sheet were reevaluated at the new tax rates. Both the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities were reduced. The decrease in the deferred tax liability resulted in the one-time tax benefit.
We believe it is more likely than not that essentially none of our deferred tax assets will be realized, and we have recorded a full valuation for the net deferred tax assets as of
December 31, 2018
and
2017
.
We have adopted certain provisions of ASC 740. This statement clarifies the criteria that an individual tax position must satisfy for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in a company’s financial statements. ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold of more likely than not, and a measurement attribute for all tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, in order to be recognized in the financial statements.
Impairment of long-lived assets
- In accordance with
ASC 360
,
Property, Plant and Equipment
, long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the asset is measured by comparison of the carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the asset is expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value.
Stock-based compensation
- We value stock compensation based on the fair value recognition provisions
ASC 718
,
Compensation – Stock Compensation,
which establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee services and requires companies to expense the estimated grant date fair value of stock awards over the requisite employee service period.
The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of the grant. To value stock option awards, we use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. This model involves assumptions including the expected life of the option, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield and exercise price. We recognize compensation expense in earnings over the requisite service period, applying a forfeiture rate to account for expected forfeitures of awards.
See Note 12, Stock-Based Compensation, for further details on our stock awards.
Government Grant
- During the first quarter of 2013, we received a grant from the state of Arkansas to relocate our corporate headquarters to Conway, AR. We recognize the grant funds into income as a reduction of the related expense in the period in which those expenses are recognized. We defer grant funds related to capitalized costs and classify them as current or long-term liabilities on the balance sheet according to the classification of the associated asset.
As of December 31, 2018, there were
39
employees in Arkansas,
eleven
employees under the required
50
. As such, we recorded a contingent liability
$55,000
.
Treasury Stock
- The cost method was used in recording the purchase of the treasury stock. Treasury stock changes as a result of common stock we acquire in the market.
Earnings per share
- During the periods presented, we had securities that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, but were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. We reported a net loss for 2018 and 2017 and therefore, shares associated with stock options, warrants and restricted stock are not included because they are anti-dilutive. Basic and diluted net loss per share is the same for all periods presented.
Operating segments
-
In accordance with
ASC 280
- Segment reporting
, segment information reported is built on the basis of internal management data used for performance analysis of businesses and for the allocation of resources. Operating segments
F-10
are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker, its chief executive officer, reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis and no expense or operating income is evaluated at a segment level. Given the consolidated level of review by the Company’s chief executive officer, the Company operates as
one
reportable segment. Most net revenue is earned in the United States and all long-lived assets are located in the United States.
Concentration of credit risk
- We are exposed to concentrations of risk primarily in cash and accounts receivable, which are generally not collateralized. Our policy is to place our cash with high credit quality financial institutions in order to limit the amount of credit exposure. At times, deposits may exceed FDIC limits. We do not require collateral from our customers, but our credit extension and collection policies include monitoring payments and aggressively pursuing delinquent accounts. We maintain allowances for potential credit losses.
Customer concentrations
- At
December 31, 2018
, we had
two
individual customers with accounts receivable balances greater than
10%
of the gross accounts receivable from continuing operations. These customers combined owed approximately
71.1%
of our gross accounts receivable balance as of
December 31, 2018
. The same
two
customers accounted for
81.8%
of our revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2018
.
In 2017, we had
two
individual customers with accounts receivable balances greater than
10%
of the gross accounts receivable from continuing operations. These customers combined owed approximately
71.3%
of our gross accounts receivable balance as of
December 31, 2017
. The same
two
customers accounted for
76.1%
of our revenue for the year ended and
December 31, 2017
.
Use of estimates
- The preparation of financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"), requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates and assumptions used in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are based upon management’s regular evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. We regularly evaluate estimates and assumptions related to allowances for returns and redemptions, allowances for doubtful accounts, goodwill and purchased intangible asset valuations, lives of intangible assets, deferred income tax asset valuation allowances, contingent liabilities, including the Arkansas grant contingency, and stock compensation. Actual results may differ from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements, and such differences could be material.
Litigation and settlement costs
- From time to time, we are involved in disputes, litigation and other legal actions. In accordance with
ASC 450
,
Contingencies
, we record a charge equal to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss contingency when both of the following conditions are met: (i) information available prior to issuance of the consolidated financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and (ii) the range of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Additional accounting pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02), as amended, which generally requires lessees to recognize operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets on the balance sheet and to provide enhanced disclosures surrounding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leasing arrangements. We will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019 on a modified retrospective basis and will not restate comparative periods. We will elect the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which allows us to carryforward our historical lease classification, our assessment on whether a contract is or contains a lease, and our initial direct costs for any leases that exist prior to adoption of the new standard. We will also elect to combine lease and non-lease components and to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off the balance sheet and recognize the associated lease payments in the consolidated statements of income on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We do not expect the new standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
N
ote 3 – Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows during the years ended
December 31, 2018
and
2017
:
F-11
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Balance at the beginning of the year
|
$
|
83,789
|
|
$
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
(Recoveries)/provision for bad debts
|
(14,000
|
)
|
63,000
|
|
|||
|
Charge-offs
|
(6,062
|
)
|
(2,211
|
)
|
|||
|
Balance at the end of the year
|
$
|
63,727
|
|
$
|
83,789
|
|
|
Note 4– Property and Equipment
The net carrying value of property and equipment at
December 31, 2018
and
2017
was as follows:
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
$
|
293,152
|
|
$
|
288,536
|
|
|
|
Equipment
|
1,527,054
|
|
1,509,464
|
|
|||
|
Software
|
9,142,075
|
|
7,582,181
|
|
|||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
421,016
|
|
455,850
|
|
|||
|
Subtotal
|
$
|
11,383,297
|
|
$
|
9,836,031
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(9,259,625
|
)
|
(7,529,752
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,123,672
|
|
$
|
2,306,279
|
|
|
Note 5 – Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The following is a schedule of intangible assets and goodwill as of
December 31, 2018
:
|
|
Term
|
Carrying
Value
|
Accumulated Amortization and Impairment
|
Net Carrying Value
|
2018
Amortization
|
||||||||||||
|
Customer list, Google
|
20 years
|
$
|
8,820,000
|
|
$
|
(3,013,500
|
)
|
$
|
5,806,500
|
|
$
|
441,000
|
|
||||
|
Technology, NetSeer
|
5 years
|
3,600,000
|
|
(1,380,000
|
)
|
2,220,000
|
|
720,000
|
|
||||||||
|
Customer list, all other
|
10 years
|
1,610,000
|
|
(1,100,194
|
)
|
509,806
|
|
161,004
|
|
||||||||
|
Customer relationships, NetSeer
|
20 years
|
570,000
|
|
(54,625
|
)
|
515,375
|
|
28,500
|
|
||||||||
|
Trade names, web properties (1)
|
-
|
390,000
|
|
—
|
|
390,000
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Brand, NetSeer
|
1 year
|
121,000
|
|
(121,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
10,083
|
|
||||||||
|
Non-competition agreements, NetSeer
|
1 year
|
69,000
|
|
(69,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
5,750
|
|
||||||||
|
Intangible assets classified as long-term
|
$
|
15,180,000
|
|
$
|
(5,738,319
|
)
|
$
|
9,441,681
|
|
$
|
1,366,337
|
|
|||||
|
Goodwill, total
|
|
$
|
9,853,342
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
9,853,342
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
The following is a schedule of intangible assets and goodwill as of
December 31, 2017
:
F-12
|
|
Term
|
Carrying
Value
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net Carrying Value
|
2017
Amortization
|
||||||||||||
|
Customer list, Google
|
20 years
|
$
|
8,820,000
|
|
$
|
(2,572,500
|
)
|
$
|
6,247,500
|
|
$
|
441,000
|
|
||||
|
Technology, NetSeer
|
5 years
|
3,600,000
|
|
(660,000
|
)
|
2,940,000
|
|
660,000
|
|
||||||||
|
Customer list, all other
|
10 years
|
1,610,000
|
|
(939,190
|
)
|
670,810
|
|
161,004
|
|
||||||||
|
Trade names, ALOT
|
5 years
|
960,000
|
|
(960,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
32,000
|
|
||||||||
|
Customer relationships, NetSeer
|
20 years
|
570,000
|
|
(26,125
|
)
|
543,875
|
|
26,125
|
|
||||||||
|
Domain websites (2)
|
5 years
|
300,001
|
|
(300,001
|
)
|
—
|
|
32,056
|
|
||||||||
|
Tradenames, web properties (1)
|
-
|
390,000
|
|
—
|
|
390,000
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Brand, NetSeer
|
1 year
|
121,000
|
|
(110,917
|
)
|
10,083
|
|
110,917
|
|
||||||||
|
Non-competition agreements, NetSeer
|
1 year
|
69,000
|
|
(63,250
|
)
|
5,750
|
|
63,250
|
|
||||||||
|
Intangible assets classified as long-term
|
|
$
|
16,440,001
|
|
$
|
(5,631,983
|
)
|
$
|
10,808,018
|
|
$
|
1,526,352
|
|
||||
|
Goodwill, total
|
|
$
|
9,853,342
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
9,853,342
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
___________
|
(1)
|
The trade names related to our web properties have an indefinite life, and as such are not amortized.
|
|
(2)
|
In May 2015, we purchased
two
domain websites with a fair value of
$715,874
. We determined they should be amortized over
5
years. In May 2016, the carrying value was adjusted by approximately
$46,000
to reflect the lower price paid as compared to the contingent liability recorded as a result of the change in the price of Inuvo stock from the date of acquisition to the first contingent release of shares. In 2017, we determined that the seller would not meet the specific performance target for the second and third years and therefore, we adjusted the carrying value of the intangible asset and associated contingent liability by
$369,506
.
|
Our amortization expense over the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
|
2019
|
$
|
1,350,504
|
|
|
2020
|
1,350,504
|
|
|
|
2021
|
1,350,504
|
|
|
|
2022
|
556,294
|
|
|
|
2023
|
469,500
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
3,974,375
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
9,051,681
|
|
Note 6 - Bank Debt
The following table summarizes our outstanding bank debt balances:
|
December 31, 2018
|
December 31, 2017
|
|||||||
|
Revolving credit line - 5.25 percent at December 31, 2017 (prime plus 0.75 percent), due September 29, 2018 - current portion
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4,900,000
|
|
||
|
Financed receivables - 6.5 percent at December 31, 2018 (prime plus 1 percent) on invoice receivables; 7.5 percent at December 31, 2018 (prime plus 2 percent) on uninvoiced receivables
|
1,859,853
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,859,853
|
|
$
|
4,900,000
|
|
||
On March 1, 2012 we entered into a Business Financing Agreement with Bridge Bank, which is now owned by Western Alliance Bank. The agreement provided us with a revolving credit line of up to
$10 million
which we use to help satisfy our working capital needs. We have provided Western Alliance with a first priority perfected security interest in all of our accounts and personal property as collateral for the credit facility. Available funds under the revolving credit line are
85%
of eligible
F-13
accounts receivable balances up to a limit of
$10 million
. Eligible accounts receivable is generally defined as those from United States based customers that are not more than
90
days from the date of the invoice.
On April 18, 2018, we entered into the Tenth Business Financing Modification Agreement with Western Alliance Bank the parent company of Bridge Bank, N.A., our original lender, that modified the existing agreement. The modified terms require a monthly quick ratio of not less than
.60
to 1.00 from February 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018; and a monthly quick ratio of not less than
.70
to 1.00 on and after December 31, 2018; and the quarterly consolidated Adjusted EBITDA shall not negatively deviate from financial projections by more than
$18,000
for the quarter ending March 31, 2018,
$57,000
for the quarter ending June 30, 2018,
$191,000
for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 and
$496,000
for the quarter ended December 31, 2018, or with respect to any quarter in 2019 and beyond, by more than
25%
from projections. In addition, the finance charge for outstanding advances is equal to Prime Rate plus one basis point.
On September 19, 2018, we entered into the Eleventh Business Financing Modification Agreement with Western Alliance Bank that modified the existing agreement by extending the maturity date to October 20, 2018.
On October 11, 2018, we entered into the Amended and Restated Business Financing Agreement with Western Alliance Bank and superseded the Business Financing Agreement, as amended, entered into on March 1, 2012 with Bridge Bank, N.A. which is now owned by Western Alliance Bank. The Amended and Restated Financing Agreement may be terminated by either party upon notice to the other party. The material terms of the Amended and Restated Financing Agreement include financing eligible invoiced receivables at an advance rate of
85%
and an interest rate of prime plus
1%
and a sub-limit of up to
$2.5 million
of uninvoiced eligible receivables at an advance rate of
75%
and an interest rate of prime plus
2%
. The sub-limit provision expires at the end of April 2019. The Amended and Restated Financing Agreement includes certain fees; a facility fee of
$11,765
due at closing; an annual facility fee of
0.25%
of the account balance due beginning on April 20, 2019; a monthly maintenance fee of
0.125%
of the ending daily account balance; a
$30,000
fee in lieu of a warrant; and
$80,000
due upon termination of the agreement or repayment of our obligations under the agreement. The Amended and Restated Financing Agreement is secured by all of our assets.
Note 7 - Notes Payable
On November 2, 2018, each of Messrs. Richard K. Howe, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and member of our board of directors, and Charles D. Morgan, G. Kent Burnett and Gordon Cameron, members of the Company’s board of directors, lent the Company
$62,500
, for an aggregate of
$250,000
, under the terms of
10%
Promissory Notes. The Company is using the proceeds from these notes to pay certain costs associated with the pending Merger. The notes are unsecured, bear interest at
10%
per annum and the principal and accrued interest is due on November 2, 2019, subject to acceleration upon an Event of Default or Change of Control (as both terms are defined in the note) (see Note 18 - Related Party Transactions).
Note 8 - Convertible Promissory Note
On November 1, 2018, the Company and ConversionPoint Investments, LLC., an affiliate of CPT (the "Noteholder") entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for up to
$2 million
pursuant to which the Company issued and sold a
$1,000,000
principal amount
10%
senior unsecured subordinated convertible promissory note ("the Subordinated Promissory Note") to the Noteholder which we are using for working capital. The Subordinated Promissory Note, which bears interest at the rate of
10%
per annum, and the principal and accrued interest is due on November 1, 2021. In the event Merger Agreement is terminated, and providing that the shares issuable upon the possible conversion of the Subordinated Promissory Note have been approved for listing on the NYSE American, the Noteholder may, upon
15 days
written notice to the Company, elect to convert all or any portion of the principal and accrued and unpaid interest due under the Subordinated Promissory Note into shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 19 - ConversionPoint Merger). The conversion portion of the Subordinated Promissory Note was analyzed for derivative accounting and is deemed immaterial.
Note 9 – Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following at
December 31, 2018
and
2017
:
F-14
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Accrued marketing costs (TAC)
|
$
|
1,509,843
|
|
$
|
1,107,404
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
461,823
|
|
624,688
|
|
|||
|
Accrued payroll and commission liabilities
|
200,290
|
|
867,634
|
|
|||
|
Capital leases, current portion
|
198,769
|
|
209,940
|
|
|||
|
Arkansas grant contingency
|
55,000
|
|
2,245
|
|
|||
|
Accrued sales allowance
|
50,000
|
|
50,000
|
|
|||
|
Accrued taxes, current portion
|
14,109
|
|
25,905
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,489,834
|
|
$
|
2,887,816
|
|
|
Note 10 – Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following at
December 31, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Deferred rent
|
$
|
98,276
|
|
$
|
131,493
|
|
|
|
Capital leases, less current portion
|
80,969
|
|
281,470
|
|
|||
|
Accrued taxes, less current portion
|
13,762
|
|
13,762
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
193,007
|
|
$
|
426,725
|
|
|
Note 11 - Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes consists of the following at
December 31, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Current tax provision
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(91,477
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
—
|
|
(1,406,599
|
)
|
|||
|
Total tax benefit
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(1,498,076
|
)
|
|
In 2017, we recognized an income tax benefit of
$1,498,076
due to the passing of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017. The new law reduced corporate income tax rates from 35% to 21%. As a result, the deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded in the consolidated balance sheets were reevaluated at the new tax rates. Both the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities were reduced. The decrease in the deferred tax liability resulted in the one-time income tax benefit.
A reconciliation of the expected Federal statutory rate to our actual rate as reported for each of the periods presented is as follows:
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||
|
Federal statutory rate
|
21
|
%
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
State income tax rate, net of federal benefit
|
(1
|
%)
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
Permanent differences
|
(2
|
%)
|
(2
|
%)
|
|
|
Impact in changes in tax law
|
—
|
%
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
(18
|
%)
|
(25
|
%)
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
33
|
%
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are the result of temporary differences between book and tax basis of certain assets and liabilities, timing of income and expense recognition of certain items and net operating loss carry-forwards.
We assess temporary differences resulting from different treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets on a regular basis, an exercise that requires significant judgment. In the course of this evaluation we
F-15
considered our recent history of tax losses, the economic conditions in which we operate, recent organizational changes and our forecasts and projections. We believe it is more likely than not that essentially none of our deferred tax assets will be realized, and we have recorded a valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets that may not be realized as of
December 31, 2018
and
2017
.
The following is a schedule of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net operating loss carry forward
|
$
|
31,473,506
|
|
$
|
29,622,135
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
863,400
|
|
1,278,900
|
|
|||
|
Stock based expenses
|
—
|
|
1,176,900
|
|
|||
|
Accrued expense
|
142,000
|
|
362,000
|
|
|||
|
Deferred rent
|
27,000
|
|
33,400
|
|
|||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
17,500
|
|
23,200
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
140,300
|
|
7,200
|
|
|||
|
Subtotal
|
32,663,706
|
|
32,503,735
|
|
|||
|
Less valuation allowance
|
(32,663,706
|
)
|
(32,503,735
|
)
|
|||
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Intangible assets and property and equipment
|
2,162,500
|
|
2,307,600
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
177,332
|
|
24,300
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
2,339,832
|
|
2,331,900
|
|
|||
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
$
|
(2,339,832
|
)
|
$
|
(2,331,900
|
)
|
|
The net operating losses amounted to approximately
$89,272,000
and expire beginning 2021 through 2038. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Code Section 382, the use of certain of the Company’s net operating loss carry forwards are limited due to a cumulative change in ownership.
We are currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ending December 31, 2015 through 2017. Our state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the same periods.
We recognize interest and penalties related to income taxes in income tax expense. We have incurred
no
penalties and interest for the years ended
December 31, 2018
and
2017
.
Note 12 - Stock-Based Compensation
We maintain a stock-based compensation program intended to attract, retain and provide incentives for talented employees and directors and align stockholder and employee interests. Currently, we grant options and restricted stock units ("RSUs") from the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (“2010 ECP”) and the 2017 Equity Compensation Plan ("2017 ECP"). Option and restricted stock unit vesting periods are generally up to
three
years.
Compensation Expense
We recorded stock-based compensation expense for all equity incentive plans of
$915,469
and
$1,279,807
for the years ended
December 31, 2018
and
2017
, respectively. Total compensation cost not yet recognized at
December 31, 2018
was
$944,426
to be recognized over a weighted-average recognition period of
1.6 years
.
Award Information and Activity
The following table summarizes the stock grants outstanding under our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2005 LTIP"), 2010 ECP and 2017 ECP plans as of
December 31, 2018
:
F-16
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
RSUs Outstanding
|
Options and RSUs Exercised
|
Available Shares
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
2017 ECP
|
—
|
|
733,500
|
|
41,664
|
|
1,524,836
|
|
2,300,000
|
|
||||
|
2010 ECP
|
250,498
|
|
838,364
|
|
3,380,919
|
|
612,237
|
|
5,082,018
|
|
||||
|
2005 LTIP (*)
|
13,748
|
|
—
|
|
950,085
|
|
—
|
|
963,833
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
264,246
|
|
1,571,864
|
|
4,372,668
|
|
2,137,073
|
|
8,345,851
|
|
||||
(*) Expired June 2015
The fair value of restricted stock units is determined using market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. The use of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense and include the expected life of the option, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, exercise price, and forfeiture rate. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period. The forfeiture rate, which is estimated at a weighted average of
0%
of unvested options outstanding, is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.
At
December 31, 2018
, the 2005 LTIP and 2010 ECP plans had
264,246
outstanding options and all were exercisable with an aggregate intrinsic value of
$0
, a weighted average exercise price of
$2.84
and a weighted average remaining contractual term of
2.1 years
.
The following table summarizes our stock option activity under the 2005 LTIP and 2010 ECP plans during
2018
:
|
|
Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
||||
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
264,246
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Forfeited, expired or cancelled
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
264,246
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of year
|
264,246
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
|
No
options were granted during
2018
or
2017
.
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with or longer than the expected life of the options. The expected life of the options is based on the vesting schedule of the option in relation to the overall term of the option. The risk free interest rate is based on the market yield of the U.S. Treasury Bill with a term equal to the expected term of the option awarded. We do not anticipate paying any dividends so the dividend yield in the model is
zero
.
The following table summarizes our restricted stock activity for
2018
:
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
Weighted Average Fair Value
|
||||
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
1,071,538
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
1,664,266
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
641,843
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
522,097
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
1,571,864
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
Note 13 – Stockholders Equity
Earnings per Share
During the 2018 and 2017, we generated a net loss from continuing operations and as a result, all of our shares are anti-dilutive.
F-17
Note 14 – Discontinued Operations
Certain of our subsidiaries previously operated in the European Union ("EU"). Though operations ceased in 2009, statutory requirements made it necessary to have a continued presence in the EU for varying terms until November 2015. Profits and losses generated from the remaining assets and liabilities are accounted for as discontinued operations.
In the third quarter of 2016, our petition with the UK (United Kingdom) Companies House to strike off and dissolve the remaining subsidiary in the EU was approved. As of
December 31, 2017
, we recorded a net income of
$1,109
due primarily to the adjustment of certain accrued liabilities.
Note 15 – Retirement Plan Costs
We provide a 401(k) plan to help our employees prepare for retirement where we matched each employee's contributions to the plan up to the first
four percent
of the employee's annual salary. Effective October 31, 2018, the employer match was suspended. The matching contribution for the years ended
December 31, 2018
and
2017
was
$222,083
and
$255,366
, respectively.
Note 16 - Leases
We lease certain office space and equipment. As leases expire, it can be expected that they will be renewed or replaced in the normal course of business. Rent expense was
$411,135
and
$431,949
for the year ended
December 31, 2018
and
2017
, respectively.
Minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases for the periods ended December 31:
|
Lease Payments
|
|||
|
2019
|
$
|
477,319
|
|
|
2020
|
405,606
|
|
|
|
2021
|
242,558
|
|
|
|
2022
|
$
|
163,284
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,288,767
|
|
In April 2015, we entered into a
five
-year agreement to lease office space in Little Rock, Arkansas commencing October 1, 2015, to serve as our headquarters. The lease is for
12,245
square feet and will cost approximately
$171,000
during its first year. Thereafter, the lease payment increases by
2%
.
As part of the 2017 asset acquisition, Inuvo assumed the office space lease and a lease obligation in Sunnyvale, CA. The lease was for
15,717
square feet and cost approximately
$95,000
for the remaining term of the lease which expired in July 2017.
In June 2017, we entered into an agreement to lease
4,801
square feet of office space in San Jose, CA commencing on July 17, 2017. The lease has a term of
five
years and will cost approximately
$216,000
during its first year. Thereafter, the lease payments increase by
3%
.
In June 2017, we entered into an agreement with Dell Financial Services to lease computer equipment for our data centers. The lease has a term of
three
years and will cost approximately
$173,000
over the life of the lease.
Capital lease obligations and future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable capital leases as of
December 31, 2018
are:
F-18
|
Lease Payments
|
|||
|
2019
|
$
|
213,879
|
|
|
2020
|
82,405
|
|
|
|
Total payments under capital lease obligations
|
296,284
|
|
|
|
Less amount representing interest
|
(16,546
|
)
|
|
|
Present value of capital lease obligations
|
279,738
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
(198,769
|
)
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
$
|
80,969
|
|
Assets acquired under capital lease obligations are included in property and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Cost and related accumulated depreciation as of
December 31, 2018
and 2017 are as follows:
|
2018
|
2017
|
|||||
|
Equipment
|
$
|
707,264
|
|
$
|
707,264
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(441,084
|
)
|
(242,169
|
)
|
||
|
Equipment, net
|
$
|
266,180
|
|
$
|
465,095
|
|
Depreciation expense on assets under capital lease obligations was
$198,914
and
$173,097
for the years ended
December 31, 2018
and 2017, respectively and is included in the consolidated statements of operations.
In February 2017, we acquired the assets and certain liabilities of NetSeer, Inc. including the capital lease for computer equipment with a remaining value at that time of
$88,575
.
In June 2017, we entered into an agreement with Dell Financial Services to lease computer equipment for our data centers. The lease has a term of
three
years and will cost approximately
$516,000
over the life of the lease.
Note 17 - NetSeer Acquisition
On February 6, 2017, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement to acquire the assets of NetSeer, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, we acquired substantially all of the assets of NetSeer, and assumed certain liabilities and personnel obligations, in exchange for
3,529,000
shares of our common stock. Of this amount,
529,350
shares were deposited into escrow with our counsel under the terms of an escrow agreement pending possible post-closing adjustments in the purchase price related to working capital and audited financial statement adjustments, as well as in connection with possible indemnification claims post-closing. In August 2017, these shares were released from escrow and delivered to the sellers in accordance with the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. The operating results of this acquisition have been included in the consolidated statements of operations since the acquisition date. As a result of the business acquisition, the Company recognized goodwill in the amount of
$4,013,034
. The factors contributing to the recognition of the amount of goodwill are based on strategic benefits that are expected to be realized from the asset acquisition. The Company incurred approximately
$350,000
in acquisition related costs, which are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
F-19
|
Total consideration paid in common stock (with marketability discount applied)
|
$
|
4,459,244
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired:
|
|||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
(2,292,485
|
)
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(236,163
|
)
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
(119,101
|
)
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
(4,013,034
|
)
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
(4,360,000
|
)
|
|
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed:
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
3,579,787
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
1,152,789
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
49,149
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
2,015,577
|
|
|
|
Cash received in acquisition
|
$
|
235,763
|
|
In accordance with ASC guidance related to business combinations, net consideration was first allocated to the fair value of assets acquired, including specifically identifiable intangible assets and liabilities assumed, with the excess being recorded as goodwill. Goodwill related to this acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes and is not amortized, but instead is subject to periodic impairment tests.
The purchase includes the assumption of gross customer accounts receivable totaling
$2,292,485
. The Company has collected most of these receivables and has recorded them at their fair value, the gross contractual amount. Specifically identifiable intangible assets consist of
$4,360,000
and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life. Additionally, revenue totaling approximately
$15.8 million
from the 2017 asset acquisition is included in the consolidated statements of operations as of December 31, 2017.
Note 18 - Related Party Transactions
In 2018 and 2017, the Company received a total of
$31,500
and
$117,385
, respectively from First Orion Corp., which is partially owned by
two
directors and shareholders of Inuvo, for providing IT services.
On November 2, 2018, each of Messrs. Richard K. Howe, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and member of our board of directors, and Charles D. Morgan, G. Kent Burnett and Gordon Cameron, members of the Company’s board of directors, lent the Company
$62,500
, for an aggregate of
$250,000
, under the terms of
10%
Promissory Notes. The Company is using the proceeds from these notes to pay certain costs associated with the pending Merger. The notes are unsecured, bear interest at
10%
per annum and the principal and accrued interest is due on November 2, 2019, subject to acceleration upon an Event of Default or Change of Control (as both terms are defined in the note) (see Note 7 - Notes Payable).
Note 19 - ConversionPoint Merger
On November 2, 2018, the Company entered into the Merger Agreement with CPT, ConversionPoint Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CPT (“Parent”), CPT Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“CPT Merger Sub”), and CPT Cigar Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Inuvo Merger Sub”). The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, the Company will merge with and into Inuvo Merger Sub with the Company as the surviving corporation in the Inuvo Merger (the “Inuvo Merger”), and CPT merging with and into CPT Merger Sub with CPT as the surviving corporation in the CPT Merger (the “CPT Merger” and collectively with the Inuvo Merger, the “Merger”). Upon consummation of the Merger, CPT and Inuvo will be wholly-owned subsidiaries of Parent. The Merger Agreement was unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of each of the Company, CPT, Parent, CPT Merger Sub, and Inuvo Merger Sub.
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger the Company’s shareholders will be entitled to receive
$0.45
in cash and
0.18877
shares of Parent common stock for each share of common stock of the Company, and CPT’s stockholders will be entitled to receive
0.9840
shares of Parent common stock for
F-20
each share of common stock of CPT. Each outstanding option to acquire a share of the Company’s common stock will be converted into an option to acquire
0.2370
shares of Parent’s common stock. In addition, unvested restricted stock units will vest in full immediately prior to consummation of the Merger and will be entitled to receive the merger consideration. No fractional shares of Parent common stock will be issued in the Merger and Parent stockholders and CPT stockholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional interests.
The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties from each party to the agreement, and each party has agreed to customary covenants, including, among others, covenants relating to (1) the conduct of the CPT’s and the Company’s businesses during the interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the Merger, (2) the Company’s obligations to facilitate its shareholders’ consideration of, and voting upon, the Merger Agreement and the Inuvo Merger, (3) CPT’s obligations to facilitate its stockholders’ consideration of, and voting upon, the Merger Agreement and the CPT Merger, (4) the recommendation by the Board of Directors of the Company in favor of approval of the Merger Agreement and the Inuvo Merger by the Company’s shareholders, and (5) the Company’s non-solicitation obligations relating to alternative business combination transactions.
The completion of the Merger is subject to (1) the approval of CPT’s stockholders and the Company’s shareholders, (2) regulatory approvals, (3) the closing of financing to the Parent of
$36,000,000
(the “Financing”), (4) the approval of the listing of shares of Parent’s common stock on NASDAQ and conditional approval for listing on the TSX, (5) the delivery of customary opinions from counsel to the CPT and the Company to the effect that the Merger will qualify as a tax-free exchange for federal income tax purposes (6) Parent entering into separation agreements with Mr. Howe, the Company Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Ruiz, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and Mr. Pisaris, the Company’s General Counsel, and (7) other customary closing conditions. Immediately following the Merger, Richard K. Howe will serve as non-executive chairman of the board of directors of the Parent and an additional individual appointed by Inuvo shall serve on the seven member board of directors of the Parent.
The Merger Agreement contains customary termination rights for both the Company and CPT and further provides that (1) a termination payment of approximately
$2.8 million
will be payable by the Company to CPT in certain circumstances; and (2) a termination payment of approximately
$2.8 million
will be payable by CPT to the Company in certain circumstances, including if the Parent fails to consummate the Financing by May 31, 2019.
On November 1, 2018, the Company and CPT Investments, LLC., an affiliate of CPT (the "Noteholder") entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for up to
$2 million
pursuant to which the Company issued and sold a
$1,000,000
principal amount
10%
senior unsecured subordinated convertible promissory note ("the Subordinated Promissory Note") to the Noteholder which we are using for working capital.
The Subordinated Promissory Note, which bears interest at the rate of
10%
per annum, and the principal and accrued interest is due on November 1, 2021. The maturity date of the Subordinated Promissory Note is subject to acceleration in the event (i) the Closing (as that term is defined in the Merger Agreement) occur pursuant to the Merger Agreement, in which event the maturity date is accelerated to the fifth day after the Closing Date (as that term is defined in the Merger Agreement) and (ii) immediately upon an Event of Default (as that term is defined in the Subordinated Promissory Note). The Company has the right to prepay the amounts due under the Subordinated Promissory Note at any time, upon 15 days prior written notice to the Noteholder, subject to the term of the note and Noteholder consent. The Company’s obligations under the Subordinated Promissory Note are unsecured and subordinate to its obligations to Western Alliance Bank, the Company’s secured lender.
In the event Merger Agreement is terminated, and providing that the shares issuable upon the possible conversion of the Subordinated Promissory Note have been approved for listing on the NYSE American, the Noteholder may, upon 15 days written notice to the Company, elect to convert all or any portion of the principal and accrued and unpaid interest due under the Subordinated Promissory Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of
$0.44
per share, or
$0.35
per share if the Merger Agreement is terminated for any reason other than in connection with a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement). The conversion prices are subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock split or adjustments. The Subordinated Promissory Note also contains a provision limiting the Company’s ability to issue any shares of our common stock upon any voluntary conversion by the Noteholder which, when aggregated with all shares of its common stock issued pursuant to a conversion of the Subordinated Promissory Note, would exceed
19.99%
of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock immediately preceding the issuance of the note without first obtaining stockholder approval in accordance with the rules of the NYSE American.
On November 1, 2018 the Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the Noteholder covering the shares of its common stock which may be issued upon a conversion of the Subordinated Promissory Note.
F-21
Note 20 - Subsequent Events
Effective February 1, 2019, the Amended and Restated Business Financing Agreement with Western Alliance Bank was amended with the First Amendment to Amended and Restated Business Financing Agreement. The amendment extended the
$2.5 million
sublimit for unbilled eligible receivables to April 30, 2019 and increased the Success Fee from
$75,000
to
$80,000
.
On March 1, 2019, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with
three
accredited investors for the purchase and sale of an aggregate of
$1,440,000
of principal of Original Issue Discount Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Notes (“Notes”) due September 1, 2020 to fund working capital and additional expenses resulting from the delay in closing associated with the government shut down. The proceeds from the offering were
$1,200,000
. We did not pay any commissions or finders fees in connection with the sale of the Notes. Other than the original issue discount, no additional interest accrues on the Notes, except during the existence of an event of default under the Notes, where interest accrues at the lesser of (i) the rate of
15%
per annum, or (ii) the maximum amount permitted by law. The initial conversion price of the Notes is
$1.08
per share. Assuming no adjustment to the conversion price, the Note holders would receive
1,333,333
unregistered shares of our common stock. The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion are restricted, subject to resale under Rule 144. If the Mergers (see Note 19), however, are not completed or a change of control does not occur within six months of the issuance of the Notes, each holder has the right to immediately convert any portion of the Note at the greater of (a) a
20%
discount from the average VWAP for the
10
trading days prior to giving notice of conversion, or (b)
$0.44
per share. Should the Mergers fail to close and the note to CPT Investments, LLC (see Note 8) is converted into our common stock, the holders are then permitted to immediately convert any portion of the Note at
$0.44
per share.
On March 1, 2019, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated November 2, 2018 (the “
Amendment
”) to (i) due to the delays in the SEC’s ability to review and declare effective securities filings because of the government shutdown, extend the outside date for New Parent to receive funding in a financing from May 31, 2019 to July 12, 2019, and extend the outside termination date for closing of the Mergers from June 30, 2019, to August 5, 2019, (ii) permit the issuances of the above described Notes and permit us to issue up to
3,272,728
shares of common stock or securities convertible into up to
3,272,728
shares of our common stock, and waive any breach of our representations, warranties, or covenants that would be caused by the stock issuance. Our exchange ratio of
0.18877
shares of New Parent common stock for each share of our common stock for the stock portion of the merger consideration is adjusted downward to account for the dilutive effect of the stock issuance, and (iii) permit us to amend our articles of incorporation to increase the amount of its authorized shares of common stock from
40,000,000
to
60,000,000
.
F-22
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement SchedulesItem 16. Form 10-k SummaryNote 1 Organization and BusinessNote 2 Summary Of Significant Accounting PoliciesNote 3 Allowance For Doubtful AccountsNote 4 Property and EquipmentNote 5 Intangible Assets and GoodwillNote 6 - Bank DebtNote 7 - Notes PayableNote 8 - Convertible Promissory NoteNote 9 Accrued Expenses and Other Current LiabilitiesNote 10 Other Long-term LiabilitiesNote 11 - Income TaxesNote 12 - Stock-based CompensationNote 13 Stockholders EquityNote 14 Discontinued OperationsNote 15 Retirement Plan CostsNote 16 - LeasesNote 17 - Netseer AcquisitionNote 18 - Related Party TransactionsNote 19 - Conversionpoint MergerNote 20 - Subsequent Events